url
stringclasses
147 values
commit
stringclasses
147 values
file_path
stringlengths
7
101
full_name
stringlengths
1
94
start
stringlengths
6
10
end
stringlengths
6
11
tactic
stringlengths
1
11.2k
state_before
stringlengths
3
2.09M
state_after
stringlengths
6
2.09M
input
stringlengths
73
2.09M
https://github.com/pthomas505/FOL.git
097a4abea51b641d144539b9a0f7516f3b9d818c
FOL/NV/Margaris/Fol.lean
FOL.NV.T_21_1
[1345, 1]
[1370, 15]
apply generalization
case h1 x y : VarName ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ (forall_ y ((eq_ x y).imp_ (eq_ y x)))
case h1.h1 x y : VarName ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ ((eq_ x y).imp_ (eq_ y x)) case h1.h2 x y : VarName ⊢ ∀ H ∈ ∅, ¬isFreeIn y H
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h1 x y : VarName ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ (forall_ y ((eq_ x y).imp_ (eq_ y x))) TACTIC:
https://github.com/pthomas505/FOL.git
097a4abea51b641d144539b9a0f7516f3b9d818c
FOL/NV/Margaris/Fol.lean
FOL.NV.T_21_1
[1345, 1]
[1370, 15]
apply IsDeduct.mp_ (eq_ y y)
case h1.h1 x y : VarName ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ ((eq_ x y).imp_ (eq_ y x))
case h1.h1.a x y : VarName ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ ((eq_ y y).imp_ ((eq_ x y).imp_ (eq_ y x))) case h1.h1.a x y : VarName ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ (eq_ y y)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h1.h1 x y : VarName ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ ((eq_ x y).imp_ (eq_ y x)) TACTIC:
https://github.com/pthomas505/FOL.git
097a4abea51b641d144539b9a0f7516f3b9d818c
FOL/NV/Margaris/Fol.lean
FOL.NV.T_21_1
[1345, 1]
[1370, 15]
apply IsDeduct.mp_ (((eq_ y y).and_ (eq_ x y)).imp_ ((eq_ y x).iff_ (eq_ y y)))
case h1.h1.a x y : VarName ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ ((eq_ y y).imp_ ((eq_ x y).imp_ (eq_ y x)))
case h1.h1.a.a x y : VarName ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ ((((eq_ y y).and_ (eq_ x y)).imp_ ((eq_ y x).iff_ (eq_ y y))).imp_ ((eq_ y y).imp_ ((eq_ x y).imp_ (eq_ y x)))) case h1.h1.a.a x y : VarName ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ (((eq_ y y).and_ (eq_ x y)).imp_ ((eq_ y x).iff_ (eq_ y y)))
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h1.h1.a x y : VarName ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ ((eq_ y y).imp_ ((eq_ x y).imp_ (eq_ y x))) TACTIC:
https://github.com/pthomas505/FOL.git
097a4abea51b641d144539b9a0f7516f3b9d818c
FOL/NV/Margaris/Fol.lean
FOL.NV.T_21_1
[1345, 1]
[1370, 15]
simp only [def_iff_]
case h1.h1.a.a x y : VarName ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ ((((eq_ y y).and_ (eq_ x y)).imp_ ((eq_ y x).iff_ (eq_ y y))).imp_ ((eq_ y y).imp_ ((eq_ x y).imp_ (eq_ y x))))
case h1.h1.a.a x y : VarName ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ ((((eq_ y y).and_ (eq_ x y)).imp_ (((eq_ y x).imp_ (eq_ y y)).and_ ((eq_ y y).imp_ (eq_ y x)))).imp_ ((eq_ y y).imp_ ((eq_ x y).imp_ (eq_ y x))))
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h1.h1.a.a x y : VarName ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ ((((eq_ y y).and_ (eq_ x y)).imp_ ((eq_ y x).iff_ (eq_ y y))).imp_ ((eq_ y y).imp_ ((eq_ x y).imp_ (eq_ y x)))) TACTIC:
https://github.com/pthomas505/FOL.git
097a4abea51b641d144539b9a0f7516f3b9d818c
FOL/NV/Margaris/Fol.lean
FOL.NV.T_21_1
[1345, 1]
[1370, 15]
simp only [def_and_]
case h1.h1.a.a x y : VarName ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ ((((eq_ y y).and_ (eq_ x y)).imp_ (((eq_ y x).imp_ (eq_ y y)).and_ ((eq_ y y).imp_ (eq_ y x)))).imp_ ((eq_ y y).imp_ ((eq_ x y).imp_ (eq_ y x))))
case h1.h1.a.a x y : VarName ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ ((((eq_ y y).imp_ (eq_ x y).not_).not_.imp_ (((eq_ y x).imp_ (eq_ y y)).imp_ ((eq_ y y).imp_ (eq_ y x)).not_).not_).imp_ ((eq_ y y).imp_ ((eq_ x y).imp_ (eq_ y x))))
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h1.h1.a.a x y : VarName ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ ((((eq_ y y).and_ (eq_ x y)).imp_ (((eq_ y x).imp_ (eq_ y y)).and_ ((eq_ y y).imp_ (eq_ y x)))).imp_ ((eq_ y y).imp_ ((eq_ x y).imp_ (eq_ y x)))) TACTIC:
https://github.com/pthomas505/FOL.git
097a4abea51b641d144539b9a0f7516f3b9d818c
FOL/NV/Margaris/Fol.lean
FOL.NV.T_21_1
[1345, 1]
[1370, 15]
SC
case h1.h1.a.a x y : VarName ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ ((((eq_ y y).imp_ (eq_ x y).not_).not_.imp_ (((eq_ y x).imp_ (eq_ y y)).imp_ ((eq_ y y).imp_ (eq_ y x)).not_).not_).imp_ ((eq_ y y).imp_ ((eq_ x y).imp_ (eq_ y x))))
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h1.h1.a.a x y : VarName ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ ((((eq_ y y).imp_ (eq_ x y).not_).not_.imp_ (((eq_ y x).imp_ (eq_ y y)).imp_ ((eq_ y y).imp_ (eq_ y x)).not_).not_).imp_ ((eq_ y y).imp_ ((eq_ x y).imp_ (eq_ y x)))) TACTIC:
https://github.com/pthomas505/FOL.git
097a4abea51b641d144539b9a0f7516f3b9d818c
FOL/NV/Margaris/Fol.lean
FOL.NV.T_21_1
[1345, 1]
[1370, 15]
apply specId y
case h1.h1.a.a x y : VarName ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ (((eq_ y y).and_ (eq_ x y)).imp_ ((eq_ y x).iff_ (eq_ y y)))
case h1.h1.a.a.h1 x y : VarName ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ (forall_ y (((eq_ y y).and_ (eq_ x y)).imp_ ((eq_ y x).iff_ (eq_ y y))))
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h1.h1.a.a x y : VarName ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ (((eq_ y y).and_ (eq_ x y)).imp_ ((eq_ y x).iff_ (eq_ y y))) TACTIC:
https://github.com/pthomas505/FOL.git
097a4abea51b641d144539b9a0f7516f3b9d818c
FOL/NV/Margaris/Fol.lean
FOL.NV.T_21_1
[1345, 1]
[1370, 15]
apply specId y
case h1.h1.a.a.h1 x y : VarName ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ (forall_ y (((eq_ y y).and_ (eq_ x y)).imp_ ((eq_ y x).iff_ (eq_ y y))))
case h1.h1.a.a.h1.h1 x y : VarName ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ (forall_ y (forall_ y (((eq_ y y).and_ (eq_ x y)).imp_ ((eq_ y x).iff_ (eq_ y y)))))
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h1.h1.a.a.h1 x y : VarName ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ (forall_ y (((eq_ y y).and_ (eq_ x y)).imp_ ((eq_ y x).iff_ (eq_ y y)))) TACTIC:
https://github.com/pthomas505/FOL.git
097a4abea51b641d144539b9a0f7516f3b9d818c
FOL/NV/Margaris/Fol.lean
FOL.NV.T_21_1
[1345, 1]
[1370, 15]
apply specId x
case h1.h1.a.a.h1.h1 x y : VarName ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ (forall_ y (forall_ y (((eq_ y y).and_ (eq_ x y)).imp_ ((eq_ y x).iff_ (eq_ y y)))))
case h1.h1.a.a.h1.h1.h1 x y : VarName ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ (forall_ x (forall_ y (forall_ y (((eq_ y y).and_ (eq_ x y)).imp_ ((eq_ y x).iff_ (eq_ y y))))))
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h1.h1.a.a.h1.h1 x y : VarName ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ (forall_ y (forall_ y (((eq_ y y).and_ (eq_ x y)).imp_ ((eq_ y x).iff_ (eq_ y y))))) TACTIC:
https://github.com/pthomas505/FOL.git
097a4abea51b641d144539b9a0f7516f3b9d818c
FOL/NV/Margaris/Fol.lean
FOL.NV.T_21_1
[1345, 1]
[1370, 15]
apply specId y
case h1.h1.a.a.h1.h1.h1 x y : VarName ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ (forall_ x (forall_ y (forall_ y (((eq_ y y).and_ (eq_ x y)).imp_ ((eq_ y x).iff_ (eq_ y y))))))
case h1.h1.a.a.h1.h1.h1.h1 x y : VarName ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ (forall_ y (forall_ x (forall_ y (forall_ y (((eq_ y y).and_ (eq_ x y)).imp_ ((eq_ y x).iff_ (eq_ y y)))))))
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h1.h1.a.a.h1.h1.h1 x y : VarName ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ (forall_ x (forall_ y (forall_ y (((eq_ y y).and_ (eq_ x y)).imp_ ((eq_ y x).iff_ (eq_ y y)))))) TACTIC:
https://github.com/pthomas505/FOL.git
097a4abea51b641d144539b9a0f7516f3b9d818c
FOL/NV/Margaris/Fol.lean
FOL.NV.T_21_1
[1345, 1]
[1370, 15]
apply IsDeduct.axiom_
case h1.h1.a.a.h1.h1.h1.h1 x y : VarName ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ (forall_ y (forall_ x (forall_ y (forall_ y (((eq_ y y).and_ (eq_ x y)).imp_ ((eq_ y x).iff_ (eq_ y y)))))))
case h1.h1.a.a.h1.h1.h1.h1.a x y : VarName ⊢ IsAxiom (forall_ y (forall_ x (forall_ y (forall_ y (((eq_ y y).and_ (eq_ x y)).imp_ ((eq_ y x).iff_ (eq_ y y)))))))
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h1.h1.a.a.h1.h1.h1.h1 x y : VarName ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ (forall_ y (forall_ x (forall_ y (forall_ y (((eq_ y y).and_ (eq_ x y)).imp_ ((eq_ y x).iff_ (eq_ y y))))))) TACTIC:
https://github.com/pthomas505/FOL.git
097a4abea51b641d144539b9a0f7516f3b9d818c
FOL/NV/Margaris/Fol.lean
FOL.NV.T_21_1
[1345, 1]
[1370, 15]
exact IsAxiom.eq_2_eq_ y x y y
case h1.h1.a.a.h1.h1.h1.h1.a x y : VarName ⊢ IsAxiom (forall_ y (forall_ x (forall_ y (forall_ y (((eq_ y y).and_ (eq_ x y)).imp_ ((eq_ y x).iff_ (eq_ y y)))))))
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h1.h1.a.a.h1.h1.h1.h1.a x y : VarName ⊢ IsAxiom (forall_ y (forall_ x (forall_ y (forall_ y (((eq_ y y).and_ (eq_ x y)).imp_ ((eq_ y x).iff_ (eq_ y y))))))) TACTIC:
https://github.com/pthomas505/FOL.git
097a4abea51b641d144539b9a0f7516f3b9d818c
FOL/NV/Margaris/Fol.lean
FOL.NV.T_21_1
[1345, 1]
[1370, 15]
apply specId y
case h1.h1.a x y : VarName ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ (eq_ y y)
case h1.h1.a.h1 x y : VarName ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ (forall_ y (eq_ y y))
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h1.h1.a x y : VarName ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ (eq_ y y) TACTIC:
https://github.com/pthomas505/FOL.git
097a4abea51b641d144539b9a0f7516f3b9d818c
FOL/NV/Margaris/Fol.lean
FOL.NV.T_21_1
[1345, 1]
[1370, 15]
apply IsDeduct.axiom_
case h1.h1.a.h1 x y : VarName ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ (forall_ y (eq_ y y))
case h1.h1.a.h1.a x y : VarName ⊢ IsAxiom (forall_ y (eq_ y y))
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h1.h1.a.h1 x y : VarName ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ (forall_ y (eq_ y y)) TACTIC:
https://github.com/pthomas505/FOL.git
097a4abea51b641d144539b9a0f7516f3b9d818c
FOL/NV/Margaris/Fol.lean
FOL.NV.T_21_1
[1345, 1]
[1370, 15]
exact IsAxiom.eq_1_ y
case h1.h1.a.h1.a x y : VarName ⊢ IsAxiom (forall_ y (eq_ y y))
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h1.h1.a.h1.a x y : VarName ⊢ IsAxiom (forall_ y (eq_ y y)) TACTIC:
https://github.com/pthomas505/FOL.git
097a4abea51b641d144539b9a0f7516f3b9d818c
FOL/NV/Margaris/Fol.lean
FOL.NV.T_21_1
[1345, 1]
[1370, 15]
intro H a1
case h1.h2 x y : VarName ⊢ ∀ H ∈ ∅, ¬isFreeIn y H
case h1.h2 x y : VarName H : Formula a1 : H ∈ ∅ ⊢ ¬isFreeIn y H
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h1.h2 x y : VarName ⊢ ∀ H ∈ ∅, ¬isFreeIn y H TACTIC:
https://github.com/pthomas505/FOL.git
097a4abea51b641d144539b9a0f7516f3b9d818c
FOL/NV/Margaris/Fol.lean
FOL.NV.T_21_1
[1345, 1]
[1370, 15]
simp at a1
case h1.h2 x y : VarName H : Formula a1 : H ∈ ∅ ⊢ ¬isFreeIn y H
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h1.h2 x y : VarName H : Formula a1 : H ∈ ∅ ⊢ ¬isFreeIn y H TACTIC:
https://github.com/pthomas505/FOL.git
097a4abea51b641d144539b9a0f7516f3b9d818c
FOL/NV/Margaris/Fol.lean
FOL.NV.T_21_1
[1345, 1]
[1370, 15]
intro H a1
case h2 x y : VarName ⊢ ∀ H ∈ ∅, ¬isFreeIn x H
case h2 x y : VarName H : Formula a1 : H ∈ ∅ ⊢ ¬isFreeIn x H
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h2 x y : VarName ⊢ ∀ H ∈ ∅, ¬isFreeIn x H TACTIC:
https://github.com/pthomas505/FOL.git
097a4abea51b641d144539b9a0f7516f3b9d818c
FOL/NV/Margaris/Fol.lean
FOL.NV.T_21_1
[1345, 1]
[1370, 15]
simp at a1
case h2 x y : VarName H : Formula a1 : H ∈ ∅ ⊢ ¬isFreeIn x H
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h2 x y : VarName H : Formula a1 : H ∈ ∅ ⊢ ¬isFreeIn x H TACTIC:
https://github.com/pthomas505/FOL.git
097a4abea51b641d144539b9a0f7516f3b9d818c
FOL/NV/Margaris/Fol.lean
FOL.NV.T_21_2
[1373, 1]
[1401, 15]
apply generalization
x y z : VarName ⊢ IsProof (forall_ x (forall_ y (forall_ z (((eq_ x y).and_ (eq_ y z)).imp_ (eq_ x z)))))
case h1 x y z : VarName ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ (forall_ y (forall_ z (((eq_ x y).and_ (eq_ y z)).imp_ (eq_ x z)))) case h2 x y z : VarName ⊢ ∀ H ∈ ∅, ¬isFreeIn x H
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: x y z : VarName ⊢ IsProof (forall_ x (forall_ y (forall_ z (((eq_ x y).and_ (eq_ y z)).imp_ (eq_ x z))))) TACTIC:
https://github.com/pthomas505/FOL.git
097a4abea51b641d144539b9a0f7516f3b9d818c
FOL/NV/Margaris/Fol.lean
FOL.NV.T_21_2
[1373, 1]
[1401, 15]
apply generalization
case h1 x y z : VarName ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ (forall_ y (forall_ z (((eq_ x y).and_ (eq_ y z)).imp_ (eq_ x z))))
case h1.h1 x y z : VarName ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ (forall_ z (((eq_ x y).and_ (eq_ y z)).imp_ (eq_ x z))) case h1.h2 x y z : VarName ⊢ ∀ H ∈ ∅, ¬isFreeIn y H
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h1 x y z : VarName ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ (forall_ y (forall_ z (((eq_ x y).and_ (eq_ y z)).imp_ (eq_ x z)))) TACTIC:
https://github.com/pthomas505/FOL.git
097a4abea51b641d144539b9a0f7516f3b9d818c
FOL/NV/Margaris/Fol.lean
FOL.NV.T_21_2
[1373, 1]
[1401, 15]
apply generalization
case h1.h1 x y z : VarName ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ (forall_ z (((eq_ x y).and_ (eq_ y z)).imp_ (eq_ x z)))
case h1.h1.h1 x y z : VarName ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ (((eq_ x y).and_ (eq_ y z)).imp_ (eq_ x z)) case h1.h1.h2 x y z : VarName ⊢ ∀ H ∈ ∅, ¬isFreeIn z H
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h1.h1 x y z : VarName ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ (forall_ z (((eq_ x y).and_ (eq_ y z)).imp_ (eq_ x z))) TACTIC:
https://github.com/pthomas505/FOL.git
097a4abea51b641d144539b9a0f7516f3b9d818c
FOL/NV/Margaris/Fol.lean
FOL.NV.T_21_2
[1373, 1]
[1401, 15]
apply IsDeduct.mp_ (eq_ z z)
case h1.h1.h1 x y z : VarName ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ (((eq_ x y).and_ (eq_ y z)).imp_ (eq_ x z))
case h1.h1.h1.a x y z : VarName ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ ((eq_ z z).imp_ (((eq_ x y).and_ (eq_ y z)).imp_ (eq_ x z))) case h1.h1.h1.a x y z : VarName ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ (eq_ z z)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h1.h1.h1 x y z : VarName ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ (((eq_ x y).and_ (eq_ y z)).imp_ (eq_ x z)) TACTIC:
https://github.com/pthomas505/FOL.git
097a4abea51b641d144539b9a0f7516f3b9d818c
FOL/NV/Margaris/Fol.lean
FOL.NV.T_21_2
[1373, 1]
[1401, 15]
apply IsDeduct.mp_ (((eq_ x y).and_ (eq_ z z)).imp_ ((eq_ x z).iff_ (eq_ y z)))
case h1.h1.h1.a x y z : VarName ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ ((eq_ z z).imp_ (((eq_ x y).and_ (eq_ y z)).imp_ (eq_ x z)))
case h1.h1.h1.a.a x y z : VarName ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ ((((eq_ x y).and_ (eq_ z z)).imp_ ((eq_ x z).iff_ (eq_ y z))).imp_ ((eq_ z z).imp_ (((eq_ x y).and_ (eq_ y z)).imp_ (eq_ x z)))) case h1.h1.h1.a.a x y z : VarName ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ (((eq_ x y).and_ (eq_ z z)).imp_ ((eq_ x z).iff_ (eq_ y z)))
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h1.h1.h1.a x y z : VarName ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ ((eq_ z z).imp_ (((eq_ x y).and_ (eq_ y z)).imp_ (eq_ x z))) TACTIC:
https://github.com/pthomas505/FOL.git
097a4abea51b641d144539b9a0f7516f3b9d818c
FOL/NV/Margaris/Fol.lean
FOL.NV.T_21_2
[1373, 1]
[1401, 15]
simp only [def_iff_]
case h1.h1.h1.a.a x y z : VarName ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ ((((eq_ x y).and_ (eq_ z z)).imp_ ((eq_ x z).iff_ (eq_ y z))).imp_ ((eq_ z z).imp_ (((eq_ x y).and_ (eq_ y z)).imp_ (eq_ x z))))
case h1.h1.h1.a.a x y z : VarName ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ ((((eq_ x y).and_ (eq_ z z)).imp_ (((eq_ x z).imp_ (eq_ y z)).and_ ((eq_ y z).imp_ (eq_ x z)))).imp_ ((eq_ z z).imp_ (((eq_ x y).and_ (eq_ y z)).imp_ (eq_ x z))))
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h1.h1.h1.a.a x y z : VarName ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ ((((eq_ x y).and_ (eq_ z z)).imp_ ((eq_ x z).iff_ (eq_ y z))).imp_ ((eq_ z z).imp_ (((eq_ x y).and_ (eq_ y z)).imp_ (eq_ x z)))) TACTIC:
https://github.com/pthomas505/FOL.git
097a4abea51b641d144539b9a0f7516f3b9d818c
FOL/NV/Margaris/Fol.lean
FOL.NV.T_21_2
[1373, 1]
[1401, 15]
simp only [def_and_]
case h1.h1.h1.a.a x y z : VarName ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ ((((eq_ x y).and_ (eq_ z z)).imp_ (((eq_ x z).imp_ (eq_ y z)).and_ ((eq_ y z).imp_ (eq_ x z)))).imp_ ((eq_ z z).imp_ (((eq_ x y).and_ (eq_ y z)).imp_ (eq_ x z))))
case h1.h1.h1.a.a x y z : VarName ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ ((((eq_ x y).imp_ (eq_ z z).not_).not_.imp_ (((eq_ x z).imp_ (eq_ y z)).imp_ ((eq_ y z).imp_ (eq_ x z)).not_).not_).imp_ ((eq_ z z).imp_ (((eq_ x y).imp_ (eq_ y z).not_).not_.imp_ (eq_ x z))))
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h1.h1.h1.a.a x y z : VarName ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ ((((eq_ x y).and_ (eq_ z z)).imp_ (((eq_ x z).imp_ (eq_ y z)).and_ ((eq_ y z).imp_ (eq_ x z)))).imp_ ((eq_ z z).imp_ (((eq_ x y).and_ (eq_ y z)).imp_ (eq_ x z)))) TACTIC:
https://github.com/pthomas505/FOL.git
097a4abea51b641d144539b9a0f7516f3b9d818c
FOL/NV/Margaris/Fol.lean
FOL.NV.T_21_2
[1373, 1]
[1401, 15]
SC
case h1.h1.h1.a.a x y z : VarName ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ ((((eq_ x y).imp_ (eq_ z z).not_).not_.imp_ (((eq_ x z).imp_ (eq_ y z)).imp_ ((eq_ y z).imp_ (eq_ x z)).not_).not_).imp_ ((eq_ z z).imp_ (((eq_ x y).imp_ (eq_ y z).not_).not_.imp_ (eq_ x z))))
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h1.h1.h1.a.a x y z : VarName ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ ((((eq_ x y).imp_ (eq_ z z).not_).not_.imp_ (((eq_ x z).imp_ (eq_ y z)).imp_ ((eq_ y z).imp_ (eq_ x z)).not_).not_).imp_ ((eq_ z z).imp_ (((eq_ x y).imp_ (eq_ y z).not_).not_.imp_ (eq_ x z))))...
https://github.com/pthomas505/FOL.git
097a4abea51b641d144539b9a0f7516f3b9d818c
FOL/NV/Margaris/Fol.lean
FOL.NV.T_21_2
[1373, 1]
[1401, 15]
apply specId z
case h1.h1.h1.a.a x y z : VarName ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ (((eq_ x y).and_ (eq_ z z)).imp_ ((eq_ x z).iff_ (eq_ y z)))
case h1.h1.h1.a.a.h1 x y z : VarName ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ (forall_ z (((eq_ x y).and_ (eq_ z z)).imp_ ((eq_ x z).iff_ (eq_ y z))))
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h1.h1.h1.a.a x y z : VarName ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ (((eq_ x y).and_ (eq_ z z)).imp_ ((eq_ x z).iff_ (eq_ y z))) TACTIC:
https://github.com/pthomas505/FOL.git
097a4abea51b641d144539b9a0f7516f3b9d818c
FOL/NV/Margaris/Fol.lean
FOL.NV.T_21_2
[1373, 1]
[1401, 15]
apply specId y
case h1.h1.h1.a.a.h1 x y z : VarName ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ (forall_ z (((eq_ x y).and_ (eq_ z z)).imp_ ((eq_ x z).iff_ (eq_ y z))))
case h1.h1.h1.a.a.h1.h1 x y z : VarName ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ (forall_ y (forall_ z (((eq_ x y).and_ (eq_ z z)).imp_ ((eq_ x z).iff_ (eq_ y z)))))
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h1.h1.h1.a.a.h1 x y z : VarName ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ (forall_ z (((eq_ x y).and_ (eq_ z z)).imp_ ((eq_ x z).iff_ (eq_ y z)))) TACTIC:
https://github.com/pthomas505/FOL.git
097a4abea51b641d144539b9a0f7516f3b9d818c
FOL/NV/Margaris/Fol.lean
FOL.NV.T_21_2
[1373, 1]
[1401, 15]
apply specId z
case h1.h1.h1.a.a.h1.h1 x y z : VarName ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ (forall_ y (forall_ z (((eq_ x y).and_ (eq_ z z)).imp_ ((eq_ x z).iff_ (eq_ y z)))))
case h1.h1.h1.a.a.h1.h1.h1 x y z : VarName ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ (forall_ z (forall_ y (forall_ z (((eq_ x y).and_ (eq_ z z)).imp_ ((eq_ x z).iff_ (eq_ y z))))))
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h1.h1.h1.a.a.h1.h1 x y z : VarName ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ (forall_ y (forall_ z (((eq_ x y).and_ (eq_ z z)).imp_ ((eq_ x z).iff_ (eq_ y z))))) TACTIC:
https://github.com/pthomas505/FOL.git
097a4abea51b641d144539b9a0f7516f3b9d818c
FOL/NV/Margaris/Fol.lean
FOL.NV.T_21_2
[1373, 1]
[1401, 15]
apply specId x
case h1.h1.h1.a.a.h1.h1.h1 x y z : VarName ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ (forall_ z (forall_ y (forall_ z (((eq_ x y).and_ (eq_ z z)).imp_ ((eq_ x z).iff_ (eq_ y z))))))
case h1.h1.h1.a.a.h1.h1.h1.h1 x y z : VarName ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ (forall_ x (forall_ z (forall_ y (forall_ z (((eq_ x y).and_ (eq_ z z)).imp_ ((eq_ x z).iff_ (eq_ y z)))))))
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h1.h1.h1.a.a.h1.h1.h1 x y z : VarName ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ (forall_ z (forall_ y (forall_ z (((eq_ x y).and_ (eq_ z z)).imp_ ((eq_ x z).iff_ (eq_ y z)))))) TACTIC:
https://github.com/pthomas505/FOL.git
097a4abea51b641d144539b9a0f7516f3b9d818c
FOL/NV/Margaris/Fol.lean
FOL.NV.T_21_2
[1373, 1]
[1401, 15]
apply IsDeduct.axiom_
case h1.h1.h1.a.a.h1.h1.h1.h1 x y z : VarName ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ (forall_ x (forall_ z (forall_ y (forall_ z (((eq_ x y).and_ (eq_ z z)).imp_ ((eq_ x z).iff_ (eq_ y z)))))))
case h1.h1.h1.a.a.h1.h1.h1.h1.a x y z : VarName ⊢ IsAxiom (forall_ x (forall_ z (forall_ y (forall_ z (((eq_ x y).and_ (eq_ z z)).imp_ ((eq_ x z).iff_ (eq_ y z)))))))
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h1.h1.h1.a.a.h1.h1.h1.h1 x y z : VarName ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ (forall_ x (forall_ z (forall_ y (forall_ z (((eq_ x y).and_ (eq_ z z)).imp_ ((eq_ x z).iff_ (eq_ y z))))))) TACTIC:
https://github.com/pthomas505/FOL.git
097a4abea51b641d144539b9a0f7516f3b9d818c
FOL/NV/Margaris/Fol.lean
FOL.NV.T_21_2
[1373, 1]
[1401, 15]
exact IsAxiom.eq_2_eq_ x z y z
case h1.h1.h1.a.a.h1.h1.h1.h1.a x y z : VarName ⊢ IsAxiom (forall_ x (forall_ z (forall_ y (forall_ z (((eq_ x y).and_ (eq_ z z)).imp_ ((eq_ x z).iff_ (eq_ y z)))))))
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h1.h1.h1.a.a.h1.h1.h1.h1.a x y z : VarName ⊢ IsAxiom (forall_ x (forall_ z (forall_ y (forall_ z (((eq_ x y).and_ (eq_ z z)).imp_ ((eq_ x z).iff_ (eq_ y z))))))) TACTIC:
https://github.com/pthomas505/FOL.git
097a4abea51b641d144539b9a0f7516f3b9d818c
FOL/NV/Margaris/Fol.lean
FOL.NV.T_21_2
[1373, 1]
[1401, 15]
apply specId z
case h1.h1.h1.a x y z : VarName ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ (eq_ z z)
case h1.h1.h1.a.h1 x y z : VarName ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ (forall_ z (eq_ z z))
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h1.h1.h1.a x y z : VarName ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ (eq_ z z) TACTIC:
https://github.com/pthomas505/FOL.git
097a4abea51b641d144539b9a0f7516f3b9d818c
FOL/NV/Margaris/Fol.lean
FOL.NV.T_21_2
[1373, 1]
[1401, 15]
apply IsDeduct.axiom_
case h1.h1.h1.a.h1 x y z : VarName ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ (forall_ z (eq_ z z))
case h1.h1.h1.a.h1.a x y z : VarName ⊢ IsAxiom (forall_ z (eq_ z z))
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h1.h1.h1.a.h1 x y z : VarName ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ (forall_ z (eq_ z z)) TACTIC:
https://github.com/pthomas505/FOL.git
097a4abea51b641d144539b9a0f7516f3b9d818c
FOL/NV/Margaris/Fol.lean
FOL.NV.T_21_2
[1373, 1]
[1401, 15]
exact IsAxiom.eq_1_ z
case h1.h1.h1.a.h1.a x y z : VarName ⊢ IsAxiom (forall_ z (eq_ z z))
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h1.h1.h1.a.h1.a x y z : VarName ⊢ IsAxiom (forall_ z (eq_ z z)) TACTIC:
https://github.com/pthomas505/FOL.git
097a4abea51b641d144539b9a0f7516f3b9d818c
FOL/NV/Margaris/Fol.lean
FOL.NV.T_21_2
[1373, 1]
[1401, 15]
intro H a1
case h1.h1.h2 x y z : VarName ⊢ ∀ H ∈ ∅, ¬isFreeIn z H
case h1.h1.h2 x y z : VarName H : Formula a1 : H ∈ ∅ ⊢ ¬isFreeIn z H
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h1.h1.h2 x y z : VarName ⊢ ∀ H ∈ ∅, ¬isFreeIn z H TACTIC:
https://github.com/pthomas505/FOL.git
097a4abea51b641d144539b9a0f7516f3b9d818c
FOL/NV/Margaris/Fol.lean
FOL.NV.T_21_2
[1373, 1]
[1401, 15]
simp at a1
case h1.h1.h2 x y z : VarName H : Formula a1 : H ∈ ∅ ⊢ ¬isFreeIn z H
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h1.h1.h2 x y z : VarName H : Formula a1 : H ∈ ∅ ⊢ ¬isFreeIn z H TACTIC:
https://github.com/pthomas505/FOL.git
097a4abea51b641d144539b9a0f7516f3b9d818c
FOL/NV/Margaris/Fol.lean
FOL.NV.T_21_2
[1373, 1]
[1401, 15]
intro H a1
case h1.h2 x y z : VarName ⊢ ∀ H ∈ ∅, ¬isFreeIn y H
case h1.h2 x y z : VarName H : Formula a1 : H ∈ ∅ ⊢ ¬isFreeIn y H
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h1.h2 x y z : VarName ⊢ ∀ H ∈ ∅, ¬isFreeIn y H TACTIC:
https://github.com/pthomas505/FOL.git
097a4abea51b641d144539b9a0f7516f3b9d818c
FOL/NV/Margaris/Fol.lean
FOL.NV.T_21_2
[1373, 1]
[1401, 15]
simp at a1
case h1.h2 x y z : VarName H : Formula a1 : H ∈ ∅ ⊢ ¬isFreeIn y H
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h1.h2 x y z : VarName H : Formula a1 : H ∈ ∅ ⊢ ¬isFreeIn y H TACTIC:
https://github.com/pthomas505/FOL.git
097a4abea51b641d144539b9a0f7516f3b9d818c
FOL/NV/Margaris/Fol.lean
FOL.NV.T_21_2
[1373, 1]
[1401, 15]
intro H a1
case h2 x y z : VarName ⊢ ∀ H ∈ ∅, ¬isFreeIn x H
case h2 x y z : VarName H : Formula a1 : H ∈ ∅ ⊢ ¬isFreeIn x H
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h2 x y z : VarName ⊢ ∀ H ∈ ∅, ¬isFreeIn x H TACTIC:
https://github.com/pthomas505/FOL.git
097a4abea51b641d144539b9a0f7516f3b9d818c
FOL/NV/Margaris/Fol.lean
FOL.NV.T_21_2
[1373, 1]
[1401, 15]
simp at a1
case h2 x y z : VarName H : Formula a1 : H ∈ ∅ ⊢ ¬isFreeIn x H
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h2 x y z : VarName H : Formula a1 : H ∈ ∅ ⊢ ¬isFreeIn x H TACTIC:
https://github.com/pthomas505/FOL.git
097a4abea51b641d144539b9a0f7516f3b9d818c
FOL/NV/Margaris/Fol.lean
FOL.NV.T_21_8
[1404, 1]
[1543, 10]
induction h1
P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName h1 : IsReplOfVarInFormula r s P_r P_s h2 : ¬isBoundIn r P_r h3 : ¬isBoundIn s P_r ⊢ IsProof ((eq_ r s).imp_ (P_r.iff_ P_s))
case pred_const_ P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name✝ : PredName n✝ : ℕ args_u✝ args_v✝ : Fin n✝ → VarName a✝ : ∀ (i : Fin n✝), args_u✝ i = args_v✝ i ∨ args_u✝ i = r ∧ args_v✝ i = s h2 : ¬isBoundIn r (pred_const_ name✝ (List.ofFn args_u✝)) h3 : ¬isBoundIn s (pred_const_ name✝ (List.ofFn args_u✝)) ⊢ IsProof ((eq_ r s)....
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName h1 : IsReplOfVarInFormula r s P_r P_s h2 : ¬isBoundIn r P_r h3 : ¬isBoundIn s P_r ⊢ IsProof ((eq_ r s).imp_ (P_r.iff_ P_s)) TACTIC:
https://github.com/pthomas505/FOL.git
097a4abea51b641d144539b9a0f7516f3b9d818c
FOL/NV/Margaris/Fol.lean
FOL.NV.T_21_8
[1404, 1]
[1543, 10]
case true_ => simp only [def_iff_] simp only [def_and_] SC
P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName h2 : ¬isBoundIn r true_ h3 : ¬isBoundIn s true_ ⊢ IsProof ((eq_ r s).imp_ (true_.iff_ true_))
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName h2 : ¬isBoundIn r true_ h3 : ¬isBoundIn s true_ ⊢ IsProof ((eq_ r s).imp_ (true_.iff_ true_)) TACTIC:
https://github.com/pthomas505/FOL.git
097a4abea51b641d144539b9a0f7516f3b9d818c
FOL/NV/Margaris/Fol.lean
FOL.NV.T_21_8
[1404, 1]
[1543, 10]
all_goals sorry
case pred_var_ P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name✝ : PredName n✝ : ℕ args_u✝ args_v✝ : Fin n✝ → VarName a✝ : ∀ (i : Fin n✝), args_u✝ i = args_v✝ i ∨ args_u✝ i = r ∧ args_v✝ i = s h2 : ¬isBoundIn r (pred_var_ name✝ (List.ofFn args_u✝)) h3 : ¬isBoundIn s (pred_var_ name✝ (List.ofFn args_u✝)) ⊢ IsProof ((eq_ r s).imp_ (...
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case pred_var_ P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name✝ : PredName n✝ : ℕ args_u✝ args_v✝ : Fin n✝ → VarName a✝ : ∀ (i : Fin n✝), args_u✝ i = args_v✝ i ∨ args_u✝ i = r ∧ args_v✝ i = s h2 : ¬isBoundIn r (pred_var_ name✝ (List.ofFn args_u✝)) h3 : ¬isBoundIn s (pre...
https://github.com/pthomas505/FOL.git
097a4abea51b641d144539b9a0f7516f3b9d818c
FOL/NV/Margaris/Fol.lean
FOL.NV.T_21_8
[1404, 1]
[1543, 10]
simp only [def_iff_]
P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName h2 : ¬isBoundIn r true_ h3 : ¬isBoundIn s true_ ⊢ IsProof ((eq_ r s).imp_ (true_.iff_ true_))
P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName h2 : ¬isBoundIn r true_ h3 : ¬isBoundIn s true_ ⊢ IsProof ((eq_ r s).imp_ ((true_.imp_ true_).and_ (true_.imp_ true_)))
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName h2 : ¬isBoundIn r true_ h3 : ¬isBoundIn s true_ ⊢ IsProof ((eq_ r s).imp_ (true_.iff_ true_)) TACTIC:
https://github.com/pthomas505/FOL.git
097a4abea51b641d144539b9a0f7516f3b9d818c
FOL/NV/Margaris/Fol.lean
FOL.NV.T_21_8
[1404, 1]
[1543, 10]
simp only [def_and_]
P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName h2 : ¬isBoundIn r true_ h3 : ¬isBoundIn s true_ ⊢ IsProof ((eq_ r s).imp_ ((true_.imp_ true_).and_ (true_.imp_ true_)))
P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName h2 : ¬isBoundIn r true_ h3 : ¬isBoundIn s true_ ⊢ IsProof ((eq_ r s).imp_ ((true_.imp_ true_).imp_ (true_.imp_ true_).not_).not_)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName h2 : ¬isBoundIn r true_ h3 : ¬isBoundIn s true_ ⊢ IsProof ((eq_ r s).imp_ ((true_.imp_ true_).and_ (true_.imp_ true_))) TACTIC:
https://github.com/pthomas505/FOL.git
097a4abea51b641d144539b9a0f7516f3b9d818c
FOL/NV/Margaris/Fol.lean
FOL.NV.T_21_8
[1404, 1]
[1543, 10]
SC
P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName h2 : ¬isBoundIn r true_ h3 : ¬isBoundIn s true_ ⊢ IsProof ((eq_ r s).imp_ ((true_.imp_ true_).imp_ (true_.imp_ true_).not_).not_)
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName h2 : ¬isBoundIn r true_ h3 : ¬isBoundIn s true_ ⊢ IsProof ((eq_ r s).imp_ ((true_.imp_ true_).imp_ (true_.imp_ true_).not_).not_) TACTIC:
https://github.com/pthomas505/FOL.git
097a4abea51b641d144539b9a0f7516f3b9d818c
FOL/NV/Margaris/Fol.lean
FOL.NV.T_21_8
[1404, 1]
[1543, 10]
apply IsDeduct.mp_ ((eq_ r s).imp_ ((pred_const_ name (List.ofFn args_u)).iff_ (pred_const_ name (List.ofFn args_v))))
P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName n : ℕ args_u args_v : Fin n → VarName h1_1 : ∀ (i : Fin n), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s h2 : ¬isBoundIn r (pred_const_ name (List.ofFn args_u)) h3 : ¬isBoundIn s (pred_const_ name (List.ofFn args_u)) ⊢ IsProof ((eq_ r s).imp_ ((pred_const_ name (List...
case a P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName n : ℕ args_u args_v : Fin n → VarName h1_1 : ∀ (i : Fin n), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s h2 : ¬isBoundIn r (pred_const_ name (List.ofFn args_u)) h3 : ¬isBoundIn s (pred_const_ name (List.ofFn args_u)) ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ (((eq_ r s).imp_ ((pred_co...
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName n : ℕ args_u args_v : Fin n → VarName h1_1 : ∀ (i : Fin n), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s h2 : ¬isBoundIn r (pred_const_ name (List.ofFn args_u)) h3 : ¬isBoundIn s (pred_const_ name (List.ofF...
https://github.com/pthomas505/FOL.git
097a4abea51b641d144539b9a0f7516f3b9d818c
FOL/NV/Margaris/Fol.lean
FOL.NV.T_21_8
[1404, 1]
[1543, 10]
SC
case a P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName n : ℕ args_u args_v : Fin n → VarName h1_1 : ∀ (i : Fin n), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s h2 : ¬isBoundIn r (pred_const_ name (List.ofFn args_u)) h3 : ¬isBoundIn s (pred_const_ name (List.ofFn args_u)) ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ (((eq_ r s).imp_ ((pred_co...
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case a P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName n : ℕ args_u args_v : Fin n → VarName h1_1 : ∀ (i : Fin n), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s h2 : ¬isBoundIn r (pred_const_ name (List.ofFn args_u)) h3 : ¬isBoundIn s (pred_const_ name (L...
https://github.com/pthomas505/FOL.git
097a4abea51b641d144539b9a0f7516f3b9d818c
FOL/NV/Margaris/Fol.lean
FOL.NV.T_21_8
[1404, 1]
[1543, 10]
apply IsDeduct.mp_ ((eq_ r s).imp_ (And_ (List.ofFn fun (i : Fin n) => eq_ (args_u i) (args_v i))))
case a P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName n : ℕ args_u args_v : Fin n → VarName h1_1 : ∀ (i : Fin n), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s h2 : ¬isBoundIn r (pred_const_ name (List.ofFn args_u)) h3 : ¬isBoundIn s (pred_const_ name (List.ofFn args_u)) ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ ((eq_ r s).imp_ ((pred_const_ ...
case a.a P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName n : ℕ args_u args_v : Fin n → VarName h1_1 : ∀ (i : Fin n), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s h2 : ¬isBoundIn r (pred_const_ name (List.ofFn args_u)) h3 : ¬isBoundIn s (pred_const_ name (List.ofFn args_u)) ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ (((eq_ r s).imp_ (And_ (...
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case a P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName n : ℕ args_u args_v : Fin n → VarName h1_1 : ∀ (i : Fin n), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s h2 : ¬isBoundIn r (pred_const_ name (List.ofFn args_u)) h3 : ¬isBoundIn s (pred_const_ name (L...
https://github.com/pthomas505/FOL.git
097a4abea51b641d144539b9a0f7516f3b9d818c
FOL/NV/Margaris/Fol.lean
FOL.NV.T_21_8
[1404, 1]
[1543, 10]
apply IsDeduct.mp_ ((And_ (List.ofFn fun (i : Fin n) => eq_ (args_u i) (args_v i))).imp_ ((pred_const_ name (List.ofFn args_u)).iff_ (pred_const_ name (List.ofFn args_v))))
case a.a P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName n : ℕ args_u args_v : Fin n → VarName h1_1 : ∀ (i : Fin n), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s h2 : ¬isBoundIn r (pred_const_ name (List.ofFn args_u)) h3 : ¬isBoundIn s (pred_const_ name (List.ofFn args_u)) ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ (((eq_ r s).imp_ (And_ (...
case a.a.a P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName n : ℕ args_u args_v : Fin n → VarName h1_1 : ∀ (i : Fin n), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s h2 : ¬isBoundIn r (pred_const_ name (List.ofFn args_u)) h3 : ¬isBoundIn s (pred_const_ name (List.ofFn args_u)) ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ (((And_ (List.ofFn fun...
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case a.a P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName n : ℕ args_u args_v : Fin n → VarName h1_1 : ∀ (i : Fin n), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s h2 : ¬isBoundIn r (pred_const_ name (List.ofFn args_u)) h3 : ¬isBoundIn s (pred_const_ name ...
https://github.com/pthomas505/FOL.git
097a4abea51b641d144539b9a0f7516f3b9d818c
FOL/NV/Margaris/Fol.lean
FOL.NV.T_21_8
[1404, 1]
[1543, 10]
simp only [def_iff_]
case a.a.a P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName n : ℕ args_u args_v : Fin n → VarName h1_1 : ∀ (i : Fin n), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s h2 : ¬isBoundIn r (pred_const_ name (List.ofFn args_u)) h3 : ¬isBoundIn s (pred_const_ name (List.ofFn args_u)) ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ (((And_ (List.ofFn fun...
case a.a.a P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName n : ℕ args_u args_v : Fin n → VarName h1_1 : ∀ (i : Fin n), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s h2 : ¬isBoundIn r (pred_const_ name (List.ofFn args_u)) h3 : ¬isBoundIn s (pred_const_ name (List.ofFn args_u)) ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ (((And_ (List.ofFn fun...
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case a.a.a P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName n : ℕ args_u args_v : Fin n → VarName h1_1 : ∀ (i : Fin n), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s h2 : ¬isBoundIn r (pred_const_ name (List.ofFn args_u)) h3 : ¬isBoundIn s (pred_const_ nam...
https://github.com/pthomas505/FOL.git
097a4abea51b641d144539b9a0f7516f3b9d818c
FOL/NV/Margaris/Fol.lean
FOL.NV.T_21_8
[1404, 1]
[1543, 10]
simp only [def_and_]
case a.a.a P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName n : ℕ args_u args_v : Fin n → VarName h1_1 : ∀ (i : Fin n), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s h2 : ¬isBoundIn r (pred_const_ name (List.ofFn args_u)) h3 : ¬isBoundIn s (pred_const_ name (List.ofFn args_u)) ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ (((And_ (List.ofFn fun...
case a.a.a P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName n : ℕ args_u args_v : Fin n → VarName h1_1 : ∀ (i : Fin n), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s h2 : ¬isBoundIn r (pred_const_ name (List.ofFn args_u)) h3 : ¬isBoundIn s (pred_const_ name (List.ofFn args_u)) ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ (((And_ (List.ofFn fun...
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case a.a.a P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName n : ℕ args_u args_v : Fin n → VarName h1_1 : ∀ (i : Fin n), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s h2 : ¬isBoundIn r (pred_const_ name (List.ofFn args_u)) h3 : ¬isBoundIn s (pred_const_ nam...
https://github.com/pthomas505/FOL.git
097a4abea51b641d144539b9a0f7516f3b9d818c
FOL/NV/Margaris/Fol.lean
FOL.NV.T_21_8
[1404, 1]
[1543, 10]
SC
case a.a.a P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName n : ℕ args_u args_v : Fin n → VarName h1_1 : ∀ (i : Fin n), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s h2 : ¬isBoundIn r (pred_const_ name (List.ofFn args_u)) h3 : ¬isBoundIn s (pred_const_ name (List.ofFn args_u)) ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ (((And_ (List.ofFn fun...
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case a.a.a P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName n : ℕ args_u args_v : Fin n → VarName h1_1 : ∀ (i : Fin n), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s h2 : ¬isBoundIn r (pred_const_ name (List.ofFn args_u)) h3 : ¬isBoundIn s (pred_const_ nam...
https://github.com/pthomas505/FOL.git
097a4abea51b641d144539b9a0f7516f3b9d818c
FOL/NV/Margaris/Fol.lean
FOL.NV.T_21_8
[1404, 1]
[1543, 10]
apply Forall_spec_id' (List.ofFn args_v)
case a.a.a P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName n : ℕ args_u args_v : Fin n → VarName h1_1 : ∀ (i : Fin n), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s h2 : ¬isBoundIn r (pred_const_ name (List.ofFn args_u)) h3 : ¬isBoundIn s (pred_const_ name (List.ofFn args_u)) ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ ((And_ (List.ofFn fun ...
case a.a.a.h1 P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName n : ℕ args_u args_v : Fin n → VarName h1_1 : ∀ (i : Fin n), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s h2 : ¬isBoundIn r (pred_const_ name (List.ofFn args_u)) h3 : ¬isBoundIn s (pred_const_ name (List.ofFn args_u)) ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ (Forall_ (List.ofFn...
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case a.a.a P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName n : ℕ args_u args_v : Fin n → VarName h1_1 : ∀ (i : Fin n), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s h2 : ¬isBoundIn r (pred_const_ name (List.ofFn args_u)) h3 : ¬isBoundIn s (pred_const_ nam...
https://github.com/pthomas505/FOL.git
097a4abea51b641d144539b9a0f7516f3b9d818c
FOL/NV/Margaris/Fol.lean
FOL.NV.T_21_8
[1404, 1]
[1543, 10]
apply Forall_spec_id' (List.ofFn args_u)
case a.a.a.h1 P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName n : ℕ args_u args_v : Fin n → VarName h1_1 : ∀ (i : Fin n), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s h2 : ¬isBoundIn r (pred_const_ name (List.ofFn args_u)) h3 : ¬isBoundIn s (pred_const_ name (List.ofFn args_u)) ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ (Forall_ (List.ofFn...
case a.a.a.h1.h1 P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName n : ℕ args_u args_v : Fin n → VarName h1_1 : ∀ (i : Fin n), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s h2 : ¬isBoundIn r (pred_const_ name (List.ofFn args_u)) h3 : ¬isBoundIn s (pred_const_ name (List.ofFn args_u)) ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ (Forall_ (List.o...
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case a.a.a.h1 P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName n : ℕ args_u args_v : Fin n → VarName h1_1 : ∀ (i : Fin n), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s h2 : ¬isBoundIn r (pred_const_ name (List.ofFn args_u)) h3 : ¬isBoundIn s (pred_const_ ...
https://github.com/pthomas505/FOL.git
097a4abea51b641d144539b9a0f7516f3b9d818c
FOL/NV/Margaris/Fol.lean
FOL.NV.T_21_8
[1404, 1]
[1543, 10]
apply IsDeduct.axiom_
case a.a.a.h1.h1 P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName n : ℕ args_u args_v : Fin n → VarName h1_1 : ∀ (i : Fin n), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s h2 : ¬isBoundIn r (pred_const_ name (List.ofFn args_u)) h3 : ¬isBoundIn s (pred_const_ name (List.ofFn args_u)) ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ (Forall_ (List.o...
case a.a.a.h1.h1.a P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName n : ℕ args_u args_v : Fin n → VarName h1_1 : ∀ (i : Fin n), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s h2 : ¬isBoundIn r (pred_const_ name (List.ofFn args_u)) h3 : ¬isBoundIn s (pred_const_ name (List.ofFn args_u)) ⊢ IsAxiom (Forall_ (List.of...
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case a.a.a.h1.h1 P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName n : ℕ args_u args_v : Fin n → VarName h1_1 : ∀ (i : Fin n), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s h2 : ¬isBoundIn r (pred_const_ name (List.ofFn args_u)) h3 : ¬isBoundIn s (pred_cons...
https://github.com/pthomas505/FOL.git
097a4abea51b641d144539b9a0f7516f3b9d818c
FOL/NV/Margaris/Fol.lean
FOL.NV.T_21_8
[1404, 1]
[1543, 10]
exact IsAxiom.eq_2_pred_const_ name n args_u args_v
case a.a.a.h1.h1.a P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName n : ℕ args_u args_v : Fin n → VarName h1_1 : ∀ (i : Fin n), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s h2 : ¬isBoundIn r (pred_const_ name (List.ofFn args_u)) h3 : ¬isBoundIn s (pred_const_ name (List.ofFn args_u)) ⊢ IsAxiom (Forall_ (List.of...
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case a.a.a.h1.h1.a P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName n : ℕ args_u args_v : Fin n → VarName h1_1 : ∀ (i : Fin n), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s h2 : ¬isBoundIn r (pred_const_ name (List.ofFn args_u)) h3 : ¬isBoundIn s (pred_co...
https://github.com/pthomas505/FOL.git
097a4abea51b641d144539b9a0f7516f3b9d818c
FOL/NV/Margaris/Fol.lean
FOL.NV.T_21_8
[1404, 1]
[1543, 10]
clear h2
case a.a P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName n : ℕ args_u args_v : Fin n → VarName h1_1 : ∀ (i : Fin n), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s h2 : ¬isBoundIn r (pred_const_ name (List.ofFn args_u)) h3 : ¬isBoundIn s (pred_const_ name (List.ofFn args_u)) ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ ((eq_ r s).imp_ (And_ (List....
case a.a P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName n : ℕ args_u args_v : Fin n → VarName h1_1 : ∀ (i : Fin n), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s h3 : ¬isBoundIn s (pred_const_ name (List.ofFn args_u)) ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ ((eq_ r s).imp_ (And_ (List.ofFn fun i => eq_ (args_u i) (args_v i))))
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case a.a P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName n : ℕ args_u args_v : Fin n → VarName h1_1 : ∀ (i : Fin n), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s h2 : ¬isBoundIn r (pred_const_ name (List.ofFn args_u)) h3 : ¬isBoundIn s (pred_const_ name ...
https://github.com/pthomas505/FOL.git
097a4abea51b641d144539b9a0f7516f3b9d818c
FOL/NV/Margaris/Fol.lean
FOL.NV.T_21_8
[1404, 1]
[1543, 10]
clear h3
case a.a P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName n : ℕ args_u args_v : Fin n → VarName h1_1 : ∀ (i : Fin n), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s h3 : ¬isBoundIn s (pred_const_ name (List.ofFn args_u)) ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ ((eq_ r s).imp_ (And_ (List.ofFn fun i => eq_ (args_u i) (args_v i))))
case a.a P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName n : ℕ args_u args_v : Fin n → VarName h1_1 : ∀ (i : Fin n), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ ((eq_ r s).imp_ (And_ (List.ofFn fun i => eq_ (args_u i) (args_v i))))
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case a.a P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName n : ℕ args_u args_v : Fin n → VarName h1_1 : ∀ (i : Fin n), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s h3 : ¬isBoundIn s (pred_const_ name (List.ofFn args_u)) ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ ((eq_ r s).imp_ (And_ (...
https://github.com/pthomas505/FOL.git
097a4abea51b641d144539b9a0f7516f3b9d818c
FOL/NV/Margaris/Fol.lean
FOL.NV.T_21_8
[1404, 1]
[1543, 10]
simp only [And_]
case a.a P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName n : ℕ args_u args_v : Fin n → VarName h1_1 : ∀ (i : Fin n), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ ((eq_ r s).imp_ (And_ (List.ofFn fun i => eq_ (args_u i) (args_v i))))
case a.a P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName n : ℕ args_u args_v : Fin n → VarName h1_1 : ∀ (i : Fin n), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ ((eq_ r s).imp_ (List.foldr and_ true_ (List.ofFn fun i => eq_ (args_u i) (args_v i))))
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case a.a P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName n : ℕ args_u args_v : Fin n → VarName h1_1 : ∀ (i : Fin n), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ ((eq_ r s).imp_ (And_ (List.ofFn fun i => eq_ (args_u i) (args_v i)))) TACTIC:
https://github.com/pthomas505/FOL.git
097a4abea51b641d144539b9a0f7516f3b9d818c
FOL/NV/Margaris/Fol.lean
FOL.NV.T_21_8
[1404, 1]
[1543, 10]
induction n
case a.a P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName n : ℕ args_u args_v : Fin n → VarName h1_1 : ∀ (i : Fin n), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ ((eq_ r s).imp_ (List.foldr and_ true_ (List.ofFn fun i => eq_ (args_u i) (args_v i))))
case a.a.zero P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName args_u args_v : Fin 0 → VarName h1_1 : ∀ (i : Fin 0), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ ((eq_ r s).imp_ (List.foldr and_ true_ (List.ofFn fun i => eq_ (args_u i) (args_v i)))) case a.a.succ P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name :...
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case a.a P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName n : ℕ args_u args_v : Fin n → VarName h1_1 : ∀ (i : Fin n), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ ((eq_ r s).imp_ (List.foldr and_ true_ (List.ofFn fun i => eq_ (args_u i) (args...
https://github.com/pthomas505/FOL.git
097a4abea51b641d144539b9a0f7516f3b9d818c
FOL/NV/Margaris/Fol.lean
FOL.NV.T_21_8
[1404, 1]
[1543, 10]
case _ => simp SC
P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName args_u args_v : Fin 0 → VarName h1_1 : ∀ (i : Fin 0), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ ((eq_ r s).imp_ (List.foldr and_ true_ (List.ofFn fun i => eq_ (args_u i) (args_v i))))
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName args_u args_v : Fin 0 → VarName h1_1 : ∀ (i : Fin 0), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ ((eq_ r s).imp_ (List.foldr and_ true_ (List.ofFn fun i => eq_ (args_u i) (args_v i)))) TACTIC...
https://github.com/pthomas505/FOL.git
097a4abea51b641d144539b9a0f7516f3b9d818c
FOL/NV/Margaris/Fol.lean
FOL.NV.T_21_8
[1404, 1]
[1543, 10]
simp
P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName args_u args_v : Fin 0 → VarName h1_1 : ∀ (i : Fin 0), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ ((eq_ r s).imp_ (List.foldr and_ true_ (List.ofFn fun i => eq_ (args_u i) (args_v i))))
P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName args_u args_v : Fin 0 → VarName h1_1 : ∀ (i : Fin 0), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ ((eq_ r s).imp_ true_)
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName args_u args_v : Fin 0 → VarName h1_1 : ∀ (i : Fin 0), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ ((eq_ r s).imp_ (List.foldr and_ true_ (List.ofFn fun i => eq_ (args_u i) (args_v i)))) TACTIC...
https://github.com/pthomas505/FOL.git
097a4abea51b641d144539b9a0f7516f3b9d818c
FOL/NV/Margaris/Fol.lean
FOL.NV.T_21_8
[1404, 1]
[1543, 10]
SC
P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName args_u args_v : Fin 0 → VarName h1_1 : ∀ (i : Fin 0), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ ((eq_ r s).imp_ true_)
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName args_u args_v : Fin 0 → VarName h1_1 : ∀ (i : Fin 0), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ ((eq_ r s).imp_ true_) TACTIC:
https://github.com/pthomas505/FOL.git
097a4abea51b641d144539b9a0f7516f3b9d818c
FOL/NV/Margaris/Fol.lean
FOL.NV.T_21_8
[1404, 1]
[1543, 10]
simp
P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName n : ℕ ih : ∀ (args_u args_v : Fin n → VarName), (∀ (i : Fin n), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s) → IsDeduct ∅ ((eq_ r s).imp_ (List.foldr and_ true_ (List.ofFn fun i => eq_ (args_u i) (args_v i)))) args_u args_v : Fin (n + 1) → VarName h1_1 :...
P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName n : ℕ ih : ∀ (args_u args_v : Fin n → VarName), (∀ (i : Fin n), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s) → IsDeduct ∅ ((eq_ r s).imp_ (List.foldr and_ true_ (List.ofFn fun i => eq_ (args_u i) (args_v i)))) args_u args_v : Fin (n + 1) → VarName h1_1 :...
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName n : ℕ ih : ∀ (args_u args_v : Fin n → VarName), (∀ (i : Fin n), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s) → IsDeduct ∅ ((eq_ r s).imp_ (List.foldr and_ true_ (List.ofFn fun i => eq_ (args_u ...
https://github.com/pthomas505/FOL.git
097a4abea51b641d144539b9a0f7516f3b9d818c
FOL/NV/Margaris/Fol.lean
FOL.NV.T_21_8
[1404, 1]
[1543, 10]
apply IsDeduct.mp_ ((eq_ r s).imp_ (List.foldr and_ true_ (List.ofFn fun (i : Fin n) => eq_ (args_u i.succ) (args_v i.succ))))
P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName n : ℕ ih : ∀ (args_u args_v : Fin n → VarName), (∀ (i : Fin n), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s) → IsDeduct ∅ ((eq_ r s).imp_ (List.foldr and_ true_ (List.ofFn fun i => eq_ (args_u i) (args_v i)))) args_u args_v : Fin (n + 1) → VarName h1_1 :...
case a P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName n : ℕ ih : ∀ (args_u args_v : Fin n → VarName), (∀ (i : Fin n), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s) → IsDeduct ∅ ((eq_ r s).imp_ (List.foldr and_ true_ (List.ofFn fun i => eq_ (args_u i) (args_v i)))) args_u args_v : Fin (n + 1) → VarName...
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName n : ℕ ih : ∀ (args_u args_v : Fin n → VarName), (∀ (i : Fin n), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s) → IsDeduct ∅ ((eq_ r s).imp_ (List.foldr and_ true_ (List.ofFn fun i => eq_ (args_u ...
https://github.com/pthomas505/FOL.git
097a4abea51b641d144539b9a0f7516f3b9d818c
FOL/NV/Margaris/Fol.lean
FOL.NV.T_21_8
[1404, 1]
[1543, 10]
apply IsDeduct.mp_ ((eq_ r s).imp_ (eq_ (args_u 0) (args_v 0)))
case a P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName n : ℕ ih : ∀ (args_u args_v : Fin n → VarName), (∀ (i : Fin n), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s) → IsDeduct ∅ ((eq_ r s).imp_ (List.foldr and_ true_ (List.ofFn fun i => eq_ (args_u i) (args_v i)))) args_u args_v : Fin (n + 1) → VarName...
case a.a P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName n : ℕ ih : ∀ (args_u args_v : Fin n → VarName), (∀ (i : Fin n), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s) → IsDeduct ∅ ((eq_ r s).imp_ (List.foldr and_ true_ (List.ofFn fun i => eq_ (args_u i) (args_v i)))) args_u args_v : Fin (n + 1) → VarNa...
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case a P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName n : ℕ ih : ∀ (args_u args_v : Fin n → VarName), (∀ (i : Fin n), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s) → IsDeduct ∅ ((eq_ r s).imp_ (List.foldr and_ true_ (List.ofFn fun i => eq_ (...
https://github.com/pthomas505/FOL.git
097a4abea51b641d144539b9a0f7516f3b9d818c
FOL/NV/Margaris/Fol.lean
FOL.NV.T_21_8
[1404, 1]
[1543, 10]
simp only [def_and_]
case a.a P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName n : ℕ ih : ∀ (args_u args_v : Fin n → VarName), (∀ (i : Fin n), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s) → IsDeduct ∅ ((eq_ r s).imp_ (List.foldr and_ true_ (List.ofFn fun i => eq_ (args_u i) (args_v i)))) args_u args_v : Fin (n + 1) → VarNa...
case a.a P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName n : ℕ ih : ∀ (args_u args_v : Fin n → VarName), (∀ (i : Fin n), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s) → IsDeduct ∅ ((eq_ r s).imp_ (List.foldr and_ true_ (List.ofFn fun i => eq_ (args_u i) (args_v i)))) args_u args_v : Fin (n + 1) → VarNa...
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case a.a P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName n : ℕ ih : ∀ (args_u args_v : Fin n → VarName), (∀ (i : Fin n), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s) → IsDeduct ∅ ((eq_ r s).imp_ (List.foldr and_ true_ (List.ofFn fun i => eq_...
https://github.com/pthomas505/FOL.git
097a4abea51b641d144539b9a0f7516f3b9d818c
FOL/NV/Margaris/Fol.lean
FOL.NV.T_21_8
[1404, 1]
[1543, 10]
SC
case a.a P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName n : ℕ ih : ∀ (args_u args_v : Fin n → VarName), (∀ (i : Fin n), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s) → IsDeduct ∅ ((eq_ r s).imp_ (List.foldr and_ true_ (List.ofFn fun i => eq_ (args_u i) (args_v i)))) args_u args_v : Fin (n + 1) → VarNa...
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case a.a P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName n : ℕ ih : ∀ (args_u args_v : Fin n → VarName), (∀ (i : Fin n), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s) → IsDeduct ∅ ((eq_ r s).imp_ (List.foldr and_ true_ (List.ofFn fun i => eq_...
https://github.com/pthomas505/FOL.git
097a4abea51b641d144539b9a0f7516f3b9d818c
FOL/NV/Margaris/Fol.lean
FOL.NV.T_21_8
[1404, 1]
[1543, 10]
specialize h1_1 0
case a.a P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName n : ℕ ih : ∀ (args_u args_v : Fin n → VarName), (∀ (i : Fin n), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s) → IsDeduct ∅ ((eq_ r s).imp_ (List.foldr and_ true_ (List.ofFn fun i => eq_ (args_u i) (args_v i)))) args_u args_v : Fin (n + 1) → VarNa...
case a.a P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName n : ℕ ih : ∀ (args_u args_v : Fin n → VarName), (∀ (i : Fin n), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s) → IsDeduct ∅ ((eq_ r s).imp_ (List.foldr and_ true_ (List.ofFn fun i => eq_ (args_u i) (args_v i)))) args_u args_v : Fin (n + 1) → VarNa...
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case a.a P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName n : ℕ ih : ∀ (args_u args_v : Fin n → VarName), (∀ (i : Fin n), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s) → IsDeduct ∅ ((eq_ r s).imp_ (List.foldr and_ true_ (List.ofFn fun i => eq_...
https://github.com/pthomas505/FOL.git
097a4abea51b641d144539b9a0f7516f3b9d818c
FOL/NV/Margaris/Fol.lean
FOL.NV.T_21_8
[1404, 1]
[1543, 10]
cases h1_1
case a.a P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName n : ℕ ih : ∀ (args_u args_v : Fin n → VarName), (∀ (i : Fin n), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s) → IsDeduct ∅ ((eq_ r s).imp_ (List.foldr and_ true_ (List.ofFn fun i => eq_ (args_u i) (args_v i)))) args_u args_v : Fin (n + 1) → VarNa...
case a.a.inl P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName n : ℕ ih : ∀ (args_u args_v : Fin n → VarName), (∀ (i : Fin n), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s) → IsDeduct ∅ ((eq_ r s).imp_ (List.foldr and_ true_ (List.ofFn fun i => eq_ (args_u i) (args_v i)))) args_u args_v : Fin (n + 1) → V...
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case a.a P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName n : ℕ ih : ∀ (args_u args_v : Fin n → VarName), (∀ (i : Fin n), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s) → IsDeduct ∅ ((eq_ r s).imp_ (List.foldr and_ true_ (List.ofFn fun i => eq_...
https://github.com/pthomas505/FOL.git
097a4abea51b641d144539b9a0f7516f3b9d818c
FOL/NV/Margaris/Fol.lean
FOL.NV.T_21_8
[1404, 1]
[1543, 10]
case _ c1 => apply IsDeduct.mp_ (eq_ (args_u 0) (args_v 0)) case _ => SC case _ => simp only [c1] apply specId (args_v 0) apply IsDeduct.axiom_ apply IsAxiom.eq_1_
P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName n : ℕ ih : ∀ (args_u args_v : Fin n → VarName), (∀ (i : Fin n), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s) → IsDeduct ∅ ((eq_ r s).imp_ (List.foldr and_ true_ (List.ofFn fun i => eq_ (args_u i) (args_v i)))) args_u args_v : Fin (n + 1) → VarName c1 : a...
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName n : ℕ ih : ∀ (args_u args_v : Fin n → VarName), (∀ (i : Fin n), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s) → IsDeduct ∅ ((eq_ r s).imp_ (List.foldr and_ true_ (List.ofFn fun i => eq_ (args_u ...
https://github.com/pthomas505/FOL.git
097a4abea51b641d144539b9a0f7516f3b9d818c
FOL/NV/Margaris/Fol.lean
FOL.NV.T_21_8
[1404, 1]
[1543, 10]
case _ c1 => cases c1 case _ c1_left c1_right => subst c1_left subst c1_right SC
P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName n : ℕ ih : ∀ (args_u args_v : Fin n → VarName), (∀ (i : Fin n), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s) → IsDeduct ∅ ((eq_ r s).imp_ (List.foldr and_ true_ (List.ofFn fun i => eq_ (args_u i) (args_v i)))) args_u args_v : Fin (n + 1) → VarName c1 : a...
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName n : ℕ ih : ∀ (args_u args_v : Fin n → VarName), (∀ (i : Fin n), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s) → IsDeduct ∅ ((eq_ r s).imp_ (List.foldr and_ true_ (List.ofFn fun i => eq_ (args_u ...
https://github.com/pthomas505/FOL.git
097a4abea51b641d144539b9a0f7516f3b9d818c
FOL/NV/Margaris/Fol.lean
FOL.NV.T_21_8
[1404, 1]
[1543, 10]
apply IsDeduct.mp_ (eq_ (args_u 0) (args_v 0))
P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName n : ℕ ih : ∀ (args_u args_v : Fin n → VarName), (∀ (i : Fin n), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s) → IsDeduct ∅ ((eq_ r s).imp_ (List.foldr and_ true_ (List.ofFn fun i => eq_ (args_u i) (args_v i)))) args_u args_v : Fin (n + 1) → VarName c1 : a...
case a P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName n : ℕ ih : ∀ (args_u args_v : Fin n → VarName), (∀ (i : Fin n), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s) → IsDeduct ∅ ((eq_ r s).imp_ (List.foldr and_ true_ (List.ofFn fun i => eq_ (args_u i) (args_v i)))) args_u args_v : Fin (n + 1) → VarName...
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName n : ℕ ih : ∀ (args_u args_v : Fin n → VarName), (∀ (i : Fin n), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s) → IsDeduct ∅ ((eq_ r s).imp_ (List.foldr and_ true_ (List.ofFn fun i => eq_ (args_u ...
https://github.com/pthomas505/FOL.git
097a4abea51b641d144539b9a0f7516f3b9d818c
FOL/NV/Margaris/Fol.lean
FOL.NV.T_21_8
[1404, 1]
[1543, 10]
case _ => SC
P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName n : ℕ ih : ∀ (args_u args_v : Fin n → VarName), (∀ (i : Fin n), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s) → IsDeduct ∅ ((eq_ r s).imp_ (List.foldr and_ true_ (List.ofFn fun i => eq_ (args_u i) (args_v i)))) args_u args_v : Fin (n + 1) → VarName c1 : a...
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName n : ℕ ih : ∀ (args_u args_v : Fin n → VarName), (∀ (i : Fin n), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s) → IsDeduct ∅ ((eq_ r s).imp_ (List.foldr and_ true_ (List.ofFn fun i => eq_ (args_u ...
https://github.com/pthomas505/FOL.git
097a4abea51b641d144539b9a0f7516f3b9d818c
FOL/NV/Margaris/Fol.lean
FOL.NV.T_21_8
[1404, 1]
[1543, 10]
case _ => simp only [c1] apply specId (args_v 0) apply IsDeduct.axiom_ apply IsAxiom.eq_1_
P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName n : ℕ ih : ∀ (args_u args_v : Fin n → VarName), (∀ (i : Fin n), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s) → IsDeduct ∅ ((eq_ r s).imp_ (List.foldr and_ true_ (List.ofFn fun i => eq_ (args_u i) (args_v i)))) args_u args_v : Fin (n + 1) → VarName c1 : a...
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName n : ℕ ih : ∀ (args_u args_v : Fin n → VarName), (∀ (i : Fin n), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s) → IsDeduct ∅ ((eq_ r s).imp_ (List.foldr and_ true_ (List.ofFn fun i => eq_ (args_u ...
https://github.com/pthomas505/FOL.git
097a4abea51b641d144539b9a0f7516f3b9d818c
FOL/NV/Margaris/Fol.lean
FOL.NV.T_21_8
[1404, 1]
[1543, 10]
SC
P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName n : ℕ ih : ∀ (args_u args_v : Fin n → VarName), (∀ (i : Fin n), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s) → IsDeduct ∅ ((eq_ r s).imp_ (List.foldr and_ true_ (List.ofFn fun i => eq_ (args_u i) (args_v i)))) args_u args_v : Fin (n + 1) → VarName c1 : a...
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName n : ℕ ih : ∀ (args_u args_v : Fin n → VarName), (∀ (i : Fin n), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s) → IsDeduct ∅ ((eq_ r s).imp_ (List.foldr and_ true_ (List.ofFn fun i => eq_ (args_u ...
https://github.com/pthomas505/FOL.git
097a4abea51b641d144539b9a0f7516f3b9d818c
FOL/NV/Margaris/Fol.lean
FOL.NV.T_21_8
[1404, 1]
[1543, 10]
simp only [c1]
P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName n : ℕ ih : ∀ (args_u args_v : Fin n → VarName), (∀ (i : Fin n), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s) → IsDeduct ∅ ((eq_ r s).imp_ (List.foldr and_ true_ (List.ofFn fun i => eq_ (args_u i) (args_v i)))) args_u args_v : Fin (n + 1) → VarName c1 : a...
P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName n : ℕ ih : ∀ (args_u args_v : Fin n → VarName), (∀ (i : Fin n), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s) → IsDeduct ∅ ((eq_ r s).imp_ (List.foldr and_ true_ (List.ofFn fun i => eq_ (args_u i) (args_v i)))) args_u args_v : Fin (n + 1) → VarName c1 : a...
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName n : ℕ ih : ∀ (args_u args_v : Fin n → VarName), (∀ (i : Fin n), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s) → IsDeduct ∅ ((eq_ r s).imp_ (List.foldr and_ true_ (List.ofFn fun i => eq_ (args_u ...
https://github.com/pthomas505/FOL.git
097a4abea51b641d144539b9a0f7516f3b9d818c
FOL/NV/Margaris/Fol.lean
FOL.NV.T_21_8
[1404, 1]
[1543, 10]
apply specId (args_v 0)
P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName n : ℕ ih : ∀ (args_u args_v : Fin n → VarName), (∀ (i : Fin n), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s) → IsDeduct ∅ ((eq_ r s).imp_ (List.foldr and_ true_ (List.ofFn fun i => eq_ (args_u i) (args_v i)))) args_u args_v : Fin (n + 1) → VarName c1 : a...
case h1 P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName n : ℕ ih : ∀ (args_u args_v : Fin n → VarName), (∀ (i : Fin n), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s) → IsDeduct ∅ ((eq_ r s).imp_ (List.foldr and_ true_ (List.ofFn fun i => eq_ (args_u i) (args_v i)))) args_u args_v : Fin (n + 1) → VarNam...
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName n : ℕ ih : ∀ (args_u args_v : Fin n → VarName), (∀ (i : Fin n), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s) → IsDeduct ∅ ((eq_ r s).imp_ (List.foldr and_ true_ (List.ofFn fun i => eq_ (args_u ...
https://github.com/pthomas505/FOL.git
097a4abea51b641d144539b9a0f7516f3b9d818c
FOL/NV/Margaris/Fol.lean
FOL.NV.T_21_8
[1404, 1]
[1543, 10]
apply IsDeduct.axiom_
case h1 P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName n : ℕ ih : ∀ (args_u args_v : Fin n → VarName), (∀ (i : Fin n), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s) → IsDeduct ∅ ((eq_ r s).imp_ (List.foldr and_ true_ (List.ofFn fun i => eq_ (args_u i) (args_v i)))) args_u args_v : Fin (n + 1) → VarNam...
case h1.a P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName n : ℕ ih : ∀ (args_u args_v : Fin n → VarName), (∀ (i : Fin n), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s) → IsDeduct ∅ ((eq_ r s).imp_ (List.foldr and_ true_ (List.ofFn fun i => eq_ (args_u i) (args_v i)))) args_u args_v : Fin (n + 1) → VarN...
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h1 P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName n : ℕ ih : ∀ (args_u args_v : Fin n → VarName), (∀ (i : Fin n), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s) → IsDeduct ∅ ((eq_ r s).imp_ (List.foldr and_ true_ (List.ofFn fun i => eq_ ...
https://github.com/pthomas505/FOL.git
097a4abea51b641d144539b9a0f7516f3b9d818c
FOL/NV/Margaris/Fol.lean
FOL.NV.T_21_8
[1404, 1]
[1543, 10]
apply IsAxiom.eq_1_
case h1.a P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName n : ℕ ih : ∀ (args_u args_v : Fin n → VarName), (∀ (i : Fin n), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s) → IsDeduct ∅ ((eq_ r s).imp_ (List.foldr and_ true_ (List.ofFn fun i => eq_ (args_u i) (args_v i)))) args_u args_v : Fin (n + 1) → VarN...
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case h1.a P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName n : ℕ ih : ∀ (args_u args_v : Fin n → VarName), (∀ (i : Fin n), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s) → IsDeduct ∅ ((eq_ r s).imp_ (List.foldr and_ true_ (List.ofFn fun i => eq...
https://github.com/pthomas505/FOL.git
097a4abea51b641d144539b9a0f7516f3b9d818c
FOL/NV/Margaris/Fol.lean
FOL.NV.T_21_8
[1404, 1]
[1543, 10]
cases c1
P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName n : ℕ ih : ∀ (args_u args_v : Fin n → VarName), (∀ (i : Fin n), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s) → IsDeduct ∅ ((eq_ r s).imp_ (List.foldr and_ true_ (List.ofFn fun i => eq_ (args_u i) (args_v i)))) args_u args_v : Fin (n + 1) → VarName c1 : a...
case intro P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName n : ℕ ih : ∀ (args_u args_v : Fin n → VarName), (∀ (i : Fin n), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s) → IsDeduct ∅ ((eq_ r s).imp_ (List.foldr and_ true_ (List.ofFn fun i => eq_ (args_u i) (args_v i)))) args_u args_v : Fin (n + 1) → Var...
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName n : ℕ ih : ∀ (args_u args_v : Fin n → VarName), (∀ (i : Fin n), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s) → IsDeduct ∅ ((eq_ r s).imp_ (List.foldr and_ true_ (List.ofFn fun i => eq_ (args_u ...
https://github.com/pthomas505/FOL.git
097a4abea51b641d144539b9a0f7516f3b9d818c
FOL/NV/Margaris/Fol.lean
FOL.NV.T_21_8
[1404, 1]
[1543, 10]
case _ c1_left c1_right => subst c1_left subst c1_right SC
P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName n : ℕ ih : ∀ (args_u args_v : Fin n → VarName), (∀ (i : Fin n), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s) → IsDeduct ∅ ((eq_ r s).imp_ (List.foldr and_ true_ (List.ofFn fun i => eq_ (args_u i) (args_v i)))) args_u args_v : Fin (n + 1) → VarName c1_lef...
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName n : ℕ ih : ∀ (args_u args_v : Fin n → VarName), (∀ (i : Fin n), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s) → IsDeduct ∅ ((eq_ r s).imp_ (List.foldr and_ true_ (List.ofFn fun i => eq_ (args_u ...
https://github.com/pthomas505/FOL.git
097a4abea51b641d144539b9a0f7516f3b9d818c
FOL/NV/Margaris/Fol.lean
FOL.NV.T_21_8
[1404, 1]
[1543, 10]
subst c1_left
P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName n : ℕ ih : ∀ (args_u args_v : Fin n → VarName), (∀ (i : Fin n), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s) → IsDeduct ∅ ((eq_ r s).imp_ (List.foldr and_ true_ (List.ofFn fun i => eq_ (args_u i) (args_v i)))) args_u args_v : Fin (n + 1) → VarName c1_lef...
P_r P_s : Formula s : VarName name : PredName n : ℕ args_u args_v : Fin (n + 1) → VarName c1_right : args_v 0 = s ih : ∀ (args_u_1 args_v : Fin n → VarName), (∀ (i : Fin n), args_u_1 i = args_v i ∨ args_u_1 i = args_u 0 ∧ args_v i = s) → IsDeduct ∅ ((eq_ (args_u 0) s).imp_ (List.foldr and_ true_ (List.ofFn ...
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName n : ℕ ih : ∀ (args_u args_v : Fin n → VarName), (∀ (i : Fin n), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s) → IsDeduct ∅ ((eq_ r s).imp_ (List.foldr and_ true_ (List.ofFn fun i => eq_ (args_u ...
https://github.com/pthomas505/FOL.git
097a4abea51b641d144539b9a0f7516f3b9d818c
FOL/NV/Margaris/Fol.lean
FOL.NV.T_21_8
[1404, 1]
[1543, 10]
subst c1_right
P_r P_s : Formula s : VarName name : PredName n : ℕ args_u args_v : Fin (n + 1) → VarName c1_right : args_v 0 = s ih : ∀ (args_u_1 args_v : Fin n → VarName), (∀ (i : Fin n), args_u_1 i = args_v i ∨ args_u_1 i = args_u 0 ∧ args_v i = s) → IsDeduct ∅ ((eq_ (args_u 0) s).imp_ (List.foldr and_ true_ (List.ofFn ...
P_r P_s : Formula name : PredName n : ℕ args_u args_v : Fin (n + 1) → VarName ih : ∀ (args_u_1 args_v_1 : Fin n → VarName), (∀ (i : Fin n), args_u_1 i = args_v_1 i ∨ args_u_1 i = args_u 0 ∧ args_v_1 i = args_v 0) → IsDeduct ∅ ((eq_ (args_u 0) (args_v 0)).imp_ (List.foldr and_ true_ (List.ofFn fun i ...
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: P_r P_s : Formula s : VarName name : PredName n : ℕ args_u args_v : Fin (n + 1) → VarName c1_right : args_v 0 = s ih : ∀ (args_u_1 args_v : Fin n → VarName), (∀ (i : Fin n), args_u_1 i = args_v i ∨ args_u_1 i = args_u 0 ∧ args_v i = s) → IsDeduct ...
https://github.com/pthomas505/FOL.git
097a4abea51b641d144539b9a0f7516f3b9d818c
FOL/NV/Margaris/Fol.lean
FOL.NV.T_21_8
[1404, 1]
[1543, 10]
SC
P_r P_s : Formula name : PredName n : ℕ args_u args_v : Fin (n + 1) → VarName ih : ∀ (args_u_1 args_v_1 : Fin n → VarName), (∀ (i : Fin n), args_u_1 i = args_v_1 i ∨ args_u_1 i = args_u 0 ∧ args_v_1 i = args_v 0) → IsDeduct ∅ ((eq_ (args_u 0) (args_v 0)).imp_ (List.foldr and_ true_ (List.ofFn fun i ...
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: P_r P_s : Formula name : PredName n : ℕ args_u args_v : Fin (n + 1) → VarName ih : ∀ (args_u_1 args_v_1 : Fin n → VarName), (∀ (i : Fin n), args_u_1 i = args_v_1 i ∨ args_u_1 i = args_u 0 ∧ args_v_1 i = args_v 0) → IsDeduct ∅ ((eq_ (args_u...
https://github.com/pthomas505/FOL.git
097a4abea51b641d144539b9a0f7516f3b9d818c
FOL/NV/Margaris/Fol.lean
FOL.NV.T_21_8
[1404, 1]
[1543, 10]
apply ih
case a P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName n : ℕ ih : ∀ (args_u args_v : Fin n → VarName), (∀ (i : Fin n), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s) → IsDeduct ∅ ((eq_ r s).imp_ (List.foldr and_ true_ (List.ofFn fun i => eq_ (args_u i) (args_v i)))) args_u args_v : Fin (n + 1) → VarName...
case a.h1_1 P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName n : ℕ ih : ∀ (args_u args_v : Fin n → VarName), (∀ (i : Fin n), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s) → IsDeduct ∅ ((eq_ r s).imp_ (List.foldr and_ true_ (List.ofFn fun i => eq_ (args_u i) (args_v i)))) args_u args_v : Fin (n + 1) → Va...
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case a P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName n : ℕ ih : ∀ (args_u args_v : Fin n → VarName), (∀ (i : Fin n), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s) → IsDeduct ∅ ((eq_ r s).imp_ (List.foldr and_ true_ (List.ofFn fun i => eq_ (...
https://github.com/pthomas505/FOL.git
097a4abea51b641d144539b9a0f7516f3b9d818c
FOL/NV/Margaris/Fol.lean
FOL.NV.T_21_8
[1404, 1]
[1543, 10]
intro i
case a.h1_1 P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName n : ℕ ih : ∀ (args_u args_v : Fin n → VarName), (∀ (i : Fin n), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s) → IsDeduct ∅ ((eq_ r s).imp_ (List.foldr and_ true_ (List.ofFn fun i => eq_ (args_u i) (args_v i)))) args_u args_v : Fin (n + 1) → Va...
case a.h1_1 P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName n : ℕ ih : ∀ (args_u args_v : Fin n → VarName), (∀ (i : Fin n), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s) → IsDeduct ∅ ((eq_ r s).imp_ (List.foldr and_ true_ (List.ofFn fun i => eq_ (args_u i) (args_v i)))) args_u args_v : Fin (n + 1) → Va...
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case a.h1_1 P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName n : ℕ ih : ∀ (args_u args_v : Fin n → VarName), (∀ (i : Fin n), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s) → IsDeduct ∅ ((eq_ r s).imp_ (List.foldr and_ true_ (List.ofFn fun i => ...
https://github.com/pthomas505/FOL.git
097a4abea51b641d144539b9a0f7516f3b9d818c
FOL/NV/Margaris/Fol.lean
FOL.NV.T_21_8
[1404, 1]
[1543, 10]
apply h1_1
case a.h1_1 P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName n : ℕ ih : ∀ (args_u args_v : Fin n → VarName), (∀ (i : Fin n), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s) → IsDeduct ∅ ((eq_ r s).imp_ (List.foldr and_ true_ (List.ofFn fun i => eq_ (args_u i) (args_v i)))) args_u args_v : Fin (n + 1) → Va...
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case a.h1_1 P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName name : PredName n : ℕ ih : ∀ (args_u args_v : Fin n → VarName), (∀ (i : Fin n), args_u i = args_v i ∨ args_u i = r ∧ args_v i = s) → IsDeduct ∅ ((eq_ r s).imp_ (List.foldr and_ true_ (List.ofFn fun i => ...
https://github.com/pthomas505/FOL.git
097a4abea51b641d144539b9a0f7516f3b9d818c
FOL/NV/Margaris/Fol.lean
FOL.NV.T_21_8
[1404, 1]
[1543, 10]
simp only [isBoundIn] at h2
P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName P_u P_v : Formula h1_1 : IsReplOfVarInFormula r s P_u P_v h1_ih : ¬isBoundIn r P_u → ¬isBoundIn s P_u → IsProof ((eq_ r s).imp_ (P_u.iff_ P_v)) h2 : ¬isBoundIn r P_u.not_ h3 : ¬isBoundIn s P_u.not_ ⊢ IsProof ((eq_ r s).imp_ (P_u.not_.iff_ P_v.not_))
P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName P_u P_v : Formula h1_1 : IsReplOfVarInFormula r s P_u P_v h1_ih : ¬isBoundIn r P_u → ¬isBoundIn s P_u → IsProof ((eq_ r s).imp_ (P_u.iff_ P_v)) h2 : ¬isBoundIn r P_u h3 : ¬isBoundIn s P_u.not_ ⊢ IsProof ((eq_ r s).imp_ (P_u.not_.iff_ P_v.not_))
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName P_u P_v : Formula h1_1 : IsReplOfVarInFormula r s P_u P_v h1_ih : ¬isBoundIn r P_u → ¬isBoundIn s P_u → IsProof ((eq_ r s).imp_ (P_u.iff_ P_v)) h2 : ¬isBoundIn r P_u.not_ h3 : ¬isBoundIn s P_u.not_ ⊢ IsProof ((eq_ r s).imp_ (P_...
https://github.com/pthomas505/FOL.git
097a4abea51b641d144539b9a0f7516f3b9d818c
FOL/NV/Margaris/Fol.lean
FOL.NV.T_21_8
[1404, 1]
[1543, 10]
simp only [isBoundIn] at h3
P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName P_u P_v : Formula h1_1 : IsReplOfVarInFormula r s P_u P_v h1_ih : ¬isBoundIn r P_u → ¬isBoundIn s P_u → IsProof ((eq_ r s).imp_ (P_u.iff_ P_v)) h2 : ¬isBoundIn r P_u h3 : ¬isBoundIn s P_u.not_ ⊢ IsProof ((eq_ r s).imp_ (P_u.not_.iff_ P_v.not_))
P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName P_u P_v : Formula h1_1 : IsReplOfVarInFormula r s P_u P_v h1_ih : ¬isBoundIn r P_u → ¬isBoundIn s P_u → IsProof ((eq_ r s).imp_ (P_u.iff_ P_v)) h2 : ¬isBoundIn r P_u h3 : ¬isBoundIn s P_u ⊢ IsProof ((eq_ r s).imp_ (P_u.not_.iff_ P_v.not_))
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName P_u P_v : Formula h1_1 : IsReplOfVarInFormula r s P_u P_v h1_ih : ¬isBoundIn r P_u → ¬isBoundIn s P_u → IsProof ((eq_ r s).imp_ (P_u.iff_ P_v)) h2 : ¬isBoundIn r P_u h3 : ¬isBoundIn s P_u.not_ ⊢ IsProof ((eq_ r s).imp_ (P_u.not...
https://github.com/pthomas505/FOL.git
097a4abea51b641d144539b9a0f7516f3b9d818c
FOL/NV/Margaris/Fol.lean
FOL.NV.T_21_8
[1404, 1]
[1543, 10]
specialize h1_ih h2 h3
P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName P_u P_v : Formula h1_1 : IsReplOfVarInFormula r s P_u P_v h1_ih : ¬isBoundIn r P_u → ¬isBoundIn s P_u → IsProof ((eq_ r s).imp_ (P_u.iff_ P_v)) h2 : ¬isBoundIn r P_u h3 : ¬isBoundIn s P_u ⊢ IsProof ((eq_ r s).imp_ (P_u.not_.iff_ P_v.not_))
P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName P_u P_v : Formula h1_1 : IsReplOfVarInFormula r s P_u P_v h2 : ¬isBoundIn r P_u h3 : ¬isBoundIn s P_u h1_ih : IsProof ((eq_ r s).imp_ (P_u.iff_ P_v)) ⊢ IsProof ((eq_ r s).imp_ (P_u.not_.iff_ P_v.not_))
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName P_u P_v : Formula h1_1 : IsReplOfVarInFormula r s P_u P_v h1_ih : ¬isBoundIn r P_u → ¬isBoundIn s P_u → IsProof ((eq_ r s).imp_ (P_u.iff_ P_v)) h2 : ¬isBoundIn r P_u h3 : ¬isBoundIn s P_u ⊢ IsProof ((eq_ r s).imp_ (P_u.not_.iff...
https://github.com/pthomas505/FOL.git
097a4abea51b641d144539b9a0f7516f3b9d818c
FOL/NV/Margaris/Fol.lean
FOL.NV.T_21_8
[1404, 1]
[1543, 10]
apply IsDeduct.mp_ ((eq_ r s).imp_ (P_u.iff_ P_v))
P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName P_u P_v : Formula h1_1 : IsReplOfVarInFormula r s P_u P_v h2 : ¬isBoundIn r P_u h3 : ¬isBoundIn s P_u h1_ih : IsProof ((eq_ r s).imp_ (P_u.iff_ P_v)) ⊢ IsProof ((eq_ r s).imp_ (P_u.not_.iff_ P_v.not_))
case a P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName P_u P_v : Formula h1_1 : IsReplOfVarInFormula r s P_u P_v h2 : ¬isBoundIn r P_u h3 : ¬isBoundIn s P_u h1_ih : IsProof ((eq_ r s).imp_ (P_u.iff_ P_v)) ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ (((eq_ r s).imp_ (P_u.iff_ P_v)).imp_ ((eq_ r s).imp_ (P_u.not_.iff_ P_v.not_))) case a P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarNa...
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName P_u P_v : Formula h1_1 : IsReplOfVarInFormula r s P_u P_v h2 : ¬isBoundIn r P_u h3 : ¬isBoundIn s P_u h1_ih : IsProof ((eq_ r s).imp_ (P_u.iff_ P_v)) ⊢ IsProof ((eq_ r s).imp_ (P_u.not_.iff_ P_v.not_)) TACTIC:
https://github.com/pthomas505/FOL.git
097a4abea51b641d144539b9a0f7516f3b9d818c
FOL/NV/Margaris/Fol.lean
FOL.NV.T_21_8
[1404, 1]
[1543, 10]
simp only [def_iff_]
case a P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName P_u P_v : Formula h1_1 : IsReplOfVarInFormula r s P_u P_v h2 : ¬isBoundIn r P_u h3 : ¬isBoundIn s P_u h1_ih : IsProof ((eq_ r s).imp_ (P_u.iff_ P_v)) ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ (((eq_ r s).imp_ (P_u.iff_ P_v)).imp_ ((eq_ r s).imp_ (P_u.not_.iff_ P_v.not_)))
case a P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName P_u P_v : Formula h1_1 : IsReplOfVarInFormula r s P_u P_v h2 : ¬isBoundIn r P_u h3 : ¬isBoundIn s P_u h1_ih : IsProof ((eq_ r s).imp_ (P_u.iff_ P_v)) ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ (((eq_ r s).imp_ ((P_u.imp_ P_v).and_ (P_v.imp_ P_u))).imp_ ((eq_ r s).imp_ ((P_u.not_.imp_ P_v.not_).and_ (...
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case a P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName P_u P_v : Formula h1_1 : IsReplOfVarInFormula r s P_u P_v h2 : ¬isBoundIn r P_u h3 : ¬isBoundIn s P_u h1_ih : IsProof ((eq_ r s).imp_ (P_u.iff_ P_v)) ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ (((eq_ r s).imp_ (P_u.iff_ P_v)).imp_ ((eq_ r s).imp_ (P_...
https://github.com/pthomas505/FOL.git
097a4abea51b641d144539b9a0f7516f3b9d818c
FOL/NV/Margaris/Fol.lean
FOL.NV.T_21_8
[1404, 1]
[1543, 10]
simp only [def_and_]
case a P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName P_u P_v : Formula h1_1 : IsReplOfVarInFormula r s P_u P_v h2 : ¬isBoundIn r P_u h3 : ¬isBoundIn s P_u h1_ih : IsProof ((eq_ r s).imp_ (P_u.iff_ P_v)) ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ (((eq_ r s).imp_ ((P_u.imp_ P_v).and_ (P_v.imp_ P_u))).imp_ ((eq_ r s).imp_ ((P_u.not_.imp_ P_v.not_).and_ (...
case a P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName P_u P_v : Formula h1_1 : IsReplOfVarInFormula r s P_u P_v h2 : ¬isBoundIn r P_u h3 : ¬isBoundIn s P_u h1_ih : IsProof ((eq_ r s).imp_ (P_u.iff_ P_v)) ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ (((eq_ r s).imp_ ((P_u.imp_ P_v).imp_ (P_v.imp_ P_u).not_).not_).imp_ ((eq_ r s).imp_ ((P_u.not_.imp_ P_v.no...
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case a P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName P_u P_v : Formula h1_1 : IsReplOfVarInFormula r s P_u P_v h2 : ¬isBoundIn r P_u h3 : ¬isBoundIn s P_u h1_ih : IsProof ((eq_ r s).imp_ (P_u.iff_ P_v)) ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ (((eq_ r s).imp_ ((P_u.imp_ P_v).and_ (P_v.imp_ P_u))...
https://github.com/pthomas505/FOL.git
097a4abea51b641d144539b9a0f7516f3b9d818c
FOL/NV/Margaris/Fol.lean
FOL.NV.T_21_8
[1404, 1]
[1543, 10]
SC
case a P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName P_u P_v : Formula h1_1 : IsReplOfVarInFormula r s P_u P_v h2 : ¬isBoundIn r P_u h3 : ¬isBoundIn s P_u h1_ih : IsProof ((eq_ r s).imp_ (P_u.iff_ P_v)) ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ (((eq_ r s).imp_ ((P_u.imp_ P_v).imp_ (P_v.imp_ P_u).not_).not_).imp_ ((eq_ r s).imp_ ((P_u.not_.imp_ P_v.no...
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case a P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName P_u P_v : Formula h1_1 : IsReplOfVarInFormula r s P_u P_v h2 : ¬isBoundIn r P_u h3 : ¬isBoundIn s P_u h1_ih : IsProof ((eq_ r s).imp_ (P_u.iff_ P_v)) ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ (((eq_ r s).imp_ ((P_u.imp_ P_v).imp_ (P_v.imp_ P_u)....
https://github.com/pthomas505/FOL.git
097a4abea51b641d144539b9a0f7516f3b9d818c
FOL/NV/Margaris/Fol.lean
FOL.NV.T_21_8
[1404, 1]
[1543, 10]
exact h1_ih
case a P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName P_u P_v : Formula h1_1 : IsReplOfVarInFormula r s P_u P_v h2 : ¬isBoundIn r P_u h3 : ¬isBoundIn s P_u h1_ih : IsProof ((eq_ r s).imp_ (P_u.iff_ P_v)) ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ ((eq_ r s).imp_ (P_u.iff_ P_v))
no goals
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: case a P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName P_u P_v : Formula h1_1 : IsReplOfVarInFormula r s P_u P_v h2 : ¬isBoundIn r P_u h3 : ¬isBoundIn s P_u h1_ih : IsProof ((eq_ r s).imp_ (P_u.iff_ P_v)) ⊢ IsDeduct ∅ ((eq_ r s).imp_ (P_u.iff_ P_v)) TACTIC:
https://github.com/pthomas505/FOL.git
097a4abea51b641d144539b9a0f7516f3b9d818c
FOL/NV/Margaris/Fol.lean
FOL.NV.T_21_8
[1404, 1]
[1543, 10]
simp only [isBoundIn] at h2
P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName P_u Q_u P_v Q_v : Formula h1_1 : IsReplOfVarInFormula r s P_u P_v h1_2 : IsReplOfVarInFormula r s Q_u Q_v h1_ih_1 : ¬isBoundIn r P_u → ¬isBoundIn s P_u → IsProof ((eq_ r s).imp_ (P_u.iff_ P_v)) h1_ih_2 : ¬isBoundIn r Q_u → ¬isBoundIn s Q_u → IsProof ((eq_ r s).imp_ (Q_u.iff_ Q_v)) h2 : ¬...
P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName P_u Q_u P_v Q_v : Formula h1_1 : IsReplOfVarInFormula r s P_u P_v h1_2 : IsReplOfVarInFormula r s Q_u Q_v h1_ih_1 : ¬isBoundIn r P_u → ¬isBoundIn s P_u → IsProof ((eq_ r s).imp_ (P_u.iff_ P_v)) h1_ih_2 : ¬isBoundIn r Q_u → ¬isBoundIn s Q_u → IsProof ((eq_ r s).imp_ (Q_u.iff_ Q_v)) h2 : ¬...
Please generate a tactic in lean4 to solve the state. STATE: P_r P_s : Formula r s : VarName P_u Q_u P_v Q_v : Formula h1_1 : IsReplOfVarInFormula r s P_u P_v h1_2 : IsReplOfVarInFormula r s Q_u Q_v h1_ih_1 : ¬isBoundIn r P_u → ¬isBoundIn s P_u → IsProof ((eq_ r s).imp_ (P_u.iff_ P_v)) h1_ih_2 : ¬isBoundIn r Q_u → ¬isB...