archived
stringclasses
2 values
author
stringlengths
3
20
author_fullname
stringlengths
4
12
body
stringlengths
0
22.5k
comment_type
stringclasses
1 value
controversiality
stringclasses
2 values
created_utc
stringlengths
10
10
edited
stringlengths
4
12
gilded
stringclasses
7 values
id
stringlengths
1
7
link_id
stringlengths
7
10
locked
stringclasses
2 values
name
stringlengths
4
10
parent_id
stringlengths
5
10
permalink
stringlengths
41
91
retrieved_on
stringlengths
10
10
score
stringlengths
1
4
subreddit_id
stringclasses
1 value
subreddit_name_prefixed
stringclasses
1 value
subreddit_type
stringclasses
1 value
total_awards_received
stringclasses
19 values
False
cyrusol
t2_bkmvv
> I just can't _get_ C++, or Rust Not with that attitude, yes. I am convinced you would make it otherwise.
null
0
1546083184
False
0
ecsqk1b
t3_aac4hg
null
null
t1_ecs1a2f
/r/programming/comments/aac4hg/modern_c_lamentations/ecsqk1b/
1548220653
5
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
warlord85
t2_re5cp
Hahahaha I still remember doing this in secondary high school, not inspired by Doom (not directly maybe) but to test Pascal graphics. That was 20 years ago! Those were the days!! Thanks OP!!!
null
0
1546083335
False
0
ecsqmtg
t3_aajb7r
null
null
t3_aajb7r
/r/programming/comments/aajb7r/how_doom_fire_was_done/ecsqmtg/
1548220688
5
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
omni-viral
t2_3chm4v
[relevant xkcd](https://xkcd.com/927/)
null
0
1546083580
False
0
ecsqrgn
t3_aac4hg
null
null
t1_ecshv7w
/r/programming/comments/aac4hg/modern_c_lamentations/ecsqrgn/
1548220745
-1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
Ameisen
t2_5qad2
Are you trying to be intentionally inflammatory?
null
0
1546083592
False
0
ecsqroh
t3_aac4hg
null
null
t1_ecspekx
/r/programming/comments/aac4hg/modern_c_lamentations/ecsqroh/
1548220748
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
MasterCwizo
t2_mninb
I found this book a couple of days ago and immediately wanted to buy it. Then I saw he wrote one for Wolfenstein too (first), so I bought that one first. This one is on the todo list. Def looks like a good read.
null
0
1546083739
False
0
ecsqubg
t3_aajb7r
null
null
t1_ecsooqd
/r/programming/comments/aajb7r/how_doom_fire_was_done/ecsqubg/
1548220810
6
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
WhiteCastleHo
t2_bwheg
I feel like printers are notoriously annoying within the IT world. I was told in one of my programming classes, just as an aside, that printers are the hardest things to fix. My father worked as an IT rockstar for a major corporation and they would sometimes have him travel several hours to a different branch just to fix a printer. I feel like outsiders view this as a trivial task when it's actually a major pain in the ass.
null
0
1546083753
False
0
ecsqul7
t3_aaco1d
null
null
t1_ecs794i
/r/programming/comments/aaco1d/things_i_dont_know_as_of_2018/ecsqul7/
1548220813
2
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
omni-viral
t2_3chm4v
`std::function` adds significant overhead.
null
0
1546083877
False
0
ecsqwuy
t3_aac4hg
null
null
t1_ecs10nj
/r/programming/comments/aac4hg/modern_c_lamentations/ecsqwuy/
1548220841
8
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
sdfrew
t2_5nc8y
Not having used Haskell for anything except toy programs myself, I wonder if there is anything you gain from error handling, IO, ... using that common type formalism (monads)? I mean, its neat that they all follow the monad laws, but are there any practical consequences of that compared to, say, having all of those use their own distinct composition functions?
null
0
1546083942
False
0
ecsqy4s
t3_aai5ap
null
null
t1_ecsqh1d
/r/programming/comments/aai5ap/what_is_a_monad_computerphile/ecsqy4s/
1548220856
4
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
omni-viral
t2_3chm4v
I'm almost sure that in `auto value = 32;` `value` will have `int` type. And this won't compile because type inference in C++ is garbage. void foo(long*) {} int main() { auto x = 32; foo(&x); // Error. `&x` has type `int*` } It never looks how variable declared with `auto` is used. Type of the initialization expression is used always. And if there is ambiguity in expression (function returning template parameter) then it won't compile even if variable usage disambiguate the type.
null
0
1546084184
1546084596
0
ecsr2mz
t3_aac4hg
null
null
t1_ecrys89
/r/programming/comments/aac4hg/modern_c_lamentations/ecsr2mz/
1548220912
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
dhruvrajvanshi
t2_kji30
I think you slightly missed the point. You should be able to make a similar list for yourself. Things that you don't know but want to.
null
0
1546084186
False
0
ecsr2ol
t3_aaco1d
null
null
t1_ecsngb6
/r/programming/comments/aaco1d/things_i_dont_know_as_of_2018/ecsr2ol/
1548220912
2
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
bdtddt
t2_x8et0
I think algorithms is one of the few areas where learning as you need them is a terrible way of doing things. For every instance where you think ‘there must be an efficient algorithm for this’, there’ll be plenty more where you’ve just implemented an ad hoc solution because the perfect algorithmic solution was completely unknown to you.
null
0
1546084195
False
0
ecsr2v3
t3_aaco1d
null
null
t1_ecsg8zo
/r/programming/comments/aaco1d/things_i_dont_know_as_of_2018/ecsr2v3/
1548220915
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
bdtddt
t2_x8et0
In 99% of cases it will be tests, it’s rather obvious who is instead a type driven development practitioner.
null
0
1546084242
False
0
ecsr3rs
t3_aaco1d
null
null
t1_ecsogou
/r/programming/comments/aaco1d/things_i_dont_know_as_of_2018/ecsr3rs/
1548220926
3
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
crinkleberry
t2_8f5ej
I've seen a few articles about the techniques for animation, memory management, etc. they used in old games like DOOM and quake. I love them, can anybody recommend a place to see more?
null
0
1546084461
False
0
ecsr7xc
t3_aajb7r
null
null
t3_aajb7r
/r/programming/comments/aajb7r/how_doom_fire_was_done/ecsr7xc/
1548220977
29
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
bdtddt
t2_x8et0
People who use the “I’ll just look it up” line are to my ear admitting to having a lacklustre knowledge of existing solutions and thus poor sense of pattern recognition. For every instance when they think to google something, there’ll be a dozen where they just throw together their own poor ad hoc solution.
null
0
1546084493
False
0
ecsr8k1
t3_aaco1d
null
null
t1_ecsh8ac
/r/programming/comments/aaco1d/things_i_dont_know_as_of_2018/ecsr8k1/
1548220985
-5
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
WhiteCastleHo
t2_bwheg
> I don’t know Flexbox or Grid. Floats are my jam. I saw that you indicated this on twitter a little while ago. At least learn Flexbox, man. You won't regret it.
null
0
1546084537
False
0
ecsr9dx
t3_aaco1d
null
null
t3_aaco1d
/r/programming/comments/aaco1d/things_i_dont_know_as_of_2018/ecsr9dx/
1548220995
5
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
xcdesz
t2_79zii
Not sure about the number 2 point. For me at least, my mind is pretty jumbled when I am coding, and it sort of clarifies as I get closer to the solution. I'll change my mind at least 5 times as I write something down. Whiteboarding kinda sucks for me... Although if you give me five minutes alone in a closet I'll have a very pretty thing you can read and I can discuss.
null
0
1546084564
False
0
ecsr9ww
t3_aaco1d
null
null
t1_ecrljiw
/r/programming/comments/aaco1d/things_i_dont_know_as_of_2018/ecsr9ww/
1548221002
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
wellmeaningtroll
t2_9526cir
Alright, so now it's fine to create "content" by taking random people's tweets and pouring a bit of your own sauce on top. What a freakin waste.
null
0
1546084597
False
0
ecsrajn
t3_aakiko
null
null
t3_aakiko
/r/programming/comments/aakiko/on_guishaming_and_a_mountain_of_hot_takes/ecsrajn/
1548221009
6
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
kucukkanat
t2_lpc11
Why did I get downvotes for my comment?
null
0
1546084632
False
0
ecsrb7p
t3_a9yxp6
null
null
t3_a9yxp6
/r/programming/comments/a9yxp6/gitbatch_manage_all_of_your_git_repositories_in/ecsrb7p/
1548221018
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
OctagonClock
t2_govx9
I don't understand the absolute hatred of exceptions everyone suddenly developed around 2016.
null
0
1546084662
False
0
ecsrbs3
t3_aa3qdm
null
null
t1_ecqpb7y
/r/programming/comments/aa3qdm/please_do_not_attempt_to_simplify_this_code_keep/ecsrbs3/
1548221025
3
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
YM_Industries
t2_70ork
Is the fire meant to look [like this](https://i.imgur.com/KRSlhZ8.png)? This looks pretty different to the Doom effect. Tried in both Chrome 71.0.3578.98 (64-bit) and Firefox Developer Edition 65.0b7 (64-bit).
null
0
1546084690
False
0
ecsrcap
t3_aajb7r
null
null
t1_ecsk2su
/r/programming/comments/aajb7r/how_doom_fire_was_done/ecsrcap/
1548221031
85
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
fagnerbrack
t2_xeaqp
I google the problem and most of the time I can find the algorithm. I TDD the problem to make sure I can understand all the details of it, not to find the most optional solution. I'm not saying I can rediscover an algorithm ppl took years to discover, that would be insane!
null
0
1546084735
False
0
ecsrd6l
t3_aaco1d
null
null
t1_ecsr2v3
/r/programming/comments/aaco1d/things_i_dont_know_as_of_2018/ecsrd6l/
1548221042
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
takinashi
t2_ah3sr
I think they get mad because of the language.
null
0
1546085425
False
0
ecsrqil
t3_a9yxp6
null
null
t1_ecsrb7p
/r/programming/comments/a9yxp6/gitbatch_manage_all_of_your_git_repositories_in/ecsrqil/
1548221207
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
ProfessorPhi
t2_84c4z
High level languages use for in constructs, only in manual slicing does it matter. I don't like 1 indexing, but it's rarely as bad as it's made out, especially for higher level languages
null
0
1546085547
False
0
ecsrsvw
t3_aabai1
null
null
t1_ecqsgm7
/r/programming/comments/aabai1/fish_shell_30/ecsrsvw/
1548221237
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
stone_henge
t2_hw9z1
There's nothing intrinsically correct about driving on the right side of the road either. People that are used to drive on the right side still have a hard time adjusting to driving on the left side in the few places where that's mandatory.
null
0
1546085558
False
0
ecsrt3q
t3_aabai1
null
null
t1_ecs09fy
/r/programming/comments/aabai1/fish_shell_30/ecsrt3q/
1548221240
4
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
ProfessorPhi
t2_84c4z
Install fzf and never look back
null
0
1546085584
False
0
ecsrtm5
t3_aabai1
null
null
t1_ecsamjl
/r/programming/comments/aabai1/fish_shell_30/ecsrtm5/
1548221245
3
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
kucukkanat
t2_lpc11
yeah I could guess. It's amazing how people gets triggered just because of language nowadays. Too lazy to right click and translate. Racists..
null
0
1546085767
False
0
ecsrxal
t3_a9yxp6
null
null
t1_ecsrqil
/r/programming/comments/a9yxp6/gitbatch_manage_all_of_your_git_repositories_in/ecsrxal/
1548221291
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
indiebryan
t2_123uxh
Man #3 sounds like a dream as a freelancer, maybe I should dust off the old resume.
null
0
1546085831
False
0
ecsryji
t3_aaco1d
null
null
t1_ecsc9o9
/r/programming/comments/aaco1d/things_i_dont_know_as_of_2018/ecsryji/
1548221306
2
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
stone_henge
t2_hw9z1
Why should I write this stream I/O heavy script that I'll use exactly once in a language that'll make that much more cumbersome than just piping things together? Right tool for the right job.
null
0
1546085849
False
0
ecsryvv
t3_aabai1
null
null
t1_ecr9t0y
/r/programming/comments/aabai1/fish_shell_30/ecsryvv/
1548221311
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
Pepf
t2_91a4c
(ノಠ益ಠ)ノ彡┻━┻
null
0
1546085885
False
0
ecsrzlw
t3_aaco1d
null
null
t1_ecskc5g
/r/programming/comments/aaco1d/things_i_dont_know_as_of_2018/ecsrzlw/
1548221319
4
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
kankyo
t2_77w4q
I heard of someone doing alt+space to write _. Seems like it would be great if one could rely on it existing by default.
null
0
1546085939
False
0
ecss0rj
t3_aaamfb
null
null
t1_ecqbbl0
/r/programming/comments/aaamfb/how_you_ever_thought_about_which_casing/ecss0rj/
1548221334
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
kankyo
t2_77w4q
Well that's a lie. Code bases in nim aren't forced to be a total mess of mixing camelCase, snake_case, and PascalCase just because you use libs with different conventions. For nim this is more likely because of the great C integration so there are fewer wrappers than in for example Python. I don't say I agree with nims crazy approach but let's not lie about it ok?
null
0
1546086145
False
0
ecss4z9
t3_aaamfb
null
null
t1_ecrlcp8
/r/programming/comments/aaamfb/how_you_ever_thought_about_which_casing/ecss4z9/
1548221416
0
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
sabas123
t2_by3ez
>I'd rather be told I'm an idiot than to be just ignored. By combinatorylogic maybe, but I would feel nothing of value is lost if shevegen never replied to my comments ever again.
null
0
1546086238
False
0
ecss70r
t3_aaco1d
null
null
t1_ecsfwvf
/r/programming/comments/aaco1d/things_i_dont_know_as_of_2018/ecss70r/
1548221440
3
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
welkam
t2_o4k0x
A modern language that can be used instead of C++ does exist today. Its called D. Dont need to wait
null
0
1546086321
False
0
ecss8pc
t3_aac4hg
null
null
t1_ecshv7w
/r/programming/comments/aac4hg/modern_c_lamentations/ecss8pc/
1548221461
6
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
JezusTheCarpenter
t2_q0loq
Absolutely, actually just by knowing what you don't know you are already in a good place.
null
0
1546086455
False
0
ecssbq9
t3_aaco1d
null
null
t1_ecsagnp
/r/programming/comments/aaco1d/things_i_dont_know_as_of_2018/ecssbq9/
1548221498
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
JezusTheCarpenter
t2_q0loq
> whole "DevOps" umbrella covers what used to be multiple job titles and backgrounds +1
null
0
1546086513
False
0
ecssd0h
t3_aaco1d
null
null
t1_ecs6jhj
/r/programming/comments/aaco1d/things_i_dont_know_as_of_2018/ecssd0h/
1548221514
2
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
sabas123
t2_by3ez
Keep in mind that it is much harder for an employee to learn algorithms on the job compared to something that is likely to be closer to the day to day work.
null
0
1546086624
False
0
ecssfh7
t3_aaco1d
null
null
t1_ecso2vh
/r/programming/comments/aaco1d/things_i_dont_know_as_of_2018/ecssfh7/
1548221545
3
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
dagbrown
t2_358pm
> I'm really glad I had prior experience making games and building the engine up from scratch That's what university computer science programs are all about. Not making engines from scratch; making the *standard library* from scratch. Once you understand what's in the standard library, you can use it that much more effectively. So once you've built your own game engine from scratch, you appreciate much better what's in a pre-made game engine.
null
0
1546086685
1546089058
0
ecssgud
t3_aajb7r
null
null
t1_ecspsad
/r/programming/comments/aajb7r/how_doom_fire_was_done/ecssgud/
1548221561
16
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
ToastOfTheTown911
t2_2qsews83
Ooh boy. Who gives a sh**.
null
0
1546086808
False
0
ecssjjn
t3_aakiko
null
null
t3_aakiko
/r/programming/comments/aakiko/on_guishaming_and_a_mountain_of_hot_takes/ecssjjn/
1548221594
7
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
MEaster
t2_45thc
> (If anything I'd say having a "primitive casting" keyword still makes it more of a special case than it should be; I prefer the OCaml style where the conversions are just ordinary functions). The `From` trait is implemented for the conversions between the number types where the target can fit the entire range of the source type (e.g. u8 > i16), and the conversion can never fail. I think the Clippy tool suggests using these instead of `as` to avoid accidental truncation or such if you later change the types. There's also `TryFrom` for cases where the target might not fit the entire range (e.g. i16 > u8) and could fail, though it also has a blanket implementation for all implementations of `From`. But that trait's not currently stable (you know if there's an ETA on that /u/steveklabnik1 ?).
null
0
1546087061
False
0
ecssp5e
t3_a9zyp3
null
null
t1_ecrsx6x
/r/programming/comments/a9zyp3/thoughts_on_rust_in_2019/ecssp5e/
1548221665
2
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
sabas123
t2_by3ez
What school did you go to that you can pass a compilers class with just looking at your phone?
null
0
1546087116
False
0
ecssqdp
t3_aaco1d
null
null
t1_ecsfbjf
/r/programming/comments/aaco1d/things_i_dont_know_as_of_2018/ecssqdp/
1548221680
3
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
astro_za
t2_4ejl2v
This is interesting, thank you. For those wanting to start with game programming, should one look at OpenGL, OpenTK or [SFML.NET](https://SFML.NET), which of these would you recommend to beginners (who have coding experience)?
null
0
1546087253
False
0
ecsst82
t3_aajb7r
null
null
t1_ecsopcl
/r/programming/comments/aajb7r/how_doom_fire_was_done/ecsst82/
1548221715
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
matthieum
t2_5ij2c
> Regardless, it's just not a reason for a blind kneejerk reaction to a language. That's just wilful ignorance. Indeed; it's certainly possible to adapt, and catch issues with tests. I would just encourage authors of new languages to avoid 1-based indexing because it's one more (small) barrier to their language adoption and usage.
null
0
1546087305
False
0
ecssudr
t3_aabai1
null
null
t1_ecrqakg
/r/programming/comments/aabai1/fish_shell_30/ecssudr/
1548221729
3
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
sketch_56
t2_w65be
Good read, but one thing I got hung up on, is that there's an inconsistency in referencing the fire pixel array >In the code, lower-left is at array index zero But the code still references index 0 at upper left. Otherwise, array updates would overwrite the bottom line of white pixels. Just being nitpicky
null
0
1546087461
False
0
ecssy0m
t3_aajb7r
null
null
t3_aajb7r
/r/programming/comments/aajb7r/how_doom_fire_was_done/ecssy0m/
1548221774
8
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
pelrun
t2_4rooo
Yup.
null
0
1546087491
False
0
ecssyo1
t3_aajb7r
null
null
t1_ecspbsl
/r/programming/comments/aajb7r/how_doom_fire_was_done/ecssyo1/
1548221782
0
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
matthieum
t2_5ij2c
Always thought the second was different; maybe you should clear your cache?
null
0
1546087517
False
0
ecssz8x
t3_aabai1
null
null
t1_ecr9w46
/r/programming/comments/aabai1/fish_shell_30/ecssz8x/
1548221789
3
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
ygra
t2_8kizi
This should probably be integrated into whatever typing aids are offered by one's IDE / text editor, so you can practice what you really have to type. As it is, it's helpful for people writing code in Notepad, but for most of the things you don't have to type more than a few letters before hitting Tab to auto-complete to the correct word that's usually even matched to be contextually-relevant.
null
0
1546087575
False
0
ecst0eh
t3_aakbja
null
null
t3_aakbja
/r/programming/comments/aakbja/code_typing_tutor_write_code_quickly_without/ecst0eh/
1548221803
3
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
matthieum
t2_5ij2c
> If you want you can add a meta method for the _ENV table that makes indexs normal. I'm very scared now. The idea of mixing libraries written in 0-based and 1-based indexing together seems like a recipe for bugs; I'd rather have language-wise consistency, whether 0 or 1.
null
0
1546087646
False
0
ecst1xq
t3_aabai1
null
null
t1_ecr74q7
/r/programming/comments/aabai1/fish_shell_30/ecst1xq/
1548221822
2
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
schlupa
t2_4nalh3
That was ann old 32bits windows optlink limit. Nothing to do with D as a language.
null
0
1546087767
False
0
ecst4lk
t3_aac4hg
null
null
t1_ecsc9zp
/r/programming/comments/aac4hg/modern_c_lamentations/ecst4lk/
1548221855
8
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
airflow_matt
t2_meh1h
I have similar experience. Our old project got quite out of hand. The new one is about 250kloc c++ code and 220kloc c code (without dependencies) and the debug build takes about 70 seconds on my 4 core laptop, which is quite pleasant to work with. Keeping it there does require lot of discipline, being rather frugal with templates, lots of forward declaration and generally keeping header files very small and concise. Which unfortunately seems to be the exact opposite trend of anything "modern c++" related. And it's not like there are no templates or metaprogramming in the project - simple search for "template <" within the codebase returned 658 results, but they are mostly small, not nested and used with restraint.
null
0
1546087859
False
0
ecst6mz
t3_aac4hg
null
null
t1_ecsor3n
/r/programming/comments/aac4hg/modern_c_lamentations/ecst6mz/
1548221880
7
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
sabas123
t2_by3ez
What topics do you consider to fall under the basics of networking?
null
0
1546087872
False
0
ecst6ww
t3_aaco1d
null
null
t1_ecsccei
/r/programming/comments/aaco1d/things_i_dont_know_as_of_2018/ecst6ww/
1548221883
3
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
haqbar
t2_4v49j
Not sure how technical or if this is a bit to "new" for you, but the blog posts detailing the making of Crash Bandicoot is an excellent read about the whole game dev process: https://all-things-andy-gavin.com/2011/02/02/making-crash-bandicoot-part-1/
null
0
1546087881
False
0
ecst74z
t3_aajb7r
null
null
t1_ecsr7xc
/r/programming/comments/aajb7r/how_doom_fire_was_done/ecst74z/
1548221886
20
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
[deleted]
None
[deleted]
null
0
1546088008
False
0
ecsta1c
t3_aajb7r
null
null
t1_ecsk2su
/r/programming/comments/aajb7r/how_doom_fire_was_done/ecsta1c/
1548221922
-1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
lulzmachine
t2_3c0uk
That's really cool
null
0
1546088082
False
0
ecstbud
t3_aabai1
null
null
t1_ecra4sk
/r/programming/comments/aabai1/fish_shell_30/ecstbud/
1548221944
6
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
gabeheadman
t2_541hc
Do you work in a startup environment? An older corporate one? If we're real though, there's a lot of industry that needs a much slower, less volatile course. If ERP systems switched up tech every few years, nothing would ever get produced. SF is such a loud microcosm in the tech world that it seems like everyone should be switching it up like they do, but the reality is that doesn't always work.
null
0
1546088245
False
0
ecstfhx
t3_aaco1d
null
null
t1_ecs78be
/r/programming/comments/aaco1d/things_i_dont_know_as_of_2018/ecstfhx/
1548222019
4
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
joonazan
t2_kh84p
There is also Rust and Haskell.
null
0
1546088266
False
0
ecstg09
t3_aac4hg
null
null
t1_ecss8pc
/r/programming/comments/aac4hg/modern_c_lamentations/ecstg09/
1548222025
6
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
the_gnarts
t2_9ya05
> From this except, the book sounds incredible It is. A real page turner. If you can imagine parts of the game in your head (as anyone who lived through the 90s would), it will explain how every single pixel ends up being drawn, from the hardware primitives to the 3D geometry and sprites.
null
0
1546088453
False
0
ecstkqn
t3_aajb7r
null
null
t1_ecsooqd
/r/programming/comments/aajb7r/how_doom_fire_was_done/ecstkqn/
1548222084
6
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
kaeblo
t2_iw9bc
Good question. If I understand it correctly you are asking what's the point of following the terminology of monads for all the different implementations compared to something like, say JS Promise.then, which works similarly. I'm not sure if I can answer this very well, but I'll try. With monads you have no flatten and flatten version of mapping and you can consistently expect what these functions do. With other words the type signatures are regular. I wouldn't mind it too much having similarly working functions with different names, if someone can find more expressive names than map and flatMap (not hard to beat >>= I guess) Now I'm used to using these functions I don't think about this problem anymore, but when I started learning it, it was definitely somewhat confusing to find the connection between the different maps and flatmaps. The other downside is when you use multiple different monads very close to each other it can be hard to tell which one is which, when you only see the lot of maps. The other advantage what you gain with consistently using these type signatures and names is being able to use for comprehension / do notation. I'm not sure if there could be another way for the compiler to allow for this. Why the monads laws are important though I can't answer. Scala's Try and Future break one law (because of exceptions) and they seem to be working pretty well in practice.
null
0
1546088550
False
0
ecstn67
t3_aai5ap
null
null
t1_ecsqy4s
/r/programming/comments/aai5ap/what_is_a_monad_computerphile/ecstn67/
1548222113
2
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
joonazan
t2_kh84p
Usually pure functions are maintainable because their dependencies are explicit. Your code is useless if given a pure function.
null
0
1546088561
False
0
ecstngn
t3_aac4hg
null
null
t1_ecqzdk3
/r/programming/comments/aac4hg/modern_c_lamentations/ecstngn/
1548222117
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
GHansard
t2_328pa
I blame my faulty memory. Thank you for correcting me.
null
0
1546088634
False
0
ecstp99
t3_aabai1
null
null
t1_ecsgvpu
/r/programming/comments/aabai1/fish_shell_30/ecstp99/
1548222139
2
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
qzrt
t2_175xbf
> For too long the people who drive C++ development have completely ignored debug and compile times Kind of hard for the C++ committee to enforce things like compiler optimizations. They create a spec they don't control the actual implementation of it. For example Microsoft's std::cout is completely garbage. The way they implemented it causes massive slow downs if you output using it. It's much faster to just use printf. It probably will never be fixed either. Making code fast with no optimization enabled is difficult. If you do that you effective need to remove any sort of abstraction, I remember implementing matrix multiplication, I can write code that uses pre-existing functions for vectors. But if I do that, the debug build will be extremely slow, as it don't optimize out the function calls. To make it faster without optimization I effectively need to write out every addition and multiplication in place. You can write fast code without optimization but you will be throwing out effectively everything else out the windows. Wish modules made it into C++17, now it's going to be another stretch of time before it gets added. Might help mitigate the compile time situation a bit but in general C++ is just always going to be slow to compile.
null
0
1546089413
False
0
ecsu8xm
t3_aac4hg
null
null
t1_ecrwgep
/r/programming/comments/aac4hg/modern_c_lamentations/ecsu8xm/
1548222383
8
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
tso
t2_37rbd
When you can rely on every damned clock cycle to be at your beck and call, magic happens. These days one have so many layers of redirection that it is downright scary.
null
0
1546089878
False
0
ecsulri
t3_aajb7r
null
null
t1_ecsnbh4
/r/programming/comments/aajb7r/how_doom_fire_was_done/ecsulri/
1548222541
58
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
InsanityRoach
t2_8ziyv
The real question is, why are they so unreliable?
null
0
1546089881
1546090152
0
ecsulur
t3_aaco1d
null
null
t1_ecsqul7
/r/programming/comments/aaco1d/things_i_dont_know_as_of_2018/ecsulur/
1548222542
2
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
mu_mu_lambda
t2_5y4r6
Kleisli arrows are just a generalisation of function composition for monads though. Apples aren’t a thing, we’re eating Granny Smiths now. Is that what you’re trying to say?
null
0
1546089966
False
0
ecsuo6w
t3_aai5ap
null
null
t1_ecse9qc
/r/programming/comments/aai5ap/what_is_a_monad_computerphile/ecsuo6w/
1548222571
7
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
mihaus_
t2_l9v5vmu
Seems like it's a similar concept but with blur, no?
null
0
1546090020
False
0
ecsupnl
t3_aajb7r
null
null
t1_ecsrcap
/r/programming/comments/aajb7r/how_doom_fire_was_done/ecsupnl/
1548222619
6
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
kulakovanton
t2_tirem
Thank you for your response.
null
0
1546090048
False
0
ecsuqcv
t3_aakbja
null
null
t1_ecst0eh
/r/programming/comments/aakbja/code_typing_tutor_write_code_quickly_without/ecsuqcv/
1548222627
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
steveklabnik1
t2_d7udf
It's been stuck in a tricky situation, but it seems like there's light at the end of the tunnel! Hopefully pretty soon.
null
0
1546090163
False
0
ecsutfm
t3_a9zyp3
null
null
t1_ecssp5e
/r/programming/comments/a9zyp3/thoughts_on_rust_in_2019/ecsutfm/
1548222665
2
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
stone_henge
t2_hw9z1
".." is a literal hard link that is created for every directory that points to the parent directory, of which there only is of course only one. It seems consistent from that point of view that it should be treated as any other file and `ln -s somewhere/whatever symlink ; cd symlink ; cd ..` should resolve to `somewhere` which is the parent directory of the directory pointed at by `symlink`. However, in UNIX, what is actually "correct" is mandated by POSIX, and POSIX, not necessarily consistent, mandates that the `cd` command should resolve `..` *logically* unless the `-P` option is specified. If the `-P` option is specified, it should however resolve symbolic links before attempting to change the directory and reset `PWD`, just as you prefer. So what `cd argument` actually does when the `-P` flag is not specified is to take the current `PWD`, append the argument to it and then symbolically resolve every `..` component and make sure that the resulting path resolves to a directory, call `chdir` with that path and also reset `PWD` to that path. That is, if the result of the concatenation is `a/b/c/../d`, it mangles the string into `a/b/d` without any regard for what `c` is or where it physically resides, and that'll be your new `PWD` and as such the basis for any further `cd` invocation. It's literally just mangling the string without any regard for what anything represents physically. So you're now seeing Fish improving its POSIX compliance. If you prefer that symlinks are resolved, use the -P option. EDIT: Here's the spec: https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/utilities/cd.html. To whomever downvoted me, feel free to shoot the messenger, but UNIX (like most other operating systems) just isn't very consistent, and any appeal to correctness should refer to the applicable standards rather than consistency. If you want a POSIX compliant command environment, this is how your `ls` implementation has to work. If you don't want that, but instead want your `cd` behave differently from that of every other shell and ignore the standards, by all means do that, but don't argue for it on the basis that it's the "correct" way to do it.
null
0
1546090251
1546096316
0
ecsuvuw
t3_aabai1
null
null
t1_ecskj9f
/r/programming/comments/aabai1/fish_shell_30/ecsuvuw/
1548222695
2
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
Matthew94
t2_6jzsd
> /u/combinatorylogic I have him RES tagged as "dickhead" because he's the most bitter and unbearable cunt that I've seen on this site.
null
0
1546090310
False
0
ecsuxgr
t3_aaco1d
null
null
t1_ecr5rwx
/r/programming/comments/aaco1d/things_i_dont_know_as_of_2018/ecsuxgr/
1548222716
5
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
MEaster
t2_45thc
Well, now I'm intrigued as to what kind of tricky situation could occur for what on the surface seems like a simple API. Time to go digging! Thanks.
null
0
1546090392
False
0
ecsuzpj
t3_a9zyp3
null
null
t1_ecsutfm
/r/programming/comments/a9zyp3/thoughts_on_rust_in_2019/ecsuzpj/
1548222743
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
steveklabnik1
t2_d7udf
> It's always nice to have a more in-depth explanation but this sounds like something where I could dive deeper myself (although links, hints where to look etc. always welcome:-) "const evaluation" and "MIRI" are the two big things. > I think what is not clear to me here is why e.g. foo<a_len: i32>(a: [f64; a_len]) would not provide sufficient information to the compiler. The question isn't purely one of sufficiency, it's one of simplicity. As you say > would expect that this kind of context-independence allows for much more robust design and reasoning about compiler behaviour and combination of language features. However, you're missing some other benefits: tooling is easier to write, for example. But the key reason is keeping the grammar simpler, as far as I know.
null
0
1546090481
False
0
ecsv290
t3_a9zyp3
null
null
t1_ecsp07f
/r/programming/comments/a9zyp3/thoughts_on_rust_in_2019/ecsv290/
1548222775
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
editor_of_the_beast
t2_6ab1b
Really it’s HTML that makes that divide. Everything boils down to generating HTML for the browser so it influences everything. I would count document.createElement as being influenced by HTML as well, even though it’s not actually markup. Basically if you’re not using canvas, the DOM is everywhere. Mobile is based on an actual programming language, so regular software engineering practices can be applied. Javascript didn’t even have modules until like 3 years ago. JS was always meant to adorn markup, not build a program by itself. The web is a system that is influenced by the operation of the browser (obviously). But it leaks everywhere. The general trend is moving back towards “traditional” software, with the rise of the JS frameworks. These all move more power towards the software side of things, vs the markup. Basically the web really is a newer operating system that has grown beyond the intention of linking between text documents, so it makes sense that it seems weird compared to native software which has been in pretty much the same form since 1970.
null
0
1546090550
False
0
ecsv48y
t3_aaco1d
null
null
t1_ecsmxnj
/r/programming/comments/aaco1d/things_i_dont_know_as_of_2018/ecsv48y/
1548222799
5
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
welkam
t2_o4k0x
D takes idea of templates from God level and gives it to us mere mortals. Now everyone can use them
null
0
1546090590
False
0
ecsv5eg
t3_aac4hg
null
null
t1_ecrcsch
/r/programming/comments/aac4hg/modern_c_lamentations/ecsv5eg/
1548222814
7
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
editor_of_the_beast
t2_6ab1b
Cool.
null
0
1546090636
False
0
ecsv6o6
t3_aaco1d
null
null
t1_ecschu2
/r/programming/comments/aaco1d/things_i_dont_know_as_of_2018/ecsv6o6/
1548222829
0
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
Sedbict
t2_670l7m
Yep, I started a C++ maths library as a pet project to eventually use in demos or other projects and the amount of effort it goes into simple stuff such as cycle-efficient matrix multiplication is insane. For all their advantages, most of the widely available tools really keep us from seeing the whole picture (the amount of developers who can't get low-level ideas is embarrassingly high).
null
0
1546090725
False
0
ecsv95a
t3_aajb7r
null
null
t1_ecsnbh4
/r/programming/comments/aajb7r/how_doom_fire_was_done/ecsv95a/
1548222859
22
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
CornedBee
t2_10lnt6
> Every 'if' statement has a matching 'else' (exception: simple error checks for a client API call) Third function in the module: if !utilfeature.DefaultFeatureGate.Enabled(features.VolumeScheduling) { return false, nil } That's not an error check. That's a feature gate. The function contains three more non-error unmatched if-returns. Don't you love it when comments are lying?
null
0
1546090945
False
0
ecsvfph
t3_aa3qdm
null
null
t3_aa3qdm
/r/programming/comments/aa3qdm/please_do_not_attempt_to_simplify_this_code_keep/ecsvfph/
1548222941
3
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
editor_of_the_beast
t2_6ab1b
It’s important because you don’t realize you need it until you encounter a problem that would actually benefit from knowing CS theory. And if you’ve never applied CS theory to a problem, you can’t know how powerful it is. If you look at the people who built the foundational technology that we use everyday, there’s CS everywhere. A file system is a tree. The internet is a graph. If we don’t at least know of the theory that sits within these tools, we can’t make any advancements. That’s not necessarily a bad thing - it just puts a divide between the type of programmers there are. There are the ones more like construction workers, that can use the existing tools and build things according to existing practices, and then there are the programmers that can solve problems that don’t have a solution yet. That’s more science-y. I still would argue that even a basic understanding of data structures and algorithms will improve your daily job, even if you’re just plugging away at building some UI for a feature that has to go out. I’m not saying the industry’s obsession with testing that stuff out in interviews is good, but the idea of knowing this stuff doesn’t bother me at all. I think it’s helpful.
null
0
1546091115
False
0
ecsvkhs
t3_aaco1d
null
null
t1_ecs5llh
/r/programming/comments/aaco1d/things_i_dont_know_as_of_2018/ecsvkhs/
1548223000
10
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
Adverpol
t2_k7xhv
With cleaner you mean slightly less eye-bleed inducing.
null
0
1546091197
False
0
ecsvmvb
t3_aabai1
null
null
t1_ecrb5qi
/r/programming/comments/aabai1/fish_shell_30/ecsvmvb/
1548223030
3
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
editor_of_the_beast
t2_6ab1b
Humans are bad at explaining things, and programmers are the worst of all of the humans at explaining things.
null
0
1546091270
False
0
ecsvox2
t3_aaco1d
null
null
t1_ecrz2yw
/r/programming/comments/aaco1d/things_i_dont_know_as_of_2018/ecsvox2/
1548223055
2
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
steveklabnik1
t2_d7udf
The issue was with its interaction with `!`, the "never type". It has to be stabilized too, because the blanket impls of `TryFrom` for it need to land at the same time it lands. There were some questions about the coercions of `!` that held *it* up from stabilizing, which held `TryFrom` up too.
null
0
1546091309
False
0
ecsvq0m
t3_a9zyp3
null
null
t1_ecsuzpj
/r/programming/comments/a9zyp3/thoughts_on_rust_in_2019/ecsvq0m/
1548223068
2
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
editor_of_the_beast
t2_6ab1b
Mentions Facebook on StackOverflow... Gets hired by Facebook... Love it.
null
0
1546091340
False
0
ecsvqxg
t3_aaco1d
null
null
t1_ecrisyr
/r/programming/comments/aaco1d/things_i_dont_know_as_of_2018/ecsvqxg/
1548223080
6
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
steveklabnik1
t2_d7udf
> I thought "what went down" meant there was some big drama over it. That is what your parent was saying; a lot of people didn't like it, so there was drama.
null
0
1546091343
False
0
ecsvqzm
t3_a9zyp3
null
null
t1_ecs2qdo
/r/programming/comments/a9zyp3/thoughts_on_rust_in_2019/ecsvqzm/
1548223081
2
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
editor_of_the_beast
t2_6ab1b
Yea specialization is one of the only ways to be truly great at something. Source, am not great at anything and am interested in literally everything. I know a small degree about pretty much everything he mentioned. Just enough to embarrass myself on an interview testing any of these things.
null
0
1546091422
False
0
ecsvt9t
t3_aaco1d
null
null
t1_ecs7z7q
/r/programming/comments/aaco1d/things_i_dont_know_as_of_2018/ecsvt9t/
1548223108
10
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
editor_of_the_beast
t2_6ab1b
You hit the nail on the head. There are definitely people who have only used a dynamically typed language and think static typing is “old and stupid.” I don’t have a dog in the fight but I’ve most certainly used both, extensively. Typescript was extremely easy to pick up because of knowing about static types.
null
0
1546091523
False
0
ecsvw1v
t3_aaco1d
null
null
t1_ecrsgqk
/r/programming/comments/aaco1d/things_i_dont_know_as_of_2018/ecsvw1v/
1548223143
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
__j_random_hacker
t2_4rnnt
I wasn't arguing that people shouldn't learn how to use lambdas specifically, I was arguing that a tradeoff *exists*. The post I replied to seemed not to understand/acknowledge that this tradeoff even exists. I would personally put lambdas in the "worth it" category -- it's a small amount of new syntax that enables some very handy things. > If someone can't learn lambdas, because then he couldn't get anything done It's not like learning this one new thing would solve everything. Each version of C++ brings a multitude of new features, and learning *all* of them *would* stop a lot of people from getting a lot of things done. > It's never a got choice to stick to archaic standards because of decreased productivity. Of course it depends on what exactly you mean by "archaic", but in any case I would not say "never".
null
0
1546091638
False
0
ecsvzko
t3_aac4hg
null
null
t1_ecs5ecb
/r/programming/comments/aac4hg/modern_c_lamentations/ecsvzko/
1548223214
3
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
mapplemobs
t2_164dj3
Something like this should stay off /programming and should be put on /webdev, because HTML isn't actually programming.
null
0
1546091766
False
0
ecsw3i5
t3_aal3qo
null
null
t3_aal3qo
/r/programming/comments/aal3qo/basic_html_codes_and_tags_for_beginners_tutorial/ecsw3i5/
1548223262
7
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
welkam
t2_o4k0x
When talking about compile times and run times you should put compile flags with your numbers. DMD doesnt do lots of inlining and optimizations so some code can run >10x slower in debug mode than LDC or GDC
null
0
1546092090
False
0
ecswcv1
t3_aac4hg
null
null
t1_ecrfn7f
/r/programming/comments/aac4hg/modern_c_lamentations/ecswcv1/
1548223378
6
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
sammymammy2
t2_xoqzw
Without having read the article: AI has been vital in many fields that we now do not consider to be AI
null
0
1546092178
False
0
ecswfei
t3_aafep8
null
null
t1_ecrmw01
/r/programming/comments/aafep8/a_history_of_artificial_intelligence/ecswfei/
1548223410
3
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
steveklabnik1
t2_d7udf
Promises are *almost* monads, but are not monads. I believe the epicenter of this discussion was https://github.com/promises-aplus/promises-spec/issues/94, but there was a *lot* of discourse about this.
null
0
1546092491
False
0
ecswocv
t3_aai5ap
null
null
t1_ecsg7wz
/r/programming/comments/aai5ap/what_is_a_monad_computerphile/ecswocv/
1548223520
20
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
Groundbreaking_Lion
t2_10l76bxa
Now implement it in a FPGA
null
0
1546092700
False
0
ecswue8
t3_aajb7r
null
null
t3_aajb7r
/r/programming/comments/aajb7r/how_doom_fire_was_done/ecswue8/
1548223595
13
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
fecal_brunch
t2_5dg8s
I disagree with your general sentiment. I think you should start with whatever you would find most engaging. If you see programming as a means to an end, then learn to code with unity. I've seen it done by artists learning what they need to make a game. It's a simple approachable environment that takes a lot of friction away. There's a huge community and plenty of assets you can use to make a game. Nothing against cellular automata!
null
0
1546092883
False
0
ecsx01c
t3_aajb7r
null
null
t1_ecsopcl
/r/programming/comments/aajb7r/how_doom_fire_was_done/ecsx01c/
1548223665
53
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
welkam
t2_o4k0x
WekaIO is \~280 KLOC and debug build is 3-4 min so it seems that D could be used for big projects [https://youtu.be/RVpaNM-f69s?t=2212](https://youtu.be/RVpaNM-f69s?t=2212)
null
0
1546093018
False
0
ecsx4av
t3_aac4hg
null
null
t1_ecsc9zp
/r/programming/comments/aac4hg/modern_c_lamentations/ecsx4av/
1548223717
4
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
TheRedManFromRussia
t2_ryvp7
Just imagine that this guy works on reactjs. Jesus
null
0
1546093089
False
0
ecsx6kx
t3_aaco1d
null
null
t3_aaco1d
/r/programming/comments/aaco1d/things_i_dont_know_as_of_2018/ecsx6kx/
1548223744
-10
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
tasminima
t2_q2mvk9r
I know every little bit of what you wrote, so I'm sorry that I won't apologize for my lack of receptivity to your "teaching"; I'm however sorry that you feel so strongly about the apparent evilness of function pointers. As for where I expect to learn things in depth, I shall note that my opinion is that looking at generated code and knowing the microarchitecture of modern processors is a better way to do that than random commentaries on reddit. My point is that call through function pointers can be "inlined" in the same situations that other techniques allow such things to happen, but in other cases they can still be used fully dynamically, in which case *of course* there is no way to inline. Now I'm not even advocating for their indiscriminate use or stating that they are superior to more "modern" style; but they are not to be forgotten either, depending on your needs. So there is nothing that intrinsically inhibit inlining because of the "nature" of function pointers (especially given the exploitation of UB by modern compilers) at least not more than when you don't have them. You can only inline when you know both bodies, and when you can reduce the set of possible callees to best case one, or in degraded cases a small set of discriminable likely cases (the discriminant can be the pointer value itself, thanks to various points of the standard) plus maybe a fallback using the dreaded indirect call. But in cases where you pass a lambda to a template, it is not really that much difficult to optimize the equivalent where you would pass one pointer to a template, if what really matter is respected. See? It is the availability of the bodies and the "nearly finite" set of possible callees that allows for inlining. Of course it is possible to do inlining with a template and a lambda, because in this case *you have no other choice* (than to have the bodies available and a single callee)
null
0
1546093362
1546093685
0
ecsxf3y
t3_aac4hg
null
null
t1_ecs2ers
/r/programming/comments/aac4hg/modern_c_lamentations/ecsxf3y/
1548223880
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
dpash
t2_5bdkm
You have to remember to check it. You can't ignore a `Maybe`.
null
0
1546093469
False
0
ecsxiby
t3_aai5ap
null
null
t1_ecsm6hx
/r/programming/comments/aai5ap/what_is_a_monad_computerphile/ecsxiby/
1548223920
15
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
steveklabnik1
t2_d7udf
This isn't really accurate, IMHO. Rust has a lot of Modern C++'s features, but the language is built around them, rather than having it be additive. This means a lot of defaults can be flipped, for example, move is the default in Rust, but copy is the default in C++. The end result is cleaner, but you have to pay in lack of backwards compatibility.
null
0
1546093489
False
0
ecsxixn
t3_aac4hg
null
null
t1_ecs0hk0
/r/programming/comments/aac4hg/modern_c_lamentations/ecsxixn/
1548223928
8
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
steveklabnik1
t2_d7udf
You might also like the generator version, similar to the C++ coroutines version https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18781113
null
0
1546093657
False
0
ecsxo0x
t3_aac4hg
null
null
t1_ecsejdm
/r/programming/comments/aac4hg/modern_c_lamentations/ecsxo0x/
1548223991
3
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
DJRBuckingham
t2_ywqtq
Thank you for the numbers, this is what is needed to make the case that there is another way. They put into perspective the 45m compile times for UE4 across 12 cores, or 30m across hundreds of cores via Incredibuild, all for roughly 2 million lines of code compared to your 500k. When one style of programming nets a compile speed of ~60 lines per second per core and the other nets ~1800, that is noteworthy and points to the former doing something very *very* wrong. I would be interested to hear how your compile times fare with a dumb single-TU unity build, master.cpp #including everything type affair. I have anecdotal evidence that it speeds things up a surprising amount, even being single threaded and such, purely due to the lack of parsing header files over and over. It removes the ability to incrementally build, but if your rebuild time is a matter of seconds, it may end up still being a win. It is what I use, but I don't have a 500k codebase to try it on, so if you feel the need to create more work for yourself I'd appreciate knowing the result!
null
0
1546093744
False
0
ecsxqmv
t3_aac4hg
null
null
t1_ecst6mz
/r/programming/comments/aac4hg/modern_c_lamentations/ecsxqmv/
1548224022
2
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
GenerateRandName
t2_gyk76ps
I have allways found monads really complicated when looking at the theory but easy when using irl. It is the opposite of a segfault.
null
0
1546093865
False
0
ecsxub3
t3_aai5ap
null
null
t3_aai5ap
/r/programming/comments/aai5ap/what_is_a_monad_computerphile/ecsxub3/
1548224068
18
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
KitchenAstronomer
t2_20u00b26
In other words people are stupidly retarded. The same people will be bashing Windows/OtherOS because they cant be bothered to go out of their comfort zone and their favorite switch/cmd is not there.
null
0
1546093888
False
0
ecsxuxr
t3_aakiko
null
null
t3_aakiko
/r/programming/comments/aakiko/on_guishaming_and_a_mountain_of_hot_takes/ecsxuxr/
1548224075
-2
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
nfrankel
t2_ayl6m
Or at least in /r/learnprogramming
null
0
1546093921
False
0
ecsxvxp
t3_aal3qo
null
null
t1_ecsw3i5
/r/programming/comments/aal3qo/basic_html_codes_and_tags_for_beginners_tutorial/ecsxvxp/
1548224088
3
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null