owner
stringclasses
14 values
repo
stringclasses
14 values
id
int64
116k
4.61B
issue_number
int32
1
181k
author
stringlengths
1
39
body
stringlengths
1
262k
created_at
timestamp[us]date
2000-06-06 02:40:44
2026-06-02 20:16:18
updated_at
timestamp[us]date
2000-06-06 02:40:44
2026-06-02 20:22:56
reactions
unknown
author_association
stringclasses
5 values
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
565,147,124
8,183
den-crane
No. I use ``` cd detached let i=1;for f in `ls -1` ; do echo $i $f;((i++)); echo "alter table T attach part '$f';"|clickhouse-client ;sleep 1; done ``` In modern CH versions probably a table `system.detached_parts` can be used for automation.
2019-12-12T19:21:56
2019-12-12T19:24:10
{ "+1": 2 }
CONTRIBUTOR
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
565,236,111
8,181
alexey-milovidov
So, maybe we are compressing uninitialized memory?
2019-12-12T23:39:26
2019-12-12T23:39:26
{}
MEMBER
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
565,302,621
8,164
nicelulu
> We can add a test with `SELECT count(1) FROM remote('127.0.0.{1,1,2}')` or something like that? I added some tests.
2019-12-13T05:09:19
2019-12-13T05:09:19
{}
CONTRIBUTOR
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
565,343,487
8,164
alesapin
and they failed :(
2019-12-13T08:07:20
2019-12-13T08:07:20
{}
MEMBER
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
565,386,686
8,159
gubinjie
I also want to know how to configure the hdfs-engine path.
2019-12-13T10:22:30
2019-12-13T10:22:30
{}
NONE
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
565,431,427
8,093
alexey-milovidov
@huang--yijian Yes, it is safe. We have removed all the dependencies that may prevent installation. The `clickhouse` binary itself doesn't have any dependencies except old enough version of `libc` that already exists in the system.
2019-12-13T12:54:40
2019-12-13T12:54:40
{}
MEMBER
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
565,440,051
8,199
Enmk
> Is this code identical to what we already have in master? almost, I haven't noticed that something like that was already done. However, there are missing specializations in master: ``` if (which.idx == TypeIndex::DateTime64) // ... ``` Let me fixup the PR to include only that.
2019-12-13T13:25:11
2019-12-13T13:25:11
{}
CONTRIBUTOR
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
565,132,173
7,170
alexey-milovidov
https://github.com/ClickHouse/ClickHouse/commit/575da2357368f283a5d9b450144df5c3733b2943
2019-12-12T18:41:58
2019-12-12T18:41:58
{ "laugh": 1 }
MEMBER
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
565,211,497
8,193
filimonov
Indeed it is related to the Nested logic. I think the simpliest option would be just to use some other column naming schema.
2019-12-12T22:15:49
2019-12-12T22:15:49
{}
CONTRIBUTOR
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
565,240,874
8,196
alexey-milovidov
In my debug build, the following query always return 4: ``` $ clickhouse-local --query "SELECT randConstant(CAST(NULL, 'Nullable(Int8)'))" 4 ``` That's quite funny :)
2019-12-12T23:58:14
2019-12-12T23:58:14
{ "laugh": 1 }
MEMBER
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
565,241,571
8,195
filimonov
Also https://github.com/ClickHouse/ClickHouse/issues/7906
2019-12-13T00:00:46
2019-12-13T00:00:46
{}
CONTRIBUTOR
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
565,241,890
8,196
alexey-milovidov
@KochetovNicolai The functions `rand` and `randConstant` are using default implementation for NULLs. But the return type if rand(Nullable(...)) is not Nullable. How's that possible? Please clarify.
2019-12-13T00:01:57
2019-12-13T00:01:57
{}
MEMBER
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
565,398,178
8,196
KochetovNicolai
https://xkcd.com/221/ BTW, for function `rand` it works correct on master. ``` nikkochetovdev.sas.yp-c.yandex.net :) select rand(cast(4 as Nullable(UInt8))) as r, toTypeName(r) SELECT rand(CAST(4, 'Nullable(UInt8)')) AS r, toTypeName(r) ┌─────────r─┬─toTypeName(rand(CAST(4, 'Nullable(UInt8)')))─┐...
2019-12-13T10:57:17
2019-12-13T10:57:17
{}
MEMBER
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
565,323,587
8,170
morigs
Yes, it seems this is duplicate. I'll leave comment about `as` clause in #6104 and I believe we can close this issue as a duplicate
2019-12-13T06:49:41
2019-12-13T16:17:12
{}
NONE
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
565,429,924
8,196
alexey-milovidov
> Oh, I have a fix for that I'll close this PR and wait for you.
2019-12-13T12:49:09
2019-12-13T12:49:19
{}
MEMBER
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
565,525,034
7,386
akuzm
_Too slow_ meaning that the functional stateless tests in debug take longer to complete than integration tests, which were the longest before (not including performance tests).
2019-12-13T17:12:45
2019-12-13T17:13:21
{}
CONTRIBUTOR
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
565,176,659
5,142
filimonov
fixed somewhere between 19.6.3 and 19.7.5.29. I will add that test.
2019-12-12T20:38:09
2019-12-12T20:38:09
{}
CONTRIBUTOR
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
565,325,014
6,104
morigs
It also works the same way inside `as` part when using `create table ... as`. See #8170
2019-12-13T06:55:03
2019-12-13T06:55:03
{}
NONE
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
565,397,268
8,159
alex-krash
Currently HA mode is not supported.
2019-12-13T10:54:35
2019-12-13T10:54:35
{}
CONTRIBUTOR
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
565,418,946
7,785
akuzm
> Can't think of a good way to change current behaviour as ALTER commands can be chained. Can we forbid the chaining in case there is a FREEZE? Apart from this, are there other reasons to add new syntax?
2019-12-13T12:08:44
2019-12-13T12:08:44
{}
CONTRIBUTOR
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
565,088,504
8,179
akuzm
> I'm slightly afraid of `parst_to_do_names` array size for big tables. We could do a denormalized table like the undocumented `system.parts_columns`, but that would probably be an overkill.
2019-12-12T16:47:35
2019-12-12T16:47:35
{}
CONTRIBUTOR
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
565,142,332
8,184
alexey-milovidov
FYI you can also use `clickhouse-compressor` tool.
2019-12-12T19:09:21
2019-12-12T19:09:21
{}
MEMBER
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
565,168,552
8,174
filimonov
To find more details you can try to follow back log by the thread id `[ 36 ]`
2019-12-12T20:16:37
2019-12-12T20:16:37
{}
CONTRIBUTOR
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
565,223,904
8,191
olegkv
Thanks again! :)
2019-12-12T22:56:26
2019-12-12T22:56:26
{}
CONTRIBUTOR
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
565,238,073
8,185
alexey-milovidov
hung - known issues, CC @Akazz
2019-12-12T23:47:00
2019-12-12T23:47:00
{}
MEMBER
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
565,245,719
8,120
nvartolomei
@jsding you will have to create a new table and copy data.
2019-12-13T00:17:17
2019-12-13T00:17:17
{}
CONTRIBUTOR
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
565,373,854
8,166
Vxider
I tested the parallel insert with the `hits` dataset, and added the results in the description above.
2019-12-13T09:44:36
2019-12-13T09:44:36
{}
CONTRIBUTOR
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
565,399,890
7,790
bgranvea
ok, I have a test case with ALTER ... DELETE instead of TTL but the result is the same. I add it to the pull request.
2019-12-13T11:02:13
2019-12-13T11:02:13
{}
CONTRIBUTOR
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
565,414,422
8,166
Vxider
Thanks for the review, all have been fixed in the new commit.
2019-12-13T11:51:57
2019-12-13T11:51:57
{}
CONTRIBUTOR
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
565,426,055
8,112
akuzm
query | rps -- | -- SELECT count() FROM system.numbers WHERE NOT ignore(round(toInt64(number), -2)) | (386154838 rps.) SELECT count() FROM system.numbers WHERE NOT ignore(bankersRound(toInt64(number), -2)) | (294367764 rps.) Looks like it's significantly slower for ints. Overall, I think the code became some...
2019-12-13T12:34:02
2019-12-13T12:34:02
{}
CONTRIBUTOR
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
565,538,683
8,205
alexey-milovidov
Maybe better to allow just `REPLACE DICTIONARY` query? (atomic dictionary recreate) Support for all possible properties to ALTER will be too cumbersome.
2019-12-13T17:48:13
2019-12-13T17:48:28
{ "+1": 2 }
MEMBER
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
565,134,100
8,120
den-crane
> The original table is too big and uncontrollable increased, we have to query data daily and combine them in application layer. You are mistaken. @nvartolomei is right. You need one MV partitioned by day. CH SQL partition pruning works almost exactly the same as a query to a separated table. There is no diff...
2019-12-12T18:47:32
2019-12-12T18:48:20
{}
CONTRIBUTOR
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
565,212,372
8,191
filimonov
https://github.com/ClickHouse/ClickHouse/issues/6287 and https://github.com/ClickHouse/ClickHouse/issues/5131
2019-12-12T22:18:46
2019-12-12T22:21:50
{}
CONTRIBUTOR
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
565,244,549
8,120
jsding
Thanks for the information. BTW, is there any way to change the partitioning key? or I have to create a new table, and copy all data into this new table? Appreciate for your help.
2019-12-13T00:12:30
2019-12-13T00:12:30
{}
NONE
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
565,490,393
8,112
alexey-milovidov
Current implementation is "round half towards higer absolute value": ``` milovidov-Pro-P30 :) SELECT round(15, -1) SELECT round(15, -1) ┌─round(15, -1)─┐ │ 20 │ └───────────────┘ 1 rows in set. Elapsed: 0.020 sec. milovidov-Pro-P30 :) SELECT round(-15, -1) SELECT round(-15, -1) ┌─rou...
2019-12-13T15:45:59
2019-12-13T15:46:17
{}
MEMBER
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
565,059,653
8,172
den-crane
echo "exists a.a"|clickhouse-benchmark An error occurred while processing query: exists a.a DB::Exception: Attempt to read after eof: while receiving packet from localhost:9000
2019-12-12T15:39:07
2019-12-12T15:41:47
{ "+1": 1 }
CONTRIBUTOR
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
565,538,438
8,207
nikitamikhaylov
Exactly.
2019-12-13T17:47:29
2019-12-13T17:47:29
{}
MEMBER
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
565,539,395
8,168
zhang2014
That seems to be the current logic. I'm not sure if I missed part of the logic. https://github.com/ClickHouse/ClickHouse/blob/master/dbms/src/Storages/MergeTree/MergeTreeDataSelectExecutor.cpp#L548 And https://github.com/ClickHouse/ClickHouse/blob/master/dbms/src/Storages/MergeTree/MergeTreeDataSelectExecutor....
2019-12-13T17:50:12
2019-12-13T17:50:12
{}
CONTRIBUTOR
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
565,136,513
8,169
4ertus2
> So now with the change from t1.c1 as c1 to t1.c1 the outer select fails. I cannot reproduce. This code works. ``` drop table if exists t1; drop table if exists t2; create table t1 (c1 UInt8) Engine = Memory; create table t2 (c1 UInt8) Engine = Memory; select c1 from ( select t1.c1 from t1 ...
2019-12-12T18:54:19
2019-12-12T18:56:51
{}
CONTRIBUTOR
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
565,209,023
8,003
filimonov
> @filimonov Is this a bug for some particular use case or in general when using kafka engine ? 1) it is already fixed, but fix was not released yet. 2) you hit that bug if your messages in Kafka have no timestamp, or if you use Native format. > Prevent message duplication when producing Kafka table has any MVs ...
2019-12-12T22:08:25
2019-12-12T22:08:25
{}
CONTRIBUTOR
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
565,241,274
8,195
filimonov
Right now - yes. You can create a distributed table above with special cluster configuration with internal_replication=false to fill 2 (or more) Engine=Join tables simultaniously.
2019-12-12T23:59:47
2019-12-12T23:59:47
{}
CONTRIBUTOR
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
565,354,391
8,198
filimonov
1) check table defaults & missing columns. 2) check if datatypes match between Distibuted and underlying table. 3) if aneryting looks correct - please share your table definitions and data sample
2019-12-13T08:45:57
2019-12-13T08:47:57
{}
CONTRIBUTOR
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
565,428,569
7,785
nvartolomei
> Can we forbid the chaining in case there is a FREEZE? Apart from this, are there other reasons to add new syntax? Breaking change? We might also output result if there is one alter command and do not output if there are no commands but code might get dirty and behaviour might be a bit surprising to users.
2019-12-13T12:43:53
2019-12-13T12:43:53
{}
CONTRIBUTOR
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
565,430,689
8,199
alexey-milovidov
Is this code identical to what we already have in master?
2019-12-13T12:51:59
2019-12-13T12:51:59
{}
MEMBER
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
565,453,005
8,204
akuzm
So can we have `useDefaultImplementationForNulls` for functions that have non-nullable result type for nullable arguments? I supported this here: https://github.com/ClickHouse/ClickHouse/pull/7386/files#diff-6afa37fa0db71a6ed14bc0bc87dc771aR128 but maybe I have to add asserts instead.
2019-12-13T14:06:49
2019-12-13T14:06:49
{}
CONTRIBUTOR
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
565,139,599
8,184
den-crane
Not compressed. clickhouse-client --query="select * from default.TestTable where date='2019-11-11' format Native" | gzip > TestTable.native.gz
2019-12-12T19:02:11
2019-12-12T19:02:28
{ "+1": 1 }
CONTRIBUTOR
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
562,448,477
8,059
excitoon
<s>Based on #7420</s>
2019-12-06T06:20:08
2019-12-12T19:45:05
{}
CONTRIBUTOR
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
565,166,681
8,174
filimonov
Do you try to copy the data from Kafka to usual (non materialized) view? Can you show the structure of your tables?
2019-12-12T20:11:23
2019-12-12T20:11:23
{}
CONTRIBUTOR
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
565,342,112
8,093
huang--yijian
> maybe you can download the clickhouse rpm using `thunder` and transfer the file to your machine and install rpm directly Is it safe to download and install ClickHouse RPMs by "rpm -Fvh", in order to upgrade ClickHouse to 19.17 or later versions in production ? It skips dependency check by yum install.
2019-12-13T08:02:01
2019-12-13T08:02:01
{}
NONE
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
565,385,885
8,164
nicelulu
> and they failed :( I'll fetch the latest code and try it. This test is fine with me locally.
2019-12-13T10:20:06
2019-12-13T10:20:18
{}
CONTRIBUTOR
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
565,138,927
8,149
alexey-milovidov
BTW, we can also quickly compare array offsets for equality as a whole.
2019-12-12T19:00:36
2019-12-12T19:00:36
{}
MEMBER
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
565,193,944
8,191
filimonov
Date vs DateTime. Try: ``` select count() from test_index where id = '1' and dt >= toDateTime(today()) ```
2019-12-12T21:26:26
2019-12-12T21:26:26
{}
CONTRIBUTOR
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
565,210,180
8,170
filimonov
Sounds familiar: #6104
2019-12-12T22:12:01
2019-12-12T22:12:01
{}
CONTRIBUTOR
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
565,210,592
8,191
olegkv
toDateTime() solves it, thanks! Wondering, if implicit conversion from Date to DateTime is done by CH, what does it lose during conversion so that index is not used anymore..
2019-12-12T22:13:10
2019-12-12T22:13:10
{}
CONTRIBUTOR
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
565,072,317
8,169
vincenzon
Well actually ... I'm discovering this to be more troubling than I thought. In my constructions I have: ``` select c1 from ( select t1.c1 -- Breaking code was: t1.c1 as c1 from t1 any left join t2 on t1.c1 = t2.c1 ) ``` So now with the change from `t1.c1 as c1` to `t1.c1` the outer select fai...
2019-12-12T16:08:14
2019-12-12T16:08:44
{}
NONE
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
565,079,728
8,179
alesapin
I'm slightly afraid of `parst_to_do_names` array size for big tables.
2019-12-12T16:26:31
2019-12-12T16:26:31
{}
MEMBER
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
565,127,874
8,169
vincenzon
Here is a minimal reproducing example: ``` drop table if exists t1; create table t1 (c1 String) ENGINE = Memory; insert into t1 values ('A1'); drop table if exists t2; create table t2 (c1 String, c2 String) ENGINE = Memory; insert into t2 values ('A2', 'A3'); drop table if exists t3; create table t3 (c2 ...
2019-12-12T18:30:03
2019-12-12T18:30:03
{}
NONE
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
565,133,679
8,182
akuzm
For the record, this is the last context where I've seen it: https://clickhouse-test-reports.s3.yandex.net/8173/3630b06cf9ba2b1e82b1a121495402a8e00e25b6/functional_stateless_tests_(memory)/stderr.log Very simple, just an exception thrown. ``` ==199==WARNING: MemorySanitizer: use-of-uninitialized-value #0...
2019-12-12T18:46:19
2019-12-12T18:46:19
{}
CONTRIBUTOR
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
565,145,005
8,169
vincenzon
Right, that's the problem. I thought your table aliasing trick might subvert it and magically work but no luck. I've added the code to our query generator to check if the join is single or multiple and adapted the generated query to account for the difference. It just seems like a bit of a hack, but it definitely works...
2019-12-12T19:16:16
2019-12-12T19:16:16
{}
NONE
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
565,524,673
7,386
akuzm
The test are too slow now, I'll have to profile them. Will separately commit the fixes I made, without enabling the assert.
2019-12-13T17:11:49
2019-12-13T17:11:49
{}
CONTRIBUTOR
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
565,525,147
7,792
KochetovNicolai
I've added an experimental commit which should simplify code a little bit. It have passed your new test. If something is wrong, will just revert it.
2019-12-13T17:13:07
2019-12-13T17:13:07
{}
MEMBER
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
565,203,906
8,183
simPod
Perfect! Thanks for the command btw, will use it right now meanwhile.
2019-12-12T21:53:29
2019-12-12T21:53:29
{}
CONTRIBUTOR
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
565,234,248
8,181
alexey-milovidov
It didn't: https://clickhouse-test-reports.s3.yandex.net/8181/51c1a120b86445e5367ad80b65b35bd69af89833/functional_stateless_tests_(memory)/stderr.log
2019-12-12T23:32:16
2019-12-12T23:32:16
{}
MEMBER
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
565,415,035
8,180
filimonov
Sidenote: your pipeline looks suspicious. I'm not sure if `sum_table_mv` will produce the results you expect from it.
2019-12-13T11:54:14
2019-12-13T11:54:14
{}
CONTRIBUTOR
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
565,472,280
8,204
KochetovNicolai
> So can we have useDefaultImplementationForNulls for functions that have non-nullable result type for nullable arguments? No. It's better to add assert.
2019-12-13T15:00:16
2019-12-13T15:00:16
{}
MEMBER
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
565,535,716
7,946
alexey-milovidov
> but instead of file contents, store S3 URL along with refcount \+ file size.
2019-12-13T17:40:03
2019-12-13T17:40:25
{}
MEMBER
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
565,190,785
8,183
filimonov
But actually it can be quite useful, especially during migration from MergeTree to Replicated. Let's change it to feature request.
2019-12-12T21:17:42
2019-12-12T21:17:42
{}
CONTRIBUTOR
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
565,192,951
8,175
filimonov
Related https://github.com/ClickHouse/ClickHouse/issues/5486
2019-12-12T21:23:42
2019-12-12T21:23:42
{}
CONTRIBUTOR
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
565,233,383
8,179
alexey-milovidov
> I'm slightly afraid of parst_to_do_names array size for big tables. I'm Ok with that.
2019-12-12T23:29:21
2019-12-12T23:29:21
{}
MEMBER
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
565,402,296
8,196
akuzm
> For rand constant - not Why? This function looks like it should return some non-null value even for nullable arguments. And in general I can imagine that there exists some function that has a non-nullable result type despite having nullable arguments.
2019-12-13T11:09:26
2019-12-13T11:09:26
{}
CONTRIBUTOR
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
565,537,511
8,207
alexey-milovidov
We just lowered the number of iterations and removed timeout?
2019-12-13T17:45:02
2019-12-13T17:45:02
{}
MEMBER
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
565,129,956
8,182
alexey-milovidov
But we don't use libgcc_s for clang build. We build our own libunwind and our own libcxxabi.
2019-12-12T18:35:45
2019-12-12T18:35:45
{}
MEMBER
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
565,134,614
8,182
alexey-milovidov
Yes, that's clear that `scan_eh_tab` function is reading data from uninstrumented memory and it's as expected.
2019-12-12T18:48:57
2019-12-12T18:48:57
{}
MEMBER
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
565,183,867
7,845
filimonov
That is not something new. It's duplicate of #3492.The problem appears at any server restart. Related to #6104
2019-12-12T20:58:21
2019-12-12T20:58:21
{}
CONTRIBUTOR
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
565,429,824
8,196
alexey-milovidov
> Why? This function looks like it should return some non-null value even for nullable arguments. And in general I can imagine that there exists some function that has a non-nullable result type despite having nullable arguments. Yes, it should not have "useDefaultImplementationForNulls". As documented, all argumen...
2019-12-13T12:48:50
2019-12-13T12:48:50
{}
MEMBER
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
565,447,745
8,196
KochetovNicolai
#8204
2019-12-13T13:50:31
2019-12-13T13:50:31
{}
MEMBER
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
565,466,634
8,112
hczhcz
I would suggest `roundHalfUp`. And maybe `roundHalfDown`, `roundHalfTowardZero`, and `roundHalfTowardInfinity` if people really need them.
2019-12-13T14:45:14
2019-12-13T14:45:14
{}
CONTRIBUTOR
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
565,111,631
8,169
vincenzon
Well actually actually ... It looks like the behaviour changes depending on whether the join is a single join or a multiple join. This: ``` select t1.c1 from t1 left join t2 on t1.c1 = t2.c1 ``` returns a column labelled "c1". However, ``` select t1.c1 from t1 left join t2 on t1.c1 = t2.c1 left joi...
2019-12-12T17:45:43
2019-12-12T17:45:43
{}
NONE
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
565,132,912
8,182
alexey-milovidov
I have a hypothesis that this function is parsing exception handling info from mmapped part of our binary and as this mmap happens at startup, it's not instrumented. So, the patch makes sense.
2019-12-12T18:43:56
2019-12-12T18:43:56
{}
MEMBER
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
565,139,374
8,169
vincenzon
Sorry, I'm not a saying the queries don't work. I'm saying the resulting column labels are inconsistent. In the single join case the table prefix is dropped (c1 not t1.c1). In the double join case it is not (t1.c1 not c1). I don't have a preference for either (though if I did I'd expect to be able to enforce it using a...
2019-12-12T19:01:37
2019-12-12T19:01:37
{}
NONE
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
565,143,530
8,169
4ertus2
OK. Reproduced. It's not possible to access `t1.c1` via `c1` out of multiple join subquery. ``` select c1 from ( select t1.c1 as c1 from t1 any left join t2 on t1.c1 = t2.c1 any left join t3 on t1.c1 = t3.c1 ); ``` If there's no alias it sayes ``` Missing columns: 'c1' while processing que...
2019-12-12T19:12:32
2019-12-12T19:13:32
{}
CONTRIBUTOR
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
565,199,141
4,064
filimonov
It is the duplicate of https://github.com/ClickHouse/ClickHouse/issues/5142 Shoule work starting from 19.7
2019-12-12T21:40:22
2019-12-12T21:40:22
{}
CONTRIBUTOR
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
565,210,817
8,194
excitoon
This fixes problem introduced in #7670 .
2019-12-12T22:13:48
2019-12-12T22:13:48
{}
CONTRIBUTOR
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
565,234,011
8,181
alexey-milovidov
00600_replace_running_query - flap.
2019-12-12T23:31:20
2019-12-12T23:31:20
{}
MEMBER
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
565,245,427
8,166
alexey-milovidov
The results are very promising! It will be also interesting to test on real dataset. What if we will INSERT SELECT `test.hits` dataset (all rows; or with some filter): https://clickhouse.yandex/docs/en/getting_started/example_datasets/metrica/
2019-12-13T00:16:08
2019-12-13T00:16:08
{}
MEMBER
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
565,246,753
8,195
filimonov
> I just wonder whether the RFC Distributed variant and not the Replicated one? It's just RFC, very unconcrete for now. But sounds like replicated may be needed too.
2019-12-13T00:21:24
2019-12-13T00:21:44
{}
CONTRIBUTOR
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
565,339,318
8,196
akuzm
Oh, I have a fix for that: https://github.com/ClickHouse/ClickHouse/pull/7386/files#diff-6afa37fa0db71a6ed14bc0bc87dc771aR129
2019-12-13T07:51:28
2019-12-13T07:51:28
{}
CONTRIBUTOR
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
565,388,710
7,790
bgranvea
I've reproduced the bug on my test database but still haven't a simple test case. What happens is that 2 empty parts (0 rows) are merged in background. AggregatingSortedBlockInputStream wrongly generates 1 value for SimpleAggregateFunction columns (see my fix). When the result block is written, there is a check in B...
2019-12-13T10:28:34
2019-12-13T10:28:34
{}
CONTRIBUTOR
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
565,405,152
8,162
akuzm
> Oops, seems like we don't have a gcc 8 build in CI. I'll check if we can add it. We won't add it now because the CI is overloaded, maybe later if it breaks too often.
2019-12-13T11:18:49
2019-12-13T11:18:49
{}
CONTRIBUTOR
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
565,413,220
8,197
filimonov
Did some manual checks. It looks ok.
2019-12-13T11:47:21
2019-12-13T11:47:21
{}
CONTRIBUTOR
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
565,421,416
8,180
samuelblawrence
Appreciate your responses and look forward to the fix being available. re. your sidenote - can you elaborate? If I make a normal view then I do see the data I want - e.g. ``` CREATE VIEW v1 as SELECT gid, sumState(value) as value FROM ( select gid, argMaxMerge(value) as value FROM to_table ...
2019-12-13T12:17:46
2019-12-13T12:17:46
{}
NONE
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
565,083,824
8,177
stavrolia
> Test needed. I forget to make this PR a draft or stay [WIP] in name when decide to add test in another commit. Sorry that I wasted your time on obvious comment.
2019-12-12T16:36:22
2019-12-12T16:36:22
{}
CONTRIBUTOR
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
565,133,230
8,169
4ertus2
> returns a column labelled "t1.c1". This seems inconsistent to me and unnecessarily complicated to code around. It's not good but expected. Aliases are used to implement multiple join logic: first join would be rewritten with aliases and wrapped into subselect. For single query logic you'll get first table unqualif...
2019-12-12T18:44:56
2019-12-12T18:44:56
{}
CONTRIBUTOR
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
565,140,405
8,149
alexey-milovidov
`ColumnArray::hasEqualOffsets`
2019-12-12T19:04:09
2019-12-12T19:04:09
{}
MEMBER
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
565,145,973
8,180
filimonov
Subselects in MV above Kafka table don't work (yet). They will (soon).
2019-12-12T19:18:57
2019-12-12T19:19:50
{}
CONTRIBUTOR
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
563,431,120
8,107
excitoon
<s>Based on #7420</s>
2019-12-09T20:47:51
2019-12-12T19:41:47
{}
CONTRIBUTOR
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
565,242,459
8,195
simPod
Will try, thanks! The linked RFC is IMO the way to go from here so perhaps can close? I just wonder whether the RFC is only about Distributed variant and not the Replicated one?
2019-12-13T00:04:10
2019-12-13T00:04:10
{}
CONTRIBUTOR
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
565,427,338
8,112
alexey-milovidov
> Overall, I think the code became somewhat complicated. I'd add banker's round as a new mode to RoundingMode, implement each mode for each type, make them accessible from SQL as bankersRound() & roundToInt() or something. And then for backwards compatibility write out our current round() as calls to bankers() for floa...
2019-12-13T12:39:14
2019-12-13T12:40:23
{}
MEMBER
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
565,455,478
8,199
Enmk
> Let me fixup the PR to include only that. Done
2019-12-13T14:14:05
2019-12-13T14:14:05
{}
CONTRIBUTOR
ClickHouse
ClickHouse
573,157,526
8,618
alexey-milovidov
You don't have to build all targets. To build clickhouse, just type `ninja clickhouse`.
2020-01-10T18:43:28
2020-01-10T18:43:28
{ "laugh": 1 }
MEMBER