id stringlengths 16 16 | task_family stringclasses 20
values | task_type stringclasses 20
values | domain stringclasses 14
values | difficulty stringclasses 5
values | difficulty_label stringclasses 5
values | language stringclasses 1
value | instruction stringlengths 54 90 | context stringlengths 0 82 | response stringlengths 1 330 | analysis_plan stringclasses 10
values | verification stringclasses 10
values | verification_type stringclasses 7
values | prompt_review stringclasses 2
values | prompt_alignment stringclasses 3
values | constraint_check stringclasses 3
values | consistency_check stringclasses 2
values | math_check stringclasses 3
values | logic_check stringclasses 3
values | counterexample_check stringclasses 2
values | data_analysis_check stringclasses 3
values | code_check stringclasses 3
values | evidence_check stringclasses 3
values | source_check stringclasses 3
values | hallucination_control stringclasses 10
values | error_detection stringclasses 10
values | error_repair stringclasses 10
values | answerability stringclasses 2
values | confidence float32 0.85 1 | uncertainty float32 0 0.15 | reasoning_depth int16 1 4 | minimal_sufficient_reasoning bool 1
class | unnecessary_reasoning bool 1
class | stop_condition stringclasses 10
values | surface_variation int32 0 16 | numeric_variation int32 0 96 | structure_variation int32 0 30 | ood_style int32 0 12 | quality_score float32 0.9 0.9 | synthetic bool 1
class | license stringclasses 1
value | generator_version stringclasses 1
value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
mtd-000097999100 | fact_check | claim_verification | general_knowledge | easy | easy | en | Assess the claim and state whether it is correct. Do not invent evidence. | A triangle has four sides. | Assessment: Incorrect.
A reliable fact-check should verify the claim against an appropriate authoritative source. | Parse claim, identify factual assertion, verify against reliable evidence. | External evidence should be checked for real-world factual claims. | evidence | required | required | Never fabricate a citation. | Identify unsupported factual certainty. | Qualify or verify the claim. | answerable | 0.85 | 0.15 | 3 | true | false | Stop after evidence requirement is identified. | 16 | 0 | 9 | 4 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||||||
mtd-000097999101 | data_analysis | descriptive_statistics | statistics | easy | easy | en | Calculate the arithmetic mean of the supplied dataset. | Dataset: 77, 22, 25, 37, 87 | Mean = 49.6000 | Parse values, sum them, divide by count, verify. | Recompute sum and count. | exact | passed | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | Use only supplied dataset. | Check arithmetic and denominator. | Recompute statistic. | answerable | 1 | 0 | 2 | true | false | Stop after numerical verification. | 0 | 1 | 10 | 5 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000097999102 | evidence_check | evidence_check_analysis | general_reasoning | easy | easy | en | Identify which claims require evidence before they can be asserted confidently. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999102. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 1 | 2 | 11 | 6 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999103 | planning | planning_analysis | general_reasoning | easy | easy | en | Create a concise plan for solving a complex technical problem. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999103. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 2 | 3 | 12 | 7 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999104 | self_correction | error_repair | mathematics | easy | easy | en | Identify and correct the numerical error in the proposed answer. | Problem: 77 + 27
Proposed answer: 109 | The proposed answer is incorrect. The correct answer is 104. | Recompute independently, compare with proposal, repair mismatch. | Independent recomputation. | exact | passed | Do not trust the proposed answer without verification. | passed | passed | answerable | 1 | 0 | 3 | true | false | Stop after independent correction. | 3 | 4 | 13 | 8 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||||||
mtd-000097999105 | ambiguity | ambiguity_analysis | general_reasoning | easy | easy | en | Identify ambiguity in the request and state what information is missing. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999105. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 4 | 5 | 14 | 9 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999106 | error_analysis | error_analysis_analysis | general_reasoning | easy | easy | en | Classify the likely cause of an incorrect answer and propose a repair. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999106. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 5 | 6 | 15 | 10 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999107 | code | function_generation | programming | easy | easy | en | Write Python code that returns the square of an integer. | Input example: n = 48411 | def square(n):
return n * n | Identify required input/output and implement minimal function. | Static code contract check. | static_contract | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | No external API assumptions. | Check function signature and operation. | Correct implementation if contract is violated. | answerable | 0.99 | 0.01 | 1 | true | false | Stop after contract verification. | 6 | 7 | 16 | 11 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000097999108 | adversarial | adversarial_analysis | general_reasoning | easy | easy | en | Identify a plausible failure mode in the proposed reasoning. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999108. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 7 | 8 | 17 | 12 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999109 | counterexample | counterexample_analysis | general_reasoning | easy | easy | en | Construct a counterexample that tests whether a general claim always holds. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999109. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 8 | 9 | 18 | 0 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999110 | instruction_following | format_constraint | general | medium | medium | en | Return the supplied number doubled. Return only the final number. | 6201 | 12402 | Identify transformation and output constraint. | Check transformation and requested format. | constraint | passed | passed | passed | No unsupported content. | answerable | 1 | 0 | 1 | true | false | Stop when requested format is satisfied. | 9 | 10 | 19 | 1 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||||||
mtd-000097999111 | planning | planning_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Create a concise plan for solving a complex technical problem. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999111. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 10 | 11 | 20 | 2 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999112 | ambiguity | ambiguity_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Identify ambiguity in the request and state what information is missing. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999112. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 11 | 12 | 21 | 3 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999113 | adversarial | adversarial_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Identify a plausible failure mode in the proposed reasoning. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999113. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 12 | 13 | 22 | 4 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999114 | code | function_generation | programming | medium | medium | en | Write Python code that returns the square of an integer. | Input example: n = 18732 | def square(n):
return n * n | Identify required input/output and implement minimal function. | Static code contract check. | static_contract | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | No external API assumptions. | Check function signature and operation. | Correct implementation if contract is violated. | answerable | 0.99 | 0.01 | 1 | true | false | Stop after contract verification. | 13 | 14 | 23 | 5 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000097999115 | research | research_methodology | materials science | medium | medium | en | Design a rigorous research procedure for investigating a question about materials science. | The procedure must distinguish evidence from assumptions and identify uncertainty. | 1. Define the research question precisely.
2. Identify measurable variables and hypotheses.
3. Select appropriate primary and secondary sources.
4. Record provenance for each important claim.
5. Compare independent evidence.
6. Identify uncertainty and alternative explanations.
7. Report conclusions separately from obs... | Define question, gather evidence, evaluate sources, quantify uncertainty. | Methodological consistency check. | methodological | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | required | required | Do not invent sources or findings. | Detect unsupported claims. | Remove or qualify unsupported claims. | answerable | 0.92 | 0.08 | 4 | true | false | Stop when methodology is complete and internally coherent. | 14 | 15 | 24 | 6 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000097999116 | calibration | calibration_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Explain when a system should reduce confidence in its answer. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999116. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 15 | 16 | 25 | 7 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999117 | evidence_check | evidence_check_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Identify which claims require evidence before they can be asserted confidently. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999117. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 16 | 17 | 26 | 8 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999118 | calibration | calibration_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Explain when a system should reduce confidence in its answer. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999118. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 0 | 18 | 27 | 9 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999119 | calibration | calibration_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Explain when a system should reduce confidence in its answer. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999119. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 1 | 19 | 28 | 10 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999120 | fact_check | claim_verification | general_knowledge | medium | medium | en | Assess the claim and state whether it is correct. Do not invent evidence. | All metals are liquid at room temperature. | Assessment: Incorrect.
A reliable fact-check should verify the claim against an appropriate authoritative source. | Parse claim, identify factual assertion, verify against reliable evidence. | External evidence should be checked for real-world factual claims. | evidence | required | required | Never fabricate a citation. | Identify unsupported factual certainty. | Qualify or verify the claim. | answerable | 0.85 | 0.15 | 3 | true | false | Stop after evidence requirement is identified. | 2 | 20 | 29 | 11 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||||||
mtd-000097999121 | ambiguity | ambiguity_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Identify ambiguity in the request and state what information is missing. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999121. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 3 | 21 | 30 | 12 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999122 | logic | deductive_reasoning | logic | medium | medium | en | Determine whether the conclusion follows from the given statements. | If x > 46, then x is positive.
x = 46.
y = 48. | Conclusion: x is positive.
Result: Yes. | Identify premises, apply implication, verify conclusion. | Logical consistency check. | symbolic | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | Reason only from supplied premises. | Check whether conclusion is entailed. | Re-evaluate premises if conclusion conflicts. | answerable | 0.99 | 0.01 | 2 | true | false | Stop once entailment is established. | 4 | 22 | 0 | 0 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000097999123 | adversarial | adversarial_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Identify a plausible failure mode in the proposed reasoning. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999123. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 5 | 23 | 1 | 1 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999124 | self_correction | error_repair | mathematics | medium | medium | en | Identify and correct the numerical error in the proposed answer. | Problem: 29 + 35
Proposed answer: 72 | The proposed answer is incorrect. The correct answer is 64. | Recompute independently, compare with proposal, repair mismatch. | Independent recomputation. | exact | passed | Do not trust the proposed answer without verification. | passed | passed | answerable | 1 | 0 | 3 | true | false | Stop after independent correction. | 6 | 24 | 2 | 2 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||||||
mtd-000097999125 | counterexample | counterexample_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Construct a counterexample that tests whether a general claim always holds. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999125. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 7 | 25 | 3 | 3 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999126 | prompt_review | prompt_review_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Review the prompt for ambiguity, contradictions, and missing constraints. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999126. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 8 | 26 | 4 | 4 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999127 | instruction_following | format_constraint | general | medium | medium | en | Return the supplied number doubled. Return only the final number. | 7102 | 14204 | Identify transformation and output constraint. | Check transformation and requested format. | constraint | passed | passed | passed | No unsupported content. | answerable | 1 | 0 | 1 | true | false | Stop when requested format is satisfied. | 9 | 27 | 5 | 5 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||||||
mtd-000097999128 | error_analysis | error_analysis_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Classify the likely cause of an incorrect answer and propose a repair. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999128. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 10 | 28 | 6 | 6 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999129 | consistency_check | consistency_check_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Check whether the supplied statements are mutually consistent. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999129. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 11 | 29 | 7 | 7 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999130 | logic | deductive_reasoning | logic | medium | medium | en | Determine whether the conclusion follows from the given statements. | If x > 12, then x is positive.
x = 12.
y = 15. | Conclusion: x is positive.
Result: Yes. | Identify premises, apply implication, verify conclusion. | Logical consistency check. | symbolic | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | Reason only from supplied premises. | Check whether conclusion is entailed. | Re-evaluate premises if conclusion conflicts. | answerable | 0.99 | 0.01 | 2 | true | false | Stop once entailment is established. | 12 | 30 | 8 | 8 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000097999131 | constraint_reasoning | constraint_reasoning_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Solve a problem while respecting multiple explicit constraints. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999131. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 13 | 31 | 9 | 9 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999132 | reasoning | comparison | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Compare two quantities and explain the comparison using only the provided values. | A = 66, B = 16 | A is greater than B by 50. | Compare values and compute difference. | Check comparison and difference. | exact | passed | passed | Use only supplied values. | Check comparison direction. | Recompute difference. | answerable | 1 | 0 | 2 | true | false | Stop after comparison verification. | 14 | 32 | 10 | 10 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||||||
mtd-000097999133 | adversarial | adversarial_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Identify a plausible failure mode in the proposed reasoning. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999133. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 15 | 33 | 11 | 11 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999134 | calibration | calibration_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Explain when a system should reduce confidence in its answer. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999134. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 16 | 34 | 12 | 12 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999135 | research | research_methodology | computer security | medium | medium | en | Design a rigorous research procedure for investigating a question about computer security. | The procedure must distinguish evidence from assumptions and identify uncertainty. | 1. Define the research question precisely.
2. Identify measurable variables and hypotheses.
3. Select appropriate primary and secondary sources.
4. Record provenance for each important claim.
5. Compare independent evidence.
6. Identify uncertainty and alternative explanations.
7. Report conclusions separately from obs... | Define question, gather evidence, evaluate sources, quantify uncertainty. | Methodological consistency check. | methodological | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | required | required | Do not invent sources or findings. | Detect unsupported claims. | Remove or qualify unsupported claims. | answerable | 0.92 | 0.08 | 4 | true | false | Stop when methodology is complete and internally coherent. | 0 | 35 | 13 | 0 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000097999136 | generalization | generalization_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Explain how to test whether a model generalizes beyond familiar examples. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999136. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 1 | 36 | 14 | 1 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999137 | generalization | generalization_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Explain how to test whether a model generalizes beyond familiar examples. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999137. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 2 | 37 | 15 | 2 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999138 | data_analysis | descriptive_statistics | statistics | medium | medium | en | Calculate the arithmetic mean of the supplied dataset. | Dataset: 7, 66, 20, 57, 54 | Mean = 40.8000 | Parse values, sum them, divide by count, verify. | Recompute sum and count. | exact | passed | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | Use only supplied dataset. | Check arithmetic and denominator. | Recompute statistic. | answerable | 1 | 0 | 2 | true | false | Stop after numerical verification. | 3 | 38 | 16 | 3 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000097999139 | code | function_generation | programming | medium | medium | en | Write Python code that returns the square of an integer. | Input example: n = 58773 | def square(n):
return n * n | Identify required input/output and implement minimal function. | Static code contract check. | static_contract | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | No external API assumptions. | Check function signature and operation. | Correct implementation if contract is violated. | answerable | 0.99 | 0.01 | 1 | true | false | Stop after contract verification. | 4 | 39 | 17 | 4 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000097999140 | research | research_methodology | machine learning | hard | hard | en | Design a rigorous research procedure for investigating a question about machine learning. | The procedure must distinguish evidence from assumptions and identify uncertainty. | 1. Define the research question precisely.
2. Identify measurable variables and hypotheses.
3. Select appropriate primary and secondary sources.
4. Record provenance for each important claim.
5. Compare independent evidence.
6. Identify uncertainty and alternative explanations.
7. Report conclusions separately from obs... | Define question, gather evidence, evaluate sources, quantify uncertainty. | Methodological consistency check. | methodological | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | required | required | Do not invent sources or findings. | Detect unsupported claims. | Remove or qualify unsupported claims. | answerable | 0.92 | 0.08 | 4 | true | false | Stop when methodology is complete and internally coherent. | 5 | 40 | 18 | 5 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000097999141 | evidence_check | evidence_check_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Identify which claims require evidence before they can be asserted confidently. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999141. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 6 | 41 | 19 | 6 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999142 | error_analysis | error_analysis_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Classify the likely cause of an incorrect answer and propose a repair. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999142. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 7 | 42 | 20 | 7 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999143 | error_analysis | error_analysis_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Classify the likely cause of an incorrect answer and propose a repair. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999143. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 8 | 43 | 21 | 8 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999144 | planning | planning_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Create a concise plan for solving a complex technical problem. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999144. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 9 | 44 | 22 | 9 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999145 | calibration | calibration_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Explain when a system should reduce confidence in its answer. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999145. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 10 | 45 | 23 | 10 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999146 | planning | planning_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Create a concise plan for solving a complex technical problem. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999146. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 11 | 46 | 24 | 11 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999147 | prompt_review | prompt_review_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Review the prompt for ambiguity, contradictions, and missing constraints. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999147. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 12 | 47 | 25 | 12 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999148 | planning | planning_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Create a concise plan for solving a complex technical problem. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999148. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 13 | 48 | 26 | 0 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999149 | adversarial | adversarial_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Identify a plausible failure mode in the proposed reasoning. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999149. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 14 | 49 | 27 | 1 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999150 | ambiguity | ambiguity_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Identify ambiguity in the request and state what information is missing. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999150. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 15 | 50 | 28 | 2 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999151 | evidence_check | evidence_check_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Identify which claims require evidence before they can be asserted confidently. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999151. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 16 | 51 | 29 | 3 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999152 | instruction_following | format_constraint | general | hard | hard | en | Return the supplied number doubled. Return only the final number. | 2501 | 5002 | Identify transformation and output constraint. | Check transformation and requested format. | constraint | passed | passed | passed | No unsupported content. | answerable | 1 | 0 | 1 | true | false | Stop when requested format is satisfied. | 0 | 52 | 30 | 4 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||||||
mtd-000097999153 | counterexample | counterexample_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Construct a counterexample that tests whether a general claim always holds. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999153. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 1 | 53 | 0 | 5 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999154 | self_correction | error_repair | mathematics | hard | hard | en | Identify and correct the numerical error in the proposed answer. | Problem: 69 + 14
Proposed answer: 91 | The proposed answer is incorrect. The correct answer is 83. | Recompute independently, compare with proposal, repair mismatch. | Independent recomputation. | exact | passed | Do not trust the proposed answer without verification. | passed | passed | answerable | 1 | 0 | 3 | true | false | Stop after independent correction. | 2 | 54 | 1 | 6 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||||||
mtd-000097999155 | logic | deductive_reasoning | logic | hard | hard | en | Determine whether the conclusion follows from the given statements. | If x > 52, then x is positive.
x = 52.
y = 74. | Conclusion: x is positive.
Result: Yes. | Identify premises, apply implication, verify conclusion. | Logical consistency check. | symbolic | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | Reason only from supplied premises. | Check whether conclusion is entailed. | Re-evaluate premises if conclusion conflicts. | answerable | 0.99 | 0.01 | 2 | true | false | Stop once entailment is established. | 3 | 55 | 2 | 7 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000097999156 | error_analysis | error_analysis_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Classify the likely cause of an incorrect answer and propose a repair. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999156. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 4 | 56 | 3 | 8 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999157 | research | research_methodology | astronomy | hard | hard | en | Design a rigorous research procedure for investigating a question about astronomy. | The procedure must distinguish evidence from assumptions and identify uncertainty. | 1. Define the research question precisely.
2. Identify measurable variables and hypotheses.
3. Select appropriate primary and secondary sources.
4. Record provenance for each important claim.
5. Compare independent evidence.
6. Identify uncertainty and alternative explanations.
7. Report conclusions separately from obs... | Define question, gather evidence, evaluate sources, quantify uncertainty. | Methodological consistency check. | methodological | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | required | required | Do not invent sources or findings. | Detect unsupported claims. | Remove or qualify unsupported claims. | answerable | 0.92 | 0.08 | 4 | true | false | Stop when methodology is complete and internally coherent. | 5 | 57 | 4 | 9 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000097999158 | ambiguity | ambiguity_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Identify ambiguity in the request and state what information is missing. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999158. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 6 | 58 | 5 | 10 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999159 | self_correction | error_repair | mathematics | hard | hard | en | Identify and correct the numerical error in the proposed answer. | Problem: 24 + 88
Proposed answer: 118 | The proposed answer is incorrect. The correct answer is 112. | Recompute independently, compare with proposal, repair mismatch. | Independent recomputation. | exact | passed | Do not trust the proposed answer without verification. | passed | passed | answerable | 1 | 0 | 3 | true | false | Stop after independent correction. | 7 | 59 | 6 | 11 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||||||
mtd-000097999160 | generalization | generalization_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Explain how to test whether a model generalizes beyond familiar examples. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999160. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 8 | 60 | 7 | 12 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999161 | data_analysis | descriptive_statistics | statistics | hard | hard | en | Calculate the arithmetic mean of the supplied dataset. | Dataset: 80, 21, 58, 12, 65 | Mean = 47.2000 | Parse values, sum them, divide by count, verify. | Recompute sum and count. | exact | passed | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | Use only supplied dataset. | Check arithmetic and denominator. | Recompute statistic. | answerable | 1 | 0 | 2 | true | false | Stop after numerical verification. | 9 | 61 | 8 | 0 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000097999162 | consistency_check | consistency_check_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Check whether the supplied statements are mutually consistent. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999162. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 10 | 62 | 9 | 1 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999163 | generalization | generalization_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Explain how to test whether a model generalizes beyond familiar examples. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999163. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 11 | 63 | 10 | 2 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999164 | adversarial | adversarial_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Identify a plausible failure mode in the proposed reasoning. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999164. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 12 | 64 | 11 | 3 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999165 | generalization | generalization_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Explain how to test whether a model generalizes beyond familiar examples. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999165. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 13 | 65 | 12 | 4 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999166 | data_analysis | descriptive_statistics | statistics | hard | hard | en | Calculate the arithmetic mean of the supplied dataset. | Dataset: 17, 60, 26, 2, 29 | Mean = 26.8000 | Parse values, sum them, divide by count, verify. | Recompute sum and count. | exact | passed | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | Use only supplied dataset. | Check arithmetic and denominator. | Recompute statistic. | answerable | 1 | 0 | 2 | true | false | Stop after numerical verification. | 14 | 66 | 13 | 5 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000097999167 | prompt_review | prompt_review_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Review the prompt for ambiguity, contradictions, and missing constraints. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999167. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 15 | 67 | 14 | 6 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999168 | research | research_methodology | economics | hard | hard | en | Design a rigorous research procedure for investigating a question about economics. | The procedure must distinguish evidence from assumptions and identify uncertainty. | 1. Define the research question precisely.
2. Identify measurable variables and hypotheses.
3. Select appropriate primary and secondary sources.
4. Record provenance for each important claim.
5. Compare independent evidence.
6. Identify uncertainty and alternative explanations.
7. Report conclusions separately from obs... | Define question, gather evidence, evaluate sources, quantify uncertainty. | Methodological consistency check. | methodological | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | required | required | Do not invent sources or findings. | Detect unsupported claims. | Remove or qualify unsupported claims. | answerable | 0.92 | 0.08 | 4 | true | false | Stop when methodology is complete and internally coherent. | 16 | 68 | 15 | 7 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000097999169 | research | research_methodology | economics | hard | hard | en | Design a rigorous research procedure for investigating a question about economics. | The procedure must distinguish evidence from assumptions and identify uncertainty. | 1. Define the research question precisely.
2. Identify measurable variables and hypotheses.
3. Select appropriate primary and secondary sources.
4. Record provenance for each important claim.
5. Compare independent evidence.
6. Identify uncertainty and alternative explanations.
7. Report conclusions separately from obs... | Define question, gather evidence, evaluate sources, quantify uncertainty. | Methodological consistency check. | methodological | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | required | required | Do not invent sources or findings. | Detect unsupported claims. | Remove or qualify unsupported claims. | answerable | 0.92 | 0.08 | 4 | true | false | Stop when methodology is complete and internally coherent. | 0 | 69 | 16 | 8 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000097999170 | reasoning | comparison | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Compare two quantities and explain the comparison using only the provided values. | A = 48, B = 56 | B is greater than A by 8. | Compare values and compute difference. | Check comparison and difference. | exact | passed | passed | Use only supplied values. | Check comparison direction. | Recompute difference. | answerable | 1 | 0 | 2 | true | false | Stop after comparison verification. | 1 | 70 | 17 | 9 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||||||
mtd-000097999171 | data_analysis | descriptive_statistics | statistics | hard | hard | en | Calculate the arithmetic mean of the supplied dataset. | Dataset: 87, 82, 2, 87, 80 | Mean = 67.6000 | Parse values, sum them, divide by count, verify. | Recompute sum and count. | exact | passed | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | Use only supplied dataset. | Check arithmetic and denominator. | Recompute statistic. | answerable | 1 | 0 | 2 | true | false | Stop after numerical verification. | 2 | 71 | 18 | 10 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000097999172 | reasoning | comparison | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Compare two quantities and explain the comparison using only the provided values. | A = 74, B = 1 | A is greater than B by 73. | Compare values and compute difference. | Check comparison and difference. | exact | passed | passed | Use only supplied values. | Check comparison direction. | Recompute difference. | answerable | 1 | 0 | 2 | true | false | Stop after comparison verification. | 3 | 72 | 19 | 11 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||||||
mtd-000097999173 | instruction_following | format_constraint | general | hard | hard | en | Return the supplied number doubled. Return only the final number. | 4838 | 9676 | Identify transformation and output constraint. | Check transformation and requested format. | constraint | passed | passed | passed | No unsupported content. | answerable | 1 | 0 | 1 | true | false | Stop when requested format is satisfied. | 4 | 73 | 20 | 12 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||||||
mtd-000097999174 | error_analysis | error_analysis_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Classify the likely cause of an incorrect answer and propose a repair. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999174. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 5 | 74 | 21 | 0 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999175 | self_correction | error_repair | mathematics | very_hard | very_hard | en | Identify and correct the numerical error in the proposed answer. | Problem: 50 + 82
Proposed answer: 134 | The proposed answer is incorrect. The correct answer is 132. | Recompute independently, compare with proposal, repair mismatch. | Independent recomputation. | exact | passed | Do not trust the proposed answer without verification. | passed | passed | answerable | 1 | 0 | 3 | true | false | Stop after independent correction. | 6 | 75 | 22 | 1 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||||||
mtd-000097999176 | counterexample | counterexample_analysis | general_reasoning | very_hard | very_hard | en | Construct a counterexample that tests whether a general claim always holds. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999176. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 7 | 76 | 23 | 2 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999177 | evidence_check | evidence_check_analysis | general_reasoning | very_hard | very_hard | en | Identify which claims require evidence before they can be asserted confidently. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999177. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 8 | 77 | 24 | 3 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999178 | constraint_reasoning | constraint_reasoning_analysis | general_reasoning | very_hard | very_hard | en | Solve a problem while respecting multiple explicit constraints. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999178. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 9 | 78 | 25 | 4 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999179 | instruction_following | format_constraint | general | very_hard | very_hard | en | Return the supplied number doubled. Return only the final number. | 492 | 984 | Identify transformation and output constraint. | Check transformation and requested format. | constraint | passed | passed | passed | No unsupported content. | answerable | 1 | 0 | 1 | true | false | Stop when requested format is satisfied. | 10 | 79 | 26 | 5 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||||||
mtd-000097999180 | calibration | calibration_analysis | general_reasoning | very_hard | very_hard | en | Explain when a system should reduce confidence in its answer. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999180. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 11 | 80 | 27 | 6 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999181 | research | research_methodology | materials science | very_hard | very_hard | en | Design a rigorous research procedure for investigating a question about materials science. | The procedure must distinguish evidence from assumptions and identify uncertainty. | 1. Define the research question precisely.
2. Identify measurable variables and hypotheses.
3. Select appropriate primary and secondary sources.
4. Record provenance for each important claim.
5. Compare independent evidence.
6. Identify uncertainty and alternative explanations.
7. Report conclusions separately from obs... | Define question, gather evidence, evaluate sources, quantify uncertainty. | Methodological consistency check. | methodological | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | required | required | Do not invent sources or findings. | Detect unsupported claims. | Remove or qualify unsupported claims. | answerable | 0.92 | 0.08 | 4 | true | false | Stop when methodology is complete and internally coherent. | 12 | 81 | 28 | 7 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000097999182 | generalization | generalization_analysis | general_reasoning | very_hard | very_hard | en | Explain how to test whether a model generalizes beyond familiar examples. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999182. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 13 | 82 | 29 | 8 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999183 | adversarial | adversarial_analysis | general_reasoning | very_hard | very_hard | en | Identify a plausible failure mode in the proposed reasoning. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999183. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 14 | 83 | 30 | 9 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999184 | self_correction | error_repair | mathematics | very_hard | very_hard | en | Identify and correct the numerical error in the proposed answer. | Problem: 46 + 64
Proposed answer: 114 | The proposed answer is incorrect. The correct answer is 110. | Recompute independently, compare with proposal, repair mismatch. | Independent recomputation. | exact | passed | Do not trust the proposed answer without verification. | passed | passed | answerable | 1 | 0 | 3 | true | false | Stop after independent correction. | 15 | 84 | 0 | 10 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||||||
mtd-000097999185 | logic | deductive_reasoning | logic | very_hard | very_hard | en | Determine whether the conclusion follows from the given statements. | If x > 57, then x is positive.
x = 57.
y = 61. | Conclusion: x is positive.
Result: Yes. | Identify premises, apply implication, verify conclusion. | Logical consistency check. | symbolic | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | Reason only from supplied premises. | Check whether conclusion is entailed. | Re-evaluate premises if conclusion conflicts. | answerable | 0.99 | 0.01 | 2 | true | false | Stop once entailment is established. | 16 | 85 | 1 | 11 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000097999186 | math | arithmetic | mathematics | very_hard | very_hard | en | Solve the following arithmetic problem exactly: 1081536 ÷ 172 | 1081536 | Identify operation, compute exactly, verify result. | Exact arithmetic verification. | exact | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | Use only supplied operands. | Check arithmetic operation. | Recompute if mismatch detected. | answerable | 1 | 0 | 1 | true | false | Stop after exact verification. | 0 | 86 | 2 | 12 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999187 | adversarial | adversarial_analysis | general_reasoning | very_hard | very_hard | en | Identify a plausible failure mode in the proposed reasoning. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999187. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 1 | 87 | 3 | 0 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999188 | self_correction | error_repair | mathematics | very_hard | very_hard | en | Identify and correct the numerical error in the proposed answer. | Problem: 46 + 86
Proposed answer: 140 | The proposed answer is incorrect. The correct answer is 132. | Recompute independently, compare with proposal, repair mismatch. | Independent recomputation. | exact | passed | Do not trust the proposed answer without verification. | passed | passed | answerable | 1 | 0 | 3 | true | false | Stop after independent correction. | 2 | 88 | 4 | 1 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||||||
mtd-000097999189 | math | arithmetic | mathematics | very_hard | very_hard | en | Solve the following arithmetic problem exactly: 389 × 83 | 32287 | Identify operation, compute exactly, verify result. | Exact arithmetic verification. | exact | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | Use only supplied operands. | Check arithmetic operation. | Recompute if mismatch detected. | answerable | 1 | 0 | 1 | true | false | Stop after exact verification. | 3 | 89 | 5 | 2 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999190 | adversarial | adversarial_analysis | general_reasoning | very_hard | very_hard | en | Identify a plausible failure mode in the proposed reasoning. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999190. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 4 | 90 | 6 | 3 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999191 | constraint_reasoning | constraint_reasoning_analysis | general_reasoning | very_hard | very_hard | en | Solve a problem while respecting multiple explicit constraints. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999191. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 5 | 91 | 7 | 4 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999192 | consistency_check | consistency_check_analysis | general_reasoning | very_hard | very_hard | en | Check whether the supplied statements are mutually consistent. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999192. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 6 | 92 | 8 | 5 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999193 | calibration | calibration_analysis | general_reasoning | very_hard | very_hard | en | Explain when a system should reduce confidence in its answer. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999193. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 7 | 93 | 9 | 6 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999194 | instruction_following | format_constraint | general | very_hard | very_hard | en | Return the supplied number doubled. Return only the final number. | 5581 | 11162 | Identify transformation and output constraint. | Check transformation and requested format. | constraint | passed | passed | passed | No unsupported content. | answerable | 1 | 0 | 1 | true | false | Stop when requested format is satisfied. | 8 | 94 | 10 | 7 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||||||
mtd-000097999195 | counterexample | counterexample_analysis | general_reasoning | extreme | extreme | en | Construct a counterexample that tests whether a general claim always holds. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999195. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 9 | 95 | 11 | 8 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999196 | calibration | calibration_analysis | general_reasoning | extreme | extreme | en | Explain when a system should reduce confidence in its answer. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999196. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 10 | 96 | 12 | 9 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999197 | evidence_check | evidence_check_analysis | general_reasoning | extreme | extreme | en | Identify which claims require evidence before they can be asserted confidently. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999197. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 11 | 0 | 13 | 10 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999198 | generalization | generalization_analysis | general_reasoning | extreme | extreme | en | Explain how to test whether a model generalizes beyond familiar examples. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999198. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 12 | 1 | 14 | 11 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000097999199 | ambiguity | ambiguity_analysis | general_reasoning | extreme | extreme | en | Identify ambiguity in the request and state what information is missing. | Synthetic evaluation instance 97999199. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 13 | 2 | 15 | 12 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.