EmoClass stringclasses 10
values | EmoAct float64 1 7 | EmoVal float64 1 7 | EmoDom float64 1 7 | SpkrID int64 1 3.33k | Gender stringclasses 2
values | Split_Set stringclasses 2
values | transcript stringlengths 1 353 ⌀ | emotion2vec_features listlengths 1 1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
H | 3 | 4 | 3 | 480 | Male | Train | or that it's the biggest gift to the internet. i think it's really the biggest gift to free speech for everybody, right? because if you don't have 230 set up the way it is | [
{
"feats": [
0.12954246997833252,
-0.22000032663345337,
0.12851890921592712,
-0.06547202914953232,
0.5994811654090881,
0.2736624777317047,
-0.030733805149793625,
1.2644211053848267,
0.6732720136642456,
-0.003924389835447073,
-0.6448498964309692,
... |
X | 5 | 5 | 3 | 480 | Male | Train | set up, there would be much more limited ability for users to actually post content online. and it's a little bit crazy to me that people | [
{
"feats": [
0.13090991973876953,
-0.2008226364850998,
0.12107276916503906,
0.006048034876585007,
0.6151405572891235,
0.3614792823791504,
0.007380313239991665,
1.2935853004455566,
0.6769179105758667,
0.026487423107028008,
-0.7659794688224792,
... |
H | 3 | 4 | 4 | 480 | Male | Train | think that changing or getting rid of 230 will enable more free speech when the balances that are set up within 230 are very much designed as a gift to free speech | [
{
"feats": [
0.1461675763130188,
-0.22023886442184448,
0.14168746769428253,
-0.046150099486112595,
0.5989164113998413,
0.29293665289878845,
-0.0028504831716418266,
1.2386412620544434,
0.7117712497711182,
0.04577856883406639,
-0.6967796087265015,
... |
N | 3 | 4 | 5 | 1,328 | Female | Train | okay. so now my question for you is | [
{
"feats": [
0.015952110290527344,
-0.19604502618312836,
0.18584893643856049,
0.09651115536689758,
0.7157970666885376,
0.428053081035614,
0.16051985323429108,
1.4196840524673462,
0.6982362270355225,
0.03355569764971733,
-0.6431835293769836,
... |
A | 5.166667 | 2.5 | 7 | 1,328 | Female | Train | given that we did enter this world where user generated content, whether on sites like youtube with videos or educational or non-educational or political, or non-political, we | [
{
"feats": [
0.10439174622297287,
-0.23760253190994263,
0.18628017604351044,
-0.053966622799634933,
0.6707948446273804,
0.22153756022453308,
-0.029171038419008255,
1.212708592414856,
0.8115794658660889,
0.023504838347434998,
-0.7356739640235901,
... |
H | 5 | 6 | 5 | 1,328 | Female | Train | now live in a world where a lot of these sites people often use a framing of platform versus publisher, which i think is kind of meaningless and arbitrary and then they also sometimes | [
{
"feats": [
0.06518231332302094,
-0.21025536954402924,
0.13654088973999023,
-0.03776155784726143,
0.6451320648193359,
0.28966718912124634,
0.0006155329756438732,
1.2890363931655884,
0.8322776556015015,
0.06754188239574432,
-0.6569485664367676,
... |
C | 4.333333 | 1.5 | 5.333333 | 1,328 | Female | Train | then use a ridiculous phrase platisher as a hybrid of the two, i'd love to get your take on that framing and how that doesn't or does apply here. | [
{
"feats": [
0.05551022291183472,
-0.21012338995933533,
0.17778821289539337,
-0.09528029710054398,
0.6712759733200073,
0.3093216121196747,
0.04852158948779106,
1.3293077945709229,
0.7401486039161682,
-0.039009418338537216,
-0.6191365122795105,
... |
H | 3 | 4 | 3 | 480 | Male | Train | so one of the things that comes up over and over again, you see people say, "well, if they moderate, or if they change content, they are no longer, | [
{
"feats": [
0.12366654723882675,
-0.27315452694892883,
0.13605336844921112,
-0.03565835952758789,
0.6495307087898254,
0.3009360134601593,
-0.014469430781900883,
1.323243498802185,
0.6618310213088989,
0.0032688023056834936,
-0.6718364953994751,
... |
X | 4 | 4 | 4 | 480 | Male | Train | a publisher. they are now a platform and therefore they lose section 230 protection." the law makes no distinction between platform and publisher. the law is not designed | [
{
"feats": [
0.11373409628868103,
-0.22079668939113617,
0.10395058989524841,
0.07424218952655792,
0.5878473520278931,
0.29168736934661865,
0.007608066778630018,
1.2328652143478394,
0.7373908758163452,
0.044075075536966324,
-0.624087393283844,
... |
A | 5.833333 | 2.166667 | 6.166667 | 480 | Male | Train | and to protect one or the other, or say that there is a difference between it. there's no, classification. it's not a safe harbor where you have to meet, a, b and c | [
{
"feats": [
0.04191206768155098,
-0.23844408988952637,
0.1963655650615692,
-0.06786108762025833,
0.6408495306968689,
0.2715896666049957,
-0.02784469723701477,
1.2273215055465698,
0.7722389101982117,
0.020524129271507263,
-0.6705282926559448,
... |
N | 4 | 4 | 4 | 480 | Male | Train | criteria in order to get the protections. you just need to be an interactive computer service that hosts third party content. so the debate over, are they a publisher or are they a platform | [
{
"feats": [
0.18409867584705353,
-0.22698839008808136,
0.1411140114068985,
0.023610644042491913,
0.6394060254096985,
0.31290203332901,
-0.0438544787466526,
1.2671436071395874,
0.7228176593780518,
0.026475058868527412,
-0.6621912121772766,
... |
H | 4 | 3 | 4 | 1,328 | Female | Train | as well around that. so one recent event is at twitter, it added a feature earlier this week where one of the president's tweets, they added- | [
{
"feats": [
0.0831887274980545,
-0.18802043795585632,
0.22781439125537872,
-0.06454890221357346,
0.6453375220298767,
0.28111526370048523,
-0.028673537075519562,
1.2415587902069092,
0.6483886241912842,
-0.03753262758255005,
-0.7439971566200256,
... |
H | 4 | 3 | 3 | 1,328 | Female | Train | .. a link to other sites as a quote fact check mechanism. and this could be contentious because a lot of people do not actually believe that everything the media writes- | [
{
"feats": [
0.05151985213160515,
-0.24975177645683289,
0.16879259049892426,
-0.01887497678399086,
0.6902711987495422,
0.3699454963207245,
0.07699675858020782,
1.4141342639923096,
0.7561735510826111,
-0.0009979339083656669,
-0.6617414951324463,
... |
N | 4 | 3 | 4 | 1,328 | Female | Train | ... is correct. that said, it linked to other third-party news sites, and it kind of labeled it as a fact check feature. then they added another thing where- | [
{
"feats": [
0.06106806918978691,
-0.23081913590431213,
0.2064981311559677,
0.009065037593245506,
0.646003246307373,
0.365958571434021,
0.04262322932481766,
1.3252583742141724,
0.6583369970321655,
0.009102615527808666,
-0.7035287022590637,
... |
H | 3 | 3 | 4 | 1,328 | Female | Train | ... people could retweet with comments, but they couldn't retweet, like, or reply to it because it violated their sites' terms of services around speech that incites violence. | [
{
"feats": [
0.1066509336233139,
-0.1858004480600357,
0.18960358202457428,
-0.017576072365045547,
0.678513765335083,
0.32199183106422424,
0.020216412842273712,
1.3334300518035889,
0.7168737053871155,
0.027845246717333794,
-0.8155981302261353,
... |
H | 3 | 3 | 4 | 1,328 | Female | Train | and so, in case one, they were adding what they quote called a fact-check layer. and in case too, they were adhering to their own terms of service around spreading violence- | [
{
"feats": [
0.0593608058989048,
-0.24810048937797546,
0.21873973309993744,
-0.06022182106971741,
0.7042394876480103,
0.2747664451599121,
0.07912350445985794,
1.3538841009140015,
0.7259266376495361,
-0.01944834180176258,
-0.6622776389122009,
... |
U | 5.333333 | 5.666667 | 6.833333 | 1,328 | Female | Train | ... and speech, which they said they kept up in the public interest. so that's a super, super high level summary of what happened so far, and so my question for you now, mike, is how- | [
{
"feats": [
0.11043398082256317,
-0.26446112990379333,
0.14746235311031342,
-0.059876490384340286,
0.6156185269355774,
0.29281672835350037,
-0.05270713195204735,
1.2713621854782104,
0.7059946060180664,
0.01573251001536846,
-0.5385035276412964,
... |
A | 7 | 2.333333 | 6 | 1,328 | Female | Train | ... does, and doesn't section 230 apply here because in this case, the fact check could be construed commentary content, not just third-party content.it's a- | [
{
"feats": [
0.06667719036340714,
-0.27024850249290466,
0.1807544231414795,
0.04155164584517479,
0.6241282224655151,
0.36978256702423096,
0.10170149803161621,
1.3207026720046997,
0.6744731664657593,
-0.004627058748155832,
-0.7538557648658752,
... |
H | 3 | 3 | 4 | 480 | Male | Train | ... really complex topic, and each layer of it adds new complexities. and each of those complexities is in some way important. let's do the two tweets separately. | [
{
"feats": [
0.07019081711769104,
-0.2826804220676422,
0.19224463403224945,
0.0023793161381036043,
0.6153232455253601,
0.3780480623245239,
-0.007634411565959454,
1.328094482421875,
0.6641671061515808,
0.0002841212844941765,
-0.7632044553756714,
... |
H | 4 | 4 | 3 | 480 | Male | Train | the first tweet they added something, and just as a minor correction, and this has been going around a lot, people said, this is the first time that twitter had used this. twitter has been using- | [
{
"feats": [
0.17234766483306885,
-0.20622460544109344,
0.17813678085803986,
0.013975370675325394,
0.6921840906143188,
0.31457385420799255,
-0.044301752001047134,
1.2053723335266113,
0.7746361494064331,
-0.024402879178524017,
-0.7268158197402954,... |
N | 3 | 5 | 3 | 480 | Male | Train | ... that feature over the last couple of months, but this is the first time they had done it on a politician's tweet. and so, what's amusing to me... | [
{
"feats": [
0.03628169372677803,
-0.2236717939376831,
0.13170935213565826,
-0.017540695145726204,
0.6158671975135803,
0.30503880977630615,
0.0078054978512227535,
1.2270621061325073,
0.6102590560913086,
-0.0038509066216647625,
-0.7679656744003296... |
H | 3 | 4 | 3 | 480 | Male | Train | ... is the time i saw it used before, which was about two weeks earlier, it was used to debunk a jimmy kimmel video that was making- | [
{
"feats": [
0.0812935009598732,
-0.19714470207691193,
0.10289204865694046,
-0.021796811372041702,
0.6997391581535339,
0.3575117588043213,
0.10288804769515991,
1.2602179050445557,
0.7430161237716675,
-0.07269822806119919,
-0.7123413681983948,
... |
A | 6.666667 | 1.5 | 7 | 480 | Male | Train | ... fun of mike pence, and twitter put a other thing that said, this is manipulated media, it is not accurate. it was a tweet that had gone viral, it was making fun of something that pence had- | [
{
"feats": [
0.13408400118350983,
-0.22342567145824432,
0.20334121584892273,
-0.031419266015291214,
0.5644861459732056,
0.3273531198501587,
-0.04115160554647446,
1.2130500078201294,
0.7072468400001526,
0.006638940889388323,
-0.6965900659561157,
... |
N | 3 | 4 | 3 | 480 | Male | Train | ... done and twitter stepped in and said, no, this is incorrect or manipulated media. and it had a link to third-party content saying why it was manipulated. and- | [
{
"feats": [
0.04125979542732239,
-0.2325509935617447,
0.1500767320394516,
-0.05388589948415756,
0.6112574934959412,
0.33716335892677307,
0.031936779618263245,
1.2637499570846558,
0.6619552969932556,
-0.006346993613988161,
-0.7401129007339478,
... |
H | 5 | 4.888889 | 4 | 480 | Male | Train | ... and, so that is allowed under 230. what it is doing is adding more speech, it is linking to other sources, it is providing more context. the- | [
{
"feats": [
0.06943013519048691,
-0.22684727609157562,
0.21194490790367126,
-0.034209731966257095,
0.630561888217926,
0.37776947021484375,
0.03851943463087082,
1.2896305322647095,
0.6750528216362,
0.029208127409219742,
-0.7353194355964661,
... |
X | 5 | 5 | 4 | 480 | Male | Train | ... particular line is from twitter itself and therefore is not protected by 230, but is completely protected by the first amendment. the third-party content- | [
{
"feats": [
0.12458895891904831,
-0.2786196768283844,
0.10727743059396744,
-0.03325231373310089,
0.5531464219093323,
0.26838696002960205,
-0.045420631766319275,
1.2406381368637085,
0.6524667739868164,
-0.041071031242609024,
-0.6764958500862122,
... |
U | 6 | 4 | 4 | 480 | Male | Train | ...that they link to, that is then protected by 230. and then the second tweet, twitter did something new, which i, this one i had not seen before in which- | [
{
"feats": [
0.04639571160078049,
-0.25219452381134033,
0.13126377761363983,
0.05456924065947533,
0.6334468126296997,
0.34667807817459106,
0.023168092593550682,
1.3951340913772583,
0.6284423470497131,
-0.04217297583818436,
-0.6234331727027893,
... |
H | 3 | 4 | 3 | 480 | Male | Train | ... they put up a note that said that, "this tweet violates the terms of service". however, they want to keep it up because they feel that it is relevant and important for p- | [
{
"feats": [
0.11168114840984344,
-0.17208890616893768,
0.15655997395515442,
-0.0016054888255894184,
0.5935026407241821,
0.26389724016189575,
-0.054464709013700485,
1.2641730308532715,
0.6438780426979065,
0.03642936050891876,
-0.6896228790283203,... |
A | 6 | 1 | 6 | 480 | Male | Train | ... people to be able to see the content, but to understand that it violated the terms of service. so they're adding more context and they limited the ability for people to retweet it or reply- | [
{
"feats": [
0.06837529689073563,
-0.22838537395000458,
0.08890314400196075,
0.047344647347927094,
0.5482156276702881,
0.24860656261444092,
-0.03797959163784981,
1.1999205350875854,
0.712130606174469,
-0.007361062336713076,
-0.748421847820282,
... |
N | 4 | 3 | 4 | 480 | Male | Train | ... a hundred percent, allowed by 230. it did not remove the content, it didn't take it down. even if twitter chose to take it down or take down his speech- | [
{
"feats": [
0.05703938752412796,
-0.18465358018875122,
0.14003752171993256,
-0.08158350735902786,
0.6321001648902893,
0.24921685457229614,
-0.02604798600077629,
1.2453526258468628,
0.6784362196922302,
0.0013350185472518206,
-0.7721861600875854,
... |
H | 4 | 4 | 3 | 480 | Male | Train | ... to take down that tweet, that wouldn't violate his free speech rights. the first amendment protects people from the government acting, not from a company. now i have also since seen twitter now- | [
{
"feats": [
0.0818319022655487,
-0.19173358380794525,
0.17377792298793793,
-0.00012639669876080006,
0.6235079765319824,
0.2796862721443176,
-0.014751182869076729,
1.2080506086349487,
0.7330207824707031,
-0.044968292117118835,
-0.7863503098487854... |
H | 3 | 5 | 4 | 480 | Male | Train | ... use that 'this tweet violates our terms of service, but we are leaving it up because it is newsworthy', message on at least one other tweet this morning from somebody who is defending- | [
{
"feats": [
0.12644095718860626,
-0.18882589042186737,
0.18880000710487366,
-0.008001882582902908,
0.5225224494934082,
0.2575186789035797,
-0.0023718250449746847,
1.1557409763336182,
0.6856170892715454,
0.02249268628656864,
-0.6675487160682678,
... |
N | 3 | 4 | 4 | 1,328 | Female | Train | ...the president'.and let me ask you another question, and then we can break down the executive order, which is what do you make since we already debunked this platform, publish- | [
{
"feats": [
0.040302105247974396,
-0.2500230669975281,
0.12833674252033234,
-0.023530101403594017,
0.6147983074188232,
0.24658076465129852,
0.056392621248960495,
1.221115231513977,
0.713076651096344,
0.033531151711940765,
-0.6099609136581421,
... |
S | 5 | 5 | 3 | 1,328 | Female | Train | ...er distinction that these companies that provide these interactive web services are like phone companies. they always use this line that, 'oh, but imagine if the phone company just- | [
{
"feats": [
0.1306016743183136,
-0.1662144809961319,
0.21181491017341614,
-0.008006072603166103,
0.6472269892692566,
0.3219565749168396,
-0.06900473684072495,
1.2994431257247925,
0.8160573244094849,
-0.08512352406978607,
-0.6913968324661255,
... |
H | 3 | 3 | 3 | 480 | Male | Train | ... decided to take down that conversation you had and interrupted you in the middle', what do you make of that analogy?yeah, so that is popular in a wide variety of circles- | [
{
"feats": [
0.08285008370876312,
-0.16838182508945465,
0.18100595474243164,
-0.052210379391908646,
0.5837075114250183,
0.28963470458984375,
0.0026611487846821547,
1.2926568984985352,
0.6996417045593262,
-0.044050537049770355,
-0.7488669157028198... |
N | 3 | 4 | 4 | 480 | Male | Train | ... across the political spectrum. that doesn't fall into any partisan viewpoint and the public utility argument.and that by the way, of course reminds me of net neutrality, which we- | [
{
"feats": [
0.11224763095378876,
-0.22555430233478546,
0.1367349773645401,
-0.09229011088609695,
0.5500454306602478,
0.19909940659999847,
-0.026316264644265175,
1.1608121395111084,
0.7827039361000061,
-0.0037965618539601564,
-0.6825065016746521,... |
H | 6 | 6 | 5 | 480 | Male | Train | ... both covered quite [crosstalk 00:04:32].right, there are some funny parallels between this situation and net neutrality, and that a lot of people's positions are reversed from one to the other.we don't have- | [
{
"feats": [
0.04930639639496803,
-0.15039587020874023,
0.06975270062685013,
-0.040707796812057495,
0.613828182220459,
0.19448547065258026,
-0.034931737929582596,
1.1891517639160156,
0.749029815196991,
-0.05764007940888405,
-0.7314222455024719,
... |
A | 5 | 1 | 7 | 1,328 | Female | Train | ... the time to talk about net neutrality, but i covered it extensively at wired, as you know, and from all different perspectives from carriers to fcc- | [
{
"feats": [
-0.010666880756616592,
-0.2095765769481659,
0.21310704946517944,
0.01572117768228054,
0.6214205026626587,
0.2662772536277771,
0.006079520098865032,
1.2926691770553589,
0.7714111804962158,
-0.032387956976890564,
-0.6453272104263306,
... |
U | 6.666667 | 4.833333 | 5.166667 | 1,328 | Female | Train | ... to internet companies, you name it. that is exactly what's fascinating to me, is that the positions and the sides are inverted in this case. so anyway, what do- | [
{
"feats": [
0.02991824597120285,
-0.22934727370738983,
0.1573888510465622,
0.016166646033525467,
0.6006291508674622,
0.24892295897006989,
-0.022708658128976822,
1.2601721286773682,
0.6975051760673523,
-0.043657492846250534,
-0.7311413884162903,
... |
X | 4 | 4 | 3 | 480 | Male | Train | ... you make of the phone and common carrier type arguments?yeah, so it's an important one to understand, but i don't think it applies, and i think that most people who are deep- | [
{
"feats": [
0.12319858372211456,
-0.22544635832309723,
0.1098010241985321,
-0.012368084862828255,
0.6304389834403992,
0.2938242554664612,
-0.010644812136888504,
1.191029667854309,
0.7239297032356262,
-0.037961360067129135,
-0.6850745677947998,
... |
X | 5 | 5 | 3 | 480 | Male | Train | ... ly familiar with public utilities and what is required to be declared a public utility would recognize that internet services were sometimes called edge providers, which are the services that you and i use- | [
{
"feats": [
0.10333839803934097,
-0.197982057929039,
0.12421166896820068,
0.052525151520967484,
0.6213539838790894,
0.25696420669555664,
-0.059629887342453,
1.2521978616714478,
0.7957038283348083,
0.008001646026968956,
-0.6793329119682312,
... |
X | 4 | 3 | 4 | 480 | Male | Train | ... everyday, and that we interact with, that they do not qualify, and they do not meet the requirements of a typical traditional utility service. and to clarify what that- | [
{
"feats": [
0.09802279621362686,
-0.23386971652507782,
0.16014868021011353,
0.012657463550567627,
0.6016843318939209,
0.2105739712715149,
-0.07935571670532227,
1.2410457134246826,
0.6927345991134644,
0.0027361693792045116,
-0.6931925415992737,
... |
N | 3 | 4 | 3 | 480 | Male | Train | ... means, usually a utility service is something that is offered to everybody, but also, is something that is commodified. the telephone service, if you- | [
{
"feats": [
0.07199977338314056,
-0.23683610558509827,
0.1318661868572235,
-0.042482197284698486,
0.6038358211517334,
0.3142147362232208,
0.013388700783252716,
1.2633044719696045,
0.6480146646499634,
0.00029844988603144884,
-0.6809022426605225,
... |
A | 6.666667 | 2.333333 | 6.833333 | 480 | Male | Train | ... use at&t or sprint, or verizon, you are getting the exact same service. there is no real differentiation in terms of the service that you are getting. it is- | [
{
"feats": [
0.11653444170951843,
-0.19827796518802643,
0.19055521488189697,
-0.015986701473593712,
0.6358942985534668,
0.27853357791900635,
-0.024838155135512352,
1.200307846069336,
0.7753762006759644,
0.054542239755392075,
-0.6989614963531494,
... |
N | 6 | 5 | 3 | 480 | Male | Train | ... a commodity, one provider to the other, same thing. that is not the case with various internet edge providers, google, youtube, twitter, facebook- | [
{
"feats": [
0.1026817038655281,
-0.22366634011268616,
0.20871783792972565,
0.03899513557553291,
0.6194624304771423,
0.35966020822525024,
0.04594651237130165,
1.2390168905258179,
0.6900975108146667,
0.0022293722722679377,
-0.7603760361671448,
... |
N | 3 | 4 | 5 | 480 | Male | Train | ... each of them have all of these different features and all of these different things. they are not one-to-one replaceable, it is not a commodity that you can switch out. and therefore the public utility argument does not- | [
{
"feats": [
0.06305456906557083,
-0.27190718054771423,
0.18658246099948883,
-0.0075662448070943356,
0.5910855531692505,
0.2538113594055176,
-0.03474428132176399,
1.226318359375,
0.7251160740852356,
-0.028707608580589294,
-0.6776378750801086,
... |
A | 7 | 2 | 7 | 480 | Male | Train | ... really apply. you can argue that there should be some other kind of classification, and some people argue that, but comparing them directly to a telephone service is different- | [
{
"feats": [
0.06031091883778572,
-0.2686285674571991,
0.1744711995124817,
-0.04447831213474274,
0.6090160012245178,
0.24479728937149048,
-0.005724315065890551,
1.2196816205978394,
0.7029966711997986,
0.0181419737637043,
-0.6817177534103394,
... |
N | 4 | 3 | 4 | 480 | Male | Train | ... because it's not core infrastructure, it's things that are at the edge, things that you use as just a service provided beyond that.what do you then make of- | [
{
"feats": [
0.07472224533557892,
-0.2390909343957901,
0.15926767885684967,
0.027897723019123077,
0.6201865077018738,
0.3179827034473419,
0.049991872161626816,
1.3277204036712646,
0.7577799558639526,
-0.01763187162578106,
-0.6905867457389832,
... |
N | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1,328 | Female | Train | ... this public square/public forum argument?people say that twitter or facebook shouldn't be allowed to do any moderation, they shouldn't be able to take down any content- | [
{
"feats": [
0.0670047476887703,
-0.20371121168136597,
0.11159612238407135,
-0.044489603489637375,
0.5870617628097534,
0.26764991879463196,
0.0032764205243438482,
1.1808034181594849,
0.7910705804824829,
0.01891493983566761,
-0.758421003818512,
... |
N | 3 | 4 | 3 | 480 | Male | Train | ... because the new public square and therefore it violates their rights. they will often point to two different lawsuits in making this argument, one is pruneyard and the other is packing- | [
{
"feats": [
0.13724176585674286,
-0.24139992892742157,
0.19724887609481812,
-0.058940351009368896,
0.6261369585990906,
0.2911434769630432,
-0.0009073886321857572,
1.2077277898788452,
0.7863050103187561,
0.021475862711668015,
-0.6610545516014099,... |
N | 3 | 3 | 3 | 480 | Male | Train | ... ham, and these two cases come up and they've been brought up in a whole bunch of lawsuits. and i'll just say that every time they've been brought up in a lawsuit to argue that a social media- | [
{
"feats": [
0.17374995350837708,
-0.22921445965766907,
0.11018656939268112,
0.028411561623215675,
0.6473510265350342,
0.25761857628822327,
-0.03017767332494259,
1.2332768440246582,
0.7878813743591309,
0.04733773320913315,
-0.6223092079162598,
... |
C | 6 | 2 | 6 | 480 | Male | Train | ... site is the public square, they have failed. and i have not seen a single judge anywhere agree that these things make any sense in this context. | [
{
"feats": [
0.04841821268200874,
-0.18049627542495728,
0.1728086620569229,
-0.004703011363744736,
0.6703363060951233,
0.26878494024276733,
0.046189598739147186,
1.2876142263412476,
0.7678021788597107,
-0.042522504925727844,
-0.5968571901321411,
... |
N | 3 | 4 | 3 | 480 | Male | Train | but, just to give the quick background on the two cases and they go deep and i'm going to give as high level as i can, and as quick as i can... | [
{
"feats": [
0.17321693897247314,
-0.19523274898529053,
0.13398844003677368,
-0.11504743248224258,
0.6783446669578552,
0.3045347034931183,
-0.01631845347583294,
1.259556531906128,
0.7421022057533264,
-0.06258735060691833,
-0.6514843106269836,
... |
A | 5 | 4.833333 | 4.833333 | 480 | Male | Train | ... pruneyard was a case about a mall that was trying to kick people out effectively, and it was argued that the mall was a gathering- | [
{
"feats": [
0.1320517510175705,
-0.19408820569515228,
0.18415719270706177,
-0.06526783853769302,
0.6828206181526184,
0.2829952836036682,
-0.02395501732826233,
1.250152349472046,
0.6835004091262817,
0.0200772937387228,
-0.7129684686660767,
... |
N | 6 | 5 | 5 | 480 | Male | Train | ... place and became the de facto public square, and that took away some of the rights of the private property owner that owned them all to kick people out.and the court said- | [
{
"feats": [
0.11501774936914444,
-0.13863633573055267,
0.13769741356372833,
-0.029232140630483627,
0.6897687911987305,
0.25545260310173035,
-0.10864710807800293,
1.240980625152588,
0.7979140877723694,
-0.04208848997950554,
-0.6820045113563538,
... |
U | 7 | 6 | 5 | 480 | Male | Train | ... that it was a de facto public square, and they could not kick people out. now, it is an extraordinarily limited ruling and extraordinarily focused on the facts of that case, which was that this- | [
{
"feats": [
0.1028168648481369,
-0.3072045147418976,
0.19013729691505432,
-0.01264819037169218,
0.5995482802391052,
0.3231286108493805,
0.02869967371225357,
1.2638658285140991,
0.652896523475647,
0.024805018678307533,
-0.6842165589332581,
... |
N | 3 | 4 | 4 | 480 | Male | Train | ... was effectively the only place in town that anyone could gather that the mall owner acted as a local government and was- | [
{
"feats": [
0.11626354604959488,
-0.12747794389724731,
0.16378720104694366,
-0.007422064431011677,
0.6330848336219788,
0.34093499183654785,
0.016704095527529716,
1.2710411548614502,
0.6735594272613525,
0.04951058328151703,
-0.7846883535385132,
... |
H | 6 | 4 | 4 | 480 | Male | Train | ... very, very narrow situation, which is basically pruneyard and pruneyard alone. you can't just say that something is a public square. the packingham case is a more recent case, it- | [
{
"feats": [
0.0938895121216774,
-0.20921121537685394,
0.18787258863449097,
-0.05385874956846237,
0.658477783203125,
0.33140116930007935,
-0.01387930940836668,
1.236997365951538,
0.7575855851173401,
0.027285367250442505,
-0.6080800890922546,
... |
N | 3 | 4 | 4 | 480 | Male | Train | ... was a supreme court case that kicked out a state law that was basically saying if criminals had done some sort of criminal activity online, part of their punishment could be that they- | [
{
"feats": [
0.06329219788312912,
-0.19191421568393707,
0.17691665887832642,
-0.007283736020326614,
0.531524121761322,
0.23140592873096466,
0.07011467963457108,
1.175668478012085,
0.6959942579269409,
0.03725317865610123,
-0.7433925867080688,
... |
A | 7 | 2 | 6 | 480 | Male | Train | ... are barred from using the internet. and the supreme court said, "you cannot pass a law that kicks people off of the internet because the internet is so essential to people- | [
{
"feats": [
0.15291215479373932,
-0.20214182138442993,
0.10447003692388535,
-0.03448265418410301,
0.6923275589942932,
0.2791418731212616,
-0.006180717144161463,
1.3288493156433105,
0.7344597578048706,
0.015260105952620506,
-0.6359634399414062,
... |
A | 7 | 2 | 7 | 480 | Male | Train | ... 's lives and ability to work and all of that kind of stuff.so people have taken that to me like, oh, then the services themselves can not kick- | [
{
"feats": [
0.03387245908379555,
-0.27646368741989136,
0.2324925661087036,
-0.015557200647890568,
0.7211936712265015,
0.3843913674354553,
0.07061899453401566,
1.2936556339263916,
0.7887710332870483,
-0.02563091553747654,
-0.7430446147918701,
... |
N | 3 | 4 | 3 | 480 | Male | Train | .. people off, but that is not what the case has said. it has just said that the government can not pass a law that forces people offline. there is- | [
{
"feats": [
0.10790207237005234,
-0.255526602268219,
0.13114604353904724,
-0.03632689267396927,
0.6772561073303223,
0.27406105399131775,
0.07279551774263382,
1.302588701248169,
0.7539598941802979,
0.04135393723845482,
-0.7388362288475037,
... |
A | 6 | 1 | 6 | 480 | Male | Train | ... a third case that people never mentioned, but is the most important case. it was just decided last summer, and that is the manhattan news network case. and, this- | [
{
"feats": [
0.11937778443098068,
-0.19682149589061737,
0.15433448553085327,
-0.01594909466803074,
0.5871644616127014,
0.30448001623153687,
0.0567065104842186,
1.2348425388336182,
0.6446309685707092,
0.03435223549604416,
-0.7341163754463196,
... |
H | 4 | 3 | 3 | 480 | Male | Train | ... was the case and we'll get into the details, but what the supreme court ruling just last year, and it was written by brett kavanaugh, who was the most recent appointment. and his ruling- | [
{
"feats": [
0.10242290049791336,
-0.1873725950717926,
0.16963116824626923,
-0.039248865097761154,
0.6381492614746094,
0.3254801630973816,
-0.0024375382345169783,
1.194506287574768,
0.6680271029472351,
-0.037105999886989594,
-0.6842159628868103,
... |
N | 4 | 4 | 4 | 480 | Male | Train | ... said that, you can't just declare any place where people can speak, even if a lot of people speak there, a public square and- | [
{
"feats": [
0.09721031785011292,
-0.22180140018463135,
0.1467713862657547,
0.0002694468421395868,
0.6548978090286255,
0.34812769293785095,
0.04043040797114372,
1.266655683517456,
0.6758800745010376,
0.0011901668040081859,
-0.7333363890647888,
... |
N | 5 | 3 | 4 | 480 | Male | Train | ... it doesn't become a state action, it doesn't take on government control. the idea that something is a public square or that there's state action involved from a private company only applies- | [
{
"feats": [
0.07299523800611496,
-0.219700887799263,
0.14642038941383362,
-0.03103497624397278,
0.6578149795532227,
0.27367326617240906,
-0.017542142421007156,
1.1298545598983765,
0.715571939945221,
0.042763639241456985,
-0.7688890695571899,
... |
A | 5 | 2 | 6 | 480 | Male | Train | ... government. and that ruling makes it very clear that things that twitter and facebook and youtube and every other website out there do, does not qualify, they are not replacing government, they are- | [
{
"feats": [
0.08184618502855301,
-0.16151629388332367,
0.21595525741577148,
0.029005080461502075,
0.6207199096679688,
0.24611110985279083,
-0.00791259203106165,
1.2716102600097656,
0.7169839143753052,
0.01602899469435215,
-0.7200486063957214,
... |
H | 4 | 4 | 3 | 480 | Male | Train | ... not offering services that were traditionally only given by the government.right, this basically means that if the sites that do perform services that are exclusive, but service provided by the government, it would be an exam- | [
{
"feats": [
0.15604755282402039,
-0.23812562227249146,
0.14433860778808594,
0.029714394360780716,
0.6066506505012512,
0.2804630696773529,
-0.05439768731594086,
1.219204068183899,
0.8086065053939819,
0.025153903290629387,
-0.7414007782936096,
... |
H | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1,328 | Female | Train | ... aple like, if the government decided that all tax reimbursement would be done entirely online and no longer through the us postal service and therefore that with- | [
{
"feats": [
0.0690624862909317,
-0.2040860950946808,
0.21126317977905273,
0.05024196207523346,
0.6221994161605835,
0.27720800042152405,
0.037688687443733215,
1.291490912437439,
0.7462735772132874,
0.039647649973630905,
-0.6854802370071411,
... |
H | 3 | 4 | 3 | 1,328 | Female | Train | ... then have to comply with being treated as a thing that would have these provisions on it. right. there could be an example, something that was traditionally and exclusively handled by the government. | [
{
"feats": [
0.10893625766038895,
-0.20649228990077972,
0.14334562420845032,
0.036347489804029465,
0.6237933039665222,
0.3390084505081177,
0.03570975735783577,
1.21039879322052,
0.7029780149459839,
0.007070348598062992,
-0.7533581256866455,
... |
H | 4 | 4 | 4 | 480 | Male | Train | so i could see an argument where someone could not be kicked off or blocked, because that would imply state action issues. now let's talk about the news- | [
{
"feats": [
0.12372148782014847,
-0.16419658064842224,
0.12500305473804474,
-0.04541170597076416,
0.6552804112434387,
0.2998277544975281,
0.019354095682501793,
1.2329398393630981,
0.738322913646698,
-0.002762202639132738,
-0.681068480014801,
... |
H | 4 | 4 | 4 | 1,328 | Female | Train | ... has a way to explain what cda 230 is and isn't. we've explained and debunked some of the myths and framings around arguments of platforms and publishers- | [
{
"feats": [
0.07959301024675369,
-0.20688983798027039,
0.20331211388111115,
-0.08648470044136047,
0.7139800190925598,
0.250662624835968,
-0.019717928022146225,
1.275551199913025,
0.7979370355606079,
0.02319866418838501,
-0.7206608057022095,
... |
H | 3 | 4 | 4 | 1,328 | Female | Train | ... and analogies to phone systems. so now let's actually just talk very briefly about the recent executive order that was issued this week, because this- | [
{
"feats": [
0.03583643585443497,
-0.17493663728237152,
0.22279474139213562,
-0.055401761084795,
0.6822533011436462,
0.37297362089157104,
0.028347084298729897,
1.3399800062179565,
0.7371864914894104,
-0.013114547356963158,
-0.7407790422439575,
... |
H | 5 | 5 | 7 | 1,328 | Female | Train | ... shows purpose. it's to tease apart what's hype, what's real. and this is very rich in that very domain. let's talk about what the executive order can and can't- | [
{
"feats": [
0.0923251211643219,
-0.20080377161502838,
0.1873459368944168,
0.026695026084780693,
0.5739969611167908,
0.2883794605731964,
0.025730866938829422,
1.234721064567566,
0.7781199216842651,
0.020162232220172882,
-0.6601367592811584,
... |
H | 3 | 4 | 3 | 480 | Male | Train | ... do here. or what it purports to do and doesn't do.right. there were drafts of this kind of executive order that made the rounds over the last two years. this is something- | [
{
"feats": [
0.11588479578495026,
-0.2686232626438141,
0.2603326737880707,
-0.15104511380195618,
0.6799858212471008,
0.30929577350616455,
0.013244452886283398,
1.2727446556091309,
0.7705252766609192,
-0.06323559582233429,
-0.6921295523643494,
... |
N | 3 | 4 | 4 | 480 | Male | Train | ... that the white house has been thinking about. i reported on it, and a number of other news sites reported on it, and different drafts were leaked out to the press- | [
{
"feats": [
0.11013172566890717,
-0.16246308386325836,
0.20383457839488983,
-0.01640244945883751,
0.5982415080070496,
0.24196526408195496,
0.006915517151355743,
1.0391111373901367,
0.6895647048950195,
0.09002483636140823,
-0.7605959177017212,
... |
N | 3 | 3 | 3 | 480 | Male | Train | ... all about these earlier versions of this executive order. and the story is, is that in the past, they've passed this around to different agencies like the- | [
{
"feats": [
0.08432379364967346,
-0.21219587326049805,
0.16500025987625122,
0.047333087772130966,
0.6321112513542175,
0.29355448484420776,
0.006976020522415638,
1.1914081573486328,
0.735356867313385,
0.054835718125104904,
-0.8074781894683838,
... |
H | 3 | 4 | 3 | 480 | Male | Train | ... and the ftc. and the message that the white house got back was that this was unconstitutional, and they couldn't do any of this. but it seemed that they took it out of the drawer and- | [
{
"feats": [
0.07194767892360687,
-0.1512741595506668,
0.1322764903306961,
-0.052335504442453384,
0.6485044360160828,
0.23909099400043488,
-0.02286497876048088,
1.2037310600280762,
0.7071778774261475,
-0.0713706910610199,
-0.6778159141540527,
... |
A | 6 | 1 | 6 | 480 | Male | Train | ... it off and put a fresh coat of paint on it. and it says a lot of very angry stuff about the internet services and- | [
{
"feats": [
0.08104231208562851,
-0.22106851637363434,
0.1576516479253769,
0.020454468205571175,
0.6412785053253174,
0.35021308064460754,
-0.014333724975585938,
1.203167200088501,
0.6822459697723389,
0.06282387673854828,
-0.8242194056510925,
... |
N | 4 | 3 | 3 | 480 | Male | Train | ... platforms and the way that they handle moderation. there's seven different sections. and the two sort of scary-ish parts of the executive order that are concerning is that to one- | [
{
"feats": [
0.14206966757774353,
-0.1967010349035263,
0.24409383535385132,
-0.008652552962303162,
0.5606040954589844,
0.29930463433265686,
0.017457501962780952,
1.1878150701522827,
0.6758047342300415,
-0.006041983608156443,
-0.7310817241668701,
... |
X | 5.8 | 3.2 | 5 | 480 | Male | Train | ... is totally at odds with both what is written in the law, and what 20 years of case law have said. and that's worrisome only to the extent- | [
{
"feats": [
0.16006235778331757,
-0.17779704928398132,
0.18703937530517578,
-0.028446156531572342,
0.6245258450508118,
0.39095380902290344,
0.004229519050568342,
1.2709327936172485,
0.7088661789894104,
0.010258241556584835,
-0.8207468390464783,
... |
H | 4 | 3 | 3 | 480 | Male | Train | ... made it extremely clear that the fcc has no authority whatsoever to regulate websites: none, zero, zilch. it's not even an open question. | [
{
"feats": [
0.09416904300451279,
-0.17500856518745422,
0.23771525919437408,
0.018408983945846558,
0.5717761516571045,
0.33451148867607117,
0.05911456421017647,
1.2788902521133423,
0.7099462151527405,
0.0023856586776673794,
-0.6875737309455872,
... |
H | 3 | 4 | 3 | 1,328 | Female | Train | what it can do and can't do, because it comes up a lot. fcc can do this, can't do that. it cannot make laws, but it does have the ability to- | [
{
"feats": [
0.07907461374998093,
-0.2706615924835205,
0.11649298667907715,
-0.07575233280658722,
0.7133762240409851,
0.2994455099105835,
0.0014879286754876375,
1.4350279569625854,
0.7828224897384644,
-0.06828095763921738,
-0.5645890831947327,
... |
H | 4 | 3 | 4 | 1,328 | Female | Train | ... interpret existing laws and put out certain rule-making things. they do these requests for comments, which create public records of people's commentary and whatnot. | [
{
"feats": [
0.09489461034536362,
-0.268777072429657,
0.1784822791814804,
-0.019278772175312042,
0.6134254932403564,
0.2975364625453949,
-0.008318067528307438,
1.3412284851074219,
0.7983869314193726,
-0.05450255423784256,
-0.5872085094451904,
... |
N | 4 | 4 | 4 | 1,328 | Female | Train | they also have the power to ask for documents. they can do distracting things, but they may not have legal making authority. so i think it'd be very helpful for you to break- | [
{
"feats": [
0.09766891598701477,
-0.22798188030719757,
0.17950227856636047,
-0.030092615634202957,
0.6536501049995422,
0.29627448320388794,
-0.04464685916900635,
1.3649888038635254,
0.7810942530632019,
-0.02972017601132393,
-0.6749853491783142,
... |
H | 4 | 4 | 3 | 1,328 | Female | Train | ... it down a bit more specifically, hear what they can get away with, and also can't. yeah, they can do rule making. and that is a long, involved process. | [
{
"feats": [
0.14042457938194275,
-0.23527058959007263,
0.1420440673828125,
-0.035637017339468,
0.6343759894371033,
0.2888162434101105,
-0.048769157379865646,
1.1735341548919678,
0.7045917510986328,
-0.0317511260509491,
-0.6132957339286804,
... |
N | 3 | 3 | 4 | 480 | Male | Train | and interestingly, because it is an independent agency, the president cannot instruct them to do something. so the executive order instructs the ntia, which is part of the- | [
{
"feats": [
0.15828031301498413,
-0.21559663116931915,
0.12009480595588684,
-0.0121134789660573,
0.5917125344276428,
0.29986146092414856,
0.010279562324285507,
1.155251383781433,
0.706822395324707,
0.008893690072000027,
-0.7463846802711487,
... |
H | 3 | 4 | 3 | 480 | Male | Train | ... department, to ask the fcc to do this. technically, the fcc does not need to do this, but the fcc will certainly feel the pressure to probably do- | [
{
"feats": [
0.0695013478398323,
-0.18805302679538727,
0.154801607131958,
-0.038094907999038696,
0.6485016942024231,
0.3086856007575989,
-0.02417386882007122,
1.241054892539978,
0.7095917463302612,
-0.06436320394277573,
-0.6702872514724731,
... |
H | 4 | 3 | 3 | 480 | Male | Train | ... something. the fcc could certainly create a lot of nuisance. and yes, there will be comment periods. people will have to testify and put in comments, as we saw with the- | [
{
"feats": [
0.09853477030992508,
-0.17603865265846252,
0.15451867878437042,
-0.097696453332901,
0.6556029915809631,
0.35053810477256775,
0.04002055525779724,
1.2166917324066162,
0.744172215461731,
0.022387787699699402,
-0.7578549385070801,
... |
N | 4 | 4 | 3 | 480 | Male | Train | it can make rule making, and then it can do something to enforce that rule making. if the rule making covers things that it has authorized, the- | [
{
"feats": [
0.09051695466041565,
-0.20881740748882294,
0.23958957195281982,
-0.008256419561803341,
0.635171115398407,
0.3831850588321686,
0.05501025170087814,
1.1267540454864502,
0.671610951423645,
-0.021834582090377808,
-0.6684490442276001,
... |
A | 4.666667 | 2.166667 | 5.5 | 480 | Male | Train | ... has never said that websites are within the fcc's jurisdiction. and the main court case that tested the theory that websites were in the fcc's jurisdiction has said no. one other thing that i do want to- | [
{
"feats": [
0.08871015906333923,
-0.13605085015296936,
0.20510274171829224,
-0.03192668408155441,
0.6125212907791138,
0.2601723074913025,
-0.006454505026340485,
1.2012176513671875,
0.7684807181358337,
-0.01831897720694542,
-0.6565618515014648,
... |
N | 3 | 3 | 3 | 480 | Male | Train | ... note about the executive order, and the request to the fcc, is that it is couched in a term that totally misinterprets cda 230.which is? | [
{
"feats": [
0.13019193708896637,
-0.16561035811901093,
0.08095814287662506,
-0.07260816544294357,
0.6006473898887634,
0.2897675931453705,
-0.040936388075351715,
1.1946601867675781,
0.6816956996917725,
0.0030388440936803818,
-0.6826785206794739,
... |
N | 4 | 4 | 4 | 480 | Male | Train | earlier i talked about the two different parts of the cda, that one is about liability on third-party content. and one is about the platform's protection in moderation. and there are a- | [
{
"feats": [
0.10946979373693466,
-0.2521134316921234,
0.13611102104187012,
-0.005588439293205738,
0.5888736844062805,
0.22590641677379608,
-0.023964932188391685,
1.172719955444336,
0.6856040954589844,
-0.02202318049967289,
-0.6872657537460327,
... |
C | 3.833333 | 2.166667 | 4.666667 | 480 | Male | Train | ... few, very narrow conditions on that moderation ability. it says it has to be in good faith, and there's a list of different kinds of content that you can moderate- | [
{
"feats": [
0.10913713276386261,
-0.20635931193828583,
0.14751176536083221,
-0.018390122801065445,
0.5910991430282593,
0.35881856083869934,
0.07541437447071075,
1.2681177854537964,
0.688358724117279,
0.035372789949178696,
-0.8343930840492249,
... |
H | 3 | 3 | 3 | 480 | Male | Train | ... faith would open up a whole other first amendment can of worms. but what the instructions to the fcc indicate is that those limitations, the good faith, otherwise- | [
{
"feats": [
0.11334078758955002,
-0.1928052306175232,
0.12704813480377197,
-0.08508110791444778,
0.6342757344245911,
0.21328547596931458,
-0.0430719368159771,
1.2325690984725952,
0.7192443013191223,
0.03992326930165291,
-0.6565399169921875,
... |
H | 4 | 3 | 3 | 480 | Male | Train | ... objectionable stuff; that somehow applies to the first part of cda 230, which is the part about not being responsible for a third-party content. | [
{
"feats": [
0.0801655575633049,
-0.2528049051761627,
0.1593019962310791,
0.012309222482144833,
0.575642466545105,
0.2785181999206543,
0.049937039613723755,
1.1986337900161743,
0.6922442317008972,
-0.01929282955825329,
-0.7354777455329895,
... |
N | 4 | 4 | 4 | 480 | Male | Train | that has never been the case. nobody's ever suggested it is the case. it has never shown up in any lawsuit. it has never been argued in a legitimate way, and- | [
{
"feats": [
0.11848319321870804,
-0.2073182910680771,
0.1666615903377533,
-0.004705436527729034,
0.6212155818939209,
0.3026852011680603,
0.008605164475739002,
1.2861965894699097,
0.8101205825805664,
-0.012247664853930473,
-0.6708933115005493,
... |
X | 5 | 3 | 4 | 480 | Male | Train | ... yet, the executive order suggests that the fcc should look into whether or not that interpretation makes sense. so you're basically saying that the two provisions of cda 230- | [
{
"feats": [
0.1553029865026474,
-0.2504310607910156,
0.12416303157806396,
-0.010461441241204739,
0.5499690771102905,
0.2756372392177582,
-0.021976932883262634,
1.2355707883834839,
0.6809336543083191,
-0.003920421004295349,
-0.692223310470581,
... |
A | 5 | 1.666667 | 6.666667 | 1,328 | Female | Train | ... that people are not liable for libelous content that their users might put on their site, or any other content their users might put on their sites. | [
{
"feats": [
0.1526096612215042,
-0.278288871049881,
0.07023238390684128,
-0.015760740265250206,
0.6287449598312378,
0.269366979598999,
-0.003239933168515563,
1.4134273529052734,
0.8372126221656799,
0.02735014259815216,
-0.7038621306419373,
... |
H | 3 | 5 | 5 | 1,328 | Female | Train | ... is being conflated in this case with the good faith aspect of being able to discretionally moderate in good faith.exactly. they're mixing those two things up. | [
{
"feats": [
0.11692158132791519,
-0.2726267874240875,
0.24881607294082642,
-0.05792168900370598,
0.5867014527320862,
0.3647504448890686,
0.018652526661753654,
1.2551952600479126,
0.6972562074661255,
-0.0051560066640377045,
-0.7465915083885193,
... |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.