url
stringclasses
147 values
commit
stringclasses
147 values
file_path
stringlengths
7
101
full_name
stringlengths
1
94
start
stringlengths
6
10
end
stringlengths
6
11
tactic
stringlengths
1
11.2k
state_before
stringlengths
3
2.09M
state_after
stringlengths
6
2.09M
input
stringlengths
73
2.09M
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Function.lean
SetTheory.eq_of_opair_mem_graph
[81, 1]
[89, 14]
intro ⟨t, ht, ht'⟩
case h.mpr V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x y z✝ a b c : V f : a ⟶ b h : opair x y ∈ f.graph z : V ⊢ (∃ z_1, opair x z_1 ∈ f.graph ∧ z ∈ z_1) → z ∈ y
case h.mpr V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x y z✝ a b c : V f : a ⟶ b h : opair x y ∈ f.graph z t : V ht : opair x t ∈ f.graph ht' : z ∈ t ⊢ z ∈ y
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h.mpr V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x y z✝ a b c : V f : a ⟶ b h : opair x y ∈ f.graph z : V ⊢ (∃ z_1, opair x z_1 ∈ f.graph ∧ z ∈ z_1) → z ∈ y TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Function.lean
SetTheory.eq_of_opair_mem_graph
[81, 1]
[89, 14]
cases f.isFunction.2 x y t h ht
case h.mpr V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x y z✝ a b c : V f : a ⟶ b h : opair x y ∈ f.graph z t : V ht : opair x t ∈ f.graph ht' : z ∈ t ⊢ z ∈ y
case h.mpr.refl V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x y z✝ a b c : V f : a ⟶ b h : opair x y ∈ f.graph z : V ht : opair x y ∈ f.graph ht' : z ∈ y ⊢ z ∈ y
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h.mpr V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x y z✝ a b c : V f : a ⟶ b h : opair x y ∈ f.graph z t : V ht : opair x t ∈ f.graph ht' : z ∈ t ⊢ z ∈ y TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Function.lean
SetTheory.eq_of_opair_mem_graph
[81, 1]
[89, 14]
exact ht'
case h.mpr.refl V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x y z✝ a b c : V f : a ⟶ b h : opair x y ∈ f.graph z : V ht : opair x y ∈ f.graph ht' : z ∈ y ⊢ z ∈ y
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h.mpr.refl V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x y z✝ a b c : V f : a ⟶ b h : opair x y ∈ f.graph z : V ht : opair x y ∈ f.graph ht' : z ∈ y ⊢ z ∈ y TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Function.lean
SetTheory.opair_mem_graph
[91, 1]
[96, 11]
have := mem_dom_of_mem f h
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x y z a b c : V f : a ⟶ b h : x ∈ a ⊢ opair x (apply f.graph x) ∈ f.graph
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x y z a b c : V f : a ⟶ b h : x ∈ a this : x ∈ dom f.graph ⊢ opair x (apply f.graph x) ∈ f.graph
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x y z a b c : V f : a ⟶ b h : x ∈ a ⊢ opair x (apply f.graph x) ∈ f.graph TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Function.lean
SetTheory.opair_mem_graph
[91, 1]
[96, 11]
rw [mem_dom_iff] at this
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x y z a b c : V f : a ⟶ b h : x ∈ a this : x ∈ dom f.graph ⊢ opair x (apply f.graph x) ∈ f.graph
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x y z a b c : V f : a ⟶ b h : x ∈ a this : ∃ z, opair x z ∈ f.graph ⊢ opair x (apply f.graph x) ∈ f.graph
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x y z a b c : V f : a ⟶ b h : x ∈ a this : x ∈ dom f.graph ⊢ opair x (apply f.graph x) ∈ f.graph TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Function.lean
SetTheory.opair_mem_graph
[91, 1]
[96, 11]
rcases this with ⟨y, hy⟩
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x y z a b c : V f : a ⟶ b h : x ∈ a this : ∃ z, opair x z ∈ f.graph ⊢ opair x (apply f.graph x) ∈ f.graph
case intro V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x y✝ z a b c : V f : a ⟶ b h : x ∈ a y : V hy : opair x y ∈ f.graph ⊢ opair x (apply f.graph x) ∈ f.graph
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x y z a b c : V f : a ⟶ b h : x ∈ a this : ∃ z, opair x z ∈ f.graph ⊢ opair x (apply f.graph x) ∈ f.graph TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Function.lean
SetTheory.opair_mem_graph
[91, 1]
[96, 11]
cases eq_of_opair_mem_graph f hy
case intro V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x y✝ z a b c : V f : a ⟶ b h : x ∈ a y : V hy : opair x y ∈ f.graph ⊢ opair x (apply f.graph x) ∈ f.graph
case intro.refl V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x y z a b c : V f : a ⟶ b h : x ∈ a hy : opair x (apply f.graph x) ∈ f.graph ⊢ opair x (apply f.graph x) ∈ f.graph
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case intro V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x y✝ z a b c : V f : a ⟶ b h : x ∈ a y : V hy : opair x y ∈ f.graph ⊢ opair x (apply f.graph x) ∈ f.graph TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Function.lean
SetTheory.opair_mem_graph
[91, 1]
[96, 11]
exact hy
case intro.refl V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x y z a b c : V f : a ⟶ b h : x ∈ a hy : opair x (apply f.graph x) ∈ f.graph ⊢ opair x (apply f.graph x) ∈ f.graph
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case intro.refl V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x y z a b c : V f : a ⟶ b h : x ∈ a hy : opair x (apply f.graph x) ∈ f.graph ⊢ opair x (apply f.graph x) ∈ f.graph TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Function.lean
SetTheory.opair_mem_graph_iff
[98, 1]
[102, 30]
constructor
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x y z a b c : V f : a ⟶ b h : x ∈ a ⊢ opair x y ∈ f.graph ↔ y = apply f.graph x
case mp V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x y z a b c : V f : a ⟶ b h : x ∈ a ⊢ opair x y ∈ f.graph → y = apply f.graph x case mpr V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x y z a b c : V f : a ⟶ b h : x ∈ a ⊢ y = apply f.graph x → opair x y ∈ f.graph
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x y z a b c : V f : a ⟶ b h : x ∈ a ⊢ opair x y ∈ f.graph ↔ y = apply f.graph x TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Function.lean
SetTheory.opair_mem_graph_iff
[98, 1]
[102, 30]
exact eq_of_opair_mem_graph f
case mp V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x y z a b c : V f : a ⟶ b h : x ∈ a ⊢ opair x y ∈ f.graph → y = apply f.graph x
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case mp V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x y z a b c : V f : a ⟶ b h : x ∈ a ⊢ opair x y ∈ f.graph → y = apply f.graph x TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Function.lean
SetTheory.opair_mem_graph_iff
[98, 1]
[102, 30]
rintro rfl
case mpr V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x y z a b c : V f : a ⟶ b h : x ∈ a ⊢ y = apply f.graph x → opair x y ∈ f.graph
case mpr V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x z a b c : V f : a ⟶ b h : x ∈ a ⊢ opair x (apply f.graph x) ∈ f.graph
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case mpr V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x y z a b c : V f : a ⟶ b h : x ∈ a ⊢ y = apply f.graph x → opair x y ∈ f.graph TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Function.lean
SetTheory.opair_mem_graph_iff
[98, 1]
[102, 30]
exact opair_mem_graph f h
case mpr V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x z a b c : V f : a ⟶ b h : x ∈ a ⊢ opair x (apply f.graph x) ∈ f.graph
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case mpr V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x z a b c : V f : a ⟶ b h : x ∈ a ⊢ opair x (apply f.graph x) ∈ f.graph TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Function.lean
SetTheory.Function.ext
[106, 1]
[130, 26]
suffices f.graph = g.graph from by cases f cases this rfl
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x y z a b c : V f g : a ⟶ b h : ∀ (x : V), x ∈ a → apply f.graph x = apply g.graph x ⊢ f = g
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x y z a b c : V f g : a ⟶ b h : ∀ (x : V), x ∈ a → apply f.graph x = apply g.graph x ⊢ f.graph = g.graph
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x y z a b c : V f g : a ⟶ b h : ∀ (x : V), x ∈ a → apply f.graph x = apply g.graph x ⊢ f = g TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Function.lean
SetTheory.Function.ext
[106, 1]
[130, 26]
ext x
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x y z a b c : V f g : a ⟶ b h : ∀ (x : V), x ∈ a → apply f.graph x = apply g.graph x ⊢ f.graph = g.graph
case h V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x✝ y z a b c : V f g : a ⟶ b h : ∀ (x : V), x ∈ a → apply f.graph x = apply g.graph x x : V ⊢ x ∈ f.graph ↔ x ∈ g.graph
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x y z a b c : V f g : a ⟶ b h : ∀ (x : V), x ∈ a → apply f.graph x = apply g.graph x ⊢ f.graph = g.graph TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Function.lean
SetTheory.Function.ext
[106, 1]
[130, 26]
constructor
case h V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x✝ y z a b c : V f g : a ⟶ b h : ∀ (x : V), x ∈ a → apply f.graph x = apply g.graph x x : V ⊢ x ∈ f.graph ↔ x ∈ g.graph
case h.mp V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x✝ y z a b c : V f g : a ⟶ b h : ∀ (x : V), x ∈ a → apply f.graph x = apply g.graph x x : V ⊢ x ∈ f.graph → x ∈ g.graph case h.mpr V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x✝ y z a b c : V f g : a ⟶ b h : ∀ (x : V), x ∈ a → apply f.graph x = apply g.graph x x : V ⊢ x ∈ g.graph → x ∈ f.graph
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x✝ y z a b c : V f g : a ⟶ b h : ∀ (x : V), x ∈ a → apply f.graph x = apply g.graph x x : V ⊢ x ∈ f.graph ↔ x ∈ g.graph TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Function.lean
SetTheory.Function.ext
[106, 1]
[130, 26]
cases f
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x y z a b c : V f g : a ⟶ b h : ∀ (x : V), x ∈ a → apply f.graph x = apply g.graph x this : f.graph = g.graph ⊢ f = g
case mk V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x y z a b c : V g : a ⟶ b graph✝ : V isFunction✝ : IsFunction graph✝ dom_eq✝ : dom graph✝ = a ran_subset✝ : ran graph✝ ⊆ b h : ∀ (x : V), x ∈ a → apply { graph := graph✝, isFunction := isFunction✝, dom_eq := dom_eq✝, ran_subset := ran_subset✝ }.graph x = apply g.graph x this : { graph := graph✝, isFunction := isFunction✝, dom_eq := dom_eq✝, ran_subset := ran_subset✝ }.graph = g.graph ⊢ { graph := graph✝, isFunction := isFunction✝, dom_eq := dom_eq✝, ran_subset := ran_subset✝ } = g
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x y z a b c : V f g : a ⟶ b h : ∀ (x : V), x ∈ a → apply f.graph x = apply g.graph x this : f.graph = g.graph ⊢ f = g TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Function.lean
SetTheory.Function.ext
[106, 1]
[130, 26]
cases this
case mk V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x y z a b c : V g : a ⟶ b graph✝ : V isFunction✝ : IsFunction graph✝ dom_eq✝ : dom graph✝ = a ran_subset✝ : ran graph✝ ⊆ b h : ∀ (x : V), x ∈ a → apply { graph := graph✝, isFunction := isFunction✝, dom_eq := dom_eq✝, ran_subset := ran_subset✝ }.graph x = apply g.graph x this : { graph := graph✝, isFunction := isFunction✝, dom_eq := dom_eq✝, ran_subset := ran_subset✝ }.graph = g.graph ⊢ { graph := graph✝, isFunction := isFunction✝, dom_eq := dom_eq✝, ran_subset := ran_subset✝ } = g
case mk.refl V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x y z a b c : V g : a ⟶ b isFunction✝ : IsFunction g.1 dom_eq✝ : dom g.1 = a ran_subset✝ : ran g.1 ⊆ b h : ∀ (x : V), x ∈ a → apply { graph := g.1, isFunction := isFunction✝, dom_eq := dom_eq✝, ran_subset := ran_subset✝ }.graph x = apply g.graph x ⊢ { graph := g.1, isFunction := isFunction✝, dom_eq := dom_eq✝, ran_subset := ran_subset✝ } = g
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case mk V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x y z a b c : V g : a ⟶ b graph✝ : V isFunction✝ : IsFunction graph✝ dom_eq✝ : dom graph✝ = a ran_subset✝ : ran graph✝ ⊆ b h : ∀ (x : V), x ∈ a → apply { graph := graph✝, isFunction := isFunction✝, dom_eq := dom_eq✝, ran_subset := ran_subset✝ }.graph x = apply g.graph x this : { graph := graph✝, isFunction := isFunction✝, dom_eq := dom_eq✝, ran_subset := ran_subset✝ }.graph = g.graph ⊢ { graph := graph✝, isFunction := isFunction✝, dom_eq := dom_eq✝, ran_subset := ran_subset✝ } = g TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Function.lean
SetTheory.Function.ext
[106, 1]
[130, 26]
rfl
case mk.refl V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x y z a b c : V g : a ⟶ b isFunction✝ : IsFunction g.1 dom_eq✝ : dom g.1 = a ran_subset✝ : ran g.1 ⊆ b h : ∀ (x : V), x ∈ a → apply { graph := g.1, isFunction := isFunction✝, dom_eq := dom_eq✝, ran_subset := ran_subset✝ }.graph x = apply g.graph x ⊢ { graph := g.1, isFunction := isFunction✝, dom_eq := dom_eq✝, ran_subset := ran_subset✝ } = g
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case mk.refl V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x y z a b c : V g : a ⟶ b isFunction✝ : IsFunction g.1 dom_eq✝ : dom g.1 = a ran_subset✝ : ran g.1 ⊆ b h : ∀ (x : V), x ∈ a → apply { graph := g.1, isFunction := isFunction✝, dom_eq := dom_eq✝, ran_subset := ran_subset✝ }.graph x = apply g.graph x ⊢ { graph := g.1, isFunction := isFunction✝, dom_eq := dom_eq✝, ran_subset := ran_subset✝ } = g TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Function.lean
SetTheory.Function.ext
[106, 1]
[130, 26]
intro hx
case h.mp V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x✝ y z a b c : V f g : a ⟶ b h : ∀ (x : V), x ∈ a → apply f.graph x = apply g.graph x x : V ⊢ x ∈ f.graph → x ∈ g.graph
case h.mp V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x✝ y z a b c : V f g : a ⟶ b h : ∀ (x : V), x ∈ a → apply f.graph x = apply g.graph x x : V hx : x ∈ f.graph ⊢ x ∈ g.graph
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h.mp V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x✝ y z a b c : V f g : a ⟶ b h : ∀ (x : V), x ∈ a → apply f.graph x = apply g.graph x x : V ⊢ x ∈ f.graph → x ∈ g.graph TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Function.lean
SetTheory.Function.ext
[106, 1]
[130, 26]
obtain ⟨x, y, rfl⟩ := f.isFunction.1 x hx
case h.mp V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x✝ y z a b c : V f g : a ⟶ b h : ∀ (x : V), x ∈ a → apply f.graph x = apply g.graph x x : V hx : x ∈ f.graph ⊢ x ∈ g.graph
case h.mp.intro.intro V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x✝ y✝ z a b c : V f g : a ⟶ b h : ∀ (x : V), x ∈ a → apply f.graph x = apply g.graph x x y : V hx : opair x y ∈ f.graph ⊢ opair x y ∈ g.graph
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h.mp V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x✝ y z a b c : V f g : a ⟶ b h : ∀ (x : V), x ∈ a → apply f.graph x = apply g.graph x x : V hx : x ∈ f.graph ⊢ x ∈ g.graph TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Function.lean
SetTheory.Function.ext
[106, 1]
[130, 26]
have : x ∈ a := by refine mem_of_mem_dom f ?_ rw [mem_dom_iff] exact ⟨y, hx⟩
case h.mp.intro.intro V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x✝ y✝ z a b c : V f g : a ⟶ b h : ∀ (x : V), x ∈ a → apply f.graph x = apply g.graph x x y : V hx : opair x y ∈ f.graph ⊢ opair x y ∈ g.graph
case h.mp.intro.intro V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x✝ y✝ z a b c : V f g : a ⟶ b h : ∀ (x : V), x ∈ a → apply f.graph x = apply g.graph x x y : V hx : opair x y ∈ f.graph this : x ∈ a ⊢ opair x y ∈ g.graph
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h.mp.intro.intro V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x✝ y✝ z a b c : V f g : a ⟶ b h : ∀ (x : V), x ∈ a → apply f.graph x = apply g.graph x x y : V hx : opair x y ∈ f.graph ⊢ opair x y ∈ g.graph TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Function.lean
SetTheory.Function.ext
[106, 1]
[130, 26]
rw [opair_mem_graph_iff _ this] at hx ⊢
case h.mp.intro.intro V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x✝ y✝ z a b c : V f g : a ⟶ b h : ∀ (x : V), x ∈ a → apply f.graph x = apply g.graph x x y : V hx : opair x y ∈ f.graph this : x ∈ a ⊢ opair x y ∈ g.graph
case h.mp.intro.intro V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x✝ y✝ z a b c : V f g : a ⟶ b h : ∀ (x : V), x ∈ a → apply f.graph x = apply g.graph x x y : V hx : y = apply f.graph x this : x ∈ a ⊢ y = apply g.graph x
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h.mp.intro.intro V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x✝ y✝ z a b c : V f g : a ⟶ b h : ∀ (x : V), x ∈ a → apply f.graph x = apply g.graph x x y : V hx : opair x y ∈ f.graph this : x ∈ a ⊢ opair x y ∈ g.graph TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Function.lean
SetTheory.Function.ext
[106, 1]
[130, 26]
rw [hx]
case h.mp.intro.intro V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x✝ y✝ z a b c : V f g : a ⟶ b h : ∀ (x : V), x ∈ a → apply f.graph x = apply g.graph x x y : V hx : y = apply f.graph x this : x ∈ a ⊢ y = apply g.graph x
case h.mp.intro.intro V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x✝ y✝ z a b c : V f g : a ⟶ b h : ∀ (x : V), x ∈ a → apply f.graph x = apply g.graph x x y : V hx : y = apply f.graph x this : x ∈ a ⊢ apply f.graph x = apply g.graph x
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h.mp.intro.intro V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x✝ y✝ z a b c : V f g : a ⟶ b h : ∀ (x : V), x ∈ a → apply f.graph x = apply g.graph x x y : V hx : y = apply f.graph x this : x ∈ a ⊢ y = apply g.graph x TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Function.lean
SetTheory.Function.ext
[106, 1]
[130, 26]
exact h _ this
case h.mp.intro.intro V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x✝ y✝ z a b c : V f g : a ⟶ b h : ∀ (x : V), x ∈ a → apply f.graph x = apply g.graph x x y : V hx : y = apply f.graph x this : x ∈ a ⊢ apply f.graph x = apply g.graph x
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h.mp.intro.intro V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x✝ y✝ z a b c : V f g : a ⟶ b h : ∀ (x : V), x ∈ a → apply f.graph x = apply g.graph x x y : V hx : y = apply f.graph x this : x ∈ a ⊢ apply f.graph x = apply g.graph x TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Function.lean
SetTheory.Function.ext
[106, 1]
[130, 26]
refine mem_of_mem_dom f ?_
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x✝ y✝ z a b c : V f g : a ⟶ b h : ∀ (x : V), x ∈ a → apply f.graph x = apply g.graph x x y : V hx : opair x y ∈ f.graph ⊢ x ∈ a
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x✝ y✝ z a b c : V f g : a ⟶ b h : ∀ (x : V), x ∈ a → apply f.graph x = apply g.graph x x y : V hx : opair x y ∈ f.graph ⊢ x ∈ dom f.graph
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x✝ y✝ z a b c : V f g : a ⟶ b h : ∀ (x : V), x ∈ a → apply f.graph x = apply g.graph x x y : V hx : opair x y ∈ f.graph ⊢ x ∈ a TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Function.lean
SetTheory.Function.ext
[106, 1]
[130, 26]
rw [mem_dom_iff]
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x✝ y✝ z a b c : V f g : a ⟶ b h : ∀ (x : V), x ∈ a → apply f.graph x = apply g.graph x x y : V hx : opair x y ∈ f.graph ⊢ x ∈ dom f.graph
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x✝ y✝ z a b c : V f g : a ⟶ b h : ∀ (x : V), x ∈ a → apply f.graph x = apply g.graph x x y : V hx : opair x y ∈ f.graph ⊢ ∃ z, opair x z ∈ f.graph
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x✝ y✝ z a b c : V f g : a ⟶ b h : ∀ (x : V), x ∈ a → apply f.graph x = apply g.graph x x y : V hx : opair x y ∈ f.graph ⊢ x ∈ dom f.graph TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Function.lean
SetTheory.Function.ext
[106, 1]
[130, 26]
exact ⟨y, hx⟩
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x✝ y✝ z a b c : V f g : a ⟶ b h : ∀ (x : V), x ∈ a → apply f.graph x = apply g.graph x x y : V hx : opair x y ∈ f.graph ⊢ ∃ z, opair x z ∈ f.graph
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x✝ y✝ z a b c : V f g : a ⟶ b h : ∀ (x : V), x ∈ a → apply f.graph x = apply g.graph x x y : V hx : opair x y ∈ f.graph ⊢ ∃ z, opair x z ∈ f.graph TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Function.lean
SetTheory.Function.ext
[106, 1]
[130, 26]
intro hx
case h.mpr V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x✝ y z a b c : V f g : a ⟶ b h : ∀ (x : V), x ∈ a → apply f.graph x = apply g.graph x x : V ⊢ x ∈ g.graph → x ∈ f.graph
case h.mpr V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x✝ y z a b c : V f g : a ⟶ b h : ∀ (x : V), x ∈ a → apply f.graph x = apply g.graph x x : V hx : x ∈ g.graph ⊢ x ∈ f.graph
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h.mpr V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x✝ y z a b c : V f g : a ⟶ b h : ∀ (x : V), x ∈ a → apply f.graph x = apply g.graph x x : V ⊢ x ∈ g.graph → x ∈ f.graph TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Function.lean
SetTheory.Function.ext
[106, 1]
[130, 26]
obtain ⟨x, y, rfl⟩ := g.isFunction.1 x hx
case h.mpr V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x✝ y z a b c : V f g : a ⟶ b h : ∀ (x : V), x ∈ a → apply f.graph x = apply g.graph x x : V hx : x ∈ g.graph ⊢ x ∈ f.graph
case h.mpr.intro.intro V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x✝ y✝ z a b c : V f g : a ⟶ b h : ∀ (x : V), x ∈ a → apply f.graph x = apply g.graph x x y : V hx : opair x y ∈ g.graph ⊢ opair x y ∈ f.graph
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h.mpr V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x✝ y z a b c : V f g : a ⟶ b h : ∀ (x : V), x ∈ a → apply f.graph x = apply g.graph x x : V hx : x ∈ g.graph ⊢ x ∈ f.graph TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Function.lean
SetTheory.Function.ext
[106, 1]
[130, 26]
have : x ∈ a := by refine mem_of_mem_dom g ?_ rw [mem_dom_iff] exact ⟨y, hx⟩
case h.mpr.intro.intro V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x✝ y✝ z a b c : V f g : a ⟶ b h : ∀ (x : V), x ∈ a → apply f.graph x = apply g.graph x x y : V hx : opair x y ∈ g.graph ⊢ opair x y ∈ f.graph
case h.mpr.intro.intro V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x✝ y✝ z a b c : V f g : a ⟶ b h : ∀ (x : V), x ∈ a → apply f.graph x = apply g.graph x x y : V hx : opair x y ∈ g.graph this : x ∈ a ⊢ opair x y ∈ f.graph
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h.mpr.intro.intro V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x✝ y✝ z a b c : V f g : a ⟶ b h : ∀ (x : V), x ∈ a → apply f.graph x = apply g.graph x x y : V hx : opair x y ∈ g.graph ⊢ opair x y ∈ f.graph TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Function.lean
SetTheory.Function.ext
[106, 1]
[130, 26]
rw [opair_mem_graph_iff _ this] at hx ⊢
case h.mpr.intro.intro V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x✝ y✝ z a b c : V f g : a ⟶ b h : ∀ (x : V), x ∈ a → apply f.graph x = apply g.graph x x y : V hx : opair x y ∈ g.graph this : x ∈ a ⊢ opair x y ∈ f.graph
case h.mpr.intro.intro V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x✝ y✝ z a b c : V f g : a ⟶ b h : ∀ (x : V), x ∈ a → apply f.graph x = apply g.graph x x y : V hx : y = apply g.graph x this : x ∈ a ⊢ y = apply f.graph x
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h.mpr.intro.intro V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x✝ y✝ z a b c : V f g : a ⟶ b h : ∀ (x : V), x ∈ a → apply f.graph x = apply g.graph x x y : V hx : opair x y ∈ g.graph this : x ∈ a ⊢ opair x y ∈ f.graph TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Function.lean
SetTheory.Function.ext
[106, 1]
[130, 26]
rw [hx]
case h.mpr.intro.intro V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x✝ y✝ z a b c : V f g : a ⟶ b h : ∀ (x : V), x ∈ a → apply f.graph x = apply g.graph x x y : V hx : y = apply g.graph x this : x ∈ a ⊢ y = apply f.graph x
case h.mpr.intro.intro V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x✝ y✝ z a b c : V f g : a ⟶ b h : ∀ (x : V), x ∈ a → apply f.graph x = apply g.graph x x y : V hx : y = apply g.graph x this : x ∈ a ⊢ apply g.graph x = apply f.graph x
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h.mpr.intro.intro V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x✝ y✝ z a b c : V f g : a ⟶ b h : ∀ (x : V), x ∈ a → apply f.graph x = apply g.graph x x y : V hx : y = apply g.graph x this : x ∈ a ⊢ y = apply f.graph x TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Function.lean
SetTheory.Function.ext
[106, 1]
[130, 26]
exact (h _ this).symm
case h.mpr.intro.intro V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x✝ y✝ z a b c : V f g : a ⟶ b h : ∀ (x : V), x ∈ a → apply f.graph x = apply g.graph x x y : V hx : y = apply g.graph x this : x ∈ a ⊢ apply g.graph x = apply f.graph x
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h.mpr.intro.intro V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x✝ y✝ z a b c : V f g : a ⟶ b h : ∀ (x : V), x ∈ a → apply f.graph x = apply g.graph x x y : V hx : y = apply g.graph x this : x ∈ a ⊢ apply g.graph x = apply f.graph x TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Function.lean
SetTheory.Function.ext
[106, 1]
[130, 26]
refine mem_of_mem_dom g ?_
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x✝ y✝ z a b c : V f g : a ⟶ b h : ∀ (x : V), x ∈ a → apply f.graph x = apply g.graph x x y : V hx : opair x y ∈ g.graph ⊢ x ∈ a
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x✝ y✝ z a b c : V f g : a ⟶ b h : ∀ (x : V), x ∈ a → apply f.graph x = apply g.graph x x y : V hx : opair x y ∈ g.graph ⊢ x ∈ dom g.graph
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x✝ y✝ z a b c : V f g : a ⟶ b h : ∀ (x : V), x ∈ a → apply f.graph x = apply g.graph x x y : V hx : opair x y ∈ g.graph ⊢ x ∈ a TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Function.lean
SetTheory.Function.ext
[106, 1]
[130, 26]
rw [mem_dom_iff]
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x✝ y✝ z a b c : V f g : a ⟶ b h : ∀ (x : V), x ∈ a → apply f.graph x = apply g.graph x x y : V hx : opair x y ∈ g.graph ⊢ x ∈ dom g.graph
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x✝ y✝ z a b c : V f g : a ⟶ b h : ∀ (x : V), x ∈ a → apply f.graph x = apply g.graph x x y : V hx : opair x y ∈ g.graph ⊢ ∃ z, opair x z ∈ g.graph
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x✝ y✝ z a b c : V f g : a ⟶ b h : ∀ (x : V), x ∈ a → apply f.graph x = apply g.graph x x y : V hx : opair x y ∈ g.graph ⊢ x ∈ dom g.graph TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Function.lean
SetTheory.Function.ext
[106, 1]
[130, 26]
exact ⟨y, hx⟩
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x✝ y✝ z a b c : V f g : a ⟶ b h : ∀ (x : V), x ∈ a → apply f.graph x = apply g.graph x x y : V hx : opair x y ∈ g.graph ⊢ ∃ z, opair x z ∈ g.graph
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x✝ y✝ z a b c : V f g : a ⟶ b h : ∀ (x : V), x ∈ a → apply f.graph x = apply g.graph x x y : V hx : opair x y ∈ g.graph ⊢ ∃ z, opair x z ∈ g.graph TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/OPair.lean
SetTheory.mem_π₂_iff
[31, 1]
[33, 8]
unfold π₂
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z : V ⊢ y ∈ π₂ x ↔ ∃ z, y ∈ z ∧ z ∈ ⋃ x ∧ (⋃ x ≠ ⋂ x → ¬z ∈ ⋂ x)
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z : V ⊢ y ∈ ⋃ sep (BoundedFormula.imp (BoundedFormula.ne (Sum.inl true) (Sum.inl false)) (BoundedFormula.not (BoundedFormula.mem (Sum.inr 0) (Sum.inl false)))) (fun i => if i = true then ⋃ x else ⋂ x) (⋃ x) ↔ ∃ z, y ∈ z ∧ z ∈ ⋃ x ∧ (⋃ x ≠ ⋂ x → ¬z ∈ ⋂ x)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z : V ⊢ y ∈ π₂ x ↔ ∃ z, y ∈ z ∧ z ∈ ⋃ x ∧ (⋃ x ≠ ⋂ x → ¬z ∈ ⋂ x) TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/OPair.lean
SetTheory.mem_π₂_iff
[31, 1]
[33, 8]
aesop
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z : V ⊢ y ∈ ⋃ sep (BoundedFormula.imp (BoundedFormula.ne (Sum.inl true) (Sum.inl false)) (BoundedFormula.not (BoundedFormula.mem (Sum.inr 0) (Sum.inl false)))) (fun i => if i = true then ⋃ x else ⋂ x) (⋃ x) ↔ ∃ z, y ∈ z ∧ z ∈ ⋃ x ∧ (⋃ x ≠ ⋂ x → ¬z ∈ ⋂ x)
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z : V ⊢ y ∈ ⋃ sep (BoundedFormula.imp (BoundedFormula.ne (Sum.inl true) (Sum.inl false)) (BoundedFormula.not (BoundedFormula.mem (Sum.inr 0) (Sum.inl false)))) (fun i => if i = true then ⋃ x else ⋂ x) (⋃ x) ↔ ∃ z, y ∈ z ∧ z ∈ ⋃ x ∧ (⋃ x ≠ ⋂ x → ¬z ∈ ⋂ x) TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/OPair.lean
SetTheory.π₁_opair
[36, 1]
[39, 8]
unfold π₁ opair
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z : V ⊢ π₁ (opair x y) = x
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z : V ⊢ ⋃ ⋂ pair {x} (pair x y) = x
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z : V ⊢ π₁ (opair x y) = x TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/OPair.lean
SetTheory.π₁_opair
[36, 1]
[39, 8]
ext z
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z : V ⊢ ⋃ ⋂ pair {x} (pair x y) = x
case h V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z✝ z : V ⊢ z ∈ ⋃ ⋂ pair {x} (pair x y) ↔ z ∈ x
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z : V ⊢ ⋃ ⋂ pair {x} (pair x y) = x TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/OPair.lean
SetTheory.π₁_opair
[36, 1]
[39, 8]
aesop
case h V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z✝ z : V ⊢ z ∈ ⋃ ⋂ pair {x} (pair x y) ↔ z ∈ x
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z✝ z : V ⊢ z ∈ ⋃ ⋂ pair {x} (pair x y) ↔ z ∈ x TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/OPair.lean
SetTheory.π₂_opair
[42, 1]
[53, 10]
unfold opair
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z : V ⊢ π₂ (opair x y) = y
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z : V ⊢ π₂ (pair {x} (pair x y)) = y
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z : V ⊢ π₂ (opair x y) = y TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/OPair.lean
SetTheory.π₂_opair
[42, 1]
[53, 10]
ext z
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z : V ⊢ π₂ (pair {x} (pair x y)) = y
case h V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z✝ z : V ⊢ z ∈ π₂ (pair {x} (pair x y)) ↔ z ∈ y
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z : V ⊢ π₂ (pair {x} (pair x y)) = y TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/OPair.lean
SetTheory.π₂_opair
[42, 1]
[53, 10]
rw [mem_π₂_iff]
case h V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z✝ z : V ⊢ z ∈ π₂ (pair {x} (pair x y)) ↔ z ∈ y
case h V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z✝ z : V ⊢ (∃ z_1, z ∈ z_1 ∧ z_1 ∈ ⋃ pair {x} (pair x y) ∧ (⋃ pair {x} (pair x y) ≠ ⋂ pair {x} (pair x y) → ¬z_1 ∈ ⋂ pair {x} (pair x y))) ↔ z ∈ y
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z✝ z : V ⊢ z ∈ π₂ (pair {x} (pair x y)) ↔ z ∈ y TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/OPair.lean
SetTheory.π₂_opair
[42, 1]
[53, 10]
simp only [sUnion_pair, sInter_pair, ne_eq, union_pair_eq_inter_pair]
case h V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z✝ z : V ⊢ (∃ z_1, z ∈ z_1 ∧ z_1 ∈ ⋃ pair {x} (pair x y) ∧ (⋃ pair {x} (pair x y) ≠ ⋂ pair {x} (pair x y) → ¬z_1 ∈ ⋂ pair {x} (pair x y))) ↔ z ∈ y
case h V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z✝ z : V ⊢ (∃ z_1, z ∈ z_1 ∧ z_1 ∈ {x} ∪ pair x y ∧ (¬x = y → ¬z_1 ∈ {x} ∩ pair x y)) ↔ z ∈ y
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z✝ z : V ⊢ (∃ z_1, z ∈ z_1 ∧ z_1 ∈ ⋃ pair {x} (pair x y) ∧ (⋃ pair {x} (pair x y) ≠ ⋂ pair {x} (pair x y) → ¬z_1 ∈ ⋂ pair {x} (pair x y))) ↔ z ∈ y TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/OPair.lean
SetTheory.π₂_opair
[42, 1]
[53, 10]
constructor
case h V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z✝ z : V ⊢ (∃ z_1, z ∈ z_1 ∧ z_1 ∈ {x} ∪ pair x y ∧ (¬x = y → ¬z_1 ∈ {x} ∩ pair x y)) ↔ z ∈ y
case h.mp V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z✝ z : V ⊢ (∃ z_1, z ∈ z_1 ∧ z_1 ∈ {x} ∪ pair x y ∧ (¬x = y → ¬z_1 ∈ {x} ∩ pair x y)) → z ∈ y case h.mpr V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z✝ z : V ⊢ z ∈ y → ∃ z_1, z ∈ z_1 ∧ z_1 ∈ {x} ∪ pair x y ∧ (¬x = y → ¬z_1 ∈ {x} ∩ pair x y)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z✝ z : V ⊢ (∃ z_1, z ∈ z_1 ∧ z_1 ∈ {x} ∪ pair x y ∧ (¬x = y → ¬z_1 ∈ {x} ∩ pair x y)) ↔ z ∈ y TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/OPair.lean
SetTheory.π₂_opair
[42, 1]
[53, 10]
rintro ⟨s, hzs, hsx, hs⟩
case h.mp V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z✝ z : V ⊢ (∃ z_1, z ∈ z_1 ∧ z_1 ∈ {x} ∪ pair x y ∧ (¬x = y → ¬z_1 ∈ {x} ∩ pair x y)) → z ∈ y
case h.mp.intro.intro.intro V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z✝ z s : V hzs : z ∈ s hsx : s ∈ {x} ∪ pair x y hs : ¬x = y → ¬s ∈ {x} ∩ pair x y ⊢ z ∈ y
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h.mp V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z✝ z : V ⊢ (∃ z_1, z ∈ z_1 ∧ z_1 ∈ {x} ∪ pair x y ∧ (¬x = y → ¬z_1 ∈ {x} ∩ pair x y)) → z ∈ y TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/OPair.lean
SetTheory.π₂_opair
[42, 1]
[53, 10]
by_cases h : s = y
case h.mp.intro.intro.intro V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z✝ z s : V hzs : z ∈ s hsx : s ∈ {x} ∪ pair x y hs : ¬x = y → ¬s ∈ {x} ∩ pair x y ⊢ z ∈ y
case pos V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z✝ z s : V hzs : z ∈ s hsx : s ∈ {x} ∪ pair x y hs : ¬x = y → ¬s ∈ {x} ∩ pair x y h : s = y ⊢ z ∈ y case neg V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z✝ z s : V hzs : z ∈ s hsx : s ∈ {x} ∪ pair x y hs : ¬x = y → ¬s ∈ {x} ∩ pair x y h : ¬s = y ⊢ z ∈ y
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h.mp.intro.intro.intro V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z✝ z s : V hzs : z ∈ s hsx : s ∈ {x} ∪ pair x y hs : ¬x = y → ¬s ∈ {x} ∩ pair x y ⊢ z ∈ y TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/OPair.lean
SetTheory.π₂_opair
[42, 1]
[53, 10]
subst h
case pos V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z✝ z s : V hzs : z ∈ s hsx : s ∈ {x} ∪ pair x y hs : ¬x = y → ¬s ∈ {x} ∩ pair x y h : s = y ⊢ z ∈ y
case pos V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x z✝ z s : V hzs : z ∈ s hsx : s ∈ {x} ∪ pair x s hs : ¬x = s → ¬s ∈ {x} ∩ pair x s ⊢ z ∈ s
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case pos V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z✝ z s : V hzs : z ∈ s hsx : s ∈ {x} ∪ pair x y hs : ¬x = y → ¬s ∈ {x} ∩ pair x y h : s = y ⊢ z ∈ y TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/OPair.lean
SetTheory.π₂_opair
[42, 1]
[53, 10]
exact hzs
case pos V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x z✝ z s : V hzs : z ∈ s hsx : s ∈ {x} ∪ pair x s hs : ¬x = s → ¬s ∈ {x} ∩ pair x s ⊢ z ∈ s
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case pos V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x z✝ z s : V hzs : z ∈ s hsx : s ∈ {x} ∪ pair x s hs : ¬x = s → ¬s ∈ {x} ∩ pair x s ⊢ z ∈ s TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/OPair.lean
SetTheory.π₂_opair
[42, 1]
[53, 10]
aesop
case neg V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z✝ z s : V hzs : z ∈ s hsx : s ∈ {x} ∪ pair x y hs : ¬x = y → ¬s ∈ {x} ∩ pair x y h : ¬s = y ⊢ z ∈ y
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case neg V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z✝ z s : V hzs : z ∈ s hsx : s ∈ {x} ∪ pair x y hs : ¬x = y → ¬s ∈ {x} ∩ pair x y h : ¬s = y ⊢ z ∈ y TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/OPair.lean
SetTheory.π₂_opair
[42, 1]
[53, 10]
aesop
case h.mpr V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z✝ z : V ⊢ z ∈ y → ∃ z_1, z ∈ z_1 ∧ z_1 ∈ {x} ∪ pair x y ∧ (¬x = y → ¬z_1 ∈ {x} ∩ pair x y)
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h.mpr V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z✝ z : V ⊢ z ∈ y → ∃ z_1, z ∈ z_1 ∧ z_1 ∈ {x} ∪ pair x y ∧ (¬x = y → ¬z_1 ∈ {x} ∩ pair x y) TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/OPair.lean
SetTheory.opair_injective
[56, 1]
[65, 8]
constructor
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y✝ z✝ x y z w : V ⊢ opair x y = opair z w ↔ x = z ∧ y = w
case mp V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y✝ z✝ x y z w : V ⊢ opair x y = opair z w → x = z ∧ y = w case mpr V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y✝ z✝ x y z w : V ⊢ x = z ∧ y = w → opair x y = opair z w
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y✝ z✝ x y z w : V ⊢ opair x y = opair z w ↔ x = z ∧ y = w TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/OPair.lean
SetTheory.opair_injective
[56, 1]
[65, 8]
intro h
case mp V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y✝ z✝ x y z w : V ⊢ opair x y = opair z w → x = z ∧ y = w
case mp V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y✝ z✝ x y z w : V h : opair x y = opair z w ⊢ x = z ∧ y = w
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case mp V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y✝ z✝ x y z w : V ⊢ opair x y = opair z w → x = z ∧ y = w TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/OPair.lean
SetTheory.opair_injective
[56, 1]
[65, 8]
have h₁ := congrArg π₁ h
case mp V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y✝ z✝ x y z w : V h : opair x y = opair z w ⊢ x = z ∧ y = w
case mp V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y✝ z✝ x y z w : V h : opair x y = opair z w h₁ : π₁ (opair x y) = π₁ (opair z w) ⊢ x = z ∧ y = w
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case mp V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y✝ z✝ x y z w : V h : opair x y = opair z w ⊢ x = z ∧ y = w TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/OPair.lean
SetTheory.opair_injective
[56, 1]
[65, 8]
have h₂ := congrArg π₂ h
case mp V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y✝ z✝ x y z w : V h : opair x y = opair z w h₁ : π₁ (opair x y) = π₁ (opair z w) ⊢ x = z ∧ y = w
case mp V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y✝ z✝ x y z w : V h : opair x y = opair z w h₁ : π₁ (opair x y) = π₁ (opair z w) h₂ : π₂ (opair x y) = π₂ (opair z w) ⊢ x = z ∧ y = w
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case mp V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y✝ z✝ x y z w : V h : opair x y = opair z w h₁ : π₁ (opair x y) = π₁ (opair z w) ⊢ x = z ∧ y = w TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/OPair.lean
SetTheory.opair_injective
[56, 1]
[65, 8]
simp at h₁ h₂
case mp V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y✝ z✝ x y z w : V h : opair x y = opair z w h₁ : π₁ (opair x y) = π₁ (opair z w) h₂ : π₂ (opair x y) = π₂ (opair z w) ⊢ x = z ∧ y = w
case mp V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y✝ z✝ x y z w : V h : opair x y = opair z w h₁ : x = z h₂ : y = w ⊢ x = z ∧ y = w
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case mp V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y✝ z✝ x y z w : V h : opair x y = opair z w h₁ : π₁ (opair x y) = π₁ (opair z w) h₂ : π₂ (opair x y) = π₂ (opair z w) ⊢ x = z ∧ y = w TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/OPair.lean
SetTheory.opair_injective
[56, 1]
[65, 8]
exact ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
case mp V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y✝ z✝ x y z w : V h : opair x y = opair z w h₁ : x = z h₂ : y = w ⊢ x = z ∧ y = w
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case mp V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y✝ z✝ x y z w : V h : opair x y = opair z w h₁ : x = z h₂ : y = w ⊢ x = z ∧ y = w TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/OPair.lean
SetTheory.opair_injective
[56, 1]
[65, 8]
rintro ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
case mpr V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y✝ z✝ x y z w : V ⊢ x = z ∧ y = w → opair x y = opair z w
case mpr.intro V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y✝ z x y : V ⊢ opair x y = opair x y
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case mpr V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y✝ z✝ x y z w : V ⊢ x = z ∧ y = w → opair x y = opair z w TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/OPair.lean
SetTheory.opair_injective
[56, 1]
[65, 8]
rfl
case mpr.intro V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y✝ z x y : V ⊢ opair x y = opair x y
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case mpr.intro V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y✝ z x y : V ⊢ opair x y = opair x y TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/OPair.lean
SetTheory.eq_pair_iff
[76, 1]
[78, 7]
rw [ext_iff]
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z : V ⊢ x = pair y z ↔ ∀ (t : V), t ∈ x ↔ t = y ∨ t = z
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z : V ⊢ (∀ (z_1 : V), z_1 ∈ x ↔ z_1 ∈ pair y z) ↔ ∀ (t : V), t ∈ x ↔ t = y ∨ t = z
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z : V ⊢ x = pair y z ↔ ∀ (t : V), t ∈ x ↔ t = y ∨ t = z TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/OPair.lean
SetTheory.eq_pair_iff
[76, 1]
[78, 7]
simp
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z : V ⊢ (∀ (z_1 : V), z_1 ∈ x ↔ z_1 ∈ pair y z) ↔ ∀ (t : V), t ∈ x ↔ t = y ∨ t = z
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z : V ⊢ (∀ (z_1 : V), z_1 ∈ x ↔ z_1 ∈ pair y z) ↔ ∀ (t : V), t ∈ x ↔ t = y ∨ t = z TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/OPair.lean
SetTheory.interpret_eqPair
[81, 1]
[86, 7]
unfold BoundedFormula.eqPair
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y✝ z✝ : V α : Type n : Nat v : α → V l : Fin n → V x y z : α ⊕ Fin n ⊢ Interpret V (BoundedFormula.eqPair x y z) v l ↔ interpretTerm V v l x = pair (interpretTerm V v l y) (interpretTerm V v l z)
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y✝ z✝ : V α : Type n : Nat v : α → V l : Fin n → V x y z : α ⊕ Fin n ⊢ Interpret V (BoundedFormula.all (BoundedFormula.iff (BoundedFormula.mem (Sum.inr (Fin.last n)) (termSucc x)) (BoundedFormula.or (BoundedFormula.eq (Sum.inr (Fin.last n)) (termSucc y)) (BoundedFormula.eq (Sum.inr (Fin.last n)) (termSucc z))))) v l ↔ interpretTerm V v l x = pair (interpretTerm V v l y) (interpretTerm V v l z)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y✝ z✝ : V α : Type n : Nat v : α → V l : Fin n → V x y z : α ⊕ Fin n ⊢ Interpret V (BoundedFormula.eqPair x y z) v l ↔ interpretTerm V v l x = pair (interpretTerm V v l y) (interpretTerm V v l z) TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/OPair.lean
SetTheory.interpret_eqPair
[81, 1]
[86, 7]
rw [eq_pair_iff]
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y✝ z✝ : V α : Type n : Nat v : α → V l : Fin n → V x y z : α ⊕ Fin n ⊢ Interpret V (BoundedFormula.all (BoundedFormula.iff (BoundedFormula.mem (Sum.inr (Fin.last n)) (termSucc x)) (BoundedFormula.or (BoundedFormula.eq (Sum.inr (Fin.last n)) (termSucc y)) (BoundedFormula.eq (Sum.inr (Fin.last n)) (termSucc z))))) v l ↔ interpretTerm V v l x = pair (interpretTerm V v l y) (interpretTerm V v l z)
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y✝ z✝ : V α : Type n : Nat v : α → V l : Fin n → V x y z : α ⊕ Fin n ⊢ Interpret V (BoundedFormula.all (BoundedFormula.iff (BoundedFormula.mem (Sum.inr (Fin.last n)) (termSucc x)) (BoundedFormula.or (BoundedFormula.eq (Sum.inr (Fin.last n)) (termSucc y)) (BoundedFormula.eq (Sum.inr (Fin.last n)) (termSucc z))))) v l ↔ ∀ (t : V), t ∈ interpretTerm V v l x ↔ t = interpretTerm V v l y ∨ t = interpretTerm V v l z
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y✝ z✝ : V α : Type n : Nat v : α → V l : Fin n → V x y z : α ⊕ Fin n ⊢ Interpret V (BoundedFormula.all (BoundedFormula.iff (BoundedFormula.mem (Sum.inr (Fin.last n)) (termSucc x)) (BoundedFormula.or (BoundedFormula.eq (Sum.inr (Fin.last n)) (termSucc y)) (BoundedFormula.eq (Sum.inr (Fin.last n)) (termSucc z))))) v l ↔ interpretTerm V v l x = pair (interpretTerm V v l y) (interpretTerm V v l z) TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/OPair.lean
SetTheory.interpret_eqPair
[81, 1]
[86, 7]
simp
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y✝ z✝ : V α : Type n : Nat v : α → V l : Fin n → V x y z : α ⊕ Fin n ⊢ Interpret V (BoundedFormula.all (BoundedFormula.iff (BoundedFormula.mem (Sum.inr (Fin.last n)) (termSucc x)) (BoundedFormula.or (BoundedFormula.eq (Sum.inr (Fin.last n)) (termSucc y)) (BoundedFormula.eq (Sum.inr (Fin.last n)) (termSucc z))))) v l ↔ ∀ (t : V), t ∈ interpretTerm V v l x ↔ t = interpretTerm V v l y ∨ t = interpretTerm V v l z
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y✝ z✝ : V α : Type n : Nat v : α → V l : Fin n → V x y z : α ⊕ Fin n ⊢ Interpret V (BoundedFormula.all (BoundedFormula.iff (BoundedFormula.mem (Sum.inr (Fin.last n)) (termSucc x)) (BoundedFormula.or (BoundedFormula.eq (Sum.inr (Fin.last n)) (termSucc y)) (BoundedFormula.eq (Sum.inr (Fin.last n)) (termSucc z))))) v l ↔ ∀ (t : V), t ∈ interpretTerm V v l x ↔ t = interpretTerm V v l y ∨ t = interpretTerm V v l z TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/OPair.lean
SetTheory.interpret_eqSingleton
[93, 1]
[97, 7]
unfold BoundedFormula.eqSingleton
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y✝ z : V α : Type n : Nat v : α → V l : Fin n → V x y : α ⊕ Fin n ⊢ Interpret V (BoundedFormula.eqSingleton x y) v l ↔ interpretTerm V v l x = {interpretTerm V v l y}
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y✝ z : V α : Type n : Nat v : α → V l : Fin n → V x y : α ⊕ Fin n ⊢ Interpret V (BoundedFormula.eqPair x y y) v l ↔ interpretTerm V v l x = {interpretTerm V v l y}
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y✝ z : V α : Type n : Nat v : α → V l : Fin n → V x y : α ⊕ Fin n ⊢ Interpret V (BoundedFormula.eqSingleton x y) v l ↔ interpretTerm V v l x = {interpretTerm V v l y} TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/OPair.lean
SetTheory.interpret_eqSingleton
[93, 1]
[97, 7]
simp
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y✝ z : V α : Type n : Nat v : α → V l : Fin n → V x y : α ⊕ Fin n ⊢ Interpret V (BoundedFormula.eqPair x y y) v l ↔ interpretTerm V v l x = {interpretTerm V v l y}
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y✝ z : V α : Type n : Nat v : α → V l : Fin n → V x y : α ⊕ Fin n ⊢ Interpret V (BoundedFormula.eqPair x y y) v l ↔ interpretTerm V v l x = {interpretTerm V v l y} TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/OPair.lean
SetTheory.interpret_isPair
[108, 1]
[111, 7]
unfold BoundedFormula.isPair IsPair
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y z : V α : Type n : Nat v : α → V l : Fin n → V x : α ⊕ Fin n ⊢ Interpret V (BoundedFormula.isPair x) v l ↔ IsPair (interpretTerm V v l x)
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y z : V α : Type n : Nat v : α → V l : Fin n → V x : α ⊕ Fin n ⊢ Interpret V (BoundedFormula.exists (BoundedFormula.exists (BoundedFormula.eqPair (termSucc (termSucc x)) (Sum.inr { val := n, isLt := (_ : n < n + (1 + 1)) }) (Sum.inr (Fin.last (n + 1)))))) v l ↔ ∃ y z, interpretTerm V v l x = pair y z
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y z : V α : Type n : Nat v : α → V l : Fin n → V x : α ⊕ Fin n ⊢ Interpret V (BoundedFormula.isPair x) v l ↔ IsPair (interpretTerm V v l x) TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/OPair.lean
SetTheory.interpret_isPair
[108, 1]
[111, 7]
simp
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y z : V α : Type n : Nat v : α → V l : Fin n → V x : α ⊕ Fin n ⊢ Interpret V (BoundedFormula.exists (BoundedFormula.exists (BoundedFormula.eqPair (termSucc (termSucc x)) (Sum.inr { val := n, isLt := (_ : n < n + (1 + 1)) }) (Sum.inr (Fin.last (n + 1)))))) v l ↔ ∃ y z, interpretTerm V v l x = pair y z
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y z : V α : Type n : Nat v : α → V l : Fin n → V x : α ⊕ Fin n ⊢ Interpret V (BoundedFormula.exists (BoundedFormula.exists (BoundedFormula.eqPair (termSucc (termSucc x)) (Sum.inr { val := n, isLt := (_ : n < n + (1 + 1)) }) (Sum.inr (Fin.last (n + 1)))))) v l ↔ ∃ y z, interpretTerm V v l x = pair y z TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/OPair.lean
SetTheory.interpret_eqOPair
[125, 1]
[129, 8]
unfold BoundedFormula.eqOPair opair
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y✝ z✝ : V α : Type n : Nat v : α → V l : Fin n → V x y z : α ⊕ Fin n ⊢ Interpret V (BoundedFormula.eqOPair x y z) v l ↔ interpretTerm V v l x = opair (interpretTerm V v l y) (interpretTerm V v l z)
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y✝ z✝ : V α : Type n : Nat v : α → V l : Fin n → V x y z : α ⊕ Fin n ⊢ Interpret V (BoundedFormula.exists (BoundedFormula.exists (BoundedFormula.and (BoundedFormula.and (BoundedFormula.eqSingleton (Sum.inr { val := n, isLt := (_ : n < n + (1 + 1)) }) (termSucc (termSucc y))) (BoundedFormula.eqPair (Sum.inr { val := n + 1, isLt := (_ : n + 1 < n + 1 + (0 + 1)) }) (termSucc (termSucc y)) (termSucc (termSucc z)))) (BoundedFormula.eqPair (termSucc (termSucc x)) (Sum.inr { val := n, isLt := (_ : n < n + (1 + 1)) }) (Sum.inr { val := n + 1, isLt := (_ : n + 1 < n + 1 + (0 + 1)) }))))) v l ↔ interpretTerm V v l x = pair {interpretTerm V v l y} (pair (interpretTerm V v l y) (interpretTerm V v l z))
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y✝ z✝ : V α : Type n : Nat v : α → V l : Fin n → V x y z : α ⊕ Fin n ⊢ Interpret V (BoundedFormula.eqOPair x y z) v l ↔ interpretTerm V v l x = opair (interpretTerm V v l y) (interpretTerm V v l z) TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/OPair.lean
SetTheory.interpret_eqOPair
[125, 1]
[129, 8]
aesop
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y✝ z✝ : V α : Type n : Nat v : α → V l : Fin n → V x y z : α ⊕ Fin n ⊢ Interpret V (BoundedFormula.exists (BoundedFormula.exists (BoundedFormula.and (BoundedFormula.and (BoundedFormula.eqSingleton (Sum.inr { val := n, isLt := (_ : n < n + (1 + 1)) }) (termSucc (termSucc y))) (BoundedFormula.eqPair (Sum.inr { val := n + 1, isLt := (_ : n + 1 < n + 1 + (0 + 1)) }) (termSucc (termSucc y)) (termSucc (termSucc z)))) (BoundedFormula.eqPair (termSucc (termSucc x)) (Sum.inr { val := n, isLt := (_ : n < n + (1 + 1)) }) (Sum.inr { val := n + 1, isLt := (_ : n + 1 < n + 1 + (0 + 1)) }))))) v l ↔ interpretTerm V v l x = pair {interpretTerm V v l y} (pair (interpretTerm V v l y) (interpretTerm V v l z))
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y✝ z✝ : V α : Type n : Nat v : α → V l : Fin n → V x y z : α ⊕ Fin n ⊢ Interpret V (BoundedFormula.exists (BoundedFormula.exists (BoundedFormula.and (BoundedFormula.and (BoundedFormula.eqSingleton (Sum.inr { val := n, isLt := (_ : n < n + (1 + 1)) }) (termSucc (termSucc y))) (BoundedFormula.eqPair (Sum.inr { val := n + 1, isLt := (_ : n + 1 < n + 1 + (0 + 1)) }) (termSucc (termSucc y)) (termSucc (termSucc z)))) (BoundedFormula.eqPair (termSucc (termSucc x)) (Sum.inr { val := n, isLt := (_ : n < n + (1 + 1)) }) (Sum.inr { val := n + 1, isLt := (_ : n + 1 < n + 1 + (0 + 1)) }))))) v l ↔ interpretTerm V v l x = pair {interpretTerm V v l y} (pair (interpretTerm V v l y) (interpretTerm V v l z)) TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/OPair.lean
SetTheory.interpret_isOPair
[140, 1]
[143, 8]
unfold BoundedFormula.isOPair IsOPair opair
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y z : V α : Type n : Nat v : α → V l : Fin n → V x : α ⊕ Fin n ⊢ Interpret V (BoundedFormula.isOPair x) v l ↔ IsOPair (interpretTerm V v l x)
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y z : V α : Type n : Nat v : α → V l : Fin n → V x : α ⊕ Fin n ⊢ Interpret V (BoundedFormula.exists (BoundedFormula.exists (BoundedFormula.eqOPair (termSucc (termSucc x)) (Sum.inr { val := n, isLt := (_ : n < n + (1 + 1)) }) (Sum.inr { val := n + 1, isLt := (_ : n + 1 < n + 1 + (0 + 1)) })))) v l ↔ ∃ y z, interpretTerm V v l x = pair {y} (pair y z)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y z : V α : Type n : Nat v : α → V l : Fin n → V x : α ⊕ Fin n ⊢ Interpret V (BoundedFormula.isOPair x) v l ↔ IsOPair (interpretTerm V v l x) TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/OPair.lean
SetTheory.interpret_isOPair
[140, 1]
[143, 8]
aesop
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y z : V α : Type n : Nat v : α → V l : Fin n → V x : α ⊕ Fin n ⊢ Interpret V (BoundedFormula.exists (BoundedFormula.exists (BoundedFormula.eqOPair (termSucc (termSucc x)) (Sum.inr { val := n, isLt := (_ : n < n + (1 + 1)) }) (Sum.inr { val := n + 1, isLt := (_ : n + 1 < n + 1 + (0 + 1)) })))) v l ↔ ∃ y z, interpretTerm V v l x = pair {y} (pair y z)
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y z : V α : Type n : Nat v : α → V l : Fin n → V x : α ⊕ Fin n ⊢ Interpret V (BoundedFormula.exists (BoundedFormula.exists (BoundedFormula.eqOPair (termSucc (termSucc x)) (Sum.inr { val := n, isLt := (_ : n < n + (1 + 1)) }) (Sum.inr { val := n + 1, isLt := (_ : n + 1 < n + 1 + (0 + 1)) })))) v l ↔ ∃ y z, interpretTerm V v l x = pair {y} (pair y z) TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/OPair.lean
SetTheory.interpret_memProd'
[153, 1]
[157, 8]
unfold BoundedFormula.memProd
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y✝ z✝ : V α : Type n : Nat v : α → V l : Fin n → V x y z : α ⊕ Fin n ⊢ Interpret V (BoundedFormula.memProd x y z) v l ↔ ∃ a, a ∈ interpretTerm V v l y ∧ ∃ b, b ∈ interpretTerm V v l z ∧ interpretTerm V v l x = opair a b
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y✝ z✝ : V α : Type n : Nat v : α → V l : Fin n → V x y z : α ⊕ Fin n ⊢ Interpret V (BoundedFormula.exists (BoundedFormula.exists (BoundedFormula.and (BoundedFormula.and (BoundedFormula.mem (Sum.inr { val := n, isLt := (_ : n < n + (1 + 1)) }) (termSucc (termSucc y))) (BoundedFormula.mem (Sum.inr { val := n + 1, isLt := (_ : n + 1 < n + 1 + (0 + 1)) }) (termSucc (termSucc z)))) (BoundedFormula.eqOPair (termSucc (termSucc x)) (Sum.inr { val := n, isLt := (_ : n < n + (1 + 1)) }) (Sum.inr { val := n + 1, isLt := (_ : n + 1 < n + 1 + (0 + 1)) }))))) v l ↔ ∃ a, a ∈ interpretTerm V v l y ∧ ∃ b, b ∈ interpretTerm V v l z ∧ interpretTerm V v l x = opair a b
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y✝ z✝ : V α : Type n : Nat v : α → V l : Fin n → V x y z : α ⊕ Fin n ⊢ Interpret V (BoundedFormula.memProd x y z) v l ↔ ∃ a, a ∈ interpretTerm V v l y ∧ ∃ b, b ∈ interpretTerm V v l z ∧ interpretTerm V v l x = opair a b TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/OPair.lean
SetTheory.interpret_memProd'
[153, 1]
[157, 8]
aesop
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y✝ z✝ : V α : Type n : Nat v : α → V l : Fin n → V x y z : α ⊕ Fin n ⊢ Interpret V (BoundedFormula.exists (BoundedFormula.exists (BoundedFormula.and (BoundedFormula.and (BoundedFormula.mem (Sum.inr { val := n, isLt := (_ : n < n + (1 + 1)) }) (termSucc (termSucc y))) (BoundedFormula.mem (Sum.inr { val := n + 1, isLt := (_ : n + 1 < n + 1 + (0 + 1)) }) (termSucc (termSucc z)))) (BoundedFormula.eqOPair (termSucc (termSucc x)) (Sum.inr { val := n, isLt := (_ : n < n + (1 + 1)) }) (Sum.inr { val := n + 1, isLt := (_ : n + 1 < n + 1 + (0 + 1)) }))))) v l ↔ ∃ a, a ∈ interpretTerm V v l y ∧ ∃ b, b ∈ interpretTerm V v l z ∧ interpretTerm V v l x = opair a b
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y✝ z✝ : V α : Type n : Nat v : α → V l : Fin n → V x y z : α ⊕ Fin n ⊢ Interpret V (BoundedFormula.exists (BoundedFormula.exists (BoundedFormula.and (BoundedFormula.and (BoundedFormula.mem (Sum.inr { val := n, isLt := (_ : n < n + (1 + 1)) }) (termSucc (termSucc y))) (BoundedFormula.mem (Sum.inr { val := n + 1, isLt := (_ : n + 1 < n + 1 + (0 + 1)) }) (termSucc (termSucc z)))) (BoundedFormula.eqOPair (termSucc (termSucc x)) (Sum.inr { val := n, isLt := (_ : n < n + (1 + 1)) }) (Sum.inr { val := n + 1, isLt := (_ : n + 1 < n + 1 + (0 + 1)) }))))) v l ↔ ∃ a, a ∈ interpretTerm V v l y ∧ ∃ b, b ∈ interpretTerm V v l z ∧ interpretTerm V v l x = opair a b TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/OPair.lean
SetTheory.mem_prod_iff
[165, 1]
[175, 10]
unfold prod
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z : V ⊢ z ∈ prod x y ↔ ∃ a, a ∈ x ∧ ∃ b, b ∈ y ∧ z = opair a b
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z : V ⊢ z ∈ sep (BoundedFormula.memProd (Sum.inr 0) (Sum.inl true) (Sum.inl false)) (fun i => if i = true then x else y) (power (power (x ∪ y))) ↔ ∃ a, a ∈ x ∧ ∃ b, b ∈ y ∧ z = opair a b
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z : V ⊢ z ∈ prod x y ↔ ∃ a, a ∈ x ∧ ∃ b, b ∈ y ∧ z = opair a b TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/OPair.lean
SetTheory.mem_prod_iff
[165, 1]
[175, 10]
simp only [mem_sep_iff, mem_power_iff, interpret_memProd', interpret_inl, ite_true, ite_false, interpret_inr, and_iff_right_iff_imp, forall_exists_index, and_imp]
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z : V ⊢ z ∈ sep (BoundedFormula.memProd (Sum.inr 0) (Sum.inl true) (Sum.inl false)) (fun i => if i = true then x else y) (power (power (x ∪ y))) ↔ ∃ a, a ∈ x ∧ ∃ b, b ∈ y ∧ z = opair a b
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z : V ⊢ ∀ (x_1 : V), x_1 ∈ x → ∀ (x_2 : V), x_2 ∈ y → z = opair x_1 x_2 → z ⊆ power (x ∪ y)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z : V ⊢ z ∈ sep (BoundedFormula.memProd (Sum.inr 0) (Sum.inl true) (Sum.inl false)) (fun i => if i = true then x else y) (power (power (x ∪ y))) ↔ ∃ a, a ∈ x ∧ ∃ b, b ∈ y ∧ z = opair a b TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/OPair.lean
SetTheory.mem_prod_iff
[165, 1]
[175, 10]
rintro a ha b hb rfl
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z : V ⊢ ∀ (x_1 : V), x_1 ∈ x → ∀ (x_2 : V), x_2 ∈ y → z = opair x_1 x_2 → z ⊆ power (x ∪ y)
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y a : V ha : a ∈ x b : V hb : b ∈ y ⊢ opair a b ⊆ power (x ∪ y)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z : V ⊢ ∀ (x_1 : V), x_1 ∈ x → ∀ (x_2 : V), x_2 ∈ y → z = opair x_1 x_2 → z ⊆ power (x ∪ y) TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/OPair.lean
SetTheory.mem_prod_iff
[165, 1]
[175, 10]
intro z hz
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y a : V ha : a ∈ x b : V hb : b ∈ y ⊢ opair a b ⊆ power (x ∪ y)
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y a : V ha : a ∈ x b : V hb : b ∈ y z : V hz : z ∈ opair a b ⊢ z ∈ power (x ∪ y)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y a : V ha : a ∈ x b : V hb : b ∈ y ⊢ opair a b ⊆ power (x ∪ y) TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/OPair.lean
SetTheory.mem_prod_iff
[165, 1]
[175, 10]
rw [opair, mem_pair_iff] at hz
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y a : V ha : a ∈ x b : V hb : b ∈ y z : V hz : z ∈ opair a b ⊢ z ∈ power (x ∪ y)
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y a : V ha : a ∈ x b : V hb : b ∈ y z : V hz : z = {a} ∨ z = pair a b ⊢ z ∈ power (x ∪ y)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y a : V ha : a ∈ x b : V hb : b ∈ y z : V hz : z ∈ opair a b ⊢ z ∈ power (x ∪ y) TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/OPair.lean
SetTheory.mem_prod_iff
[165, 1]
[175, 10]
rw [mem_power_iff]
case inr V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y a : V ha : a ∈ x b : V hb : b ∈ y ⊢ pair a b ∈ power (x ∪ y)
case inr V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y a : V ha : a ∈ x b : V hb : b ∈ y ⊢ pair a b ⊆ x ∪ y
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case inr V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y a : V ha : a ∈ x b : V hb : b ∈ y ⊢ pair a b ∈ power (x ∪ y) TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/OPair.lean
SetTheory.mem_prod_iff
[165, 1]
[175, 10]
intro t ht
case inr V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y a : V ha : a ∈ x b : V hb : b ∈ y ⊢ pair a b ⊆ x ∪ y
case inr V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y a : V ha : a ∈ x b : V hb : b ∈ y t : V ht : t ∈ pair a b ⊢ t ∈ x ∪ y
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case inr V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y a : V ha : a ∈ x b : V hb : b ∈ y ⊢ pair a b ⊆ x ∪ y TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/OPair.lean
SetTheory.mem_prod_iff
[165, 1]
[175, 10]
aesop
case inr V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y a : V ha : a ∈ x b : V hb : b ∈ y t : V ht : t ∈ pair a b ⊢ t ∈ x ∪ y
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case inr V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y a : V ha : a ∈ x b : V hb : b ∈ y t : V ht : t ∈ pair a b ⊢ t ∈ x ∪ y TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/OPair.lean
SetTheory.opair_mem_prod_iff
[178, 1]
[180, 8]
rw [mem_prod_iff]
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z a b : V ⊢ opair a b ∈ prod x y ↔ a ∈ x ∧ b ∈ y
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z a b : V ⊢ (∃ a_1, a_1 ∈ x ∧ ∃ b_1, b_1 ∈ y ∧ opair a b = opair a_1 b_1) ↔ a ∈ x ∧ b ∈ y
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z a b : V ⊢ opair a b ∈ prod x y ↔ a ∈ x ∧ b ∈ y TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/OPair.lean
SetTheory.opair_mem_prod_iff
[178, 1]
[180, 8]
aesop
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z a b : V ⊢ (∃ a_1, a_1 ∈ x ∧ ∃ b_1, b_1 ∈ y ∧ opair a b = opair a_1 b_1) ↔ a ∈ x ∧ b ∈ y
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z a b : V ⊢ (∃ a_1, a_1 ∈ x ∧ ∃ b_1, b_1 ∈ y ∧ opair a b = opair a_1 b_1) ↔ a ∈ x ∧ b ∈ y TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/OPair.lean
SetTheory.interpret_isOPairIn
[183, 1]
[186, 40]
rw [mem_prod_iff, interpret_memProd']
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y✝ z✝ : V α : Type n : Nat v : α → V l : Fin n → V x y z : α ⊕ Fin n ⊢ Interpret V (BoundedFormula.memProd x y z) v l ↔ interpretTerm V v l x ∈ prod (interpretTerm V v l y) (interpretTerm V v l z)
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y✝ z✝ : V α : Type n : Nat v : α → V l : Fin n → V x y z : α ⊕ Fin n ⊢ Interpret V (BoundedFormula.memProd x y z) v l ↔ interpretTerm V v l x ∈ prod (interpretTerm V v l y) (interpretTerm V v l z) TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Formula.lean
not_not
[104, 1]
[105, 23]
by_cases p <;> aesop
V : Type ?u.5243 inst✝ : SetTheory V p : Prop ⊢ ¬¬p ↔ p
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type ?u.5243 inst✝ : SetTheory V p : Prop ⊢ ¬¬p ↔ p TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Formula.lean
not_forall
[108, 1]
[112, 10]
constructor
V : Type ?u.5314 inst✝ : SetTheory V α : Sort u_1 p : α → Prop ⊢ (¬∀ (x : α), p x) ↔ ∃ x, ¬p x
case mp V : Type ?u.5314 inst✝ : SetTheory V α : Sort u_1 p : α → Prop ⊢ (¬∀ (x : α), p x) → ∃ x, ¬p x case mpr V : Type ?u.5314 inst✝ : SetTheory V α : Sort u_1 p : α → Prop ⊢ (∃ x, ¬p x) → ¬∀ (x : α), p x
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type ?u.5314 inst✝ : SetTheory V α : Sort u_1 p : α → Prop ⊢ (¬∀ (x : α), p x) ↔ ∃ x, ¬p x TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Formula.lean
not_forall
[108, 1]
[112, 10]
by_contra
case mp V : Type ?u.5314 inst✝ : SetTheory V α : Sort u_1 p : α → Prop ⊢ (¬∀ (x : α), p x) → ∃ x, ¬p x
case mp V : Type ?u.5314 inst✝ : SetTheory V α : Sort u_1 p : α → Prop x✝ : ¬((¬∀ (x : α), p x) → ∃ x, ¬p x) ⊢ False
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case mp V : Type ?u.5314 inst✝ : SetTheory V α : Sort u_1 p : α → Prop ⊢ (¬∀ (x : α), p x) → ∃ x, ¬p x TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Formula.lean
not_forall
[108, 1]
[112, 10]
aesop
case mp V : Type ?u.5314 inst✝ : SetTheory V α : Sort u_1 p : α → Prop x✝ : ¬((¬∀ (x : α), p x) → ∃ x, ¬p x) ⊢ False
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case mp V : Type ?u.5314 inst✝ : SetTheory V α : Sort u_1 p : α → Prop x✝ : ¬((¬∀ (x : α), p x) → ∃ x, ¬p x) ⊢ False TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Formula.lean
not_forall
[108, 1]
[112, 10]
aesop
case mpr V : Type ?u.5314 inst✝ : SetTheory V α : Sort u_1 p : α → Prop ⊢ (∃ x, ¬p x) → ¬∀ (x : α), p x
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case mpr V : Type ?u.5314 inst✝ : SetTheory V α : Sort u_1 p : α → Prop ⊢ (∃ x, ¬p x) → ¬∀ (x : α), p x TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Formula.lean
or_iff
[114, 1]
[115, 23]
by_cases p <;> aesop
V : Type ?u.6497 inst✝ : SetTheory V p q : Prop ⊢ p ∨ q ↔ ¬p → q
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type ?u.6497 inst✝ : SetTheory V p q : Prop ⊢ p ∨ q ↔ ¬p → q TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Formula.lean
and_iff
[117, 1]
[118, 23]
by_cases p <;> aesop
V : Type ?u.6701 inst✝ : SetTheory V p q : Prop ⊢ p ∧ q ↔ ¬(p → ¬q)
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type ?u.6701 inst✝ : SetTheory V p q : Prop ⊢ p ∧ q ↔ ¬(p → ¬q) TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Formula.lean
Fin.snoc_castSucc
[132, 1]
[135, 6]
rw [Fin.snoc, dif_pos]
V : Type ?u.7418 inst✝ : SetTheory V n : Nat α : Sort u_1 l : Fin n → α x : α k : Fin n ⊢ snoc l x (castSucc k) = l k
V : Type ?u.7418 inst✝ : SetTheory V n : Nat α : Sort u_1 l : Fin n → α x : α k : Fin n ⊢ l { val := (castSucc k).val, isLt := ?hc } = l k case hc V : Type ?u.7418 inst✝ : SetTheory V n : Nat α : Sort u_1 l : Fin n → α x : α k : Fin n ⊢ (castSucc k).val < n
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type ?u.7418 inst✝ : SetTheory V n : Nat α : Sort u_1 l : Fin n → α x : α k : Fin n ⊢ snoc l x (castSucc k) = l k TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Formula.lean
Fin.snoc_castSucc
[132, 1]
[135, 6]
rfl
V : Type ?u.7418 inst✝ : SetTheory V n : Nat α : Sort u_1 l : Fin n → α x : α k : Fin n ⊢ l { val := (castSucc k).val, isLt := ?hc } = l k case hc V : Type ?u.7418 inst✝ : SetTheory V n : Nat α : Sort u_1 l : Fin n → α x : α k : Fin n ⊢ (castSucc k).val < n
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type ?u.7418 inst✝ : SetTheory V n : Nat α : Sort u_1 l : Fin n → α x : α k : Fin n ⊢ l { val := (castSucc k).val, isLt := ?hc } = l k case hc V : Type ?u.7418 inst✝ : SetTheory V n : Nat α : Sort u_1 l : Fin n → α x : α k : Fin n ⊢ (castSucc k).val < n TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Formula.lean
Nat.lt_add
[138, 1]
[145, 28]
induction m with | zero => rw [Nat.lt_succ] exact Nat.le_refl n | succ m ih => rw [← Nat.add_assoc, Nat.lt_succ] exact Nat.le_of_lt ih
V : Type ?u.7600 inst✝ : SetTheory V n m : Nat ⊢ n < n + (m + 1)
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type ?u.7600 inst✝ : SetTheory V n m : Nat ⊢ n < n + (m + 1) TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Formula.lean
Nat.lt_add
[138, 1]
[145, 28]
rw [Nat.lt_succ]
case zero V : Type ?u.7600 inst✝ : SetTheory V n : Nat ⊢ n < n + (zero + 1)
case zero V : Type ?u.7600 inst✝ : SetTheory V n : Nat ⊢ n ≤ n
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case zero V : Type ?u.7600 inst✝ : SetTheory V n : Nat ⊢ n < n + (zero + 1) TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Formula.lean
Nat.lt_add
[138, 1]
[145, 28]
exact Nat.le_refl n
case zero V : Type ?u.7600 inst✝ : SetTheory V n : Nat ⊢ n ≤ n
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case zero V : Type ?u.7600 inst✝ : SetTheory V n : Nat ⊢ n ≤ n TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Formula.lean
Nat.lt_add
[138, 1]
[145, 28]
rw [← Nat.add_assoc, Nat.lt_succ]
case succ V : Type ?u.7600 inst✝ : SetTheory V n m : Nat ih : n < n + (m + 1) ⊢ n < n + (succ m + 1)
case succ V : Type ?u.7600 inst✝ : SetTheory V n m : Nat ih : n < n + (m + 1) ⊢ n ≤ n + succ m
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case succ V : Type ?u.7600 inst✝ : SetTheory V n m : Nat ih : n < n + (m + 1) ⊢ n < n + (succ m + 1) TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Formula.lean
Nat.lt_add
[138, 1]
[145, 28]
exact Nat.le_of_lt ih
case succ V : Type ?u.7600 inst✝ : SetTheory V n m : Nat ih : n < n + (m + 1) ⊢ n ≤ n + succ m
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case succ V : Type ?u.7600 inst✝ : SetTheory V n m : Nat ih : n < n + (m + 1) ⊢ n ≤ n + succ m TACTIC: