url
stringclasses
147 values
commit
stringclasses
147 values
file_path
stringlengths
7
101
full_name
stringlengths
1
94
start
stringlengths
6
10
end
stringlengths
6
11
tactic
stringlengths
1
11.2k
state_before
stringlengths
3
2.09M
state_after
stringlengths
6
2.09M
input
stringlengths
73
2.09M
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Basic.lean
SetTheory.subset_antisymm
[92, 1]
[93, 16]
aesop
case h V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z : V h₁ : x ⊆ y h₂ : y ⊆ x z✝ : V ⊢ z✝ ∈ x ↔ z✝ ∈ y
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z : V h₁ : x ⊆ y h₂ : y ⊆ x z✝ : V ⊢ z✝ ∈ x ↔ z✝ ∈ y TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Basic.lean
SetTheory.russellSet_subset
[105, 1]
[109, 8]
unfold russellSet
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y z x : V ⊢ russellSet x ⊆ x
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y z x : V ⊢ sep (BoundedFormula.not (BoundedFormula.mem (Sum.inr 0) (Sum.inr 0))) (fun i => Empty.elim i) x ⊆ x
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y z x : V ⊢ russellSet x ⊆ x TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Basic.lean
SetTheory.russellSet_subset
[105, 1]
[109, 8]
intro y hy
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y z x : V ⊢ sep (BoundedFormula.not (BoundedFormula.mem (Sum.inr 0) (Sum.inr 0))) (fun i => Empty.elim i) x ⊆ x
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y✝ z x y : V hy : y ∈ sep (BoundedFormula.not (BoundedFormula.mem (Sum.inr 0) (Sum.inr 0))) (fun i => Empty.elim i) x ⊢ y ∈ x
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y z x : V ⊢ sep (BoundedFormula.not (BoundedFormula.mem (Sum.inr 0) (Sum.inr 0))) (fun i => Empty.elim i) x ⊆ x TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Basic.lean
SetTheory.russellSet_subset
[105, 1]
[109, 8]
aesop
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y✝ z x y : V hy : y ∈ sep (BoundedFormula.not (BoundedFormula.mem (Sum.inr 0) (Sum.inr 0))) (fun i => Empty.elim i) x ⊢ y ∈ x
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y✝ z x y : V hy : y ∈ sep (BoundedFormula.not (BoundedFormula.mem (Sum.inr 0) (Sum.inr 0))) (fun i => Empty.elim i) x ⊢ y ∈ x TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Basic.lean
SetTheory.mem_russellSet_iff
[111, 1]
[113, 7]
unfold russellSet
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z : V ⊢ y ∈ russellSet x ↔ y ∈ x ∧ ¬y ∈ y
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z : V ⊢ y ∈ sep (BoundedFormula.not (BoundedFormula.mem (Sum.inr 0) (Sum.inr 0))) (fun i => Empty.elim i) x ↔ y ∈ x ∧ ¬y ∈ y
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z : V ⊢ y ∈ russellSet x ↔ y ∈ x ∧ ¬y ∈ y TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Basic.lean
SetTheory.mem_russellSet_iff
[111, 1]
[113, 7]
simp
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z : V ⊢ y ∈ sep (BoundedFormula.not (BoundedFormula.mem (Sum.inr 0) (Sum.inr 0))) (fun i => Empty.elim i) x ↔ y ∈ x ∧ ¬y ∈ y
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z : V ⊢ y ∈ sep (BoundedFormula.not (BoundedFormula.mem (Sum.inr 0) (Sum.inr 0))) (fun i => Empty.elim i) x ↔ y ∈ x ∧ ¬y ∈ y TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Basic.lean
SetTheory.russellSet_not_mem
[115, 1]
[122, 22]
intro h
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y z x : V ⊢ ¬russellSet x ∈ x
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y z x : V h : russellSet x ∈ x ⊢ False
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y z x : V ⊢ ¬russellSet x ∈ x TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Basic.lean
SetTheory.russellSet_not_mem
[115, 1]
[122, 22]
by_cases h' : russellSet x ∈ russellSet x
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y z x : V h : russellSet x ∈ x ⊢ False
case pos V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y z x : V h : russellSet x ∈ x h' : russellSet x ∈ russellSet x ⊢ False case neg V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y z x : V h : russellSet x ∈ x h' : ¬russellSet x ∈ russellSet x ⊢ False
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y z x : V h : russellSet x ∈ x ⊢ False TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Basic.lean
SetTheory.russellSet_not_mem
[115, 1]
[122, 22]
have := mem_russellSet_iff.mp h'
case pos V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y z x : V h : russellSet x ∈ x h' : russellSet x ∈ russellSet x ⊢ False
case pos V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y z x : V h : russellSet x ∈ x h' : russellSet x ∈ russellSet x this : russellSet x ∈ x ∧ ¬russellSet x ∈ russellSet x ⊢ False
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case pos V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y z x : V h : russellSet x ∈ x h' : russellSet x ∈ russellSet x ⊢ False TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Basic.lean
SetTheory.russellSet_not_mem
[115, 1]
[122, 22]
exact this.2 h'
case pos V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y z x : V h : russellSet x ∈ x h' : russellSet x ∈ russellSet x this : russellSet x ∈ x ∧ ¬russellSet x ∈ russellSet x ⊢ False
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case pos V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y z x : V h : russellSet x ∈ x h' : russellSet x ∈ russellSet x this : russellSet x ∈ x ∧ ¬russellSet x ∈ russellSet x ⊢ False TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Basic.lean
SetTheory.russellSet_not_mem
[115, 1]
[122, 22]
have := h'
case neg V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y z x : V h : russellSet x ∈ x h' : ¬russellSet x ∈ russellSet x ⊢ False
case neg V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y z x : V h : russellSet x ∈ x h' this : ¬russellSet x ∈ russellSet x ⊢ False
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case neg V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y z x : V h : russellSet x ∈ x h' : ¬russellSet x ∈ russellSet x ⊢ False TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Basic.lean
SetTheory.russellSet_not_mem
[115, 1]
[122, 22]
rw [mem_russellSet_iff, not_and, not_not] at this
case neg V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y z x : V h : russellSet x ∈ x h' this : ¬russellSet x ∈ russellSet x ⊢ False
case neg V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y z x : V h : russellSet x ∈ x h' : ¬russellSet x ∈ russellSet x this : russellSet x ∈ x → russellSet x ∈ russellSet x ⊢ False
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case neg V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y z x : V h : russellSet x ∈ x h' this : ¬russellSet x ∈ russellSet x ⊢ False TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Basic.lean
SetTheory.russellSet_not_mem
[115, 1]
[122, 22]
exact h' (this h)
case neg V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y z x : V h : russellSet x ∈ x h' : ¬russellSet x ∈ russellSet x this : russellSet x ∈ x → russellSet x ∈ russellSet x ⊢ False
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case neg V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y z x : V h : russellSet x ∈ x h' : ¬russellSet x ∈ russellSet x this : russellSet x ∈ x → russellSet x ∈ russellSet x ⊢ False TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Basic.lean
SetTheory.univ_not_set
[125, 1]
[128, 35]
by_contra h
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y z x : V ⊢ ∃ y, ¬y ∈ x
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y z x : V h : ¬∃ y, ¬y ∈ x ⊢ False
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y z x : V ⊢ ∃ y, ¬y ∈ x TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Basic.lean
SetTheory.univ_not_set
[125, 1]
[128, 35]
simp only [not_exists, not_not] at h
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y z x : V h : ¬∃ y, ¬y ∈ x ⊢ False
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y z x : V h : ∀ (x_1 : V), x_1 ∈ x ⊢ False
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y z x : V h : ¬∃ y, ¬y ∈ x ⊢ False TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Basic.lean
SetTheory.univ_not_set
[125, 1]
[128, 35]
exact russellSet_not_mem x (h _)
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y z x : V h : ∀ (x_1 : V), x_1 ∈ x ⊢ False
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y z x : V h : ∀ (x_1 : V), x_1 ∈ x ⊢ False TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Basic.lean
SetTheory.power_not_subset
[131, 1]
[135, 28]
intro h
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y z x : V ⊢ ¬power x ⊆ x
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y z x : V h : power x ⊆ x ⊢ False
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y z x : V ⊢ ¬power x ⊆ x TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Basic.lean
SetTheory.power_not_subset
[131, 1]
[135, 28]
refine russellSet_not_mem x (h ?_)
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y z x : V h : power x ⊆ x ⊢ False
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y z x : V h : power x ⊆ x ⊢ russellSet x ∈ power x
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y z x : V h : power x ⊆ x ⊢ False TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Basic.lean
SetTheory.power_not_subset
[131, 1]
[135, 28]
rw [mem_power_iff]
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y z x : V h : power x ⊆ x ⊢ russellSet x ∈ power x
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y z x : V h : power x ⊆ x ⊢ russellSet x ⊆ x
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y z x : V h : power x ⊆ x ⊢ russellSet x ∈ power x TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Basic.lean
SetTheory.power_not_subset
[131, 1]
[135, 28]
exact russellSet_subset x
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y z x : V h : power x ⊆ x ⊢ russellSet x ⊆ x
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y z x : V h : power x ⊆ x ⊢ russellSet x ⊆ x TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Basic.lean
SetTheory.power_ne
[137, 1]
[139, 46]
intro h
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y z x : V ⊢ power x ≠ x
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y z x : V h : power x = x ⊢ False
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y z x : V ⊢ power x ≠ x TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Basic.lean
SetTheory.power_ne
[137, 1]
[139, 46]
exact (power_not_subset x) (subset_of_eq h)
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y z x : V h : power x = x ⊢ False
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x✝ y z x : V h : power x = x ⊢ False TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Basic.lean
SetTheory.inter_comm
[141, 1]
[142, 16]
ext
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z : V ⊢ x ∩ y = y ∩ x
case h V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z z✝ : V ⊢ z✝ ∈ x ∩ y ↔ z✝ ∈ y ∩ x
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z : V ⊢ x ∩ y = y ∩ x TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Basic.lean
SetTheory.inter_comm
[141, 1]
[142, 16]
aesop
case h V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z z✝ : V ⊢ z✝ ∈ x ∩ y ↔ z✝ ∈ y ∩ x
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z z✝ : V ⊢ z✝ ∈ x ∩ y ↔ z✝ ∈ y ∩ x TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Basic.lean
SetTheory.union_comm
[144, 1]
[145, 16]
ext
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z : V ⊢ x ∪ y = y ∪ x
case h V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z z✝ : V ⊢ z✝ ∈ x ∪ y ↔ z✝ ∈ y ∪ x
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z : V ⊢ x ∪ y = y ∪ x TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Basic.lean
SetTheory.union_comm
[144, 1]
[145, 16]
aesop
case h V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z z✝ : V ⊢ z✝ ∈ x ∪ y ↔ z✝ ∈ y ∪ x
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z z✝ : V ⊢ z✝ ∈ x ∪ y ↔ z✝ ∈ y ∪ x TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Basic.lean
SetTheory.inter_assoc
[147, 1]
[148, 16]
ext
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z : V ⊢ x ∩ y ∩ z = x ∩ (y ∩ z)
case h V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z z✝ : V ⊢ z✝ ∈ x ∩ y ∩ z ↔ z✝ ∈ x ∩ (y ∩ z)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z : V ⊢ x ∩ y ∩ z = x ∩ (y ∩ z) TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Basic.lean
SetTheory.inter_assoc
[147, 1]
[148, 16]
aesop
case h V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z z✝ : V ⊢ z✝ ∈ x ∩ y ∩ z ↔ z✝ ∈ x ∩ (y ∩ z)
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z z✝ : V ⊢ z✝ ∈ x ∩ y ∩ z ↔ z✝ ∈ x ∩ (y ∩ z) TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Basic.lean
SetTheory.union_assoc
[150, 1]
[151, 16]
ext
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z : V ⊢ x ∪ y ∪ z = x ∪ (y ∪ z)
case h V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z z✝ : V ⊢ z✝ ∈ x ∪ y ∪ z ↔ z✝ ∈ x ∪ (y ∪ z)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z : V ⊢ x ∪ y ∪ z = x ∪ (y ∪ z) TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Basic.lean
SetTheory.union_assoc
[150, 1]
[151, 16]
aesop
case h V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z z✝ : V ⊢ z✝ ∈ x ∪ y ∪ z ↔ z✝ ∈ x ∪ (y ∪ z)
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z z✝ : V ⊢ z✝ ∈ x ∪ y ∪ z ↔ z✝ ∈ x ∪ (y ∪ z) TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Basic.lean
SetTheory.inter_distrib_left
[153, 1]
[154, 16]
ext
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z : V ⊢ x ∩ (y ∪ z) = x ∩ y ∪ x ∩ z
case h V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z z✝ : V ⊢ z✝ ∈ x ∩ (y ∪ z) ↔ z✝ ∈ x ∩ y ∪ x ∩ z
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z : V ⊢ x ∩ (y ∪ z) = x ∩ y ∪ x ∩ z TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Basic.lean
SetTheory.inter_distrib_left
[153, 1]
[154, 16]
aesop
case h V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z z✝ : V ⊢ z✝ ∈ x ∩ (y ∪ z) ↔ z✝ ∈ x ∩ y ∪ x ∩ z
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z z✝ : V ⊢ z✝ ∈ x ∩ (y ∪ z) ↔ z✝ ∈ x ∩ y ∪ x ∩ z TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Basic.lean
SetTheory.inter_distrib_right
[156, 1]
[157, 16]
ext
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z : V ⊢ (x ∪ y) ∩ z = x ∩ z ∪ y ∩ z
case h V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z z✝ : V ⊢ z✝ ∈ (x ∪ y) ∩ z ↔ z✝ ∈ x ∩ z ∪ y ∩ z
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z : V ⊢ (x ∪ y) ∩ z = x ∩ z ∪ y ∩ z TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Basic.lean
SetTheory.inter_distrib_right
[156, 1]
[157, 16]
aesop
case h V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z z✝ : V ⊢ z✝ ∈ (x ∪ y) ∩ z ↔ z✝ ∈ x ∩ z ∪ y ∩ z
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z z✝ : V ⊢ z✝ ∈ (x ∪ y) ∩ z ↔ z✝ ∈ x ∩ z ∪ y ∩ z TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Basic.lean
SetTheory.union_distrib_left
[159, 1]
[160, 16]
ext
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z : V ⊢ x ∪ y ∩ z = (x ∪ y) ∩ (x ∪ z)
case h V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z z✝ : V ⊢ z✝ ∈ x ∪ y ∩ z ↔ z✝ ∈ (x ∪ y) ∩ (x ∪ z)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z : V ⊢ x ∪ y ∩ z = (x ∪ y) ∩ (x ∪ z) TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Basic.lean
SetTheory.union_distrib_left
[159, 1]
[160, 16]
aesop
case h V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z z✝ : V ⊢ z✝ ∈ x ∪ y ∩ z ↔ z✝ ∈ (x ∪ y) ∩ (x ∪ z)
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z z✝ : V ⊢ z✝ ∈ x ∪ y ∩ z ↔ z✝ ∈ (x ∪ y) ∩ (x ∪ z) TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Basic.lean
SetTheory.union_distrib_right
[162, 1]
[163, 16]
ext
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z : V ⊢ x ∩ y ∪ z = (x ∪ z) ∩ (y ∪ z)
case h V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z z✝ : V ⊢ z✝ ∈ x ∩ y ∪ z ↔ z✝ ∈ (x ∪ z) ∩ (y ∪ z)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z : V ⊢ x ∩ y ∪ z = (x ∪ z) ∩ (y ∪ z) TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Basic.lean
SetTheory.union_distrib_right
[162, 1]
[163, 16]
aesop
case h V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z z✝ : V ⊢ z✝ ∈ x ∩ y ∪ z ↔ z✝ ∈ (x ∪ z) ∩ (y ∪ z)
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z z✝ : V ⊢ z✝ ∈ x ∩ y ∪ z ↔ z✝ ∈ (x ∪ z) ∩ (y ∪ z) TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Basic.lean
SetTheory.inter_empty
[166, 1]
[167, 15]
ext
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z : V ⊢ x ∩ ∅ = ∅
case h V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z z✝ : V ⊢ z✝ ∈ x ∩ ∅ ↔ z✝ ∈ ∅
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z : V ⊢ x ∩ ∅ = ∅ TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Basic.lean
SetTheory.inter_empty
[166, 1]
[167, 15]
simp
case h V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z z✝ : V ⊢ z✝ ∈ x ∩ ∅ ↔ z✝ ∈ ∅
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z z✝ : V ⊢ z✝ ∈ x ∩ ∅ ↔ z✝ ∈ ∅ TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Basic.lean
SetTheory.empty_inter
[170, 1]
[171, 15]
ext
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z : V ⊢ ∅ ∩ x = ∅
case h V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z z✝ : V ⊢ z✝ ∈ ∅ ∩ x ↔ z✝ ∈ ∅
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z : V ⊢ ∅ ∩ x = ∅ TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Basic.lean
SetTheory.empty_inter
[170, 1]
[171, 15]
simp
case h V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z z✝ : V ⊢ z✝ ∈ ∅ ∩ x ↔ z✝ ∈ ∅
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z z✝ : V ⊢ z✝ ∈ ∅ ∩ x ↔ z✝ ∈ ∅ TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Basic.lean
SetTheory.union_empty
[174, 1]
[175, 15]
ext
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z : V ⊢ x ∪ ∅ = x
case h V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z z✝ : V ⊢ z✝ ∈ x ∪ ∅ ↔ z✝ ∈ x
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z : V ⊢ x ∪ ∅ = x TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Basic.lean
SetTheory.union_empty
[174, 1]
[175, 15]
simp
case h V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z z✝ : V ⊢ z✝ ∈ x ∪ ∅ ↔ z✝ ∈ x
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z z✝ : V ⊢ z✝ ∈ x ∪ ∅ ↔ z✝ ∈ x TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Basic.lean
SetTheory.empty_union
[178, 1]
[179, 15]
ext
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z : V ⊢ ∅ ∪ x = x
case h V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z z✝ : V ⊢ z✝ ∈ ∅ ∪ x ↔ z✝ ∈ x
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z : V ⊢ ∅ ∪ x = x TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Basic.lean
SetTheory.empty_union
[178, 1]
[179, 15]
simp
case h V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z z✝ : V ⊢ z✝ ∈ ∅ ∪ x ↔ z✝ ∈ x
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x y z z✝ : V ⊢ z✝ ∈ ∅ ∪ x ↔ z✝ ∈ x TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Nat.lean
SetTheory.interpret_eqUnion
[16, 1]
[21, 7]
unfold BoundedFormula.eqUnion
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V α : Type n : Nat v : α → V l : Fin n → V x y z : α ⊕ Fin n ⊢ Interpret V (BoundedFormula.eqUnion x y z) v l ↔ interpretTerm V v l x = interpretTerm V v l y ∪ interpretTerm V v l z
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V α : Type n : Nat v : α → V l : Fin n → V x y z : α ⊕ Fin n ⊢ Interpret V (BoundedFormula.all (BoundedFormula.iff (BoundedFormula.mem (Sum.inr (Fin.last n)) (termSucc x)) (BoundedFormula.or (BoundedFormula.mem (Sum.inr (Fin.last n)) (termSucc y)) (BoundedFormula.mem (Sum.inr (Fin.last n)) (termSucc z))))) v l ↔ interpretTerm V v l x = interpretTerm V v l y ∪ interpretTerm V v l z
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V α : Type n : Nat v : α → V l : Fin n → V x y z : α ⊕ Fin n ⊢ Interpret V (BoundedFormula.eqUnion x y z) v l ↔ interpretTerm V v l x = interpretTerm V v l y ∪ interpretTerm V v l z TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Nat.lean
SetTheory.interpret_eqUnion
[16, 1]
[21, 7]
rw [ext_iff]
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V α : Type n : Nat v : α → V l : Fin n → V x y z : α ⊕ Fin n ⊢ Interpret V (BoundedFormula.all (BoundedFormula.iff (BoundedFormula.mem (Sum.inr (Fin.last n)) (termSucc x)) (BoundedFormula.or (BoundedFormula.mem (Sum.inr (Fin.last n)) (termSucc y)) (BoundedFormula.mem (Sum.inr (Fin.last n)) (termSucc z))))) v l ↔ interpretTerm V v l x = interpretTerm V v l y ∪ interpretTerm V v l z
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V α : Type n : Nat v : α → V l : Fin n → V x y z : α ⊕ Fin n ⊢ Interpret V (BoundedFormula.all (BoundedFormula.iff (BoundedFormula.mem (Sum.inr (Fin.last n)) (termSucc x)) (BoundedFormula.or (BoundedFormula.mem (Sum.inr (Fin.last n)) (termSucc y)) (BoundedFormula.mem (Sum.inr (Fin.last n)) (termSucc z))))) v l ↔ ∀ (z_1 : V), z_1 ∈ interpretTerm V v l x ↔ z_1 ∈ interpretTerm V v l y ∪ interpretTerm V v l z
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V α : Type n : Nat v : α → V l : Fin n → V x y z : α ⊕ Fin n ⊢ Interpret V (BoundedFormula.all (BoundedFormula.iff (BoundedFormula.mem (Sum.inr (Fin.last n)) (termSucc x)) (BoundedFormula.or (BoundedFormula.mem (Sum.inr (Fin.last n)) (termSucc y)) (BoundedFormula.mem (Sum.inr (Fin.last n)) (termSucc z))))) v l ↔ interpretTerm V v l x = interpretTerm V v l y ∪ interpretTerm V v l z TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Nat.lean
SetTheory.interpret_eqUnion
[16, 1]
[21, 7]
simp
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V α : Type n : Nat v : α → V l : Fin n → V x y z : α ⊕ Fin n ⊢ Interpret V (BoundedFormula.all (BoundedFormula.iff (BoundedFormula.mem (Sum.inr (Fin.last n)) (termSucc x)) (BoundedFormula.or (BoundedFormula.mem (Sum.inr (Fin.last n)) (termSucc y)) (BoundedFormula.mem (Sum.inr (Fin.last n)) (termSucc z))))) v l ↔ ∀ (z_1 : V), z_1 ∈ interpretTerm V v l x ↔ z_1 ∈ interpretTerm V v l y ∪ interpretTerm V v l z
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V α : Type n : Nat v : α → V l : Fin n → V x y z : α ⊕ Fin n ⊢ Interpret V (BoundedFormula.all (BoundedFormula.iff (BoundedFormula.mem (Sum.inr (Fin.last n)) (termSucc x)) (BoundedFormula.or (BoundedFormula.mem (Sum.inr (Fin.last n)) (termSucc y)) (BoundedFormula.mem (Sum.inr (Fin.last n)) (termSucc z))))) v l ↔ ∀ (z_1 : V), z_1 ∈ interpretTerm V v l x ↔ z_1 ∈ interpretTerm V v l y ∪ interpretTerm V v l z TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Nat.lean
SetTheory.interpret_eqSucc
[34, 1]
[38, 7]
unfold BoundedFormula.eqSucc succ
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V α : Type n : Nat v : α → V l : Fin n → V x y : α ⊕ Fin n ⊢ Interpret V (BoundedFormula.eqSucc x y) v l ↔ interpretTerm V v l x = succ (interpretTerm V v l y)
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V α : Type n : Nat v : α → V l : Fin n → V x y : α ⊕ Fin n ⊢ Interpret V (BoundedFormula.exists (BoundedFormula.and (BoundedFormula.eqSingleton (Sum.inr (Fin.last n)) (termSucc y)) (BoundedFormula.eqUnion (termSucc x) (termSucc y) (Sum.inr (Fin.last n))))) v l ↔ interpretTerm V v l x = interpretTerm V v l y ∪ {interpretTerm V v l y}
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V α : Type n : Nat v : α → V l : Fin n → V x y : α ⊕ Fin n ⊢ Interpret V (BoundedFormula.eqSucc x y) v l ↔ interpretTerm V v l x = succ (interpretTerm V v l y) TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Nat.lean
SetTheory.interpret_eqSucc
[34, 1]
[38, 7]
simp
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V α : Type n : Nat v : α → V l : Fin n → V x y : α ⊕ Fin n ⊢ Interpret V (BoundedFormula.exists (BoundedFormula.and (BoundedFormula.eqSingleton (Sum.inr (Fin.last n)) (termSucc y)) (BoundedFormula.eqUnion (termSucc x) (termSucc y) (Sum.inr (Fin.last n))))) v l ↔ interpretTerm V v l x = interpretTerm V v l y ∪ {interpretTerm V v l y}
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V α : Type n : Nat v : α → V l : Fin n → V x y : α ⊕ Fin n ⊢ Interpret V (BoundedFormula.exists (BoundedFormula.and (BoundedFormula.eqSingleton (Sum.inr (Fin.last n)) (termSucc y)) (BoundedFormula.eqUnion (termSucc x) (termSucc y) (Sum.inr (Fin.last n))))) v l ↔ interpretTerm V v l x = interpretTerm V v l y ∪ {interpretTerm V v l y} TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Nat.lean
SetTheory.interpret_eqEmpty
[45, 1]
[49, 7]
unfold BoundedFormula.eqEmpty
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V α : Type n : Nat v : α → V l : Fin n → V x : α ⊕ Fin n ⊢ Interpret V (BoundedFormula.eqEmpty x) v l ↔ interpretTerm V v l x = ∅
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V α : Type n : Nat v : α → V l : Fin n → V x : α ⊕ Fin n ⊢ Interpret V (BoundedFormula.all (BoundedFormula.not (BoundedFormula.mem (Sum.inr (Fin.last n)) (termSucc x)))) v l ↔ interpretTerm V v l x = ∅
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V α : Type n : Nat v : α → V l : Fin n → V x : α ⊕ Fin n ⊢ Interpret V (BoundedFormula.eqEmpty x) v l ↔ interpretTerm V v l x = ∅ TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Nat.lean
SetTheory.interpret_eqEmpty
[45, 1]
[49, 7]
rw [eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V α : Type n : Nat v : α → V l : Fin n → V x : α ⊕ Fin n ⊢ Interpret V (BoundedFormula.all (BoundedFormula.not (BoundedFormula.mem (Sum.inr (Fin.last n)) (termSucc x)))) v l ↔ interpretTerm V v l x = ∅
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V α : Type n : Nat v : α → V l : Fin n → V x : α ⊕ Fin n ⊢ Interpret V (BoundedFormula.all (BoundedFormula.not (BoundedFormula.mem (Sum.inr (Fin.last n)) (termSucc x)))) v l ↔ ∀ (y : V), ¬y ∈ interpretTerm V v l x
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V α : Type n : Nat v : α → V l : Fin n → V x : α ⊕ Fin n ⊢ Interpret V (BoundedFormula.all (BoundedFormula.not (BoundedFormula.mem (Sum.inr (Fin.last n)) (termSucc x)))) v l ↔ interpretTerm V v l x = ∅ TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Nat.lean
SetTheory.interpret_eqEmpty
[45, 1]
[49, 7]
simp
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V α : Type n : Nat v : α → V l : Fin n → V x : α ⊕ Fin n ⊢ Interpret V (BoundedFormula.all (BoundedFormula.not (BoundedFormula.mem (Sum.inr (Fin.last n)) (termSucc x)))) v l ↔ ∀ (y : V), ¬y ∈ interpretTerm V v l x
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V α : Type n : Nat v : α → V l : Fin n → V x : α ⊕ Fin n ⊢ Interpret V (BoundedFormula.all (BoundedFormula.not (BoundedFormula.mem (Sum.inr (Fin.last n)) (termSucc x)))) v l ↔ ∀ (y : V), ¬y ∈ interpretTerm V v l x TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Nat.lean
SetTheory.interpret_succClosed
[65, 1]
[69, 7]
unfold BoundedFormula.succClosed
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V α : Type n : Nat v : α → V l : Fin n → V x : α ⊕ Fin n ⊢ Interpret V (BoundedFormula.succClosed x) v l ↔ ∀ (y : V), y ∈ interpretTerm V v l x → succ y ∈ interpretTerm V v l x
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V α : Type n : Nat v : α → V l : Fin n → V x : α ⊕ Fin n ⊢ Interpret V (BoundedFormula.all (BoundedFormula.imp (BoundedFormula.mem (Sum.inr (Fin.last n)) (termSucc x)) (BoundedFormula.exists (BoundedFormula.and (BoundedFormula.eqSucc (Sum.inr { val := n + 1, isLt := (_ : n + 1 < n + 1 + (0 + 1)) }) (Sum.inr { val := n, isLt := (_ : n < n + (1 + 1)) })) (BoundedFormula.mem (Sum.inr { val := n + 1, isLt := (_ : n + 1 < n + 1 + (0 + 1)) }) (termSucc (termSucc x))))))) v l ↔ ∀ (y : V), y ∈ interpretTerm V v l x → succ y ∈ interpretTerm V v l x
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V α : Type n : Nat v : α → V l : Fin n → V x : α ⊕ Fin n ⊢ Interpret V (BoundedFormula.succClosed x) v l ↔ ∀ (y : V), y ∈ interpretTerm V v l x → succ y ∈ interpretTerm V v l x TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Nat.lean
SetTheory.interpret_succClosed
[65, 1]
[69, 7]
simp
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V α : Type n : Nat v : α → V l : Fin n → V x : α ⊕ Fin n ⊢ Interpret V (BoundedFormula.all (BoundedFormula.imp (BoundedFormula.mem (Sum.inr (Fin.last n)) (termSucc x)) (BoundedFormula.exists (BoundedFormula.and (BoundedFormula.eqSucc (Sum.inr { val := n + 1, isLt := (_ : n + 1 < n + 1 + (0 + 1)) }) (Sum.inr { val := n, isLt := (_ : n < n + (1 + 1)) })) (BoundedFormula.mem (Sum.inr { val := n + 1, isLt := (_ : n + 1 < n + 1 + (0 + 1)) }) (termSucc (termSucc x))))))) v l ↔ ∀ (y : V), y ∈ interpretTerm V v l x → succ y ∈ interpretTerm V v l x
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V α : Type n : Nat v : α → V l : Fin n → V x : α ⊕ Fin n ⊢ Interpret V (BoundedFormula.all (BoundedFormula.imp (BoundedFormula.mem (Sum.inr (Fin.last n)) (termSucc x)) (BoundedFormula.exists (BoundedFormula.and (BoundedFormula.eqSucc (Sum.inr { val := n + 1, isLt := (_ : n + 1 < n + 1 + (0 + 1)) }) (Sum.inr { val := n, isLt := (_ : n < n + (1 + 1)) })) (BoundedFormula.mem (Sum.inr { val := n + 1, isLt := (_ : n + 1 < n + 1 + (0 + 1)) }) (termSucc (termSucc x))))))) v l ↔ ∀ (y : V), y ∈ interpretTerm V v l x → succ y ∈ interpretTerm V v l x TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Nat.lean
SetTheory.inductive_iff
[71, 1]
[76, 21]
constructor
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x : V ⊢ Inductive x ↔ ∅ ∈ x ∧ ∀ (y : V), y ∈ x → succ y ∈ x
case mp V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x : V ⊢ Inductive x → ∅ ∈ x ∧ ∀ (y : V), y ∈ x → succ y ∈ x case mpr V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x : V ⊢ (∅ ∈ x ∧ ∀ (y : V), y ∈ x → succ y ∈ x) → Inductive x
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x : V ⊢ Inductive x ↔ ∅ ∈ x ∧ ∀ (y : V), y ∈ x → succ y ∈ x TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Nat.lean
SetTheory.inductive_iff
[71, 1]
[76, 21]
intro h
case mp V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x : V ⊢ Inductive x → ∅ ∈ x ∧ ∀ (y : V), y ∈ x → succ y ∈ x
case mp V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x : V h : Inductive x ⊢ ∅ ∈ x ∧ ∀ (y : V), y ∈ x → succ y ∈ x
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case mp V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x : V ⊢ Inductive x → ∅ ∈ x ∧ ∀ (y : V), y ∈ x → succ y ∈ x TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Nat.lean
SetTheory.inductive_iff
[71, 1]
[76, 21]
exact ⟨h.empty_mem, h.succ_mem⟩
case mp V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x : V h : Inductive x ⊢ ∅ ∈ x ∧ ∀ (y : V), y ∈ x → succ y ∈ x
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case mp V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x : V h : Inductive x ⊢ ∅ ∈ x ∧ ∀ (y : V), y ∈ x → succ y ∈ x TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Nat.lean
SetTheory.inductive_iff
[71, 1]
[76, 21]
intro h
case mpr V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x : V ⊢ (∅ ∈ x ∧ ∀ (y : V), y ∈ x → succ y ∈ x) → Inductive x
case mpr V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x : V h : ∅ ∈ x ∧ ∀ (y : V), y ∈ x → succ y ∈ x ⊢ Inductive x
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case mpr V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x : V ⊢ (∅ ∈ x ∧ ∀ (y : V), y ∈ x → succ y ∈ x) → Inductive x TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Nat.lean
SetTheory.inductive_iff
[71, 1]
[76, 21]
exact ⟨h.1, h.2⟩
case mpr V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x : V h : ∅ ∈ x ∧ ∀ (y : V), y ∈ x → succ y ∈ x ⊢ Inductive x
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case mpr V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V x : V h : ∅ ∈ x ∧ ∀ (y : V), y ∈ x → succ y ∈ x ⊢ Inductive x TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Nat.lean
SetTheory.interpret_isInductive
[87, 1]
[91, 7]
unfold BoundedFormula.isInductive
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V α : Type n : Nat v : α → V l : Fin n → V x : α ⊕ Fin n ⊢ Interpret V (BoundedFormula.isInductive x) v l ↔ Inductive (interpretTerm V v l x)
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V α : Type n : Nat v : α → V l : Fin n → V x : α ⊕ Fin n ⊢ Interpret V (BoundedFormula.and (BoundedFormula.exists (BoundedFormula.and (BoundedFormula.eqEmpty (Sum.inr (Fin.last n))) (BoundedFormula.mem (Sum.inr (Fin.last n)) (termSucc x)))) (BoundedFormula.succClosed x)) v l ↔ Inductive (interpretTerm V v l x)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V α : Type n : Nat v : α → V l : Fin n → V x : α ⊕ Fin n ⊢ Interpret V (BoundedFormula.isInductive x) v l ↔ Inductive (interpretTerm V v l x) TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Nat.lean
SetTheory.interpret_isInductive
[87, 1]
[91, 7]
rw [inductive_iff]
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V α : Type n : Nat v : α → V l : Fin n → V x : α ⊕ Fin n ⊢ Interpret V (BoundedFormula.and (BoundedFormula.exists (BoundedFormula.and (BoundedFormula.eqEmpty (Sum.inr (Fin.last n))) (BoundedFormula.mem (Sum.inr (Fin.last n)) (termSucc x)))) (BoundedFormula.succClosed x)) v l ↔ Inductive (interpretTerm V v l x)
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V α : Type n : Nat v : α → V l : Fin n → V x : α ⊕ Fin n ⊢ Interpret V (BoundedFormula.and (BoundedFormula.exists (BoundedFormula.and (BoundedFormula.eqEmpty (Sum.inr (Fin.last n))) (BoundedFormula.mem (Sum.inr (Fin.last n)) (termSucc x)))) (BoundedFormula.succClosed x)) v l ↔ ∅ ∈ interpretTerm V v l x ∧ ∀ (y : V), y ∈ interpretTerm V v l x → succ y ∈ interpretTerm V v l x
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V α : Type n : Nat v : α → V l : Fin n → V x : α ⊕ Fin n ⊢ Interpret V (BoundedFormula.and (BoundedFormula.exists (BoundedFormula.and (BoundedFormula.eqEmpty (Sum.inr (Fin.last n))) (BoundedFormula.mem (Sum.inr (Fin.last n)) (termSucc x)))) (BoundedFormula.succClosed x)) v l ↔ Inductive (interpretTerm V v l x) TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Nat.lean
SetTheory.interpret_isInductive
[87, 1]
[91, 7]
simp
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V α : Type n : Nat v : α → V l : Fin n → V x : α ⊕ Fin n ⊢ Interpret V (BoundedFormula.and (BoundedFormula.exists (BoundedFormula.and (BoundedFormula.eqEmpty (Sum.inr (Fin.last n))) (BoundedFormula.mem (Sum.inr (Fin.last n)) (termSucc x)))) (BoundedFormula.succClosed x)) v l ↔ ∅ ∈ interpretTerm V v l x ∧ ∀ (y : V), y ∈ interpretTerm V v l x → succ y ∈ interpretTerm V v l x
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V α : Type n : Nat v : α → V l : Fin n → V x : α ⊕ Fin n ⊢ Interpret V (BoundedFormula.and (BoundedFormula.exists (BoundedFormula.and (BoundedFormula.eqEmpty (Sum.inr (Fin.last n))) (BoundedFormula.mem (Sum.inr (Fin.last n)) (termSucc x)))) (BoundedFormula.succClosed x)) v l ↔ ∅ ∈ interpretTerm V v l x ∧ ∀ (y : V), y ∈ interpretTerm V v l x → succ y ∈ interpretTerm V v l x TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Nat.lean
SetTheory.interpret_isNat'
[99, 1]
[102, 7]
unfold BoundedFormula.isNat
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V α : Type n : Nat v : α → V l : Fin n → V x : α ⊕ Fin n ⊢ Interpret V (BoundedFormula.isNat x) v l ↔ ∀ (y : V), Inductive y → interpretTerm V v l x ∈ y
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V α : Type n : Nat v : α → V l : Fin n → V x : α ⊕ Fin n ⊢ Interpret V (BoundedFormula.all (BoundedFormula.imp (BoundedFormula.isInductive (Sum.inr (Fin.last n))) (BoundedFormula.mem (termSucc x) (Sum.inr (Fin.last n))))) v l ↔ ∀ (y : V), Inductive y → interpretTerm V v l x ∈ y
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V α : Type n : Nat v : α → V l : Fin n → V x : α ⊕ Fin n ⊢ Interpret V (BoundedFormula.isNat x) v l ↔ ∀ (y : V), Inductive y → interpretTerm V v l x ∈ y TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Nat.lean
SetTheory.interpret_isNat'
[99, 1]
[102, 7]
simp
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V α : Type n : Nat v : α → V l : Fin n → V x : α ⊕ Fin n ⊢ Interpret V (BoundedFormula.all (BoundedFormula.imp (BoundedFormula.isInductive (Sum.inr (Fin.last n))) (BoundedFormula.mem (termSucc x) (Sum.inr (Fin.last n))))) v l ↔ ∀ (y : V), Inductive y → interpretTerm V v l x ∈ y
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V α : Type n : Nat v : α → V l : Fin n → V x : α ⊕ Fin n ⊢ Interpret V (BoundedFormula.all (BoundedFormula.imp (BoundedFormula.isInductive (Sum.inr (Fin.last n))) (BoundedFormula.mem (termSucc x) (Sum.inr (Fin.last n))))) v l ↔ ∀ (y : V), Inductive y → interpretTerm V v l x ∈ y TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Nat.lean
SetTheory.mem_ω_iff
[111, 1]
[115, 45]
unfold ω
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V n : V ⊢ n ∈ ω ↔ ∀ (s : V), Inductive s → n ∈ s
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V n : V ⊢ n ∈ sep (BoundedFormula.isNat (Sum.inr 0)) (fun i => Empty.elim i) Infinity.inductiveSet ↔ ∀ (s : V), Inductive s → n ∈ s
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V n : V ⊢ n ∈ ω ↔ ∀ (s : V), Inductive s → n ∈ s TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Nat.lean
SetTheory.mem_ω_iff
[111, 1]
[115, 45]
simp only [mem_sep_iff, interpret_isNat', interpret_inr, and_iff_right_iff_imp]
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V n : V ⊢ n ∈ sep (BoundedFormula.isNat (Sum.inr 0)) (fun i => Empty.elim i) Infinity.inductiveSet ↔ ∀ (s : V), Inductive s → n ∈ s
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V n : V ⊢ (∀ (y : V), Inductive y → n ∈ y) → n ∈ Infinity.inductiveSet
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V n : V ⊢ n ∈ sep (BoundedFormula.isNat (Sum.inr 0)) (fun i => Empty.elim i) Infinity.inductiveSet ↔ ∀ (s : V), Inductive s → n ∈ s TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Nat.lean
SetTheory.mem_ω_iff
[111, 1]
[115, 45]
intro hn
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V n : V ⊢ (∀ (y : V), Inductive y → n ∈ y) → n ∈ Infinity.inductiveSet
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V n : V hn : ∀ (y : V), Inductive y → n ∈ y ⊢ n ∈ Infinity.inductiveSet
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V n : V ⊢ (∀ (y : V), Inductive y → n ∈ y) → n ∈ Infinity.inductiveSet TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Nat.lean
SetTheory.mem_ω_iff
[111, 1]
[115, 45]
exact hn _ Infinity.inductiveSet_inductive
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V n : V hn : ∀ (y : V), Inductive y → n ∈ y ⊢ n ∈ Infinity.inductiveSet
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V n : V hn : ∀ (y : V), Inductive y → n ∈ y ⊢ n ∈ Infinity.inductiveSet TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Nat.lean
SetTheory.interpret_isNat
[118, 1]
[120, 35]
rw [mem_ω_iff, interpret_isNat']
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V α : Type n : Nat v : α → V l : Fin n → V x : α ⊕ Fin n ⊢ Interpret V (BoundedFormula.isNat x) v l ↔ interpretTerm V v l x ∈ ω
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V α : Type n : Nat v : α → V l : Fin n → V x : α ⊕ Fin n ⊢ Interpret V (BoundedFormula.isNat x) v l ↔ interpretTerm V v l x ∈ ω TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Nat.lean
SetTheory.empty_mem_ω
[122, 1]
[125, 21]
rw [mem_ω_iff]
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V ⊢ ∅ ∈ ω
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V ⊢ ∀ (s : V), Inductive s → ∅ ∈ s
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V ⊢ ∅ ∈ ω TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Nat.lean
SetTheory.empty_mem_ω
[122, 1]
[125, 21]
intro s hs
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V ⊢ ∀ (s : V), Inductive s → ∅ ∈ s
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V s : V hs : Inductive s ⊢ ∅ ∈ s
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V ⊢ ∀ (s : V), Inductive s → ∅ ∈ s TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Nat.lean
SetTheory.empty_mem_ω
[122, 1]
[125, 21]
exact hs.empty_mem
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V s : V hs : Inductive s ⊢ ∅ ∈ s
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V s : V hs : Inductive s ⊢ ∅ ∈ s TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Nat.lean
SetTheory.succ_mem_ω
[127, 1]
[130, 32]
rw [mem_ω_iff] at hn ⊢
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V n : V hn : n ∈ ω ⊢ succ n ∈ ω
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V n : V hn : ∀ (s : V), Inductive s → n ∈ s ⊢ ∀ (s : V), Inductive s → succ n ∈ s
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V n : V hn : n ∈ ω ⊢ succ n ∈ ω TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Nat.lean
SetTheory.succ_mem_ω
[127, 1]
[130, 32]
intro s hs
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V n : V hn : ∀ (s : V), Inductive s → n ∈ s ⊢ ∀ (s : V), Inductive s → succ n ∈ s
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V n : V hn : ∀ (s : V), Inductive s → n ∈ s s : V hs : Inductive s ⊢ succ n ∈ s
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V n : V hn : ∀ (s : V), Inductive s → n ∈ s ⊢ ∀ (s : V), Inductive s → succ n ∈ s TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Nat.lean
SetTheory.succ_mem_ω
[127, 1]
[130, 32]
exact hs.succ_mem n (hn s hs)
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V n : V hn : ∀ (s : V), Inductive s → n ∈ s s : V hs : Inductive s ⊢ succ n ∈ s
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V n : V hn : ∀ (s : V), Inductive s → n ∈ s s : V hs : Inductive s ⊢ succ n ∈ s TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Nat.lean
SetTheory.one_def
[145, 1]
[147, 7]
show ∅ ∪ {∅} = {∅}
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V ⊢ 1 = {∅}
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V ⊢ ∅ ∪ {∅} = {∅}
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V ⊢ 1 = {∅} TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Nat.lean
SetTheory.one_def
[145, 1]
[147, 7]
simp
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V ⊢ ∅ ∪ {∅} = {∅}
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V ⊢ ∅ ∪ {∅} = {∅} TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Relation.lean
SetTheory.interpret_isRelation
[17, 1]
[20, 7]
unfold BoundedFormula.isRelation IsRelation
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r✝ x y z : V α : Type n : Nat v : α → V l : Fin n → V r : α ⊕ Fin n ⊢ Interpret V (BoundedFormula.isRelation r) v l ↔ IsRelation (interpretTerm V v l r)
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r✝ x y z : V α : Type n : Nat v : α → V l : Fin n → V r : α ⊕ Fin n ⊢ Interpret V (BoundedFormula.all (BoundedFormula.imp (BoundedFormula.mem (Sum.inr (Fin.last n)) (termSucc r)) (BoundedFormula.isOPair (Sum.inr (Fin.last n))))) v l ↔ ∀ (p : V), p ∈ interpretTerm V v l r → IsOPair p
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r✝ x y z : V α : Type n : Nat v : α → V l : Fin n → V r : α ⊕ Fin n ⊢ Interpret V (BoundedFormula.isRelation r) v l ↔ IsRelation (interpretTerm V v l r) TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Relation.lean
SetTheory.interpret_isRelation
[17, 1]
[20, 7]
simp
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r✝ x y z : V α : Type n : Nat v : α → V l : Fin n → V r : α ⊕ Fin n ⊢ Interpret V (BoundedFormula.all (BoundedFormula.imp (BoundedFormula.mem (Sum.inr (Fin.last n)) (termSucc r)) (BoundedFormula.isOPair (Sum.inr (Fin.last n))))) v l ↔ ∀ (p : V), p ∈ interpretTerm V v l r → IsOPair p
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r✝ x y z : V α : Type n : Nat v : α → V l : Fin n → V r : α ⊕ Fin n ⊢ Interpret V (BoundedFormula.all (BoundedFormula.imp (BoundedFormula.mem (Sum.inr (Fin.last n)) (termSucc r)) (BoundedFormula.isOPair (Sum.inr (Fin.last n))))) v l ↔ ∀ (p : V), p ∈ interpretTerm V v l r → IsOPair p TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Relation.lean
SetTheory.opair_left_mem_sUnion_sUnion
[22, 1]
[27, 27]
simp only [mem_sUnion_iff]
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x y z : V hxyr : opair x y ∈ r ⊢ x ∈ ⋃ ⋃ r
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x y z : V hxyr : opair x y ∈ r ⊢ ∃ t, (∃ t_1, t_1 ∈ r ∧ t ∈ t_1) ∧ x ∈ t
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x y z : V hxyr : opair x y ∈ r ⊢ x ∈ ⋃ ⋃ r TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Relation.lean
SetTheory.opair_left_mem_sUnion_sUnion
[22, 1]
[27, 27]
refine ⟨{x}, ⟨_, hxyr, ?_⟩, ?_⟩
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x y z : V hxyr : opair x y ∈ r ⊢ ∃ t, (∃ t_1, t_1 ∈ r ∧ t ∈ t_1) ∧ x ∈ t
case refine_1 V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x y z : V hxyr : opair x y ∈ r ⊢ {x} ∈ opair x y case refine_2 V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x y z : V hxyr : opair x y ∈ r ⊢ x ∈ {x}
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x y z : V hxyr : opair x y ∈ r ⊢ ∃ t, (∃ t_1, t_1 ∈ r ∧ t ∈ t_1) ∧ x ∈ t TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Relation.lean
SetTheory.opair_left_mem_sUnion_sUnion
[22, 1]
[27, 27]
simp only [opair, mem_pair_iff, true_or]
case refine_1 V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x y z : V hxyr : opair x y ∈ r ⊢ {x} ∈ opair x y
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case refine_1 V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x y z : V hxyr : opair x y ∈ r ⊢ {x} ∈ opair x y TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Relation.lean
SetTheory.opair_left_mem_sUnion_sUnion
[22, 1]
[27, 27]
rw [mem_singleton_iff]
case refine_2 V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x y z : V hxyr : opair x y ∈ r ⊢ x ∈ {x}
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case refine_2 V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x y z : V hxyr : opair x y ∈ r ⊢ x ∈ {x} TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Relation.lean
SetTheory.opair_right_mem_sUnion_sUnion
[29, 1]
[34, 25]
simp only [mem_sUnion_iff]
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x y z : V hxyr : opair x y ∈ r ⊢ y ∈ ⋃ ⋃ r
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x y z : V hxyr : opair x y ∈ r ⊢ ∃ t, (∃ t_1, t_1 ∈ r ∧ t ∈ t_1) ∧ y ∈ t
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x y z : V hxyr : opair x y ∈ r ⊢ y ∈ ⋃ ⋃ r TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Relation.lean
SetTheory.opair_right_mem_sUnion_sUnion
[29, 1]
[34, 25]
refine ⟨pair x y, ⟨_, hxyr, ?_⟩, ?_⟩
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x y z : V hxyr : opair x y ∈ r ⊢ ∃ t, (∃ t_1, t_1 ∈ r ∧ t ∈ t_1) ∧ y ∈ t
case refine_1 V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x y z : V hxyr : opair x y ∈ r ⊢ pair x y ∈ opair x y case refine_2 V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x y z : V hxyr : opair x y ∈ r ⊢ y ∈ pair x y
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x y z : V hxyr : opair x y ∈ r ⊢ ∃ t, (∃ t_1, t_1 ∈ r ∧ t ∈ t_1) ∧ y ∈ t TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Relation.lean
SetTheory.opair_right_mem_sUnion_sUnion
[29, 1]
[34, 25]
simp only [opair, mem_pair_iff, or_true]
case refine_1 V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x y z : V hxyr : opair x y ∈ r ⊢ pair x y ∈ opair x y
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case refine_1 V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x y z : V hxyr : opair x y ∈ r ⊢ pair x y ∈ opair x y TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Relation.lean
SetTheory.opair_right_mem_sUnion_sUnion
[29, 1]
[34, 25]
exact right_mem_pair
case refine_2 V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x y z : V hxyr : opair x y ∈ r ⊢ y ∈ pair x y
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case refine_2 V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x y z : V hxyr : opair x y ∈ r ⊢ y ∈ pair x y TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Relation.lean
SetTheory.interpret_memDom'
[43, 1]
[47, 7]
unfold BoundedFormula.memDom
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r✝ x✝ y z : V α : Type n : Nat v : α → V l : Fin n → V x r : α ⊕ Fin n ⊢ Interpret V (BoundedFormula.memDom x r) v l ↔ ∃ z, opair (interpretTerm V v l x) z ∈ interpretTerm V v l r
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r✝ x✝ y z : V α : Type n : Nat v : α → V l : Fin n → V x r : α ⊕ Fin n ⊢ Interpret V (BoundedFormula.exists (BoundedFormula.exists (BoundedFormula.and (BoundedFormula.eqOPair (Sum.inr { val := n + 1, isLt := (_ : n + 1 < n + 1 + (0 + 1)) }) (termSucc (termSucc x)) (Sum.inr { val := n, isLt := (_ : n < n + (1 + 1)) })) (BoundedFormula.mem (Sum.inr { val := n + 1, isLt := (_ : n + 1 < n + 1 + (0 + 1)) }) (termSucc (termSucc r)))))) v l ↔ ∃ z, opair (interpretTerm V v l x) z ∈ interpretTerm V v l r
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r✝ x✝ y z : V α : Type n : Nat v : α → V l : Fin n → V x r : α ⊕ Fin n ⊢ Interpret V (BoundedFormula.memDom x r) v l ↔ ∃ z, opair (interpretTerm V v l x) z ∈ interpretTerm V v l r TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Relation.lean
SetTheory.interpret_memDom'
[43, 1]
[47, 7]
simp
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r✝ x✝ y z : V α : Type n : Nat v : α → V l : Fin n → V x r : α ⊕ Fin n ⊢ Interpret V (BoundedFormula.exists (BoundedFormula.exists (BoundedFormula.and (BoundedFormula.eqOPair (Sum.inr { val := n + 1, isLt := (_ : n + 1 < n + 1 + (0 + 1)) }) (termSucc (termSucc x)) (Sum.inr { val := n, isLt := (_ : n < n + (1 + 1)) })) (BoundedFormula.mem (Sum.inr { val := n + 1, isLt := (_ : n + 1 < n + 1 + (0 + 1)) }) (termSucc (termSucc r)))))) v l ↔ ∃ z, opair (interpretTerm V v l x) z ∈ interpretTerm V v l r
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r✝ x✝ y z : V α : Type n : Nat v : α → V l : Fin n → V x r : α ⊕ Fin n ⊢ Interpret V (BoundedFormula.exists (BoundedFormula.exists (BoundedFormula.and (BoundedFormula.eqOPair (Sum.inr { val := n + 1, isLt := (_ : n + 1 < n + 1 + (0 + 1)) }) (termSucc (termSucc x)) (Sum.inr { val := n, isLt := (_ : n < n + (1 + 1)) })) (BoundedFormula.mem (Sum.inr { val := n + 1, isLt := (_ : n + 1 < n + 1 + (0 + 1)) }) (termSucc (termSucc r)))))) v l ↔ ∃ z, opair (interpretTerm V v l x) z ∈ interpretTerm V v l r TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Relation.lean
SetTheory.mem_dom_iff
[52, 1]
[57, 37]
unfold dom
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x y z : V ⊢ x ∈ dom r ↔ ∃ z, opair x z ∈ r
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x y z : V ⊢ x ∈ sep (BoundedFormula.memDom (Sum.inr 0) (Sum.inl ())) (fun x => r) (⋃ ⋃ r) ↔ ∃ z, opair x z ∈ r
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x y z : V ⊢ x ∈ dom r ↔ ∃ z, opair x z ∈ r TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Relation.lean
SetTheory.mem_dom_iff
[52, 1]
[57, 37]
simp only [mem_sep_iff, interpret_memDom', interpret_inr, interpret_inl, and_iff_right_iff_imp, forall_exists_index]
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x y z : V ⊢ x ∈ sep (BoundedFormula.memDom (Sum.inr 0) (Sum.inl ())) (fun x => r) (⋃ ⋃ r) ↔ ∃ z, opair x z ∈ r
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x y z : V ⊢ ∀ (x_1 : V), opair x x_1 ∈ r → x ∈ ⋃ ⋃ r
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x y z : V ⊢ x ∈ sep (BoundedFormula.memDom (Sum.inr 0) (Sum.inl ())) (fun x => r) (⋃ ⋃ r) ↔ ∃ z, opair x z ∈ r TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Relation.lean
SetTheory.mem_dom_iff
[52, 1]
[57, 37]
intro t
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x y z : V ⊢ ∀ (x_1 : V), opair x x_1 ∈ r → x ∈ ⋃ ⋃ r
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x y z t : V ⊢ opair x t ∈ r → x ∈ ⋃ ⋃ r
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x y z : V ⊢ ∀ (x_1 : V), opair x x_1 ∈ r → x ∈ ⋃ ⋃ r TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Relation.lean
SetTheory.mem_dom_iff
[52, 1]
[57, 37]
exact opair_left_mem_sUnion_sUnion
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x y z t : V ⊢ opair x t ∈ r → x ∈ ⋃ ⋃ r
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x y z t : V ⊢ opair x t ∈ r → x ∈ ⋃ ⋃ r TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Relation.lean
SetTheory.interpret_memDom
[60, 1]
[62, 38]
rw [mem_dom_iff, interpret_memDom']
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r✝ x✝ y z : V α : Type n : Nat v : α → V l : Fin n → V x r : α ⊕ Fin n ⊢ Interpret V (BoundedFormula.memDom x r) v l ↔ interpretTerm V v l x ∈ dom (interpretTerm V v l r)
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r✝ x✝ y z : V α : Type n : Nat v : α → V l : Fin n → V x r : α ⊕ Fin n ⊢ Interpret V (BoundedFormula.memDom x r) v l ↔ interpretTerm V v l x ∈ dom (interpretTerm V v l r) TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Relation.lean
SetTheory.interpret_memRan'
[71, 1]
[75, 7]
unfold BoundedFormula.memRan
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r✝ x✝ y z : V α : Type n : Nat v : α → V l : Fin n → V x r : α ⊕ Fin n ⊢ Interpret V (BoundedFormula.memRan x r) v l ↔ ∃ z, opair z (interpretTerm V v l x) ∈ interpretTerm V v l r
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r✝ x✝ y z : V α : Type n : Nat v : α → V l : Fin n → V x r : α ⊕ Fin n ⊢ Interpret V (BoundedFormula.exists (BoundedFormula.exists (BoundedFormula.and (BoundedFormula.eqOPair (Sum.inr { val := n + 1, isLt := (_ : n + 1 < n + 1 + (0 + 1)) }) (Sum.inr { val := n, isLt := (_ : n < n + (1 + 1)) }) (termSucc (termSucc x))) (BoundedFormula.mem (Sum.inr { val := n + 1, isLt := (_ : n + 1 < n + 1 + (0 + 1)) }) (termSucc (termSucc r)))))) v l ↔ ∃ z, opair z (interpretTerm V v l x) ∈ interpretTerm V v l r
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r✝ x✝ y z : V α : Type n : Nat v : α → V l : Fin n → V x r : α ⊕ Fin n ⊢ Interpret V (BoundedFormula.memRan x r) v l ↔ ∃ z, opair z (interpretTerm V v l x) ∈ interpretTerm V v l r TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Relation.lean
SetTheory.interpret_memRan'
[71, 1]
[75, 7]
simp
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r✝ x✝ y z : V α : Type n : Nat v : α → V l : Fin n → V x r : α ⊕ Fin n ⊢ Interpret V (BoundedFormula.exists (BoundedFormula.exists (BoundedFormula.and (BoundedFormula.eqOPair (Sum.inr { val := n + 1, isLt := (_ : n + 1 < n + 1 + (0 + 1)) }) (Sum.inr { val := n, isLt := (_ : n < n + (1 + 1)) }) (termSucc (termSucc x))) (BoundedFormula.mem (Sum.inr { val := n + 1, isLt := (_ : n + 1 < n + 1 + (0 + 1)) }) (termSucc (termSucc r)))))) v l ↔ ∃ z, opair z (interpretTerm V v l x) ∈ interpretTerm V v l r
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r✝ x✝ y z : V α : Type n : Nat v : α → V l : Fin n → V x r : α ⊕ Fin n ⊢ Interpret V (BoundedFormula.exists (BoundedFormula.exists (BoundedFormula.and (BoundedFormula.eqOPair (Sum.inr { val := n + 1, isLt := (_ : n + 1 < n + 1 + (0 + 1)) }) (Sum.inr { val := n, isLt := (_ : n < n + (1 + 1)) }) (termSucc (termSucc x))) (BoundedFormula.mem (Sum.inr { val := n + 1, isLt := (_ : n + 1 < n + 1 + (0 + 1)) }) (termSucc (termSucc r)))))) v l ↔ ∃ z, opair z (interpretTerm V v l x) ∈ interpretTerm V v l r TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Relation.lean
SetTheory.mem_ran_iff
[80, 1]
[85, 38]
unfold ran
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x y z : V ⊢ x ∈ ran r ↔ ∃ z, opair z x ∈ r
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x y z : V ⊢ x ∈ sep (BoundedFormula.memRan (Sum.inr 0) (Sum.inl ())) (fun x => r) (⋃ ⋃ r) ↔ ∃ z, opair z x ∈ r
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x y z : V ⊢ x ∈ ran r ↔ ∃ z, opair z x ∈ r TACTIC:
https://github.com/zeramorphic/set-theory.git
37e9d6e920ff687317f50fa33984b273f1637716
SetTheory/Relation.lean
SetTheory.mem_ran_iff
[80, 1]
[85, 38]
simp only [mem_sep_iff, interpret_memRan', interpret_inr, interpret_inl, and_iff_right_iff_imp, forall_exists_index]
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x y z : V ⊢ x ∈ sep (BoundedFormula.memRan (Sum.inr 0) (Sum.inl ())) (fun x => r) (⋃ ⋃ r) ↔ ∃ z, opair z x ∈ r
V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x y z : V ⊢ ∀ (x_1 : V), opair x_1 x ∈ r → x ∈ ⋃ ⋃ r
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: V : Type u_1 inst✝ : Zermelo V r x y z : V ⊢ x ∈ sep (BoundedFormula.memRan (Sum.inr 0) (Sum.inl ())) (fun x => r) (⋃ ⋃ r) ↔ ∃ z, opair z x ∈ r TACTIC: