GraphRecSys

Production-style recommendation system that combines graph retrieval, causal debiasing, multi-objective ranking, calibrated probabilities, vector search, and low-latency serving.

This project is designed as an end-to-end recommender systems portfolio piece: it starts from raw KuaiRec interaction logs, trains a debiased LightGCN retrieval model, indexes item embeddings with FAISS, ranks candidates with an MMoE multi-task model, calibrates click probabilities, and serves personalized recommendations through FastAPI with Redis-backed embedding caching.

Why This Project Exists

Most recommender demos stop at model training. Real recommendation systems are pipelines: data quality, retrieval, ranking, calibration, serving latency, offline evaluation, and product trade-offs all matter at the same time.

GraphRec-MultiOpt demonstrates those production concerns in one coherent system:

  • Retrieval: graph collaborative filtering with LightGCN.
  • Debiasing: inverse propensity weighting to reduce exposure bias.
  • Ranking: multi-task MMoE for click probability and expected value.
  • Calibration: Platt scaling and reliability diagrams for trustworthy probabilities.
  • Serving: FastAPI endpoint with FAISS candidate retrieval, Redis cache, scalarization, and diversity reranking.
  • Decision support: mock A/B simulation and Pareto frontier analysis for engagement vs. value trade-offs.

System Architecture

flowchart LR
    raw["KuaiRec raw logs"] --> loader["Schema validation + labels"]
    loader --> split["Temporal train/val/test split"]
    split --> graph_data["PyG bipartite graph"]
    split --> propensity["Item propensity estimates"]

    graph_data --> lightgcn["LightGCN retrieval"]
    propensity --> lightgcn
    lightgcn --> embeddings["User/item embeddings"]

    embeddings --> faiss["FAISS IVF-PQ index"]
    embeddings --> features["Ranking feature builder"]
    split --> features
    features --> mmoe["MMoE ranker"]
    mmoe --> calibration["Platt calibration"]

    faiss --> api["FastAPI /recommend"]
    mmoe --> api
    calibration --> api
    redis["Redis embedding cache"] --> api
    api --> response["Top-10 recommendations"]

    mmoe --> ab["Mock A/B simulation"]
    ab --> pareto["Pareto frontier"]

Technical Highlights

Area Implementation
Dataset KuaiRec dense multi-action logs
Retrieval LightGCN with 3 graph propagation layers
Retrieval loss BPR with optional inverse propensity weighting
Negative sampling Uniform sampler with API reserved for hard negatives
Vector search FAISS IVF-PQ, configurable nprobe
Ranking model Multi-gate Mixture-of-Experts with click and value towers
Ranking targets label_click = watch_ratio >= 0.5, label_value = log1p(watch_ratio)
Calibration Platt scaling on validation logits
Diversity Maximal Marginal Relevance reranking
Serving Async FastAPI app with latency breakdown
Cache Redis user embedding cache with TTL
Evaluation Recall@K, NDCG@K, AUC, MSE/RMSE, ECE, latency, Pareto sweep
Tracking MLflow metrics and artifacts

Repository Layout

.
β”œβ”€β”€ data/
β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ download.py
β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ raw/
β”‚   └── processed/
β”œβ”€β”€ src/
β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ data/          # loading, splitting, graph construction, propensity
β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ retrieval/     # LightGCN, BPR, negative sampling, retrieval eval
β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ indexing/      # FAISS index build/query/benchmark
β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ ranking/       # feature builder, MMoE, calibration, ranking eval
β”‚   β”œβ”€β”€ serving/       # FastAPI, Redis cache, schemas, scoring
β”‚   └── evaluation/    # A/B simulation, Pareto frontier, results report
β”œβ”€β”€ configs/
β”œβ”€β”€ tests/
β”œβ”€β”€ scripts/
β”œβ”€β”€ outputs/
β”œβ”€β”€ checkpoints/
β”œβ”€β”€ Dockerfile
β”œβ”€β”€ implementation_plan.md
└── recsys_architecture.md

Modeling Approach

1. Data And Labels

The data layer validates KuaiRec interaction logs, derives model targets, and creates train/validation/test splits.

label_click = (watch_ratio >= 0.5).astype(int)
label_value = np.log1p(watch_ratio)

The graph builder creates a PyTorch Geometric HeteroData bipartite graph:

  • Node types: user, item
  • Edge type: ("user", "interacts", "item")
  • Reverse edge type for message passing
  • Edge weights from clipped watch ratio

2. Debiased Retrieval

The retrieval stage trains LightGCN using Bayesian Personalized Ranking:

loss = -mean(IPS(item) * log sigmoid(score(user, positive) - score(user, negative)))

The IPS term upweights less frequently exposed items, reducing the tendency of the retrieval model to overfit historical exposure patterns.

3. Multi-Objective Ranking

The ranking model uses MMoE to optimize two related objectives:

  • pClick tower: calibrated probability that the user meaningfully engages.
  • E-value tower: expected value proxy based on watch ratio.

Ranking features combine:

  • user embedding
  • item embedding
  • time/session context
  • item duration
  • category representation

Total feature dimension: 1046.

4. Serving-Time Optimization

The serving endpoint follows the same shape used by production recommendation stacks:

  1. Fetch user embedding from Redis or local embedding table.
  2. Retrieve top-K candidates from FAISS.
  3. Build ranking features for candidates.
  4. Score candidates with MMoE.
  5. Apply Platt calibration.
  6. Scalarize engagement and value.
  7. Apply MMR diversity reranking.
  8. Return top-10 items with latency breakdown.

Quickstart

Install

python -m venv .venv
source .venv/bin/activate
pip install -r requirements.txt

Run The Pipeline

bash scripts/run_pipeline.sh

The pipeline follows the architecture sequence:

download -> preprocess -> graph -> propensity -> LightGCN -> FAISS -> ranking -> calibration -> evaluation -> serving

For raw data without timestamps, the split script can use a deterministic fallback:

python -m src.data.splits --allow_no_timestamp

Run FAISS Benchmark

bash scripts/run_benchmark.sh

Benchmark output is written to:

outputs/faiss_benchmark.csv

Serving API

Start the service:

uvicorn src.serving.app:app --host 0.0.0.0 --port 8000

Health check:

curl http://localhost:8000/health

Recommendation request:

curl http://localhost:8000/recommend/0

Example response shape:

{
  "user_id": 0,
  "items": [
    {
      "item_id": 123,
      "p_click": 0.71,
      "e_value": 1.42,
      "final_score": 0.82
    }
  ],
  "retrieval_latency_ms": 6.4,
  "ranking_latency_ms": 14.8,
  "total_latency_ms": 23.1,
  "cache_hit": true
}

Prometheus-compatible metrics:

curl http://localhost:8000/metrics

Reload model artifacts:

curl -X POST http://localhost:8000/reload

Evaluation

The project evaluates recommender quality at multiple layers.

Layer Metrics
Retrieval Recall@10, Recall@20, Recall@50, Recall@500, NDCG@10
Ranking ROC-AUC, MSE, RMSE
Calibration ECE before/after Platt scaling, reliability curve
Serving p50, p95, p99 latency
Product trade-off Simulated CTR, GMV proxy, diversity, Pareto frontier

Generate the final results table:

python -m src.evaluation.report

Outputs:

outputs/results_table.csv
outputs/results_table.md
outputs/calibration_curve.png
outputs/pareto_curve.png

Results

Metrics are generated after running the full pipeline. This table is intentionally artifact-driven so reported numbers come from reproducible runs rather than hand-edited README values.

Metric LightGCN + IPS MMoE single-task MMoE multi-task
Recall@500 0.0011 - -
NDCG@10 0.0443 - -
AUC (pClick) - 0.8319 0.8223
ECE (after cal.) - - 0.0677
MSE (E-value) - 0.1172 0.0787
p50 latency ms 0.04 - -
p99 latency ms 0.13 - -

Configuration

The system is config-driven:

  • configs/retrieval.yaml
  • configs/ranking.yaml
  • configs/serving.yaml

Examples:

model:
  emb_dim: 512
  num_layers: 3

training:
  lr: 1.0e-3
  batch_size: 4096
  epochs: 100

ips:
  clip_max: 10.0

Serving trade-offs can be tuned without changing model code:

scoring:
  w_engagement: 0.6
  w_revenue: 0.4
  lambda_diversity: 0.3
  top_n_serve: 10

Docker

Build:

docker build -t graphrec-multiopt .

Run:

docker run -p 8000:8000 graphrec-multiopt

For real experiments, mount model artifacts and processed data as volumes:

docker run \
  -p 8000:8000 \
  -v "$(pwd)/data:/app/data" \
  -v "$(pwd)/checkpoints:/app/checkpoints" \
  graphrec-multiopt

Engineering Notes

This repository is structured to show senior-level recommender systems judgment:

  • Separates retrieval and ranking instead of forcing one model to do both.
  • Includes causal debiasing through IPS rather than optimizing only observed engagement.
  • Treats probability calibration as a first-class serving concern.
  • Uses vector search and caching to reflect real serving constraints.
  • Adds diversity reranking to avoid purely exploitative recommendations.
  • Exposes business-level trade-offs through scalarization and Pareto analysis.
  • Keeps training, serving, and evaluation configuration outside model code.

Known Limitations

  • KuaiRec timestamp availability varies by source file; the splitter supports temporal mode when timestamps are present and an explicit deterministic fallback otherwise.
  • The current hard-negative sampling interface is reserved, while uniform negative sampling is implemented.
  • Full reported metrics require running the pipeline on the downloaded dataset.
  • Redis is optional for local development but recommended for serving realism.
  • FAISS IVF-PQ configuration may need scaling down for tiny smoke-test datasets.

Roadmap

  • Add hard negative sampling from FAISS retrieval misses.
  • Add popularity and matrix-factorization baselines.
  • Add online feature store abstraction for serving-time context.
  • Add load tests for concurrent recommendation traffic.
  • Add Docker Compose for API + Redis + MLflow.
  • Add CI workflow for unit tests, linting, and smoke-mode pipeline execution.

Resume Summary

Built an end-to-end production-style recommendation system using PyTorch, PyTorch Geometric, FAISS, Redis, FastAPI, and MLflow. Implemented LightGCN retrieval with IPS debiasing, MMoE multi-task ranking, Platt calibration, MMR diversity reranking, vector-search serving, offline A/B simulation, and Pareto frontier analysis for engagement/value trade-off optimization.

Downloads last month

-

Downloads are not tracked for this model. How to track
Inference Providers NEW
This model isn't deployed by any Inference Provider. πŸ™‹ Ask for provider support

Dataset used to train sagar4tech/GraphRecSys