id stringlengths 16 16 | task_family stringclasses 20
values | task_type stringclasses 20
values | domain stringclasses 14
values | difficulty stringclasses 5
values | difficulty_label stringclasses 5
values | language stringclasses 1
value | instruction stringlengths 54 90 | context stringlengths 0 82 | response stringlengths 1 330 | analysis_plan stringclasses 10
values | verification stringclasses 10
values | verification_type stringclasses 7
values | prompt_review stringclasses 2
values | prompt_alignment stringclasses 3
values | constraint_check stringclasses 3
values | consistency_check stringclasses 2
values | math_check stringclasses 3
values | logic_check stringclasses 3
values | counterexample_check stringclasses 2
values | data_analysis_check stringclasses 3
values | code_check stringclasses 3
values | evidence_check stringclasses 3
values | source_check stringclasses 3
values | hallucination_control stringclasses 10
values | error_detection stringclasses 10
values | error_repair stringclasses 10
values | answerability stringclasses 2
values | confidence float32 0.85 1 | uncertainty float32 0 0.15 | reasoning_depth int16 1 4 | minimal_sufficient_reasoning bool 1
class | unnecessary_reasoning bool 1
class | stop_condition stringclasses 10
values | surface_variation int32 0 16 | numeric_variation int32 0 96 | structure_variation int32 0 30 | ood_style int32 0 12 | quality_score float32 0.9 0.9 | synthetic bool 1
class | license stringclasses 1
value | generator_version stringclasses 1
value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
mtd-000097999300 | planning | planning_analysis | general_reasoning | easy | easy | en | Create a concise plan for solving a complex technical problem. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999300. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 12 | 6 | 23 | 9 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999301 | adversarial | adversarial_analysis | general_reasoning | easy | easy | en | Identify a plausible failure mode in the proposed reasoning. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999301. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 13 | 7 | 24 | 10 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999302 | consistency_check | consistency_check_analysis | general_reasoning | easy | easy | en | Check whether the supplied statements are mutually consistent. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999302. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 14 | 8 | 25 | 11 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999303 | adversarial | adversarial_analysis | general_reasoning | easy | easy | en | Identify a plausible failure mode in the proposed reasoning. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999303. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 15 | 9 | 26 | 12 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999304 | error_analysis | error_analysis_analysis | general_reasoning | easy | easy | en | Classify the likely cause of an incorrect answer and propose a repair. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999304. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 16 | 10 | 27 | 0 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999305 | code | function_generation | programming | easy | easy | en | Write Python code that returns the square of an integer. | Input example: n = 58247 | def square(n):
return n * n | Identify required input/output and implement minimal function. | Static code contract check. | static_contract | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | No external API assumptions. | Check function signature and operation. | Correct implementation if contract is violated. | answerable | 0.99 | 0.01 | 1 | true | false | Stop after contract verification. | 0 | 11 | 28 | 1 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000097999306 | code | function_generation | programming | easy | easy | en | Write Python code that returns the square of an integer. | Input example: n = 3436 | def square(n):
return n * n | Identify required input/output and implement minimal function. | Static code contract check. | static_contract | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | No external API assumptions. | Check function signature and operation. | Correct implementation if contract is violated. | answerable | 0.99 | 0.01 | 1 | true | false | Stop after contract verification. | 1 | 12 | 29 | 2 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000097999307 | generalization | generalization_analysis | general_reasoning | easy | easy | en | Explain how to test whether a model generalizes beyond familiar examples. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999307. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 2 | 13 | 30 | 3 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999308 | ambiguity | ambiguity_analysis | general_reasoning | easy | easy | en | Identify ambiguity in the request and state what information is missing. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999308. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 3 | 14 | 0 | 4 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999309 | prompt_review | prompt_review_analysis | general_reasoning | easy | easy | en | Review the prompt for ambiguity, contradictions, and missing constraints. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999309. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 4 | 15 | 1 | 5 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999310 | error_analysis | error_analysis_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Classify the likely cause of an incorrect answer and propose a repair. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999310. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 5 | 16 | 2 | 6 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999311 | logic | deductive_reasoning | logic | medium | medium | en | Determine whether the conclusion follows from the given statements. | If x > 85, then x is positive.
x = 85.
y = 97. | Conclusion: x is positive.
Result: Yes. | Identify premises, apply implication, verify conclusion. | Logical consistency check. | symbolic | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | Reason only from supplied premises. | Check whether conclusion is entailed. | Re-evaluate premises if conclusion conflicts. | answerable | 0.99 | 0.01 | 2 | true | false | Stop once entailment is established. | 6 | 17 | 3 | 7 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000097999312 | ambiguity | ambiguity_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Identify ambiguity in the request and state what information is missing. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999312. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 7 | 18 | 4 | 8 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999313 | code | function_generation | programming | medium | medium | en | Write Python code that returns the square of an integer. | Input example: n = 36131 | def square(n):
return n * n | Identify required input/output and implement minimal function. | Static code contract check. | static_contract | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | No external API assumptions. | Check function signature and operation. | Correct implementation if contract is violated. | answerable | 0.99 | 0.01 | 1 | true | false | Stop after contract verification. | 8 | 19 | 5 | 9 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000097999314 | research | research_methodology | astronomy | medium | medium | en | Design a rigorous research procedure for investigating a question about astronomy. | The procedure must distinguish evidence from assumptions and identify uncertainty. | 1. Define the research question precisely.
2. Identify measurable variables and hypotheses.
3. Select appropriate primary and secondary sources.
4. Record provenance for each important claim.
5. Compare independent evidence.
6. Identify uncertainty and alternative explanations.
7. Report conclusions separately from obs... | Define question, gather evidence, evaluate sources, quantify uncertainty. | Methodological consistency check. | methodological | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | required | required | Do not invent sources or findings. | Detect unsupported claims. | Remove or qualify unsupported claims. | answerable | 0.92 | 0.08 | 4 | true | false | Stop when methodology is complete and internally coherent. | 9 | 20 | 6 | 10 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000097999315 | error_analysis | error_analysis_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Classify the likely cause of an incorrect answer and propose a repair. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999315. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 10 | 21 | 7 | 11 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999316 | logic | deductive_reasoning | logic | medium | medium | en | Determine whether the conclusion follows from the given statements. | If x > 57, then x is positive.
x = 57.
y = 76. | Conclusion: x is positive.
Result: Yes. | Identify premises, apply implication, verify conclusion. | Logical consistency check. | symbolic | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | Reason only from supplied premises. | Check whether conclusion is entailed. | Re-evaluate premises if conclusion conflicts. | answerable | 0.99 | 0.01 | 2 | true | false | Stop once entailment is established. | 11 | 22 | 8 | 12 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000097999317 | evidence_check | evidence_check_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Identify which claims require evidence before they can be asserted confidently. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999317. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 12 | 23 | 9 | 0 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999318 | code | function_generation | programming | medium | medium | en | Write Python code that returns the square of an integer. | Input example: n = 28333 | def square(n):
return n * n | Identify required input/output and implement minimal function. | Static code contract check. | static_contract | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | No external API assumptions. | Check function signature and operation. | Correct implementation if contract is violated. | answerable | 0.99 | 0.01 | 1 | true | false | Stop after contract verification. | 13 | 24 | 10 | 1 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000097999319 | calibration | calibration_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Explain when a system should reduce confidence in its answer. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999319. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 14 | 25 | 11 | 2 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999320 | ambiguity | ambiguity_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Identify ambiguity in the request and state what information is missing. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999320. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 15 | 26 | 12 | 3 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999321 | counterexample | counterexample_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Construct a counterexample that tests whether a general claim always holds. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999321. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 16 | 27 | 13 | 4 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999322 | adversarial | adversarial_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Identify a plausible failure mode in the proposed reasoning. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999322. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 0 | 28 | 14 | 5 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999323 | evidence_check | evidence_check_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Identify which claims require evidence before they can be asserted confidently. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999323. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 1 | 29 | 15 | 6 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999324 | adversarial | adversarial_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Identify a plausible failure mode in the proposed reasoning. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999324. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 2 | 30 | 16 | 7 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999325 | generalization | generalization_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Explain how to test whether a model generalizes beyond familiar examples. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999325. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 3 | 31 | 17 | 8 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999326 | math | arithmetic | mathematics | medium | medium | en | Solve the following arithmetic problem exactly: 619959 + 27623 | 647582 | Identify operation, compute exactly, verify result. | Exact arithmetic verification. | exact | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | Use only supplied operands. | Check arithmetic operation. | Recompute if mismatch detected. | answerable | 1 | 0 | 1 | true | false | Stop after exact verification. | 4 | 32 | 18 | 9 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999327 | self_correction | error_repair | mathematics | medium | medium | en | Identify and correct the numerical error in the proposed answer. | Problem: 64 + 65
Proposed answer: 136 | The proposed answer is incorrect. The correct answer is 129. | Recompute independently, compare with proposal, repair mismatch. | Independent recomputation. | exact | passed | Do not trust the proposed answer without verification. | passed | passed | answerable | 1 | 0 | 3 | true | false | Stop after independent correction. | 5 | 33 | 19 | 10 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||||||
mtd-000097999328 | generalization | generalization_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Explain how to test whether a model generalizes beyond familiar examples. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999328. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 6 | 34 | 20 | 11 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999329 | self_correction | error_repair | mathematics | medium | medium | en | Identify and correct the numerical error in the proposed answer. | Problem: 70 + 58
Proposed answer: 134 | The proposed answer is incorrect. The correct answer is 128. | Recompute independently, compare with proposal, repair mismatch. | Independent recomputation. | exact | passed | Do not trust the proposed answer without verification. | passed | passed | answerable | 1 | 0 | 3 | true | false | Stop after independent correction. | 7 | 35 | 21 | 12 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||||||
mtd-000097999330 | constraint_reasoning | constraint_reasoning_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Solve a problem while respecting multiple explicit constraints. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999330. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 8 | 36 | 22 | 0 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999331 | ambiguity | ambiguity_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Identify ambiguity in the request and state what information is missing. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999331. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 9 | 37 | 23 | 1 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999332 | calibration | calibration_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Explain when a system should reduce confidence in its answer. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999332. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 10 | 38 | 24 | 2 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999333 | logic | deductive_reasoning | logic | medium | medium | en | Determine whether the conclusion follows from the given statements. | If x > 5, then x is positive.
x = 5.
y = 85. | Conclusion: x is positive.
Result: Yes. | Identify premises, apply implication, verify conclusion. | Logical consistency check. | symbolic | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | Reason only from supplied premises. | Check whether conclusion is entailed. | Re-evaluate premises if conclusion conflicts. | answerable | 0.99 | 0.01 | 2 | true | false | Stop once entailment is established. | 11 | 39 | 25 | 3 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000097999334 | research | research_methodology | machine learning | medium | medium | en | Design a rigorous research procedure for investigating a question about machine learning. | The procedure must distinguish evidence from assumptions and identify uncertainty. | 1. Define the research question precisely.
2. Identify measurable variables and hypotheses.
3. Select appropriate primary and secondary sources.
4. Record provenance for each important claim.
5. Compare independent evidence.
6. Identify uncertainty and alternative explanations.
7. Report conclusions separately from obs... | Define question, gather evidence, evaluate sources, quantify uncertainty. | Methodological consistency check. | methodological | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | required | required | Do not invent sources or findings. | Detect unsupported claims. | Remove or qualify unsupported claims. | answerable | 0.92 | 0.08 | 4 | true | false | Stop when methodology is complete and internally coherent. | 12 | 40 | 26 | 4 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000097999335 | prompt_review | prompt_review_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Review the prompt for ambiguity, contradictions, and missing constraints. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999335. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 13 | 41 | 27 | 5 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999336 | fact_check | claim_verification | general_knowledge | medium | medium | en | Assess the claim and state whether it is correct. Do not invent evidence. | All metals are liquid at room temperature. | Assessment: Incorrect.
A reliable fact-check should verify the claim against an appropriate authoritative source. | Parse claim, identify factual assertion, verify against reliable evidence. | External evidence should be checked for real-world factual claims. | evidence | required | required | Never fabricate a citation. | Identify unsupported factual certainty. | Qualify or verify the claim. | answerable | 0.85 | 0.15 | 3 | true | false | Stop after evidence requirement is identified. | 14 | 42 | 28 | 6 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||||||
mtd-000097999337 | generalization | generalization_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Explain how to test whether a model generalizes beyond familiar examples. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999337. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 15 | 43 | 29 | 7 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999338 | generalization | generalization_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Explain how to test whether a model generalizes beyond familiar examples. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999338. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 16 | 44 | 30 | 8 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999339 | prompt_review | prompt_review_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Review the prompt for ambiguity, contradictions, and missing constraints. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999339. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 0 | 45 | 0 | 9 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999340 | calibration | calibration_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Explain when a system should reduce confidence in its answer. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999340. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 1 | 46 | 1 | 10 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999341 | evidence_check | evidence_check_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Identify which claims require evidence before they can be asserted confidently. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999341. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 2 | 47 | 2 | 11 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999342 | error_analysis | error_analysis_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Classify the likely cause of an incorrect answer and propose a repair. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999342. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 3 | 48 | 3 | 12 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999343 | generalization | generalization_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Explain how to test whether a model generalizes beyond familiar examples. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999343. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 4 | 49 | 4 | 0 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999344 | error_analysis | error_analysis_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Classify the likely cause of an incorrect answer and propose a repair. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999344. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 5 | 50 | 5 | 1 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999345 | self_correction | error_repair | mathematics | hard | hard | en | Identify and correct the numerical error in the proposed answer. | Problem: 38 + 19
Proposed answer: 62 | The proposed answer is incorrect. The correct answer is 57. | Recompute independently, compare with proposal, repair mismatch. | Independent recomputation. | exact | passed | Do not trust the proposed answer without verification. | passed | passed | answerable | 1 | 0 | 3 | true | false | Stop after independent correction. | 6 | 51 | 6 | 2 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||||||
mtd-000097999346 | evidence_check | evidence_check_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Identify which claims require evidence before they can be asserted confidently. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999346. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 7 | 52 | 7 | 3 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999347 | counterexample | counterexample_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Construct a counterexample that tests whether a general claim always holds. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999347. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 8 | 53 | 8 | 4 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999348 | research | research_methodology | materials science | hard | hard | en | Design a rigorous research procedure for investigating a question about materials science. | The procedure must distinguish evidence from assumptions and identify uncertainty. | 1. Define the research question precisely.
2. Identify measurable variables and hypotheses.
3. Select appropriate primary and secondary sources.
4. Record provenance for each important claim.
5. Compare independent evidence.
6. Identify uncertainty and alternative explanations.
7. Report conclusions separately from obs... | Define question, gather evidence, evaluate sources, quantify uncertainty. | Methodological consistency check. | methodological | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | required | required | Do not invent sources or findings. | Detect unsupported claims. | Remove or qualify unsupported claims. | answerable | 0.92 | 0.08 | 4 | true | false | Stop when methodology is complete and internally coherent. | 9 | 54 | 9 | 5 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000097999349 | planning | planning_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Create a concise plan for solving a complex technical problem. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999349. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 10 | 55 | 10 | 6 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999350 | logic | deductive_reasoning | logic | hard | hard | en | Determine whether the conclusion follows from the given statements. | If x > 3, then x is positive.
x = 3.
y = 46. | Conclusion: x is positive.
Result: Yes. | Identify premises, apply implication, verify conclusion. | Logical consistency check. | symbolic | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | Reason only from supplied premises. | Check whether conclusion is entailed. | Re-evaluate premises if conclusion conflicts. | answerable | 0.99 | 0.01 | 2 | true | false | Stop once entailment is established. | 11 | 56 | 11 | 7 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000097999351 | code | function_generation | programming | hard | hard | en | Write Python code that returns the square of an integer. | Input example: n = 27845 | def square(n):
return n * n | Identify required input/output and implement minimal function. | Static code contract check. | static_contract | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | No external API assumptions. | Check function signature and operation. | Correct implementation if contract is violated. | answerable | 0.99 | 0.01 | 1 | true | false | Stop after contract verification. | 12 | 57 | 12 | 8 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000097999352 | prompt_review | prompt_review_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Review the prompt for ambiguity, contradictions, and missing constraints. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999352. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 13 | 58 | 13 | 9 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999353 | reasoning | comparison | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Compare two quantities and explain the comparison using only the provided values. | A = 43, B = 66 | B is greater than A by 23. | Compare values and compute difference. | Check comparison and difference. | exact | passed | passed | Use only supplied values. | Check comparison direction. | Recompute difference. | answerable | 1 | 0 | 2 | true | false | Stop after comparison verification. | 14 | 59 | 14 | 10 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||||||
mtd-000097999354 | counterexample | counterexample_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Construct a counterexample that tests whether a general claim always holds. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999354. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 15 | 60 | 15 | 11 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999355 | generalization | generalization_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Explain how to test whether a model generalizes beyond familiar examples. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999355. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 16 | 61 | 16 | 12 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999356 | prompt_review | prompt_review_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Review the prompt for ambiguity, contradictions, and missing constraints. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999356. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 0 | 62 | 17 | 0 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999357 | prompt_review | prompt_review_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Review the prompt for ambiguity, contradictions, and missing constraints. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999357. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 1 | 63 | 18 | 1 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999358 | fact_check | claim_verification | general_knowledge | hard | hard | en | Assess the claim and state whether it is correct. Do not invent evidence. | A triangle has four sides. | Assessment: Incorrect.
A reliable fact-check should verify the claim against an appropriate authoritative source. | Parse claim, identify factual assertion, verify against reliable evidence. | External evidence should be checked for real-world factual claims. | evidence | required | required | Never fabricate a citation. | Identify unsupported factual certainty. | Qualify or verify the claim. | answerable | 0.85 | 0.15 | 3 | true | false | Stop after evidence requirement is identified. | 2 | 64 | 19 | 2 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||||||
mtd-000097999359 | data_analysis | descriptive_statistics | statistics | hard | hard | en | Calculate the arithmetic mean of the supplied dataset. | Dataset: 95, 78, 14, 29, 12 | Mean = 45.6000 | Parse values, sum them, divide by count, verify. | Recompute sum and count. | exact | passed | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | Use only supplied dataset. | Check arithmetic and denominator. | Recompute statistic. | answerable | 1 | 0 | 2 | true | false | Stop after numerical verification. | 3 | 65 | 20 | 3 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000097999360 | error_analysis | error_analysis_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Classify the likely cause of an incorrect answer and propose a repair. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999360. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 4 | 66 | 21 | 4 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999361 | generalization | generalization_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Explain how to test whether a model generalizes beyond familiar examples. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999361. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 5 | 67 | 22 | 5 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999362 | research | research_methodology | climate science | hard | hard | en | Design a rigorous research procedure for investigating a question about climate science. | The procedure must distinguish evidence from assumptions and identify uncertainty. | 1. Define the research question precisely.
2. Identify measurable variables and hypotheses.
3. Select appropriate primary and secondary sources.
4. Record provenance for each important claim.
5. Compare independent evidence.
6. Identify uncertainty and alternative explanations.
7. Report conclusions separately from obs... | Define question, gather evidence, evaluate sources, quantify uncertainty. | Methodological consistency check. | methodological | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | required | required | Do not invent sources or findings. | Detect unsupported claims. | Remove or qualify unsupported claims. | answerable | 0.92 | 0.08 | 4 | true | false | Stop when methodology is complete and internally coherent. | 6 | 68 | 23 | 6 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000097999363 | math | arithmetic | mathematics | hard | hard | en | Solve the following arithmetic problem exactly: 995758 - 400612 | 595146 | Identify operation, compute exactly, verify result. | Exact arithmetic verification. | exact | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | Use only supplied operands. | Check arithmetic operation. | Recompute if mismatch detected. | answerable | 1 | 0 | 1 | true | false | Stop after exact verification. | 7 | 69 | 24 | 7 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999364 | planning | planning_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Create a concise plan for solving a complex technical problem. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999364. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 8 | 70 | 25 | 8 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999365 | evidence_check | evidence_check_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Identify which claims require evidence before they can be asserted confidently. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999365. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 9 | 71 | 26 | 9 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999366 | consistency_check | consistency_check_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Check whether the supplied statements are mutually consistent. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999366. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 10 | 72 | 27 | 10 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999367 | adversarial | adversarial_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Identify a plausible failure mode in the proposed reasoning. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999367. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 11 | 73 | 28 | 11 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999368 | consistency_check | consistency_check_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Check whether the supplied statements are mutually consistent. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999368. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 12 | 74 | 29 | 12 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999369 | consistency_check | consistency_check_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Check whether the supplied statements are mutually consistent. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999369. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 13 | 75 | 30 | 0 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999370 | reasoning | comparison | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Compare two quantities and explain the comparison using only the provided values. | A = 63, B = 81 | B is greater than A by 18. | Compare values and compute difference. | Check comparison and difference. | exact | passed | passed | Use only supplied values. | Check comparison direction. | Recompute difference. | answerable | 1 | 0 | 2 | true | false | Stop after comparison verification. | 14 | 76 | 0 | 1 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||||||
mtd-000097999371 | prompt_review | prompt_review_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Review the prompt for ambiguity, contradictions, and missing constraints. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999371. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 15 | 77 | 1 | 2 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999372 | consistency_check | consistency_check_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Check whether the supplied statements are mutually consistent. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999372. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 16 | 78 | 2 | 3 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999373 | planning | planning_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Create a concise plan for solving a complex technical problem. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999373. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 0 | 79 | 3 | 4 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999374 | code | function_generation | programming | hard | hard | en | Write Python code that returns the square of an integer. | Input example: n = 81762 | def square(n):
return n * n | Identify required input/output and implement minimal function. | Static code contract check. | static_contract | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | No external API assumptions. | Check function signature and operation. | Correct implementation if contract is violated. | answerable | 0.99 | 0.01 | 1 | true | false | Stop after contract verification. | 1 | 80 | 4 | 5 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000097999375 | math | arithmetic | mathematics | very_hard | very_hard | en | Solve the following arithmetic problem exactly: 598058 + 148239 | 746297 | Identify operation, compute exactly, verify result. | Exact arithmetic verification. | exact | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | Use only supplied operands. | Check arithmetic operation. | Recompute if mismatch detected. | answerable | 1 | 0 | 1 | true | false | Stop after exact verification. | 2 | 81 | 5 | 6 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999376 | error_analysis | error_analysis_analysis | general_reasoning | very_hard | very_hard | en | Classify the likely cause of an incorrect answer and propose a repair. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999376. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 3 | 82 | 6 | 7 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999377 | ambiguity | ambiguity_analysis | general_reasoning | very_hard | very_hard | en | Identify ambiguity in the request and state what information is missing. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999377. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 4 | 83 | 7 | 8 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999378 | calibration | calibration_analysis | general_reasoning | very_hard | very_hard | en | Explain when a system should reduce confidence in its answer. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999378. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 5 | 84 | 8 | 9 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999379 | ambiguity | ambiguity_analysis | general_reasoning | very_hard | very_hard | en | Identify ambiguity in the request and state what information is missing. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999379. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 6 | 85 | 9 | 10 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999380 | generalization | generalization_analysis | general_reasoning | very_hard | very_hard | en | Explain how to test whether a model generalizes beyond familiar examples. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999380. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 7 | 86 | 10 | 11 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999381 | constraint_reasoning | constraint_reasoning_analysis | general_reasoning | very_hard | very_hard | en | Solve a problem while respecting multiple explicit constraints. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999381. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 8 | 87 | 11 | 12 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999382 | error_analysis | error_analysis_analysis | general_reasoning | very_hard | very_hard | en | Classify the likely cause of an incorrect answer and propose a repair. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999382. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 9 | 88 | 12 | 0 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999383 | ambiguity | ambiguity_analysis | general_reasoning | very_hard | very_hard | en | Identify ambiguity in the request and state what information is missing. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999383. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 10 | 89 | 13 | 1 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999384 | generalization | generalization_analysis | general_reasoning | very_hard | very_hard | en | Explain how to test whether a model generalizes beyond familiar examples. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999384. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 11 | 90 | 14 | 2 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999385 | fact_check | claim_verification | general_knowledge | very_hard | very_hard | en | Assess the claim and state whether it is correct. Do not invent evidence. | Water freezes at 0°C under standard atmospheric pressure. | Assessment: Correct.
A reliable fact-check should verify the claim against an appropriate authoritative source. | Parse claim, identify factual assertion, verify against reliable evidence. | External evidence should be checked for real-world factual claims. | evidence | required | required | Never fabricate a citation. | Identify unsupported factual certainty. | Qualify or verify the claim. | answerable | 0.85 | 0.15 | 3 | true | false | Stop after evidence requirement is identified. | 12 | 91 | 15 | 3 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||||||
mtd-000097999386 | ambiguity | ambiguity_analysis | general_reasoning | very_hard | very_hard | en | Identify ambiguity in the request and state what information is missing. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999386. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 13 | 92 | 16 | 4 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999387 | adversarial | adversarial_analysis | general_reasoning | very_hard | very_hard | en | Identify a plausible failure mode in the proposed reasoning. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999387. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 14 | 93 | 17 | 5 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999388 | reasoning | comparison | general_reasoning | very_hard | very_hard | en | Compare two quantities and explain the comparison using only the provided values. | A = 17, B = 36 | B is greater than A by 19. | Compare values and compute difference. | Check comparison and difference. | exact | passed | passed | Use only supplied values. | Check comparison direction. | Recompute difference. | answerable | 1 | 0 | 2 | true | false | Stop after comparison verification. | 15 | 94 | 18 | 6 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||||||
mtd-000097999389 | data_analysis | descriptive_statistics | statistics | very_hard | very_hard | en | Calculate the arithmetic mean of the supplied dataset. | Dataset: 58, 73, 77, 41, 39 | Mean = 57.6000 | Parse values, sum them, divide by count, verify. | Recompute sum and count. | exact | passed | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | Use only supplied dataset. | Check arithmetic and denominator. | Recompute statistic. | answerable | 1 | 0 | 2 | true | false | Stop after numerical verification. | 16 | 95 | 19 | 7 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000097999390 | consistency_check | consistency_check_analysis | general_reasoning | very_hard | very_hard | en | Check whether the supplied statements are mutually consistent. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999390. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 0 | 96 | 20 | 8 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999391 | calibration | calibration_analysis | general_reasoning | very_hard | very_hard | en | Explain when a system should reduce confidence in its answer. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999391. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 1 | 0 | 21 | 9 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999392 | self_correction | error_repair | mathematics | very_hard | very_hard | en | Identify and correct the numerical error in the proposed answer. | Problem: 70 + 47
Proposed answer: 118 | The proposed answer is incorrect. The correct answer is 117. | Recompute independently, compare with proposal, repair mismatch. | Independent recomputation. | exact | passed | Do not trust the proposed answer without verification. | passed | passed | answerable | 1 | 0 | 3 | true | false | Stop after independent correction. | 2 | 1 | 22 | 10 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||||||
mtd-000097999393 | generalization | generalization_analysis | general_reasoning | very_hard | very_hard | en | Explain how to test whether a model generalizes beyond familiar examples. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999393. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 3 | 2 | 23 | 11 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999394 | error_analysis | error_analysis_analysis | general_reasoning | very_hard | very_hard | en | Classify the likely cause of an incorrect answer and propose a repair. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999394. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 4 | 3 | 24 | 12 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999395 | generalization | generalization_analysis | general_reasoning | extreme | extreme | en | Explain how to test whether a model generalizes beyond familiar examples. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999395. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 5 | 4 | 25 | 0 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999396 | fact_check | claim_verification | general_knowledge | extreme | extreme | en | Assess the claim and state whether it is correct. Do not invent evidence. | Water freezes at 0°C under standard atmospheric pressure. | Assessment: Correct.
A reliable fact-check should verify the claim against an appropriate authoritative source. | Parse claim, identify factual assertion, verify against reliable evidence. | External evidence should be checked for real-world factual claims. | evidence | required | required | Never fabricate a citation. | Identify unsupported factual certainty. | Qualify or verify the claim. | answerable | 0.85 | 0.15 | 3 | true | false | Stop after evidence requirement is identified. | 6 | 5 | 26 | 1 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||||||
mtd-000097999397 | reasoning | comparison | general_reasoning | extreme | extreme | en | Compare two quantities and explain the comparison using only the provided values. | A = 42, B = 35 | A is greater than B by 7. | Compare values and compute difference. | Check comparison and difference. | exact | passed | passed | Use only supplied values. | Check comparison direction. | Recompute difference. | answerable | 1 | 0 | 2 | true | false | Stop after comparison verification. | 7 | 6 | 27 | 2 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||||||
mtd-000097999398 | data_analysis | descriptive_statistics | statistics | extreme | extreme | en | Calculate the arithmetic mean of the supplied dataset. | Dataset: 89, 50, 74, 39, 69 | Mean = 64.2000 | Parse values, sum them, divide by count, verify. | Recompute sum and count. | exact | passed | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | Use only supplied dataset. | Check arithmetic and denominator. | Recompute statistic. | answerable | 1 | 0 | 2 | true | false | Stop after numerical verification. | 8 | 7 | 28 | 3 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000097999399 | prompt_review | prompt_review_analysis | general_reasoning | extreme | extreme | en | Review the prompt for ambiguity, contradictions, and missing constraints. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999399. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 9 | 8 | 29 | 4 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.