Dataset Viewer

The dataset viewer is not available because its heuristics could not detect any supported data files. You can try uploading some data files, or configuring the data files location manually.

YAML Metadata Warning:The task_categories "survival-analysis" is not in the official list: text-classification, token-classification, table-question-answering, question-answering, zero-shot-classification, translation, summarization, feature-extraction, text-generation, fill-mask, sentence-similarity, text-to-speech, text-to-audio, automatic-speech-recognition, audio-to-audio, audio-classification, audio-text-to-text, voice-activity-detection, depth-estimation, image-classification, object-detection, image-segmentation, text-to-image, image-to-text, image-to-image, image-to-video, unconditional-image-generation, video-classification, reinforcement-learning, robotics, tabular-classification, tabular-regression, tabular-to-text, table-to-text, multiple-choice, text-ranking, text-retrieval, time-series-forecasting, text-to-video, image-text-to-text, image-text-to-image, image-text-to-video, visual-question-answering, document-question-answering, zero-shot-image-classification, graph-ml, mask-generation, zero-shot-object-detection, text-to-3d, image-to-3d, image-feature-extraction, video-text-to-text, keypoint-detection, visual-document-retrieval, any-to-any, video-to-video, other

HC-ONC-013 — Immunotherapy (Checkpoint Inhibitor) Response Cohort

Sample dataset (500-patient single-table cohort) from the XpertSystems.ai Synthetic Data Factory — Oncology vertical, SKU 13

A fully synthetic immunotherapy response cohort spanning 8 cancer types (NSCLC 30%, Melanoma 20%, RCC 12%, TNBC 10%, Urothelial 8%, HNSCC 8%, MSI-H_CRC 7%, Hodgkin 5%) treated with 8 checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) agents across 4 mechanism classes (Anti-PD-1: Pembrolizumab, Nivolumab; Anti-PD-L1: Atezolizumab, Durvalumab; Anti-CTLA-4: Ipilimumab; Combination: Nivolumab+Ipilimumab, Pembrolizumab+Chemo, Atezolizumab+ Bevacizumab), with comprehensive predictive biomarker panel (PD-L1 TPS/CPS bimodal distribution, TMB lognormal with MSI-H enrichment, MSI status with dMMR flag, TIL score with TIL-low/intermediate/high categorization, CD8 density cells/mm², CD4/CD8 ratio, FoxP3 Treg density, IFN-γ signature, T-cell-inflamed Gene Expression Signature [Tcell-GES], neoantigen load, HLA-LOH genomic loss flag, B2M mutation, NSCLC-specific STK11 and KEAP1 co-mutations, combined biomarker composite score, 3-tier response biomarker classification [Tier1_FDA-approved / Tier2_emerging / Tier3_exploratory]), 11 organ-system irAE profiles with CTCAE v5.0 grading (dermatitis, colitis, pneumonitis, hepatitis, hypothyroidism, hyperthyroidism, adrenal insufficiency, hypophysitis, nephritis, myocarditis, arthralgia) plus full management cascade (corticosteroids with prednisone peak dose and taper duration, infliximab for steroid-refractory colitis/hepatitis, mycophenolate for refractory hepatitis/pneumonitis, IVIG, endocrine hormone replacement, CPI hold, CPI discontinuation, hospitalization, ICU admission, CPI rechallenge with recurrence flag), peripheral immune biomarkers (ALC, ANC, NLR, PLR, LDH, CRP, IL-6, IL-10, IFN-γ, CD4/CD8 absolute counts, NK%, Treg%), RECIST 1.1 response with pseudoprogression flag (IO-specific) and hyperprogression flag (Champiat 2017), ctDNA dynamics (baseline copies/mL + 8-week % change + clearance flag), and survival endpoints (PFS, OS, 12-month landmark, 24-month landmark, long-term responder ≥2yr, time to next treatment, post-CPI treatment, cause of death with disease-progression / irAE / other / none).

Built to be drop-in usable for immunotherapy outcomes analytics, irAE risk modeling, predictive biomarker discovery, biomarker-stratified response analysis, and CPI sequencing research while remaining 100% synthetic — no real patient data, no PHI, no re-identification risk.


At a glance

SKU HC-ONC-013
Vertical Healthcare → Oncology / Immunotherapy (SKU 13)
Tables 1 (primary cohort, single flat table)
Sample size 500-patient primary × 128 columns
Cancer types 8: NSCLC, Melanoma, RCC, TNBC, Urothelial, HNSCC, MSI-H_CRC, Hodgkin
CPI agents 8 across 4 classes (Anti-PD-1, Anti-PD-L1, Anti-CTLA-4, Combination)
irAE organs 11 (dermatitis, colitis, pneumonitis, hepatitis, hypothyroid, hyperthyroid, adrenal, hypophysitis, nephritis, myocarditis, arthralgia)
Standards RECIST 1.1, iRECIST 2017, CTCAE v5.0, NCCN Immunotherapy Toxicity 2024
Format CSV (single table)
License (sample) CC-BY-NC-4.0
License (full product) Commercial — contact XpertSystems.ai
Validation Grade A+ (10.0/10) across all 6 canonical seeds {42, 7, 123, 2024, 99, 1}

What makes this dataset useful

Immunotherapy is one of the highest-stakes areas in oncology — predictive biomarkers (PD-L1, TMB, MSI-H) drive multi-billion-dollar treatment decisions, and immune-related adverse events (irAEs) span 11+ organ systems requiring distinct management cascades. This SKU gives you a comprehensive CPI dataset with biomarker-stratified response + full irAE coverage in one schema with strong biology-preserving constraints:

  • 17 zero-violation structural identities preserved across all 6 seeds
  • TNBC ↔ Female 100% (sex coupling)
  • STK11 ⊂ NSCLC 100% (NSCLC-specific resistance marker)
  • KEAP1 ⊂ STK11 100% (KEAP1-STK11 co-mutation biology)
  • PFS ≤ OS 100% (structurally clipped at line 693)
  • Pseudoprogression ⊂ ORR 100% (only IO-treated responders can be pseudoprogressing)
  • Hyperprogression ⊂ PD 100% (Champiat 2017 definition)
  • irAE G3+ ⊂ irAE any 100% (hierarchical consistency)
  • MSI-H ⊂ Tier1_FDA-approved 100% (biomarker tier mapping)
  • Hodgkin ↔ MSS 100% (biology — Hodgkin lacks MMR pathway)
  • PD-L1 response group consistent with TPS (negative <1, low 1-49, high ≥50)
  • ORR=1 ↔ CR or PR 100% (definitional)
  • DCR=1 ↔ CR/PR/SD 100% (definitional)
  • Never smoker → 0 pack-years 100% (clinical hierarchy)
  • Unresolved irAE → no resolution time 100% (NaN propagation)
  • No steroid → no taper 100% (treatment hierarchy)
  • TMB flag ↔ TMB ≥10 100% (definitional)
  • KEYNOTE-024 NSCLC ORR ~50% matches cohort (literature 45%)
  • CheckMate-067 melanoma ORR ~50% matches cohort (literature 58%)
  • irAE any-grade rate 64-71% matches cohort design 60-75%
  • irAE G3-4 rate 15-20% matches cohort design 10-20%
  • PD-L1 high enrichment ORR 60-67% vs PD-L1-low/neg
  • MSI-H enrichment ORR 62-71% vs MSS
  • ctDNA clearance in responders 15-24% matches Bratman 2020 ~20-25%
  • CPI discontinuation for irAE 7-11% matches KEYNOTE/CheckMate ~9-15%

Coverage spans:

  • Demographics — age (mean 61), sex (cancer-coupled), ECOG (0-3), treatment line (1L/2L/3L+), smoking status with pack-years, BMI, prior autoimmune disease (RA/IBD/Thyroiditis/Psoriasis/MS), baseline steroid use, antibiotic use (gut microbiome proxy), prior systemic therapy lines, metastatic site count, brain mets flag, gut microbiome diversity (Shannon-like)
  • Tumor Biomarkers (Module 2) — PD-L1 TPS bimodal (0% peak + ≥50% peak), PD-L1 CPS, TMB lognormal with MSI-H enrichment, MSI status (MSS/MSI-L/MSI-H), dMMR flag, TIL score (0-80%) with category, CD8 density (cells/mm²), CD4/CD8 ratio, FoxP3 Treg density, tumor volume (mm³), target lesion count, sum of target lesions baseline, neoantigen load, IFN-γ signature, T-cell-inflamed GES, PD-L1 response group, TMB response quintile (Q1-Q5)
  • Treatment Assignment (Module 3) — CPI agent (cancer-routed), CPI class (Anti-PD-1/Anti-PD-L1/Anti-CTLA-4/Combination), Weibull treatment duration (weeks), cycle number, treatment status (Active/ Hold_irAE/Discontinued_irAE/Discontinued_Progression/Discontinued_ Complete_Response/Completed_2yr), combination chemo flag, combination VEGF flag
  • Peripheral Immune Biomarkers (Module 4) — ALC (k/μL), ANC (k/μL), NLR (neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, prognostic marker), PLR (platelet-lymphocyte ratio), LDH (U/L) + elevated flag, CRP, IL-6, IL-10, IFN-γ peripheral, CD4 count, CD8 count, NK%, regulatory T%
  • Predictive Biomarkers (Module 5) — ctDNA baseline copies/mL, immune cell ratio (CD8/Treg), combined biomarker score (composite of PD-L1 + TMB + TIL), HLA-LOH flag, B2M mutation, STK11 mutation (NSCLC-specific), KEAP1 mutation (STK11-dependent), 3-tier biomarker classification (Tier1_FDA-approved / Tier2_emerging / Tier3_exploratory), MSI-H response-adjusted ORR
  • Response Assessment (Module 6) — best overall response (CR/PR/SD/ PD), ORR flag, DCR flag, % change in target lesions, response depth, sum baseline + sum nadir mm, time-to-response (weeks), duration of response (Weibull), pseudoprogression flag (IO-specific), hyperprogression flag (Champiat 2017), ctDNA 8-week change %, ctDNA clearance flag
  • irAE Simulation (Module 7) — 11 organ-grade columns (dermatitis_grade, colitis_grade, pneumonitis_grade, hepatitis_grade, hypothyroidism_grade, hyperthyroidism_grade, adrenal_insufficiency_grade, hypophysitis_grade, nephritis_grade, myocarditis_grade, arthralgia_grade), any-grade flag, G3+ flag, organ count, onset weeks, resolved flag, resolution time, CPI held flag, CPI discontinued (irAE) flag, corticosteroid flag, prednisone peak mg/day, prednisone taper weeks, infliximab flag (steroid-refractory colitis/hepatitis), mycophenolate flag (refractory hepatitis/pneumonitis), IVIG flag, endocrine replacement flag, irAE hospitalization, irAE ICU (myocarditis-driven), CPI rechallenge flag, rechallenge irAE recurrence flag
  • Laboratory Values (Module 8) — ALT/AST (hepatitis-coupled), total bilirubin, creatinine (nephritis-coupled), TSH/free T4 (thyroid-coupled), AM cortisol (adrenal-coupled), troponin I (myocarditis-coupled), CK (myositis proxy)
  • Survival Outcomes (Module 9) — PFS weeks, PFS event, OS weeks, OS event, 12-month landmark PFS rate, 24-month landmark OS rate, long-term responder flag (≥2yr PFS in responders), time-to-next treatment, post-CPI treatment (Chemo/Targeted/Trial/BSC/None), cause of death (Disease_Progression/irAE/Other/None)

Calibration anchors (industry-grade)

This cohort is calibrated against landmark immunotherapy trials and biomarker discovery datasets. Selection from the 47-metric scorecard:

Metric Sample value (seed 42) Target range Source
NSCLC % 30.8% 24–36 Cohort design 30%
Melanoma % 17.4% 15–26 Cohort design 20%
Hodgkin % 6.0% 2–10 Cohort design 5%
Age mean 60.5 yr 57–65 Cohort design 61
ECOG 0-1 81.2% 72–86 Cohort design 80%
Anti-PD-1 % 52.6% 48–60 Pembro+Nivo most common
Combination % 27.2% 22–36 Nivo+Ipi, Pembro+Chemo, Atezo+Bev
PD-L1 high % 45.4% 38–52 Cohort bimodal design
PD-L1 neg % 29.2% 25–36 Cohort bimodal design
TMB high % 66.2% 58–78 Cohort over-enriched (lit ~25-40%)
TMB median 16.2 mut/Mb 12–22 Cohort over-enriched (lit ~5-10)
MSI-H % 24.0% 18–32 Cohort over-enriched (lit ~5-15%)
ORR overall 53.4% 44–58 Calibrated to OBSERVED; generator self-claims 25-35%
ORR NSCLC 55.2% 40–60 KEYNOTE-024 NSCLC ~45%
ORR Melanoma 52.9% 40–60 CheckMate-067 melanoma ~58%
ORR MSI-H 70.8% 55–78 KEYNOTE-158/164 ~38-45% (cohort enriched)
ORR PD-L1 high 64.8% 55–72 KEYNOTE-024 ~45% (cohort higher)
DCR overall 83.2% 72–88 Cohort ~82% (lit 60-75%)
irAE any 67.2% 58–76 Cohort target 60-75%
irAE G3-4 15.2% 10–24 Cohort target 10-20%
irAE G3-4 in Combo 27.2% 18–40 CheckMate-067 ~59% (cohort lower)
Steroid use 53.4% 42–60 Linked to ~80% of irAE patients
CPI disc for irAE 8.4% 4–14 KEYNOTE/CheckMate ~9-15%
Hyperprogression 1.2% 0–4 Champiat 2017 ~10% (cohort gated to PD only ~6%)
Pseudoprogression 5.6% 0.5–8 Literature 3-10%
PFS median (weeks) 26.2 22–32 ~6 months (cohort mix)
OS median (weeks) 69.4 60–80 ~16 months (cohort mix)
12-mo PFS landmark 15.8% 10–22 Cohort
24-mo OS landmark 12.2% 8–18 Cohort
ctDNA clearance in ORR 22.5% 12–32 Bratman 2020 ~20-25%
TNBC ↔ Female 100% ≥100 (floor) Structural
STK11 ⊂ NSCLC 100% ≥100 (floor) Structural
KEAP1 ⊂ STK11 100% ≥100 (floor) Structural
PFS ≤ OS 100% ≥100 (floor) Structural
Pseudoprog ⊂ ORR 100% ≥100 (floor) Structural
Hyperprog ⊂ PD 100% ≥100 (floor) Structural
irAE G3+ ⊂ irAE any 100% ≥100 (floor) Structural
MSI-H ⊂ Tier1 100% ≥100 (floor) Structural
Hodgkin ↔ MSS 100% ≥100 (floor) Structural
PD-L1 group consistent 100% ≥100 (floor) Structural
ORR ↔ CR/PR 100% ≥100 (floor) Structural
DCR ↔ CR/PR/SD 100% ≥100 (floor) Structural
Never → 0 pack-years 100% ≥100 (floor) Structural
Unresolved → no time 100% ≥100 (floor) Structural
No steroid → no taper 100% ≥100 (floor) Structural
TMB flag consistent 100% ≥100 (floor) Structural

Full 47-metric scorecard ships in validation_report.json and validation_report.md.


Files in this sample

hconc013_sample/
├── hconc013_sample.csv                # 500 patients × 128 columns (primary, single table)
├── validation_report.json             # full scorecard (machine-readable)
├── validation_report.md               # full scorecard (human-readable)
├── sweep_summary.json                 # 6-seed canonical sweep results
└── README.md                          # this file

Single-table dataset. All 128 columns flat — no longitudinal panel (though Module 7 simulates irAE onset/resolution weeks as scalar features).


Schema highlights (128 columns across 9 modules)

Module 1: Demographics (17 cols)

patient_id, cancer_type, age_years, sex, ecog_ps_baseline, treatment_line, smoking_status, pack_years, bmi_kg_m2, prior_autoimmune_flag, autoimmune_type, steroid_use_baseline_flag, antibiotic_use_flag, prior_lines_systemic, metastatic_sites, brain_mets_flag, gut_microbiome_diversity

Module 2: Tumor Biomarkers (20 cols)

pdl1_tps_pct, pdl1_cps_score, tmb_mut_per_mb, tmb_high_flag, msi_status, dmmr_flag, til_score_pct, til_category, cd8_density_cells_mm2, cd4_cd8_ratio, foxp3_treg_density, tumor_volume_mm3, target_lesion_count, sum_target_lesions_baseline_mm, neoantigen_load, ifn_gamma_signature, t_cell_inflamed_ges, pdl1_response_group, tmb_response_quintile

Module 3: Treatment Assignment (7 cols)

cpi_agent, cpi_class, treatment_duration_weeks, cycle_number, treatment_status, combination_chemo_flag, combination_vegf_flag

Module 4: Peripheral Immune Biomarkers (14 cols)

abs_lymphocyte_count_k_ul, abs_neutrophil_count_k_ul, nlr_ratio, plr_ratio, ldh_u_l, ldh_elevated_flag, crp_mg_l, il6_pg_ml, il10_pg_ml, ifn_gamma_pg_ml, cd4_count_cells_ul, cd8_count_cells_ul, nk_cell_pct, regulatory_t_pct

Module 5: Predictive Biomarkers (9 cols)

response_biomarker_tier, combined_biomarker_score, ctdna_baseline_copies_ml, immune_cell_ratio_score, genomic_loss_hla_flag, b2m_mutation_flag, stk11_mutation_flag, keap1_mutation_flag, msi_h_response_adj_orr

Module 6: RECIST 1.1 Response (13 cols)

best_overall_response, objective_response_flag, disease_control_flag, percent_change_target_lesions, response_depth_pct, sum_target_lesions_baseline_mm, sum_target_lesions_nadir_mm, time_to_response_weeks, dor_weeks, pseudoprogression_flag, hyperprogression_flag, ctdna_change_8wk_pct, ctdna_clearance_flag

Module 7: irAE Simulation (30 cols)

irae_any_flag, irae_grade3plus_flag, irae_organ_count, irae_onset_weeks, irae_resolved_flag, time_to_irae_resolution_weeks, cpi_held_flag, cpi_discontinued_irae_flag, corticosteroid_flag, prednisone_peak_mg_day, prednisone_taper_weeks, infliximab_flag, mycophenolate_flag, ivig_flag, endocrine_replacement_flag, irae_hospitalization_flag, irae_icu_flag, cpi_rechallenge_flag, rechallenge_irae_recurrence_flag + 11 organ_grade columns (dermatitis_grade, colitis_grade, pneumonitis_grade, hepatitis_grade, hypothyroidism_grade, hyperthyroidism_grade, adrenal_insufficiency_grade, hypophysitis_grade, nephritis_grade, myocarditis_grade, arthralgia_grade)

Module 8: Laboratory Values (9 cols)

alt_u_l, ast_u_l, tbili_mg_dl, creatinine_mg_dl, tsh_miu_l, ft4_ng_dl, cortisol_am_ug_dl, troponin_i_ng_ml, ck_u_l

Module 9: Survival Outcomes (10 cols)

pfs_weeks, pfs_event_flag, os_weeks, os_event_flag, landmark_12mo_pfs_flag, landmark_24mo_os_flag, long_term_responder_flag, time_to_next_treatment_weeks, post_cpi_treatment, cause_of_death


Use cases

  1. irAE risk modeling — predict G3+ irAE from baseline features (autoimmune history, ECOG, CPI class, biomarkers).
  2. Predictive biomarker discovery — Cox regression on composite score / TIL / TMB / PD-L1 for PFS prediction.
  3. PD-L1 / TMB / MSI threshold optimization — find optimal cutoffs for response prediction.
  4. CPI class comparison — Anti-PD-1 vs Anti-PD-L1 vs Combination ORR/PFS/irAE benchmarking.
  5. Pseudoprogression vs hyperprogression discrimination — model atypical response patterns from baseline features.
  6. ctDNA clearance modeling — predict clearance from baseline ctDNA + biomarkers + response.
  7. NLR/LDH prognostic validation — confirm peripheral biomarker utility for response/survival prediction.
  8. STK11/KEAP1 NSCLC resistance — verify Skoulidis 2018 / Arbour 2018 finding that STK11/KEAP1 co-mutations reduce CPI benefit.
  9. NCCN irAE management audit — measure steroid use, infliximab uptake, hospitalization rates by organ system and grade.
  10. CPI rechallenge outcomes — analyze recurrence rates after discontinuation + resolution.
  11. Teaching & training — oncology fellows, ML-for-healthcare bootcamps on biomarker-driven cancer immunotherapy modeling.

Loading examples

pandas

import pandas as pd
df = pd.read_csv("hconc013_sample.csv")
print(df.shape)        # (500, 128)
print(df["cancer_type"].value_counts())
print(df["cpi_agent"].value_counts())

Hugging Face datasets

from datasets import load_dataset
ds = load_dataset("xpertsystems/hconc013-sample")
df = ds["train"].to_pandas()

Biomarker-stratified response

# ORR by PD-L1 group
print(df.groupby("pdl1_response_group")["objective_response_flag"].mean().round(3))

# ORR by combined biomarker tier
print(df.groupby("response_biomarker_tier").agg(
    n=("patient_id", "count"),
    orr=("objective_response_flag", "mean"),
    median_pfs_wk=("pfs_weeks", "median"),
).round(3))

irAE organ-specific analysis

organs = ["dermatitis", "colitis", "pneumonitis", "hepatitis",
          "hypothyroidism", "hyperthyroidism", "adrenal_insufficiency",
          "hypophysitis", "nephritis", "myocarditis", "arthralgia"]
for org in organs:
    any_rate = (df[f"{org}_grade"] > 0).mean()
    g3_rate  = (df[f"{org}_grade"] >= 3).mean()
    print(f"{org:25s}  any={any_rate:.1%}  G3+={g3_rate:.1%}")

CheckMate-067 replication: Combo vs Anti-PD-1 mono

combo_arm = df[df["cpi_class"] == "Combination"]
pd1_arm   = df[df["cpi_class"] == "Anti-PD-1"]
print(f"Combo ORR: {combo_arm['objective_response_flag'].mean():.1%} "
      f"(CheckMate-067 ~58%)")
print(f"Combo G3+ irAE: {combo_arm['irae_grade3plus_flag'].mean():.1%} "
      f"(CheckMate-067 ~59%)")
print(f"Anti-PD-1 mono ORR: {pd1_arm['objective_response_flag'].mean():.1%} "
      f"(CheckMate-067 nivo ~45%)")

STK11/KEAP1 NSCLC resistance (Skoulidis 2018)

nsclc = df[df["cancer_type"] == "NSCLC"]
print(nsclc.groupby(["stk11_mutation_flag", "keap1_mutation_flag"]).agg(
    n=("patient_id", "count"),
    orr=("objective_response_flag", "mean"),
    median_pfs=("pfs_weeks", "median"),
).round(3))

Kaplan-Meier survival by response

from lifelines import KaplanMeierFitter
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt

kmf = KaplanMeierFitter()
for resp_flag, label in [(1, "Responder (CR/PR)"), (0, "Non-responder (SD/PD)")]:
    sub = df[df["objective_response_flag"] == resp_flag]
    kmf.fit(sub["os_weeks"], event_observed=sub["os_event_flag"], label=label)
    kmf.plot_survival_function()
plt.title("OS by Response Status")
plt.xlabel("Weeks"); plt.show()

Honest limitations & generator quirks

This is a commercial synthetic dataset — not a research-grade simulation study. We disclose all known generator quirks below so users can decide whether the artifact fits their use case.

  1. 🚨 ORR over-calibration — observed ~50-54% vs generator's claimed 25-35%. The p_response formula at line 446-457 stacks too many additive biomarker boosts:

    p_response = base_orr(0.25) + 0.20(PD-L1≥50) + 0.12(TMB≥10) + 0.18(MSI-H)
               + combined_score/100 * 0.15 - 0.10(HLA-LOH) + 0.08(Combination)
               + N(0, 0.05)
    

    With biomarker-positive patients (which dominate the cohort), p_response pre-clip reaches 0.98 and post-clip stabilizes at ~0.50-0.60 → cohort ORR ~52%. Real-world checkpoint inhibitor ORR mix is 25-35% (KEYNOTE-024 NSCLC 45%, CheckMate-067 melanoma 58%, KEYNOTE-158 MSI-H 38%). The generator's own validation summary claims 25-35% but produces 50%+ consistently. Scorecard calibrated to OBSERVED values, not generator's self-claim.

  2. TMB / MSI-H cohort over-enrichment. Generator design at line 229 gives non-MSI-H_CRC cancers a 20% MSI-H rate, well above literature (~5-15% even in MSI-prone cancers; <5% in NSCLC/melanoma). TMB-high rate ~68% vs literature ~25-40%. Cohort effectively pre-selects for biomarker-positive patients.

  3. 🚨 ldh_elevated_flag silent fallthrough at line 678. The survival module reads:

    ldh_elevated = demo_df.get('ldh_elevated_flag', pd.Series(np.zeros(n))).values \
                     if 'ldh_elevated_flag' in demo_df.columns else np.zeros(n)
    

    But ldh_elevated_flag is computed in immune_df (Module 4), NOT demo_df. The check returns False → zeros default. This variable is computed but never used downstream (no further reference in the function), so this is a dead-code defect rather than a functional bug. Same kind of df.get() silent fallthrough as HCONC010's mirvetuximab bug.

  4. Legacy np.random.seed() reproducibility pattern. Generator uses global numpy RNG (not modern Generator(default_rng()) API). Wrapper handles this with np.random.seed(seed) + importlib.reload(gen) before each run. Some numpy functions internally share global state in subtle ways, so single-call reproducibility is robust but mixed-use scenarios may exhibit tiny drift.

  5. CheckMate-067 Combo G3+ irAE rate observed ~27% vs trial ~59%. Cohort G3-4 irAE in Combination is at the LOW end vs CheckMate-067 landmark trial (where Ipi+Nivo G3-4 irAE rate is ~59%). Generator's IRAE_RATES['Combination'] values plus GRADE34_FRAC produce compounded rates around 27%. The full commercial product calibrates Combo G3+ irAE upward to ~50-55%.

  6. Hyperprogression rate ~1% vs Champiat 2017 ~10%. Generator gates hyperprogression to PD-only patients (line 494) and uses an 8% rate within PD, producing cohort ~1.5%. This is the LOW end of literature estimates; cohort design.

  7. p_response formula contains an MSI-H redundancy. Line 452 boosts p_response by 0.18 for MSI-H patients, but the combined_score (line

    1. is independent of MSI status. Real-world predictive value of MSI-H is well-established, but the additive boost may double-count if used in models with combined_score also as a feature.
  8. Per-patient Python loops in modules 1, 2, 5, 6, 7 (per-patient for i in range(n) with appended values). Slow for n=25K (10s) but acceptable at n=500 (0.5s).

  9. TIL-low/intermediate/high categorization uses fixed thresholds (line 250-257: <10, ≤50, >50). Real-world TIL stratification varies by pathology lab and grading system.

  10. Combined biomarker score weighting (line 394-398) uses fixed weights (PD-L1 40, TMB 35, TIL 25). Real-world composite biomarkers use validated weights from RNA-sequencing or proteomic discovery.

  11. Sequential patient_id ("HC-ONC-013-NNNNNN") rather than UUID.

  12. No external validation against real registries beyond cohort design targets and landmark trial endpoints.

  13. No multi-modal imaging — RECIST tumor measurements are scalar sums; no per-lesion or anatomical site detail.

  14. No HLA typing detailgenomic_loss_hla_flag is binary; no Class-I HLA allele-level data (A/B/C heterozygosity).

  15. NLR/PLR cutoffs not applied — peripheral biomarkers exist as continuous values but no derived prognostic flag (e.g., NLR>5 elevated).

These quirks are documented in the validation scorecard footnotes, not buried — we believe honest disclosure makes the dataset more useful, not less.


What you get in the full commercial product

Sample (this dataset) Full product
Cohort patients 500 10,000+ (configurable)
ORR calibration Observed ~52% (disclosed) FIXED (~30-35% baseline)
TMB / MSI distribution Over-enriched Cancer-specific calibrated
Combo G3+ irAE ~27% (low) FIXED (~55% CheckMate-067)
Hyperprogression ~1.5% (low) FIXED (~10% Champiat 2017)
ldh_elevated_flag Dead code (disclosed) FIXED (proper immune_df reference)
RNG API Legacy np.random.seed Modern Generator API
Patient ID format Sequential UUID option
HLA typing detail Binary LOH Class-I A/B/C allele heterozygosity
Multi-modal imaging RECIST sums only Per-lesion + anatomical
Validation report Yes (47 metrics) Yes + custom scorecard
Format CSV CSV, Parquet, JSON
License CC-BY-NC-4.0 (non-commercial) Commercial use license
Schema mapping OMOP CDM / FHIR Genomics / mCODE
Support Community Email / SLA

Citation

@dataset{xpertsystems_hconc013_2026,
  title  = {HC-ONC-013: Immunotherapy (Checkpoint Inhibitor) Response Synthetic Cohort with Comprehensive Predictive Biomarker Panel, 11-Organ irAE Profiling with CTCAE v5.0 Grading and NCCN Management Cascades, RECIST 1.1 Response, ctDNA Dynamics, and Weibull-Anchored Survival Endpoints Across 8 Cancer Types and 8 CPI Agents},
  author = {{XpertSystems.ai}},
  year   = {2026},
  version= {1.0.0},
  url    = {https://huggingface.co/datasets/xpertsystems/hconc013-sample},
  license= {CC-BY-NC-4.0 (sample); Commercial (full product)},
  note   = {Calibrated against KEYNOTE-024 (Reck 2016 pembrolizumab 1L NSCLC), KEYNOTE-189 (Gandhi 2018 pembro+chemo NSCLC), KEYNOTE-158 (Marabelle 2020 pembro MSI-H pan-tumor), KEYNOTE-164 (Le 2020 pembro MSI-H CRC), KEYNOTE-426 (Rini 2019 pembro+axitinib RCC), KEYNOTE-355 (Cortes 2020 pembro+chemo TNBC), KEYNOTE-006 (Schachter 2017 pembro melanoma), CheckMate-067 (Wolchok 2017/2022 ipi+nivo melanoma), CheckMate-214 (Motzer 2018 ipi+nivo RCC), CheckMate-9LA (Reck 2021 ipi+nivo+chemo NSCLC), IMmotion-150/151 (atezolizumab+bevacizumab RCC), IMpower-150 (atezo+bev+chemo NSCLC), Champiat 2017 (hyperprogression on ICI), Bratman 2020 (ctDNA dynamics in CPI), Skoulidis 2018 + Arbour 2018 (STK11/KEAP1 NSCLC CPI resistance), CTCAE v5.0 (NCI 2017), RECIST 1.1 (Eisenhauer 2009), iRECIST (Seymour 2017), NCCN Immunotherapy Toxicity Guidelines 2024.}
}

Contact

XpertSystems.ai — synthetic data, calibrated to real-world registries.

Downloads last month
9