EXOKERN ContactBench v0 — Peg Insertion with Force/Torque
The first publicly available insertion dataset with calibrated 6-axis force/torque annotations.
Part of the ContactBench collection by EXOKERN — The Data Engine for Physical AI
Why This Dataset Exists
Over 95% of existing robotics manipulation datasets contain no force/torque data. Yet contact-rich tasks — insertion, threading, snap-fit assembly — fundamentally depend on haptic feedback for reliable execution. Vision alone cannot distinguish a jammed peg from a seated one.
This dataset provides 2,221 peg-in-hole insertion episodes with full 6-axis wrench data at every timestep, generated using the FORGE (Force-Guided Exploration) framework in NVIDIA Isaac Lab. Every frame captures what the robot feels, not just what it sees.
Dataset Overview
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Episodes | 2,221 |
| Total Frames | 330,929 |
| Avg Episode Length | ~149 steps |
| Control Frequency | 20 Hz |
| Format | LeRobot v3.0 (Parquet) |
| Robot | Franka Emika Panda (7-DOF) |
| Simulator | NVIDIA Isaac Lab 2.3.x + PhysX GPU |
| Task | Isaac-Forge-PegInsert-Direct-v0 |
| Size | ~75 MB |
| License | CC-BY-NC 4.0 |
Features
Each frame contains the following tensors:
| Feature | Shape | Description |
|---|---|---|
observation.state |
(24,) |
Flattened observation vector — see State Tensor Semantics below |
observation.wrench |
(6,) |
6-axis force/torque: [Fx, Fy, Fz, Mx, My, Mz] — see Wrench Specification |
action |
(7,) |
Delta end-effector pose command [dx, dy, dz, dRx, dRy, dRz] + success prediction |
timestamp |
scalar | Wall-clock time within episode (s) |
frame_index |
int | Frame position within episode |
episode_index |
int | Episode identifier |
State Tensor Semantics
The observation.state tensor is a flat 24-element vector produced by FORGE's collapse_obs_dict(). It concatenates the following quantities in order:
| Index | Field | Dims | Unit | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0–2 | fingertip_pos |
3 | m | End-effector (fingertip) position in world frame |
| 3–5 | fingertip_pos_rel_fixed |
3 | m | EE position relative to the socket (fixed part) |
| 6–9 | fingertip_quat |
4 | — | EE orientation as quaternion [w, x, y, z] |
| 10–12 | ee_linvel |
3 | m/s | End-effector linear velocity |
| 13–15 | ee_angvel |
3 | rad/s | End-effector angular velocity |
| 16–21 | force_sensor_smooth |
6 | N, N·m | Smoothed 6-axis wrench (same data as observation.wrench) |
| 22 | force_threshold |
1 | N | Maximum allowable contact force (FORGE parameter) |
| 23 | ema_factor |
1 | — | Exponential moving average smoothing coefficient |
Implementation reference: These fields correspond to
OBS_DIM_CFGinfactory_env_cfg.py(indices 0–15) extended by the FORGE force-sensing additions (indices 16–23). See Noseworthy et al., 2024 §III for details.
Wrench Specification
| Property | Value |
|---|---|
| Coordinate frame | End-effector body frame (Franka panda_hand link) |
| Convention | [Fx, Fy, Fz, Mx, My, Mz] |
| Force unit | Newtons (N) |
| Torque unit | Newton-meters (N·m) |
| Source | env.unwrapped.force_sensor_smooth — Isaac Lab contact sensor with EMA smoothing |
| Typical force range | ±50 N per axis |
| Typical torque range | ±10 N·m per axis |
The wrench is reported at the end-effector body frame attached to the Franka gripper link. Forces are measured via Isaac Lab's get_link_incoming_joint_force() method applied to the wrist joint, then smoothed with an exponential moving average (EMA factor configurable, default 0.2).
Note:
observation.wrenchcontains the same data asobservation.state[16:22]. The wrench is stored as a dedicated column for direct access without index arithmetic.
Quick Start
from lerobot.datasets.lerobot_dataset import LeRobotDataset
# Load dataset
dataset = LeRobotDataset("EXOKERN/contactbench-forge-peginsert-v0")
print(f"Episodes: {dataset.num_episodes}, Frames: {len(dataset)}")
# Access a single frame
frame = dataset[0]
state = frame["observation.state"] # (24,) — full observation
wrench = frame["observation.wrench"] # (6,) — force/torque
# Decompose wrench
force = wrench[:3] # [Fx, Fy, Fz] in N
torque = wrench[3:] # [Mx, My, Mz] in N·m
print(f"Force: {force} N")
print(f"Torque: {torque} N·m")
# Decompose state vector
ee_pos = state[0:3] # fingertip position (m)
ee_pos_rel = state[3:6] # position relative to socket (m)
ee_quat = state[6:10] # orientation quaternion
ee_linvel = state[10:13] # linear velocity (m/s)
ee_angvel = state[13:16] # angular velocity (rad/s)
wrench_state = state[16:22] # force/torque (N, N·m) — same as observation.wrench
f_threshold = state[22] # force threshold (N)
ema = state[23] # EMA smoothing factor
Load with pure HuggingFace Datasets
from datasets import load_dataset
ds = load_dataset("EXOKERN/contactbench-forge-peginsert-v0", split="train")
print(ds[0].keys())
Experimental Results: The Value of Force/Torque
We trained a Behavior Cloning (BC) policy on this dataset to ablate the impact of Force/Torque data on the Peg-In-Hole task. Both policies achieve a 100% insertion success rate, but the difference in physical execution is massive:
| Condition | Success Rate | Avg Contact Force (N) |
|---|---|---|
| Kinematics Only | 100.0% | 6.4 N |
| With Force/Torque | 100.0% | 0.1 N |
Conclusion: Both policies solve the geometric task. But the F/T-aware policy performs the insertion softly like an expert, reducing contact forces by 98.4%. In industrial applications, this is the difference between a successful assembly and a damaged part.
Data Collection
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| RL Algorithm | rl_games PPO (~200 epochs, reward ~352) |
| Environment | Isaac-Forge-PegInsert-Direct-v0 |
| Collection mode | Single-env rollout (num_envs=1), deterministic policy |
| Episode horizon | Fixed 149 steps (no early termination during collection) |
| Sensor bandwidth | 20 Hz (matched to control frequency) |
| Contact dynamics | PhysX GPU solver, Isaac Lab default parameters |
| Domain randomization | FORGE defaults (controller gains, friction, mass, dead-zone) |
Intended Use
Research applications:
- Training and benchmarking force-aware manipulation policies
- Sim-to-real transfer studies for contact-rich assembly
- Hybrid vision + force/torque policy architectures
- Evaluating the effect of F/T data on manipulation performance
Not intended for:
- Direct deployment on physical robots without sim-to-real calibration
- Safety-critical applications without additional validation
Reproduction
Methodology documentation available upon request. Visit exokern.com for details.
Related Work
This dataset builds on the following research:
- FORGE — Noseworthy et al., "Force-Guided Exploration for Robust Contact-Rich Manipulation under Uncertainty" (ISRR 2024)
- Factory — Narang et al., "Factory: Fast Contact for Robotic Assembly" (RSS 2022)
- IndustReal — Tang et al., "IndustReal: Transferring Contact-Rich Assembly Tasks from Simulation to Reality" (RSS 2023)
- LeRobot — Cadene et al., "LeRobot: State-of-the-art Machine Learning for Real-World Robotics" (2024)
License
CC-BY-NC 4.0 — Free for research and non-commercial use.
Commercial licensing and custom Contact Skill Packs available from EXOKERN. Visit exokern.com for enterprise inquiries.
About EXOKERN
EXOKERN — The Data Engine for Physical AI
We produce industrially calibrated force/torque manipulation data for enterprise robotics, humanoid manufacturers, and research institutions. Contact-rich. Sensor-annotated. Industrially validated.
🌐 exokern.com · 🤗 huggingface.co/EXOKERN
Citation
@dataset{exokern_contactbench_peginsert_v0,
title = {ContactBench v0: Peg Insertion with Force/Torque},
author = {{EXOKERN}},
year = {2026},
url = {https://huggingface.co/datasets/EXOKERN/contactbench-forge-peginsert-v0},
note = {2,221 episodes, 330K frames, 6-axis F/T, LeRobot v3.0 format}
}
- Downloads last month
- 7