text stringlengths 0 353 | EmoClass stringclasses 10
values | EmoAct float64 1 7 | EmoVal float64 1 7 | EmoDom float64 1 7 | SpkrID stringlengths 1 7 | Gender stringclasses 3
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
actually, just map out the process of sending and validating a message from one subnet to another. | X | 4.8 | 4.2 | 5 | Unknown | Unknown |
does that sound like something that would be up in your neck of the woods? | X | 4.6 | 4.4 | 4.6 | 1655 | Male |
but i think the use cases are actually pretty understandable. | N | 3.2 | 4.8 | 4.4 | 1655 | Male |
it's another thing to participate in a collaborative conversation and nut out those difficult bits that you just don't quite get. | X | 4.8 | 3.6 | 5 | 1653 | Female |
yeah, i know, obviously it was very rewarding. | X | 4.6 | 4.6 | 4.8 | 1653 | Female |
i guess if you're doing a phd, you do very interesting work and you can look into cool cryptographic protocols and things like that. | N | 4.8 | 4.4 | 4.6 | 1653 | Female |
what's really cool about the finish is that we have a lot of technical challenges- | H | 4.2 | 4.8 | 4.6 | 1653 | Female |
... so you can imagine that this communication between subnet is a bit more difficult than if everything would be one gigantic blockchain. | N | 4.2 | 3.8 | 4.8 | 1653 | Female |
... what we call this chain key technology. | N | 4 | 4 | 4.6 | 1655 | Male |
signed that message, or must have contributed to signing that message. | X | 4.2 | 4.4 | 5.2 | 1655 | Male |
... now this we can use to allow subnets to communicate with each other. | N | 4.6 | 4.4 | 3.8 | 1653 | Female |
what would happen is that something in the blockchain triggers this canister, right? | N | 4.4 | 4 | 4.6 | 1653 | Female |
... some type of message calls this canister- | N | 4 | 4 | 4.2 | 1653 | Female |
now anybody with that, that basically is evidence that this subnet- | N | 4.8 | 3.2 | 4.8 | 1653 | Female |
... one or a random one, and they might now say, "oh, yeah-" | N | 4.6 | 3.4 | 5 | 1655 | Male |
... just like ingress messages coming from users. | N | 4.6 | 3.8 | 4 | 1655 | Male |
that sounds profound, because for this to work, you have to have such a symphony of coordinated- | H | 4.6 | 4.4 | 4.8 | 1655 | Male |
events. your subnet has to be interacting with all other subnets, at least some regular cadence. | N | 4 | 4.4 | 4.2 | 1655 | Male |
well, i would've thought that the geographical location of all of the replicas in a subnet is not public knowledge. | N | 4.4 | 3.8 | 4.4 | Unknown | Unknown |
... all the time, or every 10 seconds, or every five seconds- | N | 4.6 | 3.4 | 4.4 | 1655 | Male |
... works, right? this is a secure way for the different blockchains in the computer to communicate- | N | 4.4 | 4 | 5.2 | 1653 | Female |
... so there's some potential future improvements, i guess. | N | 4.2 | 3.8 | 3.8 | 1653 | Female |
right, and i suppose this is the whole idea of the- | N | 4.2 | 3.8 | 4.4 | 1653 | Female |
... is that upgrades to the system can be ongoing, depending on the actual state of usage of- | N | 4.6 | 4.4 | 4 | 1653 | Female |
... and otherwise, it's actually relatively easy to make significant changes between replica versions. | X | 4.4 | 4.4 | 4.4 | 1653 | Female |
so, the governance system by the community can change the internet computer pretty drastically, and make it faster and better and- | H | 4.8 | 4.4 | 4.6 | 1653 | Female |
it also seems like quite a minimalist passive solution, where you are doing the bare minimum to facilitate this type of inter-subnet communication. | H | 5.4 | 4.2 | 5.4 | 1653 | Female |
... say, a queue or something like that for egress messages, right? | N | 4.4 | 3.4 | 4 | 1653 | Female |
it started to make sense, because this is just one of those parts of the internet computer because there's so much to it. | N | 5.2 | 4.4 | 4.8 | 1653 | Female |
for me, it gives me pause for consideration- | N | 3.6 | 4.2 | 4.8 | 1653 | Female |
... a particular piece of software that you want to disrupt could- | N | 3.6 | 4.6 | 4.8 | 1653 | Female |
but that would of course introduce latency and other performance issues. | N | 3.4 | 3 | 4.4 | 1653 | Female |
so, all of these different qualities need to be balanced in the implementation depending on the- | N | 4 | 4.2 | 4.8 | 1653 | Female |
yeah, i think one interesting thing here is also that because we have many different subnets- | N | 4.8 | 4.2 | 4.8 | 1653 | Female |
... so there's another thing, we can kind of circle right to the start of this conversation and look a little bit at the way- | X | 4.2 | 4.8 | 4.8 | 1653 | Female |
... and that the public key, that private key goes to is the chain key- | N | 4.2 | 4.2 | 4.6 | 1653 | Female |
yeah, that's exactly right.so really, it sounds to me like chain key cryptography- | H | 5 | 5.4 | 5.4 | 1653 | Female |
it's not so much a new innovation, so much as it's a consequence of threshold relay randomness generation. | N | 4.2 | 3.2 | 4.2 | 1653 | Female |
we don't need that the key is constant. | X | 4.2 | 3.4 | 4 | 1653 | Female |
... and i think the key innovation that we made since then, when we started calling it the chain key cryptography, is when we decided to keep this publicly fixed at all- | N | 4.6 | 4.4 | 4.2 | 1653 | Female |
okay, now that they have this piece of sensitive information and they're outside the network- | X | 3.8 | 4.8 | 4.8 | 1653 | Female |
suppose the secret key is a number between zero and 10. | N | 3.6 | 4.6 | 4.6 | 1653 | Female |
now, if the two of us will be replicas on the subnet- | N | 4.8 | 4.6 | 4.4 | 1653 | Female |
okay, and they add up to five module 10. okay- | N | 4.6 | 4.2 | 4.2 | 1653 | Female |
... because i don't know your share. now maybe over time, somebody else comes in and we're going to have a third replica. | N | 5 | 3.6 | 4.8 | 1653 | Female |
for the listeners, because this is something that would trip me up and i had this same conversation a while ago, and i'm sort of recalling it. modular is- | H | 4.8 | 4.2 | 3.8 | 1653 | Female |
now, you can see the three of us have fresh secret keyshares, but- | N | 3.6 | 4.2 | 4 | 1653 | Female |
... combine that with the secret keyshare that you have now or- | N | 5 | 4.2 | 4.6 | 1653 | Female |
... then if we had some bad members in the past and some bad members now- | N | 4.4 | 3.8 | 4 | 1653 | Female |
how does that happen in a non-interactive fashion? | N | 4.8 | 3.8 | 5 | 1655 | Male |
or, we might want to reshuffle an existing key and give everybody new shares of an existing secret. | N | 4 | 4.2 | 4 | 1653 | Female |
i can basically choose a part of a secret key and say, "this is what i'm going to contribute to the secret key." | N | 4 | 4.2 | 4.4 | 1653 | Female |
can split that into pieces and give each replica a subnet. a piece of the secret key that i chose so that they add up to the right- | N | 4.4 | 4.2 | 4 | 1653 | Female |
only you should be able to view your share of the secret key and- | N | 4.6 | 3.6 | 4.6 | 1653 | Female |
right? that these pieces that i'm encrypting actually add up to the secret that i'm sharing. | X | 5 | 4.4 | 4.8 | 1653 | Female |
this is where a lot of zero-knowledge proofs comes in. | N | 3.6 | 3.2 | 3.8 | 1653 | Female |
this is all well-formed, and that if you were to decrypt your encryption, you would end up with a valid secret keyshare and i can prove this all- | N | 4.6 | 4 | 4.4 | 1653 | Female |
... many of them are doing a good job and give good randomness. | N | 4 | 4.6 | 4.6 | 1653 | Female |
actually very secure, and no one replica knows the secret. | N | 4 | 4.2 | 4.8 | 1653 | Female |
okay, wow, you just explained the distributed key generation thing, like- | H | 4.6 | 5.4 | 5 | 1653 | Female |
that's so cool. now, can we go through some of the other uses of this? | X | 4.6 | 4.6 | 4.6 | 1653 | Female |
yeah, so i think this concept of a single public key is useful in many areas. | N | 5 | 4.6 | 4.8 | 1653 | Female |
for example, imagine that you're a replica on the subnet- | N | 4.4 | 4.2 | 4.2 | 1653 | Female |
... because either you need to get the full history of the subnet, like the full blockchain- | N | 4.4 | 3 | 4.2 | 1653 | Female |
... processing new stuff. at the same time this- | N | 4.2 | 4.4 | 5.4 | 1653 | Female |
but within this time, maybe the membership of the subnet changed. | N | 4.6 | 4.4 | 5 | 1655 | Male |
it would be very difficult to know how you can catch up to the latest states, and what to trust. | N | 3.8 | 3.8 | 4.2 | 1653 | Female |
... is fixed public key. we know that this key always remains the same, so- | N | 4.2 | 4.2 | 4.2 | 1653 | Female |
... very easy to catch up to the latest states and start contributing again. | N | 4 | 4.4 | 4 | 1653 | Female |
okay, so all you need is just the current state and the signature. | N | 4.2 | 4.2 | 4.2 | 1653 | Female |
... and securely jump to the latest state of a subnet and start contributing. | N | 4 | 3.6 | 4.4 | 1653 | Female |
have your, say, ethereum smart contract there that you can access with that? | H | 4.2 | 4 | 4.8 | 1653 | Female |
i think the other huge advantage of this chain key is just that it's very easy for anybody to verify anything from the internet computer. | X | 4 | 4.2 | 4.8 | 1653 | Female |
the security comes from the fact that you have a full blockchain that you verify each step of the way, that you somehow look out for other block chains. | N | 4.8 | 4.4 | 4.2 | 1653 | Female |
i feel sorry for the audience because this has been a bit more focused on updating arthur than maybe answering a list of questions so much. | H | 4.6 | 5 | 4 | 1653 | Female |
the way threshold really works right, is you have your committee. | N | 4.6 | 4 | 4.8 | 1653 | Female |
that randomness is used to select the next committee. we're talking about this for the beacon chain, rather than the subjects. | N | 4.8 | 3.8 | 4.6 | 1653 | Female |
i guess the power of the random beacon is that while it's unpredictable. | N | 4.2 | 4 | 4.6 | Unknown | Unknown |
because these signatures are deterministic, and that means that the random beacon is unbiasable. | N | 4.4 | 3 | 4.8 | 1653 | Female |
then you open yourself up to some attacks where you can bias things. | N | 5 | 3.6 | 4.6 | 1653 | Female |
i think i might not have any open questions personally about the internet computer. | H | 5.4 | 5 | 4.8 | 1653 | Female |
i have to hear it a bunch of times, before you can truly make sense of it. | N | 4 | 4.2 | 4.4 | 1653 | Female |
we're working on stability and performance. | N | 4 | 4.4 | 3.4 | 1653 | Female |
and yeah, let's take a point of catching up again to dig into some of this more interesting stuff. | N | 4.4 | 4.2 | 4.8 | 1653 | Female |
together, they are part of a larger effort at ecosystem building. we are called. | N | 3.8 | 3.6 | 4.6 | 1653 | Female |
visit cycle dao dot x-y-z, to subscribe and learn more. | H | 3.6 | 5 | 5.4 | 1653 | Female |
i'm part of the team there and outed our co-founder is also part of the team there and we're big fans of [inaudible 00:01:30]. | N | 3.2 | 3.6 | 3.8 | 1653 | Female |
of course, we were watching this project for years and we came across this article. | X | 3 | 4.8 | 4 | 1653 | Female |
we, of course saw their davis presentation and excited, but... | X | 4.2 | 3.8 | 5.2 | 1653 | Female |
and i was talking to [inaudible 00:01:45] and we were like, this is something that we could do. | N | 4 | 4.4 | 4.8 | 1655 | Male |
to develop that and give it a shot to survive in the real world, as a real thing. they said, "yeah, sure, we'll totally support you. | N | 4 | 4.6 | 4.4 | 1655 | Male |
we saw it developing more into community development tool. so still professional in many senses but... | N | 4.2 | 4.2 | 4.2 | 1655 | Male |
not restricted to that and empowering users to create groups that they... | N | 3.6 | 4.2 | 4.6 | 1653 | Female |
govern themselves and have a lot of autonomy over and then build this communities, interact... | N | 4 | 4 | 4.2 | 1653 | Female |
maybe let them merge and create this dynamic social dimension. | N | 4.4 | 4 | 4.4 | 1653 | Female |
so we are just building the tools that let them develop communities of any source. | N | 3.4 | 4.8 | 4.2 | 1653 | Female |
but they tend to enjoy more, smaller... | N | 3.6 | 4.2 | 3.8 | 1653 | Female |
the interesting thing i guess about social media and the web. | N | 3.4 | 4.2 | 4 | 1653 | Female |
world, which is global by default. right? | N | 3 | 4 | 3.6 | 1653 | Female |
it doesn't give us this more human experience. | N | 2.8 | 3.6 | 4.2 | 1653 | Female |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.