content stringlengths 1 15.9M |
|---|
\section{Introduction}
\IEEEPARstart{S}{uppose}
we are given a data matrix $\mathbf{D} \in \mathbb{R}^{N_1 \times N_2} $, which can be expressed as
\begin{eqnarray}
\mathbf{D}= \mathbf{L}+\mathbf{S},
\label{eq1}
\end{eqnarray}
where $\mathbf{L}$ is a low rank (LR) and $\mathbf{S}$ is a sparse matrix with arbitrary unknown support, whose entries can have arbitrarily
large magnitude.
Many important applications in which the data under study can be naturally modeled using (\ref{eq1}) were discussed in \cite{lamport2}. The cutting-edge Principal Component Pursuit approach developed in \cite{lamport2 , lamport1},
directly decomposes $\mathbf{D}$ into its LR and sparse components by solving the convex program
\begin{eqnarray}
\begin{aligned}
& \underset{\dot{\mathbf{L}},\dot{\mathbf{S}}}{\min}
& & \lambda\|\dot{\mathbf{S}}\|_1 + \|\dot{\mathbf{L}} \|_* \\
& \text{subject to}
& & \dot{\mathbf{L}} + \dot{\mathbf{S}} = \mathbf{D} \: \\
\end{aligned}
\label{eq2}
\end{eqnarray}
where $\|.\|_1$ is the $\ell_1$-norm, $\|.\|_*$ is the nuclear norm and $\lambda$ determines the trade-off between the sparse and LR components \cite{ lamport1}.
The convex program (\ref{eq2}) can precisely recover both the LR and sparse components if the columns and rows subspace of $\mathbf{L}$ are sufficiently incoherent with the standard basis and the non-zero elements of $\mathbf{S}$ are sufficiently diffused \cite{lamport1}.
Although the problem in (\ref{eq2}) is convex, its computational complexity is intolerable with large volumes of high-dimensional data.
Even the efficient iterative algorithms proposed in \cite{lamport53, lamport23} have prohibitive computational and memory requirements
in high-dimensional settings.
\smallbreak
\noindent\textbf{Contributions:} This paper proposes a new randomized decomposition approach, which extracts the LR component in two consecutive steps. First, the column-space (CS) of $\mathbf{L}$ is learned from a small subset of the columns of the data matrix. Second, the row-space (RS) of $\mathbf{L}$ is obtained using a small subset of the rows of $\mathbf{D}$. Unlike conventional decomposition that uses the entire data, we only utilize a small data sketch, and solve two low-dimensional optimization problems in lieu of one high-dimensional matrix decomposition problem (\ref{eq2}) resulting in significant running time speed-ups.
To the best of our knowledge, it is shown here for the first time that the sufficient number of randomly sampled columns/rows scales linearly with the rank $r$ and the coherency parameter of $\mathbf{L}$ even with uniform random sampling. Also, in contrast to the existing randomized approaches \cite{new1,new2,lamport8}, which use blind uniform random sampling, we propose a new methodology for efficient column/row sampling. When the columns/rows of $\mathbf{L}$ are not distributed uniformly in the CS/RS of $\mathbf{L}$, which prevails much of the real world data, the proposed sampling approach is shown to achieve significant savings in data usage compared to uniform random sampling-based methods that require remarkable portions of the data. The proposed sampling algorithms can be independently used for feature selection from high-dimensional data.
In the presented approach, once the CS is learned, each column is decomposed efficiently and independently using the proposed randomized vector decomposition method. Unlike most existing approaches, which are batch-based, this unique feature enables applicability to online settings.
The presented vector decomposition method can be independently used in many applications as an efficient vector decomposition algorithm or for efficient linear decoding \cite{lamport17,minaee2015screen,minaee2015screenj}.
\subsection{Notation and definitions}
We use bold-face upper-case letters to denote matrices and bold-face lower-case letters to denote vectors. Given a matrix $\mathbf{L}$, $\|\mathbf{L}\|$ denotes its spectral norm, $\|\mathbf{L}\|_F $ its Frobenius norm, and $\| \mathbf{L} \|_\infty$ the infinity norm, which is equal to the maximum absolute value of its elements. In an $N$-dimensional space, $\mathbf{e}_i$ is the $i^{\text{th}}$ vector of the standard basis (i.e., the $i^{\text{th}}$ element of $\mathbf{e}_i$ is equal to one and all the other elements are equal to zero). The notation $A = [\:]$ denotes an empty matrix and the matrix $$\mathbf{A} = [ \mathbf{A}_1 \: \mathbf{A}_2 \: ... \: \mathbf{A}_n] $$
is the column-wise concatenation of the matrices $\{ \mathbf{A}_i\}_{i=1}^n$. Random sampling refers to sampling without replacement.
\section{Background and Related Work}
\subsection{Exact LR plus sparse matrix decomposition}
The incoherence of the CS and RS of $\mathbf{L}$ is an important requirement for the identifiability of the decompostion problem in (\ref{eq1}) \cite{lamport2 , lamport1}. For the LR matrix $\mathbf{L}$ with rank $r$ and compact SVD $\mathbf{L} = \mathbf{U} \mathbf{\Sigma} \mathbf{V}^T$ (where $\mathbf{U} \in \mathbb{R}^{N_1 \times r}$, $\mathbf{\Sigma} \in \mathbb{R}^{r \times r}$ and $\mathbf{V} \in \mathbb{R}^{N_2 \times r}$), the incoherence condition is typically defined through the requirements \cite{lamport1,lamport2}
\begin{eqnarray}
\begin{aligned}
& \underset{i}{\max} \|\mathbf{U}^T\mathbf{e}_i\|_2^2 \leq \frac{\mu r}{N_1} \: , \: \underset{i}{\max} \|\mathbf{V}^T\mathbf{e}_i\|_2^2 \leq \frac{\mu r}{N_2} \: \\
& \text{and} \: \: \|\mathbf{U}\mathbf{V}^T\|_{\infty} \leq \sqrt{\frac{\mu r}{N_2 N_1}}
\label{eq9}
\end{aligned}
\end{eqnarray}
for some parameter $\mu$ that bounds the projection of the standard basis $\{\mathbf{e}_i\}$ onto the CS and RS. Other useful measures for the coherency of subspaces are given in \cite{lamport3} as,
\begin{eqnarray}
\gamma(\mathbf{U}) \hspace{-0.5mm}= \hspace{-.5mm}\sqrt{N_1}
\max_{i,j} |\mathbf{U}(i,j)|, \gamma(\mathbf{V}) \hspace{-0.5mm}= \hspace{-0.5mm}\sqrt{N_2}
\max_{i,j} |\mathbf{V}(i,j)|,
\label{eq10}
\end{eqnarray}
where $\gamma(\mathbf{U})$ and $\gamma(\mathbf{V})$ bound the coherency of the CS and the RS, respectively. When some of the elements of the orthonormal basis of a subspace are too large, the subspace is coherent with the standard vectors. Actually, it is not hard to show that $\max \left( \gamma(\mathbf{V}),\gamma(\mathbf{U})\right) \leq \sqrt{\mu}$.
The decomposition of a data matrix into its LR and sparse components was analyzed in \cite{lamport1 , lamport2}, and sufficient conditions for exact recovery using the convex minimization (\ref{eq2}) were derived. In \cite{lamport2}, the sparsity pattern of the sparse matrix is selected uniformly at random following the so-called Bernoulli model to ensure that the sparse matrix is not LR with overwhelming probability. In this model, which is also used in this paper, each element of the sparse matrix can be non-zero independently with a constant probability.
Without loss of generality (w.l.o.g.), suppose that $N_2 \leq N_1$. The following lemma states the main result of \cite{lamport2}.
\begin{lemma}[\text{Adapted from \cite{lamport2}}]
Suppose that the support set of $\mathbf{S}$ follows the Bernoulli model with parameter $\rho$. The convex program (\ref{eq2}) with $\lambda=\frac{1}{\sqrt{N_1}}$ yields the exact decomposition with probability at least $1-c_1 {N_1}^{-10}$ provided that
\begin{eqnarray}
r \leq \rho_r N_2 {\mu}^{-1} \left(\log(N_1)\right)^{-2} \quad , \quad \rho \leq {\rho}_s
\label{eq12}
\end{eqnarray}
where $\rho_s$, $c_1$ and $\rho_r$ are numerical constants.
\label{lm1}
\end{lemma}
The optimization problem in (\ref{eq2}) is convex and can be solved using standard techniques such as interior point methods \cite{lamport1}. Although these methods have fast convergence rates, their usage is limited to small-size problems due to the high complexity of computing a step direction. Similar to the iterative shrinking algorithms for $\ell_1$-norm and nuclear norm minimization, a family of iterative algorithms for solving the optimization problem (\ref{eq2}) were proposed in \cite{lamport23,lamport53}. However, they also
require working with the entire data. For example, the algorithm in \cite{lamport23} requires computing the SVD of an $N_1 \times N_2 $ matrix in every iteration.
\subsection{Randomized approaches
Owing to their inherent low-dimensional structures,
the robust principal component analysis (PCA) and matrix decomposition problems can be conceivably solved using small data sketches, i.e., a small set of random observations of the data \cite{lamport16,new3,rahmani2015analysis,new2,lamport8,lamport14}.
In \cite{lamport16}, it was shown based on a simple degrees-of-freedom analysis that the LR and the sparse components can be precisely recovered using a small set of random linear measurements of $\mathbf{D}$. A convex program was proposed in \cite{lamport16} to recover these components using random matrix embedding with a polylogarithmic penalty factor in sample complexity, albeit the formulation also requires solving a high-dimensional optimization problem.
The iterative algorithms which solve (\ref{eq2}) have complexity $\mathcal{O}(N_1 N_2 r)$ per iteration since they compute the partial SVD decomposition of $N_1 \times N_2$ dimensional matrices \cite{lamport23}. To reduce complexity, GoDec \cite{zhou2011godec} uses a randomized method to efficiently compute the SVD, and the decomposition algorithm in \cite{mu2011accelerated} minimizes the rank of $\mathbf{\Phi} \mathbf{L}$ instead of $\mathbf{L}$, where $\mathbf{\Phi}$ is a random projection matrix. However, these approaches do not have provable performance guarantees and their memory requirements scale with the full data dimensions.
Another limitation of the algorithm in \cite{mu2011accelerated} is its instability since different
random projections may yield different results.
The divide-and-conquer approach in \cite{new1} (and a similar algorithm in \cite{liu2011solving}),
can achieve super-linear speedups over full-scale
matrix decomposition. This approach forms an estimate of $\mathbf{L}$ by combining two low-rank approximations obtained from submatrices formed from sampled rows and columns of $\mathbf{D}$ using the generalized Nystr\"om method \cite{goreinov1997theory}.
Our approach also achieves super-linear speedups in decomposition, yet is fundamentally different from \cite{new1} and offers several advantages for the following reasons. First, our approach is a \emph{subspace-pursuit approach} that focuses on subspace learning in a structure-preserving data sketch. Once the CS is learned, each column of the data is decomposed independently using a proposed randomized vector decomposition algorithm. Second, unlike \cite{new1}, which is a batch approach that requires to store the entire data, the structure of the proposed approach naturally lends itself to online implementation (c.f. Section \ref{sec:online}), which could be very beneficial for settings where the data comes in on the fly. Third,
while the analysis provided in \cite{new1} requires roughly $\mathcal{O} (r^2 \mu^2 \max (N_1 , N_2))$ random observations to ensure exact decomposition with high probability (whp), we show that the order of sufficient number of random observations depends linearly on the rank and the coherency parameter even if uniform random sampling is used. Fourth, the structure of the proposed approach enables us to leverage efficient sampling strategies for challenging and realistic scenarios in which the columns and rows of $\mathbf{L}$ are not uniformly distributed in their respective subspaces, or when the data exhibits additional structures (e.g. clustering structures) (c.f. Sections \ref{sec:eff_sampling},\ref{sec:alg_eff_sampling}). In such settings, the uniform random sampling used in \cite{new1} requires significantly larger amounts of data to carry out the decomposition.
\section{Structure of the Proposed Approach and Theoretical Result}
In this section, the structure of the proposed randomized decomposition method is presented. A step-by-step analysis of the proposed approach is provided and sufficient conditions for exact decomposition are derived. Theorem \ref{thm:main_result} stating the main theoretical result of the paper is presented at the end of this section. The proofs of the lemmas and the theorem are deferred to the appendix.
Let us rewrite (\ref{eq1}) as
\begin{eqnarray}
\mathbf{D}=\mathbf{U}\mathbf{Q}+\mathbf{S},
\label{eq17}
\end{eqnarray}
where $\mathbf{Q}=\boldsymbol{\Sigma} \mathbf{V} $.
The representation matrix $\mathbf{Q} \in \mathbb{R}^{r \times N_2} $ is a full row rank matrix that contains the expansion of the columns of $\mathbf{L}$ in the orthonormal basis $\mathbf{U}$.
The first step of the proposed
approach aims to learn the CS of $\mathbf{L}$ using a subset of the columns of $\mathbf{D}$, and in the second step the representation matrix is obtained using a subset of the rows of $\mathbf{D}$.
Let $\:\mathcal{U}$ denote the CS of $\mathbf{L}$. Fundamentally, $\mathcal{U}$ can be obtained from a small subset of the columns of $\mathbf{L}$. However, since we do not have direct access to the LR matrix, a random subset of the columns of $\mathbf{D}$ is first selected. Hence, the matrix of sampled columns $\mathbf{D}_{s1}$ can be written as
$\mathbf{D}_{s1}=\mathbf{D} \mathbf{S}_{1}$,
where $\mathbf{S}_1 \in \mathbb{R}^{N_2 \times m_1} $ is the column sampling matrix and $m_1$ is the number of selected columns. The matrix of selected columns can be written as
\begin{eqnarray}
\mathbf{D}_{s1}=\mathbf{L}_{s1} + \mathbf{S}_{s1},
\label{eq19}
\end{eqnarray}
\textcolor{black}{where $\mathbf{L}_{s1}$ and $\mathbf{S}_{s1}$ are its LR and sparse components, respectively.
The idea is to decompose the sketch $\mathbf{D}_{s1}$ into its LR and sparse components to learn the CS of $\mathbf{L}$ from the CS of $\mathbf{L}_{s1}$.
Note that the columns of $\mathbf{L}_{s1}$ are a subset of the columns of $\mathbf{L}$ since $\mathbf{L}_{s1} = \mathbf{L} \mathbf{S}_1$. Should we be able to decompose $\mathbf{D}_{s1}$ into its exact LR and sparse components (c.f. Lemma \ref{lm4}), we also need to ensure that the columns of $\mathbf{L}_{s1}$ span $\mathcal{U}$. The following lemma establishes that a small subset of the columns of $\mathbf{D}$ sampled uniformly at random contains sufficient information (i.e., the columns of the LR component of the sampled data span $\mathcal{U}$) if the RS is incoherent.
}
\begin{lemma}
Suppose $m_1$ columns are sampled uniformly at random from the matrix $\mathbf{L}$ with rank $r$. If
\begin{eqnarray}
m_1 \ge r\gamma^2 (\mathbf{V}) \max \left( c_2 \log r , c_3 \log\left(\frac{3}{\delta}\right) \right),
\label{eq27}
\end{eqnarray}
then the selected columns of the matrix $\mathbf{L}$ span the columns subspace of $\mathbf{L}$ with probability at least $(1-\delta)$ where $c_2$ and $c_3$ are numerical constants.
\label{lm3}
\end{lemma}
Thus, if $\gamma (\mathbf{V})$ is small (i.e., the RS is not coherent), a small set of randomly sampled columns can span $\mathcal{U}$. According to Lemma \ref{lm3}, if $m_1$ satisfies (\ref{eq27}), then $\mathbf{L}$ and $\mathbf{L}_{s1}$ have the same CS whp. The following optimization problem (of dimensionality $N_1 m_1$) is solved to decompose $\mathbf{D}_{s1}$ into its LR and sparse components.
\begin{eqnarray}
\begin{aligned}
& \underset{\dot{\mathbf{L}}_{s1},\dot{\mathbf{S}}_{s1}}{\min}
& & \frac{1}{\sqrt{N_1}}\| \dot{\mathbf{S}}_{s1} \|_1 + \| \dot{\mathbf{L}}_{s1} \|_* \\
& \text{subject to}
& & \dot{\mathbf{L}}_{s1} + \dot{\mathbf{S}}_{s1} = \mathbf{D}_{s1} . \\
\end{aligned}
\label{eq20}
\end{eqnarray}
Thus, the columns subspace of the LR matrix can be recovered by finding the columns subspace of $ \mathbf{L}_{s1} $. Our next lemma establishes that (\ref{eq20}) yields the exact decomposition using roughly $m_1 = \mathcal{O} (\mu r)$ randomly sampled columns. To simplify the analysis, in the following lemma it is assumed that the CS of the LR
matrix is sampled from the random orthogonal model \cite{lamport4}, i.e., the columns of $\mathbf{U}$ are selected
uniformly at random among all families of $r$-orthonormal vectors.
\begin{lemma}
Suppose the columns subspace of $\mathbf{L}$ is sampled from the random orthogonal model, $\mathbf{L}_{s1}$ has the same column subspace of $\mathbf{L}$ and the support set of $\mathbf{S}$ follows the Bernoulli model with parameter $\rho$. In addition, assume that the columns of $\mathbf{D}_{s1}$ were sampled uniformly at random. If
\begin{eqnarray}
m_1 \ge {\frac{r}{\rho}_r} \mu^{'} (\log N_1)^2 \: \: \: \text{and} \: \: \: \rho \leq \rho_s \:,
\label{eq28}
\end{eqnarray}
then (\ref{eq20}) yields the exact decomposition with probability at least $1-c_8 N_1^{-3}$, where
\begin{eqnarray}
\mu^{'} \hspace{-1.5mm} = \hspace{-.5mm} \max \hspace{-.75mm}\left( \hspace{-.75mm}\frac{c_7 \max (r,\log N_1)}{r} , 6\gamma^2(\mathbf{V}) , (c_9\gamma(\mathbf{V}) \log N_1)^2 \hspace{-.75mm}\right)
\label{eq30}
\end{eqnarray}
and $c_7$, $c_8$ and $c_9$ are constant numbers provided that $N_1$ is greater than the RHS of first inequality of (\ref{eq28}).
\label{lm4}
\end{lemma}
Therefore, according to Lemma \ref{lm4} and Lemma \ref{lm3}, the CS of $\mathbf{L}$ can be obtained using roughly $O(r \mu)$ uniformly sampled data columns. Note that $m_1 \ll N_1$ for high-dimensional data as $m_1$ scales linearly with $r$. Hence, the requirement that $N_1$ is also greater than the RHS of first inequality of (\ref{eq28}) is by no means restrictive and is naturally satisfied.
Suppose that (\ref{eq20}) decomposes $ \mathbf{D}_{s1} $ into its exact components and assume that $\mathcal{U}$ has been correctly identified. W.l.o.g., we can use $ \mathbf{U}$ as an orthonormal basis for the learned CS.
An arbitrary column $\mathbf{d}_i$ of $\mathbf{D}$ can be written as $\mathbf{d}_i = \mathbf{U} \mathbf{q}_i + \mathbf{s}_i$, where $\mathbf{q}_i$ and $\mathbf{s}_i$ are the corresponding columns of $\mathbf{Q}$ and $\mathbf{S}$, respectively. Thus, $\mathbf{d}_i - \mathbf{U} \mathbf{q}_i$ is a sparse vector. This suggests that $\mathbf{q}_i$ can be learned using the minimization
\begin{eqnarray}
\underset{\hat{\mathbf{q}_i}}{\min} \|\mathbf{d}_i-\mathbf{U} \hat{\mathbf{q}_i}\|_1 \:,
\label{firstrow}
\end{eqnarray}
where the $\ell_1$-norm is used as a surrogate for the $\ell_0$-norm to promote a sparse solution \cite{lamport17 , lamport3}.
The optimization problem (\ref{firstrow}) is similar to a system of linear equations with $r$ unknown variables and $N_1$ equations. Since $r \ll N_1$, the idea is to learn $\mathbf{q}_i$ using only a small subset of the equations. Thus, we propose the following vector decomposition program
\begin{eqnarray}
\underset{\hat{\mathbf{q}_i}}{\min} \|\mathbf{S}_2^T \mathbf{d}_i- \mathbf{S}_2^T \mathbf{U} \hat{\mathbf{q}_i}\|_1 \:,
\label{n_eq1}
\label{secondrows}
\end{eqnarray}
where $\mathbf{S}_2 \in \mathbb{R}^{N_1 \times m_2} $ selects $m_2$ rows of $\mathbf{U}$ (and the corresponding $m_2$ elements of $\mathbf{d}_i$).
First, we have to ensure that the rank of $\mathbf{S}_2^T \mathbf{U}$ is equal to the rank of $\mathbf{U}$, for if $\mathbf{q}^{*}$ is the optimal point of (\ref{secondrows}), then $\mathbf{U} \mathbf{q}^{*}$ will be the LR component of $\mathbf{d}_i$. According to Lemma \ref{lm3}, $m_2 = \mathcal{O} (r \gamma(\mathbf{U}))$, is sufficient to preserve the rank of $\mathbf{U}$ when the rows are sampled uniformly at random.
In addition, the following lemma establishes that if the rank of $\mathbf{U}$ is equal to the rank of $\mathbf{S}_2^T \mathbf{U}$, then the sufficient value of $m_2$ for (\ref{n_eq1}) to yield the correct columns of $\mathbf{Q}$ whp is linear in $r$.
\begin{lemma}
Suppose that the rank of $\mathbf{S}_2^T \mathbf{U}$ is equal to the rank of $\mathbf{L}$ and assume that the CS of $\mathbf{L}$ is sampled from the random orthogonal model. The optimal point of (\ref{secondrows}) is equal to $\mathbf{q}_i$ with probability at least $(1-3\delta)$ provided that
\begin{eqnarray}
\begin{aligned}
&\rho \leq \frac{0.5}{r \beta \left( c_6 \kappa \log \frac{N_1 }{\delta} + 1 \right)}~, \\
&m_2 \ge \max \bigg( \frac{ 2 r \beta (\beta - 2) \log \left( \frac{ 1 }{\delta} \right)}{3(\beta - 1)^2} \left( c_6 \kappa \log \frac{N_1 }{\delta} +1 \right) , \\
&\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad c_5 (\log \frac{N_1 }{\delta})^2 , \sqrt[6]{\frac{3}{\delta}} \bigg)
\end{aligned}
\label{eq38}
\end{eqnarray}
where $\kappa= \frac{\log N_1}{r}$, $c_5$ and $c_6$ are constant numbers and $\beta$ can be any real number greater than one.
\label{lm8}
\end{lemma}
Therefore, we can obtain the LR component of each column using a random subset of its elements. Since (\ref{firstrow}) is an $\ell_1$-norm minimization, we can write the representation matrix learning problem as
\begin{eqnarray}
\underset{\hat{\mathbf{Q}}}{\min} \| \mathbf{S}_2^T \mathbf{D}- \mathbf{S}_2^T \mathbf{U} \hat{\mathbf{Q}}\|_1.
\label{eq23}
\end{eqnarray}
Thus, (\ref{eq23}) learns $\mathbf{Q}$ using a subset of the rows of $\mathbf{D}$ as $\mathbf{S}_2^T \mathbf{D}$ is the matrix formed from $m_2$ sampled rows of $\mathbf{D}$.
As such, we solve two low-dimensional subspace pursuit problems (\ref{eq20}) and (\ref{eq23}) of dimensions $N_1 m_1$ and $N_2 m_2$, respectively, instead of an $N_1 N_2$-dimensional decomposition problem (\ref{eq2}), and use a small random subset of the data to learn $\mathbf{U}$ and $\mathbf{Q}$.
The table of Algorithm 1 explains the structure of the proposed approach.
We can readily state the following theorem which establishes sufficient conditions for Algorithm 1 to yield exact decomposition. In this theorem, it is assumed that the columns and rows are sampled uniformly at random. In the next section, an efficient method for column and row sampling is presented. In addition, a scheme for online implementation is proposed.
\begin{theorem}
\label{thm:main_result}
Suppose the columns subspace of the LR matrix is sampled from the random orthogonal model and the support set of $\mathbf{S}$ follows the Bernoulli model with parameter $\rho$. In addition, it is assumed that Algorithm 1 samples the columns and rows uniformly at random. If for any small $\delta > 0$,
\begin{eqnarray}
\begin{aligned}
m_1 & \ge \max \Bigg ( r\gamma^2(\mathbf{V}) \max \left( c_2 \log r , c_3 \log \frac{3}{\delta} \right),\\
& \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad {\frac{r}{\rho}_r} \mu^{'} (\log N_1)^2 \hspace{-0.85mm}\Bigg)\\
m_2 & \ge \max \Bigg( r \log N_1 \max \big( c_2^{'} \log r , c_3^{'} \log \frac{3}{\delta} \big), \\
& \qquad \frac{ 2 r \beta (\beta - 2)\log \left( \frac{N_2}{\delta} \right)}{3 (\beta - 1)^2} \left( c_6 \kappa \log \frac{N_1 N_2}{\delta} +1 \right) ,\\
& \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad c_5 (\log \frac{N_1 N_2}{\delta})^2 , \sqrt[6]{\frac{3}{\delta}} \Bigg)\\
\rho &\leq \min \left( \rho_s , \frac{0.5}{r \beta \left( c_6 \kappa \log \frac{N_1 N_2}{\delta} + 1 \right) } \right)
\end{aligned}
\label{eq25}
\end{eqnarray}
where
\begin{align}
\mu^{'} &= \max \bigg( \frac{c_7 \max (r,\log N_1)}{r} , 6\gamma^2 (\mathbf{V}) ,
\left(c_9 \gamma (\mathbf{V}) \log N_1 \right)^2 \bigg), \nonumber \\
\kappa &= \frac{\log N_1}{r},\nonumber
\label{eq26}
\end{align}
$\{c_i\}_{i=1}^9$, $c_2^{'}$ and $c_3^{'}$ are constant numbers and $\beta$ is any real number greater that one, then the proposed approach (Algorithm 1) yields the exact decomposition with probability at least $(1-5\delta - 3r N_1^{-7})$ provided that $N_1$ is greater than the RHS of first inequality of (\ref{eq28}).
\end{theorem}
Theorem (\ref{thm:main_result}) guarantees that the LR component can be obtained using a small subset of the data.
The randomized approach has two main advantages. First, it significantly reduces the memory/storage requirements since it only uses a small data sketch and solves two low-dimensional optimization problems versus one large problem. Second, the proposed approach has $\mathcal{O}(\max (N_1 , N_2) \times \max(m_1 , m_2) \times r)$ per-iteration running time complexity, which is significantly lower than $\mathcal{O}(N_1 N_2 r)$ per iteration for full scale decomposition (\ref{eq2}) \cite{lamport53 , lamport23} implying remarkable speedups for big data. For instance, consider $\mathbf{U}$ and $\mathbf{Q}$ sampled from $\mathcal{N} (0 , 1)$, $r = 5$, and $\mathbf{S}$ following the Bernoulli model with $\rho = 0.02$. For values of $N_1 = N_2$ equal to 500, 1000, 5000, $10^4$ and $2\times 10^4$, if $m_1 = m_2 = 10r$, the proposed approach yields the correct decomposition with 90, 300, 680, 1520 and 4800 - fold speedup, respectively, over directly solving (\ref{eq2}).
%
\begin{algorithm}
\caption{Structure of Proposed Approach}
{\footnotesize
\textbf{Input}: Data matrix $\mathbf{D} \in \mathbb{R}^{N_1 \times N_2} $\\
\textbf{1. Initialization}: Form column sampling matrix $\mathbf{S}_1 \in \mathbb{R}^{N_2 \times m_1} $ and row sampling matrix $\mathbf{S}_2 \in \mathbb{R}^{N_1 \times m_2} $.\\
\textbf{2. CS Learning}\\
\textbf{2.1} Column sampling: Matrix $\mathbf{S}_1$ samples $m_1$ columns of the given data matrix, $\mathbf{D}_{s1} = \mathbf{D} \mathbf{S}_1$. \\
\textbf{2.2} CS learning: The convex program (\ref{eq20}) is applied to the sampled columns $\mathbf{D}_{s1}$. \\
\textbf{2.3} CS calculation: The CS is found as the columns subspace of the calculated LR component. \\
\textbf{3. Representation Matrix Learning}\\
\textbf{3.1} Row sampling: Matrix $\mathbf{S}_2$ samples $m_2$ rows of the given data matrix, $\mathbf{D}_{s2} = \mathbf{S}_2^T \mathbf{D}$.\\
\textbf{3.2} Representation matrix learning: The convex problem (\ref{eq23}) is applied to the sampled rows to find the representation matrix. \\%\\
\textbf{Output:} If $\hat{\mathbf{U}}$ is an orthonormal basis for the learned CS and $\hat{\mathbf{Q}}$ is the obtained representation matrix, then $\hat{\mathbf{L}} = \hat{\mathbf{U}} \hat{\mathbf{Q}}$ is the obtained LR component.
}
\end{algorithm}
\section{Efficient Column/Row Sampling}
In sharp contrast to randomized algorithms for matrix approximations rooted in numerical linear algebra (NLA) \cite{ghadim1,mahoney2011randomized}, which seek to compute matrix approximations from sampled data using importance sampling, in matrix decomposition and robust PCA we do not have direct access to the LR matrix to measure how informative particular columns/rows are. As such, the existing randomized algorithms for matrix decomposition and robust PCA\cite{new1 , new2, new3 , lamport8} have predominantly relied upon uniform random sampling of columns/rows.
In Section \ref{sec:non_uniform}, we briefly describe the implications of non-uniform data distribution and show that uniform random sampling may not be favorable for data matrices exhibiting some structures that prevail much of the real datasets. In Section \ref{sec:eff_sampling}, we demonstrate an efficient column sampling strategy which will be integrated with the proposed decomposition method. The decomposition method with efficient column/row sampling is presented in Sections \ref{sec:alg_eff_sampling} and \ref{sec:both_col_row}.
\subsection{Non-uniform data distribution}
\label{sec:non_uniform}
When data points lie in a low-dimensional subspace, a small subset of the points can span the subspace. However, uniform random sampling is only effective when the data points are distributed uniformly in the subspace. To clarify, Fig.~\ref{fig:innovationfig} shows two scenarios for a set of data points in a two-dimensional subspace. In the left plot, the data points are distributed uniformly at random.
In this case, two randomly sampled data points can span the subspace whp. In the right plot, 95 percent of the data lie on a one-dimensional subspace, thus we may not be able to capture the two-dimensional subspace from a small random subset of the data points.
\begin{figure
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.41\textwidth]{distribution}
\vspace{-0.3cm}
\caption{Data distributions in a two-dimensional subspace. The red points are the normalized data points.}
\label{fig:innovationfig}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.3\textwidth]{rank}
\vspace{-0.25cm}
\caption{The rank of a set of uniformly random sampled columns for different number of clusters. }
\label{fig:mumv}
\end{figure}
In practice, the data points in a low-dimensional subspace may not be uniformly distributed, but rather exhibit some additional structures.
A prevailing structure in many modern applications is clustered data \cite{new5,rahmani2015innovation}. For example, user ratings for certain products (e.g. movies) in recommender systems are not only LR due to their inherent correlations, but also exhibit additional clustering structures owing to the similarity of the preferences of individuals from similar backgrounds (e.g. education, culture, or gender) \cite{new5,7389496}.
To further show that uniform random sampling falls short when the data points are not distributed uniformly in the subspace, consider a
matrix $\mathbf{G} \in \mathbb{R}^{2000 \times 6150}$ generated as
$
\mathbf{G} = [ \mathbf{G}_1 \: \mathbf{G}_2 \: ... \: \mathbf{G}_n ] \:
$. For $1 \leq i \leq \frac{n}{2}$, $\mathbf{G}_i = \mathbf{U}_i \mathbf{Q}_i\: ,$
where $\mathbf{U}_i \in \mathbb{R}^{2000 \times \frac{r}{n}}$, $\mathbf{Q}_i \in \mathbb{R}^{\frac{r}{n} \times \frac{200 r}{n}}$. For $n/2+1 \leq i \leq n$, $\mathbf{G}_i = \mathbf{U}_i \mathbf{Q}_i\: ,$
where $\mathbf{U}_i \in \mathbb{R}^{2000 \times \frac{r}{n}}$, $\mathbf{Q}_i \in \mathbb{R}^{\frac{r}{n} \times \frac{5 r}{n}}$.
The elements of $\mathbf{U}_i$ and $\mathbf{Q}_i$ are sampled independently from a normal $\mathcal{N}(0 , 1)$ distribution.
The parameter $r$ is set equal to 60, thus, the rank of $\mathbf{G}$ is equal to 60 whp. Fig.~\ref{fig:mumv} illustrates the rank of the randomly sampled columns versus the number of sampled columns for different number of clusters $n$. As $n$ increases, so does the required number of uniformly sampled columns. When $n=60$, it turns out that we need to sample more than half of the columns to span the CS.
As such, we cannot evade high-dimensionality with uniform random column/row sampling.
In \cite{new5}, it was shown that the RS coherency increases when the columns follow a more clustered distribution, and vice-versa. These observations match our theoretical result in Lemma \ref{lm3}, which established that the sufficient number of randomly sampled columns depends linearly on the coherency parameter of the RS.
\subsection{Efficient column sampling method}
\label{sec:eff_sampling}
Column sampling is
widely used for dimensionality reduction and feature selection \cite{lamport14,lamport26,new4}.
In the column sampling problem, the LR matrix (or the matrix whose span is to be approximated with a small set of its columns) is available. Thus, the columns are sampled based on their importance, measured by the so-called leverage scores \cite{ghadim1}, as opposed to blind uniform sampling.
We refer the reader to \cite{lamport14 , new4} and references therein for more information about efficient column sampling methods.
\textcolor{black}{Next, we present a sampling approach which will be used in Section \ref{sec:alg_eff_sampling} where the proposed decomposition algorithm with efficient sampling is presented.
The proposed sampling strategy is inspired by the approach in \cite{new4} in the context of volume sampling.
The table of Algorithm 2 details the presented column sampling procedure. Given a matrix $\mathbf{A}$ with rank $r_A$, the algorithm aims to sample a small subset of the columns of $\mathbf{A}$ that span its CS. The first column is sampled uniformly at random or based on a judiciously chosen probability distribution \cite{ghadim1}. The next columns are selected sequentially so as to maximize the novelty to the span of the selected columns. As shown in step 2.2 of Algorithm 2, a design threshold $\tau$ is used to decide whether a given column brings sufficient novelty to the sampled columns by thresholding the $\ell_2$-norm of its projection on the complement of the span of the sampled columns. The threshold $\tau$ is naturally set to zero in a noise-free setting. Once the selected columns are believed to span the CS of $\mathbf{A}$, they are removed from $\mathbf{A}$. This procedure is repeated $C$ times (using the remaining columns). In each time, the algorithm finds $r$ columns which span the CS of $\mathbf{A}$. After every iteration, the rank of the matrix of remaining columns is bounded above by $r_A$. As such, the algorithm samples approximately $m_1 \approx C r_A$ columns in total.
In the proposed decomposition method with efficient column/row sampling (presented in Section \ref{sec:alg_eff_sampling}), we set $C$ large enough to ensure that the selected columns form a low rank matrix. }
\begin{algorithm}
\caption{Efficient Sampling from LR Matrices}
{\footnotesize
\textbf{Input:} Matrix $\mathbf{A}$. \\
\textbf{1. Initialize}\\
\textbf{1.1} The parameter $C$ is chosen as an integer greater than or equal to one. The algorithm finds $C$ sets of linearly dependent columns. \\
\textbf{1.2} Set $\mathcal{I} = \emptyset $ as the index set of the sampled columns and set $v = \tau$, $\mathbf{B} = \mathbf{A}$ and $\mathbf{C} = [\:]$. \\
\textcolor{black}{ \textbf{2. Repeat} C Times}
\\
\textbf{2.1} Let $\mathbf{b}$ be a non-zero randomly sampled column from $\mathbf{B}$ with index $i_b$. Update $\mathbf{C}$ and $\mathcal{I}$ as $\mathbf{C} = [\mathbf{C} \: \: \mathbf{b}]$, $\mathcal{I} = \{ \mathcal{I} \: , \: i_b \}$. \\
\textbf{2.2} \textbf{While $v \ge \tau$}\\
\textbf{2.2.1} Set $\mathbf{E} = \mathbf{P}_c \mathbf{B} \: , $
where $\mathbf{P}_c$ is the projection matrix onto the complement space of $\spn(\mathbf{C})$. \\
\textbf{2.2.2} Define $\mathbf{f}$ as the column of $\mathbf{E}$ with the maximum $\ell_2$-norm with index $i_f$. Update $\mathbf{C}$, $\mathcal{I}$ and $v$ as $\mathbf{C} = [\mathbf{C} \: \: \: \mathbf{f}] \: \: , \: \: \mathcal{I} = \{ \mathcal{I} \: , \: i_f \} \: \: \text{and} \:\: v = \| \mathbf{f} \|_2 \: . $\\
\textbf{2.2 End While}\\
\textbf{2.3} Set $\mathbf{C} = [\:]$ and set $\mathbf{B}$ equal to $\mathbf{A}$ with the columns indexed by $\mathcal{I}$ set to zero. \\
\textcolor{black}{ \textbf{2. End Repeat}}
\\
\textbf{Output:} The set $\mathcal{I}$ contains the indices of the selected columns.
}
\end{algorithm}
\begin{figure}[t!]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.44\textwidth]{blck1}
\vspace{-0.3cm}
\caption{Visualization of the matrices defined in Section \ref{sec:alg_eff_sampling}. Matrix $\mathbf{D}_w$ is selected randomly or using Algorithm 3 described in Section \ref{sec:both_col_row}.}
\label{fig: visula 1}
\end{figure}
\subsection{Proposed decomposition algorithm with efficient sampling}
\label{sec:alg_eff_sampling}
In this section, we develop a modified decomposition algorithm that replaces uniform random sampling with the efficient column/row sampling method (Algorithm 2). In Section \ref{sec:sim}, it is shown that the proposed technique can remarkably reduce the sampling requirement. We consider a setting wherein the data points (the columns of $\mathbf{L}$) are not uniformly distributed, rather they admit an additional structure (such as clustering), wherefore a small subset of uniformly sampled columns is not likely to span the CS. However, we assume that the \emph{rows} of $\mathbf{L}$ are distributed well enough, in the sense that they do not much align along any specific directions, such that $C_r r$ rows of $\mathbf{L}$ sampled uniformly at random span its RS whp, for some constant $C_r$. In Section \ref{sec:both_col_row}, we dispense with this assumption.
The proposed decomposition algorithm rests on three key ideas detailed next.
\subsubsection{Informative column sampling}
The first important idea underlying the proposed sampling approach is to start sampling along the dimension that has the better distribution. For instance, in the example considered in Section \ref{sec:non_uniform}, the columns of $\mathbf{G}$ admit a clustering structure. However, the CS of $\mathbf{G}$ is a random $r$-dimensional subspace, which means that the rows of $\mathbf{G}$ are distributed uniformly at random in the RS of $\mathbf{G}$. Thus, in this case we start with row sampling. The main intuition is that while almost 60 randomly sampled rows of $\mathbf{G}$ span the RS, a considerable portion of the columns (almost 4000) should be sampled to capture the CS as shown in Fig. \ref{fig:mumv}.
As another example, consider an extreme scenario where only two columns of $\mathbf{G} \in \mathbb{R}^{1000 \times 1000}$ are non-zero. In this case, with random sampling we need to sample almost all the columns to ensure that the sampled columns span the CS of $\mathbf{G}$.
But, if the non-zero columns are non-sparse, a small subset of randomly chosen rows of $\mathbf{G}$ will span its row space.
Let $\hat{r}$ denote a known upper bound on $r$. Such knowledge is often available as side information depending on the particular application. For instance, facial images under varying illumination and facial expressions are known to lie on a special
low-dimensional subspace \cite{wright2009robust}.
For visualization, Fig. \ref{fig: visula 1} provides a simplified illustration of the matrices defined in this section. We sample $C_r \hat{r}$ rows of $\mathbf{D}$ uniformly at random. Let $\mathbf{D}_w \in \mathbb{R}^{ (C_r \hat{r}) \times N_2 }$ denote the matrix of sampled rows. We choose $C_r$ sufficiently large to ensure that the non-sparse component of $\mathbf{D}_w$ is a LR matrix. Define $\mathbf{L}_w$, assumably with rank $r$, as the LR component of $\mathbf{D}_w$.
If we locate a subset of the columns of $\mathbf{L}_w$ that span its CS, the corresponding columns of $\mathbf{L}$ would span its CS. To this end, the convex program (\ref{eq2}) is applied to $\mathbf{D}_w$ to extract its LR component denoted $\hat{\mathbf{L}}_w$. Then, Algorithm 2 is applied to $\hat{\mathbf{L}}_w$ to find a set of informative columns
by sampling $m_1 \approx C \hat{r}$ columns. In Remark \ref{rem:how_to_choose_c}, we discuss how to choose $C$ in the algorithm. Define $\hat{\mathbf{L}}_w^s$ as the matrix of columns selected from $\hat{\mathbf{L}}_w$. The matrix $\mathbf{D}_{s1}$ is formed using the
columns of $\mathbf{D}$ corresponding to the sampled columns of $\hat{\mathbf{L}}_w$.
\subsubsection{CS learning}
Similar to the CS learning step of Algorithm 1, we can obtain the CS of $\mathbf{L}$ by decomposing $\mathbf{D}_{s1}$. However, we propose to leverage valuable information in the matrix $\hat{\mathbf{L}}_w^s$ in decomposing $\mathbf{D}_{s1}$. In particular, if $\mathbf{D}_w$ is decomposed correctly, the RS of $\hat{\mathbf{L}}_w^s$ would be same as that of $\mathbf{L}_{s1}$ given that the rank of $\mathbf{L}_w$ is equal to $r$. Let $\mathbf{V}_{s1}$ be an orthonormal basis for the RS of $\hat{\mathbf{L}}_w^s$. Thus, in order to learn the CS of $\mathbf{D}_{s1}$, we only need to solve
\begin{eqnarray}
\underset{\hat{\mathbf{U}}}{\min} \| \mathbf{D}_{s1} - \hat{\mathbf{U}} \mathbf{V}_{s1}^T \|_1 \:.
\label{eq:columnspaceler}
\end{eqnarray}
\begin{remark}
\label{rem:how_to_choose_c}
Define $\mathbf{d}_{s1}^i$ as the $i^{\text{th}}$ row of $\mathbf{D}_{s1}$. According to (\ref{eq:columnspaceler}), $\mathbf{U}^i$ (the $i^{\text{th}}$ row of $\mathbf{U}$) is obtained as the optimal point of
\begin{eqnarray}
\underset{\hat{\mathbf{U}}^i}{\min} \| (\mathbf{d}_{s1}^i)^T - \mathbf{V}_{s1} (\hat{\mathbf{U}}^i)^T \|_1 \: .
\label{eq_jobr}
\end{eqnarray}
Based on the analysis provided for the proof of Lemma \ref{lm8}, the optimal point of (\ref{eq_jobr}) is equal to $\mathbf{U}^i$ if $m_1 \ge r + \eta \| \mathbf{S}_{s1}^i \|_0 $, where $\mathbf{S}_{s1}^i$ is the $i^{\text{th}}$ row of $\mathbf{S}_{s1}$, $\|\mathbf{S}_{s1}^i\|_0$ the number of non-zero elements of $\mathbf{S}_{s1}^i$, and $\eta$ a real number which depends on the coherency of the subspace spanned by $\mathbf{V}_{s1}$. Thus, here $C$ is determined based on the rank of $\mathbf{L}$ and the sparsity of $\mathbf{S}$, i.e., $C r - r$ has to be sufficiently greater than the expected value for the number of non-zero elements of the rows of $\mathbf{S}_{s1}$.
\end{remark}
\begin{remark}
We note that the convex algorithm (\ref{eq2}) may not always yield accurate decomposition of $\mathbf{D}_w$ since structured data may not be sufficiently incoherent \cite{lamport1 , new5} suggesting that the decomposition step can be further improved. Let $\mathbf{D}_w^s$ be the matrix consisting of the columns of $\mathbf{D}_w$ corresponding to the columns selected from $\hat{\mathbf{L}}_w$ to form $\hat{\mathbf{L}}_w^s$. According to our investigations, an improved $\mathbf{V}_{s1}$ can be obtained by applying the decomposition algorithm presented in \cite{lamport19} to $\mathbf{D}_w^s$ then use the RS of $\hat{\mathbf{L}}_w^s$ as an initial guess for the RS of the non-sparse component of $\mathbf{D}_w^s$. Since $\mathbf{D}_w^s$ is low-dimensional \textcolor{black}{(roughly $\mathcal{O}(r) \times \mathcal{O}(r)$ dimensional matrix)}, this extra step is a low complexity operation.
\end{remark}
\subsubsection{Representation matrix learning}
Suppose that the CS of $\mathbf{L}$ was learned correctly, i.e., the span of the optimal point of (\ref{eq:columnspaceler}) is equal to the span of $\mathbf{U}$. Thus, we use $\mathbf{U}$ as a basis for the learned CS. Now we leverage the information embedded in $\mathbf{U}$ to select the informative rows. Algorithm 2 is applied to $\mathbf{U}^T$ to locate $m_2 \approx C r$ rows of $\mathbf{U}$. Thus, we form the matrix $\mathbf{D}_{s2}$ from the rows of $\mathbf{D}$ corresponding to the selected rows of $\mathbf{U}$. Thus, the representation matrix is learned as
\begin{eqnarray}
\underset{\hat{\mathbf{Q}}}{\min} \| \mathbf{D}_{s2} - \mathbf{U}_{s2} \hat{\mathbf{Q}} \|_1 \: ,
\end{eqnarray}
where $\mathbf{U}_{s2} \in \mathbb{R}^{m_2 \times r}$ is the matrix of the selected rows of $\mathbf{U}$. Subsequently, the LR matrix can be obtained from the learned CS and the representation matrix.
\subsection{Column/Row sampling from sparsely corrupted data}
\label{sec:both_col_row}
In Section \ref{sec:alg_eff_sampling}, we assumed that the LR component of $\mathbf{D}_w$ has rank $r$. However, if the rows are not well-distributed,
a reasonably sized random subset of the rows may not span the RS of $\mathbf{L}$. Here, we present a sampling approach which can find the informative columns/rows even when both the columns and the rows exhibit clustering structures such that a small random subset of the columns/rows of $\mathbf{L}$ cannot span its CS/RS. The algorithm presented in this section (Algorithm 3) can be independently used as an efficient sampling approach from big data. In this paper, we use Algorithm 3 to form $\mathbf{D}_w$ if both the columns and rows exhibit clustering structures.
The table of Algorithm 3, Fig. \ref{alg3} and its caption provide the details of the proposed sampling approach and the definitions of the used matrices. We start the cycle from the position marked ``I'' in Fig. \ref{alg3} with $\mathbf{D}_w$ formed according to the initialization step of Algorithm 3. For ease of exposition, assume that $\hat{\mathbf{L}}_w = \mathbf{L}_w$ and $\hat{\mathbf{L}}_c = \mathbf{L}_c$, i.e., $\mathbf{D}_w$ and $\mathbf{D}_c$ are decomposed correctly.
The matrix $\hat{\mathbf{L}}_w^s$ is the informative columns of $\hat{\mathbf{L}}_w$. Thus, the rank of $\hat{\mathbf{L}}_w^s$ is equal to the rank of $\hat{\mathbf{L}}_w$. Since $\hat{\mathbf{L}}_w = \mathbf{L}_w$, $\hat{\mathbf{L}}_w^s$ is a subset of the rows of $\mathbf{L}_c$. If the rows of $\mathbf{L}$ exhibit a clustering structure, it is likely that rank$(\hat{\mathbf{L}}_w^s)< \text{rank} (\mathbf{L}_c)$. Thus, rank$({\mathbf{L}}_w)< \text{rank} (\mathbf{L}_c)$.
We continue one cycle of the algorithm by going through steps 1, 2 and 3 of Fig. \ref{alg3} to update $\mathbf{D}_w$. Using a similar argument, we see that the rank of an updated $\mathbf{L}_w$ will be greater than the rank of $\mathbf{L}_c$. Thus, if we run more cycles of the algorithm -- each time updating $\mathbf{D}_w$ and $\mathbf{D}_c$ -- the rank of $\mathbf{L}_w$ and $\mathbf{L}_c$ will increase.
As detailed in the table of Algorithm 3, we stop if the dimension of the span of the obtained LR component does not change in $T$ consecutive iterations. While there is no guarantee that the rank of $\mathbf{L}_w$ will converge to $r$ (it can converge to a value smaller than $r$), our investigations have shown that Algorithm 3 performs quite well and the RS of $\mathbf{L}_w$ converges to the RS of $\mathbf{L}$ in few steps. We have also found that adding some randomly sampled columns (rows) to $\mathbf{D}_c (\mathbf{D}_w)$ can effectively avert converging to a lower dimensional subspace.
For instance, some randomly sampled columns can be added to $\mathbf{D}_c$, which was obtained by applying Algorithm 2 to $\hat{\mathbf{L}}_w$.
\begin{algorithm}
\caption{\textcolor{black}{Efficient Column/Row Sampling from Sparsely Corrupted LR Matrices}}
{\footnotesize
\textbf{1. Initialization}\\
Form $\mathbf{D}_{w} \in \mathbb{R}^{C_r \hat{r} \times N_2}$ by randomly choosing $C_r \hat{r}$ rows of $\mathbf{D}$. Initialize $k = 1$ and set $T$ equal to an integer greater than 1.
\\
\textbf{2. While} $k > 0$
\\
\textbf{2.1 Sample the most informative columns}
\\
\textbf{2.1.1} Obtain $\hat{\mathbf{L}}_w$ via (\ref{eq2}) as the LR component of $\mathbf{D}_w$. \\
\textbf{2.1.2} Apply Algorithm 2 to $\hat{\mathbf{L}}_w$ with $C = C_r$. \\
\textbf{2.1.3} Form the matrix $\mathbf{D}_c$ from the columns of $\mathbf{D}$ corresponding to the sampled columns of $\hat{\mathbf{L}}_w$.
\\
\textbf{2.2 Sample the most informative rows}
\\
\textbf{2.2.1} Obtain $\hat{\mathbf{L}}_c$ via (\ref{eq2}) as the LR component of $\mathbf{D}_c$. \\
\textbf{2.2.2} Apply Algorithm 2 to $\hat{\mathbf{L}}_c^T$ with $C = C_r$.\\
\textbf{2.2.3} Form the matrix $\mathbf{D}_w$ from the rows of $\mathbf{D}$ corresponding to the sampled rows of $\hat{\mathbf{L}}_c$. \\
\textbf{2.3 If} the dimension of the RS of $\hat{\mathbf{L}}_w$ does not increase in $T$ consecutive iterations, set $k = 0$ to stop the algorithm.
\\
\textbf{2. End While} \\
\textbf{Output:} The matrices $\mathbf{D}_w$ and $\hat{\mathbf{L}}_w$ can be used for column sampling in the first step of the Algorithm presented in Section \ref{sec:alg_eff_sampling}.
}
\end{algorithm}
\begin{figure}[t!]
\includegraphics[width=0.42\textwidth]{Untitled}
\centering
\vspace{-0.05in}
\caption{ Visualization of Algorithm 3. We run few cycles of the algorithm and stop when the rank of the LR component does not change over $T$ consecutive steps. One cycle of the algorithm starts from the point marked ``I'' and proceeds as follows. \textbf{I}: Matrix $\mathbf{D}_w$ is decomposed and $\hat{\mathbf{L}}_w$ is the obtained LR component of $\mathbf{D}_w$. \textbf{II}: Algorithm 2 is applied to $\hat{\mathbf{L}}_w$ to select the informative columns of $\hat{\mathbf{L}}_w$. $\hat{\mathbf{L}}_w^s$ is the matrix of columns selected from $\hat{\mathbf{L}}_w$. \textbf{III}: Matrix $\mathbf{D}_c$ is formed from the columns of $\mathbf{D}$ that correspond to the columns of $\hat{\mathbf{L}}_w^s$. \textbf{1}: Matrix $\mathbf{D}_c$ is decomposed and $\hat{\mathbf{L}}_c$ is the obtained LR component of $\mathbf{D}_c$. \textbf{2}: Algorithm 2 is applied to $\hat{\mathbf{L}}_c^T$ to select the informative rows of $\hat{\mathbf{L}}_c$. $\hat{\mathbf{L}}_c^s$ is the matrix of rows selected from $\hat{\mathbf{L}}_c$. \textbf{3}: Matrix $\mathbf{D}_w$ is formed as the rows of $\mathbf{D}$ corresponding to the rows used to form $\hat{\mathbf{L}}_c^s$. }
\label{alg3}
\end{figure}
Algorithm 3 was found to converge in a very small number of iterations (typically less than 4 iterations). Thus, even when Algorithm 3 is used
to form the matrix $\mathbf{D}_w$, the order of complexity of the proposed decomposition method with efficient
column/row sampling (presented in Section \ref{sec:alg_eff_sampling}) is roughly $\mathcal{O}(\max(N_1,N_2) r^2)$.
\subsection{Online Implementation}
\label{sec:online}
The proposed decomposition approach consists of two main steps, namely, learning the CS of the LR component then decomposing the columns independently. This structure lends itself to online implementation, which could be very beneficial in settings where the data arrives on the fly. The idea is to first learn the CS of the LR component from a small batch of the data and keep tracking the CS. Since the CS is being tracked, any new data column can be decomposed based on the updated subspace. The table of Algorithm 4 details the proposed online matrix decomposition algorithm, where $\mathbf{d}_t$ denotes the $t^{\text{th}}$ received data column.
Algorithm 4 uses a parameter $n_u$ which determines the rate at which the algorithm updates the CS of the LR component. For instance, if $n_u = 20$, then the CS is updated every 20 new data columns (step 2.2 of Algorithm 4). The parameter $n_u$ has to be set in accordance with the rate of the change of the subspace of the LR component; a small value for $n_u$ is used if the subspace is changing rapidly. The parameter $n_s$ determines the number of columns last received that are used to update the CS. If the subspace changes rapidly, the older columns may be less relevant to the current subspace, hence a small value for $n_s$ is used. On the other hand, when the data is noisy and the subspace changes at a slower rate, choosing a larger value for $n_s$ can lead to more accurate estimation of the CS.
\begin{algorithm}
\caption{Online Implementation}
{\footnotesize
\textbf{1. Initialization} \\
\textbf{1.1} Set the parameters $n_u$ and $n_s$ equal to integers greater than or equal to one.
\\
\textbf{1.2} Form $\mathbf{D}_0 \in \mathbb{R}^{N_1 \times (C_r \hat{r})}$ as $$\mathbf{D}_0 = [\mathbf{d}_1 \: \mathbf{d}_2 \: ... \: \mathbf{d}_{C_r \hat{r}}].$$ Decompose $\mathbf{D}_0$ using (2) and obtain the CS of its LR component. Define ${\mathbf{U}}_o$ as the learned CS, ${\mathbf{Q}}_o$ the appropriate representation matrix and $\hat{\mathbf{S}}$ the obtained sparse component of $\mathbf{D}_0$.
\\
\textbf{1.3} Apply Algorithm 2 to ${\mathbf{U}}_o^T$ to construct the row sampling matrix $\mathbf{S}_2$.
\\
\\
\textbf{2. For} any new data column $\mathbf{d}_t$ do\\
\textbf{2.1} Decompose $\mathbf{d}_t$ as
\begin{eqnarray}
\underset{\hat{\mathbf{q}}_t}{\min} \| \mathbf{S}_2^T \mathbf{d}_{t} - \mathbf{S}_2^T \mathbf{U}_o \hat{\mathbf{q}}_t \|_1 \: ,
\label{eq_q_find}
\end{eqnarray}
and update \\
$\mathbf{Q}_o \gets [\mathbf{Q}_o \: \: \mathbf{q}_t^{*}]$, $\hat{\mathbf{S}} \gets [\hat{\mathbf{S}} \: \: (\mathbf{d}_t - \mathbf{U}_o \mathbf{q}_t^{*})]$, where $\mathbf{q}_t^{*}$ is the optimal point of (\ref{eq_q_find}). \\
\textbf{2.2 If} the remainder of $\frac{t}{n_u}$ is equal to zero, update $\mathbf{U}_o$ as
\begin{eqnarray}
\underset{\hat{U}_o}{\min} \| \mathbf{D}_t - \hat{\mathbf{U}}_o \mathbf{Q}_o^t \|_1 \: ,
\label{eq_online_up}
\end{eqnarray}
where $\mathbf{Q}_o^t$ is the last $n_s \hat{r}$ columns of $\mathbf{Q}_o$
and $\mathbf{D}_t$ is the matrix formed from the last $n_s \hat{r}$ received data columns. Apply Algorithm 2 to the new $\mathbf{U}_o^T$ to update the row sampling matrix $\mathbf{S}_2$.\\
\textbf{2. End For}\\
\textbf{ Output} The matrix $\hat{\mathbf{S}}$ as the obtained sparse matrix, $\hat{\mathbf{L}} = \mathbf{D} - \hat{\mathbf{S}}$ as the obtained LR matrix and $\mathbf{U}_o$ as the current basis for the CS of the LR component.
}
\end{algorithm}
\subsection{Noisy Data}
In practice, noisy data can be modeled as
\begin{eqnarray}
\mathbf{D} = \mathbf{L} + \mathbf{S} + \mathbf{N} \:,
\end{eqnarray}
where $\mathbf{N}$ is an additive noise component.
In \cite{lamport22}, it was shown that the program
\begin{eqnarray}
\begin{aligned}
& \underset{\hat{\mathbf{L}},\hat{\mathbf{S}}}{\min}
& & \lambda\|\hat{\mathbf{S}}\|_1 + \|\hat{\mathbf{L}} \|_* \\
& \text{subject to}
& & \big\| \hat{\mathbf{L}} + \hat{\mathbf{S}} - \mathbf{D} \big\|_F \leq \epsilon_n \:, \\
\end{aligned}
\label{eq2noisy}
\end{eqnarray}
can recover the LR and sparse components with an error bound that is proportional to the noise level. The parameter $\epsilon_n$ has to be chosen based on the noise level. This modified version can be used in the proposed algorithms to account for the noise. Similarly, to account for the noise in the representation learning problem (\ref{eq23}), the $\ell_1$-norm minimization problem can be modified as follows:
\begin{eqnarray}
\underset{\hat{\mathbf{Q}} , \hat{\mathbf{E}}}{\min} \| \mathbf{S}_2^T \mathbf{D}- \mathbf{S}_2^T \mathbf{U} \hat{\mathbf{Q}} - \hat{\mathbf{E}} \|_1 \quad \text{subject to} \quad \| \hat{\mathbf{E}} \|_F \leq \delta_n.
\end{eqnarray}
$\hat{\mathbf{E}} \in \mathbb{R}^{m_2 \times N_2}$ is used to cancel out the effect of the noise and the parameter $\delta_n$ is chosen based on the noise level \cite{candesstab}.
\section{Numerical Simulations}
\label{sec:sim}
In this section, we present some numerical simulations to study the performance of the proposed randomized decomposition method. First, we present a set of simulations confirming our analysis which established that the sufficient number of sampled columns/rows is linear in $r$. Then, we compare the proposed approach to the state-of-the-art randomized algorithm \cite {new1} and demonstrate that the proposed sampling strategy can lead to notable improvement in performance. We then provide an illustrative example to showcase the effectiveness of our approach on real video frames for background subtraction and activity detection.
Given the structure of the proposed approach, it is shown that side information can be leveraged to further simplify the decomposition task. In addition, a numerical example is provided to examine the performance of Algorithm 3. Finally, we investigate the performance of the online algorithm and show that the proposed online method can successfully track the underlying subspace.
In all simulations, the Augmented Lagrange multiplier (ALM) algorithm \cite{lamport23,lamport2} is used to solve the optimization problem (\ref{eq2}). In addition, the $\ell_1$-magic routine \cite{lamport57} is used to solve the $\ell_1$-norm minimization problems. It is important to note that in all the provided simulations (except in Section \ref{sec:alternating_alg}), the convex program (\ref{eq2}) that operates on the entire data can yield correct decomposition with respect to the considered criteria. Thus, if the randomized methods cannot yield correct decomposition, it is because they fall short of acquiring the essential information through sampling.
\subsection{Phase transition plots}
In this section, we investigate the required number of randomly sampled columns/rows.
The LR matrix is generated as a product $\mathbf{L}= \mathbf{U}_r \mathbf{Q}_r$, where $\mathbf{U}_r \in \mathbb{R}^{N_1 \times r}$ and $\mathbf{Q}_r \in \mathbb{R}^{r \times N_2}$. The elements of $\mathbf{U}_r$ and $\mathbf{Q}_r$ are sampled independently from a standard normal $\mathcal{N}(0,1)$ distribution. The sparse matrix $\mathbf{S}$ follows the Bernoulli model with $\rho = 0.02$. In this experiment, Algorithm 1 is used and the column/rows are sampled uniformly at random.
Fig. \ref{fig:trans_plots} shows the phase transition plots for different numbers of randomly sampled rows/columns. In this simulation, the data is a $1000\times1000$ matrix. For each $(m_1 , m_2)$, we generate 10 random realizations. A trial is considered successful if the recovered LR matrix $\hat{\mathbf{L}}$ satisfies $\frac{\| \mathbf{L} - \hat{\mathbf{L}} \|_F}{\| \mathbf{L} \|_F} \leq 5 \times 10^{-3}$. It is clear that the required number of sampled columns/rows increases as the rank or the sparsity parameter $\rho$ are increased. When the sparsity parameter is increased to 0.3, the proposed algorithm can hardly yield correct decomposition. Actually, in this case the matrix $\mathbf{S}$ is no longer a sparse matrix.
The top row of Fig. \ref{fig:trans_plots} confirms that the sufficient values for $m_1$ and $m_2$ are roughly linear in $r$. For instance, when the rank is increased from 5 to 25, the required value for $m_1$ increases from 30 to 140. In this experiment, the column and RS of $\mathbf{L}$ are sampled from the random orthogonal model. Thus, the CS and RS have small coherency whp \cite{lamport4}. Therefore, the important factor governing the sample complexity is the rank of $\mathbf{L}$. Indeed, Fig. \ref{fig:data_dim} shows the phase transition for different sizes of the data matrix when the rank of $\mathbf{L}$ is fixed. One can see that the required values for $m_1$ and $m_2$ are almost independent of the size of the data confirming our analysis.
\begin{figure}[t!]
\includegraphics[width=0.50\textwidth]{cv3}
\centering
\vspace{-0.3in}
\caption{Phase transition plots for various rank and sparsity levels. White designates successful decomposition and black designates incorrect decomposition.}
\label{fig:trans_plots}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure}[t!]
\includegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth]{c4}
\centering
\vspace{-0.2in}
\caption{Phase transition plots for various data matrix dimensions.}
\label{fig:data_dim}
\end{figure}
\subsection{Efficient column/row sampling}
In this experiment, the algorithm presented in Section \ref{sec:alg_eff_sampling} is compared to the randomized decomposition algorithm in \cite{new1}. It is shown that the proposed sampling strategy can effectively reduce the required number of sampled columns/rows, and makes the proposed method remarkably robust to structured data. In this experiment, $\mathbf{D}$ is a $2000\times4200$ matrix. The LR component is generated as $$\mathbf{L} = [ \mathbf{G}_1 \: \mathbf{G}_2 \: ... \: \mathbf{G}_n ] \: . $$
For $1 \leq i \leq \frac{n}{2}$, $$\mathbf{G}_i = \mathbf{U}_i \mathbf{Q}_i\: ,$$
where $\mathbf{U}_i \in \mathbb{R}^{2000 \times \frac{r}{n}}$, $\mathbf{Q}_i \in \mathbb{R}^{\frac{r}{n} \times \frac{130 r}{n}}$ and the elements of $\mathbf{U}_i$ and $\mathbf{Q}_i$ are sampled independently from a normal distribution $\mathcal{N}(0 , 1)$. For $n/2+1 \leq i \leq n$, $$\mathbf{G}_i = 13 \mathbf{U}_i \mathbf{Q}_i\: ,$$
where $\mathbf{U}_i \in \mathbb{R}^{2000 \times \frac{r}{n}}$, $\mathbf{Q}_i \in \mathbb{R}^{\frac{r}{n} \times \frac{10 r}{n}}$, and the elements of $\mathbf{U}_i$ and $\mathbf{Q}_i$ are sampled independently from an $\mathcal{N}(0 , 1)$ distribution. We set $r$ equal to 60; thus, the rank of $\mathbf{L}$ is equal to 60 whp. The sparse matrix $\mathbf{S}$ follows the Bernoulli model and each element of $\mathbf{S}$ is non-zero with probability 0.02. In this simulation, we do not use Algorithm 3 to form $\mathbf{D}_w$. The matrix $\mathbf{D}_w$ is formed from 300 uniformly sampled \emph{rows} of $\mathbf{D}$.
We evaluate the performance of the algorithm for different values of $n$, i.e., different number of clusters. Fig. \ref{fig:comp} shows the performance of the proposed approach and the approach in \cite{new1} for different values of $m_1$ and $m_2$. For each value of $m_1 = m_2$, we compute the error in LR matrix recovery
$\frac{\| \mathbf{L} - \hat{\mathbf{L}} \|_F}{\| \mathbf{L} \|_F} $ averaged over 10 independent runs,
and conclude that the algorithm can yield correct decomposition if the average error is less than 0.01. In Fig. \ref{fig:comp}, the values 0, 1 designate incorrect and correct decomposition, respectively. It can be seen that the presented approach requires a significantly smaller number of samples to yield the correct decomposition. This is due to the fact that the randomized algorithm \cite{new1} samples both the columns and rows uniformly at random and independently. In sharp contrast, we use $\hat{\mathbf{L}}_w$ to find the most informative columns to form $\mathbf{D}_{s1}$, and also leverage the information embedded in the CS to find the informative rows to from $\mathbf{D}_{s2}$. One can see that when $n = 60$, \cite{new1} cannot yield correct decomposition even when $m_1 = m_2 = 1800$.
\begin{figure}[t!]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth]{new4}
\vspace{-.1in}
\caption{Performance of the proposed approach and the randomized algorithm in \cite{new1}. A value 1 indicates correct decomposition and a value 0 indicates incorrect decomposition.}
\label{fig:comp}
\end{figure}
\subsection{Vector decomposition for background subtraction}
The LR plus sparse matrix decomposition can be effectively used to detect a moving object in a stationary background \cite{lamport2,bouwmans2015decomposition}. The background is modeled as a LR matrix and the moving object as a sparse matrix. Since videos are typically high dimensional objects, standard algorithms can be quite slow for such applications. Our algorithm is a good candidate for such a problem as it reduces the dimensionality significantly. The decomposition problem can be further simplified by leveraging prior information about the stationary background. In particular, we know that the background does not change or we can construct it with some pre-known dictionary. For example, consider the video from \cite{lamport61}, which was also used in \cite{lamport2}. Few frames of the stationary background are illustrated in Fig. \ref{fig:bkgnd}.
\begin{figure}[t!]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.4\textwidth]{fig3}
\vspace{-.1in}
\caption{Stationary background.}
\label{fig:bkgnd}
\end{figure}
Thus, we can simply form the CS of the LR matrix using these frames which can describe the stationary background in different states. Accordingly, we just need to learn the representation matrix. As such, the background subtraction problem is simplified to a vector decomposition problem.
\begin{figure}[t!]
\includegraphics[width=0.4\textwidth]{cv}
\centering
\vspace{-0.15in}
\caption{Two frames of a video taken in a lobby. The first column displays the original frames. The second and third columns display the LR and sparse components recovered using the proposed approach.
}
\label{fig:decomp}
\end{figure}
Fig. \ref{fig:decomp} shows that the proposed method successfully separates the background and the moving objects.
In this experiment, 500 randomly sampled rows are used (i.e., 500 randomly sampled pixels) for the representation matrix learning (\ref{eq23}). While the running time of our approach is just few milliseconds, it takes almost half an hour if we use (\ref{eq2}) to decompose the video file \cite{lamport2}.
\subsection{Alternating algorithm for column sampling}
\label{sec:alternating_alg}
In this section, we investigate the performance of Algorithm 3 for column sampling. The rank of the selected columns is shown to converge to the rank of $\mathbf{L}$ even when both the rows and columns of $\mathbf{L}$ exhibit a highly structured distribution.
To generate the LR matrix $\mathbf{L}$ we first generate a matrix $\mathbf{G}$ as in Section \ref{sec:non_uniform} but setting $r = 100$. Then, we construct the matrix $\mathbf{U}_g$ from the first $r$ right singular vectors of $\mathbf{G}$. We then generate $\mathbf{G}$ in a similar way and set $\mathbf{V}_g$ equal to the first $r$ right singular vectors of $\mathbf{G}$. Let the matrix $\mathbf{L} = \mathbf{U}_g \mathbf{V}_g^T$. For example, for $n=100$, $\mathbf{L} \in \mathbb{R}^{10250 \times 10250}$. Note that the resulting LR matrix is nearly sparse since in this simulation we consider a very challenging scenario in which both the columns and rows of $\mathbf{L}$ are highly structured and coherent. Thus, in this simulation we set the sparse matrix equal to zero and use Algorithm 3 as follows. The matrix $\mathbf{D}_c$ is formed using 300 columns sampled uniformly at random and the following steps are performed iteratively:\\
1. Apply Algorithm 2 to $\mathbf{D}_c^T$ with $C=3$ to sample approximately $3 r$ columns of $\mathbf{D}_c^T$ and form $\mathbf{D}_w$ from the rows of $\mathbf{D}$ corresponding to the selected rows of $\mathbf{D}_c$.\\
2. Apply Algorithm 2 to $\mathbf{D}_w$ with $C=3$ to sample approximately $3 r$ columns of $\mathbf{D}_w$ and form $\mathbf{D}_c$ from the columns of $\mathbf{D}$ corresponding to the selected columns of $\mathbf{D}_c$. Fig. \ref{fig:iteration} shows the rank of $\mathbf{D}_c$ after each iteration. It is evident that the algorithm converges to the rank of $\mathbf{L}$ in less than 3 iterations even for $n = 100$ clusters. For all values of $n$, i.e., $n\in\{2, 50, 60\}$, the data is a $10250\times10250$ matrix.
\begin{figure}[t!]
\includegraphics[width=0.31\textwidth]{iteration}
\centering
\vspace{-0.1in}
\caption{The rank of the matrix of sampled columns.}
\label{fig:iteration}
\end{figure}
\subsection{Online Implementation}
In this section, the proposed online method is examined. It is shown that the proposed scalable online algorithm tracks the underlying subspace successfully. The matrix $\mathbf{S}$ follows the Bernoulli model with $\rho = 0.01$. Assume that the orthonormal matrix $\mathbf{U} \in \mathbb{R}^{N_1 \times r}$ spans a random $r$-dimensional subspace. The matrix $\mathbf{L}$ is generated as follows.
\smallbreak
\noindent\textbf{For} $k$ from 1 to $N_2$\\
\indent\textbf{1.} Generate $\mathbf{E} \in \mathbb{R}^{N_1 \times r}$ and $\mathbf{q} \in \mathbb{R}^{r \times 1}$ randomly. \\
\indent\textbf{2.} $\mathbf{L} = [\mathbf{L} \: \: \mathbf{U} \mathbf{q}] $ . \\
\indent\textbf{3.} \textbf{If} (mod$(k , n)$ = 0) \\
\indent\indent \quad $ \mathbf{U} = \text{approx-r} ( \mathbf{U} + \alpha \mathbf{E}).$ \\
\indent\indent\textbf{End If} \\
\textbf{End For}
\smallbreak
The elements of $\mathbf{q}_i $ and $\mathbf{E}$ are sampled from standard normal distributions. The output of the function approx-r is the matrix of the first $r$ left singular vectors of the input matrix and mod$(k , n)$ is the remainder of $k / n$. The parameters $\alpha$ and $n$ control the rate of change of the underlying subspace. The subspace changes at a higher rate if $\alpha$ is increased or $n$ is decreased. In this simulation, $n = 10$, i.e., the CS is randomly rotated every 10 new data columns. In this simulation, the parameter $r = 5$ and $N_1 = 400$. We compare the performance of the proposed online approach to the online algorithm in \cite{citonline}. For our proposed method, we set $C=20$ when Algorithm 2 is applied to $\mathbf{U}$,
i.e., $20 r$ rows of $\mathbf{U}$ are sampled. The method presented in \cite{citonline} is initialized with the exact CS and its tuning parameter is set equal to $1/\sqrt{N_1}$. The algorithm \cite{citonline} updates the CS with every new data column. The parameter $n_u$ of the proposed online method is set equal to 4 (i.e., the CS is updated every 4 new data columns) and the parameter $n_s$ is set equal to $5 r$. Define $\hat{\mathbf{L}}$ as the recovered LR matrix. Fig. \ref{fig: online} shows the $\ell_2$-norm of the columns of $\mathbf{L} - \hat{\mathbf{L}}$ normalized by the average $\ell_2$-norm of the columns of $\mathbf{L}$ for different values of $\alpha$. One can see that the proposed method can successfully track the CS while it is continuously changing. The online method \cite{citonline} performs well when the subspace is not changing ($\alpha = 0$), however, it fails to track the subspace when it is changing
\begin{figure}[t!]
\includegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth]{online_fig}
\centering
\vspace{-.1in}
\caption{Performance of the proposed online approach and the online algorithm in \cite{citonline}. }
\label{fig: online}
\end{figure}
\section*{Appendix}
\noindent\textbf{Proof of Lemma \ref{lm3}} \\
The selected columns of $\mathbf{L}$ can be written as $\mathbf{L}_{s1}=\mathbf{L} \mathbf{S}_1$.
Using the compact SVD of $\mathbf{L}$, $\mathbf{L}_{s1}$ can be rewritten as
$\mathbf{L}_{s1}=\mathbf{U} \boldsymbol{\Sigma} \mathbf{V}^T \mathbf{S}_1$.
Therefore, to show that the CS of $\mathbf{L}_{s1}$ is equal to that of $\mathbf{L}$, it suffices to show that the matrix $\mathbf{V}^T \mathbf{S}_1$ is a full rank matrix. The matrix $\mathbf{S}_1$ selects $m_1$ rows of $\mathbf{V}$ uniformly at random. Therefore, using Theorem 2 in \cite{lamport3}, if
\begin{eqnarray}
m_1 \ge r\gamma^2(\mathbf{V}) \max \left( c_2 \log r , c_3 \log \frac{3}{\delta} \right),
\label{eq42}
\end{eqnarray}
then the matrix $\mathbf{V}^T \mathbf{S}_1$ satisfies the inequality
\begin{eqnarray}
\| I - \frac{N_2}{m_1} \mathbf{V}^T \mathbf{S}_1 \mathbf{S}_1^T \mathbf{V} \|\leq \frac{1}{2}
\label{eq43}
\end{eqnarray}
with probability at least $(1-\delta)$, where $c_2, c_3$ are numerical constants \cite{lamport3}. Accordingly, if $\sigma_1$ and $\sigma_r$ denote the largest and smallest singular values of $\mathbf{S}_1^T \mathbf{V}$, respectively, then
\begin{eqnarray}
\frac{m_1}{2 N_2} \leq \sigma_1^2 \leq \sigma_r^2 \leq \frac{3 m_1}{2 N_2}
\label{eq44}
\end{eqnarray}
Therefore, the singular values of the matrix $\mathbf{V}^T \mathbf{S}_1$ are greater than $\sqrt{\frac{m_1}{2 N_2}}$. Accordingly, the matrix $\mathbf{V}^T \mathbf{S}_1$ is a full rank matrix.
\begin{remark}
A direct application of Theorem 2 in \cite{lamport3} would in fact lead to the sufficient condition
\begin{eqnarray}
m_1 \ge r\gamma^2(\mathbf{R}) \max \left( c_2 \log r , c_3 \log \frac{3}{\delta} \right),
\label{neweq42}
\end{eqnarray}
where $\mathbf{R} \in \mathbb{R}^{N_2 \times N_2}$ denotes the matrix of right singular vectors of $\mathbf{L}$. The bound in (\ref{eq42}) is slightly tighter since it uses the incoherence parameter $\gamma(\mathbf{V})\leq \gamma(\mathbf{R}) \triangleq \sqrt{N_2} \max_{i,j} |\mathbf{R}(i,j)|$ in (\ref{neweq42}), where $\mathbf{V}$ consists of the first $r$ columns of $\mathbf{R}$. This follows easily by replacing the incoherence parameter in the step that bounds the $\ell_2$-norm of the row vectors of the submatrix in the proof of (\cite{lamport3}, Theorem 2).
\end{remark}
\noindent\textbf{Proof of lemma \ref{lm4}}\\
The sampled columns are written as
\begin{eqnarray}
\mathbf{D}_{s1}=\mathbf{D} \mathbf{S}_1= \mathbf{L}_{s1} + \mathbf{S}_{s1}.
\label{eq45}
\end{eqnarray}
First, we investigate the coherency of the new LR matrix $\mathbf{L}_{s1}$. Define $\textbf{P}_{\mathbf{S}_1^T \mathbf{V}}$ as the projection matrix onto the CS of $\mathbf{S}_1^T \mathbf{V}$ which is equal to the rows subspace of $\mathbf{L}_{s1}$. Therefore, the projection of the standard basis onto the rows subspace of $\mathbf{L}_{s1}$ can be written as
\begin{eqnarray}
\begin{aligned}
&\underset{i}{\max} \| \textbf{P}_{\mathbf{S}_1^T \mathbf{V}} \mathbf{e}_i \|_2^2 = \underset{i}{\max} \| \mathbf{S}_1^T \mathbf{V} (\mathbf{V}^T \mathbf{S}_1 \mathbf{S}_1^T \mathbf{V})^{-1} \mathbf{V}^T \mathbf{S}_1 \mathbf{e}_i \|_2^2 \\
& \leq \underset{j}{\max} \| \mathbf{S}_1^T \mathbf{V} (\mathbf{V}^T \mathbf{S}_1 \mathbf{S}_1^T \mathbf{V})^{-1} \mathbf{V}^T \mathbf{e}_j \|_2^2\\
&\leq \| \mathbf{S}_1^T \mathbf{V} (\mathbf{V}^T \mathbf{S}_1 \mathbf{S}_1^T \mathbf{V})^{-1} \|^2 \| \mathbf{V}^T \mathbf{e}_j \|_2^2 \\
& \leq \frac{\gamma^2 (\mathbf{V}) r}{N_2} (\frac{\sigma_1^2}{\sigma_r^4})= \frac{\gamma^2 (\mathbf{V}) r}{N_2} \frac{6 N_2}{m_1}=\frac{(6\gamma^2 (\mathbf{V}))r}{m_1}
\end{aligned}
\label{eq46}
\end{eqnarray}
where $ (\mathbf{S}_1^T \mathbf{V} (\mathbf{V}^T \mathbf{S}_1 \mathbf{S}_1^T \mathbf{V})^{-1} \mathbf{V}^T \mathbf{S}_1)$ is the projection matrix onto the CS of $\mathbf{S}_1^T \mathbf{V}$. The first inequality follows from the fact that $\{ \mathbf{S}_1 \mathbf{e}_i \}_{i=1}^{m_1}$ is a subset of $\{ \mathbf{e}_j \}_{j=1}^{N_2}$. The second inequality follows from Cauchy-Schwarz inequality and the third inequality follows from (\ref{eq10}) and (\ref{eq44}).
Using lemma 2.2 of \cite{lamport4}, there exists numerical constants $c_7$, $c_8$ such that
\begin{eqnarray}
\underset{i}{\max} \| \mathbf{U}^T e_i \|_2^2 \leq \frac{\mu_p r}{N_1}
\label{eq47}
\end{eqnarray}
with probability at least $1-c_8 N_1^{-3}$ and $\mu_p = \frac{c_7 \max (r,\log N_1)}{r}$.\\
In addition, we need to find a bound similar to the third condition of (\ref{eq9}) for the LR matrix $\mathbf{L}_{s1}$. Let $\mathbf{L}_{s1} = \mathbf{U}_{s1} \boldsymbol{\Sigma}_{s1} \mathbf{V}_{s1}^T$ be the SVD decomposition of $\mathbf{L}_{s1}$. Define
\begin{eqnarray}
\mathbf{H}= \mathbf{U}_{s1} \mathbf{V}_{s1}^T = \sum_{i=1}^r \mathbf{U}_{s1}^i (\mathbf{V}_{s1}^i)^T
\label{eq48}
\end{eqnarray}
where $\mathbf{U}_{s1}^i$ is the $i^{\text{th}}$ column of $\mathbf{U}_{s1}$ and $\mathbf{V}_{s1}^i$ is the $i^{\text{th}}$ column of $\mathbf{V}_{s1}$.
Given the random orthogonal model of the CS, $\mathbf{H}$ has the same distribution as
\begin{eqnarray}
\mathbf{H}^{'} = \sum_{i=1}^r \epsilon_i \mathbf{U}_{s1}^i (\mathbf{V}_{s1}^i)^T
\label{eq49}
\end{eqnarray}
where $\{ \epsilon_i \}$ is an independent Rademacher sequence. Using Hoeffding's inequality \cite{lamport43}, conditioned on $\mathbf{U}_{s1}$ and $\mathbf{V}_{s1}$ we have
\begin{eqnarray}
\begin{aligned}
& \mathbb{P} \left( |\mathbf{H}^{'} (i,j)| > t \right) \leq 2 e^{\frac{- t^2}{2 h_{ij}^2}} , \\
& h_{ij}^2=\sum_{k=1}^r (\mathbf{U}_{s1} (i , k))^2 (\mathbf{V}_{s1} (j , k))^2
\label{eq50}
\end{aligned}
\end{eqnarray}
Consider the following lemma adapted from Lemma 2.2 of \cite{lamport4}.
\begin{lemma}[\text{Adapted from lemma 2.2 of \cite{lamport4}}]
If the orthonormal matrix $\mathbf{U}$ follows the random orthogonal model, then
\begin{eqnarray}
\mathbb{P} \left( |\mathbf{U} (i,j)|^2 \ge 20\frac{\log N_1}{N_1} \right) \leq 3 N_1^{-8} .
\label{eq31}
\end{eqnarray}
\label{lm5}
\end{lemma}
Therefore,
\begin{eqnarray}
|\mathbf{U}_{s1} (i , k)|^2 \leq 20 \frac{ \log N_1}{N_1}
\label{eq51}
\end{eqnarray}
with probability at least $1-3 N_1^{-8}$. Therefore, we can bound $h_{ij}^2$ as
\begin{eqnarray}
h_{ij}^2 \leq 20\frac{\log N_1}{N_1} \| \mathbf{V}_{s1} e_i \|_2^2
\label{eq52}
\end{eqnarray}
Using (\ref{eq46}), (\ref{eq52}) can be rewritten as
\begin{eqnarray}
h_{ij}^2 \leq 120\frac{\log N_1 \gamma^2 (\mathbf{V}) r}{N_1 m_1}
\label{eq53}
\end{eqnarray}
Choose $t = \omega \frac{\gamma (\mathbf{V}) \sqrt{r}}{\sqrt{N_1 m_1}}$ for some constant $\omega$. Thus, the unconditional form of (\ref{eq50}) can be written as
\begin{eqnarray}
\begin{aligned}
&\mathbb{P} \left( |\mathbf{H}^{'} (i,j)| > \omega \frac{\gamma (\mathbf{V}) \sqrt{r}}{\sqrt{N_1 m_1} } \right) \leq 2 e^{\frac{- \zeta \omega^2}{\log N_1}} +\\
& \mathbb{P} \left( h_{ij}^2 \ge 120\frac{\log N_1 \gamma^2 (\mathbf{V}) r}{N_1 m_1} \right)
\end{aligned}
\label{eq54}
\end{eqnarray}
for some numerical constant $\zeta$. Setting $\omega=\zeta^{'} \log N_1$ where $\zeta^{'}$ is a sufficiently large numerical constant gives
\begin{eqnarray}
\mathbb{P} \left( \| \mathbf{H}^{'} \|_{\infty} \ge c_9 \log N_1 \frac{\gamma (\mathbf{V}) \sqrt{r}}{\sqrt{N_1 m_1}} \right) \leq 3 r N_1^{-7}
\label{eq55}
\end{eqnarray}
for come constant number $c_9$ since (\ref{eq51}) should be satisfied for $r N_1$ random variables. \par
Therefore, according to lemma \ref{lm1}, if
\begin{eqnarray}
m_1 \ge {\frac{r}{\rho}_r} \mu^{'} (\log N_1)^2
\label{eq56}
\end{eqnarray}
\begin{eqnarray}
\rho \leq \rho_s
\label{eq57}
\end{eqnarray}
then, the convex algorithm (\ref{eq20}) yields the exact decomposition with probability at least $1-c_8 N_1^{-3}$ where
\begin{eqnarray}
\mu^{'} = \max \left( \mu_p , 6\gamma^2 (\mathbf{V}) , (\gamma (\mathbf{V}) c_9 \log N_1)^2 \right) .
\label{eq58}
\end{eqnarray}
\\
\textbf{Proof of lemma \ref{lm8}}\\
Based on (\ref{eq1}), the matrix of sampled rows can be written as
\begin{eqnarray}
\begin{aligned}
\mathbf{D}_{s2}=\mathbf{S}_2^T \mathbf{D}=\mathbf{S}_2^T \mathbf{L} + \mathbf{S}_2^T \mathbf{S}
=\mathbf{L}_{s2} + \mathbf{S}_{s2}
\end{aligned}
\label{eq62}
\end{eqnarray}
Let $\mathbf{L}_{s2}=\mathbf{U}_{s2} \boldsymbol{\Sigma}_{s2} \mathbf{V}_{s2}^T$ be the compact SVD decomposition of $\mathbf{L}_{s2}$ and $\mathbf{L}_{s2}=\mathbf{U}_{s2}^c \boldsymbol{\Sigma}_{s2}^c (\mathbf{V}_{s2}^c)^T$ its complete SVD. It can be shown \cite{lamport17} that (\ref{secondrows}) is equivalent to
\begin{eqnarray}
\begin{aligned}
& \underset{\hat{\textbf{z}}_{i}}{\min}
& & \| \hat{\textbf{z}}_{i} \|_1 \\
& \text{subject to}
& & (\mathbf{U}_{s2}^{\perp})^T \hat{\textbf{z}}_{i}= (\mathbf{U}_{s2}^{\perp})^T \mathbf{S}_{s2}^i \:.
\end{aligned}
\label{eq63}
\end{eqnarray}
where $\mathbf{S}_{s2}^i$ is the $i^{th}$ column of $\mathbf{S}_{s2}$ and $\mathbf{U}_{s2}^{\perp}$ is the last $(m_2-r)$ columns of $\mathbf{U}_{s2}^c$ which are orthogonal to $\mathbf{U}_{s2}$. In other words, if $\mathbf{q}_i^{*}$ is the optimal point of (\ref{secondrows}) and $\mathbf{z}_i^{*} \in \mathbb{R}^{m_2}$ is the optimal point of (\ref{eq63}), then $\mathbf{z}_i^{*} = \mathbf{S}_2^T (\mathbf{d}_i - \mathbf{U} \mathbf{q}_i^{*})$. Thus, it is enough to show that the optimal point of (\ref{eq63}) is equal to $\mathbf{S}_{s2}^i$.
The columns subspace of $\mathbf{U}_{s2}$ obeys the random orthogonal model. Thus, $\mathbf{U}_{s2}^{\perp}$ can be modeled as a random subset of $\mathbf{U}_{s2}^c$. Based on the result in \cite{lamport3}, if we assume that the sign of the non-zero elements of $\mathbf{S}_{s2}^i$ are uniformly random, then the optimal point of (\ref{eq63}) is $\mathbf{S}_{s2}^i$ with probability at least $(1-\delta)$ provided that
\begin{eqnarray}
m_2 -r \ge \max \left( c_4 \| \mathbf{S}_{s2}^i \|_0 \gamma^2 (\mathbf{U}_{s2}^c) \log \frac{m_2}{\delta} , c_5 \left( \log \frac{m_2}{\delta} \right)^2 \right)
\label{eq64}
\end{eqnarray}
for some fixed numerical constants $c_4$ and $c_5$. The parameter $\gamma (\mathbf{U}_{s2}^c) = \sqrt{m_2} \underset{i,j}{\max} |\mathbf{U}_{s2}^c (i,j)|$ and $\| \mathbf{S}_{s2}^i \|_0$ is the $l_0$-norm of $\mathbf{S}_{s2}^i$.
In this paper, we do not assume that the sign of the non-zero elements of the sparse matrix $\mathbf{S}$ is random. However, according to Theorem 2.3 of \cite{lamport2} (de-randomization technique) if the locations of the nonzero entries of $\mathbf{S}$ follow the Bernoulli model with parameter $2\rho$, and the signs of $\mathbf{S}$ are uniformly random and if (\ref{eq63}) yields the exact solution who, then it is also exact with at least the same probability for the model in which the signs are fixed and the locations follow the Bernoulli model with parameter $\rho$ \cite{lamport2}. Therefore, it suffices to provide the sufficient condition for the exact recovery of a random sign sparse vector with Bernoulli parameter $2\rho$.\par
First, we provide sufficient conditions to guarantee that
\begin{eqnarray}
m_2 -r \ge c_4 \| \mathbf{S}_{s2}^i \|_0 \gamma^2 (\mathbf{U}_{s2}^c) \log \frac{m_2}{\delta}
\label{eq65}
\end{eqnarray}
with high probability. Using Lemma \ref{lm5} and the union bound,
\begin{eqnarray}
\underset{i,j}{\max} |\mathbf{U}_{s2}^c (i,j)|^2 \leq 20 \frac{\log m_2}{m_2}
\label{eq66}
\end{eqnarray}
with probability at least $1-3m_2^{-6}$.\\
Now, we find the sufficient number of randomly sampled rows, $ m_2$, to guarantee that (\ref{eq65}) is satisfied with high probability. It is obvious that $m_2 < N_1$. Define $\kappa = \frac{\log N_1}{r}$. Therefore, it is sufficient to show that
\begin{eqnarray}
\frac{m_2}{\|\mathbf{S}_{s2}^i \|_0} \ge r \left( c_6 \kappa \log \frac{N_1}{\delta} +1 \right)
\label{eq67}
\end{eqnarray}
whp, where $c_6=20 c_4 $. Suppose that
\begin{eqnarray}
\rho \leq \frac{1}{\beta r \left( c_6 \kappa \log \frac{N_1}{\delta} +1 \right)}
\label{eq68}
\end{eqnarray}
where $\beta$ is a real number greater than one. Define $\alpha= r \left( c_6 \kappa \log \frac{N_1}{\delta} +1 \right)$. According to (\ref{eq68}) and the Chernoff Bound for Binomial random variables \cite{mcdiarmid1998concentration}, we have
\begin{eqnarray}
\begin{aligned}
& \mathbb{P} \left( \|\mathbf{S}_{s2}^i \|_0 - \frac{m_2}{\beta \alpha} > a \right)
\leq \exp \left( \frac{- a^2}{2(\frac{m_2}{\alpha\beta} + \frac{a}{3})} \right) .
\end{aligned}
\label{eq1n}
\end{eqnarray}
If we set $a=\frac{m_2}{\alpha} \left( 1- \frac{1}{\beta} \right)$, then the inequality (\ref{eq67}) is satisfied. Therefore, (\ref{eq1n}) can be rewritten as
\begin{eqnarray}
\begin{aligned}
& \mathbb{P} \left( \|\mathbf{S}_{s2}^i \|_0 - \frac{m_2}{\beta \alpha} > \frac{m_2}{\alpha} \left( 1- \frac{1}{\beta} \right) \right) \\
& \leq 2 \exp \left( \frac{- m_2^2 (\beta -1)^2}{\alpha^2 \beta^2} \frac{3\alpha\beta}{2 m_2(\beta+2)} \right).
\end{aligned}
\label{eq2n}
\end{eqnarray}
Therefore, if
\begin{eqnarray}
m_2 \ge \frac{ 2 r \beta (\beta - 2) \log \left( \frac{1}{\delta} \right)}{3 (\beta - 1)^2} \left( c_6 \kappa \log \frac{N_1}{\delta} +1 \right) ,
\label{eq3n}
\end{eqnarray}
then the inequality (\ref{eq67}) is satisfied with probability at least $(1-\delta)$. Accordingly, if
\begin{eqnarray}
\begin{aligned}
&\rho \leq \frac{0.5}{r \beta \left( c_6 \kappa \log \frac{N_1}{\delta} +1 \right)} \\
&m_2 \ge \max \Bigg( \frac{ 2 r \beta (\beta - 2) \log \left( \frac{1}{\delta} \right)}{3 (\beta - 1)^2} \left( c_6 \kappa \log \frac{N_1}{\delta} +1 \right) , \\
& \quad \quad \quad \quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad\quad \sqrt[6]{\frac{3}{\delta}}, ~c_5 \left( \log \frac{N_1}{\delta} \right)^2 \Bigg)
\end{aligned}
\label{eq75}
\end{eqnarray}
then (\ref{eq63}) returns the exact sparse vector with probability at least $1-3 \delta$. The factor 0.5 in the numerator of the right hand side of the first inequality of (\ref{eq75}) is due to the de-randomization technique \cite{lamport2} to provide the guarantee for the fixed sign case.
\smallbreak
\noindent\textbf{Proof of Theorem \ref{thm:main_result}} \\
The proposed decomposition algorithm yields the exact decomposition if:\\
1. The sampled columns of the LR matrix span the the columns subspace of $\mathbf{L}$. Lemma \ref{lm3} provides the sufficient conditions on $m_1$ to guarantee that the columns of $\mathbf{L}_{s1}$ span $\mathcal{U}$ with high probability. \\
2. The program (\ref{eq20}) yields the correct LR and sparse components of $\mathbf{D}_{s1}$. Lemma \ref{lm4} provides the sufficient conditions on $m_1$ and $\rho$ to guarantee that $\mathbf{D}_{s1}$ is decomposed correctly with high probability. \\
3. The sampled rows of the LR matrix span the rows subspace of $\mathbf{L}$. Since it is assumed that the CS of $\mathbf{L}$ is sampled from the random orthogonal model, according to Lemma \ref{lm5}
\begin{eqnarray}
\mathbb{P} \left(\max_{i,j} |\mathbf{U} (i,j)|^2 \ge 20\frac{\log N_1}{N_1} \right) \leq 3 r N_1^{-7} \:.
\label{eq32}
\end{eqnarray}
Therefore, according to Lemma \ref{lm3} if
\begin{eqnarray}
m_2 \ge r \log N_1 \max \left( c_2^{'} \log r , c_3^{'} \log \left(\frac{3}{\delta}\right) \right),
\label{eq33}
\end{eqnarray}
then the selected rows of the matrix $\mathbf{L}$ span the rows subspace of $\mathbf{L}$ with probability at least $(1-\delta - 3 r N_1^{-7})$ where $c_2^{'}$ and $c_3^{'}$ are numerical constants.
\\
4. The minimization (\ref{eq23}) yields the correct RS. Lemma \ref{lm8} provides the sufficient conditions to ensure that (\ref{secondrows}) yields the correct representation vector. In order to guarantee the performance of (\ref{eq23}), we substitute $\delta$ with $\delta/N_2$ since (\ref{eq23}) has to return exact representation for the columns of $\mathbf{D}$.
Therefore,
\[
\mathbb{P} \left( \text{Incorrect Decomposition} \right) \leq \delta + c_8 N_1^{-3} + \delta + 3r N_1^{-7} + 3\delta.
\]
\bibliographystyle{IEEEtran}
|
\section{Introduction}
Supercooled liquids are characterized by collective dynamic
fluctuations, known as dynamic heterogeneities, which occur over longer time- and length-scales as the glass transition temperature $T_g$ is approached.
At the molecular scale, these fluctuations imply the correlated motion of an increasingly large number of molecules as relaxation slows down.
To quantify dynamic heterogeneities, a general formalism based on multi-point dynamic correlations was developed over the last years~\cite{dhbook}.
In particular, the four-point dynamic susceptibility $\chi_4(t)$ allows one to evaluate the amplitude of the dynamic fluctuations in numerical simulations~\cite{ensemble} and, at the cost of some approximations, in experiments~\cite{berthier_science}.
Despite these advances, predicting the temperature evolution of dynamic heterogeneities
remains a big challenge and none of the theories proposed so far is conclusive, as they describe experimental and numerical results equally well or poorly~\cite{cavagnareview,glassreview}.
Amongst them, the mode-coupling theory (MCT) is known to be a microscopic and first principles theory of the glass transition~\cite{gotze}.
MCT was initially formulated as a theory of caging in liquids and focused on two-point correlators.
A recent generalization of MCT to inhomogeneous systems (IMCT) enables one to evaluate multi-point correlation functions and make quantitative predictions for dynamic heterogeneities~\cite{imct}.
Within this framework, both relaxation times and dynamic fluctuations diverge
algebraically at the dynamic transition temperature $T_c$.
These divergences are however ``avoided'' in real glass-formers:
The dynamics at low temperature is instead governed by thermal activation, with a distinct super-Arrhenius temperature dependence.
In this regime, dynamic heterogeneities are expected as a manifestation of cooperatively rearranging regions, or mosaics, as predicted by the classic Adam-Gibbs scenario~\cite{adamgibbs}.
The random first order transition theory (RFOT), which was originally inspired by mean-field models of spin glasses, integrates
these two apparently distinct scenarios~\cite{rfot,biroli2009}.
According to RFOT, the dynamic transition predicted by MCT corresponds to the trapping of the system in one of the basins of its rugged free energy landscape.
In the mean-field limit, the dynamics is completely frozen-in at $T_c$,
whereas in finite dimensions the transition is rounded by
thermal activation
and becomes a mere crossover.
Seen from this perspective, the dynamic transition marks a change in the topology of the landscape (also known as ``geometric transition''~\cite{cavagna}): above $T_c$, the system mostly resides close to saddles, whereas below $T_c$ it is trapped close to local minima.
The corresponding real space picture implies the existence of two
distinct length scales characterizing dynamic heterogeneities: a dynamic one, which grows algebraically
on approaching $T_c$,
and a static one corresponding, crudely speaking, to the size of the mosaics.
Experimental data at ambient~\cite{stickel,martinez-garcia} and
high pressure~\cite{casalini}, as well as recent simulation
results~\cite{kob_nature} hint at a dynamic crossover at a temperature
higher than $T_g$.
Around the crossover, however, other physical mechanisms, such as dynamic facilitation~\cite{keys} and/or local structure
formation~\cite{tanaka}, may play an important role and compete with the mean-field scenario.
Indeed, several predictions of the IMCT/mean-field framework remain so far undetected.
First, the fitted power law exponents describing the growth of $\chi_4$ and the dynamic correlation length do not completely agree with the ones predicted by IMCT~\cite{karmakar}.
Moreover, according to MCT and IMCT, dynamic fluctuations grow near $T_c$ but the single-particle dynamics remains essentially Gaussian.
This counter-intuitive behavior is absent in standard glass-formers, for which $\chi_4$ and the non-Gaussian parameter $\alpha_2$ are typically correlated and grow concomitantly as the dynamics slows down~\cite{vogel}.
Finally, the saddles that become marginally stable at $T_c$ should be
delocalized~\cite{biroli2009}, but no trace of such extended modes was
detected in the potential energy surface of common
glass-formers~\cite{daniele1}.
In this paper, we put the mean-field scenario to a crucial test by studying the approach to the dynamic transition in the Gaussian core model (GCM)~\cite{stillingergcm}.
Conventional model glass formers, such as Lennard-Jones and hard sphere fluids, are characterized by short-range, harshly repulsive potentials.
In the GCM, instead, particles interact via an ultra-soft repulsive potential
$v(r) = \epsilon e^{-(r/\sigma)^2}$~\cite{stillingergcm,likos}, whose \textit{tail} plays a key role at high density.
At sufficiently high density, the
GCM becomes a good glass-former and its average dynamics is well described by MCT~\cite{gcm,gcmdynamics}.
Simulations of the high-density GCM are computationally expensive, due to the large number of neighbors each particle is interacting with.
Therefore, characterizing dynamic fluctuations and the energy landscape of this model requires a major overhaul of the numerical protocol compared to previous studies~\cite{gcm,gcmdynamics}.
By employing state-of-art molecular dynamics simulations on graphics processor units (GPU), we demonstrate that the GCM provides a striking incarnation of mean-field dynamic criticality in a three-dimensional system and provides a solid reference to understand how and when the mean-field scenario is washed out in more common glass-formers.
\section{Methods}\label{sec:methods}
We use molecular dynamics simulations in the NVT ensemble with a
Nose-Hoover thermostat to study $N=4000$ monodisperse GCM
particles.
The potential is cut and shifted and smoothed at
$r_c=4.5\sigma$ with the XPLOR cutoff~\cite{hoomdurl}, which ensures continuity of the force at the cutoff.
For the energy landscape analysis we choose a smaller system ($N=2000$).
In the following, we will use $\sigma$, $10^{-6}\epsilon$, and
$10^{-6}\epsilon/k_B$ as units of the length, energy, and temperature, respectively.
We focus on supercooled fluids along the isochore $\rho=2.0$, for which the thermodynamically stable state is the BCC crystal (for $T<8.2$)~\cite{gcm,gcmstatic}.
The crystallization kinetics is very slow and virtually negligible in our simulations~\cite{gcm,gcmdynamics}.
We note that the density is much higher than $\rho \approx 0.24$, the re-entrant melting density of GCM~\cite{lang,prestipino,gcmstatic}.
In the low density limit, the GCM approaches asymptotyically the three-dimensional hard sphere model~\cite{stillingergcm}.
In this regime, the physics of model differs markedly from the one observed at high density.
To ensure good statistics on the four-point dynamic susceptibility, we performed four independent production runs
for each temperature and the simulation time for each trajectory was
typically 100 times longer than the structural relaxation time $\tau_\alpha$ (see below).
Computer simulations of the GCM in the high density, supercooled regime are computationally demanding and require particular care.
Due to quasi-long range nature of the potential and the large statistics needed to evaluate $\chi_4$, the simulation protocol must be efficient.
Moreover, in contrast to systems with harshly repulsive interactions, the force summation is not dominated by the first coordination shell and involves a large number of atoms.
This, in turn, rises obvious issues of numerical accuracy.
To tackle these issues, we employed the HOOMD simulation package~\cite{hoomdurl, anderson, hoomd2}, a state-of-art molecular dynamics code running on graphic processor units (GPU) with double precision arithmetics.
HOOMD is currently one of the few simulation codes running entirely on GPU that allows double precision evaluation of \textit{both} the forces and the integration step.
We checked the results obtained with HOOMD against those of in-house simulation codes running on CPU
over the available temperature range and found them to be nicely consistent.
An initial batch of simulations was performed using the RUMD simulation package~\cite{rumd_arxiv}.
RUMD implements the force calculation in single precision, which turns out to be insufficient for the GCM at high density.
In fact, small but systematic differences between the simulations performed with RUMD and with our in-house codes appeared at sufficiently low temperature, in both NVE and NVT ensembles.
These data sets were not retained in the analysis.
The stationary points of the potential energy surface (PES) were located using standard numerical strategies adopted in earlier studies on LJ mixtures~\cite{cavagna}.
To locate local minima and saddle points we minimized the total potential energy $U$ and the total force squared
\begin{eqnarray}
W=\frac{1}{N}\sum_{i=1}^N f_i^2
\end{eqnarray}
where $f_i$ is the norm of the force vector on particle $i$
respectively, using the LBFGS minimization algorithm~\cite{liu__1989}.
For each studied temperature, we considered 80 independent configurations as starting points of our $U$- and $W$-minimizations.
Due to the large system size and the long range cutoff, $U$- and $W$-minimizations for the GCM are technically more difficult than for LJ mixtures.
To reduce the computational burden without biasing the results, we used a smaller system size ($N=2000$) compared to the one used to characterize the dynamics ($N=4000$).
We note that for $N=2000$ particle at $\rho=2.0$ the box length $L=10$ is only slightly larger than
twice the cutoff distance.
Due to softness of the potential and the large number of interacting particles, minimizations require high numerical precision as well as a smooth cut-off scheme.
Thanks to the XPLOR cutoff, we could converge $U$-minimizations to values of the mean squared total force of order $W\approx 10^{-13}$.
For most of the configurations we located this way, the dynamical matrix contained no imaginary modes.
$U$-minimizations that did not converge to true minima were therefore discarded from the analysis.
The fraction of discarded configurations ranged from less than 10\% (close to $T_c$) to about 20\% (at the highest temperatures).
We note however that inclusion of such spurious configurations does not alter the average inherent structure energy within statistical noise.
To try to improve the convergence, we replaced the XPLOR cutoff by a smoother, cubic interpolation scheme~\cite{cavagna} during the minimization.
We found that the cubic splined cutoff did not improve appreciably the accuracy of the minimizations compared to the XPLOR cutoff.
This indicates that the main numerical difficulty lies in the high dimensionality of the system, which makes the minimization problem ill-conditioned.
$W$-minimizations are known to locate \textit{true} saddle points only rarely~\cite{sampoli__2003}.
Most of the points located through such a procedure are, in fact, \textit{quasi}-saddles, i.e. local minima of $W$ with finite $W$ values.
Our minimization algorithm locates configurations with $W$ of the order $10^{-11}$, which is close to but still larger than the threshold we used for local minima ($W=10^{-13}$).
We conclude that the points located by our $W$-minimizations should be considered as quasi-saddles.
Previous studies showed however that the statistical properties of quasi-saddles and true saddles are practically indistinguishable~\cite{sampoli__2003}.
On this basis, we assumed the equivalence of these two types of points in our analysis.
\section{Results}
\begin{figure}
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{fig1.eps}
\caption{\label{si:tau}
Relaxation times $\tau_{\alpha}$ (red filled circles) and inverse diffusion constants $D^{-1}$ (red open circles)
of the GCM as a function of the reduced temperature $\varepsilon = T/T_c - 1$.
The $D^{-1}$ of the GCM obtained in Ref.~\cite{gcm} (black crosses) are also plotted.
The dashed lines are fits to $\tau_{\alpha} \approx \varepsilon^{-\gamma}$ with $\gamma=2.7$ and
$D^{-1} \approx \varepsilon^{-\gamma}$ with $\gamma=2.6$.
}
\end{figure}
Before investigating dynamic heterogeneities, we study the relaxation dynamics of the model close to $T_c$.
We measured the time-dependent overlap function defined by
$\ave{\hat{F}(t)} = \ave{ N^{-1} \sum_i \Theta (|\Delta \vec{R}_i(t)| - a)}$,
where $\Delta \vec{R}_i(t)$ is the displacement of the $i$-th particle
in the time interval $t$, $\Theta(x)$ is the Heavyside's step function, and we choose
$a=0.3$, which maximizes the four-point susceptibility defined later.
$\ave{\hat{F}(t)}$ gives the average fraction of particles which moved more than $a$ after a time $t$.
The relaxation time $\tau_{\alpha}$ is defined by $\ave{\hat{F}(t=\tau_{\alpha})}=e^{-1}$.
Our equilibrium simulations extend down to $T=2.8$, which corresponds to a relaxation time 4
times longer than those accessible to previous simulations~\cite{gcm,gcmdynamics}.
The increase of $\tau_\alpha$ becomes non-Arrhenius
around the onset temperature $T_o=5.0$
and displays a power law behavior
$\tau_\alpha \sim \varepsilon^{-\gamma}$ at low temperature.
{Figure~\ref{si:tau} compares the relaxation times $\tau_{\alpha}$ and the diffusion constants $D$ obtained in this work to those of Ref.~\cite{gcm}.
The data are plotted against the reduced temperature $\varepsilon = T/T_c - 1$.
The mode-coupling temperature $T_c$ was determined following the standard fitting procedure: we fixed the exponent
$\gamma=2.7$, obtained by solving the MCT equation for the GCM, and then determined $T_c$ by linear regression of
$\tau_{\alpha}^{-1/\gamma}$ against $T$ in the range $T \leq 3.2$.
The so obtained value of $T_c = 2.68$ is only 20\% smaller than the theoretical prediction ($T_c=3.2$),
which should be contrasted with more than 100\% for the Kob-Andersen
Lennard-Jones (KA) mixture~\cite{ka, grzegorzka}.
We point out that the MCT power-law fit works for a wider range of $\varepsilon$, viz. down to $\varepsilon=0.037$, than in the KA mixture, for which deviations are already apparent around $\varepsilon=0.1$~\cite{ka, grzegorzka}.
Furthermore, the new simulations allow us to detect a slight discrepancy between the exponents that fit the relaxation times ($\gamma=2.7$) and the inverse diffusion constants ($\gamma=2.6$).
In the latter case, we fixed the critical temperature $T_c$ to the one obtained from the relaxation times analysis and only adjusted the power law amplitude and exponent.
These minor deviations from MCT predictions should be contrasted to those found in other models, which are typically around 20--25\%.
We note that the small discrepancy between $\tau$ and $1/D$ observed in the GCM could be explained even within the framework of the MCT itself, as discussed in Ref.~\cite{biroli__2004}.
}
\begin{figure}[t]
\psfig{file=fig2.eps,width=8.5cm,clip}
\caption{\label{fig1}
Left: non-Gaussian parameter $\alpha_2(t)$ of the GCM (red circles) at $T=5.0$, 3.4, 3.0 and 2.9,
and of type A particles of the KA mixture~\cite{ka} (empty squares) at $T=1.0$, 0.6, 0.5 and 0.466.
Right: four-point susceptibility $\chi_4(t)$ of the GCM (red circles) at $T=4.0$, 3.0, 2.9 and 2.8,
and of the KA~\cite{karmakar} (empty squares) at $T=0.55$, 0.5, 0.47 and 0.45.
Downward arrows indicate the corresponding relaxation times $\tau_{\alpha}$ of the GCM.
Time $t$ is scaled by $\tau_{o}$, the relaxation time at the onset temperature $T_o$.
($T_o = 5.0$ and $\tau_o = 3100$ for the GCM, and $T_o=1.0$ and $\tau_o = 15$ for the KA in the unit of Ref.~\cite{ka})
All data sets in the right panel are obtained from molecular dynamics simulations in the NVT ensemble.
}
\end{figure}
To characterize dynamic heterogeneities in the GCM, we consider two different observables.
First, we evaluate the non-Gaussian parameter $\alpha_2(t) = 3\ave{\Delta R(t)^4}/5\ave{\Delta R(t)^2}^2 -1$,
which quantifies how much the particles' displacements deviates from a Gaussian distribution.
In the left panel of Fig.~\ref{fig1}, we plot $\alpha_2(t)$ for the KA mixture
and the GCM for similar relaxation time windows.
$\alpha_2(t)$ of the KA mixture grows rapidly as the temperature is decreased whereas the growth of $\alpha_2(t)$ of the GCM is moderate.
This observation is consistent with the shape of the van Hove functions
$G_s(r,t) = \ave{ N^{-1} \sum_i \delta (|\Delta R_i(t)| - r)}$ near $t=\tau_{\alpha}$.
{Figure~\ref{si:dis} shows the probability distribution of the logarithm of single-particle displacements,
which is related to the van Hove functions as $P(\log_{10} r, t) \equiv (\ln 10)4 \pi r^3 G_s(r,t)$, of the GCM at $T=3.0$ and 2.8.
For standard model glass formers, the shape of this distribution function is bimodal close to $T_c$,
which proves the existence of hopping-like motion~\cite{grzegorzka}.
For the GCM, by contrast, the distribution functions remains unimodal even at the lowest investigated temperature.
The absence of hopping-like motion in the GCM is consistent with our analysis of the potential energy landscape (see below) which indicates that thermally activated relaxation is strongly suppressed.
We conclude that the distribution of single-particle mobility in the GCM is homogeneous, even when the slow dynamics is well developed.}
The shape of $G_s(r,t)$ of the KA mixture is bimodal, indicating
coexistence of highly mobile and immobile particles~\cite{grzegorzka}, while that of the GCM remains unimodal
even at the lowest temperature.
\begin{figure}
\includegraphics[width=1.0\columnwidth]{fig3.eps}
\caption{\label{si:dis}
Probability distribution of the logarithm of the particle displacements $P(\log_{10} r, t) \equiv (\ln 10)4 \pi r^3 G_s(r,t)$.
Top: results for $T = 3.0$. From left to right, $t/\tau_o$ = 4, 17, 68, 271 and 1082, where $\tau_{\alpha} / \tau_o = 75$.
Bottom: results for $T = 2.8$.
From left to right, $t/\tau_o$ = 34, 135, 406, 812, 3112 and 8659, where $\tau_{\alpha} / \tau_o = 813$.
}
\end{figure}
Next, we evaluate the four-point dynamic susceptibility defined by
$\chi_4(t) = N[\ave{\hat{F}(t)^2} - \ave{\hat{F}(t)}^2]$, which
quantifies the cooperative motion of particles in fluids~\cite{glotzer,karmakar}.
Strikingly, the trend is now reversed as shown in the right panel of
Fig.~\ref{fig1}:
$\chi_4(t)$ grows far more strongly in the GCM than in the KA mixture.
Around $T_c$, the maximum of $\chi_4(t)$, called herein $\chi_4^*$, in the GCM is
one order of magnitude larger than that of the KA mixture.
Note that while the dynamic susceptibility depends in general on the statistical ensemble,
this result holds also in the ensemble where all global variables are allowed to fluctuate (see Appendix).
Thus dynamic fluctuations in the GCM are significantly larger than those in other standard models around $T_c$.
The opposite trends of $\alpha_2(t)$ and $\chi_4(t)$ may look
contradicting at a first glance.
This
implies that the nature of dynamic heterogeneities of the GCM is qualitatively different from other conventional glass formers.
Large values of $\alpha_2(t)$
are a direct consequence of the large displacements of individual mobile particles and do not
necessarily reflect the extent of cooperative motion.
On the other hand, $\chi_4(t)$ is defined as the variance of the
overlap function, which does not depend on how far the mobile particles
have moved, and it is thus more sensitive to the net cooperativity.
Therefore, the suppression of $\alpha_2(t)$ and the concomitant enhancement of $\chi_4(t)$ in the GCM
imply {\it slight but spatially extended modulations of the mobility field}.
\begin{figure*}[!ht]
\includegraphics[width=.8\linewidth]{fig4.eps}
\caption{\label{si:snap}
Typical snapshots of the particles' mobility field at a temperature $T=2.9$. Particles are shown as spheres of radius proportional to the mobility $\delta r(t,t_0)$ after a time $t=4\times{10}^{5}\approx \tau_{\alpha}$. The time origins $t_0$ at which the configurations are shown are separated by at least 10 structural relaxation times.
}
\end{figure*}
These inferences are confirmed by visual inspection of the mobility field close to the dynamical critical temperature.
To visulalize the giant dynamic fluctuations that give rise to the increase of $\chi_4$ close to the dynamic transition, we evaluate the mobility of the particles after time $t$ as $\delta r_i(t,t_0) = |\vec{r}_i(t+t_0) - \vec{r}_i(t_0)|$.
In Figure~\ref{si:snap} we show typical snapshots of the mobility field at $T=2.9$, close to the dynamic transition.
At this temperature, the maximum of the dynamic susceptibility has reached about 200.
The radii of the spheres are proportional to the particles' displacements after a time $t=4\times10^{5}\approx \tau_{\alpha}$.
We clearly see that the mobility field is characterized by extended regions of either mobile or immobile particles, with very smooth variations over space.
Note that no coarse-graining or time averaging is involved in our calculation of $\delta r$.
Visual inspection suggests that the correlation length is comparable to the system size at this temperature.
This is in turn compatible with the existence of finite size effects around and below this temperature.
\begin{figure}[t]
\psfig{file=fig5.eps,width=8.5cm,clip}
\caption{\label{fig2}
Maximum value of the dynamic susceptibility, $\chi_{4}^{\ast}$,
against the reduced temperature $\varepsilon =T/T_c - 1$ in the GCM (red circles) and
in the KA mixture~\cite{karmakar} (empty squares), where
$T_c = 2.68$ for the GCM and $T_c = 0.435$ for the KA.
The solid line is the IMCT prediction, $\chi_4^{\ast} \sim \varepsilon^{-2}$.
The inset shows the histogram of the overlap between two configurations $\hat{F}(t)$
with the time interval $t=\tau_{\alpha}$ for the GCM at $T=3.0$ and 2.8.
}
\end{figure}
The coexistence of giant dynamic heterogeneities and Gaussian-like
dynamics is a strong evidence of mean-field dynamic criticality.
According to MCT and IMCT,
the amplitude of $\alpha_2(t)$ remain small~\cite{fuchs1998}, whereas
$\chi_4^{\ast}$ diverges on approaching $T_c$ with an exponent
that depends on both microscopic dynamics and statistical ensemble~\cite{imct,ensemble,grzegorzdh}.
For molecular dynamics simulations in the NVT ensemble, the
susceptibility is predicted to diverge as $\chi_4^{\ast} \sim \varepsilon^{-2}$.
Figure~\ref{fig2} shows the dependence of $\chi_4^{\ast}$ on $\varepsilon$.
The data for the KA mixture are not well described by IMCT, whereas
for the GCM $\chi_{4}^{\ast}$ follows the power law predicted by the theory over the range of temperature $2.8<T\leq 3.4$.
We emphasize that in Fig.~\ref{fig2} the critical temperatures $T_c$ are those obtained by fitting the relaxation times data.
Our data demonstrate that $\tau$, $1/D$, and $\chi_4^*$ can be fitted by power laws over
comparable $\varepsilon$ ranges and using the appropriate set of MCT exponents.
Deviations from the IMCT prediction are observed only at the
lowest temperature in Fig.~\ref{fig2}.
This deviation is most likely due to finite size effects, which will naturally appear if $\chi_4(t)$ has a genuine divergence, rather than to the crossover between MCT and activated regimes.
In the inset of Fig.~\ref{fig2}, we plot the histogram of the
overlap $\hat{F}(t)$ for the GCM at $t=\tau_{\alpha}$.
By definition, the mean value of the histogram is $\ave{\hat{F}(t=\tau_{\alpha})}= e^{-1}$.
Indeed, the histogram at $T=3.0$ is unimodal with the mean value of
$e^{-1}$, whereas it becomes very broad at $T=2.8$, suggesting
that a correlation length becomes comparable to the system size.
We note that such strong finite size effects were not observed in the KA mixture~\cite{karmakar,berthier_fs}.
We now proceed to discuss the dynamics of the GCM from the perspective of the energy landscape~\cite{goldstein,sastry}.
According to the RFOT scenario, the MCT crossover should be accompanied by a
``geometric'' transition in the energy landscape~\cite{cavagnareview}:
in mean-field, the unstable modes separating the free energy minima become marginally
stable as $T_c$ is approached and eventually disappear below a certain
threshold energy~\cite{cavagna}.
In finite dimensions, remnants of this geometrical transition
should be visible in the potential energy landscape around the
MCT crossover: Above $T_c$ the system relaxes mostly via unstable soft modes,
while activated relaxation over energy barriers takes over below
$T_c$.
The crossover between the two regimes takes place at an energy threshold
$e_{\mbox{\scriptsize th}}$, below which the system resides mostly close to local minima of
the potential energy instead of stationary points of arbitrary order.
Early numerical simulations of the KA mixture gave support to
this scenario and found a crossover temperature $T_{\mbox{\scriptsize th}}$ very close to
$T_c$~\cite{cavagna,angelani}, but were later on called into question~\cite{berthier_garrahan,wales_doye}.
\begin{figure}[t]
\psfig{file=fig6.eps,width=8.5cm,clip}
\caption{\label{fig3}
Analysis of the potential energy landscape of the GCM.
(a) Energy of saddle points $e_{\mbox{\scriptsize sad}}$ as a function of the fraction of unstable modes $f$.
The solid line is a linear fit $e_{\mbox{\scriptsize sad}} = e_{\mbox{\scriptsize th}} + (3\Delta e) f$ with $e_{\mbox{\scriptsize th}} = 1.70$ and $\Delta e/T_c = 15.2$.
(b) The inherent structure energy $e_{is}$ vs. temperature.
The horizontal dashed line indicates $e_{\mbox{\scriptsize th}} = 1.70$.
Vertical arrows indicate the MCT temperature $T_c = 2.68$ and the onset temperature $T_o = 5.0$.
(c) Distributions of the participation ratio of unstable modes of the KA mixture ($N=2000$)
at $T =0.45$ and of the GCM at $T = 2.9$.
}
\end{figure}
To determine the statistics of stationary points, we located minima and saddles by applying the LBFGS
minimization algorithm to the total potential energy $U$ and to the total force $W$
respectively~\cite{daniele1} (see Sec.~\ref{sec:methods}).
Although local minima of $W$ do not necessarily correspond to true stationary points~\cite{wales_doye}, $W$-minimizations yield a fairly robust measurement of the energy threshold $e_{\mbox{\scriptsize th}}$ and of the typical energy barriers~\cite{angelani}.
Figure~\ref{fig3}(a) shows the saddle point energy,
$e_{\mbox{\scriptsize sad}}$, as obtained from $W$-minimizations, against
the fraction of unstable modes $f$ found in the spectrum of the
dynamical matrix
\footnote{The potential energy is displayed after subtracting the
trivial ``uniform'' contribution
$\epsilon(\rho \sigma^3 \pi^{3/2}-1)/2$ out. See~\cite{gcmstatic}.}.
As in other models, these two quantifies are roughly linearly related.
From a linear fit $e_{\mbox{\scriptsize sad}} = e_{\mbox{\scriptsize th}} + (3\Delta e) f$ we extract the threshold energy $e_{\mbox{\scriptsize th}} = 1.70$.
Comparing this with the temperature dependence of the energy of minima $e_{m}$ (Fig.~\ref{fig3} (b)),
we obtain a threshold temperature $T_{\mbox{\scriptsize th}} \approx 2.7$ in excellent agreement with $T_c$.
The slope $\Delta e$ gives an estimate of the average barrier height,
since it is the energy cost to increase by one the order of a stationary
point~\cite{cavagna}.
We found $\Delta e/T_c = 15.2$ in the GCM, which is appreciably larger $\Delta e/T_c \approx 10$ observed in other model glass formers~\cite{cavagnareview,coslovich_network}.
We estimate that the increased barrier height hampers the activated relaxation by a factor $\exp(15)/\exp(10) \approx 150$.
As the activated relaxation channels are strongly suppressed, the
MCT-like critical behavior dominates the slow dynamics of the model~\cite{cavagna}.
Further support for the geometric transition scenario is provided by the analysis of the mode localization.
It has been argued that the unstable directions that disappear at the dynamic transition are
\textit{delocalized} in the mean-field scenario~\cite{biroli2009}.
This contrasts with the typical observation that unstable modes of
common glass-formers become increasingly localized as $T$ decreases~\cite{daniele2}.
To evaluate the spatial localization of the unstable modes, we calculate their participation ratio $p$ on a per-mode basis
\begin{eqnarray}
p(\omega) = \left\langle \left( N \sum_i (\vec{e}_i(\omega) \cdot \vec{e}_i(\omega))^2 \right)^{-1} \right\rangle
\end{eqnarray}
where $\vec{e}_i(\omega)$ is the displacement of particle $i$ along the eigenvector corresponding to the eigenfrequency $\omega$.
In Fig.~\ref{fig3}(c) we plot the distribution of the
participation ratio of unstable modes
around $T_c$.
As in various conventional glass formers~\cite{daniele2}, the unstable
modes of the KA mixture have small participation ratios and are therefore spatially localized.
By contrast, the distribution is broader in the GCM and considerably
shifted towards larger value of $p$ ($0.6$ for plane waves, 1 for
completely delocalized modes).
Visual inspection suggests that these modes have a complex spatial structure, in which some groups of particles undergo cooperative motions, while others display incoherent displacements.
While determining the precise nature of the modes in the GCM would
While determining the precise nature of the modes in the GCM would require an analysis of $N$-dependence of the spectrum,
and thus of the mobility edge~\cite{bembenek}, our analysis suggests that the giant
dynamic heterogeneities of the GCM might indeed be associated to these extended unstable modes.
In the KA mixture, instead, dynamic heterogeneities build up through dynamic facilitation of localized elementary rearrangements~\cite{keys},
which might be related to modes localized outside locally stable domains~\cite{daniele2}.
\section{Conclusions}
In summary, we presented evidence that the mean-field scenario predicting diverging dynamic fluctuations and a geometric transition close to the dynamic transition can be observed in a three-dimensional model system at sufficiently high density.
Our results shed new light on the physical nature of dynamic heterogeneities predicted by
IMCT.
The approach to the dynamic transition is accompanied by rapidly growing
dynamic correlations and by the disappearance of extended unstable modes
of the potential energy landscape.
We identify a clear fingerprint of mean-field dynamic criticality,
that is, the coexistence of the strong dynamic fluctuations and nearly
Gaussian distribution of a single particle displacement.
Which finite-dimensional features (e.g. locally preferred structures,
dynamic facilitation) mask the
mean-field physics in actual supercooled liquids is a question that need
to be addressed in future studies.
\acknowledgments
We thank two anonymous reviewers for useful remarks and constructive criticisms on a previous version of the manuscript.
We acknowledge the HPCLR
Center of Competence in High-Performance Computing of Languedoc-Roussillon (France)
and ACCMS of Kyoto University (Japan) for allocation of CPU time.
A.I. acknowledges the financial support from JSPS postdoctoral fellowship for research abroad and KAKENHI No. 26887021.
K.M. is supported by KAKENHI No.
24340098,
25103005,
and 25000002.
|
\section{Introduction}
\label{sec:introduction}
The early idea that any central triaxial massive component embedded in
a stellar disc could be efficient enough to bring gas close to the
nucleus \citep[e.g.][]{1982modg.proc..113K} has for a long time turned
the attention of both observers and theoreticians to the fruitful
framework of ``bars within bars'' \citep{1989Natur.338...45S} preceded
by a few works dealing with triaxial bulges
\citep[e.g.][]{1988MNRAS.233..337L}. At that time, the bars within
bars scenario was sustained by a few crucial observations
\citep[e.g.][]{1974IAUS...58..335D, 1986ApJS...61..631B}. Since then,
the observation of small samples of double-barred galaxies
\citep[e.g.][]{1993AJ....105.1344B, 1995A&AS..111..115W} laid the
groundwork for larger samples, less biased, that has refined the
global picture by removing from the list of prototypes a few false
detections made in the optical and adding a lot of new examples mainly
detected in the near infrared \citep[][for a comprehensive
review]{2011MSAIS..18..145E}.
However, the formation of nuclear bars has remained puzzling in spite
of the efforts made by several groups to perform realistic modelling of
these complex systems. Our difficulty in creating a standard scenario
for the evolution of the central kpc is certainly not due to the lack
of models that show how the stellar material can be assembled
to form the inner bar, but rather is due to the coexistence of several
credible physical mechanisms. Most of these mechanisms have been
studied mainly through numerical simulations (N$-$body and/or
hydrodynamical simulations) although orbit analysis
\citep{1997ApJ...484L.117M,2000MNRAS.313..745M,2010ApJ...719..622M}
has helped a lot to understand the foundation of double-bar dynamics.
The double-bar formation scenarios can first be divided into two major
classes: either the large-scale bar forms first, i.e. before the inner
one, or the contrary. The first case is sustained by early theoretical
works \citep{1989Natur.338...45S}, simulations with a gaseous
component present \citep{1993A&A...277...27F, 1994mtia.conf..170C,
1996A&AS..118..461F}, but also pure collisionless simulations
\citep{1999A&A...348..737R,2006A&A...447..453C} making the need for a
gaseous component questionable if the initial stellar disc is
dynamically hot and embedded in a massive halo. The second case was
considered hypothetical until \citet{2007ApJ...654L.127D}
created such examples by fine tuning the initial conditions of their
collisionless simulations. One can argue that a third case should
exist, that is the two bars growing simultaneously
\citep{2013MNRAS.433L..44S}. It seems in all cases that the outer bar forms
slightly before the inner bar.
Whatever the formation scenario is, the main concern with inner bars
formed in N$-$body/hydrodynamical simulations is that they are
short-lived because the central gas concentration naturally tends to
destroy the bar. However, the lifetime of any nuclear bar must be long
enough to be compatible with the high frequency of double-bars:
30~\%\ of barred galaxies or 20~\%\ of all galaxies
\citep{2011MSAIS..18..145E}. Past simulations that were able to
produce long-lived double-barred models
\citep[e.g.][]{2002MNRAS.337.1233R,2007ApJ...654L.127D} are either 2D
or purely collisionless.
We show here that 3D N$-$body/hydrodynamical simulations,
implementing classical star formation recipes, are able to create
long-lived double-barred galaxies. We identify the dynamical and
physical processes whereby a double-barred system can survive on
several Gyr.
This paper is focused on the long-term evolution of double-barred
galaxies. In Sect.~\ref{sec:model} we describe our simulations and
introduce postprocessing techniques. The evolution of the central
region is addressed in detail in Sect.~\ref{sec:evol}. As forthcoming
papers dealing with other aspects of double-barred galaxies will be
based on this topic, we give a detailed description there. We compare the
properties of simulations with observational constraints in
Sect.~\ref{sec:comparison}. Finally, we discuss our results in
Sect.~\ref{sec:discussion} and conclude in the last section.
\section{Description of the numerical simulations}
\label{sec:model}
\begin{table*}
\caption{Main initial parameters: name of the run (Model), simulation
length, numbers of stellar ($N_\mathrm{s}$) and gas ($N_\mathrm{g}$)
particles, masses and scalelengths of the two Miyamoto-Nagai initial
distributions ($M_1, M_2, l_1, l_2$), mass and scalelength of the gas
distribution ($M_\mathrm{g}, l_\mathrm{g}$). The last column contains
the number of stellar particles at the end of the simulation
($N_\mathrm{s}^\mathrm{end}$).}
\label{tab:simul}
\flushleft
\begin{tabular}{lrrrcclllrrrr}
\hline \hline
Model & End& $N_\mathrm{s}$ & $N_\mathrm{_g}$ & $M_1$ & $M_2$ & $l_1$ & $l_2$ & $M_\mathrm{g}$ & $l_\mathrm{g}$ & $N_\mathrm{s}^\mathrm{end}$ & \cr
&(Myr)&$\times 10^{6}$&$\times 10^{4}$&$\times 10^{11}$ M$_{\sun}$&$\times 10^{11}$ M$_{\sun}$&(kpc)&(kpc)&$\times 10^{11}$ M$_{\sun}$&(kpc)&$\times 10^{6}$ & \cr
\hline
{\tt SimL} & 9486& 2.5 &5 & 0.1 & 1.0 & 1.5 & 6.5 &0.11 & 6.0 & 3.32& \cr
{\tt SimS} & 5798& 2.5 &5 & 0.1 & 1.0 & 1.0 & 3.5 &0.11 & 3.0 & 3.21& \cr
\hline
\end{tabular}
\end{table*}
We performed several simulations of disc galaxies varying mainly
the initial disc scale lengths and the gas contents. For each
simulation, the conditions for the initial stellar and gaseous
populations were computed as follows. The initial stellar
population was set up to reproduce a typical disc galaxy. The positions
and velocities for $N_s$ particles were drawn from a superposition of
two axisymmetrical \citet{MN75} discs of mass respectively $M_1$ and
$M_2$ (cf. Table~\ref{tab:simul}). The shape of Miyamoto \& Nagai
density distribution depends on the choice of two parameters,
traditionally called $a$ and $b$. The \citet{1911MNRAS..71..460P} sphere
($a=0$) and the \citet{k56} flat disc ($b=0$) are the two extreme
possible distributions. The use of Miyamoto \& Nagai distributions
enabled us to create initial conditions very close to typical disc
galaxies. The real radial scale lengths are respectively $l_1=a_1+b$
and $l_2=a_2+b$. We chose a scale height of $b=0.5$~kpc common
to all simulations. Thus, with our choice of parameters
(cf. Table~\ref{tab:simul}), the first component can be viewed as
representing a bulge, the second one a disc, with the main
advantage that there is no discontinuity in either the mass density
distribution or the gravitational forces. The initial velocity
dispersions were computed by solving numerically the Jeans equations. The
gaseous component is represented by $N_g$ particles for a total mass
of $M_g$ distributed in a $l_g$ scalelength Miyamoto-Nagai disc.
Some differences in the initial conditions should be noted.
The disc scalelength of {\tt SimL}\ ($l_2=6.5$~kpc, hence the "L" for
"long") is almost twice that of {\tt SimS}\ (3.5~kpc, "S" for "short") for
the same scaleheight ($b=0.5$~kpc). The dynamical timescales of the
stellar bar development should thus be longer for {\tt SimL}\ than for
{\tt SimS}.
The dynamical evolution was computed with a particle--mesh N-body code
that includes stars, gas, and recipes to simulate star formation. The
broad outlines of the code are the following. The gravitational forces
are computed with a particle--mesh method using a 3D polar grid with
$(N_R, N_\phi, N_Z)=(60,64,312)$ active cells, leading to a vertical
sampling of 50~pc. The smallest radial cell in the central region is
36~pc large. The hydrodynamics equations are solved using the SPH
technique, following closely the implementation suggested by
\citet{b90}. Since we used a log--polar grid, we improved the
pre-computation of self-forces by subdividing each cell in $(n_r,
n_\phi, n_z)=(32,6,6)$ subcells. Self-forces were then linearly
interpolated before being subtracted from gravitational forces. The
spatial and forces resolutions are thus much higher than in our
previous studies based on the same code
\citep[e.g.][]{2006A&A...452...97M,2006MNRAS.369..853W}.
The star formation and feedback modelling is based on the
instantaneous star formation approximation \citep[see][and reference
therein, for details]{2004A&A...421..863M}. The major steps are 1)
the identification of the regions where star formation can be ignited,
2) the conversion of a fraction of gas into stars, and 3) the
computation of the amount of energy and metals injected in the
interstellar medium (i.e. the energy and chemical feedback from type
II supernovae -- SNII). Because the last step leads to gas
heating, a simple treatment of radiative cooling is implemented
in the energy equation.
The first task is to identify the gaseous particles that will form
stars. \citet{FB93} examined some possible criteria. Not surprisingly,
they found that the standard Jeans instability criterion can be
applied to spherical non-rotating gaseous systems, but for
rotating flat discs that Toomre's instability criterion
\citep{1964ApJ...139.1217T} is a better indicator. Observational
evidence also appears to support the use of this criterion as a good
indicator for locating star formation at intermediate scalelengths
\citep[][and references therein]{1998ARA&A..36..189K}. In all cases, a
particle $i$ will be assumed to undergo a star formation episode if
the following condition is verified,
$$
Q_{i}^{g} = \frac{s_{i}\kappa_{i}}{\pi G \Sigma_{i}^{g}} \leq \lambda
,$$ where $Q_i^g$ is Toomre's parameter, $s_{i}$ is the local sound
speed, $\kappa_{i}$ is the generalized epicyclic frequency, and
$\Sigma_{i}^{g}$ is the gas surface density. The constant $\lambda$
equals unity in the case of an axisymmetric gaseous disc subject to
radial instabilities \citep[cf.][]{1964ApJ...139.1217T}. However, a
value of $\lambda \approx 1.4$ (with $s = 6$ km s$^{-1}$) has been
derived from observations \citep{1990ASSL..161..405K}. Since we intend
to reproduce realistic conditions for star formation, we adopted the same value for $\lambda$.
The pattern speed $\Omega_\mathrm{p}$\ of the large-scale bar is easily determined
using its position-angle measured every 10~Myr during the simulation
run. Any post-processing technique applied on snapshots (spaced by
50~Myr) or on movies (timestep of 1~Myr) gives the same results. For
the nuclear or inner bar, the determination of $\Omega_\mathrm{s}$\ is
more difficult. The initial size of the nuclear bar is unpredictable, and so it is
difficult to catch its position-angle in real time during the
simulation run. The snapshot sampling (every 50~Myr) is too long to
make a proper measurement as the rotation period of the nuclear bar can
be much shorter. Therefore, the nuclear position-angle was determined
directly from the movies using the inertia moment technique confirmed by
eye measurements. However, the errors can be large (typically $\approx
2$~Myr on rotation period measurements), especially when the nuclear
bar rotation period $T_\mathrm{s}$ is of the order of a few tens of
Myr. A Fourier transform technique (as used by
\citealp{2011MNRAS.417..762Q}) is unapplicable here because of the
frequency cutoff. Therefore, for a few periods of interest,
simulations have been partly recomputed using a smaller output
timestep (1~Myr) in order to apply this technique (see
Sect.~\ref{sec:discussion}). For these particular periods, this
technique confirms our manual measurements well within our
conservative error bars.
The terminology used in the case of double-barred galaxies is wide and
thus confusing. We thus clarify hereby what terms will be used
throughout this paper. The simulations will represent double-barred
galaxies, which means two stellar bars will coexist. A \emph{\emph{primary}}
bar is the main bar with respect to its size. It is a large-scale
structure. It is often named \emph{\emph{large-scale}} bar. This does not
imply that it appears first, even if this is the case for our
simulations. A \emph{\emph{secondary}} bar is a smaller stellar structure
embedded in the primary bar. However, it is often called
the \emph{\emph{inner}} or \emph{\emph{nuclear}} bar. Hereafter, in the context of
this paper, we use the word \emph{\emph{``nuclear''}} for a rapidly rotating
secondary bar extending less than 500~pc across, and reserve the term
\emph{\emph{``inner''}} for larger secondary bars.
\section{Evolution of the central regions}
\label{sec:evol}
In Figs.~\ref{fig:fbfc2} and \ref{fig:abab} we show the face-on
projections of the central region ($2\times 2$~kpc) for the two runs
used throughout this paper. Figure~\ref{fig:fbfc} focuses on the
$1\times 1$~kpc of {\tt SimS}\ during the formation of the nuclear bar.
The stellar mass distribution has been photometrically calibrated
using the technique of \citet{2004A&A...421..863M}. A blue photometric
band (B Cousins) has been chosen to emphasize the regions with
the youngest stellar population. For this purpose, the age of the
initial stellar population has been kept fixed at 10~Gyr for all
snapshots. This implies that a direct photometric comparison of
snapshots has no sense since the initial stellar population is not
getting old and thus its luminosity is not dimming. Because it is a
post-processing technique, this obviously has no impact on the
self-consistent chemodynamical evolution of the simulation.
The two simulations show different histories of star formation
(Fig.~\ref{fig:SFR}). Their dynamical history is obviously different,
the main driver being the dynamical timescale that is roughly doubled
for {\tt SimL}\ with respect to {\tt SimS}.
\begin{figure}
\centering
\includegraphics[keepaspectratio,width=\hsize]{AA_2014_25005-fig1.pdf}
\caption{Star formation rate (SFR) averaged in a sliding window of
10~Myr for runs {\tt SimS}\ (red) and {\tt SimL}\ (black).}
\label{fig:SFR}
\end{figure}
\subsection{Run {\tt SimS}}
\label{ssec:fbfc}
\begin{figure*}
\centering
\includegraphics[keepaspectratio,width=\hsize]{AA_2014_25005-fig2.pdf}
\caption{Run {\tt SimS}: gas mass surface density (left) and B$-$Cousins
surface brightness (right) in the central $\pm 1$~kpc for $t <
0.7$~Gyr. Isocontours are spaced by 0.15 magnitude in $\log
\mathrm{M}_{\sun}\,\mathrm{pc}^{-2}$ for the gas and 0.5
$\mathrm{Bmag}\,\mathrm{pc}^{-2}$ for the stars. The map resolution
is 10~pc. Gas particles have been convolved by the SPH kernel
to obtain the real distribution. Gas surface densities below
1~$\mathrm{M}_{\sun}\,\mathrm{pc}^{-2}$ are contoured with dashed
lines. The straight dotted line is the primary bar position-angle.
}
\label{fig:fbfc}
\end{figure*}
\subsubsection{The nuclear bar formation}
The initial disc quickly develops a typical strong bar and a spiral
structure both in the stellar and the gaseous components. The gravity
torques due to the bar and spiral structure drive the gas inwards and
reorganize the mass distribution even for the old stellar population;
this gas inflow occurs in a rather short timescale since the star
formation rate peaks at $t=0.45$~Gyr (cf. Fig.~\ref{fig:SFR}). As
expected, star formation also occurs along gaseous spiral arms that are not
shown in Figs.~\ref{fig:fbfc} and \ref{fig:fbfc2}.
\begin{figure*}
\centering
\includegraphics[keepaspectratio,width=\hsize]{AA_2014_25005-fig3.pdf}
\caption{As in Fig.~\ref{fig:fbfc}, but for $t > 0.7$~Gyr in the central $\pm
2$~kpc. The map resolution is now 20~pc. Gas isocontours are spaced
by 0.25 magnitude in $\log \mathrm{M}_{\sun}\,\mathrm{pc}^{-2}$.
The radius of ILR$_\mathrm{p}$\ is indicated by dashed white circles.}
\label{fig:fbfc2}
\end{figure*}
>From $t\approx 0.36$~Gyr, the gas distribution in the central 400~pc
(Fig.~\ref{fig:fbfc2}) starts to twist by an increasing angle that
amounts to $\approx 45^\circ$ at $t=0.4$~Gyr. This twist is also
visible in the distribution of the new stellar population. At the
beginning of the twisting process, the new stellar population is
aligned with the gas distribution. Afterwards, the gas twist angle
still increases, quickly reaching $90^\circ$ at $t\approx 0.42$~Gyr,
but not the stellar angle since the collisionless component is less
reactive to the torque induced by the local gravitational potential
twist. Moreover, the stellar mass trapped in that region also
increases as a result of the on-going star formation, thus making the
decoupling of the stellar component easier. When the gas twist angle
continues to increase so that the central gas distribution eventually
realigns with the larger scale flows, the new stellar population is
rather axisymmetric.
At $t\approx 0.5$~Gyr there is, however, as much mass in the new stellar
component as in the gas component. A second episode of twisting then
begins. At $t\approx 0.51$~Gyr, the angular motion of the new stellar
population distribution becomes elongated and definitively
decouples from the gas distribution. For $t\approx 0.52$~Gyr, the central gas
twist is again almost perpendicular to the major-axis large-scale
stellar bar. At that point, one can clearly identify a so-called
nuclear secondary bar whose rotating motion seems independent from
the gas motion.
During this formation phase, the pattern speed of the nuclear bar is
very high, leading to a low rotation period of $T_\mathrm{s}\approx
10$~Myr (Fig.~\ref{fig:FBFC_period}). This value is the dynamical
signature of the gas from which the new stellar population has been
created. The radius of the nuclear bar is then $l_\mathrm{s} \approx
250$~pc, whereas $l_\mathrm{p}\approx 4.55$~kpc, which leads to
$l_\mathrm{s}/l_\mathrm{p} \approx 0.056$.
\begin{figure}
\centering
\includegraphics[keepaspectratio,width=\hsize]{AA_2014_25005-fig4.pdf}
\caption{Period of rotation for the primary bar (in black) and the
nuclear bar (in red) for {\tt SimS}. }
\label{fig:FBFC_period}
\end{figure}
\subsubsection{The nuclear bar evolution}
Once the nuclear bar has been formed and rotates independently of
the gas (what was called ``decoupling'' in some studies from the 1990s), the
central gas concentration quickly gets aligned with the stellar
component. For $t\ga 0.63$~Gyr the gas dynamics can be considered
fully driven by the nuclear bar evolution (orientation, velocity)
since the gas no longer represents the most massive component in that part of
the galaxy. The morphology is modified consequently. Indeed,
the gas distribution is more ring-like around the nuclear bar or
sometimes disc-like, especially when the energy feedback from
SNII temporarily dissolves a part of the gaseous ring.
After 1~Gyr, the total mass inside the central kpc has increased by a
factor of 1.5. Indeed, a nuclear gas disc is formed from the accumulation
of gas in the centre, and new stars are actively formed there. The
first cause of this mass inflow is the overall reorganization of the
mass distribution under the influence of the stellar bar, even the old
population. Owing to gravitational torques exerted on the gas by the
stellar bar, the extra mass in the form of gas and new stars amounts
to $1.97\,10^{9}$~M$_{\sun}$ at $t=1$~Gyr, which is only 31\%\ of the
whole additional mass. The redistribution of the old stellar
population contributes to the other 69\%.
The length of the nuclear bar slowly increases as it slows down. The
large-scale bar also increases, but at a lower rate. Therefore, at $t=2$~Gyr
$l_\mathrm{s} \approx 1$~kpc, $l_\mathrm{p} \approx 5$~kpc so that
$l_\mathrm{s}/l_\mathrm{p} \approx 0.2$.
\subsubsection{The nuclear bar dissolution. Formation of the nuclear disc}
While the nuclear stellar bar continuously grows, the gaseous ring
radius increases. For $t \ga 2$~Gyr the nuclear bar gets also thicker,
looking sometimes like an oval surrounded by a ring of gas. The ring
itself gets broader as the nuclear bar thickens. The nuclear bar is
sometimes slightly off-centred, in particular around $t\approx
1.6$~Gyr, but this is a transient effect.
It is impossible to precisely date the moment when the nuclear bar
can be considered as dissolved because the dissolution process is smooth
and has a long timescale. Except for $t \ga 2.7-3.0$~Gyr, one can
consider that the nuclear bar has been replaced by a nuclear disc.
This stellar nuclear disc has a clear signature in the edge-on mass
distribution. It also drives the shape of the gaseous nuclear
ring. Any slight temporary ovalization of the stellar nuclear disc
leads to an alignment of the major-axis of the gaseous ring.
Since the gas accumulation in the central region continues, whereas
the star formation rate is very low in the ring, the gas mass
increases in the ring and the nucleus. For $t > 4$~Gyr the gaseous
ring becomes unstable. It starts to twist and collapse. This permits
the gas flows to reach the nucleus and leads the star formation rate
to briefly increase (Fig.~\ref{fig:SFR}). As a result, the nice broad
gaseous ring is replaced by a gaseous disc of the same size as the
nuclear disc for $t > 4.3$~Gyr until the end of the simulation.
\subsection{Run {\tt SimL}}
\label{ssec:abab}
\begin{figure*}
\centering
\includegraphics[keepaspectratio,width=0.95\hsize]{AA_2014_25005-fig5.pdf}
\caption{As in Fig.~\ref{fig:fbfc2}, but for {\tt SimL}. From $t=6535$~Myr
the dashed white circle represents ILR$_\mathrm{s}$\ instead of ILR$_\mathrm{p}$\ which is
outside the field of view. }
\label{fig:abab}
\end{figure*}
\subsubsection{The nuclear bar formation: the first secondary bar}
As for {\tt SimS}, the initial disc of {\tt SimL}\ develops a typical large-scale strong
bar and spiral structure. However, because the disc scalelength of
{\tt SimL}\ is roughly twice that of {\tt SimS}, the dynamical timescale for
the development of the main stellar bar is significantly greater. It
is only after $t\approx 0.8$~Gyr that the new stellar population
created in the central gas concentration forms a nuclear bar-like
structure (Fig.~\ref{fig:abab}). This nuclear structure is very small,
$l_\mathrm{s} \approx 250$~pc, whereas $l_\mathrm{p}\approx 5$~kpc,
which leads to $l_\mathrm{s}/l_\mathrm{p} = 0.05$. It is also
transient, lasting less than $\approx 0.6$~Gyr, and is often asymmetric
and/or off-centred. It then dissolves into a stellar nuclear spiral
structure surrounded by a circumnuclear gaseous ring. It must
be also mentioned that the large-scale bar growth is not completed yet.
However, even if the length of both bars increases during this phase,
the ratio $l_\mathrm{s}/l_\mathrm{p}$ remains approximately
constant. For instance, at $t\approx 1.3$~Gyr,
$l_\mathrm{s}/l_\mathrm{p}\approx 0.3/6.0 = 0.05$.
Because of its time dependent morphology, the pattern speed of this
nuclear structure is difficult to measure precisely. The pattern
rotation period of the large-scale bar and the nuclear structure are
shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:ABAB_period}. It was not possible to
determine properly the nuclear rotation period for the whole lifetime
because of the quick changes in morphology. However, the nuclear
structure has a very short rotation period (between 10 and 30 Myr)
that strongly contrasts with the primary bar rotation period; it is at least ten times
longer. During the lifetime of the nuclear structure, the large-scale
bar temporarily slows down, the rotation period increasing from
200~Myr to 300~Myr (Fig.~\ref{fig:ABAB_period}).
\begin{figure}
\centering
\includegraphics[keepaspectratio,width=\hsize]{AA_2014_25005-fig6.pdf}
\caption{As in Fig.~\ref{fig:FBFC_period} for {\tt SimL}.}
\label{fig:ABAB_period}
\end{figure}
When the nuclear structure dissolves, both a gaseous disc and a
stellar disc (mainly made of new stellar population), surrounded by a
ring-like structure, survive. These discs form the remnant of the
nuclear bar. The size of both gaseous and stellar discs increases
to $\approx 1.8$~kpc in diameter, which leads to
$l_\mathrm{s}/l_\mathrm{p}\approx 0.9/8 =0.11$. However, because the remnant
stellar disc is no longer barred, $l_\mathrm{s}/l_\mathrm{p}$ has
another meaning here. Transient gaseous and/or stellar spiral arms
often appear inside and outside the ring-like structure until
$t\approx 2.6$~Gyr.
\subsubsection{The inner bar formation: the second secondary bar}
After $t\approx 2.6$~Gyr, the inner region returns to a bar-like
shape. The pattern speed can be determined much more precisely now than
for the first nuclear bar. The gaseous and stellar components both
display the same features. The inner bar ends in a broad circumnuclear
ring. In the centre, the remnant of the first nuclear bar settles in
the centre as a flattened small bulge. As the stellar inner bar
begins to turn into an oval, the gaseous counterpart progressively
dissolves. Only a gaseous circumnuclear ring survives, that gradually
gets broader (up to roughly 500~pc across the torus).
For $t\ga 4$~Gyr, it becomes difficult to unambiguously determine a
nuclear bar structure. The central kpc region looks like the triaxial
pseudobulges described by \citet{2004ARA&A..42..603K}. However,
even if the contrast between the inner structure and the old stellar
population background is too low to permit a proper pattern speed
determination, the inner region is not devoid of
non-axisymmetries. Therefore, for $t \ga 4.5$~Gyr, the whole inner
stellar structure, including the now vanishing circumnuclear ring,
turns into a strong oval that looks like a $l_\mathrm{s}=2.2$~kpc long
bar ($l_\mathrm{s}/l_\mathrm{p}\approx 0.275$). The shape of this
second (in the time sequence) inner bar depends strongly on its
relative orientation with respect to the large-scale bar. The
higher axis ratio is obtained when the angle between the two bars
reaches 90\degr. When the two bars are aligned, the axis ratio is
roughly halved.
For $t\ga 4.5$~Gyr, the responsive gaseous ring also starts to turn
into an oval, meaning that the gas ring shrinks and expands depending
on the relative orientation of the inner bar with respect to the
large-scale bar. The ring progressively dissolves into a disc that
closely follows the same changes in morphology as the stellar
nuclear bar and thus shares the same orientation.
Because star formation, which mainly occurs in the central region, consumes
the gas, the nuclear disc size significantly decreases for $t \ga
6$~Gyr and becomes dynamically unstable. For $6 < t < 7$~Gyr,
the star formation rate temporarily increases
(Fig.~\ref{fig:SFR}) because of the collapse of the gaseous
nuclear ring. This is the last episode of star formation in that
region. At $t\approx 7$~Gyr, the gaseous nuclear disc has almost fully
disappeared, whereas the stellar counterpart is made of an inner bar
with $l_\mathrm{s}\approx 1.3$~kpc embedded in a slightly larger
stellar disc. The large-scale bar has $l_\mathrm{p}=8.5$~kpc leading
to $l_\mathrm{s}/l_\mathrm{p}\approx 0.15$.
As the stellar inner bar (oval-like) still exists for $t > 7$~Gyr, the
gas inflow continues in such a way that a gaseous circumnuclear ring
forms again. The gas mass surface density in the ring, and in the
region encircled by the ring, is higher than 1~M$_{\sun}\ \mbox{pc}^{-2}$\ , but never
reaches the same high values as during the first 2~Gyr. In
particular, the gas distribution is smoother.
These structures, the inner stellar bar or oval and gaseous circumnuclear
ring, last until the end of the simulation at $t\approx 9.5$~Gyr
without any significant morphological change. The only noticeable fact
is the permanent slow down of both bars due to the classical angular
momentum exchange with the large-scale disc.
At the end of the simulation, $l_\mathrm{s}/l_\mathrm{p}\approx 1.5/9
= 0.17$, quite close to the value at $t=7$~Gyr. Indeed, the two bars
slow down, but at different rates.
\section{Comparison with observations}
\label{sec:comparison}
\subsection{Gas mass in the central kpc}
\label{ssec:gasmass}
It has been argued in the past \citep[][and references
therein]{2004ApJ...603..495P} that large amounts of gas are not
required to form and sustain a double-bar. However, if the nuclear bar
is long-lived, and we can imagine that the galaxy has been gas rich in the
past, then its gas has been consumed and possibly redistributed
thus explaining the current low content. Alternatively, if the nuclear
bar is a short-lived phenomenon, one has to define the lower gas mass
limit to initiate the formation process.
This means that the expressions `gas rich' or `gas poor' used in the
literature must be clarified.
The last development stage (i.e. after 7~Gyr) of {\tt SimL}\ is
morphologically close to SB0 galaxies, and so it is morphologically
comparable to the \citet{2004ApJ...603..495P} observations. We can thus
determine the amount of gas in a region of similar surface limited by
the beam size. For ten objects, the radius encircling the mass that
has been measured ranges from 0.3 kpc to 2.6 kpc, but for their SB0
subsample (NGC\,2859, NGC\,2950, NGC\,3081, NGC\,4340, and NGC\,4371)
$r < 1$~kpc and $r < 2.3$~kpc are more representative. For $r <
1$~kpc, observational gas mass upper limits range from 1.5\,10$^7$ to
8.1\,10$^7$ M$_{\sun}$\ , whereas it amounts to 4.4\,10$^7$~M$_{\sun}$\ for
{\tt SimL}. For $r < 2.3$~kpc it increases to 2.8\,10$^8$~M$_{\sun}$\ for our
simulation, whereas for NGC\,3081 the gas mass amounts to 6.2 or
6.5\,10$^8$~M$_{\sun}$. Since our simulation is not fine tuned to fit any
particular galaxy, we can conclude that {\tt SimL}\ is well within the
observational constraints. A value of 4.4\,10$^7$~M$_{\sun}$\ is low enough to
explain why \citet{2004ApJ...603..495P} were unable to detect
molecular gas in NGC\,2859, NGC\,4340, and NGC\,4371, but obviously one
cannot conclude that the gas component do not play a role in the
formation of nuclear bars.
\subsection{Stellar population in nuclear bars}
\label{ssec:stellarpop}
Studying the stellar populations of double-barred galaxies NGC\,2859,
NGC\,3941, NGC\,4725, and NGC\,5850, \citet{2013MNRAS.431.2397D} have
recently concluded that the inner bars are younger and more metal rich
than the large-scale primary bars. It has been argued
\citep{2007A&A...465L...1W} that the stellar age distribution in bars
has to be interpreted with a dynamical approach. For instance, two
regions of apparent low age at the end of the large-scale bars
\citep{2007A&A...465L...9P} are due to the accumulation of a composite
stellar population, younger in average and
trapped in orbits shaped
like an ellipse in average, aligned with the bar.
To make a comparison with \citet{2013MNRAS.431.2397D}, a mean age
profile has been computed as the average of individual particle age in
annuli 100~pc wide and $\pm 100$~pc thick centred on the
nucleus. Being an azimuthal average approach, each annulus mixes the
population inside and outside the structures (inner and outer bars,
circumnuclear ring). Moreover, all particles of the initial
population arbitrarily have the same age (0 at the beginning of the
simulation) so that snapshot time is also the age of the initial
population.
\begin{figure}
\centering
\includegraphics[keepaspectratio,width=\hsize]{AA_2014_25005-fig7.pdf}
\caption{Radial profile of the age difference with the time of the
snapshot ($t = 9.486$~Gyr) for {\tt SimL}. The mean age has been computed
in concentric annuli of 100~pc wide. For the sake of comparison, the
radius of the NGC\,5850 inner bar and the limit of age measurement
\citep{2013MNRAS.431.2397D} have been scaled to {\tt SimL}\ and
overplotted as dashed and dot-dashed lines, respectively.}
\label{fig:periodage}
\end{figure}
In Fig.~\ref{fig:periodage} we show the relative mean age of the
particle population at $t = 9.486$~Gyr. The region inside the nuclear
bar is 2.5$-$3.0~Gyr younger than the large-scale bar. Because of the
mixing with older regions outside the inner bar, and the rough
assumption that all initial particles have an age of 9.486~Gyr, this value is
certainly a lower limit. The outermost region of the large-scale bar
is also younger. This effect is obviouly that discovered by
\citet{2007A&A...465L...9P} and explained by
\citet{2007A&A...465L...1W}.
Even if a direct and quantitative comparison with
\citet{2013MNRAS.431.2397D} is not possible because the averaging
technique is different (they measured ages along ellipses fitted on
the isochrone maps), the results are in good qualitative agreement. In
particular, the age difference for NGC\,5850 amounts to $\approx
4$~Gyr between the nuclear bar and the outermost measurements. To
help the comparison, the large-scale bar radius of NGC\,5850 (using
the \citet{2013MNRAS.431.2397D} value, i.e. 63\arcsec) has been
scaled to {\tt SimL}\ ($l_\mathrm{p} \approx 9$~kpc). The large-scale bar
radius was used as its determination is much more accurate than
the nuclear radius. In Fig.~\ref{fig:periodage} the outermost limit of
age measurement by \citet{2013MNRAS.431.2397D} is also plotted showing
that their age measurements might be well inside the large-scale bar.
\subsection{Pattern speeds}
\label{ssec:pattern}
The ratio of pattern speeds ($\Omega_\mathrm{p}$/$\Omega_\mathrm{s}$\ or equivalently $T_\mathrm{s}$/$T_\mathrm{p}$,
cf. Fig~\ref{fig:period_ratio}) is not constant over time. For the two
simulations, both $\Omega_\mathrm{p}$\ and $\Omega_\mathrm{s}$\ decrease as a function of
time (Figs.~\ref{fig:FBFC_period} and \ref{fig:ABAB_period}) but are
not locked into a particular ratio. The slopes seem different between
{\tt SimS}\ and {\tt SimL}, but are in fact consistent with a factor of
roughly two in dynamical timescales. This means that the ratio is the
same for {\tt SimL}\ after twice the time needed by {\tt SimS}. Because on average
$\Omega_\mathrm{s}$\ decreases much faster than $\Omega_\mathrm{p}$, the ratio
$\Omega_\mathrm{p}$/$\Omega_\mathrm{s}$\ monotonically increases up to $\approx
0.21-0.25$. Only a change in the slope and a lower dispersion between
6 and 8~Gyr are notable for {\tt SimL}, mainly due to $\Omega_\mathrm{s}$\ variations
during the circumnuclear ring collapse (cf. Sect~\ref{ssec:abab}).
The fluctuations of the ratio is due to oscillations of $\Omega_\mathrm{s}$\ and
$\Omega_\mathrm{p}$\ (Figs.~\ref{fig:FBFC_period} and \ref{fig:ABAB_period}) that
depend on the relative phase of the two bars, a fact already observed
by \citet{2004ApJ...617L.115E} and \cite{2007ApJ...654L.127D}.
\begin{figure}
\centering
\includegraphics[keepaspectratio,width=\hsize]{AA_2014_25005-fig8.pdf}
\caption{Ratio of the primary to secondary bar pattern speed. Black
dots are for {\tt SimL}, red dots for {\tt SimS}.}
\label{fig:period_ratio}
\end{figure}
The best model of \citet{1993A&A...277...27F} has $\Omega_p/\Omega_s
\approx 0.32$, and $0.3$ for \citet{2004ApJ...617L.115E}, values that
our simulations never reach. Our values of $\Omega_\mathrm{p}$\ and $\Omega_\mathrm{s}$\ are
comparable, however, to the few measurements in double-barred galaxies.
Most observational methods to directly estimate $\Omega_p$ cannot be
easily applied to $\Omega_s$ and, more generally, are not suited when
multiple patterns are present
\citep{2006MNRAS.371..451M,2009ApJ...690..758S}. However, keeping in mind the
questionable viability of $\Omega_s$ measurement, we must rely
on available attempts.
Therefore, if we assume two bars in NGC\,5248 \citep[cf. discussion
in][]{2013A&A...556A..98V},
$\Omega_\mathrm{p}$$\,=30$~km$\,$s$^{-1}$\,kpc$^{-1}$\ \citep{2002ApJ...575..156J} and
$\Omega_\mathrm{s}$$\ga 135$~km$\,$s$^{-1}$\,kpc$^{-1}$\ leading to a ratio $\Omega_\mathrm{p}$/$\Omega_\mathrm{s}$~$\la
0.23$. \citet{2003ApJ...599L..29C} found a value as low as 0.13 for
NGC\,2950 using the Tremaine-Weinberg method \citep[but
see][]{2006MNRAS.371..451M,2009ApJ...690..758S}.
\citet{2005ApJ...632..253H} and \citet{2009ApJ...704.1657F} applied
the same technique to H$\alpha$ velocity fields to determine pattern
speeds and found $0.3 < \Omega_p/\Omega_s < 0.55,$ but with large error
bars on $\Omega_\mathrm{s}$. An in-depth analysis of NGC\,1068, based both on
multiwavelength observations and numerical simulations, led
\citet{2006MNRAS.365..367E} to conclude that $0.19 \la
\Omega_p/\Omega_s \la 0.26$.
\citet{2007AJ....133.2584Z} introduced a potential-density phase-shift
method that is able to determine the position of multiple corotations
in a galaxy without any kinematical information. This method is thus
particularly well suited to double-barred galaxies. Moreover, it is
based on the properties of quasi-stationary density wave
modes. \citet{2007AJ....133.2584Z} did not publish values for
$\Omega_p$ and $\Omega_s$, but only radii for CR$_\mathrm{s}$\ and CR$_\mathrm{p}$. However,
the ratio of corotation radii CR$_\mathrm{s}$/CR$_\mathrm{p}$\ can be used as it evolves
like $\Omega_p/\Omega_s$. For their small sample (seven objects), they
found ratios between 0.086 (NGC\,1530) and 0.3 (NGC\,936) and a mean
of $\approx 0.17$. For {\tt SimS}\ and {\tt SimL}, CR$_\mathrm{s}$/CR$_\mathrm{p}$\ starts at $\approx
0.03$ when a nuclear bar is just detected for the first time and then
increases to respectively $\approx 0.24$ and $0.30$. Our values are
thus comparable even for SB0 galaxies.
The most recent survey \citep{2014MNRAS.444L..85F} of pattern speeds
in double-barred galaxies, using a phase reversal technique in
H$\alpha$ kinematical maps \citep{2014ApJS..210....2F} found a narrow
range of ratios $0.29^{+0.05}_{-0.05}$, a bit higher than our end
values. However, \citet{2014MNRAS.444L..85F} have introduced an
important assumption: the nuclear bar ends near its corotation (CR$_\mathrm{s}$)
which in turn overlaps (or is close to) the primary bar ILR
(ILR$_\mathrm{p}$). If this new technique could be useful to determine
the location of resonances (although a firm physical foundation must be found), it gives no information on the type of these resonances, especially the main ones, ILR, ultraharmonic (UHR, also called 4:1), CR, and OLR. Therefore, the
identification of the resonance needs to assume that any bar ends
inside and close to its corotation. Whereas this is reasonable true
for the primary bars (although it has been argued by
\citet{2006A&A...452...97M} that typical observational bar length
measurement techniques are more correlated with the UHR resonance than with the CR), this assumption is questionable for
nuclear bars. Indeed, if CR$_\mathrm{s}$\ is determined in {\tt SimL}\ as being the
end of the nuclear bar, and moreover identical to ILR$_\mathrm{p}$, this leads to
a large underestimation of $\Omega_\mathrm{s}$. For the sake of illustration,
we consider the moment $t=7.5$~Gyr. At this time, $R_\mathrm{ILRp}
\approx 4.84$~kpc and $\Omega_p\approx 15$~km$\,$s$^{-1}$\,kpc$^{-1}$. If we assume
that this radius is identical to the corotation radius of the nuclear
bar, this leads to $\Omega_s\approx 45$~km$\,$s$^{-1}$\,kpc$^{-1}$\ instead of
$\approx 73$~km$\,$s$^{-1}$\,kpc$^{-1}$\ (see also Fig.~\ref{fig:fft} in the next
section). Therefore, the ratio $\Omega_\mathrm{p}$/$\Omega_\mathrm{s}$\ might be spuriously
estimated to be 0.33, a value which appears to be in good agreement
with \citet{2014MNRAS.444L..85F}, instead of $\approx 0.2$, its
\emph{\emph{real}} value.
\subsection{Bar lengths}
\label{ssec:shape}
The absolute sizes of simulated secondary bars fit quite well with the
values given by \citet{2011MSAIS..18..145E}. Erwin showed that
$l_\mathrm{s}/l_\mathrm{p}$, the secondary over primary bar lengths,
ranges from 0.025 to 0.25 with a median of $\approx 0.12$. For the
first nuclear bar of {\tt SimL}, $l_\mathrm{s}/l_\mathrm{p}$ remains
roughly constant at 0.05. It is only when the nuclear bar has been
fully dissolved that this ratio reaches 0.11 (this is then the size of
the remnant nuclear disc relative to the large-scale bar). The inner
bar restarts with a rather high ratio (0.275 at $t\approx 4.5$~Gyr),
but then decreases to 0.15-0.19. However, the observational relative
size distribution does not show any strong evidence of two different
kinds of secondary bars that could help to distinguish the first
generation from the subsequent ones. Our simulations should also
show some similarities with that of \citet{1993A&A...277...27F} since our
recipes are quite similar, although our initial conditions are
different. Indeed, the basic process leading to the formation of a
nuclear bar is the same. However, their best model has a bar length
ratio of $0.26$.
Although it is incorrect to base an argument on absolute sizes,
it is also
noteworthy that, all other factors being equal, if primary bars have
low $\Omega_\mathrm{p}$\ (as for {\tt SimL}), they are longer than bars
with high $\Omega_\mathrm{p}$\ (as for {\tt SimS}), assuming here that they
systematically fill the region inside their corotation radius.
\citet{2011MSAIS..18..145E} emphasizes that the sizes of large-scale
bars are longer in double-barred galaxies than in single-barred ones
whereas all the other properties are similar.
\section{Discussion}
\label{sec:discussion}
{\tt SimS}\ and {\tt SimL}\ having morphological, kinematical and stellar
population properties similar to real galaxies, we can now discuss
their dynamical structure and long-term evolution.
\subsection{Resonance overlap or not?}
\label{ssec:mode}
In the framework of the
epicyclic approximation, we solved the equations $\Omega-\kappa/n
= \Omega_{p,s}$ for the resonance radii (ILR$_\mathrm{p}$\ and ILR$_\mathrm{s}$\ for
$n=2$, UHR$_\mathrm{p}$\ and UHR$_\mathrm{s}$\ for $n=4$, CR$_\mathrm{p}$\ and CR$_\mathrm{s}$\ for $n=\infty$,
OLR$_\mathrm{p}$\ and OLR$_\mathrm{s}$\ for $n=-2$). \citet{1992MNRAS.259..328A} and
\citet{2006A&A...452...97M} have shown that, even in the case of
strong bars for which the epicyclic approximation breaks down, the
errors on the resonance positions remain within 10\%, especially in
the case of the ILR and the CR. In Fig.~\ref{fig:pos_resonance} we
show the evolution of ILR, UHR, CR, and OLR as a function of
time. Since most of the time two ILRs exist, hereafter we only deal with the
outermost one (named oILR by most authors). Moreover, because it is very
close to the centre in the case of {\tt SimS}, the position of ILR$_\mathrm{s}$\ is
not always reliable for $t\la 2$~Gyr.
\begin{figure}
\centering
\includegraphics[keepaspectratio,width=\hsize]{AA_2014_25005-fig9-top.pdf}
\includegraphics[keepaspectratio,width=\hsize]{AA_2014_25005-fig9-bottom.pdf}
\caption{Radius of the linear resonances (ILR, UHR, CR, OLR) for the
secondary bar (subscript 's', red triangles) and the primary bar ('p', black
dots) in the simulations {\tt SimS}\ (top) and {\tt SimL}\ (bottom). OLR$_\mathrm{p}$\ is
not shown. }
\label{fig:pos_resonance}
\end{figure}
The immediate observation is that the whole resonance system of the
inner bar, up to OLR$_\mathrm{s}$, remains well inside the ILR$_\mathrm{p}$\ for a long time
(roughly 2~Gyr for {\tt SimS}\ and 8~Gyr for {\tt SimL}). Therefore, there is no
CR$_\mathrm{s}$--ILR$_\mathrm{p}$\ overlap, unlike \citet{1993A&A...277...27F} and many
other similar studies that followed.
However, such a situation is not new
as a few examples have been already reported by
\citet{1999A&A...348..737R} and \citet{2000A&A...362..465R}, but with
different experimental setups (either 2D simulations or an analytical
bulge component). Moreover, \citet{1995A&A...301..359M} reported
evidence of an OLR$_\mathrm{s}$--ILR$_\mathrm{p}$\ coupling in the case of NGC\,4736, before
the paradigm of CR$_\mathrm{s}$--ILR$_\mathrm{p}$\ coupling was firmly established. They
claimed this configuration could weaken the interaction and increase
the lifetime of the nuclear bar.
To further investigate the dynamical impact of possible resonance
overlaps, we have built spectrograms, as introduced by
\citet{1986MNRAS.221..195S} and widely used \citep[see e.g.][and
references therein]{2011MNRAS.417..762Q}. We note $m$ the
azimuthal wavenumber of a wave of frequency $\omega$. Spectrograms
can be used to determine the pattern speed $\Omega$ of any wave as being
$\Omega = \omega/m$ and helps to identify any potential non-linear
mode coupling when resonances overlap. As discussed by
\citet{1999A&A...348..737R} and \citet{2011MNRAS.417..762Q},
spectrograms show many small features, often transient, probably
linked to the main modes. Some of these features with a well-defined
pattern speed can be beat modes triggered by the non-linear couplings
of other waves at the location of resonance
overlaps. \citet{1999A&A...348..737R} found many kinds of resonance
overlaps in addition to the classical CR$_\mathrm{s}$--ILR$_\mathrm{p}$, although they were not
always able to determine whether these couplings were stationary or
accidental.
Figure~\ref{fig:fft} shows spectrograms for $m=2$, centred at $t=3$ and
$7.5$~Gyr for {\tt SimL}\ and computed in a window of 269~Myr corresponding
to 256 outputs. To compute the spectra we included only the
stellar component to extract the information on stellar modes. Similar
spectrograms have been obtained for {\tt SimS}. Spectra with greater
wavenumbers ($m \ge 4$) confirm what can be inferred from $m=2$, in
particular the presence of harmonics of the large-scale bar mode. They
are not shown here. For the two moments shown in
Fig.~\ref{fig:fft} representative of the rest of the simulations, the
two dominant modes correspond to the secondary and primary bars, with
pattern speed values in good agreement with all other measurements
(cf. Sect.~\ref{sec:model}). The features are not as thin as for
\citet{1997A&A...322..442M}. This is due in part to our narrower time
window. This also shows that these features do not correspond to
quasi-stationary structures.
\begin{figure}
\centering
\includegraphics[keepaspectratio,width=\hsize]{AA_2014_25005-fig10-top.pdf}
\includegraphics[keepaspectratio,width=\hsize]{AA_2014_25005-fig10-bottom.pdf}
\caption{$m=2$ power spectra for {\tt SimL}\ in $\log$ scale. The time
window spans 269~Myr centred at $t=3.3$ and $t=7.5$~Gyr. The left
vertical scale gives values of $\omega$, the wave frequency in
Myr$^{-1}$, whereas the right vertical scale is for the pattern
speed $\Omega=\omega/2$ in km$\,$s$^{-1}$\,kpc$^{-1}$. The horizontal white lines
represent $\Omega_\mathrm{s}$\ and $\Omega_\mathrm{p}$, respectively, at the beginning of the
time window (full line) and the end (dot-dashed
one). $\Omega_\mathrm{s}$\ decreases from 146 to 139 at $t=3.3$~Gyr and from 81
to 71~km$\,$s$^{-1}$\,kpc$^{-1}$\ at $t=7.5$~Gyr, whereas $\Omega_\mathrm{p}$\ decreases by
less than 1~km$\,$s$^{-1}$\,kpc$^{-1}$\ so that the two lines cannot be
distinguished. The averaged curves $2\Omega -\kappa$ (which allows
the ILR to be identified) and $2\Omega +\kappa$ (for the OLR) are drawn
as white short dashed lines, $2\Omega -\kappa/2$ (for the UHR) as
long dashed line, and $2\Omega$ as a solid line (for the CR). A
logarithmic scale has been chosen for the radius to emphasize
the central kpc. }
\label{fig:fft}
\end{figure}
Figure~\ref{fig:fft} clearly shows that most of the power of the nuclear
bar mode remains inside the UHR$_\mathrm{s}$. For the large-scale primary bar, it
has been argued that the most appropriate orbits to sustain a bar are
those existing inside the UHR \citep[see e.g. Sect.~6.1~of][
and reference therein]{2006A&A...452...97M}. This also seems to be
true for the secondary bars of {\tt SimL}\ and {\tt SimS}. This additionally
supports our previous claim (Sect.~\ref{ssec:pattern}) that one cannot
systematically assume that the morphological end of a nuclear bar
coincides with CR$_\mathrm{s}$.
Finally, whatever the approach, the linear resonance analysis or the
mode analysis both lead to the same conclusion: there is no resonance
overlap or mode coupling in {\tt SimL}\ and {\tt SimS}.
\subsection{Double-bar lifetime}
\label{ssec:lifetime}
\citet{2002MNRAS.337.1233R} reported the case of a long-lived double-barred
system (their {\tt model I}) which could be very similar to
{\tt SimL}, although {\tt SimL}\ is 3D and fully self-consistent whereas their
{\tt model I} is 2D and the bulge is represented by an analytical Plummer
sphere. However, the fact that long-lived systems can exist is
important in order to explain the high frequency of double-barred galaxies. In
our case, the nuclear bar lifetime is clearly linked to the lifetime
of the central bar mode. The fact that we are not able to
determine a proper pattern speed during roughly 1~Gyr centred on
$t\approx 2$ and 4~Gyr (cf. Fig.~\ref{fig:abab}) does not mean that
\emph{dynamically} the nuclear mode has disappeared. Indeed, the mode
still exists (Fig.~\ref{fig:fft2}) at a pattern speed of respectively
$\approx 215$ and 125~km$\,$s$^{-1}$\,kpc$^{-1}$. This means that even if, on
photometrical grounds, it can be stated that the nuclear bar has been
dissolved into a triaxial bulge or pseudobulge
\citep{2004ARA&A..42..603K}, or even a weaker structure like nuclear
spirals (cf.~Sect.~\ref{sec:evol}), the bar mode does survive, which in
turn facilitates the morphological revival of the nuclear bar later on.
\citet{2007ApJ...654L.127D} also reported long-lived double-barred
systems in purely collisionless simulations. A direct comparison is
not possible since the initial conditions of their
simulations, especially the bulge part, were fine-tuned to produce
such gas-free double-barred galaxies. However, their enforced rotating
bulge mimics perfectly the effect of a dissolved or weak first nuclear
bar.
\begin{figure}
\centering
\includegraphics[keepaspectratio,width=\hsize]{AA_2014_25005-fig11-top.pdf}
\includegraphics[keepaspectratio,width=\hsize]{AA_2014_25005-fig11-bottom.pdf}
\caption{$m=2$ power spectra for {\tt SimL}\ centred at $t=2$ (top panel)
and $t=4.275$~Gyr (bottom) in a window of 538~Myr, whereas the inner
bar cannot be detected on density maps. Consequently,
$\Omega_\mathrm{s}$\ cannot be measured because the position-angle of the central
structure cannot be properly determined. }
\label{fig:fft2}
\end{figure}
Another crucial dynamical feature of our models that could play an
important role in the lifetime of the secondary bar, is the absence of
any overlap of resonances for a long time. Indeed, the whole nuclear
dynamical system evolves as if embedded in a quasi-stationary
gravitational background due to the rest of the galaxy. The mass (both
gas and stars) encircled by the OLR$_\mathrm{s}$\ is so large that the two
dynamical systems are unable to couple together through their
resonances. For {\tt SimL}, almost 38~\%\ of the total mass of the galaxy
lie inside $R \la 5$~kpc at $t=7$~Gyr.
All previous works that have looked for mode coupling in 3D
self-consistent N$-$body/hydrodynamical simulations have found an
CR$_\mathrm{s}$--ILR$_\mathrm{p}$\ overlap whereas their double-barred systems were
short-lived \citep[e.g.][]{1993A&A...277...27F}. One noticeable
exception is \citet{2002MNRAS.337.1233R} who argue that this mode
coupling is not necessary for the coexistence of bars and show
examples of other kinds of coupling. \citet{2000A&A...362..465R},
using 2D N$-$body simulations and inelastically colliding massless gas
particles, exhibit an example very close to {\tt SimL}\ with OLR$_\mathrm{s}$\ well
inside ILR$_\mathrm{p}$\ (their {\tt model A2.5}). This is the situation of {\tt SimS}\ for $t\la
2$~Gyr and {\tt SimL}\ for $t\la 8$~Gyr. However, their model develops a
very weak primary bar (more oval than {\tt SimL}) and the $m=2$ of the
nuclear mode remains close to the maximum of $\Omega-\kappa/2$ all
through the simulation, which is not the case of our simulations.
Can we infer a strong dynamical perturbation when OLR$_\mathrm{s}$\ position
comes close to ILR$_\mathrm{p}$\ and eventually overlaps with ILR$_\mathrm{p}$? For {\tt SimS}, less
than 1~Gyr after OLR$_\mathrm{s}$\ intersects ILR$_\mathrm{p}$, the nuclear bar is
transformed into a disc with a very time-dependent shape. It is
also remarkable that the nuclear bar then starts to dissolve in
the case of {\tt SimS}\ whereas it continues to evolve as a large oval for
{\tt SimL}, showing larger fluctuations in $\Omega_\mathrm{s}$. Three spectrograms centred at
$t=2, 3.4,$ and $5.47$~Gyr for {\tt SimS}\ (Fig.~\ref{fig:fft3}) show that the nuclear
bar mode progressively vanishes whereas the large-scale bar mode (with
a lower pattern speed) expands toward the centre. However, the
OLR$_\mathrm{s}$\--ILR$_\mathrm{p}$\ overlap seems to play no role. Indeed, the primary
bar mode is at a maximum just inside ILR$_\mathrm{s}$\ , but we have not found a mode
associated with the nuclear bar that might be present near the
OLR$_\mathrm{s}$\ to explain the energy and angular momentum exchanges. The
overlap thus seems neutral and the nuclear bar mode extinction could
simply be due to classical Landau damping at ILR$_\mathrm{s}$.
\begin{figure}
\centering
\includegraphics[keepaspectratio,width=\hsize]{AA_2014_25005-fig12-top.pdf}
\includegraphics[keepaspectratio,width=\hsize]{AA_2014_25005-fig12-middle.pdf}
\includegraphics[keepaspectratio,width=\hsize]{AA_2014_25005-fig12-bottom.pdf}
\caption{$m=2$ power spectra for {\tt SimS}\ centred at $t=2$ (top panel), when
OLR$_\mathrm{s}$\ intersects ILR$_\mathrm{p}$, $t=3.4$ (middle), and $t=5.47$~Gyr (bottom)
where the nuclear bar is dissolved. For $t=2$~Gyr the time window
has been halved (269~Myr) because $\Omega_\mathrm{s}$\ evolves rapidly.}
\label{fig:fft3}
\end{figure}
In the case of {\tt SimL}, the shape of the inner bar is oval for
$t\ga 7$~Gyr. Looking at the spectrograms (Fig.~\ref{fig:fft3b}) for
$t=7.6$ and 9.2~Gyr, it appears that the power of the inner bar mode
is concentrated just outside ILR$_\mathrm{s}$\ whereas the maximum power of the
primary bar is just inside ILR$_\mathrm{p}$, as it is for {\tt SimS}. Again, it is hard to
find any mode between CR$_\mathrm{s}$\ and OLR$_\mathrm{s}$. Unlike {\tt SimS}, several modes can
be detected at low level with $\Omega_p < \Omega < \Omega_s$ or
$\Omega > \Omega_s$, but only inside a region limited by
$\Omega(r)$. As we do for {\tt SimS}, we can suspect Landau damping at ILR$_\mathrm{s}$\ to
be responsible for the inner bar mode decrease.
\begin{figure}
\centering
\includegraphics[keepaspectratio,width=\hsize]{AA_2014_25005-fig13-top.pdf}
\includegraphics[keepaspectratio,width=\hsize]{AA_2014_25005-fig13-bottom.pdf}
\caption{$m=2$ power spectra for {\tt SimL}\ centred at $t=7.6$ (top panel)
just before OLR$_\mathrm{s}$\ intersects ILR$_\mathrm{p}$, $t=9.2$~Gyr (bottom) whereas
the nuclear bar has been replaced by a large rotation oval. The time
windows is 568~Myr wide.}
\label{fig:fft3b}
\end{figure}
\subsection{What makes double-bars long-lived?}
\label{ssec:mecanism}
The lack of mode coupling is a major difference with previous
simulations. For pure N$-$body simulations, but also for models with
massless gas particles, this situation would prevent the nuclear bar
from being long-lived. Indeed, apart form the swing amplification at
corotation that does not operate here, there is no mechanism to bring
energy to the inner bar wave. Therefore, this wave should vanish by
Landau damping at ILR$_\mathrm{s}$.
In our simulations, the first difference is the presence of a
self-gravitating gas component. This component behaves differently
from the stellar component because of its dissipative nature. However, as
shown for example by \citet{1993A&A...277...27F}, the gas does
not help to sustain a long-lived nuclear bar because the mass accumulation
close to the centre reinforces ILR$_\mathrm{p}$\ , which in turn destabilizes the
nuclear bar orbits.
Another major difference is the star formation process that creates a
stellar population with initial dynamical properties inherited from
their parent gas elements (SPH particles). During the first Gyrs, when
the secondary bar grows, gas inflow and star formation are responsible
for bringing energy to the inner waves. When the central star
formation fades out as the mass of gas inflowing in the central region
decreases, the energy dissipation at ILR$_\mathrm{s}$\ prevails. This is
basically the scenario of {\tt SimS}\ for $t \ga 2$~Gyr. What delays the
inner bar extinction in {\tt SimL}\ is a sustained local star formation
rate for several Gyr (cf. Fig.~\ref{fig:SFR}). In the same way as for sustaining the
$\sigma-$drop phenomenon \citep{2006MNRAS.369..853W}, the regular
feeding of the central region with recent stellar populations enables
secondary bars to be long-lived. Simulations by
\citet{1993A&A...277...27F} did not take star formation into account,
leading to the extinction of the secondary bar in roughly 5
turns. This is also the case of other past simulations with a gaseous
component that have been discussed before. A noticeable exception is
\citet{1996A&AS..118..461F} who ran a simulation with star formation,
but only on a short timescale (less than 2~Gyr).
\begin{figure}
\centering
\includegraphics[keepaspectratio,width=\hsize]{AA_2014_25005-fig14-top.pdf}
\includegraphics[keepaspectratio,width=\hsize]{AA_2014_25005-fig14-bottom.pdf}
\caption{Top and middle panels: as for Fig.~\ref{fig:abab} at
$t=7.6$~Gyr, with ({\tt SimL}, top) and without ({\tt SimL$^\mathtt{nosf}$}, middle) star
formation. The surface brightness ranges from 22.8 to 17
$\mathrm{Bmag}\,\mathrm{pc}^{-2}$ for {\tt SimL}\ and 22.8 to 19.1
$\mathrm{Bmag}\,\mathrm{pc}^{-2}$ for {\tt SimL$^\mathtt{nosf}$}. Bottom: $m=2$ power
spectra for {\tt SimL$^\mathtt{nosf}$}, centred at $t=7.6$ (top panel). This figure
can be directly compared with Fig.~\ref{fig:fft3b}. }
\label{fig:fftnosf}
\end{figure}
To firmly establish the role of star formation, we recomputed
{\tt SimL}\ from $t=5.25$~Gyr until $t=7.6$~Gyr switching off the star
formation process in the simulation code ({\tt SimL$^\mathtt{nosf}$}\ in short).
\citet{2006MNRAS.369..853W} used this method for
$\sigma-$drops. Figure~\ref{fig:fftnosf} shows the gas and stellar mass
distributions at $t=7.6$~Gyr. They are significantly different from
{\tt SimL}. The gas distribution is more concentrated in {\tt SimL$^\mathtt{nosf}$}\ than
in {\tt SimL}\ since the gas is no longer consumed by the formation of new stars.
This has two immediate consequences. First, this predictably makes
dissolving the inner bar easier as the gas can now reach the
centre, increasing there the mass that in turn axisymmetrizes the
gravitational potential. Second, no more gas is turned into stars so
that the mass of the inner stellar bar cannot increase. After roughly
2~Gyr, the inner bar is indeed barely detectable in the stellar
distribution of {\tt SimL$^\mathtt{nosf}$}. The spectrogram centred at $t=7.6$~Gyr, as
in Fig.~\ref{fig:fft3b}, confirms that, although it has not yet fully
disappeared, the amplitude of the $m=2$ mode has strongly decreased
with respect to {\tt SimL}.
The role of star formation in sustaining the nuclear bar over several
Gyr is thus demonstrated for the first time.
\section{Conclusions}
\label{sec:conclusions}
Unlike the outcome of most numerical simulations with both stellar and
gaseous components, we have successfully simulated a \emph{long-lived}
inner bar embedded in a large-scale primary bar.
The ratio of the two bar lengths, the ratio of pattern speeds, as well as the age of
the inner stellar bar population and the central gas mass fit well
with observations published in the literature. Moreover, throughout the
simulation, our models go through various morphological phases
representative of the diversity of observations, including SB0.
The most important difference with past simulations leading to
short-lived double-barred galaxies is the lack of overlap between the
primary bar inner Lindblad resonance (ILR$_\mathrm{p}$) and the nuclear bar
corotation (CR$_\mathrm{s}$) and, more generally, the lack of any kind of resonance overlap.
The absence of mode coupling, confirmed by a Fourier analysis, implies
that to sustain a permanent nuclear bar mode another physical or
dynamical mechanism must feed the central waves.
Star formation in the central region is identified as possibly being
responsible for bringing energy to the nuclear mode. Star formation is
also responsible for regulating the gas mass accumulation close to the
centre, in the sense that it prevents a strong increase in mass
density that can destabilize the inner bar orbits.
As a direct consequence (whereas the inner bar can be temporarily
undetectable, leading the pattern speed to be barely measurable or
unmeasurable), the corresponding perturbation modes survive and allow
the revival of the nuclear structure less than 1 Gyr after it
disappears, provided that star formation continues.
A side result of our study is that an overlap between the ILR of
the main bar and the CR of the nuclear bar cannot be systematically
assumed as it is not a necessary condition for the existence of
double-barred galaxies.
Another direct consequence of our simulations is the evidence that
several morphological features in barred galaxies that have been
identified by various names (double-bars, pseudo-bulges, triaxial
bulges, etc.) originate dynamically from an unique inner
mode. {\tt SimL}\ displays all these features at various stages of its
evolution. This speaks for a global analysis of triaxiality in the
central regions of barred galaxies as being a unique dynamical
phenomenon due to persistent modes in the central region.
\section{Acknowledgements}
I warmly thank Witold Maciejewski for fruitful discussions during the
meeting ``The Role of Bars in Galaxy Evolution'' in Granada, which
revived my long-lived interest in double-barred galaxies, and Isabel
P\'erez for organizing this productive meeting. I am grateful to the
anonymous referee for his/her suggestions that have improved the
legibility of the paper. I would also like to acknowledge the
\emph{P\^ole HPC} (High Performance Computing department) of the
University of Strasbourg for supporting this work by providing
technical support and access to computing resources. Part of the
computing resources were funded by the Equipex Equip@Meso
project. Local post-processing resources have been funded by the INSU
Programme National Cosmologie \&\ Galaxies.
|
\section{Introduction}\label{intro:sec}
Molecular spectroscopy deals with the response of a molecule interacting with an external electromagnetic field. The development of attosecond sources \cite{PaulScience2001,HentschelNature2001,CorkumNatPhys2007} allows one to probe in real time coupled electron-ion dynamics after photoionization processes. Two types of processes are seen in these experiments. The motion of the ions is associated with chemical transformations such as dissociation \cite{KelkensbergPRL2009} in the femtosecond domain. The motion of the electrons is associated with electronic rearrangement processes such as charge redistribution \cite{DrescherNature2002,GouliemakisNature2010}, localization \cite{KlingScience2006,SansoneNature2010} as well as ionization processes such as tunneling \cite{UiberackerNature2007} in the attosecond domain.
Modeling coupled electronic-ionic dynamics in photoionization processes is a formidable challenge for most systems. For this reason, previous studies have been limited to one (H$_2^+$) and two (H$_2$) electron benchmark systems \cite{SansoneNature2010, QMI_H2+_H2_1D_CONFIGURATION, GrossPRL2001, BOA_SEPARATE, WalshPRA1998}. A full coupled electronic-ionic 3D treatment has only been achieved for the one electron system H$_2^+$, where the ionic motion is confined to the direction of the laser's polarization \cite{QMI_H2+_H2_1D_CONFIGURATION, ChelkowskiPRA1995}. For a full quantum mechanical treatment of two electron two ion systems (H$_2$), it is necessary to confine both the electronic and ionic motion to the laser's polarization direction. This is a reasonable semiclassical approximation, as the electronic and ionic motion should be predominantly along this direction \cite{QMI_H2+_H2_1D_CONFIGURATION}. Therefore, for most molecules, any quantum-ionic features are typically neglected by instead using classical approximations, e.g., the Born Oppenheimer approximation (BOA) and Ehrenfest dynamics (ED). These approaches rely on a weak coupling between the electronic and ionic wave functions. However, the validity of such approximations breaks down for light atoms, when hybridization between the electronic and ionic wave functions must be included. A quantum versus classical treatment of the ions has been previously used to investigate the localization \cite{SansoneNature2010}, nonsequential double ionization \cite{QMI_H2+_H2_1D_CONFIGURATION} and harmonic generation \cite{GrossPRL2001} of H$_2$, as well as the dissociation \cite{BOA_SEPARATE} and proton kinetic energies \cite{WalshPRA1998} for H$_2^+$.
The aim of this paper is a comparison between a quantum mechanical (QMI) and classical (BOA/ED) treatment of the ionic motion to describe coupled electronic and ionic processes \cite{MY_THESIS}. In particular, we consider three and four body systems of electrons and ions for which a fully quantum mechanical treatment of the coupled electron-ion system is feasible. This comparison with respect to the QMI solution is performed both for the static spectra and for the time dependent linear response spectra. In fact, we find significant differences between the QMI and BOA/ED spectra. These features can be quantitatively analyzed using a simple two-level two-parameter model based on the BOA electronic energy levels and the electron-ion mass ratio. The results of our work will help us to determine the domain of applicability of the simplified BOA and ED approaches to interpret coupled electron-ion experiments for more complicated systems.
The paper is organized as follows: in Sec.~\ref{theory:sec}, we introduce the theoretical methods and models employed to simulate the coupled electronic and ionic processes; in Sec.~\ref{methodology:sec}, we explain the methodology to obtain both the ground state and time dependent linear response spectra, as well as the computational details of our calculations; in Sec.~\ref{results:sec}, we show our results for both, the H$_2^+$ and H$_2$ molecules, which we then analyze according to the model we provide; and finally, in Sec.~\ref{conclusions:sec} we summarize the main conclusions and relevant results of our work. Atomic units a.u. ($\hbar = m_e = e = a_0 = 1$) are used throughout, unless stated otherwise.
\section{Theoretical Background}\label{theory:sec}
\subsection{Quantum electron-ion approach}\label{many_body_problem:sec}
A many-body system composed of $N$ ions and $n$ electrons, where both the electrons and ions are treated quantum mechanically (QMI), is described by the total electron-ion time-dependent Hamiltonian
\begin{equation}\label{MB_hamiltonian:eqn}
\hat H(t) = \hat T_I + \hat T_e + \hat V_{\textit{II}} + \hat V_{\textit{Ie}} + \hat V_{\textit{ee}} + \hat V_{\textit{ext}}(t),
\end{equation}
where $\hat T_I$ and $\hat T_e$ are the ionic and electronic kinetic energy operators, respectively, and $\hat V_{\textit{II}}$, $\hat V_{\textit{Ie}}$, $\hat V_{\textit{ee}}$, and $\hat V_{\textit{ext}}(t)$ are the ion-ion, ion-electron, electron-electron, and external potential energy operators, respectively. The kinetic energy operators take the form
\begin{equation}
\hat T_I = \sum_{\alpha = 1}^N - \frac{1}{2M_{\alpha}} {\bf \nabla}^2_{\alpha},
\end{equation}
where $M_{\alpha}$ is the mass of ion $\alpha$, and
\begin{equation}\label{kinetic_electron:eqn}
\hat T_e = \sum_{i = 1}^n - \frac{1}{2} {\bf \nabla}^2_{i}.
\end{equation}
The interaction between the ions is given by
\begin{equation}\label{ion_ion:eqn}
\hat V_{\textit{II}} = \frac{1}{2} \sum_{\substack{\alpha,\beta = 1 \\ \alpha \neq \beta}}^N \frac{Q_{\alpha} Q_{\beta}}{|{\bf R}_{\alpha}-{\bf R}_{\beta}|},
\end{equation}
where $Q_{\alpha}$, $Q_{\beta}$, {\bf R}$_{\alpha}$ and {\bf R}$_{\beta}$ are the corresponding charges and positions of ion $\alpha$ and $\beta$. Similarly, the electron-electron repulsion is
\begin{equation}\label{electron_electron:eqn}
\hat V_{\textit{ee}} = \frac{1}{2} \sum_{\substack {i,j = 1 \\ i \neq j}}^n \frac{1}{|{\bf r}_{i}-{\bf r}_{j}|},
\end{equation}
where {\bf r}$_i$ and {\bf r}$_j$ are the positions of electrons $i$ and $j$, while the interaction between electrons and ions is
\begin{equation}\label{ion_electron:eqn}
\hat V_{\textit{Ie}} = - \sum_{\alpha = 1}^N \sum_{i=1}^{n} \frac{Q_{\alpha}}{|{\bf r}_{i}-{\bf R}_{\alpha}|}.
\end{equation}
Finally, $\hat V_{\textit{ext}}(t)$ describes the interaction of the system of electrons and ions with an external electromagnetic time-dependent field, defined explicitly in Sec.~\ref{spectra:sec}.
The time-dependent Schr\"{o}dinger equation takes the form
\begin{equation}\label{MB_depend:eqn}
\begin{split}
i \frac{\partial\psi}{\partial t} &=
i \frac{\partial}{\partial t} \psi({\bf R}_1 S_1,{\bf R}_2 S_2,...{\bf R}_N S_N;{\bf r}_1 s_1,{\bf r}_2 s_2...{\bf r}_n s_n,t)\\ &=
\hat H(t) \psi({\bf R}_1 S_1,{\bf R}_2 S_2,...{\bf R}_N S_N;{\bf r}_1 s_1,{\bf r}_2 s_2...{\bf r}_n s_n,t),
\end{split}
\end{equation}
where $\psi$ is the time-dependent electron-ion wavefunction. This depends on the positions ${\bf R}_{\alpha}$ and ${\bf r}_i$ and on the spin coordinates $S_{\alpha}$ and $s_{i}$ of ion $\alpha$ and electron $i$, respectively.
For time-independent problems ($\hat V_{\textit{ext}}(t)=0$), the general solution of the time-dependent Schr\"{o}dinger equation can be written as
\begin{equation}\label{TISE:eqn}
\psi = \sum_k c_k e^{-i\varepsilon_k t}
\psi _k({\bf R}_1 S_1,{\bf R}_2 S_2,...{\bf R}_N S_N;{\bf r}_1 s_1,{\bf r}_2 s_2...{\bf r}_n s_n)
\end{equation}
where $\varepsilon_k$ and $\psi_k$ are the $k^{th}$ eigenvalue and eigenstate of the electron-ion stationary Schr\"{o}dinger equation
\begin{equation}\label{MB_indep:eqn}
\begin{split}
\hat H \psi_k & = \hat H \psi_k({\bf R}_1 S_1,{\bf R}_2 S_2,...{\bf R}_N S_N;{\bf r}_1 s_1,{\bf r}_2 s_2...{\bf r}_n s_n)\\ & =
\varepsilon_k \psi_k({\bf R}_1 S_1,{\bf R}_2 S_2,...{\bf R}_N S_N;{\bf r}_1 s_1,{\bf r}_2 s_2...{\bf r}_n s_n),
\end{split}
\end{equation}
with
\begin{equation}\label{USE:eqn}
\hat H = \hat T_I + \hat T_e + \hat V_{\textit{II}} + \hat V_{\textit{Ie}} + \hat V_{\textit{ee}}.
\end{equation}
We will next focus on the time-independent solution until introducing an external field in Sec.~\ref{spectra:sec}.
Solving the QMI problem is very demanding computationally for many-body systems. In fact, it quickly becomes unfeasible for systems with more than three independent variables. For this reason, we restrict consideration herein to one or two-electron diatomic molecules whose motion is confined to one direction (see Sec.~\ref{model_1D:sec}). By applying an appropriate coordinate transformation, such systems may be modeled with only two or three independent variables (see Appendix~\ref{AppendixA}). In Secs.~\ref{BOA:sec} and \ref{ED:sec}, we introduce two of the most widely used approximations to simplify the general many-body electron-ion problem.
\subsection{Born-Oppenheimer approximation}\label{BOA:sec}
Within the Born-Oppenheimer approximation (BOA) \cite{BOA_ORIGINAL}, the total electronic-ionic wavefunction $\psi$ is assumed to be separable into an ionic $\chi$ and electronic $\varphi$ part. As the electrons move much faster than the ions, we assume that the kinetic energy of the ions does not cause the excitation of the electrons to another electronic state, i.e., an adiabatic approximation. Such an approximation is valid so long as the ratio of vibrational to electronic energies, $E_{\textit{vib}}$ to $E_{\textit{elec}}$, which goes as the root of the electron-ion mass ratio, i.e., $ E_{\textit{vib}}/E_{\textit{elec}} \approx \sqrt{m_e/M}$, is small \cite{BOA_ORIGINAL}(see Appendix~\ref{AppendixB} for details). Since for a proton $M_{\mathrm{p}} \approx \mathrm{1836}m_e$ and $E_{\textit{vib}}/E_{\textit{elec}} \sim 0.02$, the BOA is expected to work quite well for our molecules. We thus may neglect $\hat T_I = 0$ from Eq.~(\ref{USE:eqn}), although the electrons still feel the static field of the ions ($\hat V_{eI}, \hat V_{\textit{II}} \neq 0$).
The separable BOA solution $\psi$ of the electron-ion stationary Schr\"{o}dinger equation (\ref{TISE:eqn}) is given by \cite{BOA_SEPARATE}
\begin{equation}\label{separate:eqn}
\psi = \chi ({\bf R}_1 S_1,{\bf R}_2 S_2,...{\bf R}_N S_N)
\varphi^{({\bf R}_1,{\bf R}_2,...{\bf R}_N)}({\bf r}_1 s_1,{\bf r}_2 s_2...{\bf r}_n s_n),
\end{equation}
where $\chi$ depends on the ionic coordinates only and $\varphi$ depends on both the electronic coordinates and on the ionic coordinates which, however, only enter into the electronic wavefunctions as parameters. As shown in Ref. \cite{BOA_SEPARATE}, this may be done for the Hamiltonian of Eq.~\ref{MB_hamiltonian:eqn} without loss of generality.
If we insert Eq.~(\ref{separate:eqn}) directly into Eq.~(\ref{MB_indep:eqn}), we obtain the general coupled electron-ion BOA problem
\begin{equation}\label{BOA_exp:eqn}
\begin{split}
\hat H \psi_{k} =& - \sum_{\alpha = 1}^N \frac{{\nabla}^2_{\alpha} \chi}{2M_{\alpha}} \varphi - \chi \sum_{\alpha = 1}^N \frac{{\nabla}^2_{\alpha} \varphi}{2M_{\alpha}} - \sum_{\alpha = 1}^N \frac{{\bf \nabla}_{\alpha} \chi \cdot {\bf \nabla}_{\alpha} \varphi}{M_{\alpha}} \\
& + \chi \left(\sum_{i = 1}^n - \frac{\nabla_{i}^2}{2} + \hat V_{\textit{Ie}} + \hat V_{\textit{ee}} + \hat V_{\textit{II}}\right) \varphi \\
=&\ E_{k} \psi_{k}.
\end{split}
\end{equation}
However, one normally separates Eq.~(\ref{BOA_exp:eqn}) into an electronic problem only in $\varphi$ and an ionic problem only in $\chi$. To do so, one first solves the electronic-only BOA frozen ion Schr\"{o}dinger equation, where the ionic coordinates ${\bf R}_{\alpha}$ only enter as fixed parameters in $\varphi$:
\begin{equation}\label{general_He:eqn}
\begin{split}
\hat H_e \varphi_i &= \hat H_e \varphi_i^{({\bf R}_1,{\bf R}_2,...{\bf R}_N)}({\bf r}_1 s_1,{\bf r}_2 s_2...{\bf r}_n s_n)\\
& =
E_i ({\bf R}_1,{\bf R}_2,...{\bf R}_N) \varphi_i^{({\bf R}_1,{\bf R}_2,...{\bf R}_N)}({\bf r}_1 s_1,{\bf r}_2 s_2...{\bf r}_n s_n),
\end{split}
\end{equation}
where
\begin{equation}
\hat H_e = \hat T_e + \hat V_{\textit{Ie}} + \hat V_{\textit{ee}} + \hat V_{\textit{II}}.
\end{equation}
In this way, one may find the so-called $i^{th}$ potential energy surfaces $E_i ({\bf R}_1,{\bf R}_2,...{\bf R}_N)$ (PES). These are representations of the electronic energy landscape as a function of the ionic coordinates.
In the next step, the ionic BOA Schr\"{o}dinger equation is solved by adding the previously neglected kinetic energy of the ions to the potential energy surfaces obtained from the frozen ion Schr\"{o}dinger equation
\begin{equation}\label{ionic_general:eqn}
\hat H_I^i \chi_{ij}({\bf R}_1 S_1,{\bf R}_2 S_2,...{\bf R}_N S_N) \\
= E_{ij} \chi_{ij}({\bf R}_1 S_1,{\bf R}_2 S_2,...{\bf R}_N S_N),
\end{equation}
where
\begin{equation}\label{ionic_value:eqn}
\hat H_I^i = \sum_{\alpha=1}^{N} - \frac{1}{2M_{\alpha}}{\nabla^2_{\alpha}} + E_i({\bf R}_1,{\bf R}_2,...{\bf R}_N),
\end{equation}
and the ionic excitations $j$ depend on the electronic excitations, $i$.
Comparing Eq.~(\ref{BOA_exp:eqn}) with Eq.~(\ref{ionic_value:eqn}) we realize that the second and third terms of Eq.~(\ref{BOA_exp:eqn}) are neglected in the BOA. This is because we assume that the kinetic energy of the ions is not affecting the electronic part $\varphi$, i.e., ${\bf \nabla}_\alpha\varphi \approx 0$.
\subsection{Ehrenfest dynamics}\label{ED:sec}
Within the Ehrenfest dynamics (ED) scheme \cite{ED_ORIGINAL}, we solve the coupled evolution of the electrons and ions. The electrons evolve quantum mechanically, whereas the ions evolve classically on a mean time-dependent PES $\varphi_i(t)$ weighted by the different BOA PES $\varphi_i$ in Eq.~(\ref{general_He:eqn})
\begin{equation}\label{BOA_ED:eqn}
\varphi_i({\bf R}_{\alpha}(t)) = \sum_{i}^{n} c_i(t) \varphi_i
\end{equation}
The ions are evolved according to Newton's equation of motion
\begin{equation}
{\bf F}_{\textit{ED}}({\bf R}_{\alpha}(t)) = M_{\alpha}\frac{d^2 \mathbf{R}_{\alpha}(t)}{dt^2}
\end{equation}
which satisfies the following potential energy derivative condition
\begin{equation}\label{classicalforces:eqn}
\begin{split}
{\bf F}_{\textit{ED}}({\bf R}_{\alpha}(t)) &= - \sum_{i}^{n} \left|c_i(t)\right|^2 \vec{\nabla}_\alpha \varepsilon_i \left({\bf R}_{\alpha}(t)\right) \\
&= - \left \langle \varphi (t) \left | \vec{\nabla}_\alpha H_{e}({\bf R}_{\alpha}(t)) \right | \varphi (t) \right \rangle
\end{split}
\end{equation}
where Eq.~(\ref{BOA_ED:eqn}) and the Hellmann-Feynman theorem have been employed. The Ehrenfest electron-ion scheme consists of the time propagation of the coupled Eqs.~(\ref{general_He:eqn}) and (\ref{classicalforces:eqn}).
\subsection{Model systems: Initial configurations and Hamiltonians}\label{model_1D:sec}
We model the positively charged one electron H$_2^+$ and neutral two electron H$_2$ homonuclear diatomic molecules, assuming their motion is confined to one direction. Such a model should provide a reasonable description of a molecule excited by a laser field, where the electronic and ionic motion are confined to the polarization axis of the laser field \cite{BOA_SEPARATE}. In this case the QMI problem described in Sec.~\ref{many_body_problem:sec}, where both electrons and ions are treated quantum mechanically, can be solved exactly. Furthermore, by working in center of mass coordinates, the computational effort required to solve Eq.~(\ref{MB_depend:eqn}) is significantly reduced.
However, the singularity in the bare Coulomb interaction of Eqs.~(\ref{ion_ion:eqn}), (\ref{electron_electron:eqn}), and (\ref{ion_electron:eqn}) in 1D makes the direct numerical solution of the Schr\"{o}dinger equation (\ref{MB_depend:eqn}) unfeasible. Instead, one employs the so-called ``soft Coulomb interaction'' \cite{SOFT_COULOMB,BOA_SEPARATE}. For two particles $i$ and $j$ with charges $Q_i$ and $Q_j$, the soft Coulomb interaction $V_{int}$ has the general form
\begin{equation}\label{soft_coulomb:eqn}
V_{int}(s) = \frac{Q_i Q_j}{\sqrt{s^2 + \Delta^2}},
\end{equation}
where $s$ is the separation between the two charges and $\Delta$ is the soft Coulomb parameter~\cite{SOFT_COULOMB}. Typically, $\Delta = a_0$, although other values can also be used \cite{QMI_H2+_H2_1D_CONFIGURATION}.
In essence, the soft Coulomb interaction amounts to a displacement of the trajectories of the two particles in an orthogonal direction. So for a hydrogen atom, a soft Coulomb interaction of
\begin{equation}
V_{int}(s) = - \frac{1}{\sqrt{s^2 + a_0^2}},
\end{equation}
is equivalent to having a bare Coulomb interaction with the electron and proton trajectories required to be parallel, with a minimum separation of $a_0$. This is a quite reasonable assumption, as the most probable electron-proton separation in a hydrogen atom is the Bohr radius $a_0$. Soft Coulomb parameters correspond to the separation between the 1D trajectories that each electron and ion will move along in 3D with a bare Coulomb interaction. We may directly map the 1D soft Coulomb problem to a bare Coulomb problem in 3D where the electrons and ions are separated by the soft Coulomb parameter distances shown in Fig.~\ref{EPS_VALUES:fig}, while their motion is confined in one direction. In this way, one clearly sees that constraint rotations of the molecules are possible in 3D, while their motion is still confined to 1D. As discussed in Sec.~\ref{spectra:sec}, the molecules will be perturbed by a kick confined in one direction.
\begin{figure
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[scale=0.3]{Fig1}
\end{center}
\caption{\footnotesize
(Color online) Schematic representation of the (a--d) H$_2^+$ and (e--i) H$_2$ geometries for the minimum ionic separation $\Delta_{\textit{II}}$, ion--electron separation $\Delta_{\textit{Ie}}$, and electron--electron separation $\Delta_{\textit{ee}}$ for each configuration. Protons are shown in red and electrons in black.}
\label{EPS_VALUES:fig}
\end{figure}
In Fig.~\ref{EPS_VALUES:fig} we show the various configurations we have employed to model an H$_2^+$ or H$_2$ molecule whose electronic and ionic motion is confined to one direction. These configurations are specified by the soft Coulomb parameters between the ions $\Delta_{\textit{II}}$, the electrons $\Delta_{\textit{ee}}$ and the ions and electrons $\Delta_{\textit{Ie}}$. One such configuration has been used previously \cite{QMI_H2+_H2_1D_CONFIGURATION} to study the dynamics of a one-dimensional H$_2$ model molecule in strong laser fields by means of QMI.
An analysis of the effect of the initial configuration on the optical spectra is shown in Sec.~\ref{results:sec}. The classical energies of positively charged and neutral homonuclear diatomic molecules whose motion is confined to one direction are given by
\begin{equation}\label{E_ini:eqn}
\begin{split}
E =&\ \frac{1}{2} M V_{1}^{2} + \frac{1}{2} M V_{2}^{2} + \frac{1}{2} v_1^2
- \frac{1}{\sqrt{(x_1-X_1)^2+\Delta_{\textit{Ie}}^2}} \\
&-
\frac{1}{\sqrt {(X_2-x_1)^2 +\Delta_{\textit{Ie}}^2}}
+ \frac{1}{\sqrt {(X_2 - X_1)^2+\Delta_{\textit{II}}^2}}\;,
\end{split}
\end{equation}
and
\begin{equation}\label{E_ini_hydrogen:eqn}
\begin{split}
E =&\ \frac{1}{2} M V_{1}^{2} + \frac{1}{2} M V_{2}^{2} + \frac{1}{2} v_{1}^{2} + \frac{1}{2} v_{2}^{2}\\& -
\frac{1}{\sqrt{(x_1-X_1)^2+\Delta_{\textit{Ie}}^2}} - \frac{1}{\sqrt{(X_2-x_2)^2+\Delta_{\textit{Ie}}^2}}
\\&- \frac{1}{\sqrt{(x_2-X_1)^2+\Delta_{\textit{Ie}}^2}} - \frac{1}{\sqrt {(X_2-x_1)^2 +\Delta_{\textit{Ie}}^2}}\\& +
\frac{1}{\sqrt {(X_2 - X_1)^2+\Delta_{\textit{II}}^2}} + \frac{1}{\sqrt {(x_2 - x_1)^2+\Delta_{\textit{ee}}^2}},
\end{split}
\end{equation}
respectively. Here, $M$ is the ion mass; $V_1$, $V_2$, $X_1$ and $X_2$ are the ionic velocities and positions for both molecules along the direction of motion along the direction of motion.
The first three and four terms of Eqs.~(\ref{E_ini:eqn}) and (\ref{E_ini_hydrogen:eqn}) are the kinetic energies of the electrons and ions in the molecules, as explained above. The remaining terms correspond to the attractive and repulsive electrostatic potential energy terms between such electrons and ions.
The spatial configuration of positively charged or neutral homogeneous diatomic molecules in 1D does not change if the particle positions are translated uniformly. This reduces our three- and four-body coordinate problems into two- and three-body ones, respectively.
We rewrite the classical energies in Eqs.~(\ref{E_ini:eqn}) and (\ref{E_ini_hydrogen:eqn}) in terms of the center-of-mass transformation \cite{CM} (see Appendix \ref{AppendixA}) to obtain the following two-body ($X$,$\xi$) and three-body ($X$,$x$,$\xi$) Hamiltonians
\begin{equation}\label{quantum_H:eqn}
\begin{split}
\hat H(X,\xi) =& - \frac{1}{M} \frac{\partial^2}{\partial{X}^2} -
\frac{2M+1}{4M} \frac{\partial^2}{\partial{\xi}^2}-
\frac{1}{\sqrt{(\frac{X}{2} +\xi)^2 + \Delta_{\textit{Ie}}^2}}
\\ &-\frac{1}{\sqrt{(\frac{X}{2} -\xi)^2 + \Delta_{\textit{Ie}}^2}} +
\frac{1}{\sqrt{X^2 + \Delta_{\textit{II}}^2}},
\end{split}
\end{equation}
and
\begin{equation}\label{H_int:eqn}
\begin{split}
\hat H(X,x,\xi) =&
- \frac{1}{M} \frac{\partial^2}{\partial{X}^2} -
\frac{\partial^2}{\partial{x}^2} -
\frac{1+M}{4M} \frac{\partial^2}{\partial{\xi}^2} \\&-
\frac{1}{\sqrt{(\frac{X}{2} - \frac{x}{2} + \xi)^2 + \Delta_{\textit{Ie}}^2}}
- \frac{1}{\sqrt{(\frac{X}{2} - \frac{x}{2} - \xi)^2 + \Delta_{\textit{Ie}}^2}} \\
&- \frac{1}{\sqrt{(\frac{X}{2} + \frac{x}{2} + \xi)^2 + \Delta_{\textit{Ie}}^2}}
- \frac{1}{\sqrt{(\frac{X}{2} + \frac{x}{2} - \xi)^2 + \Delta_{\textit{Ie}}^2}} \\&+
\frac{1}{\sqrt{x^2 + \Delta_{\textit{ee}}^2}}
+ \frac{1}{\sqrt{X^2 + \Delta_{\textit{II}}^2}},
\end{split}
\end{equation}
for positively charged and neutral homogeneous diatomic molecules, respectively, after removing the center of mass term. Here $X$ and $x$ are the ionic and electronic separations and $\xi$ is the separation between ionic and electronic centers of mass along the direction in which their motion is confined.
Although the electrons are treated quantum mechanically along their direction of motion, the confinement of their motion and position along one direction is inherently classical. For this reason, our treatment herein is essentially semiclassical: quantum mechanical along the direction of motion, and classical perpendicular to the direction of motion. This has important repercussions for the H$_2$ configurations shown in Fig.~\ref{EPS_VALUES:fig}(g) and (h). For these cases, the Hamiltonian of Eq.~(\ref{H_int:eqn}) is no longer symmetric under ion or electron exchange, since $\Delta_{\textit{Ie}}$ is either $\frac{1}{3}a_0$ or $\frac{2}{3}a_0$. This reflects the limitations of such a semiclassical treatment. So although the Hamiltonian of Eq.~(\ref{H_int:eqn}) is still symmetric under ion or electron exchange for the H$_2$ configurations shown in Fig.~\ref{EPS_VALUES:fig}(e), (f), and (i), the confinement of the electron's position perpendicular to its motion may still have an important impact for these configurations.
Our aim here is to assess the accuracy of the approximations introduced in Secs.~\ref{BOA:sec} and \ref{ED:sec}, in which the ions are treated classically. To accomplish this, we vary the ionic mass $M$ in our homogeneous diatomic molecules for the many-body problem, while fixing the the ionic charge $Q = e$. We only consider $Q = e$ because the repulsion between the ions of more massive homonuclear diatomic molecules with a single electron would be so large that the molecules would be unstable \cite{UNSTABLE}. Furthermore, this allows us to directly compare absorption spectra between these model systems for a fixed interaction potential.
\subsection{Symmetries of the many-body wavefunction}\label{parity:sec}
Since for our positively charged homogeneous diatomic molecules there are one electron and two ions, the antisymmetry of the many-body wavefunction must be enforced for the ions only as
\begin{equation}
\psi (X_1 S_1,X_2 S_2,x s) = - \psi (X_2 S_2,X_1 S_1,x s),
\end{equation}
for the triplet and
\begin{equation}
\psi (X_1 S_1,X_2 S_2,x s) = \psi (X_2 S_2,X_1 S_1,x s),
\end{equation}
for the singlet.
For our neutral homogeneous diatomic molecules there are two electrons and two ions. Therefore, the antisymmetry of the many-body wavefunction must be enforced both for the ions and the electrons as
\begin{equation}
\psi (X_1 S_1,X_2 S_2,x_1 s_1,x_2 s_2) = - \psi (X_2 S_2,X_1 S_1,x_1 s_1,x_2 s_2),
\end{equation}
for the ionic triplet,
\begin{equation}
\psi (X_1 S_1,X_2 S_2,x_1 s_1,x_2 s_2) = \psi (X_2 S_2,X_1 S_1,x_1 s_1,x_2 s_2),
\end{equation}
for the ionic singlet,
\begin{equation}
\psi (X_1 S_1,X_2 S_2,x_1 s_1,x_2 s_2) = - \psi (X_1 S_1,X_2 S_2,x_2 s_2,x_1 s_1),
\end{equation}
for the electronic triplet, and
\begin{equation}
\psi (X_1 S_1,X_2 S_2,x_1 s_1,x_2 s_2) = - \psi (X_1 S_1,X_2 S_2,x_2 s_2,x_1 s_1),
\end{equation}
for the electronic singlet, respectively.
Therefore, due to the exchange symmetry of the many-body wavefunction, in order to have a
total antisymmetric many-body wavefunction, the spatial part of the ionic and electronic wavefunction must be odd for the triplet and even for the singlet under the exchange of two identical particles. Consequently, we will only be concerned with the spatial part of the wavefunction, with the spin part already being separated off due to the exchange symmetry of the many-body wavefunction.
\section{Methodology}\label{methodology:sec}
\subsection{Ground state}\label{BOA_molecules:sec}
The QMI eigenvalues are obtained by inserting Eqs.~(\ref{quantum_H:eqn}) and (\ref{H_int:eqn}) into Eq.~(\ref{MB_indep:eqn}) for the H$_2^+$ and H$_2$ molecules, respectively.
To obtain the PES within the BOA and ED we would insert Eqs.~(\ref{quantum_H:eqn}) and
(\ref{H_int:eqn}), neglecting the first term, into Eq.~(\ref{general_He:eqn}) for the H$_2^+$ and H$_2$ molecules, respectively. For the BOA and ED ground state electron-ion level, we do not compute Eq.~(\ref{ionic_general:eqn}). Instead, we fit the ground state PES around its minimum energy at the inter-ionic distance $X_{\textit{eq}}$ using a harmonic approximation $E_{\textit{gs}}(X_{\textit{eq}}) + \frac{1}{2}k_1 {(X-X_{\textit{eq}})}^2$, where $k_1=\omega_I^2 \mu_p$ is the harmonic constant, $\omega_I$ is the harmonic oscillator vibrational frequency and $\mu_p$ is the ionic reduced mass defined in Eq.~(\ref{reduced_mass_electron:eqn}). From $\omega_I$, we obtain the ground state electron-ion eigenvalue of a harmonic oscillator $\varepsilon_{\textit{gs}}^{\textit{BOA/ED}} = E_{\textit{gs}}(X_{\textit{eq}}) + \frac{1}{2}\omega_I$ in the BOA and ED PES picture.
The inversion symmetry with respect to the inter-ionic $X$ coordinate of the potential in Eqs.~(\ref{quantum_H:eqn}) and (\ref{H_int:eqn}), leads to a doubly-degenerate solution $\varepsilon_k$ for each state $\psi_k$ in Eq.~(\ref{MB_indep:eqn}), for sufficiently bound global ground state potentials. The inversion symmetry with respect to the inter-electronic $x$ coordinate of the potential in Eqs.~(\ref{quantum_H:eqn}) and (\ref{H_int:eqn}) is not related to the statistics of the ions, but to the symmetry of the electronic molecular orbital.
\subsection{Time dependent linear response spectra}\label{spectra:sec}
To obtain the linear response photoabsorption spectra we apply an initial impulsive perturbation, or ``kick'' \cite{KICK}
\begin{equation}\label{dipole_coord_old:eqn}
\begin{split}
\mathcal{K}(\mathrm{H}_2^+) &= e^{i K(X_1 + X_2 -x)}, \\
\mathcal{K}(\mathrm{H}_2) &= e^{i K(X_1 + X_2 - x_1 - x_2)},
\end{split}
\end{equation}
to the ground state wavefunctions $\psi_{\textit{gs}}$ of our H$_2^+$ and H$_2$ molecules, respectively, for the BOA and QMI approaches. $K$ is a measure of the strength of the kick. We employ a converged kick strength of $K=0.001$, for which the linear response spectra does not change if it is decreased further. Using the center of mass coordinates defined in Appendix \ref{AppendixA}, the terms in Eq.~(\ref{dipole_coord_old:eqn}) become
\begin{equation}\label{dipole_coord_new:eqn}
\begin{split}
\mathcal{K}(\mathrm{H}_2^+) &=e^{i K\left(X_{\mathrm{CM}_2} - \frac{2M+2}{2M+1}\xi\right)}, \\
\mathcal{K}(\mathrm{H}_2) &=e^{-i K2\xi},
\end{split}
\end{equation}
where $X_{\mathrm{CM}_2}$ is the global center of mass coordinate, and $\xi$ is the separation between the ionic and electronic centers of mass along the direction in which their motion is confined. The perturbative kick $\mathcal{K}$ will only induce polarization on the coordinates $\xi$ defined for H$_2^+$ and H$_2$ in Eqs.~(\ref{MU:eqn}) and (\ref{JUJU:eqn}) for the BOA and QMI methods.
In linear response, we expand Eq.~(\ref{dipole_coord_new:eqn}) in terms of $K$, neglecting higher order terms
\begin{equation}\label{dipole_coord_final:eqn}
\begin{split}
\mathcal{K}(\mathrm{H}_2^+) &\approx 1 + i K\left(X_{\mathrm{CM}_2} - \frac{2M+2}{2M+1}\xi\right),\\
\mathcal{K}(\mathrm{H}_2) &\approx 1 - i K2\xi.
\end{split}
\end{equation}
For the ED approach one should follow the same procedure starting from Eq.~(\ref{dipole_coord_old:eqn}), but substituting the electronic coordinates $x$ for $-\frac{2M+2}{2M+1}\xi \approx -\xi \, \mathrm{when} \, M \gg 1$ for H$_2^+$ and $x_2 + x_1$ for $-2\xi$ for H$_2$. During the time propagation the ions are not kicked, but evolve as parameters according to Eq.~(\ref{classicalforces:eqn}). In this case, the electron is kicked relative to the center of mass of the ions for the H$_2^+$ molecule, and the two electrons are kicked relative to their distance to the ions for the H$_2$ molecule. However, the linear response absorption spectra does not depend on uniform translations of the ions and electrons.
The enforced time-reversal symmetry evolution operator \cite{TRES} we apply to propagate our equations after this external perturbation has been applied is given by
\begin{equation}
U(t + \Delta t, t) = e^{-i \frac{\Delta t}{2} H(t + \Delta t)} \times e^{-i \frac{\Delta t}{2} H(t)},
\end{equation}
where the Hamiltonian $H(t+\Delta t)$ is calculated from
\begin{equation}\label{33}
\psi(t+\Delta t) = e^{-i\Delta t H(t)} \psi(t),
\end{equation}
and the kicked initial state we propagate is
\begin{equation}\label{EQ_TERM:eqn}
\psi(\Delta t) = e^{-i \Delta t H_0} \mathcal{K} \psi_{\textit{gs}},
\end{equation}
where $\psi_{\textit{gs}}$ is the ground state eigenstate of the time independent Hamiltonian $H_0$ of Eqs. (\ref{quantum_H:eqn}) and (\ref{H_int:eqn}) for H$^+_2$ and H$_2$ , respectively.
The time dependent Hamiltonian $H(t)$ is then obtained by time propagation at each time step self consistently according to Eq.~(\ref{33}), starting from the kicked initial state given in Eq.~(\ref{EQ_TERM:eqn}). The expectation value of the dipole moment $d$ at time $t$ is
\begin{equation}\label{dt:eqn}
d(t) = \langle \psi(t)| \hat \xi | \psi(t) \rangle.
\end{equation}
If we assume that the Hamiltonian does not evolve in time and we insert Eq. (\ref{dipole_coord_final:eqn}) into Eq. (\ref{EQ_TERM:eqn}), using the completeness relation $\sum_k |\psi_k \rangle \langle \psi_k | = \mathbb{1}$ and Eq. (\ref{TISE:eqn}) we get
\begin{equation}\label{TD_pw:eqn}
|\psi(t)\rangle \approx e ^{-i\varepsilon_{\textit{gs}} t} |\psi_{\textit{gs}}\rangle -
i K \sum_k e ^{-i\varepsilon_{k} t} \left \langle \psi_k \left | \frac{2M+2}{2M+1}\hat{\xi} \right| \psi_{\textit{gs}}
\right \rangle | \psi_k \rangle
\end{equation}
for the H$_2^+$ molecule and
\begin{equation}\label{TD_pw_H2:eqn}
\begin{split}
|\psi(t) \rangle &\approx e ^{-i\varepsilon_{\textit{gs}} t} |\psi_{\textit{gs}} \rangle - i K \sum_k e ^{-i\varepsilon_{k} t}
\left \langle \psi_k \left| 2\hat{\xi} \right| \psi_{\textit{gs}} \right \rangle | \psi_k \rangle.
\end{split}
\end{equation}
for the H$_2$ molecule. From Eqs.~(\ref{TD_pw:eqn}) and (\ref{TD_pw_H2:eqn}), we see that only the $\psi_{\textit{gs}}$ to odd $k$ dipole moment matrix elements are non-zero by symmetry, i.e parity, since $\hat \xi$ is an odd operator.
Eq.~(\ref{dt:eqn}) can be written as
\begin{equation}\label{euler:eqn}
d(t)\ \approx -2K \frac{2M+2}{2M+1} \sum_k \sin \omega_k t \left| \left \langle \psi_{k} \left | \hat \xi \right | \psi_{\textit{gs}} \right \rangle \right|^2,
\end{equation}
for the H$_2^+$ molecules using Eq.~(\ref{TD_pw:eqn}) and
\begin{equation}\label{euler2:eqn}
d(t)\ \approx -4K
\sum_k \sin\omega_k t \left| \left \langle \psi_{k} \left | \hat \xi \right | \psi_{\textit{gs}} \right \rangle \right |^2\!,
\end{equation}
for the H$_2$ molecules using Eq.~(\ref{TD_pw_H2:eqn}), where $d(t)$ depends linearly on $K$ and $\omega_k \equiv \varepsilon_k - \varepsilon_{\textit{gs}}$.
However, in the ED approach the ionic coordinates are updated at each time step. This makes $\hat{\xi}$ and the Hamiltonian time dependent. For this reason, the dipole moment from the ED approach does not necessarily have the form of Eqs.~(\ref{euler:eqn}) and (\ref{euler2:eqn}). As we will show in Sec. \ref{H2results:sec}, the time-dependent effects of zero-point motion within ED, which are incorporated into the coordinate $\xi(t) = x - X_{\textrm{CM}_{1}}$, have an important impact on the spectra.
The optical photoabsorption cross section spectra $\sigma_{abs}$ is obtained by performing a discrete Fourier transform of $d(t)$ \cite{FT}. More precisely,
\begin{equation}\label{FT:eqn}
\sigma_{abs} = 4 \pi \alpha \omega {\rm Im}\left[ \frac{1}{K} \sum_{t=0}^T \Delta t e^{-i \omega t} f\left(\frac{t}{T}\right) \left[d(t)-d(0)\right]\right],
\end{equation}
where
\begin{equation}\label{THIRD_ORDER_POL:eqn}
f(x) = e^{-25x^2},
\end{equation}
is a Gaussian damping applied to improve the resolution of the photoabsorption peaks, $\omega$ is the frequency of the oscillations of $d(t)$, $\alpha$ is the fine structure constant, $T=1000$ is the total propagation time, and $\Delta t=0.01$ is the time step.
\subsection{Computational details}
All numerical calculations have been performed using the real space electronic structure code \texttt{Octopus} \cite{OCTOPUS}. We discretize the configuration space of the H$_2^+$ and H$_2$ molecules, using a finite set of values (i.e. a so-called grid) for the coordinates $X$, $x$ and $\xi$ in the box intervals $X \in [-L_X,L_X]$, $x \in [-L_x,L_x]$ and $\xi \in [-L_\xi,L_\xi]$.
These are discretized as
\begin{equation}
\begin{split}
X_i &= -L_X + i\Delta X \ {\mbox {for}} \ i=0,1,2...N_X,\\
x_j &= -L_x + j\Delta x \ {\mbox {for}} \ j=0,1,2...N_x,\\
\xi_k &= -L_\xi + k\Delta \xi \ {\mbox {for}} \ k=0,1,2...N_\xi,
\end{split}
\end{equation}
using $N_X$, $N_x$ and $N_{\xi}$ equally spaced points, respectively. The spacing between two adjacent points in the $X$, $x$ and $\xi$ directions are $\Delta X = \frac{\mathrm{2}L_X}{N_X}$, $\Delta x = \frac{\mathrm{2}L_x}{N_x}$, $\Delta\xi = \frac{\mathrm{2}L_\xi}{N_\xi}$. Convergence is achieved when a decrease in $\Delta X$, $\Delta x$, $\Delta \xi$ and an increase in $L_X$, $L_x$, $L_{\xi}$ does not change the electron-ion static and time propagation linear response spectra.
For the H$_2^+$ type molecules, ground state convergence is achieved for $L_X=L_{\xi}=10a_0$, $\Delta X=0.05a_0$ and $\Delta \xi =0.1a_0$. To obtain the PES we have used $L_\xi=100a_0$ and $\Delta \xi=0.1a_0$. Generally, the convergence of the QMI optical spectra requires $L_x =30a_0$, $L_{\xi}=80a_0$, $\Delta X =0.01a_0$ and $\Delta \xi=0.5a_0$. However, for the ionic mass $M$ of $\upmu$ case, convergence required $L_X =100a_0$, $L_{\xi}=80a_0$, $\Delta X =0.03a_0$ and $\Delta \xi=0.5a_0$. Finally, for the ED and BOA optical spectra we have used $L_{\xi} =500a_0$ and $\Delta \xi=0.1a_0$.
For the H$_2$ type molecules, ground state convergence is achieved for $L_X=L_{\xi}=L_x=10a_0$, $\Delta X=0.07a_0$, $\Delta \xi=0.2a_0$ and $\Delta x=0.5a_0$. To obtain the PES we have used $L_\xi=L_{x}=40a_0$ and $\Delta \xi =\Delta x =0.2a_0$. The convergence of the QMI optical spectra requires $L_X=10a_0$, $L_x=80a_0$, $L_{\xi}=35a_0$, $\Delta X=0.07a_0$, $\Delta x = 0.5a_0$ and $\Delta \xi = 0.6a_0$. Finally, for the ED and BOA optical spectra we have used $L_{\xi}=L_x=200a_0$, $\Delta \xi = \Delta x = 0.5a_0$.
Within the BOA and ED, the $X$ coordinate does not need to be discretized quantum mechanically. It is either fixed as a parameter in BOA or it changes according to the dynamic equations in ED. As a consequence, the two and three variable bare Coulomb QMI problems confined to 1D trajectories for the H$_2^+$ and H$_2$ molecules respectively, become one and two variable BOA and ED problems. These are easier to compute numerically, thus providing a more attractive alternative.
\section{Results and Discussion}\label{results:sec}
\subsection{H$_2^+$ and H$_2$ results}\label{H2results:sec}
\begin{figure
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[scale=0.3]{Fig2}
\end{center}
\caption{
(Color online) BOA ground state PESs relative to $E_{0}(X_{\textit{eq}})$ in eV,
versus $\sqrt{X^2 + \Delta_{\textit{II}}^2}$ in $\AA$\ for (a) H$_2^+$ and (b) H$_2$ molecules for
the $\Delta_{\textit{II}}$, $\Delta_{\textit{ee}}$ and $\Delta_{\textit{Ie}}$ configurations
shown as insets. The 3D ground state PESs (dotted lines) have been taken from Ref.~\onlinecite{3DH2}.}
\label{BOA_PES_CASES:fig}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[scale=0.3]{Fig3}
\end{center}
\caption{
(Color online) Optical spectra for the (a) H$_2^+$ and (b) H$_2$ molecules obtained by classically
fixing the ions to their equilibrium positions (BOA) and evolving the ions
(ED) for masses $M_\textrm{H}$ and $M_{\textrm{p}}\times 10^4$ with minimum ionic separations (a) $\Delta_{\textit{II}}=a_0$ (b) $\Delta_{\textit{II}} = \Delta_{\textit{ee}} = \sqrt{2}a_0$
and electron-ion separations (a,b) $\Delta_{\textit{Ie}}=a_0$ shown as insets. Evolution of the difference in dipole moment $\Delta d$ between ED for $M_{\textrm{H}}$ and BOA in milliDebye is shown as an inset of (a).
}
\label{ED_VS_BOA_SPECTRA:fig}
\end{figure}
In Fig.~\ref{BOA_PES_CASES:fig},
we show how the H$_2^+$ and H$_2$ BOA ground state PES change
as a function of the ionic separation $\sqrt{X^2 + \Delta_{\textit{II}}^2}$
for each configuration shown in Fig.~\ref{EPS_VALUES:fig}.
\begin{table}
\begin{ruledtabular}
\caption{H$_2^+$ and H$_2$ ground state PES fitted ground state energies
$E_{0}(X_{\textit{eq}})$ and positions $\sqrt{X_{\textit{eq}}^2 + \Delta_{\textit{II}}^2}$
obtained from a harmonic fit around $X_{\textit{eq}}$ for the configurations shown in Fig.~\ref{EPS_VALUES:fig}.}
\label{PARAMETERS}
\begin{tabular}{cccccc}
Species & $\Delta_{\textit{II}}$& $\Delta_{\textit{Ie}}$& $\Delta_{\textit{ee}} $& $E_{0}(X_{\textit{eq}})$&
$\sqrt{X_{\textit{eq}}^2 + \Delta_{\textit{II}}^2}$\\
& ($a_0$) &($a_0$) &($a_0$) & (eV) & ($\AA$)\\
\hline
\multirow{4}{*}{H$_2^+$}& 1& 0.5 & --- &
-45.757&
0.5627\\
& 0.5& 1 & --- &
-21.431&
1.3510\\
& 1& 1& --- &
-21.969&
1.2697\\
& 2 & 1 & --- &
−26.759&
1.0584\\
\hline
\multirow{4}{*}{H$_2$}
& $\frac{1}{3}$& $\frac{1}{3}$; $\frac{2}{3}$& 1 &
-60.022&
0.7146\\
& $\sqrt{3}$& 1& 1 &
-45.193&
0.9166\\
& 1& 1& $\sqrt{3}$&
-44.790&
0.9004\\
& $\sqrt{2}$& 1& $\sqrt{2}$ &
-45.856&
0.8241\\
\end{tabular}
\end{ruledtabular}
\end{table}
The PES fitted minimum energies at $X_{\textit{eq}}$, $E_{0}(X_{\textit{eq}})$
and positions $\sqrt{X_{\textit{eq}}^2 + \Delta_{\textit{II}}^2}$ are shown in Table \ref{PARAMETERS}
for the H$_2^+$ and H$_2$ molecules with the configurations shown in
Fig.~\ref{EPS_VALUES:fig}.
The ground state PESs (dotted black lines in Fig.~\ref{BOA_PES_CASES:fig} and taken from Ref. \onlinecite{3DH2}) have been
obtained by solving the stationary Schr\"{o}dinger equation in 3D using basis sets within the BOA.
Here, the electronic and ionic positions were allowed to vary in all spatial directions.
The overall shape of these 3D PES is reproduced qualitatively by configurations (b) and (c) for H$_2^+$ and (g) for H$_2$ from Fig.~\ref{EPS_VALUES:fig}.
The experimental bond lengths of H$_2^+$ and H$_2$ are $2a_0$ \cite{BOND_LENGTH_H2+}
and $\sqrt{2}a_0$ \cite{3DH2}, respectively. The equilibrium distance is best reproduced by configuration (d) for
H$_2^+$ and (g) for H$_2$ from Fig.~\ref{EPS_VALUES:fig}.
The Hamiltonian for configuration (g) for H$_2$ in Fig.~\ref{EPS_VALUES:fig} (b) is not invariant under electron exchange. Yet, we still consider this configuration, as the H$_2$ configurations which are invariant under electron exchange (Fig.~\ref{EPS_VALUES:fig}(e,f,i)), yield PES that differ qualitatively from the 3D PES, as shown in Fig. \ref{BOA_PES_CASES:fig} (b).
The ions sometimes undergo a strong inter-ionic repulsion for
larger and small $X$, depending on the initial configuration.
For the strongly repulsive configurations for small $X$, the ions are farther apart because the
repulsion between the ions is stronger than the attraction between the ions and electrons.
For the strongly attractive configurations for larger $X$, the ions are closer together because the
repulsion between the ions is weaker than the attraction between the ions and electrons.
For the latter configurations, more energy is required to dissociate the molecule.
For H$_2^+$, when $\Delta_{\textit{Ie}}=a_0$, the potential becomes less repulsive for small $X$ as $\Delta_{\textit{II}}$ increases.
However, when $\Delta_{\textit{Ie}}=0.5a_0$, the potential becomes strongly attractive for larger $X$.
For H$_2$, the potential becomes strongly repulsive for small $X$ for
the linear configuration (g). When $\Delta_{\textit{II}}=a_0$ and $\Delta_{\textit{Ie}} \neq a_0$, configuration (d)
in Fig.~\ref{EPS_VALUES:fig}, the ground state PES is unbound.
As the electrons are necessarily very close to each other ($\Delta_{\textit{ee}} = \frac{1}{3}a_0$) when the molecule is bound, their repulsion forces the dissociation of the H$_2$ molecule into two isolated stabler H atoms.
For this reason we will disregard this configuration from hereon.
\begin{figure}[!t]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[scale=0.3]{Fig4}
\end{center}
\caption{
(Color online) Absorption spectra obtained from a classical BOA (dashed lines) or quantum mechanical QMI (solid lines) treatment of the ions of an (a--d) H$_2^+$ molecule with configurations (a) $\Delta_{\textit{II}} = \frac{1}{2}a_0; \Delta_{\textit{Ie}} = a_0$ (green), (b) $\Delta_{\textit{II}} = 2a_0; \Delta_{\textit{Ie}} = a_0$ (blue), (c) $\Delta_{\textit{II}} = a_0; \Delta_{\textit{Ie}} = a_0$ (red), and (d) $\Delta_{\textit{II}} = a_0; \Delta_{\textit{Ie}} = \frac{1}{2}a_0$ (orange) or an (e--h) H$_2$ molecule with configurations (e) $\Delta_{\textit{II}} = a_0; \Delta_{\textit{Ie}} = a_0; \Delta_{\textit{ee}} = \frac{1}{3}a_0$ (violet), (f) $\Delta_{\textit{II}} = \sqrt{2}a_0; \Delta_{\textit{Ie}} = a_0; \Delta_{\textit{ee}} = \sqrt{2}a_0$ (blue), (g) $\Delta_{\textit{II}} = \sqrt{3}a_0; \Delta_{\textit{Ie}} = a_0; \Delta_{\textit{ee}} = a_0$ (red), and (h) $\Delta_{\textit{II}} = \frac{1}{3}a_0; \Delta_{\textit{Ie}} = \frac{1}{3},\frac{2}{3}a_0; \Delta_{\textit{ee}} = a_0$ (green) shown as insets.
Dotted vertical lines denote the energies $\varepsilon_i$ of the unoccupied electronic levels $\varphi_i^{X_{\textit{eq}}}(\xi)$ relative to the ground state energy $\varepsilon_0$ for each configuration at $X_{\textit{eq}}$.
}
\label{EXACT_CHANGE_EPS:fig}
\end{figure}
In Fig.~\ref{ED_VS_BOA_SPECTRA:fig} we compare the H$_2^+$ and H$_2$ optical spectra we obtain by classically fixing and letting the ions evolve according to ED in time from $X_{\textit{eq}}$. Essentially, including the classical movement of the ions hardly changes the spectra. However, new peaks appear before the first electronic excitation for both the H$_2^+$ and H$_2$ molecule, at 1 and 12~eV, respectively. For H$_2^+$, the new peak corresponds to the frequency of the ionic zero-point motion around $X_{\textit{eq}}$, which vanishes for large masses ($M_{\mathrm{p}}\times10^4$) because heavy ions hardly move around $X_{\textit{eq}}$. On the other hand, H$_2$'s higher energy peak does \textit{not} vanish for large $M$. Due to its width, the ED and fixed ion spectra do not overlap completely. We explain the origin of this peak in Sec.~\ref{data_analysis:sec}.
The inset of Fig.~\ref{ED_VS_BOA_SPECTRA:fig}(a) illustrates the time-dependent effects of zero-point motion. In the BOA the ionic center of mass $X_{\textrm{CM}_1}$ is fixed, so the electron can only oscillate about it. ED (and QMI), however, allow ionic motion, so long as the global center of mass $X_{\textrm{CM}_2}$ is conserved. The increasing difference $\Delta d$ between the ED and BOA dipole moments thus demonstrates the ions move, e.g., $\Delta d(24\unit{fs})\sim 0.7\unit{mD}$.
In Fig.~\ref{EXACT_CHANGE_EPS:fig}, we show how a quantum mechanical treatment of the ions (QMI) affects the optical absorption spectra for H$_2^+$ and H$_2$ molecules in the configurations of $\Delta_{\textit{II}}$, $\Delta_{\textit{ee}}$ and $\Delta_{\textit{Ie}}$ shown in Fig.~\ref{EPS_VALUES:fig}. We see that new features emerge in the spectra when the ions are treated quantum mechanically instead of classically. The peaks are broadened, become asymmetric, and their amplitudes and energies change as a function of the initial configuration and charge of the molecule. In particular, comparing the BOA and QMI spectra shown in Fig.~\ref{EXACT_CHANGE_EPS:fig}, we find that each peak splits into a lower and higher energy contribution. Depending on the energy shift and amplitude of each contribution, these can appear as separate peaks or shoulders in the spectra. The shoulders are giving rise to an asymmetry that can be seen for almost every peak. These quantum features are not as strong for the neutral $\mathrm{H}_2$ homonuclear diatomic molecule, regardless of the initial configuration. With a classical description of the ions, we do not obtain these quantum mechanical features in the optical spectra.
Generally, we find treating the ions quantum mechanically substantially affects both the peak positions and widths in the absorption spectra for most of the configurations considered. For inter-ionic potentials which are less repulsive (Fig.~\ref{EXACT_CHANGE_EPS:fig}(b) and (e)), the line shape of the QMI peaks is narrowed, and approaches the fixed-ion at $X_{\textit{eq}}$ limit. For potentials which are attractive for larger $X$ (Fig.~\ref{EXACT_CHANGE_EPS:fig}(d) and (f)), all the QMI peaks are blue shifted with respect to the fixed-ion at $X_{\textit{eq}}$ spectra. In this case, the peak excitation energies are larger because more energy is required to excite these transitions.
\subsection{Mass dependency}\label{mass_dependence:sec}
To provide a quantitative analysis of the differences between a classical (BOA/ED) or quantum (QMI) treatment of the ions, we will compare the total ground state energies and the peak positions and widths in the absorption spectra as we vary the ionic mass over seven orders of magnitude.
The accuracy of the static BOA and ED calculations can be understood from a perturbation theory argument in terms of the small parameter $\kappa = (m_e/M)^{\textrm{\sfrac{1}{4}}}$, defined as the ratio between the ionic and electronic displacement \cite{BOA_VALIDITY_ONE_FOURTH}, where $X = X_{\textit{eq}} + \kappa \zeta$. We illustrate this in detail in Appendix \ref{AppendixB}.
To test the accuracy of the BOA and ED approximations, we first compare the BOA and ED ground state electron-ion eigenvalues to those obtained from QMI. We expect that the BOA and ED should be accurate around the minimum of the ground state PES, as the exact eigenvalues of the electron-ion problem can be interpreted in terms of the ionic vibrational levels for the electronic ground state PES. As discussed in Sec.~\ref{BOA_molecules:sec}, the ionic contribution comes from the ground state level of a quantum harmonic oscillator where the mass
is included via $\omega_I$.
The ground state electron-ion eigenvalue for H$_2^+$ and H$_2$ molecules whose motion is confined in one direction is given by
\begin{equation}
\varepsilon_{\textit{gs}}^{\textit{BOA}} \approx \varepsilon^{(0)} + \varepsilon^{(2)}(\kappa^2) + \mathrm{O}(\kappa^4),
\end{equation}
where $\varepsilon^{(0)}$ and $\varepsilon^{(2)}$ correspond
to the electronic and ionic motion eigenvalues,
and $\varepsilon^{(1)}$ and $\varepsilon^{(3)}$ are equal to zero by symmetry (see Appendix~\ref{AppendixB}).
The first order correction to the ground state energy for the full electron-ion problem using the BOA/ED is the term of fourth order in $\kappa$.
\begin{figure
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[scale=0.3]{Fig5}
\end{center}
\caption{
(Color online) Difference in ground state total energy between QMI and BOA/ED approaches $\Delta \varepsilon_{\textit{gs}}$ in eV versus the electron-ion mass ratio $m_e/M$ for H$_2^+$ ($\Delta_{\textit{II}}=\Delta_{\textit{Ie}}=a_0$; {\color{red}{$\medcirc$}}) and H$_2$ ($\Delta_{\textit{II}}= \Delta_{\textit{ee}} = \sqrt{2}a_0$ and $\Delta_{\textit{Ie}}=a_0$; {\color{blue}{$\blacksquare$}}). Solid lines are a power law fit $a \left(m_e/M\right)^b$.}
\label{FIT_BOA_ERROR:fig}
\end{figure}
To check the dependence of the static ground state eigenvalue accuracy of the BOA and ED
approaches, on the electron-ion mass ratio, we use the following power law relation
\begin{equation}\label{BOA_ERROR_1D:eqn}
\varepsilon_{\textit{gs}}^{\textit{BOA/ED}} - \varepsilon_{\textit{gs}}^{\textit{QMI}} \approx a\kappa^{4b} = a {\left(\frac{m_e}{M}\right)}^b.
\end{equation}
Note that most of the molecules used in this analysis are fictitious because we do not change the charge of the ions as explained in Sec.~\ref{model_1D:sec}, except for H, D, and T, as these have a positive electric charge of $e$.
\begin{table}[!t]
\begin{ruledtabular}
\caption{M$_2^+$ ground state eigenvalues obtained from diagonalization of the QMI approach $\varepsilon_{\textit{gs}}^{\mathrm {QMI}}$, and ground state harmonic BOA and ED $\varepsilon_{\textit{gs}}^{ \mathrm {\textit{BOA/ED}}}$ eigenvalues obtained from a harmonic fit around the minimum of the ground state PES. We show these results for different ionic masses $M$ and $\Delta_{\textit{II}}=\Delta_{\textit{Ie}}=a_0$.}
\label{TABLE_ERRORS}
\begin{tabular}{cccc}
$M$& $\varepsilon_{\textit{gs}}^{\mathrm {QMI}}$(eV)& $\varepsilon_{\textit{gs}}^{ \mathrm {\textit{BOA/ED}}}$ (eV)& $\frac{m_e}{M}$ \\
\hline
$\upmu$&
-21.703395&
-21.697297&
0.004836\\
H&
-21.970225&
-21.969323&
0.000545\\
D&
-22.009642&
-22.009272&
0.000272\\
T&
-22.027041&
-22.026787&
0.000182\\
Li&
-22.053541&
-22.053420&
0.000079\\
Na&
-22.076626&
-22.076580&
0.000023\\
K&
-22.083189&
-22.083160&
0.000014\\
\end{tabular}
\end{ruledtabular}
\end{table}
\begin{table}[!t]
\begin{ruledtabular}
\caption{M$_2$ ground state eigenvalues obtained by electron-ion QMI diagonalization $\varepsilon_{\textit{gs}}^{\mathrm {QMI}}$, and ground state harmonic BOA and ED $\varepsilon_{\textit{gs}}^{\mathrm {\textit{BOA/ED}}}$ vibration levels obtained from a harmonic fit around the minimum of the ground state PES. We show these results for different electron-ion mass ratios $\frac{m_e}{M}$ and $\Delta_{\textit{II}}=\sqrt{2}a_0$ and $\Delta_{\textit{Ie}}=a_0$.}
\label{TABLE_ERRORS_H2}
\begin{tabular}{cccc}
$M$&
$\varepsilon_{\textit{gs}}^{\mathrm {QMI}}$ (eV)&
$\varepsilon_{\textit{gs}}^{\mathrm {\textit{BOA/ED}}}$ (eV)&
$\frac{m_e}{M}$ \\\hline
$\upmu$&
-45.621166&
-45.440564&
0.004836\\
H&
-45.739425&
-45.722955&
0.000545\\
D&
-45.772460&
-45.763130&
0.000272\\
T&
-45.786936&
-45.779126&
0.000182\\
Li&
-45.810176&
-45.807442&
0.000079\\
Na&
-45.831319&
-45.830529&
0.000023\\
K&
-45.837552&
-45.837070&
0.000014\\
\end{tabular}
\end{ruledtabular}
\end{table}
Fitting the ground state error from Eq.~(\ref{BOA_ERROR_1D:eqn}) to the data in Tables \ref{TABLE_ERRORS} and \ref{TABLE_ERRORS_H2}, we obtain a power law of $b\approx0.92(2)$ and $b\approx1.05(2)$ for the BOA/ED approaches, as shown in Fig.~\ref{FIT_BOA_ERROR:fig}. This means the BOA and ED energy expression gives the correct total ground state energy of the full electron-ion problem up to fourth order in $\kappa$.
\begin{figure
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[scale=0.3]{Fig6}
\end{center}
\caption{
(Color online) QMI electron-ion absorption spectra for a positively charged homonuclear diatomic molecule with ionic mass $M$ of e, $\upmu$, H, D, T, Li, Na, K, or $10^4$p in the configuration (a) $\Delta_{\textit{II}}=\frac{1}{2}a_0; \Delta_{\textit{Ie}}=a_0$ or (b) $\Delta_{\textit{II}}= \Delta_{\textit{Ie}}=a_0$. Dotted vertical lines denote the energies $\varepsilon_i$ of the unoccupied electronic levels $\varphi_i^{X_{\textit{eq}}}(\xi)$ (shown in blue as insets) relative to the energy $\varepsilon_0$ of the ground state electronic level $\varphi_0^{X_{\textit{eq}}}(\xi)$ (shown in green as insets) for each configuration. Note that the spectra have been scaled with decreasing mass for clarity. Portions of (b) have been adapted from Ref.~\onlinecite{Lorenzo}.
}
\label{CROSS_BOA:fig}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[scale=0.3]{Fig7}
\end{center}
\caption{
(Color online) QMI electron-ion absorption spectra for a neutral homonuclear diatomic molecule with ionic mass $M$ of H, D, T, or Li in the configuration $\Delta_{\textit{II}}=\frac{1}{3}a_0$, $\Delta_{\textit{ee}}=a_0$, and $\Delta_{\textit{Ie}}=\frac{1}{3};\frac{2}{3}a_0$. Dotted vertical lines denote the energies $\varepsilon_i$ of the unoccupied electronic levels $\varphi_i^{X_{\textit{eq}}}(\xi,x)$ (shown as insets) relative to the ground state energy $\varepsilon_0$ for each configuration. Note that the spectra have been scaled with decreasing mass for clarity.
}
\label{CROSS_BOA_H2_PLANAR:fig}
\end{figure}
In Figs.~\ref{CROSS_BOA:fig} and \ref{CROSS_BOA_H2_PLANAR:fig} we show how the absorption spectra depends on the mass for the H$_2^+$ and H$_2$ configurations for which the overall PES shape is closest to that from the 3D treatment in Ref.~\onlinecite{3DH2}. Specifically, we analyze the H$_2^+$ configurations shown in Figs.~\ref{EPS_VALUES:fig}(b) and (c), and the H$_2$ configuration shown in Fig.~\ref{EPS_VALUES:fig}(g).
In Fig.~\ref{CROSS_BOA:fig}(b) we see that in the large mass limit ($M \approx 10^4\times M_{\mathrm{p}}$), the QMI spectra exhibits even to odd transitions which are allowed by the symmetry of the electronic wavefunctions $\varphi_i(\xi)$, shown as insets. For every allowed transition in Figs.~\ref{CROSS_BOA:fig} and \ref{CROSS_BOA_H2_PLANAR:fig}, we have a red shifted and a blue shifted contribution.
The position of the first, second and fourth peaks in Fig.~\ref{CROSS_BOA:fig}(a) and (b) ($\omega_1$, $\omega_2$, and $\omega_4$) are red-shifted and the third and fifth peaks ($\omega_3$ and $\omega_5$) are blue-shifted with respect to the fixed-ion at $X_{\textit{eq}}$ spectra. As the mass increases, all peaks tend towards the fixed-ion at $X_{\textit{eq}}$ limit. In Fig.~\ref{CROSS_BOA_H2_PLANAR:fig} all the peaks are red-shifted, although the second peak is also a classical peak as shown in Fig.~\ref{EXACT_CHANGE_EPS:fig}(h), which disappears for smaller masses.
\begin{figure
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=\columnwidth]{Fig8}
\end{center}
\caption{
(Color online) Electronic wave functions $\varphi_i^{X_{\textit{eq}}}(\xi,x)$ for $i=0,\ldots,10$ of an H$_2$ molecule in the configuration $\Delta_{\textit{II}} = \frac{1}{3}a_0; \Delta_{\textit{ee}} = a_0$.
}
\label{WFS_H2:fig}
\end{figure}
In Fig.~\ref{WFS_H2:fig}, we show the symmetry of the occupied electronic wavefunction $\varphi_0(\xi,x)$ and the first ten unoccupied electronic wavefunctions $\varphi_i(\xi,x)$ for H$_2$. Only transitions to unoccupied electronic wavefunctions that are even functions of $x$ and odd functions of $\xi$ should contribute to the absorption spectra by symmetry, i.e. $\langle \varphi_i(\xi,x)|\hat \xi|\varphi_0(\xi,x)\rangle > 0$. However, Fig.~\ref{EXACT_CHANGE_EPS:fig}(h) shows there is an absorption peak in the BOA spectra for the $\varphi_0\rightarrow \varphi_3$ transition, despite $\varphi_3^{X_{\textit{eq}}}(\xi,x)$ being an odd function of $x$, as shown in Fig.~\ref{WFS_H2:fig}. This is because the Hamiltonian for the configuration $\Delta_{\textit{II}} = \frac{1}{3}a_0$, $\Delta_{\textit{ee}} = a_0$, and $\Delta_{\textit{Ie}} = \frac{1}{3};\frac{2}{3}a_0$ is not invariant under electron exchange.
From the ED spectra in Fig.~\ref{ED_VS_BOA_SPECTRA:fig}(b), we also have an additional peak at a lower energy. When the ions are fixed, this peak is less intense than when they are allowed to evolve. In this case, the peaks' energy is given by the first excited transition ($\varphi_0\rightarrow\varphi_1$) as seen from the energy of the vertical dotted frozen ion lines in Fig.~\ref{EXACT_CHANGE_EPS:fig}(f). However, the unoccupied wavefunction $\varphi_1(\xi,x)$ is even with respect to $\xi$ and odd with respect to $x$, as shown in Fig.~\ref{WFS_H2:fig}. This suggests such a transition should initially be parity forbidden.
To calculate the dipole moment for H$_2$ and different $M$, we only kick our molecules along $\xi$, as shown in Sec.~\ref{spectra:sec}. When calculating the spectra in the BOA, the ionic coordinate is frozen at $X_{\textit{eq}}$ and cannot evolve in time. The electronic coordinate $x$ forms part of the integral, but can evolve in time. When we apply a kick along $\xi$, the distribution of the charge in the molecule will change with time. The electrons and ions will feel the charge distribution of the other particles. Thus, the electronic coordinate $x$ can evolve in time, although this effect is not taken into account when the dipole moment is calculated. Essentially, the ($\xi,x$) basis is rotated by the kick to a ($\xi',x'$) basis.
As $\xi$ is time dependent within ED, the $\varphi_1(\xi',x')$ rotated basis has a mixture of even and odd components in both $x$ and $\xi$, removing the parity constraint on the $\varphi_0\rightarrow\varphi_1$ transition.
As shown in Fig.~\ref{ED_VS_BOA_SPECTRA:fig}(b), this extra parity forbidden peak is not as intense as the other peaks which are allowed by symmetry. This peak is rather weak because the electrons and ions are close to each other, but not on the same plane, for the configuration shown in Fig. \ref{EPS_VALUES:fig}(i). Additionally, as the $\varphi_0\rightarrow\varphi_1$ transition is initially forbidden by symmetry for both $x$ and $\xi$, the rotated contribution with even and odd symmetry in $x$ and $\xi$ is small.
\begin{figure}
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=\columnwidth]{Fig9}
\end{center}
\caption{(Color online) Evolution of the QMI electron-ion dipole moment $d$ in milliDebye with time $t$ after the initial ``kick'' in fs for ionic masses $M$ of $\upmu$, H, D, Ti, Li, Na, K, or (upper inset) $10^4$p of a positively charged homonuclear diatomic molecule in the configuration $\Delta_{\mathrm{II}}= \Delta_{\textit{Ie}}=a_0$. (lower inset) After 20~fs, the amplitude has decreased by a factor of one million.
}\label{Multipoles:fig}
\end{figure}
Overall, heavier ions have narrower peaks as we approach the classical limit. Figure \ref{Multipoles:fig} presents this effect in the time domain. Energy transfer between the excited electrons and the ionic system is already clearly seen after a few fs. Even in the large-mass limit ($M_p\times 10^4$) energy transfer is clearly evident. Oscillatory behavior, including beat frequencies, is still present 24~fs after the initial kick.
When the ions evolve quantum mechanically, the electrons can transfer part of their dipole moment to the ions. The amplitude of the dipole moment thus decreases at different rates depending on the ionic mass. This process will take longer as the mass of the ions increases and it becomes more difficult to displace the ions. For very large ion masses, the interaction with the electronic motion becomes nearly elastic. This allows the electrons to oscillate back and forth without the influence of any external ionic displacements. Since the widths of the absorption peaks are proportional to the energy transfer from the electrons to the ions, we expect the widths to scale as the electron-ion mass ratio to the one fourth, as discussed in Section~\ref{BOA:sec} and Appendix~\ref{AppendixB}.
\subsection{Spectral lineshape}\label{data_analysis:sec}
To quantify the width and energy of the peaks in the spectra, we have employed both Gaussian
\begin{equation}\label{gaussian:eqn}
\sum_{i=1}^{3} I_i e^{-\frac{(\omega-\omega_i)^2}{2\sigma_i^2}}
\end{equation}
and Lorentzian
\begin{equation}\label{lorentzian:eqn}
\sum_{i=1}^{3} I_i \frac{(\Gamma_{i}/2)^2}{{(\omega-\omega_i)}^2 + (\Gamma_{i}/2)^2}.
\end{equation}
functions. Here $I_{i}$ is the intensity, $\omega_{i}$ the position, $\sigma_{i}$ the standard deviation, and $\Gamma_{i}$ the full width at half maximum of the first three peaks of the QMI spectra.
\begin{figure}
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[scale=0.3]{Fig10}
\end{center}
\caption{
(Color online) QMI electron-ion absorption spectra for an H$_2^+$ molecule in the configuration $\Delta_{\textit{II}}=\Delta_{\textit{Ie}}=a_0$ obtained with (red solid lines) and without (green dashed lines) imposing symmetry in $X$ on the ionic wave functions. Lorentzian (blue dotted lines) and Gaussian (black solid line) fits to the first three peaks of the spectra are also provided.
}
\label{H2+_FITS:fig}
\end{figure}
From Fig.~\ref{H2+_FITS:fig}, in which we show the QMI spectra for H$_2^+$, we clearly see that the tails of the peaks of the QMI spectra are Gaussian. Moreover, the three peaks can only be fitted simultaneously with Gaussian functions, as the Lorentzian fit to the first peak decays so slowly that the second and third peaks are completely obscured. Furthermore, the ionic wave packet on the ground state PES is a solution of a harmonic eigenvalue problem and thus should have a Gaussian line shape. This means the spectral line shape arises from the shape of the PES, rather than the coupling between ionic vibrations of the molecule.
Note that the width of the fixed-ion at $X_{\textit{eq}}$ spectra in Fig.~\ref{ED_VS_BOA_SPECTRA:fig} is due to the artificial damping introduced in the spectra. The electronic transitions should be delta-like functions, but are convoluted with a Gaussian function to plot the spectra (see Eqs.~(\ref{FT:eqn}) and (\ref{THIRD_ORDER_POL:eqn})). However, the widths in the QMI spectra are physical, and the Gaussian line shape is due to the electron-electron coupling via the ionic displacements.
To ensure that the optical spectra we obtain is only affected by the external perturbation $K$, we have used a symmeterized initial wavefunction
\begin{equation}
\psi_{\textit{symm}}(X,\xi) = \frac{\psi(X,\xi) + \psi(-X, \xi)}{\sqrt{2}}.
\end{equation}
Thus, we always excite from a ground state which is symmetric in the ionic coordinate. In Fig.~\ref{H2+_FITS:fig}, we show that symmetrizing the wavefunction does not change the calculated optical absorption spectrum. This means that we already obtain a nearly symmetric ground state starting configuration from the stationary Schr\"{o}dinger equation (\ref{MB_indep:eqn}). However, the data shown in Fig.~\ref{CROSS_BOA:fig}(b) has been symmetrized for every $M$.
\subsection{Model}\label{MODEL:sec}
To explain why a quantum treatment of the ions has such a strong effect on the absorption spectra for H$_2^+$, we propose a simple two level model. Using this model, we will show how the observed QMI spectral peaks and widths can be extracted from the electronic BOA eigenenergies $\varepsilon_i$ at equilibrium $X_{\textit{eq}}$ of the ground state through the electron-ion mass ratio $m_e/M$.
When an external kick is applied, a charge separation is induced in the molecule which will oscillate back and forth with time. As discussed in Sec.~\ref{spectra:sec}, the applied kick is simply a transformation of the ground state wavefunctions, through the application of a phase factor $e^{-i K\xi}$, to eigenstates of the system with momentum $K$ along the direction of motion. This leads to a
transition dipole moment between an initial and a final electronic state.
The electronic wavefunctions with even indices $\varphi_{2i}$ are even functions of $\xi$, while the electronic wavefunctions with odd indices $\varphi_{2i+1}$ are odd functions of $\xi$. This parity of the electronic wavefunctions means that the transition dipole moment is zero for transitions from the ground state to even unoccupied states, i.e., $\langle \varphi_{2i+2}|\hat \xi | \varphi_0\rangle = 0$. Essentially,
optical transitions $\varphi_0\rightarrow\varphi_{2i+2}$ are forbidden so long as $\varphi_{2i+2}$ is an even function of $\xi$.
This is the case when the ions are treated classically. In fact, Figs.~\ref{EXACT_CHANGE_EPS:fig}(a--d) clearly show that the peaks in the absorption spectra obtained from a classical BOA treatment are always aligned with the energies of odd-parity unoccupied electronic levels $\varepsilon_{2i+1}$, i.e., the Franck-Condon transitions $\varphi_0\rightarrow\varphi_{2i+1}$.
When the ions are treated quantum mechanically, every allowed transition is split into red and blue shifted contributions, with the shifts increasing as the mass decreases. The level splitting we observe in Fig.~\ref{CROSS_BOA:fig} is reminiscent of level hybridization.
This motivates us to employ a simple two-level model \cite{Hammer1995211, MowbrayJPCL2013} to describe the energies and widths of the QMI peaks.
To do so, for each odd-parity unoccupied electronic level $\varphi_{2i+1}$ at $\varepsilon_{2i+1}$, we artificially introduce a level at $\widetilde{\varepsilon}_{2i+1}$ to which it couples.
As mentioned in Section~\ref{BOA:sec} and Appendix~\ref{AppendixB}, the ratio between the vibrational and electronic energies, $E_{\textit{vib}}/E_{\textit{elec}}$, scales as the square of the ratio between the ionic and electronic displacement $(\delta/a_0)^2$ \cite{BOA_VALIDITY_ONE_FOURTH}. This means the ionic displacement scales as the electron-ion mass ratio to the one fourth $\delta \approx (m_e/M)^{\textrm{\sfrac{1}{4}}}$. Since the probability of coupling is directly related to the quantum ionic displacement, we expect the coupling between the energy levels to scale as $\delta \approx (m_e/M)^{\textrm{\sfrac{1}{4}}}$. Further, the width of the peaks in the absorption spectra should also be related to the ionic displacement. We thus assume the coupling between the energy levels is proportional to the ionic displacement $\delta \sim M^{-\sfrac{1}{4}}$, i.e, $\alpha M^{-\sfrac{1}{4}}$ where $\alpha$ is the constant of proportionality.
The resulting two-level Hamiltonian $\left[\begin{array}{cc}
\varepsilon_{2i+1} & \frac{\alpha}{M^{\textrm{\sfrac{1}{4}}}}\\
\frac{\alpha}{M^{\textrm{\sfrac{1}{4}}}} & \widetilde{\varepsilon}_{2i+1}
\end{array}\right]$ has a solution for the $\varepsilon_{2i+1}$ allowed peak's energy of
\begin{equation}
\omega_{2i, 2i+1} \approx \frac{\varepsilon_{2i+1} + \widetilde{\varepsilon}_{2i+1}}{2} - \sqrt{\left(\frac{\varepsilon_{2i+1} - \widetilde{\varepsilon}_{2i+1}}{2}\right)^2 + \left(\frac{\alpha}{M^{\textrm{\sfrac{1}{4}}}}\right)^2}\label{omega1:eqn}.
\end{equation}
This two-level model yields two peaks that are lower and higher in energy, through level repulsion. As the mass decreases, ionic displacements become larger. This leads to a greater coupling. The coupling between the energy levels will be larger when the mass decreases and the energy separation between the two coupling energy levels will also increase.
\begin{figure*}[!t]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[scale=0.3]{Fig11}
\end{center}
\caption{
(Color online) Two-level model fits to the first four peaks in the QMI electron-ion absorption spectra $\omega_{i}$ for a positively charged diatomic molecule with ionic mass $M$ in the configuration $\Delta_{\textit{Ie}} = a_0$ and $\Delta_{\textit{II}} = \frac{1}{2}a_0$ ({\color{Green}{$\medbullet$}}) or $\Delta_{\textit{II}} = a_0$ ({\color{red}{$\medcirc$}}). Level coupling has the form $\alpha (m_e/M)^{\textrm{\sfrac{1}{4}}}$, and the decoupled levels are obtained from the ground state electronic eigenenergies $\varepsilon_i$. Gray regions denote a $\pm 0.1$~eV estimated accuracy.
}
\label{H2+_ALL_PEAKS:fig}
\end{figure*}
\begin{figure}[!t]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[scale=0.3]{Fig12}
\end{center}
\caption{
(Color online) Two-level model fits to the first three peaks in the QMI electron-ion absorption spectra $\omega_{i}$ for a neutral diatomic molecule with ionic mass $M$ in the configuration $\Delta_{\textit{Ie}} = \frac{1}{3};\frac{2}{3}a_0$, $\Delta_{\textit{II}} = \frac{1}{3}a_0$, and $\Delta_{\textit{ee}} = a_0$ ({\color{Green}{$\blacksquare$}}). Level coupling has the form $\alpha (m_e/M)^{\textrm{\sfrac{1}{4}}}$, and the decoupled levels are obtained from the ground state electronic eigenenergies $\varepsilon_i$. Gray regions denote a $\pm 0.1$~eV estimated accuracy.
}
\label{PLANAR_H2_ALL_PEAKS:fig}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[scale=0.3]{Fig13}
\end{center}
\caption{
(Color online) Full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the Gaussian fits ($\mathrm{FWHM}=2\sqrt{2}\sigma_i$) to the first and third peaks of the absorption spectra for a positively charged homonuclear diatomic molecule with ionic mass $M$ of $\upmu$, H, D, T, Li, Na, or K versus the fourth root of the electron-ion mass ratio $(m_e/M)^{\mathrm{\textrm{\sfrac{1}{4}}}}$ in the configuration $\Delta_{\textit{Ie}} = a_0$ and $\Delta_{\textit{II}} = \frac{1}{2}a_0$ ({\color{Green}{$\medbullet$}}) or $\Delta_{\textit{II}} = a_0$ ({\color{red}{$\medcirc$}}). Black lines are linear fits to each peak for both configurations. Gray regions denote a $\pm 0.1$~eV estimated accuracy.
}
\label{WIDTH_H2+:fig}
\end{figure}
In Figs.~\ref{H2+_ALL_PEAKS:fig} and \ref{PLANAR_H2_ALL_PEAKS:fig} we use the two-level model to fit the calculated QMI peaks for various ionic masses $M$. Specifically, we employ Eqs.~(\ref{omega1:eqn}) to fit $\omega_1$, $\omega_2,$ and $\omega_3$ for H$_2^+$ and H$_2$. In general, the calculated peak positions are within $0.1$~eV of the two-level model fit, which is also the expected accuracy of such calculations. In each case, we find the coupling between the transitions has a constant of proportionality of $\alpha \approx 11$~eV. Furthermore, the artificial level $\widetilde{\varepsilon}_{3} \approx 23.5$~eV for both configurations of H$_2^+$.
For H$_2^+$, we find the first peak depends on $M^{-\textrm{\sfrac{1}{2}}}$, since \(\alpha^2/M^{\textrm{\sfrac{1}{2}}} \ll \widetilde{\varepsilon}_{1} - \varepsilon_1\approx\) 9.7~eV. In other words,
\begin{equation}
\omega_1 \approx \varepsilon_1 - \frac{\alpha^2/M^{\textrm{\sfrac{1}{2}}}}{\widetilde{\varepsilon}_{1} - \varepsilon_1}\label{approxomega1:eqn},
\end{equation}
where $\widetilde{\varepsilon}_1 \approx 20$~eV.
For the second and third peaks, so long as $\varepsilon_3-\widetilde{\varepsilon}_3 \ll 2\alpha/M^{\sfrac{1}{4}}$, we may further approximate the peaks by
\begin{equation}
\begin{aligned}
\omega_{2,3}&\approx \frac{\varepsilon_3+\widetilde{\varepsilon}_{3}}{2} \pm \left[\frac{\alpha}{M^{\textrm{\sfrac{1}{4}}}} + \frac{(\varepsilon_3 - \widetilde{\varepsilon}_3)^2M^{\sfrac{1}{4}}}{8\alpha}\right],
\\&\approx \frac{\varepsilon_3+\widetilde{\varepsilon}_{3}}{2} \pm \frac{\alpha}{M^{\textrm{\sfrac{1}{4}}}}.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
As we see in Fig.~\ref{H2+_ALL_PEAKS:fig}, this is indeed the case for the second and third peaks in the absorption spectra, \(\omega_2\) and \(\omega_3\), of H$_2^+$ in the configuration $\Delta_{\textit{Ie}} = a_0$ and $\Delta_{\textit{II}} = \frac{1}{2}a_0$, as $\varepsilon_3 - \widetilde{\varepsilon}_{3} \approx 0.4$~eV.
Essentially, all the peak positions in the QMI spectra are fit using only two parameters, the artificial level's energy $\widetilde{\varepsilon}_{2i+1}$, and the coupling constant $\alpha$. However, we are not always able to decouple the two peaks' red and blue shifted contributions because of their overlap due to their finite width. This is particularly true for H$_2$. As a result, we have fewer data points for the H$_2$ peaks, as shown in Fig.~\ref{PLANAR_H2_ALL_PEAKS:fig}, reducing the reliability of the fit to Eq. \ref{omega1:eqn}.
In Fig.~\ref{WIDTH_H2+:fig}, we also show that the width of the first and third peaks for the configurations
shown in Fig.~\ref{EPS_VALUES:fig} (b) and (c) scale as the electron-ion mass ratio to the one fourth,
i.e. $\textrm{FWHM} \approx (m_e/M)^{\textrm{\sfrac{1}{4}}}$, as expected from our model.
The FWHM for the first peak has a larger constant of proportionality than the third peak,
but the widths for both configurations may be fit simultaneously.
Altogether, this demonstrates the predictive power of the simple two-level model
for describing the QMI spectra as a function of the ionic mass.
\section{Conclusions}\label{conclusions:sec}
We have shown that additional features may appear in the linear response spectra of charged H$_2^+$ and neutral H$_2$ homonuclear diatomic molecules when the ionic motion is described quantum mechanically. Such features are strongly dependent on the molecules' configuration, i.e., the shape of the PES. The widely used classical ionic motion BOA and ED approaches fail to describe such features. We also demonstrate that these features may be understood using a predictive two-level model. These results demonstrate how for light atoms, the quantum nature of the ions may play an important role when describing absorption processes.
\section{Acknowledgements}\label{acknowledgements:sec}
The authors thank Angel Rubio, Stefan Kurth and Lorenzo Stella for useful discussions. We acknowledge financial support from the European Research Council Advanced Grant DYNamo (ERC-2010-AdG-267374), Spanish Grants (FIS2013-46159-C3-1-P and PIB2010US-00652), and Grupo Consolidado UPV/EHU del Gobierno Vasco (IT578-13). A. C.-U. acknowledges financial support from the Departamento de Educaci\'on, Universidades e Investigaci\'on del Gobierno Vasco (Ref. BFI-2011-26) and DIPC.
|
\section{Introduction}
Trapped, ultracold gases offer a versatile way to investigate quantum many-body physics. Well-isolated from their surroundings, they can be controlled to cover a wide parameter space, giving access to regimes beyond the reach of other condensed matter experiments \cite{Levin12}. Confinement reduces the dimensionality of a gas when the atoms have insufficient energy to reach excited quantum levels. For example, pancake-shaped traps can produce a two-dimensional (2D) gas, while a cigar-shaped trap can confine it to one dimension (1D) \cite{Bagnato91}. While the static properties of atomic Bose-Einstein condensates (BEC) are generally well understood \cite{Pethick02} the dynamical behaviour remains an active area of study \cite{Polkovnikov11}. In the early days of atomic BEC, oscillations of the shape were studied, primarily to establish the superfluidity of the condensate, and it was noticed that these oscillations were damped \cite{Jin96, Mewes96} at a rate that depended strongly on the temperature \cite{Jin97}. An explanation for this was offered by Landau damping \cite{Liu97, Pitaevskii1997}, in which a low-energy excitation of the condensate is dissipated into the thermal cloud by scattering phonons from lower to higher energy. Fedichev \textit{et al.} \cite{Fedichev98a, Fedichev98b} extended this theory to the case of a trapped gas and showed that the damping is determined predominantly by the condensate boundary region, resulting in a different damping rate from that of a
spatially homogeneous gas. This theory found reasonable agreement with \cite{Jin97}, and similar agreement was found with the measured damping rate of the scissors mode of oscillation \cite{Marago01}.
Subsequently, Stamper-Kurn \textit{et al.} \cite{StamperKurn98} excited a cigar-shaped condensate to move rigidly along its length, out of phase with its thermal component. They saw that this second-sound motion \cite{Zaremba98} was damped, and noted that collisions neglected in the Landau theory might play a role because the hydrodynamicity -- the thermal cloud collision rate divided by the oscillation frequency -- was not small. The damping of this mode was also noted in \cite{Ferlaino02} and was studied extensively by Meppelink \textit{et al.} \cite{Meppelink09}. They found qualitative agreement with \cite{Fedichev98a} at low values of hydrodynamicity, with a strongly growing discrepancy at higher values, demonstrating the breakdown of the Landau theory at high density.
Oscillations of long, thin condensates in the 1D regime \cite{Moritz03} have very different behaviour, with no damping \cite{Kinoshita06} unless corrugation is added to the trapping potential \cite{Fertig05}. This raises the question of how the damping evolves from the 3D rate, through the crossover regime where no analytic theory currently exists, to a complete absence of damping in 1D. Oscillation frequencies have been measured in this crossover regime \cite{Kottke05, Fang14}, but not the damping rate. In this article, we measure the damping rate for dipole oscillations of a condensate in the crossover regime as a function of temperature, and compare our results with measurements of \cite{Meppelink09} and the theory of \cite{Fedichev98a, Fedichev98b}. We find that the oscillations in our experiment persist for longer than expected for a 3D gas and propose that this is the consequence of suppressed radial excitations due to the tight transverse confinement of the atoms.
\section{Condensate oscillations in a thermal background}
We produce highly elongated, finite temperature condensates \cite{Yuen14} with the apparatus illustrated in figure\,\ref{fig:apparatus}. A magneto-optical trap (MOT) cools and collects $^{87}$Rb atoms a few millimetres away from the surface of an atom chip \cite{Reichel99}. The MOT is then turned off, and the atoms are transferred to a Ioffe-Pritchard trap approximately \SI{110}{\micro\metre} from the surface of the chip \cite{Sewell2010, Baumgartner2010}. The magnetic trapping field is produced by current in a Z-shaped wire on the chip, with its central section along $z$, together with an external bias field along $x$. The high magnetic field gradient near the centre of the Z-wire gives tight radial ($x$, $y$) confinement with a harmonic oscillation frequency of $\omega_{\rho}/2\pi = 1.4~\mathrm{kHz}$. Axial ($z$) confinement is produced by the currents in the ends of the Z-wire and in the end wires (figure\,\ref{fig:apparatus}), giving an axial frequency of $3~\mathrm{Hz}$.
We cool the trapped gas further by forced evaporation, using an rf field to flip the spins of the most energetic atoms so that they are ejected from the trap \cite{ketterle_evaporative_1996}. By sweeping the escape energy down to a few kilohertz above the bottom of the trap, we produce an almost pure BEC of approximately $10^4$ atoms at a temperature of $\sim150$\,nK. Minor defects in the chip wire cause the current to meander slightly from side to side, producing small undulations of the trapping potential that make local minima along the $z$ axis up to a microkelvin in depth \cite{Fortagh02,Jones03}. We adjust the centre of the axial trap so that the BEC forms in one of these, which is harmonic over a small region, with a characteristic frequency of $\omega_z/2\pi = 10~\mathrm{Hz}$. The condensed atoms are confined to that region, while the higher-energy atoms in the thermal component of the gas explore a larger axial range, and experience an anharmonic potential.
\begin{figure}
\centering
\includegraphics[width= 0.6 \textwidth]{figure1.eps}
\caption{Diagram of the apparatus. Cold $^{87}$Rb atoms are delivered from an LVIS source \cite{Sinclair05} to a reflection-magneto-optical trap formed on an atom chip. The atoms are passed to a long, thin magnetic trap formed by a current in the Z-wire together with a uniform bias field along $x$. After evaporative cooling, these form a BEC (dark blue). A brief ac current in the end wire excites the condensate to oscillate along $z$, as indicated by the green arrows. After some time, the cloud is released and allowed to fall for $2\,$ms under gravity along $y$, before being imaged along $x$ by absorption of a laser beam, shown in red. }
\label{fig:apparatus}
\end{figure}
When the rf field is turned off, the atoms warm up at approximately $50~\mathrm{nK/s}$, presumably due to noise in the apparatus. To counteract this, we leave the rf field on, so that atoms above some fixed energy are able to leave the trap. Over a few milliseconds the cloud comes to equilibrium at the temperature where the heating is balanced by the evaporative cooling. We select a desired temperature in the range $150-310$~nK by adjusting the rf frequency. The temperature remains fixed over the next 500~ms, while the number of trapped atoms decreases, typically by a few percent.
\begin{figure*}[t]
\centering
\footnotesize{ \input{figure2} }
\caption{Density profiles of ultracold atom clouds and oscillations of the condensate. (a) Axial column density profiles measured at three temperatures. Red dots: 155(3)\,nK. Blue squares: 251(3)\,nK. Green triangles: 305(3)\,nK. Solid lines: fits using theory described in the text, which takes into account the irregular potential. Dotted lines: profiles of the thermal component of the cloud, determined by the same fit to theory. (b-d) Condensate oscillations for the same three temperatures. Points show the centre of mass of the condensed component after a period of free oscillation. Lines show the fits to the damped sinusoid in (\ref{eq:dampedSin}). These fits give (b) $\gamma=2.0(6)\,\mbox{s}^{-1}$ at $155$\,nK. (c) $\gamma=3.8(5)\,\mbox{s}^{-1}$ at $251$\,nK. (d) $\gamma=5.7(1.2)\,\mbox{s}^{-1}$ at $305$\,nK.
}
\label{fig:measurements}
\end{figure*}
Our aim is to observe the oscillation of condensed atoms moving through the thermal cloud in order to determine the damping rate as the system equilibrates. To resonantly excite axial condensate oscillations, we drive an oscillating current in one of the end wires at $10~\mathrm{Hz}$ for two periods. After this time, the condensate's centre of mass is left oscillating with an initial amplitude of \SI{\sim12}{\micro\metre}. The thermal atoms are largely unaffected because they explore the region outside the local potential minimum and are therefore not resonant with this drive.
We allow the condensate to oscillate through the thermal background for a time $t$, before switching off the trap and imaging the cloud to determine the condensate's centre of mass. By increasing $t$ in $12.5\,$ms steps over a total of $400\,$ms, we build up a data set of the damped oscillation. We repeat this process for clouds at different temperatures which we influence by setting the frequency of the rf field as described above. Thus, we observe how the system damps as a function of temperature.
\section{Measuring the temperature, condensate centre of mass, and damping rate}
We determine the temperature of the gas, and centre of mass of the condensate from an absorption image.
To image the atom cloud, we release it from the trap (gravity is up in figure\,\ref{fig:apparatus}), wait for 2~ms, illuminate it with resonant laser light and view the absorption along $x$ using a CCD camera. This image is then integrated over $y$ to obtain the one-dimensional axial number density profile of the cloud, $n(z)= \int \mathrm{d}x \,\mathrm{d}y\,n(\mathbf{r})$. The data points in figure\,\ref{fig:measurements}(a) show axial density profiles measured at three different temperatures. At the lowest temperature (red dots), the atoms are nearly all in the condensate, with very little signal in the broad thermal background, whereas the profile at the highest temperature (green triangles) has a clearly visible thermal population on either side of the cloud.
Our analysis of the cloud profile builds on the method of \cite{Naraschewski1998}. The trapping potential is well described by $U(\mathbf{r})={1 \over 2} m\omega_{\rho}^2 \rho^2+V(z)$, where $\rho$ is the radial displacement, and $V(z)$ is the potential on axis, including the irregularity caused by the meandering current. We determine $V(z)$ from the axial density distribution of cold, non-condensed clouds as described in \cite{Jones2004}. Knowing $U(\mathbf{r})$, we estimate the number density profile of the condensate, $n_{c}(\mathbf{r})$, using the Thomas-Fermi approximation. The profile of the thermal component is calculated by integrating the Bose-Einstein distribution over the effective potential $2 g n_{c}(\mathbf{r}) + U(\mathbf{r})$, where the first term is the mean-field energy of thermal atoms inside the condensate. The cloud is then allowed to evolve freely for $2\,$ms to account for the period of free fall (though we find that this makes no significant difference to the axial profile). We fit this theoretical cloud to the measured density profile $n(z)$ in order to determine the temperature, the position of the condensate, and the peak condensate number density $n_{c}(0)$. We note that the Thomas Fermi approximation is not well satisfied in our 3D/1D condensates, but we find from simulations \cite{FuturePaper} that this method still yields accurate temperatures, while the peak condensate density is underestimated, typically by 10\%. These fits, shown in figure\,\ref{fig:measurements}(a) as solid lines, are in excellent agreement with the clouds we observe. For the three clouds that are plotted in figure\,\ref{fig:measurements}(a), we determined the temperatures $155(3)$, $251(3)$ and $305(3)$\,nK. The dotted lines show the thermal cloud density within the condensed regions.
In our experiments, the temperature fluctuates by less than $10$\,nK from one realisation to the next -- mainly because of fluctuations in the initial number of magnetically trapped atoms -- and drifts by less than $\pm20$\,nK over an hour. The position of the BEC is very stable, fluctuating from shot to shot by less than \SI{1}{\micro\metre}, which we associate with mechanical instability of the camera and mirror mounts. It does not drift significantly over an hour.
Figures\,\ref{fig:measurements}(b-d) show plots of the condensate centre of mass oscillations we measure at each of the three temperatures used in figure\,\ref{fig:measurements}(a). It takes approximately 30 minutes to collect the data points for one plot. We have analysed 33 such time sequences, covering a range of temperatures from $150$\,nK up to $310$\,nK. In each case, the motion is well described by the exponentially damped sinusoid,
\begin{equation}
z(t) = A \mathrm{e}^{-\gamma t} \mathrm{sin}\left( \omega t + \phi \right) + C,
\label{eq:dampedSin}
\end{equation}
where $A$, $\gamma$, $\omega$, $\phi$ and $C$ are fit parameters. Parameters $A$, $\phi$ and $C$ are independent of temperature, and $\omega$ increases only slightly (by 10\%) over this range of temperatures. By contrast, $\gamma$ depends significantly on temperature, increasing by a factor of three.
\section{Results and discussion}
In figure\,\ref{fig:results} we plot the damping rate $\gamma$ as a function of the temperature, each point being the result of fitting one oscillation curve. The temperature assigned to one point is the mean of the $\sim30$ temperatures measured in that curve, and this has a standard error smaller than the symbols in the plot. A vertical error bar indicates the $1\sigma$ uncertainty in $\gamma$ for each fit. We note that the dissipated energy of the oscillation has no significant influence on the temperature, because it corresponds to a negligible rise of $\sim2\,$nK.
\begin{figure}[t]
\centering
\includegraphics[width =0.6 \columnwidth]{figure3.eps}
\caption{Damping rate measured as a function of temperature for the oscillation of our highly elongated BEC. Each point is derived by fitting the oscillation of 32 cloud images to (\ref{eq:dampedSin}). Vertical error bars show the $1\sigma$ uncertainty in $\gamma$. Horizontal error bars are smaller than the symbol. Solid line: a least squares fit of (\ref{eq:gammatheory}) to our data gives $A_{\nu}=3.53(15)$. Shading indicates the standard error from the fit. Dashed line: damping rate given by (\ref{eq:gammatheory}) taking $A_{\nu}=7$, as observed with the 3D condensate of \cite{Meppelink09, Straten14}.}
\label{fig:results}
\end{figure}
Damping rates measured in 3D BEC oscillation experiments have generally been consistent with the Landau damping theory \cite{Jin96, Mewes96, Jin97, Fedichev98a, Fedichev98b, Marago01, Meppelink09}. For a 3D trapped cloud making small oscillations at a frequency $\omega$ close to the trap frequency, this theory gives the damping rate as (see equation (18) of Ref.~\cite{Fedichev98a})
\begin{equation} \label{eq:gammatheory}
\Gamma_{\nu} =
A_{\nu}\, \omega \frac{k_{\mathrm B} T}{g\sqrt{n_c(0)}}
a^{3/2} \,.
\end{equation}
Here $A_{\nu}$ is a numerical coefficient that depends on which collective mode $\nu$ is excited, $a$ is the s-wave scattering length, $n_c(0)$ is the peak number density of the condensate and $g=4 \pi \hbar^2 a/m$ is the usual nonlinear coupling parameter (the $\mu$ of \cite{Fedichev98a} is the same as our $g n_c(0)$). At each temperature our measurements give values for the number density and oscillation frequency, from which we construct empirical functions $n_c(0;T)$ and $\omega(T)$. Using these functions, we fit (\ref{eq:gammatheory}) to our data with $A_{\nu}$ as the only free parameter. The result is $A_{\nu}=3.53(15)$. The solid line in figure\,\ref{fig:results} shows this best fit, with the shaded region covering the standard deviation. This theory describes our data well, giving a reduced $\chi^2$ of $0.90$.
The measurements of Meppelink \textit{et al.} in \cite{Meppelink09} involve the same mode as our experiment, but the comparison of their damping at low hydrodynamicity with (\ref{eq:gammatheory}) yields a coefficient $A_{\nu}=7$ \cite{Meppelink09, Straten14}. The essential difference between these two experiments is in the dimensionality of the trapped gas. In \cite{Meppelink09} the chemical potential was at least 28 times higher than the radial excitation energy, placing their cloud firmly in the 3D regime. By contrast, the chemical potential of our cloud is aproximately twice the quantum of radial excitation, which places it in the crossover regime between 3D and 1D. The temperature dependence of our result indicates that the same Landau damping idea still applies, even in this crossover regime, but the density of states, which enters through the use of Fermi's golden rule to obtain (\ref{eq:gammatheory}), should be modified to account for the quantisation of the radial excitations \cite{Yuen14}. Physically, the thermal excitations in this case are more likely to be along $z$, in which case they cannot contribute to the damping, and $A_{\nu}$ is correspondingly reduced.
The Utrecht experiment \cite{Meppelink09} measured the damping over a wide range of hydrodynamicity. Following in the spirit of \cite{Meppelink09}, the red squares in figure\,\ref{fig:hydro} plot the ratio of their measured damping rates $\gamma$ to the $\Gamma_{\nu}$ of (\ref{eq:gammatheory}), with $A_{\nu}=7$ \cite{Straten14}, plotted versus hydrodynamicity. At low hydrodynamicity, the ratio approaches 1 in their data, and 0.5 in our data (blue circles), as discussed above. Further, the Utrecht data shows an increase in this ratio as the hydrodynamicity increases, indicating that collisional processes, not incorporated in the model of (\ref{eq:gammatheory}), play an important role in damping this dipole mode. Figure\,\ref{fig:hydro} shows that such an increase does not occur in our case. We suggest that this too is a consequence of the discrete radial excitation spectrum, which although broadened at higher collision rates, remains discrete far above a hydrodynamicity of 5 and therefore suppresses the ability of thermal-thermal collisions to contribute to the damping.
\begin{figure}[t]
\centering
\includegraphics[width =0.6 \columnwidth]{figure4.eps}
\caption{Ratio of measured damping rates $\gamma$ to the $\Gamma_{\nu}$ of (\ref{eq:gammatheory}), taking $A_{\nu}=7$, plotted versus hydrodynamicity \cite{Straten14}. Red squares: data of \cite{Meppelink09}, showing an increase in this ratio with increasing hydrodynamicity. Blue circles: our data, showing a suppressed value of $A_{\nu}$ and no excess damping up to a hydrodynamicity of 5.}
\label{fig:hydro}
\end{figure}
Following \cite{Meppelink09}, we have taken the hydrodynamicity in figure\,\ref{fig:hydro} to be $ n_{\mathrm{th}} \langle v_{\mathrm{rel}}\rangle \sigma / \omega_z$,
where $n_{\mathrm{th}}=N_{\mathrm{th}} m^{3/2} \omega_{\rho}^2 \omega_z / (4 \pi k_B T)^{3/2}$ is the average thermal atom number density experienced by thermal atoms in the harmonic trap, according to the Maxwell Boltzmann distribution. The quantity $\langle v_{\mathrm{rel}}\rangle=4 \left[ k_B T/(\pi m) \right]^{1/2}$ is the mean relative speed between thermal atoms, and $\sigma=8 \pi a^2$ is the s-wave scattering cross-section. In future, it would be better to derive the thermal density from the Bose-Einstein distribution in the harmonic trap, which fixes the mean density at $0.55\, \zeta(\frac{3}{2})(2\pi m k_B T)^{3/2}/ h^3$, $\zeta$ being the Reimann zeta function. This makes no difference to our conclusions here, but will be important for any future quantitative study of the corrections to Landau damping.
In all the damping experiments, the energy in the initial coherent motion is very large compared with $\hbar \omega$. Indeed, the ratio of these is generally greater than the number of atoms in the cloud. It is therefore interesting that the analytical theory reproduces the measured 3D damping rates, because the theory assumes a Bogoliubov mode of energy $\hbar \omega$ that is weakly excited. The agreement between experiment and theory indicates that the damping rate calculated for weak excitations is still applicable when the excitation is strong.
Collective excitations have been simulated numerically using the method of Zaremba, Nikuni and Griffin \cite{Zaremba99}, which makes Hartree-Fock and semi-classical approximations to derive a mean field equation for the condensate coupled to a Boltzmann equation for the thermal cloud. Simulations by Jackson and Zaremba \cite{Jackson01, Jackson02, Jackson02b}, have proved to be in good agreement with the 3D experiments \cite{Marago01, Jin97, Chevy02} respectively.
However, in the 3D/1D cross-over where $\hbar \omega_{\rho} \sim \mu \sim k_B T$, the quantisation of the radial excitations is not well approximated by a semi-classical treatment, as we have shown here. A fully quantum treatment may be possible using the perturbative approach of \cite{Pitaevskii1997, Guilleumas03}, but we are not aware of any such treatment in the 3D/1D crossover regime. Our results provide a point of reference for such simulations. In future we hope to vary the transverse width of our trap in order to elucidate further the damping behaviour in this dimensional crossover region.
\section*{Acknowledgments}
We are indebted to Peter van der Straten, Eugene Zaremba, Gora Shlyapnikov and Nathan Welch for valuable discussions. We acknowledge the expert technical support of Jon Dyne, Steve Maine, and Valerius Gerulis. This work was supported by the European FP7 project AQUTE, by the UK EPSRC and by the Royal Society.
\section*{References}
|
\section{Introduction}
Let $K$ be a complete discrete valuation field of mixed characteristics $(0,p)$
with perfect residue field.
We take a system of $p$-power roots $(\pi_n)_{n\ge 0}$
of a uniformizer $\pi$ of $K$
such that $\pi_0=\pi$ and $\pi^p_{n+1}=\pi_n$.
We denote by $G_K$ and $G_{K_n}$
absolute Galois groups of $K$ and $K_n:=K(\pi_n)$, respectively.
For applications to interesting problems such as modularity liftings,
it is useful to study an integral version of Fontaine's $p$-adic Hodge theory,
which is called integral $p$-adic Hodge theory.
It is important in integral $p$-adic Hodge theory
to construct ``good'' linear algebraic data
which classify
$G_K$-stable $\mbb{Z}_p$-lattices
in semi-stable, or crystalline, $\mbb{Q}_p$-representations of $G_K$
with Hodge-Tate weights in $[0,r]$.
Nowadays various such linear algebraic data are constructed;
for example, so called Fontaine-Laffaille modules,
Wach modules and Breuil modules.
It is one of the obstructions for the use of these algebraic data that
we can not use them without restrictions
on the absolute ramification index $e$ of $K$ and (or) $r$.
In \cite{Li3},
based on a Kisin's insight \cite{Ki} for
a classification of lattices in semi-stable representations,
Tong Liu defined notions of
$(\vphi,\hat{G})$-modules
and weak
$(\vphi,\hat{G})$-modules.
He constructed
a contravariant fully faithful functor
$\hat{T}$ from the category
of weak
$(\vphi,\hat{G})$-modules of height $\le r$
into the the category of free $\mbb{Z}_p$-representations of $G_K$.
It is the main theorem of {\it loc.\ cit.}
that, without any restriction on $e$ and $r$,
$\hat{T}$ induces an anti-equivalence between
the category of $(\vphi,\hat{G})$-modules of height $\le r$ and
the category of lattices in semi-stable $\mbb{Q}_p$-representations of $G_K$
with Hodge-Tate weights in $[0,r]$.
In the end of {\it loc. cit.},
he posed the following question:
\begin{question}
\label{question}
What is the essential image of the functor $\hat{T}$ on {\it weak}
$(\vphi,\hat{G})$-modules?
\end{question}
\noindent
He showed that, if a representation of $G_K$ corresponds to
a weak
$(\vphi,\hat{G})$-module of height $\le r$, then
it is semi-stable over $K_n$ for some $n\ge 0$
and has Hodge-Tate weights in $[0,r]$.
However, the converse does not hold in general.
In this paper, we give an answer to Question \ref{question}.
Denote by $m_0$ the maximum integer
such that $K$
contains $p^{m_0}$-th roots of unity.
For any non-negative integer $n$,
we denote by $\mcal{C}^r_n$
the category of free $\mbb{Z}_p$-representations $T$ of $G_K$
which satisfy the following property;
there exists a semi-stable $\mbb{Q}_p$-representation $V$ of $G_K$
with Hodge-Tate weights in $[0,r]$
such that
$T\otimes_{\mbb{Z}_p}\mbb{Q}_p$ is isomorphic to $V$ as representations of $G_{K_n}$.
Our main result is as follows.
\begin{theorem}
\label{Main1}
The essential image of
the functor $\hat{T}$ is $\mcal{C}^r_{m_0}$.
\end{theorem}
\noindent
Therefore,
we conclude that $\hat{T}$ induces an anti-equivalence between
the category of weak
$(\vphi,\hat{G})$-modules of height $\le r$
and the category $\mcal{C}^r_{m_0}$.
The crucial part of our proof is to show the relation
$$
\mcal{C}^r_{m_0}\subset \mcal{C}^r\subset \mcal{C}^r_m
$$
where
$\mcal{C}^r$ is
the essential image of
the functor $\hat{T}$ and
$m$ is the maximum integer
such that the maximal unramified extension of $K$
contains $p^m$-th roots of unity (cf.\ Lemma \ref{Lem:Main1'}).
We have two keys for our proof of this statement.
The first one is Proposition \ref{Main2},
which gives a relation between weak $(\vphi,\hat{G})$-modules
and ``finite height'' representations.
For the proof, following the method of Liu's arguments of \cite{Li3} and \cite{Li4},
we construct certain linear data which classifies
lattices in potentially semi-stable representations.
This is a direct generalization of the main result of \cite{Li3}
(the idea for our proof is essentially due to Liu's previous works).
The second one is Proposition \ref{Thm2};
it says
that the $G_{K_n}$-action of a finite height representation of $G_K$
which is semi-stable over $K_n$
extends to a $G_K$-action which is semi-stable over $K$.\\
\begin{acknowledgments}
The author thanks Akio Tamagawa
who gave him useful advice in the proof of Lemma \ref{lastlemma}
in the case where $p$ is odd and $m_0=0$.
This work is supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 25$\cdot$173.
\end{acknowledgments}
\noindent
{\bf Notation :}
For any topological group $H$,
a free $\mbb{Z}_p$-representation of $H$
(resp.\ a $\mbb{Q}_p$-representation of $H$)
is a finitely generated free $\mbb{Z}_p$-module equipped
with a continuous $\mbb{Z}_p$-linear $H$-action
(resp.\ a finite dimensional $\mbb{Q}_p$-vector space equipped
with a continuous $\mbb{Q}_p$-linear $H$-action).
We denote by $\mrm{Rep}_{\mbb{Z}_p}(H)$
(resp.\ $\mrm{Rep}_{\mbb{Q}_p}(H)$)
the category of them.
For any field $F$, we denote by $G_F$ the absolute Galois group of $F$
(for a fixed separable closure of $F$).
\section{Preliminary}
In this section, we recall some results on Liu's $(\vphi,\hat{G})$-modules
and related topics.
Throughout this paper, let $p\ge 2$ be a prime number.
Let $K$ be a complete discrete valuation field of mixed characteristics $(0,p)$
with perfect residue field $k$.
Let $L$ be a finite extension of $K$.
Take a uniformizer $\pi_L$ of $L$ and
a system of $p$-power roots $(\pi_{L,n})_{n\ge 0}$
of $\pi_L$ such that $\pi_{L,0}=\pi_L$ and
$\pi^p_{L,n+1}=\pi_{L,n}$.
We denote by $k_L$ the residue field of $L$.
Put $L_n=L(\pi_{L,n}), L_{\infty}=\cup_{n\ge 0}L_n$
and define $\hat{L}$ to be the Galois closure of $L_{\infty}$
over $L$.
We denote by $H_L$ and $\hat{G}_L$ the Galois group of $\hat{L}/L_{\infty}$ and $\hat{L}/L$,
respectively.
We denote by $K^{\mrm{ur}}$ and $L^{\mrm{ur}}$ maximal unramified extensions of $K$ and $L$, respectively.
Note that we have $L^{\mrm{ur}}=LK^{\mrm{ur}}$.
Let $R=\plim \cO_{\overline{K}}/p$,
where $\cO_{\overline{K}}$ is
the integer ring of $\overline{K}$
and the transition maps are
given by the $p$-th power map.
We write
$\underline{\pi_L}:=(\pi_{L,n})_{n\ge 0}\in R$.
Let $\mfS_{L}:=W(k_L)[\![u_L]\!]$ be the formal power series ring with indeterminate $u_L$.
We define a Frobenius endomorphism $\vphi$ of $\mfS_L$ by $u_L \mapsto u_L^p$
extending the Frobenius of $W(k_L)$.
The $W(k_L)$-algebra embedding $W(k_L)[u_L]\hookrightarrow W(R)$
defined by $u_L\mapsto [\underline{\pi_L}]$
extends to $\mfS_L\hookrightarrow W(R)$
where $[\ast]$ is the Teichm\"uller representative.
We denote by $\mrm{Mod}^r_{/\mfS_L}$ the category of
$\vphi$-modules $\mfM$ over $\mfS_L$ which satisfy the following:
\begin{itemize}
\item $\mfM$ is free of finite type over $\mfS_L$; and
\item $\mfM$ is of height $\le r$
in the sense that
$\mrm{coker}(1\otimes \vphi\colon \mfS_L\otimes_{\vphi,\mfS_L}\mfM\to \mfM)$ is killed by $E_L(u_L)^r$.
\end{itemize}
\noindent
Here, $E_L(u_L)$ is the minimal polynomial of $\pi_L$ over $W(k_L)[1/p]$,
which is an Eisenstein polynomial.
We call objects of this category {\it Kisin modules of height $\le r$ over $\mfS_L$}.
We define a contravariant functor
$T_{\mfS_L}\colon \mrm{Mod}^r_{/\mfS_L}\to \mrm{Rep}_{\mbb{Z}_p}(G_{L_{\infty}})$
by
$$
T_{\mfS_L}(\mfM):=
\mrm{Hom}_{\mfS_L,\vphi}(\mfM, W(R))
$$
\noindent
for an object $\mfM$ of $\mrm{Mod}^r_{/\mfS_L}$.
Here a $G_{L_\infty}$-action on
$T_{\mfS_L}(\mfM)$ is given by
$(\sigma.g)(x)=\sigma(g(x))$
for $\sigma\in G_{L_\infty}, g\in T_{\mfS_L}(\mfM), x\in \mfM$.
\begin{proposition}[{\cite[Corollary 2.1.4 and Proposition 2.1.12]{Ki}}]
\label{Kisin}
The functor
$T_{\mfS_L}\colon \mrm{Mod}^r_{/\mfS_L}\to \mrm{Rep}_{\mbb{Z}_p}(G_{L_{\infty}})$
is exact and fully faithful.
\end{proposition}
Let $S_L$ be the $p$-adic completion of $W(k_L)[u_L, \frac{E_L(u_L)^i}{i!}]_{i\ge 0}$
and endow $S_L$ with the following
structures:
\begin{itemize}
\item a continuous $\vphi_{W(k_L)}$-semilinear Frobenius $\vphi\colon S_L\to S_L$
defined by $u_L\mapsto u_L^p$.
\item a continuous $W(k_L)$-linear derivation $N\colon S_L\to S_L$
defined by $N(u_L)=-u_L$.
\item a decreasing filtration
$(\mrm{Fil}^iS_L)_{i\ge 0}$ on $S_L$.
Here $\mrm{Fil}^iS_L$
is the $p$-adic closure of the ideal generated
by $\frac{E_L(u_L)^j}{j!}$ for all $j\ge i$.
\end{itemize}
The embedding $\mfS_L\hookrightarrow W(R)$
defined above extends to
$\mfS_L\hookrightarrow S_L\hookrightarrow A_{\mrm{cris}}$
and $S_L[1/p]\hookrightarrow B^+_{\mrm{cris}}$.
We take
a primitive $p$-power root $\zeta_{p^n}$ of unity for $n\ge 0$
such that $\zeta^p_{p^{n+1}}=\zeta_{p^n}$.
We set
$\underline{\e}:=(\zeta_{p^n})_{n\ge 0}\in R$
and $t:=-\mrm{log}([\underline{\e}])\in A_{\mrm{cris}}$.
For any integer $n\ge 0$,
let $t^{\{n\}}:=t^{r(n)}\gamma_{\tilde{q}(n)}(\frac{t^{p-1}}{p})$
where $n=(p-1)\tilde{q}(n)+r(n)$ with $\tilde{q}(n)\ge 0,\ 0\le r(n) <p-1$
and $\gamma_i(x)=\frac{x^i}{i!}$
the standard divided power.
Now we denote by $\nu\colon W(R)\to W(\overline{k})$
a unique lift of the projection $R\to \overline{k}$,
which extends to a map
$\nu \colon B^+_{\mrm{cris}}\to W(\overline{k})[1/p]$.
For any subring $A\subset B^+_{\mrm{cris}}$,
we put
$I_+A=\mrm{Ker}(\nu\ \mrm{on}\ B^+_{\mrm{cris}})\cap A$.
We define a subring $\mcal{R}_L$, containing $S_L$,
of $B^+_{\mrm{cris}}$
as below:
$$
\mcal{R}_L:=\left\{\sum^{\infty}_{i=0} f_it^{\{i\}}\mid f_i\in S_L[1/p]\
\mrm{and}\ f_i\to 0\ \mrm{as}\ i\to \infty\right\}.
$$
Furthermore, we define $\whR_L:=\mcal{R}_L\cap W(R)$.
We see that $S_L$ is not $G_L$-stable under the action of $G_L$ in $B^+_{\mrm{cris}}$.
However, $\mcal{R}_L, \whR_L, I_+\mcal{R}_L$ and $I_+\whR_L$ are $G_L$-stable.
Furthermore, they
are stable under Frobenius in $B^+_{\mrm{cris}}$.
By definition $G_L$-actions on them
factor through $\hat{G}_L$.
For an object $\mfM$ of $\mrm{Mod}^r_{/\mfS_L}$,
the map $\mfM\to \whR_L\otimes_{\vphi,\mfS_L} \mfM$
defined by $x\mapsto 1\otimes x$
is injective.
By this injection,
we often regard $\mfM$ as a $\vphi(\mfS_L)$-stable submodule of
$\whR_L\otimes_{\vphi,\mfS_L} \mfM$.
\begin{definition}
\label{def:Liu}
A {\it weak $(\vphi,\hat{G}_L)$-module of height $\le r$ over $\mfS_L$}
is a triple $\hat{\mfM}=(\mfM,\vphi,\hat{G}_L)$ where
\begin{itemize}
\item[(1)] $(\mfM,\vphi)$ is an object of $\mrm{Mod}^r_{/\mfS_L}$,
\item[(2)] $\hat{G}_L$ is an $\whR_L$-semilinear continuous $\hat{G}_L$-action on
$\whR_L\otimes_{\vphi,\mfS_L}\mfM$,
\item[(3)] the $\hat{G}_L$-action commutes with $\vphi_{\whR_L}\otimes \vphi_{\mfM}$, and
\item[(4)] $\mfM\subset (\whR_L\otimes_{\vphi,\mfS_L} \mfM)^{H_L}$.
\end{itemize}
Furthermore, we say that $\hat{\mfM}$ is
a {\it $(\vphi,\hat{G}_L)$-module of height $\le r$ over $\mfS_L$}
if $\hat{\mfM}$ satisfies the additional condition;
\begin{itemize}
\item[(5)] $\hat{G}_L$ acts on $\whR_L\otimes_{\vphi,\mfS_L} \mfM/I_+\whR_L(\whR_L\otimes_{\vphi,\mfS_L} \mfM)$
trivially.
\end{itemize}
We always regard $\whR_L\otimes_{\vphi,\mfS_L} \mfM$ as a
$G_L$-module via the projection $G_L\twoheadrightarrow \hat{G}_L$.
We denote by ${}_{\mrm{w}}\Mod^{r,\hat{G}_L}_{/\mfS_L}$
(resp.\ $\Mod^{r,\hat{G}_L}_{/\mfS_L}$)
the category of
weak $(\vphi,\hat{G}_L)$-modules of height $\le r$ over $\mfS_L$
(resp.\ the category of $(\vphi,\hat{G}_L)$-modules of height $\le r$ over $\mfS_L$).
\end{definition}
\noindent
We define a contravariant functor
$\hat{T}_L\colon {}_{\mrm{w}}\Mod^{r,\hat{G}_L}_{/\mfS_L}\to
\mrm{Rep}_{\mbb{Z}_p}(G_L)$
by
$$
\hat{T}_L(\hat{\mfM})=
\mrm{Hom}_{\whR_L,\vphi}(\whR_L\otimes_{\vphi, \mfS_L} \mfM, W(R))
$$
for an object $\hat{\mfM}=(\mfM,\vphi,\hat{G}_L)$ of ${}_{\mrm{w}}\Mod^{r,\hat{G}_L}_{/\mfS_L}$.
Here a $G_L$-action on
$\hat{T}_L(\hat{\mfM})$ is given by
$(\sigma.g)(x)=\sigma(g(\sigma^{-1}x))$
for $\sigma\in G_L, g\in \hat{T}_L(\hat{\mfM}),
x\in \whR_L\otimes_{\vphi, \mfS_L} \mfM$.
\begin{remark}
\label{importantremark}
We should remark that
notations $L_n,\mfS_L, \whR_L, \Mod^{r,\hat{G}_L}_{/\mfS_L},\dots $ above
{\it depend on the choices of a uniformizer $\pi_L$ of $L$ and a system $(\pi_{L,n})_{n\ge 0}$
of $p$-power roots of $\pi_L$}.
Conversely,
if we fix the choice of $\pi_L$ and $(\pi_{L,n})_{n\ge 0}$,
such notations are uniquely determined.
\end{remark}
\begin{theorem}
\label{Thm:Liu}
(1) (\cite[Theorem 2.3.1 (1)]{Li3})
Let $\hat{\mfM}=(\mfM,\vphi,\hat{G}_L)$ be an object of
${}_{\mrm{w}}\Mod^{r,\hat{G}_L}_{/\mfS_L}$.
Then the map
$$
\theta\colon T_{\mfS_L}(\mfM) \to \hat{T}_L(\hat{\mfM})
$$
defined by $\theta(f)(a\otimes x):=a\vphi(f(x))$
for $a\in \whR_L$ and $x\in \mfM$,
is an isomorphism of representations of $G_{L_\infty}$.
\noindent
(2) (\cite[Theorem 2.3.1(2)]{Li3})
The contravariant functor $\hat{T}_L$ gives an anti-equivalence
between the following categories:
\begin{itemize}
\item[--] The category of $(\vphi,\hat{G}_L)$-modules of height $\le r$ over $\mfS_L$.
\item[--] The category of $G_L$-stable $\mbb{Z}_p$-lattices in semi-stable
$\mbb{Q}_p$-representations with
Hodge-Tate weights in $[0,r]$.
\end{itemize}
\noindent
(3) (\cite[Theorem 4.2.2]{Li3})
The contravariant functor
$\hat{T}_L\colon {}_{\mrm{w}}\Mod^{r,\hat{G}_L}_{/\mfS_L}\to
\mrm{Rep}_{\mbb{Z}_p}(G_L)$
is fully faithful.
Furthermore, its essential image is
contained in the category
of $G_L$-stable $\mbb{Z}_p$-lattices
in potentially semi-stable $\mbb{Q}_p$-representations of $G_L$
which are semi-stable over $L_n$ for some $n\ge 0$
and have Hodge-Tate weights in $[0,r]$.
\end{theorem}
\begin{remark}
\label{Rem:Liu}
Put $m=\mrm{max}\{i\ge 0 ; \zeta_{p^i}\in L^{\mrm{ur}}\}$.
We claim that any $\mbb{Q}_p$-representation of $G_L$ which is
semi-stable over $L_n$ for some $n\ge 0$
is always semi-stable over $L_m$.
In the former half part of the proof of \cite[Theorem 4.2.2]{Li3},
a proof of this claim
with ``$m=\mrm{max}\{i\ge 0 ; \zeta_{p^i}\in L\}$'' is written.
Unfortunately, there is a gap in the proof.
In the proof,
the assumption that the extension
$L(\zeta_n,\pi_{L,n})/L$
is totally ramified is implicitly used
(p.\ $133$,\ between $l.\ 14$ and $l.\ 21$ of \cite{Li3}).
However, this condition is not satisfied in general.
So we need a little modification.
Put $m=\mrm{max}\{i\ge 0 ; \zeta_{p^i}\in L^{\mrm{ur}}\}$ as the beginning.
Denote by $\widehat{L^{\mrm{ur}}}$ the completion of
$L^{\mrm{ur}}$.
We remark that the completion of
the maximal unramified extension of $L_n$ is just
$\widehat{L^{\mrm{ur}}}(\pi_{L,n})$.
Let $V$ be a $\mbb{Q}_p$-representation of $G_L$ which is
semi-stable over $L_n$ for some $n\ge 0$.
Then $V$ is semi-stable over $\widehat{L^{\mrm{ur}}}(\pi_{L,n})$.
We remark that the proof of \cite[Theorem 4.2.2]{Li3} exactly holds
at least under the assumption that the residue field of
the base field is algebraically closed. (We need only the first paragraph of {\it loc.\ cit.} here.)
Thus we know that $V$ is semi-stable over $\widehat{L^{\mrm{ur}}}(\pi_{L,m})$
and thus we obtain the claim.
\end{remark}
Now we restate Theorem \ref{Main1} with the above setting of notation
and give a further result.
Fix the choice of a uniformizer $\pi_K$ of $K$
and a system $(\pi_{K,n})_{n\ge 0}$ of $p$-power roots of $\pi_K$,
and define notations $K_n, \Mod^{r,\hat{G}_K}_{/\mfS_K},\dots $
with respect to them.
Recall that $m_0$ (resp.\ $m$) is the maximum integer
such that $K$
(resp.\ $K^{\mrm{ur}}$)
contains $p^{m_0}$-th (resp.\ $p^m$-th) roots of unity.
We note that the inequality $m_0\le m$ always holds.
For any non-negative integer $n$,
we denote by $\mcal{C}^r_n$
the category of free $\mbb{Z}_p$-representations $T$ of $G_K$
which satisfy the following property;
there exists a semi-stable $\mbb{Q}_p$-representation $V$ of $G_K$
with Hodge-Tate weights in $[0,r]$
such that
$T\otimes_{\mbb{Z}_p}\mbb{Q}_p$ is isomorphic to $V$ as representations of $G_{K_n}$.
Our goal in this paper is to show the following:
\begin{theorem}
\label{Main1'}
The essential image of the functor
$\hat{T}_K\colon {}_{\mrm{w}}\Mod^{r,\hat{G}_K}_{/\mfS_K}\to \mrm{Rep}_{\mbb{Z}_p}(G_K)$
is $\mcal{C}^r_{m_0}$.
\end{theorem}
As an immediate consequence of the above theorem, we obtain
\begin{corollary}
The functor $\hat{T}_K$ induces an anti-equivalence
${}_{\mrm{w}}\Mod^{r,\hat{G}_K}_{/\mfS_K}\overset{\sim}{\to} \mcal{C}^r_{m_0}$.
\end{corollary}
For later use,
we end this section by describing the following proposition.
\begin{proposition}
\label{totst}
Let $L$ be a finite totally ramified extension of $K$.
Then the restriction functor from the category of
semi-stable $\mbb{Q}_p$-representations of $G_K$
into the category of
semi-stable $\mbb{Q}_p$-representations of $G_L$
is fully faithful.
\end{proposition}
\begin{proof}
In view of the theory of Fontaine's filtered $(\vphi, N)$-modules,
the result immediately follows from calculations of elementary
linear algebras.
\end{proof}
\section{Proof of Main Theorem}
Our main goal in this section is to give a proof of Theorem \ref{Main1'}.
In the first three subsections,
we prove the following lemma, which plays an important role
in our proof.
\begin{lemma}
\label{Lem:Main1'}
Denote by $\mcal{C}^r$
the essential image of
$\hat{T}_K\colon {}_{\mrm{w}}\Mod^{r,\hat{G}_K}_{/\mfS_K}\to \mrm{Rep}_{\mbb{Z}_p}(G_K)$.
Then we have $\mcal{C}^r_{m_0}\subset \mcal{C}^r \subset \mcal{C}^r_m$.
\end{lemma}
Clearly, Theorem \ref{Main1'} follows immediately from the lemma if $m_0=m$.
However, the condition $m_0=m$ is not always satisfied.
Before starting a main part of this section, we give some remarks about this condition.
\begin{proposition}
\label{m0=m}
(1) If $k$ is algebraically closed, then $m_0=m$.
\noindent
(2) If $K(\zeta_{p^{m_0+1}})/K$ is ramified, then $m_0=m$.
\noindent
(3) Suppose that $\zeta_p\in K$ (resp.\ $\zeta_4\in K$) if $p$ is odd (resp.\ $p=2$).
Then $\hat{K}$ is totally ramified over $K$
if and only if $m_0=m$.
\end{proposition}
\begin{proof}
The assertion (1) and (2) is clear.
We prove (3).
If $m_0 < m$, then $K(\zeta_{p^m})$ is a non-trivial unramified extension of $K$
and thus the extension $\hat{K}/K$ is not totally ramified.
Conversely, suppose that $\hat{K}/K$ is not totally ramified.
Then there exists an integer $n\ge 0$ such that
$K(\zeta_{p^n},\pi_n)/K$ is not totally ramified.
This implies so is $K(\zeta_{p^n},\pi_n)/K(\pi_n)$.
We may suppose $n\ge m$.
Since $\mrm{Gal}(K(\zeta_{p^n},\pi_n)/K(\pi_n))$
is isomorphic to $\mbb{Z}/p^{n-m_0}\mbb{Z}$ (here we need the assumption
$\zeta_p\in K$ (resp.\ $\zeta_4\in K$) if $p$ is odd (resp.\ $p=2$)),
any subfield of $K(\zeta_{p^n},\pi_n)/K(\pi_n)$
is of the form $K(\zeta_{p^l},\pi_n)$ for $m_0\le l\le n$.
Thus there exists an integer $m_0\le l_0\le n$
such that
$K^{\mrm{ur}}(\pi_n)\cap K(\zeta_{p^n},\pi_n)=K(\zeta_{p^{l_0}},\pi_n)$.
We have
$\zeta_{p^{l_0}}\in K^{\mrm{ur}}(\pi_n)\cap K^{\mrm{ur}}(\zeta_{p^n})$.
Since $\zeta_p\in K$ (resp.\ $\zeta_4\in K$) if $p$ is odd (resp.\ $p=2$),
we have also $K^{\mrm{ur}}(\pi_n)\cap K^{\mrm{ur}}(\zeta_{p^n})=K^{\mrm{ur}}$.
This implies $l_0\le m$.
Since the residue field extension corresponding to
$K(\zeta_{p^n},\pi_n)/K(\pi_n)$
is non-trivial,
the extension $K(\zeta_{p^{l_0}},\pi_n)/K(\pi_n)$
is non-trivial extension
and thus so is
$K(\zeta_{p^m},\pi_n)/K(\pi_n)$.
This implies
$1<[K(\zeta_{p^m},\pi_n):K(\pi_n)]=[K(\zeta_{p^m}):K]$
and hence $m_0<m$.
\end{proof}
\begin{remark}
\label{rem:m0<m}
The condition $m_0=m$ is not always satisfied.
Here are some examples.
\noindent
(1) Suppose $p>2$.
Set $\alpha:=(2+p)^{1/(p-1)}, \beta:=(-p)^{1/(p-1)}$ and $K:=\mbb{Q}_p(\alpha \beta)$.
The field $K$ is totally ramified over $\mbb{Q}_p$ since
the minimal polynomial of $\alpha\beta$ over $\mbb{Q}_p$ is
an Eisenstein polynomial $X^{p-1}-(2+p)(-p)$.
It is well-known that $\mbb{Q}_p(\beta)=\mbb{Q}_p(\zeta_p)$.
The extension $K(\zeta_p)/K$ is not totally ramified
since so is $\mbb{Q}_p(\alpha)/\mbb{Q}_p$ and $p>2$
(note that the residue class of $\alpha$ is not contained in $\mbb{F}_p$).
Now we take any odd prime $p$ such that the extension
$\mbb{Q}(\alpha)/\mbb{Q}$ is unramified (e.g., $p=3,5,7,\dots $).
Then $K(\zeta_p)/K$ is an unramified extension.
This implies that $m_0=0 < m$.
(Moreover, we see that $m=1$.)
\noindent
(2) Suppose $p=2$ and set $K:=\mbb{Q}_2(\sqrt{-5})$.
Then $K(\zeta_4)/K$ is unramified extension of degree $2$, and thus
$m_0=1<m$. (Moreover, we see that $m=2$.)
\noindent
(3) Let $K'$ be a finite extension of $\mbb{Q}_p$ such that
it contains $p$-th roots of unity and $K'(\zeta_{p^{\infty}})/K'$
is a totally ramified extension.
Let $K''$ be an unramified $\mbb{Z}_p$-extension of $K'$.
We denote by $K'_{(n)}$ and $K''_{(n)}$ the unique degree-$p^n$-subextensions of
$K'(\zeta_{p^{\infty}})/K'$ and $K''/K'$, respectively.
Explicitly, the field
$K'_{(n)}$ coincides with $K'(\zeta_{p^{m'_0+n}})$
where $m'_0=\max \{i\ge 0 \mid \zeta_{p^i}\in K'\}$.
If we denote by $M_{(n)}$ the composite field of $K'_{(n)}$ and $K''_{(n)}$,
then we have isomorphisms
$$
\mrm{Gal}(M_{(n)}/K')\simeq
\mrm{Gal}(K'_{(n)}/K')\times \mrm{Gal}(K''_{(n)}/K')
\simeq \mbb{Z}/p^n\mbb{Z}\times \mbb{Z}/p^n\mbb{Z}
$$
Let $K$ be the subfield of $M_{(n)}/K'$ which corresponds to
the group of diagonal components of $\mrm{Gal}(M_{(n)}/K')\simeq
\mbb{Z}/p^n\mbb{Z}\times \mbb{Z}/p^n\mbb{Z}$
via Galois theory. We consider $m_0$ and $m$ for this $K$.
Since $K\cap K'_{(n)}=K'$, we know $m_0=m'_0$.
On the other hand,
since $M_{(n)}=KL_{(n)}=K(\zeta_{p^{m'_0+n}})$ and the extension $M_{(n)}/K$
is unramified, we have $m\ge m_0'+n=m_0+n$.
\end{remark}
\subsection{Lattices in potentially semi-stable representations}
\label{3.1}
In this subsection
we define a notion of $(\vphi,\hat{G}_L,K)$-modules
which classifies
lattices in
potentially semi-stable $\mbb{Q}_p$-representations of $G_K$
which are semi-stable over $L$.
\begin{definition}
\label{def}
A {\it $(\vphi,\hat{G}_L,K)$-module of height $\le r$ over $\mfS_L$}
is a pair $(\hat{\mfM}, G_K)$ where
\begin{itemize}
\item[(1)] $\hat{\mfM}=(\mfM,\vphi,\hat{G}_L)$ is an object of $\Mod^{r,\hat{G}_L}_{/\mfS_L}$,
\item[(2)] $G_K$ is a $W(R)$-semilinear continuous $G_K$-action on
$W(R)\otimes_{\vphi,\mfS_L}\mfM$,
\item[(3)] the $G_K$-action commutes with $\vphi_{W(R)}\otimes \vphi_{\mfM}$, and
\item[(4)] the $W(R)$-semilinear $G_L$-action on
$W(R)\otimes_{\vphi,\mfS_L}\mfM (\simeq W(R)\otimes_{\whR_L} (\whR_L\otimes_{\vphi,\mfS_L}\mfM))$
induced from the $\hat{G}_L$-structure of $\hat{\mfM}\in\Mod^{r,\hat{G}_L}_{/\mfS_L}$
coincides with
the restriction of the $G_K$-action of (2) to $G_L$.
\end{itemize}
If $(\hat{\mfM}, G_K)$ is a $(\vphi,\hat{G}_L,K)$-module of height $\le r$ over $\mfS_L$,
we often abuse notations by writing $\hat{\mfM}$ for $(\hat{\mfM}, G_K)$ for simplicity.
We denote by $\Mod^{r,\hat{G}_L,K}_{/\mfS_L}$
the category of
$(\vphi,\hat{G}_L,K)$-modules of height $\le r$ over $\mfS_L$.
\end{definition}
\noindent
We define a contravariant functor
$\hat{T}_{L/K}\colon \Mod^{r,\hat{G}_L,K}_{/\mfS_L}\to
\mrm{Rep}_{\mbb{Z}_p}(G_K)$
by
$$
\hat{T}_{L/K}(\hat{\mfM})=
\mrm{Hom}_{W(R),\vphi}(W(R)\otimes_{\vphi, \mfS_L} \mfM, W(R))
$$
for an object $\hat{\mfM}$ of $\Mod^{r,\hat{G}_L,K}_{/\mfS_L}$
with underlying Kisin module $\mfM$.
Here a $G_K$-action on
$\hat{T}_{L/K}(\hat{\mfM})$ is given by
$(\sigma.g)(x)=\sigma(g(\sigma^{-1}x))$
for $\sigma\in G_K, g\in \hat{T}_{L/K}(\hat{\mfM}),
x\in W(R)\otimes_{\vphi, \mfS_L} \mfM$.
Note that we have natural isomorphisms
\begin{align*}
\mrm{Hom}_{\whR_L,\vphi}(\whR_L\otimes_{\vphi, \mfS_L} \mfM, W(R))
&\overset{\sim}{\rightarrow}
\mrm{Hom}_{W(R),\vphi}(W(R)\otimes_{\vphi, \whR_L}(\whR_L\otimes_{\vphi, \mfS_L} \mfM), W(R))\\
&\overset{\sim}{\rightarrow}
\mrm{Hom}_{W(R),\vphi}(W(R)\otimes_{\vphi, \mfS_L}\mfM, W(R)).
\end{align*}
Thus we obtain
\begin{equation}
\label{eta}
\eta\colon
\hat{T}_L(\hat{\mfM})\overset{\sim}{\longrightarrow} \hat{T}_{L/K}(\hat{\mfM}).
\end{equation}
This is $G_L$-equivariant by the condition (4) of Definition \ref{def}.
In particular,
$\hat{T}_{L/K}(\hat{\mfM})\otimes_{\mbb{Z}_p} \mbb{Q}_p$ is semi-stable over $L$
by Theorem \ref{Thm:Liu} (2).
The goal of the rest of this subsection is to prove the following theorem.
\begin{theorem}
\label{thm1}
The contravariant functor $\hat{T}_{L/K}$ induces an anti-equivalence
between the following categories:
\begin{itemize}
\item[--] The category of
$(\vphi,\hat{G}_L,K)$-modules of height $\le r$ over $\mfS_L$.
\item[--] The category of $G_K$-stable $\mbb{Z}_p$-lattices
in potentially semi-stable
$\mbb{Q}_p$-representations of $G_K$
which are semi-stable over $L$
and have Hodge-Tate weights in $[0,r]$.
\end{itemize}
\end{theorem}
The above theorem follows by essentially the same arguments of Liu
(\cite{Li3}, \cite{Li4}),
but we write a proof here for the sake of completeness.
Before a proof, we recall Liu's comparison morphisms
between $(\vphi,\hat{G}_L)$-modules and representations associated with them.
Furthermore,
we define its variant for $(\vphi,\hat{G}_L,K)$-modules.
Let $\hat{\mfM}=(\mfM,\vphi,\hat{G}_L)$
be a weak $(\vphi,\hat{G}_L)$-module of height $\le r$ over $\mfS_L$.
By identifying $\hat{T}_L(\hat{\mfM})$ with
$\mrm{Hom}_{W(R),\vphi}(W(R)\otimes_{\vphi, \whR_L}(\whR_L\otimes_{\vphi, \mfS_L} \mfM), W(R))$,
we define a $W(R)$-linear map
$$
\hat{\iota}_L\colon W(R)\otimes_{\whR_L} (\whR_L\otimes_{\vphi,\mfS_L} \mfM) \to
W(R)\otimes_{\mbb{Z}_p} \hat{T}^{\vee}_L(\hat{\mfM})
$$
by the composite
$W(R)\otimes_{\whR_L} (\whR_L\otimes_{\vphi,\mfS_L} \mfM)
\to
\mrm{Hom}_{\mbb{Z}_p}(\hat{T}_L(\hat{\mfM}),W(R))\overset{\sim}{\to}
W(R)\otimes_{\mbb{Z}_p} \hat{T}^{\vee}_L(\hat{\mfM})$.
Here, the first arrow is defined by $x\mapsto (f\mapsto f(x), \forall{f}\in \hat{T}_L(\hat{\mfM}))$
and the second is a natural isomorphism.
Also, for a $(\vphi,\hat{G}_L,K)$-module $\hat{\mfM}$
of height $\le r$ over $\mfS_L$,
we define a natural $W(R)$-linear map
$$
\hat{\iota}_{L/K}\colon W(R)\otimes_{\vphi,\mfS_L}\mfM \hookrightarrow
W(R)\otimes_{\mbb{Z}_p} \hat{T}^{\vee}_{L/K}(\hat{\mfM})
$$
by a similar way. Let $\mfrak{t}$ be an element of $W(R)\smallsetminus pW(R)$
such that $\vphi(\mfrak{t})=pE_L(u_L)E_L(0)^{-1}\mfrak{t}$.
Such $\mfrak{t}$ is unique up to units of $\mbb{Z}_p$.
\begin{proposition}
\label{comparison}
(1) (\cite[Proposition 3.1.3]{Li3})
The map
$
\hat{\iota}_L
$
as above is injective, which preserves Frobenius and $G_L$-actions.
Furthermore, we have
$\vphi(\mfrak{t})^r(W(R)\otimes_{\mbb{Z}_p} \hat{T}^{\vee}_L(\hat{\mfM}))
\subset \mrm{Im}\ \hat{\iota}_L$.
\noindent
(2) The map
$
\hat{\iota}_{L/K}
$
as above is injective, which preserves Frobenius and $G_K$-actions.
Furthermore, we have
$\vphi(\mfrak{t})^r(W(R)\otimes_{\mbb{Z}_p} \hat{T}^{\vee}_{L/K}(\hat{\mfM}))
\subset \mrm{Im}\ \hat{\iota}_{L/K}$.
\noindent
(3) Let $\hat{\mfM}$
be a $(\vphi,\hat{G}_L,K)$-module of height $\le r$ over $\mfS_L$
with underlying Kisin module $\mfM$.
Then the following diagram is commutative:
\begin{center}
$
\displaystyle \xymatrix{
W(R)\otimes_{\whR_L} (\whR_L\otimes_{\vphi,\mfS_L} \mfM)
\ar@{^{(}->}^{\hat{\iota}_L}[rr] \ar[d]_{\wr}
& &
W(R)\otimes_{\mbb{Z}_p} \hat{T}^{\vee}_L(\hat{\mfM})
\\
W(R)\otimes_{\vphi,\mfS_L}\mfM \ar@{^{(}->}^{\hat{\iota}_{L/K}}[rr]
& &
W(R)\otimes_{\mbb{Z}_p} \hat{T}^{\vee}_{L/K}(\hat{\mfM})
\ar[u]_{W(R)\otimes \eta^{\vee}}^{\wr}
}$
\end{center}
Here, the left vertical arrow is a natural isomorphism and
$\eta$ is defined in (\ref{eta}).
\end{proposition}
\begin{proof}
The commutativity of (3) is clear by construction, and
the rest assertions follow by essentially the same proof as \cite[Proposition 3.1.3]{Li3}.
\end{proof}
In the rest of this subsection,
we denote by $\mrm{Rep}^{r,L\mathchar`-\mrm{st}}_{\mbb{Z}_p}(G_K)$ the full subcategory of
$\mrm{Rep}_{\mbb{Z}_p}(G_K)$ appeared in Theorem \ref{thm1}.
The isomorphism $\eta$ shows below.
\begin{lemma}
The functor $\hat{T}_{L/K}$ has values in $\mrm{Rep}^{r,L\mathchar`-\mrm{st}}_{\mbb{Z}_p}(G_K)$.
\end{lemma}
Next we show the fully faithfulness of the functor $\hat{T}_{L/K}$.
\begin{lemma}
The functor $\hat{T}_{L/K}$ is fully faithful.
\end{lemma}
\begin{proof}
Let $\hat{\mfM}$ and
$\hat{\mfM}'$
be $(\vphi,\hat{G}_L,K)$-modules of height $\le r$ over $\mfS_L$
with underlying Kisin modules $\mfM$ and $\mfM'$, respectively.
Take any $G_K$-equivariant morphism
$f\colon \hat{T}_{L/K}(\hat{\mfM})\to \hat{T}_{L/K}(\hat{\mfM}')$.
By the map $\eta$, we identify $\hat{T}_{L/K}(\hat{\mfM})$ and $\hat{T}_{L/K}(\hat{\mfM}')$
with $\hat{T}_L(\hat{\mfM})$ and $\hat{T}_L(\hat{\mfM}')$, respectively.
Since $\hat{T}_L$ is fully faithful,
there exists a unique morphism
$\mfrak{f}\colon \hat{\mfM}'\to \hat{\mfM}$
of $(\vphi,\hat{G}_L)$-modules of height $\le r$ over $\mfS_L$
such that $\hat{T}_L(\mfrak{f})=f$.
It is enough to show that
$\mfrak{f}$ is in fact a morphism of $(\vphi,\hat{G}_L,K)$-modules,
that is, $W(R)\otimes \mfrak{f}\colon W(R)\otimes_{\vphi, \mfS_L}\mfM'\to W(R)\otimes_{\vphi, \mfS_L}\mfM$
is $G_K$-equivariant.
Consider the following diagram:
\begin{center}
$
\displaystyle \xymatrix{
W(R)\otimes_{\vphi,\mfS_L} \mfM
\ar@{^{(}->}^{\hat{\iota}_{L/K}}[rr]
& &
W(R)\otimes_{\mbb{Z}_p} \hat{T}^{\vee}_{L/K}(\hat{\mfM})
\\
W(R)\otimes_{\vphi,\mfS_L}\mfM'
\ar@{^{(}->}^{\hat{\iota}_{L/K}}[rr]
\ar[u]^{W(R)\otimes \mfrak{f}}
& &
W(R)\otimes_{\mbb{Z}_p} \hat{T}_{L/K}(\hat{\mfM}')
\ar[u]^{W(R)\otimes f^{\vee}}
}$
\end{center}
We see that the above diagram is commutative.
Since $W(R)\otimes f^{\vee}$ and two horizontal arrows
above are $G_K$-equivariant,
so is $W(R)\otimes \mfrak{f}$.
\end{proof}
\begin{lemma}
\label{ess1}
The functor $\hat{T}_{L/K}\colon \Mod^{r,\hat{G}_L,K}_{/\mfS_L}\to
\mrm{Rep}^{r,L\mathchar`-\mrm{st}}_{\mbb{Z}_p}(G_K)$
is essentially surjective
if $L$ is a Galois extension of $K$.
\end{lemma}
To show this lemma,
we recall arguments of \cite[\S 2]{Li4}.
Suppose $L$ is a (not necessary totally ramified) Galois extension of $K$.
Let $T$ be an object of $\mrm{Rep}^{r,L\mathchar`-\mrm{st}}_{\mbb{Z}_p}(G_K)$.
Put $d=\mrm{rank}_{\mbb{Z}_p}T$.
Take a $(\vphi,\hat{G}_L)$-module
$\hat{\mfM}=(\mfM,\vphi,\hat{G}_L)$ over $\mfS_L$
such that $\hat{T}_L(\hat{\mfM})= T|_{G_L}$.
We consider the map
$\hat{\iota}_L\colon W(R)\otimes_{\vphi,\mfS_L}\mfM
\hookrightarrow W(R)\otimes_{\mbb{Z}_p} \hat{T}^{\vee}_L(\hat{\mfM})
=W(R)\otimes_{\mbb{Z}_p} T^{\vee}$.
By the same argument as the proof of \cite[Lemma 2.3.1]{Li4},
we can check the following
\begin{lemma}
\label{claim}
$W(R)\otimes_{\vphi,\mfS_L}\mfM$ is stable
under the $G_K$-action via $\hat{\iota}_L$.
\end{lemma}
\noindent
We include (a main part of) the proof in {\it loc.\ cit.} of this lemma here
since we will use this argument again in the next subsection
(cf.\ the proof of Theorem \ref{Main2}).
By \cite{Br}, we know that
$\mcal{D}:=S_L[1/p]\otimes_{\vphi,\mfS_L}\mfM$
has a structure of a Breuil module\footnote{We do not describe the definition of
Breuil modules in this note. See \S 6.1 of \cite{Br} for axioms of Breuil modules.}
which
corresponds to $V|_{G_L}$, where
$V:=T\otimes_{\mbb{Z}_p}\mbb{Q}_p$.
In particular, we have a monodromy operator $N_{\mcal{D}}$ on $\mcal{D}$.
Set $D:=\mcal{D}/I_+S_L[1/p]\mcal{D}$.
There exists a unique $\vphi$-compatible $W(k_L)$-linear section
$s\colon D\hookrightarrow \mcal{D}$.
Breuil showed in {\it loc.\ cit.} that
$N_{\mcal{D}}$ preserves $s(D)$
and thus
we can define $\tilde{N}:=N_{\mcal{D}}|_{s(D)}\colon s(D)\to s(D)$.
Then the $G_L$-action on
$B^+_{\mrm{st}}\otimes_{S_L[1/p]}s(D)(=B^+_{\mrm{st}}\otimes_{\whR_L} (\whR_L\otimes_{\vphi,\mfS_L} \mfM))$
induced from the $\hat{G}_L$-structure on $\hat{\mfM}$
is given by
$$
g(a\otimes x)=\sum^{\infty}_{i=0}g(a)\gamma_i(-\mrm{log}([\underline{\e}(g)]))
\otimes \tilde{N}^i(x)
$$
for any $g\in G_L, a\in B^+_{\mrm{st}}$ and $x\in s(D)$.
Here, $\underline{\e}(g):=g(\underline{\pi_L})/\underline{\pi_L}\in R^{\times}$.
Set
$$
\bar{D}:=\left\{\sum^{\infty}_{i=0} \gamma_i(\mfrak{u})\otimes \tilde{N}^i(x)
\mid x\in s(D) \right\}
\subset B^+_{\mrm{st}}\otimes_{W(k_L)[1/p]}s(D)
$$
where $\mfrak{u}:=\mrm{log}([\underline{\pi_L}])\in B^+_{\mrm{st}}$.
This is a $\vphi$-stable $W(k_L)[1/p]$-vector space of dimension $d$.
Setting the monodromy $N_{B^+_{\mrm{st}}}$
on $B^+_{\mrm{st}}$ by $N(\mfrak{u})=1$,
we equip $B^+_{\mrm{st}}\otimes_{W(k_L)[1/p]}s(D)$
(resp.\ $B^+_{\mrm{st}}\otimes_{\mbb{Q}_p}V^{\vee}$)
with a monodromy operator $N$ by $N:=N_{B^+_{\mrm{st}}}\otimes 1_{s(D)}$
(resp.\ $N:=N_{B^+_{\mrm{st}}}\otimes 1_{V^{\vee}}$).
Then it is easy to see that $\bar{D}$ is stable under $N$.
On the other hand,
we have a natural $G_K$-equivariant injection
$\iota\colon B^+_{\mrm{st}}\otimes_{W(k_L)[1/p]} D_{\mrm{st}}(V)
\hookrightarrow B^+_{\mrm{st}}\otimes_{\mbb{Q}_p} V^{\vee}
$
where $D_{\mrm{st}}(V):=(B^+_{\mrm{st}}\otimes_{\mbb{Q}_p} V^{\vee})^{G_L}$
is a filtered $(\vphi,N)$-module over $L$.
(Here we remark that $D_{\mrm{st}}(V)$ is equipped with a natural $G_K$-action
since $L/K$ is Galois.)
Since $G_L$ acts on $\bar{D}$
trivially (cf.\ \S 7.2 of \cite{Li1}),
the image of $\bar{D}$ under the injection
$
B^+_{\mrm{st}}\otimes_{W(k_L)[1/p]}s(D)=
B^+_{\mrm{st}}\otimes_{\whR_L} (\whR_L\otimes_{\vphi,\mfS_L} \mfM)
\overset{\hat{\iota}_{L,B}}{\hookrightarrow}
B^+_{\mrm{st}}\otimes_{\mbb{Q}_p}V^{\vee}
$
is equal to $\iota(D_{\mrm{st}}(V))$.
Here, $\hat{\iota}_{L,B}:=B^+_{\mrm{st}}\otimes \hat{\iota}_L$,
which is compatible with Frobenius and monodromy operators.
Hence we have an isomorphism $\hat{i}\colon D_{\mrm{st}}(V)\overset{\sim}{\longrightarrow} \bar{D}$
which makes the following diagram commutative:
\begin{center}
$
\displaystyle \xymatrix{
D_{\mrm{st}}(V)
\ar_{\wr}^{\hat{i}}[d]
& \subset &
B^+_{\mrm{st}}\otimes_{W(k_L)[1/p]} D_{\mrm{st}}(V)
\ar@{^{(}->}^{\qquad \quad \iota}[rr]
& &
B^+_{\mrm{st}}\otimes_{\mbb{Q}_p} V^{\vee}
\ar@{=}[d]
\\
\bar{D}
& \subset &
B^+_{\mrm{st}}\otimes_{W(k_L)[1/p]}s(D)
\ar@{^{(}->}^{\qquad \hat{\iota}_{L,B}}[rr]
& &
B^+_{\mrm{st}}\otimes_{\mbb{Q}_p}V^{\vee}
}$
\end{center}
Note that $\hat{i}$ is compatible with Frobenius and monodromy operators.
We identify $D_{\mrm{st}}(V)$ with $\bar{D}$ by $\hat{i}$.
Let $e_1,\dots, e_d$ be a $W(k_L)[1/p]$-basis of $D$, and
define a matrix $\bar{N}\in M_d(W(k_L)[1/p])$ by
$\tilde{N}(s(e_1),\dots ,s(e_d))=(s(e_1),\dots ,s(e_d))\bar{N}$.
Put $\bar{e}_j=\sum^{\infty}_{i=0} \gamma_i(\mfrak{u})\otimes \tilde{N}^i(s(e_j))$
for any $j$.
Then $\bar{e}_1,\dots ,\bar{e}_d$ is a basis of $D_{\mrm{st}}(V)=\bar{D}$.
An easy calculation shows that
the monodromy $N$ on $D_{\mrm{st}}(V)=\bar{D}$
is represented by $\bar{N}$ for this basis,
that is,
$N(\bar{e}_1,\dots ,\bar{e}_d)=(\bar{e}_1,\dots ,\bar{e}_d)\bar{N}$.
We define a matrix $A_g\in GL_d(W(k_L)[1/p])$
by
$g(\bar{e}_1,\dots ,\bar{e}_d)
=(\bar{e}_1,\dots ,\bar{e}_d)A_g$
for any $g\in G_K$.
Since the $G_K$-action on $D_{\mrm{st}}(V)=\bar{D}$ is compatible with $N$,
we have the relation $A_gg(\bar{N})=\bar{N}A_g$.
Consequently, we have
\begin{equation}
\label{action}
g(s(e_1),\dots ,s(e_d))=(s(e_1),\dots ,s(e_d))\mrm{exp}(-\lambda_g\bar{N})A_g
\end{equation}
in $B^+_{\mrm{st}}\otimes_{\mbb{Q}_p}V^{\vee}$,
where $\lambda_g:=\mrm{log}([g(\underline{\pi_L})/\underline{\pi_L}])\in B^+_{\mrm{cris}}$.
This implies that
$B^+_{\mrm{cris}}\otimes_{\vphi,\mfS_L}\mfM
=B^+_{\mrm{cris}}\otimes_{W(k_L)[1/p]} s(D)$ is stable
under the $G_K$-action via $\hat{\iota}_{L,B}$.
Now Lemma \ref{claim} follows by
an easy combination of Proposition \ref{comparison} (1) and \cite[Lemma 3.2.2]{Li3}
(cf.\ the first paragraph of the proof of \cite[Lemma 2.3.1]{Li4}).
\begin{proof}[Proof of Lemma \ref{ess1}]
We continue to use the same notation as above.
By Lemma \ref{claim}, we know that
$\hat{\mfM}$
has a structure of an object of $\Mod^{r,\hat{G}_L,K}_{/\mfS_L}$
with the property that the map
$W(R)\otimes_{\vphi,\mfS_L}\mfM\overset{\hat{\iota}_L}{\hookrightarrow}
W(R)\otimes_{\mbb{Z}_p} \hat{T}^{\vee}_L(\hat{\mfM})
=W(R)\otimes_{\mbb{Z}_p} T^{\vee}$
is $G_K$-equivariant.
Let $\eta\colon \hat{T}_L(\hat{\mfM})
\overset{\sim}{\longrightarrow} \hat{T}_{L/K}(\hat{\mfM})$
be the isomorphism defined in (\ref{eta}).
By Proposition \ref{comparison} (3),
we know that $W(R)\otimes \eta^{\vee}$ induces an isomorphism
$\hat{\iota}_L(W(R)\otimes_{\vphi,\mfS_L}\mfM)\overset{\sim}{\longrightarrow}
\hat{\iota}_{L/K}(W(R)\otimes_{\vphi,\mfS_L}\mfM)$,
which is $G_K$-equivariant.
Since $\vphi(\mft)^r(W(R)\otimes_{\mbb{Z}_p} \hat{T}^{\vee}_L(\hat{\mfM}))$
(resp.\ $\vphi(\mft)^r(W(R)\otimes_{\mbb{Z}_p} \hat{T}^{\vee}_{L/K}(\hat{\mfM}))$)
is contained in $(\hat{\iota}_L(W(R)\otimes_{\vphi,\mfS_L}\mfM))$
(resp.\ $(\hat{\iota}_{L/K}(W(R)\otimes_{\vphi,\mfS_L}\mfM))$),
we known that the map
$\vphi(\mft)^r(W(R)\otimes_{\mbb{Z}_p} \hat{T}^{\vee}_L(\hat{\mfM}))
\overset{\sim}{\longrightarrow}
\vphi(\mft)^r(W(R)\otimes_{\mbb{Z}_p} \hat{T}^{\vee}_{L/K}(\hat{\mfM}))$
induced from $W(R)\otimes \eta^{\vee}$ is $G_K$-equivariant.
Thus so is $\eta\colon T=\hat{T}_L(\hat{\mfM})\overset{\sim}{\longrightarrow}
\hat{T}_{L/K}(\hat{\mfM})$.
\end{proof}
\begin{remark}
Let $\hat{e}_1,\dots ,\hat{e}_d$ be a $\mfS_K$-basis of $\vphi^{\ast}\mfM$,
which is also an $S_K[1/p]$-basis of $\mcal{D}$.
Denote by $e_i$ the image of $\hat{e}_i$ under the projection
$\mcal{D}\twoheadrightarrow D$.
Then $e_1,\dots ,e_d$ is a $W(k)[1/p]$-basis of $D$.
For these basis, we see that
the matrix $A_g\in GL_d(W(k_L)[1/p])$ as above
is in fact contained in $GL_d(W(k_L))$ by Lemma \ref{ess1}.
(However, we never use this fact in the present paper.)
\end{remark}
\begin{lemma}
The functor $\hat{T}_{L/K}\colon \Mod^{r,\hat{G}_L,K}_{/\mfS_L}\to
\mrm{Rep}^{r,L\mathchar`-\mrm{st}}_{\mbb{Z}_p}(G_K)$
is essentially surjective
for any finite extension $L$ of $K$.
\end{lemma}
\begin{proof}
Let $T$ be an object of $\mrm{Rep}^{L\mathchar`-\mrm{st},r}_{\mbb{Z}_p}(G_K)$.
Let $L'$ be the Galois closure of $L$ over $K$
(and fix the choice of a uniformizer of $L'$ and a system of $p$-power roots of it;
see Remark \ref{importantremark}).
Since we have already shown Theorem \ref{thm1} for $\hat{T}_{L'/K}$,
we know that there exists a
$(\vphi,\hat{G}_{L'},K)$-module $\hat{\mfM}'$
over $\mfS_{L'}$
such that $\hat{T}_{L'/K}(\hat{\mfM}')\simeq T$
as representations of $G_K$.
On the other hand, we have a unique $(\vphi,\hat{G}_L)$-module
$\hat{\mfM}$ such that $T\simeq \hat{T}_L(\hat{\mfM})$
as representations of $G_L$ since $T$ is semi-stable over $L$.
We denote by $\mfM'$ and $\mfM$
underlying Kisin modules of $\hat{\mfM}'$ and $\hat{\mfM}$,
respectively.
By \cite[Theorem 3.2.1]{Li5} and Proposition \ref{comparison} (3),
the image of $W(R)\otimes_{\vphi,\mfS_{L'}} \mfM'$ under
$\hat{\iota}_{L'/K}$ is equal to that of $W(R)\otimes_{\vphi,\mfS_L}\mfM$
under $\hat{\iota}_L$.
Hence we have a $\vphi$-equivariant isomorphism
$W(R)\otimes_{\vphi,\mfS_{L'}} \mfM' \simeq W(R)\otimes_{\vphi,\mfS_L}\mfM$.
We define a $G_K$-action on $W(R)\otimes_{\vphi,\mfS_L}\mfM$
by this isomorphism.
Then
$\hat{\mfM}$ has a structure of
$(\vphi,\hat{G}_L,K)$-module
over $\mfS_L$ so that
$\hat{\iota}_L\colon W(R)\otimes_{\vphi,\mfS_L}\mfM\hookrightarrow
W(R)\otimes_{\mbb{Z}_p} T^{\vee}$
is $G_K$-equivariant.
Since
$\hat{T}_{L/K}(\hat{\mfM})
=\mrm{Hom}_{W(R),\vphi}(W(R)\otimes_{\vphi,\mfS_L}\mfM,W(R))
\simeq \mrm{Hom}_{W(R),\vphi}(W(R)\otimes_{\vphi,\mfS_{L'}}\mfM',W(R))
=\hat{T}_{L'/K}(\hat{\mfM}')=T$
as representations of $G_K$,
we have done.
\end{proof}
\subsection{$\mcal{C}^r_{m_0}\subset \mcal{C}^r$}
\label{3.2}
We prove the relation
$\mcal{C}^r_{m_0}\subset \mcal{C}^r$ in the assertion of Lemma \ref{Lem:Main1'}.
At first, fix the choices of a uniformizer $\pi_K$ of $K$
and a system $(\pi_{K,n})_{n\ge 0}$ of $p$-power roots of $\pi_K$,
and define notations $K_n, \mfS_K, \Mod^{r,\hat{G}_K}_{/\mfS_K},\dots $
with respect to them (see also Remark \ref{importantremark}).
We also consider notations
$\mfS_{K_n}, S_{K_n},\dots $
with respect to the uniformizer $\pi_{K_n}:=\pi_{K,n}$ of $K_n$
and the system $(\pi_{K,n+m})_{m\ge 0}$ of $p$-power roots of $\pi_{K_n}$.
Note that we have $\mfS_K\subset \mfS_{K_n}$, $S_K\subset S_{K_n}$ and $E_{K_n}(u_{K_n})=E_K(u_K)$
with the relation
$u^{p^n}_{K_n}=u_K$.
To show the relation
$\mcal{C}^r_{m_0}\subset \mcal{C}^r$,
it follows from Lemma 2.1.15 of \cite{Ki}
that it suffices to show the following.
\begin{proposition}
\label{Main2}
Let $T$ be a free $\mbb{Z}_p$-representation of $G_K$
which is semi-stable over $K_n$ for some $n\le m_0$
and $T|_{G_{K_{\infty}}}\simeq T_{\mfS_K}(\mfM)$ for some $\mfM\in \mrm{Mod}^r_{/\mfS_K}$.
Then there exists a (unique)
weak $(\vphi,\hat{G}_K)$-module $\hat{\mfM}$ of height $\le r$ over $\mfS_K$
such that $\hat{T}_K(\hat{\mfM})\simeq T$.
\end{proposition}
\begin{proof}
Let $T, n$ and $\mfM$ be as in the statement.
Note that $K_n$ is a now Galois extension of $K$ for such $n$,
and note also that
$\mfM_n:=\mfS_{K_n}\otimes_{\mfS_K}\mfM$ is a Kisin module of
height $\le r$ over $\mfS_{K_n}$.
By Theorem \ref{thm1},
there exists a $(\vphi,\hat{G}_{K_n},K)$-module $\hat{\mfN}$ over $\mfS_{K_n}$
such that $T\simeq \hat{T}_{K_n/K}(\hat{\mfN})$.
Denote by $\mfN$ the underlying Kisin module of $\hat{\mfN}$.
Since $T_{\mfS_{K_n}}(\mfM_n)$ is isomorphic to $T_{\mfS_{K_n}}(\mfN)$,
we may identify $\mfN$ with $\mfM_n$.
Thus $\mfM_n$ is equipped with a structure of a
$(\vphi,\hat{G}_{K_n},K)$-module $\hat{\mfM}_n$ over $\mfS_{K_n}$
such that $T\simeq \hat{T}_{K_n/K}(\hat{\mfM}_n)$.
Putting $\vphi^{\ast}\mfM=\mfS_K\otimes_{\vphi,\mfS_K}\mfM$,
we know that $G_K(\vphi^{\ast}\mfM)$ is contained in
$W(R)\otimes_{\vphi,\mfS_{K_n}}\mfM_n=W(R)\otimes_{\vphi,\mfS_K}\mfM$.
We claim that $G_K(\vphi^{\ast}\mfM)$ is contained in $\mcal{R}_{K}\otimes_{\vphi,\mfS_K}\mfM$.
Admitting this claim, we see that $\mfM$ has a structure of a weak $(\vphi,\hat{G}_K)$-module
of height $\le r$ over $\mfS_K$
which corresponds to $T$, and hence we finish a proof.
Put $\mcal{D}_n=S_{K_n}[1/p]\otimes_{\vphi,\mfS_{K_n}}\mfM_n$ and
$\mcal{D}=S_K[1/p]\otimes_{\vphi,\mfS_K}\mfM$.
Let $\hat{e}_1,\dots ,\hat{e}_d$ be a $\mfS_K$-basis of $\vphi^{\ast}\mfM$,
which is an $S_{K_n}[1/p]$-basis of $\mcal{D}_n$ and an $S_K[1/p]$-basis of $\mcal{D}$.
Denote by $e_i$ the image of $\hat{e}_i$ under the projection
$\mcal{D}\twoheadrightarrow \mcal{D}/I_+S_K[1/p]=:D$.
Then $e_1,\dots ,e_d$ is a $W(k)[1/p]$-basis of $D$.
By \cite[Proposition 6.2.1.1]{Br}, we have a unique $\vphi$-compatible
section $s\colon D\hookrightarrow \mcal{D}$ of the projection
$\mcal{D}\twoheadrightarrow D$.
Since $\mcal{D}=S_K[1/p]\otimes_{W(k)[1/p]} s(D)$,
there exists a matrix $X\in GL_d(S_K[1/p])$
such that
$(\hat{e}_1,\dots ,\hat{e}_d)=(s(e_1),\dots ,s(e_d))X$.
Now we extend the $G_K$-action on $W(R)\otimes_{\vphi,\mfS_{K_n}} \mfM_n$
to $B^+_{\mrm{cris}}\otimes_{W(k)[1/p]} s(D)
=B^+_{\mrm{cris}}\otimes_{W(R)} (W(R)\otimes_{\vphi,\mfS_{K_n}} \mfM_n)$
by a natural way.
Take any $g\in G_K$ and put $\lambda_g=\mrm{log}([g(\underline{\pi_{K_n}})/\underline{\pi_{K_n}}])$.
We see that $\lambda_g$ is contained in $\mcal{R}_{K}$.
Recall that $K_n$ is now a totally ramified Galois extension over $K$.
By (\ref{action}),
we have $g(s(e_1),\dots ,s(e_d))=(s(e_1),\dots ,s(e_d))\mrm{exp}(-\lambda_g\bar{N})A_g$
for some nilpotent matrix $\bar{N}\in M_d(W(k)[1/p])$ and
some $A_g\in GL_d(W(k)[1/p])$.
Therefore, we obtain
$g(\hat{e}_1,\dots ,\hat{e}_d)
=(\hat{e}_1,\dots ,\hat{e}_d)X^{-1}\mrm{exp}(-\lambda_g\bar{N})A_gg(X)$.
Since the matrix $X^{-1}\mrm{exp}(-\lambda_g\bar{N})A_gg(X)$ has coefficients in
$\mcal{R}_{K}$, we have done.
\end{proof}
\begin{remark}
We remark that, for any semi-stable $\mbb{Q}_p$-representation $V$ of $G_{K_n}$
with Hodge-Tate weights in $[0,r]$,
there exists a Kisin module $\mfM_n\in \mrm{Mod}^r_{/\mfS_{K_n}}$
such that $V|_{G_{K_{\infty}}}$ is isomorphic to
$T_{\mfS_{K_n}}(\mfM_n)\otimes_{\mbb{Z}_p}\mbb{Q}_p$ (cf. \cite[Lemma 2.1.15]{Ki}).
The above proposition
studies the case where
$\mfM_n$ descends
to a Kisin module over $\mfS_K$, but
this condition is not always satisfied.
An example for this is given in the proof of Proposition \ref{prop:rem}.
\end{remark}
\subsection{$\mcal{C}^r \subset \mcal{C}^r_m$}
\label{3.3}
Next we prove the relation $\mcal{C}^r \subset \mcal{C}^r_m$
in the assertion of Lemma \ref{Lem:Main1'}.
The key for our proof is the following proposition.
\begin{proposition}
\label{Thm2}
The restriction functor
$\mrm{Rep}_{\mbb{Q}_p}(G_K)\to \mrm{Rep}_{\mbb{Q}_p}(G_{K_n})$
induces an equivalence between the following categories:
\begin{itemize}
\item[--] The category of semi-stable $\mbb{Q}_p$-representations of $G_K$
with Hodge-Tate weights in $[0,r]$.
\item[--] The category of semi-stable $\mbb{Q}_p$-representations $V$ of $G_{K_n}$
with the property that $V|_{G_{K_{\infty}}}$ is isomorphic to
$T_{\mfS_K}(\mfM)\otimes_{\mbb{Z}_p}\mbb{Q}_p$
for some $\mfM\in \mrm{Mod}^r_{/\mfS_K}$.
\end{itemize}
\end{proposition}
The result below immediately follows from the above proposition.
\begin{corollary}
\label{Main3}
Let $T$ be a free $\mbb{Z}_p$-representation of $G_K$
which is semi-stable over $K_n$
for some $n\ge 0$.
Then the following conditions are equivalent:
\begin{itemize}
\item[--] $T|_{G_{K_{\infty}}}$ is isomorphic to
$T_{\mfS_K}(\mfM)$ for some $\mfM\in \mrm{Mod}^r_{/\mfS_K}$.
\item[--] There exists a semi-stable $\mbb{Q}_p$-representation $V$ of $G_K$
with Hodge-Tate weights in $[0,r]$ such that
$T\otimes_{\mbb{Z}_p}\mbb{Q}_p$ is isomorphic to $V$ as representations
of $G_{K_{n'}}$ for some $n'\ge 0$.
\end{itemize}
\end{corollary}
\begin{remark}
\label{Rem:func}
In the statement of Corollary \ref{Main3},
we can always choose $n'$ to be $n$.
In addition, for a given $T$, $V$ is uniquely determined up to isomorphism.
Furthermore, the association $T\mapsto V$ is functorial.
These follow from Proposition \ref{totst}.
\end{remark}
Combining this corollary with Theorem \ref{Thm:Liu} (3) and
Remark \ref{Rem:Liu},
we obtain the desired relation $\mcal{C}^r \subset \mcal{C}^r_m$.
Therefore, it suffices to show Proposition \ref{Thm2}.
We begin with the following two lemmas.
\begin{lemma}
\label{exercise1}
For any $i\ge 0$,
we have a canonical decomposition
$$
\mrm{Fil}^iS_{K_n}=\bigoplus^{p^n-1}_{j=0}u^j_{K_n}\mrm{Fil}^iS_K.
$$
\end{lemma}
\begin{proof}
Exercise.
\end{proof}
\begin{lemma}
\label{exercise2}
Let $\mfM$ be a Kisin module of height $\le r$ over $\mfS_K$.
\noindent
(1) $\mfM_n:=\mfS_{K_n}\otimes_{\mfS_K}\mfM$ is a Kisin module of height $\le r$ over $\mfS_{K_n}$
(with Frobenius $\vphi_{\mfM_n}:=\vphi_{\mfS_{K_n}}\otimes \vphi_{\mfM}$).
\noindent
(2) Let $\mcal{M}:=S_K\otimes_{\vphi,\mfS_K}\mfM$ and
$\mcal{M}_n:=S_{K_n}\otimes_{\vphi,\mfS_K}\mfM=S_{K_n}\otimes_{\vphi,\mfS_{K_n}}\mfM_n$.
Define $\mrm{Fil}^i\mcal{M}
:=\{x\in \mcal{M} \mid (1\otimes \vphi_{\mfM})(x)\in \mrm{Fil}^iS_K\otimes_{\mfS_K} \mfM \}$
and
$\mrm{Fil}^i\mcal{M}_n
:=\{x\in \mcal{M}_n \mid (1\otimes \vphi_{\mfM})(x)\in \mrm{Fil}^iS_{K_n}\otimes_{\mfS_{K}} \mfM\}
=\{x\in \mcal{M}_n \mid (1\otimes \vphi_{\mfM_n})(x)\in \mrm{Fil}^iS_{K_n}\otimes_{\mfS_{K_n}} \mfM_n \}$.
Then the natural isomorphism
$S_{K_n}\otimes_{S_K}\mcal{M}\overset{\sim}{\rightarrow} \mcal{M}_n$
induces an isomorphism
$S_{K_n}\otimes_{S_K}\mrm{Fil}^i\mcal{M}\overset{\sim}{\rightarrow} \mrm{Fil}^i\mcal{M}_n$.
\end{lemma}
\begin{proof}
The assertion (1) follows immediately
by the relation $E_K(u_K)=E_{K_n}(u_{K_n})$.
In the rest of this proof we identify
$S_{K_n}\otimes_{S_K}\mcal{M}$ with $\mcal{M}_n$
by a natural way.
We show that
$S_{K_n}\otimes_{S_K}\mrm{Fil}^i\mcal{M}=\mrm{Fil}^i\mcal{M}_n$.
The inclusion $S_{K_n}\otimes_{S_K}\mrm{Fil}^i\mcal{M}\subset \mrm{Fil}^i\mcal{M}_n$
follows from an easy calculation.
We have to prove the opposite inclusion.
Let $e_1,\dots ,e_d$ be an $\mfS_K$-basis of $\mfM$ and define a matrix $A\in M_d(\mfS_K)$
by
$\vphi_{\mfM}(e_1,\dots ,e_d)=(e_1,\dots ,e_d)A$.
We put $e^{\ast}_i=1\otimes e_i\in \vphi^{\ast}\mfM$ for any $i$.
Then $e^{\ast}_1,\dots ,e^{\ast}_d$ is an $S_{K_n}$-basis of $\mcal{M}_n$.
Take $x=\sum^d_{k=1}a_ke^{\ast}_k\in \mrm{Fil}^i\mcal{M}_n$ with $a_k\in S_{K_n}$.
Since $(1\otimes \vphi_{\mfM})(x)$ is contained in
$\mrm{Fil}^iS_{K_n}\otimes_{\mfS} \mfM$,
we see that the matrix
$$
X:=A\begin{pmatrix}
a_1\\\rotatebox{90}{\dots}\\ a_d
\end{pmatrix}
$$
has coefficients in $\mrm{Fil}^iS_{K_n}$.
By Lemma \ref{exercise1},
each $a_k$ can be decomposed as
$\sum^{p^n-1}_{j=0}u^j_{K_n}a^{(j)}_k$
for some $a^{(j)}_k\in S_K$.
Writing $A=(a_{lk})_{l,k}$ and $X={}^{\mrm{t}}(x_1,\dots ,x_d)$,
we have
$$
x_l=\sum^d_{k=1}a_{lk}a_k=\sum^{p^n-1}_{j=0}u^j_{K_n}\sum^d_{k=1} a_{lk}a_k^{(j)}.
$$
By Lemma \ref{exercise1} again,
we obtain that $\sum^d_{k=1} a_{lk}a_k^{(j)}\in \mrm{Fil}^iS_K$.
If we put $x_{(j)}=\sum^d_{k=1}a_k^{(j)}e^{\ast}_k\in \mcal{M}$,
we have
$$
(1\otimes \vphi_{\mfM})(x_{(j)})=\sum^d_{l=1}(\sum^d_{k=1} a_{lk}a_k^{(j)})e_l,
$$
which is contained in
$\mrm{Fil}^iS_K\otimes_{\mfS_K}\mfM$.
Therefore, each $x_{(j)}$ is contained in $\mrm{Fil}^i\mcal{M}$.
Since $x=\sum^{p^n-1}_{j=0}u^j_{K_n}x_{(j)}$,
we obtain the fact that $x$ is contained in $S_{K_n}\otimes_{S_K}\mrm{Fil}^i\mcal{M}$.
\end{proof}
We proceed a proof of Proposition \ref{Thm2}.
For simplicity,
we denote by $\mbf{R}_1$ (resp.\ $\mbf{R}_2$)
the former (resp.\ latter)
category appeared in the statement of Proposition \ref{Thm2}.
It is well-known (cf. \cite[Lemma 2.1.15]{Ki}) that the essential image of $\mbf{R}_1$
under the restriction functor
$\mrm{Rep}_{\mbb{Q}_p}(G_K)\to \mrm{Rep}_{\mbb{Q}_p}(G_{K_n})$
is contained in $\mbf{R}_2$.
Furthermore,
the restriction functor $\mbf{R}_1\to \mbf{R}_2$
is fully faithful
since $K_n$ is totally ramified over $K$.
Thus it suffices to show the essential surjectivity
of the restriction functor $\mbf{R}_1\to \mbf{R}_2$.
Let $V$ be a semi-stable $\mbb{Q}_p$-representations $V$ of $G_{K_n}$
with the property that $V|_{G_{K_{\infty}}}$ is isomorphic to
$T_{\mfS_K}(\mfM)\otimes_{\mbb{Z}_p}\mbb{Q}_p$
for some $\mfM\in \mrm{Mod}^r_{/\mfS_K}$.
Set $T:=T_{\mfS_K}(\mfM)$ and
take any $G_{K_n}$-stable $\mbb{Z}_p$-lattice $T'$ in $V$ such that $T\subset T'$.
There exists a $(\vphi,\hat{G}_{K_n})$-module $\hat{\mfN}$
of height $\le r$ over $\mfS_{K_n}$
such that $T'\simeq \hat{T}_{K_n}(\hat{\mfN})$.
Put $\mfM_n=\mfS_{K_n}\otimes_{\mfS_K}\mfM$,
which is a Kisin module of height $\le r$ over $\mfS_{K_n}$.
Since the functor
$T_{\mfS_{K_n}}$ from $\mrm{Mod}^r_{/\mfS_{K_n}}$
into $\mrm{Rep}_{\mbb{Z}_p}(G_{K_{\infty}})$
is fully faithful,
we obtain a morphism $\mfN\to \mfM_n$
which corresponds to the inclusion map $T\hookrightarrow T'$.
We note that it is injective and its cokernel $\mfM_n/\mfN$
is killed by a power of $p$
since $T'/T$ is $p$-power torsion.
Set
$\mcal{D}_n
:=S_{K_n}[1/p]\otimes_{\mfS_{K_n}}\mfN \simeq S_{K_n}[1/p]\otimes_{\mfS_{K_n}}\mfM_n$,
$\mcal{D}:=S_K[1/p]\otimes_{\mfS_K}\mfM$,
$\mcal{N}:=S_{K_n}\otimes_{\mfS_{K_n}}\mfN$,
$\mcal{M}_n:=S_{K_n}\otimes_{\mfS_{K_n}}\mfM_n$ and
$\mcal{M}:=S_K\otimes_{\mfS_K}\mfM$.
We define filtrations
$\mrm{Fil}^i\mcal{N}$,
$\mrm{Fil}^i\mcal{M}_n$ and
$\mrm{Fil}^i\mcal{M}$
as Lemma \ref{exercise2} (2).
Note that $\mcal{D}_n$
has a structure of a Breuil module which corresponds to $V$.
In particular, we have a Frobenius $\vphi_{\mcal{D}_n}$, a monodromy operator $N_{\mcal{D}_n}$
and a decreasing filtration $(\mrm{Fil}^i\mcal{D}_n)_{i\in \mbb{Z}}$
on $\mcal{D}_n$.
It is a result of \cite[\S 6]{Br} that we can equip
$D:=\mcal{D}_n/I_+S_{K_n}[1/p]\mcal{D}_n$
with a structure of filtered $(\vphi,N)$-module over $K_n$ which corresponds to $V$.
Now we recall the definition of this structure and also define some additional notations
for later use.
The Frobenius $\vphi_D$ and the monodromy $N_D$ on $D$ is defined by
$\vphi_D:=\vphi_{\mcal{D}_n}\ \mrm{mod}\ I_+S_{K_n}[1/p]\mcal{D}_n$
and $N_D:=N_{\mcal{D}_n}\ \mrm{mod}\ I_+S_{K_n}[1/p]\mcal{D}_n$.
We denote by $f_{\pi_n}$ and $f_{\pi}$
the natural projections
$\mcal{D}_n\twoheadrightarrow \mcal{D}_n/\mrm{Fil}^1S_{K_n}\mcal{D}_n$
and $\mcal{D}\twoheadrightarrow \mcal{D}/\mrm{Fil}^1S_K\mcal{D}$,
respectively.
There is a unique $\vphi$-compatible section $s\colon D\hookrightarrow \mcal{D}$
of the projection $\mcal{D}\twoheadrightarrow \mcal{D}/ I_+S_K[1/p]\mcal{D}\simeq D$.
Note that the composite $D\overset{s}{\hookrightarrow} \mcal{D}\hookrightarrow \mcal{D}_n$,
which is also denoted by $s$, is a section of the projection
$\mcal{D}_n\twoheadrightarrow \mcal{D}_n/ I_+S_{K_n}[1/p]\mcal{D}_n=D$.
Since the composite
$D\overset{s}{\to} \mcal{D}_n\overset{f_{\pi_n}}{\to} \mcal{D}_n/\mrm{Fil}^1S_{K_n}\mcal{D}_n$
(resp.\ $D\overset{s}{\to} \mcal{D}\overset{f_{\pi}}{\to} \mcal{D}/\mrm{Fil}^1S_K\mcal{D}$)
maps a basis of $D$ to a basis of
$\mcal{D}_n/\mrm{Fil}^1S_{K_n}\mcal{D}_n$
(resp.\ $\mcal{D}/\mrm{Fil}^1S_K\mcal{D}$),
we obtain an isomorphism
$D_{K_n}:=K_n\otimes_{W(k)[1/p]} D\overset{\sim}{\rightarrow}
\mcal{D}_n/\mrm{Fil}^1S_{K_n}\mcal{D}_n$
(resp.\ $D_K:=K\otimes_{W(k)[1/p]} D\overset{\sim}{\rightarrow}
\mcal{D}/\mrm{Fil}^1S_K\mcal{D}$).
By this isomorphism,
we identify $D_{K_n}$ (resp.\ $D_K$)
with $\mcal{D}_n/\mrm{Fil}^1S_{K_n}\mcal{D}_n$ (resp.\ $\mcal{D}/\mrm{Fil}^1S_K\mcal{D}$).
Then the filtration $(\mrm{Fil}^iD_{K_n})_{i\in \mbb{Z}}$ on
$D$ over $K_n$ is given by
$\mrm{Fil}^iD_{K_n}=f_{\pi_n}(\mrm{Fil}^i\mcal{D}_n)$.
We note that the filtered $(\vphi,N)$-module $D$ over $K_n$ defined above
is weakly admissible since $V$ is semi-stable
(see \cite[\S 3.4]{CF} for the definition of weakly admissibility).
Let $\cO_{K}$ and $\cO_{K_n}$ be rings of integers of $K$ and $K_n$, respectively.
We note that there exists a canonical isomorphism
$K_n\otimes_{\cO_{K_n}} f_{\pi_n}(\mrm{Fil}^i\mcal{M}_n)
\simeq K_n\otimes_{\cO_{K_n}} f_{\pi_n}(\mrm{Fil}^i\mcal{N})$ since
we have $p^c\mrm{Fil}^i\mcal{M}_n\subset \mrm{Fil}^i\mcal{N}\subset \mrm{Fil}^i\mcal{M}_n$
as submodules of $\mcal{D}_n$,
where $c\ge 0$ is an integer such that
$\mfM_n/\mfN$ is killed by $p^c$.
On the other hand,
the canonical isomorphism
$S_{K_n}[1/p]\otimes_{S_K[1/p]} \mcal{D}
\simeq \mcal{D}_n$ induces an isomorphism
$S_{K_n}\otimes_{S_K} \mrm{Fil}^i\mcal{M}
\simeq \mrm{Fil}^i\mcal{M}_n$
(cf.\ Lemma \ref{exercise2} (2)),
and it gives an isomorphism
$\cO_{K_n}\otimes_{\cO_K}f_{\pi}(\mrm{Fil}^i\mcal{M})\simeq
f_{\pi_n}(\mrm{Fil}^i\mcal{M}_n)$.
Furthermore, it follows from
\cite[Corollary 3.2.3]{Li2}
that a natural isomorphism
$\mcal{N}[1/p]\simeq \mcal{D}_n$
preserves filtrations, where $\mrm{Fil}^i(\mcal{N}[1/p]):=
(\mrm{Fil}^i\mcal{N})[1/p]$.
This induces
$K_n\otimes_{\cO_{K_n}} f_{\pi_n}(\mrm{Fil}^i\mcal{N})\simeq
\mrm{Fil}^iD_{K_n}$.
(Here, we remark that the argument of \S 3.2 of {\it loc.\ cit.} proceeds even for $p=2$.)
Therefore, if we define a decreasing filtration $(\mrm{Fil}^iD_K)_{i\in \mbb{Z}}$ on $D_K$ by
$\mrm{Fil}^iD_K:=K\otimes_{\cO_K} f_{\pi}(\mrm{Fil}^i\mcal{M})$,
then we have a canonical isomorphism
\begin{equation}
\label{canonical}
K_n\otimes_K \mrm{Fil}^iD_K
\simeq \mrm{Fil}^iD_{K_n}.
\end{equation}
Note that
we know $D_K=\mrm{Fil}^0D_K\supset \mrm{Fil}^1D_K
\supset \cdots \supset \mrm{Fil}^{r+1}D_K=0$.
Now we recall that
$D$ is weakly admissible as a filtered $(\vphi,N)$-module over $K_n$.
It follows from (\ref{canonical})
that $D$ is also weakly admissible
as a filtered $(\vphi,N)$-module over $K$,
and hence
the action of $G_{K_n}$ on $V$ extends to $G_K$
so that it is semi-stable over $K$.
Therefore, we showed that the restriction functor $\mbf{R}_1\to \mbf{R}_2$ is essentially surjective and
this finishes a proof of Proposition \ref{Thm2}.
\subsection{$\mcal{C}^r_{m_0}= \mcal{C}^r$}
\label{3.4}
Now we are ready to complete a proof of Theorem \ref{Main1'}.
We put $K_{p^{\infty}}=\bigcup_{i\ge 0} K(\zeta_{p^i})$ and
$G_{p^{\infty}}=\mrm{Gal}(K_{\infty}K_{p^{\infty}}/K_{p^{\infty}})\subset \hat{G}_K$.
We fix a topological generator $\tau$ of
$G_{p^{\infty}}$.
We start with the following lemma.
\begin{lemma}
(1) The field $K_{p^{\infty}}\cap K_{\infty}$ coincides with $K$ or $K_1$.
\noindent
(2) If $(p,m_0)\not=(2,1)$, then $K_{p^{\infty}}\cap K_{\infty}=K$.
\noindent
(3) If $m\ge 2$, then $K_{p^{\infty}}\cap K_{\infty}=K$.
\end{lemma}
\begin{proof}
The assertions (1) and (2)
are consequences of \cite[Lemma 5.1.2]{Li2} and \cite[Proposition 4.1.5]{Li3},
and so it is enough to show (3). We may assume $p=2$.
Assume that $K_{p^{\infty}}\cap K_{\infty}\not=K$.
Then we have $K_{p^{\infty}}\cap K_{\infty}=K_1$ by (1).
Since $K_1$ is contained in $K_{p^{\infty}}$,
we have $K_1\subset K(\zeta_{2^{\ell}})$ for $\ell>m$ large enough.
Since $m\ge 2$, the extension $K(\zeta_{2^{\ell}})/K(\zeta_{2^m})$
is cyclic and thus there exists only one quadratic subextension in it.
By definition of $m$, the extension $K(\zeta_{2^{m+1}})/K(\zeta_{2^m})$
is degree $2$.
Since the extension $K_1/K$ is totally ramified but $K(\zeta_{2^m})/K$ is unramified,
we see that the extension $K_1(\zeta_{2^m})/K(\zeta_{2^m})$
is also degree $2$.
Therefore, we have
$K_1(\zeta_{2^m})=K(\zeta_{2^{m+1}})$, and then
we have $\pi_1=x\zeta_{2^{m+1}}+y$ with $x,y\in K(\zeta_{2^m})$.
Let $\sigma$
be a non-trivial element in $\mrm{Gal}(K(\zeta_{2^{m+1}})/K(\zeta_{2^m}))$.
We have
$-\pi_1=\sigma(\pi_1)=x\sigma(\zeta_{2^{m+1}})+y=-x\zeta_{2^{m+1}}+y$.
Hence $\pi_1=x\zeta_{2^{m+1}}$ and we have $v(\pi_1)=v(x)$.
Here, $v$ is a valuation of $K(\zeta_{2^{m+1}})$
normalized by $v(K^{\times})=\mbb{Z}$, and we see $v(\pi_1)=1/2$.
Since the extension $K(\zeta_{2^m})/K$ is unramified,
we have $v(x)\in \mbb{Z}$ but this is a contradiction.
\end{proof}
If $(p,m_0)=(2,1)$ and $m=1$,
we have $m_0=m$ and then Theorem \ref{Main1'} follows immediately
from Lemma \ref{Lem:Main1'}.
Hence we may assume $(p,m_0)\not=(2,1)$ or $m\ge 2$.
Under this assumption, the above lemma implies
$K_{p^{\infty}}\cap K_{\infty}=K$.
In particular, we have $\hat{G}=G_{p^{\infty}} \rtimes H_K$
with the relation $g\sigma=\sigma^{\chi(g)}g$
for $g\in H_K$ and $\sigma\in G_{p^{\infty}}$.
Here, $\chi$ is the $p$-adic cyclotomic character.
Let $\hat{\mfM}=(\mfM,\vphi,\hat{G}_K)$ be an object of
${}_{\mrm{w}}\Mod^{r,\hat{G}_K}_{/\mfS_K}$ and put $T=\hat{T}_K(\hat{\mfM})$.
Our goal is to show that $T$ is an object of $\mcal{C}^r_{m_0}$.
We put $\mcal{D}=S_{K}[1/p]\otimes_{\vphi,\mfS_K} \mfM$
and $D=\mcal{D}/I_+S_K[1/p]\mcal{D}$.
Let $s\colon D\hookrightarrow \mcal{D}$ be a $\vphi$-equivariant
$W(k)[1/p]$-linear section of the projection $\mcal{D}\twoheadrightarrow D$
as before, and take a basis $e_1,\dots ,e_d$ of $s(D)$.
In $\mcal{R}_K\otimes_{W(k)[1/p]} s(D)=\mcal{R}_K\otimes_{\vphi,\mfS_K} \mfM$,
the $\tau$-action with respected to the basis $e_1,\dots ,e_d$ is given by
$\tau(e_1,\dots e_d)=(e_1,\dots ,e_d)A(t)$
for some matrix $A(t)\in GL_d(W(k)[1/p][\![t]\!])$.
Moreover, we have
$\hat{G}_K(s(D))\subset (\mcal{R}_K\cap W(k)[1/p][\![t]\!])\otimes_{W(k)[1/p]} s(D)$
by \cite[Lemma 7.1.3]{Li1}.
Here are two remarks.
The first one is that, the $a$-th power $A(t)^a$, a matrix with coefficients
in $W(k)[1/p][\![t]\!]$, of $A(t)$
is well-defined for any $a\in \mbb{Z}_p$.
This is because the Galois group
$G_{p^{\infty}}=\tau^{\mbb{Z}_p}
\subset \hat{G}_K$ acts continuously on $\mcal{R}_K\otimes_{W(k)[1/p]} s(D)$.
The second one is that, for any $g\in H_K$, we have $A(\chi(g)t)=A(t)^{\chi(g)}$
by the relation $g\tau=\tau^{\chi(g)}g$. In particular, we have
\begin{equation}
\label{Keyrel}
A(0)^{\chi(g)-1}=I_d.
\end{equation}
\noindent
Here, $I_d$ is the identity matrix.
With these notation,
it follows from the second paragraph of the proof of \cite[Theorem 4.2.2]{Li3} that
$T\otimes_{\mbb{Z}_p} \mbb{Q}_p$ is semi-stable over $K_{\ell}$
if $A(0)^{p^{\ell}}=I_d$.
\begin{lemma}
\label{lastlemma}
Let the notation be as above.
Then we have $A(0)^{p^{m_0}}=I_d$.
\end{lemma}
\begin{proof}
First we consider the case where $p$ is odd.
Since $H_K$ is canonically isomorphic to $\mrm{Gal}(K_{p^{\infty}}/K)$,
the image of the restriction to $H_K$ of
the $p$-adic cyclotomic character
$\chi\colon \hat{G}_K\to \mbb{Z}_p^{\times}$
is equal to
$$
\chi(\hat{G}_K)=C\times (1+p^n\mbb{Z}_p)
$$
\noindent
where $n$ is a positive integer and
$C\simeq \mrm{Gal}(K(\zeta_p)/K)$ is a finite cyclic group of order prime-to-$p$.
\noindent
{\it The case where $m_0\ge 1$:}
In this case, it is an easy exercise to check the equality $n=m_0$ and hence
we can choose $g\in H_K$ such that $\chi(g)=1+p^{m_0}$.
Thus the result follows by (\ref{Keyrel}).
\noindent
{\it The case where $m_0=0$:}
In this case, $C$ is non-trivial and hence
there exists an element $g\in H_K$
such that $x:=\chi(g)-1$ is a unit of $\mbb{Z}_p$.
By (\ref{Keyrel}), we have $A(0)^x=I_d$, and then
we obtain $A(0)=I_d$.
Next we consider the case where $p=2$.
\noindent
{\it The case where $m_0\ge 2$:}
This case is clear
since we have $\chi(H_K)=\chi(\hat{G}_K)=1+2^{m_0}\mbb{Z}_2$.
\noindent
{\it The case where $m_0=1$:}
In this case, $\chi\ \mrm{mod}\ 4$ is not trivial.
Hence there exists
$g\in H_K$ such that $\chi(g)=3+4x$ for some $x\in \mbb{Z}_2$.
By (\ref{Keyrel}),
we have $A(0)^{2+4x}=I_d$.
Since $1+2x$ is a unit of $\mbb{Z}_2$,
this gives the desired equation $A(0)^2=I_d$.
\end{proof}
\noindent
By the above lemma, we obtain the fact that
$T\otimes_{\mbb{Z}_p}\mbb{Q}_p$ is semi-stable over $K_{m_0}$.
On the other hand, we have already shown
that $\mcal{C}^r$ is a subcategory of $\mcal{C}^r_{m}$.
Thus there exists a semi-stable $\mbb{Q}_p$-representation $V$ of $G_K$
whose restriction to $G_{K_m}$ is isomorphic to $T\otimes_{\mbb{Z}_p} \mbb{Q}_p$.
Moreover, Proposition \ref{totst} implies that $V$ and $T\otimes_{\mbb{Z}_p} \mbb{Q}_p$ are isomorphic
as representations of $G_{K_{m_0}}$
since they are semi-stable over $K_{m_0}$.
Therefore, we conclude that $T$ is an object of the category $\mcal{C}^r_{m_0}$.
This is the end of a proof of Theorem \ref{Main1'}.
\subsection{Conclusions and more}
\subsubsection{}
We summarize our results here.
For any finite extension $L/K$,
we denote by $\mrm{Rep}^{r,L\mathchar`-\mrm{st}}_{\mbb{Z}_p}(G_K)$ the category
of free $\mbb{Z}_p$-representations $T$ of $G_K$
which is semi-stable over $L$ with Hodge-Tate weights in $[0,r]$.
We define $\mcal{C}^r_n$ to be the category of
free $\mbb{Z}_p$-representations $T$ of $G_K$ which satisfies the following property:
there exists a semi-stable $\mbb{Q}_p$-representation $V$ of $G_K$
with Hodge-Tate weights in $[0,r]$
such that $T\otimes_{\mbb{Z}_p}\mbb{Q}_p$
is isomorphic to $V$ as representations of $G_{K_n}$.
By definition $\mcal{C}^r_n$ is a full subcategory of
$\mrm{Rep}^{r,K_n\mathchar`-\mrm{st}}_{\mbb{Z}_p}(G_K)$.
Put $m_0=\mrm{max}\{i\ge 0 \mid \zeta_{p^i}\in K \}$ and
$m=\mrm{max}\{i\ge 0 \mid \zeta_{p^i}\in K^{\mrm{ur}} \}$.
We have
$\mrm{Rep}^{r,K_m\mathchar`-\mrm{st}}_{\mbb{Z}_p}(G_K)
=\bigcup_{n\ge 0} \mrm{Rep}^{r,K_n\mathchar`-\mrm{st}}_{\mbb{Z}_p}(G_K)$,
$\mcal{C}^r_m=\bigcup_{n\ge 0} \mcal{C}^r_n$
(see Remark \ref{Rem:Liu}).
Results of \cite{Li3} and this note give the following diagram
(here, ``$\subset$'' implies an inclusion):
\begin{center}
$\displaystyle \xymatrix{
&
& \mcal{C}^r_m \ar^{\subset \quad \qquad}[r]
& \mrm{Rep}^{r,K_m\mathchar`-\mrm{st}}_{\mbb{Z}_p}(G_K)
\\
{}_{\mrm{w}}\Mod^{r,\hat{G}_K}_{/\mfS_K}
\ar^{\sim}@{->}_{\hat{T}_K}[rr]
&
& \mcal{C}^r_{m_0} \ar^{\cup}[u]. \ar^{\subset \quad \qquad}[r]
& \mrm{Rep}^{r,K_{m_0}\mathchar`-\mrm{st}}_{\mbb{Z}_p}(G_K) \ar^{\cup}[u]
\\
\Mod^{r,\hat{G}_K}_{/\mfS_K}
\ar^{\cup}[u] \ar^{\sim}_{\hat{T}_K}[rr]
&
&
\mcal{C}^r_{0} \ar^{\cup}[u]. \ar@{=}[r]
&
\mrm{Rep}^{r,K\mathchar`-\mrm{st}}_{\mbb{Z}_p}(G_K) \ar^{\cup}[u]
}$
\end{center}
\subsubsection{}
We give a few remarks for the above diagram.
Clearly, all the categories in the middle and right vertical lines are same
if $m=0$.
On the other hand, if $m \ge 1$,
inclusion relations between them are described as follows:
\begin{proposition}
\label{prop:rem}
Suppose $m\ge 1$.
\noindent
(1) Suppose $1\le n\le m$.
Then the category $\mcal{C}^r_n$ is strictly larger than
$\mcal{C}^r_{n-1}$.
In particular, the category
$\mrm{Rep}^{r,K_{n}\mathchar`-\mrm{st}}_{\mbb{Z}_p}(G_K)$
is strictly larger than
$\mrm{Rep}^{r,K_{n-1}\mathchar`-\mrm{st}}_{\mbb{Z}_p}(G_K)$.
\noindent
(2) Suppose $n,r\ge 1$.
Then the category
$\mrm{Rep}^{r,K_n\mathchar`-\mrm{st}}_{\mbb{Z}_p}(G_K)$
is strictly larger than
$\mcal{C}^r_n$.
\noindent
(3) Suppose $n\ge 0$.
Then we have
$\mcal{C}^0_n=\mrm{Rep}^{0,K_n\mathchar`-\mrm{st}}_{\mbb{Z}_p}(G_K)$.
\end{proposition}
\begin{proof}
(1) Let $T$ be the induced representation of the rank one trivial $\mbb{Z}_p$-representation
of $G_{K_n(\zeta_{p^n})}$ to $G_K$,
which is an Artin representation.
The splitting field of $T$ is $K_n(\zeta_{p^n})$.
Since $n\le m$, the extension
$K_n(\zeta_{p^n})/K_n$ is unramified.
Thus $T$ is crystalline over $K_n$.
On the other hand,
$T$ is not crystalline over $K_{n-1}$ since the extension
$K_n(\zeta_{p^n})/K_{n-1}$, the splitting field of $T|_{K_{n-1}}$, is not unramified.
(This finishes a proof of the latter assertion.)
Let $\rho_T\colon G_K\to GL_{\mbb{Z}_p}(T)\simeq GL_d(\mbb{Z}_p)$
be the continuous homomorphism associated with $T$,
where $d$ is the $\mbb{Z}_p$-rank of $T$.
By the assumption $n\le m$,
we know that $K(\zeta_{p^n})\cap K_n=K$ and thus we can define
a continuous homomorphism $\rho_{T'}\colon G_K\to GL_d(\mbb{Z}_p)$
by the composite
$G_K\twoheadrightarrow \mrm{Gal}(K(\zeta_{p^n})/K)\simeq \mrm{Gal}(K_n(\zeta_{p^n})/K_n)
\overset{\rho_T}{\hookrightarrow} GL_d(\mbb{Z}_p)$.
Let $T'$ be the free $\mbb{Z}_p$-module of rank $d$ equipped with a
$G_K$-action by $\rho_{T'}$.
Then $T'$ is isomorphic to $T$ as representations of $G_{K_n}$
and furthermore it is crystalline over $K$.
It follows that $T$ is an object of $\mcal{C}^r_n$.
\noindent
(2) Since $m\ge 1$, we know that $L:=K(\zeta_p)$ is an unramified extension of
$K$. Thus $\pi_K$ is a uniformizer of $L$.
Consider notations
$\mfS_L, S_L,\dots $ (resp.\ $\mfS_{L_1}, S_{L_1},\dots$)
with respect to the uniformizer $\pi_K$ (resp.\ $\pi_{K,1}$)
of $L$ (resp.\ $L_1$)
and the system $(\pi_{K,n})_{n\ge 0}$ (resp.\ $(\pi_{K,n+1})_{n\ge 0}$).
Let $\mfM$ be the rank-$2$ free Kisin module over $\mfS_{L_1}$
of height $1$ given by
$\vphi(e_1,e_2)=(e_1,e_2)\begin{pmatrix}1 & u_{L_1} \\ 0 & E_{L_1}(u_{L_1})\end{pmatrix}$,
where $\{e_1,e_2\}$ is a basis of $\mfM$.
Since $\mfM$ is of height $1$, there exists a
$G_{L_1}$-stable $\mbb{Z}_p$-lattice $T$ in a
crystalline $\mbb{Q}_p$-representation of $G_{L_1}$, coming
from a $p$-divisible group over the integer ring of $L_1$.
We see that $\tilde{T}:=\mrm{Ind}^{G_K}_{G_{L_1}}T$ is crystalline over $L_1$.
Since $L_1$ is unramified over $K_1$,
$\tilde{T}$ is in fact crystalline over $K_1$.
Furthermore, $\tilde{T}$ does not come from Kisin modules over $\mfS_K$
(that is, $\tilde{T}|_{G_{K_{\infty}}}$ is not isomorphic to $T_{\mfS_K}(\mfN)$ for
any Kisin module $\mfN$ over $\mfS_K$).
To check this, it suffices to show that $\tilde{T}$ does not
come from Kisin modules over $\mfS_L$.
Essentially, this has been already shown in \cite[Example 4.2.3]{Li3}.
Therefore, Corollary \ref{Main3} implies that $\tilde{T}$
is not an object of $\mcal{C}^r_n$.
\noindent
(3) We may suppose $n\le m$.
Take any object $T$ of $\mrm{Rep}^{0,K_n\mathchar`-\mrm{st}}_{\mbb{Z}_p}(G_K)$.
Since $T$ has only one Hodge-Tate weight zero,
the condition $T|_{G_{K_n}}$ is semi-stable implies that $T|_{G_{K_n}}$ is unramified.
Thus if we denote by $K_T$ the splitting field of $T$,
then $K_TK_n$
is unramified over $K_n$.
First we consider the case where $K_T$ contains $\zeta_{p^n}$.
In this case, we follow the idea given in the proof of (1).
Denote by $K'$ the maximum unramified subextension
of $K_TK_n$ over $K$.
Since $K_T$ contains $\zeta_{p^n}$,
$K_TK_n/K$ is a Galois extension and
hence $K'/K$ is also Galois.
Furthermore, it is not difficult to check that the equality $K_TK_n=K'K_n$ holds.
Let $\rho_T\colon G_K\to GL_{\mbb{Z}_p}(T)\simeq GL_d(\mbb{Z}_p)$
be the continuous homomorphism associated with $T$,
where $d$ is the $\mbb{Z}_p$-rank of $T$,
and define a continuous homomorphism $\rho_{T'}\colon G_K\to GL_d(\mbb{Z}_p)$
by the composite
$G_K\twoheadrightarrow \mrm{Gal}(K'/K)\simeq \mrm{Gal}(K_TK_n/K_n)
\overset{\rho_T}{\hookrightarrow} GL_d(\mbb{Z}_p)$.
Let $T'$ be the free $\mbb{Z}_p$-module of rank $d$ equipped with a
$G_K$-action by $\rho_{T'}$.
Then $T'$ is isomorphic to $T$ as representations of $G_{K_n}$
and furthermore, $T'$ is crystalline over $K$.
It follows that $T$ is an object of $\mcal{C}^0_n$.
Next we consider the general case.
Denote by $T_0$ the induced representation of the rank one trivial $\mbb{Z}_p$-representation
of $G_{K(\zeta_{p^n})}$ to $G_K$.
We define a free $\mbb{Z}_p$-representation $\tilde{T}$ of $G_K$
by $\tilde{T}:=T\oplus T_0$.
The splitting fields of $\tilde{T}$ and $T_0$ are
equal to $K_{\tilde{T}}:=K_T(\zeta_{p^n})$ and $K(\zeta_{p^n})$,
respectively.
The representations $\tilde{T}$ and $T_0$ are objects of
$\mrm{Rep}^{0,K_n\mathchar`-\mrm{st}}_{\mbb{Z}_p}(G_K)$.
Moreover, the above argument implies that
$\tilde{T}$ and $T_0$ are contained in $\mcal{C}^0_n$.
Therefore, there exist objects $\tilde{\mfM}$ and $\mfM_0$ of
$\mrm{Mod}^r_{/\mfS_K}$ such that
$T_{\mfS_K}(\tilde{\mfM})=\tilde{T}|_{G_{K_{\infty}}}$ and $T_{\mfS_K}(\mfM_0)=T_0|_{G_{K_{\infty}}}$.
Now we recall that the functor $T_{\mfS_K}$ is fully faithful.
If we denote by
$\mfrak{f}\colon \mfM_0\to \tilde{\mfM}$ a (unique) morphism of $\vphi$-modules over $\mfS_K$
corresponding to the natural projection $\tilde{T}\twoheadrightarrow T_0$,
then we obtain a split exact sequence
$0\to \mfM_0\overset{\mfrak{f}}{\to} \tilde{\mfM}\to \mfM\to 0$
of $\vphi$-modules over $\mfS_K$.
Here, $\mfM$ is the cokernel of $\mfrak{f}$, which is a finitely generated $\mfS_K$-module.
Since $\mfM$ is a direct summand of $\tilde{\mfM}$,
it is a projective $\mfS_K$-module. This implies that $\mfM$ is a free $\mfS_K$-module.
(Note that, for a finitely generated $\mfS_K$-module,
it is projective over $\mfS_K$ if and only if it is free $\mfS_K$ by Nakayama's lemma.)
Furthermore, $\mfM$ is of height $0$ and hence it is an object of $\mrm{Mod}^0_{/\mfS_K}$.
Since the functor $T_{\mfS_K}$ is exact,
we obtain
$T_{\mfS_K}(\mfM)
=\mrm{ker}(T_{\mfS_K}(\tilde{\mfM})\overset{T_{\mfS_K}(\mfrak{f})}{\longrightarrow} T_{\mfS_K}(\mfM_0))
=\mrm{ker}(\tilde{T}\twoheadrightarrow T_0)=T$.
Therefore, $T$ is an object of $\mcal{C}^0_n$
by Corollary \ref{Main3}.
\end{proof}
\subsubsection{}
Assume that $m\ge 1$.
Let $n\ge 1$ be an integer and $T$ an object of the category $\mcal{C}^r_n$.
By definition of $\mcal{C}^r_n$, we have a (unique) semi-stable $\mbb{Q}_p$-representation
$V_T$ of $G_K$
with the property that it is isomorphic to $T\otimes_{\mbb{Z}_p} \mbb{Q}_p$
as representations of $G_{K_n}$.
It is not clear whether
$T$ is stable under the $G_K$-action of $V_T$ for any $T$ or not.
Such a stability problem of Galois actions may sometimes cause obstructions in integral theory,
and so the following question should be naturally considered.
\begin{question}
\label{question2}
Let the notation be as above.
Does the $G_K$-action of $V_T$ preserves $T$ for any $T$?
\end{question}
We end this paper by showing an answer to this question.
\begin{proposition}
(1) If $r=0$, then Question \ref{question2}
has an affirmative answer.
\noindent
(2) If $r\ge 1$, then Question \ref{question2}
has a negative answer.
\noindent
(3) Let the notation be as above. Suppose $e(r-1)<p-1$
where $e$ is the absolute ramification index of $K$.
If $T$ is potentially crystalline, then the $G_K$-action of $V_T$ preserves $T$.
Moreover, any $G_{K_{\infty}}$-stable $\mbb{Z}_p$-lattice of $V_T$
is stable under the $G_K$-action.
\end{proposition}
\begin{proof}
(1) (This is a special case of (3).)
The result easily follows from the fact that
$T$ as in the question is unramified in this case, and
that $G_{K_n}$ and the inertia subgroup of $G_K$ generate $G_K$.
\noindent
(2) Our goal is to construct an example which gives a negative answer to the question.
First we consider the case where
$1\le n\le m_0$.
Let $E_{\pi}$ be the Tate curve over $K$ associated to $\pi$.
Choose a basis $\{\mbf{e},\ \mbf{f}\}$ of the $p$-adic Tate module $V=V_p(E_{\pi})$
of $E_{\pi}$ such that the $G_K$-action on $V$ with respective to this basis is given by
$$
g\mapsto
\begin{pmatrix}
\chi(g) & c(g)\\
0 & 1
\end{pmatrix}.
$$
Here, $\chi\colon G_K\to \mbb{Z}^{\times}_p$ is the $p$-adic cyclotomic character
and $c\colon G_K\to \mbb{Z}_p$ is a map defined by
$g(\pi_{K,{\ell}})=\zeta^{c(g)}_{p^{\ell}}\pi_{K,{\ell}}$ for any $g\in G_K$ and $\ell\ge 1$.
Let $T_0$ be the free $\mbb{Z}_p$-submodule of $V$ generated by
$p^n\mbf{e}$ and $\mbf{f}$.
This is $G_{K_n}$-stable but not $G_K$-stable in $V$.
Now we put $T=\mrm{Ind}^{G_K}_{G_{K_n}}T_0$ and choose a
set $S\subset G_K$ of representatives of the quotient $G_K/G_{K_n}$.
Since $K_n/K$ is Galois, $T|_{G_{K_n}}$ is of the form $\oplus_{\sigma\in S}\ T_{0,\sigma}$.
Here, $T_{0,\sigma}$ is just $T_0$ as a $\mbb{Z}_p$-module and is
equipped with a $\sigma$-twisted $G_{K_n}$-action, that is, $g.x:=(\sigma^{-1} g \sigma)(x)$
for $g\in G_{K_n}$ and $x\in T_{0,\sigma}$.
We define elements $\mbf{e}_{\sigma}$ and $\mbf{f}_{\sigma}$
of $T_{0,\sigma}$
by $\mbf{e}_{\sigma}:=p^n\mbf{e}$ and
$\mbf{f}_{\sigma}:=\mbf{f}$.
We define $V_{0,\sigma}:=T_{0,\sigma}\otimes_{\mbb{Z}_p} \mbb{Q}_p$
and extend the $G_{K_n}$-action on $V_{0,\sigma}$ to
$G_K$ by
$$
g(\mbf{e}_{\sigma},\mbf{f}_{\sigma})=(\mbf{e}_{\sigma},\mbf{f}_{\sigma})
\begin{pmatrix}
\chi(g) & c(\sigma^{-1}g\sigma)/p^n\\
0 & 1
\end{pmatrix}
$$
for $g\in G_K$.
By definition the $G_K$-action on $V_{0,\sigma}$
does not preserve $T_{0,\sigma}$. It is not difficult to check that
$V_{0,\sigma}$ is a semi-stable $\mbb{Q}_p$-representation of $G_K$
with Hodge-Tate weights $\{0,1\}$.
If we put $V_T=\oplus_{\sigma\in S} V_{0,\sigma}$,
then we have the followings:
\begin{itemize}
\item $V_T$ is semi-stable over $K$ with Hodge-Tate weights $\{0,1\}$,
\item the natural isomorphism $V_T\simeq T\otimes_{\mbb{Z}_p} \mbb{Q}_p$
is compatible with $G_{K_n}$-actions, and
\item the $G_K$-action on $V_T$ does not preserve $T$.
\end{itemize}
This gives a negative answer to Question \ref{question}
in the case $1\le n\le m_0$.
Next we consider a general case. We may suppose $n=m$.
Put $K'=K(\zeta_{p^m})$ and $K'_m=K_mK'$.
Then $K'$ is an unramified Galois extension of $K$
and $\mrm{max}\{i\ge 0 \mid \zeta_{p^i}\in K' \}=m$.
Thus the above argument shows that
there exists a free $\mbb{Z}_p$-representation $T'$
of $G_{K'}$ and a semi-stable $\mbb{Q}_p$-representation $V_{T'}$ of $G_{K'}$
with Hodge-Tate weights $\{0,1\}$
which satisfies the followings:
\begin{itemize}
\item there exists an isomorphism
$V_{T'}\simeq T'\otimes_{\mbb{Z}_p} \mbb{Q}_p$
of $G_{K'_m}$-representations, and
\item the $G_{K'}$-action on $V_{T'}$ does not preserve $T'$.
\end{itemize}
We regard $T'$ as a $\mbb{Z}_p$-lattice of $V_{T'}$.
We define $T:=\mrm{Ind}^{G_K}_{G_{K'}}T'$ and $V_T:=\mrm{Ind}^{G_K}_{G_{K'}}V_{T'}$.
Note that $T$ is naturally regarded as a $\mbb{Z}_p$-lattice of $V$.
By definition, the $G_{K'}$-action on $V_T$ does not preserve $T$.
In particular, the same holds also for the $G_K$-action.
Since $K'/K$ is unramified, we see that $V_T$
is semi-stable over $K$.
Furthermore,
by Mackey's formula, we have natural isomorphisms
$T\otimes_{\mbb{Z}_p}\mbb{Q}_p
\simeq \mrm{Ind}^{G_{K_m}}_{G_{K'_m}}(T'\otimes_{\mbb{Z}_p}\mbb{Q}_p)
\simeq \mrm{Ind}^{G_{K_m}}_{G_{K'_m}}V_{T'}
\simeq V_T
$
of representations of $G_{K_m}$.
Therefore, we conclude that
Question \ref{question2} has a negative answer for any $n\ge 1$.
\noindent
(3) This is a special case of \cite[Corollary 4.20]{Oz}.
\end{proof}
|
\section{Introduction}
The currently accepted view is that the cosmic rays are produced in active astrophysical objects: supernovae, gamma-ray bursts, active stars in binary systems, pulsars, active galactic nuclei, quasars, radio galaxies, and large-scale structure shocks. Possible sources of cosmic rays in the Galaxy include supernova explosions, pulsars and the Galactic nucleus, which contains a super-massive black hole. Traditional models of stochastic acceleration assume the interaction of particles with magnetic fields, according to the Fermi mechanisms~\cite{Fermi1949}, where the particles would be accelerated in collisions with magnetic moving clouds. In principle, this same mechanism, with few changes, can accelerate particles in shock waves in supernovae, gamma-ray bursts, Wolf-Rayet star winds, active galactic nuclei, radio galaxies and other sites. This paper explores a model originally proposed in reference~\cite{Stanev_Biermann_Gaisser_1993} in which a combination of four main components is used to explain the cosmic ray spectrum. Figure~\ref{fig:theory:original} shows a schematic picture of the main features of the model. The details of the model are discussed in the next section. It has been previously shown in reference~\cite{Biermann_Vitor_2012} that this model is able to describe the total flux of cosmic rays up to \energyEV{20} using one extra parameter: an energy shift factor of 2800 caused by re-acceleration of galactic seed particles in the jets.
The calculations presented here extend the validity of the model in two ways. Firstly, an analysis is presented of the cosmic ray flux with energies between \energy{10} and \energyEV{15}. The recently published data from AMS-02~\cite{AMS-02_ICRC_2013} and CREAM~\cite{CREAM_2041-8205-714-1-L89, CREAM_0004-637X-707-1-593} are used. These experiments are able to discriminate with high precision the individual elements of the cosmic ray composition, measuring the flux of each particle type. Given the high statistics achieved by these space and balloon-borne experiments, the data constrain severely the contribution of each particle to the total flux. It is shown here for the first time how this model describes very well the energy range from \energy{10} to \energyEV{15}, which includes the transition regime of space and balloon experiments to ground-based observatories. This first analysis represents an extension in the energy range for which this model is able to describe the measured total flux of cosmic rays.
In a second analysis, we show the agreement of the model concerning the flux of each element: hydrogen to iron nuclei. For energies below \energyEV{15} the analysis can be done taking into account the individual flux measured by AMS and CREAM for each element. For energies above \energyEV{15} the analysis is done through considering indirect composition measurements. The data from KASCADE and KASCADE-Grande experiments are compared to the model predictions fixed by the space and balloon experiments. It is shown that a continuation extension of the AMS and CREAM (\energy{10} to \energyEV{14}) to KASCADE and KASCADE-Grande (\energy{15} to \energyEV{18}) data is very hard to achieve due to the high flux of heavy elements measured by KASCADE-Grande in the energy range from \energy{17} to \energyEV{18}. The model prediction is also compared to the evolution of the mean depth of the shower maximum (\xmax) measured by the Pierre Auger Observatory~\cite{bib:auger:nim}.
Section~\ref{sec:method} reviews the original model and its tests. Section~\ref{sec:spectra} shows the first analysis in which the model is extended to low energies and section~\ref{sec:mass} shows the analysis regarding the cosmic ray composition. Section~\ref{sec:conclusion} summarizes the main conclusions of the paper.
\section{The original model}
\label{sec:method}
Figure~\ref{fig:theory:original} shows the main features of the original model which was proposed to explain the observed features of cosmic rays in the energy range from $10^{14}$ to $10^{18}$~eV. The model is based on three (1, 2 and 3) galactic and one (4) extragalactic component. The phenomena contributing to the acceleration of particles are: a) supernova explosions into the interstellar medium, b) supernova explosions into the stellar wind, and c) powerful jets of radio-galaxies. In summary, supernova explosions generate the galactic cosmic rays up to $10^{17-18}$ eV and radio-galaxies jets re-accelerate galactic cosmic rays to the highest energies $10^{18-20}$ eV. In this scenario, the main source of extragalactic cosmic rays is Cen A.
Label 1 in figure~\ref{fig:theory:original} is the resulting energy spectrum outcome of supernova explosions into the interstellar medium. The maximum energy that a cosmic ray can be accelerated in a supernova shock taking into account the Sedov expansion into the interstellar medium was calculated in reference~\cite{Lagage_Cesarsky_1983}. The produced spectrum has index value proposed to be around $-2.75$ and an exponential cutoff. This component can be written as:
\begin{equation}
(dN/dE)_1 = A_1 \cdot E^{-2.75} \cdot \exp{-E/E_1^{cutoff}},
\end{equation}
where $A_1$ is the normalization of the flux and $E_1^{cutoff}$ is the cutoff energy. The cutoff energy is predicted to be proportional to charge ($E_1^{cutoff} \propto Z$).
Label 2 in figure~\ref{fig:theory:original} is the resulting energy spectrum outcome of supernova explosions into the stellar wind, like a Wolf-Rayet star explosion. The produced spectrum has an index around $-2.67$ for energies smaller than $E_2^{break}$ and index around $-3.07$ for energies smaller than $E_2^{cutoff}$ which determines the exponential cutoff of the flux. $E_2^{break}$ and $E_2^{cutoff}$ are both predicted to be proportional to charge. The existence of two regimes is due to the dependence of the acceleration efficiency to the particle drift gain~\cite{Stanev_Biermann_Gaisser_1993}. This component can be written as:
\begin{equation}
(dN/dE)_2 = \left\{ \begin{array}{ll}
A_2 \cdot E^{-2.67} & \mbox{ if $E < E_2^{break}$} \\
B_2 \cdot E^{-3.07} \cdot \exp{ -E/E_2^{cutoff} } & \mbox{ if $E > E_2^{break}$}
\end{array} \right.
\end{equation}
where $A_2$ and $B_2$ are normalization of the flux.
Label 3 in figure~\ref{fig:theory:original} is an extra component resulting from the outcome of a supernova explosions into the stellar wind. In the final stage of the very massive stars there is a connection between rotation and magnetic field. This magneto-rotational mechanism for massive stars explosions was first proposed by Bisnovatyi-Kogan~\cite{Bisnovatyi-Kogan-1970,Bisnovatyi-Kogan-2007} and seems consistent with the energy/charge ratio for the heavy elements~\cite{PhysRevLett.103.061101,2041-8205-710-1-L53,0004-637X-725-1-184,Gupta-Nath-Biermann-2013}. This connection produces a polar cap component relevant in the region where the radial field $B_r\sim 1/r^2$ dominates. The energy spectrum index was predicted to be around $-2.33$ with a sharp cutoff at $E_3^{cutoff}$:
\begin{equation}
(dN/dE)_3 = \begin{array}{ll} A_3 \cdot E^{-2.33} & \mbox{ if $E < E_3^{cutoff}$} \end{array}
\end{equation}
where $A_3$ is the normalization of the flux and $E_3^{cutoff}$ is the cutoff energy. The original model predicts $E_2^{break} = E_3^{cutoff}$.
This model proposal has used the concept, that transport of cosmic rays is governed by Kolmogorov turbulence, and that the secondary particles are produced in interactions near the source~\cite{PhysRevLett.103.061101,bib:b:2001}.
Label 4 in figure~\ref{fig:theory:original} is an extragalactic component proposed to explain the highest energy range. Radio Galaxies such as the Fanaroff-Riley class II have hot spots at the end of linear radio features, which are considered to be highly collimated plasma jets. The evolution of these powerful radio galaxies can explain the spectrum to energies above \energyEV{18}~\cite{Rachen_Biermann_1993_1,Rachen_Biermann_1993_2}. The predicted index of the generated energy spectrum is approximately $-2$.
It has been shown that the same mechanism rescaled in energy by a factor of 2800 can accelerate particles up to \energyEV{20}~\cite{Biermann_Vitor_2012}. The argument was based on the re-acceleration of the original galactic seeds in the jets of radio galaxies. Interpretation of observations to derive the central Lorentz factor required in the relativistic jets emanating from near super-massive black holes in Active Galactic Nuclei (AGN) suggest values of up to $\gamma_j \, = \, 100$~\cite{bib:gopal:2014,bib:kellermann}. As Gallant \& Achterberg~\cite{MNR:MNR2566} as well as~\cite{MNR:MNR4851} have shown, the acceleration of particles in relativistic shocks, clearly possible in AGN jets up to maximally the Lorentz factor of the jet itself, gives an increase in energy/momentum by $\gamma_j^2$ in a single first step, and for all subsequent steps considerably less. So we use here what could be called the ``single kick approximation", namely only that single first step. Observations suggest that jets are energized intermittently (see, e.g., the radio galaxy Her A,~\cite{MNR:MNR6469}). Such extreme Lorentz factors may be possible in the ``working surface" of a freshly energized jet.
\section{Comparison of the model to measured energy spectra of elements}
\label{sec:spectra}
In previous publications, the predictions of the original model~\cite{Stanev_Biermann_Gaisser_1993} and the predictions of its extrapolation to the highest energies~\cite{Biermann_Vitor_2012} were compared to the total flux of cosmic ray particles measured by several experiments. These comparisons have been able to show the general validity of the model. Nevertheless they have not been able to remove the intrinsic degeneracy of the model concerning the abundance of each element. If only the sum of all elements is verified, several predictions of the model, for instance, rigidity dependencies cannot be tested. Besides that, the large number of free parameters to fit the total flux reduces the significance of the final results. In this paper, the tests are done using the most up-to-date spectrum of each element as measured by several experiments. The intention of the analysis presented in this section is to remove the freedom in describing the total flux as presented in the previous studies.
The original model flux is dominated by component 2 see figure~\ref{fig:theory:original}. Component 3 causes a break in spectrum which could be used to discriminate the model explored here from other traditional models, i.e., Peters cycles~\cite{bib:peter:cycles,bib:stanev:peter:cycles}. The step in the energy spectrum caused by components 1 and 2 requires a very precise measurement of the energy spectrum of each element in order to be tested.
Data from AMS-02~\cite{AMS-02_ICRC_2013} and CREAM~\cite{CREAM_2041-8205-714-1-L89, CREAM_0004-637X-707-1-593} have been used to validate the model in the energy range from \energy{10} $<E<$ \energyEV{15}. Both experiments published the H and He flux as shown in~\cref{fig:spectrum:h,fig:spectrum:he}. The data from both experiments offers a very hard constraint to the normalization constants ($A_1$) for H ($A_1^H$) and He ($A_1^{He}$) elements. Once these parameters are set to the AMS-02 and CREAM data the relative contribution of these elements to the total flux are kept constant in the entire energy range studied in this paper (\energy{10} $<E<$ \energyEV{20}). Propagation effects, i.e., photo-nuclear disintegration might change the relative contribution of each element arriving on Earth at the highest energies $E>10^{17}$ eV.
The energy cutoff step at $E_2^{H-break}$ cannot be determined due to the lack of data in the energy range between \energy{14} and \energyEV{15}. However, the data measured by KASCADE~\cite{bib:kascade:pr:knee:1,bib:kascade:pr:knee:2} with energy above \energyEV{15} can be seen together with the AMS-02 and CREAM data for H in figure~\ref{fig:spectrum:h}. The figure the agreement in the relative flux of H as measured by the three experiments is clear from the figure. The agreement of the model to the data is also remarkable. The data from KASCADE was used to calculate $E_2^{H-cutoff} = 1.96 \times 10^{15}$ eV which is the energy of the knee of Hydrogen. Using the rigidity dependence of the model $E_2^{cutoff-e} = Z \times E_2^{H-cutoff}$ the energy breaks of other elements are determined. Figure~\ref{fig:spectrum:h} also shows the data of the KASCADE-Grande experiment~\cite{bib:kascade:grande:thesis, bib:kascade:grande:icrc2011}. The model is able to describe the connection between the KASCADE and KASCADE-Grande data which shows a continuous reduction of the flux up to $3\times 10^{16}$ eV. Beyond this energy, the KASCADE-Grande data suggest an flattening of the proton flux~\cite{bib:kascade:grande:ankle}. This energy sets the change of predominance from component 2 to component 4 as show in figure~\ref{fig:theory:original}. Again the rigidity dependency model is used to set the energy beyond which the extragalactic flux is predominant.
The rigidity dependency and the relative flux of CNO, NeS and ClMn can be verified and adjusted using the KASCADE and KASCADE-Grande data~\cite{bib:kascade:grande:thesis}. Figure~\ref{fig:spectrum:intermediate} shows the energy spectrum of intermediate mass particles as measured by KASCADE and KASCADE-Grande experiments. The lines shown for CNO, NeS and ClMn are the result of the fit of the original model to the data. Since the energy breaks have been set by fitting the H spectrum and using the rigidity model dependency, the only free parameters in the fit are the normalization of each element flux. The agreement of the model to the data is very good. The spikes in the flux of each element caused by $E_2^{break}$ are visible in the sum of all intermediate elements with small amplitude. Unfortunately the resolution of the measurement is not enough to test the small spikes.
Finally the model was compared to the iron flux measured by CREAM, KASCADE and KASCADE-Grande. Figure~\ref{fig:spectrum:iron} shows the fit of the model to the data considering two approaches. First the rigidity dependency of the energy cutoff ($E_2^{cutoff}$) was kept ($E_2^{cutoff-Fe} = 26 \times E_2^{cutoff-H}$) as shown by the dashed line. The label ``This model - Rigidity Dependency'' is used to identify the hypothesis in which $E_2^{cutoff-e} = Z \times E_2^{cutoff-H}$ for all elements. It is clear that in this case the model does not describe the KASCADE and KASCADE-Grande data. If the rigidity dependency is not kept and $E_2^{cutoff-Fe}$ is allowed to vary, the model describes fairly well the data as shown by the full line in figure~\ref{fig:spectrum:iron}. In this case the fit leads to $E_2^{cutoff-Fe} = 2.54 \times 10^{17}$ eV. The label ``This model - Fe excess'' is used to identify the hypothesis in which $E_2^{cutoff-e} = Z \times E_2^{cutoff-H}$ for all elements except Fe.
This analysis illustrates two possibilities to this model and at some extent to any rigidity dependent model conceived to describe the energy spectrum of cosmic rays with energy between \energy{15} and \energyEV{18}. The energy spectrum of iron nuclei measured by KASCADE and KASCADE-Grande seems to require an extra flux of heavy particles for energies between \energy{17} and \energyEV{18}. This extra flux can be provided if the rigidity dependency of the knees is not maintained or if an extra flux of iron from a yet unknown source is produced.
The prediction of the model as fitted to the energy spectra of the elements shown in figure~\cref{fig:spectrum:h,fig:spectrum:intermediate,fig:spectrum:iron} was summed in order to obtain the total flux of particles. Figure~\ref{fig:spectrum:total} shows the energy spectrum of all particles as measured by KASCADE~\cite{bib:kascade:pr:knee:1}, KASCADE-Grande~\cite{bib:kascade:grande:ankle} and The Pierre Auger Observatory~\cite{bib:auger:spectrum}. The spectra of each element as measured by CREAM (H, He and Fe) and AMS-02 (H and He) are also shown. Two possibilities for the total flux predicted by the model are shown. The full black line takes into account the iron flux that fits the KASCADE-Grande data better, which does not obey the rigidity dependency of the knee. The dashed black line takes into account the iron flux that fits the KASCADE-Grande data worse which retained the rigidity dependency of the knee.
\section{Comparison of the model to the depth of shower maximum}
\label{sec:mass}
For energies above \energyEV{18}, the most reliable composition parameter is the depth of the shower maximum (\xmax). The results published by the Pierre Auger Collaboration~\cite{bib:auger:xmax} concerning the evolution of the \xmax with energy is independent of shower simulation and detector efficiencies, therefore this datum is used for comparison to the model predictions. The KASCADE and KASCADE-Grande data can also be transformed to an equivalent \meanXmax. Using the parametrization of \meanXmax as a function of energy and mass published in reference~\cite{ToderoPeixoto201318} and the flux of element groups measured by the experiments~\cite{bib:kascade:pr:knee:1,bib:kascade:pr:knee:2,bib:kascade:grande:prl} it is possible to calculate the equivalent \meanXmax of the measured abundance. Figure~\ref{fig:xmax} shows the comparison of the model as optimized in the previous section to the transformed KASCADE data, transformed KASCADE-Grande data, and Auger data. The energy spectra predicted by the model was transformed into \meanXmax measurements using the same procedure adopted for the KASCADE and KASCADE-Grande data, using the parametrization of \meanXmax as a function of energy and mass published in reference~\cite{ToderoPeixoto201318} for the Sibyll hadronic interaction model~\cite{bib:sibyll}.
Both versions of the model with and without an extra iron component describe the data qualitatively well. The Fe excess artificially introduced around \energyEV{17} produces a decrease of the \meanXmax and makes the transition between the transformed KASCADE-Grande data and Auger data more abrupt.
\section{Final Remarks}
\label{sec:conclusion}
The data analyzed here confirm the validity of the model in which only the Galaxy and CenA could produce all cosmic rays measure on Earth with energy above \energyEV{10}. For the first time, the data from AMS-02 and CREAM were used to fix the relative contribution of individual elements.
The analysis presented here tries to describe the iron nuclei flux reconstructed by the KASCADE-Grande experiment within the framework of the original model~\cite{Stanev_Biermann_Gaisser_1993}. The calculations shown in the previous section suggest an extra flux of iron nuclei which does not obey the rigidity dependence hypothesis. The KASCADE-Grande Collaboration reported a suppression in the flux of heavy elements at $8\times 10^{16}$ eV~\cite{bib:kascade:grande:prl}. However, according to this publication the suppression is less significant in the all particle spectrum~\cite{bib:kascade:grande:prl}. At the same time, it is clear that the steepening of the spectrum after the knee is more severe for the light component rather than for the heavy component. The calculation done here suggests that this energy range $10^{16.5} < E < 10^{17.5}$ eV might contain an extra flux of a heavy element. This idea has been advocated by Hillas~\cite{bib:hillas}. However, in his proposal, Galactic magnetars are considered as possible sources for the extra iron flux. Another similar study was presented in reference~\cite{1475-7516-2014-10-020} in which the need of an additional extragalactic component is pointed out.
Depending on how many supernova explosions contribute cosmic ray particles near the knee region and beyond, the possibility cannot be excluded with certainty, that just relatively few explosions contribute, and then one is the strongest. If this strongest one derives from a more powerful supernova, such as in the hyper-nova model discussed in reference~\cite{bib:paczynski,bib:wang} then the cosmic ray spectrum near and beyond the knee region could be modified. This could entail, that the corresponding knee energy, the spectral index below the knee, the polar cap component, and the component beyond the knee could all be changed, especially by being shifted to higher energies, and that the deeper layers of the stars might be exposed, allowing Fe to become much stronger for this one star.
The reconstructed particle fluxes published by KASCADE and KASCADE-Grande were converted to an equivalent \meanXmax as shown together with the measured \meanXmax published by the Pierre Auger Collaboration. Despite the large error bars of the converted KASCADE-Grande data for energies above \energy{17.5},the apparent continuity of the KASCADE-Grande to Auger data is remarkable. The hypothesis with and without an extra iron nuclei flux for the model proposed here are compared to the data. The data cannot to discriminate between the two hypothesis. Here we see a possible trade-off, a special Fe-component, well supported by data, and a normal Fe-component (i.e. as in the rigidity dependent model), and a much enhanced high energy H-component. New composition data from the LOFAR, TA and Auger experiments is expected to the published in the near future for the energy range \energy{17} to \energyEV{18}. These new data might be able to discriminate between the two hypotheses.
\section{Acknowledgments}
CJTP thanks the support of CENAPAD computer center, FAPESP and CNPq fellowships. VdS thanks the support of the Brazilian population via CNPq and FAPESP (2012/22540-4). PLB acknowledges discussions with J. Becker, J. Bl{\"u}mer, L. Caramete, R. Engel, J. Everett, H. Falcke, T.K. Gaisser, L.A. Gergely, A. Haungs, S. Jiraskova, H. Kang, K.-H. Kampert, A. Kogut, Gopal Krishna, R. Lovelace, K. Mannheim, I. Maris, G. Medina-Tanco, A. Meli, B. Nath, A. Obermeier, J. Rachen, M. Romanova, D. Ryu, E.-S. Seo, T. Stanev, P. Wiita, W.R. Binns, T. Frederico, and J. Var. The authors acknowledge their KASCADE, KASCADE-Grande and Pierre Auger Collaborators and the AMS-02 and CREAM experiments. The authors thank the Pierre Auger Collaboration for permission to use their data prior to journal publication.
\bibliographystyle{unsrt}\small
|
\section{Introduction}
\subsection{Injective Envelopes} The study of injective metric spaces arose from the study of hyper-convexity in functional analysis (see Theorem~\ref{injectivity criterion}). Most notably, the characterization of hyper-convexity by Aronszajn and Panitchpakdi led to Isbell's study of this class of spaces from a categorical viewpoint.
\begin{definition}[Injective Metric Space \cite{Isbell-injective_envelope}]\label{defn:injective space} A metric space $X$ is said to be injective, if for any isometric embedding $i:A\to B$ and any non-expansive map $f:A\to X$ there exists a non-expansive $F:B\to X$ satisfying $F\circ i=f$.
\end{definition}
\begin{theorem}[Aronszajn-Panitchpakdi, \cite{hyperconvex_spaces}]\label{injectivity criterion} A metric space $(X,d)$ is injective if and only if it is hyper-convex: every finite collection of closed balls $\{B(p_i,r_i)\}_{i=1}^n$ in $X$ satisfying $r_i+r_j\geq d(p_i,p_j)$ for all $1\leq i,j\leq n$ has a common point.
\end{theorem}
Isbell introduces the category of metric spaces with non-expansive maps as morphisms, and considers the injective objects of this category with respect to the class of isometric embeddings.\footnote{Note that the requirement from $i:A\to B$ to be an isometric embedding rather than just a monic map in the category produces a notion of injectivity that is weaker than monic-injectivity.} Expanding on the results of Aroszajn and Panitchpakdi (who demonstrated, among other things, that an injective space is necessarily complete and geodesic), Isbell attempts two tasks that are natural in the categorical setting: the construction of injective envelopes and the classification of injective objects. For a modern account of Isbell's categorical construction and its variants, see \cite{Lang-injective_envelopes_and_groups}.
\medskip
For the first task, Isbell proves that every metric space $X$ admits an isometric embedding $e_X$ into an injective metric space $\epsilon X$ with the property that any embedding of $X$ in an injective metric space factors through $e_X$. Isbell's construction is very explicit---in fact, explicit enough to demonstrate that $\epsilon X$ has a polyhedral structure when $X$ is finite. This leads to a natural question, which is a part of the classification task.
\begin{question} Which polyhedra can be endowed with an injective metric?
\end{question}
Isbell shows that in order to support an injective metric, a (simplicial) polyhedron $X$ must satisfy some basic {\it topological} requirements. For example: $X$ needs to be collapsible.
\medskip
Isbell's construction of envelopes has been independently discovered and expanded upon by Dress \cite{Dress-tight_extensions}. This has since been applied with much success to expanding the theory (and practice) of the very practical problem of distance-based clustering \cite{Bandelt_Dress-cut_metrics,Bandelt_Dress-similarity_clustering,Dress_Huber_Moulton-clustering}. Other related work deals with calculating features of injective envelopes such as cut-points \cite{Dress-envelope_cut_points}, explicit embeddings in the $\ell^1$ plane \cite{Eppstein-ellone_plane} and Gromov--Hausdorff distance estimates \cite{Lang_Pavon_Zust-tight_spans}. A detailed analysis of envelopes for discrete infinite spaces has been carried out by Lang in \cite{Lang-injective_envelopes_and_groups} with applications to group theory in mind, where injective envelopes are proposed as an alternative to standard polyhedral model spaces (e.g. Rips complex) for some classes of finitely generated groups (e.g. Gromov-hyperbolic groups).
\medskip
Throughout this body of work we find hints to a connection of this theory with the notion of metric non-positive curvature in the sense of Alexandrov \cite{Bridson_Haefliger-nonpositive_curvature}:
\begin{itemize}
\item Much of the cited work relies to a varying extent on a combination theorem stating that gluing a pair of injective spaces along a point results in an injective space; a more developed combination theory seems to be missing, however.
\item Dress offers a characterization of the injective envelope $\epsilon X$ of $X$ as the geodesic extension of $X$ where for every pair $x',y'\in\epsilon X$ there exist points $x,y\in X$ satisfying
\begin{equation}
\dist{x}{x'}+\dist{x'}{y'}+\dist{y'}{y}=\dist{x}{y}
\end{equation}
In other words, $\epsilon X$ is a minimal geodesically complete extension of $X$ where $X$ shows up in the role of a `boundary.'
\item Finally, Isbell's construction of an injective metric on a collapsible 2-dimensional simplicial complex makes explicit use of combinatorial non-positive curvature conditions. Mai and Tang's extension of Isbell's result \cite{Mai_Tang-collapsible_is_injective} makes a similar use of non-positive curvature, though only in combinatorial form and without realizing the potential for constructing a whole deformation space of injective metrics on the given complex.
\end{itemize}
Let us now study Isbell's argument in more detail as we analyze the connection with non-positive curvature and introduce our own results.
\subsection{Results} In \cite{Isbell-injective_envelope}, Isbell proves that a collapsible 2-dimensional cellular complex $X$ admits an injective metric by explicitly constructing a hyper-convex metric on $X$ as follows: taking a triangulation of $X$, he subdivides its triangles into squares so as to form what he calls a {\it collapsible cubical 2-complex}, $\Delta$. He then metrizes $X$ as a geometric realization of $\Delta$, having first realized each 2-cube as a copy of the unit cube in $(\fat{R}^2,\Vert\cdot\Vert_\infty)$ and endowing the resulting 2-dimensional piecewise-$\ell^\infty$ polyhedron with the associated quotient metric. Isbell's verification of the injectivity criterion then proceeds in two steps:
\begin{enumerate}
\item Reduction to the case where all the $p_i$ are vertices of the cubical subdivision and all the $r_i$ are integers;
\item Applying the properties of a `collapsible cubical 2-complex' to verify the result.
\end{enumerate}
Among Isbell's requirements of a collapsible cubical 2-complexes one immediately notices Gromov's `no-triangle' condition for non-positively curved cubical complexes. Indeed, upon closer inspection it becomes clear that the notion of a collapsible cubical 2-complex is exactly a 2-dimensional cubing in the language of modern geometric group theory.
\begin{definition}[Gromov \cite{Gromov-survey_of_the_future}, Sageev \cite{Sageev-thesis}]\label{defn:cubing} A cubical complex $X$ is non-positively curved (NPC) if the link of each vertex in $X$ is a simplicial flag complex. The complex $X$ said to be a {\it cubing}, if it is non-positively curved and simply-connected.
\end{definition}
Fairly unrestrictive conditions are known for when the piecewise-Euclidean metric on a cubing is complete and geodesic. For example, this will happen when the cubing is locally finite-dimensional, as follows almost immediately from Bridson's theorem on shapes (\cite{Bridson_Haefliger-nonpositive_curvature}, theorem I.7.50). Under these conditions one applies the Cartan--Hadamard theorem to conclude that $X$ is CAT(0) and therefore contractible --- a necessary condition for injectivity (see, e.g. \cite{Dress-tight_extensions}).
\medskip
Bridson's theorem on shapes applies equally well (though with some care) to the setting when the cubes of a locally finite cubing are metrized as axis-parallel parallelopipeds in $(\fat{R}^n,\Vert\cdot\Vert_\infty)$, where $n$ may vary. The edge lengths of the parallelopipeds may be chosen with some degree of freedom, subject to the gluing constraints of the complex. We call the resulting geodesic spaces {\it piecewise-$\ell^\infty$ cubings}. Our central result is:
\begin{theorem}\label{main theorem} Every locally-finite piecewise-$\ell^\infty$ cubing is injective.
\end{theorem}
Thus, not only is it true that any locally finite combinatorial cubing is injectively metrizable (Mai and Tang \cite{Mai_Tang-collapsible_is_injective}), but, in fact, it carries a whole deformation space of injective metrics. Moreover, observing that the class of injective metric spaces is closed under pointed Gromov-Hausdorff limits (see lemma below) extends the scope of the above theorem to give the main result stated in the abstract.
\medskip
The same lemma plays a crucial role in our reduction of the general case to the case of finite unit cubings:
\begin{lemma}[``Limit Lemma'']\label{limit lemma} A complete metric space arising as a pointed Gromov--Hausdorff limit of proper injective metric spaces is itself injective.
\end{lemma}
Recall that a metric space is said to be proper if closed bounded subsets thereof are compact. Applied to our setting, this lemma implies the sufficiency of proving only the following theorem.
\begin{theorem}\label{main theorem, finite version} Every {\it finite} piecewise-$\ell^\infty$ cubing $X$ is injective.
\end{theorem}
We explain how to see any such space $X$ as a pointed Gromov--Hausdorff limit of a sequence of the form $\left(\tfrac{1}{n}X^{(n)},v\right)_{n\in\fat{N}}$ where $X^{(n)}$ is a cubical subdivision of $X$ obtained by cutting the cubes of $X$ in a grid-like fashion (parallel to their faces), with unit weights. Applying the limit lemma once again we see that it now suffices to prove one final lemma.
\begin{proposition}\label{final lemma} Every finite unit piecewise-$\ell^\infty$ cubing is injective.
\end{proposition}
This is, essentially, the original result proved by Mai and Tang in \cite{Mai_Tang-collapsible_is_injective}. In this paper, we propose an alternative proof using the full power of the structure theory of cubings. Roughly speaking, the idea is to prove that the balls in the zero-skeleton $X^0$ of a unit piecewise-$\ell^\infty$ cubing $X$ are convex subsets of $X^0$ with respect to its unit piecewise-$\ell^1$ metric. Once this is known, the same property is inherited by all piecewise-$\ell^\infty$ cubings via the limit lemma. This finishes the proof of injectivity. As cubings are known to be geodesic median spaces (see below) with respect to their piecewise-$\ell^1$ metric, they satisfy a $1$-dimensional Helly theorem: every finite collection of pairwise-intersecting convex sets has a common point. In particular, any collection of pairwise-intersecting $\ell^\infty$-balls in a cubing must have a common point, and injectivity is proved.
\subsection{Remaining Questions} The class of piecewise-$\ell^\infty$ cubings does not coincide with the class of injective metric spaces. This follows directly from the limit lemma and the example below (see ex. \ref{example:three-fin} and fig. \ref{fig:three-fin}). It would be interesting to quantify the discrepancy, perhaps in terms of the classification by Lang \cite{Lang-injective_envelopes_and_groups}.
\begin{figure}[t]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=.6\columnwidth]{three_fin}
\end{center}
\caption{The injective envelope of the 5-point space in Example~\ref{example:three-fin} (a) may be obtained as a limit of $\ell^\infty$-cubings of the form (b).
\label{fig:three-fin}}
\end{figure}
\begin{example}[Injective Envelope of 5 Points]\label{example:three-fin} It is shown in \cite{Bandelt_Dress-cut_metrics} that the metric space $X=\{1,2,3,4,5\}$ with
\begin{eqnarray*}
&&\dist{1}{2}=\dist{1}{3}=\dist{1}{4}=1,\\
&&\dist{5}{2}=\dist{5}{3}=\dist{5}{4}=1,\\
&&\dist{1}{5}=\dist{2}{3}=\dist{2}{4}=\dist{3}{4}=2,
\end{eqnarray*}
has the injective envelope depicted in Figure~\ref{fig:three-fin}(a), where one should think of the triple fin depicted there as the result of gluing three unit squares cut out the $\ell^1$ plane and glued together to overlap along the (filled-in) triangles with sides $[1,5]$, $[1,x]$ and $[x,5]$ for $x\in\{2,3,4\}$. Each of these triangular fins is, in fact the limit of a sequence of piecewise-$\ell^\infty$ cubings, resulting in a sequence of approximations for $\epsilon X$ of the form shown in Figure~\ref{fig:three-fin}(b).
\end{example}
While it is very possible that the class of limits of piecewise-$\ell^\infty$ cubings is still too narrow to exhaust all injective metric spaces, our results seem to suggest that the combinatorial structure of a cubing is nothing more than a set of explicit gluing instructions following which one could create a `big' injective space out of small, standardized pieces, namely: $\ell^\infty$-cubes. Thus, our results are nothing more than a glimpse of a combination theory for constructing `big' injective spaces out of `small'/`simple' ones. This motivates the following question.
\begin{question} Is there a combination theory for injective metric spaces? If two injective spaces are glued along a convex (injective?) subspace, when is the resulting space injective?
\end{question}
A well-developed combination theory should simplify the proofs of the existing results as well as contribute to the understanding of the problem of characterizing injective spaces in constructive terms.
\section{Preliminaries}\label{section:preliminaries}
We use this section to recall some of the language required for the rigorous development of the main result. Some of the facts presented in this section seem to be common knowledge, yet new in the sense that they are not easily found in the literature --- we thought it better to include them here due to their elementary nature, as well as for the sake of giving a self-contained exposition.
\subsection{Piecewise-(your favorite geometry here) Complexes}\label{section:geometric complexes} The purpose of this section is to recall the necessary technical language for dealing with geometric complexes. We do not intend to treat the subject at any level of generality beyond what is required for dealing with cubings---see Chapter I.5 of \cite{Bridson_Haefliger-nonpositive_curvature} for a careful and detailed exposition of this topic.
\begin{definition}[Quotient Metric] Let $(X,d)$ be a metric space, where $d$ is allowed infinite values. Suppose $P$ is a partition of $X$. Then the quotient (semi-)distance $\bar d(\xi,\eta)$ for $\xi,\eta\in P$ is defined as the greatest lower bound on expressions of the form
\begin{equation}
\sum_{i=0}^n d(x_i,y_i)
\end{equation}
where $x_0\in\xi$, $y_n\in\eta$ and $y_{i-1}\sim_{_P} x_i$ for all $i=1,\ldots,n$.
\end{definition}
In the case of a cubical complex, one considers the complex $X$ as a quotient of a disjoint union $\tilde X$ of a collection of cubes---copies of $[0,1]^n\subset\fat{R}^n$ for possibly varying values of $n\in\fat{N}$---with isometric identifications along some of the faces generating the equivalence relation defining the partition $P$. While the distance in $\tilde X$ between points of distinct cubes is set to be infinite, each cube is endowed with the metric it inherits from $\fat{R}^n$.
In this paper we consider the three cases where {\it all cubes at the same time} inherit their geometry from one of the $\ell^2$, the $\ell^1$ or the $\ell^\infty$ norms. The resulting metric space $(X,d)$ is then referred to as a {\it unit piecewise-$\ell^2$, $\ell^1$ or $\ell^\infty$ cubical complex}.
A slight variation on this construction is achieved by putting weights on the coordinate axes of the individual cubes. One needs to make sure that the weights match, in the sense that any two cubes sharing a common face in $X$ do have their axes weighted in a way that keeps the identified faces isometric. As we shall see in Section~\ref{section:weighted cubings}, Roller's duality theory between cubings and discrete poc sets is ideally suited for the purpose of maintaining the necessary records.
It is not hard to verify (though it does require some work which, thankfully, had been done in \cite{Bridson_Haefliger-nonpositive_curvature}) that the quotient metric on a piecewise-$\ell^p$ ($p=1,2,\infty$) cubical complex takes the following form:
\begin{definition}[broken path, length] A {\it broken path} in a cubing $X$ is a sequence of points $\mbf{p}=(x_0,\ldots,x_n)$ where $x_0=x$, $x_n=y$ and every consecutive pair of points is contained in a face of $X$. The {\it length} of $\mbf{p}$ is defined to be:
\begin{equation}
\length{\mbf{p}}:=\sum_{i=1}^n\dist{x_{i-1}}{x_i}
\end{equation}
where $\dist{x_{i-1}}{x_i}$ is measured in a face containing the points $x_{i-1},x_i$.
\end{definition}
With this language, of course, the piecewise-$\ell^p$ distance between two points of a cubical complex becomes the greatest lower bound on the length of a broken path between them. There are some obvious optimizations to this picture.
\begin{definition}
The broken path $\mbf{p}$ is said to be {\it taut} if no consecutive triple of points along $\mbf{p}$ is contained in a cube.
\end{definition}
Since the individual cubes in $\tilde X$ are geodesic metric spaces, tightening a broken path locally will never increase its length. This leads to the formula:
\begin{equation}\label{ell-p formula}
\dist{x}{y}=\inf\set{\length{\mbf{p}}}{\mbf{p}\in\paths{x,y}\text{ is taut}}.
\end{equation}
We postpone the rest of this discussion till a time when we have a better way of representing piecewise-$\ell^p$ cubings, in section \ref{section:weighted cubings}
\subsection{Gromov--Hausdorff limits}\label{section:GH limits}
We refer the reader to Chapter I.5 of \cite{Bridson_Haefliger-nonpositive_curvature} for a detailed introduction and discussion of Gromov--Hausdorff convergence of proper metric spaces. Recall that a binary relation $R\subset X\times Y$ has {\it projections}
\begin{equation}
\begin{split}
\pi_X(R)=\set{x\in X}{\exists y\in Y\;(x,y)\in R}\\
\pi_Y(R)=\set{y\in Y}{\exists x\in X\;(x,y)\in R}
\end{split}
\end{equation}
and that a subset $Z$ of a metric space $X$ is said to be {\it $\epsilon$-dense} (in $X$), if the collection of closed balls of radius $\epsilon$ about the points of $Z$ cover $X$. We will use the following convergence criterion for our technical work.
\begin{definition} Let $X,Y$ be metric spaces and let $\epsilon>0$. A relation $R\subseteq X\times Y$ is said to be an {\it $\epsilon$-approximation} between $X$ and $Y$, if:
\begin{enumerate}
\item the projections $\pi_X(R)$ and $\pi_Y(R)$ are $\epsilon$-dense;
\item $\left|\dist{x}{x'}-\dist{y}{y'}\right|<\epsilon$ holds for all $(x,y), (x',y') \in R$.
\end{enumerate}
An $\epsilon$-approximation is {\it surjective}, if $\pi_X(R)=X$ and $\pi_Y(R)=Y$.
\end{definition}
One of the ways to define the The Gromov--Hausdorff distance $GH(X,Y)$ is as (half, sometimes) the greatest lower bound of the set of $\epsilon>0$ admitting a surjective $\epsilon$-approximation between $X$ and $Y$. It is worth noting that estimation of Gromov--Hausdorff distances in the context of injective spaces and the use of $\epsilon$-approximations are not new to this field, for example: in \cite{Lang_Pavon_Zust-tight_spans} Lang, Pav\'on and Z\"ust estimate the change in Gromov--Hausdorff distance between spaces as one passes from the spaces to their injective envelopes. Thus, we expect that neither our limit lemma nor its proof below come as a surprise to the experts. We include the proof for convenience.
\medskip
Using $\epsilon$-approximations, Gromov--Hausdorff convergence is characterized as follows.
\begin{lemma}\label{lemma:GH convergence} Let $X_n$, $n\in\fat{N}$ and $X$ be metric spaces. The sequence $(X_n)_{n=1}^\infty$ converges to $X$ in the Gromov--Hausdorff topology, if for every $\epsilon>0$ there exist $N\in\fat{N}$ such that $\epsilon$-approximations $R_n(\epsilon)\subset X_n\times X$ exist for all $n\geq N$.\hfill $\square$
\end{lemma}
This kind of convergence is most meaningful in the category of compact metric spaces. Pointed Gromov--Hausdorff convergence (of proper metric spaces) extends this idea and is defined as follows:
\begin{definition}[\cite{Bridson_Swarup-GH_convergence}, Definition 1.8] A sequence $(X_n,b_n)_{n\in\fat{N}}$ of pointed proper metric spaces is said to converge to the pointed space $(X,b)$ if for every $R>0$ the sequence of closed metric balls $B_{X_n}(b_n,R)$, $n\in\fat{N}$, converges to the closed ball $B_X(x,R)$ in the Gromov--Hausdorff topology.
\end{definition}
Note that the completion of a pointed Gromov--Hausdorff limit of a sequence of spaces is itself a limit of the same sequence.
\medskip
We are ready to prove the limit lemma from the introduction.
\begin{lemma}\label{proof of limit lemma} Let $(X_n,b_n)$ be a sequence of pointed proper injective metric spaces converging to the space $(X,b)$ in the sense of pointed Gromov--Hausdorff convergence. Then the metric completion of $X$ is injective.
\end{lemma}
\begin{proof} We may assume $X$ is complete. We first make an independent observation: let $X,Y$ be metric spaces with $X$ injective and suppose that $R\subset X\times Y$ is an $\epsilon$-approximation. Given a collection $\{y_i\}_{i=1}^k$ of points in $Y$ and positive numbers $\{r_i\}_{i=1}^k$ satisfying
\begin{equation}\label{eqn:hypermetric}
r_i+r_j\geq\dist{y_i}{y_j}
\end{equation}
for all $i,j\in\{1,\ldots,k\}$. We find points $x_i\in X$, $i=1,\ldots,k$, such that $(x_i,y_i)\in R$ and we set $R_i=r_i+\epsilon$. It then follows that
\begin{equation}
R_i+R_j\geq\dist{x_i}{x_j}
\end{equation}
for all $i,j$. Applying theorem \ref{injectivity criterion} we find a point $x\in X$ with $\dist{x}{x_i}\leq R_i$ for all $i$, and conclude the existence of a point $y\in Y$ which then must satisfy $\dist{y}{y_i}\leq r_i+2\epsilon$ for all $i$.
\medskip
Now we apply the preceding observation to a fixed sequence of pointed injective spaces $(X_n,b_n)$ converging to a space $(X,b)$. Given finite collections $\{x_i\}_{i=1}^k$ of points in $X$ and $\{r_i\}_{i=1}^k$ of positive reals satisfying \eqref{eqn:hypermetric}, find $R>0$ large enough so that $B_X(b,R)$ contains the union of all the balls $B_X(x_i,r_i+2)$, $i=1,\ldots,k$. By the preceding argument, for every $\epsilon\in(0,1)$, the closed ball $B_X(b,R)$ contains a point $x_\epsilon$ satisfying $\dist{x_\epsilon}{x_i}\leq r_i+2\epsilon$ for $i=1,\ldots,k$. The existence of a point $x\in\bigcap B_X(x_i,r_i)$ now follows from the compactness of $B_X(b,R)$.
\end{proof}
\begin{remark}\label{reduction to integer radii} Observe that a different choice of the $R_i$---any choice, in fact, of $r_i+\epsilon\leq R_i\leq r_i+K\epsilon$ for a value of $K$ that is fixed in advance---would do. This enables a weakening of the assumptions (on the $X_n$) under which the preceding argument remains intact. Instead of assuming injectivity of each $X_n$ one may assume that the Aronszajn-Panitchpakdi condition holds for:
\begin{itemize}
\item[-] Finite subsets of a fixed $\epsilon$-dense subset $A_n$ of $X_n$,
\item[-] Radii restricted to, say, values in the set $\tfrac{1}{n}\fat{N}$.
\end{itemize}
The injectivity of $X$ would follow from these assumptions by the same argument as before.
\end{remark}
\subsection{Median Spaces}\label{section:median spaces} The hyper-convexity criterion of Aronszajn and Panitchpakdi cannot help but remind one of a similar phenomenon in the realm of median spaces. In this short review we follow the exposition of \cite{Chatterji_Drutu_Haglund-measured_spaces_with_walls}. Let $(X,d)$ be a semi-metric space.
\begin{definition}[Intervals and Medians] For $x,y\in X$, the {\it interval} $I(x,y)$ is defined to be
\begin{displaymath}
I(x,y)=\set{z\in X}{d(x,z)+d(z,y)=d(x,y)}.
\end{displaymath}
For $x,y,z\in X$, we say that a point $m\in X$ is a {\it median} of the triple $(x,y,z)$ if
\begin{displaymath}
m\in M(x,y,z):=I(x,y)\cap I(x,z)\cap I(y,z).
\end{displaymath}
\end{definition}
By definition, $M(x,y,z)$ is independent of the ordering of $x,y,z$. We also recall the following definitions.
\begin{definition}[Convexity and Half-spaces] A subset $K$ in a semi-metric space $(X,d)$ is {\it convex}, if $I(x,y)\subseteq K$ holds for every $x,y\in K$. $K$ is said to be a {\it half-space of $X$} if both $K$ and $X\smallsetminus K$ are convex subspaces of $X$.
\end{definition}
The notion of median points is significant for a large class of spaces.
\begin{definition}[Median Space] A semi-metric space is a {\it median space}, if $M(x,y,z)\neq\varnothing$ and $\diam{M(x,y,z)}=0$ for all $x,y,z\in X$. A map $f:X\to Y$ between median spaces is said to be a {\it median morphism} if $f(M(x,y,z))\subseteq M(f(x),f(y),f(z))$ for all $x,y,z\in X$.
\end{definition}
Recall that any semi-metric can be {\it Hausdorffified}: a semi-metric space $X$ gives rise to a metric space $\hau{X}$ by forming the quotient of $X$ by the equivalence relation $x\sim y\;\Leftrightarrow\; d(x,y)=0$. It is clear then that the median structure on $X$ descends to the quotient.
\begin{lemma} Suppose $(X,d)$ is a median semi-metric space. Then $\hau{X}$ is a median metric space where $M(x,y,z)$ is a singleton for all $x,y,z\in X$. When this happens, we write
\begin{displaymath}
M(x,y,z)=\left\{\mathrm{med}_X(x,y,z)\right\}
\end{displaymath}
and say that $\mathrm{med}_X(x,y,z)$ is the {\it median point} of the triple $(x,y,z)$.
\end{lemma}
We provide a few simple examples of median spaces to illustrate this structure.
\begin{example}[The real line is median] It is easy to verify that $\fat{R}$ is a complete geodesic median space, with
\begin{equation}\label{real median}
\mathrm{med}_\fat{R}(x,y,z)=y\text{ whenever }x\leq y\leq z
\end{equation}
\end{example}
\begin{example}[$\ell_1$-type normed spaces are geodesic median spaces] Suppose $(T,\mu)$ is a measure space. Then $X=L^1(T,\mu)$ is a median space and
\begin{equation}
\mathrm{med}(x,y,z)=\left(\mathrm{med}_\fat{R}(x(t),y(t),z(t))\right)_{t\in T}
\end{equation}
In the case when $T$ is finite, we see that $X$ is simply isometric to $\ell^1(T):=(\fat{R}^T,\Vert\cdot\Vert_1)$, with medians computed coordinatewise.
\end{example}
\medskip
Two things make median spaces highly relevant to this paper: the first is the fact that every cubing can be metrized to become a median space (and in more than one way as we shall see in section \ref{section:weighted cubings}); the second is the following theorem we have already mentioned in the introduction.
\begin{theorem}[Helly Theorem, \cite{Roller-duality} Theorem $2.2$]\label{Helly theorem} Suppose $\hsm{C}=\{C_i\}_{i=1}^n$ is a family of convex subsets of a median space $X$. If any two elements of $\hsm{C}$ have a point in common, then all elements of $\hsm{C}$ have a point in common.
\end{theorem}
Half-spaces play a crucial role in the theory of median spaces. With some modifications to known proofs for the more general setting of median algebras (see section 4 of \cite{Chatterji_Drutu_Haglund-measured_spaces_with_walls}), one can prove the following.
\begin{proposition}\label{halfspace presentation of convex sets} Let $X$ be a complete median space. Then every convex subset of $X$ is an intersection of {\it open} half-spaces. Any closed convex subset of $X$ is an intersection of {\it closed} half-spaces.
\end{proposition}
As explained in the introduction, our strategy for verifying the injectivity of a piecewise-$\ell^\infty$ cubing $X$ is to show that closed balls in such a cubing are {\it convex with respect to the piecewise-$\ell^1$ metric on the same cubing}. By Helly's theorem it will suffice to demonstrate that any closed $\ell^\infty$-ball is the intersection of closed half-spaces of $X$ when $X$ is viewed as a median space (using its piecewise-$\ell^1$ metric). The convexity of $\ell^\infty$-balls will result from us presenting any such ball as the intersection of a suitably chosen family of (closed) $\ell^1$-halfspaces.
\bigskip
The halfspace structure of a median space is fundamental to our technique. In fact, we will make good use of an isometric median embedding $\rho_{_X}$ of a median space $X$ into an $L^1$ space, constructed as follows (Theorem 5.1 and corollary 5.3 in \cite{Chatterji_Drutu_Haglund-measured_spaces_with_walls}):
\begin{itemize}
\item{\bf Construction of a `Transverse Measure', $\mu$: } one starts by constructing the set $\hsm{W}(X)$ of all pairs of the form $\{h,X\smallsetminus h\}$ where $h$ ranges over the halfspaces of $X$; it then turns out that a natural $\sigma$-algebra $\hsm{B}(X)$ exists on $\hsm{W}(X)$, together with a measure $\mu$, such that $\mu\hsm{W}(x|y)=\dist{x}{y}$ for all $x,y\in X$, where $\hsm{W}(x|y)$ denotes the subset of all pairs $\{h,X\smallsetminus h\}\in\hsm{W}(X)$ satisfying $x\in h$ and $y\in X\smallsetminus h$.
\item{\bf Embedding in $L^1(\mu)$: } fixing a base-point $b\in X$, map a point $x\in X$ to the function $\charf{\hsm{W}(x|b)}$. This map is a median-preserving isometric embedding.
\end{itemize}
\medskip
The case of locally-finite (or, equivalently, proper) cubings is well known (\cite{Sageev-thesis,Roller-duality,Chepoi-median_graphs,Niblo_Roller-property_T}) to fall under the purview of this construction while lending itself to analysis by simple combinatorial (rather than measure-theoretic) tools. We seek to capitalize on this fact in Section~\ref{section:geometry of cubings}, where we use this embedding to study the geometry of cubings endowed with a piecewise-$\ell^\infty$ geometry.
\medskip
Finally, some quick observations regarding the ambiguous relationship between median spaces and injective spaces are in order. Analyzing Isbell's construction of injective envelopes it is easy to verify that, if $X$ is an injective space and $Y$ is a subspace of $X$ then the inclusion of $Y$ into $X$ extends to an embedding of the envelope $\epsilon Y$ in $X$. The same construction enables one to prove that the injective envelope of three points is either an interval (degenerate or non-degenerate) or a tripod---a space isometric to a metric tree with four vertices and three leaves standing in bijective correspondence with the initial triple of points. Thus, for any triple of points $x,y,z$ in an injective space $X$, the median set $M(x,y,z)$ is non-empty!
\medskip
While medians do exist in injective spaces, there is no guarantee of uniqueness of the median, as one can easily observe in the normed space $\ell^\infty(S)$ for any set $S$ of cardinality greater than $2$. In fact, even cases so simple as the case of four points demonstrate the complicated relationship between the two classes---consider the following example.
\begin{figure}[t]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=.85\columnwidth]{bad_cubing}
\end{center}
\caption{The spaces $X_t$ (left) and $X_0$ (right) from Example~\ref{example:non-injective 1}. A median-preserving map from $X_0$ to $X_t$ is impossible.\label{fig:non-injective median space}}
\end{figure}
\begin{example}[Non-Injective Median Spaces]\label{example:non-injective 1} Let $t\in[0,1]$ be a real parameter, and let $Q_t$ denote the three-dimensional cube $[0,t]^3\subset\fat{R}^3$, endowed with the $\ell^1$ metric. Denote:
\begin{displaymath}
a=(0,0,0)\,,\;\;
b=(t,t,0)\,,\;\;
c=(t,0,t)\,,\;\;
d=(0,t,t)
\end{displaymath}
and let $J_x$, $x\in\{a,b,c,d\}$ denote pairwise disjoint copies of the the interval $[0,1-t]\subset\fat{R}$ endowed with the standard metric. We form a space $X_t$ as the quotient of $Q_t\cup\{J_a,J_b,J_c,J_d\}$ by identifying the point $0\in J_\sigma$ with the point $\sigma\in Q_t$ for every $\sigma\in\{a,b,c,d\}$, and endow $X_t$ with the quotient metric. Finally, we denote the point in $X_t$ corresponding to $1-t\in J_\sigma$ with the capital letter variant of $\sigma\in\{a,b,c,d\}$; see Figure~\ref{fig:non-injective median space}.
Deferring the proof that the $X_t$ are median spaces until Section~\ref{section:weighted cubings}, Example~\ref{example:non-injective 2}, let us focus on explaining why $X_t$ is not injective for any $t>0$. Observe that the subspace $Y=\{A,B,C,D\}\subset X_t$ satisfies $\dist{x}{y}=2$ for all $x,y\in Y$. It follows that $X_0$ is the injective envelope of $Y$ with this metric. If $X_t$ were injective for some $t>0$, the inclusion map $inc:Y\to X_t$ would have extended to an isometric embedding $j:X_0\to X_t$. Since both $X_0$ and $X_t$ are median spaces, $j$ is then a median-preserving map. Denoting the median map of $X_t$ by $\mathrm{med}_t$, we observe in $X_t$ that
\begin{eqnarray*}
j\left(\mathrm{med}_0(A,B,C)\right)&=&\mathrm{med}_t(A,B,C)=c\,,\\
j\left(\mathrm{med}_0(A,B,D)\right)&=&\mathrm{med}_t(A,B,D)=d,
\end{eqnarray*}
while at the same time in $X_0$ one has
\begin{displaymath}
\mathrm{med}_0(A,B,C)=c=d=\mathrm{med}_0(A,B,D)\text{ in }X_0.
\end{displaymath}
Since $c\neq d$ in $X_t$ for $t>0$, we have arrived at a contradiction and we conclude $X_t$ cannot be injective for $t>0$.\hfill $\square$
\end{example}
The last example hints that failure of injectivity is fairly common among median spaces. We find it intriguing, then, that a mere change of the geometry of the vector space on which the individual cubes are modeled should result in a change so radical as turning all the spaces in question into injective spaces. This kind of behaviour seems to hint at the existence of a general principle loosely formulated as {\it a non-positively curved combination of injective spaces is injective}. The extent to which such a statement is true remains to be verified.
\section{Piecewise-$\ell^1$ Cubings and their Geometry}\label{section:geometry of cubings}
For a very serious and inspiring recent account of the theory of non-positively curved cubical complexes please see \cite{Wise-riches_to_raags}. Piecewise-$\ell^2$ cubings and their applications to group theory are discussed in great detail in \cite{Bridson_Haefliger-nonpositive_curvature}.
\medskip
Beyond these references, we will not delve into any detail regarding cubical complexes from the topological viewpoint. Instead we will focus on a very direct construction of cubings, due initially to Sageev \cite{Sageev-thesis}, and developed by Roller in \cite{Roller-duality} based on Isbell's duality \cite{Isbell-duality} between poc sets and median algebras. Let us just clarify what we mean by a cube, to avoid any confusion.
\begin{definition}\label{defn:standard cube} Let $S$ be a set. The {\it standard $S$-cube} is the set $\cub{S}$ of all functions from $S$ into $[0,1]$. When $S=\varnothing$, the {\it 0-dimensional cube} $\cub{S}$ is defined to equal the one-point set $\{\ast\}$. More generally, we say that $\cub{S}$ is a $\card{S}$-dimensional cube.
\end{definition}
Much of the material present in this section has been known to geometric groups theorists for quite some time, either formally or as folklore. Unfortunately, the literature on the technical tools we are using is in a state of slight disarray preventing immediate application to the specific problem at hand. We therefore decided to gather the necessary material here, filling in some of the gaps and formalizing the folklore.
\subsection{Poc Sets} We recall some definitions and examples.
\begin{definition}[Poc Set, \cite{Roller-duality}] A {\it poc set} is a poset $(P,\leq)$ with a minimum element denoted $0\in P$ and endowed with an order-reversing involution $a\mapsto a^\ast$ satisfying the additional requirement
\begin{displaymath}
(\dagger)\quad
a\leq a^\ast\;\Rightarrow\; a=0.
\end{displaymath}
We say that $P$ is discrete, if the poset $(P,\leq)$ is discrete, that is: order intervals
\begin{equation}
[a,b]=\set{x\in }{a\leq x\leq b}
\end{equation}
are finite for all $a,b\in P$.
\end{definition}
Working with poc sets requires some additional jargon.
\begin{definition} Let $P$ be a poc set.
\begin{itemize}
\item[-] Elements of $P$ are often referred to as {\it halfspaces};
\item[-] The elements $0,0^\ast\in P$ are said to be {\it trivial};
\item[-] The non-trivial halfspaces are said to be {\it proper};
\item[-] A complementary pair $\{a,a^\ast\}$ of proper halfspaces is called a {\it wall} of $P$;
\item[-] A pair $\{a,b\}$ with $a\notin\{b,b^\ast\}$ will be called a {\it proper pair}.
\end{itemize}
\end{definition}
The meaning of $(\dagger)$ is summarized in the observation that any proper pair $a,b\in P$ satisfies {\it at most one of the following relations}:
\begin{equation}\label{nesting relations}
a\leq b\,,\;
a^\ast\leq b\,,\;
a\leq b^\ast\,,\;
a^\ast\leq b^\ast.
\end{equation}
The above relations (if they hold) are called {\it nesting relations}.
\begin{definition} Let $P$ be a poc set. A pair of elements $a,b\in P$ satisfying one of the relations \eqref{nesting relations} is said to be {\it nested}. More generally, a set $A\subset P$ is said to be nested if its elements are nested pairwise. The set $A$ is said to be {\it transverse} if no two of its elements are nested. A transverse pair $a,b\in P$ is often denoted with $a\pitchfork b$.
\end{definition}
\begin{example}[Power Set] The power set $\power{S}$ of a non-empty set $S$ is a poc set with respect to inclusion and complementation. In particular, the power set of one point, denoted $\power{}$, is the {\it trivial} poc set.
\end{example}
\begin{example}[Linear Poc Set]\label{example:linear poc set} Let $(P,\leq)$ be a totally ordered set. Then the set $Q=P\sqcup P^\ast\sqcup\{\mbf{0},\mbf{0}^\ast\}$ -- where $P^\ast$ is the set of symbols of the form $p^\ast$ for $p\in P$ -- and subject to the relations $\mbf{0}\leq x$ and $x\leq\mbf{0}^\ast$ for all $x\in Q$, as well as the relations $p^\ast\leq q^\ast$ iff $q<p$ in $P$, is a poc set.
\end{example}
\begin{example}[Poc Set of a Tree]\label{example:poc set of a tree} Let $T$ be a tree with edge set $E$ and vertex set $V$. Let $P$ be the set of vertex-sets of connected components of all possible $T-e$, where $e$ ranges over $E$. Then $P$ is a discrete nested poc set with respect to inclusion and complementation.
\end{example}
Of course, one should also mention the morphisms in this category:
\begin{definition} A function $f:P\to Q$ between poc sets is a {\it poc morphism}, if it is order-preserving and $\ast$-equivariant, that is:
\begin{equation}
a\leq b\;\Rightarrow\; f(a)\leq f(b)\,,\quad f(a^\ast)=f(a)^\ast
\end{equation}
for all $a,b\in P$.
\end{definition}
\subsection{The Dual Cubing of a Poc Set}
The following construction is due to Sageev \cite{Sageev-thesis} in the specific context of relative ends of groups, and to Isbell \cite{Isbell-duality} and Roller \cite{Roller-duality} in the current level of generality.
\begin{definition}[Dual of a Poc Set] Let $P$ be a finite poc set. An {\it ultra-filter} $U$ on $P$ is a subset of $P$ satisfying:
\begin{enumerate}
\item\label{ast-selection} for all $a\in P$ one has $a\in U$ or $a^\ast\in U$, but not both;
\item\label{coherence} for all $a,b\in U$ one {\it never} has $a\leq b^\ast$.
\end{enumerate}
The set of all ultra-filters on $P$ is denoted by $P^\circ$ and may be naturally identified with $\mathrm{Hom}(P,\power{})$. A subset $U\subset P$ satisfying \eqref{ast-selection} is called a {\it complete $\ast$-selection on $P$}. A subset $U\subset P$ satisfying \eqref{coherence} is said to be {\it coherent}. We will denote the set of all $\ast$-selections by $S(P)^0$.
\end{definition}
Picking a basepoint $B\in S(P)^0$ makes it easy to identify $S(P)^0$ with the vertex set of the $B$-cube $\cub{B}$: simply observe that the map
\begin{equation}\label{eqn:representation map}
\rho:U\mapsto 1-\charf{B\smallsetminus U}
\end{equation}
viewed as a map of $S(P)^0$ into $\cub{B}$ is injective, with image precisely the set of $\{0,1\}$-valued elements of the (possibly infinite-dimensional) {\it standard unit cube}:
\begin{equation}
\cub{B}:=\left\{x:B\to[0,1]\right\}.
\end{equation}
Note that $B$ is mapped to the origin and that the $\ell^1$ metric on $\cub{B}$ induces the following combinatorial metric on $S(P)^0$.
\begin{definition}[Metric on $(\ast)$-selections]
\begin{equation}\label{ellone metric on a cubing}
\ellone{}(U,V)=\card{U\smallsetminus V}=\card{V\smallsetminus U}=\tfrac{1}{2}\card{U\vartriangle V}.
\end{equation}
\end{definition}
Due to symmetry, this metric is clearly independent of the choice of basepoint $B$. Thus, $\cub{B}$ effectively endows $S(P)^0$ with the structure of a graph $S(P)^1$ if we set two vertices $U,V\in S(P)^0$ to be joined by an edge iff $\ellone{}(U,V)=1$. With a little bit of additional work one observes that a sub-graph $L$ of $S(P)^1$ is isomorphic to the $1$-skeleton of a $d$-cube if and only if $L$ is mapped by $\rho$ onto the vertex set of some appropriate $d$-face of $\cub{B}$. Thus, $S(P)^1$ may be thought of as the $1$-skeleton of a cubical complex $S(P)$ which is isomorphic to $\cub{B}$ under the affine extension $\rho$. It is easy to verify that $\cub{B}$ is homogeneous, making the choice of basepoint $B$ immaterial (for now).
\begin{definition} Let $P$ be a discrete poc set. Then $\cube{}{P}$ is defined to be the sub-complex of $S(P)$ of all faces {\it not} incident to an incoherent vertex.
\end{definition}
A few simple examples are as follows.
\begin{example}[Dual of a Transverse Poc Set] When the poc set $P$ has no non-trivial nesting relations it is clear that $\cube{}{P}$ coincides with the cube $S(P)$.
\end{example}
\begin{example}[Dual of a Linear Poc Set]\label{dual of linear} It is not hard to see that $\cube{}{P}$ for a linear poc set $P$ (see Example~\ref{example:linear poc set}) is the extension of $P$ by Dedekind cuts.
\end{example}
\begin{example}[Dual of a nested Poc Set]\label{dual of nested} It is a more involved computation to verify that the dual of a finite nested Poc Set $P$ is a finite tree. Moreover, $P$ is naturally isomorphic to the poc set constructed from this tree as described in example \ref{example:poc set of a tree}. This is a particular case of \cite{Dicks_Dunwoody-groups_acting_on_graphs}, II.1.8-10.
\end{example}
Finally, we give an example we will use later on.
\begin{example}[Cartesian Products]\label{Cartesian products} Suppose $P$ and $Q$ are discrete poc sets, and let $P\vee Q$ denote the poc set obtained from $P\cup Q$ by identifying $\mbf{0}_P$ with $\mbf{0}_Q$ (and hence also $\mbf{0}^\ast_P$ with $\mbf{0}^\ast_Q$). Then any proper element of $P$ is transverse to any proper element of $Q$ and it is easily shown that $\cube{}{P\vee Q}$ is naturally isomorphic to $\cube{}{P}\times\cube{}{Q}$.
\end{example}
Summarizing all the above is the surprising result anticipated by Sageev and proved by Roller and Chepoi.
\begin{theorem}[Sageev--Roller, Chepoi]\label{Sageev-Roller duality} Let $P$ be a discrete poc set. Then every connected component of $\cube{}{P}$ is a cubing and $\ellone{}$ coincides with the combinatorial path metric on its $1$-dimensional skeleton. Conversely, every cubing $X$ is a connected component of $\cube{}{P}$ for an appropriately chosen discrete poc set $P$.
\end{theorem}
When $P$ is infinite, $\cube{}{P}$ inevitably forms a disconnected space. The connected components of $\cube{}{P}$ are spanned by the almost-equality classes of its vertices: recall that two subsets $U,W$ of a set $S$ are said to be {\it almost equal} if the symmetric difference $U\vartriangle W$ is finite; by the definition of the metric $\ellone{}$ on $\cube{}{P}$, a pair of vertices in $\cube{}{P}$ is joined by an edge-path if and only if they are almost-equal to each other as subsets of $P$. For example, if $P$ is nested, $\cube{}{P}$ will consist of a tree whose poc set of halfspaces is naturally isomorphic to $P$, together with its space of ends, each end being the only point of its component in $\cube{}{P}$ (\cite{Dicks_Dunwoody-groups_acting_on_graphs}).
\medskip
In general, however, it may not be possible to {\it naturally} select a (distinguished) component $K$ of $\cube{}{P}$ whose poc set of half-spaces is isomorphic to $P$. Work done in \cite{Roller-duality} and in \cite{Guralnik-Roller_boundary} explains how to achieve this under the condition that $P$ contains no infinite transverse set.
\medskip
Seeking to avoid such technicalities we will use the trick of restricting attention to a component containing a particular vertex of interest.
\begin{definition}\label{picking a component} Let $P$ be a discrete poc set and $B\in P^\circ$. The connected component of the complex $\cube{}{P}$ containing the vertex $B$ will be denoted $\cube{}{P}_B$.
\end{definition}
Recall the (piecewise affinely extended) representation map $\rho \colon \cube{}{P}\to\fat{R}^B$ defined in Equation~\ref{eqn:representation map}, and note that $\cube{}{P}_B$ is precisely the intersection of the image of $\rho$ with the vector subspace $\ell^1(B)$ of $\fat{R}^B$ consisting of all vectors of finite $1$-norm. This is due to $P$ being discrete.
\subsection{Local Properties of Duals}\label{section:local props of duals} We will need some technical information about the local structure of $\cube{}{P}$. The following results are well-known and appear in \cite{Sageev-thesis,Roller-duality}.
\begin{lemma}[vertex links in $\cube{}{P}$]\label{lemma:links and minimality} Let $P$ be a discrete poc set and let $V,V'\in P^\circ$ be vertices of $\cube{}{P}$. Then $V'$ is adjacent to $V$ in $\cube{}{P}$ if and only if $V'$ has the form
\begin{equation}\label{eqn:neighbour}
V'=\flip{a}{V}:=(V-\{a\})\cup\{a^\ast\}
\end{equation}
for $a\in\min(V)$, where $\min(V)$ denotes the set of minimal elements of $V$ with respect to the ordering induced on it from $P$.
\end{lemma}
The operation of replacing $V$ by $\flip{a}{V}$ will be called a {\it flip}. Clearly, any vertex of $\cube{}{P}$ is connected to any other by a finite sequence of flips. The fact that $\ellone{}(U,V)$ simply measures the minimal number of flips required to to turn $U$ into $V$ is central to the theory of discrete median algebras.
\medskip
A special situation occurs when several flips may be applied to a vertex in different orders of application without affecting the outcome. It is easy to verify that the hyperplanes being flipped form a transverse set in such a case, and, more generally we have the following lemma.
\begin{lemma}[cubes in $\cube{}{P}$]\label{lemma:cubes and transversality} Let $P$ be a discrete poc set and let $V\in P^\circ$ be a vertex in $\cube{}{P}$. Then the set of cubes of $\cube{}{P}$ incident to $V$ is in one-to-one correspondence with the transverse subsets of $\min(V)$. Moreover, for each such subset $A$ the vertices of the corresponding cube adjacent to $V$ are all of the form
\begin{equation}\label{eqn:vertices of a cube}
\flip{a_1,\ldots,a_m}{V}:=\flip{a_m}{\cdots\flip{a_2}{\flip{a_1}{V}}\cdots}
\end{equation}
where $(a_1,\ldots,a_m)$ is a sequence of distinct elements of $A$ and we agree to denote $\flip{\varnothing}{V}:=V$. The vertex $\flip{a_1,\ldots,a_m}{V}$ is independent of the ordering of the flips.
\end{lemma}
This lemma is very well illustrated by Example~\ref{Cartesian products}, demonstrating how the dimensions of cubes in the complex grow with the sizes of transverse subsets.
\subsection{Cubings as Median Spaces} The following facts were shown in \cite{Roller-duality,Niblo_Roller-property_T}.
\begin{proposition}[Poc set duals are median]\label{poc set duals are median} Let $P$ be a discrete poc set and let $B\in P^\circ$ be a basepoint in $\cube{}{P}$. Then each component of $(P^\circ,\ellone{})$ is a median metric space with the median map given by
\begin{equation}
\mathrm{med}(U,V,W)=(U\cap V)\cup(V\cap W)\cup(W\cap U).
\end{equation}
Moreover, the map $\rho:\cube{}{P}_B\to\ell^\infty(B)$ is a median-preserving isometric embedding.
\end{proposition}
The explicit form of the median map allows for a complete characterization of halfspaces and convex subsets of $(P^\circ,\ellone{})$.
\begin{proposition}[convex subsets of $P^\circ$] Let $P$ be a discrete poc set. The half-spaces of $(P^\circ,\ellone{})$ are precisely the sets of the form
\begin{equation}
V(a):=\set{U\in P^\circ}{a\in U}.
\end{equation}
In particular, the convex subsets of $P^\circ$ are precisely
\begin{equation}\label{convex subset of Pcirc}
V(A):=\bigcap_{a\in A}V(a)=\set{U\in P^\circ}{A\subseteq U}
\end{equation}
for $A$ ranging over all coherent subsets of $P$. Moreover,
\begin{equation}
a<b\text{ in }P\;\Leftrightarrow\; V(a)\subsetneq V(b)
\end{equation}
holds for all $a,b\in P$. Thus $P$ is naturally isomorphic to the poc set of halfspaces of $P^\circ$.
\end{proposition}
\bigskip
Our current goal is to extend this combinatorial structure theory of abstract cubings to meet the metric theory of median spaces at a point where we can plainly view finite cubings as `finitely presented median spaces', and proper median spaces as pointed Gromov-Hausdorff limits of finite cubings. For example, one would like to be able to reason in a way hinted at by Figure~\ref{fig:median limit}.
\begin{figure}[t]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=\columnwidth]{median_limit}
\end{center}
\caption{The unit ball in the $\ell^1$ plane (right) as a limit of a sequence (left to right) of rescaled cubings.\label{fig:median limit}}
\end{figure}
\subsection{Weighted Realizations of $\cube{}{P}$}\label{section:weighted cubings} Let $P$ be a discrete poc set, and let $B$ be a base point in $P^\circ$, fixed once and for all. Note that $\mbf{0}^\ast\in U$ for all $U\in P^\circ$, which makes $\mbf{0}^\ast$ an uninformative coordinate of $\fat{R}^B$ when it comes to representing vertices of $\cube{}{P}$.
\medskip
A more varied geometric realization of $\cube{}{P}$ is needed.
\begin{definition}[weight on a poc set] A weight on $P$ is a function $w:P\to\RR_{_{\geq 0}}$ satisfying $w(0)=0$ and $w(a^\ast)=w(a)$ for all $a\in P$. We say that a weight is non-degenerate if $w(a)>0$ for all proper $a\in P$. A weight $w$ is used for defining a map $\diag{w}:\fat{R}^B\to\fat{R}^B$ via the pointwise product $\diag{w}(x)=wx$.
\end{definition}
Given a weight $w$ on $P$ we revisit the map $\rho:P^\circ\to\fat{R}^B$, only that now we view it as a piecewise affine map of $\rho:S(P)\to\fat{R}^B$. Extending the construction from \cite{Niblo_Roller-property_T} slightly, we define a new embedded complex in $\fat{R}^B$.
\begin{definition}[$\ell^1$ realization of $\cube{}{P}$] Let $P$ be a discrete poc set with weight $w$ and basepoint $B\in P^\circ$. The {\it weighted dual $\cube{w}{P}_B$ of $P$ (with weight $w$ and basepoint $B$)} is defined to be the image of $\cube{}{P}_B$ under the map $\rho_w:\cube{}{P}\to\ell^1(B)$ obtained as the affine extension $\diag{w}\circ\rho:P^\circ\to\fat{R}^B$, endowed with the metric $\ellone{w}$ induced on it from $\ell^1(B)$.
\end{definition}
Some important observations:
\begin{proposition}[Properties of $\cube{w}{P}_B$]\label{properties of the weighted dual} Let $P$ be a discrete poc set with non-degenerate weight $w$ and basepoint $B\in P^\circ$. Then:
\begin{enumerate}
\item $\rho_w$ is a homeomorphism of $\cube{}{P}_B$ onto $\cube{w}{P}_B$. In particular, $\cube{w}{P}_B$ is a cubing.
\item $\ellone{w}$ is a piecewise-$\ell^1$ metric: $\ellone{w}$ coincides with the quotient metric on $\cube{w}{P}_B$ obtained by endowing each cube with the metric induced on it from $\ell^1(B)$ (and then carrying out the appropriate identifications).
\item $\rho_w$ restricts to a median-preserving map of $P^\circ$ into $\ell^1(B)$.
\item $\cube{w}{P}$ is a median metric space -- in fact, the smallest geodesic median subspace of $\ell^1(B)$ containing $\rho_w(P^\circ)$.
\end{enumerate}
\end{proposition}
\begin{proof} Property (1) holds by construction, as $\cube{}{P}$ and $\cube{w}{P}$ differ by the bijective (modulo collapsing the uninformative $\mbf{0}^\ast$ coordinate) stretching map $\diag{w}$.
To see (2), observe that a cube of $\cube{}{P}$ is mapped to a rectangular parallelopiped with edges parallel to the coordinate axes (RAP). Since paths that are piecewise parallel to the coordinate axes are geodesics in $\ell^1(B)$ provided they cross each hyperplane at most once, the quotient metric induced from endowing each RAP with the trace metric from $\ell^1(B)$ coincides with the distance measured along geodesics of $\ell^1(B)$ which do not exit $\cube{w}{P}_B$. The connectedness of $\cube{w}{P}_B=\rho_w(\cube{}{P}_B)$ finishes the proof.
Property (3) follows from \cite{Chatterji_Drutu_Haglund-measured_spaces_with_walls}, Lemma 3.12 and Theorem 5.1.
Property (4) is the tricky one. Our argument for (2) explains the fact of $\cube{w}{P}_B$ being a geodesic subspace of $\ell^1(B)$. One observes:
\begin{itemize}
\item[-] Since $P$ is discrete we must have $x(a)=y(a)=z(a)$ for all but finitely many $a\in P$, reducing the problem to the case when $P$ is finite;
\item[-] For any pair of vertices $U,W\in P^\circ$ sharing a cube in $\cube{}{P}_B$, if $Q$ is the minimal cube containing both $U$ and $W$ then $\rho_wQ=I(\rho_wU,\rho_wW)$, the interval calculated in $\ell^1(B)$, is the unique RAP with antipodal vertices $\rho_wU$ and $\rho_wW$. This explains the minimality property claimed in (4).
\end{itemize}
It remains to verify that the $\ell^1(B)$-median $\mathrm{med}(x,y,z)$ of a triple of points $x,y,z\in\cube{w}{P}_B$ is also contained in $\cube{w}{P}_B$. This verification is purely technical, and we omit the details in the interest of saving space, leaving only an outline of the argument: knowing that $\rho_w:P^\circ\to\ell^1(B)$ is median-preserving, one considers the set $A$ of all $a\in B$ for which at least one of $x(a),y(a),z(a)$ does not belong to $\{0,w(a)\}$. If $A$ is empty, then $x,y,z$ are vertices of $\cube{w}{P}$ -- images of points in $P^\circ$ under $\rho_w$, that is -- and there is nothing to prove. If $A$ is non-empty, observe that $A$ is a transverse set. Considering $m=\mathrm{med}(x,y,z)$ as a real-valued function of $B$ and recalling medians in $\ell^1(B)$ are computed coordinate-by-coordinate, we conclude that the value of $m$ on $B\smallsetminus A$ is determined by majority (as in the $A=\varnothing$ case), thus forcing $m$ into the unique cube whose vertices coincide with $m$ on $B\smallsetminus A$ and have arbitrary values $m(a)\in\{0,w(a)\}$ for all $a\in A$.
\end{proof}
\begin{definition} By a piecewise-$\ell^1$ cubing we mean a space of the form $\cube{w}{P}_B$ endowed with the metric $\ellone{w}$. This metric space will be denoted $\cubeone{w}{P}$. In the special case when $w(a)=1$ for all proper $a\in P$, we will identify $\cubeone{w}{P}=\cubeone{}{P}$, and refer to $\ellone{w}$ simply as $\ellone{}$.
\end{definition}
\begin{figure}[t]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=.6\columnwidth]{bad_cubing_2}
\end{center}
\caption{The space $X_t$ from Example~\ref{example:non-injective 1}, constructed as a weighted piecewise-$\ell^1$ cubing dual to the poc set $P$ from Example~\ref{example:non-injective 2}. Note how the walls drawn inside the three-dimensional cube match the non-singleton halfspaces of the poc set $P$.\label{fig:non-injective median space 2}}
\end{figure}
\begin{example}\label{example:non-injective 2} Revisiting Example~\ref{example:non-injective 1}, we represent the space $X_t$ (figure \ref{fig:non-injective median space}) from that example as a piecewise-$\ell^1$ cubing. First, the poc-set structure may be chosen to have the form $P=S\cup S^\ast\}$ where
\begin{displaymath}
S=\left\{\varnothing,
\{A\},\{B\},\{C\},\{D\},
\{A,B\},\{A,C\},\{A,D\}
\right\}
\end{displaymath}
with $P$ considered a sub poc set of $\power{\{A,B,C,D\}}$. Next we set the weights to equal
\begin{displaymath}
w(\text{singleton})=1-t\,,\;\;
w(\text{pair})=t.
\end{displaymath}
Note how the weights of walls separating any given pair of points in $\{A,B,C,D\}$ add up to $2$---see figure \ref{fig:non-injective median space 2}.
\end{example}
\subsection{Halfspaces and Walls of the Weighted Realization}
Understanding the open (closed) half-spaces of $\cube{w}{P}$ for non-degenerate $w$ is easy: they are the intersections of $\cube{w}{P}$ with the open (closed) halfspaces of $\ell^1(B)$. The latter all have the form
\begin{gather}
\half{b}(t):=\set{x\in\cube{w}{P}_B}{x(b)<t}\notag\\
\text{or}\\
\half{b^\ast}(t):=\set{x\in\cube{w}{P}_B}{x(b)>t}.\notag
\end{gather}
Note how, for any choice of $0<t<w(b)$ and $b\in B$, one has
\begin{equation}
\rho_w(P^\circ)\cap\half{b}(t)=V(b)
\end{equation}
so that the `abstract' halfspaces---the elements of $P$---are reconstructed from the `visual' half-spaces of the realization. It is common in the field to refer to the sets of the boundaries of half-spaces
\begin{equation}
\wall{b}(t)=\wall{b^\ast}(t)=\set{x\in\cube{w}{P}}{x(b)=t}\,,\qquad
0<t<w(b)
\end{equation}
as the {\it walls}, or {\it hyperplanes}, of the cubical complex $\cube{w}{P}$, noting that every wall separates $V(b)$ from $V(b^\ast)$ in $\cube{w}{P}$, while having a `thickness' of $w(b)$. The distances between vertices are influenced accordingly: the following expression for the distance between vertices $U,W\in P^\circ$ is derived directly from property (2) stated in Proposition~\ref{properties of the weighted dual}:
\begin{equation}\label{ellone formula}
\ellone{w}(\rho_wU,\rho_wW)=\sum_{a\in W\smallsetminus U}w(a)=\sum_{b\in U\smallsetminus W}w(b)\,,
\end{equation}
as $U\smallsetminus W$ indexes the set of walls separating $U$ from $W$.
\medskip
For a general pair of points $x,y\in\cube{w}{P}_B$ a similar formula may be written down.
\begin{definition}[separators]\label{defn:separator} Let $x,y\in\cube{w}{P}_B$. The {\it separator} of $x$ and $y$ is the set---denoted $x\smallsetminus y$ by abuse of notation---of all $a\in P$ such that either
\begin{itemize}
\item $a\in B$ and $x(a)<y(a)$;
\item $a^\ast\in B$ and $x(a)>y(a)$.
\end{itemize}
\end{definition}
\begin{remark} Note how, if $w$ is non-degenerate, one always has $\rho_wU\smallsetminus\rho_wW=U\smallsetminus W$ for $U,W\in P^\circ$. Thus, the separator of a pair of vertices is the same as their combinatorial separator in $P$.
\end{remark}
The distance formula then trivially becomes:
\begin{equation}\label{general ellone formula}
\ellone{w}(x,y)=\sum_{a\in x\smallsetminus y}\left|y(a)-x(a)\right|.
\end{equation}
There are two cases to consider for the summands:
\begin{itemize}
\item[-] $x(a)=0$ and $y(a)=w(a)$ produces a summand of $w(a)$. In this case we see that {\it every} wall of the form $\wall{a}(t)$ separates $X$ from $Y$ -- hence the contribution of $w(a)$ to the distance between the points.
\item[-] $0<x(a)<y(a)<w(a)$. In this case, the two points are contained in a thickened hyperplane of $\cube{w}{P}_B$, which is merely a direct product of an interval with the dual cubing of the sub poc set $P_{\pitchfork a}$ of all $b\in P$ satisfying $b\pitchfork a$.
\end{itemize}
\subsection{Degenerate Weights} Finally, the degenerate case is essentially identical to the non-degenerate one, as one may think of a null weight assigned to a wall as the limiting result of shrinking the thickness of that wall to zero. More formally, if the given weight $w$ is degenerate, the metric $\ellone{w}$ becomes a semi-metric. To obtain the reduction to the non-degenerate case, set:
\begin{equation}
Z=\set{a\in P}{a\neq\mbf{0},\mbf{0}^\ast\text{ and }w(a)=0}\,,\quad
\bar{P}:=P\smallsetminus Z\,,\quad
\bar{w}=w\res{\bar{P}}.
\end{equation}
It is straightforward to prove that the (unique) piecewise affine extension of the co-restriction map $P^\circ\to \bar{P}^\circ$ defined by $U\mapsto U\smallsetminus Z$ induces an isometry of $\hau{\cube{w}{P}}$ onto $\cube{\bar{w}}{\bar{P}}$.
\section{Piecewise-$\ell^\infty$ Cubings} We have finally arrived at the point where a formal and workable construction of piecewise-$\ell^\infty$ cubings is given.
\subsection{Generalities} In view of Sageev--Roller duality (Theorem~\ref{Sageev-Roller duality}) the definition of a piecewise-$\ell^\infty$ cubing from Section~\ref{section:geometric complexes} may be rewritten as follows.
\begin{definition} By a piecewise-$\ell^\infty$ cubing we mean a metric space of the form $\cube{w}{P}_B$, where $P$ is a discrete poc-set, $w$ is a non-degenerate weight and $B\in P^\circ$ is a basepoint. This time we endow $\cube{w}{P}_B$ with the quotient metric $\ellinfty{w}$ obtained by endowing each of the cubes of $\cube{w}{P}$ with the metric induced on it from $(\fat{R}^B,\norm{\cdot}_\infty)$. The resulting quotient space will be denoted $\cubeinfty{w}{P}_B$. By a {\it unit} piecewise-$\ell^\infty$ cubing we mean a space of the form $\cubeinfty{w}{P}_B$ with $w(a)=1$ for every proper $a\in P$. We denote this space with $\cubeinfty{}{P}_B$, and its metric with $\ellinfty{}$.
\end{definition}
A little bit more can be said about piecewise-$\ell^\infty$ cubings by applying results on quotient metrics from \cite{Bridson_Haefliger-nonpositive_curvature}, Chapter I.5.
\begin{lemma} Let $P$ be a finite poc set with weight $w$ and basepoint $B\in P^\circ$. Then the metric $\ellinfty{w}$ on $\cube{w}{P}_B$ is the length metric induced on $\cube{w}{P}_B$ from $(\fat{R}^B,\norm{\cdot}_\infty)$. Furthermore, $\cubeinfty{w}{P}_B$ is a complete geodesic metric space.\hfill $\square$
\end{lemma}
In fact, a little more can be said by applying pointed Gromov--Hausdorff convergence to adequately selected finite exhaustions of a locally finite cubing.
\begin{corollary}\label{cor:ellinfty is a length metric} Let $P$ be a discrete poc set with weight $w$ and basepoint $B\in P^\circ$. If the dual $\cube{}{P}_B$ is locally finite, then $\ellinfty{w}$ is the length metric on $\cube{w}{P}_B$ induced on it from $(\fat{R}^B,\norm{\cdot}_\infty)$, and $\cubeinfty{w}{P}_B$ is a complete geodesic metric space.\hfill $\square$
\end{corollary}
\subsection{Lower Bound on $\ellinfty{w}$} The following technical lemma places a lower bound on distances in $\cubeinfty{w}{P}$.
\begin{lemma}\label{separation lemma} Let $U,W\in P^\circ$ be vertices of $\cube{w}{P}$ and let $N$ be a finite nested subset of $U\smallsetminus W$. Then
\begin{equation}\label{eqn:separation bound}
\ellinfty{w}(\rho_wU,\rho_wW)\geq\sum_{a\in N}w(a):=w(N)\,.
\end{equation}
\end{lemma}
\begin{proof} For any $a\in P$, the sub-complex $X(a)$ of $X=\cube{w}{P}$ induced by the vertex set $V(a)\subset P^\circ$ is itself a cubing. We start by verifying that $\ellinfty{}(x,y)\geq w(a)$ for {\it any} $x\in X(a)$ and $y\in X(a^\ast)$: since the walls $\wall{a}(t)$, $t\in(0,w(a))$ separate $X(a)$ from $X(a^\ast)$ in $X$, every broken path $\mbf{q}=(x_0,x_1,\ldots,x_n)$ from $x$ to $y$ in $X$ must satisfy
\begin{equation}
\length{\mbf{q}}\geq \sum_{i=1}^n |x_i(a)-x_{i-1}(a)|\geq |x_0(a)-x_n(a)|\geq w(a)\,,
\end{equation}
by the triangle inequality.
\medskip
Now, if $N\subset U\smallsetminus W$ is nested, then for any $a,b\in N$ we {\it cannot} have $a\leq b^\ast$, since $a,b\in U$ and $U$ is coherent. Neither can we have $a^\ast\leq b$, for $a^\ast,b^\ast\in W$ and $W$ is coherent. We are left with $a\leq b$ or $b\leq a$ for all $a,b\in N$. Thus, when $N$ is finite we may write $N=\{a_1,\ldots,a_n\}$ with $a_1<a_2<\ldots<a_n$, which gives:
\begin{equation}
\begin{array}{rcccl}
\rho_wU&\in& X(a_1)\subset X(a_2)\subset\cdots\subset X(a_n)&&\\[.5em]
&&X(a_1^\ast)\supset X(a_2^\ast)\supset\cdots\supset X(a_n^\ast) &\ni&\rho_wW.
\end{array}
\end{equation}
The fact that each $X(a_i)$ and $X(a_j^\ast)$ is an $\ell^\infty$-cubing in its own right allows us to repeatedly apply the preceding argument to conclude
\begin{equation}
\ellinfty{w}(\rho_wU,\rho_wW)\geq\sum_{i=1}^nw(a_i)
\end{equation}
as desired.
\end{proof}
An immediate corollary is the following.
\begin{corollary} Let $P$ be a discrete poc set with weight $w$. Then the inclusion map
\begin{displaymath}
inc_{_Q}:(Q,\norm{\cdot}_\infty)\to(\cube{w}{P},\ellinfty{w})
\end{displaymath}
is an isometric embedding for every face $Q$ of $\cube{w}{P}$.\hfill $\square$
\end{corollary}
Recall that a geodesic in a metric space $(X,d)$ from a point $x$ to a point $y$ is an isometric embedding $\gamma:[0,d(x,y)]\to X$ satisfying $\gamma(0)=x$ and $\gamma(d(x,y))=y$. A discretized version of this notion for our purposes is the following definition.
\begin{definition} We say that a broken path $\mbf{p}$ from $x$ to $y$ in $\cube{w}{P}$ is {\it geodesic}, if $\length{\mbf{p}}=\ellinfty{w}(x,y)$.
\end{definition}
The proof of the last lemma produces an obvious lower bound on the length of a geodesic between two vertices of $\cube{w}{P}$.
\begin{corollary}\label{lower bound on distance} Let $P$ be a discrete poc set with weight $w$. Then the bound
\begin{equation}
\ellinfty{w}(\rho_wU,\rho_wW)\geq
\max\set{w(N)}{N\text{ is a chain in }U\smallsetminus W}
\end{equation}
holds for any $U,W\in P^\circ$.\hfill $\square$
\end{corollary}
\subsection{Constructing Geodesics in Unit $\ell^\infty$-cubings} Assume for now that all the weights on $P$ are unity. We now consider a special family of broken paths introduced in \cite{Niblo_Reeves-biautomatic}.
\begin{definition} A broken path $(U_0,\ldots,U_m)$ of vertices in $\cube{w}{P}$ is said to be a {\it normal cube path}, if
\begin{equation}
U_i\smallsetminus U_{i+1}=\min(U_i\smallsetminus U_m)
\end{equation}
for all $i=0,\ldots,m-1$.
\end{definition}
It is easy to verify that $\min(U\smallsetminus V)$ is a transverse subset of $P$ for any pair of vertices $U,V\in P^\circ$. Thus, a normal cube path from $U$ to $V$ has the form:
\begin{equation}
U_0=U\,,\;
U_1=\flip{\min(U_0\smallsetminus V)}{U_0}\,,\;\ldots\;,\,
U_{k+1}=\flip{\min(U_k\smallsetminus V)}{U_k}\,,\;\ldots
\end{equation}
and in particular:
\begin{itemize}
\item Normal cube paths are taut;
\item Each consecutive pair of vertices along a normal cube path are at unit distance from each other (as they span the diagonal of an embedded unit $\ell^\infty$-cube);
\item Thus, the length $\length{\mbf{p}}$ of a normal cube path $\mbf{p}$ as in the definition above equals $m$.
\end{itemize}
These two properties hint at the possibility that a normal cube path is, in fact an $\ell^\infty$-geodesic. In any case, the length of such a path provides one with an upper bound on the distance between its endpoints. We use normal cube paths to prove the following:
\begin{proposition}\label{length of normal cube path} For every $U,W\in P^\circ$ one has the formula
\begin{equation}\label{eqn:unit ellinfty formula}
\ellinfty{}(\rho U,\rho W)=\max\set{|N|}{N\subseteq U\smallsetminus W\text{ is nested}}.
\end{equation}
\end{proposition}
\begin{proof} Let $\mbf{p}=(U_0,\ldots,U_m)$ be the normal cube path from $U_0=U$ to $U_m=W$. In $\cubeinfty{}{P}$ this implies $\length{\mbf{p}}=m$. Setting $A_{i+1}=U_i\smallsetminus U_{i+1}$ for $i=0,\ldots,m-1$ we have:
\begin{enumerate}
\item $A_i$ is transverse, for all $i=1,\ldots,m$;
\item $U\smallsetminus W=\bigcup_{i=1}^m A_i$ and this union is disjoint.
\end{enumerate}
In particular, any nested set $N\subseteq U\smallsetminus W$ intersects every $A_i$ in at most one point, and therefore satisfies $|N|\leq m$.
\medskip
Now for any $i>1$ and any $a_i\in A_i$ we observe that $a_i\in U_{i-1}\smallsetminus U_m$. At the same time, by the definition of a normal cube path,
\begin{equation}
A_{i-1}=U_{i-1}\smallsetminus U_i=\min(U_{i-1}-U_m)
\end{equation}
and we conclude that there has to be some $a_{i-1}\in A_{i-1}$ with $a_{i-1}<a_i$. Starting with any $a_m\in A_m$ we thus obtain at least one chain $N=\{a_1,\ldots,a_m\}$ with $a_i\in A_i$ for all $i$. Thus, $U\smallsetminus W$ contains a nested subset of cardinality $m$. We conclude:
\begin{equation}
\ellinfty{}(U,W)\leq\length{\mbf{p}}=\max\set{|N|}{N\text{ is a nested subset of }U\smallsetminus W}.
\end{equation}
The reverse inequality was established previously, in Corollary~\ref{lower bound on distance}, so we are done.
\end{proof}
As a by-product of this proof we also obtain the following corollary.
\begin{corollary}\label{normal implies geodesic} In a unit piecewise-$\ell^\infty$ cubing, normal cube paths are geodesic broken paths.
\end{corollary}
\subsection{Subdivisions of $\ell^\infty$ Cubings}\label{section:subdivision} We are looking for an operation on poc sets that would result in subdividing each cube of the dual cubing into a `grid' of smaller cubes.
\medskip
\begin{definition}[Refinement] We will say that a morphism of poc sets $f:\tilde P\to P$ is a {\it refinement map} -- and that $\tilde P$ is a refinement of $P$---if $f^{{\scriptscriptstyle -1}}(\mbf{0})=\{\mbf{0}\}$, and for any proper pair $p,q\in P$ one has:
\begin{enumerate}
\item $f^{{\scriptscriptstyle -1}}(p)$ is a finite chain in $\tilde P$,
\item for any $\tilde p\in f^{{\scriptscriptstyle -1}} p$ and $\tilde q\in f^{{\scriptscriptstyle -1}} q$ one has $\tilde p<\tilde q\;\Leftrightarrow\; p<q$.
\end{enumerate}
\end{definition}
\medskip
We will now show that this notion of refinement produces the correct notion of subdivision in the dual. The idea is, roughly, that---since each cube $Q$ of $\cube{}{P}$ is characterized by a transverse set of walls (Lemma~\ref{lemma:cubes and transversality})---if each of these walls were to be replicated into a linear sub poc set (in $\tilde P$), then the dual of the union of these linear refinements is the cartesian product of subdivided intervals; i.e., a subdivided cube (see Examples~\ref{Cartesian products} and \ref{dual of linear}, respectively).
\begin{proposition}[subdivision lemma]\label{subdivision} Let $f:\tilde P\to P$ be a refinement of a discrete poc set $P$ and let $w,\tilde w$ be weights on $P$ and on $\tilde P$ respectively, satisfying $w(p)=\sum_{a\in\sigma^{{\scriptscriptstyle -1}}(p)}\tilde w(a)$ for all $p\in P$. Then for any choice of $B\in P^\circ$, setting $\tilde{B}=f^{{\scriptscriptstyle -1}}(B)\in \tilde P^\circ$ there is a bijection $F$ of $\cube{w}{P}_B$ onto $\cube{\tilde w}{\tilde P}_{\tilde B}$ with the following properties:
\begin{enumerate}
\item $F$ extends the dual map $f^\circ:P^\circ\to\tilde P^\circ$ given by $f^\circ(U)=f^{{\scriptscriptstyle -1}}(U)$;
\item $F$ is an isometry of $\cubeone{w}{P}$ onto $\cubeone{\tilde w}{\tilde P}$ (in particular, $F$ is a median isomorphism);
\item For each proper $p\in P$, if one writes $f^{{\scriptscriptstyle -1}}(p)=\{\tilde p_1,\ldots,\tilde p_n\}$, $n=n(p)$, with $\tilde p_1<\ldots<\tilde p_n$ then there are reals $0<t_1<\ldots<t_n<w(p)$ such that $F(\half{p}(t_k))=\half{p_k}(\tfrac{\tilde w(p_k)}{2})$ for all $k\in\{1,\ldots,n\}$;
\item $F$ is an isometry of $\cubeinfty{w}{P}$ onto $\cubeinfty{\tilde w}{\tilde P}$.
\end{enumerate}
\end{proposition}
\begin{proof} Let $X=\cube{w}{P}_B$ and $\tilde X=\cube{\tilde w}{\tilde P}_{\tilde B}$. For each $p\in P$, writing $f^{{\scriptscriptstyle -1}}(p)=\{\tilde p_1,\ldots,\tilde p_n\}$ as above, set $t_1=\tfrac{\tilde w(\tilde p_1)}{2}$ and $t_{k+1}=\sum_{i=1}^k\tilde w(\tilde p_i)+\tfrac{\tilde w(\tilde p_{k+1})}{2}$ for $1\leq k<n$. Let $\hsm{H}$ denote the set of half-spaces of $(X,\ellone{w})$ arising as $\half{}(p,k):=X\cap\half{p}(t_k)$ for all $p\in P$ and $\tilde p_k\in f^{{\scriptscriptstyle -1}}(p)$, augmented with $\{\varnothing,X\}$ to make it into a sub poc set of $\power{X}$ with respect to inclusion and the complementation operator $h\mapsto X\smallsetminus\cl{h}$. Observe that the map sending each $\half{}(p,k)$ to $p$ is a refinement map factoring as the composition of $f:\tilde P\to P$ over the isomorphism sending each $\half{}(p,k)\in\hsm{H}$ to the appropriate $\tilde p_k\in\tilde P$. In particular, the poc sets $\tilde P$ and $\hsm{H}$ have the same dual median space. Since $\hsm{H}$ is a half-space system in the median space $(X,\ellone{w})$, its dual median space is isometric to $(X,\ellone{w})$ (see \cite{Chatterji_Drutu_Haglund-measured_spaces_with_walls}, Theorem 5.12 and Lemma 3.12).
Finally, the piecewise-$\ell^\infty$ distance is preserved because the combinatorial information --- the links of the cubical faces --- is preserved.
\end{proof}
\section{Deforming Piecewise-$\ell^\infty$ Cubings}
We begin with a rather coarse estimation of the Gromov--Hausdorff distance between $\ell^\infty$-cubings sharing the same combinatorial structure:
\begin{lemma}\label{ellinfty deformation GH distance bound} Let $P$ be a finite poc set and $B\in P^\circ$ be a basepoint. Let $u,w$ be non-degenerate weights on $P$. Then the pair of spaces $X=\cubeinfty{u}{P}_B$ and $Y=\cubeinfty{w}{P}_B$ admits an $\epsilon$-approximation for any $\epsilon>\norm{u-w}_1$.
\end{lemma}
\begin{proof} Denote $X=\cubeinfty{u}{P}$, $Y=\cubeinfty{w}{P}$, $\epsilon=\norm{u-w}_1$ and let $\delta>0$. Without loss of generality we may assume that the diameter of a cube in either space does not exceed $\delta$: otherwise, construct a refinement $f:\tilde P\to P$ admitting weights $\tilde u$ and $\tilde w$ with the property that every cube of $\tilde X=\cubeinfty{\tilde u}{\tilde P}_{\tilde B}$ and of $\tilde Y=\cubeinfty{\tilde w}{\tilde P}$ has diameter no more than $\delta$; Proposition~\ref{subdivision} tells us we may replace $X$ and $Y$ by the spaces $\tilde X$ and $\tilde Y$, respectively, while replacing $P$ by $\tilde P$ and retaining $\norm{\tilde u-\tilde w}_1=\epsilon$.
We proceed to define a relation $R\subseteq X\times Y$ by setting $(x,y)\in R$ if and only if the points $\rho^{{\scriptscriptstyle -1}}_u(x)$ and $\rho^{{\scriptscriptstyle -1}}_w(y)$ share a cube in $\cube{}{\tilde P}_B$.
Take points $x,x'\in X$ and $y,y'\in Y$ satisfying $(x,y)\in R$ and $(x',y')\in R$. If $\mbf{p}$ is a taut broken path in $X$ from $x$ to $x'$ of total length $\lambda$, then $\mbf{p}'=\rho_w\rho^{{\scriptscriptstyle -1}}_u\mbf{p}$ is a taut broken path in $y$ of length at most $\lambda+\epsilon$. Replacing the initial and terminal points of $\mbf{p}'$ with $y$ and $y'$ respectively creates a broken path in $Y$ of length at most $\lambda+\epsilon+2\delta$, providing us with the bound \[\ellinfty{w}(y,y')\leq\ellinfty{u}{x,x'}+\epsilon+2\delta\] Symmetry takes care of \[\ellinfty{u}(x,x')\leq\ellinfty{w}(y,y')+\epsilon+2\delta\] and the result follows.
\end{proof}
\begin{remark} The same argument works for piecewise-$\ell^1$, as well as piecewise-$\ell^2$ cubings. One only needs to observe a more serious dependence of the $\delta$-dependent overhead in the above estimate on the cardinality of $P$.
\end{remark}
Thus, small deformations of the weight on a piecewise-$\ell^\infty$ cubing result in only small changes in the distances between its points. This allows us to apply our slightly deeper understanding of unit cubings to the study of the more general locally-compact case.
\begin{definition} Let $P$ be a discrete poc set endowed with a weight $w$. The {\it $n$-th lower rational approximation $\zapprox{n}{P,w}$ of $P$} is obtained as follows: For all $p\in P$ set $u(p)=\floor{n\cdot w(p)}$ and let $\zapprox{n}{P,w}$ denote the unique refinement of the weighted poc set $(P,u)$ with unit weights, rescaled by a factor of $\tfrac{1}{n}$.
\end{definition}
An immediate corollary of the preceding lemma is the following approximation lemma.
\begin{proposition}[Approximation Lemma]\label{prop:approximation lemma} Let $P$ be a discrete poc set with weight $w$ and base point $B\in P^\circ$, and let $X_n$ denote the dual of its $n$-th lower rational approximation, $n\in\fat{N}$, with the appropriate basepoint $B_n$. If $\cube{}{P}_B$ is locally finite, then the sequence $(X_n,B_n)$ converges to $(\cube{w}{P}_B,\rho_wB)$ in the pointed Gromov-Hausdorff topology both as $\ell^\infty$ and as $\ell^1$ cubings. In particular, if $x,y\in\cube{w}{P}_B$ and $x_n,y_n$ are vertices of $X_n$ with $x_n\to x$, $y_n\to y$ and $\mbf{p}_n$ is the normal cube path from $x_n$ to $y_n$, then the sequence $(\mbf{p}_n)_{n=1}^\infty$ converges to a geodesic arc in $X$ joining $x$ with $y$.
\end{proposition}
\begin{proof} Local finiteness of $\cube{}{P}$ implies it is enough to prove both our claims for the case when $P$ is finite. By the preceding lemma, the Gromov--Hausdorff distance between $P$ and $\zapprox{n}{P}$ does not exceed $\tfrac{|P|}{n}$, as required.
\end{proof}
As a corollary we obtain the promised reduction of our main result to the finite unit case.
\begin{corollary} If every finite unit piecewise-$\ell^\infty$ cubing is injective, then every locally finite piecewise-$\ell^\infty$ cubing is injective.
\end{corollary}
\begin{proof} Simply apply Lemma~\ref{proof of limit lemma} to the result of the last proposition.
\end{proof}
Among the many consequences of Proposition~\ref{prop:approximation lemma} let us highlight the few most useful to our cause. Having reduced our problem to the case of finite unit cubings, let us see what we could glean from studying this special case using rational approximations. Clearly, $\zapprox{n}{P}$ for a unit-weighted finite poc set $P$ produces a refinement $P_n$ where each $d$-dimensional cube of $\cubeinfty{}{P}$ is subdivided into $n^d$ cubes of edge-length $\tfrac{1}{n}$. As a result, both $\cubeinfty{}{P}$ and $\cubeone{}{P}$ may be represented as Gromov--Hausdorff limits of the discrete rescaled spaces $K_n:=\tfrac{1}{n}(P_n^\circ,\ellinfty{})$ and $M_n:=\tfrac{1}{n}(P_n^\circ,\ellone{})$, respectively. As a consequence we obtain, for this special setting, the following corollary.
\begin{corollary} Every closed ball $B(p,r)$ in $\cubeinfty{}{P}$ is the limit of a sequence of balls $B(p_n,r_n)\subset K_n$ with $r_n\geq r$. A closed subset $h\subset\cubeone{}{P}$ is a half-space if and only if it is the limit of a sequence of halfspaces $h_n\subset M_n$.
\end{corollary}
As a result we obtain an even deeper reduction of the main result to a finite, discrete problem.
\begin{corollary}\label{final reduction} If every finite poc set has the property
\begin{equation}
\text{Any ball of integer radius in } (P^\circ,\ellinfty{}) \text{ is a convex subset of } (P^\circ,\ellone{}) \tag{$\dagger$}
\end{equation}
then every locally finite piecewise-$\ell^\infty$ cubing is an injective metric space.
\end{corollary}
\begin{proof} By the preceding corollary, if every finite poc set has $(\dagger)$, then every ball in any finite piecewise-$\ell^\infty$ cubing $X$ is $\ell^1$-convex. By Helly's theorem (Theorem~\ref{Helly theorem}), any finite family of pairwise-intersecting balls $X$ has a common point. Since $X$ is a geodesic space, hyper-convexity follows.
\end{proof}
\section{Proof of the Main Result, Final Remarks}
In view of Corollary~\ref{final reduction}, proving our main theorem requires merely the verification of property ($\dagger$) for finite poc sets $P$.
\begin{lemma}\label{ball-separation lemma} Let $P$ be a finite poc set and let $U,W\in P^\circ$ be vertices with $\ellinfty(U,W)>n$, $n\in\fat{N}$. Then there exists a wall of $P$ separating $W$ from the $\ell^\infty$-ball of radius $n$ about $U$.
\end{lemma}
\begin{proof} Let $B$ denote the $\ell^\infty$-ball of radius $n$ about $U$. Consider the normal cube path $\mbf{p}=(U_0,\ldots,U_m)$, $m=\ellinfty{}(U,W)$ from $U$ to $W$. As in the proof of proposition \ref{length of normal cube path}, let us write $A_i=U_i\smallsetminus U_{i-1}$ while observing that $U\smallsetminus W$ equals the {\it disjoint} union $A_1\cup\cdots\cup A_m$. Pick any $a\in A_m$ and construct a chain $a_1<\ldots<a_{m-1}<a_m=a$ with $a_i\in A_i$ -- again, as in the proof of Proposition~\ref{length of normal cube path}.
We contend that the wall $\{a,a^\ast\}$ is a wall of the kind we are looking for, that is:
\begin{enumerate}
\item The vertex $W$ is contained in $V(a^\ast)$;
\item The ball $B$ is contained in $V(a)$.
\end{enumerate}
Indeed, (1) is satisfied by construction: $a\notin W$ means $a^\ast\in W$, which, in turn, means $W\in V(a^\ast)$.
Property (2) holds by Lemma~\ref{separation lemma}: indeed, any vertex in $V(a^\ast)$ is separated from $U$ by the nested set $\{a_1,\ldots,a_n\}$ and is therefore at $\ell^\infty$-distance at least $n$ from $U$. Since $V(a)=P^\circ\smallsetminus V(a^\ast)$ we conclude $B\subseteq V(a)$ and we are done.
\end{proof}
\bigskip
To close, we would like to draw the reader's attention to an alternative line of reasoning having the added benefit of clarifying some leftover questions regarding the metric structure of a piecewise-$\ell^\infty$ cubing. Reading through our own exposition we felt that, in the end, one could not help but wonder at the effort we have put into avoiding a direct computation of $\ellinfty{w}$ in the general case. Why only the unit case?
\begin{figure}[t]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=.5\columnwidth]{bad_normal_cube_path}
\end{center}
\caption{An example of a non-geodesic normal cube path (left) in a piecewise-$\ell^\infty$ cubing versus a geodesic one in a refined (and hence isometric) cubing (right) -- see Example~\ref{example:bad normal cube path}.\label{fig:bad normal cube path}}
\end{figure}
\begin{example}\label{example:bad normal cube path} Figure \ref{fig:bad normal cube path} compares a weighted cubing drawn in the $\ell^\infty$ plane where the normal cube path joining a pair of points fails to be a geodesic broken path to a subdivided version of the same cubing, where the normal cube path between the same two points changes into a geodesic one, due to the weights being more uniformly distributed among the walls of the refined poc set.
\end{example}
This example suggests it should be possible to apply the Approximation Lemma (Proposition~\ref{prop:approximation lemma}) in a proof of an explicit formula for $\ellinfty{w}$ based on the formula for unit cubings. One can verify that this is indeed the case:
\begin{proposition} Let $P$ be a discrete poc set with non-degenerate weight $w$ and basepoint $B\in P^\circ$. Then, for any $x,y\in\cube{w}{P}_B$ one has
\begin{equation}
\ellinfty{w}(x,y)=\max\set{\sum_{a\in N}|x(a)-y(a)|}{N\text{ is a nested subset of }x\smallsetminus y}
\end{equation}
(see Definition~\ref{defn:separator}).\hfill $\square$
\end{proposition}
Skipping the proof, we would like to observe the fact that the convexity of balls in $\cubeinfty{w}{P}$ now becomes self-evident: if $y\notin B(x,r)$ in $\cubeinfty{w}{P}$, then the above formula provides us with a hyperplane of $\cubeone{w}{P}$ separating $y$ from $B(x,r)$ using essentially the same procedure as we had used in the proof of Lemma~\ref{ball-separation lemma}, avoiding the need for a reduction of the statement regarding the injectivity of piecewise-$\ell^\infty$ cubings to the finite, unit, vertex-only case.
This argument seems to apply Gromov--Hausdorff convergence more sparingly, but ultimately it does nothing but shift the weight (of the technical details) around. On an emotional note, we admit our preference of strategy was motivated by a sense of indebtedness to Isbell's vision: not only did he reveal the way (first followed by Mai and Tang), but he also provided the machinery (the duality theory of median algebras) for the present extension. It would have been ungrateful of us to have picked a different path.
\section{Acknowledgements} The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of Air Force Office of Science Research under the LRIR 12RY02COR, MURI FA9550-10-1-0567 and FA9550-11-10223 grants, respectively.
|
\section{Introduction}
The interaction of horizontal shear flows and magnetic fields in stably
stratified layers is central to many problems in astrophysical fluid dynamics
--- involving, for example, planetary interiors, stellar radiative zones and
accretion discs. An important example of such a flow, which has received
considerable attention recently, is that of the solar tachocline (see Hughes,
Rosner \& Weiss \citeyear{Hughes-et-al-Tachocline}). The tachocline, discovered
via helioseismic observations, is a thin layer in the Sun, extending downwards
from the (neutrally stable) base of the convective zone to the (stably
stratified) top of the radiative interior, characterised by radial velocity
shear and also planetary scale horizontal shears, associated with the equator to
pole differential rotation of the Sun. Most models of the solar dynamo invoke
the tachocline as the site for the storage and generation of the Sun's strong,
predominantly toroidal magnetic field.
Here we are interested in the stability of such shear flows, and how this
depends upon the velocity profile, magnetic field strength, and stratification.
Specifically, we consider the linear stability of a steady parallel flow and
aligned magnetic field, both sheared in the horizontal cross-stream direction,
in the inviscid and perfectly conducting limit. In this first study, we consider
the case where there is no background rotation. The nonlinear regime of such
instabilities typically leads to turbulent flows; these may be important for
dynamo action, through some mean-field $\alpha$-effect, and also for the
transport of mass and momentum, which can feed back on the large-scale flow.
It is possible to examine the stability of such flows in a continuously
stratified three-dimensional setting \citep[e.g.,][]{MiuraPritchett82, Cally03}.
However, here we adopt the alternative approach of considering the dynamics of a
thin fluid layer under the shallow-water approximation, which is valid when the
horizontal length scale of the motion is long compared with the depth of the
fluid layer, as is typically the case in large-scale astrophysical flows. This
leads to a set of two-dimensional partial differential equations, with no
explicit dependence on the vertical co-ordinate, which offers a considerable
mathematical simplification. Such shallow-water equations capture the
fundamental dynamics of density stratification, including gravity waves, and
allow the interaction of stratification with horizontal shear flows and magnetic
fields to be analysed in the simplest possible setting.
It should be noted that hydrodynamic shallow-water models, which date back to
Laplace, are derived by considering a thin fluid layer of constant density
bounded below by a rigid medium and above by a fluid of negligible inertia
\citep[e.g.,][\S3.1]{Vallis-GFD}. The corresponding reduction for electrically
conducting fluids --- the shallow-water magnetohydrodynamic (SWMHD) equations of
\cite{Gilman00} --- additionally requires the fluid layer to be a perfect
conductor, and to be bounded above and below by perfect conductors. There are
few direct astrophysical analogues for such a configuration. However, we can
borrow an important idea from planetary atmospheric dynamics, where the
hydrodynamic shallow-water equations are widely used to understand waves and
instabilities in a continuously stratified atmospheric layer. This is justified
because there is a formal mathematical analogy between the linearised equations
in the two systems, provided the layer depth in the shallow-water model is taken
to be a so-called equivalent depth \cite[e.g.,][\S6.11]{Gill-GFD}, so that the
shallow-water gravity wave speed (in the horizontal) matches that of (the
fastest) gravity waves in a continuously stratified layer. We have this analogy
in mind throughout this study.
The SWMHD equations have been studied widely in recent years. They have been
shown to possess a hyperbolic as well as a Hamiltonian structure
\citep{DeSterck01, Dellar02}, and to support wave motions such as
inertia-gravity waves and Alfv\'en waves \citep{Schecter-et-al01,
Zaqarashvili-et-al08, HengSpitkovsky09}. As reviewed by \cite{GilmanCally07},
they have also been used to study the linear instability of shear flows in
spherical geometry, often with modelling tachocline instabilities in mind. These
previous studies considered basic states that were functions only of latitude,
investigating the dependence of the instabilities on the strength and spatial
structure of the magnetic field and on a (reduced) gravity parameter
\citep{GilmanDikpati02, Dikpati-et-al03}.
In contrast to previous investigations of the instabilities of shear flows in
SWMHD, which focused on global instabilities in spherical geometry,
here we concentrate on local instabilities, with the aim of examining
the linear instability problem in a wider context; for this, we consider the
problem in planar geometry. We first derive some growth rate bounds and
stability criteria, valid for general basic states. We then study how the
instability characteristics of prototypical flows are modified by the combined
action of magnetic fields and stratification, which, in isolation, are generally
thought to be stabilising. The corresponding hydrodynamic problem has a long
history, dating back to Rayleigh, and we are able to draw upon
ideas and methods from a substantial literature
\citep[e.g.,][]{DrazinReid-Stability, Vallis-GFD}.
We start, in \S2, by formulating the linear instability problem for
plane-parallel basic states with the flow and field dependent on the
cross-stream direction. In \S3, we derive extensions of classical growth rate
bounds, semi-circle theorems, stability criteria, and parity results for modal
solutions. In \S4, instabilities of piecewise-constant velocity profiles (the
vortex sheet and the rectangular jet) with a uniform magnetic field are examined
analytically. Analogous smooth profiles (the hyperbolic-tangent shear layer and
the Bickley jet) are studied in \S5, both numerically and asymptotically, via a
generalisation of the long-wave analysis of \cite{DrazinHoward62}. The primary
instability mechanism for shear layers is interpreted in terms of
counter-propagating Rossby waves. The results are discussed in \S6.
\section{Mathematical formulation}
\subsection{Governing equations}
We consider a thin layer of perfectly electrically conducting fluid moving under
the influence of gravity. We use a Cartesian geometry, with horizontal
coordinates $x$ and $y$, and an upwards pointing coordinate $z$. At time $t$,
the fluid, which is taken to be inviscid and of constant density $\rho$, has a
free surface at $z = h(x,y,t)$ and is bounded below by a rigid impermeable
boundary at $z=-H(x,y)$.
We consider motions with a characteristic horizontal length scale $L_0$ that is
long compared with a characteristic layer depth $H_0$. One can then make a
shallow-water reduction in which the vertical momentum balance is taken to be
magneto-hydrostatic, and for which the horizontal velocity $\boldsymbol{u}$ and horizontal
magnetic field ${\boldsymbol{B}}$ are independent of $z$. When the bottom boundary is
perfectly electrically conducting (and is thus a magnetic field line) and the
free surface remains a field line, the magnetic shallow-water equations of
\cite{Gilman00} are obtained. These are an extension of the classical
shallow-water equations of geophysical fluid dynamics.
We use these equations in non-dimensional form. We denote the characteristic
horizontal velocity of the basic state by $U_0$, and the characteristic magnetic
field strength by $B_0$. Non-dimensionalising $x$ and $y$ by $L_0$, $t$ by the
advective time-scale $L_0/U_0$, $H$ by $H_0$, $h$ by $U_0^2/g$ (where $g$ is the
acceleration due to gravity), velocity by $U_0$, and magnetic field by $B_0$,
the SWMHD equations are
\begin{subequations}\label{ch3:basic-equation}
\begin{align}
\frac{\partial\boldsymbol{u}}{\partial{t}}+\boldsymbol{u}\cdot\nabla\boldsymbol{u} & = -\nabla h + M^2 {\boldsymbol{B}}\cdot\nabla{\boldsymbol{B}},
\label{ch3:basic-equation1} \\
\frac{\partial{\boldsymbol{B}}}{\partial{t}}+\boldsymbol{u}\cdot\nabla{\boldsymbol{B}} & = {\boldsymbol{B}}\cdot\nabla\boldsymbol{u},
\label{ch3:basic-equation2} \\
F^{2}\frac{\partial{h}}{\partial{t}}+\nabla\cdot\left((H+F^{2}h)\boldsymbol{u}\right) & =0,
\label{ch3:basic-equation3}
\end{align}
\end{subequations}
where $F=U_0/\sqrt{gH_0}$ and $M=(B_0/\sqrt{\mu\rho})/U_0$, with $\mu$ being the
permeability of the fluid. In addition to (\ref{ch3:basic-equation}$a$--$c$),
the shallow-water reduction implies
\begin{equation}\label{ch3:basic-equation4}
\nabla\cdot\left((H+F^{2}h){\boldsymbol{B}}\right)=0.
\end{equation}
However, \eqref{ch3:basic-equation4} need not be considered explicitly; if it is
satisfied at some initial time, then (\ref{ch3:basic-equation}$a$--$c$)
guarantee that it remains satisfied for all time.
The system has two non-dimensional parameters. The Froude number $F$ is the
ratio of the characteristic horizontal velocity of the basic state to the
gravity wave speed $\sqrt{gH_0}$ (and is related to the reduced gravity
parameter $G$ of \cite{GilmanDikpati02} via $G=F^{-2}$). The parameter $M$ is
the ratio of the Alfv\'en wave speed $B_0/\sqrt{\mu \rho}$ to the characteristic
horizontal velocity of the basic state. When $H$ is constant and $F \rightarrow
0$, (\ref{ch3:basic-equation3}) and (\ref{ch3:basic-equation4}) become $\nabla
\cdot \boldsymbol{u} = 0$ and $\nabla \cdot {\boldsymbol{B}} = 0$ respectively, and we recover the
equations for two-dimensional incompressible magnetohydrodynamics, with $h$
playing the role of pressure. When $M \rightarrow 0$,
\eqref{ch3:basic-equation2} decouples from (\ref{ch3:basic-equation}$a$--$c$),
and we recover the hydrodynamic shallow-water equations; these have a well-known
correspondence with two-dimensional compressible hydrodynamics
\citep[e.g.,][\S3.1]{Vallis-GFD}, which we exploit from time to time.
As an example of astrophysical parameter values, we estimate $F$ and $M$ in the
solar tachocline, using data from \cite{Gough07}. We set $U_0$ to be the equator
to pole difference in the zonal velocity, implying $U_0 \approx 500 \,{\rm m \,
s^{-1}}$. There is considerable uncertainty in the strength of the magnetic
field in the tachocline \citep{Hughes-et-al-Tachocline}, although a likely range
is $10^3 \, {\rm G} \lesssim B_0 \lesssim 10^5 \, {\rm G}$. Then, taking $\rho =
210\,{\rm kg \, m^{-3}}$, we find $0.01 \lesssim M \lesssim 1$. To estimate $F$,
we must choose a gravity wave speed $\sqrt{gH_0}$ for the layer. One means of
doing this is to take $H_0$ to be the depth of the tachocline and to interpret
$g$ as a reduced gravity, accounting for the fractional density difference of
the overlying fluid, as in \cite{DikpatiGilman01}. However, here we pursue the
analogy between shallow-water flows and those of a continuously stratified layer
with buoyancy frequency $N$ and depth $H_1$, and choose $\sqrt{gH_0}$ to be the
speed of the fastest gravity wave in such a layer, which is $NH_1/\pi$
\citep[][\S6.11]{Gill-GFD}. Taking $H_1 \approx 2 \times 10^7$\,m (i.e.\ $0.03
R_\odot$, where $R_\odot$ is the solar radius) and $N \approx 8 \times 10^{-4}
\, {\rm s}^{-1}$, which are bulk values that might describe a mode spanning the
entire tachocline, gives a gravity wave speed $N H_1 / \pi = \sqrt{gH_0} \approx
5000 \, {\rm m \, s^{-1}}$, corresponding to an equivalent depth $H_0 \approx
50$\,km (taking $g \approx 540 \, {\rm m \, s^{-2}}$). Again taking $U_0 \approx
500 \,{\rm m\, s^{-1}}$, we thus estimate $F \approx 0.1$, although it is clear
that $F$ would be somewhat smaller or larger if one considered motions towards
the top of the radiative zone (with stronger stratification) or towards the base
of the convection zone (with weaker stratification).
\subsection{The linear instability problem}
Above a topography of the form $H=H(y)$, we consider a basic state $h=0$,
$\boldsymbol{u}=U(y)\boldsymbol{e}_{x}$ and ${\boldsymbol{B}}=B(y)\boldsymbol{e}_{x}$, so that the magnetic field is initially
aligned with the flow. We then consider perturbations in $h$, $\boldsymbol{u}=(u,v)$ and
${\boldsymbol{B}}=(b_x,b_y)$ to this state of the form
\begin{equation}\label{ch3:expform}
\xi(x,y,t)=\Real\{\hat{\xi}(y)\exp \left({\rm i}\alpha(x-ct)\right) \},
\end{equation}
where $\alpha$ is the (real) wavenumber and $c$ is the (complex) phase speed.
Dropping the hatted notation, the linear evolution is described by
\begin{subequations}\label{ch3:linear-equ1}
\begin{align}
\left(\frac{\partial}{\partial{t}}+U\frac{\partial}{\partial{x}}\right)u + U' v
& = -\frac{\partial{}h}{\partial{x}}
+ M^2 \left(B\frac{\partial{}b_{x}}{\partial{x}} + B' b_{y} \right),
\label{ch3:linear-equ1a} \\
\left(\frac{\partial}{\partial{t}}+U\frac{\partial}{\partial{x}}\right)v
& = -\frac{\partial{h}}{\partial{y}} + M^2 B \frac{\partial{}b_{y}}{\partial{x}},
\label{ch3:linear-equ1b} \\
\left(\frac{\partial}{\partial{t}}+U\frac{\partial}{\partial{x}}\right)b_{x}+B'v
& = B\frac{\partial{u}}{\partial{x}} + U'b_{y} ,
\label{ch3:linear-equ1c} \\
\left(\frac{\partial}{\partial{t}}+U\frac{\partial}{\partial{x}}\right)b_{y}
& = B\frac{\partial{v}}{\partial{x}},
\label{ch3:linear-equ1d} \\
F^2 \left(\frac{\partial}{\partial{t}}+U\frac{\partial}{\partial{x}}\right)h+
H\left(\frac{\partial{u}}{\partial{x}}+\frac{\partial{v}}{\partial{y}}\right)+H'v & =0,
\label{ch3:linear-equ1e}
\end{align}
\end{subequations}
where a prime denotes differentiation. Eliminating for $v$, we obtain
\begin{equation}\label{ch3:SWMHDv}
\left(\frac{S^{2}(Hv)'}{H(U-c)^{2}K^{2}}\right)'
-\left(\frac{\alpha^{2}S^{2}}{H(U-c)^{2}} -
\frac{U'}{H(U-c)}\left(\frac{S^{2}}{(U-c)^{2}K^{2}}\right)'
+\frac{Q'S^{2}}{(U-c)^{3}K^{2}}\right)Hv=0,
\end{equation}
where $Q=-U'/H$ is the background potential vorticity, and
\begin{equation}
S^{2}(y) = (U(y)-c)^{2} - M^2 B^{2}(y),\qquad K^{2}(y) = 1-F^{2}S^{2}(y).
\end{equation}
Following \cite{Howard61}, under the transformation $Hv=(U-c)G$,
equation~\eqref{ch3:SWMHDv} becomes
\begin{equation}\label{ch3:SWMHD5}
\left(\frac{S^{2}}{K^{2}}\frac{G'}{H}\right)'- \frac{\alpha^{2}S^{2}}{H} G=0.
\end{equation}
We shall use this more compact form for the remainder of this study. In the
non-magnetic shallow-water limit ($M=0$), \eqref{ch3:SWMHDv} reduces to
equation~(3.4) of \cite{Balmforth99}. In the two-dimensional incompressible
magnetohydrodynamic limit ($F=0$ and $H=1$), \eqref{ch3:SWMHD5} reduces to
equation~(3.5) of \cite{HughesTobias01}.
We shall consider (\ref{ch3:SWMHD5}) in either an unbounded domain, for which
$|G| \rightarrow 0$ as $|y| \rightarrow \infty$, or in a bounded domain with
rigid side walls, where $G=0$ and hence $b_y=0$ via (\ref{ch3:linear-equ1d}).
Either way, for given real $\alpha$, (\ref{ch3:SWMHD5}) is then an eigenvalue
problem for the unknown phase speed $c=c_r+{\rm i} c_i$. We will focus on
instabilities, i.e.\ $c_i \neq 0$, in which case (\ref{ch3:SWMHD5}) has no
singularities for real values of $y$. Since the transformation $\alpha
\rightarrow -\alpha$ leaves (\ref{ch3:SWMHD5}) unchanged, we may take $\alpha
\geq 0$ without loss of generality. Instability then occurs if $c_i > 0$, with
growth rate $\alpha c_i$.
\section{General theorems}
In this section we derive three results that hold for general shear flows
$U(y)$: two provide bounds on the growth rate of any instability, whereas the
third concerns implications of the parity of the basic state flow.
\subsection{Growth rate bound}
A bound on the instability growth rate may be obtained by calculating the rate
of change of the total disturbance energy using the combination
\begin{equation*}
Hu^{*} \times \eqref{ch3:linear-equ1a}
+ Hv^{*} \times \eqref{ch3:linear-equ1b}
+ (M^2 Hb_x^{*}) \times \eqref{ch3:linear-equ1c}
+ (M^2 H b_y^{*})\times\eqref{ch3:linear-equ1d}
+ h \times \eqref{ch3:linear-equ1e},
\end{equation*}
where $^{*}$ denotes complex conjugate. On adopting the form \eqref{ch3:expform}
for the perturbations, the real part of this expression gives (on dropping hats)
\begin{equation}\label{ch3:hoiland1}
\begin{aligned}
&\alpha{}c_{i} \left( H \left(|u|^2 +|v|^2 +M^2 |b_x|^2 +M^2 |b_y|^2 \right)
+F^2 |h|^2 \right) = \\
&-\Real\left( HU' \left(vu^{*} - M^2 b_x^{*} b_y \right)
+ M^2 H B' \left( v b_x^{*} - u^{*} b_y \right) \right) -
\Real\frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d}y}(Hvh^{*}).
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
On integrating over the $y$ domain, employing the boundary condition on $v$, and
manipulating the remaining terms on the right hand side using
$\pm2\Real(pq^{*})\leq|p|^{2}+|q|^2$, we obtain the following bound on the
growth rate:
\begin{equation}\label{thm:hoiland}
\alpha{}c_{i}\leq\frac{1}{2}(\max|U'| + M \max|B'|).
\end{equation}
In the absence of magnetic field, this reduces to the well-known bound in
hydrodynamics \citep{Hoiland53,Howard61}.
\subsection{Semi-circle theorems}
In a classic paper, \cite{Howard61} proved that for incompressible hydrodynamic
parallel shear flows, the wave speed $c$ of any unstable mode must lie within a
semi-circle in the complex plane determined by properties of the basic state
flow. Subsequently, semi-circle theorems have been derived for several other
hydrodynamical and hydromagnetic systems \citep[e.g.,][]{CollingsGrimshaw80,
HayashiYoung87, ShivamoggiDebnath87, HughesTobias01}. In a similar manner, a
semi-circle theorem may be derived for the SWMHD system.
Multiplying equation~\eqref{ch3:SWMHD5} by $G^{*}$, integrating over $y$ and
using the boundary condition on $v$ (and hence $G$) gives the relation
\begin{equation}\label{ch3:SST1}
\int \frac{S^2}{K^2} \frac{|G'|^2}{H} \, \mathrm{d}y
+ \alpha^2 \int \frac{S^2 |G|^2}{H} \, \mathrm{d}y = 0.
\end{equation}
The imaginary part of \eqref{ch3:SST1} gives
\begin{equation}\label{ch3:SWMHD6}
c_{i}\int\ (U-c_{r})\chi \, \mathrm{d}y = 0,\qquad\textnormal{where}
\qquad\chi=\frac{|G'|^{2}}{H|K|^{4}}+\alpha^{2} \frac{|G|^{2}}{H}\geq0.
\end{equation}
Equation~\eqref{ch3:SWMHD6} immediately yields Rayleigh's result that for
unstable modes ($c_i >0$), $c_r$ lies in the range of $U$ (i.e.\
$U_{\textnormal{min}} \leq {c_r} \leq U_{\textnormal{max}}$, where the
subscripts `min' and `max' refer to the minimum and maximum values across the
domain).
On using equation~\eqref{ch3:SWMHD6}, the real part of \eqref{ch3:SST1} gives
\begin{equation}\label{ch3:SWMHD7}
(c_{r}^{2}+c_{i}^{2})\int\chi \, \mathrm{d}y
= \int\chi\left(U^{2} - M^{2} B^{2}\right) \, \mathrm{d}y
-F^{2}\int\frac{|S|^{4}}{H|K|^{4}}|G'|^{2} \, \mathrm{d}y,
\end{equation}
which implies that
\begin{equation}\label{ch3:SWMHD8}
0\leq(c_{r}^{2}+c_{i}^{2}) \int\chi \, \mathrm{d}y \leq
\left(U^{2} - M^{2}B^{2}\right)_{\textnormal{max}}
\int\chi \, \mathrm{d}y.
\end{equation}
This gives the first semi-circle bound: the complex wave speed $c$ of an
unstable eigenfunction must lie within the region defined by
\begin{equation}\label{thm:semicircle1}
c_r^2 + c_i^2 \leq\left(U^{2} - M^{2} B^{2}\right)_{\textnormal{max}}.
\end{equation}
The second semi-circle bound is obtained, in the standard manner, from the
inequality $0 \geq \int(U - U_{\textnormal{max}})(U - U_{\textnormal{min}}) \chi
\, \mathrm{d}y$. Substituting from \eqref{ch3:SWMHD6} and deriving an
inequality from \eqref{ch3:SWMHD7} leads to the expression
\begin{equation}\label{ch3:SWMHD10}
0\geq \left( c_r^2 + c_i^2 - (U_{\textnormal{min}}+U_{\textnormal{max}})c_r
+ U_{\textnormal{min}}U_{\textnormal{max}}
+ M^2 (B^2)_{\textnormal{min}}\right) \int\chi\, \mathrm{d}y,
\end{equation}
which gives the second semi-circle bound: the speed $c$ of an unstable
eigenfunction must lie within the region defined by
\begin{equation}\label{thm:semicircle2}
\left( c_{r} - \frac{U_{\textnormal{min}}
+ U_{\textnormal{max}}}{2} \right)^{2} +
c_i^2 \leq\left( \frac{U_{\textnormal{max}}
- U_{\textnormal{min}}}{2} \right)^2
- M^2 (B^2)_{\textnormal{min}}.
\end{equation}
Thus, taking these results together, the eigenvalue $c$ of an unstable mode must
lie within the intersection of the two semi-circles defined by
\eqref{thm:semicircle1} and \eqref{thm:semicircle2}. In the absence of magnetic
field, semi-circle~\eqref{thm:semicircle2} lies wholly within semi-circle
\eqref{thm:semicircle1}, and we recover the well-known result of
\cite{Howard61}. However, as observed by \cite{HughesTobias01}, who considered
the stability of aligned fields and flows in incompressible MHD, for non-zero
magnetic field there is the possibility of the two semi-circles overlapping,
being disjoint, or indeed ceasing to exist; thus, in addition to giving
eigenvalue bounds for unstable modes, these results also provide sufficient
conditions for stability. From \eqref{thm:semicircle1} and
\eqref{thm:semicircle2} it therefore follows that the basic state is linearly
stable if any one of the following three conditions is satisfied:
\begin{equation}\label{thm:lin-stable1}
M|B|\geq|U|\qquad {\textnormal{everywhere in the domain}};
\end{equation}
\begin{equation}\label{thm:lin-stable2}
M|B|_{\textnormal{min}}\geq
\frac{|U_{\textnormal{max}}-U_{\textnormal{min}}|}{2};
\end{equation}
\begin{equation}\label{thm:lin-stable3}
\frac{U_{\textnormal{max}}+U_{\textnormal{min}}}{2} -
\sqrt{\left(\frac{U_{\textnormal{max}}-U_{\textnormal{min}}}{2}\right)^{2}
+ M^2 (B^2)_{\textnormal{min}}} \geq
\sqrt{\left(U^{2} - M^{2} B^{2}\right)_{\textnormal{max}}}.
\end{equation}
These results are equivalent to those given by \cite{HughesTobias01} for
incompressible MHD.
A drawback of the above approach is that the bounds do not contain the Froude
number $F$. Although it is possible to introduce $F$ into the semi-circle bounds
using similar manipulations to that employed by \cite{Pedlosky64a}, as shown by
\citet{Mak-thesis} this does not sharpen the bound and we thus omit it.
\subsection{Consequences of basic state parity}\label{parity}
For the hydrodynamic case, it can be shown that symmetries of the basic state
lead to symmetries in the stability problem \citep{Howard63}. These results may
be generalised to SWMHD if we make the further assumptions that $B^{2}(y)$ and
$H(y)$ are even functions about $y=0$.
We first consider the case when $U(y)$ is odd about $y=0$.
Equation~\eqref{ch3:SWMHD5} is unchanged under $c\rightarrow -c$ and $G(y)
\rightarrow G(-y)$. Since the equation is also unchanged under $c\rightarrow
c^*$ and $G \rightarrow G^*$, it follows that an eigenfunction with
eigenvalue $c= c_r + c_i$ must be accompanied by eigenfunctions with $c=\pm
c_{r} \pm {\rm i} c_{i}$. Thus unstable solutions either have $c_r=0$ or are a pair
of counter-propagating waves with the same phase speed. As argued by
\cite{Howard63}, the symmetry in the basic state implies that there is no
preferred direction for wave propagation, consistent with the form of the
eigenvalues.
Now consider the case when $U(y)$ is even about $y=0$. Then
\begin{equation}
G_{e} (y) = \frac{1}{2} \left( G(y)+G(-y) \right)
\qquad \textnormal{and} \qquad
G_{o} (y) = \frac{1}{2} \left( G(y)-G(-y) \right)
\end{equation}
are also eigenfunctions of \eqref{ch3:SWMHD5}. Following \cite{DrazinHoward66},
if we now take $G_{o}$ multiplied by \eqref{ch3:SWMHD5} with $G=G_{e}$ and
subtract this from $G_{e}$ multiplied by \eqref{ch3:SWMHD5} with $G=G_{o}$,
integrating over $-L_y \le y \le L_y$ gives
\begin{equation}
W(G_e, G_o) \equiv [G_{e}'G_{o}-G_{o}'G_{e}]^{+L_{y}}_{-L_{y}} =
\textrm{constant} = 0,
\end{equation}
owing to the imposed boundary conditions on the eigenfunction. The vanishing of
the Wronskian $W$ implies that the functions $G_e$ and $G_o$ are linearly
dependent throughout the domain, which is possible only if one of them is
identically zero. Thus an unstable eigenfunction corresponding to a particular
eigenvalue is either an even or odd function about $y=0$.
\section{Piecewise-constant profiles: vortex sheet and rectangular jet}
\label{sec4}
We now consider some simple flow configurations for which the eigenvalue problem
\eqref{ch3:SWMHD5} can be reduced to an algebraic equation for $c$, from which
the conditions for stability can be readily determined. To do this, we take
$H=1$ (no topography) and $B=1$ (a uniform magnetic field). We seek solutions of
\eqref{ch3:SWMHD5} in an unbounded domain, with
\begin{equation}\label{ch4:bcs}
|G| \rightarrow 0 \quad \textnormal{as} \quad |y| \rightarrow \infty.
\end{equation}
We consider velocity profiles $U(y)$ that are piecewise constant. If $U(y)$ is
discontinuous at $y=y_0$, then the eigenfunction $G$ must satisfy two jump
conditions at $y=y_0$. In the usual way, the (linearised) kinematic boundary
condition implies
\begin{subequations}
\begin{equation}\label{ch4:match1}
\left[\frac{v}{U-c}\right]^{y_{0}^{+}}_{y_{0}^{-}} =
\left [ G \right]^{y_{0}^{+}}_{y_{0}^{-}}=0.
\end{equation}
The pressure (or free surface displacement) is also continuous at $y=y_0$. The
corresponding condition on $G$ is most easily derived by integrating
\eqref{ch3:SWMHD5} across $y=y_0$, yielding
\begin{equation}\label{ch4:match2}
\left[\frac{S^2}{K^2}G'\right]^{y_{0}^{+}}_{y_{0}^{-}}=0.
\end{equation}
\end{subequations}
\subsection{Vortex sheet}\label{sec4_vs}
We first consider the velocity profile
\begin{equation*}
U(y)=\begin{cases}+1, &y>0,\\-1, &y<0.\end{cases}
\end{equation*}
Then, for $y\neq0$, \eqref{ch3:SWMHD5} becomes $G''-\alpha^2 K^2 G = 0$. Using
\eqref{ch4:bcs} and \eqref{ch4:match1}, we thus find
\begin{equation}\label{ch4:vortex2}
G(y)=\begin{cases} \exp \left( -\alpha{}K_{+}y \right), &y>0,\\
\exp \left( +\alpha{}K_{-}y \right), &y<0,
\end{cases}
\end{equation}
where
\begin{equation}\label{ch4:Kpm}
K_{\pm}= \sqrt{ 1-F^2 \left( (1\mp{}c)^2-M^2 \right) },
\qquad \Real\left( K_{\pm} \right) > 0.
\end{equation}
The second jump condition \eqref{ch4:match2} then implies an eigenvalue relation
for $c$:
\begin{equation}\label{ch4:vortex4}
\frac{(1-c)^2-M^2}{K_{+}} + \frac{(1+c)^2-M^2}{K_{-}} = 0.
\end{equation}
Note that $c$ is independent of the wavenumber $\alpha$, so any unstable mode
with $c_{i}>0$ has an unbounded growth rate as $\alpha \rightarrow \infty$. This
is an artefact of considering ideal fluids; viscosity will preferentially
suppress small scales and remove this unphysical behaviour.
There are several special cases. When $F=M=0$, we recover the classical
Kelvin--Helmholtz instability with $c=\pm{\rm i}$. When $F=0$ but $M \neq 0$,
\eqref{ch4:vortex4} reduces to the incompressible MHD case of \cite{Michael55},
with $c^2=-(1-M^2)$; thus, the Kelvin--Helmholtz instability is stabilised when
$M \ge 1$, since the disturbance has to do work to bend the field lines. When
$M=0$ but $F \neq 0$, \eqref{ch4:vortex4} gives the classical hydrodynamic
shallow-water dispersion relation, which is analogous to that of two-dimensional
compressible hydrodynamics. The Kelvin--Helmholtz instability is stabilised when
$F\geq\sqrt{2}$ \citep{Miles58,BazdenkovPogutse83}, since the disturbance has to
do work to move the free surface against gravity. Thus, increasing $F$ or $M$ in
the absence of the other is stabilising.
In the general case where $F$ and $M$ are both non-zero, \eqref{ch4:vortex4} can
be rearranged and squared to yield a quartic equation for $c$:
\begin{equation}\label{ch4:vortex5}
F^2 c^4 - 2 \left( 1 + F^2 \left( M^2+1 \right) \right) c^2
+\left( M^2-1 \right) \left( 2 + F^2 \left( M^2-1 \right) \right) = 0.
\end{equation}
Here we have ignored the degenerate case with $c=0$, which is a solution of
\eqref{ch4:vortex4} when $M=1$. By comparing solutions of \eqref{ch4:vortex5}
with those of \eqref{ch4:vortex4} found using a Newton iteration method, we find
that only two roots of \eqref{ch4:vortex5} also satisfy \eqref{ch4:vortex4}:
these are $c=\pm c_{\rm v}$, where
\begin{equation}\label{ch4:vortex7}
c_{\rm v}={\rm i}\left( \frac{\sqrt{1+4F^2+4F^4M^2}
- (1+F^2+F^2M^2)}{F^2}\right)^{1/2}.
\end{equation}
A contour plot of $\Imag(c_{\rm v})$ is shown in
figure~\ref{fig:vortex_contour_FM}. From \eqref{ch4:vortex7}, there is
instability only if
\begin{equation}\label{ch4:vortex8}
M<1 \qquad\textnormal{and}\qquad F<\sqrt{\frac{2}{1-M^2}}.
\end{equation}
Although increasing $F$ is always stabilising at fixed $M$, the critical value
of $F$ above which the flow is stable increases as $M$ increases towards $1$.
Thus, although magnetic field and free-surface effects are stabilising in
isolation, together they can lead to instabilities at arbitrarily large values
of $F$, provided
\begin{equation}\label{e:tongue}
1 - \frac{2}{F^2} < M^2 < 1.
\end{equation}
\begin{figure}
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{figure1}
\caption{Contours of $\Imag(c_{\rm v})$, given by expression
\eqref{ch4:vortex7}, with stability boundaries \eqref{ch4:vortex8} in red.}
\label{fig:vortex_contour_FM}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
Using an asymptotic analysis, it is possible to investigate these instabilities
further at large $F$ and with $M$ just smaller than unity. Rewriting
\eqref{ch4:vortex7} in terms of $1-M^2$ and expanding for $|1-M^2| \ll 1$, we
obtain
\begin{equation}
c_{\rm v} \sim {\rm i} \left( \frac{1-M^2}{1+2F^2}
- \frac{2 F^6 (1-M^2)^2}{(1+2F^2)^3}\right)^{1/2}, \qquad |1-M^2| \ll 1,
\label{e:newcv}
\end{equation}
where terms of $O \left( (1-M^2)^3 \right)$ have been neglected. When $F=O(1)$,
the first term on the right-hand side of \eqref{e:newcv} dominates. However, in
the regime of interest \eqref{e:tongue} with $F^2 \sim (1-M^2)^{-1} \gg 1$, the
two terms on the right-hand side of \eqref{e:newcv} have the same order of
magnitude, and instead we obtain
\begin{equation}\label{ch4:vortex_asymp3}
c_{\rm v}\sim{}{\rm i}\left( \frac{1-M^2}{2F^2}-\frac{(1-M^2)^2}{4} \right)^{1/2}
\quad\textnormal{as}\quad F^{-2}\sim(1-M^2)\rightarrow0.
\end{equation}
This simple formula is consistent with both stability boundaries in
\eqref{ch4:vortex8}, and, as shown in figure~\ref{fig:vortex_asymp}, closely
predicts $c_i$ in this weak instability regime, even when $F$ is of order unity.
Using \eqref{ch4:vortex_asymp3}, it is straightforward to show that
$\Imag(c_{\rm v})$ is maximised when $M^2 = 1 - 1/F^2$, with $c_{\rm v} \sim {\rm i}
/ (2F^2)$, so that the growth rate of the most unstable mode decays like
$F^{-2}$ in this regime.
\begin{figure}
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{figure2}
\caption{The weak instability regime of the vortex sheet for ($a$) $F=2$,
($b$) $F=5$, as determined directly from \eqref{ch4:vortex7} (crosses) and
from the asymptotic result \eqref{ch4:vortex_asymp3} (line).}
\label{fig:vortex_asymp}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
\subsection{Rectangular jet}
We now consider the top-hat velocity profile
\begin{equation}\label{ch4:jet1}
U(y)=\begin{cases}
1, \ &|y|<1,\\
0, \ &|y|>1.
\end{cases}
\end{equation}
Then, \eqref{ch3:SWMHD5} and \eqref{ch4:bcs} imply
\begin{equation}\label{ch4:jet2}
G=\left\{ \begin{array}{cc}
A_{+}\exp \left( -\alpha{K_{0}}(y-1) \right), & \; \; y>+1,\\
A_{e} \cosh(\alpha{K_{1}}y) +
A_{o} \sinh(\alpha{K_{1}} y), & |y|<1,\\
A_{-}\exp \left( +\alpha{K_{0}}(y+1) \right), & \; \; y<-1,
\end{array} \right.
\end{equation}
for some $A_{+}$, $A_{-}$, $A_{e}$ and $A_{o}$, where
\begin{subequations} \label{K0K1} \begin{align}
K_{0} & =\sqrt{ 1-F^2(c^2-M^2) }, \quad \textnormal{with} \; \;
\Real(K_0)>0 \; \; \mbox{for bounded solutions},\\
K_{1} & =\sqrt{1-F^2 \left( (1-c)^2-M^2 \right) }, \quad \mbox{with} \; \;
-\frac{\pi}{2} < \arg \left( K_1 \right) \le \frac{\pi}{2}.
\end{align}\end{subequations}
Here we follow Rayleigh's formulation \citep{DrazinReid-Stability} and consider
eigenfunctions that are either even or odd. For the even mode, we set $A_{o}=0$,
$A_+ = A_-$ and write $c=c_e$. Then (\ref{ch4:match1},$b$) and \eqref{ch4:jet2}
give
\begin{equation}\label{ch4:jet_even_master}
\frac{c_e^2-M^2}{K_0} + \frac{(1-c_e)^2-M^2}{K_{1}}\tanh(\alpha K_{1} ) = 0.
\end{equation}
For the odd mode, we set $A_{e}=0$, $A_+ = -A_-$ and write $c=c_o$. Then
(\ref{ch4:match1},$b$) and \eqref{ch4:jet2} give
\begin{equation}\label{ch4:jet_odd_master}
\frac{c_o^2-M^2}{K_0} + \frac{(1-c_o)^2-M^2}{K_{1}}\coth(\alpha{}K_{1} ) = 0.
\end{equation}
In contrast to the vortex sheet dispersion relation \eqref{ch4:vortex4}, here
$c$ depends upon $\alpha$.
Two special cases may be solved analytically. When $F=M=0$, so that $K_{0,1}=1$,
expressions~\eqref{ch4:jet_even_master} and \eqref{ch4:jet_odd_master} yield
unstable modes with
\begin{equation}
c_{e} =\frac{T + {\rm i} \sqrt{T}}{1+T}, \qquad
c_{o} =\frac{1 + {\rm i} \sqrt{T}}{1+T}, \qquad
\mbox{where} \; \; T=\tanh \alpha,
\label{e:FM00}
\end{equation}
so that the flow is unstable for all $\alpha$, with $\Imag(c)$ approaching a
maximum value of $1/2$ as $\alpha \rightarrow \infty$ \citep{Rayleigh78}. When
$F=0$ but $M \neq 0$, so that $K_{0,1}=1$ again, \eqref{ch4:jet_even_master} and
\eqref{ch4:jet_odd_master} yield
\begin{equation}\label{ch4:jet_F0_result}
c_e=c_{e}^{(0)}=\frac{T + {\rm i} \sqrt{T-M^2(1+T)^2}}{1+T}, \qquad
c_o=c_{o}^{(0)}=\frac{1 + {\rm i} \sqrt{T-M^2(1+T)^2}}{1+T}.
\end{equation}
(\citet{Gedzelman73} gave formulae for these two cases (his (3.4) and (3.5)),
but both are missing factors of $2$.) Both modes are stable for all $\alpha$
when $M \geq 1/2$; otherwise, both modes are unstable (with the same growth rate)
provided that
\begin{equation}
M < M_c^{(0)} = \frac{\sqrt{T}}{1+T} \; \Leftrightarrow \;
\alpha > \alpha_c^{(0)}
= \tanh^{-1} \left( \frac{1-2M^2-\sqrt{1-4M^2}}{2M^2} \right).
\label{e:Mc0alphac0}
\end{equation}
Thus, the magnetic field introduces a long-wave cutoff.
The other special case with $M=0$ but $F \neq 0$ cannot be solved analytically.
Then, \eqref{ch4:jet_even_master} and \eqref{ch4:jet_odd_master} are equivalent
to expressions given by \cite{Gill65}, who considered corresponding
instabilities for two-dimensional compressible hydrodynamics. An important
property is that, at fixed $\alpha$ and $F$, there can be a large number of
unstable modes for sufficiently large $F$, which are often interpreted in terms
of over-reflection \citep{TakehiroHayashi92}. This is in contrast to
the behaviour at $F=0$, where just two modes exist (one even and one odd), as
described by \eqref{e:FM00}.
We generalise these results to cases with $F \neq 0$ and $M \neq 0$ by solving
\eqref{ch4:jet_even_master} and \eqref{ch4:jet_odd_master} numerically using a
Newton iteration. We start by limiting attention to the smooth extensions of the
unstable even and odd modes \eqref{e:FM00} that exist at $F=0$ and $M=0$, and
then tracking these modes over ($M,F$) space; the existence of other unstable
modes at high $F$ is discussed in \S\ref{s:highmodes}. Contours of $\Imag (c)$
obtained using this tracking approach are shown in
figure~\ref{fig:jet_contour_FM}, for a wide range of $F$, $M$ and $\alpha$. We
note that (i) neither mode is unstable for $M>1/2$; (ii) for small $\alpha$, the
even mode is stabilised at values of $M$ considerably less than $1/2$; (iii) for
small $\alpha$ and small $F$, the odd mode is stabilised at values of $M$
considerably less than $1/2$; (iv) both modes remain unstable for large $F$; (v)
when both modes are unstable, the even mode is generally more unstable than the
odd mode; (vi) at large $\alpha$, the even and odd modes lead to instabilities
of comparable strength, which mimic that of the vortex sheet (cf.
figure~\ref{fig:vortex_contour_FM}). We now use asymptotic analyses to describe
this behaviour in more detail.
\begin{figure}
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{figure3}
\caption{Instability of the rectangular jet. Smooth extensions at fixed
$\alpha$ from $(M,F)=(0,0)$ of the unstable modes \eqref{e:FM00}, computed
numerically using \eqref{ch4:jet_even_master} and
\eqref{ch4:jet_odd_master}. Note the different choice of $F$-axis used in
the top panels. Left: contours of $\Imag(c)$ for the even mode. Centre:
contours of $\Imag(c)$ for the odd mode. The black contours are in intervals
of $0.025$ from $0.025$ to $0.5$; weak instabilities are shown by the grey
contours at $0$, $0.001$, $0.005$ and $0.01$. The $\alpha \gg 1$ stability
boundaries \eqref{eq:conditions} are shown as dashed lines in
panels ($a,b$). The $\alpha \ll 1$ stability boundaries
\eqref{e:even_mode_cutoff2} and \eqref{e:odd_mode_cutoff} are shown as
dashed lines in panels ($g,j$) and ($h,k$) respectively. Right: regime diagrams
deduced from the left and centre panels, comparing the growth rate of the
even mode ($E$) with that of the odd mode ($O$). No regions were found with
$E > O = 0$. }
\label{fig:jet_contour_FM}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
\subsubsection{Instability at large $\alpha$}\label{sec:large_alpha}
When $M$ and $F$ are of order unity, $\tanh(\alpha{}K_{1}) \approx 1$ when
$\alpha \gg 1$ (provided $\alpha \Real(K_1) \gg 1$), so that both
\eqref{ch4:jet_even_master} and \eqref{ch4:jet_odd_master} may be approximated
by
\begin{equation}\label{ch4:big_alpha_asymp1}
\frac{ (\tilde c+1/2)^2-M^2 }{\sqrt{1-F^2((\tilde c+1/2)^2-M^2)}}
+ \frac{(\tilde c-1/2)^2-M^2}{\sqrt{1-F^2\left( (\tilde c-1/2)^2-M^2 \right) }}
= 0,
\end{equation}
where $\tilde c = c_e - 1/2$ or $\tilde c = c_o-1/2$. This dispersion relation
is similar in form to that for the vortex sheet \eqref{ch4:vortex4}, and a
solution may be found in the same way:
\begin{equation}\label{ch4:big_alpha_asymp2}
\tilde{c} ={\rm i}\left( \frac{\sqrt{1+F^2+F^4M^2 } -
(1+F^2/4+F^2M^2)}{F^2} \right)^{1/2}.
\end{equation}
Physically, a sufficiently localised short-wave disturbance sees only one flank
of the jet, and thus a vortex sheet instability is obtained to a first
approximation. From \eqref{ch4:big_alpha_asymp2}, there is instability only when
\begin{equation}\label{eq:conditions}
M<\frac{1}{2}\qquad\textnormal{and}\qquad F<\sqrt{\frac{8}{1-4M^2}}.
\end{equation}
As shown by the dashed lines in figures~\ref{fig:jet_contour_FM}$a,b$, the
conditions~\eqref{eq:conditions} approximately bound the region of strong
instabilities in ($M,F$) space, even when $\alpha = 10$. However, it is also
clear that there are additional weak instabilities (shown as grey contours) even
when $F > \sqrt{8/(1-4M^2)}$; the nature of these modes will be discussed in
\S\ref{s:highmodes}. In contrast, the $M=1/2$ cutoff is robust. Indeed, as is
evident from figures~\ref{fig:jet_contour_FM}$d,e$, the magnetic field cutoff
stays close to $M=1/2$ (for all $F$) even when $\alpha \approx 1$. For example,
at $\alpha=0.8$ and $F=0$, the cutoff $M_c \approx 0.490$, using
\eqref{e:Mc0alphac0}.
\subsubsection{Instability at small $\alpha$}
We consider first the even mode. Assuming that $K_1$ remains bounded (which may
be confirmed \textit{a posteriori}), $\tanh(\alpha{}K_{1})\approx\alpha{}K_{1}$
when $\alpha \ll 1$, so that \eqref{ch4:jet_even_master} becomes
\begin{equation}\label{ch4:jet_even_asymp_master}
\frac{c_e^2-M^2}{\sqrt{1-F^2(c_e^2-M^2)}}
+ \alpha \left( (1-c_e)^2-M^2 \right) = 0.
\end{equation}
Suppose that $F^2=O(1)$. If $M=O(1)$, then $c_e=\pm{}M$ at leading order, and
the next correction in $\alpha$ is also real: no instabilities are predicted,
consistent with figure~\ref{fig:jet_contour_FM}$j$. However, if $M^2 \sim
\alpha \ll 1$, then at leading order, \eqref{ch4:jet_even_asymp_master} gives
\begin{equation}\label{ch4:jet_even_asymp2}
c_e \sim \pm {\rm i}\sqrt{\alpha-M^2}\qquad\textnormal{as}\qquad
M^2\sim\alpha\rightarrow0,\quad F^2=O(1),
\end{equation}
which is consistent with the small $M$ and $\alpha$ limits of
\eqref{ch4:jet_F0_result}. Thus a weak magnetic field reduces the strength of
the hydrodynamic instability and eventually suppresses it, with instability when
\begin{equation}\label{e:even_mode_cutoff1}
M < M_c = \alpha^{1/2},\; \mbox{or equivalently when} \;
\alpha > \alpha_c = M^2.
\end{equation}
A dependence on $F$ appears only at the next order in $\alpha$, which is why the
cutoff in figure~\ref{fig:jet_contour_FM}$j$ is approximately independent of
$F$.
To capture the destabilising influence of $F$ apparent in
figure~\ref{fig:jet_contour_FM}$g$, the analysis may be extended to larger
values of $F$ with $F^2 \sim \alpha^{-1} \gg 1$. In this case, the square root
in \eqref{ch4:jet_even_asymp_master} also enters the balance at leading order,
and we obtain
\begin{equation}\label{ch4:jet_even_asymp3}
c_e \sim{\rm i}\left( \frac{\alpha^2F^2}{2}-M^2
+ \sqrt{\frac{\alpha^4F^4}{4}+\alpha^2}\right)^{1/2}
\qquad\textnormal{as}\qquad M^2\sim{}F^{-2}\sim\alpha\rightarrow 0,
\end{equation}
which formally reduces to \eqref{ch4:jet_even_asymp2} when $F$ is of order
unity. Again there is a long-wave cutoff due to the magnetic field, with
instability only when
\begin{equation}
M < M_c = \frac{ \alpha^2 F^2 + \sqrt{4 \alpha^2 + \alpha^4 F^4} }{2}
\; \; \Leftrightarrow \; \;
\alpha > \alpha_c= \frac{M^2}{\sqrt{1+M^2 F^2}}.
\label{e:even_mode_cutoff2}
\end{equation}
This cutoff, which is shown as a dashed contour in
figures~\ref{fig:jet_contour_FM}$g,j$, captures the destabilising influence of
$F$. Indeed, in contrast to the result \eqref{eq:conditions} for $\alpha \gg 1$,
equation \eqref{ch4:jet_even_asymp3} does not predict stabilisation at large $F$
when $\alpha \ll 1$, consistent with the results shown in
figures~\ref{fig:jet_contour_FM}$g,j$. The accuracy of this dispersion
relation and cutoff when $\alpha \ll 1$ can be seen in
figure~\ref{fig:jet_alpha}.
In the same $\alpha \ll 1$ limit, the dispersion relation
\eqref{ch4:jet_odd_master} for the odd mode reduces to
\begin{equation}\label{ch4:jet_odd_asymp_master}
\frac{\alpha(c_o^2-M^2)}{\sqrt{1-F^2(c_o^2-M^2)}}
+ \frac{(1-c_o)^2-M^2}{1-F^2 \left( (1-c_o)^2-M^2 \right) }=0.
\end{equation}
Suppose that $F^2=O(1)$. If $M=O(1)$, then $c_o$ is real at the first two orders
in $\alpha$: no instabilities are predicted, consistent with
figure~\ref{fig:jet_contour_FM}$k$. However, if $M^2 \sim \alpha \ll 1$, then
at leading order, \eqref{ch4:jet_odd_asymp_master} gives
\begin{equation}\label{ch4:jet_odd_asymp1}
c_o \sim 1+{\rm i} \left( \frac{\alpha}{\sqrt{1-F^2}} - M^2 \right)^{1/2}
\; \textnormal{as} \; \;
M^2\sim\alpha\rightarrow0,\; F^2=O(1),
\; 1-F^2=O(1).
\end{equation}
When $F<1$, again there is a cutoff due to the magnetic field, with instability
only when
\begin{equation}
M < M_c = \frac{ \alpha^{1/2} }{ (1-F^2)^{1/4}},
\; \; \mbox{or equivalently when} \; \;
\alpha > \alpha_c = M^2 \sqrt{1-F^2}.
\label{e:odd_mode_cutoff}
\end{equation}
This cutoff, which is shown as a dashed contour in
figures~\ref{fig:jet_contour_FM}$h,k$, captures the sharp destabilising
transition as $F \rightarrow 1$, which is particularly evident in
figure~\ref{fig:jet_contour_FM}$k$. However, when $F>1$,
expression~\eqref{ch4:jet_odd_asymp1} shows that $c_o$ always has a positive
imaginary part, so that there is no cutoff at small $M$ (when $\alpha \ll 1$).
This is clear in figures~\ref{fig:jet_contour_FM}$h,k$, where there are weak
instabilities for large $F$ with $M$ close to $1/2$. The absence of a cutoff
when $F>1$ is also evident in figure~\ref{fig:jet_alpha}$b$.
When $F$ is close to $1$, the asymptotics leading to \eqref{ch4:jet_odd_asymp1}
break down, and one must instead seek solutions with $c = 1 + O(\alpha^{2/5})$.
The resulting (quintic) equation does not admit solutions in closed form
\citep{Mak-thesis}, although the special case with $F=1$ may be solved exactly,
yielding $c_o = 1+\alpha^{2/5} {\rm e}^{3 \pi {\rm i} / 5} / 2^{1/5}$. Thus $c_o$ is
independent of $M$ in this regime, consistent with the behaviour shown in the
bottom left corners of figures~\ref{fig:jet_contour_FM}$h,k$.
\begin{figure}
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{figure4}
\caption{Instability of the rectangular jet at $M=0.1$, for ($a$) $F=0.8$
and ($b$) $F=5$. Shown are the growth rates of the even and odd
modes, computed numerically from \eqref{ch4:jet_even_master} and
\eqref{ch4:jet_odd_master}, and the asymptotic predictions when $\alpha \ll
1$ for the even mode \eqref{ch4:jet_even_asymp3} and the odd mode
\eqref{ch4:jet_odd_asymp1}. In ($a$), the asymptotic prediction
\eqref{ch4:big_alpha_asymp2} for both modes when $\alpha \gg 1$ is also
plotted.}
\label{fig:jet_alpha}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
\subsubsection{Preferred mode of instability: even versus odd modes}
From figure~\ref{fig:jet_contour_FM}, it can be seen that the even mode is more
unstable than the odd mode for some parameters but not for others. When $\alpha
\gg 1$, both even and odd modes satisfy the same dispersion relation
\eqref{ch4:big_alpha_asymp1} to leading order, as seen in
figures~\ref{fig:jet_contour_FM}$a,b$; as shown in
figure~\ref{fig:jet_contour_FM}$c$, the even mode is generally more unstable
than the odd mode, although this is a weak effect. In contrast, when $\alpha \ll
1$, the odd mode is generally more unstable, as shown in
figure~\ref{fig:jet_contour_FM}$l$. In particular, when $F<1$, the odd mode is
more unstable (from \eqref{ch4:jet_even_asymp2} and \eqref{ch4:jet_odd_asymp1})
and is unstable over a larger region of parameter space (from
\eqref{e:even_mode_cutoff1} and \eqref{e:odd_mode_cutoff}). When $F>1$, again
the odd mode is unstable over a larger region of ($M,F$) space; the even mode is
stabilised according to \eqref{e:even_mode_cutoff2}, whilst the odd mode has no
cutoff at small $M$, from \eqref{e:odd_mode_cutoff}.
The nature of the transition when $\alpha$ is of order unity can be quantified
by performing a small $F$ analysis. We thus write $c=c^{(0)}+F^2c^{(1)}+O(F^4)$
and substitute into \eqref{ch4:jet_even_master} for $c_e$ and
\eqref{ch4:jet_odd_master} for $c_o$. The leading order terms $c_e^{(0)}$ and
$c_o^{(0)}$ are given by \eqref{ch4:jet_F0_result}. In the case where there is
instability at leading order, i.e.\ when \eqref{e:Mc0alphac0} is satisfied, we
then find
\begin{align}
\begin{split}
&\Imag \left( c_e^{(1)} \right) = a_e g, \; \; \;
\Imag \left( c_o^{(1)} \right) = a_o g, \; \; \;
\mbox{where} \; \; g(\alpha,M) = \frac{T^2 - 6T + 1}{(T+1)^2} + 4M^2, \\
&a_e = \frac{T+T^2 -\alpha(1-T^2)}{4 (1+T)^2 \sqrt{T-M^2(1+T)^2}}, \; \; \;
a_o = \frac{T+T^2 + \alpha T (1-T^2)}{4 (1+T)^2 \sqrt{T-M^2(1+T)^2}},
\end{split}
\end{align}
and $T=\tanh \alpha$. It is easy to see that $a_o > a_e > 0$ for all $\alpha$,
so the behaviour is determined by the sign of $g$. More precisely, the even mode
is more unstable (at small $F$) when $4M^2 < (6T-1-T^2)/(T+1)^2$. This is
impossible when $T < 3-2\sqrt{2}$, so the odd mode is more unstable at small $F$
when $\alpha < 0.1733$, for all $M$. If $T > 3-2 \sqrt{2}$, then the even mode
is more unstable at small $F$ when
\begin{equation}
M < M_c = \frac{ \sqrt{ 6T-1-T^2} }{2 (1+T) }
\; \Leftrightarrow \;
\alpha < \tanh^{-1}\left(\frac{3-4M^2 - 2\sqrt{2-4M^2}}{1+4M^2}\right).
\end{equation}
For example, when $\alpha=0.2$, the most unstable mode at small $F$ is even when
$M < 0.159$ and odd when $0.159 < M < 0.371$ (cf.
figure~\ref{fig:jet_contour_FM}$i$); when $\alpha=0.8$, the most unstable mode
is even when $M < 0.479 $ and odd when $0.479 < M < 0.490 $ (cf.
figure~\ref{fig:jet_contour_FM}$f$). As $\alpha \rightarrow \infty$, $T
\rightarrow 1$ and $M_c \rightarrow 1/2$, so there is only a vanishingly thin
region close to $M=1/2$ where the odd mode is more unstable at small $F$.
\subsubsection{Maximum growth rate}
At fixed $F$ and $M$, it is natural to try to find the most unstable wavenumber
by maximising $\alpha c_i$ with respect to $\alpha$. However, this is not
guaranteed to lead to a finite value of $\alpha$: for example, when $F=0$,
\eqref{ch4:jet_F0_result} shows that $c_i \rightarrow \sqrt{1-4M^2}/2$ as
$\alpha \rightarrow \infty$, so provided $M<1/2$ the growth rate $\alpha c_i$
increases without bound as $\alpha \rightarrow \infty$. The same phenomenon
persists for small $F$, as illustrated in figure~\ref{fig:jet_alpha}$a$ at
$M=0.1$ and $F=0.8$. However, when $F > \sqrt{8/(1-4M^2)}$ and $M<1/2$, the
asymptotic theory of \S\ref{sec:large_alpha} for $\alpha \gg 1$ predicts that
the flow is stable. In practice, we have seen in
figures~\ref{fig:jet_contour_FM}$a,b$ that there are weak instabilities for
these parameters, but the growth rates decay sufficiently rapidly with $\alpha$
that a most unstable mode typically occurs at finite $\alpha$, as illustrated in
figure~\ref{fig:jet_alpha}$b$ at $M=0.1$ and $F=5$. However, we have been unable
to find an analytical expression for the most unstable wavenumber in this
regime.
\subsubsection{Multiple modes of instability at large $F$}\label{s:highmodes}
\begin{figure}
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{figure5}
\caption{Instability of the rectangular jet at $\alpha=1$, and $M=0$ (left)
and $F=20$ (right). Shown is $c_i=\Imag(c)$ computed numerically from
\eqref{ch4:jet_even_master} and \eqref{ch4:jet_odd_master}. Even modes are
shown as solid lines, and odd modes as dashed lines. The unique even and odd
modes that smoothly connect to the modes at $(M,F)=(0,0)$ are shown as
thicker lines.}
\label{fig:gill}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
In addition to the smooth extensions of the unstable even mode and odd mode that
exist at $(M,F)=(0,0)$ (the primary modes), there exist secondary modes of
instability for sufficiently large $F$. Instabilities of this type are shown in
figure~\ref{fig:gill}. At $M=0$, the first such secondary mode, which is odd,
appears close to $F=2.3$; the next secondary mode, which is even, appears close
to $F=3.8$. For larger values of $F$, the secondary modes are more unstable than
the primary modes; this behaviour persists for $M \neq 0$, as shown in
figure~\ref{fig:gill}$b$. Although an asymptotic description of the secondary
modes is possible as $F \rightarrow \infty$, the growth rates are relatively
small, so these modes are not discussed further.
\section{Smooth profiles: hyperbolic-tangent shear layer and Bickley jet}
\label{sec:smooth_profiles}
As a model of more realistic velocity profiles, we consider in this section the
instabilities of the hyperbolic-tangent shear layer and the Bickley jet. These
may be regarded as smooth versions of the piecewise-linear profiles studied in
\S\ref{sec4}. Linear instability calculations involving these two profiles are
well documented in a wide variety of contexts \citep[e.g.,][]{Lipps62, Howard63,
Michalke64, SutherlandPeltier92, HughesTobias01} and these provide a comparison
and check on our results. We again restrict attention (for simplicity) to the
case of a uniform background magnetic field, $B(y) \equiv 1$, and with no
underlying topography.
\subsection{Numerical method}
We seek a numerical solution of the eigenvalue equation \eqref{ch3:SWMHD5},
written as
\begin{equation}\label{ch5:numerical_1}
G''+\left( \frac{(S^2)'}{S^2} - \frac{(K^2)'}{K^2} \right) G'
-\alpha^2 K^2 G=0,
\end{equation}
where, again, $S^2=(U-c)^2 - M^2$ and $K^2 = 1-F^2 S^2$. Although the velocity
profiles are defined over the entire real line, we solve \eqref{ch5:numerical_1}
on $y\in [-L, L]$, using a shooting method, with matching imposed at $y=0$,
employing a generalised Newton method as the root-finding algorithm. Since the
solutions decay exponentially as $|y|$ becomes large, namely
\begin{equation}\label{ch5:numerical_2}
G\sim\exp \left(-\alpha{}K_{\pm} y \right)
\qquad \textnormal{as} \qquad |y|\rightarrow \infty,
\end{equation}
where
\begin{equation}
K_{\pm}^2 = 1-F^2 \left( (U_{\pm} - c)^2 - M^2 \right) ,
\qquad U_{\pm} = \lim_{y\rightarrow\pm\infty} U(y),
\end{equation}
we adopt expression~\eqref{ch5:numerical_2} as the boundary condition to be
implemented at $y=\pm L$. Since our interest is in instabilities, singularities
in the governing equation are avoided. To ensure negligible influence of the
finite domain, $L$ is doubled until the computed eigenvalue changes by less than
0.5\%. The routines are written in MATLAB, using \verb|ode113| as the integrator
(an Adams-Bashforth method with adaptive grid). Although the boundary conditions
are functions of $c$, changing at every iteration, we generally have no problems
with convergence provided that the initial guess is close to the true value.
Solutions are initialised from $(M,F)=(0,0)$ at some fixed $\alpha$ using a
known numerical result documented in, for example, \cite{DrazinReid-Stability}.
Runs at new parameter values are then initialised using an estimate for $c$ from
previously calculated values at nearby parameters. The Bickley jet is even about
$y=0$ and hence the parity result of \S\ref{parity} holds --- i.e. the
eigenfunctions are either even or odd. In this case we need integrate only up to
$y=0$, with the imposition of either $G'(0)=0$ (even mode) or $G(0)=0$ (odd
mode).
\subsection{Hyperbolic-tangent shear layer}
In this subsection, we consider the basic state velocity defined by
\begin{equation}
U(y)=\tanh y.
\label{e:tanh}
\end{equation}
From inequality~\eqref{thm:hoiland} we know that the growth rates
$\alpha{}c_{i}$ are bounded above by $|U'|_{\mathrm{max}}/2=1/2$; furthermore,
from the stability criteria \eqref{thm:lin-stable1} or \eqref{thm:lin-stable2},
this profile is stable when $M\geq1$.
When $M=F=0$, instability exists only when $0 < \alpha < 1$, with a neutral mode
at $\alpha=1$ \citep[e.g.,][\S31.10]{DrazinReid-Stability}. in this case, there
is a single primary mode of instability, which may be classified as an
inflection-point instability and attributed to interacting Rossby waves
supported by the background shear \citep[see, for example, the review
by][]{Carpenter-et-al13}. For both two-dimensional compressible hydrodynamics
and shallow-water hydrodynamics, there is a secondary mode of instability, first
found by \cite{Blumen-et-al75}. This has a smaller growth rate and a less
pronounced spatial decay than the primary mode. Further, whilst the primary mode
has $c_r=0$, there are two branches for the secondary mode with equal and
opposite (non-zero) phase speeds, consistent with the parity results in
\S\ref{parity}, which ensure that $c=\pm c_r+{\rm i} c_i$ for unstable modes. The
secondary mode can be attributed to interacting gravity waves
\citep[e.g.,][]{Satomura81, HayashiYoung87, TakehiroHayashi92, Balmforth99} and,
indeed, can occur for linear shear flows, explicitly filtering out the
possibility of Rossby waves due to a background vorticity gradient. This is
consistent with the theorem of \cite{Ripa83}, which states that for instability,
either the associated potential vorticity profile possesses an inflection point
or $F>1$, both of which encourage instability through interacting waves.
Both modes have been found in our SWMHD system. Figure~\ref{fig:tanh_contour_FM}
shows contours of $c_i$ over $(M,F)$ space at selected values of $\alpha$ for
the profile (\ref{e:tanh}), distinguishing between the primary mode (with
$c_r=0$, shown as solid contours) and the secondary mode (with $c_r \neq 0$,
shown as dashed contours). In figure~\ref{fig:tanh_contour_FM}$a$, at
$\alpha=0.7$, and figure~\ref{fig:tanh_contour_FM}$b$, at $\alpha=0.44$ (which
is the most unstable mode when $M=F=0$ \citep{Michalke64}), only the primary
mode exists. In figure~\ref{fig:tanh_contour_FM}$c$, at $\alpha=0.2$, and
figure~\ref{fig:tanh_contour_FM}$d$, at $\alpha=0.01$, both modes exist,
although largely in different parts of $(M,F)$ space. Note that
figure~\ref{fig:tanh_contour_FM}$d$ and figure~\ref{fig:vortex_contour_FM} are
remarkably similar, suggesting that long-wave instabilities for this velocity
profile resemble those of the vortex sheet. This will be quantified via a
long-wave asymptotic analysis in \S\ref{sec:LWA}, in which we derive the more
general result that long-wave instabilities of \textit{any} shear-layer profile
display the characteristics of vortex sheet instabilities.
The growth rate $\alpha c_i$ is shown in figure~\ref{fig:tanh_growth} as a
function of $\alpha$. It can be seen that the secondary modes generally have
weaker growth rates than the primary modes, consistent with the results of
\cite{Blumen-et-al75}. As we shall see in \S\ref{sec:LWA}, the relation between
the two types of unstable modes can be explored in some detail in the long
wavelength limit.
\begin{figure}
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{figure6}
\caption{Contours of $c_i$ over $(M, F)$ space at ($a$) $\alpha=0.70$, ($b$)
$\alpha=0.44$, ($c$) $\alpha=0.20$, ($d$) $\alpha=0.01$. The primary modes
(here classified by $|c_r| < 10^{-3}$) are contoured as solid lines. The
secondary modes are contoured as dashed lines.}
\label{fig:tanh_contour_FM}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure}
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{figure7}
\caption{Growth rate versus $\alpha$ at selected parameter values for
$U(y)=\tanh y$. The upper four curves are primary modes, the lower two are
secondary modes.}
\label{fig:tanh_growth}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
\subsection{Instability mechanism: Counter-propagating Rossby Waves}
As mentioned above, inflection point instabilities can be attributed to
interacting Rossby waves supported by the background shear. The constructive
interference of a pair of Counter-propagating Rossby Waves (CRWs) has been
proposed as the mechanism leading to instability of shear flows in a variety of
settings \citep[e.g.,][]{Bretherton66a, Hoskins-et-al85, BainesMitsudera94,
Heifetz-et-al04a, HarnikHeifetz07}. For the SWMHD system, it is therefore
natural to enquire how this underlying mechanism is modified by magnetic and
shallow-water effects.
Let us first consider the case of $M = 0$, $F = 0$. The background vorticity
profile supports two Rossby waves, propagating in the negative (positive)
$x$-direction on the positive (negative) vorticity gradient in $y>0$ ($y<0$).
Viewed individually, the Rossby waves are neutral and propagate against the mean
flow. If, however, they become phase locked, they can interfere constructively,
leading to mutual amplification and hence instability. This is shown
schematically in figure~\ref{fig:CRWmod}, where the two Rossby waves are
represented as perturbed vorticity contours (or equivalently perturbed material
contours) for $y>0$ and $y<0$. The resulting positive and negative vorticity
anomalies are also shown. In this configuration, the transverse flow induced by
each wave acts to amplify the existing transverse material displacement of the
other. There is thus a mutual amplification and instability. This is also
consistent with numerical solutions for instabilities of the flow (\ref{e:tanh})
when $M=F=0$; figure~\ref{fig:tanh_most_unstable_eigenfunction}$a$ shows the
vorticity perturbation of the most unstable mode (with $\alpha=0.44$), in
agreement with figure~\ref{fig:CRWmod}.
\begin{figure}
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{figure8}
\caption{Modified CRW mechanism in schematic form. Shown are two displaced
material contours. The associated vorticity anomalies when $M=F=0$ are shown
by the closed solid curves; the effect of these on the other contours, leading
to instability, is shown by the longer arrows. The closed dashed curves
represent the additional vorticity anomalies when $M$ and $F$ are non-zero.
The stabilising effect of these, which opposes the driving of the instability,
is shown by the shorter arrows.}
\label{fig:CRWmod}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure}
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{figure9}
\caption{Eigenfunctions of ($a$) vorticity and ($b$) height for the most
unstable modes for $U(y)=\tanh y$ at $F=0$, $M=0$.}
\label{fig:tanh_most_unstable_eigenfunction}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
We now quantify how free-surface and magnetic effects modify this mechanism for
SWMHD. We use the SWMHD vorticity equation, which is given by
\begin{equation}\label{ch5:CRW1}
\frac{\mathrm{D} \omega}{\mathrm{D} t} \equiv
\frac{\partial \omega}{\partial {}t} + \boldsymbol{u}\cdot\nabla\omega
= -(\nabla\cdot\boldsymbol{u})\omega + M^2 {\boldsymbol{B}} \cdot \nabla{} j + M^2 (\nabla\cdot{\boldsymbol{B}}) j,
\end{equation}
where $\omega$ and $j$ are the $z$-components of the vorticity and electric
current. Using equations~\eqref{ch3:basic-equation3} and
\eqref{ch3:basic-equation4}, \eqref{ch5:CRW1} can be written as
\begin{equation}\label{ch5:CRW2}
\frac{\mathrm{D} \omega}{\mathrm{D} t} =
F^2 \omega \frac{\mathrm{D} h}{\mathrm{D} t}
+ F^2 h \omega \nabla \cdot \boldsymbol{u}
+ M^2 (1-F^2 j) {\boldsymbol{B}} \cdot \nabla{} j - M^2 h j \nabla \cdot{} {\boldsymbol{B}}.
\end{equation}
On linearising about the basic state ${\boldsymbol{U}}_{0} = U(y)\boldsymbol{e}_{x}$, ${\boldsymbol{B}}_{0}
=\boldsymbol{e}_{x}$, taking modal solutions of the form~\eqref{ch3:expform}, and noting
that $v=(\partial/\partial{}t + U \partial/\partial{}x)\eta$, where $\eta$ is the cross-stream
displacement, we obtain the the vorticity budget:
\begin{equation}\label{ch5:CRW4}
\omega = - \eta \Omega' + F^2 h\Omega
+ M^2 \frac{j}{U-c},
\end{equation}
where $\Omega = -U'$ is the basic state vorticity. The three contributions to
$\omega$ arise from the advection of the background vorticity and from
shallow-water and magnetic effects.
Inspection of figure~\ref{fig:tanh_contour_FM} shows that the instability is
most vigorous when $M=F=0$; we therefore expect that the vorticity anomalies
from the magnetic and shallow-water effects will be stabilising. The vorticity
$\omega$ and the decomposition~(\ref{ch5:CRW4}) are shown in
figure~\ref{fig:omega_contribution_most_unstable_M0.25_F0.5} for a mode at
$M=0.25$, $F=0.5$. Even though this eigenfunction results from a calculation
with non-zero $F$ and $M$, the $-\eta \Omega'$ contribution has the same
structure as that of figure~\ref{fig:tanh_most_unstable_eigenfunction}$a$. The
extra contributions from non-zero $F$ and $M$ are shown in
figure~\ref{fig:omega_contribution_most_unstable_M0.25_F0.5}$c,d$; both of
these terms are maximised at $y=0$, where they are approximately in phase. Thus,
at the simplest level, they lead to the vorticity anomalies shown by the dashed
circles in figure~\ref{fig:CRWmod}. The transverse flow induced by these
vorticity anomalies counteracts the mutually amplifying transverse flow of the
Rossby waves, and is thus stabilising.
\begin{figure}
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{figure10}
\caption{A generic vorticity budget breakdown for the case where neither $F$
nor $M$ is zero; shown here is $F=0.5$ and $M=0.25$, with ($a$) $\omega$,
($b$) $-\eta\Omega'$, ($c$) $F^2 h \Omega$, ($d$) $M^2 j/(U-c)$. Notice
that the vorticity contribution from the magnetic term is substantially
larger than that from the shallow-water term.}
\label{fig:omega_contribution_most_unstable_M0.25_F0.5}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
As a further verification of these ideas, we have also adopted a perturbative
approach to the analysis of expression~(\ref{ch5:CRW4}), approximating the
shallow-water and magnetic contributions using the eigenfunction for $M=F=0$. It
can be seen that calculating $F^2 h \Omega$ using $h$ in
figure~\ref{fig:tanh_most_unstable_eigenfunction}$b$ is consistent with the full
linear equations
(figure~\ref{fig:omega_contribution_most_unstable_M0.25_F0.5}$c$). To obtain an
estimate of the magnetic contribution, it is necessary to calculate $j$ using
the governing equations~(\ref{ch3:linear-equ1}) with the velocity obtained when
$M=F=0$. This is slightly more involved than for $h$, but can be shown to
provide a vorticity contribution consistent with
figure~\ref{fig:omega_contribution_most_unstable_M0.25_F0.5}$d$ (see
\citealt{Mak-thesis}).
\subsection{Bickley jet}
In this subsection we consider the basic state velocity defined by
\begin{equation}
U(y)=\textnormal{sech}^2 y ,
\end{equation}
again with $B(y) \equiv 1$. From inequality~\eqref{thm:hoiland}, the growth rate
$\alpha{}c_i$ is bounded above by $|U'|_{\mathrm{max}}/2=2/(3\sqrt3)$;
furthermore, from stability criterion \eqref{thm:lin-stable2}, this flow is
stable when $M\geq1/2$. When $M=F=0$, even and odd modes are unstable only in
the respective bandwidths $0 < \alpha < 2$ and $0 < \alpha < 1$
\citep[e.g.,][\S31.9]{DrazinReid-Stability}.
Figure~\ref{fig:bickley_contour_FM} shows contours of $c_i$ over $(M,F)$ space
for selected values of $\alpha$. As for figure~\ref{fig:tanh_contour_FM}, the
eigenvalues are calculated using a mode-tracking procedure, starting from the
case of $M=F=0$. The values of $\alpha$ correspond to: (i) the most unstable
mode when $M=F=0$ (panels $a$ and $b$); (ii) the mode with highest $c_i$ when
$M=F=0$ (panels $c$ and $d$); (iii) a long-wave disturbance (panels $e$ and
$f$). In all these cases the magnetic field is stabilising. This effect will be
quantified later via a long-wave asymptotic analysis.
\begin{figure}
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=140mm]{figure11}
\caption{Contours of $c_i$ over $(M,F)$ space at selected $\alpha$ for the
even (left column) and odd (right column) modes of the Bickley jet, with
($a$)~$\alpha=0.9$, ($b$)~$\alpha=0.52$, ($c$)~$\alpha=0.3$,
($d$)~$\alpha=0.23$, ($e,f$) $\alpha=0.05$. The cutoff from the
asymptotic result \eqref{ch5:bickley_asymp2} is also plotted in panel ($e$).}
\label{fig:bickley_contour_FM}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
Figure~\ref{fig:bickley_growth_even_odd} shows the growth rate at selected
parameter values. In general, the even mode is more unstable than the odd mode.
There are isolated regions where the odd mode is more unstable, although these
do not necessarily correspond to the regions predicted by the stability analysis
for the rectangular jet, described in \S4.
\begin{figure}
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{figure12}
\caption{Growth rate of the primary instability of the Bickley jet.}
\label{fig:bickley_growth_even_odd}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
A natural question to ask, prompted by the findings for the shear layer as well
as the results for the rectangular jet in \S4.2.5, is whether there are
additional modes of instability to those shown in
figure~\ref{fig:bickley_growth_even_odd}. We have performed a scan over $(M, F)$
space at various values of $\alpha$, with randomly generated initial guesses for
$c$ within the smallest rectangle containing the
semi-circle~\eqref{thm:semicircle2}. A substantial number of computations ($20$
different initialisations at over $200$ different parameter values) were carried
out, solving the governing eigenvalue equation with no parity imposed. Other
solution branches were found for large $F$ when $\alpha$ is sufficiently large,
analogous to the secondary modes for the rectangular jet in \S4.2.5. Sample
plots of $c_i$ and cross-sections of the eigenfunctions for the even modes are
shown in figure~\ref{fig:Bickley_gill_mode_F20_alp1}; the results for the odd
mode are similar. As in \S4.2.5, further secondary modes appear as $F$ increases
(figure~\ref{fig:Bickley_gill_mode_F20_alp1}$a$) and the associated growth
rates are small (figures~\ref{fig:Bickley_gill_mode_F20_alp1}$a,b$). However,
in contrast to the results shown in figure~\ref{fig:gill} for the rectangular
jet, we did not find branch crossings in $c_i$ for the Bickley jet; this may
occur at higher values of $F$, but computations are demanding since $c_i$
becomes increasingly small.
There are two distinctive features of the spatial structure of the
eigenfunctions, as shown in
figures~\ref{fig:Bickley_gill_mode_F20_alp1}$c,d,e$. First, there is a core
region consisting of approximately quantised oscillations: the primary mode has
one oscillation, the $n^{\textnormal{th}}$ secondary mode has $n+1$
oscillations. Second, the boundary of the core region is approximately located
where $U(y)=c_r$. Here the eigenfunctions are highly oscillatory and of larger
amplitude, although they are well-resolved in
figures~\ref{fig:Bickley_gill_mode_F20_alp1}$c,d,e$.
\begin{figure}
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{figure13}
\caption{Even mode of the Bickley jet at $\alpha=1$. ($a$) $c_i$ as a function
of $F$ at $M=0$, $\alpha=1$. ($b$)~ $c_i$ as a function of $M$ at $F=20$.
Crosses show the primary mode, circles and triangles the first two secondary
modes. ($c,d,e$)~Cross-sections of the vorticity perturbation for $M=0.05$,
$F=20$ for the primary and first two secondary modes. The locations where
$U=c_r$ are labelled on the axes. The spikes reach an amplitude of
approximately $0.5$; the display range has been reduced in order that the
oscillations within the core are clearly visible.}
\label{fig:Bickley_gill_mode_F20_alp1}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
\subsection{Long-wave asymptotics for unbounded smooth profiles}\label{sec:LWA}
Further understanding of shear flow instabilities in SWMHD can be obtained by
generalising the long-wave asymptotic procedure of \cite{DrazinHoward62}, who
considered two-dimensional hydrodynamics. The idea is that, for long-wave
disturbances, the leading order behaviour of the instability is determined by
$U(y)$ as $|y| \to \infty$, with higher order corrections determined by the flow
at finite $y$. In this subsection we extend the formalism of
\cite{DrazinHoward62} to SWMHD, but with a uniform magnetic field and no
topography.
We consider the governing equation~\eqref{ch5:numerical_1}, written as
\begin{equation}
\label{ch5:long1}
Z^2(G''-\alpha^2 K^2 G)+(Z^2)'G'=0,\qquad Z^2 = \frac{S^2}{K^2}.
\end{equation}
We assume that $U_\pm=U(\pm\infty)$ are well defined and that $U'$ (and so
$(Z^2)'$) decays sufficiently rapidly as $|y| \to \infty$. Then, on choosing an
appropriate frame of reference and suitable normalisation for the basic flow,
any velocity profile may be designated as either a \emph{shear layer} if
$U_\pm=\pm1$, or as a \emph{jet} if $U_\pm=0$.
Adopting the same notation as \cite{DrazinHoward62}, we consider solutions to
\eqref{ch5:long1} of the form
\begin{equation}\label{ch5:long2}
G(y)=\begin{cases}
G_{+}(y) = \chi(y) \exp(-\alpha{K_{+}}y),\ &y>0,\\
G_{-}(y) = \theta(y) \exp(+\alpha{K_{-}}y),\ &y<0,\\
\end{cases}
\end{equation}
where $K^2_{\pm} = 1 -F^2 S^2_{\pm} = 1-F^2 \left( (U_{\pm}-c)^2 - M^2 \right)$.
The perturbations must decay as $|y| \to \infty$; hence $\Real(K_{\pm})>0$. We
consider expansions of the form
\begin{equation}\label{ch5:long3}
\chi (y) = \sum^{\infty}_{n=0}(+\alpha)^{n}\chi_{n}(y), \qquad
\theta (y) =\sum^{\infty}_{n=0}(-\alpha)^{n}\theta_{n} (y),
\end{equation}
with $\chi_0, \theta_0 \to \mathrm{constant} \ (\ne 0)$ and $\chi_n, \theta_n
\to 0$ as $|y| \to \infty$ $(n \ge 1)$. It turns out to be most convenient to
fix $\chi_0(\infty) = \theta_0(-\infty) =1$, and then to accommodate the
necessary degree of freedom in the matching conditions for $G$ at $y=0$, namely
$G_{+}(0)=\Gamma{}G_{-}(0)$ and $G_{+}'(0)=\Gamma{}G_{-}'(0)$ for some constant
$\Gamma$. Consistency thus implies
\begin{equation}\label{eq:matching_condition}
G_{+}(0) G_{-}'(0) = G_{-}(0) G_{+}'(0).
\end{equation}
Without loss of generality, we shall focus on the equations for $\chi$; those
for $\theta$ follow in a similar fashion. On substituting \eqref{ch5:long2}
(with \eqref{ch5:long3}) into \eqref{ch5:long1}, equating the coefficients at
each order of $\alpha$ gives
\begin{subequations}\label{ch5:long4}
\begin{align}
0 &= \left( Z^2 \chi_0' \right)', \label{ch5:long4a} \\
0 &= \left( Z^2 \chi_1' \right)'-K_
+ \left( 2Z^2 \chi_0'+(Z^2 )'\chi_0 \right),
\label{ch5:long4b} \\
0 &= \left( Z^2 \chi_{n+2}' \right)'-
K_+ \left( 2Z^2 \chi_{n+1}' + (Z^2)' \chi_{n+1} \right)
+ Z^2 (K_+^2 - K^2) \chi_n ,\ \ n\geq0.
\label{ch5:long4c}
\end{align}
\end{subequations}
Equation \eqref{ch5:long4a} integrates to $Z^2 \chi_0' = C$, with the conditions
at infinity then giving $C=0$. Thus $\chi_0 = \textrm{constant} = 1$ through our
choice of $\chi_0(\infty)$. Integration of equations (\ref{ch5:long4}$b,c$)
then gives, after some algebra,
\begin{equation}\begin{aligned}\label{ch5:long5}
&\chi_1 = \int_{\infty}^y \left(1-\frac{Z_+^2}{Z^2}\right)\, \mathrm{d}y_{1},\\
&\chi_2=\int_{\infty}^{y}\left( \frac{1}{Z^2}
\int_{\infty}^{y_{1}}(S^2 - S^2_{+})
\ \mathrm{d}y_2
+ K_{+}^2\int_{\infty}^{y_{1}}\left(1-\frac{Z_{+}^2}{Z^2}\right)
\, \mathrm{d}y_2\right)\, \mathrm{d}y_{1}.
\end{aligned}\end{equation}
The matching condition~\eqref{eq:matching_condition} then leads to the result
\begin{equation}\begin{aligned}\label{ch5:long7}
0 & = \left( \frac{S_+^2}{K_+}+\frac{S_-^2}{K_-} \right) \\
&+ \alpha \left( \int_0^{\infty}(S^2 - S_+^2)\, \mathrm{d}y
+\int_{-\infty}^0 (S^2 -S_-^2)\, \mathrm{d}y\right.\\
&\left.-\frac{S^2_+}{K_+ K_-}\int_{-\infty}^0
\left(1-\frac{S_-^2}{S^2} \right)\mathrm{d}y
- \frac{S^2_-}{K_+K_-}\int_0^{\infty}\left(1 - \frac{S_+^2}{S^2} \right)
\, \mathrm{d}y \right) + O(\alpha^2).
\end{aligned}\end{equation}
On expressing the eigenvalue $c$ as $c= c^{(0)} + \alpha c^{(1)} + \alpha^2
c^{(2)} + \cdots$, equation~\eqref{ch5:long7} then determines the successive
$c^{(j)}$.
Although we have focused on the case of a uniform magnetic field, it is possible
to include a non-uniform field, subject to imposing conditions analogous to
those for $U(y)$. With underlying topography, other assumptions are required
\citep{CollingsGrimshaw80}.
\subsubsection{Shear layers}
For a shear layer, $U_\pm=\pm1$, and the leading order term of
expression~\eqref{ch5:long7} gives
\begin{equation}\label{ch5:long_vortex}
\frac{(1-c^{(0)})^2-M^2}{\sqrt{1-F^2 \left( (1-c^{(0)})^2-M^2 \right)}}
+\frac{(1+c^{(0)})^2 - M^2}{\sqrt{1-F^2 \left( (1+c^{(0)})^2-M^2 \right)}}=0.
\end{equation}
This is exactly the eigenvalue equation of the vortex sheet \eqref{ch4:vortex4};
hence, for any shear layer, $c\rightarrow c_{\rm v}$, as defined in
\eqref{ch4:vortex7}, as $\alpha\rightarrow0$. This is not surprising;
sufficiently long waves see the shear layer as a discontinuity in the flow.
When $F$ is sufficiently large, $c_{\rm v}$ is real (see \S4.1). In
this case, following \cite{Blumen-et-al75}, we calculate $c^{(1)}$ to seek a
secondary mode of instability. For the particular case $U(y) = \tanh y$, and
after considerable algebra, we obtain
\begin{equation}\label{ch5:long_c1_outer}\begin{aligned}
c^{(1)} =
&{\rm i}\frac{\sqrt{F^2
\left((1-c_{\rm v})^2 - M^2 \right)-1}}{4c_{\rm v}^2}
\frac{(1+c_{\rm v})^2-M^2}{\sqrt{1+4F^2+4F^4M^2}}\times\\
&\qquad\left(1+\frac{c_{\rm v}^2}{2}
\left( \log \left(
\frac{(1+c_{\rm v})^2-M^2}{(1-c_{\rm v})^2-M^2} \right)
-\delta_1 - \delta_2 \right) \right.\\
&\qquad\qquad\left. + \frac{1 -M^2-c_{\rm v}^2}{4M}
\left[ \log\left(
\frac{(1+M)^2-c_{\rm v}^2}{(1-M)^2-c_{\rm v}^2}\right)+
\delta_{1}-\delta_2\right] \right),
\end{aligned}\end{equation}
where
\begin{equation*}
\delta_{1}=\begin{cases}
\pi{\rm i}, &|c_{\rm v}-M|\leq1,\\
0, &\textnormal{otherwise},
\end{cases}
\qquad
\delta_2=\begin{cases}
\pi{\rm i}, &c_{\rm v}+M\leq1,\\
0, &\textnormal{otherwise}.
\end{cases}
\end{equation*}
It may be shown that for $M\rightarrow0$, the expression inside the square
brackets is equal to $4M(1-c_{\rm v})^{-2} + O(M^2)$, and that
equation~\eqref{ch5:long_c1_outer} is equivalent to equation~(21) in
\cite{Blumen-et-al75}. Equation~\eqref{ch5:long_c1_outer} does indeed describe
instability beyond the vortex sheet cutoff. By expanding $c_{\rm v}$ up to
powers of $F^{-4}$, it may be shown from \eqref{ch5:long_c1_outer} that
$\Imag(c^{(1)}) \downarrow 0$ as $F \rightarrow \infty$, so there is no cutoff
at finite $F$.
The analysis leading to expression~\eqref{ch5:long_c1_outer} is valid only when
$c_{\rm v}$ is not small, i.e.\ for $F^2$ not close to $2(1-M^2)^{-1}$ or $M$
not close to $1$. When $2-F^2(1-M^2)^{-1}$ is small, $O(\alpha^{2/3})$ to be
precise, we have $c_{\rm v} \sim \alpha{}c^{(1)} \sim \alpha^{1/3}$. Rescaling
and choosing the appropriate branch so that $\Real(\sqrt{\cdots})>0$, gives
$c^{(1)}$ as the solution of the cubic equation
\begin{equation}\label{ch5:long_c1_inner}
\frac{6 + 2M^2}{(1-M^2)^3}\left( c^{(1)}\right)^3
+ \left(\frac{2}{1-M^2}-F^2\right) c^{(1)}
- {\rm i} \alpha \left( \frac{1}{1-M^2}
+ \frac{1}{2M}\log\frac{1+M}{1-M} \right) = 0,
\end{equation}
for $\alpha^{2/3}\sim2(1-M^2)^{-1}-F^2\rightarrow0$. When $M=0$,
equation~\eqref{ch5:long_c1_inner} reduces to equation~(23) in
\cite{Blumen-et-al75}. There are two admissible roots with positive imaginary
parts. There is a transition to non-zero real parts when
\begin{equation}\label{ch5:long_c1_cusp}
F^2_{\textnormal{cusp}}=\frac{2}{1-M^2}
- 3\left( \frac{\alpha^2}{4}\frac{6+2M^2}{(1-M^2)^{3}}
\left( \frac{1}{1-M^2} + \frac{1}{2M}\log\frac{1+M}{1-M} \right)^2
\right)^{1/3}.
\end{equation}
This expression reduces to $F^2_{\textnormal{cusp}} = 2 - 3(6\alpha^2)^{1/3}$
when $M \to 0$, as given by \cite{Blumen-et-al75}.
The asymptotic results, together with the numerical computations of \S5.2, are
presented in figure~\ref{fig:second_mode_asymp_alp001}. The agreement between
the two, including the location of the cusp given by
equation~\eqref{ch5:long_c1_cusp}, is excellent.
\begin{figure}
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{figure14}
\caption{$c_i$ and $c_r$ versus $F$ at $\alpha=0.01$ for ($a$) $M=0$, ($b$)
$M=0.25$, ($c$) $M=0.5$. The crosses are the computed results for $U(y)=\tanh
y$, the solid lines are the asymptotic result $c_{\rm v} + \alpha{} c^{(1)}$
with $c^{(1)}$ given by \eqref{ch5:long_c1_outer}, and the dot-dashed lines
are the inner expansion given by the relevant solution to the cubic
equation~\eqref{ch5:long_c1_inner}.}
\label{fig:second_mode_asymp_alp001}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
\subsubsection{Jets}
For a jet, $U_{\pm}=0$ and \eqref{ch5:long7} simplifies to
\begin{equation}\label{ch5:long_jet}
0=\frac{2S_0^2}{K_0} + \alpha\left( \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}(S^2 - S_0^2)
\, \mathrm{d}y
- \frac{S_0^2}{K_0^2} \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}
\left(1 - \frac{S_0^2}{S^2} \right)\, \mathrm{d}y \right) + O(\alpha^2),
\end{equation}
where $S_0^2 = (0-c)^2 - M^2$. Here, for a fixed value of $F$, we need to
consider different regimes for $M$.
For $F^2=O(1)$, if $M^2 = O(1)$ then $c^{(0)}$ and $c^{(1)}$ are real. To find
an instability we need to consider the regime $M^2 \sim \alpha$, which implies
$c^{(0)} = 0$. At the next order, we choose to balance the first two terms on
the right hand side of \eqref{ch5:long_jet}, assuming that the second integral
is negligible; this is confirmed by the analysis of Appendix~\ref{appendix1}.
Defining $E=\int^{+\infty}_{-\infty}U^2/2\ \textnormal{d}y$, where $U$ is
assumed to decay sufficiently rapidly that $E$ is finite, we obtain
\begin{equation}\label{ch5:long_jet1}
c\sim{} {\rm i} \sqrt{\alpha{}E - M^2} \qquad \textnormal{as} \qquad
M^2 \sim \alpha \to 0,\quad F^2 = O(1).
\end{equation}
The corresponding result for compressible hydrodynamics was derived by
\cite{GillDrazin65}, and for incompressible MHD by \cite{Gedzelman73}.
For large $F$, the regime of interest is $M^2 \sim \alpha$, $F^2 \sim
\alpha^{-1}$. Considering the same balance as above gives
\begin{equation}\label{ch5:long_jet2}
c \sim{} {\rm i} \left( \frac{\alpha^2 F^2 E^2}{2} - M^2 +
\sqrt{\alpha^2 E^2 + \frac{\alpha^4 F^4 E^4 }{4}} \right)^{1/2} \qquad
\textnormal{as} \qquad F^{-2} \sim{} M^2 \sim \alpha \to 0.
\end{equation}
This result reduces to \eqref{ch5:long_jet1} in the limit of small $F$.
Equations \eqref{ch5:long_jet1} and \eqref{ch5:long_jet2} are the extensions to
smooth velocity profiles of equations \eqref{ch4:jet_even_asymp2} and
\eqref{ch4:jet_even_asymp3}, which are the dispersion relations for the even
mode of the top-hat jet. It is interesting to note that the odd modes are not
recovered by this analysis.
For the Bickley jet, $2E = \int^{+\infty}_{-\infty}(\textnormal{sech}^2y)^2\
\textnormal{d}y=4/3$ and \eqref{ch5:long_jet1} and \eqref{ch5:long_jet2} become
\begin{equation}
\label{ch5:bickley_asymp1}
c \sim {\rm i} \sqrt{\frac{2}{3} \alpha - M^2} \qquad \textnormal{as} \qquad
M^2 \sim \alpha \to 0, \quad F^2 = O(1) ,
\end{equation}
and
\begin{equation}
\label{ch5:bickley_asymp2}
c \sim {\rm i} \left( \frac{2}{9} \alpha^2 F^2 - M^2
+ \frac{2}{3} \sqrt{\alpha^2 + \frac{\alpha^4 F^4}{9}} \right)^{1/2}
\qquad \textnormal{as} \qquad
F^{-2} \sim{} M^2 \sim \alpha \to 0.
\end{equation}
In figure~\ref{fig:bickley_small_alp_asymp_B01} the growth rates given by
\eqref{ch5:bickley_asymp1} and \eqref{ch5:bickley_asymp2} are plotted against
those determined numerically from equation~\eqref{ch5:numerical_1}; there is
good agreement at small $\alpha$. The cutoff implied by
\eqref{ch5:bickley_asymp2} is also shown in
figure~\ref{fig:bickley_contour_FM}$e$.
\begin{figure}
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{figure15}
\caption{Comparison of the computed growth rates for the even modes (crosses)
and the predicted growth rates from the asymptotic results for $U(y) =
\textnormal{sech}^2 y$, for $M=0.1$ and ($a$) $F=0$, ($b$) $F=1$, ($c$) $F=5$,
($d$) $F=10$. $\alpha \times \textrm{Im}$\eqref{ch5:bickley_asymp1} is given
by the dot-dashed line (cutoff plotted as vertical dotted line) and $\alpha
\times \textrm{Im}$\eqref{ch5:bickley_asymp2} is given by the solid line
(cutoff plotted as vertical dashed line).}
\label{fig:bickley_small_alp_asymp_B01}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
The above asymptotic procedure does not yield the odd modes for smooth velocity
profiles; for these modes, $c_r$ remains $O(1)$ as $\alpha \to 0$, as can be
verified numerically. The difficulty can be traced back to
equation~\eqref{ch5:long1} since, when $M^2 \sim \alpha$, $Z^2$ becomes small
when $U \approx c_r$. The standard asymptotic procedure leading to
equations~\eqref{ch5:long4} breaks down. Instead it is found that $c_i \sim
\alpha^{2/3}$, a result that has been derived for the hydrodynamic case by
\cite{DrazinHoward62}.
\section{Conclusions and discussions}
The SWMHD equations, introduced by \cite{Gilman00}, are a useful model for
studying MHD in thin stratified fluid layers. We have investigated the linear
instability of parallel shear flows with an aligned magnetic field in planar
geometry with no background rotation. The instability of hydrodynamic shear
flows is a classical problem, with well known results such as Rayleigh's
inflection point criterion, Howard's semi-circle theorem and H{\o}iland's growth
rate bound, supplemented by extensive asymptotic and numerical results for
various idealised flows. Motivated by geophysical and astrophysical
considerations, previous authors have extended separately the analysis to
include the influence of shallow-water dynamics and a magnetic field. Here, for
the first time, we have applied this classical approach to the SWMHD system,
complementing previous work on the instability of specific flow configurations
in spherical geometry \citep{GilmanDikpati02, Dikpati-et-al03}.
We first considered the stability of arbitrary flow and field profiles, leading
to the growth rate bound~\eqref{thm:hoiland} and the semi-circle
theorems~\eqref{thm:semicircle1} and \eqref{thm:semicircle2}, which, in turn,
imply the stability criteria~\eqref{thm:lin-stable1} -- \eqref{thm:lin-stable3}.
More detailed investigations focused on shear layers and jets, which are known
from hydrodynamical problems to be canonical flows \citep{DrazinHoward62}. For
each of these we considered both discontinuous profiles, for which dispersion
relations can be obtained analytically, and analogous smooth profiles, for which
numerical solutions were obtained. We also took the background magnetic field to
be uniform; this simple choice already leads to interesting stability
characteristics. The imposed field strength is measured by a parameter $M$,
whilst the stratification is measured by the Froude number $F$.
For the shear layer we considered the vortex sheet and the hyperbolic tangent
velocity profile. For both profiles, a key finding is that, although increasing
$M$ or $F$ in the absence of the other is seen to be stabilising, their combined
effects can offset each other, resulting in a tongue of instability for
arbitrarily large $F$ and $M$ approaching unity. However, the strongest
instabilities are found at smaller $F$ and $M$. For the smooth shear layer,
these were interpreted through the counter-propagating Rossby waves (CRWs)
mechanism, which has been used to understand hydrodynamic shear instabilities
\citep[e.g.,][]{Carpenter-et-al13}. Here we show that the vorticity anomalies
associated with shallow-water effects and magnetic tension oppose those for the
underlying CRW mechanism. As far as we can tell, this is the first time such a
dynamic argument has been invoked to explain the stabilisation of shear flow
instabilities by a magnetic field. For the smooth shear layer alone, there is a
weak secondary instability when $F>1$, analogous to those found in other
hydrodynamic systems \citep{Blumen-et-al75, Balmforth99}. Further insight was
obtained by performing a long wave asymptotic analysis for an arbitrary shear
profile, extending the hydrodynamic treatment of \cite{DrazinHoward62} to SWMHD.
There is a primary mode of instability, yielding a dispersion relation identical
to that of the vortex sheet, thus showing the widespread applicability of the
vortex sheet model. For sufficiently large $F$, the long wave analysis recovers
the weaker secondary mode.
For jets, we considered the top-hat velocity profile and, as its smooth
counterpart, the Bickley jet. For both profiles, the modes of instability are
either even or odd about the jet axis. At large $\alpha$, dynamics on the flanks
of the top-hat become uncoupled, and hence the instabilities become those of the
vortex sheets on the flanks. However, this behaviour does not carry over to the
Bickley jet, since the even and odd modes are stabilised when $\alpha>2$ and
$\alpha>1$, respectively. For small $\alpha$, the even mode is only unstable
when $M<M_c=O(\alpha^{1/2})$. This result applies for both the top-hat profile
and arbitrary smooth jets, showing the widespread applicability of the top-hat
model for the even mode at small $\alpha$. For small $\alpha$, the odd mode is
also only unstable for sufficiently small $M$. The growth rate $c_i =
O(\alpha^{1/2})$ for the top-hat profile, but $c_i = O(\alpha^{2/3})$ for the
Bickley jet, so the analogy between the top-hat and smooth velocity profiles is
lost. Although we can be precise about the behaviour at large and small
$\alpha$, in general either the even or odd mode may
be more unstable. Finally, in addition to these two primary modes of
instability, there exist multiple secondary modes of instability at large $F$,
with relatively small growth rates.
Given the motivation for this study, it is important to consider the
implications of our results for the solar tachocline. Adopting the tachocline
radius ($\approx 0.7R_\odot$) as a characteristic length scale $L_0$ and taking
$U_{0}=500 \,{\rm m \, s^{-1}}$ as a characteristic velocity, as discussed in
\S2, the $e$-folding time for an instability is given by $\hat{t}=(\alpha
c_i)^{-1}(L_{0}/U_{0}) \approx 10^6 (\alpha c_i)^{-1} s$. With $F \approx 0.1$,
$\alpha c_i \approx 0.1$ over the range of $M$ anticipated for the tachocline,
for both shear layers and jets (see figures~\ref{fig:tanh_growth} and
\ref{fig:bickley_growth_even_odd}), leading to large-scale instabilities with
$\hat{t} = O(10^7){\rm s}$, a relevant timescale for solar dynamics.
It is hard to draw direct comparisons with previous results on SWMHD
instabilities \citep{GilmanDikpati02, Dikpati-et-al03, GilmanCally07}. These
studies, which were focused on the tachocline, were in spherical geometry with
background rotation. Furthermore, the main emphasis of the work was on the
destabilisation of hydrodynamically stable velocity profiles by non-uniform
toroidal fields.
Having investigated the quite complicated behaviour that results from our
idealised model, there are, within the present geometry, several natural
extensions of our study. The inclusion of rotation could be considered; even in
the hydrodynamic case this modifies the nature of the instabilities. Non-uniform
magnetic fields open up the possibility of destabilising hydrodynamically stable
velocity profiles, as in \cite{GilmanDikpati02} and \cite{Dikpati-et-al03}. The
nonlinear evolution of the instability and the associated changes in the mean
flow are clearly of interest; some preliminary results are given in
\cite{Mak-thesis}.
This work was supported by the STFC doctoral training grant ST/F006934/1. JM
thanks Eyal Heifetz for helpful discussions.
|
\section{Proof of Theorem \ref{mainthm}}
\begin{lem} \label{l:fix intersect}
Suppose that a group $G$ acts on a tree $T$ and that $g,h \in G$ are commuting elements which both act elliptically on $T$. Then $\mathrm{Fix}(g) \cap \mathrm{Fix}(h) \ne \emptyset$.
\end{lem}
\begin{proof}
Since $g$ and $h$ commute $g$ leaves the subtree $\mathrm{Fix}(h)$ invariant. However, it also fixes $\mathrm{Fix}(g)$, which means that if these trees are disjoint $g$ must fix (pointwise) the unique shortest path $p$ between $\mathrm{Fix}(g)$ and $\mathrm{Fix}(h)$. This implies that in fact $p$ must be contained in $\mathrm{Fix}(g)$, which means that the fixed trees are not in fact disjoint.
\end{proof}
Recall that given a vertex $v$ in a graph $\Gamma$, $\mathrm{link}(v)$ is the subgraph induced by $\{u\in V(\Gamma)\;|\; (v, u)\in E(\Gamma)\}$ and $\mathrm{star}(v)$ is the subgraph induced by $\mathrm{link}(v)\cup\{v\}$.
\begin{lem}\label{l:hyp vert}
If $A(\Gamma)$ acts on a tree with abelian edge stabilizers and $v\in V(\Gamma)$ is hyperbolic, then $\mathrm{star}(v)$ is a clique and $\{u\in \mathrm{link}(v)\;|\; u \text{ is elliptic}\}$ separates $v$ and $\Gamma\setminus \mathrm{link}(v)$.
\end{lem}
\begin{proof}
Let $u, w\in \mathrm{link}(v)$. Since $u$ and $w$ commute with $v$, they must preserve the axis of $v$ setwise. Hence we can find integers $n_1, n_2, m_1, m_2$ with $n_1,m_1 \ne 0$ so that each of $g = u^{n_1}v^{n_2}$ and $h = w^{m_1}v^{m_2}$ fix the axis of $v$ pointwise, in particular the subgroup $\langle g, h\rangle$ stabilizes an edge of $T$. Thus $\langle g, h\rangle$ is abelian, which can only happen if $u$ and $w$ commute. This shows that $\mathrm{star}(v)$ is a clique. By the same proof, if $v^\prime\in \mathrm{star}(v)$ is hyperbolic, then $\mathrm{star}(v^\prime)$ is a clique and hence $\mathrm{star}(v^\prime)=\mathrm{star}(v)$. Thus, if $\Gamma\setminus \mathrm{star}(v)\neq\emptyset$, then $\Gamma\setminus\{u\in \mathrm{link}(v)\;|\; u \text{ is elliptic}\}$ is disconnected.
\end{proof}
\begin{proof} (Theorem \ref{mainthm})
Suppose that $\Gamma$ is connected and not a complete graph, and suppose that $A(\Gamma)$ acts on a tree $T$ with no global fixed points and abelian edge stabilizers. We use the action of $A(\Gamma)$ on $T$ to find a separating clique in $\Gamma$.
First, suppose that some $v\in V(\Gamma)$ acts hyperbolically on $T$. Then by Lemma \ref{l:hyp vert}, $\mathrm{star}(v)$ is a clique and hence not all of $\Gamma$. Then $\mathrm{link}(v)$ is a clique which separates $v$ from $\Gamma\setminus \mathrm{star}(v)$, so $\Gamma$ contains a separating clique.
Thus, we may suppose that each vertex of $\Gamma$ acts elliptically on $T$. Since the action has no global fixed point, it follows from Helly's theorem that for some $x, y\in V(\Gamma)$, $\mathrm{Fix}(x)\cap \mathrm{Fix}(y)=\emptyset$. Let $q$ be the shortest path between $\mathrm{Fix}(x)$ and $\mathrm{Fix}(y)$, and let $p$ be a point in the interior of an edge on $q$ which is not in $\mathrm{Fix}(x)$ or $\mathrm{Fix}(y)$. We define a map $F : \Gamma \to T$ as follows: first choose $a_x \in \mathrm{Fix}(x)$ and $a_y \in \mathrm{Fix}(y)$ and define $F(x) = a_x$ and $F(y) = a_y$. Now for vertices $u$ such that $p \in \mathrm{Fix}(u)$, define $F(u) = p$. For any other vertex $z$ of $\Gamma$, choose some $a_z \in \mathrm{Fix}(z)$ and define $F(z) = a_z$. For an edge $e$ of $\Gamma$ between vertices $u$ and $v$, let $F$ continuously map $e$ onto the (possibly degenerate) geodesic between $F(u)$ and $F(v)$. This defines a continuous map $F : \Gamma \to T$.
Lemma \ref{l:fix intersect} implies (for vertices $u$ and $v$ which are adjacent in $\Gamma$) that $\mathrm{Fix}(u) \cap \mathrm{Fix}(v) \ne \emptyset$, hence $F(e)\subseteq \mathrm{Fix}(u)\cup \mathrm{Fix}(v)$. Consequently we have $F(\Gamma)\subseteq \bigcup_{v\in V(\Gamma)}\mathrm{Fix}(v)$.
Since $\Gamma$ is connected and $F$ is continuous, the image $F(\Gamma)$ is connected. This implies that $p \in F(\Gamma)\subseteq \bigcup_{v\in V(\Gamma)}\mathrm{Fix}(v)$. Hence $F^{-1}(p)$ is a non-empty subgraph of $\Gamma$, and since $p$ separates $F(\Gamma)$ (since $T$ is a tree), $F^{-1}(p)$ separates $\Gamma$. The subgroup generated by the vertices of $F^{-1}(p)$ all fix the edge containing $p$, hence this subgroup is abelian and therefore $F^{-1}(p)$ is a separating clique.
\end{proof}
\section{Vertex-elliptic abelian JSJ decomposition}\label{sec:JSJ}
Suppose that $\Gamma$ is a finite connected graph. In this section, we build a JSJ decomposition for $A(\Gamma)$, a decomposition which in some sense encodes all possible abelian splittings of $A(\Gamma)$. However, we first restrict our attention to those splittings in which each vertex of $\Gamma$ acts elliptically. The reason for this restriction is that actions with hyperbolic vertices all arise through simplicial actions of $\mathbb Z^n$ on a line, and such an action can be easily modified to make $\mathbb Z^n$ act elliptically. Indeed, suppose $A(\Gamma)$ acts on a tree $T$ with abelian edge stabilizers such that some $v\in V(\Gamma)$ acts hyperbolically. By Lemma \ref{l:hyp vert}, $\mathrm{star}(v)$ is a clique and hence $A(\mathrm{star}(v))\cong \mathbb Z^n$ for some $n\geq 1$. Let $\mathrm{star}(v)=\mathrm{star}_h(v)\sqcup\mathrm{star}_e(v)$, where each vertex of $\mathrm{star}_h(v)$ acts hyperbolically on $T$ and each vertex of $\mathrm{star}_e(v)$ acts elliptically. Let $\Gamma^\prime=\Gamma\setminus\mathrm{star}_h(v)$. By Lemma \ref{l:hyp vert}, $A(\Gamma)$ has the splitting
\[
A(\Gamma)=A(\Gamma^\prime)\ast_{A(\mathrm{star}_e(v))}A(\mathrm{star}(v)).
\]
Furthermore this splitting is compatible with the splitting of $A(\Gamma^\prime)$ induced by its action on $T$ since $A(\mathrm{star}_e(v))$ acts elliptically on $T$. Hence we get a new splitting of $A(\Gamma)$ such that $v$ is elliptic and the induced splitting of $A(\Gamma^\prime)$ is the same as the splitting induced by its action on $T$. Repeating this procedure, any abelian splitting of $A(\Gamma)$ can be replaced by a splitting in which all vertices act elliptically. We call such a splitting a {\em vertex-elliptic abelian} splitting.
If $\Gamma$ is a complete graph, then there are no nontrivial vertex-elliptic abelian splittings of $A(\Gamma)$. Therefore, we henceforth suppose that $\Gamma$ is both connected and not a complete graph.
One consequence of considering only vertex-elliptic actions is that HNN-extensions cannot arise: the corresponding graph of groups is a tree.
\begin{prop}
Let $A(\Gamma)$ act on a tree such that each vertex of $\Gamma$ acts elliptically. Then the corresponding graph of groups is a tree.
\end{prop}
\begin{proof}
Let $\mathcal G$ be the corresponding graph of groups decomposition of $A(\Gamma)$, and let $G$ be the underlying graph of $\mathcal G$. Then there is a natural surjective map $A(\Gamma)\to\pi_1(G)$ which maps the elliptic elements of $A(\Gamma)$ to the identity. But $A(\Gamma)$ is generated by elliptic elements, so $\pi_1(G)=\{1\}$ which means that $G$ is a tree.
\end{proof}
The following lemma is an immediate consequence of Lemma \ref{l:fix intersect} and Helly's theorem.
\begin{lem} \label{l:clique elliptic}
Suppose $A(\Gamma)$ acts on a tree $T$ such that each vertex of $\Gamma$ acts elliptically. Then for any clique $K$ in $\Gamma$, $A(K)$ acts elliptically on $T$.
\end{lem}
We will use the language of Guirardel-Levitt \cite{GuiLevJSJI} in order to describe the vertex-elliptic abelian JSJ decomposition of $A(\Gamma)$. Given $A(\Gamma)$, let $\mathcal A$ be the set of abelian subgroups of $A(\Gamma)$ and $\mathcal H=\{\langle v\rangle\;|\; v\in V(\Gamma)\}$. If $A(\Gamma)$ acts on a tree $T$ such that each edge stabilizer is abelian and each vetex of $\Gamma$ is elliptic, then $T$ is called an $(\mathcal A, \mathcal H)$-tree. An $(\mathcal A, \mathcal H)$-tree $T$ is called \emph{universally elliptic} if the edge stabilizers of $T$ are elliptic in every other $(\mathcal A, \mathcal H)$-tree. Also, given trees $T$ and $T^\prime$, we say $T$ \emph{dominates} $T^\prime$ if every vertex stabilizer of $T$ is elliptic with respect to $T^\prime$.
\begin{defn}
A graph of groups decomposition $\mathcal G$ of $A(\Gamma)$ is called a \emph{vertex-elliptic abelian JSJ-decomposition of $A(\Gamma)$} if the corresponding Bass-Serre tree $T$ is an $(\mathcal A, \mathcal H)$-tree which is universally elliptic and which dominates every other universally elliptic $(\mathcal A, \mathcal H)$-tree.
\end{defn}
\begin{figure}
\centering\input{RAAGSJSJ.pdf_tex}\\
\caption{A graph $\Gamma$ with the vertex-elliptic abelian JSJ-decomposition of $A(\Gamma)$.}\label{fig1}
\end{figure}
We will now build a vertex-elliptic abelian JSJ decomposition for the group $A(\Gamma)$. If $\Gamma$ has no separating cliques then this JSJ decomposition is trivial. Otherwise, suppose that the minimal size of a separating clique in $\Gamma$ is $k$. Let $K^1, \ldots , K^n$ be the collection of all separating cliques of size $k$.
Each $K^i$ defines a vertex-elliptic abelian splitting of $A(\Gamma)$ as follows. The underlying graph of the splitting is a tree with a valence-one vertex for each component $\Gamma^{i,j}$ of $\Gamma \smallsetminus K^i$, all adjacent to single central vertex. The vertex corresponding to $\Gamma^{i,j}$ has associated vertex group $A(\Gamma^{i,j} \cup K^i)$, while the central vertex has vertex group $A(K^i)$. All of the edge groups correspond to $A(K^i)$ in the natural way. In case there are only two components of $\Gamma \smallsetminus K^i$, this is a reducible two-edge splitting, which can be transformed into a one-edge splitting in the obvious way.
By Lemma \ref{l:clique elliptic} each $A(K^j)$ is elliptic in the splitting defined by $K^i$. Therefore, the splittings with edge groups $A(K^i)$ can be refined into a single (vertex-elliptic abelian) splitting $\Lambda$ of $A(\Gamma)$. The vertex groups of $\Lambda$ naturally correspond to connected subgraphs of $\Gamma$.
For each such subgraph $\Gamma^i$ we can repeat this procedure with any separating cliques of minimal size that it has (they are necessarily of size larger than $k$). Since we are only considering vertex-elliptic splittings, Lemma \ref{l:clique elliptic} implies that any such splitting of $A(\Gamma^i)$ can be extended to a vertex-elliptic abelian splitting of $A(\Gamma)$ in an obvious way.
Eventually, we find a vertex-elliptic abelian splitting $\mathcal G$ of $A(\Gamma)$ so that the subgraphs associated to the vertex groups are connected and contain no separating cliques.
See Figure \ref{fig1} for an example where one edge adjacent to each reducible valence two vertex has been contracted.
\begin{thm}
$\mathcal G$ is a vertex-elliptic abelian JSJ-decomposition of $A(\Gamma)$.
\end{thm}
\begin{proof}
Let $T$ be the Bass-Serre tree corresponding to $\mathcal G$. Note that, up to conjugation, each edge stabilizer in $T$ is of the form $A(K)$, where $K$ is a clique inside of $\Gamma$. Suppose $A(\Gamma)$ acts on another $(\mathcal A, \mathcal H)$-tree $T^\prime$. Then by Lemma \ref{l:clique elliptic}, for every clique $K$ of $\Gamma$, $A(K)$ acts elliptically on $T^\prime$, hence $T$ is universally elliptic.
Next we show that for any $(\mathcal A,\mathcal H)$-tree $T^\prime$, $T$ dominates $T^\prime$. Up to conjugation, each vertex stabilizer of $T$ is of the form $A(\Gamma^\prime)$, where $\Gamma^\prime$ is a connected subgraph of $\Gamma$ which has no separating cliques. If $\Gamma^\prime$ is a clique, then $A(\Gamma^\prime)$ acts elliptically on $T^\prime$ by the previous paragraph. If $\Gamma^\prime$ is not a clique, then $A(\Gamma^\prime)$ must act elliptically on $T^\prime$ otherwise this action would violate Theorem \ref{mainthm}.
\end{proof}
\small
\bibliographystyle{alpha}
\def$'${$'$}
|
\section{Introduction} \label{sec:introduction}
The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) has confirmed the effective description of the electroweak
sector given by the Standard Model (SM) Lagrangian with the discovery of the Higgs boson and the analysis of its properties. It also features a
very strong potential for the discovery or exclusion of new physics/particles, thus opening the possibility of investigating both
strongly and weakly coupled extensions of the Standard Model. New vector-like (VL) fermions are often present in many of the extensions
of the SM, especially in relation with the top sector (top partners,
as for example in composite Higgs models \cite{Agashe:2004rs,Contino:2006qr,Giudice:2007fh,Matsedonskyi:2012ym},
extra-dimensional models \cite{Antoniadis:1990ew,Antoniadis:2001cv,Csaki:2003sh,Hosotani:2004wv,Cacciapaglia:2009pa},
little Higgs models \cite{ArkaniHamed:2002qx,ArkaniHamed:2002qy,Schmaltz:2005ky}, gauge-Higgs models \cite{Hosotani:1983xw}, gauge coupling
unification \cite{Choudhury:2001hs,Panico:2008bx} and models with an extended custodial symmetry \cite{Agashe:2006at,Chivukula:2011jh}).
Both CMS \cite{twikiCMS} and ATLAS \cite{twikiATLAS} have recently devoted a considerable effort in the analyses apt to setting
bounds on this type of new particles. Initially, simplifying assumptions were considered (mixing only with the third generation of SM quark
family or specific decay modes) \cite{delAguila:2000rc,AguilarSaavedra:2005pv,Anastasiou:2009rv,AguilarSaavedra:2009es,Cacciapaglia:2010vn,Marzocca:2012zn,DeSimone:2012fs,Falkowski:2013jya,Aguilar-Saavedra:2013wba,Ellis:2014dza}.
However the most recent analyses, due to larger data samples, allow exploring more general situations with mixing of VL quarks with the first two
generation of SM quarks \cite{Cacciapaglia:2011fx,Okada:2012gy,Buchkremer:2013bha,Delaunay:2013pwa,Barducci:2014ila}.
Considering the presence of a complete multiplet of the symmetries of the Standard Model is however not enough in some realistic scenarios: in fact,
theoretically justified models often contain a multiplet of larger global symmetries which can be described in terms of several multiplets which are close
in mass. The various multiplets then mix with each other via the Higgs interactions.
The presence of general mixing structures and the interplay of different multiplets typically affects the tree-level and loop-level
bounds, thereby modifying the results expected by performing simplified analyses based on a single particle or a single multiplet.
This work is devoted to the detailed exploration of general structures and mixing of more than one VL quark multiplet and, specifically, we study in
detail the implications of the presence of \textit{two} VL quark multiplets mixings with \textit{any} of the 3 SM quark generation.
We also focus on a specific sub-set of scenarios where both VL multiplets contain a top partner ({\sl i.e.} with electric charge $+2/3\ e$), and where
eventual bottom partners (i.e. with electric charge $-1/3\ e$) do not mix with the SM down sector.
This choice is done to minimise the constraints from flavour, which are very severe on mixing in the down sector only. In the scenarios we
selected, larger mixing angles are allowed thus providing larger single production cross sections at the LHC.
These scenarios are also theoretically justified in models where the new physics couples dominantly to the top quark.
Of course, depending upon the multiplet considered, non-SM quarks, {\sl i.e.} quarks having non-SM electric charge, may be present in the
considered multiplets. We have estimated the constraints on such scenarios from electroweak precision (EWP) data (oblique and non-oblique)
and current LHC data.
The paper is organized as follows: in Section \ref{sec:model} we classify (through their $(SU(2)_L, U(1)_Y)$ quantum numbers) all the
possible pairs of VL multiplets that can interact with SM quarks via a SM Higgs doublet. In Section \ref{sec:yukawa} the Yukawa couplings
of the VL multiplets with SM quark generations are described. In the same section we have also identified three kind of scenarios depending
on the multiplet content, namely: top-type multiplets, bottom-type multiplets and mixed multiplets. The mass matrices of the cases we
considered in our analysis are provided in Section \ref{sec:massmatrices}.
Section \ref{sec:bounds} is devoted to a discussion of the bounds
and constraints on masses and mixing parameters we considered for the numerical analysis: in Section \ref{sec:bounds:1} we describe the
tree-level bounds, while the bounds coming from oblique corrections, {\sl i.e.} $S$ and $T$ parameters
\cite{Peskin:1990zt,Peskin:1991sw}, are discussed in Section \ref{sec:bounds:2}.
In Section \ref{sec:results} we present the results of our numerical analysis: in Sections \ref{sec:results:1}-\ref{sec:results:4} the bounds
on parameter space from tree-level constraints and EWP tests are described, while in Section \ref{sec:results:5} we provide a comparison
between the bounds from single VL top production at LHC14 with flavour and EWP bounds. We finally conclude in Section \ref{sec:concl}.
\section{Vector-like multiplets}
\label{sec:model}
The minimal set of VL multiplets that can mix with SM quarks and a SM (or SM-like) Higgs
boson have been extensively studied in literature \cite{delAguila:1982fs,delAguila:2000rc,Aguilar-Saavedra:2013wba,Cacciapaglia:2010vn,Cacciapaglia:2011fx,Okada:2012gy,Buchkremer:2013bha}.
\begin{table}[htp]
\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{| l | c | c | c | c | c |}
\hline
Multiplet & $\psi$ & $(SU(2)_{L},U(1)_{Y})$ & $T_{3}$ & $Q_{EM}$ & Yukawa to SM \\ \hline
Singlet 2/3 & $U$ & $({\bf 1},2/3)$ & 0 & +2/3 & Yes \\ \hline
Doublet 7/6 & $\left( \begin{array}{c} X^{5/3} \\ U \end{array}
\right)$ & $({\bf 2},7/6)$
& $\begin{array}{c} +1/2 \\ -1/2 \end{array}$
& $\begin{array}{c}+5/3 \\ +2/3 \end{array} $ & Yes \\ \hline
Triplet 5/3 & $\left( \begin{array}{c} X^{8/3} \\ X^{5/3} \\ U
\end{array} \right)$ & $({\bf 3},5/3)$ & $\begin{array}{c} +2 \\ +1
\\ 0 \end{array}$ & $\begin{array}{c} +8/3 \\ +5/3 \\ +2/3
\end{array}$ & No \\ \hline
\end{tabular}
\caption{Quantum numbers for the top--type VL multiplets (up to triplets), explicitly indicating weak isospin, hypercharge, electric charge ($Q_{EM}$) and if a direct Yukawa coupling to SM quarks is allowed.}
\label{QN_vec-top}
\end{center}
\end{table}
In Tables \ref{QN_vec-top}-\ref{QN_vec-mixed} we list the $SU(2)_{L}\times U(1)_{Y}$ quantum numbers of the VL quark multiplets that can
have interactions -- when taken alone or in pairs -- with SM quark generations and Higgs boson doublet under $SU(2)_{L} \times U(1)_{Y}$ symmetry.
The tables are organized as follows:
\begin{itemize}
\item{} top-type multiplets (Table \ref{QN_vec-top}): multiplets
containing one VL top partner but no bottom partners ({{\sl i.e.}} no VL
quark with electric charge $-1/3\ e$). In addition to a
top partner, these multiplets may contain quarks with exotic charges
$5/3\ e$ and $8/3\ e$.
\item{} bottom-type multiplets (Table \ref{QN_vec-bottom}): multiplets
containing one VL bottom partner but no top partners ({{\sl i.e.}} no VL
quark with charge $2/3\ e$). In addition to a
bottom partner these multiplets may contain quarks with exotic
charges $-4/3\ e$ and $-7/3\ e$.
\item{} mixed multiplets (Table \ref{QN_vec-mixed}): multiplets
containing both VL top and bottom partners. In addition these multiplets
may contain all of the exotic charged VL quarks.
\end{itemize}
The multiplets in these Tables constitute the building blocks we will use to construct scenarios with 2 VL multiplets~\footnote{A model
where quarks and leptons were taken as a part of quadruplet is given in \cite{Uschersohn:1984cg}}.
\begin{table}[htp]
\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{| l | c | c | c | c | c |}\hline
Multiplet & $\psi$ & $(SU(2)_{L},U(1)_{Y})$ & $T_{3}$
& $Q_{EM}$ & Yukawa to SM \\ \hline
Singlet-1/3 & $D$ & $({\bf 1},-1/3)$ &
0 & -1/3 & Yes \\ \hline
Doublet -5/6 & $\left(\begin{array}{c}D \\ Y^{-4/3}\end{array}\right)$
& $({\bf 2},-5/6)$ & $\begin{array}{c}+1/2 \\ -1/2 \end{array}$
& $\begin{array}{c} -1/3 \\ -4/3 \end{array}$ & Yes
\\ \hline
Triplet -4/3 & $\left(\begin{array}{c}D \\ Y^{-4/3} \\ Y^{-7/3}
\end{array} \right)$ & $({\bf 3},-4/3)$ & $\begin{array}{c}0 \\ -1\\
-2 \end{array}$ & $\begin{array}{c}-1/3 \\ -4/3 \\ -7/3 \end{array}$ & No
\\ \hline
\end{tabular}
\caption{Quantum numbers for the bottom--type VL multiplets (up to
triplets), explicitly indicating weak isospin, hypercharge, electric charge ($Q_{EM}$) and if a direct Yukawa coupling to SM quarks is allowed.}
\label{QN_vec-bottom}
\end{center}
\end{table}
\begin{table}[tp]
\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{| l | c | c | c | c | c |} \hline
Multiplet & $\psi$ & $(SU(2)_{L},U(1)_{Y})$ &
$T_{3}$ & $Q_{EM}$ & Yukawa to SM \\ \hline
Doublet 1/6 & $\left(\begin{array}{c}U \\ D \end{array}\right)$ &
$({\bf 2},1/6)$
& $\begin{array}{c}+ 1/2 \\ -1/2 \end{array}$ &
$\begin{array}{c}+ 2/3 \\ - 1/3 \end{array}$ & Yes$^\ast$
\\ \hline
Triplet 2/3 & $\left(\begin{array}{c}X^{5/3} \\ U \\ D \end{array}
\right)$ & $({\bf 3},2/3)$ & $\begin{array}{c}+1 \\ 0 \\ -1
\end{array}$ & $\begin{array}{c}+5/3 \\ +2/3 \\ -1/3 \end{array} $ & Yes
\\ \hline
Triplet -1/3 &
$\left(\begin{array}{c}U \\ D \\ Y^{-4/3} \end{array}\right)$ &
$({\bf 3},-1/3)$ & $\begin{array}{c}+1 \\ 0 \\ -1 \end{array}$ &
$\begin{array}{c} +2/3 \\ -1/3 \\ -4/3 \end{array} $ & Yes
\\ \hline
Quadruplet 7/6 & $\left(\begin{array}{c}X^{8/3} \\ X^{5/3} \\ U \\ D
\end{array}\right)$ & $({\bf 4},7/6)$ & $\begin{array}{c}+3/2 \\
+1/2 \\ -1/2 \\ -3/2 \end{array}$ & $\begin{array}{c} +8/3 \\ +5/3
\\ +2/3 \\ -1/3 \end{array} $ & No \\ \hline
Quadruplet 1/6 &$ \left(\begin{array}{c}X^{5/3} \\ U \\ D \\ Y^{-4/3}
\end{array} \right)$ & $({\bf 4},1/6)$ & $\begin{array}{c}+3/2 \\
+1/2 \\ -1/2 \\ -3/2 \end{array}$ & $\begin{array}{c}+5/3 \\ +2/3 \\
-1/3 \\ -4/3 \end{array}$ & No \\ \hline
Quadruplet - 5/6 &$ \left( \begin{array}{c}U \\D
\\Y^{-4/3}\\Y^{-7/3}\end{array}\right)$ & $({\bf 4},-5/6)$ &
$\begin{array}{c}+3/2 \\ +1/2 \\ -1/2 \\ -3/2 \end{array}$ &
$\begin{array}{c}+2/3 \\ -1/3\\-4/3\\-7/3\end{array}$ & No \\ \hline
\end{tabular}
\caption{Quantum numbers for the mixed--type VL fermion multiplets (up
to quadruplets), explicitly indicating weak isospin, hypercharge,
electric charge ($Q_{EM}$) and if a direct Yukawa coupling to SM
quarks is allowed. For the Doublet 1/6, one can write an independent
Yukawa coupling with the right-handed up and down quarks.}
\label{QN_vec-mixed}
\end{center}
\end{table}
\section{New Yukawa couplings}
\label{sec:yukawa}
The SM Yukawa couplings are the coefficients $y_u^{i,j}$ and
$y_d^{i,j}$, where $u$ and $d$ refer to the coupling of the up-type
and down-type quarks respectively and the indices $i$ and $j$ label
the three SM generations ($i,j = 1,2,3$). These couplings allow
the interactions of the SM quarks with the Higgs bosons according to
the following Lagrangian terms:
\begin{equation}
\mathcal{L}_{SM} = - y_u^{i,j}\, \bar{Q}_L^i \tilde{H} u_R^j -
y_d^{i,j}\, \bar{Q}_L^i H d_R^j + h.c. \,,
\label{eq:3:1}
\end{equation}
where $H=({\bf 2},1/2)$ is the Higgs boson doublet coupling to down-type quarks, $\tilde{H}= i \tau^2 H^*$ is the same Higgs
multiplet coupling to up-type quarks, $Q_L=({\bf 2},\frac{1}{6})$ is the SM quark doublet, $u_R = ({\bf 1}, \frac{2}{3})$ and
$d_R = ({\bf 1}, -\frac{1}{3})$ are the SM singlets. After the Higgs boson gets its Vacuum Expectation Value (VEV) we obtain:
\begin{equation}
\mathcal{L}_{SM} = - \left(\tilde{m}^{up}\right)^{ij} \, \bar{u}_L^i
u_R^j - \left(\tilde{m}^{down}\right)^{ij} \, \bar{d}_L^i d_R^j +
h.c. \,;
\label{eq:3:2}
\end{equation}
where $\tilde{m}^{up}$ and $\tilde{m}^{down}$ are the SM up-type and down-type $3 \times 3$ mass matrices for quarks.
In the following of the paper, we will work in the basis where the SM Yukawas are diagonal and the eigenvalues are real and positive.
This implies that the phases of the SM quark fields are fixed (up to an overall phase -- the Baryon number), and that a mixing matrix
$\tilde{V}_{\rm CKM}$ appears in the couplings of the SM quark fields to the $W$ boson. We anticipate that this mixing matrix is not the
measured CKM matrix, because of the effect of mixing to the VL quarks.
The presence of VL multiplets allows us to add Yukawa interactions between the VL multiplets and the SM quarks.
Due to $SU(2)$ products of representations, new quark doublets can couple with the SM right-handed singlets,
while new quark singlets and triplets can couple to SM left-handed doublets.
However, as we are considering a more general case in which more than one VL multiplet is present, new
Yukawa interactions between two VL quark multiplets and the SM Higgs doublet appear. \\
In the following we will not considered two multiplets of same type (same hypercharge).
As we are interested in the interplay of VL quarks, we have considered cases that satisfy the
following conditions:
\begin{itemize}
\item{} there must be two VL top quarks.
\item{} eventual VL bottom quarks do not mix with SM bottom sector, {\sl i.e.}
we can take the mixing to be zero without affecting the top sector,
to ensure that the model is not constrained too much by the stringent flavour
physics and $Zbb$ coupling bounds from the bottom sector.
\end{itemize}
The latter conditions tells us that the only multiplet containing a bottom quark that we allow is the Doublet--1/6, for which the Yukawa involving the down sector is independent form the Yukawa involving the up sector.
These conditions leave us with only four multiplet combinations,
namely:
\begin{itemize}
\item{} Singlet ($Y = 2/3$) + Doublet ($Y = 7/6$);
\item{} Doublet ($Y=7/6$) + Triplet ($Y=5/3$);
\item{} Singlet ($Y = 2/3$) + Doublet ($Y = 1/6$);
\item{} Doublet ($Y = 1/6$) + Doublet ($Y = 7/6$).
\end{itemize}
The analytical expressions of the mass matrices for the above combinations will be derived in the following.
For the remaining cases with two different VL multiplets, the mass matrices are presented in Appendix \ref{appendix:A}. \\
The notation we will use to refer to the new Yukawa and mass terms in the Lagrangian is
the following:
\begin{itemize}
\item{} $\mathcal{L}_{V-SM}$: Yukawa interactions between a VL multiplet and SM quarks;
\item{} $\mathcal{L}_{V-V}$: Yukawa interactions between two VL multiplets;
\item{} $\mathcal{L}_{\rm mass}$: mass terms after the Higgs boson acquires its VEV and pure VL mass terms.
\end{itemize}
We will also denote the non-SM Yukawa couplings as:
\begin{itemize}
\item{} $\lambda_I^k$: Yukawa between the VL quark $I=1,2$ with the SM quark of generation $k$;
\item{} $\lambda_{Id}^k$: Yukawa coupling of the Doublet--1/6 with the right handed bottom (this coupling will be assumed to be very small in our analysis);
\item{} $\xi_1$: Yukawa between two VL quarks, involving a left-handed doublet (or quadruplet) and a right-handed singlet (or triplet);
\item{} $\xi_2$: Yukawa between two VL quarks, involving a left-handed singlet (or triplet) and a right-handed doublet (or quadruplet).
\end{itemize}
After the Higgs develops its VEV, $\langle H \rangle = \frac{v}{\sqrt{2}} \left(0, 1\right)^T$, these terms will generate mass terms mixing the VL quarks among themselves and with the SM quarks.
In the mass matrices we will consistently use the following notation:
\begin{itemize}
\item{} $y_I^k = \lambda_I^k \frac{v}{\sqrt{2}}$, when the mixing involves a VL doublet (or quadruplet);
\item{} $x_I^k = \lambda_I^k \frac{v}{\sqrt{2}}$, when the mixing involves a VL singlet (or triplet);
\item{} $y_{Id}^k = \lambda_{Id}^k \frac{v}{\sqrt{2}}$, when the mixing involves a VL doublet (or quadruplet) of down type quark;
\item{} $x_{Id}^k = \lambda_{Id}^k \frac{v}{\sqrt{2}}$, when the mixing involves a VL singlet (or triplet) of down type quark;
\item{} $\omega = \xi_1 \frac{v}{\sqrt{2}}$ and $\omega' = \xi_2 \frac{v}{\sqrt{2}}$, for the mixing among VL multiplets.
\end{itemize}
Note that for VL multiplets with the same quantum numbers as the SM quarks, a direct mass mixing can be written down: however, this
term is not physical, as it can be easily removed by redefining the fields corresponding to the SM and VL quarks. In the following, therefore,
we will never consider this term in the Lagrangians. Finally, all the new Yukawa couplings are potentially complex couplings: for each case, we will
specify the number of physical phases, recalling that we chose to work in the basis where the SM Yukwas are real, positive and diagonal (thus 3
mixing angles and one phase are already accounted for in $\tilde{V}_{\rm CKM}$). We also chose the VL masses to be real and positive, thus fixing
the relative phase between the left and right-handed components of the VL quarks.
\subsection{Singlet $Y=2/3$ and Doublet $Y=7/6$} \label{sec:yukawa:1}
The Doublet $Y=7/6$ couples to Singlets $Y=2/3$ (both SM and VL):
\begin{eqnarray}
\mathcal{L}_{V-SM} &=& - \lambda_{1}^k\, \bar{\psi}_{1L} H u_R^k -
\lambda_2^k \bar{Q}_L \tilde{H} \psi_{2R} + h.c. \,, \label{eq:3:4} \\
\mathcal{L}_{V-V} &=& - \xi_{1} \, \bar{\psi}_{1L} H \psi_{2R} -
\xi_{2}\, \bar{\psi}_{1R} H \psi_{2L}+ h.c. \,, \label{eq:3:5}
\end{eqnarray}
where $\psi_{1}=({\bf 2},\frac{7}{6})=\left(X_1^{5/3} \ U_1\right)^T$ and $\psi_{2}=({\bf 1},\frac{2}{3})=U_2$.
In this Lagrangian, we can use the relative phases between the two VL quarks to fix $\xi_1 > 0$, so that $\xi_{2}$ contains one physical phase.
The relative phase between the VL and the SM quarks can be used to fix one of the 6 phases contained in $\lambda_{1,2}^k$. In total,
the model has 6 additional phases to the SM ones, when all new Yukawas are non-vanishing. The mass Lagrangian is:
\begin{eqnarray}
\mathcal{L}_{\rm mass} &=& - y_1^k \bar{U}_{1L} u_R^k - x_2^k u_L^k
U_{2R} - \omega \bar{U}_{1L} U_{2R} - {\omega'} \bar{U}_{1R} U_{2L}
- M_1 \, \bar{U}_{1L} U_{1R} \nonumber \\
&& - M_2 \, \bar{U}_{2L} U_{2R} - M_1 \, \bar{X}_{1L}^{5/3} X_{1R}^{5/3} + h.c. \,.
\label{eq:3:6}
\end{eqnarray}
This leads to the mass matrix:
\begin{equation}
M_u = \left( \begin{array}{ccc}
\left(\tilde{m}^{up}\right)_{3\times 3} & 0_{3 \times 1} &
\left(x_2^k\right)_{3 \times 1} \\
\left(y_1^k\right)_{1 \times 3} & M_1 & \omega \\
0_{1 \times 3} & \omega' & M_2
\end{array} \right), \quad
M_{X_1^{5/3}} = M_1 \,,
\label{eq:3:7}
\end{equation}
where $\tilde{m}^{up}$ is the SM $3 \times 3$ mass matrix of up sector. The mass matrix can be diagonalised by two unitarity matrices:
\begin{equation}
M_u = V_L^u \cdot M_u^{diag} \cdot (V^u_R)^\dagger\,.
\label{eq:3:8}
\end{equation}
The general procedure for the diagonalisation of mass matrices is described in Section \ref{sec:massmatrices}.
\subsection{Doublet $Y=7/6$ and Triplet $Y=5/3$ }
\label{sec:yukawa:2}
The Triplet $Y=5/3$ couples to the Doublet $Y=7/6$, which in
turn couples to the SM singlet $u_R$:
\begin{eqnarray}
\mathcal{L}_{V-SM} &=& - \lambda_1^k \, \bar{\psi}_{1L} H u^{k}_{R}
+ h.c. \,, \label{eq:3:9} \\
\mathcal{L}_{V-V} &=& - \xi_1 \, \bar{\psi}_{1L} \tau^a \tilde{H}
(\psi_{2R})^a - \xi_2 \, \bar{\psi}_{1R} \tau^a \tilde{H}
(\psi_{2L})^a + h.c. \,,
\label{eq:3:10}
\end{eqnarray}
where $\psi_1 =({\bf 2},\frac{7}{6})=\left(X^{5/3}_1 \ U_1\right)^T$ and $\psi_2
=({\bf 3},\frac{5}{3})=\left(X^{8/3}_2 \ X^{5/3}_2 \ U_2\right)^T$.
We can again use the relative phase between VL quarks to fix $\xi_1>0$ (and leave $\xi_2$ complex), and remove one of the 3 phases of $\lambda_1^k$, thus the model contains 3 additional physical phases.
The mass
contributions from the Yukawa interactions, including the VL masses, give the Lagrangian:
\begin{eqnarray}
\mathcal{L}_{\rm mass} &=& - y_1^k \bar{U}_{1L} u_R^k
- \sqrt{2} \, \omega \bar{U}_{1L} U_{2R} - \omega \bar{X}^{5/3}_{1L}
X^{5/3}_{2R} - \sqrt{2} \, {\omega'} \bar{U}_{1R} U_{2L} - {\omega'}
\bar{X}^{5/3}_{1R} X^{5/3}_{2L} - M_1 \, \bar{U}_{1L} U_{1R}
\nonumber \\
&& - M_1 \, \bar{X}^{5/3}_{1L} X^{5/3}_{1R} - M_2 \, \bar{U}_{2L}
U_{2R} - M_2 \, \bar{X}^{5/3}_{2L} X^{5/3}_{2R} - M_2 \,
\bar{X}^{8/3}_{2L} X^{8/3}_{2R} + h.c. \,,
\label{eq:3:11}
\end{eqnarray}
leading to the mass matrices:
\begin{equation}
M_u = \left( \begin{array}{ccc}
\left(\tilde{m}^{up}\right)_{3\times 3} & 0_{3 \times 1} & 0_{3 \times
1} \\
\left(y_1^k\right)_{1 \times 3} & M_1 & \sqrt{2} \, \omega \\
0_{1 \times 3} & \sqrt{2} \, \omega' & M_2
\end{array} \right), \quad
M_{X^{5/3}} = \left( \begin{array}{cc}
M_1 & \omega \\
{\omega}' & M_2
\end{array} \right)
, \quad
M_{X^{8/3}} = M_2\,.
\label{eq:3:12}
\end{equation}
Note that the mass matrix in the up sector is the same as the previous case (with $x_2 = 0$), while now there are two exotic charged
quarks which mix via the Yukawa couplings $\xi_{1,2}$.
\subsection{Singlet $Y=2/3$ and Doublet $Y=1/6$}
\label{sec:yukawa:3}
In this case, the two VL multiplets have the same quantum numbers of the SM quarks, therefore one can replicate all the standard Yukawa
couplings, including an independent coupling for the right-handed downs $d_R$:
\begin{eqnarray}
\mathcal{L}_{V-SM} &=&
- \lambda_{1}^k\, \bar{\psi}_{1L} \tilde{H} u_R^k -
\lambda_{1d}^k\, \bar{\psi}_{1L} H d_R^k - \lambda_2^k
\bar{Q}^k_L \tilde{H} \psi_{2R} + h.c. \,, \label{eq:3:13}\\
\mathcal{L}_{V-V} &=& - \xi_1\, \bar{\psi}_{1L} \tilde{H} \psi_{2R}
- \xi_{2}\,\bar{\psi}_{1R} \tilde{H} \psi_{2L} + h.c. \,,
\label{eq:3:14}
\end{eqnarray}
where $\psi_1 =({\bf 2},\frac{1}{6})=\left(U_1 \ D_1\right)^T$ and $\psi_2 =
({\bf 1},\frac{2}{3}) = U_2$.
Like in the cases above, we can use the relative phases of the VL quarks to make $\xi_1>0$, and remove one of the 6 phases in $\lambda_{1,2}^k$.
The bottom coupling $\lambda_{1d}^k$ are also complex, however as explained above we will set these couplings to zero in the following. The mass
terms take the form (where we normalise the mass parameters to have coefficient one for the top partners):
\begin{eqnarray}
\mathcal{L}_{\rm mass} &=&
- y_{1}^k \bar{U}_{1L} u_R^k
- x_2^k u_L^k
U_{2R} - \omega \bar{U}_{1L} U_{2R} - \omega' \bar{U}_{2L} U_{1R}
\nonumber \\
&& - M_1 \, \bar{U}_{1L} U_{1R} - M_2 \, \bar{U}_{2L} U_{2R} - M_1
\, \bar{D}_{1L} D_{1R} + h.c. \,.
\label{eq:3:15}
\end{eqnarray}
The mass matrices, therefore, read:
\begin{equation}
M_u = \left( \begin{array}{c c c}
\left(\tilde{m}^{up}\right)_{3\times 3} & 0_{3 \times 1} &
(x_2^k)_{3\times 1} \\
(y_{1}^k)_{1\times 3} & M_1 & \omega \\
0_{1\times3} & \omega' & M_2
\end{array} \right), \quad
M_d = \left( \begin{array}{cc}
\left(\tilde{m}^{down}\right)_{3\times 3} & 0_{1 \times 3} \\
(0)_{3\times 1} & M_1
\end{array} \right)\,.
\label{eq:3:16}
\end{equation}
Now, the mass matrix in the up sector is the same as the first case, while the down sector mass matrix is diagonal (as we set to zero
the mixing in the down sector). No exotic charges are present in this case.
\subsection{Doublet $Y=1/6$ and Doublet $Y=7/6$}
\label{sec:yukawa:4}
This is the only case where we consider two doublets, thus both VL multiplets only couple to the right-handed SM quarks:
\begin{eqnarray}
\mathcal{L}_{V-SM} &=&
- \lambda_{1}^k\, \bar{\psi}_{1L} \tilde{H} u_R^k -
\lambda_{1d}^k\, \bar{\psi}_{1L} H d_R^k - \lambda_2^k \,
\bar{\psi}_{2L} H u_R^k + h.c. \,, \label{eq:3:17}
\end{eqnarray}
where $\psi_1 =({\bf 2},\frac{1}{6})=\left(U_1 \ D_1\right)^T$ and $\psi_2 =
({\bf 2},\frac{7}{6}) = \left(X_2^{5/3} \ U_2\right)^T$.
In this case, no Yukawa coupling between the two VL multiplet is allowed, therefore one can use the two free phases to remove one phase in
$\lambda_1^k$ and one in $\lambda_2^k$, so that only 4 new phases are present in this model. Once again, we will set $\lambda_{1d}^k = 0$.
The mass Lagrangian and mass matrices become:
\begin{eqnarray}
\mathcal{L}_{\rm mass} &=&
- y_{1u}^k \bar{U}_{1L} u_R^k - y_{1d}^k \bar{D}_{1L} d_R^k - y_2^k
U_{2L} u^k_R \nonumber \\
&& - M_1 \, \bar{U}_{1L} U_{1R} - M_1 \, \bar{D}_{1L} D_{1R} - M_2
\, \bar{U}_{2L} U_{2R} - M_2 \, \bar{X}^{5/3}_{2L} X^{5/3}_{2R} + h.c. \,,
\label{eq:3:18}
\end{eqnarray}
and
\begin{equation}
M_u = \left( \begin{array}{c c c}
\left(\tilde{m}^{up}\right)_{3\times 3} & 0_{3 \times 1} &
0_{3\times1} \\
(y_{1}^k)_{1\times 3} & M_1 & 0 \\
(y_2^k)_{1 \times 3} & 0 & M_2
\end{array} \right), \quad
M_d = \left( \begin{array}{c c }
\left(\tilde{m}^{down}\right)_{3\times 3} & 0_{3\times 1} \\
(0)_{1\times 3} & M_2 \\
\end{array} \right), \quad
M_{X^{5/3}} = M_2 \,. \label{eq:3:19}
\end{equation}
The structure of the up-sector mass matrix is now different from the cases above.
\subsection{Diagonalisation of the mass matrices}
\label{sec:massmatrices}
We have discussed so far four special cases, where two top partners mix with the up-sector giving rise to $5\times 5$ mass matrices,
while the down sector is always diagonal. More general cases, and the form of the mixing matrices, can be found in Appendix \ref{appendix:A}.
In the up sector, the mass matrices can be diagonalised by two unitary $5\times 5$ matrices:
\begin{equation}
M_{u} = V_L \cdot M_{u}^{diag} \cdot V^{\dagger}_R\,,
\label{eq:4:7}
\end{equation}
with:
\begin{equation}
M_{u}^{diag} = \left( \begin{array}{ccccc}
m_{u} & & & & \\ & m_{c} & & & \\ & & m_{t} & & \\ & & &
m_{t'_1} & \\ & & & & m_{t'_2}
\end{array} \right) \,. \label{eq:4:8}
\end{equation}
Indeed when two VL multiplet are present at the same time,
there are three types of mixing structures which can
arise with the SM up quarks:
\begin{itemize}
\item{Case A:} two semi-integer isospin multiplets (as doublets, quadruplets, etc.). In this case the mass matrix becomes:
\begin{equation}
M_{u}^{(A)} =
\left(
\begin{array}{ccccc}
\tilde{m}_{u} & & & 0 & 0 \\
& \tilde{m}_{c} & & 0 & 0 \\
& & \tilde{m}_{t} & 0 & 0 \\
y_1^1 & y_1^2 & y_1^3 & M_{1} & 0 \\
y_2^1 & y_2^2 & y_2^3 & 0 & M_{2} \\
\end{array} \label{eq:4:9}
\right) \,;
\end{equation}
\item{Case B:} two integer isospin multiplets (as singlets, triplets, etc.). The mass matrix is:
\begin{equation}
M_{u}^{(B)} =
\left(
\begin{array}{ccccc}
\tilde{m}_{u} & & & x^1_1 & x^1_2 \\
& \tilde{m}_{c} & & x^2_1 & x^2_2 \\
& & \tilde{m}_{t} & x^3_1 & x^3_2 \\
0 & 0 & 0 & M_{1} & 0 \\
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & M_{2} \\
\end{array}
\right) \,; \label{eq:4:10}
\end{equation}
\item{Case C:} one semi-integer isospin multiplet and one integer isospin multiplet. The mass matrix is:
\begin{equation}
M_{u}^{(C)} =
\left(
\begin{array}{ccccc}
\tilde{m}_{u} & & & 0 & x_2^1 \\
& \tilde{m}_{c} & & 0 & x_2^{2} \\
& & \tilde{m}_{t} & 0 & x_2^{3} \\
y_1^{1} & y_1^{2} & y_1^{3} & M_{1} & \omega \\
0 & 0 & 0 & \omega' & M_{2} \\
\end{array}
\right) \,. \label{eq:4:11}
\end{equation}
\end{itemize}
The VL multiplets considered in our analysis belong to the cases indicated in Table \ref{tab:ABC}, where the combinations we are
considering for our numerical analysis have been highlighted. These mass matrices cannot be diagonalised analytically. One can obtain
approximate results in the limit where the VL masses $M_{1,2}$ are much larger than the contribution from the Yukawa couplings, and general
results can be found in the Appendix of Ref.~\cite{Buchkremer:2013bha}. In our numerical results, however, we will use a numerical procedure
to find the correct mass eigenstates and mixing angles, detailed in the next subsection.
\begin{table}[htp]
\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{c|c|c|c|c}
2nd $\downarrow$ \hspace*{0.2cm} 1st $\rightarrow$ & Singlet $Y=\frac{2}{3}$ & Doublet
$Y=\frac{1}{6}$ & Doublet $Y=\frac{7}{6}$ & Triplet $Y=\frac{5}{3}$ \\ \hline
Singlet $Y=\frac{2}{3}$ & case B & \bf case C & \bf case C & case B \\ \hline
Doublet $Y=\frac{1}{6}$ & & case A & \bf case A & case C \\ \hline
Doublet $Y=\frac{7}{6}$ & & & case A & \bf case C \\ \hline
Triplet $Y=\frac{5}{3}$ & & & & case B \\
\end{tabular}
\caption{
Mixing structures for the VL quarks multiplets considered in our analysis. The combinations we have studied in detail are in bold.}
\label{tab:ABC}
\end{center}
\end{table}
Some models also contain two exotic quarks which mix via a $2 \times 2$ matrix, like in Section~\ref{sec:yukawa:2}:
\begin{equation} \label{eq:massX2/3}
M_{X^{5/3}} = \left( \begin{array}{cc}
M_1 & \omega \\
{\omega}' & M_2
\end{array} \right)\,.
\end{equation}
This mass matrix can be diagonalised by two Unitary matrices
\begin{equation}
M_{X} = V_{XL} \cdot M_X^{diag} \cdot V^{\dagger}_{XR}\,,
\end{equation}
with eigenvalues
\begin{equation}
M_{X_{1,2}}^2 = \frac{1}{2} \left( M_1^2 + M_2^2 + \omega^2 + |\omega'|^2 \mp \sqrt{(M_1^2 + M_2^2 + \omega^2 + |\omega'|^2)^2 - 4 |M_1 M_2 - \omega \omega'|^2} \right)\,.
\end{equation}
Parametrising the mixing matrices as
\begin{equation}
V_{XL/R} = \left( \begin{array}{cc}
\cos \alpha_{L/R} & e^{i \delta_{L/R}} \sin \alpha_{L/R} \\
- e^{- i \delta_{L/R}} \sin \alpha_{L/R} & \cos \alpha_{L/R}
\end{array} \right)\,;
\end{equation}
the mixing angles and phases can be expressed as
\begin{equation} \label{eq:anglesX2/3}
e^{- i \delta_L} \sin (2 \alpha_L) = 2 \frac{M_1 \omega' + M_2 \omega}{M_{X_2}^2 - M_{X_1}^2}\,, \quad e^{- i \delta_R} \sin (2 \alpha_R) = 2 \frac{M_1 \omega + M_2 \omega'}{M_{X_2}^2 - M_{X_1}^2}\,.
\end{equation}
\subsubsection{Numerical procedure}
\label{sec:numerics}
In order to evaluate the constraints and estimate the production cross-sections of VL quarks at colliders we need to write the
Lagrangians presented in Section \ref{sec:yukawa:1}--\ref{sec:yukawa:4} in the mass basis. In the SM the physical masses of
quarks are uniquely defined by Yukawa couplings. The introduction of VL quarks with couplings to
all the three SM quark generations enlarges the mass matrices and results in variation of the physical masses of SM quarks.
In Section \ref{sec:massmatrices} we have presented the structure of the $5 \times 5$ mass matrices in the gauge basis.
The procedure we have adopted for diagonalisation is the following:
\begin{itemize}
\item{\bf Step 1:} using the new Yukawa Couplings ($x_i, y_i, \omega,
\omega'$) and the masses $M_1, M_2$ as input parameters
we write the five eigenvalue equations (one for each of the physical quarks):
\begin{equation}
| M_{u}^\dagger M_{u} - \lambda_i I | = 0 \,,
\label{eqn:5:1}
\end{equation}
where $M_{u}$ are the mass matrices and $\lambda_i$ are the eigenvalues (square of physical masses).
\item{\bf Step 2:} the first three equations correspond to the three
known values of SM quark physical masses ($m_{u}, m_{c},
m_{t}$). We solve these equations for the three SM Yukawa couplings, namely
$\tilde{m}_{u}, \tilde{m}_{c}, \tilde{m}_{t}$.
\item{\bf Step 3:} we insert the SM Yukawa couplings obtained in Step 2
into the mass matrices and diagonalize them again to get the mixing matrices
($V_L^{u}$ and $V_R^{u}$) and the physical masses of the VL
quarks.
\end{itemize}
In this process we only consider positive solution for the SM Yukawa couplings (Step 2), to be consistent with our original choice.
For simplicity, we also set all the new physical phases to zero, allowing ourselves only a negative sign of the Yukawa couplings
when physically inequivalent to the positive sign.
\section{Tree-level and Electroweak Precision bounds}
\label{sec:bounds}
\subsection{Tree-level bounds on VL quarks}
\label{sec:bounds:1}
In order to study the tree-level bounds we need to recall the couplings of the VL fermions to the gauge bosons and in
particular to the Z boson. The complete structure is given in the appendix \ref{appendix:B}. The mass matrices are diagonalised as follows:
\begin{equation}
M_{u} = V_L \cdot M_{u}^{diag}\cdot V_R^\dagger \,,
\label{eq:6:1}
\end{equation}
so that the mass eigenstates are defined as:
\begin{equation}
\left( \begin{array}{c}
u \\ c \\ t \\ t'_1 \\ t'_2
\end{array} \right)_{L/R} = V^\dagger_{L/R} \cdot \left( \begin{array}{c}
u^1 \\ u^2 \\ u^3 \\ U_1 \\ U_2
\end{array} \right)_{L/R} \,. \label{eq:6:2}
\end{equation}
In the mass eigenstate basis, the couplings of the $Z$ boson read (for the up-quarks):
\begin{eqnarray}
g_{ZL}^{IJ} &=& \frac{g}{2 \cos \theta_W} \left[ \left( 1 -
\frac{4}{3} \sin^2 \theta_W \right) \delta^{IJ} +
\sum_{K=4,5} (2 T_3^{(K)} - 1) V_{L}^{\ast,KI} V_L^{KJ} \right],
\label{eq:6:3} \\
g_{ZR}^{IJ} &=& \frac{g}{2 \cos \theta_W} \left[ \left(- \frac{4}{3}
\sin^2 \theta_W \right) \delta^{IJ} + \sum_{K=4,5} 2 T_3^{(K)}
V_{R}^{\ast,KI} V_R^{KJ} \right]\,, \label{eq:6:4}
\end{eqnarray}
where $T_3^{(K)}$ is the weak isospin of the VL quark $K$.
Note that the modifications to the couplings with respect to the SM values (including off-diagonal terms) are all proportional to
the $V_{L/R}^{4I}$ and the $V_{L/R}^{5I}$ elements of the mixing matrices. Let's now consider the bounds applied generation by
generation.
\subsubsection{Bounds on the first generation}
\label{sec:bounds::1:1}
\subsubsection*{Atomic Parity Violation}
The weak charge of a nucleus can be, in general, written as
\cite{Deandrea:1997wk}:
\begin{equation}
Q_W = (2 Z + N) (\tilde{g}_{ZL}^u + \tilde{g}_{ZR}^u) +
(Z+2N)(\tilde{g}_{ZL}^d + \tilde{g}_{ZR}^d) \,, \label{eq:6:5}
\end{equation}
where $g_Z = \frac{g}{2 \cos \theta_W} \tilde{g}_Z$.
In our case:
\begin{equation}
\delta Q_W = (2 Z + N) \sum_{K=4,5} \left((2 T_3^{(K)} - 1)
|V_L^{K1}|^2 + 2 T_3^{(K)} |V_R^{K1} |^2\right) \,. \label{eq:6:6}
\end{equation}
The strongest bound is for Cesium, for which $2Z+N = 188$, and
\cite{Agashe:2014kda}:
\begin{equation}
\left. Q_W\right|_{\rm exp.} = -73.20 \pm 0.35\,, \qquad \left. Q_W
\right|_{SM} = -73.15 \pm 0.02 \,. \label{eq:6:7}
\end{equation}
Neglecting the theoretical error on the SM value, which is rather small:
\begin{equation}
\delta Q_W = - 0.05 \pm 0.35\,. \label{eq:6:8}
\end{equation}
\subsubsection{Bounds on the second generation}
\label{sec:bounds:1:2}
\subsubsection*{$Z$-couplings measured at LEP}
The couplings of the charm have been well measured at
LEP~\cite{ALEPH:2005ab}:
\begin{equation}
g_{ZL}^c = 0.3453 \pm 0.0036\,, \quad g_{ZR}^c = - 0.1580 \pm
0.0051\,, \quad \mbox{correlation} = 0.30 \,. \label{eq:6:9}
\end{equation}
One can use this input to reconstruct a $\chi^2$ distribution, and set bounds on the mixing angles: the most conservative approach is to
assume that the central values correspond to the SM prediction, therefore any deviation must be smaller than the quoted errors. The
$\chi^2$ can be constructed as follows:
\begin{equation}
\chi^2 = \sum_{i,j=1,2} \delta g^i (V^{-1})^{ij} \delta g^j\,,
\label{eq:6:10}
\end{equation}
where $\delta g$ are the deviations in the two couplings (left and right handed) and:
\begin{equation}
V^{ij} = \rho^{ij} \sigma^i \sigma^j\,, \quad \mbox{where} \quad \rho
= \left( \begin{array}{cc}
1 &0.30 \\ 0.30 & 1 \end{array} \right) \,, \label{eq:6:11}
\end{equation}
and $\sigma^j$ are the errors. In the plots below, we will draw confidence levels at 68\% ($\chi^2 = 2.30$ for 3 degrees of freedom),
95\% ($5.99$) and 99\% (9.21).
\subsubsection{Bounds on the third generation}
\label{sec:bounds:1:3}
\subsubsection*{$W_{tb}$ couplings measured at TeVatron and LHC}
As there is no mixing in the bottom sector, the value of $V_{tb}$ is affected only by the mixing of the top with the VL quarks in the
left-handed sector:
\begin{equation}
|V_{tb}|^2 = 1-\sum_{K=4,5} |V_L^{K3}|^2\,. \label{eq:6:12}
\end{equation}
A list of up-to-date direct measurements and lower bounds on $V_{tb}$ can be found here~\cite{Chiarelli:2013psr}. The strongest bound is
from a CMS measurements of single top cross sections at 7 TeV~\cite{Chatrchyan:2012ep}, which gives
$|V_{tb}| > 0.92$ at 95\% CL. We will use this limit to define the allowed region, even though all
other searches, including Tevatron \cite{Aaltonen:2014ura}, CMS \cite{Khachatryan:2014iya} and ATLAS \cite{Friedrich:2014eqa} at 8 TeV, have
bounds $|V_{tb}| > 0.80$ at 95\% CL (see also \cite{Lista:2014kza,Moon:2014cea} for summaries of the most recent results).
\subsection{Oblique corrections}
\label{sec:bounds:2}
In the following we analyse the impact of the interplay of two VL multiplets with the complete three SM generations in order to
establish bounds from the electroweak precision tests (EPW) in term of the oblique corrections. These bounds will be compared with those
coming from tree-level observables. In order to parameterise the effect of the loop correction we will use the Peskin-Takeuchi
$S$, $T$ and $U$ parameters, defined as~\cite{Peskin:1990zt,Peskin:1991sw}:
\begin{eqnarray}
S &=& 16\pi \left[ \Pi_{33}^{\prime}(0) - \Pi_{3Q}^{\prime}(0) \right]
\,, \label{eq:7:1} \\
T &=& \frac{4\pi}{s_{W}^{2}c_{W}^{2}m_{Z}^{2}} \left[ \Pi_{11}(0) -
\Pi_{33}(0) \right] \,, \label{eq:7:2} \\
U &=& 16\pi \left[ \Pi_{11}^{\prime}(0) - \Pi_{33}^{\prime}(0) \right] \,.
\label{eq:7:3}
\end{eqnarray}
where $\Pi_{ij}$ are the scalar two point functions, related to the $W$, $Z$, and $A$ one--loop two point functions by:
\begin{eqnarray}
\Pi_{AA} &=& e^{2}\Pi_{QQ} \,, \label{eq:7:4} \\
\Pi_{ZA} &=& \frac{e^{2}}{s_{W}c_{W}}\left( \Pi_{3Q} - s_{W}^{2}
\Pi_{QQ} \right) \,, \label{eq:7:5} \\
\Pi_{ZZ} &=& \frac{e^{2}}{s_{W}^{2}c_{W}^{2}} \left( \Pi_{33}
-2s_{W}^{2}\Pi_{3Q} + s_{W}^{4}\Pi_{QQ} \right) \,, \label{eq:7:6} \\
\Pi_{WW} &=& \frac{e^{2}}{s_{W}^{2}} \Pi_{11} \,. \label{eq:7:7}
\end{eqnarray}
For this work we have taken the SM reference point masses to be $m_{h, {\rm ref}}=126$ GeV, $m_{t,{\rm ref}}=173$ GeV and
$m_{b,{\rm ref}} = 4.2$ GeV. If $\hat{S}_{VL}$ and $\hat{T}_{VL}$ is the contribution of the model (including VL quarks) to the S
and T parameters then the deviations can be defined as \cite{Lavoura:1992np}:
\begin{eqnarray}
S = \hat{S}_{VL} - \hat{S}_{SM} \,, \quad
T = \hat{T}_{VL} - \hat{T}_{SM} \,,
\end{eqnarray}
where the SM reference values, $\hat{S}_{SM}$ and $\hat{T}_{SM}$, can be approximated as:
\begin{eqnarray}
\hat{S}_{SM} &\simeq& \frac{N_{c}}{6\pi} \left[ 3 - \frac{1}{3} \ln
\left( \frac{m_{t}^{2}}{m_{b}^{2}} \right) \right] \,,
\label{eq:7:8} \\
\hat{T}_{SM} &\simeq& \frac{N_{c}}{16\pi s_{W}^{2}c_{W}^{2}m_{Z}^{2}}
\left[ m_{t}^{2} + m_{b}^{2} - \frac{2m_{t}^{2}m_{b}^{2}}
{m_{t}^{2}-m_{b}^{2}} \ln \left( \frac{m_{t}^{2}}{m_{b}^{2}} \right)
\right] \,. \label{eq:7:9}
\end{eqnarray}
By fixing $U=0$, the experimental results for the $S$ and $T$ parameters are given by~\cite{Baak:2011ze,Baak:2012kk}:
\begin{equation}
S= 0.05 \pm 0.09 \,, \qquad T= 0.08 \pm 0.07 \,, \label{eq:7:10}
\end{equation}
where the correlation between $S$ and $T$ in this fit is
$\rho_{ST}=0.91$.
If VL multiplets are present in the physical spectrum, the $\Pi_{ij}$ two-point functions get extra contributions
from the new particles circulating in the loops. Obviously if other particles than the VL quarks are present in a specific
model of new physics, they may also contribute. Therefore the bounds obtained from the $S$ and $T$ parameters should be taken with this restriction in
mind. The detailed formulas for the contributions of the VL particles to the $S$ and $T$ parameters are given in Appendix \ref{appendix:C}. In the
numerical study we have combined the tree-level and loop-level bounds from the $S$ and $T$ parameters, in the case of two multiplets of VL
quarks. This allows to study the effect of the interplay of the two multiplets and the effect of the extra Yukawa couplings among the two
VL multiplets ($\omega$ and $\omega'$ parameters). Even if in the previous sections we have calculated analytically the general mixing
structure under some approximations, for the numerical part of this analysis the mixing angles have been computed exactly by numerically
diagonalising the mass matrices.
\section{Results}
\label{sec:results}
For our numerical analysis we have considered the mass parameters $M_1$ and
$M_2$ of the VL quarks to be same, {\sl i.e.} $M_1 = M_2 = M$.
As the models have too many parameters to make a meaningful scan, we will show results in two limiting cases, when possible:
\begin{itemize}
\item the VL quarks can mix with a single SM generation, but not with each other (i.e. $\omega \sim \omega' \ll M$);
\item the VL quarks mix with each other (wherever possible), but the mixing with SM quarks is very small.
\end{itemize}
The results in these simple limits can give a general idea on the allowed value of the mixing parameters, even though the case where all of them
are non-zero is more realistic. We will focus on the benchmark value for the VL mass of $800$ GeV as a recent CMS analysis
\cite{CMS-PAS-B2G-12-017} sets a bound of $788$ GeV under the assumption of strong pair production of VL quarks and 100\% branching
fractions to $qW$. In the following we also consider cases in which the VL quark does not decay to $qW$.
For these cases the bound does not apply directly, but these VL quarks are in doublets containing also other VL quarks for which the bound applies.
As it is reasonable to assume that mass splittings inside multiplets are not large compared to the mass scale of the multiplet, we shall apply this
$800$ GeV benchmark value to all cases.
\subsection{Singlet $Y=2/3$ and Doublet $Y=7/6$}
\label{sec:results:1}
\begin{figure}[bth]
\begin{center}
\hspace*{-0.7cm}
\epsfig{file=Plots/bound_singnonSMdoub_first_M800,width=0.48\textwidth}
\hspace*{0.4cm}
\epsfig{file=Plots/bound_singnonSMdoub_third_M800,width=0.48\textwidth}
\end{center}
\caption{\underline{\bf \boldmath Singlet $Y=2/3$ and Doublet $Y=7/6$} (Section
\ref{sec:yukawa:1}): EWP bounds at 1 $\sigma$ (red-dashed), 2 $\sigma$ (green-dashed) and 3 $\sigma$ (blue) for VL quarks coupling with
the first (left panel) and third (right panel) SM generations, compared with the region excluded at 3$\sigma$ by tree-level bounds (yellow
region). Here, $M = 800$ GeV, and $\omega = \omega'=0$. Only the first quadrant is shown as the figures are symmetric with respect to
a sign change in the coordinates in the other 3 quadrants. Similar considerations apply to all the other figures of the same type.}
\label{fig:snonsmd3}
\end{figure}
This scenario contains -- besides the SM particle spectrum --
two VL top quarks and one exotic quark with charge $5/3$.
The Yukawa couplings and mass matrices for this scenario are given in
Section \ref{sec:yukawa:1}. The additional parameters (apart from the SM ones) are:
$x_2^k$, $y_1^k$, $\omega$, $\omega'$ and $M$ with $k$ running on SM quark generations.
We first study the case where $\omega' \sim \omega \sim 0$, and the VL quarks couple to a single generation: in this case, setting $\omega'$ to zero allows us to set both Yukawa couplings $x_2$ and $y_1$ to be real and positive.
The allowed regions in the parameter space, given the constraints from tree-level and EWP tests
discussed in Section \ref{sec:bounds}, are presented in Figure \ref{fig:snonsmd3}.
We see that for couplings to the light generations (see Appendix \ref{appendix:D} for the plot with second generation), the tree level bounds always dominate, and require the mixing of VL quarks to be rather small. The case of the third generation is very different: the tree level bounds are very weak as they only come from $V_{tb}$, while EWP tests allow for large mixings, especially via a compensation between the doublet and singlet (in particular, $y_1^3$ can assume very large values). This situation can be very interesting in the single-production channel, where for instance the top partner may be produced via couplings to the first generation (the smaller coupling is easily compensated by the valence quark in the initial state~\cite{Buchkremer:2013bha}) and then decay into a third generation quark~\cite{Brooijmans:2014eja,Beauceron:2014ila,Basso:2014apa}.
\begin{figure}[tb]
\begin{center}
\hspace*{-0.7cm}
\epsfig{file=Plots/bound_singnonSMdoub_omega_M800,width=0.48\textwidth}
\end{center}
\caption{\underline{\bf \boldmath Singlet $Y=2/3$ and Doublet $Y=7/6$} (Section
\ref{sec:yukawa:1}):
EWP bounds at 1$\sigma$ (red-dashed), 2$\sigma$ (green-dashed) and 3
$\sigma$
(blue) as a function of the new Yukawa couplings
$\omega$ and $\omega'$ with $M = 800$
GeV. We have assumed that there is
no mixing of VL quarks with the SM quark generations {\sl i.e.} $x_2^k =
y_1^k = 0$.}
\label{fig:dd1}
\end{figure}
In Figure \ref{fig:dd1} we show the EWP bounds in the plane
of the Yukawa couplings between VL quarks, $\omega$ and $\omega'$, assuming that the other couplings are small. This plot gives a general idea on the allowed size of $\omega$ and $\omega'$: the bound is indeed not very strong, and values up to $300$ GeV are allowed. The plot is clearly symmetric under change of sign of either $\omega$ or $\omega'$, reflecting the one arbitrary phase in this sector.
As we are approximately decoupling the two $t'$s from the SM quarks, the mixing is dominated by the $2\times 2$ block of the VL quarks, similar to the matrix in Eq.~(\ref{eq:massX2/3}).
We then see that the mixing angles (Eq.(\ref{eq:anglesX2/3})) vanish when $\omega = - \omega'$, thus explaining the sharp dents in the excluded region. This effect only appears in our limiting choice $M_1 = M_2$ and for negligible mixing to SM quarks.
\subsection{Doublet $Y=7/6$ and Triplet $Y=5/3$}
\label{sec:results:2}
\begin{figure}[tb]
\begin{center}
\hspace*{-0.7cm}
\epsfig{file=Plots/bound_tripnonSMdoub_first_M800,width=0.48\textwidth}
\hspace*{0.4cm}
\epsfig{file=Plots/bound_tripnonSMdoub_third_M800,width=0.48\textwidth}
\end{center}
\caption{\underline{\bf \boldmath Doublet $Y=7/6$ and Triplet $Y=5/3$} (Section
\ref{sec:yukawa:2}):
EWP bounds at 1$\sigma$ (red-dashed), 2$\sigma$ (green-dashed) and 3 $\sigma$ (blue) for VL quarks coupling with
the first (left panel) and third (right panel) SM generations, compared with the region excluded at 3$\sigma$ by tree-level bounds (yellow
region in the left panel). $M = 800$ GeV and $\omega = \omega'$.}
\label{fig:tnonsmd3}
\end{figure}
This scenario contains two VL top quarks and three exotic quarks: two with charge $5/3$ and one with charge $8/3$. All of these states
contribute to the corrections to the EWP tests. The Yukawa couplings and mass matrices for this scenario are given in Section
\ref{sec:yukawa:2}. The additional Yukawa couplings in the model are: $y_1^k$, $\omega$, $\omega'$ and $M$ with $k$ running on
SM quark generations.
As there is a single Yukawa mixing involving the SM quarks, we decided to add a non-vanishing $\omega$ in the scan, setting $\omega' = \omega$.
The combined bounds from tree-level and EWP tests are given in Figure \ref{fig:tnonsmd3} for scenarios where the VL quarks mix with either one of
the SM quark generation (case for second generation in Appendix \ref{appendix:D}). While three level bounds only exclude a large mixing to the SM
quarks in the case of light generations, a bound on the VL Yukawa $\omega$ arises from the EWP bounds.
For the light generations, both Yukawas are constrained to be small.
For third generation, the EWP bounds give similar value near the axes, however there is a cancellation absent in the case of light generation which opens the parameter space for $\omega = \omega' \sim y_1^3$, so that larger mixing angles are allowed.
In Figure \ref{fig:tnonsmd1} we show the EWP bounds in the plane of the new Yukawa couplings $\omega$ and $\omega'$. The bounds are not very strong, allowing values up to $200$ GeV. We also observe, like in Figure \ref{fig:dd1}, two dents for $\omega = - \omega'$ due to the vanishing of the mixing angles (for $M_1 = M_2$).
This is again an artifact of our choice of equal VL masses and vanishing couplings to the SM quarks.
\begin{figure}[tb]
\begin{center}
\hspace*{-0.7cm}
\epsfig{file=Plots/bound_tripnonSMdoub_omega_M800,width=0.48\textwidth}
\end{center}
\caption{\underline{\bf \boldmath Doublet $Y=7/6$ and Triplet $Y=5/3$} (Section
\ref{sec:yukawa:2}):
EWP bounds at 1$\sigma$ (red-dashed), 2$\sigma$ (green-dashed) and 3 $\sigma$
(blue) as a function of the new Yukawa couplings $\omega$ and $\omega'$ with $M = 500/800$ GeV (left/right panel
respectively). In addition the mixing of VL quarks with SM quarks is taken to be zero {\sl i.e.} $y_1^k = 0$. }
\label{fig:tnonsmd1}
\end{figure}
\subsection{Singlet $Y=2/3$ and Doublet $Y=1/6$}
\label{sec:results:3}
This scenario contains a VL copy of the SM quarks: two VL top quarks and one VL bottom quark. The additional Yukawa couplings in the model,
described in Section \ref{sec:yukawa:3}, are: $y_{1}^k$, $x_2^k$, and $M$ with $k$ running on SM quark generations. Here we set the Yukawa in the down sector $y_{1d}^k=0$ to minimise bounds from flavour physics: this can be done independently on the up sector.
\begin{figure}[tb]
\begin{center}
\hspace*{-0.7cm}
\epsfig{file=Plots/bound_singSMdoub_first_M800,width=0.48\textwidth}
\hspace*{.4cm}
\epsfig{file=Plots/bound_singSMdoub_third_M800,width=0.48\textwidth}
\end{center}
\caption{\underline{\bf \boldmath Singlet $Y=2/3$ and Doublet $Y=1/6$} (Section
\ref{sec:yukawa:3}):
EWP bounds at 1$\sigma$ (red-dashed), 2$\sigma$ (green-dashed) and 3 $\sigma$ (blue) for VL quarks coupling with
the first (left panel) and third (right panel) SM generations, compared with the region excluded at 3$\sigma$ by tree-level bounds (yellow
region in the left panel). Here, $M = 800$ GeV, and $\omega = \omega'=0$.}
\label{fig:ssmd3}
\end{figure}
In Figure \ref{fig:ssmd3} we show the combined bounds from EWP tests for VL quarks mixing with individual SM
quark generations. As in the previous scenarios, the mixing between VL quarks is taken to be zero, {\sl i.e.} $\omega = \omega' = 0$.
This scenario exhibits quite distinctive features depending on the VL mixings and masses.
In the case of mixing with the third generation, EWP bounds constrain quite tightly the allowed mixing parameters.
In the case of mixing with first generation only, tree level bounds are quite tight too up to a cancellation for $y_1^1 \sim x_2^1$ where the mixing can be arbitrarily large. This throat may suggest the possibility of large compositeness in the light quark sector.
However, we see that EWP bounds exclude this region and point back to small mixing. For the case of mixing with second generation (see Appendix \ref{appendix:D}), EWP bounds dominate and again force the scenario to small mixing parameters.
The bounds on $\omega$ and $\omega'$ are very similar to the previous cases, and we do not show them here.
\subsection{Doublet $Y=1/6$ and Doublet $Y=7/6$ }
\label{sec:results:4}
\begin{figure}[th]
\begin{center}
\hspace*{-0.7cm}
\epsfig{file=Plots/bound_bidoub_first_M800,width=0.48\textwidth}
\vspace*{0.4cm}
\epsfig{file=Plots/bound_bidoub_third_M800,width=0.48\textwidth}
\end{center}
\caption{\underline{\bf\boldmath Doublet $Y=1/6$ and Doublet $Y=7/6$} (Section
\ref{sec:yukawa:4}): EWP bounds at 1$\sigma$ (red-dashed), 2$\sigma$ (green-dashed) and 3 $\sigma$ (blue) for VL quarks coupling with
the first (left panel) and third (right panel) SM generations, compared with the region excluded at 3$\sigma$ by tree-level bounds (yellow
region in the left panel). $M = 800$ GeV, $\omega = \omega'=0$.}
\label{fig:dd3}
\end{figure}
This scenario is particularly interesting as it corresponds to a bi-doublet of the custodial SO(4) symmetry, which is often a basic ingredient for top partial compositeness in models of composite Higgs (see for instance~\cite{DeSimone:2012fs}).
This scenario contains two VL top quarks, one VL bottom quark and one exotic quark with charge
$5/3$. The additional parameters, described in Section
\ref{sec:yukawa:4}, are: $y_{1}^k$, $y_2^k$ and $M$ with $k$ running on SM quark generations.
Note that for this scenario mixing between VL quarks ({\sl i.e.} $\omega$ and $\omega'$) is not allowed.
Analogously to the model discussed in the previous Section \ref{sec:results:3},
this model also introduces an additional mixing in the bottom sector, which is again independent
from the the mixing in the top sector. Hence it is possible to impose the condition $y_{1d}^k = 0$ without affecting the top sector.
The results for the combined tree-level and EWP bounds are given in Figure \ref{fig:dd3}. For the first generation (and the second, see Appendix \ref{appendix:D}), there is an
interesting cancellation in the tree-level bounds for $|y_{1}^k| = |y_2^k|$: this is a
consequence of an enhanced custodial symmetry, and this fact has been used in the
literature to justify $\mathcal{O}(1)$ mixings of VL quarks with light generations~\cite{Barcelo:2011wu}.
EWP bounds show a similar cancellation, however along an axes which is a bit off compared to $|y_{1}^k| = |y_2^k|$, therefore a tension between the two allowed regions develops for large mixings.
Similar behaviour in the EWP bounds can be seen in the case of mixing to the third generation only.
\subsection{Single production cross sections}
\label{sec:results:5}
In this section a comparison between the tree-level and loop-level bounds and
the bounds from single production processes at the LHC is provided for the scenarios above.
The relevance of single production is given by the fact that its cross-section depends on both the masses
of the VL quarks and their couplings to the SM quarks; moreover, it is well known that
single production becomes the dominant channel at the LHC,
overcoming QCD pair production, when quark masses are higher than a certain (model-dependent) value.
For typical scenarios where VL quarks mix predominantly with third generation and mixing parameters are not too
constrained by flavour physics and EWP tests, the mass bounds from QCD pair production are already in the
region where the single production channel is relevant or even dominant \cite{Cacciapaglia:2011fx}.
So far, few experimental searches for single production of VL quarks
have been performed. The ATLAS experiment has performed two searches including single production of VL quarks:
in \cite{ATLAS:2012apa} a search for singly-produced VL quarks coupling only with first generation
is performed, while \cite{ATLAS-CONF-2014-036} is a search for for pair+single production of
VL quarks mixing with third generation only. The search \cite{ATLAS:2012apa} has already been
considered in a previous analysis \cite{Buchkremer:2013bha}
for comparing bounds from LHC and flavour physics, and we will consider
in this analysis part of the results obtained in that study.
To be specific, in the following we will consider the single production of a VL top partner in association with a light jet,
and the mass of the VL quark will be fixed to 800 GeV. We consider exclusive coupling to each of the three SM generations for each scenario.
\begin{figure}[tb]
\begin{center}
\hspace*{-0.7cm}
\epsfig{file=Plots/xsec_singnonSMdoub_first_M800,width=0.3\textwidth}
\hspace*{0.4cm}
\epsfig{file=Plots/xsec_singnonSMdoub_second_M800,width=0.3\textwidth}
\hspace*{0.4cm}
\epsfig{file=Plots/xsec_singnonSMdoub_third_M800,width=0.3\textwidth}
\end{center}
\caption{{\bf \boldmath Singlet $Y=2/3$ and Doublet $Y=7/6$}
for mixing with first generation only (left), second generation only (middle), third generation (right), and for a mass of the VL quarks of 800
GeV. The channel is T+jet. The grey contour lines correspond to
cross-section values in picobarns at 14 TeV. The region inside the
red line is allowed by the S and T parameters. The region inside the
blue line is allowed by the tree-level bounds. The dashed black lines
are the bounds from the ATLAS search \cite{ATLAS:2012apa}.}
\label{fig:xsnonsmd}
\end{figure}
The LHC bounds have been obtained by applying the model-independent
parametrisation described in \cite{Buchkremer:2013bha}. Considering
the observed cross-section reported in the ATLAS analysis
\cite{ATLAS:2012apa} and the universal coefficients computed in
\cite{Buchkremer:2013bha} (Tables 12-17) it is possible to set bounds on
the overall coupling strengths of the singly-produced VL quarks by using
the relations in Sections 3 and 4 of \cite{Buchkremer:2013bha}.
In the plots presented in
Figs \ref{fig:xsnonsmd}, \ref{fig:xtripnonsmd}, \ref{fig:xssmd},
\ref{fig:xdnonsmd} the LHC bounds are directly compared with the tree-level and EWPT bounds.
The region inside the red line is the one allowed by the S
and T parameters (oblique corrections) whereas the blue
line marks the constraint from tree-level bounds. The EWPT bound should be taken only as an
indication are the explicit assumption that no other extra
states contribute to the corrections is imposed; this simplification is not true in general,
e.g. in a complete model containing other new particles besides VL multiplets.
The dashed black lines are the bounds at $3 \sigma$ derived by reinterpreting the results of the ATLAS search \cite{ATLAS:2012apa}.
The grey lines represent the contours of the LHC production cross-section (in pb)
for the process of single production of a VL top quark in association with a light jet ($p p \to T j $).
The results of the ``Singlet ($Y=2/3$) and Doublet ($Y=7/6$)" scenario are summarised in
Figure \ref{fig:xsnonsmd}. For this scenario, the tree-level bounds are the most
stringent ones if VL quarks mix to the light generations, and they are stronger than the current bound form the ATLAS search. In both cases, the largest $T jet$ cross section allowed is between $0.5$ and $1$ pb.
In the case of mixing to the third generation only EWP and tree level bounds conspire to select small mixing, and the single production at 14 TeV is limited to small values around $100$ fb.
Figure \ref{fig:xtripnonsmd} shows the results for the ``Doublet ($Y=7/6$)
and Triplet ($Y=5/3$)" scenario.
In this case the oblique parameters
constrain a much larger region of parameter space and this is due to the much
richer exotic quark (quarks with charges $5/3$ and $8/3$) spectrum, that contributes
to the corrections to the oblique parameters.
The cross sections for the $t jet$ channel are much smaller than in the previous case, with value around $100$ fb for mixing to light generations: this is due to the suppression in the coupling of the $t'$ (belonging to a doublet) to the $W$ boson and a SM down-type quark. For the same reason, in the case of coupling to third generation only, the channel is nearly absent.
Figure \ref{fig:xssmd} refers to the ``Singlet ($Y=2/3$) and Doublet ($Y=1/6$)'' scenario.
Due to the presence of a SM type VL doublet, this scenario contains right
handed charged gauge boson couplings which give additional contributions to the
oblique parameters. However, the tree-level constraints are the most stringent for the parameter space of this scenario.
We see that in the case of mixing to the first generation, large production rates are allowed, with cross sections above 1 pb and a region already probed by the ATLAS search. Smaller cross sections are attained in the case of mixing to the second generation, while the maximum values drop to about $100$ fb for mixing to the third generation.
This is the scenario than offers the largest single-production cross sections, and it is a golden case to be studied at the Run 2 of the LHC.
Finally, in Figure \ref{fig:xdnonsmd} the results for the ``Doublet
($Y=1/6$) and Doublet ($Y=7/6$)" scenario are presented. Again, though the presence of an exotic quark with charge 5/3 and of
right-handed charged currents which contribute to the corrections to the oblique parameters, the tree-level constraints are
stronger for the most part of the parameter space.
The large mixings allowed in the cancellation region produce very large $T jet$ cross sections, with the largest mixing already excluded by the ATLAS search. This is indeed a case where single production can be the most promising channel for the observation of the VL quarks.
In the case of mixing the third generation, the single production vanishes: the reason for this is that $t'$s belonging to doublets have very suppressed couplings to the $W b$, thus they cannot be produced in association with a light jet but only in association with tops.
\begin{figure}[tb]
\begin{center}
\hspace*{-0.7cm}
\epsfig{file=Plots/xsec_tripnonSMdoub_first_M800,width=0.3\textwidth}
\hspace*{0.4cm}
\epsfig{file=Plots/xsec_tripnonSMdoub_second_M800,width=0.3\textwidth}
\hspace*{0.4cm}
\epsfig{file=Plots/xsec_tripnonSMdoub_third_M800,width=0.3\textwidth}
\end{center}
\caption{{\bf \boldmath Doublet $Y = 7/6$ and Triplet $Y = 5/3$}
for mixing with first generation only (left) ,second generation only (middle), third generation (right),
and for a mass of the VL quarks of 800 GeV. The channel is T+jet. The grey contour lines correspond
to cross-section values in picobarns at 14 TeV. The region inside
the red line is allowed by the S and T parameters. The region inside
the blue line is allowed by the tree-level bounds. The dashed black lines
are the bounds from the ATLAS search \cite{ATLAS:2012apa}.}
\label{fig:xtripnonsmd}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure}[tb]
\begin{center}
\hspace*{-0.7cm}
\epsfig{file=Plots/xsec_singSMdoub_first_M800,width=0.30\textwidth}
\hspace*{0.4cm}
\epsfig{file=Plots/xsec_singSMdoub_second_M800,width=0.30\textwidth}
\hspace*{0.4cm}
\epsfig{file=Plots/xsec_singSMdoub_third_M800,width=0.30\textwidth}
\end{center}
\caption{{\bf \boldmath Singlet $Y=2/3$ and Doublet $Y=1/6$}
for mixing with first generation only
(left), second generation only (middle), third generation (right), and for a mass of the VL quarks
of 800 GeV. The channel is T+jet. The grey contour lines correspond
to cross-section values in picobarns at 14 TeV. The region inside
the red line is allowed by the S and T parameters. The region inside
the blue line is allowed by the tree-level bounds. The dashed black lines
are the bounds from the ATLAS search \cite{ATLAS:2012apa}.}
\label{fig:xssmd}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure}[htb]
\begin{center}
\hspace*{-0.7cm}
\epsfig{file=Plots/xsec_bidoub_first_M800,width=0.3\textwidth}
\hspace*{0.4cm}
\epsfig{file=Plots/xsec_bidoub_second_M800,width=0.3\textwidth}
\hspace*{0.4cm}
\epsfig{file=Plots/xsec_bidoub_third_M800,width=0.3\textwidth}
\end{center}
\caption{{\bf \boldmath Doublet $Y = 1/6$ and Doublet $Y = 7/6$}
for mixing with first generation only
(left), second generation only (middle), third generation (right), and for a mass of the VL quarks
of 800 GeV. The channel is T+jet. The grey contour lines correspond
to cross-section values in picobarns at 14 TeV (this channel is not allowed in the case of the plot on the right). The region inside
the red line is allowed by the S and T parameters. The region inside
the blue line is allowed by the tree-level bounds. The dashed black lines
are the bounds from the ATLAS search \cite{ATLAS:2012apa}.}
\label{fig:xdnonsmd}
\end{figure}
An interesting common feature of all the scenario considered is that the
LHC bounds can be competitive if not stronger than the tree- and loop-level
bounds. Indeed the current LHC data we have considered
are already able to constrain region of parameter space
otherwise allowed by other observables.
Another type of constraints can be obtained exploiting tools for the recasting of experimental searches
for pair production of VL quarks.
Considering the bounds on masses and couplings of the VL multiplets it is possible
to compute their branching ratios into SM states, and through the
recently developed software XQCAT
\cite{Barducci:2014ila,Barducci:2014gna,XQCATweb}, one can determine
the exclusion regions by considering results from dedicated searches
in pair production and other searches not specifically designed for
VL quarks (such as SUSY analyses). This study can be performed systematically
for different combinations of VL multiplets, and we postpone this
analysis to a subsequent paper, where we will compare the bounds
obtained by XQCAT with dedicated simulations for specific scenarios.
\section{Conclusions}
\label{sec:concl}
Vector-like quarks are predicted by many theoretically motivated models
of new physics. In most of these models VL quarks appear in complete multiplets
and, usually, more than one multiplet is predicted.
In this analysis we have considered scenarios with multiple VL quarks both from
the point of view of the general mixing structure with the three
Standard Model generations and considering the mixing pattern of these multiplets
for the determination of mixing effects and precision electroweak observables
both at tree-level and at loop-level. The specific case of two
different vector-like quark multiplets has been studied in detail,
with a special focus on multiplets containing a top partner. The main
result of our analysis is that tree-level and loop-level constraints
provide complementary information.
Moreover the interplay of the vector-like multiplets
among themselves and with the Standard model quarks have important
consequences for phenomenology as in some cases large single production
cross-sections are possible and coupling with light generations is not
necessarily suppressed. These results have phenomenological
implications for LHC searches as the bounds we have extracted pinpoint
particular regions of the parameter space and suggest that in
realistic cases containing multiple multiplets of vector-like quarks,
cancellations are possible from tree-level bounds which allow large
values of the mixing parameters. Even if the EWP tests partially
allow to limit these regions where cancellations occur, one has to
keep in mind that these loop-level constraints are valid under the
assumption that no other states apart from the vector-like multiplets
contribute to the S and T parameters. Therefore it is clear that
direct searches by the LHC experimental collaborations in the next run
of the LHC will play a mayor role in constraining or discovering
physics beyond the Standard Model which contains vector-like
multiplets.
\section*{Acknowledgments}
AD is partially supported by Institut Universitaire de France. AD and
GC also acknowledge partial support from the Labex-LIO (Lyon Institute
of Origins) under grant ANR-10-LABX-66, FRAMA (FR3127, F\'ed\'eration
de Recherche ``Andr\'e Marie Amp\`ere ``) and IN2P3 Theory-LHC France
funding. The research of YO is supported in part by the Grant-in Aid
for Scientific Research,Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
(JSPS), No. 20244037 and No.22244031. The research of NG is partially
supported by Department of Science \& Technology (DST) project
no. SR/S2/HEP-09/2010. NG and DH are thankful to RECAPP, HRI and
organizers of WHEPP-13 where part of the work was done. The work of DH
was supported by Centenary post-doctoral fellowship of IISc,
Bengaluru.
|
\section{Introduction}
Corruption has been understood as an important aspect forming societies as well as economic connections for a long time. Recently, it has also become more evident that grasping corruption quantitatively can yield important additions to models in social sciences and especially economics. Various studies examine corruption in fields of microeconomics, macroeconomics, institutional economics or international trade and its influence on economic performance, efficiency and decision making. Corruption is thus in the centre of interest of many empirical and theoretical works \cite{Wei2000,Svensson2005,Shleifer1993}.
The most prominent topic regarding corruption is its impact on economic growth showing a negative influence of corruption on the growth \cite{Mauro1995,Mauro1997}. Another attractive domain of corruption effects is in the inequality studies, which show that corruption increases inequality \cite{Gupta2002}. The increased corruption also tends to boost public investments but these yield lower returns \cite{Haque2008}. The higher corruption not only lowers the public investment returns but also the level of private investments with a higher public-to-private investment ratio as a result \cite{Mauro1995,Davoodi1997,Tarhan2008}.
In general, the empirical studies reveal negative effects of corruption on economic performance in terms of lower growth, private investments, higher inequality or wasting of talents. Except for the studies concerning the macroeconomic performance, corruption studies are becoming more popular in the international trade area as well. The theoretical effect of corruption on mutual trade is not straightforward as it can have both negative and positive effects. In the case of an adverse impact, corruption can be viewed as an additional tax because of bribes, a complicated enforcement of mutual agreements or an institutional safety \cite{Horsewood2012}. The other perspective is completely opposite. Corruption helps to facilitate mutual business and to guarantee basic rights when the institutions are of a low quality.
When we abandon theoretical considerations and explore empirical literature, we cannot unanimously conclude that corruption has only a negative role in FDI (foreign direct investments) or trade, although it seems to be mostly the case \cite{Egger2006,Busse2007,Habib2001}. Studies disrupting the prevailing negative effects of corruption are present as well. Egger \& Winner \cite{Egger2005} show that corruption can stimulate FDI in the short as well as the long term. They argue that a corrupt country attracts investments from other corrupt countries. In other words, a country attracts investments from countries with a similar institutional quality \cite{Cuervo-Cazura2006}. Brada \textit{et al.} \cite{Brada2012} go further and they develop a theoretical model showing that the most beneficial position in the FDI engagement is to be a ``medium corrupt'' country. Such a country has advanced technologies, good institutions but also knowledge of the corruption culture. Hence they can be engaged in an FDI mediation with corrupt as well as non-corrupt countries. If a country is highly corrupt, it has a problem attracting investments from low corrupt countries and vice versa.
Such an ambiguous role of corruption is found in the international trade analyses also. Horsewood \& Voicu \cite{Horsewood2012} report adverse effects of corruption on mutual trade. On the other hand, de Jong \& Bogmans \cite{DeJong2011} find that corruption can stimulate imports under special circumstances. Some further results can be found in Refs. \cite{Dutt2010,Goel2011,Thede2012}.
Analysis of corruption has been of interest in the interdisciplinary research as well. Shao \textit{et al.} \cite{Shao2007} demonstrate a power-law functional dependence between corruption level and economic factors, such as country wealth and foreign direct investments per capita. Podobnik \textit{et al.} \cite{Podobnik2008} report that an increase of the corruption perception index leads to an increase of the annual GDP per capita growth rate between 1999 and 2004. In addition, the authors introduce a new measure to quantify the relative corruption between countries based on their respective wealth as measure by GDP per capita. Podobnik \textit{et al.} \cite{Podobnik2013} further propose a production function (divided into the private and public sectors) where GDP depends on market capitalization, the public or private section workforce and competitiveness level to quantify the public sector efficiency. It is demonstrated that the less corrupt countries receive more investments that the more corrupt ones. Finally Podobnik \textit{et al.} \cite{Podobnik2012} argue that it is improbable that a country would rapidly improve its corruption rank.
Even though the effects of corruption on various economic indicators and measures have been often investigated, an important message remains hidden beneath the results. The reported findings suggest that there are at least several groups of countries which are differentiated according to their corruption level and these groups tend to trade with each other more and they invest into similar countries as well. However, there is no study examining the actual clustering of countries according to their corruption or their corruption perception. Here, we aim to fill this gap in the literature by bridging an economic topic with tools of complex systems and interdisciplinary physics -- clustering analysis. In the following section, we describe the utilized methodology in some detail. The next section describes the analyzed dataset followed by results presentation and interpretation. The last section concludes. We find that countries indeed cluster according to their corruption levels and we identify four well-divided clusters. Moreover, these clusters nicely correspond to a stage of development of the member countries. The level of corruption is thus found to be tightly connected to country's development.
\section{Methodology}
The clustering analysis has now quite a long history in economic and financial applications mainly due a pioneering work of Mantegna \cite{Mantegna1999} utilizing minimum spanning trees and hierarchical trees to uncover a hierarchical structure in the US stocks. The methodology has then been applied to various markets such as stocks and stock indices \cite{Onnela2002,Onnela2003,Onnela2004,Bonanno2004,Tumminello2007,Brida2008,Eom2009,DiMatteo2010,Eom2010,Nobi2014}, foreign exchange rates \cite{Mizuno2006,Naylor2007,Jang2011,Keskin2011}, import/export networks \cite{Kantar2011}, interest rates \cite{Tabak2009}, and commodities \cite{Tabak2010,Kristoufek2012,Kristoufek2013}. Most of the studies focus on correlation analysis, using the correlation matrix as a starting point. The dissimilarity (distance) matrix is constructed using the correlations which then allows for the spanning and hierarchical trees construction. However, our analysis cannot use such an approach and we must apply an alternative one due to a specific nature of the corruption data and a different aim of the analysis.
We analyze a corruption clustering of various countries. For each country, we get a time series of the Freedom from Corruption (COR) index of the Heritage Foundation which ranges between 0 and 100 with higher values meaning lower corruption (more details are given in the next section). We are primarily interested in a common level of the index as well as in a co-movement between indices of different countries. Therefore, we cannot use a standard correlation procedure which demeans the series and thus the information about the corruption level is lost. Instead of a correlation coefficient, we utilize the simple Euclidean distance $d_{xy}$ between time series (or in general vectors) $\{x_t\}$ and $\{y_t\}$ defined as
\begin{equation}
d_{xy}=\sqrt{\sum_{t=1}^{T}{(x_t-y_t)^2}}
\end{equation}
where $T$ is the time series length. Even though there are various possibilities for defining distances \cite{Mardia1979,Borg1997}, we opt for the most basic Euclidean one\footnote{We have applied other distance metrics as well and the results remain qualitatively practically intact.}. We thus have a distance between time series as a measure of dissimilarity between corruption levels in pairs of countries forming a distance matrix $D$, which is symmetric with zeros on the diagonal.
For the hierarchical structure construction, we utilize the average linkage clustering approach (also known as UPGMA). The algorithm starts with nodes in a network treated as a separate cluster each. The closest pair is identified based on the lowest distance in the distance matrix $D$ (except for the diagonal elements). This closest pair forms a new cluster and it is substituted into the distance matrix instead of the original two elements. The new cluster is assigned the average of the distances of all elements of the newly formed cluster. This is repeated until we have a single cluster \cite{Sorensen1948,Everitt2001,Defays1977}. Such construction can be seen as a cautious one as it uses the average distance for the new cluster instead of minima or maxima of the alternative approaches\footnote{In the Results section, we also provide two alternative clustering linkage methods -- complete \cite{Sorensen1948} and Ward's \cite{Murtagh2014} algorithms.}.
The resulting hierarchical structure is standardly reported in the form of a dendrogram -- a tree diagram (from Greek \textit{dendron} for a tree and \textit{gramma} for drawing). The diagram shows the most important connections as an output of the clustering analysis and a possible hierarchical structure in the analyzed dataset. The most standard way of drawing a dendrogram is in a form of roots of a tree which is mostly of a rectangular shape. For large datasets and mainly a large number of time series, alternative methods can be utilized for a better graphical representation\footnote{The analysis has been performed in RStudio 0.98.1028 via R 3.1.1 using the \textit{ape} and \textit{stats} packages.}.
\section{Data}
We examine the corruption clustering using the Freedom from Corruption (COR) index of the Heritage Foundation between years 1996 and 2014. Only the countries with statistics for each year within the analyzed period are included in the final dataset. This accounts for 134 countries. The Freedom from Corruption is based primarily on the Corruption Perception Index (CPI) constructed by the Transparency International. The CPI is a 0-10 range index with 0 meaning the most corrupt country and 10 the opposite. The COR is constructed by simply multiplying the CPI by 10. Hence the COR is on 0-100 scale. If the CPI index is unavailable for a country, the Heritage Foundation estimates the index using expert information from other reliable sources \footnote{U.S. Department of Commerce, Economist Intelligence Unit, Office of the U.S. Trade Representative and official government publications of each country. Additional information can be found at http://www.heritage.org/index/freedom-from-corruption.}. However, it needs to be noted that the number of countries not covered by the CPI is very low.
The CPI is not an index of an objective actual state of corruption but of the perception of corruption in the public sector of a country. The Transparency International uses several sources to derive the index\footnote{E.g. African Development Bank Governance Ratings, Economist Intelligence Unit Country Risk Ratings, IMD World Competitiveness Yearbook, Political Risk Services International Country Risk Guide or World Justice Project Rule of Law Index.}. The institutions ask country experts to assess the corruption level in the country in many aspects. The data is then gathered and the CPI is constructed to reflect the level of corruption in a country perceived by its experts.
Of course, the CPI has some natural weaknesses. The most important one is that the CPI is derived from the experts' judgement. The results can be obviously biased by the ``elite'' position of the respondent. The perception of corruption could be different if the ``ordinary ones'' were asked. Another problem lays in the comparison of the CPI scores between years. Temporal changes in ranking can be caused by changes in the country CPI sample or methodology. To overcome these shortcomings, several alternative corruption indices have been developed (e.g. the Global Corruption Barometer, the Bribe Payers Index or the WB's Worldwide Governance Indicators -- Control of Corruption index). Even though all the criticism points to the relevant CPI shortcomings, the index is still the key measure of corruption level across countries. The discussion about CPI validity shows difficulties concerning the corruption measurement which can never be objective and must somehow rely on perceptions. The CPI still offers the largest database of corruption indicator with sufficient historical time series and it remains the most suitable resource for cross-country corruption studies.
\section{Results}
We apply the average linkage clustering technique based on the Euclidean distances to find a possible hierarchical structure between corruption levels of 134 studied countries. In Fig. \ref{fig1}, we present the final depiction of clustering between analyzed states\footnote{In the Appendix, we also present Figs. \ref{fig2} and \ref{fig3} which are based on the complete and Ward's linkage algorithms, respectively. Even though the details of the hierarchical structure are not identical, the interpretation of the results is qualitatively very close to what we present for the average linkage clustering in the main text. The results are thus quite robust to the linkage algorithm selection.}. Due to a large number of the examined countries, we opt for a spherical representation of the dendrogram. In the centre of the figure, the distance between clusters is the highest and the further we get from the centre of the circle, the closer the clusters or countries are.
We observe that the network of countries breaks down into four well-defined clusters\footnote{The definition of clusters is quite arbitrary here and we label the main clusters based on a visual inspection. If desirable, the number of clusters could be reduced to two -- Clusters \#1 and \#2 together, and Clusters \#3 and \#4 together. The main message of the results would remain very similar. Either way, the reported results, their structure and implications presented in this section show that such cluster selection is reasonable.}. To help reader with orientation in Fig. \ref{fig1}, we separate the clusters by additional dashed lines. Furthermore, we list the countries according to their cluster membership in Table \ref{tab1} as well. A very interesting clustering structure emerges.
Cluster \#1 is mainly formed of developed countries, i.e. the USA, Japan, the Western states of the EU, Hong Kong, Singapore, Australia and New Zealand, and it forms a solid piece of network structure with the average COR of $82.92\pm1.82$. Members of this cluster thus have very low corruption levels. Compared to the values of other clusters, which are reported in Table \ref{tab1}, the first cluster is very well separated from the others and a considerable distance to other clusters is evident.
The cluster is clearly separated from the others not only in terms of the corruption level but also in terms of the economic development. The average GDP per capita\footnote{Gross domestic product (GDP) for year 2012 is reported. GDP is a widely used measure of overall economic performance of a given country.} in the group is 52,138 current USD\footnote{Data source: World Development Indicators, WB, year 2012.}. There is no country from the African continent. Both most developed countries from the North and Central America (the USA and Canada) are members of the cluster as well as is the only one and also the most developed country from the Latin America (Chile), the most developed states from Oceania (New Zealand and Australia), except for Kuwait the most developed nations on the Asian continent (Singapore, Japan, Hong Kong and UAE) and 13 most developed countries of Europe. The lowest GDP per capita is less than 7 times lower than the highest one. In other words, the cluster of the least corrupt countries is composed of the most developed nations across all continents. Hence we see that low corruption is clearly connected with economic development.
Cluster \#2 is more heterogeneous as it contains various EU states such as Malta, Cyprus, Spain, Portugal and Slovenia (i.e. somewhere between the most developed Western states and the post-communist East) as well as a mix of Taiwan, Israel, Barbados, Botswana and others for which the connection can be seen usually only for small groups (such as a mini-cluster of oil exporters Oman, Bahrain and Kuwait). The average COR of $59.21\pm 1.47$ still suggests a decent level of corruption.
This cluster has a lower average GDP per capita of about half the GDP of the most developed cluster (23,521 USD). It consists of the fourth most developed African state (Botswana), the third and fifth most developed countries of the Central and North America, and the second most developed country of the Latin America. Also five (including the first one) from the eleven most developed states in Asia are members of the cluster. The ratio between the lowest and the highest GDP per capita is less than 8. The cluster hence contains states which can be labeled as the upper-middle class of economic development. They exhibit significantly lower economic performance in terms of per capita GDP but still much higher than the other states. These countries are the ``runner-up'' leaders on their continents and they are trying to catch up the leading group. Hence we can regard the cluster as a ``successfully transitioning'' or a ``catching up'' group. The cluster is not only the second richest one but it also has the second lowest corruption level.
Cluster \#3 is then the biggest one with 60 members and the average COR of $24.15\pm 0.78$, i.e. the lowest value among clusters suggesting the highest level of corruption. The basket of countries is quite diverse here ranging from the new EU members (Bulgaria and Romania) to Russia and countries in between (Belarus, Moldova, the Ukraine) to China and India as well many African, Asian and a few Latin American countries. Several interesting implications arise from this structure. First, Bulgaria and Romania seem to be institutionally very different from the rest of the EU as no other EU country falls into the most corrupt cluster. Even the newest EU member state (Croatia) is a member of the last cluster which possesses lower levels of corruption. Second, all BRIC countries (Brazil, Russia, India and China), which historically form a group of large, fast-growing economies, belong to the cluster. These countries are thus still well-behind the developed countries with respect to corruption environment and behavior. And third, various authoritarian regimes fall into this cluster as well -- Azerbaijan, Iran, Laos, North Korea, Syria, Turkey, Venezuela and Vietnam. The corruption levels are thus tightly connected to the form of reign in a country. Note that most of the countries in the least corrupt cluster are standard, western-type democracies.
From the GDP per capita point of view, the third cluster is again quite diverse. The average GDP per capita is the lowest one with 3,888 USD. However, a range between the richest and the poorest country in the cluster is immense with a ratio of 53 -- between Malawi (287 USD) and Russia (14,090 USD).
Nonetheless, we can regard the cluster as a group of countries with the lowest economic performance. The cluster contains not only the poor countries or countries in civil war situations (e.g. Libya or Syria) but also transition states with a high future economic potential (e.g. Brazil or Turkey). It is likely the highest corruption can be a relevant obstacle for the development of these countries and hence the corruption-economic development correlation seems to be valid even in this case.
Cluster \#4 is somewhere between the previous two clusters with the average COR of $41.28\pm 0.98$. This is again quite a heterogeneous cluster (the ratio between the the richest and the poorest country is 45) with several interesting subgroups. First, the whole Visegrad group (the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland and Slovakia), post-communist countries in the Central Europe, as well as the Baltic post-communist states (Latvia and Lithuania) are members of this cluster\footnote{Estonia is not in the dataset due to incomplete time series.}. Second, the newest member state of the EU -- Croatia -- is also part of the cluster and it thus readily joins the post-communist countries of the region, overtaking Bulgaria and Romania. Third, some of developed countries such as Italy and Greece fall into this cluster as well which might give a notion about economic problems and its causes in these states. And fourth, practically the whole region of the North Africa (Algeria, Egypt, Morocco and Tunisia) is inside the cluster. From the economic perspective, the last cluster falls within the second and the third one with the average GDP of 9,751 USD. The connection between corruption and economic development is thus supported even by the last detected cluster.
\section{Conclusions}
We have inspected a possible clustering structure of the corruption perception among 134 countries. Using the average linkage clustering, we have uncovered a well-defined hierarchy in the relationships among countries. Four main clusters have been identified and they suggest that countries worldwide can be quite well separated according to their perception of corruption. Moreover, we have found a strong connection between corruption levels and a stage of development inside the clusters. The ranking of countries according to their corruption perfectly copies the ranking according to the economic performance measured by the gross domestic product per capita of the member states. Even though our analysis does not (as it cannot) discuss potential causality between the two, the reported results remain promising. We believe that our analysis, which is the first one to the best of our knowledge, can be used as a starting point of various analyses in social sciences which struggle to find an appropriate mechanism of separating countries according to such a specific criterion as corruption. We are convinced that the appropriate clustering can be beneficial especially for studies concerning international trade where the corruption is gaining increasing attention and the studies lack rigorous differentiation of corrupt countries.
\section*{Acknowledgements}
This research has been supported by the CERGE-EI Foundation under a program of the Global Development Network with a grant number RRC15+55. All opinions expressed are those of the authors and have not been endorsed by CERGE-EI or the GDN. The research has also received funding from the Czech Science Foundation under project No. P402/12/0982 and the SVV project 260 113 ``Strengthening Doctoral Research in Economics and Finance''. Michal Paulus acknowledges the support of the Deutscher Akademischer Austausch Dienst (DAAD) sponsoring the long-term research visit (grant No. 50015537) at the Humboldt Unviersität zu Berlin and of the Grant Agency of the Charles University in Prague.
\section*{References}
\bibliographystyle{unsrt}
|
\section{The local fluctuations of $n$ in solids \label{localrefraction}}
In this work we have chosen terrylene (Tr) \cite{ANIEBACK:ANIE199005251} as the object of analysis. It has been widely studied in different matrixes by the laser selective spectroscopy methods, and is one of the most used fluorophores in SMS. For this compound the $T_1$ values were measured for a set of solid matrices \cite{Harms1999533}: \textit{polyethylene} (PE), \textit{polystyrene} (PS), \textit{polyvinyl-butyral} (PVB), \textit{polymethyl-methacrylate} (PMMA), and solid \textit{n-hexadecane} (Hex). In the context of the present work we also had to find the refractive indices for these matrices. The $n$ values for PE, PS, PVB were found in \cite{Cooper:patent}, whereas PMMA and HEX refractive indexes were measured by our team using the laboratory Abbe refractometer (URL-1, Russia) (see the table in Fig.~\ref{fig_2}). In Fig.~\ref{fig_2} we have plotted the $T_1$ values for Tr molecules in all of the above mentioned matrixes against the values of $n$ in these systems. The obtained $T_1(n)$ dependence was fitted using different models (Eqs.~(\ref{virtual})-(\ref{real2})). The best fit was proved to correspond to the virtual--cavity model Eq.~(\ref{virtual}) (red curve in Fig.~\ref{fig_2}), with the value of $\tau_0=12.1$ ns (i.e., $\Gamma_0=13.1$ MHz).
Given the value $\tau_0$ and the best dependence $T_1(n)$ for the Tr molecule, we can calculate the local value of $n$ at the position of a SM from its lifetime-limited ZPL width measured in the matrix involved (Fig.~\ref{fig_1}). To do this, we have taken the unique experimental data on SM ZPL width distributions form Refs.~\cite{Donley1999255,Donley2000109} obtained in the ETH, Zurich (inset in Fig.~\ref{fig_3}). The authors had performed unprecedented and complicated measurements at milliKelvin temperatures on the SMS setup equipped with the $^3$He/$^4$He dilution cryostat. At these conditions, the broadening contributions $\Delta\Gamma_{e-tunn}$ and $\Delta\Gamma_{e-phon}$ were negligible. The measurements were performed at the laser excitation intensities well below the saturation intensity. Thus, in accordance with Eq.~(\ref{plas}) the obtained data were the distributions of lifetime-limited SM ZPL widths $\Gamma_0$ directly related to SM effective excited state lifetimes $T_1$. These distributions $P_{\Gamma_0}(\Gamma_0)$ can be easily converted into the distributions of $P_{T_1}(T_1)$ using Eq.~(\ref{G0}) and then into the distributions of refraction indices $P_n(n)$ (Fig.~\ref{fig_3}) using the virtual--cavity model (Eq.~(\ref{virtual})) with the $\tau_0= 12.1$ ns.
Considering these distributions of $n$ obtained for the polycrystalline and the polymer media one should note the following: (a) there are significant fluctuations of the refractive index local values in real materials; (b) the value of $n$ measured in a bulk sample by classical methods corresponds to the peak of the $P_n(n)$ obtained in the sample. Fig.~\ref{fig_3} shows that this is valid for polyethylene and naphthalene. This implies the applicability of the proposed approach for the probing of the local fluctuations of the refractive index; (c) the local fluctuations of $n$ in the amorphous polymer are substantially greater than in the molecular polycrystal.
If one looks again at Fig.~\ref{fig_2}, another satisfactory fit is seen (black dash-dot curve), which corresponds to microscopic model (Eq.~(\ref{virtual2})). Note that it includes the Lorentz local-field factor as in the best fit with Eq.~(\ref{virtual}). The other three models result in much worse approximations. Yet, we have recalculated the distribution of lifetime-limited $\Gamma_0$ in naphthalene into the distributions of refraction indices $P_n(n)$ using all the rest models. Fig.~\ref{fig_3} shows that the distributions using the fits for Eqs.~(\ref{virtual2}) and (\ref{real}) are subjected to significant broadening and, what is most important, their peaks are notably shifted from the value of $n$ in bulk naphthalene. The other two $P_n(n)$ distributions not shown are even worse. We treat this as another evidence of the correct choice of the model and the validity of the developed approach. Note that naphthalene was absent among the systems (Fig.~\ref{fig_2}), in which $T_1$ was directly measured.
To conclude, in our study we proposed a unique approach for the probing of the local refractive index fluctuations in solids. The method is based on the detection of SM ZPLs at conditions allowing lifetime-limited spectral line widths. The great potential of this approach is demonstrated. Particularly, simultaneous reconstruction of SM spatial coordinates with the nanometre accuracy by super-resolution fluorescence microscopy \cite{NaumovEPJD:2014} opens the way to perform sub-diffraction refractometry. It was found that there are significant fluctuations of the local $n$ values in amorphous polymer and molecular polycrystalline media. These fluctuations are substantially greater in more disordered medium. The peak of the distribution $P_n(n)$ corresponds to the value of $n$, averaged over the bulk sample, which is usually obtained by traditional methods.
\begin{acknowledgments}
This work was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Researches: 13-02-01303 and
14-29-07270
.
\end{acknowledgments}
|
\section{Introduction}
The regulation of star formation activity (SF) in galaxies of
different masses is still an open problem in cosmological
simulations.
Different feedback mechanisms have been proposed to regulate the
transformation of gas into stars. Among them, supernova (SN) feedback is considered to play a
critical role in the regulation of SF, with a larger impact for galaxies with circular
velocities lower than $\sim 100 \, {\rm km\, s}^{-1}$ \citep{dekelsilk1986}.
The SN feedback modelling in
hydrodynamical codes has certainly helped to reach better agreement of
the properties of the simulated galaxies with
observations \citep[e.g.][]{Governato2007,springel2006,Scannapieco2006}.
However, these studies also show that SN feedback might not be efficient enough to regulate
the SF activity in low-mass systems,
principally at high redshift. This problem manifests itself, for example, in
the apparent inconsistency between the stellar-to-virial mass relation obtained
from abundance matching techniques and that of hydrodynamical
simulations in the low-mass end
\citep[e.g.][]{Sawala2011,Moster2013,Behroozi2013}. Different
feedback mechanisms such as cosmic rays, radiative feedback or
photoionization, among others, have been explored with the aim of
improving the regulation of the SF in numerical models
\citep[e.g.][]{Wadepuhl2011,Stinson2012,Hopkins2013,Ceverino2014}. However, much
work is still needed to both understand the physical processes which regulate
star formation as a function of redshift and to improve their modelling in numerical simulations.
High-mass X-ray binaries (HMXBs) are accretion-powered stellar systems
composed by a black hole or a neutron star and a companion massive star, which
emit X rays at typical luminosities of $10^{38}\,{\rm erg \, s}^{-1}$
\citep[see][for a review]{Fabbiano2006} and hence provide a radiative feedback
on the interstellar medium. In some cases, they also produce collimated outflows
(jets) with similar kinetic luminosities. These jets act as another feedback
mechanism, heating the surrounding medium. The interest on
HMBXs has increased in the last years because theoretical and observational
works suggest that the production, and possibly the luminosity of these
sources, could increase with decreasing metallicity of the stellar progenitor
\citep[e.g.][]{Dray2006,Linden2010,Kaaret2011,Brorby2014}. Under this
hypothesis, HMBXs could play an important role in the formation and evolution
of galaxies at early epochs of the Universe.
Given their radiative feedback, HMXBs have been proposed as effective
sources of reionization of the intergalactic medium (IGM) and of heating of the
gas component in the small haloes in the very early Universe
\citep[e.g.][]{Power2009}. A recent report from \citet{Fragos2013B} use the
results of combining semi-analytical models of galaxy formation with a
population synthesis code \citep{Fragos2013A}, to compare the X-ray luminosity
density produced by HMXBs and active galactic nuclei as a function of redshift,
claiming that the first prevails at $z \gtrsim 6-8$. Different works have also
studied the role of these binaries in the heating of the IGM and the shaping of
the 21~cm signal from first galaxies
\citep{Power2013,Kaaret2014,Fialkov2014,Pacucci2014}. HMXBs have also been
investigated as a source of reionization. \citet{Mirabel2011} suggest that the
rate of ionizing photons emitted by HMXBs with black holes might be greater
than that of their progenitor stars, and that these sources could heat the IGM
up to $10^4$~K, keeping it ionized. Using zoomed hydrodynamical simulations of
mini-haloes, \citet{Jeon2013} have analysed the feedback from Population~III
(hereafter Pop~III) HMXBs. Their results suggest that X-ray photons from these
sources may suppress small scale structures and reduce the recombination rate
in the IGM, providing a net positive feedback on reionization.
\citet{Knevitt2014} investigated the effect of HMXBs on the high redshift IGM
using a one-dimensional radiative transfer code. Contrary to previous works,
they found that HMXBs do not produce neither any significant additional
ionization nor heating of the IGM, except for the distant IGM in the case of
continuous star formation. As it can be seen from the above discussion, the
issue of the effects of the radiative feedback from HMXBs is far from being
settled.
Recently, \citet{Justham2012} studied high-mass X-ray binaries (HMXBs) as a
potential source of feedback through the kinetic energy of their jets.
Those HMXBs comprising black holes (hereafter, BHXs) are among the most
powerful X-rays and jet emitters. The potential of BHXs as an efficient
feedback mechanism at high redshift is supported by observational results from
\citet{Fender2005} which suggest that the
contribution of kinetic energy from BHX jets could be significant compared with
the energy injected by SN, in some cases. \citet{Ramsey2006} studied the
interstellar environment of seven HMXBs, showing that to understand the
ionization and kinematics of the super-shells around these sources, it is
necessary that HMXBs contribute with a significant amount of kinetic energy.
Several works indicate that the energy deposited by BHXs in the form of
kinetic energy could be as high as their bolometric X-ray luminosities
\citep{Gallo2005,Pakull2010,Feng2011,Soria2014}.
Based on these observational evidences, \citet{Justham2012}
conclude that the early injection of energy by these sources
could heat up the ambient gas without expelling it from the galaxy, preventing
the early transformation of gas into stars, and changing the properties of the
ISM where SN events will take place. As we mentioned before, the main impact of
this process is expected to occur at high redshift, where low-metallicity
sources prevail.
In this paper, we implement for the first time, a BHX feedback model within cosmological
hydrodynamical simulation, in a self-consistent way. Our
simulations include a chemical evolution model \citep{Scannapieco2005} and a
physically-motivated SN feedback \citep{Scannapieco2006}, therefore the enrichment of
baryons can be followed as galaxies are assembled. Hence, our simulations allows us to describe the metallicity
dependence of the sources along the Hubble time. This
gives us a further insight into this problem, by providing the self-consistent
evolution of the gas cooling, the transformation of gas into stars and
the stellar evolution, with the subsequent chemical enrichment of the
baryons.
We will consider very low-metallicity stars as BHX progenitors, since they are
expected to be most energetic and abundant. We explore the effect of BHX
feedback on the cosmic star formation history and on the properties of galaxies
within haloes of different masses. Our results are in agreement to
those reported by \citet{Justham2012} where a semi-analytical model is
developed to study the effects of BHX feedback.
This paper is summarized as follows. In Sect.~\ref{cosm_sim} we describe the
numerical simulations and the implementation of BHX feedback. In Sect.~\ref{s_csfr} we explore the effects of this feedback on the cosmic star formation
history, while in Sect.~\ref{eff_gxy} we study its effect on simulated
galaxies. Finally, we present our main conclusions in Sect.~\ref{concl}.
\section{Numerical Methodology}\label{cosm_sim}
In this section, we describe the main
characteristics of the cosmological code, the simulations, and the model developed to incorporate the
BHXs self-consistently in the numerical code.
\subsection{The cosmological code}\label{mod_gen}
We use an extended version of the TreePM/SPH code {\small P-GADGET-3} \citep{Springel2005},
which includes a multiphase model for the gas component, metal-dependent
cooling and SN feedback as described by \citet{Scannapieco2005,Scannapieco2006}.
The multiphase scheme allows the coexistence of low- and high-density gas
clouds, diminishing the problems of over-smoothing of standard SPH. The
main difference is that neighbouring particles are selected not only by a
distance criterion, but also by considering their relative entropy. The
decisions are made on a particle-particle basis, which implies no
mass-dependent parameters to be fixed
\citep[see][for details]{Scannapieco2006}. The multiphase model works
coherently with the SN feedback model, which includes Type II and Type Ia SN
events (hereafter, SNII and SNIa, respectively). When SN events are produced,
metals and energy are distributed within the hot and cold gaseous phases
surrounding the star particle representing a single stellar population.
The cold phase of the star particle is defined by gas particles with $T < 2 T_{*}$ and
$\rho > 0.1 \rho_{*}$, while the rest of the gas determines the hot phase
($\rho_{*} = 7 \times 10^{-26}\,{\rm g\,cm^{-3}}$ and
$T_{*} = 4 \times 10^{4}$~K, see \citealt{Scannapieco2006} for a detailed
discussion on these parameters). The fraction of energy distributed into the
cold phase is defined by the parameter $\epsilon_{\rm c}$. An exploration of
this parameter and its effects is given by \citet{Scannapieco2006,Scannapieco2008}. Here, we
adopt $\epsilon_{\rm c} = 0.5$ as it has been done in previous works which used
this SN feedback model \citep{Scannapieco2009,DeRossi2013,Pedrosa2014}.
Note that these cold and hot gaseous phases are defined for the stellar
populations where SN events are estimated to be produced, and for the only
purpose of distributing metals and energy. They have no direct relation with the
SPH integration itself. Hot gas particles thermalize immediately the SN energy
they receive, whereas cold gas particles build up an energy reservoir. The
feedback energy is stored in these reservoirs until gas particles have enough
energy to change their entropy in order to match that of their surrounding hot
neighbour media. When this occurs, the reservoir energy is pumped into the
internal energy. This SN scheme is able to produce powerful, mass-loaded
galactic winds as has been shown in previous works
\citep[e.g.][]{Scannapieco2008,Scannapieco2009}.
Stars more massive than $8 M_{\odot}$ are considered as SNII progenitors. We estimate the number of SNII by adopting the
Initial Mass Function (IMF) of \citet{Chabrier2003}. For SNIa, we use the
simple model of \citet{Mosconi2001} where the SNIa rate is estimated by
adopting an observationally motivated ratio ($\sim 0.0015$). The lifetimes of
SNIa progenitors are randomly selected within the range [0.1--1]~Gyr. This model,
albeit simple, allows a good representation of the chemical patterns of the
stellar populations \citep{Jimenez2014}. The initial chemical composition of
the gas component is assumed to be primordial ($X_{\rm H} = 0.76$, $X_{\rm He}
= 0.24$). The chemical model follows the enrichment by twelve isotopes:
$^1$H, $^2$He, $^{12}$C, $^{16}$O, $^{24}$Mg, $^{28}$Si, $^{56}$Fe, $^{14}$N,
$^{20}$Ne, $^{32}$S, $^{40}$Ca and $^{62}$Zn.
For SNIa we adopt the nucleosynthesis model of \citet{Iwamoto1999} and for SNII that of \citet{Woosley1995}. Chemical elements are distributed in a
similar fashion as the energy, although 80\% of the new elements are dumped
into the cold phase (i.e. $20 \%$ goes into the hot phase). The cooling functions are metal-dependent \citep{SD93}.
\subsubsection{Numerical experiments}
The simulated volumes represent 14~Mpc comoving-side boxes, and are
consistent with the cosmology $\Lambda$-CDM with $\Omega_{\Lambda}=0.7$, $\Omega_{\rm m}=0.3$,
$\Omega_{\rm b} = 0.04$, $\sigma_{8}=0.9$, and
$H_{0}=100 h\,{\rm~Mpc^{-1}~km\,s^{-1}}$ with $h=0.7$. Although this is not the
current favourite set of cosmological parameters, we use it because it allow us
to compare these simulations with previous ones. The variation of the
cosmological parameters will not affect the conclusions of this work, which is
related to the effects of feedback on the properties of the ISM and the
regulation of star formation within individual galaxies. For this purpose, we
compare runs of the same initial conditions but with different feedback
mechanisms.
Initially, the simulations contain $230^3$ dark matter particles and
$230^3$ gas particles (we will refer to these simulations as S230).
The dark matter and initial gas particle masses are
$\sim 9.1 \times 10^{6} \, M_{\odot}$ and $\sim 1.3 \times 10^{6}\, M_{\odot}$.
The adopted gravitational softening length is $1.24~h^{-1}$~kpc.
S230 runs were followed down to $z=0$, but we focus the
analysis on $z > 4$.
Higher numerical resolution runs of $2\times 320^3$ particles were also
performed to investigate the dependence on mass resolution
(we will refer to these simulations as S320). The dark
matter and initial gas mass in this case are $\sim 3.1\times 10^{6} \,
M_{\odot}$ and $\sim 4.9\times 10^{5}\, M_{\odot}$, and the gravitational
softening length is $0.5 h^{-1}$~kpc.
These simulations were run down to $z\sim 7$ due to their high
computational cost. We adopted the same star formation and feedback
parameters used in S230. As a consequence, the star formation
activity starts at higher redshift since smaller systems are better
resolved. As a result, the impact of BHXs occurs also at higher
redshift in S320 than in S230. Nevertheless, this behaviour does not affect our
analysis since we are always comparing runs with and without BHX
feedback with the same resolution to draw conclusions.
We have run the same initial condition with SN feedback (S230-SN and
S320-SN) and with SN+BHX feedback (S230-BHX and S320-BHX) in order to assess
the effects clearly.
Although in this work, we only discuss the most successful
implementation, we have run the same initial conditions varying the parameters
of the BHX models, as explained in the following section.
\subsection{The stellar feedback model for BH-HMXBs}\label{feed}
We are interested in studying the effects of the kinematic feedback of BHXs
originated from very low-metallicity progenitors. As these metal-poor
progenitors are expected to form principally in the Early
Universe, their contribution should be relevant for the regulation of the star
formation in the early stages of galaxy evolution. As mentioned in the
Introduction, we considered previous results from
\citet{Power2009} and \citet{Justham2012} to develop our
model, which is fully implemented within our SPH code.
We will consider BHX populations rather than individual sources due to
the numerical resolution of our simulations.
We assume that massive stars
with metallicities in the range $Z_{\rm EMP} = [0,10^{-4}$) will give origin to \textit{extremely metal-poor}
progenitors of BHXs (see below for more details). This metallicity range is taken as indicative, since there is no clear
theoretical or observational value to be used. Nevertheless, theoretical works predict larger formation
rates for $Z < 0.01 Z_\odot$ \citep[e.g.][]{Linden2010}.
The upper limit
represents the characteristic value of the oldest Population II stars \citep{Belczynski2004a}.
We would like to stress that although the upper metallicity limit was selected with this criterion,
sensitive variations should not affect strongly our results.
Note also that we are not modelling Pop~III stars. We assume our sources to be very low metallicity stars but
not representative of the first stars. Pop~III sources are beyond the scope of
this paper and would demand the treatment of other physical mechanisms
which are not included in our code \citep[e.g.][]{Chen2014}. Our
model includes the $Z = 0$ stellar populations since there are not efficient
mixing processes within the SPH kernel. Their treatment
should increase the metallicity floor quickly from $Z = 0$.
In order to estimate the number of BHs produced in each young stellar population, we adopt
the model of \citet{Georgy2009} for the evolution of massive stars. This model includes stellar rotation
and a dependence of the type of compact remnant on the metallicity of
the progenitor. The fraction of massive stars that end their life as BHs increases with decreasing metallicity.
Therefore, for each young stellar population we estimate the number of
BHs produced by adopting the IMF of \citet{Chabrier2003}. We consider
stellar masses in the range of $30-120 M_{\odot}$ and metallicities
consistent with the defined $Z_{\rm EMP}$ interval.
We assume that $\sim 20\%$ of low-metallicity BHs will end up in binary systems,
producing a BHX ($f^{\rm EMP}_{\rm BHX}=0.20$). This value is roughly
comparable to the $30~\% $ reported
by \citet{Power2009}, after correcting by the different IMF
adopted.
As we mentioned before, in BHXs the BH accretes mass from its companion star releasing
a significant amount of energy in the form of radiation and outflows.
Observational evidence from shock-ionized bubbles in the environment
of these sources ($\sim$~50--300~pc) suggests that their mechanical output energy
would be around $\sim10^{52}\,{\rm erg}$ \citep{Soria2014}.
On the other hand, many authors have reported that the kinetical power from accreting black holes
could be as high as their Eddington luminosity limit \citep{Pakull2003,Pakull2010}.
For example, for Cygnus~X-1 \citet{Gallo2005} have found that its jet
transforms its total power into kinetic energy, and that the latter could be greater than its
bolometric X-ray luminosity.
Similar results have been found by \citet{Soria2010} for the microquasar S26 in NGC~7793, and
by \citet{Soria2014} for an accreting BH in M83.
Motivated by these observations, we assume that the energy deposited by low-metallicity
BHXs in the form of kinetic energy is $E_{\rm BHX} = 10^{52}\,{\rm erg}$ \citep{Mirabel2011,Feng2011}.
Assuming that a similar amount of energy is radiated in the X-ray band
during $\sim 3\,{\rm Myr}$, the mean X-ray luminosity per source is
$L_{\rm X, source} \sim 10^{38}\,{\rm erg \, s}^{-1}$, which is typical of HMXBs.
We also tested larger and smaller energy values. Energies of the order of
$E_{\rm BHX} = 10^{53}\,{\rm erg}$ sweep the gas in haloes too efficiently while
lower values ($E_{\rm BHX} \sim 10^{51}\,{\rm erg}$) produce no significant impact on the
regulation of the star formation activity.
Hence, for each young stellar population with metallicity in the range $Z_{\rm EMP}=[0,10^{-4})$,
we estimate the number of BHXs as $N_{\rm BHX}=f^{\rm EMP}_{\rm BHX}\times N_{\rm BH}(Z)$
where $N_{\rm BH}(Z)$ is the number of BHs produced according to \citet{Georgy2009} and $f^{\rm EMP}_{\rm BHX}=0.20$,
as we discussed before.
Each of these $N_{\rm BHX}$ sources releases $E_{\rm BHX} =
10^{52}\,{\rm erg}$ into the ISM. We assume that this energy will be
efficiently thermalized by the surrounding gas clouds where the
the events took place. This hypothesis is supported by observational evidences that show that these events are expected to affect the region
surrounding the stellar progenitors \citep[$\sim 300$~pc,
e.g.][]{Pakull2010}. As a consequence, the released energy is dumped into the
internal energy of the nearby cold gas phase, contributing to build up their
energy reservoir.
\section{The cosmic star formation rate density} \label{s_csfr}
The SN and BHX feedback mechanisms modify the thermodynamical properties
of the ISM, thus affecting the transformation of gas into
stars, which is the main effect we analyse in this paper.
In order to have a global picture of their impact, we estimate the cosmic star formation rate density
(cSFR) for both simulations, S230-SN and S230-BHX. As shown in Fig.~\ref{cSFR},
the confrontation of the cSFR with observational results compiled by
\citet{Behroozi2013} suggests that the treatment of BHX feedback worked in the
expected way, yielding an improved description of the observations.
The factor $f^{\rm EMP}_{\rm BHX} \sim 0.20$ was actually chosen to be able to represent this
observational relation\footnote{For the adopted $E_{\rm BHX} =
10^{52}\,{\rm erg}$, we tested $f^{\rm EMP}_{\rm BHX}$ between $\sim
1\%$ and $\sim 20 \%$, finding $f^{\rm EMP}_{\rm BHX} \sim 0.20$
reproduced the observed trend (Fig.~\ref{cSFR}).}. However, this factor might vary if the $E_{\rm BHX}$ is
changed accordingly so that the total amount of released energy per
population remains within the same values. Otherwise, the effects on
the ISM are found to be too weak or too strong. The fact that it agrees roughly with
that derived by \citet{Power2009} is encouraging.
\begin{figure}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth]{cSFR_new_nolog_PAPER.ps}
\caption{The cosmic star formation rate density estimated from simulations with
SN feedback (S230-SN, blue dashed line) and with both SN and BHX
feedbacks (S230-BHX, red solid line). For comparison, the observations compiled by \citet{Behroozi2013}
are also included (black filled circles). The two runs share the same
cosmology, and the SF and SN feedback parameters. The cosmic SFR is diminished by
BHX feedback at early epochs ($z \gtrsim 7$) through cold gas heating, and
boosted at lower redshift as more gas is available to feed the star
formation activity.}
\label{cSFR}
\end{figure}
In order to understand the combined effects of the two feedback mechanisms, in Fig.~\ref{energy2b} (upper panel),
we show the comoving energy density ($e$) released
by SNII and BHXs, as a function of redshift,
for both S230-SN and S230-BHX. We only considered SNII contributions since they
also originate from massive stars. SNIa events will also contribute but with
a larger time-scale and lower rate.
Both the SNII and the BHX energy contributions grow with redshift, due to
the increasing cosmic star formation activity. However, BHX energy feedback
grows at a slower rate than SNII one, due to the metallicity
dependence of the progenitors. As the metallicity of
the ISM increases, the number of BHX events diminishes, making
SNe the dominating feedback mechanism.
As can be seen from Fig.~\ref{energy2b}, BHX feedback is
significant for $z > 7$. As an example, at $z \gtrsim 7$ it represents $\sim 30\%$ of the total
energy (SNII+BHX) released into the ISM. For lower redshift, the contribution of BHX
feedback progressively decays, reaching less than $\sim 10\%$ of the
total at $z \sim 4$ ($\sim5\% $ at $z \sim 2$).
The total $e$ released by SNII and BHX together is comparable to that of S230-SN for $z
\gtrsim 7$, while for lower
redshift, that of S230-BXH is greater due to the SFR enhancement
triggered in this simulation, as can be seen in
Fig.~\ref{cSFR}\footnote{The impact of BHX feedback on the global SF
activity when the numerical resolution is increased is similar,
although as explained before, S320 runs formed more stars for the
same set of SN and SF parameters (see Section 2.1.1). By comparing the energy
released by BHX
and SNII events in S320-SN and S320-BHX, we found a maximum of $\sim
30\%$ contribution from BHX feedback, that decays
rapidly with redshift as the ISMs are chemically enriched, in a
similar fashion as
reported for S230 in Section 3. The specific redshift at which BHX feedback is maximum
over SNII feedback is a statement which depends on the box-size.
Our simulated box correspond to a small field region, so a larger volume will be
required to make a full statement on this aspect.}. We will come back to this point later on.
\begin{figure}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth]{LOGESN_Ehmxb_z_chabr_1e7yr_dossimus_mod.ps}
\caption{{\it Upper panel:} Comoving energy density released by different feedback mechanisms
as a function of redshift: SNII in S230-SN (magenta solid line), SNII in
SN230-BHX (green dashed line), and BHXs in S230-BHX (blue dot-dashed line).
The total comoving energy density released by all agents in S230-BHXs (BHXs~+~SNe) is also plotted
(red dotted line). BHXs release a significant amount of energy, of $\sim$30\%
of the SNII+BHX feedback at $z\gtrsim7$, but its fractional contribution decays for
lower redshifts, down to $\sim$10\% at $z\sim4$. {\it Lower panel:} Same as
above, but taking into account only the energy injected into the cold gas phase
of the ISM. The contribution of BHXs is larger in this case because they dump
all their energy into the cold phase.}
\label{energy2b}
\end{figure}
The SNII and BHX energy release should affect the regulation of
the star formation in different ways, depending on the energy available to heat
up the cold gas clumps where stars are born. Fig.~\ref{energy2b} (lower panel) displays the
energy released by SNII and BHXs to the cold gas phase, as a function of
redshift. For S230-BHX, the amount of energy dumped by BXHs at high redshift
is similar to that of SNII. The total amount of feedback into the cold gas is
then larger in S230-BHX than in S230-SN, producing an early heating of the gas
that diminishes the star formation activity. In fact, this can be appreciated
from the cSFR, shown in Fig.~\ref{cSFR}
for both simulations. As expected, in S230-BHX the BHX feedback diminishes the
star formation activity for $z \gtrsim 7$ with respect to that of S230-SN,
because it provides a larger amount of energy used directly in cold gas
heating. The lower star formation rate in S230-BHX also explains the lower SNII
feedback in this simulation (Fig.~\ref{energy2b}). We note that the star
formation activity in S230-BHX increases for $z < 7$ faster than in S230-SN,
reaching values comparable to observations \citep{Behroozi2013}. Hence,
the impact of BHXs on the regulation of the star formation is boosted to lower
redshift by making gas available to star formation at late times.
\section{The effects of BHX feedback on simulated galaxies} \label{eff_gxy}
In order to assess the effects of BHX feedback on the regulation of the
star formation in galaxies of different masses, we first constructed
galaxy catalogues from S230-SN and S230-BHX.
We use the Friends-of-Friends technique to select the virialized structures, and
the {\sc subfind} algorithm \citep{Springel2001} to identify the
substructures within
the virial radii. We only consider simulated galaxies resolved with
more than 500 particles. In order to test the robustness of our results against
numerical resolution, we run a higher numerical resolution initial condition increasing the mass resolution by a factor of eight. We acknowledge the fact
that our simulated volume is small to provide a complete
description of the galaxy populations. However, by comparing the same
initial condition run with different feedback agents, we are able to underpin the effects of these agents within the mass range of $\sim 10^9 - 10^{11}\, M_{\odot}$. Hence, the analysis should
be taken on individual galaxy basis, and as a first step toward
understanding the impact of BHXs as a possible feedback mechanism.
We carry out an analysis of the simulated galaxies from $z\sim 9$ to
$z\sim 4$. For each available snapshot of the simulations, simulated galaxies are defined at the optical radius which corresponds
to that enclosing $83 \%$ of the baryonic mass of the selected
system. The dark matter halo masses are calculated at
the virial radius.
\subsection{The stellar-to-dark mass ratio}\label{msmh_res}
First, we study the ratio between the mean stellar mass and their virial
halo mass of the simulated galaxies as a function of the latter. The estimated relations for S230-SN and
S230-BHX are shown in Fig.~\ref{mh_ms}. For comparison, we also show the
results obtained using the abundance matching technique by \citet{Behroozi2013}
at redshift $z \sim 7, 5, 4 $, and by \citet{Moster2013} at redshift
$z \sim 4$. In the case of \citet{Moster2013} data, we extrapolate their
stellar-to-halo mass relation to lower halo masses.
We note that the simulations tend to resolve smaller virial haloes compared to
those shown by \citet{Behroozi2013}, except for $z \sim 7$ where there is a
better match of the mass range. Therefore, we extrapolate the trends to draw
conclusions.
At $z \sim 7$, there is an excess of stars in small haloes in S230-SN
compared to those detected in S230-BHX. This excess originates in the very efficient
transformation of gas into stars at the early stages of evolution in
S230-SN as also reported in
previous works \citep[e.g.][]{Sawala2011,DeRossi2013}. Although our SN
feedback model is successful at producing galactic outflows and fountains,
which regulate the star formation, it is less efficient in the first
stages of galaxy formation.
When the energy released by BHXs is added to the SN feedback,
then a decrease in the star formation activity at high redshift is detected. In Fig.~\ref{energy2b}, we
compared the relative importance of both feedback mechanisms as a function of
redshift. In Fig.~\ref{mh_ms} we can appreciate the effects on
individual galaxies. In fact, the regulation of the star
formation by BHX events is more efficient in low mass haloes, steepening the
relation between the stellar-to-halo mass ratio and the halo mass of the
galaxies. In haloes less massive than $\sim 10^{10}\, M_\odot$, simulated
galaxies in S230-BHX have less stellar mass than those in S230-SN. For larger
halo masses instead, the simulated galaxies in S230-BHX reach larger fractions
of stars compared to the SN feedback run. This trend is produced because
simulated galaxies in these haloes have larger amount of gas to feed
the subsequent star
formation process. This can be explained as a consequence of the impact of
BHXs at early times, when the systems were smaller and could be affected by BHX
feedback.
We note that although the cSFR of S230-BHX reproduces the observations compiled
by \citet{Behroozi2013}, there seems to be still more stars per dark
matter halo at $z \lesssim 7$. However, the slope of stellar-to-halo mass
relation agrees better to the extrapolation of observations for lower masses.
This is also valid when compared to \citet{Moster2013} at $z \sim 4$.
\begin{figure}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.4\textwidth]{MsMh_Mh_z_7.0_PAPER.ps}
\includegraphics[width=0.4\textwidth]{MsMh_Mh_z_5.0_PAPER.ps}
\includegraphics[width=0.4\textwidth]{MsMh_Mh_z_4.0_PAPER.ps}
\caption{Mean stellar-to-halo mass ratio as a function of halo mass,
for redshifts $z \sim 7 $, 5 and 4. We estimate the stellar mass of a galaxy as
the total mass of stellar particles inside the optical radius. Dashed lines
represent galaxies in S230-SN, while solid lines show those in S230-BHX.
The results of abundance matching techniques taken from \citet{Behroozi2013} are
plotted in black as open squares plus a dotted line. For $z \sim 4$ we include
also the extrapolation of the data of \citet{Moster2013}
(dash-dotted red line).}
\label{mh_ms}
\end{figure}
\subsection{Gas fractions} \label{gas_res}
The impact of the SN and BHX feedback on the stellar mass of galaxies can be also
studied by comparing the ratio between the mean gas mass and the virial halo mass.
Fig.~\ref{mg_mh} shows this relation as a function of the halo mass
for galaxies in S230-BHX and S230-SN, and for the same redshift range
displayed in
Fig.~\ref{mh_ms}. The gas mass of the simulated galaxies is estimated as the
total mass of gas particles inside their optical radii.
As can be seen from Fig.~\ref{mg_mh}, simulated galaxies in S230-BHX have higher
gas masses than those in the simulation without BHX feedback, regardless of
their host haloes. At $z \sim 7$, we detect the smaller gas fraction in S230-SN
for $M_{\rm h} > 10^{10}\, M_\odot$. This result seems to be at odds with the
trends shown in Fig.~\ref{mh_ms}, under the hypothesis of a close-box
model. Indeed, if
there were no gas infall or outflow, then the galaxies with the larger stellar
mass fraction should have had the smaller gas fraction. However, this is not what
we see in Fig.~\ref{mg_mh}.
The fact that galaxies in S230-BHX have larger fraction of gas within their
optical radii suggests that their counterparts in S230-SN have lost larger fractions of
their gas reservoirs and hence, the subsequent star formation is lower. If
this were the case, then galactic outflows should have carried out more material
to the circumgalactic medium (CGM) of these galaxies, increasing its
temperature.
\begin{figure}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth]{MgMh_Mh_PAPER.ps}
\caption{Gas-to-halo mass ratio as a function of halo mass for simulated
galaxies in S230-BHX (solid lines) and S230-SN (dashed lines). The relations
are shown for three different redshifts: $z = 7$ (green triangles), 5 (blue
squares), and 4 (violet circles). Gas mass is estimated as the total mass of gas particles enclosed
within the optical radius of a galaxy at a given redshift.}
\label{mg_mh}
\end{figure}
In order to analyse this feedback loop between the ISM and the CGM of
the simulated galaxies, we estimate the fraction of the total gas mass
within the virial radius which remains within the optical radius in
both simulations. As can be
seen in Fig.~\ref{mg_mh2}, in S230-BHX, simulated galaxies in haloes
with virial masses in the range $10^{10} \, M_\odot \lesssim M_{\rm h} \lesssim 10^{11} \,
M_\odot$ are able to retain larger amounts
of gas than their counterparts in S230-SN. For smaller and larger haloes,
both simulations show the same level of remnant gas within the
optical radius. In the quoted
halo-mass range, galaxies in S230-SN have been able to loose a
larger fraction of gas, which can be understood considering their higher
early star-formation activity. As a consequence, gas outflows are
triggered, expelling larger amount of gas.
This produces a decrease of the star formation activity afterwards
since there is less gas to fuel it. In fact, as shown in Fig.~\ref{cSFR}, the star
formation activity of S230-SN at low redshift remains lower than that estimated
by \citet{Behroozi2013}, whereas it is higher at high redshift. Hence, this suggests that it will
not be possible to reach an agreement if only SN feedback is present \citep[see also][]{Stinson2012}. Increasing
the SN feedback to decrease the star formation at high redshift would make
the discrepancy at lower redshift even larger. It is the action of the
BHX feedback that helps to regulate the star formation at very high
redshifts, which then results in the desired trend at lower ones.
\begin{figure}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth]{MgRoptDMgRvir_PRUEBA.ps}
\caption{Fraction of the total gas within the virial radius retained
within the optical radius, for simulated galaxies in S230-BHX (solid
lines) and in S230-SN (dashed lines) at $z = 7$ (green triangles), 5 (blue
squares), and 4 (violet circles).}
\label{mg_mh2}
\end{figure}
As we can see from Fig.~\ref{mh_ms}, there seems to be a halo mass threshold
below which BHXs are efficient at modulating the
star formation. This is approximately $M_{\rm h} \sim 10^{10}\, M_\odot$,
which corresponds to circular velocities $V_{\rm vir} \sim 40\, {\rm km \, s}^{-1}$ or a
virial temperature of $T_{\rm vir} \sim 50,000\, {\rm K}$ (assuming primordial
abundances). For galaxies below this threshold,
the BHX feedback is strong enough to heat the ISM to $T \sim T_{\rm vir} $, decreasing the
star formation activity without expelling a significant fraction of gas mass.
To illustrate this, in Fig.~\ref{temper} we show the mean temperature of the gas within the optical
(left panels) and the virial (right panels) radius, for simulated galaxies in
both runs, at $z \sim 7$ and $z \sim 5$. The run with BHXs shows hotter
environment within the optical radius, although with temperatures smaller
than $T_{\rm vir}$. Conversely, galaxies in S230-SN have lost
gas by SN feedback. In fact, SN feedback has been successful at
building a hot CGM even at these high redshifts.
The CGMs are colder in the run with S230-BHX, since the total
stellar mass formed per halo is not enough to drive powerful winds yet.
The BHX feedback has contributed to heat up the gas within the galaxies,
decreasing the mass of
new-born stars in haloes with $M_{\rm h} < 10^{10} \, M_\odot$. Therefore, as they
grow by hierarchical clustering, they will be able to have larger gas
reservoirs to continue their star formation activity.
Later on, as the SN rate increases, the SN feedback contributes to heat
up the CGM of galaxies in S230-BHX.
\begin{figure*}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{TempRopt_Mvir_z7.0_PAPER.ps}
\includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{TempRvir_Mvir_z7.0_PAPER.ps}
\includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{TempRopt_Mvir_z5.0_PAPER.ps}
\includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{TempRvir_Mvir_z5.0_PAPER.ps}
\caption{Median temperatures of the gas component within the optical
radius (left panels) and within the virial radius (right panels), for
galaxies in S230-BHX and S230-SN at $z = 7$ and $z = 5$.
The dotted lines represent the relation between virial mass and virial temperature.
Note that at $z = 7$, simulated galaxies in S230-BHX have
hotter interstellar media than their counterparts in
S230-SN. Conversely, the circumgalactic media of galaxies in S230-SN
get hotter sooner, as a consequence of the hot material transported by
outflows. These outflows are triggered by the more violent SN feedback,
produced by the larger SFR taken place in this run at very high redshift.}
\label{temper}
\end{figure*}
\subsection{The stellar mass of galaxies}
\label{stellarmass}
To assess how the effects of BHX feedback modifies the
stellar mass of galaxies, we estimate
the cumulative number of galaxies as a function of their stellar
mass.
As it can be seen from Fig.~\ref{histogramas}, the simulations behave
differently. The simulation with BHX feedback shows a notable evolution
with redshift, with $\sim 80\% $ of the galaxies exhibiting stellar masses
smaller than $10^7 \, M_\odot$ at $z \sim 7$, percentage which decreases
to $\sim 50\%$ at $z \sim 4$.
Conversely, the simulation with only SN feedback does not present
a clear evolution in this redshift range. On average, $\sim 50-60\%$ of the
galaxies have stellar masses smaller than $\sim 10^7 \, M_\odot$.
These trends confirm that galaxies in S230-BHX form less stars in
small galaxies than those in S230-SN.
Hence, BHX thermal feedback affects directly small galaxies but indirectly
larger ones.
Those mostly affected have stellar masses between $10^7$ and $10^8$
$M_\odot$ and inhabit haloes with $V_{\rm vir} \sim 40$ km~s$^{-1}$.
\begin{figure*}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.4\textwidth]{histo_acum_Ms_Chabrier_PAPER.ps}
\includegraphics[width=0.4\textwidth]{histo_acum_Ms_Chabrier_Cold5_PAPER.ps}
\caption{Cumulative distribution of the stellar mass within the optical
radius at $z\sim 7$ (green dashed line), $z\sim 5$ (blue dotted line) and $z \sim 4$ (violet solid line).
\textit{Left:} Simulation without BHX feedback. \textit{Right:} Simulation with BHX feedback.}
\label{histogramas}
\end{figure*}
\subsection{Testing numerical resolution}
\label{s320_res}
In order to test the robustness of our trends against numerical resolution,
we analyse the simulated galaxies in S320-SN and S320-BHX at $z\sim 7.5$ and $z\sim 8$.
Galaxies have been selected and analysed
by using the same criteria, although the minimum number of particles was
increased to 2000 in order to avoid including very small systems which
were not considered in S230-BHX.
In Fig.~\ref{ms_mh_320} we show the stellar-to-virial mass relation in a
similar fashion as in Fig.~\ref{mh_ms}. The relations for galaxies in S320-BHX and S320-SN cross
each other at about $M_{\rm h} \sim 10^{10} \, M_\odot$ in agreement
with the trends found in the S230 runs.
Even more, the cumulative distribution of stellar mass also exhibits a
similar trend to those found in S230 (Fig. ~\ref{histogramas}).
And as a consequence, this agreement between the low and high resolution runs suggest that the results are
numerically robust.
\begin{figure}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.4\textwidth]{320-MsMh_Mh_z_7.5_PAPER.ps}
\includegraphics[width=0.4\textwidth]{320-MsMh_Mh_z_8.0_PAPER.ps}
\caption{Mean stellar-to-virial mass relation at $z = 7$ and $z = 8$, for
simulated galaxies in S320-SN (dashed lines) and S320-BHX (solid lines).
The results of abundance matching technique from \citet{Behroozi2013}
are included (dotted line plus empty squares). The main impact of BHX feedback occurs for $M_{\rm h} <10^{10} \, M_\odot$, in agreement with results found for
S230-BHX.}
\label{ms_mh_320}
\end{figure}
\subsection{Contribution of X-ray photons} \label{phot_res}
As already discussed, the rate and X-ray luminosity of BHXs are expected to be
highly related to the metallicity of the progenitor stars as suggested by observational and theoretical studies.
Due to the long-mean
free path of X-ray photons, BHXs could contribute significantly to
the heating
and ionization of the IGM at early stages of galaxy evolution
\citep[e.g.][]{Mirabel2011,Jeon2013,Power2013,Knevitt2014}. \citet{Mirabel2011} show how
the evolution of the temperature of the low-density neutral IGM due to
heating by X-rays from BHXs may depend on the value of the parameter $f_{\rm X}$.
This parameter is defined as the ratio of the total X-ray luminosity $L_{\rm X}$
of a galaxy in the 2--10~keV band to its SFR, and its value can be estimated
from the expression
\begin{equation}
\label{fx}
f_{\rm X} = (3.5 \times 10^{40}\, {\rm SFR})^{-1} L_{\rm X},
\end{equation}
\noindent
where $L_{\rm X}$ is measured in ${\rm erg \, s}^{-1}$ and the SFR in
$M_\odot\,{\rm yr}^{-1}$. An increase of $f_{\rm X}$ would cause the neutral IGM to be
heated earlier due to the presence of BHXs. This could limit the cold gas accretion in dwarf galaxies at high
redshift.
Although the detailed analysis of X-ray feedback of BHXs into the IGM is out of the
scope of this work, we estimate the value of $f_{\rm X}$ using our model for
extremely metal-poor BHXs in order to evaluate its compatibility with
expectations from other models. The emission of these BHXs should dominate the X-ray
luminosity of star-forming galaxies mainly at high redshift when most young stellar
populations were metal-poor. In any case, our predicted $f_{\rm X}$
represents a lower limit, resulting in a conservative contribution to
radiative feedback in the early Universe.
Assuming that BHXs radiate a similar amount of energy in
X-ray luminosity to that injected in kinematic outflows (i.e.
$\epsilon_{\rm X} = E_{\rm BHX} = 10^{52}\, {\rm erg}$), and a mean
emission time of $\sim 3$ Myr, the mean X-ray
luminosity per source as $L_{\rm X} \sim 10^{38}\,{\rm erg \, s}^{-1}$, as already mentioned in Section 2.2.
If the number of BHXs produced in a galaxy is $N_{\rm BHX}$, then the mean total X-ray
luminosity of a simulated galaxy originated from BHXs is $L_{\rm X}^{\rm G} = N_{\rm BHX} L_{\rm X}$,
which can be easily computed at each time step of the
simulation. To make a proper comparison with \citet{Mirabel2011}, we use
the galaxy catalogue of S320-BHX at $z \sim 9$.
These simulated galaxies have
${\rm SFR}$ and $L_{\rm X}^{\rm G}$ in the range $[0.01-20]\, M_{\odot} {\rm yr^{-1}}$ and
$[10^{39}-10^{41}]{\rm erg\, s}^{-1}$, respectively. Hence, the mean $f_{\rm X}$ value
obtained at $z \sim 9$ is $\langle f_{\rm X} \rangle = 0.65$.
Note that the total X-ray luminosities of simulated galaxies
do not exceed the X-ray luminosity limit of the deepest surveys \citep[4~Ms Chandra Deep Field-South ---CDF-S---,][]{Xue2011}.
At $z \sim 9$, the 2--10~keV rest
frame energy band corresponds roughly to the observed soft band
0.2--1~keV. The flux limit of the 4~Ms CDF-S in the soft band is $9.1 \times 10^{-18} {\rm erg\,cm^{-2}\,s}^{-1}$,
therefore the (k-corrected) luminosity limit at
$z \sim 9$ is $L_{\rm X, lim} \sim 4.6 \times 10^{42} \,{\rm erg \, s}^{-1}$.
Hence, our BHXs model does not contradict the upper limits imposed by current surveys.
The $\langle f_{\rm X} \rangle$ value obtained does not take into account the absorption of
X-ray photons before reaching the IGM.
A rough estimation of the fraction of escaping photons into the IGM
could be obtained by adopting a power law spectral
energy distribution for the sources, with an index of $1.7$ in the
0.5--10~keV range \citep{Swartz2004}.
We calculate this fraction for a typical halo of $M_{\rm h}=10^{8}\,
M_{\odot}$, assuming an exponential surface density for the galaxy.
We assume that the ratio of the baryonic-to-dark-matter mass is
$m_{\rm d} = 0.17$, the spin parameter is $\lambda \sim 0.03$ and
$j_{\rm d} / m_{\rm d} = 1$, where $j_{\rm d}$ is the ratio of the
angular momentum of baryons to that of the halo \citep[][]{Mo1998, Fernandez2011}.
Considering that X-ray photons would ionize both hydrogen and helium in the
IGM, we use the cross sections of \citet{Kuhlen2005}.
The estimated escape fraction is then $f_{\rm esc} \sim 0.53$. Therefore, the
effective $\langle f_{\rm X} \rangle$
would be $\langle f_{\rm X} \rangle_{\rm eff} \sim 0.34$ at redshift $z \sim 9$.
This value is lower than that proposed by
\citet{Mirabel2011} where $f_{\rm esc} \sim 1.0$ is assumed. Our simple estimation
implies that the generated X-ray photons could barely heat the
temperature of the IGM above $10^{3}\,{\rm K}$.
However, our estimations are too crude to draw more
robust conclusions on this aspect. This effect can be studied with radiative transfer models in detail
\citep[e.g.][]{Knevitt2014}.
\section{Conclusions} \label{concl}
In this work, we explore the effects of HMXBs composed by an accreting black hole
on galaxy evolution \citep{Justham2012}.
Following previous results, our model assumes that the rate, X-ray luminosity and
outflow energy of BHXs
increase for low metallicity progenitors
\citep{Dray2006,Linden2010}.
The BHX feedback model is grafted into a version of {\small P-GADGET-3}
which includes SN feedback and chemical evolution
\citep{Scannapieco2006}, so that its effects can be studied as the structure forms and evolves.
The estimated kinetic energy released by BHXs is assumed to be
efficiently thermalized and hence, is pumped into the cold gaseous phase in
the surrounding region of the
sources. This extra source of energy has an impact on the properties of the ISM at early
stages of evolution and in low-velocity haloes. Encouragingly, our results agree with
those reported by \citep{Justham2012} where a semi-analytical model
was used to implement a scheme based on similar hypotheses.
Our results can be summarized as follows:
\begin{itemize}
\item
Following observations which
indicate that the kinetic energy deposited by these sources might
be comparable to that radiated in the X-ray bands (during $\sim 3$
Myr), we estimate that each BHX event could inject $\sim 10^{52}$ erg in form of kinetic
energy in the ISM. With these hypotheses and in order to reproduce the observed cSFR,
our BHX model requires that a fraction of $\sim 20 \%$
of BHs with metallicity in the range $Z_{\rm EMP} = [0,10^{-4}]$ should end up as X-ray binary systems.
We tested combinations of larger and lower released kinetic
energy and BHX fractions finding that they produce too strong or too
weak effects, resulting in an inadequate regulation of the star formation
at high redshift.
\item Our model predicts BHX feedback to affect more strongly
galaxies with stellar masses in the range
$10^7$--$10^8\, M_\odot$
which inhabit haloes with virial velocities smaller than $V_{\rm vir} \sim 40\, {\rm km \,
s}^{-1}$. Larger
haloes would experience a negligible impact due to their larger
potential wells but
they could be indirectly affected by the accretion of smaller
haloes.
These results are shown to be robust against numerical resolution.
\item The energy injected
by BHXs helps to regulate the star formation activity in low-mass
haloes, decreasing the fraction of stars formed at very high redshift.
As a consequence, there is more gas available for star
formation at later times.
Therefore, when BHX feedback is included, the cSFR reproduces closely
observational results \citep{Behroozi2013}. In this
simulated volume, we found the BHX energy represents a $\sim 30\%$ of
total feedback energy released into the ISM at $z\sim7$,
and a $10\%$ at $z\sim 4$.
\item When BHX feedback is included the number of galaxies as a function of stellar masses shows
a larger evolution with redshift (for $z > 4$) compared to the run with only SN
feedback turned on. The variation of the evolution is driven by the
low-mass haloes which are more significantly affected by BHX
feedback, and hence, its characteristics could
be an observational test to probe the action of this feedback.
\item The stellar-to-virial mass relation for $z\sim 7$ is in better
agreement to that predicted from abundance matching \citep{Moster2013,Behroozi2013}. For
lower redshift, there is still an excess of stars,
although the slope of the relation is more comparable to the predicted trends.
\item Simulated galaxies with BHX+SN feedbacks exhibit hot ISM
at very high redshift but their mean temperature is smaller
than the virial temperature of the haloes. If the BHX feedback is
switched off, the resulting ISM are colder and the fraction of new born
stars higher in low mass haloes. As a consequence the number of SNe is enough to blow
part of the ISMs, contributing to building up hotter CGMs. In order
to prevent this, the SN feedback should be weaken but this would
lead to a further increase of the star formation, producing a larger
stellar fraction.
\end{itemize}
Hence, our results support previous claims that the BHXs could be an important source
of feedback in early stages of galaxy evolution by regulating the
star formation in haloes with $V_{\rm vir} \leq 40\, {\rm km \, s}^{-1}$. It goes in the same direction as the
so-called 'enhanced' feedback although BHX feedback would have
significant impact
only in the very early Universe.
\section*{Acknowledgements}
We would like to thank the referee, Dr Graham Wynn, for his careful
reading and comments which helped to improve the paper, and Laura Sales for
useful discussions.
Simulations are part of the Fenix Project and have been run in Hal Cluster of the Universidad Nacional
de C\'ordoba, AlphaCrucis of
IAG-USP (Brasil) and Barcelona Supercomputer Center. We acknowledged the use of Fenix Cluster of
Institute for Astronomy and Space Physics.
This work has been partially supported by PICT
Raices 2011/959 of Ministery of Science (Argentina) and Proyecto
Interno of Universidad Andres Bello (Chile).
\bibliographystyle{mn2e}
\defApJ{ApJ}
\defApJS{ApJS}
\defApJ{ApJ}
\defAJ{AJ}
\defMNRAS{MNRAS}
\defA\&A{A\&A}
\defNature{Nature}
\defARA\&A{ARA\&A}
\defA\&A{A\&A}
\defPASP{PASP}
\defNew Astronomy Reviews{New Astronomy Reviews}
|
\section{Introduction}\label{introduction}
The flow of two immiscible fluids through porous media arises in many important industrial and natural situations such as secondary oil recovery, ground water remediation, and geological ${\rm CO}_2$ storage. Such flows are known to be potentially unstable, especially when the displacing fluid is more viscous than the displaced one. There exist some similarities between porous media and Hele-Shaw flows (i.e. flow in a Hele-Shaw cell, see below); for example the pressure drop in both such flows are governed by Darcy's law for single fluid flow. Due to this and the fact that it is significantly easier to study Hele-Shaw flows theoretically, numerically, and experimentally, there have been numerous theoretical and numerical studies even for Hele-Shaw flow of two immiscible fluids since the early 1950s, starting with the work of Saffman and Taylor~\cite{Saffman/Taylor:1958}. There are many review articles on such studies, for example see \cite{Homsy:1987, Saffman:1986}. These studies were originally motivated by displacement processes arising in secondary oil recovery, even though these studies have much wider appeal in the sciences and engineering. In the late 1970s, tertiary displacement processes involved in chemical enhanced oil recovery generated interest in three-layer and multi-layer Hele-Shaw flows (see \cite{daripa08:multi-layer, daripa08:studies, dp05:growth, GH83:optimal}).
In this paper, we first briefly derive the non-standard eigenvalue problem. This eigenvalue problem has been derived earlier by the first author and his collaborators; for example see~\cite{daripa08:multi-layer}. But the difference is that the derivation presented here is more general and shows how to generate higher order correction terms if necessary in order to study the effect of nonlinear terms that may dominate the dynamics, particularly in view of the sensitivity of fingering problems to finite amplitude perturbations. However, we do not study or discuss such nonlinear effects in this paper which will be taken up in the future as it falls outside the scope of this paper. We then analytically study this non-standard eigenvalue problem using non-linear transformation for the case when the viscous profile of the middle layer is linear. We will see below that this case is relatively hard to study in comparison to the case when the viscous profile is exponential which we have recently addressed in \cite{gin-daripa:hs-rect}.
\begin{figure}[ht]
\centering
\includegraphics[scale=.8]{HS_Rect_LinearProfile.eps}
\caption{Three-layer rectilinear Hele-Shaw flow in which the middle layer has a smooth viscous profile. The physical set-up as well as the smooth viscous profile of the middle layer are shown in this figure.}
\label{fig:HS_Rect_LinearProfile}
\end{figure}
The physical set-up consists of rectilinear motion of three immiscible fluids in a Hele-Shaw cell which is a device separating two parallel plates by a distance $b$ (see Fig.~\ref{fig:HS_Rect_LinearProfile}). The fluid in the extreme left layer $R_1$ with viscosity $\mu_1$ extends up to $x=-\infty$, the fluid in the extreme right layer $R_2$ with viscosity $\mu_2 > \mu_1$ extends up to $x=\infty$, and the fluid in the middle-layer $R_I$ of finite length $L$ has a smooth viscous profile with viscosity increasing in the direction of displacement. The interfacial tensions of the leading and the trailing interfaces are given by $T$ and $S$ respectively. It is well established that this Hele-Shaw flow is similar to flow in homogeneous porous media with equivalent permeability $b^2/12$. Without any loss of generality, we take this to be one below. The mathematical model considered here consists of conservation of mass, Darcy's law and advection equation for viscosity. Thus we have
\begin{align}\label{eq1}
&{\bf \nabla}\cdot{\bf u}=0,\quad \forall\ (x,y)\in {\bb R}^2\\
\label{eq2}
&{\bf \nabla}{p}=-\mu{\bf u}\ \quad \forall\ (x,y)\in {\bb R}^2, \text{ but } \mu(x,y,t) = \left\{\begin{array}{l} \mu_1; \text{ if } (x,y)\in R_1\\ \mu(x,y,t); \text{ if } (x,y)\in R_I\\ \mu_2; \text{ if } (x,y)\in R_2\end{array}\right.\\
\label{eq3}
&\mu_t + u \mu_x + v\mu_y = 0;\quad \forall\ x\in R_I\ \text{and}\ y\in {\bb R}.
\end{align}
Due to the continuity equation, we can define the stream function $\psi = \psi(x,y,t)$ such that $u=\psi_y$ and $v=-\psi_x$. This then implies that
\begin{equation}
p_x = -\mu\psi_y,\quad p_y = \mu\psi_x,\quad {\rm and}\quad \mu_t + \psi_y \mu_x - \psi_x\mu_y = 0.
\end{equation}
Since ${\bf u} = (U_0,0)$ when $x^2+y^2\to \infty$, we consider a small perturbation of the basic scalar fields $\psi_0,p_0$ and $\mu_0$ of the form
\begin{equation*}
\left.
\begin{array}{l l}
\psi &= \psi(x,y,t) = U_0y + \varepsilon\widehat\psi(x,y,t)\\
p &= p(x,y,t) = p_0(x,t) + \varepsilon\widehat p(x,y,t)\\
\mu &=\mu(x,y,t) = \mu_0(x,t) + \varepsilon\widehat\mu(x,y,t)
\end{array}
\right\}
\end{equation*}
Substituting into the original equations, we get the following $O(\varepsilon^0)$ and $O(\varepsilon^1)$ equations.\newline
\noindent $O(\varepsilon^0)$ equations:
\begin{equation*}
\left.
\begin{array}{l l}
&p_{0x} = -U_0\mu_0\\
&p_{0y} = 0\\
&\mu_{0t} + U_0\mu_{0x}= 0
\end{array}
\right\}
\end{equation*}
These equations provide the basic solution given by
\begin{equation*}
\left.
\begin{array}{l}
\mu_0 = \mu_0(x,t) = \mu_0(x-U_0t)\\
p_0 = p_0(x,t) = -U_0 {\displaystyle\int^x_{x_0}} \mu_0(s-U_0t)ds\\
{\bf u} = (U_0,0)
\end{array}
\right\}
\end{equation*}
where $\mu_0(x-U_0t)$ is an arbitrary function of $\xi = x-U_0t$, meaning the viscous profile is fixed with respect to a moving frame moving at a constant velocity $(U_0,0)$.\medskip
\newline
\noindent $O(\varepsilon^1)$ equations:
\begin{equation*}
\left.
\begin{array}{l l}
&\widehat p_x = -U_0\widehat\mu - \mu_0\widehat\psi_y\\
&\widehat p_y = \mu_0\widehat\psi_x\\
&\widehat\mu_t + U_0\widehat\mu_x + \mu_{0x}\widehat\psi_y = 0.
\end{array}
\right\}
\end{equation*}
Now, introducing the moving frame change of variables, namely $\xi = x - U_0t,\ y = y,\ t = t$, we get the following system of equations.
\begin{equation}\label{eqn:Eqq1}
\left.
\begin{array}{l l}
&\widehat p_\xi = - U_0\widehat\mu - \mu_0\widehat\psi_y\\
&\widehat p_y = \mu_0\widehat\psi_\xi\\
&\widehat\mu_t + \mu_{0\xi}\widehat\psi_y = 0.
\end{array}
\right\}
\end{equation}
Taking cross derivatives of the first two equations with respect to $y$ and $\xi$ respectively and then subtracting the resulting equations from each other gives
$\mu_{0\xi}\widehat\psi_\xi + U_0\widehat\mu_y + \mu_0\Delta\widehat\psi=0.$ This combined with the equation $\eqref{eqn:Eqq1}_3$ leads to
\begin{equation*}
\mu_{0\xi}\widehat\psi_{\xi t} - U_0\mu_{0\xi} \widehat\psi_{yy} + \mu_0(\Delta\widehat\psi)_t = 0.
\end{equation*}
Using the ansatz $\widehat\psi=f(\xi) e^{iky+\sigma t}$ in the above equation together with the appropriate boundary conditions (see \cite{daripa08:multi-layer}) give the following eigenvalue problem.
\begin{align*}
&\mu_0(\xi)\{f_{\xi\xi} - k^2f\} + \mu_{0\xi}(\xi) f_\xi + \frac{k^2U_0}\sigma \mu_{0\xi}(\xi) f=0\\
&\mu^+_0(-L)f_\xi(-L) = f(-L)\left\{\mu_1k + \frac{U_0k^2}\sigma [\mu_1-\mu^+_0(-L)] + \frac{Sk^4}\sigma\right\}\\
&\mu^-_0(0)f_\xi(0) = f(0) \left\{-\mu_2k + \frac{U_0k^2}\sigma [\mu_2-\mu^-_0(0)] - \frac{Tk^4}\sigma\right\}
\end{align*}
where the viscous profile of the middle layer, namely, $\mu_0=\mu_0(\xi)$ is an arbitrary function. This is a non-standard eigenvalue problem in that the spectral parameter $1/\sigma$ appe
ars in the equation as well as in the boundary conditions. Recently, this problem has been numerically solved by Daripa~\cite{daripa08:studies} for a constant viscous profile and by Daripa \& Ding~\cite{daripa:tipm2012} for non-constant viscous profiles $\mu_0(\xi)$ to determine the most optimal profile, i.e., the least unstable profile. This problem has been too difficult to solve analytically for non-constant profiles. Progress made in this direction for the linear viscous profile is presented below.
In this paper we consider a linear viscous profile for the intermediate fluid region given by
$$ \mu_{0}(\xi)=\alpha \xi +\beta\qquad \textrm{for}\ -L<\xi<0 $$
where
$$ \alpha=\frac{ (\mu_{2}-\mu_{1})-(J_{1}+J_{2}) }{L}=\frac{\mu_0(0)-\mu_0(-L)}{L},\qquad \beta=\mu_{2}-J_{2}=\mu_0(0), $$
and $J_{1}=\mu_{0}(-L)-\mu_{1}, J_{2}=\mu_{2}-\mu_{0}(0)$ are jump discontinuity values at the interfaces $\xi=-L$ and $\xi=0$, respectively. In the left region the problem reduces to
$f_{\xi\xi} - k^2f = 0, \lim_{\xi\to-\infty} f(\xi) = 0,$ which has solution $f(\xi) = f(-L)e^{k(\xi+L)} \text{ for } \xi<-L$.
In the right region the problem reduces to
$f_{\xi\xi} -k^2f = 0, \lim_{\xi\to\infty} f(\xi)=0,$ which has solution $f(\xi) = f(0)e^{-k\xi} \text{ for } \xi>0.$
In the intermediate region the problem reduces to
\begin{equation}\label{eq:main-evp}
\left\lbrace
\begin{array}{rcl}
\displaystyle{(\alpha\xi +\beta)f_{\xi\xi}+\alpha f_{\xi}+k^{2}(\alpha \lambda -(\alpha\xi+\beta))f}&=&0,\quad -L<\xi<0\\
\displaystyle{ \mu_{0}(-L)f_{\xi}(-L)} &=& (\alpha_{1}(k)\lambda+\alpha_{2}(k))f(-L) \\
\displaystyle{ \mu_{0}(0)f_{\xi}(0) } &=& (\beta_{1}(k)\lambda-\beta_{2}(k))f(0)
\end{array}
\right.
\end{equation}
where $\lambda=\frac{U_{0}}{\sigma}$ is the spectral parameter and
\begin{equation}\label{coef}
\left\lbrace
\begin{array}{cc}
\alpha_{1}(k)=\frac{Sk^{4}}{U_{0}} +k^{2}(\mu_{1}-\mu_{0}(-L)), & \alpha_{2}(k)=\mu_{1}k\\
\beta_{1}(k) = -\frac{T k^{4}}{U_{0}}+ k^2(\mu_{2}-\mu_{0}(0)), & \beta_{2}(k)=\mu_{2}k
\end{array}
\right.
\end{equation}
\section{Solution to the Eigenvalue Problem~\eqref{eq:main-evp} via Kummer's Equation}
We introduce the nonlinear transformation and change of variables given by
\begin{equation}\label{eq:change-of-variables}
f(\xi) = e^{k\xi}z(w),\quad w=-2k\left(\xi+\frac{\beta}{\alpha}\right) < 0.
\end{equation}
After some manipulation of the eigenvalue problem \eqref{eq:main-evp} using the above transformation, we obtain the following eigenvalue problem for the Kummer's equation~$\eqref{eq:bc-z-Kummer}_1$.
\begin{equation}\label{eq:bc-z-Kummer}
\left.
\begin{array}{ll}
&wz_{ww} + (b-w)z_w - az = 0,\quad w_{2}<w<w_{1}\\
&\eta_1z(w_1) + \phi_1z^{\prime}(w_1) = 0,\\
&\eta_2z(w_2) + \phi_2z^{\prime}(w_2) = 0,
\end{array}
\right\}
\end{equation}
where a prime denotes derivative,
\begin{equation}\label{eq:w1-w2-def}
\left.
\begin{split}
b=1,\quad a=\frac{1}{2}(1+k\lambda),\quad w_{2}\equiv w(\xi=0)=-2k\ \frac{\mu_{0}(0)}{\alpha},\quad w_{1} \equiv w(\xi=-L)=w_{2}+2kL<0,\\
\eta_1 = {Sk^4}/\sigma,\quad \phi_1=2k\mu_1,\quad \eta_2 = 2\mu_2k+{Tk^4}/\sigma,\quad {\rm and}\quad \phi_2=-2k\mu_2.
\end{split}
\right\}
\end{equation}
The eigenvalue problem \eqref{eq:bc-z-Kummer} is a regular two point boundary value problem for each wave number $k$. One solution $z_1$ of the Kummer's equation is given by
\begin{equation*}
z_1(a,1,w) = a_0+\frac{a_1w}{(1!)^2} + \frac{a_2w^2}{(2!)^2} + \frac{a_3w^3}{(3!)^2} +\cdot + \frac{a_nw^n}{(n!)^2} +\cdots.
\end{equation*}
\newline where $a_0=1$ and $a_n = a(a+1)(a+2)\cdots (a+n-1)\ \ {\rm for}\ n=1,2,\ldots$.\newline This is an analytic solution. It is easily seen that the derivative of this solution which we will need below for the dispersion relation is given by
{\small
\begin{equation*}
z'_1(a,1,w) = \frac{a_1}{(1!)^2} + \frac{2a_2w}{(2!)^2} + \frac{3a_3w^2}{(3!)^2} +\cdots+ \frac{na_nw^{n-1}}{(n!)^2} + \frac{(n+1)a_{n+1}w^n}{(n+1)!^2} +\cdots = az_1(a+1,2,w).
\end{equation*}
}
The linearly independent second solution is easily constructed by the method of Frobenius. Avoiding all the details, the second solution $z_2$ is given by
{\small
\begin{equation*}
z_2(a,1,w) = w^{1/2} \left\{1 + \frac{a_{1/2}w}{1\cdot 3\cdot 1!} + \frac{a_{3/2}w^2}{1\cdot 3\cdot 5\cdot 2!} + \frac{a_{5/2}w^3}{1\cdot 3\cdot 5\cdot 7\cdot 3!} +\cdots+\frac{a_{\frac{2n-1}2}w^n}{1 \cdot 3\cdot 5\cdot 7\cdots(2n+1)\cdot n!} +\cdots\right\}
\end{equation*}
}
where $a_{{}_{\frac{2n-1}2}}=(a+\frac{2n-1}2)(a+\frac{2n-3}2) \cdots (a+\frac52)(a+\frac32)(a+\frac12),\quad n=1,2,3,\ldots$~. Its derivative which we will need below is then given by
{\small
\begin{equation*}
z'_2(a,1,w) = \frac{1}{2w}z_2(a,1,w) + w^{1/2}
\left\{\frac{2a_{1/2}}{3!} + \frac{2\cdot 2^2a_{3/2}w}{5!}+ \frac{3\cdot 2^3 a_{\frac52}w^2}{7!} +\cdots+
\frac{n2^n a_{{}_{\frac{2n-1}2}} w^{n-1}}{(2n+1)!}+\cdots\right\}
\end{equation*}
}
The general solution of the Kummer's equation is then given by
\begin{equation*}
z(w) = c_1z_1(a,1,w) + c_2z_2(a,1,w),
\end{equation*}
where $c_1$ and $c_2$ are arbitrary constants. Substituting the general solution into the two boundary conditions of the eigenvalue problem \eqref{eq:bc-z-Kummer}, we obtain the following linear system of equations for $c_1$ and $c_2$.
\begin{align*}
&\{\eta_1z_1(w_1) + \phi_1z'_1(w_1)\} c_1 + \{\eta_1z_2(w_1) + \phi_1z'_2(w_1)\} c_2 = 0,\\
&\{\eta_2z_1(w_2) + \phi_2z'_1(w_2)\} c_1 + \{\eta_2z_2(w_2) + \phi_2z'_2(w_2)\} c_2 = 0.
\end{align*}
Therefore, for a non-trivial solution we have
\begin{equation}\label{eqn:existence}
\begin{vmatrix}
\eta_1z_1(w_1) + \phi_1z'_1(w_1)&\eta_1z_2(w_1) + \phi_1z'_2(w_1)\\
\eta_2z_1(w_2) + \phi_2z'_1(w_2)&\eta_2z_2(w_2) + \phi_2z'_2(w_2).
\end{vmatrix}
=0.
\end{equation}
This formally gives the dispersion relation $\sigma(k)$ in terms of the problem data: $S, T, \mu_1, \mu_2, L$ and $U_0$.
In terms of the original variables $f$ and $\xi$, the fundamental solutions $f_1(\xi)$ and $f_2(\xi)$ are then given by (see \eqref{eq:change-of-variables})
\begin{align}
f_1(\xi) &= e^{k\xi}\left\{1-\frac{a_12k(\xi+\frac{\mu_2}\alpha)}{(1!)^2} +
\frac{a_2(2k)^2(\xi + \frac{\mu_2}\alpha)^2}{(2!)^2}-
\frac{a_3(2k)^3(\xi +\frac{\mu_2}\alpha)^3}{(3!)^2} +\right.\nonumber\\
&\quad \left. \cdots+ (-1)^n \frac{a_n(2k)^n(\xi +\frac{\mu_2}\alpha)^n}{(n!)^2} +\cdots\right\}\label{eqn:f1}\\
f_2(\xi) &= e^{k\xi}\left\{-2k\left(\xi + \frac{\mu_2}\alpha\right)\right\}^{1/2}
\left\{1-\frac{a_{1/2}2k(\xi + \frac{\mu_2}\alpha)}{1\cdot 3\cdot(1!)} +
\frac{a_{3/2}(2k)^2 (\xi+\frac{\mu_2}\alpha)^2}{1\cdot 3\cdot 5\cdot (2!)}\right.\nonumber\\
&\quad \left. - \frac{a_{5/2}(2k)^3(\xi+\frac{\mu_2}\alpha)^3}{1\cdot 3\cdot 5\cdot 7\cdot (3!)}
+\cdots+ (-1)^n \frac{a_{{}_{\frac{2n-1}2}}(2k)^n (\xi+\frac{\mu_2}\alpha)^2}
{1\cdot 3\cdot 5\cdot 7\cdots(2n+1)(n!)} +\cdots\right\}\label{eqn:f2}
\end{align}
where
\[
\left.
\begin{array}{l}
a_0=1\\
a_n = a(a+1)(a+2)\cdots (a+n-1)\\
a_{\frac{2n-1}2} = (a+1/2)(a+3/2)(a+5/2)\cdots \left(a+\frac{2n-3}2\right) \left(a + \frac{2n-1}2\right),\quad 1,2,3,4,5,\ldots\\
a_{-\frac12} = 1
\end{array}
\right\}
\]
Also, recall that $\xi = x-U_0t$, $\alpha = (\mu_2-\mu_1)/L$ and $a = (1+kU_0/\sigma)/2$. Noticing that both series are centered at $\xi = -(\mu_2/\alpha)$ and applying the ratio test for series for $f_1(\xi)$ above, we have
\begin{equation*}
\left|\frac{\dfrac{a_{n+1}\cancel{(2k)^{n+1}} \cancel{(\xi+\frac{\mu_2}\alpha)^{n+1}}}{((n+1)!)^2}}{\dfrac{a_n \cancel{(2k)^n} \cancel{(\xi+\frac{\mu_2}\alpha)^n}}{(n!)^2}}\right| = \left|\frac{(a+n)(2k)(\xi +\frac{\mu_2}\alpha)}{(n+1)^2}\right|
= \left|\frac{(a+n)(2k)}{(n+1)^2}\right| \left|\xi+\frac{\mu_2}\alpha\right| ~
\rightarrow ~ 0\ \ \text{as}\ n\rightarrow \infty,
\end{equation*}
for any $\xi$ fixed. Thus the series for $f_1(\xi)$ converges absolutely $\forall\ \xi \ne -(\mu_2/\alpha)$, but the series \emph{evaluated} at $\xi = -(\mu_2/\alpha)$ reduces to 1. This implies that the radius of this series is $\infty$. Hence
\[
\lim_{n\to\infty} \frac{(-1)^n a_n(2k)^n(\xi+\frac{\mu_2}\alpha)^n}{(n!)^2} = 0,
\]
and since it is an alternating singular series, the error $E_n^{(1)}$ in approximating $f_1$ by terms up to $k^n$ is smaller than the last neglected term, namely
\[
|E_n^{(1)}| \leqq \left|\frac{a_{n+1}(2k)^{n+1}(\xi+\frac{\mu_2}\alpha)^{n+1}}{((n+1)!)^2}\right|
\]
for a fixed $\xi$. Similarly, applying the ratio test to the series for $f_2(\xi)$,
\begin{equation*}
\left|\frac{\dfrac{\cancel{2^{n+1}} \cancel{a_{{}_{\frac{2n+1}2}}} \cancel{(2k)^{n+1}} (\xi + \frac{\mu_2}\alpha)^{n+1}}{(2n+3)!}}{\dfrac{\cancel{2^n} \cancel{a_{{}_{\frac{2n-1}2}}} \cancel{(2k)^n} (\xi + \frac{\mu_2}\alpha)^n}{(2n+1)!}}\right| = \left|\frac{2(a+ \frac{2n+1}2) (2k) (\xi + \frac{\mu_2}\alpha)}{(2n+2)(2n+3)}\right| \to 0,\ \text{as}\ n \rightarrow \infty,
\end{equation*}
for any $\xi$ \text{fixed}. Thus the series inside the brackets converges absolutely $\forall \xi\ne -(\mu_2/\alpha)$, but the series inside the brackets evaluated at $\xi = -\frac{\mu_2}\
alpha$ reduces to 1. Therefore, the radius of convergence of the series within the brackets is $\infty$. Hence
\begin{equation*}
\lim\limits_{n\to\infty}\frac{(-1)^n 2^n a_{{}_{\frac{2n-1}2}}(2k)^n (\xi+\frac{\mu_2}\alpha)^n}{(2n+1)!} = 0.
\end{equation*}
Notice that $f_2(\xi)$ has a branch point at $\xi=-\frac{\mu_2}\alpha$. In any case, since the series within the brackets is an alternating sign series, if we truncate it, the error $E_n^{
(2)}$ is smaller than the last neglected term, i.e.,
\[
|E_n^{(2)}| \leqq \left|\frac{2^{n+1}a_{{}_{\frac{2n+1}2}}(2k)^{n+1} (\xi+ \frac{\mu_2}\alpha)^{n+1}}{(2n+3)!}\right|.
\]
The general solution of the ODE $\eqref{eq:main-evp}_1$ is then given by $f(\xi)=c_1f_1(\xi)+c_2f_2(\xi)$. The boundary values of $f(\xi)$ follow from \eqref{eqn:f1} and \eqref{eqn:f2} whi
ch are now given by
\begin{align*}
f_1(-L) &= e^{-kL} \sum^\infty_{n=0} \frac{(-1)^n (2kL)^n a_n (\frac{\mu_1}{\mu_2-\mu_1})^n}{(n!)^2}\\
f_1(0) &= \sum^\infty_{n=0} \frac{(-1)^n (2kL)^n a_n (\frac{\mu_2}{\mu_2-\mu_1})^n}{(n!)^2}\\
f_2(-L) &= e^{-kL} \left\{-2kL \left(\frac{\mu_1}{\mu_2-\mu_1}\right)\right\}^{1/2} \sum^\infty_{n=0} \frac{(-1)^n (2^2kL)^n a_{{}_{\frac{2n-1}2}}(\frac{\mu_1}{\mu_2-\mu_1})^n}{(2n +1)!}\\
f_2(0) &= \left\{-2kL \left(\frac{\mu_2}{\mu_2-\mu_1}\right)\right\}^{1/2} \sum^\infty_{n=0} \frac{(-1)^n (2^2kL)^n a_{{}_{\frac{2n-1}2}}(\frac{\mu_2}{\mu_2-\mu_1})^n}{(2n+1)!}
\end{align*}
Substituting these in the boundary conditions $\eqref{eq:main-evp}_3$, we obtain the following system of equations for the constants $c_1$ and $c_2$.
\begin{align*}
\{A_1f_1(-L) - \mu_1f'_1(-L)\}c_1 + \{A_1f_2(-L) - \mu_1f'_2(-L)\} c_2 &= 0,\\
\{A_2f_1(0) - \mu_2f'_1(0)\}c_1 + \{A_2f_2(0) - \mu_2f'_2(0)\} c_2 &= 0,
\end{align*}
where $A_1 = \{\mu_1k + \frac{Sk^4}\sigma\}$ and $A_2 = \{-\mu_2k+ \frac{Tk^4}\sigma\}$. For the existence of nontrivial solutions, we then have
\[
\begin{vmatrix}
A_1f_1(-L)-\mu_1f'_1(-L)&A_1f_2(-L)-\mu_1f'_2(-L)\\
A_2f_1(0)-\mu_2f'_1(0)&A_2f_2(0)-\mu_2f'_2(0)
\end{vmatrix} = 0,
\]
which gives us the dispersion relation in the form: $\theta(\sigma,k)=0$. Because of the nature of the series solutions given above, it is not possible to give this dispersion relation explicitly.
\section{Limiting Cases}\label{section:limiting-cases}
There are an infinite number of eigenvalues $\sigma$ (recall $\lambda=U/\sigma$) which can be ordered: $\sigma_{\max}=\sigma_1 > \sigma_2 > .....> \sigma_\infty \rightarrow 0$. We know that these infinite number of eigenvalues should reduce to (i) only two in the limit $\alpha \to 0$ corresponding to the constant viscosity of the intermediate layer fluid~(see Daripa~\cite{daripa08:studies}); (ii) only one in the limit $L \to 0$ (see Saffman \& Taylor~\cite{Saffman/Taylor:1958}, Daripa~\cite{daripa08:multi-layer}) and (iii) only two in the limit of $L \to \infty$ (see Daripa~\cite{daripa:tipm2012}). In fact, we also know the eigenvalues in these limiting cases from the pure Saffman-Taylor growth rate of individual interfaces. These results by no means are transparent from the solutions of the eigenvalue problem~\eqref{eq:main-evp} given in the previous section. Below, we show how to recover these limit solutions (eigenvalues) from the infinite number of eigenvalues for the linear viscous profile.
\subsection{Constant viscosity case: $\alpha=0$.}\label{subsection:constant-viscosity}
In this case, the eigenvalue problem~\eqref{eq:main-evp} reduces to
\begin{equation}\label{SLP3}
\left\lbrace
\begin{array}{rcl}
f_{\xi\xi}-k^{2}f &=&0,\quad -L<\xi<0,\\
\mu_{0}(-L)f_{\xi}(-L) &=& (\alpha_{1}(k)\lambda+\alpha_{2}(k))f(-L), \\
\mu_{0}(0)f_{\xi}(0) &=& (\beta_{1}(k)\lambda-\beta_{2}(k))f(0),
\end{array}
\right.
\end{equation}
In this case, the change of variable introduced previously, namely $w=-2k\left(\xi+\frac{\beta}{\alpha}\right)$, which converts the equation~$\eqref{eq:main-evp}_1$ to Kummer's equation, i
s not well-defined. Therefore we work with the boundary value problem~$\eqref{SLP3}$. Now, consider the general solution of the ODE in (\ref{SLP3})
$$f(\xi)=Af_{1}(\xi)+Bf_{2}(\xi),$$
such that
\begin{equation}\label{cond1}
\left\lbrace\begin{array}{cc}
f_{1}(-L)=1, & f_{1}'(-L)=0,\\
f_{2}(-L)=0, & f_{2}'(-L)=1.
\end{array}
\right.
\end{equation}
Therefore, we get
\begin{equation*}
f_{1}(\xi)=\cosh(k(\xi+L)),\quad\textrm{and}\quad f_{2}(\xi)=\frac{\sinh(k(\xi+L))}{k}.
\end{equation*}
We search for a solution of the boundary value problem (\ref{SLP3}) of the form
\begin{equation}\label{eq:limf}
f(\xi;\lambda)=A\cosh(k(\xi+L)) + B \frac{\sinh(k(\xi+L))}{k}.
\end{equation}
To find a solution of (\ref{SLP3}) of this form, we start determining the coefficients using the shooting technique such that the boundary condition at $\xi=-L$ is satisfied. Obviously, the coefficients $A$ and $B$ depend on the parameter $\lambda$. Then, we find $\lambda$ in such a way that the solution satisfies the boundary condition at $\xi=0$. Hence, we look for $A$ and $B$ such that
\begin{equation*}
f(-L;\lambda)=\mu_{0}(-L),\quad \textrm{and}\quad f_{\xi}(-L;\lambda)=\alpha_{1}(k)\lambda + \alpha_{2}(k).
\end{equation*}
Then it follows directly from (\ref{cond1}) that $A= \mu_{0}(-L)$ and $B=\alpha_{1}(k)\lambda + \alpha_{2}(k).$ Therefore
\begin{equation}\label{solmodelosimple}
f(\xi;\lambda)=\mu_{0}(-L)\cosh(k(\xi+L))+(\alpha_{1}(k)\lambda + \alpha_{2}(k)) \frac{\sinh(k(\xi+L))}{k}
\end{equation}
satisfies the ODE in \eqref{SLP3} and the boundary condition at $\xi=-L$. From these it follows that the spectrum of problem (\ref{SLP3}) can be studied using the following algebraic equation (see $\eqref{SLP3}_3$)
\begin{equation}\label{al1}
\mu_{0}(0)\frac{f_{\xi}(0;\lambda)}{f(0;\lambda)}=\beta_{1}(k)\lambda -\beta_{2}(k),
\end{equation}
where $f(\xi;\lambda)$ is the function defined in \eqref{solmodelosimple}. Evaluating $f(0;\lambda)$ and $f_{\xi}(0;\lambda)$ from \eqref{solmodelosimple} and substituting directly in \eqref{al1} one obtains
\begin{equation}\label{explicitall}
k\mu_{0}(0)\left\lbrace \frac{\mu_{0}(-L)\sinh(kL) + (\alpha_{1}(k)\lambda + \alpha_{2}(k)) \displaystyle{\frac{\cosh(k L )}{k}}}{\mu_{0}(-L)\cosh(kL) + (\alpha_{1}(k)\lambda + \alpha_{2}(k)) \displaystyle{\frac{\sinh(kL)}{k}}}\right\rbrace=\beta_{1}(k)\lambda -\beta_{2}(k).
\end{equation}
Then, taking $L\to 0^{+}$ one obtains
\begin{equation*}
k\mu_{0}(0)\left( \frac{\alpha_{1}(k)\lambda+\alpha_{2}(k)}{k\mu_{0}(-L)} \right) = \beta_{1}(k)\lambda -\beta_{2}(k),
\end{equation*}
which is equivalent to the equation
\begin{equation*}
\left(\mu_{0}(0)\alpha_{1}(k)- \mu_{0}(-L)\beta_{1}(k)\right)\,\lambda = -\left(\mu_{0}(0)\alpha_{2}(k)+ \mu_{0}(-L)\beta_{2}(k)\right).
\end{equation*}
Since $\mu_{0}(\xi)={\rm constant}$ ($\mu$ or $\beta$), it follows that
\begin{equation*}
(\alpha_{1}(k)- \beta_{1}(k)) \lambda =- (\alpha_{2}(k)+ \beta_{2}(k)).
\end{equation*}
Now, using the definition of the coefficient $\alpha_{1}(k),\ \alpha_{2}(k),\ \beta_{1}(k),\ \beta_{2}(k)$ given in (\ref{coef}) we have
\begin{equation*}
\left[\left(\frac{Sk^{4}}{U_{0}} +\frac{Tk^{4}}{U_{0}}\right)+k^{2}(\mu_{1}-\mu_{2})\right] \lambda=-k(\mu_{1}+\mu_{2})
\end{equation*}
from which it follows that
\begin{equation*}
\sigma=\frac{U_{0}k(\mu_{2}-\mu_{1})-k^3(S+T)}{(\mu_{1}+\mu_{2} )}
\end{equation*}
which is the formula for the growth rate of an interface with surface tension $(S+T)$, which is what should be expected in this limit. Thus we recover the classical formula for the growth rate in this limit.
To take the limit when $L\to\infty$, we go back to equation (\ref{explicitall}) and write it as follows
\begin{equation*}
k\mu_{0}(0) \left\lbrace \frac{\mu_{0}(-L)\tanh(k L) + (\alpha_{1}(k)\lambda + \alpha_{2}(k)) \displaystyle{\frac{1}{k}}}{\mu_{0}(-L) + (\alpha_{1}(k)\lambda + \alpha_{2}(k)) \displaystyle{\frac{\tanh(k L)}{k}}} \right\rbrace=\beta_{1}(k)\lambda -\beta_{2}(k).
\end{equation*}
Now, taking the limit when $L\to \infty$, we obtain $k\mu_{0}(0) = \beta_{1}(k)\lambda -\beta_{2}(k).$ Using $\sigma=U_{0}/\lambda$ and expressions for the coefficients from $\eqref{coef}_2$, we obtain
\begin{equation*}
\sigma=U_{0}\left( \frac{-\frac{Tk^{4}}{U_{0}} +k^{2}(\mu_{2}-\mu_{0}(0))}{k(\mu_{2}-\mu_{0}(0))}\right).
\end{equation*}
Finally, since $\mu_{0}(0)={\rm constant}$ ($\mu$ or $\beta$) it follows that
\begin{equation*}
\sigma=-\frac{Tk^{3}}{\mu_{2}+\mu} +U_{0}k \left( \frac{\mu_{2}-\mu}{\mu+\mu_{2}} \right)
\end{equation*}
which gives the classical formula for Saffman-Taylor instability of the leading interface. Similarly, we can recover the the classical formula for Saffman-Taylor instability of the trailin
g interface by reversing the shooting technique (see after \eqref{eq:limf}), i.e., first find the solution which is analogous to \eqref{solmodelosimple} but satisfies the boundary condition
at $\xi=0$ instead and then shoot to satisfy the boundary condition at $\xi=-L$ (i.e., replace \eqref{al1} by a similar formula derived from the boundary condition at $\xi=-L$ and follow the
procedure).
\subsection{Linear viscosity case: $\alpha > 0$.}\label{subsection:linear-viscosity}
In this section, we study asymptotic limits ($L\to0$ and $L\to\infty$) of the solutions to the eigenvalue problem~\eqref{eq:main-evp}. To this end, we consider the following form of two linearly independent solutions of Kummer's equation $(\ref{eq:bc-z-Kummer})_1$.
These are convenient for the asymptotic analysis presented below.
\begin{equation}\label{specialfunctions}
\left.
\begin{array}{rcl}
M(a,1,w) &=&\displaystyle{1+\sum_{i=1}^{\infty}\frac{(a)_{i}}{(1)!}\frac{w^{i}}{i!}}\\
e^{w}U(1-a,1,-w) &=&\displaystyle{ -\frac{e^{w}}{\Gamma(1-a)} M(1-a,1,-w)\ln(-w)+ } \\
& & \displaystyle{ -\frac{e^{w}}{\Gamma(1-a)} \sum_{i=1}^{\infty} \frac{(1-a)_{i}}{(i!)^{2}}\left( \Psi((1-a)+i)-2\Psi(1+i) \right)(-w)^{i} }
\end{array}
\right\}
\end{equation}
where $\Psi(s)$ is Euler's digamma function (See Abramowitz~\cite{Abramowitz:1964}, Chapter 13).
To this end, we follow the steps presented in the previous section~\ref{subsection:constant-viscosity} for the particular case $\mu_{0}(\xi)={\rm constant}$ ($\mu$ or $\beta$). From the transformation in \eqref{eq:change-of-variables}, it follows that
\begin{equation}\label{eq:fxi}
f(\xi;\lambda)=(Az_{1}(w)+Bz_{2}(w))e^{k\xi}
\end{equation}
is the general solution of the ODE $\eqref{eq:main-evp}_1$ where
\begin{equation}\label{eq:two-lin}
\left.
\begin{array}{rcl}
z_{1}(w)&=& C_{1}M(a,1,w)+D_{1}e^{w}U(1-a,1,-w)\\
z_{2}(w)&=& C_{2}M(a,1,w)+D_{2}e^{w}U(1-a,1,-w)
\end{array}
\right\}
\end{equation}
and $C_{1},\ D_{1},\ C_{2},\ D_{2} $ are chosen such that
\begin{equation}\label{eq:cond2}
\left.
\begin{array}{cc}
z_{1}(w_{1})=1, & z_{1}'(w_{1})=0\\
z_{2}(w_{1})=0, & z_{2}'(w_{1})=1
\end{array}
\right\}
\end{equation}
where
$a=(1+k\lambda)/2$.
Substituting \eqref{eq:two-lin} in the boundary conditions~\eqref{eq:cond2}, we obtain the following linear systems of equations
\begin{equation}\label{eq:system1}
\begin{pmatrix}
M(a,1,w_{1})&e^{w_{1}} U(1-a,1,-w_{1})\\M'(a,1,w_{1})& (e^{w} U(1-a,1,-w)'_{w_{1}}
\end{pmatrix}
\begin{pmatrix}
C_{1}\\D_{1}
\end{pmatrix}
=\begin{pmatrix}
1\\0
\end{pmatrix}
\end{equation}
\begin{equation}\label{eq:system2}
\begin{pmatrix}
M(a,1,w_{1})&e^{w_{1}} U(1-a,1,-w_{1})\\M'(a,1,w_{1})& (e^{w} U(1-a,1,-w))'_{w_{1}}
\end{pmatrix}
\begin{pmatrix}
C_{2}\\D_{2}
\end{pmatrix}
=\begin{pmatrix}
0\\1
\end{pmatrix}
\end{equation}
Solving the above two systems and using the relations (see Abramowitz~\cite{Abramowitz:1964}, Chapter 13)
\begin{equation}
\label{relspecialfunction}
\left.
\begin{array}{rcl}
M'(a,1,w) &=& a M(a+1,1+1,w),\\
U'(1-a,1,-w) &=&- (1-a)U(1+(1-a),1+1,-w)(-1).
\end{array}
\right\}
\end{equation}
we obtain
\begin{equation}
\label{coef2}
\left.
\begin{array}{rcl}
C_{1}&=&\displaystyle{e^{w_{1}}\left(U\left(\frac{1-k\lambda}{2},1,-w_{1}\right)+ \frac{1-k\lambda}{2}U\left( \frac{3-k\lambda}{2},2,-w_{1}\right)\right)/ W\lbrace 1,2 \rbrace}\\
D_{1} &=&-\displaystyle{\frac{1+k\lambda}{2}M\left( \frac{3+k\lambda}{2},2,w_{1} \right)/ W\lbrace 1,2 \rbrace}\\
C_{2} &=&-\displaystyle{ e^{w_{1}} U\left( \frac{1-k\lambda}{2},1,-w_{1} \right)/ W\lbrace 1,2 \rbrace}\\
D_{2} &=&\displaystyle{ M\left( \frac{1+k\lambda}{2},1,w_{1} \right)/ W\lbrace 1,2 \rbrace}
\end{array}
\right\}
\end{equation}
where $W\lbrace 1,2 \rbrace$ is the determinant of the coefficient matrix of the system \eqref{eq:system1}.
Similar to the procedure of the previous section~\ref{subsection:constant-viscosity}, we find $A$ and $B$ so that $f(-L;\lambda)=\mu_{0}(-L)$ and $f'(-L;\lambda)=\alpha_{1}(k)\lambda +\alpha_{2}(k)$. Therefore, it follows from \eqref{eq:fxi} and \eqref{eq:cond2} that
\begin{equation*}
\begin{array}{rcl}
A e^{-kL} &=&\mu_{0}(-L),\\
Ake^{-kL}-2kB e^{-kL}&=&\alpha_{1}(k)\lambda +\alpha_{2}(k),
\end{array}
\end{equation*}
and therefore $A=\mu_{0}(-L)e^{kL}$ and $B=-\left(\frac{\alpha_{1}(k)\lambda+\alpha_{2}(k)-k\mu_{0}(-L)}{2k}\right)e^{kL}$. Substituting these constants in the function $f(\xi;\lambda)$ defined by \eqref{eq:fxi}, we obtain a solution of the ODE that satisfies the boundary condition at $\xi=-L$ of the eigenvalue problem \eqref{eq:main-evp}. Since $A$ and $B$ depend on the spectral parameter $\lambda$, it follows that the eigenvalues of the problem \eqref{eq:main-evp} can be obtained by studying the following algebraic equation which is a reformulation of the boundary condition at $\xi=0$ of the eigenvalue problem \eqref{eq:main-evp}.
\begin{equation}\label{al2}
\mu_{0}(0)\frac{f_\xi(0;\lambda)}{f(0;\lambda)}=\beta_{1}(k)\lambda -\beta_{2}(k).
\end{equation}
Since the right-hand side of the above equation does not depend on $L$, we need to study the asymptotic limits ($L\to 0$ and $L\to\infty$) of the lefthand side of (\ref{al2}). Notice that
the expression $\displaystyle{{f_{\xi}(0;\lambda)}/{f(0;\lambda)}}$ above is given by (see \eqref{eq:fxi})
\begin{equation}\label{eq:ratio1}
\frac{f_{\xi}(0;\lambda)}{f(0;\lambda)}= k\left(1-2\frac{Az'_{1}(w_{2})+Bz'_{2}(w_{2})}{Az_{1}(w_{2})+Bz_{2}(w_{2})}\right).
\end{equation}
Therefore, we first find the asymptotic approximations for $z_1(w_2), z_2(w_2), z_1'(w_2)$, and $z_2'(w_2)$ in both cases below before estimating the ratio ${f_{\xi}(0;\lambda)}/{f(0;\lambda)}$ using \eqref{eq:ratio1} for its use in \eqref{al2}. Below, we write $w_{1}=d_{1}L$ and $w_{2}=d_{2}L$ where $d_1$ and $d_2$ are given by (see \eqref{eq:w1-w2-def}),
\begin{equation}\label{factores}
d_{1}=-2k\mu_{0}(-L)/(\mu_{0}(0)-\mu_{0}(-L)),\quad \textrm{and}\quad d_{2}= -2k(\mu_{0}(0))/(\mu_{0}(0)-\mu_{0}(-L)).
\end{equation}
\vskip 0.1truein
\noindent\underline{\bf First case} (When $L\to\infty$):\ It follows from Abramowitz and Stegun~\cite{Abramowitz:1964} that
\begin{equation}\label{asymphypergeometric1}
\left.
\begin{array}{rcl}
M(a,1,d_{j}L)&=&\displaystyle{\frac{\Gamma(1)}{\Gamma(a)}(-d_{j}L)^{-a}(1+O(|L|^{-1}))},\quad
\textrm{as}\ L\to\infty,\ \ \textrm{for}\ \ j=1,2\\
U(1-a,1,-d_{j}L)&=&(-d_{j}L)^{-(1-a)}(1+O(|L|^{-1})),\quad \textrm{as}\ L\to\infty,\ \ \textrm{for}\ \ j=1,2.
\end{array}
\right\}
\end{equation}
Using the identities from (\ref{relspecialfunction}) we obtain
\begin{equation}
\label{asymphypergeometric2}
\left.
\begin{array}{rcl}
M'(a,1,d_{j}L)&=&\displaystyle{\frac{\Gamma(1+1)}{\Gamma(1+a)}(-d_{j}L)^{-(1+a)}(1+O(|L|^{-1}))},\quad
\textrm{as}\ L\to\infty,\ \ \textrm{for}\ \ j=1,2\\
U'(1-a,1,-d_{j}L)&=&(1-a)(-d_{j}L)^{-(1+(1-a))}(1+O(|L|^{-1})),\quad
\textrm{as}\ L\to\infty,\ \ \textrm{for}\ \ j=1,2.
\end{array}
\right\}
\end{equation}
Using \eqref{coef2}, \eqref{asymphypergeometric1} and the relation $\displaystyle{\lim_{L\to\infty}{e^{d_{2}L}}/{e^{d_{1}L}}=0}$ in the expression $\eqref{eq:two-lin}_1$ for $z_1(w_2)$, we obtain
$$z_{1}(w_{2})=O\left\lbrace e^{d_{1}L}(-d_{1}L)^{-(3-k\lambda)/2} (-d_{2}L)^{-(1+k\lambda)/2}\right\rbrace $$
which can be written as $z_{1}(w_{2}) \sim C_{1}M(a,1,w_{2}),$ where
$\displaystyle{C_{1}=O\lbrace e^{d_{1}L}(-d_{1}L)^{(-3+k\lambda)/2} \rbrace}$ (see \eqref{coef2}). Using similar arguments it follows that
\begin{equation}
\label{asymptotics}
\left. \begin{array}{rcl}
z_{1}(w_{2}) &\sim& C_{1}M(a,1,d_{2}L)\\
z_{2}(w_{2}) &\sim& C_{2}M(a,1,d_{2}L)\\
z'_{1}(w_{2}) &\sim& C_{1}M'(a,1,d_{2}L)=C_{1}aM(a+1,1+1,d_{2}L)\\
z'_{2}(w_{2}) &\sim& C_{2}M'(a,1,d_{2}L)=C_{2}aM(a+1,1+1,d_{2}L)
\end{array}\right\}
\end{equation}
for $L\to\infty$, see (\ref{coef2}) for the dependence of $\lambda,\ d_{1}$ and $L$ of the coefficient $C_{1},\ D_{1},\ C_{2}$ and $D_{2}$. Thus, using the above asymptotic results for the coefficient $C_{1},\ D_{1},\ C_{2}$ and $D_{2}$ and the asymptotic results for the confluent hypergeometric functions given in (\ref{asymphypergeometric1}) and (\ref{asymphypergeometric2}), we get
\begin{equation}
\label{cociente}
\left.
\begin{array}{rcl}
\displaystyle{\lim_{L\to\infty}}\frac{Az'_{1}(w_{2})+Bz'_{2}(w_{2})}{Az_{1}(w_{2})+Bz_{2}(w_{2})}&=&\left(\frac{1+k\lambda}{2}\right)
\displaystyle{\lim_{L\to\infty}}\frac{M(1+a,2,d_{2}L)(C_{1}A+C_{2}B)}{M(a,1,d_{2}L)(C_{1}A+C_{2}B)}\\
&=&\left(\frac{1+k\lambda}{2}\right)\displaystyle{\lim_{L\to\infty}\frac{\frac{\Gamma(2)}{\Gamma(1+a)}(-d_{2}L)^{-(1+a)}}
{\frac{\Gamma(1)}{\Gamma(a)}}(-d_{2}L)^{-a}}\\
&=&0.
\end{array}
\right\}
\end{equation}
Substituting this in \eqref{eq:ratio1}, we obtain
\begin{equation*}
\lim_{L\to\infty} \frac{f_{\xi}(0;\lambda)}{f(0;\lambda)} = k.
\end{equation*}
Therefore, equation (\ref{al2}) becomes $\mu_{0}(0)k=\beta_{1}(k)\lambda -\beta_{2}(k)$. Using $\sigma=U_{0}/\lambda$ and expressions for the coefficients from $\eqref{coef}_2$, we obtain
$$\sigma=kU_{0}\frac{(\mu_{2}-\mu_{0}(0))}{(\mu_{2}+\mu_{0}(0))}-\frac{Tk^{3}}{(\mu_{2}+\mu_{0}(0)).}$$
which is the classical formula for Saffman-Taylor instability of the leading interface. Similarly, we can also recover the the classical formula for Saffman-Taylor instability of the trailing interface by reversing the shooting technique as discussed at the end of section \ref{subsection:constant-viscosity}.
\vskip0.1truein
\noindent\underline{\bf Second case} (When $L\to 0$):\ Similar to the previous case, we will first need to get asymptotic approximations for $z_1(w_2), z_2(w_2), z_1'(w_2)$, and $z_2'(w_2
)$ in this limit. Notice that in this case, singularities of the confluent hypergeometric function of the second kind will arise. Now, we give the following asymptotic results from Abramowit
z and Stegun~\cite{Abramowitz:1964}
\begin{equation}
\label{asymphypergeometric3}
\left. \begin{array}{rcl}
U(1-a,1,-d_{j}L)&=& \displaystyle{- \frac{1}{\Gamma(1-a)}\left( \ln(\vert d_{j}L \vert) +\Psi(1-a) \right) +O(L\ln L)}\\
U(2-a,2,-d_{j}L)&=& \displaystyle{\frac{\Gamma(2-1)}{\Gamma(2-a)} \vert d_{j} L \vert^{1-2} +O(\ln L), }
\end{array}
\right\}
\end{equation}
where we recall that $d_{1}$ and $d_{2}$ are defined by \eqref{factores}. Similar to the calculations of the previous case $L\to\infty$, we present the dominant terms of the left hand side of (\ref{al2}). It is worth pointing out that due to \eqref{asymphypergeometric3}, the derivative of the confluent hypergeometric function of the second kind is dominant.
From the definition of the coefficients $C_{1},\ D_{1},\ C_{2}$ and $D_{2}$ given in \eqref{coef2} and the asymptotic results presented in \eqref{asymphypergeometric3}, we obtain
\begin{equation}
\label{asymz1}
\begin{array}{rcl}
z_{1}(d_{2}L) &\sim& \displaystyle{\frac{1}{W\lbrace 1,2\rbrace} \left( \frac{1-k\lambda}{2} \right)\left\lbrace \frac{\Gamma(1)}{\Gamma(1-a)}\right\rbrace\vert d_{1}L\vert^{-1}}\\
z'_{1}(d_{2}L)&\sim& \frac{1}{W\lbrace 1,2 \rbrace}\left(\frac{1}{2}+\frac{k\lambda}{2}\right)\left(\frac{1}{2}-\frac{k\lambda}{2}\right)\displaystyle{\frac{\left\lbrace \frac{1}{\vert d_{1}L\vert}- \frac{1}{\vert d_{2}L\vert} \right\rbrace}{\Gamma(1+a)}}.\\
\end{array}
\end{equation}
We remark that
\begin{equation*}
z'_{1}(d_{2}L)\sim C_{1}\left(\frac{1+k\lambda}{2}\right)+D_{1}\left(\frac{1-k\lambda}{2}\right)\frac{\Gamma(1)}{\Gamma(2-a)}|d_{2}L|^{-1}
\end{equation*}
and therefore the asymptotic result for $z'_{1}(w_{2})$ follows from the definition of the coefficient $C_{1}$ and $D_{1}$, see (\ref{coef2}). From the forms of $C_{1},\ D_{1},\ C_{2}$ and $D_{2}$, we get $z_{2}(w_{2})=o(z_{1}(w_{2})).$ Therefore
\begin{equation}
\label{asymz2}
\frac{Az_{1}(w_{2}) + Bz_{2}(w_{2})}{Az_{1}(w_{2})}\sim 1.
\end{equation}
Similarly, we obtain
\begin{equation}
\label{asymz'2}
\left.
\begin{array}{rcl}
z_{2}'(w_{2})& \sim & -D_{2}e^{w_{2}}U'(1-a,1,-w_{2})\\
& \sim & \displaystyle{\frac{1}{W\lbrace 1,2 \rbrace}\left(\frac{1-k\lambda}{2}\right)U(2-a,2,-w_{2})e^{w_{2}}}\\
& \sim & \displaystyle{\frac{1}{W\lbrace 1,2 \rbrace}\left(\frac{1-k\lambda}{2}\right)\left\lbrace \displaystyle{ \frac{\Gamma(1)}{\Gamma(2-a)}} \right\rbrace|d_{2}L|^{-1}}\\
&\sim&\frac{1}{\Gamma(1-a)}\frac{1}{W\lbrace 1,2\rbrace}\frac{1}{|d_{2}L|}
\end{array}
\right\}
\end{equation}
Using \eqref{asymz1}, \eqref{asymz2}, and \eqref{asymz'2}, it follows that
\begin{equation*}
\begin{array}{rcl}
\displaystyle{\lim_{L\to 0}}\frac{f_{\xi}(0;\lambda)}{f(0;\lambda)}&=& k\left(1-2\displaystyle{\lim_{L\to0}\frac{Az'_{1}(w_{2})+Bz'_{2}(w_{2})}{Az_{1}(w_{2})+Bz_{2}(w_{2})}}\right)\\
&=&k\left(1-2\displaystyle{ \lim_{L\to 0}\frac{Az'_{1}(w_{2})+Bz'_{2}(w_{2})}{Az_{1}(w_{2})}}\right)\\
\\
&=&k\left(1-2\displaystyle{ \lim_{L\to 0}\frac{\frac{Aa}{\Gamma(1-a)}\left( \frac{1}{|d_{1}|} - \frac{1}{|d_{2}|} \right)\frac{1}{L}+B\left( \frac{1}{\Gamma(1-a)} \right)\left( \frac{1}{|d_{2}L|} \right) }{A\left( \frac{1}{\Gamma(1-a)} \right)\left( \frac{1}{|d_{1}L|} \right)}}\right)\\
\\
&=&k\left(1-2\displaystyle{\lim_{L\to 0} \frac{Aa\left( \frac{1}{|d_{1}|} - \frac{1}{|d_{2}|} \right)|d_{1}| + B\frac{|d_{1}|}{|d_{2}|}}{A}}\right)\\
\\
&=&k\left(1-2\displaystyle{ \lim_{L\to 0} \frac{Aa\left( 1 - \frac{|d_{1}|}{|d_{2}|} \right) + B\frac{|d_{1}|}{|d_{2}|}}{A}}\right).
\end{array}
\end{equation*}
From the definition of $d_{1}$ and $d_{2}$ given in \eqref{factores} we obtain $d_{1}/d_{2}=\mu_{0}(-L)/\mu_{0}(0)$ and therefore
\begin{equation*}
\lim_{L\to 0}\frac{f_{\xi}(0;\lambda)}{f(0;\lambda)}=k\left[1-2\left(\frac{1+k\lambda}{2}\right)\left(\frac{\mu_{0}(0)-\mu_{0}(-L)}{\mu_{0}(0)} \right)-2\frac{B}{A}\frac{\mu_{0}(-L)}{\mu_{0}(0)}\right],
\end{equation*}
where $A=\mu_{0}(-L)e^{kL}$ and $B=-\left(\frac{\alpha_{1}(k)\lambda+\alpha_{2}(k)-k\mu_{0}(-L)}{2k}\right)e^{kL}$. It then follows that
\begin{equation*}
\lim_{L\to 0} \mu_{0}(0)\frac{f_{\xi}(0;\lambda)}{f(0;\lambda)} = \left[ \alpha_{1}(k)-k^2(\mu_{0}(0)-\mu_{0}(-L))\right]\lambda+\alpha_{2}(k).
\end{equation*}
Using this in equation (\ref{al2}), we obtain
$$\left[ \alpha_{1}(k)-k^2(\mu_{0}(0)-\mu_{0}(-L))\right]\lambda+\alpha_{2}(k)=\beta_{1}(k)\lambda-\beta_{2}(k) $$
which is equivalent to
$$\left((\alpha_{1}(k)-\beta_{1}(k))-{k^2}(\mu_{0}(0)-\mu_{0}(-L))\right)\lambda=-\alpha_{2}(k)-\beta_{2}(k).$$
After substituting the values of $\alpha_1(k)$, $\alpha_2(k)$, $\beta_1(k)$ and $\beta_2(k)$ and simplifying we obtain
\begin{equation*}
\begin{array}{c}
\left(\frac{S+T}{U_{0}}k^{4}+k^{2}(\mu_{1}-\mu_{2}\right)\lambda=-k(\mu_{2}+\mu_{1}).
\end{array}
\end{equation*}
Therefore,
$$\sigma=-\frac{(S+T)}{(\mu_{2}+\mu_{1})}k^{3}+U_{0}k\frac{(\mu_{2}-\mu_{1})}{(\mu_{2}+\mu_{1})},$$
which is the formula for the growth rate of an interface with surface tension $(S+T)$, which is what should be expected in this limit. Thus we recover the classical formula for the growth rate in this limit.
\section{Conclusions}\label{conclusions}
We converted a non-standard eigenvalue problem arising in the linear stability analysis of a three-layer Hele-Shaw model of enhanced oil recovery to a boundary value problem for
Kummer's equation when the middle layer has a linear viscous profile. We presented the general solution in terms of Frobenius series and discussed the convergence properties of these
series solutions. We also formally gave the dispersion relation implicitly through the existence criterion for non-trivial solutions.
In order to recover the well-known physical solutions for some limiting cases, we rewrote the general solutions using a different set of fundamental solutions and analyzed these
for those limiting cases: (i) when the viscous profile of the middle layer approaches a constant viscosity, both in the case of a fixed-length middle layer and also as the length
of the middle layer appraoches infinity; and (ii) when the length of the middle layer approaches zero. We showed that we were thus able to recover the correct physical solutions.
\medskip
\section*{\bf Acknowledgments:}\
This paper was made possible by an NPRP grant \# 08-777-1-141 to one of the authors (Prabir Daripa) from the Qatar National Research Fund (a member of the Qatar Foundation). The second author (Oscar Orellana) acknowledges financial support through this grant for travel to TAMUQ, Qatar for a two day workshop on ``International Workshop on Enhanced Oil Recovery and Porous Media Flows" organized by the first author (Prabir Daripa) during July 31st and August 1 of 2013. The work of the second author (Oscar Orellana) was also supported in part by Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Centifico y Technologico (FONDECYT) under grant 1141260 and Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria, Valparaiso, Chile.
The statements made herein are solely the responsibility of the authors.
\bigskip
\section*{Appendix: Kummer's Equation}\label{section:appendix3}
Kummer's equation has the general form
\[
w \frac{d^2z}{dw^2} + (b-w) \frac{dz}{dw} - az = 0,
\]
where $b=1$ and $a=\frac12(1+\frac{kU_0}\sigma).$ The two linearly independent solutions are $z_1(a,b,w)$ and $z_2(a,b,w)$ where the general expression for $z_1(a,b,w)$ is given by
\begin{equation*}
z_1(a,b,w) = \frac{a_0}{b_0}+\frac{a_1w}{b_1} + \frac{a_2w^2}{b_2\,2!} +
\frac{a_3w^3}{b_3\,3!} +\cdots+ \frac{a_nw^n}{b_n\,n!} +\cdots
\end{equation*}
where
\begin{align*}
&a_0=1, a_1=a, a_n=a(a+1)(a+2)\cdots (a+n-1),\quad{\rm for}\ n=2,3,\cdots\\
&b_0=1, b_1=b, b_n=b(b+1)(b+2)\cdots (b+n-1),\quad{\rm for}\ n=2,3,\cdots
\end{align*}
The linearly independent second solution $z_2(a,b,w)$ is similarly given by a series which can be easily constructed by the method of Frobenius.
\bigskip
|
\section{Introduction}
\label{sect:intro}
Massive stars always form in dense molecular clouds and transfer a great amount of energy from their ionizing fluxes and stellar winds to the surrounding interstellar medium (ISM). This affects the kinetic and thermal energy of the molecular clouds so as to change the velocity structure and the morphologies of the clouds substantially. The ionizing photons from a massive star can ionize the surrounding ISM and form an H II region. In a uniform environment, the H II region will be spherical and is called Str\"{o}mgren sphere \citep{str39}. However, observations show that a large number of young H II regions have a cometary morphology \citep{woo89,kur94,wal98}. \citet{ten79} pointed out that these cometary H II regions result from the density gradients in the molecular cloud. In this explanation, the comet-shaped H II regions are called blister H II regions or named as champagne flows. The Orion Nebula is the archetype of this kind of H II regions. Observation shows that there is a bright ionization front on the surface of a molecular cloud and ionized gas flows away from the cloud \citep{isr78}. The champagne flow model was first created by Tenorio-Tagle and coworkers \citep{ten79,bod79,yor83}. In these studies, the H II region is assumed to form in a uniform molecular cloud, but close to the boundary of it. The H II region will expand and break out into the intercloud medium of low density to form a shock. The Mach numbers of the resulting shocks are shown to be $30-42$, and the velocities of the ionized gas can reach up to $40~km~s^{-1}$. Since then, a series models were developed by including the effect of a stellar wind, a magnetic field or an exponential density distribution \citep{com97,art06,gen12}. In all of these models, a density gradient is assumed to exist, which is considered as the main cause of the cometary morphology.
There is an alternative explanation to the cometary shape of H II regions called bow shock. In this kind of models, a wind-blowing ionizing star moves supersonically with respect to the dense molecular cloud, and forms a shock in front of the star. A cometary H II region can also form in this case \citep{mac91,bur92}. \citet{wil96} created an analytic model to derive the bow shock characteristics. Other researchers made a series numerical models to simulate bow shocks \citep{com98,art06}. The presence of the density gradient seems unavoidable in the non-homogeneous environment in molecular clouds. High speed stars are not common in the Galaxy. But, it can happen in the region with a high stellar density, such as massive star forming regions. Hence, it is necessary to compare the two possible causes of cometary H II region to interpret observations.
\citet{art06} pointed out that simple champagne flows without a stellar wind will not show a limb-brightened morphology. By contrast, bow shock models always display this morphology. They also pointed out that the two kinds of models can be distinguished in the kinematics. For example, the highest velocity of ionized gas with respect to the molecular clouds is at the head of the cometary H II region in the bow shock models while it exists at the tail in a champagne flow model. It is the most notable that the directions of motion of the ionized gas at the head are always toward the molecular clouds in bow shock models but could be away from the clouds in champagne flow models \citep{art06}. Since the profiles of emission lines are partly determined by kinematics, this difference in kinematics could lead to different line profiles. Line profiles are direct observing properties that can be accessed with high resolution observations. Therefore, line profiles can be used as the criterion to select better models for certain observations.
In this paper, we present the profiles of the [Ne II] $12.81 \mu m$ line, the [Ne III] $15.55 \mu m$ line and the hydrogen $H30\alpha$ ($31-30$) recombination line from cometary H II regions by simulating bow shock models and champagne flow models with different parameters. The [Ne II] $12.81 \mu m$ line is the brightest line from HII regions in the mid-infrared, which can be accessed by TEXES on IRTF or EXES on Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy (SOFIA). The [Ne III] $15.55\mu m$ line can not be observed from the ground. In order to investigate the profile of the [Ne III] $15.55\mu m$ line, we have to rely on future space telescopes. The $H30\alpha$ line can be observed by Caltech Submillimeter Observatory (CSO). These lines are useful to study the gas kinematics of compact HII regions. We compare the line profiles between the bow shock models and champagne flow models and discuss the possibility to distinguish these two kinds of models based on these line profiles. The organization of this paper is as follows: In \S 2, we describe the method of our numerical simulation. In \S 3, we present the results of the numerical models. \S 4 show our conclusions.
\section{Method}
\subsection{Method of Hydrodynamics, Radiative Transfer and Thermal Processes}
It is necessary to simulate the time evolution of the cometary H II regions in order to obtain the profiles of lines of interest. To correctly describe the time evolution of the regions, one has to treat the transportation of energy properly. In the situation of emission nebula, the gravity is not important, but the hydrodynamics and the radiative transfer are essential processes for energy transportation. In this paper, both hydrodynamics and radiative transfer are considered.
A 2D explicit Eulerian hydrodynamic method is used to treat the evolution on a cylindrically symmetric grid. Most of the models in this work are computed on a $250\times500$ grid. A big grid of $400\times400$ is used when computing blister H II region model to check the contribution of the ionized gas far from the star at the sides to the emission line profile. The results show that the grid of $250\times500$ is enough. The cell size of the grids is chosen to be $dr=0.005~pc$. A HLLC Riemann solver \citep{miy05} is used to solve the hydrodynamic conservation equations.
When treating the radiative transfer, we consider the star as a single source for ionizing and dissociating radiation. We solve the radiative transfer for EUV ($hv\geq13.6eV$) and FUV ($11.26eV\leq hv<13.6eV$), respectively \citep{dia98}. The black body spectrum is assumed for the ionizing star. We assumed the "on the spot" approximation when treating ionizing photons. For dissociating radiation, because the column density of molecular hydrogen exceeds $10^{14} cm^{-2}$ in our models, the FUV lines are optically thick. Thus, the self-shielding by $H_2$ becomes important \citep{hol99}. The dissociation rate and reformation rate of hydrogen molecules are calculated by using a simple self-shielding approximation introduced in \citet{dra96} and the method in \citet{hol99}, respectively. The dissociation and reformation of CO molecules are also included in the models, following the methods given by \citet{lee96} and \citet{nel97}.
In the ionized region, the photoionization heating is considered as the only heating process \citep{spi78}. We use the cooling curve for solar abundances given by \citet{mel02} to compute the radiative cooling rate. This cooling curve is derived on the assumption that the cooling of the gas is due to collisional excitation of hydrogen and metal lines and hydrogen recombination. Outside of the H II region, the heating processes of the gas include photoelectric heating, heating from photodissociation, reformation of hydrogen, cosmic ray and FUV pumping of $H_2$ molecules as heating processes. The following cooling processes are considered: atomic fine-structure lines of [O I] $63\mu m$, [O I] $146\mu m$ and [C II] $158\mu m$, the rotational and vibrational transitions of $CO$ and $H_2$, dust recombination and gas-grain collisions \citep{hol79,tie85,hol89,bak94,hos06}. Since the results of the photodissociation region will not be presented in this paper, the purpose of including the radiative transfer of the photodissociation radiation is mainly to conserve the energy and momentum of the gas.
\subsection{Line profiles}
After we solve the continuum, momentum and energy equations of the hydrodynamic models, the method derived by \citet{gla07} is applied to compute the line luminosity for the [Ne II], [Ne III] and $H30\alpha$ lines. The line luminosity $L$ at a given velocity $v$ is as follow:
\begin{equation}
L(v)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}v_{th}}\int \textrm{exp}(-\frac{[v-v_{los}(\textbf{r})]^2}{2v_{th}^2})f_{ul}(i)dV~, \\
\end{equation}
\begin{equation}
f_{ul}(i)=\begin{cases}
b_kN_kA_{ul}h\nu_{ul} & for~H30\alpha,~k=31,~i=0 \\
Ab_{Ne}X(Ne^+)nP_uA_{ul}h\nu_{ul} & for~\textrm{[Ne II]},~i=1 \\
Ab_{Ne}X(Ne^{2+})nP_uA_{ul}h\nu_{ul} & for~\textrm{[Ne III]},~i=2
\end{cases}~~~~,
\end{equation}
where $v_{los}(\textbf{r})$ is the line-of-sight component of the velocity vector. $h\nu_{ul}$ is the photon energy. $v_{th}$ is the thermal velocity of gas. $b_kN_k$ is the number density of hydrogen atoms in the kth electronic energy level ($k=31$ for $H30\alpha$). $N_k$ is the theoretical value for the number density in the kth level expected in LTE and is proportional to $n_e^2$. $b_k$ is departure coefficient \citep{sea59}. $n$ is the number density of $H$ nuclei. The abundance of $Ne$, $Ab_{Ne} = 1.0\times10^{-4}$, is adopted in these models \citep{hol01}. $A_{ul}$ is the Einstein emission coefficient for corresponding transitions \citep{ale08,gla07}. $X(Ne^+)$ and $X(Ne^{2+})$ are the fraction of $Ne^+$ and $Ne^{2+}$ ions, respectively. $P_u$ is the excitation fraction of the upper state and is computed as in \citet{gla07}:
\begin{equation}
P_u=\begin{cases}
[2(1+n_{cr}/n_e)exp(1122.8/T)+1]^{-1} & for~\textrm{[Ne II]} \\
[1+(5/3)(1+n_{cr1}/n_e)exp(925.3/T)+(1/3)(1+n_{cr2}/n_e)exp(-399/T)]^{-1} & for~\textrm{[Ne III]}
\end{cases}~~~~.
\end{equation}
where the critical density $n_{cr}=5.53\times10^3T^{0.5}~cm^{-3}$, $n_{cr1}=3.94\times10^3T^{0.5}~cm^{-3}$ and $n_{cr2}=7.2\times10^2T^{0.5}~cm^{-3}$. The relative fractions of $Ne$, $Ne^+$ and $Ne^{2+}$ ($X(Ne)+X(Ne^+)+X(Ne^{2+})=1$) are computed through the ionization-recombination balance equations. The photoionzation cross sections, the recombination rate coefficients and the charge exchange rate coefficient are given by \citet{hen70}, \citet{peq91} and \citet{gla07}, respectively.
The collisional ionization of $Ne$ is not considered in photoionized region where temperature is much lower than the critical temperature $T_{c}=2.50\times10^5~K$, and the gas density is relatively low. The contribution of the hot stellar wind bubble ($T=10^{6-8}~K$) to line luminosities is negligible because of its low density ($n<5~cm^{-3}$). Hence, collisional ionization of neon atoms is not considered. In addition, since the average energy of photons from young stars are not high energy, the fractions of highly ionized ions as $Ne^{3+}$ and $Ne^{4+}$ are generally not considered \citep{mor02}. This conclusion is also suggested by our calculations. We have tested calculating the relative fractions of $Ne^{3+}$ ions and other higher ionization state $Ne$ ions. They are always lower than $0.002$ in photoionized region, and can be safely neglected. X rays and EUV photons with energies greater than 21.56eV can both photoionize neon, but we neglect X-ray ionization because of the lack of x ray sources relative to EUV photons. The results of the $H30\alpha$ recombination line can be applied to other $H$ recombination lines. They have the same normalized profile when the pressure broadening effect can be neglected.
In this paper, we assume that the observers are viewing the cometary regions from the tail to the head. Therefore, a blue-shifted velocity suggests that the gas mainly moves at a direction from the head to the tail and a red-shifted velocity suggests the gas mainly moves at the opposite direction.
\section{Results}
In this section, seven models are presented. Four of them are bow shock models, and the rest are champagne flow models. The parameters of these models are presented in Table \ref{tab_modc}. These models are selected to test the effects of different model ingredients on the line profiles. The values of stellar parameters are based on \citet{dia98} and \citet{dal13}. The initial density is consistent with the condition in compact H II region. In the following section, the models will be described and analyzed individually.
\begin{table}[!htp]\footnotesize
\centering
\begin{tabular}{l|llll|ll}
\hline
Model & $\dot{M}(M_\odot yr^{-1}) $ & $v_\ast(km~s^{-1})$ & $v_w (km~s^{-1})$ & $log[S_{UV}(s^{-1})]$ & $n_0(cm^{-3})$ & Scale Height(pc) \\
\hline
A & $9.93\times10^{-7}$ & 10 & $2720.1$ & 48.78 & 8000 & 0 \\
B & $9.93\times10^{-7}$ & 0 & $2720.1$ & 48.78 & 8000 & 0.05 \\
\hline
C & $9.93\times10^{-7}$ & 0 & $2720.1$ & 48.78 & 8000 & 0.15 \\
\hline
D & $9.93\times10^{-7}$ & 15 & $2720.1$ & 48.78 & 8000 & 0 \\
E & $9.93\times10^{-7}$ & 5 & $2720.1$ & 48.78 & 8000 & 0 \\
\hline
F & $3.56\times10^{-7}$ & 0 & $1986.3$ & 48.10 & 8000 & 0.05 \\
G & $3.56\times10^{-7}$ & 10 & $1986.3$ & 48.10 & 8000 & 0 \\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\caption{The model parameters in model A-G.\label{tab_modc}}
\end{table}
\subsection{Model A}
In Model A, we simulate a stellar bow shock in a uniform medium with the number density of $n_0=8000~cm^{-3}$. The velocity of the moving star is assumed to be $v_\ast=10~km~s^{-1}$. When simulating bow shock models, we carry out the calculation in the rest frame of the star first, so that the same procedures can also be used in the champagne flow cases. After the calculation, we convert all velocities to the values in the rest frame of molecular clouds. The velocities presented in this paper are all in the frame of reference of molecular clouds. In all models, the z-axis is parallel to the symmetrical axis and the positive direction is from the tail to the head of the cometary region. The star is at the position of $(x,z)=(0,0)$. The effective temperature of the star is $40,000K$. The numbers of ionization photons ($h\upsilon \geq 13.6eV$) and the photodissociation photons ($11.26\leq h\upsilon<13.6eV$) emitted from the star per second are $10^{48.78}s^{-1}$ and $10^{48.76}s^{-1}$, respectively. The mass-loss rate is $\dot{M}=9.93\times10^{-7} M_\odot yr^{-1}$, and the terminal velocity of the stellar wind is $v_w=2720.1~km~s^{-1}$. These parameters are consistent with a star of mass $M_\ast=40.9~M_\odot$ \citep{dia98,dal13}.
Our simulation is stopped at $120,000~yr$. Before that time, the ionization front ahead of the star has been approximately motionless relative to the star for a few $10^4$ years. In Figure \ref{fig_moda1}, the number density of all materials, $H^+$, $Ne^+$ and $Ne^{2+}$ ions in model A are presented. A stellar wind bubble of low density ($n<5~cm^{-3}$) can be seen around the star. The bubble is surrounded by the photoionizated region of high density ($n\sim200-20000~cm^{-3}$), and a dense neutral shell ($n\sim10^{5-6}~cm^{-3}$). In the right panel of Figure \ref{fig_moda1}, the density distributions of $Ne^+$ and $Ne^{2+}$ ions are shown in grey scales. the $Ne^+$ and $Ne^{2+}$ ions distribute in the whole H II region, but we only show the number density higher than $10^{-1.8}~cm^{-3}$ in order to highlight the different distributions between $Ne^+$ and $Ne^{2+}$ ions. Although the high densities in the head of the H II region, which is defined as the ionized region of $z>0$, leads to the high densities of both $Ne^+$ and $Ne^{2+}$ there, the density of $Ne^+$ ions roughly increases with the distance from the star in the head of the H II region. The density of $Ne^{2+}$, by contrast, decreases with the distance in the head region. Large fluxes of the photons with energy higher than the ionization potential of $Ne^+$ can increase the ionization rate from $Ne^+$ into $Ne^{2+}$ at the locations near the star. On the contrary, high electron density in the head region would increase the recombination rate. This leads to the different density distributions of $Ne^+$ and $Ne^{2+}$ ions.
\begin{figure}[!htp]
\centering
\includegraphics[scale=.45]{figmoda12p.eps}
\includegraphics[scale=.45]{figmoda34p.eps}
\caption{Gas density at logarithmic scales at the age of $120,000~yrs$. In the left panel, the top half of the figure shows the total density of the gas and the bottom half shows the density of $H^+$ ions. The right panel shows the densities of $Ne^+$ ions (top half) and $Ne^{2+}$ ions (bottom half).}
\begin{flushleft}
\end{flushleft}
\label{fig_moda1}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure}[!htp]
\centering
\includegraphics[scale=.45]{figdiscussion1.eps}
\includegraphics[scale=.45]{figdiscussion2.eps}
\caption{The velocity fields of photoionized gas in model A (bow shock, left) and model B (champagne flow, right). The velocity fields in the stellar wind bubble($n < 50~cm^{-3}$) and outside the H II region ($X(H^+) < 0.1$) are not shown. The arrows represent velocities of $v > 1~km~s^{-1}$, and the lengths of them are proportional to their absolute values. The position of the star is (0,0). The five contour levels are at $50$, $500$, $2000$, $20000$ and $100000~cm^{-3}$.}
\begin{flushleft}
\end{flushleft}
\label{fig_discus}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure}[!htp]
\centering
\includegraphics[scale=.33]{figmodal1.eps}
\includegraphics[scale=.33]{figmodal2.eps}
\includegraphics[scale=.33]{figmodal3.eps}
\caption{profiles of the [Ne II] $12.81 \mu m$ line (left), the $H30\alpha$ line (middle) and the [Ne III] $15.55 \mu m$ line (right) from the cometary H II regions in model A for three inclination angles ($0^o,~30^o,~60^o$).}
\begin{flushleft}
\end{flushleft}
\label{fig_moda}
\end{figure}
\begin{table}[!htp]\footnotesize
\centering
\begin{tabular}{l|llll|l}
\hline
Line & Inclination & Peak & FWHM & FWCV & Luminosity \\
& & ($km~s^{-1}$) & ($km~s^{-1}$) & ($km~s^{-1}$) & ($erg~s^{-1}$) \\
\hline
[Ne II] $12.81 \mu m$ & $0^o$ & 3.1 & 20.8 & -3.32 & $7.75\times10^{35}$ \\
& $30^o$ & 2.5 & 19.0 & -2.92 \\
& $60^o$ & 0.9 & 13.0 & -1.70 \\
\hline
$H30\alpha$ & $0^o$ & -1.4 & 36.8 & -3.40 & $1.07\times10^{30}$ \\
& $30^o$ & -1.4 & 35.6 & -2.99 \\
& $60^o$ & -1 & 33.2 & -1.74 \\
\hline
[Ne III] $15.55 \mu m$ & $0^o$ & 1.7 & 17.6 & -3.28 & $1.03\times10^{36}$ \\
& $30^o$ & 1.7 & 16.6 & -2.85 \\
& $60^o$ & 0.9 & 13.0 & -1.64 \\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\caption{Peaks, FWHMs and flux weighted central velocities(FWCV) of lines at different angles in model A\label{tab_moda}}
\end{table}
\begin{figure}[!htp]
\centering
\includegraphics[scale=.35]{figmodal5.eps}
\includegraphics[scale=.35]{figmodbl5.eps}
\caption{the line profiles of the [Ne II] $12.81 \mu m$ from the whole H II region, the head and boundary region and the rest part of the H II region. The left panel is for model A, and the right panel is for model B.}
\begin{flushleft}
\end{flushleft}
\label{fig_modals}
\end{figure}
In Figure \ref{fig_discus}, the velocity field of photoionized gas is shown. The result of the bow shock (model A) is shown in the left panel. A large proportion of ionized gas in the head of the H II region has red-shifted velocities at the direction from the tail to the head, and the velocities of the ionized gas in the boundary region, which is defined as a $0.025pc$ wide layer in the H II region near the ionization front, are approximately perpendicular to the ionization front. Particularly, the gas in front of the star moves at the similar direction as the stellar motion. The directions of motions of the ionized gas in the rest part of the H II region are gradually turned toward the tail. This phenomenon is because of the accelerations toward the tail due to the pressure density in the H II region. The details of this reason is discussed in \S \ref{sect:stellar motion}.
In Figure \ref{fig_moda}, the profiles of the [Ne II] line, the $H30\alpha$ line and the [Ne III] line from the H II region for different inclinations ($\theta=0^o,~30^o,~\textrm{and}~60^o$ from the z-axis ) are presented. The profiles are all asymmetrical, but the $H30\alpha$ line is more symmetric than other two lines. Both the [Ne II] line and the [Ne III] line profiles are skewed to the right and have a long tail at the left side. With increasing inclination angles, these line profiles become less asymmetrical and narrower. It is obvious that the $H30\alpha$ line is much broader than the [Ne II] line and the [Ne III] line. This is due to the larger thermal broadening of lower mass hydrogen.
In Table \ref{tab_moda}, the peak locations, FWHMs and flux weighted central velocities (FWCV) of the lines for three inclinations of $0^o$, $30^o$ and $60^o$ are shown. For the [Ne II] line, the peak locations and FWHMs of the profiles decrease with increasing inclination angles. Although the peak locations are all red-shifted ($3.1,~2.5~and~0.9~km~s^{-1}$), the flux weighted central velocities are all blue-shifted ($-3.32,~2.92~and~-1.70~km~s^{-1}$). This suggests that the contributions of blue-shifted tail in the profile are significant. Because the line profile for the inclination of $0^o$ seem to be consist of two components, we calculate the [Ne II] line profile from the head and the boundary region and the line profile from the rest part of the H II region, separately. These two line profiles are plotted in Figure \ref{fig_modals}. It can be seen that the emission from the head region and the boundary region leads to the red-shifted peak location of the total line profile, and and the gas from the rest part of the H II region mainly contributes to the blue-shifted tail of the line profile. The luminosity of the [Ne II] line is $7.75\times10^{35}~erg~s^{-1}$ which is independent of inclinations.
For the [Ne III] line, the peak locations are slightly red-shifted ($1.7,~1.7~and~0.9~km~s^{-1}$), and the flux weighted central velocities are all blue-shifted ($-3.4,~-2.99~and~-1.74~km~s^{-1}$). The reason of this is the same as in the [Ne II] line profile. The line luminosity of the [Ne III] line is $1.03\times10^{36}~erg~s^{-1}$. This value is larger than that of the [Ne II] line. For the $H30\alpha$ line, both the peak locations ($-1.4,~-1.4~and~-1.0~km~s^{-1}$) and the flux weighted central velocities ($-3.28,~-2.85~and~-1.64~km~s^{-1}$) are blue-shifted. This is due to the large thermal broadening of lower mass hydrogen. By increasing the broadening, the peak locations of all lines will approach the flux weighted central velocities. The blue-shift of the flux weighted central velocities of the hydrogen line suggests the blue-shifted gas motion dominates for the ionized gas in bow shock model. It seems odd that the ionized gas moves mainly at a direction opposite to the direction of the star and the shock structure. The reason is also the accelerations toward the tail due to the pressure density in the H II region. The luminosity of the $H30\alpha$ line is $1.07\times10^{30}~erg~s^{-1}$ in model A. This is much lower than the luminosities of the [Ne II] line and the [Ne III] line.
\subsection{Model B}
\label{sect:model B}
In model B, the evolution of a champagne flow including a stellar wind is simulated. The density distribution follows an exponential law as $n(z)=n_0exp(z/H)$. $z$ is the axial coordinate along the symmetrical axis and towards the center of molecular cloud. The density at the position of the motionless massive star ($z=0$) is $n_0=8000~cm^{-3}$ initially and the scale height is $H=0.05~pc$. The parameters of the massive star and the stellar wind are the same as in model A. In model B, the simulation of the time evolution is ceased at $160,000~yr$ when the line profiles are roughly stable. The H II region and the neutral region should reach approximate pressure equilibrium, and the champagne flow has completely cleared the low-density material from the grid at the time.
The density distribution in model B at the end of simulation is presented in Figure \ref{fig_modb}. As in model A, there are also a stellar bubble surrounded by the photoionized region and a dense neutral shell which separates the H II region from the dense cloud. The size of H II region in model B is bigger than in model A, but the total number of $H^+$ ions is only 0.74 of the number in model A. Hence, the average density of electrons in model B is lower than in model A. The low electron density decreases the recombination rate of $Ne^{2+}$ so that the number of the $Ne^+$ ions is only 0.38 of the number of the $Ne^{2+}$ ions in model B. In the tail, for the same reason, the relative fraction of $Ne^+$ is generally lower than 0.3 in model B while that is always higher than 0.6 there in model A. The difference in the numbers between the $Ne^+$ and $Ne^{2+}$ ions is easily found in the right panel of Figure \ref{fig_modb} where the density distributions of $Ne^+$ and $Ne^{2+}$ ions are presented. The velocity field of photoionized gas in model B is presented in the right panel of Figure \ref{fig_discus}. In the boundary region, the axial components of the velocities are low, and the ionized materials in the rest part of the H II region all have an apparently blue-shifted velocity for the inclination of $0^o$.
The line profiles from the H II region are plotted in Figure \ref{fig_modbl}. In model B, the line profiles are also asymmetrical as in model A. For the [Ne II] line, we separate the boundary region from the rest part of the H II region because the axial velocity gradually change along the symmetrical axis from $\sim0~km~s^{-1}$ at the boundary to $\sim-20~km~s^{-1}$ at the tail. The line profiles from these two regions are plotted in the right panel of Figure \ref{fig_modals}. The [Ne II] line profile is consist of two components: a narrow component with a slightly blue-shifted peak location contributed by the ionized gas in the boundary region and a highly blue-shifted broad component with the peak location at $v=-9.7~km~s^{-1}$ contributed by gas from the rest part. This suggests that gas in boundary region is not accelerated too much. Meanwhile, the ionized gas in the rest part has been accelerated to high velocities toward the tail direction. When the inclination angle increases, the highly blue-shifted component is affected strongly and the center of the component moves toward the red but a little change happens to the other component. It is obvious that the profiles of the [Ne II] line in model B are more biased to the left side than those in model A. In addition, because the number density is smaller than the critical densities of [Ne II] and [Ne III] lines in the H II region, the collisional de-excitation is not important for these lines. The fluxes of lines from a unit volume is $f_{ul}(i)\propto n_e^2$. So the number of the [Ne II] line photons emitted from the dense boundary region is not negligible relative to the total number although the number of the $Ne^+$ in the boundary region is just 0.08 of the total number. For the $H30\alpha$ line and the [Ne III] line, the proportions of $H^+$ and $Ne^{2+}$ ions in the boundary region are smaller. So the proportions of the emission from boundary region in the total emission are both less than that for the [Ne II] line.
In Table \ref{tab_modb}, the peak locations, the FWHMs and the FWCVs in model B are provided. For the [Ne II] line profiles, the peak locations ($-8.9,~-6.3,~-2.5~km~s^{-1}$) and the FWCVs ($-8.52,~-7.38,~-4.28~km~s^{-1}$) are all blue-shifted. The values of the peak locations and the FWCVs in model B become less blue-shifted with increasing inclination angles, and they are all much more blue-shifted than the corresponding values in model A. For the $H30\alpha$ recombination line, we find that both the peak locations ($-9.4,~-7.8,~-4.2~km~s^{-1}$) and the FWCVs ($-10.13,~-8.77,~-5.06~km~s^{-1}$) are much more blue-shifted than those in model A because the main part of the ionized gas in model B are forced to flow away from the molecular cloud due to the density gradient. For the [Ne III] line, both of the FWCVs ($-10.81,~-9.37,~-5.45~km~s^{-1}$) and the peak locations ($-9.3,~-7.5,~-3.7~km~s^{-1}$) of the profiles are easily distinguished from those in model A. This suggests the ionized gas in the inner part of the H II region has a high velocity ($\sim-10~km~s^{-1}$) towards the tail. Also in Table \ref{tab_modb}, the [Ne III] line profiles have the most blue-shifted peak locations and FWCVs in the three lines. We find that the three line luminosities are lower in model B than in model A. This is due to the lower density in model B.
\begin{figure}[!htp]
\centering
\includegraphics[scale=.45]{figmodb12p.eps}
\includegraphics[scale=.45]{figmodb34p.eps}
\caption{Gas density at logarithmic scales at the age of $160,000~yr$ in model B. The top half in the left panel shows the density of all materials. The bottom half in the left panel shows the density of $H^+$ ions. The top half in the right panel shows the density of $Ne^+$ ions. The bottom half in the right panel is for $Ne^{2+}$ ions. The density is in the units of $cm^{-3}$.}
\begin{flushleft}
\end{flushleft}
\label{fig_modb}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure}[!htp]
\centering
\includegraphics[scale=.33]{figmodbll1.eps}
\includegraphics[scale=.33]{figmodbll2.eps}
\includegraphics[scale=.33]{figmodbll3.eps}
\caption{profiles of the [Ne II] $12.81 \mu m$ line (left), the $H30\alpha$ line (middle) and the [Ne III] $15.55 \mu m$ line (right) from the cometary H II regions in model B for three inclination angles ($0^o,~30^o,~60^o$).}
\begin{flushleft}
\end{flushleft}
\label{fig_modbl}
\end{figure}
\subsection{Comparison between Champagne Flow and Bow Shock Models}
We have calculated model A as a bow shock model and model B as a champagne flow model and obtain the line profiles, peak locations and FWCVs of the [Ne II] $12.81\mu m$ line, the $H30\alpha$ line and the [Ne III] $15.55\mu m$ line. It is worth to point out that line profiles and peak locations can be influenced by broadening. For example, if we change the broadening to be $5~km~s^{-1}$ , the peak location of the [Ne II] line profile for the inclination of $0^o$ in model A will be changed to be $1.1~km~s^{-1}$ from $3.1~km~s^{-1}$. But the FWCVs are independent of the broadening.
For the $H30\alpha$ line, both of the peak locations and the FWCVs in model A are much less blue-shifted than in model B for every inclinations. The FWCVs in model A are all higher than $-3.3~km~s^{-1}$, but those in model B are all lower than $-5~km~s^{-1}$. For the [Ne III] line, the difference is more apparent. The peak locations in model A are red-shifted while those in model B are blue-shifted for every inclinations. The FWCVs of the [Ne III] line in model A are all higher than $-3.5~km~s^{-1}$, but in model B they are all lower than $-5.4~km~s^{-1}$. Especially for the inclination of zero, the difference of the FWCVs in these two models is the largest and equal to $7.41~km~s^{-1}$. For the [Ne II] line, it is also the case that the emission is generally more blue-shifted in model B than in model A. And the FWCVs and the line profiles between these two models are also much different.
So it is possible to distinguish a champagne flow from a bow shock by using the [Ne II] line. And the difference between the champagne flow and bow shock is more obvious in the $H30\alpha$ line and the [Ne III] line. In order to check whether these conclusions are applicable in more general cases of champagne flows and bow shocks, we compute other models and test the effects of the density gradient, the velocity of the moving star, the mass of the star on the line profiles of the three lines.
\subsubsection{Density Gradient in the Champagne Flow}
A Champagne flow model with a shallow density gradient ($H=0.15pc$) is computed in model C. The other parameters are kept same as in model B. We cease the evolution in model C at $160,000yr$ as in model B. The line profiles are also roughly stable, and the pressure equilibrium has been formed.
The line profiles and properties of the H II regions for model B and C are shown in Figure \ref{fig_modcde} and Table \ref{tab_modcde}.
In model C, the H II regions can also be divided into a boundary region and the rest region as in model B. The velocities in the boundary region are only slightly blue-shifted and close to zero, and the gas in the rest part of the H II region has a obviously blue-shifted velocity. Because of the shallow density gradient, the peak location of the [Ne II] line profile from the rest part of the H II region is at $-7.2~km~s^{-1}$. This suggests that acceleration of the ionized gas is smaller in model C than in model B. Beside this, the line profiles for model C are similar to those for model B.
In Table \ref{tab_modcde}, we find that the peak locations and the FWCVs of the three lines are all blue-shifted. The values of the FWCVs and the peak locations in model C are slightly less blue-shifted than the corresponding values in model B. And as in model B, the FWCVs and the peak locations of the [Ne III] line have the most blue-shifted values in the line profiles of the three lines.
Our calculations suggest that the line profiles become more blue-shifted with the increasing density gradient for the champagne flow models.
\begin{figure}[!htp]
\centering
\includegraphics[scale=.33]{figmodbll1.eps}
\includegraphics[scale=.33]{figmodbll2.eps}
\includegraphics[scale=.33]{figmodbll3.eps}
\includegraphics[scale=.33]{figmodcll1.eps}
\includegraphics[scale=.33]{figmodcll2.eps}
\includegraphics[scale=.33]{figmodcll3.eps}
\caption{The profiles of the [Ne II] $12.81 \mu m$ line (left panels), the $H30\alpha$ line (middle panels) and the [Ne III] $15.55 \mu m$ line (right panels) from the H II regions for three inclination angles in model B (top panels) and model C (bottom panels).}
\begin{flushleft}
\end{flushleft}
\label{fig_modcde}
\end{figure}
\begin{table}[!htp]\footnotesize
\centering
\begin{tabular}{l|llll|l}
\hline
Model B $H=0.05pc$ \\
\hline
Line & Inclination & Peak & FWHM & FWCV & Luminosity \\
& & ($km~s^{-1}$) & ($km~s^{-1}$) & ($km~s^{-1}$) & ($erg~s^{-1}$) \\
\hline
[Ne II] $12.81 \mu m$ & $0^o$ & -8.9 & 15.4 & -8.52 & $3.43\times10^{35}$ \\
& $30^o$ & -6.3 & 13.8 & -7.38 \\
& $60^o$ & -2.5 & 10.8 & -4.28 \\
\hline
$H30\alpha$ & $0^o$ & -9.4 & 36.0 & -10.13 & $6.08\times10^{29}$ \\
& $30^o$ & -7.8 & 35.6 & -8.77 \\
& $60^o$ & -4.2 & 35.6 & -5.06 \\
\hline
[Ne III] $15.55 \mu m$ & $0^o$ & -9.3 & 11.4 & -10.81 & $6.60\times10^{35}$ \\
& $30^o$ & -7.5 & 11.8 & -9.37 \\
& $60^o$ & -3.7 & 12.0 & -5.45 \\
\hline
Model E $H=0.15pc$ \\
\hline
Line & Inclination & Peak & FWHM & FWCV & Luminosity \\
& & ($km~s^{-1}$) & ($km~s^{-1}$) & ($km~s^{-1}$) & ($erg~s^{-1}$) \\
\hline
[Ne II] $12.81 \mu m$ & $0^o$ & -6.3 & 15.6 & -6.60 & $3.68\times10^{35}$\\
& $30^o$ & -4.7 & 13.6 & -5.70 \\
& $60^o$ & -2.1 & 9.8 & -3.29 \\
\hline
$H30\alpha$ & $0^o$ & -7.4 & 36.4 & -8.32 & $4.90\times10^{29}$\\
& $30^o$ & -6.2 & 36.0 & -7.21 \\
& $60^o$ & -3.8 & 34.4 & -4.16 \\
\hline
[Ne III] $15.55 \mu m$ & $0^o$ & -6.7 & 12.2 & -9.48 & $4.70\times10^{35}$ \\
& $30^o$ & -5.9 & 11.2 & -8.24 \\
& $60^o$ & -2.9 & 10.2 & -4.77 \\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\caption{Peaks, FWHMs and flux weighted central velocities(FWCV) of lines at different angles in model B and C.\label{tab_modb} \label{tab_modcde}}
\end{table}
\subsubsection{Stellar Motion in the Bow Shock}
\label{sect:stellar motion}
The difference among model A, D, and E is the stellar velocity with respect to the ambient molecular clouds ($v_\ast=10,~15~\textrm{and}~5~km~s^{-1}$).
The line profiles are plotted in Figure \ref{fig_modfg}. The peak locations and the FWHMs are shown in the Table \ref{tab modfg}. We find that the line profiles are more biased towards the red-shifted side with the increasing stellar velocity. The peak locations and the FWCVs of the three line profiles in model D are all red-shifted. On the contrary, these values in model E are all blue-shifted. This is because the proportion of ionized gas with a red-shifted velocity is the highest in model D and is the lowest in model E. As in model A, the red-shifted materials are mainly in the boundary region and the head region. In model D, the [Ne II] line profile is also consist of the components from the red-shifted region and from the blue-shifted region. But this is not obvious in the profiles of the [Ne III] and the $H30\alpha$ line due to the different relative fraction of $Ne^{2+}$ and $H^+$ and the large broadening of $H^+$. In model E, because the proportion and the velocities of red-shifted ionized gas are both low, the contribution to the red-shifted part of the [Ne II] line profile is small as well. In our results of the simulations, the size of the H II region decreases with the increasing stellar velocity. A shorter distance due to the smaller size causes the flux of the ionizing photons to be stronger so that the ionization rate from $Ne^+$ to $Ne^{2+}$ rises. But the density of electrons could be higher and increase the recombination rate of $Ne^{2+}$ ions. The comparison of the line luminosities of the [Ne II] line and the [Ne III] line shows that higher stellar velocity causes lower ratio of the [Ne II] line luminosity to the [Ne III] line luminosity. This suggests that the increase of the ionization rate from $Ne^+$ to $Ne^{2+}$ is more than that of the recombination rate.
In bow shock models, the ionized gas compresses the neutral and cold materials ahead of the moving star into a dense shell while the density of the ionized gas in H II region is much lower than the density of the shell. When the evolution reaches quasi-steady state, the ionization front and the shock front are motionless relative to the star. Along the arched shell from the apex to the tail, the axial velocity of the neutral gas decreases from the stellar velocity to zero. In the ionized region, the gases just peeled from the shell by the ionization are dense ($\sim 10000~cm^{-3}$) and have a velocity slightly less than the velocity of nearby neutral gases in the shell. With the expansion and moving to the tail of the H II region, the densities of the ionized gases gradually decrease to lower values ($\sim 50~cm^{-3}$). This leads to a pressure gradient from the head to the tail as in a champagne flow model. Although the ionized gases ahead of the star are accelerated by the stellar wind, the advection in the head region pushes these gases to the sides where the pressure gradient is dominant. So if the stellar velocity are higher, it need more time for the pressure gradient to accelerate the ionized gas from shell toward the blue-shifted direction, so that the proportion of the red-shifted ionized gas in the H II region will be higher. In model E, the effect of the pressure gradient is dominant in the H II region due to the low stellar velocity. Hence, the line profiles for model E in Figure \ref{fig_modfg} are more biased to the left side than those in model A and model D. And the peak locations and the FWCVs in model E are not easily distinguished from those in model C.
\begin{figure}[!htp]
\centering
\includegraphics[scale=.33]{figmod15kl1.eps}
\includegraphics[scale=.33]{figmod15kl2.eps}
\includegraphics[scale=.33]{figmod15kl3.eps}
\includegraphics[scale=.33]{figmod5kl1.eps}
\includegraphics[scale=.33]{figmod5kl2.eps}
\includegraphics[scale=.33]{figmod5kl3.eps}
\caption{Same as Figure\ref{fig_moda}, but for model D(top panels) and model E(bottom panels). There are the profiles of the [Ne II] $12.81 \mu m$ line (left panels), the $H30\alpha$ line (middle panels) and the [Ne III] $15.55 \mu m$ line (right panels) from the cometary H II regions in model A for three inclination angles ($0^0,~30^0,~60^0$).}
\begin{flushleft}
\end{flushleft}
\label{fig_modfg}
\end{figure}
\begin{table}[!htp]\footnotesize
\centering
\begin{tabular}{l|llll|l}
\hline
Model D $v_\ast=15km~s^{-1}$ \\
\hline
Line & Inclination & Peak & FWHM & FWCV & Luminosity \\
& & ($km~s^{-1}$) & ($km~s^{-1}$) & ($km~s^{-1}$) & ($erg~s^{-1}$) \\
\hline
[Ne II] $12.81 \mu m$ & $0^o$ & 4.1 & 25.2 & 0.73 & $7.79\times10^{35}$ \\
& $30^o$ & 3.5 & 19.2 & 0.63 \\
& $60^o$ & 2.7 & 13.6 & 0.36 \\
\hline
$H30\alpha$ & $0^o$ & 5.8 & 36.4 & 1.14 & $1.18\times10^{30}$ \\
& $30^o$ & 3.8 & 35.6 & 0.98 \\
& $60^o$ & 1.0 & 34.4 & 0.57 \\
\hline
[Ne III] $15.55 \mu m$ & $0^o$ & 3.9 & 18.8 & 1.26 & $1.14\times10^{36}$ \\
& $30^o$ & 3.5 & 16.4 & 1.08 \\
& $60^o$ & 2.7 & 13.4 & 0.62 \\
\hline
Model E $v_\ast=5km~s^{-1}$ \\
\hline
Line & Inclination & Peak & FWHM & FWCV & Luminosity \\
& & ($km~s^{-1}$) & ($km~s^{-1}$) & ($km~s^{-1}$) & ($erg~s^{-1}$) \\
\hline
[Ne II] $12.81 \mu m$ & $0^o$ & -1.9 & 13.2 & -5.49 & $8.24\times10^{35}$\\
& $30^o$ & -1.9 & 12.6 & -4.80 \\
& $60^o$ & -1.3 & 10.6 & -2.80 \\
\hline
$H30\alpha$ & $0^o$ & -3.8 & 36.4 & -5.09 & $9.54\times10^{29}$ \\
& $30^o$ & -3.4 & 36.0 & -4.41 \\
& $60^o$ & -2.2 & 34.4 & -2.55 \\
\hline
[Ne III] $15.55 \mu m$ & $0^o$ & -2.3 & 11.4 & -4.78 & $8.09\times10^{35}$ \\
& $30^o$ & -1.9 & 11.2 & -4.17 \\
& $60^o$ & -1.3 & 10.4 & -2.43 \\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\caption{Peaks, FWHMs and flux weighted central velocities (FWCV) of lines in model D and E.\label{tab modfg}}
\end{table}
\subsubsection{the Mass of the star}
We assume a less massive star ($M_*=21.9~M_\odot$) in model F and G. This leads to a low effective temperature $35000K$, a weak stellar wind and a weak radiation (See Table\ref{tab_modc}). The other parameters in model F and model G are kept same as in model B and model A, respectively.
In model F, because of the weaker stellar wind and ionizing radiation, the size of the H II region is also smaller than in model B. The lower effective temperature causes the relative fraction of $Ne^+$ ions to be higher. For example, in the tail, $X(Ne^+)$ is generally higher than $0.6$ in model F but lower than $0.3$ in model B.
The H II region can also be divided into the boundary region and the rest region. For the [Ne II] line, the proportion of the photons emitted from the boundary region is lower than in model B. This is due to the higher relative fraction of $Ne^{+}$ in the inner part of the H II region and causes the lower normalized flux at the velocities close to $0$ in the [Ne II] line profile. The other two line profiles in model F are similar to those in model B.
In Table \ref{tab_modhi}, the properties of the line profiles are shown. The FWCVs in model F are more blue-shifted than the corresponding values in model B. This is related with the higher relative fraction of $Ne^+$ in the inner part and the lower fluxes emitted from the boundary region where the velocities close to zero. In addition, the low effective temperature and the ionization radiation of the star lead to similar distributions of $Ne^+$ and $Ne^{2+}$ ions in the H II region so that the FWCVs of the [Ne II] line, the $H30\alpha$ line and the [Ne III] line are closer to each others in model F than in model B. Because of the high relative fraction of $Ne^+$, the line luminosity of the [Ne II] line is higher than that of the [Ne III] line in model F.
The weaker EUV flux and the weaker ram-pressure of the stellar wind in model G result in a smaller H II region and result in a smaller mass ratio between the head region and the entire H II region than in model A ($0.11/0.15$ in model G/A). The proportion of the red-shifted ionized gas is also lower than in model A ($0.13/0.18$ in model G/A). The lower effective temperature leads to a higher relative fraction of $Ne^+$ ions in the H II region as in model F.
The peak locations, line luminosities and the flux weighted central velocities in model G are also presented in Table \ref{tab_modhi}. The values of the FWCVs of the three lines are close to each others for every inclination as in model F. But it is only a coincidence that the FWCVs of the [Ne II] line are approximately equal to those of the [Ne III] line. The FWCVs in model G are all more blue-shifted than the corresponding values in model A. This is attributed to the lower proportion of the red-shifted ionized gas mentioned above. It is also obvious that the line luminosity of the [Ne II] line presented is much stronger than that of the [Ne III] line in model G due to the low effective temperature
\begin{figure}[!htp]
\centering
\includegraphics[scale=.33]{figmodhl1.eps}
\includegraphics[scale=.33]{figmodhl2.eps}
\includegraphics[scale=.33]{figmodhl3.eps}
\includegraphics[scale=.33]{figmodil1.eps}
\includegraphics[scale=.33]{figmodil2.eps}
\includegraphics[scale=.33]{figmodil3.eps}
\caption{There are the profiles of the [Ne II] $12.81 \mu m$ line (left panels), the $H30\alpha$ line (middle panels) and the [Ne III] $15.55 \mu m$ line (right panels) from the cometary H II regions for model F (top panels) and model G (bottom panels).}
\begin{flushleft}
\end{flushleft}
\label{fig_modhi}
\end{figure}
\begin{table}[!htp]\footnotesize
\centering
\begin{tabular}{l|llll|l}
\hline
model F $M_\ast=21.9M_\odot~H=0.05pc$ \\
\hline
Line & Inclination & Peak & FWHM & FWCV & Luminosity \\
& & ($km~s^{-1}$) & ($km~s^{-1}$) & ($km~s^{-1}$) & ($erg~s^{-1}$) \\
\hline
[Ne II] $12.81 \mu m$ & $0^o$ & -9.3 & 17.0 & -10.48 & $6.07\times10^{34}$ \\
& $30^o$ & -7.7 & 15.2 & -9.10 \\
& $60^o$ & -2.5 & 11.6 & -5.27 \\
\hline
$H30\alpha$ & $0^o$ & -10.2 & 37.2 & -11.01 & $5.59\times10^{28}$ \\
& $30^o$ & -8.6 & 36.4 & -9.54 \\
& $60^o$ & -5.0 & 35.2 & -5.51 \\
\hline
[Ne III] $15.55 \mu m$ & $0^o$ & -8.5 & 12.6 & -11.33 & $3.36\times10^{34}$ \\
& $30^o$ & -7.1 & 12.4 & -9.86 \\
& $60^o$ & -3.1 & 11.2 & -5.73 \\
\hline
model G $M_\ast=21.9M_\odot~v_\ast=10km~s^{-1}$ \\
\hline
Line & Inclination & Peak & FWHM & FWCV & Luminosity \\
& & ($km~s^{-1}$) & ($km~s^{-1}$) & ($km~s^{-1}$) & ($erg~s^{-1}$) \\
\hline
[Ne II] $12.81 \mu m$ & $0^o$ & 4.3 & 21.0 & -3.82 & $2.92\times10^{35}$ \\
& $30^o$ & 2.3 & 18.4 & -3.34 \\
& $60^o$ & 0.5 & 12.8 & -1.93 \\
\hline
$H30\alpha$ & $0^o$ & -1.4 & 38.8 & -3.59 & $2.25\times10^{29}$ \\
& $30^o$ & -1.4 & 37.6 & -3.11 \\
& $60^o$ & -1.0 & 35.2 & -1.80 \\
\hline
[Ne III] $15.55 \mu m$ & $0^o$ & 0.1 & 18.4 & -3.82 & $9.46\times10^{34}$ \\
& $30^o$ & 0.7 & 16.8 & -3.34 \\
& $60^o$ & 0.3 & 13.6 & -1.94 \\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\caption{Details of the line profiles in model F and model G.\label{tab_modhi}}
\end{table}
\subsection{Line Profiles Computed by Using a Slit}
We have calculated four bow shock models, but only the FWCVs and the peak locations in model D with a high stellar velocity are all red-shifted. Most of the FWCVs and part of the peak locations are blue-shifted because the velocities in the low-density and large-volume inner part of the H II region are always blue-shifted. As is mentioned in \S \ref{sect:stellar motion}, the ionized gas just ionized from the apex of the ached shell has a similar velocity to the stellar velocity and is dense. So if we compute the line profiles from a slit along the symmetrical axis of the projected 2D image rather than from the whole H II region, the influence of the dense gases in the head of the H II region will be highlighted while the emission from the low-density region will be weakened. The method is applied for all the models, and the profiles of the [Ne II] line are presented in Figure \ref{fig_modslab}. The peak locations of the profiles of the [Ne II] line and the $H30\alpha$ line are shown in Table \ref{tab_modslab}.
For the [Ne II] line, the profiles are all single-peaked. In bow shock models (model A, D, E and G), the peak locations are slightly less than $cos(\theta)v_*$. In champagne flow models (model B, C and F), it is different that the peak locations of the [Ne II] line profiles are close to zero. The red-shifted peak locations in model C suggest that the propagation velocity of the ionization front in model C is a little faster than in other champagne flow models at the age of $160,000~yr$. For the $H30\alpha$ line, because of the large thermal broadening, the relation of the peak locations to the stellar velocities in bow shock models is less explicit. But, the champagne flow models are easily distinguished from the bow shock models due to the red-shifted peak locations in bow shock models and the blue-shifted values in champagne flow models.
When comparing the FWCVs presented in Table \ref{tab_modslab}, we find that the FWCVs in champagne flow models are all blue-shifted. In bow shock models, the FWCVs are obviously red-shifted when the stellar velocity is high. But, the FWCVs in model E are slightly blue-shifted due to the low stellar velocity ($v_*=5~km~s^{-1}$). And it suggests that the FWCVs in a bow shock model with a stellar velocity lower than $5~km~s^{-1}$ are not easily distinguished from the corresponding values in champagne flow models.
\begin{figure}[!htp]
\centering
\includegraphics[scale=.24]{figmodal4.eps}
\includegraphics[scale=.24]{figmoddl4.eps}
\includegraphics[scale=.24]{figmodel4.eps}
\includegraphics[scale=.24]{figmodgl4.eps}
\includegraphics[scale=.24]{figmodbl4.eps}
\includegraphics[scale=.24]{figmodcl4.eps}
\includegraphics[scale=.24]{figmodfl4.eps}
\caption{There are the profiles of the [Ne II] $12.81\mu m$ line from the slit along the symmetrical axis of the projected 2D image of the models for three inclinations. The top panels are plotted for the bow shock models, and the bottom panels are for the champagne flow models.}
\begin{flushleft}
\end{flushleft}
\label{fig_modslab}
\end{figure}
\begin{table}[!htp]\footnotesize
\centering
\begin{tabular}{l|lll|lll}
\hline
Peak($km~s^{-1}$) & [Ne II] & $12.81\mu m$ & & $H30\alpha$ & & \\
\hline
Inclination & $0^o$ & $30^o$ & $60^o$ & $0^o$ & $30^o$ & $60^o$ \\
\hline
Model A & 8.6 & 7.0 & 3.1 & 7.8 & 6.6 & 3.8 \\
Model B & -0.1 & -0.2 & -0.5 & -2.6 & -2.2 & -1.4 \\
Model C & 1.4 & 0.3 & 0.3 & -1.4 & -1.4 & -0.6 \\
Model D & 12.6 & 12.0 & 7.0 & 8.6 & 7.4 & 4.2 \\
Model E & 4.8 & 4.1 & 2.0 & 2.6 & 2.2 & 1.0 \\
Model F & -0.9 & -1.2 & -1.1 & -3.0 & -2.6 & -1.4 \\
Model G & 8.5 & 7.4 & 4.2 & 7.4 & 6.2 & 3.4 \\
\hline
FWCV($km~s^{-1}$) & [Ne II] & $12.81\mu m$ & & $H30\alpha$ & & \\
\hline
Inclination & $0^o$ & $30^o$ & $60^o$ & $0^o$ & $30^o$ & $60^o$ \\
\hline
Model A & 4.18 & 3.50 & 2.07 & 4.92 & 4.26 & 2.46 \\
Model B & -3.82 & -3.24 & -1.77 & -4.95 & -4.29 & -2.47 \\
Model C & -2.42 & -2.09 & -1.24 & -4.29 & -3.72 & -2.15 \\
Model D & 7.27 & 6.46 & 3.86 & 6.14 & 5.32 & 3.07 \\
Model E & -0.12 & -0.30 & -0.57 & -1.00 & -0.86 & -0.50 \\
Model F & -5.38 & -4.60 & -2.60 & -5.70 & -4.94 & -2.85 \\
Model G & 6.08 & 5.18 & 2.89 & 5.16 & 4.47 & 2.58 \\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\caption{The peak locations and the flux weighted central velocities of the [Ne II] $12.81\mu m$ line and the $H30\alpha$ line from the slit along the symmetrical axis of the projected 2D image.\label{tab_modslab}}
\end{table}
\subsection{the Flux Weighted Central Velocities}
\label{sect:FWCV}
As is mentioned in \S \ref{sect:model B}, the number density is $n \approx n_e \ll n_{cr}$. And in our calculation, the temperature is always close to the equilibrium temperature in photoionized region. So if we assumed $T\approx10000K$ in photoionized region, the flux of the [Ne II] and the [Ne III] line from a unit volume is approximately as follow:
\begin{equation}
f_{ul}(i)=\begin{cases}
b_kN_kA_{ul}h\nu_{ul} & for~H30\alpha,~k=30,~i=0 \\
Ab_{Ne}X(Ne^+)(n_e^2/(2n_{cr}))A_{ul}h\nu_{ul} & for~\textrm{[Ne II]},~i=1 \\
Ab_{Ne}X(Ne^{2+})(5n_e^2/(3n_{cr1}))A_{ul}h\nu_{ul} & for~\textrm{[Ne III]},~i=2
\end{cases}~~~~.
\label{equ_ful}
\end{equation}
Since the neon atoms are almost all ionized in the H II region, we can get the relation that $X(Ne^+)+X(Ne^{2+})=1$. Other parameters in Eq. (\ref{equ_ful}) are constant due to the constant temperature in photoionized region. Hence, the fluxes from a unit volume of the three lines are all proportional to $n_e^2$. Then we can obtain the following relation:
\begin{equation}
(\frac{L(1)}{1.302\times10^{-21}}\bar{v}(1)+\frac{L(2)}{1.162\times10^{-21}}\bar{v}(2))/(\frac{L(1)}{1.302\times10^{-21}}+\frac{L(2)}{1.162\times10^{-21}})=\bar{v}(0)~~,
\end{equation}
where $L(1)$ and $L(2)$ are the line luminosities of the [Ne II] line and the [Ne III] line, respectively. $\bar{v}(0)$, $\bar{v}(1)$ and $\bar{v}(2)$ are the FWCVs of the profiles of the $H30\alpha$ line, the [Ne II] line and the [Ne III] line, respectively. If the abundance of neon has been obtained, we can approximately compute the line luminosity and the FWCVs of the [Ne III] line from those of the other two lines:
\begin{equation}
L(2)=(L(0)-\frac{L(1)}{1.801\times10^{10}Ab_{Ne}})\times1.608\times10^{10}Ab_{Ne}~~~~,
\label{equ_lim}
\end{equation}
\begin{equation}
\bar{v}(2)=[\bar{v}(0)(\frac{L(1)}{1.302\times10^{-21}}\bar{v}(1)+\frac{L(2)}{1.162\times10^{-21}}\bar{v}(2))-\frac{L(1)}{1.302\times10^{-21}}\bar{v}(1)]\frac{1.162\times10^{-21}}{L(2)}~~~~,
\label{equ_fwcv}
\end{equation}
where $L(0)$ is the line luminosity of the $H30\alpha$ line. The [Ne III] line is not detectable from the ground, but the [Ne II] line and the $H30\alpha$ line can be observed with the ground based telescopes. These equations could be useful since the difference in the [Ne III] line between the bow shock models and the champagne flow models is the most obvious among the three lines. For observing the [Ne III] line, a typical resolution ($\lambda/\Delta\lambda=30,000$) is needed to resolve the difference in the [Ne III] line profiles. The line also needs to be observed by using space telescopes since it can not be observed from the ground. In our models, the average deviation of the approximate values computed with the Eq. (\ref{equ_lim}) and (\ref{equ_fwcv}) from the accurate values is 6\%.
\section{Conclusions}
When considering the gas kinematics of compact H II region models, people generally predict that the line emission from the ionized region may be red-shifted along the line of sight for a bow shock and blue-shifted for a champagne flow when looking into the regions from the tail. Our simulation proves that this envision is generally true, but it is violated in the case of low/medium stellar speed bow shock. When the stellar velocity is lower than $5~km~s^{-1}$, it is difficult to distinguish the bow shock from a champagne flow. On the contrary, A bow shock is very easily distinguished from champagne flows if the stellar velocity is higher than $10~km~s^{-1}$.
In this paper, we have simulated the evolution of the cometary H II region by bow shock models and champagne flow models, and have displayed the density distribution and velocity fields in bow shock models and champagne flow models. We have studied the [Ne II] $12.81\mu m$ line, the $H30\alpha$ line and the [Ne III] $15.55\mu m$ line profiles from these models. We make comparisons of the line profiles in bow shock models and champagne flow models. We find that:
1. After the champagne models reach quasi-steady state, the line profiles are all biased towards the blue-shifted side and have obviously blue-shifted peak locations and flux weighted central velocities. The peak locations and the flux weighted central velocities of the [Ne II] line profiles are the least blue-shifted in the three lines meanwhile those of the [Ne III] line profiles are the most blue-shifted in champagne flow models. In our champagne flow models, when the inclination angle is no more than $60^o$, the flux weighted central velocities are lower than $-3.0~km~s^{-1}$ for the [Ne II] line, are lower than $-4.0~km~s^{-1}$ for the $H30\alpha$ line and are lower than $-4.5~km~s^{-1}$ for the [Ne III] line.
2. For bow shock models, We find that the line profiles become more biased towards the red-shifted side with increasing stellar velocity. Except for the model D with a star of $v_\ast=5~km~s^{-1}$, in the bow shock models computed in this paper, the flux weighted central velocities are higher than $-3.82~km~s^{-1}$ for the [Ne II] line and the [Ne III] line, and are higher than $-3.6~km~s^{-1}$ for the $H30\alpha$ line.
3. The peak locations of the [Ne II] line profiles from the slits along the symmetrical axis of the projected 2D image are slightly less than $cos(\theta)v_\ast$ in bow shock models and no more than $1.5~km~s^{-1}$ in champagne flow models. The peak locations of the $H30\alpha$ line profiles from the slits are less red-shifted or more blue-shifted than those of the [Ne II] line.
We have shown the profiles of the [Ne II] line at $12.81 \mu m$, the $H30\alpha$ recombination line and the [Ne III] line at $15.55 \mu m$ in this paper. These results are useful to recognizing the causes of the cometary H II region.
\normalem
\begin{acknowledgements}
The work is partially funded by National Basic Research Program of China (973 program) No. 2012CB821805. The authors are also grateful to the supports by Doctoral Fund of Ministry of Education of China No. 20113402120018 and Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province of China No. 1408085MA13. F.-Y. Zhu is thankful to Dr. X.-L. Deng for generous financial aids during the visit to Beijing Computational Science Research Center and suggestions on the hydrodynamical computation methods. F.-Y. Zhu would also thank Dr. J.-X. Wang for financial supports.
\end{acknowledgements}
\bibliographystyle{raa}
|
\section{Introduction}
\input{tex/introduction}
\section{Related Work}
\input{tex/related}
\input{tex/local}
\input{tex/global}
\section{Model Inference}
\input{tex/inference}
\section{Experiments}
\input{tex/experiment}
\section{Conclusion}
\input{tex/conclusion}
\bibliographystyle{ieee}
\small
\subsection{3D Shape Model}\label{sec:global}
We start our description by explaining how we would estimate the pose and shape of an object if 2D part - 3D landmark correspondences were known. We represent a 3D object model as a linear combination of a few basis shapes to constrain the shape variability. This assumption has been widely used in various shape-related problems such as object segmentation \cite{cootes1995active}, single image-based shape recovery \cite{gu20063d} and nonrigid structure from motion \cite{bregler2000recovering}. We use a weak-perspective model, which is a good approximation when the depth of the object is smaller than the distance from the camera. With these two assumptions, the 2D part locations $P\in\RR{2}{p}$ can be described by
\begin{align}\label{eq:shape1}
P = R\sum_{i=1}^{k} c_iB_i + {\mathbf{t}}{\mathbf{1}}^T,
\end{align}
where $B_i\in\RR{3}{p}$ denotes the $i$-th basis shape, $R\in\RR{2}{3}$ represents the first two rows of a rotation matrix, and ${\mathbf{t}}\in\R{2}$ is the translation vector. In model inference, we try to minimize the geometric reprojection error to find the optimal parameters.
However, the model in \refEq{eq:shape1} is bilinear in $R$ and $c_i$s yielding a nonconvex problem. In order to have a linear representation, we use the shape model proposed in \cite{zhou20143d}, which assumes that there is a rotation for each basis shape. The 3D shape model is $S=\sum_{i=1}^{k}c_iR_iB_i$, and the 2D part locations are given by
\begin{align}\label{eq:shape2}
P = \sum_{i=1}^{k} T_iB_i + {\mathbf{t}}{\mathbf{1}}^T,
\end{align}
where $T_i\in\RR{2}{3}$ corresponds to the first two rows of $R_i$ multiplied by $c_i$. In order to enforce $T_i$ to be orthogonal, the spectral norms of $T_i$s are minimized during model inference. The spectral norm is the largest singular value of a matrix, and minimizing it enforces the two singular values to be equal, which yields an orthogonal matrix \cite{zhou20143d}. After $T_i$s are estimated, $c_i$s and $R_i$s are derived from $T_i$s and the shape is reconstructed by $S=\sum_{i=1}^{k}c_iR_iB_i$. Note that the reconstructed shape is in the camera frame, and we compute a single rotation matrix $R$ by aligning the reconstructed shape to the canonical pose.
\subsection{Objective Function}\label{sec:obj}
We try to locate a part by finding its correspondence in a set of hypotheses given by the trained detector. The cost without geometric constraints is
\begin{align}
f_{score}({\mathbf{x}}_1,\cdots,{\mathbf{x}}_p) = - \sum_{j=1}^{p} {\mathbf{r}}_j^T{\mathbf{x}}_j,
\end{align}
where ${\mathbf{x}}_j\in\{0,1\}^l$ is the selection vector and ${\mathbf{r}}_j\in\R{l}$ is the vector of the detection scores for all hypotheses for the $j$-th part.
Geometric consistency is imposed by minimizing the following reprojection error:
\begin{align}
&f_{geom}({\mathbf{x}}_1,\cdots,{\mathbf{x}}_p,T_1,\cdots,T_k,{\mathbf{t}}) = \nonumber\\
&\frac{1}{2}~ \sum_{j=1}^{p} \left\| D_j^{-\frac{1}{2}}\left(L_j^T{\mathbf{x}}_j - \left[\sum_{i=1}^{k} T_iB_i\right]_j -{\mathbf{t}} \right) \right\|^2,
\end{align}
where we concatenate the 2D locations of hypotheses for part $j$ in $L_j\in\RR{l}{2}$ and denote the covariance estimated in training as $D_j$.
As introduced in \refSec{sec:global}, we add the following regularizer to enforce the orthogonality of $T_i$:
\begin{align}
f_{reg}(T_1,\cdots,T_k) = \sum_{i=1}^{k}\|T_i\|_2,
\end{align}
where we use $\|T_i\|_2$ to represent the spectral norm of $T_i$, i.e., the largest singular value.
To simplify the computation, we relax the binary constraint on ${\mathbf{x}}_i$ and allow it to be a soft-assignment vector ${\mathbf{x}}_i \in \mathcal{A}$, where $\mathcal{A}=\{{\mathbf{x}}\in[0.1]^l|~ \sum_{i=1}^{l}x_i=1.\}$.
Finally, the objective function reads
\begin{align}\label{eq:finalcost}
\min_{\overline{X},\overline{T},{\mathbf{t}}} ~& f_{geom}(\overline{X},\overline{T},{\mathbf{t}}) + \lambda_1 f_{score}(\overline{X}) + \lambda_2 f_{reg}(\overline{T}), \\
\mbox{s.t.~} ~~~~ & {\mathbf{x}}_j\in\mathcal{A}, ~ \forall j=1:p, \nonumber
\end{align}
where $\overline{X}$ and $\overline{T}$ represent the unions of ${\mathbf{x}}_1,\cdots,{\mathbf{x}}_p$ and $R_1,\cdots,R_k$, respectively.
After solving \refEq{eq:finalcost}, we recover the 3D shape $S$ and pose $\theta=(R,{\mathbf{t}})$ from $T_i$s, as introduced in \refSec{sec:global}.
\subsection{Optimization}
The problem in \refEq{eq:finalcost} is convex since $f_{score}$ is a linear term, $f_{geom}$ is the sum of squares of linear terms, and $f_{reg}$ is the sum of norms of unknown variables. We use the alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM) \cite{boyd2010distributed} to solve the convex problem in \refEq{eq:finalcost}. Since $f_{reg}$ is nondifferentiable, which is not straightforward to optimize, we introduce an auxiliary variable $Z$ and reformulate the problem as follows:
\begin{align}
\min_{\overline{X},\overline{T},{\mathbf{t}},\overline{Z}} ~& f_{geom}(\overline{X},\overline{T},{\mathbf{t}}) + \lambda_1 f_{score}(\overline{X}) + \lambda_2 f_{reg}(\overline{Z}), \\
\mbox{s.t.~} ~~~~ & \overline{T} = \overline{Z}, \nonumber \\
& {\mathbf{x}}_j\in\mathcal{A}, ~ \forall j=1:p. \nonumber
\end{align}
The corresponding augmented Lagrangian is:
\begin{align}\label{eq:lagragian}
\mathcal{L} &= f_{geom}(\overline{X},\overline{T},{\mathbf{t}}) + \lambda_1 f_{score}(\overline{X}) + \lambda_2 f_{reg}(\overline{Z}) \nonumber \\
&+ \left<Y,\overline{T}-\overline{Z}\right> + \frac{\rho}{2}\|\overline{T}-\overline{Z}\|_F^2.
\end{align}
The ADMM algorithm iteratively updates variables by the following steps to find the stationary point of \refEq{eq:lagragian}:
\begin{align}
{\mathbf{t}} &\leftarrow \arg\min_{{\mathbf{t}}} \mathcal{L}, \label{eq:step-t}\\
\overline{X} &\leftarrow \arg\min_{\overline{X}} \mathcal{L}, \label{eq:step-X}\\
\overline{T} &\leftarrow \arg\min_{\overline{T}} \mathcal{L}, \label{eq:step-T}\\
\overline{Z} &\leftarrow \arg\min_{\overline{Z}} \mathcal{L}, \label{eq:step-Z}\\
Y &\leftarrow \rho(\overline{T}-\overline{Z}).
\end{align}
It can be shown that \refEq{eq:step-t}, \refEq{eq:step-X} and \refEq{eq:step-T} are all quadratical programming problems, which have closed-form solution or can be solved efficiently using existing convex solvers. \refEq{eq:step-Z} is a spectral-norm regularized proximal problem, which also admits a closed-form solution \cite{zhou20143d}.
\subsection{Visibility Estimation}\label{sec:visibility}
In model inference, only visible landmarks should be considered. To estimate the unknown visibility, we adopt the following strategy. We first assume that all landmarks are visible and solve our model in \refEq{eq:finalcost} to obtain a rough estimate of the viewpoint. Since the landmark visibility of a car only depends on the aspect graph, the roughly estimated viewpoint can give us a good estimate of the landmark visibility. We observed that our model could reliably estimate the coarse view by assuming the full visibility, which might be attributed to the global optimization. After obtaining the visibility, we solve our model again by only considering the visible landmarks. The full shape can be reconstructed by the linear combination of full meshes of basis shapes after the coefficients are estimated.
\subsection{Successive Refinement}\label{sec:prune}
The relaxation of binary selection vectors ${\mathbf{x}}_j$s in \refEq{eq:finalcost} may yield inaccurate localization, since it allows the landmark to be located inside the convex hull of the hypotheses. To improve the precision, we apply the following scheme: we solve our model in \refEq{eq:finalcost} repeatedly, and in each iteration we define a trust region based on the previous result for each landmark and merely keep the hypotheses inside the trust region as the input to fit the model again. We use three iterations. We can start from a large trust region to achieve global fitting and gradually decrease the trust region size in each iteration to reject outliers and improve localization. This successive refinement scheme has been widely-used for feature matching \cite{li2011optimal,jiang2011linear}.
We summarize the inference process in Algorithm \ref{alg:inference}.
\begin{algorithm}\small
\textbf{Input:} 2D hypotheses for parts $\{\mathcal{H}_i=(L_i,{\mathbf{r}}_i)|~i=1:m\}$ \\
3D basis shapes $\{B_i|~i=1:k\}$ and mean shape $B_0$\\
\textbf{Output:} Estimated pose $\theta=(R,{\mathbf{t}})$ and shape $S$\\
\tcc{$optimize(\{\mathcal{H}_i\},\{B_i\})$ means solving \refEq{eq:finalcost} with hypotheses $\{\mathcal{H}_i\}$ and basis shapes $\{B_i\}$ to recover $\theta$ and $S$ (\refSec{sec:obj})}
\tcc{Estimate visibility (\refSec{sec:visibility})}
$\theta,S ~ \leftarrow ~ optimize(\{\mathcal{\mathcal{H}}_i|~i=1:m\},B_0)$\;
$V ~ \leftarrow ~ visibility(\theta)$\;
\tcc{Prune hypotheses (\refSec{sec:prune})}
$\theta,S ~ \leftarrow ~ optimize(\{\mathcal{H}_i~i\in V\},B_0)$\;
$\tilde{\mathcal{H}}_i ~ \leftarrow ~ pruning(\mathcal{H}_i,S_i),\forall i\in V$\;
\tcc{Refine pose \& shape with shape space}
Update $\theta,S ~ \leftarrow ~ optimize(\{\tilde{\mathcal{H}}_i|~i\in V\},\{B_i,|~i=1:k\})$\;
\caption{Outline of the inference process}
\label{alg:inference}
\end{algorithm}
\section{Shape Constrained Discriminative Parts}{\label{sec:discriminate}}
Our proposed method models both 2D appearance variation and 3D shape deformation of an object class. The 2D appearance is modeled as a collection of discriminatively trained parts. Each part is associated with a 3D landmark point on a deformable 3D shape.
Unlike the previous works that manually define landmarks on the shape model, we propose an \textit{automatic} selection scheme: we first learn the appearance models for all points on the 3D model, evaluate their detection performance, and select a subset of them as our part models based on their detection performance in 2D and the spatial coverage in 3D.
\subsection{Learning Discriminative Parts}
One of the main challenges in object pose estimation rises from the fact that due to perspective transform and self occlusions, even the same 3D position of an object has very different 2D appearances in the image observed from different viewpoints. We tackle this problem by learning a mixture of discriminative part models for each point in the 3D model to capture the variety in appearance.
Given a training set $D$, each training image $I_i \in D$ is associated with the 3D points of the object shape $S \in \mathbb{R}^{3 \times p}$, their 2D projections $L_i \in \mathbb{R}^{2 \times p}$ annotated in the image, and their visibility $V_i \in \{0,1\}^p$.
For each visible 3D point $j \in \{1, \dots, p\}$, in training image $I_i$, we extract an $N \times N$ image patch centered at its 2D location $L_{ij}$ as positive example, assuming all the images are resized such that the object is approximately at the same scale. Negative examples are randomly extracted patches that do not have overlap with the object.
We bootstrap the learning of a discriminative mixture model for each part via clustering. Recent work \cite{hariharan2012discriminative,Singh2012DiscPat} has shown that whitened HOG (WHO) achieves better clustering results than HOG \cite{dalal2005histograms}. Denote $\phi(L_{ij})$ as the HOG feature of the positive image patch centered at $L_{ij}$ and $\overline{\phi}_\textbf{bg}$ as the mean of background HOG features. We compute the WHO feature as $\Sigma^{-1/2}(\phi(L_{ij}) - \overline{\phi}_\textbf{bg})$, where $\Sigma$ is the shared covariance matrix computed from all positive and negative features. Then we cluster the WHO features of each part $j$ into $m$ clusters using K-means as the initialization of the mixture model.
A linear classifier $W_{cj}$ is trained for each cluster $c$ of a part $j$. We apply linear discriminant analysis due to efficiency in training and limited loss in detection accuracy \cite{hariharan2012discriminative,girshick2013training},
\begin{align}\label{eq:lda}
W_{cj} = \Sigma^{-1}\left(\overline{\phi}(L_{ij};z_{ij} = c) - \overline{\phi}_\textbf{bg}\right),
\end{align}
where $z_{ij} \in \{1,\dots,m\}$ is the cluster assignment for each feature, and $\overline{\phi}(L_{ij};z_{ij} = c)$ is the mean feature over all $L_{ij}$ of cluster $c$. Let $\mathbf{x} = (x,y)$ be the position $(x,y)$ in the image. The response of part $j$ at a given location $\mathbf{x}$ is the max response over all its $c$ components: $score_j(\mathbf{x}) = \max_c \{W_{cj} \cdot \phi(\mathbf{x})\}$.
Due to intra-class variation and viewpoint differences, the appearance of training patches may not be perfectly aligned. Such misalignment results in inferior detector performance. We introduce a latent variable for each training patch, $r_{ij} \in \mathbb{R}^2$ to represent the relative center location to the annotated landmark location $L_{ij}$. To improve the classifier, we use the classifiers learned from (\ref{eq:lda}) to reposition the patch center in the neighborhood $\Delta(L_{ij})$ of $L_{ij}$ and update $z_{ij}$ and $r_{ij}$ as
\begin{align*}
\mathbf{x}^*_{ij} =&\; \text{argmax}_{\mathbf{x} \in \Delta(L_{ij})} score_j(\mathbf{x}),\\
z_{ij} =&\; \text{argmax}_{c} \{W_{cj} \cdot \phi(\mathbf{x}^*_{ij})\},\\
r_{ij} =&\; \mathbf{x}^*_{ij} - L_{ij}.
\end{align*}
The classifier weights are then retrained as
\begin{align}
\widehat{W}_{cj} = \Sigma^{-1}\left(\overline{\phi}(L_{ij}+r_{ij};z_{ij} = c) - \overline{\phi}_{\textbf{bg}}\right),
\end{align}
where $\overline{\phi}(L_{ij}+r_{ij};z_{ij} = c)$ is the mean feature over aligned patches of cluster $c$. Note that the latent update procedure is similar to that of DPM \cite{felzenszwalb2010object} with the difference that we do not apply generalized distance transform to filter responses but only consider maximum responses within a local region. The reason is that our model, as will be discussed in Section \ref{sec:global}, is constrained by the 3D shape space instead of learned 2D deformations. We want, thus, to obtain accurate part localization to estimate the object pose and shape.
Figure \ref{fig:latent} shows an example comparison of the mean image patch and the filter learned from clustering and after several iterations of latent update.
With the latent update step, the image patches of the training set become better aligned resulting in more concentrated weights in the learned filter. After the latent update, each patch mixture is retrained by hard negative mining and linear SVM as in \cite{felzenszwalb2010object} to boost detection accuracy.
A $2 \times 2$ covariance matrix $D_j$ is estimated for each landmark $j$ from latent variables $r_{ij}$, to model the uncertainty of the detected landmark position $\mathbf{x}^*_{ij}$ relative to the ground truth.
\begin{figure}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=.6\linewidth]{figures/patch.jpg}
\caption{The mean training patches and the positive weights of the learned filter for a (view) component of a part on the car wheel are shown. Filter learning is bootstrapped by clustering. The top and bottom rows correspond to the results before and after the latent update, respectively. The latent update procedure updates the center position and scale for each training patch by detecting the patches in the local region of the 2D landmark, and retrain the filters using better aligned training patches. The procedure results in more concentrated weights in learned filters.}\label{fig:latent}
\end{figure}
\subsection{Selecting Discriminative Landmarks}
Seeking a compact representation of the object, we try to select only a small subset of discriminative landmarks $S_D$ among all 3D landmarks $S$. We want the selected landmarks $S_D$ to be both associated with discriminative part models and have a good spatial coverage of the object shape model in 3D. The selection problem is formulated as a \textbf{facility location problem},
\begin{align}\label{eq:facility}
\min_{y_u, x_{uv}} ~~ & \sum_u z_{u} y_{u} + \lambda \sum_{uv} d_{uv} x_{uv}, \\
\mbox{s.t.~} ~~ & \sum_v x_{uv} = 1,\notag\\
& x_{uv} \le y_v, ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ \forall u, v, \notag\\
& x_{uv}, y_u \in \{0,1\}, ~~~~~ \forall u, v, \notag
\end{align}
where the interpretations of each symbol are presented in Table \ref{table:facility}.
\begin{table}[h]
\begin{tabular}{ll}
\hline
Symbol & Interpretation \\
\hline
$z_u$ & cost of selecting landmark $u$ \\
$y_u$ & binary landmark selection variable \\
$d_{uv}$ & cost of landmark $v$ ``serving'' $u$ \\
$x_{uv}$ & binary variable for landmark $v$ ``serving'' $u$ \\
$\lambda$ & trade off between unary costs and binary costs\\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\caption{Notations interpretation in \refEq{eq:facility}}\label{table:facility}
\end{table}
The cost $z_u$ for a landmark $u$ should be lower if the associated part model is more discriminative. We model the discriminativeness by evaluating the Average Precision (AP) of detecting each landmark in the training set. For any landmark $u$, we perform detection with the learned part model in the training set $S$ to generate a list of location hypotheses $H_u$. A hypothesis $h \in H_u$ is considered as true positive if the ground truth location $L_{iu}$ is within a small radius $\delta$. Let the computed AP for a part $u$ be $AP_u$, we set $z_u = 1 - AP_u$. The cost of ``serving'' (or suppressing) other landmarks are set to be the euclidean distance between landmarks in 3D, i.e., $d_{uv} = ||S_u - S_v||_2$. The value of $\lambda$ is set to 1 in our experiments.
The minimization problem \ref{eq:facility} is a Mixed Integer Programming (MIP) problem, which is known to be NP-hard. But a good approximation solution can be obtained by relaxing the integer constrains to be $x_{uv} \in [0,1], ~ y_{u} \in [0,1]$, solving the relaxed Linear Programming problem, and thresholding the solution.
Figure \ref{fig:landmark-selection} visualizes an example result of MIP optimization for landmark selection.
\begin{figure}
\label{fig:selection}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.9\linewidth]{figures/landmark_selection_1.pdf}
\caption{Visualization of the landmark selection optimization result. All 256 landmark points of a car are shown in circle markers. The color of the markers represents the Average Precision(AP) of the landmark part detection on the training set, red means higher AP and blue means lower AP. The size of the landmark represents the selection result, the larger ones are selected via the MIP optimization and the smaller ones are not selected. The red landmarks are preferred since they have higher detection accuracy, but only a subset of red landmarks are selected because they are close in 3D.}
\label{fig:landmark-selection}
\end{figure}
\subsection{Local Appearance Model}{\label{sec:discriminate}}
Our object shape model is represented by a collection of 3D shape landmarks. During training, we learn a mixture of discriminative parts to model the 2D appearances of each landmark. In order to prune weak classifiers and reduce inference time, a subset of discriminative parts are selected based on their quality of detection in 2D and the joint coverage of the object shape model in 3D.
\subsubsection{Learning the appearance of Landmarks}
One of the main challenges in object pose estimation rises from the fact that due to perspective transform and self occlusions, even the same 3D position of an object has very different 2D appearances in the image observed from different viewpoints. We tackle this problem by learning a mixture of discriminative classifiers for each landmark to capture the variety in appearance.
Given a training set $D$, each training image $I_i \in D$ is associated with the 3D landmarks of the object $S \in \mathbb{R}^{3 \times p}$, and their 2D projections annotated in the image $L_i \in \mathbb{R}^{2 \times p}$ and visibility $V_i \in \{0,1\}^p$.
\textbf{Bootstrapping by clustering.} For each 3D landmark $k \in \{1, \dots, p\}$, in training image $I_i$, we extract an $N \times N$ image patch centered at its 2D locations $L_{ik}$ if it is visible $V_{ik} = 1$, assuming the images are resized such that the object is at the same scale. We denote the HOG feature of the patch as $\phi(L_{ik})$. The positive training features for the landmark $k$ is thus $\{\phi(L_{ik}) | V_{ik} = 1\}$. The negative training features $\phi(L_{\textbf{bg}})$ are HOG features of randomly extracted patches that does not have overlap with the object. Previous works have shown that whitened HOG achieves better clustering results. We adopt the same approach to first transform each feature vector into whitened space, termed whitened HOG (WHO):
\begin{align}
\textbf{WHO}[\phi(L_{ik})] =
\Sigma^{-1/2}(\phi(L_{ik}) - \overline{\phi(L_{\textbf{bg}}}))
\end{align}
Where $\Sigma$ is the shared covariance matrix computed from both positive and negative features and $\overline{\phi(L_{\textbf{bg}})}$ is the mean of all negative features. Then we cluster the whitened features of each landmark $k$ into $m$ clusters using K-means. Let latent variable $c_{ik} \in \{1,\dots,m\}$ be the component assignment for each feature. A filter $W_{kc}, c \in \{1,\dots,m\}$ is a linear classifier learned for each cluster $c$ of a landmark $k$, using linear discriminant analysis,
\begin{align}
W_{kc} = \Sigma^{-1}(\overline{\phi(L_{ik})} - \overline{\phi(L_{\textbf{bg}}})), \; \forall c_{ik} =&\; c
\end{align}
The discriminative model for each landmark is thus a mixture of filters with $c$ components.
\textbf{Landmark responses in the image.} Let $\mathbf{x} = (x,y,l)$ be the position $(x,y)$ in the $l$-th level (scale) of an image pyramid. The space of all locations in the image pyramid is denoted as $\mathcal{X}$. The learned filters are applied in a sliding-window fashion to each location $\mathbf{x}$ in the image pyramid. The response of the landmark $k$ at a given location $\mathbf{x} \in \mathcal{X}$ is the max response over all its $c$ components:
\begin{align}
score_k(\mathbf{x}) = \max_c \{W_{kc} \cdot \phi(\mathbf{x})\}
\end{align}
\textbf{Latent update 2D location and classifier weights.} Due to annotation and clustering error, training patches may not be perfectly aligned. Such misalignment results in inferior detector performance. We introduce another latent variables for each training patch, $r_{ik}$ for relative center location to the annotated landmark location $L_{ik}$. To train a better classifier, we use the classifiers learned from clustering WHO to reposition the patch center in the neighborhood $\Delta(L_{ik})$ of $L_{ik}$ and update $c_{ik}$ and $r_{ik}$ as
\begin{align*}
\mathbf{x}^*_{ik} =&\; \text{argmax}_{\mathbf{x} \in \Delta(L_{ik})} score_k(\mathbf{x})\\
c_{ik} =&\; \text{argmax}_{c} \{W_{kc} \cdot \phi(\mathbf{x}^*_{ik})\}\\
r_{ik} =&\; \mathbf{x}^*_{ik} - L_{ik}
\end{align*}
The classifier weights are then retrained as
\begin{align}
\widehat{W}_{kc} = \Sigma^{-1}(\overline{\phi(L_{ik}+r_{ik})} - \overline{\phi(L_{\textbf{bg}}})), \; \forall c_{ik} =&\; c
\end{align}
Each patch mixture is retrained by linear SVM and negative examples are chosen via hard negative mining as in \cite{felzenszwalb2010object}.
Figure \ref{fig:latent} shows the filter learned from clustering and after several iterations of latent update.
\begin{figure*}[!t]
\centering
\begin{subfigure}[b]{0.24\textwidth}
\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{figures/LDA_001_002.jpg}
\caption{clustering WHO}
\label{fig:cluster}
\end{subfigure}
\begin{subfigure}[b]{0.24\textwidth}
\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{figures/LDA_001_002_latent_1.jpg}
\caption{iteration 1}
\label{fig:itr1}
\end{subfigure}
\begin{subfigure}[b]{0.24\textwidth}
\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{figures/LDA_001_002_latent_2.jpg}
\caption{iteration 2}
\label{fig:itr2}
\end{subfigure}
\begin{subfigure}[b]{0.24\textwidth}
\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{figures/LDA_001_002_latent_3.jpg}
\caption{iteration 3}
\label{fig:itr3}
\end{subfigure}
\caption{The average training patches and learned filter for a component of a landmark on the car wheel after each iteration are shown. Filters learning are bootstrapped by clustering. The latent update procedure update the center position and scale for each training patch by detecting the patches in the local region of the 2D landmark, and retrain the filters using better aligned training patches. The procedure results in more concentrated weights in learned filters.}
\label{fig:latent}
\end{figure*}
\subsubsection{Discriminative Landmarks Selection}
Seeking a compact representation of the object, we try to select only a subset of discriminative landmarks $S_D$ among all 3D landmarks $S$. We want the selected landmarks $S_D$ to be both discriminative in the image and have a good spatial coverage of the object shape model in 3D. The selection problem is formulated as \textbf{facility location problem},
\begin{align}\label{eq:facility}
\min_{y_u, x_{uv}} ~~ & \sum_u c_{u} y_{u} + \lambda \sum_{uv} d_{uv} x_{uv} \\
\mbox{s.t.~} ~~ & \sum_v x_{uv} = 1,\\
& x_{uv} \le y_v, ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ \forall u, v, \\
& x_{uv}, y_u \in \{0,1\}, ~~~~~ \forall u, v.
\end{align}
where binary variable $y_u$ is 1 if landmark $u$ is selected, binary variable $x_{uv}$ is $1$ if landmark $u$ is suppressed by landmark $v$, $c_u$ is the cost of selecting landmark $u$, and $d_{uv}$ is the cost of landmark $v$ covering landmark $u$. $\lambda$ balance the ratio between unary costs and binary costs.
The cost $c_u$ for a landmark $u$ should be lower if the landmark is more discriminative. We model the discriminativeness by evaluating the Average Precision of detecting each landmark. For any landmark $u$, we preform detection in the training set $S$ to generate a list of bounding box hypothesis $B_u$, a bounding box hypothesis $b \in B_u$ is considered as true positive if the ground truth location $L_{iu}$ is covered by it. Let the computed AP for landmark $u$ be $AP_u$, we set $c_u = 1 - AP_u$. The cost of suppressing other landmarks are set to be the euclidean distance between landmarks in 3D, i.e., $d_{uv} = ||S_u - S_v||_2$.
The minimization problem \ref{eq:facility} is a Mixed Integer Programming (MIP) problem, which is known to be NP-hard. But a good approximation solution can be obtained by relaxing the integer constrains to be $x_{uv} \in [0,1], ~ y_{u} \in [0,1]$ and solve the relaxed Linear Programming problem and threshold the solution.
\begin{figure}
\label{fig:selection}
\includegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth]{figures/landmarkSelection.jpg}
\caption{Visualization of the landmark selection output. All 256 landmark of a car are shown. The color represents the Average Precision(AP) of the landmarks, red means higher AP and blue means lower AP. The size of the landmark represents the selection, the bigger ones are selected via the MIP optimization and the smaller ones are not selected.}
\end{figure}
\subsubsection{Modeling Landmarks Localization Uncertainty}
A covariance matrix $\Sigma_k$ is estimated for each landmark $k$ from latent variables $r_{ik}$, to model the uncertainty of the detected landmark position $\mathbf{x}^*_{ik}$ relative to the ground truth.
|
\section{Introduction}
Cooperation between base stations (BSs) is receiving in recent years a lot of attention, due to its potential to improve coverage and spectral efficiency. It has shown considerable benefits especially for cell edge users that suffer from inter-cell interference. It is also expected to play a significant role due to the coming densification of networks with HetNets \cite{DhillonBest12}. The concept of cooperation in the downlink implies that two or more BSs exchange user state information and data to offer a stronger beneficial signal with reduced interference. The total benefit depends on the amount of information exchanged, but also very importantly on the number and positions of nodes that take part in the cooperation.
Recent studies have approached the problem of downlink cooperation with the theory of Point Processes \cite{PPbre1981} and Stochastic Geometry \cite{BacBlaVol1}, where the network topologies follow a certain probability distribution. Often, BS positions are modelled by a Poisson Point Process (PPP) with some fixed density over the entire plane. Specifically, Baccelli and Giovanidis \cite{AGFBTWC14} have studied cooperation between pairs of BSs. Evaluation for any number of cooperating stations has been done by Nigam et al in \cite{HaenggiCo14}, Tanbourgi et al in \cite{TanbCoopJ14} and B{\l}aszczyszyn and Keeler in \cite{BlaGn14}. In all these works, the common ground is the use of PPPs and the fact that the cooperation is driven by the user, who defines the set of stations for his/her service.
However, the last assumption is not very realistic since it overburdens the backhaul/control channel with intensive communication between BSs. Furthermore, it is not very clear which user is served by which station. A simpler and more pragmatic approach is to define a-priori static groups of BSs (that do not change over time). In each group, the BSs may reliably communicate with each other by reservation of control channel bandwidth or installation of optical fibres between them.
If the criterion for grouping relates to geographic proximity, BSs in a small distance will coordinate fast and will share a planar area of common interest. The important question is how exactly should these groups be defined?
The idea is not new and suggestions have already appeared by Papadogiannis et al \cite{Papad08}, Giovanidis et al \cite{GiovaWCNC12}, Akoum and Heath \cite{AkoumHeathJournal13} and Pappas and Kountouris \cite{PapKou14}. Static clusters have also been considered for the uplink in \cite{AndrCLUST09}, \cite{VenkaPIMRCa07} and \cite{GiannCoop14}. In these works however, groups are formed neither systematically, nor optimally. Other works model the problem of dynamic clustering as a coalition game \cite{MoJoMISO14}.
We propose in our work a criterion for BS grouping that only depends on geometry. It is a variation of the Nearest Neighbour Model for point processes suggested by H\"aggstr\"om and Meester \cite{HagMeest96}. According to this, two BSs belong to the same group if one of the two is the nearest neighbour of the other. This assumption is reasonable for the telecommunication networks because it forms groups based on proximity. The variation we consider here limits the maximum number of elements $K$ that can group together. Since the general problem is very complicated, after presenting the criterion in Section \ref{SecII}, we focus on the case $K=2$, where the BSs can be either single or cooperate in pair with another BS. This is already interesting, as it raises all the important questions of the general problem. It leads to fundamental results and is very challenging to study.
In Section \ref{SecIII} we formally give the notions of single BSs and pairs and define the two point processes $\Phi^{(1)}$ and $\Phi^{(2)}$ that result from a dependent thinning of the original process $\Phi$. The total interference of the network results from the sum of the interferences of the individual processes $\Phi^{(1)}$ and $\Phi^{(2)}$. In Section \ref{SecIV} we show that these processes are not PPPs and provide many of their structural properties: the average proportion of atoms from $\Phi$ that belong to $\Phi^{(1)}$ and $\Phi^{(2)}$, the average proportion of Voronoi surface related to each of them, as well as properties concerning repulsion/attraction. We continue in Section \ref{SecV} with the interference analysis and obtain explicit expressions for the expected value of the interference created by each one of the two point processes. We also provide their Laplace Transform (LT) when they are constrained within a finite subset of $A\subset\mathbb{R}^2$. Finally, Section \ref{SecV} concludes our work. All proofs of theorems can be found in the Appendix.
\section{Organising Base Stations into Groups}
\label{SecII}
Let us consider a Poisson Point Process (PPP) $\Phi$ in $\mathbb{R}^2$ with density $\lambda>0$.
A realisation $\phi$ of the process can be described by the infinite set of (enumerated) atoms $\left\{x_i\right\}$. Each realisation represents a possible deployment of single antenna Base Stations (BSs) on the plane. We wish to organise these BSs (or atoms) into \textit{cooperative groups} $\mathcal{C}_m\left(\phi\right)$, with possibly different sizes, where size refers to group cardinality $card\left(\mathcal{C}_m\right)$. The index $m$ enumerates the formed groups. We consider groups of atoms whose union exhausts the infinite set $\phi$ and they are \textit{disjoint}
\begin{eqnarray}
\label{ClusterProp1}
\bigcup_{m=1}^{\infty} \mathcal{C}_m & = & \phi,\\
\label{ClusterProp2}
\mathcal{C}_m\cap\mathcal{C}_n & = & \emptyset,\ \ \forall m\neq n.
\end{eqnarray}
We aim to find groups that are invariable in size and elements with respect to the random parameters of the telecommunication network (e.g. fading, shadowing or user positions). In this sense, we look for a criterion that aims at \textit{network-defined, static} clusters that differ from the user-driven selection of previous works.
For this reason, we use rules that depend only on geometry. Based on these, an atom $x\in\phi$ takes part in a group, based solely on its relative distance to the rest of the atoms $\phi\setminus\left\{x\right\}$. This geometric criterion is related to the path-loss factor of the channel gain. When a user lies at a planar point $z$ and is served by BS $x$, the gain is equal to
\begin{eqnarray}
\label{channelH}
h\left(z,x\right) = \nu\left(z,x\right)d\left(z,x\right)^{-\beta}, & & z\in\mathbb{R}^2,\ x\in\phi,
\end{eqnarray}
where $d(z,x):=\left|z-x\right|$ is the Euclidean distance between the user and the BS, $d\left(z,x\right)^{\beta}$ is the path loss with exponent $\beta>2$ and $\nu\left(z,x\right)$ models the power of channel fading. Both $h$ and $\nu$ hence refer to power, while the channel fading component is a complex number equal to $\sqrt{\nu}e^{j\theta}$ (e.g. for Rayleigh fading $\nu$ is exponentially distributed).
\subsection{The Nearest Neighbour Model.}
In our work we investigate grouping decisions based on a model proposed by H\"aggstr\"om and Meester \cite{HagMeest96}, and further analysed in \cite{DaleyLast05}, \cite{DalStoSto99}, \cite{Kozakova06}, the so called \textit{Nearest Neighbour Model} (NNM). Given the realization $\phi$ we connect each atom $x$ to its geometrically \textit{Nearest Neighbour} by an undirected edge. This results in a graph $\mathcal{G}_{NN}$, which is well defined, because for a PPP no two inter-atom distances are the same a.s. and hence each atom has a unique first neighbour. However, an atom can be the nearest neighbour for a set of atoms (possibly empty).
The NNM has certain properties that make it a good candidate for our purpose. (P.1) The group formation is independent of the PPP density $\lambda$. (P.2) The graph $\mathcal{G}_{NN}$ is disconnected, i.e. there always exist two atoms not connected by any path. (P.3) Each resulting cluster $\mathcal{C}$ does not contain \textit{cycles}, it is a \textit{tree} and hence the graph $\mathcal{G}_{NN}$ is a \textit{forest}. (P.4) The graph contains a.s. no infinite component, i.e. it does not percolate \cite[Th.2.1 and Th.5.2]{HagMeest96}. Consequently, the cardinality of each cluster is a.s. finite. (P.5) All atoms necessarily have a nearest neighbour. An example of a $\mathcal{G}_{NN}$ for a realisation of a PPP within a fixed window is shown in Fig.\ref{COOPclustNN}.
\begin{figure}[t!]
\centering
\includegraphics[trim = 40mm 75mm 40mm 70mm, clip, width=0.36\textwidth]{NNgraphExem1.pdf}
\caption{Example of cooperation groups using the Nearest-Neighbour Model}
\label{COOPclustNN}
\end{figure}
\textbf{Model Variation:} Although the NNM guarantees that the groups are finite, there is no upper bound on the group size. When referring to a telecommunications network, however, it is often more reasonable to bound the maximum group size by a number $K$. For $K=2$ this means that there can appear only single atoms and pairs, for $K=3$ singles, pairs and triplets etc. It is this modification of the NNM that we propose and analyse in this work, because it will lead to more natural grouping of BSs. Algorithmically, starting by a realisation of single atoms, we first search for possible groups of two (pairs). These are formed when two atoms are mutually nearest neighbours of each other and we result in the case $K=2$. From this last constellation, to shift to the case $K=3$, we will consider the existing pairs. For each pair we will search among the single atoms to find if there exist some of them that have one of the pair as nearest neighbour. If so, we choose the geographically closest with this property and create a group of three. Observe that not all of the pairs will become triplets. We iterate in this way for larger $K$.
\section{The special case of NNM groups with $K=2$.}
\label{SecIII}
From this point on, the paper will be devoted to the study of the simplest of static cooperation cases, the case $K=2$.
\subsection{Singles and Pairs.}
\label{SinglePair}
The following definitions may apply to any process $\Phi$. In our work we will analyse the case where $\Phi$ is a PPP. For two different atoms $x,y\in\phi$, if $x$ is in \textit{Nearest Neighbour Relation (NNR)} with $y$, that is, if
\begin{eqnarray*}
y=\argmin_{z\in \phi\setminus \{x\} } d(x,z)
\end{eqnarray*}
we write $x \overset{\phi}{\rightarrow} y$. If this is not true we write $x\overset{\phi}{\nrightarrow} y$. We use $\Phi$ instead of $\phi$, when we consider the whole set of realisations $\Omega$ ($\omega\in\Omega$, $\Phi\left(\omega\right)=\phi$), i.e. when we calculate probabilities. We will omit the dependence on $\Phi$ or $\phi$ when it is clear from the context.
\begin{defi}
\label{defi1}
Two atoms $x,y\in \phi$, are in \textit{Mutually Nearest Neighbor Relation (MNNR)} if, and only if, $x \overset{\phi}{\rightarrow} y$ and $y \overset{\phi}{\rightarrow} x$. We denote this by $x \overset{\phi}{\leftrightarrow} y$. The two atoms then form a pair. In telecommunication terms we say that BSs $x$ and $y$ are in cooperation.
\end{defi}
\begin{defi}
\label{defi2}
An atom $x$ is called single if it is not in MNNR (does not cooperate) with any other atom in $\phi$. (Formally if for every $y\in \phi \setminus \{x\}$ such that $x\overset{\phi}{\rightarrow} y$, it holds that $y\overset{\phi}{\nrightarrow} x$). We denote this atom by $x _{\#}^{\phi}$. We then say that BS $x$ transmits individually.
\end{defi}
In geometric terms, the NNR $x \overset{\phi}{\rightarrow} y$ holds if and only if (iff) there exists a disc $\mathcal{B}\left(x,r\right)$ with radius $r=\left|x-y\right|$ empty of atoms in $\phi$. The nearest neighbour of $x$ is \textit{unique} in the case of PPP, because the probability of finding more than one atom on the circumference is zero. Furthermore, the MNNR holds, iff a symmetric relation is true i.e. the disc $\mathcal{B}\left(y,r\right)$ centred at $y$ with the same radius is empty. We conclude that the MNNR holds for $x,y$, iff the area $C\left(x,y\right):=\mathcal{B}\left(x,\left|x-y\right|\right)\cup\mathcal{B}\left(y,\left|x-y\right|\right)$ is empty of atoms. Its surface $\mathcal{S}$ is equal to $\mathcal{S}\left(C(x,y)\right)=\pi\left|x-y\right|^2\left(2-\gamma\right)$. Here, $\gamma:=\frac{2}{3}-\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2\pi}\approx 0.391$ \cite{DalStoSto99} is a constant number equal to the surface, divided by $\pi$, of the intersection of two discs with unit radius and centres lying on the circumference of each other. An illustration of the above explanations is given in figure \ref{SGD0:1}. On the other hand, figure \ref{SGD0:2} illustrates the single atom definition, where for any $y$ for which $x \overset{\phi}{\rightarrow} y$, the disc with centre $y$ and radius $\left|x-y\right|$ contains at least one atom of the process.
\begin{figure}[ht!]
\centering
\subfigure[The atoms $x$ and $y$ are in \textit{MNNR} $x \overset{\phi}{\leftrightarrow} y$ (i.e. $x \rightarrow y$, and $y\rightarrow x$).]{\includegraphics[trim = 20mm 50mm 5mm 50mm, clip, width=0.23\textwidth]{PairP2.pdf}
\label{SGD0:1}
}
\subfigure[The atom $w$ is a single and we write $w_{\#}^{\phi}$ (i.e. $w \rightarrow y$, but $y\nrightarrow w$).]{\includegraphics[trim = 20mm 50mm 5mm 50mm, clip, width=0.23\textwidth]{SingleP2.pdf}
\label{SGD0:2}
}
\caption{Illustration of a pair of atoms and a single atom.}
\end{figure}
With the above, and the empty space function for PPPs \cite{BacBlaVol1}, we find the probability of two atoms being in pair.
\begin{lem}
\label{Lemma1}
Given a PPP $\Phi$ with density $\lambda$ and conditioned that at $x,y\in\mathbb{R}^2$ there are two of its atoms, the probability that these are in MNNR is equal to
\begin{eqnarray}
\mathbb{P}\left(x \overset{\Phi}{\leftrightarrow} y\right) & = & e^{-\lambda\pi |x-y|^2(2-\gamma)},
\end{eqnarray}
where $\gamma := \frac{2}{3}-\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2\pi}$.
\end{lem}
Next, we give the global probability of any atom of $\Phi$ being single or in a pair. This result is shown from the point of view of an atom at $x$, i.e. involving the Palm measure $\mathbb{P}^{x}$ (see Appendix). We can heuristically understand the Palm measure as $\mathbb{P}^{x}(\cdot)=\mathbb{P}(\cdot | x\in \Phi)$ \cite{BaddNotes07}. This description explains well its use, but the probability of $\left\{x\in\Phi\right\}$ is always null. Still we can assume that there exists a point of $\Phi$ within a small neighbourhood around $x$ (say a ball with radius $\epsilon>0$ and centre $x$) and then calculate the required probability, taking the limit $\epsilon\rightarrow 0$.
\begin{theo}
\label{Percentage}
Given a PPP $\Phi$ with density $\lambda$ and $x\in \Phi$, there exists a constant $p^*$, independent of $\lambda$ and $x$, such that
\begin{equation}
\begin{split}
& \mathbb{P}\left( x \overset{\Phi}{\leftrightarrow} y, \mbox{ for some } y\in \Phi \right)=p^*.\\
& \mathbb{P}\left( x_{\#}^{\Phi} \right) = 1-p^*.
\end{split}
\end{equation}
Specifically, $p^* = \frac{1}{2-\gamma}\approx 0.6215$.
\end{theo}
We should remark that Theorem \ref{Percentage} gives also the percentage of points that are singles or in pair, for any planar area $A\subseteq\mathbb{R}^2$. This is independent of the point of view of an atom at $x$. It means that, in average, a percentage $37.85\%$ of atoms of $A\cap\Phi$ are singles and $62.15\%$ of atoms are in pair. This has been verified by Monte Carlo simulations over a finite (but large enough) window $A$. It can also be analytically evaluated, using $f(x)=\mathbbm{1}_{\left\{x\in A\right\}}$ in the expression (\ref{EPhi1}), later on. The MNNR criterion leads, hence, to a reasonable splitting of the initial process into two processes, one with singles and another one with pairs of cooperating BSs.
Now, we can define two new point processes $\Phi^{(1)}$ and $\Phi^{(2)}$ that result from the \textit{dependent thinning} of the PPP $\Phi$ with the MNNR criterion, using Definitions \ref{defi1} and \ref{defi2}
\begin{equation*}
\begin{split}
& \Phi^{(1)}=\{x\in \Phi\ \&\ x\ \text{is single} \}, \\
& \Phi^{(2)}=\{x\in \Phi\ \&\ x \ \text{cooperates with another element of}\ \Phi\}.
\end{split}
\end{equation*}
\subsection{Voronoi Cells.}
\label{VoronoiCells}
It follows naturally to investigate the size of Voronoi cells associated with single atoms or pairs. A Voronoi cell of atom $x\in\phi$ is defined to be the geometric locus of all planar points $z\in\mathbb{R}^2$ closer to this atom than to any other atom of $\phi$ \cite{CompGeomBook}. In a wireless network the Voronoi cell is important when answering the question, which users should be associated with which station. Let $z\curvearrowright \phi^{(1)}$ (resp. $z\curvearrowright\phi^{(2)}$) denote the event that $z$ belongs to the Voronoi cell of some atom of $\phi^{(1)}$ (resp. $\phi^{(2)}$). For the probability of these events we have analytical forms but not their numerical solutions, due to numerical issues related to integration over multiple overlapping circles.
\begin{NR}
\label{NR1}
The average surface proportion of Voronoi cells associated with single atoms and that associated with pairs of atoms is independent of the parameter $\lambda$. By Monte Carlo simulations, we find these values equal to
\begin{eqnarray}
\label{MCs}
\mathbb{P}\left(z\curvearrowright \Phi^{(1)}\right) & \approx & 0.4602.\\
\label{MCd}
\mathbb{P}\left(z\curvearrowright \Phi^{(2)}\right) & \approx & 0.5398.
\end{eqnarray}
\end{NR}
Interestingly, although the ratio of singles to pairs is $0.3785/0.6215$ the ratio of associated surface is $0.4602/0.5398$, implying that the typical Voronoi cell of a single atom is larger that that of an atom from a pair. The last remark gives first intuition that there is attraction between the cooperating atoms and a repulsion among the single atoms. We will further analyse these observations in the next section. We close this paragraph giving an example of the association cells for the singles and the pairs in Fig.\ref{SGDP}. For the pairs we consider the union of Voronoi cells of their individual atoms, as total association cell.
\begin{figure}[t!]
\centering
\includegraphics[trim = 15mm 65mm 10mm 65mm, clip, width=0.35\textwidth]{VoronoiP.pdf}
\caption{Example of planar association areas for singles and pairs for a realisation of a PPP in a square window of size $t=5$. It is based on the Voronoi tessellation.
}
\label{SGDP}
\end{figure}
\section{Characteristics of $\Phi^{(1)}$ and $\Phi^{(2)}$.}
\label{SecIV}
In this section we consider each one of the two newly defined processes $\Phi^{(1)}$ and $\Phi^{(2)}$ separately and analyse their behaviour. Specifically, we try to establish possible similarities related to PPPs and for each one discuss issues of repulsion and attraction between their atoms.
\subsection{Non-Poissonian behaviour.}
A first property is that both processes are \textit{homogeneous}. This is due to the homogeneity of $\Phi$ and because by definition, $\Phi^{(2)}$ depends only on the distance between elements of $\Phi$. Similarly for $\Phi^{(1)}$.
Since the two processes result from a dependent thinning of a PPP $\Phi$ they may not be PPPs. In fact we can show that they are not: Suppose that $\Phi^{(2)}$ is a homogeneous PPP. As shown in Theorem \ref{Percentage}, the percentage of its atoms in \textit{MNNR} with some other atom of $\Phi^{(2)}$ should be around $62.15\%$. However, by definition, $100\%$ of the elements of $\Phi^{(2)}$ are in \textit{MNNR} and we conclude that $\Phi^{(2)}$ is not a PPP. For $\Phi^{(1)}$ the argumentation is not as simple. Nevertheless, we can show this with Monte Carlo simulations on the average number of single points, which is far from the number $1-p^*=37.85\%$, and also using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test \cite{Sheskin07}, which shows that the number of $\Phi^{(1)}$ atoms within a finite window is not Poisson distributed.
In what follows, we will use the PPP as reference process for comparison with the two new processes. For this, we consider two independent PPPs, $\hat{\Phi}^{(1)}$ and $\hat{\Phi}^{(2)}$, that result from independent thinning of the original PPP with probability $1-p^*$ and $p^*$ respectively. This is motivated from Theorem \ref{Percentage}. These PPPs will have density $\lambda_1=\lambda(1-p^*)$ and $\lambda_2=\lambda p^*$, which gives the same average number of points as the processes $\Phi^{(1)}$ and $\Phi^{(2)}$.
\subsection{Nearest Neighbour function.}
The \textit{Nearest Neighbour function (NN)}, denoted by \textit{G}, is the cumulative distribution function (cdf) of the distance from a typical atom of the process to the nearest other atom of the process \cite{BaddNotes07}. We first analyse $\Phi^{(2)}$ and for this we denote by $\mathbb{P}^{(2),x}$, and $G^{(2)}(r)$ the associated Palm probability measure and \textit{NN} function of the distance $r\geq 0$, respectively.
\begin{theo}
\label{TheoNN2}
The NN function of $\Phi^{(2)}$ is equal to
\begin{eqnarray}
\label{NNPhi2}
G^{(2)}(r) & = & \mathbb{P}^{(2),x}(d(x,\Phi^{(2)}\setminus \{x\})\leq r)\nonumber\\
& = & 1-e^{-\lambda\pi r^2 (2-\gamma)},
\end{eqnarray}
where $\gamma$ is the same constant as in Lemma \ref{Lemma1}.
\end{theo}
Hence, the NN random variable (r.v.) is Rayleigh distributed, with scale parameter $\sigma=(2\lambda\pi(2-\gamma)).^{-1/2}$. Unfortunately, we have not been able to provide a closed analytic expression for the \textit{NN} function of the process $\Phi^{(1)}$, as we did for $\Phi^{(2)}$ in equation \eqref{NNPhi2}. In Figures \ref{fig:SGD2_2} and \ref{fig:SGD2_1} we plot the NN function of $\Phi^{(1)}$ using Monte Carlo simulations and $\Phi^{(2)}$ from the analytic expression in (\ref{NNPhi2}), respectively. Both plots are compared to the NN functions of the independent PPPs $\hat{\Phi}^{(1)}$ and $\hat{\Phi}^{(2)}$. These are equal to (for $i\in\left\{1,2\right\}$)
\begin{eqnarray}
\label{NNindiPhii}
\hat{G}^{(i)}(r) & = & \mathbb{P}^{x}(d(x,\hat{\Phi}^{(i)}\setminus \{x\})\leq r)\nonumber\\
& = & 1-e^{-\lambda_i\pi r^2}.
\end{eqnarray}
To get an intuition how different the results are, observe that the exponent in the PPP case $\hat{G}^{(2)}$ depends on the density $\lambda_2=\lambda/(2-\gamma)$, whereas the expression for $G^{(2)}$ is the same but with exponent $\lambda\left(2-\gamma\right)$. This observation explains why the use of independent thinning would be an inappropriate approximation in our case.
\begin{figure*}
\begin{tabular}{c c c}
\subfigure[\textit{NN} of $\Phi^{(1)}$ (blue point) and $\hat{\Phi}^{(1)}$ (red dash).]{\includegraphics[trim = 15mm 65mm 10mm 65mm, clip, width=0.32\textwidth]{Phi1NNgraphII.pdf}
\label{fig:SGD2_2}
}
&
\subfigure[\textit{ES} of $\Phi^{(1)}$ (blue point) and $\hat{\Phi}^{(1)}$ (red dash).]{\includegraphics[trim = 15mm 65mm 10mm 65mm, clip, width=0.32\textwidth]{Phi1ESgraphII.pdf}
\label{fig:SGD3_1}
}
&
\subfigure[\textit{J} function of $\Phi^{(1)}$.]{\includegraphics[trim = 18mm 57mm 10mm 55mm, clip, width=0.29\textwidth]{JFPhi1deux.pdf}
\label{fig:SGD5_1}
}\\
\subfigure[\textit{NN} of $\Phi^{(2)}$ (blue point) and $\hat{\Phi}^{(2)}$ (red dash).]{\includegraphics[trim = 15mm 65mm 10mm 65mm, clip, width=0.32\textwidth]{Phi2NNgraphII.pdf}
\label{fig:SGD2_1}
}
&
\subfigure[\textit{ES} of $\Phi^{(2)}$ (blue point) and $\hat{\Phi}^{(2)}$ (red dash).]{\includegraphics[trim = 15mm 65mm 10mm 65mm, clip, width=0.32\textwidth]{Phi2ESgraphII.pdf}
\label{fig:SGD3_2}
}
&
\subfigure[\textit{J} function of $\Phi^{(2)}$.]{\includegraphics[trim = 18mm 65mm 10mm 65mm, clip, width=0.32\textwidth]{Phi2JgraphII.pdf}
\label{fig:SGD5_2}
}
\end{tabular}
\caption{NN function, ES function and J function for the processes $\Phi^{(1)}$, $\Phi^{(2)}$ and their comparison with the PPPs $\hat{\Phi}^{(1)}$ and $\hat{\Phi}^{(2)}$. }
\end{figure*}
\subsection{Empty Space function.}
The \textit{empty space function (ES)}, denoted by \textit{F}, is the cdf of the distance from a fixed planar point $z\in \mathbb{R}^{2}$ to the nearest atom of the point process considered \cite{BaddNotes07}. By stationarity of $\Phi^{(1)}$ and $\Phi^{(2)}$, the function F does not depend on $z$, so we can consider the typical user (point) at the Cartesian origin. Unfortunately, we have not been able to derive analytical formulas for either of the two $F^{(1)}$ and $F^{(2)}$. The ES functions of the independent PPPs are denoted by $\hat{F}^{(1)}$ and $\hat{F}^{(2)}$ and they are equal to the expression of the NN functions in (\ref{NNindiPhii}). This is a property of the PPPs \cite{BaddNotes07}.
We have used Monte Carlo simulations to plot the ES of the two processes. In Fig.\ref{fig:SGD3_1} we show the comparison between $F^{(1)}$ and $\hat{F}^{(1)}$, which - unexpectedly - seem very close to each other. The same comparison in Fig.\ref{fig:SGD3_2} shows also closeness of fit, although less tight, between $F^{(2)}$ and $\hat{F}^{(2)}$.
Since we have no analytic expressions, we are tempted to consider the ES function of the independently thinned PPPs as a reasonable approximation for those of $\Phi^{(1)}$ and $\Phi^{(2)}$.
\subsection{The \textit{J} function.}\label{Jfunction}
The two functions NN and ES can be combined into a single expression known as $J$ function. The latter is a tool introduced by van Lieshout and Baddeley \cite{BaddNotes07} to measure repulsion and/or attraction between the atoms of a point process. It is defined as
\begin{equation}
J(r)=\frac{1-G(r)}{1-F(r)}.
\end{equation}
In the case of the uniform PPP, $G\left(r\right)\equiv F\left(r\right)$ and $J\left(r\right)=1$, as a consequence of the fact that the reduced Campbell measure is identical to the original measure. Hence the $J$ function quantifies the differences of any process with the PPP. When $J(r)>1$, this is an indicator of repulsion between atoms, whereas $J(r)<1$ indicates attraction. We plot in Fig.\ref{fig:SGD5_1} the \textit{J} function of $\Phi^{(1)}$ and in Fig.\ref{fig:SGD5_2} that of $\Phi^{(2)}$. From the figures we conclude \textit{that $\Phi^{(1)}$ exhibits repulsion for every $r\geq 0$, and $\Phi^{(2)}$ attraction everywhere}. However, note that the attraction in the case $\Phi^{(2)}$ is due to the pairs formed. If we consider a new process having as elements the pairs of $\Phi^{(2)}$, this process of pairs exhibits repulsion everywhere.
\section{Interference Analysis}
\label{SecV}
The purpose of the previous analysis was to develop the tools necessary for use in a communications context. Within this context, the cooperating BSs will have a different influence on the interference seen by a user in the network, than those operating individually. The current section will focus on the \textit{interference field} generated by $\Phi^{(1)}$ and $\Phi^{(2)}$. As shown in Section \ref{SecIV}, the two processes have a different behaviour compared to a PPP and this is why approximations based on independent thinning of $\Phi$ will not bring accurate results. We thus have to resort to a more direct approach.
We denote by $\mathcal{I}^{(1)}$ and $\mathcal{I}^{(2)}$, the interference field generated by $\Phi^{(1)}$ and $\Phi^{(2)}$, respectively. The typical user is chosen at the Cartesian origin due to stationarity. To keep our setting as general as possible we describe by use of measurable functions $f:\mathbb{R}^2\longrightarrow \mathbb{R}^+$, $g:\mathbb{R}^2\times\mathbb{R}^2\longrightarrow \mathbb{R}^+$ the signals transmitted by a single BS or by a pair and received at the typical user. The sum over the entire (of each) process gives the random variables of interest
\begin{eqnarray}
\label{I1}
\mathcal{I}^{(1)} & = & \sum_{x\in \phi^{(1)}} f(x),\\
\label{I2}
\mathcal{I}^{(2)} & = & \frac{1}{2}\sum_{x\in \phi^{(2)}} \sum_{y\in \phi^{(2)}}^{\neq}g(x,y) \mathbbm{1}_{\left\{x \overset{\phi^{(2)}}{\leftrightarrow} y\right\}}.
\end{eqnarray}
The $1/2$ in front of the summation in (\ref{I2}) prevents us from considering a pair twice, whereas $\neq$ implies that $y\in\phi^{(2)}\setminus\left\{x\right\}$.
We now give some practical examples for the functions under study. First of all, the function for the individual BS in this analysis will be equal to
\begin{equation}
\label{fx}
f(x) = h(0,x)
\end{equation}
where $h(z,x)$ was defined in (\ref{channelH}). This is the signal from a single antenna BS that lies at distance $\left|0-x\right|$ from the user $0$. The fading power $\nu(0,x)$ follows the $\exp(1/P)$ distribution, where $P$ is the BS transmission power \cite{AndrewsCoverage}. The cooperation signal is more interesting. We can consider the following cases
\begin{eqnarray}
\label{gFUN}
g\left(x,y\right) = \left\{\begin{tabular}{l l}
$h(0,x)+h(0,y)$ & [NC]\\
$\max\left\{h(0,x),h(0,y)\right\}$ & [OF1]\\
$\mathbbm{1}_{on}h(0,x)+(1-\mathbbm{1}_{on})h(0,y)$ & [OF2]\\
$\left|\sqrt{h(0,x)}e^{i\theta_x}+\sqrt{h(0,y)}e^{i\theta_y}\right|^2$ & [PH]
\end{tabular}\right..
\end{eqnarray}
[NC] refers to the no cooperation case, where both BSs of the pair behave individually. [OF1] refers to the case where the BS with the strongest interfering signal is actively serving its user, while the other is off (alternatively we could replace $\max$ by $\min$ to consider the weakest signal of the two). [OF2] is again a scenario with one of the two BSs active and the other off, where the choice is made randomly by a r.v. with $\mathbb{E}\left[\mathbbm{1}_{on}\right]=q$ (e.g. $q=0.5$ for fairness). Finally, [PH] is the case where the two complex signals are combined in phase as well \cite{AGFBTWC14}. Here, $i$ is the complex unit and $\theta_x,\theta_y$ are the uniformly random phases of the signals. Observe that the above signals can be generalised to include MIMO transmission as well.
\subsection{Expected value of $\mathcal{I}^{(1)}$ and $\mathcal{I}^{(2)}$.}
The next Theorem gives an exact integral expression to the expected value of the interference field generated by the singles and the pairs. The proof uses the Campbell-Little-Mecke formula, Lemma \ref{Lemma1}, and Theorem \ref{Percentage}.
\begin{theo}\label{Expected}
The expected value of the \textit{interference field} generated by $\Phi^{(1)}$ and $\Phi^{(2)}$ is given by
\begin{align}
\label{EPhi1}
\mathbb{E} \left[\mathcal{I}^{(1)}\right] &= (1-p^*) \int_{\mathbb{R}^2}\mathbb{E}\left[f(x)\right] \lambda dx, \\
\label{EPhi2}
\mathbb{E} \left[\mathcal{I}^{(2)}\right] &= \frac{1}{2} \int_{\mathbb{R}^2} \int_{\mathbb{R}^2}\mathbb{E}\left[g(x,y)\right]e^{-\lambda\pi |x-y|^2(2-\gamma)}\lambda dy \lambda dx.
\end{align}
\end{theo}
The expected value can be finite or infinite, depending on the choice of $f(x)$ and $g(x,y)$. Observe that for [NC] and [PH] the expected interference has the same value.
\begin{cor}[Intensity measure]
\label{CorIM}
The intensity measures for $\Phi^{(1)}$ and $\Phi^{(2)}$, denoted by $M^{(1)}$ and $M^{(2)}$ respectively, are equal to
\begin{eqnarray}
M^{(1)}(dx) & = & (1-p^*)\lambda dx, \\
M^{(2)}(dx)& = & p^*\lambda dx.
\end{eqnarray}
\end{cor}
\subsection{Laplace transform of $\mathcal{I}^{(1)}$ and $\mathcal{I}^{(2)}$.}
As a final result we present our findings related to the Laplace transform (LT) of the interference from $\Phi^{(1)}$ and $\Phi^{(2)}$. We derive here the exact LT of the interference when considering a finite subset $A\subset\mathbb{R}^2$ (window) and the related random point measure
\begin{equation*}
\begin{split}
& \Phi^{(1)}_A =\left\{
\mbox
single atoms of $\Phi(A)=\Phi\cap A$ inside $A$
}
\right\}\\
& \Phi^{(2)}_A =\left\{
\mbox
atoms of $\Phi(A)$ in \textit{MNNR} with another atom in $A$
}
\right\}\\
\end{split}
\end{equation*}
A sketch of proof is given due to space constraints. For finite subsets, the atoms of the PPP $\Phi$ are distributed i.i.d. uniformly within $A$. We condition on the number of atoms that appear within $A$, and make use of the fact that $\Phi$ is a PPP (or some other process with known counting measure). We also consider the MNNR only among the atoms in $A$ and not on the entire plane. Then by direct application of the expected value of a function $\chi$, we can write the LT as an infinite sum of terms $\chi(n)\mathbb{P}\left(N(A)=n\right)$, where $\chi(n)$ is the value of the function when $n$ atoms appear in $A$ and $\mathbb{P}\left(N(A)=n\right)$ is the probability that this event occurs.
The method can be seen as an approximation of the LT of $\Phi^{(1)}$ and $\Phi^{(2)}$. It is an open question to prove that when $A\rightarrow\mathbb{R}^2$ the LT of the finite process converges to the LT we are looking for. We write $\Phi^{(i)}\approx \Phi^{(i)}_A$, for $A$ regular and large enough. However, since we are often interested in simulating and analysing only finite areas and also since the conjecture in the limiting case sounds reasonable, the result we present here has a great importance. It fully characterises the distribution of the interference (and is provable for finite windows).
For a finite number $n$ of known planar points $x_1,\ldots,x_n\in A$ (that are potentially occupied by atoms, when the latter are chosen uniformly within the area), we define the functions $H^{(n)}:\left(\mathbb{R}^2\right)^n\rightarrow (\mathbb{R}^+)^n$ and $J^{(n)}:\left(\mathbb{R}^2\right)^n\rightarrow (\mathbb{R}^+)^{n^2}$
\begin{equation*}
H^{(n)}_i(x_1,\ldots,x_n)=\begin{cases}
1, & \mbox{if} \ x_i \ \mbox{satisfies the "single" relation.}\\
0, & \mbox{otherwise.}
\end{cases}
\end{equation*}
The "single" relation is satisfied in the deterministic case, exactly as in Definition \ref{defi2} if, for every $x_j\neq x_i$ for which $x_i \rightarrow x_j$ it holds that $x_j \nrightarrow x_i$. Then $H^{(n)}=(H_1^{(n)},\ldots,H_n^{(n)})^T$.
\begin{equation*}
J^{(n)}_{i}(x_1,\ldots,x_n)=\begin{cases}
(0\ldots 1\ldots), & \mbox{if} \ x_i \ \mbox{is in "pair" with}\ x_j.\\
(0\ldots0), & \mbox{ in other case.}
\end{cases}
\end{equation*}
The "pair" relation is satisfied in the deterministic case, as in Definition \ref{defi1} if $x_i \leftrightarrow x_j$, for some $i\neq j$. Then $J^{(n)}=(J_1^{(n)},\ldots,J_n^{(n)})^T$, where $J^T$ is the transpose vector of $J$.
\begin{theo}[Laplace transform]
\label{LaplaceTransform}
Consider a PPP $\Phi$ with density $\lambda$, a subset $A\subset{\mathbb{R}^2}$ and the functions $f,g$ (e.g. (\ref{fx}) and (\ref{gFUN})) related to the single atoms and the pairs respectively. Let $F^{(n)}(x_1,\ldots,x_n)=(f(x_1),\ldots,f(x_n))$, $G_i^{(n)}(x_1,\ldots,x_n)=(g(x_i,x_1)\ldots g(x_i,x_n))$, and $G^{(n)}=(G_1^{(n)}\ldots G_n^{(n)})$.
The LT of the interference $\mathcal{I}^{(1)}$ for $\Phi^{(1)}_A$ is equal to
\begin{equation*}
\begin{split}
& \mathbb{E} \left[ e^{-s\mathcal{I}^{(1)}} \right] = e^{-\lambda\mathcal{S}(A)} \Bigg(1 + \lambda\int_A \mathbb{E}\left[e^{-sf(x)}\right] dx + \frac{\lambda^2}{2}+ \\
& +\sum^ \infty_{n=3} \frac{\lambda^n}{n!}\int_A \ldots \int_A \mathbb{E}\left[e^{-sF^{(n)}\cdot H^{(n)}}\right] dx_1 \ldots dx_n \Bigg),
\end{split}
\end{equation*}
The LT of the interference $\mathcal{I}^{(2)}$ for $\Phi^{(2)}_A$ is equal to
\begin{equation*}
\begin{split}
& \mathbb{E}\left[e^{-s\mathcal{I}^{(2)}}\right]= e^{-\lambda \mathcal{S}(A)} \Bigg(1 + \lambda \mathcal{S}(A) \\
& +\frac{\lambda^2}{2} \int_A\int_A \mathbb{E}\left[e^{-\frac{s}{2}(g(x,y)+g(y,x))}\right]\lambda dy \lambda dx \\
& +\sum^ \infty_{n=3} \frac{\lambda^n}{n!}\int_A \ldots \int_A \mathbb{E}\left[e^{-\frac{s}{2}G^{(n)}\cdot J^{(n)}}\right]dx_1 \ldots dx_n \Bigg).
\end{split}
\end{equation*}
\end{theo}
We finish this section by evaluating the expected value of the interference using Theorem \ref{Expected} and the proposed expressions for $f(x)$ in (\ref{fx}) and for $g(x,y)$ in (\ref{gFUN}). We further compare the results from the numerical integration with those by Monte Carlo simulations within a finite - but large enough - window. The chosen density is $\lambda=0.1$ [atoms/$m^2$] and the window is a square of size $100\times 100$ [$m^2$].
Specifically for $\mathcal{I}_1$, we first transform in polar coordinates (\ref{EPhi1}) and then perform numerical integration, for the function $f(r_x)=h(0,r_x)\mathbbm{1}_{\left\{r_x> R\right\}}$, with $\nu(0,(r_x,\theta_x)):=1$. Here, $R$ is a positive distance, within the interval $R\in\left[0.5,5\right]$. The indicator function is used in order to calculate the interference created by singles outside a ball centred at $0$ and of radius $R$. The evaluation is shown in Fig. \ref{SingleIR} with a continuous line. The results from the simulations are shown by the star-dotted curve. With the appropriate window, the expression in (\ref{Expected}) gives almost identical results with the simulations.
\begin{figure}[t!]
\centering
\includegraphics[trim = 0mm 50mm 5mm 60mm, clip, width=0.35\textwidth]{SingleInterference1.pdf}
\caption{Interference generated by the single atoms outside a ball of radius R. The upper plot shows the case with path-loss exponent $\beta=2.5$ and the lower plot the case with $\beta=4$.}
\label{SingleIR}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure}[t!]
\centering
\includegraphics[trim = 0mm 50mm 5mm 60mm, clip, width=0.35\textwidth]{InterferenceDoubles1.pdf}
\caption{Interference generated by pairs of atoms outside a ball of radius R. The upper two plot shows the case with path-loss exponent $\beta=2.5$ and the lower two plots the case with $\beta=4$. We show the two cooperation scenarios [NC] and [OF1].}
\label{DoubleIR}
\end{figure}
Similarly for $\mathcal{I}_2$, numerical evaluation and simulation results using $g(r_x,r_y)\mathbbm{1}_{\left\{r_x,r_y> R\right\}}$ are shown in Fig.\ref{DoubleIR}. For the numerical integration, we evaluate the two cases [NC] and [OF1] for different path-loss exponent. Obviously interference from [OF1] is always less than [NC] since it is received only from one of the two BSs of each pair, while the other is silent. Nevertheless, the two scenarios do not numerically defer much for $\beta=4$, as shown in the figure.
\section{General case and Conclusions}
The analysis for the dependent thinning of a PPP using the NNM can be generalised to include groups of atoms with size greater than two. For the computation of such probabilities, certain difficulties are raised due to the overlapping of more than two discs with different radii. However, the methodology remains the same. Results on the percentage of atoms, Voronoi surface and repulsion/attraction, which are independent of the PPP density, can be derived by Monte Carlo simulations. The same analysis for the expectation and the LT of the interference can also be followed in cases of larger groups.
Altogether, in this paper we proposed a method to define static groups of cooperating Base Stations based on the Nearest Neighbour Model and analyse them with the use of stochastic geometry. Many structural characteristics were derived for the case of singles and pairs. These can be further used in the analysis of $\mathrm{SINR}$ models and their performance evaluation. We gave some first results by calculating the expected value and the Laplace transform of the interference from different groups. Further analysis and applications in this direction is the current research work of the authors.
\section*{Acknowledgment}
The authors gratefully thank Prof. Fran\c{c}ois Baccelli for suggesting the Nearest Neighbour Model and providing related literature.
\section*{Appendix}
\label{Appendix}
\subsection*{Proof of Theorem \ref{Percentage}.}
\label{AppendixA}
Let us condition on the fact that an atom lies at the planar point $x$ and then find the probability that this is in pair (single). This is written as $\mathbb{P}^x\left( x \overset{\Phi}{\leftrightarrow} y, \mbox{ for some } y\in \Phi\setminus{\left\{x\right\}} \right)$, where $\mathbb{P}^x$ is the Palm measure. We use Slivnyak-Mecke's theorem \cite{BacBlaVol1} , which states that $\Phi\setminus\left\{x\right\}$ under $\mathbb{P}^{x}$ has the same distribution as $\Phi$ under $\mathbb{P}$.
\begin{equation*}
\begin{split}
\mathbb{P}\left( x \overset{\Phi}{\leftrightarrow} y, \mbox{ for some } y\in \Phi \right)= & \mathbb{E}\left( \mathbbm{1}_{\left\{ x \overset{\Phi}{\leftrightarrow} y, \mbox{ for some } y\in \Phi \right\}} \right)\\
\stackrel{(a)}{=} & \mathbb{E}\left( \sum_{y\in \Phi} \mathbbm{1}_{ \left\{ x \overset{\Phi}{\leftrightarrow} y \right\}} \right)\\
\stackrel{(b)}{=} & \int_{\mathbb{R}^2} \mathbb{E} \left( \mathbbm{1}_{\{ x \overset{\Phi}{\leftrightarrow} y\}}\right) \lambda dy\\
= & \int_{\mathbb{R}^2} \mathbb{P} \left( x \overset{\Phi}{\leftrightarrow} y \right)\lambda dy\\
\stackrel{(c)}{=} & \int_{\mathbb{R}^2} e^{-\lambda\pi |x-y|^2(2-\gamma)} \lambda dy\\
= & \int^\infty_0 \int^{2 \pi}_0 e^{-\lambda \pi r^2(2-\gamma)} \lambda d\theta rdr \\
= & \frac{1}{(2-\gamma)} \approx \ 0.6215.
\end{split}
\end{equation*}
Equality (a) holds because for PPPs the nearest neighbour of an atom is a.s. unique, so we cannot have three atoms $x,y,w\in\phi$ with $y\neq w$, such that $x \overset{\phi}{\leftrightarrow} y$ and $x \overset{\phi}{\leftrightarrow} w$. Equality (b) comes from Campbell's formula \cite{BacBlaVol1} and in (c) we use Lemma \ref{Lemma1}.
Similarly, to find the probability of $x\in\Phi$ being single
\begin{equation*}
\begin{split}
\mathbb{P}^{x}\Big( x^{\Phi}_{\#} \Big)= & 1-\mathbb{P}^{x}\left( x \overset{\Phi}{\leftrightarrow} y, \mbox{ for some } y\setminus{\left\{x\right\}}\in \Phi \right) \\
= & \frac{1-\gamma}{2-\gamma}\approx 0.3785.
\end{split}
\end{equation*}
\subsection*{Palm measures and the \textit{NN} function of $\Phi^{(2)}$.}
\label{AppendixB}
Let $\left(\Omega,\mathcal{F},\mathbb{P}\right)$ be the underlying probability space and $\Phi$ a PPP. The Palm measure of $\Phi$ is $\mathbb{P}^x$. We denote by $\mathbb{P}^{(1),x}$ and $\mathbb{P}^{(2),x}$ the Palm measure of $\Phi^{(1)}$ and $\Phi^{(2)}$, respectively. Let us first consider $\mathbb{P}^{(2),x}$ and use the heuristic definition $\mathbb{P}^{(2),x}(\cdot)=\mathbb{P}(\cdot | x\in \Phi^{(2)})$, where we condition on the existence of one atom of $\Phi$ in a small neighbourhood of $x$. By Definition \ref{defi1}, $x\in \phi^{(2)}$ if, and only if, $\mathcal{A}_x$ holds, where
\begin{equation*}
\begin{split}
\mathcal{A}_x & =\big\{\mbox{there exists some } y\in \phi\backslash \{x\} \mbox{ such that } x\leftrightarrow y \big\}\\
& = \left\{\sum_{y\in \phi\backslash \{x\}}\mathbbm{1}_{\{x \overset{\phi}{\leftrightarrow} y\}}= 1\right\}.
\end{split}
\end{equation*}
Also, from Theorem \ref{Percentage}, $\mathbb{P}^x(\mathcal{A}_x)=p^*$ for PPPs. For every $\Gamma \in \mathcal{F}$,
\begin{eqnarray}
\label{P2x}
\begin{split}
\mathbb{P}^{(2),x}(\Gamma) & =\mathbb{P}(\ \Gamma \ | x\in \Phi,\mathcal{A}_x)\\
& =\frac{\mathbb{P}(\Gamma , \mathcal{A}_x | x\in \Phi)}{\mathbb{P}(\mathcal{A}_x|x\in \Phi)}\\
& =\frac{\mathbb{P}^x(\Gamma , \mathcal{A}_x )}{\mathbb{P}^x(\mathcal{A}_x)}\\
& =\mathbb{P}^x(\Gamma | \mathcal{A}_x ) \\
& =\mathbb{P}^x(\Gamma , \mathcal{A}_x )\frac{1}{p^*}.
\end{split}
\end{eqnarray}
For a rigorous proof of the Palm measure for $\Phi^{(2)}$, we refer the reader to the last part of the Appendix.
To calculate the \textit{NN function} of $\Phi^{(2)}$, let us take $r\geq 0$ and consider $\Gamma=\big\{d(x,\Phi^{(2)}\backslash \{x\})\leq r\big\}$. Then,
\begin{equation*}
\begin{split}
G^{(2)}(r) & =\mathbb{P}^{(2),x}\Big(d(x,\Phi^{(2)}\backslash \{x\})\leq r\Big)\\
& \stackrel{(\ref{P2x})}{=} \mathbb{P}^x\Big(d(x,\Phi^{(2)}\backslash \{x\})\leq r , \mathcal{A}_x \Big)\frac{1}{p^*}\\
& =\mathbb{E}^x\left( \sum_{y\in \Phi\backslash \{x\}}\mathbbm{1}_{\{ d(x,\Phi^{(2)}\backslash \{x\})\leq r , x\leftrightarrow y \} }\right)\frac{1}{p^*}.\\
\end{split}
\end{equation*}
For every $\phi$ and $y\in \phi\backslash \{x\}$, if $x\leftrightarrow y$, it is true that
\begin{equation}
\label{equality}
d(x,\phi^{(2)}\backslash \{x\})=d(x,\phi \backslash \{x\})=d(x,y).
\end{equation}
We use this observation, Slivnyak-Mecke's theorem, the Campbell-Little-Mecke formula, and Lemma \ref{Lemma1}, to find that
\begin{equation*}
\begin{split}
G^{(2)}(r) & =\mathbb{E}\left( \sum_{y\in \Phi}\mathbbm{1}_{\{ d(x,y)\leq r , x\leftrightarrow y \} }\right)\frac{1}{p^*}\\
& =\mathbb{E}\left( \sum_{y\in \Phi}\mathbbm{1}_{\{ d(0,y)\leq r , 0\leftrightarrow y \} }\right)\frac{1}{p^*}\\
& =\int_{\mathbb{R}^2}\mathbb{E}\left( \mathbbm{1}_{\{ d(0,y)\leq r , 0\leftrightarrow y \} }\right)\lambda dy \frac{1}{p^*}\\
& =\int_{\mathbb{R}^2}\mathbb{P}\Big( d(0,y)\leq r , 0\leftrightarrow y \Big)\lambda dy \frac{1}{p^*}\\
& =\int^{2\pi}_0 \int^\infty_0\mathbb{P}\Big( s\leq r , 0\leftrightarrow (s,\theta) \Big)\lambda s ds d\theta \frac{1}{p^*}\\
& =2\pi \lambda \int^r_0\mathbb{P}\Big( 0\leftrightarrow (s,\theta) \Big) s ds \frac{1}{p^*}\\
& =2\pi \lambda \int^r_0e^{-\lambda \pi s^2(2-\gamma)} s ds \frac{1}{p^*}\\
&=1-e^{-\lambda \pi r^2(2-\gamma)},\\
\end{split}
\end{equation*}
where the last equality is due to the fact that $p^*=\frac{1}{(2-\gamma)}$
We further remind the reader that $x\in \phi^{(1)}$ if, and only if, the event $\mathcal{B}_x$ holds, where
\begin{equation*}
\mathcal{B}_x=\{\mbox{ for every } y\in \phi\backslash \{x\} \mbox{ such that } x\rightarrow y, \ y\nrightarrow x\}.
\end{equation*}
It is possible to give a similar expression to $\mathbb{P}^{(1),x}$ in the same way as we did for $\mathbb{P}^{(2),x}$. For every $\Gamma \in \mathcal{F}$,
\begin{eqnarray*}
\mathbb{P}^{(1),x}(\Gamma) & =\mathbb{P}^x(\Gamma | \mathcal{B}_x) & = \frac{\mathbb{P}^x(\Gamma , \mathcal{B}_x)}{(1-p^*)}.
\end{eqnarray*}
It has not been possible however to make a similar analysis to get the \textit{NN function} of $\Phi^{(1)}$. The reason is that it is not easy to precisely define the nearest neighbour atom in this case. A property similar to that in equation \eqref{equality}, which was crucial in the previous proof, could not be found.
\subsection*{Proof of Theorem \ref{Expected}.}
\label{AppendixC}
Let us start with $\mathcal{I}^{(1)}$. We observe that
\begin{equation*}
\mathcal{I}^{(1)} = \sum_{x\in \phi^{(1)}}f(x)=\sum_{x\in \phi}f(x)\mathbbm{1}_{\left\{x^\Phi_{\#}\right\}}\ \mathbb{P}\ a.s.,
\end{equation*}
and that, for every $x\in\phi$
\begin{equation*}
\begin{split}
\mathbbm{1}_{\{x^\phi_{\#}\}} = & \sum_{y\in \phi \backslash \{x\}}\mathbbm{1}_{\left\{x\overset{\phi}{\rightarrow} y,y \overset{\phi}{\nrightarrow} x \right\}
\end{split}
\end{equation*}
By the reduced Campbell-Little-Mecke formula and Slivnyak-Mecke's Theorem,
\begin{equation*}
\begin{split}
\mathbb{E}\left[\mathcal{I}^{(1)} \right]= & \mathbb{E}\left[\sum_{x\in \Phi}\sum_{y\in \Phi \backslash \{x\} }f(x)\mathbbm{1}_{\left\{x\overset{\phi}{\rightarrow} y,y \overset{\phi}{\nrightarrow} x \right\}}\right]\\
= & \int_{\mathbb{R}^2}\int_{\mathbb{R}^2}\mathbb{E}\left[f(x)\mathbbm{1}_{\left\{x\overset{\phi}{\rightarrow} y,y \overset{\phi}{\nrightarrow} x \right\}}\right]\lambda dy \lambda dx\\
= & \int_{\mathbb{R}^2}\mathbb{E}\left[f(x)\right]\int_{\mathbb{R}^2}\mathbb{E}\left[\mathbbm{1}_{\left\{x\overset{\phi}{\rightarrow} y,y \overset{\phi}{\nrightarrow} x \right\}}\right]\lambda dy \lambda dx\\
\stackrel{(a)}{=} & \int_{\mathbb{R}^2}\mathbb{E}\left[f(x)\right]\mathbb{P}\big(x^\Phi_{\#}\big) \lambda dx\\
\stackrel{(b)}{=} & (1-p^*) \int_{\mathbb{R}^2}\mathbb{E}\left[f(x)\right] \lambda dx,\\
\end{split}
\end{equation*}
where (a) and (b) come from the proof of Theorem \ref{Percentage}.
For $\mathcal{I}^{(2)}$, we make the observation that
\begin{equation*}
\begin{split}
& \sum_{x\in \phi^{(2)}} \sum_{y\in \phi^{(2)}}^{\neq}g(x,y)\mathbbm{1}_{\left\{x \overset{\phi^{(2)}}{\leftrightarrow} y\right\}} = \sum_{x\in \phi} \sum_{y\in \phi}^{\neq} g(x,y)\mathbbm{1}_{\left\{x \overset{\phi}{\leftrightarrow} y\right\}}.
\end{split}
\end{equation*}
Then, as previously (and using Theorem \ref{Percentage}) we can calculate the expected value of the interference from pairs
\begin{equation*}
\begin{split}
\mathbb{E}\left[\mathcal{I}^{(2)}\right]= & \mathbb{E}\left[\sum_{x\in \Phi} \sum_{y\in \Phi\setminus\left\{x\right\}} g(x,y)\mathbbm{1}_{\left\{x \overset{\Phi}{\leftrightarrow} y\right\}}\right]\\
\stackrel{(c)}{=} & \int_{\mathbb{R}^2}\int_{\mathbb{R}^2} \mathbb{E}\left[g(x,y)\mathbbm{1}_{\left\{x \overset{\Phi}{\leftrightarrow} y\right\}}\right] \lambda dy \lambda dx \\
= & \int_{\mathbb{R}^2}\int_{\mathbb{R}^2} \mathbb{E}\left[g(x,y)\right]\mathbb{P}\left(x \overset{\Phi}{\leftrightarrow} y\right) \lambda dy \lambda dx\\
\stackrel{(d)}{=} & \int_{\mathbb{R}^2}\int_{\mathbb{R}^2} \mathbb{E}\left[g(x,y)\right] e^{-\lambda\pi|x-y|^2(2-\gamma)}\lambda dy \lambda dx,\\
\end{split}
\end{equation*}
(c) uses Campbell's formula and (d) comes from Lemma \ref{Lemma1}.
\subsection*{Proof of Corollary \ref{CorIM}.}
Let us take $A\in \mathcal{B} \left(\mathbb{R}^2\right)$. We use in (\ref{I1}) the function $f(x)=\mathbbm{1}_{\left\{x\in A\right\}}$, which indicates whether the atom $x$ belongs to $A$ or not. We thus have
\begin{equation*}
\begin{split}
\mathcal{I}^{(1)} & =\sum_{x\in \phi^{(1)}}f(x) \\
& = \sum_{x\in \phi^{(1)}}\mathbbm{1}_{\left\{x\in A\right\}}
\end{split}
\end{equation*}
which counts the number of elements of $\phi^{(1)}$ inside $A$, and, hence, its expected value is $\Phi^{(1)}$'s intensity measure
\begin{equation*}
\begin{split}
\mathbb{E}\left[ \sum_{x\in \Phi^{(1)}}\mathbbm{1}_{\left\{x\in A\right\}}\right] = \mathbb{E} \left[ \Phi^{(1)}(A) \right] = M^{(1)}(A).
\end{split}
\end{equation*}
The righthand side in (\ref{EPhi1}) of Theorem \ref{Expected} is
\begin{equation*}
\begin{split}
\int_{\mathbb{R}^2}f(x) (1-p^*) \lambda dx & = \int_A (1-p^*) \lambda dx, \\
\end{split}
\end{equation*}
and we conclude that
\begin{equation*}
M^{(1)}(dx)=(1-p^*)\lambda dx.
\end{equation*}
For $\Phi^{(2)}$ we consider again the function $g(x,y)=\mathbbm{1}_{\left\{x\in A\right\}}$. Given that, for every $x\in \phi^{(2)}$, $\sum_{y\in \phi^{(2)}\backslash \{x\}} \mathbbm{1}_{\{ x \stackrel{\phi^{(2)}}{\leftrightarrow} y\}} = 1 $, equation (\ref{I2}) takes the form
\begin{equation*}
\begin{split}
\mathcal{I}^{(2)}
& = \sum_{x\in \phi^{(2)}} \mathbbm{1}_{\left\{x\in A\right\}}\sum_{y\in \phi^{(2)}\backslash \{x\}} \mathbbm{1}_{\{ x \stackrel{\phi^{(2)}}{\leftrightarrow} y\}} \\
& = \sum_{x\in \phi^{(2)}} \mathbbm{1}_{\left\{x\in A\right\}}
\end{split}
\end{equation*}
Its expected value is $\Phi^{(2)}$'s intensity measure
\begin{equation*}
\begin{split}
\mathbb{E}\left[ \sum_{x\in \phi^{(2)}} \mathbbm{1}_{\left\{x\in A\right\}}\right] & = \mathbb{E} \left[\Phi^{(2)}(A) \right] = M^{(2)}(A).
\end{split}
\end{equation*}
The righthand side in (\ref{EPhi2}) of Theorem \ref{Expected} is
\begin{eqnarray*}
\begin{split}
& \int_{\mathbb{R}^2} \int_{\mathbb{R}^2} g(x,y)e^{-\lambda \pi |x-y|^2(2-\gamma)}\lambda dy \lambda dx =\nonumber\\
& \int_{A} \int_{\mathbb{R}^2} \mathbbm{1}^{(x)}_Ae^{-\lambda \pi |x-y|^2(2-\gamma)}\lambda dy \lambda dx = \nonumber\\
& \int_{A} \int_{\mathbb{R}^2} e^{-\lambda \pi |x-y|^2(2-\gamma)}\lambda dy \lambda dx = \int_{A} p^* \lambda dx. \nonumber
\end{split}
\end{eqnarray*}
We conclude that
\begin{equation*}
M^{(2)}(dx)=p^*\lambda dx.
\end{equation*}
This result provides an analytical argument of the stationarity of the processes $\Phi^{(1)}$ and $\Phi^{(2)}$ through an explicit formula of their intensity measure and their intensity coefficient. Moreover, using the intensity measure. we can find the average number of points of $\Phi^{(1)}$ or $\Phi^{(2)}$ over any Borel set. This clarifies our discussion at the end of section III.A under Theorem \ref{Percentage}.
\subsection*{Palm Measure for $\Phi^{(2)}$ - rigorous proof}
In this section, $\Phi$ is a stationary point process, with intensity $\lambda>0$, and Palm measure given by $\mathbb{P}^0$. For a realisation $\phi=\{x_n\}$ and a fixed $x\in \mathbb{R}^2$, we denote by $\phi_{x}:=\{x_n+x\}$, the translation of $\phi$ by $x$.
In the previous sections, we have defined the processes $\Phi^{(1)}$ and $\Phi^{(1)}$ only by geometric means and not making use of the probability law that governs $\Phi$. What we have said is that given a realisation $\phi$,
\begin{equation*}
\begin{split}
&\phi^{(1)}=\{x\in \phi \ | \ x \mbox{ is single }\},\\
&\phi^{(2)}=\{x\in \phi \ | \ x \mbox{ cooperates with another element of } \phi\}.
\end{split}
\end{equation*}
Denoting by $\mathbb{M}$ the space of realisations, it is possible to consider
\begin{eqnarray*}
\begin{split}
& \phi \mapsto \phi^{(1)} & & \phi \mapsto \phi^{(2)},
\end{split}
\end{eqnarray*}
as measurable mappings $ \mathbb{M} \rightarrow \mathbb{M}$. Since we use mappings over the space of realisations, we can not say much about the probability laws governing $\Phi^{(1)}$ and $\Phi^{(2)}$, which we denote by $P^{(1)}$ and $P^{(2)}$, respectively. Let us consider the event $\Gamma\in\mathcal{F}$. Each $P^{(i)}$ is a measure
\begin{equation}
\begin{split}
P^{(i)}: & \mathcal{F}\rightarrow [0,1] \\
& \Gamma \rightarrow P^{(i)}(\Gamma)=\mathbb{P}(\Phi^{(i)}\in \Gamma).
\end{split}
\end{equation}
We define $\Gamma^{(i)}\in \mathcal{F}$ as $\Gamma^{(i)}:=\{\phi \ | \ \phi^{(i)}\in \Gamma \}$, therefore,
\begin{equation}
P^{(i)}(\Gamma)=\mathbb{P}\left(\Phi \in \Gamma^{(i)}\right)=\mathbb{E}\left(\mathbbm{1}_{\{\Phi\in \Gamma^{(i)} \}} \right).
\end{equation}
(Let us note here that this last equation gives us a simple way to approximate $P^{(i)}$ using the Monte Carlo method.)
Since $\Phi$ is stationary, the Palm probability of $\Phi$ is defined as follows \cite[p.119]{StoKMbook95}, \cite[p.51,(24)]{BaddNotes07}. For every $A\in \mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^2)$, and every $\hat{\Gamma} \in \mathcal{F}$,
\begin{equation}\label{PalmOr}
\mathbb{E}\sum_{x\in \Phi} \mathbbm{1}_{\{x\in A\}}\mathbbm{1}_{\left\{\Phi_{-x}\in \hat{\Gamma} \right\}}= \lambda \mathcal{S}(A)\mathbb{P}^{0}\left(\hat{\Gamma}\right).
\end{equation}
Using the above definition, we want to find a probability measure $P^{(2),0}:\mathcal{F}\rightarrow [0,1]$ such that, for every $A\in \mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^2)$, and every $\Gamma \in \mathcal{F}$,
\begin{equation}\label{PalmPr}
\mathbb{E}\sum_{x\in \Phi^{(2)}} \mathbbm{1}_{\{x\in A\}}\mathbbm{1}_{\{\Phi^{(2)}_{-x}\in \Gamma\}}= p^* \lambda \mathcal{S}(A)P^{(2),0}(\Gamma).
\end{equation}
(Observe that we use the different events $\Gamma$ and $\hat{\Gamma}$ for reasons that will be clear later in the proof). Let us denote by $\mathcal{A}_0:=\{\phi \ | \mbox{ there exists } y\in \phi \mbox{ such that } 0 \stackrel{\phi}{\leftrightarrow} y \}$. For a given realisation $\phi$, it holds $x\in \phi^{(2)}$ if, and only if, $\phi_{-x} \in \mathcal{A}_0$.
We assume that the Palm measure for $\Phi^{(2)}$ is $P^{(2),0}(\Gamma):=\mathbb{P}^{0}\left( \Gamma^{(2)}\big| \mathcal{A}_0 \right)$ and we want to verify that the measure satisfies (\ref{PalmPr}). Since, $\mathbb{P}^{0}\left(\mathcal{A}_0 \right)=p^*>0$, it is definitely a probability measure. Let us take $A\in \mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^2)$ and $\Gamma \in \mathcal{F}$. We start by the righthand side of (\ref{PalmPr})
\begin{equation*}
\begin{split}
p^*\lambda \mathcal{S}(A)P^{(2),0}(\Gamma) & = p^*\lambda \mathcal{S}(A)\frac{\mathbb{P}^{0}\left( \Gamma^{(2)}, \mathcal{A}_0 \right)}{p^*}\\
& = \lambda \mathcal{S}(A)\mathbb{P}^{0}\left( \Gamma^{(2)}, \mathcal{A}_0 \right)\\
& \stackrel{(a)}{=} \lambda \mathcal{S}(A)\mathbb{P}^{0}\left( \hat{\Gamma} \right)\\
& \stackrel{(\ref{PalmOr})}{=} \mathbb{E}\sum_{x\in \Phi} \mathbbm{1}_{\{x\in A\}}\mathbbm{1}_{\left\{\Phi_{-x}\in \hat{\Gamma} \right\}}\\
& = \mathbb{E}\sum_{x\in \Phi} \mathbbm{1}_{\{x\in A\}}\mathbbm{1}_{\left\{\Phi_{-x}\in \Gamma^{(2)},\mathcal{A}_0 \right\}}\\
& = \mathbb{E}\sum_{x\in \Phi} \mathbbm{1}_{\{x\in A\}}\mathbbm{1}_{\left\{\Phi_{-x}\in \Gamma^{(2)} \right\}}\mathbbm{1}_{\left\{\Phi_{-x}\in\mathcal{A}_0 \right\}} \\
& \stackrel{(b)}{=} \mathbb{E}\sum_{x\in \Phi^{(2)}} \mathbbm{1}_{\{x\in A\}}\mathbbm{1}_{\left\{\Phi_{-x}\in \Gamma^{(2)} \right\}}\\
& \stackrel{(c)}{=} \mathbb{E}\sum_{x\in \Phi^{(2)}} \mathbbm{1}_{\{x\in A\}}\mathbbm{1}_{\left\{ \Phi^{(2)}_{-x} \in \Gamma \right\}}. \\
\end{split}
\end{equation*}
So we reached the lefthand side of (\ref{PalmPr}). In the above, (a) comes by replacing $\hat{\Gamma}:= \left\{\Gamma^{(2)},\mathcal{A}_0\right\}$, (b) because $x\in \phi^{(2)}$ if, and only if $\phi_{-x} \in \mathcal{A}_0$, and (c) because by definition $\phi_{-x}\in\Gamma^{(2)}$ if, and only if $\phi^{(2)}_{-x} \in \Gamma$.
In a similar way, for $P^{(1),0}:\mathcal{F}\rightarrow [0,1]$, and for every $\Gamma\in\mathcal{F}$ we can show, using the same arguments, that $P^{(1),0}(\Gamma):=\mathbb{P}^{0}\left( \Gamma^{(1)}\big| \ \mathcal{B}_0 \right)$ is a Palm measure for $\Phi^{(1)}$.
\bibliographystyle{unsrt}
\footnotesize
|
\section{Introduction}
\lettrine[lines=2]{A}{ir} pollution has raised great concern over the past few decades due to the increasing expansion of industries. It has caused many serious problems, including climate change, loss of biodiversity, changes in hydrological systems, acid rain, and stress on the system of food production \cite{WHO2005}. It is also known that some of the chemical pollutants in the air can increase the occurrence of diseases such as lung cancer and pneumonia \cite{Poschl2005}\cite{Nihal2008}. Since hazardous gases can spread over a very large region and causing huge and irreparable damage \cite{DDLee2001}, there is a growing demand for air pollution monitoring systems.
Many air pollution monitoring systems utilizing smart sensor networks and wireless systems have been proposed in the recent literature \cite{YJJung2008}\cite{MGao2008}. But most of these systems use individually designed facilities to collect and transmit detected data, and the facilities are installed on stationary bases. These systems require a large number of sensors in order to provide a satisfactory coverage of the whole area, rendering them very expensive. To increase the coverage with a limited number of sensors, one can have embedded sensors installed on moving objects, e.g., a vehicle or an animal. With the movement of these objects, a large area can be covered. Since the air pollution condition changes relatively slow and can be regarded as constant in a short period of time, the mobile sensor system can achieve a larger coverage without losing too much accuracy. Most previous work focuses on implementation aspects, e.g. the design of mobile sensor and installation on the bus \cite{FCatineira2008}\cite{FPena2010}. However, no literature has been published concerning the selection of bus routes on which sensors are to be deployed. In this paper, we propose a novel optimization problem solving this selection problem.
To select the bus routes on which sensors are to be deployed so as to minimize the number of sensors required for a satisfactory coverage, we formulate an optimization problem called Bus Sensor Deployment Problem (BSDP). To solve this problem, we employ the Chemical Reaction Optimization (CRO) technique. CRO is a population-based general-purpose optimization metaheuristic which mimics the transition and interaction of molecules in a chemical reaction. In chemical reaction there is a natural tendency for the potential energy of the reactant molecules to decrease until it reaches a stable energy state \cite{AYSLam2012}. CRO utilizes this tendency to guide molecules to explore the solution space and to find the global minimum.
In our model, we assume that the whole area is divided into square grids of the same size and we assume that the air pollution condition in the same grid are similar. The route of a bus are divided into segments according to the boundary of the grids and we consider the mid-point of these segments as the sensing point. When the bus completes its route, the stored data are uploaded wirelessly to the base station at the bus terminus.
The rest of this paper is organized as follows. Section II reviews the related work on air pollution monitoring system. The problem to be solved using CRO is described in Section III, followed by a detailed framework and algorithm design in Section IV. The simulation results are reported and discussed in Section V. Finally we conclude the paper in Section VI.
\section{Related Work}
Air pollution monitoring is a hot research topic due to the increasing concern on the adverse effects of pollution. Kularatna \textit{et al.} proposed an environmental air pollution monitoring system in \cite{Nihal2008} focusing on CO, NO$_{2}$, and SO$_{2}$ detection. The proposed system is based on a smart sensor converter installed with an application processor which can download the pollution condition for further processing. Tsow \textit{et al.} proposed a wearable and wireless sensor system for real-time monitoring of toxic environmental volatile organic compounds in \cite{Tsow2009}. Jung \textit{et al.} proposed an air pollution geo-sensor network to monitor several air pollutants in \cite{YJJung2008}. The system consists of 24 sensors and 10 routers, and provides alarm messages depending on the detected pollutants. Gao \textit{et al.} proposed a wireless mesh network to cover a given geographic area using embedded microprocessors consisting of sensors and wireless communication in \cite{MGao2008}. Kwon \textit{et al.} proposed another outdoor air pollution monitoring system in \cite{JWKwon2007}. This system uses ZigBee networks to transmit the sensed pollutant density levels. The above systems are all air pollution systems utilizing mobile sensors to achieve high coverage, but they all need proprietary equipment to accommodate the movement requirements of the system. Gil-Castineira \textit{et al.} proposed an air pollution detection system based on the public transportation system and tested it in a small scale experiment \cite{FCatineira2008}. However, there is no sensor deployment algorithm that can efficiently utilize the available resources. So in this paper, we formulate an optimization problem to deploy the sensors so as to utilize them efficiently. The optimization problem is solved with CRO.
Many optimization problems have been solved using CRO since \cite{AYSLam2010}. Xu \textit{et al.} used CRO to solve task scheduling problem in grid computing \cite{JXu2011}. This problem is a multi-objective NP-hard optimization problem. Lam \textit{et al.} proposed a population transition problem in P2P live streaming and solved this problem using CRO in \cite{AYSLam2010b}. Lam and Li also solved the cognitive radio spectrum allocation problem in \cite{AYSLam2010c}. Several variants of CRO were proposed to solve the optimization problem and a self-adaptive scheme was used to control the convergence speed of CRO \cite{AYSLam2010c}. Yu \textit{et al.} proposed a CROANN algorithm from real-coded version of CRO \cite{JJQYu2011} to train artificial neural networks (ANNs). CROANN used a novel stopping criteria to prevent the ANNs from being over-trained and the simulation results demonstrated that CROANN outperformed most previously proposed EA-based ANNs training methods as well as some sophisticated heuristic training methods. This shows that CRO has great potential to tackle different optimization problems like BSDP discussed in this paper.
\section{Problem Formulation}
In this paper, we formulate BSDP as a grid coverage problem. The monitoring area $A$ is divided into $p\times q$ grids. There are $n$ bus routes and each bus route $R_{i}, i=1,2,...,n$ passes through multiple grids. If a bus route passes through a grid, then we say this bus route ``covers" the grid. We then define a coverage threshold $c$ such that a grid is ``fully-covered" if it can be covered by $c$ or more routes. A solution $S$ is given by a vector $S=[s_{1}, s_{2}, ..., s_{n}]$, where $s_{i}=1$ means there is a sensor installed on the buses for $R_{i}$ and $s_{i}=0$ means no sensors installed for $R_{i}$. With all the bus routes' sensor-installation information $s_{i}$ collected, we can make a coverage graph $G_{S_{f}}$ where the solution $S_{F}=[1, 1, ..., 1]$ means all bus routes are equipped with sensors, and we define the total number of covered grids in $G_{S_{f}}$ is $t_{S_{f}}$. Then given a random solution $S^{\prime}$ we can compute its coverage graph $G_{S^{\prime}}$ and its covered grid number $t_{S^{\prime}}$. It is natural to assume that the pollutant level in each grid remains constant in a short period of time like one hour \cite{Nihal2008} and we set the sensing interval for each grid to be one hour. Since all buses we use for simulation can finish their routes in this period of time, we consider that there is only one bus with sensor installed running on the same route simultaneously, and the bus can pass all the grids in each sensing interval. Take Fig. 1 as an example. The two black circles are two bus routes. The 28 grids with shading are covered by at least one route. The four grids in the center with darker shading are covered by two routes. So in this example if we set $c=$ 1 or 2, $t_{S_{f}}=$ 28 or 4, respectively. In later calculation we only consider these $t_{S_{f}}$ grids. If we only install sensors on buses running on the left circle, the $t_{S^{\prime}}$ is 16 or 4 with $c=$ 1 or 2. If we desire to have a shorter sensing interval, say $m$ times instead of once per hour, we can deploy sensors on $m$ of the buses on each route, with bus start times of $1/m$ hours apart.
\begin{figure}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth]{fig1.pdf}
\caption{An Example of Problem Instance}
\end{figure}
In this problem we have two major factors to evaluate a solution: the coverage percentage and the total sensor number. The former concerns the performance as well as data accuracy of the system while the latter concerns the expense of deploying the system. Since in different scenarios the system may have different requirements, we introduce a weight coefficient $\alpha$ to balance the two factors. The objective function for BSDP is given as follows:
\begin{equation}
\min\hspace{3mm}(1-\frac{t_{S^{\prime}}}{t_{S_{f}}})\times\alpha + \frac{\sum_{i=1}^{n}s_{i}}{n}\times (1-\alpha).
\end{equation}
This objective function is composed of two parts: the percentage of uncovered grids over the total coverable grids $\frac{t_{S^{\prime}}}{t_{S_{f}}}$ and the percentage of sensor deployment $\frac{\sum_{i=1}^{n}s_{i}}{n}$. In this paper, we adopt $\alpha=0.5$ in our simulations in Section V to simulate a general case that both the coverage and the cost of purchasing sensors are important.
\section{Algorithm Design}
In this section, the detailed design of our algorithm to solve BSDP is given. First we briefly introduce how CRO works, and then the encoding scheme and operators employed for optimization are presented.
\subsection{Chemical Reaction Optimization}
CRO is a kind of variable-population-size-based meta-heuristics that can solve optimization problems efficiently. CRO exploits the natural tendency of chemical reactions to reduce the total potential energy in reactant molecules to search the solution space and to find the global optimum. In a chemical reaction process, the molecules with potential energy (PE) as well as kinetic energy (KE) are put into a closed container. When a collision happens, the molecules will change their structure to transform PE to KE or vice versa, or or just release the energy to the environment. If we consider the energy states of molecules as a surface, this procedure can be considered as molecules rolling down the energy surface to reach the lowest energy state. CRO utilizes this natural tendency to perform optimization.
In CRO, each molecule has a molecular structure $\omega$ and two kinds of energy, i.e. KE and PE. The molecular structure stands for a feasible solution to the problem, PE is the objective function value for the solution, and KE is set as a tolerance for the molecule to move to another energy state with higher energy. We use four different types of elementary reactions to imitate all kinds of molecular collisions, namely, on-wall ineffective collision, decomposition reaction, inter-molecular ineffective collision, and synthesis reaction. The four elementary reactions cooperate with each other to search the minimums while maintaining a wide population diversity.
When CRO algorithm starts, some randomly generated molecules are initially put into a closed container. Then in each iteration one collision takes place in the container. The collision can either be one molecule colliding on the wall, or two molecules colliding with each other. We divide the four different elementary reactions according to the molecules involved in the collision into two categories: uni-molecular collisions and inter-molecular collisions, and we first randomly select one category. The former includes the on-wall ineffective collision and decomposition, while the latter includes the inter-molecular ineffective collision and synthesis. After the reaction category has been decided, the system will randomly select molecule(s) to participate in the chemical reaction. The system then check the energy of the selected molecule(s) to determine which exact elementary reaction shall happen and then the corresponding operator is performed on the involved molecule(s). The final step before the end of each iteration is the performance check. The objective function value(s) of the newly generated molecule(s) is computed and compared with previous value(s). If the new value(s) can satisfy the energy conservation conditions discussed in \cite{AYSLam2010}, the new molecule(s) is accepted and substitutes the original molecules. Otherwise the new molecule(s) is discarded. This completes an iteration of CRO. After the number of iterations reaches a certain number or other stopping criteria is met, the algorithm terminates. Interested readers can refer to \cite{AYSLam2010} and \cite{AYSLam2011} for detailed description of the algorithm as well as its pseudocode.
\subsection{Encoding Scheme}
We use a simple encoding scheme to encode a solution of BSDP. A solution is formulated as a vector of $n$ binary numbers. Each element in the solution stands for whether to install sensors for the specific route or not.
\subsection{Operators}
CRO has four different types of elementary reactions, which correspond to different functionalities. So we design a corresponding operator for each of them. We also design an initial solution generator to generate the solution structures of new molecules. We generate all random numbers uniformly in the given ranges, unless stated otherwise.
\subsubsection{Initial Solution Generator}
This initial solution generator is designed to generate new molecular structures, which is triggered when CRO is initialized or a decomposition happens \cite{AYSLam2010}. We randomly assign 0 or 1 to each element in the vector to generate new molecules. Its pseudocode is given in Algorithm 1 below:
\begin{algorithm}
\caption{\sc{InitialGen} ($\omega$)}
\begin{algorithmic}[1]
\ForAll{Elements $\epsilon$ in $\omega$}
\State Randomly generate a real number $n\in [0,1)$.
\If {$n<0.5$}
\State $\epsilon=0$
\Else
\State $\epsilon=1$
\EndIf
\EndFor
\end{algorithmic}
\end{algorithm}
\subsubsection{Neighborhood Search Operator}
This operator is applied to the two ineffective reactions, namely the on-wall ineffective collision and the inter-molecular ineffective collision. It is designed to generate a new molecular structure $\omega^{\prime}$ from the neighborhood of the given molecular structure $\omega$. Its main purpose is to perform a detailed local search for potentially better solutions \cite{AYSLam2010}. A random-toggle scheme is used to perform this operation. We first randomly pick an element $\epsilon_{i}$ from $\omega$ and then update the value by $\epsilon_{i}=1-\epsilon_{i}$. This operation can efficiently perform a neighborhood search on the solution space without losing accuracy. The pseudocode of this operator is given in Algorithm 2 below:
\begin{algorithm}
\caption{\sc{Ineffective} ($\omega$)}
\begin{algorithmic}[1]
\State Generate a random integer $i$ smaller than the total number of elements in a solution
\State Find the $i^{th}$ element $\epsilon_{i}$ in $\omega$
\State $\epsilon_{i}=1-\epsilon_{i}$
\end{algorithmic}
\end{algorithm}
In an on-wall ineffective collisions, one molecule is involved and this operator can be directly applied to change the molecular structure. However, in an inter-molecular ineffective collision, since two molecules are involved, we separately manipulate them using this operator to perform local search.
\subsubsection{Decomposition}
This operator is used for generating two new molecular structures $\omega_{1}^{\prime}$ and $\omega_{2}^{\prime}$ from the given molecular structure $\omega$. This operator mainly focuses on helping the algorithm to jump out of local minimums \cite{AYSLam2010} by making severe changes with energy sharing. The pseudocode of this operator is given in Algorithm 3 on the next page.
\begin{algorithm}
\caption{\sc{Decomposition} ($\omega$)}
\begin{algorithmic}[1]
\State Copy $\omega$ to $\omega_{1}^{\prime}$ and $\omega_{2}^{\prime}$
\ForAll{Elements $\epsilon$ in $\omega_{1}^{\prime}$'s and $\omega_{2}^{\prime}$'s molecular structure}
\State Randomly generate a real number $n\in [0,1)$.
\If {$n<0.5$}
\State $\epsilon=1-\epsilon$
\EndIf
\EndFor
\end{algorithmic}
\end{algorithm}
The original molecule is copied to two new molecules and each element in the new molecular structure is individually toggled with a probability of 0.5. If this operation can satisfy the energy balance rule mentioned in \cite{AYSLam2010} then this reaction is accepted, i.e. the original molecule is discarded and the two new molecules are put into the container.
\subsubsection{Synthesis}
This operator is used for generating one new molecular structure $\omega^{\prime}$ from two given molecular structure $\omega_{1}$ and $\omega_{2}$. This operator can perform a general local search while preventing the molecules from being stuck in the local minimums \cite{AYSLam2010}. The pseudocode of this operator is given in Algorithm 4 below:
\begin{algorithm}
\caption{\sc{Synthesis} ($\omega_{1}$, $\omega_{2}$)}
\begin{algorithmic}[1]
\ForAll{Elements $\epsilon$ in $\omega^{\prime}$'s molecular structure}
\State Randomly generate a real number $n\in [0,1)$.
\If{$r>0.5$}
\State $\epsilon=$counterpart in $\omega_{1}$
\Else
\State $\epsilon=$counterpart in $\omega_{2}$
\EndIf
\EndFor
\end{algorithmic}
\end{algorithm}
In this operator, the new molecule is composed of the two given original molecules and each element of the solution is equally likely to be selected from each of the original molecules.
\begin{table*}
\caption{Analysis on Performance for Different CRO Parameters}
\small
\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{rlll||rlll||rlll}
\hline\hline
\multicolumn{4}{c||}{EnBuff} & \multicolumn{4}{c||}{IniKE} & \multicolumn{4}{c}{CollRate} \\ \hline
Value & Mean & Std. & Best & Value & Mean & Std. & Best & Value & Mean & Std. & Best \\ \hline\hline
0 & 0.423302 & 0.0863343 & 0.398626 & 0 & 0.428764 & 0.11517 & 0.387637 & 0.1 & 0.429088 & 0.0929551 & 0.398626 \\
10 & 0.422423 & 0.102802 & 0.395604 & 10 & 0.430577 & 0.158681 & 0.387637 & 0.2 & 0.429736 & 0.111531 & 0.387637 \\
100 & 0.423159 & 0.0828353 & 0.395604 & 100 & 0.425835 & 0.111766 & 0.395604 & \bf{0.4} & 0.428396 & 0.0933636 & 0.401648 \\
1000 & 0.428346 & 0.0879891 & 0.398626 & 1000 & 0.427692 & 0.112578 & 0.398626 & 0.6 & 0.43139 & 0.0969814 & 0.409615 \\
\bf{5000} & 0.428121 & 0.0823935 & 0.40467 & \bf{5000} & 0.427286 & 0.102947 & 0.387637 & 0.8 & 0.426929 & 0.0986975 & 0.398626 \\
10000 & 0.423099 & 0.0932018 & 0.37967 & 10000 & 0.431253 & 0.108105 & 0.398626 & 0.9 & 0.430945 & 0.108942 & 0.398626 \\ \hline\hline
\multicolumn{4}{c||}{LossRate} & \multicolumn{4}{c||}{DecThres} & \multicolumn{4}{c}{SynThres} \\ \hline
Value & Mean & Std. & Best & Value & Mean & Std. & Best & Value & Mean & Std. & Best \\ \hline\hline
0.1 & 0.432907 & 0.125838 & 0.398626 & 100 & 0.450401 & 0.147143 & 0.409615 & 10 & 0.411236 & 0.0971248 & 0.376648 \\
0.2 & 0.43133 & 0.127488 & 0.384615 & \bf{300} & 0.409709 & 0.091254 & 0.37967 & 50 & 0.413066 & 0.0835925 & 0.384615 \\
0.4 & 0.423527 & 0.109854 & 0.387637 & 500 & 0.413154 & 0.0904357 & 0.387637 & \bf{100} & 0.406973 & 0.0803982 & 0.387637 \\
0.6 & 0.414357 & 0.0957439 & 0.384615 & 1000 & 0.410253 & 0.0943316 & 0.376648 & 300 & 0.410703 & 0.094436 & 0.376648 \\
\bf{0.8} & 0.410626 & 0.0908277 & 0.376648 & 3000 & 0.419896 & 0.121163 & 0.37967 & 500 & 0.41239 & 0.0972623 & 0.387637 \\
0.9 & 0.422995 & 0.093694 & 0.387637 & 5000 & 0.427819 & 0.210808 & 0.376648 & 1000 & 0.411368 & 0.0983823 & 0.387637 \\ \hline\hline
\end{tabular}
\end{center}
\end{table*}
\section{Simulation Results}
In this section we will first introduce the data used for simulation of BSDP. Then the detailed simulation parameter settings, results, and comparisons are presented.
\subsection{Simulation Data}
In order to make the simulation results persuasive, we utilize the real data of the Hong Kong Island bus routes in the simulation. We selected 91 bus routes from the Citybus transportation system \cite{CityBus2011} which covers most of the accessible areas on Hong Kong Island. There are totally 2277 stations for the 91 bus routes and for simplicity, but without losing generality, adjacent stations on the same routes are directly connected and buses are supposed to run on the connected graph. The plot of all routes is given in Fig. 2.
\begin{figure}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth]{fig2.pdf}
\caption{Grids and 91 Selected Routes for Simulation and}
\end{figure}
The whole area is divided into $16\times11=176$ $1km\times1km$ grids. For different coverage threshold $c$ we have different $t_{S_{f}}$. For instance, if $c=5$ then $t_{S_{f}}=40$. The reason why $t_{S_{f}}$ cannot reach 176 is that there are no bus routes passing through some rural grids.
\subsection{Analysis of CRO parameters selection}
The performance of CRO is greatly influenced by the proper selection of the optimization parameters \cite{JJQYu2011}. The ratio of occurrence of different reactions, the tolerance of molecules to jump to a high energy state and the energy consumption rate are all key factors that drive significant impact on the quality of the final solutions. So it is essential to analyze and select a proper combination of parameters for the simulation. In this analysis, we use the Hong Kong Island bus route data and set $c=5$. The results of testing the parameters are generated by computing the average of 50 trials with 10 000 function evaluations. Here are brief introductions to the six parameters and interested reader can refer to \cite{AYSLam2010} and \cite{AYSLam2011} for more information.
\subsubsection{EnBuff}
This parameter describes the initial energy buffer size of the container. When the algorithm iterates, this energy can be transfered from and to the molecules' PE or KE.
\subsubsection{IniKE}
This parameter describes the initial kinetic energy each molecule holds. It decides the tolerance of accepting bad molecules.
\subsubsection{CollRate}
This parameter describes the fraction of an elementary reactions being an inter-molecular collision. It functions when an iteration starts and decide the category of reactions for this iteration. The larger this parameter is, the larger possibility that inter-molecular collision will happen.
\subsubsection{LossRate}
This parameter describes the energy loss rate when an on-wall ineffective collision happens.
\subsubsection{DecThres}
This parameter describes a threshold for decomposition reaction. This parameter was named ``alpha" in \cite{AYSLam2010}. When the iteration is decided to be a uni-molecular collision, the algorithm will decide whether the decomposition reaction shall be conducted or not by using this parameter.
\subsubsection{SynThres}
Similar to DecThres, this parameter describes the happening threshold for synthesis reaction. This parameter was named ``beta" in \cite{AYSLam2010} and operates when inter-molecular collision is selected.
From the analysis results listed in Table I we can see that although the performance of the simulation can stay at a relatively high level, proper parameters can improve the final performance in a small scale. So we select a combination of parameters whose performance in mean result as well as the standard derivation is relative good. The proper combination for simulation is listed in Table II.
\begin{table}
\caption{CRO Parameters}
\small
\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{r||l}
\hline\hline
Parameters & Values \\ \hline
Function Evaluation Limit & 10 000\\
Initial Population Size & 20 \\
Initial Energy Buffer Size & 5000 \\
Initial Molecular Kinetic Energy & 5000 \\
Molecular Collision Rate & 0.4 \\
Kinetic Energy Loss Rate & 0.8 \\
Decomposition Threshold & 300 \\
Synthesis Threshold & 100 \\ \hline\hline
\end{tabular}
\end{center}
\end{table}
\begin{table*}
\caption{Analysis of the Impact of $c$ on the Results}
\small
\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{r||lll|cl|ll|lc}
\hline\hline
\multirow{2}{*}{$c$} & \multicolumn{3}{c|}{Objective Function Result} & \multicolumn{2}{c|}{Full-coverage Result} & \multicolumn{2}{c|}{Average Result} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Best Result} \\ \cline{2-10}
& Mean & Std. & Best & Covered Grids & Percentage & Coverage & Routes Count & Coverage & Routes Count \\ \hline
1 & 0.153231 & 0.0291638 & 0.142857 & 65 & 36.9318\% & 99.7538\% & 13.72 & 100.000\% & 13 \\
2 & 0.215108 & 0.0434328 & 0.201872 & 54 & 30.6818\% & 97.8889\% & 17.70 & 96.2963\% & 15 \\
3 & 0.278838 & 0.0556753 &0.262166 & 49 & 27.8409\% & 97.9184\% & 23.48 & 97.9592\% & 22 \\
4 & 0.359091 & 0.0953412 & 0.329670 & 44 & 25.0000\% & 98.0909\% & 30.94 & 100.000\% & 30 \\
5 & 0.410451 & 0.0836293 & 0.387637 & 40 & 22.7273\% & 95.9000\% & 33.62 & 97.5000\% & 33 \\
6 & 0.482267 & 0.1541760& 0.452574 & 38 & 21.5909\% & 91.1579\% & 35.84 & 92.1053\% & 34 \\
\hline\hline
\end{tabular}
\end{center}
\end{table*}
\begin{table*}
\caption{Comparison among CRO, SRM, and SGA}
\small
\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{r||lll|lll|lll}
\hline\hline
\multirow{2}{*}{$c$} & \multicolumn{3}{c|}{CRO Result} & \multicolumn{3}{c|}{SRM Result} & \multicolumn{3}{c}{SGA Result} \\ \cline{2-10}
& Mean & Std. & Best & Mean & Std. & Best & Mean & Std. & Best \\ \hline
1 & \textbf{0.153231} & 0.0291638 & 0.142857 & 0.401363 & 0.119488 & 0.389011 & 0.40633 & 0.150758 & 0.323077 \\
2 & \textbf{0.215108} & 0.0434328 & 0.201872 & 0.450981 & 0.113744 & 0.455230 & 0.455551 & 0.136338 & 0.407204 \\
3 & \textbf{0.278838} & 0.0556753 &0.262166 & 0.508006 & 0.104393 & 0.475667 & 0.522512 & 0.127871 & 0.459969 \\
4 & \textbf{0.359091} & 0.0953412 & 0.329670 & 0.55979 & 0.095316 & 0.563437 & 0.567597 & 0.084297 & 0.53047 \\
5 & \textbf{0.410451} & 0.0836293 & 0.387637 & 0.587005 & 0.110423 & 0.575549 & 0.599115 & 0.107698 & 0.561538 \\
6 & \textbf{0.482267} & 0.1541760& 0.452574 & 0.668028 & 0.129847 & 0.663389 & 0.670804 & 0.132876 & 0.621747 \\
\hline\hline
\end{tabular}
\end{center}
\end{table*}
\subsection{Analysis on the Impact of $c$ to Result}
To analyze the impact of $c$ on the BSDP optimization result, we adopt different values of $c$ and perform simulations using the previously stated parameter combination. The results are listed in Table III and are generated by computing the average of 50 trials with 10 000 function evaluations.
In Table III, the first column ``Objective Function Result" presents the raw data obtained from the objective function listed in Section III. The ``Full-coverage Result" column presents $t_{S_{f}}$ described in Section III, with respect to different value of $c$. If the covered grid count is high, then the largest possible cover percentage over the whole area is also high. Since in the Hong Kong Island data there are many grids uncovered (because of no inhabitation or sea area), the percentages are relatively low. The ``Average Result" presents the mature data of the average value of the 50 best result generated from the trials. The ``Best Result" presents the mature data for the best-performing result from the 50 best result.
The selection of $c$ has a large impact on the final result. Since $c$ defines the coverage threshold, a larger $c$ will result in more buses passing through a grid. However the total number of bus routes is a fixed number, and in some remote area it is possible that there are totally less than $c$ bus routes. On the contrary, a smaller $c$ can result in a possibly higher coverage rate, the collected data accuracy is less. So the selection of $c$ shall be decided by the real-world requirement of the system.
\subsection{Comparison among Chemical Reaction Optimization, A Random Method, and Simple Genetic Algorithm}
We compare the performance of CRO with a greedy approach called Simple Random Method (SRM), and with Simple Genetic Algorithm (SGA). SRM generates 10 000 random solutions and stores the best-so-far solution. For each element in the solution SRM will perform the randomization elaborated below. First we generate a random number $n\in [0,1)$ as ``base", then we generate another random number $m\in [0,1)$ independently as ``target". If $m>n$ then this element is set to 1; otherwise, the element is set to 0. The reason why we generate two random numbers instead of one for randomization is that we cannot set a fixed threshold controlling the ratio between sensor-equipped routes and other routes. But with this double-randomization technique, the elements are individually generated and all have different probabilities of being 1. The pseudocode of SRM is given in Algorithm 5 below:
\begin{algorithm}
\caption{\sc{SRM}}
\begin{algorithmic}[1]
\State Set $GlobalMin$ to be a large number
\While{Function evaluation count is not exhausted}
\State Initiate a new solution $s$
\ForAll{Elements $\epsilon$ in $s$}
\State Randomly generate a real number $n\in [0,1)$.
\State Randomly generate another real number $m\in [0,1)$.
\If{$m>n$}
\State $\epsilon=1$
\Else
\State $\epsilon=0$
\EndIf
\EndFor
\If{The objective function value of $s$ is smaller than $GlobalMin$}
\State $GlobalMin=$ objective function value of $s$
\EndIf
\EndWhile
\end{algorithmic}
\end{algorithm}
We follow \cite{CJ2012} to program SGA and we adopt the crossover rate as 0.5 and permutation rate as 0.1 for this simulation. For all three algorithms, we set the function evaluation limits to 10 000. Since the parameter $c$ shall be decided by the real-world requirement, we compare the performance of CRO, SRM and SGA with $c \in \{1,2,3,4,5,6\}$, respectively. All the simulation results are presented in Table IV.
From Table IV, we can see that CRO can outperform SRM and SGA dramatically with different values of $c$ for the mean, the standard deviation and the best result. This shows that CRO is an efficient way in solving BDSP optimization problem.
\section{Conclusion and Future Work}
In this paper, we propose a novel air pollution monitoring system by deploying sensors in a public transportation system. We also formulate a new optimization problem for selecting the buses to deploy the sensors, called BSDP. The main idea is to install sensors on buses and with the movement of the buses, the sensors can cover a much larger area compared with stationary sensor stations. This raises the problem of selecting buses to install sensors. We use CRO to solve this optimization problem since CRO has been shown to be powerful in optimizing similar problems \cite{AYSLam2010}\cite{JJQYu2011}. In our simulation, we use the Hong Kong island bus route data to analyze the impact of different parameters on the final result of BSDP optimization. CRO is also compared with SGA and a greedy method, SRM. Simulation results show that the proper selection of $c$ has great impact on the final optimization result, namely, the total number of sensors needed, the area coverage percentage, as well as the data accuracy. Meanwhile CRO can outperform SGA and SRM with different values of $c$, in both average quality of solutions and the best generated solution.
In the future we will conduct a systematic analysis on the variance of the different parameters and perform Student's t-test on the variance. Then we will try to use metaheuristics other than CRO and SGA to see which metaheuristic is the most effective in solving BSDP. Moreover, the paper can be further extended in several ways. One possible extension is to have different number of sensors installed on different routes to reduce the sensing interval and increase the accuracy. Another is to set different coverage thresholds for different grids (regions) to reflect the different time constants for pollutant level changes. We will also deploy the sensors on a real transportation system for real-world testing.
\section*{Acknowledgement}
This work is supported in part by the Initiative on Clean Energy and Environment of The University of Hong Kong. A.Y.S. Lam is also supported in part by the Croucher Foundation Research Fellowship.
|
\section{Introduction}
Contemporary physics is notoriously hostile to an A-theoretic metaphysics of time. A recent approach to quantum gravity promises to reverse that verdict: advocates of causal set theory (CST) have argued that their framework is consistent with a fundamental notion of `becoming'. A causal set, or `causet', is a discrete set of events partially ordered by a relation of causality. The idea is that these sets `grow' as new events are added one by one to the future of already existing ones; furthermore, this `birthing' process is said to unfold in a `generally covariant' manner and hence in a way that is perfectly compatible with relativity. Here is Rafael Sorkin (2006) advertising the philosophical pay-off:
\begin{quote}
One often hears that the principle of general covariance [...] forces us to abandon `becoming' [...]. To this claim, the CSG dynamics provides a counterexample. It refutes the claim because it offers us an active process of growth in which `things really happen', but at the same time it honors general covariance. In doing so, it shows how the `Now' might be restored to physics without paying the price of a return to the absolute simultaneity of pre-relativistic days.
\end{quote}
The claim is that CST, or at least CST augmented with a dynamics such as classical sequential growth (CSG) dynamics, rescues temporal becoming and our intuitive notion of time from relativity. The claim is routinely made in the pertinent physics literature, and has even found its way into popular science magazines.\footnote{Cf.\ e.g.\ Dowker (2003, 38).} One might not believe that our intuitive notion of time needs or deserves rescuing, but there is no denying that if this claim is correct it would have significant consequences for the philosophy of time. Specifically, it may underwrite a `growing block' model of the metaphysics of time, as John Earman (2008) has speculated.
This paper has two main themes, one concerned with kinematics and the other with dynamics. After presenting the basics of CST in the next section, we investigate the possibilities for becoming in the theory's kinematics in Section 3. We show that Stein's becoming theorem in relativity is false in CST and try, in vain, to use the resulting freedom to escape a dilemma imposed on becoming by relativity. Then, in Section 4, we turn to the CST dynamics in search of a more robust notion of becoming. Trying to square this sense of becoming with (discrete) general covariance has many costs. However, we show that if one is willing to pay them, a novel and exotic form of becoming is compatible with relativity. Conclusions follow in Section 5.
\section{The basics of CST}
The guiding idea of CST is that the fundamental structure of the world consists of a discrete set of elementary events partially ordered by a relation that is essentially causal. The theory finds its inspiration in a theorem (Malament 1977) that shows the precise sense in which the causal ordering of a sufficiently well-behaved relativistic spacetime determines its geometry, up to a conformal factor. Paraphrased roughly, the causal order of spacetime contains all the information we care about except for the local scale or `size' of spacetime. Motivated by this result, Sorkin and others formulated an approach to quantum gravity wherein discrete events supply the scale information and causal relations supply the rest. Quantum versions are being developed, but we will focus on the classical theory.
The basic structure of the theory is the {\em causet} $\mathcal{C}$, i.e., an ordered pair $\langle C, \preceq\rangle$ consisting of a set $C$ of otherwise featureless events and a relation `$\preceq$' on $C$ which satisfies the following conditions:
\begin{enumerate}
\item $\preceq$ induces a partial order on $C$, i.e., it is a reflexive, antisymmetric, and transitive relation;
\item local finitude, i.e., $\forall x,z \in C, \mbox{card}(\{y \in C| x\preceq y \preceq z\}) <\infty$.\footnote{More colloquially, the cardinality of all these sets has to be less than $\aleph_0$.}
\end{enumerate}
These simple conditions constitute the basic kinematic assumptions of CST. The demanded antisymmetry entails that the structure cannot contain the causal-set equivalent of closed timelike curves. The local finitude of causets means that they are discrete structures, and this discreteness is what leads to some relevant differences concerning the issue of becoming in relativity.
If what at larger scales looks like a relativistic spacetime fundamentally is a causal set, then causal set theory must give an account of how relativistic spacetimes emerge from causal sets. But just how do relativistic spacetimes emerge from causal sets? On the standard way of conceptualizing the problem, a necessary condition for the emergence of relativistic spacetimes from causal sets is that the spacetimes appropriately approximates the fundamental causal set at the scales at which it offers an adequate description. A classical spacetime $\langle \mathcal{M}, g_{ab}\rangle$ is said to {\em faithfully approximate} a causal set $\langle C, \preceq\rangle$ just in case there is an injective function $\phi: C \rightarrow \mathcal{M}$ such that
\begin{enumerate}
\item the causal relations are preserved, i.e.\ $\forall x, y\in C, x \preceq y$ iff $\phi(x) \in J^-(\phi(y))$, where $J^-(X)$ designates the causal past of the set $X$ of events in $\mathcal{M}$;
\item on average, $\phi$ maps one element of $C$ onto each Planck-sized volume of $\langle \mathcal{M}, g_{ab}\rangle$ (Smolin 2006, 210);
\item and $\langle \mathcal{M}, g_{ab}\rangle$ does not have `structure' at scales below the mean point spacing.
\end{enumerate}
The first condition demands that the causet's causal relations are preserved on the emergent level of the relativistic spacetime. The second condition fixes the local scale. The third condition captures the idea that a discrete structure should not give rise to an emerging spacetime with significant curvature at a scale finer than that of the fundamental structure. Of course, this demand fixes the fundamental scale; in CST, it is common to fix it to the scale of Planck volumes.
Such an injective function can easily be found if we simply let the co-domain of $\phi$ to be determined by a random `Poisson sprinkling' of events onto $\mathcal{M}$. Given such a co-domain of $\phi$ in $\mathcal{M}$, we obtain a causal set satisfying the kinematic axiom by lifting the set of events together with all the relations of causal precedence obtaining among these events. It is thus straightforward to find a causal set that is approximated by a given globally hyperbolic spacetime with bounded curvature.
Note that it is important that the selected events in $\mathcal{M}$ are picked randomly and do not form some regular pattern such as a lattice. If the set of events exhibits too much regularity, then Lorentz symmetry would be broken because we would be able to distinguish, at an appropriately coarse-grained scale, such a lattice from its Lorentz boosted analogue. Since there can be no such observable differences, the selection of events must be sufficiently random and irregular (Dowker et al.\ 2004).
It turns out that most causal sets sanctioned merely by the kinematic axiom do not stand in a relation of faithful approximation to spacetimes with low-dimensional manifolds. Thus, the vast majority of causal sets are not approximated by a relativistic spacetime. This is the so-called `inverse problem' or `entropy crisis' of causal set theory (Smolin 2006). Only if this difficulty is successfully solved can causal set theory become a viable approach to finding a quantum theory of gravity.
Most efforts in causal set theory are thus directed at this issue. An obvious strategy to address the problem is to identify further conditions that a causal set must satisfy in order to be an acceptable model of a fundamental structure. The idea, then, is to formulate some additional axioms that appropriately restrict the permissible causal sets to just include mostly only those that can be faithfully approximated by a relativistic spacetime. These additional principles are thought to specify a `dynamics' and thus to select the dynamical, and hence physical, models of the theory among its kinematic models that merely satisfy the basic axiom. Before we get to the dynamics, let us turn our attention to (kinematical) causal sets and the possibilities they offer for an advocate of becoming.
\section{Facing the same dilemma?}
Is temporal becoming compatible with special relativity? Howard Stein (1991) famously proved that there is a sense of becoming compatible with Minkowski spacetime. The reason for this is simply that the events of Minkowski spacetime $\langle \mathbb{R}^4, \eta_{ab}\rangle$ can be partitioned into past, present, and future in a way that respects the geometric structure of Minkowski spacetime. However, as we have stressed (Callender 2000 and W\"uthrich 2013), just to identify {\em some} partition of events in Minkowski spacetime and to call it `becoming' does not entirely remove the pressure on becoming from special relativity. What is addtionally required is a reason to regard that choice of partition as answering the A-theorist's plea to identify in the fundamental layer of reality what in her view is required to ground our temporal experience. Focusing on the present, the worry is that any identification of a present in special relativity either answers to the presentist's explanatory request or is compatible with the structure of Minkowski spacetime, {\em but not both}. For example, one might introduce a foliation of spacetime into spacelike hypersurfaces totally ordered by `time'. Presumably, that would complement a presentist notion of a (spatially extended) present and of becoming, but at the price of introducing structure not invariant under automorphisms of Minkowski spacetime and hence arguably violating special relativity. Conversely, the present can be identified with invariant structures such as a single event or the surface of an event's past lightcone, and successive presents as a set of events on a worldline or as a set of past lightcones totally ordered by inclusion, respectively, but such structures will have radically different properties from those ordinarily attributed to the present by those seeking to save it (see Callender 2000 and W\"uthrich 2013)---e.g.\ if we take the past lightcone as the present, then the big bang counts, counterintuitively, as `now'. Does the advocate of becoming face a similar dilemma in the context of CST?
In order to address that question, let us see whether we can construct a `present' from the resources of CST. Beginning with the event of the `here-now', one very natural definition of the events co-present with the `here-now' are those events on a `spacelike slice', technically a `maximal antichain', i.e., a maximal set of events such that any two events are incomparable in terms of the relation $\preceq$. A sequence of presents would then be a partition of a causet into such maximal antichains. There are a number of problems with a present thus defined. First, maximal antichains, by definition, do not have any structure. If such a `spatially extended' present were to have any spatial structure at all, then this structure must somehow be induced by, and thus be ontologically dependent upon, the larger---`temporally extended'---structure of the causal set. Second, for any given event `here-now', there are in general many maximal antichains of which it is an element. Thus, in a loose analogy to the many ways in which Minkowski spacetime can be foliated, the present in the sense of the set of events co-present with the here-now would thus not be uniquely defined. Third, and relatedly, a partition of a causal set into such maximal antichains would not be invariant under automorphisms of its structure. Thus, it seems that a `spatially extended' present in a causal set would very much run into difficulties of the sort encountered in special relativity.
Let's probe deeper. In special relativity, Stein's theorem tells us, essentially, that any binary relation `is definite as of' adapted to the structure of temporally oriented Minkowski spacetime must coincide with `is in the causal past of' lest it degenerate into the trivial or the universal relation, modulo a choice of temporal direction.\footnote{A universal binary relation obtains between any two objects in the domain, while a trivial binary relation only obtains between any object and itself. Since, given a domain, all trivial relations are extensionally identical (and hence extensionally identical to `identity', the most important trivial relation), as are all universal relations, we use the definite article in both cases.} One might now expect that a statement analogous to Stein's theorem holds in CST as well. After all, there is an obvious sense in which the causal structure of causal sets is very much like that of Minkowski spacetime---indeed, CST is premised upon the idea that special relativity gets the causal structure of spacetimes as partial orderings among events basically right. Thus, it may appear as if a causal set is merely a discrete version of Minkowski spacetime. This expectation, as natural as it may be, is disappointed.
Stein's notion of becoming is expressed as a binary relation $R$ between spacetime events. The relation $R$ can be interpreted as `is settled as of', `having become as of', or `is determinate as of' and similar notions. Imposing various conditions on becoming, Stein proves that a non-boring relation that respects the basic structure of Minkowski spacetime exists. It turns out to be the relation that obtains between and only between an event and events in that event's causal past. In particular, he assumes that $R$ is a reflexive, non-trivial, and non-universal relation on a Minkowski spacetime $\langle\mathbb{R}^n, \eta_{ab}\rangle$ of at least two dimensions $(n\geq2)$ invariant under automorphisms that preserve the time-orientation and generally is Lorentz covariant. Stein then shows that if $Rab$ holds for some ordered pair of points $\langle a, b\rangle$, with $a, b \in \mathbb{R}^n$, such that $ab$ is a past-pointing (timelike or null) vector, then for any pair of points $\langle x, y\rangle$ in $\mathbb{R}^n$, $Rxy$ holds if and only if $xy$ is a past-pointing vector. The upshot is that for any event $p$ in Minkowski spacetime, all the events in $p$'s causal past have become for it.
The analogue of this theorem, however, is straightforwardly false in CST. To quickly see this, consider the simple causet in Figure \ref{fig:counterexample}---the `counterexample causet'.\footnote{In the figure, we follow the usual practice of not including edges implied by reflexivity and transitivity.}
\begin{figure}
\centering
\epsfig{figure=counterexample,width=0.2\linewidth}
\caption{\label{fig:counterexample} The counterexample causet.}
\end{figure}
On this causet, a reflexive and transitive relation $R$ can be defined (set-theoretically, as is standard) as follows:
\begin{equation*}
R = \{\langle a,a\rangle, \langle b,b\rangle, \langle c,c\rangle, \langle d,d\rangle, \langle b,a\rangle, \langle c,a\rangle, \langle d,b\rangle, \langle d,c\rangle, \langle d,a\rangle, \langle b,c\rangle, \langle c,b\rangle\}.
\end{equation*}
In other words, this relation $R$---`is definite as of'---holds of any event and itself, of any event and any other event in its causal past, and of any `spacelike related' pairs of events such as $b$ and $c$ in Figure \ref{fig:counterexample}, and not otherwise. It is clear that this relation does not obtain only between events and events in their causal past, as it obtains between the spacelike related events $b$ and $c$! Nor is this $R$ the trivial reflexive relation or the universal relation (e.g.\ $\langle b,d\rangle$ is not an element). Nonetheless $R$ is invariant under automorphisms of the structure, as it only relies on the causal relations themselves, except for the last two pairs, which are however symmetrically included and obtain between points with identical `relational profiles' and hence are invariant under structure-preserving maps. In fact, we would expect to find relations violating the analogue of Stein's theorem whenever we have `non-Hegelian pairs' of events, i.e.\ pairs of events whose relational profile is identical. Automorphisms of a causal set map events to events in the causal set such that if a pair of events was standing in a relation of causal precedence prior to the mapping, their image will also do so.\footnote{Although the counterexample causet does admittedly not give rise to a relativistic spacetime, it could be a small proper part of a much larger causet that can be faithfully embedded into a relativistic spacetime. Toward the end of this section, we will return to the issue of how relevant and generic the counterexample is.} Of course, one may take this very fact to indicate that non-Hegelian pairs are not physically distinct events.
Specifically for the counterexample causet, the pairs $\langle b,c\rangle$ and $\langle c,b\rangle$ can be included in $R$ without $R$ collapsing into the universal relation, as happens in Minkowski spacetime. There, whenever a spacelike vector is included in $R$, invariance under automorphisms demands that {\em all} spacelike vectors are in $R$; requiring transitivity then collapses $R$ to the universal relation. This does not happen in cases such as the one represented in Figure \ref{fig:counterexample} because events with identical causal profile can be mapped onto each other without altering the causal structure at all. Thus, we see that in CST there can be non-trivial and non-universal relations of `being definite as of' that do not collapse to events in the causal past of the reference event. This gives the A-theorist novel ways of constructing physically kosher fundamental relations of co-presentness. But is it enough to drive a wedge into the dilemma faced by advocates of relativistic becoming?
Let us have a closer look at non-Hegelian subsets. A {\em non-Hegelian subset} $H\subseteq C$ of events in a causal set $\langle C, \preceq\rangle$ is a set consisting of distinct events $x_1,...,x_k$ in $C$ with the same relational profile, i.e., $\{x_1,...,x_k | \forall x_i, x_j, \forall z\in C \mbox{ such that } z \neq x_{i} \mbox{ and } z \neq x_{j}, \neg (x_i \preceq x_j) \mbox{ and } z\preceq x_i \leftrightarrow z\preceq x_j \mbox{ and } x_i\preceq z \leftrightarrow x_j \preceq z, \mbox{ where } i, j=1,...,k\}$.\footnote{Singleton sets of events are ruled out by the stipulation that any events in a non-Hegelian subset are pairwise unrelated by the ordering. Thus, $1<k\leq n$ for a causal set of $n$ events if there are any non-Hegelian subsets. The stipulation also implies that a non-Hegelian subset is an antichain, hence underwriting the following last sentence in the paragraph.} It is clear that any pair of distinct elements of a non-Hegelian subset cannot stand in the relation $\preceq$, i.e., they are by necessity `spacelike' to one another.
Now suppose we have a causal set with a non-Hegelian pair, i.e., a non-Hegelian subset of cardinality 2. The relation $R$ can thus symmetrically obtain between them in a way that leaves $R$ automorphically invariant, which is what led to the violation of Stein's result transposed to CST. If we subtract from $R$ all pairs which stand in $\preceq$, then we will end up with the non-Hegelian subsets. Since their elements stand in $R$ symmetrically, these will be events which can be interpreted to be `determinate as of' one another. In this sense $R \;\setminus \preceq$ gives us an automorphically invariant way to define co-presentness. And this in a theory which is supposed to ground relativity and whose only fundamental relation is relativistic causal precedence!
Do we now have a tool allowing us to thwart the original dilemma between answering the presentist's explanatory needs and compatibility with relativity? For that to work, we would have to find large non-Hegelian subsets consisting of a nearly maximal antichain for the present to be at least almost global, and we would need many of them to have a decent sequence of subsequent presents.
However, this is not what we generically find in causal sets.\footnote{`Generic' once the Kleitman-Rothschild hordes have been contained.} Although we know of almost no pertinent analytical results or numerical estimates, we suspect that large and many non-Hegelian subsets are few and far between.\footnote{An exception is an unpublished result found by David Meyer: the expected number of non-Hegelian pairs for a causet obtained from $N$ samples of a uniform process in an Alexandrov neighbourhood of $(1+1)$-dimensional Minkowski spacetime is 1 in the limit as $N$ goes to infinity. Since larger non-Hegelian subsets would contain more non-Hegelian pairs, their expected number would presumably be smaller and quickly tend to zero in the limit as the non-Hegelian subset grows.} The reason is that there are many more irregular structures that satisfy the kinematic axiom than there are structures which are sufficiently regular to sustain large and many non-Hegelian subsets. If this is right, then there are no grounds on which to expect that the few and small remaining non-Hegelian subsets can generically give rise to any macroscopic present.
What about those causal sets which do have large and many non-Hegelian subsets and thus satisfy the condition necessary for an evasion of the dilemma? They clearly satisfy the kinematic axiom, so are not ruled out unless we impose additional dynamical laws that they violate. Yet observe that in these rare circumstances where the necessary condition is satisfied, we have regular `lattice' structures. As explained above, such highly regular structures would lead to a detectable violation of Lorentz symmetry. This has the great virtue of making it empirically testable whether---if CST is true at all, of course---the fundamental causal set exhibits such regularities. We take the absence of any empirical tests pointing to a violation of Lorentz symmetry (Mattingly 2005) to be an indication that the actual fundamental causal set---again, if any---cannot be highly regular.
In sum, rather than escape the dilemma, it seems CST embraces it and even makes it rigorous. That is, generically there will not be non-Hegelian subsets sufficient to express the present, and when there are, they will violate Lorentz invariance.
Of course, an advocate of becoming happy with Stein's relation can easily find a counterpart within causal sets. This would make becoming more local and observer-dependent, just as the Stein relations based on the causal structure of Minkowski spacetime are.\footnote{Clifton and Hogarth's (1995) similar view is an instance of observer-dependent becoming.} Given the structure of causets, it is straightforward to define relativistically kosher forms of becoming that essentially imitate the past lightcone becoming already compatible with the geometry of Minkowski spacetime; for instance, let `is definite as of' coincide with the causet order relation. However, to those seeking a genuinely `tensed' metaphysics of time, Stein's result has always had limited appeal. At best it defines a notion of becoming compatible with Minkowski spacetime. But if one desires that Minkowski spacetime {\em itself} grows or changes, as many metaphysicians of time do, then Stein's project is simply seen as irrelevant. As Callender (2000) and Skow (2009, 668n) point out, there is a difference between notions of becoming and flow that are observer- or event-dependent and those that are independent of observers or events. If one wants the world to become, as tensers do, then one wants a more substantial perspective-independent sense of becoming. Can CST provide us with this?
\section{Taking growth seriously}
There is nothing in the kinematics of CST that suggests any kind of ontological growth. To find anything smacking of growth, one needs to turn to the dynamics, which is imposed to restrict the vast set of kinematically possible causets to the physically reasonable models of the theory. The usual dynamics for a causal set is a law of sequential growth. What grows are the number of elements, and it is assumed that the `birthing' of new elements is stochastic. Suppose $\Omega(n)$ is the set of $n$-element causets. Then the dynamics specifies transition probabilities for moving from one $\mathcal{C} \in \Omega(n)$ to another $\mathcal{C}' \in \Omega(n+1)$.
Innumerable growth laws are possible. Yet a remarkable theorem by Rideout and Sorkin (2000) shows that if the classical dynamics obeys some natural conditions such as label-independence and relativistic causality, then the dynamics is sharply constrained. In particular, it must come from a class of dynamics of sequential growth known as `generalized percolation'. Since the differences within this class will not matter for what follows, we can illustrate the idea with the simplest classical sequential growth dynamics that satisfies the Rideout-Sorkin theorem, namely, {\em transitive percolation}, a dynamics familiar in random graph theory.
A simple way to understand this dynamics is to imagine an order of element births, labeling that order using integers $0, 1, 2...$ such that they are consistent with the causal order, i.e., if $x \preceq y$, then $\mbox{label}(x) < \mbox{label}(y)$. (The reverse implication does not hold because the dynamics at some label time may birth a spacelike event, not one for which $x \preceq y$.) We begin with the causet's `big bang', the singleton set. Now when element 2 is birthed, there are two possibilities: either it is causally related to 1 or not, i.e., $1 \preceq 2$ or $\neg(1 \preceq 2)$. Transitive percolation assigns a probability $p$ to the two elements being causally linked and $1-p$ to the two elements not being causally linked. Ditto now for element 3, which has probability $p$ of being causally linked to 1 (2) and $1-p$ of not being causally linked to 1 (2). The dynamics enforces transitive closure, so if $1 \preceq 2$ and $2 \preceq 3$, then $1 \preceq 3$. Another way to conceive of the dynamics is that when each new causet $\mathcal{C}'$ is born, it chooses a previously existing causet $\mathcal{C}$ to be its ancestor with a certain probability.
The heart of the idea that CST rescues becoming involves taking sequential growth seriously:
\begin{quote}
The phenomenological passage of time is taken to be a manifestation of this continuing growth of the causet. Thus, we do not think of the process as happening `in time' but rather as `constituting time'... (Rideout and Sorkin 2000, 024002-2)
\end{quote}
Becoming is embodied in the `birthing' of new elements.
Although we are interested in becoming, we should immediately remark that sequential growth is certainly compatible with a tenseless or block picture of time. In mathematics a stochastic process is defined as a triad of a sample space, a sigma algebra on that space, and a probability measure whose domain is the sigma algebra. Transition probabilities are viewed merely as the materials from which this triad is built. In the case at hand, the sample space is the set $\Omega = \Omega(\infty)$ of past-finite and future-infinite labeled causets that have been `run to infinity'. The `dynamics' is given by the probability measure constructed from the transition probabilities; for details, see Brightwell et al (2003). On this picture, the theory consists simply of a space of tenseless histories with a probability measure over them.\footnote{This interpretation corresponds to Huggett's first option (2014, 16), which is fully B-theoretic. When we consider `taking growth seriously', we mean to essentially follow the second route he offers: augmenting the causal structure with an additional, but gauge-invariant, dynamics.}
However, let's take the growth seriously. There are different extents to which this can be done. At a more modest level, and consistent with explicit pronouncements by advocates of causet becoming, we can articulate a localized, observer-dependent form of becoming. Here, the idea is that becoming occurs not in an objective, global manner, but instead with respect to an observer situated within the world that becomes. The only facts of the matter concerning becoming are local, and are experienced by individual observers as they inch toward the future. In Sorkin's words, which are worth quoting in full,
\begin{quote}
[o]ur `now' is (approximately) local and if we ask whether a distant event spacelike to us has or has not happened yet, this question lacks intuitive sense. But the `opponents of becoming' seem not to content themselves with the experience of a `situated observer'. They want to imagine themselves as a `super observer', who would take in all of existence at a glance. The supposition of such an observer {\em would} lead to a distinguished `slicing' of the causet, contradicting the principle that such a slicing lacks objective meaning (`covariance'). (2007, 158)
\end{quote}
According to Sorkin, instead of ``super observers'', we have an ``asynchronous multiplicity of `nows' ''. It seems fairly straightforward that a perfectly analogous kind of becoming can be had in the context of Minkowski spacetime. Indeed, `past lightcone becoming', based on Stein's theorem, and `worldline becoming', as articulated by Clifton and Hogarth (1995), both satisfy the bill.\footnote{Cf.\ also Arageorgis (2012) who makes a similar point.}
Although Sorkin himself remains uncommitted concerning whether the analogy holds, Fay Dowker (2014) rejects it, arguing that `asynchronous becoming' is not compatible with general relativity, but only with CST with a dynamics like the one provided by the classical sequential growth (and hence also not with the purely kinematic CST). The reason for this seems to be ultimately metaphysical, because only with the dynamics do we get not just the events, but their `occurrence'. Since in general relativity spacetime events do not `occur', goes the thought, there is no genuine form of becoming possible. Against this, we note firstly that (a large subsector of) general relativity certainly can be described in a `dynamical' manner via its many `3+1' formulations.\footnote{Cf.\ Wald (1984, Ch.~10).} To make her objection, Dowker would first need to elaborate the reasons why a 3+1 dynamics does not provide the `occurrence' she desires. Furthermore, we note here a possible tension. If occurrence is simply a label for some events from the perspective of other events, then there is no problem---but then we note that such labels can be given consistently in general relativity too. But if occurrence implies something metaphysically meaty, such as existence or determinateness---then there is a possible tension between occurrence and the local becoming envisioned by Sorkin and Dowker. If spacetime events that are spacelike related do not exist for each other, for instance, then that is a radical fragmentation of reality.\footnote{In Pooley's view (2013, 358n), dynamical CST should best be interpreted as a ``non-standard $A$ Theory'' in Fine's (2005) sense, i.e., as giving up ``the idea that there are absolute facts of the matter about the way the world is.'' (2013, 334)} Not only would that be a high cost to introduce becoming, but it is also one that, again, could be introduced in the ordinary theory.
Our present interest is to determine whether a more ambitious, objective, global, observer-independent form of becoming is compatible with CST-cum-dynamics in a way that does not violate the strictures of relativity. In other words, does Sorkin's assertion in the last sentence of the indented quote above holds up to scrutiny? We will argue that it does not and that there is a weak sense in which a fully objective kind of becoming with relativistic credentials can be had.
Even before worrying about relativity, one might be concerned that an analogue of Jack Smart's `how fast does time fly?' objection applies when we turn to the dynamics (Smart 1966). Smart famously argued that if time changes and change is the having of different properties at different times, then it seems that at least two times are needed for any metaphysics wherein the present moves. That seems to be the case here too. Remember that the elements being created are spatiotemporal. What does a dynamics over variables that are spatiotemporal even mean? We have an external time given by the dynamics---the time in which growth happens---and an internal time given by the spatiotemporal metric the causet inherits from its embedding into a relativistic spacetime. The causal set counterpart of Smart's question beckons: how fast are elements born?
Is Smart's objection fatal to the idea of cosmological `growth'? Here philosophical opinion divides. Anticipating Smart's question, C.D.~Broad (1938) argued that the kind of change that time undergoes is a {\em sui generis} kind of process. It is not to be analyzed as qualitative change, i.e.\ the change of properties with respect to time. It is its own thing. We get a hint of that answer in Rideout and Sorkin's claim that birthing {\em constitutes} time and is not {\em in} time. The causet growth is time, in some sense, not something that happens in time. Like Broad, Bradford Skow (2009) believes that a second-order time is not required to make sense of a substantive notion of temporal passage. He regards this apparent second time dimension as a kind of metaphor to understand the action of primitive tense operators. For philosophers such as Broad and Skow, Smart's objection has no purchase. Others, however, might complain that appeal to {\em sui generis} processes and primitive logico-linguistic devices leaves a lot to be desired in terms of physical clarity.\footnote{Or simply not evade the problem, as pressed by Pooley (2013, Section 4).} No matter our personal reactions to this issue, we will bracket this worry since stopping at this point would be needlessly controversial. After all, we are trying to give CST becoming its best chance.
The problem with taking the primitive growth as vindicating becoming is that advocates of CST uniformly wish to treat the labeling time as `fictitious'. The reason is that the choice of label is tantamount to picking a time coordinate $x_0$ in a relativistic spacetime. Any dynamics distinguishing a particular label order will be non-relativistic. Not wanting the dynamics to distinguish a particular label (`coordinatization'), the authors impose {\em discrete general covariance} on the dynamics. This is a form of label invariance. The idea is that the probability of any particular causet arising should be independent of the path to get to that causet. In particular, if $\alpha$ is one path from the singleton causet to an $n$-element causet, and $\beta$ is another path to the same causet, then the product of the transition probabilities along the links of $\alpha$ is the same as that for $\beta$ (and any other such path).
To get a feel for this, suppose that the singleton set births a timelike related element, Alice's birthday, at label time $l=1$, and then this 2-element causet births a third element, Bob's birthday, spacelike related to the other two events at label time $l=2$. That is path $\alpha$. Path $\beta$ instead births Bob's birthday spacelike related to the singleton set, and then births Alice's birthday timelike related only to the singleton set. Discrete general covariance implies that the product of the transition probabilities getting from the singleton to that 3-element causet is the same. Used as a condition to derive the dynamics, all sequential growth dynamics compatible with CST possess this symmetry. The further interpretation is that the probabilities respect this symmetry because the labels are pure gauge, that there is no fact of the matter about which path was taken.
\begin{figure}
\centering
\epsfig{figure=alicebob,width=0.6\linewidth}
\caption{\label{fig:alicebob} Alice's and Bob's birthday parties come into being.}
\end{figure}
With this simple example in mind, one can immediately see the trouble with regarding this growth as a real physical process (see Figure \ref{fig:alicebob}). Suppose the event $a$ timelike related to the singleton set is Alice's birthday party and suppose the event $b$ spacelike related to both is Bob's birthday party. To enforce consistency with relativity, there is no fact of the matter about which one happened right after the singleton element event. To say which one happened `first' is to invoke non-relativistic concepts. It is therefore hard to understand how there can be growth happening in time. Seeing the difficulty here, Earman (2008) suggests a kind of philosophical addition to causal sets, one where we imagine that `actuality' does take one path or another. With such a hidden variable moving up the causet, we do regain a notion of becoming. But as Aristidis Arageorgis (2012) rightly points out, such a move really flies in the face of the normal interpretation of these labels as pure gauge.\footnote{Cf.\ also Butterfield (2007, 859f).} The natural suggestion, espoused by (almost all?) philosophers of physics, is then that the above tenseless interpretation is best because it does not ask us to imagine that one event came first.
Perhaps the sensible reaction to this problem is to abandon the hope that CST does produce a novel sense of becoming. Still, we are tempted to press on. The intuition motivating us is as follows. True, the dynamics is written in terms of a choice of label, but we know that a consistent gauge invariant dynamics exists `beneath' this dynamics. In fact, rewriting the theory in terms of a probability measure space, as indicated above, one can quotient out under relabellings to arrive at a label-invariant measure space (for construction and details, see Brightwell et al 2003). And one thing that we know is gauge invariant is the number of elements in any causet. Focusing just on these and ignoring any labeling, we do have transitions from $\mathcal{C}$ to $\mathcal{C}'$ and so on. There is gauge-invariant growth.
The problem is that we are generally prohibited from saying exactly what elements exist at any stage of growth. Take the case of Alice and Bob above. The world grows from $\mathcal{C}_1$ to $\mathcal{C}_2$ to $\mathcal{C}_3$. That's gauge invariant. We just cannot say---not due to ignorance, but because there is no fact of the matter---whether $\mathcal{C}_2$ consists of the singleton plus Alice's party or the singleton plus Bob's party. Causal set reality does not contain this information. There simply is no determinate fact as to whether $\mathcal{C}_2$ contains $a$ or $b$; but there is a determinate fact that it contains one of them. If it is coherent, therefore, to speak of a causet having a certain number of elements but without saying what those elements are, then CST does permit a new kind of---admittedly radical and bizarre---temporal becoming.
Whether this notion of becoming is coherent depends on the identity conditions one has for events. If to be an event, one has to be a particular type of event with a certain character, then perhaps the idea is not coherent. After all, what is the $\mathcal{C}_2$ world like? It does not have Alice {\em and} Bob in it (that's $\mathcal{C}_3$), nor does it have {\em neither} Alice nor Bob in it (that's $\mathcal{C}_1$). The world determinately has Alice or Bob in it, but it does not have determinately Alice or determinately Bob. `Determinately' cannot penetrate inside the disjunction. Notice that this feature is a hallmark of vagueness or of metaphysical indeterminacy more generally. Without going into any details of the vast literature on vagueness, let us note that there is a lively dispute over whether there can be ontological vagueness. The causal set program, interpreted as we have here, supplies a possible model of a world that is ontologically vague. Further discussion of this model seems to us worthwhile.
First, we would simply like to point out that Ted Sider (2003) has supplied arguments that existence cannot be vague. That existence cannot be vague or indeterminate was a central assumption of his argument to four-dimensionalism in his [2001]. In fact, he asserts (2003, 135) that anyone who accepts the premise that existence cannot be vague is committed to four-dimensionalism, the thesis that objects persist by having temporal parts. To the extent to which many advocates of becoming reject four-dimensionalism anyway, they would thus be open to embrace ontological indeterminacy even if Sider's arguments of 2001 and 2003 were successful. And they may well not be: one of them, for instance, infers to the impossibility of vague existence from the claim that it cannot be vague how many things there are in a finite world (2001, 136f). Obviously, a defender of observer-independent becoming in CST may agree that it is at no moment vague how many events there exist, but nevertheless disagree that existence cannot be vague. Thus, we may have ontological indeterminacy without vagueness in the cardinality of the (finite) set of all existing objects.
One may be worried that on this notion of becoming in CST, no event in a future-infinite causet may ever be determinate until future infinity is reached, at which point everything snaps into determinate existence. This worry is particularly pressing as realistic causets are often taken to be future-infinite. So does any event ever get determinate at any finite stage of becoming? In general, yes. One way to see this is by way of example. As it turns out, causets based on transitive percolation in general have many `posts', where a {\em post} is an event that is comparable to every other event, i.e., an event that either is causally preceded or causally precedes every other event in the causet. Rideout and Sorkin interpret the resulting cosmological model as one in which ``the universe cycles endlessly through phases of expansion, stasis, and contraction [...] back down to a single element.'' (1999, 024002-4)\footnote{Cf.\ also Bollob\'as and Brightwell (1997).} Consider the situation as depicted in Figure \ref{fig:postgrowth}.
\begin{figure}
\centering
\epsfig{figure=postgrowth,width=0.78\linewidth}
\caption{\label{fig:postgrowth} Becoming at post $p$.}
\end{figure}
There is a post, $p$, such that $N$ events causally precede $p$, while all the others---potentially infinitely many---are causally preceded by $p$. At stage $N-1$, shown on the left, there exist $N-1$ events. At this stage, all the `ancestors' of $p$ except those three events which immediately precede $p$, shown in black, must have determinately come to be. Of the three immediate predecessors, shown in grey to indicate their indeterminate status, two must exist; however, it is indeterminate which two of the three exist. At the prior stage $N-2$, the grey set of events existing indeterminately would have extended one `generation' further back, as it could be that two comparable events are the last ones to come to be before the post becomes. At the next stage, stage $N$, $N$ events exist and it is determinate that all ancestors of $p$ exist. There is no ontological indeterminacy at this stage. Event $p$ has not yet come to be at either stage and is thus shown in white. At stage $N+1$, not shown in Figure \ref{fig:postgrowth}, event $p$ determinately comes into existence. At stage $N+2$, one of the two immediate successor to $p$ exists, but it is indeterminate which one. And so on.
One may object that this interpretation of the dynamics of a future-infinite causet presupposes a given final state toward which the causet evolves. Even though everything in the preceding paragraph is true under the supposition that the final causet is the one represented in Figure \ref{fig:postgrowth}, the objection goes, at stage $N$ it is not yet determined {\em that} $p$ is a post, as there could have been other events spacelike-related to $p$. Given that it is thus indeterminate whether $p$ is indeed a post, and since this is the case for all events at finite stages, no events can thus snap into determinate existence at any finite stage of the dynamical growth process.
First, it should be noted that even if this objection succeeds, it is still the case that it is objectively and determinately the case that at each stage, one event comes into being and that thus the cardinality of the sum total of existence grows. Although the ontological indeterminacy remains maximal, there is a weak sense in which there is objective, observer-independent becoming. Second, if the causet does indeed not `tend' to some particular future-infinite causet, then all existence would always be altogether indeterminate (except for the cardinality). There would be no fact of the matter, ever, i.e., at any finite stage, of how the future will be, or indeed of how anything ever is. If this is the right way to think about the metaphysics of the dynamics of CST, we are left with a wildly indeterminate picture. Third, it should be noted that the mathematics of the dynamics is only well-defined in the infinite limit; in particular, for there to be a well-defined probability measure on $\Omega$, we must take $\Omega = \Omega(\infty)$ (Sorkin 2007, 160n; Arageorgis 2012, Section 3), which can be interpreted to mean that the future-infinite `end state' is metaphysically prior to the stochastic dynamics that grows the causet to that `state'.
Note the strange features of this metaphysics. First, note that many philosophers, from Aristotle to today, have thought that the future is indeterminate (see, e.g., \O hrstr\o m and Hasle 2011 and references therein). According to some versions of this view, it is determinately true that tomorrow's coin flip will result in either a head or a tail, but it is not determinate yet which result obtains. Vagueness infects the future. We note that the above causal set vagueness is quite similar, but with one big difference: on the causal set picture, the past too can be indeterminate! In our toy causal set, it is not true at $\mathcal{C}_3$ that $\mathcal{C}_2$ determinately is one way rather than the other.
Second, as a causet grows, events that were once spacelike to the causet might acquire timelike links to future events. If we regard the growth of a new timelike link to a spacelike event as making the spacelike event determinate, modulo the above type of vagueness, then this is a way future becoming can make events past. That is, there is a literal sense in which one can say that ``the past isn't what it used to be''. Strange as this may sound, it should be noted that the `growth' of the past stands in perfect analogy to that in past-lightcone becoming.
Finally, although we don't have space to discuss it here, observe that despite appearances transitive percolation is perfectly time reversal invariant. This allows the construction of an even more exotic temporal metaphysics. If we relax the assumption that events can only be born to the future of existing events, then it is possible to have percolation---and hence becoming---going both to the future and past. Choose a here-now as the original point. Then it is possible to modify the theory so that the world becomes in both directions, future and past. Of course, similarly, we could have a causal set that is future-finite and only grows into the past, and thus is past-infinite.
\section{Conclusion}
We have investigated the claim that CST rescues temporal becoming. At the kinematical level, CST does offer new twists in dealing with time and relativity, but the basic contours of the relativistic challenge remains. Serious constraints also threaten becoming if we take the time in CST's dynamics seriously too. Here, however, if one is open to the costs of a sufficiently radical metaphysics, we maintain that there is a novel and exotic type of temporal becoming possible.
\section*{Acknowledgements}
We are indebted to Caro Brighouse, Juliusz Doboszewski, Sam Fletcher, Nick Huggett, David Meyer, Oliver Pooley, David Rideout, and Sebastian Speitel, as well as audiences at the Pacific APA in San Diego, the BSPS in Cambridge, and the Minnesota Center for Philosophy of Science for discussions and comments.
\vspace{1cm}
\begin{flushright}
Christian W\"uthrich\\
(as of 1 August 2015:) D\'epartement de philosophie, Universit\'e de Gen\`eve, Geneva, Switzerland\\
christian.wuthrich@unige.ch\\
\vspace{5mm}
Craig Callender\\
Department of Philosophy, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA\\
<EMAIL>
\end{flushright}
|
\section{Introduction}
The theoretical explanation for the observed neutrino oscillations and neutrino
masses requires physics beyond the Standard Model.
Furthermore the presence of Dark Matter and the observed baryon
asymmetry of the Universe (BAU) support the need for a more
fundamental theory.
In the present article we will establish a connection between two of the above
mentioned observations and investigate the Baryogenesis through leptogenesis
scenario \cite{Fukugita:1986hr} in an $\text{SU}(5)\times\text{A}_5$ flavour model.
The model we are going to discuss here is the first GUT A$_5$
golden ratio flavour model with successful leptogenesis to our knowledge.
This recently proposed
model \cite{Gehrlein:2014wda} has the feature that $\theta_{12}$ is connected to
the golden ratio $\phi_g=\frac{1+\sqrt{5}}{2}$ via $\theta_{12}=\tan^{-1}\left(\frac{1}{\phi_g}\right)$.
Similar to the golden ratio (GR) type A models in \cite{GoldenRatioA} the reactor angle
is predicted to be vanishing at leading order and the atmospheric angle to be maximal.
Hence, the neutrino mixing matrix $U_{\text{GR}}$ has the form
\begin{equation}
U_{\text{GR}}=
\begin{pmatrix}
\sqrt{\frac{\phi_{g}}{\sqrt{5}}} & \sqrt{\frac{1}{\phi_{g}\sqrt{5}}} & 0\\
-\sqrt{\frac{1}{2\phi_{g}\sqrt{5}}} & \sqrt{\frac{\phi_{g}}{2\sqrt{5}}} & \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\\
\sqrt{\frac{1}{2\phi_{g}\sqrt{5}}} & -\sqrt{\frac{\phi_{g}}{2\sqrt{5}}} & \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}
\end{pmatrix}
P_{0} \;,
\label{eq:U_GR}
\end{equation}
which is given in the convention of the Particle Data Group \cite{Beringer:1900zz}
with the diagonal matrix $P_{0}$ = Diag$( \text{exp} (- \tfrac{\text{i} \alpha_{1}}{2}), \text{exp}(- \tfrac{\text{i}\alpha_{2}}{2} ),1 )$
containing the Majorana phases. Since the experimental values for the angles,
cf.~Tab.~\ref{tab:exp_parameters}, strongly disfavour $\theta_{13}$ to be vanishing
the leading order mixing angles have to be corrected to realistic values.
In \cite{Gehrlein:2014wda} we followed the approach based on Grand Unification where
the neutrino mixing angles receive corrections from the charged lepton sector.
Namely this model features SU(5) unification. Thereby we could explore the SU(5)
relation $\theta_{13}\approx \theta_C/\sqrt{2}$ from the non-standard Yukawa-coupling
relations $y_\tau/y_b = -1.5$ and $y_\mu/y_s = 6$ \cite{Antusch:2009gu,Antusch:2011qg},
and for the double ratio $(y_\mu/y_s)(y_d/y_e) = 12$ which are all in perfect agreement with experimental data.
In addition to the corrections from the charged lepton sector renormalisation group
running effects (RGE) have to be taken into account. Due to a neutrino mass sum rule
in both hierarchies only a certain mass range is allowed. For the inverted ordering
this implies large RGE effects for $\theta_{12}$ which rule out this ordering.
Since the light neutrino masses are generated via the type-I-seesaw mechanism
in \cite{Gehrlein:2014wda} the Baryogenesis through leptogenesis mechanism can
be easily implemented. In this mechanism the dynamically generated lepton asymmetry
is converted into a baryon asymmetry due to sphaleron interactions. Thermal
leptogenesis can take place when the heavy RH Majorana neutrinos (and their
SUSY partners the sneutrinos) decay out-of-equilibrium in a CP and lepton-number
violating way.
Flavour effects \cite{Nardi:2006fx, Abada:2006fw,Abada:2006ea}
(see also, e.g.,
\cite{Pascoli:2006ie,Branco:2006ce,Davidson:2008bu,Branco:2011zb})
can play an important role in thermal leptogenesis.
We set the scale at which leptogenesis takes place to be the see-saw
scale $M_S=10^{13}$ GeV. In the model considered we have
also $\tan \beta=30$ \cite{Gehrlein:2014wda}, and
thus, the scale $M_S$ falls in the interval
$10^9 (1+\tan^2\beta)$ GeV$<M_S<10^{12} (1+\tan^2\beta)$~GeV.
For values of $M_S$ in this interval \cite{Pascoli:2006ci}
the baryon asymmetry is produced in the two-flavour leptogenesis regime
and we perform the analysis of baryon
asymmetry generation in this regime.
We will see that the original model cannot accommodate for the observed value of the
baryon asymmetry due to the structure of the neutrino Yukawa matrix.
In fact, there would be no baryon asymmetry generated via the
leptogenesis mechanism.
In order to generate
a non-zero asymmetry we will introduce only one additional operator in the neutrino sector which
corrects the neutrino Yukawa matrix and subsequently affects the phenomenology of the model.
The paper is organized as follows: Section 2 is a short overview of the model building aspects
including the NLO operator. In section 3 we discuss the analytical results for the phenomenology
of the model. There we also describe the relevant formulas for leptogenesis. In section 4 we show
the results of a numerical parameter scan. We discuss the predictions for the mixing parameters
including the phases as well as for the sum of the neutrino masses, the observable in neutrinoless
double beta-decay, the kinematic mass $m_{\beta}$ and for the generated baryon asymmetry. In section
5 we summarise and conclude.
\begin{table}
\centering
\begin{tabular}{lcc}
\toprule
Parameter & best-fit ($\pm 1\sigma$) & $ 3\sigma$ range\\
\midrule
$\theta_{12}$ in $^{\circ}$ & $ 33.48^{+0.78}_{-0.75}$& $31.29\rightarrow 35.91$\\[0.5 pc]
$\theta_{13}$ in $^{\circ}$ & $ 8.50^{+0.20}_{-0.21}$& $7.85\rightarrow 9.10$\\[0.5 pc]
$\theta_{23}$ in $^{\circ}$ & $ 42.3^{+3.0}_{-1.6}$ & $38.2\rightarrow 53.3$\\[0.5 pc]
$\delta$ in $^{\circ}$&$306^{+39}_{-70}$&$0\rightarrow 360$\\
\midrule
$\Delta m_{21}^{2}$ in $10^{-5}$~eV$^2$ & $7.50^{+0.19}_{-0.17}$ & $7.02\rightarrow 8.09$\\[0,5 pc]
$\Delta m_{31}^{2}$ in $10^{-3}$~eV$^2$ &$2.457^{+0.047}_{-0.047}$&$2.317\rightarrow 2.607$\\
\bottomrule
\end{tabular}
\caption{The best-fit values and the 3$\sigma$ ranges for the parameters in the normal ordering taken from \cite{Gonzalez-Garcia:2014bfa}.
}
\label{tab:exp_parameters}
\end{table}
\section{Model building aspects}
\label{sec:Modelbuilding}
The model we are going to discuss is based on the SU(5)$\times$A$_5$ model
proposed in \cite{Gehrlein:2014wda}.
We only had to extend it minimally to accommodate successful
leptogenesis. The modification we are going to introduce
has further implications for the phenomenology.
We focus first on the related model building aspects.
We briefly revise the leading order (LO) superpotential for the neutrino
sector, which is identical to the original model before we introduce the
corrections. They are induced by an additional operator in the superpotential
which yields next-to-leading order (NLO) corrections to the Yukawa couplings
while the right-handed neutrino Majorana mass matrix remains unaffected. This
single higher order operator will generate a sufficiently
large baryon asymmetry to be in agreement with the experimental
observations.
\subsection{The neutrino sector at LO}
We briefly summarise next the relevant parts of
the original SU(5)$\times$A$_5$ model from \cite{Gehrlein:2014wda}.
We are not going to discuss the flavon vacuum alignment which
does not change at all and is given in the original paper.
The matter content of our model is organised in ten-dimensional representations
of SU(5), $T_i$ with $i = 1$, 2, 3, five-dimensional representations $F$,
and one-dimensional representations $N$ which transform as one-, three- and
three-dimensional representations of A$_5$ respectively, see also Tab.~\ref{tab:Fields}.
Additionally, we had introduced in the original model the following flavons which will appear in the neutrino
sector. There are two flavons which transform as one-dimensional representations under A$_5$
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:vev1}
\langle \theta_2 \rangle = v_{\theta_2} \;, \quad \langle \epsilon_1 \rangle = v_{\epsilon_1} \;,
\end{equation}
one flavon in a three-dimensional representation
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:vev3}
\langle \phi_3 \rangle = v_\phi^{(3)} \left(0,0,1\right) \;,
\end{equation}
and one flavon in a five-dimensional representation
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:vev5}
\langle \omega \rangle = \left(\sqrt{\tfrac{2}{3}} (v_2 + v_3), v_3, v_2, v_2, v_3\right) \;.
\end{equation}
Their charges under the shaping symmetries are given in Tab.~\ref{tab:Fields}.
Note especially that no new flavon appeared.
\begin{table}
\centering
\begin{tabular}{l c l c c c c c c c c c c}
\toprule
& $\mathrm{SU(5)}$ & $\mathrm{A_5}$ & $\mathbb{Z}_{4}^R$ & $\mathbb{Z}_2$ & $\mathbb{Z}_2$ &
$\mathbb{Z}_3$ & $\mathbb{Z}_3$ & $\mathbb{Z}_3$ & $\mathbb{Z}_3$ & $\mathbb{Z}_3$ & $\mathbb{Z}_3$ & $\mathbb{Z}_4$ \\
\midrule
$F $ & $\mathbf{\bar{5}} $ & $\mathbf{3}$ & $1$ & $0$ & $0$ & $0$ & $0$ & $1$ & $2$ & $0$ & $0$ & $0$ \\
$N $ & $\mathbf{1} $ & $\mathbf{3}$ & $1$ & $0$ & $0$ & $0$ & $0$ & $0$ & $2$ & $0$ & $0$ & $2$ \\
$T_1 $ & $\mathbf{10} $ & $\mathbf{1}$ & $1$ & $1$ & $0$ & $2$ & $2$ & $2$ & $2$ & $0$ & $0$ & $0$ \\
$T_2 $ & $\mathbf{10} $ & $\mathbf{1}$ & $1$ & $0$ & $0$ & $0$ & $2$ & $1$ & $1$ & $0$ & $0$ & $3$ \\
$T_3 $ & $\mathbf{10} $ & $\mathbf{1}$ & $1$ & $0$ & $0$ & $0$ & $0$ & $2$ & $2$ & $0$ & $0$ & $3$ \\
$H_5 $ & $\mathbf{5} $ & $\mathbf{1}$ & $0$ & $0$ & $0$ & $0$ & $0$ & $2$ & $2$ & $0$ & $0$ & $2$ \\
$\bar{H}_5 $ & $\mathbf{\bar{5}} $ & $\mathbf{1}$ & $0$ & $0$ & $0$ & $2$ & $1$ & $2$ & $0$ & $0$ & $1$ & $0$ \\
\midrule
$\phi_3 $ & $\mathbf{1}$ & $\mathbf{3 }$ & $0$ & $1$ & $1$ & $0$ & $2$ & $0$ & $2$ & $2$ & $0$ & $1$ \\
$\omega $ & $\mathbf{1}$ & $\mathbf{5 }$ & $0$ & $0$ & $0$ & $0$ & $0$ & $0$ & $2$ & $0$ & $0$ & $0$ \\
$\theta_2 $ & $\mathbf{1}$ & $\mathbf{1 }$ & $0$ & $1$ & $1$ & $0$ & $2$ & $1$ & $2$ & $1$ & $0$ & $3$ \\
$\epsilon_1 $ & $\mathbf{1}$ & $\mathbf{1 }$ & $0$ & $0$ & $0$ & $0$ & $1$ & $1$ & $1$ & $0$ & $0$ & $0$ \\
\midrule
$\Gamma_1 $ & $\mathbf{1} $ & $\mathbf{3}$ & $0$ & $0$ & $0$ & $0$ & $1$ & $1$ & $1$ & $0$ & $0$ & $0$ \\
$\bar{\Gamma}_1 $ & $\mathbf{1} $ & $\mathbf{3}$ & $2$ & $0$ & $0$ & $0$ & $2$ & $2$ & $2$ & $0$ & $0$ & $0$ \\
$\Gamma_3 $ & $\mathbf{1} $ & $\mathbf{1}$ & $0$ & $0$ & $0$ & $0$ & $2$ & $2$ & $2$ & $0$ & $0$ & $0$ \\
$\bar{\Gamma}_3 $ & $\mathbf{1} $ & $\mathbf{1}$ & $2$ & $0$ & $0$ & $0$ & $1$ & $1$ & $1$ & $0$ & $0$ & $0$ \\
$\Psi_1 $ & $\mathbf{5} $ & $\mathbf{3}$ & $1$ & $0$ & $0$ & $0$ & $1$ & $0$ & $2$ & $0$ & $0$ & $0$ \\
$\bar{\Psi}_1 $ & $\mathbf{\bar{5}}$ & $\mathbf{3}$ & $1$ & $0$ & $0$ & $0$ & $2$ & $0$ & $1$ & $0$ & $0$ & $0$ \\
$\Psi_2 $ & $\mathbf{5} $ & $\mathbf{3}$ & $0$ & $0$ & $0$ & $0$ & $1$ & $0$ & $0$ & $0$ & $0$ & $2$ \\
$\bar{\Psi}_2 $ & $\mathbf{\bar{5}}$ & $\mathbf{3}$ & $2$ & $0$ & $0$ & $0$ & $2$ & $0$ & $0$ & $0$ & $0$ & $2$ \\
\bottomrule
\end{tabular}
\caption{Charges under $\mathbb{Z}_n$ and $\mathrm{SU(5)}$ and
$\mathrm{A_5}$ representations of all the fields appearing in
the neutrino sector of the model. Note that the only new fields
compared to \cite{Gehrlein:2014wda} are the messenger fields
$\Psi_1$, $\bar{\Psi}_1$, $\Psi_2$ and $\bar{\Psi}_2$.
}
\label{tab:Fields}
\end{table}
We are not going to discuss here the quark sector,
it was analysed in \cite{Gehrlein:2014wda}.
In what concerns the charged lepton sector, we only note that
for the matrix of charged lepton Yukawa couplings we find
\begin{align}
Y_e &= \begin{pmatrix}
0 & - 1/2 a_{21} & 0\\
6 a_{12} & 6 a_{22} & 6 a_{32}\\
0 & 0 & - 3/2 a_{33}\\
\end{pmatrix}~\; .
\label{eq:yuk_charged}
\end{align}
The order one coefficients in front of the parameters
$a_{ij}$ are SU(5) Clebsch-Gordan coefficients which imply
that
\begin{equation}
\theta_{13} \approx \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \theta_{C} \;,
\label{eq:theta_C1}
\end{equation}
where $\theta_C$ is the Cabibbo angle. This is only
possible due to the non-standard Clebsch-Gordan coeffcients
\cite{Antusch:2009gu} as it was realised
in a series of papers \cite{Antusch:2011qg}.
The flavon $\omega$ is responsible for the GR structure of the Majorana
mass matrix which can be seen in the LO superpotential for the neutrino
sector which reads
\begin{align}
\mathcal{W}^{\text{LO}}_\nu &= y_1^n F N H_5 + y_2^n N N \omega \;.
\label{eq:superpot_neutrino}
\end{align}
The right-handed neutrino mass matrix then reads
\begin{align}
M_{\text{RR}} &= y_2^n \begin{pmatrix}
2 \sqrt{\frac{2}{3}}(v_2 + v_3) & -\sqrt{3} v_2 & -\sqrt{3} v_2 \\
-\sqrt{3}v_2 & \sqrt{6}v_3 &- \sqrt{\frac{2}{3}}(v_2 + v_3)\\
-\sqrt{3}v_2 & -\sqrt{\frac{2}{3}}(v_2 + v_3) & \sqrt{6} v_3\\
\end{pmatrix} \;
\label{eq:massmatrix_righthanded}
\end{align}
and the neutrino Yukawa couplings are
\begin{equation}
Y_\nu^{\text{LO}} = y_1^n \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 \\ 0 & 1 & 0 \end{pmatrix} \;,
\label{eq:yukawamatrix_neutrino}
\end{equation}
which are diagonalised by the golden ratio mixing matrix
$U_{\text{GR}}$ from eq.~\eqref{eq:U_GR}.
Note that we are using the right-left convention for the Yukawa matrices,
which means that the first index of the matrix corresponds to the
SU(2)$_L$ singlet.
This is the structure of the original model which
cannot accommodate for the observed value of the baryon asymmetry of
the universe, as we will see later on.
In order to generate a
non-zero asymmetry we follow the approach as described in \cite{Hagedorn:2009jy}
and introduce an additional operator which perturbs the original flavour structure
of the model. Note nevertheless, that compared to \cite{Hagedorn:2009jy}
we do not introduce an additional flavon and no additional shaping symmetries.
Here it is sufficient to extend minimally
the messenger content of the model.
\subsection{The neutrino sector at NLO}
In this section we discuss the NLO superpotential of the neutrino sector. In order to
accommodate leptogenesis
which can generate the observed value of the baryon asymmetry,
we will introduce a correction to the neutrino Yukawa matrix
governed by the operator $F N \phi_3 \theta_2 H_5\epsilon_1^2$. This operator was absent
in the original model but can be added by introducing only two new pairs of
messenger fields $\Psi_1$, $\bar{\Psi}_1$, $\Psi_2$ and $\bar{\Psi}_2$.
The renormalisable superpotential of the NLO neutrino sector reads
\begin{align}
\begin{split}
\mathcal{W}_\nu^{\text{ren, NLO}} &= M_{\Psi_1} \Psi_1 \bar{\Psi}_1 + M_{\Psi_2} \Psi_2 \bar{\Psi}_2 + F \Psi_1 \Gamma_3+N \bar{\Psi}_1 \Psi_2+\bar{\Psi}_2 H_5 \Gamma_1+ \epsilon_1 \epsilon_1 \bar{\Gamma}_3+\theta_2 \phi_3 \bar{\Gamma}_1 \;,
\end{split}
\label{eq:renWnu}
\end{align}
where we have omitted the coupling constants to increase clarity and only
write down the operators which are new.
We assume the messenger masses to be larger than the GUT scale and to
be related to the messenger scale $\Lambda$ by $\mathcal{O}(1)$ coefficients.
The charges of the new messenger fields under the $\mathbb{Z}_n$ symmetries as well as their SU(5)
and A$_5$ representations are shown in Tab.~\ref{tab:Fields}.
The corresponding supergraphs for the leading order operator and the
next-to-leading order operator for the neutrino Yukawa matrix can be found in
Fig.~\ref{fig:diagram_NLO}.
\begin{figure}
\centering
\includegraphics[scale = 0.7]{plots/NN}
\includegraphics[scale = 0.7]{plots/FNH_LO} \\[2em]
\includegraphics[scale = 0.7]{plots/FNH_NLO}
\caption{
The supergraphs for the neutrino sector including LO and NLO operators.
}
\label{fig:diagram_NLO}
\end{figure}
No new operators compared
to the original model are possible apart from the one we discuss now. The only new effective operator is
\begin{equation}
\mathcal{W}_\nu^{\text{NLO}} = \frac{1}{\Lambda^4} ( (N F)_{\bf 3} \phi_3)_{\bf 1} H_5 \theta_2 \epsilon_1^2 \; ,
\end{equation}
where we have denoted with brackets the A$_5$ contractions. This operator gives a correction
to the neutrino Yukawa matrix
\begin{equation}
\delta Y_\nu \equiv | y_1^n | c \text{ e}^{\text{i } \gamma} \begin{pmatrix}0&1&0\\-1&0&0\\0&0&0\\ \end{pmatrix} \;,\label{eqn:Noperator}
\end{equation}
where $0 < c \ll 1$. This correction disturbs the golden ratio mixing
pattern already in the neutrino sector by itself and subsequently the
phenomenology of the original model, especially the prediction for
leptogenesis is modified.
\section{Phenomenology: Analytical Results}
In this section we will discuss the phenomenological implications of
introducing $\delta Y_\nu$. Because $c$ is small, in many cases the results
are similar to those obtained in the original model. However, as we will see,
in some cases when the leading order result was relatively small,
a correction of order $c$ can have a sizeable impact.
\subsection{Masses and Mixing Angles}
The original model was very predictive due to the built-in sum rules. And indeed
one mass sum rule remains valid. Since $M_{\text{RR}}$ is not corrected
the sum rule for the right-handed neutrino masses
\begin{equation}
M_1 + M_2 = M_3 \;,
\end{equation}
is still correct. Note that, the masses are taken here to be complex.
The situation for the light
neutrino masses is somewhat different:
they get corrections of the order of $c^2 \ll 1$. However,
since these corrections are small,
the sum rule
\begin{equation}
\frac{\text{e}^{\text{i} \, \alpha_{1}}}{\left|m_{1}\right|}+\frac{\text{e}^{\text{i} \, \alpha_{2}}}{\left|m_{2}\right|} - \frac{1}{\left|m_{3}\right|} = \mathcal{O}(c^2) \approx 0
\label{eq:masses_sum}
\end{equation}
is still a good approximation. And hence our estimate for the
ranges of the neutrino masses from \cite{Gehrlein:2014wda}
\begin{align}
0.011 \text{ eV} &\lesssim m_1 \phantom{\lesssim 0.454 \text{ eV}} \text{ for NO,} \label{eq:NHMassRange} \\
0.028 \text{ eV} &\lesssim m_3 \lesssim 0.454 \text{ eV} \text{ for IO.} \label{eq:IHMassRange}
\end{align}
is still reasonable.
For all three PMNS mixing angles we find corrections of order $c$.
For $\theta_{13}$ and $\theta_{23}$ the expressions are somewhat
lengthy and not insightful, but as an example we find as correction
for $\theta_{12}$ to first order in $c$
\begin{align}
\delta \theta_{12}^\nu &= - \frac{c \cos \gamma}{\sqrt{2}} - \frac{\sqrt{2} c \Im(M_1^\star M_2) \sin \gamma }{|M_1^2| - |M_2^2|} \; .
\end{align}
The corrections have immediate consequences for the phenomenology.
The first thing one might wonder, is if
the inverted mass ordering is still excluded like in the original model.
We begin our discussion
with the sum rule \cite{Petcov:2014laa}\footnote{
In the original model we had used another sum rule from \cite{Antusch:2005kw}
which can be derived from this sum rule by expanding in $\theta_{13}$.
But since $\theta_{13}$ is not very small we want to use now the improved
sum rule.}
\begin{equation}
\sin^2\theta_{12} = \cos^2\theta^{\nu}_{12} +
\frac{\sin2\theta_{12}\sin\theta_{13}\cos\delta
- \tan\theta_{23}\cos2\theta^{\nu}_{12}}
{\tan\theta_{23} (1 - \cot^2\theta_{23}\,\sin^2\theta_{13})}\, ,
\label{s2th12cosdthnu}
\end{equation}
where $\cos^2\theta^{\nu}_{12} = \phi_{g}/\sqrt{5}$ and $\cos2\theta^{\nu}_{12} = 2\phi_{g}/\sqrt{5} - 1$.
For $c = 0$ we can evaluate this sum rule and find $\theta_{12} \gtrsim 23^\circ$
(compared to $\theta_{12} \gtrsim 24^\circ$ from the sum rule in \cite{Antusch:2005kw}).
Using the lower bound on the mass scale in the inverted ordering case, cf.\ eq.~\eqref{eq:IHMassRange},
we can estimate that
the RGE evolved value of $\theta_{12}$ at the seesaw scale has to be smaller than about
5.7$^\circ$. Attributing this difference completely to the correction $\delta \theta_{12}^\nu$
with $\gamma = 0$ or $\pi$
we find $c \gtrsim 0.43$.
This is a crude estimate because the other mixing angles are affected as well
modifying the above sum rule in a non-trivial way. Nevertheless, from here
we would still expect
$c$ to be of order $0.1$ to safe the inverted mass ordering. On the other hand such a large
value for $c$ is not plausible from a model building point of view because it is associated
to a highly suppressed operator making values of $c = 10^{-4}$ to $10^{-3}$ plausible.
We will come back to this point later when we discuss the numerical results.
For future convenience, we introduce the following definitions for the
parameters which we will use as well in our numerical scan
\begin{align}
M_1&=\frac{1}{\sqrt{6}}(X+Y)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{6}}|X||1+\rho \text{ e}^{\text{i}\phi}|\text{e}^{\text{i}\phi_1}, ~\phi_1=\text{arg}(X+Y)~,\\
M_2&=\frac{1}{\sqrt{6}}(X-Y)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{6}}|X||1-\rho \text{ e}^{\text{i}\phi}|\text{e}^{\text{i}\phi_2},~ \phi_2=\text{arg}(X-Y)~,\\
M_3&=\sqrt{\frac{2}{3}} X=\sqrt{\frac{2}{3}} |X|\text{ e}^{\text{i}\phi_3},~ \phi_3=\text{arg}(X)~,
\end{align}
where
\begin{align}
X&=(4 v_3+ v_2)y_2^n~,\\
Y&=3\sqrt{5}v_2 y_2^n~,\\
\rho&=\left|\frac{Y}{X}\right|~,\\
\phi&=\text{arg}(Y)-\text{arg}(X)~.
\end{align}
In this way, we express the absolute value of the three heavy neutrino masses in terms of three real parameters, i.e., $|X|$, $\rho$ and $\phi$. $|X|$ sets the scale of our interest. $\rho$ reflects the detailed structure of the heavy neutrino mass spectrum. $\phi$ is connected to $\rho$ via the ratio of two mass squared differences
\begin{eqnarray}
\frac{\Delta m_{21}^2}{\Delta m_{31}^2}=\frac{16 \rho \cos\phi}{(\rho^2-2\rho\cos\phi+1)(\rho^2+2\rho\cos\phi-3)}~.\label{alphaphi}
\end{eqnarray}
Notice that we neglect here for the moment RG effects on the masses
and corrections of order $c^2$ to the neutrino masses which will turn
out to be well justified in the numerical analysis.
One of the Majorana phases which we choose to be $\phi_1$ can be set to zero by
applying a redefinition of the heavy Majorana fields.
The remaining two phases $\phi_2$ and $\phi_3$ can as well be expressed in terms of
$\rho$ and $\phi$ using the complex mass sum rule $M_1+M_2=M_3$
\begin{align}
\cos\phi_2&=\frac{|M_3|^2-|M_1|^2-|M_2|^2}{2|M_1||M_2|}=\frac{1-\rho^2}{\sqrt{1-2\rho^2\cos 2\phi+\rho^4}}~,\label{alphaphi2}\\
\cos\phi_3&=\frac{|M_1|^2-|M_2|^2+|M_3|^2}{2|M_1||M_3|}=\frac{1+\rho \cos\phi}{\sqrt{1+2\rho\cos \phi+\rho^2}}~.\label{alphaphi3}
\end{align}
Notice that only normal ordering is viable in this model, and the Yukawa
couplings are degenerate in LO so that we have $|M_3|<|M_2|<|M_1|$.
Thus $\cos\phi$ is positive, $\cos\phi_2$ is negative, $\cos\phi_3$ is positive, which
gives us a first constraint on $\rho$ which we will comment on later. Notice also that
the sign of $\sin\phi_2$ and $\sin\phi_3$ is not fixed. We plot the dependence of the
phases on $\rho$ in Fig.~\ref{fig:PhiAlpha}.
The Majorana phases $\alpha_1$, $\alpha_2$
and $\phi_2$, $\phi_3$ are related via
\begin{align} \label{eq:MajoranaPhases}
\alpha_1 = -\phi_3 \text{ and } \alpha_2 = \phi_2 - \phi_3 \;.
\end{align}
up to order $c^2$.
\begin{figure}
\centering
\includegraphics[scale=0.5]{plots/phialpha} \\[1em]
\includegraphics[scale=0.69]{plots/phi23alpha}
\caption{
The dependence of $\phi$ and the phases of the heavy Majorana
neutrinos on $\rho$ according to eqs.~(\ref{alphaphi}, \ref{alphaphi2}, \ref{alphaphi3}).
The unit for $\phi, \phi_2, \phi_3$ is rad. We use the best fit values from the global
fit \cite{Gonzalez-Garcia:2014bfa} for the two squared mass differences as input here.
}
\label{fig:PhiAlpha}
\end{figure}
We comment a little on the phases in the mass matrices. The heavy neutrino mass matrix is diagonalised as
\begin{align}
U_{ \text{GR}}^{\text{T}} M_{\text{RR}} U_{ \text{GR}}= D_N=\rm \text{Diag}( M_1\text{ e}^{\text{i}\phi_1},M_2\text{ e}^{\text{i}\phi_2},M_3\text{ e}^{\text{i}\phi_3} )\;,~\quad M_{1,2,3}>0~.
\end{align}
We eliminate the common phase by setting $\phi_1=0$ and attribute the phase factors to a phase matrix $ P=\text{Diag}(1, \text{e}^{\text{i}\phi_2/2}, \text{e}^{\text{i}\phi_3/2} ) $. Thus we have
\begin{align}
P^{-1} U_{ \text{GR}}^{\text{T}} M_{\text{RR}} U_{\text{GR}} P^{-1}= \rm \text{Diag}(M_1,M_2,M_3) \;,
\end{align}
which means $U_{\text{GR}}P^{-1}$ diagonalises the heavy neutrino mass matrix to real and non-negative eigenvalues. Applying the seesaw mechanism, we have
\begin{align}
m_{\text{LL}}=-m_{\text{D}}^{\text{T}} M_{\text{RR}}^{-1} m_{\text{D}}=U_\nu^\star \text{Diag} (m_1,m_2,m_3) U_\nu^\dagger~.\label{lightnumass}
\end{align}
Notice that from $U_{ \text{GR}}^{\text{T}} m_{\text{D}} U_{\text{ GR}}= y_1^n v_u\rm \text{Diag} (1,1,-1) + \mathcal{O}(c)$ we get
\begin{align}
U_\nu= \text{i } U_{\text{GR}} P~ + \mathcal{O}(c).
\end{align}
If we choose $y_1^n$ to be real and positive, the only complexity comes from the heavy
neutrino mass matrix and the phase $\gamma$. By ascribing the phases to the $P$ matrix,
the $m_i$, $i=1,2,3$ in eq.~\eqref{lightnumass} are real and non-negative up to
corrections of $\mathcal{O}(c)$. From now on, we use the symbol $M_i$ and $m_i$ to label
the real and non-negative masses.
\subsection{Leptogenesis}
\label{sec:AnalyticalLeptogenesis}
In this section we discuss analytical estimates for the generated baryon asymmetry
including all relevant parameters and formulas.
To discuss leptogenesis in this model, we first set our scale of interest, the see-saw
scale, to be $M_S\simeq10^{13}$ GeV. Taking into consideration $\tan\beta=30$, we
have $10^9 (1+\tan^2\beta)$ GeV$<M_S<10^{12} (1+\tan^2\beta)$~GeV, which
as was shown in \cite{Pascoli:2006ci},
corresponds to the ``two-flavoured leptogenesis''
regime~\cite{Nardi:2006fx,Abada:2006fw,Abada:2006ea}, i.e., the
regime where the
processes mediated by the $\tau$ Yukawa
couplings enter into equilibrium.
Later on in our numerical scan we will find
that in order to generate realistic neutrino masses
the parameter $\rho$ has to satisfy the inequality
$\rho \gtrsim 5.8$. This in turn implies that
the leptogenesis regime in the model we are considering
cannot be resonant. Indeed, as can be shown,
for $\rho\gtrsim 3.7$ we have
$M_1-M_2\gg \Gamma_1=
\tfrac{(\tilde{Y}_\nu \tilde{Y}_\nu^\dagger)_{11} M_1}{8\pi}$,
the smallest heavy Majorana neutrino mass splitting $(M_1 - M_2)$
being by at least two orders of magnitude larger
than $\Gamma_1$. Thus,
the condition of resonant leptogenesis \cite{Pilaftsis:1997jf}
$(M_1-M_2)\sim \Gamma_1$, is not satisfied in the model under discussion.
The CP-asymmetry generated in the lepton charge $L_{l}$
by neutrino and sneutrino decays, $l = e,\mu,\tau$,
is~\cite{Davidson:2008bu}:
\begin{align}
\epsilon_i^{l}=&\frac{1}{8\pi}\frac{1}{(\tilde{Y}_\nu \tilde{Y}_\nu^\dagger)_{ii}}\sum_{j\neq i} {\rm Im}[ (\tilde{Y}_\nu)_{j l}(\tilde{Y}_\nu)_{i l }^\star (\tilde{Y}_\nu \tilde{Y}_\nu^\dagger)_{ji}] f ( \tfrac{m_i}{m_j} )\nonumber\\
&+\frac{1}{8\pi}\frac{1}{(\tilde{Y}_\nu \tilde{Y}_\nu^\dagger)_{ii}}\sum_{j\neq i} {\rm Im }[ (\tilde{Y}_\nu)_{jl }(\tilde{Y}_\nu)_{i l}^\star (\tilde{Y}_\nu \tilde{Y}_\nu^\dagger)_{ij} ] \frac{m_j^2}{m_j^2-m_i^2}~,\label{epsilon}
\end{align}
where
\begin{align}
f(x)=-x \left( \frac{2}{x^2-1}+\text{log}(1+\frac{1}{x^2}) \right)~.
\end{align}
The second term in eq.~\eqref{epsilon} corresponds to the self-energy diagram
with an inverted fermion line in the loop. It would vanish when we sum over $\alpha$,
and we would end up with the same formula as in the one flavour case
\begin{align}
\epsilon_i=\sum_l \epsilon_i^l =\frac{1}{8\pi}\sum_{j\neq i}\frac{ {\rm Im}[(\tilde{Y}_\nu\tilde{Y}_\nu^\dagger)_{ji}^2]}{(\tilde{Y}_\nu\tilde{Y}_\nu^\dagger)_{ii}} f(\tfrac{m_i}{m_j})~.
\end{align}
In the basis where the charged lepton and the right handed neutrino mass matrices are diagonal, we have
\begin{align}
\tilde{Y}_\nu&= (U_{\text{GR}}P^{-1})^\dagger (Y_\nu+\delta Y_\nu)U_e\nonumber\\
&= y_1^n\left(
\begin{array}{ccc}
-\frac{\left(s^e_{12} \text{e}^{\text{i} \delta_{12}^e}+\sqrt{3+\sqrt{5}} c^e_{12}\right) }{\sqrt{5+\sqrt{5}}} & \frac{\text{e}^{-\text{i} \delta_{12}^e} \left(c^e_{12} \text{e}^{\text{i} \delta_{12}^e}-\sqrt{3+\sqrt{5}} s^e_{12}\right) }{\sqrt{5+\sqrt{5}}} & \frac{1}{\sqrt{5+\sqrt{5}}} \\
\frac{\text{e}^{\frac{\text{i} \phi_2}{2}} \left(\left(5+\sqrt{5}\right) \text{e}^{\text{i} \delta_{12}^e} s^e_{12}-2 \sqrt{10} c^e_{12}\right) }{2 \sqrt{5 \left(5+\sqrt{5}\right)}} & -\frac{\text{e}^{\frac{\text{i} \phi_2}{2}-\text{i} \delta_{12}^e} \left(\left(5+\sqrt{5}\right) c^e_{12} \text{e}^{\text{i}\delta_{12}^e}+2 \sqrt{10} s^e_{12}\right) }{2\ 5^{3/4} \sqrt{1+\sqrt{5}}} & -\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{1+\frac{1}{\sqrt{5}}} \text{e}^{\frac{\text{i} \phi_2}{2}} \\
-\frac{\text{e}^{\frac{1}{2} \text{i} (2 \delta_{12}^e+\phi_3)} s^e_{12} }{\sqrt{2}} & \frac{c^e_{12} \text{e}^{\frac{\text{i} \phi_3}{2}} }{\sqrt{2}} & -\frac{\text{e}^{\frac{\text{i} \phi_3}{2}} }{\sqrt{2}} \\
\end{array}
\right)\nonumber\\
&+ y_1^n c \, \text{e}^{\text{i} \gamma}\left(
\begin{array}{ccc}
-\frac{ \left(c^e_{12}-\sqrt{3+\sqrt{5}} \text{e}^{\text{i} \delta_{12}^e} s^e_{12}\right)}{\sqrt{5+\sqrt{5}}} & -\frac{ \text{e}^{-\text{i} \delta_{12}^e} \left(\sqrt{3+\sqrt{5}} c^e_{12} \text{e}^{\text{i} \delta_{12}^e}+s^e_{12}\right)}{\sqrt{5+\sqrt{5}}} & 0 \\
\frac{ \text{e}^{\frac{\text{i} \phi_2}{2}} \left(2 \sqrt{2} s^e_{12} \text{e}^{\text{i} \delta_{12}^e}+\sqrt{5} c^e_{12}+c^e_{12}\right)}{2 \sqrt{5+\sqrt{5}}} & \frac{ \text{e}^{\frac{\text{i} \phi_2}{2}-\text{i} \delta_{12}^e} \left(-2 \sqrt{2} c^e_{12} \text{e}^{\text{i} \delta_{12}^e}+\sqrt{5} s^e_{12}+s^e_{12}\right)}{2 \sqrt{5+\sqrt{5}}} & 0 \\
\frac{c^e_{12} \text{e}^{\frac{\text{i} \phi_3}{2}}}{\sqrt{2}} & \frac{ \text{e}^{\frac{\text{i} \phi_3}{2}-\text{i} \delta_{12}^e} s^e_{12}}{\sqrt{2}} & 0 \\
\end{array}
\right)~,\label{y}
\end{align}
where we use $U_e\simeq U_{12}$, and the abbreviations $\sin\theta_{12}^e=s^e_{12}$
and $\cos\theta_{12}^e=c^e_{12}$.
Here and in the following we have used the freedom to
redefine $Y_\nu$ by a global phase
to make $y_1^n > 0$ so that we find
\begin{align}
\tilde{Y}_\nu\tilde{Y}_\nu^\dagger&= P U_{\text{GR}}^{\text{T}}(Y_\nu Y_\nu^\dagger+Y_\nu \delta Y_\nu^\dagger+\delta Y_\nu Y_\nu^\dagger)U_{\text{GR}} P^{-1}\\ \notag
&= \left({y_1^n}\right)^2 \mathds{1}
+c \left({y_1^n}\right)^2
\left(\begin{smallmatrix}
0 & \text{i} \sqrt{2}\sin\gamma \text{e}^{-\text{i}\phi_2/2} & -\sqrt{1+\frac{1}{\sqrt{5}}}\cos\gamma \text{e}^{-\text{i}\phi_3/2}\\
-\text{i} \sqrt{2}\sin\gamma \text{e}^{\text{i}\phi_2/2} & 0 & -\frac{2}{\sqrt{5+\sqrt{5}}}\cos\gamma \text{e}^{-\text{i}(\phi_3-\phi_2)/2}\\
-\sqrt{1+\frac{1}{\sqrt{5}}}\cos\gamma \text{e}^{\text{i}\phi_3/2}& -\frac{2}{\sqrt{5+\sqrt{5}}}\cos\gamma \text{e}^{\text{i}(\phi_3-\phi_2)/2}& 0\\
\end{smallmatrix}\right)~,\label{yy}
\end{align}
which we have expanded up to $\mathcal{O}(c)$.
We give next the expressions for the
CP-violating asymmetries
in the $l$ lepton charge $L_{l}$, generated in the decays
of the heavy Majorana neutrinos $N_1$, $N_2$ and $N_3$,
as calculated from eq.~\eqref{epsilon}:
\begin{align}
\epsilon_1^\tau&=\frac{c \left({y_1^n}\right)^2}{8 \pi}\frac{1}{\sqrt{10}} \left( \sin\gamma \cos{\phi_2} f(\tfrac{m_1}{m_2})-\sin\gamma \frac{m_2^2}{m_2^2-m_1^2}
+\cos\gamma \sin{\phi_3} f(\tfrac{m_1}{m_3}) \right)~, \\
\epsilon_2^\tau&=\frac{c \left({y_1^n}\right)^2}{8 \pi}\frac{1}{\sqrt{10}}\left( -\sin\gamma \cos{\phi_2} f(\tfrac{m_2}{m_1})+ \sin\gamma \frac{m_1^2}{m_1^2-m_2^2}
-\cos\gamma\sin{(\phi_3-\phi_2)} f(\tfrac{m_2}{m_3}) \right)~, \\
\epsilon_3^\tau&=\frac{c \left({y_1^n}\right)^2}{8 \pi}\frac{1}{\sqrt{10}}\cos\gamma \left( -\sin{\phi_3} f(\tfrac{m_3}{m_1})+ \sin{(\phi_3-\phi_2)} f(\tfrac{m_3}{m_2}) \right)~.
\end{align}
We see that to leading order, $\epsilon_i^\tau=0$ and hence
leptogenesis was not viable in the original model.
As $\tilde{Y}_\nu$ in leading order is unitary (except for an overall factor
$\left({y_1^n}\right)^2$), we have $\epsilon_i^2\equiv\epsilon_i^e+\epsilon_i^\mu=-\epsilon_i^\tau$
to leading order.
Notice that we compute the CP asymmetry generated by all
three heavy (s)neutrino decays
since the heavy neutrino spectrum is not very hierarchical in our case.
At the leptogenesis scale and values of $y^n_1$ of interest, the $\Delta L =
2$ processes are
negligible.
They would be important for a different setup with maximal
perturbative values of the Yukawa coupling of interest (say, for $y_1^n \cong 1$)
if the leptogenesis scale would be $10^{14}$ GeV (or for masses of the heavy Majorana
neutrinos of the order of $10^{14}$ GeV).
Thus, we can use the following analytic approximation
for the efficiency factors~\cite{Abada:2006ea},
which accounts for the $\Delta L=1$ interactions and
the decoherence effects:\\
\begin{align}
\eta(\tilde{m}_{il})\simeq\left(\left(\frac{\tilde{m}_{il}}{8.25\times 10^{-3}\text{ eV}}\right)^{-1}+\left(\frac{0.2\times 10^{-3} \text{ eV}}{\tilde{m}_{il}}\right)^{-1.16}\right)^{-1}~,
\end{align}
where
\begin{eqnarray}
\tilde{m}_{il}=\frac{v_u^2|(\tilde{Y}_\nu)_{il}|^2 }{M_i}~,
\end{eqnarray}
where we introduce another index $i$, $i = 1,2,3$, to label the
correspondence to the $i$-th heavy (s)neutrino and $l=e,\mu,\tau$.
If we only keep leading order term in $\tilde{m}_{il}$, we will
have $\tilde{m}_{i2}\equiv\tilde{m}_{ie}+\tilde{m}_{i\mu}=\frac{v_u^2{(y_1^n)}^2}{M_i}-\tilde{m}_{i\tau}$.
We list the washout mass parameters as follows
\begin{align}
\tilde{m}_{1\tau}&=\frac{1}{5+\sqrt{5}}\frac{v_u^2{(y_1^n)}^2}{M_1}~,\\
\tilde{m}_{2\tau}&=\frac{1}{4} \left(1+\frac{1}{\sqrt{5}}\right)\frac{v_u^2{(y_1^n)}^2}{M_2}~,\\
\tilde{m}_{3\tau}&=\frac{1}{2}\frac{v_u^2{(y_1^n)}^2}{M_3}~.
\end{align}
We do not include the higher order terms $\mathcal{O}(c)$
in the expressions for $\tilde{m}_{il}$
because they generate subleading insignificant corrections.
\begin{figure}
\centering
\includegraphics[scale=0.7]{plots/y_t2}\\
\phantom{a}
\includegraphics[scale=0.7]{plots/y_t}
\caption{
The single asymmetries $Y_1, Y_2, Y_3$ and the total
asymmetry $Y_B$. In the upper plot we use $c=0.05 \approx \theta_C^2$,
$\gamma=2k\pi ~(k=0,\pm1,\pm2,...)$, $v_u=246$~GeV, $y_1^n=0.1$,
$|X|=10^{13}~\text{GeV}$ and in the lower plot we use
$c=5.8 \cdot 10^{-3} \approx \theta_C^5$,
$\gamma=\pi/2 + 2k\pi$, $v_u=246$~GeV, $y_1^n=0.1$,
$|X|=7.2 \cdot 10^{12}~\text{GeV}$.
The horizontal green bands correspond
to the 3$\sigma$ region for the observed value for
$|Y_B|=(8.58\pm0.22) \times 10^{-11}$, where we multiply for
the 3$\sigma$ region the 1$\sigma$ error
for the sake of simplicity by a factor of three.
}
\label{fig:y_t}
\end{figure}
The baryon asymmetry generated by each heavy neutrino
decay is~\cite{Pascoli:2006ci}
\begin{eqnarray}
Y_i\simeq-3\times 10^{-3}\epsilon_i^\tau \left(\eta\left(\frac{494}{761}\tilde{m}_{i\tau }\right)-\eta\left(\frac{541}{761}\tilde{m}_{i2}\right)\right),
\end{eqnarray}
and the total baryon asymmetry is
\begin{eqnarray}
Y_B=\sum_iY_i,~ i=1,2,3.
\end{eqnarray}
Notice that we use an incoherent sum over the asymmetry generated by each
heavy (s)neutrino.
This approximation corresponds, in particular, to neglecting
the wash-out effects due to the lighter heavy Majorana neutrinos
$N_{2,3}$ in the asymmetry generated by the heaviest Majorana
neutrino $N_1$. Thus, we effectively assume that the indicated
wash-out effects cannot reduce drastically the asymmetry
produced in the $N_1$ decays. Since the masses of
$N_{2,3}$ and $N_1$ in the model we are considering
differ at most by a factor of 5, we can expect
that at least for some ranges of values of the masses
of $N_1$ and $N_{2,3}$ the wash-out effects under discussion
will be subdominant, i.e., will lead to a reduction
of the asymmetry $Y_1$ at most by a factor of 3.
Such a reduction will still allow a generation of $Y_{\rm B}$
compatible with the observations. Accounting quantitatively
for the wash-out effects of interest requires
solving numerically the system of Boltzmann equations
describing the evolution of the $N_{1,2,3}$ number
densities and of the asymmetries $Y_{1,2,3}$ in the
Early Universe. Performing such a calculation is beyond the scope
of the present work; it will be done elsewhere.
A priori, we do not know the value of
$c \, \text{e}^{\text{i}\gamma}$ introduced in
the NLO operator in eq.~\eqref{eqn:Noperator}.
We will see in the next section that
the low energy observables combined with $Y_B$ will
give us information on its value.
For now, as interesting cases used for illustration,
we plot $Y_B$ for some special
values of the parameters in Fig.~\ref{fig:y_t}.
The first set/upper plot will turn out to be
not realistic but it is still interesting
because here we can see clearly, that the Majorana
phases of the heavy right handed
neutrinos are the only sources for CP violation and
sufficient to generate $Y_B$ via leptogenesis.
In this case the sign flip of $Y_1$ and
$Y_2$ is due to the loop functions. The sign of $\sin\phi_i, i=2,3$
can be inferred
from the ``right sign" observation of $Y_B$. The second set/lower
plot is inspired by
the numerical results later on. Leptogenesis is still
successful although there $c$ is chosen much smaller than
in the first set, since we
receive contribution from the $\sin\gamma$ term, where
the enhancement from the loop
functions $f(m_1/m_2)$ and $f(m_2/m_1)$ are included. Specifically, we have
$f(m_1/m_2)\simeq-30 f(m_1/m_3)$ for $\rho=7$. In both cases $Y_B$ is dominated
by $Y_1$. The main difference
between $Y_1$ and $Y_2$ is the efficiency factor:
$\eta|_{Y_1}/\eta|_{Y_2}\simeq 5$ for $\rho = 7$. $Y_3$ suffers from
a strong washout in the first case and is zero in the second case due to $\cos\gamma=0$.
The NLO contribution can be regarded as
an expansion in powers of $\theta_C$ in both cases.
\section{Phenomenology: Numerical Results}
In this section we discuss the numerical results of a parameter scan. The analytical
results give a first impression of the general behaviour of all the observables but
since there are several parameters involved which interplay non-trivially we made a
random scan of the parameter space with certain assumptions to prove
that our model can simultaneously fulfill all the constraints. The structure of this
part follows the structure of the previous section.
\subsection{Masses and Mixing Angles}
For our numerical scan we follow closely the method as described in
\cite{Gehrlein:2014wda}. Most importantly for the parameters describing
the quark and charged lepton sector we used the fit results given there.
This implies that we use here $\tan \beta = 30$ and $M_{\text{SUSY}} = 1$~TeV.
In our previous model we had to scan over four real parameters (two moduli
$|X|$ and $|Y|$, two phases $\phi$ and $\delta_{12}^e$) in the neutrino sector.
In addition to these we have now
scanned as well over the modulus $c$ and the phase $\gamma$.
And now we have included in our scan as additional constraint
\cite{Ade:2013zuv, Bennett:2012zja}
\begin{equation}
Y_B = (8.58 \pm 0.22) \times 10^{-11} \;,
\end{equation}
where we multiply for the 3$\sigma$ region the 1$\sigma$ error
for the sake of simplicity by a factor of three. For the calculation
of $Y_B$ we use the formulas from section~\ref{sec:AnalyticalLeptogenesis}.
\begin{figure}
\centering
\includegraphics[scale=0.49]{plots/Finalth23th13NH} \hspace{0.7cm}
\includegraphics[scale=0.49]{plots/Finalth12th13NH}
\includegraphics[scale=0.49]{plots/Finalp1th13NH} \hspace{0.7cm}
\includegraphics[scale=0.49]{plots/Finalp2th13NH}
\includegraphics[scale=0.49]{plots/Finaldth13NH} \hspace{0.7cm}
\includegraphics[scale=0.49]{plots/FinalDm31sqDm21sqNH}
\caption{
Results of our numerical parameter scan.
Blue (red) points are in agreement within 3$\sigma$ (1$\sigma$) of the low energy
neutrino masses and mixings and $Y_B$ in our model.
The allowed experimental 3$\sigma$ (1$\sigma$) regions are
limited by blue (red) dashed lines. The black dashed lines represent the 1$\sigma$
range for the not directly measured CP phase $\delta$ from the global
fit \cite{Gonzalez-Garcia:2014bfa}.
}
\label{fig:mixing_parameters}
\end{figure}
Before we come to our results for the normal ordering we want to
comment briefly on the inverted ordering. In our numerical scan
we were not able to find any points in agreement within 3$\sigma$
with all the mentioned observables. We restricted $c \leq 0.2$
and neglected points where due to a fine-tuned cancellation
the NLO corrections were artificially enhanced.
Hence, we conclude that this ordering
is still excluded like in the original model.
The results of our scan for the masses and mixing angles is shown in
Fig.~\ref{fig:mixing_parameters} where the careful reader might note
first that now we have as well found parameter points that are in agreement
within 1$\sigma$ with all observables. That seems to be surprising since
we have added here an additional constraint and apart from this expect rather
small deviations from the original model. But there are two things coming together: First of all,
due to the correction we can now allow for smaller values of $\theta_{23}^{\text{PMNS}}$
down to about $44^\circ$ and furthermore we use here the updated results
from the nu-fit collaboration \cite{Gonzalez-Garcia:2014bfa} which allows
for $\theta_{23}^{\text{PMNS}} = 45^\circ$ even at 1$\sigma$.
\begin{figure}
\centering
\includegraphics[scale=0.55]{plots/FinalmeeNH}
\caption{
Prediction for the effective neutrino mass $m_{ee}$ accessible in neutrinoless double beta decay
experiments as a function of the lightest neutrino mass $m_{1}$.
The allowed experimental 3$\sigma$ (1$\sigma$) regions for the masses and mixing angles
in the case of normal ordering are limited by blue (red) dashed lines.
Blue (red) points are in agreement within 3$\sigma$ (1$\sigma$) of the low energy
neutrino masses and mixings and $Y_B$ in our model.
The grey region on the right side shows the bounds on the
lightest mass from cosmology \cite{Ade:2013zuv} and the grey region in the upper part displays the upper
bound on the effective mass from the EXO experiment \cite{Albert:2014awa}.
The red, straight lines represent the sensitivity of GERDA phase I respectively GERDA phase II \cite{Smolnikov:2008fu}.
}
\label{fig:mee_plot}
\end{figure}
The second thing to note is that now the correlations between $\theta_{13}^{\text{PMNS}}$
and the phases is much weaker which can be explained by the fact
that now we have on top another complex parameter in the game.
But still the phases are not in arbitrary ranges but we find
\begin{align}
\delta &\in [47 ^{\circ}, 104^{\circ}] ~\text{or}~ [250 ^{\circ}, 316^{\circ}] \;, \\
\alpha_1 &\in [0^{\circ}, 85^{\circ}] ~\text{or}~ [275^{\circ}, 360^{\circ}] \;, \\
\alpha_2 &\in [94 ^{\circ}, 269^{\circ}] \;,
\end{align}
For the Jarlskog invariant which determines the CP violation in neutrino oscillations we find values between $\pm$($0.026 - 0.035$).
The restricted ranges for the phases imply of course also restrictions
on the predictions for neutrinoless double beta decay, see Fig.~\ref{fig:mee_plot}.
But more restrictive in this case is nevertheless the constraint on the mass scale
where the lower bound is mostly determined by the mass sum rule. We obtain for the lightest neutrino mass $m_1$ values between 10.5 meV to 17.6 meV. In fact, our prediction for $m_{ee}$ is rather precise to be in the narrow
range from 2.3~meV to 9.2~meV. This is way below the sensitivity of any experiment in the near future so
that any evidence for neutrinoless double beta decay would rule out this model.
Related to the mass scale are as well two other observables. First of all there is the sum
of the neutrino masses
\begin{equation}
\sum m_{\nu} \in (0.074 - 0.089) ~\text{eV} \;,
\end{equation}
which might be determined from cosmology. So far
there is only an upper bound \cite{Ade:2013zuv}
\begin{equation}
\sum m_{\nu} < 0.23 \text{ eV,}
\end{equation}
which is well in agreement with our prediction.
The second observable is the kinematic mass $m_{\beta}$ as measured
in the KATRIN experiment \cite{Angrik:2005ep}
which is given as
\begin{equation}
m_{\beta}^{2}=m_{1}^{2}c_{12}^{2}c_{13}^{2}+m_{2}^{2}s_{12}^{2}c_{13}^{2}+m_{3}^{2}s_{13}^{2} \;.
\label{eq:katrin}
\end{equation}
Here we predict $m_{\beta} \approx (0.014-0.019)$~eV which is again way below the
projected reach of $m_{\beta} > 0.2$~eV.
\subsection{Leptogenesis}
In this section we show the results of our parameter scan
relevant for leptogenesis where we have implemented the
formulas given in section~\ref{sec:AnalyticalLeptogenesis} to
calculate the generated baryon asymmetry.
\begin{figure}
\centering
\includegraphics[scale=0.4]{plots/pr}
\caption{
The relation between $\phi$ and $\rho$ according to eq.~\eqref{alphaphi}
(black line), cf.~Fig.~\ref{fig:PhiAlpha}, and blue (red) points from our numerical scan in agreement
within 3$\sigma$ (1$\sigma$) of the low energy
neutrino masses and mixings and $Y_B$.
}
\label{fig:PhiAlphaCompare}
\end{figure}
Before we actually discuss the results for the asymmetry itself
we first want to note that the results from our analytical estimates
are quite good. For instance, in Fig.~\ref{fig:PhiAlphaCompare}
we show the relation between $\phi$ and $\rho$ from eq.~\eqref{alphaphi}
and from our numerical scan. The agreement is striking although in the analytical
estimates we have neglected for instance RGE effects which are nevertheless
not very large in the allowed mass range. The biggest difference is in the allowed
range for $\rho$. To avoid the resonance condition we only demanded $\rho \gtrsim 3.7$
while we find here $\rho \gtrsim 5.8$. But here not only the ratio of the mass squared
differences enter, but the two values of the mass squared differences independently.
\begin{figure}
\centering
\includegraphics[scale=0.49]{plots/Ya} \hspace{0.7cm}
\includegraphics[scale=0.49]{plots/Yp} \\
\includegraphics[scale=0.49]{plots/Yc} \hspace{0.7cm}
\includegraphics[scale=0.49]{plots/Yg} \\
\caption{
Results of our numerical scan for the total baryon asymmetry $Y_B$
in dependence of the four most relevant parameters.
Blue (red) points are in agreement within 3$\sigma$ (1$\sigma$) of the low energy
neutrino masses and mixings and $Y_B$ in our model.
}
\label{fig:YB_num}
\end{figure}
Now that we are convinced that our analytical estimates have been good
we discuss the dependence of $Y_B$ on the four most relevant parameters
as discussed in section~\ref{sec:AnalyticalLeptogenesis}. The biggest advantage
of our numerical scan over the analytical estimates is that it allows us to
use all available data on neutrino masses and mixing to constrain the allowed
parameter space.
We have already seen in Fig.~\ref{fig:PhiAlphaCompare}
that the values of $\rho$ get constrained which is again visible in Fig.~\ref{fig:YB_num}.
While a priori we only knew that $\rho \gtrsim 3.7$ and less than about 9 we now
see that only the range from $5.8$ to $8.5$ is allowed ($7.4 - 8.3$ at 1$\sigma$).
And since $\rho$ and $\phi$ are not independent but related via eq.~\eqref{alphaphi},
the phase $\phi$ gets constrained as well to the range $[-1.2;1.2]$ ($[-0.5;0.7]$ at
1$\sigma$).
The new parameters $c$ and $\gamma$ are nevertheless more interesting than
$\rho$ and $\phi$ which are mostly constrained by the
neutrino masses and for which we would have found similar results
already in the previous model. In Fig.~\ref{fig:YB_num} we have shown
the dependence of $Y_B$ on this new parameters.
The first thing to note, is that $c$ is indeed a small parameter in the range
from $0.7 \cdot 10^{-3}$ to $4.9 \cdot 10^{-3}$. From the
model building point of view such a small value is justified. Remember
that the leading order Yukawa coupling is a dimension three
operator in the
superpotential while the correction proportional to $c$ is coming from a
dimension seven operator.
Also note that alone from a constraint on $Y_B$
$c$ could have been much larger or smaller depending of course on the
value of $\gamma$ and the other
parameters. This is different here because the mixing angles get corrections
of order $c$ and this implies the constraint shown here.
Finally, note that the allowed range for $\gamma$ is only weakly constrained.
Nevertheless, it is interesting that the sign of $Y_B$ is completely determined by $\gamma$.
This is somewhat surprising because in our estimates from section~\ref{sec:AnalyticalLeptogenesis}
the sign of $\epsilon^\tau$ depends on other parameters which could induce a sign flip,
which can be seen for instance in the upper plot of Fig.~\ref{fig:y_t}. But
after applying all experimental constraints the correlation is striking.
Combined with the analytic analysis, we see that this correlation is a result
of the fact that $Y_B$ is dominated by $Y_1$, which is again dominated
by the first term in $\epsilon_1^\tau$, where $\cos\phi_2$ is negative
and $f(m_1/m_2)$ is positive. Neglecting the subdominant terms,
we have $Y_B\propto\sin\gamma$.
The analytical estimates for the efficiency factors we
are using provide results with an estimated precision of (20-30)$\%$ compared
to the full numerical results solving the Boltzmann equations.
This is more than sufficient for the purposes of our study.
The other predictions for the light neutrino masses and mixing parameters
would only mildly change because they are mostly governed by the leading order
values (a 30\% correction to $c$ would have only little impact on them).
It is also worth mentioning that
the complex Yukawa and the Majorana phases are both necessary
CP-violating sources to generate a successful baryon asymmetry
via leptogenesis while in accordance with all the low energy
constraints. It is also noticeable that $Y_B$ would be
strongly suppressed if $\cos\phi_2 \cong 0$. As it
follows from Fig.~\ref{fig:PhiAlpha}, values of $\cos\phi_2 \cong 0$
are excluded in the model we are considering since
$\cos\phi_2$ can have values only in a narrow interval
around $-1$, namely, $(-1, -0.95)$ for $\rho\gtrsim 5.8$,
which also means that the Majorana phases contribute maximally
to the asymmetry. In order to investigate the role of the Dirac
phase we need a different parametrisation of the neutrino
Yukawa coupling to see the relation explicitly, which is beyond the
scope of the current work.
\section{Summary and Conclusions}
In this paper we have revised the SU(5)~$\times$~A$_5$ golden ratio
GUT flavour model from \cite{Gehrlein:2014wda}
with the aim to include as well successful leptogenesis. In the
original setup this was
not possible. As it turns out we only have to add two
additional pairs of messenger
fields but no additional symmetries or flavon fields to do this.
We find that this induces a small correction to the neutrino Yukawa matrix,
which can generate a sizeable baryon asymmetry,
but as well implies some modifications for the predictions
of the masses and mixing angles
of the original model. In an extensive numerical scan
we could show that we can simultaneously
accommodate successfully the observed neutrino masses,
mixing angles and possibly baryon asymmetry.
And even more our setup is so constrained that we
predict several correlations or ranges for
observables yet to be measured.
One of the most striking features of our original model -
the sum rule for the neutrino
masses - remains valid up to a insignificant
correction. From this we can again derive a lower
bound for the lightest neutrino masses $m_1 \gtrsim 0.011$ eV
and rule out
the neutrino mass spectrum with inverted ordering.
This is already a very strong prediction.
Due to the additional complex parameter and the additional
constraint on $Y_B$
the allowed ranges for $\alpha_2$ has
shrunk from $ 70^{\circ}-290^{\circ}$ in the original model
to $94^{\circ}-269^{\circ}$. Whereas the allowed
regions for $\alpha_1$ and $\delta$ remain similar
compared to the original model. Namely, we find
now $\alpha_1$ to be in $0^{\circ}-85^{\circ}$ or
$275^{\circ}-360^{\circ}$ and $\delta$ to be in $47^{\circ}-105^{\circ}$
or $250^{\circ}-316^{\circ}$.
The strong correlation between $\theta_{13}$ and
the Majorana phases is now weakened due to the additional
complex parameter we introduced
in the model. It is also important to note,
that we find here points which are in agreement
within 1$\sigma$ with all neutrino observables.
This is due to the fact that we now allow for smaller
values of $\theta_{23}$ but we also use
here the updated fit results from \cite{Gonzalez-Garcia:2014bfa}
where maximal atmospheric mixing
is again allowed at the 1$\sigma$ level.
Nevertheless, a precise measurement of $\theta_{23}$ which
deviates significantly from maximal mixing can rule out the presented model.
Since we limit the allowed ranges for the CP violating
phases and the light neutrino masses we predict
as well the effective Majorana mass observable in neutrinoless double beta
decay to be in the narrow range ($2.3 - 9.2$)~meV.
This is beyond the reach of ongoing experiments and upcoming experiments
which will begin taking data in the near future,
but it will be certainly tested in the future.
For the baryon asymmetry $Y_B$ we find
in the approximation used to calculate it
good agreement with the most recent data and this is done
by only introducing one additional operator which involves
one new complex parameter with a modulus $c$ having a value
in the range $0.7 \cdot 10^{-3}$ to $4.9 \cdot 10^{-3}$.
The phase of this additional parameter
at the 3$\sigma$ level is not much constrained but it governs
the sign of $Y_B$.
What we did not discuss in the present article
is that some of the features of the original model,
like the Yukawa coupling ratios
$y_\tau/y_b \approx - 3/2$, remain valid in the modified model
implying non-trivial constraints on the
spectrum of the supersymmetric partners of the Standard Model particles.
In summary we have succeeded to modify the model from
\cite{Gehrlein:2014wda} to include
viable leptogenesis by only introducing a minimal correction.
The model presented here is, to our knowledge, the
first GUT $\text{A}_5$ golden ratio flavour model
in which it is possible to have successful leptogenesis.
All observables lie within the
measured ranges and for the not yet measured quantities
in the neutrino sector
(the type of the neutrino mass spectrum,
the absolute scale and the sum of the neutrino masses, the effective
Majorana mass in neutrinoless double beta decay, the CP
violation phases in the PMNS matrix),
we make predictions.
An appealing feature of the model is its rather small number
of parameters, which makes the model
very predictive and testable.
\section*{Acknowledgements}
The work of X.~Zhang was done during her visit of SISSA,
and it was supported by the graduate school of Peking University (grant
number
zzsq2014000091).
X.~Zhang would like to thank Prof. Petcov
for hospitality at SISSA, I.~Girardi, A.~Titov and
A.~J.~Stuart for discussions, and A.~J.~Stuart for sharing
his code on $A_5$ contractions. S.T.P. acknowledges very
useful discussions with E. Molinaro.
This work was supported in part by the European Union FP7
ITN INVISIBLES (Marie Curie Actions, PITN-GA-2011-289442-INVISIBLES),
by the INFN program on Theoretical Astroparticle Physics (TASP),
by the research grant 2012CPPYP7 ({\sl Theoretical Astroparticle Physics})
under the program PRIN 2012 funded by the
Italian MIUR and by the World Premier International Research Center
Initiative (WPI Initiative), MEXT, Japan (STP).
|
\section{Introduction}
Transparent conducting oxides (TCO) are widely used for electrodes
in solar energy and display technologies. \cite{ginley,kawazoe}
The most commonly used material is
Sn doped In$_2$O$_3$, known as ITO.
This is a stable material that can be
readily deposited in thin films and has excellent TCO performance.
However, there is interest in alternatives to ITO both because
of a desire to reduce the use of In and to identify
TCO materials with a range of other properties and functionalities.
\cite{minami}
For displays, high DC conductivity, low haze and high transparency for the
operating wavelength and viewing angle ranges are needed.
Transparency outside these ranges is not needed and
is often undesirable since
heating due to infrared transmission and ultraviolet photons can
degrade devices, e.g. in outdoor use.
We note that transparency below the absorber band gap is undesirable
in solar photovoltaic applications.
While light filters can be incorporated in various layers of a device
architecture, transparent conductors that also act as filters may be useful.
Perovskite
structure BaSnO$_3$ doped by trivalent cation substitutions for
Ba (e.g. La) and by Sb alloying on the Sn site
shows promise as an ITO alternative.
\cite{cava,singh-basno3,upadhyay,hadjarab,wang-basno3,kim,luo,liu2,kim2,
mizoguchi,mizoguchi-ba,fan,liu,singh3,mun,wadekar,sallis,scanlon,kim3}
Importantly, recent studies of high mobility La doped BaSnO$_3$ transparent
conducting films show transport properties that are still dominated by
extrinsic defects, specifically dislocations.
\cite{kim2,mun,wadekar}
The implication is that there remains considerable room
for even better conductivity with improvements in film perfection.
Recent studies suggested that $n$-type BaSnO$_3$ may have substantial
tunability, e.g. in the band gap via alloying and strain,
\cite{mizoguchi-ba,fan,liu,singh3}
but applications of strain tuning of BaSnO$_3$
have yet to be demonstrated.
Here we show that it is possible to tailor the spectral transmission
of BaSnO$_3$ by a dimensional reduction strategy.
We report first principles calculations for
doped BaSnO$_3$, in relation to
members of the Ruddlesden-Popper homologous series
derived from BaSnO$_3$ by periodic insertion of nominally
insulating BaO layers.
The first two members of the series
are known bulk equilibrium stable phases
in the BaO -- SnO$_2$ pseudobinary phase diagram
that are readily made using common methods.
\cite{wagner,hinatsu,green,kennedy,ropp,yamashita,stanulis}
Perhaps other phases can also be grown, in analogy
with the Sr-Ti-O system. \cite{lee}
This is also consistent with the Sr-Sn-O system, which has a known
Ruddlesden-Popper series. \cite{green2,fu}
Kamimura and co-workers have recently shown that members of the Sr-Sn-O
Ruddlesden-Popper series can show very different luminescence properties
when activated. \cite{kamimura}
Furthermore, the members of the Ba-Sn-O
Ruddlesden-Popper series have good in plane
lattice matches with each other and are presumably compatible with
each other in thin film form.
The experimental lattice parameters and spacegroups are
BaSnO$_3$, cubic, $Pm3m$ $a$=4.116 \AA,
\cite{vegas,maekawa,bevillon}
Ba$_2$SnO$_4$, body centered tetragonal, $I4/mmm$,
$a$=4.1411 \AA, $c$=13.2834 \AA, \cite{green} and
Ba$_3$Sn$_2$O$_7$, body centered tetragonal, $I4/mmm$,
$a$=4.129 \AA, $c$=21.460 \AA.
\cite{hinatsu}
As discussed below, we also did calculations for the next member
of the series, Ba$_4$Sn$_3$O$_{10}$, which is a phase that has
not been reported experimentally. For this we did calculations
both using a fully relaxed structure and a partially relaxed structure
in which the atomic coordinates were relaxed but the lattice parameters
were fixed to interpolated experimental values from the known phases.
The main first principles calculations were performed using the general
potential linearized augmented planewave (LAPW) method
\cite{singh-book} as implemented in the WIEN2k code.
We also did calculations to cross-check
using the VASP code with hybrid HSE06 functional
\cite{heyd,heyd1}
and the generalized gradient approximation of Perdew, Burke and Ernzerhof
(PBE-GGA). \cite{pbe}
For the LAPW calculations,
we used well converged basis sets including local orbitals for
the semicore states of the alkaline earth elements, the O 2$p$
state and the Sn $4d$ state. We used the standard LAPW basis sets
rather than the APW+lo method. \cite{sjo}
The LAPW sphere radii were 2.4 bohr, 2.25 bohr and 1.6 bohr for
Ba, Sn and O, respectively, and a basis set cut-off, $k_{max}$,
set by the criterion $R_{min}k_{max}$=7.0 was used, where $R_{min}$
is the O LAPW sphere radius.
We fixed the lattice parameters to the experimental values and relaxed the
internal atomic coordinates of the layered compounds using the
PBE-GGA.
Following the structure optimization, we did
electronic structure and optical calculations using the
modified Becke-Johnson type potential functional of Tran and Blaha, \cite{mbj}
denoted TB-mBJ in the following.
This potential gives band gaps in remarkably good accord with experiment
for a wide variety of simple semiconductors and insulators,
\cite{mbj,koller,singh1,kim-mbj,singh2}
including perovskite stannates.
\cite{fan}
We compared the TB-mBJ results for the undoped compounds with
HSE06 calculations as discussed below.
Doping by La was treated using the virtual crystal approximation.
The virtual crystal approximation
is an average potential approximation.
It goes beyond rigid bands, and specifically
includes composition
dependent distortions of the band structure.
The use of the virtual crystal approximation is supported by the fact
that in these compounds the highly electropositive elements, Ba and La,
are fully ionized and serve only to stabilize the structure and donate
charge to the conducting bands derived from Sn and O.
Ba$_3$Sn$_2$O$_7$ has two crystallographically distinct Ba sites,
{\em i.e.} the $2b$ perovskite-like site between the two SnO$_2$ layers
and the $4e$ rocksalt-like site in between the perovskite blocks (Fig.
\ref{structs}).
For this compound we performed calculations in which we did virtual
crystal with La on site $2b$, on site $4e$ and equally distributed
on the two sites. The results were practically the same, which supports
the validity of the virtual crystal approximation.
There have been a number of prior first principles studies of BaSnO$_3$
as well as the related perovskites, CaSnO$_3$ and SrSnO$_3$.
The Sn $s$ nature of the conduction band and its role in the good
conductivity of $n$-type doped BaSnO$_3$ were established early on.
\cite{singh-basno3}
This basic result was found in subsequent band structure calculations
with various methods.
\cite{kim2,mizoguchi,mizoguchi-ba,fan,liu,singh3,mun,wadekar,sallis,scanlon,kim3}
Large variation in the band gap between BaSnO$_3$, SrSnO$_3$ and CaSnO$_3$,
was found by Mizoguchi and co-workers \cite{mizoguchi}, and subsequently
discussed in terms of strain. \cite{fan,singh3}
The band structures with the TB-mBJ potential are shown in
Fig. \ref{bands}.
The calculated indirect gaps using the TB-mBJ potential are
2.82 eV, 4.22 eV and 3.53 eV for BaSnO$_3$, Ba$_2$SnO$_4$ and
Ba$_3$Sn$_2$O$_7$, respectively.
The calculated TB-mBJ band gap of bulk NaCl
structure BaO, lattice parameter 5.523 \AA, is 3.61 eV, indirect between
$X$ and $\Gamma$.
Two aspects that are immediately apparent from the band structures
are (1) the layered compounds show a dispersive $s$
band at the conduction band minimum similar to BaSnO$_3$ and (2)
the layered compounds show little dispersion in the $c$-axis
direction, so the layering is indeed strongly reflected in the
electronic structure. The band narrowing in the $c$-axis direction
is a kind of quantum confinement effect.
Table \ref{tab-gap} gives the band gaps as obtained with the PBE-GGA
functional, the
TB-mBJ potential and the HSE06 hybrid functional.
As may be seen there is a good agreement between the TB-mBJ
and the HSE06 results, while as usual the PBE-GGA underestimates gaps.
\begin{table}
\caption{Band gaps for the Ba-Sn-O Ruddlesden-Popper compounds
as obtained with the PBE-GGA functional, the
TB-mBJ potential and the HSE06 hybrid
functional.}
\begin{tabular}{lccc}
\hline
Compound & PBE-GGA (eV) & TB-mBJ (eV) & HSE06 (eV) \\
\hline
BaSnO$_3$ & 0.98 & 2.82 & 2.66 \\
Ba$_4$Sn$_3$O$_{10}$ & 1.61 & 3.24 & 3.21 \\
Ba$_3$Sn$_2$O$_{7}$ & 2.03 & 3.53 & 3.60 \\
Ba$_2$SnO$_{4}$ & 2.83 & 4.22 & 4.41 \\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\label{tab-gap}
\end{table}
Fig. \ref{plasma} gives the
in-plane plasma frequencies, $\Omega_p$ for $n$-type doping
as a function of doping in carriers per Sn.
Conductivity in metals and degenerately doped semiconductors
depends on the plasma frequency, $\sigma \propto \Omega_p^2\tau$
where $\tau$ is an effective inverse scattering rate.
As seen, if one assumes similar scattering rates,
the conductivity follows a perhaps
expected trend following the density of Sn ions ({\em i.e.} falling as the
concentration of insulating BaO increases).
Specifically, for in-plane conduction,
$\sigma$(BaSnO$_3$)$>$$\sigma$(Ba$_3$Sn$_2$O$_7$) $>$$\sigma$(Ba$_2$SnO$_4$).
The volumes per Sn are 69.73 \AA$^3$, 91.47 \AA$^3$ and 113.90 \AA$^3$,
for BaSnO$_3$, Ba$_3$Sn$_2$O$_7$ and Ba$_2$SnO$_4$, respectively.
The BaO layers, while not contributing to conduction, also would
not be expected to contribute to optical absorption, and therefore
the result suggests that the layered compounds could be good
TCO as well.
As discussed below, our optical calculations show
that this may be
the case for Ba$_3$Sn$_2$O$_7$ and higher members of the
series, but is not the case for
Ba$_2$SnO$_4$.
The good TCO behavior of BaSnO$_3$ can be understood
in terms of three main reasons: (1) The material can be effectively
doped $n$-type to high carrier concentrations, (2) It has
a highly dispersive Sn $s$ derived conduction band that leads
to high mobility and (3) there is a large gap
between the lowest conduction band at the
conduction band minimum (CBM), which is at $\Gamma$,
and the next conduction band at $\Gamma$.
The calculated absorption spectra for virtual crystal doped
BaSnO$_3$ are shown in Fig. \ref{BaSnO3-abs}.
As seen, the optical gap increases with carrier concentration. This
is a consequence both of the electrostatic effect of adding electrons
to a band (electrons added to
the Sn $s$ derived conduction band by doping provide
a repulsion to other electrons in this orbital raising the energy of the band),
and the increase in Fermi level within the band as electrons are added.
Here the Fermi level shift is the larger effect. For example, with
0.2 electrons per Sn, we obtain a Fermi level 1.99 eV above the conduction band
minimum in our virtual crystal calculations, while the indirect
gap between the valence band maximum and conduction band minimum increases
by only 0.14 eV. This latter increase is a non-rigid-band effect. In addition
to this band gap there are other small distortions of the band structure.
This is shown in Fig. \ref{bands-vc}.
The increase in apparent optical gap with La doping is possibly
consistent with optical absorption spectra of
BaSnO$_3$ and (Ba,La)SnO$_3$ obtained by Kim and co-workers,
\cite{kim2}
whose experimental spectra show such an increase.
However, in view of the broadening of the reported experimental
spectra with La addition further measurements would be desirable.
The band structures of Ba$_2$SnO$_4$ and Ba$_3$Sn$_2$O$_7$ do not show
large gaps above the CBM, but instead show other bands within 3 eV
of the CBM. These arise from the dimensional reduction, specifically
the strongly reduced hopping along the $k_z$, $c$-axis direction, which narrows
the conduction bands.
Additionally, in Ba$_3$Sn$_2$O$_7$, there are two perovskite layers
in the perovskite block, which leads to a band structure with
pairs of bands in the $k_z$=0 plane that are characterized by
even or odd symmetry
with respect to reflection in the BaO plane between the SnO$_2$ layers.
Such pairs of bands are then strongly connected by dipole transitions for
electric field polarization along the $c$-axis direction, but not for in-plane
polarization, {\em i.e.} not for light propagating along the $c$-axis
direction.
Other consequences of the dimensional reduction are a higher density
of states near the CBM corresponding to the near 2D electronic structure
(note the flatness of the lowest band along the $Z$-$\Gamma$ direction);
a 2D electronic structure has a high, constant density of states near
the band edge, while a 3D band structure has a lower initial density
of states, $N(E)\propto E^{1/2}$, with $E$ relative to the CBM.
This is clearly seen in the densities of states (DOS),
shown for the conduction bands in Fig. \ref{dos}.
In particular, the DOS for BaSnO$_3$ shows a smooth increase with
energy, while prominent steps corresponding to band onsets are present
for the layered compounds.
The consequence of this stepped DOS
is that in 2D the doping dependence of the Fermi level, $E_F$,
will be weaker, with the result that higher doping levels might be
possible, and that following arguments given elsewhere the thermopower
will be strongly enhanced. \cite{hicks,chen} For the conductivity,
$\sigma$ in plane is generically expected to remain similar to the 3D
compound at the expense of a very strong
reduction in $c$-axis conductivity. This means that use of Ba$_2$SnO$_4$
or Ba$_3$Sn$_2$O$_7$ films as conducting oxides would require the production
of textured films.
The optical conductivities of the doped compounds
are given in Fig. \ref{cond}, showing both in-plane and out-of-plane
directions.
These plots include a Drude
contribution, with the Drude weight from the calculated $\Omega_p$
and an assumed broadening, $\gamma$=0.1.
Although undoped Ba$_2$SnO$_4$ is the compound with the highest band
gap, it shows strong optical conductivity (and absorption)
in the visible for light
polarization in the $c$-axis direction, but low optical conductivity
for polarization in the plane, which is the case for normal incidence.
This might suggest that Ba$_2$SnO$_4$ could be used as a transparent
conductor for normal incident light. This may, however, be misleading,
since in reality the disorder would lead to
symmetry breaking, which could then result in some absorption for normal
incident light as well.
In any case, this absorption is a consequence of interband transitions
from the lowest conduction band to higher bands near the zone
center.
Ba$_3$Sn$_2$O$_7$ shows different behavior. It displays very strong
interband transitions for $c$-axis polarized light in the infrared and red
(below $\sim$ 2 eV).
These lead to high peaks in the optical conductivity for $c$-axis
polarization even at moderate doping. This polarization involves
dipole transitions between bands with opposite reflection symmetry
in the plane between the SnO$_2$ layers as mentioned above.
The band making up the CBM
has even reflection symmetry, with an onset of odd
reflection symmetry states 1.7 eV above the CBM.
Importantly,
Ba$_3$Sn$_2$O$_7$ does not show significant absorption in the visible
above 2 eV
for either light polarization, but would be expected to be
strongly absorbing below 2 eV for electric field
out of plane and in the presence of disorder for both polarizations.
More generally, the insertion of BaO layers into BaSnO$_3$ breaks
the translational symmetry along the $c$-axis direction. This then
allows dipole transitions for electric field polarization along the $c$-axis
since the bands folded back to $\Gamma$ are from different original
crystal momenta along $k_z$ (note that the dipole operator is equivalent
to a momentum operator).
As mentioned, we also did calculations for hypothetical Ba$_4$Sn$_3$O$_{10}$,
which is the next member of the homologous series. For this, we used lattice
parameters based on interpolation using the experimental lattice
parameters of BaSnO$_3$, Ba$_4$SnO$_4$ and Ba$_3$Sn$_2$O$_7$.
We then fully relaxed the internal atomic coordinates within this cell.
The lattice parameters
used were from interpolation, $a$=4.125 \AA, and $c$=29.637 \AA.
Full relaxation with the PBE-GGA yielded slightly larger lattice parameters
of $a$=4.202 \AA, and $c$=30.170 \AA,
also with relaxation of the internal atomic
coordinates. The calculated band gaps are 3.24 eV
for the interpolated structure
and 2.64 eV
for the larger volume cell with fully relaxed lattice parameters.
The band structure for the interpolated lattice parameters is shown in
Fig. \ref{bands}. The in-plane plasma frequency and density of states
and optical conductivities are shown along with those of the
other compounds. As seen, its properties generally interpolate between
those of BaSnO$_3$ and Ba$_3$Sn$_2$O$_7$.
We calculated the energetics of the known compounds, along with those of
hypothetical compounds based on addition of an extra BaO
layer between the perovskite blocks in the series, {\em i.e.}
Ba$_5$Sn$_3$O$_{11}$, and the next member of the series, Ba$_5$Sn$_4$O$_{13}$.
The resulting convex hull for the BaO-SnO$_2$ pseudobinary is shown in
Fig. \ref{hull}.
These calculations were done using the PBE-GGA with fully relaxed structures,
to get a consistent set of energies.
As seen, there is a strong tendency towards compound formation in this
pseudobinary. The stable compounds are BaSnO$_3$, Ba$_2$SnO$_4$ and
Ba$_3$Sn$_2$O$_7$.
The other compounds
are above the convex hull, meaning that they are not predicted to be
ground state phases in this pseudobinary. However, they are very close
to the hull, within 0.02 eV/atom
($\sim$ 240 K).
This is certainly below the uncertainty of our density
functional calculations.
Therefore what can be concluded is that these phases are either on
or slightly above the convex hull.
Based on these results it is likely that they
can be stabilized in thin films where kinetic constraints may prevent
phase separation, \cite{hornbostel}
and perhaps also under other conditions.
Experimental results have shown that heavily $n$-type
doped BaSnO$_3$ is promising as a high performance TCO
with good conductivity and optical transparency in the visible.
Layered perovskite variants of this material can be readily
made, and it is likely that they can be layered with the
cubic perovskite material based on the similar chemistry and in-plane
lattice parameter.
In fact, it may well be that conventionally made
films incorporate some fraction of these phases.
The present calculations show that these phases would not necessarily be
harmful for the DC conductivity especially if a high degree of texture
is present.
However, we find that
the presence of doped Ba$_2$SnO$_4$ would be harmful to the
visible light transparency. It is possible in fact that some of the
variable results seen in experiments are due to the presence of
different amounts of Ba$_2$SnO$_4$ related to
various amounts of Sn deficiency.
It would be desirable to minimize the occurrence of this phase
to improve the transparency.
On the other hand,
the occurrence of bi-layer Ba$_3$Sn$_2$O$_7$
and higher members of the series such as Ba$_4$Sn$_3$O$_{10}$
may not be
detrimental and may add useful functionality, such
as energy selective filtering.
We note that a related concept was recently developed and exploited to produce
low loss, room temperature tunable dielectrics based on SrTiO$_3$,
specifically using the Sr$_{n+1}$Ti$_n$O$_{3n+1}$
Ruddlesden-Popper phases with $n$$\geq$3. \cite{lee}
The present results indicate that
it will be interesting to experimentally explore the incorporation of
Ruddlesden-Popper phases into n-type Ba-Sn-O TCO films as a functional
tuning parameter.
YL and YM acknowledge funding support from the Natural Science Foundation
of China (Grant No. 11025418).
LZ acknowledges funding from the Recruitment Program of Global Experts
(the Thousand Young Talents Plan).
Work at ORNL was supported by the Department of Energy, Office of Science,
Basic Energy Sciences,
Materials Sciences and Engineering Division.
|
\section{Introduction}
Integral-equation methods are a very powerful tool to
determine the thermodynamics and the liquid structure of simple fluids
\cite{HansenMcDonald,Attard-02}. They rely on different approximate
closure relations which, supplemented by the
Ornstein-Zernike (OZ) equation, allow a direct and numerically fast
determination of the pair correlation functions as well as of
thermodynamic quantities like pressure,
compressibility, chemical potential, $\ldots$
For simple fluids these methods cannot compete nowadays with
Monte Carlo and molecular-dynamics simulations. Nonetheless, they have the
advantage of providing reasonably accurate estimates of
thermodynamic quantities with a very limited effort, and they are
therefore a very valuable tool when the system under investigation
depends on many parameters,
for instance in the case of multicomponent systems. Moreover, they are
still very useful for the analysis of systems for which
atomistic simulations are particularly slow, for instance in glassy systems;
see, e.g., Refs.~\cite{MP-99,PZ-10,BHP-14}.
Liquid-state integral equations have also been extensively used to compute
fluid-fluid phase-coexistence lines. In the density region in which
the system demixes, integral equations may not converge, or may converge
to physically unacceptable solutions. The relation between the boundary
of this nonconvergence region (we will call it termination line)
and the binodal and the spinodal curves
characterizing the two-phase unstable region
has been the subject of many studies,
see, e.g., Refs.~\cite{CS-83,Belloni-93,RVL-96,SL-05}.
In particular, it has been shown that, except in the case of very
simple approximations, thermodynamical quantities
do not show any particular divergence on this line, hence it
cannot be taken as an approximate estimate of
the spinodal line. However, it is usually assumed that it is somewhat close to
the line where phase separation occurs.
In this paper we wish to investigate the reliability of integral-equation
methods for the determination of the phase diagrams of typical
coarse-grained models of soft-matter systems. We
consider here a binary mixture of soft and hard spheres
of different sizes with an intrinsic nonadditive nature.
Although we take specific pair
potentials, appropriate to describe, in a coarse-grained fashion,
a binary system of hard-sphere colloids and long polymers under good-solvent
conditions \cite{Likos-01,HL-02}, the conclusions
should apply to a general class of soft-matter systems
that can be modelled as mixtures of soft and/or hard spheres,
interacting via short-range potentials
\cite{LFH-00,DLL-02,FHL-03,PSCG-06,PP-14}.
The phase diagram of the
coarse-grained model has been accurately determined in
Ref.~\cite{DMPP-15}, by means of Monte Carlo simulations, for different
values of the polymer-to-colloid size ratio.
Here, we investigate the same problem by using
integral-equation methods. We employ the hypernetted-chain (HNC) ,
the Percus-Yevick (PY), the Rogers-Young (RY), and the reference HNC (RHNC)
closures \cite{HansenMcDonald,RY-84,RA-79,ELLAL-84}. For each of them
we determine the termination line, whose position is then compared
with the Monte Carlo binodal with the purpose of understanding if
this line provides a reasonable approximation of the boundary of the
two-phase region. For small polymer densities, we will also be able to
compute by Monte Carlo simulations the bridge
functions---quantities that have an intrinsic interest
in liquid-state theories---which can then be
compared with the approximate ones considered in the different approaches.
The paper is organized as follows.
In Sec.~\ref{sec2} we define the model,
report the definitions of the different closures
we use, and the explicit expressions of the quantities that are
considered in the paper.
In Sec.~\ref{sec3} we present our results.
In Sec.~\ref{sec3.1} we determine the termination line for the different
closures for two different values of the polymer-to-colloid
size ratio $q$, $q = 0.5$ and $q=0.8$. In Sec.~\ref{sec3.2}
we compare the integral-equation
predictions for structure and thermodynamics with Monte Carlo results.
In Sec.~\ref{sec3.3} we determine the bridge functions with
Monte Carlo methods and compare them with
those used in the different integral-equation approaches.
In Sec.~\ref{sec3.4} we consider a novel approximation that uses the
Monte-Carlo determined bridge functions. Finally, in Sec.~\ref{sec4} we
draw our conclusions. Technical details are reported in Appendix
\ref{AppA}.
The explicit expressions of the potentials are reported in
Appendix \ref{AppB}.
\section{Definitions} \label{sec2}
\subsection{The model} \label{sec2.1}
\begin{figure}[b]
\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{cc}
\epsfig{file=Vpp.ps,width=4.8truecm,angle=-90}
\hspace{0truecm} &
\epsfig{file=Vcp.ps,width=4.8truecm,angle=-90}
\hspace{0truecm} \\
\end{tabular}
\end{center}
\caption{Left: polymer-polymer pair potential $\beta V_{pp}(b)$
as a function of $b = r/R_g$; right: polymer-colloid
potential $\beta V_{cp}(b;q)$ as a function of $b = r/R_g$
for $q = 0.5,0.8,1$. For $q = 0.8$ and $q = 0.5$, we assume
$V_{cp}(b;q) = \infty$ for $ b < 0.90$, 1.91, respectively.
}
\label{pair-potentials}
\end{figure}
We consider a mixture of mutually interacting
hard spheres of radius $R_c$ and of
soft particles with a typical interaction range $R_g$.
Specifically, we consider here a set of potentials which are
appropriate to describe a system of hard-sphere colloids of
size $R_c$ and linear homopolymers in good solvent of radius of
gyration $R_g$, after tracing out the monomer degrees of freedom and
replacing each chain with a particle coinciding with its center of mass.
The coarse-grained model is accurate only if polymers are dilute,
i.e., for $\Phi_p = 4 \pi N_p R^3_g/(3 V)\mathrel{\spose{\lower 3pt\hbox{$\mathchar"218$} 1$
($N_p$ is the number of colloids in the volume $V$),
and if the polymer-to-colloid size ratio $q=R_g/R_c$
satisfies $q\mathrel{\spose{\lower 3pt\hbox{$\mathchar"218$} 1$ \cite{DPP-14-colloids,DMPP-15}
(a discussion of the accuracy of
the model, with a comparison with full-monomer results is presented
in Ref.~\cite{DMPP-15}).
Polymer-colloid solutions have been
extensively studied \cite{Poon-02,FS-02,TRK-03,MvDE-07,FT-08,ME-09},
because of their rich phase diagram, which presents fluid-fluid and fluid-solid
coexistence lines, and because of their technological relevance \cite{LT-11}.
In this paper, we will not be interested in using the model to predict
their phase behavior. Rather, we take it as a
typical soft-matter system and use it as reference
model for which we can study the predictivity of the
different closures that are typically used in integral-equation studies.
We will consider three different values of $q = R_g/R_c$, $q = 0.5, 0.8$, and 1.
The corresponding pair potentials have been determined in several papers
\cite{LBHM-00,LBMH-02-a,LBMH-02-b,PH-05,PH-06,DPP-13-depletion}. Here
we shall use the accurate scaling-limit results of
Refs.~\cite{PH-05,DPP-13-depletion}.
They are reported for completeness
in Appendix \ref{AppB} and shown in Fig.~\ref{pair-potentials}.
The polymer-polymer potential is essentially Gaussian with
$V_{pp}(b=0) \approx 1.8 k_B T$ at full overlap. On the other hand,
the nature of the polymer-colloid potential depends on $q$.
For $q\le 1$ the potential is expected to be
infinite at full overlap and very large for
$r \mathrel{\spose{\lower 3pt\hbox{$\mathchar"218$} R_c = R_g/q$. Then, it decays fast, with a tail that is small
for $r \mathrel{\spose{\lower 3pt\hbox{$\mathchar"218$} R_c + 2 R_g$. Note that we have not been able to
determine $\beta V_{cp}(b;q)$ in the small-$r$ region in which
$\beta V_{cp}(b;q) \mathrel{\spose{\lower 3pt\hbox{$\mathchar"218$} 10$. For these values of $r$ we simply assume
$\beta V_{cp}(b;q) = +\infty$ for $q = 0.5$ and $q = 0.8$. For $q = 1$
we performed a linear extrapolation.
\subsection{Closure relations} \label{sec2.2}
In the integral-equation approach the basic ingredients are the
pair correlation functions
$h_{\alpha\beta}(r)$ ($\alpha$ and $\beta$ label the two species) and the
direct correlation functions $c_{\alpha\beta}(r)$. They are related by
the Ornstein-Zernike (OZ) \cite{HansenMcDonald} relations
\begin{equation}
\hat{h}_{\alpha\beta} (k) = \hat{c}_{\alpha\beta}(k) +
\sum_\gamma \hat{c}_{\alpha\gamma}(k) \rho_\gamma \hat{h}_{\gamma\beta}(k),
\end{equation}
where we denote with $\hat{f}(k)$ the (three-dimensional) Fourier transform
of any function $f(r)$. To compute the quantities of interest,
the OZ relation must be
supplemented by a closure relation, which can be written in general form as
\begin{equation}
g_{\alpha\beta}(r) = e^{-\beta V_{\alpha\beta}(r)} \exp[h_{\alpha\beta}(r) -
c_{\alpha\beta}(r) + b_{\alpha\beta}(r)],
\label{def-bridge}
\end{equation}
where $V_{\alpha\beta}(r)$ are the pair potentials,
$g_{\alpha\beta}(r) = h_{\alpha\beta}(r) + 1$ is the pair distribution
function and $b_{\alpha\beta}(r)$ is the so-called bridge function. The latter
quantity cannot be computed exactly, hence we consider several different
approximations:
\begin{itemize}
\item[(i)]
Hypernetted chain (HNC) closure
\cite{HansenMcDonald}. We simply set $b_{\alpha\beta}(r) = 0$
for all $\alpha,\beta$.
This approximation is very accurate for soft potentials
\cite{HansenMcDonald}.
\item[(ii)]
Mixed HNC/Percus-Yevick (PY) closure. For hard spheres the PY closure relation
\cite{HansenMcDonald}
\begin{equation}
g_{\alpha\beta}(r) = e^{-\beta V_{\alpha\beta}(r)} [1 + h_{\alpha\beta}(r) -
c_{\alpha\beta}(r)]
\label{PY-closure}
\end{equation}
is more accurate than the HNC closure. Here we consider the HNC
closure for polymer-polymer and polymer-colloid correlations and the PY closure
for the colloid-colloid correlations.
\item[(iii)]
Rogers-Young (RY) closure
\cite{RY-84,BH-91}.
This closure mixes the HNC and the PY closures, adding free parameters
that are tuned to obtain thermodynamic consistency. It is defined by
\begin{equation}
g_{\alpha\beta}(r) = e^{-\beta V_{\alpha\beta}(r)} \left[
1 + {\exp[(h_{\alpha\beta}(r) - c_{\alpha\beta}(r)) f_{\alpha\beta}(r)] - 1
\over f_{\alpha\beta}(r) } \right],
\end{equation}
where the function $f_{\alpha\beta}(r)$ is given by
\begin{equation}
f_{\alpha\beta} = 1 - e^{-\chi_{\alpha\beta} r}.
\end{equation}
Note that, for $\chi_{\alpha\beta} \to 0$ we recover the PY closure, while
in the opposite limit, $\chi_{\alpha\beta} \to \infty$,
we reobtain the HNC closure.
In most of the discussion we have considered a single optimization parameter,
setting $\chi_{\alpha\beta} = \chi/s_{\alpha\beta}$,
$s_{cc} = R_c$, $s_{pp} = {R}_g$, $s_{pc} = (R_c + {R}_g)/2$. The parameter
$\chi$ has been determined as discussed below.
\item[(iv)]
Reference HNC (RHNC) closure \cite{RA-79,ELLAL-84}. In this approach
one sets $b_{\alpha\beta}(r) = b^{HS}_{\alpha\beta}(r;R_p,R_c)$, where the
latter quantities are the bridge functions of a system of additive hard spheres
of radii $R_p$ and $R_c$ at the same densities of the polymers
and colloids in the original system.
The polymer effective radius $R_p$ is determined by using
the Lado criterion \cite{Lado-82,ELLAL-84}
\begin{equation}
\sum_{\alpha\beta} x_\alpha x_\beta
\int_0^\infty r^2 dr\,
[h_{\alpha\beta}(r) - h_{\alpha\beta}^{HS}(r;R_p,R_c)]
{\partial b^{HS}_{\alpha\beta}(r;R_p,R_c) \over \partial R_p} = 0,
\label{Lado-eq}
\end{equation}
where $x_\alpha = N_\alpha/(N_c + N_p) = \rho_\alpha/(\rho_p + \rho_c)$.
The bridge functions $b^{HS}_{\alpha\beta}(r;R_p,R_c)$ can be computed
as discussed in Refs.~\cite{Lebowitz-64,LHP-65,MCSL-71,VW-72,GH-72,LL-73,
HG-75,ELLAL-84}.
\end{itemize}
Solving simultaneously the OZ and the closure relations, one obtains $h_{\alpha\beta}(r)$
and $c_{\alpha\beta}(r)$. Then, one can use them to compute thermodynamic quantities.
\subsection{Observables} \label{sec2.3}
We will be interested in computing the pressure. One possibility
consists in using the virial expression:
\begin{equation}
\beta P^{\rm (vir)} = \rho \left(1 + \sum_{\alpha\beta} Z_{\alpha\beta}\right),
\end{equation}
where $\beta = 1/k_B T$,
$\rho = \rho_p + \rho_c$, and the quantities $Z_{\alpha\beta}$ are given by
\begin{equation}
Z_{\alpha\beta} = - {2\pi\over 3\rho} \rho_\alpha\rho_\beta
\int_0^\infty r^3 dr\,
{\partial \beta V_{\alpha\beta}\over \partial r} g_{\alpha\beta}(r).
\label{R-virial}
\end{equation}
This expression cannot be applied to hard spheres, since the potential is
discontinuous. In this case we have
\begin{equation}
Z_{cc} = {16\pi R_c^3\over 3\rho} \rho^2_c g_{cc} (2 R_c).
\end{equation}
Eq.~(\ref{R-virial}) is also not convenient in the polymer-colloid case as
$\beta V_{pc}(r)$ diverges as $r\to 0$.
In the HNC case, this problem can be overcome by rewriting
Eq.~(\ref{R-virial}) as
\begin{equation}
Z_{\alpha\beta} = {2\pi \over 3\rho} \rho_\alpha\rho_\beta
\int_0^\infty r^3 dr\, {\partial e^{-\beta V_{\alpha\beta}}\over \partial r}
e^{h_{\alpha\beta}(r) - c_{\alpha\beta}(r)}.
\end{equation}
A similar formula can be analogously obtained in the
case of the RY closure.
Another quantity we shall be interested in is the isothermal compressibility
$\kappa_T$ that can be either computed by using the virial route
\begin{equation}
{\beta \over \kappa_T} =
\left( {\partial \beta P^{\rm (vir)} \over
\partial \rho_p}\right)_{\rho_c} \rho_p +
\left( {\partial \beta P^{\rm (vir)} \over
\partial \rho_c}\right)_{\rho_p} \rho_c
\label{chit-vir}
\end{equation}
or as \cite{BenNaim}
\begin{equation}
{\beta\over \kappa_T} =
\rho - \sum_{\alpha\beta} \rho_\alpha \rho_\beta \hat{c}_{\alpha\beta}(0).
\label{chit-c}
\end{equation}
The two expressions are thermodynamically equivalent. However, when an
approximate closure is used, two different results are obtained, as
a consequence of the thermodynamic inconsistency of the approach.
In the RY case, the parameter $\chi$ is fixed so that the two different
routes provide the same result for $\kappa_T$.
Finally, we shall consider the structure factors
\begin{equation}
S_{\alpha\beta}(k) = \delta_{\alpha\beta} +
\sqrt{\rho_\alpha\rho_\beta} \hat{h}_{\alpha\beta}(k),
\end{equation}
and the concentration structure factor
\begin{equation}
S_c(k) = x_p x_c \left[x_p S_{cc}(k) + x_c S_{pp}(k) -
2 \sqrt{x_p x_c} S_{cp}(k)\right].
\end{equation}
For $k\to 0$, $1/S_c(k)\to \partial^2 \beta g(x_p,P)/\partial x_p^2$, where
$g(x_p,P)$ is
the Gibbs free energy per particle. Hence, its divergence signals the
thermodynamic instability of the homogeneous phase.
\section{Results} \label{sec3}
In order to solve the coupled integral equations,
the correlation functions
are discretized on a regular grid. We usually take a step size
$\Delta r/R_g = 10^{-3}$ and truncate the correlation functions
at $R_{\rm max}/R_g = N \Delta r$, with $N = 32768$.
As we discuss in appendix \ref{AppA}, these choices make truncation and
discretization errors
negligible. We use the standard Picard iterative method, which converges
quite fast, except close to the termination line. We improve convergence
by considering a mixing parameter $\alpha$. If $c^{(n)}_{\rm ini}(r)$ and
$c^{(n)}_{\rm end}(r)$ indicate
the direct correlation functions at the beginning and at
the end of the $n$-th step of the iterative procedure, respectively, we set
$c^{(n+1)}_{\rm ini}(r) = (1 - \alpha) c^{(n)}_{\rm ini}(r) + \alpha
c^{(n)}_{\rm end}(r)$. Far from the termination line, $\alpha$ is not a
relevant parameter. However, close to the termination line,
convergence is only obtained if $\alpha$ is small. In some cases,
we took $\alpha \sim 10^{-2}$.
\subsection{Termination lines} \label{sec3.1}
In order to determine the termination line,
we work as
follows. We fix the colloid volume fraction $\Phi_c$ ($\Phi_c = 4 \pi R_c^3
N_c/3 V$,
where $N_c$ is the number of colloids present in the box of volume $V$)
and solve the equations for a small value of the polymer density.
Typically, if $\Phi_p = 4 \pi R_g^3 N_p/3 V$ ($N_p$ is the number of
polymers present in the box of volume $V$), we start at
$\Phi_p \approx 0.005$
for $\Phi_c\mathrel{\spose{\lower 3pt\hbox{$\mathchar"218$} 0.2$ and at $\Phi_p \approx 0.01$ for smaller
colloid volume fractions. Then, we increase $\Phi_p$ by steps
$\Delta \Phi_p$.
For $q = 1$ we have been able to increase $\Phi_p$ up to 2.5 for all values
of $\Phi_c \le 0.45$: We always find a regular solution of the
integral equations.
This is not surprising,
as, for this value of $q$, Monte Carlo simulations indicate that the
fluid-fluid binodal either does not exist or is located at quite large
values of the polymer volume fraction. In particular, Ref.~\cite{DMPP-15}
found no phase transition up to
$\Phi_p = 2.12$, 1.73, 1.33 for $\Phi_c = 0.1,0.2,0.3$, respectively.
\begin{figure}[t]
\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{cc}
\epsfig{file=IsoPPYq0.8.ps,width=4.8truecm,angle=-90}
\hspace{0truecm} &
\epsfig{file=GsecondPYq0.8.ps,width=4.8truecm,angle=-90}
\hspace{0truecm} \\
\end{tabular}
\end{center}
\caption{Results for $q = 0.8$ and the HNC/PY closure (in this case there is
no termination line). Left: isobars corresponding to
$\beta P R_c^3 = 1$, 2, 3, 4, and 5
in the $\Phi_c$, $\Phi_p$ plane. We also report the Monte Carlo estimates
of the binodal (empty squares, MC). Note that isobars
with $\beta P R_c^3 \ge 3$ go through the two-phase region.
Right: $1/S_c(k=0)$ along the same isobars
reported in the left panel as a function of $x_p = N_p/(N_p + N_c)$.
}
\label{Scq0p8-HNCPY}
\end{figure}
For $q = 0.8$ integral equations do not show any singular behavior
if the HNC/PY closure is used. Also in this case
we have been able to solve the equations for any
$\Phi_p \le 2.5$ and $\Phi_c \le 0.45$. No phase demixing is
observed, as it is evident from the behavior of
$1/S_c(k=0)$ along five different isobars shown in Fig.~\ref{Scq0p8-HNCPY}.
At the critical point $1/S_c(k=0)$ should vanish. Instead, it
increases as the pressure $P$ is increased, with no indication
of a zero for some values of $P$ and $x_p$. Apparently, the HNC/PY closure
fails even in reproducing the qualitative behavior of the system.
\begin{table}[h]
\caption{For each $q$ and $\Phi_c$ (first two columns),
we report the polymer volume fraction $\Phi_p$ at which integral
equations no longer converge to a physical solution
for three different closures:
HNC, HNC/PY, and RY. In the last column we report the polymer volume fraction
$\Phi_p^{\rm bin}$ at which the binodal, as computed by Monte Carlo
simulations \cite{DMPP-15}, occurs. We have also computed the termination line
for the RHNC closure, for $q = 0.5$ and $\Phi_c = 0.3$: $\Phi_p = 0.104$.
}
\label{table:noconv0p5}
\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{cccccc}
\hline\hline
$q$ & $\Phi_c$ & HNC & HNC/PY & RY & $\Phi_p^{\rm bin}$ \\
\hline
0.5
& 0.10 & 0.87 & $\ge 2.5$ & 0.88 & 0.69 \\
& 0.20 & 0.23 & $\ge 2.5$ & 0.34 & 0.53 \\
& 0.30 & 0.090& 0.15 & 0.18 & 0.38 \\
& 0.40 & 0.036& 0.07 & 0.115& 0.255 \\ \hline
0.8
& 0.10 & $\ge 2.5$ & $\ge 2.5$ & $\ge 2$ & \\
& 0.20 & 0.61 & $\ge 2.5$ & $\ge 2$ & 1.0 \\
& 0.30 & 0.175 & $\ge 2.5$ & 0.39 & 0.75 \\
& 0.40 & 0.086 & $\ge 2.5$ & 0.29& $0.5\le \Phi_p \le 0.6$ \\
\hline\hline
\end{tabular}
\end{center}
\end{table}
\begin{figure}[t]
\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{c}
\epsfig{file=Sc_q0.5c0.3p0.0905.ps,width=4.8truecm,angle=-90}
\hspace{0truecm} \\
\end{tabular}
\end{center}
\caption{Estimate of $S_c(k)$ for $\Phi_c = 0.3$ and $\Phi_p = 0.0905$,
on the termination line. Here $q = 0.5$ and we use the HNC closure.
}
\label{fig:Sck-termination}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure}[t]
\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{c}
\epsfig{file=Scorrwondq0.5c0.3.ps,width=4.8truecm,angle=-90}
\hspace{0truecm} \\
\end{tabular}
\end{center}
\caption{Estimate of $S_c(k=0)$ for three different $\Delta \Phi_p$
and the HNC closure.
We start from the values of $c_{\alpha\beta}(r)$ and $h_{\alpha\beta}(r)$
for $\Phi_p = 0.9$ and increase $\Phi_p$ by steps $\Delta \Phi_p$
up to $\Phi_p = 0.0915$, then we decrease $\Phi_p$ with the same schedule
up to $\Phi_p = 0.086$. The termination line occurs for $\Phi_p = 0.0903$.
}
\label{fig:nonconv}
\end{figure}
For $q = 0.8$ a termination line is observed if we use the
HNC or the RY closures, while for $q = 0.5$ a no-convergence domain is observed
also by using the HNC/PY closure. Results for the
termination lines for both values of $q$ are reported in
Table~\ref{table:noconv0p5}.
The termination line is determined as follows. Starting from the
initial value $\Phi_p^{(0)}$, we subsequently solve the equations
for $\Phi_p^{(n)} = \Phi_p^{(0)} + n \Delta \Phi_p$, starting
the iterations for the $n$-th density from the solution at $\Phi_p^{(n-1)}$.
If $\Delta \Phi_p$
is large or the mixing parameter in the Picard iterations is of order 1,
we end up at a density $\Phi_p^{(M)}$ where the iterations no longer
converge. Then, we consider again the solution at $\Phi_p^{(M-1)}$,
but now we significantly decrease $\Delta \Phi_p$ and the mixing parameter
(typically we take a parameter as small as 0.01). If we increase
again $\Phi_p$, we now observe that the Picard iterations always converge.
However, at a very specific value of $\Phi_p$ the stable solution is no
longer physical, as $S_c(k)$ becomes
discontinuous at a finite value of $k$.
We identify the termination line as the smallest polymer density at
which $S_c(k)$ (the same occurs for all structure factors $S_{\alpha\beta}(k)$)
develops a discontinuity. An example is shown
in Fig.~\ref{fig:Sck-termination}, where we
report $S_c(k)$ for $q=0.5$, $\Phi_c = 0.3$, $\Phi_p = 0.0903$, as obtained
by using the HNC closure. It is interesting to observe that while
the position of the termination line is independent of the protocol
used to increment $\Phi_p$, the singular solution depends on
$\Delta \Phi_p$. For instance, in Fig.~\ref{fig:nonconv} we show the
estimates of $S_c(k=0)$ as a function of $\Phi_p$ for three different
values of $\Delta \Phi_p$. Incrementing $\Phi_p$,
at the termination line $\Phi_p = 0.0903$ we always observe a jump
in $S_c(0)$ to a new value. However, such value depends on $\Delta \Phi_p$.
If we further
increase $\Phi_p$ beyond the termination line and then decrease again $\Phi_p$,
the unphysical solution appears to be stable: The structure factor
changes smoothly with $\Phi_p$. Moreover, once $\Phi_p$ is again below
the termination-line value, if we use a small mixing parameter, we always
obtain the unphysical solution.
\begin{figure}[t]
\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{cc}
\epsfig{file=Phase0.5.ps,width=5truecm,angle=-90}
\hspace{0truecm} &
\epsfig{file=Phase0.8.ps,width=5truecm,angle=-90}
\hspace{0truecm} \\
\end{tabular}
\end{center}
\caption{Phase diagram for $q = 0.5$ (left) and $q = 0.8$ (right).
We report the binodals obtained by Monte Carlo simulations (MC),
the corresponding critical point (MC-CP), and
the termination lines for each of the closures.
}
\label{Phase_diag}
\end{figure}
The termination lines for the different closures are reported in
Fig.~\ref{Phase_diag}. In general, we find that the RY closure
performs better than the HNC one, which stops converging at very small
values of $\Phi_p$ in the colloid-liquid phase. In all cases, however,
the termination line is significantly below the correct binodal,
especially in the colloid-liquid phase $\Phi_c \mathrel{\spose{\lower 3pt\hbox{$\mathchar"218$} 0.25$. Clearly,
the convergence to an unphysical solution is not directly related to
singularities in the thermodynamic behavior of the model. Therefore,
the termination line provides a very poor approximation of the phase-separation
line.
Let us finally consider the RHNC closure. Since this approach is quite
complex, we have only analyzed one case: $q = 0.5$ and $\Phi_c = 0.3$.
For $\Phi_p \approx 0$, the effective radius $R_p$ is equal to
$0.837 R_g$. This is a completely reasonable value, indicating that
polymers are effectively equivalent to hard spheres of radius approximately
equal to $R_g$. As $\Phi_p$ increases,
the effective radius $R_p$ decreases quite rapidly: for $\Phi_p = 0.1$
we find $R_p = 0.60 R_g$. Again, this is consistent with intuition,
as we expect the polymer to shrink as $\Phi_p$ increases. Unfortunately,
we are not able to go much beyond $\Phi_p = 0.1$, as the RHNC equations
cease to converge at $\Phi_p = 0.104$. Hence, this approach represents
only a modest improvement with respect to the HNC approach
(the HNC termination line occurs at $\Phi_p = 0.090$).
\begin{figure}[t]
\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{cc}
\epsfig{file=Sccq0.5c0.1.ps,angle=0,width=5truecm,angle=-90} \hspace{0truecm} &
\epsfig{file=Sccq0.5c0.3.ps,angle=0,width=5truecm,angle=-90} \hspace{0truecm} \\
\epsfig{file=Scpq0.5c0.1.ps,angle=0,width=5truecm,angle=-90} \hspace{0truecm} &
\epsfig{file=Scpq0.5c0.3.ps,angle=0,width=5truecm,angle=-90} \hspace{0truecm} \\
\epsfig{file=Sppq0.5c0.1.ps,angle=0,width=5truecm,angle=-90} \hspace{0truecm} &
\epsfig{file=Sppq0.5c0.3.ps,angle=0,width=5truecm,angle=-90} \hspace{0truecm}
\end{tabular}
\end{center}
\caption{Structure factors $S_{\alpha\beta}(k=0)$ for $q= 0.5$ and
$\Phi_c = 0.1$ (left) and $\Phi_c = 0.3$ (right). Lines are the
results obtained by using the HNC, HNC/PY, and RY closures. Symbols are
Monte Carlo data. For $\Phi_c = 0.3$ we also include results
for the RHNC closure and results obtained by using the
zero-polymer-density Monte Carlo bridge functions (MC-B), as
discussed in Sec.~\ref{sec3.4}.
}
\label{Scq0.5}
\end{figure}
\subsection{Structural behavior in the homogeneous phase} \label{sec3.2}
We wish now to compare the integral-equation predictions with the Monte Carlo
ones in the homogeneous phase. We consider the case $q=0.5$, in which
a termination line occurs for all considered closure relations. We
begin by analyzing the
structure factors $S_{\alpha\beta}(k=0)$, which are
directly related to thermodynamics by the compressibility equations
\cite{HansenMcDonald,BenNaim}. In Fig.~\ref{Scq0.5} we report the
corresponding estimates for two values of $\Phi_c$, $\Phi_c = 0.1$ and 0.3,
that lie on opposite sides with respect to the critical point located at
$\Phi_{c,\rm crit} = 0.25$, $\Phi_{p,\rm crit} =0.46$, as
estimated by Monte Carlo simulations \cite{DMPP-15}.
For $\Phi_c = 0.1$ the HNC/PY closure significantly underestimates the
structure factors. Clearly, $|S_{\alpha\beta}(0)|$ increases too slowly
as $\Phi_p$ increases, explaining why convergence is observed at least up
to $\Phi_p = 2.5$, see Table~\ref{table:noconv0p5}. The HNC and RY
estimates increase faster. The latter are more accurate than the HNC
ones for small densities, but they significantly underestimate
$|S_{\alpha\beta}(0)|$ close to the binodal, which is located at
$\Phi_p \approx 0.70$ \cite{DMPP-15}. The fact that the RY results are less
accurate than the HNC ones near the binodal may be surprising, as the RY closure is
a generalization of the HNC closure. It simply indicates that the
requirement of thermodynamic consistency does not necessarily lead to more
accurate results. Note that both HNC and RY integral equations also
converge for some values of $\Phi_p$ in the
metastable region beyond the binodal, see Fig.~\ref{Phase_diag}.
In this domain the
structure factors $S_{\alpha\beta}(0)$ are
quite large [on the binodal, Monte Carlo simulations give
$S_{pp}(0) = 11.5(6)$, $S_{cp}(0) = -6.7(4)$, $S_{cc}(0) = 4.2(2)$].
Therefore, even though we do not observe an exact divergence of
$S_{\alpha\beta}(k=0)$,
for this value of $\Phi_c$ we can take the termination line
as a good estimate of the spinodal.
For $\Phi_c = 0.3$ the behavior is quite different and the termination lines
occur at values of $\Phi_p$ significantly smaller than that of the binodal.
Moreover, integral equations stop converging when the structure
factors $|S_{\alpha\beta}(0)|$
are relatively small, at least if compared with the values they assume
on the binodal at $\Phi_c = 0.1$. For instance, the HNC and HNC/PY
equations both cease to converge when $S_{pp}(0) \approx 3$,
while $S_{pp}(0)\approx 5$ on the RY termination line.
Comparing the integral-equation estimates
with the Monte Carlo results, we see that the RY closure is here the most
accurate, in agreement with previous studies \cite{DLL-02,PP-14}, although
it fails to converge well before the binodal.
As for the RHNC, the estimates of $S_{cc}(0)$ and $S_{cp}(0)$ are consistent
with the RY ones and the Monte Carlo data up to $\Phi_p \approx 0.08$.
On the other hand, the RHNC estimates of $S_{pp}(0)$ increase
too fast for $\Phi_p \mathrel{\spose{\lower 3pt\hbox{$\mathchar"218$} 0.04$, looking similar to the
HNC estimates. Also in this case the termination line occurs for
$S_{pp}(0) \approx 3$.
\begin{figure}[t]
\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{cc}
\epsfig{file=gccq0.5c0.1p0.7.ps,angle=0,width=5truecm,angle=-90}
\hspace{0truecm} &
\epsfig{file=gccq0.5c0.30p0.085.ps,angle=0,width=5truecm,angle=-90}
\hspace{0truecm} \\
\epsfig{file=gcpq0.5c0.1p0.7.ps,angle=0,width=5truecm,angle=-90}
\hspace{0truecm} &
\epsfig{file=gcpq0.5c0.3p0.085.ps,angle=0,width=5truecm,angle=-90}
\hspace{0truecm} \\
\epsfig{file=gppq0.5c0.1p0.7.ps,angle=0,width=5truecm,angle=-90}
\hspace{0truecm} &
\epsfig{file=gppq0.5c0.3p0.085.ps,angle=0,width=5truecm,angle=-90}
\hspace{0truecm}
\end{tabular}
\end{center}
\caption{Pair correlation functions $g_{\alpha\beta}(r)$ as a function
of $b = r/R_g$ for $q= 0.5$ at
two different state points:
$\Phi_c = 0.1$, $\Phi_p = 0.70$ (left) and
$\Phi_c = 0.3$, $\Phi_p = 0.085$ (right).
Lines are the results obtained by using the HNC, HNC/PY, RY, RHNC
closures. Symbols are
Monte Carlo data.
}
\label{gq0.5}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure}[t]
\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{c}
\epsfig{file=RYgccq0.5c0.3p0.15.ps,angle=0,width=5truecm,angle=-90}
\hspace{0truecm} \\
\epsfig{file=RYgcpq0.5c0.3p0.15.ps,angle=0,width=5truecm,angle=-90}
\hspace{0truecm} \\
\epsfig{file=RYgppq0.5c0.3p0.15.ps,angle=0,width=5truecm,angle=-90}
\hspace{0truecm}
\end{tabular}
\end{center}
\caption{Pair correlation functions $g_{\alpha\beta}(r)$ as a function
of $b = r/R_g$ for $q= 0.5$ at
$\Phi_c = 0.3$, $\Phi_p = 0.15$.
Lines are the results obtained by using the RY
closure. Symbols are Monte Carlo data.
}
\label{gq0.5-2}
\end{figure}
As a second test let us compare the pair distribution functions.
For $\Phi_c = 0.1$ and $\Phi_p = 0.7$, i.e. on the binodal,
see Fig.~\ref{gq0.5},
all closures reasonably reproduce the polymer-polymer distribution
function. Deviations are instead observed for the polymer-colloid
and especially for the colloid-colloid distribution function.
The largest deviations are observed for the HNC/PY closure. For instance,
the colloid-colloid correlation is significantly
underestimated at contact. While an extrapolation of the Monte Carlo
data predicts $g_{cc}(2 R_c) \approx 13$-14, we estimate
$g_{cc}(2 R_c) \approx 4$ by using the HNC/PY closure.
The RY closure performs better, although it is also unable to
predict the correct value of $g_{cc}(r)$ at contact and slightly overestimates
$g_{cp}(r)$ at the first peak. As for the structure factors, the HNC closure is
the most accurate one for this value of $\Phi_c$, as the HNC curves fall on
top of the Monte Carlo data.
At $\Phi_c = 0.3$ the behavior is quite different, see Fig.~\ref{gq0.5}.
For $\Phi_p = 0.085$,
close to the HNC termination line, HNC results are not accurate, especially
for $g_{pp}(r)$, which is significantly overestimated for $r \mathrel{\spose{\lower 3pt\hbox{$\mathchar"218$} 2 R_g$.
The value of $g_{cc}(r)$ at contact is also significantly overestimated.
The HNC/PY closure gives results that are only marginally better than the HNC
ones, while the RY estimates are in full agreement with the Monte
Carlo data. The RHNC estimates of $g_{cc}(r)$ and $g_{cp}(r)$ are
in agreement with the data, but this is not the case for $g_{pp}(r)$, which
is overestimated for $1\mathrel{\spose{\lower 3pt\hbox{$\mathchar"218$} r/R_g \mathrel{\spose{\lower 3pt\hbox{$\mathchar"218$} 2$, the region in which
the correlation function shows the first peak.
At $\Phi_p = 0.15$ we only have RY data, as integral equations no longer
converge for the other closures. The results are reported in
Fig.~\ref{gq0.5-2}. Pair correlations $g_{cc}(r)$ and $g_{cp}(r)$
are well reproduced, while relatively small deviations are observed
for $g_{pp}(r)$. Apparently, RY estimates are relatively accurate
even close to the corresponding termination line, located at
$\Phi_p = 0.18$.
\subsection{Bridge functions at zero polymer density} \label{sec3.3}
\begin{figure}[t]
\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{cc}
\epsfig{file=bcpq1c0.1.ps,angle=0,width=4.8truecm,angle=-90}
\hspace{0truecm} &
\epsfig{file=bppq1c0.1.ps,angle=0,width=4.8truecm,angle=-90} \\
\epsfig{file=bcpq1c0.3.ps,angle=0,width=4.8truecm,angle=-90}
\hspace{0truecm} &
\epsfig{file=bppq1c0.3.ps,angle=0,width=4.8truecm,angle=-90} \\
\end{tabular}
\end{center}
\caption{Bridge functions for $q=1$ as a function of $b = r/R_g$:
on the left we report
$b_{cp}(r)$, on the right $b_{pp}(r)$. Top: $\Phi_c = 0.1$;
bottom: $\Phi_c = 0.3$.
We report the Monte Carlo estimates (MC)
as well as those obtained by using the different closures.
RY-2 labels the results obtained by using the two-parameter
RY closure discussed in the text.
}
\label{bridgeq1}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure}[t]
\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{cc}
\epsfig{file=bcpq0.5c0.1.ps,angle=0,width=4.8truecm,angle=-90}
\hspace{0truecm} &
\epsfig{file=bppq0.5c0.1.ps,angle=0,width=4.8truecm,angle=-90} \\
\epsfig{file=bcpq0.5c0.3.ps,angle=0,width=4.8truecm,angle=-90}
\hspace{0truecm} &
\epsfig{file=bppq0.5c0.3.ps,angle=0,width=4.8truecm,angle=-90} \\
\end{tabular}
\end{center}
\caption{Bridge function for $q=0.5$ as a function of $b = r/R_g$:
on the left we report
$b_{cp}(r)$, on the right $b_{pp}(r)$. Top: $\Phi_c = 0.1$;
bottom: $\Phi_c = 0.3$.
We report the Monte Carlo estimates (MC)
as well as those obtained by using the different closures.
RY-2 labels the results obtained by using the two-parameter
RY closure discussed in the text.
}
\label{bridgeq0.5}
\end{figure}
The failure of integral-equation methods to reproduce the
thermodynamics for $\Phi_c \mathrel{\spose{\lower 3pt\hbox{$\mathchar"218$} 0.2$ and to provide a
reasonably accurate estimate of the boundary of the two-phase region
clearly indicates that none of the closures we used is appropriate for the
problem at hand. To understand better the origin of the discrepancies, we
now compare the bridge functions used in the integral-equation approach
with the exact estimates obtained numerically, by using the MC results
for the pair correlation functions. For this purpose we should compute
$g_{\alpha\beta}(r)$ accurately on large boxes. It turns out that
this is feasible only for $\Phi_p\to 0$, the case we will study below.
The input numerical quantities are $g_{cc}(r)$ (we use the accurate
expressions that can be obtained as
discussed in Refs.~\cite{MCSL-71,ELLAL-84}),
$g_{cp}(r)$, and $g_{pp}(r)$. To determine
the last two quantities, we perform simulations for different
values of $\Phi_p$ on systems of linear size $L/R_g = 32$, 24 for
$q = 0.5$ and 1, and perform
an extrapolation to $\Phi_p \to 0$. Then, we determine the direct
correlation functions by inverting the OZ relations, which,
for $\Phi_p\to 0$, simplify to
\begin{eqnarray}
\hat{c}_{cc}(k) &=& {\hat{h}_{cc}(k)\over 1 + \rho_c \hat{h}_{cc}(k)} ,
\nonumber \\
\hat{c}_{cp}(k) &=& \hat{h}_{cp}(k) - \rho_c \hat{c}_{cc}(k) \hat{h}_{cp}(k),
\nonumber \\
\hat{c}_{pp}(k) &=& \hat{h}_{pp}(k) - \rho_c \hat{c}_{cp}(k) \hat{h}_{cp}(k).
\label{OZ-Phip0}
\end{eqnarray}
Finally, we define
\begin{equation}
b_{\alpha\beta}(r) = \ln\left[ g_{\alpha\beta}(r) e^{\beta V_{\alpha\beta}(r)}
\right] + c_{\alpha\beta}(r) - h_{\alpha\beta}(r).
\label{bridge}
\end{equation}
We will focus on the polymer-polymer and colloid-polymer functions,
as $b_{cc}(r)$ depends only on the hard-sphere fluid, a case that has
already been extensively discussed in the literature. Note that
$\beta V_{cp}(r)$ is large for $r \mathrel{\spose{\lower 3pt\hbox{$\mathchar"218$} R_c$, so that $g_{\alpha\beta}(r)$
is not determined accurately for these distances. Hence, we are not able
to obtain reliable estimates of $b_{cp}(r)$ for $r \mathrel{\spose{\lower 3pt\hbox{$\mathchar"218$} R_c$.
For the HNC or the HNC/PY closure, we have $b_{cp}(r) = b_{pp}(r) = 0$.
In all other cases, the bridge functions are obtained from
Eq.~(\ref{bridge}), using the correlation functions obtained by means of
the different closures. For the values of $r$ for which $V_{cp}(r)$ is
large, it is convenient to express $g_{cp}(r) e^{\beta V_{cp}(r)}$
in terms of $h_{cp}(r)-c_{cp}(r)$ using the closure relation.
This trick allows us to compute the bridge functions $b_{cp}(r)$
inside the core region $r \mathrel{\spose{\lower 3pt\hbox{$\mathchar"218$} R_c$, although here they cannot be
compared with the Monte Carlo results.
In this section we do not consider the HNC/PY, as
it has the same bridge functions of the HNC closure. We will instead
discuss the full PY closure, in which Eq.~(\ref{PY-closure}) is used for all
correlations.
The bridge functions for $\Phi_c = 0.1$ and $0.3$ are reported in
Figs.~\ref{bridgeq1} and \ref{bridgeq0.5} for $q=1$ and 0.5, respectively.
For $\Phi_c = 0.1$ the bridge functions are tiny, explaining why the HNC
closure works reasonably well.
The PY and RY closures are essentially equivalent.
Small deviations are
evident for $q = 1$ and $r \mathrel{\spose{\lower 3pt\hbox{$\mathchar"218$} 2 R_g$ --- but in this range data
become increasingly less accurate --- while for $q= 0.5$ no deviations
are observed in the region in which data appear to be reliable.
As $\Phi_c$
increases, the bridge functions become increasingly negative for small values
of $r$. For $q = 1$ and $\Phi_c = 0.3$, none of the closures appear to be
accurate, although the RY closure is marginally better, and large
deviations are observed for $r \mathrel{\spose{\lower 3pt\hbox{$\mathchar"218$} 2 R_g$. For $q = 0.5$ the RY
closure reproduces well $b_{cp}(r)$ up to $r \approx 2 R_g$---the region
outside the colloid core. On the other hand, deviations are clearly
observed for $b_{pp}(r)$ when $r \mathrel{\spose{\lower 3pt\hbox{$\mathchar"218$} R_g$. The PY closure is clearly
worse, as it underestimates both bridge functions for
$r \mathrel{\spose{\lower 3pt\hbox{$\mathchar"218$} 2 R_g$-$3 R_g$.
The RY optimization at $\Phi_p = 0$ uses only the colloid-colloid correlations.
Indeed, in this limit the consistency condition is
\begin{eqnarray}
&& \left({\partial \beta P^{({\rm vir})} \over \partial \rho_c}
\right)_{\rho_p = 0} = 1 - \rho_c \hat{c}_{cc}(0).
\label{RY-consistency-1}
\end{eqnarray}
Therefore,
one might think that the relatively poor agreement for the polymer-polymer
correlations for small values of $r$
is related to the fact that the procedure does not take into
account polymer properties. We have thus considered a two-parameter
optimization. We set $\chi_{pp}=\chi_1/R_g$ and $\chi_{cc}=\chi_2/R_c$
as free parameters,
while $\chi_{pc}$ is, somewhat arbitrarily, set equal to
$(\chi_1 + \chi_2)/(R_g + R_c)$.
As consistency conditions, we consider Eq.~(\ref{RY-consistency-1})
and \cite{BenNaim}
\begin{eqnarray}
&& \left({\partial \beta P^{({\rm vir})} \over \partial \rho_p}
\right)_{\rho_c,\rho_p = 0} = 1 - \rho_c \hat{c}_{cp}(0),
\end{eqnarray}
which involves polymer-colloid correlations.
In Figs.~\ref{bridgeq1} and \ref{bridgeq0.5},
we also report the bridge functions for this case (they are labelled RY-2).
For $q = 1$ we observe a significant improvement with respect to the
one-parameter RY case, although significant differences with Monte Carlo data
are still present for $r/R_g\mathrel{\spose{\lower 3pt\hbox{$\mathchar"218$} 1$.
For $q = 0.5$ instead,
the two different RY closures yield equivalent estimates.
As a final case, we consider the RHNC closure, which relies on the
assumption that the bridge functions can be accurately parametrized by those
of a binary additive hard-sphere mixture. To verify if this is the case,
we consider $q = 0.5$ and $\Phi_c = 0.3$, and
compute
\begin{equation}
\Delta(R_p) = \int \left| b_{pp}^{MC}(r) - b_{pp}^{HS}(r,R_p) \right| \, r^2 dr,
\end{equation}
for different values of the effective polymer radius $R_p$.
The optimal value (minimal $\Delta$) is obtained for $R_p = 0.842 {R}_g$.
We can compare this result with that obtained by using the
Lado criterion \cite{Lado-82,ELLAL-84}.
For $\Phi_p = 0$, Eq.~(\ref{Lado-eq}) is satisfied as we use
the very accurate hard-sphere correlation function of Ref.~\cite{GH-72}.
To determine $R_p$ one needs to consider the linear term in the polymer density,
i.e., the equation
\begin{equation}
\int r^2 [h_{cp}(r) - h_{cp}^{HS}(r;R_p,R_c)]
{\partial b_{cp}^{HS}(r;R_p,R_c)\over \partial R_p} = 0.
\end{equation}
Alternatively, one can
determine $R_p$ for several small values of $\Phi_p$, performing at the
end an extrapolation to $\Phi_p\to 0$.
The first method gives $R_p = 0.837 {R}_g$, while the second one
gives $R_p = 0.828 R_g$. Both results are
very close to the
estimate $R_p = 0.842 {R}_g$ obtained by a direct matching of the bridge
functions.
This confirms that the Lado criterion provides the bridge functions
that are the best approximations of the exact ones.
The resulting bridge
functions are reported in
Fig.~\ref{bridgeq0.5}. The RHNC estimate of $b_{cp}(r)$ is in
agreement with the Monte Carlo function for $r \mathrel{\spose{\lower 3pt\hbox{$\mathchar"218$} 2 R_g$.
As for $b_{pp}(r)$,
the RHNC estimate agrees with the Monte Carlo one for
$r \mathrel{\spose{\lower 3pt\hbox{$\mathchar"218$} R_g$. At smaller distances, instead, the RHNC bridge function
underestimates the correct one and appears to
provide a worse approximation than the RY closure.
This analysis for $\Phi_p = 0$ further confirms the results obtained in
Sec.~\ref{sec3.2}. For $\Phi_c = 0.1$, the bridge functions are
quantitatively small, confirming the accuracy of the HNC approximation.
On the other hand, for $\Phi_c = 0.3$,
the RY closure is the one that provides the best
approximation, while the HNC closure is the less accurate one as
it cannot reproduce the small-distance behavior of the bridge functions.
Note that, while $b_{cp}(r)$ is correctly reproduced in the relevant region
$r \mathrel{\spose{\lower 3pt\hbox{$\mathchar"218$} R_c$, the polymer-polymer bridge function is always poorly
reproduced for $ r \mathrel{\spose{\lower 3pt\hbox{$\mathchar"218$} R_g$. This discrepancy gives
rise to similar discrepancies in the correlation functions, as
discussed in Sec.~\ref{sec3.2}.
\subsection{Integral equations with Monte Carlo bridge functions}
\label{sec3.4}
\begin{figure}[t]
\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{cc}
\epsfig{file=RYbcpq0.5c0.3.ps,angle=0,width=4.8truecm,angle=-90}
\hspace{0truecm} &
\epsfig{file=RYbppq0.5c0.3.ps,angle=0,width=4.8truecm,angle=-90} \\
\end{tabular}
\end{center}
\caption{Bridge functions for $\Phi_c = 0.3$ and $q = 0.5$ as
a function of $b = r/R_g$.
We report the zero-density function obtained by Monte Carlo simulations (MC),
and the RY functions for different values of the polymer volume fraction
$\Phi_p$.
}
\label{bridgeRY-Phip}
\end{figure}
As a final test we decided to determine the solutions of the
integral equations by using the zero-density Monte Carlo bridge
functions computed in Sec.~\ref{sec3.3}. In other words, we
consider the closure relation (\ref{def-bridge}), setting
for all values of $\Phi_p$,
$b_{pp}(r;\Phi_c,\Phi_p) = b_{pp}^{MC}(r;\Phi_c,\Phi_p=0)$,
$b_{cp}(r;\Phi_c,\Phi_p) = b_{cp}^{MC}(r;\Phi_c,\Phi_p=0)$,
and
$b_{cc}(r;\Phi_c,\Phi_p) = b_{cc}^{HS}(r;\Phi_c)$,
where the last quantity is the bridge function of a pure
hard-sphere system \cite{HG-75}. This approximation is exact for
$\Phi_p = 0$ and one may wonder whether it provides a reasonable
approximation also for $\Phi_p > 0$. We have tested the approach for $q=0.5$
and $\Phi_c = 0.3$. The results for the structure factors,
reported in Fig.~\ref{Scq0.5} (they are labelled MC-B), show that this
approach is only marginally better than that based on the HNC closure.
Also the termination point, $\Phi_p = 0.11$, is only slighly above the
HNC one, $\Phi_p = 0.090$.
To clarify the origin of the discrepancies,
we have determined the RY bridge functions for several values of $\Phi_p$.
As the RY estimates reasonably agree with the Monte Carlo data up to the
termination line, we take them as estimates of the exact
density-dependent $b_{\alpha\beta}(r;\Phi_c,\Phi_p)$. As one can see from
the results shown in Fig.~\ref{bridgeRY-Phip}, the density dependence
of the bridge functions is not large (for $b_{cp}(r)$ the relevant
region is $b = r/R_g\mathrel{\spose{\lower 3pt\hbox{$\mathchar"218$} 2$). Yet, this relatively small difference
is the cause of the different results obtained. In practice, this simple
exercise shows that results are extremely sensitive to the specific form
of the bridge functions in the colloid-liquid phase $\Phi_c \mathrel{\spose{\lower 3pt\hbox{$\mathchar"218$} 0.25$.
Hence, accurate results can only be obtained by using accurate bridge
functions, that none of the methods we investigated is able to provide.
\section{Conclusions} \label{sec4}
In the last years there has been a widespread interest in soft-matter
systems characterized by the presence of macromolecules of mesoscopic
size. In many situations, if one is only interested in the thermodynamic
behavior or in structural properties on scales much larger than
atomic distances, one can use coarse-grained (CG) models in which each
macromolecule is represented by a single effective particle
\cite{Likos-01,HL-02,DMPP-15}. At variance with simple fluids for
which potentials always have a hard core, in CG models
potentials may be soft, allowing different effective molecules to overlap
with a little energy penalty. Monocomponent CG models
have been extensively studied \cite{Likos-01,HL-02} by a variety of techniques.
Among them, integral-equation methods have been proved to be very
accurate. In particular, because of the soft nature of the interactions,
the HNC and RY closures work quite well \cite{LBHM-00,WLL-98}. It is then
natural to investigate whether integral equations can be successfully
applied to the study of the phase diagram and thermodynamics of more
complex systems, for instance to mixtures of
macromolecules and colloids, characterized by the simultaneous presence
of soft and hard-core potentials.
In this paper, we consider a particular CG model, appropriate
to describe long linear polymers interacting with hard-sphere colloids under
good-solvent conditions, a well-studied paradigmatic model whose
phase behavior has been extensively studied, see, e.g.,
Refs.~\cite{LT-11,DPP-14-GFVT}. However, the conclusions should have general
validity, applying to generic systems with soft and hard-core potentials.
The phase diagram of the CG model has been
discussed recently in Ref.~\cite{DMPP-15}. The binodal curves and the critical
points were determined for $q = 0.5$ and $q=0.8$, while, somewhat surprisingly,
no sign of phase separation was found for $q=1$ up to relatively large polymer
densities. Here, we have compared the Monte Carlo results with predictions
obtained by using integral-equation methods and a variety of different
closures: HNC, HNC/PY, RY, and RHNC.
For small values of $\Phi_c$ we find that HNC is quite succesfull in
predicting the correct thermodynamics and structure. On the other hand,
for $\Phi_c = 0.3$ (note that the critical point of the fluid-fluid transition
is located at $\Phi_{c,\rm crit} = 0.25$ for both $q=0.5$ and 0.8)
integral equations fail to converge well below the binodal line
determined by Monte Carlo simulations. Below the termination line
the RY closure is the one that fares
best, reasonably reproducing the zero-momentum structure factors and the
pair correlation functions. Nonetheless, RY integral equations stop
converging at $\Phi_p = 0.18$, 0.39 for $\Phi_c = 0.3$ and $q=0.5$, 0.8,
respectively, while the binodal
is located at significantly larger polymer
densities, at $\Phi_p = 0.38$, 0.75 for the same values of $q$.
The failure of integral equations to provide accurate estimates of the
phase diagram is probably related to the strong nonadditivity of the
model. Indeed, similarly large differences are observed in Ref.~\cite{PP-14}
for systems of nonadditive hard-sphere mixtures.
If the system is asymmetric,
i.e., for $y \mathrel{\spose{\lower 3pt\hbox{$\mathchar"218$} 0.6$
($y$ is the ratio of the diameters of the two spheres, a
quantity which is the analog of $q$), integral equations (and also density
functional theory) are unable to provide quantitatively reliable results for
the phase diagram. Moreover, discrepancies increase with the amount of
asymmetry considered.
\bigskip
G.D. acknowledges support from the Italian Ministry of Education
Grant PRIN 2010HXAW77. Computations were performed at the Pisa INFN
Computer Center and at CINECA (ISCRA PHCOPY HP10CFFG8Q project).
|
\section{Introduction}
The Lie group $G$ under consideration is compact and connected; the
coefficient for the cohomologies is either the ring $\mathbb{Z}$ of
integers, or one of the finite fields $\mathbb{F}_{p}$, unless otherwise
stated.
For a maximal torus $T$ on $G$ the homogeneous space $G/T$ is canonically a
projective variety, called \textsl{the complete flag manifold} of the Lie
group $G$. Based on a Schubert presentation on the integral cohomology ring
of $G/T$ \cite[Theorem 1.2]{DZ1} we have presented in \cite{DZ2} a unified
construction for the cohomologies of all $1$--connected Lie groups. In this
paper we extend this construction to the compact Lie groups. As applications
of our general approach the integral cohomologies of the adjoint Lie groups
PSU(n),PSp(n),PE_{6},PE_{7}$ are determined, see Theorem 4.7, Theorem 4.12,
as well as the historical remarks in Section 4.5.
The problem of computing the cohomologies of Lie groups was raised by Cartan
in 1929. It is a focus of algebraic topology for the fundamental roles of
Lie groups playing in geometry and topology, see \cite[Chapter VI]{D}, \cit
{K,MT}. On the other hand, the classical Schubert calculus amounts to the
determination of the cohomology rings of the flag manifolds $G/T$ \cite[p.33
]{W}. The present work, together with the companion ones \cite{DZ2,DZ3},
completes our project to determine the integral cohomologies of all compact
Lie groups $G$, as well as the structure of the $\func{mod}p$ cohomology
H^{\ast }(G;\mathbb{F}_{p})$ as a module over the Steenrod algebra $\mathcal
A}_{p}$, in the context of Schubert calculus.
We begin with a general procedure that reduces the construction and
computation with the cohomology of a compact Lie group to that of the $1
--connected ones. It is well known that all the $1$\textsl{--connected}
\textsl{simple Lie groups} $G$, together with their centers $\mathcal{Z}(G)
, are classified by the types $\Phi _{G}$\ of their root systems showing in
the following table, where $e\in G$ is the group unit:
\begin{center}
\textbf{Table 1.1.} The types and centers of the $1$--connected simple Lie
groups
{\footnotesize
\begin{tabular}{l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l|l}
\hline\hline
${\small G}$ & ${\small SU(n)}$ & ${\small Sp(n)}$ & ${\small Spin(2n+1)}$ &
${\small Spin(2n)}$ & ${\small G}_{2}$ & ${\small F}_{4}$ & ${\small E}_{6}$
& ${\small E}_{7}$ & ${\small E}_{8}$ \\ \hline
${\small \Phi }_{{\small G}}$ & $A_{n-1}$ & $B_{n}$ & $C_{n}$ & $D_{n}$ &
{\small G}_{2}$ & ${\small F}_{4}$ & ${\small E}_{6}$ & ${\small E}_{7}$ &
{\small E}_{8}$ \\ \hline
$\mathcal{Z}{\small (G)}$ & $\mathbb{Z}_{n}$ & $\mathbb{Z}_{2}$ & $\mathbb{Z
_{2}$ &
\begin{tabular}{l}
$\mathbb{Z}_{4}${\small ,\ }${\small n=2k+1}$ \\
$\mathbb{Z}_{2}{\small \oplus }\mathbb{Z}_{2}${\small , }${\small n=2k}
\end{tabular}
& ${\small \{e\}}$ & ${\small \{e\}}$ & $\mathbb{Z}_{3}$ & $\mathbb{Z}_{2}$
& ${\small \{e\}}$ \\ \hline
\end{tabular}
}.
\end{center}
\noindent In general, let $G$ be a compact Lie group with $\mathcal{Z
_{0}(G) $ the identity component of the center of $G$, and with $G^{\prime }$
the commutator subgroup of $G$. Then the intersection $F=G^{\prime }\cap
\mathcal{Z}_{0}(G)$ is always a finite abelian group. The Cartan's
classification on compact Lie groups states that (\cite[Theorem 5.22]{S})
\bigskip
\noindent \textbf{Theorem 1.1.} \textsl{The isomorphism type of a compact
Lie group }$G$\textsl{\ is}
\begin{enumerate}
\item[(1.1)] $G=\left[ G^{\prime }\times \mathcal{Z}_{0}(G)\right] /F$,
\end{enumerate}
\noindent \textsl{where }$F$\textsl{\ is embedded in} \textsl{the numerator
group} $G^{\prime }\times \mathcal{Z}_{0}(G)$ \textsl{as} $\{(g,g^{-1})\mid
g\in F\}$.
\textsl{Moreover, the commutator subgroup }$G^{\prime }$\textsl{\ admits\ a
canonical presentation as}
\begin{enumerate}
\item[(1.2)] $G^{\prime }=\left[ G_{1}\times \cdots \times G_{k}\right] /K
\textsl{,}
\end{enumerate}
\noindent \textsl{where each }$G_{t}$\textsl{, }$1\leq t$\textsl{\ }$\leq k
\textsl{, is one of the }$1$\textsl{--connected simple Lie groups listed in
Table 1.1, and where }$K$\textsl{\ is a subgroup of} \textsl{the finite grou
} $\mathcal{Z}(G_{1})\times \cdots \times \mathcal{Z}(G_{k})$.$\square $
\bigskip
In views of (1.1) and (1.2) a Lie group $G$ is called \textsl{semi--simple}
if $\mathcal{Z}_{0}(G)=\{e\}$; \textsl{simple} if $\mathcal{Z}_{0}(G)=\{e\}$
and $k=1$. Since the commutator subgroup $G^{\prime }$ is always
semi--simple we shall call it \textsl{the semi--simple part} of $G$. Based
on Theorem 1.1 we give a diffeomorphism classification of compact Lie groups
in the following result. Let $T^{r}$ be the $r$\textsl{--}dimensional torus
group.
\bigskip
\noindent \textbf{Theorem 1.2.} \textsl{The diffeomorphism type of a compact
Lie group }$G$\textsl{\ with semi--simple part }$G^{\prime }$ \textsl{is}
\begin{enumerate}
\item[(1.3)] $G\cong $\textsl{\ }$G^{\prime }\times T^{r}$\textsl{,} $r=\dim
\mathcal{Z}_{0}(G)$.
\end{enumerate}
\noindent \textbf{Proof. }Since $G^{\prime }$ is normal in $G$ the quotient
space $G/G^{\prime }=\mathcal{Z}_{0}(G)/F$ has the structure of an abelian
group isomorphic to the $r$\textsl{--}dimensional torus group\textsl{\ }
T^{r}$, $r=\dim \mathcal{Z}_{0}(G)$, and the quotient map $h:G\rightarrow
G/G^{\prime }=T^{r}$ is both a group homomorphism and a submersion with
fiber $G^{\prime }$.
Take a maximal torus $T^{\prime }$ on $G^{\prime }$. By (1.1) a maximal
torus on $G$ is $T=\left[ T^{\prime }\times \mathcal{Z}_{0}(G)\right] /F$.
Since the restriction $h\mid T:T\rightarrow T^{r}$ of $h$ on $T$ is a fiber
bundle in torus groups there is a monomorphism $\sigma :T^{r}\rightarrow T$
so that the composition $\left( h\mid T\right) \circ \sigma $ is the
identity on $T^{r}$. Since $\sigma $ can be viewed as a section of $h$, one
obtains the diffeomorphism (1.3) from the fact that the fiber of $h$ is a
group.$\square $
\bigskip
The unitary group $U(n)$ of order $n$ may serve as the first example
illustrating the subtle difference between the isomorphism and
diffeomorphism types of a Lie group. As a group it is isomorphic to $\left[
SU(n)\times S^{1}\right] /\mathbb{Z}_{n}$, while as a smooth manifold it is
diffeomorphic to the product space $SU(n)\times S^{1}$.
Let $G$ be a semi--simple Lie group whose center $\mathcal{Z}(G)$ contains
the cyclic group $\mathbb{Z}_{q}$ of order $q$. Consider the cyclic covering
$c:G\rightarrow G/\mathbb{Z}_{q}$ of Lie groups. Since the classifying space
$B\mathbb{Z}_{q}$ of the group $\mathbb{Z}_{q}$ is the Elienberg--MaClane
space $K(\mathbb{Z}_{q},1)$ the classifying map $f_{c}:$ $G/\mathbb{Z
_{q}\rightarrow B\mathbb{Z}_{q}$ of $c$ defines a cohomology class $\iota
\in H^{1}(G/\mathbb{Z}_{q};\mathbb{F}_{q})$, called \textsl{the
characteristic class of the covering}.
On the other hand let $\mathbb{Z}_{q}$ act on the circle group $S^{1}$ as
the anti--clockwise rotation through the angle $2\pi /q$. Then the obvious
group homomorphism
\begin{enumerate}
\item[(1.4)] $C:\left[ G\times S^{1}\right] /\mathbb{Z}_{q}\rightarrow G
\mathbb{Z}_{q}$
\end{enumerate}
\noindent is an oriented cycle bundle on the quotient group $G/\mathbb{Z
_{q} $ with Euler class $\omega =\beta _{q}(\iota )\in H^{2}(G/\mathbb{Z
_{q})$, where $\beta _{q}$ is the Bockstein homomorphism. The Gysin sequence
of the circle bundle $C$ then yields the exact sequence \cite[P.143]{MS}
\begin{enumerate}
\item[(1.5)] $\cdots \rightarrow H^{r}(G/\mathbb{Z}_{q})\overset{C^{\ast }}
\rightarrow }H^{r}(G\times S^{1})\overset{\theta }{\rightarrow }H^{r-1}(G
\mathbb{Z}_{q})\overset{\omega }{\rightarrow }H^{r+1}(G/\mathbb{Z}_{q}
\overset{C^{\ast }}{\rightarrow }\cdots $
\end{enumerate}
\noindent where $\omega $\ denotes the homomorphism of taking product with
the class $\omega $, and where the space $\left[ G\times S^{1}\right]
\mathbb{Z}_{q}$ has been replaced by its diffeomorphism type $G\times S^{1}$
by Theorem 1.2. Let $p:G\times S^{1}\rightarrow S^{1}$\ be the projection
onto the second factor, and $\varepsilon \in H^{1}(S^{1})$ the canonical
orientation on $S^{1}$. In what follows we set
\begin{enumerate}
\item[(1.6)] $\xi _{1}:=p^{\ast }(\varepsilon )\in H^{1}(G\times S^{1})$.
\end{enumerate}
Let $J(\omega )$ and $\left\langle \omega \right\rangle $ be respectively
the subring and the ideal of $H^{\ast }(G/\mathbb{Z}_{q})$ generated by
\omega $. Write $H^{\ast }(G/\mathbb{Z}_{q})_{\left\langle \omega
\right\rangle }$ for the quotient ring $H^{\ast }(G/\mathbb{Z
_{q})/\left\langle \omega \right\rangle $ with quotient map $g$. Then, in
addition to the short exact sequence of rings
\begin{enumerate}
\item[(1.7)] $0\rightarrow \left\langle \omega \right\rangle \rightarrow
H^{\ast }(G/\mathbb{Z}_{q})\overset{g}{\rightarrow }H^{\ast }(G/\mathbb{Z
_{q})_{\left\langle \omega \right\rangle }\rightarrow 0$,
\end{enumerate}
\noindent the cohomology $H^{\ast }(G/\mathbb{Z}_{q})$ can be regarded as a
module over its subring $J(\omega )$.
\bigskip
\noindent \textbf{Theorem\textbf{\ }1.3.} \textsl{The induced map }$C^{\ast
} $ \textsl{fits into} \textsl{the exact sequence}
\begin{enumerate}
\item[(1.8)] $0\rightarrow H^{\ast }(G/\mathbb{Z}_{q})_{\left\langle \omega
\right\rangle }\overset{C^{\ast }}{\rightarrow }H^{\ast }(G\times S^{1}
\overset{\theta }{\rightarrow }H^{\ast }(G/\mathbb{Z}_{q})\overset{\omega }
\rightarrow }\left\langle \omega \right\rangle \rightarrow 0$
\end{enumerate}
\noindent \textsl{in which the homomorphism }$\theta $\textsl{\ has the
following} \textsl{properties}
\begin{quote}
\textsl{i)} $\theta (\xi _{1})=q\in H^{0}(G/\mathbb{Z}_{q})$\textsl{;}
\textsl{ii)} $\theta (x\cup C^{\ast }(y))=\theta (x)\cup y$ \textsl{for}
x\in H^{\ast }(G\times S^{1})$ \textsl{and} $y\in H^{\ast }(G/\mathbb{Z
_{q}) $\textsl{.}
\end{quote}
\textsl{Moreover, if the map }$g$ \textsl{in (1.7) admits a split
homomorphism} $j:H^{\ast }(G/\mathbb{Z}_{q})_{\left\langle \omega
\right\rangle }$ $\rightarrow $ $H^{\ast }(G/\mathbb{Z}_{q})$\textsl{, then
the map}
\begin{quote}
$h:J(\omega )\otimes H^{\ast }(G/\mathbb{Z}_{q})_{\left\langle \omega
\right\rangle }\rightarrow H^{\ast }(G/\mathbb{Z}_{q})$
\end{quote}
\noindent \textsl{by} $h(\omega ^{r}\otimes x)=\omega ^{r}\cup j(x)$ \textsl
induces an isomorphism of }$J(\omega )$\textsl{--modules}
\begin{enumerate}
\item[(1.9)] $H^{\ast }(G/\mathbb{Z}_{q})\cong \frac{J(\omega )\otimes
H^{\ast }(G/\mathbb{Z}_{q})_{\left\langle \omega \right\rangle }}
\left\langle \omega \cdot \func{Im}\theta \right\rangle }$\textsl{.}
\end{enumerate}
\noindent \textbf{Proof.} The sequence (1.8) is easily seen to be a compact
form of (1.5), while the properties i) and ii) about the map $\theta $ are
also known, see \cite[Lemma 1]{Ma}.
The group $J(\omega )$ has the basis $\{1,\omega ,\cdots ,\omega ^{r}\}$ for
some $r\geq 1$. Granted with the map $j$ the sequence (1.7) is applicable to
show that every $x\in H^{\ast }(G/\mathbb{Z}_{q})$ admits an expansion of
the form
\begin{quote}
$x=j(a_{0})+\omega \cup j(a_{1})+\cdots +\omega ^{r}\cup j(a_{r})$,
a_{i}\in H^{\ast }(G/\mathbb{Z}_{q})_{\left\langle \omega \right\rangle }$,
0\leq i\leq r$.
\end{quote}
\noindent That is the map $h$ is surjective. To show the formula (1.9)
consider an element $y=a_{0}+\omega \otimes a_{1}+\cdots +\omega ^{r}\otimes
a_{r}\in \ker h$. One infers from $g\circ h(y)=0$ that $a_{0}=0$. It follows
now from $0=h(y)=\omega \cdot (1\cup j(a_{1})+\cdots +\omega ^{r-1}\cup
j(a_{r}))$ that
\begin{quote}
$1\cup j(a_{1})+\cdots +\omega ^{r-1}\cup j(a_{r})\in \func{Im}\theta $
\end{quote}
\noindent by (1.8). That is $\ker h=\left\langle \omega \cdot \func{Im
\theta \right\rangle $.$\square $
\bigskip
Granted with Theorems 1.2 and 1.3 we can clarify the main ideas of our
approach. Firstly, Theorem 1.2 reduces the cohomology of a compact Lie group
$G$ to that of its semi--simple part $G^{\prime }$ by the Kunneth formula
H^{\ast }(G)=$ $H^{\ast }(G^{\prime })\otimes H^{\ast }(T^{r})$. Next, for a
semi--simple Lie group $G$ its universal covering $c:$ $G_{0}\rightarrow G$
can always be decomposed into a sequence of cyclic coverings
\begin{quote}
$c:G_{0}\overset{c_{1}}{\rightarrow }G_{1}\overset{c_{2}}{\rightarrow
\cdots \overset{c_{k}}{\rightarrow }G_{k}=G$
\end{quote}
\noindent in which the cohomology of the $1$--connected Lie group $G_{0}$ is
known \cite[Theorem 1.9]{DZ2}. The cohomology $H^{\ast }(G)$ in question can
be calculated, in principle, from the known one $H^{\ast }(G_{0})$ by a
repeatedly application of the exact sequence (1.8).
The remaining sections of the paper are so arranged. In Sections 2 and 3 we
develop the formulae and the constructions required to implement above
procedure. As applications the integral cohomology of the adjoint Lie groups
$PSU(n),PSp(n),PE_{6},PE_{7}$ are calculated in Section 4.
In addition, since the present work is a natural extension of the earlier
one \cite{DZ2}, we shall be free to adopt the notation and results developed
in \cite{DZ2}.
\section{Spectral sequence of the fibration $G\rightarrow G/T$}
Fix a maximal torus $T$ on $G$, and consider the Leray--Serre spectral
sequence $\{E_{r}^{\ast ,\ast }(G),d_{r}\}$ of the corresponding fibration
\begin{enumerate}
\item[(2.1)] $T\hookrightarrow G\overset{\pi }{\rightarrow }G/T$.
\end{enumerate}
\noindent It is well known that its second page is the Koszul complex with
\begin{enumerate}
\item[(2.2)] $E_{2}^{\ast ,\ast }(G)=H^{\ast }(G/T)\otimes H^{\ast }(T)$;
\item[(2.3)] $d_{2}(a\otimes t)=(\tau (t)\cup a)\otimes 1$ for $a\in H^{\ast
}(G/T)$, $t\in H^{1}(T)$
\end{enumerate}
\noindent where $\tau :$ $H^{1}(T)\rightarrow H^{2}(G/T)$ is the\textsl{\
Borel transgression} in the fibration (2.1).
Our calculation and construction with the exact sequence (1.8) actually take
place on the third page of the spectral sequence. In order to access
E_{3}^{\ast ,\ast }(G)$ we deduce a formula for the transgression $\tau $ in
Theorem 2.4, and give a concise characterization for the factor ring
H^{\ast }(G/T)$ of $E_{2}^{\ast ,\ast }(G)$ in Theorem 2.6. These results
are essential in Section 3 for us to construct explicit generators of the
ring $H^{\ast }(G)$ by certain polynomials in the Schubert classes on $G/T$.
\subsection{A formula for the Borel transgression $\protect\tau $}
In the diagram with top row the cohomology exact sequence of the pair $(G,T)$
\begin{quote}
\begin{tabular}{lllll}
$0\rightarrow H^{1}(G)\overset{i^{\ast }}{\rightarrow }$ & $H^{1}(T)$ &
\overset{\delta }{\rightarrow }$ & $H^{2}(G,T)$ & $\overset{j^{\ast }}
\rightarrow }H^{2}(G)\rightarrow \cdots $ \\
& & $\searrow \tau $ & $\quad \cong \uparrow \pi ^{\ast }$ & \\
& & & $H^{2}(G/T)$ &
\end{tabular
,
\end{quote}
\noindent the induced map $\pi ^{\ast }$ is an isomorphism by the $1
--connectness of the pair $(G,T)$. The \textsl{Borel} \textsl{transgression}
in the fibration (2.1) is $\tau =$ $(\pi ^{\ast })^{-1}\circ \delta $ (\cite
p.185]{Mc}).
\bigskip
\noindent \textbf{Lemma 2.1.} \textsl{The diffeomorphism type of the flag
manifold }$G/T$\textsl{\ depends only on the semi--simple part }$G^{\prime }$
\textsl{of the group }$G$\textsl{\ as}
\begin{enumerate}
\item[(2.4)] $G/T\cong \frac{G_{1}}{T_{1}}\times \cdots \times \frac{G_{k}}
T_{k}}$\textsl{\ (see (1.2)),}
\end{enumerate}
\noindent \textsl{where }$T_{i}$\textsl{\ is a maximal torus of the }$1
\textsl{--connected simple Lie group }$G_{i}$\textsl{, }$1\leq i\leq k
\textsl{.}
\textsl{The transgression }$\tau $ \textsl{fits into the following exact
sequence, where }$Tor(A)$\textsl{\ denotes the torsion subgroup of an
abelian group }$A$\textsl{,}
\begin{enumerate}
\item[(2.5)] $0\rightarrow H^{1}(G)\overset{j^{\ast }}{\rightarrow }H^{1}(T
\overset{\tau }{\rightarrow }H^{2}(G/T)\overset{\pi ^{\ast }}{\rightarrow
TorH^{2}(G)\rightarrow 0$.
\end{enumerate}
\noindent \textbf{Proof.} Let $T^{\prime }$ be a maximal torus of the
semi--simple part $G^{\prime }$ of $G$. By (1.1) a maximal torus of $G$ is
T=\left[ T^{\prime }\times \mathcal{Z}_{0}(G)\right] /F$. The diffeomorphism
(2.4) comes from the obvious relation $G/T=G^{\prime }/T^{\prime }$ and
(1.2).
Since the second homotopy group of a Lie group is trivial, the homotopy
exact sequence of $\pi $ contains the free resolution of the fundamental
group $\pi _{1}(G)$
\begin{quote}
$0\rightarrow \pi _{2}(G/T)\rightarrow \pi _{1}(T)\rightarrow \pi
_{1}(G)\rightarrow 0$.
\end{quote}
\noindent Applying the co--functor $Hom(,\mathbb{Z})$ to this sequence, and
using the Huriwicz isomorphisms $\pi _{2}(G/T)=H_{2}(G/T)$, $\pi
_{1}(T)=H_{1}(T)$, $\pi _{1}(G)=H_{1}(G)$ to substitute for the relevant
groups, one obtains (2.5).$\square $
\bigskip
By (1.3) we have $H^{1}(G)=H^{1}(T^{r})$, $r=\dim \mathcal{Z}_{0}(G)$. By
(2.5) the transgression $\tau $ annihilates the direct summand $H^{1}(T^{r})$
of $H^{1}(T)$ and hence, depends only on the semi--simple part of $G$. For
this reason we can assume below that the Lie group $G$ under consideration
is semi--simple.
Equip the Lie algebra $L(G)$ of $G$ with an inner product $(,)$ so that the
adjoint representation acts as isometries on $L(G)$. Let $L(T)\subset L(G)$
be the \textsl{Cartan subalgebra} corresponding to the fixed maximal torus
T $ on $G$, and fix a set $\Delta =\{\alpha _{1},\cdots ,\alpha
_{n}\}\subset L(T)$ of simple roots of $G$, where $n=\dim T$.
The Euclidean space $L(T)$ contains three distinguished lattices. Firstly,
the set $\{\alpha _{1},\cdots ,\alpha _{n}\}$ of simple roots generates
\textsl{the} \textsl{root lattice} $\Lambda _{r}$ of $G$. Next, the
pre--image of the exponential map $\exp :L(T)\rightarrow T$ at the group
unit $e\in T$ gives rise to the \textsl{unit lattice }$\Lambda _{e}:=\exp
^{-1}(e)$\textsl{\ }of $G$. Finally, using simple roots one defines the set
\Omega =\{\phi _{1},\cdots ,\phi _{n}\}$ of \textsl{fundamental dominant
weights} of $G$ by the formula $2(\phi _{i},\phi _{j})/(\alpha _{j},\alpha
_{j})=\delta _{i,j}$ that generates \textsl{the weight lattice} $\Lambda
_{\omega }$ of $G$.
Let $A=(b_{ij})_{n\times n}$,\ $b_{ij}=2(a_{i},\alpha _{j})/(\alpha
_{j},\alpha _{j})$, be the Cartan matrix of $G$, and let $A^{\tau }$\ be the
transpose of $A$. The following result can be found in \cite[(3.4)]{DL}.
\bigskip
\noindent \textbf{Lemma 2.2. }\textsl{On the space }$L(T)$ \textsl{one has }
\Lambda _{r}\subseteq \Lambda _{e}\subseteq \Lambda _{\omega }$\textsl{.}
\textsl{In addition}
\textsl{i) the group }$G$\textsl{\ is }$1$\textsl{--connected if and only if
}$\Lambda _{r}=\Lambda _{e}$\textsl{;}
\textsl{ii) the group }$G$\textsl{\ is adjoint if and only if }$\Lambda
_{e}=\Lambda _{\omega }$\textsl{;}
\textsl{iii) the basis }$\Delta $\textsl{\ on }$\Lambda _{r}$\textsl{\ can
be expressed by the basis }$\Omega $\textsl{\ on }$\Lambda _{\omega }$
\textsl{by the formula}
\begin{quote}
$\qquad \left( \alpha _{1},\cdots ,\alpha _{n}\right) =\left( \phi
_{1},\cdots ,\phi _{n}\right) \cdot A^{\tau }$.$\square $
\end{quote}
For a root $\alpha \in \Delta $ let $K(\alpha )\subset G$ be the subgroup
with Lie algebra $l_{\alpha }\oplus L_{\alpha }$, where $l_{\alpha }\subset
L(T)$ is the $1$--dimensional subspace spanned by $\alpha $, and $L_{\alpha
}\subset L(G)$ is the root space (viewed as an oriented real $2$--plane)
belonging to the root $\alpha $ (\cite[p.35]{H}). Then the circle subgroup
S^{1}=\exp (l_{\alpha })$ is a maximal torus on $K(\alpha )$, while quotient
space $K_{\alpha }/S^{1}$ is diffeomorphic to the $2$--dimensional sphere
S^{2}$. Moreover, the inclusion $(K_{\alpha },S^{1})\subset (G,T)$ induces
an embedding
\begin{enumerate}
\item[(2.6)] $s_{\alpha }:S^{2}=K_{\alpha }/S^{1}\rightarrow G/T$
\end{enumerate}
\noindent whose image is known as the \textsl{Schubert variety} associated
to the root $\alpha $ \cite{DZ0}. By the basis theorem of Chevalley \cite{Ch}
the maps $s_{\alpha }$ with $\alpha \in \Delta $ represent a basis of the
second homology $H_{2}(G/T)$. As a result if one lets $\omega _{i}\in
H^{2}(G/T)$\ be the Kronnecker dual of the homology class represented by the
map $s_{\alpha _{i}}$, then
\bigskip
\noindent \textbf{Lemma 2.3. }\textsl{The set }$\left\{ \omega _{1},\cdots
,\omega _{n}\right\} $\textsl{\ is a basis of the group }$H^{2}(G/T)$.
\square $
\bigskip
On the other hand let $\Theta =\{\theta _{1},\cdots ,\theta _{n}\}$ be a
basis for the unit lattice $\Lambda _{e}$. It defines $n$ oriented circle
subgroups on the maximal torus
\begin{enumerate}
\item[(2.7)] $\widetilde{\theta }_{i}:S^{1}=\mathbb{R}/\mathbb{Z}\rightarrow
T$, $\widetilde{\theta }_{i}(t):=\exp (t\theta _{i})$, $1\leq i\leq n$,
\end{enumerate}
\noindent that represent also a basis of the first homology $H_{1}(T)$. As
result if we let $t_{i}\in H^{1}(T)$ be the class Kronnecker dual to the map
$\widetilde{\theta }_{i}$, then
\begin{enumerate}
\item[(2.8)] $H^{\ast }(T)=\Lambda (t_{1},\cdots ,t_{n})$ (i.e. the exterior
ring generated by $t_{1},\cdots ,t_{n}$).
\end{enumerate}
\noindent Let $C(\Theta )=\left( c_{i,j}\right) _{n\times n}$\ be the matrix
expressing the ordered basis $\Delta $ by the ordered basis $\Theta $ in
view of the inclusion $\Lambda _{r}\subseteq \Lambda _{e}$ by Lemma 2.2.
Namely, $\left( \alpha _{1},\cdots ,\alpha _{n}\right) =\left( \theta
_{1},\cdots ,\theta _{n}\right) C(\Theta )$.
\bigskip
\noindent \textbf{Theorem 2.4.}\textsl{\ With respect to the basis\ (2.6)
and (2.8) on the groups }$H^{2}(G/T)$\textsl{\ and } $H^{1}(T)$\textsl{,\
the transgression }$\tau $ \textsl{is given by the formula}
\begin{enumerate}
\item[(2.9)] $\left( \tau (t_{1}),\cdots ,\tau (t_{n})\right) =\left( \omega
_{1},\cdots ,\omega _{n}\right) C(\Theta )$\textsl{.}
\end{enumerate}
\noindent \textbf{Proof. }Assume firstly\textbf{\ }that the group $G$ is $1
--connected. Then a basis $\Theta $ of the unit lattice $\Lambda
_{e}=\Lambda _{r}$ can be taken to be $\Delta =\{\alpha _{1},\cdots ,\alpha
_{n}\}$. Since $C(\Theta )$ is then the identity matrix we are bound to show
that $\tau (t_{i})=\omega _{i}$, $1\leq i\leq n$.
For each root $\alpha _{i}\in $ $\Delta $ the inclusion $(K(\alpha
_{i}),S^{1})\subset (G,T)$ induces the following bundle map over $s_{\alpha
_{i}}$, where by the $1$--connectness of the group $G$ the group $K(\alpha
_{i})$ is isomorphic to the $3$--sphere $S^{3}$ and $\pi _{i}$ is the Hopf
fibration over $S^{2}$,
\begin{quote}
$\qquad \qquad
\begin{array}{ccccc}
S^{1} & \rightarrow & K(\alpha _{i})=S^{3} & \overset{\pi _{i}}{\rightarrow }
& K(\alpha _{i})/S^{1}=S^{2} \\
\widetilde{\alpha }_{1}\downarrow \qquad & & \downarrow & & \downarrow
s_{\alpha _{i}} \\
T & \rightarrow & G & \overset{\pi }{\rightarrow } & G/T\qqua
\end{array
$
\end{quote}
\noindent This indicates that in the homotopy exact sequence of $\pi _{i}$
the connecting homomorphism $\partial $ satisfies $\partial \left[ \iota _{2
\right] =\left[ \iota _{1}\right] $, where $\iota _{r}$ is the identity on
the $r$--sphere. By the naturality of $\partial $ one gets in the homotopy
exact sequence of $\pi $ that $\partial \left[ s_{\alpha _{i}}\right] =\left[
\widetilde{\alpha }_{i}\right] $. This shows $\tau (t_{i})=$ $\omega _{i}$
as the map $\tau $ is dual to $\partial $ by the proof of Lemma 2.1.
In a general case let $d:(G_{0},T_{0})\rightarrow (G,T)$ be the universal
covering of $G$ with $T_{0}$ the maximal torus on $G_{0}$ corresponding to
T $. Then
\begin{quote}
$\exp =d\circ \exp _{0}:(L(G_{0}),L(T_{0}))\rightarrow
(G_{0},T_{0})\rightarrow (G,T)$.
\end{quote}
\noindent where $\exp $ (resp. $\exp _{0}$) is the exponential map of the
group $G$ (resp. $G_{0}$). It follows that, if we let $p(\Lambda
_{r},\Lambda _{e}):$ $T_{0}=L(T_{0})/\Lambda _{r}$ $\rightarrow
T=L(T_{0})/\Lambda _{e}$ be the covering map induced by the inclusion
\Lambda _{r}\subset \Lambda _{e}$ of the lattices, then
\begin{enumerate}
\item[(2.10)] $d\mid T_{0}=p(\Lambda _{r},\Lambda _{e}):T_{0}\rightarrow T$,
\end{enumerate}
\noindent and the induced map $p(\Lambda _{r},\Lambda _{e})_{\ast }$ on $\pi
_{1}(T_{0})$ is
\begin{enumerate}
\item[(2.11)] $p(\Lambda _{r},\Lambda _{e})_{\ast }[\widetilde{\alpha
_{i}]=c_{i,1}[\widetilde{\theta }_{1}]+\cdots +c_{i,n}[\widetilde{\theta
_{n}]$ with $C(\Theta )=\left( c_{ij}\right) _{n\times n}$.
\end{enumerate}
On the other hand the restriction $d\mid T_{0}$ fits in the commutative
diagram
\begin{enumerate}
\item[(2.12)]
\begin{array}{ccc}
\pi _{2}(G_{0}/T_{0}) & \underset{\cong }{\overset{\partial _{0}}
\rightarrow }} & \pi _{1}(T_{0}) \\
\parallel & & \qquad \downarrow (d\mid T_{0})_{\ast } \\
\pi _{2}(G/T) & \overset{\partial }{\rightarrow } & \pi _{1}(T
\end{array
$
\end{enumerate}
\noindent with $\partial _{0}$, $\partial $ the connecting homomorphisms in
the homotopy exact sequences of the bundles $G_{0}\rightarrow G_{0}/T_{0}$,
G\rightarrow G/T$, respectively, where the vertical identification on the
left comes from (2.1). It follows that, for each root $\alpha _{i}\in \Delta
$,
\begin{quote}
$\partial \left[ s_{\alpha _{i}}\right] =(d\mid T_{0})_{\ast }\circ \partial
_{0}\left[ s_{\alpha _{i}}\right] $ (by the diagram (2.12))
$\qquad =(d\mid T_{0})_{\ast }\left[ \widetilde{\alpha }_{i}\right] $ (by
the proof of the previous case)
$\qquad =p(\Lambda _{r},\Lambda _{e})_{\ast }(\left[ \widetilde{\alpha }_{i
\right] )$ (by (2.10)).
\end{quote}
\noindent The proof is completed by (2.11), and by the fact that the map
\tau $ is dual to $\partial $.$\square $
\bigskip
\noindent \textbf{Example 2.5.} Formula (2.9) is ready to evaluate the
transgression $\tau $, hence the differential $d_{2}$ on $E_{2}^{\ast ,\ast
}(G)$. As examples we have by Lemma 2.2 that
i) if the group $G$ is $1$--connected one can take $\Delta =\{\alpha
_{1},\cdots ,\alpha _{n}\}$ as a basis for the unit lattice $\Lambda _{e}$,
and the transition matrix $C(\Theta )$ is the identity;
ii) if the group $G$ is of the adjoint type, then the set $\Omega =\{\phi
_{1},\cdots ,\phi _{n}\}$ of fundamental dominant weights is a basis of
\Lambda _{e}$, and the corresponding transition matrix $C(\Theta )$ from
\Lambda _{e}$ to $\Lambda _{r}$ is\textsl{\ }the transpose $A^{\tau }$ of
the Cartan matrix $A$.$\square $
\subsection{Schubert presentation of the ring $H^{\ast }(G/T)$}
Turning to a concise presentation of the factor subring $H^{\ast }(G/T)$ of
E_{2}^{\ast ,\ast }(G)$ assume that the rank of the semi--simple part of $G$
is $n$, and let $\{\omega _{1},\cdots ,\omega _{n}\}$ be the Schubert basis
on $H^{2}(G/T)$. It is shown in \cite[Theorem 1.2]{DZ1} that
\bigskip
\noindent \textbf{Theorem 2.6. }\textsl{For each Lie group }$G$\textsl{\
there exist a set }$\left\{ y_{1},\cdots ,y_{m}\right\} $\textsl{\ of
Schubert classes on }$G/T$\textsl{\ with }$\deg y_{i}$\textsl{\ }$>2$\textsl
,\ so that the set }$\{\omega _{1},\cdots ,\omega _{n},y_{1},\cdots ,y_{m}\}
\textsl{\ is a minimal system of generators of the integral cohomology ring
$H^{\ast }(G/T)$\textsl{.}
\textsl{With respect to these generators the ring }$H^{\ast }(G/T)$ \textsl
has the presentation}
\begin{enumerate}
\item[(2.13)] $H^{\ast }(G/T)=\mathbb{Z}[\omega _{1},\cdots ,\omega
_{n},y_{1},\cdots ,y_{m}]/\left\langle h_{i},f_{j},g_{j}\right\rangle
_{1\leq i\leq k;1\leq j\leq m}$\textsl{,}
\end{enumerate}
\noindent \textsl{in which}
\begin{quote}
\textsl{i) for each }$1\leq i\leq k$\textsl{, }$h_{i}\in \left\langle \omega
_{1},\cdots ,\omega _{n}\right\rangle $\textsl{;}
\textsl{ii) for each }$1\leq j\leq m$\textsl{, the pair }$(f_{j},g_{j})
\textsl{\ of polynomials is related to the Schubert class }$y_{j}$\textsl{\
in the fashion }
$\qquad f_{j}$\textsl{\ }$=$\textsl{\ }$p_{j}y_{j}+\alpha _{j}$\textsl{,
\quad }$g_{j}=y_{j}^{k_{j}}+\beta _{j}$\textsl{, }
\textsl{where }$p_{j}\in \{2,3,5\}$\textsl{\ and }$\alpha _{j},\beta _{j}\in
\left\langle \omega _{1},\cdots ,\omega _{n}\right\rangle $\textsl{.}
\square $
\end{quote}
\noindent \textbf{Example 2.7.} For the cases $G=SU(n),Sp(n)$, $E_{6}$ and
E_{7}$ we refer to Theorem 5.1 for the explicit form of the formula (2.13)
of the rings $H^{\ast }(G/T)$.$\square $
\section{Construction and computation in $E_{3}^{\ast ,\ast }(G)$}
By the fiber degrees the third page of the spectral sequence $\{E_{r}^{\ast
,\ast }(G),d_{r}\}$ has the decomposition $E_{3}^{\ast ,\ast
}(G)=E_{3}^{\ast ,0}(G)\oplus E_{3}^{\ast ,1}(G)\oplus \cdots \oplus
E_{3}^{\ast ,N}(G)$, $N=\dim T$. Based on Theorems 2.4 and 2.6 we single out
certain elements in the initial two summands $E_{3}^{\ast ,0}$ and
E_{3}^{\ast ,1}$, which will show to generate the ring $H^{\ast }(G)$
multiplicatively. Along the way we demonstrate that, with respect to our
explicit constructions of the generators on the ring $H^{\ast }(G)$, the
Bockstein homomorphism, Steenrod operators, as well as the homomorphism
\theta $ in (1.8), can be effectively evaluated by simple formulae, see
Section 3.4 and Theorem 3.10.
\subsection{The term $E_{3}^{\ast ,0}(G)$}
The formula (2.3) of the differential $d_{2}:E_{2}^{\ast ,\ast
}(G)\rightarrow E_{2}^{\ast ,\ast }(G)$ implies that $E_{3}^{\ast
,0}(G)=H^{\ast }(G/T)/\left\langle \func{Im}\tau \right\rangle $. From
(2.13) one gets
\bigskip
\noindent \textbf{Lemma 3.1. }$E_{3}^{\ast ,0}(G)=H^{\ast }(G/T)\mid _{\tau
(t_{1})=\cdots =\tau (t_{N})=0}$\textsl{.}$\square $
\subsection{Constructions in $E_{3}^{\ast ,1}(G)$}
For a $d_{2}$--cocycle $\gamma \in E_{2}^{\ast ,\ast }(G)$ write $[\gamma
]\in E_{3}^{\ast ,\ast }(G)$ for its cohomology class. Based on Theorems 2.4
and 2.6, we present two ways to construct elements in $E_{3}^{\ast ,1}(G)$.
The first one resorts to $\ker \tau $, while the second utilizes $\func{Im
\tau $.
For a $t\in \ker \tau $ the element $1\otimes t\in E_{2}^{0,1}$ is clear a
d_{2}$--cocycle. The class $\iota (t):=[1\otimes t]\in E_{3}^{0,1}(G)$ will
be called a \textsl{primary} $\QTR{sl}{1}$\textsl{--form} of $G$ with base
degree $0$. Moreover, in view of the exact sequence (2.5) one has
\bigskip
\noindent \textbf{Lemma 3.2. }\textsl{The map }$\iota :\ker \tau \rightarrow
$\textsl{\ }$E_{3}^{0,1}(G)=H^{1}(G)$\textsl{\ is an isomorphism.}$\square $
\bigskip
For the second construction we take firstly the ring $\mathbb{Z}$ of
integers as coefficient for cohomologies. In view of the formula (2.13) one
has the surjective ring map
\begin{quote}
$f:\mathbb{Z}[\omega _{i},y_{j}]_{1\leq i\leq n,1\leq j\leq m}\rightarrow
H^{\ast }(G/T)$ with $\ker f=$ $\left\langle h_{i},f_{j},g_{j}\right\rangle
.
\end{quote}
\noindent Since $f$ is an isomorphism in degree $2$ the transgression $\tau $
has a unique lift $\widetilde{\tau }$ into the free polynomial ring $\mathbb
Z}[\omega _{i},y_{j}]$ subject to the relation $\tau =f\circ \widetilde{\tau
}$. For a polynomial $P\in \left\langle \func{Im}\widetilde{\tau
\right\rangle $ we can write
\begin{enumerate}
\item[(3.1)] $P=p_{1}\cdot \widetilde{\tau }(t_{1})+\cdots +p_{N}\cdot
\widetilde{\tau }(t_{N})$ with $p_{i}\in \mathbb{Z}[\omega _{i},y_{j}]$,
\end{enumerate}
\noindent and set $\widetilde{P}:=f(p_{1})\otimes t_{1}+\cdots +$
f(p_{N})\otimes t_{N}\in E_{2}^{\ast ,1}(G)$. It is crucial for us to note
from $f(P)=d_{2}(\widetilde{P})$ (by (2.3)) that
\begin{quote}
"$P\in \left\langle \func{Im}\widetilde{\tau }\right\rangle \cap \ker f$
\textsl{implies} $\widetilde{P}\in \ker d_{2}$".
\end{quote}
\noindent Most importantly, one can show that
\bigskip
\noindent \textbf{Lemma 3.3.} \textsl{The map }$\varphi :\left\langle \func
Im}\widetilde{\tau }\right\rangle \cap \ker f\rightarrow E_{3}^{\ast ,1}(G)
\textsl{\ by }$\varphi (P)=[\widetilde{P}]$\textsl{\ is well defined. }
\bigskip
\noindent \textbf{Proof.}\textsl{\ }We are bound to show the class $
\widetilde{P}]\in E_{3}^{\ast ,1}(G)$ is independent of a choice of the
expansion (3.1). Assume in addition to (3.1) that one has a second expansion
$P=h_{1}\cdot \widetilde{\tau }(t_{1})+\cdots +h_{N}\cdot \widetilde{\tau
(t_{N})$. Then the equation
\begin{quote}
$(p_{1}-h_{1})\cdot \widetilde{\tau }(t_{1})+\cdots +(p_{N}-h_{N})\cdot
\widetilde{\tau }(t_{N})=0$
\end{quote}
\noindent holds in the ring $\mathbb{Z}[\omega _{i},y_{j}]$. We can assume
below that $p_{1}-h_{1}\neq 0$.
\noindent \textbf{Case 1.} The set $\{\widetilde{\tau }(t_{1}),\cdots
\widetilde{\tau }(t_{N})\}$\ is a basis of $\func{Im}\widetilde{\tau }$:
Since $\{\widetilde{\tau }(t_{1}),\cdots ,\widetilde{\tau }(t_{N})\}\subset
\mathbb{Z}[\omega _{i},y_{j}]$ is algebraically independent, the above
equation implies that all the differences $p_{i}-h_{i}$ with $i\neq 1$ are
divisible by $\widetilde{\tau }(t_{1})$. That is $p_{i}-h_{i}=q_{i}\cdot
\widetilde{\tau }(t_{1})$ for some $q_{i}\in \mathbb{Z}[\omega _{i},y_{j}]$,
$2\leq i\leq N$. The proof is done by the calculation
\begin{quote}
$d_{2}(f(q_{2})\otimes t_{1}t_{2}+\cdots +f(q_{N})\otimes t_{1}t_{N})$
$=f(p_{1}-h_{1})\otimes t_{1}+\cdots +f(p_{N}-h_{N})\otimes t_{N}$.
\end{quote}
\noindent \textbf{Case 2.} The set $\{\widetilde{\tau }(t_{1}),\cdots
\widetilde{\tau }(t_{N})\}$\ is linearly dependent $\func{Im}\widetilde{\tau
}$:\textbf{\ }Take a subset $\{\overline{t}_{1},\cdots ,\overline{t
_{n^{\prime }}\}\subset H^{1}(T)$ ($n^{\prime }\leq N$) so that its
\widetilde{\tau }$--image is a basis of the group $\func{Im}\widetilde{\tau }
$. Let $B=(b_{ij})_{n^{\prime }\times N}$ be the matrix expressing the
elements $\tau (t_{i})$ by the basis elements $\{\widetilde{\tau }(\overline
t}_{1}),\cdots ,\widetilde{\tau }(\overline{t}_{n^{\prime }})\}$. Denote by
B^{\tau }$ the transpose of $B$ and set
\begin{quote}
$(p_{1}^{\prime },\cdots ,p_{n^{\prime }}^{\prime })=(p_{1},\cdots
,p_{N})\cdot B^{\tau }$, $(h_{1}^{\prime },\cdots ,h_{n^{\prime }}^{\prime
})=(h_{1},\cdots ,h_{N})\cdot B^{\tau }$.
\end{quote}
\noindent Then, in addition to the next two expansions of $P$ in $\mathbb{Z
[\omega _{i},y_{j}]_{1\leq i\leq n,1\leq j\leq m}$
\begin{quote}
$P=p_{1}^{\prime }\cdot \widetilde{\tau }(\overline{t}_{1})+\cdots
+p_{n^{\prime }}^{\prime }\cdot \widetilde{\tau }(\overline{t}_{n^{\prime
}})=h_{1}^{\prime }\cdot \widetilde{\tau }(\overline{t}_{1})+\cdots
+h_{n^{\prime }}^{\prime }\cdot \widetilde{\tau }(\overline{t}_{n^{\prime
}}) $,
\end{quote}
\noindent one has the following relations in $E_{2}^{\ast ,1}(G)$
\begin{quote}
$f(p_{1})\otimes t_{1}+\cdots +$ $f(p_{N})\otimes t_{N}=f(p_{1}^{\prime
})\otimes \overline{t}_{1}+\cdots +$ $f(p_{n^{\prime }}^{\prime })\otimes
\overline{t}_{n^{\prime }}$,
$f(h_{1})\otimes t_{1}+\cdots +$ $f(h_{N})\otimes t_{N}=f(h_{1}^{\prime
})\otimes \overline{t}_{1}+\cdots +$ $f(h_{n^{\prime }}^{\prime })\otimes
\overline{t}_{n^{\prime }}$.
\end{quote}
\noindent The proof is done by the following computation in $E_{3}^{\ast
,1}(G)$
\begin{quote}
$\left[ f(p_{1})\otimes t_{1}+\cdots +f(p_{N})\otimes t_{N}\right] =\left[
f(p_{1}^{\prime })\otimes \overline{t}_{1}+\cdots +f(p_{n^{\prime }}^{\prime
})\otimes \overline{t}_{n^{\prime }}\right] $
$=\left[ f(h_{1}^{\prime })\otimes \overline{t}_{1}+\cdots +f(h_{n^{\prime
}}^{\prime })\otimes \overline{t}_{n^{\prime }}\right] =\left[
f(h_{1})\otimes t_{1}+\cdots +f(h_{N})\otimes t_{N}\right] $,
\end{quote}
\noindent where the second equality has been shown in Case 1.$\square $
\bigskip
The maps $\widetilde{\tau }$ and $\varphi $ above has its analogue for
cohomology over a finite field $\mathbb{F}_{p}$. Precisely, from Theorem 2.6
one can deduce a presentation of the ring $H^{\ast }(G/T;\mathbb{F}_{p})$ in
the following form (\cite[Lemma 2.3]{DZ3})
\begin{enumerate}
\item[(3.2)] $H^{\ast }(G/T;\mathbb{F}_{p})=\mathbb{F}_{p}[\omega
_{1},\ldots ,\omega _{n},y_{t}]/\left\langle \delta _{1},\cdots ,\delta
_{n},y_{t}^{k_{t}}+\sigma _{t}\right\rangle _{\text{ }t\in E(G,p)}$,
\end{enumerate}
\noindent where $\delta _{s}\in \mathbb{F}_{p}[\omega _{1},\ldots ,\omega
_{n}]$, $\sigma _{t}\in \left\langle \omega _{1},\ldots ,\omega
_{n}\right\rangle $, $E(G,p)=\{1\leq t\leq m;p_{t}=p\}$. Based on (3.2) one
formulates the $\mathbb{F}_{p}$--analogies of the maps $f$, $\widetilde{\tau
}$ and $\varphi $ as
\begin{quote}
$f_{p}:\mathbb{F}_{p}[\omega _{1},\ldots ,\omega _{n},y_{t}]_{\text{ }t\in
E(G,p)}\rightarrow H^{\ast }(G/T;\mathbb{F}_{p})$,
$\widetilde{\tau }_{p}:H^{1}(T;\mathbb{F}_{p})\rightarrow \mathbb{F
_{p}[\omega _{1},\ldots ,\omega _{n},y_{t}]_{\text{ }t\in E(G,p)}$,
$\varphi _{p}:\left\langle \func{Im}\widetilde{\tau }_{p}\right\rangle \cap
\left\langle \ker f_{p}\right\rangle \rightarrow E_{3}^{\ast ,1}(G;\mathbb{F
_{p})$.
\end{quote}
\noindent The proof of Lemma 3.3 is applicable to show that
\bigskip
\noindent \textbf{Lemma 3.4.} \textsl{The correspondence }$\varphi _{p}
\textsl{\ is well defined. In particular}
\begin{quote}
$\varphi _{p}(P^{\prime }P)=0$\textsl{\ if }$P^{\prime }\in \left\langle
\func{Im}\widetilde{\tau }_{p}\right\rangle $\textsl{\ and }$P\in \ker f_{p}
\textsl{.}$\square $
\end{quote}
\subsection{Extension from $E_{3}^{\ast ,\ast }(G)$ to $H^{\ast }(G)$}
In preparation to solve the extension problem from $E_{3}^{\ast ,\ast }(G)$
to $H^{\ast }(G)$ we let $F^{p}$ be the filtration on $H^{\ast }(G)$ defined
by the fibration (2.1). That is
\begin{center}
$0=F^{r+1}(H^{r}(G))\subseteq F^{r}(H^{r}(G))\subseteq \cdots \subseteq
F^{0}(H^{r}(G))=H^{r}(G)$
\end{center}
\noindent with $E_{\infty }^{p,q}(G)=F^{p}(H^{p+q}(G))/F^{p+1}(H^{p+q}(G))$.
The routine relation $d_{r}(E_{r}^{\ast ,0}(G))=0$ for $r\geq 2$ yields the
sequence of quotient maps
\begin{center}
$H^{r}(G/T)=E_{2}^{r,0}\rightarrow E_{3}^{r,0}\rightarrow \cdots \rightarrow
E_{\infty }^{r,0}=F^{r}(H^{r}(G))\subset H^{r}(G)$
\end{center}
\noindent whose composition agrees with the induces map $\pi ^{\ast
}:H^{\ast }(G/T)\rightarrow H^{\ast }(G)$ \cite[P.147]{Mc}. For this reason
we can reserve $\pi ^{\ast }$ also for the composition
\begin{enumerate}
\item[(3.3)] $\pi ^{\ast }:E_{3}^{\ast ,0}(G)\rightarrow \cdots \rightarrow
E_{\infty }^{\ast ,0}(G)=F^{r}(H^{r}(G))\subset H^{\ast }(G)$.
\end{enumerate}
The property $H^{odd}(G/T)=0$ by Theorem 3.1 indicates that $E_{r}^{odd,q}=0$
for $r,q\geq 0$. This implies that
F^{2k+1}(H^{2k+1}(G))=F^{2k+2}(H^{2k+1}(G))=0$ and that
\begin{quote}
$E_{\infty }^{2k,1}(G)=F^{2k}(H^{2k+1}(G))\subset H^{2k+1}(G)$.
\end{quote}
\noindent Combining this with $d_{r}(E_{r}^{\ast,1})=0$ for $r\geq3$ yields
the composition
\begin{enumerate}
\item[(3.4)] $\kappa :E_{3}^{\ast ,1}(G)\rightarrow \cdots \rightarrow
E_{\infty }^{\ast ,1}(G)\subset H^{2t+1}(G)$
\end{enumerate}
\noindent that interprets directly elements of $E_{3}^{\ast ,1}$ as
cohomology classes of the group $G$.
\bigskip
\noindent \textbf{Definition 3.5.} For a polynomial $P\in \ker f\cap
\left\langle \func{Im}\widetilde{\tau }\right\rangle $ (resp. $P\in \ker
f_{p}\cap \left\langle \func{Im}\widetilde{\tau }_{p}\right\rangle $) we
shall refer to the class $\kappa \varphi (P)\in H^{\ast }(G)$ (resp. $\kappa
\varphi _{p}(P)\in H^{\ast }(G;\mathbb{F}_{p})$) as \textsl{the primary }$1
\textsl{--form on }$G$\textsl{\ with} \textsl{characteristic polynomial} $P$
$\square $
\bigskip
\noindent \textbf{Example 3.6.} If the group $G$ is $1$--connected then
\left\langle \func{Im}\widetilde{\tau }\right\rangle =\left\langle \omega
_{1},\cdots ,\omega _{n}\right\rangle $ (resp. $\left\langle \func{Im
\widetilde{\tau }_{p}\right\rangle =\left\langle \omega _{1},\cdots ,\omega
_{n}\right\rangle $) by Theorem 2.4, and the presentation (2.13) implies
that the set of polynomials
\begin{quote}
$S(G)=\{h_{i},p_{j}\beta _{j}-y_{j}^{k_{j}}\alpha _{j}\mid 1\leq i\leq
k,1\leq j\leq m\}$
(resp. $S_{p}(G):=\left\{ \delta _{1},\cdots ,\delta _{n}\right\} $)
\end{quote}
\noindent belongs to $\ker f\cap \left\langle \func{Im}\widetilde{\tau
\right\rangle $ (resp. to $\ker f_{p}\cap \left\langle \func{Im}\widetilde
\tau }_{p}\right\rangle $). It will be called \textsl{a set of primary
characteristic polynomials of }$G$\textsl{\ over} $\mathbb{Z}$ (resp.
\textsl{over} $\mathbb{F}_{p}$).
It has been shown in \cite{DZ2,DZ3} that
\textsl{i) the square free products of the primary }$1$\textsl{--forms }
\kappa \circ \varphi (P)$\textsl{\ with }$P\in S(G)$\textsl{\ is a basis of
the free part of the integral cohomology }$H^{\ast }(G)$\textsl{;}
\textsl{ii) the ring }$H^{\ast }(G;\mathbb{F}_{p})$\textsl{\ is generated by
the set }$\left\{ \kappa \circ \varphi _{p}(\delta )\mid \delta \in
S_{p}(G)\right\} $\textsl{\ of primary }$1$\textsl{--forms, together with }
\pi ^{\ast }(y_{t})$\textsl{, }$t\in E(G,p)$\textsl{.}
\noindent In Section 4 these results will act as the input for computing the
cohomologies of the adjoint Lie groups $PG$.$\square $
\subsection{Steenrod operations on $H^{\ast }(G;\mathbb{F}_{p})$}
Let $\mathcal{A}_{{p}}$ be the \textsl{Steenrod algebra} with $\mathcal{P
^{k}\in \mathcal{A}_{{p}}$, $k\geq 1$, the $k^{th}$ \textsl{reduced power}
(if $p=2$ it is also customary to write $Sq^{2k}$ instead of $\mathcal{P
^{k} $), and with $\delta _{p}=r_{p}\circ \beta _{p}\in \mathcal{A}_{{p}}$
the \textsl{Bockstein operator} \cite{SE}. We can reduce the $\mathcal{A}_{{
}}$ action on the primary $1$--forms $\kappa \varphi _{p}(P)$ to computation
with the characteristic polynomials $P$.
Since the Koszul complex $E_{2}^{\ast ,\ast }(G)$ is torsion free one has
for a prime $p$ the short exact sequence of complexes
\begin{quote}
$0\rightarrow $ $E_{2}^{\ast ,\ast }(G)\overset{\cdot p}{\rightarrow
E_{2}^{\ast ,\ast }(G)\overset{r_{p}}{\rightarrow }E_{2}^{\ast ,\ast }(G
\mathbb{F}_{p})\rightarrow 0$.
\end{quote}
\noindent With respect to the maps $\kappa $ and $\pi ^{\ast }$ the
connecting homomorphism $\widehat{\beta }_{p}$ of the associated cohomology
exact sequence clearly satisfies the commutative diagram
\begin{enumerate}
\item[(3.5)]
\begin{tabular}{lll}
$E_{3}^{\ast ,1}(G;\mathbb{F}_{p})$ & $\overset{\widehat{\beta }_{p}}
\rightarrow }$ & $E_{3}^{\ast ,0}(G)$ \\
$\kappa \downarrow $ & & $\pi ^{\ast }\downarrow $ \\
$H^{\ast }(G;\mathbb{F}_{p})$ & $\overset{\beta _{p}}{\rightarrow }$ &
H^{\ast }(G)
\end{tabular
.
\end{enumerate}
\noindent In addition, by Lemma 3.1 the quotient map $H^{\ast
}(G/T)\rightarrow E_{3}^{\ast ,0}(G)$ is
\begin{quote}
$f(P)\rightarrow f(P)\mid _{\tau (t_{1})=\cdots =\tau (t_{N})=0}$, $P\in
\mathbb{Z}[\omega _{i},y_{j}]$.
\end{quote}
\noindent Let $P_{0}\in \left\langle \func{Im}\widetilde{\tau }\right\rangle
$ be an integral lift of a polynomial $P\in \ker f_{p}\cap \left\langle
\func{Im}\widetilde{\tau }_{p}\right\rangle $ (i.e. $P_{0}\equiv P\func{mod
p $).\textsl{\ }The diagram chasing
\begin{quote}
\begin{array}{ccccc}
& & \varphi (P_{0}) & \overset{r_{p}}{\rightarrow } & \varphi _{p}(P) \\
& & d_{2}\downarrow \quad & & d_{2}\downarrow \quad \\
\frac{1}{p}f(P_{0}) & \overset{\cdot p}{\longrightarrow } & f(P_{0}) & &
\end{array
$
\end{quote}
\noindent in above short exact sequence shows that
\bigskip
\noindent \textbf{Lemma 3.7.} $\beta _{p}(\kappa \circ \varphi _{p}(P))=\pi
^{\ast }(\frac{1}{p}f(P_{0})\mid _{\tau (t_{1})=\cdots =\tau (t_{N})=0})$.
\square $
\bigskip
Let $c:$ $(G_{0},T_{0})\rightarrow (G,T)$ be the universal covering of a
semi--simple Lie group $G$, and consider the fibration induced by the
inclusion $i:T_{0}\rightarrow G_{0}$
\begin{enumerate}
\item[(3.6)] $G/T\overset{\psi }{\hookrightarrow }BT_{0}\overset{Bi}
\rightarrow }BG_{0}$,
\end{enumerate}
\noindent where $BT_{0}$ (resp. $BG_{0}$) is the classifying space of the
group $T_{0}$ (resp. $G_{0}$). It is known that the compositions $\widetilde
s}_{\alpha }:=\psi \circ s_{\alpha }:S^{2}\rightarrow BT_{0}$ with $\alpha
\in \Delta $ represent a basis of the group $H_{2}(BT_{0})$, where
s_{\alpha }$ are the maps defined by (2.6). As a result we can also write
\{\omega _{1},\ldots ,\omega _{n}\}$ for the basis on $H^{2}(BT_{0})$
Kronnecker dual to the ordered basis $\{\widetilde{s}_{\alpha }\mid \alpha
_{i}\in \Delta \}$ on $H_{2}(BT_{0})$. In this sense $\psi ^{\ast }
\overline{f}_{p}$, where $\overline{f}_{p}$ denotes the restriction of
f_{p} $ on the subalgebra $H^{\ast }(BT_{0};\mathbb{F}_{p})=\mathbb{F
_{p}[\omega _{1},\ldots ,\omega _{n}]$. Since the lift $\widetilde{\tau
_{p} $ of the transgression $\tau $ takes values in $H^{\ast }(BT_{0}
\mathbb{F}_{p})$ one has the subspace
\begin{quote}
$\ker \overline{f}_{p}\cap \left\langle \func{Im}\widetilde{\tau
_{p}\right\rangle \subset H^{\ast }(BT_{0};\mathbb{F}_{p})$
\end{quote}
\noindent which is clearly closed under the $\mathcal{A}_{{p}}$ action on
H^{\ast }(BT_{0};\mathbb{F}_{p})$. The proof of \cite[Lemma 3.2]{DZ3} is
applicable to show the following formula, that reduces the $\mathcal{P}^{k}$
action on $H^{\ast }(G;\mathbb{F}_{p})$ to that on the much simpler
\mathcal{A}_{{p}}$--algebra $H^{\ast }(BT_{0};\mathbb{F}_{p})$.
\bigskip
\noindent \textbf{Lemma 3.8.} \textsl{For} \textsl{a characteristic} \textsl
polynomial} $P\in \ker \overline{f}_{p}\cap \left\langle \func{Im}\widetilde
\tau }_{p}\right\rangle $ \textsl{one has}
\begin{enumerate}
\item[(3.7)] $\mathcal{P}^{k}(\kappa \circ \varphi _{p}(P))=\kappa \circ
\varphi _{p}(\mathcal{P}^{k}(P))$.$\square $
\end{enumerate}
\subsection{A refinement of the exact sequence (1.8)}
Returning to the situation concerned by Theorem 1.3 let $G$ be a
semi--simple Lie group $G$ whose center $\mathcal{Z}(G)$ contains the cyclic
group $\mathbb{Z}_{q}$. Then the circle bundle $C$ on the quotient group $G
\mathbb{Z}_{q}$ fits into the commutative diagram
\begin{enumerate}
\item[(3.8)]
\begin{array}{ccccc}
S^{1} & \hookrightarrow & \left[ T\times S^{1}\right] /\mathbb{Z}_{q} &
\overset{C^{\prime }}{\rightarrow } & T^{\prime } \\
\parallel & & \cap \quad & & \cap \quad \\
S^{1} & \hookrightarrow & \left[ G\times S^{1}\right] /\mathbb{Z}_{q} &
\overset{C}{\rightarrow } & G/\mathbb{Z}_{q} \\
& & \pi ^{\prime }\downarrow \quad & & \pi \downarrow \quad \\
& & G/T & = & G/
\end{array
$,
\end{enumerate}
\noindent where $T\subset G$ is a fixed maximal torus on $G$, $T^{\prime
}:=T/\mathbb{Z}_{q}$, the vertical maps $\pi ^{\prime }$ and $\pi $ are the
obvious quotients by the maximal torus, and where $C^{\prime }$ denotes the
restriction of $C$ to $\left[ T\times S^{1}\right] /\mathbb{Z}_{q}$ . Since
the maximal torus $\left[ T\times S^{1}\right] /\mathbb{Z}_{q}$\ of $\left[
G\times S^{1}\right] /\mathbb{Z}_{q}$ has the factorization $T^{\prime
}\times S^{1}$ so that $C^{\prime }$\ is the projection onto the first
factor (by the proof of Theorem 1.2), one can take a basis $\Theta =\{\theta
_{1},\cdots ,\theta _{n},\theta _{0}\}$ ($n=\dim T^{\prime }$) for the unit
lattice of the group $\left[ G\times S^{1}\right] /\mathbb{Z}_{q}$, so that
the tangent map of $C^{\prime }$ at the group unit $e$ carries the subset
\{\theta _{1},\cdots ,\theta _{n}\}$ to a basis of the unit lattice of $G
\mathbb{Z}_{q}$. As a result if we let $\{t_{1},\cdots ,t_{n},t_{0}\}$ be
the basis of $H^{1}(\left[ T\times S^{1}\right] /\mathbb{Z}_{q})$
corresponding to $\Theta $ in the manner of (2.8), then
\begin{quote}
a) $C^{\prime \ast }$ maps $H^{\ast }(T^{\prime })$ isomorphically onto the
subring $\Lambda ^{\ast }(t_{1},\cdots ,t_{n})$ of $H^{\ast }(\left[ T\times
S^{1}\right] /\mathbb{Z}_{q})=\Lambda ^{\ast }(t_{1},\cdots ,t_{n},t_{0})$;
b) the transgression $\tau $ in $\pi $ is the restriction of $\tau ^{\prime
} $ on $H^{1}(T^{\prime })$.
\end{quote}
\noindent Summarizing, the bundle map $C$ from $\pi ^{\prime }$ to $\pi $
fits into the short exact sequence
\begin{enumerate}
\item[(3.9)] $0\rightarrow E_{2}^{\ast ,k}(G/\mathbb{Z}_{q})\overset{C^{\ast
}}{\rightarrow }E_{2}^{\ast ,k}(\left[ G\times S^{1}\right] /\mathbb{Z}_{q}
\overset{\overline{\theta }}{\rightarrow }E_{2}^{\ast ,k-1}(G/\mathbb{Z
_{q})\rightarrow 0$,
\end{enumerate}
\noindent where the quotient map $\overline{\theta }$ has the following
description: if $x\in H^{\ast }(G/T)$, $y=y_{0}+t_{0}\cdot y_{1}\in H^{\ast
}(\left[ T\times S^{1}\right] /\mathbb{Z}_{q})$ with $y_{0},y_{1}\in \Lambda
^{\ast }(t_{1},\cdots ,t_{n})$, then
\begin{enumerate}
\item[(3.10)] $\overline{\theta }(x\otimes y)=x\otimes y_{1}$.
\end{enumerate}
\noindent It follows from (3.9) that one has an exact sequence of the form
\begin{enumerate}
\item[(3.11)] ${\small \cdots \rightarrow }E_{3}^{\ast ,r}(G/Z_{q})\overset
{\small C}^{\ast }}{{\small \rightarrow }}E_{3}^{\ast ,r}(\left[ G\times
S^{1}\right] /Z_{q})\overset{\overline{\theta }}{{\small \rightarrow }
E_{3}^{\ast ,r-1}(G/Z_{q})\overset{{\small \varpi }}{{\small \rightarrow }
E_{3}^{\ast ,r-1}(G/Z_{q})${\tiny \ }$\overset{{\small C}^{\ast }}{{\small
\rightarrow }}{\small \cdots }$
\end{enumerate}
\noindent in which the map $\varpi $\ is induced by the endomorphism\textsl
\ }$x\otimes y\rightarrow (x\cup \varpi )\otimes y$ on $E_{2}^{\ast ,\ast
}(G/\mathbb{Z}_{q})$ with $\varpi :=\tau ^{\prime }(t_{0})$.
With respect to the multiplicative structure inherited from that on
E_{2}^{\ast ,\ast }$ the third page $E_{3}^{\ast ,\ast }$ is a bi-graded
ring \cite[P.668]{Wh}. Let $J(\varpi )$ and $\left\langle \varpi
\right\rangle $ be respectively the subring and the ideal of $E_{3}^{\ast
,\ast }(G/\mathbb{Z}_{q})$ generated by the class $\varpi \in E_{3}^{2,0}(G
\mathbb{Z}_{q})$. Write $E_{3}^{\ast ,\ast }(G/\mathbb{Z}_{q})_{\left\langle
\varpi \right\rangle }$ for the quotient ring $E_{3}^{\ast ,\ast }(G/\mathbb
Z}_{q})/\left\langle \varpi \right\rangle $ with quotient map $g$. Then, in
addition to the exact sequence
\begin{enumerate}
\item[(3.12)] $0\rightarrow \left\langle \varpi \right\rangle \rightarrow
E_{3}^{\ast ,\ast }(G/\mathbb{Z}_{q})\overset{g}{\rightarrow }E_{3}^{\ast
,\ast }(G/\mathbb{Z}_{q})_{\left\langle \varpi \right\rangle }\rightarrow 0$
\end{enumerate}
\noindent the proof of Theorem 1.3 is valid to show the following result. By
Lemma 3.2 the group $E_{3}^{0,1}(\left[ G\times S^{1}\right] /\mathbb{Z
_{q}) $ has an element that corresponds to the class $\xi _{1}$ defined by
(1.6), which we denote still by $\xi _{1}$.
\bigskip
\noindent \textbf{Theorem\textbf{\ }3.9.} \textsl{The induced map }$C^{\ast
} $ \textsl{fits in} \textsl{the exact sequence}
\begin{enumerate}
\item[(3.13)] $0\rightarrow E_{3}^{\ast ,\ast }(G/\mathbb{Z
_{q})_{\left\langle \varpi \right\rangle }\overset{C^{\ast }}{\rightarrow
E_{3}^{\ast ,\ast }([G\times S^{1}]/\mathbb{Z}_{q})\overset{\overline{\theta
}}{\rightarrow }E_{3}^{\ast ,\ast }(G/\mathbb{Z}_{q})\overset{\varpi }
\rightarrow }\left\langle \varpi \right\rangle \rightarrow 0$
\end{enumerate}
\noindent \textsl{where}
\textsl{i)} $\overline{\theta }(\xi _{1})=q\in E_{3}^{0,0}(G/\mathbb{Z}_{q})
\textsl{;}
\textsl{ii)} $\overline{\theta }(x\cup C^{\ast }(y))=\overline{\theta
(x)\cup y$\textsl{,} $x\in E_{3}^{\ast ,\ast }(\left[ G\times S^{1}\right]
\mathbb{Z}_{q})$\textsl{,} $y\in E_{3}^{\ast ,\ast }(G/\mathbb{Z}_{q})
\textsl{,}
\textsl{iii)} \textsl{the class} $\varpi $ \textsl{satisfies }$\pi ^{\ast
}(\varpi )=\omega $ \textsl{(see (3.3)).}
\textsl{In addition, if} \textsl{the map }$g$\textsl{\ admits a split
homomorphism }$j:E_{3}^{\ast ,\ast }(G/\mathbb{Z}_{q})_{\left\langle \varpi
\right\rangle }$ $\rightarrow $ $E_{3}^{\ast ,\ast }(G/\mathbb{Z}_{q})
\textsl{, then the map }
\begin{quote}
$h:J(\varpi )\otimes E_{3}^{\ast ,\ast }(G/\mathbb{Z}_{q})_{\left\langle
\varpi \right\rangle }\rightarrow E_{3}^{\ast ,\ast }(G/\mathbb{Z}_{q})$
\end{quote}
\noindent \textsl{by} $h(\varpi ^{r}\otimes x)=\varpi ^{r}\cup j(x)$ \textsl
induces an isomorphism of }$J(\varpi )$\textsl{--modules}
\begin{enumerate}
\item[(3.14)] $E_{3}^{\ast ,\ast }(G/\mathbb{Z}_{q})\cong \frac{J(\varpi
)\otimes E_{3}^{\ast ,\ast }(G/\mathbb{Z}_{q})_{\left\langle \varpi
\right\rangle }}{\left\langle \varpi \cdot \func{Im}\overline{\theta
\right\rangle }$\textsl{.}$\square $
\end{enumerate}
\noindent \textbf{Proof. }It suffices to show the relations i), ii) and iii)
\textbf{\ }By the choice of the class $\xi _{1}\in E_{3}^{0,1}(\left[
G\times S^{1}\right] /\mathbb{Z}_{q})$ and by the following commutative
diagram
\begin{quote}
\begin{tabular}{lll}
$E_{3}^{0,1}(\left[ G\times S^{1}\right] /\mathbb{Z}_{q})$ & $\overset
\overline{\theta }}{\rightarrow }$ & $E_{3}^{0,0}(G/\mathbb{Z}_{q})$ \\
$\quad \parallel $ & & $\quad \parallel $ \\
$H^{1}(\left[ G\times S^{1}\right] /\mathbb{Z}_{q})$ & $\overset{\theta }
\rightarrow }$ & $H^{0}(G/\mathbb{Z}_{q})
\end{tabular
,
\end{quote}
\noindent property i) corresponds to i) of Theorem 1.3, while ii) comes
directly from the formula (3.10). Finally, the relation iii) is shown by the
commutative diagram induced by the map $\pi ^{\ast }$ in (3.3):
\begin{quote}
\begin{tabular}{lll}
$E_{3}^{0,0}(G/\mathbb{Z}_{q})$ & $\overset{\cup \varpi }{\rightarrow }$ &
E_{3}^{2,0}(G/\mathbb{Z}_{q})$ \\
$\quad \parallel $ & & $\pi ^{\ast }\quad \downarrow $ \\
$H^{0}(G/\mathbb{Z}_{q})$ & $\overset{\cup \omega }{\rightarrow }$ &
H^{2}(G/\mathbb{Z}_{q})
\end{tabular
.$\square $
\end{quote}
The exact sequence (3.13) can be seen to be a refinement of the sequence
(1.8). In addition, the maps $\pi ^{\ast }$ and $\kappa $ in (3.3) and (3.4)
build up the obvious commutative diagram relating the operator $\theta $ in
(1.8) with the map $\overline{\theta }$ in (3.13)
\begin{enumerate}
\item[(3.15)]
\begin{tabular}{lll}
$E_{3}^{2r,1}(\left[ G\times S^{1}\right] /\mathbb{Z}_{q})$ & $\overset
\overline{\theta }}{\rightarrow }$ & $E_{3}^{2r,0}(G/\mathbb{Z}_{q})$ \\
$\qquad \kappa \quad \downarrow $ & & $\pi ^{\ast }\downarrow $ \\
$H^{2r+1}(G\times S^{1})$ & $\overset{\theta }{\rightarrow }$ & $H^{2r}(G
\mathbb{Z}_{q})
\end{tabular
.
\end{enumerate}
\noindent Moreover, the map $\overline{\theta }$ (hence $\theta $) admits a
simple formula we come to describe.
For\ a polynomial $P\in \left\langle \func{Im}\widetilde{\tau ^{\prime }
\right\rangle $\textsl{\ }we set $P_{0}=P\mid _{\widetilde{\tau
(t_{1})=\cdots =\widetilde{\tau }(t_{n})=0}$. Then $P-P_{0}\in \left\langle
\func{Im}\widetilde{\tau }\right\rangle $ and $P_{0}$ is divisible by
\varpi =\widetilde{\tau ^{\prime }}(t_{0})$. This enables us to define the
\textsl{derivation} $\partial P/\partial \varpi $ of $P$ with respect to
\varpi $ by the formula
\begin{enumerate}
\item[(3.16)] $\partial P/\partial \varpi :=P_{0}/\varpi $,
\end{enumerate}
\noindent and to get an expansion of $P$ in the form (note that $\widetilde
\tau ^{\prime }}(t_{i})=\widetilde{\tau }(t_{i})$, $i\leq n$, by b))
\begin{quote}
$P=p_{1}\cdot \widetilde{\tau ^{\prime }}(t_{1})+\cdots +$ $p_{n}\cdot
\widetilde{\tau ^{\prime }}(t_{n})+\partial P/\partial \varpi \cdot
\widetilde{\tau ^{\prime }}(t_{0})$.
\end{quote}
\noindent In term of Lemma 3.3 for a polynomial $P\in \ker f\cap
\left\langle \func{Im}\widetilde{\tau ^{\prime }}\right\rangle $ we have
\begin{quote}
$\varphi (P)=\left[ f(p_{1})\otimes t_{1}+\cdots +f(p_{n})\otimes
t_{n}+f(\partial P/\partial \varpi )\otimes t_{0}\right] $.
\end{quote}
\noindent The diagram (3.15), together with the formula (3.10), concludes
that
\bigskip
\noindent \textbf{Theorem 3.10.} \textsl{The map} $\overline{\theta }$
\textsl{in (3.13) (resp. the map} $\theta $ \textsl{in (1.8))} \textsl
satisfies that}
\begin{enumerate}
\item[(3.17)] $\overline{\theta }(\varphi (P))=f(\partial P/\partial \varpi
) $ \textsl{(resp.} $\theta (\kappa \circ \varphi (P))=\pi ^{\ast
}f(\partial P/\partial \varpi )$\textsl{),}
\end{enumerate}
\noindent \textsl{where} $P\in \ker f\cap \left\langle \func{Im}\widetilde
\tau ^{\prime }}\right\rangle $, $P_{0}=P\mid _{\widetilde{\tau
(t_{1})=\cdots =\widetilde{\tau }(t_{n})=0}$\textsl{.}$\square $
\bigskip
Let $P\in \ker f\cap \left\langle \func{Im}\widetilde{\tau ^{\prime }
\right\rangle $ be a polynomial with\textsl{\ }$\overline{\theta }(\varphi
(P))=0$. By the exact sequence (3.13) there exists a $1$--form $\eta \in
E_{3}^{\ast ,1}(G/\mathbb{Z}_{q})$ satisfying $C^{\ast }(\eta )=\varphi (P)
. The proof of the next result indicates an algorithm to construct from $P$
a characteristic polynomial $P^{\prime }\in \ker f\cap \left\langle \func{Im
\widetilde{\tau }\right\rangle $ for such a class $\eta $.
\bigskip
\noindent \textbf{Lemma 3.11. }\textsl{For a polynomial }$P\in \ker f\cap
\left\langle \func{Im}\widetilde{\tau ^{\prime }}\right\rangle $ \textsl
with\ }$\overline{\theta }(\varphi (P))=0$\textsl{,} \textsl{there exists a
polynomial }$P^{\prime }\in \ker f\cap \left\langle \func{Im}\widetilde{\tau
}\right\rangle $ \textsl{such that }$C^{\ast }\varphi (P^{\prime })=\varphi
(P)$.
\bigskip
\noindent \textbf{Proof.} With $\overline{\theta }(\varphi (P))=0$ we have
by the exact sequence (3.13) that $d_{2}(\gamma )=f(\partial P/\partial
\varpi )$ for some $\gamma \in E_{2}^{\ast ,1}(G/\mathbb{Z}_{q})$. We can
assume further that $\gamma =\widetilde{H}$ for some $H=h_{1}\cdot
\widetilde{\tau }(t_{1})+\cdots +h_{n}\cdot \widetilde{\tau }(t_{n})\in
\left\langle \func{Im}\widetilde{\tau }\right\rangle $. The desired
polynomial $P^{\prime }$ is given by $P^{\prime }:=P+(H-\partial P/\partial
\varpi )\cdot \varpi $.
Indeed, the obvious relation $H-\partial P/\partial \varpi \in \ker f$
implies that
\begin{quote}
$(H-\partial P/\partial \varpi )\cdot \varpi \in \left\langle \func{Im
\widetilde{\tau ^{\prime }}\right\rangle \cap \ker f$.
\end{quote}
\noindent Consequently, $P^{\prime }\in \left\langle \func{Im}\widetilde
\tau }\right\rangle \cap \ker f$. The relation $C^{\ast }(\varphi (P^{\prime
}))=\varphi (P)$ on $E_{3}^{\ast ,1}([G\times $ $S^{1}]/\mathbb{Z}_{q})$ is
verified by the following calculation in $E_{2}^{\ast ,1}(\left[ G\times
S^{1}\right] /\mathbb{Z}_{q})$
\begin{quote}
$d_{2}(\dsum\limits_{1\leq i\leq n}f(h_{i})\otimes t_{i}t_{0})=-f(\partial
P/\partial \varpi )\otimes t_{0}+\dsum\limits_{1\leq i\leq n}f(h_{i})\varpi
\otimes t_{i}$
$=\widetilde{P^{\prime }}-\widetilde{P}$.$\square $
\end{quote}
\section{The cohomology of adjoint Lie groups}
A Lie group $G$ is called \textsl{adjoint} if its center subgroup $\mathcal{
}(G)$ is trivial. In particular, for any Lie group $G$ the quotient group
PG:=G/\mathcal{Z}(G)$ is adjoint. Granted with the constructions and
formulae developed in Section 3 we compute in this section the cohomologies
of the adjoint Lie groups $PG$ for $G=SU(n),Sp(n),E_{6},E_{7}$. In these
cases the quotient maps $c:G\rightarrow PG$ are cyclic. The corresponding
circle bundle over $PG$ is denoted by
\begin{quote}
$C:\left[ G\times S^{1}\right] /\mathbb{Z}_{q}\cong G\times S^{1}\rightarrow
PG$, $q=\left\vert \mathcal{Z}(G)\right\vert $,
\end{quote}
\noindent where the diffeomorphism $\cong $ follows from Theorem 1.2.
Briefly, the computation is carried out by three steps. Starting from the
formula (2.13) of the ring $H^{\ast }(G/T)$ we obtain firstly the subgroups
\func{Im}\pi ^{\ast }$ and $\func{Im}\kappa $. The exact sequence (3.13) is
then applied to formulate the additive cohomology $H^{\ast }(PG)$ by $\func
Im}\pi ^{\ast }$ and $\func{Im}\kappa $. Finally, the structure of $H^{\ast
}(PG)$ as a ring is determined by expressing the squares $x^{2}$ with $x\in
\func{Im}\kappa $ as elements of $\func{Im}\pi ^{\ast }$, see \cite[Lemma 2.
]{DZ2}.
With the group $G$ being $1$--connected the cohomologies $H^{\ast }(G
\mathbb{F}_{p})$ are known \cite{DZ2}. The following result allows us to
exclude the cohomology $H^{\ast }(PG;\mathbb{F}_{p})$ with $(p,q)=1$ from
further consideration.
\bigskip
\noindent \textbf{Theorem 4.1.} \textsl{If }$(p,q)=1$\textsl{\ the map} $C$
\textsl{induces a ring isomorphism }
\begin{quote}
$C^{\ast }:H^{\ast }(PG;\mathbb{F}_{p})\cong H^{\ast }(G;\mathbb{F}_{p})$.
\end{quote}
\noindent \textbf{Proof. }With\textbf{\ }$p$ co--prime to $q$ one has
\omega \equiv 0\func{mod}p$. Therefore the exact sequence (1.7) becomes
\begin{quote}
$0\rightarrow H^{\ast }(PG;\mathbb{F}_{p})\overset{C^{\ast }}{\rightarrow
H^{\ast }(G\times S^{1};\mathbb{F}_{p})\overset{\theta }{\rightarrow
H^{\ast }(PG;\mathbb{F}_{p})\rightarrow 0$.
\end{quote}
\noindent Moreover, the relation $\theta (\xi _{1})=1$ by i) of Theorem 1.3
implies that, with respect to the decomposition $H^{\ast }(G;\mathbb{F
_{p})\oplus \xi _{1}\cdot H^{\ast }(G;\mathbb{F}_{p})$ on $H^{\ast }(G\times
S^{1};\mathbb{F}_{p})$ the map $C^{\ast }$ carries $H^{\ast }(PG;\mathbb{F
_{p})$ injectively into the first summand $H^{\ast }(G;\mathbb{F}_{p})$,
while by ii) of Theorem 1.3 the map $\theta $ maps the second summand $\xi
_{1}\cdot H^{\ast }(G;\mathbb{F}_{p})$ surjectively onto $H^{\ast }(PG
\mathbb{F}_{p})$. This establishes the isomorphism.$\square $
\subsection{The map $C^{\ast }:E_{3}^{\ast ,0}(G/\mathbb{Z}_{q})$
\rightarrow E_{3}^{\ast ,0}(G\times S^{1})$ in (3.11)}
We begin by taking integers as coefficients for cohomology. Since the groups
$G$ are $1$--connected $TorH^{2}(G\times S^{1})=0$ by Theorem 1.2.
Therefore, the transgression $\tau ^{\prime }$ in $\pi ^{\prime }$ (see
(3.8)) is surjective by (2.2). One gets from Theorem 5.1, as well the
formula $E_{3}^{\ast ,0}(G\times S^{1})=H^{\ast }(G/T)\mid _{\omega
_{1}=\cdots =\omega _{n}=0}$by Lemma 3.1, that
\begin{enumerate}
\item[(4.1)]
\begin{tabular}{l}
$E_{3}^{\ast ,0}(SU(n)\times S^{{\small 1}})=E_{3}^{\ast ,0}(Sp(n)\times
S^{1})=\mathbb{Z}$; \\
$E_{3}^{\ast ,0}(E_{6}\times S^{1})=\frac{\mathbb{Z}[x_{6},x_{8}]}
\left\langle 2x_{6},3x_{8},x_{6}^{2},x_{8}^{3}\right\rangle }$; \\
$E_{3}^{\ast ,0}(E_{7}\times S^{1})=\frac{\mathbb{Z
[x_{6},x_{8},x_{10},x_{18}]}{\left\langle 2x_{6},3x_{8},2x_{10},2{x_{18},
x_{6}^{2},x_{8}^{3},x_{10}^{2},x_{18}^{2}\right\rangle }$
\end{tabular}
\end{enumerate}
\noindent where $x_{i}$'s are the special Schubert classes on $E_{n}/T$,
n=6,7$, defined by (5.1).
Similarly, for the groups $PG$ take a set $\Omega =\{\phi _{1},\cdots ,\phi
_{m}\}$ of fundamental dominant weights as a basis for the unit lattice
\Lambda _{e}$ of $PG$, and let $\{t_{1},\cdots ,t_{m}\}$ be the
corresponding basis on the group $H^{1}(T^{\prime })$ (see in (3.8)), where
m=n-1,n,6$ or $7$ in accordance to $G=SU(n),Sp(n),E_{6},E_{7}$. By iii) of
Lemma 2.2 the matrix $C(\Omega )$ expressing the basis $\Delta $\ of the
root lattice $\Lambda _{r}$ by $\Omega $ is the Cartan matrix of $G$.
Granted with the presentation of the rings $H^{\ast }(G/T)$ in Theorem 5.1,
as well as the results of Lemma 5.2, the formula $E_{3}^{\ast
,0}(PG)=H^{\ast }(G/T)\mid _{\tau (t_{1})=\cdots =\tau (t_{m})=0}$by Lemma
3.1 yields that
\begin{enumerate}
\item[(4.2)]
\begin{tabular}{l}
$E_{3}^{\ast ,0}(PSU(n))=\frac{\mathbb{Z}[\omega _{1}]}{\left\langle
b_{n,r}\omega _{1}^{r},\text{ }1\leq r\leq n\right\rangle }$ with
b_{n,r}=g.c.d.\{\binom{n}{1},\cdots ,\binom{n}{r}\}$; \\
$E_{3}^{\ast ,0}(PSp(n))=\frac{\mathbb{Z}[\omega _{1}]}{\left\langle 2\omega
_{1},\omega _{1}^{2^{r+1}}\right\rangle }$, $n=2^{r}(2s+1)$; \\
$E_{3}^{\ast ,0}(PE_{6})=\frac{\mathbb{Z}[\omega _{1},x_{3}^{\prime },x_{4}
}{\left\langle 3\omega _{1},2x_{3}^{\prime },3x_{4},x_{3}^{\prime 2},\omega
_{1}^{9},x_{4}^{3}\right\rangle }$, $x_{3}^{\prime }=x_{3}+\omega _{1}^{3}$;
\\
$E_{3}^{\ast ,0}(PE_{7})=\frac{\mathbb{Z}[\omega
_{2},x_{3},x_{4},x_{6},x_{9}]}{\left\langle 2\omega _{2},\omega
_{2}^{2},2x_{3},3x_{4},2x_{5},2{x_{9},
x_{3}^{2},x_{4}^{3},x_{5}^{2},x_{9}^{2}\right\rangle }$
\end{tabular}
\end{enumerate}
\noindent where $\binom{n}{r}:=\frac{n!}{r!(n-r)!}$. Inputting (4.1) and
(4.2) into the section
\begin{quote}
$E_{3}^{\ast ,0}(PG)\overset{\varpi }{\rightarrow }E_{3}^{\ast ,0}(PG
\overset{C^{\ast }}{\rightarrow }E_{3}^{\ast ,0}(G\times S^{1})\rightarrow 0$
\end{quote}
\noindent of the exact sequence (3.11) one obtains that
\bigskip
\noindent \textbf{Lemma 4.2.} \textsl{In the order of} $G=SU(n),Sp(n),E_{6}$
\textsl{and} $E_{7}$\textsl{\ one has}
\begin{quote}
\textsl{i)} $J(\varpi )=\frac{\mathbb{Z}[\varpi ]}{\left\langle
b_{n,r}\varpi ^{r},\text{ }1\leq r\leq n\right\rangle },\frac{\mathbb{Z
[\varpi ]}{\left\langle 2\varpi ,\varpi ^{2^{r+1}}\right\rangle },\frac
\mathbb{Z}[\varpi ]}{\left\langle 3\varpi ,\varpi ^{9}\right\rangle },\frac
\mathbb{Z}[\varpi ]}{\left\langle 2\varpi ,\varpi ^{2}\right\rangle }
\textsl{;}
\textsl{ii) the map }$C^{\ast }:$\textsl{\ }$E_{3}^{\ast ,0}(PG)$
\rightarrow E_{3}^{\ast ,0}(G\times S^{1})$ \textsl{is given by }
$\qquad C^{\ast }(x_{s})=x_{s}$\textsl{, }$C^{\ast }(x_{3}^{\prime })=x_{3}
\textsl{;} $C^{\ast }(\varpi )=0$\textsl{.}
\end{quote}
\noindent \textsl{where }$\varpi =\omega _{1}$ \textsl{for}
G=SU(n),Sp(n),E_{6}\QTR{sl}{;}$ $\varpi =\omega _{2}\QTR{sl}{\ }$\textsl{for
}$G=E_{7}.\square $
\bigskip
Since $H^{\ast }(G/T)$ is torsion free $E_{3}^{\ast ,0}(X;\mathbb{F}_{p})$
=E_{3}^{\ast ,0}(X)\otimes \mathbb{F}_{p}$ for both $X=G/\mathbb{Z}_{q}$ and
$G\times S^{1}$. Let $J_{p}(\varpi )\subset E_{3}^{\ast ,0}(PG;\mathbb{F
_{p})$ be the subring generated by $\varpi $ and set $E_{3}^{\ast ,0}(PG
\mathbb{F}_{p})_{\left\langle \varpi \right\rangle }=E_{3}^{\ast ,0}(PG
\mathbb{F}_{p})\mid _{\varpi =0}$. Lemma 4.2 implies that
\bigskip
\noindent \textbf{Lemma 4.3.} \textsl{In the order of }$(G,p)=(SU(n),p)$
\textsl{with }$n=p^{r}n^{\prime }$\textsl{\ and }$(p,n\prime )=1$\textsl{, }
(Sp(n),2)$\textsl{\ with }$n=2^{r}(2d+1)$\textsl{, }$(E_{6},3)$\textsl{\ and
}$(E_{7},2)$\textsl{, one has}
\begin{quote}
\textsl{i)} $J_{p}(\varpi )=\frac{\mathbb{F}_{p}[\varpi ]}{\left\langle
\varpi ^{h(G)}\right\rangle }$ \textsl{with }$h(G)=p^{r},2^{r+1}$\textsl{, }
9$\textsl{, }$2$\textsl{;}
\textsl{ii) }$E_{3}^{\ast ,0}(PG;\mathbb{F}_{p})_{\left\langle \varpi
\right\rangle }=\mathbb{F}_{p},\mathbb{F}_{2},\frac{\mathbb{F}_{3}[x_{4}]}
\left\langle x_{4}^{3}\right\rangle },\frac{\mathbb{F}_{2}[x_{3},x_{5},x_{9}
}{\left\langle x_{3}^{2},x_{5}^{2},x_{9}^{2}\right\rangle }$\textsl{;}
\textsl{iii) }$E_{3}^{\ast ,0}(PG;\mathbb{F}_{p})=J_{p}(\varpi )\otimes
E_{3}^{\ast ,0}(PG;\mathbb{F}_{p})_{\left\langle \varpi \right\rangle }$,
\textsl{iv)} \textsl{the map }$C^{\ast }$ \textsl{annihilates }$\varpi
\textsl{\ and carries} \textsl{the factor} $1\otimes E_{3}^{\ast ,0}(PG
\mathbb{F}_{p})_{\left\langle \varpi \right\rangle }$ \textsl{in iii)}
\textsl{isomorphically onto} the \textsl{ring }$E_{3}^{\ast ,0}(G\times
S^{1};\mathbb{F}_{p})$\textsl{.}$\square $
\end{quote}
\subsection{The ring $H^{\ast }(PG;\mathbb{F}_{p})$}
By Theorem 4.1 we can assume that $(G,p)=(SU(n),p)$ with $p\mid n$;
(Sp(n),2)$; $(E_{6},3)$; $(E_{7},2)$. In view of the set $S_{p}(G)$ of
primary characteristic polynomials of $G$ over $\mathbb{F}_{p}$ presented in
Table 5.1 (see also ii) of Example 3.7) one obtains the degree set $D(G,p)$
of the polynomials in $S_{p}(G)$ as that tabulated below:
\begin{center}
\textbf{Table 4.1.} The degree set of the primary characteristic polynomials
over $\mathbb{F}_{p}$
\begin{tabular}{l|l|l|l|l}
\hline\hline
$(G,p)$ & $(SU(n),p)$ & $(Spin(n),2)$ & $(E_{6},3)$ & $(E_{7},2)$ \\ \hline
$D(G,p)$ & $\{2,3,\cdots ,n\}$ & $\{2,4,\cdots ,2n\}$ & $\{2,4,5,6,8,9\}$ &
\{2,3,5,8,9,12,14\}$ \\ \hline\hline
\end{tabular
.
\end{center}
For each $s\in D(G,p)$ let $\xi _{2s-1}:=\varphi _{p}(P)\in E_{3}^{\ast
,1}(G\times S^{1},\mathbb{F}_{p})$, where $P\in S_{p}(G)$ with $\deg P=s$.
With the groups $G$ being $1$--connected one has by \cite[Theorem 5.4]{DZ3}
the ring isomorphism
\begin{quote}
$E_{3}^{\ast ,\ast }(G\times S^{1},\mathbb{F}_{p})=E_{3}^{\ast ,0}(G\times
S^{1},\mathbb{F}_{p})\otimes \Lambda (\xi _{1},\xi _{2s-1})_{s\in D(G,p)}$,
\end{quote}
\noindent where $\xi _{1}\in E_{3}^{0,1}$\ is the class specified in Theorem
3.9. Let $D(PG,p)$ be the complement of the number $h(G)$ (see i) of Lemma
4.3) in $D(G,p)$, put $B=E_{3}^{\ast ,0}(G\times S^{1},\mathbb{F
_{p})\otimes \Lambda (\xi _{1},\xi _{2s-1})_{s\in D(PG,p)}$ and rewritten
\begin{enumerate}
\item[(4.3)] $E_{3}^{\ast ,\ast }(G\times S^{1},\mathbb{F}_{p})=B\oplus \xi
_{2h(G)-1}\cdot B$ .
\end{enumerate}
\noindent Then the exact sequence (3.13) takes the following useful form
\begin{enumerate}
\item[(4.4)] $0\rightarrow E_{3}^{\ast ,\ast }(PG;\mathbb{F
_{p})_{\left\langle \varpi \right\rangle }\overset{C^{\ast }}{\rightarrow
B\oplus \xi _{2h(G)-1}\cdot B\overset{\overline{\theta }}{\rightarrow
E_{3}^{\ast ,\ast }(PG;\mathbb{F}_{p})\overset{\varpi }{\rightarrow
\left\langle \varpi \right\rangle \rightarrow 0$.
\end{enumerate}
With $p\mid q$ one has $\overline{\theta }(\xi _{1})=0$ by i) of Theorem
3.9. By (4.4) there is a unique class $\iota ^{\prime }\in E_{3}^{0,1}(G
\mathbb{Z}_{q};\mathbb{F}_{p})=\mathbb{F}_{p}$ such that
\begin{quote}
$C^{\ast }(\iota ^{\prime })=\xi _{1}$ (with $\kappa (\iota ^{\prime })=$
\iota $, $\widehat{\beta }_{p}(\iota ^{\prime })=\varpi $ by the diagram
(3.5)).
\end{quote}
\noindent Furthermore, with the set $S_{p}(G)$ of characteristic polynomials
for $1$--forms $\xi _{2s-1}$ being presented in Table 5.1, the formula
(3.17) is applicable to evaluate $\overline{\theta }(\xi _{2s-1})$, $s\in
D(G,p)$. The results recorded in Table 5.2 yield that
\begin{enumerate}
\item[(4.5)] $\overline{\theta }(\xi _{2s-1})=0$ \textsl{if} $s\in D(PG,p
\QTR{sl}{,}$ $\omega ^{h(G)-1}$ \textsl{if} $s=h(G)$.
\end{enumerate}
\noindent With $\overline{\theta }(\xi _{2s-1})=0$ for $s\in D(PG,p)$ Lemma
3.11 assures us a polynomial $P^{\prime }\in \left\langle \func{Im
\widetilde{\tau }\right\rangle _{p}\cap \ker f_{p}$ with $\deg P^{\prime }=s$
so that class $\zeta _{2s-1}=\varphi _{p}(P^{\prime })$ satisfies
\begin{quote}
$C^{\ast }(\zeta _{2s-1})=\xi _{2s-1}$.
\end{quote}
\noindent A set of such polynomials $P^{\prime }$ so obtained, denoted by
S_{p}(PG)$, are presented in Table 5.3. Taking iv) of Lemma 4.3 into
consideration the exactness of the sequence (4.4) forces the isomorphisms
\begin{quote}
$E_{3}^{\ast ,\ast }(PG;\mathbb{F}_{p})_{\left\langle \omega \right\rangle
}\cong E_{3}^{\ast ,0}(PG;\mathbb{F}_{p})_{\left\langle \varpi \right\rangle
}\otimes \Lambda (\iota ^{\prime },\zeta _{2s-1})_{s\in D(PG,p)}$,
$\xi _{2h(G)-1}\cdot B\overset{\overline{\theta }}{\underset{\cong }
\rightarrow }}\varpi ^{h(G)-1}\cdot E_{3}^{\ast ,\ast }(PG;\mathbb{F
_{p})_{\left\langle \varpi \right\rangle }$ (by ii) of Theorem 3.9)
\end{quote}
\noindent which imply that $\func{Im}\overline{\theta }=\left\langle
\overline{\omega }^{h(G)-1}\right\rangle $. With the field $\mathbb{F}_{p}$
as coefficient the exact sequence (3.12) is splitable. The formula (3.14)
then yields the presentation
\begin{enumerate}
\item[(4.6)] $E_{3}^{\ast ,\ast }(PG;\mathbb{F}_{p})=E_{3}^{\ast ,0}(PG
\mathbb{F}_{p})\otimes \Lambda (\iota ^{\prime },\zeta _{2s-1})_{s\in
D(PG,p)}$.
\end{enumerate}
By (4.6) the ring $E_{3}^{\ast ,\ast }(PG;\mathbb{F}_{p})$ is generated by
E_{3}^{\ast ,0}$ and $E_{3}^{\ast ,1}$, hence the differentials $d_{r}$ act
trivially on $E_{r}^{\ast ,\ast }(PG;\mathbb{F}_{p})$, $r\geq 4$. We get
E_{3}^{\ast ,\ast }(PG;\mathbb{F}_{p})=E_{\infty }^{\ast ,\ast }(PG;\mathbb{
}_{p})$. In particular, the maps $\pi ^{\ast }$ and $\kappa $ in (3.3) and
(3.4) are all monomorphisms. Combining this with the isomorphism of $\mathbb
F}_{p}$--spaces
\begin{quote}
$E_{\infty }^{\ast ,\ast }(PG;\mathbb{F}_{p})=H^{\ast }(PG;\mathbb{F}_{p})$
\end{quote}
\noindent we get from (4.6) the following additive presentation of the
cohomology $H^{\ast }(PG;\mathbb{F}_{p})$
\begin{enumerate}
\item[(4.7)] $H^{\ast }(PG;\mathbb{F}_{p})=\pi ^{\ast }E_{3}^{\ast ,0}(PG
\mathbb{F}_{p})\otimes \Delta (\iota ,\zeta _{2s-1})_{s\in D(PG,p)}$,
\end{enumerate}
\noindent where for simplicity the notion $\zeta _{2s-1}$ is reserved for
the cohomology classes $\kappa (\zeta _{2s-1})\in H^{\ast }(G;\mathbb{F
_{p}) $, and where one needs to replace exterior ring $\Lambda (\iota
^{\prime },\zeta _{2s-1})$ by the $\mathbb{F}_{p}$--module $\Delta (\iota
,\zeta _{2s-1})$, since the properties $\iota ^{\prime 2},\zeta
_{2s-1}^{2}=0 $ on $E_{\infty }^{\ast ,\ast }(PG;\mathbb{F}_{p})$ may not
survive to $H^{\ast }(G;\mathbb{F}_{p})$, see \cite[Lemma 2.8]{DZ2}.
Since $\zeta _{2s-1}=\kappa \circ \varphi _{p}(P)$ with $P\in S_{p}(PG)$ and
$\deg P=s$, the formulae in Lemmas 3.7 and 3.8 is functional to compute
\beta _{p}(\zeta _{2s-1})$ and $Sq^{2r}(\zeta _{2s-1})$ in term of $P$. The
calculation justifying the following results can be found in Section 5.
\bigskip
\noindent \textbf{Lemma 4.4. }\textsl{With respect to the presentation (4.7)
one has}
\begin{quote}
\textsl{a) for }$(G,p)=(SU(n),p)$\textsl{\ with }$n=p^{r}n^{\prime }$,
(n\prime ,p)=1$
$\qquad \beta _{p}(\zeta _{2s-1})=-p^{r-t-1}\omega ^{p^{t}}$ \textsl{if}
s=p^{t}$ \textsl{with} $t<r$\textsl{,} $0$ \textsl{otherwise}
\qquad \textsl{(resp.} $Sq^{2s-2}\zeta _{2s-1}=\zeta _{4s-3}$ \textsl{for }
2s-1\leq 2^{r-1}$\textsl{);}
\textsl{b) for }$(G,p)=(Sp(n),2)$\textsl{\ with }$n=2^{r}(2b+1)$\textsl{:}
$\qquad \beta _{2}(\zeta _{4s-1})=\omega ^{2^{r}}$ \textsl{if} $s=2^{r-1}
\textsl{,} $0$ \textsl{if} $s\neq 2^{r-1}$
\qquad \textsl{(resp. }$Sq^{4s-2}\zeta _{4s-1}=\zeta _{8s-3}$\textsl{\ for }
4s-1\leq 2^{r}$\textsl{);}
\textsl{c) for }$(G,p)=(E_{6},3)$\textsl{\ and in the order of }$s=2,4,5,6,8$
$\qquad \beta _{3}(\zeta _{2s-1})=0,-x_{4},0,0,-x_{4}^{2}$\textsl{;}
\textsl{d) for }$(G,p)=(E_{7},2)$\textsl{\ and in the order of }
s=3,5,8,9,12,14$
$\qquad \beta _{2}(\zeta
_{2s-1})=x_{3},x_{5},x_{3}x_{5},x_{9},x_{3}x_{9},x_{5}x_{9}$
\qquad \textsl{(resp. }$Sq^{2s-2}\zeta _{2s-1}=\zeta _{9},\zeta
_{17},0,0,0,0 $\textsl{).}$\square $
\end{quote}
Combining (4.7) with Lemma 4.4 we show that
\bigskip
\noindent \textbf{Theorem 4.5.} \textsl{The rings }$H^{\ast }(PG;\mathbb{F
_{p})$ \textsl{has the following presentations}
\begin{enumerate}
\item[i)] $H^{\ast }(PSU(n);\mathbb{F}_{2})=\frac{\mathbb{F}_{2}[\omega ]}
\left\langle \omega ^{2^{r}}\right\rangle }\otimes \Delta (\iota )\otimes
\Lambda _{\mathbb{F}_{2}}(\zeta _{3},\zeta _{5},\cdots ,\widehat{\zeta
_{2^{r+1}-1},\cdots ,\zeta _{2n-1})$\textsl{,}
\textsl{where }$n=2^{r}(2b+1)$,\textsl{\ }$\iota ^{2}=\omega $ \textsl{or }
0 $\textsl{\ in accordance to }$r=1$\textsl{\ or} $r>1$\textsl{;}
\item[ii)] $H^{\ast }(PSU(n);\mathbb{F}_{p})=\frac{\mathbb{F}_{p}[\omega ]}
\left\langle \omega ^{p^{r}}\right\rangle }\otimes \Lambda _{\mathbb{F
_{p}}(\iota ,\zeta _{3},\cdots ,\widehat{\zeta }_{2p^{r}-1},\cdots ,\zeta
_{2n-1})$\textsl{, }
\textsl{where }$p\neq 2$\textsl{, }$n=p^{r}n^{\prime }$\textsl{\ with }
(n^{\prime },p)=1$\textsl{;}
\item[iii)] $H^{\ast }(PSp(n);\mathbb{F}_{2})=\frac{\mathbb{F}_{2}[\omega ]}
\left\langle \omega ^{2^{r+1}}\right\rangle }\otimes \Delta (\iota )\otimes
\Lambda _{\mathbb{F}_{2}}(\zeta _{3},\zeta _{7},\cdots ,\widehat{\zeta
_{2^{r+2}-1},\cdots ,\zeta _{4n-1})$\textsl{, }
\textsl{where }$\iota ^{2}=\omega $\textsl{,} $n=2^{r}(2b+1)$\textsl{;}
\item[iv)] $H^{\ast }(PE_{6};\mathbb{F}_{3})=\frac{\mathbb{F}_{3}[\omega
,x_{4}]}{\left\langle \omega ^{9},x_{4}^{3}\right\rangle }\otimes \Lambda _
\mathbb{F}_{3}}(\iota ,\zeta _{3},\zeta _{7},\zeta _{9},\zeta _{11},\zeta
_{15})$\textsl{;}
\item[v)] $H^{\ast }(PE_{7};\mathbb{F}_{2})=\frac{\mathbb{F}_{2}[\omega
,x_{3},x_{5},x_{9}]}{\left\langle \omega
^{2},x_{3}^{2},x_{5}^{2},x_{9}^{2}\right\rangle }\otimes \Delta (\iota
,\zeta _{5},\zeta _{9})\otimes \Lambda _{\mathbb{F}_{2}}(\zeta _{15},\zeta
_{17},\zeta _{23},\zeta _{27})$\textsl{,}
\textsl{where }$\iota ^{2}=\omega ,\zeta _{5}^{2}=x_{5},\zeta _{9}^{2}=x_{9}
\textsl{.}
\end{enumerate}
\noindent \textbf{Proof. }In the presentations through i) to v) the first
factor is $\func{Im}\pi ^{\ast }\cong E_{3}^{\ast ,0}(PG;\mathbb{F}_{p})$,
see iii) of Lemma 4.3. It remains to justify the expressions of the squares
\iota ^{2},\zeta _{2s-1}^{2}$ as that indicated in the theorem.
The cases ii) and iv) are trivial, as in a characteristic $p\neq 2$ the
square of any odd degree cohomology class is zero. In the remaining cases
i), iii) and v) we have $p=2$. The relations $\iota ^{2}=\omega $ come from
\omega =\beta _{q}(\iota )\in H^{2}(PG)$ with $q=n,2,2$ in accordance to
G=SU(n),Sp(n),E_{7}$. To evaluate $\zeta _{2s-1}^{2}$ with $s\in D(PG,p)$ we
make use of the Steenrod operators $Sq^{2r}$ by which
\begin{quote}
$\zeta _{2s-1}^{2}=\delta _{2}\circ Sq^{2s-2}(\zeta _{2s-1})$ (see \cite{SE
).
\end{quote}
\noindent Results in Lemma 4.4 implies that $\zeta _{2s-1}^{2}=0$\ with the
only exceptions $\zeta _{5}^{2}=x_{5}$, $\zeta _{9}^{2}=x_{9}$ when
(G,p)=(E_{7},2)$. This completes the proof.$\square $
\subsection{The integral cohomology of $PSU(n),PSp(n)$}
The integral cohomology of a space $X$ admits a canonical decomposition
\begin{enumerate}
\item[(4.8)] $H^{\ast }(X)=\mathcal{F}(X)\underset{p}{\oplus }\sigma _{p}(X)$
with $\sigma _{p}(X):=\{x\in H^{\ast }(X)\mid p^{r}x=0,$ $r\geq 1\}$,
\end{enumerate}
\noindent where the summands $\mathcal{F}(X)$ and $\sigma _{p}(X)$ are a
\textsl{free part }and the $p$--\textsl{primary component }of $H^{\ast }(X)
, and where the sum is over all primes $p$. Therefore, the determination of
the cohomology $H^{\ast }(X)$ essentially consists of two tasks:
a) express $\mathcal{F}(X)$ and $\sigma _{p}(X)$ by explicit generators of
the ring $H^{\ast }(X)$;
b) decide the actions $\mathcal{F}(X)\times \sigma _{p}(X)\rightarrow \sigma
_{p}(X)$ of the free part on $\sigma _{p}(X)$.
\noindent Keeping these in mind we compute the integral cohomology $H^{\ast
}(PG)$ for $G=SU(n)$ and $SP(n)$ by applying the exact sequence (1.8) (resp.
(3.13)).
With the groups $G=SU(n)$ and $Sp(n)$ being $1$--connected the integral
cohomologies of the groups $G\times S^{1}$ are well known. Indeed, with
respect to the degree set $D(G)$ of the set $S(G)$ of primary characteristic
polynomials for $G$ over $\mathbb{Z}$ given in Table 4.4 (see also Example
3.6) one has
\begin{enumerate}
\item[(4.9)] $E_{3}^{\ast ,\ast }(G\times S^{1})=\Lambda (\gamma _{1},\gamma
_{2s-1})_{s\in D(G)}$($\cong H^{\ast }(G\times S^{1})$ via $\kappa $ in
(3.4)).
\end{enumerate}
\noindent where $D(SU(n))=\left\{ 2,\cdots ,n\right\} $, $D(Sp(n))=\left\{
4,\cdots ,2n\right\} $, and where $\gamma _{1}:=\xi _{1}$, $\gamma
_{2s-1}=\varphi (P)\in E_{3}^{\ast ,1}(G\times S^{1})$ with $P\in S(G)$ and
\deg P=s$. Moreover, in addition to the relations by i) of Theorem 3.9
\begin{quote}
$\overline{\theta }(\gamma _{1})=n$ or $2$ for $G=SU(n)$ or $Sp(n)$,
\end{quote}
\noindent with $\gamma _{2s-1}=\varphi (P)$ the formula (3.17) is applicable
to evaluate $\overline{\theta }(\gamma _{2s-1})$ in term of $P$. Explicitly,
the computation recorded in Table 5.5 tells that
\begin{enumerate}
\item[(4.10)] $\overline{\theta }(\gamma _{2s-1})=\left\{
\begin{tabular}{l}
$\binom{n}{s}\varpi ^{s-1}$ for $SU(n)$; \\
$0$ if $s\neq 2^{r+1}$, $\varpi ^{2^{r+1}-1}$ if $s=2^{r+1}$, for
Sp(2^{r}(2b+1))$
\end{tabular
\right. $
\end{enumerate}
By \textsl{the prime factorization of an integer} $n\geq 2$ we mean the
unique expression $n=p_{1}^{r_{1}}\cdots p_{t}^{r_{t}}$ with $1<p_{1}<\cdots
<p_{t}$ the set of all prime factors of $n$. In term of this factorization
one defines the partition on the set $\left\{ 2,\cdots ,n\right\} $ by
\begin{quote}
$\left\{ 2,\cdots ,n\right\} =Q_{0}(n)\underset{1\leq i\leq t}{\amalg
Q_{p_{i}}(n)$ with $Q_{p_{i}}(n)=\{p_{i}^{r}\mid 1\leq r\leq r_{s}\}$.
\end{quote}
\noindent \textbf{Lemma 4.6.} \textsl{Assume that} $G=SU(n)$\textsl{\ with }
n=p_{1}^{r_{1}}\cdots p_{t}^{r_{t}}$\textsl{\ (resp. }$G=Sp(n)$\textsl{\
with }$n=2^{r}(2b+1)$\textsl{). For a }$s\in D(G)$ \textsl{let }$a_{s}\in
\mathbb{Z}$\textsl{\ be the order of the class }$\overline{\theta }(\gamma
_{2s-1})\in E_{3}^{\ast ,0}(PG)$\textsl{.} \textsl{Then}
\begin{enumerate}
\item[i)] $a_{s}=p_{i}$ \textsl{or }$1$\textsl{\ for }$s\in Q_{{\small p
_{i}}(n)$\textsl{\ or} $s\in Q_{0}(n)$
\textsl{(resp. }$a_{s}=2$ \textsl{or }$1$\textsl{\ for }$s=2^{{\small r+1}}
\textsl{\ or} $s\neq 2^{{\small r+1}}$\textsl{);}
\item[ii)] \textsl{there exists a class }$\rho _{2s-1}\in E_{3}^{\ast
,1}(PG) $\textsl{\ satisfying }$C^{\ast }(\rho _{2s-1})=a_{s}\gamma _{2s-1}
\textsl{;}
\item[iii)] $\mathcal{F}(PG)=\Lambda (\rho _{2s-1}^{\prime })_{s\in D(G)}
\textsl{, where }$\rho _{2s-1}^{\prime }=\kappa (\rho _{2s-1})\in H^{\ast
}(PG)$\textsl{.}
\end{enumerate}
\noindent \textbf{Proof.} For $SU(n)$ (resp. for $Sp(n)$) the relation i)
comes from the formula (4.10) of $\overline{\theta }(\gamma _{2s-1})$, the
presentation (4.2) of the ring $E_{3}^{\ast ,0}(PSU(n))$ (resp. $E_{3}^{\ast
,0}(PSp(n))$), as well as \cite[Theorem 1.1]{DLin} (see also (5.5)).
Property ii) follows from $\overline{\theta }(a_{s}\gamma _{2s-1})=0$,
together with the exactness of the sequence (3.11).
To show iii) we set for a multi--index $I\subseteq D(G)$ that
\begin{quote}
$a_{I}=\underset{s\in I}{\Pi }a_{s}\in \mathbb{Z}$, $\gamma _{I}=\underset
s\in I}{\Pi }\gamma _{2s-1}\in H^{\ast }(G)$, $\rho _{I}=\underset{s\in I}
\Pi }\rho _{2s-1}^{\prime }\in H^{\ast }(PG)$.
\end{quote}
\noindent For $G=SU(n)$ or $Sp(n)$ the degree of the covering
c:G\rightarrow PG$ is $\deg c=n$ or $2$. On the other hand by (4.9) the
monomial $\gamma _{D(G)}$ is a generator of the top degree cohomology group
H^{m}(G)=\mathbb{Z}$, $m=\dim G$, while the relations $a_{D(G)}=\deg c$,
C^{\ast }(\rho _{D(G)})=a_{D(G)}\cdot \gamma _{D(G)}$ by i) and ii) implies
that the monomial $\rho _{D(G)}$ is a generator of the group $H^{m}(PG)$ $
\mathbb{Z}$. By \cite[Lemma 2.9]{DZ2} the set $\{1,\rho _{I}\mid $
I\subseteq D(G)\}$ of monomials spans a direct summand of $\mathcal{F}(PG)$
with rank $2^{\left\vert D(G)\right\vert }$. It follows then from
\begin{quote}
$\dim (\mathcal{F}(PG)\otimes \mathbb{Q)=}\dim (\mathcal{F}(G)\otimes
\mathbb{Q)=}2^{\left\vert D(G)\right\vert }$
\end{quote}
\noindent that the set $\{1,\rho _{I}\mid $ $I\subseteq D(G)\}$ of monomials
is a basis of $\mathcal{F}(PG)$.
The proof of iii) will be completed once we show that $\rho _{2s-1}^{\prime
2}=0$, $s\in D(G)$. Assume that $n=2^{r}(2b+1)$. Since the square of an odd
degree cohomology class belongs to $\func{Im}\beta _{2}$, and since the
relation $\rho _{2s-1}^{\prime }\in \func{Im}\kappa $ implies that $\rho
_{2s-1}^{2}\in \func{Im}\pi ^{\ast }$ by \cite[Lemma 2.8]{DZ2}, we have
\begin{quote}
$\rho _{2s-1}^{\prime 2}\in \func{Im}[\pi ^{\ast }\circ \widehat{\beta
_{2}:E_{3}^{\ast ,1}(PG;\mathbb{F}_{2})\rightarrow E_{3}^{\ast
,0}(PG)\rightarrow H^{\ast }(PG)]$.
\end{quote}
\noindent On the other hand Lemma 4.3 implies that, if $G=SU(n)$ (resp.
G=Sp(n)$),
\begin{quote}
$\func{Im}\pi ^{\ast }\circ \widehat{\beta }_{2}=\{0,2^{r-t-1}\omega
^{2^{t}}\mid 0\leq t\leq r-1\}$ (resp. $\{0,\omega ^{2^{r}}\}$).
\end{quote}
\noindent One obtains the desired relation $\rho _{2s-1}^{\prime 2}=0$ for
the degree reason.$\square $
\bigskip
To simplify notation we reserve $\rho _{2s-1}$ for $\rho _{2s-1}^{\prime }$.
Substituting the formula (4.9) for $H^{\ast }(G\times S^{1})$ into (1.8)
yields the following exact sequence, in which $H^{\ast }(PG)_{\left\langle
\omega \right\rangle }=\Lambda (\rho _{2s-1})_{s\in D(G)}$ by the relations
ii) and iii) of Lemma 4.6,
\begin{quote}
$0\rightarrow \Lambda (\rho _{2s-1})_{s\in D(G)}\overset{C^{\ast }}
\rightarrow }\Lambda (\gamma _{1},\gamma _{2s-1})_{s\in D(G)}\overset{\theta
}{\rightarrow }H^{\ast }(PG)\overset{\omega }{\rightarrow }\left\langle
\omega \right\rangle \rightarrow 0$.
\end{quote}
\noindent Since the quotient group $H^{\ast }(PG)_{\left\langle \omega
\right\rangle }$ is free the map $g$ in the exact sequence (1.7) has a
splitting homomorphism. Therefore, the formula (3.14) becomes functional to
yield the presentation
\begin{enumerate}
\item[(4.11)] $H^{\ast }(PG)=\frac{J(\omega )\otimes \Lambda (\rho
_{2s-1})_{s\in D(G)}}{\left\langle \omega \cdot \func{Im}\theta
\right\rangle }$, where
\item[(4.12)] $J(\omega )=\left\{
\begin{tabular}{l}
$\frac{\mathbb{Z}[\omega ]}{\left\langle b_{n,r}\omega ^{r},\text{ }1\leq
r\leq n\right\rangle }$ for $G=SU(n)$; \\
$\mathbb{Z}\oplus \frac{\mathbb{Z}[\omega ]^{+}}{\left\langle 2\omega
,\omega ^{2^{r+1}}\right\rangle }$ for $G=Sp(n)$ with $2^{r}(2b+1)
\end{tabular
\right. $ by (4.2).
\end{enumerate}
\noindent \textbf{Theorem 4.7. }\textsl{The integral cohomologies of the
groups }$PSp(n)$\textsl{\ (}$n=2^{r}(2b+1)$\textsl{) and }$PSU(n)$\textsl{\
}$n=p_{1}^{r_{1}}\cdots p_{t}^{r_{t}}$\textsl{) are}
\begin{enumerate}
\item[i)] $H^{\ast }(PSp(n))=\Lambda (\rho _{4s-1})_{s\in \{1,\cdots
,n\}}\oplus \sigma _{2}(PSp(n))$, \textsl{where}
$\sigma _{2}(PSp(n))=\frac{\mathbb{F}_{2}[\omega ]^{+}\otimes \Lambda (\rho
_{3},\rho _{7},\cdots ,\rho _{4n-1})}{\left\langle \omega ^{2^{r+1}},\text{
\omega \cdot \rho _{2^{r+2}-1}\right\rangle }$\textsl{.}
\item[ii)] $H^{\ast }(PSU(n))=\Lambda (\rho _{2s-1})_{s\in \{2,\cdots ,n\}
\underset{1\leq s\leq t}{\oplus }\sigma _{p_{s}}(PSU(n))$\textsl{, where}
$\sigma _{p_{s}}(PSU(n))=\frac{\mathbb{Z}[\omega ]^{+}\otimes \Lambda (\rho
_{2s-1})_{s\in \{2,\cdots ,n\}}}{\left\langle \omega \theta (\gamma
_{I})\mid I\subseteq \{1\}\amalg Q_{p_{s}}(n)\right\rangle }$\textsl{.}
\end{enumerate}
\noindent \textbf{Proof.} For both $G=Sp(n)$ and $SU(n)$ the presentation of
the free part $\mathcal{F}(PG)$ stated in the theorem has been shown by iii)
of Lemma 4.6. It remains to establish the formulae for the ideals $\sigma
_{p}(PG)$.
If $G=Sp(n)$ the formulae (4.11) and (4.12) imply, in addition to $\sigma
_{p}(PSp(n))$ $=0$ when $p\neq 2$, that the map $h$ in Theorem 1.3 restricts
a surjection
\begin{quote}
$h_{2}:\mathbb{Z}[\omega ]^{+}\otimes \Lambda (\rho _{3},\rho _{7},\cdots
,\rho _{4n-1})\rightarrow \sigma _{2}(PSp(n))$
\end{quote}
\noindent with $\ker h_{2}=\left\langle \omega \cdot \func{Im}\theta (\gamma
_{I}),\omega \cdot \func{Im}\theta (\gamma _{1}\gamma _{I})\mid I\subseteq
D(Sp(n))\right\rangle $. By formula (4.10) and the property ii) of Theorem
1.3
\begin{quote}
$\theta (\gamma _{I})=0$ or $\omega ^{2^{r}}\rho _{I\backslash \{2^{r+1}\}}$
if $2^{r+1}\notin I$ or $2^{r+1}\in I$;
$\theta (\gamma _{1}\gamma _{I})=2\rho _{I}$ or $\rho _{I}$ if
2^{r+1}\notin I$ or $2^{r+1}\in I$.
\end{quote}
\noindent Summarizing $\ker h_{2}=\left\langle 2\omega ,\omega
^{2^{r+1}},\omega \cdot \rho _{2^{r+2}-1}\right\rangle $, completing the
proof of i).
For $G=SU(n)$\textsl{\ }one can show that\textsl{\ }the ideal $\ker
h=\left\langle \omega \cdot \func{Im}\theta \right\rangle $ admits the
simplification
\begin{enumerate}
\item[a)] $\ker h=\left\langle \omega \theta (\gamma _{I})\mid I\subseteq
\{1\}\amalg Q_{p_{s}}(n)\text{, }1\leq s\leq t\right\rangle $.
\end{enumerate}
\noindent To show this we note that each multi--index $K\subseteq \{2,\cdots
,n\}$ has the partition
\begin{quote}
$K=K_{0}\underset{1\leq s\leq t}{\sqcup }K_{s}$ with $K_{0}=K\cap Q_{0}(n)$,
$K_{s}=K\cap Q_{p_{s}}(n)$.
\end{quote}
\noindent Let $b_{s}=p_{1}^{\left\vert K_{1}\right\vert }\cdots \widehat
p_{s}^{\left\vert K_{s}\right\vert }}\cdots p_{t}^{\left\vert
K_{t}\right\vert }$ with $\left\vert K_{s}\right\vert $ the cardinality of
K_{s}$. Since the set $\{b_{1},\cdots ,b_{t}\}$ of integers is co--prime
there is a set $\{q_{1},\cdots ,q_{t}\}$ of integers satisfying $\Sigma
q_{s}b_{s}=1$. One obtains a) from the following calculation based on ii) of
Theorem 1.3 and ii) of Lemma 4.6, where $H_{s}$ is the complement of $K_{s}$
in $K$:
\begin{quote}
$\theta (\gamma _{K})=\Sigma q_{s}\theta (b_{s}\gamma _{K})=\Sigma q_{s}\rho
_{H_{s}}\cup \theta (\gamma _{K_{s}})$;
$\theta (\gamma _{1}\gamma _{K})=\Sigma q_{s}\theta (b_{s}\gamma _{1}\gamma
_{K})=\Sigma q_{s}\rho _{H_{s}}\cup \theta (\gamma _{1}\gamma _{K_{s}})$.
\end{quote}
On the other hand, by (4.12) the ring $J(\omega )$ admits the decomposition
\begin{enumerate}
\item[b)] $J(\omega )=\mathbb{Z}\underset{1\leq s\leq t}{\oplus }$
J_{s}(\omega )$ with $J_{s}(\omega )=\frac{\mathbb{Z}[\omega ]^{+}}
\left\langle p_{s}^{r_{s}}\omega ,p_{s}^{r_{s}-1}\omega
^{p_{s}},p_{s}^{r_{s}-2}\omega ^{p_{s}^{2}},\cdots ,\omega
^{p_{s}^{r_{s}}}\right\rangle }$.
\end{enumerate}
\noindent Substituting a) and b) into (4.11) and notice by ii) of Theorem
1.3 that
\begin{quote}
$\theta (\gamma _{I})\in \sigma _{p_{s}}(PSU(n))$ for all $I\subseteq
Q_{p_{s}}(n)$,
\end{quote}
\noindent one gets, in addtion to $\sigma _{p}(PSU(n))$ $=0$ for $p\notin
\{p_{1},\cdots ,p_{t}\}$, the isomorphisms
\begin{enumerate}
\item[c)] $\frac{J_{s}(\omega )\otimes \Lambda (\rho _{2s-1})_{s\in
\{1,\cdots ,n\}}}{\left\langle \omega \theta (\gamma _{I})\mid I\subseteq
\{1\}\amalg Q_{p_{s}}(n)\right\rangle }\cong \sigma _{p_{s}}(PSU(n))$,
1\leq s\leq t$.$\square $
\end{enumerate}
In view the formula c) for the ideal $\sigma _{p_{s}}(PSU(n))$ a complete
description of the ring $H^{\ast }(PSU(n))$ asks for a formula expressing
the classes $\theta (\gamma _{I})$ with $I\subseteq \{1\}\amalg Q_{p_{s}}(n)$
by the generators $\omega $ and $\rho _{2s-1}$ of the ring $H^{\ast
}(PSU(n)) $. We emphasize at this point that presently the classes $\rho
_{2s-1}$ are only determined modulo the ideal $\left\langle \omega
\right\rangle $, while formulae for $\theta (\gamma _{I})$ may vary with
respect to different choices of the classes $\rho _{2s-1}$. With an
appropriate choice of the primary $1$--forms $\rho _{2s-1}$ by their
characteristic polynomials (see formula (5.8)) the following result will be
established in Section 5.4.
\bigskip
\noindent \textbf{Proposition 4.8.} \textsl{If }$n=p^{r}$\textsl{\ the
classes }$\rho _{2p^{s}-1}$\textsl{, }$1\leq s\leq r$\textsl{, may be chosen
so that, for an }$I=\left\{ p^{i_{1}},\cdots ,p^{i_{k}}\right\} \in
\{1\}\sqcup Q_{p}(n)$\textsl{\ with\ }$0\leq i_{1}<\cdots <i_{k}\leq r
\textsl{,}
\begin{enumerate}
\item[i)] \textsl{the class }$\theta (\gamma _{I})\in H^{\ast }(PSU(n))
\textsl{\ is divisible by }$p$\textsl{\ whenever }$i_{k}<r$\textsl{;}
\item[ii)] $\theta (\gamma _{2p^{s}-1})=p^{r-s}$\textsl{\ if }$I=\left\{
p^{s}\right\} $ \textsl{is a singleton;}
\item[iii)] $\theta (\gamma _{I})=(\frac{1}{p}\theta (\gamma _{I^{e}}))\cdot
\rho _{2p^{i_{k}}-1}+(\frac{1}{p}\theta (\gamma _{I^{\partial }}))\cdot
\omega ^{p^{i_{k}}-p^{i_{k}-1}}$
\end{enumerate}
\noindent \textsl{where }$I^{e}=\left\{ p^{i_{1}},\cdots
,p^{i_{k-1}}\right\} $\textsl{, }$I^{\partial }=\left\{ p^{i_{1}},\cdots
,p^{i_{k}-1}\right\} $\textsl{.}$\square $
\bigskip
In view of the formula c) the assumption $n=p^{r}$ in Proposition 4.8 may
not be necessary for the following reason. If $n=p^{r}n^{\prime }$\textsl{\
with $(p,n^{\prime })=1$ then
\begin{quote}
$Q_{p}(n)=Q_{p}(p^{r})$.
\end{quote}
\noindent It indicates that, with respect to the cohomology ring map induced
by the inclusion $PSU(p^{r})\rightarrow PSU(n)$, the set $\left\langle
\omega \theta (\gamma _{I})\mid I\subseteq \{1\}\amalg Q_{p}(n)\right\rangle
$ of relations on $\sigma _{p}(PSU(n))$ are in one to one correspondence
with that on $\sigma _{p}(PSU(p^{r}))$, where the latter are handled by
Proposition 4.8.
\bigskip
\noindent \textbf{Example 4.9.} In Proposition 4.8 we notice that
\begin{quote}
a) if $i_{k}=i_{k-1}+1$ then $\gamma _{I^{\partial }}=0$ by the relation
\gamma _{2r-1}^{2}=0$ on $H^{\ast }(U(n))$;
b) the classes $\theta (\gamma _{I^{e}})$ and $\theta (\gamma _{I^{\partial
}})$ are always divisible by\textsl{\ }$p$ by ii).
\end{quote}
\noindent Therefore, formula iii) gives an effective recurrence to evaluate
\theta (\gamma _{I})$. As examples when $n=2^{3}$ we get that
\begin{quote}
$\theta (\gamma _{\{1,2,4\}})=2\rho _{3}\rho _{7}$;
$\theta (\gamma _{\{1,2,8\}})=2\rho _{3}\rho _{15}+\omega ^{4}\rho _{3}\rho
_{7}$;
$\theta (\gamma _{\{1,4,8\}})=2\rho _{7}\rho _{15}+\omega ^{2}\rho _{3}\rho
_{15}$;
$\theta (\gamma _{\{2,4,8\}})=\omega \rho _{7}\rho _{15}$;
$\theta (\gamma _{\{1,2,4,8\}})=\rho _{3}\rho _{7}\rho _{15}$.$\square $
\end{quote}
\subsection{The integral cohomology of the groups $PE_{6}$ and $PE_{7}$}
For a space $X$ and a prime $p$ the pair $\{H^{\ast }(X;\mathbb{F
_{p});\delta _{p}\}$ with $\delta _{p}=r_{p}\circ \beta _{p}$ is a cochain
complex whose cohomology $\overline{H}^{\ast }(X;\mathbb{F}_{p})$ is the
\func{mod}p$ \textsl{Bockstein cohomology }of $X$. For $(G,p)=(E_{6},3)$ and
$(E_{7},2)$ the complexes $\{H^{\ast }(PG;\mathbb{F}_{p});\delta _{p}\}$
have been decided by Lemma 4.4 and Theorem 4.5. Explicitly we have
\begin{enumerate}
\item[(4.13a)] $H^{\ast }(PE_{6};\mathbb{F}_{3})=[\func{Im}\pi ^{\ast
}\otimes \Lambda _{\mathbb{F}_{3}}(\varsigma _{1},\varsigma _{7})]\otimes
\Lambda _{\mathbb{F}_{3}}(\varsigma _{2s-1})_{s\in \{2,5,6,8\}}$ with
\quad i) $\func{Im}\pi ^{\ast }=\frac{\mathbb{F}_{3}[\omega ,x_{4}]}
\left\langle \omega ^{9},x_{4}^{3}\right\rangle }$; ii) $\delta
_{3}(\varsigma _{1})=\omega $, $\delta _{3}(\varsigma _{7})=x_{4}$, $\delta
_{2}(\varsigma _{2s-1})=0$,
where in view of iv) of Theorem 4.5 and in the order of $r=1,2,4,5,6,8$
$\quad \varsigma _{2r-1}:=\iota ,\zeta _{3},\zeta _{7},\zeta _{9},\zeta
_{11},\zeta _{15}-x_{4}\zeta _{7}$.
\item[(4.13b)] $H^{\ast }(PE_{7};\mathbb{F}_{2})=[\func{Im}\pi ^{\ast
}\otimes \Delta _{\mathbb{F}_{2}}(\varsigma _{1},\varsigma _{2t-1})_{t\in
\{3,5,9\}}]\otimes \Lambda _{\mathbb{F}_{2}}(\varsigma _{2s-1})_{s\in
\{8,12,14\}}$ with
\quad i) $\func{Im}\pi ^{\ast }=\frac{\mathbb{F}_{2}[\omega
,x_{3},x_{5},x_{9}]}{\left\langle
x_{1}^{2},x_{3}^{2},x_{5}^{2},x_{9}^{2}\right\rangle }$; ii) $\delta
_{3}(\varsigma _{1})=\omega $, $\delta _{3}(\varsigma _{2t-1})=x_{t}$,
\delta _{3}(\varsigma _{2s-1}))=0$,
where in view of v) of Theorem 4.5 and in the order of $r=1,3,5,8,9,12,14$
$\quad \varsigma _{2r-1}:=\iota ,\zeta _{5},\zeta _{9},\zeta
_{15}+x_{3}\zeta _{9},\zeta _{17},\zeta _{23}+x_{3}\zeta _{17},\zeta
_{27}+x_{5}\zeta _{17}$.
\end{enumerate}
In what follows we put $c_{\{1,4\}}=\delta _{3}(\varsigma _{1}\varsigma
_{7})\in H^{9}(PE_{6};\mathbb{F}_{3})$. For a multi--index $I\subseteq
\{1,3,5,9\}$ define the elements
\begin{quote}
$c_{I}=\delta _{2}(\varsigma _{I})\in H^{\ast }(PE_{7};\mathbb{F}_{2})$ with
$\varsigma _{I}=\underset{s\in I}{\Pi }\varsigma _{2s-1}$,.
\end{quote}
\noindent \textbf{Lemma 4.10.} \textsl{The cohomology} $\overline{H}^{\ast
}(PG;\mathbb{F}_{p})$, \textsl{together with} $\func{Im}\delta _{p}$\textsl{
} \textsl{are given by}
\begin{quote}
\textsl{i)} $\overline{H}^{\ast }(PE_{6};\mathbb{F}_{3})\cong \Lambda _
\mathbb{F}_{3}}(\omega ^{8}\varsigma _{1},x_{4}^{2}\varsigma _{7},\varsigma
_{3},\varsigma _{9},\varsigma _{11},\varsigma _{15})$
$\quad \func{Im}\delta _{3}=\frac{\mathbb{F}_{3}[\omega
,x_{4},c_{\{1,4\}}]^{+}}{\left\langle \omega
^{9},x_{4}^{3},c_{\{1,4\}}^{2},x_{1}^{8}x_{4}^{2}c_{\{1,4\}}\right\rangle
\otimes \Lambda _{\mathbb{F}_{3}}(\varsigma _{3},\varsigma _{9},\varsigma
_{11},\varsigma _{15})$
\textsl{ii)} $\overline{H}^{\ast }(PE_{7};\mathbb{F}_{2})\cong \Lambda _
\mathbb{F}_{2}}(\omega \varsigma _{1},x_{3}\varsigma _{5},x_{5}\varsigma
_{9},x_{9}\varsigma _{17},\varsigma _{15},\varsigma _{23},\varsigma _{27})$
\quad $\func{Im}\delta _{2}=\frac{\mathbb{F}_{2}[\omega
,x_{3},x_{5},x_{9},c_{I}]^{+}}{\left\langle \omega
^{2},x_{3}^{2},x_{5}^{2},x_{9}^{2},D_{I},R_{I},S_{I,J}\right\rangle }\otimes
\Lambda _{\mathbb{F}_{2}}(\varsigma _{15},\varsigma _{23},\varsigma _{27})
\textsl{\ with }$\left\vert I\right\vert ,\left\vert J\right\vert \geq 2$,
\end{quote}
\noindent \textsl{where in the presentation of }$\func{Im}\delta _{2}
\textsl{\ the relations }$D_{I},R_{I},S_{I,J}$ \textsl{are, respectively, }
\begin{enumerate}
\item[(4.14)] $\underset{t\in I}{\Sigma }x_{t}c_{I_{t}}=0$\textsl{,} $\quad
\underset{t\in I}{\Pi }x_{t})c_{I}=0$\textsl{, }$c_{I}c_{J}+\underset{t\in I
{\Sigma }x_{t}\underset{s\in I_{t}\cap J}{\Pi }\varsigma
_{2s-1}^{2}c_{\left\langle I_{t},J\right\rangle }=0$\textsl{,}
\end{enumerate}
\noindent \textsl{and where} $(\varsigma _{1}^{2},\varsigma
_{5}^{2},\varsigma _{9}^{2},\varsigma _{17}^{2})=(\omega ,x_{5},x_{9},0)
\textsl{, }$I_{t}$ \textsl{is the complement of} $t\in I$\textsl{,}
\left\langle I,J\right\rangle $ \textsl{denotes the complement of} \textsl
the intersection }$I\cap J$\textsl{\ in the union} $I\cup J$\textsl{.}
\bigskip
\noindent \textbf{Proof.} The results in i) and ii) come from the same
calculation. We may therefore focus on the relatively nontrivial case ii).
In the presentation (4.13b) of $H^{\ast }(PE_{7};\mathbb{F}_{2})$ the first
factor $\func{Im}\pi ^{\ast }\otimes \Delta _{\mathbb{F}_{2}}(\varsigma
_{1},\varsigma _{2t-1})$ is the Koszul complex studied in \cite[Theorem 2.1
{DZ2}, while the differential $\delta _{2}$ acts trivially on the second
factor $\Lambda _{\mathbb{F}_{2}}(\varsigma _{2s-1})$. One gets by \cite
Theorem 2.1]{DZ2} and the K\"{u}nneth formula that
\begin{enumerate}
\item[c)] $\overline{H}^{\ast }(PE_{7};\mathbb{F}_{2})=\Delta _{\mathbb{F
_{2}}(x_{1}\varsigma _{1},x_{3}\varsigma _{5},x_{5}\varsigma
_{9},x_{9}\varsigma _{17})\otimes \Lambda _{\mathbb{F}_{2}}(\varsigma
_{15},\varsigma _{23},\varsigma _{27})$,
\item[d)] $\func{Im}\delta _{2}=\frac{\func{Im}\pi ^{\ast }\{1,c_{I}\}^{+}}
\left\langle D_{J},R_{K}\right\rangle }\otimes \Lambda _{\mathbb{F
_{2}}(\varsigma _{15},\varsigma _{23},\varsigma _{27})$,
\end{enumerate}
\noindent where $I,J,K\subseteq \{1,3,5,9\}\QTR{sl}{\ }$with $\left\vert
I\right\vert ,\left\vert J\right\vert ,\left\vert K\right\vert \geq 2$. By
v) of Theorem 4.5 the formula c) of $\overline{H}^{\ast }(PE_{7};\mathbb{F
_{2})$ is identical to the one stated in ii). To modify the additive
presentation of $\func{Im}\delta _{2}$ in d) into its ring presentation in
ii) one needs to clarify the multiplicative rule among the classes $c_{I}
's. This brings us the relations of the type $S_{I,J}$ which are obtained by
the following calculation:
\begin{quote}
$c_{I}c_{J}=\delta _{2}(\varsigma _{I})\delta _{2}(\varsigma _{J})=\delta
_{2}(\delta _{2}(\varsigma _{I})\varsigma _{J})$ (since $\delta _{2}^{2}=0$)
$=\delta _{2}(\underset{t\in I}{\Sigma }x_{t}\varsigma _{I_{t}}\varsigma
_{J})$ (since $\delta _{2}(\varsigma _{I})=\underset{t\in I}{\Sigma
-x_{t}\varsigma _{I_{t}}$)
$=\delta _{2}(\underset{t\in I}{\Sigma }x_{t}\underset{s\in I_{t}\cap J}{\Pi
}\zeta _{2s-1}^{2}\zeta _{\left\langle I_{t},J\right\rangle })$ (with
\underset{s\in I\cap J}{\Pi }\varsigma _{2s-1}^{2}=1$ if $I\cap J=\emptyset
)
$=\underset{t\in I}{\Sigma }x_{t}\underset{s\in I_{t}\cap J}{\Pi }\varsigma
_{2s-1}^{2}c_{\left\langle I_{t},J\right\rangle }$ (since $\delta
_{2}(x_{t})=0$, $\delta _{2}(\varsigma _{2s-1}^{2})=0$).$\square $
\end{quote}
The presentations of the Bockstein cohomology\textsl{\ }$\overline{H}^{\ast
}(PG;\mathbb{F}_{p})$ in Lemma 4.10 provide us with crucial information on
reduction $r_{p}:H^{\ast }(PG)\rightarrow H^{\ast }(PG;\mathbb{F}_{p})$ for
(G,p)=(E_{6},3)$ and $(E_{7},2)$. Indeed, in view of the decomposition (4.8)
for $X=PG$ we write $r_{p}^{0}$ and $r_{p}^{1}$ for the restrictions of
r_{p}$ on $\mathcal{F}(PG)$ and $\sigma _{p}(PG)$, respectively. With
\begin{quote}
$\dim \overline{H}^{\ast }(PE_{6};\mathbb{F}_{3})=2^{6}$ and $\dim \overline
H}^{\ast }(PE_{7};\mathbb{F}_{2})=2^{7}$
\end{quote}
\noindent by Lemma 4.10 the result \cite[Theorem 2.7]{DZ2} implies that
\begin{enumerate}
\item[(4.15)] $r_{p}^{1}$ is an isomorphism $\sigma _{p}(PG)\cong \func{Im
\delta _{p}$;
\item[(4.16)] $r_{p}^{0}$ induces an isomorphism $\mathcal{F}(PG)/p\cdot
\mathcal{F}(PG)\rightarrow \overline{H}^{\ast }(PG;\mathbb{F}_{p})$.
\end{enumerate}
To apply the exact sequence (1.8) to compute $H^{\ast }(PG)$ we need
information on the cohomology of the group $G$. In term of the set $S(G)$ of
primary characteristic polynomials for $G=E_{6}$ and $E_{7}$ over $\mathbb{Z}
$ given in Table 5.4 (see also Example 3.6) let $D(G)$ be the degree set of
elements in $S(G)$.\textbf{\ }That is
\begin{quote}
$D(E_{6})=\{2,5,6,8,9,12\}$; $D(E_{7})=\{2,6,8,10,12,14,18\}$
\end{quote}
\noindent For each $s\in D(G)$ we set $\gamma _{2s-1}=\varphi (P)\in
E_{3}^{\ast ,1}(G)$, where $P\in S(G)$ with $\deg P=s$. To save notations we
maintain $\gamma _{2s-1}$ for $\kappa (\gamma _{2s-1})\in H^{\ast }(G)$. By
\cite[Theorem 1.9]{DZ2} the integral cohomology $H^{\ast }(G)$ has the
following presentations
\begin{enumerate}
\item[(4.17a)] $H^{\ast }(E_{6})=\Delta (\gamma _{3})\otimes \Lambda (\gamma
_{9},\gamma _{11},\gamma _{15},\gamma _{17},\gamma _{23})\oplus \sigma
_{2}(E_{6})\oplus \sigma _{3}(E_{6})$ with
$\qquad \sigma _{2}(E_{6})=\mathbb{F}_{2}[x_{3}]^{+}/\left\langle
x_{3}^{2}\right\rangle \otimes \Delta (\gamma _{3})\otimes \Lambda (\gamma
_{9},\gamma _{15},\gamma _{17},\gamma _{23})$\textsl{,}
where $\gamma _{3}^{2}=x_{3}$\textsl{, }$x_{3}\gamma _{11}=0$\textsl{, }
x_{4}\gamma _{23}=0$\textsl{.}
\item[(4.17b)] $H^{\ast }(E_{7})=\Delta (\gamma _{3})\otimes \Lambda _
\mathbb{Z}}(\gamma _{11},\gamma _{15},\gamma _{19},\gamma _{23},\gamma
_{27},\gamma _{35})\underset{p=2,3}{\oplus }\sigma _{p}(E_{7})$ with
$\qquad \sigma _{3}(E_{7})=\frac{\mathbb{F}_{3}[x_{4}]^{+}}{\left\langle
x_{4}^{3}\right\rangle }\otimes \Lambda (\gamma _{3},\gamma _{11},\gamma
_{15},\gamma _{19},\gamma _{27},\gamma _{35})$\textsl{,}
where $\gamma _{3}^{2}=x_{3}$\textsl{, }$x_{4}\gamma _{23}=0$, $r\in
\{11,19,35\}$,
\end{enumerate}
\noindent where the classes $x_{i}$'s are the special Schubert classes on
E_{n}/T$, $n=6,7$, specified in (5.1), and where the formulae of the ideals
\sigma _{3}(E_{6})$ and $\sigma _{2}(E_{7})$ are not needed in sequel, hence
are omitted.
With $\gamma _{2s-1}=\kappa \varphi (P)$ one computes $\theta (\gamma
_{2s-1})$ by the formula (3.17) to yield
\begin{enumerate}
\item[(4.18)] $\theta (\gamma _{2s-1})=0$ with the only exceptions: $\theta
(\gamma _{2s-1})=\omega ^{8}$ or $\omega $ for\textsl{\ }$(G,s)=(E_{6},9)$
or $(E_{7},2)$ (see the contents of Table 5.5).
\end{enumerate}
\noindent In view of the presentations (4.13a) and (4.13b) introduce the
elements
\begin{quote}
$\mathcal{C}_{\{1,4\}}=\beta _{3}(\varsigma _{1}\varsigma _{7})$ $\in \sigma
_{3}(PE_{6})$, $\mathcal{C}_{K}=\beta _{2}(\underset{t\in K}{\Pi }\varsigma
_{2t-1})\in \sigma _{2}(E_{7})$,
\end{quote}
\noindent where $K\subseteq \{1,3,5,9\}$. For $I,J\subset \{1,3,5,9\}$\ with
$\left\vert I\right\vert ,\left\vert J\right\vert \geq 2$ let $\mathcal{D
_{I},\mathcal{R}_{I},\mathcal{S}_{I,J}\in \sigma _{2}(E_{7})$ be
respectively the elements\ obtained by substituting in the polynomials
D_{I},R_{I},S_{I,J}\in \mathbb{F}_{2}[\omega ,x_{3},x_{5},x_{9},c_{I}]^{+}$
in (4.14) the classes $c_{I}$\ by $C_{I}$.
\bigskip
\noindent \textbf{Lemma 4.11.} \textsl{For each }$s\in D(G)$\textsl{\ there
exists a class }$\rho _{2s-1}\in \func{Im}\kappa $\textsl{\ satisfying}
\begin{enumerate}
\item[i)] $C^{\ast }(\rho _{2s-1})=a_{s}\cdot \gamma _{2s-1}$\textsl{, where
}$a_{s}=1$\textsl{\ with the only exceptions: }
$a_{9}=3$\textsl{\ for }$E_{6}$\textsl{; }$a_{2}=2$\textsl{\ for }$E_{7}
\textsl{.}
\item[ii)] $\mathcal{F}(PG)=\left\{
\begin{tabular}{l}
$\Delta (\rho _{3})\otimes \Lambda (\rho _{9},\rho _{11},\rho _{15},\rho
_{17},\rho _{23})$ \textsl{with} $\rho _{3}^{2}=x_{3}$ \textsl{for} $G=E_{6}
; \\
$\Lambda (\rho _{3},\rho _{11},\rho _{15},\rho _{19},\rho _{23},\rho
_{27},\rho _{35})$ \textsl{for} $G=E_{7}$
\end{tabular
\right. $
\item[iii)] $\sigma _{p}(PG)=\left\{
\begin{tabular}{l}
$\frac{\mathbb{F}_{3}[\omega ,x_{4},\mathcal{C}_{\{1,4\}}]^{+}\otimes
\Lambda (\rho _{3},\rho _{9},\rho _{11},\rho _{15},\rho _{17})}{\left\langle
\omega ^{9},x_{4}^{3},\omega \cdot \rho _{17},\mathcal{C}_{\{1,4\}}^{2}
\omega ^{8}x_{4}^{2}\mathcal{C}_{\{1,4\}}\right\rangle }$ \textsl{for}
(G,p)=(E_{6},3);$ \\
$\frac{\mathbb{F}_{2}[\omega ,x_{3},x_{5},x_{9},\mathcal{C}_{I}]^{+}}
\left\langle x_{1}^{2},x_{3}^{2},x_{5}^{2},x_{9}^{2},\mathcal{D}_{I}
\mathcal{R}_{I},\mathcal{S}_{I,J}\right\rangle }\otimes \Lambda (\rho
_{15},\rho _{23},\rho _{27})$ \textsl{for} $(G,p)=(E_{7},2)$
\end{tabular
\right. $
\end{enumerate}
\noindent \textbf{Proof.} The classes $\rho _{2s-1}\in \func{Im}\kappa $ are
specified by $\theta (a_{s}\gamma _{2s-1})=0$ by (4.18), as well as the
exact sequence (1.8). This shows i).
For ii) the degree of the covering $c:G\rightarrow PG$ satisfies that $\deg
c=a_{D(D)}$ ($=3$ or $2$ for $E_{6}$ or $E_{7}$) by i). The same argument as
that used in the proof of iii) of Lemma 4.6 shows that the set $\{1,\rho
_{I}\mid $ $I\subseteq D(G)\}$ of monomials is a basis of $\mathcal{F}(PG)$.
Since $\rho _{2s-1}\in \func{Im}\kappa $ and since the reduction $r_{p}$
preserves $\func{Im}\kappa $ we get from (4.16) and the formula of
\overline{H}^{\ast }(PG;\mathbb{F}_{p})$ in Lemma 4.10 the relations
\begin{enumerate}
\item[(4.19a)] $r_{3}(\rho _{2s-1})\in \left\{ \omega ^{8}\varsigma
_{1},x_{4}^{2}\varsigma _{7},\varsigma _{3},\varsigma _{9},\varsigma
_{11},\varsigma _{15}\right\} $ \textsl{for} $PE_{6}$;
\item[(4.19b)] $r_{2}(\rho _{2s-1})\in \left\{ \omega \varsigma
_{1},x_{3}\varsigma _{5},x_{5}\varsigma _{9},x_{9}\varsigma _{17},\varsigma
_{15},\varsigma _{23},\varsigma _{27}\right\} $ \textsl{for} $PE_{7}$.
\end{enumerate}
\noindent These determine the classes $r_{p}(\rho _{2s-1})\in $ $H^{\ast
}(PG;\mathbb{F}_{p})$ for the degree reason.
To complete the proof of ii) it remains to show that $\rho _{2s-1}^{2}=0$
with the only exception $\rho _{3}^{2}=x_{3}$ when $G=E_{6}$. For $PE_{7}$
this comes from $\rho _{2s-1}^{2}\in \sigma _{2}(PE_{7})$, the injectivity
of $r_{2}$ on $\sigma _{2}(PE_{7})$ by (4.15), as well as the relation
(4.19b). For $PE_{6}$ we shall show in the proof of Theorem 4.12 that the
map $C^{\ast }$ restricts to a ring monomorphism $\sigma
_{2}(PE_{6})\rightarrow \sigma _{2}(E_{6}\times S^{1})$. One obtains i) from
\begin{quote}
$C^{\ast }(\rho _{2s-1})\equiv \gamma _{2s-1}\func{mod}2$, $C^{\ast
}(x_{3})\equiv x_{3}\func{mod}2$ (see ii) of Lemma 4.2),
\end{quote}
\noindent as well as the relations $\gamma _{3}^{2}=x_{6},\gamma
_{2s-1}^{2}=0$, $s\geq 3$, on the ring $H^{\ast }(E_{6})$ by (4.19a).
Finally, granted with the isomorphisms $r_{p}^{1}$ in (4.15), the relations
(4.19a) and (4.19b) suffice to translate the presentations of $\func{Im
\delta _{p}$ in Lemma 4.10 into the formulae for the ideals $\sigma _{p}(PG)$
stated in iii).$\square $
\bigskip
We present the integral cohomology $H^{\ast }(PG)$ with $G=E_{6}$\ and
E_{7} $ by the set $\{\rho _{2s-1}\}\subset \func{Im}\kappa $ of $1$--forms
specified by i) of Lemma 4.11, the subring $\func{Im}\pi ^{\ast }$ given by
(4.2), together the torsion classes $\mathcal{C}_{K}$.
\bigskip
\noindent \textbf{Theorem 4.12. }\textsl{The rings }$H^{\ast }(PG)$\textsl{\
with }$G=E_{6}$\textsl{\ and }$E_{7}$ \textsl{are}
\begin{enumerate}
\item[i)] $H^{\ast }(PE_{6})=\Delta (\rho _{3})\otimes \Lambda (\rho
_{9},\rho _{11},\rho _{15},\rho _{17},\rho _{23})\underset{p=2,3}{\oplus
\sigma _{p}(PE_{6})$\textsl{\ with}
$\quad \sigma _{2}(PE_{6})=\mathbb{F}_{2}[x_{3}]^{+}/\left\langle
x_{3}^{2}\right\rangle \otimes \Delta (\rho _{3})\otimes \Lambda (\rho
_{9},\rho _{15},\rho _{17},\rho _{23})$\textsl{,}
$\quad \sigma _{3}(PE_{6})=\frac{\mathbb{F}_{3}[\omega ,x_{4},\mathcal{C
_{\{1,4\}}]^{+}\otimes \Lambda (\rho _{3},\rho _{9},\rho _{11},\rho
_{15},\rho _{17})}{\left\langle \omega ^{9},x_{4}^{3},\omega \cdot \rho
_{17},\mathcal{C}_{\{1,4\}}^{2},\omega ^{8}x_{4}^{2}\mathcal{C
_{\{1,4\}}\right\rangle }$\textsl{,}
\textsl{that are subject the relations}
$\quad \rho _{3}^{2}=x_{3}$\textsl{, }$x_{3}\rho _{11}=0$\textsl{, }
x_{4}\rho _{23}=0$\textsl{, }$\omega \rho _{23}=x_{4}^{2}\mathcal{C
_{\{1,4\}}$\textsl{,} $\mathcal{C}_{\{1,4\}}\rho _{23}=0$.
\item[ii)] $H^{\ast }(PE_{7})=\Lambda (\rho _{3},\rho _{11},\rho _{15},\rho
_{19},\rho _{23},\rho _{27},\rho _{35})\underset{p=2,3}{\oplus }\sigma
_{p}(PE_{7})$ \textsl{with}
$\quad \sigma _{2}(PE_{7})=\frac{\mathbb{F}_{2}[\omega ,x_{3},x_{5},x_{9}
\mathcal{C}_{I}]^{+}}{\left\langle x_{1}^{2},x_{3}^{2},x_{5}^{2},x_{9}^{2}
\mathcal{D}_{I},\mathcal{R}_{I},\mathcal{S}_{I,J}\right\rangle }\otimes
\Lambda (\rho _{15},\rho _{23},\rho _{27})$;
$\quad \sigma _{3}(PE_{7})=\frac{\mathbb{F}_{3}[x_{4}]^{+}}{\left\langle
x_{4}^{3}\right\rangle }\otimes \Lambda (\rho _{3},\rho _{11},\rho
_{15},\rho _{19},\rho _{27},\rho _{35})$\textsl{,}
\textsl{that are subject to the relations, where} $K\subseteq
\{1,3,5,9\},s\in \{2,6,10,18\}$\textsl{,}
$\quad x_{4}\varrho _{23}=0$\textsl{,} $\rho _{2s-1}C_{K}=0$ \textsl{if}
s\in K,$ $\rho _{2s-1}C_{K}=x_{\frac{s}{2}}C_{K\cup \{s\}}$ \textsl{if}
s\notin K$\textsl{.}
\end{enumerate}
\noindent \textbf{Proof. }The presentations of $\mathcal{F}(PG)$, together
with the ideals $\sigma _{3}(PE_{6})$ and $\sigma _{2}(PE_{7})$, have been
shown by Lemma 4.11. Moreover, with $\left\langle \omega \right\rangle \in
\sigma _{3}(PE_{6})$ by $3\omega =0$ ($\left\langle \omega \right\rangle \in
\sigma _{2}(PE_{7})$ by $2\omega =0$) formula (4.8) yields that
\begin{quote}
$H^{\ast }(PE_{6})_{\left\langle \omega \right\rangle }=\mathcal{F}(PE_{6}
\underset{p\neq 3}{\oplus }\sigma _{p}(PE_{6})\oplus \sigma
_{3}(PE_{6})/\left\langle \omega \right\rangle $
(resp. $H^{\ast }(PE_{7})_{\left\langle \omega \right\rangle }=\mathcal{F
(PE_{7})\underset{p\neq 2}{\oplus }\sigma _{p}(PE_{7})\oplus \sigma
_{2}(PE_{6})/\left\langle \omega \right\rangle $).
\end{quote}
\noindent In particular, the map $C^{\ast }$ in (1.8) restricts to the
monomorphisms
\begin{quote}
$\sigma _{p}(PE_{6})\rightarrow \sigma _{p}(E_{6}\times S^{1})$, $p\neq 3$ (
\sigma _{p}(PE_{7})\rightarrow \sigma _{p}(E_{7}\times S^{1})$, $p\neq 2$).
\end{quote}
\noindent It implies, in addition to $\sigma _{p}(PG)=0$ for all $p\neq 2,3
, that
\begin{quote}
$\sigma _{2}(PE_{6})\cong \sigma _{2}(E_{6})$ (resp. $\sigma
_{3}(PE_{7})\cong \sigma _{3}(E_{7})$) under $C^{\ast }$.
\end{quote}
\noindent One obtains from (4.17a) (resp. (4.17b)) the presentation of
\sigma _{2}(PE_{6})$ (resp. $\sigma _{3}(PE_{7})$), together with the
relation $x_{3}\rho _{11}=0$ (resp. $x_{4}\varrho _{23}=0$), as that stated
in the theorem.
Finally, granted with the isomorphism $r_{p}^{1}$ in (4.15), Theorem 4.5, as
well as the relations (4.19a) and (4.19b) that characterize the reduction
r_{p}^{1}:$ $\mathcal{F}(PG)\rightarrow H^{\ast }(PG;\mathbb{F}_{p})$, one
verifies the following relations
\begin{quote}
a) $x_{4}\rho _{23}=0$\textsl{, }$\omega \rho _{23}=x_{4}^{2}\mathcal{C
_{\{1,4\}}$\textsl{,} $\mathcal{C}_{\{1,4\}}\rho _{23}=0$;
b) $x_{4}\varrho _{23}=0$\textsl{,} $\rho _{2s-1}C_{K}=0$ if $s\in K,$ $=x_
\frac{s}{2}}C_{I\cup \{s\}}$ if $s\notin K$.
\end{quote}
\noindent that characterize the action of $\mathcal{F}(PG)$ on $\sigma
_{p}(PG)$, respectively for $(G,p)=(E_{6},3)$ or $(E_{7},2)$. As example,
combining (4.15) and iv) of Theorem 4.5, the relations in a) are verified by
the following calculations in the ring $H^{\ast }(PE_{6};\mathbb{F}_{3})$
\begin{quote}
$r_{3}(\omega \rho _{23})=\omega x_{4}^{2}\zeta _{7}=x_{4}^{2}(\omega \zeta
_{7}-\iota x_{4})=x_{4}^{2}c_{\{1,4\}}$;
$r_{3}(x_{4}\rho _{23})=x_{4}^{3}\zeta _{7}=0$; $r_{3}(\mathcal{C
_{\{1,4\}}\rho _{23})=(\omega \zeta _{7}-\iota x_{4})x_{4}^{2}\zeta _{7}=0$,
\end{quote}
\noindent where $r_{3}(\rho _{23})=x_{4}^{2}\zeta _{7}$ by (4.19a).$\square $
\subsection{Historical remarks}
The rings $H^{\ast }(PG;\mathbb{F}_{p})$ concerned by Theorem 4.5 have been
previously computed by Baum and Browder \cite{BB} for $G=SU(n),Sp(n)$, and
by Toda, Kono and Ishitoya \cite{IKT,Ko} for $G=E_{6},E_{7}$. However, with
respect to our explicitly constructed generators on $H^{\ast }(PG;\mathbb{F
_{p})$ the Bockstein operator $\beta _{p}$ can be effectively calculated,
which played a crucial role to decide the torsion ideals $\sigma _{p}(PG)$
of the integral cohomology $H^{\ast }(PG)$.
In \cite[Theorem A]{R} Ruiz stated a presentation of the integral cohomology
ring of the projective complex Stiefel manifold $Y_{n,n-m}$. It implies when
taking $m=0$ that the map $h$ in Theorem 1.3 is an isomorphism for the group
$PSU(n)$. That is, the relations of the form $\omega \theta (\gamma _{I})$
with $\left\vert I\right\vert \geq 2$ are absent. Computation in Example 4.9
indicates that these missing relations are highly nontrival.
The formula (2.9) for the Borel transgression $\tau $ is an essential
ingredient for the computation throughout Section 4. On the other hand in
\cite[formula (4)]{K} Ka\v{c} stated a formula for the differential $d_{2}$
on $E_{2}^{\ast ,\ast }(G;\mathbb{F}_{p})$ which implies that the map $\tau $
is an isomorphism for any semi--simple Lie group $G$ and characteristic $p$.
These suggest to us that a proof of Theorem 2.4 is unavoidable.
According Grothendieck \cite{G} the subring $\func{Im}\pi ^{\ast }$ $\subset
H^{\ast }(PG)$ is the \textsl{Chow ring} $A^{\ast }(PG^{c})$ of the
reductive algebraic group $PG^{c}$ corresponding to $PG$. In this regard the
formulae (4.2) presents the Chow rings $A^{\ast }(PG^{c})$ for $G=SU(n)$,
Sp(n)$, $E_{6}$, $E_{7}$ by explicit Schubert classes on $G/T$.
It has been known for a long time that for cohomology with coefficients in a
field $\mathbb{F}$ one has $E_{3}^{\ast ,\ast }(G;\mathbb{F})=H^{\ast }(G
\mathbb{F})$ \cite{K,Re}. For the integral cohomology the maps $\pi ^{\ast }$
and $\kappa $ in (3.5) and (3.6) provide a direct passage from $E_{3}^{\ast
,\ast }(G)$ to $H^{\ast }(G)$ useful to show the much stronger relation
\begin{enumerate}
\item[(4.20)] $E_{3}^{\ast ,\ast }(G)=H^{\ast }(G)$.
\end{enumerate}
\noindent Indeed, for the $1$--connected Lie groups $G$ the relation (4.20)
was conjecture by Marlin \cite{M} and has been confirmed by the authors in
\cite[Theorem 3.6]{DZ2}, while our proofs of Theorem 4.7 and Theorem 4.12
indicate that the relation (4.20) holds more generally by all compact Lie
groups.
\section{Schubert calculus}
This section generates and records the intermediate data facilitating the
computation in Section 4. It serves also the purpose to illustrate how the
construction and computation with the cohomology of compact Lie groups $G$
can be boiling down to computing with certain polynomials in the Schubert
classes on $G/T$.
\subsection{ Schubert presentation of the ring $H^{\ast }(G/T)$}
Let $m=n-1,n,6$ or $7$ in accordance to $G=SU(n),Sp(n),E_{6}$ or $E_{7}$. In
view of the Schubert basis $\left\{ \omega _{1},\cdots ,\omega _{m}\right\} $
on $H^{2}(G/T)$ (see Lemma 2.3) we define the polynomials $c_{r}(G)\in
H^{\ast }(BT)=\mathbb{Z}\left[ \omega _{1},\cdots ,\omega _{m}\right] $ to
be the $r^{th}$ elementary symmetric polynomials on the set $\Omega (G)$
specified below
\begin{quote}
$\Omega (SU(n))=\left\{ \omega _{{\footnotesize 1}},\omega _{{\footnotesize
}}-\omega _{{\footnotesize k-1}},-\omega _{{\footnotesize n-1}}\mid 2\leq
k\leq n-1\right\} $;
$\Omega (Sp(n))=\left\{ \pm \omega _{{\footnotesize 1}},\pm (\omega _
{\footnotesize k}}-\omega _{{\footnotesize k-1}})\mid 2\leq k\leq n\right\}
;
$\Omega (E_{6})=\left\{ \omega _{{\footnotesize 6}},\omega _{{\footnotesize
}}-\omega _{{\footnotesize 6}},\omega _{{\footnotesize 4}}-\omega _
{\footnotesize 5}},\omega _{{\footnotesize 2}}+\omega _{{\footnotesize 3
}-\omega _{{\footnotesize 4}},\omega _{{\footnotesize 1}}+\omega _
{\footnotesize 2}}-\omega _{{\footnotesize 3}},\omega _{{\footnotesize 2
}-\omega _{{\footnotesize 1}}\right\} $;
${\small \Omega (E}_{7}{\small )=}\left\{ \omega _{{\footnotesize 7}},\omega
_{{\footnotesize 6}}-\omega _{{\footnotesize 7}},\omega _{{\footnotesize 5
}-\omega _{{\footnotesize 6}},\omega _{{\footnotesize 4}}-\omega _
{\footnotesize 5}},\omega _{{\footnotesize 2}}+\omega _{{\footnotesize 3
}-\omega _{{\footnotesize 4}},\omega _{1}+\omega _{2}-\omega _{3},\omega _
{\footnotesize 2}}-\omega _{{\footnotesize 1}}\right\} $.
\end{quote}
\noindent Using the \textsl{Weyl coordinates} $\sigma _{\lbrack i_{1},\cdots
,i_{k}]}$ for the Schubert classes on $G/T$ (\cite[Definition 2]{DZ2}) we
introduce also the \textsl{special Schubert classes} $x_{r}$ on $G/T$ by
\begin{enumerate}
\item[(5.1)] $(x_{3},x_{4}):=(\sigma _{\lbrack 5,4,2]},\sigma _{\lbrack
6,5,4,2]})$ for $G=E_{6}$;
$(x_{3},x_{4},x_{5},x_{9}):=(\sigma _{\lbrack 5,4,2]},\sigma _{\lbrack
6,5,4,2]},\sigma _{\lbrack {7,6,5,4,2}]},\sigma _{\lbrack
1,5,4,3,7,6,5,4,2]})$ for $G=E_{7}$.
\end{enumerate}
\noindent With these notation we have by \cite{DZ1} the following
presentations of the cohomologies $H^{\ast }(G/T)$ in term of explicit
generators and relations, where in the cases of $G=E_{6}$ and $E_{7}$ and in
comparison with Theorem 2.6, we use $x_{\deg y_{i}}$ in place of $y_{i}$,
and write $R_{\deg h_{i}}$, $R_{\deg f_{j}}$, $R_{\deg g_{j}}$ instead of
h_{i},f_{j},g_{j}$. In view of the map $\psi :G/T\rightarrow BT$ in (3.6) we
shall also reserve the nation $c_{r}(G)$ for the class $\psi ^{\ast
}(c_{r}(G))\in H^{\ast }(G/T)$.
\bigskip
\noindent \textbf{Theorem 5.1. }\textsl{The ring }$H^{\ast }(G/T)$ \textsl
has the following presentations}
\begin{enumerate}
\item[i)] $H^{\ast }(SU(n)/T){\small =}\mathbb{Z}\left[ \omega _{1},\cdots
,\omega _{n-1}\right] /\left\langle c_{2},\cdots ,c_{n}\right\rangle
\textsl{,} $c_{r}=c_{r}({\small SU(n)})$,
\item[ii)] $H^{\ast }(Sp(n)/T)=\mathbb{Z}\left[ \omega _{1},\cdots ,\omega
_{n}\right] /\left\langle c_{2},c_{4},\cdots ,c_{2n}\right\rangle $\textsl{,}
$c_{2r}=c_{2r}(Sp(n))$.
\item[iii)] $H^{\ast }(E_{6}/T)=\mathbb{Z}[\omega _{1},\cdots ,\omega
_{6},x_{3},x_{4}]/\left\langle
R_{2},R_{3},R_{4},R_{5},R_{6},R_{8},R_{9},R_{12}\right\rangle $\textsl{,
where}
$R_{2}=4\omega _{2}^{2}-c_{2}$;
$R_{3}=2x_{3}+2\omega _{2}^{3}-c_{3}$;
$R_{4}=3x_{4}+\omega _{2}^{4}-c_{4}$;
$R_{5}=2\omega _{2}^{2}x_{3}-\omega _{2}c_{4}+c_{5}$;
$R_{6}=x_{3}^{2}-\omega _{2}c_{5}+2c_{6}$;
$R_{8}=x_{4}(c_{4}-\omega _{2}^{4})-2c_{5}x_{3}-\omega _{2}^{2}c_{6}+\omega
_{2}^{3}c_{5};$
$R_{9}=2x_{3}c_{6}-\omega _{2}^{3}c_{6}$;
$R_{12}=x_{4}^{3}-c_{6}^{2}$.
\item[iv)] $H^{\ast }(E_{7}/T)=\mathbb{Z}[\omega _{1},\cdots ,\omega
_{7},x_{3},x_{4},x_{5},x_{9}]/\left\langle R_{t}\right\rangle $\textsl{,
where }$t\in \{2,3,4,5,6,8,$ $9,10,12,14,18\}$\textsl{, and where}
$R_{2}=4\omega _{2}^{2}-c_{2}$;
$R_{3}=2x_{3}+2\omega _{2}^{3}-c_{3}$;
$R_{4}=3x_{4}+\omega _{2}^{4}-c_{4}$;
$R_{5}=2x_{5}-2\omega _{2}^{2}x_{3}+\omega _{2}c_{4}-c_{5}$;
$R_{6}=x_{3}^{2}-\omega _{2}c_{5}+2c_{6}$;
$R_{8}=3x_{4}^{2}-x_{5}(2\omega _{2}^{3}-c_{3})-2x_{3}c_{5}+2\omega
_{2}c_{7}-\omega _{2}^{2}c_{6}+\omega _{2}^{3}c_{5}$;
$R_{9}=2{x_{9}}+{x_{4}(2\omega _{2}^{2}x_{3}-\omega _{2}c_{4}+c_{5})}-2
x_{3}c_{6}}-{\omega _{2}^{2}c_{7}}+{\omega _{2}^{3}c_{6}}$;
$R_{10}=x_{5}^{2}-2x_{3}c_{7}+\omega _{2}^{3}c_{7}$;
$R_{12}=x_{4}^{3}-4x_{5}c_{7}-c_{6}^{2}+(2\omega
_{2}^{3}-c_{3})(x_{9}+x_{4}x_{5})+2\omega _{2}x_{5}c_{6}+3\omega
_{2}x_{4}c_{7}+c_{5}c_{7}$;
$R_{14}=c_{7}^{2}-(2\omega _{2}^{2}x_{3}-\omega
_{2}c_{4}+c_{5})x_{9}+2x_{3}x_{4}c_{7}-\omega _{2}^{3}x_{4}c_{7}$;
$R_{18}=x_{9}^{2}+2x_{5}c_{6}c_{7}-x_{4}c_{7}^{2}-(2\omega
_{2}^{2}x_{3}-\omega _{2}c_{4}+c_{5})x_{4}x_{9}-(2\omega
_{2}^{3}-c_{3})x_{5}^{3}$
$\qquad \quad -5\omega _{2}x_{5}^{2}c_{7}$.$\square $
\end{enumerate}
As in Section 4.1 we take a set $\Omega =\{\phi _{1},\cdots ,\phi _{m}\}$ of
fundamental dominant weights as a basis for the unit lattice $\Lambda _{e}$
of the adjoint Lie group $PG$, and let $\{t_{1},\cdots ,t_{m}\}$ be the
corresponding basis on the group $H^{1}(T)$. Granted with the Cartan
matrices of simple Lie groups given in \cite[p.59]{H} the formula (2.9) for
the transgression $\tau $ in the fibration $\pi :$ $PG\rightarrow G/T$
yields that
\bigskip
\noindent \textbf{Lemma 5.2.} \textsl{In the order of }
G=SU(n),Sp(n),E_{6},E_{7}$\textsl{\ the following relations hold in the
quotient group} $H^{2}(G/T)/\func{Im}\tau $
\begin{quote}
i) $\omega _{k}=k\omega _{1}$\textsl{, }$1\leq k\leq n-1$\textsl{, }$n\omega
_{1}=0$\textsl{;}
ii) $\omega _{k}=k\omega _{1}$\textsl{,}$1\leq k\leq n$\textsl{, }$2\omega
_{1}=0$\textsl{;}
iii) $\omega _{2}=\omega _{4}=0$\textsl{, }$\omega _{1}=\omega _{5}=2\omega
_{3}=2\omega _{6}$\textsl{, }$3\omega _{1}=0$\textsl{;}
iv) $\omega _{1}=\omega _{3}=\omega _{4}=\omega _{6}=0$\textsl{, }$\omega
_{5}=\omega _{7}=\omega _{2}$\textsl{, }$2\omega _{2}=0$\textsl{.}
\end{quote}
\noindent \textsl{Consequently}
\begin{quote}
a) $c_{r}(SU(n))\mid _{\tau (t_{1})=\cdots =\tau (t_{n-1})=0\QTR{sl}{\ }}
\binom{n}{r}\omega _{1}^{r}$\textsl{, }$2\leq r\leq n$\textsl{;}
b) $c_{2r}(Sp(n))\mid _{\tau (t_{1})=\cdots =\tau (t_{n})=0\QTR{sl}{\ }}
\binom{n}{r}\omega _{1}^{2r}$\textsl{, }$1\leq r\leq n$\textsl{;}
c) $c_{r}(E_{6})\mid _{\tau (t_{1})=\cdots =\tau (t_{6})=0\QTR{sl}{\
}=(-1)^{r}\binom{6}{r}\omega _{1}^{r}$\textsl{, }$1\leq r\leq 6$\textsl{;}
d) $c_{r}(E_{7})\mid _{\tau (t_{1})=\cdots =\tau (t_{7})=0\QTR{sl}{\ }}
\binom{7}{r}\omega _{2}^{r}$\textsl{, }$1\leq r\leq 7$.$\square $
\end{quote}
\subsection{Computing with the $\mathbb{F}_{p}$--characteristic polynomials}
Let $(G,p)=(SU(n),p)$, $(Sp(n),2)$, $(E_{6},3)$ and $(E_{7},2)$. From
Theorem 5.1 one deduces a set $S_{p}(G):=\left\{ \delta _{1},\cdots ,\delta
_{m}\right\} $ of\textsl{\ }primary characteristic polynomials for $G$ over
\mathbb{F}_{p}$ (see Example 3.7) as that presented in the following table,
where $(H)_{p}\in \mathbb{F}_{p}[\omega _{1},\cdots ,\omega _{m}]$ denotes $
\func{mod}p$, $H\in \mathbb{Z}[\omega _{1},\cdots ,\omega _{m}]$.
\begin{center}
\textbf{Table 5.1. }A set $S_{p}(G)$ of primary characteristic polynomials
for $G$ over $\mathbb{F}_{p}$
\begin{tabular}{l|l}
\hline\hline
$(G,p)$ & $S_{p}(G)=\left\{ \delta _{1},\cdots ,\delta _{m}\right\} $ \\
\hline
$(SU(n),p)$ & $\left( c_{k}\right) _{p},2\leq k\leq n$ \\ \hline
$(Sp(n),2)$ & $\left( c_{2k}\right) _{2},1\leq k\leq n$ \\ \hline
$(E_{6},3)$ &
\begin{tabular}{l}
$(\omega
_{2}^{2}-c_{2})_{3},(c_{2}^{2}-c_{4})_{3},(c_{5}+c_{2}c_{3})_{3},\left(
c_{6}-c_{2}c_{4}-c_{3}^{2}\right) _{3}$ \\
$(-c_{3}c_{5}-c_{2}c_{6})_{3},(c_{6}c_{3})_{3}
\end{tabular}
\\ \hline
$(E_{7},2)$ &
\begin{tabular}{l}
$\left( c_{2}\right) _{2},\left( c_{3}\right) _{2},\left( c_{5}+\omega
_{2}c_{4}\right) _{2},\left( c_{4}^{2}+\omega _{2}^{2}c_{6}+\omega
_{2}^{3}c_{5}+\omega _{2}^{8}\right) _{2},$ \\
$\left( \omega _{2}^{2}c_{7}+\omega _{2}^{3}c_{6}\right) _{2},\left(
c_{6}^{2}+c_{4}^{3}\right) _{2},\left( c_{7}^{2}+c_{4}^{2}c_{6}+\omega
_{2}^{2}c_{6}^{2}\right) _{2}
\end{tabular}
\\ \hline\hline
\end{tabular}
\end{center}
Let $\tau ^{\prime }$ be the transgression in the fibration $\pi ^{\prime }$
contained in the diagram (3.8). Granted with the class $\varpi =\tau
^{\prime }(t_{0})$ determined in Lemma 4.2, as well as the results of Lemma
5.2, formula (3.17) is applicable to evaluate the derivative $\partial
P/\partial \varpi $ for $P\in S_{p}(G)$, as that presented in the following
table:
\begin{center}
\textbf{Table 5.2.} The derivative $\partial P/\partial \varpi $ for $P\in
S_{p}(G)$
\begin{tabular}{l|l}
\hline\hline
$(G,p)$ & $\left\{ \partial P/\partial \varpi \mid P\in S_{p}(G)\right\} $
\\ \hline
$(SU(n),p)$ & $\left( \binom{n}{k}\omega _{1}^{k-1}\right) _{p}$, $2\leq
k\leq n$ \\ \hline
$(Sp(n),2)$ & $\left( \binom{n}{k}\omega _{1}^{2k-1}\right) _{2}$, $1\leq
k\leq n$ \\ \hline
$(E_{6},3)$ & $0,0,0,0,0,\left( \omega _{1}^{8}\right) _{3}$ \\ \hline
$(E_{7},2)$ & $\left( \omega _{2}\right) _{2},\left( \omega _{2}^{2}\right)
_{2},0,0,{0,}0,\left( \omega _{2}^{13}\right) _{2}$ \\ \hline\hline
\end{tabular
.
\end{center}
\noindent Consequently, one obtains $\theta _{1}(\varphi _{p}(P))\in
E_{3}^{\ast ,0}(PG;\mathbb{F}_{p})$, $P\in S_{p}(G)$, as that stated in the
formula (4.5).
By the algorithm given in the proof of Lemma 3.11, for each $P\in S_{p}(G)$
with $\theta _{1}(\varphi _{p}(P))=0$ one can construct a polynomial
P^{\prime }\in \left\langle \func{Im}\widetilde{\tau }_{p}\right\rangle \cap
\ker f_{p}$ satisfying the relation $C^{\ast }(\varphi _{p}(P^{\prime
}))=\varphi _{p}(P)$. Explicitly, a set $S_{p}(PG)$ of the polynomials
P^{\prime }$ so obtained is given in the following table:
\begin{center}
\textbf{Table 5.3.} A set $S_{p}(PG)$ of primary characteristic polynomials
over $\mathbb{F}_{p}$
\begin{tabular}{l|l}
\hline\hline
$(G,p)$ & $S_{p}(PG)\subset \left\langle \func{Im}\widetilde{\tau
_{p}\right\rangle \cap \ker f_{p}$ \\ \hline
$(SU(n),p)$ &
\begin{tabular}{l}
$\left( c_{k}\right) _{p}$ for $2\leq k<p^{r}$, $(c_{k}-t_{n,k}c_{p^{r}
\omega _{1}^{k-p^{r}})_{p}$ for $k\geq p^{r}$ \\
where $n=p^{r}n^{\prime }$ with $(n\prime ,p)=1$
\end{tabular}
\\ \hline
$(Sp(n),2)$ &
\begin{tabular}{l}
$\left( c_{2k}\right) _{2}$ for $2\leq k<2^{r}$, $(c_{2k}-t_{n,2}c_{2^{r+1}
\omega _{1}^{2(k-2^{r})})_{2}$ for $k\geq 2^{r}$ \\
where $n=2^{r}(2b+1)$
\end{tabular}
\\ \hline
$(E_{6},3)$ &
\begin{tabular}{l}
$\left( \omega _{2}^{2}-c_{2}\right) _{3},\left( c_{2}^{2}-c_{4}\right)
_{3},\left( c_{5}+c_{2}c_{3}\right) _{3},$ \\
$\left( c_{6}-c_{2}c_{4}-c_{3}^{2}\right) _{3},\left(
-c_{3}c_{5}-c_{2}c_{6}\right) _{3}$
\end{tabular
$ \\ \hline
$(E_{7},2)$ &
\begin{tabular}{l}
$\left( c_{3}-c_{2}\omega _{2}\right) _{2},\left( c_{5}+\omega
_{2}c_{4}\right) _{2},\left( c_{4}^{2}+\omega _{2}^{2}c_{6}+\omega
_{2}^{3}c_{5}+\omega _{2}^{8}\right) _{2}$ \\
$\left( \omega _{2}^{2}c_{7}+\omega _{2}^{3}c_{6}\right) _{2},\left(
c_{6}^{2}+c_{4}^{3}\right) _{2},\left( c_{7}^{2}+c_{4}^{2}c_{6}+\omega
_{2}^{2}c_{6}^{2}-c_{2}\omega _{2}^{12}\right) _{2}
\end{tabular}
\\ \hline\hline
\end{tabular}
\end{center}
\noindent where $t_{n,k}>0$ is an integer with $t_{n,k}\binom{n}{p^{r}
\equiv \binom{n}{k}\func{mod}p$.
By formula (4.7) the cohomology $H^{\ast }(PG;\mathbb{F}_{p})$ has the
presentation
\begin{enumerate}
\item[(5.2)] $H^{\ast }(PG;\mathbb{F}_{p})=\pi ^{\ast }E_{3}^{\ast ,0}(PG
\mathbb{F}_{p})\otimes \Delta (\iota ,\zeta _{2\deg P-1})_{P\in S_{p}(PG)}$,
\end{enumerate}
\noindent where $\zeta _{2\deg P-1}=\kappa \circ \varphi _{p}(P)$, $P\in
S_{p}(PG)$. In the statement and the proof of the following result, we note
by the proof of Lemma 3.7 that, with $\zeta _{2\deg P-1}\in \func{Im}\kappa
,
\begin{enumerate}
\item[(5.3)] $\beta _{p}(\zeta _{2\deg P-1})\in \pi ^{\ast }(E_{3}^{\ast
,0}(PG))\subset H^{\ast }(PG)$,
\end{enumerate}
\noindent where the ring $E_{3}^{\ast ,0}(PG)$ has been determined by (4.2).
\bigskip
\noindent \textbf{Lemma 5.3. }\textsl{With respect to (5.2)}\textbf{\
\textsl{the Bockstein} $\beta _{p}:H^{\ast }(PG;\mathbb{F}_{p})\rightarrow
H^{\ast }(PG)$ \textsl{satisfies that}
\begin{quote}
\textsl{i) for }$(G,p)=(SU(n),p)$\textsl{\ with }$n=p^{r}n^{\prime }$,
(n\prime ,p)=1$
$\qquad \beta _{p}(\zeta _{2s-1})=-p^{r-t-1}\omega ^{p^{t}}$ \textsl{if}
s=p^{t}$ \textsl{with} $t<r$\textsl{,} $0$ \textsl{otherwise;}
\textsl{ii) for }$(G,p)=(Sp(n),2)$\textsl{\ with }$n=2^{r}(2b+1)$\textsl{:}
$\qquad \beta _{2}(\zeta _{4s-1})=\omega ^{2^{r}}$ \textsl{if} $s=2^{r-1}
\textsl{,} $0$ \textsl{if} $s\neq 2^{r-1}$\textsl{;}
\textsl{iii) for }$(G,p)=(E_{6},3)$\textsl{\ and in the order of }
s=2,4,5,6,8$
$\qquad \beta _{3}(\zeta _{2s-1})=0,-x_{4},0,0,-x_{4}^{2}$\textsl{;}
\textsl{iv) for }$(G,p)=(E_{7},2)$\textsl{\ and in the order of }
s=3,5,8,9,12,14$
$\qquad \beta _{2}(\zeta
_{2s-1})=x_{3},x_{5},x_{3}x_{5},x_{9},x_{3}x_{9},x_{5}x_{9}.$
\end{quote}
\noindent \textbf{Proof. }For the case $(SU(n),p)$ with $n=p^{r}n^{\prime }$
and $(n\prime ,p)=1$ (resp. $(Sp(n),2)$ with $n=2^{r}(2b+1)$), one has by
(5.3) that
\begin{quote}
$\beta _{p}(\zeta _{2s-1})\in \mathbb{Z}[\omega ]^{+}/\left\langle
p^{r}\omega ,p^{r-1}\omega ^{p},\cdots ,\omega ^{p^{r}}\right\rangle $
(resp. $\beta _{2}(\zeta _{4s-1})\in \mathbb{Z}[\omega ]/\left\langle
2\omega ,\omega ^{2^{r+1}}\right\rangle $),
\end{quote}
\noindent where $\omega =\pi ^{\ast }(\omega _{1})$ (see iii) of Theorem
3.9). By the degree reason one gets
\begin{quote}
$\beta _{p}(\zeta _{2s-1})=0$ if $s\geq p^{r}$ (resp. $\beta _{2}(\zeta
_{4s-1})=0$ if $s\geq 2^{r}$).
\end{quote}
\noindent In the remaining cases $2\leq s<p^{r}$ (resp. $1\leq s<2^{r}$) an
integral lift of the characteristic polynomial $\left( c_{s}\right) _{p}$
(resp. $\left( c_{2s}\right) _{2}$) of the class $\zeta _{2s-1}$ (resp.
\zeta _{4s-1}$) is easily seen to be
\begin{quote}
$c_{s}-$ $\binom{n}{s}\omega _{1}^{s}\in \left\langle \func{Im}\widetilde
\tau }\right\rangle $ (resp. $c_{2s}-$ $\binom{n}{k}\omega _{1}^{2s}\in
\left\langle \func{Im}\widetilde{\tau }\right\rangle $).
\end{quote}
\noindent The formula in Lemma 3.7 then yields that
\begin{quote}
$\beta _{p}(\zeta _{2s-1})=\pi ^{\ast }\frac{1}{p}f(c_{s}-\binom{n}{s}\omega
_{1}^{s})=\pi ^{\ast }(-\frac{1}{p}\binom{n}{s}\omega _{1}^{s})=-\frac{1}{p
\binom{n}{s}\omega ^{s}$
(resp. $\beta _{2}(\zeta _{4s-1})=\pi ^{\ast }(\frac{1}{2}f(c_{2s}-\binom{n}
s}\omega _{1}^{2s})=\pi ^{\ast }(\frac{1}{2}\binom{n}{s}\omega _{1}^{2s})
\frac{1}{2}\binom{n}{s}\omega ^{2s}$),
\end{quote}
\noindent where the second equality follows from $f(c_{s})=0$ (resp.
f(c_{2s})=0$) by i) (resp. ii)) of Theorem 5.1. The relation i) (resp. ii))
of the present lemma comes now from $p^{r-t}\omega ^{p^{t}}=0$, $0\leq t\leq
r$ (resp. $2\omega ,\omega ^{2^{r+1}}=0$), and the property (5.6) of the
binomial coefficients $\binom{n}{s}$.
Turning to the cases $(G,p)=(E_{6},3)$ or $(E_{7},2)$ for each $P=(H)_{p}\in
S_{p}(PG)$ given by Table 5.3 the enclosed polynomial $H$ satisfies $H\in
\left\langle \func{Im}\widetilde{\tau }\right\rangle $ by the relation c) or
d) of Lemma 5.2. Therefore, by Lemma 3.7
\begin{quote}
$\beta _{p}(\zeta _{2\deg P-1})=\pi ^{\ast }(\frac{1}{p}f(H)\mid _{\tau
(t_{1})=\cdots =\tau (t_{n})=0})$.
\end{quote}
\noindent This formula, together with the relations $R_{i}$'s in the
presentations iii) and iv) of Theorem 5.1, suffices to yield the results in
iii) and iv). As examples, when $(G,p)=(E_{6},3)$ it gives rise to
\begin{quote}
$\beta _{3}(\zeta _{3})=\pi ^{\ast }\frac{\omega _{2}^{2}-c_{2}}{3}=\pi
^{\ast }\omega _{2}^{2}=0$;
$\beta _{3}(\zeta _{7})=\pi ^{\ast }\frac{c_{2}^{2}-c_{4}}{3}=\pi ^{\ast
}(5\omega _{2}^{2}-x_{4})=-x_{4}$;
$\beta _{3}(\zeta _{9})=\pi ^{\ast }\frac{c_{5}+c_{2}c_{3}}{3}=\pi ^{\ast
}(\omega _{2}^{5}+\omega _{2}x_{4}+\omega _{2}^{2}c_{3})=0$;
$\beta _{3}(\zeta _{11})=\pi ^{\ast }\frac{c_{2}c_{4}+c_{3}^{2}-c_{6}}{3
=\pi ^{\ast }(5\omega _{2}^{2}x_{4}+\omega _{2}^{6}+\omega _{2}c_{5}+\omega
_{2}^{3}c_{3}-3c_{6})=0$;
$\beta _{3}(\zeta _{15})=\pi ^{\ast }(-\frac{c_{3}c_{5}+c_{2}c_{6}}{3})=\pi
^{\ast }(-4x_{4}^{2}+c_{3}c_{5}+4\omega _{2}^{3}c_{5})=-x_{4}^{2}$,
\end{quote}
\noindent where, in each of the above equations, the second equality is
deduced from the relations $R_{i}$'s in iii) of Theorem 5.1, where the last
one is obtained by the formula c) of Lemma 5.2.$\square $
\bigskip
For $G=SU(n),Sp(n),E_{6}$ or $E_{7}$ consider the fibration $G/T\overset
\psi }{\hookrightarrow }BT\overset{Bi}{\rightarrow }BG$ induced by the
inclusion $i:T\rightarrow G$ of a maximal torus $T$, see (3.6). It was shown
in \cite[Lemma 5.4]{DZ3} that there exists a complex bundle $\xi $ on $BT$
so that
\begin{quote}
$C(\xi )=1+c_{1}+c_{2}+\cdots $ for $G=SU(n),E_{6}$ or $E_{7}$;
$P(\xi )=1+c_{2}+c_{4}+\cdots $ for $G=Sp(n)$,
\end{quote}
\noindent where $C(\xi )$ and $P(\xi )$ are the total Chern class and the
total Pontrjagin class of $\xi $, respectively. It follows from the
Wu--formula \cite[p.94]{MS} that the following relation holds on the ring
H^{\ast }(BT;\mathbb{F}_{2})$
\begin{enumerate}
\item[(5.4)] $Sq^{2s-2}c_{s}=c_{s-1}c_{s}+c_{s-2}c_{s+1}+\cdots +c_{2s-1}$
for $G=SU(n),E_{6}$ or $E_{7}$;
$Sq^{4s-2}c_{2s}=c_{2s-2}c_{2s}+c_{2s-4}c_{2s+2}+\cdots +c_{4s-2}$ for
G=Sp(n)$.
\end{enumerate}
\noindent \textbf{Lemma 5.4.} \textsl{With respect to the presentation (5.2)}
\textsl{the Steenrod operators }$\delta _{2}$ \textsl{and} $Sq^{2r}$ \textsl
on} $H^{\ast }(PG;\mathbb{F}_{p})$ \textsl{satisfy the following relations}
\begin{quote}
\textsl{i) }$G=SU(n)$\textsl{\ with }$n=2^{r}(2b+1):$
$\quad \delta _{2}\zeta _{2s-1}=\omega _{1}^{2^{r-1}}$ \textsl{if}
s=2^{r-1} $, $0$ \textsl{if} $s\neq 2^{r-1}$\textsl{; }
$\quad Sq^{2s-2}\zeta _{2s-1}=\zeta _{4s-3}$ \textsl{for }$2s-1\leq 2^{r-1}
\textsl{;}
\textsl{ii) }$G=Sp(n)$\textsl{\ with }$n=2^{r}(2b+1):$
$\quad \delta _{2}\zeta _{4s-1}=\omega _{1}^{2^{r}}$ \textsl{if} $s=2^{r-1}
, $0$ \textsl{if} $s\neq 2^{r-1}$\textsl{, }
$\quad Sq^{4s-2}\zeta _{4s-1}=\zeta _{8s-3}$\textsl{\ for }$4s-1\leq 2^{r}$;
\textsl{iii) }$G=E_{7}$\textsl{\ and in accordance to} $s=3,5,8,9,12,1
\QTR{sl}{:}$
$\quad \delta _{2}\zeta
_{2s-1}=y_{3},y_{5},y_{3}y_{5},y_{9},y_{3}y_{9},y_{5}y_{9}$\textsl{; }
Sq^{2s-2}\zeta _{2s-1}=\zeta _{9},\zeta _{17},0,0,0,0.$
\end{quote}
\noindent \textbf{Proof.} The results on $\delta _{2}\zeta _{2s-1}$ comes
directly from the relation $\delta _{2}=r_{2}\circ \beta _{2}$, in which the
action of $\beta _{2}$ on $\zeta _{2s-1}$ has been decided in Lemma 5.3,
while the reduction $r_{2}$ is transparent in view of the presentations of
the rings $E_{3}^{\ast ,0}(PG)$ and $E_{3}^{\ast ,0}(PG;\mathbb{F}_{2})$ in
(4.2) and Lemma 4.3.
For $G=SU(n)$\textsl{\ }(resp. $Sp(n)$) with\textsl{\ }$n=2^{r}(2b+1)$ we
get from Lemma 3.8 and the formula (5.4) that
\begin{quote}
$Sq^{2s-2}\zeta _{2s-1}=\kappa \varphi _{2}(Sq^{2s-2}c_{s})=\kappa \varphi
_{2}(c_{2s-1})=\zeta _{4s-3}$
(resp. $Sq^{4s-2}\zeta _{4s-1}=\varphi _{2}(Sq^{4s-2}c_{2s})=\varphi
_{2}(c_{4s-2})=\zeta _{4s-3}$),
\end{quote}
\noindent where $2s-1\leq 2^{r-1}$ (resp. $4s-1\leq 2^{r}$), the second
equality comes from $\varphi _{2}(c_{s-1-t}c_{s+t})=0$ for all $0\leq t\leq
s-2$ by Lemma 3.4, and where the last equality follows from the fact that,
with $2s-1<2^{r-1}$, $c_{2s-1}$ is a characteristic polynomial of the class
\zeta _{4s-3}\in H^{\ast }(PSU(n);\mathbb{F}_{2})$, see Table (5.3). This
completes the proof of i) (resp. ii)).
Finally, for the case $G=E_{7}$, granted with the set $S_{2}(PE_{7})$ of
explicitly polynomials given by Table 5.3 and the Wu--formula (5.4), it is
straightforward to show the formulae in iii) by the method entailed above.
Alternatively, see \cite[Section 5.2]{DZ3} for the relevant computation.
\square $
\subsection{The integral characteristic polynomials}
In view of the presentation of the rings $H^{\ast }(G/T)$ in Theorem 5.1,
one formulates the set $S(G)$ of\textsl{\ }characteristic\textsl{\
polynomials for the $1$--connected groups $G=SU(n),Sp(n),E_{6},E_{7}$ (see
Example 3.6) as that tabulated below
\begin{center}
\textbf{Table 5.4.} The set $S(G)$ of primary characteristic polynomials
over $\mathbb{Z}$
\begin{tabular}{l|l}
\hline\hline
$G$ & $S(G)$ \\ \hline
$SU(n)$ & $c_{k},2\leq k\leq n$ \\ \hline
$Sp(n)$ & $c_{2k},1\leq k\leq n$ \\ \hline
$E_{6}$ & $R_{2},R_{5},2R_{6}-x_{3}R_{3},R_{8},R_{9},3R_{12}-x_{4}^{2}R_{4}$
\\ \hline
$E_{7}$ &
R_{2},2R_{6}-x_{3}R_{3},R_{8},2R_{10}-x_{5}R_{5},3R_{12}-x_{4}^{2}R_{4},R_{14},2R_{18}-x_{9}R_{9}
$ \\ \hline\hline
\end{tabular}
\end{center}
\noindent In (4.9), (4.17a) and (4.17b), the rings $H^{\ast }(G)$ are
presented by the primary $1$--forms $\gamma _{2\deg P-1}:=\kappa \varphi
(P)\in E_{3}^{\ast ,1}(G)$ with $P\in S(G)$.
Let $\tau ^{\prime }$ be the transgression in the fibration $\pi ^{\prime }$
in the diagram (3.8). Granted with the class $\varpi =\tau ^{\prime }(t_{0})$
determined by Lemma 4.2, as well as the results of Lemma 5.2, formula (3.17)
is ready to apply to evaluate the derivation $\partial P/\partial \varpi $
for $P\in S(G)$. The results are so obtained presented in the following
table.
\begin{center}
\textbf{Table 5.5.} The derivation $\partial P/\partial \varpi $ for $P\in
S(G)$
\begin{tabular}{l|l}
\hline\hline
$G$ & $\left\{ \partial P/\partial \varpi \mid P\in S(G)\right\} $ \\ \hline
$SU(n)$ & $\binom{n}{s}\omega _{1}^{s-1}$, $2\leq s\leq n$ \\ \hline
$Sp(n)$ & $\binom{n}{s}\omega _{1}^{2s-1},$ $1\leq s\leq n$ \\ \hline
$E_{6}$ & $0,0,0,0,\omega _{1}^{8},0$ \\ \hline
$E_{7}$ & $\omega _{2},\omega _{2}^{2}y_{3},\omega _{2}^{2}y_{5},0,\omega
_{2}^{2}(y_{9}+y_{4}y_{5}+y_{4}\omega _{2}^{5}),\omega _{2}^{9}(y_{4}+\omega
_{2}^{4}),0$ \\ \hline\hline
\end{tabular}
\end{center}
\subsection{Arithmetic properties of binomial coefficients}
We begin with a brief account for three arithmetic properties of the
binomial coefficients $\binom{n}{k}=\frac{n!}{k!(n-k)!}$ which are required
by computing with cohomology of the adjoint Lie group $PSU(n)$, where $1\leq
k\leq n$.
Consider $b_{n,k}=g.c.d.\{\binom{n}{1},\cdots ,\binom{n}{k}\}$, $1\leq k\leq
n$. Since $b_{n,k+1}\mid b_{n,k}$ with $b_{n,1}=n,b_{n,n}=1$ one defines the
integers $a_{n,k}:=\frac{b_{n,k-1}}{b_{n,k}}$, $k\geq 2$. The following
result has been shown in \cite{DLin}, and is required by proving i) of Lemma
4.6.
\begin{enumerate}
\item[(5.5)] If $n>2$ is an integer with the prime factorization
n=p_{1}^{r_{1}}\cdots p_{t}^{r_{t}}$, then $a_{n,k}=p_{i}$ or $1$ in
accordance to $k\in Q_{p_{i}}(n)$ or $k\in Q_{0}(n)$, where $1\leq i\leq t$.
\end{enumerate}
For an integer $m$ denote by $ord_{p}m$ the biggest integer $a$ so that $m$
is divisible by the power $p^{a}$. The following result is needed by proving
i) of Lemma 5.3. Assume that $n=p^{r}n^{\prime }$ with $(n\prime ,p)=1$.
\begin{enumerate}
\item[(5.6)] For any $p^{t}\leq s<p^{t+1}$ with $t+1<r$ one has $ord_{p
\binom{n}{s}\geq r-t$, while the equality holds iff $s=p^{t}$.
\end{enumerate}
The remaining part of this section is devoted to a proof of Proposition 4.8.
The calculation will be based on the following result
\begin{enumerate}
\item[(5.7)] For any $1\leq s\leq r$\ there is a sequence $\{h_{1},\cdots
,h_{s}\}$\ of integers such that
$\quad \binom{p^{r}}{p^{s}}-p^{r-s}=h_{1}\binom{p^{r}}{p^{s-1}}+h_{2}\binom
p^{r}}{p^{s-2}}+\cdots +h_{s}\binom{p^{r}}{1}$.
\end{enumerate}
The center of the special unitary group $SU(n)$ is the cyclic group $\mathbb
Z}_{n}$ generated by the diagonal matrix $diag\{e^{\frac{2\pi }{n}i},\cdots
,e^{\frac{2\pi }{n}i}\}\in SU(n)$. The total space of the circle bundle $C$
on $PSU(n)$ (see (1.4)) is the unitary group $U(n)$, whose maximal torus $T$
is $\{diag\{e^{i\theta _{1}},\cdots ,e^{i\theta _{n}}\}\mid $ $\theta
_{i}\in \lbrack 0,2\pi ]\}$. In the terminologies of Section 3.4 we can
furnish the group $H^{1}(T)$ with the basis $\left\{ t_{1},\cdots
,t_{n-1},t_{0}\right\} $ in which the subset $\left\{ t_{1},\cdots
,t_{n-1}\right\} $ corresponds to a set of fundamental dominant weights of
the group $PSU(n)$. Consequently, in the short exact sequence (3.9)
associated to the bundle $C$
\begin{quote}
$0\rightarrow E_{2}^{\ast ,k}(PSU(n))\overset{C^{\ast }}{\rightarrow
E_{2}^{\ast ,k}(U(n))\overset{\overline{\theta }}{\rightarrow }E_{2}^{\ast
,k-1}(PSU(n))\rightarrow 0$
\end{quote}
\noindent one has
\begin{quote}
$E_{{\small 2}}^{{\small \ast ,k}}(PSU(n))=H^{\ast }(\frac{{\small U(n)}}{T
)\otimes \Lambda (t_{{\small 1}},\cdots ,t_{{\small n-1}})$;
(resp. $E_{2}^{\ast ,k}(U(n))=H^{\ast }(\frac{{\small U(n)}}{T})\otimes
\Lambda (t_{1},\cdots ,t_{n-1},t_{0})$),
\end{quote}
\noindent while by ii) of Remark2.5 the $d_{2}$ actions on $E_{{\small 2}}^
{\small \ast ,k}}$ are determined by
\begin{quote}
$\tau (t_{{\small 1}})=2\omega _{1}-\omega _{2};\tau (t_{{\small 2
})=-\omega _{1}+2\omega _{2}-\omega _{3};\cdots ;$
$\tau (t_{{\small n-1}})=-\omega _{n-2}+2\omega _{n-1}$ and $\tau ^{\prime
}(t_{{\small 0}})=\omega _{1}$
\end{quote}
\noindent where $\tau $ and $\tau ^{\prime }$ are the transgression in $\pi $
and $\pi ^{\prime }$ (see in the diagram (3.8)), respectively. It follows
that if $\left\{ c_{2},\cdots ,c_{n}\right\} $ is the set of primary
characteristic polynomials for the group $SU(n)$ over $\mathbb{Z}$ given by
Table 5.4, then
\begin{quote}
$H^{\ast }(U(n))=E_{3}^{\ast ,\ast }(U(n))=\Lambda (\gamma _{1},\gamma
_{3},\cdots ,\gamma _{2n-1})$,
\end{quote}
\noindent where, in terms of Lemmas 3.2 and 3.3,
\begin{quote}
$\gamma _{1}=-(n-1)\otimes t_{1}-(n-2)\otimes t_{2}-\cdots -1\otimes
t_{n-1}+n\otimes t_{0}$,
$\gamma _{2r-1}=\left[ \widetilde{c}_{r}\right] $.
\end{quote}
\noindent In the following result we assume that $n=p^{r}$ with $p$ a prime.
\bigskip
\noindent \textbf{Lemma 5.5.} \textsl{For each} $p^{s}\in Q_{p}(n)$ \textsl
the class }$\gamma _{2p^{s}-1}$\textsl{\ has a characteristic polynomial of
the form }$\alpha _{p^{s}}+p^{r-s}\omega _{1}^{p^{s}}$\textsl{\ with }
\alpha _{p^{s}}\in \left\langle \func{Im}\widetilde{\tau }\right\rangle
\textsl{. As results}
\begin{quote}
\textsl{i) }$\gamma _{2p^{s}-1}=\left[ \widetilde{\alpha
_{p^{s}}+p^{r-s}\omega _{1}^{p^{s}-1}\otimes t_{0}\right] $\textsl{\ with}
\widetilde{\alpha }_{p^{s}}\in E_{2}^{\ast ,1}(PSU(n));$
\textsl{ii)} $d_{2}(\widetilde{\alpha }_{p^{s}})=-p^{r-s}\omega _{1}^{p^{s}}
.
\end{quote}
\noindent \textbf{Proof.} For a given $p^{s}\in Q_{p}(n)$ let
\{h_{1},\cdots ,h_{s}\}$ be the sequence of integers satisfying (5.7).
Consider the polynomial
\begin{quote}
$\alpha _{p^{s}}=c_{p^{s}}-h_{1}\omega ^{p^{s}-p^{s-1}}c_{p^{s-1}}-\cdots
-h_{s}\omega ^{p^{s}-1}c_{1}-p^{r-s}\omega _{1}^{p^{s}}\in \mathbb{Z}[\omega
_{1},\cdots ,\omega _{n-1}]$
\end{quote}
\noindent From $\alpha _{p^{s}}\mid _{\tau (t_{1})=\cdots =\tau (t_{n-1})=
\QTR{sl}{\ }}=0$ by (5.7) and a) of Lemma 5.2 one finds that $\alpha
_{p^{s}}\in \left\langle \func{Im}\widetilde{\tau }\right\rangle $.
Moreover, with respect to the surjection
\begin{quote}
$f:$ $\mathbb{Z}\left[ \omega _{1},\cdots ,\omega _{n-1}\right] \rightarrow
H^{\ast }(U(n)/T)${\small \ }(see Section 3.2)
\end{quote}
\noindent the polynomial $\alpha _{p^{s}}+p^{r-s}\omega _{1}^{p^{2}}\in
\mathbb{Z}\left[ \omega _{1},\cdots ,\omega _{n-1}\right] $ has a lift to
E_{2}^{\ast ,1}(U(n))$ (see (3.1)) with the form
\begin{center}
$\widetilde{c}_{p^{s}}-h_{1}\omega ^{p^{s}-p^{s-1}}\widetilde{c
_{p^{s-1}}-h_{2}\omega ^{p^{s}-p^{s-2}}\widetilde{c}_{p^{s-2}}-\cdots
-h_{s}\omega ^{p^{s}-1}\widetilde{c}_{1}$
$=\widetilde{c}_{p^{s}}-d_{2}(h_{1}\omega ^{p^{s}-p^{s-1}-1}\widetilde{c
_{p^{s-1}}+h_{2}\omega ^{p^{s}-p^{s-2}-1}\widetilde{c}_{p^{s-2}}+\cdots
+h_{s}\omega ^{p^{s}-2}\widetilde{c}_{1})\otimes t_{0})$.
\end{center}
\noindent These shows that $\gamma _{2p^{s}-1}=\left[ \widetilde{\alpha
_{p^{s}}+p^{r-s}\omega _{1}^{p^{s}-1}\otimes t_{0}\right] $\textsl{\ }with
\widetilde{\alpha }_{p^{s}}\in E_{2}^{\ast ,1}(PSU(n))$.$\square $
\bigskip
By ii) of Lemma 5.5 the $1$--forms $p\cdot \widetilde{\alpha
_{p^{s}}-\omega ^{p^{s}-p^{s-1}}\widetilde{\alpha }_{p^{s-1}}\in E_{2}^{\ast
,1}(PSU(n))$ with $1\leq s\leq r$ are $d_{2}$ closed and therefore, define
the cohomology classes
\begin{enumerate}
\item[(5.8)] $\rho _{2p^{s}-1}:=\left[ p\widetilde{\alpha }_{p^{s}}-\omega
^{p^{s}-p^{s-1}}\widetilde{\alpha }_{p^{s-1}}\right] \in E_{3}^{\ast
,1}(PSU(n))$, $1\leq s\leq r$.
\end{enumerate}
\noindent Moreover, the computation
\begin{quote}
$C^{\ast }(\rho _{2p^{s}-1})-p\cdot \gamma _{2p^{s}-1}$
$=\left[ p\widetilde{\alpha }_{p^{s}}-\omega ^{p^{s}-p^{s-1}}\widetilde
\alpha }_{p^{s-1}}]-[p\widetilde{\alpha }_{p^{s}}+p^{r-s+1}\omega
_{1}^{p^{s}-1}\otimes t_{0}\right] $
$=\left[ -\omega ^{p^{s}-p^{s-1}}\widetilde{\alpha }_{p^{s-1}}-p^{r-s+1
\omega _{1}^{p^{s}-1}\otimes t_{0}\right] $
$=\left[ d_{2}(-\omega ^{p^{s}-p^{s-1}-1}\widetilde{\alpha
_{p^{s-1}}\otimes t_{0})\right] =0$
\end{quote}
\noindent indicates that $C^{\ast }(\rho _{2p^{s}-1})=p\cdot \gamma
_{2p^{s}-1}$, where the second equality comes from i) of Lemma 5.5, while
the fourth one follows from ii) of Lemma 5.5 and $d_{2}(t_{0})=\omega _{1}$.
Granted with the classes $\rho _{2p^{s}-1}$\ ($1\leq s\leq r$) defined by
(5.8) we are ready to show Proposition 4.8.
\bigskip
\noindent \textbf{Proof of Proposition 4.8.} In term of the formulae (4.9)
and (4.3) of the rings $H^{\ast }(U(n))$ and $H^{\ast }(U(n);\mathbb{F}_{p})$
the reduction $r_{p}$ on $H^{\ast }(U(n))$ satisfies the relation
r_{p}(\gamma _{I})=\xi _{I}$. Moreover, if $I=(p^{i_{1}},\cdots
,p^{i_{k}})\in Q_{p}(n)$\textsl{\ }with\textsl{\ }$1\leq i_{1}<\cdots
<i_{k}<r$ one has $\theta (\xi _{I})=0$ by (4.5). The commutative diagram
induced by $r_{p}$
\begin{quote}
\begin{tabular}{lll}
$H^{\ast }(U(n))$ & $\overset{\theta }{\rightarrow }$ & $H^{\ast }(PSU(n))$
\\
$r_{p}\downarrow $ & & $\allowbreak r_{p}\downarrow $ \\
$H^{\ast }(U(n);\mathbb{F}_{p})$ & $\overset{\theta }{\rightarrow }$ &
H^{\ast }(PSU(n);\mathbb{F}_{p})
\end{tabular
.
\end{quote}
\noindent now concludes that $\allowbreak r_{p}(\theta (\gamma _{I}))=0$.
This shows assertion i) of Proposition 4.8.
With $\gamma _{2p^{s}-1}=\left[ \widetilde{\alpha }_{p^{s}}+p^{r-s}\omega
_{1}^{p^{s}-1}\otimes t_{0}\right] $ by i) of Lemma 5.5 one gets by (3.10)
that
\begin{quote}
$\theta (\gamma _{2p^{s}-1})=\left[ \overline{\theta }(\widetilde{\alpha
_{p^{s}}+p^{r-s}\omega _{1}^{p^{s}-1}\otimes t_{0})\right] =p^{r-s}\omega
^{p^{s}-1}$,
\end{quote}
\noindent where we have made use of the relations $\omega _{1}=\varpi $ by
Lemma 4.2, and $\pi ^{\ast }(\varpi )=\omega $ by iii) of Theorem 3.9. This
shows formula ii) of Proposition 4.8.
Finally, for the formula iii) of Proposition 4.8 one gets from (3.10), the
decomposition $\gamma _{I}=\gamma _{I^{e}}[\widetilde{\alpha
_{p^{i_{k}}}+p^{r-i_{k}}\omega _{1}^{p^{i_{k}}-1}\otimes t_{0}]$ by i) of
Lemma 5.5, as well as the relation $t_{0}^{2}=0$ on $E_{2}^{\ast ,\ast }$,
the following relation in $E_{3}^{\ast ,\ast }(PSU(n))$
\begin{enumerate}
\item[(5.9)] $\overline{\theta }(\gamma _{I})=\overline{\theta }(\gamma
_{I^{e}})\widetilde{a}_{p^{i_{k}}}+p^{r-i_{k}}\omega ^{p^{i_{k}}-1
\widetilde{a}_{I^{e}}$,
\end{enumerate}
\noindent where $\widetilde{a}_{K}=\underset{s\in K}{\Pi }\widetilde{a}_{s}
. Granted with the fact that the class $\overline{\theta }(\gamma _{I^{e}})$
is divisible by $p$ the formula iii) is verified by the following calculation
\begin{quote}
$\overline{\theta }(\gamma _{I})=(\frac{1}{p}\theta (\gamma _{I^{e}}))\cdot
\widetilde{a}_{p^{i_{k}}}+p^{r-i_{k}}\omega ^{p^{i_{k}}-1}\widetilde{a
_{I^{e}}$
$=\frac{1}{p}\theta (\gamma _{I^{e}})(\rho _{2p^{i_{k}}-1}+\omega
^{p^{i_{k}}-p^{i_{k}-1}}\widetilde{a}_{p^{i_{k}-1}-1})+p^{r-i_{k}}\omega
^{p^{i_{k}}-1}\widetilde{a}_{I^{e}}$ (by (5.8))
$=\frac{1}{p}\theta (\gamma _{I^{e}})\rho _{2p^{i_{k}}-1}+\frac{1}{p}\omega
^{p^{i_{k}}-p^{i_{k}-1}}(\theta (\gamma _{I^{e}})\widetilde{a
_{p^{i_{k}-1}-1}+p^{r-i_{k}+1}\omega ^{p^{i_{k}-1}-1}\widetilde{a}_{I^{e}})$
$=\frac{1}{p}\theta (\gamma _{I^{e}})\rho _{2p^{i_{k}}-1}+\frac{1}{p}\omega
^{p^{i_{k}}-p^{i_{k}-1}}\theta (\gamma _{I^{\partial }})$ (by (5.9)).
\square $
\end{quote}
|
\section{Introduction}
Astronomical masers such as H$_{2}$O and SiO are unique tools for studying mass-loss activities in high mass star formation.
These maser species are basically excited in strong shocks on a working surface between a protostellar outflow and a dense envelope (e.g., \cite{Furuya2000}; \cite{Moscadelli2000}).
The masers allow us to directly observe an intrinsic outflow driven by individual High Mass Young Stellar Objects (HMYSOs) within 10$^{3}$ AU scale, minimizing any contamination from a mass entrainment and/or outflows driven by nearby cluster members.
Outflow properties such as size, velocity and morphology, predicted from interferometric maser studies vary source to source, e.g.,
collimated jet (\cite{Shepherd2004}), disk wind (\cite{Matthews2010}; \cite{Greenhill2013}), wide angle outflow (\cite{Motogi2008}), expanding shell (\cite{Torrelles2003}; \cite{Kim2013};\cite{Surcis2014}), equatorial outflow (\cite{Trinidad2007}) or combination of jet and wide angle outflow (\cite{Torrelles2011}).
Such divergences are possibly related to a number of factors such as stellar mass, evolutionary stage, geometry of surrounding envelope and driving mechanism of host outflows.
\citet{Motogi2011b} (Hereafter Paper I) focused on a highly variable H$_{2}$O maser source associated with a southern HMYSO, G353.273+0.641 (Hereafter G353).
They have found two intermittent maser flares during two years, combining a frequent monitoring by Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI) and single-dish observation.
In Paper I, they proposed that such a flare activity is recurrently excited by episodic shock propagations caused by a high-velocity protostellar jet.
If this is the case, one can extract time-domain information of a jet-launching region from a maser variability,
since bright maser emission allows us easy and frequent monitoring even with a small size radio telescope.
Such a region is expected to be so small ($\sim$ a few AU or less, e.g., \cite{Machida2008}; \cite{Seifried2012}), compared to current observational resolutions.
G353 is embedded in the high mass star-forming region NGC6357.
\citet{Neckel1978} determined its photometric distance as 1.74 $\pm$ 0.31 kpc from the Sun.
Exact YSO mass is still unclear, however, association of a class II CH$_{3}$OH maser emission suggests that the source is already a high mass object (\cite{Caswell2008}, hereafter CP08).
G353 is known as the Dominant Blue-Shifted Maser (DBSM) source that is a special class of a 22 GHz H$_{2}$O maser sources (CP08).
DBSMs have a highly asymmetric spectrum, where almost all the flux is concentrated in highly blue-shifted components.
The peak line-of-sight (LOS) velocities are ranged from -60 to -45 km$^{-1}$ against the systemic velocity ($V_{\rm sys}$) of $\sim$ -5.0 km s$^{-1}$ in the case of G353,
adopted from the peak velocity of the class II CH$_{3}$OH maser emission (CP08).
CP08 proposed that DBSMs are excited by a well-collimated jet in a nearly face-on geometry.
\citet{Motogi2013} have actually detected both of a faint radio jet and an extremely high-velocity thermal SiO jet, supporting CP08.
Paper I also found a signature of maser acceleration along the LOS in two velocity components ($\sim$ -53 km s$^{-1}$ and 73 km s$^{-1}$) accompanied by a significant flare-up.
Such an acceleration was observed in both of the single-dish and VLBI data, excluding instrumental errors.
Despite a similar acceleration rate ($\sim$ -5 km s$^{-1}$ yr$^{-1}$), these two components were spatially independent.
This fact confirmed that observed acceleration was not an apparent phenomenon caused by Christmas-tree effect and/or any variation of internal structures of individual maser features,
but a real one driven by global momentum supply related to shock propagations.
In this paper, we report on further monitoring observations of the H$_{2}$O maser at 22.23508 GHz ($J_{K_{\rm a}K_{\rm c}}$ = $6_{16}$--$5_{23}$) towards G353.
We have studied variability and recurrence in spatial distributions of maser features between each flare, employing denser VLBI monitoring intervals than our previous work.
New single-dish data validated the systematic acceleration of the masers.
\section{Observations and data reduction}
\subsection{VLBI monitoring}
The VLBI monitoring was performed by the VLBI Exploration of Radio Astrometry (VERA).
Typical observing interval was $\sim$ 45 days that is roughly half of that in Paper I.
We had total 15 epochs between 2010 September to 2012 August.
All observations were made in the dual beam mode, where target and phase calibrator were observed simultaneously (\cite{Kawaguchi2000}; \cite{Honma2003}).
Total on-source time was $\sim$ 5 hours in each epoch.
The phase tracking center for G353 was ($\alpha$,$\delta$)$_{\rm J2000.0}$ = (\timeform{17h26m01.59s}, \timeform{-34D15'14.9"}).
We used a bright quasar, J1717-3342 ($\sim$ 700 mJy) for the dual-beam phase referencing.
The separation angle between G353 and J1717-3342 is \timeform{1D.83} with a position angle of -\timeform{108D}.
NRAO530 and/or PKS1510-089 was observed once per hour for delay and bandpass calibration.
Antenna gains were corrected based on measured system noise temperatures ($T_{\rm sys}$) of each stations.
Typical $T_{\rm sys}$ are ranged 200 -- 400 K for Mizusawa and Iriki stations and 400 -- 800 K for Ogasawara and Ishigaki stations.
Details of backends and correlation processes were already described in Paper I.
We observed single left-hand circular polarization with a data rate of 1024 Mb s$^{-1}$ (2 bit, 512 MHz sampling).
The total bandwidth was 240 MHz (16 MHz $\times$ 15 IF) for calibrators and 16 MHz (1 IF) for G353.
We cut out an 8-MHz sub-IF from the maser IF and divided it into 512 spectral channels in initial two epochs, as it was in Paper I.
The total velocity coverage is 108 km s$^{-1}$ with spectral resolution of 0.21 km s$^{-1}$.
On the other hand, we used two 8-MHz sub-IFs in latter 13 epochs, in order to cover a larger velocity range in G353.
Central frequencies of these sub-IFs are separated 4 MHz, as both including maser emission peaks.
This gives a velocity coverage of 162 km s$^{-1}$ with the same spectral resolution.
Data reduction was carried out in the standard reduction procedure for VERA data (see \cite{Motogi2011a}),
using the Astronomical Imaging Processing System (AIPS) package developed by National Radio Astronomy Observatory (NRAO).
\footnote{The National Radio Astronomy Observatory is a facility of the National Science Foundation operated under cooperative agreement by Associated Universities, Inc.}
We first determined an astrometric frame in each epoch from phase-referenced positions of bright maser spots with respect to J1717-3342, and then, fringe-fitting and self-calibration were performed using the brightest maser channel in each epoch.
We finally searched all maser spots from the self-calibrated data cube with a detection limit of 6 $\sigma$.
Searched area was \timeform{1.5"}$\times$\timeform{1.5"} from the phase tracking center.
An interval of phase solution was $\sim$2 min for a fringe-fitting using J1717-3342, and down to 15 sec in final self-calibration.
Only a maser emission that appeared in successive three or more spectral channels in at least one observing epoch was treated as a real detection.
Each set of spatially successive maser spots was defined as a 'maser feature' that means individual gas clump, showing a single-peaked velocity profile.
Velocities and positions of each feature were determined by the flux-weighted averaging.
We included thermal image noises, baseline solution errors and tropospheric zenith delay residuals as astrometric error sources.
The third term was estimated within a typical range of $\pm$ 3 cm, by the image-optimization method \citep{Honma2008}.
This estimation, however, seemed to be incomplete in some epochs, since image dynamic ranges were still limited even after the correction.
We deduced overall errors of the image optimization, using two distinct sub-IF data which were available in most epochs.
We analyzed each dataset independently and compared astrometric positions of maser spots detected in both data.
These positions were basically consistent within an error of thermal image noises, but some epochs show a significant positional offset up to 3 milli-arcsecond (mas).
To be conservative, we included it in total astrometric errors as a systematic error of our analysis, since frequency difference of only 4 MHz is unlikely to cause such a large offset.
The relative positional accuracies in the self-calibrated data, which were dominated by thermal image noises, are better than 0.03 and 0.1 mas for the right ascension and declination, respectively.
Table \ref{tab:obs} summarizes all VERA observations including that reported in Paper I.
We note that all tables in this paper are presented in Appendix section.
It contains observing dates, synthesized beams ($\theta_{\rm b}$), beam position angles (PA) east of north,
typical image noise levels ($\Delta I$), astrometric errors ($\sigma_{1}$), residual systematic errors ($\sigma_{2}$) and any special comments.
Table \ref{tab:feature} listed only features detected in three or more epochs, which were used for kinematic analyses in the following sections.
All data of detected maser features are available in supplementary Table \ref{tab:obs}.
\subsection{Single-dish monitoring}
Single-dish monitoring was performed by the Hokkaido University Tomakomai 11-m Telescope \citep{Sorai2008}.
Follow-up monitoring was started from 2010 November and completed 2013 March.
Observing intervals were denser than bi-weekly, except for maintenance sessions during summer seasons.
The beam size and aperture efficiency were 4.2 arcmin and 49 per cent, respectively.
Detailed procedure of observations and data reductions using the NEWSTAR software package developed at Nobeyama Radio Observatory were already described in Paper I.
The total velocity coverage and final spectral resolution are 216 and 0.21 km s$^{-1}$, respectively.
The rms noise levels were $\sim$ 2-3 Jy in winter seasons and increased up to 15 Jy in the worst case in summer seasons.
\section{Results}
\subsection{Light Curve and Dynamic Spectrum}
Figure \ref{fig:light} shows the light curve of the main velocity component (-65 -- -45 km s$^{-1}$) that contains almost all maser flux in G353.
Typical single-dish spectra in both flare-up and quiescent phases were also plotted in Figure \ref{fig:spectrum}.
We have detected five maser flares during five years, and four except for the last one were also monitored by VERA.
The durations of these four flares were defined as, 1st: 300 -- 500, 2nd: 800 -- 950, 3rd: 1050 -- 1300, 4th: 1400 -- 1690, using the relative day counted from January 1st, 2008.
The target showed intermittent flare-up at a typical interval of $\sim$ 1.5 years, although no clear periodicity was seen as reported in Paper I.
A higher velocity component ($<$ -70 km s$^{-1}$), which showed a significant flare-up in the initial flare, has been staying quiescent state after the second flare.
We show a spectral movie made by all single-dish data in supplementary Figure 1.
\begin{figure}[htb]
\begin{center}
\FigureFile(90mm,90mm){fig1.eps}
\end{center}
\caption{Light curve for the main velocity component.
January 1st, 2008 is counted as the first day.
Filled squares and triangles correspond to the single-dish and VLBI data.
The flux was integrated over the veracity range (-65 to -45 km s$^{-1}$).
} \label{fig:light}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure}[htb]
\begin{center}
\FigureFile(90mm,90mm){fig2.eps}
\end{center}
\caption{Typical single-dish spectra in both flare-up phase (day $\sim$ 426) and quiescent phase (day $\sim$ 744).
We added flux offset of 0.5 Jy in the former.
The dot-dashed line indicates $V_{\rm sys}$ of -5.0 km s$^{-1}$.
} \label{fig:spectrum}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure*}[htb]
\begin{center}
\FigureFile(134mm,134mm){fig3.eps}
\end{center}
\caption{Dynamic spectrum in a veracity range of -40 to -80 km s$^{-1}$.
The grey shaded durations correspond maintenance sessions of the Tomakomai 11-m telescope.
Color version of this figure is available online.
} \label{fig:dynamic}
\end{figure*}
Figure \ref{fig:dynamic} presents a dynamic spectrum with a velocity range of -80 to -40 km s$^{-1}$.
The spectrum contains both of the single-dish and VLBI data.
The velocity widths were sometimes narrower in the latter data, because of resolved-out flux (e.g., day $\sim$ 840).
There is a clear signature of a systematic acceleration in several velocity components.
As already mentioned, accelerations of two velocity components in the 1st flare-up ($\sim$ -53 and -73 km s$^{-1}$) were already reported in Paper I.
These spatially independent components have shown a similar acceleration rate ($\sim$ -5 km s$^{-1}$ yr$^{-1}$).
After the 2nd flare-up, the newly appeared component around -47 km s$^{-1}$ had been continuously accelerated up to -63 km s$^{-1}$ during 3 years.
The linearly-fitted acceleration rate of this new component is -5.4 $\pm$ 0.18 km s$^{-1}$ yr$^{-1}$, where velocity dispersions were used as a fitting weight.
This is consistent with that of the two components in the 1st flare-up.
These accelerations along the LOS were also recognized in four individual maser features.
We accepted only an acceleration that exceeds a velocity dispersion of each maser feature, in order to avoid apparent accelerations that can be caused by an internal structure of features.
Figure \ref{fig:acc_feature} presents observed accelerations in the four features and Table \ref{tab:acceleration} summarizes linearly-fitted acceleration rates.
The averaged acceleration rate well agrees with that derived from the dynamic spectrum.
It should be noted that no significant acceleration is found in proper motions.
This is probably because the acceleration of -5 km s$^{-1}$ yr$^{-1}$ is relatively small, and also, an accelerating force is mainly along the LOS.
We will discuss about proper motions and an inclination angle of the maser outflow in the following sections.
These accelerations along the LOS probably contribute to the short maser lifetime in G353, decreasing the coherent path for maser amplification.
\begin{figure*}[htb]
\begin{center}
\FigureFile(150mm,150mm){fig4.eps}
\end{center}
\caption{Accelerations in individual features.
Error bars indicate a velocity dispersion in each feature.
Black lines present a linear acceleration determined by a dispersion-weighted fitting.
Four features (A4, A5, A7 and D5) have shown a clear signature of an acceleration beyond the velocity dispersions.
} \label{fig:acc_feature}
\end{figure*}
\begin{figure}[!htb]
\begin{center}
\FigureFile(90mm,90mm){fig5.eps}
\end{center}
\caption{Overall distribution of all maser features detected by VERA, including that reported in Paper I.
Filled triangle presents a position of each maser feature with color indicating a LOS velocity.
The coordinate origin is ($\alpha$,$\delta$)$_{\rm J2000.0}$ = (\timeform{17h26m01.5883s}, \timeform{-34D15'14.903"}). } \label{fig:map}
\end{figure}
\subsection{Maser Distributions}
Figure \ref{fig:map} presents the overall distribution of maser features detected in all the VERA observations, including that reported in Paper I.
The $X$, $Y$ and color show the right ascension offset ($X$ = $\Delta\alpha$cos$\delta$), declination offset ($Y$ = $\Delta\delta$) and LOS velocity ($V_{\rm LSR}$), respectively.
The coordinate origin is the position of the brightest maser spot detected in Paper I, i.e., ($\alpha$,$\delta$)$_{\rm J2000.0}$ = (\timeform{17h26m01.5883s}, \timeform{-34D15'14.903"}).
Most of the maser features are concentrated near the origin, belonging to the main velocity components (-65 -- -45 km s$^{-1}$).
All of other significantly blue-shifted features (-120 -- -70 km s$^{-1}$) spread eastward.
On the other hand, slightly red-shifted components ($\sim$ 0 km s$^{-1}$) were appeared at the western end during the latter 7 epochs.
This is the first VLBI detection of red-shifted components in G353.
We note that the most red-shifted component of +87 km s$^{-1}$ found in CP08 was out of our velocity coverage.
We compared distributions of the central maser cluster appeared in each flare-up phase in Figure \ref{fig:flare}.
Here 1st to 4th flares correspond epoch 2 -- 4, 8 -- 9, 11 -- 15 and 18 -- 23, respectively.
We always detected filamentary maser distributions in all flares, suggesting a shock propagation.
Although all the flares showed clearly different morphologies each other, the maser filaments always appeared in 100 $\times$ 100 AU$^{2}$ region around the origin.
\begin{figure*}[htb]
\begin{center}
\FigureFile(140mm,140mm){fig6.eps}
\end{center}
\caption{Structures of the central maser cluster in each maser flare.
The coordinate origin is same as that in Figure \ref{fig:map}.
The open star marks the peak position of the radio jet at 22 GHz, which contains a positional error of $\sim$ 50 mas,
including both an astrometric error reported in \citet{Motogi2013} and an internal error due to thermal image noises.
A filamentary distribution was always found within 100 $\times$ 100 AU$^{2}$ region around the origin.
} \label{fig:flare}
\end{figure*}
\subsection{Annual Parallax and Absolute Proper Motions}
We have successfully traced several relatively-stable maser features during 200 days in the 4th flare, thanks to the short observing interval.
We, hence, tried to measure absolute proper motions and annual parallax of these maser features.
We only used features that were successively detected in more than five epochs.
Some features were also detected in epoch 17, which was observed by only three stations because of the antenna trouble in Mizusawa station.
However, data in this epoch were not included for the astrometric analysis, because all features showed large and systematic jump ($\sim$ 3 mas) of absolute positions.
There were five maser features available in these criteria (see Table \ref{tab:feature}).
It should be noted that we only used $X$ data for a parallax fitting, since $Y$ data contributed not at all.
This is because the synthesized beams were significantly elongated along the N-S direction, causing large errors in $Y$ direction (see Table \ref{tab:obs}).
In addition, expected amplitude of a sinusoidal motion in $Y$ direction was five times smaller than that in $X$, because of a small ecliptic latitude ($\sim$ -11$^{\circ}$).
We performed $\chi^{2}$-fitting of the common annual parallax ($\pi$) and linear absolute proper motions ($\mu^{abs}_{X}$) of each features.
We included both of total astrometric errors in Table \ref{tab:obs} and positional dispersions in Table \ref{tab:feature} as a fitting weight.
Figure \ref{fig:parallax} shows the best-fit parallax with all data points after the subtraction of linear proper motions.
Individual fitting results for each maser feature are shown in supplementary Figure 2.
The best-fit $\pi$ was 0.59 $\pm$ 0.05.
The formal error was estimated as the reduced $\chi$ square to be unity.
Unfortunately, a short lifetime of the maser features prevented us to trace a full parallactic cycle.
Our parallax fitting can contains a systematic error that cannot be evaluated directly.
We deduced such a systematic error via the Montecarlo analysis, where 10$^{4}$-times simulated fittings were performed, using the same observing epochs and the parallax of 0.59 mas.
Positional errors in each epoch were randomly added, following a gaussian distribution with standard deviations same as the astrometric errors in Table \ref{tab:obs}.
Figure \ref{fig:prob} presents a probability distribution of simulated $\pi$ values.
The best-fit 1-$\sigma$ deviation of 0.035 mas was adopted as a systematic error of our fitting.
We finally obtained a parallax of 0.59 $\pm$ 0.06, considering a root sum square of the formal fitting error and the systematic error.
The newly derived distance is 1.70 $^{+0.19}_{-0.16}$ kpc.
This is consistent with the commonly used photometric distance \citep{Neckel1978}.
We, thus, conclude that our parallax measurement is well reliable and new distance of 1.7 kpc were employed in this paper.
The best-fit absolute motions are listed in Table \ref{tab:absolute}, where absolute proper motions in $Y$ direction were fitted by a linear motions under the fixed $\pi$.
We also determined absolute motions of three maser features, which had been excluded from the parallax fitting, in the same way.
\begin{figure}[!tb]
\begin{center}
\FigureFile(90mm,90mm){fig7.eps}
\end{center}
\caption{The best-fit parallax.
All the data points used for the fitting are plotted as filled squares after subtraction of the linear absolute proper motions.
} \label{fig:parallax}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure}[!tb]
\begin{center}
\FigureFile(90mm,90mm){fig8.eps}
\end{center}
\caption{The probability distribution obtained by the simulated $\pi$ fittings in our Montecarlo analysis.
The dotted-curve shows the best fit gaussian distribution.
} \label{fig:prob}
\end{figure}
\subsection{Internal Proper Motions}
All the absolute proper motions determined in previous section includes a common systemic velocity that consists of the solar motion with respect to the LSR, the differential of the galactic rotation and the unknown peculiar motion of the system.
Therefore, we also estimated relative proper motions with respect to the reference maser features, in order to discuss intrinsic 3D kinematics of the masers.
We employed four distinct reference features, since no identical feature survived throughout all the observing epochs.
Data were, hence, divided into four durations (epoch 2 -- 7, 8 -- 11, 12 -- 15 and 16 -- 23), depending on a reference feature.
We estimated relative proper motions for each duration, using only a feature that detected in three or more epoch.
All the features used for relative motion measurements are also listed in Table \ref{tab:feature}.
Internal proper motions without any systemic motion were derived using these relative motions, as follows.
An relative proper motion vector of i-th feature ($\vec{\mu'_{\rm i}}$) can be expressed as,
\begin{eqnarray}
\vec{\mu'_{\rm i}} = \vec{\mu_{i}} - \vec{\mu_{0}}.
\end{eqnarray}
Here $\vec{\mu_{i}}$ and $\vec{\mu_{0}}$ indicates an internal proper motion vector of i-th and reference maser feature, respectively.
One can reconstruct $\vec{\mu_{i}}$, if both of $\vec{\mu^{'}_{\rm i}}$ and $\vec{\mu_{0}}$ are avilable.
For this purpose, we deduced $\vec{\mu_{0}}$, assuming a symmetric distribution of $\vec{\mu_{i}}$ in each duration, i.e.,
\begin{eqnarray}
\sum_{i \neq 0}^{n}\vec{\mu_{i}} = 0.
\end{eqnarray}
Here $n$ is total number of maser features except for a reference feature. In this case, equation (2) simply gives,
\begin{eqnarray}
\vec{\mu_{0}} = -\frac{1}{n}\sum_{i \neq 0}^{n}\vec{\mu^{'}_{i}}.
\end{eqnarray}
We listed originally measured $\vec{\mu'_{i}}$ and reconstructed $\vec{\mu_{i}}$ in Table \ref{tab:internal}.
It should be noted that the assumption of the equation (2) is adequate in our case.
This was examined by following procedures, comparing $\vec{\mu_{i}}$ with that independently deduced from the absolute proper motions ($\vec{\mu}^{\rm abs}_i$) in Table \ref{tab:absolute}.
We first estimated the systemic motion using the reference feature D8 in the final duration as,
\begin{eqnarray}
\vec{\mu}_{\rm sys} = \vec{\mu}^{\rm abs}_{\rm D8} - \vec{\mu}_{\rm D8}.
\end{eqnarray}
Obtained $\vec{\mu}_{\rm sys}$ is 0.47 $\pm$ 0.07 and 0.99 $\pm$ 1.04 mas yr$^{-1}$ in $X$ and $Y$ direction, respectively.
Then $\vec{\mu}^{\rm abs}_i$ were converted to $\vec{\mu_{i}}$, subtracting the $\vec{\mu}_{\rm sys}$.
Figure \ref{fig:propers} presents a comparison of $\vec{\mu_{i}}$ determined by two different ways.
A good correlation between two data suggests that the equation (2) is well applicable in G353.
Figure \ref{fig:arrow} shows both relative and internal motion vectors, superposed on the maser distribution.
The highly blue-shifted features in the east region and the red-shifted features at the west end were moving away each other, suggesting a bipolar motion along the E-W direction.
On the other hand, the central cluster basically showed westward motions in all the durations.
We note that this is only a projected motion and most of the 3D vectors in the cluster are nearly along the LOS (see Section 4).
\begin{figure}[!t]
\begin{center}
\FigureFile(80mm,80mm){fig9.eps}
\end{center}
\caption{Comparison of internal proper motions derived from two different methods.
The horizontal axes ($\mu_{X1}$, $\mu_{Y1}$) show internal motions converted from the internal proper motions,
while the vertical axes ($\mu_{X2}$, $\mu_{Y2}$) show that from the absolute proper motions.
Two dotted lines indicate completely identical cases ($y$ = $x$).
} \label{fig:propers}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure}[!tb]
\begin{center}
\FigureFile(90mm,90mm){fig10.eps}
\end{center}
\caption{Upper panel: relative proper motions superposed on the maser distribution.
The blue and red arrows indicate proper motions of blue-shifted and red-shifted features, respectively.
The green arrows are the same as the blue ones, but with an inclination angle larger than 25$^{\circ}$ from the LOS.
Lower panel: internal proper motions converted from the relative proper motions, using the motion of reference maser feature.
} \label{fig:arrow}
\end{figure}
\section{Discussions}
\subsection{Inclination and Structure of the Maser Jet}
Table \ref{tab:inclination} contains 3D velocities and inclination angles, which were calculated from the internal proper motions and LOS velocities assuming the distance of 1.7 kpc.
Almost all the blue-shifted features have 3D motions nearly along the LOS.
This fact confirmed that the H$_{2}$O masers in G353 were associated with a face-on protostellar jet, as proposed by CP08.
The westward expansions seen in the central cluster can be explained by a finite opening angle and face-on geometry of the jet.
Figure \ref{fig:inclination} shows the relation of the inclination angles to the internal proper motions in $X$ direction.
The features moving eastward are more closely along the LOS than that moving westward.
The averaged inclination angles are 17$^{\circ}$ and 34$^{\circ}$ from the LOS for the eastward and westward features, respectively.
If the masers are excited on the working surface between the jet and cavity wall having a constant opening angle,
the jet axis is rather inclined ($\sim$ 8$^{\circ}$) to the west from the LOS.
Another possible explanation is that the masers are associated with two distinct outflows having a different collimation as in the case of CepA HW2 \citep{Torrelles2011},
i.e., collimated jet and wide angle (or equatorial) outflow.
If this is the case, the eastward features, which have rather higher 3D velocities, may trace the collimated jet.
A jet inclination of $\sim$ 17$^{\circ}$ is simply expected from the averaged inclination of the eastward masers.
On the other hand, a wide angle outflow traced by the westward features would have a large opening angle up to $\sim$ 80$^{\circ}$ from the jet axis.
Schematic views of these two cases are showed in Figure \ref{fig:schematic}.
Although the red-shifted features at the west end strongly suggest a bipolar morphology along the E-W direction,
this position angle seems to be perpendicular to that of the radio jet in the arcsecond scale \citep{Motogi2013}.
This can be explained by the projection effect, or the radio jet may trace an ionized equatorial wind reported in \citet{Gibb2007} and \citet{Maud2013}.
These red-shifted features are moving almost along the celestial plane, contrary to the blue-shifted features.
We suggest that the blue-shifted masers trace more intrinsic outflow kinematics at the root region,
since the peak position of the radio jet indicates that the host object is located at the almost same position as the central blue-shifted cluster (see Figure \ref{fig:flare}).
If the red-shifted features are excited by the same driving source, the jet may be strongly bending within 500 AU from the source,
otherwise, these features can be associated with a wide-angle outflow, discussed above.
A VLBI position and proper motion of the extremely red-shifted component will allow us to solve these questions,
because such high-velocity component probably reflects an intrinsic motion of the westward jet.
An interferometric imaging of the thermal molecular jet found in \citet{Motogi2013} will be also helpful to understand the overall extent and trajectory of the jet.
\begin{figure}[hb]
\begin{center}
\FigureFile(85mm,85mm){fig11.eps}
\end{center}
\caption{Relation between inclination angles and internal proper motions in $X$ direction.
The dotted line indicates $\mu_{X}$ = 0.
The eastward features clearly show smaller inclinations than the westward features.
} \label{fig:inclination}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure*}[ht]
\begin{center}
\FigureFile(145mm,145mm){fig12.eps}
\end{center}
\caption{Schematic views of possible geometries in G353.
Thick black lines indicate the LOS and celestial plane.
Thin black arrows show inclinations and 3D velocities of all the blue-shifted masers.
Blue hatched regions show a jet (and/or outflow) cavity.
We also showed roughly estimated inclinations from the LOS.
Color version of this figure is available in on-line.
} \label{fig:schematic}
\end{figure*}
\subsection{Recurrent Shock Propagations}
The recurrent formations of a filamentary maser distribution indicates episodic shock propagations, as suggested in Paper I.
The short maser lifetime in G353 can simply emphasize one-to-one relation between maser flares and shock propagations.
Paper I discussed that such a recurrent shock is possibly caused by an episodic jet-launching or precession.
Although our new data do not exclude both cases, no precession signature in the radio jet may support the episodic jet-launching.
The spatial scale in which the maser filament recurrently appeared is $\sim$ 100 $\times$ 100 AU$^{2}$.
This scale can be resolved by the maximum resolution of Atacama Large Millimeter/Submillimeter Array (ALMA) in near future.
Therefore, there will be a chance to directly determine which case is correct, by monitoring of how shocked gas varies using a thermal tracer.
Such a monitoring was already succeeded in the case of the molecular jet associated with a nearby low mass protostar \citep{Jimenez2011}.
\subsection{Jet Accelerating Region}
Figure \ref{fig:dynamic} indicates that the acceleration of the main velocity component also occurs recurrently.
In addition, the acceleration had clearly continued beyond a lifetime of individual maser feature.
These facts suggest that the H$_{2}$O maser in G353 traces a region where molecular gas is steadily accelerated.
The spatial distribution of accelerating velocity components is almost consistent with the region where maser features are recurrently formed, i.e., $\sim$ 100 $\times$ 100 AU$^{2}$ wide around the root of the bipolar jet.
If we adopt the expected inclinations and opening angles, the LOS extent of such an accelerating region is 180 -- 300 AU.
The thermal SiO spectrum reported in \citet{Motogi2013} has indicated
that the maximum LOS velocity of shocked molecular gas is $\sim$ -120 km s$^{-1}$, similar to that of the maser emission.
An important fact is that such highest-velocity maser components have shown no significant acceleration in our monitoring.
It can be interpreted as that the molecular jet is accelerated up to this velocity, and then, turns into free expansion.
In order to examine this possibility, we must study velocity structures of both pre-shock and post-shock gas along the jet axis in multi-scale.
The most plausible origin of such an acceleration is momentum supply from an optical jet.
A momentum rate of the maser flow in G353 was estimated as $\sim$ 10$^{-3}$ $M_{\odot}$ km s$^{-1}$ yr$^{-1}$ in Paper I.
This order of momentum rate is often found in high mass star formation (e.g., \cite{Wu2004}).
If we consider a radiation pressure, a bolometric luminosity higher than 10$^{5}$ $L_{\odot}$ is required to achieve the momentum rate at the radius of 150 AU, although such a high luminosity is quite rare and may be unlikely case in G353.
Another possible origin is a magnetic pressure gradient along the jet axis (e.g., \cite{Machida2008}).
This can be examined by a first-principle MHD simulation, tracing rather longer-term outflow evolution than that commonly reported at present.
\subsection{The origin of DBSMs}
\citet{Breen2010} have shown that the number of DBSMs without any OH maser (i.e., youngest evolutionary stage) is statistically superior to red-shifted counterparts where maser fluxes dominated by highly red-shifted emissions.
Therefore, there must be some intrinsic origin of the blue-shift dominance.
\citet{Motogi2013} have proposed that an optically thick disk in a nearly face-on geometry can selectively cause a blue-shift dominance, masking any red-shifted emission.
This scenario is still plausible, because there is no red-shifted component around the center of the bipolar distribution, where the host HMYSO is thought to be embedded with a disk.
Further test will be given by an exact position of the extremely red-shifted component at +87 km s$^{-1}$.
Alternatively, if a circumstellar radiation field is completely dominated by spherically-symmetric fluxes from a central object,
only blue-shifted components can receive seed photons for maser amplifications towards the observer.
The two-outflow model may prefer this explanation, allowing a lack of eastward red-shifted masers associated with the wide angle outflow.
This can be applicable in the case of G353 that has no background HII region.
In either case, more statistical samples are required to find out the true origin.
One must compare the geometry of a disk/jet system, optical depth of a disk and circumstellar environment in several DBSMs,
combining a VLBI array and the highest-resolution connected array such as ALMA.
\section{Conclusions}
We have conducted a follow-up VLBI and single-dish monitoring for the highly variable H$_{2}$O masers in G353.
Thanks to the denser monitoring interval than that in Paper I, several properties of G353 have been revealed as follows.
\begin{description}
\item [ (1)] The H$_{2}$O masers are associated with the bipolar jet along the E-W direction.
An inclination angle of the jet axis is expected to be 8$^{\circ}$ -- 17$^{\circ}$, suggesting a nearly face-on geometry as proposed in CP08.
\\
\item [ (2)] Intermittent flare activities are caused by recurrent shock propagations.
Such shocks are probably explained by episodic jet-launchings.
This will be verified by a direct monitoring of shocked gas with ALMA, using a thermal tracer.
\\
\item [ (3)] The systematic accelerations were recurrently detected and continued beyond a lifetime of individual maser features.
These accelerating masers probably trace a region, where molecular gas is steadily accelerated up to -120 km s$^{-1}$ within 100$\times$100$\times$300 AU$^{3}$ box ($X$, $Y$ and the LOS, respectively) around the root of the bipolar jet.
\\
\item [ (4)] The measured annual parallax indicates a distance of 1.70 $^{+0.19}_{-0.16}$ kpc, supporting a commonly-used photometric distance.
\\
\item [ (5)] The origin of DBSMs is still open question. This can be explained by a masking effect of optically thick face-on disk as proposed in Paper I.
We require more statistical data about a geometry of a disk/jet system, optical depth of a disk and circumstellar environment towards the known DBSMs.
\end{description}
\bigskip
The author heavily thanks to all the members in VERA and Hokkaido Univerisity Tomakomai Radio Observatory
for their assistance in operations on the very long-term monitoring.
The author also thanks to the anonymous referee for useful suggestions and very encouraging comments.
This work was financially supported by the Grant-in-Aid for the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science Fellows (K.M.)
and the Grants-in-Aid by the Ministry of Education, Culture, and Science of Japan 24-6525 (K.M.).
|
\section{Introduction}
\label{sec:Introduction}
Over the last few years the Internet of Things (IoT) \cite{P003} has gained significant attention from both industry and academia. Since the term was introduced in the late 1990s many solutions have been introduced to the IoT marketplace by different types of organization ranging from start-ups, academic institutions, government organizations and large enterprises \cite{ZMP007}. IoT's popularity is governed by both the value that it promises to create and market growth and predictions \cite{ZMP003}. The IoT allows '\textit{people and things to be connected Anytime, Anyplace, with Anything and Anyone, ideally using Any path/network and Any service}' \cite{P029}. Such technology will help to create '\textit{a better world for human beings}', where objects around us know what we like, what we want, and what we need and act accordingly without explicit instructions \cite{ZMP007}.
Context-aware communication and computing is a key technology that enables intelligent interactions such as those which the IoT paradigm envisions. Let us briefly introduce some of the terms in this domain which will help to better understand the remaining sections. Context can be defined \textit{as any information that can be used to characterize the situation of an entity. An entity is a person, place, piece of software, software service or object that is considered relevant to the interaction between a user and an application, including the user and application themselves} \cite{P104}. Context-awareness can be defined \textit{as the ability of a system to provide relevant information or services to users using context information where relevance depends on the user's task} \cite{P104}. Context-aware communication and computing has been researched extensively since the early 2000s and several surveys have been conducted in this field. The latest survey on context-aware computing focusing on the IoT was conducted by Perera et al. \cite{ZMP007}. Several other important surveys are analysed and listed in \cite{ZMP007}. However, all these surveys focus on academic research.
To the best of our knowledge, however, no survey has focused on industrial IoT solutions. All the above-mentioned surveys have reviewed the solutions proposed by the academic and research community and refer to scholarly publications produced by the respective researchers. In this paper, we review IoT solutions that have been proposed, designed, developed, and brought into the market by industrial organizations. These organizations range from start-ups and small and medium enterprises to large corporations. Because of their industrial and market-driven nature, most of the IoT solutions in the market are not published as academic work. Therefore, we collected information about the solutions from their respective websites, demo videos, technical specifications, and consumer reviews. Understanding how context-aware technologies are used in the IoT solutions in the industry's marketplace is vital for academics, researchers, and industrialists so they can identify trends, industry requirements, demands, and innovation opportunities.
The rest of the article is organized as follows. In Section \ref{sec:Classification}, we briefly analyse IoT marketplace trends and growth. The evolution of context-aware technologies and applications are presented in Section \ref{sec:Evolution}. Then, we introduce the theoretical foundation and our evaluation framework used in this paper in Section \ref{sec:Theory}. Subsequently, in Section \ref{sec:Review}, we review a selected number of IoT solutions from context-aware perspective. Later, we present lessons learned and innovation opportunities based on the evaluation results in Section \ref{sec:Lessons_Learned}. Finally, we present the conclusion remarks.
\section{Internet of Things Marketplace}
\label{sec:Classification}
The vision of the IoT has been heavily energised by statistics and predictions. In this section, we discuss some of the statistics and facts related to the IoT which allows us to understand how the IoT has grown over the years and how it is expected to grow in the future. Further, these statistics and facts highlight the future trends in the industry marketplace.
It is estimated that there about 1.5 billion Internet-enabled PCs and over 1 billion Internet-enabled mobile phones today. These two categories will be joined by Internet-enabled smart objects \cite{P041, TII07} in the future. By 2020, there will be 50 to 100 billion devices connected to the Internet, ranging from smartphones, PCs, and ATMs (Automated Teller Machine) to manufacturing equipment in factories and products in shipping containers \cite{ZMP008}. As depicted in Figure \ref{Figure:Statistics3}, the number of things connected to the Internet exceeded the number of people on Earth in 2008. According to CISCO, each individual on earth will have more than six devices connected to the Internet by 2020.
\begin{figure}[!h]
\centering
\includegraphics[scale=0.48]{./Images/1_4_Statistics.pdf}
\caption{Growth in Internet-Connected Devices / Objects by 2020.}
\label{Figure:Statistics3}
\end{figure}
According to BCC Research 2011 market report on sensors, the global market for sensors was around \$56.3 billion in 2010. In 2011, it was around \$62.8 billion. The global market for sensors is expected to increase to \$91.5 billion by 2016, at a compound annual growth rate of 7.8\%. One of the techniques for connecting everyday objects into networks is radio frequency identification — RFID technology \cite{Z1044}. In this technology, the data carried by the chip attached to an object is transmitted via wireless links. RFID has the capability to convert dump devices into comparatively smart objects. RFID systems can be used wherever automated labelling, identification, registration, storage, monitoring, or transport is required to increase efficiency and effectiveness. According to Frost \& Sullivan (2011), the global RFID market was valued at from \$3 billion to \$4 billion in 2009. The RFID market will grow by 20\% per year through 2016 and reach a volume of approximately from \$6.5 billion to almost \$9 billion. According to Figure \ref{Figure:Statistics2}, it is expected that five main sectors, education, transportation, industry, healthcare, and retails, will generate 76\% of the total RFID market demand by 2016.
\begin{figure}[!h]
\centering
\includegraphics[scale=0.48]{./Images/1_3_Statistics.pdf}
\caption{RFID Sales by Major Market Segments.}
\label{Figure:Statistics2}
\end{figure}
``Smart city'' \cite{P532} is a concept aimed at providing a set of new generation services and infrastructure with the help of information and communication technologies (ICT). Smart cities are expected to be composed of many different smart domains. Smart transportation, smart security and smart energy management are some of the most important components for building smart cities \cite{TII04}. However, in term of market, smart homes, smart grid, smart healthcare, and smart transportation solutions are expected to generate the majority of sales. According to MarketsandMarkets report on Smart Cities Market (2011 - 2016), the global smart city market is expected to cross \$1 trillion by 2016, growing at a CAGR of 14.2\% as illustrated in Figure \ref{Figure:Statistics1}.
\begin{figure}[!h]
\centering
\includegraphics[scale=0.48]{./Images/1_2_Statistics.pdf}
\caption{Smart Product Sales by Market in 2016.}
\label{Figure:Statistics1}
\end{figure}
The interconnection and communication between everyday objects, in the IoT paradigm, enables many applications in many domains. Asin and Gascon \cite{WaspMote} have listed 54 application domains under 12 categories: smart cities, smart environment, smart water, smart metering, security and emergencies, retail, logistics, industrial control, smart agriculture, smart animal farming, domestic and home automation, and eHealth. After analysing the industry marketplace and careful consideration, we classified the popular existing IoT solutions in the marketplace into five different categories: smart wearable, smart home, smart city, smart environment, smart enterprise. In this paper, we review over 100 different IoT solutions in total. It is important to note that not all the solutions we examined are listed in the technology review in Table \ref{Tbl:Evaluation_of_Previous_Research_Efforts}. For the review, we selected a wide range of IoT products which demonstrate different context-aware functionalities.
\section{Evolution of Context-aware Technology}
\label{sec:Evolution}
\begin{figure*}[!t]
\centering
\includegraphics[scale=0.65]{./Images/33-Evolution_of_Internet.pdf}
\vspace{-0.33cm}
\caption{Evolution of the Internet in five phases. The evolution of Internet begins with connecting two computers together and then moved towards creating World Wide Web by connecting large number of computers together. The mobile-Internet emerged by connecting mobile devices to the Internet. Then, peoples' identities joined the Internet via social networks. Finally, it is moving towards Internet of Things by connecting every day objects to the Internet}
\label{Figure:Evolution_of_Internet}
\vspace{-0.4cm}
\end{figure*}
It is important to understand the evolution of the Internet before discussing the evolution of context-aware technologies. The Internet broadly evolved in five phases as illustrated in Figure \ref{Figure:Evolution_of_Internet}. The evolution of Internet begins with connecting two computers together and then moved towards creating the World Wide Web by connecting large number of computers together. Mobile-Internet emerged when mobile devices were connected to the Internet. People's identities were added to the Internet via social networks \cite{NP001}. Finally, the Internet of Things emerged, comprised of everyday objects added to the Internet. During the course of these phases, the application of context-aware communication and computing changed significantly \cite{ZMP007}.
In the early phase of computer networking when computers were connected to each other in point-to-point fashion, context-aware functionalities were not widely used. Providing help to users based on the context (of the application currently open) was one of the fundamental context-aware interactions provided in early computer applications and operating systems. Another popular use of context is context-aware menus that help users to perform tasks tailored to each situation in a given application. When the Internet came into being, location information started to become critical context information. Location information (retrieved through IP addresses) were used by services offered over the Internet in order to provide location-aware customization to users. Once the mobile devices (phones and tablets) became a popular and integral part of everyday life, context information collected from sensors built-in to the devices (e.g. accelerometer, gravity, gyroscope, GPS, linear accelerometer, and rotation vector, orientation, geomagnetic field, and proximity, and light, pressure, humidity and temperature) were used to provide context-aware functionality. For example, built-in sensors are used to determine user activities, environmental monitoring, health and well-being, location and so on \cite{P217}.
Over the last few years social networking \cite{IA01} has become popular and widely used. Context information gathered through social networking services \cite{IA08} (e.g. \textit{Facebook}, \textit{Myspace}, \textit{Twitter}, and \textit{Foursquare}) has been fused with the other context information retrieved through mobile devices to build novel context-aware applications such as activity predictions, recommendations, and personal assistance \cite{NP002}. For example, a mobile application may offer context-aware functionalities by fusing location information retrieved from mobile phones and recent `likes' retrieved from social media sites to recommend nearby restaurants that a user might like. In the next phase, `things' were connected to the Internet by creating the IoT paradigm. An example of context-aware functionality provided in the IoT paradigm would be an Internet-connected refrigerator telling users what is inside it, what needs to be purchased or what kind of recipes can be prepared for dinner. When the user leaves the office, the application autonomously does the shopping and guides the user to a particular shopping market so s/he can collect the goods it has purchased. In order to perform such tasks, the application must fuse location data, user preferences, activity prediction, user schedules, information retrieved through the refrigerator (i.e. shopping list) and many more. In the light of the above examples, it is evident that the complexity of collecting, processing and fusing information has increased over time. The amount of information collected to aid decision-making has also increased significantly.
\section{Theoretical Foundation and Evaluation Framework}
\label{sec:Theory}
This section discusses context-aware theories and related historic developments over time. The evaluation framework which we used to review IoT products in the marketplace are built upon the theoretical foundation presented in this section. First, we lay the theoretical foundation and secondly we discuss the evaluation framework.
\subsection{Context-aware Computing Theories}
The term \textit{context} has been defined by many researchers. Dey et al. \cite{P143} have evaluated and highlighted the weaknesses of these definitions. Dey claimed that the definition provided by Schilit and Theimer \cite{P173} was based on examples and cannot be used to identify new context. Further, Dey claimed that definitions provided by Brown \cite{P175}, Franklin and Flachsbart \cite{P178}, Rodden et al. \cite{P181}, Hull et al. \cite{P179}, and Ward et al. \cite{P183} used synonyms to refer to context, such as `environment' and `situation'. Therefore, these definitions also cannot be used to identify new context. Abowd and Mynatt \cite{P115} have identified the five W's (Who, What, Where, When, Why) as the minimum information that is necessary to understand context. Schilit et al. \cite{P116} and Pascoe \cite{P180} have also defined the term context.
We accept the definition of context provided by Abowd et al. \cite{P104} to be used in this research work, because their definition can be used to identify context from data in general. We presented the definition of \textit{context} in Section \ref{sec:Introduction}.
\begin{figure}[!b]
\centering
\includegraphics[scale=0.74]{./Images/16_1_Theoratical_Summary.pdf}
\caption{Context-aware features identified by different researchers: Abowd et al. \cite{P104} (Blue), Schilit et al. \cite{P116} (Yellow), Pascoe \cite{P180} (Green). Ccontext-awareness as been defined using these features (can also be called characteristics of a given system) }
\label{Figure:Theoratical_Summary}
\end{figure}
The term \textit{context awareness}, also called \textit{sentient}, was first introduced by Schilit and Theimer \cite{P173} in 1994. Later, it was defined by Ryan et al. \cite{P182}. In both cases, the focus was on computer applications and systems. As stated by Abowd et al. \cite{P104}, those definitions are too specific and cannot be used to identify whether a given system is a context-aware system or not. We presented the definition provided by Abowd et al. \cite{P104} in Section \ref{sec:Introduction}. After analysing and comparing the two previous efforts conducted by Schilit et al. \cite{P116} and Pascoe \cite{P180}, Abowd et al. \cite{P104} identified three features that a context-aware application can support: presentation, execution, and tagging. Even though, the IoT vision was not known at the time these features are identified, they are highly applicable to the IoT paradigm as well. We elaborate these features from an IoT perspective.
\begin{itemize}
\item \textbf{Presentation:} Context can be used to decide what information and services need to be presented to the user. Let us consider a smart \cite{P007} environment scenario. When a user enters a supermarket and takes their smart phone out, what they want to see is their shopping list. Context-aware mobile applications need to connect to kitchen appliances such as a smart refrigerator \cite{P352} in the home to retrieve the shopping list and present it to the user. This provides the idea of presenting information based on context such as location, time, etc. By definition, IoT promises to provide any service anytime, anyplace, with anything and anyone, ideally using any path/network.
\item \textbf{Execution:} Automatic execution of services is also a critical feature in the IoT paradigm. Let us consider a smart home \cite{P007} environment. When a user starts driving home from their office, the IoT application employed in the house should switch on the air condition system and switch on the coffee machine to be ready to use by the time the user steps into their house. These actions need to be taken automatically based on the context. Machine-to-machine communication is a significant part of the IoT.
\item\textbf{Tagging:} In the IoT paradigm, there will be a large number of sensors attached to everyday objects. These objects will produce large volumes of sensor data that has to be collected, analysed, fused and interpreted \cite{P109}. Sensor data produced by a single sensor will not provide the necessary information that can be used to fully understand the situation \cite{IA06}. Therefore, sensor data collected through multiple sensors needs to be fused together \cite{IA05}. In order to accomplish the sensor data fusion task, context needs to be collected. Context needs to be tagged together with the sensor data to be processed and understood later. Context annotation plays a significant role in context-aware computing research. The \textit{tagging} operation also identified as \textit{annotation}.
\end{itemize}
\begin{figure*}[!t]
\centering
\includegraphics[scale=0.68]{./Images/16_2_Context_aware_Big_Picture.pdf}
\vspace{-0.33cm}
\caption{Data Flow in IoT Solutions in High-level. Context can be discovers in different stages / phases in the data flow. A typical IoT solution may use some part of the data flow architecture depending on the their intended functionalities.}
\label{Figure:Context_aware_Big_Picture}
\vspace{-0.4cm}
\end{figure*}
In Figure \ref{Figure:Theoratical_Summary}, we summarise three different context-aware features presented by researchers. It is clear that all these classification methods have similarities. We have considered all these feature sets when developing our evaluation framework.
\subsection{Evaluation Framework}
This section presents the evaluation framework we used to review the IoT products in context-aware perspective. We developed this evaluation framework based on the widely recognized and cited research done by Abowd et al. \cite{P104}. In this evaluation, we apply one and half decade old context aware theories into IoT era. Our evaluation is mainly based on three context-aware features in high-level: 1)\textit{ context-aware selection and presentation}, 2) \textit{context-aware execution}, and 3) \textit{context-aware-tagging}. However, we have also enriched the evaluation framework by identifying sub-features under above mentioned three features. Our evaluation framework consists of nine (9) features.
The Figure \ref{Figure:Context_aware_Big_Picture} visualizes how data is being collected transferred, processed, context discovered and annotated in typical IoT solutions. It is important to note that not all solutions may use the exact same data flow. Each solution may use part of the architecture in their solution. We will refer to this common data flow architecture during this paper to demonstrate how each solution may design their data flows. Our objective is to identify major strategies that are used by IoT products to offer context-aware functionalities. From here onwards, we explain the taxonomy, the evaluation framework, used to evaluate the IoT products. The results of the evaluation are presented in Table \ref{Tbl:Evaluation_of_Previous_Research_Efforts}. Summary of the evaluation framework is presented in Table \ref{Tbl:Summarized_taxonmy}.
First we introduce the name of the IoT solution in the column (1) in Table \ref{Tbl:Evaluation_of_Previous_Research_Efforts}. We also provide the web page link of the each product / solution. It is important to note that, these products does not have any related academic publication. Therefore, we believe that web page links are the most reliable reference to a given IoT solution. Such links allow readers to follow further reading by using the product name along with web link.
In column (2), we classify each product into five categories. Each category is denoted by a different colour: \iftrue red {\color{SC}\rule{0.2cm}{0.2cm}} (smart city), yellow
{\color{SN}\rule{0.2cm}{0.2cm}} (smart environment), blue {\color{SE}\rule{0.2cm}{0.2cm}} (smart enterprise), green {\color{SW}\rule{0.2cm}{0.2cm}} (smart wearable), and purple {\color{SH}\rule{0.2cm}{0.2cm}} (smart home). \else red \catC (smart city), yellow \catV (smart environment), blue \catN (smart enterprise), green \catW (smart wearable), and purple \catH (smart home). \fi Some solutions may belong to multiple categories. We divide the rest of the columns into three section : \textit{Context-aware Tagging}, \textit{Context Selection and Presentation}, and \textit{Context execution}.
\subsubsection{Context-aware Tagging Section}
\begin{figure}[!b]
\centering
\vspace{-0.43cm}
\includegraphics[scale=0.45]{./Images/16_4_Primary_Context.pdf}
\caption{\textit{SenseAware} (senseaware.com) uses small smart devices that comprises five different built-in sensors with limited computational and communication capabilities. It reports the status of the packages in real time to the cloud. These smart devices comes in different sizes and form factors, as illustrated here, in order to support different types of packaging methods (Two types of smart devices are shown in the figure)}
\label{Figure:Primary_Context}
\end{figure}
Context-aware tagging, which is also called context augmentation and annotation represent the idea of sensing the environment and collecting primary context information. We also believe that secondary context generation is also a part of context-aware tagging feature. Primary context is any information retrieved without using existing context and without performing any kind of sensor data fusion operations \cite{ZMP007}. For example, \textit{SenseAware} (senseaware.com) is a solution developed to support real-time shipment tracking. As illustrated in Figure \ref{Figure:Primary_Context}, \textit{SenseAware} collects and processes context information such as location, temperature, light, relative humidity and biometric pressure in order to enhance the visibility and transparency of the supply chain. \textit{SenseAware} uses both hardware and software components in their sensor-based logistic solution. such data collection allows different parties engage in supply chain to monitor the movement of goods in real-time and accurately know the quality of the transported goods and plan their processes effectively and efficiently. We list commonly acquired primary context information in column (3) in Table \ref{Tbl:Evaluation_of_Previous_Research_Efforts}.
\begin{figure}[!b]
\centering
\vspace{-0.43cm}
\includegraphics[scale=0.55]{./Images/16_9_Secondary_Context.pdf}
\caption{(a) User interface provided to the users, in this case parents by \textit{Mimo Smart Baby Monitor} (mimobaby.com). All the raw information collected are presented to the users, using graphs, figures and icons, after generating secondary context information. (b) Illustrates how primary context has been collected and transferred through the infrastructure to discover secondary context information.}
\label{Figure:Secondary_Context}
\end{figure}
Secondary context is any information that can be computed using primary context. The secondary context can be computed by using sensor data fusion operations or data retrieval operations such as web service calls (e.g. identify the distance between two sensors by applying sensor data fusion operations on two raw GPS sensor values). Further, retrieved context such as phone numbers, addresses, email addresses, birthdays, list of friends from a contact information provider based on a personal identity as the primary context can also be identified as secondary context. For example, \textit{Mimo} (mimobaby.com) has built a smart nursery system, where parents learn new insights about their baby through connected products like the \textit{Mimo Smart Baby Monitor}. In this product, \textit{turtle} is the device that collects all primary context information. Then the data is transferred to an intermediary devices called \textit{lilypad}. Such responsibility offloading strategy allows to reduce the \textit{turtle}'s weight at minimum level and to increase the battery life. the communication and processing capabilities are offloaded to the \textit{lilypad} device which can be easiy recharged when necessary. We can see \textit{Mimo Smart Baby Monitor} usees some parts of the data flow architecture we presented in Figure \ref{Tbl:Evaluation_of_Previous_Research_Efforts}. User interface provided by Mimo and the data flow within the solution is presented in Figure \ref{Figure:Secondary_Context}. Cloud services \cite{IA02} performs the additional processing and summarised data is pushed to the mobile devices for context presentation. In the user interface, parents are presented mostly the secondary context information such as baby movement or baby's sleeping status. Accelerometer sensors are used to discover such secondary context information using pattern recognition techniques. We list secondary context information generated by IoT solutions in column (4) in Table \ref{Tbl:Evaluation_of_Previous_Research_Efforts}.
\begin{figure}[!b]
\centering
\includegraphics[scale=0.50]{./Images/16_5_Context_Presentation.pdf}
\caption{The \textit{Fitbit} web based dashboard displays recent activity level and lots of other statistics using graphics, charts, and icons.}
\label{Figure:Context_Presentation}
\end{figure}
\subsubsection{Context Selection and Presentation Section}
There are number of commonly used strategies, by most of the IoT solutions in the marketplace, to present context to the users.
Most of the IoT products use some kind of visualization techniques to present context information the users. We call this \textit{visual presentation}. For example, \textit{Fitbit} (fitbit.com) is a device that can be worn on multiple body parts in order to tracks steps taken, stairs climbed, calories burned, and hours slept, distance travelled, quality of sleep. This device collects data and present it to the users through mobile devices and web interfaces. Figure \ref{Figure:Context_Presentation} illustrates the context presentation of \textit{Fitbit}. Variety of different charts, graphs, icons and other types of graphical elements are heavily used to summarise and present analysed meaningful actionable data to the users. such visualization strategies are commonly encouraged in human computer interaction domain specially due to the fact that \textit{'a picture is worth a thousand words'}. We denote the presence of virtual presentation related to each IoT product using (\checkmark) in column (5) in Table \ref{Tbl:Evaluation_of_Previous_Research_Efforts}.
IoT solutions in the market place also employ different commonly used devices to present the context to the users. Typically, an IoT solution offers context presentation and selection via some kind of software application. Some of the commonly used presentation channels are web-based (W), mobile-based (M), desktop-based (D), and objects-based (O). First, three mediums describes themselves. Object-based means that context selection and presentation is done through a custom IoT device itself. Sample IoT solutions that use object-base presentation strategy are presented in Figure \ref{Figure:Object_based}. We identify the presence of different presentation channels related to each IoT product in column (6) in Table \ref{Tbl:Evaluation_of_Previous_Research_Efforts}.
\begin{figure}[!h]
\centering
\includegraphics[scale=0.36]{./Images/16_10_Object_based.pdf}
\caption{(a) Smart Oven (maidoven.com), (b) Smart Fridge (lg.com/us/discover/smartthinq/refrigerator), (c) Smart Washing machine (lg.com/us/discover/smartthinq/laundry). Some of the commonly used objects in households are not enriched with presentation capabilities such as touch screens. In such circumstances context selection and presentation responsibilities can be offloaded to commonly used devices such as smart-phones and tablets.}
\label{Figure:Object_based}
\end{figure}
In addition to the context presentation channels, IoT solutions use number of user interaction mechanisms such as voice (V), gesture (G), touch (T). Over last few years, we have seen more and more voice activated IoT solutions are coming to the marketplace. For example, latest technological development such as natural language processing and semantic technologies have enabled the wide use of voice activated IoT solutions. \textit{Amazon Echo} (amazon.com/oc/echo), \textit{Ubi} (theubi.com) are two voice activated personnel assistant solutions. Typically, they are capable of answering user queries related to weather, maps, traffic and so on (i.e. commonly asked questions). They are designed to learn from user interactions and customize their services and predictive models based on the user behaviour and preferences. These solutions have gone beyond what typical smart phone assistants such as \textit{Google One}, \textit{Microsoft Cortana}, \textit{Apple Siri} has to offer. For example, \textit{Ubi} has the cabability to interact with other smart objects in the smart house environment.
More importantly products such as \textit{Ivee} (helloivee.com), a voice controlled hub for smart homes, facilitates interoperability over the other IoT products in the markets. This means that consumers can use \textit{Ivee} to control other IoT products \textit{Iris} (irissmarthome.com), \textit{Nest} (nest.com), \textit{Philips Hue} (meethue.com), \textit{SmartThings} (smartthings.com), and Belkin WeMo (belkin.com). We discuss interoperability matters in details in Section \ref{sec:Lessons_Learned}. In addition to centralizes home hubs based IoT systems, more and more standalone IoT products also support voice-activated interaction such as executing commands. For example, \textit{VOCCA} (voccalight.com) is a plug \& play voice activated light bulb adapter requires no WiFi, no set-up, no installation.
Gesture has also been used to enable the interactions between IoT products and users. For example \textit{Myo} (thalmic.com/en/myo/) is a wearable armband that can be used to issues gesture base commands. \textit{Myo} reads gestures and motion and let hte users to seamlessly control smart phones, presentations, and so on. \textit{Nod} (hellonod.com) is the a advanced gesture control ring. It allows users to engage objects with user movements. Nod can be considered as a universal controller, allowing effortless communication with all of the smart devices in users connected life, including phones, tablets, \textit{Google Glass}, watches, home appliances, TVs, computers and more. We identify the presence of different user interaction mechanisms related to each IoT product in column (7) in Table \ref{Tbl:Evaluation_of_Previous_Research_Efforts}.
IoT solutions process data in different locations in their data communication flow as shown in Figure \ref{Figure:Context_aware_Big_Picture}. Sometimes data is processed within the sensors or the local processing devices. In other circumstances, data is sent to the cloud for processing. Deepening the applications and functionalities each IoT solution tries to provide, data may be processed in real-time (RT) or later (A). Specially, event detection based IoT systems need to act in real-time which requires real-time processing. For example, IoT solutions such as \textit{Mimo} smart baby monitor performs data processing in real-time as their mission is to increase the health and safety of the toddlers. It is also important to note that not every solution requires data archival. For example, health and fitness related IoT products can be benefited from archiving historic data. Such archives data will allow to produce graphs and charts over time and provide more insights and recommendations t the consumers. More data also facilitates more accurate prediction. However. storing more data cost more and not every solution requires such storage. \textit{ShutterEaze} (shuttereaze.com) makes it easy for anyone to add remote control functionality and automate their existing interior plantation shutters. For example, IoT product like this will not necessarily be benefited by archiving historic data. Still it can learn user behaviour over time (based on how users use the product), and automate the task without storing data. We identify the usage of real-time and archival techniques in column (8) in Table \ref{Tbl:Evaluation_of_Previous_Research_Efforts}.
IoT solutions mainly use three different reaction mechanisms. Most commonly used mechanism is notification (N). This means that when a certain condition is met, IoT solution will release a notification to the users explaining the context. For example, \textit{Mimo} (mimobaby.com), the baby monitoring product we mentioned earlier, notifies the parents when the baby shows any abnormal movements or breathing patterns. Parent will receive the notification through their smart phone. Some IoT solutions may react by performing actuations (A). For example, \textit{Blossom} (myblossom.com) ia a smart watering products that can be self-programmed based on real-time weather data and gives the user control over the phone, lowering the water bill up to 30\%. In this kind of scenario, the product may autonomously perform the actuations (i.e. open and close sprinklers) based on the context information. Another reaction mechanism used by IoT solutions is providing recommendations (R). For example, \textit{MAID} (maidoven.com) has a personalization engine that continuously learns about the users. MAID learns what users cook regularly, tracks users activity using data from smart phones and smart watches. Then, it will provide recommendations for a healthy balanced diet. \textit{MAID} also recommends users to workout or to go for a run based on the calories they consume each day. We identify the usage of reaction mechanisms related to each IoT product in column (9) in Table \ref{Tbl:Evaluation_of_Previous_Research_Efforts}.
\begin{table*}[t]
\centering
\footnotesize
\caption{Summary of the Evaluation Framework Used in Table~\ref{Tbl:Evaluation_of_Previous_Research_Efforts}}
\vspace{-0.3cm}
\begin{tabular}{ c l m{13cm} }
\hline
& Taxonomy / Feature & Description \\ \hline \hline
1 & Product and Web link & The name of the IoT product or the solution sorted by `Category' and then by `Project Name' within each category in ascending order.\\
2 & Category & Category that the solution belongs to.
Each category is denoted by a different colour:
\iftrue
red {\color{SC}\rule{0.2cm}{0.2cm}} (smart city), yellow
{\color{SN}\rule{0.2cm}{0.2cm}} (smart environment), blue {\color{SE}\rule{0.2cm}{0.2cm}} (smart enterprise), green {\color{SW}\rule{0.2cm}{0.2cm}} (smart wearable), and purple {\color{SH}\rule{0.2cm}{0.2cm}} (smart home).
\else
red \catC (smart city), yellow \catV (smart environment), blue \catN (smart enterprise), green \catW (smart wearable), and purple \catH (smart home).
\fi
Some solutions belongs to multiple categories.\\
3 & Primary Context & Major context data captured by IoT solutions.
\\
4 & Secondary Context & Major secondary context generated by the IoT solution.
\\
5 & Visual Presentation & We denote the presence of visual context presentation using a (\checkmark). \\
6 & Presentation Channels & We identify a number of commonly used presentation channels as follows: Web-based (W), Mobile-based (M), Desktop-based (D), Object-based (O). Please note that web based channels can be accessed through both mobile and desktop devices. However, we consider web-based as a separate category while native mobile apps considered as mobile based and native desktop apps consider as desktop-based.\\
7 & User Interaction Mechanism & We identify Touch (T), Gesture (G), and Voice (V) as three commonly used user interaction mechanism. Interactions done through a PC or a smart phone is denoted by (M). Touch (T) refers to the \textit{`user touching a physical product'}. It does not refer to the user interaction using touch enabled devices such as smart phones.\\
8 & Real-Time or Archival & Some IoT solutions processes data in real-time (RT) and other process archival data (A). \\
9 & Reaction Mechanism & IoT products use different reaction mechanisms. Some of them release notifications (N). Some solutions provides recommendation (R) to the users on how to react to a certain situation. Some IoT products perform physical actuations (A).\\
10 & Learning Ability & Some solutions are capable of learning by analysing user behaviours and other inputs over time. such machine leaning ability is denoted by (ML). Other solutions require specific instruction from users typically using IF-ELSE-THEN mechanism. Such user defined approach is denoted using (UD). \\
11 & Notification Execution & In IoT products, notifications are released based in different conditions as follows: Temporal (T), Spatial (S), Event (E). Notification could be in any form such as SMS, email, sound, vibration and so on.\\
\\ \hline
\multicolumn{3}{c}{Note: Cases where sufficient information were not available are denoted by (-). Further, ($\times$) denote the unavailability of a certain feature.}
\end{tabular}
\label{Tbl:Summarized_taxonmy}
\end{table*}
Another important factor we identified during the product review is the learn-ability. Some products are capable of recording user provided inputs and other autonomously gathered information to predict future behaviours. In computer science, such behaviour is identified as machine learning (ML). For example, \textit{Nest} (nest.com) thermostat is capable of learning users' schedules and the temperatures users prefer. It keeps users comfortable and saves energy when they are away. In contrast, products such as \textit{Fibaro} (fibaro.com) requires users to explicitly defines (UD) event thresholds and triggers as shown in Figure \ref{Figure:Manual_Execution}. We review the learn-ability of each IoT product in column (10) in Table \ref{Tbl:Evaluation_of_Previous_Research_Efforts}.
\begin{figure}[!h]
\centering
\includegraphics[scale=0.65]{./Images/16_11_Manual_Execution.pdf}
\caption{Two scenarios defined using \textit{Fibaro} (fibaro.com) platforms. The screen-shots show how different types of context triggered can be defined by combining sensors, actuators and predefined parameters.}
\label{Figure:Manual_Execution}
\end{figure}
There are number of different ways that an IoT product would trigger a certain reaction. It is important to note that a single IoT solution may combine multiple triggers together in order to facilitate complex requirements. Some rigger may be spacial (S), temporal (T), or event based (E). Event based triggers are the most commonly used mechanism. For example, the IoT products such as \textit{SmartThings} (smartthings.com), \textit{Ninja Blocks} (ninjablocks.com), \textit{Fibaro} (fibaro.com), \textit{Twine} (supermechanical.com) allow users to define contextual triggers using sensors, actuators and parameters. Figure \ref{Figure:Manual_Execution} and Figure \ref{Figure:Event_Trigger} shows how two different products define events.
\begin{figure}[!b]
\centering
\includegraphics[scale=0.34]{./Images/16_12_Event_Trigger.pdf}
\caption{\textit{Twine} (supermechanical.com) provides a user interface to define scenarios by combining sensors and actuators in a WHEN-THEN fashion which is also similar to the IF-THEN mechanism. \textit{Twine} will trigger the actuation accordingly when conditions are met.}
\label{Figure:Event_Trigger}
\end{figure}
Low powered bluetooth beacons are commonly used in IoT products, specially in commercial and retail sector for both localization and location-based advertising \cite{IA002}. For example, \textit{XY} (xyfindit.com) and \textit{Estimote} (estimote.com) are two similar products in the IoT marketplace that provide small beacons that can be attached to any location or object. The beacons will broadcast tiny radio signals which smart phones can receive and interpret, unlocking micro-location and contextual awareness. Therefore, IoT products may trigger a reaction when either users entering into or going out from a certain area. There are some other products such as \textit{FiLIP} (myfilip.com) which users location-aware triggers to make sure children are staying within safe area. \textit{FiLIP} uses a unique blend of GPS, GSM, and WiFi to allow parents to locate their child using the most accurate location information, both indoors and outdoors. Parents can create a virtual radius around a location, such as home, school or a friend's house. Further, parents can set up to five such safe zones using the \textit{FiLIP} app. A notification will be sent to the parent's smart phone when \textit{FiLIP} detects that the child has entered or left a safe zone.
In temporal mechanism, trigger is release based on a time schedule. Temporal triggers may refer to time as time of the day (e.g. exactly: 10.30 am or approximately: morning), day of the week (e.g. Monday or weekend), week of the month (e.g. second week), month of the year (e.g January), season (e.g. winter). Figure \ref{Figure:Manual_Execution} show how \textit{Fibaro} system allows to define a trigger by incorporating temporal triggers. IoT products such as \textit{Nest} thermostat also use temporal triggers to efficiently learn and manager energy consumption.
\section{Review of IoT Solutions}
\label{sec:Review}
In this section we evaluated variety of different IoT solutions in the marketplace based on the evaluation framework presented in the earlier section. Table \ref{Tbl:Summarized_taxonmy}, summarises the evaluation framework used and Table \ref{Tbl:Evaluation_of_Previous_Research_Efforts} presents the IoT product review results.
\begin{table*}[t!]
\caption{Evaluation of Surveyed Research Prototypes, Systems, and Approaches}
\footnotesize
\renewcommand{\arraystretch}{0.8}
\begin{tabular}{
p{2.5cm}
c
m{2.8cm}
m{2.8cm}
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
}
\hline
\begin{minipage}[b]{2.0cm}[Project Type] Project Name (Web Link) \end{minipage} &
\begin{sideways}Category \end{sideways} &
\begin{minipage}[b]{2.0cm}Primary Context \end{minipage} &
\begin{minipage}[b]{2.2cm}Secondary Context \end{minipage} &
\begin{sideways}\begin{minipage}[b]{1.4cm}Visual \\Presentation\end{minipage} \end{sideways} &
\begin{sideways}\begin{minipage}[b]{1.4cm}Presentation Channel\end{minipage} \end{sideways} &
\begin{sideways}\begin{minipage}[b]{1.4cm}User \\Interaction\end{minipage} \end{sideways} &
\begin{sideways}\begin{minipage}[b]{1.4cm}Real-Time \\ Archival \end{minipage} \end{sideways} &
\begin{sideways}\begin{minipage}[b]{1.4cm}Notification \\ Mechanism \end{minipage} \end{sideways} & \begin{sideways}\begin{minipage}[b]{1.4cm}Learning Ability \end{minipage} \end{sideways} &
\begin{sideways}\begin{minipage}[b]{1.4cm}Notification Execution \end{minipage} \end{sideways}
\\
\hline \hline
(1) & (2) & (3) & (4) &(5) & (6) & (7) & (8) & (9) & (10) & (11) \\
[Waste Management] Enevo (enevo.com) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SC}{}} & Waste fill-level & Efficient routes to pick-up waste, schedules & \checkmark & W & M & RT, A & N, R & ML, UD & E \\
[Indoor Localization] Estimote (estimote.com) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SC}{}} & Bluetooth signal strength, Beacon ID & Location, Distance & \checkmark & M & M & RT & N, R & UD & T, S, E \\
[Parking Slot Management] ParkSight (streetline.com) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SC}{}} & Sound level, Road surface temperature & Route for free parking slot & \checkmark & M, W & M & RT, A & N, R & ML, UD & T, S, E \\
[Street Lighting] Tvilight (tvilight.com) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SC}{}} & Light, Presence, Local information such as weather changes, special events, emergency situations & Energy consumption, Energy usage patterns, Lamp failure detection & \checkmark & W & M & RT, A & N, A & ML, UD & T, S, E \\
[Crowed Movement Analysis] SceneTap (scenetap.com) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SC}{}} & GPS, Video & Crowd profiling at a given location & \checkmark & M, W, D & M & RT & N, A & ML & T, S \\
[Foot Traffic Monitoring] Scanalyticsinc (scanalyticsinc.com) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SC}{}} & Floor level & Heat maps to understand customer movements & \checkmark & W & T, M & RT, A & N & ML, UD & S, E \\
[Crowed Analysis] Livehoods (livehoods.org) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SC}{}} & \textit{Foursquare} check-ins cloud service & Social dynamics, structure, and character of cities on large scale & \checkmark & W & M & RT, A & - & ML & E \\
[Crowed Analysis] Placemeter (placemeter.com) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SC}{}} & Location, Video & Crowed movement & \checkmark & M & M & RT & - & ML & E \\
[Fire Safety] Fire Extinguishers (engaugeinc.net) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SE}{}} & Pressure gauge, Motion & Fire extinguisher usage patterns, Storage quality & \checkmark & W & M & RT, A & N & UD & S, E \\
[Foot Traffic Monitoring] Motionloft (motionloft.com) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SE}{}} & Video, Motion & Location, Movement direction, Predict pedestrian and vehicle traffic & \checkmark & W & M & RT, A & N & ML, UD & E \\
[Indoor Localization] Museum Analytics (artprocessors.net) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SE}{}} & Bluetooth signal strength, Beacon ID & Location, Distance & \checkmark & W & M & RT & N & UD & S, E \\
[Supply Chain Management] SenseAware (senseaware.com) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SE}{}} & GPS, Temperature, Humidity, Light, Pressure & Shipment quality & \checkmark & W & M & RT, A & N & UD & S, E \\
[Manufacturing Process Management] Sight Machine (sightmachine.com) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SE}{}} & Video, Mechanical movements of Robots & Quality and efficiency of manufacturing operations & \checkmark & W & M & RT, A & N & ML, UD & E \\
[Concrete Structure Health Monitoring] Smart Structures (smart-structures-inc.us) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SE}{}} & Accelerometers, Strain gages, Temperature & Real-time load capacity, construction quality & \checkmark & D & M & RT, A & N & UD & E \\
[Smart Pallet] (igps.net) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SE}{}} & RFID, Barcode & Identify item using Global Returnable Asset Identifier (GRAI) & - & W & M & RT & N & - & S, E \\
[Order Picking Glass] SmartPick (smartpick.be) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SE}{}} & Video, Barcode & Identify products, Identify the tasks to perform related to each object & \checkmark & O & T, G & RT & N, R & - & S, E \\
[Environmental Monitoring] AirCasting (aircasting.org) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SN}{}} & Sound levels, Temperature, Humidity, CO, NO$_{2}$ & Air quality maps & \checkmark & O, M, W & T, M & RT, A & N, R & UD, ML & E \\
\hline
\label{Tbl:Evaluation_of_Previous_Research_Efforts}
\end{tabular}
\end{table*}
\begin{table*}[t!]
\footnotesize
\renewcommand{\arraystretch}{0.8}
\begin{tabular}{
p{2.5cm}
c
m{2.8cm}
m{2.8cm}
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
}
\hline
\begin{minipage}[b]{2.0cm}[Project Type] Project Name (Web Link) \end{minipage} &
\begin{sideways}Category \end{sideways} &
\begin{minipage}[b]{2.0cm}Primary Context \end{minipage} &
\begin{minipage}[b]{2.2cm}Secondary Context \end{minipage} &
\begin{sideways}\begin{minipage}[b]{1.4cm}Visual \\Presentation\end{minipage} \end{sideways} &
\begin{sideways}\begin{minipage}[b]{1.4cm}Presentation Channel\end{minipage} \end{sideways} &
\begin{sideways}\begin{minipage}[b]{1.4cm}User \\Interaction\end{minipage} \end{sideways} &
\begin{sideways}\begin{minipage}[b]{1.4cm}Real-Time \\ Archival \end{minipage} \end{sideways} &
\begin{sideways}\begin{minipage}[b]{1.4cm}Notification \\ Mechanism \end{minipage} \end{sideways} & \begin{sideways}\begin{minipage}[b]{1.4cm}Learning Ability \end{minipage} \end{sideways} &
\begin{sideways}\begin{minipage}[b]{1.4cm}Notification Execution \end{minipage} \end{sideways}
\\
\hline \hline
(1) & (2) & (3) & (4) &(5) & (6) & (7) & (8) & (9) & (10) & (11) \\
[Air Quality Monitor] Air Quality Egg (airqualityegg.com) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SN}{}} & NO$_{2}$, CO, O$_{3}$, Volatile Organic Compounds, Radiation, Dust particulars & Air quality maps & \checkmark & W & M & RT, A & N & UD & E \\
[Public Sensor Infrastructure] Array of Things (arrayofthings.github.io) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SN}{}} & Temperature, Humidity, Light, CO ,NO$_{2}$, vibration, Volatile organic compounds, O$_{3}$, CO$_{2}$, SO, Dust particulars, Sound, infra-red images, Precipitation and wind measurements & Climate trends, Air quality & - & M & M & RT, A & - & - & E \\
[Smart Farming] Bumblebee project (niksargent.com/bumblebee) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SN}{}} & Video, Audio, Temperature, Sunlight, Weather & Model bees' life styles and behaviour & \checkmark & D & - & A & N & - & - \\
[Smart River Management] Floating Sensor Network (float.berkeley.edu) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SN}{}} & GPS, Temperature, Salinity & Maps of water movement, Hydrodynamic modelling. & \checkmark & W & M & RT, A & N & ML & E \\
[Floot Detection] Oxford Flood Network (oxfloodnet.co.uk) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SN}{}} & Temperature, Ultrasonic, Wet sensor & Flood detection and prediction & \checkmark & W & M & RT, A & N & ML, UD & E \\
[Weather Monitor] PressureNet (pressurenet.cumulonimbus.ca) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SN}{}} & Barometer, GPS & Weather Forecast & \checkmark & M & M & RT, A & N & ML, UD & E \\
[Waste Management] Smart Belly (bigbelly.com) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SN}{}} & Waste fill-level & Efficient routes to pick-up waste & \checkmark & M, W & M & RT, A & N, R & ML, UD & S, E \\
[Environment Monitor] Tzoa (mytzoa.com) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SN}{}} & Air Quality, UV, Temperature, Humidity, Light & Air Quality in streets, Indoor air quality maps & \checkmark & O, M & M & RT, A & N, R & UD & E \\
[Weather Monitor] (uniform.net) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SN}{}} & - & Retrieve weather information from Web a service & $ \times $ & O & T & RT, A & N, A & ML & E \\
[Sleep Monitor] Beddit (beddit.com) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SW}{}} & Force sensor, Heart rate sensor & Heart rate, Respiration, Sleep cycles, Sleep time & \checkmark & O, M & T, M & A & N, R & ML, UD & T, E \\
[Health Monitor] BioHarness (zephyranywhere.com) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SW}{}} & GPS, ECG, Heart rate & Breathing rate, Posture, Activity level, Peak Acceleration, Speed, Distance & \checkmark & O, M, W, D & T, M & RT, A & N, R & ML, UD & E \\
[Remote Health Monitor] BodyGuardian (preventice.com) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SW}{}} & ECG, Biometric Sensors & Health report & \checkmark & O, M, W & T, M & RT, A & N, R & ML, UD & T, E \\
[Smart Ring] Electricfoxy (electricfoxy.com) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SW}{}} & 3-Axis accelerometer, Heart rate, GPS & Heart condition, Calories Burned & \checkmark & O M & T, M & RT & N & ML, UD & T, S, E \\
[Health-Fitness Tracker] Fitbit (fitbit.com) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SW}{}} & 3-Axis accelerometer & Steps, Distance, Calories Burned, Floors Climbed, Sleep Tracking & \checkmark & O, M, W & T, M & RT, A & N, R & ML, UD & T, S, E \\
[Emergency Helmet] ICEdot (icedot.org) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SW}{}} & Users' medication, Users' personal allergies & Location & \checkmark & M & M & RT, A & N, A & UD & E \\
[Fitness Tracker] Lark (lark.com) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SW}{}} & Accelerometers, Gravity, Gyroscopes, Rotational vector, Orientation, Magnetometers & Activity recognition, Calories burned & \checkmark & M & M & RT, A & N, R & UD & T, E \\
[Sport Watch] Leikr (leikr.com) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SW}{}} & GPS, Heart Rate & Distance, Calories burned, Speed, Average pace per lap, Lap distance, Lap calories & \checkmark & O & T & RT, A & N, R & UD & T, S, E \\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\end{table*}
\begin{table*}[t!]
\footnotesize
\renewcommand{\arraystretch}{0.8}
\begin{tabular}{
p{2.5cm}
c
m{2.8cm}
m{2.8cm}
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
}
\hline
\begin{minipage}[b]{2.0cm}[Project Type] Project Name (Web Link) \end{minipage} &
\begin{sideways}Category \end{sideways} &
\begin{minipage}[b]{2.0cm}Primary Context \end{minipage} &
\begin{minipage}[b]{2.2cm}Secondary Context \end{minipage} &
\begin{sideways}\begin{minipage}[b]{1.4cm}Visual \\Presentation\end{minipage} \end{sideways} &
\begin{sideways}\begin{minipage}[b]{1.4cm}Presentation Channel\end{minipage} \end{sideways} &
\begin{sideways}\begin{minipage}[b]{1.4cm}User \\Interaction\end{minipage} \end{sideways} &
\begin{sideways}\begin{minipage}[b]{1.4cm}Real-Time \\ Archival \end{minipage} \end{sideways} &
\begin{sideways}\begin{minipage}[b]{1.4cm}Notification \\ Mechanism \end{minipage} \end{sideways} & \begin{sideways}\begin{minipage}[b]{1.4cm}Learning Ability \end{minipage} \end{sideways} &
\begin{sideways}\begin{minipage}[b]{1.4cm}Notification Execution \end{minipage} \end{sideways}
\\
\hline \hline
(1) & (2) & (3) & (4) &(5) & (6) & (7) & (8) & (9) & (10) & (11) \\
[Activity Tracker] Lumoback (lumobodytech.com) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SW}{}} & 3-Axis Accelerometer & Posture steps, Distance travelled, Activity recognition, Calories burned & \checkmark & O, M, D & T, M & RT, A & N, R & UD & T, E \\
[Baby Monitor] Mimo (mimobaby.com) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SW}{}} & 3-Axis Accelerometer, Audio, Respiration & Baby sleep status, Respiration patterns, Baby's body position & \checkmark & M, W & T, M & RT, A & N & UD & E \\
[Health Monitor] MyBasis (mybasis.com) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SW}{}} & Heart rate, Galvanic skin response, Skin temperature, 3-Axis Accelerometer & Activity, Health, Calories & \checkmark & O, M & T, M & RT, A & N, R & ML & E \\
[Medical Jacket] MyTJacket (mytjacket.com) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SW}{}} & Pressure & Activity level & \checkmark & M, W & T, M & RT, A & N, A & ML, UD & E \\
[Security Authenticator] Nymi (nymi.com) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SW}{}} & Heart activity & Personal Identity & \checkmark & O & T, M & - & N & - & E \\
[Sport Goggles] Oakley (oakley.com) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SW}{}} & GPS, 3-Axis Accelerometer
3-Axis Gyroscope, 3-Axis Magnetometer, Temperature, Barometric Pressure & Speed, Track friends, Navigation maps, Jump Analytic & \checkmark & O, M, W & T, M & RT, A & N, R, A & UD, ML & T, S, E \\
[Sports Helmet] TheShockBox (theshockbox.com) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SW}{}} & Accelerometer, Rotation, Pressure & Hit direction, Force estimation, Hit count & \checkmark & M, W & T, M & RT, A & N, R & UD & E \\
[Sport Assistant] Zepp (zepp.com) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SW}{}} & Dual accelerometers
3-Axis Gyroscope & 3D swing, Club speed, Swing plane, Tempo, Backswing position, Hip rotation & \checkmark & M & T, M & RT, A & N,R & ML,UD & E \\
[Indoor Air Quality Monitor] Alima (getalima.com) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SH}{}} & Volatile organic compounds, CO$_{2}$, CO, Temperature, Humidity, Accelerometer, & Indoor air quality prediction & \checkmark & O, M, W & M & RT, A & N & ML & E \\
[Smart Locator] BiKN (bikn.com) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SH}{}} & Beacon signal strength & Distance, Geo-fencing & \checkmark & O,M & T, M & RT, A & N & UD & S \\
[Family Connections] Good Night Lamp (goodnightlamp.com) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SH}{}} & $ \times $ & $ \times $ & $ \times $ & O & T & RT, A & A & $ \times $ & $ \times $ \\
[Light Bulb] Hue Bulb (meethue.com) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SH}{}} & $ \times $ & $ \times $ & \checkmark & M & M & $ \times $ & A & UD & $ \times $ \\
[Door Lock] Lockitron (lockitron.com) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SH}{}} & GPS, Person ID & Identify family and friends & \checkmark & O, M & M & - & A & - & T, S, E \\
[Smart Thermostat] Nest (nest.com) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SH}{}} & Temperature & Efficient heating schedule, Heat up and cool down time calculation & \checkmark & O, M & T, M & RT & A & ML & E \\
[Smart Home] Ninja Blocks (ninjablocks.com) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SH}{}} & Motion, Moisture, Temperature, Light, Humidity, Presence [extendible] & Energy usage, Indoor localization & \checkmark & M & V, M & RT & N, R, A & UD & T, S, E \\
[Weather Station] Netatmo (netatmo.com) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SH}{}} & Temperature, Humidity, Air quality, CO$_{2}$, Sound, Pressure & Weather prediction & \checkmark & M, W & M & RT & N & UD & E \\
[Smart Scale] Withings (withings.com) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SH}{}} & Weight, Body composition, Heart rate, Temperature, CO$_{2}$ & Body Mass Index, Air quality, Automatic user recognition & \checkmark & M, W & M & RT, A & N, R, A & UD & $ \times $ \\
[Smart Home] SmartThings (smartthings.com) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SH}{}} & Motion, Moisture, Temperature, Light, Humidity, Presence [extendible] & Energy usage, Indoor localization & \checkmark & M & V, M & RT & N, R, A & UD & T, S, E \\
[Thermostat] Tado (tado.com) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SH}{}} & Temperature, GPS, Weather forecast & Efficient heating schedule , User location prediction & \checkmark & M & M & RT, A & N, A & ML, UD & T, S \\
[Smart Cooking] Twine (supermechanical.com) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SH}{}} & Moisture, Magnetism, Temperature, Vibration, Orientation & Recommendation to cook meat & \checkmark & M, W & M & RT, A & N & UD & T, S, E \\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\end{table*}
\begin{table*}[t!]
\footnotesize
\renewcommand{\arraystretch}{0.8}
\begin{tabular}{
p{2.5cm}
c
m{2.8cm}
m{2.4cm}
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
}
\hline
\begin{minipage}[b]{2.0cm}[Project Type] Project Name (Web Link) \end{minipage} &
\begin{sideways}Category \end{sideways} &
\begin{minipage}[b]{2.0cm}Primary Context \end{minipage} &
\begin{minipage}[b]{2.2cm}Secondary Context \end{minipage} &
\begin{sideways}\begin{minipage}[b]{1.4cm}Visual \\Presentation\end{minipage} \end{sideways} &
\begin{sideways}\begin{minipage}[b]{1.4cm}Presentation Channel\end{minipage} \end{sideways} &
\begin{sideways}\begin{minipage}[b]{1.4cm}User \\Interaction\end{minipage} \end{sideways} &
\begin{sideways}\begin{minipage}[b]{1.4cm}Real-Time \\ Archival \end{minipage} \end{sideways} &
\begin{sideways}\begin{minipage}[b]{1.4cm}Notification \\ Mechanism \end{minipage} \end{sideways} & \begin{sideways}\begin{minipage}[b]{1.4cm}Learning Ability \end{minipage} \end{sideways} &
\begin{sideways}\begin{minipage}[b]{1.4cm}Notification Execution \end{minipage} \end{sideways}
\\
\hline \hline
(1) & (2) & (3) & (4) &(5) & (6) & (7) & (8) & (9) & (10) & (11) \\
[Personal Assistant] Ubi (theubi.com) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SH}{}} & Temperature, light, humidity, pressure & - & \checkmark & O, M, W & V & RT, A & N, R, A & ML, UD & T, S, E \\
[Power Plug] WeMo Switch (belkin.com) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SH}{}} & Temperature, energy consumption & Estimate Cost & \checkmark & M & T, M & RT, A & N, A & UD & T,E \\
[Family Connections] WhereDial (wheredial.com) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SH}{}} & GPS & location (e.g. pub, work, home) & $ \times $ & O & T & RT & N & $ \times $ & E \\
[Dog Activity Monitoring] Whistle (whistle.com) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SH}{}} & Accelerometer, location, person & Daily Activity Report (play time, rest time), Medical Recommendations, Excers & \checkmark & M & M & RT, A & N, R & ML & S \\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\end{table*}
\section{Lessons Learned, Opportunities and Challenges}
\label{sec:Lessons_Learned}
This section presents some major lessons we learnt during the IoT product review.
\subsection{Trends and Opportunities}
According to our survey on the IoT product marketplace, it is evident that the types of primary context information collected through sensors are mostly limited. However, the ways such collected data is been processed varied significantly based on the application and the required functionalities that the IoT product plan to offer. Therefore, it is important to understand that, in IoT, same data can be used to derive different insights in different domain. In combine, the IoT solutions have used around 30-40 different types of sensors to measure different parameters. The ability to derive different insights using same set of data validates the importance of sensing as a service model \cite{ZMP008}, which envisions to create a data market that buys and sells data.
Most of the IoT solutions have used some kind of context presentation technique that summarizes and converts the data into a easily understandable format. It is also important to note that, despite the advances in human computer interaction, most of the IoT solutions have only employed traditional computer screen-based technique. Only few IoT solutions really allow voice or object-based direct communications. However, most of the wearable solutions use touch as a common interaction technique. We also see a trend of smart home products also increasingly use touch-based interactions. Hands free voice or gesture based user interaction will help consumers to seamlessly integrate IoT products into their lives. At least, smart watches and glasses may help to reduce the distraction that smart phones may create when interacting with IoT products.
Most of the IoT products ends their services after releasing notification to the consumers. Users will need to perform the appropriate actuation tasks manually. Lack of standards in machine to machine (M2M) communication seems to play a significant role in this matter. We will discuss this issue in Section \ref{sec:Interoperability}. Finally, it is important to note that increasing number of IoT products use data analytic and reasoning in order to embed more intelligence to their products. As a result, there is a need for domain independent, easy to use (e.g. drag and drop configuration without any program coding) analytical frameworks with different characteristics where some may effectively perform on the cloud and the others may work efficiently in resource constrained devices. One solution in this space is Microsoft Azure Machine. Learning\footnote{http://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/services/machine-learning/}. Another generic framework is \textit{Wit}. \textit{Wit} (Wit.ai) is a natural language processing API for the IoT which allows developers to easily and quickly add natural language processing functionality to their IoT solutions.
It is important to note that most of the IoT solutions consider families or group of people as a whole, not as individuals. Therefore, most of the IoT solutions are unable to individually and separately identify father, mother or child living in a given house. For example, the temperature that individual family members would like to have can be different. However, most of the modern thermostat only consider context information such as past behaviour, time of the day, presence of a user, and so on. However, it cannot handle individual preferences of the family members. Therefore, embedding such capabilities to the IoT products would be a critical requirement to be successful in future IoT marketplace.
In order to support and encourage the adoption of IoT solution among consumers, it is important to make sure that the usage of products allows to recover the cost of product purchase within a reasonable time period. For example, the \textit{Nest} thermostat promises that consumers can recover its costs through reducing the energy bill. Auto-Schedule feature in \textit{Nest} makes it easy to create an energy efficient schedule that help the users to save up to 20\% on heating and cooling bills.
\subsection{Product Prototyping}
There are number of do-it-yourself (DIY) prototyping platforms available that allows to create IoT prototypes quickly and easily. Specially these platforms are cheaper and modular in nature. They allow anyone with a new idea to test their initial thoughts with very limited budget, resources, and more importantly less time. \textit{Arduino} (arduino.cc) (including variations such as \textit{Libelium} (libelium.com)), \textit{.NET Gargeteer} (netmf.com/gadgeteer), \textit{LittleBits} (littlebits.cc) are some well known prototyping platforms. Most of these products are open source in nature. More importantly over the last few years, they have become more interoperable which allows product designers to combine different prototyping platforms together. The programming mechanisms use to program these modules can be varied (e.g. C, C++, C\#, Java, Javascript, etc.). Some platforms provide easy and intuitive ways to write program such as mashing-ups and wirings as shown in Figure \ref{Figure:Prototyping_Tools}.
\begin{figure}[!b]
\centering
\includegraphics[scale=0.57]{./Images/16_3_Prototyping_Tools.pdf}
\caption{(a) Microsoft Visual Studio IDE that allows to visually wire \textit{.NET Gadgeteer} hardware components. The IDE automatically generated the code skeletons to make the prototyping much easier and faster, (b) Hardware sensors and actuators of \textit{LittleBits} (littlebits.cc) platform, (c) Wyliodrin web-based IDE that allows to program variety of different platforms including \textit{Arduino} (arduino.cc) and \textit{Raspberry Pi} (www.raspberrypi.org) by visually drag and drop programming components, (d) a \textit{Raspberry Pi} (www.raspberrypi.org), (e) \textit{Intel Edison} board.}
\label{Figure:Prototyping_Tools}
\vspace{-0.4cm}
\end{figure}
There are small computer systems been developed to support IoT prototyping. For example \textit{Raspberry Pi} (www.raspberrypi.org) is a such product. \textit{Raspberry Pi} is a credit card-sized single-board computer developed in the UK by the \textit{Raspberry Pi} Foundation with the intention of promoting the teaching of basic computer science in schools. However, more recently, \textit{Raspberry Pi}s are heavily used in IoT product prototype development. For example, IoT products such as \textit{NinjaBlocks} (ninjablocks.com) has used \textit{Raspberry Pi}s in their production officially. Further, most of the platforms such as \textit{Ardunio} can successfully work with \textit{Raspberry Pi} Computers. Recently, Intel has also produced a small computer (e.g. Intel Galileo and Intel Edison boards) competitive to \textit{Raspberry Pi} which runs both windows and Linux. The Intel Edison is a tiny computer offered by \textit{Intel} as a development system for wearable devices.
Programming IDE tools such \textit{Microsoft Visual Studio} provides significant support for IoT program development by facilitating visual wiring, mash ups and automated code generation. Such ease of programming and prototyping abilities have attracted significant attention from hobbyist, researcher, and even from school children.
These modular based prototyping tools allow to build and test context-aware functionalities efficiently and effectively. Most of these platforms offer large number of sensing modules that allow to collect data from different types sensors. As we mentioned earlier such data can be considered as primary context. Therefore, such primary context can be combined together to generate secondary context information. However, in most of the prototyping platforms, secondary context discovery needs to be done manually or using IF-ELSE statements. However, it would be much useful to develop a standard framework with modularity in mind to address this issue. These modules need to be defined in a standard form despite their differences in real implementations. Further, such context discovery modules should be able to combine together to discover more advance context information \cite{IA001}. We further explain how such framework should work in real world in Section \ref{sec:Resources}.
\subsection{Interoperability on Product and Services}
\label{sec:Interoperability}
Interoperability is a critical factor to be successful in IoT domain. Consumers typically do not want to stick into one single manufacturer or service provider. They always go for their preferences and for the factor which are more important to them such as cost, look and feel, customer service, functionality and so on. Interoperability among different IoT products and solutions allows consumers to move from one product to another or combine multiple products and services to build their smart environments as they like in a customize fashion. Further, interoperability \cite{IA07} is also important to eliminate market domination of large companies that increase the entry barriers for the small IoT product and service providers.
In IoT market place, interoperability is mainly achieved using three methods: 1) partnerships among product and service developers, 2) open and close standards, and 3) adaptors and mediator services. We have seen that major industrial players in the IoT marketplace stablish strategic partnerships with each other in order to enable interoperability among their product and services. However, this is not a scalable strategy to widely enable interoperability among IoT devices. Similarly, large corporations such as Apple (e.g. \textit{HomeKit}\footnote{developer.apple.com/homekit}, \textit{HealthKit}\footnote{developer.apple.com/healthkit}) and \textit{Google} (e.g. Fit\footnote{developers.google.com/fit}) are also attempting to build their own standards and interoperability certifications. This kind of interoperability may lead to corporate domination of IoT marketplace which could also hinder the innovation by small, medium, and start-up companies.
\begin{figure}[!t]
\centering
\includegraphics[scale=0.48]{./Images/16_6_Interoperability.pdf}
\caption{(a) shows how a recipe is structured using conditional statements and actions. (b) shows how recipes are built combining different triggers, actions, and channels.}
\label{Figure:Interoperability}
\end{figure}
To address the interoperability, there are some alliance have been initiated. For example \textit{AllSeen Alliance} (allseenalliance.org) has been created to promote some kind of interoperability among IoT consumer brands. \textit{AllSeen} has developed a standard software platform called \textit{AllJoyn}. \textit{AllJoyn} is a system that allows devices to advertise and share their abilities with other devices around them. A simple example would be a motion sensor letting a light bulb know no one is in the room it is lighting. This is the ideal approach the interoperability among IoT products. However, security \cite{IA03} and privacy in this framework need to be strengthen to avoid using interoperability features to attack IoT products by hackers or evil parties.
Another approach to enable interoperability among different IoT solutions is through adapter services. For example, \textit{IFTTT} (ifttt.com), If This Then That, is a web based service that allows users to create powerful connections, chains of simple conditional statements. One simple statement is illustrated in Figure \ref{Figure:Interoperability}. Channels are the basic building blocks of \textit{IFTTT}. Each Channel has its own \textit{Triggers} and \textit{Actions}. Some example Channels could be \textit{Facebook}, \textit{Twitter}, weather,\textit{ Android Wear}, and so on. Channel could be both hardware or software. Service providers and product manufactures need to register their services with \textit{IFTTT} once. After that anyone interested ca use that product or service as a channel to compose any recipe. Example list of channels are listed here: ifttt.com/channels. Personal recipes are combinations of a \textit{Trigger} and an \textit{Action} from active Channels. Example recipes are shown in Figure \ref{Figure:Interoperability}. For example, first recipe is defined to send a twitter message to a family member when the user reaches home. This kind of recipe can be used to offload responsibility from a child so the system automatically act on behalf of the child and sent a tweet to their parents. Context-aware recommendation can also help users to quickly configure channels in \textit{IFTTT}. Context could be location, time, family members around, IoT products located near by and so on. Context-aware recommendation \cite{IA003} can also be done by analysing similar users with similar smart environments.
\subsection{Resources and Energy Management}
\label{sec:Resources}
Most popular approach of energy management in IoT is through smart plugs. \textit{Plugwise} (shop.plugwise.com), \textit{Thinkecoinc} (shop.thinkecoinc.com), \textit{Belkin} (www.belkin.com) provide similar functionalities and services where they capture energy consumption using smart plugs. These solutions analyse data in many different ways and presented the context information to the users using variety of different charts and graphs. These plugs can also be used to home automation as they can be switched ON and OFF remotely or conditionally. For example, a condition would be temporal (i.e. time-aware behaviour) or spatial (i.e. location-aware behaviour).
There aren't any IoT solutions that focus on planning or deployment stages of smart environments. Analyse energy consumption is important in both industrial large scale deployments (e.g. waste management solutions discussed in \cite{ZMP008}) and in consumer based smart home and office deployments. Lets consider a smart home office planing and deployment scenario. At the moment, IoT marketplace is flooded with large number of IoT smart products that offer different functionalities. However, there aren't any method for consumers to measure or compare the benefits these products may offer and the associated costs such as cost of purchase, installation and maintains. Further, it is very hard to understand which solutions can work together and complement each other and which work standalone.
It is also difficult to understand where to install certain smart products and how many products are required to cover a certain area. (e.g. what are the ideal locations to install micro-climate sensors within a building which enable to accurately identify the micro-climate behaviour). Another issue would be to determine the coverage of a product. For example, how many motion sensors are required for a given home or office. Currently, to best of our knowledge, there is no such tool that can be used to achieve above planning and installation tasks. As we mentioned before, consumers are always eager to know the costs and benefits of a products. Therefore, it is important to facilitate some tools that can demonstrate cost benefit analysis (e.g. purchase cost, maintenance cost such as energy, energy saving and so on.). Context information will play a significant role in this kind of tools where consumers may need to input the budget, size of the building, their priorities and expectations. The tool will need to make recommendations to the consumers on which product to buy based on the product's technical specification and other consumers' reviews and comments.
The planing and installation becomes much more critical in industrial settings. Let considers the agricultural sensing scenario, the \textit{Phenonet} project, presented in \cite{ZMC008}. \textit{Phenonet} describes the network of sensors collecting information over a field of experimental crops. Researchers at the \textit{High Resolution Plant Phenomics Centre} \cite{P585} needs to monitor plant growth and performance information under different climate conditions over time.
It would be very valuable to have a tool that can help planning large scale sensor deployments. For example, energy predictive models will help the users to decide what kind of energy sources to be used and what kind of battery size to be used in each scenario. The amount of sensor nodes require to cover a curtain geographical area should be able to accurately predicted based on the context information using such tool. For example, in the agricultural sensing scenario, sensors deployments are planned by agricultural scientist who have little knowledge on electronic, communication, or energy consumption. Therefore, it is useful to have a user friendly tool that enables them to plot and visualise a large scale sensor deployment in virtual setting before getting into real world deployments. Perera et al. \cite{ZMC008} have present the agriculture scenario in detail.
Context information plays a critical role in sensor configuration in large scale sensor deployments in IoT. The objective of collecting sensor data is to understand the environment better by fusing and reasoning them. In order to accomplish this task, sensor data needs to be collected in a timely and location-sensitive manner. Each sensor needs to be configured by considering context information. Let us consider a scenario related to smart agriculture to understand why context matters in sensor configuration. \textit{Severe frosts and heat events can have a devastating effect on crops. Flowering time is critical for cereal crops and a frost event could damage the flowering mechanism of the plant. However, the ideal sampling rate could vary depending on both the season of the year and the time of day. For example, a higher sampling rate is necessary during the winter and the night. In contrast, lower sampling would be sufficient during summer and daytime. On the other hand, some reasoning approaches may require multiple sensor data readings. For example, a frost event can be detected by fusing air temperature, soil temperature, and humidity data. However, if the air temperature sensor stops sensing due to a malfunction, there is no value in sensing humidity, because frost events cannot be detected without temperature. In such circumstances, configuring the humidity sensor to sleep is ideal until the temperature sensor is replaced and starts sensing again}. Such intelligent (re-)configuration can save energy by eliminating ineffectual sensing and network communication.
An ideal tool should be able to simulate different types of user scenarios virtually before the real world deployments begin. Once deployed, another set of tools are required to advice and recommend, scientists and non-technical users, on configuring sensor parameters. Configuring sensors in a optimal fashion would lead to longer operation time while maintaining required accuracy. It is important to develop the tools in a modular and standard fashion so the manufacturers of each IoT solution can add their products into a library of product which enables consumers to easily select (may be drag and drop and visualize) the product they prefer for visualization purposes. Further, such tools will need to be able to combine different compatible products together autonomously based on context information such as budget, user preferences, and location information so the users will be offered different combinations to select from.
Resource management is also a critical task that need to be done optimally in IoT domain. Previously, we discussed how data may transferred over the network as well as through different types of data processing devices in Figure \ref{Figure:Context_aware_Big_Picture}. It is hard to determine the optimal location\footnote{the device that is responsible for processing data} to process data. Therefore, it is ideal to have a tool that is capable of evaluating a given software component\footnote{A self contained algorithm that may take primary context information as inputs and outputs secondary context information using any kind of data reasoning technique \cite{ZMP007}.} against a given computational network architecture and deciding which location is optimal to conduct any kind of reasoning based on user preferences, resource availability, context information availability, network communication availability and so on.
\subsection{Privacy and Data Analytic}
IoT marketplace is mainly composed with three parties, namely: device manufacturers, IoT cloud services and platform providers, and third party application developers [15]. All these parities need to consider privacy as a serious requirement and a challenge. In this section, we present some advice on preserving user privacy in IoT domain.
\textit{Device Manufacturers:} Device manufactures must embed privacy preserving techniques into their devices. Specially, manufactures must implement secure storage, data deletion, and control access mechanisms at the firmware level. Manufactures must also inform consumers about the type of data that are collected by the devices. Moreover, they must also explain what kind of data processing will be employed and how and when data would be extracted out of the devices. Next, the manufactures must also provide the necessary control for the consumers to disable any hardware components. For example, in an IoT security solution, consumers may prefer to disable the outside CCTV cameras when inside the home. However, consumers will prefer to keep both inside and outside cameras active when they leave the premises. Moreover, devices manufactures may also need to provide programming interface for third party developers to acquire data from the devices.
\textit{IoT Cloud Services and Platform Providers:} It is likely that most of the IoT solutions will have a cloud based service that is responsible for proving advance data analysis support for the local software platforms. It is very critical that such cloud providers use common standards, so that the consumers have a choice to decide which provider to use. Users must be able to seamlessly delete and move data from one provider to another over time. Such a possibility can only be achieved by following a common set of interfaces and data formats. Most of the cloud services will also use local software and hardware gateways such as mobile phones that act as intermediary controllers. Such devices can be used to encrypt data locally to improved security and to process and filter data locally to reduce the amount of data send to the cloud. Such methods will reduce the possibility of user privacy violation that can occur during the data transmission.
\textit{Third Part Application Developers:} Application developers have the responsibility to certify their apps to ensure that they do not contain any malware. Moreover, it is the developers' responsibility to ensure that they present clear and accurate information to the users to acquire explicit user consent. Some critical information are: (1) the task that the app performs, (2) the required data to accomplish the tasks, (3) hardware and software sensors employed, (4) kind of aggregation and data analysis techniques that the app will employ, (5) kind of knowledge that the app will derive by data processing.
Users need to be presented with a list of features that the application provides, and the authorization that the user needs to give to activate each of those features. The control must be given to the user to decide which feature they want to activate. Moreover, in the IoT, acquiring user consent should be a continuous and ongoing process. Consequently, the application developers must continuously allow the users to withdraw, grant, or change their consent. Moreover, users must be given full access to the data collected by the IoT devices.
\subsection{Central Hubs}
Central hubs are commonly used in IoT solutions. A typical IoT solution may comprises a number of different components. For example, an IoT solution may have sensors, actuators, processing and communication devices. Due to the nature, sensors and actuators may need to deploy in certain location manner (e.g. door sensor must mount on the door). As a result such sensors and actuators need to be small in size. Due to miniature size, it is not possible to enrich them with significant computational capacity. Similarly, most of the time these sensors and actuators would be battery powers (i.e. without having connected to permanent power sources). Therefore, energy management within those sensors and actuators is very critical. As a result, such smaller devices cannot perform significant data processing tasks. On the other hand, these individual devices have only limited knowledge about a given context. For example, a door sensors may only know about the current status of the door. The knowledge that can be derived from such limited amount of data is very constrained. In order to comprehensively understand a given situation, context data from number of sensors and actuators need to be collected, processed, and analysed. To address this issue, most of the IoT solutions have been used a central hubs (sometimes called `home hub') or similar solutions as shown in Figure \ref{Figure:Home_Hubs}.
Typically, central hubs are larger in size compared to sensors and actuators. Further, they are capable of communicating using multiple wireless protocols such as WiFi, WiFi-direct, Bluetooth ZigBee, Z-wave, and so on. They are also capable of storing data for a significant time period. Typically, only one central hub is required for a large area (e.g. house). These hubs may perform data processing and reasoning tasks (e.g. triggering IF-THEN rules). Further these hubs are typically connected to the cloud services. Dispite the differences in , in high-level, all of these hubs allows to add functionalities over time (i.e. extend the functionalities they may offer), through installing new applications. An app could be a IF-ELSE procedure that explain a certain contextual behaviour as illustrated in Figure \ref{Figure:Event_Trigger}.
\begin{figure}[!h]
\centering
\includegraphics[scale=0.48]{./Images/16_7_Home_Hubs.pdf}
\caption{Centralised Hubs are category of devices heavily used in IoT solution. (a) \textit{Ninja sphere} (b) \textit{ALYT} Hub powered by \textit{Andorid} (c) \textit{Samsung}'s \textit{SmartThing} Hub (d) Sensors and other components are connected to a centralised hub. These hubs are typically connected to permanent power sources and comprises comparatively high computational capabilities.}
\label{Figure:Home_Hubs}
\end{figure}
The problem in this approach is that each IoT solution designers are eager to design their own centralized hub. Such design approach significantly reduces the interoperability among different products and services in the IoT marketplace. These hubs are tend to use custom firmware and software framework stacks. Unlike operating systems, they are mostly designed to run under specific hardware platforms and configurations. As a result, it makes harder for other IoT solutions to use or utilize other centralized hubs in the marketplace. Centralized hubs typically does not have any user interface. They are controlled and managed using smart phones, tablets, or computers.
In order to stimulate the adoption of IoT solution among consumers, it is important to design a common software platform using common set of standard. The current mobile app market is an ideal model for IoT domains as well where users may install different applications in order to enhance their existing IoT products. Verification is required to check whether the required hardware devices is available to support the intended software application. This is similar to the some mobile app stores validate the phone specification before pushing the each app to a smart phone. In comparison to mobile phone domain, IoT domain is slightly complex where hardware also play a significant role. A one possible solution is to use hardware adaptors. This means when a IoT product manufacture wants to design a product that is interoperable with a another hub in the IoT marketplace, they need to design a hardware adaptor that may handle the interoperability using two-way conversions.
Finally, it is also important to highlight the necessity of intermediation nodes that can perform multi-protocol communication, bridging short range protocols, and protocol conversions \cite{Z1041}. For example, sensors that may use Bluetooth and ZigBee which can only communicate very short distance. To accommodate such sensors, intermediary nodes may be required. The intermediate nodes may install throughout a given location which may use with log range protocols to communicate with the central hub. The intermediate nodes may use short rage protocols to communicate with sensors and actuators.
\subsection{Legacy Devices}
Most of the IoT products in the marketplace comes with own hardware components and software stacks. However, we have increasingly seen that IoT solutions attempt to enrich legacy devices with smart capabilities. One very popular solution is \textit{Nest} (nest.com) thermostat. It has the capability to learn from users over time about their behaviour and preferences and control the temperature more efficiently and pro-actively. This thermostat can be installed by replacing the existing non-smart traditional thermostats. Everything else connected to the heating systems would work seamlessly. \textit{ShutterEaze} (shuttereaze.com) is another example for enriching legacy devices. This example is more into home automation. \textit{ShutterEaze} makes it easy for anyone to add remote control functionality and automate their existing interior plantation shutters. No shutters changing is required.
A slightly different example is \textit{Leeo} (leeo.com). As illustrated in Figure \ref{Figure:Legacy_Device}, \textit{Leeo} keeps track of smoke alarms, carbon monoxide alarms, and the climate in home. If something is not right, it sends notifications straight to the users phone. It is important to note that, there is no communication between the legacy smoke detection devices / alarms and the \textit{Leeo} device. They are completely two different systems without any dependencies. \textit{Leeo} get triggered by the sound that may produce by other traditional alarms. This is a very good examples to demonstrate how to embed smartness to our homes without replacing existing legacy systems. More importantly, any kind of replacing cost a significant amount to the consumers. This kind of solutions eliminates such unnecessary and extra costs that may put consumers away from adopting IoT solutions. The lesson we can learn is that if the legacy devices cannot understand the context it operates and act intelligently, the new devices can be incorporated to embed smartness to the overall system where new devices helps to mitigate the weaknesses in the legacy devices.
\begin{figure}[!h]
\centering
\includegraphics[scale=0.52]{./Images/16_8_Legacy_Device.pdf}
\caption{Enriching smartness to legacy devices: Legacy devices may monitor fire and smoke. Once these legacy devices detect any abnormalities, they will trigger their alarms and start to make sounds. \textit{Leeo} is designed to listen to such alarm sound. Once \textit{Leeo} detects such sound, it triggers its reaction mechanisms such as sending notification to the users, neighbours, and government authorities such as fire brigade in a predefined order. }
\label{Figure:Legacy_Device}
\end{figure}
\section{Concluding Remarks}
\label{sec:Conclusions}
In this survey, we reviewed significant number of IoT solutions in the industry marketplace from context-aware computing perspective. We briefly highlighted the evolution of context-aware technologies and how they have become increasingly popular and critical in today's applications. First, we reviewed number of IoT products in order to identify context-aware features they support. At the same time, we also categorized the IoT solutions in the market into five different segments: smart wearable, smart home, smart city, smart environment, and smart enterprise. Finally, we identified and discussed seven major lessons learned and opportunities for future research and development in context-aware computing domain. Our ultimate goal is to build a foundation that helps us to understand what has happened in the IoT marketplace in the past so we can plan for the future more efficiently and effectively.
\ifCLASSOPTIONcaptionsoff
\newpage
\fi
\section{Introduction}
\label{sec:Introduction}
Over the last few years the Internet of Things (IoT) \cite{P003} has gained significant attention from both industry and academia. Since the term was introduced in the late 1990s many solutions have been introduced to the IoT marketplace by different types of organization ranging from start-ups, academic institutions, government organizations and large enterprises \cite{ZMP007}. IoT's popularity is governed by both the value that it promises to create and market growth and predictions \cite{ZMP003}. The IoT allows '\textit{people and things to be connected Anytime, Anyplace, with Anything and Anyone, ideally using Any path/network and Any service}' \cite{P029}. Such technology will help to create '\textit{a better world for human beings}', where objects around us know what we like, what we want, and what we need and act accordingly without explicit instructions \cite{ZMP007}.
Context-aware communication and computing is a key technology that enables intelligent interactions such as those which the IoT paradigm envisions. Let us briefly introduce some of the terms in this domain which will help to better understand the remaining sections. Context can be defined \textit{as any information that can be used to characterize the situation of an entity. An entity is a person, place, piece of software, software service or object that is considered relevant to the interaction between a user and an application, including the user and application themselves} \cite{P104}. Context-awareness can be defined \textit{as the ability of a system to provide relevant information or services to users using context information where relevance depends on the user's task} \cite{P104}. Context-aware communication and computing has been researched extensively since the early 2000s and several surveys have been conducted in this field. The latest survey on context-aware computing focusing on the IoT was conducted by Perera et al. \cite{ZMP007}. Several other important surveys are analysed and listed in \cite{ZMP007}. However, all these surveys focus on academic research.
To the best of our knowledge, however, no survey has focused on industrial IoT solutions. All the above-mentioned surveys have reviewed the solutions proposed by the academic and research community and refer to scholarly publications produced by the respective researchers. In this paper, we review IoT solutions that have been proposed, designed, developed, and brought into the market by industrial organizations. These organizations range from start-ups and small and medium enterprises to large corporations. Because of their industrial and market-driven nature, most of the IoT solutions in the market are not published as academic work. Therefore, we collected information about the solutions from their respective websites, demo videos, technical specifications, and consumer reviews. Understanding how context-aware technologies are used in the IoT solutions in the industry's marketplace is vital for academics, researchers, and industrialists so they can identify trends, industry requirements, demands, and innovation opportunities.
The rest of the article is organized as follows. In Section \ref{sec:Classification}, we briefly analyse IoT marketplace trends and growth. The evolution of context-aware technologies and applications are presented in Section \ref{sec:Evolution}. Then, we introduce the theoretical foundation and our evaluation framework used in this paper in Section \ref{sec:Theory}. Subsequently, in Section \ref{sec:Review}, we review a selected number of IoT solutions from context-aware perspective. Later, we present lessons learned and innovation opportunities based on the evaluation results in Section \ref{sec:Lessons_Learned}. Finally, we present the conclusion remarks.
\section{Internet of Things Marketplace}
\label{sec:Classification}
The vision of the IoT has been heavily energised by statistics and predictions. In this section, we discuss some of the statistics and facts related to the IoT which allows us to understand how the IoT has grown over the years and how it is expected to grow in the future. Further, these statistics and facts highlight the future trends in the industry marketplace.
It is estimated that there about 1.5 billion Internet-enabled PCs and over 1 billion Internet-enabled mobile phones today. These two categories will be joined by Internet-enabled smart objects \cite{P041, TII07} in the future. By 2020, there will be 50 to 100 billion devices connected to the Internet, ranging from smartphones, PCs, and ATMs (Automated Teller Machine) to manufacturing equipment in factories and products in shipping containers \cite{ZMP008}. As depicted in Figure \ref{Figure:Statistics3}, the number of things connected to the Internet exceeded the number of people on Earth in 2008. According to CISCO, each individual on earth will have more than six devices connected to the Internet by 2020.
\begin{figure}[!h]
\centering
\includegraphics[scale=0.48]{./Images/1_4_Statistics.pdf}
\caption{Growth in Internet-Connected Devices / Objects by 2020.}
\label{Figure:Statistics3}
\end{figure}
According to BCC Research 2011 market report on sensors, the global market for sensors was around \$56.3 billion in 2010. In 2011, it was around \$62.8 billion. The global market for sensors is expected to increase to \$91.5 billion by 2016, at a compound annual growth rate of 7.8\%. One of the techniques for connecting everyday objects into networks is radio frequency identification — RFID technology \cite{Z1044}. In this technology, the data carried by the chip attached to an object is transmitted via wireless links. RFID has the capability to convert dump devices into comparatively smart objects. RFID systems can be used wherever automated labelling, identification, registration, storage, monitoring, or transport is required to increase efficiency and effectiveness. According to Frost \& Sullivan (2011), the global RFID market was valued at from \$3 billion to \$4 billion in 2009. The RFID market will grow by 20\% per year through 2016 and reach a volume of approximately from \$6.5 billion to almost \$9 billion. According to Figure \ref{Figure:Statistics2}, it is expected that five main sectors, education, transportation, industry, healthcare, and retails, will generate 76\% of the total RFID market demand by 2016.
\begin{figure}[!h]
\centering
\includegraphics[scale=0.48]{./Images/1_3_Statistics.pdf}
\caption{RFID Sales by Major Market Segments.}
\label{Figure:Statistics2}
\end{figure}
``Smart city'' \cite{P532} is a concept aimed at providing a set of new generation services and infrastructure with the help of information and communication technologies (ICT). Smart cities are expected to be composed of many different smart domains. Smart transportation, smart security and smart energy management are some of the most important components for building smart cities \cite{TII04}. However, in term of market, smart homes, smart grid, smart healthcare, and smart transportation solutions are expected to generate the majority of sales. According to MarketsandMarkets report on Smart Cities Market (2011 - 2016), the global smart city market is expected to cross \$1 trillion by 2016, growing at a CAGR of 14.2\% as illustrated in Figure \ref{Figure:Statistics1}.
\begin{figure}[!h]
\centering
\includegraphics[scale=0.48]{./Images/1_2_Statistics.pdf}
\caption{Smart Product Sales by Market in 2016.}
\label{Figure:Statistics1}
\end{figure}
The interconnection and communication between everyday objects, in the IoT paradigm, enables many applications in many domains. Asin and Gascon \cite{WaspMote} have listed 54 application domains under 12 categories: smart cities, smart environment, smart water, smart metering, security and emergencies, retail, logistics, industrial control, smart agriculture, smart animal farming, domestic and home automation, and eHealth. After analysing the industry marketplace and careful consideration, we classified the popular existing IoT solutions in the marketplace into five different categories: smart wearable, smart home, smart city, smart environment, smart enterprise. In this paper, we review over 100 different IoT solutions in total. It is important to note that not all the solutions we examined are listed in the technology review in Table \ref{Tbl:Evaluation_of_Previous_Research_Efforts}. For the review, we selected a wide range of IoT products which demonstrate different context-aware functionalities.
\section{Evolution of Context-aware Technology}
\label{sec:Evolution}
\begin{figure*}[!t]
\centering
\includegraphics[scale=0.65]{./Images/33-Evolution_of_Internet.pdf}
\vspace{-0.33cm}
\caption{Evolution of the Internet in five phases. The evolution of Internet begins with connecting two computers together and then moved towards creating World Wide Web by connecting large number of computers together. The mobile-Internet emerged by connecting mobile devices to the Internet. Then, peoples' identities joined the Internet via social networks. Finally, it is moving towards Internet of Things by connecting every day objects to the Internet}
\label{Figure:Evolution_of_Internet}
\vspace{-0.4cm}
\end{figure*}
It is important to understand the evolution of the Internet before discussing the evolution of context-aware technologies. The Internet broadly evolved in five phases as illustrated in Figure \ref{Figure:Evolution_of_Internet}. The evolution of Internet begins with connecting two computers together and then moved towards creating the World Wide Web by connecting large number of computers together. Mobile-Internet emerged when mobile devices were connected to the Internet. People's identities were added to the Internet via social networks \cite{NP001}. Finally, the Internet of Things emerged, comprised of everyday objects added to the Internet. During the course of these phases, the application of context-aware communication and computing changed significantly \cite{ZMP007}.
In the early phase of computer networking when computers were connected to each other in point-to-point fashion, context-aware functionalities were not widely used. Providing help to users based on the context (of the application currently open) was one of the fundamental context-aware interactions provided in early computer applications and operating systems. Another popular use of context is context-aware menus that help users to perform tasks tailored to each situation in a given application. When the Internet came into being, location information started to become critical context information. Location information (retrieved through IP addresses) were used by services offered over the Internet in order to provide location-aware customization to users. Once the mobile devices (phones and tablets) became a popular and integral part of everyday life, context information collected from sensors built-in to the devices (e.g. accelerometer, gravity, gyroscope, GPS, linear accelerometer, and rotation vector, orientation, geomagnetic field, and proximity, and light, pressure, humidity and temperature) were used to provide context-aware functionality. For example, built-in sensors are used to determine user activities, environmental monitoring, health and well-being, location and so on \cite{P217}.
Over the last few years social networking \cite{IA01} has become popular and widely used. Context information gathered through social networking services \cite{IA08} (e.g. \textit{Facebook}, \textit{Myspace}, \textit{Twitter}, and \textit{Foursquare}) has been fused with the other context information retrieved through mobile devices to build novel context-aware applications such as activity predictions, recommendations, and personal assistance \cite{NP002}. For example, a mobile application may offer context-aware functionalities by fusing location information retrieved from mobile phones and recent `likes' retrieved from social media sites to recommend nearby restaurants that a user might like. In the next phase, `things' were connected to the Internet by creating the IoT paradigm. An example of context-aware functionality provided in the IoT paradigm would be an Internet-connected refrigerator telling users what is inside it, what needs to be purchased or what kind of recipes can be prepared for dinner. When the user leaves the office, the application autonomously does the shopping and guides the user to a particular shopping market so s/he can collect the goods it has purchased. In order to perform such tasks, the application must fuse location data, user preferences, activity prediction, user schedules, information retrieved through the refrigerator (i.e. shopping list) and many more. In the light of the above examples, it is evident that the complexity of collecting, processing and fusing information has increased over time. The amount of information collected to aid decision-making has also increased significantly.
\section{Theoretical Foundation and Evaluation Framework}
\label{sec:Theory}
This section discusses context-aware theories and related historic developments over time. The evaluation framework which we used to review IoT products in the marketplace are built upon the theoretical foundation presented in this section. First, we lay the theoretical foundation and secondly we discuss the evaluation framework.
\subsection{Context-aware Computing Theories}
The term \textit{context} has been defined by many researchers. Dey et al. \cite{P143} have evaluated and highlighted the weaknesses of these definitions. Dey claimed that the definition provided by Schilit and Theimer \cite{P173} was based on examples and cannot be used to identify new context. Further, Dey claimed that definitions provided by Brown \cite{P175}, Franklin and Flachsbart \cite{P178}, Rodden et al. \cite{P181}, Hull et al. \cite{P179}, and Ward et al. \cite{P183} used synonyms to refer to context, such as `environment' and `situation'. Therefore, these definitions also cannot be used to identify new context. Abowd and Mynatt \cite{P115} have identified the five W's (Who, What, Where, When, Why) as the minimum information that is necessary to understand context. Schilit et al. \cite{P116} and Pascoe \cite{P180} have also defined the term context.
We accept the definition of context provided by Abowd et al. \cite{P104} to be used in this research work, because their definition can be used to identify context from data in general. We presented the definition of \textit{context} in Section \ref{sec:Introduction}.
\begin{figure}[!b]
\centering
\includegraphics[scale=0.74]{./Images/16_1_Theoratical_Summary.pdf}
\caption{Context-aware features identified by different researchers: Abowd et al. \cite{P104} (Blue), Schilit et al. \cite{P116} (Yellow), Pascoe \cite{P180} (Green). Ccontext-awareness as been defined using these features (can also be called characteristics of a given system) }
\label{Figure:Theoratical_Summary}
\end{figure}
The term \textit{context awareness}, also called \textit{sentient}, was first introduced by Schilit and Theimer \cite{P173} in 1994. Later, it was defined by Ryan et al. \cite{P182}. In both cases, the focus was on computer applications and systems. As stated by Abowd et al. \cite{P104}, those definitions are too specific and cannot be used to identify whether a given system is a context-aware system or not. We presented the definition provided by Abowd et al. \cite{P104} in Section \ref{sec:Introduction}. After analysing and comparing the two previous efforts conducted by Schilit et al. \cite{P116} and Pascoe \cite{P180}, Abowd et al. \cite{P104} identified three features that a context-aware application can support: presentation, execution, and tagging. Even though, the IoT vision was not known at the time these features are identified, they are highly applicable to the IoT paradigm as well. We elaborate these features from an IoT perspective.
\begin{itemize}
\item \textbf{Presentation:} Context can be used to decide what information and services need to be presented to the user. Let us consider a smart \cite{P007} environment scenario. When a user enters a supermarket and takes their smart phone out, what they want to see is their shopping list. Context-aware mobile applications need to connect to kitchen appliances such as a smart refrigerator \cite{P352} in the home to retrieve the shopping list and present it to the user. This provides the idea of presenting information based on context such as location, time, etc. By definition, IoT promises to provide any service anytime, anyplace, with anything and anyone, ideally using any path/network.
\item \textbf{Execution:} Automatic execution of services is also a critical feature in the IoT paradigm. Let us consider a smart home \cite{P007} environment. When a user starts driving home from their office, the IoT application employed in the house should switch on the air condition system and switch on the coffee machine to be ready to use by the time the user steps into their house. These actions need to be taken automatically based on the context. Machine-to-machine communication is a significant part of the IoT.
\item\textbf{Tagging:} In the IoT paradigm, there will be a large number of sensors attached to everyday objects. These objects will produce large volumes of sensor data that has to be collected, analysed, fused and interpreted \cite{P109}. Sensor data produced by a single sensor will not provide the necessary information that can be used to fully understand the situation \cite{IA06}. Therefore, sensor data collected through multiple sensors needs to be fused together \cite{IA05}. In order to accomplish the sensor data fusion task, context needs to be collected. Context needs to be tagged together with the sensor data to be processed and understood later. Context annotation plays a significant role in context-aware computing research. The \textit{tagging} operation also identified as \textit{annotation}.
\end{itemize}
\begin{figure*}[!t]
\centering
\includegraphics[scale=0.68]{./Images/16_2_Context_aware_Big_Picture.pdf}
\vspace{-0.33cm}
\caption{Data Flow in IoT Solutions in High-level. Context can be discovers in different stages / phases in the data flow. A typical IoT solution may use some part of the data flow architecture depending on the their intended functionalities.}
\label{Figure:Context_aware_Big_Picture}
\vspace{-0.4cm}
\end{figure*}
In Figure \ref{Figure:Theoratical_Summary}, we summarise three different context-aware features presented by researchers. It is clear that all these classification methods have similarities. We have considered all these feature sets when developing our evaluation framework.
\subsection{Evaluation Framework}
This section presents the evaluation framework we used to review the IoT products in context-aware perspective. We developed this evaluation framework based on the widely recognized and cited research done by Abowd et al. \cite{P104}. In this evaluation, we apply one and half decade old context aware theories into IoT era. Our evaluation is mainly based on three context-aware features in high-level: 1)\textit{ context-aware selection and presentation}, 2) \textit{context-aware execution}, and 3) \textit{context-aware-tagging}. However, we have also enriched the evaluation framework by identifying sub-features under above mentioned three features. Our evaluation framework consists of nine (9) features.
The Figure \ref{Figure:Context_aware_Big_Picture} visualizes how data is being collected transferred, processed, context discovered and annotated in typical IoT solutions. It is important to note that not all solutions may use the exact same data flow. Each solution may use part of the architecture in their solution. We will refer to this common data flow architecture during this paper to demonstrate how each solution may design their data flows. Our objective is to identify major strategies that are used by IoT products to offer context-aware functionalities. From here onwards, we explain the taxonomy, the evaluation framework, used to evaluate the IoT products. The results of the evaluation are presented in Table \ref{Tbl:Evaluation_of_Previous_Research_Efforts}. Summary of the evaluation framework is presented in Table \ref{Tbl:Summarized_taxonmy}.
First we introduce the name of the IoT solution in the column (1) in Table \ref{Tbl:Evaluation_of_Previous_Research_Efforts}. We also provide the web page link of the each product / solution. It is important to note that, these products does not have any related academic publication. Therefore, we believe that web page links are the most reliable reference to a given IoT solution. Such links allow readers to follow further reading by using the product name along with web link.
In column (2), we classify each product into five categories. Each category is denoted by a different colour: \iftrue red {\color{SC}\rule{0.2cm}{0.2cm}} (smart city), yellow
{\color{SN}\rule{0.2cm}{0.2cm}} (smart environment), blue {\color{SE}\rule{0.2cm}{0.2cm}} (smart enterprise), green {\color{SW}\rule{0.2cm}{0.2cm}} (smart wearable), and purple {\color{SH}\rule{0.2cm}{0.2cm}} (smart home). \else red \catC (smart city), yellow \catV (smart environment), blue \catN (smart enterprise), green \catW (smart wearable), and purple \catH (smart home). \fi Some solutions may belong to multiple categories. We divide the rest of the columns into three section : \textit{Context-aware Tagging}, \textit{Context Selection and Presentation}, and \textit{Context execution}.
\subsubsection{Context-aware Tagging Section}
\begin{figure}[!b]
\centering
\vspace{-0.43cm}
\includegraphics[scale=0.45]{./Images/16_4_Primary_Context.pdf}
\caption{\textit{SenseAware} (senseaware.com) uses small smart devices that comprises five different built-in sensors with limited computational and communication capabilities. It reports the status of the packages in real time to the cloud. These smart devices comes in different sizes and form factors, as illustrated here, in order to support different types of packaging methods (Two types of smart devices are shown in the figure)}
\label{Figure:Primary_Context}
\end{figure}
Context-aware tagging, which is also called context augmentation and annotation represent the idea of sensing the environment and collecting primary context information. We also believe that secondary context generation is also a part of context-aware tagging feature. Primary context is any information retrieved without using existing context and without performing any kind of sensor data fusion operations \cite{ZMP007}. For example, \textit{SenseAware} (senseaware.com) is a solution developed to support real-time shipment tracking. As illustrated in Figure \ref{Figure:Primary_Context}, \textit{SenseAware} collects and processes context information such as location, temperature, light, relative humidity and biometric pressure in order to enhance the visibility and transparency of the supply chain. \textit{SenseAware} uses both hardware and software components in their sensor-based logistic solution. such data collection allows different parties engage in supply chain to monitor the movement of goods in real-time and accurately know the quality of the transported goods and plan their processes effectively and efficiently. We list commonly acquired primary context information in column (3) in Table \ref{Tbl:Evaluation_of_Previous_Research_Efforts}.
\begin{figure}[!b]
\centering
\vspace{-0.43cm}
\includegraphics[scale=0.55]{./Images/16_9_Secondary_Context.pdf}
\caption{(a) User interface provided to the users, in this case parents by \textit{Mimo Smart Baby Monitor} (mimobaby.com). All the raw information collected are presented to the users, using graphs, figures and icons, after generating secondary context information. (b) Illustrates how primary context has been collected and transferred through the infrastructure to discover secondary context information.}
\label{Figure:Secondary_Context}
\end{figure}
Secondary context is any information that can be computed using primary context. The secondary context can be computed by using sensor data fusion operations or data retrieval operations such as web service calls (e.g. identify the distance between two sensors by applying sensor data fusion operations on two raw GPS sensor values). Further, retrieved context such as phone numbers, addresses, email addresses, birthdays, list of friends from a contact information provider based on a personal identity as the primary context can also be identified as secondary context. For example, \textit{Mimo} (mimobaby.com) has built a smart nursery system, where parents learn new insights about their baby through connected products like the \textit{Mimo Smart Baby Monitor}. In this product, \textit{turtle} is the device that collects all primary context information. Then the data is transferred to an intermediary devices called \textit{lilypad}. Such responsibility offloading strategy allows to reduce the \textit{turtle}'s weight at minimum level and to increase the battery life. the communication and processing capabilities are offloaded to the \textit{lilypad} device which can be easiy recharged when necessary. We can see \textit{Mimo Smart Baby Monitor} usees some parts of the data flow architecture we presented in Figure \ref{Tbl:Evaluation_of_Previous_Research_Efforts}. User interface provided by Mimo and the data flow within the solution is presented in Figure \ref{Figure:Secondary_Context}. Cloud services \cite{IA02} performs the additional processing and summarised data is pushed to the mobile devices for context presentation. In the user interface, parents are presented mostly the secondary context information such as baby movement or baby's sleeping status. Accelerometer sensors are used to discover such secondary context information using pattern recognition techniques. We list secondary context information generated by IoT solutions in column (4) in Table \ref{Tbl:Evaluation_of_Previous_Research_Efforts}.
\begin{figure}[!b]
\centering
\includegraphics[scale=0.50]{./Images/16_5_Context_Presentation.pdf}
\caption{The \textit{Fitbit} web based dashboard displays recent activity level and lots of other statistics using graphics, charts, and icons.}
\label{Figure:Context_Presentation}
\end{figure}
\subsubsection{Context Selection and Presentation Section}
There are number of commonly used strategies, by most of the IoT solutions in the marketplace, to present context to the users.
Most of the IoT products use some kind of visualization techniques to present context information the users. We call this \textit{visual presentation}. For example, \textit{Fitbit} (fitbit.com) is a device that can be worn on multiple body parts in order to tracks steps taken, stairs climbed, calories burned, and hours slept, distance travelled, quality of sleep. This device collects data and present it to the users through mobile devices and web interfaces. Figure \ref{Figure:Context_Presentation} illustrates the context presentation of \textit{Fitbit}. Variety of different charts, graphs, icons and other types of graphical elements are heavily used to summarise and present analysed meaningful actionable data to the users. such visualization strategies are commonly encouraged in human computer interaction domain specially due to the fact that \textit{'a picture is worth a thousand words'}. We denote the presence of virtual presentation related to each IoT product using (\checkmark) in column (5) in Table \ref{Tbl:Evaluation_of_Previous_Research_Efforts}.
IoT solutions in the market place also employ different commonly used devices to present the context to the users. Typically, an IoT solution offers context presentation and selection via some kind of software application. Some of the commonly used presentation channels are web-based (W), mobile-based (M), desktop-based (D), and objects-based (O). First, three mediums describes themselves. Object-based means that context selection and presentation is done through a custom IoT device itself. Sample IoT solutions that use object-base presentation strategy are presented in Figure \ref{Figure:Object_based}. We identify the presence of different presentation channels related to each IoT product in column (6) in Table \ref{Tbl:Evaluation_of_Previous_Research_Efforts}.
\begin{figure}[!h]
\centering
\includegraphics[scale=0.36]{./Images/16_10_Object_based.pdf}
\caption{(a) Smart Oven (maidoven.com), (b) Smart Fridge (lg.com/us/discover/smartthinq/refrigerator), (c) Smart Washing machine (lg.com/us/discover/smartthinq/laundry). Some of the commonly used objects in households are not enriched with presentation capabilities such as touch screens. In such circumstances context selection and presentation responsibilities can be offloaded to commonly used devices such as smart-phones and tablets.}
\label{Figure:Object_based}
\end{figure}
In addition to the context presentation channels, IoT solutions use number of user interaction mechanisms such as voice (V), gesture (G), touch (T). Over last few years, we have seen more and more voice activated IoT solutions are coming to the marketplace. For example, latest technological development such as natural language processing and semantic technologies have enabled the wide use of voice activated IoT solutions. \textit{Amazon Echo} (amazon.com/oc/echo), \textit{Ubi} (theubi.com) are two voice activated personnel assistant solutions. Typically, they are capable of answering user queries related to weather, maps, traffic and so on (i.e. commonly asked questions). They are designed to learn from user interactions and customize their services and predictive models based on the user behaviour and preferences. These solutions have gone beyond what typical smart phone assistants such as \textit{Google One}, \textit{Microsoft Cortana}, \textit{Apple Siri} has to offer. For example, \textit{Ubi} has the cabability to interact with other smart objects in the smart house environment.
More importantly products such as \textit{Ivee} (helloivee.com), a voice controlled hub for smart homes, facilitates interoperability over the other IoT products in the markets. This means that consumers can use \textit{Ivee} to control other IoT products \textit{Iris} (irissmarthome.com), \textit{Nest} (nest.com), \textit{Philips Hue} (meethue.com), \textit{SmartThings} (smartthings.com), and Belkin WeMo (belkin.com). We discuss interoperability matters in details in Section \ref{sec:Lessons_Learned}. In addition to centralizes home hubs based IoT systems, more and more standalone IoT products also support voice-activated interaction such as executing commands. For example, \textit{VOCCA} (voccalight.com) is a plug \& play voice activated light bulb adapter requires no WiFi, no set-up, no installation.
Gesture has also been used to enable the interactions between IoT products and users. For example \textit{Myo} (thalmic.com/en/myo/) is a wearable armband that can be used to issues gesture base commands. \textit{Myo} reads gestures and motion and let hte users to seamlessly control smart phones, presentations, and so on. \textit{Nod} (hellonod.com) is the a advanced gesture control ring. It allows users to engage objects with user movements. Nod can be considered as a universal controller, allowing effortless communication with all of the smart devices in users connected life, including phones, tablets, \textit{Google Glass}, watches, home appliances, TVs, computers and more. We identify the presence of different user interaction mechanisms related to each IoT product in column (7) in Table \ref{Tbl:Evaluation_of_Previous_Research_Efforts}.
IoT solutions process data in different locations in their data communication flow as shown in Figure \ref{Figure:Context_aware_Big_Picture}. Sometimes data is processed within the sensors or the local processing devices. In other circumstances, data is sent to the cloud for processing. Deepening the applications and functionalities each IoT solution tries to provide, data may be processed in real-time (RT) or later (A). Specially, event detection based IoT systems need to act in real-time which requires real-time processing. For example, IoT solutions such as \textit{Mimo} smart baby monitor performs data processing in real-time as their mission is to increase the health and safety of the toddlers. It is also important to note that not every solution requires data archival. For example, health and fitness related IoT products can be benefited from archiving historic data. Such archives data will allow to produce graphs and charts over time and provide more insights and recommendations t the consumers. More data also facilitates more accurate prediction. However. storing more data cost more and not every solution requires such storage. \textit{ShutterEaze} (shuttereaze.com) makes it easy for anyone to add remote control functionality and automate their existing interior plantation shutters. For example, IoT product like this will not necessarily be benefited by archiving historic data. Still it can learn user behaviour over time (based on how users use the product), and automate the task without storing data. We identify the usage of real-time and archival techniques in column (8) in Table \ref{Tbl:Evaluation_of_Previous_Research_Efforts}.
IoT solutions mainly use three different reaction mechanisms. Most commonly used mechanism is notification (N). This means that when a certain condition is met, IoT solution will release a notification to the users explaining the context. For example, \textit{Mimo} (mimobaby.com), the baby monitoring product we mentioned earlier, notifies the parents when the baby shows any abnormal movements or breathing patterns. Parent will receive the notification through their smart phone. Some IoT solutions may react by performing actuations (A). For example, \textit{Blossom} (myblossom.com) ia a smart watering products that can be self-programmed based on real-time weather data and gives the user control over the phone, lowering the water bill up to 30\%. In this kind of scenario, the product may autonomously perform the actuations (i.e. open and close sprinklers) based on the context information. Another reaction mechanism used by IoT solutions is providing recommendations (R). For example, \textit{MAID} (maidoven.com) has a personalization engine that continuously learns about the users. MAID learns what users cook regularly, tracks users activity using data from smart phones and smart watches. Then, it will provide recommendations for a healthy balanced diet. \textit{MAID} also recommends users to workout or to go for a run based on the calories they consume each day. We identify the usage of reaction mechanisms related to each IoT product in column (9) in Table \ref{Tbl:Evaluation_of_Previous_Research_Efforts}.
\begin{table*}[t]
\centering
\footnotesize
\caption{Summary of the Evaluation Framework Used in Table~\ref{Tbl:Evaluation_of_Previous_Research_Efforts}}
\vspace{-0.3cm}
\begin{tabular}{ c l m{13cm} }
\hline
& Taxonomy / Feature & Description \\ \hline \hline
1 & Product and Web link & The name of the IoT product or the solution sorted by `Category' and then by `Project Name' within each category in ascending order.\\
2 & Category & Category that the solution belongs to.
Each category is denoted by a different colour:
\iftrue
red {\color{SC}\rule{0.2cm}{0.2cm}} (smart city), yellow
{\color{SN}\rule{0.2cm}{0.2cm}} (smart environment), blue {\color{SE}\rule{0.2cm}{0.2cm}} (smart enterprise), green {\color{SW}\rule{0.2cm}{0.2cm}} (smart wearable), and purple {\color{SH}\rule{0.2cm}{0.2cm}} (smart home).
\else
red \catC (smart city), yellow \catV (smart environment), blue \catN (smart enterprise), green \catW (smart wearable), and purple \catH (smart home).
\fi
Some solutions belongs to multiple categories.\\
3 & Primary Context & Major context data captured by IoT solutions.
\\
4 & Secondary Context & Major secondary context generated by the IoT solution.
\\
5 & Visual Presentation & We denote the presence of visual context presentation using a (\checkmark). \\
6 & Presentation Channels & We identify a number of commonly used presentation channels as follows: Web-based (W), Mobile-based (M), Desktop-based (D), Object-based (O). Please note that web based channels can be accessed through both mobile and desktop devices. However, we consider web-based as a separate category while native mobile apps considered as mobile based and native desktop apps consider as desktop-based.\\
7 & User Interaction Mechanism & We identify Touch (T), Gesture (G), and Voice (V) as three commonly used user interaction mechanism. Interactions done through a PC or a smart phone is denoted by (M). Touch (T) refers to the \textit{`user touching a physical product'}. It does not refer to the user interaction using touch enabled devices such as smart phones.\\
8 & Real-Time or Archival & Some IoT solutions processes data in real-time (RT) and other process archival data (A). \\
9 & Reaction Mechanism & IoT products use different reaction mechanisms. Some of them release notifications (N). Some solutions provides recommendation (R) to the users on how to react to a certain situation. Some IoT products perform physical actuations (A).\\
10 & Learning Ability & Some solutions are capable of learning by analysing user behaviours and other inputs over time. such machine leaning ability is denoted by (ML). Other solutions require specific instruction from users typically using IF-ELSE-THEN mechanism. Such user defined approach is denoted using (UD). \\
11 & Notification Execution & In IoT products, notifications are released based in different conditions as follows: Temporal (T), Spatial (S), Event (E). Notification could be in any form such as SMS, email, sound, vibration and so on.\\
\\ \hline
\multicolumn{3}{c}{Note: Cases where sufficient information were not available are denoted by (-). Further, ($\times$) denote the unavailability of a certain feature.}
\end{tabular}
\label{Tbl:Summarized_taxonmy}
\end{table*}
Another important factor we identified during the product review is the learn-ability. Some products are capable of recording user provided inputs and other autonomously gathered information to predict future behaviours. In computer science, such behaviour is identified as machine learning (ML). For example, \textit{Nest} (nest.com) thermostat is capable of learning users' schedules and the temperatures users prefer. It keeps users comfortable and saves energy when they are away. In contrast, products such as \textit{Fibaro} (fibaro.com) requires users to explicitly defines (UD) event thresholds and triggers as shown in Figure \ref{Figure:Manual_Execution}. We review the learn-ability of each IoT product in column (10) in Table \ref{Tbl:Evaluation_of_Previous_Research_Efforts}.
\begin{figure}[!h]
\centering
\includegraphics[scale=0.65]{./Images/16_11_Manual_Execution.pdf}
\caption{Two scenarios defined using \textit{Fibaro} (fibaro.com) platforms. The screen-shots show how different types of context triggered can be defined by combining sensors, actuators and predefined parameters.}
\label{Figure:Manual_Execution}
\end{figure}
There are number of different ways that an IoT product would trigger a certain reaction. It is important to note that a single IoT solution may combine multiple triggers together in order to facilitate complex requirements. Some rigger may be spacial (S), temporal (T), or event based (E). Event based triggers are the most commonly used mechanism. For example, the IoT products such as \textit{SmartThings} (smartthings.com), \textit{Ninja Blocks} (ninjablocks.com), \textit{Fibaro} (fibaro.com), \textit{Twine} (supermechanical.com) allow users to define contextual triggers using sensors, actuators and parameters. Figure \ref{Figure:Manual_Execution} and Figure \ref{Figure:Event_Trigger} shows how two different products define events.
\begin{figure}[!b]
\centering
\includegraphics[scale=0.34]{./Images/16_12_Event_Trigger.pdf}
\caption{\textit{Twine} (supermechanical.com) provides a user interface to define scenarios by combining sensors and actuators in a WHEN-THEN fashion which is also similar to the IF-THEN mechanism. \textit{Twine} will trigger the actuation accordingly when conditions are met.}
\label{Figure:Event_Trigger}
\end{figure}
Low powered bluetooth beacons are commonly used in IoT products, specially in commercial and retail sector for both localization and location-based advertising \cite{IA002}. For example, \textit{XY} (xyfindit.com) and \textit{Estimote} (estimote.com) are two similar products in the IoT marketplace that provide small beacons that can be attached to any location or object. The beacons will broadcast tiny radio signals which smart phones can receive and interpret, unlocking micro-location and contextual awareness. Therefore, IoT products may trigger a reaction when either users entering into or going out from a certain area. There are some other products such as \textit{FiLIP} (myfilip.com) which users location-aware triggers to make sure children are staying within safe area. \textit{FiLIP} uses a unique blend of GPS, GSM, and WiFi to allow parents to locate their child using the most accurate location information, both indoors and outdoors. Parents can create a virtual radius around a location, such as home, school or a friend's house. Further, parents can set up to five such safe zones using the \textit{FiLIP} app. A notification will be sent to the parent's smart phone when \textit{FiLIP} detects that the child has entered or left a safe zone.
In temporal mechanism, trigger is release based on a time schedule. Temporal triggers may refer to time as time of the day (e.g. exactly: 10.30 am or approximately: morning), day of the week (e.g. Monday or weekend), week of the month (e.g. second week), month of the year (e.g January), season (e.g. winter). Figure \ref{Figure:Manual_Execution} show how \textit{Fibaro} system allows to define a trigger by incorporating temporal triggers. IoT products such as \textit{Nest} thermostat also use temporal triggers to efficiently learn and manager energy consumption.
\section{Review of IoT Solutions}
\label{sec:Review}
In this section we evaluated variety of different IoT solutions in the marketplace based on the evaluation framework presented in the earlier section. Table \ref{Tbl:Summarized_taxonmy}, summarises the evaluation framework used and Table \ref{Tbl:Evaluation_of_Previous_Research_Efforts} presents the IoT product review results.
\begin{table*}[t!]
\caption{Evaluation of Surveyed Research Prototypes, Systems, and Approaches}
\footnotesize
\renewcommand{\arraystretch}{0.8}
\begin{tabular}{
p{2.5cm}
c
m{2.8cm}
m{2.8cm}
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
}
\hline
\begin{minipage}[b]{2.0cm}[Project Type] Project Name (Web Link) \end{minipage} &
\begin{sideways}Category \end{sideways} &
\begin{minipage}[b]{2.0cm}Primary Context \end{minipage} &
\begin{minipage}[b]{2.2cm}Secondary Context \end{minipage} &
\begin{sideways}\begin{minipage}[b]{1.4cm}Visual \\Presentation\end{minipage} \end{sideways} &
\begin{sideways}\begin{minipage}[b]{1.4cm}Presentation Channel\end{minipage} \end{sideways} &
\begin{sideways}\begin{minipage}[b]{1.4cm}User \\Interaction\end{minipage} \end{sideways} &
\begin{sideways}\begin{minipage}[b]{1.4cm}Real-Time \\ Archival \end{minipage} \end{sideways} &
\begin{sideways}\begin{minipage}[b]{1.4cm}Notification \\ Mechanism \end{minipage} \end{sideways} & \begin{sideways}\begin{minipage}[b]{1.4cm}Learning Ability \end{minipage} \end{sideways} &
\begin{sideways}\begin{minipage}[b]{1.4cm}Notification Execution \end{minipage} \end{sideways}
\\
\hline \hline
(1) & (2) & (3) & (4) &(5) & (6) & (7) & (8) & (9) & (10) & (11) \\
[Waste Management] Enevo (enevo.com) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SC}{}} & Waste fill-level & Efficient routes to pick-up waste, schedules & \checkmark & W & M & RT, A & N, R & ML, UD & E \\
[Indoor Localization] Estimote (estimote.com) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SC}{}} & Bluetooth signal strength, Beacon ID & Location, Distance & \checkmark & M & M & RT & N, R & UD & T, S, E \\
[Parking Slot Management] ParkSight (streetline.com) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SC}{}} & Sound level, Road surface temperature & Route for free parking slot & \checkmark & M, W & M & RT, A & N, R & ML, UD & T, S, E \\
[Street Lighting] Tvilight (tvilight.com) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SC}{}} & Light, Presence, Local information such as weather changes, special events, emergency situations & Energy consumption, Energy usage patterns, Lamp failure detection & \checkmark & W & M & RT, A & N, A & ML, UD & T, S, E \\
[Crowed Movement Analysis] SceneTap (scenetap.com) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SC}{}} & GPS, Video & Crowd profiling at a given location & \checkmark & M, W, D & M & RT & N, A & ML & T, S \\
[Foot Traffic Monitoring] Scanalyticsinc (scanalyticsinc.com) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SC}{}} & Floor level & Heat maps to understand customer movements & \checkmark & W & T, M & RT, A & N & ML, UD & S, E \\
[Crowed Analysis] Livehoods (livehoods.org) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SC}{}} & \textit{Foursquare} check-ins cloud service & Social dynamics, structure, and character of cities on large scale & \checkmark & W & M & RT, A & - & ML & E \\
[Crowed Analysis] Placemeter (placemeter.com) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SC}{}} & Location, Video & Crowed movement & \checkmark & M & M & RT & - & ML & E \\
[Fire Safety] Fire Extinguishers (engaugeinc.net) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SE}{}} & Pressure gauge, Motion & Fire extinguisher usage patterns, Storage quality & \checkmark & W & M & RT, A & N & UD & S, E \\
[Foot Traffic Monitoring] Motionloft (motionloft.com) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SE}{}} & Video, Motion & Location, Movement direction, Predict pedestrian and vehicle traffic & \checkmark & W & M & RT, A & N & ML, UD & E \\
[Indoor Localization] Museum Analytics (artprocessors.net) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SE}{}} & Bluetooth signal strength, Beacon ID & Location, Distance & \checkmark & W & M & RT & N & UD & S, E \\
[Supply Chain Management] SenseAware (senseaware.com) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SE}{}} & GPS, Temperature, Humidity, Light, Pressure & Shipment quality & \checkmark & W & M & RT, A & N & UD & S, E \\
[Manufacturing Process Management] Sight Machine (sightmachine.com) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SE}{}} & Video, Mechanical movements of Robots & Quality and efficiency of manufacturing operations & \checkmark & W & M & RT, A & N & ML, UD & E \\
[Concrete Structure Health Monitoring] Smart Structures (smart-structures-inc.us) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SE}{}} & Accelerometers, Strain gages, Temperature & Real-time load capacity, construction quality & \checkmark & D & M & RT, A & N & UD & E \\
[Smart Pallet] (igps.net) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SE}{}} & RFID, Barcode & Identify item using Global Returnable Asset Identifier (GRAI) & - & W & M & RT & N & - & S, E \\
[Order Picking Glass] SmartPick (smartpick.be) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SE}{}} & Video, Barcode & Identify products, Identify the tasks to perform related to each object & \checkmark & O & T, G & RT & N, R & - & S, E \\
[Environmental Monitoring] AirCasting (aircasting.org) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SN}{}} & Sound levels, Temperature, Humidity, CO, NO$_{2}$ & Air quality maps & \checkmark & O, M, W & T, M & RT, A & N, R & UD, ML & E \\
\hline
\label{Tbl:Evaluation_of_Previous_Research_Efforts}
\end{tabular}
\end{table*}
\begin{table*}[t!]
\footnotesize
\renewcommand{\arraystretch}{0.8}
\begin{tabular}{
p{2.5cm}
c
m{2.8cm}
m{2.8cm}
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
}
\hline
\begin{minipage}[b]{2.0cm}[Project Type] Project Name (Web Link) \end{minipage} &
\begin{sideways}Category \end{sideways} &
\begin{minipage}[b]{2.0cm}Primary Context \end{minipage} &
\begin{minipage}[b]{2.2cm}Secondary Context \end{minipage} &
\begin{sideways}\begin{minipage}[b]{1.4cm}Visual \\Presentation\end{minipage} \end{sideways} &
\begin{sideways}\begin{minipage}[b]{1.4cm}Presentation Channel\end{minipage} \end{sideways} &
\begin{sideways}\begin{minipage}[b]{1.4cm}User \\Interaction\end{minipage} \end{sideways} &
\begin{sideways}\begin{minipage}[b]{1.4cm}Real-Time \\ Archival \end{minipage} \end{sideways} &
\begin{sideways}\begin{minipage}[b]{1.4cm}Notification \\ Mechanism \end{minipage} \end{sideways} & \begin{sideways}\begin{minipage}[b]{1.4cm}Learning Ability \end{minipage} \end{sideways} &
\begin{sideways}\begin{minipage}[b]{1.4cm}Notification Execution \end{minipage} \end{sideways}
\\
\hline \hline
(1) & (2) & (3) & (4) &(5) & (6) & (7) & (8) & (9) & (10) & (11) \\
[Air Quality Monitor] Air Quality Egg (airqualityegg.com) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SN}{}} & NO$_{2}$, CO, O$_{3}$, Volatile Organic Compounds, Radiation, Dust particulars & Air quality maps & \checkmark & W & M & RT, A & N & UD & E \\
[Public Sensor Infrastructure] Array of Things (arrayofthings.github.io) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SN}{}} & Temperature, Humidity, Light, CO ,NO$_{2}$, vibration, Volatile organic compounds, O$_{3}$, CO$_{2}$, SO, Dust particulars, Sound, infra-red images, Precipitation and wind measurements & Climate trends, Air quality & - & M & M & RT, A & - & - & E \\
[Smart Farming] Bumblebee project (niksargent.com/bumblebee) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SN}{}} & Video, Audio, Temperature, Sunlight, Weather & Model bees' life styles and behaviour & \checkmark & D & - & A & N & - & - \\
[Smart River Management] Floating Sensor Network (float.berkeley.edu) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SN}{}} & GPS, Temperature, Salinity & Maps of water movement, Hydrodynamic modelling. & \checkmark & W & M & RT, A & N & ML & E \\
[Floot Detection] Oxford Flood Network (oxfloodnet.co.uk) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SN}{}} & Temperature, Ultrasonic, Wet sensor & Flood detection and prediction & \checkmark & W & M & RT, A & N & ML, UD & E \\
[Weather Monitor] PressureNet (pressurenet.cumulonimbus.ca) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SN}{}} & Barometer, GPS & Weather Forecast & \checkmark & M & M & RT, A & N & ML, UD & E \\
[Waste Management] Smart Belly (bigbelly.com) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SN}{}} & Waste fill-level & Efficient routes to pick-up waste & \checkmark & M, W & M & RT, A & N, R & ML, UD & S, E \\
[Environment Monitor] Tzoa (mytzoa.com) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SN}{}} & Air Quality, UV, Temperature, Humidity, Light & Air Quality in streets, Indoor air quality maps & \checkmark & O, M & M & RT, A & N, R & UD & E \\
[Weather Monitor] (uniform.net) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SN}{}} & - & Retrieve weather information from Web a service & $ \times $ & O & T & RT, A & N, A & ML & E \\
[Sleep Monitor] Beddit (beddit.com) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SW}{}} & Force sensor, Heart rate sensor & Heart rate, Respiration, Sleep cycles, Sleep time & \checkmark & O, M & T, M & A & N, R & ML, UD & T, E \\
[Health Monitor] BioHarness (zephyranywhere.com) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SW}{}} & GPS, ECG, Heart rate & Breathing rate, Posture, Activity level, Peak Acceleration, Speed, Distance & \checkmark & O, M, W, D & T, M & RT, A & N, R & ML, UD & E \\
[Remote Health Monitor] BodyGuardian (preventice.com) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SW}{}} & ECG, Biometric Sensors & Health report & \checkmark & O, M, W & T, M & RT, A & N, R & ML, UD & T, E \\
[Smart Ring] Electricfoxy (electricfoxy.com) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SW}{}} & 3-Axis accelerometer, Heart rate, GPS & Heart condition, Calories Burned & \checkmark & O M & T, M & RT & N & ML, UD & T, S, E \\
[Health-Fitness Tracker] Fitbit (fitbit.com) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SW}{}} & 3-Axis accelerometer & Steps, Distance, Calories Burned, Floors Climbed, Sleep Tracking & \checkmark & O, M, W & T, M & RT, A & N, R & ML, UD & T, S, E \\
[Emergency Helmet] ICEdot (icedot.org) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SW}{}} & Users' medication, Users' personal allergies & Location & \checkmark & M & M & RT, A & N, A & UD & E \\
[Fitness Tracker] Lark (lark.com) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SW}{}} & Accelerometers, Gravity, Gyroscopes, Rotational vector, Orientation, Magnetometers & Activity recognition, Calories burned & \checkmark & M & M & RT, A & N, R & UD & T, E \\
[Sport Watch] Leikr (leikr.com) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SW}{}} & GPS, Heart Rate & Distance, Calories burned, Speed, Average pace per lap, Lap distance, Lap calories & \checkmark & O & T & RT, A & N, R & UD & T, S, E \\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\end{table*}
\begin{table*}[t!]
\footnotesize
\renewcommand{\arraystretch}{0.8}
\begin{tabular}{
p{2.5cm}
c
m{2.8cm}
m{2.8cm}
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
}
\hline
\begin{minipage}[b]{2.0cm}[Project Type] Project Name (Web Link) \end{minipage} &
\begin{sideways}Category \end{sideways} &
\begin{minipage}[b]{2.0cm}Primary Context \end{minipage} &
\begin{minipage}[b]{2.2cm}Secondary Context \end{minipage} &
\begin{sideways}\begin{minipage}[b]{1.4cm}Visual \\Presentation\end{minipage} \end{sideways} &
\begin{sideways}\begin{minipage}[b]{1.4cm}Presentation Channel\end{minipage} \end{sideways} &
\begin{sideways}\begin{minipage}[b]{1.4cm}User \\Interaction\end{minipage} \end{sideways} &
\begin{sideways}\begin{minipage}[b]{1.4cm}Real-Time \\ Archival \end{minipage} \end{sideways} &
\begin{sideways}\begin{minipage}[b]{1.4cm}Notification \\ Mechanism \end{minipage} \end{sideways} & \begin{sideways}\begin{minipage}[b]{1.4cm}Learning Ability \end{minipage} \end{sideways} &
\begin{sideways}\begin{minipage}[b]{1.4cm}Notification Execution \end{minipage} \end{sideways}
\\
\hline \hline
(1) & (2) & (3) & (4) &(5) & (6) & (7) & (8) & (9) & (10) & (11) \\
[Activity Tracker] Lumoback (lumobodytech.com) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SW}{}} & 3-Axis Accelerometer & Posture steps, Distance travelled, Activity recognition, Calories burned & \checkmark & O, M, D & T, M & RT, A & N, R & UD & T, E \\
[Baby Monitor] Mimo (mimobaby.com) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SW}{}} & 3-Axis Accelerometer, Audio, Respiration & Baby sleep status, Respiration patterns, Baby's body position & \checkmark & M, W & T, M & RT, A & N & UD & E \\
[Health Monitor] MyBasis (mybasis.com) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SW}{}} & Heart rate, Galvanic skin response, Skin temperature, 3-Axis Accelerometer & Activity, Health, Calories & \checkmark & O, M & T, M & RT, A & N, R & ML & E \\
[Medical Jacket] MyTJacket (mytjacket.com) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SW}{}} & Pressure & Activity level & \checkmark & M, W & T, M & RT, A & N, A & ML, UD & E \\
[Security Authenticator] Nymi (nymi.com) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SW}{}} & Heart activity & Personal Identity & \checkmark & O & T, M & - & N & - & E \\
[Sport Goggles] Oakley (oakley.com) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SW}{}} & GPS, 3-Axis Accelerometer
3-Axis Gyroscope, 3-Axis Magnetometer, Temperature, Barometric Pressure & Speed, Track friends, Navigation maps, Jump Analytic & \checkmark & O, M, W & T, M & RT, A & N, R, A & UD, ML & T, S, E \\
[Sports Helmet] TheShockBox (theshockbox.com) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SW}{}} & Accelerometer, Rotation, Pressure & Hit direction, Force estimation, Hit count & \checkmark & M, W & T, M & RT, A & N, R & UD & E \\
[Sport Assistant] Zepp (zepp.com) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SW}{}} & Dual accelerometers
3-Axis Gyroscope & 3D swing, Club speed, Swing plane, Tempo, Backswing position, Hip rotation & \checkmark & M & T, M & RT, A & N,R & ML,UD & E \\
[Indoor Air Quality Monitor] Alima (getalima.com) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SH}{}} & Volatile organic compounds, CO$_{2}$, CO, Temperature, Humidity, Accelerometer, & Indoor air quality prediction & \checkmark & O, M, W & M & RT, A & N & ML & E \\
[Smart Locator] BiKN (bikn.com) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SH}{}} & Beacon signal strength & Distance, Geo-fencing & \checkmark & O,M & T, M & RT, A & N & UD & S \\
[Family Connections] Good Night Lamp (goodnightlamp.com) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SH}{}} & $ \times $ & $ \times $ & $ \times $ & O & T & RT, A & A & $ \times $ & $ \times $ \\
[Light Bulb] Hue Bulb (meethue.com) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SH}{}} & $ \times $ & $ \times $ & \checkmark & M & M & $ \times $ & A & UD & $ \times $ \\
[Door Lock] Lockitron (lockitron.com) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SH}{}} & GPS, Person ID & Identify family and friends & \checkmark & O, M & M & - & A & - & T, S, E \\
[Smart Thermostat] Nest (nest.com) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SH}{}} & Temperature & Efficient heating schedule, Heat up and cool down time calculation & \checkmark & O, M & T, M & RT & A & ML & E \\
[Smart Home] Ninja Blocks (ninjablocks.com) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SH}{}} & Motion, Moisture, Temperature, Light, Humidity, Presence [extendible] & Energy usage, Indoor localization & \checkmark & M & V, M & RT & N, R, A & UD & T, S, E \\
[Weather Station] Netatmo (netatmo.com) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SH}{}} & Temperature, Humidity, Air quality, CO$_{2}$, Sound, Pressure & Weather prediction & \checkmark & M, W & M & RT & N & UD & E \\
[Smart Scale] Withings (withings.com) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SH}{}} & Weight, Body composition, Heart rate, Temperature, CO$_{2}$ & Body Mass Index, Air quality, Automatic user recognition & \checkmark & M, W & M & RT, A & N, R, A & UD & $ \times $ \\
[Smart Home] SmartThings (smartthings.com) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SH}{}} & Motion, Moisture, Temperature, Light, Humidity, Presence [extendible] & Energy usage, Indoor localization & \checkmark & M & V, M & RT & N, R, A & UD & T, S, E \\
[Thermostat] Tado (tado.com) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SH}{}} & Temperature, GPS, Weather forecast & Efficient heating schedule , User location prediction & \checkmark & M & M & RT, A & N, A & ML, UD & T, S \\
[Smart Cooking] Twine (supermechanical.com) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SH}{}} & Moisture, Magnetism, Temperature, Vibration, Orientation & Recommendation to cook meat & \checkmark & M, W & M & RT, A & N & UD & T, S, E \\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\end{table*}
\begin{table*}[t!]
\footnotesize
\renewcommand{\arraystretch}{0.8}
\begin{tabular}{
p{2.5cm}
c
m{2.8cm}
m{2.4cm}
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
}
\hline
\begin{minipage}[b]{2.0cm}[Project Type] Project Name (Web Link) \end{minipage} &
\begin{sideways}Category \end{sideways} &
\begin{minipage}[b]{2.0cm}Primary Context \end{minipage} &
\begin{minipage}[b]{2.2cm}Secondary Context \end{minipage} &
\begin{sideways}\begin{minipage}[b]{1.4cm}Visual \\Presentation\end{minipage} \end{sideways} &
\begin{sideways}\begin{minipage}[b]{1.4cm}Presentation Channel\end{minipage} \end{sideways} &
\begin{sideways}\begin{minipage}[b]{1.4cm}User \\Interaction\end{minipage} \end{sideways} &
\begin{sideways}\begin{minipage}[b]{1.4cm}Real-Time \\ Archival \end{minipage} \end{sideways} &
\begin{sideways}\begin{minipage}[b]{1.4cm}Notification \\ Mechanism \end{minipage} \end{sideways} & \begin{sideways}\begin{minipage}[b]{1.4cm}Learning Ability \end{minipage} \end{sideways} &
\begin{sideways}\begin{minipage}[b]{1.4cm}Notification Execution \end{minipage} \end{sideways}
\\
\hline \hline
(1) & (2) & (3) & (4) &(5) & (6) & (7) & (8) & (9) & (10) & (11) \\
[Personal Assistant] Ubi (theubi.com) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SH}{}} & Temperature, light, humidity, pressure & - & \checkmark & O, M, W & V & RT, A & N, R, A & ML, UD & T, S, E \\
[Power Plug] WeMo Switch (belkin.com) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SH}{}} & Temperature, energy consumption & Estimate Cost & \checkmark & M & T, M & RT, A & N, A & UD & T,E \\
[Family Connections] WhereDial (wheredial.com) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SH}{}} & GPS & location (e.g. pub, work, home) & $ \times $ & O & T & RT & N & $ \times $ & E \\
[Dog Activity Monitoring] Whistle (whistle.com) & \adjustbox{valign=m}{\colorbox{SH}{}} & Accelerometer, location, person & Daily Activity Report (play time, rest time), Medical Recommendations, Excers & \checkmark & M & M & RT, A & N, R & ML & S \\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\end{table*}
\section{Lessons Learned, Opportunities and Challenges}
\label{sec:Lessons_Learned}
This section presents some major lessons we learnt during the IoT product review.
\subsection{Trends and Opportunities}
According to our survey on the IoT product marketplace, it is evident that the types of primary context information collected through sensors are mostly limited. However, the ways such collected data is been processed varied significantly based on the application and the required functionalities that the IoT product plan to offer. Therefore, it is important to understand that, in IoT, same data can be used to derive different insights in different domain. In combine, the IoT solutions have used around 30-40 different types of sensors to measure different parameters. The ability to derive different insights using same set of data validates the importance of sensing as a service model \cite{ZMP008}, which envisions to create a data market that buys and sells data.
Most of the IoT solutions have used some kind of context presentation technique that summarizes and converts the data into a easily understandable format. It is also important to note that, despite the advances in human computer interaction, most of the IoT solutions have only employed traditional computer screen-based technique. Only few IoT solutions really allow voice or object-based direct communications. However, most of the wearable solutions use touch as a common interaction technique. We also see a trend of smart home products also increasingly use touch-based interactions. Hands free voice or gesture based user interaction will help consumers to seamlessly integrate IoT products into their lives. At least, smart watches and glasses may help to reduce the distraction that smart phones may create when interacting with IoT products.
Most of the IoT products ends their services after releasing notification to the consumers. Users will need to perform the appropriate actuation tasks manually. Lack of standards in machine to machine (M2M) communication seems to play a significant role in this matter. We will discuss this issue in Section \ref{sec:Interoperability}. Finally, it is important to note that increasing number of IoT products use data analytic and reasoning in order to embed more intelligence to their products. As a result, there is a need for domain independent, easy to use (e.g. drag and drop configuration without any program coding) analytical frameworks with different characteristics where some may effectively perform on the cloud and the others may work efficiently in resource constrained devices. One solution in this space is Microsoft Azure Machine. Learning\footnote{http://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/services/machine-learning/}. Another generic framework is \textit{Wit}. \textit{Wit} (Wit.ai) is a natural language processing API for the IoT which allows developers to easily and quickly add natural language processing functionality to their IoT solutions.
It is important to note that most of the IoT solutions consider families or group of people as a whole, not as individuals. Therefore, most of the IoT solutions are unable to individually and separately identify father, mother or child living in a given house. For example, the temperature that individual family members would like to have can be different. However, most of the modern thermostat only consider context information such as past behaviour, time of the day, presence of a user, and so on. However, it cannot handle individual preferences of the family members. Therefore, embedding such capabilities to the IoT products would be a critical requirement to be successful in future IoT marketplace.
In order to support and encourage the adoption of IoT solution among consumers, it is important to make sure that the usage of products allows to recover the cost of product purchase within a reasonable time period. For example, the \textit{Nest} thermostat promises that consumers can recover its costs through reducing the energy bill. Auto-Schedule feature in \textit{Nest} makes it easy to create an energy efficient schedule that help the users to save up to 20\% on heating and cooling bills.
\subsection{Product Prototyping}
There are number of do-it-yourself (DIY) prototyping platforms available that allows to create IoT prototypes quickly and easily. Specially these platforms are cheaper and modular in nature. They allow anyone with a new idea to test their initial thoughts with very limited budget, resources, and more importantly less time. \textit{Arduino} (arduino.cc) (including variations such as \textit{Libelium} (libelium.com)), \textit{.NET Gargeteer} (netmf.com/gadgeteer), \textit{LittleBits} (littlebits.cc) are some well known prototyping platforms. Most of these products are open source in nature. More importantly over the last few years, they have become more interoperable which allows product designers to combine different prototyping platforms together. The programming mechanisms use to program these modules can be varied (e.g. C, C++, C\#, Java, Javascript, etc.). Some platforms provide easy and intuitive ways to write program such as mashing-ups and wirings as shown in Figure \ref{Figure:Prototyping_Tools}.
\begin{figure}[!b]
\centering
\includegraphics[scale=0.57]{./Images/16_3_Prototyping_Tools.pdf}
\caption{(a) Microsoft Visual Studio IDE that allows to visually wire \textit{.NET Gadgeteer} hardware components. The IDE automatically generated the code skeletons to make the prototyping much easier and faster, (b) Hardware sensors and actuators of \textit{LittleBits} (littlebits.cc) platform, (c) Wyliodrin web-based IDE that allows to program variety of different platforms including \textit{Arduino} (arduino.cc) and \textit{Raspberry Pi} (www.raspberrypi.org) by visually drag and drop programming components, (d) a \textit{Raspberry Pi} (www.raspberrypi.org), (e) \textit{Intel Edison} board.}
\label{Figure:Prototyping_Tools}
\vspace{-0.4cm}
\end{figure}
There are small computer systems been developed to support IoT prototyping. For example \textit{Raspberry Pi} (www.raspberrypi.org) is a such product. \textit{Raspberry Pi} is a credit card-sized single-board computer developed in the UK by the \textit{Raspberry Pi} Foundation with the intention of promoting the teaching of basic computer science in schools. However, more recently, \textit{Raspberry Pi}s are heavily used in IoT product prototype development. For example, IoT products such as \textit{NinjaBlocks} (ninjablocks.com) has used \textit{Raspberry Pi}s in their production officially. Further, most of the platforms such as \textit{Ardunio} can successfully work with \textit{Raspberry Pi} Computers. Recently, Intel has also produced a small computer (e.g. Intel Galileo and Intel Edison boards) competitive to \textit{Raspberry Pi} which runs both windows and Linux. The Intel Edison is a tiny computer offered by \textit{Intel} as a development system for wearable devices.
Programming IDE tools such \textit{Microsoft Visual Studio} provides significant support for IoT program development by facilitating visual wiring, mash ups and automated code generation. Such ease of programming and prototyping abilities have attracted significant attention from hobbyist, researcher, and even from school children.
These modular based prototyping tools allow to build and test context-aware functionalities efficiently and effectively. Most of these platforms offer large number of sensing modules that allow to collect data from different types sensors. As we mentioned earlier such data can be considered as primary context. Therefore, such primary context can be combined together to generate secondary context information. However, in most of the prototyping platforms, secondary context discovery needs to be done manually or using IF-ELSE statements. However, it would be much useful to develop a standard framework with modularity in mind to address this issue. These modules need to be defined in a standard form despite their differences in real implementations. Further, such context discovery modules should be able to combine together to discover more advance context information \cite{IA001}. We further explain how such framework should work in real world in Section \ref{sec:Resources}.
\subsection{Interoperability on Product and Services}
\label{sec:Interoperability}
Interoperability is a critical factor to be successful in IoT domain. Consumers typically do not want to stick into one single manufacturer or service provider. They always go for their preferences and for the factor which are more important to them such as cost, look and feel, customer service, functionality and so on. Interoperability among different IoT products and solutions allows consumers to move from one product to another or combine multiple products and services to build their smart environments as they like in a customize fashion. Further, interoperability \cite{IA07} is also important to eliminate market domination of large companies that increase the entry barriers for the small IoT product and service providers.
In IoT market place, interoperability is mainly achieved using three methods: 1) partnerships among product and service developers, 2) open and close standards, and 3) adaptors and mediator services. We have seen that major industrial players in the IoT marketplace stablish strategic partnerships with each other in order to enable interoperability among their product and services. However, this is not a scalable strategy to widely enable interoperability among IoT devices. Similarly, large corporations such as Apple (e.g. \textit{HomeKit}\footnote{developer.apple.com/homekit}, \textit{HealthKit}\footnote{developer.apple.com/healthkit}) and \textit{Google} (e.g. Fit\footnote{developers.google.com/fit}) are also attempting to build their own standards and interoperability certifications. This kind of interoperability may lead to corporate domination of IoT marketplace which could also hinder the innovation by small, medium, and start-up companies.
\begin{figure}[!t]
\centering
\includegraphics[scale=0.48]{./Images/16_6_Interoperability.pdf}
\caption{(a) shows how a recipe is structured using conditional statements and actions. (b) shows how recipes are built combining different triggers, actions, and channels.}
\label{Figure:Interoperability}
\end{figure}
To address the interoperability, there are some alliance have been initiated. For example \textit{AllSeen Alliance} (allseenalliance.org) has been created to promote some kind of interoperability among IoT consumer brands. \textit{AllSeen} has developed a standard software platform called \textit{AllJoyn}. \textit{AllJoyn} is a system that allows devices to advertise and share their abilities with other devices around them. A simple example would be a motion sensor letting a light bulb know no one is in the room it is lighting. This is the ideal approach the interoperability among IoT products. However, security \cite{IA03} and privacy in this framework need to be strengthen to avoid using interoperability features to attack IoT products by hackers or evil parties.
Another approach to enable interoperability among different IoT solutions is through adapter services. For example, \textit{IFTTT} (ifttt.com), If This Then That, is a web based service that allows users to create powerful connections, chains of simple conditional statements. One simple statement is illustrated in Figure \ref{Figure:Interoperability}. Channels are the basic building blocks of \textit{IFTTT}. Each Channel has its own \textit{Triggers} and \textit{Actions}. Some example Channels could be \textit{Facebook}, \textit{Twitter}, weather,\textit{ Android Wear}, and so on. Channel could be both hardware or software. Service providers and product manufactures need to register their services with \textit{IFTTT} once. After that anyone interested ca use that product or service as a channel to compose any recipe. Example list of channels are listed here: ifttt.com/channels. Personal recipes are combinations of a \textit{Trigger} and an \textit{Action} from active Channels. Example recipes are shown in Figure \ref{Figure:Interoperability}. For example, first recipe is defined to send a twitter message to a family member when the user reaches home. This kind of recipe can be used to offload responsibility from a child so the system automatically act on behalf of the child and sent a tweet to their parents. Context-aware recommendation can also help users to quickly configure channels in \textit{IFTTT}. Context could be location, time, family members around, IoT products located near by and so on. Context-aware recommendation \cite{IA003} can also be done by analysing similar users with similar smart environments.
\subsection{Resources and Energy Management}
\label{sec:Resources}
Most popular approach of energy management in IoT is through smart plugs. \textit{Plugwise} (shop.plugwise.com), \textit{Thinkecoinc} (shop.thinkecoinc.com), \textit{Belkin} (www.belkin.com) provide similar functionalities and services where they capture energy consumption using smart plugs. These solutions analyse data in many different ways and presented the context information to the users using variety of different charts and graphs. These plugs can also be used to home automation as they can be switched ON and OFF remotely or conditionally. For example, a condition would be temporal (i.e. time-aware behaviour) or spatial (i.e. location-aware behaviour).
There aren't any IoT solutions that focus on planning or deployment stages of smart environments. Analyse energy consumption is important in both industrial large scale deployments (e.g. waste management solutions discussed in \cite{ZMP008}) and in consumer based smart home and office deployments. Lets consider a smart home office planing and deployment scenario. At the moment, IoT marketplace is flooded with large number of IoT smart products that offer different functionalities. However, there aren't any method for consumers to measure or compare the benefits these products may offer and the associated costs such as cost of purchase, installation and maintains. Further, it is very hard to understand which solutions can work together and complement each other and which work standalone.
It is also difficult to understand where to install certain smart products and how many products are required to cover a certain area. (e.g. what are the ideal locations to install micro-climate sensors within a building which enable to accurately identify the micro-climate behaviour). Another issue would be to determine the coverage of a product. For example, how many motion sensors are required for a given home or office. Currently, to best of our knowledge, there is no such tool that can be used to achieve above planning and installation tasks. As we mentioned before, consumers are always eager to know the costs and benefits of a products. Therefore, it is important to facilitate some tools that can demonstrate cost benefit analysis (e.g. purchase cost, maintenance cost such as energy, energy saving and so on.). Context information will play a significant role in this kind of tools where consumers may need to input the budget, size of the building, their priorities and expectations. The tool will need to make recommendations to the consumers on which product to buy based on the product's technical specification and other consumers' reviews and comments.
The planing and installation becomes much more critical in industrial settings. Let considers the agricultural sensing scenario, the \textit{Phenonet} project, presented in \cite{ZMC008}. \textit{Phenonet} describes the network of sensors collecting information over a field of experimental crops. Researchers at the \textit{High Resolution Plant Phenomics Centre} \cite{P585} needs to monitor plant growth and performance information under different climate conditions over time.
It would be very valuable to have a tool that can help planning large scale sensor deployments. For example, energy predictive models will help the users to decide what kind of energy sources to be used and what kind of battery size to be used in each scenario. The amount of sensor nodes require to cover a curtain geographical area should be able to accurately predicted based on the context information using such tool. For example, in the agricultural sensing scenario, sensors deployments are planned by agricultural scientist who have little knowledge on electronic, communication, or energy consumption. Therefore, it is useful to have a user friendly tool that enables them to plot and visualise a large scale sensor deployment in virtual setting before getting into real world deployments. Perera et al. \cite{ZMC008} have present the agriculture scenario in detail.
Context information plays a critical role in sensor configuration in large scale sensor deployments in IoT. The objective of collecting sensor data is to understand the environment better by fusing and reasoning them. In order to accomplish this task, sensor data needs to be collected in a timely and location-sensitive manner. Each sensor needs to be configured by considering context information. Let us consider a scenario related to smart agriculture to understand why context matters in sensor configuration. \textit{Severe frosts and heat events can have a devastating effect on crops. Flowering time is critical for cereal crops and a frost event could damage the flowering mechanism of the plant. However, the ideal sampling rate could vary depending on both the season of the year and the time of day. For example, a higher sampling rate is necessary during the winter and the night. In contrast, lower sampling would be sufficient during summer and daytime. On the other hand, some reasoning approaches may require multiple sensor data readings. For example, a frost event can be detected by fusing air temperature, soil temperature, and humidity data. However, if the air temperature sensor stops sensing due to a malfunction, there is no value in sensing humidity, because frost events cannot be detected without temperature. In such circumstances, configuring the humidity sensor to sleep is ideal until the temperature sensor is replaced and starts sensing again}. Such intelligent (re-)configuration can save energy by eliminating ineffectual sensing and network communication.
An ideal tool should be able to simulate different types of user scenarios virtually before the real world deployments begin. Once deployed, another set of tools are required to advice and recommend, scientists and non-technical users, on configuring sensor parameters. Configuring sensors in a optimal fashion would lead to longer operation time while maintaining required accuracy. It is important to develop the tools in a modular and standard fashion so the manufacturers of each IoT solution can add their products into a library of product which enables consumers to easily select (may be drag and drop and visualize) the product they prefer for visualization purposes. Further, such tools will need to be able to combine different compatible products together autonomously based on context information such as budget, user preferences, and location information so the users will be offered different combinations to select from.
Resource management is also a critical task that need to be done optimally in IoT domain. Previously, we discussed how data may transferred over the network as well as through different types of data processing devices in Figure \ref{Figure:Context_aware_Big_Picture}. It is hard to determine the optimal location\footnote{the device that is responsible for processing data} to process data. Therefore, it is ideal to have a tool that is capable of evaluating a given software component\footnote{A self contained algorithm that may take primary context information as inputs and outputs secondary context information using any kind of data reasoning technique \cite{ZMP007}.} against a given computational network architecture and deciding which location is optimal to conduct any kind of reasoning based on user preferences, resource availability, context information availability, network communication availability and so on.
\subsection{Privacy and Data Analytic}
IoT marketplace is mainly composed with three parties, namely: device manufacturers, IoT cloud services and platform providers, and third party application developers [15]. All these parities need to consider privacy as a serious requirement and a challenge. In this section, we present some advice on preserving user privacy in IoT domain.
\textit{Device Manufacturers:} Device manufactures must embed privacy preserving techniques into their devices. Specially, manufactures must implement secure storage, data deletion, and control access mechanisms at the firmware level. Manufactures must also inform consumers about the type of data that are collected by the devices. Moreover, they must also explain what kind of data processing will be employed and how and when data would be extracted out of the devices. Next, the manufactures must also provide the necessary control for the consumers to disable any hardware components. For example, in an IoT security solution, consumers may prefer to disable the outside CCTV cameras when inside the home. However, consumers will prefer to keep both inside and outside cameras active when they leave the premises. Moreover, devices manufactures may also need to provide programming interface for third party developers to acquire data from the devices.
\textit{IoT Cloud Services and Platform Providers:} It is likely that most of the IoT solutions will have a cloud based service that is responsible for proving advance data analysis support for the local software platforms. It is very critical that such cloud providers use common standards, so that the consumers have a choice to decide which provider to use. Users must be able to seamlessly delete and move data from one provider to another over time. Such a possibility can only be achieved by following a common set of interfaces and data formats. Most of the cloud services will also use local software and hardware gateways such as mobile phones that act as intermediary controllers. Such devices can be used to encrypt data locally to improved security and to process and filter data locally to reduce the amount of data send to the cloud. Such methods will reduce the possibility of user privacy violation that can occur during the data transmission.
\textit{Third Part Application Developers:} Application developers have the responsibility to certify their apps to ensure that they do not contain any malware. Moreover, it is the developers' responsibility to ensure that they present clear and accurate information to the users to acquire explicit user consent. Some critical information are: (1) the task that the app performs, (2) the required data to accomplish the tasks, (3) hardware and software sensors employed, (4) kind of aggregation and data analysis techniques that the app will employ, (5) kind of knowledge that the app will derive by data processing.
Users need to be presented with a list of features that the application provides, and the authorization that the user needs to give to activate each of those features. The control must be given to the user to decide which feature they want to activate. Moreover, in the IoT, acquiring user consent should be a continuous and ongoing process. Consequently, the application developers must continuously allow the users to withdraw, grant, or change their consent. Moreover, users must be given full access to the data collected by the IoT devices.
\subsection{Central Hubs}
Central hubs are commonly used in IoT solutions. A typical IoT solution may comprises a number of different components. For example, an IoT solution may have sensors, actuators, processing and communication devices. Due to the nature, sensors and actuators may need to deploy in certain location manner (e.g. door sensor must mount on the door). As a result such sensors and actuators need to be small in size. Due to miniature size, it is not possible to enrich them with significant computational capacity. Similarly, most of the time these sensors and actuators would be battery powers (i.e. without having connected to permanent power sources). Therefore, energy management within those sensors and actuators is very critical. As a result, such smaller devices cannot perform significant data processing tasks. On the other hand, these individual devices have only limited knowledge about a given context. For example, a door sensors may only know about the current status of the door. The knowledge that can be derived from such limited amount of data is very constrained. In order to comprehensively understand a given situation, context data from number of sensors and actuators need to be collected, processed, and analysed. To address this issue, most of the IoT solutions have been used a central hubs (sometimes called `home hub') or similar solutions as shown in Figure \ref{Figure:Home_Hubs}.
Typically, central hubs are larger in size compared to sensors and actuators. Further, they are capable of communicating using multiple wireless protocols such as WiFi, WiFi-direct, Bluetooth ZigBee, Z-wave, and so on. They are also capable of storing data for a significant time period. Typically, only one central hub is required for a large area (e.g. house). These hubs may perform data processing and reasoning tasks (e.g. triggering IF-THEN rules). Further these hubs are typically connected to the cloud services. Dispite the differences in , in high-level, all of these hubs allows to add functionalities over time (i.e. extend the functionalities they may offer), through installing new applications. An app could be a IF-ELSE procedure that explain a certain contextual behaviour as illustrated in Figure \ref{Figure:Event_Trigger}.
\begin{figure}[!h]
\centering
\includegraphics[scale=0.48]{./Images/16_7_Home_Hubs.pdf}
\caption{Centralised Hubs are category of devices heavily used in IoT solution. (a) \textit{Ninja sphere} (b) \textit{ALYT} Hub powered by \textit{Andorid} (c) \textit{Samsung}'s \textit{SmartThing} Hub (d) Sensors and other components are connected to a centralised hub. These hubs are typically connected to permanent power sources and comprises comparatively high computational capabilities.}
\label{Figure:Home_Hubs}
\end{figure}
The problem in this approach is that each IoT solution designers are eager to design their own centralized hub. Such design approach significantly reduces the interoperability among different products and services in the IoT marketplace. These hubs are tend to use custom firmware and software framework stacks. Unlike operating systems, they are mostly designed to run under specific hardware platforms and configurations. As a result, it makes harder for other IoT solutions to use or utilize other centralized hubs in the marketplace. Centralized hubs typically does not have any user interface. They are controlled and managed using smart phones, tablets, or computers.
In order to stimulate the adoption of IoT solution among consumers, it is important to design a common software platform using common set of standard. The current mobile app market is an ideal model for IoT domains as well where users may install different applications in order to enhance their existing IoT products. Verification is required to check whether the required hardware devices is available to support the intended software application. This is similar to the some mobile app stores validate the phone specification before pushing the each app to a smart phone. In comparison to mobile phone domain, IoT domain is slightly complex where hardware also play a significant role. A one possible solution is to use hardware adaptors. This means when a IoT product manufacture wants to design a product that is interoperable with a another hub in the IoT marketplace, they need to design a hardware adaptor that may handle the interoperability using two-way conversions.
Finally, it is also important to highlight the necessity of intermediation nodes that can perform multi-protocol communication, bridging short range protocols, and protocol conversions \cite{Z1041}. For example, sensors that may use Bluetooth and ZigBee which can only communicate very short distance. To accommodate such sensors, intermediary nodes may be required. The intermediate nodes may install throughout a given location which may use with log range protocols to communicate with the central hub. The intermediate nodes may use short rage protocols to communicate with sensors and actuators.
\subsection{Legacy Devices}
Most of the IoT products in the marketplace comes with own hardware components and software stacks. However, we have increasingly seen that IoT solutions attempt to enrich legacy devices with smart capabilities. One very popular solution is \textit{Nest} (nest.com) thermostat. It has the capability to learn from users over time about their behaviour and preferences and control the temperature more efficiently and pro-actively. This thermostat can be installed by replacing the existing non-smart traditional thermostats. Everything else connected to the heating systems would work seamlessly. \textit{ShutterEaze} (shuttereaze.com) is another example for enriching legacy devices. This example is more into home automation. \textit{ShutterEaze} makes it easy for anyone to add remote control functionality and automate their existing interior plantation shutters. No shutters changing is required.
A slightly different example is \textit{Leeo} (leeo.com). As illustrated in Figure \ref{Figure:Legacy_Device}, \textit{Leeo} keeps track of smoke alarms, carbon monoxide alarms, and the climate in home. If something is not right, it sends notifications straight to the users phone. It is important to note that, there is no communication between the legacy smoke detection devices / alarms and the \textit{Leeo} device. They are completely two different systems without any dependencies. \textit{Leeo} get triggered by the sound that may produce by other traditional alarms. This is a very good examples to demonstrate how to embed smartness to our homes without replacing existing legacy systems. More importantly, any kind of replacing cost a significant amount to the consumers. This kind of solutions eliminates such unnecessary and extra costs that may put consumers away from adopting IoT solutions. The lesson we can learn is that if the legacy devices cannot understand the context it operates and act intelligently, the new devices can be incorporated to embed smartness to the overall system where new devices helps to mitigate the weaknesses in the legacy devices.
\begin{figure}[!h]
\centering
\includegraphics[scale=0.52]{./Images/16_8_Legacy_Device.pdf}
\caption{Enriching smartness to legacy devices: Legacy devices may monitor fire and smoke. Once these legacy devices detect any abnormalities, they will trigger their alarms and start to make sounds. \textit{Leeo} is designed to listen to such alarm sound. Once \textit{Leeo} detects such sound, it triggers its reaction mechanisms such as sending notification to the users, neighbours, and government authorities such as fire brigade in a predefined order. }
\label{Figure:Legacy_Device}
\end{figure}
\section{Concluding Remarks}
\label{sec:Conclusions}
In this survey, we reviewed significant number of IoT solutions in the industry marketplace from context-aware computing perspective. We briefly highlighted the evolution of context-aware technologies and how they have become increasingly popular and critical in today's applications. First, we reviewed number of IoT products in order to identify context-aware features they support. At the same time, we also categorized the IoT solutions in the market into five different segments: smart wearable, smart home, smart city, smart environment, and smart enterprise. Finally, we identified and discussed seven major lessons learned and opportunities for future research and development in context-aware computing domain. Our ultimate goal is to build a foundation that helps us to understand what has happened in the IoT marketplace in the past so we can plan for the future more efficiently and effectively.
\ifCLASSOPTIONcaptionsoff
\newpage
\fi
|
\section{Introduction}
Electronic devices are often exposed to exceptional radiation levels, in many different fields of operation. Advances in technology during the last decades have both brought electronics to high radiation natural environment, and created situations in which high radiation levels are delivered to general population.
Space missions, artificial satellites orbiting around the Earth, high atmosphere experiments are examples of technological devices brought to natural high radiation environments. Nuclear power plants create artificial radiation environments, where technology is used and has to be able to operate to prevent catastrophic disasters.
Radiation therapy for cancer disease can expose human body to extremely intense ionizing radiation levels, based on the scientific knowledge that the benefits of treating an existing disease would be more than the risk to create new damages. Scientific research in High-Energy physics, using colliding particle beams, necessarily exposes radiation detectors and related electronics to ionizing and non-ionizing radiation, and asks for long-term operating capabilities in order to continue to take data for years without detector maintenance.
These examples explain how electronic devices are more and more required to be resistant to radiation damage effects.
The various types of damage which can occur due to exposure to photons, high energy charged and neutral particles, slow neutrons, have been categorized as follows:
\begin{itemize}
\item effects due to ionizing radiation: these are due to the accumulation of the resulting free charges which can modify the properties of materials, and thus change the behavior of electronic components.
Under this category, electronic devices are known to suffer from Total Ionizing Dose (TID) effects and Single Event Effects (SEE). TID is caused by the progressive accumulation of charges over prolonged exposure to ionizing radiation, and is also known as surface damage. It represents an important effect for insulators, electronic components, where surface charge can affect the behavior of transistors due to change in thin oxide layer properties, optical elements, whose light absorption spectra can be modified. SEE instead are due to single ionization events wherein a large concentrated ionization gives a temporary or permanent damage to electronically live devices or systems. It is an important effect for digital circuits such as memories or microprocessors, where it can induce errors, undesired latch$‐$ups and may lead to system failures.
\item Effects due to non-ionizing radiation: particles can displace atoms from their lattice sites and produce bulk damage effects called Displacement Damage Dose (DDD) effects, or also Non-Ionizing Energy Loss (NIEL) effects. These are cumulative effects due to long-term exposure to interactions with non$‐$ionizing energy transfers, which originate displacement defects in semiconductor materials. These are important effects in all semiconductor bulk$‐$based devices.
\end{itemize}
\section{Radiation damage in High Energy Physics experiments}
Detectors which collect data from particle collisions are exposed to increasing levels of radiation, depending on the signatures they are built to detect. Detectors looking for particle tracks close to the interaction region of the colliding beams are the most exposed to ionizing and non-ionizing radiation from secondary particles \cite{atlas,cmstdr,babar}, especially in hadronic colliders, and up to now the tracking detectors with the highest spatial resolution use silicon technology which is sensitive to both TID and DDD effects.
Ionizing energy loss generates charges that can get trapped in the oxide layers and interfaces of silicon strip detectors. This can affect the interstrip capacitance, increasing the detector noise levels, and also the breakdown voltage of the strips. On the other hand, DDD can create bulk damage to silicon crystalline structure increasing the leakage current, increasing the number of trapped charges, and changing the effecive doping concentration. This last effect can cause the so-called "type inversion", which changes the effective depth and growing direction of the depleted region of the silicon volume.
Typical levels of tolerance for silicon detectors are of the order of 10$^{13}$ hadrons/cm$^2$, with some improved hardness detectors tolerating up to 10$^{15}$ hardons/cm$^2$.
Detectors making use of gas mixtures are also sensitive to TID effects. The ionization of the gas molecules, combined with the high electric field, induces the formation of polymers which deposit around the anode wires and create a dielectric shielding where charges build up, reducing the electric field and consequently the gain and collection efficiency of the detector. Polymers can also accumulate on the cathode, causing the extraction of charges from it and increasing noise \cite{capeans}. The tolerated radiation levels differ dramatically for different detector layouts and gas mixtures, the micro pattern detectors being less sensitive to radiation due to their planar geometry and lower electric fields when used in cascade configuration. Orders of magnitude of 10$^{11}$ minimum ionizing particles per mm$^2$ can start causing ageing effects in gas detectors. Additional unwanted contamination of gas mixture can increase radiation effects, introducing molecular species that can be ionized and create unpredicted dielectric layers \cite{capeans}.
\begin{figure}[h!]
\includegraphics [width = 0.8 \textwidth] {cmsapd.eps}
\caption{Change in dark current for Hamamatsu APSs used in the electromagnetic calormeter of the CMS experiment, with respect to neutron fluence \cite{CMS}.}
\label{fig:apd}
\end{figure}
Scintillating crystal calorimeters are affected by TID and DDD in different ways. In inorganic scintillating crystals, ionizing radiation can create color centers which absorb scintillation light, reducing light yield. And in some cases also the scintillation centers could be damaged. Organic scintillators instead can also be damaged by DDD, especially by low energy neutrons which interact with hydrogen atoms modifying the molecular roto-vibrational levels and the related scintillation processes. TID of few Gray can already induce color centers in inorganic scintillators, depending on their structure \cite{zhu}.
Photodetectors can be affected by TID in their optical coupling components, with photomultiplier tube photocathode windows being darkened by color center formation and silicon photodetectors having their optical resin damaged by DDD. Silicon bulk of solid state photodetectors can also be damaged by DDD and SEE as already described for silicon detectors \cite{CMS}. TID of the order of kGy can damage glass windows while neutron fluences of 10$^{11}$ can induce effects in silicon and optical resins.
\section{Radiation damage in space environment}
Space environment is rich in different types of radiation with a wide energy spectrum. Solar wind and exceptional solar events, like storms or flares on its surface, continuously stream electrons and protons towards the Earth. Sources outside the solar system also generate radiation with different wavelength, and high energy particles up to 10$^{21}$ eV.
Most of the charged particles are trapped by the Earth magnetic field in the Van Allen belts and only few of them, the most energetic, reach the atmosphere where they interact generating air showers. Devices in space are thus exposed to different levels and kind of radiation depending on their orbit and their expected lifetime in space.
Radiation in space can be categorized as: predictable and unpredictable effects.
The average ionizing radiation present in the Van Allen belts can be accounted for as a predictable amount of TID and DDD. These doses should be taken into account while designing electronic devices to be used on earth orbits, or outer space missions. The unpredictable part of space radiation includes exceptional radiation sources from solar flares or storms, and can cause SEE which can disturbe or permanently damage the exposed devices. Damage can go from transient software upsets, to data corruption and permanent hardware upset. Electronic components can remain functional after a TID from tens of Gy up to tens of kGy, depending on the technological properties \cite{space}.
\begin{figure}[h!]
\includegraphics [width = 0.8 \textwidth] {RadiationBelts.eps}
\caption{Schematic view of charged particles trapped in the Van Allen belts by Earth magnetic field. The South Atlantic Anomaly is also visible.}
\label{fig:space}
\end{figure}
\section{Radiation damage in nuclear medicine}
The use of ionizing radiation in oncology has brought high radiation environments close to human body. Medical imaging with radiotracers exposes the patient to moderate levels of radiation depending on the radioisotope and the farmacokinetics of the binding molecule. A PET scan generally uses an activity of 18F-FDG equal to 10 mCi, which implies a dose delivery to the patient of 7 mSv \cite{ICRP}.
On the other hand the dose delivery to the PET scanning device would be lower due to the distance from the emission region located in the patient body, its screening effect and the lower exposure time. An average dose level to PET scanners has been estimated to be of the order of 0.05 mGy or less per single scan \cite{18f}. Therefore no damage to the active parts of the scanner is foreseen.
A different situation is present in radiotherapy treatments. Depending on the type of radiation, being gamma rays or protons or heavy ions, the area surrounding the target tissue could be interested by fringe radiation fields with an extension from few mm to few cm around the target. What can be damaged in these cases are implanted devices in the patient's body.
Implanted electronic devices include Cardiac Implanted Electronic Devices (CIED), Implanted Cardiac Defribillators (ICDs), Pace Makers, drug pumps, neurostimulators. These devices share the common trait to be often built with CMOS technology, which is sensitive to TID. After radiotherapy treatments these devices have reported to fail in different ways, for example ICDs experienced from simple malfunctioning, like changes in intervention thresholds, up to complete failure \cite{dutch}. During radiotherapy treatments such devices have a probability to receive a certain dose depending on the location of the device into the patient body (see fig.~\ref{fig:omino}). Three risk groups have been identified by the Dutch Society of Radiotherapy and Oncology for pacemakers and ICDs \cite{dutch}: a device exposed up to 2 Gy should only be checked for functionality after the treatment, exposure between 2 and 10 Gy needs the presence of a cardiologist and a crash cart during treatment, while over 10 Gy it should be discussed wether the radiotherapy or the cardiac disease are the main concern for the patient, and eventually relocate the device.
\begin{figure}[h!]
\includegraphics [width = 0.8 \textwidth] {omino.eps}
\caption{Ionizing dose foreseen for CIEDs, when the patient is treated with radiotherapy in different areas of the body \cite{dutch}}
\label{fig:omino}
\end{figure}
\section{Conclusions}
Detectors and electronic devices when used in radiation environment can undergo a number of different malfunctionings and ageing effects, depending on the technologies implemented in these devices. Thorough radation damage tests should be performed, simulating as much as possible the environmental radiation types and energies during real operation. This will allow the best technology to be chosen for the foreseen environment. Test facilities providing ionizing radiation (gamma, proton, ions), neutron research reactors and generators are available to meet these requirements for prototype irradiation. Test results should be integrated with Monte Carlo simulations of the radiation fields and beams together with experimental setups in order to better understand the effects on the exposed prototypes. A number of benefits would come from new radiation hard technologies, such as longer interplanetary missions with probes or manned missions, more reliable medical devices, and more detailed knowledge of the basic constituents of matter.
|
\section{Introduction}\label{sec:introduction}
Sequential data assimilation estimates the current unknown state $\xt \in \Re^{\Nstate \times 1}$ of a physical system as follows. The background (prior) state $\x^b \in \Re^{\Nstate \times 1}$ is given by a physical model initialized
with the best estimate of the state at a previous time:
\begin{eqnarray}
\label{eq:model-operator}
\x^b \equiv \x_{\rm current} = \M_{t_{\rm previous}\rightarrow t_{\rm current}} \lp \x_{\rm previous} \rp \,.
\end{eqnarray}
The background errors are assumed to be unbiased and normally distributed
\begin{eqnarray}
\label{eq:prior-estimate}
\errbac = \x^b - \xt \in \Nor \lp {\bf 0}_{\Nstate} ,\, \B\rp
\end{eqnarray}
where $\Nstate$ is the dimension of the model state, ${\bf 0}_{q}$ is the vector in the $q$-dimensional space whose components are all zeros, and $\B \in \Re^{\Nstate \times \Nstate}$ is the unknown background error covariance matrix.
Observations of the true state are taken
\begin{eqnarray}
\label{eq:observations}
\displaystyle
\y = \Ho \lp \xt \rp + \errobs \in \Re^{\Nobs \times 1} \,,
\end{eqnarray}
where $\Ho: \Re^{\Nstate \times 1} \rightarrow \Re^{\Nobs \times 1}$ is the observation operator, and $\Nobs$ is the number of observed components.
The observational errors are assumed to be normally distributed $\errobs \sim \Nor \lp {\bf 0}_{\Nobs},\, \R \rp$, where $\R \in \Re^{\Nobs \times \Nobs}$ is the observation error covariance matrix that is assumed to possess a simple structure (e.g., block diagonal) and therefore its inverse can be easily computed.
Under the Gaussian assumption on data and model errors the negative logarithms of the a posteriori probability density is the 3D-Var cost function \cite{DVAR3}:
\begin{eqnarray}
\label{eq:cost-function-3DVAR}
\displaystyle
\J \lp \x \rp = \frac{1}{2}\cdot \ln \x-\x^b \right \|_{\B^{-1}}^2 + \frac{1}{2} \cdot \ln \y-\Ho \lp \x \rp\right \|_{\R^{-1}}^{2}\,.
\end{eqnarray}
The maximum likelihood estimate of the state is obtained by minimizing the cost function \eqref{eq:cost-function-3DVAR}, i.e., the analysis state $\x^a \in \Re^{\Nstate \times 1}$ is the solution of the following optimization problem:
\begin{eqnarray}
\label{eq:solution-model-space}
\displaystyle
\x^a = \underset{\x}{\arg \min} \,\, \J \lp \x \rp \,.
\end{eqnarray}
The solution of \eqref{eq:solution-model-space} over the subspace spanned by the ensemble members is:
\begin{eqnarray}
\label{eq:analysis-state-general}
\x^a = \x^b+{\boldsymbol \Psi} \cdot \W_{\B} \,,
\end{eqnarray}
where ${\boldsymbol \Psi} = \B^{1/2}$ is a set of basis vectors satisfying ${\boldsymbol \Psi}\, {\boldsymbol \Psi}^T = \B$, and the vector of weights is given by
\begin{eqnarray}
\label{eq:optimal-weights-general}
\displaystyle
\W_{\B} = {\bf V}_{\B}^T \cdot \lp \R + {\bf V}_{\B} \cdot {\bf V}_{\B}^T \rp^{-1} \cdot \lp \y - \Ho (\x^b) \rp \,,
\end{eqnarray}
where ${\bf V}_{\B} = \H \cdot {\boldsymbol \Psi} \in \Re^{\Nobs \times \Nstate}$ and $\H = \Ho'$. By propagating in time the analysis \eqref{eq:analysis-state-general} a new prior (background) state is obtained for the next assimilation cycle.
Since $\B$ is unknown the direct use of \eqref{eq:analysis-state-general} is infeasible. Methods for estimating the background error covariance matrix have been developed \cite{Furrer2007227,Cheng2010}. However, in the absence of prior information about the true structure of $\B$ biased estimators are often obtained. Buhener \cite{Buhener2005} discusses the impact of having biased estimators for the background errors in the assimilation process. AIn the context of sequential data assimilation an ensemble of model realizations \cite{Evensen:2006:DAE:1206873} is built in order to represent the background error statistics:
\begin{eqnarray}
\label{eq:initial-ensemble}
\displaystyle \X^b = \lb \x^b_1,\, \x^b_2,\, \ldots \,, \x^b_{\Nens} \rb \in \Re^{\Nstate \times \Nens}\,,
\end{eqnarray}
where $\x^b_i \in \Re^{\Nstate \times 1}$ is the i-th ensemble member (model run) in the \textit{background stage}. Estimates of $\x^b$ and $\B$ are obtained via the empirical moments of the ensemble \eqref{eq:initial-ensemble}
\begin{eqnarray}
\label{eq:ensemble-mean}
\displaystyle
\x^b \approx \xm^b = \frac{1}{\Nens} \cdot \sum_{i=1}^{\Nens} \x^b_{i} \in \Re^{\Nstate \times 1} \,,
\end{eqnarray}
and
\begin{eqnarray}
\label{eq:ensemble-covariance-matrix}
\displaystyle
\B \approx \P^b = \S \cdot \S^T \in \Re^{\Nstate \times \Nstate} \,,
\end{eqnarray}
where the matrix of scaled member deviations is
\begin{eqnarray}
\label{eq:matrix-of-member-deviations}
\displaystyle
\S = \frac{1}{\sqrt{\Nens-1}} \cdot \lb \X^b - \xm^b \otimes {\bf 1}_{\Nens}^T \rb \in \Re^{\Nstate \times \Nens},
\end{eqnarray}
where ${\bf 1}_{q}$ is the vector in the $q$-th dimensional space whose components are all ones.
The set of basis vectors \eqref{eq:matrix-of-member-deviations} does not span the full space of model errors. By replacing the estimators \eqref{eq:ensemble-mean} and \eqref{eq:ensemble-covariance-matrix} in \eqref{eq:analysis-state-general}, the analysis can be approximated as follows:
\begin{eqnarray}
\label{eq:analysis-estimators-general}
\displaystyle
\x^a \approx \xm^a = \xm^b + \S \cdot \W \in \Re^{\Nstate \times 1} \,,
\end{eqnarray}
where
\begin{eqnarray}
\label{eq:optimal-weights-basis-approximation}
\displaystyle
\W = {\bf V} \cdot \lp \R + {\bf V} \cdot {{\bf V}}^T \rp^{-1} \cdot \lp \y - \Ho(\xm^b) \rp \in \Re^{\Nens \times 1} \,,
\end{eqnarray}
and ${\bf V} = \H \cdot \S \in \Re^{\Nobs \times \Nens}$. The analysis state \eqref{eq:analysis-estimators-general} is the optimal solution in the space spanned by the ensemble members \eqref{eq:initial-ensemble},
but in general it is not optimal in the model space. Since $\Nstate \gg \Nens$ information contained in \eqref{eq:optimal-weights-general} is not represented by the set of basis vectors $\S$. From another point of view, the ensemble covariance matrix $\P^b$ is rank deficient and therefore there are insufficient degrees of freedom to explain the full error. This problem can be alleviate by making use of localization techniques \cite{JGRD:JGRD50654,citeulike:6937506,TELA:TELA460}. However, since the structure of $\B$ remains unknown, the use of localization generally increases the bias in the background error estimation.
There is an opportunity to avoid the intrinsic need of inflation in ensemble based methods by replacing the covariance matrix \eqref{eq:ensemble-covariance-matrix} with a more accurate and well-conditioned estimate of $\B$. We do not want to impose any kind of structure on $\B$ since it will make our approach sensitive to problems faced by current implementations. Instead, we seek to capture most of the information contained in the ensemble. Shrinkage covariance estimators developed to estimate high-dimensional covariance matrices from a small number of samples \cite{Ledoit2004365} fit very well in the context of sequential data assimilation.
The remaining part of the paper is organized as follows. Section \ref{sec:preliminaries} reviews ensemble based data assimilation and shrinkage covariance estimation. In section \ref{sec:proposed-implementation} the two novel implementations of the ensemble Kalman filter based on shrinkage covariance estimation are proposed. Experimental results making use of a quasi-geostrophic model are given in section \ref{sec:experimental-results}. Section \ref{sec:conclusions} summarizes the conclusions of this work.
\section{Background}
\label{sec:preliminaries}
In this section we review relevant concepts with regard to shrinkage covariance estimation and ensemble based methods in sequential data assimilation.
\subsection{Covariance estimation}
\label{subsec:covariance-estimation}
Many problems in science and engineering require an estimate of a covariance matrix and/or its inverse, where the matrix dimension $\Nstate$ is large compared to the sample size $\Nens$. Different applications ranging from variational \cite{citeulike:6937506,citeulike:975315} to sequential \cite{JGRD:JGRD50654,citeulike:5092716} data assimilation rely on accurately estimated covariance matrices.
Let $\{s_1, \, s_2, \, \ldots, \, s_{\Nens}\}$ be a sample of independent identical distributed $\Nstate$-dimensional Gaussian vectors
\begin{eqnarray*}
\displaystyle
s_i \sim \Nor( {\bf 0}_{\Nstate} ,\, \Q) \in \Re^{\Nstate \times 1}.
\end{eqnarray*}
A common approach is to estimate $\Q \in \Re^{\Nstate \times \Nstate}$ by the sample covariance matrix $\C_s$
\begin{eqnarray}
\label{eq:empirical-moments-sample-covariance}
\C_s &=& \frac{1}{\Nens-1} \cdot \sum_{i=1}^{\Nens} s_i \otimes s_i^T \in \Re^{\Nstate \times \Nstate} \,.
\end{eqnarray}
$\C_s$ is the maximum likelihood estimator when it is invertible \cite{Ledoit2004365}. However, under the condition $\Nstate \gg \Nens$, this is not the case. The simpler thing to do in order to deal with the rank-deficiency of $\C_s$ is to impose some structure (i.e., localization in ensemble based methods). However, in the absence of prior information about the true structure of $\Q$, $\C_s$ will poorly describe the correlations between different components of the samples $\{s_i\}_{1 \le i \le \Nens}$.
In order to improve estimation of covariance matrices many methods have been proposed in the literature based on tapering procedures \cite{cai2010,Xia6252067}, minimizing the log-determinant divergence \cite{ravikumar2011}, and greedy methods \cite{GreedyEstimation12}. Another class of well-conditioned estimators is based on shrinkage approximations \cite{Farebrother1978,DeMiguel20133018,Couillet201499,Park20141,Bickel2014204,Fisher20111909}. These approximations express the estimated covariance matrix as a weighted average of some target matrix ${\bf T} \in \Re^{\Nstate \times \Nstate}$ and the empirical covariance matrix \eqref{eq:empirical-moments-sample-covariance}. To better understand this assume that the components of $s_i$ are uncorrelated for $1 \le i \le \Nens$. A simple estimate of $\Q$ is given by
\begin{eqnarray*}
{\bf T} = \frac{{\rm tr} \lp \C_s \rp}{\Nstate} \cdot \I_{\Nstate \times \Nstate} \,,
\end{eqnarray*}
where $\I_{\Nstate \times \Nstate}$ is the identity matrix in the $\Nstate$-dimensional space. Note that this structure will reduce the variance but will increase the bias when the diagonal assumption is not fulfilled. A reasonable trade-off is achieved by the shrinkage of $\C_s$ towards ${\bf T}$ and provides the followng class of estimators
\begin{eqnarray}
\label{eq:shinkrage-estimator}
\displaystyle
{\bf \widehat{C}} = \gamma \cdot {\bf T} + \lp 1 - \gamma \rp \cdot \C_s \in \Re^{\Nstate \times \Nstate}\,,
\end{eqnarray}
where $\gamma \in [0,\,1]$. The problem is then reduced to find an optimal value for $\gamma$ in which the squared loss
\begin{eqnarray}
\label{eq:squared-loss}
\displaystyle
\expect \lb \ln {\bf \widehat{C}} - \Q \right \|_{F}^2 \rb
\end{eqnarray}
is minimized, where $\ln \bullet \right \|_{F}$ denotes the Frobenius norm. There are many shrinkage based estimators derived from the minimization of \eqref{eq:squared-loss} subject to \eqref{eq:shinkrage-estimator}. We restrict our exploration to three well-accepted methods: the Ledoit and Wolf estimator \cite{Ledoit2004365}, the Rao-Blackwell Ledoit and Wolf estimator \cite{Yilun5484583} and the oracle approximating shrinkage estimator \cite{Yilun5484583,Yilun5743027}.
The distribution-free Ledoit and Wolf (LW) estimator \cite{Ledoit2004365} has been proven more accurate than the sample covariance matrix and some estimators proposed in finite sample decision theory. Moreover, it is better conditioned than the true covariance matrix \cite{Ledoit2004365}. The optimal $\gamma$ value proposed by this estimator is
\begin{eqnarray}
\label{eq:LW-estimator}
\displaystyle
\gamma_{LW} = \min \lp \frac{\sum_{i=1}^{\Nens} \ln \C_s - s_i \otimes s_i^T \right \|_{F}^2}{\Nens^2 \cdot \lb {\rm tr} \lp \C_s^2 \rp - \frac{{\rm tr}^2 \lp \C_s \rp}{\Nstate} \rb} ,\, 1\rp
\end{eqnarray}
and the LW estimator ${\bf \widehat{C}}_{LW}$ is obtained by using $\gamma_{LW}$ in \eqref{eq:shinkrage-estimator}.
The Rao-Blackwell Ledoit and Wolf (RBLW) estimator \cite{Yilun5743027,Yilun5484583} provably improves the LW method under Gaussian assumptions. The motivation of this estimator is that, under Gaussian assumptions, all the information required in order to get a well-conditioned estimate of $\Q$ is contained in $\C_s$. The proposed value for $\gamma$ is
\begin{eqnarray}
\label{eq:RBLW-estimator}
\displaystyle
\gamma_{RBLW} = \min \lp \frac{\frac{\Nens-2}{\Nstate} \cdot {\rm tr}\lp \C_s^2\rp + {\rm tr}^2\lp \C_s \rp }{(\Nens+2) \cdot \lb {\rm tr}\lp \C_s^2\rp - \frac{{\rm tr}^2 \lp \C_s\rp}{\Nstate}\rb},\, 1\rp
\end{eqnarray}
and the corresponding estimator ${\bf \widehat{C}}_{RBLW}$ is obtained by replacing \eqref{eq:RBLW-estimator} in the equation \eqref{eq:shinkrage-estimator}. In addition, in \cite[Theorem 2]{Yilun5743027}, it is proven that
\begin{eqnarray*}
\displaystyle \expect \lb \ln {\bf \widehat{C}}_{RBLW} - \Q \right \|_{F}^2 \rb \le \expect \lb \ln {\bf \widehat{C}}_{LW} - \Q \right \|_{F}^2 \rb \,,
\end{eqnarray*}
which rigorously shows the RBLW estimator to be a better approximation of $\Q$ than the LW estimator under the Gaussian assumption.
The oracle approximating shrinkage (OAS) estimator \cite{Yilun5484583} is an iterative approximation of the unimplementable oracle method \cite[Section 3]{Yilun5484583}. The optimal $\gamma$ at each iteration $j$ is given by
\begin{subequations}
\begin{eqnarray}
\displaystyle
\label{eq:OAS-estimator-matrix-j}
{\bf \widehat{C}}_j &=& \gamma_j \cdot {\bf T} + (1-\gamma_j) \cdot \C_s \,,\\
\label{eq:OAS-estimator-gamma-value}
\gamma_{j+1} &=& \frac{\lp 1-\frac{2}{\Nstate}\rp \cdot {\rm tr}\lp {\bf \widehat{C}}_j \cdot \C_s \rp + {\rm tr}^2 \lp {\bf \widehat{C}}_j \rp}{\lp \Nens+1-\frac{2}{\Nstate} \rp \cdot {\rm tr} \lp {\bf \widehat{C}}_j \cdot \C_s \rp + \lp 1-\frac{\Nens}{\Nstate} \rp \cdot {\rm tr}^2 \lp {\bf \widehat{C}}_j \rp}
\end{eqnarray}
\end{subequations}
where the initial estimator ${\bf \widehat{C}}_0$ can be any estimator (i.e., the LW, the RBLW, or even the sample covariance matrix).
All the estimators presented in this section provide well-conditioned approximations to the unknown covariance matrix $\Q$. We center our attention on the RBLW estimator since in high dimensional problems, such those found in data assimilation, this estimator can be implemented easily, and under the Gaussian assumption it provides better approximations than the LW estimator.
\subsection{Sequential data assimilation methods}
\label{subsec:data-assimilation-methods}
Ensemble data assimilation methods are widely used in applications to weather, oceanography, and climatology \cite{DAIssues}. These methods represent the background error statistics by the empirical moments of the ensemble \eqref{eq:ensemble-mean} and \eqref{eq:ensemble-covariance-matrix}\cite{EnKF1657419}. The trajectory of each ensemble member and the dispersion of the overall ensemble around the background state provide meaningful information about the background error distribution. One of the most important advantages of ensemble DA is the flow-dependent forecast error covariance matrix \cite{Buhener2005}. When observations are available the analysis state \eqref{eq:analysis-estimators-general} is computed. The next step is to generate an ensemble which describes the analysis uncertainty around this optimal state. We briefly discuss three implementations that achieve this, the ensemble square root filter, the ensemble transform Kalman filter, and the (basic) ensemble Kalman filter.
In ensemble square root filters \cite{Tippett2003}, the new analysis ensemble in the analysis is built as follows:
\begin{eqnarray}
\label{eq:ensrf-analysis}
\displaystyle
\X^a = \xm^a \otimes {\bf 1}_{\Nens}^T + \S \cdot \lb \I_{\Nens \times \Nens} - {{\bf V}}^T \cdot \lp \R + {\bf V} \cdot {\bf V}^T \rp^{-1} \cdot {\bf V} \rb^{1/2} \in \Re^{\Nstate \times \Nens} \,.
\end{eqnarray}
As expected the analysis ensemble members live in the subspace space spanned by the background ensemble, this is, the space spanned by the columns of $\S$. All possible information that can be obtained from the model states is contained in this set of basis vectors.
The covariance matrix in the observation space is
\begin{eqnarray}
\label{eq:weighted-covariance-matrix}
{\bf W}_{\rm obs} = \R+{\bf V} \cdot {\bf V}^T \in \Re^{\Nobs \times \Nobs} \,,
\end{eqnarray}
the linear system ${\bf W}_{\rm obs} \cdot \Z_{\bf V} = {\bf V} \in \Re^{\Nobs \times \Nens}$ can be solved via the iterative Sherman Morrison formula (ISMF) \cite{Nino2014}
\begin{subequations}
\label{eq:ISMF}
\begin{eqnarray}
\displaystyle
\label{eq:ISMF-stage-1}
{\bf h}^{(k)} &=& \lp 1+ {\bf v}_k^T \cdot {\bf u}_{k}^{(k-1)}\rp^{-1} \cdot {\bf u}_{k}^{(k-1)} \in \Re^{\Nobs \times 1} \\
\label{eq:ISMF-stage-2}
\Z^{(k)} &=& \Z^{(k-1)} - {\bf h}^{(k)} \cdot \lb {\bf v}_k^T \cdot \Z^{(k-1)} \rb \in \Re^{\Nobs \times \Nens} \\
\label{eq:ISMF-stage-3}
{\bf U}^{(k)} &=& {\bf U}^{(k-1)} - {\bf h}^{(k)} \cdot \lb {\bf v}_k^T \cdot {\bf U}^{(k-1)} \rb \in \Re^{\Nobs \times \Nens}
\end{eqnarray}
\end{subequations}
for $1 \le k \le \Nens$, where $\Z^{(0)} = \R^{-1} \cdot \lp \y - \H \cdot \xm^b \rp$ and ${\bf U}^{(0)} = \R^{-1} \cdot {\bf V}$.
The implementation \eqref{eq:ISMF} requires no more than $\BO{\Nens^2 \cdot \Nobs}$ long computations, where ${\bf v}_k$ and ${\bf u}_k^{(k-1)}$ are the $k$-th column of the matrices ${\bf V}$ and ${\bf U}^{(k-1)}_k$, respectively. Moreover, by applying the singular value decomposition to
\begin{eqnarray}
\label{eq:square-root-filter}
\displaystyle
{\bf V}^T \cdot \Z_{{\bf V}} = {\bf U}_{\Z} \cdot {\boldsymbol \Sigma}_{\Z} \cdot {\bf U}_{\Z}^T \in \Re^{\Nens \times \Nens} \in \Re^{\Nens \times \Nens}\,,
\end{eqnarray}
the square root in \eqref{eq:ensrf-analysis}
\begin{eqnarray*}
{\boldsymbol{\Gamma}} = {\bf U}_{\Z} \cdot \lb \I_{\Nens \times \Nens} - {\boldsymbol \Sigma}_{\Z}\rb^{1/2} \cdot {\bf U}_{\Z}^T \,,
\end{eqnarray*}
can be efficiently computed with no more than $\BO{\Nens^3}$ long computations.
Another widely used square root filter implementation is the ensemble transform Kalman filter (EnTKF) \cite{Nuru2013}. By making use of the matrix identity
\begin{eqnarray}
\label{eq:EnTKF-matrix-identity}
\displaystyle \I - {\bf V} \cdot \lb \R + {\bf V} \cdot {\bf V}^T \rb^{-1} \cdot {\bf V}^T = \lb \I+{\bf V} \cdot \R \cdot {\bf V}^T \rb^{-1} \in \Re^{\Nobs \times \Nobs} \,,
\end{eqnarray}
and the singular value decomposition
\begin{eqnarray}
\label{eq:entkf-svd}
\displaystyle
{\bf V}^T = {\bf U}_{{\bf V}} \cdot \widehat{\boldsymbol \Sigma}_{{\bf V}} \cdot {\bf V}_{{\bf V}}^T \in \Re^{\Nens \times \Nobs} \,,
\end{eqnarray}
the analysis state \eqref{eq:analysis-estimators-general} can be written as follows
\begin{eqnarray}
\label{eq:entkf-analysis}
\displaystyle
\x^a = \xm^b + \S \cdot {\boldsymbol \beta}
\end{eqnarray}
with the optimal weights ${\boldsymbol \beta} \in \Re^{\Nens \times \Nens}$ given by
\begin{eqnarray}
\label{eq:entkf-weights}
\displaystyle
{\boldsymbol \beta} = {\bf U}_{{\bf V}} \cdot \widehat{\boldsymbol \Sigma}_{{\bf V}} \cdot \lp \I_{\Nens \times \Nens}+\widehat{\boldsymbol \Sigma}_{{\bf V}}^T \cdot \widehat{\boldsymbol \Sigma}_{{\bf V}} \rp^{-1} \cdot {\bf V}_{{\bf V}}^T \cdot \sqrt{\R} \cdot \lp \y - \H \cdot \xm^b \rp.
\end{eqnarray}
The new ensemble members are built as follows
\begin{eqnarray}
\label{eq:entkf-new-samples}
\displaystyle
\X^a = \xm^a \otimes {\bf 1}_{\Nens}^T + \S \cdot {\bf U}_{{\bf V}} \cdot \lb \I_{\Nens \times \Nens}+\widehat{\boldsymbol \Sigma}_{{\bf V}} \cdot \widehat{\boldsymbol \Sigma}_{{\bf V}}^T\rb^{1/2} \cdot {\bf U}_{{\bf V}}^T.
\end{eqnarray}
In the ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF) \cite{EnKFEvensen} each ensemble member \eqref{eq:initial-ensemble} and the observations \eqref{eq:observations} are treated as random variables, and the $i$-th ensemble member is updated as follows:
\begin{eqnarray}
\label{eq:analysis-ensemble-members}
\displaystyle
\x^a_i = \x^b_i + \S \cdot {\boldsymbol \beta}_i \in \Re^{\Nstate \times 1} \,, \quad i = 1,\dots,\Nens\,,
\end{eqnarray}
where the optimal weights for $i$-th ensemble member are given by
\begin{eqnarray}
\label{eq:optimal-weights-ith-member}
{\boldsymbol \beta}_i = \cdot {\bf V}^T \cdot \lp \R+{\bf V} \cdot {\bf V}^T \rp^{-1} \cdot \lb \y^s_i - \H \cdot \x^b_i\rb \in \Re^{\Nens \times 1}
\end{eqnarray}
and
\begin{eqnarray}
\label{eq:observation-sample}
\displaystyle
\y^s_i \sim \Nor \lp \y,\, \R \rp \,,
\end{eqnarray}
The addition of the perturbed observations \eqref{eq:observation-sample} in the analysis provides asymptotically correct analysis-error covariance estimates for large ensemble sizes and makes the formulation of the EnKF statistical consistent \cite{Thomas2002}. However, it also has been proven that the inclusion of perturbed observations introduces sampling errors in the assimilation \cite{SamplingErrors1,SamplingErrors2}.
One of the important problems faced by current ensemble based methods is filter divergence due to the insufficient degrees of freedom ($\Nens \ll \Nstate$). To alleviate this deficiency localization is used to impose structure on the sample covariance matrix \eqref{eq:ensemble-covariance-matrix} according to the physics of the model. Intuitively, the correlations between individual model variable errors decays with distance, e.g., exponentially:
\begin{eqnarray}
\label{eq:localization}
{\boldsymbol \rho}_{ij} = \exp \lp \frac{-d \lp i,j\rp^2}{2 \cdot L^2}\rp \,,
\end{eqnarray}
where $d \lp i,j\rp$ is the physical distance between the locations of the $i$-th and $j$-th model components, and $L$ is the localization radius. The localized covariance matrix is obtained as
\begin{eqnarray}
\label{eq:forcing-to-have-structure}
\displaystyle
\P^b_{\rm Loc} = {\boldsymbol \rho} \circ \P^b \in \Re^{\Nstate \times \Nstate}.
\end{eqnarray}
where $\circ$ is the Schur product. This method can be impractical since it relies on the explicit computation of $\P^b$. Moreover, there are no guaranties that this method captures the true structure of $\B$. More sophisticated covariance estimation methods have been proposed in the context of data assimilation. A classic approximation is the Hollingworth and Lonnberg method \cite{TELA:TELA460} in which the difference between observations and background states are treated as a combination of background and observations errors. However, this method provides statistics of background errors in observation spaces, requires uniform observing network (not the case in practice), and the resulting statistics are biased towards data-dense areas. Another method has been proposed by Benedetti and Fisher \cite{QJ:QJ37} based on forecast differences in which the spatial correlations of background errors are assumed to be similar at 24 and 48 hours forecasts. This method can be efficiently implemented in practice, however, it does not perform well in data-sparse regions, and the statistics provided are a mixture of analysis and background errors. Since the structure of $\B$ remains unknown, assumptions made about its structure may increase the bias in the estimate. Furthermore, the balance of variables in the model with some physical meaning can be disturbed when localization is utilized \cite{TELA:TELA076}.
A different approach is based on the 3D-Var cost function in the ensemble space. Any vector $\x \in \Re^{\Nstate \times 1}$ in the ensemble subspace can be written as
\begin{eqnarray}
\label{eq:vector-in-ensemble-space}
\displaystyle
\x = \xm^b + {\bf U} \cdot \W
\end{eqnarray}
where ${\bf U}$ is the matrix of anomalies
\begin{eqnarray}
\label{eq:matrix-of-anomalies}
\displaystyle
{\bf U} = \lb \x^b_1 - \xm^b,\, \x^b_2 - \xm^b, \, \ldots, \, \x_{\Nens}^b - \xm^b \rb \in \Re^{\Nstate \times \Nens} \,,
\end{eqnarray}
and $\W \in \Re^{\Nens \times 1}$ is a vector to be determined. The columns of ${\bf U}$ and $\S$ span the same space. Using \eqref{eq:vector-in-ensemble-space} the 3D-Var cost function \eqref{eq:cost-function-3DVAR} in the ensemble space reads
\begin{eqnarray}
\label{eq:3Dvar-ensemble-space}
\displaystyle
\J_{\rm ens} \lp \W \rp = \frac{1}{2} \cdot \ln {\bf U} \cdot \W \right \|_{\B^{-1}}^2 + \frac{1}{2} \cdot \ln \d - \Q \cdot \W \right \|_{\R^{-1}}^2 \,,
\end{eqnarray}
where the optimal value of the control variable $\W$
\begin{eqnarray}
\label{eq:solution-ensemble-space}
\displaystyle
\W^{*} = \underset{\W}{\arg \min} \, \J_{\rm ens} \lp \W \rp \,,
\end{eqnarray}
provides the analysis state in \eqref{eq:vector-in-ensemble-space}
\begin{eqnarray}
\label{eq:analysis-state-in-the-ensemble-space}
\xm^a = \xm^b + {\bf U} \cdot \W^{*} \,.
\end{eqnarray}
Two recent formulations based on this approximation are the finite size anddual ensemble Kalman filters \cite{Bocquet2012}. These formulation avoid the intrinsic needed of inflation by choosing Jeffrey's prior for background errors:
\begin{eqnarray*}
\Prob \lp \x^b , \B \rp = \Prob_J \lp \x^b \rp \cdot \Prob_J \lp \B \rp \,,
\end{eqnarray*}
where the parameters $\x^b$ and $\B$ are assumed to be independent.
In the case of the finite size ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF-N) the cost function in the ensemble space reads
\begin{eqnarray}
\label{eq:cost-function-EnKF-N}
\displaystyle
\J_{\rm ens}^\textsc{fn} \lp \W \rp = \frac{1}{2} \ln \y - \Ho \lp \xm^b + {\bf U} \cdot \W \rp \right \|_{\R^{-1}}^2 + \frac{\Nens}{2} \cdot \log \lp 1+\frac{1}{\Nens} + \ln \W \right \|^2 \rp.
\end{eqnarray}
Minimization of this cost function provides the optimal weights in the ensemble space
\begin{eqnarray}
\label{eq:optimization-problem-EnKF-FN}
\displaystyle
\W^{*} = \underset{\W}{\arg \min} \, \J_{\rm ens}^\textsc{fn} \lp \W \rp \,,
\end{eqnarray}
and the analysis is computed via \eqref{eq:analysis-state-in-the-ensemble-space}. The projection of the analysis covariance matrix on the ensemble space is approximated by the inverse of the Hessian of \eqref{eq:cost-function-EnKF-N} at the optimal value \eqref{eq:optimization-problem-EnKF-FN}. The Hessian reads:
\begin{eqnarray}
\label{eq:Hessian-EnKF-FN}
\nabla^2_{\W,\W} \J_{\rm ens}^\textsc{fn} \lp \W \rp &=& \lb \H \cdot {\bf U} \rb^T \cdot \R^{-1} \cdot \H \cdot {\bf U} \\
\nonumber
&+& \Nens \cdot \frac{\lp 1 + \frac{1}{\Nens} + \ln \W\right \|^2 \rp \cdot \I_{\Nens \times \Nens} - 2 \cdot \W \cdot \W^T }{\lp 1+\frac{1}{\Nens} + \ln \W \right \|^2 \rp^2} \in \Re^{\Nens \times \Nens}.
\end{eqnarray}
The analysis ensemble is generated as follows:
\begin{eqnarray}
\label{eq:analysis-EnKF-N}
\displaystyle
\X^a = \xm^a \otimes {\bf 1}_{\Nens}^T + {\bf U} \cdot \lle \lp \Nens-1\rp \cdot \lb \nabla^2_{\W,\W} \J_{\rm ens}^\textsc{fn} \lp \W^{*} \rp \rb^{-1} \rle^{1/2} \cdot {\boldsymbol \Phi} \in \Re^{\Nstate \times \Nens} \,,
\end{eqnarray}
where $ {\boldsymbol \Phi}\in \Re^{\Nens \times \Nens}$ is an arbitrary orthogonal matrix which preserves the ensemble mean \eqref{eq:ensemble-mean}.
Another approach is based on the dual formulation of the cost function \eqref{eq:Hessian-EnKF-FN} \cite{Bocquet2012} %
\begin{eqnarray}
\label{eq:cost-function-EnKF-DU}
\displaystyle
\DU_{\rm ens}^\textsc{du} \lp \zeta \rp = \ln \y - \H \cdot \x^b \right \|_{{{\bf W}_{\rm \zeta}}^{-1}}^2 + \zeta \cdot \lp 1 + \frac{1}{\Nens} \rp + \Nens \cdot \log \lp \frac{\Nens}{\zeta}\rp -\Nens \,,
\end{eqnarray}
where the weighted covariance matrix ${\bf W}_{\rm \zeta}$ reads
\begin{eqnarray}
\label{eq:weighted-covariance-W-Dual}
\displaystyle
{\bf W}_{\rm \zeta} = \R+\frac{1}{\zeta} \cdot {\bf V} \cdot {\bf V}^T \in \Re^{\Nobs \times \Nobs}.
\end{eqnarray}
The dual optimization problem is one-dimansional
\begin{eqnarray}
\label{eq:optimization-problem-EnKF-DU}
\displaystyle
\zeta^{*} = \underset{ \zeta \in \lp 0, \frac{\Nens}{1+\frac{1}{\Nens}} \rb}{\arg \min} \, \DU_{\rm ens}^\textsc{du} \lp \zeta \rp
\qquad \textnormal{subject to} \quad \zeta \in \lp 0, \frac{\Nens}{1+\frac{1}{\Nens}} \rb.
\end{eqnarray}
The optimal state is computed as follows:
\begin{eqnarray}
\label{eq:optimal-analysis}
\displaystyle
\xm^a = \xm^b + {\bf U} \cdot \lb {\bf V}^T \cdot \R^{-1} \cdot {\bf V} + \zeta^{*} \cdot \I_{\Nens \times \Nens} \rb^{-1} \cdot {\bf V}^T \cdot \R^{-1} \cdot \lb \y - \H \cdot \xm^b \rb \,,
\end{eqnarray}
and the following analysis ensemble is built:
\begin{eqnarray}
\label{eq:analsysis-ensemble-EnKF-DU}
\displaystyle \X^a = \xm^a \otimes {\bf 1}_{\Nens}^T + {\bf U} \cdot \lle \lp \Nens-1 \rp \cdot \lb {\bf V}^T \cdot \R^{-1} \cdot {\bf V} + \zeta^{*} \cdot \I_{\Nens \times \Nens} \rb^{-1} \rle^{1/2} \cdot {\boldsymbol \Phi}.
\end{eqnarray}
In this paper we consider a different representation of the background error statistics by making use of shrinkage covariance estimation. The idea is not to impose any structure on $\P^b$ but to obtain a well-conditioned estimator $\widehat{\bf B}$ of the background error covariance matrix $\B$ wherein using all the possible information brought from the ensemble members. Samples from the distribution $\Nor \lp \xm^b ,\, \widehat{\bf B} \rp$ are taken in order to better represent the error statistics and to increase the number of degrees of freedom. Two novel EnKF implementations based on the Rao-Blackwell Ledoit and Wolf estimator are presented in the next section.
\section{Ensemble Filters Based on Shrinkage Covariance Estimators}
\label{sec:proposed-implementation}
In this section, we propose two efficient implementations of the EnKF based on the RBLW estimator \eqref{eq:RBLW-estimator}. As mentioned before, we do not impose any kind of structure on $\P^b$ since the information brought by the ensemble members is more than only background errors
\begin{eqnarray*}
\P^b = \B + \Q + \C \in \Re^{\Nstate \times \Nstate} \,,
\end{eqnarray*}
where $\Q$ is the covariance of model errors and $\C \in \Re^{\Nstate \times \Nstate}$ is the covariance matrix of additional errors whose sources are unknown for us. Errors coming from different sources are assumed to be uncorrelated. We seek to exploit the information brought by ensemble members and use the RBLW covariance estimator \eqref{eq:RBLW-estimator} to build a covariance matrix that captures all error correlations. The standard form of this estimatordepends on the explicit representation of $\P^b$. The efficient implementation for high-dimensional covariance matrices presented in section \ref{subsec:RBLW-EnKF} avoids the explicit computation of $\P^b$. Section \ref{subsec:enkf-rblw} discusses two EnKF implementations based on the RBLW estimator. Section \ref{subsec:sampling-high-dimensions} develops an efficient sampling method in high dimensions for drawing samples from the prior error distribution based on the RBLW estimate. Finally, section \ref{subsec:comparison-of-the-EnKF-FS-RS} discusses the similarities and differences between the two proposed implementations.
\subsection{RBLW estimator for covariance matrices in high-dimensions}
\label{subsec:RBLW-EnKF}
Consider the sample covariance matrix \eqref{eq:ensemble-covariance-matrix}.
In the context of data assimilation the RBLW estimator \eqref{eq:shinkrage-estimator},\eqref{eq:RBLW-estimator} reads
\begin{subequations}
\label{eq:EnkF-optimal-values}
\begin{eqnarray}
\label{eq:RBLW-EnKF}
\displaystyle
\widehat{\bf B} = \gamma_{\widehat{\bf B}} \cdot \mu_{\B} \cdot \I + (1 - \gamma_{\widehat{\bf B}}) \cdot \P^b \in \Re^{\Nstate \times \Nstate} \,,
\end{eqnarray}
where
\begin{eqnarray}
\label{eq:EnKF-mu-value}
\displaystyle
\mu_{\widehat{\bf B}} &=& \frac{{\rm tr} \lp \P^b \rp}{\Nstate} \,, \\
\label{eq:EnKF-gamma-value}
\gamma_{\B} &=& \min \lp \frac{\frac{\Nens-2}{ \Nstate} \cdot {\rm tr} \lp \lb\P^b \rb^2 \rp + {\rm tr}^2 \lp \P^b \rp}{\lp \Nens+2 \rp \cdot \lb {\rm tr} \lp \lb \P^b \rb^2 \rp - \frac{{\rm tr}^2 \lp \P^b \rp}{\Nstate} \rb} , \, 1 \rp \,.
\end{eqnarray}
\end{subequations}
Since the dimension of the model state is high ($\Nstate \sim \BO{10^7}$), the direct computation of \eqref{eq:RBLW-estimator-EnKF} is impractical as it requires the explicit representation of the sample covariance matrix $\P^b$. An alternative manner to compute ${\rm tr} \lp \P^b \rp$ and ${\rm tr} \lp [\P^b]^2 \rp$ is proposed. Consider the eigenvalue decomposition of $\P^b$
\begin{eqnarray}
\label{eq:Pb-SVD}
\displaystyle
\P^b = {\bf U}_{\P^b} \cdot {\boldsymbol \Sigma}_{\P^b} \cdot {\bf U}^T_{\P^b} \in \Re^{\Nstate \times \Nstate} \,,
\end{eqnarray}
where ${\boldsymbol \Sigma}_{\P^b} \in \Re^{\Nstate \times \Nstate}$ is a diagonal matrix whose diagonal components $\sigma_i$, for $1 \le i \le \Nstate$, are the eigenvalues of $\P^b$ and ${\bf U}_{\P^b} \in \Re^{\Nstate \times \Nstate}$ is a set of orthogonal basis vectors spanning the ensemble space (since $\P^b$ is rank deficient). By definitiont ${\rm tr} \lp \P^b \rp = \sum_{i=1}^{\Nstate} \sigma_i$ and ${\rm tr} \lp \lb \P^b \rb^2 \rp = \sum_{i=1}^{\Nstate} \sigma_i^2$. Since there are only $\Nens-1$ eigenvalues different from zero we obtain:
\begin{eqnarray*}
\displaystyle
{\rm tr} \lp \P^b \rp = \sum_{i=1}^{\Nens-1} \sigma_i \,, \qquad
{\rm tr} \lp \lb \P^b \rb^2 \rp = \sum_{i=1}^{\Nens-1} \sigma_i^2 \,,
\end{eqnarray*}
and the computations in the set of equations \eqref{eq:EnkF-optimal-values} can be efficiently performed whenever the first $\Nens-1$ eigenvalues of $\P^b$ can be easily obtained. Consider the singular value decomposition (SVD) for the set of basis vectors \eqref{eq:matrix-of-member-deviations}
\begin{eqnarray}
\label{eq:SVD-over-S}
\S = {\bf U}_{\S} \cdot \widehat{\boldsymbol \Sigma}_{\S} \cdot {\bf V}_{\S}^T \in \Re^{\Nstate \times \Nens} \,,
\end{eqnarray}
where $\widehat{\boldsymbol \Sigma}_{\S} \in \Re^{\Nstate \times \Nens}$ is a diagonal matrix holding the singular values $\widehat{\sigma_i}$ of $\S$, for $1\le i \le \Nens$. Likewise, ${\bf U}_{\S} \in \Re^{\Nstate \times \Nstate}$ and ${\bf V}_{\S} \in \Re^{\Nens \times \Nens}$ are the left and right singular vectors, respectively. Since $\P^b = \S \cdot \S^T $ we have ${\boldsymbol \Sigma}_{\P^b} = \widehat{\boldsymbol \Sigma}_{\S} \cdot \widehat{\boldsymbol \Sigma}_{\S}^T$ and
\begin{eqnarray*}
\displaystyle
{\rm tr} \lp \P^b \rp &=& \sum_{i=1}^{\Nens-1} \sigma_i = \sum_{i=1}^{\Nens-1} \widehat{\sigma_i}^2, \\
{\rm tr} \lp \lb \P^b \rb^2 \rp &=& \sum_{i=1}^{\Nens-1} \sigma_i^2 =\sum_{i=1}^{\Nens-1} \widehat{\sigma_i}^4.
\end{eqnarray*}
The computational effort of the SVD decomposition \eqref{eq:SVD-over-S} is $\BO{\Nens^2 \cdot \Nstate}$.
The traces in \eqref{eq:EnkF-optimal-values} can be computing without calculating the sample covariance matrix $\P^b$ by making use of the inexpensive SVD decomposition of $\S$. None of the singular vector of $\S$ are required, but only the singular values $\widehat{\sigma_i}$, for $1 \le i \le \Nens-1$. The parameter values in \eqref{eq:EnkF-optimal-values} are computed as follows:
\begin{subequations}
\label{eq:EnkF-optimal-values-efficient}
\begin{eqnarray}
\label{eq:EnKF-mu-value-efficient}
\displaystyle
\mu_{\widehat{\bf B}} &=& \frac{\sum_{i=1}^{\Nens-1} \widehat{\sigma_i}^2}{\Nstate} \,, \\
\label{eq:EnKF-gamma-value-efficient}
\gamma_{\B} &=& \min \lp \frac{\frac{\Nens-2}{ \Nstate} \cdot \sum_{i=1}^{\Nens-1} \widehat{\sigma_i}^4 + \lb \sum_{i=1}^{\Nens-1} \widehat{\sigma_i}^2 \rb^2}{\lp \Nens+2 \rp \cdot \lb \sum_{i=1}^{\Nens-1} \widehat{\sigma_i}^4 - \frac{\lb \sum_{i=1}^{\Nens-1} \widehat{\sigma_i}^2 \rb^2}{\Nstate} \rb} , \, 1 \rp \,.
\end{eqnarray}
\end{subequations}
With $\varphi = \mu_{\widehat{\bf B}} \cdot \gamma_{\widehat{\bf B}}$ and $\delta = 1 - \gamma_{\widehat{\bf B}}$ the estimated covariance matrix \eqref{eq:EnkF-optimal-values} is
\begin{eqnarray}
\label{eq:RBLW-estimator-EnKF}
\displaystyle
\widehat{\bf B} = \varphi \cdot \I_{\Nstate \times \Nstate} + \delta \cdot \S \cdot \S^T \in \Re^{\Nstate \times \Nstate}\,.
\end{eqnarray}
\subsection{EnKF implementations based on the RBLW estimator}
\label{subsec:enkf-rblw}
By replacing the estimated error covariance matrix \eqref{eq:RBLW-estimator-EnKF} in \eqref{eq:analysis-ensemble-members}, the EnKF analysis in matrix form becomes
\begin{eqnarray}
\label{eq:EnKF-cov-est}
\displaystyle
\X^a = \X^b + \widehat{\bf B} \cdot \H^T \cdot \lp \R + \H \cdot \widehat{\bf B} \cdot \H^T \rp^{-1} \cdot {\bf D} \in \Re^{\Nstate \times \Nens} \,,
\end{eqnarray}
where the matrix of innovations ${\bf D} \in \Re^{\Nobs \times \Nens}$ is
\begin{eqnarray}
\label{eq:EnKF-matrix-of-innovations}
\displaystyle
{\bf D} = \lb \y_1^s - \H \cdot \x_1^b ,\, \y_2^s - \H \cdot \x_2^b, \, \ldots,\, \y_{\Nens}^s - \H \cdot \x_{\Nens}^b \rb
\end{eqnarray}
and the data $\y^s_i$ for $1 \le i \le \Nens$ is drawn from the distribution \eqref{eq:observation-sample}. We have
\begin{eqnarray}
\nonumber
\displaystyle
\X^a &=& \X^b + \lp \varphi \cdot \I_{\Nstate \times \Nstate} + \delta \cdot \S \cdot \S^T \rp \cdot \H^T \\ \nonumber
& \cdot & \lp \R + \H \cdot \lp \varphi \cdot \I_{\Nstate \times \Nstate} + \delta \cdot \S \cdot \S^T \rp \cdot \H^T \rp^{-1} \cdot {\bf D} \\
\label{eq:EnKF-cov-summ}
\displaystyle \X^a &=& \X^b + {\bf E} \cdot {\boldsymbol \Pi} \cdot \Z_{\widehat{\bf B}} + \varphi \cdot \H^T \cdot \Z_{\widehat{\bf B}},
\end{eqnarray}
where ${\bf E} = \sqrt{\delta} \cdot \S \in \Re^{\Nstate \times \Nens}$, ${\boldsymbol \Pi} = \H \cdot {\bf E} \in \Re^{\Nobs \times \Nens}$, and $\Z_{\widehat{\bf B}} \in \Re^{\Nobs \times \Nens}$ is given by the solution of the linear system
\begin{eqnarray}
\label{eq:solution-linear-system}
\displaystyle \lp {\boldsymbol \Gamma}+ {\boldsymbol \Pi} \cdot {\boldsymbol \Pi}^T \rp \cdot \Z_{\B} &=& {\bf D} \,, \\
\nonumber
{\boldsymbol \Gamma} &=& \R+\varphi \cdot \H \cdot \H^T \in \Re^{\Nobs \times \Nobs}.
\end{eqnarray}
When $\H$ possesses a simple structure (e.g., indexes to observed components from vector states) the matrix ${\boldsymbol \Gamma}$ also has a simple structure (since in practice $\R$ is block diagonal). By letting ${\bf U}^{(0)} = {\boldsymbol \Gamma}^{-1} \cdot {\boldsymbol \Pi} \in \Re^{\Nobs \times \Nens}$ and $\Z_{\B}^{(0)} = {\boldsymbol \Gamma}^{-1} \cdot {\bf D}$, the linear system \eqref{eq:solution-linear-system} can be efficiently solved via the ISMF with no more than $\BO{\Nens^2 \cdot \Nobs}$ long computations. When ${\boldsymbol \Gamma}$ has no special structure its inverse can be calculated off-line.
In order to obtain a better representation of the background error statistics (uncertainty) about the background state \eqref{eq:ensemble-mean} additional samples can be taken from the distribution
\begin{eqnarray}
\label{eq:artificial-member}
\EX{\x}^{b}_{i} \sim \Nor \lp \xm^b ,\, \widehat{\bf B} \rp \in \Re^{\Nstate \times 1} \,,\quad 1 \le i \le K.
\end{eqnarray}
This yields to a new ensemble formed of two kinds of members, real and synthetic. The \textit{real members} $\{\x^b_i\}_{i=1}^{\Nens}$ are obtained by model propagation of the previous analysis ensemble. The \textit{synthetic members} $\{\EX{\x}^b_i\}_{i=1}^{K}$ are artificially built by taking samples from the distribution \eqref{eq:artificial-member} and do not require additional model runs.
The artificial increase in the size of the ensemble is therefore a relatively inexpensive modality to bring in additional degrees of freedom in the solution of the optimization problem \eqref{eq:solution-model-space}. Figure \ref{fig:effect-of-different-K-values} exemplifies the effect of additional members using two-dimensional projections of ensemble member states from the Lorenz 96 model. Figure \ref{K0} shows the spread of the real ensemble members (for the background uncertainty around $\xm^b$). Figures \ref{K3} shows the distribution when artificial members are added to the background ensemble, resulting in a better representation of the background error and therefore a decrease in the sampling error.
\begin{figure}[H]
\centering
\subfloat[$K = 0$]{\includegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth]{Images/K0-eps-converted-to.pdf}\label{K0}}
\subfloat[$K = 120$]{\includegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth]{Images/K3-eps-converted-to.pdf}\label{K3}}
\caption{Error distribution for different values of $K$ using two-dimensional projections of ensemble members from the Lorenz 96 model. The number of real members is $\Nens = 40$. In the plots $*$ represents real ensemble members, $+$ artificial members, and $\diamond$ is the ensemble mean.}
\label{fig:effect-of-different-K-values}
\end{figure}
The analysis state is now computed in the subspace spanned by both real and artificial members:
\begin{eqnarray}
\label{eq:extended-basis}
\xm^a \in {\bf span} \lle \x^b_1, \, \x^b_2, \, \ldots, \, \x^b_{\Nens} ,\, \EX{\x}^{b}_1, \,\EX{\x}^{b}_2, \, \ldots, \, \EX{\x}^{b}_{K} \rle.
\end{eqnarray}
The \textit{extended ensemble} reads:
\begin{eqnarray}
\label{eq:ensemble-extended-background}
\EX{\X}^{b} = \lb \x^b_1, \, \x^b_2, \, \ldots, \, \x^b_{\Nens} ,\, \EX{\x}^{b}_1, \,\EX{\x}^{b}_2, \, \ldots, \, \EX{\x}^{b}_{K} \rb \in \Re^{\Nstate \times N_k} \,.
\end{eqnarray}
where $N_k = \Nens+K$. Similar to \eqref{eq:EnKF-cov-summ}, the background ensemble \eqref{eq:ensemble-extended-background} is updated using
\begin{eqnarray}
\label{eq:ensemble-update-extended}
\displaystyle
\X^a = \X^b + \EX{{\bf E}} \cdot \EX{{\boldsymbol \Pi}} \cdot \EX{\Z}_{\widehat{\bf B}}+\varphi \cdot \H^T \cdot \EX{\Z}_{\B} \in \Re^{\Nstate \times \Nens} \,,
\end{eqnarray}
where
\begin{subequations}
\label{eq:extended-matrices-analysis}
\begin{eqnarray}
\label{eq:extend-E}
\EX{{\bf E}} &=& \sqrt{\delta} \cdot \EX{\S} \in \Re^{\Nstate \times N_k } \,, \\
\label{eq:extend-PI}
\EX{{\boldsymbol \Pi}} &=& \H \cdot \EX{{\bf E}} \in \Re^{\Nobs \times N_k} \,, \\
\label{eq:extend-Z}
\EX{\Z}_{\widehat{\bf B}} &=& \lp {\boldsymbol \Gamma}+\EX{{\boldsymbol \Pi}} \cdot {\EX{{\boldsymbol \Pi}}}^T \rp^{-1} \cdot {\bf D} \in \Re^{\Nobs \times \Nens} \,, \\
\label{eq:extend-S}
\EX{\S} &=& \EX{\X} - \xm^b \otimes {\bf 1}_{N_k}^T \in \Re^{\Nstate \times N_k} \,.
\end{eqnarray}
\end{subequations}
The solution of \eqref{eq:extend-Z} can be efficiently obtained via the ISMF. Even if the artificial members \eqref{eq:artificial-member} are used in the covariance approximation for the analysis step, according to \eqref{eq:ensemble-update-extended} only the states of real members are adjusted. After the assimilation step the artificial members are discarded and only the real members form the analysis ensemble. This strategy does not increase the number of ensemble members to be propagated by model runs (and therefore, the computational effort). When more computational resources become available, or when some real members are lost due to hardware failures, selected artificial members can be updated and propagated as well. In this case they become real members during the next assimilation step. Moreover, some real members can be replaced by artificial members such as to refresh the ensemble directions, e.g., in order to prevent filter divergence.
To summarize the above discussion, the implementation of the ensemble Kalman filter based on the RBWL estimator with weighted covariance matrix in the observation space (EnKF-FS) consists of the following steps:
\begin{enumerate}
\item Estimate the background error covariance matrix \eqref{eq:RBLW-estimator-EnKF} based on the samples $\lle \x^{b[i]} \rle_{i=1}^{\Nens}$, for $1 \le i \le \Nens$.
\item Compute the innovation matrix ${\bf D}$ according to \eqref{eq:EnKF-matrix-of-innovations}.
\item Draw $K$ artificial members from the distribution \eqref{eq:artificial-member}.
\item Compute the set of matrices \eqref{eq:extended-matrices-analysis}.
\item Perform the assimilation \eqref{eq:ensemble-update-extended}.
\item Propagate the ensemble members $$\x^{b}_{\rm next} = \M_{t_{\rm current} \rightarrow t_{\rm next}} \lp \x^{a}_{\rm current}\rp \,,$$%
until the next assimilation step, for $1 \le i \le \Nens$.
\end{enumerate}
Another efficient implementation of the filter based on the RBLW estimator can be obtained via the 3D-Var cost function in the ensemble space \eqref{eq:3Dvar-ensemble-space}. This involves projecting the weighted covariance matrix \eqref{eq:weighted-covariance-matrix} onto the ensemble space \eqref{eq:extended-basis} rather than onto the observation space.
After taking the samples \eqref{eq:artificial-member} and building the ensemble \eqref{eq:ensemble-extended-background} a new set of basis vectors can be built as follows
\begin{eqnarray}
\label{eq:basis-vectors-EnKF}
\displaystyle
\EX{{\bf U}} = \lb \x_1^b - \xm^b,\, \ldots,\, \x_{\Nens}^b- \xm^b,\EX{\x}_1^{b} - \xm^b,\, \ldots,\, \EX{\x}^b_{K}- \xm^b\rb \in \Re^{\Nstate \times N_k} \,,
\end{eqnarray}
where $\xm^b$ is given in \eqref{eq:ensemble-mean}. By replacing \eqref{eq:basis-vectors-EnKF} and the RBLW estimator of the background error covariance matrix \eqref{eq:RBLW-estimator-EnKF} in the 3D-Var cost function \eqref{eq:3Dvar-ensemble-space} we obtain
\begin{eqnarray}
\label{eq:extended-3d-var}
\displaystyle
\J_{\rm ens} \lp {\boldsymbol \lambda}\rp = \frac{1}{2} \cdot \left\Vert \EX{{\bf U}} \cdot {\boldsymbol \lambda} \right\Vert^2_{\widehat{\bf B}^{-1}} + \frac{1}{2} \cdot \ln {\bf D}-\EX{\Q} \cdot {\boldsymbol \lambda} \right \|_{\R^{-1}}^2
\end{eqnarray}
where ${\boldsymbol \lambda} \in \Re^{N_k \times \Nens}$ is the matrix of weights whose i-th column represent the coordinates of the i-th ensemble member in the space \eqref{eq:extended-basis}, for $1 \le i \le N_k$, and $\EX{\Q} = \H \cdot \EX{{\bf U}} \in \Re^{\Nobs \times N_k}$. The resulting 3D-Var optimization problem is
\begin{eqnarray}
\label{eq:optimization-problem-EnKF-RBLW-reduce-space}
\displaystyle
{\boldsymbol \lambda}^{*} = \underset{{\boldsymbol \lambda}}{\arg \min} \,\, \J_{\rm ens} \lp {\boldsymbol \lambda} \rp \,,
\end{eqnarray}
and has the solution
\begin{eqnarray}
\label{eq:optimal-weights-extended-ensemble}
\displaystyle
{\boldsymbol \lambda}^{*} = \lb \EX{{\bf U}}^T \cdot \Z_{\widehat{\bf B} {\bf U}} + \EX{\Q}^T \cdot \R^{-1} \cdot \EX{\Q} \rb^{-1} \cdot \EX{\Q}^T \cdot \R^{-1} \cdot {\bf D} \in \Re^{N_k \times \Nens} \,,
\end{eqnarray}
where $\Z_{\widehat{\bf B} {\bf U}} = \widehat{\bf B}^{-1} \cdot {\bf U} \in \Re^{\Nstate \times N_k}$. The resulting analysis ensemble is
\begin{eqnarray}
\label{eq:analysis-reduce-space}
\displaystyle
\X^a = \X^b + \EX{{\bf U}} \cdot {\boldsymbol \lambda}^{*} \in \Re^{\Nstate \times \Nens} \,.
\end{eqnarray}
To summarize, the implementation of the ensemble Kalman filter based on covariance estimation with weighted covariance matrix in the ensemble space (EnKF-FS) consists of the following steps:
\begin{enumerate}
\item Estimate the background error covariance matrix \eqref{eq:RBLW-estimator-EnKF} based on the samples $\lle \x^{b[i]} \rle_{i=1}^{\Nens}$, for $1 \le i \le \Nens$.
\item Compute the innovation matrix ${\bf D}$ according to \eqref{eq:EnKF-matrix-of-innovations}.
\item Draw $K$ artificial members according to \eqref{eq:artificial-member}.
\item Compute the matrix of optimal weights \eqref{eq:optimal-weights-extended-ensemble}.
\item Perform the assimilation \eqref{eq:analysis-reduce-space}.
\item Propagate the ensemble members $$\x^{b}_{\rm next} = \M_{t_{\rm current} \rightarrow t_{\rm next}} \lp \x^{a}_{\rm current}\rp \,,$$%
until the next assimilation step, for $1 \le i \le \Nens$.
\end{enumerate}
\subsection{Sampling in high-dimensions based on the RBLW estimator}
\label{subsec:sampling-high-dimensions}
Both implementations discussed in Section \ref{subsec:enkf-rblw} use samples from the distribution \eqref{eq:artificial-member}. Such samples can be generated as follows:
\begin{eqnarray}
\label{eq:straight-forward-computation}
\EX{\x}^{b}_i = \xm^b + \widehat{\bf B}^{1/2} \cdot \errbac_i = \xm^b + \left( \varphi \cdot \I_{\Nstate \times \Nstate} + \delta \cdot \S \cdot \S^T\right)^{1/2} \cdot \errbac_i
\end{eqnarray}
for $1 \le i \le K$, where $\errbac_i \sim \Nor \lp {\bf 0}_{\Nstate} ,\, \I_{\Nstate \times \Nstate }\rp$. However, this computation requires the explicit representation in memory of the estimated error covariance matrix $\widehat{\bf B}$, which is prohibitive for high-resolution models. Moreover, the square root matrix $\widehat{\bf B}^{1/2}$ is required making the use of \eqref{eq:straight-forward-computation} impractical.
We need an equivalent strategy to obtain the samples \eqref{eq:artificial-member} that requires a reasonable computational effort and does not use a full representation of the covariance matrix $\widehat{\bf B}$. Toward this end consider the random vectors
\begin{eqnarray*}
\displaystyle
\errbac^1_i &\sim & \Nor \lp {\bf 0}_{\Nstate},\, \I_{\Nstate \times \Nstate }\rp \in \Re^{\Nstate \times 1} \,, \\
\errbac^2_i &\sim & \Nor \lp {\bf 0}_{\Nens},\, \I_{\Nens \times \Nens }\rp \in \Re^{\Nens \times 1} \,,
\end{eqnarray*}
and let
\begin{eqnarray*}
\text{Cov} \lp \errbac^1_i ,\, \errbac^2_i \rp &=& \errbac^1_i \otimes {\errbac^2_i}^T = {\bf 0}_{\Nstate \times \Nens} \,, \\
\text{Cov} \lp \errbac_2 ,\, \errbac_1 \rp &=& \errbac^2_i \otimes {\errbac^1_i}^T = {\bf 0}_{\Nens \times \Nstate} \,.
\end{eqnarray*}
We make the following substitution in \eqref{eq:straight-forward-computation}
\[
{\widehat{\bf B}}^{1/2} \cdot \errbac_i \sim \sqrt{\varphi} \cdot \errbac^1_i + \sqrt{\delta} \cdot \S \cdot \errbac^2_i.
\]
This does not change the statistics since
\begin{eqnarray*}
&& \expect \lb \lp \sqrt{\varphi} \cdot \I_{\Nstate \times \Nstate} \cdot \errbac^1_i + \sqrt{\delta} \cdot \S \cdot \errbac^2_i \rp \cdot \lp \sqrt{\varphi} \cdot \I_{\Nstate \times \Nstate} \cdot \errbac^1_i + \sqrt{\delta} \cdot \S \cdot \errbac^2_i \rp^T \rb \\
&&= \varphi \cdot \underbrace{ \errbac^1_i \otimes {\errbac^1_i}^T}_{\text{Cov}\lp \errbac^1_i,\errbac^1_i\rp = \I_{\Nstate \times \Nstate}} + \sqrt{\varphi \cdot \delta} \cdot \underbrace{ \errbac^1_i \otimes {\errbac^2_i}^T}_{\text{Cov}\lp \errbac^1_i,\errbac^2_i\rp = {\bf 0}_{\Nstate \times \Nens}} + \sqrt{\varphi \cdot \delta} \cdot \underbrace{ \errbac^2_i \otimes {\errbac^1_i}^T}_{\text{Cov}\lp \errbac^2_i,\errbac^1_i\rp = {\bf 0}_{\Nens \times \Nstate}} \\
&&\quad + \delta \cdot \S \cdot \underbrace{ \errbac^2_i \otimes {\errbac^2_i}^T}_{\text{Cov}\lp \errbac^2_i,\errbac^2_i\rp = \I_{\Nens \times \Nens}} \cdot \S^T = \varphi \cdot \I_{\Nstate \times \Nstate} + \delta \cdot \S \cdot \S^T \\
&&= \widehat{\bf B} \,.
\end{eqnarray*}
The artificial ensemble members are obtained as follows:
\begin{eqnarray}
\label{eq:efficient-compute-artificial-members}
\displaystyle
\EX{\x}^{b}_{i} = \xm^b + \sqrt{\varphi} \cdot \I_{\Nstate \times \Nstate} \cdot \errbac^1_i + \sqrt{\delta} \cdot \S \cdot \errbac^2_i,
\quad i=1,\dots,K.
\end{eqnarray}
The components of the random variables $\errbac^1_i$ and $\errbac^2_i$ are drawn independently from the standard normal distribution $\Nor \lp 0,\,1 \rp$. For large model resolutions the components of the random vectors can be prepared independently taking advantage of parallel computations. Moreover, the random vectors $\errbac^1_i$ and $\errbac^2_i$ can be sampled prior the assimilation process in an off-line computation.
The estimated error covariance matrix is never represented explicitly in memory. Instead, the estimator $\widehat{\bf B}$ is represented via the triplet
\begin{eqnarray*}
\widehat{\bf B} \equiv \lb \varphi,\, \mu,\, \S \rb \,.
\end{eqnarray*}
which contains two scalars and one matrix of dimension $\Nstate \times \Nens$. In addition, the scalars $\varphi$ and $\mu$ are computed making use only of the matrix $\S$. This data is sufficient for correct sampling from the distribution \eqref{eq:artificial-member}.
\subsection{Comparison of EnKF-FS and EnKF-RS versions of the filter}
\label{subsec:comparison-of-the-EnKF-FS-RS}
Although both EnKF-FS and EnKF-RS methods are based on the EnKF equations and RBLW estimator, their underlying theoretical properties are slightly different. To facilitate the comparison of the two proposed implementations we bring the EnKF-FS analysis equation \eqref{eq:ensemble-update-extended} to the form \eqref{eq:analysis-state-general}:
\begin{eqnarray}
\label{eq:equivalent-to-analysis-solution}
\displaystyle
\X^a = \X^b +\widehat{\bf B}^{1/2} \cdot \W_{\widehat{\bf B}} \in \Re^{\Nstate \times \Nens} \,,
\end{eqnarray}
where the weights $\W_{\widehat{\bf B}} \in \Re^{\Nstate \times \Nens}$ are given by
\begin{eqnarray*}
\displaystyle
\W_{\widehat{\bf B}} = \widehat{\bf B}^{1/2} \cdot \H^T \lp \R+\H \cdot \widehat{\bf B} \cdot \H^T \rp^{-1} \cdot {\bf D} \in \Re^{\Nstate \times \Nens} \,.
\end{eqnarray*}
It is readily apparent from equations \eqref{eq:equivalent-to-analysis-solution} and \eqref{eq:analysis-reduce-space} that EnKF-FS and EnKF-RS implementations differ in the number of degrees of freedom used in the assimilation process. In the EnKF-FS approach the columns of $\widehat{\bf B}^{1/2}$ serve as the basis set for generating an ensemble of background deviations. Since the estimated background error covariance matrix is full-rank the optimal solution \eqref{eq:optimal-analysis} is searched for in the full space.
The matrix identity
\begin{eqnarray*}
\lb \widehat{\bf B}^{-1} + \H^T \cdot \R^{-1} \cdot \H \rb^{-1} \cdot \H^T \cdot \R^{-1} \equiv \widehat{\bf B} \cdot \H^T \cdot \lb \R+ \H \cdot \widehat{\bf B} \cdot \H^T \rb^{-1}
\end{eqnarray*}
together with \eqref{eq:equivalent-to-analysis-solution} reveal that the weighted covariance matrix of the EnKF-FS implementation
\begin{eqnarray}
\label{eq:weighted-covariance-matrix-for-EnKFFS}
\displaystyle
{\bf W} = \widehat{\bf B}^{-1} + \H^T \cdot \R^{-1} \cdot \H \in \Re^{\Nstate \times \Nstate} \,,
\end{eqnarray}
is related to the weighted covariance matrix of the EnKF-RS method by the relation
\begin{eqnarray}
\label{eq:weighted-covariance-matrix-for-EnKFRS}
\displaystyle
{\bf W}_{\rm ens} = \EX{{\bf U}}^T \cdot {\bf W} \cdot \EX{{\bf U}} \in \Re^{N_k \times N_k}\,.
\end{eqnarray}
Threfore when the size of the ensemble $N_k$ is increased (by adding real or artificial members) more information from the matrix ${\bf W}$ is captured by its projection onto the $N_k$-dimensional space. Note that when $N_k \rightarrow \Nstate$ and $\EX{{\bf U}}$ is orthonormal we have that ${\bf W}_{\rm ens} \to {\bf W}$. Consequently, the number of artificial members will play an important role in the performance of the EnKF-RS implementation.
\section{Experimental Results}
\label{sec:experimental-results}
This section tests the new EnKF implementations on a data assimilation problem using the quasi-geostrophic model presented in \cite{TELA:TELA299}. A comparison is done in two steps: first, the proposed implementations are compared against the well-known EnKF implementations presented in section \ref{sec:preliminaries}, and next the quality of the results for the EnKF-FS and EnKF-RS based on different values of $\Nens$ and $K$ are assessed.
The oceans form a complex flow system influenced by the rotation of the Earth, the density stratification due to temperature and salinity, as well as other factors. The quasi-geostrophic (QG) model is a simple approximation of the
real behavior of the ocean. It is defined by the following partial differential equation:
\begin{eqnarray}
\label{eq:QG-model}
\displaystyle { \omega}_t + r \cdot J \lp { \omega},\, { \psi} \rp + \beta \cdot { \psi}_{x} - v \cdot \nabla^4 { \psi} = - \mu \cdot \nabla^2 { \psi} + \tau \cdot \sin \lp \frac{2 \cdot \pi \cdot y }{L_y} \rp
\end{eqnarray}
in $\Omega \in [0,\, L_x] \times [0,\,L_y]$, where $x$ and $y$ represent the horizontal and vertical space components, ${\omega}$ is the vorticity, $\psi$ is the stream function, $J \lp { \psi}, { \omega}\rp $ is the Jacobian of two fields
\begin{eqnarray}
\label{eq:QG-Jacobian}
\displaystyle
J \lp { \psi}, { \omega}\rp = { \psi}_x \cdot { \omega}_y - { \psi}_y \cdot { \omega}_x \,,
\end{eqnarray}
and $\nabla^2$ is the Laplacian operator. The coefficients $\beta$, $v$, $\mu$ and $\tau$ are associated with the horizontal vorticity, the horizontal friction, the biharmonic horizontal friction, and the horizontal wind stress at the surface of the ocean, respectively. Moreover, the vorticity is related to the stream function by the elliptical equation:
\begin{eqnarray}
\displaystyle
\nabla^2 { \psi} = {\omega} \,.
\end{eqnarray}
The spatial domain for our experiments is $\Omega = [0,\,1] \times [0,\,1]$. The interior is covered by computational grids of different resolutions, and we denote by $D_1$ and $D_2$ the number of horizontal and vertical grid points, respectively. The different model resolutions are presented in the table \ref{tab:qg-instances}.
\begin{table}[H]
\centering
\begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|} \hline
Instance & $D_1$ & $D_2$ & $\Nstate = D_1 \cdot D_2$ \\ \hline
$QG_{33 \times 33}$& 31 & 31 & 961 \\ \hline
$QG_{65 \times 65}$& 63 & 63 & 3,969 \\ \hline
$QG_{129 \times 129}$& 127 & 127 & 16,129 \\ \hline
\end{tabular}
\caption{Quasi-geostrophic instances for the computational tests in terms of the number of horizontal $D_1$ and vertical $D_2$ grid points. $D_1$ and $D_2$ do not consider boundary points.}
\label{tab:qg-instances}
\end{table}
The numerical data assimilation experiments are characterized by the following settings:
\begin{itemize}
\item Initial vorticities have the form
\begin{eqnarray*}
\displaystyle
{\omega_0} = \sin(4 \, x_i \, y_j) \cdot \cos(2 \, x_i \, y_j)+\sin(2 \, x_i \, y_j)+\cos(4 \, x_i \, y_j)\,,
\end{eqnarray*}
for $1 \le i \le D_1$ and $1 \le j \le D_2$.
\item The initial background error covariance is
\begin{eqnarray*}
\displaystyle
\B = \lb \sigma^{\B} \rb^2 \cdot \I_{\Nstate \times \Nstate} ,\,
\end{eqnarray*}
where the standard deviation $\sigma^{\B}$ is chosen to be $0.05$ or $0.15$ (times the true vorticity) in different experiments .
\item The observational errors are uncorrelated with variances $\lb 0.01 \rb^2$.
\item The number of observed components from the vector state is given by
\begin{eqnarray}
\Nobs = p \cdot \Nstate \,,
\end{eqnarray}
where $p$ is the percentage of observed components. We consider two values for $p$, 0.7 and 0.9, corresponding to a sparser and a denser network, respectively.
\end{itemize}
Other aspects of the numerical simulation are described below:
\begin{itemize}
\item The EnKF methods are implemented in C++ while the forward model (QG) \cite{QGPavelSakov} is implemented making use of FORTRAN.
\item The partial derivatives are discretized by central finite differences.
\item The matrix and vector computations are efficiently carried out using the BLAS library \cite{BLASLIB}.
\item Matrix decompositions as well as eigenvalue computations are performed using the LAPACK library \cite{LAPACKLIB}.
\item The Arakawa method \cite{Jespersen1974383} is utilized in order to compute the Jacobian \eqref{eq:QG-Jacobian}.
\item The time discretization of the model \eqref{eq:QG-model} uses of a fourth order Runge-Kutta method. The time step size $1.27$ (units) which represent one hour in the ocean. The integration is performed for 1000 hours.
\item The NLOPT library \cite{NLOPT} is utilized to numerically solve the optimization problems \eqref{eq:cost-function-EnKF-N} and \eqref{eq:cost-function-EnKF-DU}.
\item The GSL-GNU scientific library \cite{GSL-GNU} is utilized to generate the synthetic background and data errors.
\end{itemize}
\subsection{Comparison with current EnKF implementations}
We compare the EnKF-RS and EnKF-FS methods against current well-known EnKF implementations. The root mean square errors (RMSE) and CPU times for different methods making use of the $QG_{33 \times 33}$, $QG_{65 \times 65}$ and $QG_{129 \times 129}$ model instances are reported inTables \ref{tab:rmse-time-nrefin-5}, \ref{tab:rmse-time-nrefin-6}, and \ref{tab:rmse-time-nrefin-7}, respectively. {For a given number of snapshots $\lle \x^a_i \rle_{i=1}^{\N}$ and a reference trajectory $\lle \x^{\rm true}_i \rle_{i=1}^{\N}$, where $\N$ is the number of assimilation times, the RMSE is defined as follows
\begin{eqnarray*}
\text{RMSE} = \sqrt{\frac{1}{\N} \cdot \sum_{i=1}^\N \ln \x_i^a - \x^{\rm true}_i\right \|^2 }.
\end{eqnarray*}
We vary the size of the ensemble $\Nens$, the percentage of observed components $p$, and the initial background error $\sigma^{\B}$. As expected the traditional ensemble implementations EnKF, EnSRF, and EnTKF provide accurate analyses for different model resolutions and number of observed components. Moreover it can be seen in figures \ref{fig:Comparison-Nens-40} and \ref{fig:Comparison-Nens-80} that the RMSE decreases as the simulation progresses. The traditional EnKF implementations provide the lowest elapsed time among the compared methods (i.e., EnKF and EnSRF implementations) which explains why they are attractive for use in real applications. The RMSE values for the EnSRF and EnTKF implementations are identical since both filters are deterministic and EnTKF is just an efficient implementation of the EnSRF. The inflation-free methods such as the EnKF-FN and EnK-DU implementations provide slightly better accurate results than other methods. For example, for the largest instance $QG_{129 \times 129}$, table \ref{tab:rmse-time-nrefin-7} shows the EnKF-DU to perform better than current implementations. In most of the cases, strong duality holds: $\J^\textsc{fn}_{ens}(\W^{*}) = \DU_{ens}^\textsc{du}(\zeta^{*})$ and the slight differences between the optimal cost function values \eqref{eq:cost-function-EnKF-N} and \eqref{eq:cost-function-EnKF-DU} are consistent with the numerical approximation errors in the solution of the optimization problems \eqref{eq:optimization-problem-EnKF-FN} and \eqref{eq:optimization-problem-EnKF-DU}, respectively.
Since the analysis state in the EnKF-DU formulation is obtained via the solution of the one-dimensional optimization problem \eqref{eq:optimization-problem-EnKF-DU}, we expect this method to be faster than the EnKF-FN implementation where the analysis requires the solution of the $\Nens$-dimensional optimization problem \eqref{eq:cost-function-EnKF-N}. This fact is also pointed out by Boquet in \cite[Section 2.2]{Bocquet2012}, where the cost of computing the inverse \eqref{eq:weighted-covariance-W-Dual} is assumed to be negligible in the dual formulation. However, this statement seems to be true for small model resolutions (i.e., Bocquet makes use of the Lorenz 96 model with 40 variables) and it holds for the smallest QG instance $QG_{33 \times 33}$. Nevertheless, for the $QG_{65 \times 65}$ case, the difference between the CPU times for the primal and dual implementations is almost negligible and even more, for the largest instance $QG_{129 \times 129}$, the EnKF-FN performs better than its dual approach for $\sigma^{\B} = 0.15$. Although the cost function \eqref{eq:cost-function-EnKF-DU} depends only on $\zeta$, every step in the optimization process requires the solution of the linear system \eqref{eq:weighted-covariance-W-Dual} whose computational cost is not negligible in practice. Furthermore, when the initial background error is large the EnKF-DU computes many times the inverse of \eqref{eq:weighted-covariance-W-Dual} and therefore its performance decreases considerably.
Even if the traditional implementations perform very well in terms of RMSE and elapsed time, the most accurate results are obtained by the proposed new EnKF implementations. The results presented in figures \ref{fig-40-07-001-005-5} and \ref{fig-80-07-001-005-5} show that the EnKF-RS method performs much better than traditional and inflation-free methods for the small instance $QG_{33 \times 33}$, and are slightly better in the larger instances. The most accurate results among all the compared methods are the ones obtained by the EnKF-FS implementation. The results reported in figures \ref{fig:Comparison-Nens-40} and \ref{fig:Comparison-Nens-80} show that, for all the instances and configurations, the RMSE obtained via the EnKF-FS outperforms the other methods by at least 60\%. The CPU times for the proposed implementations are just slightly larger than those from the compared EnKF implementations. Since most of the computational time is spent in propagating the ensemble members, a modest increase in analysis time retains the potential of the new methods to perform well in practical applications.
\begin{table}[H]
\centering
\begin{tabular}{|c|c|l|c|c|c|c|} \cline{4-7}
\multicolumn{1}{c}{ } & \multicolumn{1}{c}{ } & \multicolumn{1}{c}{ } &\multicolumn{2}{|c|}{RMSE} & \multicolumn{2}{|c|}{CPU Time} \\ \cline{4-7}
\multicolumn{1}{c}{ }& \multicolumn{1}{c}{ } & \multicolumn{1}{c}{ } &\multicolumn{2}{|c|}{$\sigma^{\B}$} & \multicolumn{2}{|c|}{$\sigma^{\B}$} \\ \hline
$\Nens$ & $p$ & Method & 0.05 & 0.15 & 0.05 & 0.15 \\ \hline
\multirow{14}{*}{40} & \multirow{7}{*}{0.7} & EnKF & 1.287 & 3.858& 0.013 & 0.009 \\
& & EnSRF & 1.289 & 3.864& 0.013 & 0.013 \\
& & EnTKF & 1.289 & 3.864& 0.026 & 0.028 \\
& & EnKF-FN & 1.286 & 3.855& 0.125 & 0.116 \\
& & EnKF-DU & 1.285 & 3.854& 0.045 & 0.036 \\
& & EnKF-FS & 0.659 & 1.974& 0.024 & 0.036 \\
& & EnKF-RS & 1.16 & 3.49& 0.421 & 0.252 \\ \cline{2-7}
& \multirow{7}{*}{0.9} & EnKF & 1.279 & 3.836& 0.019 & 0.021 \\
& & EnSRF & 1.282 & 3.841& 0.01 & 0.017 \\
& & EnTKF & 1.282 & 3.841& 0.028 & 0.017 \\
& & EnKF-FN & 1.279 & 3.831& 0.115 & 0.115 \\
& & EnKF-DU & 1.276 & 3.828& 0.072 & 0.087 \\
& & EnKF-FS & 0.371 & 1.116& 0.048 & 0.028 \\
& & EnKF-RS & 1.07 & 3.209& 0.395 & 0.222 \\ \hline
\multirow{14}{*}{80} & \multirow{7}{*}{0.7} & EnKF & 1.268 & 3.803& 0.065 & 0.061 \\
& & EnSRF & 1.275 & 3.82& 0.034 & 0.052 \\
& & EnTKF & 1.275 & 3.82& 0.143 & 0.076 \\
& & EnKF-FN & 1.264 & 3.79& 0.608 & 0.681 \\
& & EnKF-DU & 1.263 & 3.79& 0.162 & 0.181 \\
& & EnKF-FS & 0.646 & 1.927& 0.119 & 0.105 \\
& & EnKF-RS & 1.069 & 3.144& 1.303 & 1.285 \\ \cline{2-7}
& \multirow{7}{*}{0.9} & EnKF & 1.252 & 3.756& 0.074 & 0.077 \\
& & EnSRF & 1.26 & 3.773& 0.058 & 0.051 \\
& & EnTKF & 1.26 & 3.773& 0.168 & 0.12 \\
& & EnKF-FN & 1.249 & 3.737& 0.894 & 0.766 \\
& & EnKF-DU & 1.246 & 3.737& 0.155 & 0.181 \\
& & EnKF-FS & 0.358 & 1.074& 0.192 & 0.14 \\
& & EnKF-RS & 0.879 & 2.588& 1.269 & 1.26 \\ \hline
\end{tabular}
\caption{RMSE and CPU-time (TIME) for the EnKF, EnSRF, EnTKF, EnKF-FN, EnKF-DU, EnKF-RS and EnKF-FS implementations applied to the $QG_{33 \times 33}$ instance ($\Nstate = 961$).}
\label{tab:rmse-time-nrefin-5}
\end{table}
\begin{table}[H]
\centering
\begin{tabular}{|c|c|l|c|c|c|c|} \cline{4-7}
\multicolumn{1}{c}{ } & \multicolumn{1}{c}{ } & \multicolumn{1}{c}{ } &\multicolumn{2}{|c|}{RMSE} & \multicolumn{2}{|c|}{CPU Time} \\ \cline{4-7}
\multicolumn{1}{c}{ }& \multicolumn{1}{c}{ } & \multicolumn{1}{c}{ } &\multicolumn{2}{|c|}{$\sigma^{\B}$} & \multicolumn{2}{|c|}{$\sigma^{\B}$} \\ \hline
$\Nens$ & $p$ & Method & 0.05 & 0.15 & 0.05 & 0.15 \\ \hline
\multirow{14}{*}{40} & \multirow{7}{*}{0.7} & EnKF & 1.67 & 5.011& 0.072 & 0.076 \\
& & EnSRF & 1.675 & 5.025& 0.059 & 0.047 \\
& & EnTKF & 1.675 & 5.025& 0.056 & 0.098 \\
& & EnKF-FN & 1.671 & 4.987& 0.185 & 0.261 \\
& & EnKF-DU & 1.662 & 4.987& 0.17 & 0.245 \\
& & EnKF-FS & 0.893 & 2.668& 0.108 & 0.205 \\
& & EnKF-RS & 1.61 & 4.818& 1.869 & 1.801 \\ \cline{2-7}
& \multirow{7}{*}{0.9} & EnKF & 1.667 & 5.001& 0.095 & 0.061 \\
& & EnSRF & 1.671 & 5.015& 0.06 & 0.035 \\
& & EnTKF & 1.671 & 5.015& 0.067 & 0.117 \\
& & EnKF-FN & 1.667 & 4.975& 0.262 & 0.269 \\
& & EnKF-DU & 1.658 & 4.975& 0.273 & 0.244 \\
& & EnKF-FS & 0.52 & 1.533& 0.209 & 0.139 \\
& & EnKF-RS & 1.589 & 4.761& 1.975 & 2.011 \\ \hline
\multirow{14}{*}{80} & \multirow{7}{*}{0.7} & EnKF & 1.653 & 4.958& 0.189 & 0.189 \\
& & EnSRF & 1.661 & 4.982& 0.174 & 0.183 \\
& & EnTKF & 1.661 & 4.982& 0.265 & 0.377 \\
& & EnKF-FN & 1.644 & 4.915& 0.934 & 0.919 \\
& & EnKF-DU & 1.638 & 4.916& 0.567 & 0.787 \\
& & EnKF-FS & 0.866 & 2.592& 0.634 & 0.495 \\
& & EnKF-RS & 1.546 & 4.612& 7.627 & 7.542 \\ \cline{2-7}
& \multirow{7}{*}{0.9} & EnKF & 1.65 & 4.949& 0.271 & 0.302 \\
& & EnSRF & 1.657 & 4.97& 0.227 & 0.181 \\
& & EnTKF & 1.657 & 4.97& 0.428 & 0.429 \\
& & EnKF-FN & 1.639 & 4.888& 1.099 & 1.01 \\
& & EnKF-DU & 1.63 & 4.888& 0.85 & 0.936 \\
& & EnKF-FS & 0.494 & 1.486& 0.607 & 0.502 \\
& & EnKF-RS & 1.507 & 4.509& 7.845 & 8.012 \\ \hline
\end{tabular}
\caption{RMSE and CPU-time (TIME) for the EnKF, EnSRF, EnTKF, EnKF-FN, EnKF-DU, EnKF-RS and EnKF-FS implementations applied to the $QG_{65 \times 65}$ instance ($\Nstate = 3969$).}
\label{tab:rmse-time-nrefin-6}
\end{table}
\begin{table}[H]
\centering
\begin{tabular}{|c|c|l|c|c|c|c|} \cline{4-7}
\multicolumn{1}{c}{ } & \multicolumn{1}{c}{ } & \multicolumn{1}{c}{ } &\multicolumn{2}{|c|}{RMSE} & \multicolumn{2}{|c|}{CPU Time} \\ \cline{4-7}
\multicolumn{1}{c}{ }& \multicolumn{1}{c}{ } & \multicolumn{1}{c}{ } &\multicolumn{2}{|c|}{$\sigma^{\B}$} & \multicolumn{2}{|c|}{$\sigma^{\B}$} \\ \hline
$\Nens$ & $p$ & Method & 0.05 & 0.15 & 0.05 & 0.15 \\ \hline
\multirow{14}{*}{40} & \multirow{7}{*}{0.7} & EnKF & 1.708 & 5.125& 0.307 & 0.186 \\
& & EnSRF & 1.712 & 5.136& 0.174 & 0.153 \\
& & EnTKF & 1.712 & 5.136& 0.237 & 0.223 \\
& & EnKF-FN & 1.707 & 5.1& 0.793 & 0.589 \\
& & EnKF-DU & 1.7 & 5.1& 0.788 & 0.746 \\
& & EnKF-FS & 0.963 & 2.847& 0.572 & 0.611 \\
& & EnKF-RS & 1.682 & 5.042& 5.607 & 5.832 \\ \cline{2-7}
& \multirow{7}{*}{0.9} & EnKF & 1.709 & 5.127& 0.263 & 0.277 \\
& & EnSRF & 1.712 & 5.134& 0.166 & 0.192 \\
& & EnTKF & 1.712 & 5.134& 0.294 & 0.296 \\
& & EnKF-FN & 1.704 & 5.089& 0.888 & 0.849 \\
& & EnKF-DU & 1.696 & 5.089& 1.047 & 1.041 \\
& & EnKF-FS & 0.582 & 1.661& 0.627 & 0.745 \\
& & EnKF-RS & 1.676 & 5.02& 6.368 & 6.292 \\ \hline
\multirow{14}{*}{80} & \multirow{7}{*}{0.7} & EnKF & 1.702 & 5.104& 0.721 & 0.693 \\
& & EnSRF & 1.709 & 5.125& 0.554 & 0.576 \\
& & EnTKF & 1.709 & 5.125& 0.838 & 0.734 \\
& & EnKF-FN & 1.69 & 5.063& 3.085 & 2.596 \\
& & EnKF-DU & 1.687 & 5.063& 2.826 & 2.931 \\
& & EnKF-FS & 0.941 & 2.81& 2.191 & 2.373 \\
& & EnKF-RS & 1.654 & 4.94& 26.384 & 26.355 \\ \cline{2-7}
& \multirow{7}{*}{0.9} & EnKF & 1.7 & 5.099& 0.834 & 0.991 \\
& & EnSRF & 1.708 & 5.123& 0.667 & 0.729 \\
& & EnTKF & 1.708 & 5.123& 0.924 & 0.963 \\
& & EnKF-FN & 1.683 & 5.034& 4.07 & 3.485 \\
& & EnKF-DU & 1.678 & 5.034& 3.565 & 3.501 \\
& & EnKF-FS & 0.558 & 1.622& 2.745 & 2.442 \\
& & EnKF-RS & 1.634 & 4.908& 27.672 & 26.208 \\ \hline
\end{tabular}
\caption{RMSE and CPU-time for for the EnKF, EnSRF, EnTKF, EnKF-FN, EnKF-DU, EnKF-RS and EnKF-FS implementations applied to the $QG_{129 \times 129}$ instance ($\Nstate = 16129$).}
\label{tab:rmse-time-nrefin-7}
\end{table}%
\begin{figure}
\centering
\subfloat[$\Nstate = 961$ and $\sigma^B = 0.05$]{\includegraphics[width=0.4\textwidth]{Images/fig-40-07-001-005-5-eps-converted-to.pdf}\label{fig-40-07-001-005-5}} %
\subfloat[$\Nstate = 961$ and $\sigma^B = 0.15$]{\includegraphics[width=0.4\textwidth]{Images/fig-40-07-001-015-5-eps-converted-to.pdf}\label{fig-40-07-001-015-5}}
\subfloat[$\Nstate = 3969$ and $\sigma^B = 0.05$]{\includegraphics[width=0.4\textwidth]{Images/fig-40-07-001-005-6-eps-converted-to.pdf}\label{fig-40-07-001-005-6}} %
\subfloat[$\Nstate = 3969$ and $\sigma^B = 0.15$]{\includegraphics[width=0.4\textwidth]{Images/fig-40-07-001-015-6-eps-converted-to.pdf}\label{fig-40-07-001-015-6}}
\subfloat[$\Nstate = 16129$ and $\sigma^B = 0.05$]{\includegraphics[width=0.4\textwidth]{Images/fig-40-07-001-005-7-eps-converted-to.pdf}\label{fig-40-07-001-005-7}} %
\subfloat[$\Nstate = 16129$ and $\sigma^B = 0.15$]{\includegraphics[width=0.4\textwidth]{Images/fig-40-07-001-015-7-eps-converted-to.pdf}\label{fig-40-07-001-015-7}}
\caption{Plots of RMSE values for the EnKF, EnSRF, EnTKF, EnKF-FN, EnKF-DU, EnKF-FS and EnKF-RS for $\Nens = 40$ and $p = 0.7$.}
\label{fig:Comparison-Nens-40}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure}
\centering
\subfloat[$\Nstate = 961$ and $\sigma^B = 0.05$]{\includegraphics[width=0.4\textwidth]{Images/fig-80-07-001-005-5-eps-converted-to.pdf}\label{fig-80-07-001-005-5}} %
\subfloat[$\Nstate = 961$ and $\sigma^B = 0.15$]{\includegraphics[width=0.4\textwidth]{Images/fig-80-07-001-015-5-eps-converted-to.pdf}\label{fig-80-07-001-015-5}}
\subfloat[$\Nstate = 3969$ and $\sigma^B = 0.05$]{\includegraphics[width=0.4\textwidth]{Images/fig-80-07-001-005-6-eps-converted-to.pdf}\label{fig-80-07-001-005-6}} %
\subfloat[$\Nstate = 3969$ and $\sigma^B = 0.15$]{\includegraphics[width=0.4\textwidth]{Images/fig-80-07-001-015-6-eps-converted-to.pdf}\label{fig-80-07-001-015-6}}
\subfloat[$\Nstate = 16129$ and $\sigma^B = 0.05$]{\includegraphics[width=0.4\textwidth]{Images/fig-80-07-001-005-7-eps-converted-to.pdf}\label{fig-80-07-001-005-7}} %
\subfloat[$\Nstate = 16129$ and $\sigma^B = 0.15$]{\includegraphics[width=0.4\textwidth]{Images/fig-80-07-001-015-7-eps-converted-to.pdf}\label{fig-80-07-001-015-7}}
\caption{Plots of RMSE values of the EnKF, EnSRF, EnTKF, EnKF-FN, EnKF-DU, EnKF-FS and EnKF-RS for $\Nens = 80$ and $p = 0.7$.}
\label{fig:Comparison-Nens-80}
\end{figure}
\subsection{The impact of the number of ensemble members on performance}
The EnKF-RS and EnKF-FS implementations depend on the $K$ samples taken from the distribution \eqref{eq:artificial-member}. We now study how the performance of the proposed methods varies for different values of $\Nens$ (number of real members) and $K$ (number of artificial members). For this we let $K$ and $\Nens$ to be related by
\begin{eqnarray*}
K = C \cdot \Nens \,,
\end{eqnarray*}
where $C$ is a constant. Practical ensemble sizes range in $40 \le \Nens \le 80$ \cite{EnKF1657419}. For each ensemble size we use several values of $C$ between $0$ and $10$, e.g., $\Nens = 40$ and $C=10$ lead to $K = 400$. When $C=0$ no artificial members are added, but the error covariance matrix $\widehat{\bf B}$ is estimated. In the numerical experiments, the variances of the initial background error are set to $\sigma^{\B} = 0.15$. The analyses RMSE values and the compute times for the proposed implementations using the $QG_{33 \times 33}$ instance are reported in figures \ref{fig:RMSE-proposed-methods} and \ref{fig:TIME-proposed-methods}, respectively. The analysis times for both implementations are small. Moreover, as expected, EnKF-RS is sensitive to changes in any of the parameters $\Nens$ and $K$. The RMSE is decreased when the values of those parameters are high as shown in figures \ref{ERMSE_5_7_07} and \ref{ERMSE_5_7_09}. The RMSE of the EnKF-FS analysis decreases only with increasing $\Nens$ as can be seen in figures \ref{ERMSE_5_6_07} and \ref{ERMSE_5_6_09}.
An important question is how well do the proposed implementations perform with a small number of real members. Hopefully the inexpensive addition of artificial members can compensate for a small number of real ones. To this end we consider a small number of real members $10 \le \Nens \le 30$ and a large number of artificial members with $10 \le C \le 60$. The results for the EnKF-RS are shown in figures \ref{ERMSE2_5_6_07} and \ref{ERMSE2_5_6_09} for $p$ equal to 0.7 and 0.9, respectively. The EnKF-RS implementation improves the estimated analysis state whenever $\Nens$ or $K$ are increased. Moreover, the quality of the analyses obtained with small real ensembles ($10 \le \Nens \le 30$) is comparable to those obtained with large real ensemble sizes ($40 \le \Nens \le 80$). This justifies the addition of inexpensive artificial members in order to increase the degrees of freedom of the ensemble. The EnKF-FS analysis improves only when the number of real members is increased. This can be seen in figures \ref{ERMSE2_5_6_07} and \ref{ERMSE2_5_6_09}. For the smallest ensemble size ($\Nens =10$) the results obtained by the EnKF-FS are better than those of any other implementation, including the traditional EnKF implementations with the large ensemble size $\Nens=80$.
Figures \ref{ERMSE2_5_7_07} and \ref{ERMSE2_5_7_09} show that the EnKF-RS analyses for a small number of observed components (70\%) and a large number of artificial members ($K$) are equivalent to those obtained with a large number of real members ($\Nens$) and many observed components (90\%). This is another indication of the positive impact obtained by increasing the number of degrees of freedom with samples from the distribution \eqref{eq:artificial-member}. This is computationally less expensive than adding real members via running the model.
\begin{figure}[H]
\centering
\subfloat[EnKF-FS $p = 0.7$]{\includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth]{Images/ERMSE_5_6_07-eps-converted-to.pdf}\label{ERMSE_5_6_07}} %
\subfloat[EnKF-RS $p = 0.7$]{\includegraphics[width=0.48\textwidth]{Images/ERMSE_5_7_07-eps-converted-to.pdf}\label{ERMSE_5_7_07}}
\subfloat[EnKF-FS $p = 0.9$]{\includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth]{Images/ERMSE_5_6_09-eps-converted-to.pdf}\label{ERMSE_5_6_09}} %
\subfloat[EnKF-RS $p = 0.9$]{\includegraphics[width=0.48\textwidth]{Images/ERMSE_5_7_09-eps-converted-to.pdf}\label{ERMSE_5_7_09}}
\caption{RMSE of the EnKF-FS and EnKF-RS implementations for different values of $0 \le C \le 10$ and $40 \le \Nens \le 80$ making use of the $QG_{33 \times 33}$ instance.}
\label{fig:RMSE-proposed-methods}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure}[H]
\centering
\subfloat[EnKF-FS, $p = 0.7$]{\includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth]{Images/ETIME_5_6_07-eps-converted-to.pdf}\label{ETIME_5_6_07}} %
\subfloat[EnKF-RS, $p = 0.7$]{\includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth]{Images/ETIME_5_7_07-eps-converted-to.pdf}\label{ETIME_5_7_07}}
\subfloat[EnKF-FS, $p = 0.9$]{\includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth]{Images/ETIME_5_6_09-eps-converted-to.pdf}\label{ETIME_5_6_09}} %
\subfloat[EnKF-RS, $p = 0.9$]{\includegraphics[width=0.48\textwidth]{Images/ETIME_5_7_09-eps-converted-to.pdf}\label{ETIME_5_7_09}}
\caption{Assimilation times of the EnKF-FS and EnKF-RS implementations for different values of $0 \le C \le 10$ and $40 \le \Nens \le 80$ making use of the $QG_{33 \times 33}$ instance}
\label{fig:TIME-proposed-methods}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure}[H]
\centering
\subfloat[EnKF-FS, $p = 0.7$]{\includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth]{Images/ERMSE2_5_6_07-eps-converted-to.pdf}\label{ERMSE2_5_6_07}} %
\subfloat[EnKF-RS, $p = 0.7$]{\includegraphics[width=0.48\textwidth]{Images/ERMSE2_5_7_07-eps-converted-to.pdf}\label{ERMSE2_5_7_07}}
\subfloat[EnKF-FS, $p = 0.9$]{\includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth]{Images/ERMSE2_5_6_09-eps-converted-to.pdf}\label{ERMSE2_5_6_09}} %
\subfloat[EnKF-RS, $p = 0.9$]{\includegraphics[width=0.48\textwidth]{Images/ERMSE2_5_7_09-eps-converted-to.pdf}\label{ERMSE2_5_7_09}}
\caption{RMSEs of the EnKF-FS and EnKF-RS implementations for different values of $10 \le C \le 60$ and $10 \le \Nens \le 30$ making use of the $QG_{33 \times 33}$ instance.}
\label{fig:RMSE2-proposed-methods}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure}[H]
\centering
\subfloat[EnKF-FS, $p = 0.7$]{\includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth]{Images/ETIME2_5_6_07-eps-converted-to.pdf}\label{ETIME2_5_6_07}} %
\subfloat[EnKF-RS, $p = 0.7$]{\includegraphics[width=0.48\textwidth]{Images/ETIME2_5_7_07-eps-converted-to.pdf}\label{ETIME2_5_7_07}}
\subfloat[EnKF-FS, $p = 0.9$]{\includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth]{Images/ETIME2_5_6_09-eps-converted-to.pdf}\label{ETIME2_5_6_09}} %
\subfloat[EnKF-RS, $p = 0.9$]{\includegraphics[width=0.48\textwidth]{Images/ETIME2_5_7_09-eps-converted-to.pdf}\label{ETIME2_5_7_09}}
\caption{Assimilation times of the EnKF-FS and EnKF-RS implementations for different values of $10 \le C \le 60$ and $10 \le \Nens \le 30$ making use of the $QG_{33 \times 33}$ instance.}
\label{fig:TIME2-proposed-methods}
\end{figure}
\section{Conclusions}
\label{sec:conclusions}
This paper develops two new implementations of the ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF) based on shrinkage covariance estimation. The background error covariance matrices used in analysis are obtained via the Rao-Blackwell Ledoit and Wolf estimator, which has been proved optimal in the estimation of high-dimensional covariance matrices from a small number of samples. This covariance matrix and the background state (ensemble mean) serve as parameters of the normal error distribution associated with the ensemble members. Samples from this distribution are taken in order to increase the number of ensemble members, and therefore, to decrease the sampling error in representing the background error distribution, and to increase the number of degrees of freedom in the assimilation. The two proposed implementations differ in the space where the assimilation process is performed: EnKF Full-Space (EnKF-FS) performs the analysis in the model space, while EnKF Reduce-Space (EnKF-RS) computes the analysis state in the space spanned by the ensemble members. Numerical experiments are carried out using a quasi-geostrophic model. They show that the two new implementations perform better than current EnKF implementations such as the traditional EnKF, square root filters, and inflation-free EnKF methods. For all the scenarios and experimental settings, the EnKF-FS outperforms the other implementations by at least $60\%$ in terms of accuracy (root mean square error). Moreover, for a small number of ensemble members ($\sim 10$) and a moderate percentage of observed components from the vector state ($\sim 70 \%$), the solutions obtained by the proposed methods are similar to those obtained by large ensemble sizes ($\sim 80$) and large percentage of observed components ($\sim 90\%$). The computational time for analysis of the proposed implementations is reasonably low. Since the total compute time is dominated by the multiple model runs considerable savings are expected from reducing the number of real ensemble members without deteriorating the quality of the results.
\section*{Acknowledgements}
\bibliographystyle{alpha}
|
\section[Introduction]{Introduction}
\label{intro}
AM Her, also known as polars, are a sub-class of magnetic Cataclysmic Variables (mCVs): binary systems, composed of a highly magnetised (B~$\sim 7-120$ MG) white dwarf (WD) primary star and a low-mass red dwarf secondary, in which mass is transferred from the secondary to the primary star by Roche lobe overflow. In contrast to non-magnetic CVs, in which the transferred mass spirals in an accretion disc towards the WD, in AM Her stars the accretion occurs through a magnetic accretion column along the magnetic field lines and the rotation of both stars are synchronised with the orbital period. Intermediate polars (IPs) constitute the other class of mCVs. They are not synchronised and may have an accretion disc that is internally truncated by the magnetic field of the WD. The optical and near-infrared radiation from polars is dominated by cyclotron emission and the X-ray radiation is dominated by bremsstrahlung, both from the accretion column near the WD, the post-shock region.
Cyclotron radiation is highly anisotropic and polarized. Therefore AM Her are the stellar sources with the largest fraction of polarized light in the sky, reaching 50 per cent in optical bands. See \citet{cropper1990} for a review on polars.
According to the standard model, the evolution of CVs is based on angular momentum loss that decreases the separation between the stars and, consequently, the orbital period. Thus, the systems evolve from longer to shorter periods. There are two known mechanisms to cause the angular momentum loss in CVs: the magnetic braking (MB - \citealt{verbunt1981}), which dominates in longer period systems and is driven by the outflowing magnetised stellar wind of the secondary; and the emission of gravitational waves (GW), which prevails in the shorter period systems. Most CVs have periods ranging from 1.2 to 6~h, but there is a deficiency in the number of systems with periods between 2 and 3~h, known as the period gap. The period gap is understood as the transition from the MB to the GW mechanisms, considering that the secondary is out of equilibrium in the MB phase due to the mass loss. When the MB halts, the secondary contracts to its equilibrium radius and detaches from the Roche lobe, interrupting the mass transfer and becoming too faint to be detected. The mass transfer is re-established when the GW mechanism shrinks the Roche Lobe back to contact with the secondary, at orbital periods around 2~h \citep[e.g.,][]{Howell2001,webbink2002}.
The period gap is not so conspicuous in polars as it is in non-magnetic CVs. The presence of a strong magnetic field in the primary could make the MB mechanism less efficient, which is attributed to the trapping of the stellar wind in the combined magnetosphere of both stars in synchronised systems \citep[and references therein]{webbink2002}. Therefore, evolution of polars is slow and the accretion rates are low in comparison with others CVs.
Another difference between polars and non-magnetic CVs is the scarcity of long-period AM Her systems. On the contrary, IPs are predominatly found above the period gap.
\citet{chanmugam1984} proposed that IPs evolve to polars as the orbital period decreases as result of standard CV evolution. A problem with this scenario is the different distributions of magnetic field intensities in polars and IPs. \citet{cumming2002} proposed that the WD magnetic field can be reduced by accretion, which could redeem that scenario. However, \citet{zhang2009} performed new calculations considering non-spherical accretion and concluded that the magnetic field is not easily modified by accretion. Presently it is not yet clear what is the evolutionary relation between mCVs \citep[and references therein]{norton2008,pretorius2013}.
The Catalina Real Time Transient Survey \citep[CRTS;][]{drake2009} improved the number of discoveries of faint transient objects. CRTS is composed by three separate surveys - the Catalina Schmidt Survey (CSS), the Mount Lemmon Survey (MLS) and the Siding Spring Survey (SSS) - that repeatedly scan a combined area of 30 000 deg$^2$ of the sky in both hemispheres, up to a limit of 19-21 mag in $V$ band. This survey has already found more than one thousand CV candidates, which are made public on their website\footnote{\url{http://crts.caltech.edu}}. MLS110213:022733+130617\ (hereafter MLS110213) is one of those candidates: it is a Galactic source that is highly variable, ranging from 16.5 mag to 19.5 mag in the CRTS light curve in timescales of days. We selected it, as a target for detailed observational follow-up, from a larger program of spectroscopic classification of mCV candidates (Oliveira et al., in preparation).
As of June 2014\footnote {update RKcat7.22, 2014, at \url{http://physics.open.ac.uk/RKcat/}}, 114 polars have been identified \citep[hereafter RK catalogue]{ritter2003,ritter2011}. Among them, 30 systems have periods above the period gap and only 5 of them are eclipsing, being MLS110213\ one of those systems. MLS110213\ is included in the RK catalogue based on reports in VSNET\footnote{VSNET, at \url{http://www.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp/vsnet/}. The vsnet-alerts 12847, 12855, 12884, 12888 are related to MLS110213.}. There are only two other known eclipsing polars having longer periods, namely V895 Cen \citep{1997AJ....113.2231H} and V1309 Ori \citep{2001A&A...374..588S}.
Here we report the results of the photometric, spectroscopic and polarimetric follow-up of MLS110213\ and the first modelling of the light and polarization curves.
In Section~2, we present the data. In Section~3, we show the analysis of the light curve, of the polarimetric data and of the spectra. The modelling of the light and polarization curves using the {\sc cyclops} code is presented in Section~4. The eclipse fitting is explained in Section~5. In Section~6 we estimate the distance to MLS110213. We discuss our results and present our conclusions in Section~7. Preliminary results were presented in \citet{silva2014}.
\section{Observations and data reduction}
Photometric and polarimetric observations of MLS110213\ were performed at the Observat\'orio Pico dos Dias (OPD - LNA/MCTI), located in southeast Brazil, using the 1.6-m Perkin-Elmer telescope, while the spectroscopic data were obtained on the SOAR Telescope, on Cerro Pachon, Chile. The journal of observations is presented in Table \ref{tabdados}. The data acquisition and reduction are described in the following sections.
\begin{table*}
\begin{center}
\caption{Log of observations of MLS110213.}
\label{tabdados}
\begin{tabular}{l c c c c c}
\hline
Date & Telescope & Instrument & Filter & Exp. time (s) & Duration (h) \\
\hline
2011 August 14 & 1.6 m P-E & Cam1+IkonL & $I_C$ & 60 & 2.7 \\
2011 September 22 & 1.6 m P-E & Polarimeter + IkonL + $\lambda$/4 & $R_C$ & 90 & 5.0 \\
2011 October 27 & 1.6 m P-E & Cam1+IkonL & $R_C$ & 100 & 5.1 \\
2011 October 28 & 1.6 m P-E & Cam1+IkonL & $R_C$ & 60 & 2.5 \\
2012 August 13 & 1.6 m P-E & Cam1+IkonL & $I_C$ & 60 & 3.3 \\
2012 September 10 & 4.1 m SOAR & Goodman HTS & - & 1200 & 1.0 \\
2013 August 23 & 1.6 m P-E & Cam1+IkonL & Clear & 10 & 1.5 \\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\end{center}
\end{table*}
\subsection{Photometry}
Photometric data in $R_C$, ${I_C}$ and white light (clear) bands were obtained employing a thin, back-illuminated 2048$\times$2048 E2V CCD 42-40 mounted in an IkonL camera.
The exposure times were scaled according to the atmospheric conditions, and acurate timings were provided by a GPS receiver. Bias and dome flat-field exposures were used for correction of the detector read-out noise and sensitivity using \textsc{iraf}\footnote {\textsc{iraf} is distributed by the National Optical Astronomy Observatories, which are operated by the Association of Universities for
Research in Astronomy, Inc., under cooperative agreement with the National Science Foundation.} standard routines. The differential aperture photometry was performed with the \textsc{daophot~ii} package, adopting as reference the star USNO~B1.0~31$-$0032240 (${\rm R}$~=~15.38~mag; ${\rm I}$~=~15.23~mag). The conversion between ${R}$ and Landolt's ${R_C}$ for this object indicates a difference of only 0.03 mag \citep{kidger2003}. The resulting light curves in ${R_C}$, ${I_C}$ and white light are shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:lc1}.
\begin{figure
\centering
\includegraphics[trim= 3.3cm 1cm 2cm 1cm, clip,width=0.58\textwidth]{./fig1.ps}
\caption{
OPD light curves of MLS110213\, folded with the ephemeris estimated in Section \ref{curvas}. From top to bottom: ${R_C}$ band, ${I_C}$ band and white light. White light magnitudes are not calibrated.}
\label{fig:lc1}
\end{figure}
\subsection{Polarimetry}
We obtained ${R_C}$ polarimetric data using a CCD camera modified by the polarimetric module, as described in \citet{magalhaes1996}. The data reduction followed the standard procedures using {\sc iraf}. The polarization was calculated according to \citet{magalhaes1984} and \citet{rodrigues1998} using the package {\sc pccdpack} \citep{pereyra2000} and a set of IRAF routines developed by our group\footnote{\url{http://www.das.inpe.br/~claudia.rodrigues/polarimetria/reducao_pol.html}}. Each set of 8 images is used to produce one measurement of linear and circular polarizations. We grouped the images in the following way: 1-8, 2-9, 3-10, and so on. Hence the polarization points are not independent measurements. The polarization position angle correction to the equatorial reference system was performed using standard polarized stars. The polarization of the non-polarized standards is consistent with zero, therefore no instrumental polarization correction was applied. We could not determine the correct sign of the circular polarization - if positive or negative. But we could detect changes in this signal. The linear polarization is always a positive value, which introduces a bias into any measurement: the measured polarization value is greater than the true polarization value \citep{simmons1985}. In particular, measurements having $P/\sigma_{P} < 1.4$ provides only upper limits to the real polarization value. The polarization of MLS110213\ was bias-corrected following \citet{vaillancourt2006}. Figure \ref{pol_p} shows the resulting polarization curves for MLS110213, binned in 40 orbital phases. The lack of points around phase 0 corresponds to the eclipse in which we had no signal to measure the polarization.
The ordinary and extraordinary counts of the polarimetric data were summed to obtain the total counts of each object. Hence the polarimetric data allowed us to perform differential photometry and to obtain an additional MLS110213\ light curve, which is also plotted in Fig.~\ref{fig:lc1}.
\begin{figure
\centering
\includegraphics[trim= 3.1cm 1cm 2cm 1.6cm, clip,width=0.57\textwidth]{./fig2.ps}
\caption{Polarimetry of MLS110213\ in ${R_C}$ band. The data points were grouped in 40 orbital phase bins. The lack of points around phase 0 corresponds to the eclipse in which we had no signal to measure the polarization. From top to bottom, the panels show the circular polarization, linear polarization, and position angle of the linear polarization. The triangles are points with no errors estimation.}
\label{pol_p}
\end{figure}
\subsection{Spectroscopy}
Spectra of MLS110213\ were obtained in queue mode on September 10, 2012 using the SOAR Telescope, Chile, with the Goodman High Throughput Spectrograph \citep{2004SPIE.5492..331C} and a Fairchild 4096$\times$4096 CCD with 15 micron/pixel. The spectrograph was set to operate with 600 l/mm VPH grating, 1.68 arcsec slit and the GG~385 blocking filter, yielding a spectral resolution of 7~\r{A} FWHM in the range from 4350 to 7005 \r{A}. Three 1200~s exposures were obtained, reaching individual S/N ratio of 45 at the continuum. Quartz lamps calibration flats and bias images were taken to correct the CCD signature, while CuHeAr lamp exposures were used for wavelength calibration, which resulted in typical 0.8 \r{A} or about 45 km s$^{-1}$ calibration RMS residuals. The [\mbox{O\,{\sc i}}] 5577 \r{A} telluric spectral line was used to assess the calibration accuracy. Two spectra of the HR~1544 spectrophotometric standard \citep{Hamuy1992} were used for flux calibration. The data reduction, spectra extraction and calibrations were performed with IRAF standard routines. The average spectrum of MLS110213~ is presented in Fig.~\ref{fig:spec}.
\begin{figure
\centering
\includegraphics[clip,width=0.48\textwidth]{./fig3.eps}
\caption{Average spectrum of MLS110213.}
\label{fig:spec}
\end{figure}
\section{Results}
\subsection{Light curves and ephemeris}
\label{curvas}
We analysed the photometric ${I_C}$, ${R_C}$ and white light data obtained at OPD as well as the $V$ data available from CRTS. This later dataset consists of 513 data points from the CSS and MLS surveys, spanning 8.3 years with a typical cadence of 4 consecutive exposures every visit, which are typically separated by 2-30 days. CRTS data points have magnitudes in the range from 16.5 to 19.5 mag and are shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:lc3}.
MLS110213\ light curves obtained at OPD have higher temporal resolution than CRTS data and clearly show eclipses, whose amplitude reaches $\sim$3 mag. We determined the timings of the six OPD eclipses as the midpoints of the bottom-of-eclipse light curves, the uncertainty being half of the exposure plus readout times (Table~\ref{tabephe}). Our measurements were converted to BJD(TDB) using the online code developed by \citet{eastman2010}. These timings were used to a first estimate of MLS110213\ ephemeris. We then used the CRTS data to visually refine the ephemeris. The resulting ephemeris is
\begin{equation}
T_{\rm ecl} = (BJD) 2\,455\,862.6002\;(\pm3) + 0.15779878(\pm6) \ \times E.\
\label{eq-ephem}
\end{equation}
Errors of T$_0$ and of the period are given in brackets. Fig.~\ref{fig:lc2} shows the OPD white light, ${I_C}$ and ${R_C}$ light curves as well as CRTS data, folded with the period and epoch given in the above ephemeris. Despite the poor temporal resolution and the noise, long-spanning CRTS data are very well described by the ephemeris, with the eclipses clearly visible both in the high and low states (see below) with correct phasing. The eclipse has a flat bottom, with a duration of about 15 min. Its ingress is steep and lasts less than 2 min, while the egress is less sharp. The shape of the eclipse is consistent with the eclipsed object being the WD and/or a post-shock region.
By inspecting the CRTS light curve we note that it can be divided in two distinct brightness levels (high and low) separated by about 1.5~mag, as can be seen in Fig.~\ref{fig:lc3} (top and middle).
Following \citet{wu2008}, we used a histogram of the magnitudes to choose the limit magnitude between high and low states. Figure ~\ref{fig:lc3} (bottom) shows a clear minimum at 17.85~mag, which we adopted as this limit. However, since MLS110213~ is an eclipsing system, the classification of a point as low or high can be tricky.
We performed the classification of datasets of consecutive points (a visit) as described below. The vast majority of the visits spans more than 15 min, which is the eclipses length. Therefore most visits have at least one point out of the eclipse, and that point was used to estimate the brightness state of the corresponding dataset: if at least one point of a visit was brighter than 17.85~mag, then we considered this dataset as belonging to the high state. On the other hand, datasets with out-of-eclipse points fainter than 17.85~mag were classified as in the low state. But some CRTS visits are difficult to classify as high or low state because they include out-of-eclipse points consistent with both states. We tried to use a different limiting magnitude, but it did not help. Some of these points are seen around orbital phases 0.3 and 0.8 in Fig.~\ref{fig:lc3} (middle). A possible explanation is the presence of clouds during CRTS observations.
Fig.~\ref{fig:lc3} (top) shows MLS110213\ light curve in HJD. There is no typical duration of the high or low states, being the transition between states fast, lasting about a day, which is a common behaviour among polars. According to this classification in distinct brightness levels, all of our OPD photometric data seem to correspond to the high state, except for $I_c$ band from August 14, 2011.
The out-of-eclipse light curves show orbital variation in all bands, but it seems to depend on the brightness state (Figs.~\ref{fig:lc1} and \ref{fig:lc3}). The CRTS data in low state have a modulation of around 1~mag with a minimum around 0.5 orbital phase. The phase dispersion is around 0.5~mag. In high state, the light curve has a larger dispersion, of about 1~mag, and no orbital modulation is observed. Moreover, possible departure from the high state may also be present in OPD data, as can be seen in the ${I_C}$ light curves in Fig.~\ref{fig:lc1}, which were obtained one year apart. We did a careful analysis of objects in the field, and we discarded variation in the comparison star. Flickering with average 0.02~mag amplitude and time-scales of few minutes is also visible in the out-of-eclipse OPD light curves.
\begin{table}
\begin{center}
\caption{Mid-eclipse timings of MLS110213
}
\label{tabephe}
\begin{tabular}{c c }
\hline
E & T$_{min}$ \\
(cycles) & (BJD(TDB) 2450000+) \\
\hline
$-$468 & 5788.750530($\pm$72) \\
$-$221 & 5827.726780($\pm$129) \\
0 & 5862.600061($\pm$118) \\
7 & 5863.704851($\pm$73)\\
1845 & 6153.738822($\pm$75) \\
4222 & 6528.826641($\pm$16) \\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\end{center}
\end{table}
\begin{figure
\centering
\includegraphics[trim= 2.1cm 0.8cm 1.5cm 1.5cm, clip,width=0.5\textwidth]{./fig4a.ps}
\includegraphics[trim= 2.1cm 0.8cm 1.5cm 1.5cm, clip,width=0.5\textwidth]{./fig4b.ps}
\includegraphics[trim= 0.65cm 1.8cm 0.3cm 2.6cm, clip,width=0.5\textwidth]{./fig4c.ps}
\caption{Top panel: V band light curves of MLS110213\ showing the high (open circles) and low (filled circles) brightness states along 8.3 years of CRTS observations. Middle panel: The same data as in the top panel, folded using our ephemeris. Bottom panel: Histogram of the magnitudes of MLS110213\ using a bin size of 0.1 mag.
}
\label{fig:lc3}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure
\centering
\includegraphics[trim= 3.5cm 1cm 2.0cm 1.75cm, clip,width=0.58\textwidth]{./fig5.ps}
\caption{Light curves of MLS110213\, folded with the ephemeris estimated in Section \ref{curvas}. Light curves expanded in the phase interval 0.9-1.1 to detail the eclipse shape. From top to bottom: OPD ${R_C}$ band, OPD ${I_C}$ band, OPD white light, CRTS high state $V$ band and CRTS low state $V$ band. White light magnitudes are not calibrated. The blue dot-dashed line in the white light data (middle panel) is the result of the eclipse fitting discussed in Section~\ref{eclip}.}
\label{fig:lc2}
\end{figure}
\subsection{Polarization}
\label{sec_pol}
The polarimetric light curve (Fig.~\ref{pol_p}) confirms MLS110213\ classification as a polar, since it shows variable polarized emission. These data were probably obtained while it was in the high brightness state because the CRTS data collected near our polarimetric observations are also in high state.
The system presents circular polarization varying in the range $-13$ to 4 per cent in ${R_C}$ band. The circular polarization does not have a standstill at zero, which indicates that a cyclotron component is always contributing to the observed flux in the high state. There are inversions of the polarization sign around phases 0.5 and 0.8. This phenomenon indicates either one emitting region always visible, but observed from the backside in some phases, or two accretion regions. The polarization has its maximum absolute value around phase 0.0, which corresponds approximately to the phase of maximum flux in the out-of eclipse low state light curve. It could be interpreted as if the low state modulation is also mainly due to cyclotron emission from the accretion column. Moreover, both in high and low states, the flux modulation is neither consistent with ellipsoidal variation nor with a heated secondary surface.
The linear polarization is small, below 5 per cent, and variable. Its maximum values occurs at phases $0.4$ and $0.75$, which are near the phases when circular polarization changes sign: this is consistent with the direction of the emitting region changing from forward to backward. However, our data do not have a good SNR, and these conclusions should be taken with caution.
\subsection{Spectroscopy}
The average spectrum of MLS110213~ is typical of polars (Fig.~\ref{fig:spec}). It is dominated by the Balmer and \mbox{He\,{\sc ii}} 4686 \r{A} emission features, and also presents several lines of \mbox{He\,{\sc i}} and the Bowen \mbox{C\,{\sc iii}}/\mbox{N\,{\sc iii}} complex at 4630-4660 \r{A}. Emission lines of \mbox{Fe\,{\sc ii}} 5169 \r{A} and \mbox{Si\,{\sc ii}} 6347, 6371 \r{A} are also visible. The continuum is flat with a very slight blue slope and the Balmer lines have inverted decrement which, together with the intense \mbox{He\,{\sc ii}} 4686 \r{A} line, are characteristic of high-ionized optically-thick emission regions. Identification, equivalent width and FWHM of the main emission features in the average spectrum are presented in Table~\ref{tablines}.
The spectrum shows no sign of stellar features. Comparing the flux level to the CRTS data, we see that our spectra of MLS110213~ were probably obtained in high brightness state. In addition, the absence of cyclotron humps and of secondary features in the spectra is consistent with the system being in a high accretion state, since these features may be diluted by the strong accretion radiation.
Our spectra do not cover a complete orbital cycle. In the analysis of each of the three individual spectra
(Fig.~\ref{3specteste}), the \mbox{He\,{\sc ii}} 4686 \r{A} and Balmer lines have profiles changing from symmetric, at the first spectrum, to profiles with extended red wings in the third spectrum, taken 40 min later. We calculated the radial velocities of the \mbox{C\,{\sc iii}}/\mbox{N\,{\sc iii}} complex, \mbox{He\,{\sc ii}} 4686 \r{A} and Balmer lines, as a function of the orbital ephemeris, by fitting a gaussian function to the peak of the lines (Table~\ref{tabvr}). The lower limit to the RV amplitude is 300~km~s$^{-1}$.
As these velocities were measured at the line peaks, they should map the velocities of the narrow component seen in polars, probably associated with the mass flux close to the donor star
\begin{figure
\centering
\includegraphics[clip,width=0.48\textwidth]{./fig6.eps}
\caption{Individual spectra of MLS110213~obtained at orbital phases 0.66, 0.75 and 0.84 (from bottom to top, respectively). The spectra were shifted in the vertical axis for clarity, maintaining relative flux ratios. }
\label{3specteste}
\end{figure}
\begin{table}
\begin{center}
\caption{Identification, EW and FWHM of emission features in the average spectrum of MLS110213. The FWHM measurements were obtained from Voigt profile fitting.}
\label{tablines}
\begin{tabular}{lcc}
\hline
Identif. & $-$EW (\r{A}) & FWHM (km s$^{-1}$) \\
\hline
\mbox{He\,{\sc i}} 4388 \r{A} & 4 & 750 \\
\mbox{He\,{\sc i}} 4471 \r{A} & 16 & 1070 \\
\mbox{C\,{\sc iii}}/\mbox{N\,{\sc iii}} 4640 \r{A} & 14 & 1100 \\
\mbox{He\,{\sc ii}} 4686 \r{A} & 49 & 640 \\
H$\beta$ & 70 & 680 \\
\mbox{He\,{\sc i}} 4922 \r{A} & 9 & 550 \\
\mbox{He\,{\sc i}} 5016 \r{A} & 13 & 600 \\
\mbox{He\,{\sc ii}} 5412 \r{A} & 10 & 610 \\
\mbox{He\,{\sc i}} 5876 \r{A} & 21 & 560 \\
H$\alpha$ & 80 & 590 \\
\mbox{He\,{\sc i}} 6678 \r{A} & 12 & 540 \\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\end{center}
\end{table}
\begin{table}
\begin{center}
\caption{Radial velocities of selected lines, in km s$^{-1}$.}
\label{tabvr}
\begin{tabular}{l c c c c }
\hline
phase & \mbox{C\,{\sc iii}}/\mbox{N\,{\sc iii}} 4640 \r{A} & \mbox{He\,{\sc ii}} 4686 \r{A} &H$_{\beta}$& $H_{\alpha}$ \\
\hline
0.66 & $-$124 & $-$106 & $-$129 & $-$127 \\
0.75 & 25 & 19 & $-$12 & $-$30 \\
0.84 & 186 & 169 & 156 & 98 \\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\end{center}
\end{table}
\section{Cyclotron Models}
We performed a modelling of the cyclotron emission of MLS110213\ . {\sc Cyclops} code was used to fit the available photometric and polarimetric data and to estimate some geometrical and physical properties of the system. {\sc cyclops} is a radiative transfer code that calculates the cyclotron and bremsstrahlung emission from a 3D post-shock region. The accretion geometry is defined by a bipolar magnetic field, $B_{pole}$, centred in the WD. The plasma temperature ($T$) and density ($N_e$) structures are defined by shock-like profiles in the radial direction and by an exponential decay or a constant profile in the tangential direction. The shock-like profiles are analytical functions having a shape similar to the magnetised 1D shock solution of \citet{cropper1990} and \citet{saxton2007}. Their parameters are the maximum temperature, the maximum density, and the height of the post-shock region. These functions are presented in equations (1) and (2) of \citet{silva2013}.
Eleven parameters define a model, as listed in the upper part of Table~\ref{tab_cyclops}. The parameters define the geometrical and physical properties of the the post-shock region, which is divided into voxels. The spatial resolution of a model is a free parameter, which defines the voxel size. The emissivities of the four Stokes parameters are calculated according to the $B$, $T$, and $N_e$ of each voxel, and after that, the radiative transfer is calculated, from the bottom to the top of the region, according with the line of sight. The result is an image in each orbital phase for each Stokes parameter. These values are integrated in area to obtain the flux and polarization as a function of the orbital phase. The figure-of-merit to quantify the fitting quality is the $\chi^2$. The genetic algorithm {\sc pikaia} \citep{charbonneau1995} is used to identify the regions in the parameter space having the best models, and then an amoeba based code refines the search. The model can fit several optical bands simultaneously. For a detailed description of the code, see \citet{costa2009} and \citet{silva2013}.
We fitted the high state data of MLS110213~comprising $V$ light curve from CRTS, R$_c$ light and polarization curves from OPD and I$_c$ light curve obtained 2012 August 13, also from OPD (Fig.~\ref{fig_cyclops}). Magnitudes and polarizations were converted into total and polarized fluxes. The data in each band were binned in 40 phase intervals. Although the data are not simultaneous, we consider that the brightness states are similar. The large error bars of the $V$ light curve are probably the result of a combination of measurements taken in slightly different brightness states. Photometric measurements obtained near eclipse, between phases 0.95 and 0.1, were analysed separately (see Section \ref{eclip}), as {\sc cyclops} does not handle the eclipse of the post-shock region by the secondary.
In our minimisation procedure, we keep free all parameters listed in Table 5 except for the inclination, which was limited between 75 and 90 deg due to the presence of total eclipse. In the modelling, we used the following frequencies to represent each optical band: $V$ = 5.45$\times 10^{14}$~Hz, $R_C$ = 4.49$\times10^{14}$~Hz and $I_C$ = 3.8$\times10^{14}$~Hz. The results of our modelling are presented in the next section.
\subsection{Modelling discussion}
\label{sec_model_discussion}
As already discussed in Section~\ref{sec_pol}, the inversion of the polarization sign may be observed in two situations: (i) two emitting regions; (ii) one emitting region whose magnetic field lines alternate direction back and forth along the orbital cycle. As we found a reasonable fit using only one region, we adopted this solution, therefore minimising the number of free parameters of the model.
Using {\sc pikaia} with distinct parameters intervals, the best fits were always found in a same group of models. The fits considering layers with constant values of $N_e$ and $T$ are worse than those in which these quantities are let to vary in the direction perpendicular to the column height. The model having the smallest $\chi^2$ is shown in Fig.~\ref{fig_cyclops} and its parameters are presented in Table~\ref{tab_cyclops}. We discuss this model below.
\begin{figure*
\centering
\includegraphics[trim=3.0cm 1cm 4cm 1.1cm, clip,width=0.50\textwidth]{./fig7a.ps}
\includegraphics[trim=3.5cm 1cm 4cm 1cm, clip,width=0.48\textwidth]{./fig7b.ps}
\caption{MLS110213~ data (points and triangles- the last with no erros estimates) and the best-fit model (lines) described in text and whose parameters are presented in Table~\ref{tab_cyclops}. Left panel: Polarization modelling. From top to bottom, the panels show circular polarized flux ($F_V$), linear polarized flux ($F_P$) and angle of linear polarization ($\theta$). The black dots are the $R_C$ polarization data and the black solid line represents the best $R_C$ model. The blue dotted line is the $V$ band model prediction and the red dashed line represents the model prediction in $I_C$ band. Right panel: Total flux modelling ($F_T$). From top to bottom, the panels shows the light curves in $V$, ${R_C}$ and ${I_C}$ bands. The black lines are the best models. }
\label{fig_cyclops}
\end{figure*}
\begin{table}
\caption{Physical and geometrical properties estimated for MLS110213.}
\label{tab_cyclops}
\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{ll}
\hline
Cyclops input parameters & Fitted values \\
\hline
$i$ & 77$\degr$ \\
$\beta$ & 39$\degr$ \\
$\Delta_{long}$ & 87$\degr$ \\
$\Delta_R$ & 0.29 \\
$h$ & 0.18 $R_{WD}$ \\
$f_l$ & 0.29 \\
$B_{pole}$ & 35 MG \\
$B_{lat}$ & 65$\degr$ \\
$B_{long}$ & 49$\degr$ \\
$T_{max}$ & 29 keV \\
$N_{e~max}$ & 14.3 cm$^{-3}$ \\
\hline
Model results & Values \\
\hline
$B_{reg}$ & 18 -- 33 MG\\
$\langle T \rangle$ & 9 keV \\
$T_{pond}$ & 5 keV \\
$T_{range}$ & 1-29 keV \\
$\delta_{phase}$ & $-0.11$ \\
$\chi^2$ & 0.395 \\
\hline
Stellar parameters & Values \\
\hline
$q$ & 0.42 \\
M$_1$ & 0.67 M$_{\odot}$ \\
R$_1$ & 0.012 R$_{\odot}$ \\
M$_2$ & 0.28 M$_{\odot}$ \\
R$_2$ & 0.36 R$_{\odot}$ \\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\end{center}
Parameters description - $i$: orbital inclination; $\beta$: colatitude of the reference point of the coordinate system inside the emitting region; $\Delta_{long}$: one-half of the azimuth of the threading region; $\Delta_R$: one-half of the radial extension of the threading region; $h$: height of the post-shock region; $f_l$: position in the longitudinal direction of the threading point relative to the geometrical centre of the threading region; $B_{pole}$: polar magnetic field intensity; $B_{lat}$: latitude of the magnetic axis; $B_{long}$: longitude of the magnetic axis; $T_{max}$: maximum electronic temperature; $N_{e~max}$: log of maximum electronic density; $B_{reg}$: magnetic field in the post-shock region; $\langle T \rangle$: mean eletronic temperature; $T_{pond}$: mean temperature weighted by the square density ($\sum(T_{vox} \ N_{vox}^{2})/ \sum N_{vox}^{2}$; $T_{range}$: range of temperatures of in the post-shock region; $\delta_{phase}$: phase shift applied to the model.
\end{table}
The model reproduces quite well the $R_C$ circular polarization (Fig.~\ref{fig_cyclops}, left/top panel, black lines). In particular, the observed sign inversion is well fit. The observed linear polarization flux is small and noisy, but larger than that produced by the model.
The flux modulation in $V$, $R_C$, and $I_C$ bands are reasonable well fit (Fig.~\ref{fig_cyclops}, right panel). Figure ~\ref{fig_cyclops} also presents the polarization predictions to $V$ and $R_C$ bands (blue dotted and red dashed line, respectively). The predicted circular polarization in $V$ band is similar in shape, but has a larger amplitude than $R_C$ band, and the sign inversion is more pronounced. $I_c$ band model prediction shows null circular polarization from phase 0.5 to 1.1.
Figure \ref{st_seed_multi} is a geometrical cartoon of our modelling of the emitting region on the WD surface along the orbital cycle. From phase 0.7-0.1 the emitting region is visualised from the top, when the circular polarization is negative and larger. From 0.2 to 0.6 the region is partially occulted and is seen from the opposite direction, hence the circular polarization is positive and smaller. The sign inversions can be associated with the following configurations: the first sign inversion occurs around phase 0.5, when the region is seen completely by the opposite side for the first time; the second inversion occurs around phase 0.8, when the entire region starts to point to the observer again. Therefore, we can conclude that the circular polarization sign inversion can be due the changes in the angle of view of one dominant emitting region. The change in the signal does not happen early in phases 0.2 or 0.3 because of the partial self-eclipse. The self-eclipse could also decrease the value of the absolute circular polarization flux.
The best fit model corresponds to an extended region, with a relatively high magnetic latitude and moderate electronic temperature. Orbital inclination from 75$\degr$ to 81$\degr$ produces very similar $\chi^2$ values: inclinations out of the range 74$\degr$ -- 85$\degr$ increase $\chi^2$ by at least 30\%. The best-fit magnetic field in the magnetic pole, $B_{pole}$, is 35~MG. This corresponds to a magnetic field in the region varying from 18 to 33~MG. Values of $B_{pole}$ between 34 and 36~MG produce very similar $\chi^2$ values, while $B_{pole}$ of 30 and 40~MG produce $\chi^2$ 30\% larger. The region mean temperature is 9~keV. The mean temperature weighted with the square density, $T_{pond}$, is around 5~keV.
For the temperature and density we found that the ranges 24 -- 30 K and 14 -- 14.3 $cm^{-3}$ provide small changes in the $\chi^2$. Out of the limits of 22 -- 35 K and 13.8 -- 14.6 $cm^{-3}$, the $\chi^2$ value increases by at least 30\%.
These are low values of temperature for a polar post-shock region and indicate a dominance of soft emission in X-ray. The maximum temperature in the emitting region, T$_{max}$, corresponds to the temperature in the shock front. Using the approach of \citet{1997ApJ...474..774F} and the \citet{nauenberg1972} mass-radius relation, we estimated a mass of 0.67~M$_\odot$ for the WD from T$_{max}$. The orbital period of MLS110213~ translates to a secondary mass, M$_2$, of 0.279~M$_\odot$ \citep{knigge2011}, resulting in a mass ratio, q, of 0.42. The stellar parameters are also summarised in Table 5.
The presented modelling of the accretion column can be refined using new additional data, for instance, observations in other broad bands, simultaneous data acquisition and/or spectropolarimetry is desirable.
\begin{figure
\centering
\includegraphics[trim= 4.4cm 16cm 2cm 4cm,clip,width=0.48\textwidth]{./fig8.ps}
\caption{Geometrical representation of the emitting region on the WD surface in MLS110213. The post-shock region is represented by its walls (blue lines). The curved red line near the centre of the emitting region is a magnetic field line threading the emitting region. It is shown to represent the accretion column geometry. The radial green line is the magnetic axis.} \label{st_seed_multi}
\end{figure}
\section{Eclipse fitting}
\label{eclip}
We fitted the eclipse profile seen in the clear band observations considering a simple model of two spherical stars in a circular orbit. The clear data present the best temporal resolution covering the eclipse. The eclipse is box shaped indicating a total eclipse of a very small object.
We determined M$_2$=0.279 M$_{\odot}$ and R$_2$= 0.37 R$_{\odot}$ by interpolating the semi-empirical CV donor star sequence \citep{knigge2011} as a function of the orbital period of the system. The flux of the donor star is considered negligible and M$_{1}$ is obtained from the mass ratio, $q$ = M$_{2}$/M$_{1}$. We use the masses to determine the distance between the stars from the Kepler Third Law and use \citet{nauenberg1972} relationship to determine R$_{1}$ from a given M$_{1}$. Thus the parameters of the eclipse fitting are the orbital inclination $i$ and the mass ratio $q$.
There is a degeneracy in the possible values of $i$ and $q$ that can fit the eclipse profile. M$_{1}$ will reach the limit of 1.4 M$_{\odot}$ at $q$ = 0.20 and $i$ = 79$\degr$. We can increase $q$ while decreasing $i$ until it reaches the minimum inclination limit for a total eclipse at $i$ = 73$\degr$ and $q$ = 0.75. Therefore, the observed eclipse width can be reproduced using the following intervals of parameters: M$_1$ = 0.37 -- 1.4 M$_{\odot}$, with $q$ = 0.75 -- 0.20 and $i$ = 73$\degr$ -- 79$\degr$.
The {\sc cyclops} modelling shows no significant variation in the fitting for the interval $i$ = 75$\degr$ -- 81$\degr$, indicating that the {\sc cyclops} geometry can also describe the observed eclipse profile. The blue dot-dashed line in the middle panel of Figure \ref{fig:lc2} shows the eclipse fitting using $q$ = 0.42, as estimated in the previous section. This value corresponds to M$_1$= 0.67 M$_{\odot}$ and R$_1$ = 0.012 R$_{\odot}$, keeping M$_2$ constant. The inclination that fits the eclipse profile is $i$ = 75.8$\degr$, in agreement with {\sc cyclops} estimated interval.
In polars, the emitting region can be much brighter than the WD itself, therefore determining the eclipse profile. The MLS110213\ eclipsed region is much smaller than the secondary star, as shown by the fast ingress and egress of the total eclipse. But the data do not have enough time resolution to allow the determination of the size of the eclipsed region.
We consider that the approximation of a spherical secondary star is valid because, at conjunction, the projected area of the secondary star on the plane of sky is minimum. To check this assumption, we compare our results with those of \citet{chanan1976}, who consider the actual geometry of a Roche-lobe-filling companion and a pointlike eclipsed object. We measured the half-eclipse width of MLS110213\ as 9.36$\degr$. Accordingly with Table 1 of \citet{chanan1976}, the mass ratio of q=0.42 results in an inclination of $i$ = 76.7$\degr$, in agreement with our result. Moreover, \citet{andronov2014} compare the use of a spherical approximation and an elliptical projection onto the celestial sphere for a secondary that fills its Roche lobe and found that, in the spherical approximation, the inclination is underestimated by about 2$\degr$, a value which is inside our uncertainties.
\section{Distance estimation}
\label{dist}
In order to estimate the distance to MLS110213, we adopted the Period-Luminosity-Colours (PLCs) method derived by \citet{ozdonmez2015}
The method uses the orbital period of the system together with J, K$_s$ and W1 magnitudes, from 2MASS \citep{skrutskie2006} and WISE \citep{wright2010}, to estimate absolute magnitudes of CVs. The method is based on the \citet{1976MNRAS.174..489B} relation which states that, for late-type main sequence stars, the surface brightness is nearly constant in the near-infrared. The PLCs relation is calibrated by the trigonometric parallaxes of 25 CVs. The accuracy in M$_J$ provided by the PLCs method is $\pm0.29$ mag. As the PLCs method does not consider other sources of infrared light except the secondary star, it yields a lower limit to the distance. The PLCs relation is:
\begin{equation}
M_J = 5.966~-~4.781 \log P~+~5.037 (J-K_S)_0~+~0.617 (K_S-W1)_0
\label{eq_plc}
\end{equation}
\noindent where $P$ is the orbital period given in hours and the de-reddened colours $(J-K_S)_0$ and $(K_S-W1)_0$ are calculated from $J_0~=~J~-~A_J$, $K_{S0} = K_S-A_{K_S}$ and $W1_0=W1-A_{W1}$.
We adopted $A_J=0.887 \times E(B-V)$, $A_{K_S}=0.382 \times E(B-V)$ and $A_{W1}=0.158 \times E(B-V)$ \citep{ozdonmez2015}.
The infrared magnitudes of MLS110213, obtained from the 2MASS and WISE database, are $J=15.928$, $H=15.264$, ${K_S}~=~15.000$, $W1=14.680$ and $W2=14.163$. The colour excess in the direction of MLS110213, obtained from \citet{2011ApJ...737..103S} maps, is $E(B-V)={0.0941}$. With those values and considering the accuracy in M$_J$, we estimate a distance to MLS110213\ of $406\pm54$ pc, assuming that the secondary is the only infrared light source in the system. Despite being a lower limit, this distance should not be very different from the true value, since our {\sc cyclops} modelling indicates that the cyclotron contribution to the total infrared flux of the binary system is small. This may not be the case for other magnetic CVs. In non-magnetic CVs, the infrared flux may have contributions from other structures like the outer regions of the accretion disc.
\section{Discussion and conclusions}
We have obtained photometric, polarimetric and spectroscopic data of MLS110213, which is one of the polar candidates identified and monitored by the Catalina Real Time Transient Survey. We confirm the system as a new eclipsing polar.
The optical spectrum, obtained in the 0.7 - 0.88 phase interval, is very similar to the spectra of other polars. It shows a flat continuum and an inverse Balmer decrement, and also conspicuous features of highly ionized optically thick regions, like strong emission lines of \mbox{He\,{\sc ii}} 4686 \r{A} and \mbox{C\,{\sc iii}}/\mbox{N\,{\sc iii}} 4640 \r{A}. There is no clear evidence of the secondary star in our spectrum.
Photometric data obtained at CRTS and OPD show that MLS110213~ presents deep (3 mag) eclipses with flat bottoms, indicating that the system has high orbital inclination. From OPD mid-eclipse timings we estimated an orbital period of 3.787~h, which places MLS110213~ as the $5^{th}$ eclipsing polar found above the orbital period gap.
The long term observations obtained by CRTS clearly show the system in two distinct brightness states, separated by 1.5 mag. In the high brightness state the out-of-eclipse light curve is almost flat, while in low state a strong modulation is observed, with a maximum at phase 0.175. The presence of distinct brightness states is typical of polars and are understood as variations at the mass accretion rate.
MLS110213~ presents circular polarization in the $R_c$ band (obtained in high state) varying from -13 to 4 per cent with a maximum around phases 0 - 0.125, consistent with cyclotron emission from the accretion column. The polarization does not have a standstill at zero, and there are phases when the signal changes, which may indicate either one emitting region always visible, but observed from the backside in some phases, or two accretion regions.
The {\sc cyclops} modelling of high state V, $R_c$ and $I_c$ light curves and of one $R_c$ polarimetric curve provided an estimate of the system parameters and a description of the main observed features, including the eclipse profile. The model agrees with the interpretation that MLS110213~ has one main circumpolar emitting region, although the possibility that it could be a two-pole accretor cannot yet be ruled out. This model constrains the magnetic field from 30 to 40 MG and the orbital inclination from 75$\degr$ to 85$\degr$. The eclipse fitting corroborates {\sc cyclops} results. Nevertheless, additional polarimetric data in V and $I_c$ band are necessary to a better determination of the system parameters.
The field of MLS110213\ was observed by ROSAT, RXTE, Integral and Swift observatories, but the source was not detected by none of them.
Using data from the JEM-X camera at Integral, we estimated an upper limit of 1.3$ \times 10^{-10}$~erg~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$ for the X-ray flux in the energy range of 2--5~keV. This flux is quite high, and we consider that the Integral non-detection is due to a short integration time. The ROSAT Bright Survey detection limit flux is 2$\times10^{-12}$~erg~cm$^{-2}$~s$^{-1}$ in the 0.12--2.48~keV band, considering a typical model for X-ray polars emission \citep{pretorius2013}. Adopting this flux limit and the distance estimate of $406$~pc, the X-ray luminosity of MLS110213~ is lower than 3.9$\times 10^{-31}$~erg~s$^{-1}$. All ROSAT polars with X-ray luminosities similar or smaller than this value are nearer systems \citep{pretorius2013}. Therefore the low X-ray flux of MLS110213~ is possibly explained by the distance to the source and accentuated by the low temperature of the emitting region, as estimated by the {\sc cyclops} fit. This fit predicts a modulation of the X-ray light curves with the minimum flux from phases 0.2 to 0.5, caused by partial self-eclipse of the emitting region. Deep X-ray observations of MLS110213\ would be very useful to constrain the geometric and physical properties of the system.
MLS110213\ is among the few polars not found by X-ray surveys. Some of them are classified as low accretion-rate polar (LARPs), a class now also recognised as pre-polars \citep[e.g.,][] {schwope2002,webbink2005,schmidt2005,breedt2012}. MLS110213\ shares the low X-ray flux and low temperature of this class, but the low X-ray brightness may be explained by the MLS110213\ distance. Its post-shock region seems to be dense, produced by a Roche lobe overflow mass transfer. This diverges from MLS110213\ being a pre-polar, since in them the mass transfer is supposed to originate from a secondary wind, with mass transfer rates about 100 times smaller than in standard polars. The most important signature of a low mass transfer rate, the cyclotron harmonics, is also lacking in the MLS110213\ spectra. Therefore, we do not classify MLS110213\ as a LARP/pre-polar.
\citet[and a series of previous articles]{li1998} study the effect of the WD magnetic field on the secondary magnetic braking. They show that the interaction of the magnetic fields of both stars can decrease the magnetic braking. This effect is more pronounced if the magnetic dipole axis is parallel to the WD spin axis. Hence they concluded that the evolution of magnetic CVs should take into account the direction of magnetic dipole axis. They argued that most polars tend to have magnetic field dipolar axis approximately aligned with the WD spin axis (at angles smaller than 25$\degr$) and, in this situation, the MB can be lessened by at least an order of magnitude in comparison with non-magnetic CVs. \citet{webbink2002} shows that this decrease in the magnetic braking can populate the period gap in polars. The inclination of the WD dipolar magnetic field obtained by our {\sc cyclops} modelling of MLS110213\ is 25$\degr$. This value is consistent with the "aligned" field scenario.
MLS110213\ is a new eclipsing polar above the period gap. Its post-shock region is cooler than in most mCVs, indicating a low-mass WD. MLS110213\ populates a rare sub-group of polars, near the upper limit of the period distribution, important to understand the evolution of mCVs. Our modelling is a first step to determine parameters as the magnetic field intensity and inclination, which could be used to constrain evolutionary models of mCVs.
\section*{Acknowledgements}
KMGS acknowledge Roland Walter for helping with the X-ray data. We acknowledge Andrew Drake for kindly providing us with CRTS data before the public release. The CRTS survey is supported by the U.S.~National Science Foundation under grants AST-0909182. The CSS survey is funded by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration under Grant No. NNG05GF22G issued through the Science Mission Directorate Near-Earth Objects Observations Program. This publication makes use of data products from the Two Micron All Sky Survey, which is a joint project of the University of Massachusetts and the Infrared Processing and Analysis Center/California Institute of Technology, funded by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and the National Science Foundation. This publication makes use of data products from the Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer, which is a joint project of the University of California, Los Angeles, and the Jet Propulsion Laboratory/California Institute of Technology, funded by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. This study was partially supported by: CNPq (CVR:306103/2012-5, KMGS:302071/2013-0) and FAPESP (LAA: 2012/09716-6 and 2013/18245-0; CVR: 2013/26258-4). We thank the referee for the valuable suggestions.
|
\section{Acknowledgements}
This research is supported in part by NSF CISE Expeditions award CCF-1139158 and DARPA XData Award FA8750-12-2-0331, and gifts from Amazon Web Services, Google, SAP, Apple, Inc., Cisco, Clearstory Data, Cloudera, Ericsson, Facebook, GameOnTalis, General Electric, Hortonworks, Huawei, Intel, Microsoft, NetApp, Oracle, Samsung, Splunk, VMware, WANdisco and Yahoo!.
Thanks to Trevor Darrell, Yangqing Jia, and Sergey Karayev who provided featurized imagenet data, Ben Recht who provided valuable ideas about derivative-free optimization and feedback, and Shivaram Venkataraman, Peter Bailis, Alan Fekete, Dan Crankshaw, Sanjay Krishnan, Xinghao Pan, and Kevin Jamieson for helpful feedback.
\section{Architecture}
\label{sec:architecture}
\mlopt is built on top of Apache Spark and MLI. These systems have been
designed to support high performance iterative MapReduce algorithms on working
sets that fit into cluster memory, and simplified development of machine
learning algorithms, respectively. It has been shown that these systems can
outperform conventional MapReduce-based systems for machine learning like
\cite{mahout}, often by an order of magnitude. We leverage features of both
systems in our design and experiments. Since both Spark and MLI are written in
Scala, we chose to write \mlopt in Scala as well to leverage tight integration
with the existing systems and libraries available in the JVM ecosystem. Our
system is a component of MLbase~\cite{Kraska13},
and an important component of MLbase is the MLbase Optimizer, designed to
automate the process of constructing and refining machine learning pipelines.
\mlopt represents a first effort at building such an optimizer and is a central
component to the design of this system.
The architecture of \mlopt consists of three abstract entities: A
\emph{Driver}, one or more \emph{Searchers}, and zero or more \emph{Executors}.
These entities are implemented as \texttt{akka} Actors, which enables a
concurrent programming model that supports asynchronous communication between
these entities. A graphical depiction of these entities is shown in
Figure~\ref{fig:architecture} and a summary of the protocol between these
entities is captured in Figure~\ref{tab:protocol}. Additionally, models are trained in a \emph{parallel dataflow} system, whose computational model---iterative MapReduce---lends itself well to expressing a large class of machine
learning algorithms. The responsibilities of each entity are described below.
\begin{figure}
\includegraphics[width=\columnwidth]{figures/architecture.pdf}
\caption{The Driver is responsible for defining a search space over which models are to be trained. The Searcher deterimines which configurations to try and, based on the results which ones to try next. It may interact with external search routines to accomplish this. The Executor is responsible for evaluating model configurations and reporting results - it may evaluate a particular configuration over a cluster of machines.}
\label{fig:architecture}
\end{figure}
\subsection{Driver}
The driver is the main entry point for a \mlopt model search. The Driver's
primary responsibilities include instantiating one or more Searchers and
collecting results from the search process. End users typically interact with
the system through the Driver, which is instantiated with a dataset, a search
space which describes the space of model configurations to explore, and
information about how to configure the searcher and what type of searcher to
instantiate (e.g. Grid, Random, HyperOpt). The driver communicates asynchronously
with the searcher and collects newly trained models as they become available.
It can also be polled by user programs for new information about search
progress and models that have been trained.
\subsection{Searcher}
A Searcher is responsible for instantiating Executors, deciding on model
configurations for evaluation, farming that work out to its Executors, and
relaying results back to the Driver. Importantly, we also centralize the
logical and physical optimizations in the implementation of the searcher.
Namely, it is the searcher's job to figure out how best to implement batching
(by sending jobs to a Batch Executor), resource allocation (by evaluating results
from Executors before letting work continue), and to implement the search
method it is responsible for.
The architecture is such that we may use external libraries or service calls to
implement the searching logic. For example, in implementing a HyperOpt based
searcher, the HyperOptSearcher code makes external service calls to a web service
that is simply a thin wrapper around the existing Hyperopt
library~\cite{hyperopt}.
By implementing a few concrete methods for suggesting points in the
hyperparameter space and ingesting new results, our system allows easy addition
of new algorithms for hyperparameter optimization as they become available.
Additionally, new algorithms will benefit from the systems level optimizations
made for all algorithms.
\subsection{Executor}
A Executor in \mlopt is an abstract entity capable of evaluating model
configurations. A \mlopt Executor may launch jobs that are executed on
hundreds of nodes. In practice, our executors usually have a handle to an
entire cluster, which allows them to execute their jobs in a data parallel
fashion. As such, we are often in a situation where only a single Executor
needs to be created. While this detail need not be evident to the searchers, in
the case of batching, for example, the \emph{type} of Executor (that is, a
Batch Executor vs. a Sequential Executor) can play a role in how tasks are
allocated to it.
\begin{figure*}
\begin{tabular}{ll}
\qquad
\qquad
\qquad &
\begin{subtable}[h]{0.30\textwidth}
\begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|}
\hline
Message & Result & Meaning \\ \hline
RunSearch(space: SearchSpace, data: Table) & ~ & Begin Search Process \\
TopModel() & Model & Return best model after search. \\
AllBuilt() & Boolean & Is search process finished? \\
ModelsBuilt() & Int & How many models have been built? \\
Models() & Seq[Model] & Return all models that have been built. \\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\caption{Driver/Searcher Protocol}
\end{subtable} \\
&
\begin{subtable}[h]{0.30\textwidth}
\begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|}
\hline
Message & Result & Meaning \\ \hline
BuildModel(config: ModelConfig) & ~ & Add model with this configuration to work queue. \\
DoWork() & ~ & Begin consuming work queue. \\
StopWork() & ~ & Stop consuming work queue. \\
QueueSize() & Int & How big is your work queue? \\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\caption{Searcher/Executor Protocol}
\end{subtable} \\
&
\begin{subtable}[h]{0.30\textwidth}
\begin{tabular}{|l|l|}
\hline
Message & Meaning \\ \hline
ModelBuilt(model: Model) & A model has been built with a particular configuration and error. \\
WorkDone() & My work queue is empty. \\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\caption{Executor/Searcher Protocol}
\end{subtable} \\
\end{tabular}
\caption{Summary of protocol between Driver, Searcher, and Executor.}
\label{tab:protocol}
\end{figure*}
\subsection{Hybrid Parallel Dataflow and Asynchronous Control for Model Search}
In basing our system on Spark, we are explicitly employing a parallel dataflow
engine to train our models. At the same time, all of the hyperparameter tuning
happens in an asynchronous fashion with Actors handing out jobs and receiving
results asynchronously. As such, our system can be viewed as a hybrid of a
traditional BSP computation environment with an asynchronous control plane. By
employing this approach, we are able to isolate the portions of our system that
need to be high performance, fault tolerant, and data parallel from those that
need to be asynchronous and reactive, leading to a system that achieves both
goals.
\subsubsection{Logistic Regression}
Logistic Regression is a widely used machine learning model for binary classification.
The procedure estimates a set of model parameters, $w \in \reals^d$, given a set of data features $X \in \reals^{n \times d}$, and binary labels $y \in {0,1}^n$.
The optimal model $w^*\in\reals^d$ can be found by minimizing the negative likelihood function, $f(w) = -\log p(X|w)$.
Taking the gradient of the negative log likelihood, we have:
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:grad}
\nabla f = \sum_{i=1}^n \bigg [\big (\sigma(w^\top x_i)
- y_i \big ) x_i \bigg ]\,,
\end{equation}
where $\sigma$ is the logistic function.
The gradient descent algorithm (Algorithm~\ref{fig:logreg}) must evaluate this gradient function for all input data points, a task which can be easily performed in a data parallel fashion. Similarly, minibatch Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) has an identical access pattern and can be optimized in the same way by working with contiguous subsets of the input data on each partition.
\begin{algorithm}[]
\SetKwInOut{Input}{input}\SetKwInOut{Output}{output}
\Input{X, LearningRate, MaxIterations}
\Output{Model}
$i \gets 0$\;
Initialize Model\;
\While{$i < MaxIterations$}{
read current\;
Model $\gets$ Model - LearningRate * Gradient(Model, X)\;
$i \gets i + 1$\;
}
\caption{Pseudocode for convex optimization via gradient descent.}
\label{fig:logreg}
\end{algorithm}
The above formulation represents the computation of the gradient by taking a single point and single model at a time.
We can naturally extend this to multiple models simultaneously if we represent our models as a matrix $W \in \reals^{d \times k}$, where $k$ is the number of models we want to train simultaneously, i.e.,
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:batchgrad}
\nabla f = \bigg [X^\top \big (\sigma(X W)
- y \big ) \bigg ]\,.
\end{equation}
This operation can be easily parallelized across data items with each worker in a distributed system computing the portion of the gradient for the data that it stores locally.
Specifically, the portion of the gradient that is derived from the set of local data is computed independently at each machine, and these gradients are simply summed at the end of an iteration.
The size of the partial gradients (in this case $O(d \times k)$) is much smaller than the actual data (which is $O(n \times d)$), so overheads of transferring these over the network is relatively small.
For large datasets, the time spent performing this operation is almost completely determined by the cost of performing two matrix multiplications---the input to the $\sigma$ function which takes $O(ndk)$ operations and requires a scan of the input data as well as the final multiply by $X^\top$ which also takes $O(ndk)$ operations and requires a scan of the data.
This formulation allows us to leverage high performance linear algebra libraries that implement BLAS~\cite{blas}---these libraries are tailored to execute exactly dense linear algebra operations as efficiently as possible and are automatically tuned to the architecture we are running on via \cite{atlas}.
The careful reader will note that if individual data points are of sufficiently low dimension, the gradient function in Equation~\ref{eq:grad} can be executed in a single pass over the data from main memory because the second reference to $x_i$ will likely be a cache hit, whereas we assume that $X$ is big enough that it is unlikely to fit entirely in CPU cache.
We examine this effect more carefully in Section~\ref{sec:evaluation}.
\subsubsection{Machine Balance}
One obvious question the reader may ask is why implementing these algorithms via matrix-multiplication should offer speedup over vector/vector versions of the algorithms.
After all, the runtime complexities of both algorithms are identical.
However, modern x86 machines have been shown to have processor cores that significantly outperform their ability to read data from main memory~\cite{McCalpin1995}.
In particular, on a typical x86 machine, the hardware is capable of reading 0.45B doubles/s from main memory per core, while the hardware is capable of executing 6.8B FLOPS in the same amount of time~\cite{McCalpin2007}.
Specifically, on the machines we tested (Amazon \texttt{c3.8xlarge} EC2 instances), LINPACK reported peak GFLOPS of 110 GFLOPS/s when running on all cores, while the STREAM benchmark reported 60GB/s of throughput across 16 physical cores. This equates to a machine balance of approximately 15 FLOPS per double precision floating point number read from main memory if the machine is using both all available FLOPs and all available memory bandwidth solely for its core computation.
This approximate value for the machine balance suggests an opportunity for optimization by reducing unused resources, i.e., wasted cycles.
By performing more computation for every number read from memory, we can reduce this resource gap.
The Roofline model~\cite{Williams:2009cx} offers a more formal way to study this effect.
According to the model, total throughput of an algorithm is bounded by the smaller of 1) peak floating point performance of the machine, and 2) memory bandwidth times operational intensity of the algorithm, where operational intensity is a function of the number of FLOPs performed per byte read from memory.
That is, for an efficiently implemented algorithm, the bottleneck is either I/O bandwidth from memory or CPU FLOPs.
Analysis of the unbatched gradient descent algorithm reveals that the number of FLOPs required per byte is quite small---just over 2 flops per number read from memory---a multiply and an add---and since we represent our data as double-precision floating point numbers, this equates to 1/2 FLOP per byte.
Batching allows us to move ``up the roofline'' by increasing algorithmic complexity by a factor of $k$, our batch size.
The exact setting of $k$ that achieves balance (and maximizes throughput) is hardware dependent, but we show in Section~\ref{sec:evaluation} that on modern machines, $k=10$ is a reasonable choice.
\subsubsection{Amortized Overheads}
In the context of a distributed machine learning system like MLbase, which runs on Apache Spark, delays due to task scheduling and serialization/deserialization can be significant relative to the time spent computing.
By batching our updates into tasks that require more computation, we are able to reduce the aggregate overhead of launching new tasks substantially.
Assuming a fixed scheduling delay of 200ms per task, if we have a batch size of $k=10$ models, the average task overhead per model iteration drops to 20ms.
Over the course of hundreds of iterations for hundreds of models, the savings can be substantial.
For a typical distributed system, a model update requires at least two network round-trips to complete: one to launch a task on each worker node, and one to report the results of the task back to the master.
If we were indeed bound by network messaging, then amortizing this cost across multiple models could substantially reduce total overhead due to network latency.
In our experiments, however, the number of messages is relatively small and the network overheads are substantially lower than scheduling and computation overheads, so future work in this setting should focus on minimizing scheduling overheads.
\section{Design Space Evaluation}
\label{sec:designeval}
Now that we have laid out the possible optimizations available to \mlopt, we identify available speedups from these optimizations.
We validated the strategies for model search and bandit resource allocation on five representative datasets across a variable sized model fitting budget.
In particular, these results motivated which model search strategies to incorporate into \mlopt and validate our bandit approach.
Next, we tested our batching optimizations on datasets of various sizes in a cluster environment, to better understand the impact of batching as models and datasets get bigger.
In all experiments, before training, we split our base datasets into $70\%$ training, $20\%$ validation, and $10\%$ testing.
In all cases, models are fit to minimize classification error on the training set, while model search occurs based on classification error on the validation set (validation error).\footnote{While we have thus far discussed model quality, for the remainder of the paper we report validation error, i.e., the inverse of quality, because it is more commonly reported in practice.}
We only report validation error numbers here, but test error was similar.
\mlopt is capable of optimizing for arbitrary performance metrics as long as they can be computed mid-flight, and extends to other supervised learning scenarios.
\subsection{Model Search}
We validated our multiple model search strategies on a series of small datasets with well-formed binary classification problems embedded in them.
These datasets come from the UCI Machine Learning Repository~\cite{ucirepo}.
The model search task involved tuning four hyperparameters---learning rate, L2 regularization parameter, size of a random projection matrix, and noise associated with the random feature matrix.
The random features are constructed according to the procedure outlined in \cite{RandomKitchenSink}.
To accommodate for the linear scale-up that comes with adding random features,
we down sample the number of data points for each model training by the same
proportion.
Our ranges for these hyperparameters were learning rate $\in (10^{-3}, 10^{1})$, regularization $\in (10^{-4}, 10^{2})$, projection size $\in (1 \times d, 10 \times d)$, and noise $\in (10^{-4}, 10^{2})$.
\begin{figure*}[ht]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.7\textwidth]{figures/SearchComparison.pdf}
\caption{Search methods were compared across several datasets with a variable number of function evaluations. Classification error on a validation dataset is shown for each combination. HyperOpt and Auto-WEKA provide state of the art results, while random search performs best of the classic methods.}
\label{fig:searchexps}
\end{figure*}
We evaluated seven search methods: grid search, random search, Powell's method, the Nelder-Mead method, Auto-WEKA, HyperOpt, and Spearmint.
Each dataset was processed with each search method with a varying number of function calls, chosen to align well with a regular grid of $n^4$ points where we vary $n$ from 2 to 5.
This restriction on a regular grid is only necessary for grid search but included for comparability.
Results of the search experiments are presented in Figure~\ref{fig:searchexps}.
Each tile represents a different dataset/search method combination.
Each bar within the tile represents a different budget in terms of function calls/models trained.
The height of each bar represents classification error on the validation dataset.
With this experiment, we are looking for methods that converge to good models in as small a budget as possible.
Of all methods tried, HyperOpt and Auto-WEKA tend to achieve this criteria best, but random search is not far behind.
We chose to integrate HyperOpt into the larger experiments because it performed
slightly better than Auto-WEKA.
Our architecture fully supports additional search methods, and we expect to implement additional methods in our system over time.
\subsection{Bandit Resource Allocation}
We evaluated the \mlopt bandit resource allocation scheme on the same datasets with random search and 625 total function evaluations---the same as the maximum budget in the search experiments.
The key question to answer here was whether we could identify and terminate poorly performing models early in the training process without significantly affecting overall search quality.
\begin{figure}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=\columnwidth]{figures/banditPlot.pdf}
\caption{Here we show the effects of bandit resource allocation on trained model performance. Model search completes in an average of 83\% fewer passes over the training data than without bandit allocation. Except in one case, validation error is nearly indistinguishable vs. the case where we do not employ the bandit strategy.}
\label{fig:earlystopexps}
\end{figure}
In Figure~\ref{fig:earlystopexps} we illustrate the effect that the \mlopt bandit strategy
has on validation error as well as on the number of total scans of the input dataset.
Models were allocated 100 iterations to converge on the correct answer. After the first 10 iterations, models that were not within 50\% of the classification error of the best model trained so far were preemptively terminated. A large percentage of models that show little or no promise of converging to a reasonable validation error are eliminated.
In the figure, the top set of bars represents the number of scans of the training data at the end of the entire search process.
The bottom set of bars represent the validation error achieved at the end of the search procedure.
The three scenarios evaluated---No Bandit, Bandit, and Baseline---represent the results of the search with no bandit allocation procedure (that is, each model is trained to completion), the algorithm the bandit allocation procedure enabled, and the baseline error rate for each dataset.
There was an 86\% decrease in total epochs across these five datasets, and the validation error is roughly comparable to the unoptimized strategy.
On average, this method achieves 93\% reduction in model error vs. not stopping
early when compared with validation error of a simple baseline model.
This relatively simple resource allocation method presents opportunities for dramatic reductions in runtime.
\subsection{Batching}
To evaluate the batching optimization, we used a synthetic dataset of $1,000,000$ data points in various dimensionality.
To illustrate the effects of amortizing scheduler overheads vs. achieving machine balance, these datasets vary in size between 750MB and 75GB.
We trained these models on a 16-node cluster of \texttt{c3.8xlarge} nodes on Amazon EC2, running Apache Spark 1.1.0.
We trained a logistic regression model on these data points via gradient descent with no batching (batch size = 1) and batching up to 20 models at once.
We implemented both a naive version of this optimization---with while loops evaluating equation~\ref{eq:grad} over each model in each task, as well as a more sophisticated version of this model which makes BLAS calls to perform the computation described in equation~\ref{eq:batchgrad}.
For the batching experiments only, we run each algorithm for 10 iterations over the input data.
\begin{figure}
\begin{subtable}[h]{0.4\textwidth}
\begin{tabular}{|r|r|r|r|r|}
\hline
\diagbox{Batch Size}{D} & 100 & 1000 & 10000 \\
\hline
1 & 826.44 & 599.60 & 553.59 \\
\hline
2 & 1521.23 & 1214.37 & 701.07 \\
\hline
5 & 2411.53 & 3037.97 & 992.01 \\
\hline
8 & 5557.69 & 3502.79 & 1243.79 \\
\hline
10 & 7148.53 & 4216.44 & 1769.12 \\
\hline
15 & 7874.01 & 6260.14 & 2485.15 \\
\hline
20 & 11881.18 & 8248.36 & 2445.98 \\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\caption{Models trained per hour for varying batch sizes and model complexity. Data sizes ranged from 750MB (D=100) to 75GB (D=10000).}
\end{subtable}
\begin{subtable}[h]{0.4\textwidth}
\begin{tabular}{|r|r|r|r|r|}
\hline
\diagbox{Batch Size}{D} & 100 & 1000 & 10000 \\
\hline
1 & 1.00 & 1.00 & 1.00 \\
\hline
2 & 1.84 & 2.02 & 1.26 \\
\hline
5 & 2.91 & 5.06 & 1.79 \\
\hline
8 & 6.72 & 5.84 & 2.24 \\
\hline
10 & 8.64 & 7.03 & 3.19 \\
\hline
15 & 9.52 & 10.44 & 4.48 \\
\hline
20 & 14.37 & 13.75 & 4.41 \\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\caption{Speedup factor vs fastest sequential unbatched method for varying batch size and model complexity.}
\end{subtable}
\caption{Effect of batching is examined on 16 nodes with a synthetic dataset. Speedups diminish but remain significant as models increase in complexity.}
\label{fig:smallbatch}
\end{figure}
In Figure~\ref{fig:smallbatch} we show the total throughput of the system in terms of models trained per hour varying the batch size and the model complexity.
For models trained on the smaller dataset, we see the total number of models per hour can increase by up to a factor of 15 for large batch sizes.
This effect should not be surprising, as the actual time spent computing is on the order of milliseconds and virtually all the time goes to scheduling task execution.
In its current implementation, due to these scheduling overheads, this implementation of the algorithm under Spark will not outperform a single machine implementation for a dataset this small.
We discuss an alternative execution strategy that would better utilize cluster resources for situations where the input dataset is small in Section~\ref{sec:futureworkconclusions}.
\begin{figure}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=\columnwidth]{figures/tupaqBatch.pdf}
\caption{Leveraging high performance linear algebra libraries for batching leads to substantial speedups vs. naive methods. At bottom, we show models per hour via the fastest sequential (non-batched) strategy and demonstrate a 5x improvement in throughput.}
\label{fig:mmbatchexps}
\end{figure}
At the other end of the spectrum in terms of data size and model complexity, we see the effects of scheduler delay start to lessen, and we maximize throughput in terms of models per hour at batch size 15.
In Figure~\ref{fig:mmbatchexps} we compare two different strategies of implementing batching---one via the naive method, and the other via the more sophisticated method---computing gradient updates via BLAS matrix multiplication.
For small batch sizes, the naive implementation actually performs faster than the BLAS optimized one.
The matrix-based implementation easily dominates the naive implementation as batch size increases.
This is because the algorithm is slightly more cache efficient and requires only a single pass through the input data.
The overall speedup due to batching is nearly a factor of 5 when executed via matrix multiplication.
The downside to batching in the context of PAQ planning is that the system may gain information by trying plans sequentially that could inform subsequent plans that is not incorporated in later runs.
By fixing our batch size to a relatively small constant (10) we are able to balance this tradeoff.
\section{Putting It All Together}
\label{sec:evaluation}
Now that we have examined each point in the PAQ planning design space individually, let us now evaluate end-to-end performance of the \mlopt planner.
By employing batching, using state-of-the-art search methods, and using bandit resource allocation to terminate non-promising models, we are able to see a 10x increase in raw throughput of the system in terms of models trained per unit time, while finding PAQ plans that have as good or higher quality than those found with the baseline approach.
We evaluated \mlopt on very large scale data problems, at cluster sizes ranging from 16 to 128 nodes and datasets ranging from 30GB to over 3TB in size.
These sizes represent the size of the actual features the model was trained on, \emph{not} the raw data from which these features were derived.
\subsection{Platform Configuration}
We evaluated \mlopt on Linux machines running under Amazon EC2, instance type \texttt{c3.8xlarge}.
These machines were configured with Redhat Enterprise Linux, Scala 2.10, version 1.9 of the Anaconda python distribution from Continuum Analytics\cite{anaconda}, and Apache Spark 1.1.0.
Additionally, we made use of Hadoop 1.0.4 configured on local disks as our data store for the large scale experiments.
Finally, we use MLI as of commit 3e164a2d8c as a basis for \mlopt.
\subsubsection{Apache Spark Configuration}
As with any complex system, proper configuration of the platform to execute a given workload is necessary and Apache Spark is no exception.
Specifically---choosing a correct BLAS implementation, configuring spark to use it, and picking the right balance of executor threads per executor process took considerable effort. Full details of our configuration are available on request.
\subsubsection{Experimental Setup and Datasets}
The complete system involves a Scala code base built on top of Apache Spark, MLlib, and MLI.
Here, we ran experiments on 16 and 128 machines.
We used two datasets with two different learning objectives to evaluate our system at scale.
The first dataset is a pre-featurized version of the ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge 2010 (ILSVRC2010) dataset~\cite{imagenet2010}, featurized using a procedure attributed to~\cite{Deng:2012tg}.
This process yields a dataset with $160,000$ features and approximately $1,200,000$ examples, or 1.4 TB of raw image features.
In our 16-node experiments we down sample to the first $16,000$ of these features and use 20\% of the base dataset for model training, which is approximately 30GB of data.
In the 128-node experiments we train on the entire dataset.
We explore five hyperparameters here---one parameter for the classifier we train---SVM or logistic regression, as well as learning rate and L2 Regularization parameters for each matching the above experiments.
We allot a budget of 128 model fittings to the problem.
As in Figure~\ref{fig:photos}, we search for a PAQ plan capable of discriminating plants from non-plants given these image features.
The images are generally in 1000 base classes, but these classes form a hierarchy and thus can be mapped into plant vs. non-plant categories.
Baseline error for this modeling task is $14.2\%$, which is a bit more skewed than the previous examples.
Our goal is to reduce validation error as much as possible, but our experience with this particular dataset has put a lower bound on validation error to around $9\%$ accuracy with linear classification models.
The second dataset is a pre-featurized version of the TIMIT Acoustic-Phonetic continuous speech corpus~\cite{timit}, featurized according to the procedure described in~\cite{timitfeatures}---yielding roughly $2,300,000$ examples each having $440$ features. While this dataset is quite small, in order to achieve strong performance on this dataset, other researchers have noted that Kernel Methods offer the best performance~\cite{posen}. Following the process of \cite{RandomKitchenSink}, this involves expanding the feature space of the dataset by nearly two orders of magnitude, yielding a dataset that has $204,800$ features. Again, this is approximately 3.4 TB of speech features.
We explore five hyperparameters here---one parameter describing the distribution family of the random projection matrix---in this case Cauchy or Gaussian, the scale and skew of these distributions, as well as the L2 regularization parameter for this model, which will have a different setting for each distribution.
A necessary precondition to supporting PAQs like those in Figure~\ref{fig:vms}, this dataset provides a examples of labeled phonemes, and our challenge is to find a model capable of labeling phonemes given some input audio. Baseline error for this modeling task is $95\%$, and state-of-the-art performance on this dataset is $35\%$ error~\cite{posen}.
\subsection{Optimization Effects}
In Figure~\ref{fig:timingexps} we can see the effects of batching and bandit allocation on the PAQ planning process for the ImageNet dataset.
Specifically, given that we want to evaluate the fitness of 128 models, it takes nearly 2 hours to fit all 128 models on the 30GB dataset of data on the 16 node cluster.
By comparison, with the bandit rule and batching turned on, the system takes just 10 minutes to train a random search model to completion and a bit longer to train a HyperOpt model to completion, a 10x speedup in the case of random search and a 7x speedup in the case of HyperOpt.
HyperOpt takes slightly longer because it does a good job of picking points that do not need to be terminated preemptively by the bandit strategy. That is, more of the models that HyperOpt selects are trained to completion than random search. Accordingly, HyperOpt arrives at a better model than random search given the same training budget.
\begin{figure}[!htbp] \centering
\begin{tabular}{|r|r|r|r|}
\hline
\diagbox{Optimization}{Search Method} & Grid & Random & HyperOpt \\
\hline
\hline
None & $104.7$ & $100.5$ & $103.9$ \\
\hline
Bandits Only & $31.3$ & $29.7$ & $50.5$ \\
\hline
Batching Only & $31.3$ & $32.1$ & $31.8$ \\
\hline
All (\emph{\mlopt}) & $11.5$ & $10.4$ & $15.8$ \\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\caption{Learning time in minutes for a 128-configuration budget across various optimization levels for ImageNet data. Unoptimized, sequential execution takes over 100 minutes regardless of search procedure used. Fully optimized execution can be an order of magnitude faster with \mlopt.}
\label{fig:timingexps}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure}
\centering
\begin{tabular}{|r|r|r|}
\hline
\emph{Search Method} & \emph{Search Time (m)} & \emph{Test Error (\%)} \\
\hline
\hline
Grid (unoptimized) & 104.7 & 11.05 \\
\hline
Random (optimized) & 10.4 & 11.41 \\
\hline
HyperOpt (optimized) & 15.8 & 10.38 \\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\caption{Both optimized HyperOpt and Random search perform significantly faster than unoptimized Grid search, while HyperOpt yields the best model for this image classification problem.}
\label{fig:modelconv}
\end{figure}
Turning our attention to model convergence illustrated in Figure~\ref{fig:modelconv}, we can see that on this dataset HyperOpt converges to the best answer in just 15 minutes, while random search converges to within $5\%$ of the best test error achieved by grid search a full order of magnitude faster than the baseline approach.
\subsection{Large Scale Speech and Vision}
\begin{figure}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.35\textwidth,scale=0.5]{figures/optimizationConvergenceComparisonHuge.pdf}
\caption{Training a model with a budget of 32 function evaluations on a 1.2m $\times$ 160k dataset takes 90 minutes on a 128-node cluster with \mlopt.}
\label{fig:modelconvhuge}
\end{figure}
Because we employ data-parallel versions of our learning algorithms, achieving horizontal scalability with additional compute resources is trivial.
\mlopt readily scales to multi-terabyte datasets that are an order of magnitude more complicated with respect to the feature space.
For these experiments, we ran with the ImageNet models with same parameter search settings as the smaller dataset but this time with a fixed budget of 40 function evaluations.
Our results are illustrated in Figure~\ref{fig:modelconvhuge}.
Using the fully optimized HyperOpt based search method, we are able to search this space in under 90 minutes, and the method is able to achieve a validation error of $8.2\%$ for this dataset in that time.
In contrast, training all 32 models to completion using sequential grid search would have taken over 8 hours and cost upwards of \$2000.00---an expense we chose not to incur.
\begin{figure}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.35\textwidth,scale=0.5]{figures/optimizationConvergenceComparisonTimitLg.pdf}
\caption{Training a multiclass phoneme classification model on 3.7 TB of TIMIT features yields accuracy approaching that of state of the art models in 3.5 hours with \mlopt.}
\label{fig:modelconvtimit}
\end{figure}
Turning our attention to an entirely different application area, we demonstrate the ability of the system to scale to a multi-terabyte, multi-class phoneme classification problem. Here, a multi-class kernel SVM was trained on $2,251,569$ data points with $204,800$ features, in $147$ distinct classes. As shown in Figure~\ref{fig:modelconvtimit}, the system is capable of getting to a model with $39.5\%$ test error---approaching that of state-of-the-art results in speech-to-text modeling---in just 3.5 hours.
For this dataset, training the entire budget to completion would have taken 35 hours.
\section{Future Work and Conclusions}
\label{sec:futureworkconclusions}
In this work, we have introduced the PAQ Planning problem, and demonstrated the
impact of logical and physical optimizations to improve the quality and
efficiency of PAQ planning. Specifically, by combining better model search
methods, batching techniques, and bandit methods, \mlopt can find
high quality query plans for PAQs on very large datasets
an order of magnitude more efficiently than than the baseline approach.
\mlopt is a first step in tackling the challenging PAQ
planning problem. Indeed, several avenues exist for further exploration, and
we note two broad classes of natural extensions to \mlopt.
{\bf Machine learning extensions}. From an accuracy point of view, as
additional model families are added to MLbase, \mlopt could naturally lend
itself to the construction of \emph{ensemble models} at training time -
effectively \emph{for free}. Ensembles over a diverse set of methods are
particularly known to improve predictive performance, and there may be better
PAQ planning strategies for ensemble methods that encourage heterogeneity among
ensemble methods. Of course, as more models and more hyperparameter
configurations are considered, PAQ planners run the risk of overfitting to the
validation data, and accounting for this issue, e.g., by \emph{controlling the
false discovery rate}~\cite{Benjamini1995}, would become especially important.
From a performance perspective, \emph{adaptive and accelerated gradient
methods} could be used to speed convergence of individual models by requiring
fewer passes over the training data~\cite{tseng08, duchi2011adaptive}.
Moreover, theoretically supported multi-armed bandit algorithms, including those
that are aware that multiple model
configurations are being sampled simultaneously, may also improve performance.
Finally, \emph{unsupervised learning methods}, including dimensionality
reduction and exploratory analysis, could be used in conjunction with
supervised approaches to speed up and/or improve the accuracy of supervised
learning methods.
{\bf Systems extensions}. Multi-stage \emph{ML pipelines}, in which
the initial data is transformed one or more times before being fed into
a supervised learning algorithm, are common in most
practical ML systems. Since each stage will likely introduce additional
hyperparameters, PAQ planning becomes more challenging
in the pipeline setting. In a regime where a dataset is
relatively small but users still have access to cluster resources, there can be
benefits (both in terms of simplicity and speed) to broadcast the data to each
worker machine and train various models locally on each worker. PAQ planning
could be made more efficient by considering the tradeoffs between these regimes.
Training models on \emph{subsets of data} can efficiently yield
noisy evaluations of candidate models, though careful subsampling is required
to yield high-quality and trustworthy PAQ plans~\cite{BlinkDB}.
Akin to traditional query planners, PAQ
planners can learn from knowledge of the data they store and historical
workloads. A PAQ planner could store \emph{planner statistics} to tailor their
search strategy to the types of models have been used for a user's data in the
past. The evaluation of these techniques in \mlopt will be natural once the system has been exposed to a larger set of workloads.
Moving forward, we believe that \mlopt and extensions such as those
described above, will serve as a foundation for the automated construction of
end-to-end pipelines for machine learning.
\section{Introduction}
\label{sec:intro}
Rapidly growing data volumes coupled with the maturity of sophisticated statistical techniques have led to a new type of data-intensive workload: predictive analytics over large scale, distributed datasets. Indeed, the support of predictive analytics is an increasingly active area of database systems research. Several systems that integrate statistical query processing with a data management system have been developed. However, these systems force users to describe their statistical model in dense mathematical notation~\cite{simsql,SystemML} or in terms of a specific model~\cite{MADLib,Zhang:2014tf,Deshpande:2006wi} and provide little guidance about the proper configuration of the model---that is, a user must know that a linear SVM or Kalman filter is a good statistical procedure to answer their query, and configure that procedure appropriately.
\begin{figure}
\begin{subfigure}[b]{0.5\textwidth}
\begin{lstlisting}[language=SQL, frame=shadowbox, breaklines=true, autogobble=true, morekeywords={PREDICT,GIVEN}, escapechar=@, belowskip=\smallskipamount, aboveskip=\smallskipamount]
SELECT vm.sender, vm.arrived,
@\HighlightFrom@PREDICT(vm.text, vm.audio)@\HighlightTo@
@\HighlightFrom@GIVEN LabeledVoiceMails@\HighlightTo@
FROM VoiceMails vm
WHERE vm.user = 'Bob' AND vm.listened is NULL
ORDER BY vm.arrived
DESC LIMIT 50
\end{lstlisting}
\caption{Speech-to-text transcription.}
\label{fig:vms}
\end{subfigure}
\begin{subfigure}[b]{0.5\textwidth}
\begin{lstlisting}[language=SQL, frame=shadowbox, breaklines=true, autogobble=true, morekeywords={PREDICT,GIVEN}, escapechar=@, aboveskip=\smallskipamount, belowskip=\smallskipamount]
SELECT p.image
FROM Pictures p
WHERE @\HighlightFrom@PREDICT(p.tag, p.photo) = 'Plant' GIVEN@\HighlightTo@ @\HighlightFrom@LabeledPhotos@\HighlightTo@
AND p.likes > 500
\end{lstlisting}
\caption{Photo classification.}
\label{fig:photos}
\end{subfigure}
\caption{Two examples of PAQs, with the predictive clauses highlighted
in green. (\protect\ref{fig:vms}) returns the predicted text transcription of Bob's voicemails from their audio content.
(\protect\ref{fig:photos}) finds popular pictures of
photos based on an image classification model---even if the images are not
labeled. Each of these use cases may require considerable training data.}
\label{fig:paq}
\end{figure}
In our work, our goal is to raise the level of abstraction for data analysts. Instead of choosing a specific statistical model and featurization strategy, we provide a declarative query interface where users declare that they wish to predict an attribute from some other collection of attributes and optionally provide example training data. Given these inputs, the system automatically makes predictions for the target attribute on new data. With our system, users issue Predictive Analytic Queries, or PAQs, which are traditional database queries, augmented with new predictive clauses. Two examples of PAQs are given in Figure~\ref{fig:paq}---with the predictive clauses highlighted. The output of a predictive clause is an attribute like any other---one that can be grouped and sorted on or used in other clauses. The syntax of these predictive clauses is as follows:
\[
\text{\texttt{PREDICT} ($a_{predicted}$ [, $a_1$, ..., $a_n$ ]) \texttt{GIVEN} $R$}
\]
Where, $a_{predicted}$ is the attribute to be predicted. $a_1, ..., a_n$ is an optional set of predictor attributes. $R$ is a relation containing training examples with the restriction that $ \left\{a_{predicted}, a_1, ..., a_n\right\} - Attributes(R) = \emptyset $.
This syntax is general enough to support a wide range of predictive tasks---including classification, regression, and item recommendation.
Given recent advances in statistical methodology, supervised machine
learning (ML) techniques are a natural way to support the predictive clauses
in PAQs. In the supervised learning setting, a statistical model is created via
training data to relate the input attributes to the desired output
attribute. Furthermore, ML methods learn better models as the size of the
training data increases, and recent advances in distributed ML algorithm
development, are aimed at enabling
large-scale model training in the distributed setting.~\cite{agarwal14a,Panda:2009uh,MackeyTaJo11}
Unfortunately, the
application of supervised learning techniques to a new input dataset is
computationally demanding and technically challenging.
For a non-expert, the process of carefully preprocessing the input
attributes, selecting the appropriate ML model, and tuning its
hyperparameters can be an ad-hoc and time-consuming task.
For example, to build a predictive model for a classification task like the one shown in Figure~\ref{fig:photos} using conventional tools, a user needs to choose from one of many algorithms for extracting features from image data, then select an appropriate classification model---all the while tuning the configuration of each.
Finally, the user will need to settle on a strategy to select the best performing model. Failure to follow these steps can lead to models that do not work at all, or worse, provide inaccurate predictions.
In practice, this process of training a supervised model is highly procedural, with even ML experts often having to fall back on standard recipes (e.g. the libSVM guide~\cite{libsvmguide}) in the attempt to to obtain reasonable results.
At scale, the problem of finding a good model is exacerbated, and conventional approaches can be prohibitively expensive. For example, sequential grid search is a popular method implemented in many software packages~\cite{graphlabgrid,scikitlearn,caret}, but as we show, requires many more models to be trained than necessary to achieve good results.
At an abstract level the process of finding a good machine learning model is in some ways analogous to a query planning problem where the challenge is to construct a model from training data given a potential space of model families.
In the PAQ setting (illustrated in Figure~\ref{fig:pipeline}),
some process must be followed to refine the choice of feature and model selection, and in practice this problem is often iterative.
The \emph{PAQ planning problem} is the task of efficiently finding a high quality PAQ plan, given training data, a set of candidate statistical model families, and their configurations.
A good PAQ planner will return a high quality PAQ plan efficiently. The \emph{quality}
of a PAQ plan is measured in terms of a statistic relevant to the predictive
task, such as accuracy on validation data in the classification setting or the Mean Squared Error (MSE) in the regression setting.
\emph{Efficiency} is measured in terms of the total time to arrive at such a model---we refer to this as \emph{learning time}. In this work we focus on model search and hyperparameter tuning when the dimensionality of the search space is small, and training budget is also small. This scenario maps well to practical demands, given that there exist a limited set of learning algorithms and hyperparameters for a given predictive learning task, and the cost of training a model may be high, particularly in the large-scale setting. In such scenarios, PAQ planning can lead to substantial improvements in model quality. We further restrict our focus to model family selection and hyperparameter tuning, as opposed to also considering selection of appropriate featurizers. However, we believe the techniques presented here can be generalized to more complicated predictive analytic pipelines, since the number of established featurization techniques for a given domain is also limited.
\begin{figure}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=1.0\columnwidth]{figures/pipeline2.pdf}
\caption{Finding an appropriate predictive model is a process of continuous refinement. Each stage must be carefully tuned to ensure high quality. \mlopt automates this process.}
\label{fig:pipeline}
\end{figure}
In the remainder of the paper, we explore the challenges associated with PAQ planning
and introduce a PAQ planner for the MLbase system~\cite{Kraska13} for declarative machine learning, called the \textbf{T}raining-s\textbf{u}pported
\textbf{P}redictive \textbf{A}nalytic \textbf{Q}uery planner (\mlopt). The goal of \mlopt in the context of MLbase is to tackle the PAQ planning problem at scale. Using advanced search techniques, bandit resource allocation, and batching optimizations, \mlopt identifies a suitable model to satisfy a
user's high-level declarative query, thus differing from previous systems~\cite{MADLib,
Deshpande:2006wi, Wang:2008vy, Zhang:2014tf}
focused on predictive analytics, which force users to perform model
search themselves. Further, although the ML community has developed techniques
for finding good configurations for learning models, none have focused on
applying these techniques in the large-scale setting.
With \mlopt, we make the following contributions:
\begin{itemize}
\item We introduce PAQs, a declarative query interface that
enables analysts to operate on imputed attribute values.
\item We demonstrate the effectiveness of supervised ML techniques at
supporting PAQs, both in terms of high accuracy and efficiency, especially when compared with basic approaches.
\item We describe the \mlopt algorithm for PAQ planning which combines
logical optimization via model search and physical
optimization via batching and bandit resource allocation via runtime
introspection.
\item We describe an implementation of the \mlopt algorithm in Apache Spark, building on our earlier work on the MLbase architecture~\cite{Kraska13}.
\item We evaluate several points in the design space with respect to each
of our logical and physical optimizations, and demonstrate that proper selection of each can
dramatically improve both accuracy and efficiency.
\item We present experimental results on large, distributed datasets up to
terabytes in size, demonstrating that \mlopt converges to high quality PAQ
plans an order of magnitude faster than a simple PAQ planning strategy.
\end{itemize}
The remainder of this paper is organized as follows.
Section~\ref{sec:paq_planning} formally defines the PAQ planning problem, explains its connection to traditional database query optimization research, and introduces a standard baseline approach for the problem, and provides a
high-level overview of \mlopt. We next present details about \mlopt's three
main components in Section~\ref{sec:optimizations}, highlighting the design decisions
for each of these components. Section~\ref{sec:designeval} subsequently presents an
empirical study of this design space and a comparison with traditional methods for solving this problem. We then present results on a large-scale
evaluation of \mlopt in Section~\ref{sec:evaluation}, with each of \mlopt's three
components tuned based on the results of the previous section.
In Section~\ref{sec:related} we explore the relationship between PAQ planning and existing works related to supporting predictive and analytical workloads.
We conclude with Section~\ref{sec:futureworkconclusions}, which summarizes our work and
discusses future extensions to \mlopt.
\section{T{\normalsize{\textbf U}}PAQ Design Choices}
\label{sec:optimizations}
In this section, we examine the design choices available to the \mlopt planner.
As stated previously, we are targeting algorithms
that run on tens to thousands of nodes in commodity computing clusters, and training datasets
that fit comfortably into cluster memory---on the order of tens of gigabytes to
terabytes. Training of a single model to convergence on such a cluster is expected to
require tens to hundreds of passes through the training data, and may take on the order of minutes.
Moreover, with a multi-terabyte dataset, performing a sequential grid search
involving even just 100 model configurations each with a budget of 100 scans of the training data could take hours to days of processing time, even assuming that the algorithm runs at memory speed.
Hence, in this regime the baseline PAQ planner is tremendously costly.
Given the design choices presented in Section~\ref{sec:paq_planning}, we ask how these design choices might be optimized to provide fast, high quality PAQ planning.
In the remainder of this
section we present the following optimizations---advanced model search techniques, bandit resource allocation via
runtime algorithm introspection, and physical optimization via
batching---that in concert provide \mlopt with an order-of-magnitude gain in performance.
\subsection{Better Model Search}
We call the problem of finding the highest quality model from a space
of model families and their hyperparameters the \emph{model search} problem, and the solution to this problem is of central importance to \mlopt.
We view model search as an optimization problem over a potentially
non-smooth, non-convex function in high dimensional space, where it is
expensive to evaluate the function and for which we have no closed form
expression for the function to be optimized (and hence cannot compute
derivatives). Although grid search remains the standard solution to this problem, various alternatives have been proposed for the general problem
of derivative-free optimization, some of which are particularly tailored for
the model search problem. Each of these methods provides an opportunity to
speed up \mlopt's planning time, and in this section we provide a brief survey
of the most commonly used methods. In Section~\ref{sec:designeval} we
evaluate each method on several datasets to determine which method is most
suitable for PAQ planning.
Traditional methods for derivative-free optimization include grid search (the
baseline choice for a PAQ planner) as well as random search, Powell's method
\cite{powell1964efficient}, and the Nelder-Mead method \cite{Nelder:1965tk}.
Given a hyperparameter space, grid search
selects evenly spaced points (in linear or log space) from this space, while
random search samples points uniformly at random from this space.
Powell's method can be seen as a derivative-free analog to coordinate
descent, while
the Nelder-Mead method can be roughly interpreted as a derivative-free analog to
gradient descent.
Both Powell's method and the Nelder-Mead method expect unconstrained search
spaces, but function evaluations can be modified to severely penalize exploring
out of the search space. However, both methods require some degree of
smoothness in the hyperparameter space to work well, and can easily get stuck
in local minima. Additionally, neither method lends itself well to categorical
hyperparameters, since the function space is modeled as continuous. For these
reasons, we are unsurprised that they are inappropriate methods to use in the
model search problem where optimization is done over an unknown function that
is likely non-smooth and not convex.
More recently, various methods specifically for model search have been recently
introduced in the ML community, including Tree-based Parzen Estimators
(HyperOpt)~\cite{Bergstra:2011tj}, Sequential Model-based Algorithm Configuration (Auto-WEKA)~\cite{Thornton:2013ea} and Gaussian Process based methods, e.g.,
Spearmint~\cite{Snoek:2012vl}. These algorithms all share the property that they can
search over spaces which are nested (e.g. multiple model families) and accept
categorical hyperparameters (e.g. regularization method). HyperOpt begins with a
random search and then probabilistically samples from points with more promising
minima, Auto-WEKA builds a Random Forest model from observed hyperparameter results,
and Spearmint implements a Bayesian methods based on Gaussian Processes.
\subsection{Bandit Resource Allocation}
\label{ssec:bandit}
Models are not all created equal. In the context of model
search, typically only a fraction of the models are of high-quality,
with many of the
remaining models performing drastically worse. Under certain
assumptions, allocating resources among different model configurations can be
naturally framed as a multi-armed bandit problem~\cite{BubeckC12}. Indeed, assume we are given a
\emph{fixed set} of $k$ model configurations to evaluate, as in the case of
grid or random search, along with a fixed budget $B$. Then, each model can be
viewed as an `arm' and the model search problem can be cast as a $k$-armed
bandit problem with $T$ rounds. At each round we perform a single iteration of
a particular model configuration, and return a reward indicating
the quality of the updated model, e.g., validation accuracy. In such settings,
multi-armed bandit algorithms can be used to determine a scheduling policy to
efficiently allocate resources across the $k$ model configurations. Typically,
these algorithms keep a running score for each of the $k$ arms, and at each
iteration choose an arm as a function of the current scores.
\begin{algorithm}[]
\SetKwInOut{Input}{input}\SetKwInOut{Output}{output}
\Input{Models, History}
\Output{FinishedModels, History, Proposals}
Proposal $\gets$ []\;
FinishedModels $\gets$ []\;
bestModel = getBestFromHistory(History)\;
\For{m in models}{
history.append(m)\;
\uIf{fullyTrained(m)}{
FinishedModels.append(m)\;
}
\ElseIf{quality(m) $ * (1+\epsilon) > $ quality(bestModel)}{
proposals.append(m)\;
}
}
\Return(FinishedModels, History, Proposals);
\caption{The bandit allocation strategy used by \mlopt.}
\label{alg:bandit}
\end{algorithm}
Our setting differs from this standard setting in two crucial ways. First,
several of our search algorithms select model configurations to evaluate in an
iterative fashion, so we do not have advanced access to a fixed set of $k$
model configurations. Second, in addition to efficiently allocating resources,
we aim to return a reasonable result to a user as quickly as possible, and
hence there is a benefit to finish training promising model configurations once
they have been identified.
Our bandit selection strategy is a variant of the action elimination algorithm of \cite{EvenDar:2006tf}, and to our knowledge this is the first time this algorithm has been applied to hyperparameter tuning. Our strategy is
detailed in Algorithm~\ref{alg:bandit}. This strategy preemptively prunes
models that fail to show promise of converging. For each model
(or batch of models), we first allocate a fixed number of iterations for
training; in Algorithm~\ref{alg:mloptplanner} the trainPartial() function
trains each model for PartialIters iterations. Partially trained models are
fed into the bandit allocation algorithm, which determines whether to train the
model to completion by comparing the quality of these models to the quality of
the best model that has been trained to date. Moreover, this comparison is
performed using a slack factor of $(1+\epsilon)$; in our experiments we set
$\epsilon = .5$ and thus continue to train all models with quality
within $50\%$ of the best quality model observed so far.
The algorithm stops allocating further resources to models that fail this test,
as well as to models that have already been trained to completion.
\subsection{Batching}
\input{batching}
\section{PAQ Planning and T{\normalsize{\textbf U}}PAQ}
\label{sec:paq_planning}
In this section, we define the PAQ planning problem in more detail, and describe its relationship to traditional query optimization. Then, we discuss two approaches to PAQ planning.
The first, which we call the baseline approach, is inspired by common practice.
The second approach, \mlopt, allows us to take advantage of logical and physical optimizations in the planning process.
\mlopt has a rich design space, which we describe in further detail in Section~\ref{sec:optimizations}.
Finally, we describe how \mlopt fits into the broader MLbase architecture.
\subsection{Defining PAQ Planning}
Figure~\ref{fig:paq} shows several example PAQs that, in practice, need extremely large training datasets with millions of examples each with hundreds of thousands of features to return accurate results.
Other PAQs that need large training sets include problems in image classification,
speech-to-text translation, and web-scale text mining.
As defined in Section~\ref{sec:intro}, PAQs can be any query where an attribute or predicate value must be imputed to complete the query. In this work we concern ourselves specifically with PAQs that can be answered based on user-supplied labeled training data, typically of the same format as the data for which values are to be imputed.
We focus specifically on the components of the system that are necessary to efficiently support clauses of the form shown in Section~\ref{sec:intro}.
While the strategies discussed here can operate in situations where queries have joined relations or complex aggregates, we expect that future work will explore optimizations specific to these situations.
The PAQ planner's job is to find a PAQ plan that maximizes
some measure of quality (e.g., in terms of goodness of fit to held-out data) in a short amount of time, where learning time is constrained by
some budget in terms of the number of models considered, total
execution time, or the number of scans over the training data.
The planner thus takes as input a training dataset, a description of a space
of models to search, and some budget or stopping criterion. The description of
the space of models to search includes the set of model families to search over
(e.g., SVM, decision tree, etc.) and reasonable ranges for their associated
hyperparameters (e.g., regularization parameter for a regularized linear model
or maximum depth of a decision tree). The output of a PAQ Planner is a plan that can be applied to unlabeled
data points to obtain a prediction for the desired attribute. In the context of \mlopt, this plan is a statistical model that can be applied to unseen training data.
In this work, we operate in a scenario where individual models are of
dimensionality $d$, where $d$ is less than the total number of
example data points $N$. Note that $d$ can nonetheless be quite large, e.g.,
$d=200,000$ in our large-scale speech experiments and $d=160,000$ in our large scale image experiments (see Section~\ref{sec:evaluation}). Recall that in this paper, we focus on classification, and consider a small number of model families, $f \in F$,
each with several hyperparameters, $\lambda \in \Lambda$.
These assumptions map well to reality, as there are a handful of
general-purpose classification methods that are deployed in practice. Further, we expect that these techniques will naturally apply to other supervised learning tasks---such as regression and collaborative filtering, which may only differ in terms of their definition of plan quality.
We evaluate the quality of each plan by computing accuracy on
held-out datasets, and we measure learning time as the amount of time required
to explore a fixed number of models from some model space. In our large-scale
distributed experiments (see Section~\ref{sec:evaluation}) we report parallel run times.
Additionally, in this paper we focus on model families that are trained via multiple sequential scans of the training data. In particular, we focus
on three model families: linear Support Vector Machines (SVM), logistic regression trained via gradient descent, and nonlinear
SVMs using random features~\cite{RandomKitchenSink} trained via block coordinate descent.
This iterative sequential access pattern encompasses a wide
range of learning algorithms, especially in the large-scale distributed
setting. For instance, efficient distributed implementations of linear
regression~\cite{Franklin13}, tree based models~\cite{Panda:2009uh}, Naive
Bayes classifiers~\cite{Franklin13}, and $k$-means clustering~\cite{Franklin13}
all follow this same access pattern.
\subsection{Connections to Query Optimization}
Given that PAQ planning is the automation of a declaratively specified task, it is natural to draw connections to decades worth of relational query optimization research when
tackling the PAQ planning problem. Traditional database systems invest in
the costly process of query planning to determine a good execution plan that can
be reused repeatedly upon subsequent execution of similar queries.
While query planning for a PAQ involves the costly process of
identifying a high quality predictive model, this cost is offset by the subsequent
ability to perform near real-time PAQ evaluation. Additionally, both types
of query planning can be viewed as search problems, with traditional query
planning searching over the space of join orderings and access methods, and PAQ planning
searching over the space of machine learning models.
There are some notable differences between these two problems, however, leading
to a novel set of challenges to address in the context of PAQ planning.
First, unlike traditional database queries, PAQs do not have unique answers
due to the inherent uncertainty in predictive models learned from finite
datasets. Hence, PAQ planning focuses on both quality and efficiency
(compared to just efficiency for traditional query planning), and needs to
balance between these goals when they conflict. Second, the search space
for PAQs is not endowed with well-defined algebraic properties, as it
consists of possibly unrelated model families and feature extractors, each
with its own access patterns and hyperparameters. Third, evaluating a
candidate query plan is expensive and in this context involves learning
the parameters of a statistical model. Learning the parameters of a
single model can involve upwards of hundreds of passes over the input
data, and there exist few heuristics to estimate the effectiveness of a
model before this costly training process.
Now, we turn our attention to algorithms for PAQ planning.
\subsection{Baseline PAQ Planning}
The conventional
approach to PAQ planning is sequential grid search~\cite{graphlabgrid,scikitlearn,caret}. For instance, consider the
tag prediction example in Figure~\ref{fig:photos}, in which the PAQ is processed
via an underlying classification model trained on \texttt{LabeledPhotos}.
Moreover, consider a single ML model family for binary
classification---logistic regression---which has two hyperparameters: learning
rate and regularization. Sequential grid search divides the
hyperparameter space into a grid and iteratively trains models at these grid
points
Grid search has several shortcomings. First, the results of previous
iterations in the sequence of grid points are not used to inform future iterations of search. Second, the
curse of dimensionality limits the usefulness of this method in high
dimensional hyperparameter spaces. Third, grid points may not represent a good
approximation of global minima---true global minima may be hidden between grid
points, particularly in the case of a very coarse grid. Nonetheless, sequential grid search
is commonly used in practice, and is a natural baseline for PAQ planners.
In Algorithm~\ref{alg:naiveplanner}, we show the logic encapsulated in such a baseline PAQ planner.
In this example, the budget is the total number of models to train.
\begin{algorithm}[h]
\SetKwInOut{Input}{input}\SetKwInOut{Output}{output}
\Input{LabeledData, ModelSpace, Budget}
\Output{BestModel}
bestModel $\gets$ $\emptyset$\;
grid $\gets$ gridPoints(ModelSpace, Budget)\;
\While{Budget $>$ 0}{
proposal $\gets$ nextPoint(grid)\;
model $\gets$ train(proposal, LabeledData)\;
\If{quality(model) $>$ quality(bestModel)}
{bestModel $\gets$ model\;}
Budget $\gets$ Budget $-$ 1\;}
\Return{bestModel};
\caption{A baseline PAQ planning procedure with conventional grid search. The function ``gridPoints'' returns a coarse grid over the dimensions of model space, where the total number of grid points is determined by the budget.}
\label{alg:naiveplanner}
\end{algorithm}
\subsection{T{\normalsize{\textbf U}}PAQ Planning}
As discussed in the previous section, grid search is a suboptimal search method
despite its popularity. Moreover, from a systems perspective, the algorithm illustrated in
Algorithm~\ref{alg:naiveplanner}
has additional drawbacks beyond those of grid search. In
particular, this procedure performs sequential model training and also treats
the training of each model as a black-box procedure.
\begin{algorithm}[]
\SetKwInOut{Input}{input}\SetKwInOut{Output}{output}
\Input{LabeledData, ModelSpace, Budget, PartialIters, BatchSize}
\Output{BestModel}
bestModel $\gets$ $\emptyset$\;
history $\gets$ []\;
proposals $\gets$ []\;
freeSlots $\gets$ batchSize\;
\While{Budget $>$ 0}{
freeSlots $\gets$ batchSize - length(proposals)\;
proposals $\gets$ proposals + proposeModels(freeSlots, ModelSpace, history)\tcp*{Model Search}
models $\gets$ trainPartial(proposals, LabeledData, PartialIters)\tcp*{Batching}
Budget $\gets$ Budget $-$ len(models)$*$PartialIters\;
(finishedModels, history, proposals) $\gets$ banditAllocation(models, history)\tcp*{Bandits}
\For{m in finishedModels}{
\If{quality(m) $>$ quality(bestModel)}{
bestModel $\gets$ m\;
}
}
}
\Return(bestModel);
\caption{The planning procedure used by \mlopt.}
\label{alg:mloptplanner}
\end{algorithm}
In contrast, we propose the \mlopt algorithm, described in Algorithm~\ref{alg:mloptplanner}, to
address all three of these shortcomings via logical and physical optimizations.
First, the \mlopt algorithm allows for more \emph{sophisticated search strategies}.
Line 7 shows that our model search procedure can now use training history as
input. Here, ``proposeModel'' can be an arbitrary model search procedure.
Second, our algorithm performs \emph{batching} to train multiple models
simultaneously (Line 8). Third, our algorithm deploys \emph{bandit resource allocation via
runtime inspection} to make on-the-fly decisions. Specifically, the algorithm
compares the quality of the models currently being trained with historical
information about the training process, and determines which of the current
models should be trained further (Line 10).
These three optimizations are discussed in detail in Section~\ref{sec:optimizations}, with a focus on the design space for each of them.
In Section~\ref{sec:designeval} we then evaluate the options in this design
space experimentally, and then in Section~\ref{sec:evaluation} compare the
baseline algorithm (Algorithm \ref{alg:naiveplanner}) to \mlopt running with
good choices for search method, batch size, and bandit allocation criterion,
i.e., choices informed by the results of Section~\ref{sec:designeval}.
Before exploring the design space for the \mlopt algorithm, we first describe how \mlopt fits into a larger system to support PAQs.
\begin{figure}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.8\columnwidth]{figures/tupaqarch.pdf}
\caption{The \mlopt planner is a critical component of the MLbase~\protect\cite{Kraska13} system for simplified large scale machine learning. \mlopt interacts with a distributed run-time and existing machine learning algorithms to efficiently find a PAQ plan which yields high quality predictions.}
\label{fig:mlbarch}
\end{figure}
\subsection{T{\normalsize{\textbf U}}PAQ and the MLbase Architecture}
\mlopt lies at the heart of MLbase~\cite{Kraska13}, a novel system designed to simplify the process of implementing and using scalable machine learning techniques.
By giving users a declarative interface for machine learning tasks, the problem of hyperparameter tuning and feature selection can be pushed down into the system. The architecture of this system is shown in Figure~\ref{fig:mlbarch}.
At the center of the system, some optimizer or planner must be able to quickly identify a suitable model for supporting predictive queries.
We note that the system described in this paper introduces some key architectural differences compared with
the original MLbase architecture in \cite{Kraska13}.
In particular, we make the concept of a ``PAQ planner'' explicit, and introduce a catalog for PAQ plans.
When a new PAQ arrives, it is passed to the planner which determines whether a new PAQ plan needs to be created.
The entire system is built upon Apache Spark, a cluster compute system designed for iterative computing~\cite{Spark}, and we leverage MLlib, and other components present in Apache Spark, as well as MLI~\cite{MLI}.
\section{Related Work}
\label{sec:related}
There has been a recent proliferation of systems designed for low-level,
ad-hoc distributed predictive analytics, e.g., Apache Spark~\cite{Spark},
GraphLab~\cite{powergraph}, Stratosphere~\cite{Alexandrov:2014jb}, but none
of these provide users with a declarative interface with which to specify predictive queries.
In terms of system-level optimization, both Kumar et. al.~\cite{Kumar:2013vm}
and Canny et. al.~\cite{Canny:2013th} discuss batching as an optimization for
speeding up machine learning systems. However, \cite{Kumar:2013vm} discusses
this technique in the context of automatic feature selection, an important
problem but distinct from PAQ planning, while \cite{Canny:2013th} explores this
technique in the context of parameter exploration, model tuning,
ensemble methods and cross validation. We explore the impact of batching in a
distributed setting at greater depth in this work, and present a novel
application of this technique to the PAQ planning problem.
In the data mining and machine learning communities, most related to \mlopt is
Auto-WEKA \cite{Thornton:2013ea}. As the name suggests, Auto-WEKA aims to
automate the use of Weka~\cite{weka} by applying recent derivative-free
optimization algorithms, in particular Sequential Model-based Algorithm
Configuration (SMAC)~\cite{Hutter:2011wn}, to the PAQ planning problem. In
fact, their proposed algorithm is one of the many optimization algorithms we
use as part of \mlopt. However, in contrast to \mlopt, Auto-WEKA focuses on
single node performance and does not optimize the parallel execution of
algorithms. Moreover, Auto-WEKA treats algorithms as black boxes to be
executed and observed, while our system takes advantage of knowledge of
algorithm execution from both a statistical and physical perspective.
In addition to the SMAC algorithm of Auto-WEKA, other search algorithms have been recently been proposed. In
Bergstra et. al.~\cite{Bergstra:2012ux}, the effectiveness of random search for hyperparameter
tuning is established, while Bergstra et. al.~\cite{Bergstra:2011tj} proposes a search method
that performs a random search that is refined with new
information, called Tree-structured Parzen Estimation (TPE). We make use of both methods in our system.
Snoek et. al.~\cite{Snoek:2012vl} explore the use of Gaussian Processes for the
PAQ planning problem, and propose a variety of search algorithms, including an
algorithm that accounts for improvement per time unit, and another extension
targeting parallel implementations in which several new model configurations
are proposed at each iteration. However, model training is nonetheless
considered a black box, and moreover, we found that their algorithms,
collectively called Spearmint, often run for several minutes per iteration even
when considering a moderate number of candidate models, which is too long to be
practical in many scenarios.
In contrast to these recent works, the field of derivative-free optimization
has a long history of optimizing functions for which derivatives cannot be
computed~\cite{Conn:2009tl}. Our evaluation of these algorithms on the PAQ
planning problem suggests that they are not well-suited for this task,
potentially due to the lack of smoothness of the (unknown) PAQ planning
function that we are optimizing.
There are also several proprietary and open-source systems providing machine
learning functionality with varying degrees of automation. Google Predict
\cite{google_prediction} is Google's proprietary web-service for prediction
problems with some degree of automation, yet it restricts the maximum training
data-size to 250MB and the internals of the system are largely unknown.
Weka~\cite{weka}, MLlib~\cite{Franklin13}, Vowpal Wabbit~\cite{vwsgd}, Hyracks~\cite{Hyracks} and
Mahout~\cite{mahout} are notable open-source ML libraries. These systems (all distributed
with the exception of Weka),
along with proprietary projects such as SystemML~\cite{SystemML}, all focus on
training single models.
In contrast, \mlopt is designed explicitly for PAQ planning and hyperparameter
tuning at scale. In theory our proposed methods could work with these systems,
though such integration would require these systems to
expose the access patterns of the algorithms they make available to
\mlopt.
\section{Introduction}
The \textit{proceedings} are the records of a conference.
ACM seeks to give these conference by-products a uniform,
high-quality appearance. To do this, ACM has some rigid
requirements for the format of the proceedings documents: there
is a specified format (balanced double columns), a specified
set of fonts (Arial or Helvetica and Times Roman) in
certain specified sizes (for instance, 9 point for body copy),
a specified live area (18 $\times$ 23.5 cm [7" $\times$ 9.25"]) centered on
the page, specified size of margins (1.9 cm [0.75"]) top, (2.54 cm [1"]) bottom
and (1.9 cm [.75"]) left and right; specified column width
(8.45 cm [3.33"]) and gutter size (.83 cm [.33"]).
The good news is, with only a handful of manual
settings\footnote{Two of these, the {\texttt{\char'134 numberofauthors}}
and {\texttt{\char'134 alignauthor}} commands, you have
already used; another, {\texttt{\char'134 balancecolumns}}, will
be used in your very last run of \LaTeX\ to ensure
balanced column heights on the last page.}, the \LaTeX\ document
class file handles all of this for you.
The remainder of this document is concerned with showing, in
the context of an ``actual'' document, the \LaTeX\ commands
specifically available for denoting the structure of a
proceedings paper, rather than with giving rigorous descriptions
or explanations of such commands.
\section{The {\secit Body} of The Paper}
Typically, the body of a paper is organized
into a hierarchical structure, with numbered or unnumbered
headings for sections, subsections, sub-subsections, and even
smaller sections. The command \texttt{{\char'134}section} that
precedes this paragraph is part of such a
hierarchy.\footnote{This is the second footnote. It
starts a series of three footnotes that add nothing
informational, but just give an idea of how footnotes work
and look. It is a wordy one, just so you see
how a longish one plays out.} \LaTeX\ handles the numbering
and placement of these headings for you, when you use
the appropriate heading commands around the titles
of the headings. If you want a sub-subsection or
smaller part to be unnumbered in your output, simply append an
asterisk to the command name. Examples of both
numbered and unnumbered headings will appear throughout the
balance of this sample document.
Because the entire article is contained in
the \textbf{document} environment, you can indicate the
start of a new paragraph with a blank line in your
input file; that is why this sentence forms a separate paragraph.
\subsection{Type Changes and {\subsecit Special} Characters}
We have already seen several typeface changes in this sample. You
can indicate italicized words or phrases in your text with
the command \texttt{{\char'134}textit}; emboldening with the
command \texttt{{\char'134}textbf}
and typewriter-style (for instance, for computer code) with
\texttt{{\char'134}texttt}. But remember, you do not
have to indicate typestyle changes when such changes are
part of the \textit{structural} elements of your
article; for instance, the heading of this subsection will
be in a sans serif\footnote{A third footnote, here.
Let's make this a rather short one to
see how it looks.} typeface, but that is handled by the
document class file. Take care with the use
of\footnote{A fourth, and last, footnote.}
the curly braces in typeface changes; they mark
the beginning and end of
the text that is to be in the different typeface.
You can use whatever symbols, accented characters, or
non-English characters you need anywhere in your document;
you can find a complete list of what is
available in the \textit{\LaTeX\
User's Guide}\cite{Lamport:LaTeX}.
\subsection{Math Equations}
You may want to display math equations in three distinct styles:
inline, numbered or non-numbered display. Each of
the three are discussed in the next sections.
\subsubsection{Inline (In-text) Equations}
A formula that appears in the running text is called an
inline or in-text formula. It is produced by the
\textbf{math} environment, which can be
invoked with the usual \texttt{{\char'134}begin. . .{\char'134}end}
construction or with the short form \texttt{\$. . .\$}. You
can use any of the symbols and structures,
from $\alpha$ to $\omega$, available in
\LaTeX\cite{Lamport:LaTeX}; this section will simply show a
few examples of in-text equations in context. Notice how
this equation: \begin{math}\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}x=0\end{math},
set here in in-line math style, looks slightly different when
set in display style. (See next section).
\subsubsection{Display Equations}
A numbered display equation -- one set off by vertical space
from the text and centered horizontally -- is produced
by the \textbf{equation} environment. An unnumbered display
equation is produced by the \textbf{displaymath} environment.
Again, in either environment, you can use any of the symbols
and structures available in \LaTeX; this section will just
give a couple of examples of display equations in context.
First, consider the equation, shown as an inline equation above:
\begin{equation}\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}x=0\end{equation}
Notice how it is formatted somewhat differently in
the \textbf{displaymath}
environment. Now, we'll enter an unnumbered equation:
\begin{displaymath}\sum_{i=0}^{\infty} x + 1\end{displaymath}
and follow it with another numbered equation:
\begin{equation}\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}x_i=\int_{0}^{\pi+2} f\end{equation}
just to demonstrate \LaTeX's able handling of numbering.
\subsection{Citations}
Citations to articles \cite{bowman:reasoning,
clark:pct, braams:babel, herlihy:methodology},
conference proceedings \cite{clark:pct} or
books \cite{salas:calculus, Lamport:LaTeX} listed
in the Bibliography section of your
article will occur throughout the text of your article.
You should use BibTeX to automatically produce this bibliography;
you simply need to insert one of several citation commands with
a key of the item cited in the proper location in
the \texttt{.tex} file \cite{Lamport:LaTeX}.
The key is a short reference you invent to uniquely
identify each work; in this sample document, the key is
the first author's surname and a
word from the title. This identifying key is included
with each item in the \texttt{.bib} file for your article.
The details of the construction of the \texttt{.bib} file
are beyond the scope of this sample document, but more
information can be found in the \textit{Author's Guide},
and exhaustive details in the \textit{\LaTeX\ User's
Guide}\cite{Lamport:LaTeX}.
This article shows only the plainest form
of the citation command, using \texttt{{\char'134}cite}.
This is what is stipulated in the SIGS style specifications.
No other citation format is endorsed or supported.
\subsection{Tables}
Because tables cannot be split across pages, the best
placement for them is typically the top of the page
nearest their initial cite. To
ensure this proper ``floating'' placement of tables, use the
environment \textbf{table} to enclose the table's contents and
the table caption. The contents of the table itself must go
in the \textbf{tabular} environment, to
be aligned properly in rows and columns, with the desired
horizontal and vertical rules. Again, detailed instructions
on \textbf{tabular} material
is found in the \textit{\LaTeX\ User's Guide}.
Immediately following this sentence is the point at which
Table 1 is included in the input file; compare the
placement of the table here with the table in the printed
dvi output of this document.
\begin{table}
\centering
\caption{Frequency of Special Characters}
\begin{tabular}{|c|c|l|} \hline
Non-English or Math&Frequency&Comments\\ \hline
\O & 1 in 1,000& For Swedish names\\ \hline
$\pi$ & 1 in 5& Common in math\\ \hline
\$ & 4 in 5 & Used in business\\ \hline
$\Psi^2_1$ & 1 in 40,000& Unexplained usage\\
\hline\end{tabular}
\end{table}
To set a wider table, which takes up the whole width of
the page's live area, use the environment
\textbf{table*} to enclose the table's contents and
the table caption. As with a single-column table, this wide
table will ``float" to a location deemed more desirable.
Immediately following this sentence is the point at which
Table 2 is included in the input file; again, it is
instructive to compare the placement of the
table here with the table in the printed dvi
output of this document.
\begin{table*}
\centering
\caption{Some Typical Commands}
\begin{tabular}{|c|c|l|} \hline
Command&A Number&Comments\\ \hline
\texttt{{\char'134}alignauthor} & 100& Author alignment\\ \hline
\texttt{{\char'134}numberofauthors}& 200& Author enumeration\\ \hline
\texttt{{\char'134}table}& 300 & For tables\\ \hline
\texttt{{\char'134}table*}& 400& For wider tables\\ \hline\end{tabular}
\end{table*}
\subsection{Figures}
Like tables, figures cannot be split across pages; the
best placement for them
is typically the top or the bottom of the page nearest
their initial cite. To ensure this proper ``floating'' placement
of figures, use the environment
\textbf{figure} to enclose the figure and its caption.
This sample document contains examples of \textbf{.eps}
and \textbf{.ps} files to be displayable with \LaTeX. More
details on each of these is found in the \textit{Author's Guide}.
\begin{figure}
\centering
\epsfig{file=fly.eps}
\caption{A sample black and white graphic (.eps format).}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure}
\centering
\epsfig{file=fly.eps, height=1in, width=1in}
\caption{A sample black and white graphic (.eps format)
that has been resized with the \texttt{epsfig} command.}
\end{figure}
As was the case with tables, you may want a figure
that spans two columns. To do this, and still to
ensure proper ``floating'' placement of tables, use the environment
\textbf{figure*} to enclose the figure and its caption.
and don't forget to end the environment with
{figure*}, not {figure}!
\begin{figure*}
\centering
\epsfig{file=flies.eps}
\caption{A sample black and white graphic (.eps format)
that needs to span two columns of text.}
\end{figure*}
Note that either {\textbf{.ps}} or {\textbf{.eps}} formats are
used; use
the \texttt{{\char'134}epsfig} or \texttt{{\char'134}psfig}
commands as appropriate for the different file types.
\begin{figure}
\centering
\psfig{file=rosette.ps, height=1in, width=1in,}
\caption{A sample black and white graphic (.ps format) that has
been resized with the \texttt{psfig} command.}
\vskip -6pt
\end{figure}
\subsection{Theorem-like Constructs}
Other common constructs that may occur in your article are
the forms for logical constructs like theorems, axioms,
corollaries and proofs. There are
two forms, one produced by the
command \texttt{{\char'134}newtheorem} and the
other by the command \texttt{{\char'134}newdef}; perhaps
the clearest and easiest way to distinguish them is
to compare the two in the output of this sample document:
This uses the \textbf{theorem} environment, created by
the\linebreak\texttt{{\char'134}newtheorem} command:
\newtheorem{theorem}{Theorem}
\begin{theorem}
Let $f$ be continuous on $[a,b]$. If $G$ is
an antiderivative for $f$ on $[a,b]$, then
\begin{displaymath}\int^b_af(t)dt = G(b) - G(a).\end{displaymath}
\end{theorem}
The other uses the \textbf{definition} environment, created
by the \texttt{{\char'134}newdef} command:
\newdef{definition}{Definition}
\begin{definition}
If $z$ is irrational, then by $e^z$ we mean the
unique number which has
logarithm $z$: \begin{displaymath}{\log e^z = z}\end{displaymath}
\end{definition}
Two lists of constructs that use one of these
forms is given in the
\textit{Author's Guidelines}.
There is one other similar construct environment, which is
already set up
for you; i.e. you must \textit{not} use
a \texttt{{\char'134}newdef} command to
create it: the \textbf{proof} environment. Here
is a example of its use:
\begin{proof}
Suppose on the contrary there exists a real number $L$ such that
\begin{displaymath}
\lim_{x\rightarrow\infty} \frac{f(x)}{g(x)} = L.
\end{displaymath}
Then
\begin{displaymath}
l=\lim_{x\rightarrow c} f(x)
= \lim_{x\rightarrow c}
\left[ g{x} \cdot \frac{f(x)}{g(x)} \right ]
= \lim_{x\rightarrow c} g(x) \cdot \lim_{x\rightarrow c}
\frac{f(x)}{g(x)} = 0\cdot L = 0,
\end{displaymath}
which contradicts our assumption that $l\neq 0$.
\end{proof}
Complete rules about using these environments and using the
two different creation commands are in the
\textit{Author's Guide}; please consult it for more
detailed instructions. If you need to use another construct,
not listed therein, which you want to have the same
formatting as the Theorem
or the Definition\cite{salas:calculus} shown above,
use the \texttt{{\char'134}newtheorem} or the
\texttt{{\char'134}newdef} command,
respectively, to create it.
\subsection*{A {\secit Caveat} for the \TeX\ Expert}
Because you have just been given permission to
use the \texttt{{\char'134}newdef} command to create a
new form, you might think you can
use \TeX's \texttt{{\char'134}def} to create a
new command: \textit{Please refrain from doing this!}
Remember that your \LaTeX\ source code is primarily intended
to create camera-ready copy, but may be converted
to other forms -- e.g. HTML. If you inadvertently omit
some or all of the \texttt{{\char'134}def}s recompilation will
be, to say the least, problematic.
\section{Conclusions}
This paragraph will end the body of this sample document.
Remember that you might still have Acknowledgments or
Appendices; brief samples of these
follow. There is still the Bibliography to deal with; and
we will make a disclaimer about that here: with the exception
of the reference to the \LaTeX\ book, the citations in
this paper are to articles which have nothing to
do with the present subject and are used as
examples only.
\section{Acknowledgments}
This section is optional; it is a location for you
to acknowledge grants, funding, editing assistance and
what have you. In the present case, for example, the
authors would like to thank Gerald Murray of ACM for
his help in codifying this \textit{Author's Guide}
and the \textbf{.cls} and \textbf{.tex} files that it describes.
\bibliographystyle{abbrv}
|
\section{Introduction}
Supersymmetry (SUSY) is a proposed symmetry of nature that introduces
a bosonic (fermionic) partner for every standard model (SM) fermion
(boson)~\cite{Wess,Golfand,Volkov,Chamseddine,Kane,Fayet,Barbieri,Hall,Ramond}. Supersymmetric
extensions of the SM that include a stable new particle at the
electroweak scale are well motivated because they may explain the
origin of dark matter. The discovery of the Higgs
boson~\cite{ATLAShiggs, CMShiggs, CMShiggslong} at the CERN LHC has
renewed interest in ``natural'' SUSY models, which minimize the
fine-tuning associated with the observed value of the Higgs boson mass
due to its radiative corrections. In the typical spectrum of these
models, the lightest neutralino and chargino are the lightest (LSP)
and next-to-lightest (NLSP) SUSY particles,
respectively~\cite{deCarlos:1993yy,Anderson:1994dz,Kitano:2005wc,Asano:2010ut,Strumia:2011dv,naturalSUSY}.
Charginos and neutralinos are fermions, corresponding to a quantum
mixture of the SUSY partners of the electroweak and Higgs bosons. The
bottom and top squarks are the lightest squarks. The gluino is heavier
than these particles but potentially accessible at the LHC. Events are
thus characterized by an abundance of jets originating from the
hadronization of bottom quarks, a feature that we exploit in this
study. Previous searches for natural SUSY by the
CMS~\cite{1LepMVA,SUS12024,Chatrchyan:2014lfa,Chatrchyan:2013iqa,Chatrchyan:2013fea}
and ATLAS
Collaborations~\cite{Aad:2013wta,Aad:2014lra,Aad:2014pda,Aad:2014bva,Aad:2014qaa}
at the LHC have probed gluino masses up to 1300\GeV and top squark
masses up to 700\GeV under the assumptions of specific decay modes for
the SUSY particles.
We present an inclusive search for gluinos and top squarks in the
context of natural SUSY. Natural SUSY spectra include a gluino, the
third-generation squarks, a chargino, and a neutralino, representing
the minimum particle content needed in SUSY theories to
stabilize the Higgs boson mass. Within the context of natural SUSY,
several simplified
models~\cite{ArkaniHamed:2007fw,Alwall:2008ag,Alwall:2008va,Alves:2011sq,Alves:2011wf,Graesser:2012qy}
are considered (Section~\ref{sec:sms}), defined by a specific
production mechanism of SUSY particle pairs, with at most two decay
channels for each production mode.
The search is performed using events with two or more jets, at least
one of which is identified as originating from a bottom quark (jet b
tagging). The study is based on the data collected by the CMS
Collaboration in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}=8\TeV$ in 2012,
corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 19.3\fbinv. We
distinguish the signal from the SM background through their different
shapes in the razor variables \ensuremath{M_\mathrm{R}}\xspace and $\ensuremath{\mathrm{R}^2}\xspace$~\cite{rogan,razor2010}.
This search extends the results we presented at
7\TeV~\cite{razorPRL,razorPRD} using the same analysis procedure. The
razor variables have also been used by the ATLAS Collaboration to
perform a multi-channel search for SUSY at 7\TeV~\cite{Aad:2012naa}.
The razor variables \ensuremath{M_\mathrm{R}}\xspace and \ensuremath{\mathrm{R}^2}\xspace are motivated by the generic process of the pair production of two
heavy particles (e.g., squarks or gluinos), each decaying to an
undetected particle (the stable, weakly interacting LSP $\chiz_1$)
plus visible particles. The LSP is assumed to escape without
detection, leading to an imbalance $\ptvecmiss$ in the momentum
perpendicular to the beam axis. Each event is treated as a dijet-like event
and the four-momenta of the two jets are used to compute \ensuremath{M_\mathrm{R}}\xspace and $\ensuremath{M_\mathrm{T}^\mathrm{R}}\xspace$, defined as
\begin{align}
\label{eq:MRstar}
\ensuremath{M_\mathrm{R}}\xspace &\equiv
\sqrt{
(\abs{\vec{p}^{j_{1}}}+\abs{\vec{p}^{j_{2}}})^2 -({p}^{j_1}_z+{p}^{j_2}_z)^2},\\
\ensuremath{M_\mathrm{T}^\mathrm{R}}\xspace &\equiv \sqrt{ \frac{\ETm(\pt^{j_1}+\pt^{j_2}) -
\ptvecmiss \cdot
(\ptvec^{\,j_1}+\ptvec^{\,j_2}) }{2}},
\end{align}
where $\vec{p}_{j_i}$, $\ptvec^{\,j_i}$, and
$p^{j_i}_z$ are the momentum of the $i$th jet, its
transverse component with respect to the beam axis, and its
longitudinal component, respectively, with $\ETm$ the magnitude of $\ptvecmiss$. While
$\ensuremath{M_\mathrm{T}^\mathrm{R}}\xspace$ quantifies the transverse momentum imbalance,
$\ensuremath{M_\mathrm{R}}\xspace$ estimates the mass scale of new-physics particle
production in the event. The razor dimensionless ratio is defined as
\begin{equation}
\ensuremath{\mathrm{R}}\xspace \equiv \frac{\ensuremath{M_\mathrm{T}^\mathrm{R}}\xspace}{\ensuremath{M_\mathrm{R}}\xspace}.
\end{equation}
In this search, each event is reduced to a two-jet topology by
clustering the selected objects (jets and leptons) into two megajets~\cite{razor2010,razorPRL,razorPRD}.
All possible assignments of objects to the megajets are considered,
with the requirement that a megajet consist of at least one
object. The sum of the four-momenta of the objects assigned to a
megajet defines the megajet four-momentum. When more than two objects
are reconstructed, more than one megajet assignment is possible. We
select the assignment that minimizes the sum of the
invariant masses of the two megajets.
The analysis is performed on several exclusive data sets, referred to
as razor boxes, differing in the lepton and jet
multiplicity. Each box with fewer than two identified leptons
(electrons or muons) is analyzed in exclusive \PQb-tagged jet multiplicity bins in order to
maximize the sensitivity to both direct and cascade production of
third-generation squarks. For a given box and \PQb-tagged jet
multiplicity, the shape of the SM background distribution is evaluated
in two rectangular
regions of the ($\ensuremath{M_\mathrm{R}}\xspace$, $\ensuremath{\mathrm{R}^2}\xspace$) plane (sidebands),
selected so that potential bias due to contributions from signal
events is negligible. The background shape is then extrapolated to the
signal-sensitive region of the ($\ensuremath{M_\mathrm{R}}\xspace$, $\ensuremath{\mathrm{R}^2}\xspace$)
plane. The results are interpreted in the context of several SUSY simplified
models by performing a hypothesis test. The test compares the
background-only and signal-plus-background possibilities
through simultaneous examination of the data in the two sidebands and the signal-sensitive
region~\cite{LHCCLs}.
In addition, we combine the results from the razor boxes
with those from our previous search~\cite{1LepMVA} for top-squark
production in the single-lepton (electron or muon) channel to obtain
an improved bound on top-squark pair production with respect to
previous CMS studies. For this combination, only the razor boxes
without an identified lepton (hadronic boxes) are used, so that the
event samples from the two studies are mutually exclusive.
This paper is organized as follows. Section~\ref{sec:sms} presents
the spectra of the simplified natural SUSY models
examined in this analysis. The CMS detector is briefly described in
Section~\ref{sec:cms}. The event selection and razor variables are
defined in Sections~\ref{sec:selection} and~\ref{sec:razVar},
respectively. The statistical model used to describe the SM
backgrounds as well as the comparisons between the predicted and observed
event yields in the search regions are shown in Section~\ref{sec:bmodel},
followed by a summary of the limit-setting procedure in
Section~\ref{sec:limit}. The interpretation of the results and a summary are presented
in Sections~\ref{sec:interp} and~\ref{sec:conclusion}, respectively.
\section{Simplified natural SUSY models}
\label{sec:sms}
\begin{figure}[htb!]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=\cmsFigWidth]{naturalSpectrum.pdf}
\caption{\label{fig:spectrum} The simplified natural SUSY spectrum
considered in this paper, along with the assumed decay modes.}
\end{figure}
In this paper, natural simplified SUSY scenarios are used to interpret
results. The LSP is the lightest neutralino $\chiz_1$ while the NLSP
is the lightest chargino $\chipm_1$. They are both higgsinos and
their mass splitting is taken to be 5\GeV. The NLSP decays to the LSP
and a virtual $\PW$ boson ($\chipm_1 \to \PW^{\ast} \chiz_1$). The
other SUSY particles accessible at the LHC are the gluino and the
lightest top and bottom squarks. All other SUSY particles are
assumed to be too heavy to participate in the interactions. The SUSY
particles and their possible decay modes within this natural SUSY
spectrum are summarized in Fig.~\ref{fig:spectrum}.
In the context of this natural spectrum, five simplified
models~\cite{ArkaniHamed:2007fw,Alwall:2008ag,Alwall:2008va,Alves:2011sq,Alves:2011wf,Graesser:2012qy}
are considered for gluino pair production, based on three-body gluino decays~\cite{SUS-11-016}:
\begin{itemize}
\item \textbf{ T1bbbb}: pair-produced gluinos, each decaying with a 100\%
branching fraction to a bottom quark-antiquark ($\bbbar$) pair and the LSP;
\item \textbf{ T1tbbb}: pair-produced gluinos, each decaying with a
50\% branching fraction to a $\bbbar$ pair and the LSP or to a
top quark (antiquark), a bottom antiquark (quark), and the NLSP;
\item \textbf{ T1ttbb}: pair-produced gluinos, decaying with a 100\%
branching fraction to a top quark (antiquark), a bottom antiquark (quark), and the NLSP;
\item \textbf{ T1tttb}: pair-produced gluinos, each decaying with a
50\% branching fraction to a top quark-antiquark ($\ttbar$) pair and the LSP or to a top
quark (antiquark), a bottom antiquark (quark), and the NLSP;
\item \textbf{ T1tttt}: pair-produced gluinos, each decaying with a 100\%
branching fraction to a $\ttbar$ pair and the LSP.
\end{itemize}
The corresponding Feynman diagrams are shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:SMSGluinoTopology}.
\begin{figure*}[thb!]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.32\textwidth]{T1bbbb.pdf}
\includegraphics[width=0.32\textwidth]{T1tbbb.pdf}
\includegraphics[width=0.32\textwidth]{T1ttbb.pdf} \\
\includegraphics[width=0.32\textwidth]{T1tttb.pdf}
\includegraphics[width=0.32\textwidth]{T1tttt.pdf} \\
\includegraphics[width=0.32\textwidth]{T2bw.pdf}
\includegraphics[width=0.32\textwidth]{T2tb.pdf}
\includegraphics[width=0.32\textwidth]{T2tt.pdf}
\caption{Diagrams displaying the event topologies of gluino (upper 5
diagrams) and top-squark (lower 3 diagrams) pair production
considered in this paper.\label{fig:SMSGluinoTopology}}
\end{figure*}
In addition, the following three simplified models are considered for
the production of top-squark pairs:
\begin{itemize}
\item \textbf{ T2bW$^{\ast}$}: pair-produced top squarks, each decaying
with a 100\% branching fraction to a bottom quark and the NLSP;
\item \textbf{ T2tb}: pair-produced top squarks, each decaying with a 50\%
branching fraction to a top quark and the LSP or to a bottom quark and
the NLSP;
\item \textbf{ T2tt}: pair-produced top squarks, each decaying with a
100\% branching fraction to a top quark and the LSP.
\end{itemize}
The corresponding Feynman diagrams are shown in
Fig.~\ref{fig:SMSGluinoTopology}.
Events for the eight simplified models are generated with the
\MADGRAPH V5 generator~\cite{Alwall:2011uj,Alwall:2014hca}, in
association with up to two partons. The SUSY particle decays are
treated with \PYTHIA V6.4.26 assuming a constant matrix element
(phase space decay). The parton showering is described by \PYTHIA and matched
to the matrix element kinematic configuration using the MLM
algorithm~\cite{Hoche:2006ph}, before being processed through a fast
simulation of the CMS detector~\cite{FastSim}. The SUSY
particle production cross sections are calculated to next-to-leading
order (NLO) plus next-to-leading-logarithm (NLL)
accuracy~\cite{NLONLL1,NLONLL2,NLONLL3,NLONLL4,NLONLL5}, assuming all
SUSY particles other than those in the relevant diagram to be too
heavy to participate in the interaction. The NLO+NLL cross section and
its associated uncertainty~\cite{NLONLLerr} are taken as a
reference to derive the exclusion limit on the SUSY particle masses.
\section{The CMS detector}
\label{sec:cms}
The central feature of the CMS detector is a
superconducting solenoid of 6\unit{m} internal diameter, providing a
magnetic field of 3.8\unit{T}. Within the superconducting solenoid
volume are a silicon pixel and a silicon strip tracker, a
lead-tungstate crystal electromagnetic calorimeter, and a
brass/scintillator hadron calorimeter, each composed of a barrel and
two endcap sections. Muons are measured in gas-ionization detectors
embedded in the magnet steel flux-return yoke outside the
solenoid. Extensive forward calorimetry complements the coverage
provided by the barrel and endcap detectors. Jets and leptons are
reconstructed within the pseudorapidity region $\abs{\eta}<3$, covered by the
electromagnetic and hadron calorimeters. Muons are reconstructed with
$\abs{\eta}<2.4$. Events are selected by a
two-level trigger system. The first level (L1) is based on a hardware
filter, followed by a software-based high level trigger (HLT). A more
detailed description of the CMS detector, together with a definition
of the coordinate system used and the relevant kinematic variables,
can be found in Ref.~\cite{Adolphi:2008zzk}.
\section{Event selection}
\label{sec:selection}
Events are selected at the L1 trigger level by requiring at least two
jets with $|\eta|<3$. At the HLT level, events are selected using
dedicated razor algorithms, consisting of a loose selection on \ensuremath{M_\mathrm{R}}\xspace and
$\ensuremath{\mathrm{R}^2}\xspace$. Razor-specific triggers are used in the HLT in order to avoid
biases on the shapes of distributions from the SM background that are
introduced by requirements on more traditional selection variables
such as $\ETm$. The razor triggers reject the majority of the SM
background, which mostly appears at low \ensuremath{\mathrm{R}^2}\xspace and low $\ensuremath{M_\mathrm{R}}\xspace$, while
retaining events in the signal-sensitive regions of the ($\ensuremath{M_\mathrm{R}}\xspace$,
$\ensuremath{\mathrm{R}^2}\xspace$) plane. Two types of triggers are used: i) a hadronic razor
trigger, which selects events that contain at least two jets with
transverse momentum $\pt>64\GeV$ by applying threshold requirements on
$\ensuremath{\mathrm{R}^2}\xspace$, $\ensuremath{M_\mathrm{R}}\xspace$, and their product; ii) a muon and electron razor
trigger, which selects events with at least one isolated electron or
muon with $\pt>12\GeV$ in combination with looser requirements on
$\ensuremath{\mathrm{R}^2}\xspace$, $\ensuremath{M_\mathrm{R}}\xspace$, and their product. The trigger efficiency, evaluated
using a dedicated trigger, is measured to be $(95 \pm 5)\%$ and is
independent of \ensuremath{\mathrm{R}^2}\xspace and $\ensuremath{M_\mathrm{R}}\xspace$ for the events selected with the
baseline requirements described in Section~\ref{sec:razVar}.
Following the trigger selection, events are required to contain at
least one reconstructed interaction vertex. If more than one vertex is
found, the one with the highest $\pt^2$ sum of associated tracks is
chosen as the interaction point for event reconstruction. Algorithms are
used to remove events with detector- and beam-related noise that can
mimic event topologies with high energy and large $\pt$
imbalance~\cite{Chatrchyan:2011tn,Chatrchyan:2012lia,Khachatryan:2014gga}.
The analysis uses a global event description based on the CMS particle
flow (PF) algorithm~\cite{PF1,PF2}. Individual particles (PF
candidates) are reconstructed by combining the information from the inner
tracker, the calorimeters, and the muon system. Five categories of PF
candidates are defined: muons, electrons, photons (including their
conversions to $\Pep\Pem$ pairs), charged hadrons, and neutral
hadrons. The contamination from other proton-proton collisions in the
same or in neighboring bunch crossings is reduced by discarding the
charged PF candidates not compatible with the interaction point. When
computing lepton isolation and jet energy, the corresponding
contamination from neutral particles is subtracted on average by
applying an event-by-event correction based on the jet-area
method~\cite{jetarea_fastjet,jetarea_fastjet_pu,JME-JINST}.
A ``tight'' lepton identification is used for muons and electrons,
consisting of requirements on isolation and track reconstruction
quality. For electrons, the shape and position of the energy deposit
in the electromagnetic calorimeter is used to further reduce the contamination from
hadrons~\cite{Chatrchyan:2013iaa}. For events with one identified
tight lepton, additional muons or electrons are identified through a
``loose'' lepton selection, characterized by a relaxed isolation
requirement~\cite{Chatrchyan:2013mxa}. Tight leptons are
required to have $\pt>15$\GeV and loose leptons $\pt>10$\GeV.
Jets are reconstructed by clustering the PF candidates with the
\textsc{FastJet}~\cite{fastjet} implementation of the anti-\kt~\cite{antikt} algorithm with the distance parameter $R=0.5$. We
select events containing at least two jets with $\pt>80$\GeV and
$\abs{\eta}<2.4$, representing a tighter version of the L1 jet selection criterion. The $\pt$
imbalance in the event, $\ptvecmiss$, is the
negative of the sum of the $\ptvec$ of the PF candidates in the
event. Its magnitude is referred to as $\ETm$. For each event, the $\ptvecmiss$ and the
four-momenta of all the jets with $\pt>40$\GeV and $\abs{\eta}<2.4$ are
used to compute the razor variables, as described in
Section~\ref{sec:razVar}.
The medium working point of the combined secondary vertex
algorithm~\cite{btag8TeV} is used for b-jet tagging. The \PQb-tagging
efficiency and mistag probability are measured from data control
samples as a function of the jet $\pt$ and $\eta$. Correction factors
are derived for Monte Carlo (MC) simulations through comparison of the
measured and simulated \PQb-tagging efficiencies and mistag rates found
in these control samples~\cite{btag8TeV}.
Events with no \PQb-tagged jet are discarded, a criterion motivated by
the natural SUSY signatures described in Section~\ref{sec:sms}. A tighter
requirement ($\geq$2 \PQb-tagged jets) is imposed on events without an
identified tight lepton and fewer than four jets. This requirement reduces the
expected background from SM production of $\cPZ(\to\nu\bar\nu)$+jets
events to a negligible level.
\section{Box definitions}
\label{sec:razVar}
The selected events are categorized into the different razor boxes according to
their event content as shown in Table~\ref{tab:boxDef}. In the table,
the boxes are listed according to the filling order, from the first
(at the top of the table) to the last (at the bottom). If an event
satisfies the requirements of two or more boxes, the event is assigned
to the first listed box to ensure the boxes correspond to disjoint samples.
The events in the single-lepton and two-lepton boxes are recorded
using the electron and muon razor trigger. The remaining two boxes, generically
referred to as ``hadronic'' boxes, contain events recorded using the
hadronic razor trigger.
In the two-lepton boxes, the ($\ensuremath{M_\mathrm{R}}\xspace$, $\ensuremath{\mathrm{R}^2}\xspace$)
distribution of events with at least one \PQb-tagged jet is studied. For
the other boxes, the data are binned according to the \PQb-tagged jet
multiplicity: 1 \PQb-tag, 2 \PQb-tags, and $\geq$3 \PQb-tags.
\begin{table*}[ht!]
\centering
\topcaption{Kinematic and multiplicity requirements defining the nine
razor boxes. Boxes are listed in order of event filling priority.
\label{tab:boxDef}}
\resizebox{\textwidth}{!}{
\begin{scotch}{ccccc}
Box & Lepton & \PQb-tag & Kinematic & Jet \\
\hline
\multicolumn{5}{c}{Two-lepton boxes}\\
\hline
\multirow{2}{*}{MuEle} & $\geq$1 tight electron and & \multirow{6}{*}{$\geq$1 \PQb-tag} & \multirow{2}{*}{} & \multirow{6}{*}{$\geq$2 jets}\\
& $\geq$1 loose muon & & & \\
\cline{1-2}
\multirow{2}{*}{MuMu} & $\geq$1 tight muon and & & ($\ensuremath{M_\mathrm{R}}\xspace >300$\GeV and $\ensuremath{\mathrm{R}^2}\xspace > 0.15$) and & \\
& $\geq$1 loose muon & & ($\ensuremath{M_\mathrm{R}}\xspace > 350$\GeV or $\ensuremath{\mathrm{R}^2}\xspace > 0.2$) & \\
\cline{1-2}
\multirow{2}{*}{EleEle} & $\geq$1 tight electron and & & & \\
& $\geq$1 loose electron& & & \\
\hline
\multicolumn{5}{c}{Single-lepton boxes}\\
\hline
MuMultiJet & 1 tight muon & \multirow{4}{*}{$\geq$1 \PQb-tag} & & \multirow{2}{*}{$\geq$4 jets} \\
EleMultiJet &1 tight electron & & ($\ensuremath{M_\mathrm{R}}\xspace > 300$\GeV and $\ensuremath{\mathrm{R}^2}\xspace > 0.15$) and & \\
\cline{5-5}
MuJet & 1 tight muon & & ($\ensuremath{M_\mathrm{R}}\xspace > 350$\GeV or $\ensuremath{\mathrm{R}^2}\xspace > 0.2$) & \multirow{2}{*}{2 or 3 jets}\\
EleJet & 1 tight electron & & & \\
\hline
\multicolumn{5}{c}{Hadronic boxes}\\
\hline
MultiJet & none & $\geq$1 \PQb-tag & ($\ensuremath{M_\mathrm{R}}\xspace > 400$\GeV and $\ensuremath{\mathrm{R}^2}\xspace > 0.25$) and &$\geq$4 jets\\
$\geq$2 \PQb-tagged jet & none & $\geq$2 \PQb-tag & ($\ensuremath{M_\mathrm{R}}\xspace > 450$\GeV or $\ensuremath{\mathrm{R}^2}\xspace > 0.3$) & 2 or 3 jets\\
\end{scotch}}
\end{table*}
A baseline kinematic requirement is applied to define the region in
which we search for a signal:
\begin{itemize}
\item $\ensuremath{M_\mathrm{R}}\xspace>400$\GeV and $\ensuremath{\mathrm{R}^2}\xspace>0.25$ for the hadronic boxes;
\item $\ensuremath{M_\mathrm{R}}\xspace>300$\GeV and $\ensuremath{\mathrm{R}^2}\xspace>0.15$ for the other boxes.
\end{itemize}
The tighter baseline selection for the hadronic boxes is a consequence
of the tighter threshold used for the hadronic razor trigger. The
kinematic plane defined by the baseline selection is divided into three
regions (see Fig.~\ref{fig:regions}):
\begin{itemize}
\item Low \ensuremath{M_\mathrm{R}}\xspace sideband: $400<\ensuremath{M_\mathrm{R}}\xspace<550$\GeV
and $\ensuremath{\mathrm{R}^2}\xspace>0.30$ for the hadronic boxes;
$300<\ensuremath{M_\mathrm{R}}\xspace<450$\GeV and $\ensuremath{\mathrm{R}^2}\xspace>0.20$ for the other
boxes.
\item Low \ensuremath{\mathrm{R}^2}\xspace sideband: $\ensuremath{M_\mathrm{R}}\xspace>450$\GeV and
$0.25<\ensuremath{\mathrm{R}^2}\xspace<0.30$ for the hadronic boxes;
$\ensuremath{M_\mathrm{R}}\xspace>350$\GeV and $0.15<\ensuremath{\mathrm{R}^2}\xspace<0.20$ for the other
boxes.
\item Signal-sensitive region: $\ensuremath{M_\mathrm{R}}\xspace>550$\GeV and
$\ensuremath{\mathrm{R}^2}\xspace>0.30$ for the hadronic boxes; $\ensuremath{M_\mathrm{R}}\xspace>450$\GeV
and $\ensuremath{\mathrm{R}^2}\xspace>0.20$ for the other boxes.
\end{itemize}
The bottom left corner of the razor plane, not included in any of the
three regions, is excluded from the analysis. Given this selection,
the multijet background from quantum chromodynamics processes is
reduced to a negligible level due to the fact that these processes
typically peak at $\ensuremath{\mathrm{R}^2}\xspace\approx0$ and fall exponentially for
larger values of $\ensuremath{\mathrm{R}^2}\xspace$~\cite{razorPRL,razorPRD}.
\begin{figure}[ht!]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth]{SidebandL_MultiJet.pdf}
\includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth]{SidebandL_Mu.pdf}
\caption{\label{fig:regions} Definition of the sideband and the
signal-sensitive regions used in the analysis, for (\cmsLeft) the hadronic
boxes and (\cmsRight) the other boxes.}
\end{figure}
\section{Modeling of the standard model backgrounds}
\label{sec:bmodel}
Under the hypothesis of no contribution from new-physics processes,
the event distribution in the considered portion of the
($\ensuremath{M_\mathrm{R}}\xspace$, $\ensuremath{\mathrm{R}^2}\xspace$) plane can be described by the sum of
the contributions from SM $\cPV$+jets events (where
$\cPV$ indicates a $\PW$ or $\cPZ$ boson) and SM top quark-antiquark and
single-top events, where the events with a top quark are generically
referred to as the $\ttbar$ contribution. Based on MC studies, the
contributions from other processes are determined to be
negligible.
We study each of these processes using MC samples, generated with the
\MADGRAPH v5
simulation~\cite{Alwall:2011uj,Alwall:2014hca}. Parton shower and
hadronization effects are included by matching events to the \PYTHIA v6.4.26 simulation~\cite{Sjostrand:2006za} using the MLM
algorithm~\cite{Hoche:2006ph}. The events are processed by a
\GEANT-based~\cite{G4} description of the CMS apparatus in order to
account for the response of the detector.
Once normalized to the NLO inclusive cross
section and the integrated luminosity, the absolute yield of the
$\cPV$+jets events contribution satisfying the event selection is found
to be negligible in all of the two-lepton boxes. In the remaining boxes,
its contribution to the total SM background is found to be
approximately 25\%. The contribution of $\cPV$+jets events in
the $\geq$2 \PQb-tag and the $\geq$4 jet sample is found to be
negligible. The remainder of the background in each box originates
from $\ttbar$ events.
Based on the study of the data collected at $\sqrt{s}=7\TeV$ and the
corresponding MC samples~\cite{razorPRL,razorPRD}, the two-dimensional
probability density function
$P_\mathrm{SM}(\ensuremath{M_\mathrm{R}}\xspace,\ensuremath{\mathrm{R}^2}\xspace)$ for each SM process is
found to be well described by the empirical function
\ifthenelse{\boolean{cms@external}}{
\begin{multline}
f(\ensuremath{M_\mathrm{R}}\xspace,\ensuremath{\mathrm{R}^2}\xspace) = \bigl[b(\ensuremath{M_\mathrm{R}}\xspace-{\ensuremath{M_\mathrm{R}^0}\xspace})^{1/n}(\ensuremath{\mathrm{R}^2}\xspace-{\ensuremath{\mathrm{R}^2_0}\xspace})
^{1/n}-1\bigr]\times\\
\re^{-bn(\ensuremath{M_\mathrm{R}}\xspace-{\ensuremath{M_\mathrm{R}^0}\xspace})^{1/n}(\ensuremath{\mathrm{R}^2}\xspace-{\ensuremath{\mathrm{R}^2_0}\xspace})
^{1/n}} ,
\label{eq:razFun}
\end{multline}
}{
\begin{equation}
f(\ensuremath{M_\mathrm{R}}\xspace,\ensuremath{\mathrm{R}^2}\xspace) = \bigl[b(\ensuremath{M_\mathrm{R}}\xspace-{\ensuremath{M_\mathrm{R}^0}\xspace})^{1/n}(\ensuremath{\mathrm{R}^2}\xspace-{\ensuremath{\mathrm{R}^2_0}\xspace})
^{1/n}-1\bigr]\re^{-bn(\ensuremath{M_\mathrm{R}}\xspace-{\ensuremath{M_\mathrm{R}^0}\xspace})^{1/n}(\ensuremath{\mathrm{R}^2}\xspace-{\ensuremath{\mathrm{R}^2_0}\xspace})
^{1/n}} ,
\label{eq:razFun}
\end{equation}
}
where $b$, $n$, $\ensuremath{M_\mathrm{R}^0}\xspace$, and $\ensuremath{\mathrm{R}^2_0}\xspace$ are free
parameters of the background model. For $n=1$, this function recovers
the two-dimensional exponential function used for previous
studies~\cite{razorPRL,razorPRD}. The shape of the empirical function
is determined through a \textsc{RooFit}-based extended and unbinned
maximum likelihood fit to the data~\cite{Verkerke:2003ir}. Two kinds
of fit are performed: (i)~a sideband-only fit, which is extrapolated
to the signal region in order to test for the presence of a signal
(discussed in the remainder of this section), and (ii)~a simultaneous
fit
to the signal and sideband regions, performed both under the
background-only and background-plus-signal hypotheses, which is used
for the interpretation of the results (Section~\ref{sec:limit}). In both cases, the empirical function is
found to adequately describe the SM background in each of the boxes,
for each \PQb-tagged jet multiplicity value.
The SM background-only likelihood function for the two-lepton boxes is written as:
\begin{equation}
\mathcal{L}(\text{data}|\Theta) = \frac{\re^{-N_\mathrm{SM}}}{N!} \prod_{i=1}^{N} N_\mathrm{SM}
P_\mathrm{SM}({\ensuremath{M_\mathrm{R}}\xspace}_{(i)},{\ensuremath{\mathrm{R}^2}\xspace}_{(i)}),
\label{eq:Lik1btag}
\end{equation}
where $P_\mathrm{SM}(\ensuremath{M_\mathrm{R}}\xspace,\ensuremath{\mathrm{R}^2}\xspace)$ is the empirical function in
Eq.~(\ref{eq:razFun}) normalized to unity, $N_{SM}$ is the
corresponding normalization factor, $\Theta$ is the set of
background shape and normalization parameters, and the product runs
over the $N$ events in the data set. The same form of the
likelihood is used for the other boxes, for each \PQb-tagged jet
multiplicity. The total likelihood in these boxes is computed as the
product of the likelihood functions for each \PQb-tagged jet
multiplicity.
The fits are performed independently for each box and simultaneously
across the \PQb-tagged jet multiplicity bins. Common background shape
parameters ($b$, ${\ensuremath{M_\mathrm{R}}\xspace}^0$, $\ensuremath{\mathrm{R}^2_0}\xspace$, and $n$) are used
for the 2 \PQb-tag and $\geq$3 \PQb-tag bins, since no substantial
difference between the two distributions is observed on large samples
of $\ttbar$ and $\cPV$+jets MC events. A difference is observed
between 1 \PQb-tag and $\geq$2 \PQb-tag samples, due to the observed
dependence of the \PQb-tagging efficiency on the jet $\pt$. Consequently,
the shape parameters for the 1 \PQb-tag bins are allowed to differ
from the corresponding parameters for the $\geq$2 \PQb-tag bins. The
background normalization parameters for each \PQb-tagged jet multiplicity
bin are also treated as independent parameters.
The background shape parameters are estimated from the events in the
two sidebands (Section~\ref{sec:razVar}). This shape is then used to
derive a background prediction in the signal-sensitive region:
$30\,000$ alternative sets of background shape parameters are generated
from the covariance matrix returned by the fit. An ensemble of
pseudo-experiment data sets is created, generating random
($\ensuremath{M_\mathrm{R}}\xspace$, $\ensuremath{\mathrm{R}^2}\xspace$) pairs distributed according to each
of these alternative shapes. For each bin of the signal-sensitive
region, the distribution of the predicted yields in each
pseudo-experiment is compared to the observed yield in data in order
to quantify the agreement between the background model and the
observation. The agreement, described as a two-sided p-value, is then
translated into the corresponding number of standard deviations for a
normal distribution. The p-value is computed using the probability
density as the ordering principle. The observed numbers of standard
deviations in the two-lepton boxes are shown in
Fig.~\ref{fig:FrenchFlagDilep}, as a function of \ensuremath{M_\mathrm{R}}\xspace and
$\ensuremath{\mathrm{R}^2}\xspace$. Positive and negative significance correspond to
regions where the observed yield is respectively larger and smaller
than the predicted one. Light gray areas correspond to empty bins with
less than one event expected on average. Similar results for the
one-lepton and hadronic boxes are shown in
Figs.~\ref{fig:FrenchFlagLep} and
\ref{fig:FrenchFlagHad}. Figures~\ref{fig:Proj1DDilep}--\ref{fig:Proj1DHad}
illustrate the extrapolation of the fit results to the full
($\ensuremath{M_\mathrm{R}}\xspace$, $\ensuremath{\mathrm{R}^2}\xspace$) plane, projected onto \ensuremath{\mathrm{R}^2}\xspace and \ensuremath{M_\mathrm{R}}\xspace and summed over the \PQb-tagged jet multiplicity
bins. No significant deviation of data from the SM background
predictions is observed.
\begin{figure}[tb!]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth]{nSigmaLog_MuEle.pdf}
\includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth]{nSigmaLog_MuMu.pdf}
\includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth]{nSigmaLog_EleEle.pdf}
\caption{Comparison of the expected background and the observed yield
in the (\cmsUpperLeft) MuEle, (\cmsUpperRight) MuMu, and (bottom)
EleEle boxes. A probability density function is derived for the
bin-by-bin yield using pseudo-experiments, sampled from the output
of the corresponding sideband fit. A two sided p-value is computed
comparing the observed yield to the distribution of background yield
from pseudo-experiments. The p-value is translated into the
corresponding number of standard deviations, quoted in each bin and
represented by the bin-filling color. Positive and negative
significance correspond to regions where the observed yield is
respectively larger and smaller than the predicted one. The white areas
correspond to bins in which a difference smaller than 0.1 standard
deviations is observed. The gray areas correspond to empty bins with
less than one background event expected on average. The dashed lines
represent the boundaries between the sideband and the signal
regions.\label{fig:FrenchFlagDilep}}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure*}[tb!]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth]{nSigmaLog_EleJet.pdf}
\includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth]{nSigmaLog_EleMultiJet.pdf}
\includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth]{nSigmaLog_MuJet.pdf}
\includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth]{nSigmaLog_MuMultiJet.pdf}
\caption{Comparison of the expected background and the observed yield
in (upper left) the EleJet, (upper right) the EleMultiJet, (lower left) the MuJet, and (lower right) the MuMultiJet
boxes. A detailed explanation is given in the caption of
Fig.~\ref{fig:FrenchFlagDilep}.\label{fig:FrenchFlagLep}}
\end{figure*}
\begin{figure}[tb!]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth]{nSigmaLog_Jet2b.pdf}
\includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth]{nSigmaLog_MultiJetFITS.pdf}
\caption{Comparison of the expected background and the observed yield
in the $\geq$2 \PQb-tagged jet box (\cmsLeft) and the MultiJet box
(\cmsRight). A detailed explanation is given in the caption of
Fig.~\ref{fig:FrenchFlagDilep}.\label{fig:FrenchFlagHad}}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure*}[tb!]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth]{MR_ElectronHad-Run2012ABCD_Sideband_MuEle.pdf}
\includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth]{RSQ_ElectronHad-Run2012ABCD_Sideband_MuEle.pdf}
\includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth]{MR_MuHad-Run2012ABCD_Sideband_MuMu.pdf}
\includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth]{RSQ_MuHad-Run2012ABCD_Sideband_MuMu.pdf}
\includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth]{MR_ElectronHad-Run2012ABCD_Sideband_EleEle.pdf}
\includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth]{RSQ_ElectronHad-Run2012ABCD_Sideband_EleEle.pdf}
\caption{Projection of the sideband fit result in the (upper row) MuEle, (middle row)
MuMu, and (lower row) EleEle boxes on \ensuremath{M_\mathrm{R}}\xspace (left) and
\ensuremath{\mathrm{R}^2}\xspace (right), respectively. The fit is performed
in the sideband regions and extrapolated to the signal-sensitive
region. The solid line and the filled band represent the total
background prediction and its uncertainty. The points and the band
in the bottom panel represent the data-to-prediction ratio and the
prediction uncertainty, respectively.\label{fig:Proj1DDilep}}
\end{figure*}
\begin{figure*}[tb!]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth]{MR_MuHad-Run2012ABCD_Sideband_MuJet.pdf}
\includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth]{RSQ_MuHad-Run2012ABCD_Sideband_MuJet.pdf}
\includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth]{MR_MuHad-Run2012ABCD_Sideband_MuMultiJet.pdf}
\includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth]{RSQ_MuHad-Run2012ABCD_Sideband_MuMultiJet.pdf}
\caption{Projection of the sideband fit result in the MuJet box on (upper left)
\ensuremath{M_\mathrm{R}}\xspace and (upper right) $\ensuremath{\mathrm{R}^2}\xspace$, and of the sideband fit
result in the MuMultiJet box on (lower left) \ensuremath{M_\mathrm{R}}\xspace and (lower right)
$\ensuremath{\mathrm{R}^2}\xspace$. The fit is performed in the sideband regions and
extrapolated to the signal-sensitive region. The solid line and the
filled band represent the total background prediction and its
uncertainty. The dashed and dot-dashed lines represent the
background shape for 1 \PQb-tag and $\geq$2 \PQb-tag events,
respectively. The points and the band in the bottom panel represent
the data-to-prediction ratio and the prediction uncertainty,
respectively.\label{fig:Proj1DMu}}
\end{figure*}
\begin{figure*}[tb!]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth]{MR_ElectronHad-Run2012ABCD_Sideband_EleJet.pdf}
\includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth]{RSQ_ElectronHad-Run2012ABCD_Sideband_EleJet.pdf}
\includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth]{MR_ElectronHad-Run2012ABCD_Sideband_EleMultiJet.pdf}
\includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth]{RSQ_ElectronHad-Run2012ABCD_Sideband_EleMultiJet.pdf}
\caption{Projection of the sideband fit result in the EleJet box on
(upper left) \ensuremath{M_\mathrm{R}}\xspace and (upper right) $\ensuremath{\mathrm{R}^2}\xspace$, and projection of the
sideband fit result in the EleMultiJet box on (lower left) \ensuremath{M_\mathrm{R}}\xspace and
(lower right) $\ensuremath{\mathrm{R}^2}\xspace$. A detailed explanation is given in the caption
of Fig.~\ref{fig:Proj1DMu}.\label{fig:Proj1DEle}}
\end{figure*}
\begin{figure*}[tb!]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth]{MR_HT-HTMHT-Run2012ABCD_Sideband_Jet2b.pdf}
\includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth]{RSQ_HT-HTMHT-Run2012ABCD_Sideband_Jet2b.pdf}
\includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth]{MR_HT-HTMHT-Run2012ABCD_Sideband_MultiJet.pdf}
\includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth]{RSQ_HT-HTMHT-Run2012ABCD_Sideband_MultiJet.pdf}
\caption{Projection of the sideband fit result in the $\geq$2 \PQb-tagged jet
box on (upper left) \ensuremath{M_\mathrm{R}}\xspace and (upper right) $\ensuremath{\mathrm{R}^2}\xspace$, and projection of
the sideband fit result in the MultiJet box on (lower left) \ensuremath{M_\mathrm{R}}\xspace and (lower right) $\ensuremath{\mathrm{R}^2}\xspace$. A detailed explanation is given in the
caption of Fig.~\ref{fig:Proj1DMu}.\label{fig:Proj1DHad}}
\end{figure*}
To demonstrate the discovery potential of this analysis, we apply the
background-prediction procedure to a simulated signal-plus-background
MC sample. Figure~\ref{fig:T1bbbbsignalinj} shows the \ensuremath{M_\mathrm{R}}\xspace and \ensuremath{\mathrm{R}^2}\xspace distributions of SM background events and T1bbbb
events (Section~\ref{sec:sms}). The gluino and LSP masses are set
respectively to 1325\GeV and 50\GeV, representing a new-physics
scenario near the expected sensitivity of the analysis. A
signal-plus-background sample is obtained by adding the two
distributions of Fig.~\ref{fig:T1bbbbsignalinj}, assuming an
integrated luminosity of 19.3\fbinv and a gluino-gluino production
cross section of 0.02\unit{pb}, corresponding to 78 expected signal events
in the signal-sensitive region. The agreement between the background
prediction from the sideband fit and the yield of the
signal-plus-background pseudo-experiments is displayed in
Fig.~\ref{fig:FFsigma0p02}. The contribution of signal events to the
sideband region has a negligible impact on the determination of the
background shape, while a disagreement is observed in the
signal-sensitive region, characterized as an excess of events
clustered around $\ensuremath{M_\mathrm{R}}\xspace\approx1300$\GeV. The excess indicates
the presence of a signal, and the position of the excess in the
$\ensuremath{M_\mathrm{R}}\xspace$ variable provides information about the underlying SUSY
mass spectrum.
\begin{figure}[htb!]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth]{SMbkgd_FF.pdf}
\includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth]{T1bbbb_1325_50_FF.pdf}
\caption{Distribution of (\cmsLeft) simulated SM background events and (\cmsRight)
T1bbbb gluino-gluino events in the MultiJet box. Each $\sGlu$ is
forced to decay to a \bbbar pair and a $\chiz_1$,
assumed to be the stable LSP. The $\sGlu$ and $\chiz_1$ masses are
fixed to 1325\GeV and 50\GeV,
respectively.\label{fig:T1bbbbsignalinj}}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure}[htb!]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth]{MR_T1bbbb_0p02_MultiJet.pdf}
\includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth]{RSQ_T1bbbb_0p02_MultiJet.pdf}
\includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth]{nSigmaLog_MultiJet.pdf}
\caption{Result of the fit to the sideband events of a
signal-plus-background MC sample, corresponding to the gluino model
whose distribution is shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:T1bbbbsignalinj}. A
gluino-gluino production cross section of 0.02\unit{pb} is assumed. The
one-dimensional projections on (\cmsUpperLeft) \ensuremath{M_\mathrm{R}}\xspace and (\cmsUpperRight)
\ensuremath{\mathrm{R}^2}\xspace are shown, together with (bottom) the agreement between
the observed yield and the prediction from the sideband fit as a
function of \ensuremath{\mathrm{R}^2}\xspace and $\ensuremath{M_\mathrm{R}}\xspace$. This agreement is
evaluated from a two-sided p-value using an ensemble of
background-only pseudo-experiments as described in
Section~\ref{sec:bmodel}.\label{fig:FFsigma0p02}}
\end{figure}
\section{Limit-setting procedure}
\label{sec:limit}
We interpret the results of the searches by determining the 95\%
confidence level (\CL) upper limits on the production cross sections of
the SUSY models presented in Section~\ref{sec:sms}, using the LHC
\ensuremath{\mathrm{CL}_\mathrm{s}}\xspace procedure~\cite{LHCCLs} and a global likelihood
determined by combining the likelihoods of the different search boxes
and sidebands. To reduce computational requirements, a binned
likelihood is used.
For the razor search boxes, the signal contribution is modeled by a
template function, for a given signal hypothesis in a specific box and
a given \PQb-tagged jet multiplicity. The template function, normalized
to unit probability, is multiplied by the expected signal yield in
each bin ($\sigma_\mathrm{NLO+NLL} L
\epsilon^{\text{box}}_{\PQb\text{-tag}}$). Here $\sigma_\mathrm{NLO+NLL}$ is
the SUSY signal cross section, $L$ is the integrated luminosity
corresponding to the size of the data set, and
$\epsilon^{\text{box}}_{\PQb\text{-tag}}$ is the signal selection
efficiency for a given box and, in case of the single-lepton and
hadronic boxes, for a given \PQb-tagged jet multiplicity.
Each systematic uncertainty is incorporated in the likelihood with a
dedicated nuisance parameter, whose value is not known a priori but
rather must be estimated from the data. The set of nuisance parameters
may be divided into three distinct classes (though their statistical
treatment is the same): those related to the signal normalization,
those related to the signal shape, and those related to the background
normalization and shape.
We consider the following systematic uncertainties associated with the
signal normalization, with the size of the uncertainty indicated in
parentheses:
\begin{itemize}
\item integrated luminosity (2.6\%)~\cite{CMS:2013gfa};
\item trigger efficiency (5\%);
\item lepton reconstruction and identification efficiencies (3\%
per lepton), measured from an inclusive $\cPZ\to \ell^+\ell^-$ event
sample ($\ell=\Pe,\Pgm$) as a function of the lepton $\pt$ and $\eta$
values~\cite{Chatrchyan:2013iaa,Chatrchyan:2013mxa}.
\end{itemize}
In addition, four signal-shape systematic uncertainties are considered, whose
sizes vary with $\ensuremath{\mathrm{R}^2}\xspace$, $\ensuremath{M_\mathrm{R}}\xspace$, and the \PQb-tagged jet
multiplicity:
\begin{itemize}
\item The uncertainty in the jet \PQb-tagging and mistagging efficiencies
(up to 20\% depending on the signal model), evaluated for each
($\ensuremath{M_\mathrm{R}}\xspace$, $\ensuremath{\mathrm{R}^2}\xspace$) and \PQb-tagged jet multiplicity
bin. The uncertainty is evaluated by propagating the uncertainty in
data-to-simulation scale factors~\cite{btag8TeV}.
\item the uncertainty in the modeling of the parton distribution
functions (PDFs) (up to 10\% depending on the signal model),
evaluated for each bin in the ($\ensuremath{M_\mathrm{R}}\xspace$, $\ensuremath{\mathrm{R}^2}\xspace$) plane
and for each box and \PQb-tag multiplicity following the
PDF4LHC~\cite{Bourilkov:2006cj,Alekhin:2011sk,Botje:2011sn}
prescription, using the CTEQ-6.6~\cite{Nadolsky:2008zw} and
MRST-2006-NNLO~\cite{Martin:2007bv} PDF sets.
\item The uncertainty in the jet energy scale and resolution (up to
5\% depending on the signal model), evaluated from a set of data
control samples and MC simulations~\cite{JME-JINST}.
\item The uncertainty in the modeling of the associated jet production
by the \MADGRAPH simulation (up to 20\% depending on the
signal model), studied using $\cPZ$+jets and $\ttbar$ data events
and parameterized by an MC-to-data scale factor as a function of the
magnitude of the vector sum of the $\pt$ values of the two produced
SUSY particles~\cite{1LepMVA}.
\end{itemize}
The impact of each of these uncertainties on the SUSY signal shape is
taken into account by varying each effect up or down by one standard
deviation.
The uncertainty in the knowledge of the background distributions
is taken into account by maximizing the likelihood with respect to the background shape and
normalization parameters using the data in the two
sidebands and the signal-sensitive region. The background parameterization
is able to accommodate several sources of
systematic uncertainties defined below:
\begin{itemize}
\item dependence of the background shape on the \PQb-tag multiplicity;
\item dependence of the background shape on the lepton and jet
multiplicities;
\item deviation of the two-dimensional shape from an exponentially falling
distribution, through the background empirical function parameter $n$,
which modifies the tail in \ensuremath{M_\mathrm{R}}\xspace and $\ensuremath{\mathrm{R}^2}\xspace$;
\item shape bias induced by the dependence of the \PQb-tagging efficiency and
mistag rate on the jet $\pt$;
\item deviation of the \PQb-tagging and mistagging efficiencies from the
MC prediction, through independent normalization factors in each
\PQb-tagged jet multiplicity bin.
\end{itemize}
The combination of razor and exclusive single-lepton~\cite{1LepMVA}
searches is performed using the same procedure, taking into account
the systematic uncertainties associated with the five following
effects:
\begin{itemize}
\item the PDFs;
\item the jet energy scale correction;
\item the integrated luminosity;
\item the b-jet tagging efficiency;
\item the associated jet production.
\end{itemize}
The uncertainties in the background predictions are taken to be
uncorrelated, being derived from independent data control samples with
different techniques. We verified that the correlation model for the
systematics has a negligible impact on the combination, since similar
results are obtained when neglecting any correlation between the
systematic uncertainties of the two searches.
\section{Interpretation}
\label{sec:interp}
The results of this search are interpreted in the context of the natural
SUSY simplified models presented in Section~\ref{sec:sms}.
\subsection{Limits on gluino pair production}
\label{sec:interp:gluino}
Derived limits on gluino pair production in the T1bbbb, T1tbbb,
T1ttbb, T1tttb, and T1tttt scenarios are presented in
Fig.~\ref{fig:gluino2D}. A comparison of the simplified natural SUSY
gluino-gluino exclusions, obtained for the different decay-mode
combinations of third generation quarks, is shown in
Fig.~\ref{fig:gluinogluinoSUMMARY}. The limits corresponding to
gluino-gluino topologies with mixed branching fractions lie within the
band defined by the T1bbbb and the T1tttt contours. As an example,
gluino masses smaller than 1175\GeV for T1tttt and 1310\GeV for T1bbbb
are excluded, for an LSP mass of 100\GeV. For any LSP mass value, a
larger number of top quarks in the decay topology corresponds to a
weaker limit, mainly due to a reduced total signal efficiency with
respect to the four-bottom-quark final state and a worse \ensuremath{M_\mathrm{R}}\xspace and
$\ensuremath{\mathrm{R}^2}\xspace$ resolution for events with higher jet multiplicity in the
final state. Given this fact and the inclusive nature of the analysis,
the T1tttt limit can be considered to represent a conservative
estimate of a branching-fraction-independent limit, generically valid
for gluino-gluino production within the context of the natural SUSY
spectrum shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:spectrum}.
\begin{figure*}[t]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.40\textwidth]{T1bbbbHybridNew0LXSEC.pdf}
\includegraphics[width=0.4\textwidth]{T1tbbbHybridNew0Lp1Lp2LXSEC.pdf}
\includegraphics[width=0.4\textwidth]{T1ttbbHybridNew0Lp1Lp2LXSEC.pdf}
\includegraphics[width=0.4\textwidth]{T1tttbHybridNew0Lp1Lp2LXSEC.pdf}
\includegraphics[width=0.4\textwidth]{T1ttttHybridNew0Lp1Lp2LXSEC.pdf}
\caption{Interpretation of the inclusive search with razor variables
in the context of gluino pair production models: (upper left) T1bbbb, (upper right)
T1tbbb, (middle left) T1ttbb, (middle right) T1tttb, and (bottom) T1tttt. The limit for T1bbbb
is derived using only the hadronic boxes, while the limits for the
remaining models are derived using all nine boxes. The color coding
indicates the observed 95\% \CL upper limit on the signal cross
section. The dashed and solid lines represent the expected and
observed exclusion contours at a 95\% \CL, respectively. The dashed
contours around the expected limit and the solid contours around the
observed one represent the one standard deviation theoretical
uncertainties in
the cross section and the combination of the statistical and
experimental systematic uncertainties,
respectively.\label{fig:gluino2D}}
\end{figure*}
\begin{figure}[tb!]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=\cmsFigWidth]{T1HybridNew0Lp1Lp2LBARE.pdf}
\caption{Gluino mass limit at a 95\% \CL, obtained for different gluino
pair production models with the inclusive razor analysis in the
context of the natural SUSY spectrum of
Fig.~\ref{fig:spectrum}.\label{fig:gluinogluinoSUMMARY}}
\end{figure}
\subsection{Limits on top-squark pair production}
\label{sec:interp:stop}
Derived limits on squark pair production from the razor variables in
the T2bW$^{\ast}$, T2tb, and T2tt scenarios are presented in
Fig.~\ref{fig:squark2D} and compared in
Fig.~\ref{fig:stopSUMMARY}. As in the
case of the gluino interpretation, the expected limit from the razor
search improves as the number of top quarks in the decay topology
decreases.
For an LSP mass of 100\GeV, top-squark mass values larger than
400\GeV and smaller than 650\GeV are excluded in all three
top-squark branching fraction scenarios.
Within the considered scenarios, a top-squark decay
to a chargino (neutralino) is topologically similar to a bottom-squark
decay to a neutralino (chargino). In the limit of degenerate charginos
and neutralinos, the decay products of the chargino are
generically too soft to be detected and this correspondence is
exact. However, for large mass differences between the squarks and the
chargino, the chargino decay products may be boosted enough to become
observable, breaking the correspondence. For the models
with the intermediate decay to charginos, there is a migration
of reconstructed events from the low-background 2b-Jet box to the
high-background MultiJet box and a consequently weaker
limit with respect to the simplified model without decays to charginos.
\begin{figure*}[tb!]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth]{T2bwHybridNew0LXSEC.pdf}
\includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth]{T2tbHybridNew0Lp1Lp2LXSEC.pdf}
\includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth]{T2ttHybridNew0Lp1Lp2LXSEC.pdf}
\caption{Interpretation of the inclusive search with razor variables
in the context of top-squark pair production models: (\cmsUpperLeft)
T2bW$^{\ast}$, (\cmsUpperRight) T2tb, and (bottom) T2tt. The limit for T2bW$^{\ast}$
is derived using only the hadronic boxes, while the limits for the
remaining models are derived using all nine boxes. The meaning of
the color coding and the displayed contours is explained in the
caption of Fig.~\ref{fig:gluino2D}.\label{fig:squark2D}}
\end{figure*}
\begin{figure}[tb!]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=\cmsFigWidth]{T2HybridNew0Lp1Lp2LBARE.pdf}
\caption{Top-squark mass limit at a 95\% \CL, obtained for different
squark pair production models with the inclusive razor analysis in the
context of the natural SUSY spectrum of
Fig.~\ref{fig:spectrum}.\label{fig:stopSUMMARY}}
\end{figure}
A stronger limit on top-squark pair production is derived by combining
the hadronic boxes of the razor search with the results of the
exclusive single-lepton analysis~\cite{1LepMVA}. The exclusive
single-lepton search is conservatively assumed to only have
sensitivity when both top squarks decay to a top quark and a
neutralino. Figure~\ref{fig:combinedLimit} (\cmsLeft) presents the combined result obtained for the scenario where the top
squark only decays to a top quark and the lightest neutralino. For an
LSP mass of 100\GeV, the combination improves the constraint on the
top-squark mass from 660 to 730\GeV. This result provides the
most stringent limit on this specific simplified model.
Figure~\ref{fig:combinedLimit} (\cmsRight) presents a more generic limit on the
top-squark mass. We consider two decay modes for the top squark, as
indicated in Fig.~\ref{fig:spectrum}. We scan the relative branching
fractions, assuming that no other decay mode is allowed. The largest
excluded cross section (that is, the worst upper limit) is found for
each choice of the top-squark and neutralino mass. A
branching-fraction-independent limit is derived by comparing the
worst-case exclusion to the corresponding top-squark pair production
cross section. In this manner, top squarks decaying to the two
considered decay modes are excluded at a 95\% confidence level for
mass values $>$400\GeV and $<$645\GeV, assuming a neutralino mass of
100\GeV. Unlike other simplified model interpretations, this
interpretation is not based on a specific choice of branching
fractions. While a residual model dependence is present because only
two decay modes are considered, this result is more general than
previous constraints.
\begin{figure}[tb!]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth]{T2ttCOMBINED.pdf}
\includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth]{T2briCOMBINED.pdf}
\caption{Top-squark mass limit at a 95\% \CL, obtained combining the
result of the hadronic razor boxes with the result of
Ref.~\cite{1LepMVA} for (\cmsLeft) T2tt and (\cmsRight) independent of
the branching fraction choice. The meaning of
the color coding and the displayed contours is explained in the
caption of Fig.~\ref{fig:gluino2D}.\label{fig:combinedLimit}}
\end{figure}
\section{Summary}
\label{sec:conclusion}
We present a search for supersymmetric particles using proton-proton
collision data collected by CMS in 2012 at $\sqrt{s} = 8\TeV$. The data set
size corresponds to an integrated luminosity of 19.3\fbinv. We
consider events with at least two jets, at least one of which is
identified as a \PQb-tagged jet, and study the event distribution in the
razor variables ($\ensuremath{M_\mathrm{R}}\xspace$, $\ensuremath{\mathrm{R}^2}\xspace$). The data are
classified according to the muon, electron, jet, and \PQb-tagged jet
multiplicities. No significant excess is observed with respect to the
standard model background expectations, derived from a fit to the data
distribution in low-$\ensuremath{M_\mathrm{R}}\xspace$ and low-$\ensuremath{\mathrm{R}^2}\xspace$ sidebands.
The inclusive razor search is translated into 95\% confidence level
exclusion limits on the masses of the gluino and the top squark, in the
context of simplified ``natural'' SUSY models. For a neutralino mass
of 100\GeV and depending on the branching fractions, the pair
production of gluinos and top squarks in multi-bottom, multi-top, and
mixed top-plus-bottom quark topologies is excluded for gluino masses
up to 1310\GeV and top-squark masses up to 660\GeV. Using the
combined likelihood of the hadronic boxes of the razor search and the
single-lepton channels of the exclusive top-squark
search~\cite{1LepMVA}, the exclusion bound on the top-squark mass is
extended to 730\GeV for a top squark decaying to a top quark and to a
neutralino of mass 100\GeV. Again assuming the neutralino mass to be 100\GeV, top
squarks decaying to the two considered decay modes are excluded at a
95\% confidence level for mass values between 400 and 645\GeV,
independent of the branching fractions.
\begin{acknowledgments}
\hyphenation{Bundes-ministerium Forschungs-gemeinschaft Forschungs-zentren} We congratulate our colleagues in the CERN accelerator departments for the excellent performance of the LHC and thank the technical and administrative staffs at CERN and at other CMS institutes for their contributions to the success of the CMS effort. In addition, we gratefully acknowledge the computing centers and personnel of the Worldwide LHC Computing Grid for delivering so effectively the computing infrastructure essential to our analyses. Finally, we acknowledge the enduring support for the construction and operation of the LHC and the CMS detector provided by the following funding agencies: the Austrian Federal Ministry of Science, Research and Economy and the Austrian Science Fund; the Belgian Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique, and Fonds voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek; the Brazilian Funding Agencies (CNPq, CAPES, FAPERJ, and FAPESP); the Bulgarian Ministry of Education and Science; CERN; the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ministry of Science and Technology, and National Natural Science Foundation of China; the Colombian Funding Agency (COLCIENCIAS); the Croatian Ministry of Science, Education and Sport, and the Croatian Science Foundation; the Research Promotion Foundation, Cyprus; the Ministry of Education and Research, Estonian Research Council via IUT23-4 and IUT23-6 and European Regional Development Fund, Estonia; the Academy of Finland, Finnish Ministry of Education and Culture, and Helsinki Institute of Physics; the Institut National de Physique Nucl\'eaire et de Physique des Particules~/~CNRS, and Commissariat \`a l'\'Energie Atomique et aux \'Energies Alternatives~/~CEA, France; the Bundesministerium f\"ur Bildung und Forschung, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, and Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Deutscher Forschungszentren, Germany; the General Secretariat for Research and Technology, Greece; the National Scientific Research Foundation, and National Innovation Office, Hungary; the Department of Atomic Energy and the Department of Science and Technology, India; the Institute for Studies in Theoretical Physics and Mathematics, Iran; the Science Foundation, Ireland; the Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Italy; the Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning, and National Research Foundation (NRF), Republic of Korea; the Lithuanian Academy of Sciences; the Ministry of Education, and University of Malaya (Malaysia); the Mexican Funding Agencies (CINVESTAV, CONACYT, SEP, and UASLP-FAI); the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment, New Zealand; the Pakistan Atomic Energy Commission; the Ministry of Science and Higher Education and the National Science Centre, Poland; the Funda\c{c}\~ao para a Ci\^encia e a Tecnologia, Portugal; JINR, Dubna; the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation, the Federal Agency of Atomic Energy of the Russian Federation, Russian Academy of Sciences, and the Russian Foundation for Basic Research; the Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of Serbia; the Secretar\'{\i}a de Estado de Investigaci\'on, Desarrollo e Innovaci\'on and Programa Consolider-Ingenio 2010, Spain; the Swiss Funding Agencies (ETH Board, ETH Zurich, PSI, SNF, UniZH, Canton Zurich, and SER); the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taipei; the Thailand Center of Excellence in Physics, the Institute for the Promotion of Teaching Science and Technology of Thailand, Special Task Force for Activating Research and the National Science and Technology Development Agency of Thailand; the Scientific and Technical Research Council of Turkey, and Turkish Atomic Energy Authority; the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, and State Fund for Fundamental Researches, Ukraine; the Science and Technology Facilities Council, UK; the US Department of Energy, and the US National Science Foundation.
Individuals have received support from the Marie-Curie program and the European Research Council and EPLANET (European Union); the Leventis Foundation; the A. P. Sloan Foundation; the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation; the Belgian Federal Science Policy Office; the Fonds pour la Formation \`a la Recherche dans l'Industrie et dans l'Agriculture (FRIA-Belgium); the Agentschap voor Innovatie door Wetenschap en Technologie (IWT-Belgium); the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports (MEYS) of the Czech Republic; the Council of Science and Industrial Research, India; the HOMING PLUS program of Foundation for Polish Science, cofinanced from European Union, Regional Development Fund; the Compagnia di San Paolo (Torino); the Consorzio per la Fisica (Trieste); MIUR project 20108T4XTM (Italy); the Thalis and Aristeia programs cofinanced by EU-ESF and the Greek NSRF; and the National Priorities Research Program by Qatar National Research Fund.
\end{acknowledgments}
\clearpage
|
\section{Introduction}
In quasi two-dimensional (2D), extreme type-II superconductors, such as the
organic charge transfer salts (ET)$_{2}$X,\cite{Yamaji90,Toyota07} and the
high-transition temperature ($T_{c}$) compound Bi$_{2}$Sr$_{2}$CaCu$_{2}$O$%
_{8}$ (BSCCO),\cite{Subramanian88} the existence and extent of highly
ordered three-dimensional (3D) vortex lattice states are known to be
strongly dependent on the coupling between the underlying 2D superconducting
(SC) layers. In such compounds with weakly coupled SC layers (via very small
Josephson tunneling currents) subjected to a magnetic field applied
perpendicular to the layers,\cite{Wosnitza96} the vortex system consists of
stacked layers of pancake-like vortices.\cite{BlatterRMP94} For applied
magnetic fields not far below the upper critical field ($H_{c2}$), the
relatively strongly coupled intralayer pancake vortices can form well
ordered 2D lattices, whereas the pancake vortices in adjacent layers couple
very weakly by the electromagnetic dipole interaction. Consequently, while
at low temperatures straight magnetic flux lines threading weakly coupled
pancake vortices may essentially form a 3D ordered lattice, these flux lines
can be easily distorted by thermal fluctuations at elevated temperatures.
This leads to a loss of 3D order, which occurs at a dimensional crossover
field ($H_{\mathrm{2D}}$) far below $H_{c2}$. Further disordering of the
flux lattice, by strong thermal fluctuations within the individual layers of
vortices, can occur at much higher magnetic field, causing a complete loss
of order (vortex-lattice melting) at an intermediate field $H_{\mathrm{2D}%
}\! \ll \!H\!<\!H_{c2}$ \cite{HuMacDonald93-94,ZM99,Maniv01}. These
order-disorder transitions have been extensively studied in BSCCO, via for
example, small-angle neutron scattering (SANS),\cite{CubittNature93} muon
spin rotation ($\mu $SR),\cite{LeePRL93,LeePRB97} irreversibility-line \cite%
{SchillingPRL93} and magnetization \cite{TamegaiPhysicaC93} measurements.
Similar vortex-lattice transitions have also been investigated in the low-$%
T_{c}$, quasi-2D organic superconductors (see Ref.~\onlinecite{Toyota07} for
a review), with applications of the $\mu $SR technique focusing on the
charge transfer salts $\kappa $-(ET)$_{2}$Cu(NCS)$_{2}$,\cite%
{Lee-ET-PRL97,Blundell2004} and $\kappa $-(ET)$_{2}$Cu[N(CN)$_{2}$]Br\cite%
{Lancaster2011}.
Theoretical estimates of the 3D-2D crossover field $H_{\mathrm{2D}}$, based
on a continuum elastic description of the vortex lattice,\cite%
{GlazmanPRB91,BlatterPRB96} yield characteristic values in the range of $H_{%
\mathrm{2D}}\sim \Phi _{0}/\lambda ^{2}$ (where $\Phi _{0}$ is the magnetic
flux quantum, and $\lambda $ is the in-plane magnetic penetration depth),
which is about 3 orders of magnitude smaller than $H_{c2}$. These estimates
have been confirmed in a number of $\mu $SR experiments performed on the
relevant compounds.\cite{LeePRL93,LeePRB97,Blundell2004} However, in some
cases the loss of order deduced from changes in the $\mu $SR lineshape with
increasing magnetic field was incomplete,\cite{AgerterPRB96} indicating the
existence of partially-ordered 3D flux-line networks at magnetic fields well
above the theoretically predicted values of $H_{\mathrm{2D}}$. The existence
of such partially-ordered 3D vortex phases at magnetic fields $H\! \gg \!H_{%
\mathrm{2D}}$ has been demonstrated by transport\cite{Zeldov98} and SANS
measurements\cite{Forgan96} of BSCCO single crystals.
In the present paper we provide clear $\mu $SR evidence for the existence of
a partially-ordered vortex lattice phase in the quasi-2D organic
superconductors $\kappa $-(ET)$_{2}$Cu[N(CN)$_{2}$]Br ($\kappa $-Br) and $%
\kappa $-(ET)$_{2}$Cu(NCS)$_{2}$ ($\kappa $-CuNCS) at magnetic fields much
higher than the values of $H_{\mathrm{2D}}$ predicted by the continuum
elastic model. We also show that the observed sharp changes of the $\mu $SR
lineshape, generally associated with the loss of flux-line order, is
consistent with melting of pancake vortex lattices within the layers, rather
than a 3D-2D crossover. We suggest that in the low-temperature,
high-magnetic field region of the phase diagram investigated, small
concentrations of defects that pin flux lines perpendicular to the SC
layers, effectively resist the breakup of the entire 3D vortex lattice by
thermal fluctuations.
\section{Experimental}
Transverse-field (TF) $\mu $SR measurements with applied magnetic fields in
the range $1.0\!<\!H\!<\!4.5$~T were carried out on the M15 muon beam line
at TRIUMF, using a spectrometer consisting of a top loading Oxford
Instruments dilution-refrigerator (DR). The magnetic field was applied
perpendicular to the highly-conducting layers, i.e., parallel to the $b$%
-axis, or $a^{\ast }$-axis of each sample, which were mosaics consisting of
tens of single crystals of $\kappa $-Br or $\kappa $-CuNCS. The use of a
mosaic was necessary, due to the small size of the individual single
crystals --- typically less than $1$~mm wide and $100$~$\mu $m thick. The
crystals were mounted on a pure Ag sample holder using Apiezon grease. \ The
single crystals were grown by standard electrochemical crystallization
according to the literature methods.\cite{Urayama88,Wang90} The
superconducting transition temperature $T_{c}$ determined by thermodynamic
methods is $9.3\pm 0.1$ K and $11.5\pm 0.1$ K for $\kappa $-CuNCS and $%
\kappa $-Br, respectively.
A fast Fourier transform (FFT) of the TF-$\mu $SR signal closely resembles
the internal magnetic-field distribution $P(B)$.\cite{S13} The measurements
reported here were typically done by first cooling the sample from room
temperature to $T\!=\!20$~mK in a magnetic field of $H\!=\!1$~T, and
subsequently measuring the field dependence of the TF-$\mu $SR signal. For
each value of the applied field, measurements were also performed at $%
T\!=\!10$~K, which is well above the irreversibility lines for both
compounds,\cite{Sasaki98,Hagel97} and hence at a temperature where the
vortex structure has no influence on the $\mu $SR lineshape. The
measurements at $T\!=\!10$~K (henceforth referred to as the reference
signal), provide a visualization of the broadening of the TF-$\mu $SR
lineshape by the sample nuclear dipole moments, the field inhomogeneity of
the external magnet, and the background from muons stopping in the sample
holder and other places outside the sample.
\section{Results}
\begin{figure}[tbp]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=8.5cm]{fig1NNN.jpg}
\end{center}
\caption{(color online) Probability {magnetic field distribution}, $P(B)$,
for $\protect \kappa $-(ET)$_{2}$Cu(NCS)$_{2}$ (magenta solid {curves and}
left-hand scale) at {$T\!=\!20$~mK and} different external magnetic fields, {%
obtained} by deconvoluting the FFTs (blue dashed {curves and} right-hand
scale) of the {TF-}$\protect \mu $SR signals. {An order-disorder} transition {%
is observable between $H\!=\!2$~T and $H\!=\!3$~T.} {These measurements}
were performed after field-cooling to {$T\!=\!20$~mK at $H\!=\!1$~T.} The {%
curves are offset} vertically for {visual clarity}. The reference signal{s}
used in the deconvolution {process} (not shown) were measured on the same
sample at $T\!=\!10$~K, {well} above the irreversibility line.}
\label{Fig.1}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure}[tbp]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=8.5cm]{fig2NNN.jpg}
\end{center}
\caption{(color online) Probability {magnetic field distribution}, $P(B)$,
for $\protect \kappa $-(ET)$_{2}$Cu[N(CN)$_{2}$]Br (magenta solid {curves and}
left-hand scale) at {$T\!=\!20$~mK and} different external magnetic fields, {%
obtained} by deconvoluting the FFTs (blue dashed {curves and} right-hand
scale) of the $\protect \mu $SR signals{. A} disordering transition {is
observed between $H\!=\!3$~T and $H\!=\!4.5$~T.} {These measurements} were
performed after field-cooling to {$T\!=\!20$~mK at $H\!=\!1$~T. As in Fig.~%
\protect \ref{Fig.1}, the reference signals recorded at $T\!=\!10$~K are not
shown.}}
\label{Fig.2}
\end{figure}
Figure~\ref{Fig.1} shows typical FFTs of the TF-$\mu $SR signals for $\kappa
$-CuNCS at $T\!=\!20$~mK, and the corresponding probability field
distribution, $P(B)$, obtained by deconvoluting each FFT in the frequency
domain with respect to the reference signal. Figure~\ref{Fig.2} shows
results of similar measurements for the sister compound $\kappa $-Br. \ The
most striking feature of the deconvoluted TF-$\mu $SR lineshapes shown in
Figs.~\ref{Fig.1} and \ref{Fig.2}, is their clear asymmetry, which is
characterized by a positive skewness parameter $\alpha =\left \langle \Delta
B^{3}\right \rangle ^{1/3}/\left \langle \Delta B^{2}\right \rangle ^{1/2}$,
where $\Delta B\!=\!B-\left \langle B\right \rangle $ and $\langle B\rangle $
is the average internal field\cite{S13,Maniv2011}. This is clearly observed
in a broad field range, up to a $H\!=\!2.5$~T for $\kappa $-CuNCS, and up to
$H\!=\!4$~T for $\kappa $-Br --- above which $\alpha $ changes sign rather
abruptly. As shown in Fig.~\ref{Fig.3}, at $T\!=\!20$~mK positive values of
the skewness parameter in the range $0.5\!<\! \alpha \!<\!1.0$ reflect the
striking existence of partially-ordered 3D vortex-lattice states at magnetic
fields $H\! \gg \!H_{\mathrm{2D}}$ in both materials, which are comprised of
very weakly coupled 2D conducting layers.\cite{Singleton02} At higher
temperatures, the field range of the ordered phase shrinks considerably, as
shown in Fig.~\ref{Fig.3} for $\kappa $-Br at $T\!=\!1$~K, where the onset
of a negative $\alpha $ is observed above $H\!=\!2$~T. Note that previous TF-%
$\mu $SR lineshape measurements on $\kappa $-CuNCS performed at $T\!=\!1.8$%
~K,\cite{Lee-ET-PRL97,Blundell2004} showed positive values of the skewness
parameter $\beta =\left \langle \Delta B\right \rangle /\left \langle \Delta
B^{2}\right \rangle ^{1/2}$, which drops to zero in fields of 10 to 20~mT,
consistent with the continuum elastic theory.\cite{GlazmanPRB91,BlatterPRB96}
\ As we discuss in the next section, the rapid pre-cooling of the samples
that occurred when they were loaded into the dilution refrigerator may have
resulted in intrinsic structural disorder. Pinning associated with this
disorder may be responsible for the observed robustness of the vortex
lattice to thermal fluctuations up to high magnetic fields.
\section{Discussion}
\begin{figure}[t]
\includegraphics[width=10cm]{SkewN.pdf}
\caption{(color online) Field dependence of the {skewness} parameter ($%
\protect \alpha $) for $\protect \kappa $-(ET)$_{2}$Cu(NCS)$_{2}$ at {$%
T\!=\!20 $~mK} (black {solid} squares), and for $\protect \kappa $-(ET)$_{2}$%
Cu[N(CN)$_{2}$]Br at {$T\!=\!20$~mK} (red {solid} circles) and {$T\!=\!1$~K}
(blue {open} squares). The lines connecting the {data} points are guides to
the eye. }
\label{Fig.3}
\end{figure}
For the first time, the high-field, low-temperature region of the vortex
state of the quasi-2D organic superconductors, $\kappa $-CuNCS and $\kappa $%
-Br, have been investigated by $\mu $SR. At the lowest temperature
considered ($T\!=\!20$~mK), an order-disorder crossover field, as determined
from the sign change of the skewness parameter $\alpha $, is found for both
materials --- occurring near $H\!=\!2.5$~T and $4$~T for $\kappa $-CuNCS and
$\kappa $-Br, respectively. These values are of the order of the respective
irreversibility fields extracted from low-temperature magnetization
measurements,\cite{Sasaki98,Hagel97} and much larger than the 3D-2D
crossover fields for electromagnetically coupled layers of pancake vortices
that have been reported for these materials (e.g. $H_{\mathrm{2D}}\! \sim
\!10^{-2}$~T for $\kappa $-CuNCS\cite{Lee-ET-PRL97}). Furthermore, the
observation of positive values of $\alpha $ in $\kappa $-Br for magnetic
fields up to $H\!=\!2$~T at the higher temperature of $T\!=\!1$~K, reflects
a robustness of the 3D vortex lattice to thermal fluctuations of pancake
vortices in the individual SC layers. Analytical calculations based on a 2D
Ginzburg-Landau theory,\cite{ZM99,Maniv01} which agree well with numerical
Monte Carlo simulations,\cite{HuMacDonald93-94} show, for material
parameters characteristic of $\kappa $-CuNCS [see Fig.~3(b) in Ref.~%
\onlinecite{Maniv2004}], that melting of an ordered vortex lattice at $%
T\!=\!0.1T_{c}\! \approx \!1$~K, in each individual 2D SC layer, occurs
around $H\!=\!0.4H_{c2}\! \approx \!2$~T. Moreover, the irreversibility
field,\cite{Sasaki98} which may be associated with a critical field for
depinning of vortices, follows closely the 2D vortex-lattice melting field
[also shown in Fig.~3(b) of Ref.~\onlinecite{Maniv2004}]. Numerical
simulations of the skewness parameter $\alpha $, performed for weakly
coupled layers of pancake vortices,\cite{SchneiderPRB95} show that a 3D-2D
crossover reduces $\alpha $\ to about 30\% of its (positive) low-field
value, whereas melting of the constituent 2D vortex lattices causes the sign
of $\alpha $ to abruptly change from positive to negative. Since the values
of $\alpha $ shown in Fig.~3 below the order-disorder transition fields are
larger than that predicted for a disordered multilayer of 2D vortex lattices
(i.e. $\alpha \! \simeq \!0.3$),\cite{SchneiderPRB95} it is conceivable that
no 3D-2D crossover takes place in the low-field region. Instead, it appears
that the only order-disorder transition that occurs in the entire field
range investigated, is melting of a partially-ordered 3D vortex lattice.
This conclusion is consistent with the single first-order vortex lattice
melting transition predicted in a Monte-Carlo study of the Lawrence-Doniach
model for a layered superconductor.\cite{HuMaC97}
The apparent absence of a low-field 3D-2D crossover in our measurements
suggests that the observed 3D partially-ordered vortex lattice is probably
stabilized by strong pinning due to a small concentration of defects. This
scenario is supported by the proximity of the irreversibility (depinning)
transition to the melting transition, previously observed for $\kappa $%
-CuNCS.\cite{Maniv2004} However, it should be noted that the sharp sign
change of $\alpha $ observed for both materials, could be associated with a
transition to a vortex-glass phase,\cite{Menon06,Maniv2011} rather than a
vortex-lattice melting transition. \
The primary source of flux-line pinning may be a consequence of the high
rate at which the samples{\ }were pre-cooled when loaded into the dilution
refrigerator. During the pre-cooling stage, the sample is cooled from room
temperature to $4.2$~K in about 15 to 20 minutes, passing through the
glass-like structural transition at $T_{g}\sim 75$ K, which -- for the $%
\kappa $-phase ET salts with polymeric anions Cu(NCS)$_{2}$ and Cu[N(CN)$%
_{2} $]Br -- is related to a certain degree of disorder in the orientational
degrees of freedom of the ET molecules' ethylene endgroups (EEG) (see Ref.~%
\onlinecite{Toyota07} for an overview). The EEG orientations are thermally
disordered at room temperature, and for kinetic reasons, become frozen in a
non-equilibrium configuration depending on the cooling rate at $T_{g}$.\cite%
{Muller02} The pre-cooling rate in our experiments was about $20$ K/min,
which corresponds to a random lattice potential associated with structural
disorder in $3$ to $4$ $\%$ of the sample. \cite{Hertmann14} Clustering of
metastable EEG configurations in this volume fraction of the sample and into
domain sizes exceeding the in-plane coherence length,\cite{Yoneyama04} is a
likely source of the strong flux-line pinning that accommodates the
partially-ordered vortex lattice. \bigskip
This research was supported by TECHNION/V.P.R FUND, and by EuroMagNET under
the EU contract No.\ 228043, and by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
(DFG) within the collaborative research center SFB/TR49. J. E. Sonier
acknowledges support from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research
Council of Canada. T.M. is grateful to T. Sasaki for stimulating discussions
regarding relevant experimental aspects of the paper, and to Dingping Li and
B. Rosenstein for invaluable discussions of theoretical aspects.
|
\section{Introduction}
The increasing number of new wireless access devices and various services lead to a significant increase in the demand for higher user data rate. While the higher energy consumption is a great concern as well for future wireless communication systems. Recently, there has been an upsurge of interest in the energy efficiency (EE) optimization field.
Basic concepts of energy-efficient communications are introduced in \cite{wu2012green} and several advanced physical layer techniques for EE are studied in \cite{xiao2013qos,miao2013energy1,ng2012energy2,cheung2012achieving,zhang2011energy}.
However, all the above works only consider one side power consumption, i.e., either the transmitter (Tx) or the receiver (Rx) side.
In fact, the expectation of limiting electric expenditure and reducing carbon emissions requires the base station to perform in an energy-efficient manner \cite{wu2012green}, while minimizing the user side energy consumption also deserves more efforts due to capacity limited batteries and user experience requirements \cite{kim2010leveraging,luo2013joint}. Moreover,
according to \cite{auer2010d2}, the techniques adopted to improve the EE of one end of the communication system may adversely affect the EE of the other end. Therefore, it is necessary to consider the joint Tx and Rx EE optimization, which shall provide more flexibility for the energy saving at the side interested or both.
For EE oriented research, one of the most important tasks is to quantify the power consumption of the communication system \cite{auer2010d2}.
Most of the existing works only consider a constant circuit power so as to simplify the system analysis and make the problem more tractable.
However, it has been reported in \cite{wu2012green,gruber2009earth} that a rough modeling for the power consumption can not reflect the true behaviour of
wireless devices and thus might provide misleading conclusions. Therefore, the power consumption modeling should not only capture the key
system components but also characterize the reality \cite{wu2012green}.
The main contributions of this paper are summarized as follows:
1) We formulate the joint Tx and Rx EE maximization problem in which the link dependent signal processing power, the static circuit power as well as the
transmission power are considered based on a comprehensive study \cite{auer2010d2}, while the power model of existing works
\cite{xiao2013qos,miao2013energy1,cheung2012achieving,ng2012energy2
,xu2013energy,mao2013energy} are basically special cases.
2) We explore the fractional structure of the system EE and introduce the concept of the individual EE, i.e., the link EE and the user EE. Based on these, an optimal approach of linear complexity is proposed to solve the non-convex EE maximization problem. Moreover, this approach can also be used to optimally solve the problem in \cite{miao2013energy1} where only a quadratic complexity method is proposed.
3) We reveal that the static receiving power has an implicit interpretation of the optimal number of scheduled users. In the extreme case when the static receiving power is negligible, time division multiplexing access (TDMA) is optimal for the energy-efficient transmission.
\section{System Description and Problem Formulation}
\subsection{System Model}
Consider a multi-user multi-radio network, where $K$ users are communicating with one access point (AP) over $M$ orthogonal radio links simultaneously.
It is assumed that each user $k$, for $k=1,...,K$, is assigned prior with a fixed subset of radio links, denoted as $\mathcal{M}_k$, and that the radio links of different users do not overlap with each other so as to void interference, i.e., $\mathcal{M}_k\bigcap \mathcal{M}_m ={\O}$. The multiple radio links can be formed by orthogonal multiplexing techniques, such as frequency division multiplexing.
The channel between the AP and each user is assumed to be quasi-static fading and they are all equipped with one antenna.
It is assumed that the perfect and global channel state information (CSI) of all users is available for the AP, which allows us to do energy-efficient scheduling.
The channel gain of user $k$ over link $i$ and the corresponding power allocation of this link are denoted as $g_{k,i}$ and $p_{k,i}$, respectively. The receiver noise is modelled as a circularly symmetric complex Gaussian random variable with zero mean and variance $\sigma^2$ for all links. Then the data rate of user $k$ over link $i$, denoted as $r_{k,i}$, can be expressed as
\begin{equation}\label{eq1}
r_{k,i}=B\log_{2}\left(1+\frac{p_{k,i}g_{k,i}}{\Gamma\sigma^2}\right),
\end{equation}
where $B$ is the bandwidth of each radio link and $\Gamma$ characterizes the gap between actual achievable rate and channel capacity due to a practical modulation and coding design \cite{miao2013energy1}. Consequently, the overall system data rate can be expressed as
\begin{equation}\label{eq2}
R_{\rm{tot}}=\sum^{K}_{k=1}\omega_k R_k=\sum^{K}_{k=1}\omega_k\sum_{i\in \mathcal{M}_k} r_{k,i},
\end{equation}
where $R_k$ is the data rate of user $k$ and $\omega_k$ which is provided by upper layers, represents the priority of user $k$.
\subsection{Joint Tx/Rx Power Consumption Model }
In this work, we adopt the power consumption model from \cite{auer2010d2} published by Energy Aware Radio and neTwork tecHnologies (EARTH) project, which provides a comprehensive characterization of the power consumption for each component involved in the communication.
At the user side, the power dissipation consists of two parts, i.e., the transmission power and the circuit power. Denote $P_{Tk}$ as the overall transmission power of user $k$ and it is given by
\begin{equation}\label{eq3}
P_{Tk}=\frac{\sum_{i\in \mathcal{M}_k} p_{k,i}}{\xi},
\end{equation}
where $\xi\in(0,1]$ is a constant which accounts for the efficiency of the power amplifier.
Denote $P_{Ck}$ as the circuit power of user $k$. According to \cite{auer2010d2}, the circuit power of each device contains a dynamic part for the signal processing which linearly scales with the number of active links, and a static part independent of links for other circuit blocks, i.e.,
\begin{equation}\label{eq4}
P_{Ck}(n_k^o)=n_k^oP_{{\rm{dyn}}, k}+\mathcal{I}(n_k^o)P_{{\rm{sta}}, k},
\end{equation}
where $n_k^o$ is the number of active links and can be expressed as
$n_k^o=\sum_{i\in \mathcal{M}_k} \mathcal{I}(p_{k,i})$. Here,
the indicator function $\mathcal{I} (x)$ is defined as
\begin{equation}\label{eq5}
\mathcal{I}(x) =\left\{
\begin{array}{lcl}
1,& \text{if}~ x>0,\\
0,& \text{otherwise}.
\end{array}\right.
\end{equation}
Specifically, if $p_{k,i}>0$, then $ \mathcal{I}(p_{k,i})=1$ means that link $i$ is active, and if $n_k^o>0$, then $ \mathcal{I}(n_k^o)=1$ means that user $k$ is scheduled.
In (\ref{eq4}), $P_{{\rm{dyn}}, k}$ and $P_{{\rm{sta}}, k}$ are dynamic and static components of the circuit power for user $k$, respectively.
Considering different types of terminals in practical systems, $P_{{\rm{dyn}}, k}$ and $P_{{\rm{sta}},k}$ can be different for different user $k$. Now, the overall power consumption of user $k$, denoted as $P_k$, is
\begin{equation}\label{eq6}
P_k=P_{Tk}+P_{Ck}(n_k^o).
\end{equation}
At the AP side, the receiving circuit power consumption also consists of two similar parts as the user device \cite{kim2010leveraging,auer2010d2}. Denote $P_{\rm{dyn, 0}}$ and $P_{\rm{sta,0}}$ as the dynamic and static receiving circuit power, respectively. Then the overall power consumption at the AP side can be expressed as
\begin{equation}\label{eq7}
P_{0}=\sum_{k=1}^{K}n^o_kP_{{\rm{dyn}},0}+P_{{\rm{sta}},0}.
\end{equation}
Finally, the overall power consumption of the system can be expressed as
\begin{align}\label{eq8}
P_{\rm{tot}} =\sum^{K}_{k=1} P_k+P_0.
\end{align}
\subsection{Problem Formulation}
Energy efficiency is commonly defined by the ratio of the overall system rate $R_{\rm{tot}}$ over the overall system power consumption $P_{\rm{tot}}$ \cite{xiao2013qos,miao2013energy1,cheung2012achieving}.
Our goal is to jointly optimize the user scheduling, the link activation and the power control to maximize the EE of the considered system.
Mathematically, we can formulate the EE optimization problem as (P1)
\begin{align}\label{eq10}
\mathop {\max }\limits_{\bm{p}} &~~\frac{\sum_{k=1}^{K} \omega_k\sum_{i\in \mathcal{M}_k} B\log_{2}\left(1+\frac{p_{k,i}g_{k,i}}{\Gamma\sigma^2}\right)}
{\sum^{K}_{k=1} \left( \frac{\sum_{i\in \mathcal{M}_k} p_{k,i}}{\xi}+ P_{Ck}(n_k^o) + n_k^oP_{{\rm{dyn}},0}\right)+ P_{{\rm{sta}},0}} \nonumber \\
\text{s.t.} \,&~~ n_k^o=\sum_{i\in \mathcal{M}_k} \mathcal{I}(p_{k,i}), ~~~ 1\leq k \leq K, i\in \mathcal{M}_k, \nonumber \\
& ~~0\leq p_{k,i}\leq P^{k,i}_{\mathop{\max}}, ~~~ 1\leq k \leq K, i\in \mathcal{M}_k,
\end{align}
where $\bm{p} \triangleq$ \{$p_{k,i}|k=1,2,...K;i\in \mathcal{M}_k$\}. For practical consideration, we assume that each radio link $i$ of user $k$ has a maximum allowed transmit power $P^{k,i}_{\mathop{\max}}$. Note that the authors in \cite{miao2013energy1} consider a similar problem formulation to (\ref{eq10}) but without power constraint which is thereby a special case of this paper.
The existence of the two layered indicator functions, i.e., $\mathcal{I}(p_{k,i})$ and $\mathcal{I}(n_k^o)=\mathcal{I}\left(\sum_{i\in \mathcal{M}_k} \mathcal{I}(p_{k,i})\right)$ makes the objective function discontinuous and hence non-differentiable. The global optimal solution of (\ref{eq10}) is generally difficult to be obtained with an efficient complexity. In the following section, we explore the particular structure of system EE and show that the global optimal solution can actually be obtained using a divide-and-conquer approach with low complexity.
\section{Energy-Efficient Scheduling}
In this section, we solve the system EE maximization problem directly from a fractional-form perspective. This idea results from the connection of the EE from three levels, namely, \emph{the link Energy Efficiency}, \emph{the user Energy Efficiency}, and \emph{the system Energy Efficiency}.
\subsection{Link Energy Efficiency and User Energy Efficiency}
\emph{Definition 1} (Link Energy Efficiency): The EE of link $i$ of user $k$, for $i\in \mathcal{M}_k$, $k=1, ..,K$, is defined as the ratio of the weighted achievable rate of the user on this link over the consumed power associated with this link, i.e.,
\begin{eqnarray}\label{eq11}
ee_{k,i}=\frac{\omega_kB\log_{2}\left(1+\frac{p_{k,i}g_{k,i}}{\Gamma\sigma^2}\right)}{\frac{p_{k,i}}{\xi}+ P_{{\rm{dyn}},k}+ P_{{\rm{dyn}},0}},
\end{eqnarray}
where the link-level power consumption counts the transmission power of the user over the link, per-link dynamic circuit power of the user and the AP, respectively.
It is easy to prove that this fractional type function have the stationary point which is also the optimal point \cite{Boyd}. By setting the derivative of $ee_{k,i}$ with respect to $p_{k,i}$ to zero, we obtain that the optimal power value ${p}_{k,i}$ and the optimal link EE under peak power constraint satisfies
\begin{align}\label{eq13}
p^*_{k,i}=\left[\frac{ B\xi \omega_k}{ ee^*_{k,i}\ln2}-\frac{\Gamma\sigma^2}{g_{k,i}}\right]^{P^{k,i}_{\mathop{\max}}}_0, \forall\, k, i\in \mathcal{M}_k,
\end{align}
where $[x]^a_b\triangleq \min\left\{\max\{x,b\},a\right\}$.
Note that $\frac{ B\xi \omega_k}{ ee^*_{k,i}\ln2}>\frac{\Gamma\sigma^2}{g_{k,i}}$, i.e.,
$p^*_{k,i}>0$ always holds for $ee^*_{k,i}$, since otherwise $ee^*_{k,i}$ would be zero.
Based on (\ref{eq11}) and (\ref{eq13}), the numerical values of ${ee}^*_{k,i}$ and $p_{k,i}^*$ can be easily obtained by the bisection method.
\emph{Definition 2} (User Energy Efficiency): The EE of user $k$, for $k=1,...,K$, is defined as the ratio of the weighted total achievable rate of the user on all its preassigned radio links over the total power consumption associated with this user, i.e.,
\begin{align}
EE_{k}=\frac{\omega_k\sum_{i\in\mathcal{M}_k} B\log_{2}\left(1+\frac{p_{k,i}g_{k,i}}{\Gamma\sigma^2}\right)}{ \frac{\sum_{i\in\mathcal{M}_k} p_{k,i}}{\xi}+n_k^o( P_{{\rm{dyn}}, k}+ P_{{\rm{dyn}},0})+P_{{\rm{sta}}, k}},
\end{align}
where the user-level power consumption counts the total transmission power of the user, the overall circuit power of the user and the dynamic processing power of the AP related to this user.
Now, we find the optimal power control to maximize the user EE. The problem is formulated as
\begin{align}\label{eq14}
\mathop {\max }\limits_{\{p_{k,i}\}} ~~~ &~~~~~~ EE_k \nonumber \\
\text{s.t.}~~~~~ & n_k^o=\sum_{i\in \mathcal{M}_k} \mathcal{I}(p_{k,i}), ~~ 1\leq k \leq K, i\in \mathcal{M}_k, \nonumber \\
~~~& p_{k,i}\leq P^{k,i}_{\mathop{\max}}, ~~ 1\leq k \leq K, i\in \mathcal{M}_k, \nonumber \\
~~~& p_{k,i} \geq 0, ~~~~ 1\leq k \leq K, i\in \mathcal{M}_k.
\end{align}
Define $\Phi_k$ as the set of active links for user $k$ and then $n^o_k$ is the cardinality of $\Phi_k$. Given any $\Phi_k$, it is easy to prove that $EE_{k}$ is strictly quasiconcave in ${p_{k,i}}$. Thus, similar to the link EE, the optimal power allocation under set $\Phi_k$ satisfies
\begin{align}\label{eq15}
p_{k,i}=\left[\frac{ B\xi \omega_k}{EE^*_k\ln2}-\frac{\Gamma\sigma^2}{g_{k,i}}\right]^{P^{k,i}_{\mathop{\max}}}_0, \forall\, k, i\in \Phi_k.
\end{align}
Note that if $p_{k,i}=0$, it suggests that this link should not be active in the optimal solution, but its corresponding circuit power $ P_{{\rm{dyn}}, k}+ P_{{\rm{dyn}},0}$ has already been accounted in calculating the total power consumption in (\ref{eq14}). Therefore, we have to obtain the set $\Phi_k$ in which all radio links are allocated with strictly positive powers in maximizing $EE_k$.
Let $EE^*_{\Phi_k}$ denote the optimal intermediate user EE of user $k$ when its current set of active links is $\Phi_k$, and then the value of $EE^*_{\Phi_k}$ can be obtained by (\ref{eq14}) and (\ref{eq15}). The next theorem provides a general condition for determining whether an arbitrary link should be scheduled.
\begin{theorem}\label{user}
For any link $i\notin \Phi_k$, if $ EE^*_{\Phi_k}\leq ee_{k,i}^{*} $, then there must be $EE^*_{\Phi_k}\leq EE^*_{\Phi_k \bigcup \{(k,i)\}}\leq ee_{k,i}^{*}$, and the link $i$ should be activated and added to $\Phi_k$; else if $ EE^*_{\Phi_k}> ee_{k,i}^{*}$, then there must be $EE^*_{\Phi_k}> EE^*_{\Phi_k \bigcup \{(k,i)\}}> ee_{k,i}^{*}$, and the link $i$ should not be activated and added to $\Phi_k$.
\end{theorem}
\begin{proof}
Please see Appendix \ref{apdix1}.
\end{proof}
The interpretation is also obvious: the new link $i$ should have a better utilization of the power than its user.
In what follows, we introduce how to obtain the optimal user EE based on the link EE, and the details of this procedure are summarized in line 1-14 of Algorithm 1.
Sort all radio links of user $k$ according to their link EE $ee^*_{k,i}$ in descending order, i.e., $ee^*_{k,1} \geq ee^*_{k,2}\geq... \geq ee^*_{k,n_k}$, and set the initial $\Phi_k={\O}$. Then we successively take one link from the order and judge whether it should be added to $\Phi_k$. Until some link is determined not to be activated or all links are activated, then based on the current $\Phi_k$, we can obtain the optimal user EE.
\begin{remark}
The optimality of the proposed procedure for maximizing the user EE is ensured by the ordering of the link EE as well as the conclusion of Theorem \ref{user}.
This idea opens up a new way to address the fractional-form EE maximization problem.
\end{remark}
\subsection{User Scheduling and Link Adaptation}
In this subsection, we show how to solve the original problem (\ref{eq10}) based on the link EE and the user EE.
For the explanation convenience, we first introduce two auxiliary sets. Denote $\Phi$ as the set of active links of all users, i.e., $\Phi=\{(k,i)\,|\,p_{k,i}>0, \forall i, k \}$, with its optimum denoted as $\Phi^*$. Denote $U$ as the set of scheduled users which have at least one active link belonging to set $\Phi$, i.e., $U=\{\,k\,|\,(k,i)\in \Phi, \forall k, i\}$. Apparently, $U$ can be sufficiently determined by $\Phi$.
Given the set of overall active links $\Phi$, and accordingly the set of scheduled users $U$, then $n_k^o$ can be readily calculated and
problem (\ref{eq10})
is simplified into the following problem
\begin{align}\label{eq141}
\mathop {\max }\limits_{\bm{p}} &~~\frac{\sum_{k\in U} \omega_k\sum_{i \in \Phi} B\log_{2}\left(1+\frac{p_{k,i}g_{k,i}}{\Gamma\sigma^2}\right)}
{\sum_{k\in U} \left( \frac{\sum_{i\in \Phi} p_{k,i}}{\xi}+P_{Ck}(n_k^o)+ n_k^oP_{{\rm{dyn}},0}\right)+ P_{{\rm{sta}},0}} \nonumber \\
\text{s.t.}\,&~~ 0< p_{k,i}\leq P^{k,i}_{\mathop{\max}}, ~~~ 1\leq k \leq K, i\in \Phi.
\end{align}
\begin{algorithm}[!hbpt]
\caption{Energy-Efficient Scheduling Algorithm}
\begin{algorithmic}[1]
\item
{\bf{for}} $k=1:K$\\
~~~Compute $ee^*_{k,i}$ for all $i\in \mathcal{M}_k$, by (\ref{eq11}) and (\ref{eq13}); \\
~~~~Sort all links of user $k$ in descending order of $ee^*_{k,i}$,\textcolor{white}{xxxx} \textcolor{white}{xx}i.e., $ee^*_{k,1} \geq ee^*_{k,2}\geq... \geq ee^*_{k,n_k}$; \\ \nonumber
~~~Set $\Phi_k={\O}$ and $EE_{\Phi_k}^{*}=0$; \\
~~~{\bf{for}} $i=1:n_k$\\
~~ ~\ \ \ \ \ {\bf{if}} \ \ $EE_{\Phi_k}^{*}\leqslant ee^*_{k,i}$ \ \ {\bf{do}} \\
~~ ~\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \quad $\Phi_k={\Phi_k\bigcup \{(k,i)\}}$ ; \\
~~ ~\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \quad Compute $p^*_{k,i}$ and $EE^*_{\Phi_k}$ by (\ref{eq14}) and (\ref{eq15}); \\
~~ ~\ \ \ \ \ {\bf{else}} $EE_{\Phi_k}^{*}> ee^*_{k,i}$ \\
~~ ~\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \quad ${\Phi_k}^{*} = \Phi_k$;\\
~~ ~\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \quad $EE_{\Phi^*_k}^{*} = EE_{\Phi_k}^{*}$; \ \ {\bf{return}} \\
~~ ~\ \ \ \ \ {\bf{end} }\\
~~~{\bf{end} }\\
{\bf{end} }\\
Sort all users (include both real users and virtual users ) in descending order of $EE_{\Phi^*_k}^{*}$, i.e., $EE_{\Phi^*_1}^{*} \geq EE_{\Phi^*_2}^{*}\geq,...,\geq EE_{\Phi^*_L}^{*}$; \\
Set $\Phi={\O}$, $U={\O}$, and $EE_{\Phi}^{*}=0$; \\
{\bf{for}} $k=1:L$\\
~~~~~{\bf{if}} \ \ $EE_{\Phi}^{*}\leqslant EE_{\Phi^*_k}^{*}$ \ \ {\bf{do}} \\
~~ ~\ \ \ \ \ $\Phi={\Phi\bigcup \Phi^*_k}$ and $U=U\bigcup \{k\}$ ; \\
~~ ~\ \ \ \ \ Obtain $p^*_{k,i}$ and $EE^*_{\Phi}$ by solving problem (\ref{eq141}); \\
~~~~~{\bf{else}} $EE_{\Phi}^{*}> EE_{\Phi^*_k}^{*}$ \\
~~ ~\ \ \ \ \ $\Phi^{*}=\Phi$;\\
~~ ~\ \ \ \ \ $EE_{\Phi^{*}}^{*}= \ EE_{\Phi}^{*}$; \ \ {\bf{return}} \\
~~~~~{\bf{end} }\\
{\bf{end} }
\end{algorithmic}\label{alg1}
\end{algorithm}
Obviously, problem (\ref{eq141}) can be verified as a standard quasiconcave optimization problem and thereby can be readily solved as (\ref{eq14}). Then our task is transformed to find the scheduled users and its corresponding active links.
Recall that in obtaining the optimal user EE, some links may not be activated and for all inactive links, use $(k', i')$ to denote them. Then we define each inactive link, say link $i'$ of user $k'$ as a virtual user $\ell$ just like the real users in the system, and let $\{(k',i')\}=\Phi^*_{\ell}$. Therefore, the EE of this virtual user $\ell$ is exactly the EE of link $i$ of user $k$, i.e.,
$EE^*_{\Phi_{\ell}}=ee^*_{k,i}$. In the rest, unless specified otherwise, term ``user" refers to both real users and virtual users. The difference between the real user and the virtual user is that each real user may contain several links and its circuit power includes the static user scheduling power $P_{{\rm{sta}}, k}$ as well as the link-dependent power
$ P_{{\rm{dyn}}, k}+P_{{\rm{dyn}},0}$,
while each virtual user only contain one link and its circuit power thereby is given by
$ P_{{\rm{dyn}},k}+P_{{\rm{dyn}},0}$.
We first sort all users in descending order according to the user EE $EE_{\Phi^*_k}^{*}$, i.e., $EE_{\Phi^*_1}^{*} \geq EE_{\Phi^*_2}^{*}\geq,...,\geq EE_{\Phi^*_L}^{*}$, where $L$ is the overall number of real users and virtual users. Then, we have the following lemma to characterize a property of the order.
\begin{lemma}
Assume that the virtual user $\ell$ is derived from the link $i'$ of the real user $k$. Following the descending order of the user EE,
the order index of this virtual user $\ell$ must be larger than that of its associated real user $k$.
\end{lemma}
\begin{proof}
According to the user EE, we have $EE^*_{\Phi^*_k}> ee_{k,i'}^{*}$, i.e, $ EE^*_{\Phi^*_k}> EE^*_{\Phi_{\ell}}$. Therefore, when they are mixed together to specify the order, the virtual user $\ell$ (inactive link) must be ranked after its corresponding real user $k$.
\end{proof}
This lemma guarantees that those virtual users (inactive links) of real user $k$ must be less likely to be active in the system EE compared with the user $k$ (the active links in the user EE), otherwise it may lead to the case that some link is scheduled finally in the system, but its associated real user is not scheduled, which contradicts the reality.
In the following, we explore the special structures of the system EE, the user EE and the link EE, and show how to obtain the optimal set $\Phi^*$.
In each round, we add one user to the set $U$ following the order and add all its active links in $\Phi^*_k$ to $\Phi$, respectively.
Then based on $\Phi$, the optimal system EE $EE_{\Phi}^{*}$ can be calculated as (\ref{eq141}). By the following theorem, we obtain the maximum system EE of problem (\ref{eq10}).
\begin{theorem}\label{system}
1) For any $\Phi_k^*\notin \Phi$, If $ EE^*_{\Phi}\leq EE_{\Phi^*_k}^{*}$, then there must be $EE^*_{\Phi}\leq EE^*_{\Phi \bigcup \Phi^*_k}\leq EE_{\Phi^*_k}^{*}$;
else if $ EE^*_{\Phi}> EE_{\Phi^*_k}^{*}$, then there must be $ EE^*_{\Phi}> EE^*_{\Phi\bigcup \Phi^*_k}> EE_{\Phi^*_k}^{*}$;
2) If any user $k$ is scheduled, then all active links in terms of the optimal user EE will also be activated in maximizing system EE.
\end{theorem}
\begin{proof}
Please see Appendix \ref{apdix2}.
\end{proof}
The first statement suggests that in each round, the comparison result of $EE^*_{\Phi}$ and $EE_{\Phi^*_k}^{*}$ is necessary and sufficient to determine whether the $k$th user can be scheduled to improve the system EE. While the second statement guarantees the optimality of the active links in maximizing the system EE.
This theorem guarantees the optimality of the proposed method which exhibits the concept of divide-and-conquer following the EE of three levels. The process of method is summarized in Algorithm 1 and it is easy to show that the complexity of the divide-and conquer approach overall has a linear complexity of the power control.
\subsection{Impact of Static Receiving Power on User Scheduling}
The next theorem reveals the relationship between the user scheduling and the static receiving power.
\begin{theorem}\label{pr0}
1) The optimal number of scheduled users in maximizing the system EE is nondecreasing with the static receiving power $P_{{\rm{sta}},0}$;
2) When $P_{{\rm{sta}},0}$ is negligible, i.e., $P_{{\rm{sta}},0}\rightarrow0$, TDMA is optimal for energy-efficient transmission;
3) When $P_{{\rm{sta}},0}$ is sufficiently large, all users will be scheduled for energy-efficient transmission.
\end{theorem}
\begin{proof}
Due to the space limitation, we only provide a sketch of the proof here. It is easy to show that the system EE is decreasing with the static receiving power $P_{{\rm{sta}},0}$. Then, from Theorem \ref{system}, we can show that less users would be scheduled for a higher system EE. A more detailed proof will be given in the journal version of this paper.
\end{proof}
The intuition is that when $P_{{\rm{sta}},0}$ is larger, the additional power consumption brought from scheduling users is less dominant, which makes it more effective to achieve higher EE.
If there is no additional power consumption for operating systems, i.e., $P_{{\rm{sta}},0}=0$, the optimal energy-efficient strategy is only to schedule the ``best'' user where the best is in terms of the user EE. It has the similar interpretation as that of the throughput maximization problem in TDMA systems: only the user with the best channel gain will be scheduled.
\begin{table}[!t]
\centering
\caption{\label{table1} SYSTEM PARAMETERS} \label{tb1}
\renewcommand\arraystretch{1}
\begin{tabular}{|c|c|}
\hline
{Parameter} & {Description} \\
\hline
Carrier frequency & $2$ GHz \\
\hline
Bandwidth of each radio link, $B$& $ 15$ kHz \\
\hline
Maximal allowed transmit power, $P^{k,i}_{\mathop{\max}}$& $ 25$ dBm \\
\hline
Static circuit power of the AP, $P_{{\rm{sta}},0}$ & $5000$ mW\\
\hline
Link dependent power of the AP, $P_{{\rm{dyn}},0}$& $45$ mW\\
\hline
Static circuit power of user $k$, $P_{{\rm{sta}}, k}$ & $100$ mW \\
\hline
Link dependent power of user $k$, $P_{{\rm{dyn}}, k}$& $5\-- 30$ mW\\
\hline
Power density of thermal noise variance & $-174$ dBm/Hz \\
\hline
Power amplifier efficiency, $\xi$ & $0.38$ \\
\hline
Cell radius, $r$& $ 1000$ m \\
\hline
Path loss model & Okumura-Hata \\
\hline
Penetration loss & $20$ dB \\
\hline
Lognormal shadowing & $8$ dB \\
\hline
Fading & Rayleigh flat fading \\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\end{table}
\begin{figure}[!th]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=3.5in ]{p_max_grid.eps}
\caption{The system EE versus the transmit power.}\label{transmit_power}
\end{figure}
From Theorem \ref{pr0}, it is also interesting to note that the number of users scheduled can not be guaranteed although the weights have been imposed on users, especially for the case with low static receiving power.
\section{Numerical Results }
\begin{figure}[!th]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=3.5in ]{throughput.eps}
\caption{The system throughput versus the transmit power.}\label{throughput}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure}[!th]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=3.5in ]{num_uscheduling_grid}
\caption{The number of scheduled users versus the static receiving power.}\label{user_number}
\end{figure}
In this section, we provide simulation results to validate our theoretical findings and demonstrate the effectiveness proposed methods. There are eight equally weighted users in the system and each user is configured with twenty radio links. Without loss of generality, $P^{k,i}_{\mathop{\max}}$ is assumed the same for all users and $\Gamma$ is assumed as 1. Other system parameters are listed in Table I according to \cite{zhang2010joint,xu2013energy} unless specified otherwise.
In \figref{transmit_power}, we compare the EE of the following methods: 1) Dinkelbach method: the existing optimal method \cite{ng2012energy2}; 2) EE Optimal: joint Tx and Rx optimization; 3) EE Transmitter: based on the Tx side optimization \cite{qing1}; 4) EE Receiver: based on the Rx side optimization \cite{qing1}; 5) Throughput Optimal: based on the throughput maximization. In \figref{transmit_power}, we can first observe that our proposed method performs the same as the Dinkelbach method, which demonstrates its optimality. Moreover, as the transmit power increases, the performance of the EE Optimal scheme first increases and then approaches a constant because of its energy-efficient nature, while those of the Throughput Optimal scheme and the EE Receiver scheme first increase and then decrease due to their greedy use of power.
It is also interesting to note that the EE Receiver scheme approaches the EE Optimal scheme in the low transmit power regime while it is more close to the Throughput Optimal scheme in the high transmit power regime.
A similar phenomenon can also be found in \figref{throughput} in terms of the system throughput. Moreover, the EE Transmitter scheme results in both low EE and spectral efficiency due to the fact that \emph{only one user is scheduled}, which has been theoretically shown in Section III-C.
\figref{user_number} further demonstrates our theoretical findings in Theorem \ref{pr0} which
characterizes the monotonicity of the number of users scheduled with $P_{{\rm{sta}},0}$. We observe that when $P_{{\rm{sta}},0}$ is negligible, the optimal energy-efficient strategy is to schedule only one user. As $P_{{\rm{sta}},0}$ increases, more users are scheduled to improve the system EE through boosting the system throughput.
\section{Conclusions}
This paper investigated the joint transmitter and receiver EE maximization problem in multi-radio networks. A holistic and dynamic power consumption model was established for the considered system. Then, the EE maximization problem is directly addressed from the fractional perspective, which results in an linear divide-and-conquer approach. Moreover, we pointed out that the static receiving power has an implicit interpretation for the optimal number of scheduled users. In the extreme case when the static receiving power is negligible, TDMA is the optimal scheduling strategy. In order to meet the QoS in practice, we then extended the propose method to solve the problem with minimal user data rate constraints, which exhibits good performance with linear complexity.
\appendices
\section{Proof of Theorem \ref{user}}\label{apdix1}
Denote ${p}_{k,i}^*$ as the optimal power corresponding to $ee^*_{k,i}$ by (\ref{eq11}) and (\ref{eq13}).
Also, denote $\hat{p}_{k,i}$ and $\check{p}_{k,i}$ as the optimal powers corresponding to $EE^*_{\Phi_k\bigcup \{(k,i)\}}$ and $EE^*_{\Phi_k}$ by (\ref{eq141}), respectively. Let $S_k \triangleq \{p_{k,i}|0 \leq p_{k,i} \leq P^{k,i}_{\mathop{\max}}, \forall \, i\in \mathcal{M}_k, k=1,...,K\}$ and $P_{k,i}(p_{k,i})=\frac{\Theta_tp_{k,i}}{\xi}+\Theta_{\rm{t}} P_{{\rm{dyn}},k}$.
Then, we have the following
\begin{eqnarray}\label{eq39}
&&EE^*_{\Phi_k\bigcup \{(k,i)\}} \nonumber \\
&=& \max_{\bm{p_k}\in S_k}\frac{\sum_{\ell=1}^i \omega_kr_{k,\ell}(p_{k,\ell})}{\sum_{\ell=1}^{i} P_{k,i}(p_{k,\ell})+P_{{\rm{sta}}, k}} \nonumber \\
&=& \frac{\sum_{\ell=1}^{i-1} \omega_kr_{k,\ell}(\hat{p}_{k,\ell})+\omega_kr_{k,i}(\hat{p}_{k,i})}{\sum_{\ell=1}^{i-1} P_{k,\ell}(\hat{p}_{k,\ell})+P_{{\rm{sta}}, k}+P_{k,i}(\hat{p}_{k,i})} \nonumber \\
&\geq& \frac{\sum_{\ell=1}^{i-1} \omega_kr_{k,\ell}(\check{p}_{k,\ell})+ \omega_kr_{k,i}(p_{k,i}^*)}{\sum_{\ell=1}^{i-1} P_{k,\ell}(\check{p}_{k,\ell})+P_{{\rm{sta}}, k}+P_{k,i}({p}_{k,i}^*)} \nonumber \\
&\geq& \min\left\{\frac{\sum_{\ell=1}^{i-1} \omega_kr_{k,\ell}(\check{p}_{k,\ell})}{\sum_{\ell=1}^{i-1} P_{k,\ell}(\check{p}_{k,\ell})+P_{{\rm{sta}}, k}},\frac{ \omega_kr_{k,i}({p}_{k,i}^*)}{P_{k,i}({p}_{k,i}^*)} \right\} \nonumber \\
&=& \min\left\{EE^*_{\Phi_k}, ee^*_{k,i}\right\}.
\end{eqnarray}
On the other hand,
\begin{eqnarray}\label{eq391}
&&EE^*_{\Phi_k\bigcup \{(k,i)\}} \nonumber \\
&=& \frac{\sum_{\ell=1}^{i-1} \omega_kr_{k,\ell}(\hat{p}_{k,\ell})+ \omega_kr_{k,i}(\hat{p}_{k,i})}{\sum_{\ell=1}^{i-1} P_{k,\ell}(\hat{p}_{k,\ell})+P_{{\rm{sta}}, k}+P_{k,i}(\hat{p}_{k,i})} \nonumber \\
&\leq& \max\left\{\frac{\sum_{\ell=1}^{i-1} \omega_kr_{k,\ell}(\hat{p}_{k,\ell})}{\sum_{\ell=1}^{i-1} P_{k,\ell}(\hat{p}_{k,\ell})+P_{{\rm{sta}}, k}},\frac{ \omega_kr_{k,i}(\hat{p}_{k,i})}{P_{k,i}(\hat{p}_{k,i})}\right\} \nonumber \\
&\leq& \max\left\{\frac{\sum_{\ell=1}^{i-1} \omega_kr_{k,\ell}(\check{p}_{k,\ell})}{\sum_{\ell=1}^{i-1} P_{k,\ell}(\check{p}_{k,\ell})+P_{{\rm{sta}}, k}},\frac{ \omega_kr_{k,i}({p}_{k,i}^*)}{P_{k,i}({p}_{k,i}^*)}\right\} \nonumber \\
&=& \max\left\{EE^*_{\Phi_k}, ee^*_{k,i}\right\}.
\end{eqnarray}
Based on (\ref{eq39}) and (\ref{eq391}), we have
\begin{equation}\label{keyneq}
\min\left\{EE^*_{\Phi_k}, ee^*_{k,i}\right\} \leqslant EE^*_{\Phi_k\bigcup \{(k,i)\}}\leqslant \max\left\{EE^*_{\Phi_k}, ee^*_{k,i}\right\}.
\end{equation}
By (\ref{keyneq}), Theorem \ref{user} can be easily proved.
\section{Proof of Theorem \ref{system}}\label{apdix2}
The statement 1) in Theorem \ref{system} can be similarly proved by an extension of Theorem \ref{user}, thus we omit them for brevity.
We now prove 2) by contradiction. Assume that user $k$ is scheduled, but the link $i$, for $i\in \Phi_k^*$, is not activated in maximizing the system EE, i.e., $(k,i)\notin \Phi^*$. In Theorem \ref{user}, we have shown that the sufficient and necessary condition of any $i\in \Phi_k^*$ is that $EE^*_{\Phi_k}\leq ee_{k,i}^{*}$. Thus, it follows that
\begin{align}\label{ap_eq1}
EE^*_{\Phi^*_k}\leq ee^*_{k,n^o_k} \leq ee^*_{k,i}, ~~ \forall i\in \Phi^*_k,
\end{align}
where $n^o_k$ also denotes the last link activated according to the link EE order since user $k$ overall has $n^o_k$ links activated.
On the other hand, since user $k$ is scheduled, we must have $EE^*_{\Phi}\leq EE_{\Phi^*_k}$ by Theorem \ref{system}. Combining with (\ref{ap_eq1}), it follows that
\begin{align}
EE^*_{\Phi^*}\leq EE^*_{\Phi^*_k} \leq ee^*_{k,n^o_k} \leq ee^*_{k,i}=EE^*_{\Phi_{\ell}}, ~~ \forall i\in \Phi^*_k,
\end{align}
where the virtual user expression is adopted, i.e.,$\{(k,i)\}=\Phi^*_{\ell}$.
According to 1) in Theorem \ref{system}, there must be
\begin{align}\label{t_eq2}
EE^*_{\Phi^*}\leq EE^*_{\Phi^* \bigcup \Phi^*_{\ell}}=EE^*_{\Phi^* \bigcup \{(k,i)\}}.
\end{align}
Therefore, from (\ref{t_eq2}), we can conclude that scheduling the link $i$ of user $k$ should be scheduled in maximizing the system EE, which contradicts the assumption that $(k,i)\notin \Phi^*$.
\bibliographystyle{IEEEtran}
|
\section{INTRODUCTION}
Mechanical forces play an important role in life processes, and many biological molecules are subjected
to forces. There are numerous examples from biology, where mechanical forces play an essential role in
a physiological context. Tensile forces acting on cells or bacteria originate from the dragging forces
imposed by the fluid flow \cite{AFMGaub}. A function of a biological motor might result in the generation
of large pulling force. For example, active force from myosin generates substantial mechanical stress on
structures of the sarcomere \cite{SarcomereGautel,ActinKasza}. Mechanical forces can also be generated
within the biological system. For example, leukocytes that patrol the blood flow in search of pathogens,
need to generate internal force to squeeze into in and pass through connective tissues \cite{SelectinMcEver}.
In addition to biochemical stimuli, cellular processes involving the cytoskeleton can be modulated in
response to external force \cite{ActinKasza}.
Structural arrangements of proteins have evolved in response to the selection pressure from biological
forces. The three-dimensional structures often exhibit a modular architecture composed of
discrete structural regions. These include semi-static structures such as actin filaments and microtubules,
and flexible structures such as muscle protein titin and fibrin clot \cite{FilaminsNakamura,TitinTskhovrebova,Weisel1}.
Titin, a giant $1 \mu m$ protein formed by linked immunoglobulin and fibronectin domains defines
the structure and elasticity of muscle sarcomere \cite{TitinTskhovrebova,SarcomereGautel}. Proteins
that form or interact with the extracellular matrix (ECM) have modular or multidomain architecture
\cite{CadherinLeckband,ECMRamage}. These include fibronectin fibrils, which form meshworks
around the cell, and integrins, which link the cell external and intracellular environment \cite{MTDWang}.
Fibrin polymerization in blood results in formation of branched network called a fibrin clot, which
must sustain large shear stress due to blood flow \cite{Weisel1,Weisel2}. Protein
shells of plant and animal viruses (capsids) are often made of multiple copies of a single structural unit
(capsomer). For example, the capsid of Cowpea Chlorotic Mottle Virus is an icosahedral shell comprised of
$180$ copies of a single ($190$ amino acid) protein \cite{CCMVSpeir}.
Physical properties of proteins have adapted to biological forces. In ECM assembly, fibronectin subunits
change conformations from compact to extended. The extent of assembly is controlled by cell contractility
through actin filaments \cite{FibronectinSingh}. Hence, tissue tension regulate matrix assembly. Virus
capsids should be stable enough to protect encapsulated material (DNA or RNA), yet, unstable to release
the material when invading their host cells \cite{VirologyRoos}. Hence, mechanical properties of virus
capsids are important factors in viruses' survival in the extracellular environment and cell infectivity.
Cell adhesion and migration rely on reversible changes in mechanical properties of cells. Spatial distribution
of internal tension in cell remodeling, derived from dynamic regulation of contractile actin-myosin networks,
correlates cell shape and movement \cite{ActinLieleg,ActinKasza}. In addition, many proteins have evolved
to act as ``force sensors'' to convert tension-induced conformational changes into biological signal
\cite{MTDWang}. For example, tissue deformation during mechanical stimulation alters the conformation of
ECM molecules. Filamins involved in mechanotransduction alter their structure in response to external
tension \cite{FilaminSutherlandSmith}. Proper communication between structural regions in multidomain
proteins is important for regulation. For example, dynamic coupling between the regulatory domain and the
ligand-binding domain in P-selectins is implicated in formation of force-activated bonds \cite{CatchHertig}
(``catch bonds'' \cite{Selectin}) with their ligands (PSGL-1).
Single-molecule experimental techniques such as Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) \cite{AFMGaub,AFMRief,Brujic1}
and optical trap \cite{OptTweezBlock,AFMRief}, have made it possible to study life processes at the level
of individual molecules. These experiments, which utilize mechanical force to unfold proteins or to dissociate
protein-protein complexes, have made it possible to probe the unfolding or unbinding transitions one at a
time \cite{ReceptLigandLitvinov}. In the context of protein forced unfolding, grabbing the molecule at
specific positions allows one to select specific region(s) of the molecule and to define the unfolding
reaction coordinate. Mechanical manipulation continues to provide a unique approach to quantify the unfolding
transitions in terms of the measurable quantities - the unfolding forces (constant velocity or force-ramp
experiment) and the unfolding times (constant force or force-clamp experiment). Consider a
force-clamp experiment on a multimeric protein $D_n$ formed by head-to-tail connected identical domains
($D$'s). The protein is subjected to the external pulling force, and each unfolding transition causes
an increase in the chain length, $\Delta Y$. As a result, the total length of the
polypeptide chain $Y$ shows the characteristic pattern of stepwise increases
($\Delta Y$'s), which mark sequential unfolding transitions in protein domains.
The goal of statistical analysis and modeling of force spectroscopy data is to obtain accurate
information about the physical characteristics of protein domains. Yet, due to inherent limitations in the
current experimental resolution, there is no direct way of attributing the times of transitions to the
protein domains or structural regions where these transitions have occurred. We only have partial or
incomplete observation of the system. Said differently, it is not possible to determine which specific domain
has unfolded at any time since any domain can unfold at any given time. Consider the simplest case of the
dimer $WW$$-$$WW$ of the $WW$ domain, presented in Fig.~1. There are two possible scenarios of
unfolding. In the first pathway, the first domain ($WW_1$) unfolds first and the second domain ($WW_2$)
unfolds second. In the second pathway, the order of unfolding is reversed. In an experimental measurement,
what is being recorded is the first unfolding time ($t_{1:2}$) and the second unfolding time ($t_{2:2}$)
in a sequence of two observations, and it is impossible to tell which domain has unfolded first or second.
Hence, the first unfolding times ($t_{1:2}$) and the second unfolding times ($t_{2:2}$) involve
contributions from the first domain $WW_1$, which unfolds at time $t_1$, and the second domain $WW_2$, which
unfolds at time $t_2$. Can we obtain domain-specific information from the experimental data?
The first step is to understand the nature of the random variables measured. In a constant force experiment
on an $n$-domain protein ($D_1$$-$$D_2$$-$$\ldots$$D_n$), individual domains unfold one
after another but any domain can unfold at any given time. The observed unfolding times are ordered, i.e. they
comprise a set of ordered time variates, also known as Order statistics \cite{Gumbel,David}. Hence, what is being
measured are the ``time-ordered data'' $t_{1:n},t_{2:n},\ldots,t_{n:n}$, where $t_{r:n}$ is the $r$-th unfolding
time ($r$$=$$1,2,\ldots,n$) (in a sequence of $n$ observations). These are different from the (hidden)
``parent data'' $t_1,t_2,\ldots,t_n$ with $t_i$ being the unfolding time of the $i$-th domain
($D_i$, $i$$=$$1,2,\ldots,n$), which contain information about the individual protein domains
($D_1,D_2,\ldots,D_n$). Hence, the question becomes - can we solve an inverse problem, namely, can
we perform the inference of the parent distributions of unfolding times from the distributions of (observed)
ordered unfolding times?
The $r$-th order statistic is characterized by the cumulative distribution functions (cdf's) $P_{r:n}(t)$,
and the probability density functions (pdf's) $p_{r:n}(t)$ of the $r$-th unfolding time,
$r$$=$$1,2,\dots,n$, in a sequence of $n$ observations (for $n$ domains). The $r$-th order statistic cdf
$P_{r:n}(t)$ is the probability that the $r$-th unfolding time $t_r$ does not exceed
$t$, i.e., $P_{r:n}(t)$$=$$Prob(t_r\leq t)$, and the $r$-th order statistic pdf is
$p_{r:n}(t)$$=$$dP_{r:n}(t)/dt$ \cite{Gumbel}. In our example for the dimer $WW$$-$$WW$,
the first unfolding time ($t_{1:2}$) and the second unfolding time ($t_{2:2}$) both carry information
about the unfolding times for the first domain $WW_1$ ($t_1$) and for the second domain $WW_2$ ($t_2$).
In general, because the cdf $P_{r:n}(t)$ and the pdf $p_{r:n}(t)$
of the $r$-th order statistic depend on the parent cdf $P_i(t)$ and pdf $p_i(t)$
($i$$=$$1,2,\ldots,n$), it is possible, at least in principle, to resolve $P_i(t)$ and $p_i(t)$ from the cdf
and pdf of the order statistics, $P_{r:n}(t)$ and $p_{r:n}(t)$.
In our recent papers \cite{OS1,OS2}, we used Order statistics to solve the inverse problem for
the independent identically distributed ({\em iid}) random variables and for the independent non-identically
distributed ({\em inid}) random variables. The formalism presented in these papers
can be used to describe the physically non-interacting identical protein domains ($D$'s) forming a multimeric
protein $D$$-$$D$$-$$\ldots$$-$$D$ ({\em iid} case), and the non-interacting non-identical domains ($D_i$'s,
$i$$=$$1,2,\ldots,n$) forming a multi-domain protein $D_1$$-$$D_2$$-$$\ldots$$-$$D_n$ ({\em inid} case) \cite{OS1}.
We have designed rigorous statistical tools for assessing the independence of the parent forced unfolding
times ($t_i$) and the equality of the parent pdfs of unfolding times ($p_i(t)$) from the observed ordered
unfolding times ($t_{r:n}$) \cite{OS2}. These statistical tests can be utilized to classify the parent unfolding
times and to detect correlated unfolding transitions in multi-domain proteins using experimental force spectroscopy
data. We have also extended Order statistics approach to describe the unfolding forces
measured in the constant-velocity (force-ramp) experiments \cite{OS3}. Order statistics inference
methods have been applied successfully to inverse problems involving, e.g., partialy observed queuing systems
\cite{Lee1,Lee2,Larson}.
Here we take a step further and present a new theory inspired by Order statistics, to solve
the inverse problem for the dependent identically distributed ({\em did}) random variables and for the dependent
non-identically distributed ({\em dnid}) random variables, using a squared-Gaussian parametric model of the
distributions of unfolding times. The developed formalism can be used to describe the mechanical behavior of
interacting (coupled) identical protein domains in a multimeric protein $D$$-$$D$$-$$\ldots$$-$$D$ ({\em did}
case), and interacting non-identical domains in a multidomain protein $D_1$$-$$D_2$$-$$\ldots$$-$$D_n$ ({\em dnid}
case). In the next Section, we describe our method. We focus on the order statistics pdf's, since these statistical measures can be easily estimated by constructing the histograms of unfolding times. We establish
a relashionship between the order statistics pdf's and the parent pdf's. In Section III, we describe the Self
Organized Polymer (SOP) model of the all-$\beta$-sheet $WW$ domain and Langevin simulations of the forced
unfolding of the dimer $WW$$-$$WW$ used as a model system (Fig.~1). The {\em in silico} experiments mimic
single-molecule measurements {\em in vitro} \cite{Fg1,Fg2,ProtofilamentsDima,C2DomainDima}. In section IV,
we perform a direct statistical analysis of the simulation output for dimer $WW$$-$$WW$ and describe the effects
of ``mechanical symmetry breaking'' and ``topological coupling''. In Section V, we compare several statistical
measures of the ''parent data'' for each $WW$ domain - the distribution of unfolding times,
the average unfolding time, the standard deviation, and the skewness of distribution, and Pearson correlation
coefficient, with the same measures obtained by applying Order statistics inference to the ``time-ordered data''.
We discuss our results in Section VI.
\section{ORDER STATISTICS INFERENCE}
Consider a vector of order statistics ${\bf T^\prime}$$=$$[t_{1:n}, t_{2:n}, \dots, t_{n:n}]^\dagger$,
in which the entries obtained in a single measurement correspond to the $1$-st unfolding time
($t_{1:n}$), $2$-nd unfolding time ($t_{2:n}$), $\dots$, and $n$-th unfolding time ($t_{n:n}$), the symbol
``dagger'' ($\dagger$) represents vector transpose ($t_{r:n}$ denotes the $r$-th unfolding time out of $n$
times for a protein $D_1$$-$$D_2$$-$$\ldots$$-$$D_n$ of $n$ domains $D_1,D_2,\ldots,D_n$). This same observation
${\bf T^\prime}$ can be also obtained by rearranging the components of another vector
${\bf T}$$=$$[t_1,t_2,\dots,t_n]^\dagger$ in the order of increasing time variates, which represents the
unfolding times of the $1$-st domain $D_1$ ($t_1$), $2$-nd domain $D_2$ ($t_2$), $\dots$, and
$n$-th domain $D_n$ ($t_n$) of the same multidomain protein $D_1$$-$$D_2$$-$$\ldots$$-$$D_n$. This is
because any domain can unfold at any given time with a non-zero probability and, hence, there are multiple
unfolding scenarios. Hence, on the one hand, we observe the ``time-ordered data'' ($t_{r:n}$), and on the
other hand, we have (hidden) "parent data" ($t_i$). We call this transformation map ${\bf G}$ and write
${\bf T^\prime}$$=$${\bf G}({\bf T})$$=$$[t_{1:n}, t_{2:n}, \dots, t_{n:n}]^\dagger$, where
$t_{r:n}$ is the $r$-th smallest component of vector ${\bf T}$.
Let vector ${\bf T^\prime}$ have the joint pdf $p_{\bf T^\prime}(t_{1:n}, t_{2:n}, \dots, t_{n:n})$
and let vector {\bf T} have the joint pdf $p_{\bf T}(t_1, t_2, \dots t_n)$. We seek to establish a
relationship between the pdf of the ordered data, $p_{\bf T^\prime}(t_{1:n}, t_{2:n}, \dots, t_{n:n})$,
and the pdf of the parent data, $p_{\bf T}(t_1, t_2, \dots t_n)$. Let us first assume, that
vector ${\bf T}$ can be written as ${\bf T}$$=$$[t_1,t_2,\dots,t_n]^\dagger$$=$$[x_1^2,x_2^2,\dots,x_n^2]^\dagger$,
where ${\bf X}$$=$$[x_1, x_2, \dots, x_n]^\dagger$ is an arbitrary random vector sampled from the Gaussian
distribution
\begin{equation} \label{eq:xPDF}
p_{\bf X}(x_1, x_2, \dots, x_n) = \frac{1}{(2\pi)^{n/2}\sqrt{|{\bf {\bf \Sigma}}}|}
e^{-\frac{1}{2}({\bf X}-{\bf \mu})^{\dagger}{\bf \Sigma}^{-1}({\bf X}-{\bf \mu})}
\end{equation}
where ${\bf \mu}$$=$$[\mu_1, \mu_2, \dots, \mu_n]^\dagger$ is the vector of the mean, and
${\bf \Sigma}$$=$$[\sigma_{ij}]_{i,j=1}^n$ is the covariance matrix of vector ${\bf X}$. Here, $|{\bf \Sigma}|$
denotes the determinant of matrix ${\bf \Sigma}$. We use squared-Gaussian distribution since it yields one-sided
exponential tail behavior and a non-zero skewness (typical of Gamma-process), but unlike Gamma distribution,
squared-Gaussian is simple to describe correlations of the data.
We next obtain the joint probability density function of the parent data ${\bf T}$ in terms of
the random variable ${\bf X}$, by using the following general transformation formula for the joint pdf of the
multivariate random variable:
\begin{equation}\label{eq:gtf}
p_{{\bf T}}(t_1, t_2, \dots, t_n)=\sum_{l}{p_{{\bf X}}(x^l(t_1, t_2, \dots, t_n))}||{\bf J}^l(t_1, t_2, \dots, t_n)||
\end{equation}
which is valid for a smooth many-to-one mapping from real space $R^n$ to real space $R^n$ with the non-zero Jacobian
of the inverse mapping. In Eq. (\ref{eq:gtf}), the sum runs over all inverse branches, $x^l(t_1, t_2, \dots, t_n)$,
with $l$ being the $l$-th branch, and $||{\bf J}^l||=\Bigl|\det\left[\frac{\partial x_i^l({\bf t})}{\partial t_j}\right]_{i,j=1}^n\Bigr|$
is the absolute value of the Jacobian of the $l$-th inverse branch. The total number of inverse branches for the
transformation $t_i$$=$$x_i^2$ ($i$$=$$1,2,\dots,n$) is $2^n$, and they can be written as $x_i^l$$=$$s_i^l\sqrt{t_i}$,
$s_i^l$$=$$\pm1$, $l$$=$$1,2,\dots,2^n$ ($i$$=$$1,2,\dots,n$). The Jacobian matrix for this transformation is
given by a diagonal matrix, with the $i$-th diagonal entry given by $J_i^l$$=$$\frac{s_i^l}{2\sqrt{t_i}}$.
The determinant of this matrix is $|{\bf J}^l|$$=$$\prod_{i=1}^n{\frac{s_i^l}{2\sqrt{t_i}}}$.
Substituting the expressions for $p_{\bf X}$ and $|{\bf J}^l|$ in Eq. (\ref{eq:gtf}), we arrive
at the joint pdf of the parent data expressed in terms of the pdf of vector ${\bf X}$:
\begin{equation}\label{eq:parentPDF}
p_{{\bf T}}(t_1, t_2, \dots, t_n) = \frac{1}{(2\pi)^{n/2}\sqrt{|{\bf \Sigma}|}}
\cdot \frac{1}{2^n\sqrt{t_1\cdot t_2 \cdots t_n}} \sum_{\bf s}{e^{-\frac{1}{2}
({\bf s}{\bf \sqrt{T}}-{\bf \mu})^{\dagger}{\bf \Sigma}^{-1}({\bf s}{\bf \sqrt{T}}-{\bf \mu})}}
\end{equation}
where the sum varies over all vectors of signs ${\bf s}$$=$$[s_1, s_2, \dots, s_n]^\dagger$ with the
entries $s_i$$=$$\pm$$1$, and ${\bf s}{\bf \sqrt{T}}$$=$$[s_1\sqrt{t_1},s_2\sqrt{t_2},\dots,s_n\sqrt{t_n}]^\dagger$
is the vector of inverse transformation written in terms of the components ($i$$=$$1,2,\dots,n$).
The final step is to obtain the pdf of the time-ordered data, $p_{\bf T^\prime}(t_{1:n},t_{2:n},\dots,t_{n:n})$,
in terms of the pdf of the parent data using Eq. (\ref{eq:gtf}). Consider the map ${\bf G}$, and use this map in
Eq. (\ref{eq:gtf}). Since ${\bf G}$ orders the components of vector ${\bf T}$ to produce the order
statistics vector ${\bf T^\prime}$$=$$[t_{1:n},t_{2:n},\dots,t_{n:n}]^\dagger$, the inverse branches
of ${\bf G}$ are all possible permutations, $\kappa$, of the components of vector ${\bf T^\prime}$.
In the case of $n$ domains, there are a total of $n!$ possible rearrangements of $n$ components and,
hence, $n!$ of the inverse branches of ${\bf G}$. Since the Jacobian of the permutation transformation
is either $+1$ or $-1$, the formula connecting the joint pdf of the order statistics data and the joint
pdf of the parent data reads:
\begin{eqnarray}\label{eq:orderStatPDF}
p_{{\bf T}^\prime}(t_{1:n}, t_{2:n}, \dots, t_{n:n})
& = & \sum_{\kappa}{p_{{\bf T}}(t_{\kappa(1):n}, t_{\kappa(2):n}, \dots, t_{\kappa(n):n})}\nonumber\\
& = & \frac{1}{(2\pi)^{n/2}\sqrt{|{\bf \Sigma}|}} \cdot \frac{1}{2^n\sqrt{t_{1:n}\cdot t_{2:n}\cdots t_{n:n}}}
\sum_{\kappa}{\sum_{\bf s}{e^{-\frac{1}{2}({\bf s}{\bf \sqrt{T_\kappa}}-{\bf \mu})^{\dagger}
{\bf \Sigma}^{-1}({\bf s}{\bf \sqrt{T_\kappa}}-{\bf \mu})}}}
\end{eqnarray}
where the symbolic summation is performed over all possible permutations of components of vector ${\bf T^\prime}$,
denoted as $\kappa$, and $\bf s\sqrt{T_\kappa}$$=$$[s_1\sqrt{t_{\kappa(1):n}},
s_2\sqrt{t_{\kappa(2):n}}, \dots, s_n\sqrt{t_{\kappa(n):n}}]^\dagger$ is a vector of inverse branches
of transformations $t_i$$=$$x_i^2$ and ordering {\bf G}. The expression in the second line of Eq. (\ref{eq:orderStatPDF})
has $2n+n(n-1)/2$ unknown parameters, including $n$ components of the vector of the mean
(${\bf \mu}$$=$$[\mu_1,\mu_2,\dots,\mu_n]^\dagger$), and $(n^2+n)/2$ entries of the symmetric covariance
matrix (${\bf \Sigma}$$=$$[\sigma_{ij}]_{i,j=1}^n$). One can use any estimation method to determine these
parameters. Given the statistics of $x_i$ ($\mu_i$ and $\sigma_{ij}$), we can
obtain the pdf ($p_i(t)$), the mean ($\mu_i^T$), the variance ($\sigma_i^T$), the skewness of
distribution ($\gamma_i^T$) for $t_i$ ($i$$=$$1,2$), and estimate pair-wise correlations ($\rho_{ij}^T$)
using the analysis in the Appendix, which treats the case of $i,j$$=$$1,2$.
\section{FORCE-CLAMP MEASUREMENTS {\em in silico}}
\subsection{Computer model of dimer $WW$$-$$WW$}
We used the $C_\alpha$-based Self Organized Polymer (SOP) model of the polypeptide chain \cite{SOP0}
to describe the dimer $WW$$-$$WW$ formed by the all-$\beta$-sheet $WW$ domains (Fig.~1). The $WW$ domain
has $34$ amino acid residues (Protein Data Bank (PDB) entry 1PIN \cite{WW1}). The mechanical unraveling
of $WW$ is described by the single-step kinetics of unfolding, $F \rightarrow U$, from the folded state
$F$ to the unfolded state $U$. The dimer $WW$$-$$WW$ was constructed by connecting the N- and C-termini
of the adjacent $WW$ domain using flexible linkers of two and four neutral residues (Fig.~1).
Each residue in $WW$$-$$WW$ was represented by its $C_\alpha$-atom with the $C_\alpha$$-$$C_\alpha$
covalent bond distance of $a$$=$$3.8 \AA$ (peptide bond length).
The molecular potential energy of a protein conformation, specified in terms of the residue coordinates
$\{{\bf r}_i\}$, $i$$=$$1,2,\dots,M$, is given by
\begin{eqnarray}\label{eq:sop}
V_{MOL} & = & V_{FENE}+V^{ATT}_{NB}+V^{REP}_{NB}\nonumber\\
& = &-\sum_{i=1}^{M-1}{\frac{k}{2}R_0^2\log{\left(1-\frac{\left(r_{i,i+1}-r^0_{i,i+1}\right)^2}{R_0^2}\right)}}\nonumber\\
& + & \sum_{i=1}^{M-3}\sum_{j=i+3}^{M}\varepsilon_h\left[\left(\frac{r^{0}_{ij}}{r_{ij}}\right)^{12}-2
\left(\frac{r^{0}_{ij}}{r_{ij}}\right)^{6}\right]\Delta_{ij}\nonumber\\
& + & \sum_{i=1}^{M-2}\varepsilon_l\left(\frac{\sigma}{r_{i,i+1}}\right)^{6} + \sum_{i=1}^{M-3}\sum_{j=i+3}^{M}
\varepsilon_l\left(\frac{r^{0}_{ij}}{r_{ij}}\right)^{6}(1-\Delta_{ij})
\end{eqnarray}
where the distance between any two interacting residues $i$ and $i$$+$$1$ is $r_{i,i+1}$, whereas
$r^0_{i,i+1}$ is its value in the native structure. The first term in Eq. (\ref{eq:sop}) is the
FENE potential, which describes the chain connectivity; $R_0$$=$$2 \AA$ is the tolerance in the
change of a covalent bond ($k$$=$$1.4 N/m$). The second term is the Lennard-Jones potential
($V_{NB}^{ATT}$), which accounts for the native interactions. We assumed that if the non-covalently
linked residues $i$ and $j$ ($|i-j|$$>$$2$) are within the cutoff distance in the native state $r_C$$=$$8.0 \AA$,
then $\Delta_{ij}$$=$$1$ and zero otherwise. We used a uniform value of $\varepsilon_h$$=$$1.5 kcal/mol$,
which specifies the strength of the non-bonded interactions. All the non-native interactions were
treated as repulsive ($V_{NB}^{REP}$). An additional constraint was imposed on the bond angle between
residues $i$, $i$$+$$1$, and $i$$+$$2$ by including the repulsive potential with parameters
$\varepsilon_l$$=$$1 kcal/mol$ and $\sigma$$=$$3.8 \AA$, which quantify the strength and the range of
repulsion. To ensure the self-avoidance of the protein chain, we set $\sigma$$=$$3.8 \AA$.
\subsection{Simulations of forced unfolding of dimer $WW$$-$$WW$}
The unfolding dynamics were obtained by integrating the Langevin equations for each particle position
${\bf r}_i$ in the over-damped limit, $\eta d{\bf r}_i/dt$$=$$-\partial V/\partial {\bf r}_i$$+$${\bf g}_i(t)$.
Here, $V$$=$$V_{MOL}$$-$${\bf f}$${\bf Y}$ is the total potential energy, in which the first
term ($V_{MOL}$) is the molecular contribution (see Eq. (\ref{eq:sop})) and the second term represents
the influence of applied force on the molecular extension ${\bf Y}$. Also, ${\bf g}(t)$ is
the Gaussian distributed random force and $\eta$ is the friction coefficient. In each simulation run,
the N-terminal $C_\alpha$-atom of the first domain ($WW_1$) was constrained and a constant force
${\bf f}$$=$$f$${\bf n}$ was applied to the C-terminal $C_\alpha$-atom of the second domain ($WW_2$)
in the direction ${\bf n}$ of the end-to-end vector of the dimer ${\bf Y}$ (see Fig.~1).
The Langevin equations were propagated with the time step $\Delta t$$=$$0.08$$\tau_H$$=$$20 ps$, where
$\tau_H$$=$$\zeta$$\varepsilon_h$$\tau_L/k_BT$. Here, $\tau_L$$=$$(ma^2/\varepsilon_h)^{1/2}$$=$$3 ps$,
$\zeta$$=$$50$ is the dimensionless friction constant for a residue in water ($\eta$$=$$\zeta m/\tau_L$),
and $m$$\approx$$3$$\times$$10^{-22} g$ is the residue mass \cite{LD1}. Pulling simulations were
carried out at room temperature using the bulk water viscosity, which corresponds to the friction
coefficient $\eta$$=$$7.0$$\times$$10^5 pN ps/nm$. We utilized the GPU-based acceleration to generate
the statistically representative sets of the unfolding time data \cite{GPU1,GPU2}. For each value of
constant force $f$$=$$80$, $100$, $120$, $140$ and $160 pN$, we generated two sets of
trajectories with $1,000$ trajectories in each set: one set for dimer of $WW$ domains connected by
the linker of two neutral residues, and the other for the four-residue linker. The unfolding time for
each domain (parent statistics) was defined as the first time at which the end-to-end distance of the
domain exceeded $90\%$ ($\sim$$11.25 nm$) of its contour length $L$$=$$33$$a$$\approx$$12.5 nm$.
Representative trajectories of the total end-to-end distance for the dimer $WW$$-$$WW$ obtained
at $f$$=$$100 pN$ and $f$$=$$160 pN$ are compared in Fig.~2, which also shows graphically the
definition of the first unfolding time $t_{1:2}$ and the second unfolding time $t_{2:2}$. We observe
a typical ``unfolding staircase'', i.e. a series of sudden step-wise increases in the
end-to-end distance of $WW$$-$$WW$ as a function of time. These mark the consecutive unfolding transitions
in $WW$ domains, which occur at the first unfolding time $t_{1:2}$ ($1$-st unfolding event) and at
the second unfolding time $t_{2:2}$ ($2$-nd unfolding event). The unfolding transitions are more
discrete at a lower force $f$$=$$100 pN$ (Fig.~2a) but more continuous at a higher force $f$$=$$160 pN$
(Fig.~2b). We remind that in experiment (but not in simulations), there is no way of knowing
which domain has unfolded at any given time, and the time-ordered data ($t_{r:n}$) are the only observable
quantities.
\section{TOPOLOGICAL COUPLING AND MECHANICAL SYMMETRY BREAKING}
To provide a basis for the Order statistics inference, we performed a direct statistical analysis of
the simulaiton output for $WW$$-$$WW$ generated at $f$$=$$80$, $100$, $120$, $140$, and $160 pN$
(parent data). The data sets contain $Q$$=$$1,000$ unfolding times for each force value and for each
linker length. First, we constructed the histogram-based estimates of the unfolding times for the
first domain ($WW_1$) and second domain ($WW_2$), which are compared in Fig.~3 (bin size was chosen
using the Freedman-Diaconis rule \cite{NonParam}). We calculated the average unfolding times $\mu_1^T$
and $\mu_2^T$ ($\mu_i^T$$=$$1/Q\sum_{j=1}^{Q}t_{ij}$, $i$$=$$1,2$), the standard deviations $\sigma_1^T$
and $\sigma_2^T$ ($\sigma_i$$=$$(E(t_i^2)-(\mu_i^T)^2)^{1/2}$, where $E(t_i^2)$ is the second moment
of $t_i$, $i$$=$$1,2$), and the values of the skewness of distributions $\gamma_1^T$ and $\gamma_2^T$,
and the Pearson correlation coefficient $\rho^{T}$$=$$\rho^{T}_{12}$. The skewness of the distributions
was calculated using the formula $\gamma_i^T$$=$$(E(t_i^3)-3\mu_i^T(\sigma_i^T)^2-(\mu_i^T)^3)/(\sigma^T_i)^3$,
where $E(t_i^3)$ is the third moment of $t_i$ ($i$$=$$1,2$). Pearson correlation coefficient was calculated
as $\rho^{T}$$=$$(E(t_1 t_2)-\mu_1^T\mu_2^T)/\sigma_1^T\sigma_2^T$, where $E(t_1 t_2)$ is the first
moment of the product $t_1 t_2$. These statistical measures are compared in Table~I and II for the case
of the linker of two and four residues, respectively.
The parent distributions of unfolding times are skewed, broadly distributed, and exponential-like
at low forces ($f$$=$$80 pN$) and become more narrowly distributed, and Gaussian-like
at high forces ($f$$=$$160 pN$; see Fig.~3). These changes become manifest when comparing
the values of $\mu_i^T$, $\sigma_i^T$, and $\gamma_i^T$, $i$$=$$1,2$ (see Tables~I and II).
Here, $\mu_1^T$ and $\mu_2^T$ decrease as $f$ is increased, because the applied force destabilizes the
native state of $WW$, and, hence, decreases their lifetimes. At low forces, dynamic fluctuations
are not suppressed and the unfolding transitions are more variable (stochastic), which is reflected in
the width of the distributions ($\sigma_i^T$). When $f$ is increased, fluctuations become less important
and the unfolding events become increasingly more deterministic (less stochastic), which results in
the decrease of $\sigma_1^T$ and $\sigma_2^T$.
Interestingly, we found that the unfolding times $t_1$ for the first domain ($WW_1$) and $t_2$ for the
second domain ($WW_2$) are uncorrelated at low forces, but become correlated (dependent) at a high force
($f$$=$$160 pN$). This is reflected in the values of the correlation coefficient $\rho^{T}$ (Table~I and II).
Hence, our results show that tension couples otherwise non-interacting protein domains forming a multi-domain
protein. Because this result could have been observed in the case of physically interacting protein domains,
e.g., through a common binding interface, we termed this effect the ``topological coupling'' to stress the
importance of chain connectivity (topology). Hence, our results indicate that under large
mechanical stress protein domains might become topologically coupled even in the absence of domain-domain
interactions.
Another interesting finding is that although the unfolding times for the first domain
$WW_1$ ($t_1$) and for the second domain $WW_2$ ($t_2$) are similarly distributed
at a low force ($f$$=$$80 pN$), these become more and more nonidenticaly distributed at higher
forces ($f$$=$$100$$-$$160 pN$). Indeed, the values of $\mu_i^T$, $\sigma_i^T$,
and $\gamma_i^T$ for $i$$=$$1,2$ are very similar at $f$$=$$80 pN$, yet, very different at
$f$$=$$160 pN$ (Tables~I and II). Hence, our results indicate that increased tension breaks
the mechanical symmetry. Indeed, identical protein domains $WW_1$ and $WW_2$ have very similar
mechanical properties at a low force, but these become distinctly different at higher forces.
\section{FROM TIME-ORDERED DATA TO PARENT DISTRIBUTIONS}
In force-clamp single-molecule experiments on multidomain proteins, experimentalists have no prior knowledge
regarding the type of random variables measured. Our results for the dimer $WW$$-$$WW$ indicate that the
mechanical force can topologically couple the non-interacting protein domains and can break the similarity
in their physical properties even when domains are identical. Using our classification
of random variables, the unfolding times for identical protein domains in a multi-domain protein might form
a set of {\em iid} random variables at low forces, {\em inid} random variables at the intermediate force level,
and {\em dnid} random variables at high enough forces. Hence, a unified approach is needed to analyze and
model the different types of random variables. Here, we describe the results of application of Order statistics
inference, developed in Section II, to characterize the forced unfolding times for the dimer
$WW$$-$$WW$ obtained for different values of applied constant force $f$$=$$80$$-$$160 pN$. The formalism
adapted for the two-domain protein is presented in the Appendix.
Because in a single-molecule experiment size of the data sample might be small, we picked at
random $330$ data points ($330$ pairs $(t_1,t_2)$) out of $Q$$=$$1,000$ observations from each data set.
Next, we ordered the data for each pair to generate ordered unfolding times as observed in experiment.
As an example for the dimer $WW$$-$$WW$ (linker of two residues), we present the
histogram-based estimates of the pdf's of the $1$-st unfolding time ($t_{1:2}$) and the $2$-nd unfolding time
($t_{2:2}$), obtained at $f$$=$$80$, $120$, and $160 pN$ in Fig.~4. The histograms of the ordered
unfolding times are markedly different in terms of their overall shape, width, and position of the maximum
(most probable unfolding time). That the maximum for $t_{2:2}$ corresponds to longer times
compared to the maximum for $t_{1:2}$ is not unexpected, since, by construction, $t_{1:2}$$<$$t_{2:2}$.
A surprising element is that the histograms of $t_{2:2}$ have longer tais, which means that fluctuations
play a more important role in the unfolding transitions that occur later in time. According to
our formalism, the time-ordered data correspond to vectors of order statistics ${\bf T'}$$=$$[t_{1:2},t_{2:2}]^{\dagger}$
described by the joint pdf $p_{{\bf T}'}(t_{1:2},t_{2:2})$ (see Eq. (\ref{eq:orderStat2dPDF})).
The model for two-domain protein $WW$$-$$WW$ has five unknown parameters: the average values
$\mu_1$ and $\mu_2$, the standard deviations $\sigma_{11}$ and $\sigma_{22}$, and the covariance $\sigma_{12}$.
These describe the statistics of vector ${\bf X}$$=$$[x_1,x_2]^{\dagger}$. Once determined, they can be
used to describe the parent statistics of vector ${\bf T}$$=$$[t_1,t_2]^{\dagger}$. We employed
the Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE) to obtain the vector of parameters,
${\bf \theta}$$=$$(\mu_1,\mu_2,\sigma_{11},\sigma_{22},\sigma_{12})$. The likelihood function for the pdf
given by Eq. (\ref{eq:orderStat2dPDF}) is
$L(\theta)$$=$$\prod_{j=1}^{330}p_{\bf T^\prime }(\{t_{1:n},t_{2:n}\}_j|{\bf \theta})$, but in the model
calculations we used the log-likelihood function,
$\log [L(\theta)]$$=$$\sum_{j=1}^{330}\log p_{\bf T^\prime}(\{t_{1:n},t_{2:n}\}_j|{\bf \theta})$, to
obtain the values of $\mu_1$, $\mu_2$, $\sigma_{11}$, $\sigma_{22}$, and $\sigma_{12}$.
These quantities and Eqs. (\ref{eq:mean}), (\ref{eq:std}), (\ref{eq:skew}), and (\ref{eq:correl}) were
then used to obtain the parent statistics: the average quantities $\mu_1^T$ and $\mu_2^T$, the standard
deviations $\sigma_1^T$ and $\sigma_2^T$, the skewness coefficients $\gamma_1^T$ and $\gamma_2^T$, and the
correlation coefficient $\rho^T$ (see Appendix). Finally, the closed-form expressions for the
parent pdf's of unfolding times $p_1(t)$ and $p_2(t)$ were obtained by integrating out
$t_2$ and $t_1$, respectively, in Eq. (\ref{eq:parent2dPDFsimpl}) for the joint parent pdf:
\begin{equation}\label{eq:pdfParenti}
p_i(t)=\frac{1}{\sigma_{ii}\sqrt{2\pi}}\cdot\frac{1}{2\sqrt{t}}\Bigl[\exp(-\frac{(\sqrt{t} - \mu_i)^2}
{2\sigma_{ii}^2}) + \exp(-\frac{(\sqrt{t} + \mu_i)^2}{2\sigma_{ii}^2}\Bigr]\text{, }i=1,2
\end{equation}
Statistical measures of the parent unfolding times (parent statistics of vector ${\bf T}$$=$$[t_1,t_2]^{\dagger}$),
$\mu_1^T$, $\mu_2^T$, $\sigma_1^T$, $\sigma_2^T$, and $\rho^T$, obtained by applying Order statistics
inference to the order-statistics data, are compared with the same quantities, obtained from a direct
statistical analysis of the parent data, in Tables~I and II. The theoretical curves of the
parent distributions $p_i(t)$ ($i=1,2$), generated by substituting the values of $\mu_1$,
$\mu_2$, $\sigma_{11}$ and $\sigma_{22}$ (statistics of vector ${\bf X}$$=$$[x_1,x_2]^{\dagger}$)
into Eq.(\ref{eq:pdfParenti}), are overlaid in Fig.~3 with the histograms of the parent unfolding times.
We witness a very good agreement between the histogram-based estimates and theoretical curves of the pdf's
of the parent unfolding times for both domains $WW_1$ and $WW_2$ and for all force values $f$$=$$80$,
$120$, and $160 pN$ in terms of the overall shape and position of the maximum (Fig.~3). In agreement with
simulations, our theory predicts that at high forces the second domain ($WW_2$), to which the force is applied
(Fig.~1), unravels on a faster timescale compared to the first domain ($WW_1$). Hence, our theory captures
the growing inequality of the time distributions for $WW_1$ and $WW_2$ at larger forces reflecting
the mechanical symmetry breaking. Comparing the values of $\mu_i^T$, $\sigma_i^T$, $\gamma_i^T$, and $\rho^T$,
obtained using Order statistics inference, with the ``true'' values of these quantities from a direct
statistical analysis, we see that the agreement is nearly quantitative for $\mu_i^T$ and $\sigma_i^T$ and
very good for $\gamma_i^T$ at low forces ($f$$=$$80 pN$). At larger forces ($>$$100 pN$),
the agreement for $\mu_i^T$ and $\sigma_i^T$ is very good, yet, the agreement for $\gamma_i^T$ is more
qualitative rather than quantitative. Importantly, Order statistics inference correctly captured the
mutual independence of unfolding times ($t_1$ and $t_2$) at low forces, which is reflected
in small values of Pearson correlation coefficient $\rho^T$ for $f$$<$$140 pN$. Order statistics
inference correctly predicts the emergence of topological interactions at higher forces (i.e. for $f$$=$$160 pN$),
for which the values of $\rho^T$ are in the $0.1$$-$$0.3$-range (Tables~I and II).
\section{DISCUSSION}
Single-molecule force spectroscopy has enabled researchers to uncover the mechanism of adaptation
of protein structures to mechanical loads \cite{AFMRief,RiboswitchBlock}. These experiments are now routinly
used to study proteins and other biomolecules beyond the ensemble average picture and to map
the entire distributions of the relevant molecular characteristics \cite{Mukamel1,Mukamel2}. Yet, existing
theoretical approaches for analyzing and modeling the experimental results lag behind. This calls
for the development of next generation theoretical methods, which take into account both the
complexity of the problem and the nature and statistics of experimental observables.
In the previos studies, we have demonstrated that the unfolding times observed in the constant force
(force-clamp) measurements on a multidomain protein $D_1$$-$$D_2$$-$$\ldots$$-$$D_n$ comprize a set of
the $r$-th order statistics, $t_{r:n}$ ($r$$=$$1,2,\ldots,n$) \cite{OS1}, and that the unfolding forces
observed in the constant velocity (force-ramp) measurements form a set of the first order statistic
$t_{1:n}$ in a sample of decreasing size ($n,n-1,\ldots,1$) \cite{OS3}. We have also developed
rigorous statistical tests for classification of random variables measured in these experiments
\cite{OS3}. Here, we developed an Order statistical theory to describe coupled proteins forming a multimeric
protein or proteins forming the tertiary structure within the same multidomain protein subject to the mechanical
stress. We focused on interesting new effects of tension-induced mechanical symmetry breaking
and topological coupling in multi-domain proteins formed by the physically non-interacting protein domains,
using an example of the two-domain protein $WW$$-$$WW$. However, our theory can also be used to characterize
the physico-chemical properties of proteins with strong domain-domain interactions, such as fibrin fibers,
microtubules, and actin filaments mentioned in the introduction. Strong interactions will translate into
large values of the off-diagonal elements of the covariance matrix (Pearson correlation coefficient).
Our approach is based on Order statistics inference, which proved to be successful at solving the inverse
problems. The approach can be used to accurately analyze, interpret, and model the results of protein
forced unfolding measuremens available from the constant force assays on multimeric and multidomain proteins.
One of the main results of this paper is that Order statistics inference enables one to analyze
and model the forced unfolding times for a multi-domain protein formed by noninteracting identical domains
({\em iid} case) and non-identical domains ({\em inid} case), and by interacting identical domains ({\em did}
case) and non-identical domains ({\em dnid} case). With little effort, the formalism can be extended to
analyze the results of constant velocity measurements. We applied our approach to analyze the results of
protein forced unfolding {\em in silico} for the dimer $WW$$-$$WW$ of the all-$\beta$-sheet $WW$ domains
\cite{WW2,WW3}. In simulations, one can access ``the parent data'' and ``the time-ordered data''. This
was used to compare directly the various statistical measures - the distributions of unfolding times, the
average unfolding times, the standard deviations, and the skeweness of the distributions, obtained from the
statistical analysis of the parent unfolding times for domains $WW_1$ and $WW_2$, and the same measures,
obtaineed by applying Order statistics inference to the time-ordered data. A very good agreement obtained
between the statistics of unfolding times from pulling simulations and from the theoretical inference validates
our theory. The presense of correlations is reflected in the inequality of the joint distribution to the
product of the marginals, i.e. $p_{\bf T}(t_1,t_2)$$\neq$$p_1(t)$$p_2(t)$
\cite{Mukamel1,Mukamel2}. In the bivariate case for just two domains, dynamic correlations between the
parent unfolding times $t_1$ and $t_2$ are contained in the off-diagonal matrix element $\sigma_{12}^T$ of
the covariance matrix ${\bf \Sigma}$ for vector ${\bf X}$$=$$[x_1,x_2]^{\dagger}$. Order statistics inference
correctly detected the absence of correlations at a small force ($f$$=$$80$, $100$ and $120 pN$),
and the presence of correlations at a large force ($f$$=$$160 pN$).
We found the mechanical symmetry breaking and topological interactions observed in a multi-domain
protein subject to tension. The growing asymmetry in the mechanical properties of otherwise identical
protein domains comprising a multi-domain protein, can be understood by considering an example of $WW$$-$$WW$.
When the pulling force is applied, it takes time $\tau_f$ for tension to propagate from the tagged
residue in domain $WW_2$ to the other domain $WW_1$. Hence, domain $WW_2$ is subjected to
the mechanical force for a longer time than domain $WW_1$ (Fig.~1). When force is large enough so that
the average unfolding time $\mu_f$ becomes comparable with $\tau_f$, tension propagation prolongs the
lifetime of the more distal domain $WW_1$, i.e. $\mu_1(f)$$\approx$$\mu_f$$+$$\tau_f$ versus $\mu_2(f)$$\approx$$\mu_f$.
This is reflected in the inequality of the distributions of unfolding times for domains
$WW_1$ and $WW_2$ (Fig.~3). But this same result would have been observed for a different two-domain
protein, say $D_1$$-$$D_2$, formed by the non-identical domains, e.g., the mechanically stronger domain
$D_1$ and mechanically weaker domain $D_2$, characterized by the differently distributed unfolding times.
The topological coupling can be understood using a concept of correlation length. In the
folded state, overall bending flexibility is determined by the mobility at the domain-domain interface.
Under low tension, the average inter-domain angle $\theta$ should show large deviations from the
$180^{\circ}$-angle, $\Delta \theta$, and the correlation length $l_c$ is short. Under high
tension, $\Delta \theta$ decreases and $l_c$ increases. This same result would have been observed for
the domains that interact, e.g., through their inter-domain interface. Domain interactions would have
decreased the mobility at the domain-domain interface, which, in turn, would have resulted in smaller
$\Delta \theta$ and longer $l_c$. The averaged squared deviations of the inter-domain angle can be linked
to the correlation length as $\langle \Delta\theta^2 \rangle$$=$$2d/l_c$, where $d$ is the inter-domain
distance. We estimated $l_c$ using the results of pulling simulations for $WW$$-$$WW$ (linker of two
residues). For $f$$=$$100 pN$, $d$$\approx$$1.2 nm$ and $|\Delta\theta|$$\approx$$30^{\circ}$, and
$l_c$$\approx$$1.8 nm$ is shorter than the average size of the $WW$ domain at equilibrium ($\approx$$3$$-$$4 nm$).
For $f$$=$$160 pN$, $d$$\approx$$2.8 nm$ and $|\Delta\theta|$$\approx$$15^{\circ}$. This results in
the three-fold increase in $l_c$$\approx$$5.2 nm$, which now exceeds the dimension of
$WW$ domain. Hence, under high tension $WW$ domains unravel in a concerted fasion, which
is reflected in the dependence of the unfolding times $t_1$ and $t_2$ at large forces (Tables~I and II).
To provide the reader with yet another glimpse of the hidden complexity underlying a seemingly trivial
problem of unfolding of a multi-domain protein, we performed pulling simulations for the trimer
$WW$$-$$WW$$-$$WW$, in which the force was applied to the third domain ($WW_3$). The histograms of
unfolding times for the first domain $WW_1$ ($t_1$), second domain $WW_2$ ($t_2$), and third domain
$WW_3$ ($t_3$) are compared in Fig.~5. Numerical values of the correlation coefficients for pair-wise
correlations $\rho^T_{ij}$, $i$$\neq$$j$$=$$1,2,3$, of the unfolding times are summarized in Table~III.
We see that the distributions of unfolding times are nearly identical and unimodal, reflecting the
mechanical symmetry, at a low $100 pN$-force; yet, the time distributions become increasingly
more different with the increasing tension. Indeed, the distributions of unfolding times for $WW_1$
and $WW_2$, but not for $WW_2$, develop the second mode at $f$$=$$140 pN$. The parent unfolding times
for $WW_1$ ($t_1$) and $WW_2$ ($t_2$), but not for $WW_1$ and $WW_3$ and not for $WW_2$ and $WW_3$,
develop correlations, which tend to grow with force (Table~III).
\section{CONCLUSION}
Intramolecular and intermolecular interactions involving proteins are at the core of virtually
every biological process. Here, we developed and tested a new Order statistics approach for detecting and
describing biomolecular interactions. Order statistics offers a new tool kit for accurate interpretation
and modeling of experimental data on multidomain proteins, multimeric proteins, and engineered polyproteins
available from single-molecule force spectroscopy. Looking into the future, we anticipate that Order statistics
based calculus of probability will play an important role when single-molecule techniques will expand into
new avenues of research such as folding of multi-domain proteins \cite{WangJACS}, protein folding
in cellular environment, and nanomechanics of protein assemblies (protein fibers, microtubules, actin filaments,
viruses, etc.) \cite{Fg1,Fg2}. Also, life processes in living cells are coordinated both spatially and temporally.
In this respect, Order statistics builds in causality into a theoretical description in a natural way.
Mechanical symmetry breaking and topological coupling might be related to the biological utility of proteins.
The structural design of multidomain proteins - number of domains, linker length, etc., carves out a
larger ``parameter space'' for the physical characteristics such as mechanical
strength, tolerance to fluctuations, correlation length, all of which are force-dependent. As we showed in
the paper, when tension is high enough, this design permits the ``mechanical differentiation'' of protein
domains, which become, in some sense, ``functional isoforms'' of the same structural unit. Protein systems
may have evolved to select certain modular architectures with the optimal physico-chemical properties for
efficient mechanical integration of forces. Also, the mechanical stress promotes coupling between structural
elements, which transforms a mechanically non-cooperative system into a highly cooperative one. This might
be a mechanism of information transfer over long distances to coordinate cell processes over the relevant
lengthscales and timescales \cite{MTDWang}.
\noindent
{\bf Acknowledgments:} This work was supported by the American Heart Association (Grant 09SDG2460023)
and by the Russian Ministry of Education and Science (Grant 14.A18.21.1239)
|
\section{Introduction}
Category discovery for unlabeled images is an important research topic with a wide range of applications such as content-based image retrieval~\cite{CoherentPhraseModel,NDRetrieval}, image database management~\cite{ImageHierarch,Zheng:MM04}, and scene understanding~\cite{I2T,GIST,Tuytelaars:IJCV09}. In this paper, we develop a unified framework to categorize scene images in an unsupervised manner. Specifically, with this framework, a batch of unlabeled scene images can be automatically grouped into different categories according to their contents, and we simultaneously generate the probability models for the categories.
We pose the unsupervised image categorization as a graph partition task, i.e., each generated partition indicates a potential category; then we employ a novel clustering sampling algorithm for inference, which is an extension of Swendsen-Wang cuts~\cite{swc} for greatly improving the inference efficiency. More specifically, the graph partition is formulated under a probabilistic framework that accumulates the generative models of all categories. Intuitively, the goodness of partitions is determined based on how well the learned models explain or generate the partitioned categories. Therefore, solving the optimal graph partition is equivalent to searching the maximum probability.
Natural scenes usually contain diverse image contents related with different types of visual appearance patterns, e.g., inhomogeneous (or structural) textures (buildings, cars, roads, etc.), and homogeneous textures (grasses, water surfaces, etc.)~\cite{LinGrammar}. Many studies~\cite{Mikolajczyk:PAMI05,Carneiro:CVPR03,Moreels:ICCV05} on designing image features show that the distribution-based descriptors (e.g., SIFT~\cite{sift}, HOG~\cite{HOG} and Textons~\cite{Textons}) and the binary operators (e.g., LBP and its variants~\cite{lbp,cs-lbp}) lead to state-of-arts on representing low-level image contents from different aspects. The former features tend to well describe the inhomogeneous textures, while the latter can be applied to capture highly random textures~\cite{LinPatch}. Therefore, in our method, we represent an image with a number of image patches at multiple scales. Two effective image features, the Histogram of oriented gradients (HOG)~\cite{HOG} and the Center-Symmetric Local Binary Pattern (CS-LBP)~\cite{cs-lbp}, are employed to describe the image patches. Specifically, we define two types of visual words (i.e., inhomogeneous textural words and homogeneous textural words), respectively, based on the two features. In literature, the significance of using combined features is also demonstrated in various vision tasks, e.g., near-duplicate image retrieval~\cite{CoherentPhraseModel,NDRetrieval}, object detection~\cite{HoGLBP}, and video tracking~\cite{LiuTracking,LinTrajectory}.
\begin{figure}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=3.5 in]{framework.pdf}
\caption{An overview of our framework. We formulate the problem of image category discovery as a graph partition task. In the left panel, the images are treated as graph vertices that are partitioned into subgraphs by turning off the graph edges. As shown in the right panel, the generative models for all partitioned categories are pursued simultaneously, and the models are also used to guide the inference of graph partition. The models are learned with two types of visual words: inhomogeneous textural words (ITWs) and homogeneous textural words (HTWs) defined based on two image descriptors.}
\label{fig:framework}
\end{figure}
Moreover, we adaptively select informative features (i.e., visual words) for each scene class, along with the categorization procedure. Several methods of image categorization\cite{Sheikholeslami:MM98,DaiCVPR10} show that different categories of images are probably captured by different class-specific features. Some discriminative learning algorithms (e.g., Adaboost~\cite{Adaboost} and SVM) perform very well in feature selection. However, they are not suitable for our task, since these algorithms rely on negative data and are often sensitive to outliers. In contrast, our framework employs a generative learning algorithm based on information criteria~\cite{inducingfeatures,activebasis}, so that we can fast pursue the generative models of categories without extra negative data.
The framework of our approach is illustrated in Fig.\ref{fig:framework}. The key contribution of this work is a general approach for automatic scene image categorization, in which the cluster (i.e., category) number is automatically determined. The generative category models are learned and updated simultaneously together with the categorization procedure. Our method is evaluated on several public datasets and outperforms the state-of-the-art approaches. It is worth mentioning that the graph partition and category models are closely coupled. Given a state of partition, we can learn (or update) the probability models while the category models can drive the partition to be refined.
\subsection{Related Work}
Most of the methods of scene image categorization involve a procedure of supervised learning, i.e., training a multi-class predictor (classifier) with the manually labeled images~\cite{Jeon:MM04}. Unsupervised image categorization is often posed as clustering images into groups according to their contents (i.e., appearances and/or structures). In some traditional methods\cite{Sheikholeslami:MM98}, various low-level features (such as color, filter banks, and textons~\cite{Textons}) are first extracted from images, and a clustering algorithm (e.g., $k$-means or spectral clustering) is then applied to discover categories of the samples.
To handle diverse image content, some effective image representations such as bag-of-words (BoWs) are proposed~\cite{LiFeifei:CVPR05,Sivic:objectcate}, and they represent an image by using a pre-trained collection (i.e., dictionary) of visual words. Furthermore, Lazebnik et al.~\cite{SPM} present a spatial pyramid representation of BoWs by pooling words at different image scales, and this representation effectively improves results for scene categorization~ \cite{BogOfTexton}. Farinella et al.~\cite{ConstrainedDomain} propose to build an effective scene representation based on constrained and compressed domains.
To exploit the latent semantic information of scene categories, Bosch et al.~\cite{Bosch06} discuss the probabilistic Latent Semantic Analysis (pLSA) model that can explain the distribution of features in the image as a mixture of a few ``semantic topics''. As an alternative model for capturing latent semantics, the Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) model~\cite{Blei:LDA} was widely used as well.
On the other hand, the category number is required to be predetermined or be exhaustively selected in many previous unsupervised categorization approaches~\cite{Tuytelaars:IJCV09,Liu:iccv2007}. In computer vision, the stochastic sampling algorithms~\cite{swc,LinGraphMatch,LinTrajectory} are shown to be capable of flexibly generating new clusters, merging and removing existing clusters in a graph representation. Motivated by these works, we propose to automatically determine the number of image categories with the stochastic sampling.
The rest of this paper is organized as follows. We first introduce the image representation in Section \ref{sec:imagerepresentation}.
Then we present the problem formulation in Section \ref{sec:formulation}, and follow with a description of the inference algorithm for unsupervised image categorization in Section \ref{sec:SWC}. Section \ref{sec:modellearning} discusses the learning algorithm for category model pursuit during the inference procedure. The experimental results and comparisons are exhibited in Section \ref{sec:experiments}, and the paper is concluded in Section \ref{sec:conclusion}.
\section{Image Representation}
\label{sec:imagerepresentation}
In this section, we start by briefly introducing the two effective low-level image descriptors used in this work, and define two types of visual words to construct the dictionary of images.
\begin{figure}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=3.4 in]{image-representation.pdf}
\caption{Image representation. We represent an image with the pyramid Bag-of-Words (BOW) model with two types of visual words that are, respectively, defined based on two image descriptors, i.e., HOG~\cite{HOG} and CS-LBP~\cite{cs-lbp}.}
\label{fig:image-representation}
\end{figure}
Previous works on designing image features can be roughly divided into two categories~\cite{LinPatch,HoGLBP}. The first one explicitly describes images with local gradients that are sensitive to structures (e.g., edges, boundaries, and junctions) and distinct textures (e.g., regions of clear details). The other one reflects uncertain differences among pixels and thus tends to be suitable for incognizable random textures (e.g., complex regions, and cluttered patterns). Thus, we utilize two typical image descriptors, i.e., HOG~\cite{HOG} and CS-LBP~\cite{cs-lbp}, respectively, in this work. Following the studies on image representation~\cite{LinPatch}, we refer a visual word $\omega$ as an ensemble or equivalence class of image patches that share the similar appearances. Letting $h(\cdot)$ be the histogram of an image feature, we define $\omega$ as,
\begin{equation}\label{eq:visualword}
\omega=\big\{\Lambda:h(\Lambda)=\hat{h}+\epsilon\big\},
\end{equation}
where $\hat{h}$ denotes the mean histogram of the image patches, and $\epsilon$ is the statistical fluctuation, i.e., a very small value. According to the two image descriptors, we define two types of visual words, inhomogeneous textural words (ITWs) and homogeneous textural words (HTWs), together with the two descriptors. The benefit of combining the two types of words will be demonstrated in the experiments.
To define ITWs, the input image domain is divided into a number of regular cells; at each pixel, a local gradient is calculated, and a histogram is pooled over each cell for different orientations. As illustrated in Fig.~\ref{fig:image-representation}, we decompose an image patch by $2 \times 2$ cells and quantize the orientations into $8$ angles. The dimension of this descriptor is thus $32$.
The HTWs are generated using the CS-LBP operator, which is computed at every pixel in the input image domain. It compares center-symmetric pairs of the given pixel and forms a binary vector. Given a pixel located at $x$ with $\hat{n}=8$ neighborhood pixels that are equally spaced on a circle of radius, as the example illustrated in Fig.~\ref{fig:image-representation}, the binary vector can be calculated as,
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:cs-lbp}
\begin{split}
\sum_{i=0}^{\hat{n}/2-1}b(n_i-n_{i+\hat{n}/2})2^i,\;\;\;\;\; b(x)=\begin{cases}1, & x>1\\0, & otherwise \end{cases}
\end{split}
\end{equation}
where $n_i$ and $n_{i+\hat{n}/2}$ correspond to the intensity scales of center-symmetric pairs of pixels. We compute the operator over all pixels in the domain; the obtained binary vectors can be converted into decimal strengths in the range of $[0,15]$. An example of a strength map is shown in Fig.\ref{fig:image-representation}. Since there are 4 cells divided, we further pool the strengths into a histogram with $16 \times 4 = 64$ bins, denoted as $h^b$.
Then we construct the dictionary to represent images with the visual words. In our implementation, we collect a large number of image patches from our database and compute the two descriptors for each, and group them into a batch of clusters (words) using the k-means algorithm. Thus, we obtain a dictionary $\mathcal{W}=\{\omega_i, i = 1, \ldots, m\}$, where $\omega_i$ is a visual word (i.e. ITW or HTW).
Given an image $\mathbf{I}$, we represent it with a spatial pyramid format, $ 1 + 4 \times 2 = 9$ blocks, i.e., $3$ scales (resolutions) and $4$ blocks in each scale except the top, as illustrated in Fig.~\ref{fig:image-representation} . In each block, the image domain is further decomposed into regular image patches that are mapped to the generated words. The image of a block $\mathbf{J}$ can be thus represented as a vector by using the dictionary, $(r_1(\mathbf{J}), r_2(\mathbf{J}), \dots, r_m(\mathbf{J}))$, where $r_i(\mathbf{J})$ is the response with the visual word $\omega_i$, and
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:word_response}
r_i(\mathbf{J})=\psi\bigg(\sum_{\Lambda\in{\mathbf{J}}} {\bf{1}}_{\omega_i}(\Lambda) \bigg),
\end{equation}
where ${\bf{1}}_{\omega_i}(\Lambda) = \{ 1 | 0 \}$, the indicator function, is used to indicate whether the image patch $\Lambda \in \mathbf{J}$ matches with $\omega_i$. The matching is measured by either of the two descriptors, $h^a$ and $h^b$, according to the type of word $\omega_i$. Thus, we use $\sum_{\Lambda\in{\mathbf{J}}} {\bf{1}}_{\omega_i}(\Lambda)$ to indicate the number of the visual word $\omega_i$ matching with the image block $\mathbf{J}$. Here $\psi(\cdot)$ is the sigmoid function $\delta(\cdot)$ that is characterized by a saturation level.
The image $\mathbf{I}$ is hence represented as $\mathcal{R}(\mathbf{I})$, by concatenating the vectors of all $9$ blocks.
\section{Problem Formulation}
\label{sec:formulation}
Given a set of unlabeled images $\mathcal{D}$, the goal of our framework is to categorize them into an unknown number of disjoint $K$ clusters, as
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:partition}
\Pi \!\!= \!\!\{\pi_1, \pi_2, \dots, \pi_K\},
\end{equation}
where $\cup_{k=1}^K{\pi_k}= \mathcal{D}, \pi_i\cap \pi_j=\emptyset,\;\forall i\neq j$.
We first build a graph $G_0=\langle V, E_0\rangle$, in which $V = \mathcal{D} =\{\mathbf{I}_1, \mathbf{I}_2, \dots, \mathbf{I}_N\}$ is the set of graph vertices specifying the images to be categorized, and $E_0$ is the set of edges connecting neighboring graph vertices. Then we solve the task of graph partition by cutting edges of the graph, i.e., generating disjoint subgraphs.
However, $G_0$ is a fully connected graph where the initial edge set $E_0$ could be very large. To reduce computational complexity, we shall compute a relatively sparse graph representation $G_0=\langle V, E\rangle$ by pruning edges, $ E \subset E_0$.
For any edge $e \in E_0$, an auxiliary connecting variable $\mu_e = \{ \text{on} | \text{off} \}$ is first introduced, which indicates whether the edge is turned on or off. Then we can define the edge connecting probability by measuring the similarity of two connected graph vertices. In our implementation, We define the similarity using the visual words $\mathcal{W}$. Specifically, for any vertices $v \in V$, we represent it as, $\mathcal{R}(\mathbf{I}) = ( r_1(\mathbf{I}), r_2(\mathbf{I}), \ldots, r_m(\mathbf{I}))$, where $r_i(\mathbf{I})$ is the response of the word $\omega_i$, as in Equation~(\ref{eq:word_response}). Thus, we can define the connecting probability $q_e$ for two arbitrary images $\mathbf{I}_s \in V, \mathbf{I}_t \in V$ as,
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:edgeprob}
q_e(s,t)= p (\mu_e = on | v_s, v_t) = \exp\bigg\{-\tau\big{[\mathcal{KL}(\mathcal{R}_s\| \mathcal{R}_t ) \big]}\bigg\},
\end{equation}
where we denote $\mathcal{R}_s = \mathcal{R}(\mathbf{I}_s)$ and $\mathcal{R}_t = \mathcal{R}(\mathbf{I}_t)$ for notation simplicity. $\mathcal{KL}()$ is the symmetric Kullback-Leibler distance for measuring two feature vectors. $\tau$ is a constant parameter. $q_e(s,t)$ should be close to $0$ if $\mathbf{I}_s$ and $\mathbf{I}_t$ naturally belong to different categories; the edge $e$ connecting $\mathbf{I}_s$ and $\mathbf{I}_t$ could be then turned off with high probability.
In practice, the edges with very low turn-on probability can be directly removed. Furthermore, we enforce each vertex can be only connected to at most $6$ neighbors. That is, for any vertex we keep $6$ edges with the highest connecting probabilities, and remove the other edges. Therefore, we obtain the sparse graph $G= \langle V, E\rangle$ where $E \subset E_0$.
With the graph representation, we pursue the generative probability models for all categories, as
\begin{equation}
\Phi = \{\phi_k(\mathbf{I}; W_k, \Theta_k), W_k \subset \mathcal{W}, k=1,\dots,K\} ,
\end{equation}
where $W_k \subset \mathcal{W}$ denotes the selected visual words for modeling the category $\pi_k$ and $\Theta_k$ includes the corresponding model parameters, i.e., the coefficients of words. The overall solution of image category discovery can be defined as,
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:solution}
S=\big(K, \Pi, \Phi),
\end{equation}
where $K$ is the inferred category number. The graph partition $\Pi$ and category modeling $\Phi$ can be solved together in a Bayesian inference framework. Assume that $p(S)$ and $p( \mathcal{D} | S)$ denote the prior model and the likelihood model, respectively. $p(S)$ can be simply modeled by incorporating an exponential function for $K$, as we impose no priors on $\Pi$ and $\Phi$. The likelihood model $p( \mathcal{D} | S ) = p(\mathcal{D} | \Pi , \Phi)$ can be defined as a product of generative models of all separated categories, as we assume the models are generated independently to each other. We can then define the posterior probability of solution $S$ as,
\begin{equation}\label{eq:postp}
\begin{split}
p(S | \mathcal{D}) &\propto p(S) p( \mathcal{D} | S) \\
& =\exp\{-\beta K\} \prod_{k=1}^K \phi_k(\mathbf{I}; W_k, \Theta_k),
\end{split}
\end{equation}
where $\beta$ is an empirical parameter for constraining the number of inferred categories. The category model $\phi_k(W_k, \Theta_k)$ is defined on the probabilistic distribution of the images in partition $\pi_k$. The models for all categories can be learned and updated during the procedure of image categorization.
\section{Inference for Image Categorization}
\label{sec:SWC}
The objective of inference is to search for the optimized solution $S^*$ by maximizing the posterior probability in Equation~(\ref{eq:postp}),
\begin{equation}
S^* = \arg\max p(S | \mathcal{D} ).
\end{equation}
This optimization is very challenging due to two characters in our problem: (i) the unknown number of partitions, (ii) no confident initializations, i.e., lack of the initial category models. Therefore, we employ the stochastic sampling algorithm instead of using deterministic inference algorithms.
In the research area of stochastic inference, cluster sampling is very powerful for simulating Ising/Potts graphical models, which is designed under the Metropolis-Hasting mechanism. Recently, Barbu and Zhu~\cite{swc} generalized the algorithm, namely Swendsen-Wang cuts (SWC), to solve graph partition in several vision applications. This algorithm enables us to effectively search for the maximum of posterior probability. It simulates a Markov chain containing a sequence of states in the solution space $\Omega$ and visits the Markov chain by realizing a reversible jump between any two successive states.
\begin{figure*}[!htbp]
\centering
\includegraphics[scale=0.85]{compositional-swc.pdf}
\caption{Illustration of the compositional Swendsen-Wang cuts algorithm for exploring a new solution state.}
\label{fig:mwayswc}
\end{figure*}
In the following, we first introduce the SWC algorithm, and then discuss an extension~\cite{DuanVideo} that greatly improves the inference efficiency. In general, the SWC algorithm iterates in two steps:
\begin{enumerate}
\item Generate the connected components ($CP$s) by probabilistically turning off connecting edges in the graph. Graph vertices connected together by ``on'' edges form a connected component (denoted by $CP$ for simplicity). Specifically, any two vertices in one $CP$ are linked by a path that consists of several edges. For arbitrary edge $e \in E$, we sample its connecting variable $\mu_e$ and decide it is turned on or off in this step. Then we obtain a few $CP$s, each of which is a set of connected graph vertices.
\item Explore a new partition solution by relabeling one of the $CP$s. Assume that the current partition solution is $S_A$ and we are exploring a new solution $S_B$. Given one randomly selected $CP$, the reversible operators are developed to re-assign its label. For example, the selected $CP$ can be merged into current separated category by receiving the same label with the category; otherwise, a new category can be created if the selected $CP$ receives a new label.
\end{enumerate}
We design the algorithm by the Metropolis-Hastings mechanism~\cite{swc}. Let $Q(S_A \rightarrow S_B)$ be the proposal probability for moving from state $S_A$ to state $S_B$, and conversely, $Q(S_B \rightarrow S_A)$ is the proposal probability from $S_B$ to $S_A$. The acceptance rate of the moving from $S_A$ to $S_B$ is,
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:acceptprob}
\alpha(S_A\rightarrow S_B)=\min\bigg(1,\frac{Q(S_B\rightarrow S_A)}{Q(S_A\rightarrow S_B)}\cdot\frac{p(S_B|\mathcal{D})}{p(S_A|\mathcal{D})}\bigg).
\end{equation}
For any state transition, the proposal probability usually involves two aspects: (i) the generation of $CP$, and (ii) the label assignment of $CP$. In our method, we make the $CP$ be assigned randomly with a uniform distribution, so that the proposal probability can be simplified. Thus, the ratio of proposal probability is calculated by,\begin{equation}
\frac{Q(S_B\rightarrow S_A)}{Q(S_A\rightarrow S_B)} = \frac{\prod_{e \in C_B} (1 - q_e)}{ \prod_{e \in C_A} (1 - q_e) },
\end{equation}
where $C_A$ denotes the edge set of edges that are probabilistically turned off for generating the $CP$ on state $S_A$, and similarly $C_B$ is the turning-off edge set on $S_B$. Here we name $C_A$ or $C_B$ as a ``cut'', following \cite{swc}.
To further accelerate the convergence of inference, we employ an improved version of the SWC algorithm that was originally proposed by us for video shot categorization~\cite{DuanVideo}. In the original algorithm, only one $CP$ is selected and processed in each step of solution exploration. In our method, we process a number of $CP$s together by coupling them into a combinatorial cluster. We thus regard this algorithm as the compositional SWC (CSWC). The CSWC algorithm is able to enlarge the searching scope during the sampling iterations, resulting in faster convergence than the original version.
Fig.~\ref{fig:mwayswc} illustrates the idea of CSWC. Given a current state $S_A$ ( as shown in Fig.\ref{fig:mwayswc} (a)), we can generate a number of $CP$s by turning off a few edges (as shown in Fig.\ref{fig:mwayswc} (b)). Then we construct a higher layer graph $\mathbf{G}$ based on these $CP$s. In this graph, we treat each $CP$ as a vertex, and link any two neighboring $CP$s by an edge, as shown in Fig.\ref{fig:mwayswc}(c). Within $\mathbf{G}$, we can generate the combinatorial cluster, where several $CP$s are selected.
Similar with the definitions in $G$, we calculate the turn-on probability $q^{CP}$ for an edge in $\mathbf{G}$ according to the similarity of two connected vertices (i.e., $CP$s), which can be derived from the original graph $G$. Specifically, given two neighboring $CP_i$ and $CP_j$, we measure their similarity by aggregating all the edges in $G$ that connects the vertices in $G$ belonging to $CP_i$ and $CP_j$, respectively. Thus, we define the edge probability in $\mathbf{G}$ as,
\begin{eqnarray}
q^{CP} &\propto& \big[ 1 - \prod (1 - q_e) \big], \\\nonumber
&& e=<s,t>, s \in CP_i, t \in CP_j.
\end{eqnarray}
By probabilistically turning off the edges in $\mathbf{G}$, we can also generate several connected components, and we regard them as combinatorial clusters to distinguish the $CP$s in $G$. In Fig.\ref{fig:mwayswc}(d), $4$ combinatorial clusters are generated. Different with the algorithm in \cite{DuanVideo}, we allow more than one combinatorial clusters to be selected in this step, and we assign labels to the them. In this way, we generate a new solution of graph partition accordingly. In the implementation, we enforce each combinatorial cluster being processed as a atomic unit, i.e., all original $CP$s in the compositional cluster will receive the same label. As Fig.\ref{fig:mwayswc} illustrates, to go from $S_A$ to $S_B$, the original SWC algorithm needs at least three steps, whereas for CSWC there is only one step. Note that we visualize only one selected CP in Fig.\ref{fig:mwayswc} (d) for illustration.
During the inference, the posterior probability $p(S | \mathcal{D} )$ can be changed, as we keep the category models updated with the categorization operation. Note that we only need to update the models of the categories where we add or remove images within them. We will introduce the category model learning in the next section.
\begin{algorithm}[!ht]
\caption{The sketch of our approach}
\label{alg:shotcate}
\KwIn{Image dataset $\mathcal{D}=\{\mathbf{I}_1,\dots,\mathbf{I}_N\}$, and visual words $\mathcal{W}=\{\omega_1, \dots,\omega_M\}$}
\KwOut{The categorization solution $S=\big(K, \Pi, \Phi\big)$}
1. Initialization\;
~~~~(1) Represent each image $\mathbf{I}_i$ with the visual words, $\mathcal{R}(\mathbf{I}_i)=\{r_1(\mathbf{I}_i),\dots, r_m(\mathbf{I}_i)\}$. \\
~~~~(2) Create the graph $G_0=\langle V, E_0\rangle$, and compute the turn-on probability $q_e$ according to Equation~(\ref{eq:edgeprob}), $\forall e \in E_0$. \\
~~~~(3) Remove the edges with low turn-on probability deterministically, and generate the sparse graph $G=\langle V, E\rangle$. \\
2. Repeat for cluster sampling\;
~~~~(1) At the current solution $S_A$, generate the $CPs$ by probabilistically turning off connecting edges in the graph $G$.\\
~~~~(2) Construct a high layer of graph $\mathbf{G}$ based on $CPs$.\\
~~~~(3) Generate combinatorial clusters by probabilistically turning off edges in $\mathbf{G}$.\\
~~~~(4) Select several combinatorial clusters and re-assign labels to them.\\
~~~~(5) Accept the new solution $S_B$ according to the acceptance rate defined in Equation~(\ref{eq:acceptprob}).\\
~~~~(6) Update the generative models, $\phi(\mathbf{I}_{k,i}; W_k, \Theta_k)$, for the categories that have been modified according to solution $S_B$.\\
~~~~(7) Update the posterior probability $( S | \mathcal{D} )$ accordingly.\\
3. Output the final solution $S^* = \arg\max p( S | \mathcal{D} )$.
\end{algorithm}
\section{Category Model Learning}
\label{sec:modellearning}
Given a fixed graph partition $\Pi$, we learn the probability model $\phi_k(W_k, \Theta_k)$ for each category by selecting the most informative visual words. Since all scene images in $\mathcal{D}$ are unlabeled, and no extra negative samples are provided, we employ an efficient generative learning algorithm for this task, namely information pursuit~\cite{inducingfeatures,Zhu:HIT}. Similar approaches of combining generative learning in unsupervised categorization are discussed in \cite{DaiCVPR10}.
Suppose the category $\pi_k$ is governed by an underlying target model $\phi_{f,k}$, the model pursuit can be solved by additively searching for a sequence of features, starting from an initial model $\phi_{k,0}$. At each step $t$, the model $\phi_{k,t}$ is updated to gradually approach $\phi_{f,k}$. Here that we ignore $k$ for notation simplicity. In the manner of stepwise pursuit, the new model $\phi_t$ is updated by adding a new feature $\omega_t$ based on the current model $\phi_{t-1}$, and $\omega_t$ imposes an additive constraint, as,
\begin{eqnarray}
\phi_t = \frac{1}{z_t} \phi_{t-1} e^{\lambda_t r_t},\\\nonumber
s.t. ~~
E_{\phi_{t}} [ r_t ] = E_{\phi_f} [ r_t ],
\end{eqnarray}
where $r_t$ denotes the response of the word $\omega_t$. $E_{\phi_f}(r_t)$ represents the expectation of feature $\omega_t$ over the underlying model, which can be calculated by averaging feature responses over positive samples. $E_{\phi_{t}} [ r_t ]$ denotes the feature expectation on the new model. Follow~\cite{inducingfeatures,Zhu:HIT}, we can derive the probability model by $T$ rounds of model pursuit as the following Gibbs form,
\begin{equation}\label{eq:ori_model}
\phi(\mathbf{I} ; W, \Theta)=\phi_0 (\mathbf{I}) \frac{1}{Z}\exp\bigg\{\sum_{t=1}^{T}\lambda_t r_t (\mathbf{I}) \bigg\},
\end{equation}
where $Z = \prod z_t$ and $\Theta=(\lambda_1,\dots,\lambda_T)$. $z_t$ normalizes the sum of the probability to $1$, and $\lambda_t$ is the coefficient weight of the selected feature $\omega_t$. In our implementation, we specify the initial model $\phi_0$ as a uniform distribution over all words.
With this definition in Equation~(\ref{eq:ori_model}), the model is updated by solving $\lambda_t$ and $r_t$ at each round $t$. Here we discuss a MaxMin-KL algorithm for this goal, which iteratively performs with two following steps.
{\bf Step 1: Max-KL.} The most informative feature $r_t^*$ is selected to update the current model. This step optimizes the following problem, given the candidate features,
\begin{eqnarray}\label{eq:MaxKL}
r_t^* & = & \arg\max_{r_t} \mathcal{K}( \phi_t \| \phi_{t-1} ) \\\nonumber
& = & \arg\max_{r_t} \lambda_t E_{\phi_f} [ r_t ] - \log z_t.
\end{eqnarray}
This step could be computational expensive as we need to sample the model distribution $\phi_{t-1}$ of the previous round $t-1$. Following recent works on image template learning~\cite{Zhu:HIT,LinPatch}, we can simplify the computation by enforcing the visual words have little overlap. In particular, all features can be selected independently. The optimization in Equation~(\ref{eq:MaxKL}) can be approximated as,
\begin{equation}
r_t^* = \arg\max_{r_t} E_{\phi_f} [ r_t ] - E_{\phi_0} [ r_t ],
\end{equation}
where $E_{\phi_0} [ r_t ]$ can be ignored, as it is a constant calculated on the initial model $\phi_0$. We calculate $E_{\phi_f} [ r_t ]$ by the mean response values,
\begin{equation}
E_{\phi_f} [ r_t ] = \frac{1}{n_k} \sum_{i=1}^{n_k} r_t(\mathbf{I}_i),
\end{equation}
where $n_k$ is the number of images belonging into the $k$-th category.
{\bf Step 2: Min-KL.} Given the selected feature $r_t$, this step is to compute its corresponding weight $\lambda_t$ and normalization term $z_t$ by
\begin{eqnarray}\label{eq:MinKL}
\lambda_t^* = \arg\min_{\lambda_t} \mathcal{K}( \phi_t \| \phi_{t-1} ) \\\nonumber
s.t. ~~
E_{\phi_{t}} [ r_t ] = E_{\phi_f} [ r_t ].
\end{eqnarray}
This optimization in Equation~(\ref{eq:MinKL}) can be solved analytically according to the proof in \cite{LinPatch}, and we conduct that,
\begin{eqnarray}
\lambda_t &=& \log \frac{ E_{\phi_f} [ r_t ] (1 - E_{\phi_0} [ r_t ])}{ (1 - E_{\phi_f} [ r_t ] )E_{\phi_0} [ r_t ]} \\\nonumber
z_t &=& \exp{\lambda_t} E_{\phi_0} [ r_t ] + 1 - E_{\phi_0} [ r_t ].
\end{eqnarray}
Since we can analytically pursue this model by selecting a number $T$ of informative features, the model in Equation (\ref{eq:ori_model}) can be further simplified into the following form,
\begin{equation}\label{eq:promodel}
\phi (\mathbf{I};\Theta)=\phi_0 (\mathbf{I}) \prod_t^T \bigg[ \frac{1}{z_t} \exp\{ \lambda_t r_t (\mathbf{I}) \} \bigg].
\end{equation}
The proposed algorithm in the above is simple and fast, because the value of $E_{\phi_f} [r_t]$ and $E_{\phi_0} [ r_t ]$ for each feature only need to be computed once in the off-line stage. Hence, we can embed the learning algorithm to keep the category model updated during the iterating procedure of categorization.
Algorithm.\ref{alg:shotcate} summarizes the overall sketch of our framework.
\section{Experiments}
\label{sec:experiments}
In the experiments, we apply our method to discover categories for a batch of unlabeled images with diverse appearances, and compare with other state-of-the-art approaches.
\begin{figure*}[htbp]
\includegraphics[width=7.0 in]{featselect.pdf}
\caption{The selected visual words for $15$ categories of the UIUC-Scene database. For each category, we show the top $40$ informative visual words according to their information gains (the vertical axis). The different colors represent different types of words (i.e., red for ITWs and blue for HTWs).}
\label{fig:ftrselct}
\end{figure*}
\subsection{Datasets and Metrics}
We use three challenging public databases for validation: MIT-Scene\footnote{http://people.csail.mit.edu/torralba/code/spatialenvelope/}, Corel\footnote{http://wang.ist.psu.edu/docs/related.shtml}, and UIUC-Scene\footnote{http://www-cvr.ai.uiuc.edu/ponce\_grp/data/index.html}. Moverover, these three databases are mixed together as a larger testing set for further evaluation.
The MIT-Scene database contains $2688$ images classified into $8$ categories according to their meaningful semantics: coasts, forest, mountains, country, highways, city views, buildings, and streets. The number of images in each category is in the range of $260 \sim 410$, and the resolution of each image is $256 \times 256$ pixels. The Corel dataset includes $1000$ natural scenes with the resolution $256 \times 384$ pixels of 10 semantic categories: bus, coasts, dinosaurs, elephants, flower, food, horses, mountains, people, and temples. Each category contains $100$ images. The UIUC-scene database, which is an extension of MIT-Scene, contains $4485$ images classified into $15$ categories, and their themes are various, e.g., mountains, forest, offices, and living rooms. The mixed dataset is the union of all the three databases, including totally $5485$ images of $23$ categories. Note that there are a few overlapping categories among them.
\begin{table}[h]
\caption{The inferred cluster number in each time of experiment.}
\centering
\begin{tabular}{lcccccccccc}
\toprule
\# & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5 & 6 & 7 & 8 & 9 & 10 \\
\hline
I & 8 & 9 & 8 & 8 & 9 & 10 & 10 & 11 & 8 & 9 \\
\hline
II & 9 & 10 & 10 & 11 & 10 & 9 & 12 & 11 & 12 & 10 \\
\hline
III & 16 & 17 & 15 & 16 & 16 & 15 & 18 & 16 & 15 & 17 \\
\hline
IV & 27 & 24 & 24 & 26 & 24 & 25 & 24 & 26 & 25 & 25\\
\bottomrule
\multicolumn{11}{l}{\#: No. of experiments;}\\
\multicolumn{11}{l}{I: Experiments on the MIT database;}\\
\multicolumn{11}{l}{II: Experiments on the Corel database;}\\
\multicolumn{11}{l}{III: Experiments on the UIUC database;}\\
\multicolumn{11}{l}{IV: Experiments on the mixed dataset.}
\end{tabular}
\label{tab:clusternum}
\end{table}
\begin{table*}[bp]
\caption{Performance comparison via Purity (higher is better)}
\centering
\begin{tabular}{cccccccccc}
\toprule
& \multirow{2}*{\small K-means} & \multirow{2}*{\small GIST} & \multirow{2}*{pLSA} & \multirow{2}*{LDA} & \multirow{2}*{AP} & \multicolumn{3}{c}{Ours} \\
\cmidrule{7-9}
& & & & & & ITW+HTW & ITW & HTW\\
\midrule
MIT & 0.5529 & 0.5770 & 0.6457 & 0.6096 & 0.5546 & \textbf{0.6721} &0.5764 & 0.6000 \\
\midrule
Corel & 0.5337 & 0.5644 & 0.6070 & 0.5980 & 0.5612 & \textbf{0.6203} & 0.6160 & 0.6040\\
\midrule
UIUC & 0.4487 & 0.4514 & 0.5074 & 0.5449 & 0.5850 & \textbf{0.5964} & 0.5613 & 0.5148\\
\midrule
Mixed & 0.3632 & 0.3801 & 0.4136 & 0.4801 & 0.5017 & \textbf{0.5295} & 0.4836 & 0.4226\\
\bottomrule
\end{tabular}
\label{tab:Purity}
\end{table*}
\begin{table*}[bp]
\caption{Performance comparison via Conditional Entropy (lower is better)}
\centering
\begin{tabular}{ccccccccc}
\toprule
& \multirow{2}*{\small K-means} & \multirow{2}*{\small GIST} & \multirow{2}*{pLSA} & \multirow{2}*{LDA} & \multirow{2}*{AP} & \multicolumn{3}{c}{Ours} \\
\cmidrule{7-9}
& & & & & & ITW+HTW & ITW & HTW\\
\midrule
MIT & 1.2465 & 1.2102& 1.0156 & 1.1836 & 1.1400 & \textbf{0.8963} & 1.1536& 1.1145 \\
\midrule
Corel & 1.3105 & 1.2136 & 1.1234 & 1.1371 & 1.2577 &\textbf{1.0909} & 1.1036 & 1.1154\\
\midrule
UIUC &1.5020 & 1.4564 & 1.4322 & 1.3146 & 1.2121 &\textbf{1.1581} & 1.2150 & 1.3948\\
\midrule
Mixed & 1.7603 & 1.7172 & 1.6811 & 1.5828 & 1.5127 &\textbf{1.4328} & 1.4971 & 1.5955\\
\bottomrule
\end{tabular}
\label{tab:CondEnt}
\end{table*}
The usual evaluation metric for categorization is Average Precision, and the number of categories is assumed to be predetermined. In this work, we adopt the two recently proposed metrics for unsupervised categorization~\cite{Tuytelaars:IJCV09,DuanVideo}, i.e., {\em Purity} and {\em Conditional Entropy}. In brief, the larger value of \textit{Purity} implies the better performance in categorization and \textit{Conditional Entropy} inversely.
For the input set $\mathcal{D}$, including a number of $N$ images, suppose the underlying category number is $L$ and the corresponding groundtruth category labels are denoted by $X=\{x_i\in [1, L], i=1,\dots,N\}$. A testing system groups the images into $K$ categories, $\{D_k, k=1, \dots, K\}$, with the inferred category labels $Y=\{y_i\in [1, K], i=1, \dots, N\}$. It is worth mentioning that $K$ could be not equal to $L$, as we allow the algorithm to automatically determine the number of categories. The metric \textit{Purity} and \textit{Conditional Entropy} are defined as,
\begin{eqnarray}
Purity(X|Y)=\sum_{y\in Y}p(y)\max_{x\in X}p(x|y),\\
H(X|Y)=\sum_{y\in Y}p(y)\sum_{x\in X}p(x|y)\log{\frac{1}{p(x|y)}},
\end{eqnarray}
where $p(y)=\frac{|D_y|}{N}$ and $p(x|y)$ can be simply estimated from the observed frequencies in categorized data, resulting in an empirical estimation. $|D_y|$ represents the number of images in one category.
\subsection{Parameter settings and results}
We carry out the experiments on a PC with Quad-Core 3.6GHz CPU and 32GB memory. We set the parameter $\beta = 300$ in the probabilistic formulation (in Equation~(\ref{eq:postp})), and the parameter $\tau=0.2$ in the probabilistic edge definition (in Equation~(\ref{eq:edgeprob})).
In our experiments, we first randomly collect a number of image patches with different scales from the datasets and generate $500$ ITWs and $500$ HTWs as introduced in Section~\ref{sec:imagerepresentation}. There are totally $1000$ words in the dictionary.
We carry out our method $10$ times and use the average performance for comparison. The inferred category number may not be identical each time, as reported in Table.\ref{tab:clusternum}. The average category number is $9.0$ for the MIT-Scene, $10.4$ for the Corel, $16.1$ for UIUC-Scene, and $25.0$ for the mixed dataset.
\begin{figure*}[!htbp]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=6.8 in]{convcomp2.pdf}
\caption{Convergence comparisons of the CSWC algorithm and the original version. The experiments are executed on the three databases: MIT-Scene in (a), Corel in (b), and UIUC-Scene in (c). In each chart, the horizontal axis and the vertical axis, respectively, represent the iterating step and the target energy ($-\log p(S|\mathcal{D})$). The dashed (green) curves are from the original SWC algorithm and the solid (blue) curves are from the CSWC algorithm, respectively.}
\label{fig:convcomp}
\end{figure*}
\begin{figure*}[!htbp]
\centering
\includegraphics[scale=0.45]{complexity_anal.pdf}
\caption{Time complexity analysis with the increase of data scale. This analysis is performed on the mixture of MIT database and Corel database. In each figure
the vertical axis represents the speed (iteration step) of convergence; the horizontal axis in (a) represents the number of images with fixed $16$ underlying categories, in (b) the number of categories with the fixed number of images, and in (c) the number of images with various underlying categories.}
\label{fig:complexity}
\end{figure*}
For comparison, several state-of-the-art approaches are implemented based on the codes released by the original researchers, including pLSA \cite{Bosch06}, Affinity Propagation (AP)~\cite{frey07affinitypropagation} and LDA~\cite{LDA}. For the pLSA approach, we extract color SIFT descriptors to construct a dictionary of $1000$ visual words following their original implementation. For the other two approaches, i.e., AP and LDA, we use our image representations (i.e., two types of words extracted within the spatial pyramid) as the inputs of the clustering algorithms. In addition, the $k$-means clustering algorithm is adopted as the baseline, with either our representations or the gradient-based GIST features~\cite{GIST}. These methods use exactly the same experiment settings as our approach for fair evaluation, but the category number for them is manually fixed, i.e., $8$ for the MIT-Scene database, $10$ for the Corel, $15$ for the UIUC-Scene, and $23$ for the mixed dataset. The quantitative performances are reported in Table~\ref{tab:Purity} and Table \ref{tab:CondEnt} based on the two benchmark metrics, respectively. In general, our method outperforms other comparing approaches. We also evaluate our method with only one type of visual words, i.e., either ITW or HTW, so that the benefits of combining two types of features are clearly illustrated.
In our method, the clustering inference is performed simultaneously with the feature selection for category modeling. In Fig.\ref{fig:ftrselct}, we show the selected visual words of different types, i.e., ITWs and HTWs, for different categories, and the coefficients of top $40$ informative words are plotted as well. The results are very reasonable that the selected words match with the appearances of the images very well.
\subsection{Analysis}
In the following, we conduct additional empirical analysis to validate the advantages of our approach.
First, we analyze the convergence efficiency of the CSWC algorithm and compare with the original version. Fig.\ref{fig:convcomp} shows the convergence curves of the target energy, i.e., $ -\log{P(S|\mathcal{D})} $, with the increasing iteration steps. Note that the energy goes inversely with the posterior probability. We can observe that the CSWC algorithm converges significantly faster on all the three databases.
Moreover, we analyze the computational complexity of our approach. The space complexity (i.e., computer memory) is basically related with the size of the visual word dictionary and the number of images to be categorized. Here we mainly discuss the time complexity that quantifies the amount of time taken by an algorithm conditional on the asymptotic size of the input. Using the big $\mathcal{O}$ notation, which excludes coefficients and lower order terms, the theoretic time complexity of our approach is $\mathcal{O} (MKT)$, where $M$ is the number of sampling steps, $K$ is the category number, and $T$ is the average number of features selected for each category. As we discussed in Section~\ref{sec:modellearning}, the generative model can be pursued analytically by greedy feature selection, and the feature responses on all images can be calculated off-line. In addition, only a few (i.e., $< K $) categories need to be updated in each iteration. Hence, we roughly consider the time complexity determined by the sampling steps. On the mentioned hardware, each iteration costs averagely 0.043s (MIT-Scene), 0.015s (Corel), and 0.052s (UIUC-Scene), respectively, on the three databases. In Fig.~\ref{fig:complexity}, we visualize the numbers of iteration steps on two types of data scales: the total number of images to be categorized and the underlying category number. From the results, we can observe that the steps increase in the nonexponential order, which is accordant with our analysis.
At last, in order to reveal how much the vocabulary size affects the results, we present an experiment in Fig.\ref{fig:VocSize}, where the categorization results are reported with different sizes of vocabulary on the mixed dataset. The conclusion can be drawn that our approach is not sensitive on the vocabulary size, as we incorporate the model learning (i.e., feature selection) with the categorization. And this property enables us to avoid elaborately tuning the size of vocabulary in practice.
\begin{figure}[!htbp]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=3.0 in]{VoSize2.pdf}
\caption{The influence of vocabulary size. This analysis is executed on the mixed database (of $23$ categories). The upper figure and the lower figure, respectively, represent the results via {\em Purity} and {\em Conditional Entropy}. The horizontal axis represents the vocabulary size. Note that we generate equal size for the two types of words in the testings.}
\label{fig:VocSize}
\end{figure}
\section{Conclusions}
\label{sec:conclusion}
This paper studies a general framework for automatically discovering image categories via unsupervised graph partition. Compared with the previous methods, the advantage of the proposed method is identified on several public datasets and summarized as follows. First, images are represented by two types of visual words, ITWs and HTWs, which capture image appearances from different aspects. Second, we perform feature selection simultaneously with the clustering procedure, guided by a generative model for each category. Third, we employ a stochastic sampling algorithm for efficient inference, in which the clustering number is automatically determined.
|
\section*{Abstract}
\textit{In general when considering cache coherence, write back schemes are the default. These schemes invalidate all other copies of a data block during a write. In this paper we propose several hybrid schemes that will switch between updating and invalidating on processor writes at runtime, depending on program conditions. We created our own cache simulator on which we could implement our schemes, and generated data sets from both commercial benchmarks and through artificial methods to run on the simulator. We analyze the results of running the benchmarks with various schemes, and suggest further research that can be done in this area.}
\begin{multicols}{2}
\section{Introduction}
\noindent When the first microprocessor was released, its memory operations were relatively short when compared to their corresponding arithmetic operations. Since then, microprocessors have been trending strongly in the other directions, with today's load and store operations being several orders of magnitude slower than arithmetic operations. This so called 'memory wall' has only been exacerbated by the coming of microprocessors. The added complexity of trying to synchronize memory operations and, more importantly, cache contents between cores can tremendously slow down performance if not executed intelligently. In this paper, we will discuss variations of the standard MOESI cache coherence scheme that allow a cache to either update or invalidate during a write request, depending on the situation.\\
\subsection{Background}
\noindent The most common and widely used state-based coherence scheme in multi-core machines is the MOESI scheme. It consists of the following five states:\\
\noindent \textit{(M)odified} --- The cache block is the sole owner of 'dirty' data.\\
\noindent \textit{(O)wned} ---- The cache block owns the 'dirty' data, but there are other sharers. A cache with a block in the O state processes requests for that block from other cores.\\
\noindent \textit{(E)xclusive} ---- The cache is the sole owner of clean data.\\
\noindent (\textit{S)hared} ---- The cache is one of several possessors of a block, but it is not the owner and its data is clean.\\
\noindent \textit{(I)nvalid} ---- The cache block does not hold valid data\\
\noindent In general, most machines will use an Invalidate protocol with NMOESI. That is, when two caches contain blocks with the same tag, a write to one cache causes an invalidation signal to be sent to the other cache. A cache will send out this invalidate signal unless it knows it is the sole owner of the data, such as in the M or E state. In the case of the O, S or I state, the cache will generate and invalidate signal that will tell all other caches to set their copies of the data to I.\\
\noindent Invalidate schemes can be thought of a reactive approach to cache coherence. A cache will only receive modified data from another cache if it asks for it. For a more proactive approach, one would look to an update scheme. \\
\noindent An update signal is sent with data in the same scenarios where an invalidate scheme would send an invalidate signal, but rather than set their blocks to I, these cores would replace their old data with the block's new value and set it to the S state.
Both schemes have their advantages and disadvantages. It's good to be proactive and use and update scheme if you know that a block written to by one core will soon be read by another core, but updates can also generate a lot of unnecessary bus traffic. \\
\noindent Meanwhile, invalidate schemes will avoid this bus traffic up front, but may still generate it later if they need to read a block that has been invalidated. Like most things, \textit{it is possible that a good answer lies somewhere in between}. Below, we propose hybrid schemes that switch between invalidating and updating depending on the cores' recent behavior.\\
\subsection{Previous Research}
\noindent A fair amount of research was done on the advantages and disadvantages of updating or invalidating in the mid-80s. Since then, most research has gone towards other aspects of coherence, but many of these papers present a reasonable starting place.\\
\noindent A method called the RB protocol was proposed by Rudolf and Segall \cite{PS84} for write-through caches. The scheme updates all other cores on the write-through by default, but if two writes occurred back to back, data in all other cores would be invalidated. This likely saved traffic for write-through machines, but as most machines today have write-back caches, updating on every write would create an excessive amount of extra bus traffic.\\
\noindent Karlin, Manasse, Rudolf and Sleator \cite{KM86} would later propose a scheme called 'Competitive Snooping' which would rely on amortized analysis to allow updates to occur so long as there was enough allotted cost for them to occur. This cost was related to the amount of time it would have taken if invalidation had occurred instead, but that invalidation eventually resulted in cache misses. While interesting, this scheme would likely also struggle on write-back machines. As we will show later, it is much better to invalidate by default and update when necessary.\\
\noindent While both above methods relied mainly on the patterns of their own cores, Archibald \cite{AJ88} proposed a scheme that would take into account the actions of other cores. Once again, it updated by default, but if any core had three writes to a single location without any other core accessing that location, invalidation would occur instead. We also see a potential profit of hybrid schemes in various fields such as large-scale systems with shared memory \cite{SM11}\cite{HB11}, memory-optimized protocols \cite{LM06}, and others.
\noindent Our proposed schemes all begin by invalidating first, then allowing updates when certain criteria have been met. They also heavily take into account the actions of other cores on the network.\\
\section{Proposed Schemes}
\noindent For our research, we decided to implement and compare several different schemes for performance:\\
\subsection{Invalidate-Only Scheme}
\noindent This is the basic scheme that is used by many multicore systems. When a cache writes to a block in the O, S or I state, it sends an invalidate signal to the network. All other cores that receive this signal invalidate their copies of the block.\\
\subsection{Update-Only Scheme}
\noindent The opposite of the Invalidate-Only Scheme, caches writing to a block in the O, S or I state send an update signal with data to the network. All other cores that receive this signal update their copies with the correct value and set themselves to S.\\
\subsection{Threshold Scheme}
\noindent This is the first of our proposed hybrid schemes that we implemented ourselves. In this scheme, each cache block carries with it an associated counter that is used to determine whether updates or invalidates should occur upon a write. It is defined by the following three scenarios:\\
\begin{enumerate}
\item Upon entry to the cache from main memory, counter is initialized to zero.
\item Whenever a read request is seen by a cache and it contains a valid block with matching address, that block's counter is increased by one.
\item After a block is successfully written to, its value decreases by one.
\end{enumerate}
\noindent When we write to a block, we check the counter value against the threshold. If the counter is above or equal to the threshold, we send an update signal to the network. Otherwise, we send an invalidate signal. The logic behind this scheme is two-fold. When we sense multiple reads to a block, we increase the counter and aim to update rather than invalidate. When we sense more writes, we have a lower counter and invalidate other blocks instead.\\
\subsection{Adapted-MOESI}
\noindent This scheme is the same as the Invalidate-Only scheme except that when writing to a block that is in the O state, we send an update signal to the network rather than an invalidate signal. Invalidation still occurs when writing to a block in the S or I state. As we will discuss later, the Threshold Scheme works best with a threshold of one. When a block's counter is set to one, its state is almost always zero, so this scheme attempts to approximate the effects of the threshold scheme without the extra hardware.\\
\subsection{Number of Sharers Scheme}
\noindent Our final scheme is an alternate version of the threshold scheme. Rather than keep track of read and write requests to a memory location, whether or not to do an update is determined by the number of sharers any given data block has. If the number is above or equal to a certain number of sharers, an update will occur in place of an invalidate. This is particularly relevant due to its ease of implementation in directory schemes, whose popularity is on the rise in highly parallel machines.\\
\section{Simulation}
\subsection{Creating the Simulator}
\noindent In order to simulate each of these different schemes, our team developed a simple cache simulating program in C++. The program takes as input a list of loads and stores, with each string in the list containing a load/store identifier, a core number, and an address. When run with one of these inputs, the program simulates the operation of anywhere from 1 to 16 separate caches under the standard MOESI protocol. During the run, it keeps track of the number of reads, writes, read request, write requests (invalidates) and update requests at each core. Since our program simulates the scheme functionality independent of timing, we are looking at the total number of read requests, write requests and update requests as our metric for performance. The total number of requests is proportional to the amount of traffic that would exist on the network and therefore is an acceptable means of judging performance.
We chose to develop our own simulator mainly for speed of simulation and ease of programming. Doing so gave us the freedom to keep track of whatever metrics we liked, while also being able to easily add in various different versions of the coherence scheme. Other simulators like multi2sim, which is discussed in the next section, proved to be incredibly difficult to make changes to and were significantly slower due to all of the additional work that goes into the full timing simulation. Ultimately, it was decided that timing simulation was less important than the functional simulation, since timing varies so greatly from machine to machine.\\
\subsection{Simulation Statistics}
\noindent Our simulator can simulate anywhere from 2 to 16 caches at once. The simulator only uses one level of caches. Beyond the first level, all caches are connected to main memory. Each cache contains 64 sets with 4 blocks in each set. Each dataset that we generated to run on the simulator contains roughly five million loads/stores, so the metric used in this paper will be the total number of read requests, invalidates and updates on all cores per five million instructions.\\
\section{Generating Datasets}
\noindent In order to run our simulator, we needed to generate files containing list of loads and stores to the various cores. We chose to look at a diverse array of datasets in order to gain the best possible understanding of our various schemes. Also, we made sure that generated datasets are reasonably representative of their benchmark.\\
\noindent Each of these benchmarks was run on 2, 4, 8 and 16 cores. Each scenario was simulated \textit{using Invalidate-Only, Update-Only, Threshold, Adapted-MOESI and Number of Sharers} schemes.\\
\subsection{Commercial Workloads}
\noindent We certainly wanted to include datasets corresponding to commercial benchmarks. To do this, we took advantage of the multi2sim timing simulator \cite{MU14}. While it was very difficult to implement the new hybrid schemes in the multi2sim timing simulator, we found that it was easy to adapt the simulator to generate datasets. While running a timing simulation, we had the simulator output to a file the information for five million consecutive loads and stores. We usually waited several tens of millions of instructions for the parallel programs to get warmed up before starting the output. This way, we were able to generate a more representative sample of the benchmark's performance. We generated datasets from the following four benchmarks in this way.\\
\noindent \textit{Bodytrack} --- Computer vision algorithm\\
\noindent \textit{Dedup} --- Compression of a data stream through local and global means\\
\noindent \textit{Streamcluster} --- Solves online clustering problem\\
\noindent \textit{Swaptions} --- uses Monte Carlo techniques to price a portfolio of swaptions\\
\subsection{Artificial Workloads}
\noindent Finally, we created a handful of pseudo-random datasets meant to represent common multicore scenarios, such as many cores sharing a lock, many cores updating an array based on an element's neighbors, and a server model. These datasets were generated with simple C++ programs.\\
\noindent Our \textit{Locks} dataset established 3 shared locks between any number of cores. Each core had a 10\% chance of accessing the lock. When doing so, the core would write to the lock to free it if it possessed it. If it did not possess the lock, it would read from the lock and then write to take the lock if no one else possessed it. Only blocks containing the locks were shared between cores. All other data accesses were restricted to their own private range of addresses.\\
\noindent Our \textit{Arrays} dataset represents an array that is constantly updated by comparing elements. In this scenario, an array element is read by one core, as are its neighbors above, below to the right and to the left of it. Each core traversed through a row in this array, and during each cycle, a core would be randomly chosen to process the next element in its row. Note that in a real program, this would result in non-deterministic behavior.\\
\noindent Our \textit{Pseudo-Server} dataset represents a very basic server-client model with public and private data where one core is allowed to write to shared data and each other core may only read from it. The server core can write to any block in the whole address range. The address range itself is split into two sections. The first section is public and can be read by any client core. The second section represents private space and is divided between all of the client cores which are only allowed to read from their own space.\\
\section{Results and Analysis}
\noindent Below we present results and analysis for each scheme using the various benchmarks. Note that all graphs only display the total sum of all bus transactions for each scenario. Detailed breakdown of how those transactions are split between read requests, invalidates and updates is provided in the appendix.\\
\subsection{Invalidate/Update Only Scheme}
\noindent First, we will simply look at the base \textit{Invalidate-Only} and \textit{Update-Only} schemes. To limit the amount of data presented in this section, only graphs for 8-core scenarios are presented, although results from scenarios with other numbers of cores will be discussed. Additionally, as mentioned above, the numbers presented are bus transactions per five million memory instructions. Results for the commercial and artificial workloads are shown below (\textbf{Figure 1}).\\
\noindent The primary point gained from this data is that, for many applications, there is a large gap between the number of transactions that occur with an update-only scheme and an invalidate-only scheme. In many workloads, the amount of data that is heavily shared between cores is much less than the amount of data that is primarily used by one core but is occasionally accessed by others. In an update-only scheme, we are updating any core that has ever accessed the shared data, when we ideally only want to update those cores that have accessed it recently.
The one exception to this pattern is the \textit{bodytrack} benchmark. The difference between the two schemes is relatively small, indicating denser sharing between the caches. As we will see later, this makes this benchmark a good candidate to improve performance under a hybrid scheme (\textbf{Figure 2}).\\
\noindent Our artificially generated benchmarks present much less variation between the two extremes. The pseudo-server benchmark, due to its unique structure, actually performs better under the update-only scheme.\\
\noindent Another interesting note to take away is that the \textit{arrays} benchmark maintains a consistent number of transactions regardless of scheme, even though the distribution of updates/invalidates is different. Due to the 'enforced' order of the memory transactions (they happen in order on each core, although the core that may proceed in each iteration is chosen randomly), the benchmark never really benefits from any updates.\\
\subsection{Threshold and Adapted-MOESI Schemes}
\noindent In this section, we will analyze the results from running the benchmarks with the \textit{Threshold} scheme at several different thresholds, as well as under the \textit{Adapted-MOESI scheme} (\textbf{Figure 3}). \\
\begin{figure*}[!htb]
\minipage{0.32\textwidth}
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{graph1.png}
\caption{A really Awesome Image}\label{fig:awesome_image1}
\endminipage\hfill
\minipage{0.32\textwidth}
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{graph2.png}
\caption{A really Awesome Image}\label{fig:awesome_image2}
\endminipage\hfill
\minipage{0.32\textwidth}%
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{graph3.png}
\caption{A really Awesome Image}\label{fig:awesome_image3}
\endminipage
\end{figure*}
\noindent For the most part, there is a much smaller gap between the number of transactions that occur with the \textit{Invalidate-Only} scheme and the hybrid scheme. Still, for those benchmarks that originally had a large gap, the \textit{Invalidate-Only} scheme outperforms any hybrid scheme. For \textit{bodytrack}, however, the hybrid schemes of \textit{Threshold 1} and \textit{Adapted-MOESI} actually outperform the other schemes. Since the benchmark was relatively dense, and because the update and invalidate schemes both performed relatively well, having a smart way to choose whether to update or invalidate ends up improving performance.\\
\noindent When it came to the value to set the \textit{Threshold} to, only a value of one really showed any difference from an Invalidate-Only scheme. The \textit{Threshold} of 3 was in most cases identical to running \textit{with Invalidate-Only}. \\
\noindent Due to this result, we believed that it may be worthwhile to implement a scheme that updates when the state of the block being written to was (O)wned. This logic stemmed from the observation that when the threshold of one was met, the block was most commonly in the O state. In practice, however, this performed not better that a \textit{Threshold} of one, but at times would perform significantly worse. While blocks with a counter value that met the threshold of one were often in the O state, not all blocks in the O state would necessarily have a threshold value of one (\textbf{Figure 4}).\\
\noindent It is somewhat difficult to tell because of the scale of the graph, but the \textit{locks} benchmark performed slightly worse with the \textit{Threshold } scheme than it did with the \textit{Invalidate-Only} scheme, while the server benchmark did slightly better. The arrays benchmark still did not see any change.\\
\noindent The server benchmark is interesting because it was the only one to do better under the \textit{Update-Only} scheme. In this case, the \textit{Threshold } and \textit{Adapted-MOESI} schemes did better than always invalidating, but worse than always updating. While these hybrid schemes will not necessarily be the best possible scheme for each benchmark, they may provide a decent compromise between schemes that perform best always invalidating and those that perform best always updating.\\
\begin{figure*}[!htb]
\minipage{0.32\textwidth}
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{graph4.png}
\caption{A really Awesome Image}\label{fig:awesome_image1}
\endminipage\hfill
\minipage{0.32\textwidth}
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{graph5.png}
\caption{A really Awesome Image}\label{fig:awesome_image2}
\endminipage\hfill
\minipage{0.32\textwidth}%
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{graph6.png}
\caption{A really Awesome Image}\label{fig:awesome_image3}
\endminipage
\end{figure*}
\subsection{Number of Sharers Scheme}
\noindent Finally, we will address the results gained from running each benchmark under the \textit{Number of Sharers} scheme (\textbf{Figure 5}).\\
\noindent The \textit{Number of Sharers} scheme actually performs relatively well in most cases. Like the \textit{Threshold} scheme, it performs better on the \textit{bodytrack} benchmark than either always updating or always invalidating. Interestingly, the \textit{swaptions} benchmark also sees improvement. Unlike the \textit{Threshold} scheme, this scheme has the benefit of always knowing exactly how many other caches share data with a cache that is being written to, and this seems to be reflected as an increase in performance on some benchmarks.\\
\noindent On other benchmarks, specifically \textit{streamcluster}, this scheme seems to perform worse. Because of how the updating works, the only way for a core not to become a sharer again is to be evicted from the cache, since it will never be invalidated once updates start happening. If a core doesn't access a block regularly but also doesn't evict it often enough, the scheme may update when it doesn't need to. This effect is reflected in the poor performance of the \textit{streamcluster} benchmark (\textbf{Figure 6}). \\
\noindent Finally, the results for the \textit{Number of Sharers} scheme on the artificial benchmarks look very similar to the \textit{Threshold scheme}, except the results are more exaggerated. It does worse on the \textit{locks} benchmark but better on the \textit{server} benchmark. Because of the factors discussed above, this scheme seems to be more of a win-more/lose-more scheme than the \textit{Threshold} scheme. If a benchmark benefitted from the \textit{Threshold} scheme relative to the \textit{Invalidate-Only} scheme, it benefits more with the Number of Sharers scheme. If it did worse with \textit{Threshold}, it does even worse with Number of Sharers.\\
\noindent The minimum number of sharers required for updates to occur seemed to be best set around half of the number of cores. If it was too little, such as two sharers in the case of eight cores, then too many updates occurred. When the required number of sharers got above half, the performance usually stagnated at a constant value, since anything that is shared between half of the cores is generally shared between almost all of them.\\
\section{Final Points}
\noindent In this final section of the paper, we will discuss what conclusions can be drawn from the above analyzed data, what additional considerations need to be taken into account when judging the results, and suggest further research that can be done in this area.\\
\subsection{Conclusions}
\noindent There certainly exist examples of benchmarks that perform better with either an \textit{Invalidate-Only} scheme or an \textit{Update-Only} scheme. In some instances, such as the bodytrack benchmark, there exist hybrids that perform better than either \textit{Invalidate-Only} or \textit{Update-Only}. In other instances, there are hybrid schemes that will perform better than one of \textit{Invalidate-Only} or \textit{Update-Only} but worse than the other. \\
\noindent When considering different threshold values for the \textit{Threshold } scheme, a value of 1 provided the most dramatic result. High threshold values functioned almost identically to \textit{Invalidate-Only} schemes. Employing the \textit{Threshold} scheme with a value of one resulted in the lowest number of transactions on some benchmarks, while providing a reasonable compromise on others.\\
\noindent The Adapted-MOESI scheme did not perform as well as expected, as it led to more bus transactions than the Threshold scheme in every scenario.\\
\noindent Finally, the \textit{Number of Sharers} scheme performed reasonably well, especially when the required number of sharers needed to perform an update was around half the number of cores. However, it varied more from the average than the Threshold scheme did. Because of this, the Threshold scheme seems to be the correct choice for a scheme that will provide the optimal compromise between benchmarks that perform best with more updates and those that perform best with more invalidates.\\
\subsection{Additional Considerations}
\noindent Our simulator did not take timing into account, as we were only concerned with counting the total number of transactions. Since the timing would vary from machine to machine, metrics such as IPC would be less informative than the total number of transactions. In a real machine, the timing of updates and invalidates plays an important role. Updating results in longer stores but potentially much faster loads, while invalidation can do the reverse.\\
\noindent We also did not consider hardware cost when evaluating the various schemes. Updating on its own requires more hardware since more complex transactions must be sent over the bus. The \textit{Threshold} scheme requires substantial extra hardware, since each cache block must contain its own counter. The \textit{Adapted-MOESI} scheme requires virtually no extra hardware. The Number of Sharers requires some sort of centralized index of the number of sharers on all data blocks in all caches. This can be easily accomplished by the directory in any cache coherence protocol that uses one.\\
\subsection{Further Research}
\noindent While the \textit{Adapted-MOESI} scheme was meant to emulate a \textit{Threshold} scheme with a threshold value of one using less hardware, it ultimately failed in that endeavor. Still there is certainly a way to get the same effect with significantly less hardware.\\
\noindent While we chose not to concern ourselves with the timing effects of the various schemes, they would certainly be interesting to address.\\
\noindent Finally, since our simulator used a snoopy protocol combined with \textit{MOESI}, it would be interesting to see how each of these schemes interacts with a directory-based protocol. It would be especially interesting for the \textit{Number of Sharers} scheme, as that scheme would be so easy to implement in a directory-protocol.\\
|
\section{Introduction}
A number of algorithms have recently been developed that
automatically design representations through a process called dictionary learning. The hope is that learning algorithms can exploit structure in specific classes of signals, enabling better performance in applications. Dictionary learning algorithms have already been used successfully in a number of image processing problems, such as image
compression \cite{Aharon05}\cite{Skretting11}, inpainting
\cite{Mairal09}\cite{Zhou09}, image denoising
\cite{Aharon05}\cite{Li12}\cite{Elad06}\cite{Elad08}, super-resolution
\cite{Yang10}\cite{Zhou12}, digit recognition, and texture
classification \cite{Mairal08}.
Popular dictionary learning algorithms can be roughly divided into two
categories: hard constraint-based \cite{Aharon05} \cite{Engan1999-ICASSP}, and soft
sparsity-penalty-based \cite{Mairal09}\cite{Olshausen96}\cite{Lee06}.
These algorithms search for a dictionary of vectors (called atoms)
so that it is possible to represent each sample signal
as a linear combination of a small number of the atoms.
Often dictionaries with more atoms than the dimension, called over-complete
dictionaries, are used.
Since we would like to use only a few atoms in the representation of each sample, a sparsity constraint is imposed on the coefficients in the representations. Both K-SVD \cite{Aharon05} and the online dictionary learning \cite{Mairal09} algorithm impose sparsity constraints, either hard or soft, on the representation of individual samples. However, it may not be optimal to assume a similar sparsity level for each sample. In fact, some samples could be easy to represent and some may require more atoms in their representations. The recent dictionary learning algorithm of \cite{Spielman12} searches for dictionaries that have a sparsity constraint on the number of times each atom is used. Thus, some signals can be represented using more atoms than others. Their algorithm inspires us to focus on how individual atoms are used rather than how individual signals are represented.
In this paper we present a monotone algorithm for dictionary learning. Similar to \cite{Spielman12}, the algorithm we propose in this work also acts on the rows of the coefficient matrix, but can empirically produce good approximations even in the more challenging (and realistic) conditions. In contrast to the traditional sample-based sparsity constraint, we impose the sparsity constraint in a batchwise fashion. That is, we switch the positions of the non-zeros in the coefficients within batches of samples among different columns and rows in the coefficient matrix, and at the same time keep the total number of non-zeros fixed. As a result, the number of non-zeros, constrained within a batch of samples, is allowed to vary in either columns or rows . We show that all the non-zero position switching operations only reduce reconstruction error, leading to a convergent objective function. For initialization, we introduce a simple iterative dictionary update procedure that operates on a batch of samples to give an approximate guess of the dictionary. In each iteration, first the non-zero patterns are derived using a block orthogonal matching pursuit and then the dictionary is updated using least squares.
There are two main advantages of our proposed algorithm:
\begin{enumerate}
\item Since the non-zero positions are optimized in a batchwise fashion, we are able to achieve a smaller reconstruction error, or better approximation, compared to the traditional sample-by-sample constraint with the same level of sparsity.
\item The reconstruction error is guaranteed to decrease monotonically and converge.
\end{enumerate}
\section{Notation}\label{sec:note}
In the dictionary learning problem,
one is given a matrix that contains the sample signals in its columns,
$Y=[y_1,y_2,\dots,y_p]\in \mathbb{R}^{m\times p}$,
along with a target number of atoms, $n$.
The goal is to find a dictionary of atoms $A\in \mathbb{R}^{m\times n}$
and a sparse coefficient matrix $X\in \mathbb{R}^{n\times p}$
so that $Y\approx AX$.
Throughout this paper, $m$ is the dimension of
each sample and $p$ is the number of samples.
We use $a_i$
and $x_i$ to denote the $i$th column of $A$ and $X$ respectively, and
$x^i$ to denote the $i$th row of $X$. We use $\Omega^i$ to denote the
support of $x^i$, $\Omega_i$ for the support of $x_i$,
$k^i=|\Omega^i|$, and $k_i=|\Omega_i|$. $\otimes$ is the Kronecker product, $I_p$ is a $p$-by-$p$ identity matrix, and $y=\mathrm{vec}(Y)$, where $\mathrm{vec}(\cdot)$ concatenates the columns of $Y$ to form a vector.
For a set
$\Omega \subseteq \{1, \dotsc , \} $, we let
$P_\Omega$ to denote the projection matrix
$P_{\Omega} = [e_{\omega_1},e_{\omega_2},\dots,e_{\omega_{|\Omega|}}]$,
where $e_i$ is the elementary unit vector in coordinate $i$.
We use $Y_\Omega$ to denote $YP_\Omega$. $A/a_i$ means the sub-matrix constructed by removing the $i$th column of $A$, and $X/x^i$ is the sub-matrix constructed by removing the $i$th row of $X$. When describing iterative algorithms, we use $x^{(+)}$ to denote the updated value of $x$.
\section{Columnwise Sparsity Constraints}\label{sec:prev}
State-of-the-art dictionary learning algorithms treat the input sample matrix $Y$ in a sample-by-sample way. That is, the sparseness constraint is imposed on the coefficient of each sample independently using the current dictionary, and then the dictionary and coefficient matrix are updated accordingly. Among popular dictionary learning algorithms, two representative ones are the hard-constraint-based $K$-SVD \cite{Aharon05} and the soft-penalty-based dictionary learning algorithms such as the online learning algorithm \cite{Mairal09} and the efficient sparse coding algorithms \cite{Lee06}.
The $K$-SVD algorithm aims to iteratively minimize the objective
\begin{align}
\min_{A,X} \|Y-AX\|_f^2~~\mathrm{s.t.}~~\forall i, \|x_i\|_0\leq k,
\end{align}
where $A$ is the dictionary and $X$ is the sparse coefficient matrix.
Empirically the $K$-SVD algorithms often works well, but its objective value is not guaranteed to decrease monotonically because the support of $X$ is changed using the greedy pursuit algorithm one column at a time.
The algorithms in \cite{Mairal09} \cite{Lee06} replace the hard $\ell_0$ penalty with an $\ell_1$ penalty, giving
\begin{align}
\min_{A,X} \|Y-AX\|_f^2+\lambda\sum_i \|x_i\|_1.
\end{align}
This optimization problem is not convex. However, it is convex in $X$ if $A$ is fixed, or in $A$ if $X$ is fixed. As in the method of optimal directions (MOD), the optimization is done via alternating directions.
The advantage of column-wise sparsity constraints is that it leads naturally to fast online algorithms. Whenever a new sample comes one simply adds a sparsity constraint on the incoming column of $X$. The downside is the sample-by-sample sparsity treatment lacks a ``global'' view of the sparsity pattern. For example, there is no reason we should require each sample to be represented by exactly $k$ atoms in the dictionary, or impose a sparsity penalty with the same $\lambda$. Some samples, being ``harder" to approximate, require more atoms, and it could be a waste to use too many atoms to represent the ``easy'' samples.
\section{Batchwise Support Switching Procedures}\label{sec:suppSwitch}
Unlike $K$-SVD and online learning, which constrain the sparsity of the coefficients in a column-by-column fashion, we argue that it may be possible to obtain better sparse approximations of the input as a whole if we allow the column sparsity to vary.
We seek the best possible reconstruction, subject to a constraint on the {\em total} number of nonzeros across the batch of samples:
\begin{align}
\min_{A,X} \|Y-AX\|_f^2 ~~\mathrm{s.t.}~~ \|X\|_0\leq K,
\end{align}
The advantage is that some non-zero positions with less impact on the objective can be replaced using crucial ones. As a result a more accurate decomposition is produced with different column sparsities across samples.
We introduce a heuristic for attacking this problem, which computes an initial sparsifying dictionary using alternating directions, and then refines it using sequence of support and amplitude adjustments. The initial approximation makes use of a {\em batchwise} orthogonal matching pursuit, which aims at minimizing the $\ell_0$ norm of $X$ as a whole.
The support switching procedure updates the non-zero positions, i.e., the sparsity patterns, in the coefficient matrix $X$ in two ways: inner-row switching and inter-row switching. In the inner-row switching, the total number of non-zeros in each row is fixed, and the non-zero positions are adjusted within the same row; and in the inter-row switching, the total number of non-zeros in pairs of rows is fixed, and the non-zeros are changed between two rows. Finally, we introduce an iterative procedure to adjust the amplitude of the coefficient and dictionary, with the sparsity pattern fixed. The whole algorithm is described in Algorithm \ref{alg:monosvd}.
We prove that in the procedure of sparsity pattern switching and the amplitude adjustment, the objective decreases monotonically and converges.
\begin{algorithm}[tb]
\caption{Inner Row Support Switching}
\label{proc:innerRow}
\begin{algorithmic}
\STATE {\bfseries Input:} $\tilde{Y}\in \mathbb{R}^{m\times p}$, $x\in \mathbb{R}^{1\times p}$, $a\in \mathbb{R}^{m\times 1}$, and $N$.
\STATE {\bfseries Output:} $a^{(+)}\in \mathbb{R}^{m\times 1}$, and $x^{(+)}\in \mathbb{R}^{1\times p}$.
\STATE Denote the support of $x$ as $\Omega$, and $k=|\Omega|$ .
\FOR{$i=1$ {\bfseries to} $N$}
\STATE SVD: $\tilde{Y}_{\Omega}=\sigma_1 ax_{\Omega}+\sum_{1<j\leq m} \sigma_j u_jv_j^T$, s.t., $\sigma_1\geq \sigma_2\dots\geq \sigma_m$, and $\|a\|_2=1$.
\STATE Use the indices of the $k$ largest $\{|a^T\tilde{y}_i|$\} as $\Omega$.
\STATE $x_{\Omega}=a^{T}\tilde{Y}_{\Omega^{}}/\|a\|_2^2$, $x_{{\Omega}^\mathsf{c}}=0$.
\ENDFOR
\STATE $a^{(+)}=a$, $x^{(+)}=x$.
\end{algorithmic}
\end{algorithm}
\subsection{Inner-Row Support Switching}
Suppose we are given the number of non-zeros $k^i$ in each row of $X$. The problem becomes
\begin{align}\label{alg:obj}
\min_{A,X} \|Y-AX\|_f^2~~~\mathrm{s.t.}~~~\|x^i\|_0=k^i, \;\; i = 1, \dots, p.
\end{align}
Note here $x^i$ is the $i$-th row of $X$ compared to the $i$-th column in the $K$-SVD objective. Globally optimizing this objective is challenging, due to the nonconvexity of the constraint set and the objective. Similar to $K$-SVD, we can obtain a simpler subproblem by only considering one row at a time, giving
\begin{equation}
\min_{a_i, x^i} \; \bigl\| Y - \sum_{j\neq i} a_j x^j -a_ix^i\bigr\|_f^2 ~~~\mathrm{s.t.}~~~\|x^i \|_0 \le k^i.
\end{equation}
Setting $\tilde{Y} = Y - \sum_{j \ne i} a_j x^j$, the problem becomes one of finding a rank-one approximation to $\tilde{Y}$, with at most $k^i$ nonzero columns.
We attack this problem using alternating directions. Assuming the support $\Omega^i$ is known and fixed, a best rank one approximation $a_i x^i$ can be fit using the SVD of $\tilde{Y}_{\Omega^i}$. If, on the other hand $a_i$ is fixed, an optimal support $\Omega^i$ can be derived by simply ranking the absolute values of the projected samples, i.e., $|a_i^Ty_i|$. Once the support $\Omega^i$ and the atom $a_i$ are known, $x^i$ can be calculated in closed-form. The resulting algorithm is listed in Algorithm \ref{proc:innerRow}.
\subsection{Inter-Row Support Switching}\label{sec:inter-adj}
\begin{algorithm}[tb]
\caption{Inter Row Support Switching}
\label{proc:interRow}
\begin{algorithmic}
\STATE {\bfseries Input:} $\tilde{Y}\in \mathbb{R}^{m\times p}$, $x^i, x^j\in \mathbb{R}^{1\times p}$, and $a_i,a_j\in \mathbb{R}^{m\times 1}$.
\STATE {\bfseries Output:} $x^{i(+)}, x^{j(+)} \in \mathbb{R}^{1\times p}$.
\STATE 1. Denote the support of $x^i$ and $x^j$ as $\Omega^i$, and $\Omega^j$ respectively, and $\Omega=(\Omega^i\cup\Omega^j)\setminus(\Omega^i\cap \Omega^j)$. Denote $\tilde{\Omega}={(\Omega_i\cap\Omega_j)}^\mathsf{c}$
\STATE 2. Form the matrix $M=[a_i,a_j]^T\tilde{Y}_{\tilde{\Omega}}$.
\STATE 3. Pick up the larger entry of the two rows in each column in $|M|$ as candidates, and use the positions of the largest $|\Omega|$ candidates as $\Omega^{(+)}$.
\STATE 4. Set $X_{\Omega^{(+)}}=M_{\Omega^{(+)}}$, $X_{\tilde{\Omega}\setminus\Omega^{(+)}}=0$, and $X_{\Omega_i\cap\Omega_j}=[x^i;x^j]_{\Omega_i\cap\Omega_j}$.
\STATE 5. Return $x^{i(+)}=e_1^TX$ and $x^{j(+)}=e_2^TX$.
\end{algorithmic}
\end{algorithm}
In this section, we introduce a procedure to adjust the non-zeros between two rows of $X$, such that the reconstruction error in (\ref{alg:obj}) decreases and at the same the total number of non-zeros in the two rows stays the same. First, we define the unique columns in $X_s=[x^i;x^j]$ to be the symmetric difference of the supports of $x^i$ and $x^j$:
\begin{definition} Suppose the support of $x^i$ and $x^j$ are $\Omega^i$ and $\Omega^j$ respectively, then the index set of the unique columns in $\begin{bmatrix}x^i\\x^j\end{bmatrix}$ are
$\Omega=(\Omega^i\cup\Omega^j)\setminus(\Omega^i\cap \Omega^j).$
\end{definition}
If we fix the remaining columns, the residual is
$\tilde{Y}=Y-[A\setminus \{a_i,a_j\}][X\setminus \{x^i,x^j\}].$
Again, if we fix the dictionary atoms $a_i$ and $a_j$, if $\|a_i\|=\|a_j\|=1$, the optimal support for the $|\Omega|$ unique columns can be derived by ranking the absolute values of the projected sample $M=[a_i,a_j]^T\tilde{Y}_{{(\Omega_i\cap\Omega_j)}^\mathsf{c}}$ with the constraint that we can only pick up one non-zero in each column of $M$. The procedure is described in Algorithm \ref{proc:interRow}.
The inter-row support switching reduces the objective in (\ref{alg:obj}) by fixing the dictionary and comparing the importance of non-zero positions by ranking the projected absolute values of the residuals $\tilde{Y}$. If we run the procedure for all pairs of rows in $X$, the total number of non-zeros in $X$ stays the same but their distribution is optimized batchwisely. The procedure is based on fixed dictionary $A$, and the optimization is only carried out on rows of $X$.
Switching supports between all pairs of rows can be expensive when the number of rows $n$ in $X$ grows large. In application, we use two ways to reduce the computation cost:
\begin{enumerate}
\item Instead of going over all pairs of rows in $X$, we only go through a randomly sampled subset of the $(^n_2)$ pairs.
\item The inter-row support switching is only carried out when the objective decreases very slowly in the inner-row support switching.
\end{enumerate}
The inner-row and inter-row support switching interchange the positions of the non-zeros in the coefficient matrix within a batch of samples. In the following section we will introduce a procedure to further reduce the objective by changing the amplitude of the entries in both $A$ and $X$ given the support $\Omega$ of $X$.
\section{Alternating Amplitude Adjustment}\label{sec:globalAdj}
\vskip -0.1in\begin{algorithm
\caption{Alternating Amplitude Adjustment}
\label{proc:glAdj}
\begin{algorithmic}
\STATE {\bfseries Input:} $Y\in \mathbb{R}^{m\times p}$, $X \in \mathbb{R}^{n\times p}$, $A\in \mathbb{R}^{m\times n}$, and $N$.
\STATE {\bfseries Output:} $X^{(+)}\in \mathbb{R}^{n\times p}$, and $A^{(+)} \in \mathbb{R}^{m\times n}$.
\STATE Denote the support of $X$ as $\Omega$, and the support of $x_i$ as $\Omega_i$.
\FOR{$i=1$ {\bfseries to} $N$}
\STATE $A=YX^T(XX^T)^{-1}$.
\FOR{$j=1$ {\bfseries to} $p$}
\STATE $x_j(\Omega_j)=(A_{\Omega_j}^TA_{\Omega_j})^{-1}A_{\Omega_j}^Ty_j$
\STATE $x_j(\Omega_j^\mathsf{c})=0$
\ENDFOR
\ENDFOR
\STATE $X^{(+)}=X$, $A^{(+)}=A$.
\end{algorithmic}
\end{algorithm}
In this section, we propose an alternating optimization algorithm for the following problem:
\begin{align}
\min_{A,X} ~~\|Y-AX\|_f^2, ~~~~~\mathrm{s.t.}~~~ X(\Omega^\mathsf{c})=0
\end{align}
If $X$ is known and fixed, the optimal $A$ can be computed via least squares:
$A=YX^T(XX^T)^{-1}$.
On the other hand, given $A$ and $\Omega$, the objective above decomposes into a sum of samplewise reconstruction errors:
$\min_{X_\Omega}\|Y-AX\|_f^2=\min_{x_j(\Omega_j)}\sum_j\|y_j-A_{\Omega_j}x_j(\Omega_j)\|_2^2$,
which amounts to solving least squares for each column of $X$ sample-by-sample, that is:
$x_j(\Omega_j)=(A_{\Omega_j}^TA_{\Omega_j})^{-1}A_{\Omega_j}^T y_j, ~~\mathrm{and}~~x_j(\Omega_j^\mathsf{c})=0$.
The detailed procedure is shown in Algorithm \ref{proc:glAdj}. It is not hard to see that in each iteration the objective does not increase.
\section{Proof of Monotonicity}\label{sec:proof
The full procedure is described in Algorithm \ref{alg:monosvd}. \footnote{Ways to reduce the computation cost is discussed in section \ref{sec:inter-adj}}. We will show in this section that all the procedures introduced in section (\ref{sec:suppSwitch}) and section (\ref{sec:globalAdj}) only decrease the objective value, while keeping the total number of nonzero coefficients unchanged.
\begin{algorithm}[tb]
\caption{BatchSVD}
\label{alg:monosvd}
\begin{algorithmic}
\STATE {\bfseries Input:} $Y\in \mathbb{R}^{m\times p}$, $A\in \mathbb{R}^{m\times n}$,$X\in \mathbb{R}^{n\times p}$, $N_1$, $\epsilon$, $N_2$.
\STATE {\bfseries Output:} $A^{(+)}\in \mathbb{R}^{m\times n}$, and $X^{(+)}\in \mathbb{R}^{n\times p}$.
\STATE Rearrange column of $A$ and rows of $X$ such that such that $k^1\geq k^2\geq \dots \geq k^n$.
\REPEAT
\FOR{$i=1$ {\bfseries to} $N_1$}
\STATE Run Algorithm \ref{proc:innerRow} with input $\tilde{Y}=Y-[A\setminus a_i][X\setminus x^j]$, $x^i$, $a_i$, and $N$. Update $x^i$, and $a_i$.
\ENDFOR
\STATE Rescale $A$ and $X$, such that $\forall i, \|A_i\|_2=1$.
\FOR{{\bfseries all $(_2^n)$ pairs of rows} \{i,j\}}
\STATE Run Algorithm \ref{proc:interRow} with input $\tilde{Y}=Y-[A\setminus \{a_i,a_j\}][X\setminus \{x^i,x^j\}]$, $x^i,x^j$, $a_i,a_j$. Update $x^i$ and $x^j$.
\ENDFOR
\STATE Run Algorithm \ref{proc:glAdj} with input $Y$, $A$, $X$, and $N_2$. Update $A^{(+)}$ and $X^{(+)}$.
\UNTIL{$\|Y-AX\|_2^2-\|Y-A^{(+)}X^{(+)}\|_2^2\leq \epsilon$}
\end{algorithmic}
\end{algorithm}
\begin{lemma} The objective (\ref{alg:obj}) decreases monotonically in Algorithm \ref{proc:innerRow}.
\end{lemma}\label{lem:obj_dec}
\begin{proof}
Let
$L(a_i,x^i,\Omega^i)= \|\tilde{Y}_i-a_ix^i(\Omega^i)\|_f^2$,
where $\tilde{Y}_i=Y-\sum_{j\neq i}a_j x^j$. For monotonicity, it suffices to show $L(a_i^{(+)},x^{i(+)},\Omega^{i(+)})\leq L(a_i,x^i,\Omega^i)$.
Since
$L(a_i,x^i,\Omega^i) = \|\tilde{Y}_i-a_ix^i(\Omega^i)\|_f^2 =\|\tilde{Y}_{\Omega^i}-a_ix^i_{\Omega^i}\|_f^2+\|\tilde{Y}_{\Omega^{i\mathsf{c}}}\|_f^2$
the second term $\|\tilde{Y}_{\Omega^{i\mathsf{c}}}\|_f^2$ is fixed given $\Omega^i$. Since $\{a_i^{(+)},x^{i(+)}\}$ minimizes $\|\tilde{Y}_{\Omega^i}-a_ix^i_{\Omega^i}\|_f^2$ for any given $\Omega^i$, we have
$L(a_i^{(+)},x^{i(+)},\Omega^i)\leq L(a_i,x^i,\Omega^i)$.
In the second step $a_i^{(+)}$ is fixed, and w.o.l.g. let us assume $\|a_i^{(+)}\|_2=1$. We would like to
\begin{align}
&\min_{\Omega^i,x^i} \|\tilde{Y}-a_i^{(+)}x^i\|_f^2
=\min_{\Omega^i}\min_{x^i}\sum_{j\in {\Omega^i}} \|\tilde{y_j}-a_i^{(+)}x^i(j)\|_2^2+\sum_{j\notin {\Omega^i}} \|\tilde{y_j}\|_2^2\nonumber\\
=&\min_{\Omega^i}\sum_{j\in {\Omega^i}} \min_{x^i_{\Omega_i}}\|\tilde{y_j}-a_i^{(+)}x^i(j)\|_2^2+\sum_{j\notin {\Omega^i}} \|\tilde{y_j}\|_2^
=\min_{\Omega^i}\sum_{j\in {\Omega^i}} (\|\tilde{y_j}\|_2^2-(a_i^{(+)T}\tilde{y_j})^2)+\sum_{j\notin {\Omega^i}} \|\tilde{y_j}\|_2^2\nonumber\\
=&\sum_j\|\tilde{y_j}\|_2^2-\max_{\Omega^i}\sum_{j\in {\Omega^i}} (a_i^{(+)T}\tilde{y_j})^
=\|\tilde{Y}\|_f^2-\max_{\Omega^i} \|a_i^{(+)T}\tilde{Y}_{\Omega^i}\|_2^2
\end{align}
If we would like to choose $k^i$ non-zeros in the $i$th row of $X$, then the optimal way of minimizing the objective is to choose the ones with the largest $|a_i^T\tilde{y_j}|$. Thus $\Omega^i$ corresponding to the $k^i$ entries with the largest $|a_i^T\tilde{y_j}|$s minimizes the reconstruction error. And the corresponding $x^i$ is determined by the projection of $\tilde{Y}_{\Omega^j}$ onto $a_i^{(+)}$.
\end{proof}
In a similar way, we prove the objective (\ref{alg:obj}) decreases monotonically in Algorithm \ref{proc:interRow}. The proof is omitted here.
\textbf{Convergence of the Objective:}
Since the objective values generated by the algorithm is a monotonically decreasing sequence of non-negative real numbers, we know it converges according to the monotone convergence theorem.
\section{Dictionary Initialization}\label{sec:init}
The proposed algorithm, though has a convergent objective, is still a local one. A natural question is how we should initialize the sparsity pattern of $X$.
We use a simple batchwise iterative procedure to generate the initialization of the dictionary for Algorithm \ref{alg:monosvd}.
The initialization procedure is listed in Algorithm (\ref{alg:dictApprox}), where OMP is Orthogonal Mathing Pursuit, and OMP ($\mathrm{vec}(Y), I_p\otimes A, N$) treats the block of samples as a whole compared to the sample-by-sample way in $K$-SVD.
The input of the algorithm (\ref{alg:dictApprox}) includes the total number of non-zeros $N$ in the representation $X$ of a batch of samples $Y$. There is no guarantee that the Dictionary Approximation algorithm converges, but empirically it provides a good initialization for our Batch-SVD algorithm.
\begin{algorithm}[tb]
\caption{Dictionary Approximation using Block OMP}
\label{alg:dictApprox}
\begin{algorithmic}
\STATE {\bfseries Input:} $Y\in \mathbb{R}^{m\times p}$, $A_o$, $N$, $T$.
\STATE {\bfseries Output:} $A\in \mathbb{R}^{m\times n}$ and $X\in \mathbb{R}^{n\times p}$.
\STATE Initialize $X=0$, and $A=A_o$.
\FOR{$t=1$ {\bfseries to} $T$}
\STATE (1) $X\leftarrow$ OMP ($\mathrm{vec}(Y), I_p\otimes A, N$)
\STATE (2) $A\leftarrow \arg\min_A\|Y-AX\|_f^2$.
\ENDFOR
\end{algorithmic}
\end{algorithm}
\section{Experiments}\label{sec:exp}
In this section, we compare our proposed approach to state-of-the-art dictionary learning algorithms on real world data sets, including natural image patches and general machine learning sets. The focus of the experiments is data compression. Data compression is a critical application for dictionary learning. Particularly in the big data regime, if the samples are represented using only a few coefficients, great storage space can be saved. It may also be used in signal communication, where the sender and receiver keep a copy of the dictionary, and only the sparse coefficients are transmitted. In the experiment, we choose a dictionary $A$ and a sparse coefficient matrix $X$, and try to minimize the reconstruction error $\|Y - A X\|_f$ with a given number of non-zeros in $X$. The number of non-zeros is set the same as that produced by $K$-SVD and online dictionary learning, and we compare the reconstruction errors.
\subsection{Data Preparation}
We use $10$ data sets in our experiments. The first one is the demonstration image set provided in the $K$-SVD toolbox \cite{Ron06}, with $5$ images: Barbara, boat, house, Lenna, and peppers. For each image we randomly sample $3000$ overlapping patches of size $8$-by-$8$ as the training set, and use another randomly sampled $3000$ patches as the testing samples in the open-set evaluation. The second data set is the Notre Dame Image library which contains $715$ images taken from the Notre Dame Cathedral in Paris. To make the scales consistent, we resize each image to $512$-by-$512$, and then randomly sample $10,000$ patches as the training set. In the testing stage, we randomly sample $3000$ image patches from the image library for a total of $100$ runs, and report the mean and standard deviation of the reconstruction error.
We also carry out experiments on $8$ UCI data sets, including mnist, iris, yeast, glass, wine, ecoli, liver-disorder, and heart-disease\footnote{We remove the sample columns with `nan' entries in the heart-disease data set.}.
\begin{figure} [tbp]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=6cm]{DictDemoS.jpg}
\includegraphics[width=6cm]{DictDemo_mnist.jpg}
\caption{Demonstration of dictionary atoms learned using our algorithm. The left is the learned dictionary from random patches in the Notre Dame library, and the right is from MNIST digit set.}\label{Fig:dictDemo}
\end{figure}
\subsection{Demonstration of the Dictionary}
For a better illustration we train a square dictionary using $10,000$ randomly sampled image patches of $16$-by-$16$ from the Notre Dame Image data set, and thus the dictionary $A$ has dimensions $256$-by-$256$. The average number of non-zeros per sample is $\|X\|_0/p\approx 2.0223$, and $n=256$. For the MNIST set, we randomly sample $3000$ images from the training set, and learn a $784$-by-$100$ dictionary. The average number of non-zeros per sample is around $6$.
\begin{table}
\centering
\caption{Reconstruction Errors on Natural Image Patches. The digit outside the bracket is the average $L_2$ norm of the errors per patch, and the digit inside the bracket is the standard deviation.}\label{tbl:img_close}
\subtable[Comparison with $K$-SVD]{
\begin{tabular}{|l|c||c|c|c|c|}
\hline
$\times 10$&\textbf{online}&\textbf{KSVD}&\textbf{Wvlet}&\textbf{Rnd}&\textbf{Batch}\\\hline
\textbf{barbara}&2.9(0.8)&2.0(1.0)&3.1(2.5)&7.4(5.7)&1.8(0.4)\\\hline
\textbf{boat}&3.2(0.6)&2.1(0.6)&3.0(1.9)&6.4(5.6)&1.9(0.3)\\\hline
\textbf{house}&2.2(0.8)&1.7(0.9)&3.1(2.7)&6.8(8.3)&1.5(0.4)\\\hline
\textbf{lena}&2.5(0.6)&1.8(0.7)&2.7(2.0)&6.1(6.2)&1.7(0.3)\\\hline
\textbf{peppers}&2.9(0.6)&2.1(0.7)&3.0(1.8)&6.2(6.7)&2.0(0.3)\\\hline
\textbf{ND}&4.3(2.4)&3.1(2.6)&4.0(3.8)&8.2(7.9)&2.7(1.4)\\\hline
\end{tabular}
\label{tab:firsttable}
}
\subtable[Comparison with Error-based KSVD]{
\begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|c|}
\hline
\textbf{ESVD}&\textbf{KSVD}&\textbf{Wvlet}&\textbf{Rnd}&\textbf{Batch}\\\hline
2.5(0.4)&3.1(1.7)&5.0(4.1)&10.3(8.1)&2.4(0.6)\\\hline
2.7(0.3)&3.2(1.1)&4.7(3.3)&8.8(7.8)&2.6(0.4)\\\hline
2.2(0.8)&2.7(1.9)&5.0(5.1)&8.6(10.4)&2.1(0.8)\\\hline
2.4(0.4)&3.0(1.8)&5.0(4.9)&8.3(8.7)&2.3(0.6)\\\hline
2.6(0.3)&2.9(1.1)&4.3(3.4)&7.9(8.6)&2.5(0.5)\\\hline
2.4(0.8)&2.7(2.2)&3.4(3.2)&7.2(6.6)&2.1(1.0)\\\hline
\end{tabular}
\label{tab:secondtable}
}
\end{table}
\subsection{Reconstruction on Natural Image Patches}
We compare our algorithm with the online dictionary learning, $K$-SVD, and the overcomplete wavelets with orthogonal matching pursuit. Also the result using a Gaussian random dictionary with OMP is presented as a baseline.
For the online dictionary learning, we set $\lambda=10$. \footnote{We use SPAMS \cite{SPAMS} with the default batch size 512 in our evaluation.} Since the sparsity for the online dictionary learning is only softly constrained, we first run the online dictionary learning algorithm and then force $k=\lfloor\|X_{online}\|_0/p\rfloor$ in the $K$-SVD algorithm, such that the total number of non-zeros in the representation derived using $K$-SVD is not larger than that of the online learning algorithm. We then set the number of non-zeros in our algorithm to be exactly the same as the $K$-SVD algorithm.
The iteration number of online learning and $K$-SVD is set as $100$. The iteration number for our algorithm is set at $20$ with $N_1=3$ and $N_2=10$. To accelarate the algorithm, the inter-row support switching is only carried out when the objective decrement in the inner-row adjusment is smaller than $0.05$. The iteration number of the initialization precedure (\ref{alg:dictApprox}) is set at $80$. For the image data sets, the number of atoms in the dictionary $A$ is $n=256$.
\begin{table}
\caption{Reconstruction Errors on the UCI Data Sets. The digit outside the bracket is the average $L_2$ norm of the errors per sample, and the digit inside the bracket is the standard deviation.}\label{tbl:UCI_close}
\centering
\subtable[Comparison with $K$-SVD]{
\begin{tabular}{|l|c||c|c|c|}
\hline
$\times 10^{-3}$&\textbf{online}&\textbf{KSVD}&\textbf{Rnd}&\textbf{Batch}\\\hline
\textbf{liver}&22.6(4.0)&7.2(6.9)&51.9(35.6)&5.8(7.3)\\\hline
\textbf{iris}&20.1(0.1)&522.1(275.9)&102.1(46.3)&11.1(12.4)\\\hline
\textbf{yeast}&27.8(7.5)&8.1(8.6)&36.2(25.6)&7.9(8.5)\\\hline
\textbf{glass}&20.1(0.2)&57.6(26.7)&68.5(35.4)&0.9(0.5)\\\hline
\textbf{wine}&20.1(0.1)&64.8(30.9)&258.1(10.5)&1.6(0.7)\\\hline
\textbf{ecoli}&27.7(3.5)&8.7(9.5)&50.4(37.3)&2.9(3.7)\\\hline
\textbf{heart}&21.3(0.9)&173.6(103.5)&345.6(33.8)&8.2(2.7)\\\hline
\end{tabular}
\label{tab:firsttable-2}
}
\subtable[Comparison with Error-based KSVD]{
\begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|c|}
\hline
\textbf{ESVD}&\textbf{KSVD}&\textbf{Rnd}&\textbf{Batch}\\\hline
0.8(1.9)&7.4(6.5)&40.7(24.3)&0.6(1.3)\\\hline
491.0(309.7)&331.4(287.1)&152.1(55.4)&2.6(4.1)\\\hline
2.0(2.9)&14.5(15.0)&37.2(27.4)&3.1(4.9)\\\hline
50.7(65.4)&45.7(24.3)&442.3(11.7)&3.7(2.3)\\\hline
80.0(45.7)&66.4(39.6)&797.2(1.5)&4.8(2.8)\\\hline
1.6(2.4)&16.7(17.9)&41.0(28.7)&2.5(3.5)\\\hline
172.7(82.4)&182.7(86.0)&334.4(22.6)&5.1(1.6)\\\hline
\end{tabular}
\label{tab:secondtable-2}
}
\end{table}
\subsection{Reconstruction on UCI Data Sets}
We also carried out experiments on the UCI data sets. For all the algorithms, we set the number of atoms in the dictionary $n=30$. The data vectors are normalized to have unit norm before feeding into the algorithms. Again we first run the online dictionary learning algorithm with $\lambda=0.02$, and then set $k=\lfloor \|X_{online}\|_0/p\rfloor$, where $X_{online}$ is the coefficient derived using the online learning algorithm. We set the same number of non-zeros for our batch dictionary learning algorithm as that produced by $K$-SVD.
The reconstruction errors are listed in the first part of Table (\ref{tbl:img_close}) and Table (\ref{tbl:UCI_close}). We can see that the batchwise algorithm works consistently better than the other methods.
\subsection{Reconstruction-Error Based $K$-SVD}
We also compared with the reconstruction-error-based $K$-SVD (ESVD) algorithm proposed in \cite{Rubinstein08}. Since it is not easy to control exactly the number of non-zeros produced by ESVD, again we we first run ESVD and then set the number of non-zeros in our algorithm to be exactly the same as the ESVD algorithm. For comparison the reconstruction errors of the original $K$-SVD, wavelets, and random dictionary are also presented with $k=\lfloor \|X_{ESVD}\|_0/p\rfloor$. For the Notre Dame library we set the reconstruction error $\epsilon=30$ , yielding an average sparsity $k\approx 9$ per sample. For the UCI data sets we set $\epsilon=0.01$. The results are presented in the second part of Table (\ref{tbl:img_close}) and (\ref{tbl:UCI_close}), from which we observe that the ESVD algorithm performs reasonably better than the original $K$-SVD algorithm. The batchwise algorithm, with the same sparsity level, gives better approximations on all the sets except yeast and ecoli.
\section{Conclusion}\label{sec:conclu}
In this paper we propose a monotone dictionary learning algorithm that is optimized for sample batches. The reconstruction error is minimized by a series of support switching procedures withing the sample batch. We prove the objective monotonically decreases and converges in the support switching procedures. Using the proposed block orthogonal matching pursuit algorithm as a warm start, the batchSVD algorithm gives a better approximation in terms of the reconstruction error at the same level of sparsity.
\bibliographystyle{plain}
|
\section{Introduction}
Dynamic networks consist of entities making contact over time with one
another. The types of dynamics resulting from these interactions are
varied in scale and nature. For instance, some of these networks remain
connected at all times~\cite{OW05}; others are always
disconnected~\cite{JFP04} but still offer some kind of connectivity over
time and space ({\em temporal} connectivity); others are recurrently
connected, periodic, etc. All of these contexts can be represented as
dynamic graph classes. A dozen such classes were identified
in~\cite{CFQS12} and organized into a hierarchy.
Given a dynamic graph, a natural question to ask is to which of the classes
this graph belongs. This question is interesting because most of the known
classes of dynamic graphs correspond to necessary or sufficient conditions
for given distributed problems or algorithms (broadcast, election, spanning
trees, token forwarding, etc.). Thus, being able to classify a graph in the
hierarchy is useful for determining which problems can be successfully solved
and which algorithms can be executed on that graph. Furthermore, classification
tools, such as testing algorithms for given classes, can be useful for
choosing a good algorithm in settings where the evolution of a network is
not known in advance. An algorithm designer can record
topological traces from the real world and then test whether the
corresponding dynamic graphs are included in classes that
correspond to the topological conditions for the problem at hand~\cite{CCF09}.
Alternatively, online algorithms that process dynamic graphs as they evolve
could accomplish the same goal without the need to collect traces.
Dynamic graphs can be modelled in a number of ways. It is often
convenient, when looking at the topology from a global standpoint
(e.g., a recorded trace), to represent a dynamic graph as a sequence of
graphs ${\cal{G}}=(G_1,G_2,...,G_\delta)$, each of which corresponds to
the state of the dynamic graph at a given discrete time instant.
(also known as {\em untimed} evolving
graphs~\cite{BFJ03}). Solutions for testing the inclusion of such a
dynamic graph in a handful of basic classes were provided
in~\cite{CCF09}; these classes are those in which a {\em journey} (temporal
path) or {\em strict journey} (a journey that traverses at most one edge
per $G_i$) exists between any pair of nodes. In this particular
case, the problem reduces to testing whether the transitive closure of
(strict) journeys is a complete graph. The transitive closure itself
can be computed efficiently in a number of ways~\cite{BCCJN14,BFJ03,WDCG12}.
To the best of our knowledge, no further work has been done on testing
properties of dynamic graphs.
Recently, the class of {\em $T$-interval connected} graphs was
identified in~\cite{KLO10} as playing an important role in several distributed
problems, such as determining the size of a network or computing a
function of the initial inputs of the nodes. Informally, $T$-interval
connectivity requires that there exists a common connected spanning subgraph
for every $T$ consecutive graphs in the sequence ${\cal{G}}$.
This class generalizes the class of dynamic
graphs that are connected at all time instants~\cite{OW05}. Indeed, the
latter corresponds to the case that $T=1$. From a
set-theoretic viewpoint, however, every $T>1$ induces a class of graphs
that is a strict subset of the class in~\cite{OW05} because a graph that is
$T$-interval connected is obviously $1$-interval connected. Hence,
$T$-interval connectivity is more specialized in this sense.
In this paper, we look at the problem of deciding whether a given
sequence ${\cal{G}}$ is $T$-interval connected for a given $T$. We also
consider the related problem of finding the largest $T$ for which the
given ${\cal{G}}$ is $T$-interval connected. We assume that the changes
between two consecutive graphs are arbitrary and
we do not make any assumptions about the data structures that are
used to represent the sequence of graphs. As such, we
focus on high-level strategies that work directly at the graph level.
Precisely, we consider two graph-level operations as building blocks:
{\em binary intersection} (given two graphs, compute their
intersection) and {\em connectivity testing} (given a graph, decide
whether it is connected). Put together, these operations have a strong
and natural connection with the problems that we are studying.
We first show that
both problems require $\Omega(\delta)$ such operations using the basic
argument that every graph of the sequence must be considered at least
once. More surprisingly, we show that both problems can be solved
using only $O(\delta)$ such operations and we develop optimal online
algorithms that achieve these matching bounds. Hence, the cost of the
operations --~both of them linear in the number of edges~-- is counterbalanced
by efficient high-level logic that could, for instance, benefit from
dedicated circuits (or optimized code) for both operations.
The paper is organized as follows. Section~\ref{sec:definitions}
presents the main definitions and makes some basic observations,
including the fact that both problems can be solved using
$O(\delta^2)$ operations (intersections or connectivity tests) by a
naive strategy that examines $O(\delta^2)$ intermediate graphs.
Section~\ref{sec:intermediate} presents a second strategy, yielding
upper bounds of $O(\delta \log \delta)$ operations for both problems.
Its main interest is in the fact that it can be parallelized, and this
allows us to classify both problems as being in {\bf NC} (i.e. Nick's
class). In Section~\ref{sec:optimal} we present an optimal
strategy which we use to solve both problems online in $O(\delta)$
operations. This strategy exploits structural properties of the
problems to construct carefully selected subsequences of the
intermediate graphs. In particular, only $O(\delta)$ of the
$O(\delta^2)$ intermediate graphs are selected for evaluation by the
algorithms.
\joe{In Section ~\ref{sec:dynamic}, we extend our online algorithms to a
dynamic setting in which the measure of connectivity is based on the recent
evolution of the network.}
\section{Definitions and Basic Observations}
\label{sec:definitions}
\boldpara{Graph Model.}
In this work, we consider dynamic graphs that are given as untimed evolving graphs, that is, a sequence ${\cal{G}}=(G_1,G_2,...,G_\delta)$ of graphs such that $G_i=(V,E_i)$ describes the network topology at (discrete) time $i$. The parameter $\delta$ is called the {\em length} of the sequence ${\cal{G}}$. It corresponds to the number of time steps that this graph covers. Observe that $V$ is non-varying; only the set of edges varies.
Unless otherwise stated, we consider {\em undirected} edges throughout the paper, which is the setting in which $T$-interval connectivity was originally introduced. However, the fact that our algorithms are high-level allows them to work exactly the same for $T$-interval strong connectivity (which is the analogue of $T$-interval connectivity for directed graphs~\cite{KLO10}), provided that both basic operations (i.e. intersection and connectivity test) are given. As we shall discuss, these operations have linear cost in the number of edges in both directed and undirected graphs.
\begin{definition}[Intersection graph]
Given a (finite) set $S$ of graphs $\{G'=(V,E'),G''=(V,E''),\dots\}$, we call the graph $(V,\cap\{E',E'',\dots\})$ the {\em intersection graph} of $S$ and denote it by $\cap\{G',G'',\dots\}$. When the set consists of only two graphs, we talk about {\em binary intersection} and use the infix notation $G' \cap G''$. If the intersection involves a consecutive subsequence $(G_i,G_{i+1},\dots,G_j)$ of a dynamic graph ${\cal{G}}$, then we denote the intersection graph $\cap\{G_i,G_{i+1},\dots,G_j\}$ simply as $G_{(i,j)}$.
\end{definition}
\begin{definition}[\boldmath $T$-interval connectivity]
A dynamic graph ${\cal{G}}$ is said to be {\em $T$-interval connected} if
the intersection graph $G_{(t,t+T-1)}$ is connected for every $t\in [1, \delta-T+1]$. In other words, all graphs in $\{G_t,G_{t+1},...,G_{t+T-1}\}$ share a common connected spanning subgraph.
\end{definition}
\begin{definition}[Testing \boldmath $T$-interval connectivity]
We will use the term {\scshape $T$-Interval-Connectivity}\xspace to refer to the problem of deciding whether a dynamic graph ${\cal{G}}$ is $T$-interval connected for a given $T$.
\end{definition}
\begin{definition}[Interval connectivity]
We will use {\scshape Interval-Connectivity}\xspace to refer to the problem of finding $\max\{T: {\cal{G}}$ is $T$-interval connected$\}$ for a given ${\cal{G}}$.
\end{definition}
Let ${\cal{G}}^{T}=(G_{(1,T)},G_{(2,T+1)},...,G_{(\delta-T+1,\delta)})$. We call ${\cal{G}}^T$ the $T^{th}$ {\em row} in ${\cal{G}}$'s intersection hierarchy, as depicted in Fig.~\ref{fig:example}. A particular case is ${\cal{G}}^1={\cal{G}}$. For any $1 \leq i \leq \delta-T+1$, we define $\IG{T}{i} = G_{(i,i+T-1)}$. We call $\IG{T}{i}$ the {\em $i^{th}$ element of row ${\cal{G}}^T$} and $i$ is called the {\em index of $\IG{T}{i}$ in row ${\cal{G}}^T$}.
\begin{observation}\label{obs:row-connected}
A dynamic graph ${\cal{G}}$ is $T$-interval connected if and only if all graphs in ${\cal{G}}^T$ are connected.
\end{observation}
\def\carre (#1,#2,#3){
\path (#1,#2+1) node[node] (a){};
\path (#1+1,#2+1) node[node] (b){};
\path (#1,#2) node[node] (c){};
\path (#1+1,#2) node[node] (d){};
\path (#1+.5,#2-.8) node (e){#3};
}
\newcommand{\g}[2]{\ensuremath{G_{#1}^{#2}}}
\tikzstyle{every node}=[]
\begin{figure}
\centering
\begin{tabular}{cccc}
\begin{tikzpicture}[scale=.5]
\node (G) []
at (-1.6,0.5) {\large{${\cal{G}}^1$}};
\node (G) []
at (-0.4,3.0) {\large{${\cal{G}}^2$}};
\node (G) []
at (1,5.5) {\large{${\cal{G}}^3$}};
\node (G) []
at (2.4,8.0) {\large{${\cal{G}}^4$}};
\carre (0,0,$G_1$)
\draw (a)--(b);
\draw (a)--(c);
\draw (c)--(b);
\draw (c)--(d);
\draw (b)--(d);
\carre (3,0,$G_2$)
\draw (a)--(c);
\draw (c)--(b);
\draw (c)--(d);
\draw (a)--(b);
\carre (6,0,$G_3$)
\draw (a)--(c);
\draw (d)--(b);
\draw (c)--(d);
\draw (a)--(b);
\carre (9,0,$G_4$)
\draw (a)--(c);
\draw (b)--(c);
\draw (d)--(b);
\draw (c)--(d);
\draw (a)--(b);
\carre (12,0,$G_5$)
\draw (b)--(c);
\draw (a)--(d);
\draw (d)--(b);
\draw (c)--(d);
\draw (a)--(b);
\carre (15,0,$G_6$)
\draw (b)--(c);
\draw (d)--(b);
\draw (c)--(d);
\draw (a)--(b);
\carre (18,0,$G_7$)
\draw (b)--(c);
\draw (c)--(d);
\draw (a)--(b);
\carre (21,0,$G_8$)
\draw (a)--(b);
\draw (a)--(c);
\draw (b)--(c);
\draw (c)--(d);
\carre (1.5,2.5,$G_{(1,2)}$)
\draw (a)--(b);
\draw (a)--(c);
\draw (c)--(b);
\draw (c)--(d);
\carre (4.5,2.5,$G_{(2,3)}$)
\draw (a)--(c);
\draw (a)--(b);
\draw (c)--(d);
\carre (7.5,2.5,$G_{(3,4)}$)
\draw (a)--(c);
\draw (b)--(d);
\draw (a)--(b);
\draw (c)--(d);
\carre (10.5,2.5,$G_{(4,5)}$)
\draw (b)--(c);
\draw (b)--(d);
\draw (a)--(b);
\draw (c)--(d);
\carre (13.5,2.5,$G_{(5,6)}$)
\draw (b)--(c);
\draw (b)--(d);
\draw (a)--(b);
\draw (c)--(d);
\carre (16.5,2.5,$G_{(6,7)}$)
\draw (b)--(c);
\draw (c)--(d);
\draw (a)--(b);
\carre (19.5,2.5,$G_{(7,8)}$)
\draw (a)--(b);
\draw (b)--(c);
\draw (c)--(d);
\carre (3,5.0,$G_{(1,3)}$)
\draw (a)--(b);
\draw (a)--(c);
\draw (c)--(d);
\carre (6,5.0,$G_{(2,4)}$)
\draw (a)--(b);
\draw (a)--(c);
\draw (c)--(d);
\carre (9,5.0,$G_{(3,5)}$)
\draw (a)--(b);
\draw (b)--(d);
\draw (c)--(d);
\carre (12,5.0,$G_{(4,6)}$)
\draw (b)--(c);
\draw (b)--(d);
\draw (a)--(b);
\draw (c)--(d);
\carre (15,5.0,$G_{(5,7)}$)
\draw (b)--(c);
\draw (a)--(b);
\draw (c)--(d);
\carre (18,5.0,$G_{(6,8)}$)
\draw (b)--(c);
\draw (a)--(b);
\draw (c)--(d);
\carre (4.5,7.5,$G_{(1,4)}$)
\draw (a)--(b);
\draw (a)--(c);
\draw (c)--(d);
\carre (7.5,7.5,{$G_{(2,5)}$})
\draw (a)--(b);
\draw (c)--(d);
\begin{scope}
\tikzstyle{every node}=[]
\path (8,7.1) node {$\times$};
\end{scope}
\carre (10.5,7.5,$G_{(3,6)}$)
\draw (a)--(b);
\draw (c)--(d);
\draw (b)--(d);
\carre (13.5,7.5,$G_{(4,7)}$)
\draw (a)--(b);
\draw (c)--(d);
\draw (b)--(c);
\carre (16.5,7.5,$G_{(5,8)}$)
\draw (a)--(b);
\draw (c)--(d);
\draw (b)--(c);
\end{tikzpicture}
\end{tabular}
\caption{\label{fig:example} Example of an intersection hierarchy for a given dynamic graph ${\cal{G}}$ of length $\delta=8$. Here, ${\cal{G}}$ is 3-interval connected, but not 4-interval connected; ${\cal{G}}^4$ contains a disconnected graph $G_{(2,5)}$ because $G_2,G_3,G_4,G_5$ share no connected spanning subgraph.}
\end{figure}
\boldpara{Computational Model.}
As shown in Observation~1, the concept of $T$-interval connectivity can be reformulated quite naturally in terms of the connectivity of some intersection graphs. For this reason, we consider two building block operations: {\em binary intersection} (given two graphs, compute their intersection) and {\em connectivity testing} (given a graph, decide whether it is connected). This approach is suitable for a high-level study of these problems when the details of changes between successive graphs in a sequence are arbitrary. If more structural information about the evolution of the dynamic graphs is known,
for example, if it is known that the number of changes between each pair of consecutive graphs is bounded by a constant,
then algorithms could benefit from the use of sophisticated data structures and a lower-level approach might be more appropriate.
\begin{observation}[Cost of the operations]
Using an adjacency list data structure for the graphs, a
binary intersection can be performed in linear time in the number of edges. Checking connectivity of a graph can also be done in linear time in the number of edges. In the case of undirected graphs, it can be done by building a depth-first search tree from an arbitrary root node and testing whether all nodes are reachable from the root node. Tarjan's algorithm for strongly connected components can be used for directed graphs.
Hence, both the {\em intersection} operation and the {\em connectivity testing} operation have similar costs.
In what follows, we will refer to them as {\em elementary} operations. One advantage of using these elementary operations is that the high-level logic of the algorithms becomes elegant and simple. Also, their cost can be counterbalanced by the fact that they are highly generic and thus could benefit from dedicated circuits (e.g., FPGA) or optimized code.
\end{observation}
\boldpara{Naive Upper Bound.}
One can easily see that both problems are solvable using $O(\delta^2)$ elementary operations based on a naive strategy. It suffices to compute the rows of ${\cal{G}}'s$ intersection hierarchy incrementally using the fact that each graph $G_{(i,j)}$ can be obtained as $G_{(i,j-1)}\cap G_{(i+1,j)}$. For instance, $G_{(3,6)}=G_{(3,5)}\cap G_{(4,6)}$ in Fig.~\ref{fig:example}. Hence, each row $k$ can be computed from row $k-1$ using $O(\delta)$ binary intersections. In the case of {\scshape $T$-Interval-Connectivity}\xspace, one simply has to repeat the operation until the $T^{th}$ row, then answer {\tt true} iff all graphs in this row are connected. The total cost is $O(\delta T)=O(\delta^2)$ binary intersections, plus $\delta-T+1=O(\delta)$ connectivity tests for the $T^{th}$ row. Solving {\scshape Interval-Connectivity}\xspace is similar except that one needs to test the connectivity of all new graphs during the process. If a disconnected graph is first found in some row $k$, then the answer is $k-1$. If all graphs are connected up to row $\delta$, then $\delta$ is the answer. Since there are $O(\delta^2)$ graphs in the intersection hierarchy, the total number of connectivity tests and binary intersections is $O(\delta^2)$.
\bigskip
\boldpara{Lower Bound.}
The following lower bound is valid for any algorithm that uses only the two elementary operations {\em binary intersection} and {\em connectivity test}.
\begin{lemma}\label{lem:lower-bound}
$\Omega(\delta)$ elementary operations are necessary to solve {\scshape $T$-Interval-Connectivity}\xspace.
\end{lemma}
\begin{proof}[by contradiction]
Let ${\cal A}$ be an algorithm that uses only elementary operations and that decides whether any sequence of graphs is $T$-interval connected in $o(\delta)$ operations. Then, for any sequence ${\cal{G}}$, at least one graph in ${\cal{G}}$ is never accessed by ${\cal A}$. Let ${\cal{G}}_1$ be a sequence that is $T$-interval connected and suppose that ${\cal A}$ decides that ${\cal{G}}_1$ is $T$-interval connected without accessing graph $G_k$. Now, consider a sequence ${\cal{G}}_2$ that is identical to ${\cal{G}}_1$ except $G_k$ is replaced by a disconnected graph $G_k'$.
Since $G_k'$ is never accessed, the executions of ${\cal A}$ on ${\cal{G}}_1$ and ${\cal{G}}_2$ are identical and ${\cal A}$ incorrectly decides that ${\cal{G}}_2$ is $T$-interval connected. \qed
\end{proof}
A similar argument can be used for {\scshape Interval-Connectivity}\xspace by making the answer $T$ dependent on the graph $G_k$ that is never accessed.
\section{Row-Based Strategy}
\label{sec:intermediate}
In this section, we present a basic strategy that improves upon the previous naive strategy, yielding upper bounds of $O(\delta \log \delta)$ operations for both problems. Its main interest is in the fact that it can be parallelized, and this allows us to show that both problems are in {\bf NC}, i.e. parallelizable on a PRAM with a polylogarithmic running time.
We first describe the algorithms for a sequential machine (RAM).
The general strategy is to compute only some of the rows of ${\cal{G}}$'s intersection hierarchy based on the following lemma.
\begin{lemma}\label{lem:row-based}
If some row ${\cal{G}}^{k}$ is already computed, then any row ${\cal{G}}^{\ell}$ for $k+1 \leq \ell \leq 2k$ can be computed with $O(\delta)$ elementary operations.
\end{lemma}
\begin{proof}
Assume that row ${\cal{G}}^{k}$ is already computed and that one wants to compute row ${\cal{G}}^{\ell}$ for some $k+1 \leq \ell \leq 2k$. Note that row ${\cal{G}}^{\ell}$ consists of the entries $\IG{\ell}{1},\ldots,\IG{\ell}{\delta-\ell+1}$.
Now, observe that for any $k+1 \leq \ell \leq 2k$ and for any $1 \leq i \leq \delta-\ell+1$,
$\IG{\ell}{i} = G_{(i,i+\ell-1)} = G_{(i,i+k-1)} \cap G_{(i+\ell-k,i+\ell-1)} = \IG{k}{i} \cap \IG{k}{i+\ell-k}$.
Hence, $\delta-\ell+1 = O(\delta)$ intersections are sufficient to compute all of the entries of row ${\cal{G}}^{\ell}$. \qed
\end{proof}
\boldpara{\boldmath $T$-{\scshape Interval-Connectivity}\xspace.}
Using Lemma~\ref{lem:row-based}, we can incrementally compute ``power rows'' ${\cal{G}}^{2^{i}}$ for all $i$ from $1$ to $\lceil\log_2 T\rceil-1$ without computing the intermediate rows. Then, we compute row ${\cal{G}}^T$ directly from row ${\cal{G}}^{2^{\lceil\log_2 T\rceil-1}}$ (again using Lemma~\ref{lem:row-based}). This way, we compute $\lceil\log_2 T\rceil=O(\log \delta)$ rows using $O(\delta \log \delta)$ intersections, after which we perform $O(\delta)$ connectivity tests.\\
\boldpara{{\scshape Interval-Connectivity}\xspace.}
Here, we incrementally compute rows ${\cal{G}}^{2^{i}}$ until we find a row that contains a disconnected graph (thus, a connectivity test is performed after each intersection). By Lemma~\ref{lem:row-based}, each of these rows can be computed using $O(\delta)$ intersections.
Suppose that row ${\cal{G}}^{2^{j+1}}$ is the first power row that contains a disconnected graph, and that ${\cal{G}}^{2^j}$ is the row computed before ${\cal{G}}^{2^{j+1}}$. Next, we do
a binary search of the rows between ${\cal{G}}^{2^j}$ and ${\cal{G}}^{2^{j+1}}$ to find the row ${\cal{G}}^{T}$ with the highest row number $T$ such that all graphs on this row are connected (see Fig.~\ref{power} for an illustration of the algorithm). The computation of each of these rows is based on row ${\cal{G}}^{2^j}$ and takes $O(\delta)$ intersections by Lemma~\ref{lem:row-based}. Overall, we compute at most $2 \lceil\log_2 T\rceil = O(\log \delta)$ rows using $O(\delta \log \delta)$ intersections and the same number of connectivity tests.
\begin{figure}
\floatbox[{\capbeside\thisfloatsetup{capbesideposition={left,bottom},capbesidewidth=6cm}}]{figure}[\FBwidth]
{\caption{Example of interval connectivity testing based on the computation of power rows. Here $\delta=16$ and $T=11$. The computation of power rows stops upon reaching ${\cal{G}}^{16}$ which contains a disconnected graph (\red{$\times$}). A binary search between rows ${\cal{G}}^8$ and ${\cal{G}}^{16}$ is then used to find ${\cal{G}}^{11}$, the highest row where all graphs are connected.}\label{power}}
{
\xdefinecolor{bordeaux}{rgb}{0.7,0.10,0.10}
\begin{tikzpicture}[scale=0.3]
\node (l1) [] at (0.5,-16) {};
\node (l2) [] at (1,-15) {};
\node (l4) [] at (2,-13) {};
\node (l8) [] at (4,-9) {};
\node (l10) [] at (5,-7.2) {};
\node (l11) [] at (5.5,-6) {};
\node (l12) [] at (6,-5) {};
\node (l16) [] at (8,-1) {};
\node () [font=\Large, red] at (7.9,-1) {$\times$};
\node () [font=\Large, red] at (5.9,-5) {$\times$};
\node (T) [font=\large] at (13.5,-6) {$T$};
\tikzstyle{searchPath}=[->,thick]
\tikzstyle{row}=[draw,rectangle,rounded corners]
\draw[->, >=latex] (T) to (11.7,-6);
\draw[searchPath] (l1) to[bend left=40] (0.8,-15);
\draw[searchPath] (l2) to[bend left=40] (l4);
\draw[searchPath] (l4) to[bend left] (l8);
\draw[searchPath] (l8) to[bend left] (l16);
\draw[searchPath] (l16) to[bend right] (l12);
\draw[searchPath] (l12) to[bend right=40] (l10);
\draw[searchPath] (5.2,-6.5) to[bend left=20] (5.4,-5.9);
\tikzstyle{every node}=[draw, circle, inner sep=2pt,darkgray]
\foreach \j in {5,7,9,13,15,16}{
\foreach \i in {2,...,\j}{
\pgfmathsetmacro{\ii}{\i + (16-\j)/2};
\draw[lightgray,ultra thick] (\ii-1,-\j) -- (\ii,-\j);
}
}
\foreach \j in {1,5,7,9,13,15,16}{
\foreach \i in {1,...,\j}{
\pgfmathsetmacro{\ii}{\i + (16-\j)/2};
\path (\ii,-\j) node[fill=lightgray] (\i\j){};
}
}
\tikzstyle{every node}=[draw, circle, inner sep=2pt,darkgray]
\foreach \j in {1,...,16}{
\foreach \i in {1,...,\j}{
\pgfmathsetmacro{\ii}{\i + (16-\j)/2};
\path (\ii,-\j) node[thin] (\i\j){};
}
}
\foreach \j in {6}{
\foreach \i in {1,...,\j}{
\pgfmathsetmacro{\ii}{\i + (16-\j)/2};
\path (\ii,-\j) node[fill=bordeaux] (\i\j){};
}
}
\foreach \j in {6}{
\foreach \i in {2,...,\j}{
\pgfmathsetmacro{\ii}{\i + (16-\j)/2};
\draw[bordeaux,thick] (\ii-1,-\j) -- (\ii,-\j);
}
}
\tikzstyle{every path}=[thin,dashed,gray,dash pattern=on 1pt off 1.5pt]
\foreach \j in {1,...,15}{
\foreach \i in {1,...,\j}{
\pgfmathtruncatemacro{\jj}{\j + 1};
\pgfmathtruncatemacro{\ii}{\i + 1};
\draw (\i\jj) -- (\i\j);
\draw (\ii\jj) -- (\i\j);
}
}
\end{tikzpicture}
}
\end{figure}
Now we establish that these problems are in {\bf NC} by showing that our algorithms are efficiently parallelizable.
\begin{lemma}\label{lem:row-based-parallel}
If some row ${\cal{G}}^{k}$ is already computed, then any row between ${\cal{G}}^{k+1}$ and ${\cal{G}}^{2k}$ can be computed in $O(1)$ time on an EREW PRAM with $O(\delta)$ processors.
\end{lemma}
\begin{proof}
Assume that row ${\cal{G}}^{k}$ is already computed, and that one wants to compute row ${\cal{G}}^{\ell}$, consisting of the entries $\IG{\ell}{1},\ldots,\IG{\ell}{\delta-\ell+1}$, for some $k+1 \leq \ell \leq 2k$.
Since $\IG{\ell}{i} = \IG{k}{i} \cap \IG{k}{i+\ell-k}$, $1 \leq i \leq \delta-\ell+1$, the computation of row ${\cal{G}}^{\ell}$ can be implemented on an EREW PRAM with $\delta-\ell+1$ processors in two rounds as follows.
Let $P_i$, $1 \leq i \leq \delta-\ell+1$, be the processor dedicated to computing $\IG{\ell}{i}$. In the first round $P_i$ reads $\IG{k}{i}$, and in the second round $P_i$ reads $\IG{k}{i+\ell-k}$. This guarantees that each $P_i$ has exclusive access to the entries of row ${\cal{G}}^{k}$ that it needs for its computation.
Hence, row ${\cal{G}}^{\ell}$ can be computed in $O(1)$ time on an EREW PRAM using $O(\delta)$ processors. \qed
\end{proof}
\boldpara{\boldmath $T$-{\scshape Interval-Connectivity}\xspace on an EREW PRAM.}
The sequential algorithm for this problem computes $O(\log \delta)$ rows. By Lemma~\ref{lem:row-based-parallel}, each of these rows can be computed in $O(1)$ time on an EREW PRAM with $O(\delta)$ processors. Therefore, all of the rows (and hence all necessary intersections) can be computed in $O(\log \delta)$ time with $O(\delta)$ processors.
The $O(\delta)$ connectivity tests for row ${\cal{G}}^T$ can be done in $O(1)$ time with $O(\delta)$ processors. Then, the processors can establish whether or not all graphs in row ${\cal{G}}^T$ are connected by computing the logical AND of the results of the $O(\delta)$ connectivity tests in time $O(\log \delta)$ on a EREW PRAM with $O(\delta)$ processors using standard techniques (see~\cite{GR88,Ja92}). The total time is $O(\log \delta)$ on an EREW PRAM with $O(\delta)$ processors.\\
\boldpara{{\scshape Interval-Connectivity}\xspace on an EREW PRAM.}
The sequential algorithm for this problem computes $O(\log \delta)$ rows.
Differently from {\scshape $T$-Interval-Connectivity}\xspace, a connectivity test is done for each of the computed graphs (rather than just those of the last row) and it has to be determined for each computed row whether or not all of the graphs are connected. This takes $O(\log \delta)$ time for each of the $O(\log \delta)$ computed rows using the same techniques as for {\scshape $T$-Interval-Connectivity}\xspace.
The total time is $O(\log^2 \delta)$ on an EREW PRAM with $O(\delta)$ processors.\\
\section{Optimal Solution}
\label{sec:optimal}
We now present our strategy for solving both {\scshape $T$-Interval-Connectivity}\xspace and {\scshape Interval-Connectivity}\xspace using a linear number of elementary operations (in the length $\delta$ of ${\cal{G}}$),
matching the $\Omega(\delta)$ lower bound presented in Section~\ref{sec:definitions}.
The strategy relies on the concept of {\em ladder}. Informally, a ladder is a sequence of graphs that ``climbs'' the intersection hierarchy bottom-up.
\begin{definition}
The {\em right ladder of length $l$ at index $i$}, denoted by $\rlad{l}{i}$, is the sequence of intersection graphs $(\IG{k}{i}, \, k=1,2,\ldots,l)$. The {\em left ladder of length $l$ at index $i$}, denoted by $\llad{l}{i}$, is the sequence $(\IG{k}{i-k+1}, \, k=1,2,\ldots,l)$. A right ({\it resp.} left) ladder of length $l-1$ at index $i$ is said to be {\em incremented} when graph $\IG{l}{i}$ ({\it resp.} $\IG{l}{i-l+1}$) is added to it, and the resulting sequence of intersection graphs is called the {\em increment} of that ladder.
\end{definition}
\begin{lemma}
\label{lem:ladder}
A ladder of length $l$ can be computed using $l-1$ binary intersections.
\end{lemma}
\begin{proof}
Consider a right ladder $\rlad{l}{i}$. For any $k \in [2,l]$ it holds that $\IG{k}{i}=\IG{k-1}{i}\cap G_{i+k-1}$. Indeed, by definition, $\IG{k-1}{i}=\cap \{G_i, G_{i+1},..., G_{i+k-2}\}$. The ladder can thus be built bottom-up using a single new intersection at each level.
Consider a left ladder $\llad{l}{i}$. For any $k \in [2,l]$ it holds that $\IG{k}{i-k+1}=G_{i-k+1} \, \cap \, \IG{k-1}{i-k+2}$. Indeed, by definition, $\IG{k-1}{i-k+2}=\cap \{G_{i-k+2}, \allowbreak G_{i-k+3},..., G_{i}\}$. The ladder can thus be built bottom-up using a single new intersection at each level. \qed
\end{proof}
\begin{lemma}
\label{lem:intersection}
\joe{Given $\llad{l_{\ell}}{j-1}$ and $\rlad{l_r}{j}$,
any pair $(i,k)$ such that $j-l_{\ell} \le i<j$ and $j-i < k \le j-i+l_r$,
$\IG{k}{i}$ can be computed by a single binary intersection, namely $\IG{k}{i} = \IG{j-i}{i} \cap \IG{k-j+i}{j}$.}
\end{lemma}
\begin{proof}
\joe{By definition, $\IG{k}{i} = \cap \{G_i, G_{i+1},..., G_{i+k-1}\}$ and
$\IG{j-i}{i} = \cap \{G_i, G_{i+1},$ $ ..., G_{j-1}\}$ and
$\IG{k-j+i}{j} = \cap \{G_{j}, G_{j+1},..., G_{i+k-1}\}$.
It follows that $\IG{k}{i} = \IG{j-i}{i} \cap \IG{k-j+i}{j}$.
By definition, $\IG{j-i}{i} \in \llad{l_{\ell}}{j-1}$ and $\IG{k-j+i}{j} \in \rlad{l_r}{j}$, so only a single binary intersection is needed.}
\qed
\end{proof}
\noindent
\begin{tabular}{@{}c@{\quad}c}
\begin{minipage}[@{}c]{11.3cm}
\joe{Informally, the constraints $j-l_{\ell} \le i<j$ and $j-i < k \le j-i+l_r$} in Lemma~\ref{lem:intersection} define a rectangle delimited by two ladders and two lines that are parallel to the two ladders as shown in the figure to the right. The pairs $(i,k)$ defined by the constraints, shown in light grey in the figure, include all pairs that are strictly inside the rectangle, and all pairs on the parallel lines, but pairs on the two ladders are excluded.
\end{minipage}
&
\begin{minipage}[c]{3.7cm}
\xdefinecolor{bordeaux}{rgb}{0.7,0.10,0.10}
\begin{tikzpicture}[scale=.36]
\begin{scope}
\clip (5,-8.75) rectangle (10.15, -18);
\tikzstyle{every node}=[draw, circle, inner sep=2.5pt,lightgray!70]
\foreach \j in {9,...,16}{
\foreach \i in {1,...,\j}{
\pgfmathsetmacro{\ii}{\i + (16-\j)/2};
\path (\ii,-\j) node (\i\j){};
}
}
\tikzstyle{every path}=[thin,dashed,dash pattern=on 1pt off 1.5pt,lightgray!70]
\foreach \j in {9,...,15}{
\foreach \i in {1,...,\j}{
\pgfmathtruncatemacro{\jj}{\j + 1};
\pgfmathtruncatemacro{\ii}{\i + 1};
\draw (\i\jj) -- (\i\j);
\draw (\ii\jj) -- (\i\j);
}
}
\tikzstyle{every node}=[draw, circle, inner sep=2.2pt, fill=lightgray, lightgray]
\path (815) node {};
\path (814) node {};
\path (714) node {};
\path (713) node {};
\path (613) node {};
\path (612) node {};
\path (512) node {};
\path (511) node {};
\path (411) node {};
\path (410) node {};
\path (310) node {};
\path (310)+(.5,1) node {};
\tikzstyle{every node}=[draw, circle, inner sep=2.2pt, fill=gray, gray]
\draw[ultra thick,solid] (816) node {}--(715) node {}--(614) node {}--(513) node {}--(412) node {}--(311) node {};
\draw[ultra thick,solid] (916) node {}-- (915) node {};
\tikzstyle{every node}=[draw, circle, inner sep=2.5pt, fill=bordeaux]
\path (511) node {};
\end{scope}
\node () [] at (8.8,-11.0) {\large $\scriptstyle (i,k)$};
\node () [] at (4.4,-13.1) {\large $\scriptstyle (i,j-i)$};
\node () [] at (12.4,-15.0) {\large $\scriptstyle (j,k-j+i)$};
\node (next) [inner sep=1pt] at (8.3,-17) {$j$};
\draw[->,>=latex] (next) to (916);
\tikzstyle{inter}=[-,thick]
\draw[inter] (511) to[bend left=10] (513);
\draw[inter] (511) to[bend right=10] (915);
\end{tikzpicture}
\end{minipage}
\end{tabular}
\begin{figure}[b]
\centering
\begin{tikzpicture}[scale=0.33]
\begin{scope}
\node (T) [font=\Large] at (1,-12) {${\cal{G}}^T$};
\tikzstyle{every node}=[draw, inner sep=4pt, thin, darkgray]
\path (3,-12) node[circle] {};
\path (8,-12) node[circle] {};
\path (13,-12) node[circle] {};
\tikzstyle{every node}=[draw, circle, inner sep=2pt,darkgray]
\foreach \j in {9,...,16}{
\foreach \i in {1,...,\j}{
\pgfmathsetmacro{\ii}{\i + (16-\j)/2};
\path (\ii,-\j) node (\i\j){};
}
}
\draw[->] (T) to (2.5,-12);
\tikzstyle{inter}=[-]
\draw[inter] (212) to[bend left=10] (213);
\draw[inter] (212) to[bend right=10] (616);
\draw[inter] (312) to[bend left=10] (314);
\draw[inter] (312) to[bend right=10] (615);
\draw[inter] (412) to[bend left=10] (415);
\draw[inter] (412) to[bend right=10] (614);
\draw[inter] (512) to[bend left=10] (516);
\draw[inter] (512) to[bend right=10] (613);
\draw[inter] (712) to[bend left=10] (713);
\draw[inter] (712) to[bend right=10] (1116);
\draw[inter] (812) to[bend left=10] (814);
\draw[inter] (812) to[bend right=10] (1115);
\draw[inter] (912) to[bend left=10] (915);
\draw[inter] (912) to[bend right=10] (1114);
\draw[inter] (1012) to[bend left=10] (1016);
\draw[inter] (1012) to[bend right=10] (1113);
\draw[inter] (1212) to[bend left=10] (1213);
\draw[inter] (1212) to[bend right=10] (1616);
\tikzstyle{every path}=[thin,dashed,gray,dash pattern=on 1pt off 1.5pt]
\foreach \j in {9,...,15}{
\foreach \i in {1,...,\j}{
\pgfmathtruncatemacro{\jj}{\j + 1};
\pgfmathtruncatemacro{\ii}{\i + 1};
\draw (\i\jj) -- (\i\j);
\draw (\ii\jj) -- (\i\j);
}
}
\foreach \i in {1,...,12}{
\pgfmathsetmacro{\ii}{\i + 2};
\path (\ii,-12) node {};
}
\tikzstyle{every node}=[draw, circle, inner sep=2pt, fill=gray]
\draw[ultra thick, solid] (616) node {}--(615) node {}--(614) node {}--(613) node {};
\draw[ultra thick, solid] (1116) node {}-- (1115) node {}-- (1114) node {}-- (1113) node {};
\draw[ultra thick, solid] (516) node {}--(415) node {}--(314) node {}--(213) node {}--(112);
\draw[ultra thick, solid] (1016) node {}--(915) node {}--(814) node {}--(713) node {}--(612);
\draw[ultra thick, solid] (1516) node {}--(1415) node {}--(1314) node {}--(1213) node {}--(1112) ;
\draw[ultra thick, solid] (1616) node {};
\xdefinecolor{bordeaux}{rgb}{0.7,0.10,0.10}
\tikzstyle{every node}=[draw, circle, inner sep=1.9pt, fill=bordeaux]
\path (112) node {};
\path (212) node {};
\path (312) node {};
\path (412) node {};
\path (512) node {};
\path (612) node {};
\path (712) node {};
\path (812) node {};
\path (912) node {};
\path (1012) node {};
\path (1112) node {};
\path (1212) node {};
\end{scope}
\begin{scope}[xshift=17cm]
\xdefinecolor{bordeaux}{rgb}{0.7,0.10,0.10}
\node (T) [font=\Large] at (2.5,-8) {${\cal{G}}^T$};
\tikzstyle{every node}=[draw, inner sep=4pt, thin, darkgray]
\path (5,-8) node[circle] {};
\tikzstyle{every node}=[draw, circle, inner sep=2pt,darkgray]
\foreach \j in {7,...,16}{
\foreach \i in {1,...,\j}{
\pgfmathsetmacro{\ii}{\i + (16-\j)/2};
\path (\ii,-\j) node (\i\j){};
}
}
\draw[->] (T) to (4.5,-8);
\tikzstyle{inter}=[-]
\draw[inter] (28) to[bend left=10] (29);
\draw[inter] (28) to[bend right=10] (1016);
\draw[inter] (38) to[bend left=10] (310);
\draw[inter] (38) to[bend right=10] (1015);
\draw[inter] (48) to[bend left=10] (411);
\draw[inter] (48) to[bend right=10] (1014);
\draw[inter] (58) to[bend left=10] (512);
\draw[inter] (58) to[bend right=10] (1013);
\draw[inter] (68) to[bend left=10] (613);
\draw[inter] (68) to[bend right=10] (1012);
\draw[inter] (78) to[bend left=10] (714);
\draw[inter] (78) to[bend right=10] (1011);
\draw[inter] (88) to[bend left=10] (815);
\draw[inter] (88) to[bend right=10] (1010);
\tikzstyle{every path}=[thin,dashed,gray,dash pattern=on 1pt off 1.5pt]
\foreach \j in {7,...,15}{
\foreach \i in {1,...,\j}{
\pgfmathtruncatemacro{\jj}{\j + 1};
\pgfmathtruncatemacro{\ii}{\i + 1};
\draw (\i\jj) -- (\i\j);
\draw (\ii\jj) -- (\i\j);
}
}
\foreach \i in {1,...,7}{
\pgfmathsetmacro{\ii}{\i + 4.5};
\path (\ii,-7) node {};
}
\tikzstyle{every node}=[draw, circle, inner sep=2pt, fill=gray]
\draw[ultra thick, solid] (1016) node {}--(1015) node {}--(1014) node {}--(1013) node {}--(1012) node {}--(1011) node {}--(1010) node {};
\draw[ultra thick, solid] (916) node {}-- (815) node {}-- (714) node {}-- (613) node {}-- (512) node {}-- (411) node {}-- (310) node {}-- (29) node {}-- (18);
\tikzstyle{every node}=[draw, circle, inner sep=1.9pt, fill=bordeaux]
\path (18) node {};
\path (28) node {};
\path (38) node {};
\path (48) node {};
\path (58) node {};
\path (68) node {};
\path (78) node {};
\path (88) node {};
\end{scope}
\end{tikzpicture}
\caption{\label{fig:optimal-T}Examples of the execution of
the optimal algorithm for {\scshape $T$-Interval-Connectivity}\xspace with $T < \delta/2$ (left) and $T \geq \delta/2$ (right). ${\cal{G}}$ is $T$-interval connected in both examples.}
\end{figure}
\bigskip
\boldpara{\boldmath $T$-{\scshape Interval-Connectivity}\xspace.}
We describe our optimal algorithm for this problem with reference to Fig.~\ref{fig:optimal-T} below which shows two examples of the execution of the algorithm (see Algorithm~\ref{algo:optimal-T} for details).
The algorithm traverses the $T^{th}$ row in the intersection hierarchy from left to right, starting at $\IG{T}{1}$. If a disconnected graph is found, the algorithm returns {\tt false} and terminates. If the algorithm reaches the last graph in the row, i.e. $\IG{T}{\delta-T+1}$, and no disconnected graph was found, then it returns {\tt true}.
The graphs $\IG{T}{1}, \IG{T}{2}, \ldots, \IG{T}{\delta-T+1}$ are computed based on the set of ladders
$\mathcal{S} = \{\llad{T}{T},$ $ \rlad{T-1}{T+1}, \llad{T}{2T}$, $\rlad{T-1}{2T+1}, \ldots\}$, which are constructed as follows.
Each left ladder is built entirely (from bottom to top)
when the traversal arrives at its top location in row $T$ (i.e. where the last increment is to take place). For instance, $\llad{T}{T}$ is built when the walk is at index $1$ in row $T$, $\llad{T}{2T}$ is built at index $T+1$, and so on. If a disconnected graph is found in the process, the execution terminates returning {\tt false}.
\begin{algorithm}[h]
\footnotesize
$k \leftarrow T$ \hfill // current row (non-changing) \\
$i \leftarrow 1$ \hfill // current index in the row \\
$next \leftarrow 1$ \hfill // trigger for next ladder construction \\
\BlankLine
// walk until stepping out of the intersection hierarchy \\
\While{$i \leq \delta-k+1$}{
\eIf{$i=next$}{$next\gets i+k$\\ \If{$\neg$\texttt{computeFromRight($k,i,next$)}}{\tt return false}}{
\texttt{computeFromIntersection($k,i,next$)}\\
}
\If{$\neg $\texttt{isConnected($\IG{k}{i}$)}}{\texttt{return false}}
$i \leftarrow i+1$\\
}
\texttt{return true}
\BlankLine
\hrule\medskip
\SetKwBlock{Begin}{}{}
function \texttt{computeFromRight($k,i,next$):} \hfill // compute the left ladder ${\cal L}^k[i]$
\Begin{
$k'\gets 1$ \hfill // row of first increment\\
$i'\gets next-1$ \hfill // index of first increment\\
\While{$k'<k$}{
\If{$\neg${\tt isConnected}($\IG{k'}{i'}$)}{
{\tt return false} \hfill // a disconnected graph was found
}
$k' \gets k' + 1$\\
$i' \gets i' - 1$\\
${\cal{G}}^{k'}[i'] \gets {\cal{G}}^{k'-1}[i'+1] \cap G_{i'}$ \hfill// ``increment'' the ladder\\
}
}
\BlankLine
\hrule\medskip
function \texttt{computeFromIntersection($k,i,next$):} \hfill // ``increment'' the right ladder
\Begin{
$k' \gets k-next+i$ \hfill // row of increment (right ladder) \\
$\IG{k'}{next} \gets \IG{k'-1}{next} \cap G_{next+k'-1}$ \hfill // ``increment'' right ladder\\
$\IG{k}{i} \gets \IG{next-i}{i} \cap \IG{k'}{next}$ \hfill // compute intersection based on Lemma~\ref{lem:intersection}\\
}
\caption{\label{algo:optimal-T} Optimal algorithm for {\scshape $T$-Interval-Connectivity}\xspace}
\label{algo1}
\end{algorithm}
\FloatBarrier
Differently from left ladders, right ladders are constructed gradually as the traversal proceeds. Each time that the traversal moves right to a new index in the $T^{th}$ row, the current right ladder is incremented and the new top element of this right ladder is used immediately to compute the graph at the current index in the $T^{th}$ row (using Lemma~\ref{lem:intersection}). This continues until the right ladder reaches row $T-1$ after which a new left ladder is built.
The set $\mathcal{S}$ of ladders constructed by this process
\joe{includes at most $\lfloor\delta/T\rfloor$ left ladders and $\lfloor\delta/T\rfloor$ right ladders,} each of length at most $T$. By Lemma~\ref{lem:ladder}, the set of ladders $\mathcal{S}$ can be computed using less than $2\delta$ binary intersections. Based on Lemma~\ref{lem:intersection}, each of the $\delta-T+1$ graphs $\IG{T}{i}$ in row $T$ can be computed at the cost of a single intersection of two graphs in $\mathcal{S}$. At most $\delta-T+1$ connectivity tests are performed for row $T$. This establishes the following result which matches the lower bound of Lemma~\ref{lem:lower-bound}.
\begin{theorem}\label{thm:T-inter-opt}
{\scshape $T$-Interval-Connectivity}\xspace can be solved with $\Theta(\delta)$ elementary operations, which is optimal (to within a constant factor).
\end{theorem}
\boldpara{{\scshape Interval-Connectivity}\xspace.}
The strategy of our optimal algorithm for this problem is in the same spirit as the one for {\scshape $T$-Interval-Connectivity}\xspace. However, it is more complex and corresponds to a walk in the two dimensions of the intersection hierarchy. It is best understood with reference to Fig.~\ref{fig:walk} which shows an example of the execution of the algorithm (see Algorithm~\ref{algo:optimal_interval} for details).
\begin{figure}[h]
\centering
\xdefinecolor{bordeaux}{rgb}{0.7,0.10,0.10}
\begin{tikzpicture}[scale=.44]
\tikzstyle{direction}=[->,thick,dashed]
\node (l1) [] at (0,-16.2) {};
\node (l8) [] at (4,-9) {};
\draw[direction] (l1) to[] (3.15,-9.8);
\tikzstyle{every node}=[draw, circle, inner sep=2.5pt,gray]
\foreach \j in {9,...,16}{
\foreach \i in {1,...,\j}{
\pgfmathsetmacro{\ii}{\i + (16-\j)/2};
\path (\ii,-\j) node (\i\j){};
}
}
\tikzstyle{every path}=[thin,dashed,gray,dash pattern=on 1pt off 1.5pt]
\foreach \j in {9,...,15}{
\foreach \i in {1,...,\j}{
\pgfmathtruncatemacro{\jj}{\j + 1};
\pgfmathtruncatemacro{\ii}{\i + 1};
\draw (\i\jj) -- (\i\j);
\draw (\ii\jj) -- (\i\j);
}
}
\tikzstyle{every node}=[font=\LARGE, red]
\path (19) node {$\times$};
\path (510) node {$\times$};
\path (711) node {$\times$};
\path (1012) node {$\times$};
\path (1113) node {$\times$};
\tikzstyle{every node}=[draw, circle, inner sep=2.3pt, fill=gray]
\draw[ultra thick, solid] (816) node {}--(715) node {}--(614) node {}--(513) node {}--(412) node {}--(311) node {}--(210) node {};
\draw[ultra thick, solid] (916) node {}-- (915) node {}-- (914) node {}-- (913) node {};
\draw[ultra thick, solid] (1316) node {}--(1215) node {}-- (1114) node {}--(1013) node {}-- (912) node {};
\draw[ultra thick, solid] (1416) node {}-- (1415) node {};
\draw[ultra thick, solid] (1414) node {}--(1515) node {}-- (1616) node {};
\path (1616) node {};
\tikzstyle{every path}=[]
\tikzstyle{every node}=[draw, inner sep=5pt, thin, darkgray]
\path (210) node[circle] {};
\path (912) node[circle] {};
\path (1414) node[circle] {};
\tikzstyle{every node}=[draw, circle, inner sep=2.5pt, fill=bordeaux]
\path (116) node {};
\path (115) node {};
\path (114) node {};
\path (113) node {};
\path (112) node {};
\path (111) node {};
\path (110) node {};
\path (210) node {};
\path (310) node {};
\path (410) node {};
\path (611) node {};
\path (812) node {};
\path (912) node {};
\path (1214) node {};
\path (1314) node {};
\path (1414) node {};
\tikzstyle{every path}=[very thick,rounded corners=6pt]
\draw (116)--(115)--(114)--(113)--(112)--(111)--(110)--(19);
\draw (19)--(110.north east)--(210)--(310);
\draw (310)--(410)--(510)--(511.north east)--(611);
\draw (611)--(711)--(712.north east)--(812);
\draw (812)--(912)--(1012)--(1013.north east)--(1113);
\draw (1113)--(1114.north east)--(1214);
\draw (1214)--(1314)--(1414);
\end{tikzpicture}
\caption{\label{fig:walk}Example of the execution of
the optimal algorithm for {\scshape Interval-Connectivity}\xspace. {\it (It is a coincidence that the rightmost ladder matches the outer face.)}}
\end{figure}
\begin{algorithm}
\footnotesize
$k \leftarrow 1$ \hfill // current row\\
$i \leftarrow 1$ \hfill // current index in the row\\
$next \leftarrow 2$ \hfill // trigger for next ladder construction\medskip\\
// builds a right ladder until a disconnected graph is found\\
\While{ \texttt{isConnected($\IG{k}{1}$)} }{
$k\gets k+1$\\
\eIf{$k > \delta$}{
{\tt return} $\delta$ \hfill // the graph is $\delta$-interval connected
}{
$\IG{k}{1} \leftarrow \IG{k-1}{1} \cap G_{k}$ \hfill // ``increment'' the right ladder
}
}
\If{$k=1$}{{\tt return} $0$ \hfill // the graph is $0$-interval connected}\medskip
$k\gets k-1$ \hfill // move down\\
$i\gets i+1$ \hfill // move right\\
\BlankLine
\BlankLine
// walk until stepping out of the hierarchy\\
\While{$i \leq \delta-k+1$}{
\eIf{$i=next$}{
$next \gets i+k$\\
{\tt computeFromRight($k,i,next$)}\\
}{
{\tt computeFromIntersection($k,i,next$)}\\
\If {$\neg$\texttt{isConnected($\IG{k}{i}$)}}{
$k\gets k-1$\\
}
}
\If {$k=0$}{
{\tt return 0}
}
$i\gets i+1$\\
}
\texttt{return} $k$
\hrule\medskip
\SetKwBlock{Begin}{}{}
function \texttt{computeFromRight($k,i,next$):} \hfill // compute the left ladder ${\cal L}^k[i]$
\Begin{
$k'\gets 1$ \hfill // row of first increment\\
$i'\gets next-1$ \hfill // index of first increment\\
\While{$k'<k$}{
\If{$\neg${\tt isConnected}($\IG{k'}{i'}$)}{
$k \gets k'-1$ \hfill // move the original walk..\\
$i \gets i'+1$ \hfill // ..below-right disconnected graph,\\
{\tt return} \hfill // abort function
}
$k' \gets k' + 1$\\
$i' \gets i' - 1$\\
${\cal{G}}^{k'}[i'] \gets {\cal{G}}^{k'-1}[i'+1] \cap G_{i'}$ \hfill // ``increment'' the ladder
}
}
\hrule\medskip
\SetKwBlock{Begin}{}{}
function \texttt{computeFromIntersection($k,i,next$):} \hfill (Same function as for Algorithm~\ref{algo:optimal-T}
\Begin{
$k' \gets k-next+i$ \hfill // row of increment (right ladder)\\
$\IG{k'}{next} \gets \IG{k'-1}{next} \cap G_{next+k'-1}$ \hfill // ``increment'' right ladder\\
$\IG{k}{i} \gets \IG{next-i}{i} \cap \IG{k'}{next}$ \hfill // compute intersection based on Lemma~\ref{lem:intersection}
}
\caption{\label{algo:optimal_interval} Optimal algorithm for {\scshape Interval-Connectivity}\xspace}
\end{algorithm}
The walk starts at the bottom left graph $\IG{1}{1}$ and builds a right ladder incrementally until it encounters a disconnected graph. If $\IG{\delta}{1}$ is reached and is connected, then ${\cal{G}}$ is $\delta$-interval connected and execution terminates returning $\delta$. Otherwise, suppose that a disconnected graph is first found in row $k+1$. Then $k$ is an upper bound on the connectivity of ${\cal{G}}$ and the walk drops down a level to $\IG{k}{2}$ which is the next graph in row $k$ that needs to be checked. This requires the construction of a left ladder $\llad{k}{k+1}$ of length $k$ ending at $\IG{k}{2}$. The walk proceeds rightward on row $k$ using a similar traversal strategy to
the algorithm for {\scshape $T$-Interval-Connectivity}\xspace. Here, however, every time that a disconnected graph is found, the walk drops down by one row. The dropping down operation, say, from some $\IG{k}{i}$, is made in two steps \joe{(curved line in Fig.~\ref{fig:walk}). First it goes to $\IG{k-1}{i}$, which is necessarily connected because $\IG{k}{i-1}$ is connected (so a connectivity test is not needed here),} and then it moves one unit right to $\IG{k-1}{i+1}$. If the walk eventually reaches the rightmost graph of some row and this graph is connected, then the algorithm terminates returning the corresponding row number as $T$. Otherwise the walk will terminate at a disconnected graph in row 1 and ${\cal{G}}$ is not $T$-interval connected for any $T$. In this case, the algorithm returns $T=0$.
Similarly to the algorithm for {\scshape $T$-Interval-Connectivity}\xspace,
the computations of the graphs in a walk by Algorithm~\ref{algo:optimal_interval} (for {\scshape Interval-Connectivity}\xspace)
use binary intersections based on Lemmas~\ref{lem:ladder} and~\ref{lem:intersection}. If the algorithm returns that ${\cal{G}}$ is $T$-interval connected, then each graph $\IG{T}{1}, \IG{T}{2}, \ldots, \IG{T}{\delta-T+1}$ must be connected. The graphs that are on the walk are checked directly by the algorithm. For each graph $\IG{T}{i}$ on row $T$ that is below the walk, there is a graph
$\IG{j}{i}$ with $j>T$
that is on the walk and is connected and this implies that $\IG{T}{i}$ is connected.
The ranges of the indices covered by the left ladders that are constructed by this process are disjoint, so their total length is O($\delta$). The first right ladder has length at most $\delta$ and each subsequent right ladder has length less than the left ladder that precedes it so the total length of the right ladders is also O($\delta$). Therefore,
this algorithm performs at most O($\delta$) binary intersections and O($\delta$) connectivity tests. This establishes the following result which matches the lower bound of Lemma~\ref{lem:lower-bound}.
\begin{theorem}\label{thm:inter-opt}
{\scshape Interval-Connectivity}\xspace can be solved with $\Theta(\delta)$ elementary operations, which is optimal (up to a constant factor).
\end{theorem}
\FloatBarrier
\boldpara{Online Algorithms.}
The optimal algorithms for {\scshape $T$-Interval-Connectivity}\xspace and\linebreak
{\scshape Interval-Connectivity}\xspace can be adapted to an online setting in which the sequence of graphs $G_1,G_2,G_3,\ldots$ of a dynamic graph ${\cal{G}}$ is processed in the order that the graphs are received. In the case of {\scshape $T$-Interval-Connectivity}\xspace, the algorithm cannot provide an answer until at least $T$ graphs have been received. When the $T^{th}$ graph is received, the algorithm builds the first left ladder using $T-1$ binary intersections. It can then perform a connectivity test and answer whether or not the sequence is $T$-interval connected so far. After this initial period, a $T$-connectivity test can be performed for the $T$ most recently received graphs \joe{(by performing a connectivity test on the corresponding graph in row $T$)} after the receipt of each new graph. At no time does the number of intersections performed to build left ladders exceed the number of graphs received and the same is true for right ladders. Furthermore, each new graph after the first $T-1$ corresponds to a graph in row $T$ which can be computed with one intersection by Lemma~\ref{lem:intersection}. In summary, the amortized cost is $O(1)$ elementary operations for each graph received and for each $T$-connectivity test after the initial period. The analysis for {\scshape Interval-Connectivity}\xspace is similar except the algorithm can report the connectedness of the sequence so far starting with the first graph received.
\begin{theorem}\label{thm:online}
{\scshape $T$-Interval-Connectivity}\xspace and {\scshape Interval-Connectivity}\xspace can be solved online with \joe{an amortized cost of} $\Theta(1)$ elementary operations per graph received.
\end{theorem}
\section{Dynamic Online Interval Connectivity}
\label{sec:dynamic}
The algorithms in this section are motivated by Internet protocols like TCP (Transmission Control Protocol) which
adjust their behaviour dynamically in response to recent network events and conditions such as dropped packets and congestion. $T$-interval connectivity is a measure of the stability of a network. Generally, larger values of $T$ indicate that communication is more reliable, so it is natural to consider a dynamic version of interval connectivity that is based only on the recent states of a network rather than the entire history of a network.
We formalize this notion of recent history by introducing the concept of {\em $T$-stable} graphs. We then define the dynamic online versions of both {\scshape $T$-Interval-Connectivity}\xspace and {\scshape Interval-Connectivity}\xspace in terms of $T$-stable graphs.
\begin{definition}[\boldmath $T$-stable graph]
A graph $G_i$, $i\geq T$, of a sequence ${\cal{G}}=(G_1,G_2,...,G_\delta)$ is {\em $T$-stable} for a given $T$ iff the subsequence $ G_{i-(T-1)}, G_{i-(T-2)}, \ldots , G_{i-1}, G_i$ is $T$-interval connected.
\end{definition}
\begin{definition}[Testing \boldmath {\scshape $T$-Stability}\xspace]
The {\scshape $T$-Stability}\xspace problem for a given $T$ is the problem of deciding for each received graph $G_i$, $i \geq T$, whether $G_i$ is $T$-stable.
\end{definition}
\begin{definition}[Testing \boldmath {\scshape Stability}\xspace]
We use the term {\scshape Stability}\xspace to refer to the problem of finding $T_i =\max\{T :$ $G_i$ is $T$-stable$\}$ for each received graph $G_i$.
\end{definition}
As before, the first problem is a decision problem with true/false output, while the second is a maximization problem with integer output. Here, however, one such output is required after each graph in the sequence is received.
\medskip
\boldpara{\boldmath {\scshape $T$-Stability}\xspace.} Our algorithm for {\scshape $T$-Stability}\xspace is similar to Algorithm~\ref{algo:optimal-T} for {\scshape $T$-Interval-Connectivity}\xspace. The differences are that the algorithm for {\scshape $T$-Stability}\xspace produces an output after each graph of a sequence is received, and the algorithm does not terminate if a disconnected graph is found on row $T$ of the hierarchy. Instead, it continues until the last graph in the sequence is received. The ladders constructed by the algorithm for {\scshape $T$-Stability}\xspace are the same as the ladders that would be constructed by Algorithm~\ref{algo:optimal-T} for a dynamic graph that is $T$-interval connected (see Figure~\ref{fig:optimal-T} for examples). Given a dynamic graph ${\cal{G}}=(G_1,G_2,...,G_\delta)$, {\scshape $T$-Stability}\xspace is undefined for the graphs $G_i$ with $i<T$, so the algorithm returns $\bot$ after each of the first $T-1$ graphs is received. When $G_T$ is received, the algorithm builds a left ladder and returns {\tt true} (resp. {\tt false}) if the top graph of the ladder (i.e. ${\cal{G}}^T[1]$) is connected (resp. disconnected). Then the walk progresses rightward along row $T$ every time that a graph is received, alternately building left and right ladders in such a way that the graph ${\cal{G}}^T[i-(T-1)]$ can always be computed from $G_i$ with a single intersection (using Lemma~\ref{lem:intersection}). $G_i$ is $T$-stable iff ${\cal{G}}^T[i-(T-1)]$ is connected and {\tt true} or {\tt false} is output as appropriate. By the same analysis as the analysis for the online version of Algorithm~\ref{algo:optimal-T}, the number of intersections performed to build left ladders never exceeds the number of graphs received, and the same is true for the number of intersections to build right ladders and the number of connectivity tests.
\begin{theorem}\label{thm:tstable}
{\scshape $T$-Stability}\xspace can be solved online with an amortized cost of $\Theta(1)$ elementary operations per graph received.
\end{theorem}
\medskip
\boldpara{\boldmath {\scshape Stability}\xspace.} The algorithm for this problem must find $T_i=\max\{T :$ $G_i$ is $T$-stable$\}$ for each received graph $G_i$.
Our algorithm for {\scshape Stability}\xspace generalizes the strategy that we used in the algorithm for {\scshape Interval-Connectivity}\xspace by trying to climb as high as possible in the hierarchy, even after a disconnected intersection graph is found. This is necessary because the sequence of values $T_1,T_{2},T_{3},\ldots$ for {\scshape Stability}\xspace is not necessarily monotonic.
The algorithm for {\scshape Stability}\xspace uses right and left ladders
to walk through the intersection hierarchy. The general idea is that the walk goes up when the current intersection graph is connected and down when it is disconnected (unless the walk is on the bottom level of the hierarchy in which case it goes right to the next graph). This is different from the algorithm for {\scshape Interval-Connectivity}\xspace which only goes up during the construction of the first right ladder and goes right or down in all other cases. We will describe the algorithm for {\scshape Stability}\xspace with reference to Fig.~\ref{fig:window_walk} which shows an example of the execution of the algorithm. See Algorithm~\ref{algo:optimal_interval_window} for complete details.
\begin{figure}
\centering
\xdefinecolor{bordeaux}{rgb}{0.7,0.10,0.10}
\begin{tikzpicture}[scale=.44]
\draw[->,thick] (14.7,-16.9) to[] (14.2,-16.4);
\draw[->,thick] (14.5,-11) to[] (14.0,-11);
\node (T) [font=\footnotesize] at (17,-17.2) {$current$ $graph$ $G_{14}$};
\node (T) [font=\small] at (15.2,-11) {$T_{14}$};
\tikzstyle{direction}=[->,thick,dashed]
\node (l1) [] at (0,-16.2) {};
\node (l8) [] at (4,-9) {};
\draw[direction] (l1) to[] (3.15,-9.8);
\tikzstyle{every node}=[draw, circle, inner sep=2.5pt,gray]
\foreach \j in {9,...,16}{
\foreach \i in {1,...,\j}{
\pgfmathsetmacro{\ii}{\i + (16-\j)/2};
\path (\ii,-\j) node (\i\j){};
}
}
\tikzstyle{every path}=[thin,dashed,gray,dash pattern=on 1pt off 1.5pt]
\foreach \j in {9,...,15}{
\foreach \i in {1,...,\j}{
\pgfmathtruncatemacro{\jj}{\j + 1};
\pgfmathtruncatemacro{\ii}{\i + 1};
\draw (\i\jj) -- (\i\j);
\draw (\ii\jj) -- (\i\j);
}
}
\tikzstyle{every node}=[draw, circle, inner sep=2.3pt, fill=gray]
\draw[ultra thick, solid] (616) node {}--(515) node {}--(414) node {}--(313) node {}--(212) node {};
\draw[ultra thick, solid] (716) node {}-- (715) node {}-- (714) node {}-- (713) node {}-- (712) node {};
\draw[ultra thick, solid] (1116) node {}--(1015) node {}--(914) node {} --(813) node {};
\draw[ultra thick, solid] (1216) node {}--(1215) node {}--(1214) node {};
\tikzstyle{every node}=[font=\LARGE, red]
\path (29) node {$\times$};
\path (111) node {$\times$};
\path (310) node {$\times$};
\path (411) node {$\times$};
\path (712) node {$\times$};
\path (813) node {$\times$};
\tikzstyle{every path}=[]
\tikzstyle{every node}=[draw, inner sep=5pt, thin, darkgray]
\path (212) node[circle] {};
\path (813) node[circle] {};
\tikzstyle{every node}=[draw, circle, inner sep=2.5pt, fill=bordeaux]
\path (116) node {};
\path (115) node {};
\path (114) node {};
\path (113) node {};
\path (112) node {};
\path (212) node {};
\path (211) node {};
\path (210) node {};
\path (512) node {};
\path (511) node {};
\path (914) node {};
\path (913) node {};
\path (912) node {};
\path (911) node {};
\tikzstyle{every path}=[very thick,rounded corners=6pt]
\draw (116)--(115)--(114)--(113)--(112)--(111)--(112.north east)--(212)--(211)--(210)--(29)--(210.north east)--(310)--(311.north east)--(411)--(412.north east)--(512)--(511);
\draw (712)--(713.north east)--(813)--(814.north east)--(914)--(913)--(912)--(911);
\end{tikzpicture}
\caption{\label{fig:window_walk}Example of the execution of the {\scshape Stability}\xspace algorithm.}
\end{figure}
The walk begins by constructing a right ladder. In each step, if a computed intersection graph $\IG{k}{j}$ is connected, and $G_i$, $i=j+k-1$, is the most recently received graph, then the value $k$ is returned to indicate that $G_{i}$ is $k$-stable. Then the walk climbs one row in the hierarchy to $\IG{k+1}{j}$ which takes into consideration the next graph $G_{i+1}$. If a computed intersection graph $\IG{k}{j}$, $k > 1$, is disconnected, then the walk descends to the next graph in the row below, i.e. to $\IG{k-1}{j+1}$. In this case no value is returned because the next graph in ${\cal{G}}$ has not yet been considered. If a graph $\IG{1}{j}$ is disconnected, then $0$ is returned, and the walk moves right to the next graph.
As in the previous algorithms, the right ladders are constructed incrementally as the walk goes up, even though each graph $\IG{k}{j}$ can be computed from $\IG{k-1}{j} \cap G_{j+k-1}$, because this prepares the ladders needed to compute the intersection graphs if the walk goes down. This is illustrated by the second right ladder $\rlad{5}{7}$ in Fig.~\ref{fig:window_walk}. If a disconnected graph $\IG{k}{j}$ is found while building a right ladder, the walk jumps to the next graph in the row just below, i.e. to $\IG{k-1}{j+1}$, to avoid unnecessary computations. For example, in Fig.~\ref{fig:window_walk} the walk jumps from $\IG{5}{7}$ which is disconnected to $\IG{4}{8}$ without computing $\IG{7}{5}$ and $\IG{6}{6}$.
If a graph $\IG{k}{j}$ cannot be computed using the current ladders, then a complete new left ladder $\llad{k}{k+j-1}$ is constructed as high as possible until it reaches a previously computed graph or until it encounters a disconnected graph. The former case is illustrated by the left ladder $\llad{5}{6}$ in Fig.~\ref{fig:window_walk} which is built when the walk descends from $\IG{6}{1}$ to $\IG{5}{2}$. The latter case is illustrated by the left ladder $\llad{4}{11}$ which encounters the disconnected graph $\IG{4}{8}$. In this case the walk resumes from the previous graph in the ladder ($\IG{3}{9}$ in the example). In contrast, a new left ladder is not needed when the walk descends three times from $\IG{8}{2}$ to $\IG{5}{5}$ because the ladders $\llad{5}{6}$ and $\rlad{3}{7}$ that exist at this point can be used to compute these intersections.
In the example in Fig.~\ref{fig:window_walk}, the sequence of values $T_1,T_2,T_3,\ldots,T_{14}$ that the algorithm outputs is $1,2,3,4,5,5,6,7,5,6,3,4,5,6$.
\begin{algorithm}
\footnotesize
$i \leftarrow 1$ \hfill // current index in the row\\
$next \leftarrow 2$ \hfill // trigger for next ladder construction\\
$output \leftarrow 0$ \medskip\\
\BlankLine
\BlankLine
\While{receiving graphs}{
\While{ \texttt{isConnected($\IG{k}{i}$)} }{
$output \gets k$;
$k\gets k+1$\\
{\tt computeFromIntersection($k,i,next$)} \hfill // ``increment'' the right ladder\\
}
\While{ \texttt{$\neg$isConnected($\IG{k}{i}$)} }{
\eIf{$k=1$}{$output \gets 0$; $next \gets i+2$}{$k \gets k-1$\\}
$i\gets i+1$\\
\eIf{$i=next$}{
$next \gets i+k$;
{\tt computeFromRight($k,i,next$)}\\
}{
{\tt computeFromIntersection($k,i,next$)}\\
}
}
}
\hrule\medskip
\SetKwBlock{Begin}{}{}
function \texttt{computeFromRight($k,i,next$):} \hfill // compute the left ladder ${\cal L}^k[i]$
\Begin{
$k'\gets 1$ \hfill // row of first increment\\
$i'\gets next-1$ \hfill // index of first increment\\
\While{$k'<k$}{
\If{$\neg${\tt isConnected}($\IG{k'}{i'}$)}{
$k \gets k'-1$ \hfill // move the original walk..\\
$i \gets i'+1$ \hfill // ..below-right disconnected graph,\\
{\tt return} \hfill // abort function
}
$k' \gets k' + 1$;
$i' \gets i' - 1$\\
${\cal{G}}^{k'}[i'] \gets {\cal{G}}^{k'-1}[i'+1] \cap G_{i'}$ \hfill // ``increment'' the ladder
}
}
\hrule\medskip
\SetKwBlock{Begin}{}{}
function \texttt{computeFromIntersection($k,i,next$):}
\Begin{
\eIf{$i=next-1$}{$\IG{k}{i} \leftarrow \IG{k-1}{i} \cap G_{i+k-1}$}{
$k' \gets k-next+i$ \hfill // row of increment (right ladder)\\
$\IG{k'}{next} \gets \IG{k'-1}{next} \cap G_{next+k'-1}$ \hfill // ``increment'' right ladder\\
\eIf{$\neg${\tt isConnected}($\IG{k'}{next}$)}{$i \gets next$; $k \gets k'$}{
$\IG{k}{i} \gets \IG{next-i}{i} \cap \IG{k'}{next}$ \hfill // compute intersection based on Lemma~\ref{lem:intersection}}
}
}
\caption{\label{algo:optimal_interval_window} Optimal algorithm for {\scshape Stability}\xspace}
\end{algorithm}
The complexity analysis of the algorithm is similar to the analysis of the online algorithm for {\scshape Interval-Connectivity}\xspace.
The number of intersection graphs in right ladders never exceeds the number of graphs received and the same is true for left ladders. Each intersection graph in a ladder is computed using one binary intersection operation. Each time the walk climbs in the intersection hierarchy, one connectivity test is performed and a single graph is processed. When the walk descends, a new graph in ${\cal{G}}$ is not processed, but the number of descents cannot exceed the number of ascents, and each descent uses at most one connectivity test. This results in a constant amortized cost for each received graph.
\begin{theorem}\label{thm:stable}
{\scshape Stability}\xspace can be solved with an amortized cost of $\Theta(1)$ elementary operations per graph received.
\end{theorem}
\section{Conclusions}
In this paper, we studied the problem of testing whether a given dynamic graph ${\cal{G}}=(G_1,G_2,...,G_{\delta})$ is $T$-interval connected.
We also considered the related problem of finding the largest $T$ for which a given ${\cal{G}}$ is $T$-interval connected.
We assumed that the dynamic graph ${\cal{G}}$ is a sequence of {\em independent} graphs and we investigated algorithmic solutions that use two elementary operations, {\em binary intersection} and {\em connectivity testing}, to solve the problems. We developed efficient algorithms that use only $O(\delta)$ elementary operations, asymptotically matching the lower bound of $\Omega(\delta)$. We presented PRAM algorithms that show that both problems can be solved efficiently in parallel, and online algorithms that use $\Theta(1)$ elementary operations per graph received. We also presented dynamic versions of the online algorithms that report connectivity based on recent network history.
In our study, we focused on algorithms using only the two elementary
operations {\em binary intersection} and {\em connectivity testing}.
This approach is suitable for a high-level study of these problems
when the details of changes between successive graphs in a sequence
are arbitrary.
If the evolution of the dynamic graph is constrained in some
ways (e.g., bounded number of changes between graphs), then one
could benefit from the use of more sophisticated data structures to
lower the complexity of the problem. Another natural extension of our
investigation of $T$-interval connectivity would be a similar study for
other classes of dynamic graphs, as identified in \cite{CFQS12}.
\joe{Distributed algorithms for all of these problems, in which a node in the
graph only sees its local neighbourhood, would also be of interest. For example, distributed versions of the dynamic algorithms in Section~\ref{sec:dynamic} could be used to supplement the information available to distributed Internet routing protocols such as OSPF (Open-Shortest Path First) which are used to construct routing tables. Our dynamic algorithms have $\Theta(1)$ amortized complexity, and distributed versions with $\Theta(1)$ amortized complexity could provide real-time information about network connectivity to OSPF.}
\newpage
\bibliographystyle{abbrvnat}
|
\section{Introduction}
\label{sec:intro}
{\color{black}
Dynamic texture and dynamic scene classification are two fundamental problems in understanding natural video content and have gained considerable research attention~\cite{xu2011dynamic, peteri2010dyntex, doretto2003dynamic, zhao2007dynamic, derpanis2012spacetime, derpanis2010dynamic, ravichandran2013categorizing, chaudhry2013dynamic, theriault2013dynamic, feichtenhoferbags, derpanis2012dynamic, memiseviclearning, feichtenhofer2013spacetime, shroff2010moving}. Roughly, dynamic textures can be described as visual processes, which consist of a group of particles with random motions; dynamic scenes can be considered as places where events occur. In Fig.~\ref{fig:sample-img-spatial-effectiveness}, we show some sample images from a dynamic scene data set YUPENN \cite{derpanis2012dynamic}. The ability to automatically categories dynamic textures or scenes is useful, since it can be used to recognize the presence of events, surfaces, actions, and phenomena in a video surveillance system.
However automatically categorizing dynamic textures or dynamic scenes is a challenging problem, since the existence of a wide range of naturally occurring variations in a short video, e.g., illumination variations, viewpoint changes, or even significant camera motions.
It is commonly accepted that constructing a robust and effective representation of a video sequence is a crucial step towards solving these problems. In the past decade, a large number of methods for video representation have been proposed, e.g., Linear Dynamic System (LDS) based methods~\cite{doretto2003dynamic, ravichandran2013categorizing, afsari2012group, chaudhry2013dynamic}, GIST based method~\cite{oliva2001modeling}, Local Binary Pattern (LBP) based methods~\cite{ojala2002multiresolution, zhao2007dynamic, pietikainen2011computer, qi2012pairwise, rahtu2012local}, and Wavelet based methods~\cite{derpanis2010dynamic, feichtenhoferbags, ji2013wavelet, xu2011dynamic}. Unfortunately, the existing approaches suffer from the sensitivity to either varying illumination, or viewpoint changing, or even the camera motion, and/or the lack of spatial information.}
Recently there is a surge of research interests in developing \textit{deep structures} for solving real world applications. Deep structure based approaches set up numerous recognition records in image classification~\cite{azizpour2014generic, sharif2014cnn}, object detection~\cite{sermanet2013overfeat}, face recognition and verification~\cite{Sun_2014_CVPR, sun2014deep}, speech recognition~\cite{deng2013recent}, and natural language processing~\cite{collobert2008unified, collobert2011natural}.
{\color{black} Inspired by the great success of deep structures in image classification, in this paper, we attempt to leverage a deep structure to extract feature for dynamic texture and scene classification. However, learning a deep structure needs huge amount of train data and is quite expensive in computational demand. Unfortunately, as in other video classification tasks, the dynamic textures and scenes classification tasks suffer from the small size of training data. As a result, the lack of training data is actually an obstacle to deploy a deep structure for video classification tasks.
By noticing of that there are a lots of work in learning deep structures for classifying images, in this paper, we attempt to transfer the knowledge in image domain to compensate the deficiency of training data in training a deep structure to represent dynamic textures and scenes.
Concretely,
we propose to apply a well-trained Convolutional Neural Network (ConvNet) as a mid-level feature extractor to extract features from each frame in a video, and then form a representation of a video by concatenating the first and the second order statistics over the mid-level features.
We term this two-level feature extraction scheme as a Transferred ConvNet Feature (TCoF).
Our aim in this paper is to explore a robust and effective way to capture the spatial and temporal information in dynamic textures and scenes.
To be specific, our contributions are highlighted as follows:
\begin{itemize}
\item
We propose a two-level feature extraction scheme to represent dynamic textures and scenes, which applies a trained Convolutional Neural Network (ConvNet) as a feature extractor to extract mid-level features from each frame in a video and then computes the first and the second order statistics over the mid-level features. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first investigation of using a deep network with transferred knowledge to represent dynamic texture or scenes.
\item We investigate the effects of the spatial and temporal mid-level features
on three benchmark data sets. Experimental results show that: a) the spatial feature is more effective for categorizing the dynamic textures and dynamic scenes and b) when the video is stabilized the temporal feature could provide some complementary information.
\end{itemize}
}
\begin{figure}
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=1.0\linewidth]{spatialeffectiveness.eps}
\end{center}
\caption{Sample images from dynamic scene data set YUPENN. Each row corresponds a category.}
\label{fig:sample-img-spatial-effectiveness}
\end{figure}
The remainder of the paper is organized as follows. We review the related studies in Section~\ref{sec:related-work}
and present our proposals
in Section~\ref{sec:main-part}. We evaluate the proposed spatial and temporal TCoF schemes
in Section~\ref{sec:experiments} and finally we conclude this paper with a discussion in Section~\ref{sec:conclusion}.
\section{Related Work}
\label{sec:related-work}
In the literature, there are numerous approaches for dynamic texture and scene classification. While being closely relevant, dynamic texture classification \cite{xu2011dynamic, peteri2010dyntex, doretto2003dynamic, zhao2007dynamic, derpanis2012spacetime, derpanis2010dynamic, ravichandran2013categorizing, chaudhry2013dynamic} and dynamic scene classification \cite{theriault2013dynamic, feichtenhoferbags, derpanis2012dynamic, memiseviclearning, feichtenhofer2013spacetime, shroff2010moving} are usually considered separately as two different problems by far.
{\color{black}
The research history of dynamic texture classification is much longer than that of the dynamic scene. The later, as far as we know, started since two dynamic scene data sets -- Maryland Dynamic Scene data set ``in the wild''~\cite{shroff2010moving} and York stabilized Dynamic Scene data set~\cite{peteri2010dyntex} -- were released. Although there might not be a clear distinction in nature, the slight difference of dynamic texture from dynamic scene is that the frames in a video of dynamic texture consist of images with richer texture whereas the frames in a video of dynamic scene are a natural scene involving over time.
In addition, having mentioned of the data sets, compared to dynamic textures which are usually stabilized videos, the dynamic scene data set might include some significant camera motions.}
The critical challenges in categorizing the dynamic textures or scenes come from the wide range of variations around the naturally occurring phenomena.
To overcome the difficulty, numerous methods for video representation have been proposed.
Among them, Linear Dynamic System (LDS) based methods~\cite{doretto2003dynamic, ravichandran2013categorizing, afsari2012group, chaudhry2013dynamic}, GIST based method~\cite{oliva2001modeling}, Local Binary Pattern (LBP) based methods~\cite{ojala2002multiresolution, zhao2007dynamic, pietikainen2011computer, qi2012pairwise, rahtu2012local}, and wavelet based methods~\cite{derpanis2010dynamic, feichtenhoferbags, ji2013wavelet, xu2011dynamic} are the most widely used. LDS is a statistical generative model which captures the spatial appearance and dynamics in a video~\cite{doretto2003dynamic}. While LDS yields promising performance on viewpoint-invariant sequences, it performs poor on viewpoint-variant sequences~\cite{ravichandran2013categorizing, afsari2012group, chaudhry2013dynamic}. Besides, it is also sensitive to illumination variations.
GIST~\cite{oliva2001modeling} represents the spatial envelope of an image (or a frame in video) holistically by Gabor filter. However GIST suffers from scale and rotation variations.
Among LBP based methods, Local Binary Pattern on Three Orthogonal Planes (LBP-TOP)~\cite{zhao2007dynamic} is the most widely used. LBP-TOP describes a video by computing local binary pattern from three orthogonal planes ($xy$, $xt$ and $yt$) \textit{only}. After LBP-TOP, several variants have been proposed, e.g., Local Ternary Pattern on Three Orthogonal Planes (LTP-TOP) \cite{rahtu2012local}, Weber Local Descriptor on Three Orthogonal Planes (WLD-TOP)~\cite{chen2013automatic}, Local Phase Quantization on Three Orthogonal Planes (LQP-TOP)~\cite{rahtu2012local}. While LBP-TOP and its variants are effective at capturing spatial and temporal information and robust to illumination variations, they are suffering from camera motions.
Recently, wavelet based methods are also proposed, e.g., Spatiotemporal Oriented Energy (SOE)~\cite{feichtenhoferbags}, Wavelet Domain Multifractal Analysis (WDMA)~\cite{ji2013wavelet}, and Bag-of-Spacetime-Energy (BoSE)\cite{feichtenhoferbags}. Combined with the Improved Fisher Vector (IFV) encoding strategy~\cite{perronnin2010improving, chatfield2011devil}, BoSE leads to the state-of-the-art performance on dynamic scene classification.
However, the computational cost of BoSE is expensive due to slow feature extraction and quantization.
The aforementioned methods can be roughly divided into two categories: the \textit{global} approaches and the \textit{local} approaches.
The \textit{global} approaches extract features from each frame in a video sequence by treating each frame as a whole, e.g., LDS~\cite{doretto2003dynamic} and GIST~\cite{oliva2001modeling}.
While the global approaches describe the spatial layout information well, they suffer from the sensitivity to illumination variations, viewpoint changes, or scale and rotation variations.
The \textit{local} approaches construct a statistics (e.g., histogram) on a bunch of features extracted from local patches in each frame or local volumes in a video sequence,
including LBP-TOP~\cite{zhao2007dynamic}, LQP-TOP~\cite{rahtu2012local}, BoSE~\cite{feichtenhoferbags}, Bag of LDS~\cite{ravichandran2013categorizing}. While the local approaches are robustness to transformations (e.g., rotation, illumination), they suffer from the lack of spatial layout information which is important to represent a dynamic texture or dynamic scene.
{\color{black}
In this paper, we attempt to leverage a deep structure with transferred knowledge from image domain to construct a robust and effective
representation for dynamic textures and scenes. To be specific, we propose to use a pre-trained ConvNet -- which has been trained on the large-scale image data set ImageNet~\cite{krizhevsky2012imagenet}, \cite{sharif2014cnn}, \cite{azizpour2014generic} -- as transferred (prior) knowledge,
and then fine-tune the ConvNet with the frames in the videos of training set.
Equipped with a trained ConvNet, we extract mid-level features from each frame in a video and represent a video by the concatenation of the first and the second order statistics over the mid-level features.
Compare to previous studies, our approach possesses the following advantages:
\begin{itemize}
\item Our approach represents a video with a two-level strategy. The deep structure used in the frame level is easier to train or even train-free, since we can adopt prior knowledge from image domain.
\item The extracted frame-level features are robust to translations, small scale variations, partial rotations, and illumination variations.
\item Our approach represents a video sequence by a concatenation of the first and the second order statistics of the frame-level features.
This process is fast and effective.
\end{itemize}
}
In the next section, we will present the framework and two different implementations of our proposal.
\section{Our Proposal: Transferred ConvNet Feature (TCoF)}
\label{sec:main-part}
Our TCoF scheme consists of three stages:
\begin{itemize}
\item Constructing a ConvNet with transferred knowledge from image domain;
\item Extracting the mid-level feature with the ConvNet from each frame in a video;
\item Forming the video-level representation by concatenating the calculated first and the second order statistics over the frame-level features.
\end{itemize}
\subsection{Convolutional Neural Network with Transferred Knowledge for Extracting Frame-Level Features}
\begin{figure}
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=0.85\linewidth]{cnn.eps}
\end{center}
\caption{The typical structure of a ConvNet. }
\label{fig:cnn}
\end{figure}
Notice that there are a lots of work in learning deep structures for classifying images. Among them, Convolutional Neural Networks (ConvNets) have been demonstrated to be extremely successful in computer vision~\cite{lecun1998gradient, krizhevsky2012imagenet, sermanet2013overfeat, jia2014caffe, chatfield2014return, azizpour2014generic}.
We show a typical structure of a ConvNet in Fig.~\ref{fig:cnn}. The ConvNet consists of two types of layers: convolutional layers and full-connected layers. The convolutional part, as shown in the left panel of Fig.~\ref{fig:cnn}, consists of three components -- convolutions, Local Contrast Normalization (LCN), and pooling. Among the three components, the convolution block is compulsory,
and LCN and the pooling are optional. The convolution components capture complex image structures. The LCN achieves invariance to illumination variations. The pooling component can \textit{not only} yield partial invariance to scale variations and translations, but \textit{also} reduce the complexity for the downstream layers. Due to sharing parameters which is motivated by the \textit{local reception field} in biological vision system, the number of free parameters in the convolutional layer are significantly reduced. The full-connected layer, as shown in the right panel of Fig.~\ref{fig:cnn}, is the same as a multi-layer perception neural network.
\begin{figure*}[t]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=1.0\linewidth]{ConvNet.eps}
\end{center}
\caption{The architecture of the ConvNet used in our TCoF scheme.
\label{fig:ConvNet-5-2}
\end{figure*}
{\color{black}
In our TCoF framework, we use a ConvNet with five convolutional layers and two full-connected layers as shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:ConvNet-5-2}, which is the same as the most successful ConvNet implementation introduced by Krizhevsky et al.~\cite{krizhevsky2012imagenet} and won the large-scale ImageNet contest, to extract the mid-level feature from each frame in a video. Note that we remove the final full-connected layer in the ConvNet introduced in~\cite{krizhevsky2012imagenet}.
As mentioned previously, training well a deep network like that in Fig.\ref{fig:ConvNet-5-2} needs huge mount of training data and is quite expensive in computational demand. In our case, for dynamic texture or scene, the training data is limited.
In stead of training a deep network from scratch, which is quite time-consuming, we propose to use the pre-trained ConvNet~\cite{krizhevsky2012imagenet}
as the initialization, and fine-tune the ConvNet with the frames in videos from training data if necessary.
By using a good initialization, we virtually transfer miscellaneous prior knowledge from image domain (e.g., data set ImageNet) to the dynamic textures and scenes tasks.
}
\subsection{Construct Video-Level Representation}
\label{sec:video-level-representation}
Given a video sequence containing $N$ frames, the ConvNet yields $N$ ConvNet features. Note that as the input to the ConvNet in TCoF, we use each frame in a video subtracting \textit{an averaged image}.
Denote $X$ as a set of the ConvNet features $\{\textbf{x}_1, \textbf{x}_2, ..., \textbf{x}_N\}$ where $\textbf{x}_i \in R^d$ is the ConvNet feature extracted from $i$-th frame.
We extract the \textit{first} and the \textit{second order} statistics on feature set $X$.
The first-order statistics of $X$ is the \textit{mean} vector which is defined as follows:
\begin{equation}
\textbf{u} = \frac{1}{N} \sum_{i=1}^{N} \textbf{x}_i,
\label{eq:mean}
\end{equation}
where $\textbf{u}$ captures the average behaviors of the $N$ ConvNet features which reflect the average characteristics in the video sequence.
The second-order statistics is the \textit{covariance} matrix which is defined as follows:
\begin{equation}
\textbf{S} = \frac{1}{N} \sum_{i=1}^{N}(\textbf{x}_i-\textbf{u})(\textbf{x}_i-\textbf{u})^\top,
\label{eq:cov}
\end{equation}
where $\textbf{S}$ describes the variation of the $N$ ConvNet features from the mean vector $\textbf{u}$ and the correlations among different dimensions.
The dimension of covariance feature is $\frac{d\times (d+1)}{2}$.
When $d$ is large (e.g., $d = 4096$), the dimension of the covariance feature is high.
Instead, we propose to extract \textit{only} the diagonal entries in $\textbf{S}$ as the second-order feature, that is,
\begin{equation}
\textbf{v} = \text{diag}(\textbf{S}),
\label{eq:var}
\end{equation}
where $\text{diag}(\cdot)$ means to extract the diagonal entries of a matrix as a vector. The vector $\textbf{v}$ is $d$-dimensional and captures the variations along each dimension in the ConvNet features.
Having calculated the first and the second order statistics, we form the video-level representation, TCoF, by concatenating $\textbf{u}$ and $\textbf{v}$, i.e.,
\begin{equation}
\textbf{f} =\left[
\begin{array}{c}
\textbf{u} \\
\textbf{v} \\
\end{array}
\right],
\label{eq:TCoF}
\end{equation}
where the dimension of a TCoF representation is $2d$.
\begin{figure*}
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=1.0\linewidth]{STCNN.eps}
\end{center}
\caption{An illustration of our TCoF scheme.}
\label{fig:STCNN}
\end{figure*}
For clarity, we illustrate the flowchart of constructing a TCoF representation for a video sequence in Fig.~\ref{fig:STCNN}.
\noindent {\bf Remarks 1.}
Our proposed TCoF belongs to global approach. Since the spatial layout information can be captured well, we term the TCoF scheme described above as the \textit{spatial} TCoF. Our proposed TCoF possesses the robustness to translations, small scale variations, partial rotations, and illumination variations owing to the ConvNet component. In addition, the process of extracting a TCoF vector is extremely fast since that the ConvNet adopt a so-called \textit{stride} tactics and the second step in TCoF is to calculate the two statistics.
\subsection{Modeling Temporal Information}
\label{sec:temporal-TCoF}
While it is well accepted that dynamic information can enrich our understanding of the textures or scenes, modeling the dynamic information is difficult.
Unlike the motion of rigid object, dynamic texture and scene are usually involving of non-rigid objects and thus the optical flow information seems relatively random.
In this paper, we propose to use the difference of the adjacent two frames in a short-time to capture the random-like micro-motion patterns.
To be specific, we take the difference between the $(i+\tau)$-th and $i$-th frames as the input of the ConvNet component in TCoF scheme, where $\tau \in \{1, \cdots, N-1\}$ is an integer which corresponds to the resolution in time to capture the random-like micro-motion patterns. In practice, we set $\tau$ as a small integer, e.g., 1, 2 or 3.
Given a video sequence containing $N$ frames, the ConvNet produces $N-\tau$ \textit{temporal} frame-level features. Then we extract the \textit{first} and the \textit{second order} statistics on the temporal ConvNet features to form a temporal TCoF for the input video, in the same way as the spatial TCoF in Section~\ref{sec:video-level-representation}.
\noindent {\bf Remarks 2.}
The temporal TCoF differs from the spatial TCoF in the input of the ConvNet. In the spatial TCoF, we take each frame in a video subtracting a precalculated average image as input; whereas in the temporal TCoF we take the difference of two frames in a short-time and
there is no need to subtract an average image.
\noindent {\bf Remarks 3.}
In our proposed TCoF, we treat the extracted $N$ ConvNet features as a set and ignore
the sequential information among features.
The rationale of this simplification comes from the property of dynamic textures and dynamic scenes. Note that the dynamic textures are visual processes of a group of particles with random motions, and dynamic scenes are places where natural events are occurring, the sequential information
in these processes are relatively random and thus
less critical. Experimental results in Section~\ref{sec:evaluation-spatial-temporal-TCoF} support this point.
\section{Experiments}
\label{sec:experiments}
In this section, we introduce the benchmark data sets, the baseline methods, and the implementation details, and then present the experimental evaluations of our approach.
\subsection{Data Sets Description}
{\bf{DynTex}}~\cite{peteri2010dyntex}
is a widely used dynamic texture data set, containing 656 videos with each sequence recorded in PAL format.
The sequences in DynTex are divided into three data subsets -- ``Alpha'',
``Beta'' and ``Gamma'':
a) ``Alpha'' data subset contains 60 sequences which are equally divided into 3 categories: ``sea'', ``grass'' and ``trees'';
b) ``Beta'' data subset consists 162 sequences which are grouped into 10 categories: ``sea'', ``grass'', ``trees'', ``flags'', ``calm water'', ``fountains'', ``smoke'', ``escalator'', ``traffic'', and ``rotation'';
c) ``Gamma'' data subset is composed of 264 sequences which are grouped into 10 categories: ``flowers", ``sea'', ``trees without foliage'', ``dense foliage'', ``escalator'', ``calm water'', ``flags'', ``grass'', ``traffic'' and ``fountains''. Compared to ``Alpha'' and ``Beta'' data subsets, this data subset contains more complex image variations, e.g., scale, orientation, and etc.
Sample frames from the three data subsets are shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:dynSamples}.
\begin{figure}
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=0.95\linewidth]{dyntexsamples.eps}
\end{center}
\caption{Sample frames from DynTex data set. The ``Alpha'' , ``Beta'', and ``Gamma'' show the sample frames from each category in the data set.}
\label{fig:dynSamples}
\end{figure}
{\bf{YUPENN}} \cite{derpanis2012dynamic}
is a ``stabilized'' dynamic scenes data set. This data set was introduced to emphasize scene-specific temporal information. YUPENN consists of fourteen dynamic scene categories with 30 color videos in each category.
The sequences in YUPENN have significant variations, such as frame rate, scene appearance, scale, illumination, and camera viewpoint. Some sample frames are shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:yupenn}.
\begin{figure}
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=1.0\linewidth]{yorksample.eps}
\end{center}
\caption{Samples from dynamic scene data set YUPENN. Each image corresponds to a category of video sequence.}
\label{fig:yupenn}
\end{figure}
{\bf{Maryland}} \cite{shroff2010moving}
is a dynamic scene data set which was introduced firstly. It consists of 13 categories with 10 videos per category.
The data set have large variations in illumination, frame rate, viewpoint, and scale. Besides, there are variations in resolution and camera dynamics.
Some sample frames are shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:maryland}.
\begin{figure}
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=1.0\linewidth]{maryland.eps}
\end{center}
\caption{Sample frames from Maryland scenes data set. }
\label{fig:maryland}
\end{figure}
\subsection{Baselines and Implementation Details}
\label{baselines-implementations}
{\bf{Baselines}} We compare our proposed TCoF approach with the following state-of-the-art methods\footnote{For the LBP-TOP, we report the results with our own implementation and for other methods we cite the results from their papers.}.
\begin{itemize}
\item GIST \cite{oliva2001modeling}: Holistic representation of the spatial envelope which is widely used in 2D static scene classification.
\item Histogram of Flow (HOF) \cite{marszalek2009actions}: The HOF is an well-known descriptor in action recognition.
\item Local Binary Pattern on Three Orthogonal Planes (LBP-TOP) \cite{zhao2007dynamic}: The LBP-TOP is widely used in dynamic texture, dynamic facial expression, and dynamic facial micro-expression.
\item Chaotic Dynamic Features (Chaos) \cite{shroff2010moving}.
\item Slow Feature Analysis (SFA) \cite{theriault2013dynamic}.
\item Synchrony Autoencoder (SAE) \cite{memiseviclearning}.
\item Synchrony K-means (SK-means) \cite{memiseviclearning}.
\item Complementary Spacetime Orientation (CSO) \cite{feichtenhofer2013spacetime}: In CSO, the complementary spatial and temporal features are fused in a random forest framework.
\item Bag of Spacetime Energy (BoSE) \cite{feichtenhoferbags}.
\end{itemize}
{\bf{Implementation Details.}} In both the spatial TCoF (s-TCoF) and the temporal TCoF (t-TCoF), we resize the frame into $224\times 224$ and normalize both s-TCoF and t-TCoF with $L_2$-norm, respectively. For the combination of both the spatial and temporal TCoF, we take the concatenation of the two normalized s-TCoF and t-TCoF and denote it as st-TCoF. We do not use any data augmentation method.
For our t-TCoF, we use $\tau = 3$. We use the CAFFE toolbox~\cite{jia2014caffe} to extract the proposed TCoFs.
Note that we take the weights in each layers but the final full connection layer in the well-trained ConvNet~\cite{krizhevsky2012imagenet} as the initialization.
And then, the whole ConvNet could be fine-tuned with the train data.
While the fine-tuning stage is easier than training a ConvNet from scratch with random initialization, we observed that the improvement by the extra fine-tuning was minor. Thus we use the ConvNet without a further fine-tuning to extract the mid-level features.\footnote{Note that we use the Leave-One-Out cross-validation to evaluate the performance. The training data are changed from each trial. If we chose to fine-tune the ConvNet, we should fine-tune for each trial. Since the improvements were minor, we report the results without a fine-tuning to keep all experimental results are repeatable.}
For LBP-TOP, we use the best performing setting of $\text{LBP-TOP}_{8,8,8,1,1,1}$, and
the ${\chi}^2$ kernel.
To fairly compare with previous methods, we test our approach and other baselines with both the nearest neighbor (NN) classifier and SVM classifier separately. In SVM, we use a linear SVM with Libsvm toolbox \cite{chang2011libsvm}, in which the tradeoff parameter $C$ is fixed to 40 in all our experiments. Following the standard protocol,
we use Leave-One-Out (LOO) cross-validation.
\subsection{Evaluation of the Spatial and Temporal TCoFs}
\label{sec:evaluation-spatial-temporal-TCoF}
In this subsection, we evaluate systematically the influence of
using the spatial and temporal TCoFs on DynTex, YUPENN, and Maryland data sets.
{\bf{Effectiveness of the $s$-TCoF.}}
Since that the s-TCoF features are constructed by accumulating all features in all frames, it is interesting to investigate the effect to the final performance of using different number of frames. To this end, we evaluate the s-TCoF using seven different settings: 1) using only the \textit{first} frame in a video, 2) using the first $\frac{N}{8}$ frames in a video, 3) using the first $\frac{N}{4}$ frames in a video, 4) using the first $\frac{N}{2}$ frames in a video, and 5) using all $N$ frames in a video.
Experimental results are shown in Table~\ref{table:spatialfeatures}.
\begin{table}[ht]
\caption{Evaluation of the spatial TCoF (s-TCoF) by using different number of frames. }
\small
\centering
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c}
\hline
Datasets & 1st & $\frac{N}{8}$ & $\frac{N}{4}$ & $\frac{N}{2}$ & $N$\\
\hline
Alpha(NN) &100 & 100 & 100 & 100 & 100 \\
Beta (NN) &98.77 & 99.38 & 99.38 & 98.77 & 99.38 \\
Gamma(NN) &97.73 & 97.35 & 96.97 & 96.97 & 96.59 \\
\hline
YUPENN(NN) &95.71 & 96.43 & 96.19 & 96.43 & 95.48 \\
YUPENN(SVM) &96.90 & 96.90 & 96.90 & \textbf{97.14} & 96.90 \\
\hline
Maryland(NN) &72.31 & \textbf{80.00} & 75.38 & 77.69 & 76.92 \\
Maryland(SVM) &80.00 & 83.85 & 80.77 & 83.08 & \textbf{88.46} \\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\label{table:spatialfeatures}
\end{table}
From Table \ref{table:spatialfeatures}, we can see that the spatial TCoF performs well by even using the first frame \textit{only}, on DynTex and YUPENN data sets.
This confirmed the effectiveness of the spatial TCoF scheme.
\begin{table}[ht]
\caption{ Evaluating the performance of temporal TCoF (t-TCoF) as a function of parameter $\tau$. }
\centering
\small
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c c }
\hline
Datasets & $\tau = 1$ & $\tau = 2$ & $\tau = 3$ & $\tau = 4$ & $\tau = 5$\\
\hline
Alpha(NN) & 98.33 & 96.67 & 96.67 & 96.67 & 96.67\\
Beta (NN) & 97.53 & 96.91 & 97.53 & 97.53 & 97.53\\
Gamma(NN) & 93.56 & 94.32 & 93.18 & 93.18 & 93.94\\
\hline
YUPENN(NN) & 90.24 & 91.19 & 92.38 & 93.57 & 93.10\\
YUPENN(SVM) & 94.52 & 96.19 & 96.67 & 96.90 & 97.14\\
\hline
Maryland(NN) & 55.38 & 56.92 & 57.69 & 61.54 & 63.85\\
Maryland(SVM) & 66.92 & 62.31 & 61.54 & 63.85 & 63.85\\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\label{table:temporalfeatures}
\end{table}
{\bf{Effectiveness of the $t$-TCoF.}} Here, we conduct experiments to evaluate the influence of the parameter $\tau$.
Experimental results are shown in Table \ref{table:temporalfeatures}. We observe from Table~\ref{table:temporalfeatures} that t-TCoF is not sensitive to the choice of $\tau$.
{\bf{Comparison of s-TCof and t-TCoF.}}
Note that almost all the results of s-TCoF in Table~\ref{table:spatialfeatures} outperform that of t-TCoF in Table~\ref{table:temporalfeatures}. This suggest that s-TCoF is more effective than t-TCoF, since the randomness of the micro-motions in dynamic texture or natural dynamic scene makes the temporal information less critical. Nevertheless t-TCoF could provide complementary information to s-TCoF in some case that will be shown later.
\subsection{Comparisons with the State-of-the-Art Methods}
{\bf{Dynamic Texture Classification on DynTex Data Set}}
We conduct a set of experiments to compare our methods with LBP-TOP.
Experimental results are shown in Table \ref{table:dyntexresults}.
\begin{table}[ht]
\caption{Classification Results on DynTex dynamic texture data set. The performance of LBP-TOP is based on our implementation. All methods use NN classifier.}
\centering
\small
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c}
\hline
Datasets & LBP-TOP & s-TCoF & t-TCoF &st-TCoF\\
\hline
Alpha & 96.67 & \textbf{100} & 96.67 & 98.33\\
Beta & 85.80 & \textbf{99.38} & 97.53 & 98.15\\
Gamma & 84.85 & 95.83 & 93.56 & \textbf{98.11}\\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\label{table:dyntexresults}
\end{table}
We observe from Table \ref{table:dyntexresults} that:
\begin{enumerate}
\item The s-TCoF performs the best on data subsets Alpha and Beta. This results confirm that the s-TCoF is effective for dynamic texture classification.
\item On Gamma subset, s-TCoF and t-TCoF significantly outperform LBP-TOP. Moreover by combining s-TCoF with t-TCoF, we achieve the best result. This result suggests that t-TCoF might provide complementary information to s-TCoF.
\end{enumerate}
{\bf{Dynamic Scene Classification on YUPENN. }}
We compare our methods with the state-of-the-art methods, including CSO, GIST, SFA, SOE, SAE, BOSE, SK-means, and LBP-TOP, and the experimental results are presented in Table \ref{table:yupennresults} and
Table \ref{table:yupenndetail}. We observe from Table \ref{table:yupennresults} that:
\begin{enumerate}
\item The s-TCoF and t-TCoF both outperform the state-of-the-art methods.
Note that YUPENN consist of stabilized videos. These results confirm that both s-TCoF and t-TCoF are effective for dynamic scene data in a stabilized setting.
\item The combination of the s-TCoF and t-TCoF, i.e., the st-TCoF, performs the best, in which reduce the error relatively over $30\%$. As shown is Table~\ref{table:yupenndetail}, s-TCoF and t-TCoF are complementary to each other on some categories, e.g., ``Light Storm'', ``Railway'', ``Snowing'', and ``Wind. Farm''.
\end{enumerate}
\begin{table*}[ht]
\caption{Classification results on scene data set YUPENN. The results of are taken from the corresponding papers. The performance of LBP-TOP is based on our implementation.}
\centering
\scriptsize
\begin{tabular}{@{\ }c@{\ } @{\ }c@{\ } @{\ }c@{\ } @{\ }c@{\ } @{\ }c@{\ } @{\ }c@{\ } @{\ }c@{\ } @{\ }c@{\ } @{\ }c@{\ } @{\ }c@{\ } @{\ }c@{\ } @{\ }c@{\ } }
\hline
Methods & CSO & GIST & SFA & SAE & SOE & BoSE & SK-means & LBP-TOP & s-TCoF & t-TCoF & st-TCoF \\
\hline
NN & - & 56 & - & 80.7 & 74 & - & - & 75.95 & 96.43 & 93.10 & \bf{98.81} \\
SVM & 85.95& - & 85.48 & 96.0 & 80.71 & 96.19 & 95.2 & 84.29 & 97.14 & 97.86 & \bf{99.05}
\\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\label{table:yupennresults}
\end{table*}
\begin{table*}[ht]
\caption{Category-wise accuracy ($\%$) for different methods on dynamic scene data set YUPENN. All methods use linear SVM classifier. Our methods and LBP-TOP are based on our implementation. The other results are taken from \cite{feichtenhoferbags}.}
\centering
\scriptsize
\begin{tabular}{@{\ }c@{\ } @{\ }c@{\ } @{\ }c@{\ } @{\ }c@{\ } @{\ }c@{\ } @{\ }c@{\ } @{\ }c@{\ } @{\ }c@{\ } @{\ }c@{\ } @{\ }c@{\ } @{\ }c@{\ } }
\hline
\multirow{2}{*}{Categories} & HOF+ & Chaos+ & \multirow{2}{*}{SOE} & \multirow{2}{*}{SFA} & \multirow{2}{*}{CSO} & \multirow{2}{*}{LBP-TOP} & \multirow{2}{*}{BoSE} & \multirow{2}{*}{s-TCoF} & \multirow{2}{*}{t-TCoF} & \multirow{2}{*}{st-TCoF}\\
& GIST & GIST & & & & & & & & \\
\hline
Beach & 87 & 30 & 93 & 93 & 100 & 87& 100 & 97 & 97 & 97 \\
Elevator & 87 & 47 & 100 & 97 & 100 & 97 & 97 & 100 & 100 & 100 \\
Forest Fire & 63 & 17 & 67 & 70 & 83 & 87 & 93 & 100 & 97 & 100 \\
Fountain & 43 & 3 & 43 & 57 & 47 & 37& 87 & 100 & 97 & 100 \\
Highway & 47 & 23 & 70 & 93 & 73 & 77 & 100 & 97 & 100 & 100 \\
Light Storm & 63 & 37 & 77 & 87 & 93 & 93& 97 & 90 & 100 & 100 \\
Ocean & 97 & 43 & 100 & 100 & 90 & 97 & 100 & 100 & 100 & 100 \\
Railway & 83 & 7 & 80 & 93 & 93 &80 & 100 & 97 & 100 & 100 \\
Rush River & 77 & 10 & 93 & 87 & 97 & 100 & 97 & 97 & 97 & 97 \\
Sky-Clouds & 87 & 47 & 83 & 93 & 100 &93 & 97 & 100 & 97 & 100 \\
Snowing & 47 & 10 & 87 & 70 & 57 &83 & 97 & 90 & 97 & 97 \\
Street & 77 & 17 & 90 & 97 & 97 &93 & 100 & 100 & 97 & 100 \\
Waterfall & 47 & 10 & 63 & 73 & 77 &90 & 83 & 93 & 93 & 97 \\
Wind. Farm & 53 & 17 & 83 & 87 & 93 & 67& 100 & 100 & 100 & 100 \\
\hline
Overall & 68.33 & 22.86 & 80.71 & 85.48 & 85.95& 84.29&96.19 & 97.14 & 97.86 & \bf{99.05} \\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\label{table:yupenndetail}
\end{table*}
{\bf{Dynamic Scene Classification on dynamic scene data set Maryland. }}
We present the comparison of our methods with the state-of-the-art methods in Table \ref{table:marylandresults}.
We observe from Table \ref{table:marylandresults} that:
\begin{enumerate}
\item The s-TCoF significantly outperforms the other methods. This suggests that the spatial information is extremely important for scene understanding.
\item The results of t-TCoF are much worse than s-TCoF. This might be due to the significant camera motions in this data set.
\end{enumerate}
\begin{table*}[ht]
\caption{Classification results on scene data set Maryland. The results of are taken from the corresponding papers. The performance of LBP-TOP is based on our implementation.}
\centering
\scriptsize
\begin{tabular}{@{\ }c@{\ \ } @{\ \ }c@{\ \ } @{\ \ }c@{\ \ } @{\ \ }c@{\ \ } @{\ \ }c@{\ \ } @{\ \ }c@{\ \ } @{\ \ }c@{\ \ } @{\ \ }c@{\ \ } @{\ \ }c@{\ \ } @{\ \ }c@{\ }}
\hline
Methods & CSO & SFA & SOE & BoSE & LBP-TOP & s-TCoF & t-TCoF & st-TCoF\\
\hline
NN & - & - & - & - & 31.54 & 74.62 & 58.46 & 74.62 \\
SVM & 67.69& 60 & 43.1 & 77.69 & 39.23 & \bf{88.46} & 66.15 & \bf{88.46} \\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\label{table:marylandresults}
\end{table*}
\subsection{Further Investigations and Remarks}
\label{sec:further-investigation-discussion}
{\bf{Data Visualization. }} To show the discriminative power of the proposed approach, we use
t-Stochastic Neighbor Embedding (t-SNE)\footnote{t-SNE is a (prize-winning) technique for dimensionality reduction that is particularly well suited for the visualization of high-dimensional data.} \cite{van2008visualizing} to visualize the data distributions of the dynamic scene data sets YUPENN and Maryland.
Results are shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:yorkSNE} and Fig.~\ref{fig:marylandSNE}, respectively. We observe from Fig.~\ref{fig:yorkSNE} and Fig.~\ref{fig:marylandSNE} that s-TCoF, t-TCoF, and st-TCoF yield distinct separations between categories. These results reveal the effectiveness of our proposed TCoF approach vividly.
\begin{figure*}
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=1.0\linewidth]{yorkSNE.eps}
\end{center}
\caption{Data visualization of LBP-TOP, s-TCoF, t-TCoF, and st-TCoF on YUPENN dynamic scene data set. Each point in the figure corresponds to a video sequence.}
\label{fig:yorkSNE}
\end{figure*}
\begin{figure*}
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=0.95\linewidth]{marylandSNE.eps}
\end{center}
\caption{Data visualization of LBP-TOP, s-TCoF, t-TCoF, and st-TCoF on Maryland dynamic scene data set. Each point in the figure corresponds to a video sequence.}
\label{fig:marylandSNE}
\end{figure*}
{\bf{Remarks. }}
Note that in our TCoF schemes, we treat the frames in a video as orderless images and extract mid-level features with a ConvNet. By doing so, the sequential information among features is ignored. The superior experimental results suggest that such a simplification is harmless.
The sequential information in these processes contributes less (or not at all) discriminativeness, because that the dynamic textures can be viewed as visual processes of a group of particles with random motions, and the dynamic scenes are places where natural events are occurring.
The effectiveness underlying our proposed TCoF approach for dynamic texture and scene classification is due to the following aspects:
\begin{itemize}
\item Rich filters' combination built on color channels in ConvNet describes richer structures and color information. The filters that are built on different image patches capture stronger and richer structures compared to the hand-crafted features.
\item ConvNet makes the extracted features robust to sorts of image transformations due to the max-pooling and LCN components. Specifically the max-pooling tactics makes ConvNet robust to translations, small scale variations, and partial rotations, and LCN makes ConvNet robust to illumination variations.
\item The first and the second order statistics
capture enough
information over the mid-level features.
\item When the video sequences are stabilized, the t-TCoF might provide complementary information to the s-TCoF.
\end{itemize}
\section{Conclusion and Discussion}
\label{sec:conclusion}
We have proposed a robust and effective feature extraction approach for dynamic texture and scene classification, termed as Transferred ConvNet Features (TCoF), which was built on the first and the second order statistics of the mid-level features extracted by a ConvNet with transferred knowledge from image domain.
We have investigated two different implementations of the TCoF scheme, i.e., the \textit{spatial} TCoF and the \textit{temporal} TCoF. We have evaluated systematically the proposed approaches on three benchmark data sets and confirmed that: a) the proposed \textit{spatial} TCoF was effective, and b) the \textit{temporal} TCoF could provides complementary information when the camera is stabilized.
{\color{black}
Unlike images, representing a video sequence needs to consider the following aspects:
\begin{enumerate}
\item To depict the spatial information. In most cases, we can recognize the dynamic textures and scenes from a single frame in a video. Thus, extracting the spatial information of each frame in a video might be an effective way to represent the dynamic textures or scenes.
\item To capture the temporal information. In dynamic textures or scenes, there are some specific micro-motion patterns. Capturing these micro-motion patterns might help to better understand the dynamic textures or scenes.
\item To fuse the spatial and temporal information. When the spatial and temporal information are complementary, combining both of them might boost the recognition performance.
\end{enumerate}
Different from the rigid or semi-rigid objects (e.g., actions), the dynamics of texture and scene are relatively random and non-directional.
Whereas the temporal information might be the most important cue in action recognition~\cite{marszalek2009actions, karpathy2014large},
our investigation in this paper suggests that the sequential information in dynamic textures or scenes is \textit{not that critical} for classification.
}
\section*{Acknowledgement}
X. Qi, G. Zhao, X. Hong, and M. Pietik{\"a}inen are supported in part by the Academic of Finland and InfoTech.
C.-G. Li is supported partially by the Scientific Research Foundation for the Returned Overseas Chinese Scholars, the Ministry of Education, China.
The authors would like to thank
Renaud P\'{e}teri,
Richard P. Wildes and
Pavan Turaga for sharing the DynTex dynamic texture, YUPENN dynamic scene, and Maryland dynamic scene data sets.
\bibliographystyle{elsarticle-harv}
\small
|
\section{Particles moving in mysterious ways}
\label{intro}
\paragraph{History - }The tunnel effect is one of the most subtle phenomenon explained by quantum mechanics, responsible e.g., for the existence of stars and ultimately for the existence of life \cite{Hoy54}. The first application of particle incursion into classically forbidden regions was done in nuclear physics. Nuclei, such as $^{210}$Po, emit $\alpha$-particles by tunneling through the Coulomb barrier. This process lacked physical explanation until George Gamow used the tunneling theory to calculate $\alpha$-emission half-lives \cite{Gam28,GC28}. Tunneling is now a well known physical process that has been incorporated in our everyday lives due to the increasing miniaturization in electronics such as microchips. There have been important Nobel Prizes related to the straightforward use of this effect in industry, such as the tunnel diode \cite{Esa73} or the scanning tunneling microscope \cite{BR86}.
\paragraph{Resonant tunneling - }Resonant tunneling is a particular kind of tunneling effect, frequently applied to miniaturization such as the resonant diode tunneling device. In its simplest form, resonant tunneling occurs when a quantum level in one side of a barrier has an energy match with a level on the other side of it. If this occurs in a dynamical situation, tunneling is enhanced. In certain situations, the transmission probability is equal to one and the barrier is completely transparent for particle transmission. In the resonant diode tunneling device, two semiconductor layers sandwich another creating a double-humped barrier which enables the existence of quantum levels within. On both sides of the barrier, electrons fill a conducting band on two outside semiconductors. A potential difference between these outer layers allows one conducting band to rise in energy. Resonant tunneling leaking occurs to the levels inside the double-hump barrier \cite{Esa73}. The net effect is the appearance of a current which can be fine tuned. Resonant tunneling devices are compact and allow a fast response because the tunneling between the thin double-humped barrier is a very fast process.
\paragraph{Composite particles - }Resonant tunneling is not constrained to a particle tunneling though a double-humped barrier. An equivalent process occurs when a composite particle tunnels through a single barrier, if each subsystem composing the particle is allowed to tunnel independently or when the interaction reveals a priori unknown energy states. Then the process is equivalent to the tunneling of one single particle though a double-humped barrier, and resonant tunneling proceeds through the appearance of pseudo, quasi-bound, states (see Figure \ref{comptun}, left). This effect occurs frequently in atomic, molecular and nuclear systems. A good example is the fusion of loosely-bound nuclei \cite{Bert11}. It also relates to Feshbach resonances when a system uncovers a state in a (closed) channel which is not the same (open) channel where it sits in. This happens because the coupling with at least one internal degree of freedom helps the reaction to proceed via resonant tunneling (see Figure \ref{comptun}, right).
\begin{figure*}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{comptun.pdf}
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \includegraphics[width=0.39\textwidth]{fesres.pdf}
\caption{{\it Left:} Tunneling of a composite particle through a barrier is often equivalent to the tunneling of a single particle through a double-humped barrier. {\it Right:} A Feshbach resonance appears when a preferred tunneling is induced by the coupling of a reaction channel to one or more intrinsic degrees of freedom.}
\label{comptun}
\end{figure*}
\begin{figure*}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=1.05\textwidth]{singdoub.pdf}
\caption{{\it Left:} Tunneling of a composite particle through a single barrier. {\it Right, (a) and (b):} The effective potential for the center of mass motion of the system.}
\label{dh}
\end{figure*}
In the next Section I give several examples of how intrinsic degrees of freedom manifest in subtle ways, leading to tunneling enhancement or suppression. As the subject is very vast and general, I will concentrate on examples that I had the opportunity to work with during the last decades. They range from particle to molecular physics. Some common characteristics are easy to understand, others not so much. An example of the last case if given for diffusion and dissociation of molecules in optical lattices.
\section{Tunneling of composite particles}
Most theoretical problems involving tunneling are not amenable to analytical solutions. There are several computational methods available for them. Below I will just mention a very well-known method, used to generate some of the calculations displayed in the figures of this review.
\paragraph{Stalking microscopic particles - }It is interesting to study the time-dependence of tunneling, although it is prohibitive for most cases of interest due to the long tunneling times, e.g., in nuclear $\alpha$-decay processes. The time evolution of a wave function on a space lattice can obtained by solving the Schr\"odinger equation by a finite difference method. The wave function $\Psi(t+\Delta t)$ can be calculated from the wave function at time $t$, $\Psi(t)$, by applying the unitary time evolution operator, $U$, i.e., $\Psi(t+\Delta t) = U(\Delta t, t) \Psi(t)= \exp{\left[ -iH\Delta t/\hbar\right]} \Psi(t)$, where $H$ is the system Hamiltonian. For a small time step $\Delta t$, one can use the unitary operator approximation, valid to order $(\Delta t)^2$,
\begin{equation}
U (t + \Delta t) = {1+(\Delta t/2i\hbar)H(t) \over 1-(\Delta t/2i\hbar)H(t)} \label{Udt}.
\end{equation}
Other approximations for $\exp{\left[- iH\Delta t/\hbar\right]} $ such as the Numerov algorithm, etc., can also be used. Any of these numerical procedures requires carrying out matrix multiplications and inversions at each iteration and the number of operations grows very fast with the number of points in the coordinate lattice \cite{Var62,PTV07}. It also increases with the number of particles in the system at hand, becoming numerically demanding for large fermionic or bosonic systems \cite{Ste15}. But the most difficult problem is related to the existence of times scales which differ by a large amount. For example, during alpha decay the decay time is often much larger (e.g., $10^{30}$ ) than the intrinsic time dependence of the alpha particle state in the nucleus. This makes it impossible to treat the problem in a time-dependent fashion. But there are ongoing theoretical efforts to handle the time-dependent problem with widely different time scales \cite{TBR91,PL04,BF06}.
\begin{figure*}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.35\textwidth]{prob.pdf}
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \includegraphics[width=0.34\textwidth]{prob2.pdf}
\caption{{\it Left:} Transmission probabilities for a two-body system through a rectangular barrier \cite{SK94} as a function of the ratio of the center of mass energy and the barrier height $V_0$. The solid line is the transmission probability in which the system remains in the ground state and the dashed line is the for the case the system transits to an excited state. {\it Right:} Transmission probability of a molecule through a thin barrier as a function of the barrier width $a$ times the molecule momentum. The dashed curve is the transmission probability when the molecule is in an excited state after the transmission \cite{GS05}.}
\label{prob}
\end{figure*}
\begin{figure*}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.31\textwidth]{deut.pdf}
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \includegraphics[width=0.31\textwidth]{deut2.pdf}
\caption{{\it Left:} A schematic rectangular barrier simulates the proton-nucleus interaction for a deuteron-nucleus fusion reaction. The solid curve is the effective potential for the center of mass motion. {\it Right:} Transmission probability for the deuteron, with (solid) and without (dashed) consideration of coupling to intrinsic modes \cite{BFZ07}.}
\label{prob2}
\end{figure*}
As an application of the method described above, I will present below results for the tunneling of a two-body system through a simple rectangular barrier.
\paragraph{Transmission of composite particles - } Assume a system of two bound particles with an attractive infinite square-well interaction of range $d$, being transmitted through a rectangular barrier of width $a$ and height $V_0$. By choosing the center of mass $x=(x_1+x_2)/2$ and relative $y=x_1-x_2+d/2$ coordinates, it is straightforward to show that the center of mass wave equation has an effective double-humped potential $W(x,y)$. Figure \ref{dh} shows that for various values of the relative distance $y$, the effective potential $W$ is in fact a double-humped barrier \cite{Esa73,SK94}. This barrier can hold energy states that yields resonant tunneling if they are equal to the center of mass energy, as shown in Figure \ref{prob} for the dependence of the ratio of the bombarding energy and the barrier height \cite{Esa73,SK94}.
The simple example mentioned above can be readily applied to a very practical case; that of a bound molecule transmitting through a barrier. This is illustrated below.
\paragraph{Transmission of molecules - } Another way to enhance tunneling is allowing the system to make a transition from an excited state to a lower energy state. This has been shown analytically in Ref. \cite{BFZ07} for a two-spin system tunneling though a barrier. The transmission probability as a function of the barrier width also shows signs of resonant behavior, as observed in calculations for transmission of molecules though barriers \cite{GS05}. Figure \ref{prob} shows the transmission probabilities for a two-body system through a rectangular barrier \cite{SK94} as a function of the ratio of the center of mass energy and the barrier height $V_0$. The solid line is the transmission probability when the system remains in the ground state and the dashed line is when the system transits to an excited state. The right hand side of Figure \ref{prob} shows the transmission probability of a molecule through a thin barrier as a function of the barrier width $a$ times the molecule momentum. The dashed curve is the transmission probability when the molecule is in an excited state after the transmission \cite{GS05}. By moving to its ground state the excited molecule increases its chance of transmission. On the opposite trend, the opening of the higher channels decreases the probability of transmission.
The two-body tunneling problem also encounters abundant applications in nuclear physics, involving cluster-like objects. The simplest one is the deuteron, composed of a proton and a neutron forming a relatively loose-bound system ($E_B=-2.224$ MeV). Other common systems include those containing alpha particles. Tunneling involves sudden accelerations leading to gamma-emission in alpha tunneling, as described below.
\paragraph{Fusion of loosely bound nuclei - } Loosely-bound systems also display interesting tunneling properties because they can end up in separate parts by reflection or transmission through a barrier. If the separate parts see a different barrier then the effective barrier for the center of mass tunneling can also be very different than the original one. A good example is the fusion of the deuteron with another nucleus in which case the proton-nucleus potential has a Coulomb repulsion part whereas the neutron-nucleus potential does not. As shown in Ref. \cite{BFZ07} the net effect is an enhancement of the transmission probability through the barrier (see Figure \ref{prob2}). Fusion of exotic, neutron rich, nuclei due to particle transfer, or tunneling, is now a very active area of research \cite{CDLH95,TKS93,HPCD92,HPCD93,DV95,Lem09,AV10,SS11} (for a review, see Ref. \cite{CGDH06}).
An intriguing question is how much time a particle takes to tunnel a barrier \cite{LM94}. A Bremsstrahlung measurement following $\alpha$-decay \cite{Kas97} apparently paved the way to determine tunneling times by inspecting the interference pattern in the radiation spectra. A time-dependent description of the emission process with a pre-formed $\alpha$-particle has shown that a model with a free, uncorrelated, $\alpha$-particle within the nucleus is incompatible with the observations for this process \cite{DPZ99}. The spectrum of Ref. \cite{Kas97} was also explained in a more traditional theoretical method \cite{PB98,Boi07,Jen08}. However, the question related to tunneling times is still fascinating, in particular when it comes to the possibility of time travel and the existence of time warps and worm holes \cite{Haw92}.
\begin{figure*}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.41\textwidth]{munch1.pdf}
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \includegraphics[width=0.44\textwidth]{munch2.pdf}
\caption{{\it Left:} The quantum M\"unchhausen effect \cite{FZ99}. {\it Right:} Enhancement of fusion for the reaction d + $^3$He due to couplings to real and virtual photons.}
\label{prob3}
\end{figure*}
The emission of radiation during tunneling is also manifest in virtual processes, a fascinating discussion of which is presented below.
\paragraph{The quantum M\"unchhausen effect - } Additional interactions during tunneling can lead to other subtle effects, e.g., as proposed in Ref. \cite{FZ99}. Since barrier transmission is proportional to an exponentially decreasing dependence with the particle energy, any small effect can change it dramatically. The so-called quantum M\"unchhausen\footnote{Baron M\"unchhausen is supposedly the greatest liar ever depicted in fiction literature and in movies. He once explained how he could save himself from sinking in quicksand by pulling his own hair up \cite{Ras70}.} effect assumes that a virtual photon emitted in one side of the barrier and caught on the other side can enhance barrier penetrabilities (Figure \ref{prob3}). This is allowable in quantum mechanics because a particle has an extended wave nature. The particle kinetic energy can momentarily increase (within bounds set by Heisenberg's uncertainty principle) and tunneling can be enhanced. A non-relativistic reduction of the particle-radiation interaction yields \cite{FZ99}
\begin{equation}
H\Psi({\bf r}) + \int \Pi ({\bf r}, {\bf r}' ;E)\Psi({\bf r}') d{\bf r}'=E\Psi({\bf r}), \ \ \ \ {\rm where} \ \ \ \ \Pi ({\bf r}, {\bf r}' ;E)= M ({\bf r}, {\bf r}' ;E)+i\Gamma ({\bf r}, {\bf r}' ;E).
\end{equation}
In this expression, $M$ includes the self-energy, mass renormalization and virtual photons, while $\Gamma$ includes the effects of radiative decay width and real photons. This effect has been studied further in Ref. \cite{HB02} and it was shown to be very small indeed for tunneling of stable nuclei. But an account of this effect for loosely-bound nuclei (and molecules) has not been explored at depth.
\begin{figure*}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.35\textwidth]{phlev.pdf}
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \includegraphics[width=0.31\textwidth]{phexch.pdf}
\caption{{\it Left:} Energy levels of an electron as a function of the distance between a proton and a hydrogen atom. {\it Right:} The exchange probability as a function of the impact parameter for two proton kinetic energies. }
\label{phlev}
\end{figure*}
In atomic systems, electron tunneling is sometimes responsible for chemical bonding. But subtle effects are also present in dynamical situations, in which electron tunneling can be the cause of increased stopping of protons on a hydrogen target at extremely low energies, as discussed next.
\paragraph{Electron hoping induces stopping - }As discussed above, tunneling can be strongly affected by matching energy levels, the appearance of pseudo-levels during the tunneling process (Feshbach resonances), and by energy transfer to the relative motion by coupling to the internal degrees of freedom. Other effects appear when many energy levels are involved. Perhaps the best and clearer examples appear in atomic physics. Stopping power, or the energy loss of a projectile per unit length, $S=- dE/dx$, is an important quantity for experiments at low bombarding energies. The energy at which a nuclear reaction occurs depends on the average energy loss of the projectile in an atomic target. Correcting for the stopping power is thus imperative for low energy experiments. At extremely low projectile energies, only a few phenomena are energetically viable such as the excitation of vibrations (plasmons) in the medium for solid materials, Rutherford scattering and straggling, or charge exchange when one or more electrons are transferred to the projectile.
Stoping by charge exchange in p + H and p + D reactions has been studied in Ref. \cite{BP00}. Because of the low bombarding energy, the electrons adjust themselves quickly and one can use the adiabatic approximation. The potential felt by the electron resembles a symmetric Coulomb barrier around the two atomic centers. As a function of the relative nuclear distance, the electronic energy levels smoothly undergo from hydrogen to helium levels (left side of Figure \ref{phlev}), passing by molecular orbitals at intermediate distances. Expanding the electronic wavefunction as a time admixture of such orbitals, a set of coupled-channel equations is obtained with help of the Hellmann-Feynman relation. As the bombarding energy decreases only the two lower levels, $1s\sigma$ and $2p\sigma$ play a relevant role. The electron jumps back and forth between the two atoms by tunneling through the symmetric Coulomb barrier. The right hand side of Figure \ref{phlev} shows the electron exchange (tunneling) probability as a function of the collision impact parameter in atomic units and for two bombarding energies: (a) 10 KeV, and (b) 100 eV. One notices that at higher energies the tunneling probability increases as the distance decreases mainly due to the decrease of the barrier height and the resonant tunneling effect. When the energy is very low, as seen in the lower panel, the electron jumps frenetically back and forth between the two atoms due to resonant tunneling. At very low energies the exchange probability as a function of impact parameter is given in terms of the simple formula \cite{BP00}
\begin{equation}
P_{exch} = {1\over 2} +{1\over 2} \cos\left\{ {1\over \hbar}\int_{-\infty}^\infty \left[ E_{2p}(t)-E_{1s}(t)\right]dt \right\} . \label{pexch}
\end{equation}
The dashed curve in Figure \ref{phlev} proves that the prediction based on this equation holds very well, specially at very low energies. It is expected to be exact at extremely low energies. The probability minima occur for impact parameters satisfying the relation $\int_{-\infty}^\infty \left[ E_{2p}(t)-E_{1s}(t)\right]dt = 2\pi \hbar (n+1/2)$, a relation more than familiar to all of us. It is the interference between the $1s\sigma$ and the $2p\sigma$ states that induces oscillations in the exchange probability.
\begin{figure*}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.39\textwidth]{phe.pdf}
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \includegraphics[width=0.31\textwidth]{phe2.pdf}
\caption{{\it Left:} Adiabatic energies (1 a.u. of energy = 27.2 eV, 1 a.u. of length = 0.53 \AA) for the electronic orbitals of the (H-He)$^+$ system as a function of the internuclear separation. As the atoms approach each other slowly, curves of same symmetry repel each other. A transition between states s and s' can occur in a slow collision. In a fast collision a diabatic transition, with the states crossing each other, will occur. This is shown in the inset. {\it Right:} Probability of charge exchange in the collision p + $^4$He showing the damped resonant behavior as a function of the impact parameter and for proton energy $E_p = 10$ keV.}
\label{phelev}
\end{figure*}
The case discussed above involves tunneling of only one electron. A more interesting and rather complex situation arises when two electrons are present, as in the case of stopping of protons on a helium gas, as discussed below.
\paragraph{Damping of resonant tunneling - }The case of p + He is more interesting, because of the two active electrons. One can expand the electron wave functions in terms of the two-center basis and obtain a set of time-dependent Hartree-Fock equations \cite{Bert04}. In contrast to the p + H or p + D case the much larger number of levels make a difference. Due to level repulsion, the levels tend to bunch as seen in the left panel of Figure \ref{phelev}. The transition between the lowest levels shows an oscillating behavior due to resonant tunneling between one electron in the ground state of hydrogen and the first excited state of helium. But the oscillations are damped. This is due to the interference between the low-lying states and a bunch of states of average energy $\left< E \right>$ and width $2\Gamma$, as shown on the left side of Figure \ref{phelev}. The damping can understood with the Landau-Zener theory for level crossing. At the crossing there is a probability of an adiabatic transition where $(1-P_{exch})$ given by the Landau-Zener formula
\begin{equation}
P_{exch} = \exp\left[ {2\pi H_{ss'}^2 \over \hbar v d(E_s-E_{s'})/dR} \right] , \label{pexch2}
\end{equation}
where $v$ is the collision velocity, $H_{ss'}$ is the off-diagonal matrix element connecting states $s$ and $s'$ and the term in the denominator is the derivative of the energy difference with respect to the separation distance between the two nuclei.
The interference with the neighboring states introduces a damping in the charge exchange probability,
\begin{equation}
P_{exch} = \cos^2\left( {\left< E \right> b \over 2\hbar v}\right) \exp\left(- {2 \pi \Gamma^2 b \over \hbar v \left< E \right>} \right) ,\label{pexch3}
\end{equation}
where $\left< E\right> \approx 1$ a.u. is the average separation energy between the $0\Sigma$ level and the bunch of higher-energy levels shown in Figure \ref{phelev}. The exponential damping factor agrees with the numerical calculations if one uses $\Gamma = 5$ eV. The exchange probability for the electron drops sharply to zero when the energy of the proton is smaller than 18.7 eV. This is easy to understand because this is the energy necessary for the transition $1s^2(^1S_0) \rightarrow 1s2s(^3S)$ in He. Only when this transition occurs, resonant tunneling will be possible between the ground state in hydrogen and the excited state in helium.
Finally, we consider what happens in tunneling of composite objects through multiple barriers. As an illustrative example, we describe below the case of diffusion and dissociation of molecules in optical lattices. Despite the theoretical simplicity of the system under consideration, the complexity is much larger than in the previous examples and some open questions remain.
\paragraph{Diffusion in optical lattices - }Using standing wave patterns of reflected laser beams optical lattices can be built to study the diffusion of ultracold atoms and molecules \cite{LVL11,DZ08,GF08,Sac08}. Fundamental aspects of diffusion of composite objects, such as molecules, subject to transforming transitions from bound to continuum states can be studied in these optical lattices \cite{BBT12}. In Ref. \cite{BBT12} the confining potential described by the optical lattice potential has been assumed to be a sine function with a periodicity D, equal to half the wavelength of the interfering laser. The Hamiltonian for the molecule is given by $H =T_1 +T_2 +V_1 + V_2 + v$, where $T_i$ is the kinetic energy of atom $i$, $V_i$ is the periodic potential of the lattice and $v$ is the interaction potential between the atoms for a diatomic molecule. A loosely bound, Rydberg-like, system of molecules diffusing through the lattice molecule was studied in Ref. \cite{BBT12}.
\begin{figure*}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.35\textwidth]{diffus.pdf}
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \includegraphics[width=0.51\textwidth]{diffus2.pdf}
\caption{{\it Left:} Lattice diffusion of molecules. The hatched histograms are the relative probabilities of finding a molecule in its ground state at a given position along the lattice. The solid histograms give the relative probabilities of finding individual atoms after the dissociation. The molecules are initially confined in the site at the origin. {\it Right:} Time dependence of the spreading width of bound molecules, $\sigma_M (t )$, shown by the solid line, and of dissociated atoms, $\sigma_A (t )$, shown by the dotted line. The dashed curve is a fit of the asymptotic time dependence with the analytical formula, Eq. (\ref{sigdif}).}
\label{diffuse}
\end{figure*}
The molecules tend to dissociate as they tunnel through the barrier when their binding energy decreases. At very small binding energies, the trend is reversed and the molecule tends to remain intact. As shown in Figure \ref{diffuse}, loosely-bound molecules are resilient to breakup: even at the smallest binding value, the breakup probability is not one. This result is not unusual, as other tunneling systems exhibit similar behavior. This has been proven for the familiar example of tunneling of Cooper pairs \cite{ZF05}. The pair does not usually dissociate as it tunnels through a barrier. However composite particles may dissociate as the particles tunnel through multiple barriers, as in the case of a lattice potential. It takes time for the molecules to dissociate and additional time for the atoms to diffuse after the dissociation. Therefore, the molecules initially confined within one pocket of the lattice will tunnel and diffuse away from the initial position at a speed higher than that of the atoms that are created in the dissociation of the molecules.
In Ref. \cite{BBT12} a diffusion equation for molecules in an optical lattice in terms of the diffusion velocity of the wave packet was given by $\sigma(t)=\sqrt{\left< r^2(t) \right>}$, where $\left< r^2(t)\right>$ is the expectation value of the square of the position of the molecule calculated from the solution of the Schr\"odinger equation. The numerical results show that after a transient time, and for a strongly bound molecule of mass $m$, the approximate result holds,
\begin{equation}
\sigma(t)= C \left( \hbar^2 t \over mb \sigma_0^2 \right)^{1/2}, \label{sigdif}
\end{equation}
where $C$ and $b$ are constants depending on the parameters defining the lattice and $\sigma_0=\sigma(t=0)$. $b$ has the meaning of a ``viscosity" generated by the wiggling potential dependence of the lattice. The linear behavior in Eq. (\ref{sigdif}) is shown by the dashed line in Figure \ref{diffuse} (right). Also shown are the numerical results for the same quantity (solid line), and the diffusion velocity of individual atoms in the lattice (dotted line).
A diffusion coefficient can be defined by $D= (\partial \sigma^2/dt)/2$. Using Eq. (\ref{sigdif}) one gets
\begin{equation}
D= {C\over 2} \left( \hbar^2 \over mb \sigma^2_0 \right). \label{sigdif2}
\end{equation}
This result deviates from the classical Einstein diffusion constant, $D = kT/b$. The effective ``temperature" for this system is the kinetic energy of the initial state, $T \simeq \hbar^2/m\sigma^2(t=0)$. The dependence of the temperature, or diffusion coefficient, on the initial kinetic energy is a result which needs to be verified experimentally. The molecules are assumed not to interact. Therefore these results might not hold when molecules interact in a condensate.
The time dependence of the spreading width of the dissociated atoms within the lattice is not well fitted by any power-law dependence on time, as shown in Figure \ref{diffuse}. The reason for this behavior is not yet understood.
\section{Conclusions}
In this short review I have presented an overview of tunneling of composite objects. I started by giving an example of how one would tackle the problem computationally, followed by an application of the method to the tunneling through a rectangular barrier. It is evident that coupling to open and closed channels lead to a clear resonant behavior visible in the tunneling probabilities.
I went on to discuss a few applications of tunneling of composite objects to real situations, such as molecules passing through thin membranes, cluster-like nuclei tunneling during a nuclear fusion process, and the emission of radiation during tunneling as, e.g., observed during alpha-decay. Other examples were given in atomic physics where tunneling can enhance or suppress the stopping of particles at very low energies. This important process leads to corrections for the energy loss of ions in reactions of astrophysical interest. Finally, the more difficult theoretical treatment of tunneling of composite objects through multiple barriers has been illustrated with the example of molecules diffusing in optical lattices.
Although a (large) number of theoretical works have studied tunneling phenomena in various situations, quantum tunneling of a composite particle in which the particle itself has an internal structure, has yet to be fully clarified.
|
\section{Introduction}
The Kaczmarz algorithm \cite{Kaczmarz:37} is a simple and popular iterative method for solving large-scale overdetermined linear systems.
Given a full-rank measurement matrix $\mA \in \R^{m \times n}$, with $m \geq n$, we wish to recover a signal vector $\vx \in \R^n$ from its measurements $\vy \in \R^m$, given by
\begin{equation}
\vy = \mA \vx.
\label{eq:yeqAx}
\end{equation}
Each row of $\mA$ describes a single linear measurement $y_i = \va_i^T \vx$, and the set of all signals $\vx$ that satisfy that equation is an $(n-1)$-dimensional (affine) subspace in $\R^n$.
The Kaczmarz algorithm begins with an arbitrary initial guess $\vx^{(0)}$, then cycles through all the rows, projecting the iterand $\vx^{(k-1)}$ onto the subspace
$\{\vx \in \R^n : \va_r^T \vx = y_r\}$ to obtain $\vx^{(k)}$, where $r = k \operatorname{mod} m$. Since affine subspaces are convex, this algorithm is a special case of the projection onto convex sets (POCS) algorithm \cite{trussell_signal_1984}.
Due to its simplicity, the Kaczmarz algorithm has been widely used in signal and image processin
. It has long been observed by practitioners that its convergence rate depends on the ordering of the rows
of \mA, and that choosing the row order at random can often lead to faster convergence \cite{herman_algebraic_1993}.
Yet it was only recently that Strohmer and Vershynin first rigorously analyzed the \textit{randomized} Kaczmarz algorithm (RKA) \cite{strohmer_randomized_2009}. They considered a convenient row-selection probability distribution: choosing row $i$ with probability proportional to its squared norm $||\va_i||^2$, and proved the following upper bound on the mean squared error (MSE) of the RKA at the $k$th iteration:
\begin{equation}\label{eq:strohmer_bounds}
\mathbb{E} \, \norm{\vx^{(k)} - \vx}^2 \leq \left(1 - \kappa_{\mA}^{-2}\right)^k \norm{\vx^{(0)} - \vx}^2,
\end{equation}
where $\kappa_{\mA} \bydef \norm{\mA}_F \norm{\mA^{-1}}_2$ is related to the condition number of $\mA$, and $\mA^{-1}$ is its left-inverse.
This bound guarantees that the MSE decays \emph{exponentially} as the RKA iterations proceed.
The work of Strohmer and Vershynin spurred a great deal of interest in RKA and its various extensions (see,~\emph{e.g.},
\cite{censor_note_2009, needell_randomized_2010,Chen:2012fe, zouzias_randomized_2013,needell_paved_2014, Dai:2014, recht_toward_2012}).
In particular, Needell \cite{needell_randomized_2010} derived a bound for the performance of the algorithm when the underlying linear system is inconsistent. In this case, the measurements are
\begin{equation}
\vy = \mA \vx + \veta,
\label{eq:yeqAxpluseta}
\end{equation}
where $\veta$ is an additive noise vector. Needell's bound was later improved by Zouzias and Freris \cite{zouzias_randomized_2013}, who proved the following upper bound on the MSE:
\begin{equation}
\mathbb{E} \, \norm{\vx^{(k)} - \vx}^2 \leq \left(1 - \kappa_{\mA}^{-2}\right)^k \norm{\vx^{(0)} - \vx}^2 + \frac{||\veta||^2}{\sigma^2_{\min}(\mA)},
\label{eq:zf_bound}
\end{equation}
where $\sigma_{\min}(\mA)$ is the smallest singular value of $\mA$. Note that this bound is equal to the original noiseless bound in (\ref{eq:strohmer_bounds}) plus an extra term proportional to the total squared error in the measurements.
In this paper, we provide a complete characterization of the randomized Kaczmarz algorithm for inconsistent linear systems given in \eref{yeqAxpluseta}. We show in \sref{fixed} how to compute the \emph{exact} MSE of the algorithm (averaging over the random choices of the rows) at each iteration. This extends our earlier results derived for the special case when the measurements are noiseless \cite{agaskar_randomized_2014}. A key ingredient of our derivation is a ``lifting trick'', which allows us to analyze the evolution of the MSE (a quadratic quantity) through a much simpler linear recursion embedded in a higher-dimensional ``lifted'' space. We show that existing upper bounds in the literature \cite{needell_randomized_2010, zouzias_randomized_2013} can be easily derived from our exact MSE formula. By setting the number of iterations to infinity, we also provide a closed-form expression for the limiting MSE (\emph{i.e.}, error floor) of the algorithm.
Our MSE analysis in \sref{fixed} is conditioned on the noise, \emph{i.e.}, we assume that $\veta$ in \eref{yeqAxpluseta} is a \emph{fixed} and \emph{deterministic} vector. Thus, the resulting expressions for the MSE and the error floor depend on $\veta$. In practice, the measurement noise $\veta$ is unknown but its elements can often be modeled as zero-mean i.i.d. random variables drawn from some probability distributions (\emph{e.g.}, Gaussian random variables.) We consider this setting in Section \ref{sec:gauss}, where we compute the MSE with the expectations taken over two sources of randomness: the random row-selections made by the algorithm and the noise vector. In this case the final MSE has two terms: one equals to that of the noiseless case we analyzed in\cite{agaskar_randomized_2014} and an extra term proportional to the noise variance.
We demonstrate the accuracy of our exact MSE formulas through numerical simulations reported in \sref{results}. These empirical results also illustrate that previous upper bounds in the literature may be several orders of magnitude too high over the true performance of the algorithm.
\section{Exact Performance Analysis of RKA}
\label{sec:fixed}
\subsection{Overview and Notation}
Consider an inconsistent linear system as in \eref{yeqAxpluseta}. Given the measurement $\vy$ and the matrix $\mA$, the randomized Kaczmarz algorithm seeks to (approximately) reconstruct the unknown signal $\vx$ through iterative projections. The iterand $\vx^{(0)} \in \R^n$ is initialized arbitrarily. At the $k$th step, a row $i_k$ is chosen at random; row $i$ is chosen with probability $p_i$. The update equation is
\begin{equation}
\vx^{(k)} = \vx^{(k-1)} + \frac{y_{i_k} - \va_{i_k}^T\vx^{(k-1)}}{||\va_{i_k}||^2}\va_{i_k},
\label{eq:kacz-itr}
\end{equation}
where $\va_i$ is the $i$th row of $\mA$. The intuition behind the algorithm is simple. In the noiseless case (\emph{i.e.}, when $\veta = \vzero$), each row of $\mA$ and its corresponding entry in $\vy$ defines an affine subspace on which the solution $\vx$ must lie; at each iteration, the RKA algorithm randomly selects one of these subspaces and projects the iterand onto it, getting closer to the true solution with each step.
The row-selection probabilities $p_i$ are tunable parameters of the algorithm. Other authors \cite{strohmer_randomized_2009, needell_randomized_2010, zouzias_randomized_2013} have fixed the probabilities to be $p_i = ||\va_i||^2/||\mA||_F^2$. This is not really a restriction, since the rows of $\mA$ can be scaled arbitrarily and, as long as the measurements are scaled appropriately, the solution and the algorithm's iterations do not change. This particular choice, though, is convenient because it leads to simplified bounds, allowing them to be written in terms of a (modified) condition number of $\mA$. Since most of our expressions are not simplified through this choice, we fix $\mA$ and allow the $p_i$ to be chosen arbitrarily. Our only restriction is that $p_i > 0$ for all $i$ so that every measurement is used.
In \cite{agaskar_randomized_2014}, we computed the exact MSE of the RKA for the special case of consistent linear systems (\emph{i.e.}, the noiseless case.) In what follows, we extend our earlier result and analyze the more general inconsistent case.
\begin{table}
\renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.8}
\centering
\begin{tabular}{l|l||l|l}
Variable & Definition & Variable & Definition\\
\hline
$\tva$ & $\frac{\va}{ \|\va \|}$ &
$\projp{i}$ & $\mI - \tva_i \tva_i^T$
\\
$\teta_i$ & $\frac{\eta_i}{\| \va_i \|}$ &
$\vv^{\otimes 2}$ & $\vv \otimes \vv$
\\
$\PP$ & $\E \projp{i}$ &
$\QQ$ & $\E \projp{i} \otimes \projp{i}$
\\
$\vf$ & $\E \tva_{i} \teta_{i} $ &
$\ve$ & $\E \teta_i^{\hairspace 2} \tva_i \otimes \tva_i$
\\
$\DD$ & $\E \mD_i \teta_i $&
$\mD_i$ & $\tva_i \otimes \projp{i}
+ \projp{i} \otimes \tva_i $
\\
$\vv_2$ & $(\mI - \PP)^{-1} \vf$ &
$\vv_1$ & $(\mI - \QQ)^{-1} \left[ \ve + \DD \vv_2 \right]$
\end{tabular}
\caption{List of important notation and variables.}
\label{tb:var}
\end{table}
\subsection{Exact MSE Analysis Using Lifting}
We consider a given measurement matrix $\mA$ and a fixed noise vector $\veta$.
The exact MSE at iteration step $k$ over the randomness of the algorithm are formulated in this section.
To lighten the notation, we define the normalized $i$th row vector of $\mA$
as $\tva_i \bydef \frac{\va_i}{\| \va_i \|} \in \R^n$ and let $\teta_i \bydef \frac{\eta_i}{\| \va_i \|}$.
These and other important definitions are summarized in Table \ref{tb:var} for the the reader's convenience.
By combining \eqref{eq:kacz-itr} and \eqref{eq:yeqAxpluseta},
the error vector $\vz^{(k)} = \vx^{(k)} - \vx$ can be expressed as
\begin{equation}
\vz^{(k)} = \projp{i_k} \vz^{(k-1)} + \tva_{i_k} \teta_{i_k},
\label{eq:z}
\end{equation}
where $\projp{i} \bydef \mI - \tva_i \tva_i^T$ is the projection onto the $(n-1)$-dimensional subspace orthogonal to the $i$th row $\tva_i$.
Averaging \eqref{eq:z} over the randomness of the algorithm, we get an iterative equation of the mean error vector
\begin{equation}
\E \vz^{(k)} = \PP \, \E \vz^{(k-1)} + \vf,
\label{eq:ez}
\end{equation}
where $\PP \bydef \E \projp{\va_{i}}$ and $\vf \bydef \E\hairspace \tva_{i} \teta_{i}$.
Note that the ease with which we can obtain \eref{ez} from \eref{z} is mainly due to the \emph{linearity} of the original random recursion in \eref{z}. However, the quantity we are interested in, the mean-squared error $\MSE{k}$, is a non-linear (quadratic) term. To compute it, we ``lift'' the problem by treating the covariance matrix $\E \vz^{(k)} (\vz^{(k)})^T$ as an $n^2$-dimensional vector whose dynamics are determined by the algorithm. In the lifted space, the dynamics
are still linear (as we shall soon see), thus allowing for a relatively simple analysis. The MSE can be easily obtained as the trace of $\E \vz^{(k)} (\vz^{(k)})^T$.
Consider the $k$th iteration:
\begin{equation}
\begin{aligned}\label{eq:zzT}
&\vz^{(k)} (\vz^{(k)})^T = \projp{i_k} \vz^{(k-1)} (\vz^{(k-1)})^T \projp{i_k} + \teta_{i_k}^2 \tva_{i_k} \tva_{i_k}^T\\
& \qquad\qquad + \teta_{i_k} \left(\tva_{i_k} (\vz^{(k-1)})^T \projp{i_k} + \projp{i_k} \vz^{(k-1)} \tva_{i_k}^T\right).
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
The linearity of this expression will be clearer if we ``vectorize'' $\vz^{(k)} (\vz^{(k)})^T$ by vertically
concatenating its columns to form a vector $ \opvec\left(\vz^{(k)} (\vz^{(k)})^T\right) \in \R^{n^2}$. In what follows, we will make use of the following matrix identity which holds for any matrices dimensioned so that $\mA \mB \mC$ is well-defined:
\begin{equation}
\opvec(\mA \mB \mC) = (\mC^T \otimes \mA) \opvec(\mB),
\label{eq:veckronidentity}
\end{equation}
where $\otimes$ represents the Kronecker matrix product \cite{horn_topics_1994}. First, we note that
\[
\opvec\left( \vz^{(k)} (\vz^{(k)})^T\right) = \vz^{(k)} \otimes \vz^{(k)} \bydef \vzs{k},
\]
where $\vv^{\otimes 2}$ is introduced as a shorthand notation for the Kronecker product of a vector $\vv$ and itself. Then, we can apply the identity \eqref{eq:veckronidentity} to the
right hand side of \eqref{eq:zzT} to obtain
\[
\begin{aligned}
\vzs{k} & = \left(\projp{i_k} \otimes \projp{i_k}\right) \vzs{k-1} + \teta^2_{i_k} \tva_{i_k}^{\otimes 2}\\
& \qquad + \teta_{i_k} \left( \projp{i_k} \otimes \tva_{i_k} + \tva_{i_k} \otimes \projp{i_k} \right) \vz^{(k-1)}.
\end{aligned}
\]
Taking expectation on both sides of the equation over the randomness of the algorithm, we obtain a simple iterative
formula for the second-moment matrix:
\begin{equation}
\E \vzs{k} = \QQ \, \E \vzs{k-1} + \DD \, \E \vz^{(k-1)} + \ve,
\label{eq:ezz}
\end{equation}
where $\QQ \bydef \E \left(\projp{i} \otimes \projp{i}\right)$,
$\DD \bydef \E \teta_{i} \left( \projp{i} \otimes \tva_{i} + \tva_{i} \otimes \projp{i} \right)$
and $\ve \bydef \E \teta^{\hairspace 2}_{i} \, \tva_{i}^{\otimes 2}$.
We can combine \eqref{eq:ez} and \eqref{eq:ezz} into a single linear recursion
\begin{equation}\label{eq:HH}
\begin{pmatrix}
\E \vzs{k}\\
\E \vz^{(k)}
\end{pmatrix}
=
\mH
\begin{pmatrix}
\E \vzs{k-1} \\
\E \vz^{(k-1)}
\end{pmatrix}
+
\begin{pmatrix}
\ee\\
\ff
\end{pmatrix},
\end{equation}
where
\begin{equation}\label{eq:H_def}
\mH \bydef \HH.
\end{equation}
We thus have the following proposition:
\begin{proposition}\label{prop:MSE}
For a fixed noise vector $\veta$, and an initial error vector $\vz^{(0)}$, the MSE of RKA at the $k$th iteration is given by
\begin{equation}\label{eq:fixed_noise_iteration_MSE}
\MSE{k}= \begin{pmatrix}
\opvec(\mI_{n})\\
\vec{0}_{n}
\end{pmatrix}^{T}
\left[
\mH^{k}
\begin{pmatrix}
\vzs{0} - \vv_{1}\\
\vz(0) - \vv_{2}
\end{pmatrix}
+
\begin{pmatrix}
\vv_1\\
\vv_2
\end{pmatrix}
\right],
\end{equation}
where
$
\vv_2 = (\mI - \PP)^{-1} \vf
$ and
$
\vv_1 = (\mI - \QQ)^{-1} \left[ \ee + \DD \vv_2 \right]
$.
\end{proposition}
\begin{IEEEproof}
We first solve the linear recursion \eref{HH} to get a closed-form expression
\begin{align}
\begin{pmatrix}
\E \vzs{k}\\
\E \vz^{(k)}
\end{pmatrix}
& =
\mH^k
\begin{pmatrix}
\E \vzs{0} \\
\E \vz^{(0)}
\end{pmatrix}
+
\sum_{\ell=0}^{k-1}
\mH^\ell
\begin{pmatrix}
\ee \\
\ff
\end{pmatrix}
\label{eq:solved_H_iteration}
\end{align}
that depends on the initial error $\vz^{(0)}$. Using the identity
$
\sum_{\ell=0}^{k-1}
\mH^\ell
=(\mI-\mH^k)(\mI-\mH)^{-1}
$ and noting that
\[
(\mI - \mH)^{-1} = \begin{pmatrix}
(\mI - \QQ )^{-1} & (\mI - \QQ)^{-1} \DD (\mI - \PP)^{-1} \\
\mat{0} & (\mI - \PP )^{-1}
\end{pmatrix},
\]
we can simplify \eref{solved_H_iteration} and get
\begin{equation}\label{eq:solved_H2}
\begin{pmatrix}
\E \vzs{k}\\
\E \vz^{(k)}
\end{pmatrix}
=
\mH^{k}
\begin{pmatrix}
\vzs{0} - \vv_{1}\\
\vz^{(0)} - \vv_{2}
\end{pmatrix}
+
\begin{pmatrix}
\vv_1\\
\vv_2
\end{pmatrix}.
\end{equation}
Meanwhile, using \eqref{eq:veckronidentity} and the fact that $(A \otimes B)^T = (A^T \otimes B^T)$, the MSE can be expressed
in terms of the vectorized second-moment matrix as
\begin{equation}
\MSE{k} = \opvec({\mI _n})^T \left( \E \vzs{k} \right).
\label{eq:mse-ezz}
\end{equation}
Combining this with \eref{solved_H2} yields the desired result.
\end{IEEEproof}
\subsection{The Limiting MSE}
With the iteration number $k$ going to infinity, the MSE in \eref{fixed_noise_iteration_MSE} will converge to a limiting value (\emph{i.e.}, an error floor) that only depends on the error vector $\veta$. To see this, we first note that both $\mP$ and $\mQ$ are positive semidefinite matrices by their constructions. In fact, one can show that
\[
0 < \lambda_{\max}(\QQ) \le \lambda_{\max}(\mP) < 1,
\]
where $\lambda_{\max}(\cdot)$ is the largest eigenvalue of matrix. Furthermore, one can show that the set of eigenvalues of $\mH $ defined in \eref{H_def} is the union of those of $\mP$ and $\mQ$, and that $\mH$ is a contraction mapping, with $\lim_{k \rightarrow \infty} \mH^k = \vzero$.
This contraction property of $\mH$ implies that the first term in the right-hand side of \eref{fixed_noise_iteration_MSE} vanishes as $k$ goes to infinity. It follows that the limiting MSE can be characterized through $\vv_1$ as follows.
\begin{proposition}
The limiting MSE is given by
\begin{align}
\MSE{\infty} = \tr \opmat(\vv_1),
\label{eq:mse-infty}
\end{align}
where the $\opmat$ operator undoes the $\opvec$ operator to produce an $n \times n$ matrix from an $n^2$-dimensional vector.
\end{proposition}
Due to the space limit, we omit the proof of these assertions, which involve elementary matrix analysis and will be presented in a follow-up paper.
\subsection{Previous Upper Bounds on the MSE}
\label{subsec:previousbounds}
The existing bounds on noisy Kaczmarz performance \cite{needell_randomized_2010,zouzias_randomized_2013} can be recovered via our formulation.
From \eqref{eq:HH}, we have
\begin{equation}\label{eq:recursion_MSE}
\begin{aligned}
\MSE{k} & = \opvec(\mI)^T \QQ \opvec\left(\E \vz^{(k-1)} (\vz^{(k-1)})^T\right) \\
& \quad\qquad + \opvec(\mI)^T \DD \, \E \vz^{(k-1)} + \opvec(\mI)^T \ee.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
Using the definition of $\mQ$, we have
\begin{align}
\opvec(\mI)^T \QQ &=\left(\sum_i p_i (\projp{i} \otimes \projp{i}) \opvec(\mI)\right)^T\nonumber\\
&=\opvec(\sum_i p_i \projp{i} \projp{i})^T\nonumber\\
&=\opvec(\mP)^T,\nonumber
\end{align}
where the second equality can be obtained from the identity \eref{veckronidentity} and the last equality follows from $\projp{i}$ being an idempotent matrix and from the definition of $\mP$. It follows that the first term on the right-hand side of \eref{recursion_MSE} can be bounded as follows:
\[
\begin{aligned}
&\opvec(\mI)^T \QQ \opvec\left(\E \vz^{(k-1)} \vz^{(k-1)T}\right)\\
&\quad\qquad =\opvec(\mP)^T \opvec\left(\E \vz^{(k-1)} \vz^{(k-1)T}\right)\nonumber \\
& \quad\qquad = \E \vz^{(k-1)T} \PP \vz^{(k-1)} \leq \lambda_{\max}(\PP) \E ||\vz^{(k-1)}||^2. \nonumber
\end{aligned}
\]
The second term on the right-hand side of \eref{recursion_MSE} is $0$, since
\[
\DD^T \opvec(\mI) = \sum_i p_i \teta_i \left[\opvec(\projp{i} \tva_i) + \opvec(\tva_i^T \projp{i}) \right] = \vec{0}.
\]
The third term is given by
\[
\opvec(\mI)^T \ve = \opvec(\mI)^T \sum_i p_i \teta_i^{\hairspace 2} \hairspace \tva_i^{\otimes 2} = \sum_i p_i \teta_i^{\hairspace 2}.
\]
So, all together, we have
\[
\MSE{k} \leq \lambda_{\max}(\mP) \MSE{k-1} + \sum_i p_i \teta_i^2.
\]
Applying this inequality recursively gives us a bound equivalent to that in Zouzias and Freris \cite{zouzias_randomized_2013}:
\begin{align}
\MSE{k}
\leq \lmax^k(\PP) \MSE{0} + \frac{\sum_i p_i \teta_i^2}{1-\lmax(\PP)}.
\label{eq:bnzf}
\end{align}
\begin{remark}
In Section \ref{sec:results}, our simulation results will illustrate that this upper bound may be several orders of magnitude too high than the true performance of the algorithm.
\end{remark}
\section{Average over the noise}
\label{sec:gauss}
Our exact MSE expression given in Proposition~\ref{prop:MSE} depends on the noise vector $\veta$. In practice, of course, $\veta$ is unknown, but we may have information about its statistics. In this section, we suppose that $\veta$ is drawn from a probability distribution: in particular, we assume that its elements $\eta_i$ are i.i.d. random variables with zero-mean and variance $\sigma^2$. Here, it is important to differentiate between two sources of randomness: the random row-selections made by the algorithm and the random vector $\veta$. In what follows, $\E$ is understood as the conditional expectation operator over the randomness of the algorithm, with $\veta$ fixed, and we define $\En$ as the average over the noise.
It is convenient to
rewrite \eqref{eq:fixed_noise_iteration_MSE} as
\begin{equation}\label{eq:mse-s}
\begin{aligned}
\MSE{k}&=
\opvec(\mI_{n})^T
\left[
\QQ^k \left( \vzs{0}-\vv_{1} \right)
\right.\\
&\;\;
\left.
\quad+
f_k (\DD) \left( \vz^{(0)}-\vv_{2} \right)
\right]
+\tr \opmat(\vv_1)
\;,
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
where
\begin{align}
f_k(\DD)=\sum_{0 \le \ell < k} \QQ^\ell \DD \PP^{k-1-\ell}.
\label{eq:fk}
\end{align}
Since $f_k(\DD)$ is a linear function, we have $\En f_k(\DD) = f_k(\En \DD) = 0$.
Averaging \eqref{eq:mse-s} over the noise, we get the following proposition.
\begin{figure*}
\centering
\subfigure[]{
\label{fig:gaussian_matrix1_results}
\input{figs/fig_gaussian_matrix1_results.tikz}
}
\hspace{2em}
\subfigure[]{
\label{fig:tomography_matrix1_results}
\input{figs/fig_tomography_matrix1_results.tikz}
}
\caption{(a) The mean squared error $\E||\vx^{(k)} - \vx||^2$ is shown on a logarithmic scale as a function of the iteration number $k$.
The matrix $\mA$ has Gaussian entries,
and the error vector $\eta$ is fixed in advance, with $||\eta||^2 = 1.6$.
The average results from 1007 trials are shown as the blue curve, and the results from 150 of the trials are
shown in gray. The analytical expression
(\ref{eq:fixed_noise_iteration_MSE}) is shown as a dashed green line, and clearly matches the simulation results quite well.
The Needell \cite{needell_paved_2014} and Zouzias-Freris \cite{zouzias_randomized_2013} bounds are shown as well, and are far higher
than the true MSE.
(b) The mean square error $\En \E ||\vx^{(k)} - \vx||^2$ averaged over both the algorithm's randomness and the noise is
shown on a logarithmic scale as a function of the iteration number $k$. The matrix $\mA$ is the measurement matrix of a tomographic
system (generated by the AIR Tools package \cite{hansen_air_2012}), and the error vector $\veta$ is a zero mean Gaussian vector with variance
$2.25 \times 10^{-4}$, drawn independently with each trial. The average of 1007 trials
are shown in blue along with the results from 150 of the trials in gray. The analytical expression for
the Gaussian noise case (\ref{eq:mse-avg-noise}) clearly matches the simulation results. The noise-averaged Zouzias-Freris bound
is shown as well for comparison.
}
\label{fig:results}
\end{figure*}
\begin{proposition}
The MSE of RKA at the $k$th iteration averaged over both the randomness of the algorithm and noise is
\begin{equation}\label{eq:mse-avg-noise}
\begin{aligned}
\En \MSE{k}
&=
\opvec(\mI_{n})^T
\left[
\QQ^k \left( \vzs{0} - \En \vv_{1} \right)
\right. \\
&\;\;\;\;
\left.
\quad\quad- \En f_k (\DD) \vv_{2}
\right] +\tr \opmat(\En \vv_1).
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
\end{proposition}
This formula involves two noise-related quantities,
$\En \vv_1$ and
$\En f_k (\DD) \vv_2 $,
both of which are second-order in the noise. This shows that our knowledge of the second-order statistics of the noise is sufficient to compute them.
In particular, the first term is given by
\[
\En \vv_1 = \sigma^2 (\mI - \QQ) ^{-1}
\left[
\sum_{i}p_i
\frac{\tva_i^{ \otimes 2}}{||\va_i||^2}
+ g\left( (\mI-\mP)^{-1} \right)
\right],
\]
where we define the matrix function
\begin{equation}
g(\mM) = \sum_i \frac{p_i^2}{||\va_i||^2} \left( \tva_i \otimes \projp{i} + \projp{i} \otimes \tva_i \right) \mM \tva_i.
\end{equation}
(In these expressions the extra factors of $||\va_i||^2$ are not erroneous---they account for the varying signal-to-noise ratio of the measurements.)
The second noise-related term is computed by
\[
\begin{aligned}
\En f_k (\DD) \vv_{2}
&=\sum_{0 \le \ell < k} \QQ^\ell \hairspace \En \DD \PP^{k-1-\ell} (\mI - \PP)^{-1} \vf
\\
&= \sigma^2 \sum_{0 \le \ell < k} \QQ^\ell \hairspace \En g( \PP^{k-1-\ell} (\mI - \PP)^{-1}).
\end{aligned}
\]
\begin{remark}
The first term on the right-hand side of \eqref{eq:mse-avg-noise} decays exponentially because $\lambda_{\max}(\mQ) < 1$. Thus, the limiting MSE averaged over both the randomness of the algorithm and noise is $\En \MSE{\infty} = \tr \opmat(\En \vv_1)$.
\end{remark}
\section{Experimental Results}
\label{sec:results}
We verified our results with numerical simulations. We took care in our implementations of the matrices $\QQ$ and $\DD$ in order to minimize
the time- and space-complexity. $\QQ$ is an $n^2 \times n^2$ matrix, which in a naive implementation would require $O(n^4)$ storage and
$O(n^4)$ computation to multiply by a vector. Instead, we use the fact that
\begin{equation}
\QQ \vx = \opvec \left(\sum_i p_i \projp{i} \opmat(\vx) \projp{i} \right)
\end{equation}
to implement multiplication by $\QQ$ with no additional storage in time $O(m n^2)$ [since $\projp{i}$ can be
multiplied by other matrices in time $O(n^2)]$. Meanwhile, we use the fact that
\begin{equation}
\DD \vx = \opvec \left( \sum_i \frac{p_i \veta_i}{||\va_i||^2} (\projp{i}\vx\va_i^T + \va_i \vx^T \projp{i}) \right)
\end{equation}
to implement $\DD$ without any additional storage. This saves no computation, since it takes $O(m n^2)$ time.
For the noise-averaged formula \eqref{eq:mse-avg-noise},
we can use the structure of $\QQ$ to compute the complex term $\En f_k (\DD) \vv_{2}$ in $O(kmn^2)$ time.
Alternatively, we could use an eigenvector decomposition of $\mP$ and $\mQ$ to compute
it in a time constant in $k$: we must use $O(n^4)$ space and $O(m n^4)$ time. This would
make sense if we wanted to compute the MSE for a single, moderately large $k$.
The results of two experiments are shown in this paper.
First, we tested the fixed noise formula (\ref{eq:fixed_noise_iteration_MSE}). We drew a single noise vector $\veta$ with $||\veta||^2 = 1.6$,
and a starting error $\vz^{(0)}$,
and choose a $150 \times 50$ measurement matrix $\mA$ that had i.i.d. Gaussian entries. Then we ran 1007 separate
trials of the randomized Kaczmarz algorithm, with each trial running for 2000 iterations and starting with an error vector $\vz^{(0)}$.
We plotted the average MSE of the trials at each iteration on a log scale. The results are shown in Figure \ref{fig:gaussian_matrix1_results},
and show that the expression we derived in (\ref{eq:fixed_noise_iteration_MSE}) matches the numerical results very well.
We also plotted existing bounds \cite{needell_randomized_2010,zouzias_randomized_2013}
as well. The bounds are significantly higher than the true MSE.
Next, we tested the noise-averaged formula (\ref{eq:mse-avg-noise}). We used the AIR Tools package in MATLAB \cite{hansen_air_2012} to
generate a tomography measurement matrix $\mA$ of size $148 \times 100$. The noise vector $\veta$ had i.i.d.~entries with variance
$\sigma^2 = 2.25\times10^{-4}$ and was drawn independently for each trial. We ran 1007 separate trials of the randomized Kaczmarz algorithm,
with each trial running for 3000 iterations. The results are shown in Figure \ref{fig:tomography_matrix1_results}. The close match between empirical
and theoretical curves verify our expression for the noise-averaged MSE (\ref{eq:mse-avg-noise}). The graph also shows that
the noise-averaged version of the Zouzias-Freris bound is more than two orders of magnitude higher than the true limiting MSE in this case.
\section{Conclusions}
\label{sec:conclusion}
We provided a complete characterization of the randomized Kaczmarz algorithm when applied to inconsistent linear systems. We developed an exact
formula for the MSE of the algorithm when the measurement vector is corrupted by a fixed noise vector. We also showed how to average this expression
over a noise distribution with known first and second-order moments. We described efficient numerical implementations of these expressions that limit the time- and space-complexity. Simulations show that the exact MSE expressions we derived have excellent matches with the numerical results. Moreover, our experiments indicate that existing upper bounds on the MSE may be loose by several orders of magnitude.
\providecommand{\url}[1]{}
\renewcommand{\url}[1]{}
\bibliographystyle{IEEEtran}
|
\section{Introduction}
\label{intro}
While a large body of work has accumulated over many decades on the physics of crystal defects~\cite{Baluffi}, the microscopic causes of defect nucleation and yielding in solids remain active areas of recent research~\cite{schall-nat,PNAS}. A small external stress on a crystalline solid at non-zero temperatures affects atomic configurations in two ways: (1) an affine deformation characterised by the elastic strain and (2) a modification of the relative probabilities of thermally excited lattice defects~\cite{MTE,CL,SS1}. Within a linear response picture~\cite{CL} local strain fluctuations measured from particle coordinates determine the elastic moduli of the solid, which in turn govern the magnitude of the affine response~\cite{SS1,zahn,zhang,harm-colloid,kers1}. It is therefore natural to ask the complementary question viz.\ fluctuations of which quantity, derivable {\it solely} from the configuration of the atoms, measure the susceptibility of a crystalline solid to creation of defects? In this paper, we pursue this issue by extending and generalising an approach introduced in~\cite{sassy} based on coarse-graining of atomic displacements. Soft, precursor fluctuations which give rise to defects appear as a natural outcome of this coarse-graining process. We explore some of the interesting consequences of this connection -- such as the ability to engineer equilibrium defect concentrations, at least in a colloidal crystal~\cite{colloids}, by subtly altering the statistical weights of these precursors using dynamic light fields~\cite{HOT}.
Consider a system consisting of $i = 1 \dots N$ particles with instantaneous positions $\{{\bf r}\}$ vibrating about a set of reference coordinates $\{{\bf R}\}$. To begin, we first elevate a measure of non-affinity
introduced in~\cite{falk} to identify elastic heterogeneities in sheared amorphous solids, to the role of a fully-fledged thermodynamic, collective coordinate. This variable, {\color{black} $X = N^{-1}\sum_{i=1}^{N} \chi({\bf R}_{i})$}, a scalar functional of both the instantaneous and the reference coordinates, measures the magnitude of non-elastic deviations of the positions of all particles away from their reference configuration coarse-grained over a reference volume $\Omega$. {\color{black}The local $\chi({\bf R}_{i})$ is a function of the instantaneous and reference positions ${\bf r}$ and ${\bf R}$ of the particles in the neighborhood $\Omega$ of a given particle $i$ with reference particle position ${\bf R}_{i}$}. We had earlier obtained the equilibrium statistics of {\color{black} of $\chi$ (spatial dependence suppressed for brevity)}, in crystals~\cite{sassy} at finite temperatures. We had shown that under an external stress ${\bf \Sigma}$, particles undergo both affine and non-affine deviations, with {\color{black}$\chi$} always increasing as ${\bf \Sigma}^2$ within the harmonic approximation.
Here, we first extend the work reported in~\cite{sassy} to {\it time-dependent} correlation functions for {\color{black}$\chi$} and strains at zero stress. This part of our treatment is similar in spirit to that of~\cite{vine} where the dynamical {\em density} correlations are analysed in terms of a sum over harmonic degrees of freedom. The relaxation time of an observable arises, within this approximation, from the de-phasing of incoherent harmonic oscillations. While our treatment is perfectly general and is applicable to any solid in any dimension for which $\{{\bf R}\}$ and the interactions
are known, we present results for the two dimensional triangular lattice. Next, an analysis of the vibrational modes contributing to non-affine distortions of $\Omega$ reveals that most of {\color{black}$\chi$} arises from two degenerate non-affine displacements which tend to replace four $6$ coordinated particles with two pairs of particles with $5$ and $7$ neighbours: an incipient, or precursor, dislocation-anti-dislocation pair. Having obtained time dependent correlation functions of {\color{black}$\chi$}, we identify a field, $h_X$, thermodynamically conjugate to the global non-affinity parameter $X$ and argue that the response of the solid to an application of this field would change the magnitude of $X$ (and {\color{black}$\chi$}) and hence the probability of these localised precursor fluctuations that give rise to dislocation pairs. Since $h_X$ couples linearly, {\color{black}$X$} can both increase or decrease depending on the sign of $h_X$. Further, unlike stress, $h_X$ changes defect probabilities directly {\it without} introducing affine strains and associated spatial anisotropies, simplifying the study of their statics and dynamics. Finally, since {\color{black}$X$} is given entirely in terms of the particle coordinates and the $\{{\bf R}\}$ which appear as constant parameters, $h_X$ can be directly introduced into the Hamiltonian and the dynamics of system calculated using standard molecular dynamics~\cite{UMS}. For a colloidal solid, it is even possible to apply $h_X$ in the laboratory using laser tweezers~\cite{HOT, tweeze}, a point that we elaborate later. We explore the effect of $h_X$ on the equilibrium statistics and dynamics of {\color{black}$X$(and $\chi$)} and of the individual defect precursor modes.
Before we end this introduction, we mention an aspect of our work that makes it relevant to some recent studies of the mechanical response of soft amorphous solids~\cite{cates-evans} and glasses~\cite{falk-review}. In such solids, it is impossible to define the kinds of defect configurations encountered in crystals such as vacancies, dislocations, stacking faults or grain boundaries~\cite{rob}. However, given any reference configuration and a set of particle coordinates, $\chi$ and much of everything else discussed in our work can still be defined and computed. The precursor modes in this case should be related to non-affine droplet fluctuations, which have been extensively studied in recent years~\cite{argon,falk,quad,lemat, barat, zero-T, itamar, schall, schall1, schall2}. Unlike crystals, however, the identification of defect precursors with actual defects is much more problematic for amorphous solids due to the lack of a simple and unique reference $\{{\bf R}\}$ and is, therefore, a subject of ongoing lively debate~\cite{manning1,manning2,itamar2}. We hope that some of the ideas discussed here may be useful in illuminating this issue. We return to a discussion of this point briefly later.
The rest of the paper is organised as follows. In section~\ref{sec:1} we set up the calculation and define the coarse-graining process used to calculate spatio-temporal correlation functions. Parts of this calculation have previously appeared in~\cite{sassy}, but we include the relevant aspects here for completeness and to make the paper self-contained. In ~\ref{sec:2} we present our results for the time dependent $\chi$ and strain fluctuations in the two-dimensional triangular lattice. In ~\ref{sec:3} we identify defect precursors and obtain their statistics. We also introduce the non-affine field $h_X$ and study its effect on these precursor fluctuations. In section~\ref{sec:4} we suggest how $h_X$ may be produced in the laboratory using laser tweezers~\cite{HOT}. We discuss our results and conclude by giving indications of future directions in section~\ref{sec:5}.
\section{Coarse graining and dynamic correlation functions}
\label{sec:1}
On application of an external stress or as a result of thermal fluctuations, particles $i$ within a solid undergo displacements ${\bf u}_{i} = {\bf r}_{i}-{\bf R}_{i}$ away from some chosen reference configuration ${\bf R}_{i}$ to their displaced positions ${\bf r}_{i}$. In a homogeneous solid at vanishing temperature, such displacements are affine, implying that they can be expressed as ${\bf u}_{i} = \mathsf{D}{\bf R}_{i}$, where $\mathsf{D} = \mathsf{K}^{-1}\bf{\Sigma}$ is the deformation tensor related to the external stress $\bf{\Sigma}$ via the tensor of elastic constants $\mathsf{K}$. To derive the closest approximation to this simple zero temperature scenario in the presence of thermal fluctuations we proceed as follows \cite{sassy}.
Consider a neighbourhood, $\Omega$, larger than the unit cell, around a central particle labelled $0$
consisting of $N_\Omega$ particles $i$ within a cut-off distance $R_\Omega$ in a $d$ dimensional lattice. The reference, zero temperature lattice configurations are labelled by ${\bf R}_{i = 0\dots N_\Omega}$ while the fluctuating atom positions are ${\bf r}_{i = 0\dots N_\Omega}$. The particle displacements are then {\color{black} as before} ${\bf u}_i = {\bf r}_{i} - {\bf R}_{i}$. Now define relative displacements, ${\bf \Delta}_{i} = {\bf u}_i-{\bf u}_0 = {\bf r}_{i} - {\bf r}_{0} -({\bf R}_{i} - {\bf R}_{0})$ of particle $i$ compared to particle $0$. The ``best fit'' \cite{falk} coarse-grained local deformation tensor ${\mathsf D}$ is the one that minimizes $\sum_i
[{\bf \Delta}_{i} - {\mathsf D}({\bf R}_{i} - {\bf R}_{0})]^2$ with the non-affinity parameter $\chi$ being the (positive definite) minimum value of this quantity.
In~\cite{sassy} we showed that the result of this minimisation procedure may be expressed as a projection of the particle displacements ${\bf \Delta}_i$ into mutually orthogonal subspaces as defined by two projection operators ${\mathsf P}$ and ${\mathsf R}{\mathsf Q}$.
In terms of these,
$\chi= {\bf \Delta}^{\rm T}{\mathsf P}{\bf \Delta}$ while
the elements of the affine deformation tensor (strains and local rotation), ${\mathsf
D}_{\alpha\gamma}$, arranged as a linear array ${\bf e} =
(D_{11}, D_{12}, \dots , D_{1d}, D_{21}, \dots , D_{dd})$, are given by ${\bf e} = {\mathsf Q}{\bf \Delta}$. Here
${\bf \Delta}$ is a column vector with $Nd$ elements containing the components of {\color{black} the} ${\bf \Delta}_i$.
The projectors are given explicitly by
${\mathsf R}{\mathsf Q}
= {\mathsf R}({\mathsf R}^{\rm T}{\mathsf R})^{-1}{\mathsf R}^{\rm T}$
and
${\mathsf P} = {\mathsf I}-{\mathsf R}{\mathsf Q}$.
As in~\cite{sassy}, the $Nd\times d^{2}$ matrix ${\mathsf R}$ appearing here has elements ${\mathsf
R}_{i\alpha,\gamma\gamma^{\prime}} =
\delta_{\alpha\gamma}(R_{i\gamma^{\prime}}-R_{0\gamma^{\prime}})$
where the $R_{i\gamma^{\prime}}$ and $R_{0,\gamma^{\prime}}$ are the
components of the lattice positions ${\bf R}_{i}$ and ${\bf R}_{0}$,
respectively. Now define the correlation matrix $\mathsf C$ with elements, $C_{i\alpha,j\gamma} = \langle \Delta_{i\alpha} \Delta_{j\gamma} \rangle$ where the angular brackets $\langle \dots \rangle$ indicate an average over the equilibrium ensemble. One can {\color{black}then} easily obtain the statistics of $\chi$ and ${\bf e}$ in terms of $\mathsf C$. For example the probability distribution for the affine distortions ${\bf e}$ is a $d^2$
dimensional Gaussian with zero mean and co-variance matrix ${\mathsf Q}{\mathsf C}{\mathsf Q}^{\rm T}$ whose elements are proportional to the elastic moduli. On the other hand, $\chi$ is distributed as the sum of the squares of $N_\Omega d-d^2$ independent Gaussian random variables with variances given by the eigenvalues of ${\mathsf P}{\mathsf C}{\mathsf P}$. A comparison of the projected atomic displacements, i.e.\ eigenvectors of ${\mathsf P}{\mathsf C}{\mathsf P}$ and $(1-{\mathsf P}){\mathsf C} (1 - {\mathsf P})$, that give rise to the $\chi$ and $\bf e$ shows that while the latter consist of local volume, uniaxial and shear distortions of $\Omega$ together with local rotations, non-affine displacements, which contribute to $\chi$, correspond to small wavelength distortions of particles {\it within} $\Omega$. Application of an external stress, ${\bf \Sigma}$, shifts the strain probability distributions to non-zero mean strain in accordance with Hooke's law and fluctuation response relations but does not affect $\chi$ to linear order. The lowest order variation of $\chi$ with ${\bf \Sigma}$ is given by $
\langle\chi\rangle_{{\bf \Sigma}}=\langle\chi\rangle_{{\bf \Sigma}=0} + {\bf \Sigma}^{\rm T}{\mathsf Q}{\mathsf C}[{\mathsf P},{\mathsf C}]{\mathsf Q}^{\rm T}{\bf \Sigma}$, where $[{\mathsf P},{\mathsf C}]$ is a commutator.
In order to calculate the spatio-temporal correlation functions of the non-affinity $\chi$ and strains
${\bf e}$, we need to consider simultaneously
displacement differences in two neighborhoods $\Omega$ and $\bar{\Omega}$ centered on
lattice positions ${\bf R}_0$ and $\bar{{\bf R}}_0$ at time $t$ and $t^{\prime}$ respectively.
The vector
${\bf \Delta}(t)$ is defined as the displacement corresponding to the reference lattice position ${\bf R}_0$ at time $t$, with an analogous definition for
$\bar {\bf \Delta}(t^{\prime})$. The local
affine strain ${\bf e}({\bf R}_0,t) = {\mathsf Q} {\bf \Delta}(t)$ and non-affinity
$\chi({\bf R}_0,t) = {\bf \Delta}^{\rm T} (t){\mathsf P}{\bf \Delta}(t)$ are defined as before. For time $t^{\prime}$ and position $\bar{{\bf R}}_0$ we have the corresponding quantities ${\bf e}(\bar{{\bf R}}_0,t^{\prime}) = {\mathsf Q}\bar {\bf \Delta}(t^\prime)$ and $\chi(\bar{{\bf R}}_0,t^{\prime}) = \bar{\bf \Delta}^{\rm T} (t^\prime){\mathsf P}\bar{\bf \Delta}(t^\prime)$. The covariances may now be defined as
\begin{eqnarray}
C_{i\alpha,j\gamma}&=&\langle \Delta_{i\alpha}(t)\Delta_{j\gamma}(t)\rangle
= \langle \Delta_{i\alpha}(0)\Delta_{j\gamma}(0)\rangle, \nonumber \\
\bar{\bar{C}}_{i\alpha,j\gamma}&=&\langle \bar \Delta(t^{\prime})_{i\alpha}
\bar \Delta(t^{\prime})_{j\gamma}\rangle
= \langle \bar \Delta(0)_{i\alpha}
\bar \Delta(0)_{j\gamma}\rangle\nonumber \\
\bar {C}_{i\alpha,j\gamma}&=&\langle \Delta(t)_{i\alpha}
\bar \Delta(t^{\prime})_{j\gamma}\rangle.
\label{cmat}
\end{eqnarray}
Obviously the first two averages are identical and reduce to the space and time independent second-order moments $\langle {\bf \Delta}{\bf \Delta}^{\rm T} \rangle$~\cite{sassy}; the third quantity yields the required correlation functions.
To derive the expressions for the time-dependent strain and non-affinity auto-correlation functions we use their definitions in terms of the relative displacement projections. We obtain, therefore,
\begin{eqnarray}
C_{\bf e}({\bf R}_0,t,\bar{{\bf R}}_0,t^{\prime}) & = & \langle {\bf e}({\bf R}_0,t) {\bf e}^{\rm T}(\bar{{\bf R}}_0,t^{\prime})\rangle \nonumber \\
& = &\langle {\mathsf Q} {\bf \Delta}(t) \bar {\bf \Delta}^{\rm T}(t^{\prime}) {\mathsf Q}^{\rm T} \rangle \nonumber \\
& = & {\mathsf Q} \bar {\mathsf C} {\mathsf Q}^{\rm T}.
\label{ep}
\end{eqnarray}
The correlation functions between any pair of affine {\color{black}strains} may now be obtained by taking appropriate linear combinations of the elements of $C_{\bf e}$. In the next section we focus on one such component, viz, the shear strain $\epsilon$.
Similarly, the correlation between $\chi({\bf R}_0,t)$ and $\chi(\bar{{\bf R}}_0,t^{\prime})$ can be calculated using Wick's theorem as
\begin{eqnarray}
C_{\chi}({\bf R}_0,t,\bar{{\bf R}}_0,t^{\prime}) & = & \langle \chi({\bf R}_0,t)\chi(\bar{{\bf R}}_0,t^{\prime})\rangle - \langle\chi\rangle^2\nonumber\\
& = &2\,{\rm Tr} ({\mathsf P}\bar {\mathsf C}{\mathsf P})
({\mathsf P}\bar{\mathsf C}{\mathsf P})^{\rm T} = 2\sum_j\bar{\sigma}_{j}^{2}
\label{chi}
\end{eqnarray}
where, in the final equation, the $\bar{\sigma}_{j}^2$
denote the $N_\Omega\,d - d^2$ non-zero eigenvalues of the matrix $({\mathsf P}\bar{\mathsf C}{\mathsf P})
({\mathsf P}\bar{\mathsf C}{\mathsf P})^{\rm T}$.
Of course, in a homogeneous solid in equilibrium, these correlation functions are functions only of the relative coordinates ${\bf R}_0 - \bar{\bf R}_0$ and times $t - t^{\prime}$. We will denote these simply by ${\bf R}$ and $t$ in what follows.
Note that so far we have not made any assumptions about the structure and interactions of the particles $i$ and all our results apply equally well for any system in any dimension as long as a well defined reference configuration $\{ {\bf R} \}$ exists. Indeed, we believe that a fair fraction of our results should apply even to {\em amorphous} solids with displacements being measured from a set of particle coordinates obtained from a zero temperature energy minimisation. To obtain analytic results we need to evaluate the covariances and for the rest of this paper we specialise to periodic lattices of particles, whose interactions we may approximate as being {\em harmonic}. Alternately, the covariance matrix may also be obtained experimentally~\cite{harm-colloid} in the case of colloidal solids using video microscopy without any {\em a priori} assumption concerning the form of the interactions. One may directly measure
$\langle {\bf u}_{\bf q} {\bf u}_{-{\bf q'}}^{\rm T} \rangle = \tilde{\mathcal D}^{-1}({\bf q}) \,v_{\rm BZ}\delta({\bf q}-{\bf q'})$, where $\tilde{\mathcal D}({\bf q})$ is the dynamical matrix, and $v_{\rm BZ}$ the volume of the Brillouin zone. Given the dynamical matrix, $\bar{C}_{i\alpha,j\gamma}$ may be evaluated as follows. We substitute
for the relative displacements their expansion in terms of the vibrational modes of the lattice viz., ${\bf \Delta}_i (t) = {\bf u}_i - {\bf u}_0 = l\, v_{\rm BZ}^{-1} \sum_s \int d{\bf q}\, {\bf u}_{\bf q}^{\rm T} {\bf a}_s({\bf q}){\bf a}_s({\bf q}) (e^{i {\bf q \cdot R}_{i}} - e^{i {\bf q \cdot R}_0})\cos[\omega_{s}({\bf q})t] $, {\color{black}into} the third of the equations~(\ref{cmat}) to obtain,
\begin{eqnarray}
\bar{C}_{i\alpha,j\gamma}&=&\frac{l^{2}}{v_{BZ}}\sum_s\int\,d{\bf q}\, {\color{black}\,a_{s\alpha}}({\bf q}) {\color{black}\,a_{s\gamma}}({\bf q})\frac{\cos[\omega_{s}({\bf q})t]}{\omega^{2}_s({\bf q})} \times \nonumber \\
& & (e^{i {\bf q \cdot R}_{i}}-e^{i {\bf q \cdot R}_{0}}) (e^{-i {\bf q \cdot \bar{R}}_j}-e^{-i {\bf q \cdot \bar{R}}_{0}}).
\label{MATC}
\end{eqnarray}
In the above expressions $l$ is the lattice parameter and ${\color{black}{\bf a}}_{s}({\bf q})$ and $\omega_{s}({\bf q})$ are the eigenvectors and eigenvalues (phonon frequencies) respectively of the dynamical matrix corresponding to the $s^{\rm th}$ phonon branch. The ${\bf q}$--space integrals are over the Brillouin zone.
\section{Results for the 2d triangular crystal}
\label{sec:2}
The formulation for the spatio-temporal correlation functions given in the previous section (section~\ref{sec:1}) is applicable for any periodic crystal as long as the dynamical matrix $\tilde{\mathcal D}_{\alpha\gamma}$ is known. In this section we present our results for the simple but important case of a triangular network of particles connected by harmonic springs defined by the Hamiltonian,
\begin{equation}
H_{harm} = \sum_{i} \frac{{\bf p}_i^2}{2 m} + \frac{K}{2} \sum_{(ij)} [({\bf u}_i - {\bf u}_j)\cdot {\hat {\bf R}_{ij}}]^2,
\label{harm}
\end{equation}
where ${\bf u}_i$, ${\bf p}_i$ and $m$ are displacement, {\color{black}momentum} and mass of the particle $i$ respectively, and the unit vector ${\hat {\bf R}_{ij}}$ points from particle $i$ to $j$ in the reference configuration. The sum in the second term in (\ref{harm}) runs over all bonds in the network, each with spring constant $K$. The unit of distance will be the lattice parameter from now on while time will be measured in units of $\sqrt{m/K}$. The temperature may also be rescaled to unity without loss of generality. Because of its simplicity, the harmonic triangular net has been studied extensively and is known to be a good approximation for many real crystalline solids in two dimensions~\cite{zahn,kers1,zhang,harm-colloid}. The dynamical matrix and hence the dispersion relation $\omega({\bf q})$ for this system is also known~\cite{harmdyn}; for small ${\bf q}$ it is given by $\omega_{s = T,L} = c_{s = T, L} |{\bf q}|$ with the transverse and longitudinal sound velocities $c_T = \frac{1}{2}\sqrt{\frac{3 K}{2}}$ and $c_L = \frac{3}{2}\sqrt{\frac{K}{2}}$. We consider a coarse-graining volume $\Omega$ consisting of a central atom and its $N_\Omega = 6$ nearest neighbours in the triangular lattice~\cite{sassy}.
\begin{figure}[ht]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width = 6.0cm]{Fig-TC-1.pdf}
\end{center}
\caption{(a) $C_{\chi}(0,t)$ from computation (line) compared with
that obtained from molecular dynamics simulations (points) of a
$500\times500$ site harmonic lattice with unit particle masses. Note that the error bars are smaller than the size of the symbols. (b) Plot of $C_{\epsilon}(0,t)$ for the same system as in (a).
}
\label{corrt}
\end{figure}
The normalised
correlation functions for $\chi$ and $\epsilon$ fluctuations are given by $$C_{\chi}({\bf R},t) = \frac{\langle\chi(0,0)\chi({\bf R},t)\rangle-\langle\chi\rangle^2}{\langle\chi^2\rangle-\langle\chi\rangle^2}$$ and $$C_{\epsilon}({\bf R},t)= \frac{\langle \epsilon(0,0)\epsilon({\bf R},t)\rangle}{\langle \epsilon^2\rangle},$$ where $\epsilon = (D_{12}+D_{21})/2 = {\bf e}_3$ is the shear strain. Note that the temperature (or coupling constant) scales out for these quantities.
In Fig.\ref{corrt}(a), we plot $C_{\chi}({\bf 0},t)$.
The integrals over the Brillouin zone were computed numerically using a $256$ point Gauss quadrature for each real space lattice position. Our results are compared with those obtained from molecular dynamics simulations of a $500\times500$ site harmonic triangular net. To obtain the simulation results, the solid was first allowed to equilibrate for $4 \times 10^5$ MD steps with a time-step of $5\times10^{-4}$ in the canonical (NVE) ensemble.
Data was collected from $4 \times 10^5 $ to $4.2 \times 10^5$ MD steps at intervals of $400$ MD steps. Correlation functions were obtained by averaging over particles.
It is clear that our results agree with simulation data within the error bars of the latter. The decay of $C_\chi$ is not monotonic but oscillatory, a feature arising from the time-periodic lattice vibrations of the solid, which are all in phase at $t=0$, gradually de-cohering for larger times~\cite{vine}. Similar oscillations are also observed in $C_{\epsilon}$ shown in Fig.\ref{corrt}(b) for the same system and both $\chi$ and $\epsilon$ relax over similar time scales.
The complex relaxation of the dynamic correlations is even more in evidence when we evaluate these functions in both space and time. In Fig.\ref{CHICor}(a)-(c) we plot the full $C_\chi({\bf R},t)$ for the first few nearest neighbour lattice points of the 2d triangular lattice. For small times, this {\color{black} correlation} function is sharply peaked at the origin and decays rapidly to zero after the second neighbour shell (Fig.\ref{CHICor}(a)). At larger times, the function decays but becomes longer ranged extending up to the sixth neighbour shell for $t=5$ (Fig.\ref{CHICor}(c)), corresponding to a spread with a speed comparable to $c_T$; finally, $C_\chi({\bf R},t) \to 0$ everywhere for large time differences $t$.
\begin{figure}[h]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=6.0cm]{Fig-TC-2.pdf}
\caption{$C_\chi({\bf R},t)$ calculated at different times (a) $t=0$, (b) $t=2$, (c) $t=5$ for the harmonic triangular lattice. The parameters are the same as in Fig.\ref{corrt}. Note changes in scale between the three subpanels.}
\label{CHICor}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
In Fig. \ref{EPCor}(a)-(c) we show the corresponding space-time correlation functions for the shear strain. The equal time spatial correlation Fig.\ref{EPCor}(a) has been calculated before~\cite{sassy} and has also been measured from video microscopy of colloidal solids\cite{kers1}. The typical four-fold symmetry (butterfly pattern) of this correlation function has also been observed in experiments on amorphous colloids \cite{schall}. This pattern is easy to understand since $C_{\epsilon}({\bf R},0)$ represents the response of a solid to a delta function shear load at the origin, which may arise from a small inclusion or ``Eshelby'' defect ~\cite{quad}. At subsequent times, the correlation function retains its significant four-fold symmetry, although it shows wave-like oscillations in space and time; these eventually decay to zero.
\begin{figure}[h]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=6.0cm]{Fig-TC-3.pdf}
\caption{$C_\varepsilon({\bf R},t)$ calculated for times (a) $t=0$, (b) $t=2$, (c) $t=5$ for the same set of parameters as in Fig.\,\ref{corrt}. Note changes in scale between subpanels.}
\label{EPCor}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
The four-fold symmetry of the strain correlation function can also be understood from a momentum space formulation as described in~\cite{sassy}, where the Fourier transform of the shear strain correlation function is simply given by
$$ \tilde C_{\epsilon}({\bf q},t) = {\mathsf E}_{1212}+{\mathsf E}_{2121} + 2 {\mathsf E}_{1221},$$ with
\begin{equation}
{\color{black}{\mathsf E}_{\alpha \alpha' \gamma \gamma'} ({\bf q},t) = q_{\alpha'} q_{\gamma'}\sum_{s}\frac{{\color{black}\,a}_{s\alpha}({\bf q}) {\color{black}\,a}_{s\gamma}({\bf q})}{\omega^{2}_s({\bf q})} \cos(\omega_{s}({\bf q})t)}
\end{equation}
Substituting the expressions for ${\mathsf E}$ into $\tilde C_{\epsilon}$ and expanding all ${\bf q}$ dependent quantities to leading order in the wavenumber, we finally get ($q=|{\bf q}|$)
\begin{eqnarray}
\tilde C_{\epsilon}({\bf q},t)& = &\frac{4q_{x}^{2}q_{y}^{2}}{c_{L}^{2}{\bf q}^4}\cos(c_{L}\,q\,t)+\frac{(q_{x}^{2}-q_{y}^{2})^{2}}{c_{T}^{2}{\bf q}^4}\cos(c_{T}\,q\,t).\nonumber
\end{eqnarray}
The four-fold symmetry of $\tilde C_{\epsilon}$ is now obvious.
\section{Defect precursors in the 2d triangular crystal}
\label{sec:3}
In the previous two sections we derived a systematic procedure for analysing particle displacements within a coarse-graining volume $\Omega$ as affine or non-affine. The affine displacements can be identified as elastic strains whose fluctuations determine the elastic constants of the solid. In this section we turn to the identity of the non-affine fluctuations and show that {\color{black}the fluctuations with the highest contribution to $\chi$ represent precursors to the formation of pairs of lattice defects.} We also show that they are statistical fluctuations that obey standard fluctuation-response relations and thereby identify the conjugate field {\color {black}$h_X$}. Positive values of {\color {black}$h_X$} enhance and negative values suppress lattice defects. Finally we calculate space-time correlation functions for these lattice distortions in the presence of nonzero {\color {black}$h_X$}, using results derived in the earlier sections.
Recall that in the 2d triangular lattice $\langle \chi \rangle = \sum^8_{\mu=1} \sigma_\mu$ where the $\sigma_\mu$ are the eight non-zero eigenvalues of the $N_\Omega\,d \times N_\Omega\,d =12\times12$-dimensional matrix ${\mathsf P}{\mathsf C}{\mathsf P}$~\cite{sassy}. The eigenvectors ${\color{black}{\bf b}_{\mu}}$ corresponding to these eigenvalues represent non-affine distortions of the coarse graining volume, their relative contributions to $\chi$ being determined by the value of $\sigma_\mu$. In Fig.~\ref{eigen} we plot the magnitudes of $\sigma_\mu^{-1}$.
It is immediately clear that there are three groups of terms. {\color{black}The eigenvalues of the two degenerate, non-affine modes corresponding to $\mu = 1$ and $\mu = 2$ are separated from the next higher one $\mu = 3$ by a large gap -- a factor of $4$ -- and from the rest by an order of magnitude.} A close look at the eigenvectors corresponding to these eigenvalues reveals that these non-affine distortions tend to increase the distance between nearest neighbour particles and {\em reduce} next nearest neighbour bond lengths. If a nearest-neighbour bond is actually replaced by a next-nearest-neighbour one, then the coordination number of the particles changes and a pair of particles with $5$ and $7$ neighbours each would emerge out of the reference $6$-coordinated triangular structure. Each pair of neighbouring $5$- and $7$-coordinated atoms contains a dislocation (or an anti-dislocation depending on the orientation). These dislocation-anti-dislocation pairs can then separate from each other by subsequent non-affine fluctuations that change the coordination number of neighbouring atoms.
Of course in a harmonic lattice defects do not nucleate, though non-affine precursor fluctuations exist. Indeed, the overlap of particle displacements with a non-affine eigenvector ${\color{black}{\bf b}_{\mu}}$, given by $s_\mu = {\color{black}{\bf b}_{\mu}}^{\rm T}{\bf \Delta}$
, is a Gaussian random variable with probability distribution,
\begin{align*}
P(s_\mu)&=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi{\color{black}{\bf b}_{\mu}}^{\rm T}\mathsf{C}{\color{black}{\bf b}_{\mu}}}}\exp\left(-\frac{s_\mu^{2}}{{\color{black}{\bf b}_{\mu}}^{\rm T}\mathsf{C}{\color{black}{\bf b}_{\mu}}}\right),
\end{align*}
an expression analogous to the one for strains. The quantity ${\color{black}{\bf b}_{\mu}}^{\rm T}\mathsf{C}{\color{black}{\bf b}_{\mu}}$ appears as a susceptibility for defect precursor fluctuations. The fluctuation-response relation connects this susceptibility with a response function measuring the response of $s_\mu$ to a conjugate field. We investigate this connection below. For the rest of this paper, we present results only for $\mu = 1$. The corresponding {\color {black} results} for the degenerate $\mu = 2$ eigenvector are either identical or completely analogous.
\begin{figure}[t]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=6.0cm]{Fig-TC-4.pdf}
\caption{Plot of the inverses of the eigenvalues
$\sigma_\mu$ of the non-affine projection ${\mathsf P}{\mathsf C}{\mathsf P}$ together with the eigenvectors for the three largest eigenvalues that indicate the most prevalent fluctuations. Note that there are two degenerate soft modes $1,2$ separated by a large gap from the next most important contributor $3$. The two soft modes tend to increase the nearest neighbour bond length $a-b$, at the same time decreasing the distance between next nearest neighbours $c-d$ (shown by gray dashed line).}
\label{eigen}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
To proceed further, we consider the global non-affinity $X = N^{-1}\sum_{i=1}^N \chi{\color{black} ({\bf R}_i)}$ averaged over all particles $i = 1\dots N$
and introduce a field conjugate to this quantity in (\ref{harm}) to obtain,
\begin{equation}
H = H_{harm} - h_X\,N\,X.
\label{harmh}
\end{equation}
The extra term in (\ref{harmh}), though still quadratic in the particle coordinates, introduces a many-body force (see section~\ref{sec:4}) that depends on the positions of all particles in a given neighbourhood {\color{black}$\Omega$}. A change in the coordinate of particle $i$ modifies not only the local {\color{black}$\chi$} at that particle but also those of its neighbours. The force also depends on the reference lattice positions $\{{\bf R}\}$, which act as constant parameters. A purely affine transformation of $\Omega$, such as a volume rescaling for example, does not produce a non-affine force. This force therefore tracks only non-affine distortions away from the reference configuration. The dynamical matrix corresponding to (\ref{harmh}) can be computed without difficulty and therefore the statistics of the local $\chi$ and the local strains,
together with their space-time correlation functions can be obtained for arbitrary $h_X$ using the procedures outlined in~\cite{sassy} and sections~\ref{sec:2} and~\ref{sec:3}. This holds true as long as the structure of the solid is maintained, i.e.\ as long as the reference configurations $\{{\bf R}\}$ remain the global minimum of the modified Hamiltonian (\ref{harmh}). Note that, for our MD simulations, in addition to the term proportional to $h_X$, we have also included a small hard core repulsion of the Weeks,Chandler, Anderson (WCA) form~\cite{UMS}. This prevents atoms from overlapping at large values of $h_X$ and also introduces anharmonicity in a controlled fashion such that {\color{black} the} relative contribution of this term to the energy provides us with a measure of anharmonic contributions. The hard core diameter $d_0 = 0.6 l$ was chosen to be small enough so that anharmonic effects vanish for {\color{black}small values of $h_X$} and all our results based on harmonic analysis hold in this limit.
The statistics of the global $X$ and the local $\chi$ are clearly related to each other. For example, the thermal averages are equal, $\langle X \rangle = \langle \chi \rangle$. The variance of $X$ is
\begin{eqnarray}
\langle (\Delta X)^2 \rangle & = & \langle X^2\rangle - \langle X \rangle^2 \nonumber \\
& = & N^{-2} \langle \sum_{\bf R} \chi({\bf R}) \sum_{{\bf R}'} \chi({\bf R}') \rangle - \langle \chi \rangle^2 \nonumber \\
& = & N^{-1} \sum_{R}[\langle \chi({\bf 0})\chi({\bf R}) \rangle - \langle \chi \rangle^2] \nonumber \\
& = & N^{-1} \langle {\color{black}(\Delta \chi)^2} \rangle \sum_{\bf R}C_\chi({\bf R},0)
\label{therml}
\end{eqnarray}
The cross-correlation $\langle \Delta\chi({\bf R}) \Delta X \rangle$ has the same expression for any $\bf R$.
The variance of $X$ vanishes in the $N\to \infty$ limit as expected for an intensive thermodynamic variable (see Fig.~\ref{therm-limit}); the distribution, $P(X)$, therefore becomes a delta function centered at $\langle \chi \rangle$.
\begin{figure}[t]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=6.0cm]{Fig-TC-5.pdf}
\caption{Plot of $\langle (\Delta {\color {black} X})^2 \rangle$ as a function of $N^{-1}$ at ${\color {black}h_X} = 0$ from our MD simulations for $N = 10\times10, 12\times12, 14\times14, 16\times16, 18\times18, 100\times100$ and $500\times500$ lattices. The straight line is the prediction from (\ref{therml}) without any fitting parameters. Note that for smaller lattices there are significant deviations from the asymptotic slope.}
\label{therm-limit}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
To obtain the response $\langle X(h_X)\rangle$, for small $h_X$ we first compute $\langle {\color{black}(\Delta\chi)^2} \rangle$ at $h_X = 0$ and then use the linear response relation,
\begin{equation}
\frac{\partial \langle X \rangle}{\partial h_X} = \langle {\color{black}(\Delta \chi)^2} \rangle \sum_{\bf R} C_\chi({\bf R},0).
\label{LR-chi}
\end{equation}
\begin{figure}[t]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=6.0cm]{Fig-TC-6.pdf}
\caption{Plots of {\color {black} (a)} $\langle {\color {black} X} \rangle$ and {\color {black}(b)} $\langle s_{\mu}^2 \rangle$, for $\mu = 1$, as a function of $h_X$. The points are MD simulation data from an $N = 200\times200$ lattice. Error bars are smaller than the size of the symbols. The solid curves through the data are the analytic results obtained from direct computation. The dashed straight lines are {\color{black}the} linear response predictions (\ref{LR-chi}) \& (\ref{LR-s}) respectively.}
\label{resp}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
The non-affine field also changes the statistics of the {\color{black}dominant displacement fluctuations $s_\mu$}.
Since the global non-affinity $X$ is quadratic in particle displacements, the field $h_X$ cannot break the symmetry of $s_\mu$. The probability distribution $P(s_{\mu})$ remains Gaussian but with a variance $\langle s_{\mu}^2 \rangle$ that depends on {\color {black}$h_X$}. Again, a linear response calculation gives,
\begin{eqnarray}
\frac{\partial \langle s_{\mu}^{2} \rangle}{\partial h_X} & = & \langle X s_{\mu}^{2}\rangle_{0}-\langle X\rangle_{0}\langle s_{\mu}^{2}\rangle_{0} \nonumber \\
& = & 2 \sum_{\bf R} {\color{black}{\bf b}^{\rm T}_{\mu}}\bar{\mathsf{C}} \mathsf{P} \bar{\mathsf{C}}^{\rm T} {\color{black}{\bf b}_{\mu}}.
\label{LR-s}
\end{eqnarray}
with $\bar{\mathsf{C}}$ as given in (\ref{MATC}).
In Fig.~\ref{resp} we have plotted $\langle {\color{black} X} \rangle$ and $\langle s_{\mu}^2 \rangle$ as functions of $h_X$. For $h_X > 0$, both of these quantities increase making defects more likely to form. In contrast a negative $h_X$ {\em suppresses} those fluctuations that give rise to defects. The points are simulation results that are compared with the linear response results as well as the full nonlinear calculation obtained by evaluating the dynamical matrix for the Hamiltonian~(\ref{harmh}).
Space-time correlations of the defect precursors may be computed quite straightforwardly from the formalism presented in section~\ref{sec:2}. Indeed, the correlation of the dominant non-affine displacement $s_{\mu}$ is
$\langle s_\mu^2 \rangle\,C_s({\bf R},t) = \langle s_{\mu}({\bf 0},0)s_{\mu}({\bf R},t)\rangle = {\color{black}{\bf b}_{\mu}}^{\rm T} \bar{\mathsf{C}}{\color{black}{\bf b}_{\mu}}.$
\begin{figure}[t]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=6.0cm]{Fig-TC-7.pdf}
\caption{ Plots of the normalised {\color{black}(a)} $C_\chi({\bf 0},t)$ and {\color {black}(b)} $C_s({\bf 0},t)$ for three values of $h_X$ compared with results from MD simulations of $500 \times 500$ particles. Note that the precursor fluctuations become more long-lived as {\color {black}$h_X$} increases.}
\label{mu-tc}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
Fig.~\ref{mu-tc} shows plots of $C_\chi({\bf 0},t)$ and $C_s({\bf 0},t)$
against time $t$ for a few values of {\color {black}$h_X$}. The displacement correlations, like those shown in section~\ref{sec:3}, are oscillatory and decay slowly in time due to destructive interference of the large number of mutually incommensurate phonon modes that make up these localised fluctuations. More importantly, Fig.~\ref{mu-tc} shows that the lifetime of these defect precursors grows as {\color {black}$h_X$} increases; the time period of the correlation function oscillations also increases as expected. Finally in Fig.~\ref{mu-rtc} we plot the full $C_s ({\bf R},t)$ for three values of ${\color {black}h_X} = 0.00, 0.03$ and $0.05$ as well as for three values of the time $t=0, 2$ and $5$ as in Figs. ~\ref{CHICor} and \ref{EPCor}. Unlike the correlation functions for $\chi$ and $\varepsilon$, the correlations of $s_{\mu}$ are ``anti-ferromagnetic", i.e. a fluctuation $s_{\mu}$ of any sign at some lattice point induces a fluctuation of $s_{\mu}$ of the {\em opposite} sign at the neighbouring lattice point.
\begin{figure*}[t]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=15.0cm]{Fig-TC-8.pdf}
\caption{Plot of the normalised $C_s({\bf R},t)$ for ${\color {black}h_X} = 0.00, 0.03$ and $0.05$ for $t = 0$, $2$ and $5$. Note that the precursor fluctuations are spatially anisotropic and anti-correlated at all times. The non-affine field makes the correlations stronger. We have plotted the correlations for $\mu = 1$; the corresponding functions for $\mu = 2$ are essentially rotated by $90^\circ$.}
\label{mu-rtc}
\end{center}
\end{figure*}
What is the effect of external stress $\bf{\Sigma}$ on the defect precursors? It is again easy to answer this question by a straightforward calculation: one only needs to include the term {\color{black}${\bf \Sigma}^{\rm T} \sum_{i=1}^{N} {\bf e}({\bf R}_{i})$}
in the Hamiltonian (\ref{harm}), where {\color {black}${\bf e}({\bf R}_{i})$ is now} the {\em local} strain at particle $i$. The probability $P(s_{\mu})$ remains Gaussian with the same variance but now the $\pm$ symmetry of $s_{\mu}$ is explicitly broken and $P(s_{\mu})$ is shifted with a mean $\langle s_{\mu} \rangle = \sum_{\bf R} {\color{black}{\bf b}^{\rm T}_{\mu}}\bar{\mathsf{C}}\mathsf{Q}^{\rm T}{\bf \Sigma} \neq 0$.
To lowest order, therefore -- or exactly in a harmonic solid -- stress biases the distribution of defect precursors without changing their variance. Similarly, $\bf{\Sigma}$ does not affect the space-time correlation functions of $s_{\mu}$.
\section{Generating $h_X$ using laser tweezers}
\label{sec:4}
In this section, we propose an experimental realisation of the many-body term in the Hamiltonian (\ref{harmh}) using dynamic laser traps -- a technology currently available within most sophisticated experimental optics research groups. Colloidal particles are dielectric and therefore become polarised in an electric field. Fairly intense light from a laser may be used to trap these particles, which experience a force proportional to the gradient of the light intensity $I({\bf r})$ and therefore prefer to accumulate in regions of large $I({\bf r})$. This effect is extremely useful in manipulating colloidal beads in the lab to investigate myriads of phenomena from biology to material science. There are many reviews and books on the subject, such as Ref.~\cite{HOT}. More specifically, optical traps have been used to manipulate colloidal solids, introduce defects and watch their dynamics using video microscopy~\cite{tweeze}.
The term proportional to $h_X$ in (\ref{harmh}) depends only on the reference lattice set $\{{\bf R}\}$ and the instantaneous particle positions and can be generated for every particle $i$ once a particular configuration is known.
For example, one can explicitly write,
\[
\chi_i = \sum_{jk} ({\bf u}_j-{\bf u}_i)^{\rm T}{\bf P}_{j-i,k-i}({\bf u}_k-{\bf u}_i)
\]
where we gather the cartesian components of $\mathsf P$ for a given pair of particles into a matrix {\color{black}${\bf P}_{\{.,.\}}$}, and assume that this matrix is zero when $j$ or $k$ are outside the neighbourhood $\Omega$ around $i$. Then
\[
NX = \sum_{ijk} ({\bf u}_j-{\bf u}_i)^{\rm T}{\bf P}_{j-i,k-i}({\bf u}_k-{\bf u}_i)
\]
The force on particle $i$ is ${\bf F}_i = - (\partial/\partial {\bf r}_i) (-{\color {black}h_X} N X)$. Direct differentiation of the expression for $X$ then gives
\begin{equation}
{\bf F}_i = 2{\color {black}h_X} \sum_{jk}
\left[
{\bf P}_{j-i,k-i}({\bf u}_i-{\bf u}_k)
+{\bf P}_{i-j,k-j}({\bf u}_k-{\bf u}_j)
\right]
\label{lforce}
\end{equation}
The first contribution comes from $\chi_i$, the second from $\chi_j$ with $j\neq i$.
The fact that the above forces can be worked out from the positions of the particles and {\color {black}their} nearby neighbours (nearest and next-nearest neighbours, if the coarse-graining volume $\Omega$ contains exactly the nearest neighbours) suggests the following algorithm for generating a uniform non-affine field $h_X
$ for a set of $N$ colloidal particles:
\begin{enumerate}
\item At any instant obtain the coordinates of the $N$ particles through video microscopy.
\item Randomly choose a subset of $M$ of these particles that will have {\color {black}$h_X$}-forces applied to them.
\item For each of the $M$ particles obtain the values of the necessary forces from the coordinates of their neighbors.
\item Apply the forces by constructing a set of $M$ laser traps. The traps will need to be placed slightly away from the respective present particle positions so that the particles experience exactly the forces calculated from (\ref{lforce}). The exact displacements of the traps will depend on $I({\bf r})$ and therefore vary with the specific apparatus and implementation.
\item In the next instant repeat steps $1-4$ above, choosing another random subset of $M$ particles to track.
\end{enumerate}
If these steps are repeated on a time scale much faster than the typical diffusion time of colloids, then one should be able to simulate a uniform field {\color {black}$h_X$} applied across all the $N$ particles. It is possible to update dynamical traps at $200-600$ Hz, and set up at least $M = 300$ traps simultaneously for micron sized colloidal particles using {\color{black} spatial light modulator (SLM) technology}~\cite{HOT}. This should be enough to generate a uniform $h_X$ as long as the ratio of the dynamical timescale to the update timescale {\color{black}is} larger than $N/M$. Alternatively, one may also look at the effect of a local {\color {black}$h_X$} which couples to the $\chi$ of a single particle {\color{black}and can create local} defect precursors. Statistics of such local and non-uniform, dynamic, light fields may also be computed, if desired, from the formalism outlined in this work.
\section{Discussion and conclusions}
\label{sec:5}
In this paper we have calculated the space-time correlation functions for thermally generated non-affine fluctuations and elastic strains in a harmonic ideal crystal. The non-affine and elastic strain fields were obtained by projecting atomic displacements into orthogonal affine and non-affine sub-spaces defined by coarse-graining over a fixed volume $\Omega$. Our results show that these correlation functions decay to zero with time and over distance although the relaxation to the late time value is oscillatory rather than monotonic. The time correlation functions for non-affine fluctuations and strains have not been described so far in the literature though we feel that they may be obtained easily for colloidal solids using video microscopy. {\color{black}This should allow verification of our results} against experimental data~\cite{zahn,kers1}. Note that the harmonic approximation that we have used throughout has been demonstrated to describe colloidal solids rather well~\cite{harm-colloid}.
{\color{black}In addition we have identified particular non-affine fluctuations in the 2d triangular lattice which, we demonstrate, are precursors to the production of dislocation- anti-dislocation pairs and arise naturally from a systematic coarse-graining procedure.} We emphasise that the defect precursors $s_{\mu}$ are {\em not} themselves defects since the equilibrium average $\langle s_\mu \rangle = 0$.
In order to form dislocation pairs, these localised fluctuations need to {\em condense} by escaping over a, possibly stress dependent, barrier {\color{black} $\Delta f$}, a process not describable within harmonic theory\cite{chandra}. Indeed, if the bond c-d in Fig.~\ref{eigen} were to form, a Burgers circuit around particle $0$ would yield a non-zero Burgers
vector. {\color{black} One can argue, as below, that the non-affine field $h_X$ will actually greatly enhance the formation of such dislocation dipoles in a real solid. The rate of barrier crossing is proportional to $\exp(-\beta \Delta f)$ with a prefactor, the so called ``attempt frequency'' which is a product of the characteristic frequencies of oscillation of the system in its parent state and at the saddle point~\cite{chandra}. Consider the neighbourhood $\Omega$ of a single particle. In a solid with anharmonic forces between particles, the free energy for producing a precursor fluctuation of amplitude $s_\mu$ has the form $f(s_\mu) = A s_\mu^2 - B s_\mu^4 + C s_\mu^6$, where $A, B$ and $C$ are, possibly temperature (and stress) dependent, phenomenological parameters. Note that, in the harmonic limit $B=C=0$ and $A \propto \langle s_\mu^2 \rangle^{-1}$. This form for the free energy ensures that the $\pm s_\mu$ symmetry is preserved and a non-zero barrier for the nucleation of a dislocation dipole ($\langle s_\mu \rangle \ne 0$), given by the saddle point value of $f(s_\mu)$, exists. When $h_X$ is turned on, this has the effect of increasing $\langle s_\mu^2 \rangle$ (see (\ref{LR-s})). This has two consequences: it decreases both the attempt frequency and $\Delta f$ with the latter effect far outweighing the former and effectively causing an overall increase in the rate of production of dislocation dipoles. For negative $h_X$, on the other hand $\Delta f$ is increased and dislocation nucleation is suppressed.}
The dynamics considered in our formulation is entirely composed of lattice vibrations. In a crystalline solid one needs to consider, in addition, the slow vacancy diffusion mode ~\cite{martin}. Since the vacancy concentration in crystalline solids at temperatures far from melting is vanishingly small, this contribution is mostly negligible at low temperatures. However, close to the melting transition, the diffusion of vacancies does contribute significantly. Within a harmonic theory, there is, of course, no description of vacancy diffusion. On the other hand, vacancy diffusion over large distances occurs by small movements of atoms across distances of the order of the lattice spacing --- and so of the sort involved in the nucleation of a dislocation pair. Hence precursor fluctuations for vacancy diffusion may be similarly described as a non-affine distortion of a volume $\Omega$ containing a single vacancy. A calculation of vacancy migration precursors using a procedure similar to the one described in this work is in progress.
Our calculations may also be generalised to amorphous solids. In such solids, the lack of a clearly defined reference configuration makes the identity of the relevant non-affine fluctuations debatable. The dominant deformation mechanisms in amorphous solids are local atomic rearrangements that resemble, somewhat, our defect precursor modes. However, it is not clear whether, in a particular realisation of the amorphous structure, such precursors are ``frozen in''~\cite{manning1,manning2} even at zero stress or are produced during the deformation protocol~\cite{itamar2}. We believe that a generalisation of our calculation may be able to elucidate this point by looking at neighbourhoods with large non-affine susceptibility and determining the response to both stress and the non-affine field $h_X$.
The results presented here may be verified in experiments on colloidal solids or dusty plasmas in the presence of a field $h_X$ produced using laser tweezers~\cite{tweeze, HOT}. Since functionalised colloidal assemblies have many technological applications, control over their structure may be of some use~\cite{colloids}. In section~\ref{sec:4}, we outline an algorithm which, we believe, can be implemented in practice. Similar ideas have been reported in the literature~\cite{tweeze} where light fields have been used to create dislocations and grain boundaries by manipulating individual colloidal particles. We believe our approach allows greater control by targeting, instead, defect precursor fluctuations. First of all, one is able to both increase {\em as well as suppress} defect densities in a crystal by an external light field. Also, if $h_X$ is applied sufficiently slowly, the solid may be persuaded to remain in thermodynamic equilibrium {\em at a given temperature} throughout the process without producing unwanted stresses and deformations. Finally, the specific dynamics of such protocols (switching $h_X$ off or on at some rate) can be computed within the formalism discussed here. {\color{black} It is also, in principle, possible to excite a local non-affine displacement or even a specific non-affine mode, say $s_1$, at a specific point using our ideas. For the latter case, however, one needs to know beforehand the eigenvectors of the local ${\mathsf P}{\mathsf C}{\mathsf P}$, which involves a knowledge of the interactions embodied in the ${\mathsf C}$ matrix. This introduces uncertainties that are not encountered while imposing $h_X$.}
For dusty plasmas~\cite{colloids}, the equations we have used for the space-time correlation functions are immediately applicable. For colloidal particles dispersed in a liquid, of course, one needs to account for damping and Brownian noise terms in the dynamical equation (\ref{MATC}) to compare time-dependent quantities with experiments. Equilibrium predictions, though, would continue to be valid. Also anharmonic interactions, always present in real colloids, would lead to metastable defects {\color{black}at} positive $h_X$. Our calculations are then directly valid for small values of the field before such nucleation events actually take place. We believe that in this case, our results will be of much value for checking and validating {\color{black}the relevant} experiments.
\begin{acknowledgments}
SG thanks CSIR India for a Senior Research Fellowship. SG and SS are grateful for funding from the FP7-PEOPLE-2013-IRSES grant no: 612707, DIONICOS. Discussions with A. Mitra, S. Karmakar and J. Horbach are gratefully acknowledged.
\end{acknowledgments}
\vskip -.5 cm
|
\section{Introduction}
\label{sec:intro}
Sketches, as a form of visual representation, exhibit a great variety from realistic portraits to sparsely drawn, stylistic ones. In particular, consider freehand (i.e. hand-drawn) sketches of objects. An instance of such a sketch can be seen in Figure \ref{fig:cup}. Though containing minimal detail, the object category to which it belongs is easily determined. This suggests an inherent sparseness in the human neuro-visual representation of the object. Therefore, studying such sparse sketches can aid our understanding of the cognitive processes involved and spur the design of efficient visual classifiers.
Freehand line sketches are typically formed as a composition of primitive hand-drawn curves (called strokes) added sequentially over time. A significant body of work has examined such sketches in the context of classification and content-based retrieval problems\cite{Hu:2013:PEG:2479988.2480107}\cite{Hu2010}\cite{KMY06}\cite{QiGLZXS13}. In these problems, the end product of the sketching process, i.e. the full sketch, is typically considered \textit{in-toto}. However, we believe it can be quite instructive to study the temporal process of sketch formation itself, starting with the first hand-drawn stroke until the last stroke which finalizes the sketch. Our belief originates in a surprising discovery we have made : For a given sketch, there exists a minimal discriminative subset of all its strokes which contribute to the sketch's identity (category) being recognized consistently and correctly. We term the sketch composed using this minimal stroke subset as a \textit{category-epitome}. Figure \ref{fig:primal-sketches} shows examples of freehand line sketches and their corresponding sparse \textit{category-epitome}s.
In this paper, we describe how these sparse \textit{category-epitome}s are obtained. The \textit{category-epitome} has a unique feature which sets it apart from other methods of sparse sketch generation: The process of epitome construction guarantees that the most fundamental strokes which enable category recognition (discrimination) are retained. To quantify the sparseness of an epitome, we provide a natural measure termed epitome-score. We analyze the eptiomes and corresponding epitome-scores for freehand sketches across various object categories.Our analysis provides a novel viewpoint for studying the semantic nature of object categories.
The rest of the paper is organized as follows: We briefly review related literature in Section \ref{sec:relatedwork}. In Section \ref{sec:sketchclassifier}, we describe the construction of a sketch classifier. This sketch classifier plays a crucial role in obtaining \textit{category-epitome} of a given sketch. In Section \ref{sec:catepitome}, we describe how the \textit{category-epitome} of a sketch is actually obtained and provide a simple, natural measure termed epitome-score to quantify its epitomal-ness. Section \ref{sec:analysis} contains an analysis of \textit{category-epitomes} and epitome-scores across object categories. Section \ref{sec:conclusion} concludes the paper by outlining some of the promising directions for future work.
\begin{figure}[t]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=.15\linewidth]{Figures/cup-linesketch.eps}
\caption{In spite of minimal detail, we can recognize the line sketch easily and correctly as belonging to the category \texttt{cup}.}
\label{fig:cup}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure*}[ht!]
\includegraphics[height=3.5cm,width=\textwidth]{Figures/primal-sketches-examples-7.eps}
\caption{Original sketches (top row) and corresponding \textit{category-epitome}s (bottom row) for various object categories.}
\label{fig:primal-sketches}
\end{figure*}
\section{Related Work}
\label{sec:relatedwork}
In his seminal work \cite{Marr}, Marr suggested an abstract representation called the \textit{primal sketch} -- a sparse, sketch-like representation of generic images in terms of image primitives. Inspired by his theories, methods for formalizing the notion of primal sketch have been proposed \cite{Guo:2003:TMT:946247.946727} and primal sketch representations have been used as features for object detection\cite{KMY06}, texture characterization\cite{haralick_topographic_1983} and for super-resolution\cite{Sun03imagehallucination}.
Yet another line of research aims to generate sketches from one or more source images\cite{QiGLZXS13}\cite{MarvaniyaBMM12} without explicit recourse to the idea of primal sketch. A common feature in all these works is the utilization of photographic images as the starting point. In contrast, our starting point is the sketch stroke data created by human beings. This provides a glimmer of hope that the sparse neurovisual representation of the object being sketched is transferred to the sketch in the process of drawing, at least in part.
In addition to the artificial (i.e. not generated by human hand) nature of sketch generation, the works mentioned above do not attempt to quantify the sparseness of the resulting sketch. They also do not examine the temporal nature of sketch composition. In contrast, recent work by Berger et. al.\cite{Berger:2013:SAP:2461912.2461964} analyzes the temporal aspect of sketching in the context of mimicking artist style. However, their emphasis is on synthesizing abstract facial sketches rather than recognition. Moreover, their sketches are produced by professional artists. In contrast, our sketches have been generated by crowdsourcing from the general public. The idea of identifying and utilizing a discriminative subset of strokes was employed by Karteek et al.\cite{Alahari:2005:DSO:1106779.1106963} for classifying online handwritten data. Another work close in spirit to ours is the unpublished, but publicly available manuscript of Jiang et al.\cite{jiangzhu} which examines the temporal evolution of sketches from a visualization perspective. Finally, the work of Eitz et al.\cite{eitz} examines how humans tend to draw objects by analyzing a large number of sketches spread across commonly encountered object categories. We employ their database of sketches in this paper.
\section{Building the sketch classifier}
\label{sec:sketchclassifier}
\begin{figure*}[ht]
\centering
\includegraphics[height=2.5cm,width=1.00\textwidth]{Figures/cumul-sketch-example.eps}
\caption{Constructing the \textit{category-epitome} for an \texttt{airplane} sketch: The sketch has 9 strokes. $S_1 - S_9$ are the cumulative stroke sequence canvases. A red cross mark indicates a misclassification($0$) while a green tick mark indicates correct classification($1$). Canvas $S_4$ outlined by a cyan rectangle is the \textit{category-epitome}. Note that even though canvas $S_2$ is classified correctly, we consider \textit{category-epitome} as canvas $S_4$, the temporally earliest, correctly classified canvas whose successors are classified correctly as well.}
\label{fig:computing-primality}
\end{figure*}
\subsection{The sketch database}
The sketches used in our study have been taken from the publicly available freehand line sketch database of Eitz et al.\cite{eitz}. This database contains a curated set of $20,000$ hand-drawn sketches evenly distributed across $250$ object categories. As mentioned before, these sketches have been obtained by crowdsourcing across the general population. As such, they are a good starting point for analyzing the underpinnings of the sketching process by humans. A few examples from the database can be seen in the top row of Figure \ref{fig:primal-sketches}. The dominant appeal of this database is that the temporal stroke information (the sequential order in which the strokes were drawn) for a sketch has been provided. As we will see in Section \ref{sec:catepitome}, it is precisely the temporal stroke information that forms the basis for obtaining the \textit{category-epitome} and the corresponding epitome-score for sketches.
\subsection{Sketch data augmentation}
\label{sec:augmentation}
The database of Eitz. et. al. contains $80$ sketches per category. To increase the number of sketches per category available for training the classifier (Section \ref{sec:classif}), we perform data augmentation by applying geometric and morphological transformations to each sketch. Specifically, each sketch is initially subjected to image dilation using a $5 \times 5$ square structuring element. A number of transforms are applied to this thickened sketch -- mirroring (across vertical axis), rotation ($\pm 5,\pm 15$ degrees), combinations of horizontal and vertical shifts ($\pm 5,\pm 15$ pixels), central zoom ($\pm 3\%,\pm 7 \%$ of image height). As a result, $30$ new sketches are generated per original sketch. The data augmentation procedure results in $2400$ sketches per category, for a total of $600,000$ sketches across $250$ categories.
\subsection{Sketch feature extraction}
\label{sec:sketchfeatex}
As the top row of Figure \ref{fig:primal-sketches} demonstrates, the spatial density of sketch strokes can be quite small. Moreover, extracting typical image features (e.g. based on texture) is ruled out and edge information is quite sparse. Nevertheless, a number of alternatives have been proposed as sketch features. For a survey of these methods in the context of sketch-based image retrieval, refer to \cite{Hu:2013:PEG:2479988.2480107}. We extract Histogram of Oriented Gradients(HOG\cite{HOG})-like sketch descriptors using the pipeline described by Eitz et. al.\cite{eitz}. The collection of descriptors so obtained are then combined using Fisher image representation approach\cite{perronnin2007fisher} to obtain a feature vector for each sketch.
\subsection{Sketch Classification}
\label{sec:classif}
As an initial exploration and for ease of analysis, we consider only the first $50$ alphabetically sorted sketch categories. We build a sketch classifier by utilizing $80\%$ of the augmented sketches(Section \ref{sec:augmentation}) from each category for training and the rest for testing. Doing so provides $2400 \times 0.8 \times 50 = 96,000$ sketches for training and $80 \times 0.2 \times 50 = 800$ sketches for testing\footnote{Testing is done only on the original sketch subjected to dilation and not on its subsequently transformed variants generated for data augmentation. Hence the factor of $80$ for each test category instead of the full $2400$ as in training.}.
From each test sketch, its Fisher feature vector(Section \ref{sec:sketchfeatex}) is obtained. A multi-class Support Vector Machine (SVM) classifier employing a Radial Basis Function (RBF) kernel was trained on the Fisher feature vectors by employing $5$-fold cross validation and grid-based parameter search. The accuracy of the resulting classifier was $60.25\%$. For context, the accuracy (for the same split ratio of training and test sketches) obtained by Eitz et. al. \cite{eitz} is $54\%$ with the caveat that the number of categories are larger than ours -- $250$.
In the overall scheme of things, the sketch classifier is only useful to the extent that it lets us determine the \textit{category-epitome}s. Seen in this light, the accuracy of the classifier assumes secondary importance. However, a classifier with good performance is still desirable as it ensures a larger coverage of the test set. In addition, such a classifier could potentially help obtain sparser \textit{category-epitome}s compared to a counterpart whose performance is relatively poor. Nevertheless, to progress towards our goal of determining \textit{category-epitome}s, we settle for the existing performance of the sketch classifier. In the next section, we shall see how the sketch classifier is actually utilized in constructing the \textit{category-epitome}.
\section{Obtaining the category-epitome}
\label{sec:catepitome}
\subsection{Constructing Cumulative Stroke Sequences}
\label{sec:sketch-sequence-construction}
As the first step in determining the \textit{category-epitome}, we construct sequences of cumulative strokes derived from correctly classified test sketches. Suppose the sequence of strokes in the temporal order they were drawn in a test sketch is given by $S = \{s_1,s_2\ldots s_N\}$ where $N$ is the total number of strokes in the sketch. To construct the corresponding cumulative stroke sequence, we begin with a blank canvas. Strokes from the given sketch are successively added to the blank canvas in the temporal order. As each stroke is added, intermediate canvases $S_1,S_2 ,\ldots ,S_N $ are created. Specifically, the intermediate canvases are given by $S_1 = \{s_1\},S_2=\{s_1,s_2\},\ldots ,S_N=\{s_1,s_2,\ldots ,s_N\}$. At the end of this process, we obtain the cumulative stroke sequence $CSS = \{S_1, \ldots ,S_N\}$. Figure \ref{fig:computing-primality} illustrates the creation of cumulative stroke sequence for a sketch from \texttt{airplane} category.
\subsection{Constructing the category-eptiome}
Having generated the cumulative stroke sequence for a sketch as described above, the \textit{category-epitome} can be constructed. Using the classifier from Section \ref{sec:sketchclassifier}, each intermediate canvas of the cumulative stroke sequence is classified to obtain a binary labeling -- the label is $1$ if the sketch category is correctly identified and $0$ otherwise. Thus, we obtain a binary label sequence $\mathcal{L} = \{l_1,l_2,\ldots ,l_N\}$ corresponding to each canvas of the cumulative stroke sequence $CSS$(see Figure \ref{fig:computing-primality}).
Note that the final canvas $S_N$ corresponds to the original test sketch since all the strokes have been added to the canvas at that point. Therefore, the final classification label $l_N$ must be $1$ since we are working with correctly classified test sketches. Now, consider the product sequence $\mathcal{P} = \{P_1,P_2..\ldots P_N\}$ formed by cumulative multiplication of labels $l_i \in \mathcal{L},i=1,2\ldots N$:
\begin{align}
\label{seq}
P_i = \prod_{j=i}^{N} l_j
\end{align}
Then, the \textit{category-epitome} corresponds to canvas $S_e$ of the cumulative stroke sequence such that
\begin{align}
\label{primality}
e = \min_{1 \le i \le N} \{i | P_i = 1 \}
\end{align}
Informally, the \textit{category-epitome} $S_e$ is the temporally earliest, correctly classified canvas whose successors are classified correctly as well. Using the example in Figure \ref{fig:computing-primality}, the classification label sequence is given by $\mathcal{L} = \{0,1,0,1,1,1,1,1,1\}$. From Equation \eqref{seq}, the product sequence is computed as $\mathcal{P} = \{0,0,0,1,1,1,1,1,1\}$. From Equation \eqref{primality}, we obtain $e=4$. In other words, canvas $S_4$ (outlined by a cyan rectangle in Figure \ref{fig:computing-primality}) corresponds to the \textit{category-epitome}: the temporally earliest, correctly classified canvas whose successors $S_5 \ldots S_9$ are classified correctly as well. Figure \ref{fig:primal-sketches} shows sketches from various categories and their corresponding \textit{category-epitome}s.
\subsection{Epitome-score : Quantifying the \textit{category-epitome}}
Our procedure for obtaining the \textit{category-epitome}, described above, also provides a natural method for quantifying the ``epitome"-ness of the original, full sketch. Using $e$ obtained from Equation \eqref{primality}, we define the epitome-score $\mathcal{E}$ of a sketch as :
\begin{align}
\label{episcore}
\mathcal{E} =
\begin{cases}
\frac{e}{N},\mbox{$e \neq 1$} \\
0,\hspace{1.5mm} \mbox{$e=1$}
\end{cases}
\end{align}
where $N$ is the total number of strokes in the sketch. $e=1$ corresponds to the situation where merely drawing the first stroke conveys the epitome-ness of the sketch. Therefore, we have defined the corresponding epitome-score $\mathcal{E}$ to be $0$ for consistency across sketches. Our definition of epitome-score $\mathcal{E}$ essentially conveys the sparseness underlying the sketch -- the smaller its value, the more sparser the sketch is likely to be. Epitome-scores very close to $1$, on the other hand, indicate that very few strokes in the original sketch are redundant. Fortunately, very high epitome-scores are not the norm, as we will see -- sparsity is pervasive across categories. Referring once again to Figure \ref{fig:computing-primality}, the epitome-score for the \texttt{airplane} sketch is computed as $\mathcal{E} = \frac{4}{9} = 0.44$.
\section{Analysis}
\label{sec:analysis}
\begin{figure*}[!ht]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=1.0\linewidth, height=0.3\textwidth]{Figures/epitome-scores-temporal-2.eps}
\caption{Median epitome-scores (y-axis) and corresponding error bars for $50$ object categories(x-axis). The standard errors are clamped to $[0,1]$ -- the range of epitome-scores. The median scores are shown as filled circles. }
\label{fig:primality-with-errorbars}
\centering
\end{figure*}
\begin{figure}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth]{Figures/primality-trend-temporal-2.eps}
\caption{Demonstrating the effect of budgeting epitome-score on category recognition rate using data from $10$ selected categories. Values of various possible epitome-score thresholds are shown on x-axis. The $\%$ of images in each category which exceed a particular value of the threshold are shown on y-axis. The $10$ category names are shown adjacent to their respective plots.}
\label{fig:primality-trend-length}
\end{figure}
\subsection{Epitome-scores across categories}
\label{sec:primality-across-categories}
We begin our analysis by computing the median of epitome-scores for sketches on a category-by-category basis. Figure \ref{fig:primality-with-errorbars} displays the median epitome-scores (shown as filled circles in the figure) for test sketches across $50$ object categories. It is heartening to observe that $42\%(21/50)$ of the categories have median epitome-scores below $0.5$ and $80\%(40/50)$ of the categories have scores below $0.75$. These trends suggest an inherent sparseness for visual representation of object categories because the smaller the epitome-score, the sparser the \textit{category-epitome} sketch. If we examine the scores closely, the epitome-scores for some of the categories (\texttt{apple} and \texttt{boomerang}) are $0$. For these categories, the sketches (see Figure \ref{fig:primal-sketches}) are typically drawn such that a dominant stroke (an oval in the vertical plane with a notch at the top for the apple and the chevron-like contour for the boomerang) essentially captures the epitome-ness of the category(See also Equation \ref{episcore}).
The varying lengths of error bars in Figure \ref{fig:primality-with-errorbars} indicates that some object categories may have multiple representative \textit{category-epitome}s rather than a single, unique representative. For example, the sketches of the category (human) \texttt{arm} are likely drawn with a fairly consistent appearance by humans. This consistency influences the sketch classifier and can cause it to produce \textit{category-epitome}s which exhibit a minor amount of variations, thus resulting in a compact distribution of epitome-scores (shorter error bars). In contrast, the variety in sketches of a category such as \texttt{carrot} is reflected in the corresponding \textit{category-epitome}s and by extension, in the longer error bars of its epitome-scores.
\subsection{Epitome-score as a proxy for semantic level of detail}
\label{sec:primality-as-level-of-detail}
A different perspective can be gained by examining categories for a given value of epitome-score. For each category, we count the number of test sketches whose epitome-score exceeds a threshold and normalize by the number of test sketches in the category. To facilitate analysis and avoid visual clutter, we select $4$ prototypical categories whose plot contours occupy the extremities(towards top-left corner and bottom-right corner) of the original plot. In addition, we select $6$ other prototypical categories whose plot contours lie between the extremity plots previously mentioned. The resulting plot can be viewed in Figure \ref{fig:primality-trend-length}.
Epitome-score can be considered as a proxy for semantic level-of-detail. Viewed in this light, the plot from Figure \ref{fig:primality-trend-length} suggests the varying epitome-score budgets across categories -- some categories require a considerable level of detail before their epitomal avatars are revealed (e.g. categories with plots towards the lower right such as \texttt{bridge} and \texttt{bicycle}). On the other hand, categories with plots towards the upper left corner (\texttt{apple}, \texttt{boomerang}) have relatively less stringent demands on level of detail.
To view a larger set of \textit{category-epitome}s, t-SNE\cite{tsne} visualizations of epitomes for select categories and additional results which support the analysis presented in this section, visit \url{http://val.serc.iisc.ernet.in/sketchepitome/se.html} \hspace{1.5mm}.
\section{FUTURE WORK}
\label{sec:conclusion}
A number of directions exist for future work. One obvious direction would be to improve the performance of existing sketch classifier in terms of number of categories as well as accuracy. A well-performing classifier which utilizes fewer training samples translates to a potentially larger set of test \textit{category-epitomes} for analysis. We also intend to compare our current distribution of \textit{category-epitome}s/epitome-scores and related analysis with that obtained when human subjects are asked to identify the cumulative stroke sequences. For this comparison, we plan to use the benchmark sketch database created by Ros\'{a}lia et al.\cite{rosalia} who employ a human-evaluation based technique to identify a subset of $160$ non-ambiguous\footnote{Ros\'{a}lia et al.\cite{rosalia} define a non-ambiguous sketch as one whose identity is agreed upon by at least $2$ people among the subjects surveyed.} object categories from the $250$ originally provided by Eitz et al\cite{eitz}. However, as the number of categories increases, visualizing trends (Figures \ref{fig:primality-with-errorbars} - \ref{fig:primality-trend-length}) becomes a challenge. Therefore, novel visualization methods need to be explored or alternately, the number of categories needs to be curated in a meaningful manner for representative sketch analysis.
\bibliographystyle{IEEEbib}
|
\section{Introduction}
Let $X$ and $Y$ be independent random variables. There are several well known settings in which $U=\psi(X,Y)$ and $V=X+Y$ are also independent. Related characterizations of distributions of $X$ and $Y$ by properties of independence of $X$ and $Y$ and independence of $U$ and $V$ have been also studied. The most prominent seem to be: \begin{itemize}
\item Bernstein (1941) characterization of the normal law by independence of $U=X-Y$ and $V$,
\item Lukacs (1956) characterization of the gamma law by independence of $U=X/Y$ and $V$.
\end{itemize}
In the end of 1990's a new independence phenomenon of this kind, called Matsumoto-Yor property, see e.g. Stirzaker (2005), p. 43, was discovered. It says that for $X$ with a GIG (generalized inverse Gaussian) law and independent $Y$ with a gamma law (both distributions with suitably adjusted parameters), random variables $U=1/X-1/(X+Y)$ and $V$ are independent. This elementary property was identified while the authors analyzed structure of functionals of Brownian motion - see Matsumoto and Yor (2001, 2003). A related characterization of the GIG and gamma laws by independence of $X$ and $Y$ and of $U$ and $V$ was obtained in Letac and Weso\l owski (2000). Both these results: the Matsumoto-Yor property and the characterization were generalized in several directions. Matrix variate analogues were studied e.g. in Letac and Weso\l owski (2000), Weso\l owski (2002) and Massam and Weso\l owski (2006) - the last one including a relation with conditional structure of Wishart matrices. Recently it has been extended to symmetric cones setting in Ko\l odziejek (2014). Multivariate versions related to specific transformations governed by a tree were considered in Barndorff-Nielsen and Koudou (1998), Massam and Weso\l owski (2004) and Koudou (2006) . Further connections with (exponential) Brownian motion were investigated in Weso\l owski and Witkowski (2007) and Matsumoto et al. (2009). There are also regression versions of Matsumoto-Yor typ characterizations, as given in Seshadri and Weso\l owski (2001), Weso\l owski (2002) and Chou and Huang (2004). A survey of these results together with other characterizations of the GIG law can be found in a recent paper Koudou and Ley (2014).
In 2009 Koudou and Vallois tried to generalize Matsumoto-Yor property by a search of distributions of independent $X$ and $Y$ and functions $f$ such that $V=f(X+Y)$ and $U=f(X)-f(X+Y)$ are independent. Their research lead to a discovery of another pair $U=\psi(X,Y)$ and $V=X+Y$ with independence property:
Assume that $X$ and $Y$ are independent random variables, $X$ has the Kummer distribution $\mathrm{K}(a,b,c)$ with the density
$$
f_X(x)\propto \tfrac{x^{a-1}e^{-cx}}{(1+x)^{a+b}}\,I_{(0,\infty)}(x), \qquad a,b,c>0,
$$
and $Y$ has the gamma distribution $\mathrm{G}(b,c)$ with the density
$$
f_Y(y)\propto y^{b-1}e^{-cy}I_{(0,\infty)}(y).
$$
Then, see Koudou and Vallois (2012), random variables
\bel{juvi}
U=\tfrac{1+\tfrac{1}{X+Y}}{1+\tfrac{1}{X}}\qquad \mbox{and}\qquad V=X+Y
\ee
are independent, $U$ has the beta first kind distribution $\mathrm{B}_I(a,b)$ with the density
$$
f_U(u)\propto u^{a-1}(1-u)^{b-1}I_{(0,1)}(u)
$$
and $V$ has the Kummer distribution, $\mathrm{K}(a+b,-b,c)$. (Note that the Kummer distribution $K(\alpha,\beta,\gamma)$ is well-defined iff $\alpha,\gamma>0$ and $\beta\in\R$.)
It is an interesting question if a theory, similar to the one for the original Matsumoto-Yor property described in the literature recalled above, can be developed for this new independence property. There have already been some successful efforts in this direction. The property was extended to matrix variate distributions in Koudou (2012). It is also known, see Koudou and Vallois (2011, 2012), that, under appropriate smoothness assumptions on densities, a characterization counterpart of the property holds: if $X$ and $Y$ are independent positive random variables, and $U$ and $V$, given by \eqref{juvi}, are also independent then $X\sim \mathrm{K}(a,b,c)$ and $Y\sim \mathrm{G}(b,c)$ for some positive constants $a,b,c$. These smoothness restrictions require that the densities of $X$ and $Y$ are strictly positive on $(0,\infty)$ and either twice differentiable or their logarithms are locally integrable. Letac (2009) conjectured that such a characterization is possibly true with no assumptions on densities. In this note we contribute further to this development following the characterization path. Our aim is to show a characterization of the gamma and Kummer laws without referring to densities at all. Actually, we will consider constancy of regressions condition which, up to necessary moment assumption, is weaker than independence.
\section{Regression characterization}
Our main result is a characterization of the Kummer and gamma laws by constancy of regressions of $U$ and $U^{-1}$ given $V$ in the setting described in \eqref{juvi}. Since $U\in(0,1)$ $\P$-a.s. $\E\,U<\infty$, and one can consider conditional moment $\E(U|V)$ without any additional restrictions. This is not the case of $\E(U^{-1}|V)$ since, a priori, the moment $\E\,U^{-1}$ may not be finite. Since
$$
U^{-1}=\tfrac{1+X}{X}\,\tfrac{X+Y}{1+X+Y}\le 1+\tfrac{1}{X}
$$
we have $\E\,U^{-1}\le 1+\E\,X^{-1}$. So, under the assumption $\E\,X^{-1}<\infty$ the conditional moment $\E(U^{-1}|V)$ is well defined.
Now we are ready to state the main result of this note.
\begin{theorem}\label{REG KV}
Let $X$ and $Y$ be independent positive non-degenerate random variables and $\E\,X^{-1}<\infty$. Define $U$ and $V$ through \eqref{juvi}. If
\bel{reg}
\E(U|V)=\alpha \qquad \mbox{and}\qquad \E(U^{-1}|V)=\beta
\ee
for real constants $\alpha$ and $\beta$ then there exists a constant $c>0$ such that $$X\sim \mathrm{K}\left(1+\tfrac{1-\alpha}{\alpha\beta},\tfrac{(1-\alpha)(\beta-1)}{\alpha\beta},c\right)\qquad\mbox{and}\qquad Y\sim\mathrm{G}\left(\tfrac{(1-\alpha)(\beta-1)}{\alpha\beta},\,c\right).$$
\end{theorem}
\begin{proof}
First, rewrite the equations \eqref{reg} as
$$
\E\left(\left.\tfrac{X}{1+X}\right|X+Y\right)=\alpha\tfrac{X+Y}{1+X+Y}\qquad\mbox{and}\qquad
\E\left(\left.\tfrac{1+X}{X}\right|X+Y\right)=\beta\tfrac{1+X+Y}{X+Y}.
$$
Equivalently, we have
\bel{reg1}
\E\left(\left.\tfrac{1}{1+X}\right|X+Y\right)=1-\alpha+\tfrac{\alpha}{1+X+Y}
\ee
and
\bel{reg2}
\E\left(\left.\tfrac{1}{X}\right|X+Y\right)=\beta-1+\tfrac{\beta}{X+Y}.
\ee
The equation \eqref{reg1} implies
\bel{eq1}
\E\,\tfrac{e^{s(1+X+Y)}}{1+X}=(1-\alpha)\E\,e^{s(1+X+Y)}+\alpha\E\,\tfrac{e^{s(1+X+Y)}}{1+X+Y}
\ee
at least for $s\le 0$.
Similarly, from \eqref{reg2} we get the equation
\bel{eq2}
\E\,\tfrac{e^{s(X+Y)}}{X}=(\beta-1)\E\,e^{s(X+Y)}+\beta\E\,\tfrac{e^{s(X+Y)}}{X+Y},\quad s\le 0.
\ee
Differentiating \eqref{eq1} with respect to $s$ (it is possible at least for $s<0$) we obtain
$$
\E\,e^{s(1+X+Y)}+\E\,\tfrac{Y}{1+X}\,e^{s(X+Y+1)}=(1-\alpha)\E\,(1+X+Y)e^{s(1+X+Y)}+\alpha\,\E\,e^{s(X+Y+1)}.
$$
After dividing by $e^s$ both sides of the above equation and canceling the term $\E\,e^{s(X+Y)}$ we arrive at
$$
\E\,\tfrac{e^{sX}}{1+X}\,\E\,Ye^{sY}=(1-\alpha)\left(\E\,Xe^{sX}\,\E\,e^{sY}+\E\,e^{sX}\,\E\,Ye^{sY}\right).
$$
This equation can be written as
\bel{EQ1}
e^{-s}K\,M'=(1-\alpha)(L\,M)',
\ee
where
$$K(s)=\E\,\tfrac{e^{s(1+X)}}{1+X},\qquad L(s)=\E\,e^{sX}\qquad \mbox{and}\qquad M(s)=\E\,e^{sY}.$$
On the other hand differentiating \eqref{eq2} we get
$$
\E\,e^{s(X+Y)}+\E\,\tfrac{Y}{X}\,e^{s(X+Y)}=(\beta-1)\E\,(X+Y)e^{s(X+Y)}+\beta\,\E\,e^{s(X+Y)}.
$$
Consequently,
$$
\E\,\tfrac{e^{sX}}{X}\,\E\,Y\e^{sY}=(\beta-1)\left(\E\,Xe^{sX}\,\E\,e^{sY}+\E\,e^{sX}\,\E\,Ye^{sY}+\E\,e^{sX}\,\E\,e^{sY}\right).
$$
Therefore
\bel{EQ2}
G\,M'=(\beta-1)((L\,M)'+L\,M),
\ee
where
$$
G(s)=\E\,\tfrac{e^{sX}}{X}.
$$
By deriving the formula for $(LM)'$ from \eqref{EQ1} and \eqref{EQ2} get
\bel{EQ}
ae^{-s}\,K\,M'=bG\,M'-L\,M, \ee
with $a=(1-\alpha)^{-1}$ and $b=(\beta-1)^{-1}$. Differentiate \eqref{EQ} to get
$$
-ae^{-s}KM'+ae^{-s}K'M'+ae^{-s}KM''=bG'M'+bGM''-(LM)'.
$$
Note that $G'=L=e^{-s}K'$. Therefore the above equation together with \eqref{EQ1} and \eqref{EQ2}, after multiplying both sides by $M'$ implies
$$
-(LM)'M'+aLM'^2+(LM)'M''=bLM'^2+((LM)'+LM)M''-(LM)'M'
$$
which after cancelations (which are allowed in a left neighborhood of zero) gives
$$
MM''=(a-b)M'^2.
$$
Note that
$$
a-b=\tfrac{1}{1-\alpha}+\tfrac{1}{1-\beta}=\tfrac{2-\alpha-\beta}{(1-\alpha)(1-\beta)}=1+\tfrac{\alpha\beta-1}{(1-\alpha)(\beta-1)}=:1+\tfrac{1}{p}
$$
and due to obvious inequalities: $\alpha<1$, $\beta>1$ and $\alpha\beta>1$, we conclude that $p>0$. Consequently, $Y$ has a gamma distribution $\mathrm{G}(p,\,c)$, where $c$ is a positive constant.
Now we differentiate equation \eqref{EQ2} for $s<0$ getting
$$
b G'M'+bGM''=(LM)''+(LM)'.
$$
Multiplying both sides by $M'$ and using again \eqref{EQ2} we arrive at
$$
bLM'^2+((LM)'+LM)M''=(LM)''M'+(LM)'M'
$$
which yields
$$
L''\tfrac{M'}{M}+L'\left[2\left(\tfrac{M'}{M}\right)^2+\tfrac{M'}{M}-\tfrac{M''}{M}\right]
-L\left[\tfrac{M''}{M}-(1-b)\left(\tfrac{M'}{M}\right)^2\right]=0.
$$
After inserting known values for $M$, $M'$ and $M''$ the above equation transforms into
$$
(c-s)L''(s)+(1-p+c-s)L'(s)-(1+bp)L(s)=0,\qquad s\le 0.
$$
Change the variable $t:=c-s$ and define $N(t)=L(c-t)$. It follows that
$$
tN''(t)+(1-p-t)N'(t)-(1+bp)N(t)=0\qquad t\ge c.
$$
We read two linearly independent solutions of this equation from Abramovitz and Stegun (1965), Ch. 13. One of these solutions is the generalized hypergeometric function $$N(t)=M(1+bp,1-p,t)=_1\hspace{-1mm}F_1(1+bp,1-p,t)$$ which is of the order $e^tt^{(1+p)b}$ for $t\to \infty$, see (13.1.4) in Abramovitz and Stegun (1965), and thus tends to infinity with $s\to-\infty$ and thus $t=c-s\to \infty$. In the case we consider this is impossible since the Laplace transform of negative argument $s$ of positive probability measure has to be bounded. The second solution
$$
N(t)=U(1+bp,1-p,t)=C\int_0^{\infty}\,e^{-tx}\tfrac{x^{bp}}{(1+x)^{p(b+1)+1}}\;dx,
$$
yields
$$
L(s)=C\int_0^{\infty}\,e^{sx}\tfrac{x^{bp}}{(1+x)^{p(b+1)+1}}e^{-cx}\;dx,
$$
which is a Laplace transform of the Kummer $\mathrm{K}(bp+1,p,c)$ distribution.
\end{proof}
\begin{remark}
Recall that $U\sim\mathrm{Beta}_I(1+bp,p)$ and thus $\E\,X^{-1}<\infty$, as expected. Moreover, since $p>1$ then also $\E\,(1-U)^{-1}<\infty$.
\end{remark}
\begin{remark}
It still not clear if independence of $U$ and $V$ for independent, positive and non-degenerate $X$ and $Y$ without any additional assumptions characterizes the gamma and Kummer laws. Theorem 1 answers the question under additional restriction that $\E\,U^{-1}<\infty$.
\end{remark}
\begin{remark}
Since $U$ as defined in \eqref{juvi} is $(0,1)$ valued random variable, without any additional moment assumptions we can write regressions conditions of the form
$$
\E\left(\left.(1-U)^k\right|V\right)=\alpha_k
$$
for some positive $k$'s and $\alpha_k$'s. Obviously, such conditions are weaker than independence. A little of algebra allows to see that the above condition is equivalent to
$$
\E\left(\left.\tfrac{Y^k}{(1+X)^k}\right|X+Y\right)=\alpha_k(X+Y)^k.
$$
However, we failed to prove characterization assuming the above conditions for, say, $k=1,2$.
\end{remark}
\vspace{5mm}\noindent\small {\bf Acknowledgement.} This research has been partially supported by NCN grant No. 2012/05/B/ST1/00554. I am grateful to G. Letac for sending me his unpublished paper on the Kummer distribution.
\vspace{5mm}\noindent
{\bf References}
\begin{enumerate}
\item {\sc Abramovitz, M., Stegun, I.A.} {\em Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs and Mathematical Tables}, National Bureau of Standards, Applied Mathematics Series {\bf 55}, Washington, 1964.
\item {\sc Barndorff-Nielsen, O.E., Koudou, A.E.} Trees with random conductivities and the (reciprocal) inverse Gaussian distribution. {\em Adv. Appl. Probab.} {\bf 30} (1998), 409-424.
\item {\sc Bernstein, S.N.} On a property which characterizes Gaussian distribution. {\em Zap. Leningrad Polytech. Inst.} {\bf 217(3)} (1941), 21-22 (in Russian).
\item {\sc Chou, C.-W, Huang, W.-J.} On characterizations of the gamma and generalized inverse Gaussian distributions. {\em Statist. Probab. Lett.} {\bf 69} (2004), 381-388.
\item {\sc Ko\l odziejek, B.} The Matsumoto-Yor property and its converse on symmetric cones. {\em arXiv} {\bf 1409.5256} (2014), 1-10.
\item {\sc Koudou, A.E.} A link between the Matsumoto-Yor property and an independence property on trees. {\em Statist. Probab. Lett.} {\bf 76} (2006), 1097-1001.
\item {\sc Koudou, A.E.} A Matsumoto-Yor property for Kummer and Wishart matrices. {\em Statist. Probab. Lett.} {\bf 82(11)} (2012), 1903-1907.
\item {\sc Koudou, A.E., Ley, C.} Characterizations of GIG laws: a survey. {\em Probab. Surv.} {\bf 11} (2014), 161-176.
\item {\sc Koudou, A.E., Vallois, P.} Which dsitributions have the Matsumoto-Yor property? {\em Electr. Comm. Probab.} {\bf 16} (2011), 556-566.
\item {\sc Koudou, A.E., Vallois, P.} Independence properties of the Matsumoto-Yor type. {\em Bernoulli} {\bf 18(1)} (2012), 119-136.
\item {\sc Letac, G.} Kummer distributions. {\em Unpublished manuscript} (2009), 1-15.
\item {\sc Letac, G., Weso\l owski, J.} An independence property for the product of GIG and gamma laws. {\em Ann. Probab.} {\bf 28} (2000), 1371-1383.
\item {\sc Lukacs, E.} A characterization of the gamma distribution. {\em Ann. Math. Statist.} {\bf 26} (1955), 319-324.
\item {\sc Massam, H., Weso\l owski, J.} The Matsumoto-Yor property on trees. {\em Bernoulli} {\bf 10} (2004), 685-700.
\item {\sc Massam, H., Weso\l owski, J.} The Matsumoto-Yor property and the structure of the Wishart distribution. {\em J. Mutivar. Anal.} {\bf 97} (2006), 103-123.
\item {\sc Matsumoto, H., Weso\l owski, J., Witkowski, P.} Tree structured independences for exponential Brownian functionals. {\em Stoch. Proc. Appl.} {\bf 119} (2009), 3798-3815.
\item {\sc Matsumoto, H., Yor, M.} An analogue of Pitman's $2M-X$ theorem for exponential Wiener functionals: Part II: The role of the generalized inverse Gaussian laws. {\em Nagoya Math. J.} {\bf 162} (2001), 65-86.
\item {\sc Matsumoto, H., Yor, M.} Interpretation via Brownian motion of some independence properties between GIG and gamma variables. {\em Statist. Probab. Lett.} {\bf 61} (2003), 253-259.
\item {\sc Seshadri, V., Weso\l owski, J.} Mutual characterizations of the gamma and generalized inverse Gaussian laws by constancy of regression. {\em Sankhya, A} {\bf 63} (2001), 107-112.
\item {\sc Stirzaker, D.} {\em Stochastic Processes and Models}, Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford 2005.
\item {\sc Weso\l owski, J.} The Matsumoto-Yor independence property for GIG and gamma laws, revisited. {\em Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc.} {\bf 133} (2002), 153-161.
\item {\sc Witkowski, P., Weso\l owski, J.} Hitting times of Brownian motion and the Matsumoto-Yor property on trees. {\em Stoch. Proc. Appl.} {\bf 117} (2007), 1303-1315.
\end{enumerate}
\end{document}
|
\section{Introduction}
A variety of electronic solids settle into equilibrium states that spontaneously break the translational symmetry of the underlying crystal \cite{monceau}. Well known examples are Charge Density Wave (CDW) and Spin Density Wave (SDW) orders where either the electron's charge or its spin forms a frozen periodically oscillating pattern. Density wave order has been found in conventional metals as well as in strongly correlated systems such as the underdoped cuprates, iron pnictides, and organic materials, and are intertwined with many other fascinating phenomena such as for instance high temperature superconductivity.
It has long been recognized that density wave orders of various kinds are strongly sensitive to the presence of impurities. There is a large literature on the fascinating effects of quenched disorder on charge density wave systems.
In contrast, despite the common occurrence of spin density wave ordering, surprisingly little attention has been devoted to impurity effects on SDW systems, and this is the subject of this paper.
It is important to distinguish between \emph{collinear} SDWs where the spin orientation oscillates in space along a fixed common direction and \emph{spiral} SDWs where the spin rotates around an axis as a function of space while the magnitude $|\vec S(\vect r)|$ is constant. Both kinds of SDW order break both spin-rotation and lattice translation symmetries, but the latter retains a combination of the two as a symmetry. As a consequence, disorder effects on collinear SDWs are stronger and are the focus of our study.
We show that weak non-magnetic disorder transforms the SDW state into a new glassy state of matter---distinct from the conventional spin glass---which we dub the SDW glass (see Fig. \ref{fig:sdw1}). In addition to the characteristics of a conventional spin glass, i.e. the presence of locally frozen moments but absence of long-range spin order, the SDW glass spontaneously breaks spin-rotation symmetry and hosts an associated Goldstone mode (see Fig. \ref{fig:sdw2}).
\begin{figure}[ht]
\includegraphics[width=0.8\columnwidth]{sdwglass.pdf}
\caption{Magnetic moments in the ground state of the SDW glass. The disorder pins the domain walls into a random configuration, but the structure of `anti-phase' domain walls persists. Upon crossing of each domain wall, the local magnetization changes sign. Thus the disordered state inherits the collinear structure from the parent SDW, where the axis along which the moments point is selected sponteneously, breaking the spin rotation symmetry. }
\label{fig:sdw1}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure}[ht]
\includegraphics[width=0.8\columnwidth]{goldstone.pdf}
\caption{Goldstone mode in the SDW glass. The configuration of the domain walls is identical to the ground state, but the orientation of the moments slowly varies in space}
\label{fig:sdw2}
\end{figure}
Questions closely related to the ones we study arise in considering the effects of impurities on Pair Density Wave (PDW) superconductors of the kind proposed to be realized in the high temperature superconductor $La_{2-x}Ba_xCu_2O_4$ (see Ref.~\onlinecite{fktrev} for a recent review). These are superconducting states where the pair amplitude is modulated in space. Such states were originally conceived by Larkin and Ovchinnikov\cite{LO} when considering the effects of a Zeeman magnetic field on an s-wave superconductor (closely related states were considered by Fulde and Ferrell\cite{FF}). Motivated by the phenomenology observed in $La_{2-x}Ba_xCu_2O_4$, Refs.~\onlinecite{bfk,bfkt} proposed that a PDW state is realized at zero magnetic field in this system. Its microscopic origin remains to be understood. Like the analogous SDW order, the PDW state is also expected to be strongly sensitive to impurities. Refs.~\onlinecite{bfk,bfkt} suggested that disorder necessarily introduces half-quantum ($hc/4e$) vortices leading to broken time reversal symmetry. We revisit this issue and find
that in the phase analogous to the SDW glass, such vortices will not be induced by weak disorder and that time reversal symmetry is preserved.
A fluctuating version of the PDW state also appears as a `mother' state that controls the
physics of the pseudogap regime in the cuprates in a recently proposed theory \cite{amperean}.
\section{SDW and PDW: Order parameters and topological defects}
\label{optd}
For simplicity we focus initially on a unidirectional collinear SDW at wave-vector $\vect Q$ in which the spin oscillates as
\begin{align}
\vec S(\vect r) = S_0\cos \(\vect Q \cdot \vect r\)\vec N\label{eq:sdw},
\end{align}
where $\vec N$ is a real unit vector and $S_0$ is the amplitude. We further assume that $\vect Q$ is incommensurate with the crystalline lattice. Such SDW order is sometimes also referred to as a `spin stripe'. A simple Landau argument shows that this pattern of spin ordering induces CDW order at wave vector $2\vect Q$:
\begin{align}
\rho_\text{CDW} \sim \rho^0_{2\vect Q} \cos \(2\vect Q \cdot \vect r\)\label{eq:scdw}
\end{align}
To discuss situations in which the SDW order is fluctuating (either due to quenched disorder or due to thermal/quantum fluctuations) we write the spin as
\begin{equation}
\vec S(\vect r) \approx S_0 \cos(\vect Q \cdot \vect r + \theta(\vect r) )\vec N.
\end{equation}
$\theta$ describes the phase of the SDW (or the stripe displacement, in the stripe picture). We take both $\theta$ and $\vec N$ to be space (and possibly time) dependent but varying on length scales long compared to the SDW wavelength. The fluctuating SDW order parameter near wave vector $\pm \vect Q$ is thus
\begin{equation}
\vec S_{\pm \vect Q}(\vect x) =S_0 e^{\pm i\theta(\vect x) } \vec N(\vect x).
\end{equation}
The corresponding fluctuating CDW order parameter is
\begin{equation}
\rho_{\pm 2\vect{Q}} = \rho^0_{2\vect Q} e^{\pm 2i\theta}.
\end{equation}
It is useful to formulate discussions of fluctuations in terms of the two separate fields $b \equiv e^{i\theta}$ and $\vec N$. Both the SDW order parameter $\vec S_{\vect Q} \sim b \vec N$ and the CDW order parameter $\rho_{2 \vect Q} \sim b^2$ are composites made out of $b$ and $\vec N$. Clearly the $b, \vec N$ representation has a $\mathbb{Z}_2$ gauge redundancy under $b \rightarrow -b, \vec N \rightarrow -\vec N$ so that neither of them are directly physical \cite{zaanen,ks,ssmor,short,long}. The SDW/CDW order parameters are of course gauge invariant.
Let us now turn to the closely analogous PDW state (sometimes called a striped superconductor or the Larkin-Ovchinnikov phase). This is a superconductor in which the pair wave function $\Delta$ is modulated in space:
\begin{equation}
\Delta(\vect r) = \Delta_0 \cos(\vect Q \cdot \vect r)
\end{equation}
This too will induce CDW order at wave vector $2\vect Q$. When fluctuating we may write
\begin{equation}
\Delta(\vect r) \approx \Delta_0 \cos(\vect Q \cdot \vect r + \theta (\vect r))e^{i\phi(\vect r)}
\end{equation}
The Fourier components of $\Delta(\vect r)$ near $\pm \vect Q$ are thus $\sim e^{i(\phi \pm \theta)}$. There is again a $\mathbb{Z}_2$ gauge redundancy under $\theta \rightarrow \theta + \pi, \phi \rightarrow \phi + \pi$.
The PDW state is thus conceptually very similar to a SDW state with just $XY$ spin symmetry. However there is an important difference in the action of time reversal symmetry. The PDW state preserves time reversal while the SDW breaks it. Formally this is because the $U(1)$ charge conservation symmetry (broken in the SC) does not commute with time reversal while spin rotations do. Nevertheless we will consider both orders within the same framework.
Unless otherwise specified we will phrase our discussion in terms of SDW order.
The structure of topological defects in these density wave states\cite{zaanen,ks,ssmor,short,long} will play a crucial role below. Of particular importance are dislocations in the CDW pattern. These are line defects in 3D and point defects in 2D around which $\theta$ winds. The `elementary' strength-$1$ dislocation where the CDW phase $2\theta$ winds by $2\pi$ requires that $\vec N$ winds by $\pi$ so that the SDW order $e^{i\theta}\vec N$ is single valued. In contrast strength-$2$ dislocations have $2\theta$ wind by $4\pi$ without any winding of $\vec N$.
Exactly the same considerations also apply in the superconducting context as described in Refs.~\onlinecite{bfk,agterberg,leo}. It is interesting to consider the physical interpretation of the various topological defects in this case. The strength-$1$ CDW dislocation now requires that the superconducting phase $\phi$ wind by $\pi$. This corresponds to a superconducting vortex with magnetic flux $\frac{hc}{4e}$, {\em i.e} half the usual flux quantum. Strength-$2$ CDW dislocations in contrast do not bind to superconducting vortices.
\section{Impurities: Models and preliminaries}
We want to consider the fate of the SDW in the presence of weak non-magnetic impurities. Such impurities lead to a random potential $V(\vect x)$ that couples linearly to the CDW order parameter, i.e.
\begin{align}
H_\text{dis.} = \vect F(\vect x) \cdot \vect \nabla \theta + V_{2 \vect Q}^*(\vect x) e^{2i \theta} + V_{2 \vect Q}(\vect x) e^{-2i \theta}\label{eq:dis},
\end{align}
The first term couples to the long wavelength part of the charge density (with $\vect F$ random) and the second to the density near the ordering wave vector. Here $V_{2 \vect Q}(\vect x) = \int_{\vect q \approx 2 \vect Q} e^{i \vect q \cdot \vect x}V(\vect q)$. There is however no linear coupling to the primary SDW order parameter.
The impurity coupling is captured by a simple lattice model:
\begin{align}
H =& - \frac{J}{2} \sum_{<ij>} \vec S_{\vect Q i}^* \cdot \vec S_{\vect Q j } e^{i\eta_{ij}} - \frac{v}{2}\sum_i\rho_{2 \vect Q _i}e^{-i \alpha_i} + c.c \nonumber \\
= & -J\sum_{<ij>} \vec N_i \cdot \vec N_j \cos(\theta_i - \theta_j + \eta_{ij}) \nonumber \\
& - v\sum_i \cos(2\theta_i - \alpha_i) \label{eqn:firstmodel}
\end{align}
Here $\alpha_i, \eta_{ij}$ are random uncorrelated variables. Other equivalent lattice models may be formulated and are described in the Appendix \ref{app.model}.
As is well known\cite{larkin,imryma} the `random field' disorder destroys LRO in the CDW for physical dimensions $d < 4$. The elastic energy cost of adjusting to disorder over a scale $L$ scales as $L^{d-2}$ while the energy gain due to the disorder potential scales as $L^{d/2}$, thus the latter dominates for $d<4$. As a consequence, beyond a length scale (known as the Larkin length) $\xi_L \sim (J/v)^{2/(4-d)}$ long range CDW order is destroyed. This immediately implies the absence of long range SDW order as well (as long range SDW order if present would have induced CDW order). At distances longer than $\xi_L$ the disordered SDW enters a phase of matter that we dub the SDW glass and whose physics we describe below.
\section{SDW glasses in 3d}\label{sec.3d}
We begin our analysis in $d=3$ dimensions by reviewing the physics of pinned CDW systems. In pioneering work, Ref.~\onlinecite{GLD94} proposed that at weak disorder the pinned CDW enters an `elastic glass' phase where long dislocation loops do not occur. This has been substantiated by numerical calculations\cite{huse} and by general scaling arguments\cite{fisher}. The resulting state is described by a random field XY model for the CDW order parameter where dislocations are suppressed. Many approximate treatments, notably a sophisticated Functional Renormalization Group (FRG) calculation\cite{fish,GLD94}, show that the CDW order parameter develops {\em power law} correlations:
\begin{equation}
\overline{\rho_{2\vect Q}^*(\vect x)\rho_{2\vect Q}(\vect x')} \sim \frac{1}{|\vect x - \vect x'|^{d_c}}
\end{equation}
The exponent $d_c$ is universal. To leading order in the $\epsilon$ expansion, $d_c = \frac{\pi^2\epsilon}{9}$. Thus for $d = 3$, $d_c$ is estimated to be $\approx 1.1$. The power law decay of the spatial CDW correlations implies power-law Bragg peaks in the CDW structure factor
\begin{align}
S_\text{CDW}(2\vect Q+ \delta \vect q) \sim |\delta \vect q|^{d_c -3},
\end{align}
The elastic glass phase is therefore also known as the `Bragg glass' phase.
Let us now consider the implications for the SDW order. The impurities do not couple linearly to $\vec N$ but will lead to random exchange energies (`random bond disorder'). However the absence of dislocations in $\theta$ means that there is no frustration of the collinear ordering of $\vec N$. Thus at weak disorder $\vec N$ will continue to have true long range order. The SDW order will has power law correlations inherited from the correlations of $e^{i\theta}$.
\begin{eqnarray}
\overline{\vec S_{\bf Q}^*({\bf x}) \cdot
\vec S_{\bf Q}({\bf x'})} & = & \overline{e^{i\theta({\bf x})} e^{-i\theta({\bf x'})} \vec N({\bf x}) \cdot \vec N({\bf x'})} \nonumber \\
& \sim & \overline{e^{i\theta({\bf x})} e^{-i\theta({\bf x'})}} \nonumber \\
& \sim & \frac{1}{|{\bf x} - {\bf x'}|^{d_s}} \nonumber
\end{eqnarray}
The exponent $d_s$ can be estimated within the FRG in $d = 4-\epsilon$. At leading order in the $\epsilon$ expansion we have $d_s = \frac{\pi^2 \epsilon}{36}$. This is $\frac{1}{4}$ of the CDW exponent $d_c$, as the probability distribution for $\theta$ is Gaussian to this order (for a recent discussion see Ref.~\onlinecite{fedetal14}). This gives the estimate $d_s \approx 0.27$ in $d = 3$. However beyond leading order the distribution will not be Gaussian\cite{fedetal14}, and hence in general $d_s \neq \frac{d_c}{4}$. Note that the SDW correlations decay much slower than the CDW correlations. This is expected since the CDW order is the one directly affected by the disorder.
Correspondingly, the spin structure factor exhibits power law Bragg peaks
\begin{align}
S_\text{SDW}(\vect Q+ \delta \vect q) \sim |\delta \vect q|^{d_s-3}.
\label{3dsdwgsfc}
\end{align}
This power law Bragg peak should be visible in neutron diffraction measurements on weakly disordered SDW materials.
But what does it mean for $\vec N$ to be ordered? $\vec N$ is not gauge invariant and hence not directly observable. However ordering of $\vec N$ implies ordering of the spin quadrupole moment
\begin{equation}
Q_{\alpha\beta} = N_\alpha N_\beta - \frac{\delta_{\alpha \beta}}{3} \vec N^2
\end{equation}
Thus even though the SDW order is destroyed long range spin quadrupole order (also known as spin nematic order) is preserved. The system develops spontaneous spin anisotropy without long range SDW ordering.
This SDW glass phase has a simple physical description. The spins are frozen in time but the phase of the SDW is randomly disordered in space. The spin nematic order means that the spins retain a common axis along which they randomly point up or down. The freezing of the spins means that there is a non-zero Edwards-Anderson spin glass order parameter
\begin{align}
q_\text{EA}\equiv&\lim \limits_{t \rightarrow \infty} \overline{\langle \vec S(\vect x,0)\cdot \vec S(\vect x,t) \rangle}\\
=& \lim \limits_{t \rightarrow \infty} \langle \cos \(\theta(\vect x,t)-\theta(\vect x,0)\)\rangle \langle \vec N \rangle^2\neq 0,
\end{align}
The disordered SDW is thus a uni-axial spin glass in a Heisenberg spin system with the axis of spin orientation determined spontaneously. It is clearly distinct from the conventional Heisenberg spin glass.
The spin nematic order in the SDW glass phase leads to propagating Goldstone modes (nematic director waves). The structure of magnetic moments characteristic for the ground state and for a soft excitation are shown in Figs. \ref{fig:sdw1},\ref{fig:sdw2}. This should be contrasted with the Halperin-Saslow\cite{halperinsaslow} spin wave modes in a Heisenberg spin glass which are typically damped.
\begin{figure}[ht]
\includegraphics[width=0.8\columnwidth]{bglass.pdf}
\caption{In the SDW Bragg glass, the anti-phase domain walls are pinned in a configuration without dislocations.}
\label{fig:sdw3}
\end{figure}
The SDW glass exhibits striking differences from conventional spin glasses when placed in a weak magnetic field. Specifically, we will contrast the SDW glass to a Heisenberg spin glass (HSG) given by
\begin{align}
H_\text{HSG} = \sum_{\vect x \vect y}J_{\vect x,\vect y}\vec S_{\vect x} \cdot \vec S_{\vect y},
\end{align}
where $J_{\vect x,\vect y}$ are random exchange couplings. Recall that in the absence of disorder, a collinear SDW aligns itself perpendicular to the applied field, with a slight canting of the moments, like an antiferromagnet. In the isotropic SDW glass, the canting is achieved by a rotation of $\vec N$. This corresponds to a fast (Goldstone) mode and therefore \emph{does not} exhibit slow (glassy) dynamics. In the HSG such a fast mode does not exist and the time scales for adjusting to the field are necessarily long.\\
For an anisotropic SDW glass $\vec N$ remains pinned to a specific direction in a weak enough magnetic field, and the system can only respond via the slow dynamics of $e^{i \theta}$. The cross-over value of the magnetic field $B_c$ between fast and slow dynamics is thus given by the strength of the anisotropy. In the HSG, a similar cross-over occurs, but at a much larger scale, determined by the typical exchange coupling $J$.\\
The same analysis presented here for the SDW also applies for a PDW. The analog of the spin nematic order parameter is a uniform charge-4$e$ superconducting order $\Delta_{4e}$. However we are not aware of any system that is proposed to host a PDW at zero magnetic field in $d=3$ dimensions. Our results should be pertinent though to Larkin-Ovchinikov pairing induced by a magnetic field in three dimensional superconductors. The breaking of time reversal allows additional terms in the Hamiltonian, in particular a linear coupling between the gradients of the phases of CDW and the condensate, i.e. in the continuum limit
\begin{align}
H_B = \lambda \int_{\vect x} \vect \nabla \phi \cdot \vect \nabla \theta
\end{align}
However, the PDW glass phase is perturbatively stable against such a term. Clearly the ground state in the absence of disorder is unaffected by $H_B$ for small $\lambda$. In the presence of disorder, at long distances $L \gg \xi_L$, $H_B$ contributes to the random bond energy for the charge-4$e$ superconducting order parameter $\Delta_{4e}$, which is irrelevant in the PDW glass where $\langle \Delta_{4e}\rangle\neq 0$. The same conclusion can be readily obtained through an FRG analysis (see Appendix \ref{app.fflofrg}).
\section{SDW and PDW glasses in 2d}
We now turn to $d=2$. Once again the random field will destroy long range CDW and hence long range SDW order. The fate of dislocations is however more subtle.
In the simpler problem of the 2D random field XY model (appropriate to describe unidirectional CDW ordering not derived from a more primary SDW or PDW order), topological defects always proliferate at long scales, leading to exponentially decaying correlations. These defects cost elastic energy which must be balanced against the energy gain due to the random correlated potential induced by the random field. Refs.~\onlinecite{zlf99,lg00} show that at long enough scales the optimized potential energy for introducing vortices dominates so that it is always favorable to nucleate defects.
In the SDW system, single and doubled CDW dislocations have different elastic cost---the energy of the former depends on the stiffness associated with spin distortions while the energy of the latter does not. Hence they could potentially behave very differently. While one expects that doubled dislocations are always generated at long length scales the fate of isolated single dislocations is less clear.
Let us first describe a putative state where doubled dislocations have proliferated but single ones have not. In such a state the CDW correlations, and hence the SDW correlations decay exponentially. Despite that there is long range spin nematic order. Thus this is a 2D SDW glass phase with coexisting spin nematic order.
It is particularly interesting to note the meaning of these issues in the PDW context. The analog of the spin nematic then is a uniform charge-4$e$ superconductor. Further (see Section \ref{optd}) a strength-$1$ CDW dislocation is bound to a $\pi$ winding of the SC phase. This corresponds to a half-quantum vortex with $\frac{hc}{4e}$ flux. Clearly two different dislocations of this kind are possible depending on whether the flux is positive or negative. Any such single dislocation necessarily breaks time reversal symmetry. Thus if disorder nucleates these single dislocations then the PDW glass will break time reversal spontaneously by generating randomly placed $\pm \frac{hc}{4e}$ half-quantum vortices of either sign. Such vortices can be imaged using local probes of magnetism such as a scanning SQUID microscope, and can serve as a key experimental test of the proposed PDW state in $La_{2-x}Ba_xCu_2O_4$.
We therefore now pose the question of whether such single dislocations are {\em necessarily} generated at {\em weak} disorder in either the SDW or PDW system.
For simplicity and to provide a unified discussion of both SDW and PDW systems, we will specialize to XY spins. The fate of dislocations may be discussed within an appropriate elastic model which takes the form
\begin{align}
H = &\int d^2 x \frac{K_s}{2} (\vect \nabla \phi)^2+\frac{K_c}{2} (\vect \nabla \theta - \vect f)^2 - v \cos \(2 \theta - \alpha\)\label{eq.h2d}
\end{align}
Here $K_c, K_s$ are the stiffnesses of the CDW and SDW (or PDW) order parameters respectively. The phase of the SDW (or PDW) order parameter is $\phi \pm \theta$, and that of the CDW order parameter is $2\theta$. The disorder is taken to be delta-correlated $\overline{f_i(\vect x) f_j(\vect y)} = D_F \delta_{ij}\delta(\vect x - \vect y)$, $\overline{\alpha(\vect x) \alpha(\vect y)}=\delta(\vect x - \vect y)$. Eq. (\ref{eq.h2d}) is the basis for our analysis of dislocations in the rest of this section.
The $\theta$ sector is again described by an $XY$ model with random anisotropy. However, in this case there is no stable dislocation free phase even for weak disorder. We will begin with discussions by reviewing some basic facts on this model:
In the case of random forces ({i.e} the $\vect f$ term), but without random fields, the relative displacement $\theta_{\vect x}-\theta_{\vect x'} $ grows logarithmically with distance, with a coefficient given by the variance $D_F$ of the random force \cite{fisher}. The energy cost of the cheapest dislocation is\cite{natter} $E \sim K_c(1 - \sqrt{D_F/D_F^c})\log L$, i.e. there is a critical strength $D_F^c$ of the random force, below which no isolated dislocations are present in the ground state.
In the presence of random fields but with dislocations excluded, $D_F$ is renormalized without bound\cite{co} as $D_F = C \log L$. The coefficient $C$ is temperature dependent. This implies
\begin{align}
\overline{\langle \theta_{\vect x} - \theta_{\vect x'} \rangle^2} \sim \log^2|\vect x - \vect x'|.
\end{align}
Thus $C_{n}(\vect r)= \overline{\left\langle e^{i n\theta({\bf x + \vect r})} e^{-i n \theta({\bf x})}\right \rangle}$ decays faster than any power law, and the associated Bragg peaks are indistinguishable from the case of short-range correlations.
When dislocations are allowed, they always become relevant\cite{fisher,lg00} for large enough $L$ since $D_F(L)\sim \log L > D_F^c$. Beyond the scale where dislocations proliferate, $C_{n}(\vect r)$ decays exponentially.
\begin{figure}[ht]
\includegraphics[width=0.8\columnwidth]{schematic.pdf}
\caption{Schematic phase diagram for a disordered SDW (or PDW) in 2D as a function of disorder strength $v$ and the ratio $K_s/K_c$ of the stiffnesses associated with spin waves / phonons in the absence of disorder}
\label{fig:phases}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure*}[ht]
\includegraphics[width=17cm]{bigfig.pdf}
\caption{Summary of numerical data. Left: Spatial decay of the correlations functions $C_\text{Nematic}$ and $C_\text{CDW}$. The inset shows a $\log-\log$ plot of the same data. Combined error due to sampling and disorder averaging is below the size of the shown data points. The qualitative feature that nematic correlations decay much slower than CDW correlations is generic for low temperatures and weak disorder. Center: Temperature dependence of the spin-nematic correlation length $\xi_\text{Nematic}$ shown for parameters corresponding to a SDW glass phase (green) or a fully disorderd phase (purple) at low temperatures. For the first set of parameters, $\xi_\text{Nematic}$ grows rapidly as temperature is lowered, indicating a phase transition into the SDW glass phase. For the second set of parameters, $\xi_N$ shows no sign of divergence and is expected to saturate at a finite value such that the low temperature glassy phase is smoothly connected to the high temperature phase. Solid lines are drawn as a guide to the eye. Right: The stiffness $\rho_N$ for spin nematic fluctuations, as a function of system size shown for both the SDW glass and the fully disordered phase. In the SDW glass ($\kappa_c = -0.1 \kappa_s$), $\rho_N$ depends only weakly on system size $L$ and always takes a finite value, while for $\kappa_c = 0.1 \kappa_s$ it exhibits substantial sample dependence and rapidly decays with system size.}\label{fig.bigfig}
\end{figure*}
The analysis in Appendix \ref{app.scales} shows that single dislocations proliferate at a scale
\begin{equation}
\xi_V^{(1)} \approx
\xi_L e^{\sqrt{\frac{\pi}{16 C }( 1 +
K_s/K_c )^2\log \xi_L/a} }
\end{equation}
Doubled dislocations on the other hand proliferate at a different length scale
\begin{equation}
\xi_V^{(2)} \approx
\xi_L e^{\sqrt{\frac{\pi}{4 C }\log \xi_L/a}}
\end{equation}
It follows that for large $\frac{K_s}{K_c}$ strength-$2$ dislocations proliferate at a shorter length scale. In that case the physics for distances longer than $\xi_V^{(2)}$ is modified from that described by the elastic model. The prevalence of doubled dislocations renormalizes $K_c$ to zero without affecting $K_s$. The net energy cost of the spin distortion associated with a strength-$1$ dislocation is then $\frac{\pi}{4} K_s \ln (\frac{\xi_L}{a})$ but now the optimal potential energy gain of the dislocation will just be a constant (see Appendix \ref{app.gauge}). Thus in this case strength-$1$ dislocations are suppressed even at the longest length scales. In the SDW glass this implies that spin nematic long range order survives at weak disorder in this regime. In the PDW glass in this regime time reversal is preserved and the disorder does not introduce half-quantum vortices. Rather there is true long range order in the charge-$4e$ superconducting order parameter.
In the opposite regime of large $\frac{K_c}{K_s}$ single dislocations will proliferate first even at weak disorder. In either regime at strong disorder single dislocations will proliferate.
The schematic phase diagram is shown in Fig. \ref{fig:phases}.
\subsection{Numerics}
To support the arguments presented above we performed Monte-Carlo simulations of the Hamiltonian
\small
\begin{align}
H_\text{MC}=&-\kappa_c\sum_{\langle ij\rangle} \cos (2\theta_{i} - 2\theta_j+2\eta_{ij}) \nonumber\\
& - \kappa_s \sum_{\langle ij \rangle}\cos (\theta_i - \theta_j+\eta_{ij})\cos (\phi_i - \phi_j)\nonumber\\
& +v\sum_{i} \cos \(2\theta_i + \alpha_i)\)\label{eq:num}.
\end{align}
\normalsize
where $\langle\vect r,\vect r'\rangle$ denotes nearest neighbors on a square lattice, $\alpha(\vect r)$ is a uniform random variable for each site and $\eta_{r,r'}$ is a gaussian random variable for each link with variance $D_F$. We note that $\eta_{r,r'}$ is generated under renormalization and does not need to be explicitly added to the Hamiltonian. However, it is convenient for studying the case of weak random field. There, the large difference between $\xi_L$ and $\xi_V$ makes numerical simulations challenging. Taking $D_F \lesssim D_F^c$ significantly reduces $\xi_V$ while otherwise retaining the same physics as the $D_F=0$ model.
Configurations were generated using the standard Hybrid Monte Carlo algorithm\cite{hmc}. The correlations functions
\begin{align}
C_\text{CDW}(i,j)=\langle \exp \(2 i \theta_i - 2 i \theta_j \) \rangle\\
C_\text{Nematic}(i,j)=\langle \exp \(2 i \phi_i - 2 i \phi_j \) \rangle
\end{align}
were measured, as well as the nematic stiffness parameter $\rho_N$, i.e. the response of the free energy $F$ to a twist $\Phi$ in the boundary conditions for $\phi$:
\begin{align}
\rho_N = \frac{1}{\kappa_s + 4 \kappa_c}\frac{\partial^2}{\partial \Phi^2}F(\Phi)\big|_{\Phi=0}, \label{eqn.rhon}
\end{align}
where in the absence of disorder, $\lim \limits_{T \rightarrow 0} \rho_s =1$. $\rho_N$ was obtained directly as a non-local correlations function on systems with periodic boundary conditions. The data is summarized in Fig. \ref{fig.bigfig}.
As expected, equilibration becomes difficult to achieve at low temperatures due to slow glassly dynamics, putting severe constraints on the achievable system sizes. We ensured that equilibration is indeed achieved by using three different initializations and confirming that the measurements are independent of this choice. We took (i) disordered configuration with $\phi,\theta$ completely random, (ii) ordered configuration with $\langle e ^{i \theta}\rangle = \langle e ^{i \phi}\rangle \neq 0 $, (iii) an `annealing' protocol where the temperature is successively lowered towards the target value.
\paragraph{Correlation functions}-- Typical results for the two correlations functions $C_\text{CDW}$ and $C_\text{Nematic}$ are shown in Fig. \ref{fig.bigfig} (left) for $\beta \kappa_s =10\beta v=5$, $\kappa_c=v$ measured for 15 disorder realizations on a system of size $160 \times 160$. For these system sizes, the spatial correlations exhibit very little sample dependence, and the combined error due to sampling and disorder averaging is smaller than the symbols used to plot the data. More generally, $C_\text{CDW}$ always exhibits rapid exponential decay at low temperatures and moderately weak disorder strength, while $C_\text{Nematic}$ decays much slower. Depending on the parameters $C_\text{Nematic}$ can also be exponential, or follow a power-law up to achievable system sizes.
\paragraph{Temperature dependent correlation length}-- At moderate temperatures, $C_\text{Nematic}$ is always follows an exponential decay with a temperature dependent correlations length $\xi_N$, shown in Fig. \ref{fig.bigfig} (center) for both $\kappa_c = -0.1 \kappa_s$ (SDW glass) and for $\kappa_c = 0.1 \kappa_s$ (fully disordered). At high temperatures $\xi_N(\kappa_c=0.1 \kappa_s) > \xi_N(\kappa_c=-0.1 \kappa_s)$, as would be the case for $v=0$ (no disorder). As temperature is lowered, disorder becomes important and affects the relative size of the $\xi_N$. For parameters corresponding to a SDW glass phase at lower temperatures, $\xi_N$ diverges. For parameters where single dislocations eventually proliferate, the correlation length shows no sign of divergence.
\paragraph{Helicity modulus}-- The stiffness parameter $\rho_N$ as defined in Eq.(\ref{eqn.rhon}) provides a sharp distinction between the two low temperature phase. A non-zero value for $\rho_N$ in the thermodynamic limit is a characteristic feature of the SDW glass phase while in the fully disordered phase where all vortices have proliferated $\lim \limits_{L \rightarrow \infty}\rho_N=0$. Results for the stiffness are shown in Fig. \ref{fig.bigfig} (right) for $\beta \kappa_s =10\beta v=5$, $\kappa_c=\pm v$. In the SDW phase, $\rho_N$ exhibits little variation between different samples and approaches a finite value at the largest system sized that we considered. In the phase where single dislocations proliferate, $\rho_N$ fluctuates strongly from sample to sample, around an average that rapidly decays with increasing system size.
Despite the limitations on sample size, the result of our simulations are fully consistent with the analytical predictions. In particular we find that depending on our choice of parameters, the system exhibits qualitatively different behavior, corresponding to two different phases at low temperatures---the SDW glass phase which we introduce here, and a more conventional glassy state where all correlations decay exponentially. We expect that these conclusions remain valid for $L \rightarrow \infty$ and $T \rightarrow 0$.
\section{Discussion}
Our results should be pertinent to a wide variety of systems. Below we highlight a few specific interesting examples.
SDW ordering is very common in electronic solids, and is often incommensurate with the underlying lattice. The classic example\cite{chreview} is elemental Chromium $Cr$. There have been several studies of the suppression of SDW order in $Cr$ when it is alloyed with other transition metal elements (see Refs.~\onlinecite{rosenbaum,minhae} and references therein), for instance Vanadium $V$. At low $V$ concentrations where the disorder is weak, we expect our results to apply directly and predict the occurrence of the 3D SDW glass phase. Consequently the static spin structure factor is a power law (Eqn. \ref{3dsdwgsfc}), potentially visible in high resolution neutron diffraction studies.
The SDW glass offers an interesting experimental opportunity to probe the physics of the 3D Bragg glass in magnetic systems. The original theoretical proposal\cite{GLD94,giam} of the Bragg glass phase spurred a search for it in a few experimental systems, notably in vortex matter inside superconductors (for a review see Ref.~\onlinecite{giambhatt}). Ref.~\onlinecite{klein} provided
evidence for the predicted power law Bragg peaks in a disordered vortex lattice through small angle neutron scattering . Experimental evidence for Bragg glass physics in CDW systems seems scarce---probably due to the strong coupling to disorder of the CDW order parameter. Recently however Scanning Tunneling Microscopy images of the quasi-two dimensional CDW ordered system $NbSe_2$ have been interpreted\cite{pasupathy} in terms of a Bragg glass picture which might describe intermediate length scale physics. SDW systems of the kind considered in this paper
offer a different context for Bragg glass physics which may be more directly amenable to experimental studies.
We emphasize that the SDW glass is distinct from the conventional Heisenberg spin glass. The SDW glass is also distinct from the `cluster spin glass' which macroscopically is the same phase as the usual spin glass. It is interesting that even some `classic' metallic spin glasses\cite{mydosh,binderyoung} (for instance $CuMn$) actually have substantial short range SDW order\cite{mydosh} (visible in neutron diffraction as a well defined finite wave vector peak). Physically these are usefully understood as obtained from local pinning of SDW fluctuations of elemental $Cu$ around $Mn$ impurities. A useful theoretical approach to understanding these systems may be to start with the SDW glass described in this paper and then to disrupt it with topological defects at long length scales.
Turning to $2d$ systems, it is interesting to consider the very lightly doped cuprates within the framework of our results. At low-$T$, these have long been reported to have spin glass order but also show substantial coexisting SDW correlations\cite{keimer}. As we have argued if the `parent' SDW order is uniaxial ({\em i.e} not a spiral) then two distinct kinds of glassy states are possible in both of which the SDW correlations decay exponentially on long scales. When only doubled dislocations of the accompanying CDW are induced (the 2D SDW glass phase), spin nematic order persists. If however single dislocations are also induced the resulting phase is smoothly connected to the conventional spin glass.
What experiments can help distinguish between these two phases? As we discussed they will have rather similar peaks in neutron diffraction. More telling will be local probes of the spin dynamics for instance through NMR. The local dynamic spin susceptibility in the SDW glass phase should behave similarly to that in an ordered antiferromagnet (as the $\theta$ field is frozen the spin auto-correlation is determined entirely by $\vec N$), and will not show very striking glassy effects. In contrast there will be a wide range of relaxation times in a conventional spin glass.
For PDW order the main proposed candidate to date are the cuprates, notably $La_{2-x}Ba_xCu_2O_4$. Close to $x = \frac{1}{8}$, there is an interesting window of temperatures between $4 K$ and $16 K$ where the in-plane resistivity is immeasurably small while there is a non-zero $c$-axis resistivity\cite{fktrev}. Further the Meissner effect itself onsets only below $4 K$. It has been suggested that this behavior may be explained by a PDW order pinned by impurities, and with frustrated $c$-axis Josephson coupling. Our results show that there are two possible fates of the PDW at weak disorder. In the PDW glass phase there are no frozen disorder-induced superconducting vortices. Consequently we expect a Meissner effect in this phase, and a non-zero critical current. In the fully disordered glass phase there are frozen random sign $\frac{hc}{4e}$ vortices. This phase is then likely to behave similarly to a vortex glass. It will presumably have vanishing linear resistivity but a zero critical current and no Meissner effect. Thus it has the potential\cite{bfk} to explain the experiments within the PDW framework. An immediate consequence is the local breaking of time reversal symmetry at zero field due to the frozen $\pm \frac{hc}{4e}$ vortices. It will be most interesting to look for this through scanning SQUID microscopy or other local probes of magnetism.
Modulated superconductivity in the FFLO states, has of course, been discussed theoretically for decades. In recent years there have been suggestions of experimental sightings of this state in two different systems---first in the heavy fermion superconductor\cite{cecoid5-a,cecoid5-b} $CeCoIn_5$ and very recently in an organic superconductor\cite{Kanoda}. Both of these are very clean systems and hence our results on the effects of weak disorder may be directly applicable. $CeCoIn_5$ is a 3D superconductor and therefore may be in a superconducting Bragg glass phase.
The organic is quasi-two dimensional and thus will at best be in a phase with long range charge-$4e$ superconducting order. In both materials it will be interesting to look for $\frac{hc}{4e}$ flux quantization.
We thank L. Balents, E. Fradkin, T. Giamarchi, D. Huse, and K. Moler for useful discussions and encouragement. DFM acknowledges support by the Caltech Institute for Quantum Information and Matter, an NSF Physics Frontiers Center with support of the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation through Grant GBMF1250; and the Walter Burke Institute for Theoretical Physics at Caltech.
TS was supported by Department of Energy DESC-8739- ER46872, and partially by a Simons Investigator award from the Simons Foundation.
|
\section{\bf Introduction}
Let $(X,\mu)$ be a measure space. For $0<p\leq\infty$, the space
$L^p(X,\mu)$ is the usual Lebesgue space as defined in \cite{gr}
and \cite{r}. Let us remark that for $1\leq p<\infty$
$$\|f\|_p:=\left(\int_X|f(x)|^pd\mu(x)\right)^{1/p}$$ defines a
norm on $L^p(X,\mu)$ such that $(L^p(X,\mu),\|.\|_p)$ is a Banach
space. Also for $0<p<1$,
$$
\|f\|_p:=\int_X|f(x)|^pd\mu(x)
$$
defines a quasi norm on $L^p(X,\mu)$ such that
$(L^p(X,\mu),\|.\|_p)$ is a complete metric space. Moreover for
$p=\infty$,
$$
\|f\|_{\infty}=\inf\{B>0: \mu(\{x\in X: |f(x)|>B\})=0\}
$$
defines a norm on $L^{\infty}(X,\mu)$ such that
$(L^{\infty}(X,\mu),\|.\|_{\infty})$ is a Banach space. In
\cite{aalr1}, we considered an arbitrary intersection of the
$L^p-$spaces denoted by $\bigcap_{p\in J}L^p(G)$, where $G$ is a
locally compact group with a left Haar measure $\lambda$ and
$J\subseteq [1,\infty]$. Then we introduced the subspace $IL_J(G)$
of $\bigcap_{p\in J}L^p(G)$ as
$$
IL_{J}(G)=\{f\in\bigcap_{p\in J} L^p(G): \|f\|_J=\sup_{p\in
J}\Vert f\Vert_{p}<\infty\},
$$
and studied $IL_J(G)$ as a Banach algebra under convolution
product, for the case where $1\in J$. Also in \cite{aalr2}, we
generalized the results of \cite{aalr1} to the weighted case. In
fact for an arbitrary family $\Omega$ of the weight functions on
$G$ and $1\leq p<\infty$, we introduced the subspace
$IL_p(G,\Omega)$ of the locally convex space
$L^p(G,\Omega)=\bigcap_{\omega\in\Omega}L^p(G,\omega)$. Moreover,
we provided some sufficient conditions on $G$ and also $\Omega$ to
construct a norm on $IL_p(G,\Omega)$. The fourth section of
\cite{aalr2} has been assigned to some intersections of Lorentz
spaces. Indeed for the case where $p$ is fixed and $q$ runs
through $J\subseteq (0,\infty)$, we introduced $IL_{p,J}(G)$ as a
subspace of $\cap_{q\in J}L_{p,q}(G)$, where $L_{p,q}(G)$ is the
Lorentz space with indices $p$ and $q$. As the main result, we
proved that $IL_{p,J}(G)=L_{p,m_J}(G)$, in the case where
$m_J=\inf\{q: q\in J\}$ is positive.\\
In the present work, we continue our study concerning the
intersections of Lorentz spaces on the measure space $(X,\mu)$, to
complete our results in this direction. Precisely, we verify most
the results given in the second and third sections of
\cite{aalr1}, for Lorentz spaces.
\section{\bf Preliminaries}
In this section, we give some preliminaries and definitions which
will be used throughout the paper. We refer to \cite{gr}, as a
good
introductory book.\\
Let $(X,\mu)$ be a measure space and $f$ be a complex valued
measurable function on $X$. For each $\alpha>0$, let
$$
d_f(\alpha)=\mu(\{x\in X: |f(x)|>\alpha \}).
$$
The decreasing rearrangement of $f$ is the function
$f^*:[0,\infty)\rightarrow [0,\infty]$ defined by
$$
f^*(t)=\inf\{s>0: d_f(s)\leq t\}.
$$
We adopt the convention $\inf\emptyset=\infty$, thus having
$f^*(t)=\infty$ whenever $d_f(\alpha)>t$ for all $\alpha\geq 0$.
For $0<p\leq\infty$ and $0<q<\infty$, define
\begin{equation}\label{e1}
\|f\|_{L_{p,q}}
=\left(\int_0^{\infty}\left(t^{\frac{1}{p}}f^*(t)\right)^q\frac{dt}{t}\right)^{1/q},
\end{equation}
where $dt$ is the Lebesgue measure. In the case where $q=\infty$,
define
\begin{equation}\label{e3}
\|f\|_{L_{p,\infty}}=\sup_{t>0} t^{\frac{1}{p}}f^*(t).
\end{equation}
The set of all $f$ with $\|f\|_{p,q}<\infty$ is denoted by
$L_{p,q}(X,\mu)$ and is called the Lorentz space with indices $p$
and $q$. As in $L^p-$spaces, two functions in $L_{p,q}(X,\mu)$ are
considered equal if they are equal $\mu-$almost everywhere on $X$.
It is worth noting that by \cite[Proposition 1.4.5]{gr} for each
$0<p<\infty$ we have
\begin{equation}\label{e2}
\int_X|f(x)|^pd\mu(x)=\int_0^{\infty}f^*(t)^pdt.
\end{equation}
It follows that $L_{p,p}(X,\mu)=L^p(X,\mu)$. Furthermore by the
definition given in equation (\ref{e3}), one can observe that
$L_{\infty,\infty}(X,\mu)=L^{\infty}(X,\mu)$. Note that in the
case where $p=\infty$, one can conclude that the only simple
function with finite $\|.\|_{L_{\infty,q}}$ norm is the zero
function. For this reason, $L_{\infty,q}(X,\mu)=\{0\}$, for every
$0<q<\infty$; see \cite[page 49]{gr}.\\
In \cite{aalr2}, for locally compact group $G$ and $0<p<\infty$
and also an arbitrary subset $Q$ of $(0,\infty)$ with
$$m_Q=\inf\{q: q\in Q\}>0,$$ we introduced $IL_{p,Q}(G)$ as a subset
of $\cap_{q\in Q}L_{p,q}(G)$ by
\begin{equation}\label{e4}
IL_{p,Q}(G)=\{f\in \bigcap_{q\in Q}L_{p,q}(G):
\|f\|_{L_{p,Q}}=\sup_{q\in Q}\|f\|_{L_{p,q}}<\infty\}.
\end{equation}
As the main result of the third section in \cite{aalr2}, we proved
the following theorem.
\begin{thm}\cite[Theorem 12]{aalr2}
Let $G$ be a locally compact group, $0<p<\infty$ and $Q$ be an
arbitrary subset of $(0,\infty)$ such that $m_Q>0$. Then
$IL_{p,Q}(G)=L_{p,m_Q}(G)$. Moreover, for each $f\in
L_{p,m_Q}(G)$,
\begin{equation}\label{e8}
\|f\|_{L_{p,m_Q}}\leq\|f\|_{L_{p,Q}}\leq\max\left\{1,
\left(\frac{m_Q}{p}\right)^{1/{m_Q}}\right\}\|f\|_{L_{p,m_Q}}.
\end{equation}
\end{thm}
Note that in the definition of $IL_{p,Q}(G)$ given in (\ref{e4}),
one can replace $G$ by an arbitrary measure space $(X,\mu)$.
Precisely if let
\begin{equation}\label{e7}
IL_{p,Q}(X,\mu)=\{f\in \bigcap_{q\in Q}L_{p,q}(X,\mu):
\|f\|_{L_{p,Q}}=\sup_{q\in Q}\|f\|_{L_{p,q}}<\infty\},
\end{equation}
then $IL_{p,Q}(X,\mu)=L_{p,m_Q}(X,\mu)$. Moreover for each $f\in
L_{p,m_Q}(X,\mu)$, \eqref{e8} is satisfied. Furthermore, Theorem
\cite[Theorem 12]{aalr2} is also valid for $IL_{p,Q}(X,\mu)$. In
the present work, in a similar way, we introduce and characterize
the spaces $IL_{J,q}(X,\mu)$ and also $IL_{J,Q}(X,\mu)$, as other
intersections of Lorentz spaces. Moreover we obtain some results
about Lorentz space related to a Banach spaces $E$, introduced in
\cite{kat}.
\section{\bf Main Results}
At the beginning of the present section we recall \cite[Exercise
1.4.2]{gr}, which will be used several times in our further
arguments. A simple proof is given here.
\begin{pro}\label{p1}
Let $(X,\mu)$ be a measure space and $0<p_1<p_2 \leq \infty$. Then
$$
L_{p_1,\infty}(X,\mu)\bigcap
L_{p_2,\infty}(X,\mu)\subseteq\bigcap_{p_1<p<p_2 ,
0<s\leq\infty}L_{p,s}(X,\mu).
$$
\end{pro}
\begin{proof}
Let $f\in L_{p_1,\infty}(X,\mu)\cap L_{p_2,\infty}(X,\mu)$. If
$\|f\|_{L_{p_1,\infty}}=0$, one can readily obtained that $f\in
L_{p,s}(X,\mu)$, for all $p_1<p<p_2$ and $0<s\leq\infty$. Now let
$\|f\|_{L_{p_1,\infty}}\neq 0$ and first suppose that
$p_2<\infty$. We show that $f\in L_{p,s}(X,\mu)$, for all
$p_1<p<p_2$ and $0<s<\infty$. It is clear that for each $\alpha>0$
\begin{equation}\label{e6}
d_f(\alpha)\leq \min
\left(\frac{\|f\|_{L_{p_1,\infty}}^{p_1}}{\alpha^{p_1}} ,
\frac{\|f\|_{L_{p_2,\infty}}^{p_2}}{\alpha^{p_2}}\right).
\end{equation}
Set
$$
B=\left(
\frac{\|f\|_{L_{p_2,\infty}}^{p_2}}{\|f\|_{L_{p_1,\infty}}^{p_1}}\right)^{\frac{1}{p_2-p_1}}.
$$
Thus
\begin{eqnarray*}
\|f\|_{L_{p,s}}&=&\left(p\int_0^{\infty}(d_{f}(\alpha)^{\frac{1}{p}}\;\alpha)^s
\frac{d\alpha}{\alpha}\right)^{\frac{1}{s}}=
\left(p\int_0^\infty d_f(\alpha)^{\frac{s}{p}}\;\alpha^{s-1}d\alpha\right)^{\frac{1}{s}}\\
&\leq& \left(p\int_0^B
\alpha^{s-1}\;\left(\frac{\|f\|_{L_{p_1,\infty}}^{p_1}}{\alpha^{p_1}}\right)^
{\frac{s}{p}}d\alpha\right)^{\frac{1}{s}}+ \left(p\int_B^{\infty}
\alpha^{s-1}\;\left(\frac{\|f\|_{L_{p_2,\infty}}
^{p_2}}{\alpha^{p_2}}\right)^{\frac{s}{p}}d\alpha\right)^{\frac{1}{s}}\\
&=& p^{\frac{1}{s}}\;
\|f\|_{L_{p_1,\infty}}^{\frac{p_1}{p}}\;\left(\int_0^B
\alpha^{s-1-\frac{sp_1}{p}}d\alpha\right)^{\frac{1}{s}}+
p^{\frac{1}{s}}\;\|f\|_{L_{p_2,\infty}}^{\frac{p_2}{p}}\;
\left(\int_B^{\infty} \alpha^{s-1-\frac{sp_2}{p}}d\alpha\right)^{\frac{1}{s}}\\
&=& p^{\frac{1}{s}}\;\|f\|_{L_{p_1,\infty}}^{\frac{p_1}{p}}\left
(\frac{B^{s-\frac{sp_1}{p}}}{s-\frac{sp_1}{p}}\right)^{\frac{1}{s}}
+ p^{\frac{1}{s}}\;\|f\|_{L_{p_2,\infty}}^{\frac{p_2}{p}}\left
(\frac{B^{s-\frac{sp_2}{p}}}{\frac{sp_2}{p}-s}\right)^{\frac{1}{s}}\\
&=& \left(\frac{p}{(s-\frac{sp_1}{p})}\right)^{\frac{1}{s}}\;
\|f\|_{L_{p_1,\infty}}^{\frac{p_1}{p}.(\frac{p_2-p}{p_2-p_1})}\;
\|f\|_{L_{p_2,\infty}}^{\frac{p_2}{p}\;(\frac{p-p_1}{p_2-p_1})}\\
&&+\left(\frac{p}{(\frac{sp_2}{p}-s)}\right)^{\frac{1}{s}}\;
\|f\|_{L_{p_1,\infty}}^{\frac{p_1}{p}.(\frac{p_2-p}{p_2-p_1})}\;
\|f\|_{L_{p_2,\infty}}^{\frac{p_2}{p}\;(\frac{p-p_1}{p_2-p_1})} \\
&=& \left(\left(\frac{p}{(s-\frac{sp_1}{p})}\right)^{\frac{1}{s}}+
\left(\frac{p}{(\frac{sp_2}{p}-s)}\right)^{\frac{1}{s}}\right)
\;\|f\|_{L_{p_1,\infty}}^{\frac{p_1}{p}(\frac{p_2-p}{p_2-p_1})}\;
\|f\|_{L_{p_2,\infty}}^{\frac{p_2}{p}(\frac{p-p_1}{p_2-p_1})}\\
&<&\infty.
\end{eqnarray*}
Thus $f\in L_{p,s}(X,\mu)$. For $p_2=\infty$, since
$d_f(\alpha)=0$ for each $\alpha
>\|f\|_{\infty}$, inequality (\ref{e6}) implies that
$$\|f\|_{L_{p,s}}^s \leq \frac{p}{s-\frac{sp_1}{p}}
\|f\|_{p_1,\infty}^{\frac{sp_1}{p}}\|f\|_{\infty}^{s-\frac{sp_1}{p}},$$
which implies $f\in L_{p,s}(X,\mu)$. In the case where $s=\infty$,
by \cite[Proposition 1.1.14]{gr}, for $p_1 < r <p_2$ we have
$$L_{p_1,\infty}(X,\mu)\cap L_{p_2,\infty}(X,\mu)\subseteq L^r(X,\mu)\subseteq L_{r,\infty}(X,\mu).$$
This gives the proposition.
\end{proof}
\begin{pro}\label{p5}
Let $(X,\mu)$ be a measure space, $0<q\leq\infty$ and
$0<p_1<p_2\leq \infty$. Then
$$
\bigcap_{p_1\leq r\leq p_2} L_{r,q}(X,\mu)=L_{p_1,q}(X,\mu)\cap
L_{p_2,q}(X,\mu).
$$
Moreover for each $f\in L_{p_1,q}(X,\mu)\cap L_{p_2,q}(X,\mu)$ and
$p_1<r<p_2$,
$$
\|f\|_{L_{r,q}}\leq 2^{1/q}\max\{\|f\|_{L_{p_1,q}},
\|f\|_{L_{p_2,q}}\}.
$$
\end{pro}
\begin{proof}
By \cite[Proposition 1.4.10]{gr} and Proposition \ref{p1} we have
\begin{eqnarray*}
L_{p_1,q}(X,\mu)\cap
L_{p_2,q}(X,\mu)&\subseteq&L_{p_1,\infty}(X,\mu)\cap
L_{p_2,\infty}(X,\mu)\\
&\subseteq&\bigcap_{p_1<r<p_2 , 0<s\leq\infty} L_{r,s}(X,\mu).
\end{eqnarray*}
It follows that $$L_{p_1,q}(X,\mu)\cap L_{p_2,q}(X,\mu)\subseteq
\bigcap_{p_1\leq r\leq p_2} L_{r,q}(X,\mu).$$ The converse of the
inclusion is clearly valid. Thus
$$L_{p_1,q}(X,\mu)\cap L_{p_2,q}(X,\mu)=\bigcap_{p_1\leq
r\leq p_2} L_{r,q}(X,\mu).
$$
Now let $q<\infty$. For each $f\in L_{p_1,q}(X,\mu)\cap
L_{p_2,q}(X,\mu)$, we have
\begin{eqnarray*}
\|f\|_{L_{r,q}}^q &=& \int_0^{\infty}\left(t^{\frac{1}{r}}f^*(t)\right)^q\frac{dt}{t}\\
&\leq&\int_0^1\left(t^{\frac{1}{p_2}}f^*(t)\right)^q\frac{dt}{t}+\int_1^{\infty}
\left(t^{\frac{1}{p_1}}f^*(t)\right)^q\frac{dt}{t}\\
&\leq&\|f\|_{L_{p_2,q}}^q+ \|f\|_{L_{p_1,q}}^q\\
&\leq& 2\;\max\{\|f\|_{L_{p_2,q}}^q,\|f\|_{L_{p_1,q}}^q\}
\end{eqnarray*}
Also for $q=\infty$ we have
\begin{eqnarray*}
\|f\|_{L_{r,\infty}} &=& \sup_{t>0} t^{\frac{1}{r}}f^*(t) \\
&\leq& \max \{\sup_{0<t<1} t^{\frac{1}{p_2}}f^*(t), \sup_{t\geq 1}t^{\frac{1}{p_1}}f^*(t)\} \\
&\leq& \max \{\|f\|_{L_{p_2,\infty}} , \|f\|_{L_{p_1,\infty}}\}.
\end{eqnarray*}
This completes the proof.
\end{proof}
We are in a position to prove \cite[Proposition 2.3]{aalr1} for
Lorentz spaces. It is obtained in the following proposition.
Recall from \cite{aalr1} that for a subset $J$ of $(0,\infty)$,
$$M_J=\sup\{p: p\in J\}.$$
\begin{pro}\label{p6}
Let $(X,\mu)$ be a measure space, $0<q\leq \infty$ and $J$ be a
subset of $(0,\infty)$ such that $0<m_J$. Then the following
assertions hold.
\begin{enumerate}
\item[(i)] If $m_J, M_J\in J$, then
$$\bigcap_{p\in[m_J,M_J]}L_{p,q}(X,\mu)=\bigcap_{p\in
J}L_{p,q}(X,\mu)=L_{m_J,q}(X,\mu)\cap L_{M_J,q}(X,\mu).$$
\item[(ii)] If $m_J\in J$ and $M_J\notin J$, then $\bigcap_{p\in
J}L_{p,q}(X,\mu)=\bigcap_{p\in [m_J,M_J)}L_{p,q}(X,\mu)$.
\item[(iii)] If $m_J\notin J$ and $M_J\in J$, then $\bigcap_{p\in
J}L_{p,q}(X,\mu)=\bigcap_{p\in (m_J,M_J]}L_{p,q}(X,\mu)$.
\item[(iv)] If $m_J,M_J\notin J$, then $\bigcap_{p\in
J}L_{p,q}(X,\mu)=\bigcap_{p\in (m_J,M_J)}L_{p,q}(X,\mu)$.
\end{enumerate}
\end{pro}
\begin{proof}
$(i)$. It is clearly obtain by Proposition \ref{p5}.
$(ii)$. Let $f\in \bigcap_{p\in J}L_{p,q}(X,\mu)$ and take $m_J <
t<M_J$. Then there exist $t_1,t_2\in J$ such that $t_1<t<t_2$. So
by Proposition \ref{p5}
$$
f\in L_{t_1,q}(X,\mu)\cap L_{t_2,q}(X,\mu)=\bigcap_{t_1\leq p\leq
t_2} L_{p,q}(X,\mu)
$$
and thus $f\in L_{t,q}(X,\mu)$. It follows that
$$
\bigcap_{p\in J}L_{p,q}(X,\mu)\subseteq L_{t,q}(X,\mu),
$$
for each $t\in [m_J,M_J)$. Consequently
$$
\bigcap_{p\in J}L_{p,q}(X,\mu)\subseteq\bigcap_{p\in
[m_J,M_J)}L_{p,q}(X,\mu).
$$
The converse of the inclusion is clear.
$(iii)$ and $(iv)$ are proved in a similar way.
\end{proof}
\noindent Similar to the definition of $IL_{p,Q}(X,\mu)$ given in
(\ref{e7}), for $J, Q\subseteq (0,\infty)$ let
\begin{center}
$IL_{J,q}(X,\mu)=\{f\in\bigcap_{p\in J} L_{p,q}(X,\mu):\;\;
\|f\|_{L_{J,q}}=\sup_{p\in J} \|f\|_{L_{p,q}}<\infty\}$
\end{center}
and
\begin{center}
$IL_{J,Q}(X,\mu)=\{f\in\bigcap_{p\in J,q\in Q} L_{p,q}(X,\mu):\;\;
\|f\|_{L_{J,Q}}=\sup_{p\in J,q\in Q} \|f\|_{L_{p,q}}<\infty\}$.
\end{center}
\begin{pro}\label{p7}
Let $(X,\mu)$ be a measure space, $0<q\leq\infty$ and $J\subseteq
(0,\infty)$ such that $m_J>0$. Then
$$IL_{J,q}(X,\mu)\subseteq
L_{m_J,q}(X,\mu)\cap L_{M_J,q}(X,\mu).$$
\end{pro}
\begin{proof}
First, let $q<\infty$. We follow a proof similar to the proof of
\cite[Theorem 12]{aalr2}. Suppose that $M_J<\infty$ and $(x_n)$ is
a sequences in $J$ such that $\lim_n x_n=M_J$. For $f\in
IL_{J,q}(X,\mu)$ by Fatou's lemma, we have
\begin{eqnarray*}
\|f\|_{L_{M_J,q}}^q &=&\int_0^{\infty}
\left(t^{\frac{1}{M_J}}.f^*(t)\right)^q\frac{dt}{t}\\
&=&\int_0^{\infty} \liminf_n\left(t^{\frac{1}{x_n}}.f^*(t)\right)^q \frac{dt}{t}\\
&\leq& \liminf_n \int_0^{\infty}\left(t^{\frac{1}{x_n}}.f^*(t)\right)^q \frac{dt}{t}\\
&=&\liminf_n \|f\|_{L_{x_n,q}}^q\\
&\leq&\|f\|_{J,q}^q\\
&<&\infty.
\end{eqnarray*}
If $M_J=\infty$ and $f\in IL_{J,q}(X,\mu)$, then
\begin{eqnarray*}
\left(\int_0^{\infty}f^*(t)^q\frac{dt}{t}\right)^{1/q}&=&\left(\int_0^{\infty}
\liminf_n
\left(t^{\frac{1}{x_n}}f^*(t)\right)^q\frac{dt}{t}\right)^{1/q}\\
&\leq&\liminf_n \|f\|_{L^{x_n,q}}\leq \|f\|_{J,q}<\infty.
\end{eqnarray*}
On the other hand, as we mentioned in section 1, since $q<\infty$
then $L_{\infty,q}(X,\mu)=\{0\}$ and since
$\int_0^{\infty}f^*(t)^q\frac{dt}{t}<\infty$, so we have $f=0$,
$\mu-$almost every where on $X$. Thus
$IL_{J,q}(X,\mu)=L_{\infty,q}(X,\mu)=\{0\}$. It follows that
$IL_{J,q}(X,\mu)\subseteq L_{M_J,q}(X,\mu)$.
Now suppose that $q=\infty$ and $f\in IL_{J,q}(X,\mu)$. Then
\begin{eqnarray*}
\|f\|_{L_{M_J,\infty}}&=&\sup_{t>0}t^{\frac{1}{M_J}}\;f^*(t)=\sup_{t>0}\left(\lim_n t^{\frac{1}{x_n}}.f^*(t)\right)\\
&\leq& \sup_{t>0}\left(\lim_n \|f\|_{L_{x_n,\infty}}\right)
=\|f\|_{L_{J,\infty}}< \infty,
\end{eqnarray*}
and so $f\in L_{M_J,\infty}(X,\mu)$. Thus we proved that
$IL_{J,q}(X,\mu)\subseteq L_{M_J,q}(X,\mu)$, for each
$0<q\leq\infty$. Using some similar arguments, one can obtain that
$IL_{J,q}(X,\mu)\subseteq L_{m_J,q}(X,\mu)$. Consequently the
proof is complete.
\end{proof}
The following proposition is obtained immediately from
Propositions \ref{p5}, \ref{p6} and \ref{p7}.
\begin{pro}\label{p8}
Let $(X,\mu)$ be a measure space, $0<q\leq \infty$ and $J\subseteq
(0,\infty)$ such that $m_J>0$ and $M_J<\infty$. Then
\begin{eqnarray*}
IL_{J,q}(X,\mu)&=& IL_{(m_J,M_J),q}(X,\mu)=IL_{[m_J,M_J),q}(X,\mu)\\
&=& IL_{(m_J,M_J],q}(X,\mu)=IL_{[m_J,M_J],q}(X,\mu)\\
&=&L_{m_J,q}(X,\mu)\cap L_{M_J,q}(X,\mu).
\end{eqnarray*}
Furthermore, for each $f\in IL_{J,q}(X,\mu)$ and $p\in J$,
$$
\|f\|_{L_{p,q}}\leq 2^{1/q}
\max\{\|f\|_{L_{m_J,q}},\|f\|_{L_{M_J,q}}\}
$$
\end{pro}
\begin{thm}\label{p9}
Let $(X,\mu)$ be a measure space and $J,Q\subseteq (0,\infty)$
such that $m_J,m_Q>0$. Then
\begin{equation}\label{e9}
IL_{J,Q}(X,\mu)=L_{m_J,m_Q}(X,\mu)\cap L_{M_J,m_Q}(X,\mu).
\end{equation}
Moreover for each $f\in IL_{J,Q}(X,\mu)$
\begin{eqnarray*}
\max\{\|f\|_{L_{m_J,m_Q}}, \|f\|_{L_{M_J,m_Q}}\}&\leq&\sup_{p\in
J,q\in Q} \|f\|_{L_{p,q}}\\
&\leq& K\max \{\|f\|_{L_{m_J,m_Q}}, \|f\|_{L_{M_J,m_Q}}\},
\end{eqnarray*}
for some positive constant $K>0$.
\end{thm}
\begin{proof}
Let $f\in IL_{J,Q}(X,\mu)$. Then by proposition \ref{p8}, we have
$$f\in L_{m_J,q}(X,\mu)\cap L_{M_J,q}(X,\mu),$$
for each $q\in Q$, and so
$$
f\in\left(\cap_{q\in Q} L_{m_J,q}(X,\mu)\right)\cap
\left(\cap_{q\in Q}L_{M_J,q}(X,\mu)\right).
$$
Thus \cite[Theorem 12]{aalr2} implies that $f\in
L_{m_J,m_Q}(X,\mu)\cap L_{M_J,m_Q}(X,\mu)$. Also by Fatou's lemma,
one can readily obtain that
$$
\|f\|_{L_{m_J,m_Q}}\leq\sup_{p\in J,q\in Q} \|f\|_{L_{p,q}}<\infty
$$
and also
$$
\|f\|_{L_{M_J,m_Q}}\leq\sup_{p\in J,q\in Q}
\|f\|_{L_{p,q}}<\infty.
$$
For the converse, note that by Proposition \ref{p5} and
\cite[Proposition 1.4.10]{gr}, we have
\begin{eqnarray*}
L_{m_J,m_Q}(X,\mu)\cap L_{M_J,m_Q}(X,\mu)&=&\bigcap_{m_J\leq r\leq
M_J} L_{r,m_Q}(X,\mu)\\
&\subseteq&\bigcap_{m_J\leq r\leq M_J, m_Q\leq t\leq
M_Q}L_{r,t}(X,\mu).
\end{eqnarray*}
It follows that $$L_{m_J,m_Q}(X,\mu)\cap
L_{M_J,m_Q}(X,\mu)\subseteq\bigcap_{p\in J,q\in Q}
L_{p,q}(X,\mu).$$ By Proposition \ref{p8} and \cite[Theorem
12]{aalr2}, for each $f\in L_{m_J,m_Q}(X,\mu)\cap
L_{M_J,m_Q}(X,\mu)$ we have
\begin{eqnarray*}
\max\{\|f\|_{L_{m_J,m_Q}} , \|f\|_{L_{M_J,m_Q}}\}
&\leq&\sup_{m_J\leq p\leq M_J,m_Q\leq q\leq M_Q}\|f\|_{L_{p,q}}\\
&\leq&\sup_{m_J\leq p\leq M_J}\left[\max\{1,(\frac{m_Q}{p})^{\frac{1}{m_Q}}\}\;\|f\|_{L_{p,m_Q}}\right]\\
&\leq&2^{1/{m_Q}} \max\{1,(\frac{m_Q}{m_J})^{\frac{1}{m_Q}}\}\;
\max\{\|f\|_{L_{m_J,m_Q}},\|f\|_{L_{M_J,m_Q}}\}
\end{eqnarray*}
and so the inequality is provided by choosing
$$K=2^{1/{m_Q}}\max\{1,(\frac{m_Q}{m_J})^{\frac{1}{m_Q}}\}.$$
Moreover $f\in IL_{J,Q}(X,\mu)$ and the equality \eqref{e9} is
satisfied.
\end{proof}
\begin{pro}\label{p12}
Let $(X,\mu)$ be a measure space and $0<p\leq\infty$. Then $fg\in
L_{p,\infty}(X,\mu)$, for each $f\in L^{\infty}(X,\mu)$ and $g\in
L_{p,\infty}(X,\mu)$.
\end{pro}
\begin{proof}
By \cite[Proposition 1.4.5]{gr} parts $(7)$ and $(15)$, we have
\begin{eqnarray*}
\|f\;g\|_{p,\infty}&=&\sup_{t>0}\left(t^{\frac{1}{p}}\;(f\;g)^*(t)\right)
\leq\sup_{t>0}\left(t^{\frac{1}{p}} f^*(\frac{t}{2})\;g^*(\frac{t}{2})\right) \\
&=& \sup_{t>0}\left((2t)^{\frac{1}{p}}\;f^*(t)\;g^*(t)\right)
\leq 2^{\frac{1}{p}}\;\|g\|_{p,\infty}\;\|f\|_{\infty}\\
&<&\infty.
\end{eqnarray*}
It follows that $fg\in L_{p,\infty}(X,\mu)$.
\end{proof}
\begin{pro}\label{p13}
Let $(X,\mu)$ be a measure space, $0<p\leq \infty$ and
$J,Q\subseteq (0,\infty)$ such that $m_J>0$, $m_Q>0$ and $m_Q\in
Q$. Then $IL_{J,Q}(X,\mu)=A\cap B$, where
$$
A=\{f\in\bigcap_{p\in J,q\in Q} L_{p,q}(X,\mu),\; M_q= \sup_{p\in
J} \|f\|_{L_{p,q}}<\infty,~ \forall q\in Q\}
$$
and
$$
B=\{f\in \bigcap_{p\in J,q\in Q} L_{p,q}(X,\mu),\; M_p= \sup_{q\in
Q} \|f\|_{L_{p,q}}<\infty,~ \forall p\in J\}.
$$
\end{pro}
\begin{proof}
It is clear that $IL_{J,Q}(X,\mu)\subseteq A\cap B$. For the
converse assume that $f\in A\cap B$. By \cite[Theorem 12]{aalr2}
implies that for each $p\in J$
$$
\sup_{q\in Q} \|f\|_{L_{p,q}} \leq \max\{1,
(\frac{m_Q}{p})^{\frac{1}{m_Q}}\} \|f\|_{L_{p,m_Q}}
$$
and so
\begin{eqnarray*}
\sup_{p\in J,~q\in Q} \|f\|_{L_{p,q}} &\leq&\max\{1,(\frac{m_Q}{m_J})^{\frac{1}{m_Q}}\}\sup_{p\in J}\|f\|_{L_{p,m_Q}}\\
&=&\max\{1,(\frac{m_Q}{m_J})^{\frac{1}{m_Q}}\}\;M_{m_Q}\\
&<&\infty.
\end{eqnarray*}
It follows that $f\in IL_{J,Q}(X,\mu)$.
\end{proof}
In the sequel, we investigate some previous results, for the
special Lorentz space $\ell_{p,q}\{E\}$, introduced in \cite{kat}.
In the further discussions, $E$ stands for a Banach space. Also
$K$ is the real or complex field and $I$ is the set of positive
integers. We first provide the required preliminaries, which
follow from \cite{kat}.
\begin{DEF}\em
For $1\leq p \leq \infty$, $1\leq q<\infty$ or $1\leq p<\infty$,
$q=\infty$ let $\ell_{p,q}\{E\}$ be the space of all $E$-valued
zero sequences $\{x_i\}$ such that
\begin{eqnarray*}
\|\{x_i\}\|_{p,q}= \left\lbrace
\begin{array}{c l}
\left(\sum_{i=1}^{\infty} i^{q/p -1} {\|x_{\phi(i)}\|}\;^q
\right)^{\frac{1}{q}} & \hbox{for $1\leq p\leq\infty, ~1\leq
q<\infty$}\\
\sup_i i^{\frac{1}{p}}\|x_{\phi(i)}\| & \hbox{for $1\leq
p<\infty,~ q=\infty$}.
\end{array}\right.
\end{eqnarray*}
is finite, where $\{\|x_{\phi(i)}\|\}$ is the non-increasing
rearrangement of $\{\|x_i\|\}$. If $E=K$, then $\ell_{p,q}\{K\}$
is denoted by $\ell_{p,q}$.
\end{DEF}
In particular, $\ell_{p,p}\{E\}$ coincides with $\ell_p\{E\}$ and
$\|.\|_{p,p}= \|.\|_p$; see \cite{mi}.\\
The following result will be used in the final result of this
paper. It is in fact \cite[Proposition 2]{kat}.
\begin{pro}\label{p22}
Let $E$ be a Banach space.
\begin{enumerate}
\item[(i)] If $1 \leq p < \infty , 1 \leq q<q_1 \leq \infty$, then
$\ell_{p,q}\{E\} \subseteq \ell_{p,q_1}\{E\}$ and for every
$\{x_i\} \in \ell_{p,q}\{E\}$
$$\|\{x_i\}\|_{p,q_1} \leq \left(\frac{q}{p}\right)^{\frac{1}{q}-\frac{1}{q_1}}
\|\{x_i\}\|_{p,q},$$ for $p<q$ and $$\|\{x_i\}\|_{p,q_1} \leq
\|\{x_i\}\|_{p,q},$$ for $p \geq q$. In fact
$$\|\{x_i\}\|_{p,q_1} \leq \max \{1,
\frac{q}{p}\}\|\{x_i\}\|_{p,q}.$$ \item[(ii)] Let eather $1\leq p
<p_1\leq\infty$, $1\leq q<\infty $ or $1 \leq p<p_1<\infty$,
$q=\infty$. Then
$$\ell_{p,q}\{E\} \subseteq\ell_{p_1,q}\{E\} $$
and for every $\{x_i\} \in \ell_{p,q}\{E\}$
$$\|\{x_i\} \|_{p_1,q}\leq\|\{x_i\}\|_{p,q}$$
\end{enumerate}
\end{pro}
Now for $J,Q\subseteq [1,\infty)$ let
\begin{center}
$IL_{J,Q}=\{\{x_i\}\in\bigcap_{p\in J,q\in Q}\ell_{p,q}:\;\;
\|\{x_i\}\|_{J,Q}=\sup_{p\in J,q\in Q}
\|\{x_i\}\|_{{p,q}}<\infty\}$.
\end{center}
We finish this work with the following result, which determines
the structure of $IL_{J,Q}$.
\begin{pro}\label{p15}
Let $J,Q\subseteq [1,\infty)$. Then $IL_{J,Q}=\ell_{m_J,m_Q}$.
\end{pro}
\begin{proof}
Some similar arguments to \cite[Theorem 12]{aalr2} implies that
$IL_{p,Q}=\ell_{p,m_Q}$. Indeed, by Proposition \ref{p22} for each
$q\in Q$, $\ell_{p,m_Q} \subseteq \ell_{p,q}$. Also for each
$\{x_i\}\in \ell_{p,m_Q}$,
$$\|\{x_i\}\|_{p,q} \leq \max\{ 1, \frac{m_Q}{p}\} \|\{x_i\}\|_{p,m_Q}.$$
It follows that $\{x_i\}\in IL_{p,Q}$ and
$$\|\{x_i\}\|_{p,Q} \leq \max \{1,\frac{m_Q}{p}\}\|\{x_i\}\|_{p,m_Q}.$$
Thus $\ell_{p,m_Q}\subseteq IL_{p,Q}$. The reverse of this
inclusion is clear whenever $m_Q\in Q$. Now let $m_Q\notin Q$.
Thus there is a sequence $(y_n)_{n\in\Bbb N}$ in $Q$, converging
to $m_Q$. For each $\{x_i\}\in IL_{p,Q}$, Fatou's lemma implies
that
\begin{eqnarray*}
\|\{x_i\}\|_{p,m_Q}^{m_Q} &=& \sum_{i=1}^{\infty} i^{\frac{m_Q}{p}-1} \|x_{\Phi(i)}\|^{m_Q}\\
&=& \sum_{i=1}^{\infty} \lim\inf_n \left( i^{\frac{y_n}{p}-1} \|x_{\Phi(i)}\|^{y_n} \right)\\
& \leq &\lim\inf_n \sum_{i=1}^{\infty} \left(i^{\frac{y_n}{p}-1} \|x_{\Phi(i)}\|^{y_n} \right)\\
&=& \lim\inf_n \|\{x_i\}\|_{p,y_n}^{y_n} \leq \lim\inf_n \|\{x_i\}\|_{p,Q}^{y_n}\\
&=& \|\{x_i\}\|_{p,Q}^{m_Q},
\end{eqnarray*}
which implies $\{x_i\}\in\ell_{p,m_Q}$. Consequently
$IL_{p,Q}=\ell_{p,m_Q}$. In the sequel, we show that
$IL_{J,q}\subseteq\ell_{m_J,q}$, for each $q\in Q$. Suppose that
$(y_n)$ be a sequences in $J$ such that $\lim_n x_n=m_J$ and
$\{x_i\}\in IL_{J,q}$ Then by Fatou's lemma, we have
\begin{eqnarray*}
\|\{x_i\}\|_{m_J,q}^q &=& \sum_{i=1}^{\infty} \left(i^{\frac{q}{m_J}-1} \|x_{\Phi(i)}\|^q\right)\\
&=&\sum_{i=1}^{\infty}\lim\inf_n \left(i^{\frac{q}{y_n}-1} \|x_{\Phi(i)}\|^q\right)\\
&\leq& \lim\inf_n \sum_{i=1}^{\infty}\left(i^{\frac{q}{y_n}-1}
\|x_{\Phi(i)}\|^q\right)\\
&=&\lim\inf_n \|\{x_i\}\|_{y_n,q}^q\\
&\leq&\|\{x_i\}\|_{J,q}^q\\
&<&\infty.
\end{eqnarray*}
Hence $IL_{J,q}\subseteq\ell_{m_J,q}$. Now suppose that $\{x_i\}
\in IL_{J,Q}$. Then for each $q\in Q$, $ \{x_i\}\in IL_{J,q}$ and
so $\{x_i\}\in\ell_{m_J,q}$. On the other hand by the above
inequalities, for each $1\leq q<\infty$, we have
$\|\{x_i\}\|_{m_J,q} \leq \|\{x_i\}\|_{J,q}$. So $\{x_i\}\in
IL_{m_J,Q} \subseteq \ell_{m_J,m_Q}$, which implies $IL_{J,Q}
\subseteq \ell_{m_J,m_Q}$. Also by Proposition \ref{p22}, for each
$p\geq m_J$ and $q\geq m_Q$ we have $\ell_{m_J,m_Q} \subseteq
\ell_{m_J,q} \subseteq\ell_{p,q}$. Consequently
$$\ell_{m_J,m_Q} \subseteq \bigcap_{p\in J , q\in Q} \ell_{p,q}.$$
Moreover for each $\{x_i\}\in \ell_{p,q}$,
$$
\sup_{p\in J, q\in Q} \|\{x_i\}\|_{p,q} \leq \sup_{q\in Q}
\|\{x_i\}\|_{m_J,q} \leq \max \{ 1, \frac{m_Q}{m_J}\}
\|\{x_i\}\|_{m_J,m_Q}.
$$
It follows that $$\ell_{m_J,m_Q}\subseteq IL_{J,Q} \subseteq
\ell_{m_J,m_Q}.
$$
Therefore $IL_{J,Q}=\ell_{m_J,m_Q}$, as claimed.
\end{proof}
{\bf Acknowledgment.} This research was partially supported by the
Banach algebra Center of Excellence for Mathematics, University of
Isfahan.
\footnotesize
|
\section{Apparent opening angles}
Recently we found that nearly all of the 60 heavily observed jets display significant changes of the innermost
jet position angle with time \cite{MOJAVEX} suggesting that the superluminal AGN jet features seen in a
single-epoch images occupy only a portion of the entire jet cross section. Thus,
to better reconstruct the jet cross section of
each source observed
within the MOJAVE/2cm VLBA Survey we produced a corresponding stacked image using all available epochs for
a given source at 15~GHz, comprising a sample of 363 AGN jets having at least 5 epochs and a clear VLBI core
position. The opening angle of the jet was calculated as the median value of
$\alpha_\mathrm{app}=2\arctan[0.5(D^2-b_\varphi^2)^{1/2}/r]$, where $D$ is the FWHM of a Gaussian fitted to
the transverse jet brightness profile, $r$ is the distance to the VLBI core along the jet ridge line,
$b_\varphi$ is the beam size along the position angle $\varphi$ of the jet-cut.
In Fig.~\ref{fig1} we show the 15~GHz stacked image of BL Lac as an example together with opening angle of
the jet as a function of angular distance to the core along the ridge line.
\begin{figure}
\centering
\includegraphics[height=.42\textwidth,angle=-90]{fig1a.eps}\hspace{0.5cm}
\includegraphics[height=.51\textwidth,angle=-90]{fig1b.eps}
\caption{{\it Left:} MOJAVE image of BL Lac at 15~GHz after stacking 125 epochs covering a time range of
about 20 years. The total intensity ridge line is shown by red. Time evolution of the ridge line in BL Lac
is discussed in \cite{Cohen_BLLAC2}. {\it Right:} Apparent opening angle of the jet along its ridge line.}
\label{fig1}
\end{figure}
The distribution of the derived $\alpha_\mathrm{app}$ values is shown in Fig.~\ref{fig2} (top). LAT-detected
\cite{FGL2}
sources (Fig.~\ref{fig2}, bottom) have statistically wider apparent jet opening angles compared to those of
non-LAT-detected (Fig.~\ref{fig2}, middle) on a very high level of significance supporting our early findings.
\begin{figure}
\centering
\includegraphics[height=.63\textwidth,angle=-90,clip=true]{fig2.eps}
\caption{Distributions of the apparent opening angle from jet-cut analysis for 363 MOJAVE AGN
({\it top panel}), comprising 114 non-LAT-detected ({\it middle panel}) and 249 LAT-detected
({\it bottom panel}) sources after 24 months of scientific operation.}
\label{fig2}
\end{figure}
\section{Intrinsic opening angles and viewing angles}
We have derived the values of the viewing angle $\theta$ and the bulk Lorentz factor $\Gamma$ using
jet speeds from the MOJAVE kinematic analysis \cite{MOJAVEX} and variability Doppler factor
from the Mets\"ahovi AGN monitoring program \cite{Hovatta09}. The overlap of the MOJAVE and
Mets\"ahovi programs comprises 56 sources. The intrinsic opening angles calculated for the 56 sources
using a relation $\tan(\alpha_\mathrm{int}/2)=\tan(\alpha_\mathrm{app}/2)\sin\theta$ have a median of
$1\hbox{$.\!\!^\circ$}3$ and show inverse dependence on Lorentz factor (Fig.~\ref{fig3}, left), as predicted by
hydrodynamical \cite{BK79} and magnetic acceleration models \cite{Komissarov07} of relativistic jets.
\begin{figure}
\centering
\includegraphics[height=.47\textwidth,angle=-90]{fig3a.eps}\hspace{0.3cm}
\includegraphics[height=.47\textwidth,angle=-90]{fig3b.eps}
\caption{{\it Left:} Intrinsic opening angle vs. Lorentz factor for 56 jets. The solid line shows the median
curve fit with the assumed relation $\alpha_\mathrm{int}=\rho/\Gamma$, where $\rho$ is a constant (here
$\rho=0.33$ rad). {\it Right:} Probability density function of viewing angle as derived from the apparent
angle and Lorentz factor distributions of $\gamma$-ray bright (blue curve) and $\gamma$-ray weak (red curve) AGN.}
\label{fig3}
\end{figure}
A K-S test indicates no significant difference ($p=0.43$) between the samples of LAT-detected and
non-LAT-detected sources, suggesting that the established statistical difference in apparent opening
angles is the result of projection effects, i.e., the $\gamma$-ray bright jets are viewed at preferentially
smaller angles. Indeed, using Monte-Carlo simulation together with the Generalized Lambda Distribution
technique we have derived probability density functions of viewing angle for the LAT-detected and
non-LAT-detected sources (Fig.~\ref{fig3}, right), showing that jets of the $\gamma$-ray bright AGN tend to
have smaller angles to the line of sight comparing to those of $\gamma$-ray weak AGN, with median
values $6^\circ$ and $12^\circ$, respectively.
\section{Jet shapes
To study shapes of the outflows, we analyzed dependence between jet widths $d=(D^2-b^2_\varphi)^{1/2}$
derived from the profiles transverse to the local jet direction and angular separation $r$ measured
along the reconstructed total intensity ridge line. We assumed a power-law dependence $d\propto r^k$
and searched for the best fit space parameters using $\chi^2$ minimization (Fig.~\ref{fig4}, left).
The distribution of the derived power-law index $k$ presented in Fig.~\ref{fig4}, (right) peaks at values
close to 1, suggesting that parsec-scale AGN jets typically manifest a shape close to conical. At the same time,
a number of sources show $k$ values significantly smaller than 1, indicating that the jets undergo collimation
on scales probed by our observations (e.g., $k=0.47\pm0.01$ for M\,87).
BL Lacs and quasars have similar $k$-distributions, with the means of $1.13\pm0.06$ and $1.01\pm0.04$,
respectively, whereas galaxies show on average smaller $k=0.83\pm0.12$, most probably because
these objects are systematically closer, and their jets are oriented at larger angles to the line of sight,
allowing us to probe the jet regions at shorter linear separations from the central engine where the outflows
become organized more effectively \cite{Hada13}.
\begin{figure}
\centering
\includegraphics[height=.48\textwidth,angle=-90]{fig4a.eps}\hspace{0.3cm}
\includegraphics[height=.48\textwidth,angle=-90]{fig4b.eps}
\caption{{\it Left:} Jet width $d$ vs distance $r$ for BL Lac. The blue line is the best fit of an
assumed power-law dependence $d\propto r^k$. {\it Right:} Distribution of the power-law index $k$,
with a peak at $k\sim1$ implying that a jet shape is close to conical for most parsec-scale AGN outflows.}
\label{fig4}
\end{figure}
|
\section{Introduction}
The classical Goldberg-Sachs theorem \cite{Goldberg2009} states that \emph{a four-dimensional Ricci-flat Lorentzian manifold $(\mcM,\bm{g})$ admits a shear-free congruence of null geodesics if and only if its Weyl tensor is algebraically special}. Here, the property of being algebraically special is based on the Petrov classification of the Weyl tensor \cite{Petrov2000}. Since its original publication in 1962 the theorem has been generalised along two main directions:
\begin{itemize}
\item First, it was shown to hold for \emph{Einstein} Lorentzian manifolds, i.e. $R_{ab}=\Lambda \, g_{ab}$ for some constant $\Lambda$, and more general energy momentum tensors, such as $R_{ab}=\Lambda \, g_{ab}+\Phi \,k_a k_b$, for some function $\Phi$ and $1$-form $k_a$ with $k_a k_b g^{ab}=0$. Even weaker conditions involving the Cotton tensor
have been formulated \cites{Kundt1962,Robinson1963} for which the theorem holds too, thereby highlighting its \emph{conformal invariance}.
\item Second, the theorem admits versions in any metric signatures \cites{Przanowski1983,Nurowski1993,Nurowski1996,Apostolov1997,Nurowski2002,Gover2011}, providing, among others, an interesting result in four-dimensional Riemannian geometry stating that \emph{a four-dimensional Einstein Riemannian manifold locally admits a Hermitian structure if and only if its Weyl tensor is algebraically special}. The key to the understanding of this generalisation is the fact that in four dimensions, a shear-free congruence of null geodesics and a Hermitian structure are both equivalent to an \emph{integrable totally null complex $2$-plane distribution}. The distinction between them is made by different reality structures. Thus, the Goldberg-Sachs theorem relates the existence of integrable null $2$-plane distributions to the algebraic speciality of the Weyl tensor.
\end{itemize}
The recent interest in solutions of Einstein equations in higher dimensions has generated much research into the generalisation of the Petrov classification of the Weyl tensor and the Goldberg-Sachs theorem to higher dimensions. One approach to the problem, advocated by \cites{Hughston1988,Nurowski2002}, is to consider an \emph{(almost) null structure}, i.e. a totally null complex $m$-plane distribution, on a $2m$-dimensional (pseudo-)Riemannian manifold. Their importance in higher-dimensional black holes was highlighted in \cite{Mason2010}. Motivated by the conformal invariance and the underlying complex geometry of the theorem in dimension four, one of the authors (AT-C) proved a Goldberg-Sachs theorem in dimension five in \cite{Taghavi-Chabert2011} and higher in \cite{Taghavi-Chabert2012}. Particularly relevant here is the version of the theorem in dimension $2m+1$, in which an almost null structure is also defined to be a totally null complex $m$-plane distribution $\mcN$, say. The difference now is that $\mcN$ has an orthogonal complement $\mcN^\perp$ of rank $m+1$, and the crucial point, here, is that the theorem of \cite{Taghavi-Chabert2012} gives sufficient, conformally invariant, conditions on the Weyl tensor and the Cotton tensor for the integrability of \emph{both $\mcN$ and $\mcN^\perp$}, i.e.
$[ \Gamma ( \mcN ) , \Gamma ( \mcN ) ] \subset \Gamma ( \mcN )$ and $[ \Gamma ( \mcN^\perp ) , \Gamma ( \mcN^\perp ) ] \subset \Gamma ( \mcN^\perp )$. More refined algebraic classifications of the curvature tensors depending on the concept of almost null structure can be found in \cites{Taghavi-Chabert2012a,Taghavi-Chabert2013,Taghavi-Chabert2014} inspired by \cite{Jeffryes1995}. An alternative approach to the classification of the Weyl tensor of higher-dimensional Lorentzian manifolds is given in \cite{Coley2004}, and a Goldberg-Sachs theorem in this setting has been given in \cites{Durkee2009,Ortaggio2012a,Ortaggio2013a}.
The aim of this paper is to consider yet another generalisation, by formulating the theorem in \emph{three dimensions}. A priori, one would expect such a putative Goldberg-Sachs theorem to follow the same lines as in four and higher dimensions. However, there are a number of features of (pseudo-)Riemannian geometry specific to dimension three that prevent such a straightforward generalisation.
\begin{itemize}
\item First, there is no Weyl tensor.
\item Then, Einstein metrics are necessarily of constant curvature.
\item Finally, an almost null structure (i.e. a totally null (complex) line distribution) $\mcN$ is always integrable, and the (conformally invariant) condition that its orthogonal complement $\mcN^\perp$ be integrable too does not impose any constraint on the curvature. Related to this is the fact that congruences of null geodesics are necessarily shear-free.
\end{itemize}
To remedy these shortcomings, one is led to seek stronger conditions that must depend on the \emph{metric} rather than the conformal structure of our manifold. To this end, we shall exploit the following special features of three-dimensional (pseudo-)Riemannian geometry.
\begin{itemize}
\item From an algebraic point of view, the tracefree Ricci tensor $\Phi_{ab}$ in dimension three behaves in the same way as the (anti-)self-dual Weyl tensor in dimension four, since they both belong to a five-dimensional irreducible (complex) representation of $\SL(2,\C)$ or any of its real forms. This leads to a notion of \emph{algebraically special} tracefree Ricci tensors in dimension three analogous to the one on the (anti-)self-dual Weyl tensor in dimension four, and a notion of \emph{multiple principal null structure}, i.e. a preferred (complex) null line distribution.
\item The Cotton tensor $A_{abc}$ can be Hodge-dualised to yield a tracefree symmetric tensor $(*A)_{ab}$ of valence $2$, and must then belong to the same (complex) representation as $\Phi_{ab}$.
\item These properties allow us to weaken the Einstein equations to the equations governing \emph{topological massive gravity}, \cites{Deser1982}, which relate $\Phi_{ab}$ and $(*A)_{ab}$ as
\begin{align*}
\Phi_{ab} & = \frac{1}{m} (*A)_{ab} \, , &
R & = 6 \, \Lambda = \mbox{constant} \, ,
\end{align*}
where $\Lambda$ is the cosmological constant and $m$ is a `mass' parameter. In analogy to the Einstein equations, these equations can also be written as
\begin{align*}
R_{ab} - \frac{1}{2} g_{ab} R + \Lambda \, g_{ab} - \frac{1}{m} (*A)_{ab} & = 0 \, .
\end{align*}
\item There is a natural \emph{non-conformally invariant} condition that a (multiple principal) null structure $\mcN$ can satisfy, namely that not only $\mcN$ and $\mcN^\perp$ be integrable, but that $\mcN^\perp$ be \emph{totally geodetic}, i.e. $\bm{g} ( \nabla_{\bm{X}} \bm{Y} , \bm{Z} ) = 0$ for all $\bm{X}, \bm{Y} \in \Gamma ( \mcN^\perp )$, $\bm{Z} \in \Gamma(\mcN)$.
\end{itemize}
Reality conditions imposed on the top of these features will also yield various geometric interpretations of a null structure in terms of congruences of \emph{real} curves. With these considerations in mind, we shall prove ultimately the following theorem.
\begin{thm}\label{thm-GS-intro}
Let $(\mcM, \bm{g})$ be a three-dimensional Lorentzian manifold satisfying the topological massive gravity equations. Then the tracefree Ricci tensor is algebraically special if and only if $(\mcM,\bm{g})$ admits a divergence-free congruence of null geodesics (i.e. it is a Kundt spacetime) or a shear-free congruence of timelike geodesics.
\end{thm}
In fact, it is shown in reference \cite{Chow2010} that a Kundt spacetime that is also a solution of the topological massive gravity equations must be algebraically special, while the converse is left as an open problem. Theorem \ref{thm-GS-intro} thus gives an answer to this question.
The strategy adapted in this paper is to use a Newman-Penrose formalism and the Petrov classification of the tracefree Ricci tensor in dimension three. While these have already been used in \cite{Milson2013}, we develop these tools from scratches, and our conventions will certainly differ. Theorem \ref{thm-GS-intro} will in fact follow from more general theorems that we shall prove in the course of the article. A number of solutions of the topological massive gravity equations have been discovered in recent years, see \cites{Chow2010a,Chow2010} and references therein. In a subsequent paper, we shall give further explicit algebraically special solutions of the topological massive gravity equations.
The structure of the paper is as follows. In section \ref{sec-geom-cons}, we set up the scene with a short introduction of the Newman-Penrose formalism, and we review the background on the general geometric properties of null structures on (pseudo-)Riemannian manifolds in dimension three. Particularly relevant here are the notions of co-integrable and co-geodetic null structures of Definition \ref{defn-geom-prop}, the latter being central to the Goldberg-Sachs theorem.
This is taken further in section \ref{sec-real-metrics} where we examine the consequences of the reality conditions on a null structure, which may be understood as a congruence of curves that are either null or timelike. Propositions \ref{prop-co2timegeod} and \ref{prop-co2nullgeod} in particular give real interpretations of co-integrable and co-geodetic null structures.
Section \ref{sec-alg-class} focuses on the algebraic classification of the tracefree Ricci tensor. We introduce the definition of algebraically special Ricci tensors in Definition \ref{defn-alg-spec} based on the notion of principal null structure of Definitions \ref{defn-principal} and \ref{defn-multiple}. This leads to definitions of the complex Petrov types in section \ref{sec-Petrov-types-complex}, and their real signature-dependent analogues in sections \ref{sec-Petrov-types-Euc} and \ref{sec-Petrov-types-Lor}.
Curvature conditions for the existence of co-geodetic and parallel null structures are given in Proposition \ref{prop-integrability-cond} of section \ref{sec-curvature-cond}.
The main results of this paper are contained in section \ref{sec-GS}. We initially give general results for a metric of any signature. We first give in Proposition \ref{prop-obstruction-GS} obstructions for a multiple principal null structure to be co-geodetic in terms of the Cotton tensor and the derivatives of the Ricci scalar. We then show in Theorems \ref{thm-GS-II-gen}, \ref{thm-GS-III-gen}, \ref{thm-GS-N-gen} and \ref{thm-GS-D-gen} how the various algebraically special Petrov types guarantee the existence of a co-geodetic null structure. The converse, that a co-geodetic null structure implies algebraic speciality, is given in Theorem \ref{thm-GS-hard}. The application to topological massive gravity in Theorem \ref{thm-GS-TMG} then follows naturally. The section is wrapped up by giving real versions \ref{thm-Lor-GS-TMG} and \ref{thm-Riem-GS-TMG} of the Goldberg-Sachs theorem.
We end the paper with three appendices. Appendix \ref{app-spinor-calculus} contains a spinor calculus in three dimensions, which we then apply in Appendix \ref{sec-NP} to derive a Newman-Penrose formalism adapted to a null structure. Finally, in Appendix \ref{sec-GS-spinor} we have given alternative, manifestly invariant, proofs of the main theorems of section \ref{sec-GS} in the language of spinors.
\paragraph{Acknowledgments} This work was supported by the Polish National Science Center (NCN) via DEC-2013/09/B/ST1/01799. One of the authors (AT-C) has benefited from an Eduard \v{C}ech Institute postdoctoral fellowship GPB201/12/G028, and a GA\v{C}R (Czech Science Foundation) postdoctoral grant GP14-27885P. He would also like to thank the Centrum Fizyki Teoretycznej PAN for hospitality and financial support during his stay in Warsaw in the period 17-24 January 2015.
\section{Geometric considerations}\label{sec-geom-cons}
Throughout this section, we consider an oriented three-dimensional (pseudo-)Riemannian smooth manifold $(\mcM,\bm{g})$. We shall make use of the abstract index notation of \cite{Penrose1984}. Upstairs and downstairs lower case Roman indices will refer to vector fields and $1$-forms on $\mcM$ respectively, e.g. $V^a$ and $\alpha_a$, and similarly for more general tensor fields, e.g. $T \ind{_{ab}^c_d}$. Symmetrisation will be denoted by round brackets around a set of indices, and skew-symmetrisation by squared brackets, e.g. $A_{(ab)} = \frac{1}{2} \left( A_{ab} + A_{ba} \right)$ and $B_{[ab]} = \frac{1}{2} \left( B_{ab} - B_{ba} \right)$. Indices will be lowered and raised by the metric $g_{ab}$ and its inverse $g^{ab}$ whenever needs arise, e.g. $V_a = V^b g_{ba}$ and $\alpha^a = g^{ab} \alpha_b$, etc... Bold font will be used for vectors, forms and tensors whenever the index notation is suspended.
The space of sections of a given vector bundle $E$, say, over $\mcM$, will be denoted $\Gamma(E)$. The Lie bracket of two vector fields $\bm{V}$ and $\bm{W}$ will be denoted by $[ \bm{V} ,\bm{W}]$.
The orientation on $\mcM$ will be given by a volume form $e_{abc}$ on $\mcM$ satisfying the normalisation conditions
\begin{align}\label{eq-vol-form^2}
e_{abc} e^{def} & = (-1)^q 6 \, g \ind*{_{[a}^d} g \ind*{_b^e} g \ind*{_{c]}^f} \, , &
e_{abe} e^{cde} & = (-1)^q 2 \, g \ind*{_{[a}^c} g \ind*{_{b]}^d} \, , & e_{acd} e^{bcd} & = (-1)^q 2 \, g \ind*{_a^b} \, , &
e_{abc} e^{abc} & = (-1)^q 6 \, ,
\end{align}
where $q$ is the number of negative eigenvalues of the metric $g_{ab}$. We can then eliminate $2$-forms in favour of $1$-forms by means of the Hodge duality operation, i.e.
\begin{align*}
(*\alpha)_a & := \frac{1}{2} e \ind{_a^{bc}} \alpha_{bc} \, ,
\end{align*}
for any $2$-form $\alpha_{ab}$.
The Levi-Civita connection of $g_{ab}$, i.e. the unique torsion-free connection preserving $g_{ab}$, will be denoted $\nabla_a$. The Riemann curvature tensor associated with $\nabla$ is defined by
\begin{align*}
R \ind{_{a b d} ^c} V^d := 2 \, \nabla_{\lb{a}} \nabla_{\rb{b}} V^c \, .
\end{align*}
In three dimensions, the Riemann tensor decomposes as
\begin{align}\label{eq-Riemann}
R _{ a b c d } & = 4 \, g _{\lb{a} | \lb{c}} \Phi _{\rb{d}|\rb{b}} + \frac{1}{3} \, R \, g _{\lb{a} | \lb{c}} g _{\rb{d}|\rb{b}} \, ,
\end{align}
where $\Phi_{a b} := R_{ab} - \frac{1}{3} R g_{ab}$ and $R$ are tracefree part of the Ricci tensor $R \ind{_{ab}} := R \ind{_{acb}^c}$ and the Ricci scalar respectively. In three dimensions, the Bianchi identity $\nabla_{[a} R _{bc]de} = 0$ is equivalent to the contracted Bianchi identity
\begin{align}\label{eq-Bianchi-contracted}
\nabla^b \Phi \ind{_{ba}} - \frac{1}{6} \nabla _a R & = 0 \, .
\end{align}
For future use, we define the \emph{Schouten} or \emph{Rho} tensor
\begin{align*}
\Rho_{ab} & := - \Phi_{ab} - \frac{1}{12} R g_{ab} \, .
\end{align*}
To eliminate the use of fractions, we also set
\begin{align*}
S & := \frac{1}{12} R \, .
\end{align*}
With this convention, the \emph{Cotton tensor} takes the form
\begin{align}\label{eq-Cotton}
A_{a b c} & := 2 \, \nabla_{[b} \Rho _{c] a} = - 2 \, \nabla_{[b} \Phi_{c]a} + 2 \, g_{a[b} \, \nabla_{c]} S \, .
\end{align}
By construction, the Cotton tensor $A_{abc}$ satisfies the symmetry $A_{[a b c]} = 0$ and $A \ind{^a _{a b}} = 0$. It also satisfies the condition
\begin{align}\label{eq-divCotton}
\nabla^a A_{abc} & = 0 \, ,
\end{align}
since commuting the covariant derivatives and using \eqref{eq-Bianchi-contracted} and \eqref{eq-Riemann} give
\begin{align*}
\nabla^a A_{abc} & = - 2 \, \nabla^a \nabla_{[b} \Phi_{c]a} + \cancel{ 2 \, \nabla_{[b} \, \nabla_{c]} S} = \cancel{- 4 \, \nabla_{[b} \nabla_{c]} S } + \cancel{2 \, R \ind{^a_{[bc]}^d} \Phi_{da}} + \cancel{2 \, \Phi \ind{_{[b}^d} \Phi_{|c]d} } = 0 \, .
\end{align*}
It is more convenient to Hodge-dualise $A_{abc}$ to obtain the tensor of valence $2$
\begin{align}\label{eq-Cotton-dual}
(*A)_{ab} & := \frac{1}{2} e \ind{_b^{cd}} A \ind{_{acd}} \, .
\end{align}
Dualising a second time over $ab$ yields $e \ind{_a^{bc}} (*A)_{bc} = A \ind{^b_{ba}} = 0$, which means that $(*A)_{ab}=(*A)_{(ab)}$. The Cotton tensor can then be expressed by
\begin{align*}
(*A)_{ab} & = - e \ind{_{(a|}^{cd}} \nabla_{c} \Phi _{d |b)} \, .
\end{align*}
\subsection{Null structures in dimension three}
For the time being, we shall keep the discussion general, by considering an oriented three-dimensional (pseudo-)Riemannian manifold $(\mcM,\bm{g})$ of any signature. We shall denote the complexification of the tangent bundle by $\Tgt^\C \mcM$. It will be often convenient to consider a complex-valued metric $\bm{g}^\C$ by extending $\bm{g}$ via
\begin{align*}
\bm{g}^\C ( \bm{X}+ \ii \bm{Y} , \bm{Z}+ \ii \bm{W} ) & = \bm{g} ( \bm{X} , \bm{Z} ) - \bm{g} ( \bm{Y} , \bm{W} ) + \ii \left( \bm{g} ( \bm{X} , \bm{W} ) + \bm{g} ( \bm{Y} , \bm{Z} ) \right) \, ,
\end{align*}
for all $\bm{X}, \bm{Y}, \bm{Z}, \bm{W} \in \Gamma( \Tgt \mcM)$. For the remaining part of the paper, we shall omit the ${}^\C$ on $\bm{g}^\C$. It should be clear from the context whether we are using $\bm{g}$ or $\bm{g}^\C$.
Let $\mcN$ be a line subbundle of the complexified tangent bundle $\Tgt^\C \mcM := \C \otimes \Tgt \mcM$, null with respect to the complexified metric, i.e. for any section $k^a$ of $\mcN$, $g_{ab} k^a k^b = 0$, and $\mcN^\perp$ the orthogonal complement of $\mcN$ with respect to $g_{ab}$, i.e. at any point $p$ in $\mcM$,
\begin{align*}
\mcN^\perp_p & := \left\{ V^a \in \Tgt^\C_p \mcM : V^a k^b g_{ab} = 0 \, , \mbox{for all $k^a \in \mcN_p$} \right\} \, .
\end{align*}
We thus have a filtration $\mcN \subset \mcN^\perp$ on $\Tgt^\C \mcM$.
\begin{defn}\label{defn-almost-null}
We shall refer to a real or complex null line distribution on $(\mcM,\bm{g})$ as a \emph{null structure}.
\end{defn}
This is a three-dimensional specialisation of the notion of \emph{almost null structures} presented in \cites{Taghavi-Chabert2012} (also referred to as \emph{$\gamma$-plane distributions} in \cite{Taghavi-Chabert2013}). Since $\mcN$ is one-dimensional, $\mcN$ is clearly automatically formally integrable, i.e. $[ \Gamma ( \mcN ) , \Gamma ( \mcN ) ] \subset \Gamma ( \mcN )$, and we can unambiguously dispense with the word `almost' in Definition \ref{defn-almost-null}.
\subsection{Rudiments of Newman-Penrose formalism}
For most of the paper, it will be convenient to use the Newman-Penrose formalism as described in details in Appendix \ref{sec-NP}. To do this we introduce a frame of $\Tgt^\C \mcM$ as follows. We fix a section $k^a$ of a given null structure $\mcN$, and choose a vector field $\ell^a$ such that $k^a \ell^b g_{ab} = 1$. Clearly, $\ell^a$ is transversal to $\mcN^\perp$. We also choose a section $n^a$ of $\mcN^\perp$, not in $\mcN$, which we may normalise as $n^a n_a = -\frac{1}{2}$.
\begin{defn}
We say that a frame $( k^a , \ell^a , n^a )$ is \emph{adapted to a null structure $\mcN$ on $(\mcM,\bm{g})$} if and only if $k^a$ generates $\mcN$ and the metric can be expressed as
\begin{align}\label{eq-complex-metric}
g_{ab} & = 2 \, k_{(a} \ell_{b)} - 2 \, n_a n_b \, .
\end{align}
\end{defn}
In fact, we have a class of frames adapted to the null structure, and any two frames in that class are related via the transformation
\begin{align}\label{eq-adapted-modulo}
k^a & \mapsto a k^a \, , &
n^a & \mapsto b \left( n^a + z k^a \right) \, , &
\ell^a & = a^{-1} \left( \ell^a + 2 z n^a + z^2 k^a \right) \, .
\end{align}
for some functions $a$, $z$ and $b$ where $a$ is non-vanishing and $b^2=1$.
We can expand the covariant derivatives of the adapted frame vectors as follows
\begin{align}
\nabla_a k^b & = 2 \, \gamma \, k_a k^b + 2 \, \epsilon \, \ell_a k^b - 4 \, \alpha \, n_a k^b - 2 \, \tau \, k_a n^b - 2 \, \kappa \, \ell_a n^b + 4 \, \rho \, n_a n^b \, , \label{eq-nablak} \\
\nabla_a \ell^b & = - 2 \, \epsilon \, \ell_a \ell^b - 2 \, \gamma \, k_a \ell^b + 4 \, \alpha \, n_a \ell^b + 2 \, \pi \, \ell_a n^b + 2 \, \nu \, k_a n^b - 4 \, \mu \, n_a n^b \, , \label{eq-nablal}\\
\nabla_a n^b & = - \kappa \, \ell_a \ell^b + \nu k_a k^b + \pi \, \ell_a k^b - \tau \, k_a \ell^b + 2 \, \rho \, n_a \ell^b - 2 \, \mu \, n_a k^b \, , \label{eq-nablau}
\end{align}
where $\alpha$, $\gamma$, $\epsilon$, $\kappa$, $\mu$, $\nu$, $\pi$, $\rho$, and $\tau$ are the connection coefficients, also known as \emph{Newman-Penrose coefficients}. We shall also introduce the following notation for the frame derivatives:
\begin{align*}
D & := k^a \nabla_a \, , & \Delta & := \ell^a \nabla_a \, , & \delta & := n^a \nabla_a \, .
\end{align*}
The curvature components of $\nabla_a$ and the Bianchi identies can then be expressed in terms of these coefficients and derivatives thereof, and their full description, also given in Appendix \ref{sec-NP}, is known as the \emph{Newman-Penrose equations}.
\subsection{Geometric properties}
While a null structure $\mcN$ is always integrable, the following definition gives additional geometric conditions that $\mcN$ can satisfy -- these are related to the notion of \emph{intrinsic torsion} examined in \cite{Taghavi-Chabert2013}.
\begin{defn}\label{defn-geom-prop}
Let $\mcN$ be a null structure on $(\mcM,\bm{g})$. We say that
\begin{itemize}
\item $\mcN$ is \emph{co-integrable} if its orthogonal complement $\mcN^\perp$ is formally integrable, i.e.
\begin{align}\label{integrableN}
[ \Gamma ( \mcN^\perp ) , \Gamma ( \mcN^\perp ) ] & \subset \Gamma ( \mcN^\perp ) \, ;
\end{align}
\item $\mcN$ is \emph{co-geodetic} if its orthogonal complement $\mcN^\perp$ is formally totally geodetic, i.e.
\begin{align}\label{geodetic-Nperp}
\bm{g} ( \nabla_{\bm{X}} \bm{Y} , \bm{Z} ) & = 0 \, , & \mbox{for all $\bm{X}, \bm{Y} \in \Gamma ( \mcN^\perp )$, $\bm{Z} \in \Gamma(\mcN)$;}
\end{align}
\item $\mcN$ is \emph{parallel} if $\nabla_{\bm{Y}} \bm{X} \in \Gamma(\mcN)$ for all $\bm{X} \in \Gamma(\mcN)$, $\bm{Y} \in \Gamma (\Tgt \mcM)$.
\end{itemize}
\end{defn}
Using the standard formula $[ \bm{X},\bm{Y}] = \nabla_{\bm{X}} \bm{Y} - \nabla_{\bm{Y}} \bm{X}$ for any vector fields $\bm{X}, \bm{Y} \in \Gamma (\Tgt^\C \mcM)$, one can prove the following lemma \cite{Taghavi-Chabert2013}.
\begin{lem}
Let $\mcN$ be a null structure on $(\mcM,\bm{g})$. Then
\begin{align*}
\mbox{$\mcN$ is parallel} && \Rightarrow && \mbox{$\mcN$ is co-geodetic} && \Rightarrow && \mbox{ $\mcN$ is co-integrable.}
\end{align*}
\end{lem}
\begin{rem}
Note that in three dimensions, unlike in higher odd dimensions, a null structure $\mcN$ automatically satisfies $\nabla_{\bm{Y}} \bm{X} \in \Gamma(\mcN^\perp)$ for all $\bm{X} \in \Gamma(\mcN)$, $\bm{Y} \in \Gamma(\Tgt \mcM)$, as can be read off from \eqref{eq-nablak}.
\end{rem}
\begin{rem}
Of the three geometric properties listed in Definition \ref{defn-geom-prop}, only the property that $\mcN$ be co-integrable is conformally invariant since it depends only on the Lie bracket. The remaining properties break conformal invariance -- see \cite{Taghavi-Chabert2013} for details.
\end{rem}
It is convenient to re-express condition \eqref{integrableN} and \eqref{geodetic-Nperp} in terms of the Levi-Civita connection as given in the following proposition.
\begin{prop}\label{prop-intrinsic-torsion}
Let $\mcN$ be a null structure on $(\mcM,\bm{g})$, and let $k^a$ be a generator of $\mcN$. Then
\begin{align}
\mbox{$\mcN$ is co-integrable}
& & \Longleftrightarrow & & k _{[a} \nabla_b k_{c]} & = 0
& & \Longleftrightarrow & \left( k^b \nabla_b k^{[a} \right) k^{b]} & = 0 \, , \label{eq-equiv-integrable} \\
\mbox{$\mcN$ is co-geodetic}
& & \Longleftrightarrow & &
k^a \nabla_b k^b - k^b \nabla_b k^a & = 0
& & \Longleftrightarrow &
k_{[a} \left( \nabla_{b]} k_{[c} \right) k_{d]} & = 0 \, . \label{eq-equiv-strongly}
\end{align}
\end{prop}
\begin{rem}
Conditions \eqref{eq-equiv-integrable} tell us that any generator of $\mcN$ is formally geodetic, or equivalently in three dimensions, formally twist-free, or equivalently, formally shear-free, i.e. $\mcL_k g_{ab} \propto g_{ab} \pmod{ k_{(a} \alpha_{b)}}$.
Conditions \eqref{eq-equiv-strongly} tell us that any generator of $\mcN$ is formally geodetic and divergence-free.
\end{rem}
\begin{proof}
Let $k^a$ be a generator of $\mcN$. In terms of the Newman-Penrose coefficients, we have
\begin{align*}
\mbox{$\mcN$ is co-integrable}
& & \Longleftrightarrow & & \kappa = 0 \, ,
\end{align*}
which follows from
\begin{align*}
[ D , \delta ] & = 2 \, \rho \delta
+ \left( \pi - 2 \, \alpha \right) D - \kappa \Delta \, . \tag{\ref{commutator0001}}
\end{align*}
On the other hand, comparison with
\begin{align}
\left( D k^{[a} \right) k^{b]} & = - 4 \, \kappa \, n^{[a} k^{b]} \, , & k _{[a} \nabla_b k_{c]} & = - 4 \, \kappa \, k_{[a} \ell_b n_{c]} \, , \nonumber
\end{align}
establishes the equivalence \eqref{eq-equiv-integrable}.
Further, since \eqref{geodetic-Nperp} can be expressed as $n^a D k_a = 2 \, \kappa$ and $n^a \delta k_a = 2 \, \rho$ in our null basis, we have
\begin{align*}
\mbox{$\mcN$ is co-geodetic}
& & \Longleftrightarrow & & \kappa = \rho = 0 \, .
\end{align*}
Comparison with
\begin{align*}
k^a \nabla_b k^b - D k^a & = 4 \left( \kappa \, n^a - \rho \, k^a \right) \, ,
\end{align*}
establishes the equivalence \eqref{eq-equiv-strongly}.
\end{proof}
Another way to express the condition for a null structure to be co-geodetic is given by the following proposition.
\begin{prop}\label{prop-closed-coclosed}
Locally, there is a one-to-one correspondence between closed and co-closed complex-valued $1$-forms and co-geodetic null structures.
\end{prop}
\begin{proof}
We note that a co-integrable null structure $\mcN$ is equivalent to its generator $k^a$, say, satisfying $k_{[a} \nabla_b k_{c]} =0$ since $k_a$ is also the annihilator of $\mcN^\perp$. We can always rescale $k^a$ to make it closed, i.e. $\nabla_{[b} k_{c]} =0$ -- for details, see Lemma 5.1 in \cite{Hill2009}. In this case, $k^a$ also satisfies $k^a \nabla_a k^b =0$. If in addition $\mcN$ is co-geodetic, then using the equivalence \eqref{eq-equiv-strongly}, we have $\nabla^a k_a =0$, i.e. $k^a$ is coclosed. The converse is also true.
\end{proof}
A generalisation to higher dimensions applicable to higher valence spinor fields in the analytic case is given in \cite{Taghavi-Chabert2013}.
As we shall see in the next section, the differential conditions on a null structure $\mcN$ will yield quite different geometric interpretations depending on the signature of $\bm{g}$.
\subsection{Relation to harmonic morphisms}
\begin{defn}[\cites{Baird1988,Baird1995}]
Let $\varphi : \mcM \rightarrow \C$ be a complex-valued smooth map on $\mcM$. We say that $\varphi$ is \emph{horizontal conformal} if it satisfies $(\nabla^a \varphi ) ( \nabla_a \varphi ) = 0$, and a \emph{harmonic morphism} if it satisfies $( \nabla^a \varphi ) ( \nabla_a \varphi ) = \nabla^a \nabla_a \varphi = 0$.
\end{defn}
With reference to the proof of Proposition \ref{prop-closed-coclosed}, we can rescale a generator $k^a$ of a co-integrable null structure $\mcN$ such that $k_a = \nabla_a \varphi$. Since such a $k^a$ is null, $\varphi$ is a horizontal conformal map. If $\mcN$ is also co-geodetic, $k_a$ is also co-closed and $\varphi$ must be a harmonic morphism. Summarising,
\begin{cor}
On a three-dimensional (pseudo-)Riemannian manifold, locally, there is a one-to-one correspondence between
\begin{itemize}
\item horizontal conformal maps and co-integrable null structures;
\item harmonic morphisms and co-geodetic null structures.
\end{itemize}
\end{cor}
\section{Real metrics}\label{sec-real-metrics}
As before, $(\mcM,\bm{g})$ will denote an oriented three-dimensional (pseudo-)Riemannian manifold. So far the discussion has been independent of the signature of the metric $\bm{g}$. Different metric signatures will induce different reality conditions on $\Tgt^\C \mcM$, and consequently, different geometric interpretations of a null stucture $\mcN$. As is standard, the complex conjugate of $\mcN$ will be denoted $\overline{\mcN}$. We start with the following definition.
\begin{defn}[\cites{Kopczy'nski1992,Kopczy'nski1997}]
The \emph{real index} of a null structure $\mcN$ on $(\mcM,\bm{g})$ at a point $p$ is the dimension of the intersection $\mcN_p \cap \overline{\mcN}_p$.
\end{defn}
\begin{lem}[\cites{Kopczy'nski1992,Kopczy'nski1997}]
At any point, the real index of a null structure $\mcN$ on $(\mcM,\bm{g})$ must be
\begin{itemize}
\item $0$ when $\bm{g}$ has signature $(3,0)$;
\item either $0$ or $1$ when $\bm{g}$ has signature $(2,1)$.
\end{itemize}
\end{lem}
\subsection{Lorentzian signature}
Assume that $(\mcM , \bm{g})$ is an oriented Lorentzian manifold with signature $(2,1)$. The geometrical features of a null structure of real index $0$ or real index $1$ are discussed separately.
\subsubsection{Real index $0$}\label{sec-Lor0}
We shall exhibit the relation between null structures of real index $0$ and congruences of timelike curves. In particular, we shall also show that a \emph{co-geodetic} null structure is equivalent to the existence of a \emph{shear-free} congruence of timelike \emph{geodesics}.
Assume that $\mcN$ is of real index $0$. Then $\mcN$ is a complex distribution, whose real and imaginary parts span a spacelike distribution $\Re( \mcN \oplus \overline{\mcN})$. The orthogonal complement of $\Re( \mcN \oplus \overline{\mcN})$ is necessarily timelike and orthogonal to both $\mcN$ and $\overline{\mcN}$. Let $u^a$ be a unit timelike vector field generating this timelike distribution, i.e. $u^a$ satisfies $u^a u_a = -1$. There is a sign ambiguity in the definition of $u^a$, which can be fixed by a choice of time-orientation. In this case, the metric takes the form
\begin{align}\label{eq-al-contact-Lorentz-metric}
g_{ab} & = h_{ab} - u_a u_b \, .
\end{align}
where $h_{ab}$ is annhilated by $u^a$, i.e. $h_{ab} u^a =0$. The orientation of $(\mcM,\bm{g})$ given by the volume form $e_{abc}$ normalised as in \eqref{eq-vol-form^2} with $q=1$ allows us to Hodge-dualise
the timelike vector field $u^a$ to produce a $2$-form $\omega_{ab}$, i.e.
\begin{align*}
\omega_{ab} := - e _{abc} u^c \, .
\end{align*}
This in turns yields an endomorphism
\begin{align*}
J \ind{_a^b} & = \omega_{ac} g^{cb} \, ,
\end{align*}
on $\Tgt \mcM$, which can be seen to satisfy
\begin{align}\label{eq-contact-Lor-properties}
J \ind{_a^c} J \ind{_c^b} & = - h \ind{_a^b} \, , & u^b J \ind{_b^a} & = 0 \, .
\end{align}
This yields a splitting of the complexified tangent bundle
\begin{align*}
\Tgt^\C \mcM & = \Tgt^{(1,0)} \oplus \Tgt^{(0,1)} \oplus \Tgt^{(0,0)} \, ,
\end{align*}
where $\Tgt^{(1,0)}$, $\Tgt^{(0,1)}$ and $\Tgt^{(0,0)}$ are the $-\ii$-, $+\ii$- and $0$-eigenbundles of $J \ind{_a^b}$ respectively. In particular, a null structure of index $0$ yields a CR structure with a preferred splitting as described in \cite{Hill2009}.
In an adapted frame $( k^a , \ell^a , n^a )$, we have $u^a = \sqrt{2} n^a$ with the following reality conditions
\begin{align*}
( k^a , \ell^a , n^a ) \mapsto ( \overline{k^a} , \overline{\ell^a} , \overline{n^a} ) = ( \ell^a , k^a , n^a ) \, .
\end{align*}
Thus $\ell^a$ is the complex conjugate of $k^a$, and $n^a$ is real. If our orientation is chosen such that
\begin{align*}
e_{abc} & = 6 \ii k_{[a} \ell_b u_{c]} \, ,
\end{align*}
then $k^a$ and $\bar{k}^a := \ell^a$ satisfy
\begin{align*}
k^b J \ind{_b^a} & = \ii k^a \, , & \bar{k}^b J \ind{_b^a} & = - \ii \bar{k}^a \, .
\end{align*}
At this stage, we remark that a unit timelike vector field determines a congruence of oriented timelike geodesics, and conversely, given such a congruence, we can \emph{always} find a unit timelike vector field $u^a$ tangent to the curves of the congruence. Further, the effect of changing the orientation of $u^a$ will have the effect of interchanging the null structure $\mcN$ and its complex conjugate $\overline{\mcN}$. We can therefore summarise our results in the following way.
\begin{prop}
On an oriented and time-oriented three-dimensional Lorentzian manifold, there is a one-to-one correspondence between null structures and congruences of oriented timelike curves.
\end{prop}
It is convenient to encode the geometric properties of $\mcN$ and $\mcN^\perp$ in the covariant derivative of $u^a$. To characterise these properties, we decompose the covariant derivative of $u^a$ into irreducibles under the stabiliser of $u^a$ in $\SO(2,1)$ as recorded in the following definition.
\begin{defn} Let $u^a$ be a unit timelike vector field on $(\mcM,\bm{g})$ and $\mcU$ its associated congruence of oriented (timelike) curves. Then $\mcU$ is
\begin{itemize}
\item \emph{geodetic} if and only if
\begin{align}\label{eq-geodesy-sp}
u^b \nabla_b u^a & = 0 \, ;
\end{align}
\item \emph{twist-free} if and only if
\begin{align}\label{eq-twist-sp}
\left( \nabla_{[a} u_b \right) u_{c]} & = 0 \, ;
\end{align}
\item \emph{divergence-free} if and only if
\begin{align}\label{eq-dilation-sp}
\nabla^c u_c & = 0 \, ;
\end{align}
\item \emph{shear-free} if and only if
\begin{align}\label{eq-shear-sp}
\nabla_{(a} u_{b)} - \frac{1}{2} h_{ab} \nabla^c u_c + \left( u^c \nabla_c u_{(a} \right) u_{b)} & = 0 \, .
\end{align}
\end{itemize}
\end{defn}
Using the standard formula for the Lie derivative
\begin{align}\label{eq-shear-free-Lie2}
\mcL_u h_{ab} & = 2 \, \nabla_{(a} u_{b)} + 2 \left( u^c \nabla_c u_{(a} \right) u_{b)} \, ,
\end{align}
we can re-express the shear-free condition \eqref{eq-shear-sp} as
\begin{align}\label{eq-shear-free-Lie}
\mcL_u h_{ab} & = \Omega^2 \, h_{ab} \, ,
\end{align}
for some function $\Omega$.
These properties of the congruence $\mcU$ do not depend on the orientation of $u^a$, and thus also apply to congruences of unoriented curves.
\begin{prop}\label{prop-co2timegeod}
Let $\mcN$ be a null structure of real index $0$ on $(\mcM,\bm{g})$ equipped with a time-orientation, and let $\mcU$ be its associated congruence of oriented timelike curves. Then
\begin{itemize}
\item $\mcN$ is co-integrable if and only if $\mcU$ is shear-free;
\item $\mcN$ is co-geodetic if and only if $\mcU$ is shear-free and geodetic.
\end{itemize}
\end{prop}
\begin{proof}
In terms of the Newman-Penrose formalism, and with suitable reality conditions, we have
\begin{align}\label{eq-covderv-u}
\nabla_a u_b & = - \sqrt{2} \left( \bar{\kappa} k_a k_b + \kappa \bar{k}_a \bar{k}_b \right) + 2 \left( \bar{\rho} u_a k_b + \rho u_a \bar{k}_b \right) + \frac{\ii}{\sqrt{2}} ( \tau - \bar{\tau} ) \omega_{ab} - \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} (\tau + \bar{\tau}) h_{ab} \, ,
\end{align}
so that taking the irreducible components, we obtained
\begin{align*}
u^b \nabla_b u_a & = - 2 \left( \rho \, \bar{k}_a + \bar{\rho} \, k_a \right) \, , \\
\left( \nabla_{[a} u_b \right) u_{c]} & = \frac{\ii}{\sqrt{2}} \left( \tau - \bar{\tau} \, \right) \omega_{[ab} u_{c]} \, , \\
\nabla^a u_a & = - \sqrt{2} \left( \tau -\bar{\tau} \right) \, , \\
2 \nabla_{(a} u_{b)} - h_{ab} \nabla^c u_c + 2 \left( u^c \nabla_c u_{(a} \right) u_{b)} & = - 2 \sqrt{2} \left( \kappa \, \bar{k}_a \bar{k}_b + \bar{\kappa} \, k_a k_b \right) \, .
\end{align*}
The conclusion of the proof now follows from (the proof of) Proposition \ref{prop-intrinsic-torsion}.
\end{proof}
\paragraph{Local forms of metrics}
We now give the normal form of a metric admitting a shear-free congruence of timelike geodesics.
\begin{prop}\label{prop-normal-metric}
Let $(\mcM,\bm{g})$ be an oriented and time-oriented three-dimensional Lorentzian manifold admitting a co-integrable null structure $\mcN$, $k^a$ a section of $\mcN$ and $u^a$ the associated unit timelike vector field. Then, around each point, there exist coordinates $(t,z,\bar{z})$ such that the metric takes the form
\begin{align}
\bm{g} & = - \left( \dd t - \bar{p} \, \dd z - p \, \dd \bar{z} \right)^2 + 2 h^2 \dd z \, \dd \bar{z} \, , \label{eq-canon-met-SF} \\
\bm{k} & = h^{-1} \left( \partial_{\bar{\zeta}} + p \partial_t \right) \, , & \bm{u} & = \partial_t \, , \nonumber
\end{align}
where $h=h(z,\bar{z},t)$ and $p=p(z,\bar{z},t)$.
If $\mcN$ is co-geodetic, we have in addition
\begin{align}\label{eq-canon-met-Geod}
\partial_t p & = 0 \, .
\end{align}
\end{prop}
\begin{proof}
We first note that the complex-valued $1$-form $k_a$ satisfies $k_{[a} \nabla_b k_{c]} =0$. By a lemma of reference \cite{Hill2008}, $k_a$ can be put in the form $k_a = h \nabla_a \zeta$ for some real function $h$ and complex function $\zeta$ such that $\dd \zeta \wedge \dd \bar{\zeta} \neq 0$. We can therefore use $\zeta$ and its complex conjugate $\bar{\zeta}$ as complex coordinates on $(\mcM,\bm{g})$. We can also choose a real coordinate $t$ such that $u^a\nabla_a = \parderv{}{t}$. The metric must therefore take the form \eqref{eq-canon-met-SF}.
Further, the property that $u^a$ be geodetic can be expressed as
\begin{align*}
0 & = - u^b \nabla_b u_a = u^b \left(\nabla_a u_b - \nabla_b u_a \right) \, ,
\end{align*}
which leads to \eqref{eq-canon-met-Geod}.
\end{proof}
\begin{rem}\label{rem-contact-Lor}
One can check that a null structure $\mcN$ of real index $0$ on a three-dimensional Lorentzian manifold $(\mcM,\bm{g})$ is also known as an \emph{almost contact Lorentzian structure} -- see \cite{Calvaruso2011} for details and generalisation to higher odd dimensions. The contact distribution is precisely annihilated by the timelike vector field $u^a$. When the null structure is co-geodetic, the almost contact Lorentzian structure is said to be \emph{normal}.
\end{rem}
\subsubsection{Real index $1$}\label{sec-Lor1}
A null structure $\mcN$ of real index $1$ satisfies $\dim(\mcN_p \cap \overline{\mcN}_p)=1$ at every point $p \in \mcM$. In particular, since $\mcN$ is one-dimensional, it must be totally real.
We can therefore introduce a totally real basis $( k^a , \ell^a , u^a)$ of $\Tgt \mcM$, where $k^a$ is a generator of $\mcN$, $\ell^a$ a null vector field transversal to $\mcN^\perp$ such that $k^a \ell^b g_{ab} = 1$, and $u^a$ a unit spacelike vector field in $\mcN^\perp$, i.e. $u^a u_a =1$, and thus complementary to $k^a$ and $\ell^a$. The Lorentzian metric then takes the form
\begin{align}\label{eq-real-metric}
g_{ab} & = 2 \, k_{(a} \ell_{b)} + u_a u_b \, .
\end{align}
Setting $n^a = \frac{\ii}{\sqrt{2}} u^a$, an adapted frame $( k^a , \ell^a , n^a )$ can be recovered from $( k^a , \ell^a , u^a)$, in which case it satisfies the reality condition
\begin{align*}
( k^a , \ell^a , n^a ) \mapsto ( \overline{k^a} , \overline{\ell^a} , \overline{n^a} ) = ( k^a , \ell^a , -n^a ) \, .
\end{align*}
In what follows, we shall not be concerned with the orientation of $k^a$, i.e. whether it is past-pointing or future-pointing.
\begin{defn}
Let $\mcN$ be a null structure of real index $1$ on $(\mcM,\bm{g})$, and $k^a$ a section of $\mcN$. Let $\mcK$ be the congruence of null curves generated by $k^a$. Then $\mcK$ is
\begin{itemize}
\item \emph{geodetic} if and only if
\begin{align}\label{eq-null-geodetic}
\left( k^b \nabla_b k^{[a} \right) k^{b]} & = 0 \, ;
\end{align}
\item \emph{divergence-free geodetic} if and only if
\begin{align}\label{eq-null-non-expanding}
k^a \nabla_b k^b - k^b \nabla_b k^a & = 0 \, .
\end{align}
\end{itemize}
\end{defn}
\begin{defn}
A three-dimensional Lorentzian manifold equipped with a divergence-free congruence of null geodesics is called a \emph{Kundt spacetime}.
\end{defn}
\begin{rem}
In dimensions greater than three, congruences of null geodesics are also characterised by their \emph{shear} and \emph{twist}, and a Kundt spacetime is usually defined as a Lorentzian manifold equipped with a shear-free, twist-free and divergence-free congruence of null geodesics. However, in three dimensions, any congruence of null geodesics has vanishing shear and twist.
\end{rem}
From Proposition \ref{prop-intrinsic-torsion}, we now obtain the geometric interpretation of a null structure of real index $1$.
\begin{prop}\label{prop-co2nullgeod}
Let $\mcN$ be a null structure $\mcN$ of real index $1$ on $(\mcM,\bm{g})$. Then
\begin{itemize}
\item $\mcN$ is co-integrable if and only if it generates a congruence of null geodesics.
\item $\mcN$ is co-geodetic if and only if it generates a divergence-free congruence of null geodesics.
\end{itemize}
\end{prop}
\subsection{Euclidean signature}\label{sec-Euc}
Assume now $(\mcM , \bm{g})$ has Euclidean signature. Then a null structure is necessarily of real index $0$, and an adapted frame $\{ k^a , \ell^a , n^a \}$ will satisfy the reality conditions
\begin{align*}
\{ k^a , \ell^a , n^a \} \mapsto \{ \overline{k^a} , \overline{\ell^a} , \overline{n^a} \} = \{ \ell^a , k^a , -n^a \} \, .
\end{align*}
Set $\bar{k}^a := \ell^a$ and $u^a := \sqrt{2} \ii \, n^a$, so that $u^a$ is a real spacelike vector of unit norm, i.e. $u^a u_a = 1$. We can then write the metric \eqref{eq-complex-metric} as
\begin{align}\label{eq-al-contact-metric}
g_{ab} & = 2 \, k_{(a} \bar{k}_{b)} + u_a u_b \, .
\end{align}
Clearly, this setting is almost identical to the case where $(\mcM,\bm{g})$ has Lorentzian signature and is equipped with a null structure of real index $0$. The only difference is that now $u^a$ is spacelike, rather than timelike.
Real tensors $\omega_{ab}$ and $J \ind{_a^b}$ are defined in exactly the same manner as in the Lorentzian case, and we now have $h_{ab} = 2 \, k_{(a} \bar{k}_{b)} = g_{ab} - u_a u_b$.
The reader is invited to go through section \ref{sec-Lor0} with $u^a$ now spacelike.
\begin{rem}\label{rem-contact-Riem}
Following on from Remark \ref{rem-contact-Lor}, a null structure $\mcN$ on a three-dimensional Riemannian manifold $(\mcM,\bm{g})$ can be shown to be equivalent to an \emph{almost contact Riemannian (or metric) structure} -- see \cite{Chinea1990} and references therein for details.
\end{rem}
\section{Algebraic classification of the tracefree Ricci tensor}\label{sec-alg-class}
A special feature of the Riemann curvature of the Levi-Civita connection on a three-dimensional (pseudo-)Riemannian manifold $(\mcM,\bm{g})$ is that it is entirely determined by the Ricci tensor. Its tracefree part $\Phi _{ab}$ belongs to a five-dimensional irreducible representation of $\SO(3,\C)$, and as for the Weyl tensor in four dimensions, we can introduce the notion of principal null structure to classify $\Phi _{ab}$.
\begin{defn}\label{defn-principal}
Let $\mcN$ be a null structure. We say that it is \emph{principal} at a point $p$ of $\mcM$ if a null vector $\xi^a$ generating $\mcN_p$ satisfies
\begin{align}\label{eq-PND-eq}
\Phi_{ab} \xi^a \xi^b & = 0 \, ,
\end{align}
at $p$.
\end{defn}
Now, the space of all complex null vectors at a point is parametrised by points of the Riemann sphere $S^2 \cong \CP^1$. To be precise, using a standard chart on $\CP^1$, an arbitrary null vector, written in an adapted frame $(k^a,\ell^a,n^a)$, is of the form
\begin{align}\label{eq-arb-null-vec}
\xi^a (z) & = k^a + 2z \, n^a + z^2 \ell^a \, ,
\end{align}
for some $z \in \C$. The other standard chart on $\CP^1$ is simply obtained by sending $z$ to $z^{-1}$ in \eqref{eq-arb-null-vec}. Thus, to determine all the principal null structures at a point, it suffices to plug \eqref{eq-arb-null-vec} into
\eqref{eq-PND-eq} to form the quartic polynomial
\begin{align}\label{eq-Ricci-polynomial}
0 & = \Phi (z) := \frac{1}{2} \Phi_{ab} \xi^a (z) \xi^b (z) = \Phi _0 + 4 \, \Phi _1 z + 6 \, \Phi _2 z^2 + 4 \, \Phi _3 z^3 + \Phi _4 z^4 \, ,
\end{align}
in $\C$, where
\begin{align*}
\Phi_0 & := \frac{1}{2} \Phi _{ab} k^a k^b \, , &
\Phi_1 & := \frac{1}{2} \Phi _{ab} k^a n^b \, , &
\Phi_2 & := \frac{1}{2} \Phi _{ab} k^a \ell^a = \frac{1}{2} \Phi _{ab} n^a n^b \, , \\
\Phi_3 & := \frac{1}{2} \Phi _{ab} \ell^a n^b \, , &
\Phi_4 & := \frac{1}{2} \Phi _{ab} \ell^a \ell^b \, .
\end{align*}
Thus, a root $z$ of \eqref{eq-Ricci-polynomial} determines a principal null structure $\mcN$ where $\xi^a(z)$ generates $\mcN$ at a point. Conversely, any
principal null structure determines a unique root (up to multiplicity) of \eqref{eq-Ricci-polynomial} at a point. In particular, the algebraic classification of the tracefree Ricci tensor boils down to the classification of the roots of \eqref{eq-Ricci-polynomial} and their multiplicities. A full review of the classification of the Weyl tensor in four dimensions is given in \cite{Gover2011}, and we shall only recall their results closely following their terminology.
\begin{defn}\label{defn-multiple}
Let $\mcN$ be a principal null structure determined by a root $z$ of the associated polynomial \eqref{eq-Ricci-polynomial} at a point. We say that $\mcN$ is \emph{multiple} at that point if $z$ is multiple.
\end{defn}
\begin{defn}\label{defn-alg-spec}
We say that $\Phi_{ab}$ is \emph{algebraically special} at a point if it admits a multiple principal null structure at that point.
\end{defn}
Rather than considering the quartic polynomial \eqref{eq-Ricci-polynomial}, it is convenient to consider the quartic \emph{homogeneous} polynomial
\begin{align}\label{eq-Ricci-polynomial-spinor}
0 & = \Phi (z) = \Phi _{ABCD} \xi^A \xi^B \xi^C \xi^D \, ,
\end{align}
where $\xi^A$ are now complex homogeneous coordinates on $\CP^1$, and $\Phi _{ABCD}$ is an element of $\odot^4 (\C^2)^*$, with the understanding that the upper case Roman indices take the values $0$ and $1$. We can then recover \eqref{eq-Ricci-polynomial} by setting $\xi^A (z) = o^A + z \, \iota^A$ where $\{o^A, \iota^A\}$ is a basis of $\C^2$. The roots of \eqref{eq-Ricci-polynomial-spinor} then determine a unique factorisation (up to permutation of the factors)
\begin{align*}
0 & = \Phi (z) = (\xi^A \alpha_A) (\xi^B \beta_B) (\xi^C \gamma_C) (\xi^D \delta_D) \, ,
\end{align*}
where $\alpha_A$, $\beta_A$, $\gamma_A$ and $\delta_A$ are elements $(\C^2)^*$ defined up to scale. In this case, we can write
\begin{align*}
\Phi _{ABCD} & \propto \alpha_{(A} \beta_B \gamma_C \delta_{D)} \, .
\end{align*}
Multiplicities of the roots of \eqref{eq-Ricci-polynomial-spinor} will be mirrored by some of the corresponding $\alpha_A$, $\beta_A$, $\gamma_A$ and $\delta_A$ being proportional to each other.
\begin{rem}\label{rem-spinor-Petrov}
The above identification is $\Phi_{ab}$ with $\Phi _{ABCD}$ is a consequence of the local isomorphism of Lie groups $\SO(3,\C) \cong \SL(2,\C)$ as explained in Appendix \ref{app-spinor-calculus}, where $\C^2$ is identified with the spinor representation of $\SO(3,\C)$. This is virtually identical to the treatment of the (anti-)self-dual part of the Weyl tensor in four dimensions \cites{Petrov2000,Witten1959,Penrose1960}.
\end{rem}
\subsection{Complex case}\label{sec-Petrov-types-complex}
If the metric is complex with no preferred reality condition imposed on it, the coefficients $( \Phi _0 , \Phi _1 , \Phi _2 , \Phi _3 , \Phi _4 )$ are generically complex, and the polynomial \eqref{eq-Ricci-polynomial} has generically four distinct roots, and thus four distinct principal null structures. Following the notation of \cite{Penrose1986}, we can encode the multiplicities of the roots of \eqref{eq-Ricci-polynomial} in a partition $\{a_1,a_2,a_3,a_4\}$ of the integer $4$, where $a_1+a_2+a_3+a_4=4$. We shall omit those $a_i$ from the partition whenever $a_i=0$. We thus obtain a Petrov classification of $\Phi_{ab}$:
\begin{displaymath}
\begin{array}{c|c|c}
\text{Petrov type} & \{a_1,a_2,a_3,a_4 \} & \Phi _{ABCD} \\
\hline
\text{I} & \{ 1,1,1,1 \} & \alpha_{(A} \beta_{B} \gamma_{C} \delta_{D)} \\
\text{II} & \{ 2,1,1 \} & \alpha_{(A} \alpha_{B} \beta_{C} \gamma_{D)} \\
\text{III} & \{3,1\} & \alpha_{(A} \alpha_{B} \alpha_{C} \beta_{D)} \\
\text{N} & \{4\} & \alpha_{A} \alpha_{B} \alpha_{C} \alpha_{D} \\
\text{D} & \{2,2\} & \alpha_{(A} \alpha_{B} \beta_{C} \beta_{D)}\\
\text{O} & \{ - \} & 0
\end{array}
\end{displaymath}
Petrov types II, II, III and N single out a multiple principal null structure, and Petrov type D a pair of distinct multiple principal null structures.
\begin{rem}\label{rem-typeD}
Suppose $\Phi_{ab}$ is of Petrov type D so that the polynomial \eqref{eq-Ricci-polynomial} has two distinct roots of multiplicity two. Then we can always arrange that these roots are $0$ and $\infty$ in $\CP^1$, which is done by some suitable change of frame \eqref{eq-adapted-modulo} by assuming, with no loss, that one of these roots is $0$. In this case, we have a distinguished frame $(k^a,\ell^a,n^a)$ adapted to \emph{both} multiple principal null structures, namely $k^a$ and $\ell^a$.
\end{rem}
Let $k^a$ be a generator of a null structure $\mcN$. To verify whether $\mcN$ is a (multiple) principal null structure, it suffices to check whether any of the following algebraic relations holds:
\begin{displaymath}
\begin{array}{ccc}
\text{Petrov type I:} & k^a \Phi_{ab} k^b = 0 \, , & \Phi_0 = 0 \, , \\
\text{Petrov type II:} & k_{[a} \Phi_{b]c} k^c = 0 \, , & \Phi_0 = \Phi_1 = 0 \, , \\
\text{Petrov type D:} & k_{[a} \Phi_{b]c} k^c = 0 \quad \mbox{and} \quad \ell_{[a} \Phi_{b]c} \ell^c = 0 \, , & \Phi_0 = \Phi_1 = 0 = \Phi_3 = \Phi_4 \, , \\
\text{Petrov type III:} & k^a \Phi_{ab} = 0 \quad \mbox{or} \quad k_{[a} \Phi_{b][c} k_{d]} = 0 \, , & \Phi_0 = \Phi_1 = \Phi_2 = 0 \, , \\
\text{Petrov type N:} & k_{[a} \Phi_{b]c} = 0 \, , & \Phi_0 = \Phi_1 = \Phi_2 = \Phi_3 = 0 \, ,
\end{array}
\end{displaymath}
where $\ell^a$, in the case of Petrov type D, determines a multiple principal structure distinct from $\mcN$.
Because of the importance of the Goldberg-Sachs theorem, we highlight the algebraically special condition of the tracefree Ricci tensor by means of the following proposition. In particular, the proofs of the various versions of the Goldberg-Sachs theorem in section \ref{sec-GS} will impinge on it.
\begin{prop}
In an adapted frame, the tracefree Ricci tensor is algebraically special if and only if
\begin{align*}
\Phi_0 = \Phi_1 = 0 \, .
\end{align*}
\end{prop}
\subsection{Real case}
\subsubsection{Euclidean signature}\label{sec-Petrov-types-Euc}
In Euclidean signature, the four roots of the polynomial \eqref{eq-Ricci-polynomial} come in two complex conjugate pairs. Thus, we distinguish only two algebraic types: the generic type G, where the conjugate pairs of complex roots are distinct, and the special type D, where the pairs coincide. Notationally, we shall bracket a conjugate pair of complex roots, i.e. $\{1^\C ,\overline{1^\C} \}$, and where the ${}^\C$ indicates that the root is complex.
\begin{displaymath}
\begin{array}{c|c|c}
\text{Petrov type} & \{a_1,a_2,a_3,a_4 \} & \Phi _{ABCD} \\
\hline
\text{G} & \{ \{1^\C ,\overline{1^\C} \}, \{1^\C ,\overline{1^\C} \} \} & \xi_{(A} \hat{\xi}_{B} \eta_{C} \hat{\eta}_{D)}\\
\text{D} & \{ \{1^\C ,\overline{1^\C} \}^2 \} & \xi_{(A} \hat{\xi}_{B} \xi_{C} \hat{\xi}_{D)}\\
\text{O} & \{ - \} & 0
\end{array}
\end{displaymath}
Here, a $\hat{}$ denotes a reality condition on $(\C^2)^*$ defined as follows: if $\xi_A = (\xi_0 , \xi_1)$, then $\hat{\xi}_A = (-\bar{\xi}_1 , \bar{\xi}_0)$.
Since a null structure determines a unit vector $u^a$ (up to sign) and an endomorphism $J \ind{_a^b}$ as described in section \ref{sec-Euc}, we can characterise principal null structures as follows
\begin{displaymath}
\begin{array}{cc}
\text{Petrov type G:} & J \ind{_{(a}^c} \Phi_{b)c} = 0 \quad \mbox{or} \quad 2 u_{[a} \Phi_{b][c} u_{d]} + u_{[a} g_{b][c} u_{d]} u^e u^f \Phi_{ef} = 0 \, , \\
\text{Petrov type D:} & J \ind{_{(a}^c} \Phi_{b)c} = 0 \quad \mbox{and} \quad u_{[a} \Phi_{b]c} u^c = 0 \, .
\end{array}
\end{displaymath}
\begin{rem}
In the context of almost contact metric manifolds (see Remarks \ref{rem-contact-Lor} and \ref{rem-contact-Riem}), the type D condition is equivalent to the manifold being \emph{$\eta$-Einstein}, i.e. the Ricci tensor takes the form $R_{ab} = a \, g_{ab} + b \, u_a u_b$
for some unit vector $u^a$ and functions $a$ and $b$, i.e. $R= 3a -b$ and $\Phi_{ab} = \frac{b}{3} \left( g_{ab} + 3 u_a u_b \right)$.
\end{rem}
\subsubsection{Lorentzian signature}\label{sec-Petrov-types-Lor}
In Lorentzian signature, the situation is a little more complex, and one distinguishes ten Petrov types including type O. Here, a root of \eqref{eq-Ricci-polynomial} can either be real or complex. We distinguish the following cases, excluding type O:
\begin{itemize}
\item If all roots are real, we obtain a totally real analogue of the complex Petrov types with five Petrov types denoted G$_r$, II$_r$, III$_r$, N$_r$ and D$_r$. Petrov types II$_r$, III$_r$ and N$_r$ single out a multiple principal null structure of real index $1$, and Petrov type D$_r$ a pair of distinct multiple principal null structures of real index $1$.
\item If all the roots are complex, they come in conjugate pairs, and we have two Petrov types, G and D as in the Euclidean case. Petrov type D singles out a complex conjugate pair of multiple principal null structures of real index $0$.
\item The remaining types, denoted SG and II, occur when $\Phi(z)$ has two real roots and one conjugate pair of complex roots. Petrov Type II singles out a multiple principal null structure of real index $1$.
\end{itemize}
Using the same notation as above to describe the degeneracy and reality of the roots of \eqref{eq-Ricci-polynomial}, we obtain the following Petrov types of $\Phi_{ab}$:
\begin{displaymath}
\begin{array}{c|c|c}
\text{Petrov type} & \{a_1,a_2,a_3,a_4 \} & \Phi _{ABCD} \\
\hline
\text{G} & \{ \{ 1^\C ,\overline{1^\C} \}, \{ 1^\C ,\overline{1^\C} \} \} & \xi_{(A} \hat{\xi}_{B} \eta_{C} \hat{\eta}_{D)} \\
\text{SG} & \{ 1,1,\{ 1^\C ,\overline{1^\C} \} \} & \alpha_{(A} \beta_{B} \eta_{C} \hat{\eta}_{D)}\\
\text{II} & \{ 2, \{ 1^\C ,\overline{1^\C} \} \} & \alpha_{(A} \alpha_{B} \eta_{C} \hat{\eta}_{D)}\\
\text{D} & \{ \{ 1^\C ,\overline{1^\C})^2 \} & \xi_{(A} \hat{\xi}_{B} \eta_{C} \hat{\eta}_{D)}\\
\text{G$_r$} & \{ 1,1,1,1 \} & \alpha_{(A} \beta_{B} \gamma_{C} \delta_{D)} \\
\text{II$_r$} & \{ 2,1,1 \} & \alpha_{(A} \alpha_{B} \beta_{C} \gamma_{D)} \\
\text{III$_r$} & \{ 3,1 \} & \alpha_{(A} \alpha_{B} \alpha_{C} \beta_{D)} \\
\text{N$_r$} & \{ 4 \} & \alpha_{A} \alpha_{B} \alpha_{C} \alpha_{D} \\
\text{D$_r$} & \{ 2,2 \} & \alpha_{(A} \alpha_{B} \beta_{C} \beta_{D)}\\
\text{O} & \{ - \} & 0
\end{array}
\end{displaymath}
Characterisation of the Petrov types in terms of their principal null structures can be done as in the previous cases in the obvious way.
\section{Curvature conditions}\label{sec-curvature-cond}
Before we move to our main results on the Goldberg-Sachs theorem, we remark that in three dimensions, unlike in higher dimensions \cite{Taghavi-Chabert2013}, the conformally invariant condition
\begin{align*}
[ \Gamma ( \mcN^\perp ) , \Gamma ( \mcN^\perp ) ] \subset \Gamma ( \mcN^\perp ) \, ,
\end{align*}
for a null structure $\mcN$, imposes no constraint on the curvature. Non-trivial constraints on the Ricci curvature are expected to arise from non-conformally invariant conditions on $\mcN$ \cite{Taghavi-Chabert2013}. In particular, we have the following proposition.
\begin{prop}\label{prop-integrability-cond}
Let $\mcN$ be a null structure on an oriented three-dimensional (pseudo-)Riemannian manifold $(\mcM,\bm{g})$.
\begin{itemize}
\item Suppose that $\mcN$ is co-geodetic. Then $\mcN$ is a principal null structure, i.e.
\begin{align}\label{eq-integrability-cond}
k^a k^b \Phi_{ab} & = 0 \, ,
\end{align}
for any generator $k^a$ of $\mcN$.
\item Suppose $\mcN$ is parallel. Then $\Phi_{ab}$ is algebraically special, i.e.
\begin{align}\label{eq-integrability-cond-parallel}
k^c \Phi_{c[a} k_{b]} & = 0 \, .
\end{align}
for any generator $k^a$ of $\mcN$.
\end{itemize}
\end{prop}
\begin{proof}
We use the Newman-Penrose formalism of appendix \ref{sec-NP} adapted to $\mcN$.
\begin{itemize}
\item By assumption, $\kappa = \rho = 0$. Then, by equation \eqref{Ricci000100}, we have $\Phi _0 = 0$.
\item By assumption, $\kappa = \rho = \tau = 0$. Then, \eqref{Ricci001100}, \eqref{Ricci000100} and \eqref{Ricci110100} give $\Phi _1 = 0$, $\Phi _0 = 0$ and $\Phi _2 = S$ respectively.
\end{itemize}
This completes the proof.
\end{proof}
\begin{rem}
In anticipation of the Goldberg-Sachs theorem, which will be concerned with the relation between algebraically special tracefree Ricci tensors and co-geodetic null structures, the above proposition tells that the existence of a co-geodetic null structure $\mcN$ already imposes algebraic constraints relating the curvature and $\mcN$.
\end{rem}
\section{Main results}\label{sec-GS}
Throughout this section, $(\mcM,\bm{g})$ will denote an oriented three-dimensional (pseudo-)Riemannian manifold. As before, the tracefree Ricci tensor will be denoted by $\Phi_{ab}$ and the Ricci scalar by $R$, and its scalar multiple $S := \frac{1}{12} R$. We also recall the definitions of the Cotton tensor and its Hodge dual:
\begin{align*}
A_{a b c} & := 2 \, \nabla_{[b} \Rho _{c] a} = - 2 \, \nabla_{[b} \Phi_{c]a} + 2 g_{a[b} \, \nabla_{c]} S \, , &
(*A)_{ab} & := \frac{1}{2} e \ind{_b^{cd}} A \ind{_{acd}} = - e \ind{_{(a|}^{cd}} \nabla_{c} \Phi _{d |b)} \, .
\end{align*}
In particular, the components of $A_{abc}$ with respect to the frame $(k^a, \ell^a, n^a)$ will be denoted
\begin{align}
\begin{aligned}\label{eq-A-components}
A_0 & := 2 \, A _{abc} k^a k^b n^c \, , &
A_1 & := A _{abc} k^a k^b \ell^c \, , &
A_2 & := 2 \, A _{abc} k^a n^b \ell^c \, , \\
A_3 & := A _{abc} \ell^a k^b \ell^c \, , &
A_4 & := 2 \, A _{abc} \ell^a n^b \ell^c \, .
\end{aligned}
\end{align}
The results of sections \ref{sec-obst}, \ref{sec-algsp-co-geo} and \ref{sec-co-geo-algsp} will be stated for an arbitrary complex-valued metric with no reality conditions imposed.
\subsection{Obstructions to the existence of multiple co-geodetic null structures}\label{sec-obst}
We first present results concerning curvature obstructions to the existence of multiple co-geodetic null structures.
\begin{prop}\label{prop-obstruction-GS}
Let $\mcN$ be a null structure on $(\mcM,\bm{g})$, and let $k^a$ be any generator of $\mcN$. Suppose that $\mcN$ is co-geodetic and multiple principal.
\begin{itemize}
\item If $\Phi_{ab}$ is of Petrov type II, then
\begin{align}\label{eq-obstruction-II}
k^a k^b \left( A_{abc} + 3 \, g_{bc} \nabla_a S \right) & = 0 \, .
\end{align}
\item If $\Phi_{ab}$ is of Petrov type III, then
\begin{align}\label{eq-obstruction-III}
k^a \left( A_{abc} - 2 \, g_{a[b} \nabla_{c]} S \right) & = 0 \, , & k^a k^b A_{abc} & = 0 \, , & k^a \nabla_a S & = 0 \, .
\end{align}
\item If $\Phi_{ab}$ is of Petrov type N, then
\begin{align}\label{eq-obstruction-N}
k^c \left( A_{abc} - g_{ca} \nabla_b S \right) & = 0 \, , & k^a A_{abc} & = 0 \, , & k_{[a} \nabla_{b]} S & = 0 \, .
\end{align}
\end{itemize}
\end{prop}
\begin{proof}
With reference to the Newman-Penrose formalism, and in a frame adapted to $\mcN$, we first note that
\begin{align*}
\mbox{Condition \eqref{eq-obstruction-II}} & & \Longleftrightarrow & & \left\{
\begin{aligned}
A _0 \equiv 0 \, , \\
A _1 + 3 \, D S \equiv 0 \, ,
\end{aligned} \right. \\
\mbox{Condition \eqref{eq-obstruction-III}} & & \Longleftrightarrow & & \left\{
\begin{aligned}
A _0 = A _1 \equiv 0 \, , \qquad D S = 0 \\
A _2 + 2 \, \delta S \equiv 0 \, .
\end{aligned} \right. \\
\mbox{Condition \eqref{eq-obstruction-N}} & & \Longleftrightarrow & & \left\{
\begin{aligned}
A _0 = A _1 = A_2 \equiv 0 \, , \qquad D S = \delta S = 0 \\
A _3 + \Delta S \equiv 0 \, .
\end{aligned} \right.
\end{align*}
The assumption that $\mcN$ is co-geodetic is simply $\kappa \equiv 0$ and $\rho \equiv 0$. We now deal with each case separately, referring to the Newman-Penrose equations given in Appendix \ref{sec-NP}.
\begin{itemize}
\item Assuming the type II condition, i.e. $\Phi _0 = \Phi _1 \equiv 0$, we have
\begin{align*}
\eqref{Cotton0000} : & & A _0 & \equiv 0 \, , \\
3 \times \eqref{Bianchi00} + \eqref{Cotton0001} : & & A _1 + 3 \, D S & \equiv 0 \, .
\end{align*}
\item Assuming the type III condition, i.e. $\Phi _0 = \Phi _1 = \Phi _2 \equiv 0$, we have
\begin{align*}
\eqref{Bianchi00} : & & D S & = 0 \, , \\
\eqref{Cotton0000} : & & A _0 & = 0 \, , \\
\eqref{Cotton0001} : & & A _1 & = 0 \, , \\
2 \times \eqref{Bianchi01} + \eqref{Cotton0011} : & & A _2 + 2 \, \delta S & \equiv 0 \, .
\end{align*}
\item Assuming the type N condition, i.e. $\Phi _0 = \Phi _1 = \Phi _2 = \Phi _3 \equiv 0$, we have
\begin{align*}
\eqref{Bianchi00} : & & D S & = 0 \, , \\
\eqref{Bianchi01} : & & \delta S & = 0 \, , \\
\eqref{Cotton0000} : & & A _0 & = 0 \, , \\
\eqref{Cotton0001} : & & A _1 & = 0 \, , \\
\eqref{Cotton0011} : & & A _2 & = 0 \, , \\
\eqref{Bianchi11} + \eqref{Cotton0111} : & & A _3 + \Delta S & \equiv 0 \, .
\end{align*}
\end{itemize}
Comparison with the frame components \eqref{eq-A-components} completes the proof.
\end{proof}
\begin{rem}
Proposition \ref{prop-obstruction-GS} also applies to tracefree Ricci tensors of Petrov type D, in which case one has a pair of distinct multiple principal null structures as described in Remark \ref{rem-typeD}.
\end{rem}
\subsection{Algebraic speciality implies co-geodetic null structures}\label{sec-algsp-co-geo}
We are now in the position of formulating the Goldberg-Sachs theorems (Theorems \ref{thm-GS-II-gen}, \ref{thm-GS-III-gen} and \ref{thm-GS-N-gen}), along lines similar to Kundt \& Thompson \cite{Kundt1962} and Robinson \& Schild \cite{Robinson1963}. Note however that unlike the versions of these authors, the following theorems are \emph{not} conformally invariant.
\begin{thm}[Petrov type II]\label{thm-GS-II-gen}
Let $\mcN$ be a multiple principal null structure on $(\mcM,\bm{g})$. Assume that $\Phi_{ab}$ is of Petrov type II and does not degenerate further. Suppose further that, for any generator $k^a$ of $\mcN$,
\begin{align}\tag{\ref{eq-obstruction-II}}
k^a k^b \left( A_{abc} + 3 \, g_{bc} \nabla_a S \right) & = 0 \, .
\end{align}
Then $\mcN$ is co-geodetic.
\end{thm}
\begin{proof}
Assume that $\Phi_{ab}$ is of Petrov type II, i.e. $\Phi _0 = \Phi _1 = 0$ in an adapted frame. In this case, the Newman-Penrose equations give
\begin{align*}
\eqref{Cotton0000} : & & A _0 & = - 12 \, \kappa \Phi _2 \, , \\
3 \times \eqref{Bianchi00} + \eqref{Cotton0001} : & & A _1 + 3 D S & =
- 12 \, \rho \Phi _2
\, .
\end{align*}
The assumption \eqref{eq-obstruction-II} in an adapted frame tells us that the LHS of the above set of equations are precisely zero. Now, since $\Phi_{ab}$ does not degenerate further, $\Phi _2 \neq 0$, so we conclude $\kappa \equiv 0$ and $\rho \equiv 0$.
\end{proof}
\begin{thm}[Petrov type III]\label{thm-GS-III-gen}
Let $\mcN$ be a multiple principal null structure on $(\mcM,\bm{g})$. Assume that $\Phi_{ab}$ is of Petrov type III and does not degenerate further. Suppose further that, for any generator $k^a$ of $\mcN$,
\begin{align}\tag{\ref{eq-obstruction-III}}
k^a \left( A_{abc} - 2 \, g_{a[b} \nabla_{c]} S \right) & = 0 \, , & k^a k^b A_{abc} & = 0 \, , & k^a \nabla_a S & = 0 \, ,
\end{align}
Then $\mcN$ is co-geodetic.
\end{thm}
\begin{proof}
Assume that $\Phi_{ab}$ is of Petrov type III, i.e. $\Phi _0 = \Phi _1 = \Phi_2 = 0$ in an adapted frame. In this case, the Newman-Penrose equations give
\begin{align*}
\eqref{Bianchi00} : & & D S & = 2 \, \kappa \Phi _3
\, , \\
\eqref{Cotton0000} : & & A _0 & = 0
\, , \\
\eqref{Cotton0001} : & & A _1 & =
- 6 \, \kappa \Phi _3 \, , \\
2\times\eqref{Bianchi01}+\eqref{Cotton0011} : & & A _2 + 2 \, \delta S & = - 8 \, \rho \Phi _3
\, .
\end{align*}
The assumption \eqref{eq-obstruction-III} in an adapted frame tells us that the LHS of the above set of equations are precisely zero. Now, since $\Phi_{ab}$ does not degenerate further, $\Phi _3 \neq 0$, so we conclude $\kappa \equiv 0$ and $\rho \equiv 0$.
\end{proof}
\begin{thm}[Petrov type N]\label{thm-GS-N-gen}
Let $\mcN$ be a multiple principal null structure on $(\mcM,\bm{g})$. Assume that $\Phi_{ab}$ is of Petrov type N and does not degenerate further. Suppose further that, for any generator $k^a$ of $\mcN$,
\begin{align}\tag{\ref{eq-obstruction-N}}
k^c \left( A_{abc} - g_{ca} \nabla_b S \right) & = 0 \, , & k^a A_{abc} & = 0 \, , & k_{[a} \nabla_{b]} S & = 0 \, ,
\end{align}
Then $\mcN$ is co-geodetic.
\end{thm}
\begin{proof}
Assume that $\Phi_{ab}$ is of Petrov type N, i.e. $\Phi _0 = \Phi _1 = \Phi_2 = \Phi_3 = 0$ in an adapted frame. In this case, the Newman-Penrose equations give
\begin{align*}
\eqref{Bianchi00} : & & D S & = 0
\, , \\
\eqref{Bianchi01} : & & \delta S & = \kappa \Phi _4
\, , \\
\eqref{Cotton0000} : & & A _0 & = 0
\, , \\
\eqref{Cotton0001} : & & A _1 & = 0 \, , \\
\eqref{Cotton0011} : & & A _2 & = - 2 \, \kappa \Phi _4
\, , \\
\eqref{Bianchi11} + \eqref{Cotton0111} :
& & \Delta S + A _3 & = - 4 \, \rho \Phi _4 \, .
\end{align*}
The assumption \eqref{eq-obstruction-N} in an adapted frame tells us that the LHS of the above set of equations are precisely zero. Now, since $\Phi_{ab}$ does not degenerate further, $\Phi _4 \neq 0$, so we conclude $\kappa \equiv 0$ and $\rho \equiv 0$.
\end{proof}
\begin{thm}[Petrov type D]\label{thm-GS-D-gen}
Assume that $\Phi_{ab}$ is of Petrov type D with multiple principal null structures $\mcN$ and $\mcN'$ on $(\mcM,\bm{g})$, and does not degenerate further. Let $k^a$ and $\ell^a$ be any generators of $\mcN$ and $\mcN'$ respectively, and suppose further that
\begin{align}\label{eq-obstruction-D}
k^a k^b \left( A_{abc} + 3 \, g_{bc} \nabla_a S \right) & = 0 \, , & \ell^a \ell^b \left( A_{abc} + 3 \, g_{bc} \nabla_a S \right) & = 0 \, .
\end{align}
Then both $\mcN$ and $\mcN'$ are co-geodetic.
\end{thm}
\begin{proof}
Assume that $\Phi_{ab}$ is of Petrov type D, i.e. $\Phi _0 = \Phi _1 = 0 = \Phi_3 = \Phi_4$ in a frame adapted to both $\mcN$ and $\mcN'$ as explained in Remark \ref{rem-typeD}. In this case, we see that the additional constraints $\Phi_3 = \Phi_4 =0$ do not affect any of the argument of the proof of Theorem \ref{thm-GS-D-gen}, which impinges on the condition $\Phi_2 \neq 0$, and we can conclude $\mcN$ is geodetic.
To show that $\mcN'$ is integrable, we have to show that in an adapted frame, and with reference to the covariant derivative \eqref{eq-nablal} of $\ell^a$, the Newman-Penrose coefficients $\mu$ and $\nu$ should also be zero. But the Newman-Penrose equations give
\begin{align*}
\eqref{Cotton1111}: & & A _4 & = - 12 \, \nu \Phi _2 \, , \\
3 \times \eqref{Bianchi11} - \eqref{Cotton0111}: & & A _3 - 3 \Delta S & = - 12 \, \mu \Phi _2 \, .
\end{align*}
The assumption \eqref{eq-obstruction-D} in an adapted frame tells us that the LHS of the above set of equations are precisely zero. Now, since $\Phi_{ab}$ does not degenerate further, $\Phi _2 \neq 0$, so we conclude $\kappa \equiv 0$ and $\rho \equiv 0$.
\end{proof}
\subsection{Co-geodetic null structures implies algebraic speciality}\label{sec-co-geo-algsp}
We now state and prove the converse to Theorems \ref{thm-GS-II-gen}, \ref{thm-GS-III-gen} and \ref{thm-GS-N-gen}.
\begin{thm}\label{thm-GS-hard}
Let $\mcN$ be a co-geodetic null structure on $(\mcM,\bm{g})$. Suppose that, for any generator $k^a$ of $\mcN$,
\begin{align}\tag{\ref{eq-obstruction-II}}
k^a k^b \left( A_{abc} + 3 \, g_{bc} \nabla_a S \right) & = 0 \, .
\end{align}
Then $\Phi_{ab}$ is algebraically special with $\mcN$ as multiple principal null structure.
\end{thm}
\begin{proof}
As always we work in an adapted frame and use the Newman-Penrose formalism, in which $\kappa = \rho \equiv 0$ means that $\mcN$ is co-geodetic. Then, assuming $\kappa = \rho \equiv 0$, we know by Proposition \ref{prop-integrability-cond} that $\Phi _0 \equiv 0$. In this case, we have the following components of the Bianchi identity
\begin{align}
D \Phi _2 - 2 \, \delta \Phi _1 - D S & = \left( 2 \, \pi - 4 \, \tau - 4 \, \alpha \right) \Phi _1
\, , \tag{\ref{Bianchi00}}
\end{align}
and of the Cotton tensor
\begin{align}
- 4 \, D \Phi _1 & = A _0
- 8 \, \epsilon \Phi _1 \, , \tag{\ref{Cotton0000}} \\
2 \, \delta \Phi _1 - 3 D \Phi _2 & = A _1
+ \left( 4 \, \alpha - 4 \, \tau - 6 \, \pi \right) \Phi _1
\, , \tag{\ref{Cotton0001}}
\end{align}
We proceed by steps:
\begin{itemize}
\item first, computing $3 \times \eqref{Bianchi00} + \eqref{Cotton0001}$ yields
\begin{align}\label{eq-step1}
- 4 \delta \Phi _1 & = \left( A _1 + 3 \, D S \right) - 8 \left( 2 \tau + \alpha \right) \Phi _1 \, ;
\end{align}
\item then $\delta \eqref{Cotton0000} - D \eqref{eq-step1}$ gives
\begin{align}\label{eq-step2}
4 \, [ D , \delta ] \Phi _1 & = \delta \, A _0 - D \left( A _1 + 3 D \, S \right) - 8 \left( \delta \epsilon - D \alpha - 2\, D \tau \right) \Phi _1 - 8 \, \epsilon \, \delta \Phi _1 + 8 \, \left( \alpha +2 \tau \right) D \Phi _1 \, ;
\end{align}
\item at this stage, we can substitute the commutation relation
\begin{align}
[ D , \delta ] & = \left( \pi - 2 \, \alpha \right) D \, , \tag{\ref{commutator0001}}
\end{align}
into the LHS of \eqref{eq-step2}, and the following components of the Ricci identity
\begin{align}
D \tau & =
- 2 \, \Phi _1 \, , \tag{\ref{Ricci001100}} \\
D \alpha - \delta \epsilon & =
- 2 \, \epsilon \alpha
+ \pi \epsilon
- \Phi _1 \, , \tag{\ref{Ricci000101}}
\end{align}
together with \eqref{eq-step1} and \eqref{Cotton0000} into the RHS of \eqref{eq-step2}, to get
\begin{multline}\label{eq-step3}
4 \, \left( \pi - 2 \, \alpha \right) D \Phi _1 = \delta \, A _0 - D \left( A _1 + 3 D \, S \right) + 2 \, \epsilon \, \left( A _1 + 3 \, D S \right) - 2 \, \left( \alpha +2 \tau \right) A _0 \\
- 8 \left( 2 \, \epsilon \alpha - \pi \epsilon + 5 \, \Phi _1 \right) \Phi _1 \cancel{ - 16 \, \epsilon \, \left( 2 \tau + \alpha \right) \Phi _1 + 16 \, \left( \alpha +2 \tau \right) \epsilon \Phi _1 } \, ;
\end{multline}
\item subsituting \eqref{Cotton0000} into the RHS of \eqref{eq-step3} and expanding yields
\begin{align}\label{eq-step4}
40 \left( \Phi _1 \right)^2 & = \delta \, A _0 - D \left( A _1 + 3 D \, S \right) + 2 \, \epsilon \, \left( A _1 + 3 \, D S \right) + \left( \pi - 4 \tau - 4 \alpha \right) A _0 \, ;
\end{align}
\item finally, by condition \eqref{eq-obstruction-II}, the RHS of \eqref{eq-step4} vanishes identically and we conclude $\Phi _1 \equiv 0$.
\end{itemize}
In summary, $\kappa = \rho \equiv 0$ implies $\Phi _0 = \Phi _1 \equiv 0$, i.e. co-geodetic $\mcN$ implies algebraic speciality of $\Phi_{ab}$ with $\mcN$ multiple principal null structure.
\end{proof}
\subsection{Topological massive gravity}\label{sec-GS-TMG}
Next, we consider the equations governing topological massive gravity. These are none other than Einstein's equations with cosmological constant $\Lambda$ in which the energy-momentum tensor is proportional to the Hodge-dual of the Cotton tensor, i.e.
\begin{align}\label{eq-TMG1}
R_{ab} - \frac{1}{2} R \, g_{ab} + \Lambda \, g_{ab} & = \frac{1}{m} (*A)_{ab} \, .
\end{align}
Here, $m \neq 0$ is a parameter of topological massive gravity theory.
Substituting the expression for the tracefree Ricci tensor and tracing yield the expressions
\begin{align}
\Phi_{ab} & = \frac{1}{m} (*A)_{ab} \, , \label{eq-TMG2a} \\
R & = 6 \, \Lambda = \mbox{constant} \, , \label{eq-TMG2b}
\end{align}
equivalent to \eqref{eq-TMG1}.
\begin{rem}
It is in fact sufficient to consider only \eqref{eq-TMG2a} since \eqref{eq-TMG2b} follows from it. To see this, we note that $\nabla^a (*A)_{ab} = 0$ which follows from \eqref{eq-divCotton}. So, by \eqref{eq-TMG2a}, $\nabla^a \Phi_{ab} = 0$. Now, the Bianchi identity \eqref{eq-Bianchi-contracted} gives $\nabla_a R = 0$, i.e. \eqref{eq-TMG2b}.
\end{rem}
In an adapted frame, and with reference to \eqref{eq-NP-Cotton}, equations \eqref{eq-TMG2a} read as
\begin{align}\label{eq-TMG2a-comp}
\Phi_0 & = -\frac{\ii^q}{2\sqrt{2}m} A_0 \, , & \Phi_1 & = -\frac{\ii^q}{2\sqrt{2}m} A_1 \, , & \Phi_2 & = -\frac{\ii^q}{2\sqrt{2}m} A_2 \, , & \Phi_3 & = -\frac{\ii^q}{2\sqrt{2}m} A_3 \, , & \Phi_4 & = -\frac{\ii^q}{2\sqrt{2}m} A_4 \, ,
\end{align}
where $q=0$ in Euclidean signature, and $q=1$ in Lorentzian signature.
\begin{lem}
Suppose $(\mcM,\bm{g})$ is a solution of the topological massive gravity equations \eqref{eq-TMG2a} and \eqref{eq-TMG2b}.
\begin{itemize}
\item If the tracefree Ricci tensor is of Petrov type $II$, then
\begin{align*}\tag{\ref{eq-obstruction-II}}
k^a k^b \left( A_{abc} + 3 \, g_{bc} \nabla_a S \right) & = 0 \, .
\end{align*}
\item If the tracefree Ricci tensor is of Petrov type $III$, then
\begin{align*}\tag{\ref{eq-obstruction-III}}
k^a \left( A_{abc} - 2 \, g_{a[b} \nabla_{c]} S \right) & = 0 \, , & k^a k^b A_{abc} & = 0 \, , & k^a \nabla_a S & = 0 \, .
\end{align*}
\item If the tracefree Ricci tensor is of Petrov type $N$, then
\begin{align*}\tag{\ref{eq-obstruction-N}}
k^c \left( A_{abc} - g_{ca} \nabla_b S \right) & = 0 \, , & k^a A_{abc} & = 0 \, , & k_{[a} \nabla_{b]} S & = 0 \, .
\end{align*}
\end{itemize}
\end{lem}
\begin{proof}
We first note that $S=\frac{1}{2}\Lambda$ is constant by virtue of the topological massive gravity equations \eqref{eq-TMG2b}. Consequently, equations \eqref{eq-obstruction-II}, \eqref{eq-obstruction-III} and \eqref{eq-obstruction-N}, which we need to assert, are reduced to algebraic conditions on the Cotton tensor. More precisely, with respect to an adapted frame, we must now show that
\begin{align*}
\mbox{Petrov type II:} \qquad \Phi_0 = \Phi_1 & \equiv 0 & & \Rightarrow & A_0 = A_1 & = 0 \, , \\
\mbox{Petrov type III:} \qquad \Phi_0 = \Phi_1 = \Phi_2 & \equiv 0 & & \Rightarrow & A_0 = A_1 = A_2 & = 0 \, , \\
\mbox{Petrov type N:} \qquad \Phi_0 = \Phi_1 = \Phi_2 = \Phi_3 & \equiv 0 & & \Rightarrow & A_0 = A_1 = A_2 = A_3 & = 0 \, .
\end{align*}
But the veracity of these statements follows from the topological massive gravity equations \eqref{eq-TMG2a}, which are \eqref{eq-TMG2a-comp} in an adapted frame.
\end{proof}
Combining Theorems \ref{thm-GS-II-gen}, \ref{thm-GS-III-gen}, \ref{thm-GS-N-gen}, \ref{thm-GS-D-gen} and \ref{thm-GS-hard} leads to our main result.
\begin{thm}\label{thm-GS-TMG}
Let $(\mcM, \bm{g})$ be an oriented three-dimensional (pseudo-)Riemannian manifold that is a solution of the topological massive gravity equations, and assume that the Petrov type of the tracefree Ricci tensor $\Phi_{ab}$ does not change in an open subset of $\mcM$. Then $\Phi_{ab}$ is algebraically special if and only if $(\mcM, \bm{g})$ admits a co-geodetic null structure.
\end{thm}
\subsection{Real versions}
All the theorems given in sections \ref{sec-obst}, \ref{sec-algsp-co-geo}, \ref{sec-co-geo-algsp} and \ref{sec-GS-TMG} can easily be adapted to the case where the metric is real-valued. The crucial points here are that
\begin{itemize}
\item each of the algebraically special Petrov types of the tracefree Ricci tensor, as given in sections \ref{sec-Petrov-types-Euc} and \ref{sec-Petrov-types-Lor}, singles out multiple principal null structure of a particular real index, and
\item the real index $r$ of this null structure yields a particular \emph{real} geometric interpretation as given in section \ref{sec-real-metrics}, i.e. a congruence of null curves when $r=1$, or a congruence of timelike curves when $r=0$.
\end{itemize}
We shall only give real versions of Theorem \ref{thm-GS-TMG} in the context of the topological massive gravity equations.
\begin{thm}[Lorentzian Goldberg-Sachs theorem for Topological Massive Gravity]\label{thm-Lor-GS-TMG}
Let $(\mcM,\bm{g})$ be an oriented three-dimensional Lorentzian manifold that is a solution of the topological massive gravity equations. Then
\begin{itemize}
\item $(\mcM,\bm{g})$ admits a divergence-free congruence of null geodesics (i.e. is a Kundt spacetime) if and only if its tracefree Ricci tensor is of Petrov type II, II${}_r$, D${}_r$, III${}_r$ or N${}_r$;
\item $(\mcM,\bm{g})$ admits two distinct divergence-free congruences of null geodesics if and only if its tracefree Ricci tensor is of Petrov type D${}_r$;
\item $(\mcM,\bm{g})$ admits a shear-free congruence of timelike geodesics if and only if its tracefree Ricci tensor is of Petrov type D.
\end{itemize}
\end{thm}
In fact, parts of Theorem \ref{thm-Lor-GS-TMG} were proved in reference in \cite{Chow2010}: namely, that every Kundt spacetime that is solution of the topological massive gravity equations must be algebraically special. By Theorem \ref{thm-Lor-GS-TMG}, this exhausts all solutions of Petrov types II, II${}_r$, D${}_r$, III${}_r$ or N${}_r$. All Petrov type D solutions of the topological massive gravity equations are also given in reference \cite{Chow2010a}. Therefore, Theorem \ref{thm-Lor-GS-TMG} tells us that these are the only possible algebraically special solutions of the topological massive gravity equations.
For the sake of completeness, we state the Riemannian version of Theorem \ref{thm-Riem-GS-TMG}.
\begin{thm}[Riemannian Goldberg-Sachs theorem for Topological Massive Gravity]\label{thm-Riem-GS-TMG}
Let $(\mcM,\bm{g})$ be an oriented three-dimensional Riemannian manifold that is a solution of the topological massive gravity equations. Then $(\mcM,\bm{g})$ admits a shear-free congruence of geodesics if and only if its tracefree Ricci tensor is algebraically special, i.e. of Petrov type D.
\end{thm}
|
\section{Introduction}
\vskip 1cm
Archimedes found some interesting area properties of parabolas.
Consider the region bounded by a parabola and a chord $AB$.
Let $P$ be the point on the parabola where the tangent is parallel to the chord $AB$.
The parallel line through $P$ to the axis of the parabola meets the chord $AB$ at a point
$V$.
Then, he proved that the area of the parabolic region is $4/3$ times
the area of triangle $\bigtriangleup ABP$ whose base is the chord and the third vertex is $P$.
Furthermore, he showed that the center $G$ of gravity of the parabolic section
lies on the segment $PV$ called the axis of the parabolic section with $PG=\frac{3}{5}PV$.
For the proofs of Archimedes, see Chapter 7 of \cite{st}.
\vskip 0.3cm
Very recently, two of the present authors showed that among strictly convex plane curves,
the above area properties of parabolic sections characterize
parabolas. More precisely, they proved as follows (\cite{kk4}).
\vskip 0.3cm
\noindent {\bf Proposition 1.}
Let $X$ be a strictly convex curve in the plane
${\mathbb R}^{2}$. Then $X$ is a parabola if and only if it satisfies
\vskip 0.3cm
\noindent $(C):$
For a point $P$ on $X$ and a chord $AB$ of $X$ parallel to the tangent of $X$ at $P$,
the area of the region bounded by the curve and $AB$ is $4/3$ times
the area of triangle $\bigtriangleup ABP$.
\vskip 0.3cm
Actually, in \cite{kk4}, they
established five characterizations of parabolas, which are the converses of
well-known properties of parabolas originally due to Archimedes
(\cite{st}). In \cite{ks}, the first author and K.-C. Shim gave a characterization of parabolas
using area of triangles associated with a plane curve, which is a generalization of some results in \cite{kr}.
See also \cite{KKKP} for some generalizations of results in \cite{ks}.
In \cite{kk2} and \cite{kk3}, two of the present authors
proved the higher dimensional analogues of some results in \cite{kk4}.
\vskip 0.30cm
For some characterizations of parabolas or conic sections by properties of tangent lines, see
\cite{kka} and \cite{kkpj}. In \cite{kk1}, using curvature function $\kappa$ and support function $h$
of a plane curve,
the first and second authors of the present paper gave a
characterization of ellipses and hyperbolas centered at the origin.
Among the graphs of functions,
B. Richmond and T. Richmond established a dozen characterizations of parabolas
using elementary techniques (\cite{r}). In their paper, parabola means the graph of a quadratic polynomial in one
variable.
\vskip 0.30cm
In this paper, we study strictly locally convex plane curves satisfying the above mentioned
properties on the center of gravity.
Recall that a regular plane curve $X:I\rightarrow {\mathbb R}^{2}$ in the plane
${\mathbb R}^{2}$, where $I$ is an open interval, is called {\it convex} if, for all $s\in I$
the trace $X(I)$ of $X$ lies entirely on one side of the closed
half-plane determined by the tangent line at $s$ (\cite{d}).
A regular plane curve $X:I\rightarrow {\mathbb R}^{2}$ is called {\it locally convex} if, for each $s\in I$
there exists an open subinterval $J\subset I$ containing $s$ such that the curve $X|_J$ restricted to $J$
is a convex curve.
Hereafter, we will say that a locally convex curve $X$ in the plane
${\mathbb R}^{2}$ is {\it strictly locally convex} if the curve is smooth
(that is, of class $C^{(3)}$) and is of positive curvature $\kappa$
with respect to the unit normal $N$ pointing to the convex side.
Hence, in this case we have $\kappa(s)=\left< X''(s), N(X(s))\right> >0$,
where $X(s)$ is an arc-length parametrization of $X$.
For a smooth function $f:I\rightarrow {\mathbb R}$ defined on an open interval,
we will also say that $f$ is
{\it strictly convex} if the graph of $f$ has positive curvature $\kappa$
with respect to the upward unit normal $N$. This condition is equivalent to the positivity of $f''(x)$ on $I$.
\vskip 0.3cm
First of all, in Section 2 we prove the following:
\vskip 0.3cm
\noindent {\bf Theorem 2.}
Let $X$ be a strictly locally convex plane curve in the plane
${\mathbb R}^{2}$. For a fixed point $P$ on $X$ and a sufficiently small $h>0$,
we denote by $l$ the parallel line through $P+hN(P)$ to the tangent $t$ of the curve $X$ at $P$.
If we let $d_P(h)$ the distance from the center $G$ of gravity of the section of $X$ cut off by $l$
to the tangent $t$ of the curve $X$ at $P$, then we have
\begin{equation}\tag{1.1}
\begin{aligned}
\lim _{h\rightarrow 0}\frac{d_P(h)}{h}=\frac{3}{5}.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
\vskip 0.3cm
Without the help of Proposition 1, in Section 3
we prove the following characterization theorem for parabolas with axis parallel to the $y$-axis,
that is, the graph of a quadratic function.
\vskip 0.3cm
\noindent {\bf Theorem 3.}
Let $X$ be the graph of a strictly convex function $g:I\rightarrow {\mathbb R}$ in the $uv$-plane
${\mathbb R}^{2}$ with the upward unit normal $N$.
For a fixed point $P=(u,g(u))$ on $X$ and a sufficiently small $h>0$,
we denote by $l$ (resp., $V$) the parallel line through $P+hN(P)$ to the tangent $t$ of the curve $X$ at $P$
(resp., the point where the parallel line through $P$ to the $v$-axis meets $l$).
Then $X$ is an open part of a parabola with axis parallel to the $v$-axis if and only if
it satisfies
\vskip 0.3cm
\noindent $(D):$ For a fixed point $P$ on $X$ and a sufficiently small $h>0$,
the center $G$ of gravity of the section of $X$ cut off by $l$ lies on the segment $PV$ with
\begin{equation}\tag{1.2}
\begin{aligned}
PG=\frac{3}{5}PV,
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
where we denote by $PV$ both of the segment and its length.
\vskip 0.3cm
Note that if $X$ is an open part of a parabola with axis which is not parallel to the $v$-axis
(for example, the graph of $g$ given in (3.23) with $\alpha\ne 0$), then it does not satisfy Condition $(D)$.
\vskip 0.3cm
Finally using Proposition 1, in Section 4 we prove the following characterization theorem for parabolas.
\vskip 0.3cm
\noindent {\bf Theorem 4.}
Let $X$ be a strictly locally convex plane curve in the plane
${\mathbb R}^{2}$. For a fixed point $P$ on $X$ and a sufficiently small $h>0$,
we denote by $l$ the parallel line through $P+hN(P)$ to the tangent $t$ of the curve $X$ at $P$.
We let $d_P(h)$ the distance from the center $G$ of gravity of the section of $X$ cut off by $l$
to the tangent $t$ of the curve $X$ at $P$. Then $X$ is an open part of a parabola if and only if
it satisfies
\vskip 0.3cm
\noindent $(E):$ For a fixed point $P$ on $X$ and a sufficiently small $h>0$, we have
\begin{equation}\tag{1.3}
\begin{aligned}
d_P(h)=\frac{3}{5}h.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
\vskip 0.3cm
Throughout this article, all curves are of class $C^{(3)}$ and connected, unless otherwise mentioned.
\vskip 0.50cm
\section{Preliminaries and Theorem 2}
\vskip 0.50cm
Suppose that $X$ is a strictly locally convex curve in the plane
${\mathbb R}^{2}$ with the unit normal $N$ pointing to the convex side.
For a fixed point $P \in X$, and for a sufficiently small $h>0$, consider the parallel line $l$ through
$P+hN(P)$ to
the tangent $t$ of $X$ at $P$.
Let's denote by $A$ and $B$ the points where the line $l$ intersects the curve $X$.
We denote by $S_P(h)$ (respectively, $R_P(h)$) the area of the region bounded by the curve $X$ and chord $AB$
(respectively, of the rectangle with a side $AB$ and another one on the tangent $t$ of $X$ at $P$ with height $h>0$).
We also denote by $L_P(h)$ the length of the chord $AB$.
Then we have $R_P(h)=hL_P(h)$.
We may adopt a coordinate system $(x,y)$
of ${\mathbb R}^{2}$ in such a way that $P$ is taken to be the origin $(0,0)$
and the $x$-axis is the tangent line of $X$ at $P$.
Furthermore, we may assume that $X$ is locally
the graph of a non-negative strictly convex function $f: {\mathbb R}\rightarrow {\mathbb R}$.
\vskip 0.3cm
For a sufficiently small $h>0$, we have
\begin{equation}\tag{2.1}
\begin{aligned}
S_P(h)&=\int _{f(x)<h}\{h-f(x)\}dx,\\
R_P(h)&= hL_P(h)=h\int _{f(x)<h}1dx.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
The integration is taken on the interval $I_P(h)=\{x\in {\mathbb R}| f(x)<h\}$.
On the other hand, we also have
$$
S_P(h)=\int _{y=0}^{h}L_P(y)dy,
$$
which shows that
\begin{equation}\tag{2.2}
\begin{aligned}
S_P'(h)=L_P(h).
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
\vskip 0.3cm
First of all, we need the following lemma (\cite{kk4}), which is useful in this article.
\vskip 0.3cm
\noindent {\bf Lemma 5.} Suppose that $X$ is a strictly locally convex curve in the plane
${\mathbb R}^{2}$ with the unit normal $N$ pointing to the convex side. Then
we have
\begin{equation}\tag{2.3}
\begin{aligned}
\lim_{h\rightarrow 0} \frac{1}{\sqrt{h}}L_P(h)= \frac{2\sqrt{2}}{\sqrt{\kappa(P)}},
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
where $\kappa(P)$ is the curvature of $X$ at $P$ with respect to the unit normal $N$.
\vskip 0.3cm
From Lemma 5, we get a geometric meaning of curvature $\kappa(P)$ of a locally strictly
convex plane curve $X$ at a point $P\in M$. That is, we obtain
\begin{equation}\tag{2.4}
\begin{aligned}
\kappa(P)=\lim_{h\rightarrow 0} \frac{8h}{L_P(h)^2}.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
\vskip 0.30cm
Now, we give a proof of Theorem 2.
Let us denote by $d_P(h)$ the distance from the center $G$ of gravity of the section of $X$ cut off by $l$
to the tangent $t$ of the curve $X$ at $P$. Note that the curve $X$ is of class $C^{(3)}$.
If we adopt a coordinate system $(x,y)$
of ${\mathbb R}^{2}$ as in the beginning of this section, then the curve $X$ is locally
the graph of a non-negative strictly convex $C^{(3)}$ function $f: {\mathbb R}\rightarrow {\mathbb R}$.
Hence, the Taylor's formula of $f(x)$ is given by
\begin{equation}\tag{2.5}
f(x)= ax^2 + f_3(x),
\end{equation}
where $a=f''(0)/2$, and $f_3(x)$ is an $O(|x|^3)$ function.
Since $\kappa(P)=2a>0$, we see that $a$ is positive.
From the definition of $d_P(h)$, we have
\begin{equation}\tag{2.6}
\begin{aligned}
S_P(h)d_P(h)=\phi(h),
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
where we put
\begin{equation}\tag{2.7}
\begin{aligned}
\phi(h)=\frac{1}{2}\int_{f(x)<h}\{h^2-f(x)^2\}dx.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
We decompose $\phi(h)=\phi_1(h)-\phi_2(h)$ as follows:
\begin{equation}\tag{2.8}
\begin{aligned}
\phi_1(h)=\frac{1}{2}\int_{f(x)<h}h^2dx, \quad \phi_2(h)=\frac{1}{2}\int_{f(x)<h}f(x)^2dx.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
It follows from the definition of $L_P(h)$ that
\begin{equation}\tag{2.9}
\begin{aligned}
\phi_1(h)=\frac{1}{2}h^2L_P(h).
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
Hence, Lemma 5 shows that
\begin{equation}\tag{2.10}
\begin{aligned}
\lim_{h\rightarrow0}\frac{\phi_1(h)}{h^2\sqrt{h}}=\frac{\sqrt{2}}{\sqrt{\kappa(P)}}.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
\vskip 0.3cm
\noindent {\bf Lemma 6.} For the limit of $\phi_2(h)/(h^2\sqrt{h})$ as $h$ tends to $0$, we get
\begin{equation}\tag{2.11}
\begin{aligned}
\lim_{h\rightarrow0}\frac{\phi_2(h)}{h^2\sqrt{h}}=\frac{\sqrt{2}}{5\sqrt{\kappa(P)}}.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
\noindent {\bf Proof.}
If we put $g(x)=f(x)^2$, then we have from (2.5)
\begin{equation}\tag{2.12}
g(x)= a^2x^4 + f_5(x),
\end{equation}
where $f_5(x)$ is an $O(|x|^5)$ function. We let $x=\sqrt{h}\xi$.
Then, together with (2.5), (2.8) gives
\begin{equation}\tag{2.13}
\begin{aligned}
\frac{\phi_2(h)}{h^2\sqrt{h}}&=\frac{1}{2h^2\sqrt{h}}\int_{f(x)<h}g(x)dx\\
&=\frac{1}{2h^2}\int_{a\xi^2+g_3(\sqrt{h}\xi)<1}g(\sqrt{h}\xi)d\xi,
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
where we denote $g_3(\sqrt{h}\xi)=\frac{f_3(\sqrt{h}\xi)}{h}$.
Since $f_3(x)$ is an $O(|x|^3)$ function, we have for some constant $C_1$
\begin{equation}\tag{2.14}
\begin{aligned}
|g_3(\sqrt{h}\xi)|\le C_1\sqrt{h}|\xi|^3.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
We also obtain from (2.12) that
\begin{equation}\tag{2.15}
\begin{aligned}
\frac{ |g(\sqrt{h}\xi)-a^2h^2\xi^4|}{h^2}\le C_2\sqrt{h}|\xi|^5
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
where $C_2$ is a constant.
If we let $h \rightarrow 0$,
it follows from (2.13)-(2.15) that
\begin{equation} \tag{2.16}
\begin{aligned}
\lim_{h\rightarrow 0} \frac{\phi_2(h)}{h^2\sqrt{h}}&=\frac{1}{2}\int_{a\xi^2<1}a^2\xi^4d\xi\\&= \frac{1}{5\sqrt{a}}.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
This completes the proof of Lemma 6.
$\square$
\vskip 0.3cm
Together with (2.10), Lemma 6 shows that
\begin{equation}\tag{2.17}
\begin{aligned}
\lim_{h\rightarrow0}\frac{\phi(h)}{h^2\sqrt{h}}=\frac{4\sqrt{2}}{5\sqrt{\kappa(P)}}.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
Since $S_P'(h)=L_P(h)$, it follows from Lemma 5 that
\begin{equation}\tag{2.18}
\begin{aligned}
\lim_{h\rightarrow 0} \frac{1}{h\sqrt{h}}S_P(h)= \frac{4\sqrt{2}}{3\sqrt{\kappa(P)}}.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
Thus, together with (2.17) and (2.18), (2.6) completes the proof of Theorem 2.
\vskip 0.50cm
\section{Proof of Theorem 3}
\vskip 0.5cm
In this section, we give a proof of Theorem 3.
Let $X$ be the graph of a strictly convex function
$g:I\rightarrow {\mathbb R}$ in the $uv$-plane
${\mathbb R}^{2}$ with the upward unit normal $N$.
For a fixed point $P=(b,c)\in X$ with $c=g(b)$,
we denote by $\theta$ the angle between
the normal $N(P)$ and the positive $v$-axis.
Then we have $g'(b)=\tan \theta$ and
$V=(b, c+wh)$ for sufficiently small $h>0$,
where $w=\sqrt{1+g'(b)^2}=\sec \theta$.
By a change of coordinates in the plane ${\mathbb R}^{2}$ given by
\begin{equation}\tag{3.1}
\begin{aligned}
u&=x\cos \theta -y\sin \theta +b,\\
v&=x\sin \theta +y \cos \theta +c,
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
the graph $X: v=g(u), u\in I$ is represented by $X: y=f(x), x\in J$,
$P$ by the origin and $V$ by the point $(\alpha h, h)$, where $\alpha =\tan\theta$.
Since $f(0)=f'(0)=0$, the Taylor's formula of $f(x)$ is given by
\begin{equation}\tag{3.2}
f(x)= ax^2 + f_3(x),
\end{equation}
where $a=f''(0)/2$, and $f_3(x)$ is an $O(|x|^3)$ function.
Since $\kappa(P)=2a>0$, we see that $a$ is positive.
For a sufficiently small $h>0$, it follows from the definition
of the center $G=(\bar{x}_P(h), \bar{y}_P(h))$ of gravity
of the section of $X$ cut off by the parallel line $l$ through $P+hN(P)$ to the
tangent $t$ of $X$ at $P$ that
\begin{equation}\tag{3.3}
\begin{aligned}
\bar{y}_P(h)S_P(h)&=\phi(h),\\
\bar{x}_P(h)S_P(h)&=\psi(h),
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
where we put
\begin{equation}\tag{3.4}
\begin{aligned}
\phi(h)=\frac{1}{2}\int_{f(x)<h}\{h^2-f(x)^2\}dx
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
and
\begin{equation}\tag{3.5}
\begin{aligned}
\psi(h)=\int_{f(x)<h}\{x(h-f(x))\}dx.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
First of all, we get
\vskip 0.30cm
\noindent {\bf Lemma 7.} If we let $I_P(h)=\{x|f(x)<h\}=(x_1(h), x_2(h))$, then we have
\begin{equation}\tag{3.6}
\begin{aligned}
\phi'(h)&=h\{x_2(h)-x_1(h)\}=hL_P(h)\\
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
and
\begin{equation}\tag{3.7}
\begin{aligned}
\psi'(h)&=\frac{1}{2}\{x_2(h)^2-x_1(h)^2\}.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
\vskip 0.30cm
\noindent {\bf Proof.}
If we put $\bar{f}(x)=f(x)^2$ and $k=h^2$, then we have
\begin{equation}\tag{3.8}
\begin{aligned}
2\phi(h)&=\int_{f(x)^2<h^2}\{h^2-f(x)^2\}dx\\
&=\int_{\bar{f}(x)<k}\{k-\bar{f}(x)\}dx.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
We denote by $\bar{S}_P(k)$ the area of the region bounded by the graph of $y=\bar{f}(x)$ and
the line $y=k$. Then (3.8) shows that
\begin{equation}\tag{3.9}
\begin{aligned}
2\phi(h)=\bar{S}_P(k).
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
It follows from (2.2) that
\begin{equation}\tag{3.10}
\begin{aligned}
\frac{d}{dk}\bar{S}_P(k)=\bar{L}_P(k),
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
where $\bar{L}_P(k)$ denotes the length of the interval $\bar{I}_P(k)=\{x\in {\mathbb R}| \bar{f}(x)<k\}$.
Since $k=h^2$, $\bar{I}_P(k)$ coincides with the interval $I_P(h)=\{x\in {\mathbb R}| f(x)<h\}$.
Hence we get $\bar{L}_P(k)=L_P(h)$. This, together with (3.9) and (3.10) shows that
\begin{equation}\tag{3.11}
\begin{aligned}
\phi'(h)=hL_P(h),
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
which completes the proof of (3.6).
Finally, note that $\psi(h)$ is also given by
\begin{equation}\tag{3.12}
\begin{aligned}
\psi(h)=\frac{1}{2}\int_{y=0}^h\{x_2(y)^2-x_1(y)^2\}dy,
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
which shows that (3.7) holds.
This completes the proof of Lemma 7. $\square$
\vskip 0.30cm
We, now, suppose that $X$ satisfies Condition $(D)$. Then for each
sufficiently small $h>0$,
$V=(\alpha h,h)$.
Hence, we obtain $G=\frac{3}{5}(\alpha h,h)$. Therefore we get from (3.3) that
\begin{equation}\tag{3.13}
\begin{aligned}
\frac{3}{5}hS_P(h)&=\phi(h)\\
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
and
\begin{equation}\tag{3.14}
\begin{aligned}
\frac{3}{5}\alpha hS_P(h)&=\psi(h).
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
It also follows from (3.13) and (3.14) that
\begin{equation}\tag{3.15}
\begin{aligned}
\psi(h)=\alpha \phi(h).
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
By differentiating (3.13) with respect to $h$, (3.6) shows that
\begin{equation}\tag{3.16}
\begin{aligned}
S_P(h)=\frac{2}{3}hL_P(h).
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
Differentiating (3.16) with respect to $h$ yields
\begin{equation}\tag{3.17}
\begin{aligned}
2hL_P'(h)=L_P(h).
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
Integrating (3.17) shows that
\begin{equation}\tag{3.18}
\begin{aligned}
L_P(h)=C(P)\sqrt{h},
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
where $C(P)$ is a constant. Hence, it follows from Lemma 5 that
\begin{equation}\tag{3.19}
\begin{aligned}
L_P(h)=\frac{2}{\sqrt{a}}\sqrt{h},
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
from which we get
\begin{equation}\tag{3.20}
\begin{aligned}
x_2(h)-x_1(h)=\frac{2}{\sqrt{a}}\sqrt{h}.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
Now, differentiating (3.15) and applying Lemma 7 show that
\begin{equation}\tag{3.21}
\begin{aligned}
x_2(h)+x_1(h)=2\alpha h.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
Hence, we get from (3.20) and (3.21) that
\begin{equation}\tag{3.22}
\begin{aligned}
x_1(h)=\alpha h - \frac{1}{\sqrt{a}}\sqrt{h}, \quad x_2(h)=\alpha h + \frac{1}{\sqrt{a}}\sqrt{h}.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
Since $I_P(h)=(x_1(h), x_2(h))$, we obtain from (3.22) that the graph $X:y=f(x)$ is
given by
\begin{equation}\tag{3.23}
\begin{aligned}
f(x)= \begin{cases}
\frac{1}{2a\alpha^2}\{2a\alpha x +1-\sqrt{4a\alpha x +1}\}, & \text{if $\alpha\ne 0,$} \\
ax^2, & \text{if $\alpha= 0.$}
\end{cases}
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
It follows from (3.23) that
$X$ is an open part of the parabola defined by
\begin{equation}\tag{3.24}
\begin{aligned}
ax^2-2a\alpha xy +a\alpha^2y^2-y=0.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
Note that if $\alpha\ne 0,$ the function $f(x)$ in (3.23) is defined on an interval $J$ such that
$J\subset ( -\infty, -1/(4a\alpha))$ or $J\subset ( -1/(4a\alpha), \infty)$
according to the sign of $\alpha$.
Finally, we use the following coordinate change from (3.1):
\begin{equation}\tag{3.25}
\begin{aligned}
x&=u\cos \theta +v\sin \theta -b\cos \theta -c\sin \theta,\\
y&=-u\sin \theta +v \cos \theta +b\sin \theta -c\cos \theta.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
Then, after a long calculation we see that the curve $X:v=g(u)$ is an
open part of the parabola determined by the following quadratic polynomial
\begin{equation}\tag{3.26}
\begin{aligned}
g(u)= \begin{cases}
aw^3(u-b)^2+\alpha(u-b) +c, & \text{if $\alpha\ne 0,$} \\
a(u-b)^2+c, & \text{if $\alpha= 0.$}
\end{cases}
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
Note that $g(b)=c, g'(b)=\alpha$ and $\kappa(P)=2a$.
This completes the proof of the if part of Theorem 3.
\vskip 0.30cm
It is elementary to show the only if part of Theorem 3, or see Chapter 7 of \cite{st},
which is originally due to Archimedes.
This completes the proof of Theorem 3.
\vskip 0.50cm
\section{Proof of Theorem 4}
\vskip 0.5cm
In this section, using Proposition 1, we give the proof of Theorem 4.
Let $X$ be a strictly locally convex plane curve in the plane
${\mathbb R}^{2}$ with the unit normal $N$ pointing to the convex side.
For a fixed point $P$ on $X$ and a sufficiently small $h>0$,
we denote by $l$ the parallel line through $P+hN(P)$ to the tangent $t$ of the curve $X$ at $P$.
We let $d_P(h)$ the distance from the center $G$ of gravity of the section of $X$ cut off by $l$
to the tangent $t$ of the curve $X$ at $P$.
First, suppose that $X$ satisfies Condition $(E)$.
For a fixed point $P\in X$,
we adopt a coordinate system $(x,y)$
of ${\mathbb R}^{2}$ as in the beginning of Section 2. Then the curve $X$ is locally
the graph of a non-negative strictly convex $C^{(3)}$ function $f: {\mathbb R}\rightarrow {\mathbb R}$.
Hence, the Taylor's formula of $f(x)$ is given by
\begin{equation}\tag{4.1}
f(x)= ax^2 + f_3(x),
\end{equation}
where $a=f''(0)/2$, and $f_3(x)$ is an $O(|x|^3)$ function.
Since $\kappa(P)=2a>0$, we see that $a$ is positive.
It follows from $(E)$ and the definition of $d_P(h)$ that
\begin{equation}\tag{4.2}
\begin{aligned}
\frac{3}{5}hS_P(h)=\phi(h),
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
where we put
\begin{equation}\tag{4.3}
\begin{aligned}
\phi(h)=\frac{1}{2}\int_{f(x)<h}\{h^2-f(x)^2\}dx.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
If we differentiate $ \phi(h)$ with respect to $h$, then Lemma 7 shows that
\begin{equation}\tag{4.4}
\begin{aligned}
\phi'(h)=hL_P(h).
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
By differentiating both sides of (4.2) with respect to $h$, we get from (4.4) and (2.2) that
\begin{equation}\tag{4.5}
\begin{aligned}
S_P(h)=\frac{2}{3}hL_P(h),
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
which shows that the curve $X$ satisfies Condition $(C)$ in Proposition 1.
Note that the argument in the proof of Proposition 1 given by \cite{kk4}
can be applied even if the curve $X$ is a strictly locally convex plane curve.
This completes the proof of the if part of Theorem 4.
\vskip 0.30cm
For a proof of the only if part of Theorem 4, see Chapter 7 of \cite{st},
which is originally due to Archimedes.
This completes the proof of Theorem 4.
\vskip 0.50cm
\noindent {\bf Acknowledgments.}
The authors appreciate Professor Hong-Jong Kim for suggesting to study whether among the strictly convex
plane curves, the
center of gravity properties of parabolic sections characterizes parabolas.
\vskip 0.50cm
|
\section{Introduction}
The study of stochastic processes in an abstract space can date back to as early as \cite{DeMARR}. Works along this line include \cite{GT}, \cite{Ghoussoub}, \cite{Hong}, \cite{Stoica1} and \cite{Stoica2}. About a decade ago, \cite{KLW1} initiated the study of stochastic processes in a measure-free setting. They carefully investigated the fundamental properties of conditional expectations on a probability space and abstract them to Riesz spaces; this allows one to generalize many concepts from probability theory to Riesz spaces. As a result, an order-theoretic approach to stochastic process can be formed to generalize the classical theory of stochastic processes. Since then this order-theoretic approach to stochastic processes has been developing fast. For order-theoretic investigation of conditional expectations and related concepts, we refer to \cite{GP}, \cite{Hong}, \cite{KLW4}, \cite{Watson1}; for discrete-time processes in Riesz spaces, we refer to \cite{KL1}, \cite{KLW1}, \cite{KLW2}, \cite{KLW3}, \cite{KLW5}, \cite{KLW6}, \cite{KVW1}, \cite{Troitsky}; for continuous-time processes in Riesz spaces, we refer to \cite{Grobler1}, \cite{Grobler2}, \cite{Grobler3}, \cite{Grobler4}, \cite{Grobler5}, \cite{GLM1}, \cite{VW1}, \cite{VW2}; for stochastic integrals in Riesz spaces, we refer to \cite{GL1}, \cite{GL2}, \cite{LW1}.
\cite{KLW6} extended the notation of independence to Riesz spaces; \cite{Grobler4} gave a slightly more general definition of independence in Riesz spaces. In this note, we follow \cite{KLW6} to extend the concept of conditional probability to Riesz spaces and then establish the law of total probability and Bayes' theorem in Riesz spaces; we also prove an inclusion-exclusion formula in Riesz spaces. Several examples are given to show that the concept of conditional probability, law of total probability, Bayes' theorem and inclusion-exclusion formula in probability theory are special cases of our results.
The remainder of this note is organized as follows. Section 2 review some basic concepts and results of Riesz spaces and conditional expectations in Riesz spaces; for further details, we refer readers to \cite{AB2}, \cite{Fuchs1}, \cite{KLW4}, \cite{LZ}, \cite{Watson1} and \cite{Zaanen}. Section 3 generalizes the concept of conditional probability to Riesz spaces; we show that this notion leads naturally to the notion of independence in Riesz spaces. Section 4 establishes the law of total probability, Bayes' theorem and the inclusion-exclusion formula in Riesz spaces.
\section{Preliminaries of Riesz space theory}
A partially ordered set $(X, \leq)$ is called a \emph{lattice} if the infimum and supremum of any pair of elements in $X$ exist. A real vector space $X$ equipped with a partial order $\leq$ is called an \emph{ordered vector space} if its vector space structure is compatible with the order structure in a manner such that
\begin{enumerate}
\item [(a)]if $x\leq y$, then $x+z\leq y+z$ for any $z\in X$;
\item [(b)]if $x\leq y$, then $\alpha x\leq \alpha y$ for all $\alpha\geq 0$.
\end{enumerate}
An ordered vector space is called a \emph{Riesz space} (or a \emph{vector lattice}) if it is also a lattice at the same time. For any pair $x, y$ in a Riesz space, $x\vee y$ denotes and supremum of $\{x, y\}$, $x\wedge y$ denotes the infimum of $\{x, y\}$, and $|x|$ denotes $x\vee (-x)$. A Riesz space $X$ is said to be \emph{Dedekind complete} if every nonempty subset of $X$ that is bounded from above has a supremum. A vector subspace of a Riesz space is said to be a \emph{Riesz subspace} if it is closed under the lattice operation $\vee$. A subset $Y$ of a Riesz space $X$ is said to be \emph{solid} if $|x| \leq |y|$ and $y\in Y$ imply that $x\in Y$. A solid vector subspace of a Riesz space is called an \emph{ideal}. A net $(x_{\alpha})_{\alpha\in A}$ is said to be \emph{decreasing} if $\alpha\geq \beta$ implies $x_{\alpha}\leq x_{\beta}$. The notation $x_{\alpha}\downarrow x$ means $(x_{\alpha})_{\alpha\in A}$ is a decreasing net and the infimum of the set $\{x_{\alpha}\mid \alpha\in A\}$ is $x$. A net $(x_{\alpha})_{\alpha\in A}$ in a Riesz space $X$ is said to be \emph{order-convergent} to an element $x\in X$, often written as $x_{\alpha}\xrightarrow{o} x$, if there exists another net $(y_{\alpha})_{\alpha\in A}$ in $X$ such that $|x_{\alpha}-x|\leq y_{\alpha}\downarrow 0$. A subset $A$ of a Riesz space $X$ is said to be \emph{order-closed} if a net $\{x_{\alpha}\}$ in $A$ order-converges to $x_{0}\in X$ implies that $x_0\in A$. An order-closed ideal is called a \emph{band}. Two elements $x$ and $y$ in a Riesz space $X$ is said to be \emph{disjoint} if $|x|\wedge |y|=0$ and is denoted by $x\bot y$. The \emph{disjoint complement} of a subset $A$ of a Riesz space $X$ is defined as $A^d=\{x\in X\mid x\wedge y\text{ for all $y\in A$}\}$. A band $B$ in a Riesz space is said to be a \emph{projection band} if $X$ equals the direct sum of $B$ and $B^d$, that is, $X=B\oplus B^d$. Every band in a Dedekind complete Riesz space is a projection band. If $B$ is a projection band of a Riesz space $X$ and $x\in X$, then $x=x_1+x_2$, where $x_1\in B$ and $x_2\in B^d$. In this case, the map $P_B: X\rightarrow X$ defined by $P_B(x)=x_1$ is called the \emph{band projection} associated with $B$.
An additive group $G,$ equipped with a partial order $\leq$ is called a \emph{partially ordered group} if its group operation is compatible with the order structure in a manner such that
\begin{enumerate}
\item [(a)]if $x\leq y$, then $x+z\leq y+z$ for any $z\in G$;
\item [(b)]if $x\leq y$, then $z+x\leq z+y$ for any $z\in G$.
\end{enumerate}
A partially ordered group is said to be a \emph{lattice-ordered group} if it is also a lattice at the same time. Lattice-ordered rings and lattice-ordered fields are defined in a similar manner. Specifically, a ring $R$ equipped with a partial order $\leq$ is called a \emph{partially ordered ring} if its ring operations are compatible with the order structure in a manner such that
\begin{enumerate}
\item [(a)]if $x\leq y$, then $x+z\leq y+z$ for any $z\in R$;
\item [(b)]if $x\leq y$ and $z>0$, then $x z\leq y z$ and $z x\leq z y$.
\end{enumerate}
A partially ordered ring is said to be a \emph{lattice-ordered ring} if its additive group is a lattice-ordered group. Likewise, a field $F$ equipped with a partial order $\leq$ is called a \emph{partially ordered field} if its field operations are compatible with the order structure in a manner such that
\begin{enumerate}
\item [(a)]if $x\leq y$, then $x+z\leq y+z$ for any $z\in F$;
\item [(b)]if $x> y$ and $z>0$, then $x z>y z$;
\item [(c)]$1>0$, where $1$ is the identity element of $F$.
\end{enumerate}
A partially ordered field is said to be a \emph{lattice-ordered field} if its additive group is a lattice-ordered group.
A linear operator $T$ on a vector space $X$ is said to be a \emph{projection} if $T^2=T$. A linear operator $T$ between two Riesz spaces $X$ and $Y$ is said to be \emph{positive} if $x\in X$ and $x\geq 0$ implies $T(x)\geq 0$; $T$ is said to be \emph{strictly positive} if $x\in X$ and $x>0$ implies $T(x)>0$; $T$ is said to be \emph{order-continuous} if $x_{\alpha}\xrightarrow{o} 0$ in $X$ implies $T(x_{\alpha})\xrightarrow{o} 0$ in $Y$. A linear operator $T$ on a vector space $V$ is called an \emph{averaging operator} if $T(y T(x))=T(y)T(x)$ for any pair $x, y \in V$ such that $y T(x)\in V$.
Following \cite{KLW1} and \cite{KLW4}, we say a positive order-continuous projection on a Riesz space $X$ with a weak order unit $e$ is a \emph{conditional expectation} if the range $R(T)$ of $T$ is a Dedekind complete Riesz subspace of $X$ and $T(e)$ is a weak order unit of $X$ for every weak order unit $e$ of $X$. If $T$ is a conditional expectation on a Riesz space $X$, then there is a weak order unit $e$ such that $T(e)=e$.
\section{Conditional probability in Riesz spaces}
To extend the notion of conditional probability in probability theory to Riesz spaces, we first recall the following definition.
\begin{definition}\label{definition2.0}
Let $(\Omega, \mathcal{F}, P)$ be a probability space. Suppose $A$ and $B$ be two events such that $P(B)>0$. Then the conditional probability $P(A\mid B)$ of $A$ given $B$ is defined as
\begin{equation*}
P(A\mid B)=\frac{P(A\cap B)}{P(B)}.
\end{equation*}
\end{definition}
Intuitively, $P(A\mid B)$ measures the relative size of the projection of $A$ onto $B$. This motivates the following definition.
\begin{definition}\label{definition2.1}
Let $E$ be a Dedekind complete lattice-ordered field with a conditional expectation $T$ and a weak unit $e$ such that $T(e)=e$. Suppose $B_1$ and $B_2$ are two projection bands, $P_{B_1}$ and $P_{B_2}$ are the corresponding band projections of $B_1$ and $B_2$, respectively, and $B_1\cap B_2\neq \phi$. Then the conditional probability $P_{B_1\mid B_2}$ of $B_1$ given $B_2$ with respect to $T$ is defined as
\begin{equation}\label{2.1}
P(B_1\mid B_2)(f)=[TP_{B_2}P_{B_1}(f)][TP_{B_2}(f)]^{-1}, \quad \forall f\in E.
\end{equation}
provided $TP_{B_2}(f)\neq 0$.
\end{definition}
\noindent \textbf{Remark.} We require $E$ to be a lattice-ordered field because we need the multiplication operation on $E$ to be invertible. It is evident that if $P_{B_1}=P_{B_2}$ then $P_{B_1\mid B_2}=I$, where $I$ is the identity operator on $E$. Since two band projections on a Riesz space are commutative, Equation (\ref{2.1}) may be replaced by
\begin{equation}\label{2.2}
P(B_1\mid B_2)(f)=\left[TP_{B_1}P_{B_2} (f)\right][TP_{B_2}(f)]^{-1}, \quad \forall f\in E,\nonumber
\end{equation}
provided $TP_{B_2}(f)\neq 0$.
\bigskip
The following example shows that the classical definition of conditional probability is a special case of Definition 2.1.\\
\noindent \textbf{Example 2.1.} Let $E$ be the family of all random variables with finite mean on a probability space $(\Omega, \mathcal{F}, P)$, that is, $E=L^1(\Omega, \mathcal{F}, P)$. Then $e=1_{\Omega}$, where $1_{A}$ denotes the indicator function of an event $A$. Let $T$ be the expectation operator. For two events $A, B\in\mathcal{F}$ with $B\neq \phi$, the bands generated by $1_A$ and $1_B$ are $B_1=L^1(A, \mathcal{F}\cap A, P)$ and $B_2=L^1(B, \mathcal{F}\cap B, P)$, respectively. Therefore, the corresponding band projections $P_{B_1}$ and $P_{B_2}$ are defined as $P_{B_1}(f)=f1_A$ and $P_{B_2}(f)=f1_B$. We have
\begin{equation*}
TP_{B_2}(e)=E[1_{\Omega}1_B]=P(B),
\end{equation*}
and
\begin{equation*}
TP_{B_2}P_{B_1}(e)=E[1_{\Omega}1_B1_A]=P(A\cap B).
\end{equation*}
It follows that $P(B_1\mid B_2)=P(A\mid B)$ which is consistent with the classical definition of conditional probability of $A$ given $B$. \\
Recall that in probability theory two events $A$ and $B$ are defined to be \emph{independent} if $P(A\mid B)$ does not depend on $B$ and $P(B\mid A)$ does not depend on $A$ , that is $P(A\mid B)=P(A)$ and $P(B\mid A)=P(B)$. To accommodate the case $P(B)=0$, we usually define two events $A$ and $B$ to be \emph{independent} if $P(A\cap B)=P(A)P(B)$. Thus, Definition \ref{definition2.1} leads naturally to the following concept of independence in Riesz spaces.
\begin{definition}\label{definition2.2}
Let $E$ be a Dedekind complete lattice-ordered ring with a conditional expectation $T$ and a weak unit $e$ such that $T(e)=e$ and the multiplication operation coincide with the lattice operation $\wedge$. Suppose $B_1$ and $B_2$ are two projection bands of $E$ and $P_{B_1}$ and $P_{B_2}$ are the associated band projections of $B_1$ and $B_2$, respectively. We say $B_1$ and $B_2$ are independent with respect to $T$ if $TP_{B_2}P_{B_1}(e)=TP_{B_2}(e)TP_{B_1}(e)$.
\end{definition}
\noindent \textbf{Remark.} In Definition \ref{definition2.2}, we assume that $E$ is a Dedekind complete lattice-ordered ring and its multiplication is the lattice operation $\wedge$. Definition 4.1 in \cite{KLW6} defines two projection bands $P_{B_1}$ and $P_{B_2}$ to be independent with respect to a conditional expectation $T$ in a Dedekind complete Riesz space if
\begin{equation*}
TP_{B_1}TP_{B_2}(e)=TP_{B_1}P_{B_2}(e)=TP_{B_2}TP_{B_1}(e).
\end{equation*}
As \cite{KVW1} pointed out, the space of $e$ bounded elements in $E$ will admit a natural f-algebra structure if we set $P(e)Q(e)=PQ(e)$ for two band projections $P$ and $Q$. In view of this, our definition and Definition 4.1 in \cite{KLW6} are consistent.
\section{Law of total probability and Bayes' theorem in Riesz spaces}
In probability theory, the law of total probability and Bayes' theorem are two fundamental theorems involving conditional probability. In this section,
we will extend these two theorems to Riesz spaces. We will also give examples to show that the classical law of total probability and Bayes' theorem are special cases
of law of total probability and Bayes' theorem in Riesz spaces. To motivate our study, we first recall the \emph{law of total probability} in probability theory:
\begin{theorem}\label{theorem3.1}
Suppose $B_1, ..., B_n$ are mutually disjoint events on a probability space $(\Omega, \mathcal{F}, P)$ such that $\Omega=\cup_{i=1}B_i$ and $P(B_i)>0$ for each $1\leq i\leq n$. Then for any event $A$
\begin{equation*}
P(A)=\sum_{i=1}^nP(A\mid B_i)P(B_i).
\end{equation*}
\end{theorem}
Since $P(A\mid B_i)P(B_i)=P(A\cap B_i)$, the intuition of law of total probability can be described as follows: If an event $A$ is the union of $n$ mutually disjoint sub-events $A\cap B_i$, then the projection onto $A$ is equivalent to the sum of all projections onto $A\cap B_i$'s, that is,
\begin{equation*}
P(A)=\sum_{i=1}^nP(A\cap B_i).
\end{equation*}
This intuition extends naturally to the abstract case of Riesz spaces as the next theorem shows.
To this end, we first state and prove an inclusion-exclusion formula for projection bands; this result extends the classical inclusion-exclusion theorem
for events to Riesz spaces. \\
\begin{lemma}[Inclusion-exclusion formula for projection bands]\label{lemma3.1}
Let $B_1, ..., B_n$ be $n$ projection bands in a Riesz space. Then $B_1+...+B_n$ is a projection band and
\begin{eqnarray}\label{2.4}
P_{B_1+...+B_n} &=& \sum_{i=1}^nP_{B_i}-\sum_{1\leq i_1<i_2\leq n} P_{B_{i_1}\cap B_{i_2}} \nonumber\\
& & +...+(-1)^{k-1}\sum_{1\leq i_1<...<i_k\leq n} P_{B_{i_1}\cap...\cap B_{i_k}}\nonumber \\
& & +...+(-1)^{n-1} P_{B_1\cap...\cap B_n}.
\end{eqnarray}
\end{lemma}
\begin{proof}
The fact that $B_1+...+B_n$ is a projection band is trivial. We show Equation (\ref{2.4}) by induction on $n$. The case $n=2$ follows from Theorem 1.45 of \cite{AB2}. Suppose Equation (\ref{2.4}) holds for $n-1$. Then the induction hypothesis implies
\begin{eqnarray*}
P_{B_1+...+B_n} &=& P_{B_1+...+B_{n-1}}+P_{B_n}-P_{B_1+...+B_{n-1}}P_{B_n} \\
&=& \sum_{i=1}^{n-1}P_{B_i}-\sum_{1\leq i_1<i_2\leq n} P_{B_{i_1}\cap B_{i_2}}+...\\
& & +(-1)^{k-1}\sum_{1\leq i_1<...<i_k\leq n} P_{B_{i_1}\cap...\cap B_{i_k}}+...+(-1)^{n-2}P_{B_1\cap...\cap B_{n-1}}\\
& & +P_{B_n}-P_{B_1+...+B_{n-1}}P_{B_n}\\
&=& \sum_{i=1}^{n-1}P_{B_i}-\sum_{1\leq i_1<i_2\leq n} P_{B_{i_1}\cap B_{i_2}}+...\\
& & +(-1)^{k-1}\sum_{1\leq i_1<...<i_{k}\leq n} P_{B_{i_1}\cap...\cap B_{i_k}}+...+(-1)^{n-2}P_{B_1\cap...\cap B_{n-1}}\\
& & +P_{B_n}-\bigg \lbrack \sum_{i=1}^{n-1}P_{B_i}-\sum_{1\leq i_1<i_2\leq n} P_{B_{i_1}\cap B_{i_2}}+...\\
& & +(-1)^{k-2}\sum_{1\leq i_1<...<i_{k-1}\leq n} P_{B_{i_1}\cap...\cap B_{i_{k-1}}}+...+(-1)^{n-2}P_{B_1\cap...\cap B_{n-1}} \bigg \rbrack P_{B_n}\\
&=& \sum_{i=1}^{n-1}P_{B_i}+P_{B_n} \\
& & -(\sum_{i=1}^{n-1} P_{B_i})P_{B_n}-\sum_{1\leq i_1<i_2\leq n}} P_{B_{i_1}\cap B_{i_2}\\
& & +...+\\
& & (-1)^{k-1}\sum_{1\leq i_1<...<i_k\leq n} P_{B_{i_1}\cap...\cap B_{i_k}}+(-1)^{k-1}\sum_{1\leq i_1<...<i_{k-1}\leq n} P_{B_{i_1}\cap...\cap B_{i_{k-1}}}P_{B_n}\\
& & +...+\\
& & +(-1)^{n-1}P_{B_1\cap ...\cap B_{n-1}}P_{B_n}\\
&=& \sum_{i=1}^nP_{B_i}-\sum_{1\leq i_1<i_2\leq n} P_{B_{i_1}\cap B_{i_2}}\\ \nonumber
& & +...+(-1)^{k-1}\sum_{1\leq i_1<...<i_k\leq n} P_{B_{i_1}\cap...\cap B_{i_k}}\\ \nonumber
& & +...+(-1)^{n-1} P_{B_1\cap...\cap B_n}.
\end{eqnarray*}
By mathematical induction, (\ref{2.4}) holds for all positive integer $n$.
\end{proof}
\begin{theorem}[Law of total probability in Riesz spaces]\label{theorem3.2}
Let $E$ be a Dedekind complete lattice-ordered field with a conditional expectation $T$ and a weak unit $e$ such that $T(e)=e$. Suppose $B_1, ..., B_n$ are $n$ mutually disjoint nonempty projection bands such that $E=B_1\oplus B_2 \oplus...\oplus B_n$and $P_{B_i}$ is the band projection onto $B_i$. Then for any projection band $D$ and its associated band projection $P_D$
\begin{equation}\label{2.3}
TP_D(f)=\sum_{i=1}^n (P_{D\mid B_i}(f))(TP_{B_i}(f)),\quad \forall f\in E.
\end{equation}
provided $TP_{B_i}(f)\neq 0$ for all $1\leq i\leq n$.
\end{theorem}
\begin{proof}
Definition \ref{definition2.1} shows that the right-hand side of Equation (\ref{2.3}) equals
\begin{eqnarray*}
\sum_{i=1}^n T(P_D P_{B_i}) &=& T \left[\sum_{i=1}^n (P_{D\cap B_i})\right]\nonumber
\end{eqnarray*}
Since $B_i$'s are mutually disjoint, $P_{D\cap B_i}\cap P_{D\cap B_j}=0$ for $i\neq j$. It follows from Lemma \ref{lemma3.1} that
\begin{eqnarray*}
T \left[\sum_{i=1}^n (P_{D\cap B_i})\right] & = & T \left[ (P_{D\cap (\sum_{i=1}^n B_i)} \right] \\
& =& TP_D.
\end{eqnarray*}
Therefore, the theorem is established.
\end{proof}
Theorem \ref{theorem3.1} and Definition \ref{definition2.1} immediately imply the following Bayes' Theorem in Riesz spaces.
\begin{corollary}[Bayes' Theorem in Riezs spaces]\label{corollary3.1}
Let $E$ be a Dedekind complete lattice-ordered field with a conditional expectation $T$ and a weak unit $e$ such that $Te=e$. Suppose $B_1, ..., B_n$ are $n$ mutually disjoint nonempty projection bands such that $E=B_1\oplus B_2 \oplus...\oplus B_n$and $P_{B_i}$ is the band projection onto $B_i (1\leq i\leq n)$. Then for any projection band $D$ and any $1\leq j\leq n$
\begin{equation}\label{2.5}
P_{B_j\mid D}(f)=\left[(P_{D\mid B_j}(f))(TP_{B_j}(f))\right] \left[\sum_{i=1}^n (P_{D\mid B_i}(f))(TP_{B_i}(f))\right]^{-1},
\quad \forall f\in E, \nonumber
\end{equation}
provided $TP_{B_i}(f)\neq 0$ for all $1\leq i\leq n$.
\end{corollary}
\bigskip
\noindent \textbf{Example 3.1.} Take $E=L^1(\Omega, \mathcal{F}, P)$. Then $e=1_{\Omega}$. Suppose $T$ is the expectation operator and $P_{B_i}$'s are defined as $P_{B_i}(f)=1_{B_i}f$ for $f\in E$, where $B_1, B_2, ..., B_n$ are $n$ disjoint nonempty events such that $\Omega=\cup_{i=1}^n B_i$. Also, for any event $D$ define $P_D(f)=1_Df$ for $f\in E$. Then $TP_D(e)=P(D), TP_{B_i}(e)=P(B_i)$ and $P_{D\mid B_i}(e)=P(D\mid B_i)$; thus, Theorem \ref{theorem3.2} specializes to Theorem \ref{theorem3.1}. Moreover, we have $P_{B_1+...+B_n}(e)=P(\cup_{i=1}^n B_i), P_{B_i} (e)=P(B_i), P_{B_{i_1} \cap B_{i_2}} (e)=P(B_{i_1}\cap B_{i_2}), ...$; hence Lemma \ref{lemma3.1} specializes to the classical inclusion-exclusion formula. Finally, in this case Corollary \ref{corollary3.1} yields
\begin{equation*}
P(B_j\mid D)=\frac{P(D\mid B_j) P(B_j)}{\sum_{i=1}^n P(D\mid B_i)P(B_i)};
\end{equation*}
therefore, Corollary \ref{corollary3.1} specializes to the classical Bayes' theorem.
\section*{Acknowledgements} Thanks are due to Professor Coenraad C.A. Labuschagne for providing the author with reference \cite{KL1}.
\bibliographystyle{amsplain}
|
\section{Introduction}\label{introduction}
The transition to agriculture and pastoralism, termed the ``Neolithic
revolution'' by Childe (1925) has fundamentally changed social systems
and the relationship of people and their environments. However
revolutionary - even termed \enquote{traumatic} (Rowley-Conwy 2004) -
this transition was locally, the more gradual it appears on the
continental scale, spanning almost 10000 years of human prehistory and
history (e.g, Barker 2006).
The spatial diffusion of the new agropastoral and animal husbandry
innovations, technologies, and life styles played a major part in the
abandonment of a foraging life style following local innovations in very
few places worldwide that are associated with the domestication of
plants and animals (Fuller et al. 2014). From these few founder regions,
the new domesticates, their cultivation knowledge and the idea of
farming and herding itself spread to all but the most secluded or
marginal regions of the world; not only these cultural traits spread,
but also people, who carried along their \enquote{hitchiking} traits
(Ackland et al. 2007).
The spatiotemporal pattern of dated Neolithic sites consequently
radiates outward from the founder regions. For different cultural and
individual traits, the apparent rates of spreading can be determined
(Edmonson 1961, Bocquet-Appel et al. (2012)), but it is unclear from the
spatiotemporal analysis of dated sites, what process dominated the
expansion (Lemmen, Gronenborn, and Wirtz 2011): Within a broad spectrum
of diffusion mechanisms that include, e.g., also leapfrog migration and
elite replacement (Zvelebil 1998) demic diffusion and cultural diffusion
represent two contrasting views that have received widespread attention
in the literature. The demic diffusion hypothesis suggests the
introduction of the new agropastoral technologies through movements of
people - migrations of any form; the cultural diffusion hypothesis
suggests a technology shift through indigenous adaptations and
inventions fostered by culture contact - information dispersal of any
form.
Demic diffusion, i.e.~the spread of agropastoralism by migration of
people has been put forward as one of the earliest hypotheses for
explaining the spatiotemporal pattern of Neolithic arrival dates in
Europe (Clark 1965); evidence for demic diffusions is accumulating with
modern mtDNA and Y-chromosomal analyses revealing matrilinear and
patrilinear relationships in space and time (Chikhi et al. 2002,
Deguilloux et al. (2012), Fu et al. (2012)) (although contrasting views
have been presented by Battaglia et al. (2008) and Haak et al. (2010)),
and with earlier linguistic work (Renfrew 1987).
Cultural diffusion is the spread of agropastoralism by information and
material transmission in the absence of migrations. As both maternal and
paternal genetic lines are continuous from the Founder regions into
Europe, approval for the cultural diffusion hypothesis depends on a
temporal mismatch between the expansion of traits and knowledge and the
expansion of people. Already Ammerman and Cavalli-Sforza (1973)
suggested that both demic and diffusive spread are active and that it is
the relative contribution of each that needs to be investigated rather
than deciding on either demic or cultural diffusion. Furthermore,
cultural diffusion theories have also been put forward as a reaction
against processual diffusionist views and emphasize the agency and
innovativity of local populations (Hodder 1990) (but refuted again by
e.g., Rowley-Conwy (2004)).
Mathematical models on the spread of agropastoralism have a long
tradition in Europe and can be traced back to Childe (1925)'s
observations on the spatio-temporal distribution gradient of ceramics
from Southeastern to Northwestern Europe. This pattern was replicated
from Neolithic radiocarbon dates by Clark (1965), and subsequently
mathematically formulated by Ammerman and Cavalli-Sforza (1973) as the
\enquote{wave of advance} model on which many subsequent formulations
have been built (Ackland et al. 2007,Galeta et al. (2011),Davison,
Dolukhanov, and Sarson (2009)).
A common feature of diffusion models is a concentric expansion from one
or multiple centers of supposed origins, with modifications introduced
to account for geographic bottlenecks, terrain, or rivers (Davison et
al. 2006,Patterson et al. (2010),Silva2014a). Fort (2012) and Fort
(2015) attempted to disentangle demic and cultural diffusion both from a
modeling as well as a data perspective. In a diffusion model, they found
that both demic and cultural diffusion are important, with demic
diffusion responsible for 60\% (vs.~40\% for cultural) of the spreading
process. Similarly, our own investigation (Lemmen, Gronenborn, and Wirtz
2011) concluded that a mixed model produces a pattern of Neolithization
best representing the data.
Much less numerical studies have been performed for Eurasian regions
outside Europe. The best investigated test case is probably South Asia
and the Indian subcontinent. For this region Ackland et al. (2007)
investigated the transition to agriculture as a diffusion process that
emanates from a single founder region in Southwest Asia; in contrast,
Patterson et al. (2010) reported on a simulation of the Neolithic
transition in India expanding from two centers, representing Chinese and
Harappan migration streams. Our own simulations for the Indian
subcontinent showed that the connection from the Indus region to the
Levante was only established after the transition to agropastoralism
(Lemmen and Khan 2012), consistent with the wheat/rice barrier
identified by (Barker 2006). The demic--cultural debate has not been
investigated for greater Eurasia yet.
In the current study, I demonstrate with numerical simulations how the
different assumptions about the diffusion process -interpreted as demic
diffusion and cultural diffusion or a mixture thereof- may have played
different roles in the spread of agropastoralism through Eurasia.
Emanating from founder regions in North and South China, Central Asia,
and the Levant about 9000 years ago, the entire continent (except
Northern Eurasia) transitions to agropastoral life styles by 3000~BC
drawing a complex picture of cultural and demic diffusion.
The goal of this study is to investigate qualitatively the spatial and
temporal predominance of either cultural or demic diffusion processes
within Eurasia, and to provide a novel visualization of the complexity
of the interplay between these processes at a continental scale.
\section{Methods}\label{methods}
I employ the Global Land Use and technological Evolution Simulator
(GLUES, Lemmen, Gronenborn, and Wirtz 2011)---a numerical model of
prehistoric innovation, demography, and subsistence economy---to
hindcast the regional transitions to agropastoralism and the diffusion
of people and innovations across Eurasia for the period 7500--3500~BC.
\begin{figure}[htbp]
\centering
\includegraphics{figure_1.pdf}
\caption{Geographic setting of 294 Eurasian and North African simulation
regions in the Global Land Use and technological Evolution Simulator.
This is a subset of the full (global) simulation comprising 685 world
regions. \label{fig:regions}}
\end{figure}
The model operates on 294 (country-like) spatial units within the domain
-15 \ensuremath{^\circ}{}E to 135 \ensuremath{^\circ}{}E and 10 \ensuremath{^\circ}{}N to 60 \ensuremath{^\circ}{}N (\hyperref[fig:regions]{Figure 1}).
These regions represent ecozones that have been derived to represent
homogenous net primary productivity (NPP) clusters based on a 3000~BC 1\ensuremath{^\circ}{}
x 1\ensuremath{^\circ}{} palaeoproductivity estimate (Wirtz and Lemmen 2003); this estimate
was derived from a dynamic palaeovegetation simulation (Brovkin,
Ganopolski, and Svirezhev 1997) scaled down with the New et al. (2001)
climatology. By using NPP, many of the environmental factors taken into
account by other expansion or predictive modesl, such as altitude,
latitude, rainfall, or temperature (e.g, Silva2014b, Arikan2014).
Within each region, a trait-based adaptive model describes regional
societies with three characteristics: intrinsic innovations
(technology), extrinsic (economic diversity), and subsistence style
(Lemmen, Gronenborn, and Wirtz 2011). The evolution of these
characteristic traits is interdependent and drives the growth of a
regional population according to the gradient adaptive dynamics approach
formulated by Wirtz and Eckhardt (1996) for ecological systems. In his
approach, the rate of change of the mean of each characteristic trait is
calculated as the product of the trait's variability and its marginal
growth benefit, i.e.~the derivative of population growth rate with
respect to the trait, evaluated at the mean growth rate. In Wirtz and
Lemmen (2003), we adopted this mathematical approach for social systems;
as the approach is an aggregate formulation operating on the statistical
moments of traits and growth rate, it requires large populations, and
thus larger geographic areas. For further details on the trait-based
model formulation, see Lemmen, Gronenborn, and Wirtz (2011) (their
supplementary online material).
Exchange of characteristic traits and migration of people between
regions is formulated with a diffusion-like approach, i.e., the flow of
a quantity (technology, economic diversity, subsistence style) is
directed from a region with higher influence (i.e.~product of technology
and population) to a region with lesser influence. The speed of the
spread is proportional to the interregional difference of the respective
quantity and of influence, is proportional to the influential region's
technology, and proportional to common boundary length divided by
interregional distance. Migration is furthermore dependent on acceptable
living conditions (positive growth rate) in the influenced region.
Equations for interregional interchange are given in the appendix. The
size of the simulation regions (on average 300000 km$^2$) is
insufficient for detailed local analyses, but appropriate for
subcontinental and continental-scale simulations and necessary to allow
for parameter space exploration.
We performed three different simulations, one with mixed diffusion, one
with exclusively demic diffusion and one with exclusively cultural
diffusion (see appendix for the different formulations). The global
simulations (in total 685 regions) are started at 8500~BC, assuming
equal initial conditions for all societies in all regions; we use the
same set of parameters that have been used by Lemmen, Gronenborn, and
Wirtz (2011): for the three diffusion scenarios, we obtained the
diffusion coefficients by tuning each model to optimally represent the
European arrival dates. Simulations were performed with GLUES version
1.1.20a; this version can be obtained as free and open source from
Despite tuning all scenarios to the radiocarbon record used in Lemmen,
Gronenborn, and Wirtz (2011), the highest correlation could only be
obtained with the mixed (base) scenario. To disentangle cultural and
demic diffusion processes, we compared the demic and cultural diffusion
scenarios with each other after normalization with the mixed scenario.
Where the demic scenario predicted at least a 10\% greater share of
agropastoral life style, we diagnosed a predominantly demic diffusion.
Where the cultural scenario predicted a greater share, we diagnosed a
predominantly cultural diffusion. To estimate the overall influence of
demic versus cultural diffusion, we averaged for each region the
relative predominance of demic over cultural diffusion processes over
time.
\section{Results}\label{results}
The timing of the arrival of agropastoralism
(\hyperref[fig:timeslices]{Figure 2}) reveals its multicentric origin
and spatiotemporal expansion, including the typical radiation from
founder regions seen in all diffusive models.
\begin{figure}[htbp]
\centering
\includegraphics{figure_2.pdf}
\caption{Simulated transition to agriculture, 6000-3500~BC. The darker
the shading, the higher the fraction of agropastoralists in the
population. Red lines show regional borders with demic diffusion events,
green lines show regional borders with cultural diffusion
events.\label{fig:timeslices}}
\end{figure}
By 6600~BC, the transition to agropastoralism has occurred in five
founder regions: (1) Northern coastal China, (2) Southern tropical
inland China, (3) Northern Indus region, (4) West Anatolia and Greece,
and (5) Zagros mountains. At this time, emerging agropastoralism
connects the Chinese regions with each other
(\hyperref[fig:timeslices]{Figure 2}). By 6300~BC, agropastoralism is
the dominant life style in all founder regions; it has expanded west to
the Balkans and Italy, and east to Korea. A broad band of
agriculturalists is visible across China.
By 6100~BC, the Levante and Anatolian founder regions connect and expand
north and eastward, likewise the Chinese regions. The Indus regions
extends towards the Ganges. These emerging life styles consolidate in
the ensuing centuries. By 5500~BC, the western Eurasion center has
continued to expand in all directions, reaching around the Black Sea and
to the Caspian Sea. All of China has transitioned Emerging
agropastoralism connects the Indus to the Chinese region. By 5100~BC,
North African pastoralism emerges. There is now one large Asian
agropastoralist region, also with emergent transitions throughout India.
By 4700 the Western and Eastern Eurasian center connect. Agropastoralism
emerges in Southeast Asia and Western Europe. By 4000~BC, one large belt
of agropastoral life style connects the Mediterranean with West Asia,
South Asia, and East Asia.
Multiple, intermittent, and recurrent predominantly demic or cultural
diffusion processes are seen throughout the simulation for all regions.
For example, exchange processes around the Central Asian plateau are
dominated by demic diffusion at all times. At most times, North African
and Southwest European exchange processes are dominated by demic
diffusion. Cultural diffusion, on the other hand, is at all times
dominant within east and south China, and in Southeast Asia. It is at
most times dominant on the Indian subcontinent.
A more complex pattern of demic and cultural diffusion in space and time
is observed in Western Asia and Southeast Europe. Diffusion from the
Fertile Crescent is predominantly demic before 4900~BC, and cultural
thereafter. Just east of the Red Sea, it is demic until 4200~BC, and
cultural from 4000~BC. The expansion of Southeastern and Anatolian
agropastoralism northward is predominantly cultural at 5500~BC, and
predominantly demic 500 years later. At 5000~BC, it is demic west of the
Black sea and cultural east of the Black Sea. The, at 4500~BC, demic
processes again take over part of the eastern Black Sea northward
expansion.
\begin{figure}[htbp]
\centering
\includegraphics{figure_3.pdf}
\caption{Time integrated contribution of predominantly demic (red) and
cultural (green) diffusion represented geographically (top panel) and as
a histogram (bottom panel). For most regions, no predominance (grey) of
either mechanism is found. \label{fig:demiccultural}}
\end{figure}
Integrated over time, both demic and diffusive processes are equally
relevant for most regions. No region, however, shows a demic
contribution of less than 30\%, and all regions have at least a cultural
contribution of more than 15\%. 90\% of all regions show no dominance of
either demic or cultural diffusion (\hyperref[fig:demiccultural]{Figure
3}). A dominance of demic diffusion is evident in the Sahara, and the
Hindukush and other regions around the Central Asian Plateau. Cultural
diffusion is persistent on the Arabian pensinsual, South and Southeast
Asia, and a several regions in southern Siberia and north of the Aral
Sea.
\section{Discussion}\label{discussion}
During each regional transition, both cultural and demic processes play
a role, often even contribute sequentially to a regional agropastoral
transition. In only very few regions, the simulated transition is best
explained by either demic or cultural diffusion processes. Previous
attempts to prove either demic or diffusion processes as solely
responsible for regional agropastoral conditions seem too short-fetched,
when the spatial and temporal interference of cultural and diffusive
processes might have left a complex imprint on the genetic, linguistic
and artifactual record.
In this respect, we confirm Ammerman and Cavalli-Sforza (1973)'s
suggestion and Fort (2012)'s analysis of a probably mixed process
underlying the expansion of agropastoralism and herding. The new finding
here is that for most regions within Eurasia both processes are active,
often contemporaneously, or subsequently, and that a time integrated
view (such as population genetic or linguistic analyses) only picks out
the few regions where either process dominates. For most regions,
however, all of the complex interplay between cultural and demic
diffusion is hidden in a time-integrated view.
This time-integrated view is, however, the only information that is
accessible from radiocarbon arrival date compilations and most model
simulations. Fort (2015), e.g., analysed the variations in diffusion
speeds and attributed these to predominant cultural, demic, or mixed
diffusion for slow, intermediate, and fast apparent diffusion rates,
respectively (Fort 2015). Theirs and our analysis indicate potentially
more demic exchange within Iberia and Northern Italy separated by
predominant cultural or mixed exchange in Southern France; at the coarse
scale of the model regions, however, this comparison should not be
expected to yield conclusive insights.
Based on this time-integrated view, ancient DNA work (e.g. Bramanti et
al. 2009), infers a demic signal throughout Europe. As time control is
difficult in this record, the demic signal might have occured before the
expansion of agropastoralists by migrations of Mesolithic
hunter-gatherers or horticulturalists, or even later. The Y-chromosomal
and the mitochondrial DNA data show different expansion patterns and can
be attributed to multiple migration events, including pre-Neolithic and
post-Neolithic demic events (Sz{é}cs{é}nyi-Nagy et al. 2014), although
most of the introduced variability in the European gene pool was well
established by the Bronze Age (Ricaut 2012).
Migration might have to be functionally disconnected from the spread of
agropastoralism (Gronenborn 2011). Our simulations show that it is not
necessarily only one migration wave and another cultural diffusion event
that shaped the expansion of agropastoralism, but a multitude of
combined events, sometimes more demic, some times more culturally
dominated. This two-faceted expansion process then explains both
archaeogenetic data as well as cultural diffusion evidence, without
requiring distinct migratory processes before the expansion of
agropastoralism.
In GLUES, I did not consider maritime migration, because the Iberian
arrival dates could largely be reconstructed without explicitly
including this process in the model because a secondary wave of advance
enters Iberia from Gibraltar (there are artificial land bridges
connecting across the strait of Gibraltar, Bosporus and the English
Channel to compensate for the lack of maritime transport), which
possibly emulates the fast leap-frog maritime that has been proposed for
that region {[}Battalia2008{]}. For the purpose of investigating
intracontinental diffusion processes in a compact land mass like
Eurasia, the addition of a coastal or sea-mediated additional spread is
not required.
The diachronic view of exchange processes presented here may help to
identify individual migration and cultural exchange processes better
than a time-integrated view. Thus, evidence of trade and exchange
between two cultural layers with genetic continuity does not necessarily
exclude demic diffusion during the entire period of interest, nor does a
different genetic signal imply that cultural diffusion did not take
place, or did not take place at other times.
Where do we see preferential cultural or demic diffusion in this study?
Very roughly, mountaineous regions seem to favour demic diffusion in the
model simulation when integrated over time
(\hyperref[fig:demiccultural]{Figure 3}). This is especially visible for
the Central Asian plateau and its ridges. The Alps, the Pyrenees, the
Iranian Plateau fit this pattern. Other important mountain regions, such
as Anatolia or the Indian Ghats do not exhibit preferential demic
diffusion.
Together with the apparent preferred demic diffusion is the western
Sahara this possibly gives a hint that a lack of local adoption (due to
environmental contraints) could be possible reason for slower or lesser
cultural diffusion. This does not explain, however, the preferential
cultural diffusion in the (also environmentally marginal) Arabian
peninsula. Clearly, more work both in situ and in silico has to be done
to explore the possibility of an environmental constraint selecting for
a specific diffusion process.
These simulations have been performed without being confronted with
sufficient regional archaeological data for most parts of Eurasia, and
the parameters values have been tuned to best reproducing the origin
locations and times of agropastoralism. Only European radiocarbon dates
were used to estimate the diffusion coefficients for the demic, cultural
and mixed diffusion scenarios (see appendix). One Eurasian region tested
for model skill is the Indus region (Lemmen and Khan 2012), and there
the model appears slightly too fast compared to the (often very
uncertain) dates; In a non-Eurasian study (Lemmen 2013) found that
radiocarbon dates for the transitory period 1000~BC--AD 1000 in Eastern
North America were successfully simulated, again with a small model bias
towards earlier dates.
The overall simulation for Eurasia is thus \emph{realistic} in the sense
of providing a consistent spatio-temporal view of one expectation of
prehistoric developments (from a Eurocentric view) at a large scale. The
results are not \emph{real} in the sense that they provide the exact
historical trajectory that has been found at the local scale (cmp
Ackland et al. 2007). The great challenge and promise arising from the
simulation is thus to confront the expectation from the model with the
realization in the archaeological record: only when both disagree can we
learn that either the model is not performing well enough, or that there
is a process that is emancipated from the environmental and cultural
context: then we have quantified human agency. The individual or
society-level decision to migrate or to communicate should be expected
to be at least as rich and complex as the cultural-demic diffusion
picture appearing from a simulation.
\section{Conclusion}\label{conclusion}
I presented a numerical simulation study on the diffusion processes
during the Neolithization in Eurasia, using an adaptive model of
prehistoric societies in their environmental context that is able to
resolve local innovation, cultural diffusion and demic diffusion.
Although a mixed diffusion process had been suggested already long ago,
the analysis of simulations with either cultural or demic diffusion, and
with mixed diffusion, reveals an even more complex spatio-temporal
pattern of the expansion of agropastoralism throughout Eurasia than has
previously been found: demic and cultural processes occur
contemporaneously, or multiple times iteratively or intermittently in
most regions of Eurasia. There is no simple demic or cultural
explanation, but a very complex and rich interplay of both processes in
time and space. The polarized debate of either demic or cultural
diffusion should give way to acknowledging again this more complex
picture and to study and appreciate the richness of mechanisms.
\section{Appendix}\label{appendix}
The diffusion process between a region $i$ another region in its
neighbourhood $j \in \mathcal{N}$ is realized with three diffusion
equations, representing communication, trade, and migration. Diffusion
depends on the influence difference (Renfrew and Level 1979), where
influence is defined as the product of population density $P$ and
technology $T$. The diffusion flux $f$ is proportional to the influence
difference relative to the average influence of regions $i,j$ times
geographically determined conductance between the two regions.
The entries for $c_{i,j}$ in the conductance matrix $\mathcal{C}$
between two regions $i,j$ are constructed from the common boundary
length $L_{i,j}$ divided by the mean area of the regions
$\sqrt{A_i A_j}$. As in Etten and Hijmans (2010), geographically not
connected regions have zero conductance; to connect across the Strait of
Gibraltar, the English Channel, and the Bosporus, the respective entries
in $\mathcal{C}$ were calculated as if a narrow land bridge connected
them.
No additional account is made for increased connectivity along rivers
(Davison et al. (2006), Silva and Steele (2014)), as the regional setup
of the model is biased (through the use of net primary productivity
(NPP) similarity clusters) toward elongating regions in the diretion of
rivers. Altitude and latitude effects are likewise implicitly accounted
for by the NPP clustering in the region generation.
Finally, if the flux between $i,j$ is negative, it is directed inward
from $j$ to $i$, else outward from $i$ to $j$.
\begin{equation}
f_{i,j} = c_{i,j} \left(\displaystyle{\frac{(P_i T_i A_i + P_j T_j A_j)}{A_i + A_j}}- P_j T_j\right).
\end{equation}
\textbf{Trade/information exchange}: Trait value differences in all
traits $X$ between $i$ and all its neighbours $j$ are summed and added
to region $i$'s trait value.
\begin{equation}
\left.\displaystyle{\frac{\mathrm{d}X_{i}}{\mathrm{d}t}}\right\vert_{\mathrm{trade}} =
\sigma_\mathrm{trade} \sum_{j\in\mathcal{N}_{i},f_{ij}>0} f_{ij}\cdot(X_{j}-X_{i})
\end{equation}
\noindent The parameter $\sigma_{\mathrm{trade}}$ needs to be estimated
(see below); trade is not mass-conserving.
\textbf{Migration} is composed of immigration or emigration, depending
on the sign of the diffusion flux $f$.
\begin{equation}
\left.\displaystyle{\frac{\mathrm{d}P_{i}}{\mathrm{d}t}}\right\vert_{\mathrm{demic}}
=\sigma_\mathrm{demic} \sum_{j\in\mathcal{N}_{i},f_{ij}>0} f_{ij}P_{j}\frac{A_{j}}{A_{i}}
- \sum_{j\in\mathcal{N}_{i},f_{ij}<0} f_{ij}P_{i}.
\end{equation}
\noindent The free parameter $\sigma_{\mathrm{demic}}$ can be chosen to
adjust the speed of migration (see below). Population is redistributed
by scaling with region area $A$, thus, migration is mass-conserving.
\textbf{Hitchhiking traits}: Whenever people move in a demic process,
they carry along their traits to the receiving region:
\begin{equation}
\left.\displaystyle{\frac{\mathrm{d}X_{i}}{\mathrm{d}t}}\right\vert_{\mathrm{demic}} =
\sigma_\mathrm{demic} \sum_{j\in\mathcal{N}_{i},f_{ij}>0} f_{ij}X_{j}\frac{P_{j}A_{j}}{P_{i}A_{i}}
\end{equation}
\subsection{Spread parameter
estimation}\label{spread-parameter-estimation}
Suitable values for the spread parameters are assessed after all other
model parameters have been fixed (for the equations and parameters not
directly relevant to the demic/diffusive analysis, see the supporting
online material provided as a supplement to Lemmen, Gronenborn, and
Wirtz (2011)).
We initially assume that information travels two orders of magnitude
faster than people, based on the typical size of exchange networks (1000
km, Mauvilly, Jeunesse, and Doppler (2008), Gronenborn (1999)), the
average active life time of a tradesperson (order 10 years), and the
comparison with the typical demic front speed of the order 1 km per year
(Ammerman and Cavalli-Sforza (1973)). Starting with this fixed relation
between $\sigma_\mathrm{trade}$ and $\sigma_\mathrm{demic}$, we vary
both parameters such the we get the highest correlation with the dataset
by Pinhasi, Fort, and Ammerman (2005) on European sites; with
$\sigma_\mathrm{trade}=0.2$ and $\sigma_\mathrm{trade}=0.002$ the
highest correlation achieved is $r^2=0.61$ ($n=631$, $p<0.01$). Analysis
of the simulation confirms that this is a parameterisation that
describes \textbf{mixed diffusion} (Lemmen, Gronenborn, and Wirtz
(2011), their figure 6).
For a purely \textbf{demic diffusion} model, trade was switched off
($\sigma_\mathrm{trade}=0$) and $\sigma_\mathrm{demic}$ was varied
(systematically increased) to again obtain the best correlation with the
data. The estimated parameter value is $\sigma_\mathrm{demic}=0.008$.
The respective procedure was applied to estimate the parameter
$\sigma_\mathrm{trade}$ for a purely \textbf{cultural diffusion}
best-fitting model; its value was determined to be $0.3$.
\section{References}\label{references}
\setlength{\parindent}{-0.2in} \setlength{\leftskip}{0.2in}
\setlength{\parskip}{8pt} \vspace*{-0.2in} \noindent
Ackland, Graeme J, Markus Signitzer, Kevin Stratford, and Morrel H
Cohen. 2007. ``Cultural Hitchhiking on the Wave of Advance of Beneficial
Technologies.'' \emph{Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.} 104(21):
8714--19.
Ammerman, A J, and Luigi Luca Cavalli-Sforza. 1973. ``A Population Model
for the Diffusion of Early Farming in Europe.'' In \emph{Explan. Cult.
Chang.}, ed. C Renfrew. London: Duckworth, 343--57.
Barker, Graeme. 2006. \emph{The Agricultural Revolution in Prehistory:
Why Did Foragers Become Farmers?} Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford
University Press.
Battaglia, Vincenza, Simona Fornario, Nadia Al-Zahery, Anna Olivieri,
Peter A Underhill, and Ornella Semino. 2008. ``Y-Chromosomal Evidence of
the Cultural Diffusion of Agriculture in Southeast Europe.'' \emph{Eur.
J. Hum. Genet.} (November): 1--11.
Bocquet-Appel, Jean-Pierre, Stephan Naji, Marc {Vander Linden}, and
Janusz Kozlowski. 2012. ``Understanding the Rates of Expansion of the
Farming System in Europe.'' \emph{J. Archaeol. Sci.} 39(2): 531--46.
Bramanti, Barbara, M G Thomas, Wolfgang Haak, M Unterlaender, P Jores, K
Tambets, I Antanaitis-Jacobs, M N Haidle, R Jankauskas, C-J Kind, F
Lueth, T Terberger, J Hiller, S Matsumura, P Forster, and J Burger.
2009. ``Genetic Discontinuity Between Local Hunter-Gatherers and Central
Europe's First Farmers.'' \emph{Science (80-. ).} 326(5949): 137--40.
Brovkin, Victor, Andrei Ganopolski, and Yuri Svirezhev. 1997. ``A
Continuous Climate-Vegetation Classification for Use in
Climate-Biosphere Studies.'' \emph{Ecol. Modell.} 101: 251--61.
Chikhi, Lounes, Richard A Nichols, Guido Barbujani, and Mark A Beaumont.
2002. ``Y Genetic Data Support the Neolithic Demic Diffusion Model.''
\emph{Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.} 99(17): 11008--13.
Childe, Vere Gordon. 1925. \emph{Dawn Of European Civilization}. 1st ed.
Routledge {[}reprinted 2005{]}.
Clark, J G D. 1965. ``Radiocarbon Dating and the Expansion of Farming
Culture from the Near East over Europe.'' \emph{Proc. Prehist. Soc.} 31:
57--73.
Davison, Kate, Pavel M Dolukhanov, and GR Sarson. 2009. ``Multiple
Sources of the European Neolithic: Mathematical Modelling Constrained by
Radiocarbon Dates.'' \emph{Quat. Int.} 44: 1--17.
Davison, Kate, Pavel M Dolukhanov, Graeme R. Sarson, and Anvar Shukurov.
2006. ``The Role of Waterways in the Spread of the Neolithic.'' \emph{J.
Archaeol. Sci.} 33(5): 641--52.
Deguilloux, Marie-France, Rachael Leahy, Marie-H{é}l{è}ne Pemonge, and
St{é}phane Rottier. 2012. ``European Neolithization and Ancient DNA: An
Assessment.'' \emph{Evol. Anthropol.} 21(1): 24--37.
Edmonson, Munro S. 1961. ``Neolithic Diffusion Rates.'' \emph{Curr.
Anthropol.} 2(2): 71--102.
Etten, Jacob van, and Robert J. Hijmans. 2010. ``A Geospatial Modelling
Approach Integrating Archaeobotany and Genetics to Trace the Origin and
Dispersal of Domesticated Plants.'' \emph{PLoS One} 5(8): e12060.
Fort, Joaquim. 2012. ``Synthesis Between Demic and Cultural Diffusion in
the Neolithic Transition in Europe.'' \emph{Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S.
A.} 109(46): 18669--73.
---------. 2015. ``Demic and Cultural Diffusion Propagated the Neolithic
Transition Across Different Regions of Europe.''
Fu, Qiaomei, Pavao Rudan, Svante P{ä}{ä}bo, and Johannes Krause. 2012.
``Complete Mitochondrial Genomes Reveal Neolithic Expansion into
Europe.'' \emph{PLoS One} 7(3): e32473.
Fuller, Dorian Q, Tim Denham, Manuel Arroyo-kalin, Leilani Lucas, Chris
J Stevens, Ling Qin, and Robin G Allaby. 2014. ``Convergent Evolution
and Parallelism in Plant Domestication Revealed by an Expanding
Archaeological Record.'' 111(17).
Galeta, Patrik, Vladim{í}r Sl{á}dek, Daniel Sosna, and Jaroslav Bruzek.
2011. ``Modeling Neolithic Dispersal in Central Europe: Demographic
Implications.'' \emph{Am. J. Phys. Anthropol.} 146(1): 104--15.
Gronenborn, Detlef. 1999. ``A Variation on a Basic Theme: The Transition
to Farming in Southern Central Europe.'' \emph{J. World Prehistory}
13(2): 123--210.
---------. 2011. ``Neolithic Western Temperate and Central Europe.'' In
\emph{Oxford Handb. Archae- Ology Anthropol. Hunt. Gatherers}, ed. M.
{Cummings, V., Jordan, P., Zvelebil}. Oxford University Press.
Haak, Wolfgang, Oleg Balanovsky, Juan J. Sanchez, Sergey Koshel, Valery
Zaporozhchenko, Christina J. Adler, Clio S. I. {Der Sarkissian}, Guido
Brandt, Carolin Schwarz, Nicole Nicklisch, Veit Dresely, Barbara
Fritsch, Elena Balanovska, Richard Villems, Harald Meller, Kurt W. Alt,
and Alan Cooper. 2010. ``Ancient DNA from European Early Neolithic
Farmers Reveals Their Near Eastern Affinities'' ed. David Penny.
\emph{PLoS Biol.} 8(11): e1000536.
Hodder, Ian. 1990. \emph{The Domestication of Europe. Structure and
Contingency in Neolithic Societies}. Oxford: Blackwell.
Lemmen, Carsten. 2013. ``Mechanisms Shaping the Transition to Farming in
Europe and the North American Woodland.'' \emph{Archaeol. Ethnol.
Anthropol. Eurasia} 41(3): 48--58.
Lemmen, Carsten, and Aurangzeb Khan. 2012. ``A Simulation of the
Neolithic Transition in the Indus Valley.'' In \emph{Clim. Landscapes,
Civilizations}, Geophysical Monograph Series, eds. Liviu Giosan, Dorian
Q Fuller, Kathleen Nicoll, Rowan K Flad, and Peter D Clift. Washington:
American Geophysical Union, 107--14.
Lemmen, Carsten, Detlef Gronenborn, and Kai W Wirtz. 2011. ``A
Simulation of the Neolithic Transition in Western Eurasia.'' \emph{J.
Archaeol. Sci.} 38(12): 3459--70.
Mauvilly, Michel, Christian Jeunesse, and Thomas Doppler. 2008. ``Ein
Tonstempel Aus Der Spätmesolithischen Fundstelle von Arconciel / La
Souche (Kanton Freiburg, Schweiz ).'' \emph{Quartär} 55: 151--57.
New, M, MC Todd, M Hulme, and P Jones. 2001. ``Precipitation
Measurements and Trends in the Twentieth Century.'' \emph{Int. J.
Climatol.} 21: 1899--1922.
Patterson, M. A., Graeme R. Sarson, H.C. Sarson, and Anvar Shukurov.
2010. ``Modelling the Neolithic Transition in a Heterogeneous
Environment.'' \emph{J. Archaeol. Sci.} 37(11): 2929--37.
Pinhasi, Ron, Joaquim Fort, and A J Ammerman. 2005. ``Tracing the Origin
and Spread of Agriculture in Europe.'' \emph{Public Libr. Sci. Biol.}
3(12): e410.
Renfrew, Colin, and E V Level. 1979. ``Exploring Dominance: Predicting
Polities from Centers.'' In \emph{Transform. Math. Approaches to Cult.
Chang.}, eds. Colin Renfrew and K Cooke. New York: Academic Press,
145--66.
Renfrew, Colin, ed. 1987. ``Archaeology and Language. The Puzzle of
Indo-European Origins.'': 346.
Ricaut, Fran{ç}ois-Xavier. 2012. ``A Time Series of Prehistoric
Mitochondrial DNA Reveals Western European Genetic Diversity Was Largely
Established by the Bronze Age.'' \emph{Adv. Anthropol.} 02(01): 14--23.
Rowley-Conwy, Peter. 2004. ``How the West Was Lost.'' \emph{Curr.
Anthropol.} 45(October): 83--113.
Silva, Fabio, and James Steele. 2014. ``New Methods for Reconstructing
Geographical Effects on Dispersal Rates and Routes from Large-Scale
Radiocarbon Databases.'' \emph{J. Archaeol. Sci.} 52: 609--20.
Sz{é}cs{é}nyi-Nagy, Anna, Guido Brandt, Victoria Keerl, J{á}nos Jakucs,
Wolfgang Haak, Marc Fecher, Sabine Moeller-Rieker, Kitti K{ö}hler,
Bal{á}zs Guszt{á}v Mende, Kriszti{á}n Oross, Tibor Marton, Anett
Oszt{á}s, Vikt{ó}ria Kiss, Gy{ö}rgy P{á}lfy, Erika Moln{á}r, P{á}l
Raczky, Alexandra Anders, Katalin Sebők, Andr{á}s Czene, Roz{á}lia
Kust{á}r, Tibor Paluch, Krisztina Somogyi, Mario {Š}laus, Martin Novak,
Zsuzsanna Zoffmann, G{á}bor T{ó}th, Brigitta Ősz, Vanda Voicsek, Eszter
B{á}nffy, and Kurt W. Alt. 2014. ``Tracing the Genetic Orgigin of
Europe's First Farmers Reveals Insights into Their Social Structure.''
Wirtz, Kai W, and Bruno Eckhardt. 1996. ``Effective Variables in
Ecosystem Models with an Application to Phytoplankton Succession.''
\emph{Ecol. Modell.} 92(1): 33--53.
Wirtz, Kai W, and Carsten Lemmen. 2003. ``A Global Dynamic Model for the
Neolithic Transition.'' \emph{Clim. Change} 59(3): 333--67.
Zvelebil, Marek. 1998. ``What's in a Name: The Mesolithic, the
Neolithic, and Social Change at the Mesolithic-Neolithic Transition.''
In \emph{Underst. Neolit. North-Western Eur.}, ed. C {Edmonds, M,
Richards}. Glasgow: Cruithne Press, 1--36.
\ifreview\else\end{twocolumn}\fi
\end{document}
|
\section{Introduction} \label{sec:Intro}
The U.S. Department of Transportation announced that connected road vehicles will be mandated by 2017~\cite{nhtsa}. As such, wireless communication technologies have been studied in order to enable reliable connected vehicles across any of operating conditions. One promising solution is vehicular ad hoc networks (VANETs), which has been actively studied over past several decades\bengi{~\cite{campolo15,campolo15_2, chen15}}. The key building block for enabling many safety applications in VANETs is cooperative awareness. The main premise for cooperative awareness is that by knowing their operating environment, vehicles and their drivers are going to be better equipped for decision-making in hazardous situations (\textit{e.g.}, emergency braking) and more adept at finding better routes to their destination (\textit{e.g.}, avoiding congested roads). To enable cooperative awareness, vehicles use periodic message exchanges (also referred to as ``beaconing'') in order to exchange position, speed, heading, and other vital information that makes the vehicles aware of their surroundings. Such cooperative awareness is used to enable safety applications, such as intersection collision warning, accident warning, and emergency braking~\cite{etsi09}. Since they are sent periodically by all vehicles, beacons are envisioned to occupy a large proportion of the channel time~\cite{etsi14TR101612}. Decentralized Congestion Control (DCC) algorithms can be used to control the number of beacons and other messages transmitted across the channel. Typically, DCC approaches in VANETs are classified as: 1) rate control; 2) power control; and 3) combined rate and power control. Rate control algorithms adapt the message rate, \textit{i.e.} number of packets per unit time that a vehicle can transmit, where the rate is often adapted based on the channel load information. Power adaptation algorithms use transmit power control to limit the range over which a message is broadcast, thus effectively controlling the channel load. Combined algorithms employ the previous two types of control by applying both rate control to reduce the number of messages and power control to limit their range.
In recent years, there have been a number of works on DCC approaches proposed for VANETs. Since the standardization of DCC is vital for interoperability and performance of vehicle-to-X (V2X) communications, there continues to be ongoing research on DCC in various standardization bodies and special interests consortia (\textit{e.g.}, within European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI) and as part of the Car-to-Car Communications Consortium) aimed at performance evaluation and providing a unified cross-layer DCC framework~\bengi{\cite{etsi14TR101612, puthalIccve13, zemouriItsc14, shagdar15, sepulcre11}}. One example of a metric that is often used is the channel busy ratio (CBR), defined as the proportion of channel time that is deemed occupied by an ongoing transmission. Bansal \textit{et al.} devised an algorithm called the LInear MEssage Rate Integrated Control (LIMERIC)~\cite{bansal}, a rate control algorithm that adapts the message rate by using CBR measurements in a linear manner (\textit{e.g.}, proportional to the change of CBR). The authors prove that the convergence of LIMERIC yields fair and efficient channel utilization. Tielert \textit{et al.}~\cite{tielert} proposed an algorithm called PULSAR (Periodically Updated Load Sensitive Adaptive Rate control), which uses piggybacked two-hop CBR information and additive increase multiplicative decrease method (AIMD) in order to achieve better channel utilization and max-min fairness. The approaches described above used linear rate adaptation. A simpler approach to rate control is to increase/decrease the rate based on, for example, the CBR being above or below a preset threshold. This approach is frequently referred to as binary rate control. One example of a binary rate control algorithm is Context-Aware Rate Selection (CARS) by Shankar \textit{et al.}~\cite{shankar08}. Egea-Lopez and Pavon-Marino~\cite{egea2014distributed} reformulated the congestion control problem as a network utility maximization problem and design fair adaptive beaconing rate for intervehicular communications (FABRIC), a proportionally fair binary rate control algorithm. \bengi{The required message rate may change depending on the situation. To deal with these differences, Joerer \textit{et al.}~\cite{joerer15} perform rate adaptation by considering the context.}
Power adaptation algorithms use transmit power control to limit the range over which a message is broadcasted, thus effectively controlling the channel load. Torrent-Moreno \textit{et al.}~\cite{moreno09} designed a power control algorithm aimed at ensuring bandwidth allocation for high-priority event-based messages (\textit{e.g.}, for safety applications), whereas Mittag \textit{et al.}~\cite{mittag2008} elaborated on the same algorithm by introducing segment-based power control with the goal of reducing overhead. By testing the solution on homogeneous vehicular traffic densities and imperfect channel information, the authors demonstrated the effectiveness of their algorithm. Caizzone \textit{et al.}~\cite{caizzone} proposed an algorithm that adapts transmit power depending on the number of neighbors, where the transmit power is increased in case the number of neighbors is under the threshold or \textit{vice versa}. Regarding combined power and rate adaptation algorithms, Le \textit{et al.}~\cite{le2011performance} evaluated rate-only, power-only, and combined rate and power control algorithms. By performing extensive simulations, the authors identified which of the algorithms is preferable for a specific scenario and application requirement. \bengi{Kloiber \textit{et al.}~\cite{kloiber16} introduced a random transmission power assignment in order to make correlated packet collisions more uncorrelated in space. Authors in~\cite{gomez16, math15, marzouk15} define DCC problem as a state machine to perform transmission power control.} Khorakhun \textit{et al.}~\cite{khorakhun2008} combined the binary rate adaptation with transmit power control, where the increase/decrease of transmit power is defined with a parameter chosen based on CBR. Tielert \textit{et al.}~\cite{tielert13} adapted the transmit power and rate with respect to the target transmission distance and channel conditions by using Pareto optimal parameter combinations. The authors point out that there is a need for further study involving variable channel conditions, including dynamic transitions between line-of-sight (LOS) and non-LOS conditions, which was experimentally shown to have a profound impact on communication performance, and with significant real-world effect on congestion control algorithms~\cite{schmidt11}.
Since congestion control is inherently a cross-layer issue, with the need for implicit or explicit coordination between applications, transport-, network-, and access-layer algorithms, there have been studies looking at the cross-layer congestion control (\textit{e.g.}, Kovacs \textit{et al.}~\cite{kovacs2008} and ETSI specialist task force work on cross-layer DCC~\cite{etsi14TR101612}). In terms of using awareness to adjust the parameters (power and rate) of congestion control algorithms, Gozalvez and Sepulcre propose OPRAM~\cite{gozalvez2008channel}, an opportunistic transmission power control algorithm that increases the transmit power of messages in critical situations (\textit{e.g.}, before intersections). However, in order to function properly, apart from precise location information, such as from GPS transmissions, OPRAM requires \textit{a priori} knowledge about geographical regions that are accident-prone. Kloiber \textit{et al.}~\cite{kloiber2012dice,kloiber15} used awareness quality as a metric and employ a random transmit power for messages with a goal of reducing interference. Huang \textit{et al.}~\cite{huang10} perform power and rate adaptation mechanisms independently, whereas the proposed mechanism, environment-and context-aware combined power and rate (ECPR), proactively considers the effect of power adaptation on rate adaptation and \textit{vice versa} such that it can adapt the mechanisms more efficiently at the next calculation step. Another difference is that Huang \textit{et al.} perform rate adaptation based on potential tracking error resulting from the difference between actual and estimated states. This approach might be challenging to use in practice since it is hard to precisely obtain the actual state at each algorithm step. ECPR performs rate adaptation based on the channel utilization limit defined in the standards. Sepulcre \textit{et al.}~\bengi{\cite{sepulcre16}} proposes the integration of congestion and awareness control (INTERN), which adjusts transmit power based on the prevailing application context (target dissemination distance set by applications) alone, without considering the surrounding environment. Countless measurement studies have shown that the surroundings and vehicle traffic significantly affect the range, thus making it difficult to separate the target application range from the propagation environment restrictions. \bengi{Frigau \textit{et al.}~\cite{frigau15} control the transmission range using the transmission power as well as beacon generation range based on beacon reception rate. Nasiriani \textit{et al.}~\cite{nasiriani13} perform similar power control mechanism and combine it with rate control based on channel utilization. Jose \textit{et al.}~\cite{jose15} defines power adaptation as a joint Lagrangian optimization and rate adaptation. These approaches as well as~\cite{zemouri14} combine power and rate adaptation without their combined operation. However, the value that power control decides may cause a negative effect on message rate control mechanism, and vice versa.}
In order to enable safe and efficient cooperative vehicular communications, several technical challenges associated with VANETs include the following:
\begin{itemize}
\item Diverse interference caused by the other networks decreases vehicles communication efficiency.
\item Beacons and other messages cause increased overhead across the control channels.
\item Dynamic environments need various control mechanisms. For example, if the message rate is fixed to a low value, this causes underutilization in low density environments. Conversely, if the message rate is set to a high value, the vehicles may overload the channel in high density traffic scenarios, thus causing collisions.
\item Each vehicle can have its own target awareness distance and target message rate. However, the current state-of-the-art does not provide a practical solution for both distributed and coherent adaptation.
\end{itemize}
In this paper, we propose a transmit power control approach designed to achieve cooperative neighborhood awareness for vehicles, while the rate control is subsequently employed to utilize the available resources. Specifically, we propose an algorithm called ECPR (Environment- and Context-aware Combined Power and Rate Distributed Congestion Control for Vehicular Communication), which is a combined power and rate control DCC algorithm that aims to improve the cooperative awareness for challenging environments, while at the same time increasing the message rate when the environment and application requirements\footnote{We use the term ``application requirements" to encompass the effects that determine the rate and awareness requirements for a vehicle (\textit{e.g.}, speed, traffic conditions, and currently active application).} permits. To comply with target channel load/capacity requirements, ECPR employs an adaptive rate control algorithm. In this work, we use LIMERIC~\cite{bansal}, a state-of-the-art adaptive rate control algorithm, although other adaptive rate control algorithms could serve the same purpose. We performed simulations with ECPR in an experimentally validated simulation tool~\cite{boban14TVT} and showed that it can provide gains in terms of awareness or throughput in realistic propagation environments. \bengi{The proposed mechanism is briefly presented in ETSI 101 613~\cite{etsi101613}.}
Compared to current state-of-the-art, the main contributions of our work are:
\begin{itemize}
\item A practical algorithm to incorporate awareness -- a key building block for VANET applications -- as a core metric for congestion control in VANETs. ECPR proactively considers the effect of power adaptation on rate adaptation and \textit{vice versa}, so that it can adapt the mechanisms more efficiently at the next algorithm step.
\item By adjusting the transmit power based on the awareness criterion, we enable: i) congestion control adaptation to the dynamic propagation environment surrounding vehicles; and ii) effective adaptation of cooperative awareness range based on the application context, including requirements of different safety and non-safety applications, speed of vehicles, and different traffic conditions per direction.
\item By combining rate and awareness control, the proposed algorithm can achieve one of the following goals: i) improved channel utilization (in terms of the overall number of messages exchanged) for a given awareness rate; or ii) improved cooperative awareness for a given channel utilization;
\end{itemize}
We perform extensive simulations including both realistic propagation and environment modeling (\textit{e.g.} large- and small-scale fading parameters, dynamic transitions between LOS and non-LOS links based on real building and vehicle locations) as well as realistic vehicle contexts (varying demand on both awareness by range and rate). We show that ECPR increases awareness by up to $20\%$ while keeping the channel load within reasonable bounds and interference at almost the same level. When the target awareness distance permits it, our proposed algorithm improves the average message rate by approximately 18\%, while keeping the target awareness.
\begin{figure}[!t]
\centerline{\includegraphics[width=0.85\textwidth]{SystArchUrban2.pdf}}
\caption{An example of how environment shapes the awareness range. Due to the particular environment layout, with buildings surrounding the intersection, if it is using fixed transmit power, vehicle X is likely to inform the vehicles on the same road of its existence, with a limited awareness of vehicles on the perpendicular road, up until X is in the intersection, at which point vehicles on both roads are likely to be aware of it. However, for active safety applications, awareness of vehicles on perpendicular road is more valuable than that on the same road, since the drivers of those vehicles cannot see vehicle X. Thus, for most VANET applications, \bengi{it is assumed that} the target awareness/communication range is a circular shape (or as circular as possible) of certain radius. Achieving such range in different environments requires power control. Lower part of the figure shows an idealized transmit power profile to adapt to the intersection environment for vehicle X as it travels through the intersection.} \label{SysArchUrban}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure}[!t]
\centerline{\includegraphics[width=0.85\textwidth]{SystArchHway.eps}}
\caption{Depending on the application context, which includes the speed of the vehicle, traffic context and the type of currently active application~\cite{etsi10_2}, vehicles can have different target awareness ranges. For example, vehicle Y can be going at a lower speed than vehicle Z, in which case it might require smaller awareness range. Similarly, vehicle Z might be executing a safety-critical application (\textit{e.g.}, emergency vehicle notification), in which case it requires larger awareness range} \label{SysArchHway}
\end{figure}
The rest of the paper is organized as follows: In Section~\ref{Network Architecture}, we describe the problem, provide several real-world scenarios, and define the metrics for evaluation of DCC algorithms. In Section~\ref{Algorithm}, we describe our proposed DCC approach. In Section~\ref{Experiment Results}, we discuss experiment results, and several concluding remarks are made in Section~\ref{Conclusion}.
\section{Environment- and Application Context-aware Congestion Control}\label{Network Architecture}
The work presented in this paper aims at designing a novel DCC solution for V2V communication that can satisfy the target awareness levels for different application contexts in different realistic propagation environments. As noted earlier, cooperative awareness is vital for VANETs since many applications need to be aware of neighboring vehicles to trigger the correct type of action for avoidance of hazardous situations (\textit{e.g.}, accident prevention). To that end, in this section we discuss the main design goals for DCC algorithm and introduce metrics we use for evaluation of the algorithms.
\subsection{Design goals}
To obtain acceptable performance in terms of cooperative awareness, DCC algorithms need to take into account the following aspects:
\begin{itemize}
\item Application context, determined by vehicular traffic conditions and application constraints, yields the requirements in terms of rate (amount of data) and communication and awareness range. Based on the application context, the DCC algorithm needs to distribute the available channel resources in a fair way (fair both in terms of achieved awareness and rate).
\item Due to varying vehicular traffic density and mobility, the network topology is highly dynamic and depends on the time of day, type of road and other features~\cite{aygun14,viriyasitava15}. The DCC algorithm needs to be adaptive with respect to network dynamics at a rate higher than the rate of change of network.
\item The propagation environment where vehicular communication occurs can be highly varying, even within a relatively small area. Environment characteristics of urban, suburban and rural areas create different challenges for congestion control and awareness~\cite{boban14vnc}. The environment creates effects similar on network topology to that of varying traffic density and mobility, albeit with geographically constrained dynamics.
\item In addition to the effect of static objects near the road, surrounding vehicles also introduce significant variation in the reception probability and network topology. Depending on vehicle size, a vehicle can completely block the communication between two other vehicles~\cite{abbas12}. Hence, a vehicle on a highway with dense traffic (\textit{e.g.}, morning rush hour) will have larger number of neighbors and a limited communication range due to the obstruction by surrounding vehicles; on the same highway during late of night, a vehicle will have fewer neighbors and an increased range. The DCC algorithm should be able to adapt to such variations.
\item Electromagnetic emission regulations, limited channel resources, and potentially high number of communicating entities (including vehicles and roadside units) create practical limits on the ability to control the power and rate parameters.
\end{itemize}
Figure~\ref{SysArchUrban} shows how the physical environment affects the awareness range \bengi{\cite{sommer13}}, whereas Figure~\ref{SysArchHway} shows how the application context requirements affect the target awareness range. In reality, there will exist numerous scenarios where the effects of the environment and application context will be combined, with the applications setting the awareness and rate requirements and the environment shaping the awareness range. Our goal in this study is to design a DCC solution that can efficiently support the functioning of safety and non-safety applications in diverse and dynamic VANET scenarios.
\subsection{Metrics}\label{subsec:Metrics}
One of the main goals of cooperative awareness is to enable drivers/vehicles to enhance their knowledge of the environment in order to augment the information that they can obtain visually. To that end, cooperative message exchange mechanisms need to ensure that vehicles are aware of other relevant vehicles within the same geographical proximity, including those that are in non-LOS conditions. However, achieving this goal efficiently is a challenge since environments where vehicular communication occurs are quite diverse. For example, the transmit power required to send a message to a vehicle in an open environment (\textit{e.g.}, highway scenario) at a certain distance will likely be much lower than the power required to send a message to a vehicle at the same distance in a non-LOS environment (\textit{e.g.}, urban scenario) as shown in Figure~\ref{fig:NARMeasurements}.
\begin{figure}[t!]
\vspace{-50pt}
\begin{center}
\subfigure[\scriptsize Highway.]{\label{fig:NARFH}\includegraphics[height=0.3\textwidth]{NARoverallHwy.eps}}\hspace{1mm}
\subfigure[\scriptsize Urban.]{\label{fig:NARFU}\includegraphics[height=0.3\textwidth]{NARoverallUrb.eps}}\hspace{1mm}
\caption{Measurements of NAR in Tampere, Finland. Measurements in both environments were collected using in the same measurement run based on the same vehicles, fixed transmit power, and 10 cooperative messages sent per second~\cite{boban14vnc}. }
\label{fig:NARMeasurements}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
To evaluate cooperative awareness in vehicular environments, we use two metrics introduced in previous work~\cite{boban14vnc}: Neighborhood Awareness Ratio (NAR) and Ratio of Neighbors Above Range (RNAR). For completeness, we define these metrics as follows:
\begin{itemize}
\item\textbf{\textit{NAR}}: The proportion of vehicles in a specific range from which a message was received in a defined time interval. Formally, for vehicle $i$, range $r$, and time interval $t$, $NAR_{i,r,t} = \frac{ND_{i,r,t}}{NT_{i,r,t}}$, where $ND_{i,r,t}$ is the number of vehicles within $r$ around $i$ from which $i$ received a message in $t$ and $NT_{i,r,t}$ is the total number of vehicles within $r$ around $i$ in $t$ (we use $t$=1 second). This metric measures the ability of cooperative message exchange to fulfill its purpose: enable cooperative awareness.
\item \textbf{\textit{RNAR}}: For a vehicle $i$, range $r$, and time interval $t$, the ratio of neighbors that are above a certain distance from the observed vehicle $RNAR_{i,r,t} = \frac{NA_{i,r,t}}{N_{i,t}}$, where $NA_{i,r,t}$ is the number of vehicles above $r$ from which $i$ received a message in $t$ (again, we use $t$=1 second) and $N_{i,t}$ is the total number of vehicles from which $i$ received a message in $t$ (irrespective of $r$). This metric gives an indication of potentially unnecessary traffic overheard from distant neighbors (\textit{i.e.}, those that are not relevant for current application context). Once the technology is deployed at a large scale (\textit{i.e.}, with communication equipment installed in most vehicles), such traffic will translate to unwanted interference.
\end{itemize}
In addition to NAR and RNAR, we also analyze the the performance of DCC in terms of the following metrics.
\begin{itemize}
\item \textbf{\textit{Average Message Rate}} shows the number of messages that a vehicle can transmit per second, averaged over all vehicles for a given second.
\item \textbf{\textit{Average Transmit Power}} shows the average transmit power messages that a vehicle transmits, averaged over all vehicles for a given second.
\item \textbf{\textit{Channel Busy Ratio (CBR)}} is defined as the proportion of channel time where the energy measured on the channel is above the Clear Channel Assessment (CCA) threshold.
\end{itemize}
\section{Proposed ECPR Algorithm}
\label{Algorithm}
In this section, we describe the proposed ECPR (Environment- and Con--text-aware Combined Power and Rate Distributed Congestion Control) algorithm. The goal of ECPR is to satisfy the requirements of target awareness levels for different application contexts in different realistic propagation environments, along with utilizing the available channel resources. Due to possibly different application contexts and environments, the vehicles will have different target awareness ranges and different target rates. To that end, ECPR uses power to control awareness range (distance) for the vehicles, whereas it uses rate to utilize the channel resources as allowed by the awareness requirements. In other words, ECPR attempts to satisfy the awareness requirements, at the same time maximizing the rate of messages through rate control. If the vehicles require low rates in order to not overload the channel, ECPR will set the transmit power of the vehicles to a maximum value. However, when the channel load increases (either due to higher rate requirements or due to an increased number of vehicles), ECPR is able to reduce the power in order to support such scenarios by considering the awareness requirement. Below we explain how power and rate control components are implemented, along with the way they are combined to reach the abovementioned goals.
\subsection{Power Adaptation for Awareness Control}
\label{Power Adaptation}
The power adaptation component of ECPR adapts the transmit power based on the current target awareness range set by the application context. ECPR is capable of adapting to dynamic scenarios with varying application contexts and in different environments without requiring \textit{explicit knowledge about the surroundings}, such as map information. To do so, it needs to estimate the channel \bengi{path loss} for all vehicles from which a message has been received the past time segment \textit{t}. Consequently, each vehicle requires knowledge of the transmit power level of the messages sent from each of its neighbors. The value of neighbor's transmit power information can be transmitted in the form of an integer value (e.g., between 0 and 33 dBm), which can be piggybacked in the transmitted messages (\textit{e.g.}, in cooperative awareness messages or in data packets).
To adjust the transmit power in order to meet the awareness requirement, ECPR use Path Loss Exponent (PLE) estimation. The transmit power adaptation algorithm is described as follows:
\begin{itemize}
\item \textbf{Define:} \textit{Ego vehicle:}The vehicle that is currently estimating its DCC parameters;\\
\indent{\hspace{40pt}\textit{Neighbor:} Vehicle from which ego vehicle received a message within time segment $[t-1,t]$ \bengi{sec}}
\item \textbf{Given:} Ego vehicles' transmit power at time $t$: $P_e^{Tx}(t)$; \\
\indent{\hspace{40pt}$i^{th}$ neighbor's transmit power at time $t$: $P_{i}^{Tx}(t)$, where $i = 1,..., N$ ($N:$ \bengi{Known number of neighbors within range});} \\
\indent{\hspace{40pt}Target awareness range of ego vehicle $r_e(t)$;} \\
\indent{\hspace{40pt}Target awareness percentage of ego vehicle within $r_e(t)$ \bengi{(Target NAR described in Section~\ref{subsec:Metrics})} : $TA_e(t)$}
\item For each received message, calculate $d_{ij}(t)$, distance between ego vehicle and $i^{th}$ neighbor at time $t$ when message $j$ was received
\item Select neighbors that are within target awareness range $r_e(t)$; select messages which are received from neighbors within $r_e(t)$
\item Compute $PLE_{ij}(t)$ (PLE for message $j$ from neighbor $i$) by using log-distance path loss as per~\cite{rappaport96}:
\bengi{
\begin{align}
PLE_{ij} (t) =\frac{PL_{ij} (t)}{10\log_{10}\left(\frac{4 \pi}{\lambda}d_{ij}(t)\right)},
\end{align}
where $\lambda$ the signal wavelength} and $PL_{ij}(t)$ is the path loss for message $j$ of neighbor $i$:
\begin{align}
PL_{ij}(t) =P_{i}^{Tx}(t) - P_{ij}^{Rx}(t),
\end{align}
where $P_{i}^{Tx}(t)$ and $P_{ij}^{Rx}(t)$ are the transmit (Tx) of neighbor $i$ and receive (Rx) power of $j^{th}$ message from neighbor $i$, respectively.
\item Calculate ego's nodes transmit power required to reach $i^{th}$ neighbor for next time step, $P_{e\rightarrow{i}}^{Tx} (t+1)$, using
$PLE_{ij} (t)$ and calculating the mean transmit power required for messages received from $i^{th}$ neighbor (with the mean over messages taken so as to counter the effects of fading):
\bengi{
\begin{align}
P_{e\rightarrow{i}}^{Tx} (t+1) = \frac{1}{m}\sum_{j=1}^m P_{ij}^{Rx} (t) + 10 PLE_{ij} (t) \log_{10}\left(\frac{4 \pi}{\lambda}r_e(t)\right).
\end{align}
}
\item Set ego node's transmit power for next time step ($t+1$) by considering the target awareness distance $r_e(t)$ and target awareness percentage $TA_e(t)$, provided as input of the application context. Sort the required transmit power to each neighbor and select $TA_e(t)$-th percentile transmit power:
\begin{align}
& {P\_sorted}_e^{Tx} = sort_{i=1}^N(P_{e\rightarrow{i}}^{Tx} (t+1)),\\
&P_e^{Tx} (t+1) = {P\_sorted}_e^{Tx} [round(TA_e(t)*N)].
\end{align}
\end{itemize}
Implicitly, by estimating the PLE from the received messages to adjust the transmit power, ECPR estimates what are the ``worst'' channels with \textit{all} vehicles within the awareness range $r_e$ (\textit{i.e.}, not only those from which a vehicle received messages correctly). By receiving messages from enough neighbors, ECPR gets an idea at what transmit power messages need to be sent at in order to reach the vehicles in $r_e$. In other words, by using PLE estimation, ECPR attempts to reach even those vehicles from which the ego vehicle has not yet received a message. \bengi{As long as the received power is higher than carrier sensing threshold, the transmit power at the next time step to the corresponding neighbor can be estimated. For the extreme cases such as very large path loss with a short distance, probably more than one neighbor will suffer from large path loss issue in the current environment. In that case, ECPR calculates Equation 4-5 and keep the transmit power high to reach the target awareness. The frame error level (less than $<5\%$) is neglected since there is not a significant impact on performance. It will be shown in Section~\ref{Experiment Results} that ECPR is a robust adaptation mechanism even in situations with significant MAC layer collisions.}
\subsection{Rate Adaptation}
\label{Rate Adaptation}
In this work, we employ the LInear MEssage Rate Integrated Control (LIMERIC) algorithm~\cite{bansal} to perform the rate adaptation aspect of ECPR due to its ability to converge to a fair and efficient channel utilization.\footnote{We note that ECPR is capable of performing combined adaptation for congestion control with other adaptive rate control algorithms.} LIMERIC takes the current channel busy ratio (CBR) and the current beacon rate as an input to the rate adaptation algorithm. The next beacon rate is adjusted to keep the current CBR under the threshold CBR, which is set to $0.6$ in this paper~\cite{etsi14TR101612}. The next message rate ($R_j(t)$) adaptation is done by Monte Carlo iteration at each ego node as defined below:
\begin{align}
R_j(t) = &(1-\alpha)R(t)(t-1) + sign(R_g- R_c(t-1))*\\ \nonumber
&min[X,\beta*|R_g-R_c(t-1)|],
\label{eq:Limeric}
\end{align}
where $R_c$ is the message rate, $\alpha$ and $\beta$ are the convergence parameters, and $R_g$ is target rate which satisfies the threshold CBR. For a detailed description of LIMERIC, we refer the reader to Bansal \textit{et al.}~\cite{bansal}.
Recent measurement-based studies showed that message exchanges in vehicular environments are dominated by shadowing scenarios (\textit{i.e.}, obstruction by buildings, vehicles), where messages are both received and lost in bursts depending on the channel quality~\cite{wangsimulating14,boban14vnc}. This implies that sending fewer high-power messages in non-LOS scenarios have a better chance of creating awareness between vehicles than sending multiple successive messages at a lower transmit power. However, the current state-of-the-art with respect to DCC algorithms do not provision for making sure that the hard-to-reach vehicles are informed via cooperative awareness message exchange. Furthermore, depending on the speed of the vehicle, the type of traffic context (\textit{e.g.}, congested highway, busy or empty intersection) and the type of active application~\cite{etsi10_2}, target regions of interest (which directly translates into awareness range) can vary for different vehicles. Rate-control-only algorithms, which are proposed for the initial iteration of V2X systems~\cite{etsi14TR101612}, cannot accommodate for different awareness ranges.
\subsection{Combining power and rate control}
\begin{table}[t!]
\caption{Parameters used in the proposed algorithm}
\footnotesize
\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{ l | l }
\hline
\textbf{Parameter} & \textbf{Definition}\\
\hline
$t$ & Time (sec)\\ \hline
$r_e(t)$ & Target awareness range at time $t$ (m)\\\hline
\multirow{2}{*}{$P_{i}^{Tx}$} & Transmit Power of j'th message from neighbor i\\
& within $r_e(t)$ (dBm)\\ \hline
$P_{ij}^{Rx}$ & Rx Power of j'th message from neighbor i within $r_e(t)$ (dBm)\\ \hline
\multirow{2}{*}{$d_{ij}(t)$} & $i^{th}$ neighbor's distance within $r_e(t)$ at time $t$ \\
&when receiving message j (m)\\ \hline
$DefaultTxPwr$ & Default transmit power (dBm)\\ \hline
$TA_e(t)$ &Target awareness of ego node at time $t$ (no unit)\\ \hline
$CBR(t)$ & Channel Busy Rate at time $t$ (no unit)\\ \hline
$lm_j$ &Length of the $j$'th message received by ego vehicle (byte/sec) \\ \hline
$C$ & Capacity of channel in terms of time (byte/sec)\\ \hline
$a = 0.1$, $b =1/150$ & LIMERIC parameters (see eq.~\ref{eq:Limeric}) (no unit)\\ \hline
$CBR_{Th}$ & Threshold CBR (no unit)\\ \hline
$\delta_A$ & Difference between target and actual awareness (no unit)\\ \hline
$eNAR(t)$ & Estimated Neighbor Awareness Ratio at time $t$ (no unit)\\ \hline
\multirow{2}{*}{$\delta_R$} &The ratio of the difference between\\
& target and actual rate to target rate (no unit)\\ \hline
$TR(t)$ & Target message rate at time $t$ (Hz)\\ \hline
$BR(t)$ & Message rate at time $t$ (Hz) \\ \hline
$\gamma$ & Awareness/rate preference coefficient (no unit)\\ \hline
\end{tabular}
\end{center}
\label{tab:AlgoParameters}
\end{table}
\begin{algorithm}[h!]
\caption{Environment-Aware Combined Power and Rate Control for Vehicular Communication (ECPR) algorithm}\label{euclid}
\begin{algorithmic}[1]
\Statex
\State $PL_{ij}(t) =P_{i}^{Tx}(t) - P_{ij}^{Rx}(t)$
\State $PLE_{ij} (t) =\frac{ PL_{ij} (t)}{10\log_{10}\left(\bengi{\frac{4 \pi}{\lambda}} d_{ij}(t)\right)}$
\Statex
\If {$Neighbor_{e\rightarrow{i}}(t) \in Neighborhood_e(t-1)$}
\State $P_{e\rightarrow{i}}^{Tx} (t) = \frac{1}{m}\sum_{j=1}^m P_{ij}^{Rx} (t) + 10 PLE_{ij} (t) \log_{10}\left(\bengi{\frac{4 \pi}{\lambda}}r_e(t)\right)$\\
\Else
\State {$P_{e\rightarrow{i}}^{Tx}(t) \gets DefaultTxPwr$\\
\EndIf
\State ${P_{sorted}}_e^{Tx} = sort_{\forall i,j\in N}(P_{e\rightarrow{i}}^{Tx} (t+1))$
\State $P_e^{Tx} (t+1) = {P_{sorted}}_e^{Tx} [round(TA_e(t)*N)]$
\Statex
\State $CBR(t) = \sum_{j=1}^n {lm_j}/C$
\State $BR(t+1) = (1-a)BR(t) + sign(CBR_{Th}- CBR(t))*min[X, b(CBR_{Th}- CBR(t))]$
\Statex
\State $\delta_A = TA_e(t)-eNAR(t)$
\State $\delta_R = \frac{TR(t)-BR(t)}{TR(t)}$
\If{$CBR(t)<CBR_{Th}$}
\State Apply $P_e^{Tx} (t+1)$
\Else
\If{$P_e^{Tx} (t+1) \leq P_e^{Tx} (t)$}
\State Apply $P_e^{Tx} (t+1)$
\ElsIf{$\delta_A \geq \gamma\delta_R$}
\State Apply $P_e^{Tx} (t+1)$
\Else
\State $P_e^{Tx} (t+1) \leftarrow{P_e^{Tx} (t)}$
\EndIf
\EndIf
}
\end{algorithmic}
\end{algorithm}
Algorithm~\ref{euclid} describes the steps of the ECPR algorithm, whereas Table~\ref{tab:AlgoParameters} summarizes the parameters used by ECPR. The proposed combined control algorithm adapts the next transmission power based on the current path loss ($PL_{ij}(t)$) and path loss exponent ($PLE_{ij}(t)$) for each message ($j$) received from the neighbors (See Alg.~1: Line~1-2). If the neighbor $i$ was already ego node's neighbor in the previous time step, the algorithm assigns the required transmit power to this neighbor based on the current $PL_{ij}(t)$, $PLE_{ij}(t)$, and target awareness range. Conversely, if this vehicle was not a neighbor to the ego node in the previous time step, a default value (e.g., 10~dBm or 23~dBm in our simulations) is used as needed in order for the transmission power to reach this neighbor. By using the default transmit power value, the ego node increases the probability of being heard by those nodes for which it does not know what kind of power is needed to reach them (See Alg.~1: Line~3-6). Once the ego node has the transmission power information it needs to reach each of the neighbors, it sorts these values from the least to the most. The next transmission power level of the ego node is chosen by considering the target awareness percentage. In other words, the smallest value that covers $TA\%$ for all neighbors is chosen as the next transmit power (See Alg.~1: Line~8-9). In terms of rate adaptation, ECPR adapts the rate by using the current message rate and channel load (\textit{i.e.} CBR). The ratio of the messages received divided by the channel capacity is defined as the CBR (See Alg.~1: Line~10-11) - this is in line with the standardized CBR calculation approaches~\cite{etsi14TR101612}.
Furthermore, as Algorithm~\ref{euclid} shows, the transmit power control takes into account the channel load (CBR), such that the transmit power is not increased if the CBR threshold is reached. The power control algorithm interacts with the rate control, such that the power and rate control ``share the load'' in case of high CBR: the relationship between the target and current beacon rate BR and the current and target awareness determines whether or not the transmit power will be changed (either increased or reduced). The value of coefficient $\gamma$ determines whether awareness or rate control is prioritized (In this study, we use the same weight for the awareness and rate: $\gamma$=1). Furthermore, in the case of high CBR, ECPR prevents a significant increase of the channel load that could be caused by the application context suddenly increasing the target awareness range $r_e$. However, we note that safety-critical messages generated due to hazardous events are going to be sent at a high power and rate that are not governed by the DCC algorithm. Therefore, controlling the power and rate of cooperative messages will not affect safety-critical messages (See Alg.~1: Line~10-11). For clarity, Table~\ref{tab:States} shows the transmit power control actions undertaken by ECPR depending on the channel load (CBR), awareness, and rate.
\begin{table}[t!]
\centering
\footnotesize
\caption{States that affect transmit power adaptation}
\vspace{5pt}
\begin{tabular}{l c c c c}
\hline
\textbf{State} &\textbf{CBR} & \textbf{Awareness} & \textbf{Rate} & \multirow{3}{*}{\textbf{Transmit Power at \textit{t+1}}}\\
& \textbf{vs.} & \textbf{vs.} & \textbf{vs.} &\\
&\textbf{Target} & \textbf{Target} &\textbf{Target} & \\ \hline
1 & $<$ & $<$ & $=$ & Apply $P_e^{Tx} (t+1)$\\
2 & $<$ & $\geq$ & $=$ & Apply $P_e^{Tx} (t+1)$ \\
3 & $<$ & $<$ & $<$ & Apply $P_e^{Tx} (t+1)$ \\
4 & $<$ & $\geq$ & $<$ & Apply $P_e^{Tx} (t+1)$ if $\leq$ $P_e^{Tx}(t)$\\
5 & $>$ & $<$ & $=$ & Apply $P_e^{Tx} (t+1)$ if $\leq$ $P_e^{Tx}(t)$ OR $\delta_A \geq \gamma\delta_R$\\
6 & $>$ & $\geq$ & $=$ & Apply $P_e^{Tx} (t+1)$ if $\leq$ $P_e^{Tx}(t)$\\
7 & $>$ & $<$ & $<$ & Apply $P_e^{Tx} (t+1)$ if $\leq$ $P_e^{Tx}(t)$ OR $\delta_A \geq \gamma\delta_R$ \\
8 & $>$ & $\geq$ & $<$ & Apply $P_e^{Tx} (t+1)$ if $\leq$ $P_e^{Tx}(t)$\\
\end{tabular}
\label{tab:States}
\end{table}
The awareness metric measures the awareness of \textit{neighboring vehicles} about the ego vehicle, thus it can be estimated at ego vehicle \textit{locally} by using the channel loss to each neighbor and the transmit power that will be used at the ego vehicle at $t+1$. Since obtaining the NAR metric from a receiver's perspective as defined in Section~\ref{subsec:Metrics} would require a vehicle to know about all vehicles within $r$ (in which case, by design, its NAR for $r$ would be $1$), we define the estimated NAR (eNAR) from transmitter's perspective as follows:
\begin{align}
eNAR_{r}(t) = \frac{ND'_{r}(t)}{N_{r}(t)},
\end{align}
where $N_{r}(t)$ is the number of vehicles within $r$ at time $t$ which ego vehicle \textit{detected} (\textit{i.e.}, received a cooperative message from), and $ND'_{r}(t)$ is the estimated number vehicles in $N_{r}(t)$ that detected the ego vehicle, calculated as:
\begin{align}
ND'_{r}(t) = \bengi{\epsilon \cdot}\sum_{i=1}^N{I(P_e^{Tx}(t-1)+PL_{e\rightarrow{i}}^{Tx}(t-1)>P_{Th}^{Rx})},
\label{ndt}
\end{align}
where $I$ is the indicator function, $PL_{e\rightarrow{i}}^{Tx}(t-1)$ is the channel loss from ego vehicle to neighbor $i$, and $P_{Th}^{Rx}$ is the receiver sensitivity threshold. Effectively, the ego vehicle uses the channel reciprocity theorem ($PL_{e\leftarrow{i}}^{Tx}=PL_{e\rightarrow{i}}^{Tx}$)~\cite{rappaport96} to estimate the proportion of its neighbors that were able to receive cooperative messages from it in the previous time step. \bengi{The estimation error for number of neighbors is defined as $\epsilon$ and is set to $[-10,10] \%$. It is possible that a comparatively high power signal is lost due to strong interference (although not too frequently, since CSMA/CA mechanism and congestion control mechanism are in place). Hence, Equation~(\ref{ndt}) can introduce false positive cases which lead to an inaccurate number of neighbors.}
At low densities, when vehicles have a small number of neighbors, the eNAR estimate can be incorrect because of a small number of data points it needs to work with. However, in low density cases, vehicles will almost always be able to achieve the maximum rate and awareness, since the channel load at low densities will be low. Therefore, knowing the correct eNAR is not necessary. As the network density increases and vehicles start having more neighbors and they have a larger number of data points to work with (\textit{e.g.}, $100$ instead of $10$ neighbors), which makes the eNAR estimate more accurate.
\section{Simulation Setup}\label{Experiment Results}
\begin{figure*}[t!]
\begin{center}
\subfigure[Highway Scenario]{\label{highwayRegion}\includegraphics[height=0.35\textwidth]{highwayMap2.eps}}\hspace{1mm}
\subfigure[Urban Scenario]{\label{urbanRegion}\includegraphics[height=0.35\textwidth]{urbanMap2.eps}}\hspace{1mm}
\caption{Regions used for highway and urban simulations (circled) on the topology of Newcastle, UK. Both regions have an area of approximately $1 km^2$. White outlines represent buildings that were incorporated in simulations for realistic propagation modeling.}
\label{region}
\end{center}
\end{figure*}
To evaluate the performance of ECPR, we implemented it in the GEMV$^2$ V2V propagation simulator~\cite{boban14TVT}. GEMV$^2$ is a computationally efficient propagation model for V2V communications, which explicitly accounts for surrounding objects (\textit{e.g.}, buildings, foliage and vehicles~\cite{boban11}). The model considers different V2V links types (LOS, non-LOS due to static objects, non-LOS due to vehicles) depending on the LOS conditions between the transmitter and receiver to deterministically calculate large-scale signal variations. Additionally, GEMV$^2$ determines small-scale signal variations stochastically using a simple geometry-based model that takes into account the surrounding static and mobile objects (specifically, their number and size). By implementing ECPR in GEMV$^2$, we are able to show how it behaves in realistic propagation conditions, including varying LOS that affects the path loss and highly dynamic network topology changes caused by transition between environments (\textit{e.g.}, a vehicle on a road with low vehicular density moving to a high-density intersection).
In terms of parameters, the time step used for the ECPR time step duration was set to $200$ $ms$. For a given target range $r$, we use a target awareness $TA=85\%$. We use omni-directional antennas on the vehicle roof and evaluate the DCC performance on a single channel. We set the maximum transmit power to $23~dBm$ and the maximum beacon rate to $10~Hz$. We used the performance metrics described in Section~\ref{subsec:Metrics}.
To give a physical perspective to the parameters relevant for ECPR, the typical values for awareness range $r$ are from $20$ to $500~m$, depending on application context; similarly, target awareness within $r$, $TA$, will be dependent on the application context and can range from \textit{e.g.}, 50\% to 100\%; $P_e^{Tx}$ is usually limited from $0$ to $23~dBm$ in radios used for V2V communication, whereas the message rate $BR$ is usually set between $1$ and $10~Hz$ for cooperative messages~\cite{etsi14TR101612}. Communication parameters considered in this paper are summarized in Table~\ref{tab:parameters}.
Since the goal of this study is to show the feasibility of environment- and context-aware DCC control by leveraging the benefits of both power and rate adaptation, we choose to compare the proposed ECPR algorithm with LIMERIC (rate-only DCC algorithm), the power-control only component of ECPR, and a scenario without DCC (\textit{i.e.}, messages are set with fixed rate and power irrespective of the channel conditions).
\begin{table}[t!]
\centering
\small
\caption{System Parameters}
\begin{tabular}{l c}
\hline
\textbf{Parameter} & \textbf{Value}\\ \hline
Carrier sense threshold [dBm]& -90\\
Data rate [Mbps]& 6\\
Measurement period [ms]&200\\
Min. and Max.packet transmission frequency [Hz]&1 and 10 \\
Min. and Max. transmission power [dBm]&0 and 23 \\
Min. and Max. awareness range [m]&20 and 500 \\
Target neighbor awareness ratio& 85\%\\
Threshold Channel Busy Ratio& 60\%\\
\end{tabular}
\label{tab:parameters}
\end{table}
\subsection{Simulated environments}
One of the most challenging scenarios for DCC algorithms is to ensure they properly function in any kind of environment. To that end, we perform simulations using the city of \textit{Newcastle upon Tyne, England} as shown in Figure~\ref{region}. The region around \textit{A167} is chosen for the highway scenario. A part of the city grid around \textit{Princess Square} is used to simulate an urban area. We used $1$ $km^2$ area and $500$ vehicles for both the highway and urban simulations. Vehicular mobility is generated using SUMO~\cite{SUMO2012}, whereas OpenStreetMap~\cite{openstreetmap} is used to obtain the outlines of buildings and foliage for accurate propagation modeling.
\subsection{Application Context: Varying Target Rate and Target Awareness Distance}
As shown in Figure~\ref{SysArchHway}, depending on the application context, different vehicles can have different awareness range and rate requirements at the same time. To test ECPR with varying awareness range and rates, we perform four types of tests described in Table~\ref{tests}. In Test 1, each vehicle's target awareness range is set to $90~m$ and target beacon rate is $10~Hz$. In Test 2, the target awareness distance is 90 m and target beacon rate is different for all ego nodes. The target rate is chosen uniformly across an interval of $[5,10]~Hz$. In Test 3 and 4, the target awareness distances are selected uniformly at random.
\begin{table}[t!]
\centering
\small
\caption{Tests defined with different target awareness range and message rate combinations to stress-test ECPR}
\vspace{2pt}
\begin{tabular}{c c c}
\hline
& \textbf{Target Awareness Range} & \textbf{Target Message Rate} \\ \hline
\textbf{Test 1} & Same for all vehicles (90~m) & Same for all nodes (10 Hz) \\ \hline
\multirow{2}{*}{\textbf{Test 2}} & \multirow{2}{*}{Same for all vehicles (90~m)} & Uniformly distributed \\
& &between 5 and 10 Hz \\ \hline
\multirow{2}{*}{\textbf{Test 3}} & Chosen randomly from set & \multirow{2}{*}{Same for all nodes (10 Hz)} \\
& S = [30, 60, 90, 120, 150, 180~m] & \\ \hline
\multirow{2}{*}{\textbf{Test 4}} & Chosen randomly from set & Uniformly distributed \\
&S = [30, 60, 90, 120, 150, 180~m] &between 5 and 10 Hz\\ \hline
\end{tabular}
\label{tests}
\end{table}
\section{Results}
\subsection{Comparison of ECPR with LIMERIC, power-only algorithm, and no DCC}
In this subsection, we compare the performance of ECPR relative to LIMERIC (rate-only algorithm), the power-control only component of ECPR (described in Section~\ref{Power Adaptation}), and a scenario without DCC. To obtain a fair comparison, we use only Test 1 from Table~\ref{tests} (\textit{i.e.}, same awareness range and rate requirements for all vehicles). We perform simulations with different default transmit power settings: these affect the initial power levels for radios employed in the ECPR and power-only adaptation scenarios, whereas for no DCC and rate-only DCC scenarios the default power is used throughout the simulation.
\begin{figure*}[th!]
\begin{center}
\subfigure[Neighbor awareness vs. transmission distance]{\label{narUrban150TxPwr10}\includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth]{narUrban150TxPwr10_2.eps}}\hspace{1mm}
\subfigure[Neighbors above range causes unwanted interference vs. transmission distance]{\label{rnarUrban150TxPwr10}\includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth]{rnarUrban150TxPwr10_2.eps}}\hspace{1mm}
\subfigure[Message rate]{\label{rateUrban150TxPwr10}\includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth]{rateUrban150TxPwr10_2.eps}}\hspace{1mm}
\subfigure[Transmit power]{\label{powerUrban150TxPwr10}\includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth]{powerUrban150TxPwr10_2.eps}}\hspace{1mm}
\subfigure[Channel busy ratio (CBR)]{\label{ cbrUrban150TxPwr10}\includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth]{cbrUrban150TxPwr10.eps}}\hspace{1mm}
\caption{Target Awareness $85\%$, Target Awareness Distance = 150m, default Tx Power = 10 dBm. Urban Scenario. Power-only algorithm achieves awareness (NAR) comparable to ECPR; however, due to it not taking channel load (CBR) into account, it \bengi{exceeds} the target CBR.
}
\label{powerRateDiffAdp150}
\end{center}
\end{figure*}
\begin{figure*}[t!]
\begin{center}
\subfigure[NAR]{\label{narUrban50TxPwr23}\includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth]{narUrban50TxPwr23_2.eps}}\hspace{1mm}
\subfigure[RNAR]{\label{rnarUrban50TxPwr23}\includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth]{rnarUrban50TxPwr23_2.eps}}\hspace{1mm}
\subfigure[Message rate]{\label{rateUrban50TxPwr23}\includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth]{rateUrban50TxPwr23_2.eps}}\hspace{1mm}
\subfigure[Transmit power]{\label{powerUrban50TxPwr23}\includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth]{powerUrban50TxPwr23_2.eps}}\hspace{1mm}
\subfigure[CBR]{\label{cbrUrban50TxPwr23}\includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth]{cbrUrban50TxPwr23_2.eps}}\hspace{1mm}
\caption{Target Awareness $85\%$, Target Awareness Distance = 50m, default Tx Power = 23 dBm. Urban Scenario. In this application context, ECPR can reduce the average power while not jeopardizing awareness. This allows for increase of overall throughput in the system as visible through increased average rate, while at the same time keeping the average CBR lower than that of rate-only algorithm.
}
\label{powerRateDiffAdp50_2}
\end{center}
\end{figure*}
Figure~\ref{powerRateDiffAdp150} shows the results for the urban environment with a target awareness range of $150~m$, a default transmit power of $10~dBm$. Compared to rate-only (LIMERIC), ECPR can achieve a $20\%$ increase in points better awareness at the target distance by reducing the average rate from approximately $9~Hz$ to $8~Hz$. This scenario can be regarded as awareness-focused, where an application (\textit{e.g.}, intersection collision detection) requires vehicles to be aware of other vehicles within $150~m$ range. In this case, it is reasonable to trade some of the rate to increase the transmit power (Figure~\ref{powerUrban150TxPwr10}) and obtain an overall better awareness, since the messages that are traded for increased awareness are likely cooperative awareness messages at lower power, which would not be able to reach all vehicles at desired range, which defeats the purpose of sending those messages in the first place. Power-only algorithm achieves awareness (NAR) comparable to ECPR; however, due to not taking channel load (CBR) into account, it would exceed the target CBR.
Figure~\ref{powerRateDiffAdp50_2} shows results for an urban environment with target awareness range of $50~m$, default transmit power of $23~dBm$ and showing how ECPR can achieve up to $25\%$ better average message rate, \bengi{for} the same satisfying requirement of the awareness rate at target awareness range. In this scenario, because the application context allows it, ECPR can reduce the average power (Figure~\ref{powerUrban50TxPwr23}) while not jeopardizing awareness. This allows for an increase of overall throughput in the system (see Figure~\ref{rateUrban50TxPwr23}), while at the same time keeping the average CBR lower than that of rate-only algorithm (see Figure~\ref{cbrUrban50TxPwr23}). In this scenario, no DCC adaptation performs as well as rate-only in terms of awareness; however, the CBR target is not satisfied. This emphasizes the need for DCC algorithms, since without adaptation there is a risk of channel overload and communication breakdown in case of high vehicular density. Note that ECPR can only adapt to awareness and rate requirements to the extent allowed by the physical surroundings (\textit{e.g.}, it is not possible to reach $500~m$ awareness range with $95\%$ awareness rate without very high transmit power) and transmit power parameters (which we limit to $0-23~dBm$ range so as to comply with the capabilities of existing IEEE 802.11p radios).
\begin{figure*}[t!]
\begin{center}
\subfigure[Channel busy ratio]{\label{urbanCbrRandom100}\includegraphics[width = 0.49\textwidth]{urbanCbrRandom100.eps}}\hspace{1mm}
\subfigure[Message rate]{\label{urbanRateRandom100}\includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth]{urbanRateRandom100.eps}}\hspace{1mm}
\caption{Randomly selected 100 vehicles for Target Awareness Distance = 50~m, default Tx Power = 23~dBm.}
\label{urbanRandom100scattering}
\end{center}
\end{figure*}
In Figure~\ref{urbanRandom100scattering} the per-vehicle behavior of the CBR and rate for 100 randomly chosen vehicles is shown. Although CBR overshoots the threshold CBR at each time step for both scenarios, it happens for one time step only, specifically when new vehicles enter the simulation. In the next step, the ECPR adapts the beacon rates to keep the CBR under the threshold. Regarding per-vehicle statistics, the results show that ECPR can control the load and can meet the target rate for all vehicles whose awareness requirements and environment allow it. It is important to note that ECPR aims to reach both the target awareness range and message rate based on the application requirements and given the constraints of specific physical environment. This results in a relatively large message rate spread, since the environment dictates that some vehicles need to transmit at higher power to reach the neighbors to which it has a bad channel (e.g., those behind a corner), which in turn increases the load for those neighbors to which it has a good (LOS) channel. In other words, combined awareness and rate control will not result in the same message rate at all vehicles unless their propagation environment is the same.
\begin{figure*}[t!]
\begin{center}
\subfigure[The number of vehicles that can achieve the target message rate for Target Awareness Distance = 50~m, default Tx Power = 23~dBm.]{\label{reachedTarRate50TxPwr23}\includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth]{reachedTarRate50TxPwr23.eps}}\hspace{1mm}
\subfigure[The number of vehicles that can achieve the target awareness. Target Awareness Distance = 150~m; default Tx Power = 10~dBm.]{\label{reachedTarAwar150TxPwr10}\includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth]{reachedTarAwar150TxPwr10.eps}}\hspace{1mm}
\caption{The number of vehicles that can achieve the target awareness.The number of vehicles that can reach awareness target, $85\%$, and rate target, $10~Hz$, for rate-only algorithm and ECPR. As a result of adaptation on transmission power on ECPR, frequency reuse is able to be used more actively, more vehicles reach the target message rate, and reaches target awareness more stably than rate-only adaptation.}
\end{center}
\label{vehiclesCanReachTarget}
\end{figure*}
In Figure~\ref{reachedTarRate50TxPwr23} the number of vehicles that can achieve the target message rate, $10~Hz$ for this experiment, is shown for rate-only and ECPR adaptations. Since ECPR adapts the transmission power to various context, transmission power is reduced if needed. As a result of adaptation on transmission power, frequency reuse is able to be used more actively and more vehicles reach the target message rate than rate-only adaptation. In addition to target rate, the number of vehicles that can achieve the awareness target, $85\%$, is compared in Figure~\ref{reachedTarAwar150TxPwr10}. Rate-only adaptation uses default transmission power therefore has limited capability to achieve target awareness for any kind of application while ECPR can adapt the transmission power to changing application and environment. Consequently, ECPR reaches target awareness more stably than rate-only adaptation.
\begin{figure*}[t!]
\begin{center}
\subfigure[Highway scenario average message rate]{\label{rateHighwayTest}\includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth]{rateHighwayStraightTests.eps}}\hspace{1mm}
\subfigure[Highway scenario average transmit power]{\label{powerHighwayTest}\includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth]{powerHighwayStraightTests.eps}}\hspace{1mm}
\subfigure[Urban scenario average message rate]{\label{rateUrbanTest}\includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth]{rateUrbanRealTests.eps}}\hspace{1mm}
\subfigure[Urban scenario average transmit power]{\label{powerUrbanTest}\includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth]{powerUrbanRealTests.eps}}\hspace{1mm}
\caption{Average transmit Power and beacon rate for highway and urban environments. The relationship between average message rate and average transmit power is reversely proportional on each environment. }
\label{powerRateTest}
\end{center}
\end{figure*}
ECPR is tested for different default transmission power values to see its adaptation ability to any environment and context cases. However, we use 10 dBm power and 150 m target range (low default power, high range requirement) and 23 dBm power and 50 m target range (high default power, low range requirement) to show how ECPR performs in comparatively extreme cases.
\subsection{Different Target Rate and Awareness Distance Sets for Combined Algorithm: Urban vs Highway Environment}
Figure~\ref{powerRateTest} shows average \bengi{message rates and transmit powers} for different tests. Target awareness range and message rate are denoted in Table~\ref{tests}. The relationship between average message rate and average transmit power is reversely proportional on each environment: the lower the average power, the smaller the message coverage, resulting in better channel reuse and higher rate. The average rate is similar in the two environments because the high density of vehicles means that the channel is loaded most of the time. Interesting to note is that in urban scenarios, the average power converges to a value lower than in highway scenarios; this can be attributed to the increased number of neighbors for the same range in urban environment. Thus, the channel becomes more congested from neighbors at shorter distance and requiring lower power to reach them. In turn, this offsets the range limitations due to obstructing buildings requiring larger power for the same range at highways.
\begin{figure*}[t!]
\begin{center}
\subfigure[Highway scenario]{\label{deltaRateHighwayTest}\includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth]{deltaRateHighwayStraightTests.eps}}\hspace{1mm}
\subfigure[Urban scenario]{\label{deltaRateUrbanTest}\includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth]{deltaRateUrbanRealTests.eps}}\hspace{1mm}
\caption{Average difference between target and achieved message rate for highway and urban environments. Test 1 and 3 target the maximum message rate, the difference between target and current rate is higher than in Test 2 and Test 4. The target rate is on average less than maximum rate, thus the difference of achieved to target rate is less.}
\label{deltaRateTest}
\end{center}
\end{figure*}
\begin{figure*}[t!]
\begin{center}
\subfigure[Highway scenario]{\label{CBRHighwayTest}\includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth]{CBRhighwayStraightTests.eps}}\hspace{1mm}
\subfigure[Urban scenario]{\label{CBRUrbanTest}\includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth]{CBRurbanRealTests.eps}}\hspace{1mm}
\caption{Standard deviation and mean of CBRs in highway and urban environments. The threshold CBR value is set as 0.6 with $\pm$ 0.05 tolerance.In urban scenario, average CBR is higher than in the highway scenario. The reason is that each ego node needs to communicate with a larger number of neighboring vehicles in urban environment than highway due to the vehicles being concentrated around intersections~\cite{tonguz09_2}; combined with higher power to achieve the same awareness, this results in higher overall CBR.}
\label{CBRtests}
\end{center}
\end{figure*}
Figure~\ref{deltaRateTest} shows the difference between the target message rates and the achieved rate for both urban and highway scenarios. Since Test 1 and 3 target the maximum message rate, the difference between target and current rate is higher than in Test 2 and Test 4. In other words, in Tests 2 and 4, the target rate is on average less than maximum rate, thus the difference of achieved to target rate is less.
Figure~\ref{CBRtests} shows the average CBR levels and their standard deviations for each time step for all tests. As expected, the test which has higher average message rate also has higher CBR values. However, average CBR values never overflow the CBR threshold, which is $0.6$ with $\pm0.05$ tolerance. Although new vehicles entering the simulation and starting at maximum transmit power join the communication at each second, ECPR adapts the power and message rate at the next time step and decreases the CBR to threshold value. In urban scenario, average CBR is higher than in the highway scenario. The reason is that each ego node needs to communicate with a larger number of neighboring vehicles in urban environment than highway due to the vehicles being concentrated around intersections~\cite{tonguz09_2}; combined with higher power to achieve the same awareness, this results in higher overall CBR.
The results show that ECPR can effectively adapt the power and rate to achieve the target requirements on awareness and rate given by the application context, irrespective of the propagation environment. Since it has the ability to obtain higher average rate when the awareness requirements allow it, at the same time maintaining or reducing the CBR as compared to rate-only solution, it can be used to improve the overall system throughput. Conversely, if the awareness requirements are more stringent or the propagation environment more harsh, ECPR efficiently trades rate to improve the awareness.
\subsection{Effect of Medium Access Layer Collisions}
\begin{figure*}[t!]
\begin{center}
\subfigure[NAR]{\label{narMAC}\includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth]{narMAC.eps}}\hspace{1mm}
\subfigure[RNAR]{\label{rnarMAC}\includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth]{rnarMAC.eps}}\hspace{1mm}
\subfigure[Message rate]{\label{rateMAC}\includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth]{rateMAC.eps}}\hspace{1mm}
\subfigure[Transmit power]{\label{powerMAC}\includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth]{powerMAC.eps}}\hspace{1mm}
\subfigure[CBR]{\label{cbrMAC}\includegraphics[width=0.49\textwidth]{cbrMAC.eps}}\hspace{1mm}
\caption{Target Awareness $85\%$, Target Awareness Distance = 50m, default Tx Power = 23 dBm. Urban Scenario with MAC collisions.}
\label{mac}
\end{center}
\end{figure*}
To investigate the effect of Medium Access Layer (MAC) collisions on the performance of ECPR, we perform simulations with the same network conditions as for the scenario shown in Figure~\ref{powerRateDiffAdp150} (Target Awareness 85\%, Target Awareness Distance = 150m, default Tx Power = 10 dBm), with increased loss due to MAC collisions (note that results in Figure~\ref{powerRateDiffAdp150} consider no loss due to MAC collision). The collision statistics are defined as follows: when CBR is below $20\%$, $20-30\%$, $30-40\%$, $40-50\%$, $50-60\%$, and above $60\%$, MAC layer collision causes $0\%$, $1\%$,$3\%$,$7\%$, $10\%$, $30\%$ packets drops, respectively. These parameters are selected to represent harsh conditions caused by progressively increasing collisions with the increase in channel load~\cite{choi2003ieee}.
Compared with Figure~\ref{powerRateDiffAdp150}, Figure~\ref{narMAC}--~\ref{rnarMAC}, shows that the effect of MAC collisions is quite limited in terms of the key performance metrics of ECPR (NAR, RNAR); similarly limited difference can be observed in Figures~\ref{rateMAC}--~\ref{cbrMAC} in terms of the resulting network parameters (message rate, transmit power, and CBR). Therefore, we conclude that ECPR utilizes channel as effective as possible while keeping CBR under the threshold even in the face of MACe collisions. \bengi{In~Figure~\ref{rateMAC}, the dip points are how network parameters react to changes without any adaptation yet. The ECPR adapts the parameters to the optimum values every $200~msec$ by considering the resource limitations.}
\begin{table}[!t]
\centering
\small
\caption{Average percentage of potentially hidden nodes for ECPR and rate-only (LIMERIC) algorithm.}
\vspace{-5pt}
\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{|l |c |c |c |c|}
\hline
\multirow{3}{*}{~} & \multicolumn{2}{|c|}{Transmit Power = 23~dBm} & \multicolumn{2}{|c|}{Transmit Power = 10~dBm} \\
& \multicolumn{2}{|c|}{ Awareness Range = 50~m} & \multicolumn{2}{|c|}{Awareness Range = 150~m} \\
& 50 Vehicle & 100 Vehicles & 50 Vehicles & 100 Vehicles \\ \hline
ECPR & 12.9$\%$ & 22.4$\%$ & 8.5$\%$ & 17.4$\%$ \\
LIMERIC & 11.9$\%$ & 23.2$\%$ & 8.7$\%$ &16.5$\%$ \\ \hline
\end{tabular}
\end{center}
\label{hnpTable}
\end{table}
Hidden node problem is another access layer consideration that can be caused by the propagation environment layout as well the transmit power variations. To illustrate the issue, consider the scenario in Figure~\ref{SysArchUrban}, where two vehicles on perpendicular roads are trying to transmit to vehicle in the center of intersection; if those two vehicles cannot ``hear'' each other, they create the hidden node problem on the vehicle in the intersection. For each of A's neighbors, we check if that neighbor can ``hear'' from A's other neighbors. Each pair of A's neighbors that cannot hear each other is counted as potentially causing a hidden node problem at A. Thus, the percentage of hidden nodes is computed as the proportion of potentially hidden node pairs to total number of communication pairs. The results in Table~\ref{hnpTable} show that ECPR results in comparative percentage of hidden node pairs as LIMERIC (i.e., ECPR does not increase the probability of hidden nodes).
\section{Conclusions}
\label{Conclusion}
In this paper, we proposed a combined rate and power DCC algorithm that efficiently achieves the target awareness and rate requirements given by the application context (\textit{e.g.}, target applications, vehicle speed, traffic density) in varying propagation environments. By using path loss exponent estimation, ECPR adapts the transmit power to reach the target awareness range. ECPR controls the channel load by adjusting the rate and power according to the current channel load, awareness range, and rate information. We perform realistic simulations, incorporating real world information about mobile and static objects (vehicles, buildings, and foliage) and test ECPR in scenarios with varying LOS conditions, highly dynamic network topology, and different environments (highway and urban). We show that ECPR has the ability to obtain higher rate when the awareness requirements allow it, improving the average rate by 15+\%, while keeping the target awareness and channel load. If the awareness requirements are more stringent or the propagation environment more harsh, ECPR efficiently trades rate to improve the awareness by up to $20$ percentage points. ECPR can be implemented atop existing DCC solutions with little effort, as the only additional information it requires is the transmit power of the message that can be piggybacked in the message itself.
\bibliographystyle{elsarticle-num}
|
\section*{Introduction}
Let $C$ be a smooth complex curve of genus $g>1$,
denote by $C^2$ the cartesian product of
$C$ with itself, by $C^{(2)}$ the
second symmetric product of $C$
and by $\pi\colon C^2\to C^{(2)}$ the
double cover $(p,q)\mapsto p+q$.
Let $\Delta$ be the image
of the diagonal via $\pi$ and $K$ be
a canonical divisor of $C^{(2)}$.
In this paper we are interested
in the finite generation of the {\em extended
canonical ring}:
\[
R(\Delta,K)
\, :=\,
\bigoplus_{(a,b)\in{\mathbb Z}^2}H^0(C^{(2)},a\Delta+bK).
\]
It is not difficult to show that finite generation
is equivalent to ask that the two-dimensional
cone $\Nef(\Delta,K)$ consisting of classes
of nef divisors within the rational vector space
spanned by the classes of $\Delta$ and $K$
must be generated by two semiample classes
(see proof of Theorem~\ref{teo-1}).
The Kouvidakis conjecture~\cite{CK} states that,
for the very general curve, if $\Nef(\Delta,K)$ is
closed then $g$ must be a square,
i.e. $g = (k-1)^2$ for $k>1$ integer.
We thus focus our attention to
the case of square genus and assume $C$
to be a complete intersection of a
quadric $Q$ with a degree $k>2$ hypersurface.
We denote by $\eta_C$ the class of the
difference of the two $g_k^1$ of $C$
induced by the two rulings of $Q$, which
is trivial if $Q$ is a cone.
Our first result is the following.
\begin{introthm}
\label{teo-1}
Let $C\subseteq{\mathbb P}^3$ be a smooth complete
intersection of a quadric with a degree $k>2$
surface. Then the following are equivalent.
\begin{enumerate}
\item
$R(\Delta,K)$ is finitely generated.
\item
$\eta_C$ is torsion non-trivial.
\end{enumerate}
Moreover if both the above conditions are satisfied
then $\eta_C$ has order at least $k$.
\end{introthm}
Let $\mathcal F_k$ be the open subset
of the Hilbert scheme of curves of bi-degree $(k,k)$
of ${\mathbb P}^1\times{\mathbb P}^1$ consisting of smooth curves
and let $\mathcal F_k^{\rm tor}\subseteq\mathcal F_k$
be the subset consisting of curves $C$ such that
the class $\eta_C$ of the difference between the
two $g_k^1$ is torsion.
Our second theorem is the following.
\begin{introthm}
\label{teo-2}
The locus $\mathcal F_k^{\rm tor}$ is
a countable union of subvarieties of complex dimension
$\geq 4k-1$ and the set of subvarieties of
dimension $4k-1$ is dense in $\mathcal F_k$
in the analytic topology.
\end{introthm}
The paper is organized as follows.
In Section~\ref{sym}, after recalling some basic facts
about the symmetric product of a curve,
we prove Theorem~\ref{teo-1}. In Section~\ref{grid-fam}
we introduce the grid family consisting of
curves of bi-degree $(k,k)$ on a smooth quadric
which pass through a complete intersection
of type $(k,0),(0,k)$. We show that the
grid family is exactly the subvariety
of $\mathcal F_k^{\rm tor}$ corresponding to
torsion of order $k$ and
has the expected dimension $4k-1$.
Section~\ref{density} is devoted to the proof of Theorem~
\ref{teo-2}. In Section~\ref{hyp} we prove a density
theorem for hyperelliptic curves, providing
an alternative proof for Theorem~\ref{teo-2}
in case $g=4$ (see Corollary~\ref{cor}).
This result has an independent
interest and is proved in the spirit of Griffiths
computations of the infinitesimal invariant~\cite{Gr}.
Finally, in Section~\ref{exa}
we consider examples
of curves $C$ with $\eta_C$ torsion.
In all the paper we work over the field of complex
numbers except for Section~\ref{sym} (see Remark~\ref{ch}).
\section{The second symmetric product}
\label{sym}
Let $C$ be a smooth projective
curve of genus $g>1$ defined over an algebraically
closed field ${\mathbb K}$ of characteristic $0$.
\begin{proposition}\label{pic}
The diagonal embedding
$\imath\colon C\to C^{(2)}$
induces an isomorphism
$\imath^*\colon \Pic^0(C^{(2)})\to
\Pic^0(C)$ of abelian varieties.
\end{proposition}
\begin{proof}
To prove the statement we explicitly construct
the inverse map of $\imath^*$. Given a point
$p\in C$ let $H_p$ be the curve of $C^{(2)}$
which is the image of $\{p\}\times C$ via $\pi$.
Define the map ${\rm Div}(C)\to {\rm Div}(C^{(2)})$ by
$\sum_in_ip_i\mapsto\sum_i n_iH_{p_i}$ and
observe that it maps principal divisors to principal
divisors. The induced map of Picard groups
restricts to a homomorphism $\Pic^0(C)\to
\Pic^0(C^{(2)})$ which is easily seen to be a
right inverse of $\imath^*$.
Since the two abelian varieties
$\Pic^0(C)$ and $\Pic^0(C^{(2)})$ have
the same dimension we conclude that
$\imath^*$ is an isomorphism.
\end{proof}
Observe that $\Delta$ is the branch divisor
of the double cover $\pi$ and thus
its class is divisible by $2$ in $\Pic(C^{(2)})$.
Moreover the following linear equivalences
\[
\Delta|_\Delta
\sim
-2K_\Delta
\qquad
\qquad
K|_\Delta
\sim
3K_\Delta
\]
can be proved by passing to $C^2$
and calculating the restriction of $K_{C^2}$
to the diagonal.
By the Riemann-Hurwitz formula we get the equalities
$2(2g-2)^2 = K_{C^2}^2 = 2 (K + \frac{\Delta}{2})^2$
from which we deduce the following
\begin{equation}
\label{intersections}
K^2 = (g-1)(4g-9)
\qquad
K\cdot\Delta = 6(g-1)
\qquad
\Delta^2 = -4(g-1).
\end{equation}
In particular the classes of $\Delta$ and $K$ are
independent in the N\'eron-Severi group of ${C^{(2)}}$.
We let $\langle \Delta, K\rangle$ be the rational
vector subspace of $\Pic({C^{(2)}})\otimes_{\mathbb Z}{\mathbb Q}$
generated by the classes of $\Delta$ and $K$
and form the following cone
\[
{\rm Nef}(\Delta,K)
=
\{D\in\langle \Delta, K\rangle\, :\, D\text{ is nef}\}.
\]
This cone is related to the Kouvidakis conjecture
which predicts which ones are the extremal rays of
${\rm Nef}(\Delta,K)$. In case the genus is a square,
i.e. $g = (k-1)^2$, the conjecture is known to be
true~\cite{CK} for a very general curve $C$ and it
holds as well if $C$ has an irreducible $g_k^1$,
that is the curve~\eqref{eq:gamma} defined below
is irreducible.
In this case the extremal rays of ${\rm Nef}(\Delta,K)$
are spanned by the classes of $2K+3\Delta$ and
$2K+(5-2k)\Delta$.
\begin{proposition}
\label{ray-1}
Let $C$ be a smooth curve of genus at least
two. Then the divisor
$2K+3\Delta$ of $C^{(2)}$ is semiample.
\end{proposition}
\begin{proof}
Observe that the divisor $2K+3\Delta$
is big since $K$ is ample and $\Delta$
is effective. Moreover it is nef since
$(2K+3\Delta)\cdot\Delta = 0$.
We have an exact sequence of sheaves
\[
\xymatrix@1{
0\ar[r]
&
{\mathcal O}_{C^{(2)}}(2K+2\Delta)\ar[r]
&
{\mathcal O}_{C^{(2)}}(2K+3\Delta)\ar[r]
&
{\mathcal O}_\Delta\ar[r]
&
0.
}
\]
Since $2K+2\Delta = N + K+\frac{1}{2}\Delta$,
with $N=\frac{1}{2}(2K+3\Delta)$ nef and big,
then by the Kawamata-Viehweg vanishing
theorem and the long exact sequence in
cohomology of the above sequence we
conclude that $\Delta$ is not contained
in the base locus of $|2K+3\Delta|$.
The statement follows by the ampleness
of $K$ and the Zariski-Fujita theorem
~\cite[Remark 2.1.32]{La}.
\end{proof}
Assume now that $C$ is a smooth curve
of genus $g = (k-1)^2>1$ which admits a
$g_k^1$ and define the following curve
of $C^{(2)}$:
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:gamma}
\Gamma \, :=\, \{p+q : g_k^1-p-q\geq 0\}.
\end{equation}
It can be easily proved that $\Gamma$ is irreducible
if the $g_k^1$ does not contain a $g_r^1$ with $r<k$.
In particular this holds if the $g_k^1$ is simple.
Observe that the $g_k^1$ defines a morphism
$\Gamma\to{\mathbb P}^1$ of degree $\frac{1}{2}k(k-1)$
whose branch points are exactly those
of the $g_k^1$. Thus if the $g_k^1$ is simple
we deduce that
\begin{equation}
\label{genus}
2g(\Gamma)-2 = -k(k-1)+2(k-2)(k-1)k,
\end{equation}
where $g(\Gamma)$ is the genus of $\Gamma$.
By continuity the genus of $\Gamma$ stays the
same even if the $g_k^1$ is not simple.
\begin{lemma}\label{gamma}
If $C$ admits a $g_k^1$ then the divisor
$2K+(5-2k)\Delta$ is numerically equivalent to
$(4k-8)\Gamma$.
Moreover if $C\in\mathcal F_k$, the curves
$\Gamma$ and $\Gamma'$ corresponding to the
two distinct $g_k^1$ on $C$ are disjoint.
\end{lemma}
\begin{proof}
Let $H$ be the curve of $C^{(2)}$ defined by
$\{p+q : q\in C\}$. By the Riemann-Hurwitz formula one
has the numerical equivalence
\[
K
\equiv
(2g-2)H-\frac{1}{2}\Delta.
\]
Thus by the genus formula $2g(\Gamma)-2
= \Gamma^2+(2g-2)\Gamma\cdot H-\frac{1}{2}
\Delta\cdot\Gamma$, by Equation~\eqref{genus}
and the equalities $\Gamma\cdot H = k-1$,
$\Delta\cdot\Gamma = 2g-2+2k$ we deduce
$\Gamma^2=0$. Since the intersection matrix
of the divisors $\Gamma,K,\Delta$
\[
\left(
\begin{array}{rrr}
0 & (2k-5)(k-1)k & 2(k-1)k\\
(2k-5)(k-1)k & (2k-5)(k-2)k(2k+1) & 6(k-2)k\\
2(k-1)k & 6(k-2)k & -4(k-2)k
\end{array}
\right)
\]
has rank two, by the Hodge Index theorem $\Gamma$ is
numerically equivalent to a rational linear
combination of $K$ and $\Delta$.
Moreover, being the kernel of the above matrix
generated by the vector $(4k - 8, -2, 2k - 5)$, we
get the first statement.
Observe that $\Gamma$ and $\Gamma'$
have no common component since
otherwise the map from $C$ to the quadric
given by the two $g_k^1$
would not be an embedding.
Thus the second statement
immediately follows from the equality
$\Gamma\cdot\Gamma' = \Gamma^2=0$.
\end{proof}
\begin{lemma}\label{fib}
If $f\colon C^{(2)}\to Y$ is a fibration with connected
fibers onto a smooth curve, then $Y$ has genus
at most one. If moreover a fiber of $f$ is numerically
equivalent to a rational linear combination of
$\Delta$ and $K$ then $Y$ is rational.
\end{lemma}
\begin{proof}
To prove the first statement observe that if
$Y$ had genus $\geq 2$, then there would
be two linearly independent holomorphic
$1$-forms $w_1,w_2$ of $C^{(2)}$,
obtained by pull-back of $1$-forms of $Y$,
such that $w_1\wedge w_2 = 0$. On the other hand
we have a commutative diagram of isomorphisms
\[
\xymatrix{
{\bigwedge^2 H^0(C^{(2)},\Omega^1)}
\ar[rr]^-{w_1\wedge w_2\mapsto w_1\wedge w_2}
\ar[rd]_\alpha &&
H^0(C^{(2)},\Omega^2)\\
& {\bigwedge^2 H^0(C,\Omega^1)}\ar[ru]_\beta
}
\]
where $\alpha$ is induced by pull-back via the
diagonal embedding $C\to C^{(2)}$ and $\beta$
is defined by $w_1\wedge w_2\mapsto
\frac{1}{4}(\pi_1^*w_1\wedge\pi_2^*w_2+
\pi_2^*w_1\wedge\pi_1^*w_2)$, with $\pi_i:C^2\to C$
the projections onto the two factors.
Thus such $1$-forms cannot exist and $Y$
must have genus at most one.
To prove the second statement, assume
that a fiber $F$ of $f$ is numerically equivalent
to a rational linear combination of
$\Delta$ and $K$.
If $Y$ has genus one then we have the
following commutative diagram
\[
\xymatrix{
C\ar[r]^-\imath\ar[d]^-{\alb_C} & C^{(2)}\ar[r]^-f\ar[d]^-{\alb_{C^{(2)}}} & Y\ar[d]^-{\alb_Y}_-\cong\\
\Alb(C)\ar[r]^-{\alb_\imath}_-\cong & \Alb(C^{(2)})\ar[r]^-{\alb_f} & \Alb(Y)\\
}
\]
where $\alb_\imath$ and $\alb_f$
are induced by the universal property of
the Albanese morphism and $\alb_\imath$
is an isomorphism by Proposition~\ref{pic}.
Let $\Theta$ be the theta divisor of $\Alb(C^{(2)})$.
Recall that both $\alb_{C^{(2)}}(\Delta)$ and
$\alb_{C^{(2)}}(K)$ are numerically equivalent to
a multiple of $\Theta^{g-1}$.
By our assumption on $F$ we deduce that
$\alb_{C^{(2)}}(F)\equiv c\,\Theta^{g-1}$. Moreover
$c$ is non-zero since $F$ cannot be
contracted by $\alb_{C^{(2)}}$.
But this gives a contradiction, since
$\alb_f\circ\alb_{C^{(2)}}$ contracts $F$, while
$\alb_f(\Theta^{g-1})$ cannot be a point, being the
image of $\alpha_Y\circ f\circ\imath$.
\end{proof}
For a proof of the following lemma see also
~\cite{BHPV}*{Lemma III.8.3}.
\begin{lemma}
\label{covering}
Let $f\colon S\to\mathbb {\mathbb C}$ be a proper
morphism and let $nF$ be a multiple fiber
of $f$ with multiplicity $n>1$.
Then ${\mathcal O}_F(F)$ is torsion non-trivial.
\end{lemma}
\begin{proof}
We first show that $\mathcal L={\mathcal O}_S(F)$ is not trivial.
Consider the closure of the graph of $f$
in $S\times \mathbb P^1$, let
$\bar S$ be its minimal resolution and
$\bar f:\bar S\to \mathbb P^1$
be the fibration given by the projection
to the second factor.
Assume by contradiction that $F\sim 0$
in $S$. Thus $F\sim \alpha F'$ in $\bar S$,
where $F'$ is a divisor with support contained
in $\bar S-S=\bar f^{-1}(\infty)$ and $\alpha$
is a positive integer.
Since $h^0(\bar S, nF)=2$ with $n>1$, then
$h^0(\bar S, F)=1$, giving a contradiction.
The line bundle $\mathcal L$ thus defines a
non-trivial \'etale cyclic covering
$\eta\colon S'\to S$.
By taking the Stein factorization of $f\circ\eta$
we get a commutative diagram
\[
\xymatrix{
S'\ar[r]^-\eta\ar[d]^-{f'} & S\ar[d]^-f\\
B\ar[r]^-\nu & {\mathbb C},
}
\]
where $f'$ is a morphism with connected
fibers and $\nu$ is a finite map.
If $\mathcal L|_{F}={\mathcal O}_F(F)$ is trivial, then
$\nu$ is an
\'etale covering of $\mathbb {\mathbb C}$,
since the restriction of $\mathcal L$
to any fiber of $f$ is trivial.
Thus $\nu$ is the trivial covering and $B$
has $n$ connected components,
a contradiction since $\eta$ is non-trivial.
Since $\mathcal L^{\otimes n}$ is trivial,
then clearly its restriction to $F$ is trivial.
This concludes the proof.
\end{proof}
\begin{lemma}\label{triv}
Let $C$ be a non-hyperelliptic
curve of genus $g = (k-1)^2>1$
which is complete intersection
of a quadric cone with a degree $k$
surface of ${\mathbb P}^3$. Then the divisor
$\Gamma$ of $C^{(2)}$,
corresponding to the $g_k^1$
of $C$ defined by the ruling of
the cone, is not semiample.
\end{lemma}
\begin{proof}
We first show that the line bundle
${\mathcal O}_\Gamma(\Gamma)$ is trivial.
Indeed let $Q_t\subseteq{\mathbb P}^3\times
\mathbb A^1$ be a family of quadrics
whose central fiber $Q_0$ is the cone
containing $C$ and whose general fiber
is a smooth quadric. Let $\mathcal D$
be a divisor of ${\mathbb P}^3\times\mathbb A^1$
which cuts out on the general fiber $Q_t$
a smooth curve $C_t$ of type $(k,k)$ with two
simple $g_k^1$ and $C$ on $Q_0$.
The family $\mathcal C\to\mathbb A^1$
of curves $C_t$ gives a family
$\mathcal C^{(2)}\to\mathbb A^1$
whose general fiber is $C_t^{(2)}$.
On any such fiber there are two
curves $\Gamma_t$, $\Gamma_t'$
corresponding to the two $g_k^1$
on $C_t$. The line bundle
${\mathcal O}_{\Gamma_t}(\Gamma_t')$ is
trivial, by Lemma~\ref{gamma},
and its limit is ${\mathcal O}_\Gamma(\Gamma)$,
which proves the claim.
Assume now, by contradiction, that
$\Gamma$ is semiample.
Since $\Gamma^2=0$,
a multiple $n\Gamma$ defines a morphism
$f\colon C^{(2)}\to B$, where $B$ is a curve. Moreover,
after possibly normalizing, we can assume $B$
to be smooth. Now, let $f=\nu\circ\varphi$ be
the Stein factorization of $f$, where
$\varphi\colon C^{(2)}\to Y$ is a morphism with
connected fibers. By Lemma~\ref{covering}
and the fact that ${\mathcal O}_\Gamma(\Gamma)$ is
trivial we deduce that $\Gamma$ is a union
of fibers of $\varphi$. Moreover
both the hypotheses of Lemma~\ref{fib} are satisfied,
thus $Y$ must be a smooth rational curve.
Let $H$ be the curve of
$C^{(2)}$ which is the image of the curve
$\{p\}\times C$ via $\pi$.
The equality $\Gamma\cdot H = k-1$ implies
that $\varphi|_H$ is a covering of $Y$ whose degree
$d$ divides $k-1$.
Thus $C\cong H$ would admit two maps to
${\mathbb P}^1$ of degrees $k$ and $d$, respectively.
Being the degrees coprime, the curve $C$
would be birational to a curve of bi-degree $(k,d)$
of ${\mathbb P}^1\times{\mathbb P}^1$, whose genus is smaller
than $g$, a contradiction.
\end{proof}
\begin{remark}\label{rem1}
If $D$ is a prime divisor on a projective
surface $X$ such that $|D|$
has dimension $0$ then $D$ is semiample
if and only if $\dim |nD| > 0$ for some $n>1$.
Indeed the ``only if'' part is obvious, while
the other implication follows from the fact
that the fixed divisor of $|nD|$ is $mD$
for some $m<n$ and thus the base locus of
$|(n-m)D|$ is at most zero-dimensional and
one concludes by Zariski-Fujita theorem
~\cite[Remark 2.1.32]{La}
\end{remark}
\begin{proof}[Proof of Theorem~\ref{teo-1}]
We show that $(i)\Rightarrow (ii)$ holds.
Assume that the extended canonical ring
$R := R(\Delta,K)$ is finitely generated.
We begin to show that any divisor
whose class is in $\Nef(\Delta,K)$
is semiample. By Proposition~\ref{ray-1}
it suffices to show that $2K+(5-2k)\Delta$
is semiample, or equivalently that the divisor
$\Gamma$ defined by a $g_k^1$ of $C$
is semiample, by Lemma~\ref{gamma}.
Let $f_1,\dots,f_r$ be a minimal system of
homogeneous generators of $R$
with respect to the ${\mathbb Z}^2$-grading
and let $w_i := \deg(f_i)\in{\mathbb Z}^2$ be
the degree of $f_i$ for any $i$.
Let $f_1\in R$ be a generator whose
degree belongs to the ray generated by
$[\Gamma]$ and let $D$ be a
very ample divisor of the form $a\Gamma+b K$, with $a,b>0$
whose class $w$ lies in the interior of the cone
\begin{minipage}{0.5\textwidth}
\[
\bigcap_{i=2}^r{\rm cone}(w_1,w_i)
\cap {\rm cone}(w_1,[K])
\]
\end{minipage
\begin{minipage}{0.5\textwidth}
\begin{center}
\begin{tikzpicture}[scale=0.65]
\draw[-,thick] (0,0) -- (2,0) node[below]{$w_r$};
\draw[-,thick] (0,0) -- (-2.2,1.1) node[left] {$w_1$};
\draw[-,color=blue] (0,0) -- (0,1.8);
\node[right] at (-0.6,2.2){$[K]$};
\foreach \x/\y in {-1/1.5,-1.5/1.3,-0.5/1.7} \draw[-,color=blue] (0,0) to (\x,\y);
\foreach \x/\y in {1/1.5,1.5/1.3, 1.8/0.8} \draw[-,color=blue] (0,0) to (\x,\y);
\fill[black] (0,0) circle (2pt);
\fill[black] (2,0) circle (2pt);
\fill[black] (-2.2,1.1) circle (2pt);
\fill[blue] (-1,1.5) circle (2pt);
\fill[blue] (-1.5,1.3) circle (2pt);
\fill[blue] (-0.5,1.7) circle (2pt);
\fill[blue] (1,1.5) circle (2pt);
\fill[blue] (1.5,1.3) circle (2pt);
\fill[blue] (1.8,0.8) circle (2pt);
\fill[blue] (0,1.8) circle (2pt);
\node[above] at (-1,1.5) {};
\node[above, red] at (-1.7,1.3) {$w$};
\node[above] at (-1,1.5) {$w_2$};
\node[above] at (1.7,1.3) {$w_i$};
\end{tikzpicture}
\end{center}
\end{minipage}
\noindent If $\Gamma$ is not semiample, then
any section of $R_w = H^0(C^{(2)},D)$
is divisible by $f_1$, a contradiction.
Thus we showed that $\Gamma$ is semiample
and as a consequence of Lemma~\ref{triv}
the curve $C$ has two $g_k^1$. We denote
the corresponding curves of $C^{(2)}$ by
$\Gamma$ and $\Gamma'$.
A multiple of $\Gamma$
defines a morphism $f\colon C^{(2)}\to B$
onto a smooth curve $B$ whose Stein factorization is
the following
\[
\xymatrix{
C^{(2)}\ar[r]^{\varphi}\ar[rd]_{f} & Y\ar[d]\\
& B.
}
\]
Two fibers of $\varphi$ are $n\Gamma$ and $m\Gamma'$
for some positive rational numbers $n,m$. Since
$\Gamma$ is numerically equivalent to $\Gamma'$
by Lemma~\ref{gamma}, then $n=m$.
Moreover by Lemma~\ref{fib} the curve $Y$
is rational, so that $n\Gamma$ is linearly equivalent
to $n\Gamma'$. This implies that the class
of $\Gamma-\Gamma'$ is torsion non-trivial
in $\Pic^0(C^{(2)})$
and thus the same holds for
\begin{align*}
2\eta_C
& =
\text{ramification of $g_k^1$ - ramification of ${g_k^1}'$}\\
& =
\imath^*(\Gamma-\Gamma').
\end{align*}
We now show that $(ii)\Rightarrow (i)$ holds.
First of all observe that if $\eta_C$ is torsion
non-trivial, then the same holds for
$\Gamma-\Gamma'$ by the above equalities
and the fact that $\imath^*$ is an isomorphism.
In this case $n\Gamma\sim n\Gamma'$ for
some positive integer $n$ and this implies
that $|n\Gamma|$ is base point free, being
$\Gamma^2=0$. Thus $\Gamma$ is semiample.
Hence, if $L\subseteq{\mathbb Z}^2$ is the submonoid
generated by the integer points of the cone
${\rm cone}(2K+3\Delta,2K+(5-2k)\Delta)$,
the following subalgebra
\[
S := \bigoplus_{(a,b)\in L}H^0(C^{(2)},a\Delta+bK)
\]
of $R$ is finitely generated
by~\cite[Lemma 4.3.3.4]{ADHL}.
The homogeneous elements of $R$
which do not belong to $S$ are sections
of Riemann-Roch spaces
$H^0(C^{(2)},D)$ with $D\cdot\Delta < 0$.
Hence any such section is divisible by
the generator $f_\Delta$ of $R$ which is a defining
section for $\Delta$. Thus we conclude that
$R$ is generated by $S$ and $f_\Delta$
and the statement follows.
\end{proof}
\begin{remark}
\label{ch}
Over an algebraically closed field ${\mathbb K}$ of positive
characteristic the statement of Theorem~\ref{teo-1}
must be modified as follows: the algebra
$R(\Delta,K)$ is finitely generated if and
only if $\eta_C$ is torsion. Indeed if $\eta_C$
is trivial, then ${\mathcal O}_\Gamma(\Gamma)$ is trivial
as well as shown in the proof of Lemma~\ref{triv},
thus $\Gamma$ is semiample by~\cite[Theorem 0.2]{Ke}.
Moreover, if ${\mathbb K}$ is the algebraic closure
of a finite field, then $\eta_C$ is always
torsion and thus $R(\Delta,K)$ is always
finitely generated.
The conclusion of Lemma~\ref{covering}
is no longer true in positive characteristic. Indeed in
this case the algebraic fundamental group of the
affine line ${\mathbb K}$ is not trivial and thus there is no
contradiction. For example, in characteristic $p>0$,
if $C$ is the curve of ${\mathbb K}^2$ defined by the equation
$x_1^p-x_1=x_2$, then the projection onto the second
factor defines a non-trivial \'etale covering of ${\mathbb K}$.
\end{remark}
\begin{remark}
We observe that the locus of smooth curves of genus
$(k-1)^2 > 1$ which admit two $g_k^1$ has one component
of maximal dimension which consists of curves of
type $(k,k)$ on a smooth quadric $Q$.
Indeed by~\cite{AC} the only
other component which could have bigger dimension
would consist of curves $C$ admitting an involution.
A parameter count shows that for our curves this
component has smaller dimension.
Moreover any smooth curve $C$ of type
$(k,k)$ on $Q$ admits exactly two $g_k^1$.
Indeed let $S = \{p_1,\dots,p_k\}$ be a set of
$k$ distinct points with $p_1+\dots+p_k\in g_k^1$.
By the Riemann-Roch theorem $S$ is in Cayley-Bacharach
configuration with respect to the curves of
type $(k-2,k-2)$. It follows that all the
points of $S$ are collinear. Indeed, let
$\ell$ be the line through the first two points
$p_1,p_2$, let $H$ be a general hyperplane
which contains $\ell$ and let $q\in S\setminus\{p_1,p_2\}$.
Take a union $\Lambda$ of $k-3$
hyperplanes through all the points of
$S\setminus\{p_1,p_2,q\}$ and such that
$q\notin\Lambda$.
Then $H\cup \Lambda$ cuts out on $Q$
a curve of type
$(k-2,k-2)$ which, by the Cayley-Bacharach
configuration, must pass through $q$.
Hence $q\in H$ and by the generality
assumption on $H$ we deduce $q\in\ell$.
\end{remark}
\section{The grid family}
\label{grid-fam}
In this section we study families of curves of type $(k,k)$
on a smooth quadric $Q = {\mathbb P}^1\times{\mathbb P}^1$
such that the class of the difference of the two
$g_k^1$ induced by the two rulings is
$n$-torsion. We prove that $n\geq k$
and construct the family with $n=k$.
\begin{definition}
\label{grid}
Given two effective
divisors $L_1$ and $L_2$ of $Q$ of type
$(k,0)$ and $(0,k)$ respectively, the {\em grid
linear system} defined by $L_1$ and $L_2$ is
the linear system of curves of $Q$ of
bi-degree $(k,k)$ which pass through the
complete intersection $L_1\cap L_2$.
The {\em grid family}
\[
\mathcal G_k
\subseteq\mathcal F_k
\]
is the family
of all curves of type $(k,k)$ which belong to some
grid linear system.
\end{definition}
Observe that if $C$ is a smooth curve in $\mathcal G_k$
and $\eta_C\in \Pic^0(C)$ is the class of the difference of the
two $g_k^1$ cut out by the two rulings then $\eta_C^{\otimes k}$
is trivial. This justifies the inclusion
$\mathcal G_k\subseteq\mathcal F_k^{\rm tor}$.
Any curve $C$ in $\mathcal G_k$
admits an equation of the form
\begin{equation}
\label{equ-fam}
f_1(x_0,x_1)g_2(y_0,y_1)+g_1(x_0,x_1)f_2(y_0,y_1)
=
0,
\end{equation}
where $f_1, f_2, g_1$ and $g_2$ are homogeneous
polynomials of degree $k$. Indeed it is enough to
prove the claim for a curve $C$ in a grid family
where both $L_1$ and $L_2$ consist of
distinct lines and then conclude by specialization
that the same holds for any
curve $C$ of $\mathcal G_k$.
Let $h=0$ be an equation for $C$ and
let $f_i = 0$ be an equation for $L_i$, for $i=1,2$.
By the equality
\[
V(h,f_1) = V(f_1,f_2),
\]
the fact that the two ideals $(h,f_1)$ and $(f_1,f_2)$ are both
radical and saturated with respect to the
irrelevant ideal $(x_0,x_1)\cap (y_0,y_1)$ of $Q$,
we deduce that the equality $(h,f_1) = (f_1,f_2)$
holds. The claim follows since $h$ has bi-degree $(k,k)$.
Observe that the general element of $\mathcal G_k$ is
irreducible and smooth.
\begin{proposition}
The {\em grid family} $\mathcal G_k$
has dimension $4k-1$.
\end{proposition}
\begin{proof}
The projectivization of the set of homogeneous polynomials of
bidegree $(k,k)$ of type $f(x_0,x_1)g(y_0,y_1)$ can be identified
with the image $\mathcal S$ of the Segre embedding of
${\mathbb P}^k\times{\mathbb P}^k\to{\mathbb P}^N$,
where $N={k^2+2k}$.
Thus, a curve in $\mathcal G_k$ can be identified
with a point of the $1$-secant variety ${\rm Sec}(\mathcal S)$
of $\mathcal S$.
By~\cite[Theorem 1.4]{CS} the dimension of
${\rm Sec}(\mathcal S)$ is $4k-1$ and the
statement follows.
\end{proof}
\begin{lemma}
\label{composed}
Let $C\in\mathcal F_k$ and let $D$ be a divisor
of $C$ cut out by one of the two rulings. Then,
for any $1\leq n\leq k-1$, the linear system $|nD|$
is composed with the pencil $|D|$.
\end{lemma}
\begin{proof}
To prove the statement it is enough to show that
$h^0(C,nD) = n+1$ for $1\leq n\leq k-1$.
Let $Q = {\mathbb P}^1\times{\mathbb P}^1$. Without loss of generality
we can assume that $D$ is cut out by the first ruling
of $Q$, so that we have the following exact sequence
of sheaves
\[
\xymatrix@1{
0\ar[r]
&
{\mathcal O}_Q(-k+n,-k)\ar[r]
&
{\mathcal O}_Q(n,0)\ar[r]
&
{\mathcal O}_C(nD)\ar[r]
&
0.
}
\]
Taking cohomology, using the vanishing of the higher
cohomology groups of the middle sheaf, the Serre's
duality theorem and the hypothesis on $n$ we deduce
the following equalities:
\[
h^1(C,nD) = h^0(Q,{\mathcal O}_Q(k-n-2,k-2))= (k-n-1)(k-1).
\]
By the adjunction formula $C$ has genus $(k-1)^2$.
Thus by the above and the Riemann-Roch formula
we conclude
\[
h^0(C,nD)
=
nk+1-(k-1)^2+(k-n-1)(k-1)
=
n+1
\]
and the statement follows.
\end{proof}
\begin{proposition}
\label{torsion}
Let $C$ be a smooth curve of type
$(k,k)$ on $Q$ and let $\eta_C$
be the class of the difference of the two $g_k^1$.
Then $\eta_C$ has order $\geq k$ and the
following are equivalent:
\begin{enumerate}
\item
$\eta_C$ has order $k$;
\item
the curve $C$ belongs to the grid family $\mathcal G_k$.
\end{enumerate}
\end{proposition}
\begin{proof}
We first show that $\eta_C$ has order $\geq k$.
Let $D_1$ be a divisor in the first $g_k^1$ and let
$D_2$ be a divisor in the second $g_k^1$.
Let $n<k$ be a positive integer.
By Lemma~\ref{composed} the linear system
$|nD_i|$ is composed with $|D_i|$ for any $i$.
Thus the linear equivalence $nD_1\sim nD_2$ would
imply that for any set of $n$ lines of the first ruling
there are $n$ lines of the second ruling which cut
out the same set of points on $C$. This cannot be
since such set of $nk$ points would lie on a grid
with $n^2$ points.
This proves the claim.
We now show that $(i)\Rightarrow (ii)$ holds.
By the exact sequence of sheaves
\[
\xymatrix@1{
0\ar[r]
&
{\mathcal O}_Q(0,-k)\ar[r]
&
{\mathcal O}_Q(k,0)\ar[r]
&
{\mathcal O}_C(kD_1)\ar[r]
&
0
}
\]
the fact that $h^0 = 0$, $h^1=k-1$ for the first sheaf
and $h^0 = k+1$, $h^1 = 0$ for the second sheaf we
get the equality $h^0(C,{\mathcal O}_C(kD_1)) = 2k$.
By hypothesis $|kD_1| = |kD_2|$ holds and by the above
calculation the linear system is a projective space of dimension
$2k-1$. Let $\mathcal H_i\subseteq |kD_1|\cong{\mathbb P}^{2k-1}$
be the projectivization of the $k$-th symmetric
power of the vector space $H^0(C,D_i)$.
Since both $\mathcal H_1$ and $\mathcal H_2$
have dimension $k$, their intersection
$\mathcal H_1\cap\mathcal H_2$ is at least
one-dimensional. A point of this intersection
corresponds to a divisor $D$ which is cut out
on $C$ by $k$ lines of the first ruling
and by $k$ lines of the second ruling.
This proves the claim.
The implication $(ii)\Rightarrow (i)$ is obvious.
\end{proof}
\section{Density of the torsion locus}
\label{density}
We define $\mathcal F_k$
to be the open subset of the Hilbert scheme of the smooth
curves of type $(k,k)$ of ${\mathbb P}^1\times{\mathbb P}^1$.
Let $\pi\colon \mathcal C\to\mathcal F_k$ be the universal
family, let $\mathcal H = R^1\pi_*{\mathbb C}$ be the associated
Hodge bundle whose fiber
over a point $C\in\mathcal F_k$ is the
cohomology group $H^1(C,{\mathbb C})$ and
let $\mathcal H^{1,0}$ be the subbundle
of $\mathcal H$ whose fiber over
$C$ is $H^{1,0}(C)$. We recall that
the jacobian family $\mathcal J\to\mathcal F_k$
can be defined as
\begin{equation}
\label{jac}
\mathcal J
=
\frac{\mathcal H}{\mathcal H^{1,0}+R^1\pi_*{\mathbb Z}}.
\end{equation}
Given a point $t\in\mathcal F_k$ we denote by
$C_t$ the fiber of $\pi$ over $t$ and
by $\nu_t = \mathcal L_1\otimes\mathcal L_2^{-1}
\in J(C_t)$ the class of the difference
of the two $g_k^1$ cut out by the two rulings.
This gives a normal function $\nu\colon\mathcal F_k
\to \mathcal J$ defined by $t\mapsto\nu_t$.
We now consider a $\mathcal C^\infty$ trivialization
$\varphi$
of the jacobian family over an open, simply connected
subset $\mathcal U$ of $\mathcal F_k$:
\[
\xymatrix{
\mathcal J
\ar[r]^-\varphi &
\mathcal U\times\dfrac {R^1\pi_\ast\mathbb R} {R^1\pi_\ast \mathbb Z}
=
\mathcal U\times\mathbb T,
}
\]
where $\mathbb T$ is the real torus
${\mathbb R}^{2g}/{\mathbb Z}^{2g}$.
We let ${\rm pr}_2\colon\mathcal U\times\mathbb T
\to\mathbb T$ be the projection on the second factor
and let
\[
\eta\colon{\mathcal U}\to\mathbb T
\qquad
t\mapsto {\rm pr}_2(\varphi(\nu(t))).
\]
We will show that, for any $k\geq 3$, the image
of $\eta$ contains a non-empty open subset.
Our strategy will be to prove that
the fibers of $\eta$ are complex subvarieties
of $\mathcal U$, that $\eta$ has a fiber
of the expected real dimension
$8k-2 = \dim \mathcal F_k - \dim\mathbb T$
and we conclude by Proposition~\ref{fiber}
(see also the argument in the proof of~\cite[Proposition 3.4]{CPP}).
\begin{proposition}
\label{fiber}
Let $V\subseteq X$ be an inclusion of complex manifolds,
$Y$ be a real manifold and
$\eta\colon X\to Y$ be a $\mathcal C^\infty$
map whose fibers are complex subvarieties
of $X$. Assume that there is a point $p\in V$
such that the following hold:
\begin{enumerate}
\item
the differential $d\eta_p$ is surjective,
\item
the fiber of the restriction $\eta|_V$ over $\eta(p)$
has dimension $\dim V - \dim Y\geq 0$.
\end{enumerate}
Then $\eta(V)$ contains
a non-empty open subset of $Y$.
\end{proposition}
\begin{proof}
Let $F$ be the fiber of $\eta$ over $\eta(p)$
and let $U$ be a coordinate neighbourhood of $p$
such that the restriction $\eta|_U$ is a submersion.
Let $d = \dim V - \dim Y$. After possibly
intersecting $V$ with $d$ general smooth
complex hypersurfaces passing through $p$
we can reduce to the case $d = 0$.
Thus, after possibly shrinking $U$
we can assume $F\cap V\cap U = \{p\}$.
For $q$ in a sufficiently small neighbourhood
$W$ of $\eta(p)$ the intersection number
$\eta^{-1}(q)\cap V$ does not change
by~\cite[Pag.\,664]{GH}, so that the intersection is
non-empty. Then $\eta(V)$ contains $W$
and the statement follows.
\end{proof}
\begin{proposition}
The fibers of the map $\eta$ are complex varieties.
\end{proposition}
\begin{proof}
We restrict the Hodge and the jacobian bundle
to the simply connected open subset $\mathcal U$
of $\mathcal F_k$,
where the family is topologically trivial.
Let $t_0\in \mathcal U$ be a distinguished point
and let $C = C_{t_0}$ be the corresponding
curve. We construct the following
commutative diagram
\[
\xymatrix{
\mathcal U\ar@{=}[d]\ar[r]^-{\tilde\nu}
& \mathcal H_{\mathcal U}\ar[r]^-\cong\ar[d]
& \mathcal U\times H^1(C,{\mathbb C})\ar[d]\ar[r]
& H^1(C,{\mathbb C})\ar[d]\\
\mathcal U\ar[r]^-{\nu|_\mathcal U}
& \mathcal J_{\mathcal U}\ar[r]^-\varphi
& \mathcal U\times\mathbb T\ar[r]
& \mathbb T
}
\]
where $\tilde\nu$ is a lifting of the restriction
$\nu|_{\mathcal U}$ and the maps in the top row
are complex analytic morphisms.
Observe that, given $x\in \mathbb T$, we have
\[
\eta^{-1}(x)=\{t\in\mathcal U: \tilde \nu(t)-\tilde x+c\in\mathcal H^{1,0}\},
\]
where the projection of $\tilde x$ to $\mathcal J$ is $x$
and $c\in H^1(C,{\mathbb Z})$.
This implies that $\eta^{-1}(x)$
is a complex subvariety of $\mathcal U$
since $\mathcal H^{1,0}$ is a
complex subbundle of $\mathcal H$.
\end{proof}
\begin{proof}[Proof of Theorem~\ref{teo-2}]
We will start proving that the image of the map $\eta$
contains a non-empty open subset of $\mathbb T$.
We consider the map
\[
\phi\colon\mathcal J_{\mathcal U}\to \mathbb T
\]
which is composition of the trivialization $\varphi$
with the projection onto the second factor.
Observe that the differential of $\phi$ has
maximal rank at any point. By applying
Proposition~\ref{fiber} to the map
$\phi$, the subvariety
$V = \nu|_{\mathcal U}(\mathcal U)$ of $\mathcal J$
and the fiber $\mathcal G_k$ of the restriction
$\phi|_V$ we deduce that $\eta(V)$ contains
a non-empty open subset.
Observe that the trivialization $\varphi$
can be taken real analytic, since it is
obtained by taking the real part of the
complex analytic isomorphism coming
from the trivialization of the Hodge bundle.
By Sard theorem the set of non-critical values
of $\phi$ is an open subset in the analytic
topology. Since $\phi$ admits an analytic continuation
on any simple arc in $\mathcal J$, its set
of non-critical points is dense in the analytic
topology.
We conclude by observing that the set
of torsion points of $\mathbb T$ is dense
and $\mathcal F_k^{\rm tor}$ is the preimage
of this set via $\eta = \phi\circ\nu$.
\end{proof}
\section{Hyperelliptic curves}
\label{hyp}
In this section we prove a density
theorem for hyperelliptic curves. This result
has an independent interest and is proved in
the spirit of Griffiths computations of the
infinitesimal invariant~\cite{Gr}.
As an application to our problem, this result
provides an alternative proof for Theorem~\ref{teo-2}
in case $g=4$.
Let $\pi\colon\mathcal C\to\mathcal U$ be a versal family
of hyperelliptic curves of genus $g > 1$, where $\mathcal U$
is simply connected of dimension $2g-1$.
We denote by $j\in\Aut(\mathcal C)$ the hyperelliptic
involution and by
$\mathcal J\to\mathcal U$ the jacobian
family. We consider the Abel-Jacobi map
\[
\nu\colon \mathcal C \to \mathcal J,\quad
x\mapsto\int_{j(x)}^x.
\]
If we take $\pi^\ast \mathcal J\to \mathcal C$ the pull-back
of the Jacobian family on $\mathcal C,$
we may consider $\nu$ as a normal function.
As in Section~\ref{density} we consider a $\mathcal C^\infty$
trivialization of the jacobian family
$\mathcal J\cong \mathcal U\times \mathbb T$,
where $\mathbb T\cong J(C)$, to construct a map
\[
\gamma\colon\mathcal C\to\mathbb T.
\]
\begin{theorem}
\label{diff}
If $p\in C$ is not a Weierstrass point, then the
differential of $\gamma$ at $p$ is surjective.
\end{theorem}
Our strategy is as follows. For any holomorphic
form $\omega\in H^0(C,\Omega_C)$ we show that
there is a curve $r(t)$ in $\mathcal C$ such that
$r(0) = p$ and $d\gamma_p(r'(0))\cdot\omega$
is non-zero. To this aim we produce $r(t)$
accordingly to the order $n$ of vanishing of $w$
at $p$. Since the divisor ${\rm div}(w)$ is $j$-invariant,
then it is natural to consider $D = p+j(p)$.
We thus have a filtration
\begin{equation}
\label{filt}
H^0(C,\Omega_C)
=
L^0\supseteq L^1\supseteq...\supseteq L^{g-1}\supseteq L^g=0,
\end{equation}
where $L^k$ is the Riemann-Roch space
$H^0(C,\Omega_C(-kD))$. Given $\omega\in L^k
\setminus L^{k+1}$, with $k>0$, we construct $\zeta = \partial(f)
\in H^1(C,T_C)^j$ as in Subsection~\ref{def}, where $f\in
H^0(Z,{\mathcal O}_Z)$. The one-dimensional family
\[
\mathcal C_\zeta\to\Delta
\]
defined by $\zeta$, plus a choice of a smooth
section through the point $p$ in the family, defines a curve
$r(t)$ in $\mathcal C$. We show that the family
is equipped with a $\mathcal C^\infty$
$1$-form $\Theta$ such that the restriction
of the $(1,0)$-part $\Theta^{1,0}$
to the central fiber $C$
admits a local expansion at $p$ of the
form $w + \tilde f(z)dt + o(t)$, where $z$ is a coordinate
in $C$, $\tilde f|_Z=f$ and $t\in\Delta$. We finally prove
\[
d\gamma_p(r'(0))\cdot\omega
=
\lim_{t\to 0}\frac{1}{t}\left(\int_{\Gamma_t}\Theta_t-\int_{\Gamma_0}\omega\right)
=
2f(p)\neq 0,
\]
where $\Gamma_t$ is a path between $r(t)$
and $j(r(t))$. When $k=0$ we choose $r(t)$
to be a path within the central fiber $C$,
we write $\omega$ locally as $h(z)dz$
and prove the equality
\[
d\gamma_p(r'(0))\cdot\omega
=
\lim_{t\to 0}\frac{1}{t}\int_{p}^{r(t)}\omega
=
h(0)\neq 0.
\]
\subsection{Deformation of curves}
\label{def}
We recall first a result on deformation and on
extension of line bundles
which will be applied to hyperelliptic curves (see also~\cite{CP} and~\cite{R}).
Let $C$ be a smooth curve of genus $g>1$ and
let $T_C$ and $\Omega_C$ be respectively the holomorphic
tangent bundle and the canonical line bundle of $C$.
Fix a non trivial $\omega\in H^0(C,\Omega_C)$ and
let $Z$ be the canonical divisor associated to $\omega.$
The form $\omega$ defines the following exact sequence
\[
\xymatrix@1{
0\ar[r] & T_C\ar[r]^{\omega}& {\mathcal O}_C\ar[r]& {\mathcal O}_Z\ar[r]& 0.
}
\]
Passing to the long exact sequence in cohomology
we obtain
\[
\xymatrix@C=20pt{
0\ar[r]& {\mathbb C}\cong H^0(C,{\mathcal O}_C)\ar[r]&
H^0(Z,{\mathcal O}_Z)\ar[r]^\partial& H^1(C,T_C)
\ar[r]^{\omega}& H^1(C,{\mathcal O}_C).
}
\]
Given an element $f\in H^0(Z,{\mathcal O}_Z)$
its image $\zeta=\partial(f)$ defines an
extension of ${\mathcal O}_C$ by $T_C$ via the
isomorphism $H^1(C,T_C)\cong
{\rm Ext}^1({\mathcal O}_C,T_C)$
\[
\xymatrix@1{
0\ar[r] & T_C \ar[r] & E_{\zeta}\ar[r] & {\mathcal O}_C\ar[r] & 0.
}
\]
Taking tensor product with $\Omega_C$
and recalling that $T_C$ is dual with $\Omega_C$
we get the following exact sequence
\begin{equation} \label{zeta}
\xymatrix@1{
0\ar[r] &{\mathcal O}_C\ar[r] & E_{\zeta}\otimes \Omega_C\ar[r] &
\Omega_C\ar[r]& 0,
}
\end{equation}
which passing to the long exact sequence in cohomology
gives the following sequence
whose coboundary
is the cup product with $\zeta$:
\[
\xymatrix@C=20pt{
0\ar[r] & {\mathbb C}\cong H^0(C,{\mathcal O}_C)\ar[r]&
H^0(C,E_\zeta\otimes \Omega_C)\ar[r]^-k &
H^0(C,\Omega_C)\ar[r]^-{\zeta}\ar[r]&
H^1(C,{\mathcal O}_C).
}
\]
Since $\zeta\in\ker(\omega)$, or equivalently
the cup product $\zeta\cdot \omega$ vanishes,
there exists an element $\Omega\in
H^0(C,E_\zeta\otimes \Omega_C)$ such that
$k(\Omega)=\omega$.
Now we consider the commutative diagram
\[
\xymatrix@1{
& 0\ar[d] & 0\ar[d] & H^0(C,{\mathcal O}_C)\ar[d]^-\zeta\\
0\ar[r]\ar[d]
& H^0(C,{\mathcal O}_C)\ar[r]\ar[d]
& H^0(Z,{\mathcal O}_Z)\ar[d]^-\rho\ar[r]^-\partial
& H^1(C,T_C)\ar[d] \\
0\ar[r]\ar[d]
& H^0(C,E_\zeta\otimes \Omega_C)\ar[r]^-r\ar[d]^-k
& H^0(Z,E_\zeta\otimes \Omega_C|_Z)\ar[d]\ar[r]
& H^1(C,E_\zeta)\ar[d]\\
H^0(C,{\mathcal O}_C)\ar[r]^-\omega
& H^0(C,\Omega_C)\ar[r]
& H^0(Z,\Omega_C|_Z)\ar[r]
& H^1(C,{\mathcal O}_C)
}
\]
\vspace{0.2cm}
The restriction of the lifting $\Omega$ to $Z$
gives an element $r(\Omega)\in H^0(Z,E_\zeta\otimes \Omega_C|_Z)$
that by construction is in the image of the map
$\rho$, that is $\Omega=\rho(g)$
for some $g\in H^0(Z,{\mathcal O}_Z)$.
A diagram chase proves indeed that
$\partial (g)=\zeta$ holds.
Since $\ker(\partial)$ is isomorphic to ${\mathbb C}$,
we conclude that $f$ equals $g$ up to a constant.
This means that we can realize the function $f$
by a unique suitable lifting $\Omega$ of $\omega.$
We collect the discussion in the following lemma.
\begin{proposition}\label{coord}
Let $\omega$ be a non-zero element in
$H^0(C,\Omega_C)$ and let $Z$ be the
divisor of $\omega$.
Then for any $f\in H^0(Z,{\mathcal O}_Z)$
there is a unique
$\Omega\in H^0(C,E_{\zeta}\otimes \Omega_C)$
such that $r(\Omega)=\rho (f)$.
\end{proposition}
When we interpret $H^1(C,T_C)$
as the space of first order deformations of $C$,
so that $\zeta$ corresponds to a family
\[
\mathcal C_\zeta\to {\rm Spec}\, {\mathbb C}[\varepsilon],
\]
the isomorphism $H^1(C,T_C)\to
{\rm Ext}^1({\mathcal O}_C,\Omega_C)$
gives the identifications
$E_{\zeta}\cong T_{\mathcal C}|_{C}$
and $E_{\zeta}\otimes \Omega_C\cong\Omega_{\mathcal C}|_{C}.$
Therefore the sequence~\eqref{zeta}
is the cotangent sequence of the first order deformation.
In coordinates we may write
\begin{equation}
\label{Omega}
\omega= h(z)dz,\qquad \Omega=h(z)dz+\tilde f(z)dt,
\end{equation}
where $dt$ is the global section
of the cotangent $\Omega_{\mathcal C}|_{C}$
and $f=\tilde f|_Z$ is a section of $H^0(Z,{\mathcal O}_Z)$
such that $r(\Omega)=\rho (f)$.
\subsection{The normal function}
In this subsection we will specialize the previous
construction to hyperelliptic families.
First of all, given a hyperelliptic curve $C$ of genus $g>1$,
we consider the $j$-invariant subspace
\[
H^1(C,T_C)^{j}
\subseteq
H^1(C,T_C),
\]
which corresponds to the directions that are preserved
by the hyperelliptic involution $j$.
Since $j$ acts on $H^0(Z,{\mathcal O}_Z)$
as $f\mapsto f\circ j$
and it acts as $-1$ on $H^0(C,\Omega_C)$,
then $\partial(f) = \zeta$ is $j$-invariant if and only if
$f\circ j$ equals $-f$ up to a constant.
Let $p$ be a non-Weierstrass point of $C$ and
$\omega\in H^0(C,\Omega_C)$
be a holomorphic form which vanishes
with order $k>0$ at $p$,
that is $\omega\in L^k\setminus L^{k+1}$.
We now take $f_{\omega}\in H^0(Z,{\mathcal O}_Z)$, where $Z
= k(p+j(p)) + Z' = {\rm div}(\omega)$,
such that
\[
f_{\omega}(p)=1,\quad f_{\omega}(j(p))=-1,\quad f_{\omega}(p')=0 \text{ for } p'\in Z'.
\]
Given $\zeta_{\omega}=\partial(f_{\omega})$,
by the previous remark
we have $j(\zeta_{\omega})=\zeta_{\omega}.$
Thus there exists a smooth family of hyperelliptic curves
\begin{equation}
\pi\colon \mathcal C_\omega\to \Delta \label{curvamod},
\end{equation}
where $\Delta\subset \mathcal U$ is a disk, such that
$\pi^{-1}(0)=C$ and such that
the Kodaira-Spencer
class of the family is $\zeta_{\omega}$.
Let $\Omega_{\omega}$ be the section of
$E_{\zeta_{\omega}}\otimes \Omega_C$
associated to $f_{\omega}$ as in Lemma ~\ref{coord}.
By means of a trivialization of
the family we can construct a closed
differential $1$-form $\Theta$
on $\mathcal C_{\omega}$ which is invariant
with respect to the involution $j$ and
such that the restriction of the $(1,0)$-part
$\Theta^{(1,0)}$ to the central fiber equals
$\Omega_{\omega}$.
In local coordinates we can write
\[
\Theta(z,t)^{(1,0)}=\Omega_{\omega}+ o(t)=\omega+f_{\omega}(z)dt+o(t).
\]
We also assume to have a holomorphic section $r$
of $\pi_{\omega}$ such that $r(0)=p$ and define $r'= j(r).$
Moreover, we fix a differentiable map
\[
\Gamma(t,s):\Delta\times [0,1]\to \mathcal C_{\omega}
\]
such that $\Gamma(t,s)\in \pi^{-1}(t)$,
$\Gamma(t,0)=r'(t)$ and $\Gamma(t,1)=r(t).$
Observe that $\Gamma$ is a family of sections
connecting $r'$ and $r$.
We define the function
\[
g\colon\Delta\to {\mathbb C},\quad
t\mapsto
\int_{\Gamma_t} \Theta_{t}.
\]
Following Griffiths~\cite[(6.6)]{Gr} and using the fact that
the Gauss-Manin connection vanishes on $\Theta$,
we have that the derivative of $g$ at $0$
equals
$
d\gamma_p(r'(0))\cdot \omega.
$
\begin{proof}[Proof of Theorem~\ref{diff}]
With the previous notation,
given any $\omega\in H^0(C,\Omega_C)$
vanishing of order $k>0$ at $p$,
we consider the family $\pi_{\omega}$,
with its sections $r=r_{\omega}$ and $r'=j(r)$,
and $\Theta$ the corresponding differential form on
$\mathcal C_{\omega}$.
By the previous remark we have that
\[
d\gamma_p(r'(0))\cdot \omega=g'(0).
\]
We now compute the latter term:
\[
g(t)-g(0)=\int_{\Gamma_t} \Theta_{t}-\int_{\Gamma_0}
\Theta_{0}=\int_{\Gamma_t} \Theta_{t}-\int_{\Gamma_0} \omega.
\]
We call $r_t$ and $r'_t$
the arcs $r([0,t])$ and $r'([0,t])$ respectively.
Since $\Theta$ is closed, then $\Gamma^\ast(\Theta)$ is
exact and we have
$0= \int_{r'_t}\Theta_t+\int_{\Gamma_t}\Theta_t - \int_{r_t}\Theta_t-\int_{\Gamma_0}\Theta_t$,
hence
\[
g(t)-g(0)= \int_{r_t}\Theta_t- \int_{r'_t}\Theta_t=2\int_{r_t}\Theta_t,
\]
where the last equality is due to the fact
that $j^\ast(\Theta)=-\Theta.$
Finally, since $\Theta = \omega+f_{\omega}(z)dt + o(t)$,
by the fundamental theorem of calculus
we get
\[
\lim_{t\to 0}\frac{1}{t}\int_{r_t}\Theta_t
=
\lim_{t\to 0}\frac{1}{t}\int_{r_t}\Theta_t^{(1,0)}
=
f_{\omega}(p)\not=0.
\]
Thus $g'(0)\not=0$.
If $k=0$, that is $\omega$ does not vanish
at $p$, we will choose a loop $r(t)$ in $C$ with
$r(0)=p$
and we will compute the derivative
of the Abel-Jacobi map ${\rm AJ}$ on $C$.
First note that if we take a
Weierstrass point $q$ of $C$
we have
\[
{\rm AJ}(r(t)-j(r(t)))=2{\rm AJ}(r(t)-q).
\]
Take a coordinate
$z$ centered at $p$
such that $\omega(z)=h(z)dz$ with $h(0)\neq 0.$
Fix a loop $r(t)$ such that $z(r(t))=t$, then
\[
\lim_{t\to0}\frac{1}{t} \int_{q}^{r(t)}\omega=
\lim_{t\to 0}\frac{1}{t}\int_0^th(z)dz=h(0)
\]
and we complete our result.
\end{proof}
\begin{corollary}
\label{cor}
The locus of curves $C$ in $\mathcal M_4$
such that $\eta_C$ is a non-trivial torsion point is a
countable union of subvarieties
of complex dimension $\geq 5$
and the set of subvarieties of
dimension $5$ is dense in $\mathcal M_4$
in the analytic topology.
\end{corollary}
\begin{proof}
Let $\mathcal U$ be an open subset of $\mathcal M_4$
which intersects the hyperelliptic locus and let $\tilde{\mathcal U}$
be the moduli space of pairs $(C,g_3^1)$,
where $[C]\in \mathcal U$.
Let $\imath\colon\mathcal H\to\tilde{\mathcal U}$ be the
subvariety containing pairs where $C$ is hyperelliptic.
Given a universal family
$\pi: \mathcal C\to \tilde{\mathcal U}$,
we construct the following commutative diagram
\[
\xymatrix{
\imath^*\mathcal C\ar[rrr]^-{(C,p)\mapsto [j(p)-p]}\ar[d]
&&& \mathcal J\ar@{=}[d]\ar[rd]\\
\mathcal C\ar[d]^-\pi\ar[rrr]^-{(C,g_3^1)\mapsto \eta_C}
&&& \mathcal J\ar[r]^-{\varphi}
& \tilde{\mathcal U}\times
\mathbb T \ar[d]^-{{\rm pr}_2}\\
\tilde{\mathcal U}
\ar[rrrr]^-{[C]\mapsto{\rm pr}_2(\varphi(\eta_C))}
&&&& \mathbb T
}
\]
where $\eta_C={g'}_3^1-g_3^1=K_C-2g_3^1$ and $\varphi$ is a $\mathcal C^\infty$-trivialization
(defined after possibly shrinking $\mathcal U$).
The commutativity of the top square comes from
the fact that on a hyperelliptic curve $C$ we have
$g_3^1 = p + g_2^1$ and $K_C - 2g_3^1 = j(p)-p$,
where $j\in{\rm Aut}(C)$ is the hyperelliptic involution.
By Theorem~\ref{diff} the differential
of the map $\gamma\colon\imath^*\mathcal C\to \mathbb T$
obtained composing the maps in the diagram
is surjective at any point $p$ which is not Weierstrass.
This implies that the map $\eta: \tilde{\mathcal U}\to \mathbb T$
is locally a submersion at any point corresponding to a hyperelliptic
curve, in particular its image contains an open subset of $\mathbb T$.
We thus conclude as in the last part of the
proof of Theorem~\ref{teo-2} given in section~\ref{density}.
\end{proof}
\section{Examples}
\label{exa}
In this section we will provide further examples
of curves having two $g_k^1$'s whose
difference is a torsion element in the Jacobian.
In particular we will show how to use automorphism
groups to construct new examples (see
Example~\ref{exa:new}).
\begin{proposition}\label{auto}
Let $C$ be a curve in $\mathcal F_k$.
If $G$ is an automorphism group of $C$
of order $n$ which preserves each
$g_k^1$ of $C$ and such that $C/G$
has genus zero, then the order of
$\eta_C$ divides $n$.
\end{proposition}
\begin{proof}
Let $\pi:C\to C/G\cong {\mathbb P}^1$ be
the quotient morphism, let
$D=p_1+p_2+\dots+p_k$ be an
element of the first $g_k^1$
and let $q_i=\pi(p_i)$. Then
the following linear equivalences
hold
\[
nD
\sim
\sum_{\sigma\in G} \sigma^*(D)
=
\pi^*(q_1)+\pi^*(q_2)+\dots+\pi^*(q_k)
\sim
kF,
\]
where $F$ is a fiber of $\pi$ and the first equivalence
is due to the fact that $G$ preserves the
linear series $g_k^1$.
Since the same property holds for an element
$D'$ of the second $g_k^1$, the linear equivalence
$nD\sim nD'$ follows.
\end{proof}
\begin{example}
Let $\sigma$ be the order $k$ automorphism
of ${\mathbb P}^1\times{\mathbb P}^1$ defined by
\[
\sigma(x_0,x_1,y_0,y_1)=(\zeta_k x_0,x_1, y_0,y_1),
\]
where $\zeta_k$ is a primitive $k$-th root of unity.
We now show that a curve $C\in\mathcal F_k$
which is $\sigma$-invariant
admits an equation of the form
\[
x_0^kg_2(y_0,y_1)+x_1^kf_2(y_0,y_1)=0,
\]
where $f_2, g_2$ are homogeneous of degree
$k$ in $y_0,y_1$. In particular the quotient
$C/\langle\sigma\rangle$
has genus zero. Thus $C\in\mathcal F_k^{\rm tor}$
by either Proposition~\ref{auto} or Proposition~\ref{torsion}.
The automorphism $\sigma$ preserves
each ruling of the quadric and acts identically
on one of the two rulings.
Consider a point in $\mathcal H_1\cap\mathcal H_2$,
with the notation in the proof of Proposition~\ref{torsion},
which corresponds to a $\sigma$-invariant grid.
The lines of the grid which belong to the first ruling
are defined by either
$x_0^k-x_1^k=0$ or $x_0^k=0$.
An equation of $C$ in such coordinates
is then of the form
\[
(x_0^k-\mu x_1^k)h_1+(x_0^k+\lambda x_1^k)h_2
=
x_0^k(h_1+h_2)+x_1^k(\lambda h_2-\mu h_1)
=
0,
\]
for $\mu\in \{0,1\}$, $\lambda\in {\mathbb C}$ and $h_1,h_2$
homogeneous of degree three in $y_0,y_1$.
\end{example}
\begin{example}
\label{exa:new}
The moduli space of non-hyperelliptic
curves $C$ of genus four having an order five
automorphism $\sigma$ such that
$C/\langle\sigma\rangle$
has genus zero is a 1-dimensional subvariety
of $\mathcal F_3^{\rm tor}$.
Moreover, any such $C$ is isomorphic to a
curve in the following family
\[
x_0x_1^2y_1^3
+\alpha x_0^2x_1y_0^3
+\beta x_0^3y_0y_1^2
+\gamma x_1^3y_0^2y_1=0,
\]
where $\sigma(x_0,x_1,y_0,y_1)
=(\zeta_5x_0,x_1,\zeta_5^3y_0,y_1)$
and $\zeta_5$ is a primitive fifth root of unity.
The family contains curves which pass through the points
of a grid of type $(5,5)$, for example the curve with
\[
\alpha=-\zeta_5,\ \beta=\zeta_5^3+\zeta_5^2+\zeta_5,\ \gamma=\zeta_5^2+\zeta_5.
\]
However, the general element of the family is not
of grilled type.
This means that if $D_i$ is a divisor of the $i$-th $g_3^1$
and $\mathcal H_i\subseteq |5D_1|\cong{\mathbb P}^{11}$
is the projectivization of the fifth symmetric
power of $H^0(C,D_i)$, then the intersection
$\mathcal H_1\cap\mathcal H_2$ is empty.
For example this holds for the curve with $\alpha=-1, \beta=\gamma=1$.
The statements for both curves can be checked
by means of the Magma~\cite{Magma} program
available here~\url{http://www2.udec.cl/~alaface/software/semiample/aut}.
\end{example}
\begin{bibdiv}
\begin{biblist}
\bib{AC}{article}{
author={Arbarello, Enrico},
author={Cornalba, Maurizio},
title={Footnotes to a paper of Beniamino Segre: ``On the modules of
polygonal curves and on a complement to the Riemann existence theorem''
(Italian) [Math. Ann. {\bf 100} (1928), 537--551;\ Jbuch {\bf 54}, 685]},
note={The number of $g^{1}_{d}$'s on a general $d$-gonal curve, and
the unirationality of the Hurwitz spaces of $4$-gonal and $5$-gonal
curves},
journal={Math. Ann.},
volume={256},
date={1981},
number={3},
pages={341--362},
issn={0025-5831},
review={\MR{626954 (83d:14016)}},
doi={10.1007/BF01679702},
}
\bib{ADHL}{book}{
AUTHOR = {Arzhantsev, Ivan},
AUTHOR = {Derenthal, Ulrich},
AUTHOR = {Hausen, J\"urgen},
AUTHOR = {Laface, Antonio},
TITLE = {Cox rings},
series={Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics},
volume={144},
publisher={Cambridge University Press, Cambridge},
date={2014},
pages={530},
isbn={9781107024625},
}
\bib{BHPV}{book}{
author={Barth, Wolf P.},
author={Hulek, Klaus},
author={Peters, Chris A. M.},
author={Van de Ven, Antonius},
title={Compact complex surfaces},
series={Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete. 3. Folge. A
Series of Modern Surveys in Mathematics [Results in Mathematics and
Related Areas. 3rd Series. A Series of Modern Surveys in Mathematics]},
volume={4},
edition={2},
publisher={Springer-Verlag, Berlin},
date={2004},
pages={xii+436},
isbn={3-540-00832-2},
review={\MR{2030225 (2004m:14070)}},
doi={10.1007/978-3-642-57739-0},
}
\bib{Magma}{article}{
AUTHOR = {Bosma, Wieb},
AUTHOR = {Cannon, John},
AUTHOR = {Playoust, Catherine},
TITLE = {The {M}agma algebra system. {I}. {T}he user language},
NOTE = {Computational algebra and number theory (London, 1993)},
JOURNAL = {J. Symbolic Comput.},
VOLUME = {24},
YEAR = {1997},
NUMBER = {3-4},
PAGES = {235--265}
}
\bib{CK}{article}{
author={Ciliberto, Ciro},
author={Kouvidakis, Alexis},
title={On the symmetric product of a curve with general moduli},
journal={Geom. Dedicata},
volume={78},
date={1999},
number={3},
pages={327--343},
issn={0046-5755},
review={\MR{1725369 (2001e:14005)}},
doi={10.1023/A:1005280023724},
}
\bib{CP}{article}{
author={Collino, Alberto},
author={Pirola, Gian Pietro},
title={The Griffiths infinitesimal invariant for a curve in its Jacobian},
journal={Duke Math. J.},
volume={78},
date={1995},
number={1},
pages={59--88},
issn={0012-7094},
review={\MR{1328752 (96f:14009)}},
doi={10.1215/S0012-7094-95-07804-1},
}
\bib{CPP}{article}{
author={Colombo, E.},
author={Pirola, G. P.},
author={Previato, E.},
title={Density of elliptic solitons},
journal={J. Reine Angew. Math.},
volume={451},
date={1994},
pages={161--169},
issn={0075-4102},
review={\MR{1277298 (95e:58079)}},
}
\bib{CS}{article}{
author={Cox, David},
author={Sidman, Jessica},
title={Secant varieties of toric varieties},
journal={J. Pure Appl. Algebra},
volume={209},
date={2007},
number={3},
pages={651--669},
issn={0022-4049},
review={\MR{2298847 (2008i:14077)}},
doi={10.1016/j.jpaa.2006.07.008},
}
\bib{Gr}{article}{
author={Griffiths, Phillip A.},
title={Infinitesimal variations of Hodge structure. III. Determinantal
varieties and the infinitesimal invariant of normal functions},
journal={Compositio Math.},
volume={50},
date={1983},
number={2-3},
pages={267--324},
issn={0010-437X},
review={\MR{720290 (86e:32026c)}},
}
\bib{GH}{book}{
author={Griffiths, Phillip},
author={Harris, Joseph},
title={Principles of algebraic geometry},
series={Wiley Classics Library},
note={Reprint of the 1978 original},
publisher={John Wiley \& Sons, Inc., New York},
date={1994},
pages={xiv+813},
isbn={0-471-05059-8},
review={\MR{1288523 (95d:14001)}},
doi={10.1002/9781118032527},
}
\bib{Ke}{article}{
author={Keel, Se{\'a}n},
title={Basepoint freeness for nef and big line bundles in positive
characteristic},
journal={Ann. of Math. (2)},
volume={149},
date={1999},
number={1},
pages={253--286},
issn={0003-486X},
review={\MR{1680559 (2000j:14011)}},
doi={10.2307/121025},
}
\bib{K}{article}{
AUTHOR = {Kond{\=o}, Shigeyuki},
TITLE = {The moduli space of curves of genus 4 and {D}eligne-{M}ostow's
complex reflection groups},
BOOKTITLE = {Algebraic geometry 2000, {A}zumino ({H}otaka)},
SERIES = {Adv. Stud. Pure Math.},
VOLUME = {36},
PAGES = {383--400},
PUBLISHER = {Math. Soc. Japan},
ADDRESS = {Tokyo},
YEAR = {2002},
MRCLASS = {14H15 (14D07 14H45 14J28 32S40 33C80)},
MRNUMBER = {1971521 (2004h:14033)},
MRREVIEWER = {I. Dolgachev},
}
\bib{La}{book}{
author={Lazarsfeld, Robert},
title={Positivity in algebraic geometry. I},
series={Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete. 3. Folge. A
Series of Modern Surveys in Mathematics [Results in Mathematics and
Related Areas. 3rd Series. A Series of Modern Surveys in Mathematics]},
volume={48},
note={Classical setting: line bundles and linear series},
publisher={Springer-Verlag, Berlin},
date={2004},
pages={xviii+387},
isbn={3-540-22533-1},
review={\MR{2095471 (2005k:14001a)}},
doi={10.1007/978-3-642-18808-4},
}
\bib{R}{article}{
author={Raviolo, Emanuele},
title={A note on Griffiths infinitesimal invariant for curves},
journal={Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. (4)},
volume={193},
date={2014},
number={2},
pages={551--559},
issn={0373-3114},
review={\MR{3180933}},
doi={10.1007/s10231-012-0290-x},
}
\end{biblist}
\end{bibdiv}
\end{document} |
\section{Introduction} Precision flavour physics is a particularly powerful tool for exploring the limits of the Standard Model (SM) of particle physics and in searching for inconsistencies which would signal the existence of new physics. An important component of this endeavour is the over-determination of the elements of the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa (CKM) matrix from a wide range of weak processes. The precision in extracting CKM matrix elements is generally limited by our ability to quantify hadronic effects and the main goal of large-scale simulations using the lattice formulation of QCD is the \emph{ab-initio} evaluation of the non-perturbative QCD effects in physical processes.
The recent, very impressive, improvement in lattice computations has led to a precision approaching $O(1\%)$ for a number of quantities (see e.g. Ref.\,\cite{Aoki:2013ldr} and references therein) and therefore in order to make further progress electromagnetic effects (and other isospin-breaking contributions) have to be considered. The question of how to include electromagnetic effects in the hadron spectrum and in the determination of quark masses in ab-initio
lattice calculations was addressed for the first time in~\cite{Duncan:1996xy}.
Much theoretical and algorithmic progress has been made following this pioneering work, particularly in recent years, leading to remarkably accurate determinations of the charged-neutral mass splittings of light pseudoscalar mesons and light baryons (see Refs.~\cite{Borsanyi:2014jba,Basak:2014vca,deDivitiis:2013xla,Ishikawa:2012ix,Aoki:2012st,Blum:2010ym} for recent papers on the subject and Refs.~\cite{Tantalo:2013maa,Portellilattice} for reviews of these results and a discussion of the different approaches used to perform QED+QCD lattice calculations of the spectrum).
In the computation of the hadron spectrum there is a very significant simplification in that there are no infrared divergences. In this paper we propose a strategy to include
electromagnetic effects in processes for which infrared divergences are present but which cancel in the standard way between diagrams containing different numbers of real and virtual photons~\cite{Bloch:1937pw}. The presence of infrared divergences in intermediate steps of the calculation requires the development of new methods.
Indeed, in order to cancel the infrared divergences and obtain results for physical quantities,
radiative corrections from virtual and real photons must be combined.
We stress that it is not sufficient simply to add the electromagnetic interaction to the quark action because amplitudes with different numbers of real
photons must be evaluated separately, before being combined in the inclusive rate for a given process.
In this paper for the first time we introduce and discuss a strategy to compute electromagnetic radiative corrections to leptonic decays of pseudoscalar mesons which can then be used to determine the corresponding CKM matrix elements. Although we present the explicit discussion for this specific set of processes, the method is more general and can readily be extended to generic processes including, for example, to semileptonic decays.
We now focus on the leptonic decay of the charged pseudoscalar meson $P^+$. Let $\Gamma_0$ be the partial width for the decay $P^+\to\ell^+\nu_\ell$ where the charged lepton $\ell$ is an electron or a muon (or possibly a $\tau$) and $\nu_\ell$ is the corresponding neutrino.
The subscript $0$ indicates that there are no photons in the final state.
In the absence of electromagnetism, the non-perturbative QCD effects are contained in a single number, the decay constant $f_P$, defined by
\begin{equation}\label{eq:fPdef}
\langle 0\,|\,\bar{q}_1\gamma^\mu\gamma^5\,q_2\,|\,P^+(p)\rangle=ip^\mu f_P\,,
\end{equation}
where $P^+$ is composed of the valence quarks $\bar q_1$ and ${q}_2$, and the axial current in (\ref{eq:fPdef}) is composed of the corresponding quark fields. There have been very many lattice calculations of the decay constants $f_\pi$,\,$f_K$,\,$f_{D_{(s)}}$ and $f_{B_{(s)}}$~\cite{Aoki:2013ldr}, some of which are approaching $O(1\%)$ precision.
As noted above, in order to determine the corresponding CKM matrix elements at this level of precision isospin breaking effects, including electromagnetic corrections, must be considered. It will become clear in the following, and has been stressed in \cite{Bijnens:1993ae,Gasser:2010wz}, that it is not possible to give a physical definition of the decay constant $f_P$ in the presence of electromagnetism, because of the contributions from diagrams in which the photon is emitted by the hadron and absorbed by the charged lepton. Thus the physical width is not just given in terms of the matrix element of the axial current and can only be obtained by a full calculation of the electromagnetic corrections at a given order.
The calculation of electromagnetic effects leads to an immediate difficulty: $\Gamma_0$ contains infrared divergences and by itself is therefore unphysical. The well-known solution to this problem is to include the contributions from real photons. We therefore define $\Gamma_1(\Delta E)$ to be the partial width for the decay $P^+\to\ell^+\nu_\ell\,\gamma$ where the energy of the photon in the rest frame of $P^+$ is integrated from $0$ to $\Delta E$. The sum $\Gamma_0+\Gamma_1(\Delta E)$ is free from infrared divergences (although, of course, it does depend on the energy cut-off $\Delta E$). We restrict the discussion to $O(\alpha)$ corrections, where $\alpha$ is the electromagnetic fine-structure constant, and hence only consider a single photon.
The previous paragraph reminds us that the determination of the CKM matrix elements $V_{q_1q_2}$ at $O(\alpha)$ (i.e.~at $O(1\%)$ or better) from leptonic decays requires the evaluation of amplitudes with a real photon. The main goal of this paper is to suggest how such a calculation might be performed with non-perturbative accuracy. There are a number of technicalities which will be explained in the following sections, but here we present a general outline of the proposed method. We start with the experimental observable $\Gamma(\Delta E)$, the partial width for $P^+\to\ell^+\nu_\ell(\gamma)$. The final state consists either of $\ell^+\nu_\ell$ or of $\ell^+\nu_\ell\gamma$ where the energy of the photon in the centre-of-mass frame is smaller than $\Delta E$:
\begin{equation}\label{eq:Gamma01}
\Gamma(\Delta E)=\Gamma_0+\Gamma_1(\Delta E)\,.
\end{equation}
In principle at least, $\Gamma_1(\Delta E)$ can be evaluated in lattice simulations by computing the amplitudes for a range of photon momenta and using the results to perform the integral over phase space. Such calculations would be very challenging. Since the computations are necessarily performed in finite volumes the available momenta are discrete, so that it would be necessary to choose the volumes appropriately and compute several correlation functions.
We choose instead to make use of the fact that a very soft photon couples to a charged hadron as if to an elementary particle; it does not resolve the structure of the hadron. We therefore propose to choose $\Delta E$ to be sufficiently small that the pointlike approximation can be used to calculate $\Gamma_1(\Delta E)$ in perturbation theory, treating $P^+$ as an elementary particle. On the other hand, $\Delta E$ must be sufficiently large that $\Gamma(\Delta E)$ can be measured experimentally. We imagine setting $\Delta E=O(10\,\textrm{-}\,20\,\mathrm{MeV})$ which satisfies both requirements. From Refs.\,\cite{Ambrosino:2005fw,Ambrosino:2009aa} we learn that resolutions on the energy of the photon in the rest frame of the decaying particle of this order are experimentally accessible.
In Appendix~\ref{sec:sd} we present a discussion, based on phenomenological analyses, of the uncertainties induced by treating the meson as elementary as a function of $\Delta E$.
It is necessary to ensure that the cancellation of infrared divergences occurs with good numerical precision leading to an accurate result for $\Gamma(\Delta E)$. Since $\Gamma_0$ is to be calculated in a Monte-Carlo simulation and $\Gamma_1(\Delta E)$ in perturbation theory using the pointlike approximation, this requires an intermediate step. We propose to rewrite Eq.\,(\ref{eq:Gamma01}) in the form
\begin{equation}\label{eq:master}
\Gamma(\Delta E)=\lim_{V\to\infty}(\Gamma_0-\Gamma_0^{\mathrm{pt}})+
\lim_{V\to\infty}(\Gamma_0^{\mathrm{pt}}+\Gamma_1(\Delta E))\,,
\end{equation}
where $V$ is the volume of the lattice.
$\Gamma_0^\mathrm{pt}$ is an unphysical quantity; it is the perturbatively calculated amplitude at $O(\alpha)$ for the decay $P^+\to\ell^+\nu_\ell$ with the $P^+$ treated as an elementary particle. In $\Gamma_0^\mathrm{pt}$ the finite-volume sum over the momenta of the photon is performed over the full range. The contributions from small momenta to $\Gamma_0$ and $\Gamma_0^\mathrm{pt}$ are the same and thus the infrared divergences cancel in the first term on the right-hand side of Eq.\,(\ref{eq:master}).
Moreover, the infrared divergences in $\Gamma_0$ and $\Gamma_0^\mathrm{pt}$ are both equal and opposite to that in $\Gamma_1(\Delta E)$. The infrared divergences therefore cancel separately in each of the two terms on the right-hand side of Eq.\,(\ref{eq:master}) and indeed we treat each of these terms separately. $\Gamma_0^{\mathrm{pt}}+\Gamma_1(\Delta E)$ is calculated in perturbation theory directly in infinite volume. The QCD effects in $\Gamma_0$ are calculated stochastically in a lattice simulation and the virtual photon is included explicitly in the Feynman gauge. For each photon momentum this is combined with $\Gamma_0^\mathrm{pt}$ and the difference is summed over the momenta and then the infinite-volume limit is taken. This completes the sketch of the proposed method, and in the remainder of this paper we explain the many technical issues which must be addressed.
It will be helpful in the following to define $\Delta\Gamma_0(L)$ in terms of the first term on the right-hand side of Eq.\,(\ref{eq:master}):
\begin{equation}\label{eq:DeltaGamma0def}
\Delta\Gamma_0(L)=\Gamma_0(L)-\Gamma_0^\mathrm{pt}(L)\,,
\end{equation}
where we have made the dependence on the volume explicit, $V=L^3$ and $L$ is the length of the lattice in any spacial direction (for simplicity we assume that this length is the same in all three directions). In analogy to Eq.\,(\ref{eq:Gamma01}) we also define the perturbative quantity
\begin{equation}\label{eq:Gamm01pt}
\Gamma^\mathrm{pt}(\Delta E)\equiv\Gamma^\mathrm{pt}_0+\Gamma_1(\Delta E)\,.
\end{equation}
We note that, since the sum of all the terms in Eq.\,(\ref{eq:master}) is gauge invariant as is the perturbative rate $\Gamma^\mathrm{pt}(\Delta E)$, the combination $\Delta\Gamma_0(L)$ is also gauge invariant, although each of the two terms is not.
The plan of this paper is as follows. In the next section we discuss the effective weak Hamiltonian and its renormalisation in the presence of electromagnetism. The structure of the calculation and the correlation functions which need to be calculated are presented in Sec.\,\ref{sec:structure}.
The evaluation of the second term on the right-hand side of Eq.\,(\ref{eq:master}), $\Gamma^\mathrm{pt}(\Delta E)$, directly in infinite volume, is theoretically straightforward and we perform this calculation in~Sec.\,\ref{sec:Gamma1}. Sec.\,\ref{sec:ir} contains a detailed discussion of the regularisation and cancellation of infrared divergences in a finite volume. We put all the elements of the calculation together in Sec.\,\ref{sec:concs}, where we present a summary and the prospects for the implementation of the method in numerical simulations.
There are two appendices. In Appendix\,\ref{sec:Wilsonmatching} we discuss the matching of the bare lattice operators used in the calculation of correlation functions and those defined in the $W$-regularisation which is a natural scheme used in the definition of the Fermi constant $G_F$ in the presence of electromagnetism. Finally in Appendix~\ref{sec:sd} we present some phenomenological estimates of the uncertainties due to the use of the point-like approximation for $P^+$ in the decay $P^+\to\ell^+\nu\gamma$.
In the remainder of the paper, to be specific we choose $P^+ =\pi^+$ but the discussion generalizes trivially to other pseudoscalar mesons with the obvious changes of flavour labels. The method does not require $P^+$ to be a light psuedo-Goldstone Boson nor on the use of chiral perturbation theory.
\section{Matching the effective local four-quark operator(s) onto the standard model}\label{sec:uv}
\begin{figure}[t]
\includegraphics[width=0.7\hsize]{figs/DiagLO.eps}
\caption{Tree-level diagram for the process $u\bar{d}\to\ell^+\nu_\ell$ (left-hand diagram). In the effective theory the interaction is replaced by a local four-fermion operator (right-hand diagram).
\label{fig:DiagLO}}
\end{figure}
At lowest order in electromagnetic (and strong) perturbation theory the process $u\bar{d}\to\ell^+\nu_\ell$ proceeds by an $s$-channel $W$ exchange, see the left-hand diagram in Fig.\,\ref{fig:DiagLO}. Since the energy-momentum exchanges in this process are much smaller than $M_W$, it is standard practice to rewrite the amplitude in terms of a four-fermion local interaction:
\begin{equation}\label{eq:DeltaL0}
{\cal L}_W=-\frac{4G_F}{\sqrt{2}}\,V_{ud}^\ast\,\big(\bar{d}_L\gamma_\mu u_L\big)\,\big(\bar{\nu}_{\ell\,L}\gamma^\mu \ell_L\big)\,,
\end{equation}
where the subscript {\footnotesize $L$} represents \emph{left}, $\psi_L = \frac{(1-\gamma_5)}{2}\, \psi$, and $G_F$ is the Fermi constant. In performing lattice computations this replacement is necessary, since the lattice spacing $a$ is much greater than $1/M_W$, where $M_W$ is the mass of the $W$-Boson. When including the $O(\alpha)$ corrections, the ultra-violet contributions to the matrix element of the local operator are different to those in the Standard Model and in this section we discuss the matching factors which must be computed to determine the $O(\alpha)$ corrections to the $\pi^+\to\ell^+\nu_\ell$ decay from lattice computations of correlation functions containing the local operator in (\ref{eq:DeltaL0}). Since the pion decay width is written in terms of $G_F$, it is necessary to start by revisiting the determination of the Fermi constant at $O(\alpha)$.
\subsection{Determination of the Fermi constant, $\mathbf{G_F}$}
$G_F$ is conventionally taken from the measured value of the muon lifetime using the expression~\cite{Berman:1958ti,Kinoshita:1958ru}
\begin{equation}\label{eq:muonlifetime}
\frac{1}{\tau_\mu}=\frac{G_F^2m_\mu^5}{192\pi^3}\left[1-\frac{8m_e^2}{m_\mu^2}\right]\left[1+\frac{\alpha}{2\pi}\left(\frac{25}{4}-\pi^2\right)\right],\end{equation}
leading to the value $G_F=1.16634\times 10^{-5}\,\mathrm{GeV}^{-2}$. (For an extension of Eq.\,(\ref{eq:muonlifetime}) to $O(\alpha^2)$ and the inclusion of higher powers of $\rho\equiv(m_e/m_\mu)^2$ see Sec.\,10.2 of~\cite{Beringer:1900zz}. The Particle Data Group~\cite{Beringer:1900zz} quote the corresponding value of the Fermi constant to be $G_F=1.1663787(6)\times 10^{-5}\,\mathrm{GeV}^{-2}$.)
Eq.\,(\ref{eq:muonlifetime}) can be viewed as the definition of $G_F$. When calculating the Standard Model corrections to the muon lifetime many of the contributions are absorbed into $G_F$ and the remaining terms on the right-hand side of (\ref{eq:muonlifetime}) come from the diagrams in Fig.\,\ref{fig:muondecay}. Specifically in these diagrams the factor $1/k^2$ in the Feynman-gauge photon propagator is replaced by $1/k^2\times M_W^2/(M_W^2-k^2)$, where $k$ is the momentum in the propagator; this is called the $W$-regularisation of ultra-violet divergences. These diagrams are evaluated in the effective theory with the local four-fermion operator $(\bar\nu_\mu\gamma^\mu(1-\gamma^5)\mu)\,(\bar e\gamma^\mu(1-\gamma^5)\nu_e)$; the two currents are represented by the filled black circles in Fig.\,\ref{fig:muondecay}.
\begin{figure}[t]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=0.25\hsize]{figs/mudecay1.eps}\qquad
\includegraphics[width=0.25\hsize]{figs/mudecay2.eps}\qquad
\includegraphics[width=0.25\hsize]{figs/mudecay3.eps}
\end{center}
\caption{Diagrams contributing to the $O(\alpha)$ corrections to muon decay; see Eq.\,(\ref{eq:muonlifetime}). The curly line represents the photon.\label{fig:muondecay}}
\end{figure}
An explanation of the reasoning behind the introduction of the W-regularisation is given in~\cite{Sirlin:1980nh}. The Feynman-gauge photon propagator is rewritten as two terms:
\begin{equation}\label{eq:split}
\frac{1}{k^2}=\frac{1}{k^2-M_W^2}+\frac{M_W^2}{M_W^2-k^2}\,\frac1{k^2}
\end{equation}
and the ultra-violet divergent contributions come from the first term and are absorbed in the definition of $G_F$. In addition, the Standard-Model $\gamma$-$W$ box diagram in Fig.\,\ref{fig:gammaWbox} is ultra-violet convergent and is equal to the corresponding diagram in the effective theory (i.e. the third diagram in Fig.\,\ref{fig:muondecay}) with the W-regularisation, up to negligible corrections of $O(q^2/M_W^2)$, where $q$ is the four-momentum of the electron and its neutrino. Other electroweak corrections not explicitly mentioned above are all absorbed into $G_F$.
\subsection{$W$-regularisation and Weak Decays of Hadrons}
\begin{figure}[t]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=0.4\hsize]{figs/mudecay4.eps}\qquad
\end{center}
\caption{Photon-$W$ box diagrams contributing to the $O(\alpha)$ corrections to muon decay in the Standard Model. The curly line represents the photon.\label{fig:gammaWbox}}
\end{figure}
It is a particularly helpful feature that most of the terms which are absorbed into the definition of $G_F$ are common to other processes, including the leptonic decays of pseudoscalar mesons~\cite{Sirlin:1981ie,Braaten:1990ef}.
There are however, some short-distance contributions which do depend on the electric charges of the individual fields in the four-fermion operators and these lead to a correction factor of $(1+\frac{2\alpha}{\pi}\log\frac{M_Z}{M_W})$ to $\Gamma_0$~\cite{Sirlin:1981ie}. This is a tiny correction ($\simeq 0.06\%$), but one which nevertheless can readily be included explicitly.
The conclusion of the above discussion is that the evaluation of the amplitude for the process $\pi^+\to\ell^+\nu$ up to $O(\alpha)$ can be performed in the effective theory with the effective Hamiltonian
\begin{equation}\label{eq:Heff}
H_\mathrm{eff}=\frac{G_F}{\sqrt{2}}\,V_{ud}^\ast\left(1+\frac{\alpha}{\pi}\log\frac{M_Z}{M_W}\right)(\bar{d}\gamma^\mu (1-\gamma^5)u)\,
(\bar{\nu}_\ell\gamma_\mu(1-\gamma^5)\ell)\,,
\end{equation}
and with the Feynman-gauge photon propagator in the W-regularisation. The value of $G_F$ is obtained from the muon lifetime as discussed around Eq.\,(\ref{eq:muonlifetime}).
Of course we are not able to implement the W-regularisation directly in present day lattice simulations in which the inverse lattice spacing is much smaller than $M_W$. The relation between the operator in eq.\,(\ref{eq:Heff}) in the lattice and W regularisations can be computed in perturbation theory. Thus for example, with the Wilson action for both the gluons and fermions:
\begin{eqnarray}
O_1^\mathrm{W-reg}&=&\left(1+\frac{\alpha}{4\pi}\left(2\log a^2M_W^2-15.539\right)\right)O_1^\mathrm{bare} + \frac{\alpha}{4\pi}\ \left(
0.536\,O_2^\mathrm{bare} \right. \nonumber\\
&& \left. \hspace{0.3in}+1.607\,O_3^\mathrm{bare}-3.214\,O_4^\mathrm{bare}-0.804\,O_5^\mathrm{bare} \right) \,,\label{eq:matchingWilson}
\end{eqnarray}
where
\begin{align}
O_1&= (\bar{d}\gamma^\mu (1-\gamma^5)u)\,(\bar{\nu}_\ell\gamma_\mu(1-\gamma^5)\ell)&O_2&=
(\bar{d}\gamma^\mu (1+\gamma^5)u)\,(\bar{\nu}_\ell\gamma_\mu(1-\gamma^5)\ell)
\nonumber\\
O_3&= (\bar{d}(1-\gamma^5)u)\,(\bar{\nu}_\ell(1+\gamma^5)\ell)&O_4&= (\bar{d}(1+\gamma^5)u)\,(\bar{\nu}_\ell(1+\gamma^5)\ell)\label{eq:5ops}\\
O_5&=(\bar{d}\sigma^{\mu\nu}(1+\gamma^5) u)\,(\bar{\nu}_\ell\sigma_{\mu\nu}(1+\gamma^5)\ell)\,.\nonumber
\end{align}
The superscript ``bare" indicates that these are bare operators in the lattice theory and the presence of 5 operators on the right-hand side of Eq.\,(\ref{eq:matchingWilson}) is a consequence of the breaking of chiral symmetry in the Wilson theory. Using lattice actions with good chiral symmetry, such as domain wall fermions with a sufficiently large fifth dimension, only $O_1^\mathrm{bare}$ would appear on the right-hand side of Eq.(\ref{eq:matchingWilson}). The coefficients multiplying the operators depend of course on the lattice action being used.
More details of the derivation of Eq.\,(\ref{eq:matchingWilson}) are presented in Appendix\,\ref{sec:Wilsonmatching}.
Eq.\,(\ref{eq:matchingWilson}) is valid up to corrections of $O(\alpha_s(a)\,\alpha)$\,.
Having formulated the problem of calculating $\Gamma_0$ in terms of the evaluation of correlation functions involving the effective Hamiltonian in Eq.\,(\ref{eq:Heff}) we are now in a position to discuss the calculation of $\Delta\Gamma_0(L)$, the first term on the right-hand side of the master formula Eq.\,(\ref{eq:master}).
\section{Structure of the calculation}\label{sec:structure}
\begin{figure}[t]
\includegraphics[width=0.4\hsize]{figs/Diag0.eps}\qquad\qquad
\caption{Correlation function used to calculate the amplitude for the leptonic decay of the pion in pure QCD. The two black filled circles represent the local current-current operator $(\bar{d}\gamma^\mu_Lu)\,(\bar{\nu}_\ell\gamma_\mu\ell)$; the circles are displaced for convenience.\label{fig:LO}}
\end{figure}
In this section we begin our explanation of how the calculations of the amplitudes for the processes $\pi^+\to\ell^+\nu$ and $\pi^+\to\ell^+\nu\gamma$ are to be performed. Before entering into the details however, we discuss more extensively the structure of the different terms appearing in Eq.\,(\ref{eq:master}).
Since we add and subtract the same perturbative quantity $\Gamma_0^{\mathrm{pt}}$, we find it convenient to choose this to be the virtual decay rate for a point-like pion computed in the W-regularisation. In this way we obtain the important advantage that the difference of the first two terms ($\Delta\Gamma_0(L)$) and the sum of the last two terms ($\Gamma^\mathrm{pt}(\Delta E)$) on the r.h.s. of Eq.~(\ref{eq:master}) are separately ultraviolet and infrared finite.
Let $\sqrt{Z_\ell}$ be the contribution to the decay amplitude from the electromagnetic wave-function renormalisation of the final state lepton (see the diagram in Fig.\,\ref{fig:virtualNLO}(d)). An important simplifying feature of this calculation is that $Z_\ell$ cancels in the difference $\Gamma_0-\Gamma_0^\mathrm{pt}$. This is because
in any scheme and using the same value of the decay constant $f_\pi$, the contribution from the diagram in Fig.\,\ref{fig:virtualNLO}(d) computed non-perturbatively or perturbatively with the point-like approximation are the same. Thus we only need to calculate $Z_\ell$ directly in infinite volume and include it in the second term on the right-hand side of Eq.\,(\ref{eq:master}). As a result of this cancellation it is convenient to rewrite $\Gamma_0$ and $\Gamma_0^\mathrm{pt}$ in the form:
\begin{equation}
\Gamma_0 = \Gamma_0^{\mathrm{tree}}+ \Gamma_0^{\alpha}+ \Gamma_0^{\mathrm{(d)}}\quad\mathrm{and}\quad
\Gamma_0^{\mathrm{pt}} = \Gamma_0^{\mathrm{tree}}+ \Gamma_0^{\alpha,\mathrm{pt}}+ \Gamma_0^{\mathrm{(d),pt}}\,,
\end{equation}
where the superscript {\footnotesize tree} indicates the width in the absence of electromagnetic effects, {\footnotesize $(d)$} denotes the contribution from the leptonic wave function renormalisation and the index {\footnotesize$\alpha$} represents the remaining contributions of $O(\alpha)$ other than those proportional to $Z_\ell$. In this notation the above discussion can be summarised by saying that $\Gamma_0^{\mathrm{(d)}}=\Gamma_0^{\mathrm{(d),pt}}$ and that the calculation of $\Delta\Gamma_0(L)$ at $O(\alpha)$ reduces to that of computing $\Gamma_0^{\alpha}-\Gamma_0^{\alpha,\mathrm{pt}}$.
Having eliminated the need to include the effects of the lepton's wave-function renormalisation from the evaluation of $\Delta\Gamma_0(L)$,
we need to make the corresponding modification in the factor(s) relating the lattice and $W$ regularisations. This simply amounts to subtracting the
term corresponding to the matching between the lattice to $W$ regularisations of the lepton wave function renormalisation diagram.
With the Wilson action (for both gluons and fermions) for example, the $O(\alpha)$ contribution to this matching factor is
\begin{equation}\label{eq:zlmatching}
\Delta Z_\ell^\mathrm{W-reg} = \frac{\alpha}{4\pi}\left( -\frac{3}{2} - \log a^2M_W^2 - 11.852 \right)\,. \end{equation}
Thus, with the Wilson action, we can avoid calculating the effects of the lepton's wave-function renormalisation in $\Delta\Gamma_0(L)$ by neglecting the diagram in Fig.\,\ref{fig:virtualNLO}(d) and the corresponding diagram with the point-like pion, and simply replacing $O_1^\mathrm{W-reg}$ in Eq.(\ref{eq:matchingWilson}) by
\begin{eqnarray}
\tilde O_1^\mathrm{W-reg}&=&\left(1+\frac{\alpha}{4\pi}\left( \frac52 \, \log a^2M_W^2-8.863 \right)\right)O_1^\mathrm{bare}
+ \frac{\alpha}{4\pi} \, \left( 0.536\,O_2^\mathrm{bare} \right. \nonumber\\
&& \left. \hspace{0.3in}+1.607\,O_3^\mathrm{bare}-3.214\,O_4^\mathrm{bare}-0.804\,O_5^\mathrm{bare} \right) \,.\label{eq:matchingWilsontilde}
\end{eqnarray}
Such matching factors depend, of course, on the lattice discretisation of QCD and we simply present the results for the Wilson action for illustration.
Of course $\Gamma_0^{\mathrm{(d),pt}}$ needs to be computed for the second term on the right-hand side of Eq.\,(\ref{eq:master}). This is a straightforward perturbative calculation in infinite-volume and gives
\begin{equation}\label{eq:leptonwfpt}
\Gamma_0^{\mathrm{(d),pt}} = \Gamma_0^{\mathrm{tree}} ~ \frac{\alpha}{4 \pi}\left\{\log\left(\frac{m_\ell^2}{M_W^2}\right) - 2 \, \log \left( \frac{m_\gamma^2}{m_\ell^2}\right)- \frac{9}{2}
\right\}\,,
\end{equation}
where we use the $W$-regularisation for the ultra-violet divergences and have introduced a mass $m_\gamma$ for the photon in order to regulate the infrared divergences. The explicit expression for $\Gamma_0^\mathrm{tree}$ is given in Eq.~(\ref{eq:loG}) below. Using the
$W$-regularisation we naturally work in the Feynman gauge, but note that with $m_\gamma$ as the infrared regulator the result for $Z_\ell$ is generally gauge-dependent. For example, using dimensional regularisation for the ultraviolet divergences and $m_\gamma$ as the infrared regulator leads to a gauge dependent result for this single diagram (gauge invariance is restored of course for $\Gamma^\mathrm{pt}(\Delta E)$).
In summary therefore, we need to compute the two quantities
\begin{equation} \label{eq:twoquantities}
\Delta \Gamma_0(L) = \tilde \Gamma_0^{\alpha} - \Gamma_0^{\alpha,\mathrm{pt}} \qquad\mathrm{and}\qquad \Gamma^\mathrm{pt}(\Delta E) = \Gamma_0^{\mathrm{tree}}+ \Gamma_0^{\alpha,\mathrm{pt}}+ \Gamma_0^{\mathrm{(d),pt}}+ \Gamma_1(\Delta E) \, ,\end{equation}
where $\tilde \Gamma_0^{\alpha}$ corresponds to $ \Gamma_0^{\alpha}$ using $\tilde O_1^\mathrm{W-reg}$ instead of $ O_1^\mathrm{W-reg}$.
Note that $ \Delta \Gamma_0(L)$ and $\Gamma^\mathrm{pt}(\Delta E)$ are separately infrared finite and the result of the calculation of these two quantities does not depend on the infrared cutoff. In particular, this means that the infrared cutoff can be chosen in two different ways for the two quantities. We have decided to give a mass to the photon in the perturbative calculation of $\Gamma^\mathrm{pt}(\Delta E) $, whereas for $ \Delta \Gamma_0(L)$ a possible convenient choice is to use the finite volume as the infrared regulator. This will be explained in more detail in Sec.\,\ref{sec:ir}.
In the following two sections we discuss the calculation of $\Delta \Gamma_0(L)$ and $\Gamma^\mathrm{pt}(\Delta E)$ respectively.
\section{Calculation of $\Delta\Gamma_0(L)$}\label{sec:DGamma0}
In this section we describe the calculation of the first term on the right-hand side of Eq.\,(\ref{eq:master}), $\Delta\Gamma_0(L)$, at $O(\alpha)$. We start however, by briefly recalling the calculation of $\Gamma_0$ at $O(\alpha^0)$, i.e. without electromagnetism.
\subsection{Calculation of $\Gamma_0$ at $O(\alpha^0)$}\label{subsec:pureQCD}
Without electromagnetic corrections we need to compute the correlation function sketched in Fig.\,\ref{fig:LO}, which is a completely standard calculation. Since the leptonic terms are factorized from the hadronic ones, the amplitude is simply given by
\begin{eqnarray}
\bar{u}_{\nu_\ell\,\alpha}(p_{\nu_\ell})\,(M_0)_{\alpha\beta}\,v_{\ell\,\beta}(p_\ell)&=&\frac{G_F}{\sqrt{2}}V_{ud}^\ast~\langle\,0\,|\,\bar{d}\gamma^\nu\gamma^5\,u\,|\pi^+(p_\pi)\rangle~\big[\bar{u}_{\nu_\ell}(p_{\nu_\ell})\gamma_\nu(1-\gamma^5)\,v_\ell(p_\ell)\big]\nonumber\\
&=&\frac{iG_Ff_\pi}{\sqrt{2}}V_{ud}^\ast\,p_\pi^\nu~\big[\bar{u}_{\nu_\ell}(p_{\nu_\ell})\gamma_\nu(1-\gamma^5)\,v_\ell(p_\ell)\big]\label{eq:A0}\,.
\end{eqnarray}
Here $u,d$ in the matrix element represent the quark fields with the corresponding flavour quantum numbers and $u_{\nu_\ell}$ and $v_\ell$ the spinors of the leptons defined by the subscript. The hadronic matrix element, and hence the decay constant $f_\pi$, are obtained in the standard way by computing the correlation function
\begin{equation}
C_0(t)\equiv\sum_{\vec{x}}~\langle 0\,\,|\Big(\bar{d}(\vec{0},0)\gamma^4 \gamma^5\,u(\vec{0},0)\Big)\,\phi^\dagger(\vec{x},-t)\,|0\rangle\simeq\frac{Z^\phi_0}{2m_\pi^0}e^{-m_\pi^0 t}\,{\cal A}_0\,,\label{eq:C0}
\end{equation}
where $\phi^\dagger$ is an interpolating operator which can create the pion out of the vacuum, $Z^\phi_0\equiv\langle \pi^+(\vec{0}\hspace{1pt})|\phi^\dagger(0,\vec{0}\hspace{1pt})\,|\,0\rangle$ and ${\cal A}_0 \equiv
\langle\,0\,|\,\bar{d}\gamma^4\gamma^5\,u\,|\pi^+(\vec{0}\,)\rangle_0$. We have chosen to place the weak current at the origin and to create the pion at negative time $-t$, where $t$ and $T-t$ are sufficiently large to suppress the contributions from heavier states and from the backward propagating pions (this latter condition may be convenient but is not necessary). The subscript or superscript $0$ here denotes the fact that the calculation is performed at $O(\alpha^0)$, i.e. in the absence of electromagnetism. $Z^\phi_0$ is obtained from the two-point correlation function of two $\phi$ operators:
\begin{equation}
C_0^{\phi\phi}(t)\equiv\sum_{\vec{x}}~\langle\,0\,|T\{\phi(\vec{0},0)\,\phi^\dagger(\vec{x},-t)\}\,|\,0\,\rangle
\simeq\frac{(Z_0^{\phi})^2}{2m_\pi^0}\,e^{-m_\pi^0 t}\,.
\end{equation}
For convenience we take $\phi$ to be a local operator (e.g. at $(\vec{x},-t)\,$ in Eq.\,(\ref{eq:C0})), but this is not necessary for our discussion. Any interpolating operator for the pion on the chosen time slice would do equally well.
Having determined ${\cal A}_0$ and hence the amplitude $\bar{u}_{\nu_\ell\,\alpha}(p_{\nu_\ell})(M_0)_{\alpha\beta}\,v_{\ell\,\beta}(p_\ell)$, the $O(\alpha^0)$ contribution to the decay width is readily obtained
\begin{equation}
\Gamma_0^{\mathrm{tree}}(\pi^+\to\ell^+\nu_{\ell})=\frac{G_F^2\,|V_{ud}|^2f_\pi^2}{8\pi}\,m_\pi\,m_\ell^2\left(1-\frac{m_\ell^2}{m_\pi^2}\right)^{\!\!2}\,. \label{eq:loG}
\end{equation}
In this equation we use the label {\footnotesize tree} to denote the absence of electromagnetic effects since the subscript {\footnotesize $0$} here indicates that there are no photons in the final state.
\subsection{Calculation at $O(\alpha)$}\label{subsec:Oalpha}
\begin{figure}[t]
\includegraphics[width=0.29\hsize]{figs/Diag1.eps}\qquad
\includegraphics[width=0.29\hsize]{figs/Diag2.eps}\qquad
\includegraphics[width=0.29\hsize]{figs/Diag3.eps}\\[0.3cm]
\includegraphics[width=0.29\hsize]{figs/Diag4.eps}\qquad
\includegraphics[width=0.29\hsize]{figs/Diag5.eps}\qquad
\includegraphics[width=0.29\hsize]{figs/Diag6.eps}
\caption{Connected diagrams contributing at $O(\alpha)$ contribution to the amplitude for the decay $\pi^+\to\ell^+\nu_l$.\label{fig:virtualNLO}}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure}[t]
\includegraphics[width=0.29\hsize]{figs/Disc1.eps}\qquad
\includegraphics[width=0.29\hsize]{figs/Disc2.eps}
\qquad \includegraphics[width=0.29\hsize]{figs/Disc3.eps}\\[0.3cm]
\includegraphics[width=0.29\hsize]{figs/Disc4.eps}\qquad
\includegraphics[width=0.29\hsize]{figs/Disc5.eps}
\caption{Disconnected diagrams contributing at $O(\alpha)$ contribution to the amplitude for the decay $\pi^+\to\ell^+\nu_l$. The curly line represents the photon and a sum over quark flavours $q$, $q_1$ and $q_2$ is to be performed.\label{fig:virtualNLOdisc}}
\end{figure}
We now consider the one-photon exchange contributions to the decay
$\pi^+\to\ell^+\nu_\ell$ and show the corresponding six connected diagrams in Fig.\,\ref{fig:virtualNLO} and the disconnected diagrams in Fig.\,\ref{fig:virtualNLOdisc}. By ``disconnected" here we mean that there is a sea-quark loop connected, as usual, to the remainder of the diagram by a photon and/or gluons (the presence of the gluons is implicit in the diagrams).
The photon propagator in these diagrams in the Feynman gauge and in infinite (Euclidean) volume is given by
\begin{equation}
\delta_{\mu\nu}\Delta(x_1,x_2)=\delta_{\mu\nu}\int\frac{d^4k}{(2\pi)^4}~\frac{e^{ik\cdot(x_1-x_2)}}{k^2}\,.
\end{equation}
In a finite volume the momentum integration is replaced by a summation over the momenta which are allowed by the boundary conditions.
For periodic boundary conditions, we can neglect the contributions from the zero-mode $k=0$ since a very soft photon does not resolve the structure of the pion and its effects cancel in $\Gamma_0-\Gamma_0^\mathrm{pt}$ in Eq.\,(\ref{eq:master}).
Although we evaluate $\Gamma_0+\Gamma_1(\Delta E)$ (see Eq.~(\ref{eq:Gamma01})) in perturbation theory directly in infinite volume, we note that the same cancellation would happen
if one were to compute $\Gamma_1(\Delta E)$ also in a finite volume.
Moreover from a spectral analysis we conclude that such a cancellation also occurs in the Euclidean correlators from which the different contributions to the decay rates are extracted. For this reason in the following $\Gamma_0$ and $\Gamma_0^\mathrm{pt}$ are evaluated separately but using the following expression for the photon propagator in finite volume:
\begin{equation}
\delta_{\mu\nu}\Delta(x_1,x_2)=\delta_{\mu\nu}\,\frac{1}{L^4}\sum_{k=\frac{2\pi}{L}n;\,k\,\neq 0}~\frac{e^{ik\cdot(x_1-x_2)}}{4\sum_\rho\sin^2\frac{k_\rho}{2}}\,, \label{eq:pp}
\end{equation}
where all quantities are in lattice units and the expression corresponds to the simplest lattice discretisation. $k$, $n$, $x_1$ and $x_2$ are four component vectors and for illustration we have taken the temporal and spatial extents of the lattice to be the same ($L$).
For other quantities, the presence of zero momentum excitations of the photon field is a subtle issue that has to be handled with some care. In the case of the hadron spectrum the problem has been studied in~\cite{Hayakawa:2008an} and, more recently in~\cite{Borsanyi:2014jba,Basak:2014vca}, where
it has been shown, at $O(\alpha)$, that the quenching of zero momentum modes corresponds in the infinite-volume limit to the removal of sets of measure zero from the functional integral and that finite volume effects are different for the different prescriptions.
We now divide the discussion of the diagrams in Fig.\,\ref{fig:virtualNLO} and Fig.\,\ref{fig:virtualNLOdisc} into three classes: those in which the photon is attached at both ends to the quarks (diagrams \ref{fig:virtualNLO}(a)-\ref{fig:virtualNLO}(c) and \ref{fig:virtualNLOdisc}(a), (b) and (d)), those in which the photon propagates between one of the quarks and the outgoing lepton (diagrams \ref{fig:virtualNLO}(e), \ref{fig:virtualNLO}(f) and \ref{fig:virtualNLOdisc}(c)) and finally diagram \ref{fig:virtualNLO}(d) which corresponds to the mass and wave-function normalisation of the charged lepton. We have already discussed the treatment of the wave function renormalisation of the lepton in detail in Sec.\,\ref{sec:structure} so we now turn to the remaining diagrams.
\subsubsection{The evaluation of diagrams Fig.\,\ref{fig:virtualNLO}(a)-(c) and Fig.\,\ref{fig:virtualNLOdisc}(a),(b) and (d)}\label{sec:diagsac}
We start by considering the connected diagrams \ref{fig:virtualNLO}(a)-(c). For these diagrams, the leptonic contribution to the amplitude is contained in the factor $ \big[\bar{u}_{\nu_\ell}(p_{\nu_\ell})\gamma^\nu(1-\gamma^5)\,v_\ell(p_\ell)\big]$ and we need to compute the Euclidean hadronic correlation function
\begin{equation}\label{eq:c1}
C_1(t)=-\frac12\int\,d^3\vec{x}\,d^{\,4}\hspace{-1pt}x_1\,d^{\,4}\hspace{-1pt}x_2~\langle 0|T\big\{J_W^\nu(0)\,j_\mu(x_1)j_\mu(x_2)\phi^\dagger(\vec{x},-t)\big\}\,|\,0\rangle~\Delta(x_1,x_2)\,.
\end{equation}
where $T$ represents time-ordering, $J_W^\nu$ is the $V\textrm{--}A$ current $\bar{d}\gamma^\nu(1-\gamma^5)\,u$ and we take $-t<0$. $j_\mu$ is the hadronic component of the electromagnetic current and we find it convenient to include the charges of the quarks $Q_f$ in the definition of $j$:
\begin{equation}
j_\mu(x)=\sum_f\,Q_f\,\bar{f}(x)\gamma_\mu f(x)\,,
\end{equation}
where the sum is over all quark flavours $f$.
The factor of $1/2$ is the standard combinatorial one.
The computations are performed in Euclidean space and in a finite-volume with the photon propagator $\Delta$ given in Eq.\,(\ref{eq:pp}) (or the corresponding expression for other lattice discretisations).
The absence of the zero mode in the photon propagator implies a gap between $m_\pi$ and the energies of the other eigenstates. Provided one can separate the contributions of these heavier states from that of the pion, one can perform the continuation of the correlation function in Eq.\,(\ref{eq:c1}) from Minkowski to Euclidean space without encountering any singularities. From the correlation function $C_1(t)$ we obtain the electromagnetic shift in the mass of the pion and also a contribution to the physical decay amplitude, as we now explain. For sufficiently large $t$ the correlation function is dominated by the ground state, i.e. the pion, and we have
\begin{equation}\label{eq:c01}
C_0(t)+C_1(t)\simeq \frac{e^{-m_\pi t}}{2m_\pi}\,Z^\phi\,\langle \,0\,|J^0_W(0)\,|\,\pi^+\rangle\,,
\end{equation}
where the electromagnetic terms are included in all factors (up to $O(\alpha)$). Writing $m_\pi=m_\pi^0+\delta m_\pi$, where $\delta m_\pi$ is the $O(\alpha)$ mass shift,
\begin{equation}
e^{-m_\pi t}\simeq e^{-m_\pi^0 t}\,(1-\delta m_\pi\,t)
\end{equation}
so that $C_1(t)$ is of the schematic form
\begin{equation}
C_1(t)=C_0(t)\,(c_1\,t+c_2)\,.
\end{equation}
By determining $c_1$ we obtain the electromagnetic mass shift, $\delta m_\pi=-c_1$, and from $c_2$ we obtain the electromagnetic correction to $Z^\phi\,\langle \,0\,|J_W(0)\,|\,\pi^+\rangle/2m_\pi$\,. Note that $\delta m_\pi$ is gauge invariant and infrared finite, whereas the coefficient $c_2$ obtained from these diagrams is neither.
In order to obtain the contribution to the $\pi\to\ell\nu_\ell$ decay amplitude ${\cal A}$ we need to remove the factor $(e^{-m_\pi t}/2m_\pi) Z^\phi$ on the right-hand side of Eq.\,(\ref{eq:c01}), including the $O(\alpha)$ corrections to this factor. Having determined $c_1$, we are in a position to subtract the corrections present in $m_\pi$. The $O(\alpha)$ corrections to $Z^\phi$ are determined in the standard way, by performing the corresponding calculation to $C_1(t)$ but with the axial current $A$ replaced by $\phi$:
\begin{eqnarray}
C_1^{\phi\phi}(t)&=&-\frac12\int\,d^3\vec{x}\,d^4x_1\,d^4x_2~\langle 0|T\big\{\phi(\vec{0},0)\,j_\mu(x_1)j_\mu(x_2)\phi^\dagger(\vec{x},t)\big\}\,|\,0\rangle\,\Delta(x_1,x_2)\\
&=&C_0^{\phi\phi}(t)(c_1t+c_2^{\phi\phi})\,.
\end{eqnarray}
We finally obtain
\begin{equation}
Z^\phi=Z^\phi_0\left(1+\frac12\bigg(c_2^{\phi\phi}-\frac{c_1}{m_\pi^0}\bigg)\right)\,,
\end{equation}
and the $O(\alpha)$ contribution to the amplitude from these three diagrams is
\begin{equation}
\delta{\cal A}={\cal A}_0\,\bigg(c_2-\frac{c_2^{\phi\phi}}{2}-\frac{c_1}{2m_\pi^0}\bigg)\,.
\end{equation}
For these three diagrams the $O(\alpha)$ term can be simply considered as a correction to $f_\pi$. Note however, that such an ``$f_\pi$" would not be a physical quantity as it contains infrared divergences.
The treatment of the disconnected diagrams in Figs.\,\ref{fig:virtualNLOdisc}(a), (b) and (d) follows in exactly the same way. These diagrams contribute to the electromagnetic corrections to both the pion mass and the decay amplitude in an analogous way to the discussion of the connected diagrams above . It is standard and straightforward to write down the corresponding correlation functions in terms of quark propagators. We do not discuss here the different possibilities for generating the necessary quark propagators to evaluate the diagrams; for example we can imagine using sequential propagators or some techniques to generate all-to-all quark propagators.
\subsubsection{The evaluation of diagrams Fig.\,\ref{fig:virtualNLO}(e)-(f)}
For these diagrams the leptonic and hadronic contributions do not factorise and indeed the contribution cannot be written simply in terms of the parameter $f_\pi$. We start by considering the Minkowski space quantity
\begin{eqnarray}\label{eq:diagsef1}
\bar{u}_{\nu_\ell\,\alpha}(p_{\nu_\ell})(\bar M_1)_{\alpha\beta}\,v_{\ell\,\beta}(p_\ell)&=&
-\int\!d^{\,4}\hspace{-1pt}x_1\,d^{\,4}\hspace{-1pt}x_2\, \bra{0}\,T(j_\mu(x_1) J^\nu_W(0))\,\ket{\pi}
\\
&&\hspace{-1in}\times
\,i D_M(x_1,x_2)
\big\{\bar{u}_{\nu_\ell}(p_{\nu_\ell}) \gamma^\nu(1-\gamma^5)(i S_M(x_2))\gamma^\mu v_\ell(p_\ell)\big\}e^{ip_\ell\cdot x_2}\,, \nonumber
\end{eqnarray}
where $iS_M$ and $iD_M$ are the lepton and (Feynman gauge) photon propagators respectively in Minkowski space (more precisely the photon propagator with Lorentz indices
$(\rho,\sigma)$ is $iD_Mg_{\rho\sigma}$, but the Lorentz indices have been contracted with the electromagnetic currents in (\ref{eq:diagsef1})). In order to demonstrate that we can obtain the $O(\alpha)$ corrections to the decay amplitude from a Euclidean space correlation function,
we use the reduction formula to rewrite the expression in Eq.\,(\ref{eq:diagsef1}) as
\begin{eqnarray}
&&\bar{u}_{\nu_\ell\,\alpha}(p_{\nu_\ell})(\bar M_1)_{\alpha\beta}\,v_{\ell\,\beta}(p_\ell)=
i \lim_{k_0 \rightarrow m_\pi} ({k_0}^2 - m_\pi^2)
\int d^4x_1\, d^4x_2\, d^4x\, e^{-ik^0 x^0}\,
\nonumber\\
&&\hspace{-0.3in}
\bra{0}T(j_\mu(x_1) J^\nu_W (0) \pi (x)) \ket{0}\,
i D_M(x_1,x_2)
\big[\bar{u}_{\nu_\ell}(p_{\nu_\ell}) \gamma_{\nu}(1-\gamma^5)(i S_M(x_2))\gamma^\mu v_\ell(p_\ell)\big]
e^{ip_\ell\cdot x_2}\, ,\label{eq:reduction}
\end{eqnarray}
where $\pi(x)$ is the field which creates a pion with amplitude 1. On the other hand
the Euclidean space correlation function which we propose to compute is
\begin{eqnarray}
\bar C_1(t)_{\alpha\beta}&=&-\int\! d^3\vec{x}\,d^4x_1\,d^4x_2~\langle 0|T\big\{J^\nu_W(0)\,j_\mu(x_1)\phi^\dagger(\vec{x},-t)\big\}|\,0\rangle~\Delta(x_1,x_2)\nonumber\\
&&\hspace{0.7in}\times \big(\gamma_\nu(1-\gamma^5)S(0,x_2)\gamma_\mu\big)_{\alpha\beta}\, e^{E_\ell\,t_2}e^{-i\vec{p}_\ell\cdot \vec{x}_2}.\label{eq:c2}
\end{eqnarray}
Here $S$ and $\Delta$ are Euclidean propagators, and $\alpha,\beta$ are spinor indices.
Similarly to the discussion in Sec.~\ref{sec:diagsac}, provided that the pion is the lightest hadronic state then for large $t$, $\bar C_1(t)$ is dominated by the matrix element with a single pion in the initial state.
\begin{figure}[t]
\includegraphics[width=0.25\hsize]{figs/llgammavertex.eps}\qquad\qquad
\caption{Zoom of the lepton-photon vertex at $x_2$ from the diagrams in Fig.\,\ref{fig:virtualNLO}(e) and (f). \label{fig:llgamma}}
\end{figure}
In view of the factor $e^{E_\ell\,t_2}$ on the right-hand side of Eq.\,(\ref{eq:c2}), the
new feature in the evaluation of the diagrams in Fig.\,\ref{fig:virtualNLO}\,(e) and (f) is that we need to ensure that the $t_2$ integration converges as $|t_2|\to\infty$. For $t_2<0$ the convergence of the integral is improved by the presence of the exponential factor and so we limit the discussion to the case $t_2\to\infty$. $E_\ell=\sqrt{m_\ell^2+\vec{p}_\ell^{~2}}$ is the energy of the outgoing charged lepton with three-momentum $\vec{p}_\ell$. To determine the $t_2\to\infty$ behaviour, consider the lepton-photon vertex at $x_2$ from the diagrams in Fig.\,\ref{fig:virtualNLO}(e) and (f), redrawn in Fig.\,\ref{fig:llgamma}. $k_\ell$ and $k_\gamma$ are the four-momentum variables in the Fourier transform of the propagators $S(x_2)$ and $\Delta(x_1,x_2)$ respectively in Eqs.\,(\ref{eq:diagsef1})\,-\,(\ref{eq:c2}).
The $t_2$ integration is indeed convergent as we now show explicitly.\\
1. The integration over $\vec{x}_2$ implies three-momentum conservation at this vertex so that in the sum over the momenta $\vec{k}_\ell+\vec{k}_\gamma=\vec{p}_l$, where $p_\ell$ is the momentum of the outgoing charged lepton.\\
2. The integrations over the energies $k_{4\,\ell}$ and $k_{4\,\gamma}$ lead to the exponential factor $e^{-(\omega_\ell+\omega_\gamma)t_2}$, where $\omega_\ell=\sqrt{\vec{k}_\ell^{\,2}+m_\ell^2}$, $\omega_\gamma=\sqrt{\vec{k}_\gamma^{\,2}+m_\gamma^2}$, and $m_\gamma$ is the mass of the photon introduced as an infra-red cut-off. The large $t_2$ behaviour is therefore given by the factor
$e^{-(\omega_\ell+\omega_\gamma-E_\ell)t_2}$.\\
3. A simple kinematical exercise shows that in the sum over $\vec{k}_\gamma$ (with $\vec{k}_\ell=\vec{p}_\ell-\vec{k}_\gamma$), the minimum value of $\omega_\ell+\omega_\gamma$ is given by
\begin{equation}
(\omega_\ell+\omega_\gamma)_\mathrm{min}=\sqrt{(m_\ell+m_\gamma)^2+\vec{p}_\ell^{~2}}\,.
\end{equation}
4. Thus for non-zero $m_\gamma$, the exponent in $e^{-(\omega_\ell+\omega_\gamma -E_\ell)t_2}$ for large $t_2$ is negative for every term in the summation over $k_\gamma$ and the integral over $t_2$ is convergent so that the continuation from Minkowski to Euclidean space can be performed.\\
5. We note that the integration over $t_2$ is also convergent if we set $m_\gamma=0$ but remove the $\vec{k}=0$ mode in finite volume. In this case $\omega_\ell+\omega_\gamma>E_l+[1-(p_\ell/E_\ell)]|\vec{k}_\mathrm{min}|$.
In summary the $t_2$ integration is convergent because for every term in the sum over momenta $\omega_\ell+\omega_\gamma>E_l$ and so for sufficiently large $t$ we can write
\begin{equation}\label{eq:c2M}
\bar C_1(t)_{\alpha\beta}\simeq Z^\phi_0\,\frac{e^{-m_\pi^0t}}{2m_\pi^0}\,(\bar M_1)_{\alpha\beta}
\end{equation}
and the contribution from the diagrams of Fig.\,\ref{fig:virtualNLO}(e) and \ref{fig:virtualNLO}(f) is $\bar{u}_\alpha(p_{\nu_\ell})(\bar M_1)_{\alpha\beta}v_\beta(p_\ell)$.
This completes the demonstration that the Minkowski-space amplitude (\ref{eq:reduction}) is equal to the pion contribution to the Euclidean correlation function (\ref{eq:c2}), up to a factor $Z_0^\phi$ which accounts for the normalisation of the pion field.
Again the evaluation of the correction to the amplitude from the disconnected diagram in Fig.\,\ref{fig:virtualNLOdisc}(c) follows in an analogous way.
\section{Calculation of $\Gamma^\mathrm{pt}(\Delta E)$}\label{sec:Gamma1}
The evaluation in perturbation theory of the total width $\Gamma^\mathrm{pt}= \Gamma_0^{\mathrm{pt}}+\Gamma_1^\mathrm{pt}$ in infinite volume, was performed by Berman and Kinoshita in 1958/9~\cite{Berman:1958ti,Kinoshita:1959ha}, using the Pauli-Villars regulator for the ultraviolet divergences and a photon mass to regulate the infrared divergences in both $\Gamma_0^{\mathrm{pt}}$ and $\Gamma_1^\mathrm{pt}$. $\Gamma_1^\mathrm{pt}$ is the rate for process $\pi^+\to\ell^+\nu_\ell\,\gamma$ for a pointlike pion with the energy of the photon integrated over the full kinematic range. We have added the label {\footnotesize pt} in $\Gamma_1^\mathrm{pt}$ to remind us that
the integration includes contributions from regions of phase space in which the photon is not sufficiently soft for the structure of the pion to be reliably neglected. We do not include this label when writing $\Gamma_1(\Delta E)$ because we envisage that $\Delta E$ is sufficiently small so that the pointlike approximation reproduces the full calculation.
In our calculation, $\Gamma_0^{\mathrm{pt}}$ is evaluated in the W-regularisation, so that the ultra-violet divergences are replaced by logarithms of $M_W$.
For convenience we rewrite here the expression for $ \Gamma^\mathrm{pt}(\Delta E)$ from Eq.\,(\ref{eq:twoquantities})
\begin{eqnarray} \Gamma^\mathrm{pt}(\Delta E) = \Gamma_0^{\mathrm{pt}} + \Gamma_1(\Delta E) = \Gamma_0^{\mathrm{tree}}+ \Gamma_0^{\alpha,\mathrm{pt}}+ \Gamma_0^{\mathrm{(d),pt}}+ \Gamma_1(\Delta E)\,. \label{eq:gammadeltaf} \end{eqnarray}
$\Gamma_0^{\mathrm{tree}}$ and $ \Gamma_0^{\mathrm{(d)},\mathrm{pt}}$ have already been presented in Eqs.~(\ref{eq:loG}) and (\ref{eq:leptonwfpt}) respectively. In the following we give separately the results of the remaining contributions to $\Gamma^\mathrm{pt}(\Delta E)$ also using a photon mass $m_\gamma$ as the infrared regulator. We neglect powers of $m_\gamma$ in all the results.
In the perturbative calculation we use the following Lagrangian for the interaction of a point-like pion with the leptons:
\begin{eqnarray}
\mathcal{L}_{\pi-\ell-\nu_\ell} &=&i\, G_F f_\pi V_{ud}^* ~ \left\{(\partial_\mu -ieA_\mu) \pi\right\} \, \left\{\bar{\psi}_ {\nu_\ell} \frac{1+\gamma_5}{2} \gamma^\mu \psi_\ell\right\} +
\mathrm{Hermitian~conjugate}\,.
\label{eq:covdervertex}\end{eqnarray}
The corresponding Feynman rules are:
\begin{eqnarray}
\includegraphics[width=0.5\hsize]{figs/pilnu.eps}\label{eq:covdervertexrule}\\
\includegraphics[width=0.5\hsize]{figs/piphlnu.eps}\nonumber
\end{eqnarray}
In addition we have used the standard Feynman rules of scalar electromagnetism for the interactions of charged pions in an electromagnetic field.
\begin{figure}
\includegraphics[width=0.6\hsize]{figs/freelself.eps}
\caption{One loop diagrams contributing to the wave-function renormalisation of a point-like pion.\label{fig:freelself}}
\end{figure}
We start by giving the $O(\alpha)$ contributions to $\Gamma_0^{\alpha,\mathrm{pt}}$.\\
\noindent $\bullet$ {\it Wave function renormalisation of the pion}: The contribution of the pion wave function renormalisation to $\Gamma_0^{\alpha,\mathrm{pt}}$ is obtained from the diagrams in Fig.\,\ref{fig:freelself}
and is given by
\begin{equation}
\Gamma_0^{\mathrm{\pi} }= \Gamma_0^{\mathrm{tree}} \times \frac{\alpha}{4 \pi} \, Z_\pi\,,\quad\mathrm{where}\quad
Z_\pi = - 2 \log\left(\frac{m_\pi^2}{M_W^2}\right) - 2 \log\left(\frac{m_\gamma^2}{m_\pi^2}\right) -\frac{3}{2} \, .
\label{eq:zpi} \end{equation}
These diagrams correspond to those in Fig.~\ref{fig:virtualNLO}(a), Fig.~\ref{fig:virtualNLO}(b) and Fig.~\ref{fig:virtualNLO}(c) in the composite case.
\begin{figure}[t]
\includegraphics[width=0.295\hsize]{figs/kinod.eps}\qquad\includegraphics[width=0.295\hsize]{figs/kinodb.eps}
\qquad\includegraphics[width=0.295\hsize]{figs/kinodc.eps}
\caption{Radiative corrections to the pion-lepton vertex. The diagrams represent $O(\alpha)$ contributions to $\Gamma_0^\mathrm{pt}$. The left part of each diagram represents a contribution to the amplitude and the right part the tree-level contribution to the hermitian conjugate of the amplitude. The corresponding diagrams containing the radiative correction on the right-hand side of each diagram are also included.\label{fig:kinod}}
\end{figure}
\noindent $\bullet$~{\it $\pi$\,-\,$\ell$ Vertex}: The remaining graphs contributing to $\Gamma_0^{\alpha,\mathrm{pt}}$ are the $\pi$\,-\,$\ell$ vertex corrections from the diagrams shown in Fig.\,\ref{fig:kinod} and their complex conjugates.
The contribution from these diagrams is
\begin{eqnarray} \Gamma_0^{\mathrm{\pi-\ell} }&=& \Gamma_0^{\mathrm{tree}} \times \frac{\alpha}{4 \pi} \, Z_{\pi-\ell}\quad\mathrm{where}\\ \label{eq:pionl}
&&\hspace{-1in}Z_{\pi-\ell} = -2 \frac{1+ r_\ell^2}{1- r_\ell^2} \, \log\left( r_\ell^2\right) \, \log\left(\frac{m_\gamma^2}{m_\pi^2}\right) + 4 \log\left(\frac{m_\pi^2}{M_W^2}\right)
+ \nonumber\\ &&\hspace{0.5in} \frac{1+ r_\ell^2}{1- r_\ell^2} \, \log^2\left( r_\ell^2\right) + 2 \frac{1-3 r_\ell^2}{1- r_\ell^2} \, \log\left( r_\ell^2\right) -1 \, , \label{eq:zpil} \end{eqnarray}
and $r_\ell = m_\ell/m_\pi$.
These diagrams correspond to the diagrams Fig.~\ref{fig:virtualNLO}(e) and Fig.~\ref{fig:virtualNLO}(f) in the composite pion case.
Next we give the contributions to $\Gamma_1(\Delta E)$ where the real photon is emitted and absorbed by the pion ($\pi\pi$), the charged lepton ($\ell\ell$) or emitted by the pion and absorbed by the lepton or vice-versa ($\pi\ell$). The results are presented in the Feynman gauge:
\begin{equation}
\sum_r \varepsilon^\star_\mu(k,r)\, \varepsilon_\nu(k,r) = g_{\mu\nu} \;,
\end{equation}
where $\varepsilon_\mu(k,r)$ are the polarisation vectors of the real photon carrying a momentum $k$, with $k^2=0$ in Minkowski space.
\begin{figure}
\includegraphics[width=0.29\hsize]{figs/realpipi.eps}\qquad\includegraphics[width=0.29\hsize]{figs/realll.eps}
\qquad\includegraphics[width=0.29\hsize]{figs/realpil.eps}\\[0.2in]
\includegraphics[width=0.29\hsize]{figs/realvpi.eps}\qquad\includegraphics[width=0.29\hsize]{figs/realvl.eps}
\qquad\includegraphics[width=0.29\hsize]{figs/realvv.eps}
\caption{Diagrams contributing to $\Gamma_1(\Delta E)$. For diagrams (c), (d) and (e) the ``conjugate" contributions in which the photon vertices on the left and right of each diagram are interchanged are also to be included.\label{fig:realpt}}
\end{figure}
\noindent$\bullet$~{\it Real photon emission, $\pi \pi$}: The contribution to $\Gamma_1(\Delta E)$ from the emission and absorption of a real photon from the pion, represented by diagram (a) in Fig.\,\ref{fig:realpt},
is given by
\begin{eqnarray} \hspace{1in}\Gamma_1^{\pi\pi} &=& \Gamma_0^{\mathrm{tree}} \times \frac{\alpha}{4 \pi} \,\left( R_1^{\pi\pi}+ R_2^{\pi\pi} \right) \, ,\quad\mathrm{where} \label{eq:pionpion}
\\ \nonumber\\
&&\hspace{-1.8in}R_1^{\pi\pi}= 2 \log\left(\frac{m_\gamma^2}{4\Delta E^2}\right) +4\,,\quad R_2^{\pi\pi}=
\frac{2r_\ell^4}{(1-r_\ell^2)^2}\, \log(1-r_E)
+\frac{r_E\left( 6-r_E-4r_\ell^2\right)}{(1-r_\ell^2)^2}
\; ,
\end{eqnarray}
$r_E = 2 \Delta E/m_\pi$ and $0 \le r_E \le 1-r_\ell^2$. Here we have separated $R_1^{\pi\pi}$, the contribution in the eikonal approximation from $R_2^{\pi\pi}$ which vanishes as $\Delta E \to 0$. In the eikonal approximation only the leading terms in the photon's momenta are kept in the numerator and denominator of the integrand as $r_E\to 0$. $R_1^{\pi\pi}$ contains the infrared divergence.
\noindent$\bullet$~{\it Real photon emission, $\ell\ell$}:
The contribution
to $\Gamma_1(\Delta E)$ from the emission and absorption of a real photon from the charged lepton, represented by the diagram (b) in Fig.\,\ref{fig:realpt},
is given by
\begin{eqnarray} \Gamma_1^{ \ell \ell} = \Gamma_0^{\mathrm{tree}} \times \frac{\alpha}{4 \pi} \,\left( R_1^{ \ell \ell}+ R_2^{ \ell \ell} \right) \, ,\quad\mathrm{where} \label{eq:leplep} \end{eqnarray}
\begin{eqnarray}
R_1^{\ell\ell}&=&
2 \log\left(\frac{m_\gamma^2}{4\Delta E^2}\right)
-2\frac{1+r_\ell^2}{1-r_\ell^2} \log(r_\ell^2)
\; ,\quad\mathrm{and}
\nonumber \\
\nonumber \\
R_2^{\ell\ell}&=&
\frac{r_E^2-1 + (4 r_E-6) r_\ell^2}{(1-r_\ell^2)^2}\ \log(1-r_E)
-\frac{r_E(r_E + 4 r_\ell^2)}{(1-r_\ell^2)^2}\ \log(r_\ell^2)\nonumber\\
&&\hspace{1in}+\frac{r_E(6 - 3 r_E - 20 r_\ell^2)}{2(1-r_\ell^2)^2}
\; .\end{eqnarray}
\noindent$\bullet$~{\it Real photon emission, $ \pi \ell$}: Finally, the contribution
to $\Gamma_1(\Delta E)$ from the emission of a real photon from the pion and its absorption by the charged lepton, represented by the diagrams (c)\,--\,(f) in Fig.\,\ref{fig:realpt},
is given by
\begin{eqnarray} \Gamma_1^{ \pi \ell} = \Gamma_0^{\mathrm{tree}} \times \frac{\alpha}{4 \pi} \,\left( R_1^{ \pi \ell}+ R_2^{ \pi \ell} \right) \, , \label{eq:rleplep} \end{eqnarray}
where \begin{eqnarray}
R_1^{\pi\ell}&=&
2\frac{1+r_\ell^2}{1-r_\ell^2}\log(r_\ell^2)
\log\left(\frac{m_\gamma^2}{4\Delta E^2}\right)
-\frac{1+r_\ell^2}{1-r_\ell^2}\left[\log(r_\ell^2)\right]^2
-4\frac{1+r_\ell^2}{1-r_\ell^2}\,\mbox{Li}_2(1-r_\ell^2)
\quad\mathrm{and}
\nonumber \\
\nonumber \\
R_2^{\pi\ell}&=&
-2\, \frac{2 r_E + r_\ell^4-2}{(1-r_\ell^2)^2}\,\log(1-r_E)
+\frac{4r_E}{(1-r_\ell^2)^2}\,\log(r_\ell^2)
+\frac{r_E(2 + r_E)}{(1-r_\ell^2)^2}
-4\,\frac{1+r_\ell^2}{1-r_\ell^2}\ \mbox{Li}_2(r_E)
\,.
\nonumber \\
\label{eq:Rpiell}
\end{eqnarray}
Note that for diagrams (c), (d) and (e) we include the conjugate contribution in which the photon vertices are interchanged between the left and right parts of the diagrams. Thus for example, in addition to diagram (c) there is the diagram in which the photon is emitted from the lepton on the left and absorbed on the pion on the right.
We are now in a position to combine the results in Eqs.\,(\ref{eq:zpi})\,--\,(\ref{eq:Rpiell}) in order to obtain the
final expression for $\Gamma^\mathrm{pt}(\Delta E)$. As expected the infrared cutoff cancels and we find
\begin{eqnarray}
\Gamma^\mathrm{pt}(\Delta E) &=& \Gamma_0^{\mathrm{tree}} \times \left( 1+
\frac{\alpha}{4\pi}\ \Bigg\{
3 \log\left(\frac{m_\pi^2}{M_W^2}\right)+ \log\left(r_\ell^2\right) - 4 \log(r_E^2) +\frac{2- 10 r_\ell^2}{1-r_\ell^2} \log(r_\ell^2) \right.
\nonumber \\
\nonumber \\
&&\qquad\qquad\qquad-2\frac{1+r_\ell^2}{1-r_\ell^2}\ \log(r_E^2)\log(r_\ell^2) -4\frac{1+r_\ell^2}{1-r_\ell^2}\ \mbox{Li}_2(1-r_\ell^2)- 3
\nonumber \\
\nonumber \\
&&
+\Big[\frac{3 + r_E^2 - 6 r_\ell^2 + 4 r_E (-1 + r_\ell^2) }{(1-r_\ell^2)^2}\ \log(1-r_E)+\frac{r_E (4 - r_E -4 r_\ell^2)}{(1-r_\ell^2)^2}\ \log(r_\ell^2)
\nonumber \\
\nonumber \\
&&
\left.
\qquad\qquad
-\frac{r_E (-22 + 3 r_E +28 r_\ell^2)}{2(1-r_\ell^2)^2}
-4\frac{1+r_\ell^2}{1-r_\ell^2}\ \mbox{Li}_2(r_E)\Big]\
\Bigg\} \right) \; .
\label{eq:formulafinal}
\end{eqnarray}
Note that the terms in square brackets in eq.~(\ref{eq:formulafinal}) vanish when $r_E$ goes to zero; in this limit $\Gamma^\mathrm{pt}(\Delta E)$ is given by its eikonal approximation.
The total rate is readily computed by setting $r_E$ to its maximum value, namely $r_E=1-r_\ell^2$, giving
\begin{eqnarray}
\Gamma^\mathrm{pt} &=& \Gamma_0^{\mathrm{tree}} \times \Bigg\{ 1+
\frac{\alpha}{4\pi}\ \left(
3 \log\left(\frac{m_\pi^2}{M_W^2}\right) - 8 \log(1-r_\ell^2) -\frac{3 r_\ell^4}{(1-r_\ell^2)^2} \log(r_\ell^2) \right. \label{eq:formulafinalI}
\\
&&\hspace{-0.35in}\left. - 8 \frac{1+r_\ell^2}{1-r_\ell^2}\ \mbox{Li}_2(1-r_\ell^2)+\frac{13-19 r_\ell^2}{2(1-r_\ell^2)} + \frac{6 - 14 r_\ell^2 - 4(1+r_\ell^2)\log(1- r_\ell^2) }{1-r_\ell^2}\ \log(r_\ell^2)
\right) \Bigg\} \; . \nonumber
\end{eqnarray}
The result in Eq.~(\ref{eq:formulafinalI}) agrees with the well known results in literature~\cite{Berman:1958ti,Kinoshita:1958ru}, which provides an important check of our calculation. We believe that the result in Eq.\,(\ref{eq:formulafinal}) is new.
In the description of our method above, we limit the photon's energy to be smaller than $\Delta E$ to ensure that the photon is sufficiently soft for the pointlike approximation to be valid in the evaluation of $\Gamma_1(\Delta E)$. It is of course possible instead to impose a cut-off on the energy of the final-state lepton, requiring it to be close to its maximum value $E^{\mathrm{max}}_\ell = \frac{m_\pi}{2}(1+r_\ell^2)$. For completeness we also
give, up to $O(\Delta E_\ell)$, the distribution for $\Gamma^\mathrm{pt}(\Delta E_\ell)$ defined as
\begin{eqnarray}
\Gamma^\mathrm{pt}(\Delta E_\ell) = \int^{E^{max}_\ell}_{E^{max}_\ell - \Delta E_\ell } \, dE^\prime \, \frac{d\Gamma^\mathrm{pt}}{d E^\prime_\ell} \, , \end{eqnarray}
where $0\le \Delta E_\ell \le (m_\pi-m_\ell)^2/(2 m_\pi)$;
\begin{eqnarray}&&
\Gamma^\mathrm{pt}(\Delta E_\ell) = \Gamma_0^{\mathrm{tree}} \times \Bigg\{ 1+
\frac{\alpha}{4\pi}\, \bigg[
3 \log\left(\frac{m_\pi^2}{M_W^2}\right) + 8 \log\left( 1-r_\ell^2\right) - 7 \nonumber \\
&& \hspace{0.3in}+ \log\left( r_\ell^2\right)
\frac{3 - 7 r_\ell^2 + 8 \Delta E_\ell + 4 \left(1+r_\ell^2\right) \log\left(1-r_\ell^2\right)}{1-r_\ell^2} \label{eq:formuladel} \\
&& \hspace{1in}+\log\left( 2 \Delta E_\ell \right) \, \left( -8 -4 \frac{1+r_\ell^2}{1-r_\ell^2}\log\left(r_\ell^2\right) \right)
\bigg] \Bigg\} \,. \nonumber
\end{eqnarray}
\section{Regularisation and cancellation of infrared divergences in finite-volumes}\label{sec:ir}
In the previous section we have explicitly demonstrated the cancellation of infrared divergences in the perturbative quantity $\Gamma^\mathrm{pt}(\Delta E)$. This of course is simply the standard Bloch-Nordsieck cancellation~\cite{Bloch:1937pw}.
In this section we discuss in more detail the cancellation of infrared divergences in
\begin{eqnarray} \Delta \Gamma_0(L) = \tilde \Gamma_0^{\alpha} - \Gamma_0^{\alpha,\mathrm{pt}} \, . \label{eq:51} \end{eqnarray}
We have already explained in Sec.\,\ref{sec:structure} that the contribution of the lepton's wave function renormalisation in $\Delta\Gamma_0(L)$ is simply to introduce the tilde in $\tilde \Gamma_0^{\alpha}$, denoting that the corresponding contribution to the matching factor between the lattice and $W$-regularisations is to be removed. We also do not discuss further the evaluation of the remaining infrared-finite terms in the matching factor because these are straightforward to evaluate (see e.g. Eq.\,(\ref{eq:matchingWilsontilde}) for the Wilson action).
Here we concentrate on the remaining diagrams in Figs.~\ref{fig:virtualNLO} and \ref{fig:virtualNLOdisc} and the corresponding diagrams for the point-like meson.
Although the right-hand side of Eq.\,(\ref{eq:51}) is a difference of decay widths, since at this order the widths are linear in the $O(\alpha)$ virtual amplitude, we can equivalently consider the difference of the $O(\alpha)$ contributions to the amplitudes.
In order to reduce statistical fluctuations when performing the sum over the gauge field configurations, we define the ratios
\begin{eqnarray} R^{\alpha} = \frac{\tilde{\cal A}^\alpha}{{\cal A}_0} \, , \quad \quad R^{\alpha,\mathrm{pt}} = \frac{{\cal A}^{\alpha,\mathrm{pt}}}{{\cal A}_0} \, , \end{eqnarray}
where $\tilde{\cal A}^\alpha$ and ${\cal A}^{\alpha,\mathrm{pt}}$ are the $O(\alpha)$ amplitudes corresponding to the widths in Eq.\,(\ref{eq:51}). The non-perturbative amplitude $\tilde{\cal A}^\alpha$ is precisely the quantity that we propose to compute numerically in a lattice simulation. It is then combined with ${\cal A}^{\alpha,\mathrm{pt}}$, for which we have given the explicit expression in infinite volume in Sec.\,\ref{sec:Gamma1}.
In the calculation of ${\cal A}^{\alpha,\mathrm{pt}}$ we set the mass of the photon to zero and consider the theory on a finite volume of length $L$, which will be used as an infrared regulator. The form of the vertices and propagators is the same as in the infinite volume (the ultraviolet cutoff is provided by the W-regularisation), but the momenta are quantized $k_\mu = 2 \pi /L \times n_\mu = 2 \pi / (Na) \times n_\mu $ where $-\infty \le n_\mu \le +\infty$ and $N$ is the number of lattice sites in one direction, which for simplicity we take to be the same in all directions.
The calculation of $\tilde {\cal A}_0^{\alpha}$ is performed non perturbatively on the same finite volume as in the perturbative case, but in a numerical simulation and with the photon propagator defined as in Eq.\,(\ref{eq:pp}), which does not contain the zero mode. Indeed, as already discussed in Sec.~\ref{subsec:Oalpha}, the zero mode does not contribute to the difference
\begin{eqnarray} \Delta R(L) =R^{\alpha}-R^{\alpha,\mathrm{pt}}\,. \end{eqnarray}
This is a gauge invariant, ultraviolet and infrared finite quantity and for these reasons we expect that its finite volume effects are comparable to those affecting the $O(\alpha)$ corrections to the hadron masses (that are also gauge invariant, ultraviolet and infrared finite).
The formalism introduced in this paper was necessary because $\Gamma_0$ and $\Gamma_1$ are separately infrared divergent.
We should add that in principle any consistent regularisation of the infrared divergences is acceptable. The main criterion for the choice of the infrared regulator will be determined by the precision of the terms remaining after the cancellation of the infrared divergences in a numerical simulation.
\section{Summary and Prospects}\label{sec:concs}
Lattice calculations of some hadronic quantities are already approaching (or even reaching) $O(1\%)$ precision and we can confidently expect that the uncertainties will continue to be reduced in future simulations. At this level of precision, isospin-breaking effects, including electromagnetic corrections, must
be included in the determination of the relevant physical quantities. In this paper we present, for the first time, a method to compute electromagnetic effects in hadronic processes. For these quantities the presence of infrared divergences in the intermediate stages of the calculation makes the procedure much more complicated than is the case for the hadronic spectrum, for which calculations in several different approaches~\cite{Borsanyi:2014jba,deDivitiis:2013xla,Basak:2014vca,Ishikawa:2012ix,Aoki:2012st,Blum:2010ym}
already exist. In order to obtain physical decay widths (or cross sections) diagrams containing virtual photons must be combined with those corresponding to the emission of real photons. Only in this way are the infrared divergences cancelled. We stress that it is not sufficient simply to add the electromagnetic interaction to the quark action because, for any given process, the contributions corresponding to different numbers of real photons must be evaluated separately.
We have discussed in detail a specific case, namely the $O(\alpha)$ radiative corrections to the leptonic decay of charged pseudoscalar mesons. The method can however, be extended to many other processes, for example to semileptonic decays. The condition for the applicability of our strategy is that there is a mass gap between the decaying particle and the intermediate states generated by the emission of the photon, so that all of these states have higher energies than the mass of the initial hadron (in the rest frame of the initial hadron).
In the present paper, we have limited the discussion to real photons with energies which are much smaller than the QCD scale $\Lambda_{\mathrm{QCD}}$. This is not a limitation of our method and in the future one can envisage numerical simulations of contributions to the inclusive width from the emission of real photons with energies which do resolve the structure of the initial hadron. Such calculations can be performed in Euclidean space under the same conditions as above, i.e. providing that there is a mass gap.
In the calculation of electromagnetic corrections a general issue concerns finite-size effects. In this respect, our method reduces to the calculation of infrared-finite, gauge-invariant quantities for which we expect the finite-size corrections to be comparable to those encountered in the computation of the spectrum. This expectation will be checked in forthcoming numerical studies and studied theoretically in chiral perturbation theory. Indeed an analytical calculation of the finite-volume effects requires a detailed analysis of the form factors parametrising the structure dependent contributions (see. Eq.\,(\ref{eq:hsd})).
Although the implementation of our method is challenging, it is within reach of present lattice technology particularly as the relative precision necessary to make the results phenomenologically interesting is not exceedingly high. Since the effects we are calculating are, in general, of $O(1\%)$, calculating the electromagnetic corrections to a precision of 20\% or so would already be more than sufficient. As the techniques improve and computational resources increase, the determination of both the QCD and QED effects will become even more precise. We now look forward to implementing the method described in this paper in an actual numerical simulation.
\section*{Acknowledgements}
We are particularly grateful to W. Marciano, for helpful correspondence on the renormalisation of the electromagnetic corrections, to M. Sozzi for advice on experimental photon resolutions and to F. Sanfillipo and G.C. Rossi for discussions. Work partially supported by the ERC-2010 DaMESyFla Grant Agreement Number: 267985, by the MIUR (Italy) under a contract PRIN10 and by STFC Grants ST/J000396/1 and ST/L000296/1.
|
\section{Reminder and motivation}
The free Jacobi process $(J_t)_{t \geq 0}$ was introduced in \cite{Demni} as the large-size limit of the Hermitian matrix Jacobi process (\cite{Dou}). It is built as the radial part of the compression of the free unitary Brownian motion $(Y_t)_{t \geq 0}$ (\cite{Biane}) by two orthogonal projections $\{P,Q\}$:
\begin{equation*}
J_t := PY_tQY_t^{*}P.
\end{equation*}
In this definition, both families of operators $\{P,Q\}$ and $(Y_t)_{t \geq 0}$ are $*$-free (in Voiculescu's sense) in a von Neumann algebra $\mathscr{A}$ endowed with a finite trace $\tau$ and a unit ${\bf 1}$. When $J_t$ is
considered as a positive operator valued in the compressed algebra $(P\mathscr{A}P, \tau/\tau(P))$, its spectral distribution $\mu_t$\footnote{In this introductory part, we ommit the dependence of our notations on $\{P,Q\}$.} is a probability distribution supported in $[0,1]$ and the positive real number $\tau(P) \mu_t\{1\}$ encodes the general position property for $\{P, Y_tQY_t^{*}\}$ (\cite{Col-Kem}, \cite{Izu-Ued}). On the other hand, the couple of papers \cite{Dem-Ham-Hmi} and \cite{Dem-Hmi} aim to determine the Lebesgue decomposition of $\mu_t$ when both projections coincide $P=Q$. In particular, when $\tau(P) = 1/2$, a complete description was given in \cite{Dem-Ham-Hmi} (see Corollary 3.3 there and \cite{Izu-Ued} for another proof): at any time $t \geq 0$, $\mu_t$ coincides with the spectral distribution of
\begin{equation*}
\frac{Y_{2t}+Y_{2t}^{*}+2{\bf 1}}{4}
\end{equation*}
considered as a positive operator in $(\mathscr{A}, \tau)$ (the spectral distribution of $Y_{2t}$, say $\eta_{2t}$, was described in \cite{Biane1}, Proposition 10). For an arbitrary rank $\tau(P) \in (0,1)$, only the discrete part in the Lebesgue decomposition of $\mu_t$ was determined in \cite{Dem-Hmi} (see Theorem 1.1). As to its absolutely-continuous part with respect to Lebesgue measure in $[0,1]$, it was related to that of the spectral distribution, say $\nu_t$, of the unitary operator
\begin{equation*}
U_t := RY_tRY_t^{*}, \quad R := 2P-{\bf 1}.
\end{equation*}
Actually, the density of the former distribution is related to the density of the latter through the Caratheodory extension of the Riemann map of the cut plane $\mathbb{C} \setminus [1,\infty[$ (\cite{Dem-Hmi}, Theorem 1.1).
The key ingredient leading to this partial description is a flow $\psi_{t}$ so far defined and exploited in an interval of the form $(-1,z_t)$ for some $z_t \in (0,1), t > 0$. When $\tau(P) = 1/2$, $\psi_{t}$ is a one-to-one map from a Jordan domain onto the open unit disc $\mathbb{D}$ and its compositional inverse coincides, up to a Cayley transform, with the Herglotz transform of $\eta_{2t}$. For arbitrary ranks, $\psi_t$ is locally invertible and further information on $\nu_t$ (which in turn provide information on $\mu_t$) necessitates the investigation of the analytic extension of of the local inverse of $\psi_t$ in $\mathbb{D}$. Moreover, it was shown in \cite{Dem-Hmi} that $\nu_t$ converges weakly to a probability measure $\nu_{\infty}$ whose support disconnects as soon as $\tau(P) \neq 1/2$ and it would be interesting to know whether this striking disconnectedness happens or not at a finite time.
In this paper, we use Lagrange inversion formula and derive the Taylor coefficients of the inverse of $\psi_t$, up to the elementary invertible transformations:
\begin{equation*}
z \in \mathbb{D} \mapsto s = \frac{1+z}{1-z}, \quad s \mapsto \sqrt{\kappa^2 + (1-\kappa^2)s^2},
\end{equation*}
where $\kappa := \tau(R) = 2\tau(P)-1$. These coefficients are displayed in corollary \ref{Cor32} of proposition \ref{prop31} below and are given by sign-alternating nested (finite) sums involving Laguerre polynomials and others in the variable $\kappa^2$. In particular, we recover when $\kappa = 0$ the moment sequence of $\eta_{2t}$ while more generally, we can single out from the obtained Taylor series a deformation of the Herglotz transform of $\eta_{2t}$ which is still bounded analytic in $\mathbb{D}$ but no longer extends continuously to the unit circle $\mathbb{T}$ unless $\kappa = 0$. As to the analytic extension of the whole Taylor series, it does not seem accessible (at least for the author) directly from the sums alluded to above due to oscillations. For that reason, we derive a contour integral representation over a circle centered at $\kappa$ for the first derivative of the Taylor series, which is so far valid in a neighborhood of $z=0$. To this end, we use the analytic continuation of the generating series for the Jacobi polynomial outside the interval $[-1,1]$ as well as a special generating series for Laguerre polynomials. The latter series generalizes the Herglotz transform of $\eta_{2t}$ and is expressed through it. Compared to the high dissymmetry arising when $\kappa \neq 0$, this integral representation is a major step toward the extension of the flow in the open unit disc which remains a challenging problem.
The paper is organized as follows. For sake of completeness, we briefly recall in the next section the relation of the spectral dynamics of $(J_t)_{t \geq 0}$ to those of $(U_t)_{t \geq 0}$ and in particular to the flow $(\psi_t)_{t \geq 0}$. In order to make the paper self-contained, the third section includes the various special functions we use in the remainder of the paper, as well as the computations leading to the Taylor coefficients. The fourth section is devoted to the derivation of the aforementioned integral representation and we close the paper by further developments in relation to the extension of the derived integral in $\mathbb{D}$.
\section{From the free Jacobi process to the flow}
Though the study of the spectral dynamics of
\begin{equation*}
J_t = PY_tPY_t^{\star}P
\end{equation*}
was direct when $\tau(P)=1/2$, their study for arbitrary ranks $\tau(P) \in (0,1)$ is rather based on the following binomial-type expansion:
\begin{align*}
\tau[(J_t)^n] = \frac{1}{2^{2n+1}}\binom{2n}{n} + \frac{\kappa}{2} + \frac{1}{2^{2n}}\sum_{k=1}^n \binom{2n}{n-k}\tau((U_t)^k).
\end{align*}
This expansion has the merit to orient our study to the spectral dynamics of $(U_t)$ which turn out to be easier than those of $J_t$ due to the unitarity of $U_t$. In this respect, let
\begin{equation*}
H_{\kappa, t}(z) := \int_{\mathbb{T}} \frac{w+z}{w-z}\nu_{\kappa, t}(dw) = 1+2\sum_{n \geq 1}\tau(U_t^n)z^n
\end{equation*}
be the Herglotz transform of the spectral distribution $\nu_{\kappa,t}$ of $U_t$. Then the key result proved in \cite{Dem-Hmi} states that there exists a flow $(t,z) \mapsto \psi_{\kappa,t}(z)$ defined in an open set of $\mathbb{R_+} \times [-1,1]$ and such that
\begin{align}\label{Dyn}
[H_{\kappa,\infty}(\psi_{\kappa,t}(z))]^2 - [H_{\kappa,\infty}(z)]^2 = [H_{\kappa, t}(\psi_{\kappa, t}(z))]^2 - [H_{\kappa,0}(z)]^2.
\end{align}
Here
\begin{equation*}
H_{\kappa,0}(z) = H_0(z) = \frac{1+z}{1-z}
\end{equation*}
is the Herglotz transform of $\nu_{\kappa,0} = \delta_1$ and $H_{\kappa,\infty}$ is that of the weak limit $\nu_{\kappa,\infty}$ of $\nu_{\kappa, t}$ (see section 2 in \cite{Dem-Hmi} for more details on $\nu_{\kappa,\infty}$).
Equation \eqref{Dyn} was so far used to determine the discrete spectrum of $J_t$ and $\psi_{\kappa, t}$ was expressed as follows: define\footnote{The principal branch of the square root is taken.}
\begin{equation*}
\alpha: z \mapsto \frac{1-\sqrt{1-z}}{1+\sqrt{1-z}} = \frac{z}{(1+\sqrt{1-z})^2}.
\end{equation*}
This map extends analytically to $z \in \mathbb{C} \setminus [1,\infty[$ and is one-to-one from this cut plane onto $\mathbb{D}$ whose inverse is
\begin{equation*}
\alpha^{-1}(z) = \frac{4z}{(1+z)^2}.
\end{equation*}
Recall also from \cite{Biane1} (p.266-269) that the map
\begin{equation*}
\xi_{2t}: z \mapsto \frac{z-1}{z+1}e^{tz}
\end{equation*}
is invertible in some Jordan domain onto $\mathbb{D}$ and that its compositional inverse is the Herglotz transform of $\eta_{2t}$:
\begin{equation*}
K_{{2t}}(z) := \int_{\mathbb{T}} \frac{w+z}{w-z}\eta_{2t}(dw) = 1+2\sum_{n \geq 1}\tau(Y_t^n)z^n.
\end{equation*}
If
\begin{equation*}
s := \frac{1+z}{1-z}, \, z \in \mathbb{D}, \quad a(s) := \sqrt{\kappa^2 + (1-\kappa^2)s^2},
\end{equation*}
then (\cite{Dem-Hmi}, p.283)
\begin{equation*}
\psi_{\kappa,t}(z) = \alpha\left(\frac{a^2}{a^2-\kappa^2}\alpha^{-1}[\xi_{2t}(a(y))]\right).
\end{equation*}
This is a locally invertible map near $z=0$ so that \eqref{Dyn} is equivalent to
\begin{align*}
[H_{\kappa, t}(z)]^2 - [H_{\kappa,\infty}(z)]^2 = [H_{\kappa,\infty}(\psi_{\kappa,t}^{-1}(z))]^2 + [H_{\kappa,0}(\psi_{\kappa,t}^{-1}(z))]^2
\end{align*}
near $z=0$. Since $z \mapsto s, s \mapsto a(s)$ and $\alpha$ are invertible transformations the inverting $\psi_{\kappa,t}$ around $z=0$ amounts to the inversion of the map
\begin{equation*}
a \mapsto \frac{a^2}{a^2-\kappa^2}\alpha^{-1}[\xi_{2t}(a)]
\end{equation*}
near $a=1$. This is the main task we achieve in the next section.
\section{Local inverse of the flow: Lagrange inversion formula}
\subsection{Special functions}
As claimed in the introduction, we list below the special functions occurring in our subsequent computations (see \cite{Erd}, \cite{Man-Sri}, \cite{Rainville} for further details). We start with the Gamma function
\begin{equation*}
\Gamma(x) = \int_0^{\infty} e^{-u}u^{x-1} du, \quad x > 0,
\end{equation*}
and the Pochhammer symbol
\begin{equation*}
(a)_k = (a+k-1)\dots(a+1)a, \quad a \in \mathbb{R}, \, k \in \mathbb{N},
\end{equation*}
with the convention $(0)_k = \delta_{k0}$. The latter may be expressed as
\begin{equation*}
(a)_k = \frac{\Gamma(a+k)}{\Gamma(a)}
\end{equation*}
when $a > 0$, while
\begin{equation}\label{I1}
\frac{(-n)_k}{k!} = (-1)^k \binom{n}{k}
\end{equation}
if $k \leq n$ and vanishes otherwise.
Next comes the generalized hypergeometric function defined by the series
\begin{equation*}
{}_pF_q((a_i, 1 \leq i \leq p), (b_j, 1 \leq j \leq q); z) = \sum_{m \geq 0}\frac{\prod_{i=1}^p(a_i)_m}{\prod_{j=1}^q(b_j)_m}\frac{z^m}{m!}
\end{equation*}
where an empty product equals one and the parameters $(a_i, 1 \leq i \leq p)$ are reals while $(b_j, 1 \leq j \leq q) \in \mathbb{R} \setminus -\mathbb{N}$.
With regard to \eqref{I1}, this series terminates when at least $a_i = -n \in - \mathbb{N}$ for some $1 \leq i \leq p$, therefore reduces in this case to a polynomial of degree $n$. In particular, the Charlier polynomials are defined by
\begin{equation*}
C_n(x,a) := {}_2F_0\left(-n, -x; -\frac{1}{a}\right), \quad a \in \mathbb{R} \setminus \{0\}, x \in \mathbb{R}.
\end{equation*}
When $x \in \mathbb{Z}$ is an integer, a generating function of these polynomials is given by
\begin{equation}\label{GFC}
\sum_{n \geq 0}C_n(x,a)\frac{(au)^n}{n!} = e^{au}\left(1-u\right)^x, \quad |u| < 1.
\end{equation}
Moreover, the $n$-th Laguerre polynomial with index $\alpha \in \mathbb{R}$ defined by
\begin{equation}\label{DefL}
L_n^{(\alpha)}(z) := \frac{1}{n!}\sum_{j=0}^n\frac{(-n)_j}{j!}(\alpha+j+1)_{n-j}z^j,
\end{equation}
is related to the $n$-th Charlier polynomial via:
\begin{equation}\label{CL}
\frac{(-a)^n}{n!}C_n(x,a) = L_n^{(x-n)}(a).
\end{equation}
When $p=2, q=1$, the Jacobi polynomial $P_n^{a,b}$ of parameters $a,b > -1$ is represented as
\begin{equation}\label{Jacobi}
P_n^{a,b}(x) := \frac{(a+1)_n}{n!}{}_2F_1\left(-n, n+a+b+1, a+1, \frac{1-x}{2}\right).
\end{equation}
\subsection{Inversion}
Let $t > 0, \kappa \in (-1,1)$ be fixed. The aim of this section is to derive the Taylor coefficients of the inverse of the map $\phi_{\kappa,t}$ defined by
\begin{equation*}
\phi_{\kappa,t}(z) = \frac{z^2}{z^2-\kappa^2} \alpha^{-1}(\xi_{2t}(z))
\end{equation*}
in a neighborhood of $z=1$. Of course, it is readily checked that $\partial_z\phi_{t, \kappa}(1) \neq 0$ so that $\phi_{t,\kappa}$ is locally invertible there. According to Lagrange inversion formula (see \cite{Man-Sri}, p.354), the Taylor coefficients of its inverse are given by
\begin{equation*}
a_n(\kappa, t) := \frac{1}{n!}\partial_z^{n-1}\left[\frac{z-1}{\phi_{\kappa,t}(z)}\right]^n|_{z=1}, \quad n \geq 1.
\end{equation*}
The issue of our computations is recorded in the proposition below:
\begin{prop}\label{prop31}
There exists a set of polynomials $(P_n^{(m)})_{n \geq 1}$ depending on an integer parameter $m \geq 0$ such that
\begin{align*}
a_n(\kappa, t) = \frac{2}{2^{2n}n}\sum_{k=1}^{n} \binom{2n}{n-k}e^{-kt} \left\{\sum_{m= 0}^{k-1}L_{k-m-1}^{(m+1)}(2kt)\,2^{m}P_n^{(m)}(\kappa^2)\right\}.
\end{align*}
\end{prop}
\begin{proof}
Set $\epsilon:= \kappa^2$, then we need to expand
\begin{equation}\label{Lagr}
(z-1)^n \left(1-\frac{\epsilon}{z^2}\right)^n \frac{(1+\xi_t(z))^{2n}}{4^n\xi_t^n(z)}
\end{equation}
around $z=1$. To proceed, we start with
\begin{align}
\left(1-\frac{\epsilon}{z^2}\right)^n &= \sum_{k=0}^n\binom{n}{k}(-\epsilon)^{k}\frac{1}{(1+(z-1))^{2k}} \nonumber
\\& = \sum_{k=0}^n\binom{n}{k}(-\epsilon)^{k}\sum_{m \geq 0}\frac{(2k)_m}{m!}(1-z)^m \nonumber
\\& := \sum_{m \geq 0}(z-1)^mP_n^{(m)}(\epsilon) \label{Poly}
\end{align}
where we set
\begin{equation*}
P_n^{(m)}(\epsilon) := \frac{(-1)^m}{m!}\sum_{k=0}^n\binom{n}{k}(-\epsilon)^k(2k)_m.
\end{equation*}
Next, we expand
\begin{align*}
(z-1)^n\frac{(1+\xi_t(z))^{2n}}{\xi_t^n(z)} &= (z-1)^n\sum_{k = -n}^n\binom{2n}{n+k}\xi_t^k
\\& = \binom{2n}{n}(z-1)^n + \sum_{k = 1}^n\binom{2n}{n+k}\left\{\frac{(z-1)^{n+k}}{(1+z)^k}e^{ktz} + (z-1)^{n-k}(1+z)^ke^{-ktz}\right\}
\\& = \binom{2n}{n}(z-1)^n + \sum_{k \in [-n..n]\setminus \{0\}}\binom{2n}{n+k}\frac{(z-1)^{n+k}}{(1+z)^k}e^{ktz}
\end{align*}
and use \eqref{GFC} together with \eqref{CL} to derive
\begin{align*}
\frac{(z-1)^{n+k}}{(1+z)^k}e^{ktz} & = \frac{e^{kt}}{2^k} (z-1)^{n+k}\sum_{m \geq 0}C_m(-k,-2kt)\frac{(kt(z-1))^m}{m!}
\\& = e^{kt} \sum_{m \geq 0}L_{m}^{(-k-m)}(-2kt)\frac{(z-1)^{m+n+k}}{2^{m+k}}.
\end{align*}
As a result
\begin{align*}
(z-1)^n\frac{(1+\xi_t(z))^{2n}}{\xi_t^n(z)} &= \binom{2n}{n}(z-1)^n + \sum_{k \in [-n..n]\setminus \{0\}} \binom{2n}{n+k}e^{kt} \sum_{m \geq 0}L_{m}^{(-k-m)}(-2kt)\frac{(z-1)^{m+n+k}}{2^{m+k}}.
\end{align*}
From \eqref{I1} and \eqref{DefL}, it is clear that $L_m^{(-m)}(0) = 0$ for all $m \geq 1$ while $L_0^{(0)}(z) = 1$. Hence
\begin{align*}
\frac{(z-1)^n}{[\alpha^{-1}(\xi_t(z))]^n} &= (z-1)^n\frac{(1+\xi_t(z))^{2n}}{4^n\xi_t^n(z)} = \sum_{k = -n}^n \binom{2n}{n+k}e^{kt} \sum_{m \geq 0}L_{m}^{(-k-m)}(-2kt)\frac{(z-1)^{m+n+k}}{2^{2n+m+k}}
\\& = \sum_{k = 0}^{2n} \binom{2n}{k}e^{(k-n)t}\sum_{m \geq 0} L_{m}^{(n-k-m)}(2(n-k)t)\frac{(z-1)^{m+k}}{2^{n+m+k}}
\\& = \sum_{k = 0}^{2n} \binom{2n}{k}e^{(k-n)t}\sum_{m \geq k} L_{m-k}^{(n-m)}(2(n-k)t)\frac{(z-1)^{m}}{2^{n+m}}
\\ & = \sum_{m \geq 0} \left\{\sum_{k = 0}^{m \wedge 2n} \binom{2n}{k}e^{(k-n)t}L_{m-k}^{(n-m)}(2(n-k)t)\right\}\frac{(z-1)^{m}}{2^{n+m}}.
\end{align*}
Keeping in mind \eqref{Lagr} and \eqref{Poly}, we end up with
\begin{align*}
a_n(\kappa, t) & = \frac{1}{n}\sum_{m=0}^{n-1}\frac{1}{2^{n+m}}P_n^{(n-1-m)}(\epsilon)\left\{\sum_{k = 0}^{2n \wedge m} \binom{2n}{k}e^{(k-n)t} L_{m-k}^{(n-m)}(2(n-k)t)\right\}
\\& = \frac{1}{n}\sum_{m=0}^{n-1}\frac{1}{2^{n+m}}P_n^{(n-1-m)}(\epsilon)\left\{\sum_{k = 0}^{m} \binom{2n}{k}e^{(k-n)t} L_{m-k}^{(n-m)}(2(n-k)t)\right\}
\\& = \frac{2}{2^{2n}n}\sum_{k=0}^{n-1} \binom{2n}{k}e^{(k-n)t} \left\{\sum_{m= k}^{n-1}L_{m-k}^{(n-m)}(2(n-k)t)\,2^{n-1-m}P_n^{(n-1-m)}(\epsilon)\right\}
\\& = \frac{2}{2^{2n}n}\sum_{k=1}^{n} \binom{2n}{n-k}e^{-kt} \left\{\sum_{m= n-k}^{n-1}L_{m-n+k}^{(n-m)}(2kt)\,2^{n-1-m}P_n^{(n-1-m)}(\epsilon)\right\}
\\& = \frac{2}{2^{2n}n}\sum_{k=1}^{n} \binom{2n}{n-k}e^{-kt} \left\{\sum_{m= 0}^{k-1}L_{k-m-1}^{(m+1)}(2kt)\,2^{m}P_n^{(m)}(\epsilon)\right\}.
\end{align*}
\end{proof}
\begin{cor}\label{Cor32}
Set $\Phi_{\kappa, t} := \alpha \circ \phi_{\kappa,t}$. Then $\Phi_{\kappa, t}$ is invertible in a neighborhood of $z=1$ and its inverse is given near the origin by
\begin{equation*}
\Phi_{\kappa,t}^{-1}(z) = 1+ \sum_{n \geq 1}\frac{(-1)^n}{n}\left\{\sum_{k=1}^n(-1)^{k} \frac{2n}{n+k}\binom{n+k}{n-k} b_k(\kappa,t)\right\} z^n,
\end{equation*}
where $b_k(\kappa,t) := k 2^{2k}a_k(\kappa,t), k \geq 1$.
\end{cor}
\begin{proof}
Since $\alpha$ is invertible in $\mathbb{C} \setminus [1,\infty[$ with $\alpha(0) = 0$, then
\begin{equation*}
\Phi_{\kappa,t}^{-1}(z) = 1+\sum_{n \geq 1}b_n(\kappa,t)\frac{[\alpha^{-1}(z)]^n}{n2^{2n}}
\end{equation*}
near $z=0$. Differentiating term-wise with respect to $z$ and using the identity
\begin{equation*}
\partial_z\alpha^{-1}(z) = \frac{1-z}{1+z}\frac{\alpha^{-1}(z)}{z},
\end{equation*}
we get
\begin{equation*}
\partial_z\Phi_{\kappa,t}^{-1}(z) = \frac{1-z}{z(1+z)}\sum_{n \geq 1}b_n(\kappa,t)\frac{[\alpha^{-1}(z)]^n}{2^{2n}}.
\end{equation*}
Now recall the following fact (see \cite{Man-Sri}, p.357): if $(c_n)_{n \geq 0}, (b_n)_{n \geq 0}$ are two sequences of real numbers related by
\begin{equation}\label{Conv}
b_n = \sum_{k=0}^n\binom{2n}{n-k}c_k,
\end{equation}
then
\begin{equation*}
\sum_{n \geq 0}b_n\frac{z^n}{4^n} = \frac{1+\alpha(z)}{1-\alpha(z)} \sum_{n \geq 0}c_n[\alpha(z)]^n
\end{equation*}
whenever both series converge. Equivalently, the relation \eqref{Conv} is invertible with inverse given by (see \cite{Rio}, p.68, Table 2.5, (2)),
\begin{align}\label{InvRel}
c_0 = b_0, \quad c_n &= \sum_{k=0}^n(-1)^{k+n}\left[\binom{n+k}{n-k} + \binom{n+k-1}{n-k-1}\right] b_k = \sum_{k=0}^n(-1)^{k+n} \frac{2n}{n+k}\binom{n+k}{n-k} b_k, \, n \geq 1,
\end{align}
and
\begin{equation*}
\sum_{n \geq 0}b_n\frac{[\alpha^{-1}(z)]^n}{4^n} = \frac{1+ z}{1- z} \sum_{n \geq 0}c_n z^n.
\end{equation*}
The corollary then follows from the substitutions
\begin{equation*}
b_0 = 0, \quad b_n = b_n(\kappa,t), \, n\geq 1.
\end{equation*}
\end{proof}
\begin{remark}
If $\kappa = 0$ then $P_n^{(m)}(0) = \delta_{m0}$ so that
\begin{equation*}
b_n(0, t) = 2\sum_{k=1}^{n} \binom{2n}{n-k}e^{-kt}L_{k-1}^{(1)}(2kt).
\end{equation*}
In this case, the inverse of $\Phi_{0,t}$ reduces to
\begin{equation*}
\Phi_{0,t}^{-1}(z) = 1+\sum_{n \geq 1}b_n(0,t)\frac{[\alpha^{-1}(z)]^n}{n2^{2n}} = 1+2\sum_{n \geq 1} \frac{1}{n}e^{-nt}L_{n-1}^{(1)}(2nt)z^{n}
\end{equation*}
which is nothing else but the Herglotz transform $K_{2t}$ of $\eta_{2t}$ (\cite{Biane1}, p.269).
\end{remark}
\begin{remark}
For general $\epsilon \in [0,1), P_n^{(0)} = (1-\epsilon)^n$ so that the term corresponding to $m=0$ in $a_n(\kappa, t)$ is
\begin{equation*}
2(1-\epsilon)^n \sum_{k=1}^n \binom{2n}{n-k} e^{-kt}L_{k-1}^{(1)}(2kt) = (1-\epsilon)^nb_n(0, t).
\end{equation*}
Multiplying by $[\alpha^{-1}(z)]^n$ and summing over $n \geq 1$, the preceding remark shows that
\begin{equation*}
1+2\sum_{n \geq 1}\frac{[(1-\epsilon)\alpha^{-1}(z)]^n}{n 2^{2n}}b_n(0,t)= K_{2t}\left(\alpha[(1-\epsilon)\alpha^{-1}(z)]\right).
\end{equation*}
Since $K_{2t}$ is analytic in $\mathbb{D}$ and since $\alpha$ maps $\mathbb{C} \setminus [1,\infty[$ onto $\mathbb{D}$, then the map
\begin{equation*}
V_{\kappa, 2t}: z \mapsto K_{2t}(\alpha[(1-\epsilon)\alpha^{-1}(z)])
\end{equation*}
extends analytically to $\mathbb{D}$ with values in the right half-plane $\{\Re(z) > 0\}$. It follows that there exists a probability distribution $\eta_{\kappa,2t}$ on $\mathbb{T}$ such that
\begin{equation*}
V_{\kappa, 2t} = \int_{\mathbb{T}}\frac{w+z}{w-z}\eta_{\kappa,2t}(dw),
\end{equation*}
and $\eta_{0,2t} = \eta_{2t}$. However, unless $\epsilon = 0$, $V_{\kappa, 2t}$ is no longer continuous in the closed unit disc since the map
\begin{equation*}
z \mapsto \alpha[(1-\epsilon)\alpha^{-1}(z)]
\end{equation*}
is not so in $\mathbb{C}$ due to the presence of the square root function in the definition of $\alpha$. Nonetheless, it is still a bounded holomorphic function in $\mathbb{D}$ since $K_{2t}$ is continuous in $\overline{\mathbb{D}}$ (\cite{Biane1}, Lemma 12).
\end{remark}
\section{An Integral representation}
For any $n \geq 1$, set
\begin{equation}\label{FS}
S_n(\kappa,t) := \sum_{k=1}^n(-1)^{k+n} \frac{2n}{n+k}\binom{n+k}{n-k} b_k(\kappa,t),
\end{equation}
where we recall
\begin{equation*}
b_k(\kappa, t) = 2\sum_{j=1}^{k} \binom{2k}{k-j}e^{-jt} \left\{\sum_{m= 1}^{j-1}L_{j-m-1}^{(m+1)}(2jt)\,2^{m}P_k^{(m)}(\epsilon)\right\}, \quad k \geq 1.
\end{equation*}
For small $|z|$, consider the Taylor series
\begin{equation*}
M_{\kappa,t}(z) := \sum_{n \geq 2} S_n(\kappa,t) z^n = z\partial_z \Phi_{\kappa,t}^{-1}(z).
\end{equation*}
A major part of this section is devoted to the derivation of the following integral representation:
\begin{prop}
There exists a circle $\gamma_{\kappa}$ centered at $w=\kappa$ and a neighborhood of $z=0$ where
\begin{align*}
M_{\kappa,t}(z) &= (1-z) \frac{\kappa}{2i\pi}\int_{\gamma_{\kappa}} \frac{[(K_{2t}(y))^2-1]}{[t(K_{2t}(y))^2 + (2-t)][wK_{2t}(y) - \kappa]}\frac{dw}{wR(z,w)}.
\end{align*}
Here
\begin{equation*}
R(z,w) := \sqrt{(1-z)^2 + 4w^2z},
\end{equation*}
and
\begin{equation*}
y = y(z,w) := \frac{4z(1-w^2)}{(1+z+R(z,w))^2}.
\end{equation*}
\end{prop}
\begin{proof}
It consists of four steps corresponding to summation over the indices $\{k,n,j,m\}$ respectively. The interchange of the summation orders is readily justified by the (uniform) estimates given below for the generating series occurring in the proof. In the first step, we make use of the following lemma:
\begin{lem}
For any $m \geq 0, k \geq 1$,
\begin{equation}\label{ResInt}
(-1)^mP_k^{(m)}(\epsilon) = \frac{\kappa}{2i\pi}\int_{\gamma_{\kappa}} \frac{w^{m-1}(1-w^2)^{k}}{(w-\kappa)^{m+1}}dw
\end{equation}
where $\gamma_{\kappa}$ is a small circle centered at $w = \kappa$.
\begin{proof}
If $m \geq 1$ then $(0)_m = 0$ whence
\begin{align*}
(-1)^mP_k^{(m)}(\epsilon) &= \frac{1}{m!}\sum_{l=1}^k\binom{k}{l}(-\epsilon)^l(2l)_m
\\& = \frac{1}{m!} \sum_{l=1}^{k}\binom{k}{l}(-1)^l \kappa^{2l}\frac{(2l+m-1)!}{(2l-1)!}
\\& = \frac{\kappa}{m!} \partial_{w}^{m}\left\{\sum_{l=1}^{k}\binom{k}{l}(-1)^l(w)^{2l+m-1}\right\}_{|w=\kappa}
\\& = \frac{\kappa}{m!} \partial_{w}^{m}[w^{m-1}(1-w^2)^{k}]_{|w=\kappa}.
\end{align*}
The lemma follows from the Cauchy integral formula and from $P_k^{(0)}(\epsilon) = (1-\epsilon)^k$.
\end{proof}
\end{lem}
Now consider the sum over $k$:
\begin{align*}
S(n,j) := \sum_{k = j}^n (-1)^{k+n} \frac{2n}{n+k}\binom{n+k}{n-k} \binom{2k}{k-j} (1-w^2)^k, \quad 1 \leq j \leq n.
\end{align*}
Writing
\begin{equation*}
\frac{2n}{n+k}\binom{n+k}{n-k} = \binom{n+k}{n-k} + \binom{n+k-1}{n-k-1}
\end{equation*}
then $S(n,j) = f(n,j) - f(n-1,j)$ where
\begin{align*}
f(n,j) := (-1)^n\sum_{k = j}^n \binom{n+k}{n-k} \binom{2k}{k-j} (w^2-1)^k
\end{align*}
with the convention that an empty sum is zero. Since
\begin{equation*}
\binom{n+k}{n-k} \binom{2k}{k-j} = \frac{(n+k)!}{(n-k)!(k+j)!(k-j)!},
\end{equation*}
then the index change $k \rightarrow n-k$ yields
\begin{align*}
f_1(n,j) &= \frac{(-1)^{n-j}(1-w^2)^j}{(n-j)!}\sum_{k = 0}^{n-j} \frac{(n-j)!}{(n-j-k)!}\frac{(n+k+j)!}{(k+2j)!} \frac{(w^2-1)^{k}}{k!}
\\& = \frac{(-1)^{n-j}(1-w^2)^j(n+j)!}{(n-j)!(2j)!}\sum_{k = 0}^{n-j} (j-n)_k\frac{(n+j+1)_k}{(2j+1)_k} \frac{(1-w^2)^{k}}{k!}
\\& = \frac{(-1)^{n-j}(1-w^2)^j(2j+1)_{n-j}}{(n-j)!}\sum_{k = 0}^{n-j} (j-n)_k\frac{(n+j+1)_k}{(2j+1)_k} \frac{(1-w^2)^{k}}{k!}
\\& = (-1)^{n-j} (1-w^2)^jP_{n-j}^{2j,0}(2w^2-1)
\end{align*}
where the last equality follows from \eqref{Jacobi}. Besides, the symmetry relation $P_n^{a,b}(z) = (-1)^nP_n^{b,a}(-z)$ entails
\begin{align*}
S(n,j) &= (1-w^2)^j\left\{(-1)^{n-j}P_{n-j}^{2j,0}(2w^2-1) - (-1)^{n-j-1}P_{n-1-j}^{2j,0}(2w^2-1)\right\}
\\& = (1-w^2)^j\left\{P_{n-j}^{0,2j}(1-2w^2) - P_{n-1-j}^{0,2j}(1-2w^2)\right\}.
\end{align*}
Combining \eqref{FS} and the previous Lemma, we get the following representation
\begin{align}\label{Repre}
S_n(\kappa,t) &= \frac{\kappa}{i\pi}\int_{\gamma_{\kappa}}\sum_{j=1}^n[(1-w^2)e^{-t}]^j \sum_{m= 0}^{j-1}L_{j-m-1}^{(m+1)}(2jt)
\left\{P_{n-j}^{0,2j}(1-2w^2) - P_{n-1-j}^{0,2j}(1-2w^2)\right\}\frac{(-2)^mw^{m-1}}{(w-\kappa)^{m+1}}dw.
\end{align}
In the second step, we fix $j \geq m+1 \geq 1$ and consider the series of Jacobi polynomials:
\begin{equation*}
\sum_{n \geq j}P_{n-j}^{0,2j}(1-2w^2)z^n = z^j \sum_{n \geq 0}P_n^{0,2j}(1-2w^2)z^n, \quad w \in \gamma_{\kappa}.
\end{equation*}
According to \cite{EKS} (see the discussion p.2), for any fixed $z \in \mathbb{D}$, this series converges uniformly in $w$ on closed subsets of the ellipse $E_{|z|}$ of foci $\{\pm1\}$ and semi-axes
\begin{equation*}
\frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{1}{|z|} \pm |z|\right).
\end{equation*}
Since both semi-axes stretches as $|z|$ becomes small, then given an ellipse $E_r, 0 < r < 1$, the series of Jacobi polynomials above converges absolutely in the disc $\{|z| < r\}$ uniformly on the closure of the domain $D_r$ enclosed by $E_r$. Thus, we fix $r$ and choose $\gamma_{\kappa}$ such that its image under the map $w \mapsto 1-2w^2$ lies in $\overline{D_r}$. Doing so proves the analyticity of the series of Jacobi polynomials above in the variable $w \in E_r$ so that the following equality holds by analytic continuation (see \cite{Sze}, p.69 for real $1-2w^2$):
\begin{equation}\label{GenFunJac1}
z^j \sum_{n \geq 0}P_n^{0,2j}(1-2w^2)z^n = \frac{(4z)^j}{R(z,w)(1+z+R(z,w))^{2j}}, \quad w \in \gamma_{\kappa},
\end{equation}
provided
\begin{equation*}
R(z,w) = \sqrt{(1-z)^2+4w^2z}
\end{equation*}
does not vanish and is analytic in the variable $z$. This last condition holds true at least for small $|z|$ since
\begin{equation*}
|[(1-z)^2 +4w^2z] - 1| \leq |z|(|z| + \max_{\gamma_{\kappa}} |1-2w^2|).
\end{equation*}
Similarly,
\begin{equation}\label{GenFunJac2}
\sum_{n \geq j}P_{n-j-1}^{0,2j}(1-2w^2)z^n = z \frac{(4z)^j}{R(z,w)(1+z+R(z,w))^{2j}}, \quad w \in \gamma_{\kappa}.
\end{equation}
Next comes the third step where we fix the curve $\gamma_{\kappa}$ and $m \geq 1$, and work out the series
\begin{equation*}
\sum_{j \geq m+1}L_{j-m-1}^{(m+1)}(2jt) \frac{[4ze^{-t}(1-w^2)]^j}{(1+z+R(z,w))^{2j}}, \quad w \in \gamma_{\kappa}.
\end{equation*}
More precisely,
\begin{lem}
For any $m \geq 1$ and $|y| < 1$,
\begin{align}\label{Laguerre}
2^{m+1}\sum_{j \geq m+1}L_{j-m-1}^{(m+1)}(2jt)(e^{-t}y)^j = \frac{(K_{2t}(y))^2-1}{t(K_{2t}(y))^2 + (2-t)}\left[K_{2t}(y)-1\right]^{m}.
\end{align}
\end{lem}
\begin{proof}
The series in the LHS of \eqref{Laguerre} is an instance of equation 1.2 from \cite{Coh} where it is claimed without any detail that it converges in $\mathbb{D}$. This claim can be checked as follows:
the derivation rule (\cite{Sze})
\begin{equation*}
L_{j-m-1}^{(m+1)}(2jt) = \frac{1}{(2j)^m}\partial_t^m L_{j-1}^{(1)}(2jt)
\end{equation*}
together with the following integral representation (\cite{Gro-Mat}, p.561):
\begin{equation}\label{Int1}
L_{j-1}^{(1)}(2jt) = \frac{1}{2i\pi}\int_{C_0} \left(1+\frac{1}{h}\right)^{j}e^{-2jth} dh
\end{equation}
over a small closed curve $C_0$ around the origin lead to
\begin{equation}\label{Int2}
L_{j-m-1}^{(m+1)}(2jt) = \frac{(-1)^m}{2i\pi}\int_{C_0} h^m \left(1+\frac{1}{h}\right)^{j}e^{-2jth} dh.
\end{equation}
When $m=0$, the behavior of $L_{j-1}^{(1)}(2jt)$ as $j \rightarrow \infty$ was analyzed \cite{Gro-Mat} using the saddle point method (see p.561-562). For general $m \geq 1$, the integrand in \eqref{Int2} differs from the one in \eqref{Int1} by the factor $h^m$ which is everywhere analytic and is independent of $j$. According to the saddle point method, the behavior of $L_{j-m-1}^{(m+1)}(2jt)$ as $j \rightarrow \infty$ is the same as that of $L_{j-1}^{(1)}(2jt)$ up to multiplication by $m$-powers of the saddle points (one saddle point for $t \geq 2$ and two conjugate saddle points when $t < 2$). As a matter of fact, formulas (2.57) and (2.60) in \cite{Gro-Mat} show that the series displayed in \eqref{Laguerre} converges for $|y| < 1$.
Coming into the derivation of the RHS of \eqref{Laguerre}, we specialize equation (1.2) in \cite{Coh} to $b=0, v=m+1, x=2(m+1)t, a = 1/(m+1)$ in order to get:
\begin{align*}
\sum_{j \geq 0} L_{j}^{(m+1)}(2jt+2(m+1)t) (e^{-t}y)^{j+m+1} & = \frac{1}{(1-u)^2+2tu}\frac{(ye^{-t})^{m+1}}{(1-u)^{m}}e^{2(m+1)tu/(u-1)}.
\end{align*}
Here, $u = u_t(z,w) \in \mathbb{D}$ is determined by
\begin{equation*}
e^{-t}y= ue^{2tu/(1-u)} \quad \Leftrightarrow \quad y = ue^{t(1+u)/(1-u)}.
\end{equation*}
Equivalently,
\begin{equation*}
Z := \frac{u+1}{1-u}
\end{equation*}
satisfies $\xi_{2t}(Z) = y, \Re(Z) \geq 0$. But since $\xi_{2t}$ is a one-to-one map from the Jordan domain
\begin{equation*}
\Gamma_{2t} := \{\Re(Z) > 0, \xi_{2t}(Z) \in \mathbb{D}\}
\end{equation*}
onto $\mathbb{D}$ whose composition inverse is $K_{2t}$ (\cite{Biane1}, Lemma 12), then $Z = K_{2t}(y)$ and in turn
\begin{equation*}
u = \frac{Z-1}{Z+1}
\end{equation*}
is uniquely determined in the open unit disc. Substituting
\begin{eqnarray*}
u & = & (ye^{-t})e^{2ut/(u-1)} \\
\frac{1}{1-u} &=& \frac{K_{2t}(y)+1}{2}
\end{eqnarray*}
proves the lemma.
\end{proof}
According to this lemma,
\begin{equation*}
2^{m+1}\sum_{j \geq m+1}L_{j-m-1}^{(m+1)}(2jt) \frac{[4ze^{-t}(1-w^2)]^j}{(1+z+R(z,w))^{2j}} = \frac{(K_{2t}(y))^2-1}{t(K_{2t}(y))^2 + (2-t)}\left[K_{2t}(y)-1\right]^m
\end{equation*}
provided that
\begin{equation*}
y = y(z,w) = \frac{4z(1-w^2)}{(1+z+R(z,w))^2}
\end{equation*}
lies in $\mathbb{D}$, which holds true for $|z|$ small enough.
Finally, $K_{2t}(y) - 1$ becomes small enough when $|z|$ does since $K_{2t}(0) = 1$. As a result
\begin{equation}\label{Geom}
\sum_{m \geq 0} \frac{w^{m-1}}{(w-\kappa)^{m+1}}\left[1-K_{2t}(y)\right]^m = \frac{1}{w(wK_{2t}(y) - \kappa)}
\end{equation}
in some disc centered at $z=0$. Gathering \eqref{Repre}, \eqref{GenFunJac1}, \eqref{GenFunJac2} and \eqref{Geom}, the proposition is proved.
\end{proof}
\begin{remark}
If $0 < t \leq 2$ then the map
\begin{equation*}
z \mapsto t(K_{2t}(y))^2 + (2-t)
\end{equation*}
does not vanish since $K_{2t}$, as a map from the closed unit disc into the right half-plane, takes values in $\sqrt{-1}\mathbb{R}$ only on the unit circle. Otherwise, the range $\Gamma_{2t}$ of $K_{2t}$ does not contain the real $\sqrt{(t-2)/t}$ (see \cite{Biane1}, section 4.2.3). Thus, for any $t > 0$ and any $z$ in the disc evoked in the previous proposition, the map
\begin{equation*}
w \mapsto \frac{1}{[t(K_{2t}(y))^2 + (2-t)]}
\end{equation*}
is holomorphic in the interior of $\gamma_{\kappa}$. This observation together with the splitting $\kappa = (\kappa - wK_{2t}(y)) + wK_{2t}(y)$ lead to
\end{remark}
\begin{cor}
With $\gamma_{\kappa}$ and $z$ as in the previous proposition,
\begin{align*}
M_{\kappa,t}(z) = (1-z) \frac{1}{2i\pi}\int_{\gamma_{\kappa}} \frac{K_{2t}(y)[(K_{2t}(y))^2-1]}{[t(K_{2t}(y))^2 + (2-t)][wK_{2t}(y) - \kappa]}\frac{dw}{R(z,w)}
\end{align*}
\end{cor}
The second integral representation has the merit to get rid of the singularity of the integrand at $w=0$. It also reduces to $z\partial_z K_{2t}(z) = z\partial_z \Phi_{0,t}^{-1}(z)$ when $\kappa = 0$. In fact,
\begin{align*}
M_{0,t}(z) &= (1-z) \frac{1}{2i\pi}\int_{\gamma_0} \frac{K_{2t}(y))^2-1}{[t(K_{2t}(y))^2 + (2-t)]}\frac{dw}{w R(z,w)}
\\& = \frac{(1-z)(K_{2t}(y(z,0))^2-1)}{[t(K_{2t}(y(z,0)))^2 + (2-t)]R(z,0)}.
\end{align*}
But $R(z,0) = 1-z$ and $y(z,0)= z$ hence
\begin{align*}
M_{0,t}(z) = \frac{(K_{2t}(z))^2-1)}{[t(K_{2t}(z))^2 + (2-t)]}
\end{align*}
which is the special instance $m=0$ of the RHS of \eqref{Laguerre}:
\begin{equation*}
\sum_{j \geq 1}L_{j-1}^{(1)}(2jt)z^j = z\partial_z K_{2t}(z).
\end{equation*}
\section{further developments}
So far, the integral representation derived for $M_{\kappa,t}$ is valid in a neighborhood of the origin. With an extra effort, we can prove that the only obstruction toward the analytic extension of $M_{\kappa,t}$ in $\mathbb{D}$ comes from the set of zeros
\begin{equation*}
wK_{2t}(y(z,w)) - \kappa, \quad \kappa \neq 0,
\end{equation*}
which may or not intersect $\gamma_{\kappa}$ as $z$ varies in $\mathbb{D}$. More precisely, $R(\cdot, w)$ and $y(\cdot, w)$ may be extended to $\mathbb{D}$ after suitably deforming the circle $\gamma_{\kappa}$. For the former, note that the polynomial
\begin{equation*}
z \mapsto (1-z)^2+ 4\kappa^2z
\end{equation*}
vanishes only on the unit circle and never takes a negative value. Therefore, the range of its restriction to any closed disc in $\mathbb{D}$ remains at a distance $\delta > 0$ from the half-line $]-\infty, 0]$. For those $z$, if
$\gamma_{\kappa}$ is chosen such that $w^2$ lies in the open disc centered at $\kappa^2$ at a distance $\delta_1 < \delta/4$ then the decomposition
\begin{equation*}
(1-z)^2+4w^2z = [(1-z)^2+4\kappa^2z] + 4\delta_1e^{i\theta}z
\end{equation*}
shows that $(1-z)^2+4w^2z$ does not take values in $]-\infty,0]$. As to the latter, we use a similar reasoning. More precisely, we readily see from
\begin{equation*}
y(z,w) = \frac{4z(1-w^2)}{(1+z+R(z,w))^2} = \frac{1+z - R(z,w)}{1+z + R(z,w)},
\end{equation*}
that $|y(z,w)| < 1$ if and only if
\begin{equation*}
\Re[(1+z) \overline{R(z,w)}] > 0,
\end{equation*}
that is the inner product of the vectors $(1+z)$ and $R(z,w)$ is positive. But
\begin{equation*}
R(z, w) = \sqrt{(1+z)^2 - 4(1-w^2)z},
\end{equation*}
and $2\arg(1+z) < \arg(z), |z| < 1$ show that if $w = \kappa \in (-1,1)\setminus \{0\}$ then
\begin{equation*}
\min\{\arg(1-z), \arg(1+z)\} < \arg R(z,\kappa) < \max\{\arg(1-z), \arg(1+z)\}.
\end{equation*}
Since $\Re[(1+z)(1-\overline{z})] = 1-|z|^2 > 0$ then $\Re[(1+z) \overline{R(z,\kappa)}] > 0$ and still holds on a small curve around $\kappa$.
|
\section{Introduction and statement of the main results}
The paper consists of three results: Theorem \ref{THM04}, Theorem \ref{THM03} and Theorem \ref{THM05}. Our first result answer positively to a conjecture due to {A. J. Di Scala}, { A. Loi}, {H. Hishi} (see \cite[Conjecture 1]{dlh}), namely:
\begin{thm}\label{THM04}
Let $(M, \omega)$ be a simply-connected homogeneous K\"{a}hler\ manifold such that its associated K\"{a}hler\ form $\omega$ is integral.
Then there exists a constant $\mu_0 > 0$ such that $\mu_0 \, \omega$ is projectively induced.
\end{thm}
Before stating our second result (Theorem \ref{THM03}), we recall the definitions of a Berezin quantization and diastasis function.
Let $(M, \omega)$ be a symplectic manifold and let $\lbrace \cdot, \cdot \rbrace$ be the associated Poisson bracket.
A {\em Berezin quantization} on $M$ is given by a family of associative algebras $\mathcal A_\hbar \subset \mathbb{C}^{\infty}(M)$ such that
\begin{itemize}
\item $\hbar \in E \subset \mathbb{R}^+$ and $\inf E =0$
\item exists a subalgebra ${\mathcal A}\subset (\oplus_{h \in E} \mathcal A_h,*)$, such that for an arbitrary element
$f=f(\hbar)\in {\mathcal A}$, where $f(\hbar)\in {\mathcal A}_\hbar$, there exists a limit $\lim_{\hbar\rightarrow 0} f(\hbar)=\varphi (f)\in C^{\infty}(M)$,
\item hold the following correspondence principle: for $f, g \in {\mathcal A}$
$$\varphi (f*g)=\varphi (f)\varphi (g),\ \ \ \varphi\left(\hbar^{-1}(f*g-g*f)\right)=i\lbrace\varphi(f), \varphi (g)\rbrace,$$
\item for any pair of points $x_1,x_2 \in \Omega$ there exists $f \in \mathcal A $ such that $\varphi (f) (x_1) \neq \varphi(f)(x_2)$
\end{itemize}
Let $(M,\omega)$ be a real analytic K\"{a}hler\ manifold. Let $U \subset M$ be a neighborhood of a point $p \in M$ and let $\psi: U \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ be a K\"{a}hler\ potential for $\omega$. The potential $\psi$ can be analytically extended to a sesquilinear function $ \psi(p, \ov q)$, defined in a neighborhood of the diagonal of $U \times U$, such that $ \psi(q, \ov q)=\psi(q)$. Assume (by shrinking $U$) that the analytic extension $ \psi$ is defined on $U \times U$. The {\it Calabi's diastasis function} $\mathcal{D}:U \times U \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ is given by:
\[
\mathcal{D}(p,q)=\psi(p,\ov p)+\psi(q,\ov q)+\psi(p,\ov q)+\psi(q,\ov p).
\]
Denoted by $\mathcal{D}_p(q):=\mathcal{D}(p,q)$ the diastasis centered in a point $p$, one can see that $\mathcal{D}_p:U \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ is a K\"{a}hler\ potential around $p$.
Our second result extends to any homogeneous K\"{a}hler\ manifolds the results obtained by the authors \cite{LM03} for homogeneous bounded domains.
\begin{thm}\label{THM03}
Let $(M, \omega)$ be a homogeneous K\"{a}hler\ manifold. Then the following are equivalent:
\begin{enumerate}[(a)]
\item $M$ is contractible.
\item $(M, \omega)$ admits a global K\"{a}hler\ potential.
\item $(M, \omega)$ admits a global diastasis $\mathcal{D}: M \times M \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$.
\item $(M, \omega)$ admits a Berezin quantization.
\end{enumerate}
\end{thm}
Also to state the third result (Theorem \ref{THM05}) we need some definitions.
The diastatic entropy has been defined by the second author in \cite{M04} (see also \cite{mossa1}) following the ideas developed in \cite{LM01} and \cite{mossa2}.
Assume that $\omega$ admits a globally defined diastasis function $\mathcal{D}_p:M \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ (centered at $p$). The \emph{diastatic entropy} at $p$ is defined as
\begin{equation}\label{def dent}
\operatorname{Ent}\left( M, \, \omega \right)\left( p\right)= \min \left\{ c >0 \ | \, \int_M e^{-c \, \mathcal{D}_p }\, \frac{\omega^n}{n!}<\infty \right\} .
\end{equation}
The definition does not depend on the point $p$ chosen (see \cite[Proposition 2.2]{mossa1}).
Assume that $M$ is simply-connected and assume that there exists a line bundle $L \rightarrow M$ such that $c_1(L)=[\omega]$ (i.e. $\omega$ is integral). Let $h$ be an Hermitian metric on $L$ such that $\operatorname{Ric}(h)=\omega$ and consider the Hilbert space of global holomorphic sections of $L^{\lambda}=\otimes^\lambda L$ given by
\begin{equation}\label{hilbertspaceh}
\mathcal{H}_{\lambda,h}=\left\{ s\in\operatorname{Hol}(L) \ |\ \| s \|^2 = \int_M h^{\lambda}(s,s)\, \frac{\omega^n}{n!}<\infty\right\},
\end{equation}
with the scalar product induced by $\| \cdot \|$.
Let $\{s_j\}_{j=0,\dots,N}$, $N \leq \infty$, be an orthonormal basis for $\mathcal{H}_{\lambda, h}$. The \emph{$\varepsilon$-function} is given by
\begin{equation}\label{epl}
\varepsilon_{\lambda}(x)=\sum_{j=0}^Nh^\lambda(s_j(x),s_j(x)).
\end{equation}
This definition depends only on the K\"{a}hler\ form $\omega$. Indeed since $M$ is simply-connected, there exists (up to isomorphism) a unique $L \rightarrow M$ such that $c_1(L)=[\omega]$, and
it is easy to see that the definition does not depend on the orthonormal basis chosen or on the Hermitian metric $h$ (see e.g \cite{LM03} or \cite{M01,LM02} for details).
Under the assumption that $\varepsilon_{\lambda}$ is a (strictly) positive function, one can consider the \emph{coherent states map} $f: M \rightarrow \mathbb{C} P^N$ defined by
\begin{equation}\label{eqcoherent}
f(x)=\left[s_0(x), \dots, s_j(x), \dots\right].
\end{equation}
The fundamental link between the coherent states map and the $\varepsilon$-function
is expressed by the following equation (see \cite{rawnsley} for a proof)
\begin{equation}\label{pullbackdie}
f^*\omega_{FS}=\lambda \omega + \frac{i}{2} \partial \ov\partial\, \varepsilon_\lambda ,
\end{equation}
where $\omega_{FS}$ is the Fubini--Study form on $\mathbb{C} P^N$.
\begin{defni}
We say that $\lambda\omega$ is a \emph{balanced metric} if and only if the $\varepsilon_\lambda$ is a \emph{positive constant}.
\end{defni}
We can now state our third and last result which extends to any homogeneous K\"{a}hler\ manifold, the result obtained by the second author \cite[Theorem 2]{M04}, about the link between \emph{diastatic entropy} and \emph{balanced condition} on homogeneous bounded domains.
\begin{thm}\label{THM05}
Let $(M,\omega)$ be a contractible homogeneous K\"{a}hler\ manifold. Then $\lambda \omega$ is balanced if and only if
\begin{equation}
\operatorname{Ent}(M,\omega)<\lambda.
\end{equation}
\end{thm}
\section{Proof the main results}
We start with the following two lemmata, which provide a necessary and sufficient condition on the non-triviality of the Hilbert space $\mathcal{H}_{\lambda, h}$.\begin{lem}[Rosemberg--Vergne \cite{rosenberg}]\label{lemrose}\footnote{The authors thanks Hishi Hideyuki for reporting this result.}
Let $(M, \omega)$ be a simply-connected homogeneous K\"{a}hler\ manifold with $\omega$ integral. Then there exists $\lambda_0>0$ such that
$\mathcal{H}_{\lambda, h}\neq \{0\}$ if and only if $\lambda > \lambda_0$ and $\lambda \omega$ is integral.
\end{lem}
\begin{lem} \label{lembal}
Let $(M, \omega)$ be a simply-connected homogeneous K\"{a}hler\ manifold. Then $\mathcal{H}_{\lambda,h} \neq \{0\}$ if and only if $\lambda \omega$ is a balanced metric.
\end{lem}
\proof Let $F \in \operatorname{Aut}(M)\cap\operatorname{Isom}(M,\omega)$ be an holomorphic isometry and let $\w F$ its lift to $L$ (which exists since $M$ is simply-connected). Note that, if $\lbrace s_0, \dots,s_N\rbrace$, $N\leq\infty$, is an orthonormal basis for $\mathcal{H}_{\lambda, h}$, then $\lbrace\w{ F}^{-1} \left( s_0\left(F\left(x\right) \right)\right),\dots , \w{ F}^{-1} \left( s_N\left(F\left(x\right) \right)\right)\rbrace$ is an orthonormal basis for $\mathcal{H}_{\lambda,\w{ F} ^*h}$.
Therefore
\begin{equation*}
\begin{split}
\epsilon_\lambda(x)
&=\sum_{j=0}^N \w {F}^* h^\lambda \left( \w {F}^{-1}(s_j(F(x))),\w {F}^{-1}(s_j(F(x)))\right) \\
&=\sum_{j=0}^N h^\lambda\left( s_j(F(x)), s_j(F(x)) \right)=\varepsilon_{\lambda}\left(F(x)\right).
\end{split}
\end{equation*}
Since $\operatorname{Aut}(M)\cap\operatorname{Isom}(M,\omega)$ acts transitively on $M$, $\varepsilon_{\lambda}$ is forced to be constant.
\endproof
\noindent
{\bf Proof of Theorem \ref{THM04}}\label{proofthm1}
By Lemma \ref{lemrose}
there exists $\lambda > \lambda_0$, such that the Hilbert space
$\mathcal{H}_{\lambda, h}\neq \{0\}$.
By Lemma \ref{lembal}, $\varepsilon_\lambda$ is a positive constant, so the coherent states map $f$ given by \eqref{eqcoherent} is well defined. Moreover, by \eqref{pullbackdie}, we have that $f^*\omega_{FS}=\lambda \omega$, i.e. $\lambda \omega$ is projectively induced for all $\lambda > \lambda_0$. The conclusion follows by setting $\mu_0 >\lambda_0$. \hspace*{\fill}$\Box$
\vskip 0.5cm
The main ingredients for the proof of Theorem \ref{THM03} are the following two lemmata.
The first one is the celebrated theorem of Dorfmeister and Nakajima which provides a positive answer to the so called \emph{Fundamental Conjecture} formulated by Vinberg and Gindikin. The second one is a reformulation due to Engli\v{s} of the Berezin quantization result in terms of the ${\varepsilon}$-function and Calabi's diastasis function.
\begin{lem}[Dorfmeister--Nakajima \cite{DN88}]\label{THMA}
A homogeneous K\"{a}hler\ manifold $(M, \omega)$ is the total space of a holomorphic
fiber bundle over a homogeneous bounded domain $\Omega$ in which the fiber ${\mathcal F} ={\mathcal E} \times {\mathcal C}$
is (with the
induced K\"ahler metric) is the K\"{a}hler\ product of a flat homogeneous K\"ahler manifold ${\mathcal E}$ and a
compact simply-connected homogeneous K\"ahler manifold ${\mathcal C}$.
\end{lem}
\begin{lem}[Engli\v{s} \cite{englis}]\label{thmberezin}
Let $\Omega\subset \mathbb{C}^n$ be a complex domain equipped with a real analytic K\"{a}hler\ form $\omega$.
Then, $(\Omega, \omega)$ admits a Berezin quantization if the following two conditions are satisfied:
\begin{enumerate}
\item
the function ${\varepsilon}_{\lambda}(x)$ is a positive constant (i.e. $\lambda \omega$ is balanced) for all sufficiently large $\lambda$;
\item
the function $e^{-\mathcal{D}(x, y)}$ is globally defined on $\Omega\times\Omega$, $e^{-\mathcal{D}(x, y)}\leq1$ and $e^{-\mathcal{D}(x, y)}=1$, if and only if $x=y$.
\end{enumerate}
\end{lem}
\noindent
{\bf Proof of Theorem \ref{THM03}}
\noindent
\emph{\bf (a) $\Rightarrow$ (b)}.
By Lemma \ref{THMA}, since a homogeneous bounded domain is contractible, $M$ is a {\em complex}
product $\Omega \times {\mathcal F}$, where ${\mathcal F}={\mathcal E}\times {\mathcal C}$ is (with the induced metric) a K\"{a}hler\ product of a flat K\"{a}hler\ manifold ${\mathcal E}$ and a compact simply-connected homogeneous K\"{a}hler\ manifold ${\mathcal C}$. On the other hand
${\mathcal E}$ is K\"{a}hler\ flat and therefore ${\mathcal E}=\mathbb{C}^k\times T$ where $T$ is a product of flat complex tori. Hence $M$ is a {complex}
product $\Omega \times \mathbb{C}^k\times T \times {\mathcal C}$. Since we assumed $M$ contractible, the compact factor $T \times {\mathcal C}$ has dimension zero and $M=\Omega \times \mathbb{C}^k$. It is well-know that $\Omega$ is biholomorphic to a Siegel domain (see, \cite{vinberg} for a proof), therefore $\Omega \times \mathbb{C}^k$ is pseudoconvex and a classical result of Hormander (see \cite{bulletin}) asserting that the equation $\ov\partial u = f$ with $f$ $\ov\partial$-closed form has a global solution on pseudoconvex domains, assures us the existence of a global potential $\psi$ for $\omega$ (see also \cite{mossa3, M04}, and the proof of Theorem 4 in \cite{dlh} for an explicit construction of the potential $\psi$).
\emph{\bf (b) $\Rightarrow$ (c).} Let $\psi: M \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ be a global K\"{a}hler\ potential for $(M, \omega)$. By Lemma \ref{THMA}, $M=\Omega \times \mathbb{C}^k\times T \times {\mathcal C}$. The compact factor $T \times {\mathcal C}$ is a K\"{a}hler\ submanifold of $M$, therefore the existence of a global K\"{a}hler\ potential on $M$ implies that $\dim(T \times {\mathcal C})=0$. So $M=\Omega\times \mathbb{C}^k$.
Consider the Hilbert space $\mathcal{H}_{\lambda, h}$ defined in \eqref{hilbertspaceh}.
Since $\Omega\times \mathbb{C}^k$ is contractible the line bundle $L \cong M \times \mathbb{C}$. So, the holomorphic section $s \in \mathcal{H}_{\lambda, h}$ can be viewed as a holomorphic function $s:M \rightarrow \mathbb{C}$. As Hermitian metric $h$ over $L$ we can take the one defined by $h(s,s)= e^{-\psi} |s|^2$. Hence $\mathcal{H}_{\lambda, h}$ can be identified with the weighted Hilbert space $\mathcal{H}_{\lambda\psi}$ (see \cite{LMZ03}) of square integrable holomorphic functions on $M=\Omega \times \mathbb{C}^k$, with weight $e^{-\lambda\psi}$, namely
\begin{equation}\label{hilbertspacePhi}
\mathcal{H}_{\lambda\psi}=\left\{ s\in\operatorname{Hol}(M) \ | \ \, \int_M e^{-\lambda\psi}|s|^2\frac{\omega^n}{n!}<\infty\right\}.
\end{equation}
Assume $\lambda > \lambda_0$ with $\lambda_0$ given by Lemma \ref{lemrose}, so that $\mathcal{H}_{\lambda\psi}\neq \{0\}$. Let $\{s_j\}$ be an orthonormal basis for $\mathcal{H}_{\lambda\psi}$, then the reproducing kernel is given by
$$K_{\lambda\psi}(z, \bar w)=\sum_{j=0}^\infty s_j(z) \ov{s_j(w)} .$$
Then, the ${\varepsilon}$-function (defined in \eqref{epl}) reads as:
\begin{equation}\label{epsilon}
\varepsilon_\lambda(z)=e^{-\lambda\psi(z)}K_{\lambda\psi}(z,\bar z).
\end{equation}
Let $ \psi \left( z,\ov w\right) $ be the analytic continuation of the K\"{a}hler\ potential $\psi$. By Lemma \ref{lembal} there exists a constant $C$ such that
\begin{equation}\label{epsilon1}
{\varepsilon}_{\lambda}\left( z,\, \ov w\right) =e^{-\lambda\psi\left( z,\, \ov w\right) }K_{{\lambda\psi}}\left( z,\, \ov w\right) =C>0.
\end{equation}
Hence $K_{{\lambda\psi}}\left( z,\, \ov w\right)$ never vanish. Therefore, for any fixed point $z_0$, the function
\begin{equation}\label{PSI00}
\Phi\left( z,\, \ov w\right)=\frac{K_{{\lambda\psi}}\left( z,\,\ov w\right) K_{{\lambda\psi}}\left( z_0,\,\ov z_0\right) }{K_{{\lambda\psi}}\left( z,\,\ov z_0\right) K_{{\lambda\psi}}\left( z_0,\,\ov w\right) }
\end{equation}
is well defined. Note that
\begin{equation}\label{DIAST00}
\mathcal{D}_{z_0}\left( z\right) =\frac{1}{\lambda}\log\Phi\left( z,\,\ov z\right)
\end{equation}
is the diastasis centered in $z_0$ associated to $\omega$ and that $\mathcal{D}_{z_0}$ is defined on whole $M$. Since we can repeat this argument for any $z_0 \in M$, we conclude that the diastasis $\mathcal{D} : M \times M \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ is globally defined.
\emph{\bf (c) $\Rightarrow$ (d).} Arguing as in \lq\lq{\bf (b) $\Rightarrow$ (c)}\rq\rq, the existence of a global diastasis implies that $M$ is a complex product $\Omega \times \mathbb{C}^k$. Therefore, as in \eqref{hilbertspacePhi} $\mathcal{H}_{\lambda, h}\cong\mathcal{H}_{\lambda \mathcal{D}_{z_0}}=\left\{ s\in\operatorname{Hol}(M) \ | \ \, \int_M e^{-\lambda\\mathcal{D}_{z_0}x}|s|^2\frac{\omega^n}{n!}<\infty\right\}$. Assume $\lambda > \lambda_0$ with $\lambda_0$ given by Lemma \ref{lemrose} and consider the {coherent states map} $f$ given by \eqref{eqcoherent}. By Lemma \ref{lembal} $\varepsilon_\lambda$ is a positive constant and by \eqref{pullbackdie} we conclude that $f^*\omega_{FS}= \lambda \omega$.
By \cite[Example 6]{LM03}, the
Calabi's diastasis function $\mathcal{D}_{{FS}}$ associated to $\omega_{FS}$ is such that $e^{-\mathcal{D}_{FS}}$
is globally defined on $\mathbb{C} P^{N}\times\mathbb{C} P^{N}$. Since the diastasis $\mathcal{D}$ is globally defined on $M$, by the hereditary property of the diastasis function
(see \cite[Proposition 6]{calabi}) we get that, for all $x, y\in M$,
\begin{equation}\label{fondequ}
e^{-\mathcal{D}_{FS}(f(x), f(y) )}= e^{-\lambda \mathcal{D}(x, y)}=\left(e^{- \mathcal{D}(x, y)}\right)^{\lambda}
\end{equation}
is globally defined on $M\times M$.
Since, by \cite[Example 6]{LM03}, $e^{-\mathcal{D}_{FS}(p, q)}\leq 1$ for all $p, q\in \mathbb{C} P^{N}$ it follows that $e^{-\mathcal{D}(x, y)}\leq 1$ for all
$x, y\in M$.
By Lemma \ref{thmberezin}, it remains to show that $e^{-\mathcal{D}(x, y)}=1$ iff $x=y$. By (\ref{fondequ})
and by the fact that $e^{-\mathcal{D}_{FS}(p, q)}=1$ iff $p=q$ (again by \cite[Example 6]{LM03})
this is equivalent to the injectivity of the coherent states map $f$. This follows by \cite[Theorem 3]{dlh}, which asserts that a K\"{a}hler\ immersion of a homogeneous K\"{a}hler\ manifold into a finite or infinite dimensional complex projective space is one to one.
\emph{\bf (d) $\Rightarrow$ (a).} By the very definition of Berezin quantization there exists a global potential for $(M, \omega)$. By Lemma \ref{THMA} we deduce, as above, that $M$ is a complex product $\Omega \times \mathbb{C}^k$, where $\Omega$ is a bounded homogeneous domain which is contractible.\hspace*{\fill}$\Box$
\vskip 0.5cm
\noindent
{\bf Proof of Theorem \ref{THM05}}
\noindent
By (c) in Theorem \ref{THM03}, the diastasis $\mathcal{D}: M \times M \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ is globally defined. Assume that $\lambda\, \omega$ is balanced i.e. that ${\varepsilon}_\lambda$ is a positive constant. Since the ${\varepsilon}_\lambda$ does not depend on the K\"{a}hler\ potential, by \eqref{epsilon1} we have
\begin{equation}\label{epsilon2}
{\varepsilon}_{\lambda}\left( z,\, \ov w\right)=e^{-\lambda\,\mathcal{D}_{z_0}\left( z,\, \ov w\right)}K_{\lambda\,\mathcal{D}_{z_0}}\left( z,\, \ov w\right)=C
\end{equation}
where $\mathcal{D}_{z_0}\left( z,\, \ov w\right)$ denote the analytic continuation of $\mathcal{D}_{z_0}\left( z\right)$ and $K_{\lambda\mathcal{D}_{z_0}}$ is the reproducing kernel for $\mathcal{H}_{\lambda\mathcal{D}_{z_0}}$. By \eqref{PSI00}, with $\ov w = \ov z_0$, we get $\mathcal{D}_{z_0}\left( z,\, \ov z_0\right)= \frac{1}{\lambda} \log\Phi\left( z,\,\ov z_0\right)=0$. Hence
\begin{equation*
C= e^{-\lambda\,\mathcal{D}_{z_0}\left( z,\, \ov z_0\right)} K_{\lambda\,\mathcal{D}_{z_0}}\left( z,\, \ov z_0\right)=K_{\lambda\,\mathcal{D}_{z_0}}\left( z,\, \ov z_0\right) \in \mathcal{H}_{\lambda\,\mathcal{D}_{z_0}}.
\end{equation*}
Thus $\mathcal{H}_{{\lambda\,\mathcal{D}_{z_0}}}$ contains the constant functions and
\[
\int_M e^{-\lambda\,\mathcal{D}_{z_0}}\ \frac{\omega^n}{n!}<\infty.
\]
Therefore, by definition of diastatic entropy,
\[
\operatorname{Ent} \left( M ,\omega\right)\left( z_0 \right) <\lambda<\infty.
\]
On the other hand, if for some $z_0$, $\operatorname{Ent} \left( M,\omega\right)(z_0)<\lambda$, then $\mathcal{H}_{\lambda\mathcal{D}_{z_0}}\not =\lbrace 0 \rbrace$ and by Lemma \ref{lembal} we conclude that $\lambda \omega$ is balanced. \hspace*{\fill}$\Box$
\begin{rmk}\rm
From the previous proof, we see that if $M$ is simply-connected, then $\operatorname{Ent}(M, \omega)(z_0) = \lambda_0$ for any $z_0 \in M$, where $\lambda_0$ is the positive constant defined in Lemma \ref{lemrose}.
\end{rmk}
|
\section{Introduction}
The mysterious radio source, called Sagittarius $A^{*}$, at the centre of Milky Way, with a mass of around $4\times 10^6 M_{\odot}$ is considered to be a supermassive black hole. To a distant observer, the black hole casts a relatively large ``shadow'' with an apparent diameter of $\sim 10$ gravitational radii\footnote{The diameter of the ``shadow'' will be slightly different in the case of a rotating black hole.} due to bending of light by the black hole. The predicted size of the shadow of Sagittarius $A^{*}$, ($\sim 30\mu$arcsec), will be probed in the next few decades, using the Event Horizon Telescope via Very Long Baseline Interferometry \cite{1}.
The original investigation of the shadow of a Schwarzschild black hole \cite{Synge} has been extended to
a number of other cases, including Kerr black holes \cite{11}, (see also \cite{19,20,20b}), Kerr-Newman black holes \cite{12}, Schwarzschild-de Sitter black holes \cite{12B}, Tomimatsu-Sato space-times \cite{13}, black holes in extended Chern-Simons modified gravity \cite{14}, rotating braneworld black holes \cite{15A,15},
Kaluza-Klein rotating dilaton black holes \cite{16}, for the Kerr-NUT black holes \cite{17}, Kerr-Newman-NUT black holes with a cosmological constant \cite{21}, and multi-black holes \cite{18}. Shadows for black holes in modified gravity \cite{Moffat}, and the five-dimensional rotating Myers-Perry black hole \cite{Papnoi} have also been investigated. The effect of scattering on the visibility of the shadow was numerically demonstrated by Falcke, Melia and Agol \cite{2}. The visual appearance of an accretion disk was studied with the help of various ray-tracing programs by several authors \cite{3,4,5,6}. The overview of observations and the simulations of phenomena for the black hole in the centre of our galaxy was studied in \cite{7}.
Most of these investigations of black hole shadows are for idealized cases, dealing with exact solutions in the absence of matter. It is clearly desirable to seek alternatives to this case, particularly those for which external sources of matter influence the black hole. Indeed, to understand the properties of black holes as astrophysical objects predicted by the theory of general relativity, it is essential to study their interaction with external matter sources.
A particularly relevant example from astrophysics is that of a black hole in a binary system, where tidal effects from its partner distort the black hole. Although the best way of studying such dynamical systems is numerical analysis, obtaining the most general dynamical exact black hole solution interacting with a general matter configuration is
out of reach. However considerable insight can be gained from studying exact solutions describing a black hole distorted by external matter. Distorted black holes have been of considerable interest for quite some time \cite{Geroch, Israel,Chandrasekhar,Tomimatsu,Breton:1997,Peters,Xanthopoulos,Fairhurst,ASF,ASP}. Such solutions approximate those of dynamical black holes that relax on a time scale much shorter than that of the external matter.
Here we investigate how the shadow of a distorted black hole gets deformed. The space-time we consider not asymptotically flat because the sources of distortion are exterior to the black hole region we study: the observer of the shadow is not located at asymptotic infinity, but rather at a finite distance from the black hole, in a vacuum region that is interior to the external sources. We are interested in situations where the distorting potential does not dominate over the potential of the black hole. For this reason we restrict ourselves to the study of small distortions, and for simplicity we consider only the simplest such types. We define the concept of a `local shadow', a shadow seen by an observer not located at asymptotic infinity\footnote{The shadow for an observer not at infinity has been considered in \cite{21}. However, our definition of local shadow is different.}.
One of our key results is that of relating the deformations of the local shadow of the black hole to its distortion parameters such as the quadruple and octupole multiple moment of the distortion fields. We also find eyebrow structures for a single distorted black hole, similar to that which occurs for two merging black holes \cite{merge}.
In Section 2, we first review the solution representing a distorted axisymmetric Schwarz\-schild black hole. In Section 3, we construct the null geodesic equations for this space-time. In Section 4, we construct a map which would enable us to define the local shadow. In Section 5, we present and discuss our results, and finish with Section 6 where, we sum up. In what follows employ units where $G=c=1$.
\section{Metric}
We consider a Schwarzschild black hole in an external gravitational field. The solution is static and axisymmetric and its metric can be presented in the following form \cite{Geroch},
\begin{eqnarray}\n{St1}
d\mathcal{S}^{2}&=&-\left(1-\frac{2M}{\rho}\right)e^{2U}d\mathcal{T}^{2}\nonumber\\
&+&\left(1-\frac{2M}{\rho}\right)^{-1}e^{-2U+2V} d\rho^{2}\nonumber\\
&+&e^{-2U}\rho^{2}(e^{2V}d\theta^{2}+\sin^{2}\theta d\phi^{2})\,,
\end{eqnarray}
Here, $U=U(\rho,\theta)$ and $V=V(\rho,\theta)$ are functions of $\rho$ and $\theta$. For $U=V=0$, this metric represents a Schwarzschild black hole. The null rays in this space-time have four conserved quantities, energy $\mathcal{E}$, angular momentum $\tilde{L}$, the azimuthal angular momentum $\tilde{L}_z$, and $u_\mu u^\mu=0$, where $u^{\mu}=dx^{\mu}/d\tau$ is the photon 4-velocity, with $\tau$ an affine parameter along a null geodesic.
It is convenient to write the metric \eq{St1} in dimensionless form,
\begin{eqnarray}
dS^{2}&=&-\left(1-\frac{1}{r}\right)e^{2U}dT^{2}+\left(1-\frac{1}{r}\right)^{-1}e^{-2U+2V} d\rho^{2}\nonumber\\
&+&e^{-2U}r^{2}(e^{2V}d\theta^{2}+\sin^{2}\theta d\phi^{2})\,
\end{eqnarray}
where
\begin{eqnarray}
d\mathcal{S}^{2}=r_g^2dS^{2},~~~ T=\frac{\mathcal{T}}{r_g}, ~~~\rho={r_g}r, \n{con1}
\end{eqnarray}
with $r_g=2M$. The explicit form of $U$ and $V$ as a functions of $r$ and $\theta$ are
\begin{eqnarray}
U&=&\sum_{n\ge 0} c_nR^nP_n\nonumber\\
V&=&\sum_{n\ge 1}c_n\sum_{l\ge 0}^{n-1}\left[\cos{\theta}-(2r-1)\right. \nonumber\\
&&\left. -(-1)^{n-l}((2r-1)+\cos{\theta})\right]R^{l}P_l \nonumber\\
&+& \sum_{n,k\ge 1}\frac{nkc_nc_k}{n+k}R^{n+k}(P_nP_k-P_{n-1}P_{k-1})
\end{eqnarray} where, $P_n$ are the Legendre polynomials of the first kind\footnote{Legendre polynomials are solutions to Legendre's differential equation,
\begin{equation}
\frac{d}{dx}\left[(1-x^2)\frac{d}{dx}P_n(x)\right]+n(n+1)P_n(x)=0 \nonumber\\ \, .
\end{equation} They can be written by using Rodrigues' formula,
\begin{equation}
P_n(x)=\frac{1}{2^nn!}\frac{d^n}{dx^n}\left[(x^2-1)^n\right] \nonumber\\ \, .
\end{equation}},
\begin{eqnarray}
P_n&=&P_n((2r-1)\frac{\cos{\theta}}{R})\nonumber\\
R&=&\sqrt{(2r-1)^2-\sin^2{\theta}}.
\end{eqnarray}
Moreover, the metric can be written in the form
\begin{eqnarray}
dS^2& =& e^{-2u_{0}}\left[-(1-\frac{1}{r})e^{2\mathcal{U}}dt^2 +{(1-\frac{1}{r})}^{-1}{e^{-2\mathcal{U}+2V}}dr^2\right.\nonumber\\
&&+\left.e^{-2\mathcal{U}}r^{2}(e^{2V}d\theta^2+\sin^2{\theta}d\phi^2) \right],\n{ST3}
\end{eqnarray}
where
\begin{equation}
\mathcal{U}={U}-u_0,~~~ u_0=\sum_{n\ge 0}c_{2n},~~~ t=Te^{2u_0}\n{STcomformal}
\end{equation} In order to avoid the conical singularities in the space-time we must have
\begin{equation}
\sum_{n\ge 0}c_{2n+1}=0. \n{nocon}
\end{equation}
In what follows, we construct the null geodesic equations of the following metric
\begin{eqnarray}
ds^2& =& -(1-\frac{1}{r})e^{2\mathcal{U}}dt^2 +{(1-\frac{1}{r})}^{-1}{e^{-2\mathcal{U}+2V}}dr^2\nonumber\\
&&+e^{-2\mathcal{U}}r^{2}(e^{2V}d\theta^2+\sin^2{\theta}d\phi^2) ,\n{ST4}
\end{eqnarray}
Note, that metric \eq{ST4} is related to \eq{St1} by conformal transformations and redefinitions of the time coordinate. The null geodesic equations are conformally invariant.
\section{Null geodesics}
To construct the shape of the shadow of the space-time \eq{ST4}, we need to study the null geodesics for this space-time.
As with Schwarzschild space-time, the space-time (\ref{ST4}) possesses two commuting Killing vectors
\begin{equation}\n{Kil}
\xi_{(t)}^{\mu}=\delta^{\mu}_{t},~~~~
\xi_{(\phi)}^{\mu}=\delta^{\mu}_{\phi},
\end{equation}
corresponding to the symmetries of time translation and rotation around the $z$ axis. The corresponding quantities conserved along geodesics of the space-time are
\begin{eqnarray}
E &\equiv&-u_{\mu}\xi^{\mu}_{(t)}=\left(1-\frac{1}{r}\right)e^{2\mathcal{U}}\,\dot{t}\,,\nonumber\\
L_{z} &\equiv&u_{\mu}\xi^{\mu}_{(\phi)}=e^{-2\mathcal{U}}r^{2}\sin^{2}\theta\,\dot{\phi} \n{Con}
\end{eqnarray}
respectively, the photon energy $E$ and azimuthal angular momentum $L_{z}$.
Here $u^{\mu}=dx^{\mu}/d\tau$ is the photon 4-velocity, normalized as $u^{\mu}u_{\mu}=0$, with $\tau$ an affine parameter along a null geodesic. The geodesic equation is
\begin{equation}\n{Geo}
\frac{D^{2}x^{\mu}}{d\tau^{2}}=\frac{d^2 x^\mu}{d\tau^2}+\Gamma_{\alpha\nu}^\mu \frac{d x^\alpha}{d\tau}
\frac{d x^\nu}{d\tau}=0\,,
\end{equation}
$\Gamma_{\alpha\nu}^\mu$ are the Christoffel symbols defined in terms of the metric tensor.
From \eq{Con}, we see that $d\phi/d\tau$ has monotonic behaviour, never changing sign along a particular trajectory.
Therefore, we introduce
\begin{eqnarray}
\dot{r}&=&\frac{dr}{d\tau}=\frac{dr}{d\phi}\frac{d\phi}{d\tau}=r'\dot{\phi}\, , \nonumber\\
\dot{\theta}&=&\frac{d\theta}{d\tau}=\frac{d\theta}{d\phi}\frac{d\phi}{d\tau}=\theta'\dot{\phi} \, . \n{devchange}
\end{eqnarray}
Here, the overdot denotes the derivative with respect to the affine parameter, and prime defines the derivate with respect to $\phi$.
The geodesic equations take the following form
\begin{eqnarray}
r''&=&-\frac{r'^{2}}{2}\left[\frac{h_{,r}}{h}+2\frac{f_{,r}}{f}+\frac{3-4r}{r(r-1)}\right]\nonumber\\
&+&\frac{\theta'^{2}}{2}(r-1)\left[r \frac{h_{,r}}{h}+2\right]\nonumber\\
&+& \theta' r' \left[-\frac{f_{,\theta}}{f}-\frac{h_{,\theta}}{h}+2\cot\theta\right]\nonumber\\
&-&\frac{r^{3}\sin^{4}\theta}{2l_{z}^{2}hf^{3}(r-1)}\left[1+r(r-1)\frac{f_{,r}}{f}\right]\nonumber\\
&-&\frac{1}{hf}\sin^{2}\theta (r-1)\left[\frac{rf_{,r}}{2f}-1\right].\\
\theta''&=&\frac{r'^{2}h_{,\theta}}{2r(r-1)h}
+\frac{\theta'^{2}}{2}\left[- \frac{h_{,\theta}}{h}-2\frac{f_{,\theta}}{f}+4\cot\theta\right]\nonumber\\
&-&\theta' r' \left[\frac{h_{,r}}{h}+\frac{f_{,r}}{f}\right]\nonumber\\
&-&\frac{r^{3}\sin^{4}\theta f_{,\theta}}{2l_{z}^{2}hf^{4}(r-1)} - \frac{\sin^{2}\theta}{2hf}\left[\frac{f_{,\theta}}{2f}-2\cot\theta\right]
\end{eqnarray}
where, $f=e^{2\mathcal{U}}$, $h=e^{-2\mathcal{U}+2V}$, $r''=d^{2}r/d\phi^{2}$, $\theta''=d^{2}\theta/d\phi^{2}$, and we have defined $l_{z}={L_{z}/E}$.
We also have the following constraint
\begin{eqnarray}
&&u_{\mu}u^{\mu}=0\, , \nonumber\\
&&-\frac{r^4\sin^4\theta}{f^2l_z^2}+r^2\sin^2\theta F+fhr'^2+r^2Ffh\theta'^2=0 \n{umuum} \nonumber\\
\end{eqnarray}
where $F=1-1/r$.
In order to study the effect of distortions on the black hole, we consider the simplest cases. The simplest type of distortion is due to a monopole $c_0\neq 0$ and $c_{n}=0$ for $n>0$. The next less trivial distortion is due to a dipole $c_0\neq0$ and $c_{1}\neq 0$. In this case from condition (\ref{nocon}), we have $c_{1}=-c_{3}$, and we consider $c_n=0$ for any other $n$. The other case is the quadrupole moment where $c_0\neq 0$ and $c_{2}\neq 0$ and $c_{n}=0$ for any other case. We shall consider the dipole and quadrupole cases separately. Recall that since we made the conformal transformation (\ref{ST3}-\ref{STcomformal}) the quantity $c_0$ does not contribute to our result.
Here, we have assumed that in analogy to the Newtonian multiple moments we have $c_0>c_1>c_2>...>c_n$. Note that if we calculate the multiple moments for a static axisymmetric Newtonian gravitational potential
of two point-like masses $M_1$ and $M_2$ and a ring located on the equator of the axis joining the two masses, we find that $c_0>c_1>c_2>...>c_n$, and the ring contributes only to the even multiple moments. In this sense a quadrupole multiple moment $c_2$ is analogous to that of a ring around the black hole.
For the quadrupole distortion we have
\begin{eqnarray}
V& =&-2c_2\sin^2{\theta}\left[2r-1+18c_2r^4\cos^2{\theta}-36c_2r^3\cos^2{\theta} \right. \nonumber\\
&+& 22c_2r^2\cos^2{\theta}-4c_2r\cos^2{\theta}-2c_2r^4 \nonumber\\
&+& \left. 4c_2r^3-2c_2r^2\right], \\
\mathcal{U}&=&-c_2+\frac{c_2}{2}(2r-1)^2(3\cos^2\theta-1)+\frac{c_2}{2}\sin^2\theta.
\end{eqnarray}
For the dipole distortions (odd multiple moments) we have
\begin{eqnarray}
V& =& A\cos{\theta}+A_0\cos^2{\theta}+A_1\cos^4{\theta}+A_2
\nonumber\\
\mathcal{U}&=&-c_1\cos{\theta}\left[r\left[\cos^2{\theta}(20r^2-30r+12)\right.\right. \nonumber\\
&-&\left.(12r^2-18r+8)\left. \right]+\sin^2{\theta}\right]
\end{eqnarray}
where the functions $A$, $A_0$, $A_1$, $A_2$ of $(r,\theta)$ are given by
\begin{eqnarray}
A& =& 2c_1\sin^2{\theta}\left[6r(r-1)+1\right] \, ,\nonumber\\
A_0&=& -2{c_1}^2r\sin^2{\theta}\left[-168r^5+504r^4-570r^3\right. \nonumber\\
&+&\left. 300r^2-72r+6\right] \, , \nonumber\\
A_1&=& -2{c_1}^2r\sin^2{\theta}\left[300r^5-900r^4+1008r^3\right. \nonumber\\
&-&\left. 516r^2+117r-9\right] \, , \nonumber\\
A_2&=& -2{c_1}^2r\sin^2{\theta}\left[12r^5-36r^4+42r^3 \right. \nonumber\\
&-& \left. 24r^2+7r-1\right] \, .
\end{eqnarray}
\section{Map}
Our goal is to see how an observer located at $(r_{o},\theta_{o})$ sees the shadow of a distorted black hole. Consider rays emitted from any point on a sphere of radius $r_{e}$ around the black hole that may reach the observer located at $(r_{o},\theta_{o})$ or else be absorbed by the black hole as shown in figure \ref{Fig1}. This observer is located in the interior region, which means that the sources responsible for the distortion of the black hole are all located at $r > r_{o} \geq r_{e}$.
To analyze the problem we consider rays emitted at $(r_{o},\theta_{o})$ and trace them backward to their source. In order to characterize properties of rays emitted at $(r_{o},\theta_{o})$, which are directly connected with observation, we proceed as follows. First we choose the following orthonormal tetrad
\begin{eqnarray}
&&e^{\mu}_{0}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{(1-\frac{1}{r})f}}\delta^{\mu}_{t} \Big|_{o},~~~
e^{\mu}_{1}=\sqrt{\frac{1}{h}(1-\frac{1}{r})}\delta^{\mu}_{r}\Big|_{o} \, , \nonumber\\
&&e^{\mu}_{2}=\frac{1}{r\sqrt{h}}\delta^{\mu}_{\theta}\Big|_{o}, ~~~
e^{\mu}_{3}=\frac{\sqrt{f}}{r\sin\theta}\delta^{\mu}_{\phi}\Big|_{o}\, . \n{ortho}
\end{eqnarray}
at the point of the observation,
where $...\Big|_{o}$ stands for the limit where $r=r_{o}$ and $\theta=\theta_{o}$.
These vectors are orthonormal. In what follows, we use $(t,r,\theta,\phi)$ coordinates and the indices are $(0,1,2,3)$, respectively. The vector ${\bf e}_{1}$ is in radial direction to the direction of the black hole. The tangent vector to a null ray is
\begin{equation}
u^{\mu}=\frac{dx^{\mu}}{d\tau}.\n{tangent}
\end{equation}
We project this vector into the observer's orthonormal frame.
Thus, the tangent vector at the observation point $(r_{o},\theta_{o})$ can be written as
\begin{equation}
u^{\mu}=\beta(-e^{\mu}_{0}+\xi^{1} e^{\mu}_{1}+\xi^{2} e^{\mu}_{2}+\xi^{3} e^{\mu}_{3}),\n{tangent2}
\end{equation}
where $\xi^{1}$, $\xi^{2}$, and $\xi^{3}$ are displacement angles. Replacing \eq{ortho} in \eq{tangent2} and comparing to \eq{tangent} and using \eq{Con}, we find the value of the scalar coefficient $\beta$
\begin{eqnarray}
&&\beta=-\frac{E}{\sqrt{(1-\frac{1}{r})f}}. \n{beta1}
\end{eqnarray}
Consider a photon that gets emitted from a point located on a sphere of radius ${r}_{e}$. Following the motion of this null ray forward, it will either get captured by the black hole or reach the eye of the observer located at $(r_{o},\theta_{o})$ depending on the shape of the black hole. To determine the shadow of the black hole, we instead trace the trajectory of these photons backward (see figure \ref{Fig1}). The quantities $\xi^{2}$, $\xi^{3}$ give the angle of the photon as it reaches the observer located at point $(r_o,\theta_o)$. Suppose the observer is looking in the direction of the centre of the black hole. Tracing straight backward null rays
leaving the observer at angles $\xi^{2}$, $\xi^{3}$ as if the space were flat, it appears to him/her that the photon has reached his/her eye from the point
$\bar{\xi}^{2}=\xi^{2} r_o$ and $\bar{\xi}^{3}=\xi^{3} r_o$ on the plane of the black hole. If this null ray is absorbed by the black hole, we consider $(\bar{\xi}^{2}, \bar{\xi}^{3})$ to be a black point on the plane of the black hole -- by definition it is a member of the ``local shadow'' of the black hole, so named because the observer is not located at asymptotic infinity. Replacing \eq{ortho} in \eq{tangent2} and comparing to \eq{tangent}, we find the displacement angles $\xi^{2}$, and $\xi^{3}$ and using \eq{beta1}. Moreover, by multiplying by $r_o$ and using \eq{devchange} we find
\begin{eqnarray}
&&\bar{\xi}^{2}=\pm\frac{l_{z}}{\sin^{2}\theta}f^{\frac{3}{2}}\sqrt{h(1-\frac{1}{r})}\theta'\Big|_{o},\n{t1a}\nonumber\\
&&\bar{\xi}^{3}=-\frac{l_{z}}{\sin\theta}f\sqrt{1-\frac{1}{r}}\Big|_{o}.\n{t2a}
\end{eqnarray}
On the other hand, if this null ray reaches a radius $r_{e}$, (after propagating in the space-time) it is not a member of the local shadow of the black hole.
\begin{figure}
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=6cm]{Slide1.pdf}
\caption{ The photon emitted from a point on the sphere of radius $r_{e}$ reaches an observer located at $(r_{o},\theta_{o})$. ${\bf e}_{\theta}$ and ${\bf e}_{\phi}$ are unit vectors of the observer's orthonormal tetrad directed along the coordinate lines of $\theta$ and $\phi$. The red dashed line represents an example of a null trajectory that reaches the observer.}\label{Fig1}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
Before we close this section of the map we perform a ``test''. We want to see if by taking the limit $r\rightarrow\infty$ and setting the distortions to zero $(f=h=1)$ we will get the map \cite{11},
\begin{eqnarray}
\bar{\xi}^{2}&=&-\dot{\theta}\frac{r^2\sqrt{1-\frac{1}{r}}}{E}\Big|_{r\rightarrow\infty}\, . \n{test1}
\end{eqnarray} At infinity and without distortions the system is completely integrable and the equation of motion for the $\dot{\theta}$ is given in the following form,
\begin{equation}
\dot{\theta}=-\frac{\sqrt{{L_0}^2\sin^2{\theta}-{L_z}^2}}{r^2\sin{\theta}}\, .
\end{equation} Therefore \eq{test1} takes the form,
\begin{eqnarray}
\bar{\xi}^{2}&=&\sqrt{{l_0}^2-\frac{{l_z}^2}{\sin^2{\theta}}} \n{t1} \, .
\end{eqnarray} For $\bar{\xi}^{3}$ we have,
\begin{eqnarray}
\bar{\xi}^{3}&=&-\frac{l_z}{\sin{\theta}}\sqrt{1-\frac{1}{r}}\Big|_{r\rightarrow\infty}=
-\frac{l_z}{\sin{\theta}} \, . \n{t2}
\end{eqnarray}
We see that equations (\ref{t1},\ref{t2}) match with the equations for the map of undistorted black holes \cite{11}.
In the Schwarzschild undistorted space-time, \eq{St1} for $U=V=0$, there exists a second rank Killing tensor $K_{\mu\nu}$ ($K_{(\mu\nu;\alpha)}=0$) which generates another conserved quantity, the squared total angular momentum of a photon
\begin{equation}
{\tilde{L}}^{2}\equiv K^{\alpha\beta}u_{\alpha}u_{\beta}\,.\n{L}
\end{equation}
For the critical impact parameter $\tilde{b}^2_\text{critical}=\tilde{L}^2/\mathcal{E}^2=27M^2$, the light enters a circular knife-edge orbit of radius $\rho=3M$, and may orbit the black hole for part of an orbit or for many turns before it escapes or plunges. These rays barely escape the Schwarzschild black hole and form the rim of the black hole shadow. For the rescaled metric \eq{ST3} with $\mathcal{U}=V=0$. These rays have $L^2/E^2=27/4$ where, $L=\tilde{L}/r_g$ and $\mathcal{E}=r_gE$. For an observer located at infinity this implies that
\begin{eqnarray}
(\bar{\xi}^2)^2+(\bar{\xi}^3)^2=\frac{27}{4}.\n{ShwShadow0}
\end{eqnarray}
Note that, usually the radius of the shadow of a Schwarzschild black hole as seen by an observer at infinity is $3\sqrt{3}M$. However, in our case, since, $\rho=2Mr$, (see \eq{con1}), the radius of the shadow of a Schwarzschild black hole as seen by an observer at infinity is $\sqrt{27}/4=3\sqrt{3}/2$. From equation (\ref{t2a}), when $f=h=1$, for an observer located at $r_o$, we have
\begin{eqnarray}
(\bar{\xi}^2)^2+(\bar{\xi}^3)^2=\frac{{l_{z}}^2(r_o-1)}{\sin^4 \theta r_o} \left(\theta'^2 +\sin^2\theta\right)
=\frac{27(r_o-1)}{4r_o}\nonumber\\
\n{M1}
\end{eqnarray}
upon setting $L^2/E^2\equiv l^2=27/4$ and using ${l_{z}}^2\theta' = {\sin\theta}\sqrt{l^2 \sin^2\theta-{l_{z}}^2}$ from
Schwarzschild space-time.
\section{Results and Discussion}
Here we study the effect of distortions on the local shadow of an undistorted black hole. Imagine for example that there is a ring around the black hole with radius $R$, and the observer is at a radius $r_o<R$. The distortions are characterized in terms of the multiple moments $c_n$. For simplicity we consider the lowest order multiple moments (considering odd and even moments separately). In choosing the appropriate value of multiple moment, we suppose its value to be small enough that the ratio $f=g_{tt\text{d}}/g_{tt}$ of the $tt$-component of the distorted black hole metric to its Schwarzschild counterpart is not very large, i.e., $f < 10$. This ratio is illustrated in Figure \ref{Fig_13}.
We have also calculated the $f$ and $h$ functions in figures \ref{Fig_13}-\ref{Fig_12}. We need to consider smaller values of $c_1$ compared to $c_2$. For example, $c_1=1/150$ is a very strong distortion, such that $g_{tt\text{d}}/g_{tt}>10000$. We need to keep in mind that we want to consider a black hole distorted by external sources that are not much stronger gravitationally than the black hole itself. We consider $-1/150<c_2<1/150$; for this range of values of $c_2$ we have, $g_{tt\text{d}}/g_{tt} < 2.6$. We assume, $-1/800<c_1<1/800$; we find $g_{tt\text{d}}/g_{tt} < 6$ for this range of values of $c_1=-c_3$.
In the following, we consider only the case where $r_{e}=r_{o}$. In our numerical computations, for every photon trajectory with initial values $\bar{\xi}^{3}$ and $\bar{\xi}^{2}$, we compute $l_z$, $\theta'$.
From the constraint equation \eq{umuum} we can derive $r'$ as following
\begin{equation}
r'=\biggl[ \frac{r^4 \sin^4\theta}{f^3 l_z^2 h}-\frac{r^2 \sin^2\theta}{fh}(1-\frac{1}{r})-r^2\theta'^2(1-\frac{1}{r})\biggl]^{\frac{1}{2}}. \n{rp1}
\end{equation}
From \eq{rp1}, we see that $\bar{\xi}^{3}$ and $\bar{\xi}^{2}$ cannot take every value. Computing this quantity
for any choice of
$(r_{o},\theta_{o})$ yields
\begin{equation}
r'(r_{o},\theta_{o}) = \frac{r^2 \sin^4\theta}{f^3 l_z^2 h}\Big|_{(r_{o},\theta_{o})}\sqrt{r^2_{o} -
(\bar{\xi}^{3})^2-(\bar{\xi}^{2})^2}
\n{xy}
\end{equation}
and for $\bar{\xi}^{3}$ and $\bar{\xi}^{2}$ outside a circle of radius $r_o$, the expression under the root becomes negative. Thus relation \eq{xy} gives us the range of values of $\bar{\xi}^{3}$ and $\bar{\xi}^{2}$ that are valid. Numerically, we divide the interior region of the circle of \eq{xy} to small pixels of side 0.01; for each of these values we compute the corresponding photon trajectory. We see whether this trajectory ends inside the black hole or escape the black hole, namely reaches radius $r_{o}$. For each trajectory, we calculate the maximum deviation from the constraint \eq{umuum}. From this we find the maximum deviation from the constraint for all the trajectories, which we find to be $4\times 10^{-4}$.
\begin{figure}[htb]
\begin{center}
\begin{eqnarray}
&&\includegraphics[width=6cm]{com1.pdf}\nonumber\\
&& \includegraphics[width=6cm]{com.pdf}
\end{eqnarray}
\caption{ Comparison of $g_{ttd}$ of the distorted black hole (black), to $g_{tt}$ of the Schwarzschild black hole (grey).
Top: $c_1=1/800$;
bottom for $c_2=1/150$.
\label{com}}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure}[htb]
\begin{center}
\begin{eqnarray}
&&\includegraphics[width=6cm]{f1.pdf}\nonumber\\
&&\includegraphics[width=6cm]{f2.pdf}
\end{eqnarray}
\caption{ $f$ function for distorted black hole. Top: $c_1=1/800$; Bottom $c_2=1/150$ }\label{Fig_13}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure}[htb]
\begin{center}
\begin{eqnarray}
&&\includegraphics[width=6cm]{h1.pdf}\nonumber\\
&&\includegraphics[width=6cm]{h2.pdf}
\end{eqnarray}
\caption{ $h$ function for distorted black hole. Top: $c_1=1/800$; Bottom: $c_2=1/150$. }
\label{Fig_12}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure}[htb]
\begin{center}
\begin{eqnarray}
&&\includegraphics[width=6cm]{neg45even.pdf}\nonumber\\
&&\includegraphics[width=6cm]{neg90even.pdf}
\end{eqnarray}
\caption{ \label{Fig_5} On the top we can see the shadow of a black hole for an observer at $\theta_o=\pi/4$ and radius $r_o=5$; the values of the multiple moments are $c_2=-\frac{1}{150}$, (with red, (3)) $c_2=-\frac{1}{300}$, (with black, (2)) and $c_2=0$, (which is the undistorted case with blue, (1)). On the bottom we can see the shadow of a black hole for an observer at $\theta_o=\pi/2$ and radius $r_o=5$; the values of the multiple moments are $c_2=-\frac{1}{150}$, (with red, (3)) $c_2=-\frac{1}{300}$, (with black, (2)) and $c_2=0$, (which is the undistorted case with blue, (1)).}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure}[htb]
\begin{center}
\begin{eqnarray}
&&\includegraphics[width=6cm]{pos45even.pdf}\nonumber\\
&&\includegraphics[width=6cm]{pos90even.pdf}
\end{eqnarray}
\caption{ \label{Fig_6} On the top we can see the shadow of a black hole for an observer at $\theta_o=\pi/4$ and radius $r_o=5$; the values of the multiple moments are $c_2=\frac{1}{150}$, (with red, (3)) $c_2=\frac{1}{300}$, (with black, (2)) and $c_2=0$, (which is the undistorted case with blue, (1)). On the bottom we can see the shadow of a black hole for an observer at $\theta_o=\pi/2$ and radius $r_o=5$; the values of the multiple moments are $c_2=\frac{1}{150}$, (with red, (3)) $c_2=\frac{1}{300}$, (with black, (2)) and $c_2=0$, (which is the undistorted case with blue, (1)).}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure}[htb]
\begin{center}
\begin{eqnarray}
&&\includegraphics[width=6cm]{pos45odd.pdf}\nonumber\\
&&\includegraphics[width=6cm]{pos90odd.pdf}
\end{eqnarray}
\caption{ \label{Fig_7} On the top we can see the shadow of a black hole for an observer at $\theta_o=\pi/4$ and radius $r_o=5$; the values of the multiple moments are $c_1=\frac{1}{800}$, (with red, (3)) $c_1=\frac{1}{1000}$, (with black, (2)) and $c_1=0$, (which is the undistorted case with blue, (1)). On the bottom we can see the shadow of a black hole for an observer at $\theta_o=\pi/2$ and radius $r_o=5$; the values of the multiple moments are $c_1=\frac{1}{1000}$, (with red, (2)) $c_1=\frac{1}{800}$, (with black, (3)) and $c_1=0$, (which is the undistorted case with blue, (1)).}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure}[htb]
\begin{center}
\begin{eqnarray}
&&\includegraphics[width=6cm]{neg45odd.pdf}\nonumber\\
&&\includegraphics[width=6cm]{neg90odd.pdf}
\end{eqnarray}
\caption{ \label{Fig_8} On the top we can see the shadow of a black hole for an observer at $\theta_o=\pi/4$ and radius $r_o=5$; the values of the multiple moments are $c_1=-\frac{1}{1000}$, (with red, (2)) $c_1=-\frac{1}{800}$, (with black, (3)) and $c_1=0$, (which is the undistorted case with blue, (1)). On the bottom we can see the shadow of a black hole for an observer at $\theta_o=\pi/2$ and radius $r_o=5$; the values of the multiple moments are $c_1=-\frac{1}{800}$, (with red, (3)) $c_1=-\frac{1}{1000}$, (with black, (2)) and $c_1=0$, (which is the undistorted case with blue, (1)).}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
We present the effect of distortions for even multiple moments in figures \ref{Fig_5}-\ref{Fig_6}. We see that for an observer located in the equatorial plane, $\theta_o=\pi/2$ the shadow looks like an ellipse. For positive and negative even multiple moments $c_2$, we respectively obtain prolate and oblate shadow shapes. As the multiple moment increases through positive values, the shadow becomes more prolate, whereas it becomes more oblate for increasingly negative values. For an observer not located on the equatorial plane, the local shadow of the black hole moves upward or downward in the impact plane of observer. As the magnitude of the negative multiple moment increases, the shadow moves down (when $\bar{\xi}^2$ is the horizontal axes, illustrated in figure \ref{Fig_5}). As the value of positive multiple moment increases the shadow moves up, as shown in figure \ref{Fig_6} .
Since the shadow looks like an ellipse for an observer located at $\theta_o=\pi/2$, we fit the shape of the shadow to an ellipse, taking $a$ and $b$ to be its semi-major/semi-minor axes, the origin at the centre,
and the angular coordinate $\phi$ to be measured from the axis $\bar{\xi}^3$. To find $a$ and $b$ we minimize the normalized square error
\begin{equation}
J=\frac{\sum_{i=0}^m (\rho^{\text{numer}}_i-\rho_i)^2}{\sum_{i=0}^m(\rho^{\text{numer}}_i)^2},\n{fit1}
\end{equation}
with
\begin{eqnarray}
&&\rho^{\text{numer}}_i=[(\bar{\xi}^{3})^2+(\bar{\xi}^{2})^2]^{1/2},\nonumber\\
&&\rho_i=\frac{ab}{\sqrt{b^2\cos^2\phi_i+a^2\sin^2\phi_i}}, \nonumber\\
&&\phi_i=\arctan(\frac{\bar{\xi}^{2}}{\bar{\xi}^{3}}),\n{fit2}
\end{eqnarray}
where $\rho^{\text{numer}}_i$ is given by our numerical result, and $\rho_i$ is the equation of the ellipse for every $\phi_i$.
In figure \ref{Fig_9} we plot the parameters $a$ and $b$ as a function of the quadrupole moment $c_2$ for an observer located on the equator ($\theta_o=\pi/2$) and at a fixed distance $r_o$ from the centre of the black hole. To find this relationship, we assumed that $a$ and $b$ are linear functions of $c_2$ and that the intercept is given by the value $({27(r_o-1)}/{4r_o})^{1/2}$ (see equation (\ref{M1})). Obtaining the slope, we see that the assumption of linearity between $a$ or $b$ and $c_2$ is a good one, since it gives a fitting error comparable or smaller than the size of our pixel, (recall that this is $0.01$).
\begin{figure}[htb]
\begin{center}
\begin{eqnarray}
&& \includegraphics[width=6cm]{Figr4.pdf}\nonumber\\
&& \includegraphics[width=6cm]{Figr5.pdf}
\end{eqnarray}
\caption{ \label{Fig_9} The parameters of the ellipse $a$ (red, (2)) and $b$ (blue, (1)) vs. the multiple moment $c_2$. Top: observer at $r_o=4$; Bottom: observer at $r_o=5$. }
\end{center}
\end{figure}
For the observer on the equatorial plane and distance $r_o=4$, we find
\begin{equation}
a=-99.68c_2+2.25,~~~b=22.58c_2+2.25,
\end{equation}
where the respective errors in the fits for $(a,b)$ are $(4.3\times 10^{-4}, 1.1\times 10^{-6})$. As stated, these errors are smaller than the size $0.01$ of our pixel, and so this is the actual error. For $c_2=0$ the shadow is a circle of radius $2.25$.
For an observer on the equatorial plane at $r_o=5$, the values are
\begin{equation}
a=-161.96c_2+2.32,~~~b=34.11c_2+2.32,
\end{equation}
where the fitting errors for $(a,b)$ are now $(3.5\times 10^{-2},1.2\times 10^{-4})$ respectively. For $c_2=0$ the shadow is a circle of radius $2.32$. As the observer moves away from the black hole the radius of the circle increases. For the undistorted Schwarzschild geometry ($c_2=0$), and the shadow is a circle of radius $3\sqrt{3}/2\sim 2.598$ (see \eq{ShwShadow0}) for
an observer located at infinity. Table \ref{Table1} indicates that as the observer is moves away from the black hole the magnitudes of the slopes of the parameters $a$ and $b$ increase. This is also valid for the intercepts.
\begin{table*}[t]
\caption{\label{Table1} Obtained values and errors of the parameters $a$ and $b$ for an observer on the equatorial plane at $r_o$.}
\begin{tabular}{| c| c| c | c| c | }
\hline
$r_o$ & $a$ & error in $a$ fitting & $b$ & error in $b$ fitting\\
\hline
3 & $a=-41.85c_2+2.12$ & $1.34\times 10^{-4}$ & $b=8.89c_2+2.12$ & $7.25\times 10^{-4}$\\
4 & $a=-99.68c_2+2.25$& $4.3\times 10^{-4}$ & $b=22.58c_2+2.25$ &$1.1\times 10^{-6}$ \\
5 & $a=-161.96c_2+2.32$ & $3.5\times 10^{-2}$ & $b=34.11c_2+2.32$ & $1.2\times 10^{-4}$\\
6 & $a=-251.63c_2+2.37$ & $2.4\times 10^{-2}$ & $b=44.27c_2+2.37$ & $3.3\times 10^{-5}$\\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\end{table*}
Though it seems that the parameters $a$ and $b$ vanish for large values of $c_2$,
we emphasize that these slopes are valid only for small values $-1/150<c_2<1/150$ of the quadrupole moment. Had we
included larger values, say $-1/5<c_2<1/5$, then the slopes in Table \ref{Table1} would have been totally different, since distortions drastically dominate over the black hole potential for larger values of the multiple moments.
The comparison of the shadow of a distorted black hole to the embedding of its horizon is interesting. The horizon surface, $t=\text{const}$, $r=1$, of the distorted black hole \eq{ST4} is given by
\begin{eqnarray}
dS_H^2=e^{-2\mathcal{U}_H} (e^{2 {V}_H}d\theta^2+\sin^2{\theta}d\phi^2) \n{HorizonMetric}
\end{eqnarray}
where, $\mathcal{U}_H =\mathcal{U}(r=1,\theta)$ and $V_H =V(r=1,\theta)$.
Consider isometrically embedding this 2-dimensional axisymmetric metric into the 3-dimensional space
\begin{eqnarray}
ds^2=\epsilon dz^2+d\rho^2+\rho^2 \n{Embed}
\end{eqnarray}
where $(Z,\rho,\phi)$ are cylindrical coordinates. Setting $\epsilon=1$ corresponds to Euclidean space, whereas $\epsilon=-1$ corresponds to pseudo-Euclidean space. We have $Z=Z(\theta)$, and $\rho=\rho(\theta)$. Matching the metrics ($\ref{HorizonMetric}$) and ($\ref{Embed}$), we derive the following embedding map
\begin{eqnarray}
&&\rho(\theta)=e^{-{\mathcal{U}_H}}\sin\theta, \nonumber\\
&&Z(\theta)=\int_{\theta}^{\pi/2}\left[\epsilon(e^{-2\mathcal{U}_H+2V_H}-\rho_{,\theta'}^2)\right]^{\frac{1}{2}}d\theta'.
\end{eqnarray}
For even multiple moments the horizon is deformed to an ellipse. Using the same fitting method as before, we find
\begin{equation}
a=1.07c_2+1,~~~ b=-2.11 c_2+1 \n{Hembedding}
\end{equation}
where we have fixed the intercept of the linear fit to be $1$ and found the slope; the errors in the above fittings are of order $10^{-5}$.
Quite counterintuitively, for positive $c_2$ the horizon of the black hole is oblate whilst its shadow is prolate. For the negative $c_2$ the opposite occurs: a prolate horizon has an oblate shadow. As noted above, a positive $c_2$ corresponds to a ring on the equatorial plane in Newtonian gravity. We can see from the bottom plot of figure \ref{com} that for $c_2 > 0$, $g_{ttd}$ of the distorted black hole around the equator is less than that of an undistorted Schwarzschild black hole, whereas on axis $g_{ttd}$ is greater. This implies that the gravitational field on the equator for a distorted black hole is greater than the undistorted case and weaker on axis\footnote{Note that for $c_2>0$ the function \[\mathcal{U}=-\frac{c_2}{2}-\frac{c_2}{2}\left(2r-1\right)^2 \, , \]
on the equator is always negative. Therefore $f=g_{ttd}/g_{tt}<1$.}. On the equator there exists the effect of the gravitational field of both the ring and the black hole. For a quadrupole moment $c_2$ the equations of motion imply that on the equatorial plane $\ddot{\theta}=0$ when
$\dot{\theta}=0$ (note that $f_{,\theta}$ and $h_{,\theta}$ vanish on the equator in this case). This implies the existence of planar motion. Since the equations of motion are integrable on the equator, we can construct an effective potential $V$ for the planar motion of null rays \cite{Wheeler}
\begin{figure}[htb]
\begin{center}
\hfill
\includegraphics[width=6cm]{xi3com.pdf}
\hfill \, { }
\caption{ $\bar{\xi}_3$ as a function of the position of the observer in the equatorial plane.The blue, (1), colour corresponds to the undistorted case whereas the black, (2), colour corresponds to the distorted one. The value of $c_2=1/150$. \label{xi3com}
\label{xi3com}}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
\begin{eqnarray}
\frac{1}{l_z^2}(\frac{d\tilde{r}}{d\tilde{t}})^2=\frac{1}{l_z^2}-V^2,
\end{eqnarray}
where
\begin{eqnarray}
&&V^2=\frac{1}{r^2}(1-\frac{1}{r})f^2, \nonumber\\
&&d\tilde{t}=[f(1-\frac{1}{r})]^{1/2},\nonumber\\
&& d\tilde{r}=[h(1-\frac{1}{r})^{-1}]^{1/2} \, .
\end{eqnarray}
The maximum of the effective potential is equal to the value of $1/l_z^2$ or $1/{b_{critical}^2}$ for the knife-edge orbit. For $c_2=1/150$ we have $1/{b_{critical}^2}=0.1389$. Using \eq{t2a}, for an observer located on the equator and $r_o=5$ this corresponds to $\bar{\xi}^3=1.3894$, which shows that the shadow of the distorted black hole on the equator has a smaller diameter than that of an undistorted Schwarzschild black hole, for which $\bar{\xi}^3=2.32$ confirming the result of a prolate shadow for $c_2> 0$. The knife-edge orbit is located at radius $r=1.50$, (or, $\rho=3M$), for the undistorted case. For $c_2=1/150$ this orbit is at $r=1.46$. Evidently the attractive influence of the ring allows potentially escaping null rays to more closely approach the black hole.
The angular momentum of the photons for the knife edge orbit is larger than the undistorted case. If instead of \eq{t2a}, which is valid for a local observer, we had the map \eq{t2} (which is for an observer at infinity) this would immediately imply that $\bar{\xi}_3$ would be larger for a distorted black hole. However the function $f$ plays an important role in \eq{t2a}; on the equator it is always less than one and decreases as $r$ increases. As a consequence $\bar{\xi}_3$ decreases with distance, implying the horizontal axis of the ellipse decreases in size as the observer gets further and further away from the black hole. For an observer very close to the black hole $\bar{\xi}_3$ has almost the same value of that of a Schwarzschild
black hole. This is illustrated in figure \ref{xi3com}.
While our metric represents a vacuum space-time, there must be (more distant) matter sources causing distortion of
the black hole. Provided these sources are located in some finite-sized region
we can extend the solution beyond this (non-vacuum) region to a yet more distant vacuum region. In this exterior region we must replace the expansions of the functions $\mathcal{U}$ and $V$ with expansions in terms of exterior multiple moments. In this exterior vacuum region the function $f$ increases until becomes unity at infinity. Assuming the angular momentum of the photon is conserved as it (traced backward) passes through the non-vacuum and exterior vacuum regions, an observer in the exterior vacuum region can use the critical value of the angular momentum of the photon to deduce $\bar{\xi}_3$. For an observer located at infinity $\bar{\xi}_3$ is larger than that of the undistorted Schwarzschild black hole.
In figure \ref{LF1} we illustrate a schematic representation of an oblate horizon and a prolate shadow. All the observers in the $(x,y)$ plane (at any $\phi$ angle) see the same shadow shape. For illustration purposes the projection of the shadow was made on the other side of the black hole rather than on the plane of the black hole.
\begin{figure}[htb]
\begin{center}\label{LF1}
\includegraphics[width=8cm]{LF.pdf}
\caption{ Schematic representation of an oblate horizon and a prolate shadow. }\label{LF1}
\end{center}
\end{figure}\label{LF1}
One can say that the black hole horizon is more ``rigid" than that of the black hole shadow, i.e. a larger value of the multipole moment $c_2$ is required in order to deform the horizon as much as the black hole shadow.
Note that for very large values of multiple moments (which we do not consider), the horizon cannot be embedded in Euclidian space. For a 2-dimensional axisymmetric metric if the Gauss curvature is negative at the fixed points of the rotation group, it is impossible to isometrically embed a region containing such a fixed point in Euclidean space $\mathbb{E}^{3}$. Such surfaces can be globally embedded in $\mathbb{E}^{4}$ \cite{Berger}. In the case of Schwarzschild black hole, with quadrupole distortion the Gauss curvature for $c_{2}>1/12$ becomes negative at both of the poles, $\theta=0$, and $\theta=\pi$. Similarly, for the octupole distortion, the Gauss curvature becomes negative at one of the poles for $|c_{3}|>1/20$. For multipole moments greater than or equal to these values, the horizon surface of the distorted black hole cannot be isometrically embedded in a flat 3D space.
For odd multiple moment $c_1$, the shadow is illustrated in figures \ref{Fig_7}-\ref{Fig_8}. Here we observe an ``eyebrow'' structure for large values of multiple moments (e.g. $c_1=1/800$), reminiscent of those seen for the shadow of two merging black holes \cite{merge}. For an observer in the equatorial plane the shadow looks like an incomplete ellipse that is flattened on one side; furthermore the shape of the shadow is mirror-reflected with respect to the $\bar{\xi}^3$ axis upon changing the sign of the multipole moment from positive to negative. For an observer in the $\theta_o=\pi/4$ plane, we see the negative odd multiple moment to have a shape similar to that of the positive even multiple moment in the same plane; however the width of the shapes are smaller than the ones for even multiple moment.
\section{Summary}
In many astrophysical situations, such as a black hole in a binary system, the black hole is distorted. Light rays emitted from sources behind the black hole will either be absorbed by it or escape to an observer located at some finite distance
$(r_{o},\theta_{o})$ from the black hole. If a photon gets emitted from a point located on a sphere of radius ${r}_{e}$,
the boundary of the set of rays reaching this observer bounds the `local shadow' of the black hole for this observer.
We have introduced this notion of local shadow in precise terms and computed it for a distorted Schwarzschild black hole by
tracing back the trajectory of these photons. A null ray traced back from the point $(r_{o},\theta_{o})$, with initial parameters $(\bar{\xi}^{2}, \bar{\xi}^{3})$ will be part of the local shadow if this null ray is absorbed by the black hole; if it reaches a radius $r_{e}$ (after propagating in the space-time) it is not part of ``local shadow'' of the black hole. The parameters $(\bar{\xi}^{2}, \bar{\xi}^{3})$ are related to the initial velocity $\theta'$, integral of motion $l_z$, and the position of the observer.
For a quadrupole distortion, $c_2\neq 0$ we found that the shadow was deformed from a circle to an ellipse. As the magnitude of the quadrupole moment $c_2$ increases, the shadow gets increasingly deformed . Rather unexpectedly, we found that
positive values of $c_2$ the shadow is prolate whereas the horizon is oblate; for $c_2<0$ the reverse occurs, with a prolate horizon having an oblate shadow. We have shown analytically why this phenomenon occurs for a local observer. However we expect that an observer at infinity will see the apparent shape of an oblate black hole (i.e., its shadow) to be either oblate or a circle of greater radius than for the undistorted case\footnote{This oblate/circle ambiguity is due to the fact that we cannot deduce the value of $\bar{\xi}^{2}$ at infinity analytically.}. The horizon is very rigid, i.e., it is harder to deform the horizon and easier to have a deformed shadow. In this paper, we don't consider large enough distortions which distort the horizon effectively, since we do not want the distorting potentials to dominate over the potential of the black hole.
\begin{acknowledgments}
The authors are grateful to the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada for financial support. The authors S. A. and C. T. also acknowledge support by the DFG Research Training Group 1620 ``Models of Gravity''. The authors would like to acknowledge Don N. Page for a useful comment.
\end{acknowledgments}
|
\section{Introduction}
Background subtraction (also referred as foreground extraction) has been extensively studied in decades\cite{GGMM,bouwmans2008background,Maddalena08,ICA09,ChangJC12,liu2011Surveillance}, yet it still remains open in real surveillance applications due to the following challenges:
{\small \textbullet} \; Dynamic backgrounds. A scene environment is not always static but sometimes highly dynamic, \emph{e.g.}, rippling water, heavy rain and camera jitter.
{\small \textbullet} \; Lighting and illumination variations, particularly with sudden changes.
{\small \textbullet} \; Indistinct foreground objects having similar appearances with surrounding backgrounds.
\begin{figure}[ptb]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=3.4in]{ExhibitResults.pdf}
\end{center}
\caption{Some challenging scenarios for foreground object extraction are handled by our approach: (i) a floating bottle with randomly dynamic water (in the left column), (ii) waving curtains around a person (in the middle column), and (iii) sudden light changing (in the right column).}
\label{fig:exhibit}
\end{figure}
In this paper, we address the above mentioned difficulties by building the background models with the online pursuit of spatio-temporal models. Some results generated by our system for the challenging scenarios are exhibited in Fig.~\ref{fig:exhibit} . Prior to unfolding the proposed approach, we first review the existing works in literature.
\subsection{Related Work}
Due to their pervasiveness in various applications, there is no unique categorization on the existing works of background subtraction. Here we introduce the related methods basically according to their representations, to distinguish with our approach.
The {\bf pixel-processing} approaches modeled observed scenes as a set of independent pixel processes, and they were widely applied in video surveillance applications~\cite{lin2012integrating,liu2011Surveillance} . In these methods~\cite{GGMM,ZGMM,ImGMM,bouwmans2008background}, each pixel in the scene can be described by different parametric distributions (\emph{e.g.} Gaussian Mixture Models) to temporally adapt to the environment changes. The parametric models, however, were not always compatible with real complex data, as they were defined based upon some underlying assumptions. To overcome this problem, some other non-parametric estimations~\cite{NPARA,Bayesian,TIPbayesian08,Vibe} were proposed, and effectively improved the robustness. For example, Barnich et al.~\cite{Vibe} presented a sample-based classification model that maintained a fixed number of samples for each pixel and classified a new observation as background when it matched with a predefined number of samples. Liao et al.~\cite{SILTP} recently employed the kernel density estimation (KDE) technique to capture pixel-level variations. Some distinct scene variations, \emph{i.e.} illumination changes and shadows, can be explicitly alleviated by introducing the extra estimations~\cite{GMMIllu}. Guyon et al.~\cite{guyon2013foreground} proposed to utilize the low rank matrix decomposition for background modeling, where the foreground objects constituted the correlated sparse outliers. Despite acknowledged successes, this category of approaches may have limitations on complex scenarios, as the pixel-wise representations overlooked the spatial correlations between pixels.
The {\bf region-based} methods built background models by taking advantages of inter-pixel relations, demonstrating impressive results on handling dynamic scenes. A batch of diverse approaches were proposed to model spatial structures of scenes, such as joint distributions of neighboring pixels~\cite{Bayesian,SP10}, block-wise classifiers~\cite{BKClassification}, structured adjacency graphs~\cite{OLISVM}, auto-regression models~\cite{PDTM,Kalman}, random fields~\cite{CRF}, and multi-layer models~\cite{PixelLayers} etc. And a number of fast learning algorithms were discussed to maintain their models online, accounting for environment variations or any structural changes. For example, Monnet et al.~\cite{PDTM} trained and updated the region-based model by the generative subspace learning. Cheng et al.~\cite{OLISVM} employed the generalized 1-SVM algorithm for model learning and foreground prediction. In general, methods in this category separated the spatial and temporal information, and their performances were somewhat limited in some highly dynamic scenarios, \emph{e.g.} heavy rains or sudden illumination changes.
The third category modeled scene backgrounds by exploiting both spatial and temporal information. Mahadevan et al.~\cite{STSALI} proposed to separate foreground objects from surroundings by judging the distinguished video patches, which contained different motions and appearances compared with the majority of the whole scene. Zhao et al.~\cite{CCIPCABS} addressed the outdoor night background modeling by performing subspace learning within video patches. Spatio-temporal representations were also extensively discussed in other vision tasks such as action recognition~\cite{liang2013action} and trajectory parsing~\cite{liu2013trajectory}. These methods motivated us to build models upon the spatio-temporal representations, \emph{i.e.} video bricks.
In addition, several {\bf saliency-based} approaches provided alternative ways based on spatio-temporal saliency estimations~\cite{OpFlow,STSALI,BackICCV01}. The moving objects can be extracted according to their salient appearances and/or motions against the scene backgrounds. For example, Wixson et al.~\cite{OpFlow} detected the salient objects according to their consistent moving directions over time. Kim et al.~\cite{STSaliency} used a discriminant center-surround hypothesis to extract foreground objects around their surroundings.
Along with the above mentioned background models, a number of reliable image features were utilized to better handle the background noise~\cite{lin2010layered}. Exemplars included the Local Binary Pattern (LBP) features~\cite{LBP,LTP,CSLBP} and color texture histograms~\cite{ColorText}. The LBP operators described each pixel by the relative graylevels of its neighboring pixels, and their effectiveness has been demonstrated in several vision tasks such as face recognition and object detection~\cite{LBP,LBPMetric,lin2012representing}. The Center-Symmetric LBP was proposed in \cite{CSLBP} to further improve the computational efficiency. Tan and Triggs~\cite{LTP} extended LBP to LTP (Local Ternary Pattern) by thresholding the graylevel differences with a small value, to enhance the effectiveness on flat image regions.
\subsection{Overview}
In this work, we propose to learn and maintain the dynamic models within spatio-temporal video patches (\emph{i.e.} video bricks), accounting for real challenges in surveillance scenarios~\cite{lin2012integrating}. The algorithm can process $15 \sim 20$ frames per second in the resolution $352 \times 288$ (pixels) on average. We briefly overview the proposed framework of background modeling in the following aspects.
{\bf 1. Spatio-temporal representations.} We represent the observed scene by video bricks, \emph{i.e.} video volumes spanning over both spatial and temporal domain, in order to jointly model spatial and temporal information. Specifically, at every location of the scene, a sequence of video bricks are extracted as the observations, within which we can learn and update the background models. Moreover, to compactly encode the video bricks against illumination variations, we design a brick-based descriptor, namely Center Symmetric Spatio-Temporal Local Ternary Pattern (CS-STLTP), which is inspired by the 2D scale invariant local pattern operator proposed in \cite{SILTP}. Its effectiveness is also validated in the experiments.
{\bf 2. Pursuing dynamic subspaces.} We treat each sequence of video bricks at a certain location as a consecutive signal, and generate the subspace within these video bricks. The linear dynamic system (\emph{i.e.} Auto Regressive Moving Average, ARMA model~\cite{ARMA}) is adopted to characterize the spatio-temporal statistics of the subspace. Specifically, given the observed video bricks, we express them by a data matrix, in which each column contains the feature of a video brick. The basis vectors (\emph{i.e.} eigenvectors) of the matrix can be then estimated analytically, representing the appearance parameters of the subspace, and the parameters of dynamical variations are further computed based on the fixed appearance parameters. It is worth mentioning that our background model jointly captures the information of appearance and motion as the data (\emph{i.e.} features of the video bricks) are extracted over both spatial and temporal domains.
\begin{figure*}[ptb]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{Feature.pdf}
\end{center}
\caption{An example of computing the CS-STLTP feature. For one pixel in the video brick, we construct four spatio-temporal planes. The center-symmetric local ternary patterns for each plane is calculated, which compares the intensities in a center-symmetric direction with a contrasting threshold $\tau$. The CS-STLTP feature is concatenated by the vectors of the four planes.}
\label{fig:feature}
\end{figure*}
{\bf 3. Maintaining dynamic subspaces online.} Given the newly appearing video bricks with our model, moving foreground objects are segmented by estimating the residuals within the related subspaces of the scene, while the background models are maintained simultaneously to account for scene changes. The raising problem is to update parameters of the subspaces incrementally against disturbance from foreground objects and background noise. The new observation may include noise pixels (\emph{i.e.} outliers), resulting in degeneration of model updating~\cite{CCIPCABS,PDTM}. Furthermore, one video brick could be partially occluded by foreground objects in our representation, \emph{i.e.} only some of pixels in the brick are true positives. To overcome this problem, we present a novel approach to compensate observations (\emph{i.e.} the observed video bricks) by generating data from the current models. Specifically, we replace the pixels labeled as non-background by the generated pixels to synthesize the new observations. The algorithm for online model updating includes two steps: (i) update appearance parameters using the incremental subspace learning technique, and (ii) update dynamical variation parameters by analytically solving the linear reconstruction. The experiments show that the proposed method effectively improves the robustness during the online processing.
The remainder of this paper is arranged as follows. We first present the model representation in Section~\ref{sec:represent}, and then discuss the initial learning, foreground segmentation and online updating mechanism in Section~\ref{sec:learn}, respectively. The experiments and comparisons are demonstrated in Section~\ref{sec:exp} and finally comes the conclusion in Section~\ref{sec:conclu} with a summary.
\section{Dynamic Spatio-temporal Model} \label{sec:represent}
In this section, we introduce the background of our model, and then discuss the video brick representation and our model definition, respectively.
\subsection{Background}
In general, a complex surveillance background may include diverse appearances that sometimes move and change dynamically and randomly over time flying~\cite{lin2009stochastic}. There is a branch of works on time-varying texture modeling~\cite{DT,DTRCG,DTSEG} in computer vision. They often treated the scene as a whole, and pursued a global subspace by utilizing the linear dynamic system (LDS). These models worked well on some natural scenes mostly including a few homogeneous textures, as the LDS characterizes the subspace with a set of linearly combined components. However, under real surveillance challenges, it could be intractable to pursue the global subspace. In this work, we represent the observed scene by an array of small and independent subspaces, each of which is defined by the linear system, so that our model is able to handle better challenging scene variations. Our background model can be viewed as a mixed compositional model consisting of the linear subspaces. In particular, we conduct the background subtraction with our model based on the following observations.
{\bf Assumption 1:} The local scene variants (\emph{i.e.} appearance and motion changing over time) can be captured by the low-dimensional subspace.
{\bf Assumption 2:} It is feasible to separate foreground moving objects from the scene background by fully exploiting spatio-temporal statistics.
\subsection{Spatio-temporal Video Brick} \label{sec:feature}
Given the surveillance video of one scene, we first decompose it with a batch of small brick-like volumes. We consider the video brick of small size (\emph{e.g.}, $4\times 4 \times 5$ pixels) includes relative simple content, which can be thus generated by few bases (components). And the brick volume integrates both spatial and temporal information, that we can better capture complex appearance and motion variations compared with the traditional image patch representations.
We divide each frame $I_i$ , $(i\,=\,1,2,\dots,n)$ into a set of image patches with the width $w$ and height $h$. A number $t$ of patches at the same location across the frames are combined together to form a brick. In this way, we extract a sequence of video bricks $V = \{v_{1},v_{2},\dots,v_{n}\}$ at every location for the scene.
Moreover, we design a novel descriptor to describe the video brick instead of using RGB values. For any video brick $v_i$, we first apply the CS-STLTP operator on each pixel, and pool all the feature values into a histogram. For a pixel $x_c$, we construct a few 2D spatio-temporal planes centered at it, and compute the local ternary patterns (LTP) operator~\cite{LTP} on each plane. The CS-STLTP then encodes $x_c$ by combining the LTP operators of all planes. Note that the way of splitting spatio-temporal planes little affects the operator's performance. To simplify the implementation, we make the planes parallel to the Y axis, as Fig.~\ref{fig:feature} shown.
We index the neighborhood pixels of $x$ by $\{0, \ldots, M \}$, the operator response of the $j$-th plane can be then calculated as:
\begin{equation} \label{equ:feature_begin}
\digamma^j(x)\,=\,\overset{\frac{M}{2}-1}{\underset{m=0}{\biguplus}}\,s_{\tau}(p_m,p_{m+\frac{M}{2}}),
\end{equation}
where pixel $k$ and $k+ M/2$ are two symmetric neighbors of pixel $x_c$. $p_k$ and $p_{k+\frac{M}{2}}$ are the graylevels of the two pixels, respectively. The sign $\biguplus$ indicates stretching elements into a vector. The function $s_{\tau}$ is defined as follows:
\begin{equation} \label{equ:feature_end} \begin{aligned}
s_{\tau}(p_m,p_{m+\frac{M}{2}}) = \left\{ \begin{array}{ll}
1,& \;\;\;\textrm{if $p_m > (1+\tau)p_{m+\frac{M}{2}}$},\\
\text{-}1,& \;\;\;\textrm{if $p_m < (1-\tau)p_{m+\frac{M}{2}}$},\\
0,& \;\;\;\textrm{otherwise}.
\end{array} \right.
\end{aligned} \end{equation}
where $\tau$ is a constant threshold for the comparing range.
Suppose that we take $M=8$ neighborhood pixels for computing the operator in each spatio-temporal plane, and the number of planes is $4$. The resulting CS-STLTP vector contains $M/2 \times 4 = 16$ bins. Fig.\ref{fig:feature} illustrates an example of computing the CS-STLTP operator, where we apply the operator for one pixel on $4$ spatial-temporal planes displayed with different colors (\emph{e.g.}, green, blue, purple and orange).
Then we build a histogram for each video brick by accumulating the CS-STLTP responses of all pixels. This definition was previously proposed by Guo et al~\cite{LBPMetric}.
\begin{equation}
H(k) = \Sigma_{x \in v_i} \Sigma_{j = 1}^4 \bf{1}( \digamma^j(x), k ), ~~k \in [0, K ],
\end{equation}
where $\bf{1}(a, b)$ is an indicator function, i.e. $\bf{1}(a, b) = 1$ only if $a = b$. To measure the operator response, we transform the binary vector of CS-STLTP into a uniform value that is defined as the number of spatial transitions (bitwise changes) following, as discussed in~\cite{LBPMetric} . For example, the pattern (\emph{i.e.} the vector of $16$ bins) $0000000000000000$ has a value of $0$ and $1000000000000000$ of $1$. In our implementation, we further quantize all possible values into $48$ levels. To further improve the capability, we can generate histograms in each color channel and concatenate them together.
The proposed descriptor is computationally efficient and compact to describe the video brick. In addition, by introducing a tolerative comparing range in the LTP operator computation, it is robust to local spatio-temporal noise within a range.
\subsection{Model Definition} \label{sec:model}
Let $m$ be the descriptor length for each brick, and $V = \{v_1, v_2, \dots, v_n\}$, $v_i \in \mathbb{R}^{m}$ be a sequence of video bricks at a certain location of the observed background. We can use a set of bases (components) $\mathbf{C} = [C_1,C_2,\dots,C_d]$ to represent the subspace where $V$ lies in. Each video brick $v_i$ in $V$ can be represented as
\begin{equation}
v_i = \underset{j=1}{\overset{d}{\sum}} \, z_{i,j} C_j + \omega_i,
\label{eq:videobrick}
\end{equation}
where $C_j$ is the $j$-th basis ($j$-th column of matrix $\mathbf{C}$) of the subspace, $z_{i,j}$ the coefficient for $C_j$, and $\omega_i$ the appearance residual. We denote $\mathbf{C}$ to represent appearance consistency of the sequence of video bricks. In some traditional background models by subspace learning, $z_{i,j}$ can be solved and kept as a constant, with the underlying assumption that the appearance of background would be stable within the observations. In contrast, we treat $z_{i,j}$ as the variable term that can be further phrased as the time-varying state, accounting for temporally coherent variations (\emph{i.e.} the motions). For notation simplicity, we neglect the subscript $j$, and denote $Z = \{ z_1, z_2, \ldots, z_n \}$ for all the bricks. The dynamic model is formulated as,
\begin{equation}\label{eq:varying}
z_{i+1}\,=\,Az_i \,+\, \eta_i,
\end{equation}
where $\eta_i$ is the state residual, and $A$ is a matrix of $ d \times d$ dimensions to model the variations. With this definition, we consider $A$ representing the temporal coherence among the observations.
Therefore, the problem of pursuing dynamic subspace is posed as solving the appearance consistency $\mathbf{C}$ and the temporal coherence $A$, within the observations. Since the sequence states $Z$ are unknown, we shall jointly solve $\mathbf{C}$, $A$, $Z$ by minimizing an empirical energy function $\mathcal{F}_n(\mathbf{C},A,Z)$:
\begin{equation} \label{equ:formulation}
\min\, \mathcal{F}_n(\mathbf{C},A,Z) = \frac{1}{2n}\,\underset{i=1}{\overset{n}{\sum}} \, \| v_i - Cz_i \|_2^2 + \| z_i - A z_{i-1} \|_2^2 .
\end{equation}
Here $\mathcal{F}_n(\mathbf{C},A,Z)$ is not completely convex but we can solve it by fixing either $Z$ or $(\mathbf{C}, A)$. Nevertheless, its computation cost is expensive for learning the entire background online. Here we simplify the dynamic model in Equation (\ref{eq:varying}) into a linear system, following the auto-regressive moving average (ARMA) process. In literature, Soatto et al.~\cite{DT} originally associated the output of ARMA model with dynamic textures, and showed that the first-order ARMA model, driven by white zero-mean Gaussian noise, can capture a wide range of dynamic textures. In our approach, the difficulty of modeling the dynamic variations can be alleviated due to the brick-based representation, i.e. the observed scene is decomposed into video bricks. Thus, we consider the ARMA process a suitable solution to model the time-varying variables, which can be solved efficiently. Specifically, we introduce a robustness term (\emph{i.e.} matrix) $B$, which includes a number $d_\epsilon$ of bases, and we set $\eta_i = B \epsilon_i$, where $\epsilon_i$ denotes the noise.
We further summarize the proposed dynamic model, where we add the subscript $n$ to the main components, indicating they are solved within a number $n$ of observations, as,
\begin{equation} \label{equ:model} \begin{aligned}
& v_i\,=\,\mathbf{C}_{n}\,z_i\,+\,\omega_{i}, \\
& z_{i+1}\,=\,A_{n}\,z_{i}\,+\,B_{n}\,\epsilon_{i}, \\
& \omega_{i}\,\overset{IID}{\sim}\,N(0,\Sigma_{\omega}), \;\;\epsilon_{i}\,\overset{IID}{\sim}\,N(0,I_{d_\epsilon}).
\end{aligned} \end{equation}
In this model, $\mathbf{C}_n \in \mathbb{R}^{m \times d}$ and $A_n \in \mathbb{R}^{d \times d}$ represent the appearance consistency and temporal coherence, respectively. $B_{n} \in \mathbb{R}^{d \times d_{\epsilon}} $ is the robustness term constraining the evolution of $Z$ over time. $\omega_i \in \mathbb{R}^{m}$ indicates the residual corresponding to observation $v_i$, and $\epsilon_{i} \in \mathbb{R}^{d_\epsilon}$ the noise of state variations. During the subspace learning, $\omega_i$ and $\epsilon_{i}$ are assumed to follow the zero-mean Gaussian distributions. Given a new brick mapped into the subspace, $\omega_i$ and $\epsilon_{i}$ can be used to measure how likely the observation is suitable with the subspace, so that we utilize them for foreground object detection during online processing.
The proposed model is time-varying, and the parameters $\mathbf{C}_n, A_n, B_n$ can be updated incrementally along with the processing of new observations, in order to adapt our model with scene changes.
\section{Learning Algorithm}\label{sec:learn}
In this section, we discuss the learning for spatio-temporal background models, including initial subspace generation and online maintenance. The initial learning is performed at the beginning of system deployment, when only a few foreground objects move in the scene. Afterwards, the system switches to the mode of online maintenance.
\subsection{Initial Model Learning}\label{sec:offllearn}
In the initial stage, the model defined in Equation (\ref{equ:model}) can be degenerated as a non-dynamic linear system, as the $n$ observations are extracted and fixed. Given a brick sequence $V = \{v_{1},v_{2},\dots,v_{n}\}$, we present an algorithm to identify the model parameters $\mathbf{C}_{n},\,A_{n},\,B_{n}$, following the sub-optimal solution proposed in~\cite{DT}.
To guarantee the Equation (\ref{equ:model}) has an unique and canonical solution, we postulate
\begin{equation} \label{equ:assumption} \begin{aligned}
&n \gg d,\;\;\text{Rank}(\mathbf{C}_n)\,=\,d,\;\;\mathbf{C}_n^\top \mathbf{C}_n\,=\,I_d,
\end{aligned} \end{equation}
where $I_d$ is the identity matrix of dimension $d \times d$. The appearance consistency term $\mathbf{C}_n$ can be estimated as,
\begin{equation} \label{equ:learnC} \begin{aligned}
\mathbf{C}_n\,&=\,\underset{\mathbf{C}_n}{\operatorname{arg\,min}}\;\vert\; W_n - \mathbf{C}_{n}\,[\;z_1\;z_2\;\cdots\;z_n\;]\; \vert \\
\end{aligned} \end{equation}
where $W_n$ is the data matrix composed of observed video bricks $[v_1,v_2,\cdots,v_n]$. The equation.(\ref{equ:learnC}) satisfies the full rank approximation property and can be thus solved by the singular value decomposition (SVD). We have,
\begin{eqnarray}
W_n = U \Sigma Q^\top, \\\nonumber
U^\top U = I, Q^\top Q = I,
\end{eqnarray}
where $Q$ is the unitary matrix, $U$ includes the eigenvectors, and $\Sigma$ is the diagonal matrix of the singular values. Thus, $\mathbf{C}_{n}$ is treated as the first $d$ components of $U$, and the state matrix $[z_1\;z_2\;\cdots\;z_n]$ as the product of $d \times d$ sub-matrix of $\Sigma$ and the first $d$ columns of $Q^\top$.
The temporal coherence term $A_{n}$ is calculated by solving the following linear problem:
\begin{equation}
A_{n}\,=\,\underset{A_n}{\operatorname{arg\,min}}\; \vert \; [\;z_2\;z_3\;\cdots\;z_{n}\;] - A_{n}[\;z_1\;z_2\;\cdots\;z_{n-1}\;] \; \vert.
\end{equation}
The statistical robustness term $B_{n}$ is estimated by the reconstruction error $E$
\begin{equation} \begin{aligned}
E & \,=\,[\;z_2\;z_3\;\cdots\;z_{n}\;]\,-\,A_{n}\,[\;z_1\;z_2\;\cdots\;z_{n-1}\;] \\
& \,=\,B_{n}\,[\;\epsilon_1\;\epsilon_2\;\cdots\;\epsilon_{n-1}\;],
\end{aligned} \end{equation}
where $B_{n} \cong \frac{1}{\sqrt{n-1}}\,E$. Since the rank of $A_n$ is $d$ and $d \ll n$, the rank of input-to-state noise $d_\epsilon$ is assumed to be much smaller than $d$. That is, the dimension of $E$ can be further reduced by SVD: $E = U_\epsilon\,\Sigma_\epsilon\,Q_\epsilon^\top$, and we have
\begin{equation} \begin{aligned}
& B_{n}\!=\!\frac{1}{\sqrt{n-1}}\left[\!\begin{array}{cccc} U_\epsilon^1 & \cdots & U_\epsilon^{d_\epsilon} \end{array}\!\right]\!\left[\! \begin{array}{cccc} \Sigma_\epsilon^1 & & \\
& \ddots & \\
& & \Sigma_\epsilon^{d_\epsilon} \end{array}\!\right].
\end{aligned} \end{equation}
The values of $d$, $d_\epsilon$ essentially imply the complexity of subspace from the aspects of appearance consistence and temporal coherence, respectively. For example, video bricks containing static content can be well described with a function of low dimensions while highly dynamic video bricks (\emph{e.g.}, from an active fountain) require more bases to generate. In real surveillance scenarios, it is not practical to pre-determine the complexity of scene environments. Hence, in the proposed method, we adaptively determine $d$, $d_\epsilon$ by thresholding eigenvalues in $\Sigma$ and $\Sigma_\epsilon$, respectively.
\begin{equation} \label{equ:dyndim} \begin{aligned}
& d^\ast\,=\,\underset{d}{\operatorname{arg\,max}}\;\Sigma^d\,>\,T_d, \\
& d_\epsilon^\ast\,=\,\underset{d_\epsilon}{\operatorname{arg\,max}}\;\Sigma_\epsilon^{d_\epsilon}\,>\,T_{d_\epsilon},
\end{aligned} \end{equation}
where $\Sigma^d$ indicates the $d$-th eigenvalue in $\Sigma$ and $\Sigma_\epsilon^{d_\epsilon}$ the $d_\epsilon$-th eigenvalue in $\Sigma_\epsilon$.
\subsection{Online Model Maintenance}\label{sec:ollearn}
Then we discuss the online processing with our model that segments foreground moving objects and keeps the model updated.
{\bf (I) Foreground segmentation.~~} Given one newly appearing video brick $v_{n+1}$, we can determine whether pixels in $v_{n+1}$ belong to the background or not by thresholding their appearance residual and state residual. We first estimate the state of $v_{n+1}$ with the existing $\mathbf{C}_{n}$,
\begin{equation} \label{equ:seg_begin}
z'_{n+1}\,=\,\mathbf{C}_{n}^\top \, v_{n+1},
\end{equation}
and further the appearance residual of $v_{n+1}$
\begin{equation}\label{equ:appearance}
\omega_{n+1}\,=\,v_{n+1}\,-\,\mathbf{C}_n z'_{n+1}.
\end{equation}
As the state $ z_n$ and the temporal coherence $A_n$ have been solved, we can then estimate the state residual $\epsilon_n$ according to Equation (\ref{equ:model}),
\begin{equation} \label{equ:seg_end} \begin{aligned}
& B_n \epsilon_{n} \,=\, z'_{n+1} \,-\, A_n z_n \\
\Rightarrow\, & \epsilon_{n} \,=\, \operatorname{pinv}(B_n)\,(z'_{n+1} \,-\, A_n z_n),
\end{aligned} \end{equation}
where $\operatorname{pinv}$ denotes the operator of pseudo-inverse.
With the state residual $\epsilon_{n}$ and the appearance residual $\omega_{n+1}$ for the new video brick $v_{n+1}$, we conduct the following criteria for foreground segmentation, in which two thresholds are introduced.
\begin{enumerate}
\item $v_{n+1}$ is classified into background, only if all dimensions of $\epsilon_{n}$ are less than a threshold $T_\epsilon$.
\item If $v_{n+1}$ has been labeled as non-background, perform the pixel-wise segmentation by comparing $\omega_{n+1}$ with a threshold $T_\omega$: the pixel is segmented as foreground if its corresponding dimension in $\omega_{n+1}$ is greater than $T_\omega$.
\end{enumerate}
{\bf (II) Model updating.~~} During the online processing, the key problem for model updating is to deal with foreground disturbance, \emph{i.e.} to avoid absorbing pixels from foreground objects or noise.
In this work, we develop an effective approach to update the model with the synthesized data. We first generate a video brick from the current model, namely noise-free brick, $\hat{v}_{n+1}$, as
\begin{equation} \label{equ:Syn} \begin{aligned}
& \hat{z}_{n+1}\,=\,A_{n}z_{n}, \\
& \hat{v}_{n+1}\,=\,\mathbf{C}_{n}\,\hat{z}_{n+1}.
\end{aligned} \end{equation}
Then we extract pixels from $\hat{v}_{n+1}$ to compensate occluded (\emph{i.e.} foreground) pixels in the newly appearing brick. Concretely, the pixels labeled as non-background are replaced by the pixels from the noise-free video brick at the same place. We can thus obtain a synthesized video brick $\bar{v}_{n+1}$ for model updating.
Given the brick $\bar{v}_{n+1}$, the data matrix $W_{n}$ composed of observed video bricks is extended to $W_{n+1}$. Then we update the model $\mathbf{C}_{n+1}$ according to Equation (\ref{equ:learnC}).
Our algorithm of model updating includes two steps: (i) update parameters for appearance consistency $\mathbf{C}_{n+1}$ by employing the incremental subspace learning technique, and (ii) update parameters of state variations $A_{n+1}$, $B_{n+1}$.
{\bf (i) Step 1.~~} For the $d$-dimension subspace, with eigenvectors $\mathbf{C}_n$ and eigenvalues $\Lambda_n$, its covariance matrix $\operatorname{Cov}_n$ can be approximated as
\begin{equation} \label{equ:Basis}
\operatorname{Cov}_n \,\thickapprox\, \overset{d}{\underset{j=1}{\sum}}\,\lambda_{n,j} c_{n,j} c_{n,j}^\top \,=\, \mathbf{C}_n \Lambda_n \mathbf{C}_n^\top,
\end{equation}
where $c_{n,j}$ and $\lambda_{n,j}$ denote the $j$-th eigenvector and eigenvalue, respectively. With the newly synthesized data $\bar{v}_{n+1}$, the updated covariance matrix $\operatorname{Cov}_{n+1}$ is formulated as
\begin{equation} \begin{aligned}
\operatorname{Cov}_{n+1} \,&=\,(1-\alpha)\operatorname{Cov}_n\,+\,\alpha\,\bar{v}_{n+1}\,\bar{v}_{n+1}^\top \\
&\approx\,(1-\alpha)\,\mathbf{C}_n \Lambda_n \mathbf{C}_n^\top\,+\,\alpha\,\bar{v}_{n+1}\,\bar{v}_{n+1}^\top \\
&=\,\overset{d}{\underset{i=1}{\sum}}\,(1-\alpha)\,\lambda_{n,i}\,c_{n,i}\,c_{n,i}^\top + \alpha\,\bar{v}_{n+1}\,\bar{v}_{n+1}^\top,
\end{aligned} \end{equation}
where $\alpha$ denotes the learning rate. The covariance matrix can be further re-formulated to simplify computation, as,
\begin{equation}
\operatorname{Cov}_{n+1} \,=\, Y_{n+1} Y_{n+1}^\top,
\end{equation}
where $Y_{n+1} = [y_{n+1,1}\,y_{n+1,2}\,\dots\,y_{n+1,d+1}]$ and each column $y_{n+1,j}$ in $Y_{n+1}$ is defined as
\begin{equation}
y_{i} = \left\{ \begin{array}{ll}
\sqrt{1-\alpha\lambda_j}\,c_{n,i}, & \;\;\;\text{if } 1 < j < d, \\
\sqrt{\alpha}\,\bar{v}_{n+1}, & \;\;\;\text{if } j = d+1. \end{array} \right.
\end{equation}
To reduce the computation cost, we can estimate $\mathbf{C}_{n+1}$ by a smaller matrix $Y_{n+1}^\top Y_{n+1}$, instead of the original large matrix $\operatorname{Cov}_{n+1}$.
\begin{equation} \label{equ:eigen_decom}
(Y_{n+1}^\top\,Y_{n+1})\,e_{n+1,j} \,=\, \lambda_{n+1,j}\,e_{n+1,j} \quad j = 1,2,\dots,d+1,
\end{equation}
where $e_{n+1,j}$ and $\lambda_{n+1,j}$ are the $j$-th eigenvector and eigenvalue of matrix $Y_{n+1}^\top Y_{n+1}$, respectively. Let $c_{n+1,j} = Y_{n+1} e_{n+1,j}$, and we re-write Equation (\ref{equ:eigen_decom}) as
\begin{equation} \label{equ:RIPCA_end} \begin{aligned}
& Y_{n+1}\,Y_{n+1}^\top\,Y_{n+1}\,e_{n+1,j} \,=\, \lambda_{n+1,j}\,Y_{n+1}\,e_{n+1,j}, \\
& \operatorname{Cov}_{n+1}\,c_{n+1,j} \,=\, \lambda_{n+1,i}\,c_{n+1,j}\;\;\;\;\;\;j = 1,2,\dots,d+1.
\end{aligned} \end{equation}
We thus obtain the updated eigenvectors $\mathbf{C}_{n+1}$ and the corresponding eigenvalues $\Lambda_{n+1}$ of the new covariance matrix $\operatorname{Cov}_{n+1}$. Note that the dimension of the subspace is automatically increased along with the newly added data $\bar{v}_{n+1}$. To guarantee the appearance parameters remain stable, we keep the main principal (\emph{i.e.} top $d$) eigenvectors and eigenvalues while discarding the least significant components.
The above incremental subspace learning algorithm has been widely applied in several vision tasks such as face recognition and image segmentation~\cite{IPCA2,IPCA3,IPCA4}, and also for background modeling in \cite{CCIPCABS,INSUBL,ICA09}. However, the noise observations caused by moving objects or scene variations often disturb the subspace maintenance, \emph{e.g.} the eigenvectors could change dramatically during the processing. Many efforts~\cite{RPCA11}\cite{ding2011bayesian} have been dedicated to improve the robustness of incremental learning by using statistical analysis. Several discriminative learning algorithms~\cite{diana2012background} were also employed to train background classifiers that can be incrementally updated. In this work, we utilize a version of Robust Incremental PCA (RIPCA)~\cite{IPCA1} to cope with the outliers in $\bar{v}_{n+1}$. Note that $\bar{v}_{n+1}$ consists of pixels either from the generated data $\hat{v}_{n+1}$ or real videos, where outliers may exist in some dimensions.
In the traditional PCA learning, the solution is derived by minimizing a least-squared reconstruction error,
\begin{equation}
\min |r_{n+1}|^2\,=\, | \mathbf{C}_{n}\mathbf{C}_{n}^\top \bar{v}_{n+1} - \bar{v}_{n+1} |^2. \label{equ:error}
\end{equation}
Following \cite{IPCA1}, we impose a robustness function $w(t) = \frac{1}{1+(t/\rho)^2}$ over each dimension of $r_{n+1}$, and the target can be re-defined as,
\begin{equation}
\min \sum_j (r^k_{n+1})^2\, \leftarrow \, w(r_{n+1}^k) (r^k_{n+1})^2,
\end{equation}
where the superscript $k$ indicates the $k$-th dimension. The parameter $\rho$ in the robustness function is estimated by
\begin{equation} \label{equ:IRPCA_begin} \begin{aligned}
& \rho\,=\,[\rho^1, \rho^2, \dots, \rho^{|\bar{v}_{n+1}|}]^\top\\
& \rho^k \,=\,\underset{i=1}{\overset{d}{\max}}\,\beta\sqrt{\lambda_{n,i}}\,|\,c_{n,j}^k\,|,\; j = 1, 2, \dots, |\bar{v}_{n+1}|
\end{aligned} \end{equation}
where $\beta$ is a fixed coefficient. The $k$-th dimension of $\rho$ is proportional to the maximal projection of the current eigenvectors on the $k$-th dimension, (\emph{i.e.} $\rho^k$ is weighted by their corresponding eigenvalues). Note that $w(r_{n+1}^k)$ is a function of the residual error which should be calculated for each vector dimension. And the computation cost for $w(r_{n+1}^k)$ can be neglected in the analytical solution.
Accordingly, we can update the observation $\bar{v}_{n+1}$ over each dimension by computing the function $w(r_{n+1}^k)$,
\begin{equation}
\tilde{v}^k_{n+1}\,=\,\sqrt{w(r^k_{n+1})}\,\bar{v}^k_{n+1}.
\label{equ:robust}
\end{equation}
That is, we treat $\tilde{v}_{n+1}$ as the new observation during the procedure of incremental learning.
{\bf (i) Step 2.~~} With the fixed $\mathbf{C}_{n+1}$, we then update the parameters of state variations $A_{n+1}$, $B_{n+1}$. We first estimate the latest state $z_{n+1}$ based on the updated $\mathbf{C}_{n+1}$ as,
\begin{equation} \label{equ:updateAB_begin}
z_{n+1} = \mathbf{C}^{\top}_{n+1} \tilde{v}_{n+1}.
\end{equation}
$A_{n+1}$ can be further calculated, by re-solving the linear problem of a fixed number of latest observed states,
\begin{equation} \label{equ:updateAB_end} \begin{aligned}
A_{n+1}\,[\;z_{n-l+1}\;\cdots\;z_{n}\;]\,=\,[\;z_{n-l+2}\;\cdots\;z_{n+1}\;],
\end{aligned} \end{equation}
where $l$ indicates the number of latest observed states, \emph{i.e.} the span of observations. And similarly, we update $B_{n+1}$ by computing the new reconstruction error $E=[z_{n-l+2}\;\cdots\;z_{n+1}]-A_{n+1}\,[z_{n-l+1}\;\cdots\;z_{n}]$.
\begin{figure}[ptb]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=3.2in]{Robustness.pdf}
\end{center}
\caption{An example to demonstrate the robustness of model maintenance. In the scenario of dynamic water surfaces, we visualize the original and predicted intensities for a fixed position (denoted by the red star), with the blue and red curves, respectively. With our updating scheme, when the position is occluded by a foreground object during from frame $551$ to $632$, the predicted intensities are not disturbed by foreground, \emph{i.e.} the model remains stable.}
\label{fig:robust}
\end{figure}
\begin{algorithm}[ptb]
\KwIn{ Video brick sequence $V = \{v_{1},v_{2},\dots,v_{n}\}$ for every location for the scene. }
\KwOut{Maintained Background models and foreground regions}
\ForAll{locations for the scene}
{
Given the observed video bricks $V$, extract the CS-STLTP descriptor\;
Initialize the subspace by estimating $\mathbf{C}_{n},A_{n},B_{n}$ using Equation (\ref{equ:assumption})-(\ref{equ:dyndim})\;
\For{the newly appearing video brick $v_{n+1}$}
{
(1) Extract the CS-STLTP descriptor for $v_{n+1}$\;
(2) Calculate its state residual $\epsilon_{n}$ and appearances residual $\omega_{n+1}$ by Equation (\ref{equ:appearance}) and (\ref{equ:seg_end})\;
(3) For each pixel of $v_{n+1}$, classify it into foreground or background by thresholding the two residuals with $\epsilon_{n}$, $\omega_{n+1}$\;
(4) Generate the noise-free brick $\hat{v}_{n+1}$ from the current model by Equation (\ref{equ:Syn})\;
(5) Synthesize video brick $\bar{v}_{n+1}$ for model updating\;
(6) Update $\bar{v}_{n+1}$ into $\tilde{v}_{n+1}$ by introducing a robustness function\;
(7) Update the new appearance parameter $\mathbf{C}_{n+1}$ by calculating the covariance matrix $\operatorname{Cov}_{n+1}$ with the learning rate $\alpha$\;
(8) Update the state variation parameters $A_{n+1},\,B_{n+1}$ \;
}
}
\caption{The sketch of the proposed algorithm.}\label{alg:STDS}
\end{algorithm}
We present an empirical study in Fig.~\ref{fig:robust} to demonstrate the effectiveness of this updating method. The video for background modeling includes dynamic water surfaces. Here we visualize the original and predicted intensities for a fixed position (denoted by the red star), with the blue and red curves, respectively. We can observe that the model remains stable against foreground occlusion.
{\em Time complexity analysis.~~} We mainly employ SVD and linear programming in the initial learning. The time complexity of SVD is $O(n^3)$ and the learning time of linear programming is $O(n^2)$. For a certain location, the time complexity of initial learning is $O(n^3) + O(n^2) = O(n^3)$ for each subspace, where $n$ denotes the number of video bricks for model learning. As for online learning, incremental subspace learning and linear programming are utilized. Given a $d$-dimension subspace, the time complexity for component updating (\emph{i.e.} step $1$ of the model maintenance) is $O(dn^2)$. Thus, the total time complexity for online learning is $O(dn^2) + O(l^2)$, where $l$ is the number of states used to solve the linear problem.
We summarize the algorithm sketch of our framework in Algorithm~\ref{alg:STDS}.
\section{Experiments}\label{sec:exp}
In this section, we first introduce the datasets used in the experiments and the parameter settings, then present the experimental results and comparisons. The discussions of system components are proposed at last.
\subsection{Datasets and settings}
We collect a number of challenging videos to validate our approach, which are publicly available or from real surveillance systems. Two of them (AirportHall and TrainStation) from the PETS database\footnote{Downloaded from http://www.cvg.rdg.ac.uk/slides/pets.html.} include crowded pedestrians and moving cast shadows; five highly dynamic scenes \footnote{Downloaded from http://perception.i2r.a-star.edu.sg} include waving curtain active fountain, swaying trees, water surface; the others contain extremely difficult cases such as heavy rain, sudden and gradual light changing. Most of the videos include thousands of frames, and some of the frames are manually annotated as the ground-truth provided by the original databases.
Our algorithm has been adopted in a real video surveillance system and achieves satisfactory performances. The system is capable of processing $15 \sim 20$ frames per second in the resolution $352 \times 288$ pixels. The hardware architecture is an Intel i7 2600 (3.4 GHz) CPU and 8GB RAM desktop computer.
All parameters are fixed in the experiments, including the contrast threshold for CS-STLTP descriptor $\tau=0.2$, the dimension threshold for ARMA model $T_d = 0.5$, $T_{d_\epsilon} = 0.5$, the span of observations for model updating $l = 60$, and the size of bricks $4\times 4\times 5$. For foreground segmentation, the threshold of appearance residual $T_\omega = 3$, update threshold $T_\epsilon = 3$ and $T_\omega = 5$, $T_\epsilon = 4$ for RGB. In the online model maintenance, the coefficient $\beta = 2.3849$, the learning rate $\alpha = 0.05$ for RIPCA.
In the experiments, we use the first $50$ frames of each testing video to initialize our system (i.e. to perform the initial learning), and keep model updated in the rest of sequence. In addition, we utilize a standard post-processing to eliminate areas including less than $20$ pixels. All other competing approaches are executed with the same setting as our approach.
We utilize the F-score as the benchmark metric, which measures the segmentation accuracy by considering both the recall and the precision. The F-score is defined as
\begin{equation}
F\,=\,\frac{2\,TP}{2\,TP\,+\,FP\,+\,FN},
\end{equation}
where TP is true positives (foreground objects), FN false negatives (false background pixels), FP false positive (false foreground pixels).
\begin{figure}[ptb]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=90mm]{PRCurve_5.pdf}
\end{center}
\caption{Experimental results generated by our approach and competing methods on $5$ videos: first row left, the scene including a dynamic curtain and indistinctive foreground objects (\emph{i.e.} having similar appearance with backgrounds); first row right, the scene with heavy rain; second row left, an indoor scene with the sudden lighting changes; second row right, the scene with dynamic water surface; third row, a busy airport. The precision-recall (PR) curve is introduced as the benchmark measurement for all the $6$ algorithms.}\label{fig:PR}
\end{figure}
\subsection{Experimental results}
\begin{small}
\begin{small}
\begin{table*}[ptb]
\center
\caption{Quantitative results and comparisons on the $10$ complex videos using the F-score ($\%$) measurement. The last two columns report the results of our method using either RGB or CS-STLTP as the feature.}
\begin{tabular}{ccccccccc}
\addlinespace
\toprule
Scene & \tabincell{c}{GMM\cite{GGMM}} & \tabincell{c}{Im-GMM\cite{ZGMM}} & \tabincell{c}{Online-AR\cite{PDTM}} & \tabincell{c}{JDR\cite{Bayesian}} & \tabincell{c}{SVM\cite{OLISVM}} & \tabincell{c}{PKDE\cite{SILTP}} & \tabincell{c}{STDM(RGB)} & \tabincell{c}{STDM(Ftr.)} \\
\midrule
\multicolumn{1}{l}{1\# Airport} & 46.99 & 47.36 & 62.72 & 60.23 & 65.35 & 68.14 & \textbf{70.52} & 66.40 \\
\multicolumn{1}{l}{2\# Floating Bottle} & 57.91 & 57.77 & 43.79 & 45.64 & 47.87 & 59.57 & 69.04 & \textbf{78.17} \\
\multicolumn{1}{l}{3\# Waving Curtain} & 62.75 & 74.58 & 77.86 & 72.72 & 77.34 & 78.01 & \textbf{79.74} & 74.93 \\
\multicolumn{1}{l}{4\# Active Fountain} & 52.77 & 60.11 & 70.41 & 68.53 & 74.94 & 76.33 & 76.85 & \textbf{85.46} \\
\multicolumn{1}{l}{5\# Heavy Rain} & 71.11 & 81.54 & 78.68 & 75.88 & \textbf{82.62} & 76.71 & 79.35 & 75.29 \\
\multicolumn{1}{l}{6\# Sudden Light} & 47.11 & 51.37 & 37.30 & 52.26 & 47.61 & 52.63 & 51.56 & \textbf{74.57} \\
\multicolumn{1}{l}{7\# Gradual Light} & 51.10 & 50.12 & 13.16 & 47.48 & 62.44 & 54.86 & 54.84 & \textbf{77.41} \\
\multicolumn{1}{l}{8\# Train Station} & 65.12 & 68.80 & 36.01 & 57.68 & 61.79 & 67.05 & \textbf{73.43} & 66.35 \\
\multicolumn{1}{l}{9\# Swaying Trees} & 19.51 & 23.25 & 63.54 & 45.61 & 24.38 & 42.54 & 43.71 & \textbf{75.89} \\
\multicolumn{1}{l}{10\# Water Surface} & 79.54 & 86.01 & 77.31 & 84.27 & 83.13 & 74.30 & 88.54 & \textbf{88.68} \\
\multicolumn{1}{l}{Average} & 55.39 & 59.56 & 57.02 & 60.23 & 59.79 & 63.08 & 68.75 & \textbf{76.31} \\
\bottomrule
\end{tabular}
\label{tab:F-score}
\end{table*}
\end{small}
\end{small}
{\em Experimental results}. We compare the proposed method (STDM) with six state-of-the-art online background subtraction algorithms including Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM)~\cite{GGMM} as baseline, improved GMM~\cite{ZGMM}\footnote{Available at http://dparks.wikidot.com/background-subtraction}, online auto-regression model~\cite{PDTM}, non-parametric model with scale-invariant local patterns~\cite{SILTP}, discriminative model using generalized Struct 1-SVM~\cite{OLISVM}\footnote{Available at http://www.cs.mun.ca/$\sim$gong/Pages/Research.html}, and the Bayesian joint domain-range (JDR) model~\cite{Bayesian}\footnote{Available at http://www.cs.cmu.edu/$\sim$yaser/}. In the comparisons, for the methods~\cite{GGMM,ZGMM,OLISVM,Bayesian} we use their released codes, and implement the methods~\cite{SILTP,PDTM} by ourselves. The F-scores ($\%$) over all $10$ videos are reported in Table~\ref{tab:F-score}, where the last two columns report results of our method using either RGB or CS-STLTP as the feature. Note that for the result using the RGB feature we represent each video brick by concatenating the RGB values of all its pixels. We also exhibit the results and comparisons using the precision-recall (PR) curves, as shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:PR}. Due to space limitation, we only show results on $5$ videos. From the results, we can observe that the proposed method outperforms the other methods in most videos in general. For the scenes with highly dynamic backgrounds (\emph{e.g.}, the $\# 2$ $\#5$ and $\# 10$ scenes), the improvements made by our method are more than $10\%$. And the system enables us to well handle the indistinctive foreground objects (\emph{i.e.} small objects or background-like objects in the $\# 1$, $\# 3$ scenes). Moreover, we make significant improvements (\emph{i.e.} $15\% \sim 25\%$) in the scene \#6 and \#7 including both sudden and gradual lighting changes. A number of sampled results of background subtraction are exhibited in Fig.~\ref{fig:results_backsub}.
The benefit of using the proposed CS-STLTP feature is clearly validated by observing the results shown in Table~\ref{tab:F-score} and Fig.~\ref{fig:results_backsub}. In general, our approach simply using RGB values can achieve satisfying performances for the common scenes, \emph{e.g.}, with fair appearance and motion changes, while the CS-SILTP operator can better handle highly dynamic variations (\emph{e.g.} sudden illumination changing, rippling water). In addition, we also compare CS-STLTP with the existing scale invariant descriptor SILTP proposed in \cite{SILTP}. We reserve all settings in our approach except replacing the feature by SILTP, and achieve the average precision over all $10$ videos: $69.70\%$. This result shows that CS-STLTP is very suitable and effective for the video brick representation.
\begin{figure*}[ptb]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=140mm]{ResultTable_V.pdf}
\end{center}
\caption{Sampled results of background subtraction generated by our approach (using RGB or CS-STLTP as the feature and RIPCA as the update strategy) and other competing methods.}
\label{fig:results_backsub}
\end{figure*}
\subsection{Discussion}\label{sec:exp_dis}
Furthermore, we conduct the following empirical studies to justify the parameter determinations and settings of our approach.
\begin{figure}[ptb]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=40mm]{LearningRate.pdf}
\includegraphics[width=40mm]{FeatureTau.pdf}
\end{center}
\caption{Discussion of parameter selection: (i) learning rate $\alpha$ for model maintenance (in (a)) and (ii) the contrast threshold of CS-STLTP feature $\tau$ (in (b)). In each figure, the horizontal axis represents the different parameter values; the three lines in different colors denote, respectively, the false positive (FP), false negative (FN), and the sum of FP and FN.}\label{fig:discuss_para}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure}[ptb]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=2.6in]{BrickSize.pdf}
\caption{Empirical study for the size of video brick in our approach. We carry on the experiments on the $10$ videos with different brick size while keeping the rest settings. The vertical axis represents the average precisions of background subtraction and the horizontal represents the different sizes of video bricks with respect to background decomposition.}\label{fig:bricksize}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
{\em Efficiency.} Like other online-learning background models, there is a trade-off between the model stability and maintenance efficiency. The corresponding parameter in our method is the learning rate $\alpha$. We tune $\alpha$ in the range of $0 \sim 0.3$ by fixing the other model parameters and visualize the quantitative results of background subtraction, as shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:discuss_para}(a). From the results, we can observe this parameter is insensitive in range $0 \sim 0.1$ in our model. In practice, once the scene is extremely busy and crowded, it could be set as a relative small value to keep the model stable.
{\em Feature effectiveness.} The contrast threshold $\tau$ is the only parameter in CS-STLTP operator, which affects the power of feature to character spatio-temporal information within video bricks. From the empirical results of parameter tuning, as shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:discuss_para} (b), we can observe that the appropriate range for $\tau$ is $0.15 \sim 0.25$. In practice, the model could become sensitive to noise by setting a very small value of $\tau$ (say $\tau < 0.15$), and too large $\tau$ (say $\tau > 0.25$) might reduce the accuracy on detecting foreground regions with homogeneous appearances.
{\em Size of video brick.} One may be interested in how the system performance is affected by the size of video brick for background decomposition, so that we present an empirical study on different sizes of video bricks in Fig. \ref{fig:bricksize}. We observe that the best result is achieved with the certain brick size of $4 \times 4 \times 3$, and the results with the sizes of $4 \times 4 \times 1$ and $4 \times 4 \times 5$ are also satisfied. As of very small bricks (\emph{e.g.} $1 \times 1 \times 3$ ), few spatio-temporal statistics are captured and the models may have problems on handling scene variations. The bricks of large sizes (\emph{e.g.} $8 \times 8 \times 5$ ) carry too much information, and their subspaces cannot be effectively generated by the linear ARMA model. The experimental results are also accordant with our motivations in Section I. In practice, we can flexibly set the size according to the resolutions of surveillance videos.
{\em Model initialization.} Our method is not sensitive to the number of observed frames in the initial stage of subspace generation. We test the different numbers, say $30$, $40$, $60$, on two typical surveillance scenes, i.e. the Airport Hall (scene $\# 1$) and the Train Station (scene $\# 8$). The F-score outputs show the deviations with different numbers of initial frames are very small, e.g. less than $0.2$. In general, we require the observed scenes to be relatively clean for initialization, although a few objects that move across are allowed.
\section{Conclusion}\label{sec:conclu}
This paper studies an effective method for background subtraction, addressing the all challenges in real surveillance scenarios. In the method, we learn and maintain the dynamic texture models within spatio-temporal video patches (\emph{i.e.} video bricks). Sufficient experiments as well as empirical analysis are presented to validate the advantages of our method.
In the future, we plan to improve the method in two aspects. (1) Some efficient tracking algorithms can be employed into the framework to better distinguish the foreground objects. (2) The GPU-based implementation can be developed to process each part of the scene in parallel, and it would probably significantly improve the system efficiency.
\bibliographystyle{unsrt}
|
\section{Introduction}
It is generally assumed that the slow but massive outflows of gas and dust from cool luminous AGB stars are accelerated by radiation pressure on dust grains. The total momentum of the photons emitted by these stars easily matches, or even exceeds, the typical momentum of the stellar winds, and solid particles with the right optical properties can be very efficient in gaining momentum from stellar photons through absorption and scattering processes.
Observationally, grain materials are usually identified through their characteristic lattice modes in the mid-IR, e.g. the well-known silicate features at about 10 and 18$\,\mu$m which are due to stretching and bending modes in the SiO$_4$ tetrahedron. Mid-IR spectra of AGB stars give valuable insights into the complex dust chemistry in the circumstellar envelopes \citep[see e.g.][for an overview]{dor10,agbgrain}. For determining which grains may contribute to wind acceleration, however, important constraints come from the visual and near-infrared wavelength regions which are crucial for the energy and momentum budget of the atmosphere since the radiative flux maximum of the star is at about $1-2\,\mu$m.
This paper is the third in a series dedicated to identifying wind-driving dust species in M-type AGB stars by using a combination of different dynamical models and observational data. In the first paper \citep{bladh12} we focused on dynamical constraints for material properties, using a simple parameterised description of the dust component in frequency-dependent radiation-hydrodynamical models for pulsating atmospheres and winds. Since dust temperatures are strongly affected by the wavelength-dependence of the grain opacities (causing greenhouse or inverse greenhouse effects), we found that many dust species cannot condense sufficiently close to the star to trigger or accelerate a wind. In particular, Fe-bearing silicates suffer from a severe greenhouse effect as a result of the steep slope of the absorption coefficient at near-IR wavelengths, moving their condensation zone much further away from the star than for Fe-free magnesium silicates, which was also demonstrated by \cite{woi06fe}. This effect, by definition, does not appear in wind models with grey radiative transfer, leading to a severe underestimation of the condensation distance for Fe-bearing silicates.
In the second paper \citep{bladh13} we presented synthetic spectra and visual and near-IR photometry resulting from these parameterised models (set P) and from more detailed wind models driven by photon scattering on Mg$_2$SiO$_4$ grains (set D), first presented in \cite{hof08bg}. Comparing the synthetic photometry with observations of M-type AGB stars we found that the latter models (set D) give a good agreement. In particular, they can reproduce large variations of the $(V-K)$ colour during the pulsation cycle due to abundance variations of TiO. This is a strong indication that the circumstellar envelopes of M-type AGB stars, and, consequently, the wind-driving dust grains are rather transparent, excluding true absorption by dust as the main source of momentum.
Results from the parameterised models (set P) support this conclusion, which makes photon scattering on Fe-free silicates a prime candidate for the wind driving mechanism. In order for the grains to be efficient at scattering this scenario requires particles of sizes in the range of $0.1-1\,\mu$m. Recently \cite{norr12} claimed the detection of grains with sizes of $\sim0.3\,\mu$m in the close circumstellar environment of 3 AGB stars, using multi-wavelength aperture-masking polarimetric interferometry.
Given the success in reproducing dynamic and photometric properties for the small sample of wind models driven by photon scattering on Mg$_2$SiO$_4$ grains, we here present the first extensive set of time-dependent wind models for M-type AGB stars based on this mechanism. The aim of this study is to demonstrate that outflows can be produced not only for a few selected cases, but also for models with a wide range of stellar parameters. We also investigate how the observable properties of these models are affected by various parameters, and we compare our results with observations, in particular dynamic properties, visual and near-IR photometry, and mid-IR spectra.
The paper is organised as follows: in Sect.~\ref{s_par} we introduce the basic physical assumptions and input parameters for the dynamical models of M-type AGB stars. In Secs.~\ref{s_dyn}-\ref{s_mir} we evaluate the wind properties, the visual and near-IR photometry and the mid-IR spectra produced by these models and compare with observed values. In Sect.~\ref{s_gtemp} we explore constraints on the position of the wind acceleration zone and in Sect.~\ref{s_sum} we provide a summary of our conclusions.
\section{Modelling method and parameters}
\label{s_par}
The models presented in this paper are similar to model set D in \cite{bladh13}, corresponding to the models first presented in \cite{hof08bg}. We only give a short summary of their main ingredients here. For more detailed information concerning the dynamical models and the \textit{a posteriori} radiative transfer, see previous articles \citep{hof03,hof08bg,bladh12,bladh13} and references therein.
\begin{table*}
\caption{The combinations of input parameters for the models of M-type AGB stars, sorted according to luminosity. The columns list stellar mass $M_\star$, stellar luminosity $L_\star$, effective temperature $T_\star$ of the star, pulsation period $P$, piston velocity amplitude $\Delta u_{\mathrm{p}}$ and the assumed seed particle abundance $n_{\mathrm{gr}}/n_{\mathrm{H}}$. The pulsation period is derived from the period-luminosity relation presented in \cite{fei89}.}
\label{t_grid}
\centering
\begin{tabular}{c c r c c c l}
\hline\hline
Model series & $M_\star$ & $L_\star$ & $T_\star$ & $P(L_\star)$ & $\Delta u_{p}$ & $\log n_{\mathrm{gr}}/n_{\mathrm{H}}$\\
& $[M_{\odot}$] & [$L_{\odot}$] & [K] & [d] & [km/s] & [a, b, c, d]\\
\hline
L50 & 1 & 5000 & 2600--3000 & 310 & 3.0, 4.0 & $-16.0$, $-15.5$, $-15.0$, $-14.5$\\
L70 & 1 & 7000 & 2600--3100& 395 & 3.0, 4.0 & $-16.0$, $-15.5$, $-15.0$, $-14.5$\\
L10 & 1 & 10000 & 2600--3200 & 525 & 2.0, 3.0 & $-16.0$, $-15.5$, $-15.0$, $-14.5$\\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\end{table*}
The variable structures of the atmospheres and winds are produced by simultaneously solving the equations of hydrodynamics, frequency-dependent radiative transfer and time-dependent grain growth, assuming spherical symmetry. The stellar pulsations are simulated by adopting sinusoidal variations of velocity and luminosity at the inner boundary of the atmosphere. When calculating the radiative acceleration of Mg$_2$SiO$_4$ particles, grain-size dependent opacities are used, taking into account both scattering and absorption effects.
Dust formation is considered as a two step process, starting with the rapid formation of tiny seed nuclei with sizes in the nanometre range, followed the much slower growth of the grains through condensation of material from the gas phase, on time scales comparable to atmosphere and wind dynamics. Currently there is no well-established nucleation theory for oxygen-rich atmospheres, describing the formation of the seed particles. Fundamental questions, e.g. their composition (which may differ from the bulk of material building up the grains) are still a matter of debate. Our modelling of dust formation follows \cite{gail99}, assuming that the growth rate of Mg$_2$SiO$_4$ is determined by the addition of SiO molecules to the grain surface, and using a parameter $n_{\mathrm{gr}}/n_{\mathrm{H}}$ that sets the number of seed particles per hydrogen atom\footnote{In contrast, nucleation in carbon-rich stars is often described by classical nucleation theory, assuming that the seed particle and microscopic grains consist of the same material, i.e. amorphous carbon. The values used here for the parameter $n_{\mathrm{gr}}/n_{\mathrm{H}}$ are comparable to values found in carbon star models.}. These seed particles will start to grow when the thermodynamic conditions are favourable. The equation describing the time-dependent growth of Mg$_2$SiO$_4$ grains is discussed in \cite{bladh13}. Since we assume that the formation of seed particles precedes grain growth (i.e. no new seed nuclei are formed) grain size will be uniform in a given mass layer. Because of changing conditions in the atmosphere and wind, however, grain sizes will differ from layer to layer and change with time.
Each dynamic model is represented by a sequence of snapshots of the radial structures, covering typically hundreds of pulsation periods. From this long sequence we select a series of snapshots, equidistant in phase, during three consecutive pulsation periods. For these snapshots we produce spectra and photometry in an \textit{a posteriori} radiative transfer calculation. The synthetic spectra are computed with opacities from the COMA code \citep{ari00} and mean synthetic photometry is calculated by phase-averaging over the pulsation cycle.
The current study includes 139 solar-mass models of M-type AGB stars, with effective temperatures ranging from 2600\, to 3200\,K. Three different luminosities have been used: $5000\,$L$_{\odot}$, $7000\,$L$_{\odot}$ and $10000\,$L$_{\odot}$. These parameters were chosen to represent common M-type AGB stars, according to stellar evolution models. The pulsation period controlling the variations at the inner boundary is derived from the period-luminosity relation presented in \cite{fei89} and the piston velocity amplitude $\Delta u_{\mathrm{p}}$ ranges between 2-4 km/s, depending on luminosity. This results in shock amplitudes of about 15-20 km/s in the inner atmosphere. Table~\ref{t_grid} shows the combination of input parameters of the models, sorted by luminosity. For each fixed luminosity, the effective temperature, piston velocity amplitude and seed particle abundance are varied according to the values listed.
\section{Wind properties}
\label{s_dyn}
\begin{figure}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{plotifwindsb.pdf}
\caption{Dynamic behaviour of the models as a function of input parameters. The red rectangles indicate models with a stellar wind, the blue rectangles indicate models where no wind forms, and the grey rectangles indicate combinations of parameters not tested or where the models fail for numerical reason. For each combination of luminosity and effective temperature the seed particle abundance and piston velocity are varied as indicated by the inset box. See Table~\ref{t_grid} for the different values of seed particle abundance $n_{\mathrm{gr}}/n_{\mathrm{H}}$ (a-d).}
\label{f_ifwind}
\end{figure}
A schematic overview of the dynamical properties of the available models is shown in Fig.\ref{f_ifwind}. The range in effective temperature and luminosity is listed on the x-axis and y-axis, respectively. Each subset consists of twelve boxes and is organised such that the piston velocity is increasing upwards and the seed particle abundance is increasing towards the right. The red boxes represent models that develop a stellar wind, the blue boxes represent models where no wind forms and the grey boxes indicate combinations of parameters not tested or where the models fail for numerical reasons. It is clear from this plot that the dynamical models can produce outflows for a wide range of stellar parameters, although it is generally more difficult to drive winds for high effective temperatures and low luminosities. Judging from these trends, models with lower effective temperature and/or higher luminosity than in this current sample can be expected to produce outflows.\footnote{The current set of models for M-type AGB stars does not lead to any wind models with episodic outflows, whereas such models are found in the grid for C-type AGB stars of \cite{matt10}, as discussed by \cite{erik14}. A possible reason for the different wind behaviour is that dust particles with a large absorption cross-section in the visual and near-IR (e.g. amorphous carbon) cause back-warming effects in the atmosphere. This back-warming can influence the dust formation in the layers below and consequently the dynamics. If the wind-driving dust species is very transparent in the visual and near-IR (e.g. magnesium silicates) and acting predominately through photon scattering, then this feedback through back-warming will not occur.}
While the effects of certain parameters are rather straight-forward ($L_*$, $T_*$), or have been discussed in other papers ($\Delta u_{\mathrm{p}}$), the seed particle abundance needs some further discussion. The range of values for this parameter is limited on both ends since photon scattering as a wind-driving mechanism requires grains in a certain size range \citep[see][for a discussion]{hof08toy}. Fewer seeds make the growth of individual grains more efficient (less competition for material), but may actually lead to a smaller collective opacity if the grains grow beyond the optimal size range. More seeds lead to stronger competition for condensable material, resulting in smaller grains. This effect is demonstrated in Fig.~\ref{f_gsize}, showing the grain radius averaged over pulsation cycle in the outermost layers of the dynamical models that produce a wind, sorted according to seed particle abundance. The degrees of condensed silicon (Si) in the models that produce outflows are shown in Fig.~\ref{f_fc}, with typical values ranging between 10-25\%, corresponding to dust-to-gas mass ratios of about $10^{-3}$. This is in reasonable agreement with recent results by \cite{khou14} for W Hya, who find that about a one third of Si is condensed into grains. According to our models the degree of condensed magnesium will be about twice as much as for Si since Mg$_2$SiO$_4$ has two magnesium atoms per silicon atom and the element abundances of Si and Mg are comparable.
\begin{figure}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{gsize.pdf}
\caption{Grain sizes (averaged over pulsation cycle) at the outer boundary of the models that produce a stellar wind, sorted according to different seed particle abundance $n_{\mathrm{gr}}/n_{\mathrm{H}}$.}
\label{f_gsize}
\qquad\\
\centering
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{fc.pdf}
\caption{The fraction of Si atoms condensed into grains, averaged over pulsation cycle at the outer boundary of the models that produce a stellar wind.}
\label{f_fc}
\end{figure}
A comparison of wind velocities and mass-loss rates of the models with corresponding empirical data for M-type AGB stars, derived from observations of several CO-lines, is shown in Fig.~\ref{f_dyn2}. The agreement with observations is good, not the least considering that this set of models does not correspond to a stellar population, but rather a grid of input parameters where not all combinations of parameters are equally likely. Both high and low mass-loss rates are reproduced, and higher mass-loss rates could probably be reached by increasing the stellar luminosity of the wind models further.
The four panels of Fig.~\ref{f_dyn2} show the same data but the models are colour-coded in different ways to illustrate the effects of different input parameters. The top left panel of Fig. \ref{f_dyn2} shows the dynamical properties of the wind models, colour-coded according to luminosity. The models with different values for the luminosity form bands where higher luminosity correlates with higher mass-loss rates. If we instead plot the dynamical properties colour-coded by seed particle abundance (lower left panel), the models form bands correlating more with wind velocity. In right panels of Fig. \ref{f_dyn2} we also plot the models sorted according to effective temperatures and piston velocities, but we see no distinct trends in wind properties with respect to these parameters.
\begin{figure*}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=9cm]{dyn4.pdf}
\includegraphics[width=9cm]{dyn2.pdf}
\includegraphics[width=9cm]{dyn3.pdf}
\includegraphics[width=9cm]{dyn1.pdf}
\caption{Observed mass-loss rates vs. wind velocities of M-type AGB stars \citep[][plus signs]{hans02,gondel03} and the corresponding properties of all models which develop a wind (indicated in red in Fig.~\ref{f_ifwind}). All panels show the same data but with different colour coding according to stellar luminosity (upper left), effective temperature (upper right), seed particle abundance (lower left) and piston velocity amplitude (lower right). The stellar mass is one solar mass for all models.}
\label{f_dyn2}
\end{figure*}
\section{Visual and near-IR photometry}
\label{s_nir}
Dust-driven winds can be accelerated by both absorption and scattering of stellar photons on dust grains, but scattering is only significant if the grains grow to adequate sizes. If true absorption is the dominant source of the radiative acceleration then significant circumstellar reddening will occur; the dusty envelope will veil the molecular features in the visual wavelength region and emit a significant infrared excess. If scattering is the dominant source of the momentum there will be much less circumstellar reddening; changes in the molecular features during the pulsation cycle will be visible at visual wavelengths and there will not be much infrared excess, even though dust is present. Since the visual and near-IR spectra are strongly sensitive to the wind-driving mechanism, i.e. the optical properties of the wind-driving dust species, we use the colours $(J-K)$ and $(V-K)$ when comparing model results with observational data. The sources of the observational data sets used here are described in detail in \cite{bladh13}.
\begin{table}
\caption{Input parameters for the dynamical models resulting in the photometric variations shown in Fig.~\ref{f_grid4}.}
\label{t_grid2}
\centering
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c}
\hline\hline
$L_\star$ & $T_\star$ & $\Delta u_{p}$ & $\log n_{\mathrm{gr}}/n_{\mathrm{H}}$ & Line\\
$L_{\odot}$ & [K] & [km/s] & & colour \\
\hline
5000 & 2600 & 4.0 & $-15.0$ & red\\
5000 & 2800 & 4.0 & $-15.0$ & red\\\
7000 & 2600 & 3.0 & $-15.0$ & green\\
7000 & 2800 & 3.0 & $-15.0$ & green\\
7000 & 3000 & 3.0 & $-15.0$ & green\\
10000 & 2600 & 2.0 & $-15.0$ & blue\\
10000 & 2800 & 2.0 & $-15.0$ & blue\\
10000 & 3000 & 2.0 & $-15.0$ & blue\\
10000 & 3000 & 3.0 & $-15.5$ & blue\\
10000 & 3200 & 2.0 & $-15.5$ & blue\\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\end{table}
\begin{figure}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{grid11a.pdf}
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{grid11b.pdf}
\caption{Photometric variations during a pulsation cycle in $(J-K)$ vs. $(V-K)$. The black loops show photometric variations derived from sine fits of observed light-curves for a set of M-type miras (R Car, R Hya, R Oct, R Vir, RR Sco, T Col and T Hor) and the coloured loops show synthetic photometric variation from a few selected models (see Table~\ref{t_grid2}). For the observed miras we adopted photometric data in the visual from \citet{Eggen75a} and \citet{men67} and complemented those with the near-IR data published by \citet{WhiMF00}. The synthetic loops are calculated from sine fits of the light-curves in the same way as the observational data. See \cite{bladh13} for more details concerning the sinefit of observed light curves. The bottom panel shows the same data as the top panel, but zoomed in. The observations in grey (plus signs) are presented in Fig.~\ref{f_grid2}.}
\label{f_grid4}
\centering
\quad\\
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{spec13.pdf}
\caption{Spectral energy distribution as a function of wavelength for a model with input parameters \mbox{$M=1\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$}, \mbox{$L=5000\,\mathrm{L}_{\odot}$}, \mbox{$T_{*}=2800\,$K}, \mbox{$u_\mathrm{p}=4\,$km/s}, and \mbox{$\log n_{\mathrm{gr}}/n_{\mathrm{H}}=14.5$}. The original spectrum is shown in black and the coloured curves show spectra calculated without TiO opacities (red) and H$_2$O opacities (blue), indicating which photometric bands will be affected by changes in the corresponding features.}
\label{f_spectio}
\end{figure}
AGB stars are variable stars with photometric properties that change with phase. Realistic dynamical models should be able to reproduce this photometric variation during the pulsation cycle. In Fig.~\ref{f_grid4} we plot the synthetic colour $(J-K)$ vs. $(V-K)$ for a few selected models during a pulsation cycle, together with phase-dependent colours constructed from sine fits of observed light curves \citep[see][for more details]{bladh13}. These photometric variations form loops in the colour-colour diagram, with different positions, shapes and tilts. For M-type AGB stars, both the synthetic and observed colour loops are characterised by large variations in $(V-K)$ and small variations in $(J-K)$, as can be seen in Fig.~\ref{f_grid4}. The colour $(V-K)$ reaches its peak value during luminosity minimum, followed by a trough during luminosity maximum. A closer examination of the synthetic spectra reveals that the large variations in $(V-K)$ during a pulsation cycle are caused by a change in the abundance of molecules (TiO, see Fig.~\ref{f_spectio}), and not by changes in the amount of dust present \citep{bladh13}. This is a strong indication that the wind-driving dust species in M-type AGB stars are quite transparent in the visual and near-IR, otherwise these variations would not be dominated by molecular features.
Looking at Fig.~\ref{f_grid4}, it is clear that phase-averaged colours will be affected by both the position of the loops in the colour-colour diagram and the variations in colour during a pulsation cycle. Fig.~\ref{f_grid2} shows phase-averaged synthetic colours (filled squares), as well as observed colours for both M-type (grey and red plus signs) and C-type AGB stars (green plus signs). The synthetic colours are characterised by blue values in $(J-K)$, especially compared to values of C-type AGB stars, with small differences between the individual dynamical models. There is a strong correlation between the effective temperatures of the models and the values of $(J-K)$, as can be seen in the top right panel of Fig.~\ref{f_grid2}. This is probably because the temperature of the star has a strong impact on the water features \mbox{(see Fig.~\ref{f_spectio})}.
The phase-averaged synthetic $(V-K)$ colours show large differences between individual models. The values of the mean $(V-K)$ colours are mostly determined by the range of variation during the pulsation cycle, i.e. how far the loops extend to the blue side of the diagram. As mentioned above, the variation in visual fluxes is determined by changes in TiO, which in turn reflects changes in temperature during the pulsation cycle. The stronger the temperature variations, the wider the loops, resulting in bluer average $(V-K)$ colours.
The conclusion we can draw from Fig.~\ref{f_grid2} is that the mean synthetic colours reproduce well the observed colours from field M-type AGB stars \citep{men67} and the bulk of the observed values from Bulge miras \citep{gbmiras}, especially the large spread in $(V-K)$. The observed colours from Bulge miras show a much larger spread in $(J-K)$ than the synthetic colours, but this could partly be due to metallicity effects and the fact that we assume solar abundances of C and O in the models. A higher C/O-ratio (closer to 1 than the 0.48 that we assume) should give redder values of $(V-K)$ and $(J-K)$, judging from hydrostatic model atmospheres.
\begin{figure*}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=9cm]{grid1.pdf}
\includegraphics[width=9cm]{grid2.pdf}
\includegraphics[width=9cm]{grid4.pdf}
\includegraphics[width=9cm]{grid3.pdf}
\caption{Observed and mean synthetic colours $(J-K)$ vs. $(V-K)$. The observational data (plus signs) is compiled from different sources: Galactic Bulge miras \citep[grey]{gbmiras}, field M-type LPVs \citep[red]{men67}, and C-rich giants \citep[green]{b01cstars}. The model data (filled squares) is from models which develop a wind, as indicated in red in Fig.~\ref{f_ifwind}. All panels show the same data but with different colour coding according to stellar luminosity (upper left), effective temperature (upper right), seed particle abundance (lower left) and piston velocity (lower right). The stellar mass is one solar mass for all models. Most of the observational data are single epoch measurements, whereas the synthetic colours are means over the pulsation cycle.}
\label{f_grid2}
\end{figure*}
\section{Mid-IR spectra}
\label{s_mir}
An issue with the current wind models is that, although they produce dynamical properties and photometry in the visual and near-IR in agreement with observations (see Secs.~\ref{s_dyn} and \ref{s_nir}), they do not show the prominent silicate features at 10~$\mu$m and 18~$\mu$m that are observed in many oxygen-rich AGB stars. These silicate features have been identified as belonging to magnesium-iron silicates, such as olivine ([Mg,Fe]$_2$SiO$_4$) and pyroxene ([Mg,Fe]SiO$_3$), and are caused by stretching and bending resonances in the SiO$_4$-tetrahedron.
The optical properties of Fe-free silicates offer an explanation as to why the synthetic spectra do not show these prominent features. In the wavelength region where AGB stars emit most of their flux the absorption cross-section of magnesium silicates is very low, in particular compared to the spectral features at 10~$\mu$m and 18~$\mu$m, so the heating of the grains by stellar light is moderately efficient. \mbox{Fig. \ref{f_flux}} shows the absorbed and emitted light for Mg$_2$SiO$_4$ grains (black curves), assuming a geometrically diluted radiative flux from a hydrostatic atmosphere (with stellar parameters typical of an M-type AGB star \mbox{$M=1\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$, $L=5000\,\mathrm{L}_{\odot}$ and $T_{*}=2800\,$K)} and a dust temperature of \mbox{$T_{\mathrm{d}}=1000\,$K}. The energy balance is set mostly in the mid-IR wavelength region and the grains cool efficiently. This is the reason why such grains can form close to the stellar surface, but it also leads to a rapidly falling dust temperature in the wind.
\begin{figure}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{fluxop.pdf}
\caption{Absorbed and emitted flux, $Q_{\mathrm{abs}}(\lambda)F_{\lambda}$ and $Q_{\mathrm{abs}}(\lambda)B_{\lambda}$, for two different grain materials, Mg$_2$SiO$_4$ (black) and MgFeSiO$_4$ (red). The absorbed light is calculated using a geometrically diluted radiation field from a hydrostatic atmosphere (at 2\,R$_*$ for Mg$_2$SiO$_4$ and at 10\,R$_*$ for MgFeSiO$_4$) with stellar parameters typical of an M-type AGB star \mbox{($M=1\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$, $L=5000\,\mathrm{L}_{\odot}$ and $T_{*}=2800\,$K)}. The emitted light is calculated using a Planckian source function at a grain temperature of \mbox{$T_{\mathrm{d}}=1000\,$K}. The optical data for Mg$_2$SiO$_4$ is from \cite{jag03} and the optical data for MgFeSiO$_4$ is from \cite{dor95}. We note that the local radiation field in the wind-acceleration zone will be more pronounced in the mid-IR region than what is shown here because of the addition of the emitted light from the dust component.}
\label{f_flux}
\end{figure}
In order to produce silicate features, the grain temperature needs to fall less rapidly with distance from the star than for pure Mg$_2$SiO$_4$ grains. Fig. \ref{f_flux} indicates that the inclusion of Fe in the silicates will help to achieve this; for MgFeSiO$_4$ grains (red curves) light is mostly absorbed in the near-IR wavelength region and then emitted in mid-IR region. However, because of the increased near-IR absorption Fe-bearing silicates can only become thermally stable further away from the star. Simple estimates and results from dynamical models with frequency-dependent radiative transfer predict that silicates with significant Fe content (e.g. MgFeSiO$_4$) become stable at \mbox{$5-10\,R_*$} \citep{woi06fe,hof08toy,bladh12}. \cite{woi06fe} investigated the growth of inhomogeneous dust grains, composed of a mixture of Mg$_2$SiO$_4$, SiO$_2$, Al$_2$O$_3$, TiO$_2$, and solid Fe in a stellar outflow. He found that once Fe inclusion is possible, it will control the temperature of the inhomogeneous dust grains and act as a thermostat, keeping the grain temperature just below the sublimation limit. The amount of included Fe is thereby adjusted in a self-regulating process.
To test this scenario we use a snapshot of the radial structure from a dynamical model where the wind is driven by photon scattering on Mg$_2$SiO$_4$ grains. In the \textit{a posteriori} radiative transfer calculations we set a lower limit on the grain temperature at 800\,K or 500\,K, as if the grains contained impurities that would keep them warm. The top panel of \mbox{Fig. \ref{f_temp}} shows the original temperature structure for the Mg$_2$SiO$_4$ particles, as well as the cases where a minimum dust temperature of 800\,K and 500\,K is set. The resulting spectra are shown in the top panel of \mbox{Fig. \ref{f_spec}}. It is clear from the prominent silicate features produced in the latter cases that the missing spectral features are not caused by a low abundance of silicate dust in the dynamical models, but rather a too low grain temperature. Keeping the grains warm results in silicate emission features. The warmer the grains are, the more prominent the features.
As mentioned above, a way to increase the grain temperature is to include impurities of Fe in the Mg$_2$SiO$_4$ grains. This can be simulated by considering dust particles with a core of Mg$_2$SiO$_4$ and a thin mantle of MgFeSiO$_4$, as if a small fraction of Fe had condensed onto the surface of pure magnesium silicate grains.\footnote{It is possible to introduce this modification in the \textit{a posteriori} radiative transfer since the inclusion of a small amount of other materials into these particles should not alter the overall structure of the models significantly; transparent materials will not have enough radiative cross-section to alter the energy balance and opaque materials are only thermally stable further out in the wind.} We determine the temperature of these grains through radiative equilibrium, assuming that the addition of a thin mantle MgFeSiO$_4$ will not significantly change the structure of the dynamical model. In the \textit{a posteriori} spectral calculation we replace the temperature structure and the optical properties of the Mg$_2$SiO$_4$ grains with the corresponding properties for the core-mantle grains from the point where they are thermally stable. We assume this to be at the distance from the star where the temperature of the core-mantle grains drops below 1000\,K (approximately the temperature where magnesium-iron silicates will condense). The resulting temperature structure for three different mantle sizes (1\%, 5\% and 10\% of the radius corresponding to 3\%, 15\% and 30\% of the volume) are shown in \mbox{Fig. \ref{f_temp}} and the corresponding spectra are shown in the bottom panel of \mbox{Fig. \ref{f_spec}}. We note that dust particles with a thin mantle of MgFeSiO$_4$ may be thermally stable quite close to the stellar surface compared to pure MgFeSiO$_4$ grains. For the minimum luminosity phase of this particular model the core-mantle grains become thermally stable at $\sim 2.5\,$R$_*$, $\sim 4.5\,$R$_*$ and $\sim 5.5\,$R$_*$, respectively, if the mantle is 1\%, 5\% or 10\% of the grain radius. The overall temperature structure and, consequently, the radial distances at which dust particles are thermally stable, will vary during the pulsation cycle, and depend on the stellar parameters.
To summarise the results from the second test, it seems that a thin mantle of Fe-bearing silicates, in this case consisting of MgFeSiO$_4$, can be thermally stable quite close to the stellar surface. This thin mantle of MgFeSiO$_4$ corresponds to a small Fe/Mg-ratio but is enough to heat the dust particles and produce silicate features without changing the spectra in the visual and near-IR significantly. For illustration, Fig \ref{f_spec4} shows the ISO spectra of two M-type AGB stars, R Aqr and R Cas, in addition to the original model spectrum and the model spectra with a thin mantle of MgFeSiO$_4$ on top of the Mg$_2$SiO$_4$ grains.
\begin{figure}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{temp.pdf}
\caption{Grain temperature as a function of distance from the star for a model with stellar parameters \mbox{$M=1\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$}, \mbox{$L=5000\,\mathrm{L}_{\odot}$} and \mbox{$T_{*}=2800\,$K} during luminosity minimum. \textit{Top panel:} The original temperature structure of the Mg$_2$SiO$_4$ grains (black) and the temperature structure when setting a minimum temperature of 800\,K (red) and 500\,K (blue). \textit{Lower panels:} The original temperature structure of the Mg$_2$SiO$_4$ grains (black) and the temperature structure of dust particles with a core of Mg$_2$SiO$_4$ and a mantle of MgFeSiO$_4$ when it is thermally stable ($T<1000\,$K), as indicated by the vertical grey line. The green, red and blue lines show the temperature structure for a mantle size that is 1\%, 5\% and 10\% of the grain radius, respectively.}
\label{f_temp}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{spectra5.pdf}
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{spectra4.pdf}
\caption{Spectral energy distributions as a function of wavelength resulting from the dust temperatures indicated in Fig.~\ref{f_temp}. The black curve shows the original spectrum for a dynamical model with pure Mg$_2$SiO$_4$ grains (\mbox{$M=1\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$}, \mbox{$L=5000\,\mathrm{L}_{\odot}$} and \mbox{$T_{*}=2800\,$K}). \textit{Top panel:} The spectra produced when setting a minimum grain temperature of 800\,K (blue) and 500\,K (red) for the pure Mg$_2$SiO$_4$ grains, i.e. using the temperature structure in the top panel of Fig.~\ref{f_temp}. \textit{Bottom panel:} The spectra produced when using a core of Mg$_2$SiO$_4$ and a mantle of MgFeSiO$_4$. The green, red and blue lines show the spectra for a mantle size of 1\%, 5\% and 10\% of the radius, respectively. The corresponding temperature structures are shown in the lower panels of Fig.~\ref{f_temp}}
\label{f_spec}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{forsterite.pdf}
\caption{Spectral energy distribution as a function of wavelength. The red curves shows the observed ISO/SWS spectra of R Aqr and R Cas \citep{kram1,sloan1}. The black solid curve shows the spectra from a dynamical model using pure Mg$_2$SiO$_4$ grains and the grey curves show the spectra when assuming a core of Mg$_2$SiO$_4$ and a mantle of MgFeSiO$_4$ in the a posteriori spectral calculations. The dashed, dot-dashed and dotted lines show the spectra setting the mantle size to 1\%, 5\% and 10\% of the grain radius, respectively.}
\label{f_spec4}
\end{figure}
\section{Grain temperature and the onset of outflow}
\label{s_gtemp}
The grain temperature in our dynamical models is assumed to be determined by radiative equilibrium, but the low absorption cross-section of Mg$_2$SiO$_4$ in the wavelength region where AGB stars emit most of their flux raises the question if this assumption is realistic. \cite{gaug90} have estimated the relative importance of different processes (radiative, collisional, chemical) for changing the internal energy of dust particles consisting of amorphous carbon or astronomical silicates. They found that radiative processes dominate by many orders of magnitude over collisional processes in both cases. However, these materials have high absorption cross-sections in the visual and near-IR wavelength regions, leading to efficient radiative heating. In Appendix \ref{s_radcol} we give estimates for the radiative and collisional heating rates of Mg$_2$SiO$_4$ grains: while radiative heating is much less efficient than for the materials tested by \cite{gaug90}, it still clearly dominates over heating by collisions with the warmer gas.
Under radiative equilibrium conditions, grains of this material tend to cool rapidly in the wind (because of their optical properties, as discussed in Sect.~\ref{s_mir}), with grain temperatures generally a few hundred degrees below the gas temperature. Setting the grain temperature equal to the warmer gas temperature, instead of assuming radiative equilibrium, results in shifting the position of the dust formation zone slightly outwards. This provides us with an opportunity to explore how the radial position of the wind acceleration zone affects dynamic and photometric properties. Fig.~\ref{f_wrad} shows the position of the onset of outflow, averaged over a pulsation cycle, for the two types of models. The red area shows the results from models with a grain temperature determined by radiative equilibrium, indicating a typical distance of the onset of outflows of about $2-3\,R_*$, whereas the blue area shows the results from the models where the grain temperature is set equal to the gas temperature, indicating typical distances of about $3-6\,R_*$ (the purple area shows the overlapping region).
This shift in the radial position of the wind acceleration zone affects the observable properties of the dynamical models. Fig.~\ref{f_dt1} shows the mass-loss rates and wind velocities of the models with a dust temperature based on radiative equilibrium (red squares) and the models where we have assumed that the dust temperature is equal to the gas temperature (blue squares). Both fit observations reasonably well, but the blue models (where the wind acceleration zone is shifted outwards to lower densities) do not reproduce the observations with high values of mass-loss rate and wind velocity, while the stars with low mass loss and slow wind velocities seem to be better reproduced.
In contrast to the dynamical properties, photometry provides strong constraints on the position of the wind acceleration zone. The top panel of Fig.~\ref{f_dt2} shows the average colours $(J-K)$ and $(V-K)$ during a pulsation cycle for the two types of models. The photometry of the models where the grain temperature is set equal to the gas temperature (blue squares) is very similar to the photometry for pulsating models without wind (see Fig.~4 in \cite{bladh13}), whereas the photometry of the models based on radiative equilibrium (red squares) are bluer in $(V-K)$. An in-depth comparison is given in the lower panel of Fig.~\ref{f_dt2}, showing the photometric variations during a pulsation cycle. The red and blue loops are from two dynamical models where the dust temperature is set in different ways but which otherwise have the same model parameters. The black loops show observed photometric variations from a set of very regular mira stars (for a more detailed description of the observational data see \cite{bladh13}). The large variations in $(V-K)$ seen in the observed photometry are not reproduced in the models with a grain temperature set equal to the gas temperature.
\begin{figure}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{bins.pdf}
\caption{Position of the onset of outflow for all models developing a wind, averaged over the pulsation cycle. The red and blue areas represent models where the grain temperature is determined by radiative equilibrium and models where the grain temperature is set equal to the gas temperature, respectively. The purple area is where the two types of models overlap.}
\label{f_wrad}
\end{figure}
It should be mentioned here again that the effects on the photometric colours are not due to dust opacities. Instead the visual and near-IR photometry of the models gives direct diagnostics of the gas, i.e. the structure and dynamics of the atmosphere. As mentioned in Sect.\ref{s_nir}, the large variations observed in $(V-K)$ are a consequence of a change in the abundance of TiO during the pulsation cycle. The position of the onset of outflow affects the overall density and temperature structure of the gas and, consequently, the molecular abundances, by radially expanding the atmosphere outwards. If the wind acceleration zone is shifted to distances where this effect no longer influences the structure of the inner atmosphere, then the resulting photometry will resemble that of a pulsating atmosphere without a stellar wind. It seems that the observed variations in $(V-K)$ do not only reveal that the wind-driving dust species in M-type AGB stars have to be quite transparent in the visual and near-IR, but they also provide an upper limit for the distance of the onset of outflow. We note that this upper limit probably also holds if a different mechanism than radiation pressure on dust accelerates the wind, since the diagnostic presented here is based on gas properties.
\begin{figure}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{dyn_test.pdf}
\caption{Observed mass-loss rates vs. wind velocities of M-type AGB stars \citep[][plus signs]{hans02,gondel03} and the corresponding properties for the dynamical models where the dust temperature is determined by radiative equilibrium (red squares) or set equal to the gas temperature (blue squares). The filled squares mark the dynamical models where a more detailed analysis is conducted.}
\label{f_dt1}
\quad\\
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{grid10.pdf}
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{photomery_example.pdf}
\caption{Observed and synthetic visual and near-IR colours. \textit{Top panel:} Synthetic phase-averaged colours from wind models where the dust temperature is determined by radiative processes (red squares) and the gas temperature (blue squares). \textit{Bottom panel:} Photometric variations derived from sine fits of observed light-curves for a sample set of M-type miras. The synthetic photometric variations for the models marked with filled squares (\mbox{$M=1\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$}, \mbox{$L=5000\,\mathrm{L}_{\odot}$}, \mbox{$T_{*}=2800\,$K}, $u_\mathrm{p}=4$ km/s and $\log n_{\mathrm{gr}}/n_{\mathrm{H}}=-15$) in the top panel are also plotted (solid red and blue loops). The colours are calculated from sine fits of light-curves, same as for the observational data. See \cite{bladh13} for more details concerning the sine-fit of observed light curves. For details on the observational data see Fig.~\ref{f_grid4}.}
\label{f_dt2}
\end{figure}
\section{Summary and conclusions}
\label{s_sum}
In this paper we present the first extensive set of time-dependent models for atmospheres and winds of M-type AGB stars. The stellar winds in these models are driven by photon scattering on Mg$_2$SiO$_4$ dust. Grains of this material can form close enough to the stellar surface, they consist of abundant materials and, if they grow to sizes comparable to the wavelength of the stellar flux maximum, can provide sufficient radiative acceleration to drive outflows.
The current study includes 139 solar-mass models, using three different luminosities ($5000\,$L$_{\odot}$, $7000\,$L$_{\odot}$ and $10000\,$L$_{\odot}$) and effective temperatures ranging from 2600\,K to 3200\,K (see Table~\ref{t_grid}). The input parameters describing stellar pulsations and seed particle abundance are also varied for each combination of stellar parameters, resulting in different atmospheric structures and wind properties. The models produce outflows for a wide range of stellar parameters (see Fig.~\ref{f_ifwind}), as well as mass-loss rates, wind velocities, and visual and near-IR photometry in good agreement with observations (see Fig.~\ref{f_dyn2} and Fig.~\ref{f_grid2}). This demonstrates that winds driven by photon scattering on Mg$_2$SiO$_4$ grains is a viable scenario for the mass loss of M-type AGB stars. However, the current models do not show the characteristic silicate features at \mbox{10 and 18 $\mu$m}. This is not caused by a low abundance of silicate dust in the dynamical models, but rather a too rapidly falling temperature of Mg$_2$SiO$_4$ grains. Adding a thin mantle of MgFeSiO$_4$ to these grains, at distances where such a mantle can be thermally stable, increases the grain temperature and results in spectra with pronounced silicate features.
The visual and near-IR spectra provide constraints on the driving mechanism of the outflows. Stellar winds driven by photon scattering will produce very different spectra than winds driven by true absorption, as there is much less circumstellar reddening by the dust component in the former case. This is confirmed by observed and synthetic colours of M-type AGB stars; the visual and near-IR fluxes are characterised by large variations in $(V-K)$ and small variations in $(J-K)$ during the pulsation cycle (see Fig.~\ref{f_grid4}). The variations in $(V-K)$ are caused by changes in the molecular abundances (mostly TiO) and not by changes in the dust opacities \citep[see Fig.~\ref{f_spectio} and][]{bladh13}. From this we can infer that the envelopes of M-type AGB stars, and, consequently, the dust grains, are quite transparent in the visual and near-IR wavelengths, otherwise the spectral changes would not be dominated by molecular features. The results regarding the mid-IR features mentioned above, however, indicate that the grains have to include a small amount of impurities (dirty silicates). Preliminary tests demonstrate that including a small amount of Fe in magnesium silicate grains is sufficient to solve the problem of grain temperatures and that the visual and near-IR photometry will not be affected significantly. Future models should include a more complete treatment of dust formation.
The models presented in this paper are an important step towards closing a long standing gap in stellar evolution theory. For the first time, it is possible to compute both mass-loss rates and the corresponding spectra from the same time-dependent atmosphere and wind models of M-type AGB stars. This is essential input for models of stellar evolution and population synthesis. However, before the model results can be generally applied in these contexts it is necessary to compute a bigger grid with better coverage of mass, luminosity, effective temperature and other fundamental parameters.
\begin{acknowledgements}
The computations were performed on resources provided by the Swedish National Infrastructure for Computing (SNIC) at UPPMAX. This work has been funded by the Swedish Research Council (\textit{Vetenskapsr\aa det}). The authors also acknowledge the support from the
{\em project STARKEY} funded by the ERC Consolidator Grant, G.A. n.~615604.
\end{acknowledgements}
\bibliographystyle{aa}
\citeindextrue
\section{Introduction}
It is generally assumed that the slow but massive outflows of gas and dust from cool luminous AGB stars are accelerated by radiation pressure on dust grains. The total momentum of the photons emitted by these stars easily matches, or even exceeds, the typical momentum of the stellar winds, and solid particles with the right optical properties can be very efficient in gaining momentum from stellar photons through absorption and scattering processes.
Observationally, grain materials are usually identified through their characteristic lattice modes in the mid-IR, e.g. the well-known silicate features at about 10 and 18$\,\mu$m which are due to stretching and bending modes in the SiO$_4$ tetrahedron. Mid-IR spectra of AGB stars give valuable insights into the complex dust chemistry in the circumstellar envelopes \citep[see e.g.][for an overview]{dor10,agbgrain}. For determining which grains may contribute to wind acceleration, however, important constraints come from the visual and near-infrared wavelength regions which are crucial for the energy and momentum budget of the atmosphere since the radiative flux maximum of the star is at about $1-2\,\mu$m.
This paper is the third in a series dedicated to identifying wind-driving dust species in M-type AGB stars by using a combination of different dynamical models and observational data. In the first paper \citep{bladh12} we focused on dynamical constraints for material properties, using a simple parameterised description of the dust component in frequency-dependent radiation-hydrodynamical models for pulsating atmospheres and winds. Since dust temperatures are strongly affected by the wavelength-dependence of the grain opacities (causing greenhouse or inverse greenhouse effects), we found that many dust species cannot condense sufficiently close to the star to trigger or accelerate a wind. In particular, Fe-bearing silicates suffer from a severe greenhouse effect as a result of the steep slope of the absorption coefficient at near-IR wavelengths, moving their condensation zone much further away from the star than for Fe-free magnesium silicates, which was also demonstrated by \cite{woi06fe}. This effect, by definition, does not appear in wind models with grey radiative transfer, leading to a severe underestimation of the condensation distance for Fe-bearing silicates.
In the second paper \citep{bladh13} we presented synthetic spectra and visual and near-IR photometry resulting from these parameterised models (set P) and from more detailed wind models driven by photon scattering on Mg$_2$SiO$_4$ grains (set D), first presented in \cite{hof08bg}. Comparing the synthetic photometry with observations of M-type AGB stars we found that the latter models (set D) give a good agreement. In particular, they can reproduce large variations of the $(V-K)$ colour during the pulsation cycle due to abundance variations of TiO. This is a strong indication that the circumstellar envelopes of M-type AGB stars, and, consequently, the wind-driving dust grains are rather transparent, excluding true absorption by dust as the main source of momentum.
Results from the parameterised models (set P) support this conclusion, which makes photon scattering on Fe-free silicates a prime candidate for the wind driving mechanism. In order for the grains to be efficient at scattering this scenario requires particles of sizes in the range of $0.1-1\,\mu$m. Recently \cite{norr12} claimed the detection of grains with sizes of $\sim0.3\,\mu$m in the close circumstellar environment of 3 AGB stars, using multi-wavelength aperture-masking polarimetric interferometry.
Given the success in reproducing dynamic and photometric properties for the small sample of wind models driven by photon scattering on Mg$_2$SiO$_4$ grains, we here present the first extensive set of time-dependent wind models for M-type AGB stars based on this mechanism. The aim of this study is to demonstrate that outflows can be produced not only for a few selected cases, but also for models with a wide range of stellar parameters. We also investigate how the observable properties of these models are affected by various parameters, and we compare our results with observations, in particular dynamic properties, visual and near-IR photometry, and mid-IR spectra.
The paper is organised as follows: in Sect.~\ref{s_par} we introduce the basic physical assumptions and input parameters for the dynamical models of M-type AGB stars. In Secs.~\ref{s_dyn}-\ref{s_mir} we evaluate the wind properties, the visual and near-IR photometry and the mid-IR spectra produced by these models and compare with observed values. In Sect.~\ref{s_gtemp} we explore constraints on the position of the wind acceleration zone and in Sect.~\ref{s_sum} we provide a summary of our conclusions.
\section{Modelling method and parameters}
\label{s_par}
The models presented in this paper are similar to model set D in \cite{bladh13}, corresponding to the models first presented in \cite{hof08bg}. We only give a short summary of their main ingredients here. For more detailed information concerning the dynamical models and the \textit{a posteriori} radiative transfer, see previous articles \citep{hof03,hof08bg,bladh12,bladh13} and references therein.
\begin{table*}
\caption{The combinations of input parameters for the models of M-type AGB stars, sorted according to luminosity. The columns list stellar mass $M_\star$, stellar luminosity $L_\star$, effective temperature $T_\star$ of the star, pulsation period $P$, piston velocity amplitude $\Delta u_{\mathrm{p}}$ and the assumed seed particle abundance $n_{\mathrm{gr}}/n_{\mathrm{H}}$. The pulsation period is derived from the period-luminosity relation presented in \cite{fei89}.}
\label{t_grid}
\centering
\begin{tabular}{c c r c c c l}
\hline\hline
Model series & $M_\star$ & $L_\star$ & $T_\star$ & $P(L_\star)$ & $\Delta u_{p}$ & $\log n_{\mathrm{gr}}/n_{\mathrm{H}}$\\
& $[M_{\odot}$] & [$L_{\odot}$] & [K] & [d] & [km/s] & [a, b, c, d]\\
\hline
L50 & 1 & 5000 & 2600--3000 & 310 & 3.0, 4.0 & $-16.0$, $-15.5$, $-15.0$, $-14.5$\\
L70 & 1 & 7000 & 2600--3100& 395 & 3.0, 4.0 & $-16.0$, $-15.5$, $-15.0$, $-14.5$\\
L10 & 1 & 10000 & 2600--3200 & 525 & 2.0, 3.0 & $-16.0$, $-15.5$, $-15.0$, $-14.5$\\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\end{table*}
The variable structures of the atmospheres and winds are produced by simultaneously solving the equations of hydrodynamics, frequency-dependent radiative transfer and time-dependent grain growth, assuming spherical symmetry. The stellar pulsations are simulated by adopting sinusoidal variations of velocity and luminosity at the inner boundary of the atmosphere. When calculating the radiative acceleration of Mg$_2$SiO$_4$ particles, grain-size dependent opacities are used, taking into account both scattering and absorption effects.
Dust formation is considered as a two step process, starting with the rapid formation of tiny seed nuclei with sizes in the nanometre range, followed the much slower growth of the grains through condensation of material from the gas phase, on time scales comparable to atmosphere and wind dynamics. Currently there is no well-established nucleation theory for oxygen-rich atmospheres, describing the formation of the seed particles. Fundamental questions, e.g. their composition (which may differ from the bulk of material building up the grains) are still a matter of debate. Our modelling of dust formation follows \cite{gail99}, assuming that the growth rate of Mg$_2$SiO$_4$ is determined by the addition of SiO molecules to the grain surface, and using a parameter $n_{\mathrm{gr}}/n_{\mathrm{H}}$ that sets the number of seed particles per hydrogen atom\footnote{In contrast, nucleation in carbon-rich stars is often described by classical nucleation theory, assuming that the seed particle and microscopic grains consist of the same material, i.e. amorphous carbon. The values used here for the parameter $n_{\mathrm{gr}}/n_{\mathrm{H}}$ are comparable to values found in carbon star models.}. These seed particles will start to grow when the thermodynamic conditions are favourable. The equation describing the time-dependent growth of Mg$_2$SiO$_4$ grains is discussed in \cite{bladh13}. Since we assume that the formation of seed particles precedes grain growth (i.e. no new seed nuclei are formed) grain size will be uniform in a given mass layer. Because of changing conditions in the atmosphere and wind, however, grain sizes will differ from layer to layer and change with time.
Each dynamic model is represented by a sequence of snapshots of the radial structures, covering typically hundreds of pulsation periods. From this long sequence we select a series of snapshots, equidistant in phase, during three consecutive pulsation periods. For these snapshots we produce spectra and photometry in an \textit{a posteriori} radiative transfer calculation. The synthetic spectra are computed with opacities from the COMA code \citep{ari00} and mean synthetic photometry is calculated by phase-averaging over the pulsation cycle.
The current study includes 139 solar-mass models of M-type AGB stars, with effective temperatures ranging from 2600\, to 3200\,K. Three different luminosities have been used: $5000\,$L$_{\odot}$, $7000\,$L$_{\odot}$ and $10000\,$L$_{\odot}$. These parameters were chosen to represent common M-type AGB stars, according to stellar evolution models. The pulsation period controlling the variations at the inner boundary is derived from the period-luminosity relation presented in \cite{fei89} and the piston velocity amplitude $\Delta u_{\mathrm{p}}$ ranges between 2-4 km/s, depending on luminosity. This results in shock amplitudes of about 15-20 km/s in the inner atmosphere. Table~\ref{t_grid} shows the combination of input parameters of the models, sorted by luminosity. For each fixed luminosity, the effective temperature, piston velocity amplitude and seed particle abundance are varied according to the values listed.
\section{Wind properties}
\label{s_dyn}
\begin{figure}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{plotifwindsb.pdf}
\caption{Dynamic behaviour of the models as a function of input parameters. The red rectangles indicate models with a stellar wind, the blue rectangles indicate models where no wind forms, and the grey rectangles indicate combinations of parameters not tested or where the models fail for numerical reason. For each combination of luminosity and effective temperature the seed particle abundance and piston velocity are varied as indicated by the inset box. See Table~\ref{t_grid} for the different values of seed particle abundance $n_{\mathrm{gr}}/n_{\mathrm{H}}$ (a-d).}
\label{f_ifwind}
\end{figure}
A schematic overview of the dynamical properties of the available models is shown in Fig.\ref{f_ifwind}. The range in effective temperature and luminosity is listed on the x-axis and y-axis, respectively. Each subset consists of twelve boxes and is organised such that the piston velocity is increasing upwards and the seed particle abundance is increasing towards the right. The red boxes represent models that develop a stellar wind, the blue boxes represent models where no wind forms and the grey boxes indicate combinations of parameters not tested or where the models fail for numerical reasons. It is clear from this plot that the dynamical models can produce outflows for a wide range of stellar parameters, although it is generally more difficult to drive winds for high effective temperatures and low luminosities. Judging from these trends, models with lower effective temperature and/or higher luminosity than in this current sample can be expected to produce outflows.\footnote{The current set of models for M-type AGB stars does not lead to any wind models with episodic outflows, whereas such models are found in the grid for C-type AGB stars of \cite{matt10}, as discussed by \cite{erik14}. A possible reason for the different wind behaviour is that dust particles with a large absorption cross-section in the visual and near-IR (e.g. amorphous carbon) cause back-warming effects in the atmosphere. This back-warming can influence the dust formation in the layers below and consequently the dynamics. If the wind-driving dust species is very transparent in the visual and near-IR (e.g. magnesium silicates) and acting predominately through photon scattering, then this feedback through back-warming will not occur.}
While the effects of certain parameters are rather straight-forward ($L_*$, $T_*$), or have been discussed in other papers ($\Delta u_{\mathrm{p}}$), the seed particle abundance needs some further discussion. The range of values for this parameter is limited on both ends since photon scattering as a wind-driving mechanism requires grains in a certain size range \citep[see][for a discussion]{hof08toy}. Fewer seeds make the growth of individual grains more efficient (less competition for material), but may actually lead to a smaller collective opacity if the grains grow beyond the optimal size range. More seeds lead to stronger competition for condensable material, resulting in smaller grains. This effect is demonstrated in Fig.~\ref{f_gsize}, showing the grain radius averaged over pulsation cycle in the outermost layers of the dynamical models that produce a wind, sorted according to seed particle abundance. The degrees of condensed silicon (Si) in the models that produce outflows are shown in Fig.~\ref{f_fc}, with typical values ranging between 10-25\%, corresponding to dust-to-gas mass ratios of about $10^{-3}$. This is in reasonable agreement with recent results by \cite{khou14} for W Hya, who find that about a one third of Si is condensed into grains. According to our models the degree of condensed magnesium will be about twice as much as for Si since Mg$_2$SiO$_4$ has two magnesium atoms per silicon atom and the element abundances of Si and Mg are comparable.
\begin{figure}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{gsize.pdf}
\caption{Grain sizes (averaged over pulsation cycle) at the outer boundary of the models that produce a stellar wind, sorted according to different seed particle abundance $n_{\mathrm{gr}}/n_{\mathrm{H}}$.}
\label{f_gsize}
\qquad\\
\centering
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{fc.pdf}
\caption{The fraction of Si atoms condensed into grains, averaged over pulsation cycle at the outer boundary of the models that produce a stellar wind.}
\label{f_fc}
\end{figure}
A comparison of wind velocities and mass-loss rates of the models with corresponding empirical data for M-type AGB stars, derived from observations of several CO-lines, is shown in Fig.~\ref{f_dyn2}. The agreement with observations is good, not the least considering that this set of models does not correspond to a stellar population, but rather a grid of input parameters where not all combinations of parameters are equally likely. Both high and low mass-loss rates are reproduced, and higher mass-loss rates could probably be reached by increasing the stellar luminosity of the wind models further.
The four panels of Fig.~\ref{f_dyn2} show the same data but the models are colour-coded in different ways to illustrate the effects of different input parameters. The top left panel of Fig. \ref{f_dyn2} shows the dynamical properties of the wind models, colour-coded according to luminosity. The models with different values for the luminosity form bands where higher luminosity correlates with higher mass-loss rates. If we instead plot the dynamical properties colour-coded by seed particle abundance (lower left panel), the models form bands correlating more with wind velocity. In right panels of Fig. \ref{f_dyn2} we also plot the models sorted according to effective temperatures and piston velocities, but we see no distinct trends in wind properties with respect to these parameters.
\begin{figure*}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=9cm]{dyn4.pdf}
\includegraphics[width=9cm]{dyn2.pdf}
\includegraphics[width=9cm]{dyn3.pdf}
\includegraphics[width=9cm]{dyn1.pdf}
\caption{Observed mass-loss rates vs. wind velocities of M-type AGB stars \citep[][plus signs]{hans02,gondel03} and the corresponding properties of all models which develop a wind (indicated in red in Fig.~\ref{f_ifwind}). All panels show the same data but with different colour coding according to stellar luminosity (upper left), effective temperature (upper right), seed particle abundance (lower left) and piston velocity amplitude (lower right). The stellar mass is one solar mass for all models.}
\label{f_dyn2}
\end{figure*}
\section{Visual and near-IR photometry}
\label{s_nir}
Dust-driven winds can be accelerated by both absorption and scattering of stellar photons on dust grains, but scattering is only significant if the grains grow to adequate sizes. If true absorption is the dominant source of the radiative acceleration then significant circumstellar reddening will occur; the dusty envelope will veil the molecular features in the visual wavelength region and emit a significant infrared excess. If scattering is the dominant source of the momentum there will be much less circumstellar reddening; changes in the molecular features during the pulsation cycle will be visible at visual wavelengths and there will not be much infrared excess, even though dust is present. Since the visual and near-IR spectra are strongly sensitive to the wind-driving mechanism, i.e. the optical properties of the wind-driving dust species, we use the colours $(J-K)$ and $(V-K)$ when comparing model results with observational data. The sources of the observational data sets used here are described in detail in \cite{bladh13}.
\begin{table}
\caption{Input parameters for the dynamical models resulting in the photometric variations shown in Fig.~\ref{f_grid4}.}
\label{t_grid2}
\centering
\begin{tabular}{c c c c c}
\hline\hline
$L_\star$ & $T_\star$ & $\Delta u_{p}$ & $\log n_{\mathrm{gr}}/n_{\mathrm{H}}$ & Line\\
$L_{\odot}$ & [K] & [km/s] & & colour \\
\hline
5000 & 2600 & 4.0 & $-15.0$ & red\\
5000 & 2800 & 4.0 & $-15.0$ & red\\\
7000 & 2600 & 3.0 & $-15.0$ & green\\
7000 & 2800 & 3.0 & $-15.0$ & green\\
7000 & 3000 & 3.0 & $-15.0$ & green\\
10000 & 2600 & 2.0 & $-15.0$ & blue\\
10000 & 2800 & 2.0 & $-15.0$ & blue\\
10000 & 3000 & 2.0 & $-15.0$ & blue\\
10000 & 3000 & 3.0 & $-15.5$ & blue\\
10000 & 3200 & 2.0 & $-15.5$ & blue\\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\end{table}
\begin{figure}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{grid11a.pdf}
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{grid11b.pdf}
\caption{Photometric variations during a pulsation cycle in $(J-K)$ vs. $(V-K)$. The black loops show photometric variations derived from sine fits of observed light-curves for a set of M-type miras (R Car, R Hya, R Oct, R Vir, RR Sco, T Col and T Hor) and the coloured loops show synthetic photometric variation from a few selected models (see Table~\ref{t_grid2}). For the observed miras we adopted photometric data in the visual from \citet{Eggen75a} and \citet{men67} and complemented those with the near-IR data published by \citet{WhiMF00}. The synthetic loops are calculated from sine fits of the light-curves in the same way as the observational data. See \cite{bladh13} for more details concerning the sinefit of observed light curves. The bottom panel shows the same data as the top panel, but zoomed in. The observations in grey (plus signs) are presented in Fig.~\ref{f_grid2}.}
\label{f_grid4}
\centering
\quad\\
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{spec13.pdf}
\caption{Spectral energy distribution as a function of wavelength for a model with input parameters \mbox{$M=1\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$}, \mbox{$L=5000\,\mathrm{L}_{\odot}$}, \mbox{$T_{*}=2800\,$K}, \mbox{$u_\mathrm{p}=4\,$km/s}, and \mbox{$\log n_{\mathrm{gr}}/n_{\mathrm{H}}=14.5$}. The original spectrum is shown in black and the coloured curves show spectra calculated without TiO opacities (red) and H$_2$O opacities (blue), indicating which photometric bands will be affected by changes in the corresponding features.}
\label{f_spectio}
\end{figure}
AGB stars are variable stars with photometric properties that change with phase. Realistic dynamical models should be able to reproduce this photometric variation during the pulsation cycle. In Fig.~\ref{f_grid4} we plot the synthetic colour $(J-K)$ vs. $(V-K)$ for a few selected models during a pulsation cycle, together with phase-dependent colours constructed from sine fits of observed light curves \citep[see][for more details]{bladh13}. These photometric variations form loops in the colour-colour diagram, with different positions, shapes and tilts. For M-type AGB stars, both the synthetic and observed colour loops are characterised by large variations in $(V-K)$ and small variations in $(J-K)$, as can be seen in Fig.~\ref{f_grid4}. The colour $(V-K)$ reaches its peak value during luminosity minimum, followed by a trough during luminosity maximum. A closer examination of the synthetic spectra reveals that the large variations in $(V-K)$ during a pulsation cycle are caused by a change in the abundance of molecules (TiO, see Fig.~\ref{f_spectio}), and not by changes in the amount of dust present \citep{bladh13}. This is a strong indication that the wind-driving dust species in M-type AGB stars are quite transparent in the visual and near-IR, otherwise these variations would not be dominated by molecular features.
Looking at Fig.~\ref{f_grid4}, it is clear that phase-averaged colours will be affected by both the position of the loops in the colour-colour diagram and the variations in colour during a pulsation cycle. Fig.~\ref{f_grid2} shows phase-averaged synthetic colours (filled squares), as well as observed colours for both M-type (grey and red plus signs) and C-type AGB stars (green plus signs). The synthetic colours are characterised by blue values in $(J-K)$, especially compared to values of C-type AGB stars, with small differences between the individual dynamical models. There is a strong correlation between the effective temperatures of the models and the values of $(J-K)$, as can be seen in the top right panel of Fig.~\ref{f_grid2}. This is probably because the temperature of the star has a strong impact on the water features \mbox{(see Fig.~\ref{f_spectio})}.
The phase-averaged synthetic $(V-K)$ colours show large differences between individual models. The values of the mean $(V-K)$ colours are mostly determined by the range of variation during the pulsation cycle, i.e. how far the loops extend to the blue side of the diagram. As mentioned above, the variation in visual fluxes is determined by changes in TiO, which in turn reflects changes in temperature during the pulsation cycle. The stronger the temperature variations, the wider the loops, resulting in bluer average $(V-K)$ colours.
The conclusion we can draw from Fig.~\ref{f_grid2} is that the mean synthetic colours reproduce well the observed colours from field M-type AGB stars \citep{men67} and the bulk of the observed values from Bulge miras \citep{gbmiras}, especially the large spread in $(V-K)$. The observed colours from Bulge miras show a much larger spread in $(J-K)$ than the synthetic colours, but this could partly be due to metallicity effects and the fact that we assume solar abundances of C and O in the models. A higher C/O-ratio (closer to 1 than the 0.48 that we assume) should give redder values of $(V-K)$ and $(J-K)$, judging from hydrostatic model atmospheres.
\begin{figure*}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=9cm]{grid1.pdf}
\includegraphics[width=9cm]{grid2.pdf}
\includegraphics[width=9cm]{grid4.pdf}
\includegraphics[width=9cm]{grid3.pdf}
\caption{Observed and mean synthetic colours $(J-K)$ vs. $(V-K)$. The observational data (plus signs) is compiled from different sources: Galactic Bulge miras \citep[grey]{gbmiras}, field M-type LPVs \citep[red]{men67}, and C-rich giants \citep[green]{b01cstars}. The model data (filled squares) is from models which develop a wind, as indicated in red in Fig.~\ref{f_ifwind}. All panels show the same data but with different colour coding according to stellar luminosity (upper left), effective temperature (upper right), seed particle abundance (lower left) and piston velocity (lower right). The stellar mass is one solar mass for all models. Most of the observational data are single epoch measurements, whereas the synthetic colours are means over the pulsation cycle.}
\label{f_grid2}
\end{figure*}
\section{Mid-IR spectra}
\label{s_mir}
An issue with the current wind models is that, although they produce dynamical properties and photometry in the visual and near-IR in agreement with observations (see Secs.~\ref{s_dyn} and \ref{s_nir}), they do not show the prominent silicate features at 10~$\mu$m and 18~$\mu$m that are observed in many oxygen-rich AGB stars. These silicate features have been identified as belonging to magnesium-iron silicates, such as olivine ([Mg,Fe]$_2$SiO$_4$) and pyroxene ([Mg,Fe]SiO$_3$), and are caused by stretching and bending resonances in the SiO$_4$-tetrahedron.
The optical properties of Fe-free silicates offer an explanation as to why the synthetic spectra do not show these prominent features. In the wavelength region where AGB stars emit most of their flux the absorption cross-section of magnesium silicates is very low, in particular compared to the spectral features at 10~$\mu$m and 18~$\mu$m, so the heating of the grains by stellar light is moderately efficient. \mbox{Fig. \ref{f_flux}} shows the absorbed and emitted light for Mg$_2$SiO$_4$ grains (black curves), assuming a geometrically diluted radiative flux from a hydrostatic atmosphere (with stellar parameters typical of an M-type AGB star \mbox{$M=1\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$, $L=5000\,\mathrm{L}_{\odot}$ and $T_{*}=2800\,$K)} and a dust temperature of \mbox{$T_{\mathrm{d}}=1000\,$K}. The energy balance is set mostly in the mid-IR wavelength region and the grains cool efficiently. This is the reason why such grains can form close to the stellar surface, but it also leads to a rapidly falling dust temperature in the wind.
\begin{figure}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{fluxop.pdf}
\caption{Absorbed and emitted flux, $Q_{\mathrm{abs}}(\lambda)F_{\lambda}$ and $Q_{\mathrm{abs}}(\lambda)B_{\lambda}$, for two different grain materials, Mg$_2$SiO$_4$ (black) and MgFeSiO$_4$ (red). The absorbed light is calculated using a geometrically diluted radiation field from a hydrostatic atmosphere (at 2\,R$_*$ for Mg$_2$SiO$_4$ and at 10\,R$_*$ for MgFeSiO$_4$) with stellar parameters typical of an M-type AGB star \mbox{($M=1\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$, $L=5000\,\mathrm{L}_{\odot}$ and $T_{*}=2800\,$K)}. The emitted light is calculated using a Planckian source function at a grain temperature of \mbox{$T_{\mathrm{d}}=1000\,$K}. The optical data for Mg$_2$SiO$_4$ is from \cite{jag03} and the optical data for MgFeSiO$_4$ is from \cite{dor95}. We note that the local radiation field in the wind-acceleration zone will be more pronounced in the mid-IR region than what is shown here because of the addition of the emitted light from the dust component.}
\label{f_flux}
\end{figure}
In order to produce silicate features, the grain temperature needs to fall less rapidly with distance from the star than for pure Mg$_2$SiO$_4$ grains. Fig. \ref{f_flux} indicates that the inclusion of Fe in the silicates will help to achieve this; for MgFeSiO$_4$ grains (red curves) light is mostly absorbed in the near-IR wavelength region and then emitted in mid-IR region. However, because of the increased near-IR absorption Fe-bearing silicates can only become thermally stable further away from the star. Simple estimates and results from dynamical models with frequency-dependent radiative transfer predict that silicates with significant Fe content (e.g. MgFeSiO$_4$) become stable at \mbox{$5-10\,R_*$} \citep{woi06fe,hof08toy,bladh12}. \cite{woi06fe} investigated the growth of inhomogeneous dust grains, composed of a mixture of Mg$_2$SiO$_4$, SiO$_2$, Al$_2$O$_3$, TiO$_2$, and solid Fe in a stellar outflow. He found that once Fe inclusion is possible, it will control the temperature of the inhomogeneous dust grains and act as a thermostat, keeping the grain temperature just below the sublimation limit. The amount of included Fe is thereby adjusted in a self-regulating process.
To test this scenario we use a snapshot of the radial structure from a dynamical model where the wind is driven by photon scattering on Mg$_2$SiO$_4$ grains. In the \textit{a posteriori} radiative transfer calculations we set a lower limit on the grain temperature at 800\,K or 500\,K, as if the grains contained impurities that would keep them warm. The top panel of \mbox{Fig. \ref{f_temp}} shows the original temperature structure for the Mg$_2$SiO$_4$ particles, as well as the cases where a minimum dust temperature of 800\,K and 500\,K is set. The resulting spectra are shown in the top panel of \mbox{Fig. \ref{f_spec}}. It is clear from the prominent silicate features produced in the latter cases that the missing spectral features are not caused by a low abundance of silicate dust in the dynamical models, but rather a too low grain temperature. Keeping the grains warm results in silicate emission features. The warmer the grains are, the more prominent the features.
As mentioned above, a way to increase the grain temperature is to include impurities of Fe in the Mg$_2$SiO$_4$ grains. This can be simulated by considering dust particles with a core of Mg$_2$SiO$_4$ and a thin mantle of MgFeSiO$_4$, as if a small fraction of Fe had condensed onto the surface of pure magnesium silicate grains.\footnote{It is possible to introduce this modification in the \textit{a posteriori} radiative transfer since the inclusion of a small amount of other materials into these particles should not alter the overall structure of the models significantly; transparent materials will not have enough radiative cross-section to alter the energy balance and opaque materials are only thermally stable further out in the wind.} We determine the temperature of these grains through radiative equilibrium, assuming that the addition of a thin mantle MgFeSiO$_4$ will not significantly change the structure of the dynamical model. In the \textit{a posteriori} spectral calculation we replace the temperature structure and the optical properties of the Mg$_2$SiO$_4$ grains with the corresponding properties for the core-mantle grains from the point where they are thermally stable. We assume this to be at the distance from the star where the temperature of the core-mantle grains drops below 1000\,K (approximately the temperature where magnesium-iron silicates will condense). The resulting temperature structure for three different mantle sizes (1\%, 5\% and 10\% of the radius corresponding to 3\%, 15\% and 30\% of the volume) are shown in \mbox{Fig. \ref{f_temp}} and the corresponding spectra are shown in the bottom panel of \mbox{Fig. \ref{f_spec}}. We note that dust particles with a thin mantle of MgFeSiO$_4$ may be thermally stable quite close to the stellar surface compared to pure MgFeSiO$_4$ grains. For the minimum luminosity phase of this particular model the core-mantle grains become thermally stable at $\sim 2.5\,$R$_*$, $\sim 4.5\,$R$_*$ and $\sim 5.5\,$R$_*$, respectively, if the mantle is 1\%, 5\% or 10\% of the grain radius. The overall temperature structure and, consequently, the radial distances at which dust particles are thermally stable, will vary during the pulsation cycle, and depend on the stellar parameters.
To summarise the results from the second test, it seems that a thin mantle of Fe-bearing silicates, in this case consisting of MgFeSiO$_4$, can be thermally stable quite close to the stellar surface. This thin mantle of MgFeSiO$_4$ corresponds to a small Fe/Mg-ratio but is enough to heat the dust particles and produce silicate features without changing the spectra in the visual and near-IR significantly. For illustration, Fig \ref{f_spec4} shows the ISO spectra of two M-type AGB stars, R Aqr and R Cas, in addition to the original model spectrum and the model spectra with a thin mantle of MgFeSiO$_4$ on top of the Mg$_2$SiO$_4$ grains.
\begin{figure}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{temp.pdf}
\caption{Grain temperature as a function of distance from the star for a model with stellar parameters \mbox{$M=1\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$}, \mbox{$L=5000\,\mathrm{L}_{\odot}$} and \mbox{$T_{*}=2800\,$K} during luminosity minimum. \textit{Top panel:} The original temperature structure of the Mg$_2$SiO$_4$ grains (black) and the temperature structure when setting a minimum temperature of 800\,K (red) and 500\,K (blue). \textit{Lower panels:} The original temperature structure of the Mg$_2$SiO$_4$ grains (black) and the temperature structure of dust particles with a core of Mg$_2$SiO$_4$ and a mantle of MgFeSiO$_4$ when it is thermally stable ($T<1000\,$K), as indicated by the vertical grey line. The green, red and blue lines show the temperature structure for a mantle size that is 1\%, 5\% and 10\% of the grain radius, respectively.}
\label{f_temp}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{spectra5.pdf}
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{spectra4.pdf}
\caption{Spectral energy distributions as a function of wavelength resulting from the dust temperatures indicated in Fig.~\ref{f_temp}. The black curve shows the original spectrum for a dynamical model with pure Mg$_2$SiO$_4$ grains (\mbox{$M=1\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$}, \mbox{$L=5000\,\mathrm{L}_{\odot}$} and \mbox{$T_{*}=2800\,$K}). \textit{Top panel:} The spectra produced when setting a minimum grain temperature of 800\,K (blue) and 500\,K (red) for the pure Mg$_2$SiO$_4$ grains, i.e. using the temperature structure in the top panel of Fig.~\ref{f_temp}. \textit{Bottom panel:} The spectra produced when using a core of Mg$_2$SiO$_4$ and a mantle of MgFeSiO$_4$. The green, red and blue lines show the spectra for a mantle size of 1\%, 5\% and 10\% of the radius, respectively. The corresponding temperature structures are shown in the lower panels of Fig.~\ref{f_temp}}
\label{f_spec}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{forsterite.pdf}
\caption{Spectral energy distribution as a function of wavelength. The red curves shows the observed ISO/SWS spectra of R Aqr and R Cas \citep{kram1,sloan1}. The black solid curve shows the spectra from a dynamical model using pure Mg$_2$SiO$_4$ grains and the grey curves show the spectra when assuming a core of Mg$_2$SiO$_4$ and a mantle of MgFeSiO$_4$ in the a posteriori spectral calculations. The dashed, dot-dashed and dotted lines show the spectra setting the mantle size to 1\%, 5\% and 10\% of the grain radius, respectively.}
\label{f_spec4}
\end{figure}
\section{Grain temperature and the onset of outflow}
\label{s_gtemp}
The grain temperature in our dynamical models is assumed to be determined by radiative equilibrium, but the low absorption cross-section of Mg$_2$SiO$_4$ in the wavelength region where AGB stars emit most of their flux raises the question if this assumption is realistic. \cite{gaug90} have estimated the relative importance of different processes (radiative, collisional, chemical) for changing the internal energy of dust particles consisting of amorphous carbon or astronomical silicates. They found that radiative processes dominate by many orders of magnitude over collisional processes in both cases. However, these materials have high absorption cross-sections in the visual and near-IR wavelength regions, leading to efficient radiative heating. In Appendix \ref{s_radcol} we give estimates for the radiative and collisional heating rates of Mg$_2$SiO$_4$ grains: while radiative heating is much less efficient than for the materials tested by \cite{gaug90}, it still clearly dominates over heating by collisions with the warmer gas.
Under radiative equilibrium conditions, grains of this material tend to cool rapidly in the wind (because of their optical properties, as discussed in Sect.~\ref{s_mir}), with grain temperatures generally a few hundred degrees below the gas temperature. Setting the grain temperature equal to the warmer gas temperature, instead of assuming radiative equilibrium, results in shifting the position of the dust formation zone slightly outwards. This provides us with an opportunity to explore how the radial position of the wind acceleration zone affects dynamic and photometric properties. Fig.~\ref{f_wrad} shows the position of the onset of outflow, averaged over a pulsation cycle, for the two types of models. The red area shows the results from models with a grain temperature determined by radiative equilibrium, indicating a typical distance of the onset of outflows of about $2-3\,R_*$, whereas the blue area shows the results from the models where the grain temperature is set equal to the gas temperature, indicating typical distances of about $3-6\,R_*$ (the purple area shows the overlapping region).
This shift in the radial position of the wind acceleration zone affects the observable properties of the dynamical models. Fig.~\ref{f_dt1} shows the mass-loss rates and wind velocities of the models with a dust temperature based on radiative equilibrium (red squares) and the models where we have assumed that the dust temperature is equal to the gas temperature (blue squares). Both fit observations reasonably well, but the blue models (where the wind acceleration zone is shifted outwards to lower densities) do not reproduce the observations with high values of mass-loss rate and wind velocity, while the stars with low mass loss and slow wind velocities seem to be better reproduced.
In contrast to the dynamical properties, photometry provides strong constraints on the position of the wind acceleration zone. The top panel of Fig.~\ref{f_dt2} shows the average colours $(J-K)$ and $(V-K)$ during a pulsation cycle for the two types of models. The photometry of the models where the grain temperature is set equal to the gas temperature (blue squares) is very similar to the photometry for pulsating models without wind (see Fig.~4 in \cite{bladh13}), whereas the photometry of the models based on radiative equilibrium (red squares) are bluer in $(V-K)$. An in-depth comparison is given in the lower panel of Fig.~\ref{f_dt2}, showing the photometric variations during a pulsation cycle. The red and blue loops are from two dynamical models where the dust temperature is set in different ways but which otherwise have the same model parameters. The black loops show observed photometric variations from a set of very regular mira stars (for a more detailed description of the observational data see \cite{bladh13}). The large variations in $(V-K)$ seen in the observed photometry are not reproduced in the models with a grain temperature set equal to the gas temperature.
\begin{figure}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{bins.pdf}
\caption{Position of the onset of outflow for all models developing a wind, averaged over the pulsation cycle. The red and blue areas represent models where the grain temperature is determined by radiative equilibrium and models where the grain temperature is set equal to the gas temperature, respectively. The purple area is where the two types of models overlap.}
\label{f_wrad}
\end{figure}
It should be mentioned here again that the effects on the photometric colours are not due to dust opacities. Instead the visual and near-IR photometry of the models gives direct diagnostics of the gas, i.e. the structure and dynamics of the atmosphere. As mentioned in Sect.\ref{s_nir}, the large variations observed in $(V-K)$ are a consequence of a change in the abundance of TiO during the pulsation cycle. The position of the onset of outflow affects the overall density and temperature structure of the gas and, consequently, the molecular abundances, by radially expanding the atmosphere outwards. If the wind acceleration zone is shifted to distances where this effect no longer influences the structure of the inner atmosphere, then the resulting photometry will resemble that of a pulsating atmosphere without a stellar wind. It seems that the observed variations in $(V-K)$ do not only reveal that the wind-driving dust species in M-type AGB stars have to be quite transparent in the visual and near-IR, but they also provide an upper limit for the distance of the onset of outflow. We note that this upper limit probably also holds if a different mechanism than radiation pressure on dust accelerates the wind, since the diagnostic presented here is based on gas properties.
\begin{figure}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{dyn_test.pdf}
\caption{Observed mass-loss rates vs. wind velocities of M-type AGB stars \citep[][plus signs]{hans02,gondel03} and the corresponding properties for the dynamical models where the dust temperature is determined by radiative equilibrium (red squares) or set equal to the gas temperature (blue squares). The filled squares mark the dynamical models where a more detailed analysis is conducted.}
\label{f_dt1}
\quad\\
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{grid10.pdf}
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{photomery_example.pdf}
\caption{Observed and synthetic visual and near-IR colours. \textit{Top panel:} Synthetic phase-averaged colours from wind models where the dust temperature is determined by radiative processes (red squares) and the gas temperature (blue squares). \textit{Bottom panel:} Photometric variations derived from sine fits of observed light-curves for a sample set of M-type miras. The synthetic photometric variations for the models marked with filled squares (\mbox{$M=1\,\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$}, \mbox{$L=5000\,\mathrm{L}_{\odot}$}, \mbox{$T_{*}=2800\,$K}, $u_\mathrm{p}=4$ km/s and $\log n_{\mathrm{gr}}/n_{\mathrm{H}}=-15$) in the top panel are also plotted (solid red and blue loops). The colours are calculated from sine fits of light-curves, same as for the observational data. See \cite{bladh13} for more details concerning the sine-fit of observed light curves. For details on the observational data see Fig.~\ref{f_grid4}.}
\label{f_dt2}
\end{figure}
\section{Summary and conclusions}
\label{s_sum}
In this paper we present the first extensive set of time-dependent models for atmospheres and winds of M-type AGB stars. The stellar winds in these models are driven by photon scattering on Mg$_2$SiO$_4$ dust. Grains of this material can form close enough to the stellar surface, they consist of abundant materials and, if they grow to sizes comparable to the wavelength of the stellar flux maximum, can provide sufficient radiative acceleration to drive outflows.
The current study includes 139 solar-mass models, using three different luminosities ($5000\,$L$_{\odot}$, $7000\,$L$_{\odot}$ and $10000\,$L$_{\odot}$) and effective temperatures ranging from 2600\,K to 3200\,K (see Table~\ref{t_grid}). The input parameters describing stellar pulsations and seed particle abundance are also varied for each combination of stellar parameters, resulting in different atmospheric structures and wind properties. The models produce outflows for a wide range of stellar parameters (see Fig.~\ref{f_ifwind}), as well as mass-loss rates, wind velocities, and visual and near-IR photometry in good agreement with observations (see Fig.~\ref{f_dyn2} and Fig.~\ref{f_grid2}). This demonstrates that winds driven by photon scattering on Mg$_2$SiO$_4$ grains is a viable scenario for the mass loss of M-type AGB stars. However, the current models do not show the characteristic silicate features at \mbox{10 and 18 $\mu$m}. This is not caused by a low abundance of silicate dust in the dynamical models, but rather a too rapidly falling temperature of Mg$_2$SiO$_4$ grains. Adding a thin mantle of MgFeSiO$_4$ to these grains, at distances where such a mantle can be thermally stable, increases the grain temperature and results in spectra with pronounced silicate features.
The visual and near-IR spectra provide constraints on the driving mechanism of the outflows. Stellar winds driven by photon scattering will produce very different spectra than winds driven by true absorption, as there is much less circumstellar reddening by the dust component in the former case. This is confirmed by observed and synthetic colours of M-type AGB stars; the visual and near-IR fluxes are characterised by large variations in $(V-K)$ and small variations in $(J-K)$ during the pulsation cycle (see Fig.~\ref{f_grid4}). The variations in $(V-K)$ are caused by changes in the molecular abundances (mostly TiO) and not by changes in the dust opacities \citep[see Fig.~\ref{f_spectio} and][]{bladh13}. From this we can infer that the envelopes of M-type AGB stars, and, consequently, the dust grains, are quite transparent in the visual and near-IR wavelengths, otherwise the spectral changes would not be dominated by molecular features. The results regarding the mid-IR features mentioned above, however, indicate that the grains have to include a small amount of impurities (dirty silicates). Preliminary tests demonstrate that including a small amount of Fe in magnesium silicate grains is sufficient to solve the problem of grain temperatures and that the visual and near-IR photometry will not be affected significantly. Future models should include a more complete treatment of dust formation.
The models presented in this paper are an important step towards closing a long standing gap in stellar evolution theory. For the first time, it is possible to compute both mass-loss rates and the corresponding spectra from the same time-dependent atmosphere and wind models of M-type AGB stars. This is essential input for models of stellar evolution and population synthesis. However, before the model results can be generally applied in these contexts it is necessary to compute a bigger grid with better coverage of mass, luminosity, effective temperature and other fundamental parameters.
\begin{acknowledgements}
The computations were performed on resources provided by the Swedish National Infrastructure for Computing (SNIC) at UPPMAX. This work has been funded by the Swedish Research Council (\textit{Vetenskapsr\aa det}). The authors also acknowledge the support from the
{\em project STARKEY} funded by the ERC Consolidator Grant, G.A. n.~615604.
\end{acknowledgements}
\bibliographystyle{aa}
\citeindextrue
|
\section{Introduction}
By the renormalization group (RG) flow we have a tool to describe a QFT-model
at different scales. In this description, the basic fields, the gauge-fixing parameter,
the masses and the prefactors of the various interaction terms are scale-dependent
quantities.
On the other hand the derivation of the Lagrangian of a
model for massive vector bosons by the Higgs mechanism, i.e.~by spontaneous
symmetry breaking of a gauge theory, implies that the prefactors
of the various interaction terms are uniquely determined functions of the coupling
constant(s) and masses.
Do these functions remain unchanged under the RG-flow, i.e.~under an arbitrary change of
scale? This question is a reformulation of the title of this paper. Since the
non-trivial contributions to the RG-flow come from loop diagrams and
different interaction terms get different
loop-corrections, it is uncertain, whether the answer is 'yes'.
Or - one can come to the same conclusion by considering the underlying frameworks:
the Higgs mechanism is formulated in classical field theory and, to the best of our
knowledge, it is not understood in a pure QFT framework; on the other hand,
the RG-flow is a pure quantum effect.
Some readers may wonder, whether the Lagrangian of the scaled model describes still
a consistent QFT-model, if it is not derivable by the Higgs mechanism? The
answer is 'yes', for the following reasons: since Poincar{\'e} invariance,
relevant discrete symmetries and renormalizability are maintained under the RG-flow,
the crucial requirement for consistency of a quantum gauge model is physical consistency (PC)
\cite{Kugo-Ojima,DS2000}. This is the condition that the free BRST-charge%
\footnote{That is the charge implementing the BRST-transformation of the asymptotic free fields.}
commutes with the ``$S$-matrix'' in the adiabatic limit, in order that the latter induces a
well-defined operator on the physical subspace. We give a model-independent proof that PC
is maintained under the RG-flow (Theorem \ref{thm:PC}).
In the literature we could not find an explicit 'yes' or 'no' to the question
in the title. However,
some papers silently assume that the answer is 'yes' -- see the few examples mentioned in
\cite[Introduction]{Duetsch15}. The answer certainly depends on the renormalization scheme.
We work with the definition of the RG-flow given in framework
Epstein-Glaser renormalization \cite{EG73}: since a scaling transformation
amounts to a change of the renormalization prescription, it can equivalently be expressed
by a renormalization of the interaction -- this is an application of the
Main Theorem, see \cite{PS82,HW03,DF04,BDF09}. The so defined RG-flow depends on the
renormalization scheme via the two possibilities that the scaling transformation may act
on the renormalization mass scale(s) or it may not; and this may be different for
different Feynman diagrams.
We investigate the question in the title by explicit 1-loop calculations -- the technical
details are omitted in this paper, they are given in \cite{Duetsch15}. To minimise the
computations, we study the model of one massive vector field, that is, we start the RG-flow
with the $U(1)$-Higgs model.
\section{Precise formulation of the question}
\paragraph{Lagrangian of the initial model}
The just mentioned model has one massive vector field $A^\mu$, the
corresponding St\"uckelberg field $B$, a further real scalar field $\varphi$
(``Higgs field'') and the Fadeev-Popov ghost fields $(u\,,\,\tilde u)$.
The Lagrangian reads
\begin{equation}\label{eq:L-total}
L_\mathrm{total}\simeq
-\frac{1}4\,F^2+\frac{1}2\,(D^\mu\Phi)^*D_\mu\Phi-V(\Phi)+L_\mathrm{gf}+L_\mathrm{ghost}\ ,
\end{equation}
where $\simeq$ means equal up to the addition of terms of type $\d^a A$, where
$|a|\geq 1$ and $A$ is a local field polynomial. In addition
we use the notations
$F^2:=(\d^\mu A^\nu-\d^\nu A^\mu)(\d_\mu A_\nu-\d_\nu A_\mu)$,
\begin{equation}\label{geom1}
\Phi:=iB+\frac{m}{\kappa}+\varphi\ ,\quad D^\mu:=\d^\mu-i\kappa\,A^\mu
\end{equation}
and
\begin{equation}\label{geom2}
V(\Phi):=\frac{\kappa^2m_H^2}{8m^2}\,(\Phi^*\Phi)^2-\frac{m_H^2}{4}\,(\Phi^*\Phi)+\frac{m_H^2 m^2}{8\kappa^2}\ ,
\end{equation}
where $\kappa$ is the coupling constant and $m$ and $m_H$ are the masses of the $A$- and $\varphi$-field,
respectively, as it turns out below in \eqref{L-free}.
The gauge-fixing and ghost Lagrangian are given by
\begin{equation}\label{L-gf}
L_\mathrm{gf}:=-\frac{\Lambda}{2} \biggl( \d A + \frac{m}{\Lambda} B \biggr)^2
\end{equation}
and
\begin{equation}\label{L-ghost}
L_{\mathrm{ghost}}:= \d\tilde u\d u - \frac{m^2}{\Lambda}\, \tilde u u
- \frac{\kappa\,m}{\Lambda}\,\tilde u u\varphi\ ,
\end{equation}
respectively, where $\Lambda$ is the gauge-fixing parameter.
The masses of the $A$- and $\varphi$-field are generated by the Higgs mechanism.
In view of perturbation theory we
split $L_\mathrm{total}$ into a free part $L_0$ (all bilinear terms)
and an interacting part $L$ (all tri- and quadrilinear terms):
\begin{align}
L_0 &= -\frac{1}4\,F^2 + \frac{m^2}{2} A^2
+ \frac{1}{2} (\d B)^2 -\frac{m^2}{2\Lambda}\, B^2
- \frac{\Lambda}{2} (\d A)^2 \nonumber\\
&+ \frac{1}{2} (\d\varphi)^2 - \frac{m_H^2}{2}\, \varphi^2
+ \d\tilde u\d u - \frac{m^2}{\Lambda}\, \tilde u u \ , \label{L-free}\\
L&= \kappa\Bigl( m\, A^2\varphi - \frac{m^2}{\Lambda}\tilde u u\varphi +
B(A\d\varphi) - \varphi(A\d B) - \frac{m_H^2}{2m} \varphi^3
- \frac{m_H^2}{2m} B^2\varphi\Bigr)\nonumber \\
&+ \kappa^2\Bigl(\frac{1}{2} A^2 (\varphi^2 + B^2)
- \frac{m_H^2}{8m^2} \varphi^4 - \frac{m_H^2}{4m^2} \varphi^2 B^2
- \frac{m_H^2}{8m^2} B^4\Bigr)\ , \label{L-int}
\end{align}
where $V^2:=V^\mu V_\mu$, $VW:=V^\mu W_\mu$ for Lorentz vectors $V,W\in\CC ^4$.
\begin{rem}
The BRST-transformation is a graded derivation which commutes with partial derivatives and
is given on the basic fields by
\begin{align}\label{BRS-trafo}
s\,A^\mu=\d^\mu u\ ,& \quad s\,B=mu+\kappa\,u\varphi\ ,\quad s\,\varphi=-\kappa\,Bu\ ,\nonumber\\
s\,u=0\ ,& \quad s\,\tilde u=-\Lambda\,(\d A+\frac{m}{\Lambda}\,B)\ .
\end{align}
By $s_0:=s\vert_{\kappa =0}$ we denote its version
for the free theory. We point out that $L$ and $L_0$ are
invariant w.r.t.~the pertinent BRST-transformation:
\begin{equation}
sL\simeq 0\ ,\quad\quad s_0L_0\simeq 0\ ,
\end{equation}
where $\simeq$ has the same meaning as above.
\end{rem}
\paragraph{Definition of the RG-flow}
In view of Epstein-Glaser renormalization \cite{EG73} we write
\begin{equation}\label{L1+L2}
L=\kappa\,L_1+\kappa^2\,L_2
\end{equation}
and introduce an adiabatic switching of
the coupling constant by a test function $g\in\mathcal{D}(\RR ^4)$:
\begin{equation}\label{L(g)}
L(g)\equiv L^{\mathbf{m}}(g):=\int dx\,\Bigl(\kappa\,g(x)\,L_1(x)+
\bigl(\kappa\,g(x)\bigr)^2\,L_2(x)\Bigr)\ .
\end{equation}
For later purpose we have introduced the upper index $\mathbf{m}:=(m,m_H)$.
In the Epstein-Glaser framework the RG-flow is defined
by a scaling transformation $\sigma_\rho$ \cite{HW03,DF04,BDF09}:
\begin{equation}\label{scaltrafo}
\sigma_\rho^{-1}(\phi(x))=\rho\,\phi(\rho x)\ ,\quad \phi=A^\mu,B,\varphi,u,\tilde u\ ,\quad\rho > 0\ ,
\end{equation}
and a simultaneous scaling of the masses
$\mathbf{m}\mapsto\rho^{-1}\mathbf{m}=(\rho^{-1} m,\rho^{-1} m_H)$;
see \cite{DF04} for the precise definition of $\sigma_\rho$.
Under this transformation the classical action is invariant
(up to a scaling of the switching function $g$).
In QFT scaling invariance is in general broken in the process of renormalization. To explain this,
we introduce the generating functional $S(iL(g))$ of the
time-ordered products of $L(g)$, i.e.
\begin{equation}\label{T-product}
T_n(L(g)^{\otimes n})=\frac{d^n}{i^n\,d\eta^n}\vert_{\eta =0}\,S(i\eta \,L(g))
\quad\text{or generally}\quad T_n=S^{(n)}(0)\ ,
\end{equation}
which we construct inductively by Epstein-Glaser renormalization \cite{EG73}.
To define the RG-flow, we need to perform the adiabatic limit
\begin{equation}\label{adlim}
\mathbf{S}[L]:=\lim_{\varepsilon\downarrow 0}S(iL(g_\varepsilon))\ ,
\quad g_\varepsilon(x):=g(\varepsilon x)\ ,
\end{equation}
where $g(0)=1$ is assumed.
For a purely massive model and with a suitable (re)normalization of $S(iL(g))$,
this limit exists in the strong operator sense. For a rigorous proof of this statement we refer
to \cite{EG73,EG76}; in this paper we treat the adiabatic limit on a heuristic level.
The Main Theorem of perturbative renormalization \cite{PS82,DF04,HW03}
implies that a scaling transformation of $\mathbf{S}[L]$, i.e.
$$
\mathbf{S}_{\mathbf{m}}[L^{\mathbf{m}}]\mapsto
\sigma_\rho(\mathbf{S}_{\rho^{-1}\mathbf{m}}[\sigma_\rho^{-1}(L^{\mathbf{m}})])\ ,
$$
can equivalently be expressed by a renormalization of the interaction $L^{\mathbf{m}}
\mapsto z_\rho(L^{\mathbf{m}})$ (``running interaction''), explicitly
\begin{equation}\label{main-theorem-adlim}
\sigma_\rho(\mathbf{S}_{\rho^{-1}\mathbf{m}}[\sigma_\rho^{-1}(L^{\mathbf{m}})])=
\mathbf{S}_{\mathbf{m}}[ z_\rho(L^{\mathbf{m}})]\ ,
\end{equation}
where the lower index $\mathbf{m}$ of $\mathbf{S}_{\mathbf{m}}$ denotes the masses of the Feynman propagators.
This is explained in detail in Sect.~\ref{sec:stab-PC}.
\paragraph{The form of the running interaction}
Using general properties of the running interaction (derived in \cite{DF04}),
we know that each term appearing in $z_\rho(L)$ is Lorentz invariant, has ghost number $=0$ and
has mass dimension $\leq 4$. In addition, using that $L$ \eqref{L-int}
is even under the field parity transformation
\begin{equation}\label{fieldparity}
(A,B,\varphi,u,\tilde u)\mapsto (-A,-B,\varphi,u,\tilde u)\ ,
\end{equation}
one easily derives that also $z_\rho(L)$ is even under this transformation.
One can also show that only one term containing the Fadeev-Popov ghosts can appear in
$(z_\rho(L)-L)$, namely a term $\sim\tilde u u$. Moreover,
with a slight restriction on the (re)normalization of $S(iL(g))$, one can exclude
$1$-leg terms from $z_\rho(L)$ \cite{Duetsch15}.
Using these facts, we conclude that the running interaction has the form
\begin{align}\label{z(L)}
z_\rho(L) \simeq &\hbar^{-1}\Bigl[ k_\rho
-\frac{1}4 a_{0\rho}\,F^2 + \frac{m^2}{2}a_{1\rho} A^2 - \frac{a_{2\rho}}{2} (\d A)^2
+ \frac{1}{2} b_{0\rho} (\d B)^2 - \frac{m^2}{2\,\Lambda}\, b_{1\rho}\, B^2\nonumber\\
&+ \frac{1}{2} c_{0\rho}\,(\d\varphi)^2 - \frac{m_H^2}{2}c_{1\rho}\, \varphi^2
-\frac{m^2}{\Lambda} \,c_{2\rho}\, \tilde u u+b_{2\rho}\,m\,(A\d B)\nonumber\\
&+\kappa\Bigl((1+ l_{0\rho})\,m\, A^2\varphi -\frac{m}{\Lambda}\,\tilde u u\varphi +(1+ l_{1\rho})\, B(A\d\varphi)\nonumber\\
& - (1+ l_{2\rho})\, \varphi(A\d B) - \frac{(1+ l_{3\rho}) m_H^2}{2m}\, \varphi^3
- \frac{(1+l_{4\rho}) m_H^2}{2m}\, B^2\varphi\Bigr)\nonumber \\
&+\kappa^2\Bigl( \frac{(1+ l_{5\rho})}{2} A^2\, \varphi^2 + \frac{(1+ l_{6\rho})}{2} A^2\, B^2
- \frac{(1+ l_{7\rho})m_H^2}{8m^2}\, \varphi^4 \nonumber\\
&- \frac{(1+ l_{8\rho})m_H^2}{4m^2}\, \varphi^2 B^2
- \frac{(1+ l_{9\rho})m_H^2}{8m^2}\, B^4 +l_{11\rho}\,(A^2)^2\Bigr)\Bigr]\ ,
\end{align}
where $\simeq$ has the same meaning as in \eqref{eq:L-total} and
$k_\rho\in\hbar\,\CC[[\hbar]]$ is a constant field (it is the contribution of the
vacuum diagrams), which may be neglected.
The dimensionless, $\rho$-dependent coefficients
$k_\rho,\,a_{j\rho},\,b_{j\rho},\,c_{j\rho}$ and $l_{j\rho}$
will collectively be denoted by $e_\rho$. In principle these coefficients are computable --
at least to lowest orders; however, at the present stage they are
unknown. As shown in \cite{Duetsch15}, the $e_\rho$'s are formal power series in $\kappa^2\hbar$ with
vanishing term of zeroth order,
\begin{equation}\label{powerseries}
e_\rho=\sum_{n=1}^\infty e_\rho^{(n)}\,(\kappa^2\hbar)^n\ ,\quad e=k,a_j,\,b_j,\,c_j,\,l_j\ .
\end{equation}
Due to $z_{\rho=1}(L)=L/\hbar$, all
functions $\rho\mapsto e_\rho$ have the initial value $0$ at $\rho=1$.
\paragraph{Renormalization of the wave functions, masses, gauge-fixing parameter and coupling parameters}
Except for the $A\d B$- and $A^4$-term, all field monomials appearing in $z_\rho(L)$ are already present in
$L_0+L$. Therefore, introducing new fields, which are of the form
\begin{equation}\label{new-fields}
\phi_\rho(x)=f_\phi(\rho)\,\phi(x)\ ,\quad \phi=A,\,B,\,\varphi,
\end{equation}
where $f_\phi:\,(0,\infty)\to\CC$ is a $\phi$-dependent function,
and introducing a running gauge-fixing parameter $\Lambda_\rho$,
running masses $\mathbf{m}_\rho\equiv (m_\rho,\,m_{B\rho},\,m_{u\rho},\,m_{H\rho})$ and
running coupling constants $\kappa_\rho\lambda_{j\rho}$, we can
achieve that $L_0+z_\rho(L)-k_\rho$ has roughly the same form as $L_0+L$:
\begin{equation}\label{parameter-ren}
L_0+z_\rho(L)-k_\rho=L_0^\rho+L^\rho\ ,
\end{equation}
where
\begin{align}
L^\rho_0 &= -\frac{1}4\,F_\rho^2 + \frac{m_\rho^2}{2} A_\rho^2
+ \frac{1}{2} (\d B_\rho)^2 -\frac{m_{B\rho}^2}{2}\, B_\rho^2
- \frac{\Lambda_\rho}{2} (\d A_\rho)^2 \nonumber\\
&+ \frac{1}{2} (\d\varphi_\rho)^2 - \frac{m_{H\rho}^2}{2}\, \varphi_\rho^2
+ \d\tilde u\d u - m_{u\rho}^2\, \tilde u u \ ,
\end{align}
(with $F_\rho^{\mu\nu}:=\d^\mu A_\rho^\nu-\d^\nu A_\rho^\mu$) and
\begin{align}
L^\rho &=\kappa_\rho\Bigl( m_\rho A_\rho^2\varphi_\rho - \frac{\lambda_{10\rho}\,m_{u\rho}^2}{m_\rho}\tilde u u\varphi +
\lambda_{1\rho} B_\rho(A_\rho\d\varphi_\rho)\nonumber\\
&- \lambda_{2\rho} \varphi_\rho(A_\rho\d B_\rho) - \frac{\lambda_{3\rho} m_{H\rho}^2}{2m_\rho} \varphi_\rho^3
- \frac{\lambda_{4\rho} m_{H\rho}^2}{2m_\rho} B_\rho^2\varphi_\rho\Bigr)\nonumber \\
&+ \kappa^2\Bigl(\frac{\lambda_{5\rho}}{2} A_\rho^2 \varphi_\rho^2 + \frac{\lambda_{6\rho}}{2} A_\rho^2 B_\rho^2
- \frac{\lambda_{7\rho}m_{H\rho}^2}{8m_\rho^2} \varphi_\rho^4 \nonumber\\
&- \frac{\lambda_{8\rho}m_{H\rho}^2}{4m_\rho^2} \varphi_\rho^2 B_\rho^2
- \frac{\lambda_{9\rho}m_{H\rho}^2}{8m_\rho^2} B_\rho^4+\lambda_{11\rho}\,A_\rho^2\Bigr)\nonumber\\
&+\bigl((\lambda_{12\rho}-1)m_\rho+\sqrt{\Lambda_\rho}\,m_{B\rho}\bigr)\,A_\rho\d B_\rho\ .
\end{align}
In view of the Higgs mechanism for $L+z_\rho(L)$ \eqref{L-new}, the definition of $\lambda_{12\rho}$ is
rather complicated. Apart from the $A\d B$-term, we have absorbed the novel
bilinear interaction terms in the free Lagrangian.
Since every new field is of the form \eqref{new-fields},
the condition \eqref{parameter-ren} is an equation for polynomials in the old fields;
equating the coefficients we obtain the following explicit formulas for the running quantities:\\
- for the wave functions
\begin{equation}\label{wf-ren}
A^\mu_\rho=\sqrt{1+a_{0\rho}}\,A^\mu\ ,\quad
B_\rho=\sqrt{1+b_{0\rho}}\,B\ ,\quad
\varphi_\rho=\sqrt{1+c_{0\rho}}\,\varphi\ ;
\end{equation}
- for the gauge-fixing parameter
\begin{equation}\label{gauge-ren}
\Lambda_\rho=\frac{\Lambda+a_{2\rho}}{1+a_{0\rho}}\ ;
\end{equation}
- for the masses
\begin{align}\label{mass-ren}
m_\rho=\sqrt{\frac{1+a_{1\rho}}{1+a_{0\rho}}}\,m\ ,&\qquad
m_{H\rho}=\sqrt{\frac{1+c_{1\rho}}{{1+c_{0\rho}}}}\,m_H\ ,\nonumber\\
m_{B\rho}=\sqrt{\frac{1+b_{1\rho}}{{1+b_{0\rho}}}}\,\frac{m}{\sqrt{\Lambda}}\ ,&\qquad
m_{u\rho}=\sqrt{1+c_{2\rho}}\,\frac{m}{\sqrt{\Lambda}}\ ;
\end{align}
- for the coupling constant
\begin{equation}\label{cc-ren}
\kappa_\rho=\frac{1+l_{0\rho}}{\sqrt{(1+a_{0\rho})(1+a_{1\rho})(1+c_{0\rho})}}\,\kappa\ ;
\end{equation}
and the running coupling parameters $\lambda_{j\rho}$ are determined analogously.
By the renormalization of the wave functions, masses and gauge
fixing-parameter, we change the splitting of the total Lagrangian $L_0+z_\rho(L)$ into a free and
interacting part, i.e.~we change the starting point for the perturbative expansion. To justify this,
one has to show that the two pertubative QFTs given by the splittings $L_0+z_\rho(L)$ and
$L_0^\rho+L^\rho$, respectively, have the same physical content.\footnote{This statement can be viewed as an
application of the ``Principle of Perturbative Agreement'' of Hollands and Wald \cite{HW05}.}
Using the framework of algebraic QFT, one has to show the following: given a renormalization
prescription for $L_0+z_\rho(L)$, there exists a renormalization prescription for $L_0^\rho+L^\rho$,
such that, in the
algebraic adiabatic limit, the pertinent nets of local observables (see \cite{BF00} or \cite{DF04,BDF09})
are equivalent. This task is beyond the scope of this paper.
\paragraph{Higgs mechanism at an arbitrary scale}
Our main question is whether the Lagrangian $L_0^\rho+L^\rho$ can also be
derived by the Higgs mechanism for all $\rho >0$. By the latter we mean
\begin{equation}\label{L-new}
L_0^\rho+L^\rho\simeq
-\frac{1}4\,F_\rho^2+\frac{1}2\,(D_\rho^\mu\Phi_\rho)^*D_{\rho\mu}\Phi_\rho-V_\rho(\Phi_\rho)
+ L_{\mathrm{gf}}^\rho+L_{\mathrm{ghost}}^\rho\ ,
\end{equation}
where $\Phi_\rho,\,D_\rho$ and $V_\rho(\Phi_\rho)$ are obtained from \eqref{geom1}-\eqref{geom2}
by replacing \newline
$(A^\mu,\,B,\,\varphi,\,m,\,m_H,\,\Lambda)$ by
$(A^\mu_\rho,\,B_\rho,\,\varphi_\rho,\,m_\rho,\,m_{H\rho},\,\Lambda_\rho)$
and
\begin{align}\label{L-gf-ghost-rho}
L_{\mathrm{gf}}^\rho & :=-\frac{\Lambda_\rho}{2} \biggl( \d A_\rho +
\frac{m_{B\rho}}{\sqrt{\Lambda_\rho}} B_\rho \biggr)^2\ ,\nonumber\\
L_{\mathrm{ghost}}^\rho& :=\d\tilde u\cdot \d u-m_{u\rho}^2\,\tilde u u
-\frac{\kappa_\rho\,\lambda_{10\rho}\,m_{u\rho}^2}{m_\rho}\,\tilde u u\varphi_\rho\ .
\end{align}
For the property \eqref{L-new} we also say that the model ``can be geometrically interpreted as a spontaneously
broken gauge theory at all scales'' \cite{Duetsch15}. By a straightforward calculation we find that \eqref{L-new}
is equivalent to
\begin{equation}\label{runningparameter-geom}
\lambda_{1\rho}=\lambda_{2\rho}=...=\lambda_{9\rho}=1\ ,\quad\lambda_{11\rho}=\lambda_{12\rho}=0\ .
\end{equation}
To simplify the calculations we assume that initially we are in Feynman gauge: $\Lambda_{\rho=1}=1$.
With that the geometrical interpretability \eqref{runningparameter-geom}
is equivalent to the following relations among the coefficients $e_\rho$:
\begin{align}
\lambda_{1\rho}=1\,\,\,\text{gives}&\quad\quad\quad\frac{1+l_{1\rho}}{1+l_{0\rho}}=
\sqrt{\frac{1+b_{0\rho}}{1+a_{1\rho}}}\ ,\label{e-geom-interpret1}\\
\lambda_{2\rho}=1\,\,\,\text{gives}&\quad\quad\quad l_{2\rho}=l_{1\rho}\ ,\label{e-geom-interpret2}\\
\lambda_{3\rho}=1\,\,\,\text{gives}&\quad\quad\quad\frac{1+l_{3\rho}}{1+l_{0\rho}}=
\frac{1+c_{1\rho}}{1+a_{1\rho}}\ ,\label{e-geom-interpret3}\\
\lambda_{4\rho}=1\,\,\,\text{gives}&\quad\quad\quad\frac{1+l_{4\rho}}{1+l_{3\rho}}=
\frac{1+b_{0\rho}}{1+c_{0\rho}}\ ,\label{e-geom-interpret4}\\
\lambda_{5\rho}=1\,\,\,\text{gives}&\quad\quad\quad\frac{1+l_{5\rho}}{(1+l_{0\rho})^2}=
\frac{1}{1+a_{1\rho}}\ ,\label{e-geom-interpret5}\\
\lambda_{6\rho}=1\,\,\,\text{gives}&\quad\quad\quad\frac{1+l_{6\rho}}{1+l_{5\rho}}=
\frac{1+b_{0\rho}}{1+c_{0\rho}}\ ,\label{e-geom-interpret6}
\end{align}
\begin{align}
\lambda_{7\rho}=1\,\,\,\text{gives}&\quad\quad\quad\frac{1+l_{7\rho}}{(1+l_{0\rho})^2}=
\frac{1+c_{1\rho}}{(1+a_{1\rho})^2}\ ,\label{e-geom-interpret7}\\
\lambda_{8\rho}=1\,\,\,\text{gives}&\quad\quad\quad\frac{1+l_{8\rho}}{1+l_{7\rho}}=
\frac{1+b_{0\rho}}{1+c_{0\rho}}\ ,\label{e-geom-interpret8}\\
\lambda_{9\rho}=1\,\,\,\text{gives}&\quad\quad\quad\frac{1+l_{9\rho}}{1+l_{7\rho}}=
\Bigl(\frac{1+b_{0\rho}}{1+c_{0\rho}}\Bigr)^2\ ,\label{e-geom-interpret9}\\
\lambda_{11\rho}=0\,\,\,\text{gives}&\quad\quad\quad l_{11\rho}=0\ ,\label{e-geom-interpret11}\\
\lambda_{12\rho}=0\,\,\,\text{gives}&\quad\quad\quad b_{2\rho}=
\sqrt{(1+a_{2\rho})(1+b_{1\rho})}-\sqrt{(1+a_{1\rho})(1+b_{0\rho})}\ .\label{e-geom-interpret12}
\end{align}
Combining the equations \eqref{e-geom-interpret3}, \eqref{e-geom-interpret5} and \eqref{e-geom-interpret7}
we obtain
\begin{equation}\label{geom-interpret-crucial}
\frac{1+l_{7\rho}}{1+l_{3\rho}}=\frac{1+l_{5\rho}}{1+l_{0\rho}}\ .
\end{equation}
This condition and \eqref{e-geom-interpret12} are crucial for the geometrical interpretability, as
we will see.
\begin{rem}
BRST-invariance of $L_0+z_\rho(L)$ is a clearly stronger property than the geometrical interpretability
\eqref{L-new}. More precisely: considering the coefficients $e_\rho$ as unknown and assuming that
$s(L_0+z_\rho(L))\simeq 0$, we obtain rather restrictive relations among the coefficients $e_\rho$ which
imply the equations \eqref{e-geom-interpret1}-\eqref{e-geom-interpret12}. Ignoring $k_\rho$, the number of
coefficients $e_\rho$, which are left freely chosable by the BRST-property, is $3$; and for the
geometrical interpretability this number is $9$ -- see \cite{Duetsch15}.
\end{rem}
\section{Physical consistency and perturbative gauge invariance}
\label{sec:stab-PC}
\paragraph{Physical consistency (PC)}
The generic problem of a model containing
spin $1$ fields, is the presence of unphysical fields. A
way to solve this problem in a scattering framework is to construct $S(iL(g))$
such that the following holds. For the asymptotic free fields let $\mathcal{H}_{\mathrm{phys}}$
be the ``subspace'' of physical states. In the adiabatic limit lim $g\to 1$,
$S(iL(g))$ has to induce a well defined operator from $\mathcal{H}_{\mathrm{phys}}$ into itself,
which is the physically relevant $S$-matrix.
To formulate this condition explicitly, let $Q$ be the generator of
the free BRST-transformation $s_0:=s|_{\kappa =0}$:
\begin{equation}
[Q,\phi]^\mp_\star\approx\,i\hbar\, s_0\phi\ ,\quad\phi=A^\mu\,,\,B\,,\,\varphi\,,\,u\,,\,\tilde u\ ,
\end{equation}
where $[\cdot\,,\,\cdot]^\mp_\star$ denotes the graded commutator w.r.t.~the $\star$-product
and $\approx$ means 'equal modulo the free field equations'. With that we may write
$\mathcal{H}_{\mathrm{phys}}:=\frac{\mathrm{ker}\,Q}{\mathrm{ran}\,Q}$, and the mentioned, fundamental condition
on $S(iL(g))$ is equivalent to
\begin{equation}\label{PC}
0\approx [Q,\mathbf{S}[L]]_\star\vert_{\mathrm{ker}\,Q}\equiv
\lim_{\varepsilon\downarrow 0}[Q,S(iL(g_\varepsilon)/\hbar)]_\star\vert_{\mathrm{ker}\,Q}\ ,
\end{equation}
see \cite{Kugo-Ojima,DS2000}. For simplicity we omit the restriction
to $\mathrm{ker}\,Q$ and call the resulting condition ``physical consistency (PC)''.
\paragraph{Stability of PC under the RG-flow}
A main, model-independent result of this paper is that PC is maintained under the RG-flow.
\begin{thm}\label{thm:PC}
Assume that $S_\mathbf{m}(iL(g))$ is renormalized such that the adiabatic limit
$\varepsilon\downarrow 0$ exists and is unique for
$\sigma_\rho\circ S_{\rho^{-1}\mathbf{m}}\circ\sigma_\rho^{-1}(iL(g_\varepsilon))\ $ $\forall\rho > 0$,
and such that $S_\mathbf{m}(iL^\mathbf{m}(g))$ fulfills PC
for all values $m_j>0$ of the masses $\mathbf{m}=(m_j)$. Then, the following holds:
\begin{equation}\label{PC-RG}
\bigl[Q,\mathbf{S}[z_\rho(L)]\bigr]_\star\equiv
\lim_{\varepsilon\downarrow 0}[Q,S(iz_\rho(L)(g_\varepsilon)]_\star\approx 0\ ,\quad\forall\rho >0\ .
\end{equation}
\end{thm}
Hence, at least in this weak form, BRST-invariance of the time-ordered products is stable under the RG-flow.
\begin{proof} As a preparation we explain the construction
of $z_\rho(L)$ and derive \eqref{main-theorem-adlim}. Assuming that
$S$ fulfills the axioms of Epstein-Glaser renormalization, this holds
also for the scaled time-ordered products $\sigma_\rho\circ S\circ\sigma_\rho^{-1}$; therefore,
the Main Theorem \cite{DF04,HW03} applies: there exists
a unique map $Z_\rho\equiv Z_{\rho,\mathbf{m}}$ from the space of local interactions into itself such that
\begin{equation}\label{main-theorem}
\sigma_\rho\circ S_{\rho^{-1}\mathbf{m}}\circ\sigma_\rho^{-1}=S_{\mathbf{m}}\circ Z_{\rho,\mathbf{m}}
\end{equation}
(the lower index $\mathbf{m}$ on $S$ and $Z_\rho$ denotes the masses of the underlying $\star$-product,
i.e.~the masses of the Feynman propagators).
In view of the adiabatic limit we investigate $Z_\rho(iL(g_\varepsilon)/\hbar)$
and take into account that $\d g_\varepsilon(x)\sim \varepsilon$.
From \cite[Prop.~4.3]{DF04} we know that there exist local field polynomials
$p_{k\rho}(L)$ such that
\begin{equation}
Z_\rho(iL(g_\varepsilon)/\hbar)=\frac{i}{\hbar}\Bigl(L(g_\varepsilon)+\sum_{k=2}^\infty\int dx\,\,
p_{k\rho}(L)(x)\,(\kappa g_\varepsilon(x))^k\Bigr)+\mathcal{O}(\varepsilon)\ .
\end{equation}
Obviously, $p_{k\rho}(L)$ is not uniquely determined: one may add
terms of type $\d^a A$, $|a|\geq 1$, where $A$ is a local field polynomial.
Setting
\begin{equation}
z_\rho(L)(g):=\frac{1}{\hbar}\sum_{k=1}^\infty\int dx\,\Bigl(L_k(x)+
p_{k\rho}(L)(x)\Bigr)\,(\kappa g(x))^k\ ,
\end{equation}
where $p_{1\rho}:=0$ and $L_k:=0$ for $k\geq 3$, we obtain
\begin{equation}\label{Z(L)-adlim}
Z_\rho(iL(g_\varepsilon)/\hbar)=i\,z_\rho(L)(g_\varepsilon)+\mathcal{O}(\varepsilon)\ .
\end{equation}
Using this result and (multi-)linearity of the time-ordered products,
we obtain \eqref{main-theorem-adlim}:
\begin{align}\label{MThmadlim}
\sigma_\rho(&\mathbf{S}_{\rho^{-1}\mathbf{m}}[\sigma_\rho^{-1}(L^{\mathbf{m}})]):=
\lim_{\varepsilon\downarrow 0}\sigma_\rho\circ S_{\rho^{-1}\mathbf{m}}\circ\sigma_\rho^{-1}(iL^{\mathbf{m}}(g_\varepsilon))\nonumber\\
& =\lim_{\varepsilon\downarrow 0}S_{\mathbf{m}}\bigl(Z_\rho(iL^{\mathbf{m}}(g_\varepsilon))\bigl)
=\lim_{\varepsilon\downarrow 0}S_{\mathbf{m}}\bigl(i\,z_\rho(L^{\mathbf{m}})(g_\varepsilon)\bigl)=:
\mathbf{S}_{\mathbf{m}}[ z_\rho(L^{\mathbf{m}})]\ .
\end{align}
By assumption the limit exists on the l.h.s.; hence, it exists also on the r.h.s..
With these tools we are able to prove \eqref{PC-RG}:
using the relations
\begin{equation}
\sigma_\rho^{-1}(L^\mathbf{m}(g))=L^{\rho^{-1}\mathbf{m}}(g_{1/\rho})\,\,\,
\quad (\,\text{again}\,\,g_\lambda(x):=g(\lambda x)\,)
\end{equation}
and
\begin{equation}
\sigma_\rho(F\star_{\rho^{-1}\mathbf{m}}G)= \sigma_\rho(F)\star_{\mathbf{m}}\sigma_\rho(G)\ ,\quad
\rho\,\sigma_\rho\circ Q_{\rho^{-1}\mathbf{m}}=Q_{\mathbf{m}}\ ,
\end{equation}
we obtain
\begin{align}\label{Q-zrhoL}
[Q_{\mathbf{m}},S_{\mathbf{m}}(Z_\rho(iL^\mathbf{m}(g_\varepsilon)))]_{\star_{\mathbf{m}}} & =
[Q_{\mathbf{m}},\sigma_\rho\circ S_{\rho^{-1}\mathbf{m}}(iL^{\rho^{-1}\mathbf{m}}(g_{\varepsilon/\rho}))]_{\star_{\mathbf{m}}}\nonumber\\
= \rho\,\sigma_\rho\Bigl([Q_{\rho^{-1}\mathbf{m}},& S_{\rho^{-1}\mathbf{m}}(iL^{\rho^{-1}\mathbf{m}}(g_{\varepsilon/\rho}))
]_{\star_{\rho^{-1}\mathbf{m}}}\Bigr)\ .
\end{align}
By assumption, the adiabatic limit $\varepsilon\downarrow 0$ vanishes for the last expression.
(Due to uniqueness of the adiabatic limit, it does not matter whether we perform this
limit with $g$ or $g_{1/\rho}$.) With that and with \eqref{Z(L)-adlim} we conclude
$$
0\approx\lim_{\varepsilon\downarrow 0}\,[Q,S(Z_\rho(iL(g_\varepsilon)))]_\star=
\lim_{\varepsilon\downarrow 0}\,[Q,S(i\,z_\rho(L)(g_\varepsilon))]_\star =
\bigl[Q,\mathbf{S}[z_\rho(L)]\bigr]_\star\ .\eqno\qedhere
$$
\end{proof}
\paragraph{Perturbative gauge invariance (PGI)}
For the initial model $S(iL(g))$ we admit all renormalization prescriptions which fulfill the
Epstein-Glaser axioms \cite{EG73,DF04} and
\textit{perturbative gauge invariance (PGI)} \cite{DHKS94,DS99,Scharf2001,DGBSV10}.
The latter is a somewhat stronger version of PC, which is formulated \textit{before} the adiabatic
limit $g\to 1$ is taken.
In detail, PGI is the condition that to the given interaction $L(g)$ \eqref{L(g)}
there exists a ``$Q$-vertex''
\begin{equation}
\mathcal{ P}^{\nu}(g;f):=\int dx\,\Bigl(\kappa \,P^\nu_1(x)+\kappa^2g(x)\,P^\nu_2(x)\Bigr) f(x) ,
\end{equation}
(where $g,f\in\mathcal{D}(\RR^4)$ and $P_1,\,P_2$ are local field polynomials)
and a renormalization of the time-ordered products such that
\begin{equation}\label{PGI}
[Q,S\bigl(i\, L(g)\bigr)]_\star\approx \frac{d}{d\eta}\vert_{\eta =0}\,
S\bigl(i\, L(g)+\eta\, \mathcal{P}^\nu(g;\d_\nu g)\bigr)\ .
\end{equation}
The latter equation is understood in the sense of formal power series in $\kappa$ and $\hbar$.
That PGI implies PC, is easy to see (on the heuristic level on which we treat
the adiabatic limit in this paper): the r.h.s.~of \eqref{PGI} vanishes in the adiabatic limit,
since it is linear
in the $Q$-vertex, the latter is linear in $\d_\nu g$ and $\d_\nu g_\varepsilon\sim\varepsilon$.
Requiring PGI, renormalizability and some obvious properties as Poincar{\'e} invariance and
relevant discrete symmetries, the Lagrangian of the Standard model of electroweak interactions
has been derived in \cite{DS99,ADS99}. In this way the
presence of Higgs particles and chirality of fermionic interactions
can be understood without recourse to any geometrical or
group theoretical concepts (see also \cite{StoraVienna1997}).
It is well-known that the $U(1)$-Higgs model is anomaly-free.
Hence, our initial model can be renormalized such that PGI \eqref{PGI} holds true
for all values of $m,m_H>0$. Using Theorem \ref{thm:PC}, we conclude
that this model is consistent at all scales.
\section{Higgs mechanism at all scales to 1-loop order}\label{sec:1-loop}
In this section we explain, how one can fulfill the validity of the Higgs mechanism at all scales,
i.e.~the equations \eqref{e-geom-interpret1}-\eqref{e-geom-interpret12}, on 1-loop level.
\subsection{The two ways to renormalize}
\label{ssec:explicit-comput}
To write the fundamental formula \eqref{main-theorem} to $n$-th order, we use the chain rule:
\begin{align}\label{eq:Zn}
&Z_{\rho,\mathbf{m}}^{(n)}\bigl(L(g)^{\otimes n}\bigr)=\sigma_\rho \circ T_{n\,\mathbf{m}/\rho}\bigl(
(\sigma_\rho^{-1}\,L(g))^{\otimes n}\bigr)-T_{n\,\mathbf{m}}\bigl(L(g)^{\otimes n}\bigr)\notag\\
&\quad\quad -\sum_{P\in\mathrm{Part}(\{1,...,n\},\,n>|P|>1} T_{|P|\,\mathbf{m}}\bigl(\otimes_{I\in P}
Z_{\rho,\mathbf{m}}^{|I|}(L(g)^{\otimes|I|})\bigr)\ ,
\end{align}
where $Z_\rho^{(n)}:=Z_\rho^{(n)}(0)$ is the $n$-th derivative of $Z_\rho(F)$ at $F=0$ and
the two terms with $|P|=n$ and $|P|=1$, resp., are explicitly written out.
We are now going to investigate the contribution to the r.h.s.~of \eqref{eq:Zn} of a
primitive divergent diagram $\Gamma$, i.e. $\Gamma$ has singular order%
\footnote{\label{fn:extension} For $t\in\mathcal{D}'(\RR^l)$ or $t\in\mathcal{D}'(\RR^l\setminus\{0\})$,
the singular order is defined as $\omega(t):=\mathrm{sd}(t)-l$,
where $\mathrm{sd}(t)$ is Steinmann's scaling degree of $t$,
which measures the UV-behaviour of $t$ \cite{Ste71}. In the Epstein-Glaser framework,
renormalization is the extension of a distribution
$t^\circ\in\mathcal{D}'(\RR^l\setminus\{0\})$ to a distribution $t\in
\mathcal{D}'(\RR^l)$, with the condition that $\mathrm{sd}(t)=\mathrm{sd}(t^{\circ})$.
In the case $\mathrm{sd}(t^{\circ})<l$,
the extension is unique, due to the scaling degree requirement, and obtained by
``direct extension'', see \cite[Theorem 5.2]{BF00}, \cite[Appendix B]{DF04} and
\cite[Theorem 4.1]{DFKR14}.}
$\omega(\Gamma)\geq 0$ and does not contain any subdiagram $\Gamma_1\subset\Gamma$ with
less vertices and with $\omega(\Gamma_1)\geq 0$. For such a diagram, the expression in
the second line of \eqref{eq:Zn} vanishes.
Denoting the contribution of $\Gamma$ to $T_{n\,\mathbf{m}}\bigl(L(g)^{\otimes n}\bigr)$ by
$$
\int dx_1\ldots dx_n\,\,t_\mathbf{m}^\Gamma(x_1-x_n,\ldots,x_{n-1}-x_n)\,P^\Gamma(x_1,\ldots,x_n)
\,\prod_{k=1}^n(\kappa g(x_k))^{j_k}\
$$
(where $P^\Gamma(x_1,\ldots,x_n)$ is a, in general non-local, field monomial and the values of
$j_1,\ldots,j_n\in\{1,2\}$ depend on $\Gamma$), the computation of the contribution of $\Gamma$
to $Z_{\rho,\mathbf{m}}^{(n)}\bigl(L(g)^{\otimes n}\bigr)$ amounts to the computation of
\begin{equation}\label{Ga-scaling}
\rho^{D^\Gamma}\,t_{\mathbf{m}/\rho}^\Gamma(\rho y)-t_\mathbf{m}^\Gamma(y)\ ,
\end{equation}
where $D^\Gamma:=\omega(\Gamma)+4(n-1)\in\NN$ and $y:=(x_1-x_n,\ldots,x_{n-1}-x_n)$.
For simplicity we assume that $0\leq\omega(\Gamma)<2$; this assumption is satisfied for
all 1-loop calculations which are done in \cite{Duetsch15} and whose results are used
in this paper.
Applying the scaling and mass expansion (``sm-expansion'')
\cite{Duetsch14}, we then know that $t_\mathbf{m}^\Gamma$ is of the form
\begin{equation}\label{Ga-sm}
t_\mathbf{m}^\Gamma(y)=t^\Gamma(y)+r_\mathbf{m}^\Gamma(y)\ ,\quad r_\mathbf{m}^\Gamma=\mathcal{O}(\mathbf{m}^2)\ ,
\quad \omega(r_\mathbf{m}^\Gamma)<0\ ,
\end{equation}
where $t^\Gamma:=t_{\mathbf{m}=\mathbf{0}}^\Gamma$ (i.e.~all Feynman propagators are replaced by their
massless version). The remainder scales homogeneously,
$\rho^{D^\Gamma}\,r_{\mathbf{m}/\rho}^\Gamma(\rho y)=r_\mathbf{m}^\Gamma(y)$, because it can be renormalized by
direct extension (see footnote \ref{fn:extension}).
To investigate $\rho^{D^\Gamma}\,t^\Gamma(\rho y)-t^\Gamma(y)$, we omit the upper index $\Gamma$
and use the notations $\omega:=\omega(\Gamma)$, $l:=(n-1)$ and $Y_j:=y_j^2-i0$. We start with the
unrenormalized version $t^\circ\in\mathcal{D}'(\RR^{4l}\setminus\{0\})$ of $t:=t^\Gamma$, which
scales homogeneously:
\begin{equation}
\rho^{\omega+4l}\,t^\circ(\rho y)=t^\circ(y)\ .
\end{equation}
We work with an analytic regularization \cite{Hollands08}:
\begin{equation}
t^{\zeta\circ}(y):=t^\circ(y)\,(M^{2l}Y_1\ldots Y_l)^\zeta\ ,
\end{equation}
where $\zeta\in\CC\setminus\{0\}$ with $|\zeta|$ sufficiently small,
and $M>0$ is a renormalization mass scale. $t^{\zeta\circ}$ scales also
homogeneously -- by the regularization we gain that the degree (of the scaling)
is $(\omega+4l-2l\zeta)$, which is not an integer. Therefore,
the homogeneous extension $t^\zeta \in\mathcal{D}'(\RR^{4l})$ is unique and can explicitly be written
down by differential renormalization \cite[Sect.~IV.D]{DFKR14}.
Using minimal subtraction for the limit $\zeta\to 0$ we obtain an admissible extension
$t^M \in\mathcal{D}'(\RR^{4l})$ of $t^\circ$ \cite[Corollary 4.4]{DFKR14}:
\begin{align}\label{t-M}
t^M(y)=\frac{(-1)^\omega}{\omega!}&\sum_{r_1\ldots r_{\omega+1}}
\d_{y_{r_{\omega+1}}}\ldots\d_{y_{r_1}}\Bigl[\frac{1}{2l}
\Bigl(\overline{y_{r_1}\ldots y_{r_{\omega+1}}\,t^\circ(y)\,\log(M^{2l}Y_1\ldots Y_l)}\Bigr)\notag\\
&+(\sum_{j=1}^\omega\frac{1}{j})\Bigl(\overline{y_{r_1}\ldots y_{r_{\omega+1}}\,t^\circ(y)}\Bigr)\Bigr]\ ,
\end{align}
where $\sum_r \d_{y_r}(y_r\ldots):=\sum_r \d^{y_r}_\mu(y_r^\mu\ldots)$ and the overline denotes the direct
extension. By means of \eqref{Ga-sm} we obtain the corresponding distribution of
the massive model: $t_\mathbf{m}^M:=t^M(y)+r_\mathbf{m}$. In the following we use that
$$
\frac{(-1)^\omega}{\omega!}\sum_{r_1\ldots r_{\omega+1}}\d_{y_{r_{\omega+1}}}\ldots\d_{y_{r_1}}
\Bigl(\overline{y_{r_1}\ldots y_{r_{\omega+1}}\,t^\circ(y)}\Bigr)
=\sum_{|a|=\omega}C_a\,\d^a\delta(y)
$$
for some $M$-independent numbers $C_a\in\CC$, as explained after formula (104) in \cite{DFKR14}.
Whether the expression \eqref{Ga-scaling} vanishes depends on the following choice:
\begin{itemize}
\item[(A)] if we choose for $M$ a fixed mass scale, which is independent of $m,m_H$,
homogeneous scaling is broken:
\begin{equation}\label{diffren-scal}
\rho^{\omega+4l}\,t_{\mathbf{m}/\rho}^M(\rho y)-t_\mathbf{m}^M(y)=
\rho^{\omega+4l}\,t^M(\rho y)-t^M(y)=\log\rho\,\,\sum_{|a|=\omega}C_a\,\d^a\delta(y)\ ,
\end{equation}
The breaking term is unique, i.e.~independent of $M$;
therefore, we may admit different values
of $M$ for different diagrams, however, all $M$'s must be independent of $m,m_H$.
\item[(B)] In contrast, choosing $M$ such that it is subject to our scaling transformation, i.e.
$M:=\alpha_1 m+\alpha_2 m_H$ where $(\alpha_1,\alpha_2)\in(\RR^2\setminus\{(0,0)\})$
may be functions of $\tfrac{m}{m_H}$, the diagram $\Gamma$ does not contribute to the RG-flow:
\begin{equation}\label{diffren-scal-1}
\rho^{\omega+4l}\,t_{\mathbf{m}/\rho}^{M/\rho}(\rho y)-t_\mathbf{m}^M(y)=
\rho^{\omega+4l}\,t^{M/\rho}(\rho y)-t^M(y)=0\ .
\end{equation}
\end{itemize}
\begin{rem}\label{AB-PGI}
The requirement that the initial $U(1)$-Higgs model fulfills PGI,
is neither in conflict with method (A) nor with method (B), for the following
reason: we require PGI only for the initial model.
Now, working at one fixed scale, the renormalization constant $M$
appearing in \eqref{t-M} may have any value $M>0$ for both methods (A)
and (B) and, hence, one may choose it such that PGI is satisfied. These methods only prescribe
how $M$ behaves under a scaling transformation: using (A) it remains unchanged, using (B) it
is also scaled: $M\mapsto\rho^{-1}M$.
\end{rem}
\subsection{Equality of certain coefficients to 1-loop order}
\label{ssec:e=e}
We explain the basic idea in terms of the two diagrams
\begin{align*}
t_{1\,\mathbf{m}}^\circ(y):=&\omega_0\Bigl(T_2(A^\mu\varphi(x_1)\otimes A^\nu\varphi(x_2))\Bigr)=-\hbar^2g^{\mu\nu}\,
\Delta^F_m(y)\,\Delta^F_{m_H}(y)\ ,\\
t_{2\,\mathbf{m}}^\circ(y):=&\omega_0\Bigl(T_2(A^\mu B(x_1)\otimes A^\nu B(x_2))\Bigr)=-\hbar^2g^{\mu\nu}\,
(\Delta^F_m(y))^2\ ,
\end{align*}
$t_{1\,\mathbf{m}}^\circ , t_{2\,\mathbf{m}}^\circ\in\mathcal{D}^\prime(\RR^{4}\setminus\{0\})$, where
$\omega_0$ denotes the vacuum state and $y:=x_1-x_2$.
These diagrams are related by the exchange of an inner $\varphi$-line
with an inner $B$-line. The essential point is that in the sm-expansion of these two distributions,
\begin{equation}\label{sm-1-2}
t_{j\,\mathbf{m}}^\circ(y)=t_{j}^\circ(y)+r_{j\,\mathbf{m}}^\circ(y)\ ,
\quad r_{j\,\mathbf{m}}^\circ =\mathcal{O}(\mathbf{m}^2)\ ,
\quad \omega(r_{j\,\mathbf{m}}^\circ)<0\ ,\quad j=1,2\ ,
\end{equation}
the first term (which is the corresponding massless distribution) is the same:
$t_{1}^\circ(y)=(D^F(y))^2=t_{2}^\circ(y)$.
Renormalization is done by extending each term on the r.h.s.~of \eqref{sm-1-2} individually and
by composing these extensions: $t_{j\,\mathbf{m}}:=t_{j}+r_{j\,\mathbf{m}}\in\mathcal{D}^\prime(\RR^{4})$.
For the remainders $r_{j\,\mathbf{m}}^\circ$ the direct extension applies (see footnote \ref{fn:extension}),
which maintains homogeneous scaling: $\rho^4\,r_{j\,\mathbf{m}/\rho}(\rho y)=r_{j\,\mathbf{m}}(y)$.
We conclude: if we renormalize $t_{1}^\circ$ and $t_{2}^\circ$ both by method (A) or
both by method (B), we obtain
\begin{align*}
\rho^4\,t_{1\,\mathbf{m}/\rho}(\rho y)-t_{1\,\mathbf{m}}(y)&=\rho^4\,t_{1}(\rho y)-t_{1}(y)\\
&=\rho^4\,t_{2}(\rho y)-t_{2}(y)=\rho^4\,t_{2\,\mathbf{m}/\rho}(\rho y)-t_{2\,\mathbf{m}}(y)\ .
\end{align*}
We point out that different renormalization mass scales $M$ for $t_{1}$ and $t_{2}$
are admitted, only their behaviour under the scaling transformation must be the same.
Therefore, this renormalization prescription is compatible with PGI of the initial $U(1)$-Higgs model.
Renormalizing certain Feynman diagrams, which go over into each other
by exchanging $B\leftrightarrow\varphi$ for some lines, by the same method (in this sense) --
also triangle and square diagrams with derivatives are concerned -- we obtain that some of the coefficients
$e_\rho$ agree to 1-loop order:
\begin{equation}\label{e-geom-simplified}
c^{(1)}_{0\rho}=b^{(1)}_{0\rho}\ ,\,\,\, l^{(1)}_{1\rho}=l^{(1)}_{2\rho}\ ,\,\,\,
l^{(1)}_{3\rho}=l^{(1)}_{4\rho}\ ,\,\,\, l^{(1)}_{5\rho}=l^{(1)}_{6\rho}\ ,\,\,\,
l^{(1)}_{7\rho}=l^{(1)}_{8\rho}=l^{(1)}_{9\rho}\ ,
\end{equation}
for details see \cite{Duetsch15}.
With that the equations \eqref{e-geom-interpret2}, \eqref{e-geom-interpret4}, \eqref{e-geom-interpret6}
and \eqref{e-geom-interpret8}-\eqref{e-geom-interpret9} are fulfilled.
In addition, the condition
\begin{equation}\label{l11=0}
l^{(1)}_{11\rho}=0\ ,
\end{equation}
which is \eqref{e-geom-interpret11} to 1-loop order, can be derived from
the stability of PC under the RG-flow, by selecting from \eqref{PC-RG} the local terms
which are $\sim A^2\,A\d u$ and by using results of Appendix A in \cite{DS2000}.
\subsection{Changing the running interaction by finite renormalization}
\label{ssec:fin-ren}
On our way to fulfil the equations \eqref{e-geom-interpret1}-\eqref{e-geom-interpret12}
on 1-loop level, we may use that the following finite
renormalizations are admitted by the axioms of causal perturbation theory
\cite{EG73,DF04,Duetsch14} and that they preserve PGI of the initial model:
to $T_2\bigl(L_1(x_1)\otimes L_1(x_2)\bigr)$ we may add
\begin{align}\label{fin-ren-1-1}
\hbar^2 &\,\Bigl(\alpha_1\,(\d\varphi)^2(x_1)
+\alpha_2\,m_H^2\,\varphi^2(x_1)+\alpha_3\,F^2(x_1)+\alpha_4\,(\d A+mB)^2\notag\\
& +\alpha_5\,\bigl(-m^2\,B^2(x_1)+(\d B)^2(x_1)\bigr)+\alpha_6\bigl(m^2\,A^2(x_1)-(\d A)^2(x_1)\bigr)
\notag\\
& +\alpha_7\,m^2\,\bigl(-2\,\tilde u u(x_1)+A^2(x_1)-B^2(x_1)\bigr)\Bigr)\,\delta(x_1-x_2)\,\log\tfrac{m}{M}\ ,
\end{align}
where $\alpha_1,\ldots,\alpha_7\in\CC$ are arbitrary.
These finite renormalizations modify the
1-loop coefficients $e^{(1)}_\rho$ appearing in $z_\rho(L)$ \eqref{z(L)} as follows:
\begin{align}
a_{0\rho}^{(1)}&\mapsto a_{0\rho}^{(1)}+2i\,\alpha_3\,\log\rho\ ,\label{fin-re-a0}\\
a_{1\rho}^{(1)}&\mapsto a_{1\rho}^{(1)}-i\,(\alpha_6+\alpha_7)\,\log\rho\ ,\label{fin-re-a1}\\
a_{2\rho}^{(1)}&\mapsto a_{2\rho}^{(1)}+i\,(\alpha_4-\alpha_6)\,\log\rho\ ,\label{fin-re-a2}\\
b_{0\rho}^{(1)}&\mapsto b_{0\rho}^{(1)}-i\,\alpha_5\,\log\rho\ ,\label{fin-re-b0}\\
b_{1\rho}^{(1)}&\mapsto b_{1\rho}^{(1)}+i\,(\alpha_4-\alpha_5-\alpha_7)\,\log\rho\ ,\label{fin-re-b1}\\
b_{2\rho}^{(1)}&\mapsto b_{2\rho}^{(1)}+i\,\alpha_4\,\log\rho\ ,\label{fin-re-b2}\\
c_{0\rho}^{(1)}&\mapsto c_{0\rho}^{(1)}-i\,\alpha_1\,\log\rho\ ,\label{fin-re-c0}\\
c_{1\rho}^{(1)}&\mapsto c_{1\rho}^{(1)}+i\,\alpha_2\,\log\rho\ ,\label{fin-re-c1}\\
c_{2\rho}^{(1)}&\mapsto c_{2\rho}^{(1)}-i\,\alpha_7\,\log\rho\ ,\label{fin-re-c2}
\end{align}
the other coefficients remain unchanged.
We did not find any further finite renormalizations,
which fufill, besides the already mentioned conditions, the requirements \\
- that they do not add ``by hand'' novel kind of terms to $(z_\rho(L)-L)$ (see \eqref{z(L)})
as e.g.~terms $\sim\d\tilde u\d u$ or $\sim m\,\tilde u u\varphi$, and\\
- that the equations \eqref{e-geom-simplified} are preserved.\\
See \cite{Duetsch15} for details.
\subsection{How to fulfill the Higgs mechanism at all scales}\label{ssec:geom-all-scales}
\label{ssec:geom-interpret}
There are two necessary conditions for the Higgs mechanism at all scales, which
are crucial, since they cannot be fulfilled by finite renormalizations.
\paragraph{Verification of the first crucial necessary condition}
The condition \eqref{geom-interpret-crucial} reads to 1-loop level
\begin{equation}\label{geom-interpret-crucial-1}
l_{7\rho}^{(1)}-l_{3\rho}^{(1)}=l_{5\rho}^{(1)}-l_{0\rho}^{(1)}\ .
\end{equation}
Since the admissible finite renormalizations \eqref{fin-ren-1-1} do not modify the coefficients
$l_{j\rho}^{(1)}$, there is no possibility to fulfill \eqref{geom-interpret-crucial-1} in this way.
However, computing explicitly the relevant coefficients $l_{j\rho}^{(1)}$ by
using the renormalization method (A) for all contributing terms, we find that
\eqref{geom-interpret-crucial-1} holds indeed true. This computation, which is given in \cite{Duetsch15},
involves cancellations of square- and triangle-diagrams -- this
shows that \eqref{geom-interpret-crucial-1} is of a deeper kind than the equalities
derived in Sect.~\ref{ssec:e=e}.
The identity \eqref{geom-interpret-crucial-1} holds also if certain classes of corresponding diagrams
are renormalized by method (B).
\paragraph{How to fulfill the second crucial necessary condition} The condition
\eqref{e-geom-interpret12} reads to 1-loop order
\begin{equation}
b_{2\rho}^{(1)}=\tfrac{1}2 \bigl(a_{2\rho}^{(1)}+b_{1\rho}^{(1)}-a_{1\rho}^{(1)}-b_{0\rho}^{(1)}\bigr)\ .
\label{geom-int-crucial}
\end{equation}
Performing the finite renormalizations \eqref{fin-ren-1-1}, i.e.~inserting
\eqref{fin-re-a0}-\eqref{fin-re-c2} into \eqref{geom-int-crucial}, we find that all
$\alpha_j$ drop out -- that is, the condition \eqref{geom-int-crucial} cannot be fulfilled by
means of these finite renormalizations.
Computing the explicit values for the coefficients
$a_{j\rho}^{(1)},\,b_{j\rho}^{(1)}$ by using method (A) (see \cite{Duetsch15}), we find
that \eqref{geom-int-crucial} does not hold.
Hence, using method (A) throughout, we have $\lambda_{12\rho}\not= 0$, i.e.~the geometrical interpretation
\eqref{L-new} is violated by terms $\sim A\d B$.
However, we can fulfill the condition \eqref{geom-int-crucial} by switching the method from (A) to (B)
for all diagrams contributing to $b_{1\rho}^{(1)}$ and a part of the diagrams contributing to $a_{1\rho}^{(1)}$
\cite{Duetsch15}. (This switch concerns also all diagrams
contributing to $a_{0\rho}^{(1)}$, hence we obtain $a_{0\rho}^{(1)}=0$.)
\paragraph{A family of solutions of the Higgs mechanism at all scales}
The conditions \eqref{e-geom-interpret1}-\eqref{e-geom-interpret12} can be solved to 1-loop order as
follows: initially we renormalize all diagrams by using method (A), except for the diagrams just mentioned,
for which we use method (B) to fulfill the second crucial necessary condition \eqref{geom-int-crucial}.
Then we take into account the possibility to modify the coefficients $e_{\rho}^{(1)}$ by
finite renormalizations \eqref{fin-re-a0}-\eqref{fin-re-c2}. This procedure yields the
following family of solutions:
\begin{align*}
&a_{0\rho}^{(1)}=2\beta_1\,L_\rho\ ,\quad a_{1\rho}^{(1)}=-4\,L_\rho\ ,\quad
a_{2\rho}^{(1)}=(\beta_2-\beta_3)\,L_\rho\ ,\\
&b_{0\rho}^{(1)}=c_{0\rho}^{(1)}=(2+2l_1)\,L_\rho\ ,\quad
b_{1\rho}^{(1)}=(4+2l_1+\beta_2+\beta_3)\,L_\rho\ ,\\
&b_{2\rho}^{(1)}=(3+\beta_2)\,L_\rho\ ,\quad
c_{1\rho}^{(1)}=-\Bigl(6\frac{m^2}{m_H^2}+5\frac{m_H^2}{m^2}\Bigr)\,L_\rho\ ,
\quad c_{2\rho}^{(1)}=(-1+\beta_3)\,L_\rho\
\end{align*}
\begin{align}\label{e-part-solu}
&l_{0\rho}^{(1)}=-3\,L_\rho\ ,\quad l_{1\rho}^{(1)}=l_{2\rho}^{(1)}=:l_1\,L_\rho\ ,\quad
l_{3\rho}^{(1)}=l_{4\rho}^{(1)}=\Bigl(1-6\frac{m^2}{m_H^2}-5\frac{m_H^2}{m^2}\Bigr)\,L_\rho\ ,\notag\\
&l_{5\rho}^{(1)}=l_{6\rho}^{(1)}=-2\,L_\rho\ ,\quad
l_{7\rho}^{(1)}=l_{8\rho}^{(1)}=l_{9\rho}^{(1)}=\Bigl(2-6\frac{m^2}{m_H^2}-5\frac{m_H^2}{m^2}\Bigr)\,
L_\rho
\end{align}
and $l_{11\rho}^{(1)}=0$,
where $L_\rho:=\tfrac{1}{8\pi^2}\,\log\rho$, the number $l_1$
is obtained on computing $l_{1\rho}^{(1)}=:l_1\,L_\rho$
by method (A), and $\beta_1:=i8\pi^2\,\alpha_3,\,\,\beta_2:=i8\pi^2\,\alpha_4,\,\,
\beta_3:=i8\pi^2\,\alpha_6=-i8\pi^2\,\alpha_7\in\CC$ are parameters with arbitrary values.
The family \eqref{e-part-solu} is by far not the general solution of the conditions
\eqref{e-geom-interpret1}-\eqref{e-geom-interpret12}; in particular, there is the trivial
solution $z_\rho(L)=\tfrac{1}{\hbar}\,(L+\mathcal{O}(\hbar^2))$ (i.e. $e_{\rho}^{(1)}=0\,\,\forall e$),
which is obtained by renormalizing all 1-loop-diagrams by method (B).
To 1-loop order one can even find a non-trivial solution of the clearly stronger property of
BRST-invariance of $(L_0+z_\rho(L))$; but this requires a very specific combination of the methods
(A) and (B) for the various 1-loop diagrams and suitable finite renormalizations.
Hence, in general, $s(L_0+z_\rho(L))$ is \textit{not} $\simeq 0$, and also
$s_0L_0$ is \textit{not} $\simeq 0$; in particular these two statements
hold for the family \eqref{e-part-solu} -- see \cite{Duetsch15}.
\subsection{Frequently used renormalization schemes}
In conventional momentum space renormalization a frequently used renormalization scheme is
dimensional regularization with minimal subtraction, which preserves BRST-invariance generically.
Applied to the 1-loop diagrams of our initial model, this property implies
that the resulting time-ordered products fulfill PGI.%
\footnote{We are not aware of a proof of this statement, but it is very plausible.
A corresponding statement for higher loop diagrams involves a partial
adiabatic limit, because
such diagrams contain inner vertices, which are integrated out with $g(x)=1$ in
conventional momentum space renormalization -- but PGI is formulated \textit{before}
the adiabatic limit $g\to 1$ is taken.}
Dimensional regularization needs a mass scale $M>0$; which remains in the formulas when
removing the regularization by using minimal subtraction, and plays the role of the
renormalization mass scale. Usually $M$ is chosen according to method (A); and the minimal
subtraction prescription forbids to perform any finite renormalization.
Therefore, using this prescription, the Higgs mechanism is not applicable at an arbitrary
scale, because the second crucial necessary condition \eqref{geom-int-crucial} is violated.
Relaxing this prescription by admitting the finite PGI-preserving renormalizations
\eqref{fin-re-a0}-\eqref{fin-re-c2}, the violation of \eqref{geom-int-crucial} cannot
be removed.
Another state independent renormalization scheme is the central solution of Epstein and
Glaser \cite{EG73}. (For 1-loop diagrams this scheme corresponds to BPHZ-subtraction
at $p=0$.) Since the subtraction point $p=0$ is scaling invariant, the central solution
maintains homogeneous scaling (w.r.t. $(x,\mathbf{m})\to (\rho x,\mathbf{m}/\rho)$;
cf.~\cite[Sec.~2.3]{Duetsch14}); hence, the pertinent RG-flow is trivial.
In the conventional literature one meets also state dependent renormalization
conditions: e.g.~in the adiabatic limit
the vacuum expectation values of certain time-ordered products must agree with the
``experimentally'' known values for the masses of stable particles in the
vacuum, and analogous conditions for parameters of certain vacuum correlation functions.
Since ``experimental'' results are not subject to our scaling transformation,
a lot of diagrams are renormalized by method (A), if we use such a scheme.
To 1-loop level, the validity of the Higgs mechanism at all scales amounts then mainly
to the question: is it nevertheless possible to fulfill the second crucial necessary
condition \eqref{geom-int-crucial}, which requires to renormalize certain diagrams
by method (B)?
\section{Summary and conclusions}
In the Epstein-Glaser framework the obvious way to define the RG-flow is to use the Main Theorem
in the adiabatic limit \cite{PS82,HW03,DF04,BDF09}: the effect of a scaling transformation
(scaling with $\rho >0$) can equivalently be expressed by a renormalization of the interaction:
$L\mapsto z_\rho(L)$. The so defined RG-flow $\rho\mapsto z_\rho(L)$ depends on the choice of the
renormalization mass scale(s) $M>0$ for the various UV-divergent Feynman diagrams:
if $M$ is subject to our scaling transformation (method (B)) -- e.g.~the mass of
one of the basic fields -- the pertinent diagram does not contribute to the RG-flow.
In contrast, if $M$ is a fixed mass scale (method (A)), the corresponding diagram yields a unique
(i.e.~$M$-independent), non-vanishing contribution.
Performing the renormalization of the wave functions, masses, gauge-fixing parameter and coupling
parameters, we obtain a description of the scaled model $L_0+z_\rho(L)$ ($L_0$ denotes the free
Lagrangian) by a new Lagrangian $L_0^\rho+L^\rho$, which has essentially the same form as the original
one, $L_0+L$; but the basic fields and the parameters are $\rho$-dependent.
The title of this paper can be reformulated as follows: is the new Lagrangian $L_0^\rho+L^\rho$
derivable by the Higgs mechanism for all $\rho >0$?
We have investigated this question for the $U(1)$-Higgs model to 1-loop order.
We only admit renormalizations of the initial model which fulfill a suitable form of BRST-invariance
of the time-ordered products -- we work with PGI \eqref{PGI}. The answer depends not only on the
choice of the renormalization method ((A) or (B)) for the various 1-loop Feynman diagrams; the RG-flow can
also be modified by finite, PGI-preserving renormalizations \eqref{fin-ren-1-1} of the initial model.
Using this non-uniqueness, we have shown that one can achieve that
the Higgs mechanism is possible at all scales; one can even fulfill
the much stronger condition of BRST-invariance of $L_0+z_\rho(L)$.
But this requires a quite (Higgs mechanism) or very (BRST-invariance) specific
prescription for the choice of the renormalization method ((A) or (B)) for the various
Feynman diagrams, and for the finite renormalizations. If one uses always method
(A) -- minimal subtraction is of this kind -- the geometrical interpretation is violated
by terms $\sim A\d B$; weakening this prescription by admitting finite PGI-preserving
renormalizations, these $A\d B$-terms cannot be removed.
If one accepts the Higgs mechanism as
a fundamental principle explaining the origin of mass at all scales (although it is
not understood in a pure QFT framework), our results exclude quite a lot of
renormalization schemes, in particular minimal subtraction.
On the other hand we give a model-independent proof, which uses rather
weak assumptions, that the RG-flow is compatible with
a weak form of BRST-invariance of the time-ordered products, namely PC (Theorem \ref{thm:PC}).
However, in \cite{Duetsch15} it is shown that the
somewhat stronger property of PGI gets lost under the RG-flow in general,
and in particular if one uses a renormalization prescription corresponding to minimal subtraction.
\subsection*{Acknowledgment}
During working at this paper the author was mainly at the Max Planck Institute
for Mathematics in the Sciences, Leipzig; he thanks Eberhard Zeidler for the invitations to
Leipzig and for valuable discussions. In addition, the author profitted from invitations to give
a talk about the topic of this paper at the workshop
``Algebraic Quantum Field Theory: Its status and its future'' at the Erwin Schr\"oder Institute in Vienna
(19.-23.05.2014) and at the conference ``Quantum Mathematical Physics'' in Regensburg (29.09.-02.10.2014).
The author thanks also the Vicerrector{\'i}a de Investigaci{\'o}n of the
Universidad de Costa Rica for financial support.
The question in the title of this paper was found during innumerable discussions with
J\"urgen Tolksdorf about his geometrical derivation of a value for the Higgs mass.
The author profitted also a lot from stimulating discussions with Klaus Fredenhagen,
Jos{\'e} M. Gracia-Bond{\'i}a, Bert Schroer, G\"unter Scharf, Klaus Sibold and Joseph~C. V\'arilly.
|
\section{Introduction}
Investigations by Zocchi and collaborators \cite{zocchi1,zocchi2,zocchi4,zocchi3} of the dynamics of folded proteins under the influence of a sinusoidally modulated force provide insight into the mechanical response of those molecules to external forces. These investigations probe both the interactions and the dynamics associated with conformational changes in proteins. The latter aspect of the work promises to enhance our understanding of the action of proteins, since conformational adjustments, particularly substantial alterations in the tertiary structure of these molecules, are central to their action in key biological settings \cite{whitford,physcell}.
In the experimental system studied by Zocchi \textit{ et. al.} a collection of guanylate kinase enzymes tether 20 nm gold nano-particles to a planar gold substrate through Cysteins that are mutagenically introduced into those enzymes. An oscillating electrophoretic force, generated by applying an AC voltage between the gold substrate and a parallel electrode, drives the charged gold nano-particles; the motion of those nano-particles is then measured with the use of evanescent wave scattering. The large number of gold nano particles in the sample that participate in the motion allow for the detection of displacements that are considerably smaller than thermal motion would predict. Those displacements map directly onto the deformation of the enzymes.
A key finding that emerges from these investigations is the existence of a relatively abrupt crossover as the driving force increases, from elastic response to a response that is dominantly viscous. This crossover is described as a ``viscoelastic transition.'' Reference \cite{zocchi3} discusses the nature of the transition and describes two response regimes. First, when the displacement is small, the most accurate underlying model of the enzyme appears to be a Hookean spring, for which the equation of motion is simply $x(t) = f(t)/k$, where $f(t)$ is the applied sinusoidal force.
This representation of the protein characterizes its deformation in terms of a single collective coordinate, $x(t)$, and neglects both inertial and dissipative effects. On the other hand, for sufficiently large driving force, the motion is described in terms of a Maxwellian model of a dissipative system \cite{Lakes}, schematically displayed in Fig. \ref{fig:models}.
\begin{figure}[htbp]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=2.5in]{models.pdf}
\caption{Two simple models for a viscoelastic system, along with a model for a system governed entirely by viscosity. The springs have spring constants equal to $k$, and the viscous coefficient for the dash pots is $\gamma$. }
\label{fig:models}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
The equations of motion that govern this system are
\begin{eqnarray}
\gamma \frac{dy(t)}{dt} & = & f(t) \label{eq:meq1} \\
x(t) &=& y(t) + \frac{\gamma}{k} \frac{dy(t)}{dt} \label{eq:meq2}
\end{eqnarray}
where $x(t)$ once again tracks the deformation of the enzyme, which is directly related to the displacement of the gold nano particle, while $y(t)$ is an ``internal" degree of freedom of the system. (A further time differentiation of Eq.(\ref{eq:meq2}) renders it in the familiar form relating strain rate to the stress and its rate of change.) According to \cite{zocchi3}, the mechanism that drives the transition is an underlying energy versus displacement curve that changes from quadratic---i.e., harmonic---at low displacement, to linear at higher displacements. The precise nature of this form of potential energy curve is not expanded on in that reference.
Inspired by the above results, we have explored the dynamical response of a somewhat different---but unified---depiction of the driven protein system. Our approach is based on a Kelvin-Voigt model for a viscoelastic substance, as shown in Fig. \ref{fig:models}. The spring in this system is not, however, strictly Hookean. Rather the energy of the spring as a function of displacement, $V(x)$, which gives rise to a restoring force $F(x)$, is schematically displayed in Fig. \ref{fig:enforce}. In our initial analysis, we ignore inertial effects, under the assumption that the system is heavily over-damped. We find that the system displays an unexpectedly rich range of behavior, including symmetry breaking---and restoration---dynamical phase transitions, as well as noise driven rounding and ``switching" in bi-stability and many features reminiscent of equilibrium thermodynamic phase transitions, such as
spinodals and multicriticality. Preliminary investigations of the effects of inertia on the dynamical equations reveal an even richer range.
There is at least one precedent for a dynamical transition in a driven system of the type that is explored here. The Suzuki-Kubo equation describes the behavior of a mean field version of the Ising model with dissipative dynamics in which the spin variables are driven by a magnetic field with sinusoidal time dependence \cite{sk}. At low temperatures, the response to the driving field undergoes a dynamical transition, from an oscillation about an equilibrium ferromagnetic state at small amplitude of the drive to an oscillation at larger drive amplitudes centered about spin magnitude equal to zero \cite{TandO}. This dynamical transition can be either continuous or first order, depending on the temperature. However, the physics underlying that model differs fundamentally from the phenomena explored here.
The remainder of this paper is organized as follows. In Sec. \ref{sec:model} the basic model is introduced and the deterministic, noise free, dynamical phase diagram is displayed summarizing the basic behavior. In Sec. \ref{sec:analytical}, to provide additional insight, we provide some analytical results for the model with a piecewise continuous restoring force. In the following section, Sec. \ref{sec:compliances}, we make contact with typical dynamical responses, as measured in experiments on viscoelastic materials in general and in the experiments of Zocchi et al. in particular. For the basic over-damped deterministic case we discuss the nature of the transitions and compare the analysis to that of standard mean field theory for thermodynamic phase transitions in Sec. \ref{sec:transnature}. Section \ref{sec:inertia} contains a preliminary investigation into the effects of inertia, while the effect of noise on the transitions and response functions is discussed in Sec. \ref{sec:noise} via Langevin over-damped dynamics and a master equation. Concluding remarks follow, including a short discussion of the consequences of a restoring force without the symmetry shown in Fig. \ref{fig:enforce}. Appendices contain some details on our ``standard model,'' a comparison to mean field thermodynamics and a brief commentary on an alternate version of the restoring force.
\section{Model, dynamical phase diagram, and characterization of response} \label{sec:model}
Our model is a highly simplified depiction of a folded protein, in which we single out a collective degree of freedom that we assume dominates the response of the molecule to an external force. As a caricature of its much more complex structure, we assume a system described by the Kelvin-Voigt model of viscoelasticty \cite{Lakes,Findley}, as shown in Fig. \ref{fig:models}, which, as we will see, appears natural for a driven, over-damped, nonlinear oscillator. The spring in this model can be thought of as a gross simplification of the Tirion model for protein interactions \cite{tirion}, with the caveat that our coordinate, $x$, is a collective one, while the Tirion model replaces the various interactions between the actual constituents of a protein by harmonic
bonds between idealized point-like entities. In addition, we assume the possibility of the ``cracking'' of this protein under sufficient external stress \cite{Ansari,proteinquakes,[{See also Anderson \textit{et. al.}: Chapter 8 of }] Noy} through the reversible detachment of the spring. This means that the harmonic potential energy expression
holds only in a limited range of values of $x$. According to the model we adopt, at sufficiently large values of $|x|$ the potential energy and associated restoring force depart from strict Hookean form
to approach either a constant energy (and, correspondingly, no restoring force) or a fixed, constant restoring force corresponding to a linear, rather than quadratic, energy. Figure \ref{fig:enforce} is a schematic depiction of a particular version of such a force and associated energy function. Inside a region centered at the origin, $x=0$, the potential is nearly harmonic and the force is approximately Hookean. Outside this central region the force approaches constant values $\pm F_0$, and the associated confining potential is linear. The precise form of the restoring force utilized in our calculations is described in Appendix \ref{app:restore}.
\begin{figure}[htbp]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=3in]{enforce.pdf}
\caption{The potential energy, $V(x)$, (red, dashed) and associated restoring force, $F(x)$, (blue, solid) that we assume in our model. The force approaches $\pm F_0$ for large $x$, as indicated in the figure.}
\label{fig:enforce}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
We assume initially that the motion of our system is highly over-damped, so that the time rate of change of the displacement coordinate $x$ is directly proportional to the force generating change in the system. Given the restoring force shown in Fig. \ref{fig:enforce} and a periodic external force, the equation of motion takes the form
\begin{equation}
\frac{dx(t)}{dt} = \frac{1}{\gamma} \left[ F(x(t)) + A \sin( \omega t)\right] \label{eq:eom1}
\end{equation}
where the parameter $\gamma$ encodes viscous effects.
Figure \ref{fig:phasediagrampic2} indicates the resulting behavior when the drive amplitude, $A$, and $F_0$, the asymptotic absolute strength of the confining force, are scanned.
\begin{figure}[htbp]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=3in]{phasediagrampic4.pdf}
\caption{Dynamical phase diagram of the types of response to a sinusoidal drive exhibited by
the equation of motion (\ref{eq:eom1}) with restoring force $F(x)$ as shown in Fig. \ref{fig:enforce}. The horizontal axis is the absolute value of the asymptotes of the restoring force at large $|x|$. The vertical axis is the inverse of the drive amplitude, $A$. The parameter $\alpha$ controlling the transition from Hooke's law to constant restoring force (see Eqs. (\ref{eq:restore1})--(\ref{eq:restore6}) and Fig. \ref{fig:3Forces}) has been set equal to 0.01. The frequency of the drive, $\omega$, is equal to 1/2, and the viscosity parameter, $\gamma$, is set equal to one. }
\label{fig:phasediagrampic2}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
In Regions 1 and 1a, color-coded blue, the steady state periodic solution, is symmetric about the origin. In Region 2, color-coded red, the dynamically stable solution is skewed, either to the right or the left of the origin. As it turns out, skewed solutions appear in pairs; see Appendix \ref{app:pairs}. There is also a symmetric steady state solution that is, however, dynamically unstable. In Region 3, color-coded green, three dynamically stable, steady state solutions exist, one symmetric and the other two skewed. In addition, there are two skewed, \textit{dynamically unstable}, steady state solutions. Finally, a region complementing Region 3, separating Region 1 from Region 2, is not shown as it is exceedingly narrow and beyond the resolution in Fig. \ref{fig:phasediagrampic2}.
Figures \ref{fig:1and1a}--\ref{fig:3} illustrate the (steady state) solutions characteristic of the four regions in Fig. \ref{fig:phasediagrampic2}. The time interval shown corresponds to two periods of the driving force. The parameters $A$ and $F_0$ corresponding to the region of the phase diagram are provided in the captions, while $k=2$, corresponding to the spring constant in the harmonic regime, and $\omega=0.5$ for the driving force are kept constant in these figures. The friction constant $\gamma = 1$ sets the time scale.
\begin{figure}[htbp]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=3in]{1and1a.pdf}
\caption{The steady state response in Region 1 (solid curve) and in Region 1a (dashed curve). Both are dynamically stable. The inverse of the drive amplitude, $1/A$, is 0.53 for the Region 1 response and 0.51 for the Region 1a response. The asymptotes of the restoring force outside the harmonic regime are $\pm F_0$ with $F_0=0.6$, and the value of the spring constant in the Hooke's law region is $k=2$. The frequency of the driving force is $\omega =0.5$. The transition between a harmonic restoring force and a force equal to $\pm F_0$ occurs at $|x| \simeq 1$. The restoring force is given in Appendix \ref{app:restore} with parameter $\alpha =0.01$. }
\label{fig:1and1a}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure}[htbp]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=3in]{2.pdf}
\caption{The three steady state responses in Region 2. The solid, skewed, curves are dynamically stable and the dashed, symmetric, curve is dynamically unstable. The quantity $F_0$ is 0.1 and $1/A=0.45$. All other parameters are the same as in Fig. \ref{fig:1and1a}. }
\label{fig:2}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure}[htbp]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=3in]{3.pdf}
\caption{The five steady state responses in Region 3. The solid symmetric curve and the two solid skewed curves are dynamically stable, while the two skewed curves shown dashed are dynamically unstable. The quantity $F_0$ is 0.1, and the inverse of the drive amplitude, $1/A$, is 0.35. All other parameters are the same as in Figs. \ref{fig:1and1a} and \ref{fig:2}.}
\label{fig:3}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
Given the very different properties of the steady states in the four regions, the boundaries between the regions are necessarily sharp. We will return to the nature of the transitions that take place as those boundaries are traversed.
For the time being, it is worthwhile to consider the two solutions for $x(t)$ shown in Fig. \ref{fig:1and1a}. They differ in a few respects. First, although the driving force strengths differ by less than 5\%, the displacement amplitudes are quite different. Second, the curve describing the solution in Region 1 is nearly sinusoidal (in fact, nearly in phase with the drive, which goes as $\sin (\omega t)$, while the steady state solution for Region 1a is somewhat distorted. Furthermore, the latter solution is well out of phase with respect to the drive. As we will see, the steady state solution in Region 1 is close to elastic---i.e., nondissipative---while the the behavior in Region 1a is strongly dissipative.
\section{Analytical solution in a limiting case} \label{sec:analytical}
To gain a perspective on the nature of solutions of Eq. (\ref{eq:eom1}), we consider
the limiting assumption of a sharp break between the regime in which the restoring force is strictly linear and the range of the displacement variable $x$ in which it is considerably gentler. If the restoring force outside the harmonic regime \textit{ vanishes}, the function $F(x)$ has the form
\begin{equation}
F(x) = \left\{ \begin{array}{ll} -kx & |x| <x_0 \\ 0 & |x| \ge x_0 \end{array} \right. \label{eq:forcelim1}
\end{equation}
The solutions to
Eq. (\ref{eq:eom1}) in the two regimes are
\begin{eqnarray}
x_i(t) &=& Be^{-kt/\gamma} \nonumber \\ && - \frac{A}{\sqrt{\gamma^2 \omega^2 +k^2}} \cos \left( \omega t + \arctan \frac{k}{ \gamma \omega} \right) \label{eq:inside} \\ x_e(t) & = & B^{\prime} -\frac{A}{\gamma \omega} \cos ( \omega t) \, ,\label{eq:outside}
\end{eqnarray}
where the subscripts $i$ and $e$ refer to behavior in the ``interior'' region $|x|<x_0$ and the ``exterior'' region $|x| \ge x_0$. A complete solution to the equation of motion requires adjusting the coefficients $B$ and $B^{\prime}$ so as to match $x_i(t)$ and $x_e(t)$ at the boundary between the two regimes.
When the frequency of the driving force is small, the characters of the ``exterior'' and ``interior'' responses differ fundamentally. In the exterior region, the steady state velocity, $v_e(t) = dx_e(t)/dt$, is in phase with the driving force, which means that the drive's energy feeds optimally into viscous damping. On the other hand, when $\gamma \omega \ll k$, $dx_i(t)/dt$ is almost ninety degrees out of phase with the driving force, so the response is nearly the same as at static equilibrium, in that the two terms in square brackets in (\ref{eq:eom1}) nearly cancel, and the dissipation is quite small. In the regime of low frequency response, we can roughly characterize the dynamics in the exterior region as \textit{viscous} and the behavior in the interior region as \textit{elastic}. It is therefore reasonable to expect that as the driving amplitude, $A$, increases, the response will evolve from elastic to viscous.
However, as strongly indicated by the phase diagram shown above, the change from elastic to viscous response entails an abrupt transition in the dynamical behavior. This transition occurs near the drive amplitude for which the coordinate $x$ visits the region outside the harmonic regime (in fact, it occurs at a slightly lower drive amplitude). At this point skewed solutions to the equation of motion appear and, in fact, coexist with solutions remaining entirely within the harmonic regime.
Figure \ref{fig:coex1} shows two full periods of two skewed solution to the equation of motion (\ref{eq:eom1}) with confining potential (\ref{eq:forcelim1}).
\begin{figure}[htbp]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=3in]{coex1.pdf}
\caption{Two skewed solutions to Eqs. (\ref{eq:eom1}) and (\ref{eq:forcelim1}). The value of $x_0 $ has been set equal to one. }
\label{fig:coex1}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
The displacement limits outside of which which the restoring force vanishes are indicated by dashed lines. Note the slope discontinuities when those limits are traversed. This is permissible in a system in which inertia is ignored. The trajectories consist of the two solutions (\ref{eq:inside}) and (\ref{eq:outside}), grafted together at the boundaries between their regimes of applicability. From the nature of the solution for $|x(t)| > x_0$, we see that, in the case of the solution skewed above the $x$ axis, the intervals in which the solution for $|x(t)| < x_0$ applies, as depicted in Fig. \ref{fig:coex1}, will satisfy
\begin{equation}
(2n+1) \pi / \omega + t_0 < t < (2n+3) \pi/ \omega -t_0 \, ,\label{eq:window}
\end{equation}
corresponding to time windows lying symmetrically within the interval between successive odd multiples of the period of the forcing term, $2 \pi/ \omega$. We can write for the form of a solution in such a time window
\begin{eqnarray}
\lefteqn{x(t)} \nonumber \\ &=& -\frac{A}{\omega \sqrt{1+(k/\omega)^2}} \cos (\omega t+ \arctan(k/ \omega)) \nonumber \\ && + Ce^{-k\left( t -(2n+1) \pi/\omega - t_0 \right)} \label{eq:v6}
\end{eqnarray}
Here and henceforth, we have set the parameters $\gamma =1, x_0 = 1$. In order for the solution in (\ref{eq:v6}) to properly match the solution for $|x(t)|> x_0$ at the limits of the window, we require
\begin{eqnarray}
x_0 & = & -\frac{A}{\omega \sqrt{1+(k/ \omega)^2}} \cos ( (2n+1) \pi + \omega t_0 \nonumber \\ && + \arctan(k/ \omega)) + C \label{eq:v7} \\
x_0 & = & -\frac{A}{\omega \sqrt{1+(k/ \omega)^2}} \cos((2n+3) \pi - \omega t_0 \nonumber \\ && + \arctan(k/\omega)) + Ce^{-2 \pi k/ \omega + 2kt_0} \label{eq:v8}
\end{eqnarray}
We can eliminate the constant $C$ between these two equations, and we are left with the equation for $t_0$
\begin{eqnarray}
\lefteqn{\frac{A}{\omega \sqrt{1+(k/ \omega)^2}} \bigg[ \cos(- \omega t_0 + \arctan (k/ \omega))} \nonumber \\ && - e^{- 2 \pi k/ \omega + 2kt_0} \cos( \omega t_0 + \arctan(k/ \omega)) \bigg] \nonumber \\ && +x_0\left( e^{- 2 \pi k/ \omega +2 k t_0} -1 \right) =0 \label{eq:v9}
\end{eqnarray}
The left hand side of (\ref{eq:v9}) as function of $t_0$ is displayed in Fig. \ref{fig:t0plot}, with the variables $x_0$, $k$ and $\omega$ set so as to correspond to their values in the phase diagram in Fig. \ref{fig:phasediagrampic2}.
\begin{figure}[htbp]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=3in]{transitioncurves.pdf}
\caption{The left hand side of (\ref{eq:v9}) as a function of $t_0$, with $x_0=1$, $k=2$ and $\omega=0.5$. The three curves correspond to the following three values of the drive amplitude: $A=1$ (blue long-dashed curve), $A=2$ (red dashed curve), $A=3$ (black solid curve). }
\label{fig:t0plot}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
As shown in the figure, smaller amplitudes correspond to lower curves.
Note that there is always a solution
$\omega t_0 = \pi $, which says that the window in (\ref{eq:window}) has shrunk to zero. This is reasonable since it is always possible, by setting initial conditions appropriately, to construct a solution in which $x(t)$ lies completely in the regime of vanishing restoring force. When $t_0 = \pi/ \omega$ is the \textit{only} solution to (\ref{eq:v9}), then solutions to the equations of motion (\ref{eq:eom1}) with $F(x)$ given by (\ref{eq:forcelim1}) either lie completely in the regime $|x| < x_0 $ (where, in this example, $x_0=1$) or entirely outside of it. At a threshold value of the amplitude, two more apparent solutions arise, as for the solid curve in Fig. \ref{fig:t0plot}.
The next step is to determine whether the new intersections correspond to solutions of the equation of motion, and, if so, whether those solutions are dynamically stable. As it turns out, one of the two new solutions of (\ref{eq:v9})---the solution corresponding to the larger value of $t_0 $---does indeed correspond to a legitimate response. Furthermore, the response is dynamically stable. Appendix \ref{app:stability} describes the analysis.
Another interesting aspect of the dynamical behavior is the existence of an exceedingly small range of amplitudes, $A$, in which a dynamically stable, skewed solution coexists with a symmetric solution lying entirely inside the Hooke's law region. As an example of coexistence Figure \ref{fig:transtest1}
\begin{figure}[htbp]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=3in]{transtest1a.pdf}
\caption{The left hand side of Eq. (\ref{eq:v9}) when $k=2$, $\omega=0.5$, $\gamma =1$, $x_0=1$ and the drive amplitude $A$ is equal to $\sqrt{k^2+ \omega^2}$. The lower portion of the figure shows the expression for the entire range of $t_0$, from 0 to $\pi/\omega$. The upper portion magnifies the portion of the graph in which the left hand side of (\ref{eq:v9}) passes through zero.}
\label{fig:transtest1}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
shows the left hand side of Eq. (\ref{eq:v9}) when the parameters are adjusted so that there is a solution to the equation of motion that just fits in the region $-x_0 < x < x_0$. Even though there is such a trajectory, an additional skewed and dynamically stable solution to the equation of motion (\ref{eq:eom1}) with $F(x)$ given by (\ref{eq:forcelim1}) also exists (actually a pair, see below), corresponding to the solution to (\ref{eq:v9}) in which $t_0 \approx 2.654$. The region of coexistence is spanned as the drive amplitude $A$ changes by about one part in $10^6$. Figure \ref{fig:coexistence4} shows the three stable solutions.
\begin{figure}[htbp]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=3in]{coexistence4.pdf}
\caption{The three stable solutions to the equation of motion (\ref{eq:eom1}) with restoring force given by (\ref{eq:forcelim1}). The parameters are the same as in Fig. \ref{fig:transtest1}. The two skewed solutions are shown as solid curves and the dots indicate the symmetric solution, which just fits in the Hooke's Law region for the restoring force. The boundaries of that region are shown as dashed lines. }
\label{fig:coexistence4}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
Not shown in the figure are the two unstable skewed solutions to the equation of motion that lie between the symmetric solution and the stable skewed solutions.
Given a solution, $x(t)$ of the equation of motion (\ref{eq:eom1}) with the kind of restoring force considered here, i.e. a restoring force with the property $F(-x) = -F(x)$, it is straightforward to show that the equation of motion is also satisfied by $-x(t + \pi/\omega)$. From this we can infer from one skewed solution another one, skewed in the opposite direction. This feature was used to construct the pair of skewed solutions in Fig.\ref{fig:coexistence4}. Thus, we have confirmed the existence of two distinct stable, skewed solutions to the equation of motion for sufficiently high values of the driving amplitude. See Appendix \ref{app:pairs}.
\section{Loss and storage compliances} \label{sec:compliances}
To further quantify the transition, we introduce a generalization of the way in which the response of a linear viscoelastic system is characterized in terms of dissipative, or loss, compliances and storage, or elastic, compliances. Given the notation we utilize here, the stress exerted on the system is $ A \sin (\omega t)$. The response of the system, if linear, would be of the form
\begin{eqnarray}
x(t) &=& x_{\rm diss}(t) + x_{\rm el}(t) \nonumber \\
& = & -X_d \cos( \omega t) + X_e \sin( \omega t) \nonumber \\
& = & -j_2 A \cos( \omega t) + j_1 A \sin(\omega t) \, ,\label{eq:ds1}
\end{eqnarray}
where $j_1$ is the \textit{ storage compliance} and $j_2$ is the \textit{ loss compliance} \cite{Findley}, and the subscripts on the first line of (\ref{eq:ds1}) stand for ``dissipative'' and ``elastic.''
In the case of nonlinear response, it is possible to generalize the above decomposition by extracting the contribution to the response that gives rise to dissipation. We do this by taking the integral of the steady state solution over a period,
\begin{equation}
Y_{d }= \frac{\omega}{\pi}\int_0^{2 \pi/\omega} x(t) \cos(\omega t) d t \, ,\label{eq:ds2}
\end{equation}
in which case we can write
\begin{eqnarray}
x(t) &=& Y_d \cos(\omega t) + (x(t) - Y_d \cos(\omega t) ) \nonumber \\
& \equiv & x_{\rm diss}(t) + x_{\rm el}(t) \label{eq:ds3}
\end{eqnarray}
The entirety of the dissipative response is contained in $x_{\rm diss}(t)$ as defined above, in that
\begin{equation}
\int_0^{2 \pi/ \omega} \sin(\omega t) \frac{dx_{\rm el}(t)}{dt} dt =0 \label{eq:ds4}
\end{equation}
This means that the quantity $-Y_d/\sqrt{2}A$ (see below) plays the role of the dissipative compliance, while there is not necessarily any quantity that can be unambiguously associated with the storage compliance.
We now return to our "standard model" shown schematically in Fig. \ref{fig:enforce}. Figure \ref{fig:belowandabove} displays the two solutions for $x(t)$ shown in Fig. \ref{fig:1and1a}, divided into dissipative and elastic components. As is clear from the lower plot in the figure, which refers to the response in Region 1a, the elastic response is not simply proportional to the driving force, $A \sin(\omega t)$.
\begin{figure}[htbp]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=3in]{belowandabove.pdf}
\caption{The two solutions for $x(t)$ shown in Fig. \ref{fig:1and1a}, broken into dissipative contributions (solid curves) and storage contributions (dashed curves); see Eq. (\ref{eq:ds3}). The top plot shows the solution in Region 1, in which the response is dominantly elastic and the bottom plot shows the solution in Region 1a in which the response is more dissipative. Recall that the inverse of the drive amplitude is 0.53 in the case of the top plot and 0.51 for the bottom plot,
and $F_0 = 0.6$.}
\label{fig:belowandabove}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
However, based on the developments above, we can reduce the elastic and dissipative components of the response to two numbers. If
\begin{equation}
I_t^2 = \frac{\omega}{2 \pi}\int_0^{2 \pi/\omega} x(t)^2 dt \, ,\label{eq:ds5}
\end{equation}
then
\begin{eqnarray}
\frac{\omega}{2 \pi} \int_0^{2 \pi/ \omega} x_{\rm diss}(t)^2 dt &=& \frac{Y_d^2}{2} \nonumber \\ & \equiv & I_d^2 \label{eq:ds6} \\
\frac{\omega}{2 \pi} \int_0^{2 \pi/ \omega} x_{\rm el}(t)^2 dt & = & I_t^2 -I_d^2 \nonumber \\ & \equiv & I_s^2 \, ,\label{eq:ds7}
\end{eqnarray}
which means we can define an overall compliance as $I_t/A$, with a storage compliance, $j_1 = I_s/A$, and a loss compliance, $j_2 = I_d/A$.
As a final technicality, we need to address the case in which there are dynamically stable skewed solutions to the equation of motion. The measurements that motivated this study are made on a collection of driven oscillators; furthermore, thermal noise is substantial. As we will see such a system will equilibriate into an ensemble in which the two skewed responses, when they exist, are equally represented. This means that under such conditions, we should replace $x(t)$ in the equations defining the compliance by
\begin{equation}
\langle x(t) \rangle = (x(t) - x(t + \pi/ \omega))/2
\label{eq:skave}
\end{equation}
Figure \ref{fig:responsecomposition2} displays an example of the case in which the response curve is skewed and the average in (\ref{eq:skave}) has been performed The full response is shown as well as the two components that comprise it.
\begin{figure}[htbp]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=3in]{responsecomposition3.pdf}
\caption{The average of the two stable skewed response curves. The solid black curve is the full response. The long dashed blue curve is the dissipative contribution, going as $\cos( \omega t)$, which we term $x_{\rm diss}(t)$. The dashed red curve is what remains when the dissipative component is subtracted from the full response. We term that response $x_{\rm el}(t)$ (See (\ref{eq:ds3}). Here, $k=2$, $\omega =0.5$, $F_0 =0$, $\alpha =0.01$ and $A$, the drive amplitude, is equal to 1.9. }
\label{fig:responsecomposition2}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
\section{On the nature of the dynamical phase transition} \label{sec:transnature}
Our focus has been the steady state behavior of the dynamical system described by (\ref{eq:eom1})
When the crossover from a restoring force described by Hooke's Law to a constant restoring force $F_0$ is not abrupt, the methods of Sec. \ref{sec:analytical} cannot be applied. An alternate approach that proves powerful, useful and universal, utilizes a standard map or recursion relation. This relation follows from the fact that the solution of a first order differential equation like (\ref{eq:eom1}) is determined entirely by a single initial condition. That is, if we know $x(0)$, then we can use the equation to forward integrate and determine $x(t)$ at all subsequent times. In particular, we can create a map that takes us from $x(0)$ to $x(2 \pi/\omega)$, the value of the dynamical variable one period later. A steady state solution to the equation of motion will have the property $x(2 \pi/\omega)= x(0)$---if we can discount the possibility of solutions with a period at a subharmonic of the driving force. Figure \ref{fig:recur1} displays such a recursion graph, calculated from Eq. (\ref{eq:eom1}) with a particular choice of parameter values.
\begin{figure}[htbp]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=3in]{recur1p.pdf}
\caption{Example of the map connecting $x(0)$ with $x(2 \pi/\omega)$, the quantity $x(t)$ satisfying Eq. (\ref{eq:eom1}). Also shown is the line $x( 2 \pi/\omega) = x(0)$. In this case, the drive amplitude, $A$ is 2.75, the frequency, $\omega$, of the drive is 2, $k$ is 2, the parameter $\alpha$ is 0.15 and the asymptotic force, $F_0$, is equal to zero. As always, $x_0=1$ and $\gamma =1$. The small open circles denote the intersections between the map and the $45^{\circ}$ line corresponding to steady state solutions of the equation of motion. }
\label{fig:recur1}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
Also shown in that figure is the $45^{\circ}$ line corresponding to $x(2 \pi/\omega) = x(0)$. The small open circles indicate intersection of that line with the recursion curve, corresponding to steady state solutions of the equation.
We can assess the dynamical stability of the steady state solutions in the standard fashion by iterating the recursion relation \cite{GandH,Feigenbaum}. The graphical version of this process is displayed in Fig. \ref{fig:stability1}, in which we focus our attention on the section of the curve containing the intersections.
\begin{figure}[htbp]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=2.5in]{stability1p.pdf}
\caption{The result of graphical iterations of the recursion relation embodied in the curve displayed in Fig. \ref{fig:recur1}. The broken curves impinge on the recursion curve vertically and on the $45^{\circ}$ line horizontally. }
\label{fig:stability1}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
The stepwise curves between the map and the $45^{\circ}$ line are graphical renditions of the result of iteration of the recursion relation. As indicated by the arrowheads on those curves, repeated calculations of the quantity $x(t)$ at succeeding intervals of one period tend away from the central intersection and towards one of the flanking ones. We are led to the conclusion that the central solution for a steady state is dynamically unstable, while the two solutions that flank it are, by contrast, dynamically stable. Such a recursion relation yields the solutions one finds in Region 2 of the dynamical phase diagram as shown in Fig. \ref{fig:phasediagrampic2}.
Given a steady state solution for a particular $x(0)$, we can then compute $x(t)$ for the entire interval between $t=0$ and $t= 2 \pi/\omega$, and from this the response properties of that solution. As an example, we can explore in more detail the transitions between the various regions shown in the phase diagram in Fig. \ref{fig:phasediagrampic2}. We start by looking at the portion of the phase diagram that is exactly on the vertical axis, i.e. for which the large-$x$ asymptote of the restoring force is $F_0 = 0$. Making use of the definitions in Sec. \ref{sec:compliances} for total, storage and loss compliances, we obtain results for the quantities $I_t/A$, $I_s/A$ and $I_d/A$. Figure \ref{fig:phaset1} shows the total compliance, $I_t/A$, plotted in terms of the amplitude, $A$, of the drive.
\begin{figure}[htbp]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=3in]{phaset1p.pdf}
\caption{The total compliance, $I_t/A$, plotted agains the drive amplitude, $A$. Here, $F_0$=0, $\omega=0.5$, $k=2$ and the parameter $\alpha = 0.01$. Here and in Fig. \ref{fig:phaset2} the compliances are as defined in Sec. \ref{sec:compliances}. }
\label{fig:phaset1}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
Note the discontinuity in the compliance, which can be taken as evidence for a first order transition. Figure \ref{fig:phaset2} shows the two contributions to the total compliance, obtained from $I_d/A$, and $I_s/A$.
\begin{figure}[htbp]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=3in]{phaset2p.pdf}
\caption{The two contributions to the total compliance graphed in Fig. \ref{fig:phaset1}: the dissipative compliance $I_d/A$ (long dashed blue curve), the storage compliance $I_s/A$ (dashed red curve) and the total compliance, (thin black curve).}
\label{fig:phaset2}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
Close investigation reveals a very narrow regime around the point of discontinuity in which there is coexistence between the responses corresponding to the compliances to the right and left of the transition point in Figs. \ref{fig:phaset1} and \ref{fig:phaset2}. The regime is sufficiently thin that it is undetectable given the resolution of the figure.
The discontinuities in the dynamic response graphed in Figs. \ref{fig:phaset1} and \ref{fig:phaset2} imply a dynamical transition with the characteristics of a first order thermodynamic phase transition, in that there are discontinuities in key quantities. However, a transition with discontinuities is not inevitable. If the change in the restoring force from harmonic to a constant (in the example being discussed: $F_0=0$) is sufficiently gentle, then the dynamical transformation becomes\textit{ continuous} in the thermodynamic sense. That is, it remains sharp, but physical properties, such as dynamical moduli, no longer exhibit discontinuities in their dependence on the drive amplitude.
The change in the character of the transition as the properties of the restoring force are altered is illustrated in Figs \ref{fig:fograph} and \ref{fig:criticalgraph}, which display plots highlighting the intersections of recursion curves with the $45^{\circ}$ line. In particular, the figures show how the points of intersection change with drive amplitude. The plot in Fig. \ref{fig:fograph} contains four recursion curves, corresponding to four different drive amplitudes. In this case there is a first order dynamical phase transition. The parameters are---with the exception of $\omega$---the same as in the phase diagram in Fig. \ref{fig:phasediagrampic2} with $F_0=0$. The drive frequency has been set as $\omega = 2$ in order to make certain features of the curve more visible and to expand the coexistence region between Regions 1 and 2. The longer dashed blue curve intersects the $45^{\circ}$ line once, corresponding to a single symmetric and stable dynamical steady state. This curve is characteristic of low drive amplitude and (more nearly) elastic response. The (short-) dashed red curve corresponds to the drive amplitude at which one sees the onset of four more steady state solutions to the equation of motion, all of them skewed, two stable and two unstable. In the regime represented by the solid black curve, those additional solutions are clearly visible, and three dynamically stable steady state solutions to the equation of motion coexist -- one symmetric and two skewed. The long-dashed red curve corresponds to the high amplitude regime, Region 2 in the phase diagram, in which there are two stable skewed steady state solutions and one unstable symmetric solution to the equation of motion. The restoring force is as given in Appendix \ref{app:restore}, with parameter $\alpha =0.01$, the same value as was used to generate the phase diagram in Fig. \ref{fig:phasediagrampic2}.
\begin{figure}[htbp]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=3in]{nfograph.pdf}
\caption{Illustrating a first order transition between Region 1 and Region 2. Referring to Appendix \ref{app:restore}, the parameters in the restoring force and the equation of motion are as follows: $\omega=2$, $k=2$, $x_0=1$, $\alpha=0.01$ and $F_0=0$. The longer dashed blue curve and the shorter dashed red curve correspond to Region 1 in the phase diagram in Fig. \ref{fig:phasediagrampic2}. The longest dashed red curve corresponds to Region 2, and the solid black curve to a coexistence region between Regions 1 and 2. Such a region exists but is exceedingly narrow for the set of variables used to generate Fig. \ref{fig:phasediagrampic2}. }
\label{fig:fograph}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
Figure \ref{fig:criticalgraph} displays the effect of smoothing out the transition region in $F(x)$. Here, the parameter $\alpha$ has been set equal to 0.15. In this case, the transition from a single, stable and symmetric, steady state solution to three steady state solutions---two skewed and stable and one symmetric and unstable---occurs continuously with no coexistence region and no discontinuities in dynamical response. The drive frequency, $\omega$, has again been set equal to 2, while the spring constant $k$ in the Hooke's Law region is maintained at 2. The short-dashed blue curve corresponds to Region 1, the long-dashed red curve is characteristic of Region 2, and the solid black curve illustrates the onset of the transition between one symmetric, stable solution to the equation of motion and three solutions, two skewed and stable, one symmetric and unstable. No region of coexistence separates the two.
\begin{figure}[htbp]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=3in]{ncriticalgraph.pdf}
\caption{Illustrating a continuous transition between Regions 1 and 2 in Fig. \ref{fig:phasediagrampic2} when $\alpha$ is increased from 0.01 to 0.15 so as to stretch out the transition region between a Hooke's Law restoring force and a vanishing restoring force, i.e. $F_0=0$. Otherwise the parameters utilized are the same as in Fig. \ref{fig:criticalgraph}. See Appendix A. The dashed blue curve corresponds to Region 1 and the long dashed red curve to Region 2. The solid black curve corresponds to the onset of the transition between the two regions. }
\label{fig:criticalgraph}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
Figure \ref{fig:continuous} illustrates the compliances associated with Fig \ref{fig:criticalgraph}, quantified in terms of those defined in Sec. \ref{sec:compliances}.
\begin{figure}[htbp]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=3in]{continuousp.pdf}
\caption{In the case of parameter values leading to the plot in Fig. \ref{fig:criticalgraph}, the total compliance, $I_t/A$, (solid black curve) and the three contributions to that compliance: the dissipative compliance $I_d/A$ (long dashed blue curve) and the storage compliance $I_s/A$ (dashed red curve). Here, the transition is continuous. Also shown on the graph is the value of the amplitude, $A$ at which the transition between Section 1 and Section 2 in the phase diagram occurs. For definitions of the compliances see Sec. \ref{sec:compliances}.}
\label{fig:continuous}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
Because of the particular relative values of $\omega$ and $k$, the compliance in Region 1 of the phase diagram divides equally into viscous and elastic, while in Region 2 viscous response increasingly dominates.
The compliance curves are continuous and without evident features marking the transition from Region 1 to Region 2. Very close inspection reveals singularities in the form of mild slope discontinuities in $I_t/A$, $I_s/A$ and $I_d/A$, which are unlikely to be detectable in any experimental realization of this system. Figure \ref{fig:detail} shows the total compliance, $I_t/A$, in the immediate vicinity of the transition.
\begin{figure}[htbp]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=3in]{detailp.pdf}
\caption{The total compliance, $I_t/A$, in the immediate vicinity of the continuous transition from Region 1 to Region 3 in the dynamical phase diagram. }
\label{fig:detail}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
The recursion curves bear a close relationship to the free energy extremum curves that arise in a simple order parameter-based model of a tricritical system. To be specific, the intersection of the recursion curves with the $45^{\circ}$ line correspond with the intersection of the curves for $d \mathcal{F}(\psi)/d \psi$ with the abscissa, as shown in Figs. \ref{fig:tc1a} and \ref{fig:tc2a} in Appendix \ref{app:tricrit}, which reviews the classical order parameter based model of a tricritical point.
\section{On the effects of inertia} \label{sec:inertia}
So far we have ignored any effects of inertia on the response of the system. In light of the unexpected nature of the over-damped response and the typically significant effects of inertia,
including resonant behavior, it is worthwhile to ask whether the dynamical transitions observed in the absence of inertia survive its introduction into the equations of motion. To this end, we have performed preliminary studies of an extension of (\ref{eq:eom1}) that incorporates an inertial term. The new equation of motion is
\begin{equation}
m \frac{d^2x(t)}{dt^2} + \gamma \frac{dx(t)}{dt} =F(x(t)) + A \sin(\omega t)\, , \label{eq:in1}
\end{equation}
which can be rewritten as
\begin{eqnarray}
\frac{dx(t)}{dt} & = & \frac{p(t)}{m} \label{eq:in2} \\
\frac{dp(t)}{dt} & = & - \gamma x(t) +F(x(t)) + A \sin( \omega t) \label{eq:in3}
\end{eqnarray}
The search for steady state solutions to the above equation of motion can be formulated in terms of a pair of recursion relations. That is, on the basis of Eqs. (\ref{eq:in2}) and (\ref{eq:in3}) we can construct a map from $x_0 = x(0)$ and $p_0=p(0)$ to $x_1=x( 2 \pi/\omega)$ and $p_1=p( 2 \pi/\omega)$. The map takes the form
\begin{eqnarray}
x_1 & = & X(x_0,p_0) \label{eq:in4} \\
p_1 & = & P(x_0,p_0) \label{eq:in5}
\end{eqnarray}
Steady state solutions to the equation of motion are $x_f$ and $p_f$, where
\begin{eqnarray}
x_f & = & X(x_f,p_f) \label{eq:in6} \\
p_f & = & P(x_f,p_f) \label{eq:in7}
\end{eqnarray}
Taken separately each of the relations above generates a curve in the ($x_f$, $p_f$) plane. Figure \ref{fig:infig1} displays two such curves.
\begin{figure}[htbp]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=3in]{infig1p.pdf}
\caption{A curve corresponding to (\ref{eq:in6}) (solid curve) and (\ref{eq:in7}) (dashed curve). In this case, we have taken $k=2$, $\gamma=1$, $\alpha=0.01$ in the expression for the restoring force (see Appendix \ref{app:restore}) and the force outside the Hookean region, $F_0=0$. The effective mass is $m =1$, and the drive amplitude, $A=1.82$.}
\label{fig:infig1}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
The point at which the two curves intersect corresponds to a simultaneous solution of (\ref{eq:in6}) and (\ref{eq:in7}) and thus a steady state solution of (\ref{eq:in2}) and (\ref{eq:in3}). The solution $x(t)$ arising from that intersection, which corresponds to a relatively weak driving force, is displayed in Fig. \ref{fig:infig2}.
\begin{figure}[htbp]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=3in]{infig2p.pdf}
\caption{The solutions, $x(t)$, corresponding to the point of intersection in Fig. \ref{fig:infig1}. The response is entirely inside the regime in which the restoring force is Hookean. }
\label{fig:infig2}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
Also shown in that figure are the nominal limits of the harmonic restoring force, at $x=\pm1$.
By contrast, when the amplitude of the drive increases, more than one solution to the fixed point equations (\ref{eq:in6}) and (\ref{eq:in7}) appear, as shown in Fig. \ref{fig:infig1pp}.
\begin{figure}[htbp]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=3in]{infig3.pdf}
\caption{Another pair of curves corresponding to (\ref{eq:in6}) (solid curve) and (\ref{eq:in7}) (dashed curve). In this case the parameters in the equation of motion (\ref{eq:in1}) are the same as in Fig. \ref{fig:infig1}, except for the drive amplitude, $A$, which is now 1.87. Note the presence of three intersections of the two curves. }
\label{fig:infig1pp}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
The curves for $x(t)$ corresponding to the three intersections are shown in Fig. \ref{fig:infig2pp}. The relationship between the two skewed solutions is the same as the relationship between ``mirror image'' solutions established for solutions to (\ref{eq:eom1}) in Appendix \ref{app:pairs}. In fact, the argument in Appendix B is easily extended to incorporate the inertial term in the equation of motion (\ref{eq:in1}).
\begin{figure}[htbp]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=3in]{infig2pp.pdf}
\caption{The three solutions corresponding to the intersections in Fig. \ref{fig:infig1pp}. The two solid curves are the two stable, skewed solutions to the equation of motion (\ref{eq:in1}), while the dashed curve is a symmetric and unstable solution to that equation. The horizontal lines indicate the limit of the region in which the restoring force is Hookean. }.
\label{fig:infig2pp}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
The question of the stability of the solutions of (\ref{eq:in6}) and (\ref{eq:in7}) can be addressed in a straightforward manner. Imagine that $x_F$ and $p_F$ are such simultaneous solutions. Then, if $x_0=x_F + \Delta x$ and $p_0=p_F + \Delta p$,
\begin{eqnarray}
x_1 & = &x_F+ \Delta x^{\prime} \nonumber \\ & = & X(x_F+ \Delta x, p_F + \Delta p) \nonumber \\ & = & x_F + X_x \Delta x + X_p \Delta p \label{eq:ex1} \\ p_1 & = & p_F + \Delta p^{\prime} \nonumber \\& = & p_F + P_x \Delta x + P_p \Delta p \label{eq:ex2}
\end{eqnarray}
or
\begin{equation}
\left( \begin{array}{l} \Delta x^{\prime} \\ \Delta p^{\prime} \end{array} \right) = \left( \begin{array}{ll} X_x & X_p \\ P_x & P_p \end{array} \right) \left(\begin{array}{ll} \Delta x \\ \Delta p \end{array} \right) \label{eq:ex3}
\end{equation}
from which we infer that the stability of the solutions is controlled by the eigenvalues of the matrix on the right hand side of (\ref{eq:ex3}). If both have absolute value less than 1, the fixed point at $x_F$, $y_F$ is stable; otherwise it is unstable. It is possible to determine the elements of the matrix numerically by exploring the recursion relations in the vicinity of the fixed point. Using this analysis, we find that the single intersection shown in Fig. \ref{fig:infig1} is stable and that the intersections on the far right and far left of Fig. \ref{fig:infig1pp} also represent dynamically stable solutions to the simultaneous equations (\ref{eq:in6}) and (\ref{eq:in7}) -- while the central intersection, which gives rise to the steady state solution shown dashed in Fig. \ref{fig:infig2pp}, corresponds to a dynamically unstable solution to the equation of motion (\ref{eq:in1}).
An alternate approach to the stability analysis of the steady state solutions to (\ref{eq:in1}) is described in Appendix \ref{app:instability}.
The above results strongly indicate the the types of dynamical transitions that we find when inertia is
neglected are also to be expected in a system that manifests inertia. A more comprehensive exploration of the nature of viscoelastic behavior in such systems, including the range of dynamical transitions that one may encounter, remains to be undertaken.
\section{Noise} \label{sec:noise}
\subsection{Langevin equation approach} \label{subset:langevin}
As noted in the Introduction our original motivation was a series of experiments on the mechanical properties of a driven natively folded protein in solution at room temperature. Clearly this is a noisy environment, and it behooves us to examine which features we have uncovered survive the introduction of fluctuations, thermal and otherwise. In this section we briefly and qualitatively consider some of the modifications that arise when noise is introduced into the over-damped equation of motion, Eq. (\ref{eq:eom1}).
For a specific example, we take the nonlinear restoring force to be the one defined in Appendix A, with $F_0=0, \alpha=0.01$. The restoring force is linear in displacement for $|x|$ less then about unity, decaying to zero restoring force outside that interval, as sketched in Fig. \ref{fig:enforce} with $F_0 = 0$.
With noise the dynamical equation is
\begin{equation}
\frac{dx(t)}{dt} = \frac{1}{\gamma} [-V^{\prime}(x(t)) + A \sin ( \omega t)] + \eta(t) \label{eq:v29}
\end{equation}
where $\eta(t)$ is a Gaussian random variable, corresponding to white noise, with correlator
\begin{equation}
\langle \eta(t) \eta(t^{\prime}) \rangle = \Gamma \delta(t-t^{\prime}) \label{eq:v30}
\end{equation}
We do not assume a fluctuation-dissipation relation and take $\gamma$ and $\Gamma$ as independent parameters.
A simple Euler forward integration leads to
\begin{equation}
x(t + \delta t) = x(t) + \frac{\delta t}{\gamma} [-V^{\prime}(x(t)) + A \sin ( \omega t)] + \sqrt{\Gamma \delta t} \, y_i \label{eq:v31}
\end{equation}
where $y_i$ is a Gaussian random variable with zero mean and unit standard deviation. As an example, we choose parameters for which the noise-free system has a first order transition from a ``phase" at sufficiently low driving amplitude $A$ in which there is a single, stable steady state, which is symmetric, to a phase (probably not physically reachable, occupying a tiny region of parameter space) at higher driving amplitude with three stable solutions, one symmetric and a pair of skewed solutions and, finally, at even higher amplitude drive to a phase in which only the skewed solutions are stable. For reference, for the parameters we choose, the noise-free dynamical transition occurs with amplitude about $A\simeq1.89$. A realization of the three-solution situation with added noise is shown for $A=1.89$ in Fig. \ref{fig:noise1}.
\begin{figure}[htbp]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=3in]{newnoisefig.pdf}
\caption{One realization of the solution to the stochastic equation (\ref{eq:v29}) when the noise-free system is in the vicinity of a first-order dynamical phase transition from a phase with a single symmetric solution to a phase with three stable (noise free) steady state solutions, one symmetric about $x=0$ and a pair of skewed solutions. The restoring force is provided in Appendix \ref{app:restore} with $\alpha=0.01, k=2, F_0=0$. Other parameters: drive amplitude, $A=1.89$, frequency, $\omega=0.5$, noise correlator, $\Gamma=0.0001$.}
\label{fig:noise1}
\end{figure}
The noise level $\Gamma = 10^{-4}$ has been chosen so that the noise-driven switching between the stable solutions is apparent. The nature of the switching will be considered in future work. With this level of noise, the single symmetric solution below the transition is unremarkable and not shown.
For modest levels of noise, such as those considered above, qualitatively one expects the sharp noise-free transitions to be rounded, but to retain hints of the underlying noise-free transitions. This is, in fact realized. However, the calculation turns out to be more straightforwardly carried out in the context of the Fokker-Planck equation, to which we turn now.
\subsection{Master equation}\label{sec:FPE}
The dynamical equation with noise, Eq. \ref{eq:v29} is Markovian, of the form $\dot{x}=h(x,t)+\eta(t)$, where, as above, $\eta(t)$ is delta-correlated with {\it constant} $\Gamma$, and $h(x,t)$ contains the ``systematic" restoring force and the time-dependent driving force. As shown, e.g., in \cite{Risken}, one can reformulate the analysis of this equation into a probability distribution, $P(x,t)$, of an ensemble of solutions to the noisy equation of motion. This distribution is governed by the Fokker-Planck equation,
\begin{eqnarray}
\frac{\partial}{\partial t} P(x,t) &=& -\frac{\partial}{\partial x}D^{(1)}(x,t) P(x,t) \nonumber \\
{} & & + \left(\frac{\partial}{\partial x}\right)^2 D^{(2)}(x,t) P(x,t) \label{eq:FPE1} \\
D^{(1)}(x,t) &=& h(x,t) \label{eq:FPE2} \\
D^{(2)}(x,t) &=& \Gamma/2 \label{eq:FPE3}
\label{eq:fpe}
\end{eqnarray}
In our case, the quantity $h(x,t)$ is the driving force $F(x(t)) + A \sin(\omega t)$. As an example of the utilization of this equation, we apply it to the case of a discontinuous transition described in Sec. \ref{sec:transnature}. Initially, we take $\Gamma = 0.2$, with the amplitude, $A$ equal to 2.7.
\begin{figure}[htbp]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=3in]{FPE_evolution.jpg}
\caption{The probability distribution, $P(x,t)$ as given by the solution of the Fokker-Planck equation (\ref{eq:FPE1})--(\ref{eq:FPE3}), with $A=2.7$, $\omega=0.5$, $k=2$, $F_0=0$ and $\Gamma=0.2$. Ten periods of the driving force are shown. Lighter colors correspond to higher values of $P(x,t)$. The distribution at $t=0$ was chosen to center on one of the dynamically stable skewed solutions to the deterministic equation of motion. }
\label{fig:FPE_evolution}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
At this amplitude there are two stable skewed solutions and one unstable symmetric solution. The initial distribution was chosen to center on one of the skewed solutions. As illustrated in Fig. \ref{fig:FPE_evolution} the distribution evolves toward one that is symmetric. That is, both skewed solutions are equally represented in the steady state distribution. In fact, one can readily demonstrate that if $P(x,t)$ is a solution to Eqs. (\ref{eq:FPE1})--(\ref{eq:FPE3}), then so is $P(-x,t+ \pi/\omega)$. In Fig. \ref{fig:FPE_steadystate}, we show the steady state distribution for one period, along with the two stable skewed solutions and the unstable symmetric solution for zero noise.
\begin{figure}[htbp]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=3in]{FPE_steadystate.jpg}
\caption{ One period (the twentieth) of the probability distribution, $P(x,t)$ as given by the solution of the Fokker-Planck equation (\ref{eq:FPE1})--(\ref{eq:FPE3}), with $A=2.7$, $\omega=0.5$, $k=2$, $F_0=0$ and $\Gamma=0.2$. Also shown are the two stable skewed solutions (solid red curves) and the unstable symmetric solution (dashed red curve). Lighter colors correspond to higher values of $P(x,t)$.}
\label{fig:FPE_steadystate}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
\subsection{Compliances in the presence of noise} \label{sec:noisecomplainces}
Making use of the steady state probability distribution, one can calculate the effect of noise on compliances. Figure \ref{fig:noisecomp}, displays the results for the compliances in the case in which the parameters in the noise-free equation of motion are such that Eq. (\ref{eq:eom1}) predicts a first order transition from a dynamically stable symmetric solution to stable skewed solutions. In this calculation, $\Gamma$ is taken to be $0.014$---significantly higher values of this quantity lead to a washing out of evidence of a dynamical transition. Here the compliances are defined as in Sec. \ref{sec:compliances}, with $x(t)$ replaced by $\langle x(t) \rangle$, the average being taken with respect to the distribution function $P(x,t)$, i.e. $\langle x(t) \rangle = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} x^{\prime}P(x^{\prime},t) dx^{\prime}$.
\begin{figure}[htbp]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=3in]{noisecomp.pdf}
\caption{The total compliance $I_t/A$ (solid black curve), the dissipative compliance, $I_{d}/A$ (long-dashed blue curve) and the storage compliance, $I_s/A$ (dashed red curve). Here $k=2$, $\omega=0.5$, $F_0=0$ and $\Gamma=0.014$. }
\label{fig:noisecomp}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
The plot in Fig. \ref{fig:noisecomp} is to be compared with Fig. \ref{fig:phaset2}, the plot of compliances in the absence of noise. In the presence of noise the transition from an elastic to a viscous response regime no longer displays a first order discontinuity.
\section{Concluding remarks} \label{sec:concluding}
The investigations of Zocchi \textit{et al. } \cite{zocchi1,zocchi2,zocchi4,zocchi3} of the response of a folded protein to a sinusoidal driving force point to a description in terms of a single collective coordinate. Moreover, the response appears to be quantifiable in terms of a viscoelastic formalism, with the additional feature of a sharp transition from dominantly elastic response at low amplitude drive to mainly viscous response at high drive amplitude. We find that a simple model exhibits behavior consistent with those observations. From such analysis we conclude that the combination of experimental findings and characterization in terms of a simple model by Zocchi et al. forms a promising basis for a comprehensive description of the gross mechanical and dynamical properties of a class of folded proteins. Furthermore, we strongly believe that it ought to be useful in further investigations, both experimental and theoretical, of those properties.
Extensions of the present study should aid in the development of insights into the structural properties of proteins, both in isolation and as components of larger systems. For example, it would be interesting to expand the characterization of a protein configuration beyond a single collective variable, to take into account internal adjustments to external influences. Given the size and complexity of those molecules the number of mechanical degrees of freedom will be considerable. However, judicious analysis should allow the investigator to expand the set of dynamical variables to a manageable size. Additionally, the effects of inertia, while small, are almost certainly non-negligible, and the effects of noise deserve fuller attention.
The existence of a dynamical phase transition in the simple model studied here deserves note in and of itself, and the genesis of this transition merits further study. It would be of great interest to identify the essential characteristics of a nonlinear system that lead to this phenomenon. As regards symmetry breaking, a crucial aspect of the model is the existence of a symmetry in the underlying equation of motion, in particular the fact that the restoring force, $F(x)$ satisfies $F(-x)=-F(x)$; a similar symmetry is present in the Suzuki-Kubo model \cite{sk,TandO}. However, the protein conformation is almost certainly not consistent with such a force, given that the collective co-ordinate $x$ will have one sign---say positive---when the protein is stretched and the opposite sign when it is compressed. It is entirely reasonable to expect that the ``cracking'' process, in which a linear restoring force is replaced by another relationship between that force and the relative displacements in the protein, will differ in those two regimes, which means that there is no symmetry to break. Nevertheless, as shown in Appendix \ref{app:skewed}, even in the absence of such intrinsic asymmetry, the equation of motion can nevertheless lead to the kind of dynamical transition discussed in this paper. Thus, there are good reasons to expect that the response observed by Zocchi and co-workers does indeed arise from a true dynamical phase transition.
\begin{acknowledgements}
We are grateful to Profs. Giovani Zocchi and Jonathan Rubin for interesting and helpful discussions. JR acknowledges support from the National Science Foundation through DMR Grants 1006128 and 1309423.
\end{acknowledgements}
\begin{appendix}
\section{The nonlinear restoring force} \label{app:restore}
The form for the restoring force derives from the function
\begin{equation}
\Delta(x, \alpha) =\frac{1}{\pi} \frac{\alpha}{x^2 + \alpha^2} \label{eq:restore1}
\end{equation}
In the limit $\alpha =0$, this is just the Dirac delta function. Two functions that result from integrating this function once and then twice are
\begin{eqnarray}
f_1(x, \alpha) & = & \frac{2 \tan ^{-1}\left(x/\alpha\right)}{\pi } \label{eq:restore2} \\
f_2(x, \alpha) & = &\frac{2 \left(x \tan ^{-1}\left(x/\alpha \right)-\frac{1}{2} \alpha
\ln \left(\alpha ^2+x^2\right)\right)}{\pi } \nonumber \\ \label{eq:restore3}
\end{eqnarray}
Then, with coefficients
\begin{eqnarray}
A & = & -\frac{2 \alpha F_0 - \pi k(1+ \alpha ^2) }{4 \left((1+\alpha ^2) \tan
^{-1}\left(1/\alpha \right)-\alpha \right)} \nonumber \\ && -\frac{F_0}{2} \label{eq:restore4} \\
B & = & -\frac{2 \alpha F_0 -\pi k(1+ \alpha ^2) }{4 \left((1+\alpha ^2) \tan
^{-1}\left(1/\alpha \right)-\alpha \right)} \label{eq:restore5}
\end{eqnarray}
The function
\begin{eqnarray}
\lefteqn{A \left(f_1(x+1, \alpha)+f_1(x-1,\alpha) \right)} \nonumber \\ && + B \left( f_2(x-1,\alpha)-f_2(x+1,\alpha) \right) \label{eq:restore6}
\end{eqnarray}
has the form shown in Fig. \ref{fig:enforce}, with slope $-k$ at the origin and asymptotes of $\pm F_0$. The parameter $\alpha$ determines the sharpness of the transition from a linear restoring force to a restoring force that is constant. This cumbersome expression for the restoring force enables independent variation of the features controlled by $\alpha$ and $F_0$. Figure \ref{fig:3Forces} displays three instances of the kind of restoring force that we explore.
\begin{figure}[htbp]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=3in]{3Forces.pdf}
\caption{Three instances of restoring forces arising from (\ref{eq:restore6}). In all cases, the absolute value of the slope of the curve at $x=0$ is $k=2$, and the absolute value of the asymptote is $F_0=0.3$. The parameter $\alpha$ controlling the transition between the central and outer region is 0.01 for the solid curve, 0.1 for the short-dashed curve and 0.5 for the long-dashed curve. The restoring force changes from Hookean to constant near $x=\pm1$. }
\label{fig:3Forces}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
In the body of the paper we have taken the transition from Hookean behavior to occur around $|x| =1$.
\section{Pairs of skewed solutions} \label{app:pairs}
The form of the equation of motion, (\ref{eq:eom1}) and the symmetry of the restoring force,
\begin{equation}
F(x) =-F(-x) \label{eq:pair1}
\end{equation}
allow one to generate, from a solution $x(t)$, a ``mirror image'' solution equal to $-x(t+ \pi/\omega)$. To see this, replace $t$ by $t+ \pi/\omega$ in (\ref{eq:eom1}), which leads to
\begin{eqnarray}
\frac{dx(t + \pi/\omega)}{dt} &=& \frac{1}{\gamma} \left[F(x(t+ \pi/\omega)) + A \sin(\omega(t+ \pi/\omega)) \right] \nonumber \\
& = & \frac{1}{\gamma} \left[ -F (-x(t + \pi/\omega)) - A \sin (\omega t) \right] \label{eq:pair2}
\end{eqnarray}
If we now multiply both sides of the resulting equation by $-1$, we end up with the result that $-x(t + \pi/\omega)$ satisfies the same equation as $x(t)$. This allows one to generate, from any skewed solution, a second one, skewed in the opposite direction. By contrast, a symmetric solution will reproduce itself under this transformation.
\section{Stability analysis for solutions to the equation of motion in Sec. \ref{sec:analytical} }\label{app:stability}
To assess the stability of a solution of the equation of motion when the restoring force exhibits a sharp break between Hooke's Law and vanishing amplitude as in (\ref{eq:forcelim1}), we perturb that equation as follows. Assume a solution, $x_0(t)$, to (\ref{eq:eom1}). Then, write $x(t) =x_0(t) + \delta x(t)$. At first order in the perturbation $\delta x(t)$, the equation becomes
\begin{equation}
\frac{d \delta x(t)}{dt} = \frac{1}{\gamma} \left[\delta x(t) F^{\prime}(x_0(t)) \right] \label{eq:sa1}
\end{equation}
Dividing both sides of (\ref{eq:sa1}) by $\delta x(t)$ and integrating over a period of the drive, we find
\begin{equation}
\ln \left(\frac{\delta x (t+ 2 \pi/\omega)}{\delta x(t)} \right) = \frac{1}{\gamma} \int_t^{t+2 \pi/\omega} F^{\prime}(x_0(t)) dt \label{eq:sa2}
\end{equation}
or
\begin{equation}
\frac{\delta x (t+ 2 \pi/\omega)}{\delta x(t)} = \exp \left[ \frac{1}{\gamma}\int_t^{t+ 2 \pi/\omega}F^{\prime}(x_0(t) ) dt \right] \label{eq:sa3}
\end{equation}
Figure \ref{fig:forceandderivative} shows a restoring force that changes abruptly from Hookean to vanishing, along with its derivative.
\begin{figure}[htbp]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=3in]{forceandderivative.pdf}
\caption{Restoring force with a rapid transition between Hooke's law in a region about the origin (dashed curve) along with its derivative (solid curve). When the transition is perfectly abrupt the peaks in the force derivative become Dirac delta functions. }
\label{fig:forceandderivative}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
In the limit of a discontinuous transition, the peaks in the derivative become Dirac delta functions. If we are interested in the skewed solutions described in Sec. \ref{sec:analytical}, then the integral on the right hand side of (\ref{eq:sa2}) and (\ref{eq:sa3}) yields three contributions. The first is from the interior region and will be equal to $-k$ multiplied by the amount of time that $x(t) < x_0$, which, according to (\ref{eq:window}), is $2 \pi/\omega -2t_0$. Then there is the result of integrating through the very narrow peaks in the derivative. Here, we write
\begin{eqnarray}
\int F^{\prime}(x_0(t)) dt &= & \int \frac{F^{\prime}(x_0(t))}{dx_0(t)/dt} dx_0(t) \nonumber \\
& = & \int \frac{F^{\prime}(x)}{ F(x) \pm A \sin(\omega t_0)}dx \nonumber \\
& \rightarrow & \pm \ln \left[ \frac{A \sin (\omega t_0)}{A \sin (\omega t_0) \mp kx_0}\right] \label{eq:sa4}
\end{eqnarray}
The upper sign on the right hand side of (\ref{eq:sa4}) applies in the case that the trajectory through the peak in the derivative is out of the inner region and the lower sign applies when the trajectory is into the inner region. The time, $t$ has been set equal to $t_0$, as passage through the peaks occurs in effectively a single instant of time. Assembling the two contributions we fnd for the right hand side of (\ref{eq:sa3})
\begin{eqnarray}
\exp \left[-\frac{k}{\gamma}\left(\frac{2 \pi}{\omega}-2t_0 \right) + \frac{1}{\gamma} \ln \left(\frac{ (A \sin (\omega t_0))^2}{(A \sin( \omega t_0))^2-(kx_0)^2}\right)\right] \nonumber \\ \label{eq:sa5}
\end{eqnarray}
If the expression in square brackets is real and negative then perturbations to the trajectory $x_0(t)$ die off, and the periodic solution to the equation of motion is stable. If it is positive, then those perturbations grow exponentially, and the solution is unstable. If the expression is imaginary, then the assumption of a solution is incorrect, in that the velocity at one of the transitions between Hooke's law force and no restoring force has the wrong sign. We find that in the case of graphical solutions to Eq. (\ref{eq:v9}) that are not equal to $\pi/\omega$, the one with a smaller value of $t_0$ does not correspond to an actual trajectory, and the one with the larger value of $t_0$ corresponds to a dynamically stable solution to the equation of motion.
\section{Review of the statistical mechanics of tricriticality} \label{app:tricrit}
According to the canonical model of tricritical points based on an order parameter, the thermodynamic behavior of a system near a symmetry breaking phase transition is governed by a free energy of the form
\begin{equation}
\mathcal{F(\psi)} = \mathcal{F}_0 + Ct \psi^2 + u \psi^4 + v \psi^6 \label{eq:tc1}
\end{equation}
Here, $\psi$ is the order parameter and $t$ is a reduced temperature, proportional to the difference between the actual temperature of the system and a critical temperature. The coefficients $C>0$, $u$ and $v$ are assumed to be insensitive to the temperature as long as $t$ is sufficiently small. Thermodynamic stability requires $v > 0$; otherwise, the free energy takes on unbounded negative values as $|\psi|$ increases. The system described by this free energy settles into the state of lowest free energy, determined by minimizing $\mathcal{F}( \psi)$. The results of this minimizing procedure depend qualitatively on the sign of the coefficient $u$. When $u$ is positive, the $\psi$-dependence of $\mathcal{F}$ is as shown in Fig. \ref{fig:tc1}.
\begin{figure}[htbp]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=3in]{tricrit1.pdf}
\caption{Behavior of the free energy $\mathcal{F}(\psi)$ in (\ref{eq:tc1}) when the coefficients $u$ and $v$ are positive. The blue, dashed curve is the free energy when $t>0$. The red, long-dashed, curve is the free energy when $t<0$. The solid black curve is $\mathcal{F}(\psi)$ at the transition point, when $t=0$. }
\label{fig:tc1}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
As shown in the figure, when $t>0$, the unique minimum of the free energy is at $\psi=0$. On the other hand, when $t<0$, there are two minima, spaced equidistant from $\psi=0$. The minimum at $\psi=0$ has become a free energy maximum. In mechanics, that maximum would correspond to a point of unstable equilibrium, in contrast to the minima, which represent points of stable equilibrium. However, a thermodynamic system will inevitably fluctuate away from such a state. Because the free energy is even in $\psi$, in that $\mathcal{F}(- \psi) = \mathcal{F}(\psi)$, each of the minima for $t<0$, which lies to one side or the other of the origin, represents a violation of the symmetry of the physics underlying the system's thermodynamics, and the transition that occurs as $t$ passes through zero is called a \textit{symmetry breaking} phase transition. The determination of the minima follows from the solution of the equation
\begin{equation}
\frac{d \mathcal{F}(\psi)}{d \psi} =0 \label{eq:tc2}
\end{equation}
On the other hand, when $u <0$, the behavior of $\mathcal{F}(\psi)$ is shown in Fig. \ref{fig:tc1a}.
\begin{figure}[htbp]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=3in]{tricrit1a.pdf}
\caption{The graphical representation of $d \mathcal{F}( \psi)/d \psi$. The curves follow the format of Fig. \ref{fig:tc1}. }
\label{fig:tc1a}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
In this case, the minima at non-zero values of $\psi$ develop while there is still a free energy minimum at $\psi=0$. As that occurs two free energy maxima appear between the new minima and the free energy minimum at $\psi=0$. Eventually, at low enough temperatures, the only minima are at finite $\psi$, with one free energy maximum at $\psi=0$. Free energies and the related curves for the free energy derivative are displayed in Figs. \ref{fig:tc2} and \ref{fig:tc2a}.
\begin{figure}[htbp]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=3in]{tricrit2.pdf}
\caption{Curves for $\mathcal{F}( \psi)$ when the fourth order coefficient $u$ is negative. At high enough temperatures (blue long dashed curve) there is one free energy minimum, at $\psi=0$. As the temperature is lowered, two other minima emerge (blue dashed curve and solid black curve). In addition, two maxima that separate the minimum at $\psi=0$ and the flanking minima appear. At low enough temperatures the two minima at non-zero $\psi$ remain, the central extremum in the free energy having become a maximum (red long-dashed curve).}
\label{fig:tc2}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure}[htbp]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=3in]{tricrit2a.pdf}
\caption{ Curves for $d \mathcal{F}( \psi)/d \psi$ corresponding to the curves shown in Fig. \ref{fig:tc1}. These curves pass through zero at extrema---maxima and minima---of $\mathcal{F}( \psi)$. They are formatted in the same way as the free energy curves in Fig. \ref{fig:tc2}.}
\label{fig:tc2a}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
Focusing on the curves in Fig. \ref{fig:tc2a}, we see that at high enough temperatures, there is only one value of $\psi$ at which $d \mathcal{F} (\psi)/ d \psi$ passes through zero: $\psi=0$. As the temperature is lowered additional zeros appear, first four, two on each side of the origin, corresponding to a maximum and then a minimum in $\mathcal{F}( \psi)$. At even lower temperatures, only three zeros remain, corresponding to minima at non-zero values of $\psi$, while the zero at $\psi=0$ refers to a free energy maximum at that point.
\section{Alternate stability analysis of steady state solutions to (\ref{eq:in1})} \label{app:instability}
As an alternate approach to the stability analysis of steady state solutions to (\ref{eq:in1}), obtained by determining simultaneous solutions to (\ref{eq:in6}) and (\ref{eq:in7}), we return to the original equation (\ref{eq:in1}) and expand about periodic solution, $x_0(t)$. That is, write $x(t) = x_0(t) + \delta x(t)$. The equation satisfied by $\delta x(t) $ is
\begin{equation}
\frac{d^2 \delta x(t)}{dt^2} + \gamma \frac{d\delta x(t)}{dt} = F^{\prime}(x_0(t)) \delta x(t) \label{eq:in12}
\end{equation}
Then, we write $\delta x(t) = \psi(t) e^{- \gamma t/2}$. The equation for $\psi(t)$ is
\begin{equation}
\frac{d^2 \psi(t)}{dt^2} - \left(\frac{\gamma}{2} \right)^2 \psi(t) = F^{\prime}(x_0(t)) \psi(t) \label{eq:in13}
\end{equation}
Because of the periodicity of $x_0(t)$, this is just like the Schr\"{o}dinger equation of a particle in a periodic potential. The periodicity is that of the driving force. We can now treat this as a problem in one dimensional band theory \cite{AandM}. We start with a solution of the above equation, $\psi_1(t)$ that has the initial conditions
\begin{eqnarray}
\psi_1(0) & = & 1 \label{eq:in14} \\
\psi_1^{\prime}(0) & = & 0 \label{eq:in15}
\end{eqnarray}
and a function $\psi_2(t)$ satisfying
\begin{eqnarray}
\psi_2(0) & = & 0 \label{eq:in16} \\
\psi_2^{\prime}(0) & = & 1 \label{eq:in17}
\end{eqnarray}
A general solution will be a linear combination of $\psi_1(t)$ and $\psi_2(t)$, where the coefficients are determined, for example, by the value of the solution and the value of its derivative at $t=0$. If we write
\begin{equation}
\psi(t) = A \psi_1(t) + B \psi_2(t) \label{eq:in18}
\end{equation}
Then,
\begin{eqnarray}
A & = & \psi(0) \label{eq:in19} \\
B & = & \psi^{\prime}(0) \label{eq:in20}
\end{eqnarray}
After one full period, the magnitude and derivative of the solution is given by
\begin{eqnarray}
A^{\prime} & = & A \psi_1(2 \pi/\omega) + B \psi_2(2 \pi/\omega) \label{eq:in21} \\
B^{\prime} & = & A \psi_1^{\prime}(2 \pi/\omega) + B \psi_1^{\prime}(2 \pi/\omega) \label{eq:in22}
\end{eqnarray}
This gives rise to the map
\begin{equation}
\left( \begin{array}{l} A^{\prime} \\ B^{\prime} \end{array}\right) = \left(\begin{array}{ll} \psi_1(2 \pi/\omega) & \psi_1 (2 \pi/\omega) \\ \psi_1^{\prime}(2 \pi/\omega) & \psi_2^{\prime}(2 \pi/\omega)\end{array} \right) \left( \begin{array}{l} A \\ B \end{array}\right) \label{eq:in23}
\end{equation}
We know from the invariance of the Wronskian and from its value at $t=0$ that
\begin{equation}
\psi_1(t) \psi_1^{\prime}(t) - \psi_1^{\prime}(t) \psi_2(t) =1 \label{eq:in24}
\end{equation}
for all $t$. This means that the determinant of the matrix in (\ref{eq:in23}) is equal to one.
Given that the relationship (\ref{eq:in23}) holds for the values of $A$ and $B$ for each succeeding period, the ultimate behavior of the solution is going to be determined by the eigenvalues of the matrix on the right hand side of that equation. In light of the relationship between $\delta x(t)$ and $\psi(t)$, we see that the stability of the solution is going to be determined by the exponential $e^{- \gamma \pi/\omega}$ and the eigenvalues. Specifically, by the product
\begin{eqnarray}
\lefteqn{e^{- \gamma \pi/\omega} \frac{1}{2} \Bigg[\psi_1( 2 \pi/\omega) + \psi_2^{\prime}(2 \pi/\omega) }\nonumber \\ && \pm \sqrt{(\psi_1( 2 \pi/\omega) + \psi_2^{\prime}(2 \pi/\omega))^2-4}\Bigg] \label{eq:in25}
\end{eqnarray}
If the absolute value of (\ref{eq:in25}) is less than one, for both signs in the expression, then the solution is stable, and if that is not the case the solution is unstable. The result in (\ref{eq:in25}) follows in part from the fact that the determinant of the matrix in (\ref{eq:in23}) is equal to one.
Making use of the above method, we arrive at the same conclusions regarding the steady state solutions to the equation of motion (\ref{eq:in1}) shown in Sec. \ref{sec:inertia}.
\section{Dynamical transition when the force is inherently asymmetric} \label{app:skewed}
We have been considering a system in which the force, $F(x)$ that restores it to stable equilibrium in the absence of an external drive is symmetric in the dynamical variable that characterizes its distortion from that state in that $F(-x) = -F(x)$. It is natural to ask whether this symmetry in the equation of motion is essential to the existence of the dynamical transitions discussed here. As it turns out those transitions can also arise when the underlying symmetry is absent. Consider the restoring force shown in Fig. \ref{fig:sk1}.
\begin{figure}[htbp]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=3in]{sk1a.pdf}
\caption{A restoring force, $F(x)$ that is Hookean for all positive values of $x$ but that reverts to zero at $x=-1$. The spring constant in the Hookean regime is $k=2$. }
\label{fig:sk1}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
As shown in that figure, the force is of the form $F=-kx$, with spring constant $k=2$ for $x <1$. Outside of that region the restoring force is equal to zero.
In Fig. \ref{fig:sk2} we see the map from $x(0)$ to $x( 2 \pi/\omega)$, along with the $45^{\circ}$ line for drive amplitude $A=2.762$, frequency $\omega=2$ and $\gamma=1$ in the equation of motion (\ref{eq:eom1}).
\begin{figure}[htbp]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=3in]{sk2.pdf}
\caption{The map from $x(0)$ to $x(2 \pi/ \omega)$ generated by the equation of motion (\ref{eq:eom1}) with the restoring force shown in Fig. \ref{fig:sk1} and $\omega=2$, $\gamma=1$ and $A=2.762$. The points of intersection between the map and the $45^{\circ}$ line, also shown, are indicated by small circles. The two outer intersections correspond to dynamically stable steady state solutions to the equation of motion, while the inner intersection corresponds to a dynamically unstable steady state solution.}
\label{fig:sk2}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
This kind of map is consistent with the existence of two stable fixed point solutions and one unstable solution; Fig, \ref{fig:sk3} shows those three solutions. This coexistence points to a dynamical transition identical to sharp transitions described in the body of this paper, the only difference being the absence of symmetry breaking; there is no underlying symmetry to break.
\begin{figure}[htbp]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=3in]{sk3.pdf}
\caption{The three steady state solutions to the equation of motion corresponding to the points of intersection in Fig. \ref{fig:sk2}, plotted over two periods of the drive, $A \sin(\omega t)$. The thick red curve corresponds to a trajectory that lies entirely in the region in which the restoring force is linear. The thin blue curve is the stable solution that extends outside that region ($x<-1$), and the dashed curve is the dynamically unstable solution that separates the two stable solutions for $x(t)$. }
\label{fig:sk3}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
As further evidence for the dynamical transition, Fig. \ref{fig:sk4} contains the maps for four different drive amplitudes in the same region plotted in Fig. \ref{fig:sk3}. This plot is to be compared with the maps shown in Fig. \ref{fig:fograph}.
\begin{figure}[htbp]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=3in]{sk4.pdf}
\caption{Illustrating a first order transition in the case in which the restoring force is as shown in Fig. \ref{fig:sk1}. The parameters are as described in the caption to Fig. \ref{fig:sk2}, except for the values of the drive amplitudes. Those amplitudes are 2.755 (intermediate dashed blue curve), 2.762 (short dashed red curve), 2.775 (solid black curve) and 2.78 (long dashed red curve). Note that there are no more than three steady state solutions to the equation of motion and that at the extremes there is only one steady state solution to the equation of motion (\ref{eq:eom1}), in contrast to the case of the symmetry breaking dynamical phase transition. }
\label{fig:sk4}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
The parameters are as described in Fig. \ref{fig:sk2}, except for the drive amplitudes, which range from $A=2.755$ to $A=2.78$. The discussion of the scenario corresponding to this figure parallels the corresponding commentary just above Fig. \ref{fig:fograph}.
The noteworthy results here are, first, that at the highest drive amplitude there is only one skewed steady state solution to the equation of motion instead of two and, second, that when there is more than one solution, the two dynamically stable ones correspond to a symmetric solution and a single skewed solution, separated by an unstable steady state solution, as plotted in Fig. \ref{fig:sk3}.
\end{appendix}
|
\section{Introduction}
Cutaneous recordings of gastric electrical activity (GEA)
known as electrogastrography (\egg),
can play a major role in the diagnosis
of gastric motility disorders~\cite{Smout80}.
Because of its low-cost and
non-invasiveness, the \egg technique has great appeal as a
clinical tool
and has been related to various gastric motility abnormalities~\cite{Borto98}.
Multiple studies have been conducted in other to analyze \egg recordings.
Although signal processing of \egg signals has been considered essential for
extracting clinically relevant information,
various traditional methods have been utilized with limited success~\cite{Verhagen:1999}.
Recently, advanced signal processing techniques, such as
wavelets, have been employed to analyze
electrogastrograms~\cite{Xie98,Ryu:02,Liang96,Liang02,Qiao96}.
This approach has been used to
(i)~propose new wavelets that can offer a better time-frequency localization of
\egg recordings~\cite{Xie98,Ryu:02};
(ii)~perform noise detection in \egg signals~\cite{Liang96};
(iii)~cancel artifacts related to stimulation~\cite{Liang02};
and
(iv)~characterize global gastric electrical dysrhythmias~\cite{Qiao96}.
An important aspect of wavelet analysis
is related to designing a wavelet that matches a class of signals.
Although wavelet matching can be of great importance
for detection and classification~\cite{Chapa2000},
wavelets that match \egg signals have not been systematically sought.
The present study addresses the problem of finding a wavelet that best ``matches''
the waveshape of \egg signals in basal state.
Although there are numerous issues concerning
the choice of wavelet for signal analysis~\cite{Chapa2000},
generally,
a wavelet can be regarded as best suited to a class of signals
if the latter can be represented by
as few wavelet coefficients as possible~\cite{Mallat:03,Vetterli:2001}.
Thus, wavelets which resemble the waveshape of the signal under analysis are often selected.
In the framework of the proposed research methodology,
an optimal wavelet is sought that can adequately
represent a wavelet-compressed \egg signal at a given
compression ratio.
The optimality is detected by minimizing
an error measure between the original signal and its
compressed version, subject to the choice of wavelet.
If,
for a given wavelet,
the error associated with the compressed signal were minimal,
then
its wavelet coefficients were considered to best represent the original signal.
Therefore,
the selected wavelet would more effectively ``match''
the signal under analysis when compared to other wavelets in consideration~\cite{Gopi1994}.
Consequently, the ultimate aim of this study is to quantitatively determine
a wavelet suitable for the analysis of basal \egg recordings in canine and human models.
\section{Methods}
\medskip
\subsection{Experimental Setup}
\subsubsection{Canine Experiments}
After a laparotomy and the installment of six pairs of internal
subserosal stainless steel wire electrodes into the antral gastric
wall of sixteen acute dogs (seven female and nine male),
the abdominal wall was closed and five neonatal
electrodes (Conmed, Andover Medical, Haverhill, MA, USA)
were placed cutaneously along the projection of the gastric axis.
These five electrodes were grouped to form eight \egg channels.
In addition,
the setup provided six internal GEA channels.
However, in the present study only the \egg channels were processed,
while
the internal GEA recordings were used as a visual reference only
to verify that normal electrical activity was present.
The electrode combination set and
a diagram of the physical location of the electrodes are depicted
in Figure~\ref{egg:pos}.
\begin{figure}
\centering
\subfigure[]{\includegraphics[scale=0.85]{stomach_closer_electrodes_no_cut.eps}}
\subfigure[]{\includegraphics[scale=0.85]{electrode_site.eps}}
\\
\subfigure[]{\input{electrode_table_gea.tex}}
\quad
\subfigure[]{\input{electrode_table_egg.tex}}
\caption{Internal~(a) and cutaneous~(b) electrode positioning in canine experiments.
Various electrode combinations were used for the GEA~(c) and the EGG~(d) recordings.
The electrode combination for the EGG recordings in human experiments was similar.}
\label{egg:pos}
\end{figure}
Thirty-minute \egg recordings were performed in the basal state.
The captured \egg signals were conditioned by a 0.02--0.2~\hertz\
low-pass
first order Butterworth active filter.
After amplification, 12-bit analog-to-digital conversion was performed
using a sampling frequency of 10~\hertz\
and
{\sc Labmaster 20009} 16-channel analog-to-digital converter
(Scientific Solutions, Vancouver, BC, Canada).
\subsubsection{Human Experiments}
Using a similar 8-channel \egg configuration,
one-hour recordings from six normal volunteers (two female, four male)
in postprandial state (500~Kcal, 52\% carbohydrates, 19\% proteins, and 29\% fat) were obtained.
The average body mass index for the volunteers was~22.2~\kilogram\!\cdot\!\rpsquare\metre\
(SD 3.0~\kilogram\!\cdot\!\rpsquare\metre).
Signal conditioning,
amplification and digitization process similar to
the ones utilized in the canine experiments were
implemented.
All experiments were approved by the Animal Welfare Committee and
the Ethics Committee at the Faculty of Medicine, University of Alberta.
\subsubsection{Signal Preprocessing}
Since both canine and human recordings were of significant
duration,
the raw \egg data
were intermittently contaminated with a multitude of artifacts,
including:
(i) motion artifacts;
(ii) spontaneous variations in electrode potentials;
(iii) respiration;
(iv) signal saturation during recording;
(v) electrocardiac activity;
and
(vi) loss of signal during recording.
Usually these artifacts appeared simultaneously in all recording channels.
Some of these noisy patterns were visually evident (e.g., iv and~vi)
and could be easily identified and
discarded~\cite{Verhagen:1999}.
This practice has been recommended before in order to obtain a more reliable signal for subsequent
analysis~\cite{Parkman:03}.
Therefore, for each subject, a 10-minute time interval
of channel-synchronized data
was manually selected.
These data were considered to be free from identifiable noise patterns.
\subsection{Signal Analysis}
\subsubsection{Wavelet Compression}
In a discrete-time formalism
wavelet transforms are performed via the Fast Wavelet Transform using
Mallat's pyramid algorithm for decomposition (forward transform) and
reconstruction (inverse transform)~\cite{Mallat:03}.
Let $\mathbf{x}$ be a discrete signal with $N=2^J$ points
(a sampled version of the analog signal $x(t)$).
The discrete wavelet transform (DWT) of $\mathbf{x}$ is computed in a recursive
cascade structure consisting of
decimators $\downarrow\!\!2$
and
complementing filters $h$ (low-pass) and $g$ (high-pass),
which are uniquely associated with a wavelet~\cite{MisiMisi00}.
Fig.~\ref{filter_bank} depicts a diagram of the filter bank structure.
At the end of the algorithm computation,
a set of vectors is obtained
$\{ \mathbf{d}_1, \mathbf{d}_2, \ldots, \mathbf{d}_j, \ldots, \mathbf{d}_{J_0}, \mathbf{a}_{J_0} \}$,
where~$J_0$ is
the number of decomposition scales of the DWT.
This set of approximation and detail vectors represents the DWT of the original signal.
Vectors~$\mathbf{d}_j$ contain the DWT detail coefficients of
the signal
in each scale~$j$.
As $j$ varies from~1 to $J_0$,
a finer or coarser
detail coefficient vector is obtained.
On the other hand, the vector~$\mathbf{a}_{J_0}$
contains the approximation coefficients of the signal at scale~$J_0$.
It should be noted that this recursive procedure can be iterated~$J$ times at most.
Usually, the procedure is iterated~$J_0< J$ times.
Depending on the choice of~$J_0$, a different set of
coefficients can be obtained.
Observe that the discrete signal~$\mathbf{x}$ and its DWT have the same length~$N$.
The inverse transform can be performed using a similar recursive approach~\cite{Mallat:03}.
Generally, a signal can be subject to various wavelet decompositions.
The analysis depends on
(i) the choice of wavelet (filters $h$ and $g$);
and
(ii) the number of decomposition levels (scales)~$J_0$.
\begin{figure}
\centering
\epsfig{file=iter_filter_bank.jpg.eps,width=1\linewidth}
\caption{Wavelet analysis filter bank. The signal is iteratively decomposed through
a filter bank to obtain its discrete wavelet transform.}
\label{filter_bank}
\end{figure}
A wavelet-based compression scheme aims to satisfactorily represent
an original discrete signal~$\mathbf{x}$ with as few DWT coefficients
as possible~\cite{Vetterli:2001,Chagas:00,Lu:99}.
One simple and effective way of doing that is to discard
the coefficients that, under certain criteria, are considered
insignificant.
Consequently, the signal reconstruction
is based on a reduced set of coefficients~\cite{Vetterli:2001,Unser1996}.
In the present work the classic scheme for non-linear compression
was used~\cite{Vetterli:2001}.
This procedure considers an \emph{a posteriori} adaptive set,
which keeps $M$
wavelet transform coefficients
that have the largest absolute values.
A hard thresholding was used to set the remaining coefficients to zero.
The number of coefficients $M$ to be retained was determined according
to the desired compression ratio $\CR$, which was defined by
\begin{equation}
\CR = \frac{N}{M},
\end{equation}
where $N$ and $M$ are the number of wavelet transform coefficients of
the original and the compressed signals, respectively.
\subsubsection{Measurement of Distortion}
To further the analysis, it is necessary to introduce
an error measure
to compare the original discrete signal~$\mathbf{x}$
with its reconstruction~$\tilde{\mathbf{x}}$.
Several measures that allow the
evaluation of the effect of compression schemes
have been suggested~\cite{Besar:00}.
However, one of the most commonly used is
the Percent Root-mean-square Difference
($\prd$)~\cite{Chagas:00,Besar:00,Lu:99},
which was utilized in the present study
as a measure of distortion
in the compression scheme.
The $\prd$ of two signals, $\mathbf{x}$ and $\tilde{\mathbf{x}}$,
both of length~$N$,
is defined by:
\begin{equation}
\prd(\mathbf{x},\tilde{\mathbf{x}})
=
\sqrt{\frac{\sum_{i=0}^{N-1} (x_i - \tilde{x}_i)^2 }{\sum_{i=0}^{N-1} x_i^2}}
\times
100 \%.
\end{equation}
\subsection{Choice of Parameters}
\subsubsection{Number of Scales}
\label{number_of_scales}
In order to select the number of scales $J_0 \in \{1, \ldots, J\}$
of the wavelet transform decomposition,
the following criterion was introduced:~$J_0$
was chosen so that the coarsest approximation
scale
had a pseudo-frequency close to the
\egg dominant frequency $f_c$
of 4--6 cycles per minute for the canine subjects~\cite{Mintchev:2000}
and 3~cycles per minute for the humans.
The pseudo-frequency $f_{\text{pseudo}}$ of a given scale~$j$ is
\begin{equation}
f_{\text{pseudo}} = \frac{f_\psi}{j\cdot T_s}
,
\qquad j=1,2,\ldots,J,
\end{equation}
where~$T_s$ is the sampling period (0.1 \second) and~$f_\psi$
is the center frequency of a wavelet
(the frequency that maximizes the magnitude of the Fourier transform of the wavelet)~\cite{MisiMisi00}.
Consequently,
a scale~$J_0$ was selected which minimized the difference
$(f_{\text{pseudo}} - f_c)$.
Table~\ref{pseudo} shows the number of decomposition levels
for some common wavelets.
\renewcommand{\multirowsetup}{\centering}
\newlength{\LL}
\settowidth{\LL}{Wavelet}
\begin{table}
\centering
\caption{Number of decomposition scales $J_0$ for some wavelets}
\label{pseudo}
\begin{tabular}{ccc}
\hline
\multirow{2}{\LL}{Wavelet} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{$J_0$} \\
\cline{2-3}
& Canine & Human \\
\hline
Haar & 7 & 8\\
Daubechies-2 & 6 & 7\\
Daubechies-3 & 7 & 7 \\
Coiflet-1 & 7 & 7 \\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\end{table}
\subsubsection{Compression Ratio}
\label{cr_section}
A compression ratio set $\CR \in \{3, 5, 7, 10 \}$
was selected and a matching procedure was carried out
aiming at optimizing the choice of wavelet.
\subsection{Optimization of the Wavelet Choice}
In the context of the present study,
a wavelet was sought that minimized
the $\prd$ between the original \egg signal and its reconstruction
for a given compression ratio.
However, the abundance of wavelets~\cite{Mallat:03}
makes such approach prohibitive.
As a result, some constraints on the choice of wavelet were introduced.
It is well known that wavelets can be generated from
discrete finite impulse response (FIR) filters~\cite{MisiMisi00}.
In the present work, the analysis was limited to
wavelets generated by FIR
filters with length no greater than six coefficients.
In this subset of wavelets one may find Haar, Daubechies-2, Daubechies-3, and Coiflet-1 wavelets,
to name the most popular ones~\cite{Mallat:03}.
This restriction is quite convenient, since all FIR filters of length up to six
that can be utilized to generate wavelets have simple parameterizations
of their coefficients~\cite{Zhou1993}.
For example, Pollen parameterization of 6-tap wavelet filters~\cite{Tew1992}
has two independent variables $(a,b)\in[-\pi,\pi]\times [-\pi,\pi]$.
Varying these two parameters,
a filter that generates a new wavelet can be defined.
Consequently, the Pollen parameterization defines a plane on which every
point is connected to a wavelet~\cite{Tew1992}.
Using the discussed compression scheme,
one can compute a~$\prd$ value for each wavelet
generated from a point with coordinates~$(a,b)$ on the
parameterization plane.
Doing so, a surface can be defined by the points~$(a,b,\prd)$.
Thus, the minima of this surface correspond to the
point coordinates~$(a,b)$ that generate a wavelet with good ``matching''
properties, since the $\prd$ values at these minima are small.
As a result, a set of point coordinates $(a_i, b_i)$
could be determined
on the parameterization plane, which minimizes the
$\prd$ for each \egg recording~$i$.
Fig.~\ref{prd-plane} shows typical surfaces
generated for basal canine and human \egg signals.
Taking the mean value of the minima,
the best wavelet parameterization $(a^\ast, b^\ast)$ could be defined.
Thus,
$(a^\ast,b^\ast)$
generates a wavelet that
on average
``matches'' best the normal \egg recordings.
\begin{figure*}
\centering
\subfigure[$\CR =3$]{\epsfig{file=dog-suf-cr3.eps,width=.45\linewidth}}
\subfigure[$\CR =10$]{\epsfig{file=dog-suf-cr10.eps,width=.45\linewidth}}
\subfigure[$\CR =3$]{\epsfig{file=vol-surf-cr3.eps,width=.45\linewidth}}
\subfigure[$\CR =10$]{\epsfig{file=vol-surf-cr10.eps,width=.45\linewidth}}
\caption{Plots generated after computing the $\prd$
surface for all possible wavelets on the parameterization plane,
using a canine \egg signal with $\CR=3$ (a), and $\CR=10$ (b).
A representative human \egg signal was used
to build $\prd$ surfaces with $\CR=3$ (c), and $\CR=10$ (d).
The minimum value is depicted by a circle ($\circ$).
The coordinate points
that correspond to Haar ($\ast$), Daubechies-2 ($\times$), Daubechies-3 ($\bullet$),
and
Coiflet-1 ($\triangle$) wavelets are shown.
The axes are normalized by~$\pi$.}
\label{prd-plane}
\end{figure*}
\section{Results}
\settowidth{\LL}{$\CR$}
\begin{table}
\caption{Optimal values of the parameterization}
\label{tab_results}
\begin{minipage}{\linewidth}
\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{ccccc}
\toprule
\multirow{2}{\LL}{$\CR$} &
\multicolumn{2}{c}{Canine\footnote{Based on 16 canine subjects.}} &
\multicolumn{2}{c}{Human\footnote{Based on 6 volunteers.}} \\
\cmidrule{2-5}
& $a^\ast$ & $b^\ast$ & $a^\ast$ & $b^\ast$ \\
\midrule
3 & 0.4329 & $-$0.2608 & 0.3976 & $-$0.2335 \\
5 & 0.4323 & $-$0.2638 & 0.4293 & $-$0.2550 \\
7 & 0.4323 & $-$0.2700 & 0.4276 & $-$0.2551 \\
10 & 0.4293 & $-$0.2736 & 0.4279 & $-$0.2600 \\
\bottomrule
\end{tabular}
\end{center}
\end{minipage}
\end{table}
The optimal values of the wavelet
parameterization were determined
for the selected compression ratios
(Table~\ref{tab_results}).
The values for compression ratio of~3 were associated
with
the wavelets depicted in Fig.~\ref{best_wavelet}.
It is worth mentioning that the proposed wavelets were
very similar to the classic Daubechies-3 wavelet.
The correlation coefficient between Daubechies-3 and
the optimal EGG wavelet was 0.996 and 0.965, for canine and human
signals respectively.
Since Daubechies-3 is
(i)~very similar to the proposed wavelet;
and
(ii)~easily available in many software packages
(e.g., {\sc Matlab} (The Mathworks, Inc., Natick, MA, USA)),
it can be chosen instead of the proposed wavelets.
Previous empirical findings~\cite{Ryu:02} confirm this observation.
\begin{figure}
\centering
\epsfig{file=optimal_wavelets.jpg.eps,width=0.8\linewidth}
\caption{Comparison between the obtained optimal wavelets
for canine (dotted curve) and human (solid bold curve) \egg signals
and
the standard Daubechies-3 wavelet (solid thin curve)
using the
optimal parameterization
for compression ratio of~3.
The similarity between Daubechies-3 and the optimal EGG wavelets is clearly evident.}
\label{best_wavelet}
\end{figure}
\section{Conclusion}
The problem of finding optimal wavelets to ``match''
\egg signals
was quantitatively addressed.
The proposed wavelets can be considered as tools to
further \egg signal analysis.
Moreover, the suggested methodology opens an avenue
towards the classification of
electrogastrograms based on the $\prd$ value of their wavelet compressed version,
either applying
the obtained optimal wavelets or the standard Daubechies-3.
\section*{Acknowledgments}
This work was partially supported by
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council
of Canada (NSERC) and the National Council for Scientific and
Technological Development (CNPq, Brazil).
{\small
\bibliographystyle{IEEEtran}
|
\section{Introduction}
Topological insulators (TIs) are materials that exhibit a spectral gap in the bulk
and at the same time have gapless excitations on their surface.
The most famous example of a TI is the quantum Hall effect, observed in two dimensional conductors subjected to
a perpendicular magnetic field at particular filling fractions\cite{Laughlin1981,Halperin1982}.
Recently, another type of TIs, symmetric under time reversal (TR) became a focus
of experimental and theoretical research \cite{Hasan2010, Qi2011}.
The experimental observation of these TR symmetric TIs has been reported in two
dimensional\cite{Konig2007,Konig2008,Park2015} and three dimensional materials\cite{Hsieh2008,Hsieh2009,Xia2009,Hsieh2009b,Zhang2009}.
For non-interacting fermionic TIs and topological superconductors (TSs), the full classification
based on their symmetry class and spatial dimension has been developed \cite{Kitaev2009,Schnyder2008,Shinsei2010}.
Among TIs, the simplest class of fermionic insulators invariant under time reversal $\mathcal{T}$ is the AII
(or symplectic) class, which is described by a $\mathbb{Z}_2$ topological invariant in 2+1 dimensions.
A topologically non-trivial state within this class possess a helical edge state \cite{Kane2005}.
For interacting systems the classification of TIs \cite{Ludwig2012,Levin2012},
as well as their microscopic description, is a subject of an active research.
A toy model construction belonging to this class is a system of two non-interacting
quantum Hall bars subjected to opposite magnetic fields, placed one on top of the other.
The ground state is then composed of two species of electrons with opposite spin polarizations.
As was pointed out in Ref \onlinecite{Levin2009}, in a properly tuned state an inclusion of
electron-electron interactions within each layer leads to two copies of fractional quantum Hall states
with opposite fillings. This induces the formation of a fractional TI (FTI) state\cite{Bernevig2006,Neupert2011,LSantos2011},
stable with respect to time reversal symmetric perturbations \cite{Levin2009}.
Although this model correctly captures the topological properties of the system, several
simplifying assumptions were made:
(a) The interactions between electrons in the different layers in the bulk was neglected,
but taken into account between the gapless edge modes.
(b) The spin-orbit interaction was assumed to be $S_z$ conserving and
was chosen to correspond to a constant spin-dependent \textquotedblleft magnetic field".
A convenient way of describing TIs and to account for interactions is the sliding Luttinger liquid (LL) approach \cite{Kane2002,Teo2014,Klinovaja2014c}.
Within this framework interactions between parallel Luttinger liquids are engineered to describe different nontrivial phases
in two dimensions. Despite its somewhat artificial appearance, the model
correctly captures the topological properties of different systems and correctly reproduces the
tenfold classification of noninteracting Hamiltonians \cite{Neupert2014}.
{\it Connection with previous works.-} Within the sliding LL approach, the construction of the integer and fractional TIs
was carried out in Ref. \onlinecite{Neupert2014} and in Ref. \onlinecite{Klinovaja2014b}. In Ref. \onlinecite{Neupert2014}
the authors construct the different classes of topological systems based on antiunitary symmetries. This was done without
stating any microscopic realization of the Hamiltonian that realizes the symmetries in question. In Ref.
\onlinecite{Klinovaja2014b} Klinovaja and Tserkovnyak suggest, for the first time in this context of sliding LL approach,
a Hamiltonian with spin orbit coupling that possesses TR symmetry.
In that work the following assumptions were made:
a) spin-orbit interaction was described by Rashba term, with the $S_z$ component only.
b) The interaction between the electrons was assumed to be sufficiently strong to stabilize the
desired fixed point, but was not analyzed explicitly.
In our work we use sliding LL approach, explicitly taking into account generic electron-electron
interaction terms consistent with TR symmetry in a model microscopic Hamiltonian.
We also allow for a spin-orbit interaction that acts on all the components
perpendicular to the wire direction ($z$ and $y$).
We analyze the stability of the FTI fixed point by deriving and explicitly solving the corresponding RG equations.
We use this model to obtain an effective Chern-Simon theory as the low energy description and show that it correctly
captures the low energy physics of Abelian FTI states. Although the connection between Chern-Simons theory and the edge modes
of topological systems is well known \cite{WenBook2004,Ludwig2012}, our work is the first that links
the sliding LL approach with a Chern-Simons low energy description.
This paper is organized as follows: In the first section we review the wire construction of fractional (Abelian) quantum
Hall states. We then extend the analysis to account for realistic Rashba and electron interactions.
In the second section, we study the relevance of the multi-particle hopping operators that drive the system into the
topological nontrivial state. We find that the interlayer interaction makes these operators
more relevant, in comparison with the toy model limit. This generic spin orbit interaction is limited by the condition
that it does not close the gap, which would lead to a transition to a different state, (e.g. through the appearance of a
nontrivial spin texture).
Finally, we discuss the emergence of the low energy description that follows from gauge invariance in the problem.
Integrating out the massive modes we show that the low energy model is indeed given by abelian Chern-Simons theory, as
expected for a FTI state.
\section{FTI from coupled quantum wires}\label{model}
\subsection{Laughlin states from Luttinger Liquids}\label{sec:FQHS}
In this section we briefly review the coupled wire construction developed in Refs \onlinecite{Kane2002,Teo2014}
for classifying topological states of two dimensional electrons.
This approach was recently applied for anomalous quantum Hall effect \cite{Klinovaja2015}, the Halperin states in the FQHE \cite{Sela2014}, and for the construction of non-Abelian states in FTIs
\cite{Vishwanath2014,Vaezi2014,Sagi2014,Klinovaja2014}.
We start with an array of parallel identical uncoupled wires separated by a distance $d$. In each wire we place the same
density $n_e=k^0/\pi d$ of spinless fermions with single particle dispersion $E(k)$. These fermions are subject to a
magnetic field perpendicular to the plane formed by the wires. We choose the gauge $\vec{A}=-By\hat{x}$ for the vector
potential. The magnetic field shifts the Fermi momentum in each wire by the amount $\delta k_{F,j}=bj$, with $b=|e|dB/\hbar$.
The linearized low energy Hamiltonian, around the Fermi momentum $k_{F,j}^\eta=\eta k^0+bj$ for each chirality
$(\eta=(R,L)=(+,-))$ is
\begin{equation}
\mathcal{H}_0=v_F^0\sum_{j,\eta}\int dx \eta\psi^{\dagger j}_\eta(-i\partial_x-k_{F,j}^\eta) \psi^j_\eta.
\end{equation}
Under bosonization \cite{GiamarchiBook2003,Coleman1975} (see \ref{app:bosonization}), this Hamiltonian becomes
\begin{equation}
\mathcal{H}_0=\frac{v^0_F}{2\pi}\sum_j\int dx [(\partial_x\theta^j)^2+(\partial_x\varphi^j)^2],
\end{equation}
\noindent where $\partial\theta_j/\pi$ and $\varphi_j$ are the density and phase fields at wire $j$ respectively.
Two body density interactions are described by the Hamiltonian
\begin{equation}
\mathcal{H}_{{\rm FS}}=\frac{v^0_F}{2\pi}\sum_{jk,\eta\eta'}\int dx\psi^{\dagger j}_\eta\psi^{j}_\eta V_{\eta\eta'}^{jk}\psi^{\dagger k}_{\eta'}\psi^{k}_{\eta'}.
\end{equation}
\noindent After bosonization, the sliding LL Hamiltonian $\mathcal{H}_{\rm SLL}=\mathcal{H}_0+\mathcal{H}_{{\rm FS}}$ takes the
general (still quadratic) form
\begin{equation}\label{H_sll}
\mathcal{H}_{\rm SLL}=\frac{v^0_F}{2\pi}\sum_{jk}\int dx (\partial_x{{\phi}_j})^TM_{jk}(\partial_x{\phi}_k),
\end{equation}
\noindent where ${\phi}^T_j=(\varphi_j\,,\,\theta_j)$. The $2\times2$ forward scattering matrix is
$M_{jk}=\mathbb{I}\delta_{ij}+\mathbb{V}_{jk}$, with $\mathbb{V}_{jk}$ parameterizing the forward scattering interactions.
At the filling fraction
\begin{equation}\label{filling_frac}
\nu\equiv2k^0/b=1/m,
\end{equation}
\noindent momentum conservation allows for the construction of an infinite set of inter-wire many-particle tunneling operators
without fast oscillating terms (Friedel oscillations).
Among these operators, the most relevant - in terms of renormalization group (RG) analysis - is of the form
\begin{equation}\label{tunneling_Laughlin}
\mathcal{O}_j=\exp[\varphi_j-\varphi_{j+1}+m(\theta_j+\theta_{j+1})],
\end{equation}
\noindent which hops electrons between wires $j$ and $j+1$. In presence of this tunneling term it is convenient
to define the so called link fields \cite{Teo2014}
\begin{eqnarray}\label{link_fields}
2\bar{\varphi}_{j+\frac{1}{2}}&\equiv&\varphi_j+\varphi_{j+1}+m(\theta_j-\theta_{j+1}),\\
2\bar{\theta}_{j+\frac{1}{2}}&\equiv&\varphi_j-\varphi_{j+1}+m(\theta_j+\theta_{j+1}).
\end{eqnarray}
\noindent Using the commutation relations between the density and phase fields (\ref{CR}) it's easy to see that the links fields
satisfy $[\partial_x\bar{\varphi}_{\ell}(x),\bar{\varphi}_{\ell'}(x')]=[\partial_x\bar{\theta}_{\ell}(x),\bar{\theta}_{\ell'}(x')]=0$
and
\begin{equation}
[\partial_x\bar{\theta}_{\ell}(x),\bar{\varphi}_{\ell'}(x')]=i\pi m\delta_{\ell\ell'}\delta(x-x').
\end{equation}
In the link fields basis, the Hamiltonian becomes
\begin{equation}
\mathcal{H}=\mathcal{H}_{SLL}+\sum_\ell\int dx g\cos(2\bar{\theta}_\ell).
\end{equation}
When the cosine term is relevant under RG analysis, it opens a gap in the spectrum. This operator can always be made
relevant by putting an appropriate choice of a forward scattering interaction.
In this state, the system possess an excitation gap and quasiparticles characterizing a Laughlin state at filling $\nu=1/m$.
\subsection{FTI for odd $m$ integers}
To construct the TI state we consider spin-orbit interaction in each wires.
The most general non interacting Hamiltonian on each wire $j$, quadratic in momentum including Rashba terms, confining potential and translational invariance
along the direction of the wire (Fig. \ref{fig:wires}) is
\begin{eqnarray}\label{Ham_Rashba}\nonumber
H_j&=&\frac{\hat{p}_x^2}{2m_e}+\alpha_{SO}(\vec{p}\times\vec{\sigma})\cdot\nabla V(y,z)+ V(y,z)\\
&=&\frac{\hat{p}_x^2}{2m_e}+(\lambda^z_j\sigma_z+\lambda^y_j\sigma_y)\hat{p}_x+V_j,
\end{eqnarray}
\begin{figure}
\includegraphics[width=0.8\columnwidth]{wires.pdf}
\caption{\label{fig:wires} Wire arrangement considered for the construction of fractional Hall states and
FTIs with time reversal. In the former case a constant magnetic field $B\hat{z}$ is assumed.
For the FTI construction, the presence of Rashba interaction and a special external confining potential is assumed
(see text).}
\end{figure}
\noindent where $m_e$ is the electron's effective mass, $\alpha_{SO}$ is the strength of the Rashba coupling and $V_j=V(jd,0)$ is
a spatially dependent confining potential at the position of each wire (here we assume that the plane formed by the wires is located
at $z=0$). The parameters $\lambda_j^{y,z}$ are simply
\begin{equation}
\lambda_j^y=\alpha_{SO}\frac{\partial V}{\partial z}\Big|_{\substack{y=jd\\z=0}},\quad \lambda_j^z=-\alpha_{SO}\frac{\partial V}{\partial y}\Big|_{\substack{y=jd\\z=0}}.
\end{equation}
The simplest potential $V$ that leads to the topological nontrivial phase corresponds
to a parabolic confining potential $V(y,z)=v_1y^2/2+v_2yz$. This potential generates a space dependent
Rashba coupling with strengths $\lambda_j^z=-(\alpha_{SO}v_1d)j$ and $\lambda_j^y=(\alpha_{SO}v_2d)j$
(compare with Ref. \onlinecite{Kane2005} and Eq. (3) in Ref. \onlinecite{Klinovaja2014b}).
The dispersion relation $E_j(k)$ for the Hamiltonian (\ref{Ham_Rashba}) is (with $\hbar=1$)
\begin{equation}
E_j(k)=\frac{k^2}{2m}+V_j\pm k\sqrt{(\lambda^z_j)^2+(\lambda^y_j)^2},
\end{equation}
The eigenstates of (\ref{Ham_Rashba}) are
\begin{eqnarray}
\psi_{j,+}(x)= e^{ikx}\left(
\begin{array}{c}
i\sin\alpha_{j}\\\label{eigenstate1}
\cos\alpha_{j}
\end{array}
\right),\\
\psi_{j,-}(x)=e^{ikx}\left(
\begin{array}{c}
\cos\alpha_{j}\\\label{eigenstate2}
-i\sin\alpha_{j}
\end{array}
\right)
\end{eqnarray}
\noindent with $\tan2\alpha_{j}=-\frac{\lambda^y_j}{\lambda^z_j}$. Due to the time reversal symmetry
of the Hamiltonian (\ref{Ham_Rashba}), $\mathcal{T}\psi_{j,s}$ is also an eigenstate with the same energy (Kramers partners).
Note that each Kramers pair is defined up to a phase. This signals the explicit the break of $SU(2)$ invariance (due to the spin-orbit
coupling) to a $U(1)\times U(1)$ symmetry.
To reach the topological phase (see also the discussion after eq. (\ref{mom_cons})), we tune the confining
potentials such that
\begin{equation}\label{confining}
v_1=\frac{\Lambda^2}{d^2m_e},\quad \mbox{and} \quad v_2=\frac{\Lambda}{d\alpha_{SO}}\sqrt{1-\left(\frac{\alpha_{SO}\Lambda}{dm_e}\right)^2}.
\end{equation}
The energy dispersion becomes in this case $E^{\pm}(k)=(k\pm j\Lambda)^2/2m_e$. In the case of a single quantum
wire, this energy dispersion can be obtained also by a combination of spin orbit and a Zeeman field. In such scenario
it has been shown \cite{Oreg2014a} that the system possess fractional quantized conductance and can host
Majorana bound states by proximity-coupling with a superconductor.
With the choice (\ref{confining}), the Fermi momentum in the wire $j$ becomes
\begin{equation}\label{Fermi_mom}
k^{\eta}_{F,s}(j)=\eta k^0-s\Lambda_j,
\end{equation}
\noindent where $\Lambda_j=j\Lambda$ and $\eta=(R,L)=(+,-)$ denotes chirality. In the previous formulas the values
of $\eta =R/L$ are understood as $\pm1$. The values of $s=(+,-)$ corresponds to the different spinors. For convenience
we will refer to electrons with $s=1$ $(-1)$ as those that belong to the upper (lower) layer.
This choice of potential results in a particularly simple
dependence of the Fermi momentum on the wire index. This will enable us
to construct relevant multi-particle tunneling operators that conserve momentum and are free of oscillations,
analogously to how it was done in the Section \ref{sec:FQHS}.
\begin{figure}
\includegraphics[width=1\columnwidth]{Parabolas2.pdf}
\caption{\label{fig:parabolas}Dispersion relations $E_j(k)$ for the different wires. Due to the Rashba term, the energies
of different eigenstates are displaced to opposite sides around zero momentum. The ever increasing Rashba terms induce a
different momentum shift for each wire. The arrows in the top of each parabola indicate the corresponding spin projection. Around the Fermi level,
tunneling processes are allowed (see main text) and they are represented by red (green) arrows for the $+$ ($-$) spin
states.}
\end{figure}
Using $\psi_{j,a}$ as a basis, we proceed to linearize the Hamiltonian (\ref{Ham_Rashba}) around the Fermi energy.
The linearized Hamiltonian is
\begin{eqnarray}\nonumber\label{Ham_Rashba_lin}
\mathcal{H}_0=v_F^0\sum_{j,s}\int dx\Big\{ \psi^{\dagger R}_{j,s}(-i\partial_x-k_{F,s}^R(j)) \psi^R_{j,s}\\
-\psi^{\dagger L}_{j,s}(-i\partial_x-k_{F,s}^L(j)) \psi^L_{j,s}\Big\}.
\end{eqnarray}
General density-density interactions between wires are given by
\begin{equation}
\mathcal{H}_{{\rm FS}}=\frac{v^0_F}{2\pi}\sum_{jk,\eta\eta',ss'}\int dx \rho_{j,s}^{\eta}(x)V_{\eta\eta',ss'}^{jk}\rho_{j',s'}^{\eta'}(x).
\end{equation}
\noindent where $\rho_{j,s}^{\eta}(x)= \psi^{\dagger \eta}_{j,s}\psi^{\eta}_{j,s}$ is the density of electrons
in the wire $j$, belonging to the layer $s$, moving in the direction $\eta=(R,L)$. Using the
standard bosonization rules described in the appendix (\ref{app:Bos_densities}) the bosonized Hamiltonian reads
\begin{equation}\label{Ham_micro}
\mathcal{H}=\mathcal{H}_0+\mathcal{H}_{FS}=\sum_{i,j}\int dx (\partial_x \vec{\phi}^i)^{T} M_{ij}(\partial_x \vec{\phi}^j),
\end{equation}
\noindent where $\vec{\phi}_j$ is the vector of bosonic fields at the position $j$, $\vec{\phi}^j=(\varphi^j_{+},\theta^j_{+},\varphi^j_{-},\theta^j_{-})^T$ that are associated with
fermions from the upper ($\psi^R_{j,+},\psi^L_{j,+}$) and the lower ($\psi^R_{j,-},\psi^L_{j,-}$) layers.
At this stage, the $U(1)\times U(1)$ symmetry, which appeared after the explicit break of $SU(2)$ by the
spin orbit term, becomes manifest under bosonization as the symmetry under a constant shift of the phase fields $\varphi(x)\rightarrow \varphi(x)+\beta$.
The most general quadratic Hamiltonian with nearest wires interactions has the following structure
\begin{equation}\label{model_micro}
M_{ij}=M_0\delta_{ij}+M_1\delta_{i,j+1}+M_1^\dagger\delta_{i+1,j}.
\end{equation}
In order to represent the Hamiltonian in terms of local link variables, cf. Eq. (\ref{link_fields}),
we choose the forward scattering matrix of the following form
\begin{eqnarray}\label{matrices}
M_0&=&U^\dagger M U+V^\dagger MV,\\
M_1&=&V^\dagger M U,
\end{eqnarray}
\noindent with $U$ and $V$ given by
\begin{eqnarray}\nonumber
U=\left(
\begin{array}{cccc}
1 & m & 0 & 0 \\
1 & m & 0 & 0 \\
0 & 0 & 1 & -m \\
0 & 0 & 1 & -m
\end{array}
\right), \quad
V=\left(
\begin{array}{cccc}
1 & -m & 0 & 0 \\
-1 & m & 0 & 0 \\
0 & 0 & 1 & m \\
0 & 0 & -1 & -m
\end{array}
\right).
\end{eqnarray}
For this special forward scattering matrix (\ref{model_micro}) the Hamiltonian
\begin{equation}
\mathcal{H}=\sum_{\ell}\int dx (\partial_x \boldsymbol{\bar{\phi}}_\ell)^{T} M(\partial_x \boldsymbol{\bar{\phi}}_\ell),
\end{equation}
is local in terms of the new fields $\boldsymbol{\bar{\phi}}_\ell=(\bar{\varphi}_{\ell,+},\bar{\theta}_{\ell,+},\bar{\varphi}_{\ell,-},\bar{\theta}_{\ell,-})^T$;
\begin{eqnarray}\label{link_fields_TI}
2\bar{\varphi}_{j+\frac{1}{2},s}&\equiv&\varphi^j_s+\varphi^{j+1}_s+s|m|(\theta_s^j-\theta_s^{j+1}),\\
2\bar{\theta}_{j+\frac{1}{2},s}&\equiv&\varphi^j_s-\varphi^{j+1}_s+s|m|(\theta_s^j+\theta_s^{j+1}).
\end{eqnarray}
Following Ref. \onlinecite{Teo2014} we name these bosonic degrees of freedom link fields (note that now they
have an extra layer index $s$). From the definition of the link fields and the commutation relations of the bosonic fields
$\theta$ and $\varphi$, defined in (\ref{CR}), we find the link fields' commutation relations
\begin{equation}
[\bar{\varphi}_{\ell,s}(x),\bar{\theta}_{\ell',s'}(x')]=i\pi s|m|{\rm sgn}(x-x')\delta_{s s'}\delta_{\ell \ell'}.
\end{equation}
The quasiparticle charge density and current on the link $\ell$ and layer $s$ are defined accordingly
\begin{eqnarray}\label{quasip_current}
j^0_{Q,\ell,s}&=&\rho_{Q,\ell,s}=\frac{s\partial_x\bar{\theta}_{\ell,s}}{\pi |m|}\quad\mbox{and}\\
j^1_{Q,\ell,s}&=&j^{x}_{Q,\ell,s}=\frac{-s\partial_\tau\bar{\theta}_{\ell,s}}{\pi |m|}.
\end{eqnarray}
Note that the link fields defined above transform under time reversal as
\begin{equation}\label{TRlinks}
\mathcal{T}\bar{\varphi}_{\ell,s}\mathcal{T}^{-1}=-\bar{\varphi}_{\ell,-s}+\frac{(1-s)\pi}{2},\quad \mathcal{T}\bar{\theta}_{\ell,s}\mathcal{T}^{-1}=-\bar{\theta}_{\ell,-s}
\end{equation}
The $U(1)\times U(1)$ symmetry of the original fermions becomes a symmetry under constant shifts in the links
phase field $\bar{\varphi}_{\ell,s}$. This is no longer the case when the symmetry is gauged. This leads to interesting
consequences for the low energy theory, described in the next sections.
Using (\ref{TRlinks}) one can show that the most general form of the forward scattering matrix $M$, consistent with time
reversal symmetry, is given by
\begin{equation}
M=\left(
\begin{array}{cccc}
\alpha_{\varphi\varphi} & \alpha_{\varphi\theta} & \alpha_{\varphi\bar{\varphi}} & \alpha_{\varphi\bar{\theta}} \\
\alpha_{\varphi\theta} & \alpha_{\theta\theta} & \alpha_{\varphi\bar{\theta}} & \alpha_{\theta\bar{\theta}} \\
\alpha_{\varphi\bar{\varphi}} & \alpha_{\varphi\bar{\theta}} & \alpha_{\varphi\varphi} & \alpha_{\varphi\theta} \\
\alpha_{\varphi\bar{\theta}} & \alpha_{\theta\bar{\theta}} & \alpha_{\varphi\theta} & \alpha_{\theta\theta}
\end{array}
\right)\,,
\end{equation}
\noindent being parametrized by six independent variables ($\alpha_{\varphi\varphi}$, $\alpha_{\varphi\theta}$, $\alpha_{\varphi\bar{\varphi}}$,
$\alpha_{\varphi\bar{\theta}}$, $\alpha_{\theta\bar{\theta}}$, $\alpha_{\theta\theta}$).
In terms of the link fields the Euclidean action is given by the sum of over all the link fields
\begin{equation}
S_0=\sum_\ell\int dxd\tau i(\partial_\tau \boldsymbol{\bar{\phi}}_\ell)^{T} K(\partial_x \boldsymbol{\bar{\phi}}_\ell)-\mathcal{H}\,.
\end{equation}
\noindent Here $K$ is the matrix
\begin{equation}
K= \frac{1}{2\pi |m|}\left(
\begin{array}{cc}
\sigma_x & 0 \\
0 & -\sigma_x
\end{array}
\right)\,.
\end{equation}
After integrating out the bosonic phase fields $\bar{\varphi}_{\ell,s}$, we are left with the action for the fields
$\bar{\theta}_{\ell,s}$ describing density fluctuation on the links. This action can be cast in a familiar form by
using the charge and spin fields
\begin{eqnarray}\label{ch_spin}
\Theta_{\ell,+}=\frac{\bar{\theta}_{\ell,+}+\bar{\theta}_{\ell,-}}{\sqrt{2}},\quad \Theta_{\ell,-}=\frac{\bar{\theta}_{\ell,+}-\bar{\theta}_{\ell,-}}{\sqrt{2}}.
\end{eqnarray}
In terms of $\Theta_{\ell,\pm}$ the action becomes (summation over $\alpha=+,-$ and links $\ell$ is implied)
\begin{eqnarray}\label{ac_ch_spin}\nonumber
S_0=\frac{1}{2\pi}\int dxd\tau\Big[\frac{u_\alpha}{K_\alpha}(\partial_x{\Theta}_{\ell,\alpha})^2+\frac{1}{K_\alpha u_\alpha}(\partial_\tau{\Theta}_{\ell,\alpha})^2\\
+ic((\partial_x{\Theta}_{\ell,+})(\partial_\tau{\Theta}_{\ell,-})+(\partial_\tau{\Theta}_{\ell,+})(\partial_x{\Theta}_{\ell,-}))\Big],
\end{eqnarray}
\noindent with Luttinger liquid parameters $K_\pm$ given by
\begin{equation}
\frac{1}{K_\pm}=m\sqrt{\frac{\alpha_{\theta\theta}\pm\alpha_{\theta\bar{\theta}}}{\alpha_{\varphi\varphi}\mp\alpha_{\varphi\bar{\varphi}}}-\frac{(\alpha_{\varphi\theta}\pm\alpha_{\varphi\bar{\theta}})^2}{\alpha_{\varphi\varphi}^2-\alpha_{\varphi\bar{\varphi}}^2}}.
\end{equation}
\noindent The velocities $u_\pm$ in terms of the interaction parameters become
\begin{equation}\nonumber
u_\pm=2\pi m\sqrt{(\alpha_{\varphi\varphi}\mp\alpha_{\varphi\bar{\varphi}})\left[\alpha_{\theta\theta}\pm\alpha_{\theta\bar{\theta}}-\frac{(\alpha_{\varphi\theta}\pm\alpha_{\varphi\bar{\theta}})^2}{\alpha_{\varphi\varphi}\pm\alpha_{\varphi\bar{\varphi}}}\right]},
\end{equation}
\noindent while the parameter $c$ (which explicitly breaks parity) reads
\begin{equation}
c=\frac{\left(\alpha _{\varphi \theta } \alpha _{\varphi \varphi }-\alpha _{\varphi \bar{\varphi}}
\alpha _{\varphi \bar{\theta}}\right)}{2\pi|m|(\alpha _{\varphi \varphi }^2-\alpha _{\varphi \bar{\varphi}}^2)}.
\end{equation}
The action (\ref{ac_ch_spin}) is self dual under $\rho\leftrightarrow\sigma$ and
resembles the action that appears in the context of spin ladders \cite{GogolinBook2004}.
\subsubsection{Tunneling operators}
So far we did not allow for electron tunneling between different wires.
To account for such processes we consider the multi-particle hopping operators
\begin{eqnarray}
{\mathcal{O}}_{j,a}^{\{s_{p,a}^R,s_{p,a}^L\}}=\prod_p(\psi_{j+p,a}^{R}(x))^{s^R_{p,a}}(\psi_{j+p,a}^{L}(x))^{s^L_{p,a}}.
\end{eqnarray}
Here we use the convention $\psi^{-1}=\psi^\dagger$. The possible choices of integers $s^R$ and $s^L$ are restricted by
charge conservation $\sum_p({s^R_{p,a}}+{s^L_{p,a}})=0$, and momentum conservation
\begin{flalign}
\sum_ps_{p,a}^Rk_{F,a}^R(j+p)+s_{p,a}^Lk_{F,a}^L(j+p)=0,
\end{flalign}
\noindent replacing the value of the Fermi momentum (\ref{Fermi_mom}) we have
\begin{flalign}\label{mom_cons}
k^0\sum_p(s_{p,a}^R-s_{p,a}^L)-a\sum_p\Lambda_{j+p}(s_{p,a}^R+s_{p,a}^L)=0.
\end{flalign}
The solution of this equation exists for all values of $j$ only if $\Lambda_j$ is linear in $j$.
This restricts us to the confining potentials given by Eq. (\ref{confining}).
Setting
\begin{equation}
\label{special_spin_orbit}
\Lambda_j=j\Lambda
\end{equation}
we rewrite Eq.(\ref{mom_cons}) as
\begin{equation}\label{condition}
\frac{ak^0}{\Lambda}=\frac{\sum_pp(s_{p,a}^R+s_{p,a}^L)}{\sum_p(s_{p,a}^R-s_{p,a}^L)},
\end{equation}
\noindent where we have used that $a=(+,-)$. As $s^R,s^L$ are integers, equation (\ref{condition}) has solutions
only when $\frac{ak^0}{\Lambda}$ is a rational number. The simplest FTI phase corresponds to
\begin{equation}
\label{rational}
\frac{ak^0}{\Lambda}=\frac{a}{2m}.
\end{equation}
\noindent This is similar to the condition (\ref{filling_frac}) in the construction of Laughlin states.
In that case, if the filling fraction matches $1/m$, the tunneling operators
(\ref{tunneling_Laughlin}) conserve the momentum and can be relevant. In analogy with the single layer
scenario, eq. (\ref{condition}) corresponds to the condition of an {\it effective} filling fraction $\nu_a=2ak^0/\Lambda$
in the layer $a$.
Any operator ${\mathcal{O}}_{j,a}^{\{s_{p,a}^R,s_{p,a}^L\}}$, with the set of parameters $\{s_{p,a}^R,s_{p,a}^L\}$,
satisfying Eq.(\ref{condition}) describes a legitimate multi-particle hopping.
The most relevant operator in the RG sense is given by
\begin{eqnarray}
s_{1,a}^R=-\frac{am-1}{2}\quad s_{1,a}^L=\frac{am+1}{2}\\
s_{0,a}^R=-\frac{am+1}{2}\quad s_{0,a}^L=\frac{am-1}{2}\\
s_{p,a}^{R/L}=0 \quad \mbox{for $p\neq 0,1$}
\end{eqnarray}
\noindent which are integers when $m=\Lambda/2k^0$ is an odd integer.
Upon bosonization, ${\mathcal{O}}_{j,a}^{\{s_{p,a}^R,s_{p,a}^L\}}$ in this case becomes
\begin{equation}\label{tunneling}
\mathcal{O}_{\ell,s}=\cos(2\bar{\theta}_{\ell,s}),
\end{equation}
\noindent where $\bar{\theta}_\ell$ is defined in Eq. (\ref{link_fields_TI}). The corresponding action
is given by
\begin{equation}\label{action_mass}
S=S_0+g\sum_\ell\int dxd\tau(\cos(2\bar{\theta}_{\ell,+})+\cos(2\bar{\theta}_{\ell,-}))\,.
\end{equation}
As we see, in the bosonic notation, the inclusion of tunneling operator leads to the sine-Gordon type action.
In the case when the cosine term is a relevant perturbation, a gap opens in excitation spectrum of the sliding LL
in the bulk. To study this question we realize an (RG) analysis of this operator.
\section{RG analysis, the bulk gap of FTI and edge modes}
\subsection{Relevance of tunneling operators}
The RG equations can be derived for this problem in the standard way \cite{GogolinBook2004}, and one finds
\begin{eqnarray}\label{RG_eqs}
\frac{dg}{dl}&=&(2-\Delta)g,\\
\frac{d}{dl}\left(\frac{u_\rho}{K_\rho}\right)&=&\frac{d}{dl}\left(\frac{u_\sigma}{K_\sigma}\right)=\frac{\Delta g^2f(x)}{u_\rho},\\\label{RG_eqs2}
\frac{d}{dl}\left(\frac{1}{u_\rho K_\rho}\right)&=&\frac{d}{dl}\left(\frac{1}{u_\sigma K_\sigma}\right)=\frac{\Delta g^2f(x)^3}{u_\rho^3}.
\end{eqnarray}
Here $x \equiv u_\rho/u_\sigma$ is the ratio of sound velocities in the charge and spin sector. The functions $f(x)$ and
$h(x)$ are
\begin{eqnarray}\label{f_function}
f(x)&=&\sqrt{h(x,c)+\sqrt{h(x,c)^2-x^2}},\\
h(x,c)&=&(1+x^2+|c|^2x)/2.
\end{eqnarray}
The scaling dimension of the tunneling operator $\mathcal{O}_{\ell,s}$ is given by
\begin{equation}
\Delta[\cos(2\bar{\theta}_{\ell,s})]=\frac{K_\rho+K_\sigma}{2\sqrt{1+\frac{|c|^2x}{(1+x)^2}}}.
\end{equation}
There is no renormalization of the parameter $c$ up to order $g^2$.
The set of equations (\ref{RG_eqs}-\ref{RG_eqs2}) can be linearized around the fixed point $(\Delta^0,g^0)=(2,0)$.
The fixed point $\Delta(K_\rho,K_\sigma,x)=2$ defines a region (in parameter space)
\begin{equation}\label{surface}
\left(\frac{K_\rho+K_\sigma}{4}\right)^2=1+\frac{|c|^2x}{(1+x)^2},
\end{equation}
\noindent for the LL parameters and velocities. Expanding around the point $\mathbf{p}^0=(K^0_\rho,K_\sigma^0,x^0)$
belonging to the surface defined in Eq. (\ref{surface}),
we define $\Delta\equiv 2+\lambda$ with $\lambda\ll1$ and $y\equiv g/u_\rho^*$ (see also appendix (\ref{sec:RG})).
The set of RG equations (valid in the vicinity of the fixed point), is given by
\begin{eqnarray}\label{RG_lineareqs}
\frac{dy}{dl}&=&-\lambda y,\\
\frac{d\lambda}{dl}&=&-\mathcal{C} y^2,\label{eq:RG_quadratic}
\end{eqnarray}
where the terms quadratic in $\lambda$ were neglected.
\noindent The parameter $\mathcal{C}=\mathcal{C}(K_\rho^0, K_\sigma^0,x^0)$ is an involved function of the point $\mathbf{p}^0=(K^0_\rho,K_\sigma^0,x^0)$
which belongs to the surface (\ref{surface}).
For $\mathcal{C}\leq 0$, the cosine term in Eq. (\ref{tunneling}) is never relevant and the system goes into the
weak coupling fixed point. In a generic situation $\mathcal{C}>0$ and the tunneling operators
become relevant for $\lambda<0$. This corresponds to a Berezinsky-Kosterlitz-Thouless (BKT) transition at $\Delta<2$ (see also (\ref{f_RG})).
\begin{figure}
\includegraphics[width=1\columnwidth]{BKT_trans.pdf}\caption{\label{fig:BKT} Renormalization flows for Eqs.
(\ref{RG_lineareqs}
and \ref{eq:RG_quadratic}). The different lines indicate the different
initial strengths of $g/u_{\rho}$. The thick dashed line represents
the separatrix of the BKT transition. When the initial $g/u_{\rho}$
is above $g^*/u_{\rho}$, the system flows to the strong coupling
regime (fractional topological phase), while for initial values below $g^*/u_{\rho}$,
the system flows to weak coupling regime (sliding LL). This plot is made for $c=0.1$.}
\end{figure}
As shown in Fig. \ref{fig:BKT}, this implies that the system
flows to strong coupling regimes if
\begin{equation}
\frac{K_\rho+K_\sigma}{2}<2\sqrt{1+\frac{|c|^2x}{(1+x)^2}}.
\end{equation}
For $c=0$, the theory becomes massive when the LL parameters $K_\rho+K_\sigma<4$. For generic interactions
(preserving time reversal symmetry), $c\neq0$ and the region where the Luttinger parameters flow to strong coupling
is enhanced as shown in Fig \ref{fig:separatrix}. In this sense, generic time reversal symmetric interactions help
driving the system into the topological phase.
\begin{figure}
(a)
\includegraphics[width=1\columnwidth]{c_BKT.pdf}
(b)
\includegraphics[width=1\columnwidth]{Slope.pdf}
\caption{\label{fig:separatrix} Various separatrix lines with various interaction
strengths c. (a) For a generic electron interaction (finite $c$) the critical point $\Delta$ shifts
to the right with increasing $c$. (b) The slope of the
separatrix lines decreases as a function of $c$, that means that the region where the system flows to strong coupling (i.e the topological phase)
is enlarged.}
\end{figure}
From now on, we assume that the system is in the massive phase. Our RG eqs. show that the cosine term in Eq. (\ref{tunneling})
is relevant and a gap in the spectrum of sliding LL opens (this was just assumed in Ref. \onlinecite{Klinovaja2014b}).
For periodic boundary conditions, the gap opens everywhere, as the field $\phi_s^N=\varphi_s^N-s|m|\theta_s^N$ in the wire
$N$ pairs up with the field $\phi_s^0=\varphi_s^0+s|m|\theta_s^0$ in the first wire to form the link fields, all of which
develop a gap after the cosine term becomes RG relevant (see eq. (\ref{link_fields_TI})).
\subsection{Edge modes}
Experimentally however, a two dimensional finite size sample is modeled by open boundary conditions. In this case
note that the first and last fields (with different \textquotedblleft layer" components)
\begin{eqnarray}\label{edgemodes}
\phi^s_0&\equiv&\varphi_s^0+s|m|\theta_s^0,\\
\phi^s_N&\equiv&\varphi_s^N-s|m|\theta_s^N,
\end{eqnarray}
\noindent had no cosine term and therefore remain ungapped.
These fields at the boundary correspond to the gapless edge modes of a TI.
The same conclusion has been reached in Ref. \onlinecite{Klinovaja2014b}.
At each edge we have two counter propagating edge modes, labeled by $s=(+,-)$.
The dynamics for these edge modes is described by the Hamiltonian
\begin{equation}\label{edge_ham}
H_{\rm edge}=\frac{|m|v_F}{4\pi}\sum_{s=+,-}\int dx(\partial_x\phi^s_0)^2 +(\partial_x\phi^s_N)^2.
\end{equation}
These helical edge modes are the hallmark of the topologically nontrivial phase. We will see in the next section that the phase that we encountered here is described in the long wavelength limit by a Chern-Simons theory, which makes the topological properties more evident.
Different boundary conditions can be implemented using different arrangements of wires. In order to reproduce chiral states
appearing in the edge of a disk, an array of concentric wires can be used, as discussed in the appendix \ref{app:CW}.
Few comments are in order here.
First, we note that our analysis is valid only for special filling fractions, formally described by Eq. (\ref{condition}).
Moreover it is limited by the special type of spin-orbit interaction in Eq. (\ref{special_spin_orbit}), and the confining
potential in Eq. (\ref{confining}).
As we are about to see, in this case the system has topological order.
Although we do not address the stability of this point, we expect that static disorder stabilizes
the topological phase, making it robust against small deviations on the filling factor and generic spin-orbit interactions.
Our analysis is limited to the Laughlin states with an {\it effective} filling factor $\nu=\pm1/m$ , $m$ being an odd integer.
A heedful reader could ask, what does prohibit us from repeating this procedure for even values of $m$.
While formal steps of construction remain valid, the result is not the true ground state.
As we know from the context of fractional quantum Hall effect \cite{WenBook2004}
the true ground state for these filling is highly sensitive to the fine interaction details,
and thus requires special consideration, that is beyond the current work.
We now show how our approach can be connected with a more conventional Chern-Simons theory.
\section{Low energy description and Chern-Simons term}
Until now, we have considered the dynamics of fermionic excitations in the system. We will now discuss the
electromagnetic response of the system and the effective low energy description of the FTI state.
As expected for the TI case, the resulting theory indeed has a topologically non-trivial Chern-Simons term.
To find out the electromagnetic response, one needs to compute the effective action $I$ as follows,
\begin{equation}
\exp(-I[A])=\int\mathcal{D}{\psi}\mathcal{D}\bar{\psi}e^{-S[\psi,\bar{\psi},A]}.
\end{equation}
\noindent Here $S$ is the fermionic action in the presence of an external gauge field $A$.
The coupling of the gauge field to the fermionic action in its bosonic form in Eq. (\ref{action_mass})
should be gauge invariant. We proceed to investigate the gauge invariance of $S$ below.
\begin{subsection}{Gauge invariance}
\end{subsection}
Let's recall the gauge transformation laws for the gauge field $A_\mu$ and original fermions $\psi_j(x,\tau)$.
Due to charge conservation, the phase of electron operators can be redefined $\psi'(x,\tau)=e^{i\alpha}\psi(x,\tau)$, without
changing the action. This $U(1)$ freedom can be {\it gauged} by making the phase $\alpha$ (initially a constant) a function
of space-time. Of course, this change alone does not preserve the fermionic action. To make the action invariant again
it is necessary to include a gauge field with transformation laws that cancel the extra contribution
from the space-time dependent phase. We have then the following gauge transformations
\begin{eqnarray}\label{GTfermion}
[\psi_j(x,\tau)]^G&=&e^{i\alpha_j(x,\tau)}\psi_j(x,\tau),\\\nonumber
[A_{\mu,j}(x,\tau)]^G&=&A_{\mu,j}(x,\tau)-\partial_\mu\alpha_j(x,\tau).
\end{eqnarray}
It is easy to check that these transformations leave invariant the free electron action
coupled to an external gauge field
\begin{eqnarray}
S_{\rm free}[\psi,A]=\int d^2x\bar{\psi}(i\partial_\mu\gamma^\mu-A_\mu\gamma^\mu)\psi,
\end{eqnarray}
\noindent i.e. $S_{\rm free}[\psi^G,A^G]=S_{\rm free}[\psi,A]$, (here $\bar{\psi}=\psi^\dagger\gamma^0$ and $\gamma^{0,1}$
are the Dirac matrices defined in (\ref{ap:TR})).
Bosonizing the electron (see (\ref{app:bosonization})), we can read off the gauge transformation rules for the phase
$\varphi$ and density field $\theta$
\begin{eqnarray}
[\varphi^j_s(x,\tau)]^G&=&\varphi^j_s(x,\tau)+\alpha_j(x,\tau),\\\nonumber
[\theta^j_s(x,\tau)]^G&=&\theta^j_s(x,\tau).
\end{eqnarray}
The link fields in Eq. (\ref{link_fields_TI}), that appear as the natural basis after the inclusion of the tunneling operators (\ref{tunneling}),
change non trivially under a gauge transformations
\begin{eqnarray}\nonumber
[\bar{\varphi}_{j+\frac{1}{2},s}(x,\tau)]^G&=&\bar{\varphi}_{j+\frac{1}{2},s}(x,\tau)+\frac{\alpha_j(x,\tau)+\alpha_{j+1}(x,\tau)}{2},\\\nonumber
[\bar{\theta}_{j+\frac{1}{2},s}(x,\tau)]^G&=&\bar{\theta}_{j+\frac{1}{2},s}(x,\tau)+\frac{\alpha_j(x,\tau)-\alpha_{j+1}(x,\tau)}{2}.
\end{eqnarray}
\noindent Note in particular that $\bar{\theta}_{j+\frac{1}{2},s}$ transforms as a gauge field with $\alpha_j-\alpha_{j+1}$
the discretized version of the derivative along $y$.
The gauge field parallel to the links, along with the temporal component (scalar potential) couples to the action
via the current and density operators. After bosonization the part of the action that couples the gauge field to the
quasiparticles is explicitly
\begin{equation}\label{electric_f}
S_A=\sum_{\ell,s,}\int d^2xj_{\ell,s}^\mu A_{\mu}=\sum_{\ell,s}s\int d^2x \frac{\partial_\nu\bar{\theta}_{\ell,s}}{|m|\pi}\epsilon^{\mu\nu} A_{\parallel\mu},
\end{equation}
\noindent where $j_{\ell,s}^\mu $ is the quasiparticle density ($\mu=0$) and current ($\mu=1$), defined in
(\ref{quasip_current}); $\epsilon^{\mu\nu}$ is the two dimensional Levi Civita antisymmetric tensor, with $\epsilon^{01}=1$
and summation over repeated indices is assumed. The gauge field along the wires is $A_\parallel=(A_0(\tau,x),A_1(\tau,x))$
($\mu=(0,1)=(\tau,x)$ in (\ref{electric_f})).
The last term in Eq. (\ref{electric_f}) can be integrated by parts, and ensures that the action is gauge invariant with respect
to the temporal and the $x$-component of the gauge
field. The gauge field $A^{\perp}=A_2$ which is perpendicular to the wires induces an Aharonov-Bohm phase in
the inter-wire tunneling operator $\mathcal{O}_\ell$ defined in Eq. (\ref{tunneling}).
Indeed, the tunneling operator for the $s=+$ (upper layer) fields in terms of the original fermions is given by
\begin{equation}
\mathcal{O}_{\ell,+}=(\psi_{j+1,+}^{L\dagger})^{\frac{m+1}{2}}(\psi_{j+1,+}^{R})^{\frac{m-1}{2}}(\psi_{j,+}^{L\dagger})^{\frac{m-1}{2}}(\psi_{j,+}^{R})^{\frac{m+1}{2}}\,,
\end{equation}
and similarly for the lower layer (with $m$ replaced by $-m$). Under the gauge transformations (\ref{GTfermion})
the tunneling term $\mathcal{O}_\ell$ changes as
\begin{equation}\label{GTO}
[\mathcal{O}_{j+\frac{1}{2},s}]^G=\mathcal{O}_{j+\frac{1}{2},s} e^{i(\alpha_j-\alpha_{j+1})}
\end{equation}
In order to maintain gauge invariance, the operator $\mathcal{O}_{\ell,s}$ should be modified, introducing a
{\it Wilson line} $W_{j,j+1}$
\begin{equation}
W_{j,j+1}=\exp\left(-i\int_{j}^{j+1}A_{y,j} dy\right),
\end{equation}
\noindent such that the tunneling operator $\mathcal{O}_{\ell,s}$ becomes
\begin{equation}\label{M_tunn}
\mathcal{O}_{j+\frac{1}{2},s}\rightarrow \mathcal{O}_{j+\frac{1}{2},s}W_{j,j+1}.
\end{equation}
It is clear that this combination is invariant under a gauge transformation, as the
phase acquired by $\mathcal{O}$ is exactly canceled by the transformation of $W$
\begin{eqnarray}
[W_{j,j+1}]^G&=&\exp\left(-i\int_{j}^{j+1}[A_{y,j}]^G dy\right),\\\nonumber
&=&\exp\left(-i\int_{j}^{j+1}(A_{y,j}-\partial_y\alpha_j)dy\right),\\\nonumber
&=&W_{j,j+1}e^{-i(\alpha_j-\alpha_{j+1})}.
\end{eqnarray}
The bosonized action (including the modified tunneling term (\ref{M_tunn})) becomes
\begin{eqnarray}\nonumber\label{cos_action}
S[A]&=&S_0+\sum_{\ell,s}\int d^2x g\cos(2(\bar{\theta}_{\ell,s}+A_\ell^{\perp}d/2))\\
&-&\sum_{\ell,s}\int d^2x\frac{\bar{\theta}_{\ell,s}}{|m|\pi}\epsilon^{\mu\nu}\partial_\mu A_{\parallel\nu}.
\end{eqnarray}
\noindent This action is gauge invariant (here $A^\perp_\ell=A_{y,j}$ and we have used that $\int A_y dy=A_yd$, where $d$ is the
distance between wires which is assumed smaller than any other length scale).
When the cosine term becomes relevant, the field $\bar{\theta}_\ell$ is pinned to the minimum of the potential, i.e
$\bar{\theta}_\ell=-A_\ell^\perp d/2$. The action acquires a term proportional to the chiral anomaly in each
effective layer $(+,-)$, and this anomaly dominates the dynamics of the system after the massive modes ($\theta$ fields)
have been integrated out \cite{Mulligan2011}.
In this case the effective action for the upper layer becomes (using $\Delta y=d$)
\begin{equation}\label{CS_discrete}
I^+[A]=\frac{1}{2\pi|m|}\sum_\ell\Delta y\int d^2x\epsilon^{\mu\nu}A^{\perp}_\ell\partial_\mu A_{\parallel\nu}+\dots.
\end{equation}
\noindent where $\dots$ denote terms containing higher derivatives, that do not contribute to the small momentum
behavior. Here we recognize the discretized version of (see Eq. (\ref{app:CS}) for more details)
\begin{equation}\label{ch_anomalies}
I^+[A]=\frac{1}{4\pi|m|}\int d^3x\epsilon^{\mu\nu\rho}A_\mu\partial_\nu A_{\rho}\,,
\end{equation}
that is the Chern-Simons theory for the fractional quantum Hall effect with filling fraction $\nu=1/m$.
The effective action $I^+$ accounts for the low energy dynamics of the system,
describing the electromagnetic response with respect to the gauge field $A_\mu$ in the upper layer
(similar construction can be done for the lower layer separately).
Taking the functional derivative respect to the gauge field $A_\mu$, one expectedly reproduces the Hall conductance
\begin{equation}\label{eq_mov}
\frac{\delta I^+[A]}{\delta A_\mu}\equiv J_+^\mu=\frac{1}{2\pi|m|}\epsilon^{\mu\nu\rho}\partial_\nu A_\rho,
\end{equation}
\noindent where $J_+^\mu$ denotes the electron current in the upper layer. For
the lower layer we have similarly
\begin{equation}
I^-[A]=\frac{-1}{4\pi|m|}\int d^3x\epsilon^{\mu\nu\rho}A_\mu\partial_\nu A_{\rho}\,.
\end{equation}
To satisfy (identically)
the conservation equation $\partial_\mu J^\mu=0$,
it is customary \cite{WenBook2004} to define the bosonic $b^+_\mu$ field by $J^\mu=\frac{1}{2\pi}\epsilon^{\mu\nu\rho}\partial_\nu b_\rho^+$
(note that these auxiliary bosonic fields $b_\mu$ are essentially the full gauge invariant version of
$\epsilon^{\mu\nu}\partial_\nu\bar{\theta}_\ell$).
The field theory in terms of $b^+_\mu$ that reproduces (\ref{eq_mov}) is then \cite{Lopez1991}
\begin{align}\label{eff_action}\nonumber
\mathcal{L}_{{\rm b}}[b^{\pm},A]=-\frac{|m|}{4\pi}\epsilon^{\mu\nu\rho}(b^{+}_\mu\partial_\nu b^{+}_\rho-b^{-}_\mu\partial_\nu b^{-}_\rho)\\
-\frac{1}{2\pi}\epsilon^{\mu\nu\rho}A_\mu(\partial_{\nu}b_\rho^{+} +\partial_{\nu}b_\rho^{-}).
\end{align}
\noindent where we have included the contribution from both layers. Note that the theory (\ref{eff_action}) can be
cast in the form of the BF theory \cite{Cho2011,Chan2013}, by defining the fields $a_\mu=b_\mu^++b_\mu^-$ and $b_\mu=b_\mu^+-b_\mu^-$.
This double Abelian Chern-Simons theory $U(1)_m\times \overline{U(1)}_m$ accounts for the ground state
degeneracy $m^g$ of the system if placed on a genus $g$ surface. This theory also describes the exchange statistics of
quasiparticle excitations \cite{WenBook2004,FradkinBook2013,Freedman2004}.
\section{Summary and Outlook}\label{conclusions}
Starting from an array of parallel LLs with Rashba type spin-orbit interaction,
we have constructed a FTI.
The magnitude of spin-orbit interaction depends on the position of the wire and mimics
the magnetic field in the quantum Hall effect. The interaction between electrons is restricted to
nearest and the next nearest wire, but includes all terms consistent with $\mathcal{T}$ symmetry.
We have derived and analyzed the RG equations for the multi-particle tunneling operators and showed
that there exist a window in the parameter space where these operators are relevant, and FTI is a stable fixed point.
Due to the large number of possible interaction constants the precise position of
this window can be determined only numerically.
We have analyzed the stability of the FTI fixed point in relation to a different interaction constants.
Remarkably, the stability is enhanced by inclusion the repulsive interaction between electron with opposite spin.
To establish the connection with other methods, we have derived an effective low energy theory for our model.
The resulting fixed point of our construction is captured by a double Chern-Simons theory with correct counting of topological ground state degeneracy and exchange of quasi-particle excitations, and agrees with one
suggested in Ref.\onlinecite{Levin2009} within a more restrictive model.
Before ending the paper, we list some of the questions that remain open:
a) The stability of the FTI against perturbations that break TR symmetry.
Though a strong perturbation of this kind certainly destroys the FTI state,
the topological protection may hold against "weak" perturbations.
For the magnetic impurities located solely on the edge, the BKT transition between TI and trivial insulator
was found\cite{Beri2012}. The case of magnetic impurities added in the bulk remains to be studied.
b) Within the sliding LL approach the tunneling operators are chosen for the
states exactly at fractional (or integer) fillings. In the presence of TR preserving disorder
one expects the state to form a plateau.
The emergence of plateaus yet remains to be shown within sliding LL approach.
While for non-interacting case the formation of plateaus and the transition between different filling is described
within $\sigma$-model approach\cite{Pruisken1988},
the current formalism provides a natural framework in the presence of interactions.
\medskip
\textbf{Acknowledgments}
We thank S.T. Carr, E. Berg, F. D. M. Haldane, A. D. Mirlin, I.V. Protopopov, and A. Stern for the useful discussions.
The authors are specially indebted to Eran Sela for very illuminating discussions.
This work was supported by grant GIF 1167-165.14/2011, ISF and DFG grant RO 2247/8-1.
|
\section{Introduction}
The presence of the cosmological constant can affect the quantum kinematics of gravity. Here we show that it enters naturally in loop quantum gravity (LQG) by determining the size of a compact phase space and the dimension of the corresponding finite dimensional Hilbert space. This yields the discretization of the extrinsic curvature and can be related to time discreetness.
Recent results indicate that a positive cosmological constant simplifies, rather than complicating, our understanding of quantum gravity. Fairbairn and Meusburger \cite{Fairbairn:2010cp} and Han \cite{Han:2010pz,Han:2011aa,Han:2013tap}, building on \cite{Rovelli1993,Smolin95} and \cite{Noui:2002ag}, have shown that the cosmological constant makes covariant LQG finite. Haggard, Han, Kami\'nski and Riello \cite{Haggard} have given a straightforward construction of the LQG dynamics in the presence of the cosmological constant, related to the geometry of constant curvature triangulations, a key idea introduced by Bahr and Dittrich \cite{Bahr:2009qd}, which grounds the present work. The LQG kinematics needs to be modified to take into account the presence of a cosmological constant; this was realised long ago by Borissov, Major and Smolin \cite{Borissov:1995cn,Major:1995yz,Major:2007nd} and the problem has been recently explored in detail by Dupius, Girelli, Livine and Bonzom \cite{Dupuis2013,Dupuis2014,Bonzom2014,Bonzom2014a} for negative cosmological constant.
A discretization of spacetime in terms of flat simplices is not suitable for a theory with cosmological constant because flat geometry solves the field equations only with vanishing cosmological constant. This problem can be solved choosing a discretization with simplices with constant curvature. Here we show with a positive cosmological constant, a constant curvature discretization leads to a modification of the LQG phase space. The phase space turns out to be \emph{compact} for each link. The conventional LQG phase space is modified by curving the conjugate momentum space. Curved momentum space has been repeatedly considered in quantum gravity, for instance in the relative locality framework \cite{AmelinoCamelia:2011bm}. Here it is not the momentum space of a particle to be curved, but rather the space of the conjugate momentum of the gravitational field itself. We study the quantization of the resulting phase space, and we write explicitly modified quantum geometrical operators. We show that these are related to a $q$ deformation of $SU(2)$. A $q$ deformations has been derived in LQG as a way to implement the dynamics of the theory with cosmological constant in \cite{Noui2011,Pranzetti2014}. Here we have shown that it is also directly implied by the constant curvature of the individual simplices, and we have given the corresponding form of the geometrical operators of the gravitational theory, in the presence of a cosmological constant.
This result has physical consequences: it is not just the intrinsic geometry, but also the extrinsic geometry to be discrete in quantum gravity (for a hint of this see \cite{Rovelli2013d}). This indicates that not just space, but also proper time, is predicted to be discrete in the theory.
We study the quantization of the geometry in 2+1 Euclidean dimensions with positive cosmological constant, that results from building on constant curvature triangulations, but the results that we obtain may be relevant for the physical 3+1 Lorentzian case.
\section{Constant curvature geometry}
We start with the geometry of a constant curvature triangle. For this, it is convenient to fix units where the constant curvature has unit value. The small-curvature limit is then the limit where the triangle is small. Consider therefore a metric sphere with unit radius $R=1$. A constant curvature triangle has three vertices on this sphere. It is a portion of the sphere bounded by three arcs of maximal circles joining two vertices. The geometry of the triangle is determined, up to isometries, by giving the length $L_l, l=1,2,3$, of these three (oriented) arcs. Importantly, these lengths are bounded.
Since the radius of the sphere determines a unit of length, these lengths can be given a-dimensionally: they are determined by the three angles $\alpha_l=L_l/R$ they define at the center of the sphere. There is also an elements $k_l$ of $SO(3)$ associated which each arc. This is simply the rotation by an angle $\alpha_l$ around the axis normal to the plane of the great circle of the arc. The intrinsic geometry of the triangle can therefore be given by associating (non independent) $SO(3)$ elements $k_l$ to each of its sides.
Consider a two-dimensional surface $\Sigma$ immersed in a three dimensional Riemannian manifold. This surface inherits an intrinsic and an extrinsic geometry from the 3d manifold. Fix a 3d triangulation of the 3d manifold, inducing a 2d triangulation on $\Sigma$. The holonomy of the 3d spin connection along each side $l$ of the triangulation is an element $h_l$ of $SO(3)$. The index $l$ runs over all the segments (arcs) of the triangulation. We choose to approximate the intrinsic geometry of each 3-cell with a constant curvature metric, and therefore the geometry of each triangle with a triangle of uniform curvature. The the full intrinsic and extrinsic geometry of $\Sigma$ is defined by a couple of $SO(3)$ elements, $(k_l,h_l)$, associated to each arc: $h_l$ is the holonomy of the 3d connection, $k_l$ is the rotation associated to the curved arc $l$.
It is customary in loop quantum gravity (LQG) to consider the trivalent graph dual to the triangulation. In two space dimension, each link $l$ of the graph corresponds to an arc $l$ of the triangulation. The geometrical data are therefore an element $(k_l,h_l)$, in $SO(3)\times SO(3)$ for each link $l$ of the graph.
In the limit in which the triangles are small compared to the constant curvature scale, the group elements $k_l$ are near the identity and we can approximate them as $k_l=e^{\vec J_l\cdot \vec\tau}\sim 1\!\!1 + J_l= 1+ \vec J_l\cdot \vec\tau$, where $\vec\tau$ is a basis in the $so(3)\sim su(2)$ algebra. In this limit, which we call $R\to\infty$, the geometry of the surface is approximated by an element of the group, $h_l$, and an element of the algebra, $\vec J_l$, for each arc $l$. These are the standard geometrical data of LQG. Let us shift from $SO(3)$ to $SU(2)$ as is conventionally done in LQG. We write the limit in the form
\begin{eqnarray}
SU(2) \times SU(2)
&\underset{R\to\infty}{\to}
& su(2)\times SU(2)=T^*SU(2) \nonumber\\\nonumber
(k,h) &\underset{R\to\infty}{\mapsto}
& (J,h)
\end{eqnarray}
Thus, what we do here is to modify the usual LQG kinematics by replacing the algebra with the group. The role of $SU(2)\times SU(2)$ in Euclidean 3d gravity with positive cosmological constant has been pointed out by Meusburger and Schroers in \cite{Meusburger2003,Meusburger2008}, as the local isometry group, or as the gauge group of the Chern-Simon formulation of the theory.
\section{Compact phase spaces}
The key difference between the algebra and the group is that the second is compact. This has significative consequences in the quantum theory. Their importance for finiteness has been pointed out in \cite{Nozari2014}. These are the consequences we explore here.
A compact phase space is the classical limit of a quantum system with a finite dimensional Hilbert space. This can be seen in many ways; the simplest is to notice that a compact phase space has a finite (Liouville) volume, and therefore can accommodate a finite number of Planck size cells, and therefore a finite number of orthogonal quantum states. The familiar example of quantum systems with finite dimensional Hilbert space is given by angular momentum, for systems with fixed total angular momentum, where the quantum state space is the Hilbert space ${\cal H}_j$ that carries the spin-$j$ representation of $SU(2)$.
In standard LQG, the kinematical data are given by an element of $\Gamma\equiv su(2)\times SU(2)$ on each link. $\Gamma$ is the phase space of the theory, for each link. Since it is a a cotangent space, it carries a natural symplectic structure. The corresponding quantization defines the quantum theory of gravity in the loop representation. This is defined on the Hilbert space $L_2[SU(2)]$, where the group elements act multiplicatively and the algebra elements act as left invariant vector fields. Here we want to modify this structure by replacing the algebra $su(2)$ with the group $SU(2)$. The problem we address is therefore to determine the phase space structure of $SU(2)\times SU(2)$ and its quantization.
As a preliminary exercise, we address this problem for the simplified case of $U(1)\times U(1)$.
\section{$\mathbf{U(1)\times U(1)}$}
Here we define and quantize the phase space $U(1)\times U(1)$. We write elements of this space as a couple $(h,k)$ of complex numbers with unit norms, with $(h=e^{i\alpha},k=e^{i\beta})$. Let us start by determining the phase space structure, namely writing the symplectic two-form. We are guided to do so by the fact that in the limit in which the radius of one of the two circles can be considered large we want to recover the symplectic form of the cotangent space, which is
\begin{equation}
\omega=d\alpha \wedge d\beta.
\end{equation}
This indicates immediately what we need:
\begin{equation}
\omega=-h^{-1}dh \wedge k^{-1} dk.
\end{equation}
which locally is just the same as the previous one. The corresponding Poisson brackets are easily computed:
\begin{equation}
\{k,h\}=hk.
\end{equation}
This defines the phase space. Let us look for a corresponding quantum theory. For this, we want a Hilbert space $\cal H$ and operators $h$ and $k$ with an operator algebra that reduces to the above Poisson algebra in the appropriate limit. The problem is easy to solve.
The Hilbert space is the \emph{finite dimensional} Hilbert space $\cal H$ with a discrete basis $|n\rangle$ where $n=1,...,N=\dim {\cal H}$, and the operators act as follow
\begin{equation}
k|n\rangle =e^{i\frac{2\pi}N n}|n\rangle
\end{equation}
and
\begin{equation}
h|n\rangle = |n+1\rangle
\end{equation}
cyclically (that is $ k|N\rangle = |1\rangle$). A straightforward calculation gives their commutator algebra
\begin{equation}
[h,k]= \left(e^{i\frac{2\pi}N}-1\right) hk.
\end{equation}
which gives a representation of the Poisson algebra for large $N$. In this limit, the Planck constant (determined by $[\hat a,\hat b]=i\hbar \widehat{\{a,b\}}$) is related to $N$ by
\begin{equation}
\hbar = \frac{2\pi}N.
\end{equation}
To understand the physics, recall that we have a preferred length here: the constant curvature radius, which we have set to unit. Therefore the dimensionless quantity $\frac{2\pi}N$ is actually the ratio between two dimensionfull quantities: in the physical theory it is the ratio of the Planck length scale to the cosmological constant scale.
The physics of the quantum theory of this simple example is intriguing. Since the phase space is compact, the Hilbert space is finite dimensional and therefore \emph{both} $h$ and $k$ have discrete spectrum. This is like having a particle on a circle, and therefore discrete momentum, but also the circle being actually discrete, and therefore discrete position. Discreteness of the position gives a maximum momentum. So, all physical quantities are discrete, bounded and therefore completely finite.
This is appealing. The mathematics of the continuum is just a useful approximation to a physical reality which is always discrete and finite.
\section{$\mathbf{SU(2)\times SU(2)}$}
Our task is now to repeat the previous exercise for $\Gamma =SU(2)\times SU(2)$. We use the notation
\begin{equation}
(k=e^J,h)\in SU(2)\times SU(2),
\end{equation}
In the $R\to \infty$ limit where the length of the arc is small compared to $R$, we have $k\sim 1\!\!1+ J$.
The symplectic structure of $T^*SU(2)$ is defined by the symplectic form $\omega=d\theta$ where
\begin{equation}
\theta=Tr[Jh^{-1}dh]. \label{thetazero}
\end{equation}
There are several possibilities for deforming this structure to have it well defined on $SU(2)\times SU(2)$. The simplest possibility is to take
\begin{equation}
\theta= Tr [k h^{-1} dh]
\end{equation}
which reduces to \eqref{thetazero} in the limit. The resulting symplectic form
\begin{eqnarray}
\omega= Tr [dk \wedge h^{-1} dh
- k h^{-1}dh \wedge h^{-1} dh]
\end{eqnarray}
is closed and invariant under $h\to \lambda h$ with $\lambda\in SU(2)$. (It is not invariant under $k\to \lambda k$, but this transformation is not a symmetry: it transforms small triangles into large ones). But there are others and more interesting phase space structures that one can write on the group $SU(2)\times SU(2)$. The different forms of compatibility between phase space structure and group structure are studied under the name of Poisson-Lie groups and quasi Poisson-Lie groups \cite{Marmo1993,Lu1990,Alekseev2000,Alekseev2002,Meusburger2008,Schroers2011}.
Instead of trying to guess physically interesting symplectic (or Poisson) structures, we go directly to the quantum theory and study the problem there. We can then recover a phase space structure form the classical limit of the quantum operator algebra. After all, in the real world it is the quantum theory to have a classical limit, not the other way around.
What we are seeking is therefore a deformation of the standard LQG operator algebra giving a \emph{finite} Hilbert space. For this, let us start recalling the action of the operators $h$ and $k=e^{J}$ on the standard LQG representation. This is,
\begin{equation}\label{U}
h\psi(U)=U\psi(U)
\end{equation}
and
\begin{equation}
J^i\psi(U)=L^i\psi(U).
\end{equation}
where $L^i$ is the left invariant derivative operator on the group manifold. Let us transform this to the canonical basis of $L_2[SU(2)]\sim \oplus_{j=0}^\infty ({\cal H}_j\otimes {\cal H}_j)
$
\begin{equation}\label{base}
\langle U | jmn\rangle=D^j_{mn}(U)
\end{equation}
defined by the Wigner matrices $D^j_{mn}$. The result is
\begin{equation}
J^i|jmn\rangle = \tau^{(j)}_{mk} |jkn\rangle. \label{J}
\end{equation}
where $\tau^{(j)}_{mk}$ are the $SU(2)$ generators in the $j$ representation, and
\begin{equation} \label{hold}
h_{AB}|jmn\rangle=\left(\begin{array}{ccc}
\frac12 & j & j' \\
A & m & m'
\end{array}
\right)\!\left(\begin{array}{ccc}
\frac12 & j & j' \\
B & n & n'
\end{array}
\right) |j'm'n'\rangle
\end{equation}
where $A,B$ are the indices of the $SU(2)$ matrix, repeated indices are summed over and the matrices are the Wigner 3j symbols. Equation \eqref{hold} is obtained from \eqref{U} and \eqref{base} by noticing that the group elements are the same as their spin-$\frac12$ representation and using the standard decomposition of products of representations.
The first of these two equations is analogous to the abelian case: the operator is defined on the finite dimensional Hilbert space formed by a single spin component.
The second equation, however, requires the quantum state space to be infinite dimensional, because there are non-vanishing Wigner 3j symbols anytime $j'=j\pm\frac12$. Can this equation be modified to adapt it to a finite dimensional Hilbert space? The answer is well known: let us \emph{define} the action of the $h$ operator in the constant curvature case to be
\begin{equation}
h_{AB}|jmn\rangle=\left(\begin{array}{ccc}
\frac12 & j & j' \\
A & m & m'
\end{array}
\right)_{\!\!q}\!\!
\left(\begin{array}{ccc}
\frac12 & j & j' \\
B & n & n'
\end{array}
\right)_{\!\!q} |j'm'n'\rangle \label{h}
\end{equation}
where we have replaced the Wigner 3j symbols with their $q$ deformation, with $q^r=-1$ for an integer $r$ \cite{Kauffman1994}. These operators are now well defined on the finite dimensional Hilbert space
\begin{equation}
{\cal H}= \oplus_{j=0}^{j_{max}} ({\cal H}_j\otimes {\cal H}_j)
\end{equation}
where
\begin{equation}
j_{max}=\frac{r-2}2.
\end{equation}
Equations \eqref{J} and \eqref{h} define the quantum theory in the constant curvature case, and represent our main proposal for the kinematics of quantum gravity in the presence of a cosmological constant. (Compare also with \cite{Major2008}.)
The $h$ operators no longer commute. This can be seen using the graphical notation. Writing the Wigner symbols as a trivalent node, the matrix elements of the $h$ operator read
\begin{equation}
(h_{AB})_{m'n'}^{mn}\ \ =\ \ \raisebox{-6.5mm}{\includegraphics[width=20mm]{h1.png}}~ .
\end{equation}
If we act with two operators we have
\begin{equation}
h_{AB}h_{CD}\ \ =\ ~ ~ ~ \raisebox{-6mm}{\includegraphics[width=15mm]{h2.png}}~ .
\end{equation}
while acting in the reverse order gives
\begin{equation}
h_{CD}h_{AB}\ \ =\ ~ ~ ~ \raisebox{-6mm}{\includegraphics[width=15mm]{h3.png}}~ .
\end{equation}
In the $R\to\infty$ (or $q=1$) case, the crossing of two lines gives at most a sign, which squared gives unit. Therefore the two operators commute. In the $q$ deformed case, the crossing gives a $q$ dependent factor \cite{Kauffman1994,Roberts1995} and therefore the operators fail to commute. If we call $R$ the operator giving the crossing, we have
\begin{equation}
h_{AB}h_{CD}=R_{AC}^{A'C'} R_{BD}^{B'D'}\ h_{C'D'}h_{A'B'},
\end{equation}
and if $R$ can be expanded in $\hbar$ as $R\sim 1+r$, we obtain classical Poisson brackets of the form
\begin{equation}
\{h_{AB},h_{CD}\}=r_{BD}^{B'D'} h_{CD'}h_{AB'}+r_{AC}^{A'C'} h_{C'D} h_{A'B}.
\end{equation}
Since the $h$ operators do not commute, there is no $h$ representation in the quantum theory anymore.
This completes the quantization of the $SU(2)\times SU(2)$ phase space. As in the abelian case, the resulting Hilbert space is finite dimensional. The dimension of the Hilbert space is determined by the ratio between the two constants: the one introduced by the quantization (physically: the Planck constant scale), and the constant curvature of the simplices, which enters via the deformation of the Poisson algebra -- physically: the cosmological constant.
A $q$-deformation of the dynamics renders quantum gravity finite. This is known since the early nineties in 2+1 dimensions thanks to the Turaev-Viro state sum model \cite{Turaev:1992hq}, which renders Ponzano Regge 2+1 quantum gravity finite, and whose strict connection to LQG was early pointed out \cite{Rovelli1993}. The result has been extended to 3+1 dimensions in \cite{Fairbairn:2010cp,Han:2010pz,Han:2011aa,Han:2013tap}. The $q$-deformation of the dynamics amounts to the introduction of a cosmological constant \cite{Mizoguchi:1991hk,Smolin95}; in 2+1, the relation between the deformation parameter $q$ and the cosmological constant $\lambda$ is \cite{Mizoguchi:1991hk,Rovelli}
\begin{equation}
q=e^{i\sqrt{\Lambda}\hbar G}.
\end{equation}
A $q$ deformations has been derived in LQG as a way to implement the dynamics of the theory with cosmological constant in \cite{Noui2011,Pranzetti2014}. Here we have shown that a $q$-deformation is also directly implied by the constant curvature of the individual simplices, and we have given the corresponding form of the geometrical operators of the gravitational theory.
\section{Physical considerations}
The Hilbert space $\cal H$ constructed above reduces to the usual LQG Hilbert space when the triangles are small compared to the curvature radius. Namely when the region considered is small compared to the cosmological constant scale. But there is a bound to this smallness, which is determined by the value of $j_{max}$, namely by the ratio of the cosmological constant scale to the Planck scale. The region considered can never be smaller than the Planck scale and therefore never arbitrarily small, in the units in which the constant curvature radius is units. (See \cite{Bianchi:2011uq} for a discussion of the geometrical interpretation of this ratio.)
The effect of the compactness of $SU(2)$ in conventional LQG is the discretization of the intrinsic geometry. In the quantization considered here, which takes the cosmological constant into account, there is a further compactness: the entire phase space, and not just the configuration space, is compact. Therefore also the variable conjugate to the intrinsic geometry is compact. This is evident form the fact that Hilbert space is finite dimensional (for each link), and therefore \emph{all} local operators have discrete spectrum. Therefore the extrinsic geometry is quantized as well.
The extrinsic curvature $K_{ab}$ determines the rate of change of the intrinsic geometry, because (in the Lapse=1, Shift=0 gauge) it is the proper-time derivative of the metric: $K_{ab}\sim dq_{ab}/dt$. Since $q_{ab}(\Delta t)\sim q_{ab}(0)+dq_{ab}/dt\ \Delta t$, we can infer the lapsed proper time $\Delta t$ from the values of $q_{ab}(0), q_{ab}(\Delta t)$ and $K_{ab}$. Since all these quantities have discrete spectrum, we expect proper-time intervals, measured using gravitational observables, to be discrete as well. While one expects the scale of minimum proper time to be Planckian, its full discrete spectrum can depend on the cosmological constant. This is similar to the angle discreteness pointed out by Seth Major \cite{Major2011a}.
Do these results generalise to 3+1 dimensions? In the Euclidean case, the situation appears very similar. In the presence of a cosmological constant, we cannot choose a discretization of spacetime with flat simplices, because these are not solutions of the field equations. A constant curvature four simplex is bounded by constant curvature tetrahedra, and the geometry of these determines again a compact space, as for the curved triangles considered above. A compact space, in turn, determines a finite Hilbert space for each link.
In the Lorentzian case, the problem is more subtle, because of the hyperbolic geometry. However, it seems reasonable to require single cells of the triangulation to stay within the De Sitter horizon. This again yields a maximal size, determined by the cosmological constant, and therefore a finite Hilbert space per each link. The situation, however, is still unclear in the Lorentzian 3+1 case.
\vskip1mm
\centerline{$\sim\sim\sim$}
\vskip1mm
{\em Note:} We understand that Han, Haggard, Kami\'nsky and Riello have related results in 3+1 dimensions, which will appear soon.
\vskip2mm
\noindent
{\bf Acknowledgements.} ~ FV thanks Hal Haggard and Muxin Han for detailed explanations on \cite{Haggard}, before publication, which have inspired this works. CR thanks Mait\'e Dupius, Florian and Ela Girelli, and Aldo Riello, for extensive discussion on the topic. \\ FV acknowledges support from the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO) Veni Fellowship Program. CR acknowledges support from Samy Maroun Research Center for Time, Space and the Quantum.\\
\providecommand{\href}[2]{#2}\begingroup\raggedright |
\section{}
\label{}
\section{}
\label{}
\section{Introduction}
Brain decoding
is an act of decoding exogenous and/or endogenous brain states from measurable brain activities \citep{haxby2001distributed,cox2003functional,kamitani2005decoding,shibata2011perceptual,horikawa2013neural}.
It has been attracting much attention in medical and industrial fields as a major next-generation technology.
Possible applications include brain machine interface (BMI) \citep{laconte2011decoding}, neuro rehabilitation \citep{sitaram2012acquired} and therapy of mental disorders \citep{sitaram2007fmri}.
Brain decoding is a function that takes brain activities as input and brain states as output, and its performance is evaluated by how well it approximates the real association between these two entities.
As such, it falls into the category of machine learning, and it is often studied in the particular framework of supervised learning \citep{lemm2011introduction}.
As in the case of any other applications of machine learning, the performance of the decoder depends heavily on the quality and quantity of the data used for its training.
Much difficulty remains in obtaining sufficient data from a single individual to build a reliable decoder.
One can extract only so much information from a single subject, because there is a limit to the mental and physical stress that the subject can endure.
One would therefore seek a decoder that can be trained using a big data amassed from multiple subjects, so that
we can reduce the stress per subject while granting the decoder an
ability to simultaneously decode heterogeneous dataset, i.e., a subject-transfer decoder \citep{fazli2009subject,raizada2012makes,marquand2014bayesian}.
For an ideal subject-transfer decoder, its decoding accuracy does not deteriorate over the dataset obtained from the population outside the group of individuals used in its training.
However, large subject-wide variation of the brain activities has long hindered the development of such decoders.
The scope of the brain decoding studies up until recent years has hence been restricted to subject-specific (\textit{tailor-made}) decoder that can only cope with the data from the very subject who provided the training dataset (e.g., \citet{cox2003functional,haxby2001distributed,nishimoto2011reconstructing,horikawa2013neural}).
In this work, we will present a subject-transfer decoder in the form of a deep neural network (DNN) trained with big data, a decoder aimed at classifying the brain activities into seven cognitive task categories.
For both training and testing, we used a large fMRI dataset in Human Connectome Project (HCP) gathered from over 500 subjects.
The application of DNN to fMRI dataset is not new; \citet{plis2013deep} used a fMRI-trained DNN to study schizophrenia patients, and \citet{hatakeyama2014multi} used still another variation of fMRI-trained DNN to classify hand motions.
Our work is the first of its kind in using a DNN to construct a subject-transfer decoder from big data.
Our subject-transfer decoder achieved higher decoding accuracy than any other baseline methods like support vector machine (SVM).
This is indicative of DNN's superior generalization ability over heterogeneous big data.
Also, decoding accuracy improved monotonically as the number of training subjects increased.
In the light of the fact that we are engaged in subject-transfer decoding, this monotonic trend suggests that our training is successfully extracting more subject-independent features from larger dataset.
This also shows that the size of the dataset contributes to the robustness of the decoder over heterogeneous population.
DNN together with big data thus emerges as an successful new approach to the subject-transfer decoding.
In order to further assess the efficiency of our trained DNN, we applied principal sensitivity analysis (PSA) \citep{Koyamada2014}, a brand new knowledge discovery procedure, to highlight the subject independent features
used by the decoders for its function.
By illustrating these features on the map of brain, we were able to make some connections between these features and functional connectivity reported in human fMRI studies \citep{raichle2001default,raichle2007default,taylor2009two,cole2013multi}.
This paper is structured as follows.
In the method section, we will provide the settings under which we trained our DNN, along with the specification of the dataset.
We will also provide the theoretical background of the PSA.
In the result section, we will compare the performance of our DNN against standard classification techniques, and show how the decoding accuracy of the DNN improved as the size of the training dataset increased.
We will also provide an interpretation of the PSA in terms of functional connectivity in the brain.
\section{Methods}
\subsection{fMRI data acquisition and preprocessing}
Human Connectome Project (HCP) is a scientific project ``to map macroscopic human brain circuits and their relationship to behavior in a large population of healthy adults'' \citep{van2013wu}, and it provides one of the largest open databases of fMRI that are publically available today.
In this study, we used the task-evoked fMRI data collected from 499 participants in Quarter 1 through Quarter 6,
which were preprocessed and registered by \citet{van2013wu,glasser2013minimal} (HCP S500 release).
For more details, see the HCP release reference manual\footnote{www.humanconnectome.org/documentation/S500}.
In this section, we will provide key data specifications and preprocessing procedure.
fMRI data of $499$ healthy adults were acquired by a Siemens 3T Skyra, with TR = $720$ ms, TE = $33.1$ ms, flip angle $52^\circ$, FOV = $208 \times 180$ mm, $72$ slices, $2.0 \times 2.0$ mm in plane resolution.
The preprocessing that had been applied to the fMRI data in the HCP prior to our own modification includes removal of spatial artifacts and distortions, within-subject cross-modal registrations, reduction of the bias field, and alignment to standard space.
In addition to these processes, we applied voxel-wise z-score transformation to the data and averaged the intensity over each anatomical region of interest (aROI).
The intention of the latter averaging procedure is to help the decoder learn features that are robust against
large inter-subject variability of brain activities.
aROIs were determined by the automated anatomical labeling method \citep{tzourio2002automated}.
In the end, the dimension per each preprocessed fMRI scan became 116.
The 499 participants (subjects) in the dataset we studied were asked to perform seven tasks related to the following categories: Emotion, Gambling, Language, Motor, Relational, Social and Working Memory (WM).
Each subject performed each task twice with time limits that varies across different tasks (see Table\,\ref{tab:1}).
Note that the number of scans conducted in the experiment varies across different tasks.
One hundred unrelated subjects completed all seven tasks.
The WM class occupied the largest proportion ($20.88$\%) of all scans for each subject.
The experimental design of each task is summarized below.
See \citet{barch2013function} for more details.
\begin{enumerate}
\item \textbf{Emotion:} Participants were asked to match one of two simultaneously presented images with a target image (angry face or fearful face). This is a modified version of the emotion task employed in \citet{hariri2002amygdala}.
\item \textbf{Gambling:} Participants were asked to play a simple game to get money. See \citet{delgado2000tracking} for more details.
\item \textbf{Language:} After listening to a brief story, participants were asked to answer a two-alternative forced choice question about the topic of the story. See \citet{binder2011mapping} for more details.
\item \textbf{Motor:} Participants were requested to move one of five body parts (left or right finger, left or right toe, or tongue) as instructed by a visual cue \citep{buckner2011organization}.
\item \textbf{Relational:} Each participant was presented with two pairs of objects, and was subsequently asked to answer a second-order question regarding the shapes/textures of the objects.
\item \textbf{Social:} Participants were presented with a movie clip, and were asked to decide whether the movements of the objects in the clips are related with each other in some way. The movie clips were originally prepared by \citet{castelli2000movement} and \citet{wheatley2007understanding}.
\item \textbf{WM (Working Memory):} Participants were asked to complete two-back working memory tasks and zero-back tasks with four different types of image stimuli (places, tools, faces or body parts).
\end{enumerate}
\begin{table}[htbp]
\centering
\caption{Number of scans per session and its duration (min:sec)}
{\small
\begin{tabular}{lccccccc}
\hline
& Emotion & Gambling & Language & Motor & Relational & Social & WM\\
\hline
Scans & 176 & 253 & 316 & 284 & 232 & 274 & 405 \\
Duration & 2:16 & 3:12 & 3:57 & 3:34 & 2:56 & 3:27 & 5:01 \\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\label{tab:1}
}
\end{table}
\subsection{Deep neural networks}
We trained a deep neural network (DNN) with the input being the fMRI signals over aROIs and the output being their labeled task classes, i.e., the category of cognitive task performed by the participants.
Prior to the training step, all fMRI scans were categorized into seven task classes, completely disregarding the time order. The weight parameters of the DNN were then trained to optimize the probability of successfully classifying the fMRI scans into the seven task categories (Fig.\,\ref{fig:dnn}).
\begin{figure}[htpb]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=1.05\columnwidth]{figures/fig_dnn/fig_dnn.pdf}
\caption{\label{fig:dnn}
We trained DNNs with the input being the fMRI scans and the output being their labeled task classes.}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
We trained feed-forward neural networks (i.e., DNNs) with $L$ hidden layers with stochastic gradient descent (SGD) with dropout \citep{Hinton2012}.
The internal potential of the $i$-th unit in the $l$-th hidden layer $a^{(l)}_i$ $(l = 1, \cdots, L)$ is given as a weighted summation of its inputs:
\begin{equation}
a^{(l)}_i = \sum_{j=1}^{n_{l-1}} w^{(l)}_{ij} z^{(l-1)}_j + b^{(l)}_i,
\end{equation}
where $w^{(l)}_{ij}$ and $b^{(l)}_i$ are a weight and a bias, respectively.
Here, $n_l$ is the number of units in the $l$-th hidden layer, which was set at $n_l = 500$ for any $l > 0$.
We define $\bvec{z}^{(0)}$ as the input vector $\bvec{x}$ to the network.
This forces $n_0$ to be equal to the input's dimensionality $d (=116)$.
We denote $\bvec{z}^{(l)} = \left(z^{(l)}_1, \cdots, z^{(l)}_{n_l}\right)$ as the outputs of the $l$-th hidden layer.
These outputs are given by applying a nonlinear activation function $h$ to the internal potential as
\begin{equation}
z^{(l)}_i = h(a^{(l)}_i)_{.}
\end{equation}
Here ReLU \citep{jarrett2009best}, a piecewise linear function $max(0, x)$, was used for the activation function $h$.
ReLU as a choice of the activation function has a couple of advantages; its piecewise linearity can save the computational cost to calculate its derivative, and its non-saturating character in the positive domain prevents the learning algorithm from halting due to gradient vanishing of nonlinear activation functions.
The last hidden layer was connected to the softmax (output) layer, so that the output from the $k$-th unit of the output layer can be interpreted as the posterior probability of class $k$, given by
\begin{equation}
P(Y = k \,|\, \bvec{x}, \bvec{W})
=
\frac{\exp\left(\sum_{j=1}^{n_L}w_{kj} z^{(L)}_j + b_k\right)}
{\sum_{k^{'}=1}^{K}\exp\left(\sum_{j=1}^{n_L}w_{k^{'}j} z^{(L)}_j + b_{k^{'}}\right)},
\end{equation}
where $K (=7)$ is the number of classes, and $\bvec{W}$ denotes all the parameters (weights and biases) of the whole network.
Here, $Y$ is a random variable signifying the class to which $\bvec{x}$ belongs.
We used a negative log-likelihood as the cost function of the learning
\begin{equation}
L(\bvec{W}) = - \sum_{n=1}^{N} \log P(Y_n = t_n \,|\, \bvec{x}_n, \bvec{W}),
\end{equation}
where $\left\{(\bvec{x}_1, t_1), \cdots, (\bvec{x}_N, t_N)\right\}$ constituted the given dataset.
Here $t \in \left\{1, \cdots, K\right\}$ denotes a class label.
To minimize the above cost function, minibatch stochastic gradient descent (MSGD) was introduced so that SGD was performed every 100 samples:
\begin{align}
\bvec{W}_{t} &= \bvec{W}_{t-1} - \eta_{t} \left. \frac{\partial
L'(\bvec{W})}{\partial \bvec{W}} \right|_{\bvec{W}_{t-1}},
\end{align}
where $L'$ is the cost function for the cached subset of 100 samples in the minibatch, and $\eta_{t}$ is the learning rate.
For our case we adopted a constant rate $\eta_{t} = \eta_{0}$, and this value was set at either of $\{0.1, 1.0\}$ that yielded better result for the validation dataset (see Section\,\ref{sec:decoding_setting}).
Each weight of hidden layers was initialized at a small value randomly sampled from a zero-mean normal distribution with the standard deviation of $0.01$, and weights of softmax layer and biases were initialized to zero.
Early stopping was also adopted; if the decoding accuracy for the validation dataset did not increase for $100$ learning epochs, then learning was terminated.
To further avoid over-fitting, we used the dropout technique \citep{Hinton2012}.
During the training, the activity $z^{(l)}_i$ was randomly replaced by $0$ with probability $p$.
We set $p = 0.5$ for hidden units and $0.2$ for inputs.
This drop-out procedure plays a role of regularization
and is expected to prevent the decoder from acquiring subject-specific features.
When testing the trained neural network,
all the nodes were activated, and their weights were multiplied by $1-p$.
This is to make the mean activity level of each network element consistent
between the training phase and the test phase.
\subsection{Subject-transfer decoding}
\label{sec:decoding_setting}
To examine the subject-transferability of our decoder's architecture, we selected hundred individuals from all $499$ subjects who (1) are unrelated with each other and (2) successfully completed all seven cognitive tasks twice.
Let $D$ be the dataset of these $100$ subjects.
We then executed a \textit{leave-10-subjects-out} (or \textit{10-folds}) cross calidation to the dataset $D$.
To be more specific, the $D$ was partitioned into a test dataset of $10$ subjects, a validation dataset of $10$ subjects, and a training dataset of $80$ subjects without any overlap.
We trained our DNN with the training dataset, while using the validation dataset to determine the hyper parameters and to perform early stopping.
We then tested the decoding accuracy of trained DNNs over the test dataset.
We repeated this cycle $10$ times, choosing different test and validation datasets in each iteration.
In order to examine how the size of the dataset influences the decoding accuracy, we conducted the above experiments with different size of training dataset ($10 \sim 80$ subjects) without changing the test dataset and the validation dataset.
\subsection{Analysis for trained decoder}
The purpose of the brain decoder is here to classify the brain activities into seven categories.
The result of the classification itself, however, does not necessarily give informatoin of neuroscientific bases behind the classification.
One might therefore wish to investigate the decoder in an attempt to learn the signature that characterizes each target class.
This approach relies on the philosophy of ``knowledge discovery,'' and one may interpret these signatures acquired by the decoder as the decoder's knowledge.
Any association between the knowledge of the brain decoder and the knowledge of the neuroscience can help assess the reason why the decoder performs well/terrible, and in some case help understand the neural bases useful in brain decoding.
In the case of linear decoders, the weight visualization is often used for this purpose \citep{miyawaki2008visual,abraham2014machine}.
Such visualization can be inappropriate for decoders with a nonlinear and hierarchical architecture like DNN because the middle layer will mask the direct relation between the input and output.
A well known alternative to the weight visualization in such cases is the sensitivity analysis \citep{Zurada1994,Zurada1997,Kjems2002}, which computes the expected sensitivity of the classifier's output (posterior probability of the successful classification) with respect to the perturbation in the input.
In this study, we applied principal sensitivity analysis (PSA)
introduced by the authors \citep{Koyamada2014}, a PCA like extension of the sensitivity analysis, to our DNN-based decoder.
PSA distinguishes itself from the ordinary sensitivity analysis in that it can identify the direction in the input space to which the classifier is most sensitive.
It can also decompose the input space into the classifier-sensitive spaces and rank them in order of sensitivity.
In next two subsections, we briefly describe the sensitivity analysis and PSA.
\subsubsection{Sensitivity analysis}
Let $f_k(\bvec{x}):\mathbb{R}^{\mathrm{d}} \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ be the logarithm of the output from the $k$-th unit in the final layer, namely
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:f_k}
f_k(\bvec{x}) := \log P(Y = k \,|\, \bvec{x}, \bvec{W}),
\end{equation}
where $\bvec{W}$ is the parameters of the trained decoder. For simplicity, we would omit index $k$ in the rest of this section.
The sensitivity of $f$ with respect to the $i$-th input feature is defined by
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:original_sensitivity}
s_i := E_q \left[ \left(\frac{\partial f(\bvec{x})}{\partial x_i} \right)^2 \right],
\end{equation}
where $q$ is the true input distribution.
In actual implementation, the expectation \eqref{eq:original_sensitivity} is computed with respect to the empirical distribution of the test dataset.
\citet{Kjems2002} defined the vector
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:classical_def}
\bvec{s} := \left(s_1, \dots, s_d \right)
\end{equation}
of these values as \textbf{sensitivity map} over the set of input features.
This sensitivity map will give us a measure for the degree of importance that the classifier puts to each input.
\subsubsection{Principal Sensitivity Analysis (PSA)}
The purpose of the PSA is to compute the direction $\bvec{v}$ for which $f$ is most sensitive in the input space.
This amounts to solving the following optimization problem about $\bvec{v}$:
\begin{eqnarray}
\label{eq:psm}
\begin{aligned}
& \text{maximize}
& & s(\bvec{v})\\
& \text{subject to}
& & \bvec{v}^{\mathrm{T}}\bvec{v} = 1,
\end{aligned}
\end{eqnarray}
where $s(\bvec{v})$ is the sensitivity of $f$ for the direction $\bvec{v}$, given by
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:sensitivity_for_direction}
s(\bvec{v}) := E_q\left[ \left\| \nabla_{\bvec{v}} f(\bvec{x}) \right\|_2^2 \right],
\end{equation}
where $\left\|\cdot\right\|_2$ defines the L$2$-norm.
Recall that the directional derivative is defined by
\begin{equation}
\nabla_{\bvec{v}} f(\bvec{x}) = \bvec{v}^{\mathrm{T}} \nabla f(\bvec{x}).
\end{equation}
Because we can rewrite $s(\bvec{v})$ as $\bvec{v}^{\mathrm{T}}\bvec{K}\bvec{v}$, where $K := E_{q} \left[ \nabla f(\bvec{x}) \nabla f(\bvec{x})^{\mathrm{T}} \right]$, the optimization problem \eqref{eq:psm} equals to
\begin{eqnarray}
\label{eq:psm_rewrite}
\begin{aligned}
& \text{maximize}
& & \bvec{v}^{\mathrm{T}}\bvec{K}\bvec{v}\\
& \text{subject to}
& & \bvec{v}^{\mathrm{T}}\bvec{v} = 1.
\end{aligned}
\end{eqnarray}
The solution to this problem is simply the maximal eigenvector $\pm\bvec{v}^{*}$ of $\bvec{K}$.
\citet{Koyamada2014} defined this vector as \textbf{principal sensitivity map (PSM)} over the space of input features.
The magnitude of $v_i$ represents the extent to which $f$ is sensitive to the $i$-th input feature, and the sign of $v_i$ tells us the relative direction to which the input feature influences $f$.
Recall that, if the positive definite matrix $\bvec{K}$ is replaced by the covariance $E_q[\bvec{x}\bvec{x}^{\mathrm{T}}]$, where $\bvec{x}$ is the centered random variable, the optimization problem \eqref{eq:psm_rewrite} can be seen as the problem of solving for the first principal component of the ordinary PCA.
Since the $k$-th component of the ordinary PCA is the $k$-th dominant eigenvector of the covariance matrix, the $k$-th dominant eigenvector of $\bvec{K}$ can be called the \textbf{$k$-th principal sensitivity map ($k$-th PSM)}.
These sub-principal sensitivity maps grant us access to even richer
information that underlies the dataset through the classifier.
\section{Results}
First, we compared the decoding accuracy of the DNNs with those of other baseline methods using the dataset $D$ (see Section\,\ref{sec:decoding_setting}).
We trained three neural networks with one, two and three hidden layers, each with the output logistic regression layer.
The baseline methods investigated in this study
include logistic (softmax) regression, which corresponds to 0-hidden layer neural network and SVMs with linear kernel and RBF kernel (see Appendix A for the specification of these baseline methods).
The mean decoding accuracy and its standard deviation in the \textit{leave-10-subjects-out} cross validation are summarized in Table\,\ref{tab:decoding_accuracy}.
The decoding accuracies of the DNN decoders not only exceeded the \textit{prior} chance level (the true fraction of the largest class, $20.88$\%), but were also higher than those of the other baseline methods.
In particular, the DNN with two hidden layers exhibited the best decoding accuracy of $50.74$\%, which was significantly higher than that of the RBF-kernel SVM ($p < 0.01 $, one-sided Welch test).
Linear methods, the logistic regression and the linear-kernel SVM,
showed poor decoding accuracies that are comparable to the chance level.
These results clearly show the advantage of nonlinear decoders over linear decoders in the subject-transfer setting, and suggest that the DNN may be more effective in extracting subject-independent features from big data than the other baseline methods.
\begin{table}
\label{tab:decoding_accuracy}
{\small
\caption{Sujbect-transfer decoding performance}
\centering
\begin{tabular}{lrr}
\hline
\textbf{Method} &\textbf{Architecture} & \textbf{Mean accuracy [\%] $\pm$ s.d.} \\
\hline
Logistic regression & $116$-$7$ & 20.81 $\pm$ 0.15 \\
Support vector machine & Linear kernel & 20.87 $\pm$ 0.01 \\
Support vector machine & RBF kernel & 47.97 $\pm$ 1.57 \\
Neural network & $116$-$500$-$7$ & 48.94 $\pm$ 1.15 \\
Neural network & $116$-$500$-$500$-$7$ & \textbf{50.74} $\pm$ 1.25 \\
Neural network & $116$-$500$-$500$-$500$-$7$ & 50.57 $\pm$ 1.31 \\
\hline
\textit{Prior} chance level & & 20.88 \\
\hline
\end{tabular}
}
\end{table}
Second, we investigated how the decoder's performance changes with the size of training dataset.
We trained the decoder with various sizes of training dataset, and plotted the decoding accuracy against the dataset size.
In this set of experiments, we employed the DNN with two hidden layers ($L = 2$),
which showed better decoding accuracy than the $L = 1$ and $L = 3$ versions over the dataset $D$.
To evaluate the performance of a DNN decoder trained with a training set of $M$ subjects,
we used the following cross validation procedure.
The setup of the cross validation is basically same as the one explained in Section\,\ref{sec:decoding_setting}.
At each iteration of the cross validation procedure, we selected $10$ subjects for the test set, $10$ subjects for the validation set, and $M$ subjects for the training set from the dataset $D$ without any overlap.
We repeated this process $10$ times, selecting $10$ entirely new subjects for the test set at each iteration.
We conducted this set of iteration procedure for $M = 10 \sim 80$.
In order to check the asymptotic trend of the decoding accuracy, we examined the $M = 479$ case as well, in which all of the $499$ subjects registered in the S500 release were used.
The results are displayed in Fig.\,\ref{fig:change_n}.
As the number of subjects in the training dataset increased from $10$ to $80$, the performance of the DNN decoder also increased, as expected.
The performance was best at $M = 479$.
We attribute this trend to the positive relationship between the size of the training dataset and the reliability of the subject-independent features captured by the DNN decoder.
This result also implies that our DNN-based subject-transfer decoding would become increasingly more practical if we can access to the brain signal databases gathered from even larger set of subjects.
DNN together with big data thus proves to be an effective approach in subject-transfer decoding.
\begin{figure}[htbp]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=0.98\columnwidth]{figures/fig3/change_n.pdf}
\caption{\label{fig:change_n}
Mean decoding accuracy plotted against the number of training subjects ($M$) in log scale.
Error bars indicate s.d. across ten cross validation iterations.}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
In order to extract the discriminative features in brain activities captured by brain decoder trained with the large scale database, we conducted principal sensitivity analysis (PSA).
PSA is different from the standard sensitivity analysis in that it quantifies the \textit{combinations} of aROIs used in the decoder's classification, whereas the standard sensitivity analysis computes the independent contribution of each aROI to the decoder's decision.
The PSA is more suited for our purpose because there is a strong evidence of functional connectivity among aROIs \citep{Buckner2013, Cole2014}, and classifiers with high decoding accuracy are likely to capture coactivation patterns of aROIs.
The expectation in equation\,\eqref{eq:sensitivity_for_direction} depends on the distribution $q$ over the sample space.
In order to best approximate the true distribution of $q$, we used the empirical distribution over the dataset of all subjects except the subjects used in $D$.
Fig.\,\ref{fig:PSA}(a) shows the first, second and third PSMs for Emotion and Motor classes\footnote{See Appendix B Fig.\,\ref{fig:appendix_psa} for the PSMs of the other classes.}.
The set of PSMs presented in Fig.\,\ref{fig:PSA}(a) is one of the $10$ variants of the sets of PSMs obtained in the \textit{leave-$10$-subjects-out} cross validation over the dataset $D$.
These variants did not exhibit siginificant variation.
PSMs are superior to standard sensitibity maps in that they can describe the aROIs which act oppositely in characterizing the class.
Any pair of anatomical regions with different color assignments in Fig.\,\ref{fig:PSA} contributes to the classifier's decision in opposite direction.
Our PSA seems to imply that the information learned by our DNN-based subject-transferable decoder has some correlation with the existing knowledge of functional connectivity supported in neuroscience.
For instance, in the 2nd PSM of Motor class and the first PSM of Social class (Fig.\,\ref{fig:PSA}),
we can identify the two sets of functional connectivitiy established in previous works, namely fronto-parietal network \citep{cole2013multi} and salience network \citep{taylor2009two}.
In the 2nd PSM of Social class (Fig.\,\ref{fig:PSA}), we can also find a component of the default mode network \citep{raichle2007default, raichle2001default} in the left hemisphere.
In addition, to quantify the similarity of PSMs, we calculated the absolute cosine similarity for each pair of the PSMs and aligned the maps by hierarchical clustering (Fig.\,\ref{fig:PSA}(b)).
For any pair of PSMs ($\bvec{v}_1, \bvec{v}_2$), the absolute cosine similarity was calculated by $\left|\langle\bvec{v}_1, \bvec{v}_2\rangle\right|$, where $\langle\cdot, \cdot\rangle$ is an inner product, because of $\|\bvec{v}\|_2 = 1$ for each PSM $\bvec{v}$.
In the similarity matrix, we can confirm two large clusters, consisting mainly of first and second PSMs, respectively.
This implies that the funcational connectivity interpretation that we
made above for the first and the second PSMs of the Social class and the
the first PSM of the Motor class applies to all the other PSMs sharing
the same cluster memberships (see also Appendix B Fig.\,\ref{fig:appendix_psa}).
On the other hand, the sub-principal PSMs, such as the third PMSs of Emotion and Motor classes, showed task-specific features.
Finally, note that many of our PSMs span large brain regions.
This suggests that the subject independent features that we extracted from the large fMRI database in our deep learning procedure are specific(common) brain-wide networks that activates during particular(all) task(s).
\begin{figure}[htpb]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=0.99\columnwidth]{figures/psa_final/psa_and_similarity.eps}
\caption{\label{fig:PSA}
(a)
We calculated the first, second and third PSMs for each class. The PSMs of Motor and Social classes are shown here (see Appendix B Fig.\,\ref{fig:appendix_psa} for the other classes).
We recall that we intentionally omitted the class index in the formulation \eqref{eq:psm_rewrite} for simplicity,
and that PSMs are actually meant to be computed for each class separately.
In the visualization of each PSM, we exclusivly colored the ROIs with values that are at least one s.d. away from the mean.
Red and blue indicate different signs in the PSM values, i.e., the corresponding aROIs act oppositely in characterizing the class.
(b)
Similarity between maps was evaluated by cosine similarity.
We calculated the absolute value of cosine similarity (for definition, see the text) between all pairs of the first, second and third PSMs of the seven classes. Based on these similarity values, we applied a hierarchical clustering to the set of all the computed PSMs.
The similarity matrix above is based on leaf order in the dendrogram (attached to the left side of the matrix) obtained by the hierarchical clustering. Intensity of the color indicates the degree of similarity.
}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
\section{Conclusion}
In this study, we applied deep learning to a large fMRI database to classify brain activities into seven human categories.
In particular, we constructed a DNN-based brain decoder aimed at classifying the brain activities of
\textit{any arbitrary} individual.
The strength of DNN is its high ability to capture nonlinear, high dimensional features from bigdata.
In fact, the decoding accuracy of our DNN was superior to those of other baseline methods, including SVMs
and logistic regressions.
The high performance of our DNN over the dataset acquired from a large population is indicative of the ability of
our decoder to capture nonlinear discriminative features that are common to all subjects.
Interestingly, when we visualzied these universal discriminative features in the form of PSMs, we were able to find non trivial associations between the features and functionally connected networks recognized in neuroscience.
This observation suggests that the functional connectivity common to all subjects are playing important roles in characterizing task-specific brain activities.
Furthermore, our DNN-based decoder leaves some room for further improvement.
For instance, the training of DNN and its final performance depend largely on the initial parameters.
One may use our DNN as a initial model to construct a decoder that is highly tuned for a specific individual.
One can expect such decoder to utilize both subject-independent features and subject-specific features.
As another interesting extension to this research, we may add demographic features like age and sex to the model.
The flexibility of DNN architecture allows for numerous modification of the base model.
Also, the relationship between the number of training subjects and the decoding accuracy was positive.
With a bigger and more multimodal dataset and a DNN with more sophisticated architecture, one might be able to capture richer signatures that are otherwise difficult to uncover, and such signatures might inspire a novel insight into neural bases recruited in different situations in the brain.
Our results hint that advanced machine learning techniques will continue
to grow in importance in the coming era of computational neuroscience that finds its basis in the statistics of heterogenous big data.
\section*{Acknowledgement}
Data were provided by the Human Connectome Project,
WU-Minn Consortium\footnote{Principal Investigators: David Van Essen and Kamil Ugurbil;
1U54MH091657} funded by the 16 NIH Institutes and Centers that support
the NIH Blueprint for Neuroscience Research; and by the McDonnell Center
for Systems Neuroscience at Washington University.
\section{}
\bibliographystyle{elsarticle-harv}
|
\section{Introduction}
Recent supernova surveys have lead to the identification of an
increasing number of non-terminal optical transients with a wide range
of properties. Some of these optical transients appear to be similar
to the giant eruptions of the $\eta$ Car variables \citep{Humphreys:1999,Van-Dyk:2005,Van-Dyk:2012}, while others are more akin to the variability of normal Luminous Blue Variables (LBVs). A very small fraction of the optical transients originate from lower luminosity, heavily obscured progenitors that may be extreme asymptotic giant branch (AGB) stars or in a post red supergiant stage of evolution \citep{Thompson:2009, Khan:2010, Bond:2011}. The continued monitoring of these optical transients has led to the realization that in some cases the apparent terminal explosion is preceded by smaller eruptions, e.g. SN2005gl \citep{Gal-Yam:2007,Galyam09}, SN2006jc \citep{Pastorello:2007} and most recently the peculiar SN2009ip \citep{Mauerhan:2013, Pastorello:2013, Fraser:2013, Margutti:2013}. Consequently, the connection between LBVs, giant eruptions, and true supernovae has come into question. But very little is
known about the origin of these giant eruptions, their progenitors and
their evolutionary state. An improved census of the most massive,
evolved stars including the LBVs, and the hypergiants that occupy the upper HR Diagram is necessary to better characterize the properties of the
possible progenitors. For these reasons,
we have begun a survey of the evolved massive star populations in
several nearby galaxies \citep{Humphreys:2013, Grammer:2013a, Humphreys:2014}.
This paper is the third in a series on the massive star content of M101. In the first two papers, we presented the photometric analysis and identification of the luminous and massive star populations, here we present spectroscopy and multi-epoch imaging
for the most luminous stars. In the next section, we describe our target selection, observations, and data reduction. In $\S3$ we discuss the stars for which we have spectra and light curves, and in $\S4$, we present the light curves for those without spectra. We
summarize our conclusions in the last section.
\section{Data and Observations}
Our motivation for this study is to examine the spectra and photometric variability
of the most luminous stars in M101. Using their spectra and light curves,
we identify LBV candidates, hypergiants, and other luminous stars and emission-line stars.
\subsection{Target Selection}
Most of our targets were selected from the Hubble Legacy Archive (HLA) aperture photometry of \textit{HST}/ACS images from proposals GO-9490 (Nov. 2002) and GO-9492 (Jan. 2003) to be brighter than $V\approx20.5$ mag. Since the images of M101 are crowded, particularly in the spiral arms, we later performed our own photometry using Dolphot \citep{Dolphin:2000} to create a catalog of high precision photometry even in crowded regions \citep[hereafter Paper I]{Grammer:2013a}. In this paper, photometry from Paper I is referred to as the catalog photometry. We cross-identified targets selected from the HLA with the catalog using a tolerance of 0.1$\arcsec$ in radial separation. We note that a few of the targets with $V < 20.5$ in the HLA photometry are much fainter in the catalog. The targets with differences in $V$ larger than a few tenths of a magnitude are in regions where aperture photometry is inappropriate (e.g. crowded regions). We visually inspected the surrounding region of each unmatched star and found in all cases, that the unmatched targets were located in parts of the galaxy where photometry was likely to be highly compromised.
In addition to the targets selected from \textit{HST}/ACS photometry, we included blue supergiants and known luminous variables from \cite{Sandage:1974c} and \cite{Sandage:1983}. The blue supergiants and luminous variables were originally identified on photographic images. Since precise astrometry is required for our study, we used a Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) $g$ image of M101 to identify the blue supergiants and known variables by eye. Many of the \cite{Sandage:1983} stars were also in regions of significant crowding which made positive identification difficult. Thus, we were only able to include 7 stars: B4, B53, B65, B162, V2, V4, and V9.
\subsection{Spectroscopy}
When we were selecting targets for spectroscopy, we did not yet have
the light curves from the Large Binocular Telescope (LBT) survey,
discussed below \S {2.3}.
Since we could not obtain spectra for every star, we prioritized
our targets for spectroscopy by roughly estimating their variability using an ``absdiff'' image.
The absdiff image was created by taking the absolute value of the difference between a reference image, described below, and all other images. Then, the subtracted images were convolved with a 2 pixel Guassian filter and summed. In the absdiff image, the ``brighter'' the source, the more variable it is likely to be. All stars with HLA $V$-band magnitudes
brighter than 20.5 mag were then overlaid onto the absdiff image.
Priority for spectroscopy was assigned by degree of variability
and $V$-band magnitude. Thus the brightest stars with clear indications of variability received the highest priority. We selected 56 of the brightest and most
variable stars for spectroscopy with the Hectospec on the Multiple Mirror Telescope (MMT), and 46 of the fainter ones for spectroscopy with the LBT MODS1 spectrograph. The spectrscopic targets are shown in Figure~\ref{figFOV}.
\begin{figure}
\figurenum{1}
\epsscale{0.8}
\plotone{Fig.1.eps}
\caption[POSS II red image of M101]{POSS II red image of M101. Spectroscopic ta
rgets observed with MMT/Hectospec are shown as crosses and LBT/MODS as boxes. T
argets without spectra are shown as circles.}
\label{figFOV}
\end{figure}
The MMT observations were obtained in June 2012 with the Hectospec multi-object spectrometer \citep[MOS;][]{Fabricant:1998}. The
Hectospec\footnotemark[1] is a fiber-fed MOS with a 1$^{\circ}$ FOV
and 300 fibers; each fiber subtends $1.5\arcsec$
on the sky. We used the 600 mm$^{-1}$ grating with the blue tilt centered on 4800{\AA} and the red tilt centered on 7300{\AA}.
The 600 mm$^{-1}$ grating gives a spectral coverage of $\sim2500${\AA}
with 0.54{\AA} pixel$^{-1}$ resolution. The total integrated exposure times were 240
minutes in the blue and 180 minutes in
the red. The spectra were reduced using an exported version of the CfA/SAO SPECROAD package for Hectospec data E-SPECROAD\footnotemark[2]. The
specta were bias subtracted, flat -fielded, wavelength calibrated,
and sky subtracted. The IRAF task \texttt{sensfunc}, in the \textit{ONEDSPEC} package, was used to flux calibrate the spectra with the standard Feige-66.
\footnotetext[1]{http://www.cfa.harvard.edu/mmti/hectospec.html}
\footnotetext[2]{External SPECROAD was developed by Juan Cabanela for use on Linux or MacOS X systems outside of CfA. It is available online at http://iparrizar.mnstate.edu.}
The 46 stars selected for observation with the LBT were observed
in May 2012 and June 2013 using the Multiple Object Dual Spectrograph (MODS) \citep{Pogge:2006}. For multi-object spectroscopy MODS uses masks with a 6.5 arcmin FOV, and a dichroic with two gratings, 400 mm$^{-1}$ and 670 mm$^{-1}$, to get a full spectral range of 3200{\AA} to 10000{\AA}, and
moderate resolution (R $\sim$ 1800). Since the MODS FOV is considerably
smaller than Hectospec, four masks were required to cover the disk of
M101. Problems with a beta version of the reduction pipeline prevented us from including
the LBT spectra here.
Analysis of the LBT/MODS spectra will be included in a future paper.
The 31 confirmed members are listed in order of right ascension in Table~\ref{tab:spec_members} with object identification, position, photometry, variability
and their spectral type. The 19 foreground stars are
in Table 2. The S/N in the spectra for six of the targets
was too poor to assign a spectral type. The blue and red spectra of all of
the targets are
available at http://etacar.umn.edu/LuminousStars/M101/ in FITS format.
The flux calibrated and smoothed spectra are also available in a subdirectory.
Spectra of selected members are discussed in the next section.
\subsection{LBT Imaging}
M101 has been monitored as part of a variability survey of 27 nearby ($<10$ Mpc) galaxies using the twin 8.4m LBT \citep{Kochanek:2008,Gerke}. Between March 2008 and January 2013, M101 was observed using the Large Binocular Camera (LBC) in the $R$-band with the red-optimized LBC-Red camera while simultaneously cycling through observations in the $UBV$ filters with the blue-optimized LBC-Blue camera \citep{Giallongo:2008}. One of us, J. Gerke, did the basic data reduction steps including overscan correction, bias subtraction, and flat fielding with the IRAF \textit{MSCRED} package, as well as the subsequent analysis of the images. Although M101 was observed even in sub-optimal conditions, only images with a point spread function (PSF) with a full width half max (FWHM) $\lesssim2\arcsec$ are analyzed.
For the variability analysis, the ISIS image subtraction package \citep{Lupton:1998, Alard:2000} was used to process the multiple LBT images. The image subtraction works by matching a reference image to each exposure and subtracting it to leave only the sources which have time-variable flux. The reference image was created by median combining the four best seeing epochs where an epoch is defined as the images for one night. The astrometric solutions were determined using the IRAF package \textit{MSCTPEAK} and SDSS stars \citep{Ivezic:2007} in the FOV. For each epoch, the $R$-band image serves as the astrometric reference image for all four filters which ensures identical astrometric solutions between filters. By doing this, any ambiguity associated with cross-matching sources between filters is minimized. The typical astrometric errors are $0.1\arcsec$.
The light curves for the stars with HLA $V$-band magnitudes brighter than 20.5 mag were extracted using ISIS. Instrumental magnitudes for each epoch were converted to $UBVR$ magnitudes using photometric calibrations based on SDSS photometry which was transformed from the SDSS $ugriz$ filter system to the $UBVR$ system using the prescription described by \citet{Jordi:2006}. The resulting photometry has photometric errors that are $\lesssim0.06$ magnitudes. For each target, we calculate the root-mean-square (RMS) error, with respect to the median magnitude, as a measure of stellar variability. We identify targets as variable sources for further analysis if their RMS variability is greater than the median photometric error. The $V$-band light curves for spectroscopic targets observed with MMT which met our criterion for variability are shown in Figure~\ref{figSpecLC}
\begin{figure}
\figurenum{2}
\epsscale{0.8}
\plotone{Fig.2.eps}
\caption{The LBT light curves for our stars with spectra that also meet our cri
terion for variability. Foreground stars are not shown
. The x-axis grid lines correspond to 365 days.}
\label{figSpecLC}
\end{figure}
\section{Classification of the Stars}
For discussion, we have grouped the spectra of the confirmed
members by their broad spectral characteristics and known variability.
In this section we describe the characteristics of four groups: the early-type
or hot supergiants, intermediate-type supergiants, emission-line sources, and candidate LBVs. We describe the criteria for membership in each group in the subsections below and
discuss the spectra, photometry, and light curves of several interesting
or representative stars. Group membership and comments on their spectra and variability are also included in Table~\ref{tab:spec_members}.
For reference, we assume the distance modulus, derived from the tip of the red giant branch, of (m-M)$_{0}$ = 29.05 $\pm$ 0.06(random) $\pm$ 0.12 (systematic) magnitudes \citep{Shappee:2011}. The foreground extinction towards M101 is only E$(B-V)$ = 0.01 \citep{Schlegel:1998} which corresponds to a visual extinction of $A_{V}$ = 0.03 magnitudes assuming a Galactic extinction law \citep{Cardelli:1989}. For those stars with
spectral types, we estimate the internal extinction by comparing their observed colors with the intrinsic colors from \citet[see Table~\ref{tab:spec_members}]{Flower:1977,Flower:1996}.
Representative blue spectra from $\approx$3900 -- 5200{\AA} are shown in Figures 3 to 6, and snapshot images of the confirmed members are in the Appendix.
\subsection{The Hot Supergiants}
This group includes the luminous O- and B-type supergiants.
Many of these stars show strong emission lines, mostly nebular, but with an
absorption line spectrum strong enough to allow an estimate of the
spectral type. In this section we describe stars with interesting spectral features and/or photometric variability.
The spectrum of \textit{9490$\_$02$\_$598 (early B: I + WN + ?)} shows absorption lines of Si IV $\lambda\lambda$4090 and 4116, Si III $\lambda$4552, C III $\lambda$4650, and He I $\lambda\lambda$4026 and 4144 consistent with an early B-type supergiant (Figure~\ref{figHotSp}), although a Ca II K line is also present. The Balmer series, as well as the He I lines of $\lambda\lambda$ 4471, 4922, 6678 and 7065 are in emission with P-Cygni profiles. He I $\lambda$ 5876 has a double or split emission profile not present in any of the other emission lines. Emission lines of Fe II, [Fe II], and the broad WN nitrogen emission features at $\lambda$4630-4670{\AA} and $\lambda$5680-5730{\AA} are present. The terminal velocity, determined from P-Cygni profiles, is normally measured from the blue edge of the absorption component. Because the spectra are moderate resolution with low S/N, we can more reliably determine the wind velocity from the absorption minima, see \citep{Humphreys:2014}. We find a wind velocity of $392.0\pm12.6$ kms$^{-1}$ which is on the low end, but in the range for normal early-type supergiants \citep{Crowther:2006, Mokiem:2007}.
The catalog photometry for 9490$\_$02$\_$598 is $V$ = 20.07 and $(B-V)$ = 0.30. Based on its early B-type spectrum , we assume an intrinsic $(B-V)_{0}$ color of $\approx$ -0.20 \citep{Flower:1977, Flower:1996} yielding a fairly high interstellar extinction of A$_{v}$ of 1.6 mag and M$_{v}$ = -10.5 mag. Inspection of the \textit{HST}/ACS $V$ band image shows that 9490$\_$02$\_$598 may be a point source although it is located in a crowded region (Figure A10). It was not identified as a point source in the LBT images due to poorer spatial resolution, thus we do not have variability information. The spectrum is similar to an LBV in quiescence \citep{Humphreys:1994} but without a light curve we cannot say with any certainty that 9490$\_$02$\_$598 is an LBV candidate. With the Ca II K line it may be composite.
The spectrum of \textit{9490$\_$a3$\_$11594(Early B: I + WN:)} is shown
in Figure~\ref{figHotSp}. The presence of the C III/O II features at $\lambda\lambda$4068-4076, Si IV at $\lambda$4089 and $\lambda$4116 and absorption lines of He I at $\lambda\lambda$4026, and 4144 indicate that it has an early B-type spectrum. It also has a weak WN feature at $\lambda\lambda$ 4630-4670.
The relative strength of the O II $\lambda\lambda$4070-4076 to He I $\lambda$4026 indicates high luminosity. The emission lines are primarily nebular. We note that H$\beta$, He I $\lambda$5876 and the [O III] lines are double, but the [N II], [S II] and H$\alpha$ in the red are not. These double emission lines are discussed below.
The catalog photometry for 9490$\_$a3$\_$11594 is $V$ = 21.5 and $(B-V)$ = 0.06, but
the HLA and LBT photometry show it $\approx$2 magnitudes brighter and $\approx$0.3 magnitudes redder than the catalog photometry. 9490$\_$a3$\_$11594 is located in a crowded region (Figure A12), thus the magnitudes obtained
from aperture photometry may be significantly altered by the neighboring stars. The
multi-epoch photometry for 9490$\_$a3$\_$11594 shows no variability in magnitude or color.
\textit{9490$\_$a1$\_$7093 (Mid B: I)} has strong Balmer and
nebular emission lines (Figure~\ref{figHotSp}). It resembles 9490$\_$02$\_$598 with He I absorption lines $\lambda$4026, $\lambda$4144, and $\lambda$4387 and the C III/O II absorption feature. These lines suggest an early B-type spectrum, but the Mg II $\lambda$4481 seems too strong. It is in a crowded field so the spectrum may be a blend. We tentatively classify it as a mid-B-type supergiant. Fe II and [Fe II] emission lines are present, as well as
the WN nitrogen emission at $\lambda$ 4630-4670{\AA}. He I $\lambda$ 5876{\AA}, H$\beta$, the [O III] nebular lines and the Fe II emission lines have double or split emission profiles. However, the nebular [N II] and [S II] lines in the red plus H$\alpha$ do not show the
split profiles.
The catalog color and magnitude for 9490$\_$a1$\_$7093 are $(B-V)$ = 0.31 and $V$ = 20.20, respectively. 9490$\_$a1$\_$7093 is located in a very crowded region (Figure A28) which the lower resolution of the LBT cannot resolve. Consequently, we do not have information on its variability. Since we were unable to assign a precise spectral type to 9490$\_$a1$\_$7093, we estimate the likely extinction for a mid-B type supergiant,
A$_{V}$ = 1.3 mag. This may seem high but 9490$\_$a1$\_$7093 is embedded in a region of intense star formation.
\textit{B162 (B8: I)} was identified as a blue supergiant in M101 by \cite{Sandage:1983}. Followup spectroscopy by \cite{Humphreys:1987} confirmed its membership,
They estimated its spectral type to be late B to early A, and suggested that B162 may be a composite based on the width of the Balmer lines. Our spectrum of B162 (Figure~\ref{figHotSp}) is one of the few without any nebular contamination. Based on the He I $\lambda$4471 and Mg II $\lambda$4481 absorption lines, we suggest a spectral type of B8; the ratio of Si III $\lambda$4552 to He I $\lambda$4387, as well as the presence of the high luminosity indicator O I $\lambda$7774, confirms that B162 is a supergiant.
The catalog photometry for B162 indicates it is extremely luminous with a
$V$-band magnitude of $V$ = 19.52. As a result, B162 is saturated in the LBT images thus preventing us from assessing its variability. \cite{Sandage:1983} found no evidence for variability. The observed color for B162 is $(B-V)$ = 0.09 which is only 0.1 magnitudes redder than expected for its spectral type. Correcting for extinction, its M$_{v}$ is -9.9 mag and with the bolometric correction for
a late B-type supergiant, we estimate the bolometric magnitude for B162 to be $M_{bol}$ = -10.4. The Balmer lines seem too strong however for such a high luminosity star. It may be a composite or blend of more than one star. See Figure A18, where the object appears to be an unresolved small group of 2 - 3 stars.
Three of the stars described in this subsection have double emission profiles in the nebular and hydrogen emission lines. We find that this is the case for several stars in this
study. Since the stars are in crowded regions with strong
nebular emission, the double features may be due to emission from the two sides of these large H II regions or from more than one emission region along the line of sight.
However in the case of 9490$\_$a1$\_$7093 described above, the Fe II emission lines which presumably arise in the stellar wind, also show the split profiles. For this star the velocity separation of the Fe II peaks is 180 km s$^{-1}$ which corresponds to a
possible velocity of expansion of $\approx$ 90 km s$^{-1}$.
The spectral types, catalog photometry, visual extinction, and other notes regarding
the remaining hot or early-type supergiants are given in Table~\ref{tab:spec_members}.
\begin{figure}
\figurenum{3}
\epsscale{1.0}
\plotone{Fig.3.eps}
\caption{Spectra of selected early-type supergiants. The spectra are flux calibr
ated and smoothed with a 3 box smooth in the {\it splot} task in IRAF.}
\label{figHotSp}
\end{figure}
\subsection{The Intermediate-Type Supergiants}
The intermediate supergiant group includes the visually most luminous A- to F-type
stars. The intermediate or yellow supergiants, often have strong emission due to stellar winds and mass loss, but due to the degree of nebular contamination in most of these spectra, a stellar origin is uncertain in most cases. Here we discuss some representative and interesting stars in this group.
The spectrum of \textit{9492$\_$14$\_$8847 (F5 I)}, in Figure~\ref{figIMSp}, shows
strong Ca II H and K lines and the luminosity sensitive Fe II/Ti II blends at $\lambda\lambda$4172-4179. The presence of a weak G-band indicates a spectral type later than $\approx$F2. We estimate 9492$\_$14$\_$8847 to be approximately F5 based on the absorption lines of Ca I $\lambda$4226, Fe I $\lambda$4046 and $\lambda$4383 lines, and Mn I $\lambda\lambda$4032. We were not able to use the Balmer lines in the classification due to strong nebular contamination.
The $V$-band light curve for 9492$\_$14$\_$8847 (Figure~\ref{figSpecLC}) shows only
minor variability on the order of $\approx$0.1 magnitudes in amplitude. The catalog photometry for 9492$\_$14$\_$8847 is $V$ = 19.69 and $(B-V)$ = 0.38. The observed color is only marginally redder than expected, A$_{v}$ = 0.2 and M$_{v}$ is -9.5 mag. Adopting the bolometric correction for an F5 supergiant \citep[BC = 0.18;][]{Flower:1977, Flower:1996}, its bolometric luminosity of 9492$\_$14$\_$8847 is $M_{bol}$ = -9.3. Furthermore, the \textit{HST}/ACS $V$ image shows that 9492$\_$14$\_$8847 is on the periphery of a star-forming region (Figure A2) but appears to be a single point source. Thus, we conclude that 9492$\_$14$\_$8847 is an intermediate supergiant which occupies the same part of the HR diagram as the yellow supergiants in M31 and M33 \citep{Humphreys:2014}.
The low S/N spectrum of \textit{9492$\_$14$\_$14450 (Early A I)} in Figure~\ref{figIMSp} shows emission lines of Fe II and [Fe II] and strong H$\alpha$ and H$\beta$ emission with broad wings
asymmetric to the red, indicative of Thompson scattering and the presence of a stellar
wind. The relative strength of He I $\lambda$4471 and Mg II $\lambda$4481, suggest
an early A spectral type. The [O III] lines and He I $\lambda$5876 are double, and $\lambda$5876 also has a P Cyg profile. While H$\beta$ and H$\gamma$ are not clearly
double-peaked, they are both asymmetric to the red.
Based on the catalog photometry, 9492$\_$14$\_$14450 had an apparent magnitude of $V$ = 19.74 and an observed color of $(B-V)$ = 0.34 in January 2003. The multi-epoch photometry from the LBT shows variability on the order of $\approx$0.4 magnitudes (Figure~\ref{figSpecLC}) with a maximum of $V$ = 19.95 in March 2009 (MJD 54912). 9492$\_$14$\_$14450 is located in a very crowded, star forming region (Figure A3), and based on its observed color has relatively high interstellar extinction, A$_{v}$ = 0.9 mag, assuming an A2 spectral type. M$_{v}$ is $\approx$ -10.2 mag and M$_{bol}$ is -10.3. Thus 9492$\_$14$\_$14450 has several characteristics of a stellar wind and given its high luminosity based on its catalog
photometry, it qualifies as a warm hypergiant star possibly similar to those in M31 and M33 \citep{Humphreys:2013}.
\textit{9490$\_$03$\_$6943} has an early to mid-A-type spectrum..
It is one of the few targets with no nebular contamination (Figure~\ref{figIMSp}). Its strong H$\alpha$
emission line with very broad wings and P Cygni absorption is thus circumstellar.
It is relatively isolated (Figure A15) and appears to be a single star.The catalog
photometry is not contaminated and gives rather low visual extinction for a mid
A spectral type ($\sim$ A2-A5) and M$_{v}$ = -9.0.
The catalog photometry, visual extinction, spectral types, and any other notes regarding the remaining intermediate-type supergiants are given in Table~\ref{tab:spec_members}.
\begin{figure}
\figurenum{4}
\epsscale{1.0}
\plotone{Fig.4.eps}
\caption{Spectra of selected intermediate-type supergiants.The spectra are flux
calibrated and smoothed with a 3 box smooth in the {\it splot} task in IRAF.}
\label{figIMSp}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure}
\figurenum{5}
\epsscale{1.0}
\plotone{Fig.5.eps}
\caption{Spectra of the two emission line stars.The spectra are flux calibrated
and smoothed with a 3 box smooth in the {\it splot} task in IRAF.}
\label{figEM}
\end{figure}
\subsection{Emission-Line Sources}
The emission-line stars have a blue continuum and strong emission lines. The distinction between targets in this group and the hot supergiants is the lack of absorption features permitting the estimation of a spectral type. There are only three stars in
this group and one appears to be an H II region.
The spectrum of \textit{9490$\_$a3$\_$10940(Of/WN)} is dominated by strong H and He I emission as well as the broad N III and N II emission features seen in WN stars (Figure~\ref{figEM}). Some of the weaker emission lines include He II $\lambda$4686, O II $\lambda\lambda$4070-4076, and Fe II. Based on its spectral features, 9490$\_$a3$\_$10940 is an Of/WN star. The catalog magnitude for 9490$\_$a3$\_$10940 is $V = 21.49$ which is much fainter than our cutoff of $V \lesssim 20.5$ based on HLA photometry. Inspection of the $V$-band ACS image (Figure A7) shows that 9490$\_$a3$\_$10940 is in a crowded
region and the HLA aperture photometry is contaminated by nearby stars. The observed color is $(B-V) = -0.06$ which is approximately 0.2 magnitudes redder than we would expect for a star as hot as 9490$\_$a3$\_$10940. Though we do not have a precise spectral type for 9490$\_$a3$\_$10940, adopting $(B-V)$ $\approx$ -0.3 mag, which is typical for hot O-type stars, the extinction towards 9490$\_$a3$\_$10940 is roughly 0.7-0.8 magnitudes and M$_{v}$ is -8.3 mag. Correcting for extinction and adopting a bolometric correction of -3.0, we estimate the bolometric luminosity to be M$_{bol} \approx -11.3$.
\textit{9490$\_$b1$\_$3762} is in the giant star-forming complex NGC 5461 (Figure A30) and many of the emission features in its spectrum (Figure ~\ref{figEM})
are nebular. Despite the strong nebular contamination, the H$\alpha$ and H$\beta$ line profiles have very broad wings suggesting a strong stellar wind. We also
identify He I, C III $\lambda\lambda$4647-4652, and C IV $\lambda$4658 weak absorption lines indicating an underlying hot star.Emission lines of [S II] Fe II, [Fe II], and [Fe III] and broad WN nitrogen emission region from from 4620 - 4720{\AA} are present. As in several other stars, H$\beta$, the [O III] lines and He I $\lambda$5876 have split emission profiles.
The catalog photometry for 9490$\_$b1$\_$3762 gives $V$ = 22.13 and $(B-V)$ = 0.23. The emission lines from the highly-ionized species we see in the spectrum can only be produced by the radiation from an OB-type star with $(B-V) <$ 0.
Since the observed color is much redder than we expect for an OB-type star, it is likely that 9490$\_$b1$\_$3762 is highly reddened or a blend of objects. Since it is in such a highly crowded region (Figure A30) we cannot determine its variability from the LBT images.
The low S/N spectrum of \textit{B4} \citep{Sandage:1983} has the emission line spectrum of an H II region. H$\beta$, He I $\lambda$5876, and the [O III] lines show split or
double profiles.
\subsection{Candidate LBVs}
A census of variable stars in M101 was first conducted by \cite{Sandage:1974c} who identified nine irregular blue variables (V1 - V9). Subsequent photometric studies confirmed the variable nature of V1 and V2, and added a tenth star \citep[V10;][]{Sandage:1983}. Fifty-year historical light curves for the candidate LBVs V1, V2, and V10 are presented in \cite{Sandage:1983}. V3 through V9 are known to be variable, and are considered to be candiate LBVs, but lack historical light curves. Here we present the light curves and spectra for V2, V4, and V9. We have also identified an additional
candidate LBV, 9492$\_$14$\_$11998.
The spectrum of \textit{9492$\_$14$\_$11998} shown in Figure~\ref{figLBV} is dominated by Balmer and He I emission lines with strong P-Cygni profiles. The line profiles of H$\alpha$ and H$\beta$ have very broad wings and are asymmetric to the red, a feature characteristic of Thompson scattering. We estimate a wind velocity of $369\pm9$ km s$^{-1}$ from the P Cygni absorption component in the hydrogen and He I emission lines. This is somewhat higher than the wind velocities of the M31 and M33 LBVs measured the same way \citep{Humphreys:2014}, but on the low end for normal OB supergiants \citep{Crowther:2006, Mokiem:2007}. Weak Fe II emission is also present. We also identify absorption lines of He I at $\lambda\lambda$4009,4026,4121 and 4144{\AA}, and Si II at $\lambda$4128-31{\AA} typical of an early B2-B3-type supergiant
The $V$-band light curve for 9492$\_$14$\_$11998 in Figure~\ref{figSpecLC} shows that the star has steadily increased in brightness by approximately 0.2 magnitudes over the last 4 years. The spectrum for 9492$\_$14$\_$11998 was obtained at its current visual maximum of 18.9 mag. The catalog photometry, which was observed in January 2003, indicates that 9492$\_$14$\_$11998 had a significantly fainter apparent magnitude ($V$ = 19.40) than its present value. Its observed color in 2003 was $(B-V)$ = 0.19 and based on our LBT photometry, it has not changed.
If we assume an intrinsic color of $(B-V)_{0} \approx -0.1$ corresponding to a mid-B-type supergiant \citep{Flower:1977, Flower:1996} and a Galactic extinction curve, the visual extinction is $A_{V} \approx 0.9$ magnitudes. Correcting the \textit{HST}/ACS visual magnitude for this extinction, 9492$\_$14$\_$11998 has an absolute visual magnitude of $M_{V} = -10.55$ magnitudes. Adopting the bolometric correction (BC) for a mid-B supergiant \citep[BC $\approx$ -1.05;][]{Flower:1977, Flower:1996}, 9492$\_$14$\_$11998 has a high bolometric luminosity of $M_{bol}$ = -11.6, but inspection of the \textit{HST}/ACS $V$ image (Figure A1) shows that it is in a crowded region and the photometry is likely contaminated by neighboring stars. Despite the photometric uncertainties introduced by crowding, the spectral features of 9492$\_$14$\_$11998 are similar to an LBV in quiescence. Continued monitoring will be necessary to determine whether or not 9492$\_$14$\_$11998 is an LBV.
\textit{V2} is one of the three previously identified LBV candidates in M101 \citep{Sandage:1983}. \cite{Humphreys:1987} describe its spectrum as having H$\alpha$, H$\beta$, [O II] $\lambda$3727, and Fe II in emission. Our higher S/N spectrum confirms the described features and reveals broad-winged H$\alpha$ and H$\beta$ emission lines, as well as [N II], and [S II] in emission in the red. H$\beta$ and the Fe II
emission lines redward of H$\beta$ have split-emission-line profiles. These characteristics along with the fact that there is no [O III] $\lambda$4959 and $\lambda$5007 in emission suggests that the [N II], and [S II] lines may originate in the circumstellar environment rather than a nearby H\,{\small II} region. Furthermore, the \textit{HST}/ACS $V$-band image (Figure A29) shows that V2 is a single star and there is no indication of an H\,{\small II} region within the fiber.
The 50-year historical light curve for V2 is shown in \cite{Sandage:1983}. Over the 50 years it was monitored, V2 faded from $V \approx 19.1$ in 1910 to $V \approx 20.3$ in 1960. Our 4.5-year $V$-band light curve (Figure~\ref{figSpecLC}) indicates that V2 is increasing in brightness from $V$ = 20.6 in 2008 to $V$ = 20.25 in 2013. The current spectrum shows V2 to be a hot star and, therefore, in quiescence if it is an LBV.
The spectrum of \textit{V4} is shown in Figure~\ref{figLBV} and is fairly noisy despite smoothing. It is dominated by strong H, He I, [N II], and [S II] emission lines. The spectrum of V4 also shows Fe II emission throughout, although the lines are not particularly strong.
Although V4 was originally identified as a variable star in M101, \citep{Sandage:1974c},
there is no historical light curve. The LBT light curve for V4 displays variability with
an amplitude of approximately 0.4 magnitudes in the $V$-band (Figure~\ref{figSpecLC}) with a maximum magnitude of $V$ = 21.9. The catalog photometry from observations obtained in 2003 show V4 to be at $V$ = 22.0. \cite{Sandage:1974c} list the visual minimum and maximum for V4 to be $V$ = 22.2 and $V$ = 19.9, respectively. Assuming their photometry to be accurate, V4 is currently at its visual minimum and the oscillations we see are likely the low-amplitude variations commonly superposed on the longer time scale LBV minima and maxima.
The spectrum of \textit{V9} in Figure~\ref{figLBV} shows strong Balmer emission. The H$\beta$ and H$\alpha$ lines have broad, asymmetric wings indicating a strong stellar wind. We do not see any indication of P-Cygni profiles, however, this could be due to the large amount of nebular contamination filling in the absorption lines.
Absorption lines of Fe II, Mg II $\lambda$4481, and the Ca II K-line are present.
The luminosity sensitive O I $\lambda$ 7774 in intermediate type stars is also present.
V9 is located on the periphery of a large star-forming complex which is not within the \textit{HST}/ACS footprint. However, we have examined the LBT images (Figure A4) and although the complex is not resolved, V9 is located far enough away that its spectrum and photometry should not be seriously contaminated, and it is unlikely that the spectrum is a blend
The LBT $V$-band light curve for V9 indicates that the star has increased in visual brightness by approximately 0.8 magnitudes over the last 4 years from $V$ = 20.2 in 2008 to $V$ = 19.6 in 2012. The most recent data suggest V9 may be fading again.
Similar to V4, V9 was originally identified as a variable star in M101
\citep{Sandage:1974c} with similar
minima and maxima: $V_{min}$ = 20.3 (1950) and $V_{max}$ = 19.5 (1927/1947). When the Hectospec spectrum was observed, V9 was near its visual maximim based on the LBT light
curve (Figure~\ref{figSpecLC}). Although dominated by a strong continuum and Balmer emission, its spectrum suggests that the underlying star was an early A-type supergiant and therefore
may be an LBV in its optically thick wind or visual maximum state. Given its spectrum and variability history, it is very likely that V9 is an LBV.
\begin{figure}
\figurenum{6}
\epsscale{1.0}
\plotone{Fig.6.eps}
\caption{Spectra of the four LBV candidates. The spectra are flux calibrated and
smoothed with a 3 box smooth in the {\it splot} task in IRAF.}
\label{figLBV}
\end{figure}
\section{The Variables Without Spectra}
In this section, we discuss the light curves for the targets without spectra that met our criterion for variability. We separate the variables by their photometry into three groups: hot or early-type (O$-$B), intermediate (A$-$F), and cool (G$-$M) stars. Assuming zero reddening, the selection criteria for our groups corresponds to $(B-V) < 0$, $0 < (B-V) < 0.9$, and $(B-V) > 0.9$, respectively. Based on the our estimates of A$_{V}$ for our spectroscopically confirmed members (Table~\ref{tab:spec_members}), the majority of the stars are likely to be at least somewhat reddened. Therefore, we have relaxed our selection criteria to: hot [$(B-V) \leq 0.2$], intermediate [$0.2 < (B-V) < 1.0$], and cool [$(B-V) > 1.0$]. When available, we used the \textit{HST}/ACS catalog
photometry to assign the stars to the three groups. For targets that were not recovered in the catalog, we used the LBT photometry, although the LBT colors are unlikely to be precise in crowded regions.
We have LBT spectra for many of the stars in this section. When the improved
reduction pipeline is complete, we will discuss the spectra along with
their light curves in a future paper.
\begin{figure}
\figurenum{7}
\epsscale{0.6}
\plotone{Fig.7.eps}
\caption{The $V$-band light curves for the early-type variables (i.e. targets t
hat meet our criterion for variability
and have $(B-V) \leq 0.2$). The x-axis grid lines represent 365 days.}
\label{figBlueLC}
\end{figure}
\subsection{Early-Type Variables}
Figure~\ref{figBlueLC} shows the $V$-band light curves for the eight early-type variables. The majority have photometric variability on the order of a few tenths of a magnitude. Two of the stars, 9492$\_$10$\_$SF89 and 9492$\_$12$\_$961, show changes in $V$-band that are $\approx$1 magnitude. In both cases, the stars are fading. In 2003, they had $V$-band magnitudes of $V$ = 21.22 and $V$ = 20.94, respectively, measured from the \textit{HST}/ACS images. In March 2008, the LBT $V$-band magnitudes did not differ by more than a tenth of a magnitude compared to 2003. Though we do not have data between 2003 and 2008, the similarities suggest that their decline in brightness may be a recent development or alternatively the stars may be semi-periodic. Given their photometric colors and variability, 9492$\_$10$\_$SF89 and 9492$\_$12$\_$961 may also be LBVs. Spectral analysis and photometric monitoring will be necessary for confirmation.
\subsection{Intermediate-Type Variables}
The $V$-band light curves for the six variables with $0.2 < (B-V) \leq 1.0$ are shown in Figure~\ref{figImLC}. Our color criteria for the intermediate group could include supergiant Cepheids. To ensure that we have not re-identified any known Cepheids, we have cross-referenced the astrometry of the intermediate variables with the \cite{Shappee:2011} catalog of M101 Cepheids and removed any matches.
The intermediate-type variables have photometric properties that overlap with the intermediate type supergiants and with LBVs at maximum light \citep{Humphreys:1994}. It is typical for A to F supergiants to exhibit variability on the order $0.1-0.2$ magnitudes known as $\alpha$ Cygni variability \citep{van-Genderen:2002}. LBVs can also exhibit $\alpha$ Cygni variability, during an extended maximum, but with a higher amplitude \citep[$\pm0.5$ magnitudes;][]{van-Genderen:1997a, van-Genderen:1997b}. The variables presented here primarily exhibit $\alpha$ Cygni variability typical of intermediate-type supergiants.
However, 9492$\_$13$\_$6986 and 9492$\_$13$\_$11163 show larger amplitude variability
on the order of $\approx$0.5 magnitudes. Furthermore, 9492$\_$13$\_$11163 was brighter by 0.5 magnitudes in January 2003 from the \textit{HST}/ACS catalog photometry compared with the March 2008 LBT $V$-band magnitude. Without a spectrum, we cannot say with any
certainty that
these stars are not typical intermediate-type supergiants, however, their variability suggests they could be LBVs. Followup observations will be necessary for confirmation.
\begin{figure}
\figurenum{8}
\epsscale{0.6}
\plotone{Fig.8.eps}
\caption{The $V$-band light curves for the intermediate-type variables (i.e. ta
rgets that meet our criterio
n for variability and have $0.2 < (B-V) \leq 1.0$). The x-axis grid lines repre
sent 365 days.}
\label{figImLC}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure}
\figurenum{9}
\epsscale{0.6}
\plotone{Fig.9.eps}
\caption{The $V$-band light curves for the cool variables (i.e. targets that mee
t our criterion for variability and have $(B-V) > 1.0$). The x-axis grid lines represent 365 days.}
\label{figRedLC}
\end{figure}
\subsection{Cool Variables}
Finally, we present the $V$-band light curves (Figure \ref{figRedLC}) for the six stars which meet our variability criterion and have $(B-V) > 1.0$. This group very likely includes red supergiants and foreground K and M dwarfs. The stars in this group exhibit variability in the $V$-band that is $0.2-0.4$ magnitudes in amplitude which is typical of K and M supergiants \citep[and references therein]{Meynet:2011}, but based on the analysis of \cite{Grammer:2013a}, it is likely that a large fraction of the cool variables are foreground. We present the light curves here, but defer the analysis to a future paper which will include the spectra.
\section{Summary and Future Work}
\begin{figure}
\figurenum{10}
\epsscale{0.8}
\plotone{Fig.10.eps}
\caption{The color-magnitude diagram from Paper I showing the confirmed members
, the LBVs, and the LBT targets. Confirmed non-memebers have
been removed.}
\label{figCMD}
\end{figure}
In this third paper on our survey of the massive star population in M101, we present
the results of spectral classification and multicolor photometry of 50 of the
visually brightest stars in the field and confirm that 31 are members of M101.
It is not
surprising that the majority are intermediate-type supergiants with A to F-type
spectra since we selected the targets based on their visual apparent
magnitude and variability. We present new photometry and light curves for three
candidate LBVs, V2, V4 and V9 and identify a new candidate, 9492$\_$14$\_$11998.
Their spectra and variability confirm that they are LBV candidates and V9 may be in
an LBV-like maximum light state or eruption. Followup spectra and continued
photometric monitoring of these candidates will be necessary for confirmation
and to determine the nature of their observed variability.
We also discuss the light curves of 20 variables that lack spectroscopy.
Four of these stars with large amplitude variability may be LBV candidates.
Figure 10 shows the observed color-magnitude diagram from Paper I
with the confirmed members identified. The LBV candidates and the targets
observe with the LBT are identified separately and the non-members have been removed.
Forty-six additional stars have been observed with the LBT/MODS.
When the LBT/MODS reduction pipeline is completed, the addition of these stars including many of the variables will allow a more complete sampling of
the upper HR Diagram in M101.
\acknowledgements
Research by R. Humphreys and S. Grammer on massive stars is supported by
the National Science Foundation grant AST-1109394. Based on observations made
with the NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope, and obtained from the Hubble Legacy Archive, which is a collaboration between the Space Telescope Science Institute (STScI/NASA), the Space Telescope European Coordinating Facility (ST-ECF/ESA) and the Canadian Astronomy Data Centre (CADC/NRC/CSA).
{\it Facilities:} \facility{MMT/Hectospec, LBT/LBC, HST/ACS}
|
\section{Introduction}
The Shannon entropy of a discrete distribution, defined by
\begin{equation}\label{eqn.entropy}
H(P) \triangleq \sum_{i = 1}^S p_i \ln \frac{1}{p_i},
\end{equation}
emerged in Shannon's 1948 masterpiece~\cite{Shannon1948} in the answers to the most fundamental questions of compression and communication. In addition to its prominent roles in information theory, Shannon entropy has been widely applied in such disciplines as genetics~\cite{Olsen--Meyer--Bontempi2009impact}, image processing~\cite{Pluim--Maintz--Viergever2003mutual}, computer vision~\cite{Viola--Wells1997alignment}, secrecy~\cite{Batina--Gierlichs--Prouff--Rivain--Standaert--Veyrat2011mutual}, ecology~\cite{Hill1973diversity}, and physics~\cite{Franchini--Its--Korepin2008Renyi}. In most real-world applications, the true distribution underlying the generation of the data is unknown, making it impossible for us to compute the Shannon entropy exactly. Hence, in nearly every practical problem involving Shannon entropy, we need to estimate it from data.
Classical theory is mainly concerned with the case where the number of i.i.d.\ samples $n\to \infty$, while the alphabet size $S$ is fixed. In that scenario, the maximum likelihood estimator (MLE), which plugs in the empirical distribution into the definition of entropy, is \emph{asymptotically efficient} \cite[Thm. 8.11, Lemma 8.14]{Vandervaart2000} in the sense of the H\'ajek convolution theorem \cite{Hajek1970characterization} and the H\'ajek--Le Cam local asymptotic minimax theorem \cite{Hajek1972local}. In contrast, various modern data-analytic applications deal with datasets which do not fall into the regime of fixed $S$ and $n\to \infty$. In fact, in many applications the alphabet size $S$ is comparable to or even larger than the number of samples $n$. Indeed, the Wikipedia page on the Chinese characters shows that the alphabet of the Chinese language is at least $80,000$ characters large. As another case in point, half of the words in the Shakespearean canon appeared only once~\cite{Efron--Thisted1976}.
The problem of entropy estimation in the large alphabet regime (or non-asymptotic analysis) has been investigated extensively in various disciplines. We refer to~\cite{Jiao--Venkat--Han--Weissman2014minimax} for a thorough review. One recent breakthrough in this direction came from Valiant and Valiant~\cite{Valiant--Valiant2011}, who constructed the first explicit entropy estimator of sample complexity $n \asymp \frac{S}{\ln S}$, which they also proved to be necessary. On the other hand, it was shown in \cite{Paninski2003}\cite{Jiao--Venkat--Han--Weissman2014MLEnew} that the MLE requires $n \asymp S$ samples, implying that MLE is strictly sub-optimal in terms of sample complexity.
However, the aforementioned estimators have not been shown to achieve the minimax $L_2$ rates. In light of this, Jiao et al.\cite{Jiao--Venkat--Han--Weissman2014minimax}, and Wu and Yang in \cite{Wu--Yang2014minimax} independently developed schemes based on approximation theory, and obtained the minimax $L_2$ convergence rates for the entropy. Further, Jiao et al.\cite{Jiao--Venkat--Han--Weissman2014minimax} proposed a general methodology for estimating functionals, and showed that for a wide class of functionals (including entropy and mutual information), their methodology yields minimax rate-optimal estimators whose performance with $n$ samples is commensurate with that of the MLE with $n\ln n$ samples. They also obtained minimax $L_2$ rates for estimating a large class of functionals. On the practical side, Jiao et al.\cite{Jiao--Venkat--Han--Weissman2014beyond} showed that the minimax rate-optimal estimators introduced in~\cite{Jiao--Venkat--Han--Weissman2014minimax} can lead to consistent and substantial performance boosts in various machine learning applications. It was argued in~\cite{Jiao--Venkat--Han--Weissman2014minimax} that the ``only'' approach that can achieve the minimax rates for entropy must either implicitly or explicitly conduct best polynomial approximation as~\cite{Jiao--Venkat--Han--Weissman2014minimax} did. A question that arises naturally then is whether modifications of the plug-in approach, such as the Dirichlet prior smoothing ideas, can improve and result in something which does achieve the minimax rates. This paper answers this question negatively.
Dirichlet smoothing may have two connotations in the context of entropy estimation:
\begin{itemize}
\item \cite{Schurmann--Grassberger1996entropy,Schober2013some} One first obtains a Bayes estimate for the discrete distribution $P$, which we denote by $\hat{P}_B$, and then plugs it in the entropy functional to obtain the entropy estimate $H(\hat{P}_B)$.
\item \cite{Wolpert--Wolf1995,Holste--Grosse--Herzel1998bayes} One calculates the Bayes estimate for entropy $H(P)$ under Dirichlet prior for squared error. The estimator is the conditional expectation $\mathbb{E}[H(P)|\mathbf{X}]$, where $\mathbf{X}$ represents the samples.
\end{itemize}
We show in the present paper that neither approach results in improvements over the MLE in the large alphabet regime. Specifically, these approaches require at least $n\gg S$ to be consistent, while the minimax rate-optimal estimators such as the ones in~\cite{Jiao--Venkat--Han--Weissman2014minimax}\cite{Wu--Yang2014minimax} only need $n \gg \frac{S}{\ln S}$ to achieve consistency.
A main motivation for the present paper, beyond that discussed above, is to demonstrate the power of \emph{approximation theory using positive linear operators} for bounding the bias of plug-in estimators for functionals of parameters under arbitrary statistical models. It was first shown in Jiao et al.~\cite{Jiao--Venkat--Han--Weissman2014MLEnew} that under mild conditions, the problem of bias analysis of plug-in estimators for functionals from arbitrary finite dimensional statistical models is equivalent to approximation theory using positive linear operators, a subfield of approximation theory which has been developing for more than a century. Applying advanced tools from positive linear operator theory~\cite{Paltanea2004}, Jiao et al.~\cite{Jiao--Venkat--Han--Weissman2014MLEnew} obtained tight non-asymptotic characterizations of maximum $L_2$ risks for MLE in estimating a variety of functionals of probability distributions. In this paper, we contribute to the general positive linear operator theory~\cite{Paltanea2004}, and use the Dirichlet smoothing prior plug-in estimator as an example to demonstrate the efficacy of this general theory in dealing with analysis of the bias in estimation problems. We believe this connection has far reaching implications beyond analyzing bias in statistical estimation, which itself is an important problem.
\subsection{Dirichlet Smoothing}
The Dirichlet smoothing is widely used in practice to overcome the undersampling problem, i.e., one observes too few samples from a distribution $P$. The Dirichlet distribution with order $S\geq 2$ with parameters $\alpha_1,\ldots,\alpha_S>0$ has a probability density function with respect to Lebesgue measure on the Euclidean space $\mathbb{R}^{S-1}$ given by
\begin{equation}
f \left(x_1,\cdots, x_{S}; \alpha_1,\cdots, \alpha_S \right) = \frac{1}{\mathrm{B}(\boldsymbol\alpha)} \prod_{i=1}^S x_i^{\alpha_i - 1}
\end{equation}
on the open $S-1$-dimensional simplex defined by:
\begin{align}
&x_1, \cdots, x_{S-1} > 0 \\
&x_1 + \cdots + x_{S-1} < 1 \\
&x_S = 1 - x_1 - \cdots - x_{S-1}
\end{align}
and zero elsewhere. The normalizing constant is the multinomial Beta function, which can be expressed in terms of the Gamma function:
\begin{equation}
\mathrm{B}(\boldsymbol\alpha) = \frac{\prod_{i=1}^S \Gamma(\alpha_i)}{\Gamma\left(\sum_{i=1}^S \alpha_i\right)},\qquad\boldsymbol{\alpha}=(\alpha_1,\cdots,\alpha_S).
\end{equation}
Denote by $\mathcal{M}_S$ the set of discrete distributions supported on $S$ elements. Assuming the unknown distribution $P$ follows prior distribution $P \sim \text{Dir}(\boldsymbol\alpha)$, and we observe a vector $\mathbf{X} = (X_1,X_2,\ldots,X_S)$ with Multinomial distribution $\mathsf{Multi}(n;p_1,p_2,\ldots,p_S)$, then one can show that the posterior distribution $P_{P|\mathbf{X}}$ is also a Dirichlet distribution with parameters
\begin{equation}
{\boldsymbol\alpha} + \mathbf{X} = \left( \alpha_1 + X_1,\alpha_2 + X_2,\ldots,\alpha_K + X_K \right).
\end{equation}
Furthermore, the posterior mean (conditional expectation) of $p_i$ given $\mathbf{X}$ is given by~\cite[Example 5.4.4]{Lehmann--Casella1998theory}
\begin{equation}
\delta_i(\mathbf{X}) \triangleq \mathbb{E}[p_i|\mathbf{X}] = \frac{\alpha_i + X_i}{n + \sum_{i = 1}^S \alpha_i}.
\end{equation}
The estimator $\delta_i(\mathbf{X})$ is widely used in practice for various choices of $\mathbf{\alpha}$. For example, if $\alpha_i = \frac{\sqrt{n}}{S}$, then the corresponding $\left( \delta_1(\mathbf{X}),\delta_2(\mathbf{X}),\ldots,\delta_S(\mathbf{X})\right)$ is the minimax estimator for $P$ under squared loss~\cite[Example 5.4.5]{Lehmann--Casella1998theory}. However, it is no longer minimax under other loss functions such as $\ell_1$ loss, which was investigated in~\cite{Han--Jiao--Weissman2014minimaxdistribution}.
Note that the estimator $\delta_i(\mathbf{X})$ subsumes the MLE $\hat{p}_i = \frac{X_i}{n}$ as a special case, since we can take the limit $\boldsymbol\alpha\to 0$ for $\delta_i(\mathbf{X})$ to obtain MLE.
The Dirichlet prior smoothed distribution estimate is denoted as $\hat{P}_B$, where
\begin{equation}
\hat{P}_B = \frac{n}{n + \sum_{i = 1}^S \alpha_i} P_n + \frac{\sum_{i = 1}^S \alpha_i}{n+\sum_{i = 1}^S \alpha_i} \frac{\boldsymbol\alpha}{\sum_{i = 1}^S \alpha_i}.
\end{equation}
Note that the \emph{smoothed} distribution $\hat{P}_B$ can be viewed as a convex combination of the empirical distribution $P_n$ and the \emph{prior} distribution $\frac{\boldsymbol\alpha}{\sum_{i = 1}^S \alpha_i}$. We call the estimator $H(\hat{P}_B)$ the \emph{Dirichlet prior smoothed plug-in estimator}.
Another way to apply Dirichlet prior in entropy estimation is to compute the Bayes estimator for $H(P)$ under squared error, given that $P$ follows Dirichlet prior. It is well known that the Bayes estimator under squared error is the conditional expectation. It was shown in Wolpert and Wolf~\cite{Wolpert--Wolf1995} that
\begin{equation}\label{eqn.bayesestimator}
\hat{H}^{\mathsf{Bayes}} \triangleq \mathbb{E}[H(P)|\mathbf{X}] = \psi\left( \sum_{i = 1}^S (\alpha_i + X_i)+1\right) - \sum_{i = 1}^S \left( \frac{\alpha_i + X_i}{\sum_{i = 1}^S (\alpha_i + X_i)} \right) \psi(\alpha_i + X_i + 1),
\end{equation}
where $\psi(z) \triangleq \frac{\Gamma'(z)}{\Gamma(z)}$ is the digamma function. We call the estimator $\hat{H}^{\mathsf{Bayes}}$ the \emph{Bayes estimator under Dirichlet prior}.
\subsection{Non-asymptotic analysis of $L_2$ risk}
We adopt the conventional statistical decision theoretic framework~\cite{Wald1950statistical} in analyzing the performance of any entropy estimator $\hat{H} = \hat{H}(\mathbf{X})$. Denote by $\mathcal{M}_S$ all discrete distributions with support size $S$. The $L_2$ risk of estimator $\hat{H}$ is defined as
\begin{equation}
\mathbb{E}_P \left( H(P) - \hat{H} \right)^2,
\end{equation}
where the expectation is taken with respect to the distribution $P$ that generates the observations used by $\hat{H}$. Apparently, the $L_2$ risk is a function of both the \emph{unknown} distribution $P$ and the estimator $\hat{H}$, and in order to obtain a single score that evaluates how well the estimator $\hat{H}$ in the worst possible case, we may want to adopt the minimax criterion~\cite{Wald1950statistical}\cite{Lehmann--Casella1998theory}, and evaluate the \emph{maximum risk}
\begin{equation}
\sup_{P\in \mathcal{M}_S} \mathbb{E}_P \left( H(P) - \hat{H} \right)^2.
\end{equation}
The $L_2$ risk can be decomposed into two parts: one is the bias, the other is the variance. They are defined by
\begin{align}
\mathsf{Bias}(\hat{H}) & \triangleq \mathbb{E} \hat{H} - H(P) \\
\mathsf{Var}(\hat{H}) & \triangleq \mathbb{E} \left( \hat{H} - \mathbb{E} \hat{H} \right)^2.
\end{align}
We have
\begin{equation}
\mathbb{E}_P \left( H(P) - \hat{H} \right)^2 = \left( \mathsf{Bias}(\hat{H}) \right)^2 + \mathsf{Var}(\hat{H}).
\end{equation}
The literature on concentration inequalities~\cite{Boucheron--Lugosi--Massart2013} provides us with effective techniques for controlling the variance, and we will show it suffices to apply the Efron--Stein inequality to obtain tight bounds on $\mathsf{Var}(H(\hat{P}_B))$. The focus of this paper is on bias analysis, rather than variance. How hard can it be to bound the bias?
The reader may be tempted to use the Taylor expansion to analyze the bias of $H(\hat{P}_B)$. Unfortunately, Taylor expansion cannot give satisfactory results for this problem. To demonstrate this point simply, let us try to apply Taylor expansion to analyze a special case of $H(\hat{P}_B)$, which is the MLE $H(P_n)$.
Considerable effort has been devoted to understanding the performance of the bias of MLE $H(P_n)$. One of the earliest investigations in this direction is due to Miller~\cite{Miller1955}, who applied the Taylor expansion and showed that, for any fixed distribution $P$,
\begin{equation}\label{eqn.miller}
\mathbb{E} H(P_n) = H(P) - \frac{S-1}{2n} + O\left(\frac{1}{n^2}\right).
\end{equation}
Equation~(\ref{eqn.miller}) was later refined by Harris~\cite{Harris1975} using higher order Taylor series expansions to yield
\begin{equation}\label{eqn.harris}
\mathbb{E} H(P_n) = H(P) - \frac{S-1}{2n} + \frac{1}{12 n^2} \left( 1- \sum_{i = 1}^S \frac{1}{p_i} \right) + O\left( \frac{1}{n^3} \right).
\end{equation}
Harris's result reveals an undesirable consequence of the Taylor expansion method: one cannot obtain uniform bounds on the bias of the MLE. Indeed, the term $\sum_{i = 1}^S \frac{1}{p_i}$ can be arbitrarily large for distributions sufficiently close to the boundary of the simplex of probabilities. However, it is evident that both $H(P_n)$ and $H(P)$ are bounded above by $\ln S$, since the entropy of any distribution supported on $S$ elements is upper bounded by $\ln S$. Conceivably, for such a distribution $P$ that would make $\sum_{i = 1}^S \frac{1}{p_i}$ very large, we need to compute even higher order Taylor expansions to obtain more accuracy, but even with such efforts we can never obtain a uniform bias bound for all $P$.
Harris's analysis demonstrates a severe limitation of the Taylor expansion method. The situation is even worse if we consider general functionals. Indeed, if we want to analyze the bias of the plug-in estimator $F(P_n)$ for $F(P)$, where $F(P)$ is an arbitrary functional of $P$, which may not be differentiable, Taylor expansion may not even be valid.
\subsection{Approximation theory using positive linear operators}
An operator $L$ defined on a linear space of functions, $V$, is called \emph{linear} if
\begin{equation}
L(\alpha f + \beta g) = \alpha L(f) + \beta L(g), \quad \text{for all }f,g\in V, \alpha,\beta \in \mathbb{R},
\end{equation}
and is called \emph{positive}, if
\begin{equation}
L(f)\geq 0\quad \text{for all }f\in V, f\geq 0.
\end{equation}
It was first shown in Jiao et al.~\cite{Jiao--Venkat--Han--Weissman2014MLEnew} that analyzing the bias of \emph{any} plug-in estimator for functionals of parameters from \emph{any} parametric families can be recast as a problem of approximation theory using positive linear operators~\cite{Paltanea2004}, which is a subarea of approximation theory. Paltanea~\cite{Paltanea2004} provides a comprehensive account of the state-of-the-art theory in this subject.
For a concrete example, the classical Bernstein operator $B_n(f)$ maps a continuous function $f\in C[0,1]$ to another continuous function $B_n(f)\in C[0,1]$ such that
\begin{equation}
B_n(f)(x) = \sum_{j = 0}^n f\left(\frac{j}{n}\right)\binom{n}{j} x^j(1-x)^{n-j},
\end{equation}
where $C[0,1]$ denotes the space of continuous functions on $[0,1]$. One can easily verify that this operator is positive and linear. Bernstein in 1912 showed that the function $B_n$ uniformly approximates any continuous function $f\in C[0,1]$. In other words,
\begin{equation}\label{eqn.bernsteincanapproximate}
\sup_{x\in [0,1]}|B_n(f)(x) - f(x)| \to 0,\quad n\to \infty.
\end{equation}
The function $B_n(f)(x)$ is called Bernstein polynomial. On the other hand, the operator $B_n(f)$ has a probabilistic interpretation: it can be interpreted as the expectation of random variable $f\left(\frac{X}{n}\right)$ where $X$ follows a Binomial distribution $X\sim \mathsf{B}(n,x)$. In other words, the uniform approximation property~(\ref{eqn.bernsteincanapproximate}) is equivalent to the fact that
\begin{equation}
\sup_{x\in [0,1]} \left| \mathbb{E}_x f\left(\frac{X}{n}\right) - f(x)\right| = \sup_{x\in [0,1]} \left | \mathsf{Bias}\left(f\left(\frac{X}{n}\right)\right) \right| \to 0,\quad n\to \infty,
\end{equation}
where the expectation is taken with respect to distribution $X\sim \mathsf{B}(n,x)$. Hence, the bias of the plug-in estimator $f(X/n)$ is precisely the approximation error of the Bernstein polynomial in approximating $f$. More generally, as Paltanea~\cite[Remark 1.1.2.]{Paltanea2004} argued using the Riesz--Markov--Kakutani representation theorem, positive linear operators of continuous functions can be ``essentially'' interpreted as the expectation of some plug-in estimator. Specifically, let $X$ be a locally compact Hausdorff space, such as $\mathbb{R}^n$. For any positive linear functional $L$ on $C_c(X)$, which denotes the space of continuous compactly supported real/complex valued functions on $X$, the Riesz--Markov--Kakutani representation theorem implies that there is a unique regular Borel measure $\mu$ on $X$ such that
\begin{equation}
L(f) = \int_X f(x)d\mu(x),
\end{equation}
for all $f\in C_c(X)$. Hence, if we assume the functional $L$ maps the indicator function over $X$ to the constant one, then the measure $\mu$ is a probability measure, implying that $L(f)$ can be interpreted as the expectation of a plug-in estimator that plugs-in an estimate of $x$ with distribution $\mu$ into the continuous function $f$.
The rest of the paper is organized as follows. Section~\ref{sec.mainresults} discusses the main results of this paper. Section~\ref{sec.applyapproximationtheory} develops new results in approximation theory, and applies them to analyze the bias of the Dirichlet prior smoothed plug-in estimator. Section~\ref{sec.varianceanalysis} presents a non-asymptotic upper bound on the variance of the Dirichlet prior smoothed plug-in estimator, and section~\ref{sec.prooflowerbound} proves the lower bound on the maximum risk of the Dirichlet prior smoothed plug-in estimator as well as the Bayes estimator under Dirichlet prior. The remaining proofs are deferred to the appendices.
\section{Main Results}\label{sec.mainresults}
For simplicity, we restrict attention to the case where the parameter $\boldsymbol\alpha$ in the Dirichlet distribution takes the form $(a,a,\ldots,a)$. We remark that for general $\boldsymbol\alpha$ the analysis goes through seamlessly to arrive at similar conclusions.
In comparison to MLE $H(P_n)$, where $P_n$ is the empirical distribution, the Dirichlet smoothing scheme $H(\hat{P}_B)$ has a disadvantage: it requires the knowledge of the alphabet size $S$ in general. We define
\begin{equation}
\hat{p}_{B,i} = \frac{n \hat{p}_i + a}{n + Sa},
\end{equation}
and
\begin{equation}
p_{B,i} = \mathbb{E}[\hat{p}_{B,i}] = \frac{np_i + a}{n+Sa}.
\end{equation}
Apparently,
\begin{equation}\label{eqn.Pbconstruction}
\hat{P}_B = \frac{n}{n+Sa} P_n + \frac{Sa}{n+Sa} \text{Uniform distribution},
\end{equation}
where $P_n$ stands for the empirical distribution. Analogously, we have
\begin{equation}
P_B = \frac{n}{n+Sa} P + \frac{Sa}{n+Sa} \text{Uniform distribution},
\end{equation}
where $P$ is the true distribution. Throughout, we adopt the following standard notations: $a_n\lesssim b_n$ means $\sup_n a_n/b_n <\infty$, $a_n \gtrsim b_n$ means $b_n\lesssim a_n$, $a_n \asymp b_n$ means $a_n\lesssim b_n$ and $a_n \gtrsim b_n$, or equivalently, there exist two universal positive constants $c,C$ such that
\begin{align}
0<c<\liminf_{n\to\infty} \frac{a_n}{b_n} \le \limsup_{n\to\infty} \frac{a_n}{b_n} < C<\infty.
\end{align}
The main results of this paper can now be stated as follows.
\begin{theorem}\label{thm.upperbound}
If $n\geq Sa$, then the maximum $L_2$ risk of $H(\hat{P}_B)$ in estimating $H(P)$ is upper bounded as
\begin{equation}
\sup_{P \in \mathcal{M}_S} \mathbb{E}_P \left( H(\hat{P}_B) - H(P)\right)^2 \leq \left( \ln\left(1+\frac{S-1}{n+Sa}\right) + \frac{2Sa}{n+Sa} \ln \left( \frac{n+Sa}{2a}\right) \right)^2 + \frac{2n}{(n+Sa)^2}\left[3+\ln\left(\frac{n+Sa}{a+1}\wedge S\right)\right]^2,
\end{equation}
where $a\wedge b = \min\{a,b\}$. Here the first term bounds the squared bias, and the second term bounds the variance.
\end{theorem}
The following corollary is immediate.
\begin{corollary}
If $n\gg S$ and $a$ is upper bounded by a constant, then the maximum $L_2$ risk of $H(\hat{P}_B)$ vanishes.
\end{corollary}
\begin{theorem}\label{thm.lowerbound}
If $n\ge\max\{15S,Sa\}$, then the maximum $L_2$ risk of $H(\hat{P}_B)$ in estimating $H(P)$ is lower bounded as
\begin{equation}
\sup_{P \in \mathcal{M}_S} \mathbb{E}_P \left( H(\hat{P}_B) - H(P)\right)^2 \geq \frac{1}{2}\left[\frac{(S-3)a}{4(n+Sa)}\ln \left( \frac{n+Sa}{a}\right) + \frac{S-1}{8n} + \frac{S^2}{80n^2} - \frac{1}{48n^2}\right]^2 + c \frac{\ln^2 S}{n},
\end{equation}
where $c>0$ is a universal constant that does not depend on $\hat{P}_B,P$.
If $n<Sa$, then we have
\begin{equation}
\sup_{P \in \mathcal{M}_S} \mathbb{E}_P \left( H(\hat{P}_B) - H(P)\right)^2 \geq \frac{\ln^2 S}{16}.
\end{equation}
If $n<15S$, then we have
\begin{equation}
\sup_{P \in \mathcal{M}_S} \mathbb{E}_P \left( H(\hat{P}_B) - H(P)\right)^2 \geq \left[\left( \frac{(S-3)a}{4(n+Sa)}\ln \left( \frac{n+Sa}{a}\right) + \frac{\lfloor n/15 \rfloor}{8n} - \frac{1}{16n} \right)_+ \right]^2,
\end{equation}
where $\lfloor x \rfloor$ is the largest integer that does not exceed $x$, and $(x)_+ = \max\{x,0\}$ represents the positive part of $x$.
\end{theorem}
We have the following corollary.
\begin{corollary}
If $n \lesssim S$, then the maximum $L_2$ risk of $H(\hat{P}_B)$ is bounded away from zero.
\end{corollary}
The case $a = 0$ corresponds to the analysis of MLE, which was conducted in~\cite{Jiao--Venkat--Han--Weissman2014MLEnew}. For the MLE, it was shown in~\cite{Jiao--Venkat--Han--Weissman2014MLEnew} that we have, for any $n$,
\begin{equation}
\sup_{P \in \mathcal{M}_S} \mathbb{E}_P \left( H(P_n) - H(P) \right)^2 \leq \left( \ln \left( 1+ \frac{S-1}{n} \right) \right)^2 + \left(\frac{(\ln n)^2}{n}\wedge \frac{2(\ln S + 2)^2}{n}\right).
\end{equation}
and if $n \geq 15S$,
\begin{equation}
\sup_{P \in \mathcal{M}_S} \mathbb{E}_P \left( H(P_n) - H(P) \right)^2 \geq \frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{S-1}{2n} + \frac{S^2}{20n^2} - \frac{1}{12n^2}\right)^2 + c \frac{\ln^2 S}{n},
\end{equation}
where $c>0$ is the same universal constant as in Theorem~\ref{thm.lowerbound}.
The next theorem presents a lower bound on the maximum risk of the Bayes estimator under Dirichlet prior. Since we have assumed that all $\alpha_i = a,1\leq i\leq S$, the Bayes estimator under Dirichlet prior is
\begin{equation}
\hat{H}^{\mathsf{Bayes}} = \psi(Sa +n + 1) - \sum_{i = 1}^S \frac{a + X_i}{Sa + n} \psi(a + X_i + 1).
\end{equation}
\begin{theorem}\label{thm.bayeslowerbound}
If $S \geq e(2n+1)$ and $n\geq Sa$, then
\begin{equation}
\sup_{P\in \mathcal{M}_S} \mathbb{E}_P \left( \hat{H}^{\mathsf{Bayes}} - H(P) \right)^2 \geq \left( \ln \left( \frac{S}{e(2n+1)} \right) \right)^2.
\end{equation}
If $n<Sa$, then
\begin{equation}
\sup_{P\in \mathcal{M}_S} \mathbb{E}_P \left( \hat{H}^{\mathsf{Bayes}} - H(P) \right)^2 \geq \left[ \left (\ln \left( \frac{Sa + n}{e(a+n+1)} \right)\right)_+ \right]^2.
\end{equation}
\end{theorem}
Evident from Theorem~\ref{thm.upperbound},~\ref{thm.lowerbound}, and~\ref{thm.bayeslowerbound} is the fact that in the best situation (i.e. $a$ not too large), both the Dirichlet prior smoothed plug-in estimator and the Bayes estimator under Dirichlet prior still require at least $n\gg S$ samples to be consistent, which is the same as MLE. In contrast, the minimax rate-optimal estimator in Jiao et al.~\cite{Jiao--Venkat--Han--Weissman2014minimax} is consistent if $n\gg \frac{S}{\ln S}$, which is the best possible rate for consistency. Thus, we can conclude that the Dirichlet smoothing technique does \emph{not} solve the entropy estimation problem. From an intuitive point of view it is also clear: both the Dirichlet prior smoothed plug-in estimator and the Bayes estimator under Dirichlet prior do not exploit the special properties of the entropy functional $p\ln(1/p)$, i.e. the functional has a nondifferentiable point at $p = 0$. The analysis in \cite{Jiao--Venkat--Han--Weissman2014minimax} demonstrates that the minimax rate-optimal estimator has to exploit the special structure of the entropy function.
\section{Approximation theory for bias analysis}\label{sec.applyapproximationtheory}
Denote by $e_j,j\in \mathbb{N}_+ \cup \{0\}$, the monomial functions $e_j(y) = y^j,y\in I$. For a linear positive functional $F$, we adopt the following notation
\begin{align}
B_F(x) = \left|F(e_1)-xF(e_0)\right|,\qquad V_F = F\left((e_1-F(e_1)e_0)^2\right),
\end{align}
which represent the ``bias'' and ``variance'' of a positive linear functional $F$. Define the first order and second order Ditzian--Totik modulus of smoothness~\cite{Ditzian--Totik1987} by
\begin{align}
\omega_1^\varphi(f,2h) &\triangleq \sup\left\{|f(u)-f(v)|:u,v\in[0,1],|u-v|\le 2h\varphi\left(\frac{u+v}{2}\right)\right\} \\
\omega_2^\varphi(f,h) &\triangleq \sup\left\{\left|f(u)-2f\left(\frac{u+v}{2}\right)+f(v)\right|:u,v\in[0,1],|u-v|\le 2h\varphi\left(\frac{u+v}{2}\right)\right\}.
\end{align}
\subsection{A contribution to approximation theory}
First we recall the following result, which is a direct corollary of \cite[Thm. 2.5.1]{Paltanea2004}.
\begin{lemma}\label{lemma_ori}
If $F: C[0,1]\to \mathbb{R}$ is a linear positive functional and $F(e_0)=1$, then we have
\begin{align}\label{eq:inequality1}
|F(f)-f(x)| \le \frac{B_F(x)}{2h_1\varphi(x)}\cdot \omega_1^\varphi(f,2h_1) + \frac{5}{2}\omega_2^\varphi(f,h_1),
\end{align}
for all $f\in C[0,1]$ and $0<h_1\le \frac{1}{2}$, where $\varphi(x)=\sqrt{x(1-x)}$ and $h_1=\sqrt{F\left((e_1-xe_0)^2\right)}/\varphi(x)=\sqrt{V_F+(B_F(x))^2}/\varphi(x)$.
\end{lemma}
We remark that Lemma \ref{lemma_ori} cannot yield the desired result for $f(p)=-p\ln p$ and
\begin{align}
F(f) = \sum_{k=0}^n f\left(\frac{k+a}{n+Sa}\right)\cdot \binom{n}{k}p^k(1-p)^{n-k}.
\end{align}
Specifically, it is easy to show that
\begin{align}
B_F(p) = \left|\frac{np+a}{n+Sa} - p\right| = \frac{|1-pS|a}{n+Sa},\qquad V_F = \frac{np(1-p)}{(n+Sa)^2}.
\end{align}
One can also easily show that $\omega_1^\varphi(f,2h) \asymp h$ for $f(x) = -x\ln x$. Regarding the second order Ditzian--Totik modulus of smoothness, the following lemma from~\cite{Jiao--Venkat--Han--Weissman2014MLEnew} gives a precise characterization.
\begin{lemma}\label{lemma.DT2ndentropy}
For $f(x) = -x\ln x, x\in [0,1]$, the second order Ditzian--Totik modulus of smoothness $\omega_2^\varphi(f,h)$ satisfies
\begin{equation}
\omega_2^\varphi(f,h) = \frac{h^2 \ln 4}{1+h^2}, \quad h\leq 1.
\end{equation}
\end{lemma}
Hence, when $x\to0$, we conclude that
\begin{align}
h_1 = \frac{\sqrt{V_F+(B_F(x))^2}}{\varphi(x)} \ge \frac{|B_F(x)|}{\varphi(x)} = \frac{a}{n+Sa}\cdot \frac{|1-xS|}{\sqrt{x(1-x)}}
\end{align}
is unbounded as $x\to 0$, thus does not satisfy the condition $h_1\le 1/2$. Thus, we cannot directly use the result of Lemma \ref{lemma_ori}.
It turns out that the general result in Lemma~\ref{lemma_ori} can be strictly improved in a general fashion. The result is given by the following lemma.
\begin{lemma}\label{lemma_mod}
If $F: C[0,1]\to \mathbb{R}$ is a linear positive functional and $F(e_0)=1$, then
\begin{align}\label{eq:inequality2}
|F(f)-f(x)| \le \omega_1(f,B_F(x);x) + \frac{5}{2}\omega_2^\varphi(f,h_2)
\end{align}
for all $f\in C[0,1]$ and $0<h_2\le \frac{1}{2}$, where $\varphi(x)=\sqrt{x(1-x)}$ and $h_2=\sqrt{V_F}/\varphi(x)$, and
\begin{align}
\omega_1(f,h;x) \triangleq \sup\left\{|f(u)-f(x)|:u\in[0,1],|u-x|\le h\right\}.
\end{align}
\end{lemma}
\begin{proof}
Applying Lemma \ref{lemma_ori} to $x=F(e_1)$ we have
\begin{align}
|F(f)-f(F(e_1))| \le \frac{5}{2}\omega_2^\varphi(f,h_2)
\end{align}
and then (\ref{eq:inequality2}) is the direct result of the triangle inequality $|F(f)-f(x)|\le |F(f)-f(F(e_1))| + |f(F(e_1))-f(x)|$.
\end{proof}
We show that Lemma \ref{lemma_mod} is indeed stronger than Lemma \ref{lemma_ori}. Firstly, due to $h_1\ge h_2$, we have $\omega_2^\varphi(f,h_2)\le \omega_2^\varphi(f,h_1)$. Second, for $x\le 1/2$, we have
\begin{align}
\frac{B_F(x)}{2h_1\varphi(x)}\cdot \omega_1^\varphi(f,2h_1)
&\approx \frac{B_F(x)}{2h_1\varphi(x)}\cdot \sup_{0\le s\le1}2h_1\varphi(s)f'(s)\\
&\ge B_F(x)\cdot \sup_{x\le s\le1-x}f'(s)\\
&\approx \sup_{x\le s\le 1-x}\omega_1(f,B_F(x);s)
\end{align}
which is almost the supremum of $\omega_1(f,|F(e_1-xe_0)|;s)$ over $s\in[x,1-x]$ and is no less than the pointwise result $\omega_1(f,|F(e_1-xe_0)|;x)$, and here we have used the inequality $\varphi(s)\ge\varphi(x)$ for $x\le s\le 1-x$. A similar argument also holds for $x>1/2$. Hence, Lemma \ref{lemma_mod} transforms the first order term from the norm result in Lemma~\ref{lemma_ori} to a pointwise result, which may exhibit great advantages when we applied it to specific problems.
\subsection{Application of the improved general bound to our problem}
\begin{theorem}\label{thm_2}
If $n\ge \max\{ Sa,4\}$, then
\begin{align}
\sup_{P\in\mathcal{M}_S}\mathbb{E}_P|H(\hat{P}_B) - H(P)| \le \frac{5nS\ln2}{(n+Sa)^2} + \frac{2Sa}{n+Sa}\ln\left(\frac{n+Sa}{2a}\right).
\end{align}
\end{theorem}
Note that Theorem~\ref{thm_2} implies a slightly weaker bias bound than Theorem~\ref{thm.upperbound}, but it is only sub-optimal up to a multiplicative constant. The bias bound in Theorem~\ref{thm.upperbound} is obtained using another technique which is tailored for the entropy function, and is presented in the appendix.
Now we give the proof of Theorem \ref{thm_2} using the approximation theoretic machinery we just established. Note that $h_2 = \frac{\sqrt{n}}{n+Sa}$. In order to ensure that $h_2 \leq 1/2$, it suffices to take $n\geq 4$.
In light of Lemma \ref{lemma_mod}, we have
\begin{align}
\mathbb{E}_P|H(\hat{P}_B) - H(P)| &\le \sum_{i=1}^S \left(\omega_1\left(f,\frac{|1-p_iS|a}{n+Sa};p_i\right) + \frac{5n\ln 2}{(n+Sa)^2}\right)\\
&\le -\left(\sum_{i=1}^S\frac{|1-p_iS|a}{n+Sa}\right)\ln\left(\frac{1}{S}\sum_{i=1}^S\frac{|1-p_iS|a}{n+Sa}\right) + \frac{5nS\ln2}{(n+Sa)^2}\\
&\le \frac{2Sa}{n+Sa}\ln\left(\frac{n+Sa}{2a}\right) + \frac{5nS\ln2}{(n+Sa)^2}
\end{align}
where we have used the fact that if $|x-y|\leq 1/2, x,y\in [0,1]$, then $|x\ln x - y\ln y|\leq -|x-y|\ln |x-y|$. The readers are referred to the proof of Cover and Thomas~\cite[Thm. 17.3.3]{Cover--Thomas2006} for details. We also utilized the fact that if $n\geq Sa$, then for any $i, 1\leq i\leq S$
\begin{align}
\frac{|1-p_iS|a}{n+Sa} \le \frac{Sa}{n+Sa} \le \frac{1}{2}.
\end{align}
\section{Variance Analysis}\label{sec.varianceanalysis}
The following theorem gives the variance bound in Theorem~\ref{thm.upperbound}.
\begin{theorem}
The variance of $H(\hat{P}_B)$ is upper bounded as follows:
\begin{align}
\mathsf{Var}\left(H(\hat{P}_B)\right) \le \frac{2n}{(n+Sa)^2}\left[3+\ln\left(\frac{n+Sa}{a+1}\wedge S\right)\right]^2.
\end{align}
\end{theorem}
\begin{proof}
We recall the following bounded differences inequality first.
\begin{lemma}
\cite[Cor. 3.2]{Boucheron--Lugosi--Massart2013} If function $f: \mathcal{Z}^n\to\mathbb{R}$ has the bounded differences property, i.e., for some non-negative constants $c_1,c_2,\cdots,c_n$,
\begin{align}
\sup_{z_1,z_2,\cdots,z_n,z_i'\in\mathcal{Z}} |f(z_1,z_2,\cdots,z_n) - f(z_1,\cdots,z_{i-1},z_i',z_{i+1},\cdots,z_n)| \le c_i, \qquad 1\le i\le n
\end{align}
then
\begin{align}
\mathsf{Var}\left(f(Z_1,Z_2,\cdots,Z_n)\right) \le \frac{1}{4}\sum_{i=1}^n c_i^2,
\end{align}
when $Z_1,Z_2,\cdots,Z_n$ are independent random variables.
\end{lemma}
In our case, apparently $F(\hat{P}_B)$ is a function of $n$ independent random variables $\{Z_i\}_{1\le i\le n}$ taking values in $\mathcal{Z}=\{1,2,\cdots,S\}$. Changing one location of the sample would make some symbol with count $j$ to have count $j+1$, and another symbol with count $i$ to have count $i-1$. Then the absolute value of the total change in the functional estimator is
\begin{align}
\left|f\left(\frac{j+1+a}{n+Sa}\right) - f\left(\frac{j+a}{n+Sa}\right) - f\left(\frac{i+a}{n+Sa}\right) + f\left(\frac{i-1+a}{n+Sa}\right)\right|
\le 2\max_{1\le k\le n} \left|f\left(\frac{k+a}{n+Sa}\right) - f\left(\frac{k-1+a}{n+Sa}\right)\right|.
\end{align}
In light of the Taylor expansion with integral form residue, we have that for $1\ge x\ge t>0$,
\begin{align}
(x-t)\ln(x-t) = x\ln x -t (\ln x+1) + \int_x^{x-t} \frac{x-t-u}{u}du
\end{align}
so
\begin{align}\label{eq:entropy_inequality}
|(x-t)\ln(x-t) - x\ln x| \le t|\ln x+1| + \left|\int_x^{x-t} \frac{x-t}{u}du\right| + t\le t|\ln x+1| + 2t \le t(3-\ln x).
\end{align}
As a result,
\begin{align}
\max_{1\le k\le n}\left|f\left(\frac{k+a}{n+Sa}\right) - f\left(\frac{k-1+a}{n+Sa}\right)\right|
&\le \max_{1\le k\le n}\frac{1}{n+Sa}\left(3-\ln\left(\frac{k+a}{n+Sa}\right) \right) \\
&\le \frac{1}{n+Sa}\left(3+\ln \left(\frac{n+Sa}{a+1}\right)\right).
\end{align}
Hence, the bounded differences inequality shows that
\begin{align}
\mathsf{Var}\left(H(\hat{P}_B)\right) \le n\max_{2\le k\le n}\left(f\left(\frac{k+a}{n+Sa}\right) - f\left(\frac{k-1+a}{n+Sa}\right)\right)^2\le \frac{n}{(n+Sa)^2}\left(3+\ln\left(\frac{n+Sa}{a+1}\right)\right)^2
\end{align}
which completes the proof of the first part.
For the second inequality, the Efron-Stein inequality gives a general upper bound on the variance.
\begin{lemma}
\cite[Thm. 3.1]{Boucheron--Lugosi--Massart2013} Let $Z_1,\cdots,Z_n$ be independent random variables and let $f(Z_1,Z_2,\cdots,Z_n)$ be a squared integrable function. Moreover, if $(Z_1',Z_2',\cdots,Z_n')$ are independent copies of $(Z_1, Z_2,\cdots,Z_n)$ and if we define, for every $i=1,2,\cdots,n$,
\begin{align}
f_i' = f(Z_1,Z_2,\cdots,Z_{i-1},Z_i',Z_{i+1},\cdots,Z_n)
\end{align}
then
\begin{align}
\mathsf{Var}(f) \le \frac{1}{2}\sum_{i=1}^n \mathbb{E}(f_i-f_i')^2.
\end{align}
\end{lemma}
Since $H(\hat{P}_B)=\hat{H}_B(Z_1,\cdots,Z_n)$ is invariant to any permutation of $(Z_1,Z_2,\cdots,Z_n)$, we know that the Efron-Stein inequality implies
\begin{align}
\mathsf{Var}\left(H(\hat{P}_B)\right) \le \frac{n}{2}\mathbb{E}\left(\hat{H}_B(Z_1',Z_2,\cdots,Z_n)-\hat{H}_B(Z_1,Z_2,\cdots,Z_n)\right)^2
\end{align}
where $Z_1'$ is an i.i.d. copy of $Z_1$.
Now define
\begin{align}
X_i = \sum_{j=1}^n \mathbbm{1}(Z_j=i),\qquad 1\le i\le S.
\end{align}
For brevity, we denote the $S$-tuple $(X_1,\cdots,X_S)$ as $X_1^S$, and the $n$-tuple $(Z_1,\cdots,Z_n)$ as $Z_1^n$. A specific realization of $(X_1,\cdots,X_S)$ is denoted by $x_1^S=(x_1,\cdots,x_S)$, and a specific realization of $(Z_1,\cdots,Z_n)$ is denoted by $z_1^n=(z_1,\cdots,z_n)$. Then we have
\begin{align}
&\mathbb{E}\left(\hat{H}_B(Z_1',Z_2,\cdots,Z_n)-\hat{H}_B(Z_1,Z_2,\cdots,Z_n)\right)^2\\ &=
\sum_{x_1^S} \mathbb{P}(X_1^S=x_1^S)\mathbb{E}\left[\left(\hat{H}_B(Z_1',Z_2,\cdots,Z_n)-\hat{H}_B(Z_1,Z_2,\cdots,Z_n)\right)^2\left|X_1^S=x_1^S\right.\right].
\end{align}
In light of \cite[Lemma B.1]{Jiao--Venkat--Han--Weissman2014MLEnew}, we know that the conditional distribution of $Z_1$ conditioned on $(X_1,\cdots,X_S)$ is the discrete distribution $(X_1/n,X_2/n,\cdots,X_S/n)$. Denoting $r(p)=f(\frac{np+a}{n+Sa})$, we can rewrite
\begin{align}
\hat{H}_B(Z_1',Z_2,\cdots,Z_n)-\hat{H}_B(Z_1,Z_2,\cdots,Z_n) = D_- + D_+
\end{align}
where
\begin{align}
D_- &= r\left(\frac{X_{Z_1}-1}{n}\right) - r\left(\frac{X_{Z_1}}{n}\right)\\
D_+ &= \begin{cases}
r\left(\frac{X_{Z_1'}+1}{n}\right) - r\left(\frac{X_{Z_1'}}{n}\right)&Z_1\neq Z_1'\\
r\left(\frac{X_{Z_1'}}{n}\right) - r\left(\frac{X_{Z_1'}-1}{n}\right)&Z_1= Z_1'
\end{cases}.
\end{align}
Here, $D_-$ is the change in $\hat{H}_B$ that occurs when $Z_1$ is removed according to the distribution $(X_1/n,X_2/n,\cdots,X_S/n)$, and $D_+$ is the change in $\hat{H}$ that occurs when $Z_1'$ is added back according to the true distribution $P$. Now we have
\begin{align}
\mathbb{E}[D_-^2|X_1^S] &= \sum_{i=1}^S \frac{X_i}{n}\left(r\left(\frac{X_{i}-1}{n}\right)-r\left(\frac{X_{i}}{n}\right)\right)^2\\
\mathbb{E}[D_+^2|X_1^S] &= \sum_{i=1}^S p_i\frac{X_i}{n}\left(r\left(\frac{X_{i}}{n}\right)-r\left(\frac{X_{i}-1}{n}\right)\right)^2
+ \sum_{i=1}^S p_i\left(1-\frac{X_i}{n}\right)\left(r\left(\frac{X_{i}+1}{n}\right)-r\left(\frac{X_{i}}{n}\right)\right)^2
\end{align}
where we define $r(x)=0$ when $x\notin[0,1]$. Then, by the law of iterated expectation, we know that
\begin{align}
\mathbb{E}[D_-^2] &= \sum_{i=1}^S \sum_{j=0}^n\frac{j}{n}\left(r\left(\frac{j-1}{n}\right)-r\left(\frac{j}{n}\right)\right)^2\times\mathbb{P}(\mathsf{B}(n,p_i)=j)\\
\mathbb{E}[D_+^2] &= \sum_{i=1}^S \sum_{j=0}^n\left(\frac{j}{n}\left(r\left(\frac{j-1}{n}\right)-r\left(\frac{j}{n}\right)\right)^2 + \left(1-\frac{j}{n}\right) \left(r\left(\frac{j+1}{n}\right)-r\left(\frac{j}{n}\right)\right)^2 \right)\times p_i\mathbb{P}(\mathsf{B}(n,p_i)=j)
\end{align}
After some algebra we can show that $\mathbb{E}[D_-^2]=\mathbb{E}[D_+^2]$. Hence, we have
\begin{align}
\mathsf{Var}\left(H(\hat{P}_B)\right) &\le \frac{n}{2}\mathbb{E}\left(D_-+D_+\right)^2\le n\mathbb{E}\left(D_-^2+D_+^2\right) = 2n\mathbb{E} D_-^2 \\
&= 2n\sum_{i=1}^S\mathbb{E} P_n(i)\left(r(P_n(i)-\frac{1}{n})-r(P_n(i))\right)^2\\
&\le 2n\sum_{i=1}^S \mathbb{E} P_n(i)\left(\frac{1}{n+Sa}\left[3-\ln \left(\frac{nP_n(i)+a}{n+Sa}\right)\right]\right)^2\\
&= \frac{2n}{(n+Sa)^2}\sum_{i=1}^S \mathbb{E} P_n(i)\left(3-\ln \left(\frac{nP_n(i)+a}{n+Sa}\right)\right)^2\\
&\le \frac{2n}{(n+Sa)^2}\sum_{i=1}^S p_i\left(3-\ln \left(\frac{np_i+a}{n+Sa}\right)\right)^2\\
&\le \frac{2n}{(n+Sa)^2}S\cdot \frac{1}{S}\left(3-\ln \left(\frac{n/S+a}{n+Sa}\right)\right)^2\\
&= \frac{2n(3+\ln S)^2}{(n+Sa)^2}
\end{align}
where we have used the inequality (\ref{eq:entropy_inequality}) and Jensen's inequality due to
\begin{align}
\frac{d^2}{dx^2}\left[x\left(\ln \left(\frac{nx+a}{n+Sa}\right)-3\right)^2\right] = \frac{n}{nx+a}\left[3\left(\ln \left(\frac{nx+a}{n+Sa}\right)-3\right)+\frac{nx}{nx+a}\left(4-\ln \left(\frac{nx+a}{n+Sa}\right)\right)\right]<0.
\end{align}
\end{proof}
\section{Proof of the lower bound}\label{sec.prooflowerbound}
Theorem~\ref{thm.lowerbound} follows upon applying the inequality
\begin{equation}
\sup_{P\in\mathcal{M}_S} \mathbb{E}_P\left(H(\hat{P}_B)-H(P)\right)^2 \geq \max\{C,D\}\geq \frac{C+D}{2},
\end{equation}
where expressions $C$ and $D$ are given, respectively, in the following two theorems.
\begin{theorem}
\cite{Wu--Yang2014minimax} There exists a universal constant $c>0$ such that
\begin{align}
\sup_{P\in\mathcal{M}_S} \mathbb{E}_P\left(H(\hat{P}_B)-H(P)\right)^2 \ge c\frac{\ln^2 S}{n}.
\end{align}
\end{theorem}
\begin{theorem}
If $n\ge\max\{15S,Sa\}$,
\begin{equation}
\sup_{P\in\mathcal{M}_S}\left |\mathbb{E}_P H(\hat{P}_B) - H(P) \right| \ge \frac{(S-3)a}{4(n+Sa)}\ln \left( \frac{n+Sa}{a}\right) + \frac{S-1}{8n} + \frac{S^2}{80n^2} - \frac{1}{48n^2}
\end{equation}
If $n<Sa$, then
\begin{equation}
\sup_{P\in\mathcal{M}_S}\left |\mathbb{E}_P H(\hat{P}_B) - H(P) \right| \geq \frac{\ln S}{4}.
\end{equation}
If $n<15S$, then
\begin{equation}
\sup_{P\in\mathcal{M}_S}\left |\mathbb{E}_P H(\hat{P}_B) - H(P) \right| \geq \frac{(S-3)a}{4(n+Sa)}\ln \left( \frac{n+Sa}{a}\right) + \frac{\lfloor n/15 \rfloor}{8n} - \frac{1}{16n}.
\end{equation}
\end{theorem}
\begin{proof}
By setting $P=(1,0,0,\cdots,0)$, we have $H(P)=0$ and
\begin{align}
H(\hat{P}_B) = -\frac{(S-1)a}{n+Sa}\ln\left(\frac{a}{n+Sa}\right) -\frac{n+a}{n+Sa}\ln\left(\frac{n+a}{n+Sa}\right) \ge \frac{(S-1)a}{n+Sa}\ln\left(\frac{n+Sa}{a}\right)\quad a.s.
\end{align}
hence we have obtained the first lower bound
\begin{align}
\sup_{P\in\mathcal{M}_S}\left|\mathbb{E}_P H(\hat{P}_B) - H(P)\right| \ge \frac{(S-1)a}{n+Sa}\ln\left(\frac{n+Sa}{a}\right).
\end{align}
Note that if $n<Sa$, then
\begin{equation}
\sup_{P\in\mathcal{M}_S}\left|\mathbb{E}_P H(\hat{P}_B) - H(P)\right| \ge \frac{(S-1)a}{2Sa}\ln S \geq \frac{\ln S}{4}.
\end{equation}
From now on we assume $n\geq Sa$. For $n\ge 15S$, it follows from \cite[Lemma 2.11]{Jiao--Venkat--Han--Weissman2014MLEnew} that
\begin{align} \label{eqn.mlepaperlowerbound}
\sup_{P\in\mathcal{M}_S}\left|\mathbb{E}_P H(\hat{P}) - H(P)\right| \ge \frac{S-1}{2n} + \frac{S^2}{20n^2} - \frac{1}{12n^2}.
\end{align}
If $n<15S$, then it follows from the proof of \cite[Lemma 2.11]{Jiao--Venkat--Han--Weissman2014MLEnew} that one can essentially take $S = \lfloor n/15 \rfloor$ in (\ref{eqn.mlepaperlowerbound}), and obtain
\begin{equation}
\sup_{P\in\mathcal{M}_S}\left|\mathbb{E}_P H(\hat{P}) - H(P)\right| \ge \frac{\lfloor n/15 \rfloor}{2n} - \frac{1}{4n}.
\end{equation}
It follows from a refinement result of Cover and Thomas~\cite[Thm. 17.3.3]{Cover--Thomas2006} that when $| \hat{p}_{B,i} - \hat{p}_i | \leq 1/2$ for all $i$ (which is ensured by condition $n\geq Sa$), we have
\begin{align}
|H(\hat{P}_B) - H(\hat{P})| \leq -\frac{2Sa}{n+Sa} \ln \left( \frac{2a}{n+Sa}\right) \le \frac{2Sa}{n+Sa}\ln\left(\frac{n+Sa}{a}\right).
\end{align}
A combination of these two inequalities yield the second lower bound
\begin{align}
\sup_{P\in\mathcal{M}_S}\left|\mathbb{E}_P H(\hat{P}_B) - H(P)\right | \ge \frac{S-1}{2n} + \frac{S^2}{20n^2} - \frac{1}{12n^2} - \frac{2Sa}{n+Sa}\ln\left(\frac{n+Sa}{a}\right)
\end{align}
when $n\geq 15S$, and the second lower bound
\begin{equation}
\sup_{P\in\mathcal{M}_S}\left|\mathbb{E}_P H(\hat{P}_B) - H(P)\right | \ge \frac{\lfloor n/15 \rfloor}{2n} - \frac{1}{4n} - \frac{2Sa}{n+Sa}\ln\left(\frac{n+Sa}{a}\right)
\end{equation}
when $n<15S$.
Hence we are done by using these two lower bounds and the inequality $\max\{a,b\}\ge \frac{3a+b}{4}$.
\end{proof}
We prove Theorem~\ref{thm.bayeslowerbound} below.
\begin{proof}
We first assume that $n\geq Sa$. Applying the recursive formula $\psi(x+1) = \psi(x) + 1/x$, we know that $\psi(a + X_i + 1)\geq \psi(a+1)$, since $X_i$ is an non-negative integer. Hence, we have
\begin{equation}
\hat{H}^{\mathsf{Bayes}} \leq \psi(Sa + n + 1) - \sum_{i = 1}^S \frac{a+X_i}{Sa + n}\psi(a+1) = \psi(Sa + n+1) - \psi(a+1).
\end{equation}
We know that the digamma function $\psi(x)$ is strictly increasing from $-\infty$ to $\infty$ on $(0,\infty)$, and that for any $x\geq 1, x\in \mathbb{R}$,
\begin{equation}
\ln \lfloor x \rfloor -\gamma \leq \psi(x) \leq 1+ \ln(\lfloor x \rfloor) -\gamma,
\end{equation}
where $\gamma \approx 0.57721$ is the Euler–-Mascheroni constant.
Hence, we know
\begin{equation}
\hat{H}^{\mathsf{Bayes}} \leq 1-\gamma + \ln(Sa + n + 1) - (-\gamma) = 1 + \ln(Sa + n +1) \leq 1+\ln(2n+1),
\end{equation}
where we used the assumption that $n\geq Sa$. Since the Bayes estimator under Dirichlet prior is upper bounded by $1+\ln(2n+1)$ for all possible realizations, the squared error it incurs for uniform distribution is at least $\left( \ln S - 1 - \ln(2n+1)\right)^2$ when $S\geq e(2n+1)$. The first part is proved.
Regarding the second part, we assume $n<Sa$. Take $P = (1,0,\ldots,0)\in \mathcal{M}_S$. Thus,
\begin{equation}
\hat{H}^{\mathsf{Bayes}} = \psi(Sa + n + 1) - \frac{(S-1)a}{Sa + n}\psi(a + 1) - \frac{a+n}{Sa + n}\psi(a+n+1),\quad a.s.
\end{equation}
and the corresponding true entropy $H(P) = 0$.
Using the monotonicity of $\psi(x)$ on $(0,\infty)$, we have
\begin{align}
\hat{H}^{\mathsf{Bayes}} & \geq \psi(Sa + n + 1) - \psi(a+n+1) \\
& \geq \ln(Sa + n) - \gamma - (1+\ln(a+n+1)-\gamma)\\
& = \ln(Sa + n) -1 -\ln(a+n+1) \\
& = \ln \left( \frac{Sa+n}{e(a+n+1)} \right).
\end{align}
Hence, the squared error incurred by the Bayes estimator under Dirichlet prior for $P = (1,0,\ldots,0)\in \mathcal{M}_S$ is at least $\left( \ln \left( \frac{Sa + n}{e(a+n+1)} \right)\right)_+^2$. The second part is proved.
\end{proof}
\section{Acknowledgments}
The authors would like to thank Maya Gupta for raising the question answered in this paper.
\appendices
\section{Proof of the bias analysis in Theorem~\ref{thm.upperbound}}
The following theorem gives the upper bound on the squared bias used in Theorem~\ref{thm.upperbound}.
\begin{theorem}
If $n\ge Sa$,
\begin{align}
\sup_{P\in\mathcal{M}_S}\mathbb{E}_P|H(\hat{P}_B) - H(P)| \le \ln\left(1+\frac{S-1}{n+Sa}\right) + \frac{2Sa}{n+Sa} \ln \left( \frac{n+Sa}{2a}\right).
\end{align}
\end{theorem}
\begin{proof}
We have
\begin{equation}
H(\hat{P}_B) = \sum_{i = 1}^S-\hat{p}_{B,i} \ln \hat{p}_{B,i} = H(P_B) + \sum_{i =1}^S (p_{B,i} - \hat{p}_{B,i}) \ln p_{B,i} - \sum_{i = 1}^S \hat{p}_{B,i} \ln \frac{\hat{p}_{B,i}}{p_{B,i}}.
\end{equation}
Taking expectations on both sides, we have
\begin{equation}
\mathbb{E} H(\hat{P}_B) - H(P) = H(P_B) - H(P) - \mathbb{E} D(\hat{P}_B \| P_B),
\end{equation}
where $D(P\|Q) = \sum_{i = 1}^S p_i \ln \frac{p_i}{q_i}$ is the KL divergence between distributions $P$ and $Q$. In order to analyze the bias, it suffices to analyze the two terms separately. We first analyze $\mathbb{E} D(\hat{P}_B \| P_B)$.
It follows from Jensen's inequality that
\begin{equation}
D(P \| Q) = \sum_{i = 1}^S p_i \ln \frac{p_i}{q_i} \leq \ln \left( \sum_{i = 1}^S \frac{p_i^2}{q_i} \right),
\end{equation}
whose derivation here follows from Tsybakov~\cite[Lemma 2.7]{Tsybakov2008}.
By Jensen's inequality, we have
\begin{equation}
\mathbb{E} D(\hat{P}_B \| P_B) \leq \mathbb{E} \ln \left( \sum_{i = 1}^S \frac{\hat{p}_{B,i}^2}{p_{B,i}} \right) \leq \ln \left( \sum_{i = 1}^S \frac{\mathbb{E} \hat{p}_{B,i}^2 }{p_{B,i}} \right).
\end{equation}
We also have
\begin{equation}
\sum_{i = 1}^S \frac{p_i^2}{q_i} = 1 + \sum_{i =1}^S \frac{(p_i - q_i)^2}{q_i},
\end{equation}
and that
\begin{equation}
\mathbb{E} (\hat{p}_{B,i} - p_{B,i})^2 = \frac{n^2}{(n+Sa)^2} \mathbb{E} (\hat{p}_i - p_i)^2 = \frac{n p_i(1-p_i)}{(n+Sa)^2}.
\end{equation}
Hence,
\begin{equation}
\mathbb{E} D(\hat{P}_B \| P_B) \leq \ln \left( 1+ \sum_{i = 1}^S \frac{n p_i(1-p_i)}{(n+Sa)(np_i+a)} \right) = \ln \left( 1+ \sum_{i = 1}^S \frac{n p_i(1-p_i)}{(n+Sa)np_i} \frac{np_i}{np_i+a} \right) \leq \ln \left( 1+ \sum_{i = 1}^S \frac{1-p_i}{(n+Sa)} \right),
\end{equation}
which implies that
\begin{equation}
\mathbb{E} D(\hat{P}_B \| P_B) \leq \ln \left( 1+\frac{S-1}{n+Sa} \right) \leq \frac{S-1}{n+Sa}.
\end{equation}
Now we consider the deterministic gap $H(P_B) - H(P)$. It follows from a refinement result of Cover and Thomas~\cite[Thm. 17.3.3]{Cover--Thomas2006} that when $| p_{B,i} - p_i | \leq 1/2$ for all $i$, we have
\begin{equation}\label{eq:near_lips}
|H(P_B) - H(P)| \leq \| P_B - P \|_1 \ln \frac{\| P_B - P \|_1}{S}.
\end{equation}
Note that the condition $n\ge Sa$ ensures that $| p_{B,i} - p_i | \leq 1/2$. We compute
\begin{equation}
\| P_B - P\|_1 = \frac{Sa}{n+Sa} \sum_{i = 1}^S \left|p_i -\frac{1}{S}\right|.
\end{equation}
Taking a naive bound $\sum_{i = 1}^S |p_i -\frac{1}{S}| \leq 2$, we have
\begin{equation}
\| P_B - P\|_1 \leq \frac{2Sa}{n+Sa}.
\end{equation}
Hence,
\begin{equation}
|H(P_B) - H(P)| \leq -\frac{2Sa}{n+Sa} \ln \left( \frac{2a}{n+Sa}\right).
\end{equation}
\end{proof}
\bibliographystyle{IEEEtran}
|
\section{Introduction}\label{sec:introduction}
As psychophysics experiments suggested, humans can successfully identify objects in images using contour fragments alone~\cite{PsychologyContour}. In computer vision, recognizing object shapes from salient contours is an active research area. Several methods~\cite{ShiShapeCVPR2010,LateckiCVPR2011,ShapeParsing,PAS} have demonstrated that the contours (silhouettes) are robust against variations of illumination, color, and texture. However, there are two long-standing difficulties in the current research.
\begin{itemize}
\item Unreliable edge map extraction and contour tracing. Some key contours can be missing or connected to their background, making it difficult for accurately localizing shapes against surrounding clutter.
\item Large variations within an object category, e.g. different object poses, views, occlusions, and deformations. Without using appearance or texture information, this challenge might be more serious, as shape contours are somewhat ambiguous and less discriminative.
\end{itemize}
Some recently proposed approaches addressed the two issues by learning hierarchical and compositional models, and achieved substantial progresses~\cite{ShottonPAMI08, ShiShapeCVPR2010,LinGraphMatch}. These models represent an object shape in terms of the parts (i.e. local contours) and the inter-part relations. However, their model structures (e.g. the number of parts and the ways of composition) are often fixed, consequently limiting the performances on complex scenarios.
In this work, we develop a novel reconfigurable part-based model in the form of an And-Or graph representation, which is discriminatively trained from weakly annotated training data (i.e. without annotating the object parts). Our model achieves superior performances on the task of detecting and localizing shapes from cluttered background, compared with other state-of-the-art methods. Figure~\ref{fig:AOG_example} shows an example of our And-Or graph model. The key component of our model is the ``switch variable'', referred to the or-node, which incorporates the compositional alternatives and makes the model reconfigurable. Specifically, the or-node specifies the way of compositions by activating the child nodes, to deal with the above-mentioned challenges in shape detection. Our And-Or graph model consists of four layers described as follows.
The \textbf{leaf-nodes} at the bottom represent a batch of local classifiers that detect the salient contour fragments of objects. Each leaf-node is defined within a divided block, denoted by the red box in the bottom of Figure~\ref{fig:AOG_example}. Given the edge map extracted from an image, a leaf-node takes the contours fallen into its block as the inputs. Once a long contour exceeds the block, it is automatically truncated. This is actually a partial matching scheme to handle the unreliable bottom-up edge tracing, i.e. to avoid object contours connecting to the background. Moreover, to capture the discriminability of contours, we design a new contour feature that combines the triangle-based descriptor~\cite{ShapeGroup} and the Shape Context descriptor~\cite{ShapeContext}.
The \textbf{or-nodes} defined as the switch variables that specify the activation of their child leaf-nodes, denoted by the dashed blue circles in Figure~\ref{fig:AOG_example}. During detection, each or-node activates one of its child lead-nodes and also selects the contour fragment detected by the activated leaf-node. The or-nodes thus represent the parts of an object shape, while the leaf-nodes capture all of the local variabilities. As Figure~\ref{fig:AOG_example} illustrates, our model can capture not only the local variations (e.g. part 2 of the example), but also the inconsistency caused by missing or broken edges (e.g. part 3 of the example).
The \textbf{collaborative edges} in our model impose the contextual information among shape contours, denoted by the horizontal links between the leaf-nodes in Figure~\ref{fig:AOG_example}. Some of the existing compositional shape models ignore the contextual relations among contours, or simplify the relations by calculating the co-occurrence frequencies of neighbor contours~\cite{LinICCV07}. In contrast, we utilize informative spatial layout features to define the edges, motivated by the methods for contextualized object detection~\cite{DesaiIJCV,LateckiECCV2010}.
The \textbf{and-nodes} aggregate the local shape contours that have been selected via the or-nodes. Each and-node is defined as a potential function that captures the holistic shape deformations and distortions. Once the contour fragments are localized, The and-nodes further verify them as a whole to improve the discriminability of our model.
The \textbf{root-node} at the top functions as a switch to choose its child and-nodes, accounting for the large global variations (e.g. different views of shapes). It is defined exactly in the same way as the or-nodes. For example, two horses may appear diversely under different views, so that our model can adaptively activate different and-nodes for detecting them.
From the bottom to the top, our model is hierarchically constructed into an ``And-Or-And-Or'' structure. Note that the leaf-nodes in our model can also be viewed as the and-nodes, as they are defined in the same way. This structure is very expressive and general to model object variations. The ``And'' symbol indicates the combination of sub-parts while the ``Or'' symbol indicates the switch between possible configurations. We introduce the latent variables to make our model reconfigurable. In particular, the latent variables include the activation states of the or-nodes and the root-nodes, and the locations of contour fragments. The leaf-nodes and the and-nodes are defined as classification functions whose coefficients are treated as the observable model parameters. With the latent variables, the graph nodes and edges are explicitly mapped with the discriminative classification function of our model. Figure~\ref{fig:AoG_feature} provides an intuitive illustration of our And-Or graph model, which will be discussed later on. We regard our model as a general extension of the pictorial and deformable part-based models~\cite{Pictorial,HumanExp1,LatentSVM}, as it incorporates not only the hierarchical decompositions, but also the explicit structural alternatives.
The training of the And-Or graph model is another innovation of this work. The challenges lie in two aspects. First, multiple parameters in different layers need to be optimized along with the latent variables, and the objective function for optimization is non-convex, which cannot be solved directly with the traditional methods such as the support vector machines (SVMs). Second, it is non-trivial to automatically discover the model structures in the model learning, as the training examples are not annotated into object parts. In the literature, learning And-Or graph models (or other reconfigurable models) usually relies on elaborative annotations or initializations~\cite{LeoAOG,AOGgrammar,LinGrammar}. To cope with these two problems, we propose a novel learning method, called Dynamical Structural Optimization (DSO), which is inspired by the recently proposed optimization methods~\cite{LatentSVM,CCCP,SVMICML2009}. This algorithm iteratively optimizes the model structures together with the multi-layer parameter learning, which includes three main steps. (i) Apply current model on the training examples while estimating the latent variables for each example. (ii) Discover new model structures. As the model structures are mapped with the discriminative function of our model (see Figure~\ref{fig:AoG_feature}), refactoring (rearranging) the feature vectors of training examples can lead to new structures. In brief, we perform clustering on the sub-feature-vectors corresponding to different nodes, and generate new structures according to the clustering results. For example, at one part of the shape, if the corresponding sub-feature-vectors are clustered into three groups, then we create three leaf-nodes accordingly to detect the local contours. (iii) Learn the model parameters with the newly generated structures.
Shape detection using the And-Or graph model is realized by searching over a image pyramid. We first accomplish two testing steps to generate several hypotheses of detection, and each hypothesis represents a configuration comprising detected contour fragments. (i) Local testing uses all leaf-nodes to detector contour fragments within the edge map. (ii) Binding testing imposes the collaborative edges among the contour fragments to further weigh the hypotheses. Afterwards, the and-nodes re-score each hypothesis by measuring the contour fragments as a whole. The root-node decides the final detection by selecting the most possible hypothesis.
The remainder of this paper is organized as follows. Section \ref{sec:related-work} provides a brief review of related work. Then we present the model representations in Section \ref{sec:representation} and follow with a description of the inference procedure in Section \ref{sec:inference}. Section \ref{sec:learning} focuses on discussing the learning algorithm. The experimental results and comparisons are exhibited in Section \ref{sec:experiment}. Section \ref{sec:conclusion} concludes this paper.
\section{Related Work}\label{sec:related-work}
In this section, we review the extant techniques for shape (or contour) matching and shape model learning.
Many methods treat shape detection as a task of matching contours with certain distance measures, and they mostly utilized hand-drawn reference templates~\cite{ShapeContext,ShapeTree,ShiShapeECCV2008,BaiTransduction,ShapeGroup,PartialMatchingECCV2010,LateckiCVPR2011}. To handle diverse shape deformations and distortions, a number of robust shape (or contour) descriptors have been extensively discussed, such as Shape Context~\cite{ShapeContext}, Geodesic-Intensity Histogram~\cite{InnerDis}, Contour Flexibility~\cite{ConFlexibility}, and Local Angle~\cite{PartialMatchingECCV2010,ShapeGroup}. Based on these shape features, several effective matching schemes~\cite{LinGraphMatch,TuShape,BaiTransduction} have been proposed to deal with the various challenges. For example, the inner-distance matching algorithm~\cite{InnerDis} was presented to handle the articulated shape deformations. Tu et al.~\cite{TuShape} presented an efficient data-driven EM algorithm to iteratively optimize shape alignment and matching correspondences. Felzenszwalb et al.~\cite{ShapeTree} proposed to hierarchically match shapes using the dynamic programming algorithm, demonstrating good potential in capturing large shape deformations. An MCMC-based sampling algorithm was discussed in~\cite{LinGraphMatch} to solve multi-layer shape matching.
To overcome the problems caused by incomplete or noisy contours, Zhu et al.~\cite{ShiShapeECCV2008} presented a many-to-many contour matching algorithm using a voting scheme. Riemenschneider et al.~\cite{PartialMatchingECCV2010} solved the partial shape matching by identifying matches from fragments of arbitrary length to the reference contours.
An alternative to shape detection is addressed by learning shape models for a given category of shape instances. These methods represent shapes as a loose collection of local contour fragments or an ensemble of pairwise constraints~\cite{ShottonPAMI08,LinICCV07,ShiShapeCVPR2010}. They usually involve the construction of a codebook of contour fragments (e.g. Groups of Adjacent Contours (GAS)~\cite{PAS}) and train the shape models by supervised leaning. For example, the boosting methods were employed to train the discriminative classifiers with contour-based features~\cite{ShottonPAMI08,ZissermanECCV2006}. Maji et al.~\cite{MalikCVPR2009} incorporated the Hough transform into a discriminative learning framework, in which the contour words and their spatial layout were optimized jointly. Kokkinos and Yuille~\cite{ShapeParsing} suggested hierarchically parsing shapes with the bottom-up and top-down computations, and adopted the multiple instance learning algorithm for model training. Another type of shape template is the active basis model proposed by Wu et al.~\cite{ActiveBasis}, which was trained with a shared sketch algorithm.
Very recently, major progress has been made in appearance-based object recognition using the latent structure models~\cite{LeoCCCP,LatentSVM,ShapeNIPS2012}, in which the latent variables effectively enrich the representations. These methods owe their success to their ability to cope with deformations, occlusions, and variations. Based on these methods, Srinivasan et al.~\cite{ShiShapeCVPR2010} trained the descriptive contour-based detector by using the latent-SVM algorithm, Song et al.~\cite{ContextSVMCVPR2010} integrated the context information with the SVM-based learning, and Schnitzspan et al.~\cite{HierachicalCVPR2009} further combined the latent discriminative learning with conditional random fields using multi-types of shape features.
The And-Or graph was originally explored by Zhu and Mumford~\cite{AOGgrammar} for modeling complex visual patterns. Its key idea, using And/Or nodes to account for structure reconfigurations and variabilities in hierarchical composition, has been extensively applied in several vision tasks such as object and scene parsing~\cite{LeoAOG,HierarchicalPoslets,LinGrammar} and event analysis ~\cite{EventGrammar}. However, these approaches often require elaborate annotations or manual initializations. Si and Zhu~\cite{AOTemplate} recently presented a framework for unsupervised learning of the And-Or image template, and demonstrated very promising results on modeling complex object categories. Our approach is partially motivated by these works, and we target on an alternative way to discriminatively train the And-Or graph model with the non-convex optimization. Our preliminary attempts along this path have been discussed in \cite{ShapeNIPS2012,LinAndOrTree}.
\section{Representations}\label{sec:representation}
In this section, we define all the components of our And-Or graph models, including the shape features and the potential functions for graph nodes and edges.
\subsection{Contour Descriptor}
First, we introduce our contour descriptor for characterizing local contour fragments. As Figure~\ref{fig:feature} illustrates, this feature combines the triangle-based descriptor~\cite{ShapeGroup} and the Shape Context~\cite{ShapeContext}, capturing local contour deformations with the surrounding contexts. For any contour fragment we extract a sequence of sample points $\Omega$, and for each point in $\Omega$, its triangle-based descriptor and Shape Context descriptor are both computed and concatenated into a vector. Then we pool the vectors of all the sample points into a histogram.
\begin{figure}[!htb]
\centering
\epsfig{figure=feature.pdf, width=2.1 in}
\caption{ Illustration of the proposed contour descriptor. This feature combines the Shape Context descriptor in (a) and the triangle-based descriptor in (b) to characterize a local contour fragment. }\label{fig:feature}
\end{figure}
Given a point $T \in\Omega$ for a contour, we collect triangles that are formed by $T$ and any other two $A, B$ in $\Omega$. Note that each triangle is constructed by three different points. As Figure~\ref{fig:feature}(b) illustrates, the triangle-based descriptor for $T$ is a 3-D histogram, denoted by $\mathbb{H}^{t}(T)$, which contains the angle values (e.g. $\angle{BTA}$) and the two distances $TA$ and $TB$ in each dimension, respectively. We use the clockwise orientation to determine the triangle $\angle{BTA}$, and the distances $TB$ and $TA$ are normalized by the average distance between the points in $\Omega$. The Shape Context descriptor, denoted by $\mathbb{H}^{b}(T)$, is constructed by $T$ and all other points in $\Omega$.
In our implementation, the number of sample points for each contour fragment is fixed at $20$ , and the distances between adjacent points in $\Omega$ are equal. For each point $T$, $(20-1)*(20-2) / 2 = 171$ triangles are thus collected. We define the 3-D histogram $\mathbb{H}^{t}(T)$ including 2 bins for $TA$, 2 bins for $TB$, and 6 bins for angle $\angle{BTA}$ ranging from $0$ to $\pi$. We transform $\mathbb{H}^{t}(T)$ into a $2 \times 2 \times 6 = 24$-bin 1-D feature vector. For the Shape Context descriptor $\mathbb{H}^{b}(T)$, we use $2$ bins for lengths and $6$ bins for polar angles ranging from $0$ to $2\pi$, then its length is $2 \times 6 = 12$. By concatenating these two descriptors, we obtain the feature vector of $T$ including $(24+12) = 36$ bins. Thus, the contour fragment is represented by a feature vector of $36 * 20 = 702$ bins.
\subsection{And-Or Graph Model}
Our model is defined in the form of an And-Or graph $\mathcal{G}= (\mathcal{V},\mathcal{E})$, where $\mathcal{V}$ includes four levels of nodes and $\mathcal{E}$ includes the graph edges. The root-node is indexed as 0, indicating the switch among different shape views,(or other different global variations, by analogy). The and-nodes are indexed by $r = 1,...,m$, with each representing one global classifier. For each and-node, there are a number of $z$ or-nodes arranged in a layout of $b_1 \times b_2$ blocks to represent several object parts, and we index all of the or-nodes as $j = m + 1, ..., (z+1) * m$. The leaf-nodes in the fourth layer are indexed by $i = (z+1)*m+1,...,(z+1)*m+1+n$, where $n$ is the number of leaf-nodes. For notation simplicity, we define $m^{\prime} = (z+1)*m+1, n^{\prime} = (z+1)*m+1+n$, and $i \in ch(j)$ indicating a child node of node $j$. The details of the model $\mathcal{G}$ are described as follows.
\textbf{Leaf-node:} Each leaf-node $L_i $ is a local classifier for detecting partial shape contours. We denote the location of leaf-node $L_i$ as $p_i$, which is determined by its parent or-node. Given the extracted edge map $X$, we treat contour fragments within the observed block as the inputs of $L_i$. For a contour $c$, we denote $\phi^{l}(p_i,c)$ as its feature vector using the proposed contour descriptor, and only the part of $c$ that has fallen into the block will be considered. Note that we can prune some very short contours as noises in practice. The response of classifier $L_i$ located at $p_i$ is defined as:
\begin{equation}\label{eq:leaf-node_score}
\mathcal{R}_{i}^{l}(X,p_i) =\max_{c \in X} \omega_{i}^{l} \cdot \phi^{l}(p_i,c),
\end{equation}
where $\omega_{i}^{l}$ is a parameter vector that is set to zero if the corresponding leaf-node $L_j$ is nonexistent. We can thus localize the contour representing the shape part by $c_i = argmax_{c \in X} \omega_{i}^{l} \cdot \phi^{l}(p_i,c)$. This partial detecting scheme enables to partition true object contours from cluttered background.
\textbf{Or-node:} The or-node $U_j, j = m + 1, ..., (z+1) * m $ specifies one of its child leaf-nodes, and also the contour detected by the leaf-node. Every or-node is allowed to slightly perturb their locations with respect to the root in order to capture the inter-part deformations.
For each or-node $U_j$, we define the deformation feature, $\phi^{s}(p_0, p_j) = (dx,dy,dx^2,dy^2)$, where $(dx,dy)$ encodes the displacement of the or-node position $p_j$ to the expected position $p_0$ determined by the root-node. The cost of locating $U_j$ at $p_j$ is:
\begin{equation}
D_{j}(p_0, p_j) = \omega_{j}^{s} \cdot \phi^{s}(p_0, p_j),
\end{equation}
where $\omega_{j}^{s}$ is a 4-dimensional parameter vector corresponding to $\phi^{s}(p_0, p_j)$.
For each leaf-node $L_i$ associated with $U_j$, we introduce an indicator variable $v_i \in \{ 0, 1 \}$ representing whether it is activated by $U_j$ or not. We also define an auxiliary vector for $U_j$, $\mathbf{v}_j = \{v_{i}\}_{i \in ch(j)}$, where $ ||\mathbf{v}_{j}|| = 1$ or $0$. Note that $||\mathbf{v}_{j}||=1$ only when one of the leaf-nodes under $U_j$ is activated. In this way, the or-node can adaptively activate the different leaf-nodes to capture the diverse local shape variance. It is worth mentioning that the cost of locating the or-node is independent of the selected leaf-nodes because we assume the leaf-nodes belong to the same part (i.e. or-node) act a nearby location.
Thus, the response of the or-node $U_j$ is defined as,
\begin{equation} \label{eq:or-node_score}
\mathcal{R}_{j}^{u}(X,p_0,p_j,\mathbf{v}_{j}) \!\! = \!\!\! \sum_{i \in ch(j)} \mathcal{R}_{i}^{l}(X,p_j) \cdot v_i \!-\! D_{j}(p_0,p_j).
\end{equation}
\begin{figure}[!htb]
\centering
\epsfig{figure=Context_Feature.pdf,width=0.22\textwidth}
\caption{The spatial contextual features defined for the collaborative edges. }\label{fig:context_feature}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure*}[!htb]
\centering
\epsfig{figure=AoG_Vector.pdf,width=0.70\textwidth}
\caption{Mapping the latent And-Or graph with the discriminative function defined in Equation~\ref{eq:AOG_score}. Different layers of nodes in our model are associated with certain bins in the feature vector $\phi(X,H)$ (at the bottom). The activated leaf-nodes are highlighted in red, and the feature bins are set to zeros for the other inactivated nodes. The embedded latent variables $H = (P, V)$ make our model reconfigurable during detection. }\label{fig:AoG_feature}
\end{figure*}
\begin{table*}[htbp]
\centering\begin{tabular*}{0.85\textwidth}{ p{0.2\textwidth} p{0.7\textwidth} l l}
\toprule
Symbol & Meaning \\
\midrule
$\{A_r\}_{r=1}^m$ & The and-nodes. \\
$\{U_j\}_{j=m+1}^{ (z+1)\cdot m}$ & The or-nodes. \\
$\{L_i\}_{i=m'}^{n'}$ & The leaf-nodes. \\
$X$ & The edge map of an image. \\
$P = \{p_0, p_j, p_i\}$ & The locations of the root-node $p_0$, or-nodes $p_j$, and leaf-nodes $p_i$. \\
$\mathcal{R}^l_i(X, p_i)$ & The response of the classifier associated with leaf-node $L_i$ located at $p_i$. \\
$\mathcal{R}^u_j (X, p_0, p_j, \mathbf{v}_j)$ & The response of the or-node. $\mathbf{v}_j$ indicates the selection of its child leaf-nodes. \\
$\mathcal{R}^a_r(C_r)$ & The response of the and-nodes, which provides a global verification for the shape $C_r$. \\
$\mathcal{R}^{e}_r (P, \{\mathbf{v}_j\}) $ & The response of the collaborative edges. $ \{\mathbf{v}_j\} $ indicates the selection of the leaf-nodes.\\
$\mathcal{R}^G (X, P, V)$ & The response of the whole model, where $P$ and $V$ represent the latent variables. \\
$H = (P, V)$ & All latent variables (including positions $P$ and activation variables $V$) of our model. \\
\bottomrule
\end{tabular*}
\vspace{3mm}
\caption{Notation summary of this work.}\label{table:notation}
\end{table*}
\textbf{And-node:} The and-node, $A_r$, performs a global verification for the whole shape. For each and-node, we have a set of contour fragments, $C_r=\{c_1, c_2, ...,c_z\}$, which are determined by its child or-nodes. Then we adopt the Shape Context descriptor~\cite{ShapeContext} to describe these contours as a whole, $\phi^{a}(C_r)$. Thus, we define the and-node's response as,
\begin{equation} \label{eq:and_score}
\mathcal{R}^{a}_{r} (C_r) = \omega^{a} \cdot \phi^{a}(C_r),
\end{equation}
where $\omega^{a}$ is the corresponding parameter vector.
\textbf{Collaborative Edge:} We impose contextual interactions among shape parts based on the collaborative edges. Given any two different or-nodes associated with the same and-node, we link an edge between them and their child leaf-nodes inherit the edge.
We define the collaborative edges using the spatial contextual features, as Figure~\ref{fig:context_feature} illustrates.
Suppose one edge connects two leaf-nodes $(L_i, L_{i^{\prime}})$ are located at $p_i$ and $p_{i^{\prime}}$ respectively. We collect a $4$-bin feature $\psi (p_i, p_{i^{\prime}})$ for the two leaf-nodes according to their spatial layout. Each bin of $\psi (p_i, p_{i^{\prime}})$ represents one of the four relations of $(L_i, L_{i^{\prime}})$: {\em clockwise}, {\em anti-clockwise}, {\em near}, and {\em far}. In Figure~\ref{fig:context_feature}, the bold rectangle in the center indicates the location of $L_i$, which is connected to the red bold rectangle indicating the location of $L_{i^{\prime}}$. The dashed line represents the initial layout of the two leaf-nodes, and the red solid line is the adjusted actual layout in detection. Specifically, we define the relations as
\begin{itemize}
\item {\em Near and Far}: If $L_{i^{\prime}}$ falls into the outer dashed rectangle, it is {\em near} to $L_i$, i.e. the bin of {\em near} is activated (i.e. being set as $1$); otherwise it is {\em far} from $L_i$.
\item {\em Clockwise and Anti-clockwise}: One of the two relations is activated (i.e. being set as $1$) according to the angle between the dashed line and the solid red line.
\end{itemize}
These relations intuitively encode the spatial contexts of two leaf-nodes $(L_i, L_{i^{\prime}})$. Let $\{\mathbf{v}_j\}$ represent the activation variables of the leaf-nodes, and we denote $P$ as a vector of the positions of all or-nodes $U_j$. $P$ also specifies the locations $\{ p_i \}$ of the activated leaf-nodes. The response of the collaborative edge is then parametrized as
\begin{equation}\label{eq:CRF_score}
\mathcal{R}^{e}_r (P, \{\mathbf{v}_j\}) = \sum_{j \in ch(r)} \sum_{i \in ch(j)} \sum_{i^{\prime} \in \partial(i)} \omega_{(i,i^{\prime})}^{e} \cdot \psi (p_i, p_{i^{\prime}}) \cdot v_i \cdot v_{i^{\prime}},
\end{equation}
where $\partial(i)$ represents the set of neighbor leaf-nodes of $L_i$, and each neighbor has a different parent node with $L_i$. $\omega_{(i,i^{\prime})}^{e}$ is the corresponding weight. $v_i$ and $v_{i^{\prime}}$ are the activation indicators for $L_i$ and $L_{i^{\prime}}$, respectively, as the edges are imposed only for the activated leaf-nodes.
\begin{figure*}[!htb]
\centering
\epsfig{figure=Illustrate_Inference.pdf,width=6.5in}
\caption{ Illustration of the inference procedure. (a) shows local testing for detecting contour fragments within the edge map; the blue dashed boxes represent perturbed blocks associated with the leaf-nodes. (b) shows a hypothesis of detection including candidates (indicated by the red boxes) proposed by all or-nodes, in which the collaborative edges are imposed. (c) shows the global verification, in which the ensemble of contours are measured as a whole.}\label{fig:inference}
\end{figure*}
\textbf{Root-node:} The root-node on the top alternatively activates one of its child and-nodes, whose definition is similar with that of the or-node. Also, we use a variable $v_r \in \{0,1\}$ to specify the activation of each and-node $A_r$, and the indicator vector for the root-node is $\mathbf{v}_0 = \{v_{r}\}_{r=1}^m$ and $||\mathbf{v}_0|| = 1$, i.e. only one child is selected.
Let $P$ imply the part-based deformation with or-nodes, and $V=(\mathbf{v}_0, \{\mathbf{v}_j\})$ imply the selection of and-nodes and leaf-nodes, the overall response of our model is then defined as:
\begin{eqnarray} \label{eq:AOG_score}
&&\mathcal{R}_{G}(X,P,V) = \nonumber\\ \!\! && \!\! \sum_{r=1}^{m} v_r \! \cdot \! ( \!\! \sum_{j \in ch(r)} \! \mathcal{R}^u_j(X, p_0, p_j,\textbf{v}_{j}) \!+ \! \mathcal{R}^e_r (P, \{\mathbf{v}_j\}) \!+\! \mathcal{R}^a_r(C_r) ). \nonumber\\
\end{eqnarray}
In this model, $H = (P, V)$ are the latent variables that will be adaptively estimated in testing. For notation simplicity, our model in Equation (\ref{eq:AOG_score}) can be re-written as :
\begin{equation}\label{eq:sim_score_infer}
\mathcal{R}_{G}(X, H) = \omega \cdot \phi(X,H),
\end{equation}
where $\phi(X,H)$ represents the concatenated feature vector for all nodes and edges in the model, and $\omega$ includes all of the parameters corresponding to $\phi(X,H)$. Figure~\ref{fig:AoG_feature} illustrates our And-Or graph model mapped with the discriminative function.
We summarize the symbols used in our model in Table \ref{table:notation}.
\section{Inference}\label{sec:inference}
Given the edge map $X$ extracted from the image, the inference task is to detect the optimal contour fragments within the detection window scanned over an image pyramid. The detection is a search procedure to activate nodes from bottom to top, in which a number of hypotheses are generated and each one specifies a configuration of detected contour fragments. We verify the hypotheses and prune the unlikely ones by maximizing the model response defined in Equation (\ref{eq:sim_score_infer}).
We conduct the inference algorithm with the following steps. An example illustrating the inference procedure using our model is presented in Figure~\ref{fig:inference}.
\textbf{Local testing:} We use all of the leaf-nodes (i.e. the local contour classifiers) to search for optimal contour fragments within the edge map $X$. Assume that one or-node $U_j$, associated with a partitioned block in the detection window, contains a number of leaf-nodes $\{ L_i, i \in ch(j) \}$, and that the initial position of $U_j$ is $p'_j$. Each $U_j$ is allowed to slightly perturb its location. At each location $p'_j+ \delta $, we treat all of the contours that have fallen into the block as the inputs to every leaf-node of $U_j$, as Figure~\ref{fig:inference}(a) illustrates. By maximizing the response in Equation (\ref{eq:leaf-node_score}), each leaf-node $L_i \in ch(j)$ can find an optimal contour at a certain location. Recall that each or-node can activate only one of the child leaf-nodes. Thus, the possibility of different leaf-node selections can generate a batch of detection hypotheses. In particular, we denote $\hat{H}$ as the latent variables for one hypothesis, and denote $(\mathbf{\hat{v}}_{j}, \hat{p_j})$ for a possible activation of $U_j$, where $\mathbf{\hat{v}}_{j}$ indicates the leaf-node selection and $\hat{p_j}$ is the location. The cost of $(\mathbf{\hat{v}}_{j}, \hat{p_j})$ is then measured by the function $\mathcal{R}_{j}^{u}$ defined in Equation (\ref{eq:or-node_score}).
\textbf{Binding testing:} The hypotheses from the local testing are further weighed and filtered by imposing the collaborative edges. In each hypothesis, each or-node proposes one leaf-node, and any two leaf-nodes derived from different or-nodes are connected by an edge. We measure the score by the potential function in Equation (\ref{eq:CRF_score}).
In this way, each detection hypothesis is scored by the two testing steps, as,
\begin{eqnarray}\label{eq:testing}
S_{r}^{l}(X, \hat{H}) = \sum_{j \in ch(r)} \mathcal{R}_{j}^{u}(X,p_0,\hat{p_j}, \mathbf{\hat{v}}_{j}) + \mathcal{R}^{e}_r (\hat{P}, \{ \mathbf{\hat{v}}_j \}),
\end{eqnarray}
where $\hat{P} = \{ \hat{p_j} \}$ denotes the locations of all of the or-nodes. In practice, we can prune some of the hypotheses by setting a threshold on the score.
\textbf{Global verification:}
In this step, we apply the and-nodes to re-score the hypotheses of detection. For any hypothesis, we obtain an ensemble of contours, $\hat{C_r} = \{ \hat{c}_1, \hat{c}_2, \dots, \hat{c}_z \}$, each of which is proposed by one or-node. We can measure the contours as a whole by $ S_{r}^{g} (X,\hat{H}) = \mathcal{R}^{a}_{r} (\hat{C_r})$ in Equation (\ref{eq:and_score}), as Figure \ref{fig:inference}(c) illustrates.
Afterwards, the root-node determines the optimal detection by selecting the maximum aggregated score, as
\begin{equation}\label{eq:global}
H^* = \arg\max_{\hat{H}} \sum_{r=1}^{m} (S_{l}(X,\hat{H}) + S_{r}^{g} (X,\hat{H}) )\cdot \mathbf{\hat{v}}_0,
\end{equation}
where $|| \mathbf{\hat{v}}_0 || = 1$ constrains only one of the and-nodes selected by the root-node.
The overall inference procedure appears in Algorithm \ref{alg:inference}.
\begin{small}
\begin{algorithm}[htb]
\caption{Inference with the And-Or graph representation}
\label{alg:inference}
\begin{algorithmic}\footnotesize
\REQUIRE ~~\\
$X$: the edge map extracted from the test image.
\ENSURE ~~\\
$H^*$: the optimal detection with the maximal detection score $\mathcal{R}_{G}(X, H^*)$.
\vspace{1.3em}
\textbf{Local testing}:
\STATE 1. Apply leaf-nodes to detect all possible local contour fragments.
\STATE 2. Generate a batch of detection hypotheses via the or-nodes.
\textbf{Binding testing}:
\STATE 1. Impose the collaborative edges between leaf-nodes in each detection hypothesis.
\STATE 2. Score the hypotheses by Equation (\ref{eq:testing}).
\STATE 3. Prune unlikely hypotheses by thresholding the score.
\textbf{Global verification}:
\STATE 1. For each hypothesis, the local contours are measured as a whole via the and-nodes.
\STATE 2. Aggregate all potentials via the root-node in Equation (\ref{eq:global}).
\STATE 3. Merge results by non-maximum suppression over all image positions and scales.
\end{algorithmic}
\end{algorithm}
\end{small}
\section{And-Or Graph Learning}\label{sec:learning}
We formulate the And-Or graph model learning as a joint optimization task of model structures and parameters. To achieve this goal, we present a novel structure learning algorithm extended from the existing non-convex optimization methods~\cite{CCCP,ShapeNIPS2012}. This algorithm optimizes the objective in a dynamical manner: the latent structures $H = (P,V)$ are iteratively determined along with the parameter learning in each step. For example, new leaf-nodes are created or removed to better adapt to the training data by adjusting the latent variables. One instance of our learning procedure is illustrated in Figure~\ref{fig:structure}: from (a) to (b), a leaf-node associated with $U_1$ is removed and a new leaf-node under $U_6$ is created in (c).
\begin{figure*}[!htb]
\centering
\epsfig{figure=structure_4.pdf,width=0.9\textwidth}
\caption{Illustration of the structure reconfiguration. Parts of the model, two or-nodes ($U_1,U_6$), are visualized in three intermediate steps. (a) The initial structure, i.e. the regular layout of an object. Two new structures are dynamically generated during the iterations. (b) A leaf-node associated with $U_1$ is removed. (c) A new leaf-node is created and assigned to $U_6$.
}\label{fig:structure}
\end{figure*}
\subsection{Optimization Formulation}
Suppose we have a set of positive and negative training samples $(X_1,y_1)$,...,$(X_N,y_N)$, where $X$ is the edge map and $y=\pm 1$ is the label indicating positive and negative samples. We assume that the samples indexed from $1$ to $K$ are the positive samples, and that the feature vector for each sample $(X,y)$ is,
\begin{equation}\label{eq:feature_phi}
\qquad \phi(X,y,H) =
\left\{
\begin{array}{lr}
\phi(X,H) & \mbox{if } y = +1 \\
0 & \mbox{if } y = -1\\
\end{array}
\right.,
\end{equation}
where $H$ represents the latent variables and $\phi(X,H)$ the overall feature vector of the And-Or graph model. Then we pose the And-Or graph learning as optimizing model parameters along with the latent structures,
\begin{equation} \label{eq:discriminative_fun}
\omega = argmax_{y,H} (\omega \cdot \phi(X,y,H)).
\end{equation}
We further transfer this target into a maximum margin formulation,
\begin{align} \label{eq:learn_opt}
\min_{\omega} \frac{1}{2} \| \omega \|^2 & + \lambda \sum_{k=1}^N[\max_{y,H}(\omega \cdot \phi(X_k,y,H) + \mathcal{L}(y_k,y,H)) \nonumber\\
& - \max_H (\omega \cdot \phi(X_k,y_k,H))],
\end{align}
where $\lambda$ is a penalty weight (set as 0.005 empirically), and $\mathcal{L}(y_k,y,H)$ is the loss function. In our implementation, we define that $\mathcal{L}(y_k,y,H) = 0$ if $y_k = y$, and 1 otherwise.
The target energy in Equation (\ref{eq:learn_opt}) is non-convex making it difficult to be solved analytically. In this work, we propose the Dynamical Structural Optimization (DSO) method to iteratively optimize this objective based on the Concave-Convex Procedure (CCCP) method~\cite{CCCP}.
\subsection{Dynamical Structural Optimization}
Following the CCCP method~\cite{CCCP}, we convert the objective function in Equation (\ref{eq:learn_opt}) into a convex and concave form as,
\begin{align}\label{eq:cccp_f}
\quad \min_{\omega}[ \frac{1}{2} \|\omega \|^2
& + \lambda \sum_{k=1}^N \max_{y,H}(\omega \cdot \phi(X_k,y,H) + \mathcal{L}(y_k,y,H))] \nonumber\\
& - [\lambda \sum_{k=1}^N \max_{H} (\omega \cdot \phi(X_k,y_k,H))] \\
& = \min_{\omega} [f(\omega) - g(\omega)],\label{eq:opt_target}
\end{align}
where $f(\omega)$ represents the first two terms, and $g(\omega)$ represents the last term in (\ref{eq:cccp_f}). Assume $\omega^t$ is the solution for the $t$-th iteration. The solution $\omega^{t+1}$ for the next iteration can be solved by subjecting it to
\begin{equation}
\nabla f(\omega^{t+1}) = \nabla g(\omega^t).
\end{equation}
A geometric explanation of CCCP is presented in Figure~\ref{fig:CCCP}, where $\nabla g(\omega^t)$ can be regarded as a hyperplane (the red line) at $\omega^t$ (the black spot) to upper bound $- g(\omega)$. $\nabla g(\omega^t)$ can be solved analytically once $H$ is fixed. Then, the $\omega^{t+1}$ can be estimated accordingly by minimizing $f(\omega^{t+1})$. Please refer to~\cite{CCCP} for the theoretical background.
During the training procedure, the model parameters $\omega^t$ and latent structures $H^t$ are iteratively updated. To discover the models structures, we add one step called model reconfiguration in each iteration. Recall that the model structures (e.g. graph nodes) are mapped with the feature vectors, as Figure~\ref{fig:AoG_feature} illustrates. In this step, from the feature vectors of all positive training examples, we first extract the sub-vectors that are corresponding to different nodes (i.e. and-nodes or leaf-nodes), and each node, we perform clustering on these sub-vectors, respectively. Then, according to the clustering results, we rearrange each feature vector by placing the sub-vectors back into the feature vectors (e.g. re-assigning contour fragments to leaf-nodes). Consequently, the new model structures can be generated. Our DSO method iteratively performs with three following steps: (i) estimate the latent variables of training samples; (ii) reconfigure the model structures; (iii) update model parameters for the new structures.
\begin{figure}[!htb]
\centering
\epsfig{figure=CCCP.pdf,width=0.35\textwidth}
\caption{Geometric illustration of the CCCP procedure. The target energy is decomposed into two functions, $f(\omega)$ and $g(\omega)$. At each step of iteration, a hyperplane (represented by the red line) is calculated as the upper-bound at $\omega^t$ for optimizing $\omega^{t+1}$. }\label{fig:CCCP}
\end{figure}
{\bf (I)} The model parameters $\omega_t$ in the previous iteration are fixed. We find a hyperplane $q_t$ to upper bound $-g(\omega)$ in Equation (\ref{eq:opt_target}),
\begin{equation}\label{eq:CCCP_cons}
-g(\omega) \leq -g(\omega_t) + (\omega-\omega_t) \cdot q_t, \forall \omega.
\end{equation}
The optimal latent variables $H_k^{*}$ are specified for each positive training example by,
\begin{equation}\label{eq:latentH_comp}
H_k^* = argmax_{H} (\omega_{t} \cdot \phi(X_k,y_k,H)).
\end{equation}
Note that we only take the positive training examples into account as $\phi(X_k,y_k,H) = 0$ when $ y_k = -1$. That is, we apply the current model to perform detections on the training samples, and the hyperplane is constructed as
\begin{equation}\label{eq:hyperplane}
q_t = - \lambda \sum_{k=1}^N \phi(X_k,y_k,H_k^*).
\end{equation}
{\bf (II)}
In the second step, we optimize the model structures based on the estimated latent variables $H^*$. All graph nodes in our model are mapped with several feature bins (i.e. sub-vectors) of $\phi(X_k,y_k,H_k^*)$ for all of the training samples, as Figure~\ref{fig:AoG_feature} illustrates. Hence, we achieve the model reconfiguration process by rearranging $\phi(X_k,y_k,H_k^*)$. For example, we can remove leaf-node $L_j$ by setting the corresponding bins for $L_j$ into zeros. Specifically, two sub-steps are sequentially performed to generate and-nodes and leaf-nodes, respectively.
{\bf (i) Global structure reconfiguration.} In the layer of and-nodes, we perform clustering on the feature vectors corresponding to the and-nodes, i.e. the global shape features defined in Equation (\ref{eq:and_score}). Note that each vector is a part of $\phi(X_k,y_k,H_k^*)$. The training object shapes detected by the same and-node are initially grouped into one cluster. We then perform clustering on all of the feature vectors by using ISODATA with Euclidean distance. Based on the clustering result, we rearrange the feature vectors mapping with the and-nodes. For example, if one vector is grouped into a new cluster $\Omega_r$, we shall move it into the bins corresponding to And-node $A_r$, and set its original bins as zeros. In our implementation, we fix the number of and-nodes as $m$, to simplify the computation.
{\bf (ii) Local structure reconfiguration.} After the global structure reconfiguration, each and-node is associated with a group of training examples. Suppose the and-node $A_r$ includes a number of or-nodes, and every or-node $U_j, j \in ch(r)$ further derives its child leaf-nodes $L_j, i \in ch(j)$. In this step, we configure the part-level structures rooted by $U_j$. Note that this step processes each or-node and its leaf-nodes separately.
Each or-node $U_j$ specifies one part of the whole object shape. Given the training examples associating with $A_r$, we extract the local contour features from $\phi(X_k, y_k, H_k^{\prime})$, which are corresponding to the shape part of $U_j$. Then we perform clustering on these vectors, and rearrange these vectors in $\phi(X_k, y_k, H_k^{\prime})$, similarly as the operation on the and-nodes. In our implementation, the number of leaf-nodes is not fixed, as the local variances of shapes are usually unpredictable. Thus, there are two specific operators to generate the leaf-nodes according to the clustering.
\begin{itemize}
\item One new leaf-node is created if an extra cluster is generated.
\item One leaf-node is removed if there are very few samples in the corresponding cluster.
\end{itemize}
We present a toy example in Figure~\ref{fig:step2} to illustrate the structure reconfiguration. For the sample $X_3$, a part of its feature vector $ < \phi_5, \ldots, \phi_8> $ is grouped from one cluster into another while the values of the feature bins are moved from $ < \phi_5, \ldots, \phi_8> $ to $ < \phi_1, \ldots, \phi_4> $.
After the reconfiguration, the latent variables for each training example can be re-calculated, and denoted by $H_k^d$, in accordance with the arranged feature vectors (refer to Equation~(\ref{eq:latentH_comp})). We denote the feature vectors for all examples by $\phi^{d}(X_k,y_k,H_k^d)$. Then, the hyperplane is transformed accordingly, $q_t^{d} = - D\sum_{k=1}^N \phi^{d}(X_k,y_k,H_k^d)$.
\begin{figure}[!htb]
\centering
\epsfig{figure=Learning_Step2.pdf,width=0.48\textwidth}
\caption{A toy example for structure reconfiguration. We consider $4$ samples, $X_1, \ldots, X_4$, for training the structure of $U_i$ (or $A_r$). (a) shows the feature vectors $\phi$ of the samples associated with $U_i$ (or $A_r$), and the intensity of the feature bin indicates the feature value. (b) illustrates the clustering performed with $\phi^{\prime}$. The vector $\langle \phi_5, \cdots, \phi_8, \rangle$ of $X_2$ is grouped from cluster 2 to cluster 1. (c) shows the adjusted feature vectors according to the clustering. Note that the model structure reconfiguration is realized by the rearrange of feature vectors, as we discuss in the text. This figure should be viewed in electronic form. }\label{fig:step2}
\end{figure}
{\bf (III)} The newly generated model structures can be represented by the feature vectors $\phi^{d}(X_k,y_k,H_k^d)$, and the model parameters can then be learned by solving Equation (\ref{eq:opt_target}),
\begin{equation}
\omega^d_{t} = argmin_\omega[f(\omega) - g(\omega)]
\end{equation}
By substituting $-g(\omega)$ with the upper bound hyperplane $q_t^{d}$, this optimization task can be transferred as,
\begin{align}
\min_\omega \frac{1}{2} \|\omega\|^2 & + D\sum_{k=1}^N[\max_{y,H}(\omega \cdot \phi(X_k,y,H) + \mathcal{L}(y_k,y,H)) \nonumber\\
& - \omega \cdot \phi^d(X_k,y_k,H_k^{*})].
\end{align}
We solve it as a standard structural SVM problem, as,
\begin{equation}
\omega^* = D \sum_{k,y,H} \alpha_{k,y,H}^* \Delta\phi(X_k,y,H),
\end{equation}
where $\Delta\phi(X_k,y,H) = \phi^d(X_k,y_k,H_k^{*}) - \phi(X_k,y,H)$. We calculate $\alpha^*$ by maximizing the dual form in standard SVM, and we apply the cutting plane method~\cite{CuttingPlane} to solve it.
With the estimated parameters $\omega^d_{t}$, the energy $E(\omega^d_{t})$ can be calculated for the new model, and we then compare it with the previous energy $E(\omega_{t})$ to verify the new model structures. If $E(\omega^d_{t}) < E(\omega_{t})$, we accept the new model structures and have $\omega_{t+1} \leftarrow \omega^d_{t}$. Otherwise, we keep the model structures as in the previous iteration and optimize the model parameters without the structure reconfiguration, i.e. by using $q_t$ instead: $\omega_{t+1} = argmin_\omega[f(\omega) + \omega \cdot q_t]$.
In this way, we ensure that the optimization objective in Equation (\ref{eq:opt_target}) continues to decrease in iterations. Thus, the algorithm keeps iterating until the objective converges.
\subsection{Initialization}
At the beginning of model training, our model can be initialized as follows. For each training example, whose contours have been extracted, we partition it into a regular layout of partitioned blocks, and each block is corresponding to one or-node. The contours that fall into the block are treated as the inputs, and we initially select the one with the largest length if more than one contour are within there. Then, the leaf-nodes are initially generated by clustering the selected contours without any constraints. The and-nodes are initialized by the similar way. We thus obtain the initial feature vectors for all training examples.
Algorithm \ref{alg:Framwork} summarizes the overall algorithm of learning the latent And-Or graph.
\begin{small}
\begin{algorithm}[htb]
\caption{Learning latent And-Or graph model}
\label{alg:Framwork}
\begin{algorithmic}\footnotesize
\REQUIRE ~~\\
positive and negative training samples, \\
$\{X_k,y_k\}^{+} \bigcup \{X_{k^{\prime}},y_{k^{\prime}}\}^{-}, k = 1..K, k^{\prime} = K+1..N$.
\ENSURE ~~\\
The trained And-Or graph model.
\item[\textbf{Initialization:}] ~~\\
\begin{itemize}
\setlength{\itemsep}{1pt}
\setlength{\parskip}{0pt}
\setlength{\parsep}{10pt}
\item[1] Initialize the model structure (the arrangement of nodes).
\item[2] Initialize the latent variables $H$ and model parameters $\omega$.
\end{itemize}
\item[\textbf{repeat}]
\STATE
\begin{itemize}
\setlength{\itemsep}{1pt}
\setlength{\parskip}{0pt}
\setlength{\parsep}{10pt}
\item[1] Estimate the latent variables $H^{*}$ on each positive example $(X_k,y_k)$ with the current model parameters $\omega_t$.
\item[2] Generate the new graph structures.\\
\begin{itemize}
\setlength{\itemsep}{1pt}
\setlength{\parskip}{0pt}
\setlength{\parsep}{10pt}
\item[(a)] Localize the contour fragments for all examples using the current latent variables $H_k^{*}$, and obtain the feature vectors $\phi(X_k,y_k,H_k^{*})$.
\item[(b)] In the layer of and-nodes, perform clustering on the global shape features, and rearrange the feature vectors.
\item[(c)] For each or-node $U_i$, perform clustering on the feature vectors of all its child leaf-nodes.
\item[(d)] Operate on the leaf-nodes to generate a new structure, and the latent variable is updated to $H_k^d$ with the rearranged feature vectors $\phi^d (X_k,y_k,H_k^d)$.
\end{itemize}
\item[3] Update the model parameters $\omega_{t+1}$ .
\begin{itemize}
\setlength{\itemsep}{1pt}
\setlength{\parskip}{0pt}
\setlength{\parsep}{10pt}
\item[(a)] Estimate the parameters $\omega^d_{t}$ with the newly generated structures.
\item[(b)] IF $E(\omega^d_{t}) < E(\omega_{t})$,
\item[] ~~~~ Accept the new model structures, and $\omega_{t+1} \leftarrow \omega^d_{t}$.
\item[] ELSE
\item[] ~~~~ Calculate $\omega_{t+1}$ while keeping the structures in the previous iteration.
\end{itemize}
\end{itemize}
\item[\textbf{until}] {The target function defined in Equation (\ref{eq:opt_target}) converges.}
\end{algorithmic}
\end{algorithm}
\end{small}
\begin{center}
\begin{table}[t]
\centering
\begin{tabular}{ c c c c c c }
\hline
& \textbf{SYSU-Shapes} & \textbf{UIUC-People} & \textbf{INRIA-Horses} & \\
\textbf{and-nodes} & $m = 3 $ & $m = 2$ & $m = 1$ & \\
\textbf{or-nodes} & $z = 6$ & $z = 8$ & $z = 6$ & \\
\textbf{leaf-nodes} & $n \leq 4$ & $n \leq 4$ & $n \leq 4$ &\\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\vspace{3mm}
\caption{Numbers of nodes in the and-or graph models for different databases.}\label{table:graphnodes}
\end{table}
\end{center}
\section{Experiments}\label{sec:experiment}
To validate the advantage of our model, we present a new shape database, SYSU-Shapes\footnote{http://vision.sysu.edu.cn/projects/discriminative-aog/}, which includes elaborately annotated shape contours. Compared with the existing shape databases, this database includes more realistic challenges in shape detection and localization, e.g. cluttered background, large intraclass variation, and different poses/views, in which part of the instances were originally used for appearance-based object detection. We also validate our model on two other public databases: UIUC-People~\cite{UIUCHuman} and INRIA-Horse~\cite{INRIAHorse} and show the superior performances over other state-of-the-art methods.
\begin{figure*}[!htb]
\centering
\epsfig{figure=pr.pdf,width=0.9\textwidth}
\caption{Precision-Recall (PR) curves on the SYSU-Shape dataset.}\label{fig:PR_SYSU_shape}
\end{figure*}
\begin{center}
\begin{table*}[t]
\centering\begin{tabular*}{0.55\textwidth}{ l c c c c c c} \toprule
Method & Airplane & Bicycle & Boat & Car & Motorbike & MeanAP\\
\hline
AOG (full) & \textbf{0.520} & \textbf{0.623 } & \textbf{0.419} & \textbf{0.549} & \textbf{0.583} & \textbf{0.539}\\
AOG (3-layers) & 0.348 & 0.482 & 0.288 & 0.466 & 0.333 & 0.383\\
DPMs & 0.437 & 0.488 & 0.365 & 0.509 & 0.455 & 0.451\\ \bottomrule
\end{tabular*}
\vspace{3mm}
\caption{Detection accuracies on the SYSU-Shape dataset.}\label{table:SYSU_shape}
\end{table*}
\end{center}
{\em Implementation setting.} We extract clutter-free object contours for the positive samples, and the edge maps for the negative samples are extracted using the Pb edge detector~\cite{PbDetector} with an edge link algorithm. For each contour as the input of the leaf-node, we sample $20$ points and compute the contour descriptor for each point. During detection, the edge maps of test images are extracted as for the negative training samples. The objects are searched by sliding windows over $6$ different scales and $2$ per octave, and detections are reported by non-maximum suppression. We adopt the testing criterion defined in the PASCAL VOC challenge: a detection is counted as correct if its overlap with the groundtruth bounding-box is greater than $50\%$.
Our model is able to flexibly adapt to the data by setting the numbers of nodes in each layer: $m$ for and-nodes, $z$ for or-nodes, and $n$ for leaf-nodes. Recall that each or-node in our model indicates a part of object shape, so that we can set the number of or-nodes according to the sizes (scales) of the shape categories. The leaf-nodes are produced during the iterative training, and their numbers can be determined automatically. In the experiments, to reduce computational cost, we fix the number for and-nodes and set an upper limit for the number of leaf-nodes. Table~\ref{table:graphnodes} summarizes the numbers of nodes on the three databases. In the model training, the initial layout for each sample is a regular partition (e.g. $2 \times 4$ blocks for the UIUC-People dataset and $3 \times 2$ for the other two datasets).
If we keep only one and-node (i.e. $m=1$), our model is simplified into a 3-layer structure that is rooted by the and-node. The training procedure (i.e. Algorithm.~\ref{alg:Framwork}) for this structure is kept, but we discard the step of generating and-nodes.
\begin{figure*}[!htb]
\centering
\epsfig{figure=SYSU_Shape_Results.pdf,width=0.6\textwidth}
\caption{A few typical object shape detections generated by our approach on the SYSU-Shape dataset. The localized contours are highlighted in black, and the green boxes and red boxes indicate detected shapes and their parts, respectively. }
\label{fig:SYSU_detection}
\end{figure*}
We conduct the experiments on a workstation with Core Duo 3.0 GHZ CPU and 16GB memory. On average, it takes $4 \sim 8$ hours to train a shape model, depending on the numbers of training examples, and the time cost for detection on an image is around $1 \sim 2$ minutes.
{\bf Experiment I.} We first conduct the experiment on the SYSU-Shape database, which is collected from the Internet and other vision databases. There are $5$ categories, i.e. airplanes, boats, cars, motorbikes, and bicycles, and each category contains $200\sim 500$ images. The shape contours are carefully labeled by a professional team using the LabelMe toolkit~\cite{Labelme}. It is worth mentioning that each image has at least but not limited to one object of a given category. For each category, half of the images are randomly selected as positive samples and the rest for testing. The images from the other categories are randomly split into two halves as negative samples for training and testing.
\begin{figure*}[!htb]
\centering
\epsfig{figure=model_human.pdf,width=0.6\textwidth}
\caption{The trained And-Or graph model with the UIUC-People dataset. (a) Visualizes the model of $4$ layers. (b) Exhibits leaf-nodes associated with or-nodes, $U_1, \ldots, U_8$. A real detection case with the activated leaf-nodes are highlighted in red. }
\label{fig:exp1}
\end{figure*}
\begin{figure*}[!htb]
\centering
\epsfig{figure=Results_UIUCPeople.pdf,width=0.6\textwidth}
\caption{A few typical object shape detections generated by our method on the UIUC-People database~\cite{UIUCHuman}. The localized contours are highlighted in black, and the green boxes and red boxes indicate detected peoples and parts, respectively. Two failure detections are indicated by the blue boxes.}\label{fig:Results_UIUC}
\end{figure*}
For comparison, we apply the well acknowledged deformable part-based models (DPMs)~\cite{LatentSVM} on this database, where we modify the released code by replacing the input feature with our shape descriptor, and keep the other settings. In this implementation, $3$ DPMs are merged into a mixture, which accounts for different object views. Moreover, we simplify the model into a 3-layer configuration by setting $m = 1$, and test its performances. Figure ~\ref{fig:PR_SYSU_shape} shows the Precision-Recall curves for all $5$ categories, and the Average Precision values are reported in Table~\ref{table:SYSU_shape}. Our complete model achieves the best mean AP and the best APs for all $5$ categories, and the results clearly demonstrate the benefit of using the layered And-Or structures. Several representative detection results are exhibited in Figure~\ref{fig:SYSU_detection}.
\begin{figure*}[!htb]
\centering
\epsfig{figure=Results_INRIAHorse.pdf,width=1.0\textwidth}
\caption{Results on the INRIA-Horse database. (a) shows several detected shapes by our method, where the localized contours are highlighted in black, and two failure detections are indicated by the blue boxes. (b) shows the quantitative results with the recall-FPPI measurement. }\label{fig:Horse_fppi}
\end{figure*}
\begin{center}
\begin{table}[t]
\centering\begin{tabular*}{0.3\textwidth}{ p{3cm}p{1.1cm} l c } \toprule
Method & Accuracy \\
\hline
AOG model & \textbf{0.708} \\
Wang et al.~\cite{HierarchicalPoslets} & 0.668 \\
Andriluka et al.~\cite{HumanExp1} & 0.506 \\
Felz et al.~\cite{LatentSVM} & 0.486 \\
Bourdev et al.~\cite{HumanExp2} & 0.458 \\ \bottomrule
\end{tabular*}
\vspace{3mm}
\caption{Comparisons of detection accuracies on the UIUC-People dataset.}\label{table:UIUC}
\end{table}
\end{center}
{\bf Experiment II.} The UIUC-People dataset contains $593$ images ($346$ for training, $247$ for testing) that are very challenging due to large shape variations caused by different views and human poses. Most of the images contain people playing badminton. The existing methods~\cite{HierarchicalPoslets,HumanExp2} that are tested on this dataset usually rely on rich appearance-based image features and/or manually labeled prior models. To the best of our knowledge, this work is the first shape-based detector to achieve comparable performances on this dataset. Figure~\ref{fig:exp1}(a) shows the trained And-Or model (AOG), which includes $2$ and-nodes and $8$ or-nodes, and each or-node is associated with $2 \sim 4$ leaf-nodes. Since most of the images contain one person, we only consider the detection with the highest score on an image for all of the methods. Table~\ref{table:UIUC} reports the quantitative detection accuracies generated by our method and the competing approaches~\cite{HierarchicalPoslets,HumanExp1,HumanExp2,LatentSVM}. The results (except ours) come from~\cite{HierarchicalPoslets}. A number of representative detection results are presented in Figure~\ref{fig:Results_UIUC}, where the localized contours are highlighted in black, and the green boxes and red boxes indicate detected human and parts, respectively. We also present several inaccurate detections indicated by the blue boxes in Figure~\ref{fig:Results_UIUC}. There are two main reasons for the failure cases: (i) False positives are sometimes created by the background contours segments that appear like the objects-of-interest very much. (ii) The object contours are insufficiently discriminative for recognition, particularly with unconventional object poses and views.
{\bf Experiment III.} The INRIA Horse dataset comprise $170$ horse images and $170$ images without horses. The challenges of this dataset arise from background clutter and large deformations, and some of the images contain more than one horse. Following the common experiment setting, we use $50$ positive examples and $80$ negative examples for training and the remaining $210$ images for testing.
Some typical shape detection results on the INRIA Horse dataset are shown in Figure~\ref{fig:Horse_fppi}(a). Compared with existing approaches, we use the recall-FPPI (false positive per image) curves for evaluation, as Figure~\ref{fig:Horse_fppi}(b) reports. It is shown that our approach (denoted as AOG) substantially outperforms the competing methods. Our model achieves detection rates of $89.6\%$ at $1.0$ FPPI; in contrast, the results of competing methods are: $87.3\%$ in ~\cite{VotingECCV2010}, $85.27\%$ in~\cite{MalikCVPR2009}, $80.77\%$ in~\cite{PAS}, and $73.75\%$ in~\cite{FerrariIJCV09}.
{\bf Empirical analysis.} For further evaluation, we present two empirical analysis under different model settings as follows.
(I) We validate the benefit of the contextual collaborative edges. Our model can be further transferred into a tree structure by removing the interactions, which is denoted as ``And-Or Tree (AOT)''. On the UIUC-People dataset, the detection accuracy of the AOT model is $0.69$, which is lower than the complete form of our model, but it is also comparable to the state-of-arts. On the INRIA-Horse dataset, we also present the results yielded by the AOT model in Figure~\ref{fig:Horse_fppi}(b). Based on these results, we can observe that the collaborative edges effectively boost the detection against disturbing surrounding clutter and occlusions.
\begin{figure}[!ht]
\centering
\epsfig{figure=Iteration_AP.pdf,width=0.5\textwidth}
\caption{Model capabilities during the iterative training. We plot the average-precision (AP) with the increasing iterations: the intermediate performances of our models in the iteration steps. We conduct the experiments on the UIUC-People dataset (on the left) and INRIA Horse dataset (on the right). The results of disabling the collaborative edges are also reported.}\label{fig:AP-iteration}
\end{figure}
(II) To analyze the model capacity during the iterative training, we output the intermediate performance measures of our models in the iteration steps.
We execute the experiments on the UIUC-People and the INRIA-Horse databases. The quantitative results represented by average precisions (APs) are visualized in Figure~\ref{fig:AP-iteration}. We also report the results generated by the models without collaborative edges, i.e. AOT models. We observe that the discriminative capabilities of our model increase proportinately with the iterations, and converge after a few rounds.
\section{Conclusion and Future Work}\label{sec:conclusion}
In this paper, we have introduced, first, a hierarchical and reconfigurable object shape model in the form of an And-Or graph representation. Second, an efficient inference algorithm for shape detection with the proposed model. Third, a principled learning method that iteratively determine the model structures while optimizing multi-layer parameters. We demonstrated the practical applicability of our approach by effectively detecting and localizing object shapes from cluttered edge maps. Our model effectively captured large shape variations in deformation for different views and poses. Experiments were implemented on several very challenging databases, (e.g. SYSU-Shapes, UIUC-People, and INRIA-Horse), and our model outperformed other current state-of-the-art approaches.
There are several directions in which we intend to extend this work. The first is to complement our contour-based features with rich appearance information, thereby adapting our model to more general object recognition. The second is to generalize our model in the context of multiclass recognition and investigate part-based structure sharing among classes. For example, the feet of horse and sheep have similar appearances, and thus can be detected by the same local classifier, that is, we can make local classifiers (i.e. the leaf-nodes in our model) shared across categories. Model sharing will keep the model compact while representing multiple categories. Moreover, the inference algorithm will be revised accordingly, to deal with a large number of candidate compositions.
\bibliographystyle{ieee}
|
\section{Introduction}
Recently, intense interest has developed in the helical magnetic ordering of one-dimensional (1D) systems of local moments coupled to itinerant electrons.
Such systems exhibit a variety of intriguing many-body phenomena, such as spin-Peierls instabilities\cite{Pincus:SSC1971,Braunecker:PRB2010} and induced topological superconductivity,\cite{Choy:PRB2011, Kjaergaard:PRB20120, Klinovaja:PRL2013} which result from the details of magnetism, electronic structure, and electron-electron interactions.
These phenomena may be relevant for a wide variety of physical systems, ranging from magnetic atoms on superconducting~\cite{Choy:PRB2011, Martin:PRB2012, Nadj-Perge:PRB2013, Vazifeh:PRL2013, Simon:PRL2013, Nadj-Perge:Science2014} and normal metal~\cite{Menzel:PRL2012} substrates, to single walled carbon nanotubes~\cite{Braunecker:PRL2009} and semiconductor-based quantum wires.~\cite{Braunecker:PRB2009, Klinovaja:PRL2013, Scheller:PRL2014}
While much of the work in this area so far has focused on static and thermodynamic properties of the 1D helimagnets, a richer understanding may be gained by developing and employing new {\it dynamical} probes for assessing the behaviors of these systems. For example, an interesting self-tuning effect was proposed for systems dominated by a Ruderman-Kittel-Kasuya-Yoshida (RKKY)-type interaction:~\cite{Braunecker:PRL2009, Braunecker:PRB2009, Braunecker:PRB2012, Scheller:PRL2014} the local moments are predicted to order into a spiral arrangement which, through coherent backscattering, gaps out one spin channel of the itinerant electron system for {\it any value} of the electron density.
This remarkable phenomenon was even suggested as providing a route towards realizing topologically protected Majorana bound states in quantum wires.~\cite{Vazifeh:PRL2013, Klinovaja:PRL2013, Simon:PRL2013}
However, because direct probes of magnetization are unavailable for many systems, it can be challenging to positively identify this intriguing magnetic state (necessarily via indirect means).~\cite{Scheller:PRL2014} With further theoretical understanding of dynamical responses, such as typical damping or relaxation times, additional tests (e.g., density quenches which change the preferred ordering wave vector) could be used to clarify the natures of the underlying states.
More generally, magnetization relaxation processes determine the magnetic response to external perturbations as well as to spontaneous thermal fluctuations.
Furthermore, the nature of the magnetic response is crucially important for noise and magnetization dynamics in magnetoelectronic devices.~\cite{Bland:book, Reviews:STT}
A better understanding of the spin dynamics in 1D helimagnets may pave the way for exploring phenomena such as current-driven magnetization dynamics, with potential practical applications beyond those envisaged so far.
Thus, the investigation of microscopic damping mechanisms is essential for developing a thorough fundamental and practical understanding of these exciting new magnetic systems.
\begin{figure}[t]
\centering
\includegraphics[scale=1.0]{Fig1.pdf}
\caption{(Color online). Helimagnet formed in a 1D conductor.}
\label{Fig1}
\end{figure}
Given the motivations above, in this work we investigate the relaxation of 1D helimagnets via the emission of collective
excitations into the interacting itinerant electron system.
Note that the 1D nature of the itinerant system is important -- our theory is meant to describe quasi-1D systems with a single transverse mode at the Fermi energy (e.g., semiconductor quantum wires~\cite{Scheller:PRL2014}).
The elementary excitations of these 1D electronic systems are plasmons, which describe density waves.
Interestingly, previous theoretical works have predicted that electron-electron interactions in such 1D systems may play important roles both in establishing ordering~\cite{Braunecker:PRL2009, Braunecker:PRB2009} and in the relaxation dynamics of weakly-coupled (non-ordered) nuclear spins.~\cite{Kiss:PRL2011, Zyuzin:arxiv}
In this work, we use a bosonization approach to study the non-perturbative effects of electron-electron interactions on the damping of {\it ordered} spins. We find that interactions have a profound effect on damping, leading to an
enhancement of the damping by several orders of magnitude. The damping has a highly non-local character. Consequently, the thermal fluctuations become spatially correlated over the entire sample.
We estimate the characteristic magnetization relaxation times due to this mechanism for two classes of systems: (Ga,Mn)As quantum wires and nuclear helimagnets formed in GaAs quantum wires.
\section{Theory and model}
Our approach is based on the theoretical framework developed for magnetization damping in metallic ferromagnets.~\cite{Brataas:PRL2008, Brataas:PRB2011}
A key ingredient of the model is that the dynamics of the low-lying collective spin excitations
are parametrized by a classical magnetization order-parameter field whose magnitude is assumed to be constant in time and homogeneous in space, while its local orientation is allowed to fluctuate. In this case, the evolution of the spin system can be described by the Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert (LLG) phenomenology:~\cite{Bland:book, Reviews:STT, comment:CoarseGrain}
\begin{eqnarray}
\dot{\mathbf{m}} (z,t) &=& -\gamma \mathbf{m} (z,t) \times [ \mathbf{H}_{\rm eff} (z, t) + \mathbf{h}_T (z,t) ] + \nonumber \\
& & \mathbf{m} (z,t)\times \int { dz' } \boldsymbol{\alpha} (z, z') \dot{\mathbf{m}} (z', t). \label{Eq:LLG}
\end{eqnarray}
Here, the unit vector $\mathbf{m} (z, t)$ parametrizes the local spin-order and is oriented parallel to the magnetization vector $\mathbf{M} (z, t)= M_s\mathbf{m} (z, t)$, $\gamma= g\mu_B/\hbar$ is the gyromagnetic ratio in terms of the g-factor of local spins and the Bohr magneton $\mu_B$, and $\mathbf{H}_{\rm eff}= -\delta F/\delta \mathbf{M}$ is the effective field found by varying the magnetic free energy functional $F[\mathbf{M}]$ with respect to the magnetization.
The quantity $ \mathbf{h}_T (z,t)$ in the first line is a stochastic magnetic field induced by the thermal fluctuations (to be discussed further below).
We assume that the free energy functional stabilizes an equilibrium helimagnetic texture of the form~\cite{Braunecker:PRL2009, Braunecker:PRB2009, Vazifeh:PRL2013, Klinovaja:PRL2013, Menzel:PRL2012}
\begin{equation}
\label{Eq:m0} \mathbf{m}_0 (z)= [\cos (qz), \sin (qz), 0] ,
\end{equation}
where $q$ depends on the ordering mechanism.
Throughout this work, we use coordinate axes with the $z$-axis oriented along the 1D conductor (see Fig.~\ref{Fig1}).
Magnetization relaxation is described by the second-rank Gilbert damping tensor $\alpha_{ij} (z, z')$ in Eq.~\eqref{Eq:LLG}.
We consider magnetization relaxation via excitations of the itinerant electron system.
In this case, the Gilbert damping tensor is given by~\cite{Brataas:PRL2008, Brataas:PRB2011} (see Appendix~\ref{app1} for a derivation)
\begin{eqnarray}
\alpha_{ij} (z, z')= -\frac{4\gamma h_0^2}{\hbar^2 M_s} \lim_{\omega\rightarrow 0} \frac{\Im m\left[ \chi_{ij} ( z, z', \omega) \right] }{\omega}, \label{Eq:alphaExpr}
\end{eqnarray}
where $\chi_{ij} (z, z',\omega)= \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}{ dt}\, \chi_{ij} ( z, z', t) \exp(i\omega t)$ is the Fourier transform of the spin susceptibility of the itinerant electrons,
$\chi_{ij} (z, z',t)= -(i/\hbar) \theta(t) [\hat{s}_i (z,t), \hat{s}_j (z',0)]$.
Here, $\hat{\mathbf{s}} (z,t) = (\hbar/2) \boldsymbol{\psi}^{\dagger} (z, t) \boldsymbol{\sigma} \boldsymbol{\psi}(z, t)$ is the spin-density operator for itinerant electrons, taken in the interaction picture with respect to Hamiltonian (\ref{Eq:Hamiltonian}) below, with the {\it static} magnetization \eqref{Eq:m0}. Above, $\boldsymbol{\sigma}$ is the vector of Pauli matrices and $\boldsymbol{\psi}(z)\!=\![\psi_{\uparrow} (z), \psi_{\downarrow} (z)]$ is the spinor-valued fermionic field operator.
We model the itinerant electrons via the Hamiltonian:
\begin{eqnarray}
H &=& \int { dz}\, \boldsymbol{\psi}^{\dagger} (z) \left[ \frac{\hat{p}_z^2}{2m} + h_0\mathbf{m}(z,t)\cdot\boldsymbol{\sigma} \right] \boldsymbol{\psi}(z) + \label{Eq:Hamiltonian} \\
&&\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\! \frac{1}{2} \iint { dz dz'}\, \psi_{\sigma}^{\dagger} (z) \psi_{\sigma'}^{\dagger} (z') V_{\rm ee} (z-z')\psi_{\sigma'}(z')\psi_{\sigma}(z) ,\nonumber
\end{eqnarray}
where $\hat{p}_z$ is the momentum operator, $V_{\rm ee}$ is the electron-electron interaction potential, and $h_0$ is the magnetic coupling.
Summation over repeated indices is implied.
In the calculation below, we aim to evaluate the Gilbert damping tensor in Eq.~\eqref{Eq:alphaExpr}, using the spin susceptibility for the electronic system described by Eq.~\eqref{Eq:Hamiltonian}, with a fixed chemical potential. Linearizing around the Fermi points, we will develop a Luttinger liquid type description of the nearly helical system, allowing interactions to be taken into account non-perturbatively.
\section{Results}
We now explicitly calculate the Gilbert damping tensor in Eq.~\eqref{Eq:alphaExpr}.
To facilitate calculation of the spin susceptibility, we transform to a non-uniformly rotated frame via the unitary transformation $\boldsymbol{\psi}_u= U(z) \boldsymbol{\psi}$, with $U(z) = e^{i q z \sigma_z/2}$.
This transformation ``untwists'' the helix, rendering the free electron part of the transformed Hamiltonian $H_u= UHU^{\dagger}$ translationally invariant,
\begin{equation}
H_u^{(0)} = \int { dz}\, \boldsymbol{\psi}_u^{\dagger}(z)\! \left[ \frac{\hat{p}_z^2}{2m} - \frac{\hbar q}{2m}\sigma_z \hat{p}_z + h_0 \sigma_x \right]\! \boldsymbol{\psi}_u(z), \label{Eq:Hamiltonian_U}
\end{equation}
while the interaction term is unaffected.
In this representation, the spin susceptibility and the Gilbert damping tensor transform to $\boldsymbol{\chi}_u (z,z',t)= R(z) \boldsymbol{\chi} (z,z',t)R^T(z')$ and $\boldsymbol{\alpha}_u (z,z',t)= R(z) \boldsymbol{\alpha} (z,z',t)R^T(z')$, where $R(z)$ is the SO(3) matrix associated with $U(z)$.
The energy dispersion of $H_u^{(0)}$ is shown in Fig.~\ref{Fig2}; its eigenfunctions are $\boldsymbol{\psi}_{n, k} (z)= \boldsymbol{\eta}_{n, k}\otimes \psi_{n,k} (z)$, where $n\in \left\{ 1,2\right\}$ is the band index, $ \boldsymbol{\eta}_{n, k}$ is the eigenspinor, and $\psi_{n,k} (z)= \exp (ikz)/\sqrt{L}$, for a system of length $L$.
\begin{figure}[t]
\centering
\includegraphics[scale=1.0]{Fig2.pdf}
\caption{(Color online). Energy dispersion of the gauge transformed free-electron Hamiltonian $H_u^{(0)}$. The bosonization is performed by linearizing the dispersion about the Fermi wavevectors $k= \pm k_F$ and fixing
the k-dependent eigenspinors $\boldsymbol{\eta}_r$ to their values at the Fermi energy. }
\label{Fig2}
\end{figure}
In this work, we set the chemical potential in the gap that separates the bands near $k = 0$,
such that the single-particle dispersion in Eq.~\eqref{Eq:Hamiltonian_U} features only a {\it single branch} of right and left moving modes at the Fermi energy.
We neglect interband couplings and write an effective description within the lowest band, linearized
about the Fermi wavevectors $\pm k_F$. We fix the spinor parts of the wave functions to their values at the Fermi energy (Fig.~\ref{Fig2}).~\cite{Comment:OneBand}
To compute the spin-spin susceptibility in the presence of electron-electron interactions, we employ a bosonic description.
As a first step, we express the fermionic field operator (projected into the lowest band) as a superposition of fields representing right (+) and left (-) movers: $\boldsymbol{\psi}_u (z) = \boldsymbol{\psi}_{+} (z) + \boldsymbol{\psi}_{-} (z)$.
The fields $\boldsymbol{\psi}_{r}$ ($r\in \left\{ +, - \right\} $) take the form $\boldsymbol{\psi}_{r} = \boldsymbol{\eta}_{r}\otimes \psi_{r} (z)$, where $\boldsymbol{\eta}_{r}= \boldsymbol{\eta}_{1, r k_F}$ and the spatial part (in terms of the destruction operators $c_{k,r}$) is
$\psi_{r} (z)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{L}} e^{irk_F z}\,\sum_{k} e^{ikz} c_{k,r}$.
Substituting the fermionic field operator into the Hamiltonian $H_u$, performing a Fourier transformation to k-space, and evaluating $V_{ee} (q)$ at momentum zero and $2k_F$ for forward- and back- scattering processes, respectively, we obtain
\begin{equation}
H_u = \sum_{k,r}r\hbar v_F k c^{\dagger}_{k,r} c_{k,r} + \sum_{q,r}( g_2 \rho_{q,r}\rho_{-q,-r} + g_4 \rho_{q,r}\rho_{-q,r}). \label{Eq:Hamiltonian_U2}
\end{equation}
Here, $v_F= \hbar k_F/m - \hbar q \boldsymbol{\eta}^{\dagger}_{+}\sigma_z \boldsymbol{\eta}_{+}/2m$, $g_2= (V_{ee}(0) - |\boldsymbol{\eta}^{\dagger}_{+} \boldsymbol{\eta}_{-}|^2 V_{ee} (2k_F))/2L$, $g_4= V_{ee} (0)/2L$, and $\rho_{q,r}= \sum_{k} c^{\dagger}_{k-q,r} c_{k,r}$ is the Fourier-transformed density operator for right/left-movers.
Following the standard procedure,~\cite{Giamarchi:book} we write Eq.~\eqref{Eq:Hamiltonian_U2} in the bosonized form
\begin{eqnarray}
H_u &=& \frac{\hbar }{2\pi} \int { dz}\, \left[ u_{\rm eff} K (\partial_{z} \theta)^2 + \frac{u_{\rm eff}}{K}(\partial_{z} \phi)^2 \right] , \label{Eq:HBosonized}
\end{eqnarray}
where $\phi$ and $\theta$ are the bosonic fields, $u_{\rm eff}$ is the density wave velocity, and $K$ is the Luttinger parameter.
The bosonic representations of the fermionic fields are
\begin{eqnarray}
\boldsymbol{\psi}_{r} (z)= \boldsymbol{\eta}_{r}\otimes \frac{U_{r}}{\sqrt{2\pi a}} e^{i r k_F z } e^{- i [ r\phi (z) - \theta (z) ]}, \label{Eq:Bosonization}
\end{eqnarray}
where $a$ is an infinitesimal short distance cutoff~\cite{comment1} and $\{U_{r}\}$ are the Klein factors.
The repulsive electron-electron interaction implies that $0 < K \leq 1$, where $K = 1$ for non-interacting electrons.
We calculate the spin susceptibility following the standard approach for Luttinger liquids, see Ref.~\onlinecite{Giamarchi:book} for details.
The resulting (imaginary) time-ordered spin-spin correlation function~\cite{commentM1}, $\tilde{\chi}_{u,ij} (z, z',\tau) = - \langle T_{\tau} \hat{s}_i (z,\tau) \hat{s}_j (z',0) \rangle$,
is diagonal and can be written as $\tilde{\chi}_{u,ii} (\tilde{z},\tau) = \tilde{\chi}^{(0)}_{u,ii} (\tilde{z},\tau) + \tilde{\chi}_{u,ii}^{(2k_F)} (\tilde{z},\tau) \cos (2k_F \tilde{z} ),$ where
\begin{eqnarray}
\tilde{\chi}_{u,ii}^{(0)} &=& - \left(\frac{\hbar}{2\pi}\right)^2 \frac{K^{(i)} \Lambda_{ii}^{++}}{2} \frac{\upsilon^2 - \tilde{z}^2 }{(\tilde{z}^2 + \upsilon^2)^2}, \\
\label{Eq:chiii}\tilde{\chi}_{u,ii}^{(2k_F)} &=& - \left(\frac{\hbar}{2\pi}\right)^2 \frac{\Lambda_{ii}^{+-}}{2a^2} \left( \frac{a^2}{\tilde{z}^2 + \upsilon^2}\right)^K .
\end{eqnarray}
Here, $\tilde{z}= z - z'$, $\upsilon= u_{\rm eff} \tau + a\, {\rm sign}(\tau)$, $K^{(x)}=K^{(y)}=K$, $K^{(z)}= K^{-1}$, and $\Lambda_{ii}^{r r'} = |\boldsymbol{\eta}^{\dagger}_{r}\sigma_i \boldsymbol{\eta}_{r'}|^2$.
The spin susceptibility is $\chi_{u,ii} (\tilde{z},t) = -(2/\hbar)\theta(t) \Im {\rm m} [\tilde{\chi}_{u,ii} (\tilde{z}, t)]$, where $\tilde{\chi}_{u,ii} (\tilde{z}, t)$
is the time-ordered correlation function in {\it real time}, which is obtained via the Wick rotation $\tau= it + 0^{+} {\rm sign} (t)$.
For $K<1$, $\chi_{u,ii}^{(2k_F)}(\omega)/\omega$ diverges in the low-frequency limit.
We regularize the divergence by evaluating the expression at the low-frequency cut-off $\omega_{0}= u_{\rm eff}2 \pi/L$ set by the finite length of the system.~\cite{comment2b}
The analysis above gives the Gilbert damping tensor
\begin{eqnarray}
\alpha_{u,ii} (z,z') &=& \alpha^{(0)}_{u,ii} + \alpha^{(2k_F)}_{u,ii} \cos (2k_F\tilde{z}) , \label{Eq:alpha} \\
\alpha^{(0)}_{u,ii} &=& \frac{ \gamma h_0^2 K^{(i)} \Lambda_{ii}^{++} }{2\pi\hbar M_s u_{\rm eff}^2 } , \label{Eq:alpha_1} \\
\alpha^{(2k_F)}_{u,ii} &=&\frac{\gamma h_0^2 \Lambda_{ii}^{+-} F_{K} \left( \zeta \right) }{ 2^{1/2+K} \pi^{3/2} \hbar M_s u_{\rm eff}^{2} \Gamma (K) } . \label{Eq:alpha_2}
\end{eqnarray}
Here, $\Gamma(K)$ is the gamma function, $\zeta\equiv a \omega_0 / u_{\rm eff}$, and $F_{K} (\zeta) = \pi \zeta^{K - 3/2} [ (I_{K-1/2} (\zeta) - L_{1/2-K}(\zeta)) - 2\zeta \cos (K\pi) \mathcal{K}_{K-1/2} (\zeta) ] $, where $I_{\nu} (\zeta)$ is the modified Bessel function of the first kind, $L_{\nu}(\zeta)$ is the modified Struve function, and $\mathcal{K}_{\nu} (\zeta)$ is the modified Bessel function of the second kind.
To obtain the lab-frame damping tensor, the transformation
$\boldsymbol{\alpha} (z,z',t)= R^T (z) \boldsymbol{\alpha}_u (z,z',t)R(z')$ must be applied.
We continue the analysis in the {\it rotated frame}, where the expressions are much simpler.
\section{Discussion}
Equations~\eqref{Eq:alpha} - \eqref{Eq:alpha_2} are the central results of this work, and describe magnetization relaxation of 1D helimagnets via plasmon excitations.
The damping consists of two parts with very distinct position dependencies: a homogeneous
term $\sim\alpha^{(0)}$ and a rapidly oscillating term $\sim\alpha^{(2k_F)}$. The corresponding highly nonlocal magnetization relaxation caused by the plasmon
excitations differs markedly from the damping of conventional metallic ferromagnets, which is believed to be local.~\cite{CommentM2}
Constraints of the model reduce the number of independent tensor elements.
First, $\Lambda_{yy}^{++}= \Lambda_{zz}^{+-}= 0$ implies that the damping tensor is described by four independent coefficients:
$\alpha^{(0)}_{u,xx}$, $\alpha^{(0)}_{u,zz}$, $\alpha^{(2k_F)}_{u,xx}$, and $\alpha^{(2k_F)}_{u,yy}$.
Second, the constraint $\dot{\mathbf{m}}\cdot\mathbf{m} =0$ imposed by normalization implies
that $\dot{m}_x=0$ in the rotated reference frame (for small $\delta\mathbf{m}$). Thus, the damping is governed by only two coefficients: $\alpha^{(0)}_{u,zz}$ and $\alpha^{(2k_F)}_{u,yy}$.
What are the characteristics of these two independent damping coefficients?
The tensor element $\alpha^{(0)}_{zz}$ originates from forward scattering processes and governs the damping of the long wave-length spin-wave modes.
Similarly, $\alpha^{(2k_F)}_{yy}$ is associated with electronic backscattering, and controls the relaxation of short wave-length modes.
Interestingly, $\alpha^{(0)}_{zz}$ is proportional to the momentum-momentum correlator $\langle \partial_{\tilde{z}}\theta (\tilde{z},\tau) \partial_{\tilde{z}} \theta (0,0) \rangle$, and is thus inversely proportional to the Luttinger parameter $K$. Consequently, electron-electron interaction enhances $\alpha^{(0)}_{u, zz}$ as $K^{-1}$.
A much more complex dependency of the electron-electron interactions is seen in the magnetization damping caused by backscattering processes.
Remarkably, electron-electron interactions may increase $\alpha^{(2k_F)}_{yy}$ by nearly four orders of magnitude compared to its value in the non-interacting limit $K=1$ (Fig.~\ref{Fig3}a).
The tensor element $\alpha^{(2k_F)}_{yy}$ reaches a maximum at $K\approx 0.1$ before it drops quickly to zero in the strongly interacting regime $K\rightarrow 0$.
In this limit, the potential energy $(u_{\rm eff}/K)(\partial_z \phi )^2$ of the bosonic Hamiltonian \eqref{Eq:HBosonized} completely governs the electron dynamics and density variations of the Luttinger liquid become insusceptible to time variations in the magnetization. The dramatic enhancement of $\alpha^{(2k_F)}_{yy}$ is related to the fact that electron-electron interactions make the damping extremely sensitive to $\zeta\sim a/L$, which measures the ratio of the short distance cut-off to the long distance cut-off (Fig.~\ref{Fig3}b).
In the absence of interactions, $\alpha^{(2k_F)}_{yy}$ approaches a constant value in the limit $\zeta \rightarrow 0$. However, with interactions, $\alpha^{(2k_F)}_{yy}$ is singular in this limit and the singularity becomes stronger with increasing strength of the interactions.
\begin{figure}[t]
\centering
\includegraphics[scale=1.0]{Fig3.pdf}
\caption{(Color online). (a) The dimensionless damping parameter $\alpha^{(2k_F)}_{\ast}(K,\zeta)= \alpha^{(2k_F)}_{u,yy}(K, \zeta)/ \alpha^{(2k_F)}_{u,yy}(1,\zeta)$ as a function of the electron-electron interaction parameter $K$ with $\zeta=a \omega_0 / u_{\rm eff}$ fixed at $\zeta= 3.1\times10^{-3}$. (b) The damping parameter as a function of $\zeta$ for different K.}
\label{Fig3}
\end{figure}
To investigate the experimental consequences of Eqs.~\eqref{Eq:alpha}-\eqref{Eq:alpha_2},
we discuss thermal fluctuations and estimate the characteristic relaxation time for two classes of systems which are proposed to hold 1D helimagnetic states.
Additionally, we propose a method for probing the relaxation time in nuclear wires via transport measurements.
The magnetic order is assumed to be to stabilized by the RKKY interaction, implying
$q= k_F$.~\cite{Comment_kf}
The form of the damping tensor has remarkable implications for the statistical properties of thermal fluctuations.
While the average of the stochastic magnetic field $\mathbf{h}_T$ in Eq.~\eqref{Eq:LLG} is zero, $\langle \mathbf{h}_T \rangle = 0$, its correlations (in accordance with the fluctuation-dissipation theorem) are given in the classical (Maxwell-Boltzmann) limit as~\cite{Brown:PR1963, Brataas:PRB2011}
\begin{eqnarray}
\langle h_{T, i} (z,t) h_{T, j} (z',t') \rangle = \frac{2 k_B T}{\gamma M_s} \alpha_{ij} (z, z') \delta (t-t') , \label{Eq:hCorr}
\end{eqnarray}
where $T$ is the temperature and the average $\langle ... \rangle$ is taken over an ensemble in thermal equilibrium.
According to Eq.~\eqref{Eq:hCorr}, the thermal fluctuations are correlated over the entire sample. The fluctuations divide into two distinct classes; one class characterized by a spatially constant correlation and a second class characterized by an oscillating $\sim\cos (2k_F\tilde{z})$ correlation. Strongly correlated thermal fluctuations of this form have not been reported or investigated before in any magnetic system, and
a thorough investigation of how the associated stochastic field $\mathbf{h}_T (z)$ in Eq.~\eqref{Eq:LLG} influences the magnetization dynamics should be an interesting task for future studies.
For a magnetization precessing at frequency $\omega$, Eq.~\eqref{Eq:LLG} yields two characteristic relaxation times $\tau_{\rm rel}^{(0)}$ and $\tau_{\rm rel}^{(2k_F)}$, associated with the homogeneous and oscillatory dissipation terms:
$\tau_{\rm rel}^{(0, 2k_F)} \sim [ \alpha^{(0,2k_F)} L \omega ]^{-1}$.
We now estimate $\tau_{\rm rel}^{(0, 2k_F)}$ for two classes of systems, which are believed to host 1D helimagnetism:~\cite{Klinovaja:PRL2013}
Ga$_{0.98}$Mn$_{0.02}$As quantum wire and GaAs wire in which the nuclear spins are hyperfine coupled
to the itinerant system (see Appendix~\ref{appParaValues} for material parameters). The (Ga,Mn)As and GaAs wire cross sections are assumed to contain $50\times50$ unit cells.
The characteristic magnon frequency of the first excited mode is $\omega= k_B T_c/ \hbar I_{\bot}^{1/(3-2K)}$,~\cite{Braunecker:PRB2009}
where $T_c$ is the critical temperature and $\hbar I_{\bot}$ is the total spin of the cross section.
We assume that each unit cell is fully spin polarized.
For the magnetic (Ga,Mn)As wire, we find $\tau_{\rm rel}^{(0)} = 2.3\times 10^{-8}$~s and $\tau_{\rm rel}^{(2k_F)}= 7.6\times 10^{-11}$~s, while for the nuclear wire
the relaxation times are $\tau_{\rm rel}^{(0)} = 1.0$~s and $\tau_{\rm rel}^{(2k_F)}= 6.4\times 10^{-3}$~s.
Dynamical probes offer new routes for characterizing the nature of 1D helimagnetic systems, providing complementary information to that obtained in static (dc) measurements.
For example, consider the recent experiment of Ref.~\onlinecite{Scheller:PRL2014}, in which the conductance of a GaAs-based quantum wire was observed to drop
from $2e^2/h$ to $e^2/h$ when the temperature was reduced to below 0.1 K.
The appearance of an $e^2/h$ plateau hints at the lifting of spin-degeneracy, and was interpreted as evidence of the formation of a nuclear spin helix.
Importantly, within the model used to interpret the experiment, the spatial period of the helix tunes itself to be equal to half of the Fermi wavelength, i.e., it is directly linked to the density
of the electronic system.
Furthermore, the appearance of an $e^2/h$ plateau is directly linked to this commensuration between the ordering and Fermi wavevectors.
A rapid change of backgate voltage which alters the electron density should thus destroy the commensurability; just after such a quench, one would then expect to observe a conductance of $2e^2/h$, which would gradually return to a value of $e^2/h$ as the nuclear system finds its new equilibrium order, on a timescale set by the magnetic relaxation rate.
Taking similar assumptions and parameter values to those of the model used to support the conclusions of Ref.~\onlinecite{Scheller:PRL2014}, we predict very long relaxation times for the nuclear magnetic order, on the order of milliseconds or more.
Nuclear spin diffusion, another possible important relaxation mechanism, is expected to become effective on longer timescales (see Appendix~\ref{app2}).
Dynamics on such timescales should in principle be observable in experiments, and therefore may provide crucial independent means for verifying the interpretation of the experiment.
In conclusion, we have developed a theoretical formalism for describing magnetization dissipation of 1D helimagnets via the emission of plasmon excitations.
The damping is found to be highly nonlocal and strongly dependent on the electron-electron interaction, differing markedly from the damping of conventional metallic ferromagnets.
\section{Acknowledgements.}
Research supported the Danish National Research Foundation.
MR acknowledges support from the Villum Foundation and the People Programme (Marie Curie Actions) of the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under REA grant agreement PIIF-GA-2013-627838.
|
\section{Introduction}
Stochastic pantograph differential equations(SPDEs) arise widely in control, biology, neural network, and finance, etc. Asymptotic stability of analytical solution has received considerable attention in literature for both deterministic and stochastic functional differential equations. Especially, plenty of literature on stability exist with non-exponential rates decay of the solutions(see \cite{cd}\cite{kx}\cite{mz}\cite{ab}). One important non-exponential rates of decay is polynomially asymptotic stability, which means that the rate of decay is controlled by a polynomial function in mean-square or almost surely sense. This type of stability has been studied in \cite{jg1},\cite{jg2} and \cite{jg3}. Buckwar and Appleby consider the polynomial stability of one dimensional linear stochastic pantograph differential equation in \cite{eb}, where the sufficient conditions of polynomially asymptotic property are given.
The convergence of numerical method is another crucial property of stochastic differential equations. Recently, many researchers devoted to the stochastic delay differential equations. Mao Wei\cite{mw} gave the sufficient conditions of convergence with semi-implicit Euler method for variable delay differential equations driven by Poison random jump measure. Fan studied the approximate solution of linear stochastic pantograph differential equations with Razumikhin technique in \cite{fan}. Baker and Buckwar, in \cite{bb}, also investigated the linear stochastic pantograph differential equations, and the sufficient conditions of convergence of semi-implicit Euler method are obtained.
This article investigates non-linear stochastic pantograph differential equations. It is organised as follows. In section 2, we introduce necessary notations and results on pantograph differential equations. The sufficient conditions of polynomial stability of analytical solutions in the sense of mean-square and almost surely are given in section 3. Finally, both the consistence and convergence of the semi-implicit Euler method are proved, and the orders are achieved.
\section{Preliminary notations and properties of pantograph differential equations}
Throughout this paper, unless otherwise specified, the following notations are used. If $x,y$ are vectors, the inner product of $x,y$ is denoted by $\langle x,y \rangle $=$x^Ty$, and $|x|$ denotes the Euclidean norm of $x\in R^d$. We use $A^T$ to denote the transpose of $A$, if $A$ is a vector or matrix. And if $A$ is a matrix, its trace norm is denoted by $|A|=\sqrt{traceA^TA}$.
Let $(\Omega,P,\mathcal{F})$ be a complete probability space with a filtration $\{\mathcal{F}_t\}_{t\geq0}$ satisfying the usual conditions. Let $0<q<1$, $x(t)=(x_1(t),x_2(t),\cdots,x_d(t))^T\in R^d$ and $B(t)=(B_1(t),B_2(t),\cdots,B_m(t))^T$ be a $m$-dimensional Brownian motion. Suppose $h(x)$ be a function, the derivative of $h(x)$ is defined as $D^+h(x)$, i.e
\begin{equation}\label{2.1}
D^+h(x)=\limsup\limits_{\delta\rightarrow0}\frac{h(x+\delta)-h(x)}{\delta}.
\end{equation}
Before studying the stochastic pantograph differential equations, the properties of deterministic pantograph differential equations are firstly introduced. The equation has the following form:
\begin{equation}\label{2.2}
\left\{
\begin{array}{l}\
x^{\prime}(t)=\bar{a}x(t)+\bar{b}x(qt)
\\x(0)=x_0.
\\
\end{array}
\right.
\end{equation}
\begin{lemma}\cite{eb} Assume $x(t)$ be the solution of (2.2), $x_0>0$, if $\bar{a}<0$, then there exists a constant number $C$ such that
\begin{equation}\label{2.3}
\limsup\limits_{t\rightarrow\infty}\frac{|x(t)|}{t^\alpha}=C|x_0|,
\end{equation}
where $\alpha\in R$ and $\bar{a}+\bar{b}q^\alpha=0$.
\end{lemma}
\begin{remark} ~If there exists a constant number $C>0$, such that
\begin{equation}\label{2.4}
|x(t)|\leq C|x(0)|t^\alpha , ~t\geq0,
\end{equation}
then (2.3) holds.
\end{remark}
\begin{lemma}\cite{eb} Assume $x(t)$ be the solution of equation (2.2), $x_0>0$. If $\bar{b}>0$, $p(t):R^{+}\rightarrow R^+$ is a non-negative continuous function satisfying
\begin{equation}\label{2.5}
D^+p(t)\leq\bar{a}p(t)+\bar{b}p(qt), ~t\geq0,
\end{equation}
and $0<p(0)\leq x(0)$, then $p(t)\leq x(t)$ for all $t\geq0$. Furthermore, if $\bar{a}<0$, and $p(t)$ satisfys (2.5), then there exists a constant $C>0$ such that
\begin{equation}\label{2.6}
p(t)\leq Cp(0)t^\alpha , t\geq0,
\end{equation}
where $\bar{a}+\bar{b}q^{\alpha}=0$.
\end{lemma}
\section{Polynomial stability of analytical solutions for non-linear stochastic pantograph differential equations}
In this section, we consider the following equation
\begin{equation}\label{3.1}
\left\{
\begin{array}{l}\
dx(t)=f(t,x(t),x(qt))dt+g(t,x(t),x(qt))dB(t),~0\leq t\leq T
\\
x(0)=x_0.
\\
\end{array}
\right.
\end{equation}
where $f:[0,T]\times R^d\times R^d \rightarrow R^d$, $g:[0,T]\times R^d\times R^d\rightarrow R^{d\times m}$, $f(t,0,0)=0$, $g(t,0,0)=0$, and $E|x_0|^2<\infty$. It is easy to see there exists zero solution for (\ref{3.1}).
\begin{definition}
The zero solution for (\ref{3.1}) is said to be mean-square polynomial stable, if there exists a constant number $\alpha<0$, such that
\begin{equation}\label{3.2}
\limsup\limits_{t\rightarrow\infty}\frac{logE|x(t)|^2}{logt}\leq\alpha,
\end{equation}
where $x(t)$ is the solution for (\ref{3.1}) with any initial value $x(0)=x_0$.
\end{definition}
\begin{definition}
The zero solution of (3.1) is said to be almost surely polynomial stable, if there exists a constant number $\alpha<0$, such that
\begin{equation}\label{3.3}
\limsup\limits_{t\rightarrow\infty}\frac{log|x(t)|}{logt}\leq\alpha~~a.s.,
\end{equation}
where $x(t)$ is the solution of (\ref{3.1}) with any initial value $x(0)=x_0$.
\end{definition}
\begin{assumption} ~Assume there exist real numbers $a $, $b>0, c>0 ,d>0$, such that the coefficients $f$ and $g$ satisfy
\begin{equation*}
\langle x_1-x_2,f(t,x_1,y)-f(t,x_2,y)\rangle\leq a|x_1-x_2|^2,~~\forall x_1,x_2,y\in R^d, t\geq0;
\end{equation*}
\begin{equation*}
|f(t,x,y_1)-f(t,x,y_2)|\leq b|y_1-y_2|,~~\forall x,y_1,y_2\in R^d, t\geq0;
\end{equation*}
\begin{equation*}
|g(t,x_1,y)-g(t,x_2,y)|\leq c|x_1-x_2|,~~\forall x_1,x_2,y\in R^d, t\geq0;
\end{equation*}
\begin{equation*}
|g(t,x,y_1)-g(t,x,y_2)|\leq d|y_1-y_2|,~~\forall x,y_1,y_2\in R^d, t\geq0.
\end{equation*}
\end{assumption}
According to $f(t,0,0)=0$, $g(t,0,0)=0$ and assumption \ref{3.3}, we can estimate
$$\langle x,f(t,x,y)\rangle\leq (a+\frac{b}{2})|x|^2+\frac{b}{2}|y|^2,~~~|g(t,x,y)|^2\leq 2c^2|x|^2+2d^2|y|^2.$$
\begin{theorem} Suppose that $x(t)$ is the solution of (\ref{3.1}), if the coefficients $f,g$ satisfy assumption \ref{3.3}, and $a+b+c^2+d^2<0$, then the zero solution of (\ref{3.1}) is mean-square polynomial stable.
\end{theorem}
{\bf Proof.} According to definition 3.1, we just need to prove that there exist constant number $C_1$ and $\alpha<0$, such that $E|x(t)|^2\leq C_1t^\alpha$.
It\^{o} formula shows that
\begin{equation}
E(|x(t)|^2)=E(|x_0|^2)+E(\int^t_0[2\langle x(s),f(s,x(s),x(qs))\rangle+|g(s,x(s),x(qs))|^2]{\rm d}s).
\end{equation}
~~~~Let $Y(t)=E(|x(t)|^2)$, then for any $t\geq0$, $t+h\geq0$, we have
\begin{equation*}
\begin{split}
Y(t+h)-Y(t)&\leq 2E(\int^{t+h}_t[(a+\frac{1}{2}b)|x(s)|^2+\frac{1}{2}b|x(qs)|^2]{\rm d}s)+2E(\int^{t+h}_t[c^2|x(s)|^2+d^2|x(qs)|^2]{\rm d}s)\\
&\leq (2a+b+2c^2)\int^{t+h}_tY(s){\rm d}s+(b+2d^2)\int^{t+h}_tY(qs){\rm d}s.
\end{split}
\end{equation*}
Due to
\begin{equation*}
\begin{split}
Y(t)=\limsup\limits_{h\rightarrow0}\frac{\int^{t+h}_0Y(s){\rm d}s-\int^t_0Y(s){\rm d}s}{h},\\
Y(qt)=\limsup\limits_{h\rightarrow0}\frac{\int^{t+h}_0Y(qs){\rm d}s-\int^t_0Y(qs){\rm d}s}{h},
\end{split}
\end{equation*}
thus
\begin{equation}
D^+Y(t)\leq (2a+b+2c^2)Y(t)+(b+2d^2)Y(qt).
\end{equation}
Note that $2a+b+2c^2<0$,~$b+2d^2>0$, by Lemma 2.3, there exists $C_1$ and $\alpha\in R$, such that
\begin{equation}
E(|x(t)|^2)=Y(t)\leq C_1Y(0)t^\alpha=C_1E(|x_0|^2)t^\alpha,
\end{equation}
where $\alpha$ satisfies $2a+b+2c^2+(b+2d^2)q^\alpha=0$. According to $a+b+c^2+d^2<0$, we can know $\alpha<0$, the theorem is proved.
\qed
\begin{theorem} Suppose that $x(t)$ is the solution of (\ref{3.1}), if the coefficients $f,g$ satisfy assumption \ref{3.3}, and $2a+b+2c^2+(b+2d^2)/q<0$, then the zero solution of (\ref{3.1}) is almost surely polynomial stable.
\end{theorem}
{\bf Proof.} According to $2a+b+2c^2+(b+2d^2)/q<0$, we know that $a+b+c^2+d^2<0$ and $E(|x(t)|^2)\leq C_1E(|x(0)|^2)t^\alpha$, where $\alpha<-1$.
By It\^{o} formula and assumption \ref{3.3}, one can show that for any $n-1\leq t\leq n$,
\begin{equation}\label{3.7}
\begin{split}
E(\sup\limits _{n-1\leq t\leq n}|x(t)|^2)&\leq
E(|x(n-1)|^2)+(b+2d^2)E\int^n_{n-1}|x(qs)|^2{\rm d}s+2c^2E\int^n_{n-1}|x(s)|^2{\rm d}s
\\
&~~~+2E(\sup\limits_{n-1\leq t\leq n}\int^t_{n-1}x^T(s)\cdot g(s,x(s),x(qs)){\rm d}B(s)).
\end{split}
\end{equation}
According to Burholder-Davis-Gundy inequations, it is easy to show that
\begin{equation}\label{3.11}
\begin{split}
&~~~~2E(\sup\limits_{n-1\leq t\leq n}\int^t_{n-1} x(s)^{T}\cdot g(s,x(s),x(qs)){\rm d}B(s))
\\
&\leq 8\sqrt{2}E(\int^n_{n-1}| x(s)|^2|g(s,x(s),x(qs))|^2{\rm d}s)^\frac{1}{2}
\\
&\leq 8\sqrt{2}E(\sup\limits_{n-1\leq t\leq n}| x(t)|^2\int^n_{n-1}|g(s,x(s),x(qs))|^2{\rm d}s)^\frac{1}{2}
\\
&\leq E(\frac{1}{2}\sup\limits_{n-1\leq t\leq n}| x(t)|^2+64\int^n_{n-1}|g(s,x(s),x(qs))|^2{\rm d}s)
\\
&\leq \frac{1}{2}E(\sup\limits_{n-1\leq t\leq n}| x(t)|^2)+64E(\int^n_{n-1}(c^2|x(s)|^2+d^2|x(qs)|^2){\rm d}s).
\end{split}
\end{equation}
Substituting (\ref{3.11}) into (\ref{3.7}), then
\begin{equation*}
\begin{split}
E(\sup\limits_{n-1\leq t\leq n}|x(t)|^2)\leq&
2C_1E(|x_0|^2)(n-1)^\alpha +132c^2C_1E(|x_0|^2)\int^n_{n-1}s^\alpha{\rm d}s
\\
&+(2b+132d^2)C_1E(|x_0|^2)q^\alpha\int^n_{n-1}s^\alpha{\rm d}s.
\end{split}
\end{equation*}
It is easy to know $\int_{n-1}^{n}s^{\alpha}{\rm d}s\leq (n-1)^{\alpha}\max(1,2^{\alpha})$. So
\begin{equation*}
E(\sup\limits_{n-1\leq t\leq n}|x(t)|^2)\leq \tilde{C}(n-1)^\alpha.
\end{equation*}
where $\widetilde{C}=[2+132c^2+(2b+132d^2)q^\alpha]C_1E(|x_0|^2)\max(1,2^\alpha)$.
By Markov's inequations, for any $\varepsilon>0$, it is not difficult to show
\begin{equation*}
\begin{split}
&P(\sup\limits_{n-1\leq t\leq n}|x(t)|^2(n-1)^{-1-\alpha-\varepsilon}\geq\gamma)
\\
\leq& \frac{1}{\gamma}\frac{1}{(n-1)^{1+\varepsilon}}\frac{1}{(n-1)^\alpha}E(\sup\limits_{n-1\leq t\leq n}|x(t)|^2)
\\
\leq& \frac{1}{\gamma}\frac{1}{(n-1)^{1+\varepsilon}}\widetilde{C}.
\end{split}
\end{equation*}
By using Borel-Cantelli lemma, the following limit can be achieved
\begin{equation*}
\limsup\limits_{n\rightarrow\infty}\sup\limits_{n-1\leq t\leq n}|x(t)|^2(n-1)^{-1-\alpha-\varepsilon}=0~~~a.s..
\end{equation*}
Note that for any $t>0$, there exists $n(t)$ such that $n(t)-1\leq t\leq n(t)$, and
\begin{equation*}
\lim\limits_{t\rightarrow\infty}\frac{t}{n(t)-1}=1.
\end{equation*}
Hence
\begin{equation*}
\begin{split}
\limsup\limits_{t\rightarrow\infty}|x(t)|^2t^{-1-\alpha-\varepsilon}&\leq
\limsup\limits_{t\rightarrow\infty}(\sup\limits_{n(t)-1\leq s\leq n(t)}|x(s)|^2(n(t)-1)^{-1-\alpha-\varepsilon})\limsup\limits_{t\rightarrow\infty}\frac{t^{-1-\alpha-\varepsilon}}{(n(t)-1)^{-1-\alpha-\varepsilon}})
\\
&=\limsup\limits_{t\rightarrow\infty}(\sup\limits_{n-1\leq s\leq n}|x(s)|^2(n-1)^{-1-\alpha-\varepsilon})\limsup\limits_{t\rightarrow\infty}\frac{t^{-1-\alpha-\varepsilon}}{(n(t)-1)^{-1-\alpha-\varepsilon}})~~~a.s.
\\
&=0.
\end{split}
\end{equation*}
Due to the arbitrary of $\varepsilon$, this can imply
\begin{equation*}
\limsup\limits_{t\rightarrow\infty}\frac{log|x(t)|}{logt}\leq \frac{1+\alpha}{2}.
\end{equation*}
\qed
\section{Consistence and convergence of the semi-implicit method }
In this section, we will employ the semi-implicit Euler methods to solve the equation (\ref{3.1}). We define a family of meshes with fixed step-size on the interval $[0,T]$, i.e.
\begin{equation}\label{4.1}
T_N=\{t_0,t_1,t_2,\cdots,t_N\},~~~~~t_n=nh,~n=0,1,2,\cdots,N,~h=\frac{T}{N}<1.
\end{equation}
Since the points $qt_n$ will probably not be included in $T_N$, so we need another non-uniform mesh which consists of all the points $t_n$ and $qt_n$. Let
\begin{equation}\label{4.2}
S_{N'}=\{0=t_0=s_0,s_1,s_2,\cdots,s_{N'}=T\}.
\end{equation}
For any $l$, we have $s_l=t_n$ or $s_l=qt_m$, where $t_n, t_m\in T_N$. We can also display any $s_l\in S_{N'}$ with $t_n<s_l\leq t_{n+1}$ by
\begin{equation*}
s_l=t_n+\zeta h,~~~~~~\zeta\in (0,1], ~~t_n,t_{n+1}\in T_N.
\end{equation*}
In this paper, we denote by $y(t_n)$ the approximation of $x(t_n)$ at the point $t_n\in T_N$, and $y(qt_n)$ the approximation of $x(qt_n)$ at the point $qt_n\in S_{N'}$, then the semi-implicit Euler method is given by
\begin{equation}\label{4.3}
y(t_{n+1})=y(t_n)+h[(1-\theta)f(t_n,y(t_n),y(qt_n))+\theta f(t_{n+1},y(t_{n+1}),y(qt_{n+1}))]+g(t_n,y(t_n),y(qt_n))\triangle B_n,
\end{equation}
where $y(t_0)=x_0$, $n=0,1,2,\cdots,N-1$, $\triangle B_n=B(t_{n+1})-B(t_n)$, $\theta\in [0,1]$. Here we require $y(t_n)$ to be $\mathcal{F}_{t_n}$-measurable at the point $t_n,n=0,1,\cdots,N$.
We can also express (\ref{4.3}) equivalently as
\begin{equation}\label{4.4}
\begin{split}
y(t_{n+1})=y(t_n)&+\int_{t_n}^{t_{n+1}}[(1-\theta)f(t_n,y(t_n),y(qt_n))+\theta f(t_{n+1},y(t_{n+1}),y(qt_{n+1}))]{\rm d}t
\\
&+\int_{t_n}^{t_{n+1}}g(t_n,y(t_n),y(qt_n)){\rm d}B(t).
\end{split}
\end{equation}
Note that we can't express $y(s_l)$ which equals to $y(qt_{m})$ in(\ref{4.4}), $s_l\in S_{N'}$, so we need a continuous extension that permits the evaluation of $y(s_l)$at any point $s_l=t_n+\zeta h\in S_{N'}$, $\zeta\in (0,1]$, so we define
\begin{equation}\label{4.5}
\begin{split}
y(s_l)=y(t_n)&+\int_{t_n}^{t_n+\zeta h}[(1-\theta)f(t_n,y(t_n),y(qt_n))+\theta f(t_{n+1},y(t_{n+1}),y(qt_{n+1}))]{\rm d}t
\\
&+\int_{t_n}^{t_n+\zeta h}g(t_n,y(t_n),y(qt_n)){\rm d}B(t).
\end{split}
\end{equation}
For any $\theta$ given, $t_n\in T_n$, $\zeta \in (0,1]$, the local truncation error of semi-implicit Euler method for (\ref{3.1}) can be denoted by $\delta_h(t_n,\zeta)$,
\begin{equation}\label{4.6}
\begin{split}
\delta_h(t_n,\zeta)=& x(t_n+\zeta h)-\{x(t_n)+(1-\theta)\int_{t_n}^{t_n+\zeta h}f(t_n,x(t_n),x(qt_n)){\rm d}t
\\
&+\theta\int_{t_n}^{t_n+\zeta h}f(t_{n+1},x(t_{n+1}),x(qt_{n+1})){\rm d}t
\\
&+\int_{t_n}^{t_n+\zeta h}g(t_n,x(t_n),x(qt_n)){\rm d}B(t)\}.
\end{split}
\end{equation}
\begin{definition}
(i) The semi-implicit Euler method is called to be consistent with order $p_1$ in average sense, if there exist constant $C>0$ and $p_1$, which are independent of step size $h$, such that
\begin{equation}\label{4.7}
\max\limits_{0\leq n\leq N-1}\sup\limits_{\zeta\in (0,1]}|E(\delta_h(t_n,\zeta))|\leq Ch^{p_1}~~as~h\rightarrow0.
\end{equation}
(ii) The semi-implicit Euler method is called to be consistent with order $p_2$ in the sense of mean-square, if there exist constant $C$ and $p_2$, which are independent of step size $h$, such that
\begin{equation}\label{4.8}
\max\limits_{0\leq n\leq N-1}\sup\limits_{\zeta\in (0,1]}(E(|\delta_h(t_n,\zeta)|^2))^{\frac{1}{2}}\leq Ch^{p_2}~~as~ h\rightarrow0.
\end{equation}
\end{definition}
For any $\theta$ given, $t_n\in T_n$, $\zeta \in (0,1]$, the global error of semi-implicit Euler method can be denoted by $\epsilon(s_l)$
\begin{equation}\label{4.9}
\epsilon(s_l)=\epsilon(t_n+\zeta h)=x(t_n+\zeta h)-y(t_n+\zeta h).
\end{equation}
\begin{definition}
The semi-implicit Euler method is called to be convergent with order $p$, if there exist constant $C$ and $p$, which are independent of step size $h$, such that
\begin{equation}\label{4.10}
\max\limits_{s_l\in S_{N'}}(E(|\epsilon(s_l)|^2))^\frac{1}{2}\leq Ch^p~~as ~h\rightarrow0.
\end{equation}
\end{definition}
\begin{lemma}\cite{wc}
Assume that there exists a positive constant $K$ such that\\
(i)(Lipschitz condition) For all $t\in [0,T]$, $x_1,x_2,y_1,y_2\in R^d$,
\begin{equation*}
|f(t,x_1,y_1)-f(t,x_2,y_2)|^2\vee|g(t,x_1,y_1)-g(t,x_2,y_2)|^2\leq K(|x_1-x_2|^2+|y_1-y_2|^2),
\end{equation*}
(ii)(Linear growth condition) For all $(t,x,y)\in [0,T]\times R^d\times R^d$,
\begin{equation*}
|f(t,x,y)|^2\vee|g(t,x,y)|^2\leq K(1+|x|^2+|y|^2).
\end{equation*}
Then there exists a unique solution $x(t)$ to (\ref{3.1}), and $E(\sup\limits_{0\leq t\leq T}|x(t)|^2)\leq M$.
\end{lemma}
\begin{remark}~Due to Lipschiz condition and $f(t,0,0)=0,~g(t,0,0)=0$, it is not difficult to know $|f(t,x,y)|^2\leq K(|x|^2+|y|^2)$ and $|g(t,x,y)|^2\leq K(|x|^2+|y|^2).$
\end{remark}
\begin{theorem}~Under the Lipschitz condition, the semi-implicit Euler method for equation (\ref{3.1}) is consistent
(i) with order 1.5 in average sense;
(ii) with order 1 in mean-square sense.
\end{theorem}
{\bf Proof.}~(i) For the equation (\ref{3.1}) and the semi-implicit method (\ref{4.3}), the local truncation error takes the special form:
\begin{equation}\label{4.11}
\begin{split}
\delta_h(t_n,\zeta)=&(1-\theta)\int_{t_n}^{t_n+\zeta h}(f(t,x(t),x(qt))-f(t_n,x(t_n),x(qt_n))){\rm d}t
\\
&+\theta\int_{t_n}^{t_n+\zeta h}(f(t,x(t),x(qt))-f(t_{n+1},x(t_{n+1}),x(qt_{n+1}))){\rm d}t
\\
&+\int_{t_n}^{t_n+\zeta h}(g(t,x(t),x(qt))-g(t_n,x(t_n),x(qt_n))){\rm d}B(t),
\end{split}
\end{equation}
for $n=0,1,2,\cdots,N$. we will frequently make use of H\"{o}der inequality in the next content. Note that $E(|x|)\leq (E(|x|^2))^{\frac{1}{2}}$, so taking expectation and absolute both sides of the equation above, we can estimate
\begin{equation}\label{4.12}
\begin{split}
|E(\delta_h(t_n,\zeta))|\leq&(1-\theta)\int_{t_n}^{t_n+\zeta h}E(|f(t,x(t),x(qt))-f(t_n,x(t_n),x(qt_n))|){\rm d}t
\\
&+\theta\int_{t_n}^{t_n+\zeta h}E(|f(t,x(t),x(qt))-f(t_{n+1},x(t_{n+1}),x(qt_{n+1}))|){\rm d}t
\\
\leq&(1-\theta)K^{\frac{1}{2}}\int_{t_n}^{t_n+\zeta h}[E(|x(t)-x(t_n)|^2)+E(|x(qt)-x(qt_n)|^2)]^{\frac{1}{2}}{\rm d}t
\\
&+\theta K^{\frac{1}{2}}\int_{t_n}^{t_n+\zeta h}[E(|x(t)-x(t_{n+1})|^2)+E(|x(qt)-x(qt_{n+1})|^2)]^{\frac{1}{2}}{\rm d}t.
\end{split}
\end{equation}
By Lemma \ref{4.3}, $h<1$ and the integral we can obtain
\begin{equation*}
E(|x(t)-x(t_n)|^2)\leq(2K(t-t_n)+2K)E(\int_{t_n}^t(|x(t)|^2+|x(qt)|^2){\rm d}t) \leq8KMh.
\end{equation*}
In the same way, we can compute $E(|x(qt)-x(qt_n)|^2)\leq 4KMq(1+q)h$, $E(|x(t)-x(t_{n+1})|^2)\leq 8KMh$ and $E(|x(qt)-x(qt_{n+1})|^2)\leq 4KMq(1+q)h$. Thus
\begin{equation}\label{4.13}
|E(\delta_h(t_n,\zeta))|\leq \int_{t_n}^{t_n+\zeta h}C_1h^{\frac{1}{2}}{\rm d}t=C_1h^{\frac{3}{2}}\zeta\leq C_1h^{\frac{3}{2}}
\end{equation}
where $C_1=K(8M+4Mq(1+q))^{\frac{1}{2}}$.
This implies
$$\max\limits_{0\leq t_n\leq N-1}\sup\limits_{\zeta\in (0,1]}|E(\delta_h(t_n,\zeta))|\leq C_1h^{\frac{3}{2}}.$$
(ii) According to the definition of $\delta_h(t_n,\zeta)$, the following inequality holds.
\begin{equation*}
\begin{split}
E(|\delta_h(t_n,\zeta)|^2)\leq&3(1-\theta)^2E(|\int_{t_n}^{t_n+\zeta h}(f(t,x(t),x(qt))-f(t_n,x(t_n),x(qt_n))){\rm d}t|^2)\\
&+3\theta^2E(|\int_{t_n}^{t_n+\zeta h}(f(t,x(t),x(qt))-f(t_{n+1},x(t_{n+1}),x(qt_{n+1}))){\rm d}t|^2)\\
&+3E(|\int_{t_n}^{t_n+\zeta h}(g(t,x(t),x(qt))-g(t_n,x(t_n),x(qt_n))){\rm d}B(t)|^2)
\end{split}
\end{equation*}
\begin{equation}\label{4.14}
\begin{split}
\leq&3K((1-\theta)^2\zeta h+1)E(\int_{t_n}^{t_n+\zeta h}(|x(t)-x(t_n)|^2+|x(qt)-x(qt_n)|^2){\rm d}t)
\\
&+3K\theta^2\zeta hE(\int_{t_n}^{t_n+\zeta h}(|x(t)-x(t_{n+1})|^2+|x(qt)-x(qt_{n+1})|^2){\rm d}t)
\\
\leq&C_2h^2,
\end{split}
\end{equation}
where $C_2=24K^2M(\theta^2-\theta+1)(q^2+q+2)$. Let $C_3=\sqrt{C_2}$, then
$$\max\limits_{0\leq t_n\leq N-1}\sup\limits_{\zeta\in (0,1]}(E(|\delta_h(t_n,\zeta)|^2))^{\frac{1}{2}}\leq C_3h.$$
\qed
\begin{theorem}~Under Lipschitz condition, the semi-implicit Euler method for problem (\ref{3.1}) is convergent with order 0.5.
\end{theorem}
{\bf Proof.} For any $s_l=t_n+\zeta h\in S_{N'}$, set
\begin{equation}\label{4.15}
\begin{split}
\nu_{h}(t_n,\zeta)=&(1-\theta)\int_{t_n}^{t_n+\zeta h}(f(t_n,x(t_n),x(qt_n))-f(t_n,y(t_n),y(qt_n))){\rm d}t
\\
&+\theta\int_{t_{n}}^{t_n+\zeta h}(f(t_{n+1},x(t_{n+1}),x(qt_{n+1}))-f(t_{n+1},y(t_{n+1}),y(qt_{n+1}))){\rm d}t
\\
&+\int_{t_n}^{t_n+\zeta h}(g(t_n,x(t_n),x(qt_n))-g(t_n,y(t_n),y(qt_n))){\rm d}B(t).
\\
\end{split}
\end{equation}
Then
\begin{equation}\label{4.16}
\epsilon(s_l)=x(t_n+\zeta h)-y(s_l)=\epsilon(t_n)+\delta_h(t_n,\zeta)+ \nu_{h}(t_n,\zeta).
\end{equation}
Squaring both sides of the equation above, employing the conditional expectation with respect to the $\sigma$-algebra $\mathcal{F}_0$, and taking absolute values, we get
\begin{equation}\label{4.17}
\begin{split}
E(|\epsilon(s_l)|^2|\mathcal{F}_0)\leq&E(|\epsilon(t_n)|^2|\mathcal{F}_0)+E(|\delta_h(t_n,\zeta)|^2|\mathcal{F}_0)+E(|\nu_{h}(t_n,\zeta)|^2|\mathcal{F}_0)
\\
&+2E(|\epsilon(t_n)|\cdot|\delta_h(t_n,\zeta)||\mathcal{F}_0)+2E(|\epsilon(t_n)|\cdot|\nu_h(t_n,\zeta)||\mathcal{F}_0)
\\
&+2E(|\delta_h(t_n,\zeta)|\cdot|\nu_h(t_n,\zeta)||\mathcal{F}_0) \quad \quad\quad\quad \quad\quad\quad \quad\quad\quad \quad \quad a.s.
\\
=&A_1+A_2+A_3+A_4+A_5+A_6.
\end{split}
\end{equation}
Next we will estimate the six terms in (\ref{4.14}). For the term $A_2$, by (\ref{4.14}) we have
\begin{equation*}
A_2=E(|\delta_h(t_n,\zeta)|^2|\mathcal{F}_0)=E(E(|\delta_h(t_n,\zeta)|^2|\mathcal{F}_n)|\mathcal{F}_0)\leq C_2h^2.
\end{equation*}
For $A_3$ in (\ref{4.17}), we obtain
\begin{equation*}
\begin{split}
A_3\leq&3(1-\theta)^2K\zeta hE(\int_{t_n}^{t_n+\zeta h}(|x(t_n)-y(t_n)|^2+|x(qt_n)-y(qt_n)|^2){\rm d}t|\mathcal{F}_0)
\\
&+3\theta^2K\zeta hE(\int_{t_{n}}^{t_n+\zeta h}(|x(t_{n+1})-y(t_{n+1})|^2+|x(qt_{n+1})-y(qt_{n+1})|^2{\rm d}t|\mathcal{F}_0)
\\
&+3KE(\int_{t_n}^{t_n+\zeta h}(|x(t_n)-y(t_n)|^2+|x(qt_n)-y(qt_n)|^2){\rm d}t|\mathcal{F}_0)
\\
=&3K\zeta h((1-\theta)^2\zeta h+1)E(|\epsilon(t_n)|^2|\mathcal{F}_0)+3K\zeta h((1-\theta)^2\zeta h+1)E(|\epsilon(qt_n)|^2|\mathcal{F}_0)
\\
&+3\theta^2K\zeta^2h^2E(|\epsilon(t_{n+1})|^2|\mathcal{F}_0)+3\theta^2K\zeta^2h^2E(|\epsilon(qt_{n+1})|^2|\mathcal{F}_0).
\end{split}
\end{equation*}
We estimate $A_4$,
\begin{equation*}
\begin{split}
A_4\leq 2(E(|E(\delta_h(t_n,\zeta))|^2|\mathcal{F}_0))^\frac{1}{2}\cdot (E(|\epsilon(t_n)|^2|\mathcal{F}_0))^\frac{1}{2}
\leq C_1^{2}h^{2}+hE(|\epsilon(t_n)|^2|\mathcal{F}_0).
\end{split}
\end{equation*}
In the same way, we can see
\begin{equation*}
\begin{split}
A_5\leq &(2-\theta)K^{\frac{1}{2}}\zeta hE(|\epsilon(t_n)|^2|\mathcal{F}_0)+(1-\theta)K^{\frac{1}{2}}\zeta hE(|\epsilon(qt_n)|^2|\mathcal{F}_0)
\\
&+\theta K^{\frac{1}{2}}\zeta hE(|\epsilon(t_{n+1})|^2|\mathcal{F}_0)+\theta K^{\frac{1}{2}}\zeta hE(|\epsilon(qt_{n+1})|^2|\mathcal{F}_0),
\end{split}
\end{equation*}
and
\begin{equation*}
\begin{split}
A_6\leq&2(E(|\nu_h(t_n,\zeta)|^2|\mathcal{F}_0))^{\frac{1}{2}}\cdot(E(|\delta_h(t_n,\zeta)|^2|\mathcal{F}_0))^{\frac{1}{2}}
\\
\leq&C_2h^2+3K\zeta h((1-\theta)^2\zeta h+1)E(|\epsilon(t_n)|^2|\mathcal{F}_0)
\\
&+3\theta^2K\zeta^2 h^2E(|\epsilon(t_{n+1})|^2|\mathcal{F}_0)
\\
&+3K\zeta h((1-\theta)^2\zeta h+1)E(|\epsilon(qt_n)|^2|\mathcal{F}_0)
\\
&+3\theta^2K\zeta^2 h^2E(|\epsilon(qt_{n+1})|^2|\mathcal{F}_0).
\end{split}
\end{equation*}
Combining these results, we can compute
\begin{equation}\label{4.18}
\begin{split}
E(|\epsilon(t_n+\zeta h)|^2|\mathcal{F}_0)\leq& (1+6K\zeta h((1-\theta)^2\zeta h+1)+h+(2-\theta)K^{\frac{1}{2}}\zeta h)E(|\epsilon(t_n)|^2|\mathcal{F}_0)
\\
&+(6\theta^2K\zeta^2h^2+\theta K^{\frac{1}{2}}\zeta h)E(|\epsilon(t_{n+1})|^2|\mathcal{F}_0)
\\
&+(6K\zeta h((1-\theta)^2\zeta h+1)+(1-\theta)K^{\frac{1}{2}}\zeta h)E(|\epsilon(qt_n)|^2|\mathcal{F}_0)
\\
&+(6\theta^2K\zeta^2h^2+\theta K^{\frac{1}{2}}\zeta h)E(|\epsilon(qt_{n+1})|^2|\mathcal{F}_0)+(2C_2+C_1^2)h^2.
\end{split}
\end{equation}
Set $R_0=0$, $R_n=\max\limits_{0\leq i< n}\sup\limits_{\zeta\in (0,1]}E(|\epsilon(t_i+\zeta h)|^2|\mathcal{F}_0)$, then
$$E(|\epsilon(t_n)|^2|\mathcal{F}_0)\leq R_n, ~~ E(|\epsilon(qt_n)|^2|\mathcal{F}_0)\leq R_n.$$
In (\ref{4.18}), we need to calculate $E(|\epsilon(qt_{n+1})|^2|\mathcal{F}_0)$, which depends on either $t_n<qt_{n+1}<t_{n+1}$ or $qt_{n+1}<t_n$.
Case 1: If $t_n<qt_{n+1}<t_{n+1}$, then $E(|\epsilon(qt_{n+1})|^2|\mathcal{F}_0)\leq R_{n+1}$. According to (\ref{4.18}), we can see
\begin{equation}
\begin{split}
E(|\epsilon(t_n+\zeta h)|^2|\mathcal{F}_0)\leq&(1+12(1-\theta)^2Kh^2+12Kh+h+(3-2\theta)K^{\frac{1}{2}}h)R_n\\
&+(12\theta^2Kh^2+2\theta K^{\frac{1}{2}}h)R_{n+1}.
\end{split}
\end{equation}
So
\begin{equation*}
\begin{split}
R_{n+1}=&\max\limits_{0\leq i< n+1}\sup\limits_{\zeta\in (0,1]}E(|\epsilon(t_i+\zeta h)|^2|\mathcal{F}_0)
\\
\leq&(1+12(1-\theta)^2Kh^2+12Kh+h+(3-2\theta)K^{\frac{1}{2}}h)R_n
\\
&+(12\theta^2Kh^2+2\theta K^{\frac{1}{2}}h)R_{n+1}+(2C_2+C_1^2)h^2.
\end{split}
\end{equation*}
There is $h_0=\frac{\sqrt{13}-1}{12}K^{-\frac{1}{2}}$, such that $1-12\theta^2Kh^2-2\theta K^{\frac{1}{2}}h>0$ when $0<h<h_0$. Therefore
\begin{equation*}
R_{n+1}\leq(1+h\frac{1+12(1-\theta)^2K+12K+3K^{\frac{1}{2}}+12\theta^2K}{1-12\theta^2Kh^2-2\theta K^{\frac{1}{2}}h})R_n+\frac{2C_2+C_1^2}{1-12\theta^2Kh^2-2\theta K^{\frac{1}{2}}h}h^2.
\end{equation*}
Case 2: If $qt_{n+1}<t_n$, then $E(|\epsilon(qt_{n+1})|^2|\mathcal{F}_0)\leq R_n$. In the same way as case 1, we can get
\begin{equation*}
R_{n+1}\leq(1+h\frac{1+12(1-\theta)^2K+12K+3K^{\frac{1}{2}}+12\theta^2K}{1-6\theta^2Kh^2-\theta K^{\frac{1}{2}}h})R_n+\frac{2C_2+C_1^2}{1-6\theta^2Kh^2-\theta K^{\frac{1}{2}}h}h^2,
\end{equation*}
when $0<h<h_1=\frac{1}{3}K^{-\frac{1}{2}}.$ Now take $0<L<1$, which is independent of $h$, such that $12\theta^2Kh^2+2\theta K^{\frac{1}{2}}h<L$, and set
$$M(\theta)=\frac{1+12(1-\theta)^2K+12K+3K^{\frac{1}{2}}+12\theta^2K}{1-L} ,~~C(\theta)=\frac{2C_2+C_1^2}{1-L}.$$
Then combining case 1 and case 2, the $R_{n+1}$ satisfies
\begin{equation*}
\begin{split}
R_{n+1}\leq&(1+hM(\theta))R_n+C(\theta)h^2\leq(1+hM(\theta))R_{n-1}+(1+hM(\theta))C(\theta)h^2+C(\theta)h^2
\\
\leq&\cdots\leq(1+hM(\theta))^{n+1}R_0+C(\theta)h^2\sum_{i=0}^{n}(1+hM(\theta))^{i}\leq \frac{(1+hM(\theta))^{n+1}-1}{M(\theta)}C(\theta)h.
\end{split}
\end{equation*}
The expression above indicates that
\begin{equation*}
E(|\epsilon(s_l)|^2|\mathcal{F}_0)\leq R_{n+1}\leq \frac{e^{TM(\theta)}-1}{M(\theta)}C(\theta)h,
\end{equation*}
for any $s_l=t_n+\zeta h\in S_{N'}$ holds, where $t_n\in T_N$, $\zeta\in (0,1]$.
By the definition of convergence, we can show
\begin{equation*}
\max\limits_{s_l\in S_{N'}}(E(|\epsilon(s_l)|^2|\mathcal{F}_0))^{\frac{1}{2}}\leq \sqrt{\frac{C(\theta)(e^{TM(\theta)}-1)}{M(\theta)}}h^{\frac{1}{2}}
\end{equation*}
The theorem is proved.
\qed\\
|
\section{Introduction}
\quad Nematic liquid crystals contain a large number of elongated, rod-like molecules and possess the same orientational order.
The continuum theory of liquid crystals due to Ericksen and Leslie was developed around $1960$'s \cite{Ericksen, Leslie}
(see also \cite{Gennes}). Since then, numerous researchers have obtained some important developments for liquid crystals
not only in theory but also in the application. When the fluid containing nematic liquid crystal materials is at rest,
we have the well-known Ossen-Frank theory for static nematic liquid crystals, see the
pioneering work by Hardt-Lin-Kinderlehrer \cite{Hard-Kinderlehrer-Lin} on the analysis of energy minimal configurations of
nematic liquid crystals. Generally speaking, the motion of fluid always takes place. The so-called Ericksen-Leslie system is a
macroscopic descriptions of the time evolution of the materials under the influence of both the flow velocity field and the
macroscopic description of the microscopic orientation configuration of rod-like liquid crystals.
In this paper, we investigate the motion of incompressible nematic liquid crystal flows, which are described by the following simplified version of the Ericksen-Leslie equations:
\begin{equation}\label{1.1}
\left\{
\begin{aligned}
& \rho_t+{\rm div}(\rho u)=0,\\
& (\rho u)_t+{\rm div}(\rho u\otimes u)-{\rm div}(2 \mu(\rho)D(u))+\nabla P=-\lambda {\rm div}(\nabla d \odot \nabla d),\\
& {\rm div}u=0,\\
& d_t+u\cdot \nabla d=\theta (\Delta d+|\nabla d|^2 d),
\end{aligned}
\right.
\end{equation}
in $\Omega \times (0,+\infty),$ where $\Omega$ is a bounded domain with smooth boundary in $\mathbb{R}^n(n=2$ or $ 3 ).$ Here $\rho, u, P$ and $d$ denote the unknown density, velocity, pressure and macroscopic average of the nematic liquid crystal orientation respectively. $D(u)=\frac{\nabla u+\nabla^T u}{2}$ is the deformation tensor, where $\nabla u$ presents the gradient matric of $u$ and $\nabla^T u$ its transpose. $\mu>0, \lambda>0, \theta>0$ are viscosity of fluid, competition between kinetic and potential energy, and microscopic elastic relaxation time respectively. The viscosity coefficient $\mu=\mu(\rho)$ is a general function of density and be assumed to satisfy:
\begin{equation}\label{1.2}
\mu \in C^1[0,\infty) \quad \text{and} \quad \mu>0 \quad \text{on} \quad [0,\infty).
\end{equation}
Without loss of generality, both $\lambda $ and $\theta$ are normalized to $1$.
The symbol $\nabla d \odot \nabla d$ denotes the $n\times n$ matrix whose $(i,j)-$th entry is given by $ \nabla d_i \cdot\nabla d_j,$ for $i,j=1,2,...,n.$ To complete the equation \eqref{1.1}-\eqref{1.2}, we consider an initial boundary value problem
for \eqref{1.1}-\eqref{1.2} with the following initial and boundary conditions
\begin{equation}\label{1.3}
(\rho, u, d)|_{t=0}=(\rho_0, u_0, d_0) \quad \text{with } \quad |d_0|=1, \quad {\rm div}u_0=0 \quad {\rm in} \ \Omega;
\end{equation}
\begin{equation}\label{1.4}
u=0, \quad \frac{\partial d}{\partial \nu}=0 \quad {\rm on} \ \partial \Omega;
\end{equation}
where $\nu$ is the unit outward normal vector to $\partial \Omega$.
When the fluid is the homogeneous case, the systems \eqref{1.1}-\eqref{1.4} are the simplified model of nematic liquid crystals with constant density. When the term $|\nabla d|^2 d$ be replaced by the Ginzburg-Laudan type approximation term $\frac{1-|d|^2}{\varepsilon^2}d$, Lin \cite{Lin} first derived a simplified Ericksen-Leslie
equations modeling the liquid crystal flows in $1989$. Later, Lin and Liu \cite{{Lin-Liu1},{Lin-Liu2}} made some important
analytic studies, such as the existence of weak/strong solutions and the partial regularity of suitable solutions. Recently,
Dai, Qing and Schonbek \cite{Dai-Qing-Schonbek} studied the large time behavior of solutions and gave the decay rate in the whole space in $\mathbb{R}^3$ with small initial data. Grasselli and Wu \cite{Garsselli-Wu} also considered the long-time behavior
and obtained the estimates on the convergence rate for nematic liquid crystal flows with external force. They also showed the
existence of global strong solutions provided that either the viscosity is large enough or the initial datum is closed to a
given equilibrium. As for the case of $|\nabla d|^2 d$, Huang and Wang \cite{Huang-Wang} established a blow up criterion
for the short time classical solutions in dimensions two and three. Recently, Li \cite{Li3} proved the local well-posedness
of mild solutions with $L^\infty$ initial data, in particular, the initial energy may be infinite.
When the fluid is non-homogeneous case, we would like to point out that the system \eqref{1.1}-\eqref{1.4} include two important equations, which have attracted large number of analysts' interests:\\
(i) When $d$ is a constant and $\mu$ is a function depending only on the density $\rho$, then system \eqref{1.1}-\eqref{1.4}
are the well-known Navier-Stokes equations with density-dependent viscosity coefficient. First, Lions \cite{Lions1} established
the global existence for the weak solutions for the case of positive initial density. As for the uniqueness, Lions telled
us the fact that sufficiently smooth solutions are unique and any weak solution must be equal to a strong one if the latter
exists. Later, Cho and Kim \cite{Cho-Kim1} proved the local existence of unique strong solutions for all initial data satisfying a
natural compatibility condition for the case of initial density being not be strictly positive. He also built the following
blowup criterion:
\begin{equation}\label{1.5}
\underset{0 \le t \le T^*}{\sup}\left(\|\nabla \rho(t)\|_{L^q}+\|\nabla u(t)\|_{L^2}\right)=\infty,
\end{equation}
if $T^*$ is the maximal existence time of the local strong solutions and $T^*<\infty.$\\
(ii)When $\mu$ is a constant, the systems \eqref{1.1}-\eqref{1.4} are a density-dependent incompressible hydrodynamic flow
of liquid crystals. When the term $|\nabla d|^2 d$ be replaced by the Ginzburg-Laudan type approximation term
$\frac{1-|d|^2}{\varepsilon^2}d$, the global existence of weak solution is obtained in \cite{Jiang-Tan, Xu-Tan, Liu-Zhang}
for each $\varepsilon>0$. Recently, Hu and Wu \cite{Hu-Wu} proved the decay of the velocity field for arbitrary large
regular initial data with the initial density being away from vacuum in two dimensional domain with smooth boundary.
As for the case of $|\nabla d|^2 d$, Wen and Ding \cite{Wen-Ding} obtained the local existence and uniqueness of strong solutions to the Dirichlet problem in bounded domain with initial density being allowed to have vacuum. Since the strong solutions of a harmonic map can blow up in finite time \cite{Chang-Ding-Ye}, one cannot expect to get a global strong solution with general initial data. Therefore, many researchers attempt to obtain global strong solutions under some additional assumptions.
Wen and Ding \cite{Wen-Ding} also established the global
existence and uniqueness of solutions for two dimensional case if the initial density is away from vacuum and the initial
data is of small norm. Global existence of strong solutions with small initial data to three dimensional liquid crystal
equations are obtained by Li and Wang in \cite{Li-Wang1} for constant density case, Li and Wang in \cite{Li-Wang2} for
nonconstant but positive density case, and Ding, Huang and Xia in \cite{Ding-Huang-Xia}. Recently, Li proved the global
existence and uniqueness of strong solutions with initial data being of small norm for the dimension two and three in
bounded domain in \cite{Li1} and the initial direction field satisfying some geometric structure for the two dimensional whole space in \cite{Li2}.
In this paper, we investigate the density-dependent incompressible nematic liquid crystal flows when the viscosity coefficient is a function of the density of the fluid. More precisely, we establish local unique strong solutions to \eqref{1.1}-\eqref{1.4}.
Then, we consider the possible breakdown of regularity for the strong solutions. Firstly, We build up a blowup criterion for the three dimensional bounded domain with smooth boundary. Secondly, applying a logarithmic inequality, we improve the preceding blowup criterion by omitting the velocity in a two dimensional bounded domain. Lastly, if the initial direction satisfies some geometric configuration, we establish a blowup criterion just in terms of the gradient of the density in two dimensional space.
Before stating our main result, we first explain the notations and conventions used throughout this paper.
We denote
\begin{equation*}
\int fdx=\int_{\Omega}fdx.
\end{equation*}
Let
\begin{equation*}
\dot{f}:=f_t+u \cdot \nabla f
\end{equation*}
represents the material derivative of $f$. For $1\le q \le \infty$ and integer $k\ge 0,$ the standard Sobolev spaces are denoted by:
\begin{equation*}
\left\{
\begin{aligned}
& L^q=L^q(\Omega),\quad W^{k,q}=W^{k,q}(\Omega),\quad H^k=W^{k,2},\\
& W_{0}^{1,q}=\{u\in W^{1,q}|u=0 \ {\rm on}\ \partial \Omega\},\quad H_0^1=W_0^{1,2}.
\end{aligned}
\right.
\end{equation*}
For two $n\times n$ matrices $M=(M_{ij}), N=(N_{ij})$, we denote the scalar product
between $M$ and $N$ by
\begin{equation*}
M:N=\sum_{i,j=1}^{n}M_{ij}N_{ij}.
\end{equation*}
Finally, we recall the definition on the weak $L^p-$space which is defined as follows:
\begin{equation*}
L_w^p \triangleq \left\{ f\in L^1_{loc}: \|f\|_{L^p_w}=
\underset{t>0}{\sup} \ t \left| \{x \in \Omega: |f(x)>t|\}\right|^{\frac{1}{p}}<\infty \right\}.
\end{equation*}
Now, we state our first result as follows.
\begin{theo}\label{Theorem1.1}
Let $\Omega$ be a bounded smooth domain in $\mathbb{R}^n(n=2,3)$ and $q\in(n,\infty)$ be a fixed constant. Suppose that the
initial data $(\rho_0, u_0, d_0)$ satisfies the regularity conditions
\begin{equation*}
0\le \rho_0 \in W^{1,q}, \ u_0 \in H_0^1\cap H^2, \ d_0 \in H^3 \ {\rm and}\ |d_0|=1,
\end{equation*}
and the compatibility condition
\begin{equation}\label{1.6}
-{\rm div}(2\mu(\rho_0)D(u_0))+\nabla P_0+{\rm div}(\nabla d_0\odot \nabla d_0)=\sqrt{\rho_0}g \ {\rm and } \ {\rm div}u_0=0
\ {\rm in} \ \Omega
\end{equation}
for $(P_0, g)\in H^1 \times L^2$. Then there exist a positive time $T_0>0$ and a unique strong solution $(\rho, u, d, P)$ of
\eqref{1.1}-\eqref{1.4} such that
\begin{equation*}
\begin{aligned}
& 0\le \rho \in C([0,T_0];W^{1,q}), \quad \rho_t \in C([0,T_0]; L^q),\\
& u\in C([0,T_0]; H_0^1 \cap H^2)\cap L^2(0,T_0; W^{2,r}), \\
& u_t \in L^2(0,T_0;H_0^1), \ \sqrt{\rho}u_t \in L^\infty(0,T_0; L^2),\\
& P \in C([0,T_0]; H^1)\cap L^2(0,T_0; W^{1,r}),\\
& d\in C([0,T_0]; H^3)\cap L^2(0,T_0; H^4),\ |d|=1 \ {\rm in} \ \overline{Q_{T_0}},\\
& d_t \in C([0,T_0]; H^1)\cap L^2(0,T_0; H^2), \ d_{tt} \in L^2(0,T_0; L^2),
\end{aligned}
\end{equation*}
for some $r$ with $n < r < min\{q, \frac{2n}{n-2}\}$ and $Q_{T_0}=\Omega \times [0, T_0].$
\end{theo}
After having the Theorem \ref{Theorem1.1} at hand, we will build the following blowup criterion of possible breakdown of local strong solution for the initial boundary problem \eqref{1.1}-\eqref{1.4} in three dimensional space.
\begin{theo}\label{blowupcriterion1}
Suppose the dimension $n=3$ and all the assumptions in Theorem \ref{Theorem1.1} are satisfied. Let $(\rho, u, d, P)$ be a strong solution of the initial boundary problem \eqref{1.1}-\eqref{1.4}
and $T^*$ be the maximal time of existence.
If $0<T^*<\infty$, then
\begin{equation}\label{1.7}
\underset{T \rightarrow T^*}{\lim}\left(\|\nabla \rho\|_{L^\infty(0,T;L^q)}
+\|u\|_{L^{s_1}(0,T;L_w^{r_1})}+\|\nabla d\|_{L^{s_2}(0,T;L_w^{r_2})}\right)=\infty,
\end{equation}
where $r_i$ and $s_i$ satisfy
\begin{equation}\label{1.8}
\frac{2}{s_i}+\frac{3}{r_i} \le 1, \ 3<r_i \le \infty, \ i=1,2.
\end{equation}
\end{theo}
As a corollary of Theorem \ref{blowupcriterion1}, we will establish a blowup criterion for the density-dependent incompressible
flow when the viscosity depends on the density in three dimensional domain. More precisely, if $d$ is a constant vector,
then we have the following corollary.
\begin{coro}\label{blowupcriterion2}
Suppose $d$ be a unit constant vector and all the assumptions in Theorem \ref{blowupcriterion1} are satisfied. Let $(\rho, u, d, P)$ be a strong solution of the initial boundary problem \eqref{1.1}-\eqref{1.4}
and $T^*$ be the maximal time of existence.
If $0<T^*<\infty$, then
\begin{equation}\label{1.9}
\underset{T \rightarrow T^*}{\lim}\left(\|\nabla \rho\|_{L^\infty(0,T;L^q)}
+\|u\|_{L^{s}(0,T;L_w^{r})}\right)=\infty,
\end{equation}
where $r$ and $s$ satisfy
\begin{equation}\label{1.10}
\frac{2}{s}+\frac{3}{r} \le 1, \ 3<r \le \infty.
\end{equation}
\end{coro}
\begin{rema}
The criterion for $u$ in \eqref{1.9} is given by a Serrin type and is more general than the blowup criterion \eqref{1.5}.
\end{rema}
Our next work is to improve the proceeding blowup criterion \eqref{1.7} by utilizing a logarithmic inequality for the two dimensional space, i.e.,
\begin{theo}\label{blowupcriterion3}
Suppose the dimension $n=2$ and all the assumptions in Theorem \ref{Theorem1.1} are satisfied. Let $(\rho, u, d, P)$ be a strong solution of the initial boundary problem \eqref{1.1}-\eqref{1.4}
and $T^*$ be the maximal time of existence.
If $0<T^*<\infty$, then
\begin{equation}\label{1.11}
\underset{T \rightarrow T^*}{\lim}\left(\|\nabla \rho\|_{L^\infty(0,T;L^q)}+\|\nabla d\|_{L^{s}(0,T;L_w^{r})}\right)=\infty,
\end{equation}
where $r$ and $s$ satisfy
\begin{equation}\label{1.12}
\frac{2}{s}+\frac{2}{r} \le 1, \ 2<r \le \infty.
\end{equation}
\end{theo}
As a corollary of Theorem \ref{blowupcriterion3}, we provide a blowup criterion for the density-dependent incompressible
flow when the viscosity depends on the density in two dimensional domain.
then we have the following corollary.
\begin{coro}\label{blowupcriterion4}
Suppose $d$ be a unit constant vector and all the assumptions in Theorem \ref{blowupcriterion3} are satisfied.
Let $(\rho, u, d, P)$ be a strong solution of the initial boundary problem \eqref{1.1}-\eqref{1.4}
and $T^*$ be the maximal time of existence.
If $0<T^*<\infty$, then
\begin{equation}\label{1.13}
\underset{T \rightarrow T^*}{\lim}\|\nabla \rho\|_{L^\infty(0,T;L^q)}=\infty.
\end{equation}
\end{coro}
Our next work concentrate on building blowup criterion the same as \eqref{1.13} if the initial direction field satisfies some special geometric configuration. More precisely, we have
\begin{coro}\label{blowupcriterion5}
For any $i(i=1,2),$ suppose the $i-$th component of initial direction field $d_{0i}$ satisfies the condition
\begin{equation*}
0 \le \underline{d}_{0i} \le d_{0i} \le 1 \quad {\rm or} \quad -1\le d_{0i} \le -\underline{d}_{0i}\le 0,
\end{equation*}
where $\underline{d}_{0i}$ is defined in \eqref{6.5},
and all the assumptions in Theorem \ref{blowupcriterion3} are satisfied.
Let $(\rho, u, d, P)$ be a strong solution of the initial boundary problem \eqref{1.1}-\eqref{1.4}
and $T^*$ be the maximal time of existence.
If $0<T^*<\infty$, then
\begin{equation}\label{1.14}
\underset{T \rightarrow T^*}{\lim}\|\nabla \rho\|_{L^\infty(0,T;L^q)}=\infty.
\end{equation}
\end{coro}
The rest of the paper is organized as follows: In Section $2$, we present some useful lemmas which will play an important
role in this paper; In Section $3$, we prove the Theorem \ref{Theorem1.1} by applying the method in \cite{Cho-Kim1};
From Section $4$ to Section $6$, we discuss and verify blowup criterions of strong solution respectively.
\section{Preliminaries}
\quad In this section, we give some useful lemmas which will be used frequently in this paper. The first lemma is the regularity estimates for the stationary Stokes equations, i.e.,
\begin{lemm}\label{Lemma2.1}
(See \cite{Cho-Kim1})Assume $\mu \in C^2[0,\infty)$ and $\rho \in W^{2,q}, 0 \le \rho \le C.$ Let $(u,P)\in H_0^1\times L^2 $ be the unique weak solution to the boundary value problem
\begin{equation*}
-{\rm div}(2\mu(\rho)D(u))+\nabla P=F, \quad {\rm div}u=0 \quad {\rm in}\ \Omega; \ \int Pdx=0,
\end{equation*}
where $D(u)=\frac{\nabla u+\nabla^T u}{2}$. Then we have the following regularity results:\\
$(1)$ If $F\in L^2,$ then $(u,P)\in H^2 \times H^1$ and
\begin{equation}\label{2.1}
\|u\|_{H^2}+\|P\|_{H^1} \le C\|F\|_{L^2}(1+\|\nabla \rho\|_{L^q})^{\frac{q}{q-n}}.
\end{equation}
$(2)$ If $F\in L^r$ for some $r \in (n,q)$ then $(u,P)\in W^{2, r} \times W^{1, r}$ and
\begin{equation}\label{2.2}
\|u\|_{W^{2,r}}+\|P\|_{W^{1,r}} \le C\|F\|_{L^r}(1+\|\nabla \rho\|_{L^q})^{\frac{qr}{2(q-r)}}.
\end{equation}
$(3)$ If $F\in H^1,$ then $(u,P)\in H^3 \times H^2$ and
\begin{equation}\label{2.1}
\|u\|_{H^3}+\|P\|_{H^2} \le \widetilde{C}\|F\|_{H^1}(1+\|\rho\|_{W^{2,q}})^N
\end{equation}
for some $N=N(n,q)>0$. The constant $ \widetilde{C}$ depends also on $\|\partial^2 \mu / \partial \mu^2\|_C$.
\end{lemm}
Next, we introduce a H\"{o}lder inequality in Lorentz space. The Lorentz space and its norm are denoted, respectively, by $L^{p,q}$ and $\|\cdot\|_{L^{p,q}}$, where $1<p<\infty$ and $1 \le q \le \infty.$ Now, we can state the following H\"{o}lder inequality in Lorentz space $L^{p,q}$.
\begin{lemm}\label{Lemma2.2}
(See \cite{Kim} )Let $1<p_1, p_2<\infty$ with $\frac{1}{p}=\frac{1}{p_1}+\frac{1}{p_2}$ and let $1 \le q_1, q_2 \le \infty.$
Then for $f\in L^{p_1, q_1}$ and $g \in L^{p_2,q_2}$, it holds that
\begin{equation*}
\|f \cdot g\|_{L^{p,q}} \le C \| f \|_{L^{p_1, q_1}} \| g \|_{L^{p_1, q_1}} \quad {\rm with} \ q=\min\{q_1, q_2 \},
\end{equation*}
where $C$ is a positive constant depending only on $p_1, p_2, q_1$ and $q_2$.
\end{lemm}
The following lemma has been proved in \cite{Kim}, for the readers' convenience, we give the proof in detail.
\begin{lemm}\label{lemma2.3}
Assume $g\in H^1$ and $f\in L_w^r$ with $r\in (n, \infty],$ then $f\cdot g \in L^2.$ Furthermore, for any $\varepsilon>0$ and
$r \in (n, \infty]$, we have
\begin{equation}\label{2.4}
\|f\cdot g\|_{L^2}^2 \le \varepsilon \|g\|_{H^1}^2+C(\varepsilon)\|f\|_{L_w^r}^{\frac{2r}{r-n}}\|g\|_{L^2}^2,
\end{equation}
where $C(\varepsilon)$ is a positive constant depending only on $\varepsilon, \ n, \ r$ and the domain $\Omega$.
\end{lemm}
\begin{proof}
Applying the Lemma \ref{Lemma2.2}, it is easy to get
\begin{equation}\label{2.5}
\|f \cdot g\|_{L^2}=\|f \cdot g\|_{L^{2,2}}\le C\|f\|_{L^r_w}\|g\|_{L^{\frac{2r}{r-2},2}}, \quad {\rm where}\ r\in (n, \infty].
\end{equation}
Next, we will show that
\begin{equation}\label{2.6}
\|g\|_{L^{\frac{2r}{r-2},2}} \le C \|g\|_{L^2}^{\frac{r-n}{r}} \|g\|_{H^1}^{\frac{n}{r}}, \quad {\rm where} \ r\in (n, \infty].
\end{equation}
Indeed, if $r=\infty$, then \eqref{2.6} holds on obviously. If $r\in (n,\infty)$, then $L^{\frac{2r}{r-2},2}$ is a real interpolation space of $ L^{\frac{2 r_1}{r_1-2}}$ and
$L^{\frac{2 r_2}{r_2-2}}$, where $r_1, r_2$ and $r$ satisfy $n<r_1<r<r_2<\infty$ and $\frac{2}{r}=\frac{1}{r_1}+\frac{1}{r_2}$, then
\begin{equation*}
\begin{aligned}
\|g\|_{L^{{\frac{2r}{r-2}},2}}
& \le C\|g\|_{L^{\frac{2 r_1}{r_1-2}}}^{\frac{1}{2}}\|g\|_{L^{\frac{2 r_2}{r_2-2}}}^{\frac{1}{2}}\\
& \le C\left(\|g\|_{L^2}^{\frac{r_1-n}{r_1}}\|g\|_{H^1}^{\frac{n}{r_1}}\right)^{\frac{1}{2}}
\left(\|g\|_{L^2}^{\frac{r_2-n}{r_2}}\|g\|_{H^1}^{\frac{n}{r_2}}\right)^{\frac{1}{2}} \\
& \le C\|g\|_{L^2}^{\frac{r-n}{r}}\|g\|_{H^1}^{\frac{n}{r}},
\end{aligned}
\end{equation*}
where we have used the Sobolev inequality. Therefore, combining \eqref{2.5} with \eqref{2.6} gives \eqref{2.4} directly if we exploit the Cauchy inequality.
\end{proof}
The last lemma introduced in this section will be the following logarithmic Sobolev inequality which plays an important role
in the proof of the Lemma \ref{lemma5.2}. Omitting the proof for brief, one can read \cite{Huang-Wang2}.
\begin{lemm}\label{lemma2.4}
Let $\Omega$ be a bounded smooth domain in $\mathbb{R}^2$, and $f\in L^2(s,t;H^1\cap W^{1,q})$ for $q\in (2,\infty).$ Then
there exists a constant $C$ depending only on $q$ such that
\begin{equation}\label{2.7}
\|f\|^2_{L^2(s,t;L^\infty)}\le C\left[1+\|f\|^2_{L^2(s,t;H^1)}\ln (e+\|f\|_{L^2(s,t;W^{1,q})})\right],
\end{equation}
where $C$ depends only on $q$ and $\Omega$, but independent of $s, t$.
\end{lemm}
\section{Proof of Theorem \ref{Theorem1.1}}
\quad In this section, we will only give the existence proof for the Theorem \ref{Theorem1.1} since the uniqueness of the solution is easy to obtain by a standard argument(c.f.\cite{Lions1}). In order to solve the initial boundary problem \eqref{1.1}-\eqref{1.4}, we will split the proof into three parts. In part one, we will establish the global strong solution for some linearized systems. In part two, we prove the solution of the linearized systems converges to the original initial problem \eqref{1.1}-\eqref{1.4} in a local time for positive initial density. In part three, we verify Theorem \ref{Theorem1.1} for the case of general initial density.
\subsection{Global existence for the linearized equations}
\quad We consider the following linearized systems:
\begin{equation}\label{3.1}
\left\{
\begin{aligned}
&\rho_t+v \cdot \nabla \rho=0,\\
&\rho u_t +\rho v \cdot \nabla u-{\rm div}(2\mu(\rho)D(u))+\nabla P=-{\rm div}f,\\
&{\rm div}u=0,
\end{aligned}
\right.
\end{equation}
in $(0,\infty)\times \Omega$, where\ $2D(u)=\nabla u+\nabla^T u, \mu=\mu(\rho)$ satisfies \eqref{1.2} and $v$ is a known divergence-free vector field.
Then we will state the main result in this subsection.
\begin{prop}\label{Proposition3.1}
Assume that the data $(\rho_0, u_0, f)$ satisfies the regularity conditions:
\begin{equation*}
0 \le \rho_0 \in W^{1,q}, \ u_0 \in H_0^1 \cap H^2 \ {\rm and} \ f\in L^\infty(0,T; H^1)\cap L^2(0,T; H^2), f_t \in L^2(0,T; H^1)
\end{equation*}
for some $q$ with $n<q<\infty$, and the compatibility condition
\begin{equation}\label{3.2}
-{\rm div}(2\mu(\rho_0)D(u_0))+\nabla P_0+{\rm div}f_0=\sqrt{\rho_0}g \quad {\rm and} \ {\rm div}u_0=0 \ {\rm in} \ \Omega,
\end{equation}
for some $(P_0, g)\in H^1 \times L^2$. If in addition, $v$ satisfies the regularity conditions
\begin{equation*}
v\in L^\infty(0,T; H_0^1 \cap H^2)\cap L^2(0,T; W^{2,r}),
\ v_t \in L^2(0,T; H_0^1) \ {\rm and} \ {\rm div}v=0 \ {\rm in} \ \Omega,
\end{equation*}
for some $r$ with $n<r<\min \{q, \frac{2n}{n-2}\}$. Then there exists a unique strong solution $(\rho, u, P)$ to the initial boundary value problem \eqref{3.1}, \eqref{1.2}-\eqref{1.4} such that
\begin{equation}\label{3.3}
\begin{aligned}
& \rho \in C([0,T]; W^{1,q}), \ \nabla u, \ P \in C([0,T]; H^1)\cap L^2(0,T; W^{1,r}),\\
& \rho_t \in C([0,T]; L^q),\ \sqrt{\rho}u_t \in L^\infty(0,T; L^2), \ u_t \in L^2 (0,T; H_0^1).
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
\end{prop}
In order to prove Proposition \ref{Proposition3.1}, we will take by three steps:\\
$(1)$ In addition to the assumptions in Proposition \ref{Proposition3.1}, if suppose
\begin{equation}\label{3.4}
\mu \in C^2 [0, \infty), \quad \rho_0 \in W^{2,q}, \quad \rho_0 \ge \delta \ {\rm for\ some} \ \delta >0,
\end{equation}
then we give the prove of Proposition \ref{Proposition3.1};\\
$(2)$ To remove the additional condition \eqref{3.4}, we need to derive some uniform estimates independent of
$\delta, \|\rho_0\|_{W^{2,q}}$ and $ \|\partial^2 \mu / \partial \mu^2\|_{C}$;\\
$(3)$ Having the results of the proceeding two steps at hand, it is a standard argument to give the proof of
Proposition \ref{Proposition3.1}.
Now, let us to begin our first step. Indeed, taking the method in \cite{Cho-Kim1}, it is easy to get the following results.
For a brief, we only state the results and omit the proof.
\begin{lemm}\label{lemma3.2}
In addition to the hypotheses of Proposition \ref{Proposition3.1}, we assume that the condition \eqref{3.4} are satisfied. Then there exists a unique strong solution $(\rho, u, P)$ to the initial boundary value problem \eqref{3.1}, \eqref{1.2}-\eqref{1.4} such that
\begin{equation*}
\begin{aligned}
& \rho \in C(0,T; W^{1, \infty}) \cap L^2(0,T; W^{2,r}),\ \rho_t \in L^\infty(0,T; W^{1,r}),\\
& u \in C([0,T]; H_0^1 \cap H^2)\cap L^2(0,T; H^3),\ u_t \in L^\infty(0,T; L^2)\cap L^2(0,T; H_0^1),\\
& P\in L^\infty(0, T; H^1)\cap L^2(0,T; H^2),
\end{aligned}
\end{equation*}
where $n<r<\min \{q, \frac{2n}{n-2}\}$.
\end{lemm}
Thanks to the previous Lemma \ref{lemma3.2}, there exists a unique strong solution $(\rho, u, P)$ satisfying the
regularity \eqref{3.3}. To remove the additional hypotheses \eqref{3.4}, we will derive some uniform estimates independent of
$\delta, \|\rho_0\|_{W^{2,q}}$ and $ \|\partial^2 \mu / \partial \mu^2\|_{C}$.
\begin{lemm}\label{lemma3.3}
Suppose $(\rho, u, P)$ be the strong solution to the problem \eqref{3.1}, \eqref{1.2}-\eqref{1.4}, then we have
\begin{equation}\label{3.5}
\begin{aligned}
&\underset{0 \le t \le T}{\sup}\left(\|\rho\|_{W^{1,q}}+\|\rho_t\|_{L^q}+\|u\|_{H^2}+\|P\|_{H^1}+\|\sqrt{\rho}u_t\|_{L^2}\right)\\
&+\int_0^T \left(\|u\|_{W^{2,r}}^2+\|P\|_{W^{1,r}}^2+\|\nabla u_t\|_{L^2}^2\right)dt \le C,
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
where $C$ independent of $\delta, \|\rho_0\|_{W^{2,q}}$ and $ \|\partial^2 \mu / \partial \mu^2\|_{C}$
and $n<r<\min \{q, \frac{2n}{n-2}\}$.
\end{lemm}
\begin{proof}
\textrm{Step 1:} We deduce from \eqref{3.1}$_1$ by applying the characteristic method that
\begin{equation}\label{3.6}
\|\rho(t)\|_{L^s}=\|\rho_0\|_{L^s} \quad {\rm for} \quad 0 \le t \le T, \ 1\le s \le \infty.
\end{equation}
Taking the gradient operator to \eqref{3.1}$_1$, multiplying by $q|\nabla \rho|^{q-2}\nabla \rho$ and integrating by parts, we obtain
\begin{equation*}
\|\nabla \rho(t)\|_{L^q}\le \|\nabla \rho_0\|_{L^q}\exp \left(C\int_0^t \|v(s)\|_{W^{2,r}}ds\right),
\end{equation*}
which implies
\begin{equation*}
\|\partial_t \rho(t)\|_{L^q}\le C\|v\|_{H^2}\|\nabla \rho_0\|_{L^q}\exp \left(C\int_0^t \|v(s)\|_{W^{2,r}}ds\right),
\end{equation*}
due to \eqref{3.1}$_1$.
It is easy to observe from \eqref{1.2} and \eqref{3.6} that
\begin{equation}\label{3.7}
C^{-1} \le \mu \le C \quad {\rm and} \quad |\nabla \mu|\le C|\nabla \rho|,
\end{equation}
which will be used repeatedly.
\textrm{Step 2:} Multiplying $\eqref{1.1}_2$ by $u_t$ and integrating over $(0,t)\times\Omega$, we have
\begin{equation}\label{3.8}
\begin{aligned}
&\quad \int \mu (\rho)|D(u)|^2(t) dx+\int_0^t \int \rho |u_t|^2 dxd\tau\\
&\le C+\int |f||\nabla u|dx
+\int_0^t \int \left(|f_t||\nabla u|+\rho |v| |\nabla u| |u_t|+|\mu'||v||\nabla \rho||D(u)|^2\right)dxd\tau\\
&=C+\sum_{i=1}^4 I_{1i}.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
To estimate the terms $I_{1i}(1\le i \le 4)$, we will make use of the Young and Sobolev inequalities.
\begin{equation*}
\begin{aligned}
I_{11} & \le C(\varepsilon)\int |f|^2dx+\varepsilon\int |\nabla u|^2dx,\\
I_{12} & \le 2 \int_0^t(\|f_t\|_{L^2}^2+\|\nabla u\|_{L^2}^2)d\tau,\\
I_{13} & \le C(\varepsilon)\int_0^t\int \rho |v|^2 |\nabla u|^2 dxd\tau+\varepsilon\int_0^t \int \rho |u_t|^2 dxd\tau\\
& \le C(\varepsilon)\|\rho\|_{L^\infty} \|v\|_{L^\infty}^2 \int_0^t \int |\nabla u|^2 dxd\tau
+\varepsilon\int_0^t \int \rho |u_t|^2 dxd\tau,\\
I_{14} & \le C\int_0^t \|v\|_{L^6} \|\nabla \rho\|_{L^q} \|\nabla u\|_{L^{\frac{12q}{5q-6}}}^2d\tau\\
& \le C\int_0^t \|\nabla v\|_{L^2} \|\nabla \rho\|_{L^q}
\|\nabla u\|_{L^2}^{\frac{12q-n(q+6)}{6q}}\|\nabla u\|_{H^1}^{\frac{n(q+6)}{6q}}d\tau\\
& \le C \|\nabla \rho\|_{L^q} \|\nabla v\|_{L^2} \int_0^t \|\nabla u\|_{L^2}^2d\tau
+\varepsilon \int_0^t \|\nabla u\|_{H^1}^2 d\tau.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation*}
On the other hand, we get
\begin{equation}\label{3.9}
\int \mu(\rho) |D(u)|^2 dx \ge C^{-1}\int |D(u)|^2 dx=\frac{1}{2C}\int |\nabla u|^2 dx,
\end{equation}
due to \eqref{3.7} and $\eqref{3.1}_3$.
Substituting $I_{1i}(1 \le i\le 4)$ and \eqref{3.9} into \eqref{3.8} yields
\begin{equation}\label{3.10}
\begin{aligned}
&\quad \frac{1}{4C}\int |\nabla u|^2dx+\frac{1}{2}\int_0^t\int \rho |u_t|^2 dxd\tau\\
& \le C\left(1+\|f\|_{L^2}^2+\int_0^t \|f_t\|_{L^2}^2 d\tau\right)+C\int_0^t \|\nabla u\|_{L^2}^2 d\tau
+\varepsilon \int_0^t \|\nabla u\|_{H^1}^2 d\tau.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
In order to deal with the term $\int_0^t \|\nabla u\|_{H^1}^2 d\tau$, we will applying the regularity estimate
for the stationary Stokes equations in Lemma \ref{Lemma2.1}. More precisely,
\begin{equation*}
\|u\|_{H^2}+\|P\|_{H^1}\le C \|F\|_{L^2}(1+\|\nabla \rho\|_{L^q})^{\frac{q}{q-n}}\le C\|F\|_{L^2},
\end{equation*}
where
\begin{equation*}
\begin{aligned}
\|F\|_{L^2}& =\|-\rho u_t -\rho v \cdot \nabla u-{\rm div}f\|_{L^2}\\
&\le C\|\sqrt{\rho}u_t\|_{L^2}+C\|\nabla u\|_{L^2}+\|{\rm div}f\|_{L^2}.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation*}
Then we have the following regularity estimate
\begin{equation}\label{3.11}
\|u\|_{H^2}+\|P\|_{H^1}\le C (\|{\rm div}f\|_{L^2}+\|\sqrt{\rho}u_t\|_{L^2}+\|\nabla u\|_{L^2}).
\end{equation}
Substituting \eqref{3.11} into \eqref{3.10} and choosing $\varepsilon$ small enough, we obtain
\begin{equation*}
\int |\nabla u|^2 dx+\int_0^t \int \rho |u_t|^2 \le C+C\int_0^t \|\nabla u\|_{L^2}^2d\tau,
\end{equation*}
which, if we exploit the Gronwall inequality, implies
\begin{equation}\label{3.12}
\underset{0 \le t \le T}{\sup}\|\nabla u\|_{L^2}^2 +\int_0^t \|\sqrt{\rho}u_t\|_{L^2}^2 d\tau\le C.
\end{equation}
\textrm{Step 3:}Differentiating $\eqref{1.1}_2$ with respect to $t$, multiplying by $u_t$ and integrating over $\Omega$, we have
\begin{equation}\label{3.13}
\begin{aligned}
& \quad \frac{1}{2} \frac{d}{dt}\int \rho |u_t|^2dx+\frac{1}{C}\int |\nabla u_t|^2 dx\\
& \le C\int \left(|v| |\nabla \rho| |\nabla u| |\nabla u_t|+\rho |v| |u_t| |\nabla u_t|
+ |v|^2 |\nabla \rho| |\nabla u| |u_t|\right.\\
&\left. \quad \quad \quad \quad +\rho |v_t| |\nabla u| |u_t|+|f_t||\nabla u_t|\right)dx
=\sum_{i=1}^5 I_{2i}.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
To estimate the terms $I_{2i}(1\le i \le 5)$, we will apply \eqref{3.11}, the Gagliardo-Nirenberg and H\"{o}lder inequalities repeatedly:
\begin{equation*}
\begin{aligned}
I_{21} &\le \|v\|_{L^\infty}\|\nabla \rho\|_{L^q}\|\nabla u\|_{L^{\frac{2q}{q-2}}}\|\nabla u_t\|_{L^2}\\
&\le C(\varepsilon)\|v\|_{L^\infty}^2 \|\nabla \rho\|_{L^q}^2 \|\nabla u\|_{H^1}^2+\varepsilon\|\nabla u_t\|_{L^2}^2\\
&\le C(\varepsilon)(1+\|{\rm div}f\|_{L^2}^2+\|\sqrt{\rho}u_t\|_{L^2}^2)+\varepsilon\|\nabla u_t\|_{L^2}^2,\\
I_{22} &\le C(\varepsilon)\|\rho\|_{L^\infty}\|v\|_{L^\infty}^2 \int \rho |u_t|^2dx+\varepsilon \int |\nabla u_t|^2dx\\
&\le C(\varepsilon)\|\sqrt{\rho}u_t\|_{L^2}^2+\varepsilon\|\nabla u_t\|_{L^2}^2,\\
I_{23} &\le \|v\|_{L^\infty}^2\|\nabla \rho\|_{L^q}\|\nabla u\|_{L^{\frac{6q}{5q-6}}}\|u_t\|_{L^6}\\
&\le C\|v\|_{L^\infty}^2\|\nabla \rho\|_{L^q}
\|\nabla u\|_{L^2}^{\frac{3q+nq-3n}{6q}}\|\nabla u\|_{H^1}^{\frac{3q+3n-nq}{6q}}\|\nabla u_t\|_{L^2}\\
&\le C(\varepsilon)(1+\|{\rm div}f\|_{L^2}^2+\|\sqrt{\rho}u_t\|_{L^2}^2)+\varepsilon\|\nabla u_t\|_{L^2}^2,\\
I_{24} &\le \|\rho\|_{L^\infty}\|v_t\|_{L^3}\|\nabla u\|_{L^2}\|u_t\|_{L^6}\\
&\le C\|\rho\|_{L^\infty}\|\nabla v_t\|_{L^2}\|\nabla u\|_{L^2}\|\nabla u_t\|_{L^2}\\
&\le C(\varepsilon)\|\nabla v_t\|_{L^2}^2++\varepsilon\|\nabla u_t\|_{L^2}^2,\\
I_{25} &\le C(\varepsilon)\|f_t\|_{L^2}^2+\varepsilon\|\nabla u_t\|_{L^2}^2.\\
\end{aligned}
\end{equation*}
For any fixed $\tau\in(0, t)$, substituting $I_{2i}(1\le i \le 5)$ into \eqref{3.13} and integrating over $(\tau, t)\subset[0, T]$ yield
\begin{equation*}
\begin{aligned}
&\quad \frac{1}{2}\int\rho |u_t|^2 dx+\frac{1}{2C}\int_\tau^t \int |\nabla u_t|^2 dxds \\
&\le \frac{1}{2}\int \rho(\tau)|u_t(\tau)|^2 dx
+C\int_\tau^t\left(\|{\rm div}f\|_{L^2}^2+\|f_t\|_{L^2}^2+\|\nabla v_t\|_{L^2}^2\right)ds+\int_\tau^t\int \rho |u_t|^2dxds.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation*}
Thanks to the compatibility condition \eqref{3.2}, letting $\tau \rightarrow 0^+$ and applying the Gr\"{o}nwall inequality, it arrives at
\begin{equation}\label{3.14}
\underset{0\le t \le T}{\sup}\|\sqrt{\rho}u_t(t)\|_{L^2}^2+\int_0^T \|\nabla u_t\|_{L^2}^2dt \le C.
\end{equation}
\textrm{Step 4:} High order estimates. Indeed, combing \eqref{3.14} with \eqref{3.11}-\eqref{3.12} yields
\begin{equation}\label{3.15}
\|u\|_{H^2}+\|P\|_{H^1}\le C.
\end{equation}
Applying the stationary Stokes regularity estimate, i.e. \eqref{2.2}, we get
\begin{equation*}
\|u\|_{W^{2,r}}+\|P\|_{W^{1,r}}\le C\|F\|_{L^r}(1+\|\nabla \rho\|_{L^q})^{\frac{qr}{2(q-r)}}\le C\|F\|_{L^r},
\end{equation*}
where
\begin{equation*}
\begin{aligned}
\|F\|_{L^r}&=\|-\rho u_t-\rho v \cdot \nabla u -{\rm div}f\|_{L^r}\\
&\le \|\rho\|_{L^\infty}\|u_t\|_{L^r}+\|\rho\|_{L^\infty}\|v\|_{L^\infty}\|\nabla u\|_{L^r}+\|{\rm div}f\|_{L^r}\\
&\le C\left(\|\rho\|_{L^\infty}\|\nabla u_t\|_{L^2}+\|\rho\|_{L^\infty}\|v\|_{L^\infty}\|\nabla u\|_{H^1}
+\|{\rm div}f\|_{H^1}\right)\\
&\le C(1+\|\nabla u_t\|_{L^2}+\|{\rm div}f\|_{H^1}).
\end{aligned}
\end{equation*}
Hence we obtain the following regularity estimate
\begin{equation}\label{3.16}
\|u\|_{W^{2,r}}+\|P\|_{W^{1,r}}\le C(1+\|\nabla u_t\|_{L^2}+\|{\rm div}f\|_{H^1}).
\end{equation}
Therefore, we complete the proof of lemma.
\end{proof}
After having the Lemmas \ref{lemma3.2}-\ref{lemma3.3} at hand, we turn to prove the Proposition \ref{Proposition3.1}.
We only sketch the proof here since it is a standard argument(c.f.\cite{Cho-Kim1}). Let $(\rho_0, u_0)$ be an initial data
satisfying the hypotheses of Proposition \ref{Proposition3.1}. For each $\delta \in(0,1)$, choose $\rho_0^\delta \in W^{2,q}$ and $\mu^\delta \in C^2[0, \infty)$ such that
\begin{equation*}
0<\delta \le \rho_0^\delta \le \rho_0+1, \quad \rho_0^\delta \rightarrow \rho_0 \ {\rm in} \ W^{1, q} \
{\rm and} \ \mu^\delta \rightarrow \mu \ {\rm in} \ C^1[0, \infty),
\end{equation*}
as $\delta \rightarrow 0$, and denote $(u_0^\delta, P_0^\delta)\in H_0^1 \times L^2$ a solution to the problem
\begin{equation*}
-{\rm div}(\mu^\delta(\rho_0^\delta)D(u_0^\delta))+\nabla P_0^\delta+{\rm div}f_0=\sqrt{\rho_0^\delta}g \quad {\rm and} \quad
{\rm div}u_0^\delta=0 \quad {\rm in} \ \Omega.
\end{equation*}
Then, applying the Lemma \ref{lemma3.3}, the corresponding solution $(\rho^\delta, u^\delta, P^\delta)$ satisfies the estimate
\begin{equation*}
\begin{aligned}
&\underset{0 \le t \le T}{\sup}\left(\|\rho^\delta\|_{W^{1,q}}+\|\rho^\delta_t\|_{L^q}+\|u^\delta\|_{H^2}+\|P^\delta\|_{H^1}
+\|\sqrt{\rho^\delta}u^\delta_t\|_{L^2}\right)\\
&\quad \quad \quad +\int_0^T \left(\|u^\delta\|_{W^{2,r}}^2+\|P^\delta\|_{W^{1,r}}^2+\|\nabla u^\delta_t\|_{L^2}^2\right)dt \le C,
\end{aligned}
\end{equation*}
where $C$ independent of $\delta, \|\rho_0\|_{W^{2,q}}$ and $ \|\partial^2 \mu / \partial \mu^2\|_{C}$
and $n<r<\min \{q, \frac{2n}{n-2}\}$.
We choose a subsequence of solutions $(\rho^\delta, u^\delta)$ which converge to a limit $(\rho, u)$ in a weak sense.
Therefore, it is a strong solution to the linearized problem satisfying the regularity estimates in Lemma \ref{lemma3.3}. Thus, we complete the proof of Proposition \ref{Proposition3.1}.
\subsection{Local existence for the original problem}
\quad In this section, we will prove a local existence result on strong solution with positive initial density to the original problem \eqref{1.1}-\eqref{1.4} at first. Furthermore, we derive some uniform bounds which are independent of the lower bounds of the initial density. Then, these uniform bounds will be used to prove the existence of strong solution with nonnegative initial
density in the last part of this section.
\begin{prop}\label{proposition3.4}
Assume that the data $(\rho_0,u_0,d_0)$ satisfies the regularity conditions
\begin{equation*}
\rho_0 \in W^{1,q}, \ u_0 \in H_0^1 \cap H^2, \ d_0 \in H^3,
\end{equation*}
for some $q$ with $n<q<\infty$ and the compatibility condition
\begin{equation}\label{3.17}
-{\rm div}(2 \mu(\rho_0)D(u_0))+\nabla P_0+{\rm div}(\nabla d_0 \odot \nabla d_0)=\sqrt{\rho_0}g
\quad {\rm and} \quad {\rm div}u_0=0 \quad {\rm in}\ \Omega,
\end{equation}
for $(P_0, g)\in H^1\times L^2.$ Assume further that $\rho_0 \ge \delta$ in $\Omega$ for some constant $\delta>0.$
Then there exist a time $T_0\in(0, T)$ and a unique strong solution $(\rho, u, P, d)$ to the nonlinear problem
\eqref{1.1}-\eqref{1.4} such that
\begin{equation}\label{3.18}
\begin{aligned}
&\rho \in C([0, T_0]; W^{1, q}), \quad \rho_t \in C([0, T_0]; L^q),\\
&u\in C([0, T_0]; H_0^1 \cap H^2)\cap L^2(0, T_0; W^{2,r}),\\
&u_t \in L^2(0,T_0; H_0^1),\ \sqrt{\rho}u_t\in L^\infty(0, T_0; L^2),\\
&P\in C([0, T_0]; H^1)\cap L^2(0, T_0; W^{1,r}),\\
&d \in C([0, T_0]; H^3)\cap L^2(0, T_0; H^4),\ |d|=1 \ {\rm in}\ \overline{Q_{T_0}},\\
&d_t \in C([0, T_0]; H^1)\cap L^2(0, T_0; H^2), \ d_{tt}\in L^2(0, T_0; L^2),
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
for some $r$ with $n<r<\min\{q, \frac{2n}{n-2}\}$.
\end{prop}
To prove the Proposition \ref{proposition3.4}, we first construct approximate solutions, as follows:\\
$(1)$ first define $u^0=0$ and $d^0=d_0$;\\
$(2)$ assuming that $u^{k-1}$ and $d^{k-1}$ was defined for $k\ge 1$, let $(\rho^k, u^k, d^k, P^k)$ be the unique
solution to the following initial boundary value problem
\begin{equation}\label{3.19}
\left\{
\begin{aligned}
&\rho_t^k+u^{k-1}\cdot \nabla \rho^k=0,\\
&\rho^k u^k_t+\rho^k (u^{k-1}\cdot \nabla)u^k- {\rm div}(2\mu(\rho^k)D(u^k))+\nabla P^k
=-{\rm div}(\nabla d^k \odot \nabla d^k ),\\
&{\rm div}u^k=0,\\
&d^k_t-\Delta d^k=|\nabla d^{k-1}|^2 d^{k-1}-(u^{k-1}\cdot \nabla)d^{k-1},
\end{aligned}
\right.
\end{equation}
with the initial and boundary conditions
\begin{equation}\label{3.20}
\left.(\rho^k, u^k, d^k)\right|_{t=0}=(\rho_0, u_0, d_0) \quad x\in \Omega,
\end{equation}
\begin{equation}\label{3.21}
(u^k, \frac{\partial d^k}{\partial \nu})=(0,0) \quad {\rm on}\ \partial \Omega,
\end{equation}
where $\nu$ is the unit outward normal vector to $\partial \Omega$.
\subsubsection{Uniform bounds}
\quad Thanks to the Proposition \ref{Proposition3.1} to $\eqref{3.19}_1-\eqref{3.19}_2$ and existence and uniqueness of the theory of parabolic equation to $\eqref{3.19}_4 $(c.f.\cite{Ladyzenskaja-Solonnikov-Ural'ceva}), it is easy to get the existence of a global strong solution $(\rho^k, u^k, P^k, d^k)$
with the regularity \eqref{3.18} to the linearized problem \eqref{3.19}-\eqref{3.21}.
From now on, we derive uniform bounds on the approximate solutions and then prove that the approximate solutions converge
to a strong solution of the original nonlinear problem. Let $K\ge 1$ be a fixed large integer, and define a function as
\begin{equation*}
\Phi_K(t)=\underset{1\le k\le K}{\max}\underset{0 \le s \le t}{\sup}
\left(1+\|\nabla u^k(s)\|_{L^2}+\|\nabla d^k(s)\|_{H^2}+\|\nabla \rho^k(s)\|_{L^q}\right).
\end{equation*}
Observe then that
\begin{equation}\label{3.22}
\delta \le \rho^k \le C, \quad C^{-1} \le \mu^k \le C, \quad |\nabla \mu^k| \le C|\nabla \rho^k|.
\end{equation}
Then we will estimate each term of $\Phi_K(t)$ in terms of some integral of $\Phi_K(t)$.
\begin{lemm}\label{lemma3.5}
There exists a positive constant $N=N(n,q)$ such that
\begin{equation}\label{3.23}
\|\nabla u^k(t)\|_{L^2}^2+\int_0^t \|\sqrt{\rho^k_t}u^k (s)\|_{L^2}^2ds \le C+C\int_0^t \Phi_K(s)^N ds
\end{equation}
for all $k,\ 1\le k \le K.$
\end{lemm}
\begin{proof}
Multiplying $\eqref{3.19}_2$ by $u_t^k$, integrating by parts and making use of $\eqref{3.20}_1$, we have
\begin{equation*}
\begin{aligned}
&\quad \int \rho^k |u_t^k|^2 dx+\frac{d}{dt}\int \mu(\rho^k)|D(u^k)|^2dx\\
& =-\int \rho^k (u^{k-1}\cdot \nabla) u^k \cdot u_t^kdx- \int \mu' (u^{k-1} \cdot \nabla \rho^k) |D(u^k)|^2dx
+\int \nabla d^k \odot \nabla d^k : \nabla u_t^k dx,
\end{aligned}
\end{equation*}
On account of the identity
\begin{equation*}
\int \nabla d^k \odot \nabla d^k : \nabla u_t^k dx
=\frac{d}{dt}\int \nabla d^k \odot \nabla d^k : \nabla u^k dx
-\int \nabla d_t^k \odot \nabla d^k : \nabla u^k+\nabla d_t^k \odot \nabla d_t^k : \nabla u^k dx.
\end{equation*}
We integrate over $(0, t)$ and apply \eqref{3.9} and $\eqref{3.19}_3$ to deduce that
\begin{equation}\label{3.24}
\begin{aligned}
& \quad \frac{1}{2C}\int |\nabla u^k|^2 dx-\int |\nabla d^k|^2|\nabla u^k|dx+\frac{1}{2}\int_0^t\int \rho^k |u_t^k|^2dxd\tau\\
& \le C+C\int_0^t \int
\left(\rho^k |u^{k-1}|^2|\nabla u^k|^2+|u^{k-1}| |\nabla \rho^k| |\nabla u^k|+|\nabla d^k| |\nabla d_t^k| |\nabla u^k|\right)dxd\tau\\
&=C+\sum_{i=1}^3 I_{3i}.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
Applying the Gagliardo-Nirenberg, H\"{o}lder and Young inequalities repeatedly, it arrives at
\begin{equation*}
\begin{aligned}
I_{31} & \le C\int_0^t \|u^{k-1}\|_{L^6}^2 \|\nabla u^k\|_{L^3}^2 d\tau
\le C\int_0^t \|\nabla u^{k-1}\|_{L^2}^2 \|\nabla u^k\|_{L^2}^{\frac{6-n}{3}}\|\nabla u^k\|_{H^1}^{\frac{n}{3}}d\tau\\
& \le\varepsilon \int_0^t \|\sqrt{\rho^k}u_t^k\|_{L^2}^2d\tau+C(\varepsilon)\int_0^t \Phi_K^{N_2}d\tau,\\
I_{32} & \le C\int_0^t \|\nabla \rho^k\|_{L^q} \|\nabla u^{k-1}\|_{L^2}\|\nabla u^k\|_{L^{\frac{12q}{5q-6}}}^2 d\tau\\
& \le C\int_0^t \|\nabla \rho^k\|_{L^q} \|\nabla u^{k-1}\|_{L^2}
\|\nabla u^k\|_{L^2}^{\frac{12q-n(q+6)}{6q}}\|\nabla u^k\|_{H^1}^{\frac{n(q+6)}{6q}}d\tau\\
&\le \varepsilon \int_0^t \|\sqrt{\rho^k}u_t^k\|_{L^2}^2d\tau+C(\varepsilon)\int_0^t \Phi_K^{N_3}d\tau,\\
I_{33} &\le \int_0^t \|\nabla d^k\|_{L^6}\|\nabla d_t^k\|_{L^2}\|\nabla u^k\|_{L^3}d\tau
\le C\int \|\nabla d^k\|_{H^1} \|\nabla d_t^k\|_{L^2}
\|\nabla u^k\|_{L^2}^{\frac{6-n}{3}} \|\nabla u^k\|_{H^1}^{\frac{n}{3}}d\tau\\
& \le\varepsilon \int_0^t \|\sqrt{\rho^k}u_t^k\|_{L^2}^2d\tau+C(\varepsilon)\int_0^t \Phi_K^{N_4}d\tau\\
\end{aligned}
\end{equation*}
for some $N_i=N_i(n,q)>0(i=2,3,4),$\ where we have used the following regularity estimate
\begin{equation}\label{3.25}
\|u^k\|_{H^2}+\|P^k\|_{H^1}\le C(1+\|\sqrt{\rho^k}u_t^k\|_{L^2})\Phi_K^{N_1} \quad {\rm for \ some}\ N_1=N_1(n,q)>0.
\end{equation}
Substituting $I_{3i}(i=1,2,3)$ into \eqref{3.24} and choosing $\varepsilon$ small enough yield
\begin{equation}\label{3.26}
\begin{aligned}
\frac{1}{2C}\int |\nabla u^k|^2 dx-\int |\nabla d^k|^2 |\nabla u^k|dx+\frac{1}{4}\int_0^t\int \rho^k |u_t^k|^2dxd\tau
\le C+C\int_0^t \Phi^{N_{5}}_K d\tau
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
for some $N_5=N_5(n, q)>0$.
In order to control the term $-\int |\nabla d^k|^2 |\nabla u^k|dx$ on left hand side of \eqref{3.26}, taking $\nabla$ operator to $\eqref{3.19}_4$, then we have
\begin{equation}\label{3.27}
\nabla d_t^k -\nabla \Delta d^k=\nabla \left[|\nabla d^{k-1}|^2 d^{k-1}-(u^{k-1}\cdot \nabla)d^{k-1}\right].
\end{equation}
Multiplying by $4|\nabla d^k|^2 \nabla d^k$, integrating (by parts)over $\Omega$ and exploiting the boundary condition
$\left.\frac{\partial d^k}{\partial \nu}\right|_{\partial \Omega}=0$, we get
\begin{equation}\label{3.28}
\begin{aligned}
&\quad \frac{d}{dt}\int |\nabla d^k|^4 dx+4\int |\nabla d^k|^2 |\Delta d^k|^2 dx\\
&\le C\int \left(|\nabla d^k|^3 |\nabla u^{k-1}| |\nabla d^{k-1}|+|\nabla d^k|^3 |u^{k-1}| |\nabla^2 d^{k-1}|
+|\nabla d^k|^3 |\nabla d^{k-1}|^3\right.\\
&\quad \quad \quad \quad \left.+|\nabla d^k|^3 |\nabla d^{k-1}| |\nabla^2 d^{k-1}|+|\nabla d^k|^2|\nabla^2 d^k|^2\right)dx
=\sum_{i=1}^5 I_{4i},
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
where we have used the fact
\begin{equation*}
\begin{aligned}
-\int \nabla \Delta d^k \cdot 4|\nabla d^k|^2 \nabla d^k dxc
&=\int 4|\nabla d^k|^2 |\Delta d^k|^2 dx+8\int \partial_j \partial_j d^k \partial_l \partial_i d^k \partial_l d^k \partial_i d^k dx.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation*}
Applying the H\"{o}lder and Gagliardo-Nirenberg inequalities, we have
\begin{equation*}
\begin{aligned}
I_{41} &\le \|\nabla d^{k-1}\|_{L^\infty} \|\nabla d^k\|_{L^6}^3 \|\nabla u^{k-1}\|_{L^2}
\le \|\nabla d^{k-1}\|_{H^2} \|\nabla d^k\|_{H^1}^3 \|\nabla u^{k-1}\|_{L^2}\le C\Phi_K^5,\\
I_{42} &\le \|\nabla d^k\|_{L^6}^3 \|u^{k-1}\|_{L^6} \|\nabla^2 d^{k-1}\|_{L^3}
\le \|\nabla d^k\|_{H^1}^3 \|\nabla u^{k-1}\|_{L^2} \|\nabla^2 d^{k-1}\|_{H^1}\le C\Phi_K^5,\\
I_{43} &\le \|\nabla d^k\|_{L^6}^3 \|\nabla d^{k-1}\|_{L^6}^3\le C\|\nabla d^k\|_{H^1}^3\|\nabla d^{k-2}\|_{H^1}^3
\le C\Phi_K^6,\\
I_{44} &\le \|\nabla d^k\|_{L^6}^3 \|\nabla d^{k-1}\|_{L^6}\|\nabla^2 d^{k-1}\|_{L^3}
\le \|\nabla d^k\|_{H^1}^3\|\nabla d^{k-1}\|_{H^1}\|\nabla^2 d^{k-1}\|_{H^1}\le C\Phi_K^5.\\
I_{45} &\le \|\nabla d^k\|_{L^\infty}^2 \|\nabla^2 d^k\|_{L^2}^2
\le C\|\nabla d^k\|_{H^2}^2 \|\nabla^2 d^k\|_{L^2}^2 \le C\Phi_K^4.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation*}
Substituting $I_{4i}(i=1,2,3,4,5)$ into \eqref{3.28} and integrating over $(0,t)$, it arrives at
\begin{equation}\label{3.29}
\int |\nabla d^k|^4dx+4\int_0^t\int |\nabla d^k|^2|\Delta d^k|^2dxd\tau \le C+C\int_0^t \Phi_K^6(s)ds.
\end{equation}
Choosing a constant $C_{*}$ sufficiently large such that
\begin{equation*}
\frac{1}{2C}|\nabla u^k|^2-|\nabla u^k| |\nabla d^k|^2+C_{*} |\nabla d^k|^4
\ge \frac{1}{4C}|\nabla u^k|^2+\frac{C_{*}}{2}|\nabla d^k|^4,
\end{equation*}
then $\eqref{3.26}+\eqref{3.29}\times C_{*}$ yields
\begin{equation*}
\int |\nabla u^k|^2dx+\int_0^t \int \rho^k |u_t^k|^2dxd\tau \le C+C\int_0^t \Phi_K^{N_6} d\tau,
\end{equation*}
for some $N_6=N_6(n,q)>0$. Hence, we complete the proof of lemma.
\end{proof}
Next, we estimate the term $\|\sqrt{\rho^k}u_t^k\|_{L^2}$ and $\|\nabla u_t^k\|_{L^2}$ to guarantee the higher regularity.
\begin{lemm}\label{lemma3.6}
There exists a positive constant $N=N(n,q)$ such that
\begin{equation}\label{3.30}
\|\sqrt{\rho^k}u_t^k(t)\|_{L^2}^2+\int_0^t \|\nabla u_t^k\|_{L^2}^2 ds \le C\exp\left[C\int_0^t \Phi_K^N(s)ds\right]
\end{equation}
for any $k,\ 1\le k \le K.$
\end{lemm}
\begin{proof}
Differentiating $\eqref{3.19}_2$ with respect to $t$, multiplying by $u_t^k$ and using $\eqref{3.19}_1$, then we get
\begin{equation}\label{3.31}
\begin{aligned}
&\quad \frac{1}{2}\frac{d}{dt}\int \rho^k |u_t^k|^2dx+\frac{1}{C}\int |\nabla u_t^k|^2 dx\\
&\le C \int \left(\rho^k|u^{k-1}| |u_t^k| |\nabla u_t^k| +\rho^k |u^{k-1}| |\nabla u^{k-1}| |u_t^k|
+\rho^k |u^{k-1}|^2 |\nabla^2 u^k| |u_t^k|
\right.\\
&\quad \quad \quad \left. + \rho^k |u^{k-1}|^2 |\nabla u^k| |\nabla u_t^k|+\rho^k |u_t^{k-1}| |\nabla u^k| |\nabla u_t^k|
+|\nabla d^k| |\nabla d_t^k| |\nabla u_t^k|\right. \\
&\quad \quad \quad \left. +|\partial_t \rho^k| |\nabla u^k| |\nabla u_t^k|\right)dx
=\sum_{i=1}^7 I_{5i}.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
To estimate the term $I_{5i}(1\le i \le 7)$, we make use of the H\"{o}lder, Gagliardo-Nirenberg and Young inequalities.
\begin{equation*}
\begin{aligned}
I_{51} & \le \|\rho^k\|_{L^\infty}^{\frac{1}{2}} \|u^{k-1}\|_{L^6}\|\sqrt{\rho^k}u_t^k\|_{L^3}\|\nabla u_t^k\|_{L^2}\\
& \le C\|\rho^k\|_{L^\infty}^{\frac{1}{2}} \|\nabla u^{k-1}\|_{L^2}
\|\sqrt{\rho^k}u_t^k\|_{L^2}^{\frac{1}{2}}\|\sqrt{\rho^k}u_t^k\|_{L^6}^{\frac{1}{2}}\|\nabla u_t^k\|_{L^2}\\
&\le C(\varepsilon)\|\sqrt{\rho^k}u_t^k\|_{L^2}^2 \Phi_K^4 +\varepsilon\|\nabla u_t^k\|_{L^2}^2,\\
I_{52} &\le \|\rho^k\|_{L^\infty}\|u^{k-1}\|_{L^6}\|\nabla u^{k-1}\|_{L^2}\|\nabla u^k\|_{L^6}\|u_t^k\|_{L^6}\\
& \le C(\varepsilon)\|\nabla u^{k-1}\|_{L^2}^4 \|u^k\|_{H^2}^2+\varepsilon\|\nabla u_t^k\|_{L^2}^2\\
&\le C(\varepsilon)(1+\|\sqrt{\rho^k}u_t^k\|_{L^2}^2) \Phi_K^{4+2N_1}+\varepsilon\|\nabla u_t^k\|_{L^2}^2,\\
I_{53} &\le \|\rho^k\|_{L^\infty} \|\nabla u^{k-1}\|_{L^2}^2 \|\nabla^2 u^k\|_{L^2} \|u_t^k\|_{L^6}\\
& \le C(\varepsilon)\|\nabla u^{k-1}\|_{L^2}^4 \|u^k\|_{H^2}^2+2+\varepsilon\|\nabla u_t^k\|_{L^2}^2\\
&\le C(\varepsilon)(1+\|\sqrt{\rho^k}u_t^k\|_{L^2}^2) \Phi_K^{4+2N_1}+\varepsilon\|\nabla u_t^k\|_{L^2}^2,\\
I_{54} &\le \|\rho^k\|_{L^\infty} \|\nabla u^{k-1}\|_{L^2}^2 \|\nabla u^k\|_{H^1} \|\nabla u_t^k\|_{L^2}\\
& \le C(\varepsilon)\|\nabla u^{k-1}\|_{L^2}^4 \|u^k\|_{H^2}^2+2+\varepsilon\|\nabla u_t^k\|_{L^2}^2\\
&\le C(\varepsilon)(1+\|\sqrt{\rho^k}u_t^k\|_{L^2}^2) \Phi_K^{4+2N_1}+\varepsilon\|\nabla u_t^k\|_{L^2}^2,\\
I_{55} &\le \|\rho^k\|_{L^\infty}^{\frac{1}{2}} \|u_t^{k-1}\|_{L^6} \|\nabla u^k\|_{L^2} \|\sqrt{\rho^k} u_t^k\|_{L^3}\\
& \le C\|\nabla u_t^{k-1}\|_{L^2} \|\nabla u^k\|_{L^2}
\|\sqrt{\rho^k} u_t^k\|_{L^2}^{\frac{1}{2}}\|\sqrt{\rho^k} u_t^k\|_{L^2}^{\frac{1}{2}}\\
&\le C(\varepsilon,\eta)\|\sqrt{\rho^k}u_t^k\|_{L^2}^2 \Phi_K^4 +\varepsilon\|\nabla u_t^k\|_{L^2}^2
+\eta\|\nabla u_t^{k-1}\|_{L^2}^2,\\
I_{56} &\le C(\varepsilon)\int |\nabla d^k|^2 |\nabla d^k_t|^2 dx+\varepsilon\|\nabla u_t^k\|_{L^2}^2\\
& \le C(\varepsilon)\|\nabla d^k\|_{L^\infty}^2\|\nabla d_t^k\|_{L^2}^2+\varepsilon\|\nabla u_t^k\|_{L^2}^2\\
&\le C(\varepsilon)\|\nabla d^k\|_{H^2}^2\|\nabla d_t^k\|_{L^2}^2+\varepsilon\|\nabla u_t^k\|_{L^2}^2,
\end{aligned}
\end{equation*}
where we have used \eqref{3.25}.
In order to control the term $\|\nabla d_t^k\|_{L^2}$, applying the $L^2-$estimate to the \eqref{3.27}, we obtain
\begin{equation}\label{3.32}
\begin{aligned}
&\quad \|\nabla d_t^k\|_{L^2}\le \|\nabla\left(\Delta d^k+|\nabla d^{k-1}|^2 d^{k-1}-u^{k-1}\cdot \nabla d^{k-1}\right)\|_{L^2}\\
&\le C\left(\|\nabla^3 d^k\|_{L^2}+\|\nabla d^{k-1}\|_{L^6}\|\nabla^2 d^{k-1}\|_{L^3}+\|\nabla d^{k-1}\|_{L^6}^3
\right.\\
&\quad \quad \quad \left.+\|\nabla d^{k-1}\|_{L^\infty}\|\nabla u^{k-1}\|_{L^2}+\|u^{k-1}\|_{L^6}\|\nabla^2 d^{k-1}\|_{L^3}\right)\\
&\le C\left(\|\nabla^3 d^k\|_{L^2}+\|\nabla d^{k-1}\|_{H^1}\|\nabla^2 d^{k-1}\|_{H^1}+\|\nabla d^{k-1}\|_{H^1}^3
\right.\\
&\quad \quad \quad \left.+\|\nabla d^{k-1}\|_{H^2}\|\nabla u^{k-1}\|_{L^2}+\|u^{k-1}\|_{H^1}\|\nabla^2 d^{k-1}\|_{H^1}\right)\\
& \le C\Phi_K^3.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
Substituting \eqref{3.32} into $I_{56} $ to deduce that
\begin{equation*}
I_{56} \le C(\varepsilon)\Phi_K^8+\varepsilon\|\nabla u_t^k\|_{L^2}^2.
\end{equation*}
Since the term $I_{57}$ is somewhat complicated, we will deal with it as follows:
If $n=2$, then
\begin{equation*}
\begin{aligned}
I_{57} &\le \int |u^{k-1}| |\nabla \rho^k| |\nabla u^k| |\nabla u_t^k| dx\\
&\le \|\nabla \rho^k\|_{L^q}\left\| |u^{k-1}| |\nabla u^k| \right\|_{L^{\frac{2q}{q-2}}}\|\nabla u_t^k \|_{L^2}\\
&\le\|\nabla \rho^k\|_{L^q} \|\nabla u^{k-1}\|_{L^2} \|\nabla u^k\|_{H^1}\|\nabla u_t^k \|_{L^2}\\
&\le C(\varepsilon)(1+\|\sqrt{\rho^k}u_t^k\|_{L^2}^2) \Phi_K^{4+2N_1}+\varepsilon\|\nabla u_t^k\|_{L^2}^2,\\
\end{aligned}
\end{equation*}
If $n=3$, then
\begin{equation*}
\begin{aligned}
I_{57} &\le \|\nabla \rho^k\|_{L^q}\|u^{k-1}\|_{L^6} \|\nabla u^k\|_{L^{\frac{3q}{q-3}}} \|\nabla u_t^k\|_{L^2}\\
&\le \|\nabla \rho^k\|_{L^q}\|\nabla u^{k-1}\|_{L^2}
\|\nabla u^k\|_{L^2}^{\frac{2q-6}{3q}} \|\nabla u^k\|_{L^\infty}^{\frac{q+6}{3q}}\|\nabla u_t^k\|_{L^2}\\
&\le C(\varepsilon)\Phi_K^{N_8}+\varepsilon\|\nabla u_t^k\|_{L^2}^2,
\end{aligned}
\end{equation*}
where we have used the regularity estimate
\begin{equation}\label{3.33}
\|u^k\|_{W^{2,r}}+\|P^k\|_{W^{1,r}}\le C(1+\|\nabla u_t^k\|_{L^2})\Phi_K^{N_7} \quad {\rm for \ some}\ N_7=N_7(n,q)>0.
\end{equation}
Substituting $I_{5i}(1\le i\le 7)$ into \eqref{3.31} and choosing $\varepsilon$ small enough, we get
\begin{equation*}
\frac{1}{2}\frac{d}{dt}\int \rho^k |u_t^k|^2 dx+\frac{1}{2C}\int |\nabla u_t^k|^2 dx
\le (1+\|\sqrt{\rho^k}u_t^k\|_{L^2}^2) \Phi_K^{N_9} +\eta\|\nabla u_t^{k-1}\|_{L^2}^2.
\end{equation*}
Fixing $\tau $ in $(0, T)$ and integrating over $(\tau, t)\subset(0, T)$, we have
\begin{equation*}
\begin{aligned}
&\quad \|\sqrt{\rho^k}u_t^k(t)\|_{L^2}^2+\int_\tau^t \|\nabla u_t^k\|_{L^2}^2 ds\\
&\le C\|\sqrt{\rho^k}u_t^k(\tau)\|_{L^2}^2+C\int_\tau^t(1+\|\sqrt{\rho^k}u_t^k\|_{L^2}^2)\Phi_K^{N_9}ds
+\frac{1}{2}\int_\tau^t \|\nabla u_t ^{k-1}\|_{L^2}^2 ds.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation*}
From the recursive relation of $\|\nabla u_t^k\|_{L^2}$, we get
\begin{equation*}
\begin{aligned}
\int_\tau^t \|\nabla u_t^k\|_{L^2}^2 ds
&\le C \left(\sum_{i=1}^{k}\frac{1}{2^{i-1}}\right)
\left(\|\sqrt{\rho^k}u_t^k(\tau)\|_{L^2}^2
+\int_\tau^t (1+\|\sqrt{\rho^k}u_t^k\|_{L^2}^2)\Phi_K^{N_9}ds\right)\\
&\le 2C\left(\|\sqrt{\rho^k}u_t^k(\tau)\|_{L^2}^2
+\int_\tau^t (1+\|\sqrt{\rho^k}u_t^k\|_{L^2}^2)\Phi_K^{N_9}ds\right).
\end{aligned}
\end{equation*}
Hence, we have the following estimate
\begin{equation*}
\|\sqrt{\rho^k}u_t^k(t)\|_{L^2}^2+\int_\tau^t \|\nabla u_t^k\|_{L^2}^2 ds
\le 2C\left(\|\sqrt{\rho^k}u_t^k(\tau)\|_{L^2}^2
+\int_\tau^t (1+\|\sqrt{\rho^k}u_t^k\|_{L^2}^2)\Phi_K^{N_9}ds\right).
\end{equation*}
Thanks to the compatibility condition \eqref{3.17}, making use of the Gr\"{o}nwall inequality, it arrives at
\begin{equation*}
\|\sqrt{\rho^k}u_t^k(t)\|_{L^2}^2+\int_0^t \|\nabla u_t^k\|_{L^2}^2 ds \le C\exp\left[C\int_0^t \Phi_K^{N_9}(s)ds\right],
\end{equation*}
which completes the proof of the lemma.
\end{proof}
As a corollary of Lemma \ref{lemma3.6}, we can obtain the following estimate immediately.
\begin{lemm}\label{lemma3.7}
There exists a positive constant $N=N(n,q)$ such that
\begin{equation}\label{3.34}
\|\nabla \rho^k(t)\|_{L^q}\le C \exp\left[C\exp(C\int_0^t \Phi_K^N(s)ds)\right]
\end{equation}
for any $k,\ 1\le k \le K.$
\end{lemm}
Now we turn to the estimate the second term $\|\nabla d^k\|_{H^2}$ in $\Phi_K$. Indeed, we should obtain the
following estimate first.
\begin{lemm}\label{lemma3.8}
There exists a positive constant $N=N(n,q)$ such that
\begin{equation}\label{3.35}
\|\nabla d^k(t)\|_{H^1}^2+\int_0^t \|\nabla d_t^k\|_{L^2}^2 ds \le C +C\int_0^t \Phi_K^N ds
\end{equation}
for any $k,\ 1\le k \le K.$
\end{lemm}
\begin{proof}
\textrm{Step 1:} Multiplying $\eqref{3.19}_4$ by $\Delta d^k$ and integrating (by parts) over $\Omega$, we get
\begin{equation*}
\quad \frac{1}{2}\frac{d}{dt}\int |\nabla d^k|^2 dx+\int |\Delta d^k|^2 dx\\
=\int \left[(u^{k-1} \cdot \nabla)d^{k-1}-|\nabla d^{k-1}|^2d^{k-1}\right]\cdot \Delta d^k dx.
\end{equation*}
Applying the H\"{o}lder and Gagliardo-Nirenberg inequalities, it arrives at
\begin{equation*}
\begin{aligned}
&\quad \frac{1}{2}\frac{d}{dt}\int |\nabla d^k|^2 dx+\int |\Delta d^k|^2 dx\\
&\le \int (|u^{k-1}| |\nabla d^{k-1}| |\nabla^2 d^k|+ |\nabla d^{k-1}|^2 |d^{k-1}| |\nabla^2 d^k|)dx\\
&\le \|u^{k-1}\|_{L^6} \|\nabla d^{k-1}\|_{L^3} \|\nabla^2 d^k\|_{L^2}+
\|\nabla d^{k-1}\|_{L^3}^2 \|\nabla^2 d^{k-1}\|_{L^3}
\le C\Phi_K^3.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation*}
Integrating the proceeding inequality over $(0, t)$, we have
\begin{equation}\label{3.36}
\int |\nabla d^k|^2 dx+\int_0^t \int |\Delta d^k|^2 dxd\tau \le C+C\int_0^t \Phi_K^3d\tau.
\end{equation}
\textrm{Step 2:}Multiplying \eqref{3.27} by $\nabla d_t^k$ and integrating (by parts) over $\Omega$ yield
\begin{equation*}
\begin{aligned}
&\quad \frac{1}{2}\frac{d}{dt}\int |\Delta d^k|^2 dx+\int |\nabla d_t^k|^2 dx\\
&\le C(\varepsilon)\int \left(|\nabla u^{k-1}|^2 |\nabla d^{k-1}|^2+|u^{k-1}|^2 |\nabla^2 d^{k-1}|^2
+|\nabla d^{k-1}|^6+|\nabla d^{k-1}|^2 |\nabla^2 d^{k-1}|^2\right)dx\\
&\quad \quad +\varepsilon\int |\nabla d_t^k|^2 dx,
\end{aligned}
\end{equation*}
where we have used the Cauchy inequality.
Choosing $\varepsilon$ small enough, integrating over $(0, t)$ and applying the H\"{o}lder, Sobolev inequality, it arrives at
\begin{equation*}
\begin{aligned}
&\quad \int |\Delta d^k(t)|^2 dx+\int_0^t \int |\nabla d_t^k|^2dxds\\
&\le C+C\int_0^t \int \left( |\nabla u^{k-1}|^2 |\nabla d^{k-1}|^2+|u^{k-1}|^2 |\nabla^2 d^{k-1}|^2
+|\nabla d^{k-1}|^6+|\nabla d^{k-1}|^2 |\nabla^2 d^{k-1}|^2\right)dxds\\
&\le C+C\int_0^t \left(\|\nabla d^{k-1}\|_{H^2}^2 \|\nabla u^{k-1}\|_{L^2}^2
+\|\nabla u^{k-1}\|_{L^2}^2\|\nabla^2 d^{k-1}\|_{H^1}^2
+\|\nabla d^{k-1}\|_{H^1}^6\right.\\
&\quad \left.+\|\nabla d^{k-1}\|_{H^2}^2\|\nabla^2 d^{k-1}\|_{L^2}^2\right)ds\\
&\le C+C\int_0^t \Phi_K^6 ds.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation*}
Hence, if applying the elliptic regularity, we obtain
\begin{equation*}
\int |\nabla^2 d^k(t)|^2 dx+\int_0^t \int |\nabla d_t^k|^2dxds\\
\le C+C\int_0^t \Phi_K^6 ds,
\end{equation*}
which, together with \eqref{3.36}, complete the proof of this lemma.
\end{proof}
Now, we can derive the high order estimate for $d^k$.
\begin{lemm}\label{lemma3.9}
There exists a positive constant $N=N(n,q)$ such that
\begin{equation}\label{3.37}
\|\nabla^3 d^k(t)\|_{L^2}^2+\int_0^t \|\nabla^2 d_t^k\|_{L^2}^2ds \le C\exp\left[C\int_0^t \Phi_K^N ds\right]
\end{equation}
for all $k, 1\le k \le K$.
\end{lemm}
\begin{proof}
Taking $\nabla$ operator to $\eqref{3.19}_4$, multiplying by $\nabla \Delta d_t^k$ and integrating over $\Omega$,
we have
\begin{equation}\label{3.38}
\begin{aligned}
&\quad \frac{1}{2}\frac{d}{dt}\int |\nabla\Delta d^k|^2 dx+\int |\Delta d_t^k|^2 dx\\
&=\frac{d}{dt}\int \nabla (u^{k-1}\cdot \nabla d^{k-1}-|\nabla d^{k-1}|^2 d^{k-1})\cdot \nabla \Delta d^k dx\\
& \quad \quad -\int \frac{\partial }{\partial t}\left[\nabla(u^{k-1}\cdot \nabla d^{k-1})-\nabla(|\nabla d^{k-1}|^2d^{k-1})\right]\cdot \nabla \Delta d^k dx.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
Now we need to estimate the second term of right hand side of \eqref{3.38} as follows:
\begin{equation}\label{3.39}
\begin{aligned}
&\quad -\int \frac{\partial }{\partial t}\left[\nabla(u^{k-1}\cdot \nabla d^{k-1})-\nabla(|\nabla d^{k-1}|^2d^{k-1})\right]\cdot \nabla \Delta d^k dx\\
&\le C\int \left(|\nabla u_t^{k-1}| |\nabla d^{k-1}|+|\nabla u^{k-1}| |\nabla d_t^{k-1}|
+|u_t^{k-1}| |\nabla^2 d^{k-1}|+|u^{k-1}| |\nabla^2 d_t^{k-1}| \right.\\
&\left.\quad \quad \quad \quad +|\nabla d_t^{k-1}| |\nabla^2 d^{k-1}|+|\nabla d^{k-1}| |\nabla^2 d_t^{k-1}|
+|\nabla d^{k-1}| |\nabla^2 d^{k-1}| |d_t^{k-1}|\right.\\
&\left.\quad \quad \quad \quad +|\nabla d^{k-1}|^2 |\nabla d_t^{k-1}|\right)|\nabla \Delta d^k|dx
=\sum_{i=1}^8 I_{6i}.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
To estimate each term $I_{6i}(1\le i \le 8)$, applying H\"{o}lder, Gagliardo-Nirenberg and Young inequalities, we obtain
\begin{equation*}
\begin{aligned}
I_{61} &\le \|\nabla d^{k-1}\|_{L^\infty} \|\nabla u_t^{k-1}\|_{L^2} \|\nabla^3 d^k\|_{L^2}
\le C\|\nabla d^{k-1}\|_{H^2} \|\nabla u_t^{k-1}\|_{L^2} \|\nabla^3 d^k\|_{L^2}\\
&\le C\Phi_K^4+C\|\nabla u_t^{k-1}\|_{L^2}^2,\\
I_{62} &\le \|\nabla u^{k-1}\|_{L^3} \|\nabla d_t^{k-1}\|_{L^6} \|\nabla^3 d^k\|_{L^2}
\le C\|\nabla u^{k-1}\|_{H^1} \|\nabla^2 d_t^{k-1}\|_{L^2} \|\nabla^3 d^k\|_{L^2}\\
&\le C(\delta)\|\nabla u^{k-1}\|_{H^1}^2 \|\nabla^3 d^k\|_{L^2}^2+\delta\|\nabla^2 d_t^{k-1}\|_{L^2}^2\\
&\le C(\delta)(1+\|\sqrt{\rho^k}u_t^k\|_{L^2}^2)\Phi_K^{2N_1+2}+\delta\|\nabla^2 d_t^{k-1}\|_{L^2}^2,\\
I_{63}&\le \|u_t^{k-1}\|_{L^6} \|\nabla^2 d^{k-1}\|_{L^3} \|\nabla^3 d^k\|_{L^2}
\le C\|\nabla u_t^{k-1}\|_{L^2} \|\nabla^2 d^{k-1}\|_{H^1} \|\nabla^3 d^k\|_{L^2}\\
&\le C\Phi_K^4+C\|\nabla u_t^{k-1}\|_{L^2}^2,\\
I_{64}&\le \|u^{k-1}\|_{L^\infty} \|\nabla^2 d_t^{k-1}\|_{L^2} \|\nabla^3 d^k\|_{L^2}
\le C\|u^{k-1}\|_{H^2}\|\nabla^3 d^k\|_{L^2}\|\nabla^2 d_t^{k-1}\|_{L^2}\\
&\le C(\delta)\|u^{k-1}\|_{H^2}^2 \|\nabla^3 d^k\|_{L^2}^2+\delta \|\nabla^2 d_t^{k-1}\|_{L^2}^2\\
&\le C(\delta)(1+\|\sqrt{\rho^k}u_t^k\|_{L^2}^2)\Phi_K^{2N_1+2}+\delta \|\nabla^2 d_t^{k-1}\|_{L^2}^2,\\
I_{65} &\le \|\nabla d_t^{k-1}\|_{L^6} \|\nabla^2 d^{k-1}\|_{L^3} \|\nabla^3 d^k\|_{L^2}
\le C\|\nabla^2 d_t^{k-1}\|_{L^2} \|\nabla^2 d^{k-1}\|_{H^1} \|\nabla^3 d^k\|_{L^2}\\
&\le C(\delta)\Phi_K^4+\delta \|\nabla^2 d_t^{k-1}\|_{L^2}^2,\\
I_{66}&\le \|\nabla d^{k-1}\|_{L^\infty} \|\nabla^2 d_t^{k-1}\|_{L^2} \|\nabla^3 d^k\|_{L^2}
\le C\|\nabla d^{k-1}\|_{H^2} \|\nabla^3 d\|_{L^2} \|\nabla^2 d_t^{k-1}\|_{L^2}\\
&\le C(\delta)\Phi_K^4+\delta \|\nabla^2 d_t^{k-1}\|_{L^2}^2,\\
I_{67} &\le \|\nabla d^{k-1}\|_{L^\infty} \|\nabla^2 d^{k-1}\|_{L^3} \|d_t^{k-1}\|_{L^6}\|\nabla^3 d^k\|_{L^2}\\
&\le C\|\nabla d^{k-1}\|_{H^2} \|\nabla^2 d^{k-1}\|_{H^1} \|d_t^{k-1}\|_{H^1}\|\nabla^3 d^k\|_{L^2}
\le C\Phi_K^6,\\
I_{68} &\le \|\nabla d^{k-1}\|_{L^6}^2 \|\nabla d_t^{k-1}\|_{L^6} \|\nabla^3 d^k\|_{L^2}
\le \|\nabla d^{k-1}\|_{H^1}^2 \|\nabla^2 d_t^{k-1}\|_{L^2} \|\nabla^3 d^k\|_{L^2}\\
&\le C(\delta)\Phi_K^6+\delta \|\nabla^2 d_t^{k-1}\|_{L^2}^2,\\
\end{aligned}
\end{equation*}
where we have used \eqref{3.25}, \eqref{3.32} and \eqref{3.33}.
Substituting $I_{6i}(1\le i\le 8)$ into \eqref{3.39}, integrating \eqref{3.38} over $(0, t)$
and applying \eqref{3.30}, then we have
\begin{equation}\label{3.40}
\begin{aligned}
&\quad \frac{1}{2}\int |\nabla^3 d^k|^2dx+\int_0^t\int |\nabla^2 d_t^k|^2 dxds\\
&\le \int \left(|\nabla u^{k-1}| |\nabla d^{k-1}|+ |u^{k-1}| |\nabla^2 d^{k-1}|+ |\nabla d^{k-1}| |\nabla^2 d^{k-1}| + |\nabla d^{k-1}|^3\right)|\nabla \Delta d^k|dx\\
&\quad \quad \quad +C\exp\left[C\int_0^t \Phi_K^{N_{10}} ds\right]+\delta \int_0^t \|\nabla^2 d_t^{k-1}\|_{L^2}^2 ds\\
&= \sum_{i=1}^{4} I_{7i}+C\exp\left[C\int_0^t \Phi_K^{N_{10}} ds\right]+\delta \int_0^t \|\nabla^2 d_t^{k-1}\|_{L^2}^2 ds.\\
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
By H\"{o}lder, Gagliardo-Nirenberg and Young inequalities, we obtain
\begin{equation*}
\begin{aligned}
I_{71} &\le \|\nabla d^{k-1}\|_{L^\infty} \|\nabla u^{k-1}\|_{L^2} \|\nabla^3 d^k\|_{L^2}
\le C\|\nabla d^{k-1}\|_{L^2}^\frac{4-n}{4}\|\nabla d^{k-1}\|_{H^2}^{\frac{n}{4}}
\|\nabla u^{k-1}\|_{L^2} \|\nabla^3 d^k\|_{L^2}\\
&\le C\|\nabla d^{k-1}\|_{H^1}\|\nabla u^{k-1}\|_{L^2} \|\nabla^3 d^k\|_{L^2}
+C\|\nabla d^{k-1}\|_{L^2}^\frac{4-n}{4} \|\nabla^3 d^{k-1}\|_{L^2}^\frac{n}{4}
\|\nabla u^{k-1}\|_{L^2} \|\nabla^3 d^k\|_{L^2}\\
&\le \varepsilon\|\nabla^3 d^k\|_{L^2}^2+\eta \|\nabla^3 d^{k-1}\|_{L^2}^2
+C(\varepsilon,\eta)\left(\|\nabla d^{k-1}\|_{H^1}^2 \|\nabla u^{k-1}\|_{L^2}^2
+\|\nabla d^{k-1}\|_{L^2}^2 \|\nabla u^{k-1}\|_{L^2}^\frac{8}{4-n}\right),\\
\end{aligned}
\end{equation*}
\begin{equation*}
\begin{aligned}
I_{72} &\le \|u^{k-1}\|_{L^6} \|\nabla^2 d^{k-1}\|_{L^3}\|\nabla^3 d^k\|_{L^2}\\
&\le \|\nabla u^{k-1}\|_{L^2} \|\nabla^2 d^{k-1}\|_{L^2} \|\nabla^3 d^k\|_{L^2}
+C\|\nabla u^{k-1}\|_{L^2} \|\nabla^2 d^{k-1}\|_{L^2}^\frac{6-n}{6}
\|\nabla^3 d^{k-1}\|_{L^2}^\frac{n}{6} \|\nabla^3 d^k\|_{L^2}\\
&\le \varepsilon\|\nabla^3 d^k\|_{L^2}^2+\eta \|\nabla^3 d^{k-1}\|_{L^2}^2
+C(\varepsilon,\eta)\left(\|\nabla^2 d^{k-1}\|_{L^2}^2 \|\nabla u^{k-1}\|_{L^2}^2
+\|\nabla^2 d^{k-1}\|_{L^2}^2 \|\nabla u^{k-1}\|_{L^2}^{\frac{12}{6-n}}\right),\\
I_{73} &\le \|\nabla d^{k-1}\|_{L^6} \|\nabla^2 d^{k-1}\|_{L^3} \|\nabla^3 d^k\|_{L^2}
\le C\|\nabla d^{k-1}\|_{H^1} \|\nabla^2 d^{k-1}\|_{L^2}^\frac{6-n}{6}\|\nabla^2 d^{k-1}\|_{H^1}^\frac{n}{6}
\|\nabla^3 d^k\|_{L^2}\\
&\le C \|\nabla d^{k-1}\|_{H^1}^2 \|\nabla^3 d^k\|_{L^2}
+C\|\nabla d^{k-1}\|_{H^1}^\frac{12-n}{6} \|\nabla^3 d^{k-1}\|_{L^2}^\frac{n}{6} \|\nabla^3 d^k\|_{L^2}\\
&\le \varepsilon\|\nabla^3 d^k\|_{L^2}^2+\eta \|\nabla^3 d^{k-1}\|_{L^2}^2
+C(\varepsilon,\eta)\left(\|\nabla d^{k-1}\|_{H^1}^4+\|\nabla d^{k-1}\|_{H^1}^{\frac{2(12-n)}{6-n}} \right),\\
I_{74} &\le \|\nabla d^{k-1}\|_{L^6}^3 \|\nabla^3 d^k\|_{L^2}
\le \|\nabla d^{k-1}\|_{H^1}^3 \|\nabla^3 d^k\|_{L^2}\\
&\le \varepsilon\|\nabla^3 d^k\|_{L^2}^2+C(\varepsilon)\|\nabla d^{k-1}\|_{H^1}^6.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation*}
Substituting $I_{7i}(1\le i\le 4)$ into \eqref{3.40}, applying \eqref{3.23} and \eqref{3.35} and choosing $\varepsilon$ small enough, we obtain
\begin{equation*}
\begin{aligned}
&\quad \frac{1}{4}\int |\nabla^3 d^k|^2 dx+\int_0^t \int |\nabla^2 d_t^k|^2 dxds\\
&\le\eta\|\nabla^3 d^{k-1}\|_{L^2}^2+\delta \int_0^t \int |\nabla^2 d_t^{k-1}|^2 dxds
+C(\delta, \eta)\exp\left[C\int_0^t \Phi_K^{N_{11}} ds\right].
\end{aligned}
\end{equation*}
Choosing $\delta$ and $\eta$ suitably small, we have
\begin{equation*}
\|\nabla^3 d^k\|_{L^2}^2+\int_0^t \|\nabla^2 d_t^k\|_{L^2}^2 ds
\le \frac{1}{2}\left(\|\nabla^3 d^{k-1}\|_{L^2}^2+\int_0^t \|\nabla^2 d_t^{k-1}\|_{L^2}^2 ds \right)
+C\exp\left[C\int_0^t \Phi_K^{N_{11}} ds\right].
\end{equation*}
By recursive relation, it arrives at
\begin{equation*}
\|\nabla^3 d^k\|_{L^2}^2+\int_0^t \|\nabla^2 d_t^k\|_{L^2}^2 ds
\le C\left(\sum_{i=1}^{k}\frac{1}{2^{i-1}}\right)\exp\left[C\int_0^t \Phi_K^{N_{11}} ds\right],
\end{equation*}
which completes the proof.
\end{proof}
Now, from Lemmas \ref{lemma3.5}-\ref{lemma3.9}, we conclude that
\begin{equation*}
\Phi_K(t)\le C \exp \left[C\exp\left(C\int_0^t \Phi_K^N ds\right)\right].
\end{equation*}
for some $N=N(n,q)>0$.
Thanks to this integral inequality, we can easily show that there exists a time $T_0\in (0, T)$(See Lemma $6$ \cite{Simon}), depending only on the parameters of $C$ such that
\begin{equation*}
\underset{0 \le t \le T_0}{\sup}\Phi_K(t) \le C.
\end{equation*}
Therefore, using the previous Lemmas \ref{lemma3.5}-\ref{lemma3.9} and other three estimates, we can derive the following
uniform bounds:
\begin{equation*}
\begin{aligned}
& \underset{0 \le t \le T_0}{\sup}\left(\|\rho^k\|_{W^{1,q}}+\|\rho^k_t\|_{L^q}+\|\sqrt{\rho^k}u_t^k\|_{L^2}
+\|u^k\|_{H^2}+\|P^k\|_{H^1}+\|d^k\|_{H^3}+\|\nabla d_t^k\|_{L^2}^2\right)\\
&\quad +\int_0^{T_0} \left(\|u^k\|_{W^{2,r}}^2+\|P^k\|_{W^{1,r}}^2+\|\nabla^4 d^k\|_{L^2}^2
+\|\nabla^2 d^k_t\|_{L^2}^2+\|d_{tt}\|_{L^2}^2\right)dt \le C,
\end{aligned}
\end{equation*}
for all $k \ge 1$.
\subsubsection{Convergence}
\quad We next show that the whole sequence $(\rho^k, u^k, d^k)$ of approximate solution converges to a solution to
the original problem \eqref{1.1}-\eqref{1.4} in a strong sense. To prove this, let us define:
\begin{equation*}
\bar{\rho}^{k+1}=\rho^{k+1}-\rho^k, \quad \bar{u}^{k+1}=u^{k+1}-u^{k} \quad \text{and} \quad \bar{d}^{k+1}=d^{k+1}-d^{k}.
\end{equation*}
\textrm{Step 1:} It follows from the linearized momentum equation $\eqref{3.19}_2$ that
\begin{equation}\label{3.41}
\begin{aligned}
&\quad \rho^{k+1}\bar{u}^{k+1}_t+\rho^{k+1}u^k \cdot \nabla \bar{u}^{k+1}
-{\rm div}[2 \mu(\rho^{k+1})D(\bar{u}^{k+1})]+\nabla(P^{k+1}-P^k)\\
&=-\bar{\rho}^{k+1} u_t^k-\bar{\rho}^{k+1} u^k \cdot \nabla u^k-\rho^k \bar{u}^k \cdot \nabla u^k
+{\rm div}\left[2(\mu(\rho^{k+1})-\mu(\rho^k))D(u^k)\right]\\
&\quad -{\rm div}(\nabla \bar{d}^{k+1} \odot \nabla d^{k+1}
+\nabla d^k \odot \nabla \bar{d}^{k+1}).
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
Hence multiplying \eqref{3.41} by $\bar{u}^{k+1}$ and integrating (by parts) over $\Omega$, we get
\begin{equation}\label{3.42}
\begin{aligned}
&\quad \frac{1}{2}\frac{d}{dt}\int \rho^{k+1}|\bar{u}^{k+1}|^2dx+\frac{1}{C}\int |\nabla \bar{u}^{k+1}|^2 dx\\
&=\int\left\{-\bar{\rho}^{k+1} u_t^k-\bar{\rho}^{k+1} u^k \cdot \nabla u^k-\rho^k \bar{u}^k \cdot \nabla u^k
+{\rm div}\left[2(\mu(\rho^{k+1})-\mu(\rho^k))D(u^k)\right]\right.\\
&\quad \quad \quad \left. -{\rm div}(\nabla \bar{d}^{k+1} \odot \nabla d^{k+1}
+\nabla d^k \odot \nabla \bar{d}^{k+1})\right\} \cdot \bar{u}^{k+1}dx
=\sum_{i=1}^4 I_{8i}.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
To estimate $I_{8i}(1\le i\le 4)$, using H\"{o}lder, Sobolev and Young inequalities, we obtain
\begin{equation*}
\begin{aligned}
I_{81}
&\le \|\bar{\rho}^{k+1}\|_{L^2} \|u_t^k-u^k \cdot \nabla u^k\|_{L^3} \|\bar{u}^{k+1}\|_{L^6}
\le C\|\bar{\rho}^{k+1}\|_{L^2}\|u_t^k-u^k \cdot \nabla u^k\|_{L^3} \|\nabla \bar{u}^{k+1}\|_{L^2}\\
&\le C(\varepsilon)\|\bar{\rho}^{k+1}\|_{L^2}^2\|u_t^k-u^k \cdot \nabla u^k\|_{L^3}^2
+\varepsilon \|\nabla \bar{u}^{k+1}\|_{L^2}^2,\\
I_{82}
&\le \|\rho^k\|_{L^\infty}^{\frac{1}{2}} \|\sqrt{\rho^k}\bar{u}^k\|_{L^2} \|\nabla u^k\|_{L^3}
\|\bar{u}^{k+1}\|_{L^6}
\le \|\rho^k\|_{L^\infty}^{\frac{1}{2}} \|\sqrt{\rho^k}\bar{u}^k\|_{L^2} \|\nabla u^k\|_{L^3}
\|\nabla \bar{u}^{k+1}\|_{L^2}\\
&\le C(\varepsilon)\|\rho^k\|_{L^\infty} \|\sqrt{\rho^k}\bar{u}^k\|_{L^2}^2 \|\nabla u^k\|_{L^3}^2
+\varepsilon \|\nabla \bar{u}^{k+1}\|_{L^2}^2,\\
I_{83}
&\le C\int |\bar{\rho}^{k+1}| |\nabla u^k| |\nabla \bar{u}^{k+1}| dx
\le C(\varepsilon)\int |\bar{\rho}^{k+1}|^2 |\nabla u^k|^2 dx+\varepsilon\int |\nabla \bar{u}^{k+1}|^2dx\\
&\le C(\varepsilon)\|\nabla u^k\|_{W^{1,r}}^2 \|\bar{\rho}^{k+1}\|_{L^2}^2
+\varepsilon \|\nabla \bar{u}^{k+1}\|_{L^2}^2,\\
I_{84}
&\le \int (|\nabla d^{k+1}|+|\nabla d^k|)|\nabla \bar{d}^{k+1}| |\nabla \bar{u}^{k+1}|dx\\
& \le C(\varepsilon)\int (|\nabla d^{k+1}|^2+|\nabla d^k|^2)|\nabla \bar{d}^{k+1}|^2 dx
+\varepsilon \int |\nabla \bar{u}^{k+1}|^2 dx\\
&\le C(\varepsilon)(\|\nabla d^{k+1}\|_{H^2}^2+\|\nabla d^{k}\|_{H^2}^2)\|\nabla \bar{d}^{k+1}\|_{L^2}^2+
+\varepsilon \int |\nabla \bar{u}^{k+1}|^2 dx.\\
\end{aligned}
\end{equation*}
Substituting $I_{8i}(1\le i\le 4)$ into \eqref{3.42} and choosing $\varepsilon$ small enough, it arrives at
\begin{equation}\label{3.43}
\begin{aligned}
&\quad \frac{1}{2}\frac{d}{dt}\int \rho^{k+1}|\bar{u}^{k+1}|^2dx+\frac{1}{2C}\int |\nabla \bar{u}^{k+1}|^2 dx\\
&\le C(\|u_t^k-u^k \cdot \nabla u^k\|_{L^3}^2+\|\nabla u^k\|_{W^{1,r}}^2)\|\bar{\rho}^{k+1}\|_{L^2}^2
+C\|\rho^k\|_{L^\infty}\|\nabla u^k\|_{L^3}^2 \|\sqrt{\rho^k}\bar{u}^k\|_{L^2}^2\\
&\quad \quad +C(\|\nabla d^{k+1}\|_{H^2}^2+\|\nabla d^{k}\|_{H^2}^2)\|\nabla \bar{d}^{k+1}\|_{L^2}^2.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
\textrm{Step 2:} Since we have
$\bar{\rho}_t^{k+1}+u^k \cdot \nabla \bar{\rho}^{k+1}+\bar{u}^k \cdot \nabla \rho^k=0,$ then
multiplying by $\bar{\rho}^{k+1}$ and integrating over $\Omega$ yield
\begin{equation}\label{3.44}
\begin{aligned}
&\quad \frac{1}{2}\frac{d}{dt}\int |\bar{\rho}^{k+1}|^2 dx
=-\int u^k \cdot \nabla\left(\frac{1}{2}|\bar{\rho}^{k+1}|^2\right)
- \int \bar{u}^k \cdot \nabla \rho^k \cdot \bar{\rho}^{k+1}dx\\
&\le C\int |\bar{\rho}^{k+1}|^2 |\nabla u^k| dx
+\|\nabla \rho^k\|_{L^q}\|\bar{\rho}^{k+1}\|_{L^2}\|\bar{u}^k\|_{L^{\frac{2q}{q-2}}}\\
&\le C\|\nabla u^k\|_{L^\infty}\|\bar{\rho}^{k+1}\|_{L^2}^2
+\|\nabla \rho^k\|_{L^q}\|\bar{\rho}^{k+1}\|_{L^2}\|\nabla \bar{u}^k\|_{L^2}\\
&\le C(\delta)(\|\nabla u^k\|_{W^{1,r}}+\|\nabla \rho^k\|_{L^q}^2)\|\bar{\rho}^{k+1}\|_{L^2}^2
+\delta \|\nabla \bar{u}^k\|_{L^2}^2,
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
where we have used Young and Sobolev inequalities.
\textrm{Step 3:} since we have
\begin{equation}\label{3.45}
\bar{d}^{k+1}_t-\Delta \bar{d}^{k+1}
=\nabla \bar{d}^k \cdot (\nabla d^k+\nabla d^{k-1})\cdot d^k+|\nabla d^{k-1}|^2 \bar{d}^k
-(\bar{u}^k \cdot \nabla) d^k-(u^{k-1}\cdot \nabla)\bar{d}^k.
\end{equation}
Multiplying \eqref{3.45} by $-\Delta \bar{d}^{k+1}$ and integrating (by parts) over $\Omega$, we obtain
\begin{equation}\label{3.46}
\begin{aligned}
&\quad \frac{1}{2}\frac{d}{dt}\int|\nabla \bar{d}^{k+1}|^2 dx+\int |\Delta \bar{d}^{k+1}|^2dx\\
&=\int \left[\nabla \bar{d}^{k+1}: (\nabla d^k+\nabla d^{k-1})d+|\nabla d^{k-1}|^2 \bar{d}^k
-(\bar{u}^k \cdot)d^k-(u^{k-1 \cdot \nabla})\bar{d}^k\right]\cdot (-\Delta \bar{d}^{k+1})dx\\
&=\sum_{i=1}^4 I_{9i}.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
To estimate $I_{9i}(1 \le i\le 4)$, using H\"{o}lder, Young and Sobolev inequalities, we have
\begin{equation*}
\begin{aligned}
I_{91}
&\le \int |\nabla \bar{d}^k| (|\nabla d^k|+|\nabla d^{k-1}|)|d^k| |\Delta \bar{d}^{k+1}| dx\\
&\le C(\varepsilon)\int |\nabla \bar{d}^k|^2(|\nabla d^k|+|\nabla d^{k-1}|)^2 dx
+\varepsilon\|\Delta \bar{d}^{k+1}\|_{L^2}^2\\
&\le C(\varepsilon)(\|\nabla d^k\|_{L^\infty}^2+\|\nabla d^{k-1}\|_{L^\infty}^2)\|\nabla \bar{d}^k\|_{L^2}^2
+\varepsilon\|\Delta \bar{d}^{k+1}\|_{L^2}^2,\\
I_{92}
&\le C(\varepsilon)\int |\nabla d^{k-1}|^4 |\bar{d}^k|^2dx+\varepsilon\|\Delta \bar{d}^{k+1}\|_{L^2}^2\\
&\le C(\varepsilon)\|\nabla d^{k-1}\|_{L^6}^4 \|\bar{d}^k\|_{L^6}^2+\varepsilon\|\Delta \bar{d}^{k+1}\|_{L^2}^2\\
&\le C(\varepsilon)\|\nabla d^{k-1}\|_{H^1}^4\|\nabla \bar{d}^k\|_{L^2}^2+\varepsilon\|\Delta \bar{d}^{k+1}\|_{L^2}^2,\\
I_{93}
&=-\int \partial_j \bar{u}_i^k \partial_i d^k \partial_j \bar{d}^{k+1}
+\bar{u}_i^k \partial_i \partial_j d^k \partial_j \bar{d}^{k+1}dx\\
&\le C\int (|\nabla \bar{u}^k| |\nabla d^k| |\nabla \bar{d}^{k+1}| + |\bar{u}^k| |\nabla^2 d^k| |\nabla \bar{d}^{k+1}|)dx\\
&\le C\|\nabla d^k\|_{L^\infty} \|\nabla \bar{u}^k\|_{L^2} \|\nabla \bar{d}^{k+1}\|_{L^2}
+ C\| \bar{u}^k\|_{L^6} \|\nabla^2 d^k\|_{L^3} \|\nabla \bar{d}^{k+1}\|_{L^2}\\
&\le C(\delta)\|\nabla d^k\|_{H^2}^2 \|\nabla \bar{d}^{k+1}\|_{L^2}^2
+C(\delta)\|\nabla^2 d^k\|_{L^6}^2 \|\nabla \bar{d}^{k+1}\|_{L^2}^2
+\delta \|\nabla \bar{u}^k\|_{L^2}^2\\
&\le C(\delta)\|\nabla d^k\|_{H^2}^2 \|\nabla \bar{d}^{k+1}\|_{L^2}^2 +\delta \|\nabla \bar{u}^k\|_{L^2}^2,\\
I_{94}
&\le C(\varepsilon)\int |u^{k-1}|^2 |\nabla \bar{d}^k|^2 dx+\varepsilon\|\Delta \bar{d}^{k+1}\|_{L^2}^2\\
&\le C(\varepsilon)\|u^{k-1}\|_{H^2}^2 \|\nabla \bar{d}^k\|_{L^2}^2 dx+\varepsilon\|\Delta \bar{d}^{k+1}\|_{L^2}^2.\\
\end{aligned}
\end{equation*}
Substituting $I_{9i}(1 \le i\le 4)$ into \eqref{3.46} and choosing $\varepsilon$ small enough, we get
\begin{equation}\label{3.47}
\begin{aligned}
&\quad \frac{1}{2}\frac{d}{dt}\int|\nabla \bar{d}^{k+1}|^2 dx+\int |\Delta \bar{d}^{k+1}|^2dx\\
&\le C(\|\nabla d^k\|_{H^2}^2+\|\nabla d^{k-1}\|_{H^2}^2 +\|\nabla d^{k-1}\|_{H^1}^2+\|u^{k-1}\|_{H^2}^2)
\|\nabla \bar{d}^k\|_{L^2}^2\\
&\quad \quad +C(\delta)\|\nabla d^k\|_{H^2}^2 \|\nabla \bar{d}^{k+1}\|_{L^2}^2
+\delta \|\nabla \bar{u}^k\|_{L^2}^2.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
Denoting
\begin{equation*}
\begin{aligned}
& \varphi^k(t)=\|\bar{\rho}^k(t)\|_{L^2}^2+\|\sqrt{\rho^k}\bar{u}^k\|_{L^2}^2+\|\nabla \bar{d}^k\|_{L^2}^2,\\
& \psi^k(t)=\|\nabla \bar{u}^k(t)\|_{L^2}^2+\|\Delta \bar{d}^k(t)\|_{L^2}^2,\\
& F^k(t)=\|u_t^k-u^k \cdot \nabla u^k\|_{L^3}^2+\|\nabla u^k\|_{W^{1,r}}^2+\|\nabla \rho^k\|_{L^q}^2
+\|\nabla d^k\|_{H^2}^2+\|\nabla d^{k+1}\|_{H^2}^2,\\
\end{aligned}
\end{equation*}
and
\begin{equation*}
\begin{aligned}
& G^k(t)=\|\rho^k\|_{L^\infty}^2\|\nabla u^k\|_{L^3}^2+\|\nabla d^k\|_{H^2}^2+\|\nabla^2 d^{k-1}\|_{L^2}^2+
\|\nabla d^{k-1}\|_{H^1}^4+\|\nabla d^{k+1}\|_{H^2}^2.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation*}
Then $\eqref{3.43}+\eqref{3.44}+\eqref{3.47}$ yields
\begin{equation*}
\varphi^{k+1}(t)+\int_0^t \psi^{k+1}(s)ds
\le \int_0^t \left[C\varphi^k(s)+\delta \psi^k(s)\right]ds+\int_0^t CF^k(s)\varphi^{k+1}(s)ds,
\end{equation*}
which implies, by virtue of Gr\"{o}nwall inequality, that
\begin{equation*}
\varphi^{k+1}(t)+\int_0^t \psi^{k+1}(s)ds
\le C\exp(C_\delta t)\int_0^t \left[C\varphi^k(s)+\delta \psi^k(s)\right]ds.
\end{equation*}
Choosing $\delta>0$ and $T_{1}$ so small that $8C(T_1+\delta)<1$ and $\exp(C_\delta T_1)<2$, then
\begin{equation*}
\varphi^{k+1}(t)+\int_0^t \psi^{k+1}(s)ds
\le \frac{1}{4}\left[\varphi^{k}(t)+\int_0^t \psi^{k}(s)ds\right],
\end{equation*}
for all $1\le k \le K.$ By iteration, we have
\begin{equation*}
\varphi^{k+1}(t)+\int_0^t \psi^{k+1}(s)ds
\le \frac{1}{4^k}\left[\varphi^{1}(t)+\int_0^t \psi^{1}(s)ds\right], \quad k \ge 0.
\end{equation*}
Together with the Poincar\'{e} inequality and elliptic estimate, we get
\begin{equation*}
\begin{aligned}
&\|\bar{\rho}^{k+1}\|_{L^\infty(0,T;L^2)}+\|\sqrt{\rho^{k+1}}\bar{u}^{k+1}\|_{L^\infty(0,T;L^2)}
+\|\bar{d}^{k+1}\|_{L^\infty(0,T;H^1)}\\
&\quad +\|\bar{u}^{k+1}\|_{L^2(0,T;H^1)}
+\|\bar{d}^{k+1}\|_{L^2(0,T;H^2)}\le \frac{C}{2^k}.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation*}
Therefore, we get
\begin{equation*}
\begin{aligned}
& \sum_{k=1}^\infty \|\bar{\rho}^{k+1}\|_{L^\infty(0,T;L^2)}<\infty,\\
& \sum_{k=1}^\infty \|\bar{u}^{k+1}\|_{L^2(0,T;H^1)}<\infty,\\
& \sum_{k=1}^\infty (\|\bar{d}^{k+1}\|_{L^\infty(0,T;H^1)}+\|\bar{d}^{k+1}\|_{L^2(0,T;H^2)})<\infty,\\
\end{aligned}
\end{equation*}
which means
\begin{equation*}
\begin{aligned}
& \rho^k \rightarrow \rho^1+\sum_{i=2}^\infty \bar{\rho}^i \quad {\text in} \quad L^\infty(0,T;L^2),\\
& u^k \rightarrow u^1+\sum_{i=2}^\infty \bar{u}^i \quad {\text in} \quad L^2(0,T;H^1),\\
& d^k \rightarrow d^1+\sum_{i=2}^\infty \bar{d}^i \quad {\text in} \quad L^\infty(0,T;H^1)\cap L^2(0,T;H^2),\\
\end{aligned}
\end{equation*}
as $k \rightarrow \infty.$
\subsubsection{Conclusion}
\quad Now it is a simple matter to check that $(\rho, u, d)$ is a weak solution to the original problem \eqref{1.1}-\eqref{1.4}
with positive initial density. Then, by virtue of the lower semi-continuity of norms, we deduce from the uniform bound that
$(\rho, u, P, d)$ satisfies the following regularity estimate:
\begin{equation*}
\begin{aligned}
& \underset{0 \le t \le T_0}{\sup}\left(\|\rho\|_{W^{1,q}}+\|\rho_t\|_{L^q}+\|\sqrt{\rho}u_t\|_{L^2}
+\|u\|_{H^2}+\|P\|_{H^1}+\|d\|_{H^3}+\|\nabla d_t\|_{L^2}^2\right)\\
&\quad +\int_0^{T_0} \left(\|u\|_{W^{2,r}}^2+\|P\|_{W^{1,r}}^2+\|\nabla^4 d\|_{L^2}^2
+\|\nabla^2 d_t\|_{L^2}^2+\|d_{tt}\|_{L^2}^2\right)dt \le C.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation*}
\subsection{Proof of Theorem \ref{Theorem1.1}}
\quad Let $(\rho_0, u_0, d_0)$ satisfies the assumptions in Theorem \ref{Theorem1.1}. For each $\delta>0$, let
$\rho_0^\delta=\rho_0+\delta$, satisfying
\begin{center}
$\rho_0^\delta \rightarrow \rho_0$ in $W^{1,.q}$ as $\delta \rightarrow 0^+$,
\end{center}
and $d_0^\delta=d_0$. Suppose $(u^\delta, P^\delta)\in H_0^1 \times L^2$ is a solution to the problem
\begin{equation*}
-{\rm div}(2\mu(\rho_0^\delta)D(u_0^\delta))+\nabla P_0^\delta+{\rm div}(\nabla d_0^\delta \odot \nabla d_0^\delta)=\sqrt{\rho_0^\delta}g \ {\rm and } \ {\rm div}u_0^\delta=0
\ {\rm in} \ \Omega.
\end{equation*}
Then by the regularity estimate, it is easy to get
\begin{center}
$u_0^\delta \in H_0^1 \cap H^2$ \quad and \quad $u_0^\delta \rightarrow u_0$ in $H^2$ as $\delta \rightarrow 0^+.$
\end{center}
Then, by Proposition \ref{proposition3.4}, there exist a time $T_0 \in (0, T)$ and a unique strong solution
$(\rho^\delta, u^\delta, P^\delta, d^\delta)$ in $[0, T_0]\times \Omega$ to the problem with the initial data
replaced by $(\rho^\delta_0, u^\delta_0, d^\delta_0)$. Note that $(\rho^\delta, u^\delta, P^\delta, d^\delta)$
will satisfies the regularity estimate where $C$ independent of the parameter $\delta$. Hence, let
$\delta \rightarrow 0^+$, it is a simple matter to see $(\rho, u, P, d)$ is a strong solution and have the following
regularity estimate
\begin{equation*}
\begin{aligned}
& \underset{0 \le t \le T_0}{\sup}\left(\|\rho\|_{W^{1,q}}+\|\rho_t\|_{L^q}+\|\sqrt{\rho}u_t\|_{L^2}
+\|u\|_{H^2}+\|P\|_{H^1}+\|d\|_{H^3}+\|\nabla d_t\|_{L^2}^2\right)\\
&\quad +\int_0^{T_0} \left(\|u\|_{W^{2,r}}^2+\|P\|_{W^{1,r}}^2+\|\nabla^4 d\|_{L^2}^2
+\|\nabla^2 d_t\|_{L^2}^2+\|d_{tt}\|_{L^2}^2\right)dt \le C.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation*}
Therefore, we complete the proof of Theorem \ref{Theorem1.1}.
\section{Proof of Theorem \ref{blowupcriterion1}}
\quad In this section, we will give the proof of Theorem \ref{Theorem1.1} by contradiction. More precisely, let $0 < T^* <\infty$ be the maximum time for the existence of strong solution $(\rho, u, P, d)$ to \eqref{1.1}-\eqref{1.4}. Suppose that \eqref{1.7}
were false, that is
\begin{equation}\label{4.1}
M_0 \triangleq \underset{T \rightarrow T^*}{\lim}\left(\|\nabla \rho\|_{L^\infty(0,T;L^q)}
+\|u\|_{L^{s_1}(0,T;L_w^{r_1})}+\|\nabla d\|_{L^{s_2}(0,T;L_w^{r_2})}\right)< \infty.
\end{equation}
Under the condition \eqref{4.1}, one will extend existence time of the strong solution to \eqref{1.1}-\eqref{1.4} beyond $T^*$,
which contradicts with the definition of maximum existence time.
\begin{lemm}\label{lemma4.1}
For any $0\le T < T^*$, it holds that
\begin{equation}\label{4.2}
\underset{0 \le t \le T}{\sup}
\left(\|\rho\|_{L^m}+\|\sqrt{\rho}u\|_{L^2}^2+\|\nabla d\|_{L^2}^2\right)+\int_0^T \int \left(|\nabla d|^2+\left||\nabla d|^2d+\Delta d\right|^2\right)dxds \le C,
\end{equation}
where $1\le m \le \infty$ and in what follows, $C$ denotes generic constants depending only on $\Omega, M_0, T^*$ and the initial data.
\end{lemm}
\begin{proof}
Multiplying $\eqref{1.1}_1$ by $m\rho^{m-1}(1\le m \le \infty)$ and integrating the resulting equation over $\Omega$,
then it is easy to deduce that
\begin{equation*}
\|\rho(t)\|_{L^m}=\|\rho_0\|_{L^m} \quad (1\le m \le \infty).
\end{equation*}
Multiplying $\eqref{1.1}_2$ by $u$ and integrating (by parts) over $\Omega$, it is easy to deduce
\begin{equation}\label{4.3}
\frac{1}{2} \frac{d}{dt}\int \rho |u|^2dx+\frac{1}{C}\int |\nabla u|^2 dx\le -\int (u \cdot \nabla)d \cdot \Delta d \ dx.
\end{equation}
Multiplying $\eqref{1.1}_4$ by $\Delta d+ |\nabla d|^2 d$ and integrating (by parts) over $\Omega$, we obtain
\begin{equation}\label{4.4}
\frac{1}{2} \frac{d}{dt}\int |\nabla d|^2 dx+\int \left||\nabla d|^2 d+\Delta d\right|^2dx
=\int (u\cdot \nabla)d \cdot \Delta d dx+\int(d_t+u\cdot \nabla d)|\nabla d|^2 d \ dx.
\end{equation}
By virtue of $|d|=1,$ we have the fact
\begin{equation}\label{4.5}
(d_t+u\cdot \nabla d)|\nabla d|^2 d=0.
\end{equation}
Substituting \eqref{4.5} into \eqref{4.4}, it arrives at
\begin{equation*}
\frac{1}{2} \frac{d}{dt}\int |\nabla d|^2 dx+\int \left||\nabla d|^2 d+\Delta d\right|^2dx
=\int (u\cdot \nabla)d \cdot \Delta d dx,
\end{equation*}
which, together with \eqref{4.3}, gives
\begin{equation}\label{4.6}
\frac{1}{2} \frac{d}{dt}\int (\rho |u|^2 +|\nabla d|^2 )dx+\frac{1}{C}\int |\nabla u|^2 dx
+\int \left||\nabla d|^2 d+\Delta d\right|^2 dx \le 0.
\end{equation}
Integrating \eqref{4.6} over $(0, t)$ yields
\begin{equation*}
\frac{1}{2}\int (\rho |u|^2+|\nabla d|^2)dx+\int_0^t \int
\left(\frac{1}{C}|\nabla u|^2+\left||\nabla d|^2d+\Delta d\right|^2\right)dxd\tau \le
\frac{1}{2}\int \left(\rho_0 |u_0|^2+|\nabla d_0|^2\right)dx,
\end{equation*}
which completes the proof.
\end{proof}
Now, we give the estimate for $\|\nabla u\|_{L^2}$ and $\|\nabla^2 d\|_{L^2}$.
\begin{lemm}\label{lemma4.2}
Under the condition \eqref{4.1}, it holds that for $0\le T <T^*$,
\begin{equation}\label{4.7}
\begin{aligned}
&\underset{0 \le t \le T}{\sup}\left(\|\nabla u\|_{L^2}^2+\|\nabla d\|_{L^4}^4+\|\nabla^2 d\|_{L^2}^2\right)\\
&\quad +\int_0^T \int \left(|\sqrt{\rho}\dot{u}|^2+|\nabla d|^2 |\nabla^2 d|^2 +|\nabla^3 d|^2+|\nabla d_t|^2\right)dxd\tau \le C.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
\end{lemm}
\begin{proof}
\textrm{Step 1:}
Multiplying $\eqref{1.1}_1$ by $u_t$ and integrating (by parts) over $\Omega$, we have
\begin{equation}\label{4.8}
\begin{aligned}
&\quad \frac{d}{dt}\int \mu(\rho) |D(u)|^2 dx-\frac{d}{dt}\int \nabla d \odot \nabla d : \nabla u dx+\int \rho |\dot{u}|^2 dx\\
&=-\int \rho \dot{u}\cdot (u\cdot \nabla u)+\mu' (u \cdot \nabla \rho)|D(u)|^2+ \nabla d_t \odot \nabla d: \nabla u
+ \nabla d \odot \nabla d_t :\nabla u dx.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
For any $0 \le s <t \le T,$ integrating over $(s, t)$ and applying the Cauchy inequality yield
\begin{equation*}
\begin{aligned}
&\quad \frac{1}{2C}\int |\nabla u|^2 dx- \int \nabla d \odot \nabla d : \nabla u dx+\int_s^t \int \rho |\dot{u}|^2dxd\tau\\
&\le C\int |\nabla u|^2 (s)dx+\int |\nabla d|^2 |\nabla u|(s)dx
+C(\varepsilon, \delta)\int_s^t \int \left(\rho |u|^2 |\nabla u|^2+|u| |\nabla \rho| |\nabla u|^2\right.\\
&\quad \quad \left.+|\nabla d|^2 |\nabla u|^2\right)dxd\tau
+\varepsilon\int_s^t \int \rho |\dot{u}|^2 dxd\tau+\delta \int_s^t \int |\nabla d_t|^2 dxd\tau.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation*}
Choosing $\varepsilon=\frac{1}{4}$, we obtain
\begin{equation}\label{4.9}
\begin{aligned}
&\quad \frac{1}{2C}\int |\nabla u|^2dx- \int \nabla d \odot \nabla d : \nabla u dx+\frac{3}{4}\int_s^t \int \rho |\dot{u}|^2dxd\tau\\
&\le C\int (|\nabla u|^2+|\nabla d|^4)(s)dx
+C(\delta)\int_s^t \int \left(\rho|u|^2 |\nabla u|^2+|u| |\nabla \rho| |\nabla u|^2\right.\\
&\quad \quad
\left.+|\nabla d|^2 |\nabla u|^2\right)dxd\tau+\delta \int_s^t \int |\nabla d_t|^2 dxd\tau.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
Estimate for the term $\int_s^t \int |u| |\nabla \rho| |\nabla u|^2 dxd\tau.$ Indeed, by Cauchy inequality, H\"{o}leder inequality, and Sobolev inequality, we obtain
\begin{equation*}
\begin{aligned}
&\quad \int_s^t \int |u| |\nabla \rho| |\nabla u|^2 dxd\tau
\le C(\varepsilon)\int_s^t \int|u|^2 |\nabla u|^2dxd\tau+\varepsilon \int_s^t \int|\nabla \rho|^2 |\nabla u|^2dxd\tau\\
&\le C(\varepsilon)\int_s^t \int|u|^2 |\nabla u|^2dxd\tau
+\varepsilon \int_s^t \left\||\nabla \rho|^2\right\|_{L^\frac{q}{2}} \left\||\nabla u|^2\right\|_{L^\frac{q}{q-2}}d\tau\\
&\le C(\varepsilon)\int_s^t \int|u|^2 |\nabla u|^2dxd\tau
+\varepsilon \int_s^t \|\nabla u\|_{H^1}^2 d\tau.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation*}
In order to control the term $\int_s^t \|\nabla u\|_{H^1}^2 d\tau$, by virtue of the Lemma \ref{Lemma2.1}, we have
\begin{equation}\label{4.10}
\begin{aligned}
\|u\|_{H^2}+\|P\|_{H^1}
& \le C \|F\|_{L^2}(1+\|\nabla \rho\|_{L^q})^{\frac{q}{q-n}}\\
& \le C \|-\rho u_t -\rho u \cdot \nabla u- {\rm div}(\nabla d \odot \nabla d)\|_{L^2}\\
& \le C(\|\sqrt{\rho}\dot{u}\|_{L^2}+\left\| |\nabla d| |\nabla^2 d|\right\|_{L^2}).
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
Hence we get the estimate
\begin{equation}\label{4.11}
\begin{aligned}
&\quad \int_s^t \int |u| |\nabla \rho| |\nabla u|^2 dxd\tau\\
&\le C(\varepsilon)\int_s^t \int|u|^2 |\nabla u|^2dxd\tau
+\varepsilon \int_s^t (\|\sqrt{\rho}\dot{u}\|_{L^2}^2+\left\| |\nabla d| |\nabla^2 d|\right\|_{L^2}^2)d\tau.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
Substituting \eqref{4.11} into \eqref{4.9} and choosing $\varepsilon=\frac{1}{4}$, it arrives at
\begin{equation}\label{4.12}
\begin{aligned}
&\quad \frac{1}{2C}\int |\nabla u|^2dx- \int \nabla d \odot \nabla d : \nabla u dx+\frac{1}{2}\int_s^t \int \rho |\dot{u}|^2dxd\tau\\
&\le C\int (|\nabla u|^2+|\nabla d|^4)(s)dx
+C(\delta)\int_s^t \int \left(|u|^2 |\nabla u|^2+|\nabla d|^2 |\nabla u|^2\right. \\
&\quad \quad \left.+ |\nabla d|^2 |\nabla^2 d|^2\right)dxd\tau+\delta \int_s^t \int |\nabla d_t|^2 dxd\tau.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
\textrm{Step 2:} Taking $\nabla $ operator to $\eqref{1.1}_4$, then we have
\begin{equation}\label{4.13}
\nabla d_t -\nabla \Delta d=-\nabla (u\cdot \nabla d)+\nabla (|\nabla d|^2 d).
\end{equation}
Multiplying \eqref{4.13} by $4|\nabla d|^2 \nabla d$ and integrating (by parts) over $\Omega$, we obtain
\begin{equation}\label{4.14}
\begin{aligned}
&\quad \frac{d}{dt}\int |\nabla d|^4dx+4\int |\nabla d|^2 |\nabla^2 d|^2dx+2\int |\nabla(|\nabla d|^2)|^2 dx\\
&=2\int_{\partial \Omega} |\nabla d|^2<\nabla (|\nabla d|^2), \nu>d\sigma
+4\int \nabla(|\nabla d|^2 d):|\nabla d|^2 \nabla d \ dx\\
&\quad \quad -4\int \nabla (u \cdot \nabla d):|\nabla d|^2 \nabla d \ dx=\sum_{i=1}^3 {I\!I}_{1i},
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
where $\nu $ is the unite outward normal vector to $\partial \Omega$.
To estimate ${I\!I}_{11}=2\int_{\partial \Omega} |\nabla d|^2<\nabla (|\nabla d|^2), \nu>d\sigma$. Indeed, applying the
Sobolev embedding inequality $W^{1,1}(\Omega)\hookrightarrow L^1(\partial \Omega)$, it is easy to get
\begin{equation}\label{4.15}
\begin{aligned}
{I\!I}_{11}
& \le 4 \int_{\partial \Omega} |\nabla d|^3 |\nabla^2 d| d\sigma
\le C \left\| |\nabla d|^3 |\nabla^2 d| \right\|_{W^{1,1}(\Omega)}\\
& \le C\int ( |\nabla d|^3 |\nabla^2 d|+ |\nabla d|^2 |\nabla^2 d|^2+|\nabla d|^3 |\nabla^3 d|)dx\\
& \le C(\eta)\int (|\nabla d|^2 |\nabla^2 d|^2+|\nabla d|^4+|\nabla d|^6)dx+\eta \int |\nabla^3 d|^2 dx.\\
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
To estimate ${I\!I}_{12}=4\int \nabla(|\nabla d|^2 d):|\nabla d|^2 \nabla d \ dx.$ Indeed, since $|d|=1$, we have
$d \cdot \nabla d=0.$ Then, we get
\begin{equation*}
\nabla(|\nabla d|^2 d):|\nabla d|^2 \nabla d
=(\nabla(|\nabla d|^2)d+|\nabla d|^2 \nabla d):|\nabla d|^2 \nabla d=|\nabla d|^6.
\end{equation*}
Hence, it arrives at
\begin{equation}\label{4.16}
{I\!I}_{12}=4\int \nabla(|\nabla d|^2 d):|\nabla d|^2 \nabla d \ dx=4\int |\nabla d|^6 dx.
\end{equation}
By the Cauchy inequality, we have
\begin{equation}\label{4.17}
\begin{aligned}
{I\!I}_{13}&=-4\int \nabla (u \cdot \nabla d):|\nabla d|^2 \nabla d \ dx\\
&\le \int (|\nabla u| |\nabla d|^4+ |u| |\nabla d|^3 |\nabla^2 d|)dx\\
&\le C\int (|\nabla d|^2 |\nabla u|^2 +|\nabla d|^6 +|u|^2 |\nabla^2 d|^2) dx.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
Substituting \eqref{4.15}-\eqref{4.17} into \eqref{4.14}, choosing $\varepsilon$ small enough, and integrating
over $(s, t)$, it arrives at
\begin{equation}\label{4.18}
\begin{aligned}
&\quad \int |\nabla d|^4 dx+4\int_s^t \int |\nabla d|^2 |\nabla^2 d|^2dx d\tau+2\int_s^t \int |\nabla (|\nabla d|^2)|^2dxd\tau\\
&\le \int |\nabla d|^4(s)dx+C(\eta)\int_s^t \int\left(|\nabla d|^4+|\nabla d|^6+|\nabla d|^2 |\nabla^2 d|^2+|\nabla d|^2 |\nabla u|^2\right.\\
&\quad \quad \left.+ |u|^2 |\nabla^2 d|^2\right)dxd\tau +\eta \int_s^t \int |\nabla^3 d|^2 dxd\tau.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
\textrm{Step 3:}Multiplying \eqref{4.13} by $\nabla \Delta d$, integrating (by parts) over $\Omega$ and applying
Young inequality, we obtain
\begin{equation*}
\begin{aligned}
&\quad \frac{1}{2}\frac{d}{dt}\int |\Delta d|^2dx+\int |\nabla \Delta d|^2dx\\
&\le \int (|\nabla u| |\nabla d|+ |u| |\nabla^2 d| + |\nabla d|^3 + |\nabla d| |\nabla^2 d|)|\nabla \Delta d|dx\\
&\le C(\varepsilon)\int (|\nabla u|^2 |\nabla d|^2+|u|^2 |\nabla^2 d|^2+|\nabla d|^6 +|\nabla d|^2 |\nabla^2 d|^2)dx
+\varepsilon\int |\nabla \Delta d|^2 dx.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation*}
Choosing $\varepsilon=\frac{1}{2}$ and integrating over $(s, t)$, we get
\begin{equation}\label{4.19}
\begin{aligned}
&\quad \int |\Delta d|^2dx+\int_s^t\int |\nabla \Delta d|^2dxd\tau\\
&\le 2\int |\Delta d|^2(s)dx +C\int_s^t\int (|\nabla d|^2 |\nabla^2 d|^2+|\nabla d|^2|\nabla u|^2+|u|^2 |\nabla^2 d|^2+|\nabla d|^6)dxd\tau.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
\textrm{Step 4:}Multiplying \eqref{4.13} by $\nabla d_t$, integrating (by parts) over $\Omega$ and applying
Young inequality, we obtain
\begin{equation*}
\begin{aligned}
&\quad \frac{1}{2}\frac{d}{dt}\int |\Delta d|^2dx+\int | \nabla d_t|^2dx
=\int [\nabla(|\nabla d|^2 d)-\nabla(u\cdot \nabla d)]\cdot \nabla d_t dx\\
&\le C(\varepsilon)\int (|\nabla u|^2 |\nabla d|^2+|u|^2 |\nabla^2 d|^2+|\nabla d|^6 +|\nabla d|^2 |\nabla^2 d|^2)dx
+\varepsilon\int |\nabla d_t|^2 dx.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation*}
Choosing $\varepsilon=\frac{1}{2}$ and integrating over $(s, t)$, we get
\begin{equation}\label{4.20}
\begin{aligned}
&\quad \int |\Delta d|^2dx+\int_s^t\int |\nabla d_t|^2dxd\tau\\
&\le 2\int |\Delta d|^2(s)dx +C\int_s^t\int (|\nabla d|^2 |\nabla^2 d|^2+|\nabla u|^2 |\nabla d|^2+|u|^2 |\nabla^2 d|^2+|\nabla d|^6)dxd\tau.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
Then, choosing $\delta$ small enough and some constant $C_{**}$ suitably large such that
\begin{equation*}
\frac{1}{2C}|\nabla u|^2-\nabla d \odot \nabla d :\nabla u+C_{**} |\nabla d|^4 \ge \frac{1}{4C}(|\nabla u|^2+|\nabla d|^4),
\end{equation*}
then $\eqref{4.12}+\eqref{4.18}\times C_{**}+\eqref{4.19}+\eqref{4.20} $ and choosing $\eta$ and $\delta$ small enough yield
\begin{equation}\label{4.21}
\begin{aligned}
&\quad \int(|\nabla u|^2+|\nabla^2 d|^2+|\nabla d|^4)(t)dx
+\int_s^t\int(\rho |\dot{u}|^2+|\nabla d|^2 |\nabla^2 d|^2+|\nabla(|\nabla d|^2)|^2\left.\right.\\
&\quad \quad +|\nabla^3 d|^2+|\nabla d_t|^2)dxd\tau\\
&\le C+C\int(|\nabla u|^2+|\nabla^2 d|^2+|\nabla d|^4)(s)dx
+C\int_s^t \int(1+|\nabla^2 d|^2+|\nabla d|^4\\
&\quad \quad +|u|^2 |\nabla u|^2+|\nabla d|^2 |\nabla^2 d|^2
+|\nabla d|^2 |\nabla u|^2+|u|^2 |\nabla^2 d|^2+|\nabla d|^6 )dxd\tau.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
Choosing $s=0$, then we obtain
\begin{equation}\label{4.22}
\begin{aligned}
&\quad \int(|\nabla u|^2+|\nabla^2 d|^2+|\nabla d|^4)(t)dx
+\int_0^t\int\left(\rho |\dot{u}|^2+|\nabla d|^2 |\nabla^2 d|^2+|\nabla(|\nabla d|^2)|^2\right.\\
&\quad \quad \left.+|\nabla^3 d|^2+|\nabla d_t|^2\right)dxd\tau\\
&\le C+C\int_0^t \int\left(1+|\nabla^2 d|^2+|\nabla d|^4+|\nabla d|^2 |\nabla^2 d|^2+|u|^2 |\nabla u|^2
+|u|^2 |\nabla^2 d|^2\right.\\
&\quad \quad \left.+|\nabla d|^2 |\nabla u|^2+|\nabla d|^6 \right)dxd\tau\\
&=C+C\int_0^t \int(1+|\nabla^2 d|^2+|\nabla d|^4)dxd\tau+\sum_{i=1}^5 {I\!I}_{2i}.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
Applying Lemma \ref{lemma2.3} to ${I\!I}_{2i}(1\le i\le 5)$ repeatedly, then it arrives at
\begin{equation*}
\begin{aligned}
{I\!I}_{21}&\le \varepsilon\|\nabla^2 d\|_{H^1}^2
+C(\varepsilon)\|\nabla d\|_{L^{r_2}_w}^{\frac{2r_2}{r_2-3}}\|\nabla^2 d\|_{L^2}^2,\\
{I\!I}_{22}&\le \varepsilon\int_0^t \|\nabla u\|_{H^1}^2 d\tau
+C(\varepsilon)\int_0^t \|u\|_{L_w^{r_1}}^\frac{2 r_1}{r_1-3}\|\nabla u\|_{L^2}^2 d\tau\\
&\le \varepsilon\int_0^t (\|\sqrt{\rho}\dot{u}\|_{L^2}^2+\left\| |\nabla d| |\nabla^2 d|\right\|_{L^2}^2) d\tau
+C(\varepsilon)\int_0^t \|u\|_{L_w^{r_1}}^\frac{2 r_1}{r_1-3}\|\nabla u\|_{L^2}^2 d\tau,\\
&\le \varepsilon\int_0^t (\|\sqrt{\rho}\dot{u}\|_{L^2}^2+\|\nabla^2 d\|_{H^1}^2) d\tau
+C(\varepsilon)\int_0^t \left(\|\nabla d\|_{L^{r_2}_w}^{\frac{2r_2}{r_2-3}}\|\nabla^2 d\|_{L^2}^2
+\|u\|_{L_w^{r_1}}^\frac{2 r_1}{r_1-3}\|\nabla u\|_{L^2}^2 \right)d\tau,\\
{I\!I}_{23}&\le \varepsilon\int_0^t \|\nabla^2 d\|_{H^1}^2 d\tau
+C(\varepsilon)\int_0^t \|u\|_{L_w^{r_1}}^\frac{2 r_1}{r_1-3}\|\nabla^2 d\|_{L^2}^2 d\tau,\\
{I\!I}_{24}&\le \varepsilon\int_0^t \|\nabla u\|_{H^1}^2 d\tau
+C(\varepsilon)\int_0^t \|\nabla d\|_{L_w^{r_2}}^\frac{2 r_2}{r_2-3}\|\nabla u\|_{L^2}^2 d\tau\\
&\le \varepsilon\int_0^t (\|\sqrt{\rho}\dot{u}\|_{L^2}^2+\|\nabla^2 d\|_{H^1}^2) d\tau
+C(\varepsilon)\int_0^t \|\nabla d\|_{L_w^{r_2}}^\frac{2 r_2}{r_2-3}
\left(\|\nabla^2 d\|_{L^2}^2+\|\nabla u\|_{L^2}^2\right)d\tau,\\
{I\!I}_{25}&\le \varepsilon\int_0^t \||\nabla d|^2\|_{H^1}^2 d\tau
+C(\varepsilon)\int_0^t \|\nabla d\|_{L_w^{r_2}}^\frac{2 r_2}{r_2-3}\||\nabla d|^2\|_{L^2}^2 d\tau\\
&\le \varepsilon\int_0^t \left(\|\nabla d\|_{L^4}^4+\|\nabla(|\nabla d|^2)\|_{L^2}^2\right) d\tau
+C(\varepsilon)\int_0^t \|\nabla d\|_{L_w^{r_2}}^\frac{2 r_2}{r_2-3}\|\nabla d\|_{L^4}^4 d\tau.\\
\end{aligned}
\end{equation*}
Substituting ${I\!I}_{2i}(1\le i \le 5)$ into \eqref{4.22} and choosing $\varepsilon$ small enough, then it is easy to deduce that
\begin{equation*}
\begin{aligned}
&\quad \int(|\nabla u|^2+|\nabla^2 d|^2+|\nabla d|^4)(t)dx
+\int_0^t\int\left(\rho |\dot{u}|^2+|\nabla d|^2 |\nabla^2 d|^2+|\nabla(|\nabla d|^2)|^2\right.\\
&\quad \quad \left.+|\nabla^3 d|^2+|\nabla d_t|^2\right)dxd\tau\\
&\le C+C\int_0^t \left(1+\|u\|_{L_w^{r_1}}^\frac{2r_1}{r_1-3}+\|\nabla d\|_{L_w^{r_2}}^\frac{2r_2}{r_2-3}\right)
\left(1+\|\nabla u\|_{L^2}^2+\|\nabla^2 d\|_{L^2}^2+\|\nabla d\|_{L^4}^4\right)d\tau,
\end{aligned}
\end{equation*}
which, applying \eqref{4.1} and Gr\"{o}nwall inequality, completes the proof.
\end{proof}
As a corollary of Lemma \ref{lemma4.2}, it is a direct result from $\eqref{1.1}_4$. More precisely,
\begin{coro}\label{lemma4.3}
Under the condition \eqref{4.1}, it holds that for $0 \le T<T^*$,
\begin{equation}\label{4.23}
\underset{0 \le t \le T}{\sup} \|d_t\|_{L^2}+\int_0^T \| u \|_{H^2}^2 d\tau \le C.
\end{equation}
\end{coro}
Now, we give the second important estimate$-$norm of $\|\sqrt{\rho}u_t\|_{L^2}$ and $\|\nabla^3 d\|_{L^2}$.
\begin{lemm}\label{lemma4.4}
Under the condition \eqref{4.1}, it holds that for $0 \le T<T^*$,
\begin{equation}\label{4.24}
\underset{0 \le t \le T}{\sup}\left(\|\sqrt{\rho}u_t\|_{L^2}^2+\|\nabla^3 d\|_{L^2}^2\right)
+\int_0^t (\|\nabla u_t\|_{L^2}^2+\|\nabla^2 d_t\|_{L^2}^2) d\tau \le C.
\end{equation}
\end{lemm}
\begin{proof}
\textrm{Step 1:} Differentiating $\eqref{1.1}_2$ with respect to $t$, we get
\begin{equation}\label{4.25}
\begin{aligned}
&\quad \rho u_{tt}+\rho u\cdot \nabla u_t-{\rm div}(2\mu(\rho)D(u_t))+\nabla P_t\\
&=-\rho_t u_t-\rho_t u\cdot \nabla u-\rho u_t \cdot \nabla u+{\rm div}(2\mu' \rho_t D(u))
-{\rm div}(\nabla d_t \odot \nabla d+\nabla d \odot \nabla d_t).
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
Multiplying \eqref{4.25} by $u_t$ and integrating (by parts) over $\Omega$, it arrives at
\begin{equation}\label{4.26}
\begin{aligned}
&\quad \frac{1}{2}\frac{d}{dt}\int \rho |u_t|^2dx+\frac{1}{C}\int |\nabla u_t|^2 dx\\
&\le C \int \left(\rho |u| |u_t| |\nabla u_t|+\rho |u| |\nabla u|^2 |u_t|+\rho |u|^2 |\nabla^2 u| |u_t|+\rho |u|^2 |\nabla u| |\nabla u_t|\right.\\
&\quad \quad \quad \left.+\rho |u_t|^2 |\nabla u|+|\nabla d| |\nabla d_t| |\nabla u_t|
+|u| |\nabla \rho| |\nabla u| |\nabla u_t|\right)dx=\sum_{i=1}^{7}{I\!I}_{3i}.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
Using \eqref{4.7}, H\"{o}lder, interpolation, Sobolev, and Young inequalities repeatedly, we get
\begin{equation*}
\begin{aligned}
{I\!I}_{31}&\le \|\sqrt{\rho}\|_{L^\infty} \|u\|_{L^6} \|\sqrt{\rho}u_t\|_{L^3} \|\nabla u_t\|_{L^2}
\le C \|\nabla u\|_{L^2} \|\sqrt{\rho}u_t\|_{L^2}^\frac{1}{2} \|\sqrt{\rho}u_t\|_{L^6}^\frac{1}{2}\|\nabla u_t\|_{L^2}\\
&\le C \|\sqrt{\rho}u_t\|_{L^2}^\frac{1}{2} \|\nabla u_t\|_{L^2}^\frac{3}{2}
\le C(\varepsilon) \|\sqrt{\rho}u_t\|_{L^2}^2+\varepsilon \|\nabla u_t\|_{L^2}^2,\\
{I\!I}_{32}&\le \|\rho \|_{L^\infty} \|u\|_{L^6} \|\nabla u\|_{L^3}^2 \| u_t\|_{L^6}
\le C \|\nabla u\|_{L^2}^2\|\nabla u\|_{L^6}\|\nabla u_t\|_{L^2}\\
&\le C(\varepsilon) \|\nabla u\|_{H^1}^2+\varepsilon \|\nabla u_t\|_{L^2}^2,\\
{I\!I}_{33}&\le \|\rho\|_{L^\infty} \|u\|_{L^6} \|\nabla^2 u\|_{L^2} \| u_t\|_{L^6}
\le C\|\nabla u\|_{L^2} \|\nabla^2 u\|_{L^2} \|\nabla u_t\|_{L^2}\\
&\le C(\varepsilon) \|\nabla^2 u\|_{L^2}^2+\varepsilon \|\nabla u_t\|_{L^2}^2,\\
\end{aligned}
\end{equation*}
\begin{equation*}
\begin{aligned}
{I\!I}_{34}&\le \|\rho\|_{L^\infty} \|u\|_{L^6}^2 \|\nabla u\|_{L^6} \|\nabla u_t\|_{L^2}
\le C\|\nabla u\|_{L^2}^2 \|\nabla u\|_{H^1} \|\nabla u_t\|_{L^2}\\
&\le C(\varepsilon) \|\nabla u\|_{H^1}^2+\varepsilon \|\nabla u_t\|_{L^2}^2,\\
{I\!I}_{35}&\le \|\sqrt{\rho}\|_{L^\infty} \|u_t\|_{L^6} \|\sqrt{\rho}u_t\|_{L^3} \|\nabla u\|_{L^2}
\le C \|\nabla u_t\|_{L^2} \|\sqrt{\rho}u_t\|_{L^2}^\frac{1}{2}\|\sqrt{\rho}u_t\|_{L^6}^\frac{1}{2}\\
&\le C \|\sqrt{\rho}u_t\|_{L^2}^\frac{1}{2} \|\nabla u_t\|_{L^2}^\frac{3}{2}
\le C(\varepsilon) \|\sqrt{\rho}u_t\|_{L^2}^2+\varepsilon \|\nabla u_t\|_{L^2}^2,\\
{I\!I}_{36}&\le \|\nabla d\|_{L^6} \|\nabla d_t\|_{L^3} \|\nabla u_t\|_{L^2}
\le C\|\nabla d\|_{H^1} \|\nabla d_t\|_{L^2}^\frac{1}{2} \|\nabla d_t\|_{L^6}^\frac{1}{2}\|\nabla u_t\|_{L^2}\\
&\le C(\varepsilon,\eta)\|\nabla d_t\|_{L^2}^2+\eta\|\nabla d_t\|_{H^1}^2+\varepsilon\|\nabla u_t\|_{L^2}^2.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation*}
Substituting ${I\!I}_{3i}(1\le i\le 6)$ into \eqref{4.26}, then we have
\begin{equation}\label{4.27}
\begin{aligned}
&\quad \frac{1}{2} \frac{d}{dt}\int \rho |u_t|^2dx+\frac{1}{C}\int |\nabla u_t|^2 dx\\
&\le C(\varepsilon)(\|\sqrt{\rho}u_t\|_{L^2}^2+\|\nabla u\|_{H^1}^2)
+C(\varepsilon,\eta)\|\nabla d_t\|_{L^2}^2+\eta\|\nabla d_t\|_{H^1}^2+\varepsilon\|\nabla u_t\|_{L^2}^2\\
&\quad +C\int |u| |\nabla \rho| |\nabla u| |\nabla u_t| dx.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
Using \eqref{4.10},\eqref{4.7} and interpolation inequality, it arrives at
\begin{equation*}
\begin{aligned}
\|u\|_{H^2}+\|P\|_{H^1}
&\le C(\|\sqrt{\rho}u_t\|_{L^2}+\| |u| |\nabla u|\|_{L^2}+\| |\nabla d| |\nabla^2 d| \|_{L^2}\\
&\le C(\|\sqrt{\rho}u_t\|_{L^2}+\|u\|_{L^6}\|\nabla u\|_{L^3}+\|\nabla d\|_{L^\infty}\|\nabla^2 d \|_{L^2})\\
&\le C(\|\sqrt{\rho}u_t\|_{L^2}+\|\nabla u\|_{L^2}^{\frac{1}{2}}\|\nabla u\|_{H^1}^{\frac{1}{2}}
+\|\nabla d\|_{H^2})\\
&\le C(\|\sqrt{\rho}u_t\|_{L^2}+\|\nabla d\|_{H^2}+1)+\frac{1}{2}\|\nabla u\|_{H^1},\\
\end{aligned}
\end{equation*}
which implies
\begin{equation}\label{4.28}
\|u\|_{H^2}+\|P\|_{H^1} \le C(\|\sqrt{\rho}u_t\|_{L^2}+\|\nabla d\|_{H^2}+1).
\end{equation}
Combining \eqref{4.27} with \eqref{4.28}, it arrives at
\begin{equation}\label{4.29}
\begin{aligned}
&\quad \frac{1}{2}\frac{d}{dt}\int \rho |u_t|^2dx+\frac{1}{C}\int |\nabla u_t|^2 dx\\
&\le C(\varepsilon)(\|\sqrt{\rho}u_t\|_{L^2}^2+\|\nabla^3 d\|_{L^2}^2+1)
+C(\varepsilon,\eta)\|\nabla d_t\|_{L^2}^2+\eta\|\nabla d_t\|_{H^1}^2+\varepsilon\|\nabla u_t\|_{L^2}^2\\
&\quad +C\int |u| |\nabla \rho| |\nabla u| |\nabla u_t| dx.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
To estimate the term $\int |u| |\nabla \rho| |\nabla u| |\nabla u_t| dx.$ Indeed, by using \eqref{4.1}, H\"{o}lder,
Gagliardo-Nirenberg and Young inequalities, we obtain
\begin{equation}\label{4.30}
\begin{aligned}
\int |u| |\nabla \rho| |\nabla u| |\nabla u_t| dx
& \le \|u\|_{L^6} \|\nabla \rho\|_{L^q} \|\nabla u\|_{L^\frac{3q}{q-3}} \|\nabla u_t\|_{L^2}\\
& \le C\|\nabla u\|_{L^2} \|\nabla \rho\|_{L^q}
\|\nabla u\|_{L^2}^{\frac{2q-6}{3q}} \|\nabla u\|_{L^\infty}^{\frac{q+6}{3q}} \|\nabla u_t\|_{L^2}\\
&\le C\|\nabla u\|_{W^{1,r}}^{\frac{q+6}{3q}} \|\nabla u_t\|_{L^2}.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
By Lemma \ref{Lemma2.1}, it is easy to deduce that
\begin{equation}\label{4.31}
\|u\|_{W^{2,r}}+\|P\|_{W^{1,r}} \le C(1+\|\nabla u_t\|_{L^2}+\|\nabla^3 d\|_{L^2}^2).
\end{equation}
By Young inequality, Combining \eqref{4.30} with \eqref{4.31} yields
\begin{equation}\label{4.32}
\begin{aligned}
\int |u| |\nabla \rho| |\nabla u| |\nabla u_t| dx
&\le C(1+\|\nabla u_t\|_{L^2}+\|\nabla^3 d\|_{L^2}^2)^{\frac{q+6}{3q}} \|\nabla u_t\|_{L^2}\\
&\le C(\varepsilon)(1+\|\nabla^3 d\|_{L^2}^4)+\varepsilon\|\nabla u_t\|_{L^2}^2.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
Substituting \eqref{4.32} into \eqref{4.29} and choosing $\varepsilon$ small enough, we obtain
\begin{equation*}
\begin{aligned}
&\quad \frac{1}{2}\frac{d}{dt}\int \rho |u_t|^2dx+\frac{1}{C}\int |\nabla u_t|^2 dx\\
&\le C(1+\|\sqrt{\rho}u_t\|_{L^2}^2+\|\nabla^3 d\|_{L^2}^2+\|\nabla^3 d\|_{L^2}^4)
+C(\eta)\|\nabla d_t\|_{L^2}^2+\eta\|\nabla d_t\|_{H^1}^2.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation*}
Thanks to the compatibility condition and \eqref{4.7}, we get
\begin{equation}\label{4.33}
\begin{aligned}
&\quad \|\sqrt{\rho}u_t\|_{L^2}^2+\int_0^t \|\nabla u_t\|_{L^2}^2 d\tau\\
&\le C(\eta)+C\int_0^t(1+\|\sqrt{\rho}u_t\|_{L^2}^2+\|\nabla^3 d\|_{L^2}^2+\|\nabla^3 d\|_{L^2}^4)d\tau
+\eta\int_0^t \|\nabla^2 d_t\|_{L^2}^2 d\tau.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
\textrm{Step 2:} In order to the control the term $\int_0^t \|\nabla^3 d\|_{L^2}^4 d\tau$, we should derive some estimate for
$\|\nabla^3 d\|_{L^2}^2$. More precisely, multiplying \eqref{4.13} by $\nabla \Delta d_t$ and integrating (by parts) over
$\Omega$, we obtain
\begin{equation}\label{4.34}
\begin{aligned}
&\quad \frac{1}{2}\frac{d}{dt}\int |\nabla \Delta d|^2 dx+\int |\Delta d_t|^2 dx\\
&= \frac{d}{dt}\int \nabla (u \cdot \nabla d-|\nabla d|^2 d)\cdot \nabla \Delta d \ dx
-\int \frac{\partial}{\partial t}\left[\nabla(u\cdot \nabla d-|\nabla d|^2 d)\right] \cdot \nabla \Delta d \ dx.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
To give the second term of the left hand side of \eqref{4.34} first. Indeed, it is easy to deduce that
\begin{equation}\label{4.35}
\begin{aligned}
&\quad -\int \frac{\partial}{\partial t}\left[\nabla(u\cdot \nabla d-|\nabla d|^2 d)\right] \cdot \nabla \Delta d \ dx\\
&\le C\int\left(|\nabla u_t| |\nabla d|+|\nabla u| |\nabla d_t|+|u_t| |\nabla^2 d|
+|u| |\nabla^2 d_t|+|\nabla d_t| |\nabla^2 d|+|\nabla d| |\nabla^2 d_t|\right.\\
&\quad \quad \quad \quad \left.+|\nabla d| |\nabla^2 d||d_t|+|\nabla d|^2 |\nabla d_t|\right)|\nabla \Delta d|dx
=\sum_{i=1}^8 {I\!I}_{4i}.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
By using \eqref{4.7}, \eqref{4.10}, H\"{o}lder, Sobolev and Young inequalities repeatedly, we obtain
\begin{equation*}
\begin{aligned}
{I\!I}_{41}&\le C\|\nabla d\|_{L^\infty} \|\nabla u_t\|_{L^2} \|\nabla \Delta d\|_{L^2}
\le C\|\nabla d\|_{H^2} \|\nabla^3 d\|_{L^2}\|\nabla u_t\|_{L^2} \\
&\le C(\delta)(\|\nabla^3 d\|_{L^2}^2+1)\|\nabla^3 d\|_{L^2}^2+\delta \|\nabla u_t\|_{L^2}^2,\\
{I\!I}_{42}&\le C\|\nabla u\|_{L^3}\|\nabla d_t\|_{L^6}\|\nabla \Delta d\|_{L^2}
\le C\|\nabla u\|_{H^1}\|\nabla^3 d\|_{L^2}\|\nabla d_t\|_{H^1}\\
&\le C(\varepsilon)\|\nabla u\|_{H^1}^2\|\nabla^3 d\|_{L^2}^2+\varepsilon\|\nabla d_t\|_{H^1}^2\\
&\le C(\varepsilon)(\|\sqrt{\rho}u_t\|_{L^2}^2+\|\nabla^3 d\|_{L^2}^2+1)\|\nabla^3 d\|_{L^2}^2
+\varepsilon\|\nabla d_t\|_{H^1}^2,\\
{I\!I}_{43}&\le \|u_t\|_{L^6} \|\nabla^2 d\|_{L^3}\|\nabla \Delta d\|_{L^2}
\le \|\nabla u_t\|_{L^2} \|\nabla^2 d\|_{H^1}\|\nabla^3 d\|_{L^2}\\
&\le C(\delta)(1+\|\nabla^3 d\|_{L^2}^2)\|\nabla^3 d\|_{L^2}^2+\delta \|\nabla u_t\|_{L^2}^2,\\
\end{aligned}
\end{equation*}
\begin{equation*}
\begin{aligned}
{I\!I}_{44}&\le C\|u\|_{L^\infty} \|\nabla^2 d_t\|_{L^2}\|\nabla \Delta d\|_{L^2}
\le C\|u\|_{H^2} \|\nabla^3 d\|_{L^2} \|\nabla^2 d_t\|_{L^2}\\
&\le (\varepsilon)(\|\sqrt{\rho}u_t\|_{L^2}^2+\|\nabla^3 d\|_{L^2}^2+1)\|\nabla^3 d\|_{L^2}^2
+\varepsilon\|\nabla^2 d_t\|_{L^2}^2,\\
{I\!I}_{45}&\le C\|\nabla d_t\|_{L^6} \|\nabla^2 d\|_{L^3}\|\nabla \Delta d\|_{L^2}
\le C\|\nabla d_t\|_{H^1} \|\nabla^2 d\|_{H^1}\|\nabla^3 d\|_{L^2}\\
&\le C(\varepsilon)(1+\|\nabla^3 d\|_{L^2}^2)\|\nabla^3 d\|_{L^2}^2+\varepsilon \|\nabla d_t\|_{H^1}^2,\\
{I\!I}_{46}&\le C\|\nabla d\|_{L^6} \|\nabla^2 d\|_{L^6} \| d_t\|_{L^6}\|\nabla \Delta d\|_{L^2}
\le C\|\nabla d\|_{H^1} \|\nabla^2 d\|_{H^1}\| d_t\|_{H^1}\|\nabla^3 d\|_{L^2}\\
&\le C(\varepsilon)(1+\|\nabla^3 d\|_{L^2}^2)\|\nabla^3 d\|_{L^2}^2+\varepsilon( \|\nabla d_t\|_{L^2}^2+1),\\
{I\!I}_{47}&\le C\|\nabla d\|_{L^\infty} \|\nabla^2 d_t\|_{L^2}\|\nabla \Delta d\|_{L^2}
\le C\|\nabla d\|_{H^2} \|\nabla^3 d\|_{L^2} \|\nabla^2 d_t\|_{L^2}\\
&\le C(\varepsilon)(1+\|\nabla^3 d\|_{L^2}^2)\|\nabla^3 d\|_{L^2}^2+\varepsilon \|\nabla^2 d_t\|_{L^2}^2,\\
{I\!I}_{48}&\le C\|\nabla d\|_{L^6}^2 \|\nabla d_t\|_{L^6}\|\nabla \Delta d\|_{L^2}
\le C\|\nabla d\|_{H^1}^2 \| \nabla d_t\|_{H^1}\|\nabla^3 d\|_{L^2}\\
&\le C(\varepsilon)\|\nabla^3 d\|_{L^2}^2+\varepsilon \|\nabla d_t\|_{H^1}^2.\\
\end{aligned}
\end{equation*}
Substituting ${I\!I}_{4i}(1\le i \le 8)$ into \eqref{4.35}, then we obtain
\begin{equation}\label{4.36}
\begin{aligned}
&\quad -\int \frac{\partial}{\partial t}\left[\nabla(u\cdot \nabla d-|\nabla d|^2 d)\right] \cdot \nabla \Delta d \ dx\\
&\le C(\varepsilon, \delta)(1+\|\sqrt{\rho}u_t\|_{L^2}^2+\|\nabla^3 d\|_{L^2}^2)\|\nabla^3 d\|_{L^2}^2
+\varepsilon \|\nabla d_t\|_{H^1}^2+\delta \|\nabla u_t\|_{L^2}^2.\\
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
Substituting \eqref{4.36} into \eqref{4.34} and integrating the resulting inequality over $(0,t)$, it arrives at
\begin{equation*}
\begin{aligned}
&\quad \frac{1}{2}\int |\nabla^3 d|^2 dx+\int_0^t \int |\nabla^2 d_t|^2 dxd\tau\\
&\le C +C(\varepsilon, \delta)\int_0^t(1+\|\sqrt{\rho}u_t\|_{L^2}^2+\|\nabla^3 d\|_{L^2}^2)\|\nabla^3 d\|_{L^2}^2d\tau
+\varepsilon \int_0^t\|\nabla^2 d_t\|_{L^2}^2d\tau \\
&\quad \quad +\delta \int_0^t \|\nabla u_t\|_{L^2}^2 d\tau
+C\int(|\nabla u| |\nabla d|+|u| |\nabla^2 d|+|\nabla d| |\nabla^2 d|+|\nabla d|^3)|\nabla \Delta d|dx.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation*}
Choosing $\varepsilon=\frac{1}{2}$, we obtain
\begin{equation}\label{4.37}
\begin{aligned}
&\quad \int |\nabla^3 d|^2 dx+\int_0^t \int |\nabla^2 d_t|^2 dxd\tau\\
&\le C +C(\delta)\int_0^t(1+\|\sqrt{\rho}u_t\|_{L^2}^2+\|\nabla^3 d\|_{L^2}^2)\|\nabla^3 d\|_{L^2}^2d\tau
+\delta \int_0^t \|\nabla u_t\|_{L^2}^2 d\tau\\
&\quad \quad +C\int(|\nabla u| |\nabla d|+|u| |\nabla^2 d|+|\nabla d| |\nabla^2 d|+|\nabla d|^3)|\nabla \Delta d|dx\\
&= C +C(\delta)\int_0^t(1+\|\sqrt{\rho}u_t\|_{L^2}^2+\|\nabla^3 d\|_{L^2}^2)\|\nabla^3 d\|_{L^2}^2d\tau
+\delta \int_0^t \|\nabla u_t\|_{L^2}^2 d\tau+\sum_{i=1}^4 {I\!I}_{5i}.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
By using the H\"{o}lder, Gagliardo-Nirenberg and Young inequalities repeatedly, we get
\begin{equation*}
\begin{aligned}
{I\!I}_{51} &\le C\|\nabla d\|_{L^\infty} \|\nabla u\|_{L^2} \|\nabla \Delta d\|_{L^2}
\le C\|\nabla d\|_{L^2}^\frac{1}{4} \|\nabla d\|_{H^2}^\frac{3}{4}\|\nabla u\|_{L^2} \|\nabla \Delta d\|_{L^2}\\
&\le C(1+\|\nabla^3 d\|_{L^2})^\frac{3}{4} \|\nabla^3 d\|_{L^2}
\le C(\varepsilon)+\varepsilon\|\nabla^3 d\|_{L^2}^2,\\
{I\!I}_{52} &\le C\|u\|_{L^6} \|\nabla^2 d\|_{L^3} \|\nabla \Delta d\|_{L^2}
\le C\|\nabla u\|_{L^2} \|\nabla^2 d\|_{L^2}^\frac{1}{2} \|\nabla^2 d\|_{H^1}^\frac{1}{2}\|\nabla \Delta d\|_{L^2}\\
&\le C(1+\|\nabla^3 d\|_{L^2})^\frac{1}{2} \|\nabla^3 d\|_{L^2}
\le C(\varepsilon)+\varepsilon\|\nabla^3 d\|_{L^2}^2,\\
\end{aligned}
\end{equation*}
\begin{equation*}
\begin{aligned}
{I\!I}_{53} &\le C\|\nabla d\|_{L^6} \|\nabla^2 d\|_{L^3} \|\nabla \Delta d\|_{L^2}
\le C\|\nabla d\|_{H^1} \|\nabla^2 d\|_{L^2}^\frac{1}{2} \|\nabla^2 d\|_{H^1}^\frac{1}{2}\|\nabla \Delta d\|_{L^2}\\
&\le C(1+\|\nabla^3 d\|_{L^2})^\frac{1}{2} \|\nabla^3 d\|_{L^2}
\le C(\varepsilon)+\varepsilon\|\nabla^3 d\|_{L^2}^2,\\
{I\!I}_{54} &\le C\|\nabla d\|_{L^6}^3 \|\nabla \Delta d\|_{L^2}
\le C\|\nabla d\|_{H^1}^3 \|\nabla^3 d\|_{L^2}
\le C(\varepsilon)+\varepsilon\|\nabla^3 d\|_{L^2}^2.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation*}
Substituting ${I\!I}_{5i}(1 \le i \le 4)$ into \eqref{4.37} and choosing $\varepsilon$ small enough, it arrives at
\begin{equation}\label{4.38}
\begin{aligned}
&\quad \|\nabla^3 d\|_{L^2}^2+\int_0^t \|\nabla^2 d_t\|_{L^2}^2d\tau\\
&\le C +C(\delta)\int_0^t(1+\|\sqrt{\rho}u_t\|_{L^2}^2+\|\nabla^3 d\|_{L^2}^2)\|\nabla^3 d\|_{L^2}^2d\tau
+\delta \int_0^t \|\nabla u_t\|_{L^2}^2 d\tau.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
Adding \eqref{4.38} to \eqref{4.33} and choosing $\delta$ and $\eta$ suitably small, we obtain
\begin{equation*}
\begin{aligned}
&\quad (\|\sqrt{\rho}u_t\|_{L^2}^2+\|\nabla^3 d\|_{L^2}^2)+\int_0^t (\|\nabla u_t\|_{L^2}^2+\|\nabla^2 d_t\|_{L^2}^2) d\tau\\
&\le C+C\int_0^t(1+\|\sqrt{\rho}u_t\|_{L^2}^2+\|\nabla^3 d\|_{L^2}^2)(1+\|\nabla^3 d\|_{L^2}^2)d\tau,
\end{aligned}
\end{equation*}
which, together with Gr\"{o}nwall inequality and \eqref{4.7}, completes the proof.
\end{proof}
Finally, we derive the high order estimate for the strong solution $(\rho, u, P, d)$.
\begin{lemm}\label{lemma4.5}
Under the condition \eqref{4.1}, it holds that for $0 \le T<T^*$,
\begin{equation}\label{4.39}
\begin{aligned}
&\underset{0 \le t \le T}{\sup}(\|\rho_t\|_{L^q}+\|u\|_{H^2}+\|P\|_{H^1}+\|\nabla d_t\|_{L^2})\\
&\quad +\int_0^T \left(\|u\|_{W^{2,r}}^2+\|P\|_{W^{1,r}}^2+\|d_{tt}\|_{L^2}^2+\|\nabla^4 d\|_{L^2}^2\right)dt\le C.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
\end{lemm}
\begin{proof}
By \eqref{4.28} and \eqref{4.31}, it is easy to deduce
\begin{equation}\label{4.40}
\|u\|_{H^2}+\|P\|_{H^1}+\int_0^T \left(\|u\|_{W^{2,r}}^2+\|P\|_{W^{1,r}}^2\right)dt\le C,
\end{equation}
which, together with $\eqref{1.1}_1$, yields
\begin{equation}\label{4.41}
\|\rho_t\|_{L^q}\le \|u\|_{L^\infty}\|\nabla \rho\|_{L^q}\le C\|u\|_{H^2}\|\nabla \rho\|_{L^q} \le C.
\end{equation}
By \eqref{4.13}, \eqref{4.25}, \eqref{4.40} and Sobolev inequality, we obtain
\begin{equation}\label{4.42}
\begin{aligned}
&\quad \|\nabla d_t\|_{L^2}
=\|\nabla \Delta d+\nabla (|\nabla d|^2 d-u \cdot \nabla d)\|_{L^2}\\
& \le C(\|\nabla^3 d\|_{L^2}+\||\nabla u| |\nabla d|\|_{L^2}+\||u| |\nabla^2 d|\|_{L^2}
+\|\nabla d\|_{L^6}^3+\||\nabla d| |\nabla^2 d|\|_{L^2})\\
& \le C(\|\nabla^3 d\|_{L^2}+ \|\nabla u\|_{L^2}\|\nabla d\|_{H^2}+\|u\|_{H^2}\|\nabla^2 d\|_{L^2}
+\|\nabla d\|_{H^1}^3+\|\nabla d\|_{H^2}\|\nabla^2 d\|_{L^2})\\
&\le C.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
Differentiating $\eqref{1.1}_4$ with respect to $t$, it arrives at
\begin{equation}\label{4.43}
d_{tt}-\Delta d_t=(|\nabla d|^2 d-u \cdot \nabla d)_t.
\end{equation}
Taking $L^2$ estimate to \eqref{4.43}, by virtue of \eqref{4.24} and \eqref{4.40}, we obtain
\begin{equation}\label{4.44}
\begin{aligned}
&\quad \int_0^T \|d_{tt}\|_{L^2} dt\\
&\le C\int_0^T(\|\Delta d_t\|_{L^2}+\| |\nabla d_t| |\nabla d| \|_{L^2}+ \| |\nabla d|^2 |d_t|\|_{L^2}
+\| |u_t| |\nabla d|\|_{L^2}+\| |u| |\nabla d_t|\|_{L^2})dt\\
& \le C\int_0^T\left(\|\nabla^2 d_t\|_{L^2}+\|\nabla d_t\|_{L^2}\|\nabla d\|_{H^2}+\|d_t\|_{L^2}\|\nabla d\|_{H^2}^2
+\|\nabla u_t\|_{L^2}\|\nabla d\|_{H^1}\right.\\
& \quad \quad \quad \quad \left.+\|u\|_{H^2}\|\nabla d_t\|_{L^2}\right)dt\\
& \le C\int_0^T(\|\nabla^2 d_t\|_{L^2}+\|\nabla u_t\|_{L^2}+1)dt\le C.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
Taking $\nabla $ operator to $\eqref{1.1}_1$, we get
\begin{equation}\label{4.45}
-\nabla^2 \Delta d=\nabla^2(|\nabla d|^2 d- u\cdot \nabla d -d_t).
\end{equation}
Applying $H^4$ estimate to $d$ with boundary $\left.\frac{\partial d}{\partial \nu}\right|_{\partial \Omega}=0$ and \eqref{4.45}
we get
\begin{equation}\label{4.46}
\begin{aligned}
&\quad \|\nabla^4 d\|_{L^2} \le C(\|\nabla^2 \Delta d\|_{L^2}+\|\nabla^2 d\|_{H^1})\\
&\le C (\|\nabla^2(|\nabla d|^2 d- u\cdot \nabla d -d_t)\|_{L^2}+1)\\
&\le C \left(\|\nabla^2 d_t|\|_{L^2}+\||\nabla^2 d|^2\|_{L^2}+\||\nabla d|^2 |\nabla^2 d|\|_{L^2}
+\| |\nabla^2 u| |\nabla d|\|_{L^2}\right.\\
&\quad \quad \left. +\||\nabla u| |\nabla^2 d|\|_{L^2}+\| |u| |\nabla^3 d|\|_{L^2}\right)\\
&\le C\left(\|\nabla^2 d_t|\|_{L^2}+\|\nabla^2 d\|_{L^4}^2+\|\nabla d\|_{H^2}^2 \|\nabla^2 d\|_{L^2}
+\|\nabla d\|_{H^2}\|\nabla^2 u\|_{L^2}\right.\\
&\quad \quad \left.+\|\nabla u\|_{H^1}\|\nabla^2 d\|_{H^1}+\|u\|_{H^2}\|\nabla^3 d\|_{L^2}\right)\\
&\le C(\|\nabla^2 d_t|\|_{L^2}+1),
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
which means
\begin{equation*}
\int_0^T \|\nabla^4 d\|_{L^2}^2 dt \le C,
\end{equation*}
which completes the proof.
\end{proof}
After having the Lemmas \ref{lemma4.1}-\ref{lemma4.5} at hand, it is easy to apply the Theorem \ref{Theorem1.1} to extend
the strong solution $(\rho, u, P, d)$ beyond time $T^*$. Therefore, we complete the proof of Theorem \ref{blowupcriterion1}.
\section{Proof of Theorem \ref{blowupcriterion3}}
\quad In this section, we will also give the proof of Theorem \ref{blowupcriterion3} by contradiction. Assume $0 < T^* <\infty$ to be the maximum time for the existence of strong solution $(\rho, u, P, d)$ to \eqref{1.1}-\eqref{1.4}. Suppose that \eqref{1.10}
were false, that is
\begin{equation}\label{5.1}
M_1 \triangleq \underset{T \rightarrow T^*}{\lim}\left(\|\nabla \rho\|_{L^\infty(0,T;L^q)}
+\|\nabla d\|_{L^{s}(0,T;L_w^{r})}\right)< \infty.
\end{equation}
\begin{lemm}\label{lemma5.1}
Under the condition \eqref{5.1}, it holds that for $0\le T< T^*$,
\begin{equation}\label{5.2}
\int_0^T \int |\nabla^2 d|^2 dxd\tau \le C,
\end{equation}
where $C$ denotes generic constants depending only on $\Omega, M_1, T^*$ and the initial data.
\end{lemm}
\begin{proof}
By virtue of $|d|=1$, we have $d \cdot \Delta d=|\nabla d|^2$. Then, by \eqref{4.2}, we obtain
\begin{equation}\label{5.3}
\begin{aligned}
\int_0^T \int |\Delta d|^2 dxd\tau
&=\int_0^T \int |\nabla d|^4 dx d\tau+\int_0^T \int \left|\Delta d+|\nabla d|^2 d\right|^2 dxd\tau\\
&\le \int_0^T \int |\nabla d|^4 dx \tau+C.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
By Lemma \ref{lemma2.3} and \eqref{4.2} it is easy to deduce
\begin{equation*}
\begin{aligned}
\int |\nabla d|^4 dx
& =\int |\nabla d|^2 |\nabla d|^2 dx
\le \varepsilon \|\nabla d\|_{H^1}^2
+C(\varepsilon)\|\nabla d\|_{L_w^r}^\frac{2r}{r-2}\|\nabla d\|_{L^2}^2\\
&\le \varepsilon \|\nabla^2 d\|_{L^2}^2
+C(\varepsilon)(1+\|\nabla d\|_{L_w^r}^\frac{2r}{r-2}).\\
\end{aligned}
\end{equation*}
Applying the elliptic regularity with Neumann boundary, it arrives at
\begin{equation*}
\begin{aligned}
\int_0^T \|\nabla^2 d\|_{L^2}^2d\tau
& \le C\int_0^T (\|\Delta d\|_{L^2}^2+\|d\|_{H^1}^2)d\tau\\
& \le \varepsilon\int_0^T \|\nabla^2 d\|_{L^2}^2 d\tau+C(\varepsilon)\int_0^T (1+\|\nabla d\|_{L_w^r}^\frac{2r}{r-2})d\tau\\
& \le \varepsilon\int_0^T \|\nabla^2 d\|_{L^2}^2 d\tau+C(\varepsilon)\int_0^T (1+\|\nabla d\|_{L_w^r}^s)d\tau\\
& \le \varepsilon\int_0^T \|\nabla^2 d\|_{L^2}^2 d\tau+C,
\end{aligned}
\end{equation*}
where, $r$ and $s$ satisfy the condition \eqref{1.11}. Choosing $\varepsilon=\frac{1}{2},$ we get
\begin{equation*}
\int_0^T \int |\nabla^2 d|^2 dxd\tau \le C,
\end{equation*}
which completes the proof.
\end{proof}
\begin{lemm}\label{lemma5.2}
Under the condition \eqref{5.1}, it holds that for $0 \le T <T^*$,
\begin{equation}\label{5.4}
\begin{aligned}
&\underset{0 \le t \le T}{\sup}\left(\|\nabla u\|_{L^2}^2+\|\nabla d\|_{L^4}^4+\|\nabla^2 d\|_{L^2}^2\right)\\
&+\int_0^T \int \left(|\sqrt{\rho}\dot{u}|^2+|\nabla d|^2 |\nabla^2 d|^2 +|\nabla^3 d|^2+|\nabla d_t|^2\right)dxd\tau < \infty.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
\end{lemm}
\begin{proof}
By \eqref{4.21}, it is easy to deduce, for any $0 \le s< t\le T,$
\begin{equation}\label{5.5}
\begin{aligned}
&\quad \int(|\nabla u|^2+|\nabla^2 d|^2+|\nabla d|^4)(t)dx
+\int_s^t\int\left(\rho |\dot{u}|^2+|\nabla d|^2 |\nabla^2 d|^2+|\nabla(|\nabla d|^2)|^2\right.\\
&\quad \quad \left.+|\nabla^3 d|^2+|\nabla d_t|^2\right)dxd\tau\\
&\le C+C\int(|\nabla u|^2+|\nabla^2 d|^2+|\nabla d|^4)(s)dx+C\int_s^t (1+\|u\|_{L^\infty}^2+\|\nabla d\|_{L^\infty}^2) \\
&\quad \quad \times(1+\|\nabla u\|_{L^2}^2+\|\nabla^2 d\|_{L^2}^2+\|\nabla d\|_{L^4}^4)d\tau.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
Let
\begin{equation*}
\begin{aligned}
&A(t)=e+\int(|\nabla u|^2+|\nabla^2 d|^2+|\nabla d|^4)(t)dx
+\int_0^t\int\left(\rho |\dot{u}|^2+|\nabla d|^2 |\nabla^2 d|^2+|\nabla(|\nabla d|^2)|^2\right.\\
&\quad \quad \quad \left. +|\nabla^3 d|^2+|\nabla d_t|^2\right)dxd\tau,
\end{aligned}
\end{equation*}
then we deduce from \eqref{5.5} that
\begin{equation*}
A(t) \le CA(s)+C\int_0^t (1+\|u\|_{L^\infty}^2+\|\nabla d\|_{L^\infty}^2)A(\tau)d\tau,
\end{equation*}
which, together with the Gr\"{o}nwall inequality, gives directly that
\begin{equation*}
A(t) \le CA(s)\exp\left[C\int_s^t (1+\|u\|_{L^\infty}^2+\|\nabla d\|_{L^\infty}^2)d\tau\right].
\end{equation*}
Let
\begin{equation*}
\begin{aligned}
&\Phi(t)=e+\underset{0 \le \tau \le t}{\sup}(\|\nabla u\|_{L^2}^2+\|\nabla^2 d\|_{L^2}^2+\|\nabla d\|_{L^4}^4)
+\int_0^t\int\left(\rho |\dot{u}|^2+|\nabla d|^2 |\nabla^2 d|^2+|\nabla(|\nabla d|^2)|^2\right.\\
&\quad \quad \quad \left.+|\nabla^3 d|^2+|\nabla d_t|^2\right)dxd\tau,
\end{aligned}
\end{equation*}
then we have
\begin{equation}\label{5.6}
\Phi(T) \le C\Phi(s)\exp\left[C\int_s^T (1+\|u\|_{L^\infty}^2+\|\nabla d\|_{L^\infty}^2)d\tau\right].
\end{equation}
Now we control the term $\int_s^T (1+\|u\|_{L^\infty}^2+\|\nabla d\|_{L^\infty}^2)d\tau$. Indeed, by the Lemma \ref{lemma2.4}, we have
\begin{equation}\label{5.7}
\begin{aligned}
& \quad C\int_s^T (1+\|u\|_{L^\infty}^2+\|\nabla d\|_{L^\infty}^2)d\tau\\
& \le C\left[(T-s)+\left(\|u\|_{L^2(s,T; H^1)}^2+\|\nabla d\|_{L^2(s,T; H^1)}^2\right)
\left(\ln\left(e+\|u\|_{L^2(s,T; W^{1,3})}\right) \right.\right.\\
&\quad \quad \quad \left.\left.+\ln\left(e+\|\nabla d\|_{L^2(s,T; W^{1,3})}\right)\right)\right].
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
Applying the Sobolev inequality and regularity estimate, it arrives at
\begin{equation}\label{5.8}
\|u\|_{W^{1,3}}^2 \le C\|u\|_{W^{2,2}}^2 \le C(\|\sqrt{\rho}\dot{u}\|_{L^2}^2+\||\nabla d| |\nabla^2 d|\|_{L^2}^2),
\end{equation}
\begin{equation}\label{5.9}
\|\nabla d\|_{W^{1,3}}^2 \le C\|\nabla d\|_{W^{2,2}}^2 \le C(1+\|\nabla^2 d\|_{L^2}^2+\|\nabla^3 d\|_{L^2}^2).
\end{equation}
Substituting \eqref{5.8}-\eqref{5.9} into \eqref{5.7} yields
\begin{equation*}
C\int_s^T (1+\|u\|_{L^\infty}^2+\|\nabla d\|_{L^\infty}^2)d\tau
\le C+\ln [C\Phi(T)]^{C\left(\|u\|_{L^2(s,T; H^1)}^2+\|\nabla d\|_{L^2(s,T; H^1)}^2\right)},
\end{equation*}
which, together with \eqref{5.6}, gives directly that
\begin{equation*}
\Phi(T) \le C\Phi(s)\Phi(T)^{C\left(\|u\|_{L^2(s,T; H^1)}^2+\|\nabla d\|_{L^2(s,T; H^1)}^2\right)}.
\end{equation*}
Thanks to \eqref{4.2} and \eqref{5.2}, we can choose $s$ closes enough to $T^*$ such that
\begin{equation*}
\underset{T\rightarrow T^*}{\lim}{C\left(\|u\|_{L^2(s,T; H^1)}^2+\|\nabla d\|_{L^2(s,T; H^1)}^2\right)} \le \frac{1}{2},
\end{equation*}
which, means
\begin{equation*}
\Phi(T)\le C\Phi(s)^2 <\infty.
\end{equation*}
Thus, we complete the proof.
\end{proof}
\begin{rema}
Unfortunately, we cannot derive the bound, just depending on the initial data, for \eqref{5.4} owing to the technique used here. However, the bound is unform with respect to time in \eqref{5.4} since $s$, which closed enough to $T^*$, is fixed in process of the proof for Lemma \ref{lemma5.2}. Thus, we can rewrite \eqref{5.4} as
\begin{equation*}
\begin{aligned}
&\underset{t\in [0,T]}{\sup}\int \left(|\nabla u|^2+ |\nabla^2 d|^2+|\nabla d|^4\right)dx\\
&+\int_0^T \int \left(\rho |\dot{u}|^2+|\nabla d|^2|\nabla^2 d|^2+|\nabla d_t|^2+|\nabla^3 d|^2\right)dxdt\le C(s),
\end{aligned}
\end{equation*}
where and in what follows, $C(s)$ denotes generic constants depending not only on $\Omega, M_1, T^*$ and the initial data, but also on the data that is fixed on time $s$.
\end{rema}
Similar to Lemma \ref{lemma4.3}, as a corollary of Lemma \eqref{lemma4.2}, we have the following estimate.
\begin{coro}\label{lemma5.4}
Under the condition \eqref{5.1}, it holds that for $0 \le T<T^*$,
\begin{equation}\label{5.10}
\underset{0 \le t \le T}{\sup} \|d_t\|_{L^2}+\int_0^T \| u \|_{H^2}^2 d\tau \le C(s).
\end{equation}
\end{coro}
Now, we derive the high order estimate $\|\sqrt{\rho}u_t\|_{L^2}$ and $\|\nabla^3 d\|_{L^2}$.
\begin{lemm}\label{lemma5.5}
Under the condition \eqref{5.1}, it holds that for $0 \le T <T^*$,
\begin{equation}\label{5.11}
\underset{0 \le t \le T}{\sup}(\|\sqrt{\rho}u_t\|_{L^2}^2+\|\nabla^3 d\|_{L^2}^2)
+\int_0^t(\|\nabla u_t\|_{L^2}^2+ \|\nabla^2 d_t\|_{L^2}^2)d\tau
\le C(s).
\end{equation}
\end{lemm}
\begin{proof}
Recall from \eqref{4.29}, we have the following estimate
\begin{equation}\label{5.12}
\begin{aligned}
&\quad \frac{1}{2}\frac{d}{dt}\int \rho |u_t|^2dx+\frac{1}{C}\int |\nabla u_t|^2 dx\\
&\le C(\varepsilon)(\|\sqrt{\rho}u_t\|_{L^2}^2+\|\nabla^3 d\|_{L^2}^2+1)
+C(\varepsilon,\eta)\|\nabla d_t\|_{L^2}^2+\eta\|\nabla d_t\|_{H^1}^2+\varepsilon\|\nabla u_t\|_{L^2}^2\\
&\quad \quad +C\int |u| |\nabla \rho| |\nabla u| |\nabla u_t| dx.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
By \eqref{5.1}, H\"{o}lder, Sobolev ang Young inequalities, we obtain
\begin{equation}\label{5.13}
\begin{aligned}
\int |u| |\nabla \rho| |\nabla u| |\nabla u_t| dx
&\le \|u\|_{L^{\frac{2r}{r-2}}} \|\nabla u\|_{L^{\frac{rq}{q-r}}} \|\nabla \rho\|_{L^q} \|\nabla u_t\|_{L^2}\\
&\le C \|\nabla u\|_{L^2} \|\nabla u\|_{H^1} \|\nabla \rho\|_{L^q} \|\nabla u_t\|_{L^2}\\
&\le C(\varepsilon) \|\nabla u\|_{H^1}^2+\varepsilon\|\nabla u_t\|_{L^2}^2\\
&\le C(\|\sqrt{\rho}u\|_{L^2}^2+\|\nabla^3 d\|_{L^2}^2+1)+\varepsilon\|\nabla u_t\|_{L^2}^2.\\
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
Substituting \eqref{5.13} into \eqref{5.12}, we obtain
\begin{equation}\label{5.14}
\begin{aligned}
&\quad \frac{1}{2}\frac{d}{dt}\int \rho |u_t|^2dx+\frac{1}{C}\int |\nabla u_t|^2 dx\\
&\le C(\varepsilon)(\|\sqrt{\rho}u_t\|_{L^2}^2+\|\nabla^3 d\|_{L^2}^2+1)
+C(\varepsilon,\eta)\|\nabla d_t\|_{L^2}^2+\eta\|\nabla d_t\|_{H^1}^2+\varepsilon\|\nabla u_t\|_{L^2}^2.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
Thanks to the compatibility condition, after choosing $\varepsilon$ small enough, we get
\begin{equation}\label{5.15}
\begin{aligned}
&\quad \|\sqrt{\rho}u_t\|_{L^2}^2+\int_0^t \|\nabla u_t\|_{L^2}^2 d\tau\\
&\le C(\eta)+C\int_0^t (1+\|\sqrt{\rho}u_t\|_{L^2}^2+\|\nabla^3 d\|_{L^2}^2) d\tau+\eta \int_0^t \|\nabla^2 d_t\|_{L^2}^2 d\tau.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
Recall from \eqref{4.38}, we have the estimate
\begin{equation}\label{5.16}
\begin{aligned}
&\quad \|\nabla^3 d\|_{L^2}^2+\int_0^t \|\nabla^2 d_t\|_{L^2}^2d\tau\\
&\le C +C(\delta)\int_0^t(1+\|\sqrt{\rho}u_t\|_{L^2}^2+\|\nabla^3 d\|_{L^2}^2)\|\nabla^3 d\|_{L^2}^2d\tau
+\delta \int_0^t \|\nabla u_t\|_{L^2}^2 d\tau.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
Adding \eqref{5.15} to \eqref{5.16} and choosing $\varepsilon$ and $\delta$ small enough, we have
\begin{equation*}
\begin{aligned}
&\quad (\|\sqrt{\rho}u_t\|_{L^2}^2+\|\nabla^3 d\|_{L^2}^2)
+\int_0^t(\|\nabla u_t\|_{L^2}^2+ \|\nabla^2 d_t\|_{L^2}^2)d\tau\\
&\le C +C\int_0^t(1+\|\sqrt{\rho}u_t\|_{L^2}^2+\|\nabla^3 d\|_{L^2}^2)(1+\|\nabla^3 d\|_{L^2}^2)d\tau,
\end{aligned}
\end{equation*}
which, together with the Gr\"{o}nwall inequality, complete the proof of the lemma.
\end{proof}
As a corollary of Lemma \ref{lemma5.5}, it is easy to deduce the following estimate
\begin{equation*}
\begin{aligned}
&\underset{0 \le t \le T}{\sup}(\|\rho_t\|_{L^q}+\|u\|_{H^2}+\|P\|_{H^1}+\|\nabla d_t\|_{L^2})\\
&+\int_0^T \left(\|u\|_{W^{2,r}}^2+\|P\|_{W^{1,r}}^2+\|d_{tt}\|_{L^2}^2+\|\nabla^4 d\|_{L^2}^2\right)dt\le C(s).
\end{aligned}
\end{equation*}
Therefore, having all the estimates at hand, it is easy to extend the strong solution beyond time $T^*$. Thus, we complete the proof of Theorem \ref{blowupcriterion3}.
\section{Proof of Corollary \ref{blowupcriterion5}}
\quad In this section, we will give the proof Corollary \ref{blowupcriterion5}. Indeed, let $(\rho, u, P, d)$ be the solution of \eqref{1.1}-\eqref{1.4}, we will derive some maximal principle for the direction field.
\begin{lemm}
For some given constant $\underline{d}_{0i}(i=1, 2)$, then we have the following maximal principle:\\
{\rm (i)}If $0 \le \underline{d}_{0i} \le d_{0i}\le 1$, then $0 \le \underline{d}_{0i} \le d_{i}\le 1$ for any $i=1,2;$\\
{\rm (ii)}If $-1\le d_{0i}\le -\underline{d}_{0i} \le 0 $, then $-1\le d_{i}\le -\underline{d}_{0i} \le 0$ for any $i=1,2.$\\
\end{lemm}
\begin{proof}
Since {\rm (i)} has been proved in \cite{Jiang-Jiang-Wang}, we only give the proof of {\rm (ii)}. Indeed, letting $V_i=d_i+\underline{d}_{0i}$ and $V^+_i=\max\{V_i, 0\}\ge 0,$ then we obtain
\begin{equation}\label{6.1}
\partial_t V_i-\Delta V_i=|\nabla d|^2 (V_i-\underline{d}_{0i})-u \cdot \nabla V_i.
\end{equation}
Multiplying \eqref{6.1} by $V_i^+$ and using the Neumann boundary condition
$\left.\frac{\partial d}{\partial \nu}\right|_{\partial \Omega}=0$, we get that
\begin{equation*}
\begin{aligned}
&\quad \frac{d}{dt}\frac{1}{2}\|V_i^+\|_{L^2}^2+\|\nabla V_i^+\|_{L^2}^2
=\int \left[|\nabla d|^2 (V_i-\underline{d}_{0i})-u \cdot \nabla V_i\right]\cdot V_i^+ dx\\
&=\int |\nabla d|^2 |V_i^+|^2 dx-\int |\nabla d|^2 \underline{d}_{0i}V^+_i dx +\frac{1}{2}\int {\rm div}u |V_i^+|^2 dx\\
&\le\int |\nabla d|^2 |V_i^+|^2 dx \le \|\nabla d\|_{L^\infty}^2 \|V_i^+\|_{L^2}^2.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation*}
Hence, if we applying Gr\"{o}nwall inequality to the above inequality, we get
\begin{equation*}
\|V_i^+(t)\|_{L^2}^2 \le \|V_i^+(0)\|_{L^2}^2 \exp\left(C\int_0^t \|\nabla d\|_{L^\infty}^2 d\tau\right)=0,
\end{equation*}
which implies $-1 \le d_i \le -\underline{d}_{0i}\le 0.$
\end{proof}
Before starting our main result in this section, we recall the elliptic estimate
\begin{equation}\label{6.2}
\|\nabla^2 f\|_{L^2}^2 \le C_1 (\|\Delta f\|_{L^2}^2+\|f\|_{H^1}^2),
\end{equation}
and the Gagliardo-Nirenberg inequality
\begin{equation}\label{6.3}
\|\nabla f\|_{L^4}^4 \le C_2 (\|\nabla^2 f\|_{L^2}^2\|f\|_{L^\infty}^2+\|f\|_{L^\infty}^4),
\end{equation}
where the constants $C_1$ and $C_2$ independent of the function $f$.
\begin{lemm}
For any $i(i=1,2),$ if the $i-$th component of initial direction field $d_{0i}$ satisfies the condition
\begin{equation}\label{6.4}
0 \le \underline{d}_{0i} \le d_{0i} \le 1 \quad {\rm or} \quad -1\le d_{0i} \le -\underline{d}_{0i}\le 0,
\end{equation}
where $\underline{d}_{0i}$ is a constant and is defined by
\begin{equation}\label{6.5}
\underline{d}_{0i}>1-\frac{1}{2C_1 C_2},
\end{equation}
where the constant $C_1$ and $C_2$ are defined in \eqref{6.2} and \eqref{6.3} respectively.
Then we have the following estimate
\begin{equation}\label{6.6}
\int_0^T \|\nabla d\|_{L^4}^4 dt \le C.
\end{equation}
\end{lemm}
\begin{proof}We only give the proof for the case $i=2$.\\
Indeed, if $0 \le \underline{d}_{02} \le d_{02} \le 1$, then applying the maximal principle, we obtain
\begin{equation}
0 \le \underline{d}_{02} \le d_{2} \le 1 \quad {\rm for \ any } \ t>0 \ {\rm and \ any} \ x \in \Omega.
\end{equation}
By virtue of $|d|=1,$ then
\begin{equation}\label{6.8}
\|d-e_2\|_{L^\infty}^2 \le 2(1-\underline{d}_{02}),
\end{equation}
where $e_2=(0,1).$ Substituting \eqref{6.4}-\eqref{6.5} into \eqref{6.8}, we get
\begin{equation}\label{6.9}
C_1 C_2 \|d-e_2\|_{L^\infty}^2<1.
\end{equation}
Combining \eqref{6.2} with \eqref{6.3}, we get
\begin{equation}\label{6.10}
\begin{aligned}
&\quad \|\nabla^2 d\|_{L^2}^2 \le C_1 (\|\Delta d\|_{L^2}^2+\|d\|_{H^1}^2)\\
&\le C_1 (\|\nabla d\|_{L^4}^4+\| \Delta d+|\nabla d|^2 d\|_{L^2}^2+\|d\|_{H^1}^2)\\
&\le C_1 C_2 \|d-e_2\|_{L^\infty}^2\|\nabla^2 d\|_{L^2}^2
+C_1 \left(C_2\|d-e_2\|_{L^\infty}^4+\|\Delta d+|\nabla d|^2 d\|_{L^2}^2+\|d\|_{H^1}^2\right),
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
which, together with \eqref{6.8}, gives
\begin{equation}\label{6.11}
\|\nabla^2 d\|_{L^2}^2 \le C\left(\|d-e_2\|_{L^\infty}^4+\|\Delta d+|\nabla d|^2 d\|_{L^2}^2+\|d\|_{H^1}^2\right).
\end{equation}
In view of the basic energy inequality \eqref{4.2}, we have
\begin{equation*}
\int_0^T \|\nabla^2 d\|_{L^2}^2 dt \le C,
\end{equation*}
which, together with \eqref{6.3}, implies
\begin{equation}\label{6.12}
\int_0^T \|\nabla d\|_{L^4}^4 dt \le C.
\end{equation}
As for the case $-1\le d_{0i} \le -\underline{d}_{0i}\le 0$, it is simple fact if we replaced the function
$d-e_2$ by $d+e_2$ in \eqref{6.8}-\eqref{6.11} respectively. Hence, we complete the proof.
\end{proof}
Choosing $r=s=4$ in \eqref{1.11}, if the maximal existence of time $T^*<\infty$, we have
\begin{equation*}
\underset{T \rightarrow T^*}{\lim}\left(\|\nabla \rho\|_{L^\infty(0,T;L^q)}+\|\nabla d\|_{L^{4}(0,T;L_w^{4})}\right)=\infty,
\end{equation*}
which, together with \eqref{6.12}, gives immediately
\begin{equation*}
\underset{T \rightarrow T^*}{\lim}\|\nabla \rho\|_{L^\infty(0,T;L^q)}=\infty.
\end{equation*}
Therefore, we complete the proof of Corollary \ref{blowupcriterion5}.\\
\noindent\textbf{Acknowledgements}\quad
Qiang Tao's research was supported by the NSF(Grant No.11171060) and the NSF(Grant No.11301345).
Zheng-an Yao's research was supported in part by NNSFC(Grant No.11271381) and China 973 Program(Grant No. 2011CB808002).
\phantomsection
\addcontentsline{toc}{section}{\refname}
|
\section{Introduction}
Let $(S,\mathcal{S})$ be a measurable space, and let $X,X_1,\dots,X_n$ be a sequence of i.i.d. random variables taking values in $(S,\mathcal{S})$ with a common distribution $P$. We assume that $S$ is a separable metric space and $\mathcal{S}$ is its Borel $\sigma$-field. Let $\mathcal{F}$ be a class of measurable functions $f:S\to \mathbb{R}$ with a measurable envelope $F:S\to\mathbb{R}$ satisfying $F(x)\geq \sup_{f\in\mathcal{F}}|f(x)|$ for all $x\in S$. Define the empirical process indexed by $\mathcal{F}$:
\[
\mathbb{G}_n f=\frac{1}{\sqrt{n}}\sum_{i=1}^n (f(X_i)-Pf), \ f \in \mathcal{F},
\]
where $Pf=\int f d P=\mathbb{E}[f(X)]$. Let $e_1,\dots,e_n$ be independent standard Gaussian random variables independent of $X_{1}^{n} := \{ X_1,\dots,X_n\}$. Define the multiplier bootstrap process indexed by $\mathcal{F}$:
\begin{equation}\label{eq: MB process}
\mathbb{G}_n^e f = \frac{1}{\sqrt{n}}\sum_{i=1}^n e_i (f(X_i)-P_n f), \ f \in \mathcal{F},
\end{equation}
where $P_n$ is the empirical measure with respect to $X_{1},\dots,X_{n}$; that is, $P_n f =n^{-1}\sum_{i=1}^n f(X_i)$ for $f \in \mathcal{F}$. Let $N_1,\dots, N_n$ be a sequence of random variables multinomially distributed with parameters $n$ and (probabilities) $1/n,\dots,1/n$ that are independent of $X_{1}^{n}$. Define the empirical bootstrap process indexed by $\mathcal{F}$:
\[
\mathbb{G}_n^* f = \frac{1}{\sqrt{n}}\sum_{i=1}^n (N_i-1)f(X_i), \ f \in \mathcal{F}.
\]
Suppose that $\mathcal{F} \subset \mathcal{L}^{2}(P)$ is a VC type class of functions (the definition of VC type classes is recalled in Section \ref{sec: couplings}) with $\sup_{f \in \mathcal{F}} |Pf| < \infty$.
Then $\mathcal{F}$ is totally bounded with respect to the semimetric
\[
e_{P}(f,g) = \sqrt{P(f-g)^{2}}, \ f,g \in \mathcal{F},
\]
and there exists a centered Gaussian process $G_P$ indexed by $\mathcal{F}$ with uniformly $e_{P}$-continuous sample paths and covariance function
\begin{equation}\label{eq: covariance function}
\mathbb{E}[G_P(f) G_P(g)]=\text{Cov}(f(X),g(X)), \ f,g \in \mathcal{F}.
\end{equation}
In this paper, for a given functional $B: \mathcal{F} \to \mathbb{R}$, we are interested in constructing couplings for
\begin{align}
Z=\sup_{f\in\mathcal{F}} (B(f)+\mathbb{G}_n f) \quad &\text{and} \quad \tilde{Z} \stackrel{d}{=} \sup_{f\in\mathcal{F}} (B(f)+G_P f), \label{eq: emp process} \\
Z^e=\sup_{f\in\mathcal{F}} (B(f)+\mathbb{G}_n^e f) \quad &\text{and} \quad \tilde{Z}^e \stackrel{d \mid X_1^n}{=} \sup_{f\in\mathcal{F}} (B(f)+G_P f), \label{eq: mult bootstrap process} \\
Z^*=\sup_{f\in\mathcal{F}} (B(f)+\mathbb{G}_n^* f) \quad &\text{and} \quad \tilde{Z}^* \stackrel{d \mid X_1^n}{=} \sup_{f \in \mathcal{F}} (B(f)+G_P f), \label{eq: emp bootstrap process}
\end{align}
such that the random variables appearing in each line are close to each other with high probability. The notation $\stackrel{d}{=}$ means equality in distribution, and $\stackrel{d \mid X_1^n}{=}$ means equality in conditional distribution given $X_{1}^{n}=\{ X_{1},\dots,X_{n} \}$. Here we suppose that the probability space is such that
\[
(\Omega, \mathcal{A}, \mathbb{P}) = (S^{n},\mathcal{S}^{n},P^{n}) \times (T,\mathcal{T},Q) \times ([0,1],\mathcal{B}([0,1]),\lambda)
\]
where $X_1,\dots,X_n$ are the coordinate projections of $(S^{n},\mathcal{S}^{n},P^{n})$, random variables $e_1,\dots,e_n$ (or $N_1,\dots,N_n$) depend on the ``second'' coordinate only, and $([0,1],\mathcal{B}([0,1]),\lambda)$ is the Lebesgue probability space on $[0,1]$, that is, $\mathcal{B}([0,1])$ is the Borel $\sigma$-field on $[0,1]$ and $\lambda$ is the Lebesgue measure on $[0,1]$. The last augmentation of the probability space enables us to generate a uniform random variable on $[0,1]$ independent of $X_{1},\dots,X_{n}$ and $e_{1},\dots,e_{n}$ (or $N_{1},\dots,N_{n}$).
We also implicitly assume here that the functional $B$ and the class $\mathcal{F}$ are ``nice'' enough so that measurability problems do not arise; see Section \ref{sec: couplings} for explicit assumptions.
Our coupling constructions are based on the Slepian-Stein methods and Gaussian comparison inequalities and built on the ideas in \cite{C05a, C05b, CCK0, CCK1, CCK4, CCK2, CCK3}. We emphasize that the construction of couplings in this paper is non-asymptotic, and so the class of functions $\mathcal{F}=\mathcal{F}_n$ may depend on $n$, and its complexity may grow as the sample size increases. This feature of the couplings is especially important in modern nonparametric statistics \cite{GN15}; see \cite{CCK1} and \cite{CCK4} for examples of applications.
We also emphasize that our couplings are not of the Hungarian type, and so are different from those obtained in e.g. \cite{K94} and \cite{R94}, among many others. In particular, in contrast to e.g. \cite{R94}, our couplings do not depend on the maximal total variation in $\mathcal{F}$. Instead, the couplings only depend on VC properties of the class of functions $\mathcal{F}$ as well as on certain moments of the functions in $\mathcal{F}$ and the envelope $F$.
This feature of the construction leads to a different range of possible applications in comparison with Hungarian couplings; see the detailed discussion in \cite{CCK1}.
Gaussian and bootstrap approximations of the supremum of a {\em non-centered} empirical process have many potential applications.
For example, these approximations can be used to derive non-asymptotic bounds on the errors in multivariate CLT. Specifically, let $S=\mathbb{R}^p$, and let $A$ be a closed convex set in $S$. For $\mathcal{V}^{p-1}=\{v\in \mathbb{R}^p: \|v\|=1\}$, let $V_A:\mathcal{V}^{p-1}\to \mathbb{R}$ be the support function of $A$ defined by $V_A(v)=\sup_{x\in A}v^{T}x$. Then $x\in A$ if and only if $\sup_{v\in \mathcal{V}^{p-1}}(v^{T}x - V_A(v))\leq 0$. Therefore, our results can be used to approximate
\begin{equation}
\label{eq: prob example}
\mathbb{P}\Big(\frac{1}{\sqrt{n}}\sum_{i=1}^n X_i\in A\Big)=\mathbb{P}\Big(\sup_{v\in \mathcal{V}^{p-1}}\Big(\frac{1}{\sqrt{n}}\sum_{i=1}^n v^{T}X_i - V_A(v)\Big)\leq 0\Big).
\end{equation}
Here, the dimension $p=p_n$ of the sample space $S=\mathbb{R}^p$ can depend on the sample size $n$ and increase as $n$ grows. Importantly, if the set $A$ is such that the set $\mathcal{V}^{p-1}$ on the right-hand side of (\ref{eq: prob example}) can be reduced to a sufficiently small subset of $\mathcal{V}^{p-1}$, the Gaussian approximation becomes possible even if $p$ is larger or much larger than $n$; see \cite{CCK0} and \cite{CCK3} for examples. More broadly, one can use our results for distributional approximation of general convex functionals on $\mathbb{R}^p$ where the probability measure on $\mathbb{R}^p$ is given by the distribution of a normalized sum of i.i.d. random vectors; see Section 11 of \cite{DLS98} where it is demonstrated that such functionals can be represented as suprema of non-centered empirical processes.
Another possible application is to study power properties of nonparametric tests where under the null, the statistic can be approximated by $\sup_{f\in\mathcal{F}} \mathbb{G}_n f$, and under the alternative, the statistic can be approximated by $\sup_{f\in \mathcal{F}}(B(f)+\mathbb{G}_n f)$, the functional $B$ representing deviations from the null hypothesis.
Finally, non-centered empirical processes are useful fore multi-scale testing where one combines many statistics corresponding to different scales into one test using scale-dependent critical value for each statistic; see \cite{DS01} where such tests were used for qualitative hypotheses testing.
This paper builds upon but differs from our previous papers \cite{CCK0,CCK1,CCK4,CCK2,CCK3}. In particular, this paper establishes, in the infinite dimensional setting, formal results on the multiplier and empirical bootstraps when the envelope $F$ may be unbounded. In addition, this paper allows to approximate the supremum of a possibly non-centered empirical process. These settings are not covered in our previous papers \cite{CCK0,CCK1,CCK4,CCK2,CCK3} and are new.
The organization of this paper is as follows. In the next section, we present our main coupling theorems. In Section \ref{sec: auxiliary couplings}, we derive two auxiliary theorems that deal with maxima of high-dimensional random vectors. All the proofs are deferred to Sections \ref{sec: proofs} and \ref{sec: proofs auxiliary couplings}. For convenience of the reader, we cite some additional results that are useful in our derivations in Section \ref{sec: technical tools}.
\subsection{Notation}
We use standard notation from the empirical process literature. For any probability measure $Q$ on a measurable space $(S,\mathcal{S})$, we use the notation $Qf = \int f dQ$.
For $p\geq 1$, we use $\mathcal{L}^{p}( Q )$ to denote the space of all measurable functions $f: S \to \mathbb{R}$ such that $\| f \|_{Q,p} = (Q | f |^{p})^{1/p} < \infty$.
We define the (semi)metric $e_{Q}$ on $\mathcal{L}^{2}( Q )$ by
$e_{Q}(f,g) = \| f - g \|_{Q,2}, \ f,g \in \mathcal{L}^{2}( Q )$.
For $\varepsilon > 0$, an $\varepsilon$-net of a (semi)metric space $(T,d)$ is a subset $T_{\varepsilon}$ of $T$ such that for every $t \in T$ there exists a point $t_{\varepsilon} \in T_{\varepsilon}$ with $d (t,t_{\varepsilon}) < \varepsilon$. The $\varepsilon$-covering number $N(T,d,\varepsilon)$ of $T$ is the infimum of the cardinality of $\varepsilon$-nets of $T$, that is, $N(T,d,\varepsilon) = \inf \{ \Card (T_{\varepsilon}) : \ \text{$T_{\varepsilon}$ is an $\varepsilon$-net of $T$} \}$. For a subset $A$ of a semimetric space $(T,d)$, we use $A^{\delta}$ to denote the $\delta$-enlargement of $A$, that is, $A^{\delta} = \{ x \in T : d(x,A) \leq \delta \}$ where $d(x,A) = \inf_{y \in A}d(x,y)$. We also use the notation $\| \cdot \|_{T} = \sup_{t \in T} \| \cdot \|$.
For a function $g:\mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}$, we write $\|g\|_\infty=\sup_{x\in\mathbb{R}}|g(x)|$, and assuming that $g$ is differentiable, we use $g'$ to denote the derivative of $g$. We denote by $C^k(\mathbb{R})$ the space of $k$-times continuously differentiable functions on $\mathbb{R}$.
For $a,b \in \mathbb{R}$, we use the notation $a \vee b = \max \{ a,b \}$.
\section{Main results}
\label{sec: couplings}
In this section, we construct couplings between random variables in (\ref{eq: emp process}), (\ref{eq: mult bootstrap process}), and (\ref{eq: emp bootstrap process}) when $\mathcal{F}$ is a VC type class of functions. Recall the definition:
\begin{definition}[VC type class]
Let $\mathcal{F}$ be a class of measurable functions on a measurable space $(S,\mathcal{S})$, to which a measurable envelope $F$ is attached.
We say that $\mathcal{F}$ is VC type with envelope $F$ if there are constants $A,v > 0$ such that
$\sup_{Q} N(\mathcal{F},e_{Q},\varepsilon \| F \|_{Q,2}) \leq (A/\varepsilon)^{v}$ for all $0 < \varepsilon \leq 1$, where the supremum is taken over all finitely discrete probability measures on $(S,\mathcal{S})$.
\end{definition}
Let $B: \mathcal{F} \to \mathbb{R}$ be a given functional, and for $\eta>0$, let $N_{B}(\eta)$ be the minimal integer $N$ such that there exist $f_{1},\dots,f_{N} \in \mathcal{F}$ with the property that for every $f\in \mathcal{F}$, there exists $1 \leq j \leq N$ with $|B(f)-B(f_j)|<\eta$. We make the following assumptions.
\begin{enumerate}
\item[(A)]
There exists a countable subset $\mathcal{G}$ of $\mathcal{F}$ such that for any $f \in \mathcal{F}$, there exists a sequence $g_{m} \in \mathcal{G}$ with $g_{m} \to f$ pointwise and $B(g_m)\to B(f)$.
\item[(B)]
The class of functions $\mathcal{F}$ is VC type with a measurable envelope $F$ and constants $A\geq e$ and $v\geq 1$.
\item[(C)]
There exist constants $b \geq \sigma>0$ and $q\in[4,\infty)$ such that $\sup_{f\in\mathcal{F}}P|f|^k\leq \sigma^2 b^{k-2}$ for $k=2,3,4$, and $\|F\|_{P,q}\leq b$.
\end{enumerate}
Assumptions (B) and (C) guarantee that $\mathcal{F}$ is totally bounded with respect to the semimetric $e_{P}$, and there exists a centered Gaussian process $G_{P}$ indexed by $\mathcal{F}$ with uniformly $e_{P}$-continuous sample paths and covariance function given in (\ref{eq: covariance function}).
Pick any $\eta > 0$ and put
\[
K_n = K_{n} (v,A,b,\sigma,B,\eta) = \log N_{B}(\eta) + v(\log n\vee\log (A b/\sigma)).
\]
The following theorem provides a coupling for $Z$ and $\tilde{Z}$.
\begin{theorem}[Coupling for the supremum of the empirical process]\label{thm: inf dim GAR}
Suppose that assumptions (A)--(C) are satisfied, and in addition suppose that $K_{n}^{3} \leq n$. Let $Z=\sup_{f\in\mathcal{F}}(B(f)+\mathbb{G}_n f)$. Then for every $\gamma\in(0,1)$, there exists a random variable $\tilde{Z}\stackrel{d}{=} \sup_{f \in \mathcal{F}} (B(f)+G_{P}f)$ such that
\[
\mathbb{P} \{ |Z-\tilde{Z}|>C_1 (\eta + \delta^{(1)}_{n}) \} \leq C_{2} (\gamma + n^{-1}) \\
\]
where $C_1,C_2$ are positive constants that depend only on $q$, and
\begin{equation}\label{eq: delta1}
\delta_{n}^{(1)} = \delta_{n}^{(1)} (v,A,b,\sigma,q,B,\eta,\gamma) = \frac{b K_n}{\gamma^{1/q} n^{1/2-1/q}}+\frac{(b \sigma^2 K_n^2)^{1/3}}{\gamma^{1/3}n^{1/6}}.
\end{equation}
\end{theorem}
The result in Theorem \ref{thm: inf dim GAR} is new because it allows for non-centered processes. In addition, even in the case of centered processes, i.e. when $B\equiv 0$, the bound here improves slightly on our previous result given in Corollary 2.2 of \cite{CCK1}.
\begin{remark}[Comparison with Beck's \cite{Beck85} lower bounds]
Suppose that $\mathcal{F}$ is the class of indicators of closed balls in $\mathbb{R}^{d}$, and $X_{1},X_{2},\dots$ are i.i.d. uniform random variables on $[0,1]^{d}$. Then \cite{M89} proved, via KMT constructions, that there exist versions $B_{n}$ of $G_{P}$ such that
\begin{equation}
\| \mathbb{G}_{n} - B_{n} \|_{\mathcal{F}} := \sup_{f \in \mathcal{F}} | \mathbb{G}_{n}f - B_{n}f| = O\{ n^{-1/(2d)}(\log n)^{3/2} \} \quad a.s., \label{eq: KMT rate}
\end{equation}
and up to a possible power of $\log n$, this rate is best possible when $d \geq 2$ (Beck \cite{Beck85}, Theorem 2).
We shall apply Theorem \ref{thm: inf dim GAR} to this class of functions. In this example, $B \equiv 0$, and so $N_{B}(\eta) \equiv 1$. Since the class of closed balls in $\mathbb{R}^{d}$ is a VC class with index $d+2$ \citep[see][]{Du79}, assumption (B) is satisfied with $F \equiv 1, v = cd$ with some universal constant $c$, and $A$ being some universal constant.
In addition, assumption (C) is satisfied with $\sigma=b=1$ and arbitrary $q\in[4,\infty)$, so there is a universal constant $c'$ such that
\[
\delta_{n}^{(1)} \leq c' \{ \gamma^{-1/q} d n^{-1/2+1/q} \log n +\gamma^{-1/3} d^{2/3} n^{-1/6} (\log n)^{2/3} \}.
\]
If we take $\gamma=\gamma_{n} \to 0$ sufficiently slowly, say $\gamma_{n} = (\log n)^{-1/2}$, then for $Z_{n} = \sup_{f \in \mathcal{F}} \mathbb{G}_{n}f$, Theorem \ref{thm: inf dim GAR} implies that there exists a sequence $\tilde{Z}_{n}$ of random variables with $\tilde{Z}_{n} \stackrel{d}{=} \sup_{f \in \mathcal{F}} G_{P}f$ such that
\begin{equation}
\label{eq: coupiling balls}
|Z_{n} - \tilde{Z}_{n}| = o_{\mathbb{P}}\{ d n^{-1/2+1/q} (\log n)^{1+1/(2q)} + d^{2/3} n^{-1/6} (\log n)^{5/6}\}.
\end{equation}
This holds even when $d=d_{n} \to \infty$ as long as $d \log n= o(n^{1/3})$ (which guarantees $K_n^{3} \leq n$), and the right-hand side on (\ref{eq: coupiling balls}) is $o_{\mathbb{P}}(1)$ if $d (\log n)^{5/4} = O(n^{1/4})$ by setting $q$ large enough. It is then clear that, although Theorem \ref{thm: inf dim GAR} is only applicable to the supremum, and there is a difference in the mode of convergence, the rate of approximation of our coupling in (\ref{eq: coupiling balls}) is better than that implied by (\ref{eq: KMT rate}) when $d$ is large. \qed
\end{remark}
Next we provide a coupling for $Z^{e}$ and $\tilde{Z}^{e}$.
\begin{theorem}[Coupling for the supremum of the multiplier bootstrap process]
\label{thm: inf dim MB}
Suppose that assumptions (A)--(C) are satisfied, and in addition suppose that $K_n \leq n$. Let $Z^e=\sup_{f\in\mathcal{F}}(B(f)+\mathbb{G}_n^e f)$. Then for every $\gamma\in(0,1)$, there exists a random variable $\tilde{Z}^e \stackrel{d \mid X_{1}^{n}}{=} \sup_{f\in\mathcal{F}}(B(f)+G_P f)$ such that
\[
\mathbb{P} \{ |Z^e-\tilde{Z}^e|>C_3 (\eta + \delta^{(2)}_{n}) \} \leq C_4 (\gamma + n^{-1}),
\]
where $C_3,C_4$ are positive constants that depend only on $q$, and
\[
\delta_{n}^{(2)} = \delta_{n}^{(2)}(v,A,b,\sigma,q,B,\eta,\gamma) = \frac{b K_n}{\gamma^{1 + 1/q}n^{1/2-1/q}} + \frac{(b\sigma K_n^{3/2})^{1/2}}{\gamma^{1 + 1/q}n^{1/4}}.
\]
\end{theorem}
Finally, we provide a coupling for $Z^*$ and $\tilde{Z}^*$.
\begin{theorem}[Coupling for the supremum of the empirical bootstrap process]
\label{thm: inf dim EB}
Suppose that assumptions (A)--(C) are satisfied, and in addition suppose that $K_n^3 \leq n$. Let $Z^*=\sup_{f\in\mathcal{F}}(B(f)+\mathbb{G}_n^* f)$. Then for every $\gamma\in(0,1)$, there exists a random variable $\tilde{Z}^* \stackrel{d \mid X_{1}^{n}}{=} \sup_{f\in\mathcal{F}}(B(f)+G_P f)$ such that
\[
\mathbb{P} \{ |Z^*-\tilde{Z}^*|>C_5 (\eta + \delta^{(3)}_{n}) \} \leq C_6 (\gamma + n^{-1}),
\]
where $C_5,C_6$ are positive constants that depend only on $q$, and
\begin{align*}
\delta_{n}^{(3)} &= \delta_{n}^{(3)}(v,A,b,\sigma,q,B,\eta,\gamma) \\
& = \frac{b K_n}{\gamma^{1 + 1/q}n^{1/2-1/q}} + \frac{(b\sigma^2 K_n^{2})^{1/3}}{\gamma^{1/3} n^{1/6}} + \frac{(b \sigma K_n^{3/2})^{1/2}}{\gamma^{1 + 1/q}n^{1/4}}.
\end{align*}
\end{theorem}
\begin{remark}
\label{rem: conditional coupling}
By Markov's inequality, the following inequality is directly deduced from Theorem \ref{thm: inf dim MB}: under the conditions of Theorem \ref{thm: inf dim MB}, for every $\alpha \in (0,1)$, with probability at least $1-\alpha$, we have
\[
\mathbb{P} \{ |Z^{e} - \tilde{Z}^{e}| > C_3 (\eta + \delta^{(2)}_{n}) \mid X_{1}^{n} \} \leq \alpha^{-1} C_{4} (\gamma+n^{-1}).
\]
Likewise, the following inequality is directly deduced from Theorem \ref{thm: inf dim EB}: under the conditions of Theorem \ref{thm: inf dim EB}, for every $\alpha \in (0,1)$, with probability at least $1-\alpha$, we have
\[
\mathbb{P} \{ |Z^{*} - \tilde{Z}^{*}| > C_5 (\eta + \delta^{(3)}_{n}) \mid X_{1}^{n} \} \leq \alpha^{-1} C_{6} (\gamma+n^{-1}).
\]
\qed
\end{remark}
\begin{remark}
\label{rem: bounds in Kolmogorov distance}
In applications to statistics, it is often more useful to have bounds on the Kolmogorov distance for the following pairs of distribution functions: $\mathbb{P}(Z \leq \cdot)$ and $\mathbb{P}(\tilde{Z} \leq \cdot)$; $\mathbb{P}(Z^{e} \leq \cdot \mid X_{1}^{n})$ and $\mathbb{P}(\tilde{Z} \leq \cdot)$; and $\mathbb{P}(Z^{*} \leq \cdot \mid X_{1}^{n}) $ and $\mathbb{P}(\tilde{Z} \leq \cdot)$.
Once such bounds are obtained, we will have a bound on, say, the Kolmogorov distance between $\mathbb{P}(Z \leq \cdot)$ and $\mathbb{P}(Z^{e} \leq \cdot \mid X_{1}^{n})$. By the following simple lemma, we see that to obtain such bounds from the coupling inequalities stated in Theorems \ref{thm: inf dim GAR}--\ref{thm: inf dim EB}, we need an {\em anti-concentration} inequality for $\tilde{Z}$, that is, an inequality bounding $\sup_{t \in \mathbb{R}} \mathbb{P}(|\tilde{Z} - t| \leq \varepsilon)$ for $\varepsilon > 0$.
\begin{lemma}
Let $V,W$ be real-valued random variables such that $\mathbb{P}(|V-W| > r_{1}) \leq r_{2}$ for some constants $r_{1},r_{2} > 0$. Then we have
\[
\sup_{t \in \mathbb{R}} |\mathbb{P}(V \leq t) - \mathbb{P}(W \leq t)| \leq \sup_{t \in \mathbb{R}}\mathbb{P}(| W-t| \leq r_{1}) + r_{2}.
\]
\end{lemma}
The proof of this lemma is immediate and hence omitted. In the case where $B(\cdot) \equiv 0$, a useful anti-concentration inequality for $\tilde{Z}$ is found in Lemma A.1 in \cite{CCK1}, which essentially follows from Theorem 3 in \cite{CCK2}. Lemma A.1 in \cite{CCK1} does not cover, however, non-centered Gaussian processes. Therefore, here we provide a new anti-concentration inequality that can be applied to non-centered Gaussian processes. The proof of the lemma can be found in Section \ref{sec: proofs}.
\begin{lemma}
\label{lem: AC for nonzero mean}
Let $T$ be a non-empty set, and let $\ell^{\infty}(T)$ be the set of all bounded functions on $T$ endowed with the sup-norm. Let $X(t), t \in T$ be a possibly non-centered tight Gaussian random element in $\ell^{\infty}(T)$ such that $\underline{\sigma}^{2} := \inf_{t \in T} \Var (X(t)) > 0$.
Define $d(s,t) := \sqrt{{\mathrm{E}}[ (X(t)-X(s))^{2}]}, \ s,t \in T$, and for $\delta > 0$, define $\phi (\delta) := \mathbb{E} [ \sup_{(s,t) \in T_{\delta}} | X(t) - X(s)|]$, where $T_{\delta} = \{ (s,t) : d(s,t) \leq \delta \}$.
Then for every $\varepsilon > 0$,
\begin{align*}
&\sup_{x \in \mathbb{R}} \mathbb{P} (| \sup_{t \in T} X(t) -x| \leq \varepsilon) \\
&\quad \leq \inf_{\delta,r > 0} \left \{ 2(1/\underline{\sigma})(\varepsilon + \phi(\delta) + r\delta) (\sqrt{2 \log N(T,d,\delta)} + 2) + e^{-r^{2}/2} \right \}.
\end{align*}
\end{lemma}
\qed
\end{remark}
\section{Auxiliary results for discretized processes}
\label{sec: auxiliary couplings}
This section states two auxiliary results for ``discretized'' processes that will be used to prove the theorems stated in Section \ref{sec: couplings}.
\begin{theorem}
\label{thm: fin dim main}
Let $X_1,\dots,X_n$ be independent random vectors in $\mathbb{R}^p$ ($p \geq 2$) with finite absolute third moments, that is, $\mathbb{E}[|X_{i j}|^3]<\infty$ for all $1\leq i\leq n$ and $1\leq j\leq p$. Define $\mu_i=\mathbb{E}[X_i]$ and $\tilde{X}_i=X_i-\mu_i$, $1\leq i\leq n$, and consider the statistic $Z=\max_{1\leq j\leq p}n^{-1/2}\sum_{i=1}^n X_{i j}$. Let $Y_1,\dots,Y_n$ be independent random vectors in $\mathbb{R}^p$ with $Y_i\sim N(\mu_i,\mathbb{E}[\tilde{X}_i \tilde{X}_i^T])$, and define $\tilde{Y}_i=Y_i-\mu_i$, $1\leq i\leq n$ and $\tilde{Z} = \max_{1 \leq j \leq p} n^{-1/2} \sum_{i=1}^{n} Y_{ij}$. Then for every $\delta>0$ and every Borel subset $A$ of $\mathbb{R}$, we have
\[
\mathbb{P} (Z \in A) \leq \mathbb{P}(\tilde{Z} \in A^{C_{7}\delta}) + \frac{C_8\log^2 p}{\delta^3 \sqrt{n}} \cdot \left \{ L_n+M_{n,X}(\delta)+M_{n,Y}(\delta) \right \},
\]
where $C_{7}, C_{8}$ are universal positive constants, and
\begin{align*}
&L_n=\max_{1\leq j\leq p}\frac{1}{n}\sum_{i=1}^n\mathbb{E}\left[|\tilde{X}_{i j}|^3\right],\\
&M_{n,X}(\delta)=\frac{1}{n}\sum_{i=1}^n \mathbb{E}\left[\max_{1\leq j\leq p}|\tilde{X}_{i j}|^3\cdot 1\left\{\max_{1\leq j\leq p}|\tilde{X}_{i j}|>\delta\sqrt{n}/\log p\right\}\right], \\
&M_{n,Y}(\delta)=\frac{1}{n}\sum_{i=1}^n \mathbb{E}\left[\max_{1\leq j\leq p}|\tilde{Y}_{i j}|^3\cdot 1\left\{\max_{1\leq j\leq p}|\tilde{Y}_{i j}|>\delta\sqrt{n}/\log p\right\}\right].
\end{align*}
\end{theorem}
\begin{theorem}
\label{thm: mb finite dimensional}
Let $X=(X_1,\dots,X_p)^{T}$ and $Y=(Y_1,\dots,Y_p)^{T}$ be random vectors in $\mathbb{R}^p$ ($p \geq 2$) with $X\sim N(\mu,\Sigma^{X})$ and $Y\sim N(\mu,\Sigma^{Y})$.
Let $\Delta = \max_{1\leq j,k\leq p}|\Sigma_{jk}^{X} - \Sigma^{Y}_{jk}|$, where $\Sigma_{jk}^{X}$ and $\Sigma_{jk}^{X}$ denote the $(j,k)$-th elements of $\Sigma^{X}$ and $\Sigma^{Y}$, respectively.
Define $Z=\max_{1\leq j\leq p}X_j$ and $\tilde{Z} = \max_{1\leq j\leq p} Y_j$. Then for every $\delta>0$ and every Borel subset $A$ of $\mathbb{R}$,
\[
\mathbb{P} (Z \in A) \leq \mathbb{P}(\tilde{Z} \in A^{\delta}) + C_9\delta^{-1}\sqrt{\Delta \log p},
\]
where $C_{9} > 0$ is a universal constant.
\end{theorem}
\section{Proofs for Section \ref{sec: couplings}}
\label{sec: proofs}
Recall the definition of $K_{n}$:
\[
K_n = K_{n} (v,A,b,\sigma,B,\eta) = \log N_{B}(\eta) + v(\log n\vee\log (A b/\sigma)).
\]
\subsection{Proof of Theorem \ref{thm: inf dim GAR}}
The proof relies on the following form of Strassen's theorem.
\begin{lemma}[Strassen's theorem]\label{thm: strassen}
Let $\mu$ and $\nu$ be Borel probability measures on $\mathbb{R}$. Let $\varepsilon>0$ and $\delta>0$. Suppose that $\mu(A)\leq \nu(A^{\delta})+\varepsilon$ for every Borel subset $A$ of $\mathbb{R}$. Let $V$ be a random variable with distribution $\mu$. Then there is a random variable $W$ with distribution $\nu$ such that $\Pr(|V-W|>\delta)\leq \varepsilon$.
\end{lemma}
\begin{proof}[Proof of Lemma \ref{thm: strassen}]
See Lemma 4.1 in \cite{CCK1}.
\end{proof}
\begin{proof}[Proof of Theorem \ref{thm: inf dim GAR}]
By Strassen's theorem, it is sufficient to prove that for every Borel subset $A$ of $\mathbb{R}$,
\begin{equation}
\mathbb{P}(Z \in A) \leq \mathbb{P}\{ \tilde{Z} \in A^{C_{1} (\eta+\delta^{(1)}_{n})} \} + C_{2}(\gamma+n^{-1}), \label{eq: desired inequality1}
\end{equation}
where $\tilde{Z} = \sup_{f \in \mathcal{F}} (B(f)+G_{P}f)$. The rest of the proof is divided into several steps. In the following, $C$ denotes a positive constant that depends only on $q$; the value of $C$ may change from place to place.
\medskip
{\bf Step 1}.
The first step is to ``discretize'' the empirical and Gaussian processes.
To this end, take
\[
\varepsilon=\sigma/(b n^{1/2}), \ N=2\cdot N(\mathcal{F},e_P, \varepsilon b)\cdot N_B(\eta).
\]
Since $N(\mathcal{F},e_P, \varepsilon b) \leq (4A/\varepsilon)^{v}$ by approximation of $P$ by a finitely discrete probability measure and assumption (B), we have $\log N \leq CK_{n}$.
By definition, there exist $f_{1},\dots,f_{N} \in \mathcal{F}$ such that for every $f\in\mathcal{F}$, there exists $1\leq j\leq N$ with $e_P(f,f_j) < \varepsilon b$ and $|B(f)-B(f_j)|<\eta$.
Note that under the present assumption, the Gaussian process $G_{P}$ can be extended to the linear hull of $\mathcal{F}$ in such a way that $G_{P}$ has linear sample paths \citep[see][Theorem 3.1]{D99}.
Hence letting $\mathcal{F}_\varepsilon := \{f-g:f,g\in\mathcal{F}, e_P(f,g)<\varepsilon b\}$,
we conclude that
\begin{align*}
&0\leq \sup_{f\in\mathcal{F}}(B(f)+\mathbb{G}_n f)-\max_{1\leq j\leq N}(B(f_j)+\mathbb{G}_n f_j)\leq \eta+\|\mathbb{G}_n\|_{\mathcal{F}_\varepsilon}, \\
&0\leq \sup_{f\in\mathcal{F}}(B(f)+G_P f)-\max_{1\leq j\leq N}(B(f_j)+G_P f_j)\leq \eta+\|G_P\|_{\mathcal{F}_\varepsilon}.
\end{align*}
\medskip
{\bf Step 2}. Here we wish to show that
\begin{equation}
\mathbb{P} \{ \|G_P\|_{\mathcal{F}_\varepsilon} > C \sqrt{\sigma^2 K_n/n} \} \leq 2n^{-1}.
\end{equation}
This follows from the Borell-Sudakov-Tsirel'son inequality \citep[see][Proposition A.2.1]{VW96} complemented with Dudley's maximal inequality for Gaussian processes \citep[see][Corollary 2.2.8]{VW96}.
First, by the Borell-Sudakov-Tsirel'son inequality, we have
\[
\mathbb{P} \{ \|G_P\|_{\mathcal{F}_\varepsilon} > \mathbb{E}[\|G_P\|_{\mathcal{F}_\varepsilon}] + \varepsilon b \sqrt{2\log n} \} \leq 2n^{-1}.
\]
Second, by Dudley's maximal inequality together with the fact that $N(\mathcal{F}_{\varepsilon},e_{P},\tau) \leq N^{2}(\mathcal{F},e_{P},\tau/2) \leq (8Ab/\tau)^{2v}$, we have
\[
\mathbb{E}[\|G_P\|_{\mathcal{F}_\varepsilon}] \leq C \varepsilon b \sqrt{v \log (8Ab/\varepsilon)} \leq C \sqrt{\sigma^{2} K_{n}/n}.
\]
Combining these inequalities, together with the fact that $\log n \leq K_n$, leads to the desired inequality.
\medskip
{\bf Step 3}. We wish to show that
\begin{equation}
\label{eq: emp process bound Step 3 - 1}
\mathbb{P} \left \{ \|\mathbb{G}_n\|_{\mathcal{F}_\varepsilon} > C b K_n/(\gamma^{1/q}n^{1/2-1/q}) \right \} \leq \gamma.
\end{equation}
Applying Lemma \ref{concentration} with $\alpha=\gamma^{-1/q}$ and $t=\gamma^{-2/q}$ to $\mathcal{F}_{\varepsilon}$, we have with probability at least $1-\gamma$,
\[
\|\mathbb{G}_n\|_{\mathcal{F}_{\varepsilon}} \leq C \{ \gamma^{-1/q}\mathbb{E}[\|\mathbb{G}_n\|_{\mathcal{F}_\varepsilon}] + (\sigma_\varepsilon+n^{-1/2}\|M_\varepsilon\|_q)\gamma^{-1/q}+n^{-1/2}\|M_\varepsilon\|_2\gamma^{-1/q} \},
\]
where $\sigma_{\varepsilon} := \sup_{f\in\mathcal{F}_{\varepsilon}}(Pf^2)^{1/2}\leq \varepsilon b=\sigma/n^{1/2}$ and $M_{\varepsilon} := 2\max_{1\leq i\leq n}F(X_i)$.
Here $\|M_\varepsilon\|_2\leq \|M_\varepsilon\|_q \leq 2n^{1/q} b$. In addition, by Lemma \ref{cor: maximal}, we have
\[
\mathbb{E}[\|\mathbb{G}_n\|_{\mathcal{F}_{\varepsilon}}] \leq C \{ \sigma(K_n/n)^{1/2}+bK_n/n^{1/2-1/q} \}\leq Cb K_n/n^{1/2-1/q}.
\]
Combining these inequalities leads to (\ref{eq: emp process bound Step 3 - 1}).
\medskip
{\bf Step 4}. Let $Z^\varepsilon=\max_{1\leq j\leq N}(B(f_j)+\mathbb{G}_n f_j)$ and $\tilde{Z}^{\varepsilon} = \max_{1 \leq j \leq N} (B(f_{j}) + G_{P}(f_{j}))$. Here we apply Theorem \ref{thm: fin dim main} to show that whenever
\begin{equation}\label{eq: delta bound step 3 - 1}
\delta\geq 2c\sigma n^{-1/2}(\log N)^{3/2}\cdot(\log n)
\end{equation}
for some universal constant $c>0$, we have for every Borel subset $A$ of $\mathbb{R}$,
\begin{equation}\label{eq: Step 4 - 1}
\mathbb{P} (Z^\varepsilon \in A) \leq \mathbb{P}(\tilde{Z}^{\varepsilon} \in A^{C_7\delta}) + C \left ( \frac{b\sigma^2 K_n^2}{\delta^3\sqrt{n}} + \frac{b^q K_n^{q}}{\delta^q n^{q/2-1}} + \frac{1}{n} \right ).
\end{equation}
Let $\tilde{X}_{i}=(f_j(X_i)-Pf_j)_{1 \leq j \leq N}, 1 \leq i \leq n$, and let $\tilde{Y} = (G_{P}f_{j})_{1 \leq j \leq N}$.
Then as $\tilde{X}_{1},\dots,\tilde{X}_{n}$ are i.i.d.,
\begin{align*}
L_{n} &= \max_{1\leq j\leq N}\mathbb{E}[|\tilde{X}_{1 j}|^3] = \sup_{f \in \mathcal{F}}\mathbb{E}[|f(X)-Pf|^3] \leq 8 \sup_{f \in \mathcal{F}} P|f|^{3} \leq 8\sigma^{2} b, \\
M_{n,X}(\delta)
&=\mathbb{E}\left[\max_{1\leq j\leq N}|\tilde{X}_{1 j}|^3\cdot 1\left\{\max_{1\leq j\leq N}|\tilde{X}_{1 j}|>\delta\sqrt{n}/\log N\right\}\right]\\
&\leq \frac{\log^{q-3}N }{(\delta\sqrt{n})^{q-3}}\mathbb{E}\left[\max_{1\leq j\leq N}|\tilde{X}_{1 j}|^q\right] \leq \frac{2^{q} b^q\log^{q-3}N }{(\delta\sqrt{n})^{q-3}}.
\end{align*}
To bound $M_{n,Y}(\delta)$, let $\| \cdot \|_{\psi_{1}}$ denote the Orlicz norm associated with the Young modulus $\psi_{1}(x) = e^{x}-1$, that is, $\| \xi \|_{\psi_{1}} = \inf \{ u > 0 : \mathbb{E}[\psi_1 (|\xi|/u) ] \leq 1 \}$. Then it is routine to verify that there exists a universal constant $c > 0$ such that $\| \max_{1\leq j\leq N}|\tilde{Y}_{j}| \|_{\psi_{1}} \leq c\sigma \sqrt{\log N}$.
Hence, by Markov's inequality, for every $x > 0$,
\[
\mathbb{P} \left(\max_{1\leq j\leq N}|\tilde{Y}_{j}|>x \right) \leq 2\exp\left(-\frac{x}{c \sigma\sqrt{\log N}}\right).
\]
Therefore, by Lemma \ref{lem: truncated moment}, whenever $\delta\geq 2c\sigma n^{-1/2}(\log^{3/2}N)\cdot (\log n)$,
\begin{align*}
M_{n,Y}(\delta)
&=\mathbb{E}\left[\max_{1\leq j\leq N}|\tilde{Y}_{j}|^3\cdot 1\left\{\max_{1\leq j\leq N}|\tilde{Y}_{j}|>\delta\sqrt{n}/\log N \right\}\right]\\
&\leq 12(\delta\sqrt{n}/\log N + c\sigma\sqrt{\log N})^3\exp\left(-\frac{\delta\sqrt{n}}{c\sigma \log^{3/2}N}\right)\\
&\leq C n^{-2} (\delta\sqrt{n}/\log N)^3.
\end{align*}
Application of Theorem \ref{thm: fin dim main} with these bounds, together with the bound $\log N \leq CK_{n}$, leads to (\ref{eq: Step 4 - 1}).
\medskip
{\bf Step 5}. In the previous step, take
\[
\delta = C' \left \{ \frac{(b\sigma^2 K_n^2)^{1/3}}{\gamma^{1/3}n^{1/6}}+\frac{b K_n}{\gamma^{1/q}n^{1/2-1/q}}\right \},
\]
where $C' > 0$ is a large enough but universal constant.
It is easy to check that for this choice of $\delta$, (\ref{eq: delta bound step 3 - 1}) holds under the condition $K_n^3\leq n$.
Indeed, since $q\geq 4$, $b \geq \sigma$, $\log n \leq K_n$ and $\log N \leq C K_n$, we have $2c \sigma n^{-1/2}(\log^{3/2} N)\cdot (\log n) \leq C'\sigma K_n^{3/2}/n^{4/9} \leq C' b^{1/3}\sigma^{2/3}K_n^{2/3}/(\gamma^{1/3}n^{1/6})\leq \delta $. Therefore, by Step 3, we have for every Borel subset $A$ of $\mathbb{R}$,
\[
\mathbb{P} ( Z^{\varepsilon} \in A ) \leq \mathbb{P} (\tilde{Z}^{\varepsilon} \in A^{C_{7} \delta}) + C(\gamma + n^{-1}).
\]
The desired inequality (\ref{eq: desired inequality1}) thus follows from combining Steps 1-5.
\end{proof}
\subsection{Proof of Theorem \ref{thm: inf dim MB}}
The proof of Theorem \ref{thm: inf dim MB} relies on a conditional version of Strassen's theorem due to \cite{MP91}.
\begin{lemma}
\label{lem: conditional strassen}
Let $V$ be a real-valued random variable defined on a probability space $(\Omega,\mathcal{A},\mathbb{P})$, and let $\mathcal{C}$ be a countably generated sub $\sigma$-field of $\mathcal{A}$.
Assume that there exists a uniform random variable on $[0,1]$ independent of $\mathcal{C} \vee \sigma (V)$. Let $G(\cdot \mid \mathcal{C})$ be a regular conditional distribution on the Borel $\sigma$-field of $\mathbb{R}$ given $\mathcal{C}$, and suppose that for some $\delta > 0$ and $\varepsilon > 0$,
\[
\mathbb{E}\left[ \sup_{A} \{ \mathbb{P}(V \in A \mid \mathcal{C}) - G(A^{\delta} \mid \mathcal{C}) \} \right] \leq \varepsilon,
\]
where $\sup_{A}$ is taken over all Borel subsets $A$ of $\mathbb{R}$. Then there exists a random variable $W$ such that the conditional distribution of $W$ given $\mathcal{C}$ coincides with $G(\cdot \mid \mathcal{C})$, and moreover $\mathbb{P} (|V-W| > \delta) \leq \varepsilon$.
\end{lemma}
\begin{proof}
See Theorem 4 in \cite{MP91}.
\end{proof}
\begin{proof}[Proof of Theorem \ref{thm: inf dim MB}]
Here $C$ denotes a positive constant that depends only on $q$; the value of $C$ may change from place to place. In addition, to ease the notation, we write $a \lesssim b$ if $a \leq Cb$.
By Lemma \ref{lem: conditional strassen}, since $\sigma(X_{1}^{n})$ is countably generated by the construction of the probability space (in particular, recall that we have assumed that $S$ is a separable metric space), it is sufficient to find an event $E \in \sigma (X_{1}^{n})$ such that $\mathbb{P}(E) \geq 1-\gamma-n^{-1}$, and on this event, the inequality
\begin{equation}
\mathbb{P}( Z^{e} \in A \mid X_{1}^{n}) \leq \mathbb{P} \{ \tilde{Z} \in A^{C (\eta + \delta_{n}^{(2)})} \} + C (\gamma + n^{-1}) \label{eq: desired inequality2}
\end{equation}
holds for every Borel subset $A$ of $\mathbb{R}$, where $\tilde{Z} = \sup_{f \in \mathcal{F}} (B(f)+G_{P}f)$.
We first specify such an event, and then show that on this event, (\ref{eq: desired inequality2}) holds for every Borel subset $A$ of $\mathbb{R}$.
Applying Lemma \ref{concentration} with $\alpha=\gamma^{-1/q}$ and $t=(\gamma/2)^{-2/q}$ to $\mathcal{F}$, we have with probability at least $1-\gamma/2$,
\[
\|\mathbb{G}_n\|_{\mathcal{F}} \lesssim \gamma^{-1/q}\mathbb{E}[\|\mathbb{G}\|_{\mathcal{F}}] + (\sigma + n^{-1/2}\|M\|_q)\gamma^{-1/q}+n^{-1/2}\|M\|_2\gamma^{-1/q},
\]
where $M:=\max_{1\leq i\leq n}F(X_i)$ satisfies $\|M\|_2\leq \|M\|_q=(\mathbb{E}[|M|^q])^{1/q}\leq n^{1/q} b$. In addition, by Lemma \ref{cor: maximal},
\[
\mathbb{E}[\|\mathbb{G}_n\|_\mathcal{F}] \lesssim \sigma K_n^{1/2}+\|M\|_2K_n n^{-1/2}\leq \sigma K_n^{1/2} + b K_n n^{-1/2+1/q}.
\]
Hence with probability at least $1-\gamma/2$,
\begin{equation}\label{eq: event1}
\|\mathbb{G}_n\|_{\mathcal{F}} \lesssim \sigma K_n^{1/2}/\gamma^{1/q}+b K_n/(\gamma^{1/q}n^{1/2-1/q}).
\end{equation}
Moreover, applying Lemma \ref{concentration} again with $\alpha=\gamma^{-2/q}$ and $t=(\gamma/2)^{-4/q}$ to the class $\mathcal{F}\cdot\mathcal{F} := \{f\cdot g:f,g\in\mathcal{F}\}$, we have with probability at least $1-\gamma/2$,
\[
\|\mathbb{G}\|_{\mathcal{F}\cdot\mathcal{F}}\lesssim \gamma^{-2/q}\mathbb{E}[\|\mathbb{G}_n\|_{\mathcal{F}\cdot\mathcal{F}}]+(\bar{\sigma}+n^{-1/2} \|M^2\|_{q/2})\gamma^{-2/q}+n^{-1/2}\|M^2\|_2\gamma^{-2/q},
\]
where $\bar{\sigma}^2 := \sup_{f\in\mathcal{F}\cdot \mathcal{F}}P f^2 \leq \sup_{f\in\mathcal{F}}P f^4\leq b^2\sigma^2$.
In addition, $\| M^2\|_2\leq \|M^2\|_{q/2}=(\mathbb{E}[|M|^q])^{2/q}\leq n^{2/q} b^2$, and as shown in the proof of Corollary 2.2 in \cite{CCK1},
$\mathbb{E}[\|\mathbb{G}_n\|_{\mathcal{F}\cdot\mathcal{F}}]\lesssim b\sigma K_n^{1/2}+b^2K_n n^{-1/2+2/q}$.
Hence with probability at least $1-\gamma/2$,
\begin{equation}\label{eq: event2}
\|\mathbb{G}_n\|_{\mathcal{F}\cdot\mathcal{F}}\lesssim b\sigma K_n^{1/2}/\gamma^{2/q}+b^2K_n/(\gamma^{2/q}n^{1/2-2/q}).
\end{equation}
Finally, by Markov's inequality, with probability at least $1-n^{-1}$,
\begin{equation}\label{eq: event3}
\|F\|_{P_n,2}\leq n^{1/2} \|F\|_{P,2}.
\end{equation}
Define $E$ as the intersection of the events in (\ref{eq: event1}), (\ref{eq: event2}), and (\ref{eq: event3}). Then $E \in \sigma(X_{1}^{n})$ and $\mathbb{P}(E) \geq 1-\gamma-n^{-1}$.
The rest of the proof, which is divided into several steps, is devoted to proving (\ref{eq: desired inequality2}) for each fixed $X_{1},\dots,X_{n}$ satisfying (\ref{eq: event1})--(\ref{eq: event3}).
In the following, we use the notation introduced in Step 1 of the proof of Theorem \ref{thm: inf dim GAR}.
Then
\begin{align}
&0\leq \sup_{f\in\mathcal{F}}(B(f)+\mathbb{G}_n^e f)-\max_{1\leq j\leq N}(B(f_j)+\mathbb{G}_n^e f_j)\leq \eta+\|\mathbb{G}_n^e\|_{\mathcal{F}_\varepsilon},\label{eq: MB appr1}\\
&0\leq \sup_{f\in\mathcal{F}}(B(f)+G_P f)-\max_{1\leq j\leq N}(B(f_j)+G_P f_j)\leq \eta+\|G_P\|_{\mathcal{F}_\varepsilon}.\label{eq: MB appr2}
\end{align}
\medskip
{\bf Step 1}. By Step 2 of the proof of Theorem \ref{thm: inf dim GAR}, we have
\[
\mathbb{P}(\|G_P\|_{\mathcal{F}_\varepsilon} > C \sqrt{\sigma^2 K_n/n} ) \leq 2n^{-1}.
\]
{\bf Step 2}. Here we wish to show that on the event $E$,
\begin{equation}\label{eq: Step 2 - 2}
\mathbb{P} \left \{ \|\mathbb{G}_n^e\|_{\mathcal{F}_{\varepsilon}} > C \{ (b\sigma K_n^{3/2})^{1/2}/(\gamma^{1/q}n^{1/4})+b K_n/(\gamma^{1/q}n^{1/2-1/q}) \} \mid X_{1}^{n} \right \} \leq 2n^{-1}.
\end{equation}
Fix any $X_{1},\dots,X_{n}$ satisfying (\ref{eq: event1})--(\ref{eq: event3}). Let us write $(\mathcal{F}-\mathcal{F})^2:=\{(f-g)^2:f,g\in\mathcal{F}\}$.
Then observe that
\begin{align*}
\sigma_n^2&:=\sup_{f\in\mathcal{F}_\varepsilon} P_n f^2 \leq \sup_{f\in\mathcal{F}_{\varepsilon}} \mathbb{E}[f(X)^2]+n^{-1/2} \|\mathbb{G}_n\|_{(\mathcal{F}-\mathcal{F})^2} \\
&\lesssim (\varepsilon b)^2 +n^{-1/2} \|\mathbb{G}_n\|_{\mathcal{F}\cdot\mathcal{F}} \lesssim \sigma^2/n + b\sigma K_n^{1/2}/(\gamma^{2/q} n^{1/2})+b^2 K_n/(\gamma^{2/q} n^{1-2/q}) \\
&\lesssim b\sigma K_n^{1/2}/(\gamma^{2/q} n^{1/2})+b^2 K_n/(\gamma^{2/q} n^{1-2/q}),
\end{align*}
where in the second line, we used the inequality $\|\mathbb{G}_n\|_{(\mathcal{F}-\mathcal{F})^2} =\sup_{f,g\in \mathcal{F}}|\mathbb{G}_n(f-g)^2| \leq 4\|\mathbb{G}_n\|_{\mathcal{F}\cdot\mathcal{F}}$.
Now, note that conditional on $X_{1}^{n}$, $\mathbb{G}_n^e$ is a centered Gaussian process, and $\mathbb{E}[(\mathbb{G}_n^e f)^2 \mid X_{1}^{n}] \leq P_n f^2\leq \sigma_n^2$ for all $f \in \mathcal{F}_\varepsilon$.
Hence by the Borell-Sudakov-Tsirel'son inequality \citep[see][Proposition A.2.1]{VW96},
\[
\mathbb{P}\{ \|\mathbb{G}_n^e\|_{\mathcal{F}_\varepsilon} > \mathbb{E}[\|\mathbb{G}_n^e\|_{\mathcal{F}_\varepsilon} \mid X_{1}^{n}] + \sigma_n \sqrt{2\log n} \mid X_{1}^{n} \} \leq 2 n^{-1}.
\]
To bound $\mathbb{E}[\|\mathbb{G}_n^e\|_{\mathcal{F}_\varepsilon} \mid X_{1}^{n}]$, observe that
\begin{align*}
\|\mathbb{G}_n^e\|_{\mathcal{F}_\varepsilon}
&\leq \sup_{f\in\mathcal{F}_{\varepsilon}}\Big|\frac{1}{\sqrt{n}}\sum_{i=1}^n e_i f(X_i)\Big|+\sup_{f\in\mathcal{F}_{\varepsilon}}\Big|\frac{1}{\sqrt{n}}\sum_{i=1}^n e_i\cdot P_n f\Big| =:I+II.
\end{align*}
By Dudley's maximal inequality \citep[see][Corollary 2.2.8]{VW96}, together with the fact that $N(\mathcal{F}_{\varepsilon},e_{P_{n}}, 2\tau \| F \|_{P_{n},2}) \leq N^{2}(\mathcal{F},e_{P_{n}},\tau \| F \|_{P_{n},2}) \leq (A/\tau)^{2v}$, we have
\begin{align*}
\mathbb{E} [ I \mid X_{1}^{n} ] &\lesssim \int_{0}^{\sigma_{n} \vee (\sigma/n^{1/2})} \sqrt{1+\log N(\mathcal{F}_{\varepsilon},e_{P_{n}}, \tau)} d\tau \\
&\lesssim (\sigma_n\vee(\sigma/n^{1/2}))\sqrt{v\log(2n^{1/2} A\|F\|_{P_n,2}/\sigma)} \lesssim (\sigma_n\vee (\sigma/n^{1/2})) K_n^{1/2}.
\end{align*}
Meanwhile, since $\|P_n\|_{\mathcal{F}_\varepsilon}\leq \sigma_n$ by Jensen's inequality, we have
\[
\mathbb{E}[II \mid X_{1}^{n}] \leq \|P_n\|_{\mathcal{F}_\varepsilon}\cdot\mathbb{E}\left[\Big|\frac{1}{\sqrt{n}}\sum_{i=1}^n e_i\Big|\right]\lesssim \sigma_n.
\]
Combining these inequalities leads to (\ref{eq: Step 2 - 2}).
\medskip
{\bf Step 3}. Let $Z^{e,\varepsilon}=\max_{1\leq j\leq N}(B(f_j)+\mathbb{G}_n^{e} f_j)$ and $\tilde{Z}^{\varepsilon} = \max_{1\leq j\leq N}(B(f_j)+G_P f_j)$. We wish to show that on the event $E$, the inequality
\[
\mathbb{P} (Z^{e,\varepsilon} \in A \mid X_{1}^{n}) \leq \mathbb{P}(\tilde{Z}^{\varepsilon} \in A^{\delta}) + \frac{C}{\delta}\left\{ \frac{(b\sigma K_n^{3/2})^{1/2}}{\gamma^{1/q}n^{1/4}} + \frac{b K_n}{\gamma^{1/q}n^{1/2-1/q}}\right \}
\]
holds for every $\delta > 0$ and every Borel subset $A$ of $\mathbb{R}$.
Let
\[
\Delta := \max_{1\leq j,k\leq N}|\{ P_n (f_j f_k) - (P_n f_j) ( P_n f_k) \}- \{ P (f_j f_k) - (P f_j)(P f_k) \} |,
\]
and observe that
\begin{align*}
&|P_n (f_j f_k) - P (f_j f_k)| \leq n^{-1/2} \|\mathbb{G}_n\|_{\mathcal{F}\cdot\mathcal{F}}, \\
&|(P_n f_j) (P_n f_k)-(P f_j)(P f_k)| \lesssim n^{-1} \|\mathbb{G}_n\|_{\mathcal{F}}\cdot\|\mathbb{G}_n\|_{\mathcal{F}}+\sigma n^{-1/2} \|\mathbb{G}_n\|_{\mathcal{F}}.
\end{align*}
Hence as $K_n \leq n$, it is not difficult to check that on the event $E$,
\[
\Delta\lesssim b\sigma K_n^{1/2}/(\gamma^{2/q}n^{1/2})+b^2 K_n/(\gamma^{2/q}n^{1-2/q}).
\]
The assertion of this step now follows from Theorem \ref{thm: mb finite dimensional} (recall $\log N \lesssim K_{n}$).
\medskip
{\bf Step 4}. Take
\[
\delta=\delta_n^{(2)} = \frac{(b\sigma K_n^{3/2})^{1/2}}{\gamma^{1 + 1/q} n^{1/4}} + \frac{b K_n}{\gamma^{1 + 1/q} n^{1/2-1/q}}.
\]
Then the desired inequality (\ref{eq: desired inequality2}) (with suitable $C_{3},C_{4}$) follows from combining (\ref{eq: MB appr1}), (\ref{eq: MB appr2}), Steps 1,2, and 3 with this choice of $\delta$.
\end{proof}
\subsection{Proof of Theorem \ref{thm: inf dim EB}}
Here $C$ denotes a positive constant depending only on $q$; $C$ may change from place to place. In addition, to ease the notation, we write $a\lesssim b$ if $a \leq Cb$. In the proof below, we find an event $E\in\sigma(X_1^n)$ such that $\mathbb{P}(E)\geq 1-\gamma-n^{-1}$, and on this event, the inequality
\begin{equation}\label{eq: desired inequality3}
\mathbb{P}(Z^*\in A \mid X_1^n)\leq \mathbb{P}\{Z^e\in A^{C(\eta+\delta_n^{(3)})} \mid X_1^n\} + C(\gamma + n^{-1})
\end{equation}
holds for every Borel subset $A$ of $\mathbb{R}$ where $Z^e=\sup_{f\in\mathcal{F}}(B(f)+\mathbb{G}_n^e f)$. Combining this inequality with (\ref{eq: desired inequality2}), which is established in the proof of Theorem \ref{thm: inf dim MB} (and which holds on a possibly different event $E'\in\sigma(X_1^n)$ satisfying $\mathbb{P}(E')\geq 1-\gamma - n^{-1}$), the proof is completed by applying Lemma \ref{lem: conditional strassen}.
We first specify the event $E$. We use the same notation as introduced in Step 1 of the proof of Theorem \ref{thm: inf dim GAR}. Then
\begin{align}
&0\leq \sup_{f\in\mathcal{F}}(B(f)+\mathbb{G}_n^* f) - \max_{1\leq j\leq N}(B(f_j) - \mathbb{G}_n^* f_j) \leq \eta + \|\mathbb{G}_n^*\|_{\mathcal{F}_\varepsilon},\label{eq: EB approximation1}\\
&0\leq \sup_{f\in\mathcal{F}}(B(f)+\mathbb{G}_n^e f) - \max_{1\leq j\leq N}(B(f_j) - \mathbb{G}_n^e f_j) \leq \eta + \|\mathbb{G}_n^e\|_{\mathcal{F}_\varepsilon}.\label{eq: EB approximation2}
\end{align}
In addition, as in the proof of Theorem \ref{thm: inf dim MB}, with probability at least $1-\gamma/4$,
\begin{equation}
\label{eq: EB event1}
\|\mathbb{G}_n\|_\mathcal{F} \lesssim \sigma K_n^{1/2}/\gamma^{1/q}+b K_n/(\gamma^{1/q}n^{1/2-1/q});
\end{equation}
with probability at least $1-\gamma/4$,
\begin{equation}
\label{eq: EB event2}
\|\mathbb{G}_n\|_{\mathcal{F}\cdot\mathcal{F}} \lesssim b\sigma K_n^{1/2}/(\gamma^{2/q})+b^2K_n/(\gamma^{2/q}n^{1/2-2/q}),
\end{equation}
and with probability at least $1-n^{-1}$,
\begin{equation}\label{eq: EB event3}
\|F\|_{P_n,2}\leq n^{1/2}\|F\|_{P,2}.
\end{equation}
Here $\mathcal{F}\cdot\mathcal{F}=\{f\cdot g:f,g\in\mathcal{F}\}$. Moreover, by the triangle inequality,
\[
\max_{1\leq j\leq N}\sum_{i=1}^n|f_j(X_i) - P_n f_j|^3 \lesssim \max_{1\leq j\leq N}\sum_{i=1}^n|f_j(X_i)|^3
\]
and applying Lemma \ref{lem: deviation ineq nonnegative}, we have with probability at least $1-\gamma/4$,
\[
\max_{1\leq j\leq N}\sum_{i=1}^n|f_j(X_i)|^3 \lesssim \mathbb{E}\left[\max_{1\leq j\leq N}\sum_{i=1}^n |f_j(X_i)|^3\right] + \gamma^{-3/q}\|M^3\|_{q/3},
\]
where $M := \max_{1\leq i\leq n}\max_{1\leq j\leq N}|f_j(X_i)|\leq \max_{1\leq i\leq n}F(X_i)$ is such that $\|M^3\|_{q/3}\lesssim n^{3/q}b^3$. In addition, by Lemma \ref{lem: maximal ineq nonnegative},
\[
\mathbb{E}\left[\max_{1\leq j\leq N}\sum_{i=1}^n |f_j(X_i)|^3\right] \lesssim n\sigma^2 b+\mathbb{E}[M^3]\log N\lesssim n\sigma^2 b+n^{3/q}b^3K_n.
\]
Therefore, with probability at least $1-\gamma/4$,
\begin{equation}\label{eq: EB event4}
\max_{1\leq j\leq N}\sum_{i=1}^n |f_j(X_i) - P_n f_j|^3/n \lesssim \sigma^2 b+b^3 K_n/(\gamma^{3/q} n^{1-3/q}).
\end{equation}
Finally, by Markov's inequality, with probability at least $1-\gamma/4$,
\begin{equation}\label{eq: EB event5}
\max_{1\leq i\leq n}\max_{1\leq j\leq N}|f_j(X_i)-P_n f_j|\lesssim \max_{1\leq i\leq n}F(X_i) \lesssim \gamma^{-1/q}n^{1/q}b.
\end{equation}
Define $E$ as the intersection of the events in (\ref{eq: EB event1})-(\ref{eq: EB event5}). Then $E\in\sigma(X_1^n)$ and $\mathbb{P}(E)\geq 1- \gamma - n^{-1}$. In the rest of the proof, which is divided into several steps, we prove (\ref{eq: desired inequality3}) for each fixed $X_1,\dots,X_n$ satisfying (\ref{eq: EB event1})--(\ref{eq: EB event5}).
\medskip
{\bf Step 1}. By Step 2 in the proof of Theorem \ref{thm: inf dim MB}, on the event $E$,
\[
\mathbb{P}\left\{ \|\mathbb{G}_n^e\|_{\mathcal{F}_{\varepsilon}}> C \{ (b\sigma K_n^{3/2})^{1/2}/(\gamma^{1/q}n^{1/4})+b K_n/(\gamma^{1/q}n^{1/2-1/q}) \} \mid X_{1}^{n} \right \} \leq 2n^{-1}.
\]
{\bf Step 2}. Here we wish to show that on the event $E$,
\begin{equation}
\label{eq: Step 2 - 3}
\mathbb{P}\left\{\|\mathbb{G}_n^*\|_{\mathcal{F}_{\varepsilon}}> C\{ (b\sigma K_n^{3/2})^{1/2}/(\gamma^{1/q}n^{1/4})+ b K_n/(\gamma^{1/q} n^{1/2-1/q}) \} \mid X_{1}^{n} \right\} \leq n^{-1}.
\end{equation}
Note that conditional on $X_1^n$, $\mathbb{G}_n^*$ is the empirical process associated with $n$ i.i.d. observations from the empirical distribution $P_n$. When restricted to the domain $\{X_1,\dots,X_n\}$, the class of functions $\mathcal{F}$ has a constant envelope $\max_{1\leq i\leq n}F(X_i) \lesssim \gamma^{-1/q}n^{1/q}b$.
Moreover, by the same arguments as those used in Step 2 of the proof of Theorem \ref{thm: inf dim MB},
\[
\sigma_n^2 :=\sup_{f\in\mathcal{F}_\varepsilon}P_n f^2 \lesssim b\sigma K_n^{1/2}/(\gamma^{2/q}n^{1/2}) + b^2 K_n/(\gamma^{2/q} n^{1-2/q}).
\]
Hence the inequality (\ref{eq: Step 2 - 3}) follows from application of Talagrand's inequality (Lemma \ref{lem: talagrand inequality}) with $t=\log n$.
\medskip
{\bf Step 3}. Let $Z^{*,\varepsilon} = \max_{1\leq j\leq N}(B(f_j) + \mathbb{G}_n^* f_j)$ and $Z^{e,\varepsilon} = \max_{1\leq j\leq N} (B(f_j) + \mathbb{G}_n^e f_j)$. Here we apply Theorem \ref{thm: fin dim main} to show that whenever
\begin{equation}\label{eq: delta requirement 3}
\delta\geq C\left(\frac{b\log N}{\gamma^{1/q} n^{1/2-1/q}} + \frac{\sigma(\log^{3/2} N)\cdot (\log n)}{n^{1/2}}\right)
\end{equation}
for some sufficiently large $C>0$, on the event $E$, the inequality
\begin{equation*}
\mathbb{P}(Z^{*,\varepsilon}\in A \mid X_{1}^{n} )\leq \mathbb{P}(Z^{e,\varepsilon}\in A^{C\delta} \mid X_{1}^{n}) + C\left( \frac{b \sigma^2 K_n^2}{\delta^3n^{1/2}} + \frac{b^3 K_n^3}{\delta^3 \gamma^{3/q}n^{3/2-3/q}} + \frac{1}{n} \right)
\end{equation*}
holds for every $\delta > 0$ and every Borel subset $A$ of $\mathbb{R}$.
Let $\widetilde{X}_i = (f_j(X_i) - P_n f_j)_{1\leq j\leq N}$, $1\leq i\leq n$, and let $\widetilde{Y} = (\mathbb{G}_n^e f_{j})_{1\leq j\leq N}$.
Then
\begin{align*}
L_n&=\max_{1\leq j\leq N}\sum_{i=1}^n |\tilde{X}_{i j}|^3/n \lesssim \sigma^2 b+b^3 K_n/(\gamma^{3/q} n^{1-3/q}), \\
M_{n,X}(\delta)&=n^{-1} \sum_{i=1}^n\max_{1\leq j\leq N}|\tilde{X}_{i j}|^3\cdot 1\left\{\max_{1\leq j\leq N}|\tilde{X}_{i j}|>\delta\sqrt{n}/\log N\right\}=0.
\end{align*}
The last equality follows from (\ref{eq: EB event5}) since $\delta\sqrt{n}/\log N\geq C\gamma^{-1/q}n^{1/q}b$. Moreover, $\mathbb{E}[\tilde Y_j^2]\leq P_n f_j^2 \leq \sigma^2 + n^{-1/2}\|\mathbb{G}_n\|_{\mathcal F\cdot \mathcal F}$ for all $1\leq j\leq N$, and so by the same argument as that used in Step 4 of the proof of Theorem \ref{thm: inf dim GAR}, we have
\begin{align*}
M_{n,Y}(\delta)&=\mathbb{E} \left[ \max_{1\leq j\leq N}|\tilde{Y}_{j}|^3\cdot 1\left\{\max_{1\leq j\leq N}|\tilde{Y}_{j}|>\delta\sqrt{n}/\log N\right\} \mid X_1^n \right]\\
& \lesssim n^{-2}(\delta\sqrt{n}/\log N)^3,
\end{align*}
since $\delta\geq C(\sigma^2 + n^{-1/2}\|\mathbb{G}_n\|_{\mathcal F\cdot \mathcal F})^{1/2} n^{-1/2}(\log^{3/2} N)\cdot(\log n)$ for sufficiently large $C$.
The assertion of this step then follows from Theorem \ref{thm: fin dim main}.
\medskip
{\bf Step 4}. In the previous step, take
\[
\delta = C'\left\{\frac{(b\sigma^2 K_n^2)^{1/3}}{\gamma^{1/3} n^{1/6}} + \frac{b K_n}{\gamma^{1/3 + 1/q}n^{1/2-1/q}}\right\}
\]
where $C' > 0$ is a large constant that can be chosen to depend only on $q$. It is not difficult to check that for this choice of $\delta$, (\ref{eq: delta requirement 3}) holds under the condition $K_n^3\leq n$. The desired inequality (\ref{eq: desired inequality3}) then follows from combining (\ref{eq: EB approximation1}), (\ref{eq: EB approximation2}), Steps 1, 2, and 3 with this choice of $\delta$.
\qed
\subsection{Proof of Lemma \ref{lem: AC for nonzero mean}}
We begin with proving the following lemma.
\begin{lemma}
\label{lem: AC nonzero mean fin dim}
Let $X=(X_{1},\dots,X_{p})^{T}$ be a possibly non-centered Gaussian random vector with $\sigma_{j}^{2} := \Var (X_{j}) > 0, 1 \leq j \leq p$.
Then for every $\varepsilon > 0$,
\[
\sup_{t \in \mathbb{R}} \mathbb{P} (| \max_{1 \leq j \leq p} X_{j} -t| \leq \varepsilon) \leq \frac{2\varepsilon}{\underline{\sigma}} (\sqrt{2 \log p} + 2),
\]
where $\underline{\sigma} = \min_{1 \leq j \leq p} \sigma_{j}$.
\end{lemma}
The lemma follows from the following result due essentially to Nazarov \cite{Nazarov03}; see also \cite{Klivans08}.
\begin{lemma}[Nazarov's inequality]
\label{lem: Nazarov}
Let $W$ be a standard Gaussian random vector in $\mathbb{R}^{m}$, that is, $W \sim N(0,I)$. Let $A \subset \mathbb{R}^{m}$ be the intersection of $p$ half-spaces (a half-space in $\mathbb{R}^{m}$ is the set of form $\{ w \in \mathbb{R}^{m} : \alpha^{T} w \leq t \}$ for some $\alpha \in \mathbb{R}^{m}$ with $\| \alpha \| = 1$ and $t \in \mathbb{R}$). Then
\[
\lim_{\delta \downarrow 0} \frac{1}{\delta} \mathbb{P} (W \in A^{\delta} \backslash A) \leq \sqrt{2\log p}+2,
\]
where the limit on the left-hand side exists.
\end{lemma}
\begin{proof}[Proof of Lemma \ref{lem: AC nonzero mean fin dim}]
It is clear that the distribution of $\max_{1 \leq j \leq p} X_{j}$ is absolutely continuous, so let $f(\cdot)$ denote its density.
Let $W$ be a standard Gaussian random vector in $\mathbb{R}^{p}$, and let $\mu = (\mu_1,\dots,\mu_p)^{T}= {\mathrm{E}} [X]$ and $\Sigma = {\mathrm{E}}[(X-\mu)(X-\mu)^{T}]$.
Then $X \stackrel{d}{=} \Sigma^{1/2}W+\mu$, so that denoting by $\sigma_{j}a_{j}^{T}$ (where $a_{j} \in \mathbb{R}^{p}$ with $\| a_j \| = 1$) the $j$-th row of $\Sigma^{1/2}$, we obtain
\[
\max_{1 \leq j \leq p} (\Sigma^{1/2}W+\mu)_{j} \leq t \Leftrightarrow a_{j}^{T}W \leq (t-\mu_{j})/\sigma_{j}, 1 \leq \forall j \leq p.
\]
Let $A_{t} = \{ w \in \mathbb{R}^{p} : a_{j}^{T} w \leq (t-\mu_{j})/\sigma_{j}, 1 \leq \forall j \leq p \}$ for $t \in \mathbb{R}$, and observe that
\[
f(t) = \lim_{\varepsilon \downarrow 0} \frac{1}{\varepsilon} \mathbb{P} (W \in A_{t+\varepsilon} \backslash A_{t}) \quad a.e. \ t \in \mathbb{R}.
\]
Moreover, since
\[
A_{t+\varepsilon} \subset \{ w \in \mathbb{R}^{p} : a_{j}^{T} w \leq (t-\mu_{j})/\sigma_{j} + \varepsilon/\underline{\sigma}, 1 \leq \forall j \leq p \},
\]
we have by Lemma \ref{lem: Nazarov},
\[
\frac{1}{\varepsilon} \mathbb{P} (W \in A_{t+\varepsilon} \backslash A_{t}) \leq \frac{1}{\varepsilon}\mathbb{P}(W \in A^{\varepsilon/\underline{\sigma}}_{t} \backslash A_{t}) + o(1) \leq \frac{1}{\underline{\sigma}} (\sqrt{2 \log p} + 2) + o(1), \ \varepsilon \downarrow 0,
\]
which leads to $f(t) \leq (1/\underline{\sigma}) (\sqrt{2\log p} + 2)$ a.e.
\end{proof}
We are now in position to prove Lemma \ref{lem: AC for nonzero mean}.
\begin{proof}[Proof of Lemma \ref{lem: AC for nonzero mean}]
Pick any $\delta > 0$, and let $\{ t_{1},\dots,t_{N} \}$ be a $\delta$-net of $(T,d)$ with $N=N(T,d,\delta)$.
Then
\[
| \sup_{t \in T} X(t) - \max_{1 \leq j \leq N} X(t_{j}) | \leq \sup_{(s,t) \in T_{\delta}} | X(t) - X(s) | =: \zeta,
\]
so that for every $x \in \mathbb{R}, \varepsilon, r' > 0$,
\[
\mathbb{P} (| \sup_{t \in T} X(t) -x| \leq \varepsilon) \leq \mathbb{P} (| \sup_{1 \leq j \leq N} X(t_{j}) -x| \leq \varepsilon + r') + \mathbb{P} ( \zeta > r' ).
\]
By Lemma \ref{lem: AC nonzero mean fin dim}, the first term on the right-hand side is bounded by
\[
2(1/\underline{\sigma})(\varepsilon + r') (\sqrt{2 \log N} + 2).
\]
On the other hand, by the Borell-Sudakov-Tsirel'son inequality, for every $r > 0$,
\[
\mathbb{P} ( \zeta > \mathbb{E} [\zeta] + r\delta) \leq e^{-r^{2}/2}.
\]
By taking $r' = \mathbb{E} [\zeta] + r\delta= \phi(\delta) + r\delta$, we obtain the desired conclusion.
\end{proof}
\section{Proofs for Section \ref{sec: auxiliary couplings}}
\label{sec: proofs auxiliary couplings}
We begin with proving the following lemma.
\begin{lemma}
\label{thm: smooth approximation}
Let $\delta>0$. For every Borel subset $A$ of $\mathbb{R}$, there exists a smooth function $g:\mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}$ such that $\| g' \|_{\infty}\leq\delta^{-1}, \| g'' \|_{\infty}\leq K\delta^{-2}, \| g'''\|_{\infty} \leq K\delta^{-3}$, where $K$ is an absolute constant, and $1_A(t)\leq g(t)\leq 1_{A^{3\delta}}(t)$ for all $t\in \mathbb{R}$.
\end{lemma}
\begin{proof}
The proof is essentially similar to that of Lemma 18 in Chapter 10 of \cite{P02} with the exception that we employ a compactly supported smoother. Let $\rho$ denote the Euclidean distance on $\mathbb{R}$, and consider the function $h(t)=(1-\rho(t,A^\delta)/\delta)_{+}$. Observe that $h$ is a bounded Lipschitz function with Lipschitz constant $\delta$. Let $\varphi:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ be the function defined by $\varphi(t)=C\exp(1/(t^2-1))$ for $|t|\leq 1$ and $\varphi(t)=0$ for $|t|>1$, where the constant $C$ is chosen in such a way that $\int_{\mathbb{R}}\varphi(t)dt=1$. Note that $\varphi$ is infinitely differentiable with support $[-1,1]$. Define $g:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ by
\[
g(t)=\int_{\mathbb{R}}h(t+\delta z)\varphi(z)dz = \delta^{-1}\int_{\mathbb{R}}h(y)\varphi(\delta^{-1}(y-t))dy.
\]
Then it is routine to verify that $g$ is infinitely differentiable and $\| g' \|_{\infty} \leq \delta^{-1}, \| g'' \|_{\infty} \leq K \delta^{-2}, \| g''' \|_{\infty} \leq K\delta^{-3}$.
In addition, for $t\in A$, $h(t+\delta z)=1$ if $|z|\leq 1$, and $\varphi(z)=0$ if $|z|>1$. Hence $1_A(t) \leq g(t)$. Meanwhile, for $t \notin A^{3\delta}$, $h(t+\delta z)=0$ if $|z| \leq 1$, and $\varphi(z)=0$ if $|z|>1$. Hence $g(t)\leq 1_{A^{3\delta}}(t)$.
\end{proof}
\begin{proof}[Proof of Theorem \ref{thm: fin dim main}]
Here we write $a \lesssim b$ if there exists a universal constant $C > 0$ such that $a \leq Cb$.
Fix $\delta>0$, and let $\beta=\delta^{-1}\log p$. Since $p\geq 2$, we have $1/\delta\lesssim \beta$. Let $A$ be a Borel subset of $\mathbb{R}$. Letting $e_\beta=\beta^{-1}\log p(=\delta)$ and using Lemma \ref{thm: smooth approximation}, we can construct a smooth function $g:\mathbb{R}\to \mathbb{R}$ such that $\|g'\|_\infty\leq \delta^{-1}$, $\|g''\|_\infty\leq K\delta^{-2}$, $\|g'''\|_\infty\leq K\delta^{-3}$ for some absolute constant $K > 0$, and $1_{A^{e_\beta}}(t)\leq g(t)\leq 1_{A^{e_\beta+3\delta}}(t)$ for all $t \in \mathbb{R}$.
In addition, let $\bar{\mu}=\sum_{i=1}^n \mu_i$ and consider the function $F_\beta:\mathbb{R}^p\to \mathbb{R}$ defined by $F_\beta(x)=\beta^{-1}\log(\sum_{j=1}^p e^{\beta(x_j+\bar{\mu}_j)}), \ x\in\mathbb{R}^p$. Then it is seen that
$\max_{1\leq j\leq p}x_j\leq F_\beta(x-\bar{\mu})\leq \max_{1\leq j\leq p}x_j+e_\beta$ for all $x \in \mathbb{R}^{p}$.
Hence
\begin{equation}
\label{eq: starting inequality}
\mathbb{P}(Z\in A)\leq \mathbb{P}\left(F_\beta\left(n^{-1/2}\textstyle{\sum_{i=1}^n} \tilde{X}_i\right)\in A^{e_\beta}\right).
\end{equation}
Next, let $m = g \circ F_{\beta}$. Then, as in the proof of Lemma 5.1 in \cite{CCK3} (see also \cite{C05a, C05b}), there exist functions $U_{j k l}:\mathbb{R}^p\to \mathbb{R}, \ 1\leq j,k,l\leq p$ such that
\begin{align*}
&|\partial_j\partial_k\partial_l m(x)|\leq U_{j k l}(x), \ \forall x \in \mathbb{R}^{p}, \\
&\textstyle{\sum_{j,k,l=1}^p} U_{j k l}(x)\lesssim (\delta^{-3}+\beta\delta^{-2}+\beta^2\delta^{-1})\lesssim \beta^2\delta^{-1}, \ \forall x \in \mathbb{R}^{p}, \\
&U_{j k l}(x)\lesssim U_{j k l}(x+y)\lesssim U_{j k l}(x), \ \forall x,y \in \mathbb{R}^{p} \ \text{with} \ \max_{1 \leq j \leq p} |y_{j}| \leq \beta^{-1}.
\end{align*}
Hence proceeding as in Step 1 of the proof of Lemma 5.1 in \cite{CCK3} and observing that the term $\int_0^1 \omega(t)\mathbb{E}[h(Z^{(n)},6)]dt$ in that paper is trivially bounded by a universal constant, one can show that for some universal constant $c> 0$,
\begin{align*}
&\left | \mathbb{E} \left [ m\left (n^{-1/2} {\textstyle \sum}_{i=1}^n \tilde{X}_i \right )\right]-\mathbb{E} \left [ m\left (n^{-1/2} {\textstyle \sum}_{i=1}^n \tilde{Y}_i \right )\right] \right |\\
&\quad \lesssim \frac{\log^2 p}{\delta^3 \sqrt{n}}\cdot \{ L_n+M_{n,X}(c\delta)+M_{n,Y}(c\delta) \} =: I,
\end{align*}
which implies that for some universal constant $C$,
\begin{align*}
&\mathbb{P}\left(F_\beta\left(n^{-1/2}\textstyle{\sum_{i=1}^n} \tilde{X}_i\right)\in A^{e_\beta}\right) \leq \mathbb{E}\left[m\left(n^{-1/2}\textstyle{\sum_{i=1}^n}\tilde{X}_i\right)\right] \\
&\leq \mathbb{E}\left[m\left(n^{-1/2}\textstyle{\sum_{i=1}^n}\tilde{Y}_i\right)\right] + C I \leq \mathbb{P}\left\{ F_\beta\left(n^{-1/2}\textstyle{\sum_{i=1}^n} \tilde{Y}_i\right)\in A^{e_\beta+3\delta}\right \} + C I \\
&\leq \mathbb{P}\left(\tilde{Z}\in A^{2e_\beta+3\delta}\right)+C I.
\end{align*}
Combining this inequality with (\ref{eq: starting inequality}) leads to the conclusion of the theorem.
\end{proof}
\begin{proof}[Proof of Theorem \ref{thm: mb finite dimensional}]
Since $p\geq 2$, the assertion is trivial if $\Delta/\delta^2>1$. Therefore, throughout the proof, we will assume that $\Delta/\delta^2\leq 1$. Let $\beta>0$, and define $F_\beta:\mathbb{R}^p\to \mathbb{R}$ by $F_\beta(x)=\beta^{-1}\log(\sum_{j=1}^p e^{\beta(x_j+\mu_j)})$ where $x=(x_1,\dots,x_p)^{T}$ and $\mu=(\mu_1,\dots,\mu_p)^{T}$. As in the proof of Theorem \ref{thm: fin dim main}, it can be shown that for every $g\in C^2(\mathbb{R})$, the function $m = g \circ F_{\beta}$ satisfies the inequality
\[
\sum_{j,k=1}^p |\partial_j\partial_k m(x)|\leq \|g''\|_\infty+2\|g'\|_\infty \beta
\]
for all $x\in \mathbb{R}^p$.
Hence using the same arguments as those used in the proof of Theorem 1 and Comment 1 in \cite{CCK2} with $X$ and $Y$ replaced by $X-\mu$ and $Y-\mu$, respectively, we have
\[
\left|\mathbb{E}\left[g\left(\max_{1\leq j\leq p}X_j\right)\right]-\mathbb{E}\left[g\left(\max_{1\leq j\leq p}Y_j\right)\right]\right|\leq \|g''\|_\infty \Delta/2+2\|g'\|_\infty \sqrt{2\Delta\log p}.
\]
Now, take any Borel subset $A$ of $\mathbb{R}$. By Lemma \ref{thm: smooth approximation}, we can construct a function $g\in C^2(\mathbb{R})$ such that $\|g'\|_\infty\leq \delta^{-1}$ and $\|g''\|_\infty\leq K\delta^{-2}$ for some absolute constant $K$, and $1_A(t)\leq g(t)\leq 1_{A^{3\delta}}(t)$ for all $t\in\mathbb{R}$.
For this $g$ and some absolute constant $C$, we have
\begin{align*}
&\mathbb{P}\Big(\max_{1\leq j\leq p}X_j\in A\Big)\leq \mathbb{E}\Big[g\Big(\max_{1\leq j\leq p}X_j\Big)\Big] \\
&\quad \leq \mathbb{E}\Big[g\Big(\max_{1\leq j\leq p}Y_j\Big)\Big]+C(\Delta\delta^{-2}+\delta^{-1}\sqrt{\Delta\log p})\\
&\quad \leq \mathbb{P}\Big(\max_{1\leq j\leq p}Y_j\in A^{3\delta}\Big)+C(\Delta\delta^{-2}+\delta^{-1}\sqrt{\Delta\log p})\\
&\quad \leq \mathbb{P}\Big(\max_{1\leq j\leq p}Y_j\in A^{3\delta}\Big)+C\sqrt{(\Delta/\delta^2)\log p}
\end{align*}
where the last line follows from the fact that $\Delta/\delta^2\leq 1$ and $p\geq 2$.
The conclusion of the theorem follows from replacing $\delta$ by $\delta/3$.
\end{proof}
\section{Some technical tools}
\label{sec: technical tools}
\begin{lemma}
\label{concentration}
Let $X_1,\dots,X_n$ be i.i.d. random variables taking values in a measurable space $(S,\mathcal{S})$ with common distribution $P$. Let $\mathcal{F}$ be a pointwise measurable class of functions $f:S\to \mathbb{R}$, to which a measurable envelope $F$ is attached. Consider the empirical process $\mathbb{G}_n f=n^{-1/2}\sum_{i=1}^n (f(X_i)-Pf)$, $f\in\mathcal{F}$. Let $\sigma^2>0$ be a constant such that $\sup_{f\in\mathcal{F}}P f^2\leq \sigma^2\leq \|F\|_{P,2}^2$. Let $M=\max_{1\leq i\leq n} F(X_i)$. Suppose that $F \in \mathcal{L}^{q} ( P )$ for some $q \geq 2$. Then for every $t \geq 1$, with probability $> 1-t^{-q/2}$,
\begin{multline*}
\| \mathbb{G}_{n} \|_{\mathcal{F}} \leq (1+\alpha) \mathbb{E} [ \| \mathbb{G}_{n} \|_{\mathcal{F}} ] +K_{q} \Big \{ (\sigma + n^{-1/2} \| M \|_{q}) \sqrt{t} \\
+ \alpha^{-1} n^{-1/2} \| M \|_{2}t \Big \}, \ \forall \alpha > 0,
\end{multline*}
where $K_{q}> 0$ is a constant that depends only $q$.
\end{lemma}
\begin{proof}
The lemma is essentially due to \cite{BBLM05}, Theorem 12. See Theorem 5.1 in \cite{CCK1} for the version stated here.
\end{proof}
\begin{lemma}
\label{cor: maximal}
Consider the setting of Lemma \ref{concentration}. In addition, suppose that there exist constants $A \geq e$ and $v \geq 1$ such that $\sup_{Q} N(\mathcal{F},e_{Q},\varepsilon \| F \|_{Q,2}) \leq (A/\varepsilon)^{v}, \ 0 < \varepsilon \leq 1$.
Then
\begin{equation*}
\mathbb{E} [ \| \mathbb{G}_{n} \|_{\mathcal{F}} ] \leq K \left \{ \sqrt{v\sigma^{2} \log \left ( \frac{A \| F \|_{P,2}}{\sigma} \right ) } + \frac{v\| M \|_{2}}{\sqrt{n}} \log \left ( \frac{A \| F \|_{P,2}}{\sigma} \right ) \right \},
\end{equation*}
where $K$ is an absolute constant.
\end{lemma}
\begin{proof}
See Corollary 5.1 in \cite{CCK1}.
\end{proof}
\begin{lemma}[Talagrand's inequality]
\label{lem: talagrand inequality}
Consider the setting of Lemma \ref{cor: maximal}, but suppose now that the envelope $F$ is bounded by a constant $b > 0$, and let $\sigma^2 > 0$ be a constant such that $\sup_{f\in \mathcal{F}}Pf^2\leq \sigma^2\leq b^2$. If $b^2v\log(Ab/\sigma)\leq n\sigma^2$, then for every $0 < t \leq n\sigma^2/b^2$,
\[
\mathbb{P}\left\{ \|\mathbb{G}_n\|_{\mathcal{F}}>K\sigma \sqrt{t\vee(v\log(Ab/\sigma)}\right \} \leq e^{-t},
\]
where $K$ is an absolute constant.
\end{lemma}
\begin{proof}
This form of Talagrand's inequality is taken from Theorem B.1 in \cite{CCK4}; the original references go back to \cite{T96}, \cite{M00}, and \cite{GG01}.
\end{proof}
\begin{lemma}
\label{lem: maximal ineq nonnegative}
Let $X_1,\dots,X_n$ be independent random vectors in $\mathbb{R}^p$ with $p\geq 2$ such that $X_{ij} \geq 0$ for all $i=1,\dots,n$ and $j=1,\dots,p$. Define $Z := \max_{1 \leq j \leq p} \sum_{i=1}^{n} X_{ij}$ and $M := \max_{1 \leq i \leq n} \max_{1 \leq j \leq p} X_{ij} $. Then
\[
{\mathrm{E}} [Z] \leq K \left( \max_{1\leq j\leq p}{\mathrm{E}} [ {\textstyle \sum}_{i=1}^n X_{ij} ]+{\mathrm{E}} [M] \log p \right),
\]
where $K$ is an absolute constant.
\end{lemma}
\begin{proof}
See Lemma 9 in \cite{CCK2}.
\end{proof}
\begin{lemma}
\label{lem: deviation ineq nonnegative}
Assume the setting of Lemma \ref{lem: maximal ineq nonnegative}. Then
for every $\eta > 0, s \geq 1$ and $t > 0$,
\[
\Pr ( Z \geq (1+\eta) {\mathrm{E}}[Z] + t ) \leq K {\mathrm{E}}[M^{s}]/t^{s},
\]
where $K = K(\eta,s)$ is a constant that depends only on $\eta,s$.
\end{lemma}
\begin{proof}
See Lemma A.5 in \cite{CCK3}.
\end{proof}
\begin{lemma}
\label{lem: truncated moment}
Let $\xi$ be a nonnegative random variable such that $\Pr(\xi >x)\leq A e^{-x/B}$ for all $x>0$ and for some constants $A, B>0$. Then for every $t>0$, ${\mathrm{E}}[\xi ^31\{\xi >t\}]\leq 6A(t+B)^3e^{-t/B}$.
\end{lemma}
\begin{proof}
See Lemma A.8 in \cite{CCK3}.
\end{proof}
\section*{Acknowledgments}
We would like thank an anonymous referee for valuable comments that helped improve upon the quality of the paper. K. Kato is supported by the Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) (15K03392) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science. V. Chernozhukov is supported by a grant from the National Science Foundation.
\section*{References}
|
\section{Introduction}
\lettrine[lines=2]{A}{rtificial} neural networks (ANNs) are complex networks imitating the way human cerebral neurons process information to realize parallel information transformation and processing. ANNs have been widely employed to solve real life problems related to classification, function approximation, data processing, and robotics. The training algorithm used to determine various parameters of ANN is one of the key factors that influence the performance of ANNs. Among all training algorithms, backpropagation (BP) has been widely used, but it suffers from the problem that it is easy to get stuck in the local optima, and its low convergence speed \cite{CKGoh2008}\cite{XinYao1997}. With the advancement of evolutionary algorithms (EAs), they are employed to train ANNs. Moreover, an EA can simultaneously optimize the weights of an ANN and it can also evolve the structure of the network so as to achieve desirable performance \cite{KStanley2002}.
With different levels of EA involvement, EA-based ANNs can be classified into two major types: ``noninvasive" and ``invasive". The former refers to those methods using EA to evolve network structure in conjunction with BP for weight adaptation. The latter includes those using EA for both evolving network structure and weight adaptation \cite{PPPalmes2005}. Due to the tradition of employing BP for network weight training, ``noninvasive" methods have been widely studied and many algorithms have been developed with outstanding performance \cite{FLeung2003}\cite{PACastillo1999}. Since they rely heavily on BP, they still suffer from the problems of getting stuck in local optima and low convergence speed \cite{MGori1992}.
The ``invasive" methods, however, merely depend on EA for evolving the network. Thus the computation speed is higher than ``noninvasive" methods since the ``invasive" methods can avoid BP fitness evaluation with direct representation of networks. In this paper, we propose a new algorithm based on Chemical Reaction Optimization (CRO) \cite{AYSLam2010} to evolve the network structure and to tune the weights of networks.
CRO is a novel chemical reaction-inspired general purpose optimization algorithm. It is a variable population-based metaheuristics, mimicking the transition of molecules and intermolecular interactions in a chemical reaction. The transitions and interactions tend to direct molecules toward the lowest potential energy states on the potential energy surface (PES). Thus CRO uses the idea of mimicking the objective function landscape with PES and molecules can explore the solution space to find the global optimum due to this tendency. CRO has been proved to be effective in solving many practical problems \cite{AYSLam2010}\cite{AYSLam2010b}\cite{JinXu2010} and simulation results show that ANNs trained by CRO outperform other EAs in many classification problems.
The rest of the paper is organized as follows. In Section II, we briefly present the related work of using EA to train ANNs. In Section III, the problem formulation is presented. The detailed framework and the algorithm based on CRO is given in Section IV. Section V presents the simulation results comparing CRO-based ANNs (CROANN) with other ANNs. Finally we conclude the paper in Section VI.
\section{Related Work}
Using EA to train ANNs has become an active research topic. Many EAs, e.g. genetic algorithm (GA) \cite{JTTsai2006}, simulated annealing (SA) \cite{TBLudermir2006}, and particle swarm optimization (PSO) \cite{JianboYu2007} have been used. Yet relatively few ``invasive" methods have been studied to achieve the best performance of EA-based neural networks. Sexton \textit{et al.} used Tabu Search (TS) for neural network training \cite{RSSexton1998}, where TS was used to train a fixed neural network with six hidden layer neurons. The TS solution is given in the form of vectors representing all the weights of the network. The testing data set was a collection of randomly generated two-dimensional points $(x,y)$ where $x\in \lbrack -100,100]$ and $y\in \lbrack -10,10]$. The output data set was generated by simple mathematical functions. The result demonstrated that TS-based networks could outperform conventional BP-derived networks. SA and GA were also implemented for the same data set \cite{RSSexton1999}.
Angeline \textit{et al.} proposed GeNeralized Acquisition of Recurrent Links (GNARL) using hybrid-GA to train ANNs \cite{PJAngeline1994}. Instead of using symmetric topology, GNARL employs sparse connections of neural networks to represent the network structures. GNARL uses a mutation operation to evolve the structure and to tune the weights of networks. GNARL reserves the top 50\% individuals in each generation, according to the user-defined fitness function, and performs reproduction by two types of mutation methods: parametric mutation and structural mutation. The former mutation method changes the network by perturbing the weights with Gaussian noise controlled by an annealing temperature \cite {SKirk1984}, while the latter mutation method involves the addition or deletion of hidden layer nodes or links.
A Constructive algorithm for training Cooperative Neural Network Ensembles (CNNE), proposed by M. Islam \textit{et al.} \cite{MIslam2003}, uses a constructive algorithm to evolve neural networks. CNNE relies on the contribution of individuals in the population and uses incremental learning to maintain the diversity among individuals in an ensemble. Incremental learning based on negative correlation could effectively reduce the redundancy generated by individuals searching the same solution space and thus different individuals could learn different aspect of the training data, which could result in a final solution of the ensemble. CNNE is a ``noninvasive" method which relies on proper implementation of BP. Though CNNE minimizes optimization problems by utilization of ensembles, it suffers from the ``structural climbing problem" \cite{PJAngeline1994}.
S. He \textit{et al.} proposed a Group Search Optimizer-based ANN (GSOANN) \cite{SHe2009}, which uses Group Search Optimizer, a population-based optimization algorithm inspired by animal social foraging behavior, to train the networks with least-squared error function as the fitness function.
Paulito P. Palmes \textit{et al.} proposed mutation-based genetic neural network (MGNN) employing a specially designed mutation strategy to perturb the chromosomes representing neural networks \cite{PPPalmes2005}. MGNN is very similar to GNARL except that it implements selection, encoding, mutation, fitness function, and stopping criteria differently. MGNN's encoding scheme contributes to a flexible formulation of fitness function and mutation strategy of local adaptation of evolutionary programming, and it implements a stopping criteria using ``sliding window" to track the state of overfitness.
\section{Problem Formulation}
In this paper, we consider the problem of single-hidden-layer feedforward neural network (SLFN\footnote{SLFN is the original abbreviation used in \cite{CKGoh2008} to refer to a ``single-hidden-layer feedforward neural network".}) design for data classification. We use a topological structure, activation functions of nodes, and connection weights to describe an SLFN. We use $l\in[0,1,2]$ to distinguish the different layers, where Layer 0 to 2 are the input layer, the hidden layer, and the output layer, respectively. $n_{l}$ stands for the number of neurons in Layer $l$. $w_{k,pq}$ represents the weight of the connection between the $p^{th}$ neuron in Layer $k-1$ to the $q^{th}$ neuron in Layer $k$. $b_{k,p}$ stands for the bias of the $p^{th}$ neurons in Layer $k$. Fig. 1 depicts an example of SLFN. In the problem dataset $S$ with $|S|$ samples, the $i^{th}$ sample $i$ is composed of a pattern $S_{i}$ and the corresponding desired output $R_{i}$, where $i=1,2,...,|S|$. Thus we use $s_{i,m}$ to describe the $m^{th}$ element of the $i^{th}$ pattern, and $r_{i,q}$ to denote the $q^{th}$ element of the $i^{th}$ desired outputs in the dataset. With a given SLFN and a pattern $S_{i}$, the computed result $c_{i,q}$ can be obtained from the following formula
\begin{equation}
c_{i,q}=f_{2}(\sum_{p=1}^{n_{1}}(w_{2,pq}\times f_{1}(\sum_{m=1}^{n_{0}}(w_{1,mp}\times s_{i,m})+b_{1,p}))+b_{2,q}) \label{classR}
\end{equation}
where $f_{1}$ and $f_{2}$ are the activation functions for hidden layer neurons and output neurons, respectively. For a trained SLFN, we can make use of the difference between $R_{i}$ and $C_{i}$ to evaluate the performance of the network.
\begin{figure}[t]
\centering
\includegraphics{fig1.eps}
\caption{Single-hidden-layer Feedforward Neural Network}
\end{figure}
The primary function to evaluate the performance of a conventional BP network is the mean squared error (MSE) between $R_{i}$ and $C_{i}$. A small MSE means that the performance is good and the network is well-trained. However, in order to concentrate more on the accuracy of the classification result, here we adopt a new fitness function $f_{fitness}$ (\ref{Ffit}) consisting of the normalized mean squared error (NMSE) $f_{NMSE}$ (\ref{Fnmse}) and the classification percentage error $f_{percent}$ (\ref{Fpercent}). Their formulas are given as follows:
\begin{equation}
f_{fitness}=\alpha \times f_{NMSE}+\beta \times f_{percent} \label{Ffit}
\end{equation}
\begin{equation}
f_{NMSE}=\frac{100}{n_{2}S}\times \sum_{i=1}^{|S|}\sum_{q=1}^{n_{2}}\left(r_{i,q}-c_{i,q}\right) ^{2} \label{Fnmse}
\end{equation}
\begin{equation}
f_{percent}=100\times \left( 1-\frac{correct}{total}\right) \label{Fpercent}
\end{equation}
In (\ref{Ffit}), $\alpha $ and $\beta $ are user-defined parameters to balance the weighting on (\ref{Fnmse}) and (\ref{Fpercent}) in the ultimate fitness function and should be set to a small real value between 0 and 1. For instance, implementations stressing classification correctness can set $\alpha =1$ and $\beta =0.7$. In this paper, we also use this setting in the simulation.
For CROANN, we divide the samples in a dataset into a training set, a validation set, and a testing set. We first determine the best \{$w_{1,mp},w_{2,pq},b_{1,p},b_{2,q}$\} quadlet with the training set according to (\ref{Ffit}). Then we use the validation set to detect and avoid overfitness (See Section IV.D). Since ANNs should have the ability to process unfamiliar data, we use the testing set to evaluate the accuracy of classification and compare the results with other algorithms.
\section{Algorithm Design}
In this section, we first discuss how CRO works. Then we introduce the encoding scheme and operators employed to train the structure and weights of networks for CROANN. Finally the stopping criteria is given.
\subsection{Chemical Reaction Optimization}
CRO is a population-based metaheuristic inspired by chemical reactions, mimicking the process of reactions where molecules collide with the walls of the container and with each other. In the process, molecules attempt to reach the stable state. Imagine we put a certain number of molecules in a closed container. At the start of reaction, molecules with excess energy are unstable. Since there is a natural tendency for a reacting system to stay in a stable state, molecules change their energy state from high to low through a sequence of elementary reactions. When the reaction stops, we can get molecules with the minimum stable state of energy. If we consider different energy states as an energy surface, the transition and interaction of molecules can result in a gradual rolling down process on PES and the lowest point is the minimum stable state of energy. We call the initial molecules ``reactants" and the final ``products".
In CRO, each molecule has a molecular structure, representing a solution of the problem, and two kinds of energy, i.e. potential energy (PE) and kinetic energy (KE). PE stands for the fitness function value and KE describes the tolerance of a molecule to an increase of its energy state. Suppose $\omega $ and $f$ are a molecular structure and the fitness function, respectively, then we compute its PE with $PE_{\omega }=f\left( \omega \right) $. If $\omega ^{\prime }$ is the new structure derived from $\omega $ in an elementary reaction, then $PE_{\omega }+KE_{\omega }>PE_{\omega ^{\prime }}$ has to be satisfied. Otherwise, the reaction is invalid and the new structure should be rejected. In other words, KE represents the ability for a molecule to escape from a local minimum. This rule can also be easily applied to intermolecular elementary reactions and changes may be more vigorous since more KE can be transformed into PE. A central energy buffer is set up for energy conservation and convergence.
We define four types of elementary reactions for CRO, namely, on-wall ineffective collision, decomposition, inter-molecular ineffective collision, and synthesis. These four elementary reactions are defined to cover all possible reactions under the framework of CRO. These four types can be classified into two classes: uni-molecular reactions include the first two types and inter-molecular reactions include the latter two. A uni-molecular reaction can be triggered when a single molecule collides on a wall of the container. An inter-molecular reaction happens when two or more molecules collide with each other (for simplicity, only two molecules are considered in this class of reactions). Interested readers can refer to \cite{AYSLam2010} for the pseudocode of CRO.
\subsection{Encoding}
To accelerate the simulation and to reduce the difficulty in programming, we use two matrices and two vectors to represent different weights and thresholds. This scheme is similar to that described in \cite{PPPalmes2005} with one key difference. In \cite{PPPalmes2005}, there is an extra element in each solution which controls the perturbation strength, but we abandon it since CRO uses one constant parameter to control the Gaussian perturbation. We call the complete collection of these matrices and vectors a ``solution structure". Every molecule has a solution structure representing the network structure and determining the current energy state the molecule is at.
\subsection{Operators}
\subsubsection{Initial Solution Generator{}}
This operator is designed to generate a new structure of networks randomly. Each call will generate a new solution structure. It is achieved by first assigning random numbers to all elements and then scaling them to [-1.0, 1.0] linearly. Its pseudocode is given in Algorithm 1 below:
\begin{algorithm}
\caption{\sc{InitialGen} ($\omega$)}
\begin{algorithmic}[1]
\ForAll{Matrices and vectors $m$ in $\omega$}
\ForAll{Elements $e$ in $m$}
\State Randomly generate a real number $n$
\State $e=n$
\EndFor
\ForAll{Elements $e$ in $m$}
\State $e=2*(e-min(m))/(max(m)-min(m))-1$
\EndFor
\EndFor
\end{algorithmic}
\end{algorithm}
\subsubsection{Neighbor Generator}
This operator is designed to generate a new solution $\omega ^{^{\prime }}$ from a given solution $\omega $. Its main purpose is to perform a local search for better solutions. It is done by perturbing one random element in the matrices or vectors in $\omega $ with Gaussian perturbation, whose mean is the original number and variation is a user-defined value. Its pseudocode is given in Algorithm 2 where $\rho $ stands for Gaussian perturbation function and $v$ is a user-defined variance.
\begin{algorithm}
\caption{\sc{Neighbour} ($\omega$)}
\begin{algorithmic}[1]
\State Generate a random integer $i$ smaller than the total number of elements in a solution
\State Find the $i^{th}$ element $e$ in $\omega$
\State $e=e+\rho(e, v)$
\end{algorithmic}
\end{algorithm}
\subsubsection{Decomposition}
This operator is used to generate two different solutions $\omega _{1}^{^{\prime }}$ and $\omega _{2}^{^{\prime }}$ based on a given solution $\omega $. This operator can help molecules jump out of local minimums by performing severe perturbation on the solution. It is done by perturbing every element in the matrices and vectors in $\omega $ with Gaussian perturbation probabilistically, say 50\%. If, though unlikely to happen, nothing is changed during the first stage of the perturbation, this solution will be perturbed by the Neighbor Generator function. Its pseudocode is given in Algorithm 3 and the variables are as defined in the previous section.
\begin{algorithm}
\caption{\sc{Decomposition} ($\omega$)}
\begin{algorithmic}[1]
\State $change=false$
\State Copy $\omega$ to $\omega_{1}^{'}$ and $\omega_{2}^{'}$
\ForAll{Matrices and vectors $m$ in $\omega_{1}^{'}$ and $\omega_{2}^{'}$}
\ForAll{Elements $e$ in $m$}
\State Generate a real $r$ between 0 and 1
\If{$r>0.5$}
\State $e=e+\rho(e, v)$
\State $change=true$
\EndIf
\EndFor
\If{$change\neq true$}
$neighbour($the original $\omega_{1}^{'}$ or $\omega_{2}^{'})$
\EndIf
\EndFor
\end{algorithmic}
\end{algorithm}
\subsubsection{Synthesis}
This operator is used to generate a new solution $\omega ^{^{\prime }}$ based on two given solutions $\omega _{1}$ and $\omega _{2}$. It is done by randomly choosing elements from both solutions with equal possibilities to form a new solution. Its pseudocode is given in Algorithm 4.
\begin{algorithm}
\caption{\sc{Synthesis} ($\omega_{1}$, $\omega_{2}$)}
\begin{algorithmic}[1]
\ForAll{Matrices and vectors $m$ in $\omega^{'}$}
\ForAll{Elements $e$ in $m$}
\State Generate a real $r$ between 0 and 1
\If{$r>0.5$}
\State $e=$counterpart in $m_{1}$
\Else
\State $e=$counterpart in $m_{2}$
\EndIf
\EndFor
\EndFor
\end{algorithmic}
\end{algorithm}
\subsection{Stopping Criteria}
We introduce two stopping criteria to CROANN: maximum function evaluations (FE) and overfitness detection. The maximum FE criterion is a hard limit of CROANN and no simulation could evaluate the fitness function more than this threshold. The design of the other stopping criterion, overfitness detection, is based on the observation that good performance with the training samples may not necessarily result in a good performance with the testing samples. Poor overall performance might be obtained due to over-training the system in the training phase. To address this problem, we employ a ``sliding window" to monitor the presence of overfitness in the network. CROANN measures the validation performance of the current best network $ValFitness_{i}$ and compares this performance with the previous best validation performance using $ValBest_{i-1}=min(ValFitness_{j},\forall j<i)$ at the end of $i^{th}$ window. If the previous validation performance is better, then we say this network is ``overfitting" and add 1 to the overfitness counter. When this overfitness counter reaches a user-defined threshold, CROANN will terminate. However, once $ValBest_{i}$ is smaller than $ValFitness_{i-1}$, the overfitness counter is reset to zero. The pseudocode describing the stopping criteria is given in Algorithm 5 below:
\begin{algorithm}
\caption{\sc{Stopping Criteria} ($ValBest$, $CurrentNet$)}
\begin{algorithmic}[1]
\If{Current FE exceeds maximum FE}
\State CROANN stop
\EndIf
\State Calculate the validation performance $ValFitness$
\If{$ValFitness<ValBest$}
\State $overFitCount=0$
\State $ValBest=ValFitness$
\State Store $CurrentNet$
\Else
\State $overFitCount++$
\If{$overFitCount>overFitThres$}
\State Restore the saved best network
\State CROANN stop
\EndIf
\EndIf
\end{algorithmic}
\end{algorithm}
\section{Simulation Results}
\begin{figure*}
\centering
\mbox{\subfigure{
\begin{minipage}[t]{0.33\textwidth}
\includegraphics[width=1\textwidth]{fig2a.eps} \\\\
\includegraphics[width=1\textwidth]{fig2d.eps} \\\\
\includegraphics[width=1\textwidth]{fig2g.eps}
\end{minipage}}
\subfigure{
\begin{minipage}[t]{0.33\textwidth}
\includegraphics[width=1\textwidth]{fig2b.eps} \\\\
\includegraphics[width=1\textwidth]{fig2e.eps} \\\\
\includegraphics[width=1\textwidth]{fig2h.eps}
\end{minipage}}
\subfigure{
\begin{minipage}[t]{0.33\textwidth}
\includegraphics[width=1\textwidth]{fig2c.eps} \\\\
\includegraphics[width=1\textwidth]{fig2f.eps}
\end{minipage}}}
\caption{Impact of CRO Parameters on Average Error Rate of Classification}
\end{figure*}
In order to evaluate the performance of CROANN, the simulation is implemented with C++ and tested with some famous classification datasets from the UCI repository \cite{FrankA2010}: \textit{Iris} classification dataset, \textit{Wisconsin breast cancer} classification dataset and \textit{Pima Indians diabetes} dataset. They are all derived from real-world problems. The Iris dataset is a standard benchmark for evaluating the performance of ANNs and has been tested by many neural network algorithms, including some EA-based ANNs algorithm. The latter two datasets are used to test the ability of CROANN to recover from polluted data \cite{XinYao1997}. The datasets are partitioned based on the suggestion given by Prechelt \cite{Prechelt1994}. Each of them is separated into three classes: training class, validation class and testing class with the ratio of 2:1:1 using the simple random sampling method. First, several tests are conducted to evaluate the impact of changes in different CRO parameters, using the \textit{Iris} classification dataset as benchmark. Then CROANN is compared with other EA-based ANN algorithms proposed in the recent literature to evaluate the performance.
\subsection{Analysis of the impact of CROANN parameters}
The ratio of occurrence for different elementary reactions of CRO and the initial size of energy buffer have direct impact on the final performance of the neural network. So it is essential to analyze their impact in order to adjust them for later use. The first experiment includes a set of tests on different CRO parameter values, based on the \textit{Iris} dataset, a benchmark test for machine learning and pattern recognition. When investigating one parameter, other parameters are set constant. Results of each test are generated by averaging the error rate of testing set in 50 trials. The analysis results are shown in Fig. 2.
Results show that a Gaussian perturbation variance which is too large makes CRO scan through the solution space in a relatively large scale but can not explore small regions carefully while a variance which is too small is likely to result in getting stuck in local optima. Similarly, a small population can not let the molecules fully explore the solution space, while a large population will reduce the possibility of reaction occurrence of individual molecules. Initial energy buffer size, initial molecular kinetic energy, and kinetic energy loss rate control the overall energy in the whole system. They also cooperate with molecular collision rate, thresholds for decomposition and synthesis to control the ratio of occurrence for different elementary reactions of CRO to a proper value.
\subsection{Comparing CROANN with other EA-based ANN algorithms}
\begin{table}
\caption{CROANN Parameters}
\small
\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{r||l|l|l}
\hline\hline
\multirow{2}{*}{Parameter} & \multicolumn{3}{c}{Value} \\ \cline{2-4}
& Iris & Cancer & Diabetes \\ \hline\hline
Function Evaluation Limit & 50 000 & 50 000 & 172 800 \\
Max Window Count & 300 & 300 & 500 \\ \hline
Gaussian Perturbation Variance & \multicolumn{3}{c}{0.1} \\
Initial Population Size & \multicolumn{3}{c}{20} \\
Initial Energy Buffer Size & \multicolumn{3}{c}{0.0} \\
Initial Molecular Kinetic Energy & \multicolumn{3}{c}{100.0} \\
Molecular Collision Rate & \multicolumn{3}{c}{0.1} \\
Kinetic Energy Loss Rate & \multicolumn{3}{c}{0.1} \\
Decomposition Threshold & \multicolumn{3}{c}{300} \\
Synthesis Threshold & \multicolumn{3}{c}{500} \\
Number of Trials & \multicolumn{3}{c}{50} \\
Window Size & \multicolumn{3}{c}{100} \\ \hline\hline
\end{tabular}%
\end{center}
\end{table}
\begin{table*}
\caption{Error Rate (\%) of CROANN and Other ANNs of the Iris Dataset}
\small
\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{r||llll||llll||llll}
\hline\hline
\multirow{2}{*}{Algorithm} & \multicolumn{4}{c||}{Training Set} & \multicolumn{4}{c||}{Validation Set} & \multicolumn{4}{c}{Testing Set} \\ \cline{2-13}
& Mean & Std. & Min & Max & Mean & Std. & Min & Max & Mean & Std. & Min & Max \\ \hline\hline
CROANN & 2.00 & 3.68 & 0.00 & 5.33 & 4.32 & 2.16 & 2.70 & 8.10 & \textbf{1.31} & 1.77 & 0.00 & 7.89 \\
SGAANN & 16.24 & 5.92 & 7.21 & 30.23 & - & - & - & - & 14.20 & 8.82 & 0.00 & 36.00 \\
EPANN & 18.54 & 6.47 & 7.69 & 29.77 & - & - & - & - & 12.56 & 8.42 & 0.00 & 32.00 \\
ESANN & 14.47 & 5.25 & 6.97 & 27.43 & - & - & - & - & 7.08 & 6.40 & 0.00 & 26.00 \\
PSOANN & 13.27 & 5.39 & 7.38 & 25.84 & - & - & - & - & 10.38 & 9.36 & 0.00 & 32.00 \\
GSOANN & 12.03 & 1.60 & 8.63 & 15.36 & - & - & - & - & 3.52 & 2.27 & 0.00 & 8.00 \\
MGNN & - & - & - & - & - & - & - & - & 4.68 & - & - & - \\ \hline\hline
\end{tabular}
\end{center}
\end{table*}
\begin{table*}
\caption{Comparison between CROANN and Other Machine Learning Algorithms of the Iris Dataset}
\small
\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{r|lllll}
\hline
Algorithm & CROANN & GANet-best \cite{ECantuPaz2005} & SVM-best \cite{TVGestel2004} & CCSS \cite{SDzeroski2004} & \\ \hline
Error Rate & \textbf{1.31} & 6.40 & 1.40 & 4.40 & \\ \hline
\end{tabular}
\end{center}
\end{table*}
\begin{table*}
\caption{Error Rate (\%) of CROANN and Other ANNs of the Wisconsin Breast-Cancer Dataset}
\small
\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{r||llll||llll||llll}
\hline\hline
\multirow{2}{*}{Algorithm} & \multicolumn{4}{c||}{Training Set} & \multicolumn{4}{c||}{Validation Set} & \multicolumn{4}{c}{Testing Set} \\ \cline{2-13}
& Mean & Std. & Min & Max & Mean & Std. & Min & Max & Mean & Std. & Min & Max \\ \hline\hline
CROANN & 3.89 & 0.72 & 3.21 & 5.61 & 3.54 & 0.42 & 2.86 & 4.00 & 1.06 & 0.67 & 0.00 & 2.29 \\
SGAANN & 3.88 & 0.63 & 3.04 & 5.63 & 3.86 & 1.14 & 2.59 & 7.82 & 1.50 & 0.72 & 0.00 & 2.85 \\
EPANN & 3.58 & 0.63 & 3.03 & 6.18 & 3.30 & 1.45 & 1.85 & 8.99 & 1.54 & 1.16 & 0.57 & 6.29 \\
ESANN & 2.98 & 0.11 & 2.73 & 3.16 & 2.70 & 0.39 & 2.14 & 3.52 & 0.95 & 0.66 & 0.00 & 2.86 \\
PSOANN & 3.26 & 0.24 & 2.92 & 3.80 & 2.37 & 0.43 & 1.37 & 3.35 & 1.24 & 2.02 & 0.00 & 11.43\\
GSOANN & 3.35 & 0.09 & 3.26 & 3.56 & 2.17 & 0.21 & 1.93 & 2.89 & \textbf{0.65} & 1.42 & 0.00 & 1.14\\
MGNN & - & - & - & - & - & - & - & - & 3.05 & - & - & -\\ \hline\hline
\end{tabular}
\end{center}
\end{table*}
\begin{table*}
\caption{Comparison between CROANN and Other Machine Learning Algorithms of the Wisconsin Breast Cancer Dataset}
\small
\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{r|llllllll}
\hline
Algorithm & CROANN & GANet-best \cite{ECantuPaz2005} & SVM-best \cite{TVGestel2004} & CCSS \cite{SDzeroski2004} & COOP \cite{NGPedrajas2005} & CNNE \cite{MIslam2003} & EPNet \cite{XinYao1997} & EDTs \cite{TGDirt2000} \\ \hline
Error Rate & \textbf{1.06} & \textbf{1.06} & 3.10 & 2.72 & 1.23 & 1.20 & 1.38 & 2.63 \\ \hline
\end{tabular}%
\end{center}
\end{table*}
For comparison, we employ six EA-based training algorithms, namely simple genetic algorithm (SGA) ANNs \cite{JH1975}, evolutionary programming (EP) ANNs \cite{LJFogel1965}\cite{DBFogel1995}, evolutionary strategies (ES) ANNs \cite{HPSchwefel1995}, particle swarm optimizer (PSO) ANN \cite{JKennedy1995}, mutation-based neural networks (MGNN) \cite{PPPalmes2005}, and group search optimizer (GSO) ANNs \cite{SHe2009}. We also compare CROANN with some other sophisticated or hybrid machine learning algorithms further to check whether CROANN can be competitive with them. Since there is no agreement on the maximum number of FEs in the previous literature, the maximum number of FEs for the first two datasets is set to 50 000 according to the average maximum FEs given in \cite{PPPalmes2005}, while for the third dataset, it is set to 172 800 according to \cite{SHe2009}. Other CRO parameters are determined based on the analysis in the previous section. Table I gives the collection of CROANN parameters in the simulation.
\subsubsection{Iris Dataset}
The Iris dataset is the most widely-used benchmark for machine learning and pattern recognition. The whole dataset can be divided into three different classes of iris species: \textit{Setosa}, \textit{Versicolour} and \textit{Verginica}. The species of iris can be determined by four attributes of the plants: \textit{sepal length}, \textit{sepal width}, \textit{petal length} and \textit{petal width}. The dataset is divided into three parts: 75 training samples, 37 validation samples and 38 testing samples.
Results generated by CROANN, averaged over 50 trials, and those of six other ANNs are displayed in Table II. It is easy to see that CROANN outperforms all other EA-based ANNs dramatically, in both training error and testing error. The comparison with recent machine learning algorithms in the literature is listed in Table III. CROANN also generates the best result among these algorithms.
\subsubsection{Wisconsin Breast Cancer Dataset}
\begin{table*}
\caption{Error Rate (\%) of CROANN and Other ANNs of the Pima Indian Diabetes Dataset}
\small
\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{r||llll||llll||llll}
\hline\hline
\multirow{2}{*}{Algorithm} & \multicolumn{4}{c||}{Training Set} & \multicolumn{4}{c||}{Validation Set} & \multicolumn{4}{c}{Testing Set} \\ \cline{2-13}
& Mean & Std. & Min & Max & Mean & Std. & Min & Max & Mean & Std. & Min & Max \\ \hline\hline
CROANN & 16.55 & 2.73 & 15.89 & 18.23 & 16.04 & 3.01 & 14.58 & 17.71 & \textbf{19.67} & 5.38 & 17.19 & 23.44 \\
SGAANN & 17.73 & 0.96 & 16.05 & 20.67 & 16.48 & 1.23 & 14.61 & 19.44 & 24.46 & 3.75 & 20.31 & 35.94 \\
EPANN & 18.38 & 1.56 & 16.28 & 21.34 & 17.18 & 1.87 & 14.75 & 20.55 & 25.75 & 4.89 & 18.23 & 36.46 \\
ESANN & 15.85 & 0.28 & 15.32 & 16.37 & 14.26 & 0.35 & 13.34 & 16.51 & 20.93 & 1.76 & 17.19 & 25.52 \\
PSOANN & 16.25 & 0.19 & 15.76 & 16.77 & 14.74 & 0.47 & 14.20 & 16.51 & 20.99 & 1.47 & 18.23 & 23.96 \\
GSOANN & 16.43 & 0.21 & 15.97 & 16.80 & 14.82 & 0.21 & 14.37 & 15.21 & 19.79 & 0.96 & 17.19 & 21.88 \\ \hline\hline
\end{tabular}%
\end{center}
\end{table*}
\begin{table*}
\caption{Comparison between CROANN and Other Machine Learning Algorithms of the Pima Indian Diabetes Dataset}
\small
\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{r|llllllll}
\hline
Algorithm & CROANN & GANet-best \cite{ECantuPaz2005} & SVM-best \cite{TVGestel2004} & CCSS \cite{SDzeroski2004} & COOP \cite{NGPedrajas2005} & CNNE \cite{MIslam2003} & EPNet \cite{XinYao1997} & EENCL \cite{YLiu2000} \\ \hline
Error Rate & 19.67 & 24.70 & 22.70 & 24.02 & 19.69 & \textbf{19.60} & 22.38 & 22.1 \\ \hline
\end{tabular}%
\end{center}
\end{table*}
The Wisconsin Breast Cancer dataset contains 699 samples, each of which has real-valued attributes and can be classified into two classes: 458 \textit{benign} and 241 \textit{malignant}. To test the performance of CROANN, all samples are divided into three parts by simple random sampling method: 349 training samples, 175 validation samples and 175 testing samples.
Results from CROANN and six other ANNs are listed in Table IV. CROANN performs superior to SGAANN, EPANN, PSOANN, GSOANN, and MGNN, and it has a similar performance with ESANN. As compared with GSOANN, CROANN can give a better standard derivation. There are also comparisons with recent published results listed in Table V. We also compare CROANN with other machine learning algorithms and the results are given in Table V. We can see that CROANN performs very well and shares the best performance with GANet-best.
\subsubsection{Pima Indian Diabetes Dataset}
The Pima Indian Diabetes dataset contains 768 samples, 500 of which are indicated with sign of diabetes and 268 are without such sign. There are eight real-valued attributes that can be used to determine whether a patient has the sign of diabetes or not. This dataset is known as a difficult problem for machine learning for its scarcity of samples and heavy noise pollution. This dataset is partitioned into 384 training samples, 192 validation samples and the 192 testing samples.
Table VI shows the comparison between CROANN and five other EA-based ANNs (MGNN is not included because there is no simulation data provided for this dataset in \cite{PPPalmes2005}). CROANN again outperforms the rest in terms of the testing set mean error. Results from other machine learning algorithms are tabulated in Table VII, which demonstrates that CROANN achieves a performance that is comparable with the best, i.e. CNNE, and greatly outperforms the others.
\section{Conclusion}
In this paper, we propose a novel EA-based ANNs called CROANN, to train ANNs, based on CRO. We have shown that CROANN can optimize the structure as well as the weights of ANNs simultaneously using stochastic processes. In CROANN, the structure and weights of a network is encapsulated in one solution, which is considered as a point in the solution space. In this way, CROANN searches the global minimum, which represents the network configuration providing the best performance. Since there are no restrictions on the evolution of the network structure and on the weight adaptation, CROANN does not suffer from the "structural hill-climbing" problem observed in the constructive and pruning approaches of ANN \cite{PPPalmes2005}. Simulation results show that CROANN can outperform other existing EA-based ANN algorithms. In the Iris dataset and the Pima Indian Diabetes dataset, CROANN provides the best testing error rate among all representative EA-based ANNs. Although CROANN is not the best in the test with the Wisconsin Breast Cancer dataset, the gap between the result generated by CROANN and the best one is indeed very small. In the comparisons with other sophisticated machine learning algorithms on the three classification problems, CROANN can always provide the best performance. To summarize, CRO is well suited to be incorporated in ANN to solve classification problems. In the future, we will conduct a systematic analysis of variance on the parameters and perform Student's t-test to show significance of the results. Moreover, we can further explore the ability of CROANN to solve some real-world classification problems, and other types of problems including function approximation, data processing, and robotics.
\section*{Acknowledgement}
This work is supported in part by the Strategic Research Theme of Information Technology of The University of Hong Kong. A.Y.S. Lam is also supported in part by the Croucher Foundation Research Fellowship.
|
\section{Introduction}
Given a database of images, image retrieval is the problem of returning images from the database that are most similar to a query. Performing image retrieval on databases with billions of images is challenging due to the linear time complexity of nearest neighbor retrieval algorithms. Image hashing\cite{lsh,klsh,sh,ksh, fasthash, mlh} addresses this problem by obtaining similarity preserving binary codes which represent high dimensional floating point image descriptors, and offer efficient storage and scalable retrieval with sub-linear search times. These binary hash-codes can be learned in unsupervised or supervised settings. Unsupervised hashing algorithms map nearby points in a metric space to similar binary codes. Supervised hashing algorithms try to preserve semantic label information in the Hamming space. Images that belong to the same class are mapped to similar binary codes.
In this work, we develop a new approach to supervised hashing, which we motivate with the following example (Figure~\ref{fig:toyexample}). Consider an image retrieval problem that involves a database of animals. A user provides the query image of a leopard. Now consider the following three scenarios :
\begin{enumerate}
\item If the retrieval algorithm returns images of leopards, we can deem the result to be absolutely satisfactory.
\item If the retrieval algorithm returns images of dolphins, whales or sharks, we consider the results to be absolutely unsatisfactory because not only are dolphins not leopards, they do not look anything at all like leopards.
\item If the retrieval algorithm returns the image of a jaguar or a tiger, we would be reasonably satisfied with the results. Although a jaguar is not the same as a leopard, it does look remarkably similar to one - it is a large carnivorous cat with spots and a tawny yellow coat.
\end{enumerate}
\begin{figure}[]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[height=3.5cm,width=8.5cm]{./Toy_example.jpg}
\end{center}
\caption{We prefer results II over I because they tend to retrieve images of classes(jaguar and tiger) related to the class label of the query(leopard), rather than unrelated classes(sharks and dolphins).}
\label{fig:toyexample}
\end{figure}
In the above example, leopards, dolphins, whales, sharks, jaguars and tigers all belong to different categories. However, some of these categories are more closely related to each other than to other categories. Animals which fall under the ``big cat'' (\emph{Panthera}) genus are related to each other, as are the large aquatic vertebrates like dolphins, sharks and whales. We designate the related categories as ``siblings''. To study the relationships between categories, Weinberger \emph{et al.}\cite{largemargin} suggested the concept of ``output embeddings'' - vector representations of category information in Euclidean space. There has been extensive work on ``input embeddings'', which are vector-space representations of images\cite{bow,fv,krizhevsky}, but less work has been done on output embeddings, which map similar category labels to similar vectors in Euclidean space. In an output embedding space of animals, we would expect to have embeddings for labels so that, chimpanzees, orangutans and gorillas are near each other as are leopards, cheetas, tigers and jaguars.
Our method, which uses output embeddings to construct hash codes in a supervised framework is called SHOE: Supervised Hashing with Output Embeddings (Figure~\ref{fig:imagenetvis}). Our motivation for doing this is two-fold. First, it is our belief (validated experimentally) that we can construct better binary codes for a particular class given knowledge of its sibling classes. Secondly, if our algorithm is unable to retrieve images of the same class, it will try to retrieve images of sibling classes, rather than images of unrelated classes. The assumption here is that if images of the same class as the query cannot be retrieved, images of sibling classes are more useful to the user than images of unrelated classes. We perform extensive retrieval experiments on the Caltech-UCSD Birds(CUB) dataset\cite{cub}, SUN Attribute Dataset\cite{sun} and ImageNet\cite{ilsvrc2010}. Our hash-codes can also be used to do classification, and we report accuracy on the CUB dataset using a nearest-neighbor classifier which is better than R-CNN and its variants \cite{rcnn, partrcnn}.
\noindent
The contributions of our paper are as follows :
\begin{enumerate}
\item To the best of our knowledge, our approach is the first to introduce the problem of learning supervised hash functions using output embeddings.
\item We propose a joint learning method to solve the above problem, and perform retrieval and classification experiments to experimentally validate our method.
\item We propose two new evaluation criteria - ``sibling metrics'' and ``weighted sibling metrics'', for gauging the efficacy of our method.
\item We significantly boost retrieval and classification performance by applying Canonical Correlation Analysis \cite{cca} on supervised features, and learn hash functions using output embeddings on these features.
\end{enumerate}
The remainder of this paper is arranged as follows. Section ~\ref{sec:related} describes related work. In Section ~\ref{sec:method} we describe our hashing framework, and carry out experiments in Sections ~\ref{sec:experiments} and ~\ref{sec:classification}. We conclude in Section ~\ref{sec:conclusion}.
\begin{figure}[t]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[height=4.5cm,width=8.5cm]{./imagenet_modified.jpg}
\end{center}
\caption{We perform k-means clustering on Word2Vec embeddings \cite{mikolov} of ImageNet classes. The principle behind SHOE is that images belonging to related classes (like leopard or tiger, which are nearby in the output embedding space) are mapped to nearby binary codes (represented by points on a binary hypercube). Images belonging to unrelated classes (like leopards and aircraft) are mapped to distant binary codes. This figure was created using \cite{tsne} and is for illustrative purposes.}
\label{fig:imagenetvis}
\end{figure}
\section{Related Work}
\label{sec:related}
Work on image hashing can be divided into unsupervised and supervised methods. For the purpose of brevity, we only consider supervised methods. Supervised Hashing algorithms are based on the objective function of minimizing the difference between hamming distances and similarity of pairs of data points. Supervised Hashing with Kernels(KSH)\cite{ksh} uses class labels to determine the similarity. Points are considered `similar' (value `1') if they belong to the same class and `dissimilar` (value `-1') otherwise. They utilize a simplified objective function using the relation between the hamming distance and inner products of the binary codes. A sequential greedy optimization is adapted to obtain supervised projections. FastHash \cite{fasthash} also uses a KSH objective function but employs decision trees as hash functions and utilizes a GraphCut based method for binary code inference. Minimal loss hashing \cite{mlh} uses a structured SVM framework \cite{ssvm} to generate binary codes with an online learning algorithm.
All these methods except KSH categorize the input pairs to be either similar or dissimilar. KSH allows a similarity 0 for related pairs, but the authors only use it to define metric neighbors and not for semantic neighbors. FastHash entirely ignores the related pairs, as it weighs the KSH loss function by the absolute value of the label. Also, their work does not support a similarity value other than 1 and -1, as it violates the submodularity property - a crucial property required to solve the problem in parts. To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to use similarity information of sibling classes in a supervised hashing framework. Our work is also different from others as we compute similarity from output embeddings and use a joint learning framework to learn the sibling similarity. We now discuss related work about output embeddings.
Output embeddings can be defined as vector representations of class labels. These are divided into two types: data-independent and data-dependent. Some of the data-independent embeddings include \cite{langford, cub, awa, sun, taxonomy}. Langford \emph{et al.} \cite{langford} constructed output embeddings randomly from the rows of a Hadamard matrix where each embedding was a random vector of 1 or -1. Embeddings constructed from side information about classes such as attributes, or a Linnean hierarchy are available with datasets such as \cite{cub, awa, sun}. In WSABIE\cite{wsabie}, the authors jointly learn the input embeddings and the output embeddings to maximize classification accuracy in a structural SVM setting. Akata \emph{et al.}\cite{akata} uses the WSABIE framework to learn fine grained classification models by mapping the output embeddings to attributes, taxonomies and their combination.
The binary hash-codes that our method, SHOE, learns on the CUB and SUN datasets use attributes as output embeddings, just like \cite{akata}. For ILSVRC2010 experiments, we use a taxonomy derived embeddings similar to \cite{taxonomy}. In a taxonomy embedding, a binary output embedding vector is obtained, where each node in the class hierarchy and its ancestors are represented as 1 while non-ancestors are represented as 0. Deng \emph{et al.} \cite{deng} show that classification that takes hierarchies into account can be informative. Mikolov \emph{et al.} \cite{mikolov} use a skip-gram architecture trained on a large text corpus to learn output embeddings for words and short phrases. These Word2Vec embeddings are used by \cite{devise} for large scale image classification and zero-shot learning. Finally, output embeddings can even be learned from the data. For example, \cite{costa} exploits co-occurences of visual concepts to learn classifiers for unseen labels using known classifiers. All these methods use output embeddings for classification and zero shot learning, but none have used them to learn binary codes for retrieval.
\section{Method}
\label{sec:method}
\begin{figure*}
\begin{center}
\begin{minipage}[t]{.68\linewidth}
\vspace{0pt}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.3\linewidth]{./plots/cub_2000_300_compare/precision_30.eps}
\includegraphics[width=0.3\linewidth]{./plots/cub_2000_300_compare/Sibling_precision_30.eps}
\includegraphics[width=0.3\linewidth]{./plots/cub_2000_300_compare/Weighted_Sibling_precision_30.eps}
\end{minipage}%
\begin{minipage}[t]{0.32\linewidth}
\vspace{0pt}
\centering
\small
\begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|}
\hline
Method & mAP & $Sib_{mAP}$ & $Sib_{mAP}^w$ \\
\hline
SHOE(E) & 0.111 & \textbf{0.250} & \textbf{0.174} \\ \hline
KSH & \textbf{0.113} & 0.133 & 0.108 \\ \hline
FastHash & 0.045 & 0.062 & 0.047 \\ \hline
ITQ & 0.060 & 0.119 & 0.084 \\ \hline
LSH & 0.013 & 0.044 & 0.028 \\ \hline
\end{tabular}
\end{minipage}
\normalsize
\end{center}
\caption{ Retrieval on CUB dataset comparing our method SHOE(E) with the state-of-the art hashing techniques. The above plots report precision, sibling precision and weighted sibling precision for top 5 sibling classes for bits $c=\{16, 32, 64, 128, 256\}$. The table reports mAP, Sibling and Weighted Sibling mAP for $c=64$ bits. }
\label{fig:cub2000compare}
\end{figure*}
\subsection{Preliminaries}
Given a training set $M = \{(x_1, y_1), .... , (x_N, y_N) \} $ of $N$ (image,label) pairs with $x_i \in \mathcal{X}$ and $y_i \in \mathcal{Y}$, let $\phi: \mathcal{X} \rightarrow \bar{\mathcal{X}} \in \mathcal{R}^d$ be the input embedding function and $\psi: \mathcal{Y} \rightarrow \bar{\mathcal{Y}} \in \mathcal{R}^e$ be the output embedding function. We wish to learn binary codes $b_i, b_j$ of length $c$ (i.e., $b_i \in \{-1, 1\}^c$) such that for pairs of training images, the Hamming distance between the codes preserve the distance between their class labels (given by their corresponding output embedding vectors). In other words, for a given query image, retrieved results of sibling(unrelated) classes ought to be ranked higher(lower). To this end, we obtain the following objective function:
\small
\begin{equation} \label{eq:distobj}
\min O(b) = \sum_{i=1}^N\sum_{j=1}^N (d_H(b_i, b_j) - d_E(\psi(y_i), \psi(y_j)))^2.
\end{equation}
\normalsize
where $d_H(b_i, b_j)$ is the Hamming distance between binary codes $b_i$ and $b_j$ and $d_E$ is the Euclidean distance between the output embedding vectors $\psi(y_i)$ and $\psi(y_j)$.
For an input image $x$ with input embedding vector $\phi(x)$, we obtain binary code $b$ of length $c$ bits. Each bit is computed using a hash function $h_l(x)$ that takes the form :
\begin{equation}
h_l(x) = sgn(w_l \phi(x)), w_l \in \mathcal{R}^d.
\end{equation}
To learn $c$ such hash functions $\mathcal{H} = \{h_l | l = 1, \ldots ,c\}$, we learn $c$ projection vectors $W = [w_1, w_2 \ldots,w_c]$, which we compactly write as $H(x) = sgn(W\phi(x))$, $W \in \mathcal{R}^{c\times d}$. Without loss of generality, we can assume that $\phi(x)$ is a mean-centered feature. This ensures we obtain compact codes by satisfying the balanced property of hashing (i.e, each bit fires approximately 50\% of the time)\cite{sh}. $\phi(x)$ can be an input embedding that maps images to features in either kernelized or unkernelized forms.
Solving the optimization problem in Equation (1) is not straightforward, so we utilize the relation between inner product of binary codes and Hamming distances \cite{mdsh, ksh}, given as $2d_H(b_i, b_j) = c - b_i^T b_j$, where $b_i^T b_j = \sum_{l=1}^c h_l(\phi(x_i)) h_l(\phi(x_j))$ is the inner product of the binary codes $b_i$ and $b_j$. Note that the inner product of binary codes lies between $-c$ and $+c$, while the Hamming distance ranges from $0$ to $c$, where the distance between the nearest neighbors is $0$ and between the farthest neighbors is $c$ . By unit normalizing the output embedding vectors, $\|\bar{\psi}(y)\| = 1$, we exploit the relationship between Euclidean distances and the dot products of normalized vectors, given as $d_E(\bar{\psi}(y_i), \bar{\psi}(y_j)))^2 = 2 - 2\bar{\psi}(y_i)^T\bar{\psi}(y_j)$, and obtain the following objective function:
\small
\begin{equation}\label{eq:dotprodobj}
\min_{\substack{\mathcal{H}}} \sum_{i=1}^N\sum_{j=1}^N ( \frac{1}{c}\sum_{l=1}^c h_l(\phi(x_i)) h_l(\phi(x_j)) - \bar{\psi}(y_i)^T\bar{\psi}(y_j))^2
\end{equation}
\normalsize
Let $o_{ij} = \bar{\psi}(y_i)^T\bar{\psi}(y_j)$ and as a consequence of the unit normalization of $\bar{\psi}(y_i)$, $-1 \leq o_{ij} \leq 1$, which implies that the similarity between same classes is \textbf{1} and similarity between different classes is as low as \textbf{-1}. The objective ensures that the learned binary codes preserve the similarity between output embeddings, which is required for supervised hashing and our goal of ranking related neighbors before farthest neighbors.
This is similar to the KSH\cite{ksh} objective function, except that KSH assumes that $o_{ij}$ takes only values $1$($-1$) for similar(dissimilar) pairs defined with semantic information. Their work also accomodates the definition of the $o_{ij}=0$ for related pairs but only for metric neighbors. Our work is different from theirs, as we emphasize the learning of binary codes that preserve the similarity between the classes, whereas $o_{ij}$ captures the similarity between the classes. Regardless of the definition of $o_{ij}$, our optimization is similar, and so we employ a similar sequential greedy optimization for minimizing $O(b)$. We refer the reader to \cite{ksh} for further details.
\subsection{Evaluation Criteria}
\label{sec:sibeval}
Standard metrics like precision, recall and mAP defined for semantic neighbors are not sufficient to evaluate the retrieval of the sibling class images. To measure this, we define \emph{sibling precision}, \emph{sibling recall} and \emph{sibling average precision} metrics. Let $R_y:(y_i, y_j) \rightarrow rank$ return the rank of class $y_j$ for a query class $y_i$, $0 \leq rank \leq L$, where $L$ is the number of classes. Note that, $R_y(y, y)=0$ for the same class. The ranking $R_y$ is computed by sorting the distance between the output embedding vectors $\psi(y)$ and $\psi(y^*)$, $y^* \in \mathcal{Y} \setminus y$. We obtain the weight of the sibling class used for evaluation using the following functions for Sibling($Sib_m$) and Weighted Sibling($Sib^w_m$) metrics:
\begin{equation*}
Sib_m: (y_i, y_j, R_y) \rightarrow \mathbb{I}(R_y(y_i, y_j)) \leq m)
\end{equation*}
\vspace{-0.3cm}
\begin{equation*}
Sib^w_m:(y_i,y_j, R_y) \rightarrow \frac{m-R_y(y_i,y_j)}{m}*\mathbb{I}(rank \leq m)
\end{equation*}
where, $m$ is the number of related classes for each query class and $\mathbb{I}(.)$ is the Indicator function that returns $0$ when $rank>m$. The Sibling and Weighted Sibling precision@k, recall@k and mAP is defined as:
\vspace{-0.3cm}
\begin{equation}
s_{precision_q}^{w}@k = \frac{\sum_{l=1}^{k} Sib^w_m(y_q, y_{q_l}, R_y)} {k}
\end{equation}
\vspace{-0.3cm}
\begin{equation}
s_{recall_q}^{w}@k = \frac{\sum_{l=1}^{k} Sib^w_m(y_q, y_{q_l}, R_y)}{\sum_{p=1}^{L} \mathcal{N}_l * \mathbb{I}(Sib^w_m(y_q, y_p, R))}
\end{equation}
\vspace{-0.3cm}
\begin{equation}
s_{AP_q}^{w} = \sum_{k=1}^{N} s_{precision_q}@k \times \triangle s_{recall_q}@k
\end{equation}
\vspace{-0.3cm}
\begin{equation}
s_{mAP}^{w} = \frac{\sum_{q=1}^{Q} s_{AP_q}}{Q}
\end{equation}
\vspace{-0.3cm}
In the above equations, $y_{q_l}$ refers to the class of the $l^{th}$ retrieved image.
\subsection{Preliminary Experiments}
\label{sec:embedexp}
We evaluate the proposed hashing scheme that takes into account structure of the related classes with the following performance metrics: Precision@k, mAP and their sibling versions previously defined.
\begin{itemize}
\item{\textbf{\textit{Datasets:}}} To test our approach, we use datasets that contain information about class structure. The CUB-2011 dataset \cite{cub} contains 200 fine-grained bird categories with 312 attributes and is well suited for our purpose. In this dataset, although both binary and continuous real-valued attributes are available, we use only the mean-centered real-valued attributes as output embeddings $\psi(y)$. We obtain ranking $R_y$ for each class $y$ based on these attribute embeddings. There are 5994 train and 5774 test images in the dataset. We select a subset of the dataset of size $2000$ for training, use the whole train set for retrieval and all test images as queries. Ground truth for a query is defined label-wise and each query class has approximately 30 same class neighbors in the retrieval set. For input embeddings, we extract state-of-the-art 4096 dimesional Convolution Neural Network (CNN) features from the fc7 layer for each image using the Caffe Deep Learning library developed by \cite{caffe}. We kernelize the CNN features which take the form :$\sum_{i=1}^{p} \kappa(x,x_i)$ where $\kappa$ is a radial basis kernel, and $p$ is the cardinality of a subset of training sample, designated as ``anchor points''. We refer to these as CNN+K features and they are inherently mean-centered.
\item{\textbf{\textit{Comparison methods:}}} We compare our method with raw output embeddings:SHOE(E), with the following supervised and unsupervised hashing schemes: KSH\cite{ksh}, FastHash\cite{fasthash}, ITQ\cite{itq} and LSH\cite{lsh}. We use their publicly available implementations and set the parameters to obtain the best performance. It is important to note that none of these methods utilize the distribution of class labels in the output embedding space. The closest comparison would be to use KSH, setting the similarity of semantic class neighbors to 0 value. For this purpose, we obtain top-$m$ related pairs for each class using $R_y$ and set the similarity to $0$ for related pairs. To evaluate the unsupervised ITQ and LSH, we zero-center the data and apply PCA to learn the projections. We use CNN+K features with $p=300$ for evaluating SHOE(E) and KSH since we learn linear projections in these methods, unlike FastHash which learns non-linear decision trees on linear features.
\item{\textbf{\textit{Results:}}} Figure~\ref{fig:cub2000compare} shows the precision@30, sibling and weighted sibling precision@30 plots for 5 related classes, i.e. $m=6$(+1 for the same class) by encoding the input embeddings to bits of length $c=\{16, 32, 64, 128, 256\}$. The table in Figure~\ref{fig:cub2000compare} shows the recall and mAP and its sibling variants for 64 bits. We observe that SHOE(E) does better than baselines for both sibling and weighted sibling precision metrics for top-30 retrieved neigbhors for all bit lengths, but there is a loss in precision compared to the KSH method. In their paper, FastHash\cite{fasthash} shows better performance compared to KSH. However, it does not perform well here because of the large number of classes and few training samples available per class.
\end{itemize}
\subsection{Analysis}
\begin{figure}[hb]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=0.48\linewidth]{./plots/cub_hcs_bbox_plots_1000_combined/precision_30.eps}
\includegraphics[width=0.48\linewidth]{./plots/cub_hcs_bbox_plots_1000_combined/map.eps}
\end{center}
\caption{ Retrieval on CUB dataset evaluating the performance of our method(SHOE) for varying $\theta$ values and $p=1000$. The left and right y-axis show the standard metrics and sibling metrics respectively.}
\label{fig:cub2000analysisr}
\end{figure}
Contrary to our expectation that related class information improves both standard and sibling performance metrics, experiments in ~\ref{sec:embedexp} show that using similarity directly from output embeddings actually reduces the performance for same classes, while improving it for sibling classes. To analyse this, we obtained top-$m$ related classes using ranking $R_y$ and assigned a constant $o_{ij} = \theta$ value (previously, in Equation\eqref{eq:dotprodobj}, we had defined $o_{ij} = \bar{\psi}(y_i)^T\bar{\psi}(y_j)$). $\theta$ measures the similarity between a class and a related class. Figure ~\ref{fig:cub2000analysisr} show the performance of our method(SHOE) for varying $\theta$ values for 64 bits on CUB-2011 dataset. Results reveal that, when a fixed similarity is used, we actually gain performance from the sibling class training examples, and this gain is maximized for negative values of $\theta$, i.e $-1< \theta < 0$. The intuition behind this is: when $\theta$ is close to 1, the learned hash-code would not discriminate well enough between identical classes and sibling classes. For instance, in our ``database of animals'' example, we would learn hash-codes that nearly equate leopards with jaguars, which is not what we desire. On the other hand, when $\theta$ is close to -1, a hash-code for a leopard image will be learned mostly from other training images of leopards, but with slight consideration towards training images of its sibling classes. When $\theta$ is assigned -1, the sibling classes aren't considered at all, so our method becomes identical to KSH\cite{ksh}. We are now interested in learning $\theta$ simultaneously with the hash functions during the training phase.
\subsection{SHOE Revisited}
\label{subsec:ourmethod}
We observe that the objective function that we want to minimize in Equation~\eqref{eq:dotprodobj} can be split into three parts - for identical classes, sibling classes and unrelated classes, respectively. We also observe from the preceding analysis that precision and recall metrics improve for negative values of $\theta$. Therefore, we add regularizer term $\lambda\norm{\theta + 1}^2$ to the objective function, which becomes small when $\theta$ lies close to -1. For easier notation, we denote $h_{l_i} = h_l(\phi(x_i))$. Our modified objective function now becomes :
\begin{figure*}
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=0.24\linewidth]{./plots/cub_bbox_learn_2000_1000_compare/Weighted_Sibling_map.eps}
\includegraphics[width=0.24\linewidth]{./plots/cub_bbox_cca_2000_1000_learn_compare/Weighted_Sibling_map.eps}
\includegraphics[width=0.24\linewidth]{./plots/sun_compare_3585_learn/Weighted_Sibling_map.eps}
\includegraphics[width=0.24\linewidth]{./plots/sun_compare_35835_learn_cca/Weighted_Sibling_map.eps}
\includegraphics[width=0.24\linewidth]{./plots/cub_bbox_learn_2000_1000_compare/Sibling_map.eps}
\includegraphics[width=0.24\linewidth]{./plots/cub_bbox_cca_2000_1000_learn_compare/Sibling_map.eps}
\includegraphics[width=0.24\linewidth]{./plots/sun_compare_3585_learn/Sibling_map.eps}
\includegraphics[width=0.24\linewidth]{./plots/sun_compare_35835_learn_cca/Sibling_map.eps}
\includegraphics[width=0.24\linewidth]{./plots/cub_bbox_learn_2000_1000_compare/map.eps}
\includegraphics[width=0.24\linewidth]{./plots/cub_bbox_cca_2000_1000_learn_compare/map.eps}
\includegraphics[width=0.24\linewidth]{./plots/sun_compare_3585_learn/map.eps}
\includegraphics[width=0.24\linewidth]{./plots/sun_compare_35835_learn_cca/map.eps}
\end{center}
\caption{ Retrieval on CUB-2011(first and second column) and SUN(third and fourth column) dataset comparing our methods SHOE(E) and SHOE(L) with the state-of-the art hashing techniques. The above plots report mAP, Sibling and Weighted Sibling mAP for top 5 sibling classes.}
\label{fig:cubsunsmallsetlearn}
\end{figure*}
\small
\begin{gather}
\min_{\substack{W, \theta}} \sum_{i,j \in}^N\sum_{\substack{same\\class}}^N ( \frac{1}{c}\sum_{l=1}^c h_{l_i} h_{l_j} - 1)^2
+ \sum_{i,j \in}^N\sum_{\substack{sibling\\class}}^N ( \frac{1}{c}\sum_{l=1}^c h_{l_i} h_{l_j} - \theta)^2 \nonumber\\
\label{eq:ourobj} +\hspace{-0.05 cm} \sum_{i,j \in}^N\sum_{\substack{unrelated\\class}}^N ( \frac{1}{c}\sum_{l=1}^c h_{l_i} h_{l_j} + 1)^2 + \lambda \norm{\theta + 1}^2
\end{gather}
\normalsize
Let $\mathcal{H}_{{ij}_c} = \frac{1}{c}\displaystyle\sum_{l=1}^c h_{l_i} h_{l_j}$ denote the sum of the inner product of the binary codes $b_i$ and $b_j$ of length $c$. We now compute the derivative of Equation~\eqref{eq:ourobj} w.r.t $\theta$, set it to 0 and solve for $\theta$. We obtain :
\begin{equation} \label{eq:thetader}
\theta = \theta_c = \frac{\displaystyle\sum_{i,j \in}^N\displaystyle\sum_{\substack{sibling\\class}}^N ( \mathcal{H}_{{ij}_c} - \lambda)}{c(n_{sib} + \lambda)}
\end{equation}
\noindent
where $n_{sib}$ is the number of sibling pairs in the training data. We have thus obtained a closed form solution for the optimal $\theta$. However, we cannot calculate $\theta$ directly as we do not learn all the bits at once. Therefore, we employ a two step alternate optimization procedure that first learns the bits and then an approximate $\theta_l$ value calculated from the previously learned bits. For the first iteration, we use an initial $\theta_0$ value, that satisfies the constraint: $-1<\theta_0<0$. The two step optimization procedure for learning the $l^{th}$ hash function is:
\begin{enumerate}
\item Step 1 : We optimize for Equation~\eqref{eq:dotprodobj}, keeping $\theta_{l-1}$ constant and updating the projection vector $W$, thus learning hash-code bits $h_l(\phi(x_i))$.
\item Step 2 : We keep the hash-code bits $h_l(\phi(x_i))$ constant and learn for $\theta_l$ using Equation~\eqref{eq:thetader}.
\end{enumerate}
\subsection{Supervised Dimensionality Reduction}
As our datasets contain class label information and corresponding output embeddings, we have explored the idea of
supervised dimensionality reduction for input embeddings $\phi(x) \in R^d$ to $\omega(x) \in R^c (c \ll d) $, given the output embeddings $\psi(y) \in R^E$. There are many supervised dimensionality reduction techniques available in the literature like Canonical Correlation Analysis (CCA) \cite{cca} and Partial Least Square Regressions \cite{pls}, for example. In particular, we have used CCA \cite{cca} ($\phi \rightarrow \omega$) to extract a common latent space from two views that maximizes the correlation with each other. \cite{itq} also leveraged the label information using CCA to obtain supervised features prior to binary encoding. However, they limit their output embeddings to take the form of one vs remainder embeddings: : $\psi(y) \in \{0, 1\}^L$ is a $L$-dimensional binary vector with exactly one bit set to 1 i.e. $\psi(y)_y = 1$ where $L$ is the number of class labels. On the other hand, we apply CCA to the general form of output embeddings that are real valued
continuous attributes capturing structure between the classes. We observe that when supervised features with CCA-projections are used, we obtain a significant boost in performance ($\approx 100\%$ improvement) for all of our evaluation metrics.
\begin{table*}
\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|}
\hline
Method & \multicolumn{6}{|c|}{CUB-2011(5000 train)} & \multicolumn{6}{|c|}{SUN Attribute(7000 train)} \\
\hline
\hline
& \multicolumn{2}{|c|}{$pre|mAP$} & \multicolumn{2}{|c|}{$Sib_{pre|mAP}$} & \multicolumn{2}{|c|}{$Sib^w_{pre|mAP}$}
& \multicolumn{2}{|c|}{$pre|mAP$} & \multicolumn{2}{|c|}{$Sib_{pre|mAP}$} & \multicolumn{2}{|c|}{$Sib^w_{pre|mAP}$} \\
\hline
& @30 & mAP & @30 & mAP & @30 & mAP & @10 & mAP & @10 & mAP & @10 & mAP\\
\hline
SHOE(L)+CCA & 0.481 & \textbf{0.527} &\textbf{0.701} & 0.529 & \textbf{0.617} & \textbf{0.436} & 0.169 & 0.201 & \textbf{0.344} & \textbf{0.239} & \textbf{0.269} & \textbf{0.193} \\
\hline
SHOE(E)+CCA & 0.387 & 0.429 & 0.668 & \textbf{0.533} & 0.554 & 0.429 & 0.112 & 0.134 & 0.270 & 0.205 & 0.199 & 0.152 \\
\hline
KSH+CCA & \textbf{0.488} & 0.526 & 0.661 & 0.290 & 0.595 & 0.303 & \textbf{0.191} & \textbf{0.220} & 0.300 & 0.130 & 0.252 & 0.126 \\
\hline
ITQ+CCA & 0.242 & 0.256 & 0.339 & 0.125 & 0.299 & 0.129 & 0.062 & 0.070 & 0.108 & 0.044 & 0.088 & 0.041 \\
\hline
FastHash & 0.240 & 0.246 & 0.341 & 0.120 & 0.298 & 0.124 & 0.021 & 0.021 & 0.038 & 0.017 & 0.030 & 0.014 \\
\hline
LSH & 0.024 & 0.017 & 0.082 & 0.049 & 0.054 & 0.032 & 0.010 & 0.009 & 0.034 & 0.018 & 0.022 & 0.012 \\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\end{center}
\caption{Comparing Precision, mAP and their sibling variants with our methods(SHOE(L) and SHOE(E)) and several baselines for 128 bits. We apply CCA projections for all the methods except FastHash and LSH as their performance decreases. For sibling metrics, SHOE performs significantly better than the baselines and performs as well as the baselines for standard metrics.}
\label{tab:prerecomparebig}
\end{table*}
\section{Experiments}
\label{sec:experiments}
We evaluate our method on the following datasets: Caltech-UCSD Birds (CUB) Dataset \cite{cub}, the SUN Attribute Dataset \cite{sun} and Imagenet ILSVRC2010 dataset \cite{ilsvrc2010}. We extract CNN features from \cite{caffe}, as mentioned in Section~\ref{sec:embedexp}. In the case of CUB dataset, we extract CNN features for the bounding boxes that accompany the images. For CUB and SUN datasets, we create two training sets of different size to examine the variation in performance with number of training examples. For all the datasets, we define the ground truth using class labels.
\textbf{\textit{Datasets:}} We have described the CUB dataset in Section 3. The ImageNet ILSVRC 2010 dataset is a subset of ImageNet and contains about 1.2 million images distributed amongst 1000 classes. We uniformly select 2 images per class as a test set and use the rest as retrieval set. We select 5000 training and $p=3000$ anchor point images by uniformly sampling across all classes. We obtain the output embeddings for the ImageNet class using the method of Tsochantaridis\cite{taxonomy}. Each of the 74401 synsets in ImageNet is a node in a hierarchy graph and using this graph, we obtain the ancestors for each class in ILSVRC 2010 dataset. We then construct a matrix $O_{Imagenet} = \{0,1\}_{1000 \times 74401}$, where
the $j^{th}$ column of the $i^{th}$ row is set to 1 if the $j^{th}$ class is an ancestor of the $i^{th}$ class, 0 otherwise. Thus, the output embedding of each class is represented by a row of $O_{Imagenet}$.
The SUN Attribute dataset\cite{sun} contains 14340 images equally distributed amongst 717 classes, accompanied by annotations of 102 real valued attributes. We partition the dataset into equal retrieval and test sets, each containing 7170 images. We derive two variants from the retrieval set - the first has 3585(5 per class) training and 1434(2 per class) anchor point images, while the second has 7000(10 per class) training and 3000(~4 per class) anchor point images. In this dataset, each test query has 10 same class neighbors and 50 sibling class neighbors in the retrieval set. We compute a per class embedding by averaging embedding vectors for each image in the class.
\textbf{\textit{Evaluation Protocol:}} For binary hash-codes of length $c = \{16, 32, 64, 128, 256\}$, we evaluate SHOE using standard, sibling and weighted sibling flavors of precision, recall and mAP. Two variants of SHOE are used - SHOE(E), which uses raw output embeddings, and SHOE(L), which is learned using the method in Section \ref{subsec:ourmethod}. For the smaller CUB and SUN subsets, we compute mAP and their sibling versions. For the big subsets, in addition to mAP, we also compute precision. In the case of ImageNet, we compute precision@50, recall@10K, mAP and their sibling variants.
\textbf{\textit{Results:}}
We compare our method to the methods which are well known in image-hashing literature mentioned in section~\ref{sec:embedexp} and present the results in Figure~\ref{fig:cubsunsmallsetlearn} and Table~\ref{tab:prerecomparebig}. We use CNN+K features as input embeddings for SHOE and KSH. For the other methods, we use only CNN features. The rows represent weighted sibling, sibling and mAP metrics. The first two columns represent experiments without and with CCA projections on the CUB dataset, while the latter two columns represent the same on the SUN Attribute dataset. From these plots, we see that our method SHOE(red and green), without CCA projections, comfortably outperforms the best baseline, KSH(blue) on all metrics for both datasets. Using the CCA projections, we significantly improve the performance(by $\approx 100\%$) for SHOE, KSH and ITQ, while it lowers the performance of FastHash and LSH. Our method with CCA projections performs as well as the KSH baseline on the mAP metric and outperforms on the sibling or weighted sibling metrics. The gap in performance between SHOE and KSH reduces when CCA projections are applied on the standard metrics, but not on the sibling metrics. On ImageNet, we only show results with CCA projected features. We observe a similar trend, with SHOE surpassing KSH on recall@10K and sibling precision metrics, while performing as well as KSH on precision@50 and mAP.
\begin{figure*}
\begin{center}
\begin{minipage}[t]{.68\linewidth}
\vspace{0pt}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.32\linewidth]{./plots/imagenet_5000_3000_compare_5/recall_10000.eps}
\includegraphics[width=0.32\linewidth]{./plots/imagenet_5000_3000_compare_5/Sibling_recall_10000.eps}
\includegraphics[width=0.32\linewidth]{./plots/imagenet_5000_3000_compare_5/Weighted_Sibling_recall_10000.eps}
\end{minipage}%
\begin{minipage}[t]{0.32\linewidth}
\vspace{0pt}
\centering
\small
\begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|}
\hline
Method & pre & $s_{pre}$ & $s_{pre}^w$ \\
\hline
SHOE(L)+CCA & 24.5 & \textbf{32.6} & \textbf{29.1}\\ \hline
KSH+CCA & \textbf{24.8} & 30.4 & 28.0 \\ \hline
ITQ+CCA & 6.5 & 10.8 & 9.9 \\ \hline
\hline
Method & mAP & $s_{mAP}$ & $s_{mAP}^w$ \\ \hline
SHOE(L)+CCA & \textbf{0.039} & \textbf{0.021} & \textbf{0.022}\\ \hline
KSH+CCA & 0.036 & 0.010 & 0.014 \\ \hline
ITQ+CCA & 0.005 & 0.001 & 0.002 \\ \hline
\end{tabular}
\end{minipage}
\normalsize
\end{center}
\caption{ Retrieval on ILSVRC2010 dataset comparing SHOE with state-of-the art hashing techniques. We use $5K$ training samples and CNN+K+CCA as features for all the binary encoding schemes. The above plots report $recall$, $Sib_{re}$, $Sib_{re}^w$ @10K for top 5 sibling classes for bits $c=\{32, 64, 128, 256\}$. Table reports precision@50, mAP and their sibling versions for $256$ bits. }
\label{fig:imagenetcompare}
\end{figure*}
\section{Fine-grained Category Classification}
\label{sec:classification}
In this section, we demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed codes for fine-grained classification of bird categories in CUB-2011 dataset. We propose a simple nearest neighbor pooling classifier that classifies a given test image by assigning it to the most common label among the top-$k$ retrieved images. Let $R_x(q,x) \rightarrow rank $ give the ranking of the images retrieved based on our binary codes. Thus, $rank$ is 1 for the nearest neigbhor and $rank$ is $N$ for the farthest neighbor, where $N$ is the size of the database. Given such ranking, with $\mathcal{M}_q$ denoting the top-$k$ ranked neighbors of a new query $q$, we define the k-nn pooling classifier as:
\begin{equation}
class_{predict}(q) = \argmax_{\substack{y}} \sum_{x \in \mathcal{M}_q} \mathbb{I}(class(x)==y)
\end{equation}
We use the above model to obtain the classification accuracy on the CUB dataset with 200 categories from top-$10$ neighbors. In particular, we obtain the following accuracies: top-1 accuracy(top-1) measures if the predicted class matches the ground truth class, top-5 accuracy(top-5) measures if one of the top-5 predicted classes match the ground truth class and sibling accuracy(sib) measures if the predicted class is one of the sibling classes of the ground truth class. As a baseline, we train a linear SVM model on the CNN features. We compare our proposed binary codes SHOE(L), KSH and state-of-the-art fine grained classification models that use CNN features. For this experiment, we use bounding box information, but do not use any part-based information available with the datasets. Hence, we do a fair comparison between methods with no part-based information. Table ~\ref{tab:classacc} shows the classification performance over the 5794 test images with approximately 30 images for each of the 200 categories.
\begin{figure}[t]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[height=4.5cm,width=8.5cm]{./cubqualres.png}
\end{center}
\caption{The first query is of an ovenbird. SHOE retrieves more ovenbirds than KSH. The second query is of a Brewer black-bird. Neither SHOE nor KSH retrieve Brewer black-birds. However, SHOE returns ravens, which are sibling classes of Brewer black-birds, whereas KSH retrieves pileated woodpeckers, which are unrelated to black-birds. Here, blue borders represent sibling classes. }
\label{fig:cubqualres}
\end{figure}
\textbf{\textit{Features:}} For each of the binary coding schemes(SHOE, KSH, ITQ), we use the CNN+K+CCA(kernelized CNN with CCA projections) features as input embeddings and mean-centered attributes as the output embeddings. For the experiments, we used only 128 bit codes, while CNN features are 4096 dimensional vectors.
\begin{table}
\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{c|c|c|c|c}
\hline
Method & top-1 & top-5 & sib & \small{Compression} \\
\hline
Baseline(SVM) & 50.6 & 75.6 & 70.19 & 1\\
\hline
\hline
SHOE(L)+CCA & \textbf{52.51} & \textbf{77.8} & \textbf{72.4} & \textbf{1024} \\
KSH+CCA & 52.48 & 75.1 & 69.06 & \textbf{1024}\\
ITQ+CCA & 27.5& 43.4 & 37.6& \textbf{1024}\\
R-CNN\cite{rcnn} & 51.5 & - & - & 1\\
Part-RCNN\cite{partrcnn} & 52.38 & - & - & 1\\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\end{center}
\caption{Comparing classification accuracies for CUB dataset. For top-1 and sibling accuracy, we used $k=10$ neighbors. To obtain top-5 accuracy, we used $k=50$ neighbors. For the binary coding schemes, we used only 5000 of the 5994 train images to obtain 128 bits, while the classification models are trained on the full set. '-' indicates that the information is not available in their paper.}
\label{tab:classacc}
\end{table}
\textbf{\textit{Results:}} We observe that not only do the proposed binary codes obtain a marginal improvement in performance over the complex classification models in \cite{rcnn} \cite{partrcnn}, but they also offer an astounding compression ratio of \textbf{1024}. Also, the training and testing times of binary coding schemes are significantly smaller than those with SVM classification models.
\section{Conclusion}
\label{sec:conclusion}
The key idea in our paper is to exploit output embeddings that capture relationships between classes and we use them to learn better hash functions for images. In our work, a method to learn class similarity jointly with the hash function was devised, along with new metrics for their evaluation. Our method SHOE, achieved state-of-the art image retrieval results over multiple datasets for hash codes of varying lengths. Our second innovation was to utilize CCA to learn a projection of features with output embeddings, which resulted in significant gains in both retrieval and classification experiments. Upon applying this approach to all methods, we perform as well or better than all baselines over all datasets.
{\small
\bibliographystyle{ieee}
|
\section{Introduction}\label{sec:intro}
In practice, solving an optimal control problem requires the a priori choice of a numerical method. Many approaches do exist, that are either based on a direct discretization of the optimal control problem, resulting into a nonlinear programming problem, or based on the application of the Pontryagin Maximum Principle, reducing into a boundary value problem. The first class of approaches are called direct, and the second ones, based on the preliminary use of the Pontryagin maximum principle, are called indirect. It can be noted that indirect methods, although very precise, suffer from an important drawback: Unless one already has a good knowledge of the optimal solution, they are very difficult to initialize since they are extremely sensitive to the initial guess. Although many solutions exist in order to carefully initialize a shooting method (see \cite{Tr05,Tr12}), in most of engineering applications direct approaches are preferred due to their simplicity and robustness. Roughly speaking, direct methods consist of
\begin{enumerate}
\item discretizing first the cost and the differential system, in order to reduce the optimal control problem to a usual nonlinear minimization problem with constraints, also called nonlinear programming problem (NLP), with dimension inversely proportional to the smoothness of the discretization;
\item and then dualizing, by applying for instance a Lagrange-Newton method to the NLP, deriving the Karush-Kuhn-Tucker equations (KKT), also called discrete adjoint system, and applying a Newton method to solve the resulting optimality system.
\end{enumerate}
Many variants exist, \emph{e.g.}\ \cite{Betts98}).
In contrast, indirect methods consist of
\begin{enumerate}
\item first dualizing the optimal control problem to derive the adjoint system, by applying the Pontryagin Maximum Principle (PMP) (or, equivalently, the Lagrange multipliers necessary condition for optimality in infinite dimension),
\item and then discretizing, by applying a shooting method (that is, a Newton method composed with a numerical integration method).
\end{enumerate}
In shorter words, direct methods consist of 1) discretize, 2) dualize, and indirect methods consist of the converse: 1) dualize, 2) discretize. It is natural to wonder whether this diagram is commutative or not, under usual approximation assumptions.
Since the pioneering works of \cite{Ha00, Ro05}, it is well known by now that, in spite of usual assumptions ensuring consistency and stability, direct methods may diverge. In other words discretization and dualization do not commute in general. This is due to a complex interplay with the mesh, to the appearance of spurious highfrequencies ultimately causing the divergence (see \cite{Ha00} for very simple finite-dimensional linear quadratic problems and \cite{Zu05} for infinite-dimensional wave equations).
Several remedies and solutions exist, from which \cite{Bo06,GoRoKaFa08,Ha00,RoFa03} are a representative sample. For instance, the results of \cite{Ha00} assert the convergence of optimal control problems under specific smoothness and coercivity assumptions provided that the underlying discretization method be based on a Runge-Kutta method. However, the convergence order of the optimal control solution, which depends on the convergence order of the state and the resulting adjoint scheme, is reduced compared to the order of the Runge-Kutta method applied to the state system. Indeed, the discrete state and adjoint system constitutes a symplectic partitioned Runge-Kutta method for which order conditions on the Runge-Kutta coefficients are derived to preserve the convergence rates. Whereas in \cite{Ha00} the symplectic partitioned Runge-Kutta scheme for state and adjoint is explicitly derived, in a recent overview article \cite{SS14} a proof is given based on a relation between quadratic invariants (that are also naturally preserved by symplectic partitioned Runge-Kutta integrators) and the fulfillment of the KKT equations. The preservation of convergence rates is referred to as the Covector Mapping Principle (CMP) (see \emph{e.g.}\ \cite{GoRoKaFa08}). More precisely, the CMP is satisfied if there exists an order-preserving map between the adjoint variables corresponding to the dualized discrete problem (KKT) and the discretized dual problem (discretized PMP). For the class of Legendre pseudospectral methods the CMP is proven if additional closure conditions are satisfied (see \cite{GoRoKaFa08, RoFa03}), whereas for Runge-Kutta methods the CMP holds if the order conditions on the Runge-Kutta coefficients derived in \cite{Ha00} are satisfied.
For a detailed discussion on the commutation properties we refer to \cite{Ro05}.
While for general dynamical systems, many studies of discretizations of optimal control problems are based on Runge-Kutta methods (see \emph{e.g.}\ \cite{DoHa01,DoHa00,Ha01,HPS13,Wa07}), particularly for mechanical systems, much effort in designing numerical methods for the simulation and optimization of such systems has been put into schemes which are structure preserving in the sense that important qualitative features of the original dynamics are preserved in its discretization (for an overview on structure preserving integration methods see \emph{e.g.}\ \cite{HaLuWa02}). One special class of structure preserving integrators is the class of variational integrators, introduced in \cite{MaWe01,Su90}, which are symplectic and momentum-preserving and have an excellent long-time energy behavior. Variational integrators are based on a discrete variational formulation of the underlying system, \emph{e.g.}\ based on a discrete version of Hamilton's principle or of the Lagrange-d'Alembert principle for conservative \cite{LMOW04,LMOWe04} or dissipative \cite{Kane00} mechanical systems, respectively. They have been further extended to different kind of systems and applications, \emph{e.g.}\ towards constrained \cite{CoMa01,KoMaSu10,leyendecker07-2}, non smooth \cite{FMOW03}, multirate and multiscale \cite{LO12,StGr09,TaOwMa2010}, Lagrangian PDE systems \cite{Lew03, MPS98} and electric circuits \cite{OTCOM13}. In the cited works, typically quadrature rules of first or second order are used in order to approximate the action functional of the system. To design high order variational integrators, higher order quadrature rules based on polynomial collocation can be employed. Such so called Galerkin variational integrators have been introduced in \cite{MaWe01} and further studied in \cite{Ca13,HaLe13,Leok2011,O14,OS14}.
For numerically solving optimal control problems by means of a direct method, the use of variational integrators for the discretization of the problem has been proposed in \cite{CaJuOb12,DMOCC,ObJuMa10}. This approach, denoted by DMOC (Discrete Mechanics and Optimal Control), yields a finite-difference type discretization of the dynamical constraints of the problem which by construction preserves important structural properties of the system, like the evolution of momentum maps associated to symmetries of the Lagrangian or the energy behavior. For one class of Galerkin variational integrators, that is equivalent to the class of symplectic partitioned Runge-Kutta methods, the adjoint system and its convergence rates are analyzed in \cite{ObJuMa10}. It is shown that, in contrast to a discretization based on standard Runge-Kutta methods in \cite{Ha00}, the convergence order of the discrete adjoint system is the same as for the state system due to the symplecticity of the discretization scheme. In particular, we obtain the same symplectic-momentum scheme for both state and adjoint system, that means that discretization and dualization commute for this class of symplectic schemes and the CMP is satisfied.
For general classes of variational integrators, the commutation property is still an open question.
The contribution of this work is twofold:
\begin{enumerate}
\item We derive two different kinds of high order variational integrators based on different dimensions of the underling polynomial approximation (Section~\ref{sec:discrete}).
While the first well-known integrator is equivalent to a symplectic partitioned Runge-Kutta method, the second integrator, denoted as symplectic Galerkin integrator, yields a ``new'' method which in general, cannot be written as a standard symplectic Runge-Kutta scheme.
\item For the application of high order variational integrators to finite-dimensional optimal control problems posed with mechanical systems, we show the convergence of state and control variables and prove the commutation of discretization and dualization (Sections \ref{sec:conv} and \ref{sec:conmutation}).
\end{enumerate}
The paper is structured as follows: In Section~\ref{sec:ocmech} the optimal control problem for a mechanical system is introduced. Its discrete version is formulated in Section~\ref{sec:discrete} based on the derivation of two different kinds of high order variational integrators. The first main result is stated in Section~\ref{sec:conv}: Under specific assumptions on the problem setting we prove the convergence of the primal variables for an appropriate choice of the discrete controls (Theorem~\ref{thm:control:conv}). Along the lines of \cite{Ha01}, we demonstrate the influence of the control discretization on the convergence behavior by means of several examples. In Section~\ref{sec:conmutation} the discrete adjoint system for the symplectic Galerkin method is derived. It turns out that the reformulation of the variational scheme in Section~\ref{sec:discrete} simplifies the analysis. Whereas commutation of discretization and dualization for symplectic partitioned Runge-Kutta methods has already been shown in \cite{ObJuMa10}, we prove the same commutation property for the symplectic Galerkin discretization (Theorem~\ref{th:commutation}), which is the second main result of this work. In contrast to the discretization with Legendre pseudospectral methods or classical Runge-Kutta methods, no additional closure conditions (see \cite{GoRoKaFa08}) or conditions on the Runge-Kutta coefficients (see \cite{Ha00}) are required to satisfy the CMP, respectively. Furthermore, using the high order variational integrators presented here, not only the order but also the discretization scheme itself is preserved, \emph{i.e.}\ one yields the same schemes for the state and the adjoint system. We conclude with a summary of the results and an outlook for future work in Section~\ref{sec:conclusion}.
\section{Optimal control for mechanical systems}\label{sec:ocmech}
\subsection{Lagrangian dynamics}\label{subsec:Lag}
One of the main subjects of Geometric Mechanics is the study of dynamical systems governed by a Lagrangian. Typically, one considers a mechanical system with \emph{configuration manifold} $Q\subseteq \mathbb{R}^n$ together with a \emph{Lagrangian function} $L\colon TQ\to\mathbb{R}$, where the associated \emph{state space} $TQ$ describes the position $q$ and velocity $\dot{q}$ of a particle moving in the system. Usually, the Lagrangian takes the form of kinetic minus potential energy, $ L(q,\dot{q}) = K(q,\dot{q}) - V(q) = \frac12\,\dot{q}^T\cdot M(q)\cdot\dot{q} - V(q)$, for some (positive definite) \emph{mass matrix} $M(q)$.
A consequence of the \emph{principle of least action}, also known as \emph{Hamilton's principle}, establishes that the natural motions $q\colon[0,T]\to Q$ of the system are characterized by stationary solutions of the \emph{action}, thus, motions satisfying
\begin{equation}\label{eq:principle.hamilton}
\delta \int_0^T L(q(t),\dot{q}(t))\,\diff t = 0
\end{equation}
for zero initial and final variations $\delta q(0)=\delta q(T) =0$. The resulting equations of motion are the \emph{Euler-Lagrange equations} (refer to \cite{AbMa78}),
\begin{equation} \label{eq:EL-equation}
\dd[]t\pp[L]{\dot{q}} - \pp[L]{q} = 0 \,.
\end{equation}
When the Lagrangian is \emph{regular}, that is when the velocity Hessian matrix $\pp*[^2L]{\dot{q}^2}$ is non-degenerate, the Lagrangian induces a well defined map, the \emph{Lagrangian flow}, $F_L^t\colon TQ\to TQ$ by $F_L^t(q_0,\dot{q}_0) := (q(t),\dot{q}(t))$, where $q\in\mathcal{C}^2([0,T],Q)$ is the unique solution of the Euler-Lagrange equation \eqref{eq:EL-equation} with initial condition $(q_0,\dot{q}_0)\in TQ$. By means of the \emph{Legendre transform} $\mathop{\mathrm{leg}}\nolimits_L:(q,\dot{q})\in TQ\mapsto (q,p=\pp[L]{\dot{q}}|_{(q,\dot{q})})\in T^*Q$, where $T^*Q$ is the \emph{phase space} of positions $q$ and momenta $p$, one may transform the Lagrangian flow into the \emph{Hamiltonian flow} $F_H^t\colon T^*Q\to T^*Q$ defined by $F_H^t(q_0,p_0) := \mathop{\mathrm{leg}}\nolimits_L(q(t),\dot{q}(t))$.
Moreover, different preservation laws are present in these systems. For instance the Hamiltonian flow preserves the natural symplectic structure of $T^*Q$ and the total energy of the system, typically $H(q,p) = K(q,p) + V(q) = \frac12\,p^T\cdot M(q)^{-1}\cdot p - V(q)$ (here $K$ still denotes the kinetic energy, but depending on $p$ rather than on $\dot{q}$). Also, if the Lagrangian possess Lie group symmetries, then \emph{Noether's theorem} asserts that the associated momentum maps are conserved, like for instance the linear momentum and/or the angular momentum.
If external (non conservative) forces $F\colon (q,\dot{q})\in TQ \mapsto (q,F(q,\dot{q}))\in T^*Q$ are present in the system, Hamilton's principle~\eqref{eq:principle.hamilton} is replaced by the \emph{Lagrange-d'Alembert principle} seeking for curves that satisfy the relation
\begin{equation} \label{eq:principle.dalembert}
\delta \int_0^T L(q,\dot{q}) \,\diff t + \int_0^T F(q,\dot{q}) \cdot \delta q \,\diff t = 0
\end{equation}
for zero boundary variations $\delta q(0)=\delta q(T) =0$, where the second term is denoted as \emph{virtual work}. This principle leads to the \emph{forced Euler-Lagrange equations}
\begin{equation} \label{eq:ELF-equation}
\dd[]t\pp[L]{\dot{q}}-\pp[L]{q} = F(q,\dot{q}) \,.
\end{equation}
The forced version of Noether's theorem (see \emph{e.g.}\ \cite{MaWe01}) states that if the force acts orthogonal to the symmetry action, then momentum maps are still preserved by the flow. Otherwise, the change in momentum maps and energy is determined by the amount of forcing in the system.
\subsection{Optimal control problem}\label{subsec:ocp}
Since we are interested in optimally controlling Lagrangian systems, we assume that the mechanical system may be driven by means of some time dependent control parameter $u:[0,T]\rightarrow U$ with $U \subset \mathbb{R}^m$ being the \emph{control set}. Typically, the control appears as an extra variable in the external force such that in the following we consider forces of the form $F: TQ \times U \rightarrow T^*Q$ and we replace the right-hand side of \eqref{eq:ELF-equation} by the control dependent force term $F(q,\dot{q},u)$.
An optimal control problem for a mechanical system reads (also denoted as Lagranigan optimal control problem in \cite{ObJuMa10})
\begin{problem}[Lagrangian optimal control problem (LOCP)]\label{prob:locp}
\begin{subequations}\label{eq:LOCP}
\begin{equation}\label{eq:LOCP:cost}
\min_{q, \dot{q}, u} J(q,\dot{q},u) = \int_0^T C(q(t),\dot{q}(t),u(t))\,\diff t + \Phi(q(T),\dot{q}(T))
\end{equation}
subject to \begin{eqnarray}
\delta \int_0^T L(q(t),\dot{q}(t)) \, \diff t + \int_0^T F(q(t),\dot{q}(t),u(t))\cdot \delta q(t) \, \diff t &=& 0, \label{eq:LOCP_dA}\\
\label{eq:LOCP3} (q(0),\dot{q}(0)) &=& (q^0,\dot{q}^0),\label{eq:LOCP_ini}
\end{eqnarray}
\end{subequations}
with minimization over $q\in C^{1,1}([0,T],Q)= W^{2,\infty}([0,T],Q)$, $\dot{q} \in W^{1,\infty}([0,T],T_qQ)$ and $u\in L^\infty([0,T],U)$.
The interval length $T$ may either be fixed, or appear as degree of freedom in the optimization problem. Since any optimal control problem with free final time can easily be transformed into a problem with fixed final time (see \emph{e.g.}\ \cite{Gerdts12}), we assume the time $T$ to be fixed from now on. The control set $U\subset\mathbb{R}^m$ is assumed to be closed and convex, and the \emph{density cost function} $C\colon TQ\times U\mapsto \mathbb{R}$ and the \emph{final cost function} $\Phi\colon TQ \mapsto \mathbb{R}^n$ are continuously differentiable, being $\Phi$ moreover bounded from below.
\end{problem}
Henceforth we should assume that the Lagrangian is regular, \emph{i.e.}\ there is a (local) one-to-one correspondence between the velocity $\dot{q}$ and the momentum $p$ via the Legendre transform and its inverse
\[
p = \pp[L]{\dot{q}}(q,\dot{q}) \quad\text{and}\quad \dot{q} = \left(\pp[L]{\dot{q}}\right)^{-1}(q,p).
\]
Thus, the forced Euler-Lagrange equations \eqref{eq:ELF-equation} can be transformed into the partitioned system
\begin{equation}\label{eq:partsys}
\dot{q}(t)= f(q(t),p(t))\,, \quad \dot{p}(t)= g(q(t),p(t),u(t))
\end{equation}
with
\begin{equation}\label{eq:fg}
f(q,p) = \left(\pp[L]{\dot{q}}\right)^{-1}(q,p)\quad\text{and}\quad g(q,p,u)=\pp[L]q\left(q, f(q,p)\right) + F\left(q,f(q,p),u\right).
\end{equation}
With some abuse of notation we denote the force and the cost functions defined on $T^*Q\times U$ and $T^*Q$, respectively, by $F(q,p,u):=F(q,f(q,p),u)$, $C(q,p,u):=C(q,f(q,p),u)$ and $\Phi(q,p):=\Phi(q,f(q,p))$ such that Problem~\ref{prob:locp} can be formulated as an optimal control problem for the partitioned system \eqref{eq:partsys}.
\begin{problem}[Optimal control problem (OCP)]\label{prob:ocp}
\begin{subequations}\label{eq:OCP}
\begin{equation}\label{eq:OCP:cost}
\min_{q, p, u} J(q,p,u) = \int_0^T C(q(t),p(t),u(t))\,\diff t + \Phi(q(T),p(T))
\end{equation}
subject to \begin{align}
\dot{q}(t)&= f(q(t),p(t))\,, \quad q(0)=q^0\,, \label{eq:OCP2}\\
\dot{p}(t)&= g(q(t),p(t),u(t))\,, \quad p(0)=p^0, \label{eq:OCP3}
\end{align}
\end{subequations}
with minimization over $q\in W^{2,\infty}([0,T],Q)$, $p \in W^{1,\infty}([0,T],T_q^*Q)$ and $u\in L^\infty([0,T],U)$ and the functions $f\colon T^*Q \mapsto \mathbb{R}^n$, $g\colon T^*Q \times U \mapsto \mathbb{R}^n$ are assumed to be Lipschitz continuous.
\end{problem}
The first order necessary optimality conditions can be derived by means of the Hamiltonian for the optimal control problem given by
\begin{equation}
\mathcal{H}(q,p,u,\lambda,\psi,\rho_0) = \rho_0 C(q,p,u) + \lambda\cdot f(q,p) + \psi\cdot g(q,p,u)
\end{equation}
with $\rho_0 \in \mathbb{R}$ and $\lambda$ and $\psi$ are covectors in $\mathbb{R}^n$.
\begin{theorem}[Minimum Principle, \emph{e.g.}\ \cite{Gerdts12}]\label{th:pontryagin}
Let $(q^*,p^*,u^*)\in W^{2,\infty}([0,T],\allowbreak Q) \times W^{1,\infty}([0,T],T^*_{q^*}Q) \times L^{\infty}([0,T],U)$ be an optimal solution to Problem~\ref{prob:ocp}. Then there exist functions $\lambda \in W^{1,\infty}([0,T],\mathbb{R}^n)$ and $\psi \in W^{1,\infty}([0,T],\mathbb{R}^n)$ and
a constant $\rho_0\ge0$ satisfying $(\rho_0,\lambda,\psi)\not=(0,0,0)$ for all $t\in [0,T]$ such that
\begin{subequations}\label{eq:minprinc}
\begin{equation}\label{eq:min_ham}
\mathcal{H}(q^*(t),p^*(t),u^*(t),\lambda(t),\psi(t),\rho_0) = \min\limits_{u\in U} \mathcal{H}(q(t),p(t), u,\lambda(t),\psi(t),\rho_0)\,,
\end{equation}
for $t\in[0,T]$, and $(\rho_0,\lambda,\psi)$ solves the following initial value problem:
\begin{align}
\dot{\lambda}& = -\nabla_q\mathcal{H}(q^*,p^*,u^*,\lambda,\psi,\rho_0), &\lambda(T) =\rho_0 \nabla_q\Phi(q^*(T),p^*(T)),\label{eq:pontq}\\
\dot{\psi}& = -\nabla_p\mathcal{H}(q^*,p^*,u^*,\lambda,\psi,\rho_0), &\psi(T) = \rho_0 \nabla_p\Phi(q^*(T),p^*(T)).\label{eq:pontp}
\end{align}
\end{subequations}
\end{theorem}
The vectors $\lambda(t)$ and $\psi(t)$ are the \emph{costate} or the \emph{adjoint variables} of the Hamiltonian equations of optimal control. The scalar $\rho_0$ is called the \emph{abnormal multiplier}. In the abnormal case, it holds $\rho_0=0$, and otherwise the multiplier can be normalized to $\rho_0=1$. Since no final constraint on the state is present in the optimal control problem, the above principle holds true with $\rho_0=1$ (as proved for instance in \cite{Tr05}).
\begin{remark}
If $g$ is affine w.r.t. $u$, then the topologies can be taken as $L^2$ for the controls, $H^2=W^{2,2}$ on $q$ and $H^1=W^{1,2}$ on $p$, and the PMP would still be valid for these classes. Besides, optimal control problems where the optimal control is in $L^2$ but not in $L^\infty$ are very seldom. For instance, if one is able to express $u$ in function of $(q,p,\lambda,\psi)$, as for the assumptions of Theorem \ref{th:commutation}, then $u$ is clearly in $L^\infty$.
\end{remark}
\section{Discretization}\label{sec:discrete}
Since we are interested in solving optimal control problems by some kind of direct method, a discrete approximation of Problem~\ref{prob:ocp} is required. To this end, we first introduce two different variational integrators that we employ for the approximation of the control system given in \eqref{eq:OCP2}-\eqref{eq:OCP3}. Based on these discrete schemes, we derive the discrete approximations of the optimal control problem that can be solved by standard numerical optimization methods. The controls play no role in the derivations of the variational integrators, therefore we will omit temporarily the dependence of the external force $F$ on $u$, which will lighten the notation. The discrete schemes including the approximation of the controls are given in Section~\ref{subsec:docp}.
\subsection{Discrete Mechanics and Variational Integrators}\label{sec:dm}
Discrete Mechanics is, roughly speaking, a discretization of Geometric Mechanics theory. As a result, one obtains a set of discrete equations corresponding to the Euler-Lagrange equation \eqref{eq:ELF-equation} above but, instead of a direct discretization of the ODE, the latter are derived from a discretization of the base objects of the theory, the state space $TQ$, the Lagrangian $L$, etc. In fact, one seeks for a sequence $\{(t_0,q_0),(t_1,q_1),\dots,\allowbreak(t_N,q_N)\}$ that approximates the actual trajectory $q(t)$ of the system ($q_k\approx q(t_k)$), for a constant time-step $h=t_{k+1}-t_k>0$.
A \emph{variational integrator} is an iterative rule that outputs this sequence and it is derived in an analogous manner to the continuous framework. Given a discrete Lagrangian $L_d\colon Q\times Q\to\mathbb{R}$ and discrete forces $F^\pm_d\colon Q\times Q\to T^*Q$, which are in principle thought to approximate the continuous Lagrangian action and the virtual work, respectively, over a short time
\begin{subequations}
\begin{align}
L_d(q_k,q_{k+1}) &\approx \int_{t_k}^{t_{k+1}}L(q(t),\dot{q}(t))\diff t \,,\\
F_d^-(q_k,q_{k+1})\cdot \delta q_k + F_d^+(q_k,q_{k+1})\cdot \delta q_{k+1} &\approx \int_{t_k}^{t_{k+1}}F(q(t),\dot{q}(t))\cdot \delta q(t) \diff t \,,
\end{align}
\end{subequations}
one applies a variational principle to derive the well-known forced discrete Euler-Lagrange (DEL) equation,
\begin{equation} \label{eq:DEL}
D_1L_d(q_k,q_{k+1}) + D_2L_d(q_{k-1},q_k) + F_d^-(q_k,q_{k+1}) + F_d^+(q_{k-1},q_k) = 0 \,,
\end{equation}
for $k=1,\ldots,N-1$, where $D_i$ stands for the partial derivative with respect to the $i$-th component. The equation defines an integration rule of the type $(q_{k-1},q_k) \mapsto (q_k,q_{k+1})$, however if we define the pre- and post-momenta (also denoted as \emph{discrete Legendre transforms})
\begin{subequations}\label{eq:discrete.legendre.transform}
\begin{align}
p_k^- &:= -D_1L_d(q_k,q_{k+1})- F^-_d(q_k,q_{k+1}),\quad k=0,\ldots,N-1,\quad\text{and}\\
p_k^+& := D_2L_d(q_{k-1},q_k) + F^+_d(q_{k-1},q_k), \quad k=1,\ldots,N,
\end{align}
\end{subequations}
the discrete Euler-Lagrange equation \eqref{eq:DEL} is read as the momentum matching $p_k^-=p_k^+=:p_k$ and defines an integration rule of the type $(q_k,p_k)\mapsto(q_{k+1},p_{k+1})$.
The nice part of the story is that the integrators derived in this way naturally preserve (or nearly preserve) the quantities that are preserved in the continuous framework, the symplectic form, the total energy (for conservative systems) and, in presence of symmetries, the linear and/or angular momentum (for more details, see \cite{MaWe01}). Furthermore, other aspects of the continuous theory can be ``easily'' adapted, symmetry reduction \cite{CaCeDi12,CoJiMa12,IgMaMa08}, constraints \cite{JoMu09,KoMaSu10}, control forces \cite{CaJuOb12,ObJuMa10}, etc.
\subsection{High Order Variational Integrators}\label{sec:hovi}
High order variational integrators for time dependent or independent systems (HOVI[t]) are a class of integrators that, by using a multi-stage approach, aim at a high order accuracy on the computation of the natural trajectories of a mechanical system while preserving some intrinsic properties of such systems. In particular, symplectic-partitioned Runge-Kutta methods (spRK) and, what we call here, symplectic Galerkin methods (sG) are $s$-stage variational integrators of order up to $2s$.
The derivation of these methods follows the general scheme that comes next, the specifics of each particular case are detailed in the following subsections. For a fixed time step $h$, one considers a series of points $q_k$, refereed as macro-nodes. Between each couple of macro-nodes $(q_k,q_{k+1})$, one also considers a set of micro-data, the $s$ stages: For the particular cases of sG and spRK methods, we consider micro-nodes $Q_1,\dots,Q_s$ and micro-velocities $\dot{Q}_1,\dots,\dot{Q}_s$, respectively. Both macro-nodes and micro-data (micro-nodes or micro-velocities) are required to satisfy a variational principle, giving rise to a set of equations, which properly combined, define the final integrator.
Here and after, we will use the following notation: Let $0\leq c_1<\ldots<c_s\leq1$ denote a set of collocation points and consider the associated Lagrange polynomials and nodal weights, that is,
\[ l^j(t) := \prod_{i\neq j}\frac{t-c_i}{c_j-c_i} \qquad\text{and}\qquad b_j := \int_0^1l^j(t)\diff t \,, \]
respectively. Note that the pair of $(c_i,b_i)$'s define a quadrature rule and that, for appropriate $c_i$'s, this rule may be a Gaussian-like quadrature, for instance, Gauss-Legendre, Gauss-Lobatto, Radau or Chebyshev.
Now, for the sake of simplicity and independently of the method, we will use the same notation for the nodal coefficients. We define for spRK and sG, respectively,
\begin{equation}\label{eq:coeff_ab}
a_{ij} := \int_0^{c_i}l^j(t)\diff t \qquad\text{and}\qquad a_{ij} := \dd[l^j]t\Big|_{c_i} \,.
\end{equation}
Moreover, for spRK, we will also use the nodal weights and coefficients $(\bar b_j,\bar a_{ij})$ given by Equation \eqref{eq:spRK.coeff} and, for sG, the source and target coefficients
\[ \alpha^j := l^j(0) \qquad\text{and}\qquad \beta^j:=l^j(1) \,. \]
Finally, if $L$ denotes a Lagrangian from $\mathbb{R}^n\times\mathbb{R}^n$ to $\mathbb{R}$ coupled with an external force $F\colon(q,\dot{q})\in\mathbb{R}^n\times\mathbb{R}^n\mapsto(q,F(q,\dot{q}))\in\mathbb{R}^n\times\mathbb{R}^n$, then we define
\[ P_i := \pp[L]{\dot{q}}\Big|_i = \pp[L]{\dot{q}}\Big|_{(Q_i,\dot{Q}_i)} \qquad\text{and}\qquad \dot{P}_i := \pp[L]{q}\Big|_i + F_i = \pp[L]{q}\Big|_{(Q_i,\dot{Q}_i)} + F(Q_i,\dot{Q}_i) \,, \]
where $(Q_i,\dot{Q}_i)$ are couples of micro-nodes and micro-velocities given by each method. Besides, $D_i$ will stand for the partial derivative with respect to the $i$-th component.
\subsubsection{Symplectic-Partitioned Runge-Kutta Methods}\label{sec:sprk}
Although the variational de\-ri\-va\-tion of spRK methods in the framework of Geometric Mechanics is an already known fact (see \cite{MaWe01} for an ``intrinsic'' derivation, as the current, or \cite{HaLuWa02} for a ``constrained'' one), both based on the original works of \cite{Su90,SaCa94}, we present it here again in order to ease the understanding of and the comparison with sG methods below.
Given a point $q_0\in\mathbb{R}^n$ and vectors $\{\dot{Q}_i\}_{i=1,\dots,s}\subset\mathbb{R}^n$, we define the polynomial curves
\[ \dot{\mathcal{Q}}(t) := \sum_{j=1}^sl^j(t/h)\dot{Q}_j \qquad\text{and}\qquad \mathcal{Q}(t) := q_0+h\sum_{j=1}^s\int_0^{t/h}l^j(\tau)\mathrm{d}\tau\dot{Q}_j \,. \]
We have
\begin{equation} \label{eq:spRK.node.rel}
\dot{Q}_i = \dot{Q}(h\cdot c_i) \quad\text{and}\quad Q_i := \mathcal{Q}(h\cdot c_i) = q_0 + h\sum_{j=1}^sa_{ij}\dot{Q}_j \,.
\end{equation}
Note that the polynomial curve $\mathcal{Q}$ is uniquely determined by $q_0$ and $\{\dot{Q}_i\}_{i=1,\dots,s}$. In fact, it is the unique polynomial curve $\mathcal{Q}$ of degree $s$ such that $\mathcal{Q}(0)=q_0$ and $\dot{\mathcal{Q}}(h\cdot c_i)=\dot{Q}_i$. However, if we define the configuration point
\begin{equation} \label{eq:spRK.target.node}
q_1 := \mathcal{Q}(h\cdot1) = q_0 + h\sum_{j=1}^sb_j\dot{Q}_j
\end{equation}
and consider it fixed, then $\mathcal{Q}$ is uniquely determined by $q_0$, $q_1$ and the $\dot{Q}_i$'s but one. Namely, take any $1\leq i_0 \leq s$ such that $b_{i_0}\neq0$ and fix it, then
\[ \dot{Q}_{i_0} = \left(\frac{q_1-q_0}h-\sum_{j\neq i_0}b_j\dot{Q}_j\right)/b_{i_0} \,. \]
We now define the multi-vector discrete Lagrangian
\begin{equation}\label{eq:multivecL}
L_d(\dot{Q}_1,\dots,\dot{Q}_s) := h\sum_{i=1}^sb_iL(Q_i,\dot{Q}_i)
\end{equation}
and the multi-vector discrete force
\[ F_d(\dot{Q}_1,\dots,\dot{Q}_s)\cdot(\delta Q_1,\dots,\delta Q_s) := h\sum_{i=1}^sb_iF(Q_i,\dot{Q}_i)\cdot\delta Q_i \,. \]
Although not explicitly stated, they both depend also on $q_0$. If we write the micro-node variations $\delta Q_i$ in terms of the micro-velocity variations $\delta\dot{Q}_i$ (by definition \eqref{eq:spRK.node.rel}), we have that the multi-vector discrete force is
\[ F_d(\dot{Q}_1,\dots,\dot{Q}_s)\cdot(\delta Q_1,\dots,\delta Q_s) = h^2\sum_{j=1}^s\sum_{i=1}^sb_ia_{ij}F(Q_i,\dot{Q}_i)\cdot\delta \dot{Q}_j \,. \]
The two-point discrete Lagrangian is then
\begin{equation}\label{eq:twopointL}
L_d(q_0,q_1) := \mathop{\mathrm{ext}}_{\mathcal{P}^s([0,h],\mathbb{R}^n,q_0,q_1)}L_d(\dot{Q}_1,\dots,\dot{Q}_s)
\end{equation}
where $\mathcal{P}^s([0,h],\mathbb{R}^n,q_0,q_1)$ is the space of polynomials $\mathcal{Q}$ of order $s$ from $[0,h]$ to $\mathbb{R}^n$ such that $\mathcal{Q}(0)=q_0$ and $\mathcal{Q}(h)=q_1$ and the vectors $\dot{Q}_i$'s determine such polynomials as discussed above. The so called ``extremal'' is realized by a polynomial $\mathcal{Q}\in\mathcal{P}^s([0,h],\mathbb{R}^n,q_0,q_1)$ such that
\begin{equation} \label{eq:DEL.micro.spRK}
\delta L_d(\dot{Q}_1,\dots,\dot{Q}_s)\cdot(\delta \dot{Q}_1,\dots,\delta \dot{Q}_s) + F_d(\dot{Q}_1,\dots,\dot{Q}_s)\cdot(\delta Q_1,\dots,\delta Q_s) = 0
\end{equation}
for any variations $(\delta \dot{Q}_1,\dots,\delta \dot{Q}_s)$, taking into account that $\delta q_0=\delta q_1=0$ and that $\delta \dot{Q}_{i_0} = \sum_{j\neq i_0}\pp*[\dot{Q}_{i_0}]{\dot{Q}_j}\delta \dot{Q}_j$. For convenience, the previous equation \eqref{eq:DEL.micro.spRK} is developed afterwards.
The two-point discrete forward and backward forces are then
\begin{equation} \label{eq:twopoint_dF}
F_d^\pm(q_0,q_1)\cdot\delta(q_0,q_1) := h\sum_{i=1}^sb_iF(Q_i,\dot{Q}_i)\cdot\pp[Q_i]{q_\pm}\delta q_\pm \,,
\end{equation}
where $q_-=q_0$ and $q_+=q_1$. Using the previous relations, we may write
\[ F_d^- = h\sum_{i=1}^sb_i(1-a_{ii_0}/b_{i_0})F_i \qquad\text{and}\qquad F_d^+ = h\sum_{i=1}^sb_ia_{ii_0}/b_{i_0}F_i \,. \]
By the momenta-matching rule \eqref{eq:discrete.legendre.transform}, we have that
\begin{eqnarray*}
-p_0 &=& -D_{i_0}L_d(\dot{Q}_1,\dots,\dot{Q}_s)/(hb_{i_0}) + D_{q_0}L_d(\dot{Q}_1,\dots,\dot{Q}_s) + F_d^- \,,\\
p_1 &=& D_{i_0}L_d(\dot{Q}_1,\dots,\dot{Q}_s)/(hb_{i_0}) + F_d^+\,.
\end{eqnarray*}
where $D_{q_0}$ stands for the partial derivative with respect to $q_0$. Combining both equations, we obtain that
\[ D_{i_0}L_d + h^2\sum_{i=1}^sb_ia_{ii_0}F_i = hb_{i_0}p_1 \qquad\text{and}\qquad p_1 = p_0 + D_{q_0}L_d + h\sum_{i=1}^sb_iF_i \,. \]
Coming back to Equation \eqref{eq:DEL.micro.spRK}, we have that
\begin{align*}
0 &= \delta L_d(\dot{Q}_1,\dots,\dot{Q}_s)\cdot(\delta \dot{Q}_1,\dots,\delta \dot{Q}_s) + F_d(\dot{Q}_1,\dots,\dot{Q}_s)\cdot(\delta Q_1,\dots,\delta Q_s)\\
&= \sum_{j\neq i_0}\left( D_jL_d + h^2\sum_{i=1}^sb_ia_{ij}F_i + \pp[\dot{Q}_{i_0}]{\dot{Q}_j}\left( D_{i_0}L_d + h^2\sum_{i=1}^sb_ia_{ii_0}F_i \right) \right)\delta \dot{Q}_j \,.
\end{align*}
Therefore, for $j\neq i_0$, we have that
\[ D_jL_d + h^2\sum_{i=1}^sb_ia_{ij}F_i = b_j/b_{i_0}\cdot\left( D_{i_0}L_d + h^2\sum_{i=1}^sb_ia_{ii_0}F_i \right) \,. \]
Thus, the integrator is defined by
\begin{subequations}
\begin{gather}
D_jL_d(\dot{Q}_1,\dots,\dot{Q}_s) + h^2\sum_{i=1}^sb_ia_{ij}F_i = hb_jp_1 \,, \\
q_1 = q_0 + h\sum_{j=1}^sb_j\dot{Q}_j \,, \\
p_1 = p_0 + D_{q_0}L_d(\dot{Q}_1,\dots,\dot{Q}_s) + h\sum_{i=1}^sb_iF_i \,.
\end{gather}
\end{subequations}
Besides, using the definition of the discrete Lagrangian, we have
\begin{eqnarray*}
D_jL_d(\dot{Q}_1,\dots,\dot{Q}_s) + h^2\sum_{i=1}^sb_ia_{ij}F_i
&=& h^2\sum_{i=1}^sb_ia_{ij}\dot{P}_i + hb_jP_j \,, \\
D_{q_0}L_d(\dot{Q}_1,\dots,\dot{Q}_s) + h\sum_{i=1}^sb_iF_i
&=& h\sum_{i=1}^sb_i\dot{P}_i \,.
\end{eqnarray*}
Therefore, we may write
\begin{gather*}
P_j = p_0 + h\sum_{i=1}^sb_i(1-a_{ij}/b_j)\dot{P}_i = p_0 + h\sum_{i=1}^s\bar a_{ji}\dot{P}_i \,, \\
p_1 = p_0 + h\sum_{i=1}^sb_i\dot{P}_i = p_0 + h\sum_{i=1}^s\bar b_i\dot{P}_i \,,
\end{gather*}
were $\bar a_{ij}$ and $\bar b_i$ are given by
\begin{equation} \label{eq:spRK.coeff}
b_i\bar a_{ij}+\bar b_ja_{ji} = b_i\bar b_j \,,\quad b_i = \bar b_i\,.
\end{equation}
In summary, the equations that define the spRK integrator (with forces), are together with \eqref{eq:spRK.coeff}
\begin{subequations} \label{eq:spRK}
\begin{align}
q_1 =& q_0 + h\sum_{j=1}^sb_j\dot{Q}_j\,, & p_1 =& p_0 + h\sum_{j=1}^s\bar b_j\dot{P}_j\,,\label{eq:spRK_1}\\
Q_i =& q_0 + h\sum_{j=1}^sa_{ij}\dot{Q}_j\,, & P_i =& p_0 + h\sum_{j=1}^s\bar a_{ij}\dot{P}_j\,,\label{eq:spRK_2}\\
P_i =& \pp[L]{\dot{q}}(Q_i,\dot{Q}_i)\,, & \dot{P}_i =& \pp[L]{q}(Q_i,\dot{Q}_i) + F(Q_i,\dot{Q}_i) \,.\label{eq:spRK_3}
\end{align}
\end{subequations}
\subsubsection{Symplectic Galerkin Methods}\label{sec:sg}
Galerkin methods are a class of methods to transform a problem given by a continuous operator (such as a differential operator) to a discrete problem. As such, spRK methods fall into the scope of this technique and could be also classified as ``symplectic Galerkin'' methods. However, we want to stress on the difference between what is called spRK in the literature and what we refer here as sG. The wording should not be confused by the one used in \cite{MaWe01}.
Given points $\{Q_i\}_{i=1,\dots,s}\subset\mathbb{R}^n$, we define the polynomial curves
\[ \mathcal{Q}(t) := \sum_{j=1}^sl^j(t/h)Q_j \qquad\text{and}\qquad \dot{\mathcal{Q}}(t) := \frac1h\sum_{j=1}^s\dot l^j(t/h)Q_j \,. \]
We have
\[ Q_i = \mathcal{Q}(h\cdot c_i) \quad\text{and}\quad \dot{Q}_i := \dot{\mathcal{Q}}(h\cdot c_i) = \frac1h\sum_{j=1}^sa_{ij}Q_j \,. \]
Note that the polynomial curve $\mathcal{Q}$ is uniquely determined by the points $\{Q_i\}_{i=1,\dots,s}$. In fact, it is the unique polynomial curve $\mathcal{Q}$ of degree $s-1$ such that $\mathcal{Q}(h\cdot c_i)=Q_i$. However, if we define the configuration points
\begin{equation} \label{sG.source-target.nodes}
q_0 := \mathcal{Q}(h\cdot0) = \sum_{j=1}^s\alpha^jQ_j \qquad\text{and}\qquad q_1 := \mathcal{Q}(h\cdot1) = \sum_{j=1}^s\beta^jQ_j
\end{equation}
and consider them fixed, then $\mathcal{Q}$ is uniquely determined by $q_0$, $q_1$ and the $Q_i$'s but a couple. For instance, we may consider $Q_1$ and $Q_s$ as functions of the others, since the relations \eqref{sG.source-target.nodes} define a system of linear equations where the coefficient matrix has determinant $\gamma:=\alpha^1\beta^s-\alpha^s\beta^1\neq0$ (if and only if $c_1\neq c_s$). More precisely,
\[
\left(
\begin{array}{c}
Q_1\\
Q_s
\end{array}
\right)
=
\frac1\gamma
\left(
\begin{array}{cc}
\beta^s & -\alpha^s\\
-\beta^1 & \alpha^1
\end{array}
\right)
\left(
\begin{array}{c}
q_0-\sum_{j=2}^{s-1}\alpha^jQ_j\\
q_1-\sum_{j=2}^{s-1}\beta^jQ_j
\end{array}
\right) \,.
\]
We now define the multi-point discrete Lagrangian
\begin{equation}\label{eq:multipointL}
L_d(Q_1,\dots,Q_s) := h\sum_{i=1}^sb_iL(Q_i,\dot{Q}_i)
\end{equation}
and the multi-vector discrete force
\[ F_d(Q_1,\dots,Q_s)\cdot(\delta Q_1,\dots,\delta Q_s) := h\sum_{i=1}^sb_iF(Q_i,\dot{Q}_i)\cdot\delta Q_i \,. \]
The two-point discrete Lagrangian is then
\begin{equation} \label{eq:twopointL_sG}
L_d(q_0,q_1) := \mathop{\mathrm{ext}}_{\mathcal{P}^s([0,h],\mathbb{R}^n,q_0,q_1)}L_d(Q_1,\dots,Q_s)
\end{equation}
where $\mathcal{P}^s([0,h],\mathbb{R}^n,q_0,q_1)$ is the space of polynomials $\mathcal{Q}$ of order $s$ from $[0,h]$ to $\mathbb{R}^n$ such that the points $Q_i$'s determine such polynomials as discussed above. The so called ``extremal'' is realized by a polynomial $\mathcal{Q}\in\mathcal{P}^s([0,h],\mathbb{R}^n,q_0,q_1)$ such that
\begin{equation} \label{eq:DEL.micro.sG}
\delta L_d(Q_1,\dots,Q_s)\cdot(\delta Q_1,\dots,\delta Q_s) + F_d(Q_1,\dots,Q_s)\cdot(\delta Q_1,\dots,\delta Q_s) = 0
\end{equation}
for any variations $(\delta Q_1,\dots,\delta Q_s)$, taking into account that $\delta q_0=\delta q_1=0$ and that $\delta Q_i = \sum_{j=2}^{s-1}\pp*[Q_i]{Q_j}\delta Q_j$, $i=1,s$.
For convenience, the previous equation \eqref{eq:DEL.micro.sG} is developed afterwards.
The two-point discrete forward and backward forces are then formally defined by Equation \eqref{eq:twopoint_dF}. Using the previous relations, we may write
\[ F_d^- = h(\beta_sb_1F_1-\beta_1b_sF_s)/\gamma \qquad\text{and}\qquad F_d^+ = h(\alpha_1b_sF_s-\alpha_sb_1F_1)/\gamma \,. \]
By the momenta-matching rule \eqref{eq:discrete.legendre.transform}, we have that
\begin{align*}
-p_0 &= \phantom{-} \beta^s/\gamma \cdot (D_1L_d + hb_1F_1) - \beta^1/\gamma \cdot (D_sL_d + hb_sF_s) \ \ \text{and}\\
p_1 &= -\alpha^s/\gamma \cdot (D_1L_d + hb_1F_1) + \alpha^1/\gamma \cdot (D_sL_d + hb_sF_s) \,.
\end{align*}
By a linear transformation of both equations, we obtain
\begin{align*}
D_1L_d(Q_1,\dots,Q_s) + hb_1F_1 &= -\alpha^1p_0 + \beta^1p_1 \ \ \text{and}\\
D_sL_d(Q_1,\dots,Q_s) + hb_sF_s &= -\alpha^sp_0 + \beta^sp_1 \,.
\end{align*}
Coming back to Equation \eqref{eq:DEL.micro.sG}, we have that
\begin{align*}
0 &= \left(\delta L_d(Q_1,\dots,Q_s) + F_d(Q_1,\dots,Q_s)\right)\cdot(\delta Q_1,\dots,\delta Q_s) \\
&= \sum_{j=2}^{s-1}\left[(D_1L_d+hb_1F_1)\pp[Q_1]{Q_j} + (D_jL_d+hb_jF_j) + (D_sL_d+hb_sF_s)\pp[Q_s]{Q_j}\right]\delta Q_j \,.
\end{align*}
Therefore, for $j=2,\dots,s-1$, we obtain
\begin{align*}
\gamma (D_jL_d+hb_jF_j)
=\,& (\alpha^j\beta^s\!-\!\alpha^s\beta^j)(D_1L_d+hb_1F_1) + (\alpha^1\beta^j\!-\!\alpha^j\beta^1)(D_sL_d+hb_sF_s)\\
=\,& (\alpha^1\beta^s\!-\!\alpha^s\beta^1)(\beta^jp_1\!-\!\alpha^jp_0) \,.
\end{align*}
Thus, the integrator is defined by
\begin{subequations}
\begin{gather}
\label{eq:sG.DEL}
D_jL_d(Q_1,\dots,Q_s) + hb_jF_j = -\alpha^jp_0 + \beta^jp_1 \,,\ j=1,\dots,s;\\
q_0 = \sum_{j=1}^s\alpha^jQ_j \qquad\text{and}\qquad q_1 = \sum_{j=1}^s\beta^jQ_j
\end{gather}
\end{subequations}
Besides, using the definition of the discrete Lagrangian, we have
\begin{eqnarray*}
D_jL_d(Q_1,\dots,Q_s)
&=& h\sum_{i=1}^sb_i\left( \pp[L]{q}\Big|_i\pp[Q_i]{\dot{Q}_j} + \pp[L]{\dot{q}}\Big|_i\pp[\dot{Q}_i]{\dot{Q}_j} \right) \\
D_jL_d(Q_1,\dots,Q_s) + hb_jF_j
&=& hb_j\dot{P}_j + \sum_{j=1}^sb_ia_{ij}P_i \,.
\end{eqnarray*}
Therefore, we may simply write
\[ hb_j\dot{P}_j + \sum_{j=1}^sb_ia_{ij}P_i = -\alpha^jp_0 + \beta^jp_1 \,. \]
In summary and for a proper comparison, we write the equations that define the sG integrator (with forces) in a pRK way, that is
\begin{subequations} \label{eq:sG}
\begin{align}
q_0 =& \sum_{j=1}^s\alpha^jQ_j\,, & q_1 =& \sum_{j=1}^s\beta^jQ_j\,,\label{eq:sG_1}\\
\dot{Q}_i =& \frac1h\sum_{j=1}^sa_{ij}Q_j\,, & \dot{P}_i =& \frac{\beta^ip_1-\alpha^ip_0}{h\bar b_i} + \frac1h\sum_{j=1}^s\bar a_{ij}P_j\,,\label{eq:sG_2}\\
P_i =& \pp[L]{\dot{q}}(Q_i,\dot{Q}_i)\,, & \dot{P}_i =& \pp[L]{q}(Q_i,\dot{Q}_i) + F(Q_i,\dot{Q}_i)\,,\label{eq:sG_3}
\end{align}
\end{subequations}
where $b_ia_{ij}+\bar b_j\bar a_{ji}=0$ and $b_i=\bar b_j$.
We remark that Equation \eqref{eq:sG.DEL} generalizes the ones obtained in \cite{CaJuOb12,Le04}, where the collocation points are chosen such that $c_1=0$ and $c_s=1$, which is a rather particular case.
\subsubsection{Similarities and differences between spRK and sG}\label{sec:rel}
As already mentioned, both methods can be considered of Galerkin type. In this sense, spRK and sG could be refereed as a symplectic Galerkin integrators of 1st and 0th kind, respectively, since spRK is derived from the 1st derivative of an extremal polynomial and sG from the polynomial itself. At this point, a very natural question could arise: Are spRK and sG actually two different integrator schemes? Even though the derivations of both methods are quite similar, they are in general different (although they could coincide for particular choices of the Lagrangian, the collocation points and the integral quadrature). A weak but still fair argument to support this is that, at each step, spRK relies on the determination of the micro-velocities $\dot{Q}_i$, while sG does so on the micro-nodes $Q_i$. All the other ``unknowns'' are then computed from the determined micro-data.
In the simplest of the cases, that is, the case where one considers a Lagrangian of the form kinetic minus potential energy, $L(q,\dot{q}) = \frac12\dot{q}^TM\dot{q} - U(q)$, with $M$ a constant mass matrix; $s=2$ micro-nodes (inner-stages); and Lobatto's quadrature, $c_1=0$, $c_2=1$; one may show that both schemes, spRK \eqref{eq:spRK} and sG \eqref{eq:sG}, reduce to the well-known \emph{leap-frog \emph{or} Verlet method}. They will differ when the previous main assumptions are violated, for instance if $M$ is not constant or the quadrature is other than Lobatto's.
\begin{example}
We consider a Lagrangian with a scalar mass matrix dependent on the configuration, that is, a Lagrangian of the form $L(q,\dot{q}) = \frac12\lambda(q)\|\dot{q}\|^2 - V(q)$, with $\lambda\colon Q\to\mathbb{R}$. Under this assumption and noting $\lambda_{1/2} := \frac{\lambda_0+\lambda_1}2$, $(\nabla)\lambda_i := (\nabla)\lambda(q_i)$, $(\nabla)V_i := (\nabla)V(q_i)$, $i=0,1$, the spRK scheme \eqref{eq:spRK} as well as the the sG scheme \eqref{eq:sG} reduce to
\begin{align*}
p_{1/2} =\,& p_0 + \frac{h}2\left(\boxed{\frac{\nabla\lambda_0}{2\lambda_{\mathsf a}^2}}\|p_{1/2}\|^2-\nabla V_0\right) \,,\\
q_1 =\,& q_0 + \frac{h}2\left(\boxed{\frac1{\lambda_{\mathsf a}}+\frac1{\lambda_{\mathsf b}}}\right)p_{1/2} \,,\\
p_1 =\,& p_{1/2} + \frac{h}2\left(\boxed{\frac{\nabla\lambda_1}{2\lambda_{\mathsf b}^2}}\|p_{1/2}\|^2-\nabla V_1\right) \,,
\end{align*}
with a slight difference in the subindexes appearing in the framed factors. While in the spRK scheme, ${\mathsf a}=0$ and ${\mathsf b}=1$; in the sG scheme ${\mathsf a}={\mathsf b}=1/2$. It is important to note that, even though the difference is small, it makes both schemes certainly different. Besides notice that the first two equations define $p_{1/2}$ and $q_1$ implicitly and that the whole set reduces to the Verlet method for a constant $\lambda$. Indeed, it is shown in \cite{Ca13,O14} that for a Lagrangian with constant mass matrix and Lobatto quadrature rule, the sG and the spRK method coincide.
\end{example}
\subsubsection{Order of the schemes}
With respect to the accuracy of the schemes, for any Gaussian--like quadrature (Gauss-Legendre, Gauss-Lobatto, Radau and Chebyshev) and any method (spRK and sG), the schemes have a convergence order up to $2s$ (which is only attained by the combination Gauss-Lobatto together with spRK) but no lower than $2s-2$, being $s$ the number of internal stages, see Table \ref{tab:comparison}. We emphasize that these orders have been determined numerically experimenting with several ``toy examples'' for which exact solutions are known, \emph{e.g.}\ the harmonic oscillator and the 2 body problem (see Section \ref{sec:conmutation}), however they coincide with the known analytic results when available, that is spRK together with the Gauss-Legendre or Gauss-Lobatto quadratures (see \emph{e.g.}\ \cite{HaLuWa02}).
\begin{table}[h]
\centering
\begin{tabular}{cc|c|c|}
\cline{3-4}
& & spRK & sG \\
\cline{1-4}
\multicolumn{2}{|c|}{micro-data} & $\dot{Q}_i$ & $Q_i$ \\
\cline{1-4}
\multicolumn{2}{|c|}{polynomial degree} & $s$ & $s-1$ \\
\cline{1-4}
\multicolumn{2}{|c|}{variational eq.'s} & $s+1$ & $s$ \\
\cline{1-4}
\multicolumn{2}{|c|}{extra equations} & $1$ & $2$ \\
\cline{1-4}
\multicolumn{1}{|c|}{\multirow{4}{*}{quadrature}} & Gauss-Legendre & $2s$ & $2s-2$ \\
\cline{2-4}
\multicolumn{1}{|c|}{\multirow{4}{*}{}} & Gauss-Lobatto & $2s-2$ & $2s-2$ \\
\cline{2-4}
\multicolumn{1}{|c|}{\multirow{4}{*}{}} & Radau & $2s-1$ & $2s-2$ \\
\cline{2-4}
\multicolumn{1}{|c|}{\multirow{4}{*}{}} & Chebyshev & $2s-2$ & $2s-2$ \\
\cline{1-4}
& & \multicolumn{2}{|c|}{order method} \\
\cline{3-4}
\end{tabular}
\caption{Comparison of $s$-stage variational integrators.}
\label{tab:comparison}
\end{table}
\subsection{Discrete optimal control problem}\label{subsec:docp}
For the discretization of the optimal control problem~\ref{prob:locp}, we employ the class of high order variational integrators. By choosing an appropriate approximation $J_d$ of the cost functional $J$, the general discrete Lagrangian optimal control problem as discretization of the Langrangian optimal control problem~\ref{prob:locp} reads (see also \cite{ObJuMa10})
\begin{problem}[Discrete Lagrangian optimal control problem]\label{probd:locp}
\begin{subequations}\label{eq:gDLOCP}
\begin{equation}\label{eq:gDLOCP1}
\min_{\{q_k,u_k\}_{k=0}^N} J_d(\{q_k,u_k\}_{k=0}^N)
\end{equation}
subject to
\begin{align}
q_0 &= q^0,\label{eq:gDLOCP2}\\
D_2L(q^0,\dot{q}^0)+D_1L_d(q_0,q_1) + F_0^-& = 0,\label{eq:gDLOCP3}\\
D_2 L_d (q_{k-1},q_k) + D_1 L_d (q_k,q_{k+1}) + F_d^+(q_{k-1},q_k) + F_d^-(q_k,q_{k+1}) &= 0,\label{eq:gDLOCP4}
\end{align}
\end{subequations}
for $k=1,\dots, N-1$ and where Equation~\eqref{eq:gDLOCP4} is the forced discrete Euler-Lagrange equation defined in \eqref{eq:DEL} and Equations~\eqref{eq:gDLOCP2}-\eqref{eq:gDLOCP3} correspond to the initial condition~\eqref{eq:LOCP_ini} expressed by means of the discrete Legendre transform \eqref{eq:discrete.legendre.transform}. Here, the control trajectory $u$ is approximated by the discrete values $u_k$, $k=0,\ldots,N$, such that $u_k \approx u(t_k)$. Note that for the controlled case, the $F_d^\pm$ are dependent on $u_k$. To specify the discrete optimal control problem, in particular, the approximation of the control parameter $u$ and the cost functional $J$, we focus on the high order variational integrators derived in Section~\ref{sec:hovi}, namely the spRK and the sG method, and find a discrete version of the more general optimal control problem~\ref{prob:ocp}.
\end{problem}
As for the approximation of $q(t)$ and $\dot{q}(t)$, we also use a polynomial for the approximation of the control function $u(t)$ on $[0,h]$. For a given set of collocation points $0\leq c_1<\ldots<c_s\leq1$ and given control points $\{ U_i \}_{i=1,\ldots,s}\subset U$ we define the polynomial of degree $s-1$
\[ \mathcal{U}(t):=\sum_{j=1}^s l^j(t/h)U_j \]
such that $U_i = \mathcal{U}(h\cdot c_i),\, i=1,\ldots,s$. Note that the control polynomial $\mathcal{U}(t)$ has the same degree as the polynomial $\mathcal{Q}(t)$ for the sG integrator, whereas for the spRK integrator it coincides with the polynomial degree of $\dot{\mathcal{Q}}(t)$. To take in consideration the control dependent force in the previous derivation of the spRK and the sG schemes into account, we replace in the definitions for $F_d^\pm$ in Equation \eqref{eq:twopoint_dF} the external force $F_i=F(Q_i,\dot{Q}_i)$ by $F_i=F(Q_i,\dot{Q}_i,U_i)$. Furthermore, for a regular Lagrangian and by using the definitions for $f$ and $g$ in \eqref{eq:fg}, we can write Equations~\eqref{eq:spRK_3} and \eqref{eq:sG_3} as
\[f(Q_i, P_i) = \left(\pp[L]{\dot{q}}\right)^{-1}(Q_i,P_i)\,, \quad g(Q_i, P_i,U_i) = \pp[L]{q}(Q_i,\dot{Q}_i) + F(Q_i,\dot{Q}_i,U_i) \]
such that the spRK scheme can be written as
\begin{subequations} \label{eq:spRKred}
\begin{align}
q_1 =& q_0 + h\sum_{j=1}^sb_j f(Q_j,P_j)\,, & p_1 =& p_0 + h\sum_{j=1}^s\bar b_jg(Q_j,P_j,U_j)\,,\label{eq:spRK_red1}\\
Q_i =& q_0 + h\sum_{j=1}^sa_{ij} f(Q_j,P_j)\,, & P_i =& p_0 + h\sum_{j=1}^s\bar a_{ij}g(Q_j,P_j,U_j)\,,\label{eq:spRK_red2}
\end{align}
\end{subequations}
with $b_i\bar a_{ij}+\bar b_ja_{ji} = b_i\bar b_j$ and $b_i=\bar b_j$
and the sG scheme reduces to
\begin{subequations} \label{eq:sG_general}
\begin{align}
q_0 =& \sum_{j=1}^s\alpha^jQ_j\,, & q_1 =& \sum_{j=1}^s\beta^jQ_j\,,\\
f(Q_i,P_i) =& \frac{1}{h}\sum_{j=1}^sa_{ij}Q_j\,, & g(Q_i,P_i,U_i) =& \frac{\beta^ip_1-\alpha^ip_0}{h\bar b_i} + \frac1h\sum_{j=1}^s\bar a_{ij}P_j\,,
\end{align}
\end{subequations}
where $b_ia_{ij}+\bar b_j\bar a_{ji}=0$ and $b_i=\bar b_j$.
Remember that the coefficients $a_{ij}$ are different for the two schemes \eqref{eq:spRKred} and \eqref{eq:sG_general} (see \eqref{eq:coeff_ab}).
To approximate the cost functional $\int_0^h C(q(t),p(t),u(t))\,\diff t$ in \eqref{eq:OCP:cost} we employ the same quadrature rule that we use to approximate the action on $[0,h]$ (\emph{cf.}\ \eqref{eq:multivecL} and \eqref{eq:multipointL}) such that the discrete density cost function $C_d$ is defined by
\[
C_d(\{Q_i,P_i,U_i\}_{i=1}^s) := h \sum_{i=1}^s b_i C(Q_i,P_i,U_i) \approx \int_0^h C(q(t),p(t),u(t))\,\diff t.
\]
So as to prevent a proliferation of symbols and alleviate the notation, along a time step interval $[t_k,t_{k+1}]$, we write $q_h^k$, $p_h^k$ and $u_h^k$ instead of $\{q_k,\{Q_i^k\}_{i=1}^s,q_{k+1}\}$, $\{p_k,\{P_i^k\}_{i=1}^s,p_{k+1}\}$ and $\{U_i^k\}_{i=1}^s$, respectively. We drop the superscript $k$ if we consider an arbitrary time step interval $[0,h]$. With some abuse, along the whole interval $[0,T]$, we equally write $q_h$, $p_h$ and $u_h$ instead of $\{\{q_k,Q_i^k\}_{i=1,\dots,s}^{k=0,\dots,N-1},q_N\}$, $\{\{p_k,P_i^k\}_{i=1,\dots,s}^{k=0,\dots,N-1},p_N\}$ and $\{U_i^k\}_{i=1,\dots,s}^{k=0,\dots,N-1}$, respectively.
With this notation we define the discrete cost function $J_d$ as
\[
J_d(q_h, p_h,u_h) := \sum_{k=0}^{N-1} C_d(q_h^k,p_h^k,u_h^k) + \Phi(q_N,p_N)
\]
and introduce the following two discrete optimal control problems, where the discretization in Problem~\ref{prob:docp:spRK} is based on the spRK integrator and in Problem~\ref{prob:docp:sG} on the sG integrator.
\begin{problem}[Discrete optimal control problem: the spRK case] \label{prob:docp:spRK}
\begin{subequations}\label{eq:docp:spRK}
\begin{equation}\label{eq:docp:spRK:a}
\min_{q_h, p_h,u_h} J_d(q_h, p_h, u_h)
\end{equation}
subject to
\begin{align}
\label{eq:docp:spRK:b}
q_{k+1} =& q_k + h\sum_{j=1}^sb_j f(Q^k_j,P^k_j)\,, & p_{k+1} =& p_k + h\sum_{j=1}^s\bar b_jg(Q^k_j,P^k_j,U^k_j)\,,\\
\label{eq:docp:spRK:c}
Q^k_i =& q_k + h\sum_{j=1}^sa_{ij} f(Q^k_j,P^k_j)\,, & P^k_i =& p_k + h\sum_{j=1}^s\bar a_{ij}g(Q^k_j,P^k_j,U^k_j)\,
\end{align}
$k=0,\ldots,N-1,\, i=1,\ldots,s$, with $b_i\bar a_{ij}+\bar b_ja_{ji} = b_i\bar b_j$ and $b_i=\bar b_j$,
\begin{eqnarray}
\label{eq:docp:spRK:d}
(q_0,p_0) &=& (q^0,p^0), \quad U_i^k \in U.
\end{eqnarray}
\end{subequations}
\end{problem}
\begin{problem}[Discrete optimal control problem: the sG case]\label{prob:docp:sG}
\begin{subequations}\label{eq:docp:sG}
\begin{equation}\label{eq:docp:sG:a}
\min_{q_h, p_h, u_h} J_d(q_h, p_h, u_h)
\end{equation}
subject to
\begin{align}
\label{eq:docp:sG:b}
q_k =& \sum_{j=1}^s\alpha^jQ^k_j\,, & q_{k+1} =& \sum_{j=1}^s\beta^jQ^k_j\,,\\
\label{eq:docp:sG:c}
f(Q^k_i,P^k_i) =& \frac{1}{h}\sum_{j=1}^sa_{ij}Q^k_j\,, & g(Q^k_i,P^k_i,U^k_i) =& \frac{\beta^ip_{k+1}-\alpha^ip_k}{h\bar b_i} + \frac1h\sum_{j=1}^s\bar a_{ij}P^k_j\,,
\end{align}
$k=0,\ldots,N-1,\, i=1,\ldots,s$, with $b_ia_{ij}+\bar b_j\bar a_{ji}=0$ and $b_i=\bar b_j$,
\begin{eqnarray}
\label{eq:docp:sG:d}
(q_0,p_0) &=& (q^0,p^0), \quad U_i^k \in U.
\end{eqnarray}
\end{subequations}
\end{problem}
Since Problem~\ref{prob:docp:spRK} has been extensively studied in \cite{ObJuMa10} (as discussed in Section~\ref{subsec:comp}), in this work we focus on Problem~\ref{prob:docp:sG}.
\subsection{Comparison of different solution methods}\label{subsec:comp}
In Figure~\ref{fig:intro_comparison} (see also \cite{ObJuMa10}) we present schematically different discretization strategies for optimal control problems.
Starting with the Lagrangian optimal control problem~\ref{prob:locp}, we obtain via variation (for the derivation of the Euler-Lagrange equations) the optimal control problem~\ref{prob:ocp}. For its solution, direct or indirect methods can be employed (the differences of direct and indirect methods are already discussed in Section~\ref{sec:intro}).
In the DMOC approach, rather than discretizing the differential equations arising from the Lagrange-d'Alembert principle, we discretize in the earliest stage, namely already at the level of the variational principle. Then, we perform the variation only on the discrete level which results in a nonlinear programming problem (in particular we obtain the discrete Lagrangian optimal control problem~\ref{probd:locp}). Its necessary optimality conditions are derived by a dualization step as for a standard direct method.
This approach that uses the concept of discrete mechanics leads to a special discretization of the system equations based on variational integrators. Thus, the discrete optimal control problem inherits special properties exhibited by variational integrators as extensively discussed in \cite{ObJuMa10}.
\begin{figure}[h]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{methods-tree}
\caption[Diagram of OCP numerical methods]{\footnotesize Optimal control for mechanical systems: the order of variation, dualization and discretization for deriving the necessary optimality conditions.}\label{fig:intro_comparison}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
In this work we are interested in the question under which conditions the discretized necessary optimality conditions (discrete PMP) and the KKT conditions resulting from the discrete optimal control problems \eqref{prob:docp:spRK} and \eqref{prob:docp:sG} ($\widehat{\text{KKT}}$) are identical.
To this end, we summarize by now already known equivalence relations (A), (B) and (C) as indicated in Figure~\ref{fig:intro_comparison}.
\paragraph{Equivalence (A)}
This equivalence corresponds to the commutation of variation and discretization.
For particular variational integrators their equivalence to other well-known integration methods has been shown, \emph{e.g.}\ the equivalence to the St\"ormer-Verlet method (\cite{Ma92}), to the Newmark algorithm (\cite{Kane00}) or, more generally, to spRK methods (\cite{Su90, MaWe01, HaLuWa02}) applied to the corresponding Hamiltonian system. Whereas the variational derivation of spRK methods is an already known fact and was presented in Section~\ref{sec:sprk} from a slightly different point of view, we found in Section~\ref{sec:sg} a new class of integrators, the sG methods, that applied to the Hamiltonian systems are equivalent to variational integrators based on the discrete Lagrangian~\eqref{eq:twopointL_sG}.
Obviously, if the variation of the discrete Lagrange-d'Alembert principle (the variational integrator) and the discretization of the Euler-Lagrange or, equivalently, the Hamiltonian equations is the same, then, using the same discretization for the cost functional provides the same NLP in the middle and the right branch in Figure~\ref{fig:intro_comparison}.
\paragraph{Equivalence (B)}
Of course, if NLP and $\widehat{\text{NLP}}$ are identical (equivalence (A)), then also the KKT and the $\widehat{\text{KKT}}$ conditions are identical.
\paragraph{Equivalence (C)} This equivalence corresponds to the commutation of discretization and dualization.
As already summarized in Section~\ref{sec:intro}, for the class of Legendre pseudospectral methods the commutation property has been proved if additional closure conditions are satisfied (see \cite{GoRoKaFa08,RoFa03}). In \cite{ObJuMa10} the commutation of discretization and dualization is proved for spRK methods, that means, the dualization of Problem~\ref{prob:docp:spRK} is the same as the discretization of the necessary optimality conditions using a spRK method. Due to equivalence (A), this commutation property also holds for high order variational integrators based on the discrete Lagrangian~\eqref{eq:twopointL}.
However, for general classes of variational integrators (in particular there exist high order variational integrators that are not equivalent to RK methods, see \emph{e.g.}\ \cite{O14}), the commutation property is still an open question.
As new contribution in this paper, we show in Section~\ref{sec:conmutation} that discretization and dualization also commute for the sG integrator (see Theorem~\ref{th:commutation}) (\emph{i.e.}\ the dualization of Problem~\ref{prob:docp:sG} is the same as the discretization of the necessary optimality conditions using an sG method).
We therefore find (besides the spRK methods) another class of variational integrators that fulfills the commutation property.
\section{Analysis of convergence of the primal variables} \label{sec:conv}
In this section, we present one of the main results of the paper, that is the convergence of the primal variables. Before that, a couple of comments are necessary to clarify the assumptions and notation that appear in the statement. Examples will enlighten the result.
We say that a function $f\colon H\to\mathbb{R}$ is \emph{coercive}, where $H$ is a Hilbert space with norm $\|\cdot\|$ (in our case of study $H$ is either $\mathbb{R}^m$ or $L^2([0,T],\mathbb{R}^m)$), if there exists a scalar factor $\alpha>0$ for which
\[ \liminf_{\|x\|\to\infty}\frac{f(x)}{\|x\|^2}\geq\alpha \,. \]
If $f$ depends on a further variable, $f=f(x,y)$, we say that $f$ is \emph{uniformly coercive in $x$ (with respect to $y$)} if the coercivity factor $\alpha$ does not depend on $y$.
In the next result, a discrete trajectory $q_h$, either over a time step interval $[0,h]$ or over the whole time interval $[0,T]$, should be understood as a continuous trajectory along $[0,h]$ or $[0,T]$, respectively. To that, on $[0,h]$, $q_h=\{q_0,\{Q_i\}_{i=1}^s,q_1\}$ can be also viewed as its own linear interpolation, that is as the piecewise-linear continuous function $q_h\colon[0,h]\to\mathbb{R}^n$ determined by
\[ q_h(0)=q_0 \,,\ q_h(i\cdot h/(s+1))=Q_i\,,\ i=1,\ldots,s\,,\ q_h(h)=q_1 \]
and linear in between. One proceeds similarly on $[0,T]$ and as well for $p_h$ and $u_h$.
\begin{theorem} \label{thm:control:conv}
Given a Lagrangian function $L\colon TQ\to\mathbb{R}$, an external control force $F\colon TQ\times U\to T^*Q$, a density cost function $C\colon T^*Q\times U\to\mathbb{R}$ and a set of collocation points $0\leq c_1<\ldots<c_s\leq1$ defining a quadrature rule $(c_i,b_i)$, let us assume that
\begin{enumerate}
\renewcommand{\theenumi}{H\arabic{enumi}}
\item $L$ is regular; \label{thm:control:conv:regularity}
\item $F$ is affine on the controls, \emph{i.e.}\ $F(q,\dot{q},u)=F_0(q,\dot{q})+u\cdot F_1(q,\dot{q})$; \label{thm:control:conv:linearity}
\item $C$ is uniformly coercive in $u$ and smooth in $(q,p)$; \label{thm:control:conv:coercivity}
\item $(OCP)$, the continuous Problem \ref{prob:ocp}, has a unique solution $(\bar q,\bar p, \bar u)$;\label{thm:control:conv:uniqueness}
\item $b_i>0$ for $i=1,\ldots,s$; and \label{thm:control:conv:positiveness}
\item the associated spRK or sG scheme is convergent (for $L$, $F$ and any fixed $u$).\label{thm:control:conv:convergence}
\end{enumerate}
Then $(\bar q_h,\bar p_h, \bar u_h)$ converges (up to subsequence) to $(\bar q,\bar p, \bar u)$ as $h\to0$ ($N\to\infty$), strongly in $(q,p)$ and weakly in $u$, where $(\bar q_h,\bar p_h, \bar u_h)$ is the solution to $(OCP)_h$, the corresponding discrete Problem \ref{prob:docp:spRK} or \ref{prob:docp:sG}.
\end{theorem}
\begin{proof}
The assumption of coercivity \ref{thm:control:conv:coercivity} on the density cost function $C$ (recall $\Phi$ is assumed to be bounded from below) implies the coercivity of the total cost functional $J$ and, together with the assumption of positiveness \ref{thm:control:conv:positiveness} on the weight coefficients $b_i$, ensures also the coercivity of the discrete density cost $C_d$ and of the discrete total cost $J_d$: Indeed, from the definition and for $u_h$ big enough,
\[\frac{C_d(q_h,p_h,u_h;h)}{\|u_h\|^2} \geq h\min_ib_i\alpha \qquad\text{and}\qquad \frac{J_d(q_h,p_h,u_h;h)}{\|u_h\|^2} \geq T\min_ib_i\alpha \,, \]
where $(q_h,p_h,u_h)$ represents a one step trajectory on the left while a full trajectory on the right. The coercivity of $J$ follows similarly by integration. We stress the fact that $J_d$ is uniformly coercive with respect to the time step $h$.
Besides we have from \ref{thm:control:conv:regularity} that, for $h$ small enough, the discrete Lagrangian $L_d$ is regular. Therefore for each control set $u_h$, a unique solution $(q_h,p_h)$ to the discrete Euler-Lagrange equations exists. The minimization in $(OCP)_h$ is then nothing but a finite dimensional minimization problem whose solution existence is provided by the coercivity of $C_d$. We denote $(\bar q_h,\bar p_h, \bar u_h)$ such solution.
Since the discrete cost $J_d$ is uniformly coercive with respect to $h$, the sequence $(\bar u_h)$, thought in $L^2([0,T],U)$, is bounded. Hence, up to subsequence, it converges to some control $\tilde u\in L^2([0,T],U)$, for the weak topology of $L^2$. It only remains to show that $(\tilde q,\tilde p, \tilde u)$, where $(\tilde q,\tilde p)$ is the unique solution of the mechanical system corresponding to the control $\tilde u$ (hypothesis \ref{thm:control:conv:regularity}), is in fact the same point as $(\bar q,\bar p, \bar u)$.
Firstly, by \ref{thm:control:conv:linearity}, the controls enter the continuous and discrete dynamical equations \eqref{eq:LOCP_dA}, \eqref{eq:spRK_1}, \eqref{eq:spRK_2}, \eqref{eq:sG_1} and \eqref{eq:sG_2} linearly. It follows that $(\bar q_h,\bar p_h)$ converges uniformly to $(\tilde q,\tilde p)$ (more technical details on this standard reasoning may be found in \cite{Tr00}). Secondly, we observe that the control $\tilde u$ is optimal: Indeed, since the discrete cost $J_d$ is an approximation to the continuous one $J$, we have that for some exponent $r\geq1$
\begin{eqnarray*}
J(\bar q_h,\bar p_h,\bar u_h)
& = & J_d(\bar q_h,\bar p_h,\bar u_h;h) + O(h^r)\\
&\leq& J_d((\bar q,\bar p,\bar u)_h;h) + O(h^r)\\
& = & J(\bar q,\bar p,\bar u) + O(h^r) \,,
\end{eqnarray*}
where $(\bar q,\bar p,\bar u)_h$, for each $h$, represents simply the evaluation of $(\bar q,\bar p,\bar u)$ at the collocation points of each time interval. Passing to the limit, from the lower semi-continuity of $J$ with respect to $u$ (given by the integral expression and hypothesis \ref{thm:control:conv:coercivity}), it follows that
\[ J(\tilde q,\tilde p,\tilde u) \leq J(\bar q,\bar p,\bar u) \,. \]
Hence $(\tilde q,\tilde p,\tilde u)$ is optimal and by uniqueness coincides with $(\bar q,\bar p,\bar u)$.
\end{proof}
\begin{remark}\label{rem:coercivity}
Even though the rather ``classical'' definition of coercivity used here is perhaps less restrictive than the one given in \cite{Ha00,Ha01}, there is no direct relation between them in the sense that none of them implies or is implied by the other. They have non-empty intersection. In there, the coercivity is a classical sufficient second-order assumption ensuring the absence of conjugate points. In here, the coercivity implies the existence of a (global) optimal control. The framework that \ref{thm:control:conv} proposes has some advantages: It permits to prove without difficulty the existence of solutions for the discretized problem and it ensures the convergence from a simple topological argument. Moreover, the proof itself has the potential of being more general, for instance to consider final constraints (by means of finer arguments, the concept of end-point mapping, the general conjugate point theory).
\end{remark}
\begin{remark}\label{rem:nonlinearity}
It is worth to note that the previous proof withstands some easy generalizations. If we now take more general dynamics (nonlinear force in $u$) and costs, then the above reasoning works as well provided the cost is coercive in some $L^p$ and the dynamics satisfy, for instance,
\[ \limsup_{\|u\|\to\infty}\frac{\|\Psi(q,p,u)\|}{\|u\|^r} = 0 \,,\ p>r\,, \]
where $\Psi=0$ stands for the dynamical constraints \eqref{eq:LOCP_dA}.
\end{remark}
\begin{remark}\label{rem:convergence}
A convergence proof (including consistency and stability) for general variational integrators (as assumed in \ref{thm:control:conv:convergence}) is topic of ongoing research. For particular classes, the convergence is proven by showing that the variational integrator is equivalent to another well-known convergent method, as for example for symplectic partitioned Runge-Kutta methods. For a recent convergence analysis for Galerkin variational integrators by means of variational error analysis we refer to \cite{HaLe13}. The assumption \ref{thm:control:conv:uniqueness}, the uniqueness of the solution of $(OCP)$, is a classical one. It can be weakened by stating the result in terms of closure points as follows. We assume that $C^0([0,T],T^*Q)$ is endowed with the uniform convergence topology and that $L^2([0,T],U)$ is endowed with the weak topology. Then every closure point of the family of solutions $(\bar q_h,\bar p_h, \bar u_h)$ of $(OCP)_h$ in $C^0([0,T],T^*Q)\times L^2([0,T],U)$ is a solution of $(OCP)$.
\end{remark}
\begin{remark}\label{rem:discretization}
In the formulation of the previous discrete optimal control problems \ref{prob:docp:spRK} and \ref{prob:docp:sG}, we have chosen to discretize the control parameter and the cost functional in accordance to the dynamical discretization. Other possibilities are available which must be pondered. Let's assume temporarily that, besides the original set of collocation points $0\leq c_1<\ldots<c_s\leq1$, we have a couple of extra sets of them: $0\leq d_1<\ldots<d_r\leq1$ and $0\leq e_1<\ldots<e_t\leq1$, for which $\mathcal{U}$ is determined by the former and $J$ is discretized by the quadrature rule associated to the latter. That is, $\mathcal{U}\colon[0,h]\to\mathbb{R}$ is a polynomial of order $r-1$ determined by $r$ points $\bar U_i=\mathcal{U}(d_ih)$, $i=1,\ldots,r$, and for which $U_j:=\mathcal{U}(c_jh)$, $j=1,\ldots,s$, and $\hat U_k:=\mathcal{U}(e_kh)$, $k=1,\ldots,t$, are mere evaluations. And the cost function $J$ is discretized by the formula $h \sum_{k=0}^{N-1} \sum_{i=1}^t \hat b_i C(\hat Q^k_i,\hat P^k_i,\hat U^k_i)$, where with a similar notation the ``hat'' stands for weights and evaluations related to the $e$'s. Now, different cases arise:
\begin{itemize}
\item If $r>t$, one does an underevaluation of the controls within the discrete cost functional which will allow these to diverge (for instance a control could not appear explicitly in the discrete cost and therefore take any arbitrary value).
\item If on the contrary $r<t$, one does an overevaluation of the controls which, in the case of a coercive discrete cost function, will only increase the computational cost with, a priori, no convergence benefits.
\item Therefore, the case $r=t$ seems to be the best fit, which is the case where there is a minimal number of evaluations of the controls (each control is evaluated just once in the discrete cost) so to have convergence under the assumption of coercivity.
\end{itemize}
Assuming the last situation and continuing with the discussion, further cases arise:
\begin{itemize}
\item On the one hand, if $r>s$, the convergence rate of the controls will be limited by the accuracy of the discrete dynamics.
\item On the other hand, if $r<s$, the convergence rate of the controls will suffer from a computational payload by the high accuracy of the dynamics.
\item Therefore, the case $r=s$ seems again to be the best fit, which is the case that equates accuracy of the dynamics with convergence rate of the controls.
\end{itemize}
Finally, under the assumption $r=s=t$, choosing a unique set of collocation points $0\leq c_1<\ldots<c_s\leq1$ (we drop the ``hats'', ``bars'', $e$'s and $d$'s), one minimizes the number of polynomial evaluations and therefore the total computational cost (besides of simplifying the problem).
\end{remark}
In the following example, we solve a simple optimal control problem with a linear dynamical constraint and a quadratic cost function. The numerical experiments show, in the spirit of \cite{Ha00} and the previous discussion before it, how a good choice and proper combination of the discretization gives a ``fast'' convergence of the scheme, while other combinations show ``slow'' convergence or even divergence of the controls, all of it exemplifying Theorem \ref{thm:control:conv}.
\begin{example}
Consider the problem
\begin{subequations} \label{eq:ocp:hager}
\begin{align}
\label{eq:ocp:hager:cost}
& \min_{q,\dot{q},u}\int_0^T(\dot{q}^2+u^2) \,\diff t\\
\label{eq:ocp:hager:dyn}
& \textrm{s.t.}\quad\ddot q = 1+u\,,\quad(q(0),\dot{q}(0))=(0,0)
\end{align}
\end{subequations}
for which the functions
\[ q(t) = \frac{\cosh(t)-1}{\cosh(T)} \qquad\text{and}\qquad u(t) = \frac{\cosh(t)}{\cosh(T)}-1 \]
are the unique solution. We identify from the forced Euler-Lagrange equation \eqref{eq:ocp:hager:dyn} the Lagrangian function $L(q,\dot{q}) = \frac12\dot{q}^2+q$ and the control force $F(q,\dot{q},u) = u$. The density cost function is obviously $C(q,\dot{q},u) = \dot{q}^2+u^2$.
We discretize the mechanical system by using a symplectic Galerkin approach together with a Lobatto quadrature for $s=3$ points. We initially assume that the controls are also discretized by $r=3$ nodes. Then the right- hand side equations of \eqref{eq:sG_2} or \eqref{eq:docp:sG:c} are
\begin{subequations}
\label{eq:docp:hager}
\begin{eqnarray}
\dot{P}_1 = & \frac{-p_0}{h/6} + \frac1h(4\dot{Q}_1+2\dot{Q}_2) & = 1+U_1 \,,\\
\dot{P}_2 = & \phantom{\frac{-p_0}{h/6} +} \frac1h(-\dot{Q}_1+\dot{Q}_3) & = 1+U_2 \,,\\
\dot{P}_3 = & \frac{p_1}{h/6} + \frac1h(2\dot{Q}_2-4\dot{Q}_3) & = 1+U_3 \,,
\end{eqnarray}
\end{subequations}
where the micro-veloticies $\dot{Q}_i$ are given by the left equations of \eqref{eq:sG_2} or \eqref{eq:docp:sG:c}, which are in this particular case
\[
\left(\begin{array}{c}
\dot{Q}_1\\ \dot{Q}_2\\ \dot{Q}_3
\end{array}\right)
= \frac1h
\left(\begin{array}{rrr}
-3 & 4 & -1\\
-1 & 0 & 1\\
1 & -4 & 3
\end{array}\right)
\left(\begin{array}{c}
Q_1\\ Q_2\\ Q_3
\end{array}\right)
\]
For the cost function, we consider four different discretizations with Lobatto's quadrature rule for $t=1,2,3,4$ quadrature points. These are respectively
\begin{subequations} \label{eq:docp:hager:cntrl3}
\begin{eqnarray}
\label{eq:docp:hager:cntrl3:cost1}
C_d(q_h,p_h,u_h) &=& h\left(\dot{Q}_2^2+U_2^2\right) \,,\\
\label{eq:docp:hager:cntrl3:cost2}
C_d(q_h,p_h,u_h) &=& \frac{h}2\left(\dot{Q}_1^2+\dot{Q}_3^2+U_1^2+U_3^2\right) \,,\\
\label{eq:docp:hager:cntrl3:cost3}
C_d(q_h,p_h,u_h) &=& \frac{h}6\left(\dot{Q}_1^2+4\dot{Q}_2^2+\dot{Q}_3^2+U_1^2+4U_2^2+U_3^2\right) \,,\\
\label{eq:docp:hager:cntrl3:cost4}
C_d(q_h,p_h,u_h) &=& \frac{h}{12}\left((3-\sqrt5)\left(\dot{Q}_1^2+(3-\sqrt5)\dot{Q}_2^2+\dot{Q}_3^2+\right)\right.\\
& & \phantom{\frac{h}{12}\left(\right.}\left.+(1-1/\sqrt5)\left((\dot{Q}_1+\dot{Q}_2)^2+(\dot{Q}_2+\dot{Q}_3)^2\right)\right) \nonumber\\
& & + \frac{h}{30}\left(2(U_1+U_2)^2+(U_1-U_3)^2+2(U_2+U_3)^2\right. \nonumber\\
& & \phantom{+\frac{h}{30}\left(\right.}\left.+ U_1^2+12U_2^2+U_3^2\right) \,. \nonumber
\end{eqnarray}
\end{subequations}
The first two discretizations, Equations \eqref{eq:docp:hager:cntrl3:cost1} and \eqref{eq:docp:hager:cntrl3:cost2}, are clearly not coercive with respect to the controls ($U_1$ and $U_3$ are missing in \eqref{eq:docp:hager:cntrl3:cost1} and $U_2$ is missing in \eqref{eq:docp:hager:cntrl3:cost2}), which will be allowed to diverge (see Figures~\ref{fig:HagerD3U3J1} and \ref{fig:HagerD3U3J2}). Nonetheless the last two discretizations, Equations \eqref{eq:docp:hager:cntrl3:cost3} and \eqref{eq:docp:hager:cntrl3:cost4}, are indeed coercive, still one outperforms the other in terms of convergence (see Figures~\ref{fig:HagerD3U3J3} and \ref{fig:HagerD3U3J4}). The discrete cost function \eqref{eq:docp:hager:cntrl3:cost4}, besides of having a higher computational cost, shows a slower convergence rate. The discrete cost function \eqref{eq:docp:hager:cntrl3:cost3} corresponds to the method presented in Problem \eqref{eq:docp:sG} and Theorem \ref{thm:control:conv}.
\newcommand{\widetilde U}{\widetilde U}
We continue by assuming that the approximated control $\mathcal{U}$ is determined only by two points, that is
\[ \mathcal{U}(t) = \widetilde U_1 + t(\widetilde U_3-\widetilde U_1) \]
(we note $\widetilde U_3$ instead of $\widetilde U_2$ to make the notation more appealing). The previous set of Equations \eqref{eq:docp:hager} and \eqref{eq:docp:hager:cntrl3} are then updated by merely substituting the controls by
\[ U_1 = \widetilde U_1 \,,\ U_2 = \tfrac12(\widetilde U_1+\widetilde U_3) \,,\ \textrm{and}\ U_3 = \widetilde U_3 \,, \]
which leads to
\begin{subequations} \label{eq:docp:hager:cntrl2}
\begin{eqnarray}
\label{eq:docp:hager:cntrl2:cost1}
C_d(q_h,p_h,u_h) &=& h\left(\dot{Q}_2^2+(\widetilde U_1+\widetilde U_3)^2/4\right) \,, \\
\label{eq:docp:hager:cntrl2:cost2}
C_d(q_h,p_h,u_h) &=& \frac{h}2\left(\dot{Q}_1^2+\dot{Q}_3^2+\widetilde U_1^2+\widetilde U_3^2\right) \,, \\
\label{eq:docp:hager:cntrl2:cost3}
C_d(q_h,p_h,u_h) &=& \frac{h}6\left(\dot{Q}_1^2+4\dot{Q}_2^2+\dot{Q}_3^2+\widetilde U_1^2+(\widetilde U_1+\widetilde U_3)^2+\widetilde U_3^2\right) \,, \\
\label{eq:docp:hager:cntrl2:cost4}
C_d(q_h,p_h,u_h) &=& \frac{h}{12}\left((3-\sqrt5)\left(\dot{Q}_1^2+(3-\sqrt5)\dot{Q}_2^2+\dot{Q}_3^2+\right)\right.\\
& & \phantom{\frac{h}{12}\left(\right.}\left.+(1-1/\sqrt5)\left((\dot{Q}_1+\dot{Q}_2)^2+(\dot{Q}_2+\dot{Q}_3)^2\right)\right) \nonumber\\
& & + \frac{h}{6}\left(\widetilde U_1^2+(\widetilde U_1+\widetilde U_3)^2+\widetilde U_3^2\right) \,. \nonumber
\end{eqnarray}
\end{subequations}
In this occasion, only the first discretization, Equation \eqref{eq:docp:hager:cntrl2:cost1}, defines a non-coercive discrete cost function (see Figure~\ref{fig:HagerD3U2J1}). From the rest (see Figures~\ref{fig:HagerD3U2J2}-\ref{fig:HagerD3U2J4}), Equations \eqref{eq:docp:hager:cntrl2:cost3} and \eqref{eq:docp:hager:cntrl2:cost4} show the fastest convergence rate, although slow on the controls and with a computational payload for \eqref{eq:docp:hager:cntrl2:cost4}. Equation \eqref{eq:docp:hager:cntrl2:cost3} corresponds to a discretization of the cost with three quadrature points.
\begin{figure}
\centering
\begin{subfigure}[b]{0.4\textwidth}
\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{figHagerD3U3J1}
\caption{cost function \eqref{eq:docp:hager:cntrl3:cost1}}
\label{fig:HagerD3U3J1}
\end{subfigure}
\hfill
\begin{subfigure}[b]{0.4\textwidth}
\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{figHagerD3U3J2}
\caption{cost function \eqref{eq:docp:hager:cntrl3:cost2}}
\label{fig:HagerD3U3J2}
\end{subfigure}
\\
\begin{subfigure}[b]{0.4\textwidth}
\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{figHagerD3U3J3}
\caption{cost function \eqref{eq:docp:hager:cntrl3:cost3}}
\label{fig:HagerD3U3J3}
\end{subfigure}
\hfill
\begin{subfigure}[b]{0.4\textwidth}
\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{figHagerD3U3J4}
\caption{cost function \eqref{eq:docp:hager:cntrl3:cost4}}
\label{fig:HagerD3U3J4}
\end{subfigure}
\caption{Convergence behavior of the discrete solution for the discrete cost functions given in \eqref{eq:docp:hager:cntrl3}.}
\label{fig:HagerD3U3}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure}
\centering
\begin{subfigure}[b]{0.4\textwidth}
\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{figHagerD3U2J1}
\caption{cost function \eqref{eq:docp:hager:cntrl2:cost1}}
\label{fig:HagerD3U2J1}
\end{subfigure}
\hfill
\begin{subfigure}[b]{0.4\textwidth}
\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{figHagerD3U2J2}
\caption{cost function \eqref{eq:docp:hager:cntrl2:cost2}}
\label{fig:HagerD3U2J2}
\end{subfigure}
\\
\begin{subfigure}[b]{0.4\textwidth}
\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{figHagerD3U2J3}
\caption{cost function \eqref{eq:docp:hager:cntrl2:cost3}}
\label{fig:HagerD3U2J3}
\end{subfigure}
\hfill
\begin{subfigure}[b]{0.4\textwidth}
\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{figHagerD3U2J4}
\caption{cost function \eqref{eq:docp:hager:cntrl2:cost4}}
\label{fig:HagerD3U2J4}
\end{subfigure}
\caption{Convergence behavior of the discrete solution for the discrete cost functions given in \eqref{eq:docp:hager:cntrl2}.}
\label{fig:HagerD3U2}
\end{figure}
\end{example}
\section{Commutation of discretization and dualization} \label{sec:conmutation}
In this section we investigate the equivalence (C) in Figure~\ref{fig:intro_comparison} for the special choice of sG discretization of the optimal control problem~\ref{prob:ocp}. To this end, we analyze and compare the adjoint systems for the continuous and the discrete optimal control problems.
Throughout the section we assume that all controls under consideration do not saturate the constraints. In other words, we assume that the optimal control is in the interior of the set of constraints on controls. This is obviously the case if $U=\mathbb{R}^m$. This assumption allows us to avoid the typical situation of bang-bang controls, and under slight extra conditions, to derive (from the Pontryagin Maximum Principle) extremal controls that are smooth functions of the state and costate. The necessary optimality conditions \eqref{eq:minprinc} are
\begin{subequations} \label{eq:general:ocp}
\begin{align}
\label{eq:general:ocp_1}
\dot\lambda &= -\nabla_qC-\lambda\cdot\nabla_qf-\psi\cdot\nabla_qg\,, &\lambda(T)&=\nabla_q\Phi(q(T),p(T))\,,\\
\label{eq:general:ocp_2}
\dot\psi &= -\nabla_pC-\lambda\cdot\nabla_pf-\psi\cdot\nabla_pg\,, &\psi(T) &= \nabla_q\Phi(q(T),p(T))\,,\\
\label{eq:general:ocp_3}
0 &= \nabla_uC + \psi\cdot\nabla_ug\,.
\end{align}
\end{subequations}
If we use the sG integrator for the discretization of Problem~\ref{prob:ocp}, we obtain the discretized optimal control problem~\ref{prob:docp:sG}. To derive the necessary optimality conditions for the discretized optimal control problem, we introduce the discrete adjoint vectors (covectors in $\mathbb{R}^n$) $\lambda_0,\ldots,\lambda_N$, $\mu_0,\ldots,\mu_{N-1}$, $\psi_0$, $\Lambda_i^0,\ldots,\Lambda_i^{N-1}$, $\Psi_i^0,\ldots,\Psi_i^{N-1}$, $i=1,\ldots,s$, and define the discrete optimal control Lagrangian as
\begin{align}
\mathcal{L}_d =\,& \sum_{k=0}^{N-1} \sum_{i=1}^s h b_i C_i^k + \Phi(q_N,p_N) - \lambda_0\cdot (q_0-q^0) - \psi_0\cdot (p_0-p^0) \nonumber\\
& + \sum_{k=0}^{N-1} \left[ \mu_k\cdot \left(q_k - \sum_{j=1}^s\alpha^jQ_j^k\right) - \lambda_{k+1}\cdot \left(q_{k+1} - \sum_{j=1}^s\beta^jQ_j^k\right)\right. \nonumber\\
& + \sum_{i=1}^s \Lambda_i^k\cdot \left( h f_i^k - \sum_{j=1}^s a_{ij}Q_j^k\right) \nonumber\\
& + \left. \Psi_i^k\cdot \left( h g_i^k - \frac{\beta^ip_{k+1}-\alpha^ip_k}{\bar b_i} - \sum_{j=1}^s\bar a_{ij}P_j^k \right)\right], \label{eq:ocpLd}
\end{align}
where $C_i^k$ is a short notation for $C(Q_i^k,P_i^k,U_i^k)$ (analogously for $f_i^k$ and $g_i^k$).
The necessary optimality conditions (KKT equations) are derived by differentiation w.r.t.~the discrete variables $q_k,p_k$, $k=0,\ldots,N$ and $Q_i^k, P_i^k, U_i^k$, $k=0,\ldots,N-1$, $i=1,\ldots,s$,
which leads to
\begin{subequations}\label{eq:sG_adjoint_or}
\begin{align}
\text{for}\; k=0,\ldots,N-1:\qquad \mu_k -\lambda_k &=0,\label{eq:mulambda}\\
\nabla_q\Phi(q_N,p_N) - \lambda_N &=0, \label{eq:sG_adjoint_or_2}\\
-\psi_0 + \sum_{i=1}^s \frac{\alpha^i}{\bar{b}_i}\Psi_i^0&=0, \label{eq:sG_adjoint_or_3}\\
\text{for}\; k=1,\ldots,N-1:\qquad \sum_{i=1}^s \frac{\alpha_i}{\bar b_i}\Psi_i^k - \sum_{i=1}^s \frac{\beta^i}{\bar b_i}\Psi_i^{k-1} &=0, \label{eq:sG_adjoint_or_4}\\
\nabla_p\Phi(q_N,p_N)- \sum_{i=1}^s \frac{\beta^i}{\bar{b}_i}\Psi_i^{N-1} &=0, \label{eq:sG_adjoint_or_5}\\
\frac1h\bigg(-\alpha^i\mu_k + \beta^i\lambda_{k+1} - \sum_{j=1}^sa_{ji}\Lambda_j^k\bigg) + b_i\nabla_qC_i^k + \Lambda_i^k\cdot\nabla_qf_i^k + \Psi_i^k\cdot\nabla_qg_i^k&=0, \label{eq:sG_adjoint_or_6}\\
-\frac1h\sum_{j=1}^s\bar{a}_{ji}\Psi_j^k + b_i\nabla_pC_i^k + \Lambda_i^k\cdot\nabla_pf_i^k + \Psi_i^k\cdot\nabla_pg_i^k &=0, \label{eq:sG_adjoint_or_7}\\
b_i\nabla_uC_i^k + \Psi_i^k\cdot\nabla_ug_i^k &= 0, \label{eq:sG_adjoint_or_8}
\end{align}
with $k=0,\ldots,N-1, i=1,\ldots,s$, for the last three equations.
\end{subequations}
\begin{subequations}
We transform the necessary optimality conditions by defining
\begin{gather}
\label{eq:defgammchi}
\Gamma_i^k := \Lambda_i^k/\bar{b}_i \quad\text{and}\quad \chi_i^k := \Psi_i^k/\bar{b}_i \quad\text{for}\quad k=0,\ldots,N-1,\, i=1,\ldots,s,\\
\label{eq:psi+-}
\psi_k^- := \sum_{i=1}^s\alpha^i\chi_i^k,\, k=0,\ldots,N-1,\quad\text{and}\quad \psi_k^+ := \sum_{i=1}^s\beta^i\chi_i^{k-1} ,\, k=1,\ldots,N,
\end{gather}
such that Equation~\eqref{eq:sG_adjoint_or_4} reduces to $\psi_k^- = \psi_k^+ :=\psi_k$.
\end{subequations}
By eliminating the variables $\mu_0,\ldots,\mu_{N-1}$ with Equation~\eqref{eq:mulambda} and by exploiting the conditions on the coefficients $b_ia_{ij}+\bar b_j\bar a_{ji}=0$ and $b_i = \bar{b}_i$, we obtain the following discrete adjoint system
\begin{subequations} \label{eq:sG_adjointgeneral}
\begin{align}
\label{eq:sG_adjointgeneral_1}
\psi_k =& \sum_{j=1}^s\alpha^j\chi_j^k\,,\\
\label{eq:sG_adjointgeneral_2}
\psi_{k+1} =& \sum_{j=1}^s\beta^j\chi_j^k\,,\\
\label{eq:sG_adjointgeneral_3}
-\nabla_qC_i^k-\Gamma_i^k\cdot\nabla_qf_i^k-\chi_i^k\cdot\nabla_qg_i^k =& \frac{\beta^i\lambda_{k+1}-\alpha^i\lambda_k}{h\bar b_i} + \frac1h\sum_{j=1}^s\bar a_{ij}\Gamma_j^k\,,\\
\label{eq:sG_adjointgeneral_4}
-\nabla_pC_i^k-\Gamma_i^k\cdot\nabla_pf-\chi_i^k\cdot\nabla_pg_i^k =& \frac1h\sum_{j=1}^sa_{ij}\chi_j^k\,,\\
\label{eq:sG_adjointgeneral_5}
\nabla_uC_i^k+\chi_i^k\cdot\nabla_ug_i^k =& 0\,,
\end{align}
\text{for $k=0,\ldots,N-1,\, i=1,\ldots,s$, and with final conditions}
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:sG_adjointgeneral_6}
\lambda_N = \nabla_q\Phi(q_N,p_N) \quad\text{and}\quad \psi_N= \nabla_p\Phi(q_N,p_N)\,,
\end{equation}
where
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:coeffab}
b_ia_{ij}+\bar b_j\bar a_{ji}=0 \quad\text{and}\quad b_i=\bar b_j\,.
\end{equation}
\end{subequations}
Note that the adjoint scheme~\eqref{eq:sG_adjointgeneral_1}-\eqref{eq:sG_adjointgeneral_4} together with the final constraints~\eqref{eq:sG_adjointgeneral_6} and the conditions on the coefficients \eqref{eq:coeffab} is exactly the symplectic Galerkin integrator applied to the adjoint system~\eqref{eq:general:ocp_1}-\eqref{eq:general:ocp_2}. To ensure that the discrete adjoint system~\eqref{eq:sG_adjointgeneral} is indeed equivalent to the necessary optimality conditions defined in \eqref{eq:sG_adjoint_or} we show the following proposition.
\begin{proposition}
\newcommand{\allowbreak}{\allowbreak}
If $\bar{b}_i>0$ for each $i$, then the necessary optimality conditions~\eqref{eq:sG_adjoint_or} and the discrete adjoint system~\eqref{eq:sG_adjointgeneral} are equivalent.
That is, if $(\mu_0,\ldots,\mu_{N-1},\allowbreak\Lambda_i^0,\ldots,\Lambda_i^{N-1},\allowbreak\Psi_i^0,\ldots,\Psi_i^{N-1})$, $i=1,\ldots,s$, satisfy \eqref{eq:sG_adjoint_or}, then \eqref{eq:sG_adjointgeneral} hold for $(\psi_k,\Gamma_i^k,\allowbreak\chi_i^k)$ defined in \eqref{eq:defgammchi} and \eqref{eq:psi+-}. Conversely, if $(\psi_1,\ldots,\psi_N,\allowbreak\Gamma_i^0,\ldots,\Gamma_i^{N-1},\allowbreak\chi_i^0,\ldots,\allowbreak\chi_i^{N-1})$, $i=1,\ldots,s$, satisfy \eqref{eq:sG_adjointgeneral}, then \eqref{eq:sG_adjoint_or} hold for $(\mu_k,\Lambda_i^k,\Psi_i^k)$ defined in \eqref{eq:mulambda} and \eqref{eq:defgammchi}.
\end{proposition}
\begin{proof}
\newcommand{\allowbreak}{\allowbreak}
We already derived the adjoint system~\eqref{eq:sG_adjointgeneral} starting from the necessary optimality conditions~\eqref{eq:sG_adjoint_or}. We now suppose that $(\psi_1,\ldots,\psi_N,\allowbreak\Gamma_i^0,\ldots,\Gamma_i^{N-1},\allowbreak\chi_i^0,\ldots,\allowbreak\chi_i^{N-1})$, $i = 1,\ldots,s$, satisfy the adjoint system~\eqref{eq:sG_adjointgeneral}. Equation~\eqref{eq:mulambda} holds by assumption. The condition for $\lambda_N$ in \eqref{eq:sG_adjointgeneral_6} and \eqref{eq:sG_adjoint_or_2} are identical. The condition for $\psi_N$ in \eqref{eq:sG_adjointgeneral_6} together with Equation~\eqref{eq:sG_adjointgeneral_2} for $k=N-1$ and the definition~\eqref{eq:defgammchi} yields \eqref{eq:sG_adjoint_or_5} whereas Equation~\eqref{eq:sG_adjointgeneral_1} for $k=0$ together with definition~\eqref{eq:defgammchi} yields \eqref{eq:sG_adjoint_or_3}. By subtracting Equations~\eqref{eq:sG_adjointgeneral_1} and \eqref{eq:sG_adjointgeneral_2} for the same index $k$ and using definition~\eqref{eq:defgammchi} we obtain \eqref{eq:sG_adjoint_or_4}. Finally, by taking the condition~\eqref{eq:coeffab} on the coefficients into account, \eqref{eq:sG_adjointgeneral_3}-\eqref{eq:sG_adjointgeneral_5} and definition \eqref{eq:defgammchi} yield \eqref{eq:sG_adjoint_or_6}-\eqref{eq:sG_adjoint_or_8}, respectively.
\end{proof}
With the classical Legendre assumption, \emph{i.e.}\ $(\pp*[^2\mathcal{H}]{u^2})(q^*,p^*,u^*,\lambda,\psi,1)$ is a positive definite symmetric matrix, with Equation~\eqref{eq:general:ocp_3} $u$ can be expressed as function of the states and the adjoints, $u=u(q,p,\lambda,\psi)$. We denote by $\nu$ and $\eta$ the functions defined by
\begin{align*}
\nu(q,p,\lambda,\psi) &= \left(-\nabla_qC(q,p,u)-\lambda\cdot\nabla_qf(q,p)-\psi\cdot\nabla_qg(q,p,u)\right)|_{u=u(q,p,\lambda,\psi)}\,,\\
\eta(q,p,\lambda,\psi) &= \left(-\nabla_pC(q,p,u)-\lambda\cdot\nabla_pf(q,p)-\psi\cdot\nabla_pg(q,p,u)\right)|_{u=u(q,p,\lambda,\psi)}\,.
\end{align*}
With some abuse of notation, let $g(q,p,\lambda,\psi)$ denote the function $g(q,p,u(q,p,\lambda,\psi))$.
In the case where the control has the form $U_i^k = u(Q_i^k,P_i^k,\Gamma_i^k,\chi_i^k)$, the state and adjoint scheme based on the symplectic Galerkin integrator can be expressed as
\begin{subequations}\label{eq:state_adjoint_discrete}
\begin{align}
q_k &= \sum_{j=1}^s\alpha^jQ^k_j\,,\quad q_{k+1} = \sum_{j=1}^s\beta^jQ^k_j\,, \quad \psi_k = \sum_{j=1}^s\alpha^j\chi_j^k\,,\quad \psi_{k+1} = \sum_{j=1}^s\beta^j\chi_j^k\,,\\
f^k_i &= \frac{1}{h}\sum_{j=1}^sa_{ij}Q^k_j\,,\quad g^k_i = \frac{\beta^ip_{k+1}-\alpha^ip_k}{h\bar b_i} + \frac1h\sum_{j=1}^s\bar a_{ij}P^k_j\,,\\
\eta^k_i &= \frac{1}{h}\sum_{j=1}^sa_{ij}\chi_j^k\,, \quad \nu^k_i = \frac{\beta^i \lambda_{k+1}-\alpha^i \lambda_k}{h\bar b_i} + \frac1h\sum_{j=1}^s\bar a_{ij}\Gamma_j^k\,,
\end{align}
$k=0,\ldots,N-1,\, i=1,\ldots,s$,
\begin{equation}
q_0=q^0,\quad p_0 = p^0,\quad \lambda_N = \nabla_q\Phi(q_N,p_N), \quad \psi_N= \nabla_p\Phi(q_N,p_N),
\end{equation}
\end{subequations}
where $b_ia_{ij}+\bar b_j\bar a_{ji}=0$ and $b_i=\bar b_j$ and where $f_i^k$ and $g^k_i$ are short notations for $f(Q_i^k,P_i^k)$ and $g(Q^k_i,P^k_i,\Gamma_i^k,\chi_i^k)$ (analogously for $\eta_i^k$ and $\nu^k_i$).
Scheme~\eqref{eq:state_adjoint_discrete} can be viewed as symplectic Galerkin discretization of the two-point boundary value problem
\begin{subequations}\label{eq:state_adjoint}
\begin{align}
\dot{q} &= f(q,p) \,,& q(0) &= q^0 \,, \\
\dot p &= g(q,p,\lambda,\psi) \,,& p(0) &= p^0 \,,\\
\dot\lambda &= \nu(q,p,\lambda,\psi) \,,& \lambda(T) &= \nabla_q\Phi(q(T),p(T)) \,,\\
\dot\psi &= \eta(q,p,\lambda,\psi) \,,& \psi(T) &= \nabla_q\Phi(q(T),p(T)) \,,
\end{align}
\end{subequations}
where the variables $(q,\psi)$ and $(p,\lambda)$ are treated in the same way, respectively. Since the same discrete scheme is used for state and adjoint system, the orders of approximation coincide. This leads to the following statement.
\begin{theorem}[Commutation property]\label{th:commutation}
Given the $(OCP)$ \ref{prob:ocp}, besides of \ref{thm:control:conv:regularity}, \ref{thm:control:conv:coercivity}, \ref{thm:control:conv:uniqueness} from Theorem~\ref{thm:control:conv}, we assume that $(\pp*[^2\mathcal{H}]{u^2})(q^*,p^*,u^*,\lambda,\psi,1)$ is a positive definite symmetric matrix. If a convergent symplectic Galerkin method with $b_i>0,\, i=1,\ldots,s,$ is used for the discretization of the state system, dualization and discretization commute, \emph{i.e.}\ the dualization of Problem~\ref{prob:docp:sG} coincides with the sG discretization of the boundary value problem~\eqref{eq:state_adjoint}.
\end{theorem}
\begin{remark}
In spirit of the Covector Mapping Principle (see \cite{GoRoKaFa08}), the order-preserving map between the adjoint variables corresponding to the dualized discrete problem (KKT) and the discretized dual problem (discrete PMP) is given by Equation~\eqref{eq:defgammchi}.
\end{remark}
\begin{remark}
If the controls do not saturate the constraints, \emph{i.e.}\ control constraints are active, the optimal solution is
typically only Lipschitz continuous. Then we expect
analogously to \cite{DoHa00} that convergence rates are limited to order two even for higher
order approximation schemes.
\end{remark}
\section{Conclusions}\label{sec:conclusion}
In this work, we investigate the application of high order variational integrators to the numerical solution of optimal control problems of mechanical systems. We derive two different schemes of high order variational integrators, the spRK and the sG method, which are both used for the discretization of a Lagrangian optimal control problem. The convergence of the primal variables of the resulting discrete optimal control problems is proven. Furthermore, the commutation of dualization and discretization for the sG method is shown, which extends the result in \cite{ObJuMa10} to another class of variational integrators that fulfills this commutation property and directly implies that the Covector Mapping Principle is satisfied. In particular, due to the commutation, not only the order of the adjoint scheme but also the discretization method itself is preserved and in contrast to Legendre pseudospectral methods or classical Runge-Kutta methods, no additional closure conditions (see \cite{GoRoKaFa08}) or conditions on the Runge Kutta coefficients (see \cite{Ha00}), respectively, are required.
The fulfillment of the Covector Mapping Principle provides a convenient way to prove the convergence of the dual variables (as done, for example, in \cite{Ha00}). With Theorem~\ref{th:commutation} the solution of the discretized direct problem coincides with the discrete solution of a shooting method applied to the necessary conditions of optimality. By showing the convergence of the shooting approach, we can conclude directly the convergence of the direct approach. The convergence proof for the adjoint variables is left for future work.
In the present paper we restricted ourselves to optimal control problems without any constraint on the final state. If we consider more general optimal control problems, involving constraints on the final state, then we expect that we will have to use the general conjugate point theory (see \cite{BoCaTr07}), in order to provide second-order conditions for optimality, related with the classical sensitivity analysis along a given optimal trajectory. Also, if there are some constraints on the final point then abnormal extremals may occur in the application of the Pontryagin Maximum Principle, which may raise a major problem in the analysis. Fortunately, it is known that abnormal minimizers do not exist under generic assumptions on the system and on the cost (see \cite{ChJeTr08}), and we expect that the results presented in this paper may hold in such a generic context. Otherwise the possible presence of abnormal minimizers is responsible for a loss of compactness (in particular, adjoint vectors do not stay in a compact anymore, see \cite{Tr00}), which may imply the failure of our method of proof, and it is not very clear then if we can expect that the Covector Mapping Principle hold true in that case.
These general considerations will be investigated in future work.
We stress again that, in the present paper, we have restricted ourselves to a more simple and tractable case. Once again, note that we have considered control-affine systems with (quasi)-quadratic costs, with assumptions ensuring the smoothness of optimal controls (as functions of the state and of the costate). As in \cite{Ha00}, our theory can be applied whenever there exist control constraints, provided the optimal controls under consideration belong to the interior of the set of constraints. Otherwise, in the general case controls may saturate the constraints, typically bang-bang controls do appear and then additional assumptions must be done in order to ensure a nice regularity of controls as functions of the state and of the costate. For instance, it is desirable to avoid chattering phenomena, in which a given optimal bang-bang control can have an infinite number of commutations over a compact interval. Also, we expect that one has to use the corresponding conjugate point theory in the bang-bang case. Such a theory does exist in the purely bang-bang case (see \cite{AgStZe98,MaOs04}) but then requires additional assumptions (ruling out, in particular, chattering). It can be noted that a general conjugate point theory, involving all possible subarcs -- free, bang, singular, boundary -- is still to be done. In order to get a general Covector Mapping Principle, such a complete theory is certainly required.
Another interesting issue is the application of more general symplectic and structure preserving methods in optimal control. Whereas the commutation property is shown for an already rich class of symplectic integrators (spRK and sG) it is still an open question, if it is satisfied for any variational and thus, any symplectic integrator (note that the classes of variational and symplectic integrators are identical, see \emph{e.g.}\ \cite{HaLuWa02}).
\section*{Acknowledgments}
This work has been partially supported by the European Union under the 7th Framework Programme FP7--PEOPLE--2010--ITN, grant agreement number 264735--SADCO, the Spanish MINECO under the National Reasearch Programme I+D+i 2010--2013, grant agreement number MTM2010-21186-C02-01. One of the authors, C.M.C., thanks the Universidad de Valladolid for its current postdoc position cofunded by the European Social Fund and the Junta de Castilla y León.
\bibliographystyle{siam}
|
\section{INTRODUCTION}
Young open clusters are useful objects to study the star formation process because about 80 percent of the
stars in star forming regions (SFRs) are found in clusters with at least 100 members \citep{LL03,
PCA03}. The relation between star formation activity and environmental conditions is one of the most interesting
issues in star formation studies \citep{CMP08,CMP12}. A basic diagnostic tool for understanding
star formation processes is the stellar initial mass function (IMF). The concept was first introduced by \citet{Sp55}.
If the stellar IMF has a universal shape in all SFRs, there must be a fundamental
factor controlling the star formation process. A number of efforts have been devoted to confirming the universality
(see review of \citealt{BCM10}), however, there is as yet no firm conclusion concerning the universality or diversity of
the shape. In this context, the IMF of young open clusters formed in various star-forming environments may
give a clue to the dependence of star formation processes on environmental conditions. As
part of an attempt to study this issue, we investigated the young open clusters NGC 1624 and NGC 1931
in the outer Galaxy, which is probably a low-metallicity environment, according to the gradient of metal
abundance in the Galactic disk \citep{YCF12}.
The young open cluster NGC 1624 is surrounded by the H {\scriptsize \textsc{II}} region Sh2-212
with a shell like structure. The cluster comprises several high-mass main sequence (MS) stars, as well as
a large number of pre-main sequence (PMS) stars \citep{JPO11}. The most luminous star is NGC 1624-2
(O7f?p -- \citealt{WSA10,SAW11}) located near the cluster center. This star with strong X-ray emission is known
to be a slowly rotating star with a very strong magnetic field \citep{WAM12}. Out of all the probable PMS
members one-fifth have circumstellar disks \citep{JPO11}. From their radio observations, \citet{DLK08} found
an ultra-compact H {\scriptsize \textsc{II}} (UCHII) region at the border of Sh2-212. A high-mass
PMS star (No. 228 of \citealt{DLK08}) seems to be associated with the UCHII. A few photometric studies of NGC 1624
provided the fundamental parameters \citep{MFJ79,CW84,SuBa06,DLK08,JPO11}. The reddening of
the cluster is about $E(B-V) = 0.7$ -- 0.9 mag. The previously determined distance to the
cluster was in the range 6.0 -- 6.5 kpc \citep{MFJ79,SuBa06,DLK08,JPO11}, while \citet{CW84} obtained a
far different value of 10.3 kpc. The IMF of the cluster was investigated by \citet{SuBa06}
and \citet{JPO11}, and its slope was reasonably consistent with the Salpeter/Kroupa IMF
\citep{Sp55,K01,K02}. It implies that although NGC 1624 is located in the outer Galaxy,
the nature of the star formation activity is similar to that found in the solar neighbourhood.
The nearer and younger open cluster NGC 1931 is associated with the glowing nebula Sh2-237. A few bright
MS stars and many PMS stars constitute the cluster \citep{PES13}. The main ionizing source of the
bright nebula is thought to be the B0.5 star \citep{GDK75} or two B2 stars \citep{PES13}. A number of PMS star
candidates were identified by \citet{PES13} from the Two Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS; \citealt{2mass})
catalog and {\it Spitzer} InfraRed Array Camera (IRAC) photometry. The spatial
distribution of members seems to be divided into two stellar groups, a northern and a southern group
\citep{BB09,PES13}. The fundamental parameters of the cluster were obtained from photometric
studies \citep{MFJ79,PM86,BPMP94,BB09,PES13}. According to these studies, the reddening and distance
of the cluster are $E(B-V) = 0.5$ -- 1.0 mag and $d = 1.8$ -- 2.4 kpc, respectively. A recent
study \citep{PES13} investigated the properties of dust toward the cluster using
polarimetric and photometric data. The reddening law toward the cluster estimated from
the Serkowski law \citep{SMF75} and color excess ratios indicated that the size distribution of dust grains
may be different from that of the general diffuse interstellar medium (ISM). They also derived the IMF of the northern, southern, and
the entire cluster regions, respectively. The slope of the IMF appears to be shallower than the
Salpeter/Kroupa IMF.
The present work on NGC 1624 and NGC 1931 is the fifth paper of the Sejong Open cluster Survey (SOS)
project which was initiated to provide homogeneous photometric data for many open clusters.
The overview of the SOS project can be found in \citet{SLB13} (hereafter
Paper 0). Comprehensive studies of several open clusters NGC 2353, IC 1848, and NGC 1893
were published as part of the project \citep{LSKI11, LSKBK14,LSKBP14}. In this work,
we revisit the reddening law as well as the fundamental parameters of these clusters in
a homogeneous manner. The IMF of the clusters is also studied in order to investigate the property of
star formation activity in the outer Galaxy. The observation and reliability of our photometry
are described in Section 2. In Section 3, we present several fundamental parameters of
the clusters obtained from photometric diagrams. The reddening law toward two clusters is
also discussed in this section. We construct the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram (HRD) in Section 4
and derive the IMF of the clusters in Section 5. Several discussions on the age spread of PMS stars
are made in Section 6. Finally, the comprehensive results from this study are summarized
in Section 7.
\section{OBSERVATION}
\subsection{AZT-22 1.5m Telescope of Maidanak Astronomical Observatory}
The observations of NGC 1624 was made on 2006 November 24, using the
AZT-22 1.5m telescope (f/7.74) at Maidanak Astronomical Observatory (MAO) in Uzbekistan.
All imaging data were acquired using Fairchild 486 CCD camera (SNUCam; \citealt{IKC10}) with the
standard Bessell $UBVI$ filters \citep{B90}. The field of view (FOV) is about $18\farcm1 \times 18\farcm1$. The characteristics of the
CCD chip have been described by \citet{LSKI08} in detail. The observations comprised
8 frames that were taken in two sets of exposure times for each band
-- 3 and 60s in $I$, 3 and 180s in $V$, 5 and 300s in $B$, and 15 and 600s in $U$. To transform
instrumental magnitudes to standard magnitudes and colors we made observations of several
equatorial standard stars \citep{MMLCE91} over a wide air mass range of $X \sim$ 1.2 -- 2.0 on
the same night. The observations are summarized in Table~\ref{tab1}, and the left-hand panel
in Figure~\ref{fig1} displays the finder chart (dashed line) for the observed stars brighter than $V = 18$ mag.
All pre-processing to remove instrumental artifacts was carried out using the \textsc{IRAF}\footnote{Image
Reduction and Analysis Facility is developed and distributed by the National Optical Astronomy
Observatories, which is operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy under
operative agreement with the National Science Foundation.}/\textsc{CCDRED} packages as described in
\citet{LSKI08}. Simple aperture photometry was performed for the standard stars with an aperture
size of 14.0 arcsec (26.3 pixels). Atmospheric extinction coefficients were determined from the photometric
data of the standard stars with a weighted least-square method. The coefficients are presented with photometric
zero points in Table~\ref{tab2}. Using \textsc{IRAF}/\textsc{DAOPHOT} we conducted point spread function (PSF) photometry
on stars in the target images using a small fitting radius of 1 full width at half-maximum (FWHM; $\leq$ 1.0 arcsec),
and then aperture correction was done using the aperture photometry of bright, isolated stars with a photometric
error smaller than 0.01 mag in individual target images. The instrumental magnitude was
transformed to the standard magnitude and colors using the transformation equations below
(Paper 0):
\begin{equation}
M_{\lambda} = m_{\lambda} - (k_{1\lambda} - k_{2\lambda}C)\cdot X + \eta _{\lambda} \cdot C
+ \alpha _{\lambda} \cdot \hat{UT} + \zeta _{\lambda}
\end{equation}
\noindent where $M_{\lambda}$, $m_{\lambda}$, $k_{1\lambda}$, $k_{2\lambda}$, $\eta _{\lambda}$,
$C$, $X$, $\alpha _{\lambda}$, $\hat{UT}$, and $\zeta _{\lambda}$ are the standard magnitude,
instrumental magnitude, the primary extinction coefficient, the secondary extinction coefficient,
transformation coefficient, relevant color, air mass, time-variation coefficient, time difference relative
to midnight, and photometric zero point, respectively. We adopted the SNUCam transformation coefficients
($\eta _{\lambda}$), which were recently refined from those in \citet{LSBKI09}.
\subsection{Kuiper 61" Telescope of Steward Observatory}
The observations of NGC 1624 and NGC 1931 were made on 2011 October 29, using the Kuiper 61"
telescope (f/13.5) of Steward Observatory (SO) on Mt. Bigelow in Arizona, USA. We obtained images
with the Mont4k CCD camera and 5 filters (Bessell $U$, Harris $BV$, Arizona $I$, and H$\alpha$). The
FOV is about $9\farcm7 \times 9\farcm7$. Later, additional images of NGC 1931 were taken
on 2013 February 5, without the H$\alpha$ filter. Since typical seeing was $1\farcs0$ --
$2\farcs0$ (7 -- 14 pixels), the $3\times3$ binning mode ($0\farcs42$ per pixel) allowed us not only to obtain
an appropriate FWHM ($\sim$ 3 pixels) for PSF photometry but also to decrease the readout time
($\sim$ 10s). In order to obtain reliable transformation relations for this photometric system across
a wide color range, we observed several extreme red and blue standard stars \citep{KWRMC98} as
well as a large number of equatorial standard stars \citep{MMLCE91} at air masses of 1.2 -- 2 during
the run. In addition, a few Landolt standard star fields (Rubin 149, 152, and PG 2213 -- \citealt{L92}),
which contain both extreme red and blue stars within a small region, were also observed to obtain the secondary extinction
coefficients. The observations are summarized in Table~\ref{tab1}, and the finder chart (solid line) for the stars brighter than
$V = 18$ mag is shown in Figure~\ref{fig1}.
The Mont4k photometric system of the Kuiper 61" telescope was used in this survey project for the first time. Understanding
the characteristics of the photometric system is essential for obtaining reliable photometric data.
We address the characteristics and transformation relations for the Mont4k CCD photometric system
in the Appendix. Atmospheric extinction coefficients and photometric zero points obtained from the
aperture photometry of the standard stars are presented in Table~\ref{tab2}.
PSF photometry and aperture correction for the images of NGC 1624 and NGC 1931 were
carried out using the same procedures as described in the previous section. The instrumental magnitude
was transformed to the standard magnitude and colors using the transformation equations addressed
in the Appendix.
\subsection{The Consistency and Completeness of the Photometric Data}
We have confirmed from a series of studies \citep{LSKI11,LSKBK14,LSKBP14} that the
photometric data obtained from the photometric system of the AZT-22 1.5m telescope at MAO
are well-tied to the Johnson-Cousins standard system. But we need to check the homogeneity
of the photometric data obtained with the Mont4k CCD camera of the Kuiper 61" telescope.
Since NGC 1624 was observed with the two different photometric systems, it was
possible for us to compare our photometric data directly. Figure~\ref{fig2} shows
the comparison between a few sets of modern CCD photometry. Bold dots (black) in the upper panels
represent the differences between the photometric data obtained at MAO and SO.
We confirmed that our photometry is in good agreement within 0.01 mag
(see also Table~\ref{tab3}). The imaging data for NGC 1931 were taken with the Mont4k CCD
camera of the Kuiper 61" telescope at two different epochs. The internal consistency of the two data sets
was examined as shown by bold dots in the lower panels of Figure~\ref{fig2}. The photometry is well
consistent with each other within 0.01 mag. We averaged the data sets for each cluster
using a weighted average scheme \citep{SL95}.
A couple of photometric studies with a modern CCD camera have been made
for NGC 1624 (e.g. \citealt{SuBa06,JPO11}). The combined photometric data for the
cluster were compared with those of the previous studies as marked by squares and
triangles in the upper panels of Figure~\ref{fig2} (see also Table~\ref{tab3}). The
photometric data of \citet{SuBa06} are far different from ours, particularly
the $V$ magnitudes. All their colors are systematically redder than the others.
There is also a color-dependent trend for $U-B \leq 0.7$.
The difference between the photometry of \citet{JPO11} and ours is acceptable in $V$
and $B-V$, whereas the other colors show systematic differences. Although their $U-B$ color
is in a good agreement with ours for $U-B \leq 0.4$, for redder stars their $U-B$ colors are
systematically redder than ours. Their $V-I$ color appears bluer than that of the others.
We note that the previous sets of CCD data for NGC 1624 are likely to
involve problems in the photometric standardization. On the other hand, the photometry of NGC 1931 by
\citet{PES13} is in good agreement with ours. We present a summary of the comparison
in Table~\ref{tab3}.
Statistical analysis based on photometric data requires the completeness
of the photometry to be at least 90 percent. In the case of sparse open clusters, the
completeness limit is not very different from that obtained in nearby field region,
and that relates to the turnover magnitude in the luminosity function of the
observed stars. We estimated the completeness of our photometry from the turnover in the luminosity
function of all the observed stars, by assuming a linear slope across the entire
magnitude range. Our photometry is complete down to $V = 19$ mag ($\sim 2 \ M_{\sun}$) for
NGC 1624 and 20 mag ($\sim 1 \ M_{\sun}$) for NGC 1931. However, the completeness limit may
be an upper limit because the bright nebulae surrounding the young open clusters may prevent the
detection of faint stars. The photometric data from this work are available
in the electronic tables (Table~\ref{tab4} and \ref{tab5}) or from the authors (BL or HS).
\section{PHOTOMETRIC DIAGRAMS}
Photometric studies for young open clusters are based on the two-color diagram (TCD)
and color-magnitude diagrams (CMDs). With well-calibrated empirical
relations and stellar evolution models, fundamental parameters, such as reddening,
distance, and age, can be determined from these photometric diagrams. The fundamental
parameters allow us to investigate the local spiral arm structure in the Galaxy (Paper 0) as well as the
properties and evolution of the dust grain through the reddening law \citep[Paper 0, etc]
{PUNO03,LSKI11,LSKBK14,LSKBP14,SB14}. In addition, the age distribution of stars can be used to
study the star formation history within a star-forming region \citep[etc]{PaSt99,SHBMC04,
SB10,LSKBP14} and the pattern speed of the Galactic spiral arms \citep{DL05}. These studies
should be based on reliable membership selection. In the following sections, we present
membership selection criteria, the reddening law, and fundamental parameters of
NGC 1624 and NGC 1931 with TCDs and CMDs.
\subsection{The Extent of NGC 1624 and NGC 1931}
As most open clusters are unbound stellar systems, i.e. expanding systems
\citep{LL03}, it is believed from theoretical approaches, that gas expulsion
affects the dynamical evolution of the remaining clusters significantly \citep{T78,
GB06}. In some SFRs, new generation stars are still forming in the natal
clouds swept away by the stellar wind and the UV radiation from high-mass stars
(e.g. \citealt{SHBMC04,KAG08,LSKBP14}). The observed structure is basically a
projection onto the sky. Hence, it is difficult to determine the physically meaningful
extent of young open clusters. Alternatively, radial surface density profile
(RSDP) gives an area encompassing almost all the members of a cluster. This is a
fundamental method to define the size of clusters.
We determined the radius of NGC 1624 assuming a circular shape. The center of the
cluster was set to the position of the brightest star NGC 1624-2. The stars
observed in the $V$ band were counted within concentric rings increased
by $0\farcm5$. The RSDP of NGC 1624 is plotted in Figure~\ref{fig3}. The error in the
surface density was assumed to follow Poisson statistics. The surface density decreases
with the increasing distance from the center until it indistinguishably converges to the
surface density of field stars. The distance from the center to the convergent point
($\sim 2\farcm5$) was assigned as the radius of the cluster. \citet{JPO11} also obtained
a consistent value ($2\farcm0$) with ours using their optical and 2MASS near-infrared (NIR)
data.
The extent of NGC 1931 could not be determined from the RSDP. \citet{PES13}
presented the spatial distribution of PMS members in their figure 25. The spatial distribution
could not be confined to a small specific region within our small FOV ($\sim 10' \ \times \ 10' $) because
the PMS stars scattered across the emission nebula (Sh2-237). Given that no PMS member has been identified
northwards from $\delta \sim 34^{\circ} \ 18'$ \citep{PES13}, we assigned the southern region
covered by our observation as likely to encompass all the
members of the cluster. The area of these clusters is used to normalize the IMF as well as to
isolate members.
\subsection{Membership Selection}
The early-type stars (O -- B-type) can be unambiguously identified in the ($U-B$, $B-V$) TCD as they have
very blue $U-B$ colors (see figure 11 of Paper 0). In addition, the intrinsic colors and absolute
magnitude of these stars have been well calibrated in the optical passbands, so that the reddening and
distance of the stars can be reliably determined by comparing the observed colors and magnitude with
the intrinsic relations. These procedures are described in detail in the following sections. We identified early-type
members within specific reddening and distance ranges based on the ($U-B$, $B-V$) TCD (Figure~\ref{fig4})
and CMDs (Figure~\ref{fig5}). The membership selection criteria for the early-type
main sequence (MS) stars of NGC 1624 are (1) $V \leq 18$ mag, $0.5 \leq B-V \leq 0.9$, $-1.0 \leq U-B \leq 0.5$,
and $Q^{\prime} \leq -0.4$, where $Q^{\prime} \equiv (U-B) - 0.72(B-V) - 0.025E(B-V)^2$ (Paper 0),
(2) $E(B-V) > 0.8$ mag, (3) for late-B type members ($-0.4 < Q^{\prime} \leq -0.2$) the individual distance
modulus should be between ($V_0-M_V)_{\mathrm{cl}} - 0.75 - 2 \sigma _{V_0-M_V}$ and ($V_0-M_V)_{\mathrm{cl}}
+ 2 \sigma _{V_0-M_V}$, where ($V_0-M_V)_{\mathrm{cl}}$ and $\sigma _{V_0-M_V}$ are the distance modulus
of NGC 1624 and the standard deviation of the distance modulus, respectively. The factor -0.75 is introduced
to take into account the effect of equal mass binaries. The FOV of SNUCam ($18\farcm1 \times 18\farcm1$)
is wide enough to include the distributed population, most of which may not be associated with NGC 1624. In order
to prevent the inclusion of such stars we isolated only stars within a radius of $2\farcm5$ from the brightest
star NGC 1624-2. The star ID 1609 ($V = 14.94$, $V-I = 1.05$, $B-V = 0.87$, $U-B = 0.24$ ) was rejected
from the member list because the star is too bright to be the member of the cluster at a given color in the CMDs.
These processes of the membership selection for early-type MS stars were carried out iteratively. A total
of 14 stars were selected as the early-type MS members of NGC 1624.
Similar criteria were used to select the early-type MS members of NGC 1931. The criteria are
(1) $V \leq 17$ mag, $0.2 \leq B-V \leq 0.9$, $-1.0 \leq U-B \leq 0.4$, and $Q^{\prime}
\leq -0.4$, (2) $E(B-V) > 0.5$ mag, (3) 10.8 mag $\leq (V_0 - M_V)_{\star} \leq$ 12.3 mag for late-B type
members. Several field interlopers were identified from these criteria. We checked the color excess ratio
of the most probable members ($U-B \leq -0.1$) and excluded outliers with significantly different color
excess ratios from those of the most probable members. The abnormal color excess ratios of these outliers
are caused by the fact that less reddened foreground F or G-type stars would be regarded as highly reddened
early-type stars from the color-cuts. The star ID 314 ($V = 13.11$, $V-I = 0.53$, $B-V = 0.36$, $U-B = -0.31$) was originally selected
as an early-type member, however, its spatial position ($\Delta \alpha \sim -3\farcm23$, $\Delta \delta
\sim +5\farcm11$) is outside the cluster boundary. We regarded the star as a mid-B-type field interloper
at a similar distance, and therefore the star was excluded from the member list. A total
of 14 stars were assigned as early-type MS members of NGC 1931. It is worth noting that
BD+34 1074, which is one of the two brightest stars in NGC 1931, was resolved into four stars,
of which three (ID 857, 865, and 872) are also the early-type members identified here.
Most low-mass PMS stars have a circumstellar disk, and some of these disks exhibit significant accretion activity
\citep{LSKBK14,LSKBP14}. According to the standard accretion model for PMS stars \citep{US85,BBB88,K91},
material channeled from the circumstellar disk falls onto the surface of the central star along its magnetosphere.
Various emission lines and hot continuum excess emission arise from accretion columns, preshock infall region,
and the heated photosphere \citep{CG98,H99}. The generated energy is mainly released at ultraviolet (UV) wavelengths, so that
the accretion luminosity is related to the $U$ magnitude \citep{GHBC98,CG98}. Hence, a few
PMS stars with strong UV excess emission can be identified in the $U$ band photometry.
There is a dotted line parallel to the reddening vector in the ($U-B, B-V$) TCD (the left-hand panels
of Figure~\ref{fig4}). The stars with a bluer $U-B$ color than the dotted line
at a given $B-V$ color are either early-type stars or UV excess stars. The criteria for the PMS stars
with UV excess emission are (1) $\epsilon (U-B) \leq 0.1$, (2) $B-V > 1$ and $U-B < 0.72[(B-V)+0.5)]
- 0.9$, (3) stars within the empirical PMS locus \citep{SBCKI08} in the $(V, V-I)$ CMD (see Figure~\ref{fig5}).
The last criterion prevents the inclusion of background early-type stars. We found 3 and 4 PMS stars
with UV excess emission in NGC 1624 and NGC 1931, respectively.
H$\alpha$ photometry provides a good criterion to find PMS stars in young open clusters
($\leq$ 3 Myr). Since \citet{SBL97} achieved the successful detection of many PMS stars in
NGC 2264, this efficient technique has been used to search for PMS members in a series
of studies (e.g. \citealt{SBL98,SCB00,PSBK00,PS02,SBC04,SB04,SBCKI08,SSB13,
LSKBK14,LSKBP14}). In order to identify H$\alpha$ emission stars photometrically we have defined the
H$\alpha$ index as H$\alpha$ - ($V + I$)/2 \citep{SCB00}. As shown in the right-hand panels of
Figure~\ref{fig4}, stars with -0.2 (dashed line) or -0.1 mag (dotted line) smaller H$\alpha$ index than
the empirical photospheric level (solid line) of normal MS stars are selected as
H$\alpha$ emission stars or candidates. The H$\alpha$ emission stars and candidates ID 1897
($V = 18.68$, $B-V = 1.17$, $U-B = 0.41$), ID 2326 ($V = 18.97$, $B-V = 1.62$, $U-B = 1.42$), ID 2356
($V = 19.11$, $B-V = 1.36$, $U-B = 1.14$), and ID 2588 ($V = 19.12$, $B-V = 1.17$, $U-B = 0.44$)
in the FOV of NGC 1624 were regarded as foreground stars because their colors are similar
to those of less reddened foreground stars. In addition, the radius ($2\farcm5$) of the
cluster was also used to isolate the members. We found 9 H$\alpha$ emission stars and
candidates associated with NGC 1624. In the same way, we found 28 H$\alpha$
emission stars and candidates in NGC 1931, one of which (ID 596; $V = 19.30,
B-V =1.36, U-B = 1.00$) is likely a foreground late-type star.
The dust emission from circumstellar disks of PMS stars is prominent at infrared (IR) wavelength, particularly
the mid-infrared (MIR). A number of young stellar objects in various star-forming regions have been identified
through extensive imaging surveys with the {\it Spitzer} space telescope \citep[etc]{CMP08,GMM08,KAG08,
SSB09}. We used the {\it Spitzer} Galactic Legacy Infrared Mid-Plane Survey Extraordinaire
360-degree catalog (GLIMPSE360; \citealt{WAB08,WBM11}) to identify PMS members with MIR excess
emission. The GLIMPSE360 survey is a ``Warm Mission", so that only the
3.6 and 4.5 $\micron$ bands were available. Unfortunately, NGC 1624 ($l = 155\fdg356$, $b = 2\fdg616$)
was not covered in the survey program because of its high Galactic latitude. The catalog allows us to select
PMS members with a circumstellar disk in NGC 1931. A total of 1249
optical counterparts in the catalog were found within a matching radius of $1\farcs0$. We attempted
to identify the PMS members in the ($[3.6] - [4.5], V-I$) TCD as shown in Figure~\ref{fig6}. The majority
of the H$\alpha$ emission stars exhibited MIR excess emission. Stars with a $[3.6] - [4.5]$ color larger
than 0.2 mag (dashed line) were selected as PMS member candidates, and then the empirical PMS
locus \citep{SBCKI08} was used to isolate the PMS members among the candidates. From this procedure,
a total of 54 PMS stars with MIR excess emission were selected as members of NGC 1931. Although it is difficult to
make a detailed classification due to the absence of information in other IRAC bands (5.8 and 8.0 $\micron$),
most of them may be Class II objects (see also Figure 18 of \citealt{PES13}).
It is a well known observational fact that PMS stars, particularly classical T-Tauri (CTTS) stars, are
variable objects with an amplitude of 0.1 -- 2 mag in the form of irregular variation \citep{GMBHS07}.
The observations of NGC 1624 and NGC 1931 were made at two different epochs. The time difference
between the first and the second observation was about $\sim$ 4.9 and 1.2 years for NGC 1624 and
NGC 1931, respectively. Since the photometric errors from the averaging process used in section 2.3 (originally
from equation (2) of \citealt{SL95}) represent the consistency of magnitude and colors from several observations,
a photometric error larger than that expected from the distribution of errors with magnitude may be attributed
to a genuine variation in brightness. We investigated the photometric error of the stars observed more than
twice as shown in Figure~\ref{fig7}. The photometric errors ($\sigma _V$) in a given magnitude bin
($\Delta V = 1$ mag) were averaged, and then its standard deviation ($\sigma _{S.D.}$) was used as a criterion
for the variability of individual stars. If stars have variations larger than 0.03 mag in brightness and $\sigma _V > \langle
\sigma _V \rangle + 3 \sigma_{S.D.}$ in the range of $V = 10$ -- 21 mag, we assigned the stars as variables. The star
ID 727 in NGC 1931 showed a very large variation ($V = 16.34$ mag on 2011 Oct. 29 and $V = 14.86$ mag on 2013 Feb. 5).
We found 4 variable stars within the radius of NGC 1624. The variable star
ID 1733 has a red $U-B$ color similar to that of foreground stars. The $U-B$ color of the
star in 2011 was bluer by 0.24 mag than that observed in 2006. The star may be an
active late-type star in front of the cluster. The $V$ magnitude and $V-I$ color of the other
variable stars appear to be commensurate with those of the H$\alpha$ emission stars
in the PMS locus. A total of 16 stars were identified as variable stars in NGC 1931. The majority of the
variable stars were crowded into the cluster center. Their $V$ magnitudes and colors
are similar to those of other PMS members with H$\alpha$ and MIR excess emission,
some of which ($\sim 44$ percent) are indeed UV excess, H$\alpha$ emission, or
MIR excess emission stars. Thus, these variable stars were assigned as PMS members of
NGC 1931.
A total of 28 stars (14 early-type and 14 PMS stars) in NGC 1624 and 85 stars (14 early-type and
71 PMS stars) in NGC 1931 were selected as members. The star ID 1773 (No. 228 of \citealt{DLK08})
in NGC 1624 is the only star selected using 2 membership selection criteria (UV excess and H$\alpha$
emission), and we found 24 out of 71 PMS members in NGC 1931 satisfied more than 2 selection criteria.
The membership selection for early-type MS members is likely complete, however only a small fraction of
the PMS stars may have been selected as members of the clusters. According to a study of the young open cluster
NGC 1893 \citep{LSKBP14}, the detection efficiencies of H$\alpha$ photometry, {\it Spitzer} MIR,
and {\it Chandra} X-ray data turned out to be about 10, 24, and 85 percent for PMS stars ($> 1 \ M_{\sun}$),
respectively. This implies that X-ray emission from PMS stars is the most efficient criterion to identify the
remaining PMS stars. Although NGC 1624 has been observed using the {\it Chandra} X-ray Observatory
(ObsID 7473, PI Garmire), the exposure times were not long enough to detect PMS members. Using the
published X-ray source list of \citet{EPG10}, the optical counterparts of X-ray emission sources
and candidates were searched for with matching radii of 1.0 and 1.5 arcsec, respectively. We found only
2 X-ray emission sources and 1 candidate with optical counterparts. The brightest early-type member
NGC 1624-2 is known to be an X-ray emitter \citep{EPG10,WAM12}, and the others turned out to be
field interlopers given their colors. On the other hand, X-ray observations for NGC 1931 have not yet been
made. Extensive X-ray imaging observations are clearly required in order to study the nature of PMS stars
in detail based on complete membership lists. As of now, we merely anticipate that a few hundreds of
members may exist in each cluster. A discussion on the approximate number is addressed in a later section.
\subsection{Structure of the Clusters}
The structure of young open clusters gives us clues to dynamical evolution in the
early stages of cluster formation as well as the formation process of stellar clusters
\citep{EEPZ00}. Many efforts have been made to study the structure of open clusters
using the techniques of surface density distribution and minimum spanning
tree \citep[etc]{SBLKL99,SPO07,KAG08,GMM09,KSB10,JPO11,SSB13,LCS13,PES13}.
In this section, we describe the apparent structure of NGC 1624 and NGC 1931 using the
surface density distribution, with additional information from previous studies.
The appearance of the HII region Sh2-212 associated with NGC 1624 is close
to a symmetric shell structure. An inner region filled with hot ionized gas and a
shocked outer region constitute the apparent gas structure (see figure 1 of
\citealt{JPO11}). A molecular filament with different velocity components
in the range of -32 to -37 km s$^{-1}$ surrounds the southern part of the cluster,
stretching out to the north-west \citep{DLK08}. The filament incubates at least five
clumps, one of which is likely to be associated with an UCHII in the
western part of the cluster. The brightest star NGC 1624-2 (O7f?p -- \citealt{WSA10,SAW11}) is
located near the center of the cluster. Other members are distributed in the vicinity
of the star as shown in the left-hand panel of Figure~\ref{fig8}. We
obtained the surface density distribution of NGC 1624 using stars observed
in the $V$ band (contour). The concentration of stars appears
high in the center of the cluster, and the spatial distribution approximates to a circular shape.
On the other hand, NGC 1931 is enclosed within a
dusty molecular cloud (see figure 1 of \citealt{PES13}). The natal cloud also
exhibits a hierarchical structure. The inner region is filled with hot ionized gas
produced by the radiation from a few bright stars while polycyclic aromatic
hydrocarbon molecules are glowing in the outer region. The right-hand
panel in Figure~\ref{fig8} shows the spatial distribution of cluster
members. The early-type MS members appear to be divided into two groups,
a northern and a southern group. A high stellar density region is seen between
the groups, implying that mass segregation among the members may not yet be established.
While many variable PMS members are located in the dense region, the majority of
H$\alpha$ emission stars are found in the vicinity of the southern group. The PMS
members with MIR excess emission are spread out across the whole region, however the stars
in the northern part of the cluster show a weak concentration. The surface
density distribution (contour) reflects such an elongated
shape. The apparent shape is in a good agreement with the result of \citet{PES13}.
These observational properties may be related to the star formation history
within NGC 1931.
\subsection{Reddening and the Reddening Law}
As most open clusters are formed in the Galactic plane, a region where interstellar matter is
unevenly distributed, reddening corrections are crucial to obtaining reliable
physical quantities. The interstellar reddening is basically determined by comparing an observed
color with the intrinsic one. The ($U-B, B-V$) TCD is a very useful tool because the reddening
vector has been well established in the diagram [$E(U-B)/E(B-V) = 0.72 + 0.025E(B-V)$ -- Paper 0]. The intrinsic
color relations of Paper 0 were adopted to obtain the reddening of the individual early-type
members (see table 1 in Paper 0).
The reddening of NGC 1624 determined from 14 early-type members is in the range of
$E(B-V) = 0.83$ -- 1.01 mag, and the mean value is $\langle E(B-V) \rangle = 0.92 \pm
0.05$ (s.d.) mag. The result is in close agreement with that of previous studies, e.g.
$E(B-V) = 0.88$ -- 0.94 mag \citep{MFJ79}, 0.84 -- 0.87 mag \citep{CW84}, 0.70 -- 0.90
mag \citep{SuBa06}, and 0.76 -- 1.00 mag \citep{JPO11}. The reddening of NGC 1931
obtained from 14 early-type members ranges from $E(B-V) = 0.51$ -- 1.01 mag.
The mean reddening is $\langle E(B-V) \rangle = 0.74 \pm 0.17$ (s.d.) mag. This result is
also commensurate with that of previous studies, e.g. $E(B-V) = 0.49$ -- 0.93 mag
\citep{MFJ79}, 0.47 -- 1.00 mag \citep{PM86}, 0.55 -- 1.00 mag \citep{BPMP94},
0.52 -- 0.72 mag \citep{BB09}, and 0.50 -- 0.90 mag \citep{PES13}. The dispersion in
the reddening indicates that there is differential reddening across each cluster. The
differential reddening in NGC 1624 appears to be less significant than that found in NGC 1931.
Unlike early-type MS stars, it is difficult to determine the reddening for the PMS stars
because the intrinsic colors can be altered by hot and cold spots on the surface, accretion
activities, and the obscuration by a circumstellar disk \citep{GMBHS07}. Simultaneous imaging
(color) and spectroscopic (spectral type) observations are required to determine the reddening
of individual PMS stars accurately. In the absence of such data, we estimated the reddening of
PMS stars by using a weighted-mean reddening value at a given position from the reddening distribution of
the early-type members, where the weight was given by an exponential
function with respect to the distance from the individual early-type members.
The reddening law toward young open clusters provides an opportunity to study the spatial
distribution of interstellar matter in the Galaxy as well as the
dust evolution in SFRs. The ratio of total-to-selective extinction ($R_V$) is a basic tool
to investigate the reddening law, being also a crucial parameter to correct the total
extinction in the visual band. The parameter is closely related to the size distribution
of dust grains. The $R_V$ found in several extremely young SFRs present deviations
from the normal reddening law \citep{G10,HSB12}. Previous studies on NGC 1624
have adopted the normal reddening law ($R_V = 3.1$, \citealt{CW84,
JPO11}), while \citet{PES13} showed, from photometric and polarimetric data, that the
reddening law toward NGC 1931 is slightly different from that found in the
general ISM. In order to check the reddening law toward
these clusters we investigated various color excess ratios in the optical and
IR passbands as performed in the series of studies \citep{KSB10,LSKI11,HSB12,
SSB13,LSKBK14,LSKBP14}.
\citet{LSKBK14} have noted that several mid -- late-B-type MS stars in the young
open cluster IC 1848 have a bluer color than that of normal B-type MS stars. Since
the bluer color may not reflect the genuine photospheric color of
the stars, the early-type members with $U-B \leq 0.3$ for NGC 1624 and with $U-B \leq -0.2$
for NGC 1931 were chosen to avoid such a color anomaly. We used 2MASS NIR data (tagged
as a photometric quality flag `AAA') as well as our optical data for the stars. For MIR data, the {\it Spitzer} GLIMPSE360
catalog \citep{WAB08,WBM11} was used to obtain the $V$-MIR color excess. The various
color excesses $E(V-\lambda)$ in the optical and IR passbands were computed by comparing
the observed colors with the intrinsic relations from Paper 0 and Sung et al. (in preparation).
The $R_V$ is expressed as a linear relation for each color excess ratio $E(V-\lambda)/E(B-V)$
\citep{GV89,SSB13}. We present the color excess ratios of the cluster members in Figure~\ref{fig9}.
The thick solid line (blue) in the figure represents the slope corresponding to the normal
reddening law ($R_V = 3.1$).
There is a foreground early-type star in the direction of NGC 1624 which was helpful
to check the difference between the general ISM and the intracluster medium (ICM). As shown
in the upper panels of Figure~\ref{fig9}, all the color excess ratios consistently indicate
that the ICM of NGC 1624 is indistinguishable from the general ISM. The mean
$R_V$ obtained from different color excess ratios was $3.12 \pm 0.01$ (s. d.).
This result is in good agreement with that examined by \citet{JPO11}, implying that
dust evolution in the cluster had already progressed or no grain growth had occurred
in the natal cloud. We adopted $R_V = 3.1$ and obtained a mean extinction of $\langle
A_V \rangle = 2.85 \pm 0.17 $ mag. On the other hand, there was no available foreground early-type star
toward NGC 1931 for checking the foreground reddening law. Given that the reddening
law toward the neighbouring clusters NGC 1893 and Stock 8 turned out to be normal \citep{JPO08,EPM11,LSKBP14},
we assumed that the foreground reddening law in the direction of NGC 1931 was likely to be normal. In the lower
panels of Figure~\ref{fig9}, the color excess ratios of the members show a significant deviation
from the normal reddening law. It implies that the size distribution of dust grain in the ICM of NGC 1931
is far different from that found the general ISM. Thus, the total extinction in $V$ band toward
the cluster should be divided into two components as below:
\begin{equation}
A_V = R_{V,\mathrm{fg}}\times E(B-V)_{\mathrm{fg}} + R_{V,\mathrm{cl}}\times [E(B-V) - E(B-V)_{\mathrm{fg}}]
\end{equation}
\noindent where $A_V$, $R_{V,\mathrm{fg}}$, $R_{V,\mathrm{cl}}$, $E(B-V)_{\mathrm{fg}}$, and $E(B-V)$
represent the total $V$ band extinction, the foreground $R_V$, intracluster $R_V$,
foreground reddening, and total reddening, respectively. As mentioned above,
$R_{V,\mathrm{fg}} = 3.1$ was adopted for the foreground component. We simultaneously
determined $E(B-V)_{\mathrm{fg}}$ and $R_{V,\mathrm{cl}}$ from the $V$-IR color excess ratios
using a $\chi ^2$ fitting method. The star ID 800 shows significant excess
emission at all the wavelengths. Another star ID 872 with a photometric quality flag
`EEE' in the 2MASS catalog also exhibits excess emission in the MIR passbands.
We did not include these stars in the examination of the reddening law.
The mean foreground reddening was found to be $E(B-V)_{\mathrm{fg}} = 0.417 \pm 0.005$ (s. d.) mag,
corresponding to a point of contact between foreground (thick solid line) and intracluster
(thin solid line) components in the lower panels of Figure~\ref{fig9}. This value is in
good agreement with the smallest reddening of the neighbouring cluster NGC 1893
[$E(B-V) = 0.418$ mag, \citealt{LSKBP14}], which is likely the amount of reddening in
front of the clusters. The mean intracluster $R_{V,\mathrm{cl}}$ determined from $V$-IR
color excess ratios was found to be $5.2 \pm 0.3$ (s. d.). The slope corresponding to the
$R_{V,\mathrm{cl}}$ is shown by thin solid lines in the lower panels of Figure~\ref{fig9}.
The $E(V-I)/E(B-V)$ color excess ratio gives an intracluster $R_{V,\mathrm{cl}}$ of
4.3 (dashed line). The value is significantly different from the mean $R_{V,\mathrm{cl}}$
obtained from the $V$-IR colors excess ratios. We attempted to check our $V-I$
colors. As discussed in Section 2.3, there is no considerable systematic difference
between the photometry of \citet{PES13} and ours. The observations of NGC 1624
was made on the same night, and the multiwavelength study on the reddening
law showed a consistent result in the optical -- NIR passbands. Hence, our
photometry and the adopted empirical relations of Paper 0 do not suggest
any serious systematic problem. A similar aspect was found in the reddening law
toward the starburst cluster Westerlund 2 \citep{HPS14}. The authors attributed this
discrepancy to the unknown behaviour of the $V-I$ color in heavily reddened situations.
It needs to be confirmed whether or not the linear relation between $R_V$ and $E(V-I)/E(B-V)$
is applicable to extremely young and dusty SFRs. We leave this issue for future work in our survey project.
Using the IR extinction curve of \citet{FM07} (equation 4) we tested the reddening
law once more as shown in Figure~\ref{fig10}. The extinction curve of NGC 1624 (open circles
in the upper panel) is close to the mean Galactic extinction curve (dashed line -- $k_{\mathrm{IR}} =
1.06$ and $R_V = 3.00$ -- \citealt{FM07}), while that of NGC 1931 still shows a conspicuous
deviation from the mean curve with a somewhat large scatter. The $R_V$ was determined
by a $\chi ^2$ fitting method, and the result was $R_V = 3.8 \pm 0.1$ ($1/\lambda
< 1 \micron ^{-1}$). However, we cannot accept that a small specific column throughout the
sky can be filled with significantly large dust grains, although a global variation of $R_V$ along the
Galactic longitude was found \citep{W77,SB14}. We derived the ICM component
in the extinction curve after subtracting a foreground reddening of $E(B-V)_\mathrm{{fg}} = 0.42$ mag.
The lower panel of Figure~\ref{fig10} shows the extinction curve of the ICM component. We found
$R_{V,\mathrm{cl}}$ of $5.5 \pm 0.3$ using the same procedure as above. The result is reasonably
consistent with that obtained from Figure~\ref{fig9} within the uncertainties. We note
that the $E(V-I)/E(B-V)$ color excess ratio seems to be ambiguous in this
analysis because it is commensurate with the mean Galactic extinction curve as well as
the IR extinction curve of the cluster ($R_{V,\mathrm{cl}} = 5.5$).
We adopted the segmented reddening law toward NGC 1931 as presented in
Figure~\ref{fig9} [$R_{V,\mathrm{fg}} = 3.1$, $E(B-V)_{\mathrm{fg}} = 0.42$ mag, and
$R_{V,\mathrm{cl}} = 5.2$] and obtained a mean extinction of $\langle A_V
\rangle = 2.97 \pm 0.88$ mag. This result is somewhat different from that obtained through a polarimetric
and photometric method ($R_V = 3.2$ -- 3.3 -- \citealt{PES13}). A reason is that the Serkowski
law \citep{SMF75} may not be applicable in the extremely young and dusty SFRs because of the
efficiency and time scale for grain alignment, the probable complex structure of the magnetic field
in the ICM, as well as the depolarization effect by foreground dust grains. The other reason is that
the authors did not consider the foreground and intracluster components separately, and therefore
their $R_V$ could be underestimated. Nevertheless, their results also suggest that the reddening
law in the direction of NGC 1931 is not normal. We conclude that the evolution of dust grains within
the cluster is still in progress.
\subsection{Distance}
Young open clusters ($<$ 10 Myr) are a useful tracer of the local spiral arm structure
in the Galaxy \citep{DL05}. We have been using the zero-age main sequence (ZAMS)
fitting method to determine distances to open clusters in a series of studies. The canonical
ZAMS fitting method should be made after correction for interstellar reddening. In order
to reduce uncertainties arising from the reddening correction, Paper 0 introduced
the reddening-independent indices as below:
\begin{equation}
Q_{VI} \equiv V - 2.45(V - I)
\end{equation}
\begin{equation}
Q_{VJ} \equiv V -1.33(V -J)
\end{equation}
\begin{equation}
Q_{VH} \equiv V - 1.17(V -H)
\end{equation}
\begin{equation}
Q_{VK_{S}} \equiv V - 1.10(V - K_{S})
\end{equation}
\noindent The modified Johnson $Q$ [$Q^{\prime} = (U-B) - 0.72(B-V)-0.025E(B-V)^2$]
is used as the abscissa of new CMDs. These reddening-independent indices
give a few advantages in ZAMS fitting
procedure. The indices are based on $UBVIJHK_S$ multicolor photometry, and
thus the ZAMS fitting to the CMDs of young open clusters can be made consistently
with respect to different colors. The colors of early-type stars are less affected by
metallicity effects because few strong metallic lines apart from a few light
elements are, in general, found in their spectra. We have determined the distance of
young open clusters using these indices \citep{LSKBK14,LSKBP14}.
A large fraction of high-mass stars constitute binary systems
\citep{SMK12}. The luminosity of such stars appears higher than that expected from ZAMS stars at
a given color or effective temperature. In addition, physical properties, such as stellar
rotation and overshooting, cause the MS band to be wider in the high-mass regime \citep{MP13}. Therefore,
the faintest MS stars at a given color in the CMDs have been regarded as ZAMS
stars \citep{JH56}. It is worth noting that some of the early-type members may possibly
reveal a color anomaly as mentioned in the previous section. Allowing for this point we
carefully fitted the ZAMS relations of Paper 0 to the lower ridge line of the cluster sequence
in Figure~\ref{fig11} after adjusting the relations above and below it. The lower ridge line
could be confined between the ZAMS relations (dashed lines) shifted by $\pm$ 0.2 -- 0.3 mag
for each cluster. The fitted distance modulus of NGC 1624 and NGC 1931 was $13.9 \pm 0.2$
mag ($6.0 \pm 0.6$ kpc) and $11.8\pm0.3$ mag ($2.3 \pm 0.3$ kpc), respectively. This result
places NGC 1624 ($l = 155\fdg356$, $b = 2\fdg616$) in the outer arm and NGC 1931
($l = 173\fdg898$, $b = 0\fdg281$) in the Perseus arm.
Previous studies used either ZAMS or isochrone fitting in the determination of
distance. The distance to NGC 1624 obtained in this work is in good agreement with the results of previous studies,
e.g. 6.0 kpc \citep{MFJ79,SuBa06,JPO11} and 6.1 -- 6.5 \citep{DLK08}. It is interesting
that \citet{SuBa06} obtained a distance consistent with that of other studies although
their photometry shows a serious systematic difference in $V$ (Figure~\ref{fig2}).
\citet{CW84} obtained a distance of 10.3 kpc using spectroscopic parallax for 2 bright stars.
In their study, the stars were classified as O6I and B1III, respectively. Since their spectral
classification is somewhat different from that of a recent study for the brightest star NGC 1624-2 (O7f?p --
\citealt{WSA10,SAW11}), their distance may be shifted systematically. A similar discussion
has been made in \citet{JPO11}. In the case of NGC 1931, \citet{PES13} refined their previous
results \citep{PM86,BPMP94} and published a new distance of $2.3\pm0.3$ kpc. \citet{BB09}
obtained a distance of $2.4\pm0.3$ kpc from the 2MASS NIR photometry. Although \citet{MFJ79} reported a rather
smaller value (1.8 kpc), our result is in good agreement with that of more recent studies.
\section{HERTZSPRUNG-RUSSELL DIAGRAM}
The HRD is a basic tool to understand the evolution of
stars. The effective temperature ($T_{eff}$) of stars is a crucial parameter for constructing
the HRD. We used the relations published in Paper 0 (table 5) to obtain the $T_{eff}$
and bolometric correction for individual stars. The $T_{eff}$ of the
star NGC 1624-2 was determined from the spectral type-$T_{eff}$ relation. Although
the spectral type and luminosity class of the star seem to be uncertain - O5.5V
\citep{MFJ79}, O6I \citep{CW84}, O7f?p \citep{WSA10,SAW11}, and O6.5f?cp--O8f?cp
(a variation in the spectral type has been reported by \citealt{WAM12}), we assumed the star
to be an O7 MS star according to the recent classification \citep{SAW11,WAM12}. It is worth
noting that the absolute magnitude of NGC 1624-2 ($M_V =$ -4.66 mag) is reasonably
consistent with that of O7 MS stars ($M_V =$ -4.90 mag) rather than that of O7 supergiant
stars ($M_V =$ -6.05 -- -6.95 mag, see table 4 of Paper 0). The difference between an O7 MS and giant
star is only about 165 K in $T_{eff}$, and the stars have the same bolometric correction value (Paper 0).
If NGC 1624-2 is a supergiant star, the difference between MS and supergiant stars increases
up to 800 K in $T_{eff}$ and 0.1 mag in bolometric correction. The $T_{eff}$ of other early-type MS
stars was inferred from the color-$T_{eff}$ relations. We averaged the $T_{eff}$ estimated from each
color-$T_{eff}$ relation with weights.
We set the weights of $T_{eff}$ estimated from $U-B$ vs. $T_{eff}$
relation to be 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, and 2.5 in the $(U-B)_0$ color range of 0.07 to -0.1 mag, -0.1 to -0.3 mag,
-0.3 to -0.5 mag, -0.5 to -0.7 mag, and -0.7 to -1.2 mag, respectively, set it to be 0 for late-type stars.
The temperature sensitivity of the $V-I$ color is not high enough to estimate the $T_{eff}$ of early-type stars. We assigned
each weight of $T_{eff}$ inferred from $B-V$ vs. $T_{eff}$ relation and $V-I$ vs. $T_{eff}$ relation to 1.0 and
0.5 for stars with $(B-V)_0 < -0.24$ mag. For MS stars with $(B-V)_0 < 0.18$ mag, the weights of $T_{eff}$
estimated from $B-V$ vs. $T_{eff}$ relation and $V-I$ vs. $T_{eff}$ relations were set to be 1.0 and 0.7, respectively.
Since the $V-I$ color is a good
temperature indicator for cool stars, we only used $V-I$ vs. $T_{eff}$ relations \citep{B95,BCP98} for
PMS stars. The bolometric correction values for all the members were inferred from their $T_{eff}$
using table 5 in Paper 0. We present the HRD of NGC 1624 and NGC 1931 in Figure~\ref{fig12}.
The brightest star in NGC 1624 is an O7 star \citep{WSA10,SAW11}. If the star is a MS
star with solar metallicity, its lifetime is smaller than 10 Myr according to \citet{M13}.
On the other hand, the spectral type of the most luminous star in NGC 1931 is
somewhat uncertain. \citet{PES13} argued that the main ionizing sources of Sh2-237 may be
two B2 stars. The MS lifetime of such stars is tens of millions of years. If the stars are in the MS stage,
the lifetime is the upper age limit of the cluster. We superimposed a few isochrones (solid lines)
constructed from the stellar evolution models of \citet{EGE12} and \citet{SDF00}
on the HRD of NGC 1624 with several evolutionary tracks (dashed lines). The position of NGC 1624-2 in the HRD
is well matched to the 4 Myr isochrone, and thus the turn-off age is about
4 Myr. We also used the isochrones interpolated from the stellar evolution models of
\citet{BMC11} for the initial chemical composition of the Galaxy and Large
Magellanic Cloud (LMC), where the evolutionary tracks with the similar initial rotation
velocity to that of \citet{EGE12} were selected. The isochrone for the chemical composition of the
Galaxy gives an age of 3.3 Myr, while the 3.8 Myr isochrone for the slightly lower LMC
metallicity appears to well predict the $T_{eff}$ and $M_{bol}$ of NGC 1624-2.
A systematic uncertainty of the turn-off age arising from the difference in metallicity may
be about 0.5 Myr.
In the case of NGC 1931, it is impossible to infer the turn-off age because
the most luminous star ID 872 in NGC 1931 is below the ZAMS line. The $U-B$
color of the star became bluer by $\sim$ 0.1 mag from 2005 to 2013 (the data from \citealt{PES13}).
Another early-type stars ID 629 and 854 also showed a similar variation
in the $U-B$ color. The mysterious young stellar object Walker 90 found in the young
open cluster NGC 2264 has also shows such a variation in its spectral type as well as colors
for the last $\sim$ 50 years (from A3 to B4, \citealt{PMAJ08} and references therein).
The observational properties of the star, such as an abnormal reddening law of $R_V = 3.6$ -- 7.0,
the inverse P-Cygni profile of Balmer lines, IR excess emission, and non-photospheric
UV continuum, indicate that the star is likely an intermediate-mass PMS star with an
accretion disk \citep{PMAJ08}. The star ID 872 in NGC 1931 also showed similar
photometric properties (the variation in $U-B$ color, an abnormal reddening law, and
IR excess emission) to those of Walker 90 although its spectral features were not
confirmed. If the star is at the analogous evolutionary stage to Walker 90, the age of NGC 1931 can
be conjectured from the age of the S Mon group within NGC 2264 (1.6 -- 3.0 Myr, \citealt{SB10})
Most of the PMS members in the two clusters have masses smaller than 3 $M_{\sun}$.
The number of PMS members identified in NGC 1624 is insufficient to
investigate the age distribution. The star ID 1773, which is
known as the main ionizing source of UCHII at the border of NGC 1624, is likely a
PMS star at a very early evolutionary stage. The age of the star seems to be younger
than 1 Myr, indicating that star formation is currently taking place in the cluster.
We estimated the mass accretion rate of the star using its UV excess emission as
performed in previous studies \citep{RHS00,LSKBK14,LSKBP14}. The mass accretion
rate of the young PMS star is $\dot{M} = 3.98 \times 10^{-6} M_{\sun} \ \mathrm{yr}^{-1}$.
On the other hand, more than half of the PMS members are likely to be younger than 4 Myr.
There are three PMS members (2 H$\alpha$ emission and
1 UV excess stars) near the ZAMS. These stars seem to be older than
other members. However, if the stars have a nearly edge-on disk, their luminosities would be
underestimated. In addition, accretion activities can lead the colors of the stars
to be bluer, i.e. hotter $T_{eff}$.
In the HRD of NGC 1931 (the right panel of Figure~\ref{fig12}), most of the PMS
members are younger than 10 Myr, which was suggested by the open cluster
data base WEBDA\footnote{http://www.univie.ac.at/webda/}. It is worth noting that WEBDA
provided incorrect ages for some open clusters. The number of PMS members is
relatively larger than that identified in NGC 1624 because of its proximity as well as the
variety of the available data. We investigated the age distribution of the PMS members
(thick solid line) in Figure~\ref{fig13}, where the bin size is 0.5 Myr. In order to avoid binning
effects, another histogram (thin solid line) was plotted by shifting the bins by half the bin size.
A peak in the age distribution appears at 1.5 Myr. The median age is about 2.0 Myr with a
spread of 4.5 Myr, where the spread was defined as the age difference between the 10 and
90 percentiles in the cumulative age distribution of the PMS members \citep{SB10}. Since
all the PMS members were identified using membership selection criteria based on the observational
properties of warm circumstellar disks and accretion activities, the age distribution could
be biased to young active stars.
Previous studies estimated the turn-off age of NGC 1624 to be 4 Myr
\citep{SuBa06,JPO11}. Our estimate (4 Myr) is in good agreement with those.
Other evolution models by \citet{BMC11} for Milky Way and LMC metallicities
give a slightly younger age (3.3 and 3.8 Myr). The upper value of the ages of PMS members
($ \leq 4$ Myr) is also consistent with that of \citet{JPO11}. The turn-off age of NGC
1931 remains uncertain because the evolutionary stage of the brightest star is
ambiguous. For this reason, \citet{BB09} obtained a somewhat larger turn-off age ($10 \pm 3$ Myr),
while \citet{PES13} only suggested an upper value of 25 Myr. The latter reported a
mean age of $2 \pm 1$ Myr for the PMS stars. This is in good agreement with the median age
from this work. They also found a similar age spread ($\sim 5$ Myr) from their
CMD. We have further discussions on the age spread of PMS stars in Section 6.
\section{INITIAL MASS FUNCTION}
\subsection{Derivation}
The membership selection of PMS stars is likely incomplete because the membership selection
criteria used above are more likely to identify young active PMS stars rather than those in a quiescent
phase. A statistical method was therefore used to fill in the incomplete mass bins of the IMF.
We included all the stars within the PMS locus in the ($V, V-I$) CMD, that is, bona-fide members
plus any field interlopers. These
stars were then placed in the HRD following the same procedure as delineated in the previous section
(see Figure~\ref{fig12}). The mass of the individual stars was estimated in the HRD by comparing
their $T_{eff}$ and $M_{bol}$ with those from the evolutionary tracks. For the MS members,
the stellar evolution model of \citet{EGE12} was used to estimate the mass. The mass of
the PMS members and the field stars was inferred from the PMS evolution models of
\citet{SDF00}. In order to minimize the contribution of field interlopers, appropriate
control fields were chosen within the observed regions (the shaded area in Figure~\ref{fig1}). The stars
within the PMS locus in the control fields were assumed to be evenly distributed in
the direction of each cluster. The apparent mass of these stars was estimated by using the same
procedure as above, where the mean reddening and distance of the two clusters applied to the stars.
We note that the apparent mass does not mean real stellar mass.
The IMF is, in general, expressed as $\xi \equiv$ $N \over \Delta \log m \cdot S$,
where $N$, $\Delta \log m$, and $S$ represent the number of stars within a given
mass bin, the size of the logarithmic mass bin, and the area of the cluster,
respectively. We applied a slightly large bin size of $\Delta \log m = 0.4$ to include
as many stars as possible within a given mass bin. An even larger bin size of 1.0 was adopted for
the highest mass bin [$10 < M/M_{\sun} \leq 100$ -- we assumed the upper limit of stellar
mass ($M_{\mathrm{up}}$) to be 100 $M_{\sun}$] because of the small number of high-mass stars.
The number of stars was counted within each given logarithmic mass bin, and then that was
normalized by the size of the mass bin and the area of the clusters. The apparent IMF
of the field interlopers was obtained in the same way. In the case of NGC 1931, the
extent of the control field was smaller than that of the cluster, and therefore the number
of field interlopers was corrected by multiplying the areal ratio of the cluster to the control
field. Finally, the IMF of the two clusters was obtained by subtracting the contribution of field
interlopers. Figure~\ref{fig14} shows the IMF of the two clusters. In order to avoid
binning effects we shifted the mass bin by 0.2 and re-derived the IMF (open circle) in the
same way. The error of the IMF was assumed to follow Poisson statistics. The arrows
represent the lower limit of the IMF below the completeness limit of our photometry.
Using a least-square method we determined the slope of the IMF in the mass range of
3 -- 27 $M_{\sun}$ for NGC 1624 and 1 -- 18 $M_{\sun}$ for NGC 1931. The slope
is $\Gamma = -2.0 \pm 0.2$ for the former and $\Gamma = -2.0 \pm 0.1$ for the latter.
The IMF of these clusters appears far steeper than the Salpeter/Kroupa IMF
\citep{Sp55,K01,K02} as well as the results of previous studies, e.g. $\Gamma = -1.18$ to $-1.31$
for NGC 1624 \citep{JPO11} and $\Gamma = -1.15$ for NGC 1931 \citep{PES13}.
However, the small number of high-mass stars ($> 10 \ M_{\sun}$) and the upper limit of the stellar mass
which was required for the normalization of the IMF may be responsible for the
steep slope. The IMF of the well-studied young open cluster
NGC 2264 (dashed line, \citealt{SB10}) is shown in Figure~\ref{fig14} for comparison.
The IMF of the two clusters seems to resemble that of NGC 2264 within the uncertainties.
According to a recent review on the IMF \citep{OCH14} the IMF of
NGC 2264 is in good agreement with that of nearby SFRs. This may imply that the
star formation in NGC 1624 and NGC 1931 is not much different from that in
the solar neighbourhood. More discussion on the slope of the IMF is addressed in the next section.
We estimated the total number of members and the masses of the two clusters by
integrating their IMFs. The IMF in the low-mass regime (from the completeness limit
down to 0.25 $M_{\sun}$) was assumed to be that of NGC 2264. NGC 1624 hosts
$661^{+81}_{-81}$ members, and a total of $656^{+143}_{-10}$ stars constitute NGC
1931. The total mass of NGC 1624 and NGC 1931 is about $510^{+111}_{-111} \ M_{\sun}$
and $510^{+103}_{-75} \ M_{\sun}$, respectively. The uncertainty in the total masses was
propagated from the error of the IMF in given mass bins. The total mass is comparable to that
of a few small open clusters, e.g. $576 \ M_{\sun}$ for NGC 2264 (which is the sum
of masses of all members from \citealt{SB10}), $550^{+40}_{-40} \ M_{\sun}$ for
Praesepe \citep{KH07}, and 800 $M_{\sun}$ for the Pleiades \citep{ASMSB01}. These
clusters are two orders of magnitude lighter than the most massive starburst cluster
Westerlund 1 in the Galaxy ($> 50,000 \ M_{\sun}$, \citealt{CNCG05,GBSH11,LCS13}).
\subsection{Implications of the Slope of the IMF}
The IMF of NGC 1624 and NGC 1931 shows a steep slope for stars
with mass larger than 1 $M_{\sun}$. This could imply that low-mass
star formation is dominant in the clusters. According to the metallicity variation in the
Galactic disk \citep{YCF12} the chemical composition at the Galactocentric distance
of NGC 1624 ($R_{\mathrm{GC}} = 13.7$ kpc) and NGC 1931 ($R_{\mathrm{GC}} = 10.3$ kpc) is
expected to be 0.1 -- 0.3 dex lower than the solar metallicity. The temperature of
a molecular cloud may therefore be higher in the low metallicity environment because radiative cooling
by metallic ions will be lower \citep{CMP12}. Furthermore, there is a relation
between the mass accretion rate of a star and the temperature of a cloud ($\dot{M}
\propto T^{3/2}$, \citealt{SHT14}). As a result, high-mass stars may be formed advantageously in
such a low metallicity environment, rather than active low-mass star formation. However,
the IMF of the two clusters is inconsistent with this expectation.
In order to properly interpret the IMF of the clusters we will first discuss a few issues concerning
the subtraction of field stars, dynamical evolution and stochastic effects.
We carried out checks to see whether the subtraction of field interpolators
had been adequately carried out because had the contribution of field interlopers been improperly
subtracted within a given mass bin, the resultant IMF would be misleading. We
examined the $V$ band luminosity function (LF) of stars in each control field using
the synthetic stellar population model for the Galaxy \citep{RRDP03}. The synthetic LF
was scaled to have the same area as that of each control field. The observed
LF was compared with the synthetic one. The LF of stars in the control field for NGC 1931
($l = 173\fdg90$, $b = 0\fdg28$) is in good agreement with the synthetic one, while
the stellar population model overestimated the number of stars toward NGC 1624 at
$V \sim 19$ mag. Because of the Galactic warp found at $l = 90^{\circ}$ \citep{RRDP03},
the synthetic stellar population in the direction of NGC 1624 ($l = 155\fdg356$, $b = 2\fdg616$)
which is linearly interpolated from those between $l = 90^{\circ}$ and $180^{\circ}$ may
not warrant consistency with the observational result. Alternatively, we obtained the IMF of NGC 1624
selecting different control fields (the west region $\Delta \alpha = -6\farcm0$,
$\Delta \delta = +3\farcm5$ or the south-west region $\Delta \alpha = -7\farcm5$,
$\Delta \delta = -6\farcm5$ in Figure~\ref{fig1}). The slope of the IMF was about $\Gamma =
-2.2 \pm 0.3$ and $-2.0 \pm 0.3$, respectively. Hence, the uncertainty
arising from the subtraction of field interlopers has a negligible contribution
to the slope.
\citet{K01} has presented a segmented IMF based on compiled data. In
his alpha-plot, a non-negligible scatter was found in the mass range of 1 -- 100 $M_{\sun}$.
The author attributed the cause of the scatter to dynamical effects and
Poisson noise. It used to be believed that young open clusters were too young
to have undergone dynamical mass segregation. However, a few young open clusters show clear signs of mass
segregation, e.g. Arches cluster \citep{HSBHM13}, NGC 3603 \citep{PGA13},
NGC 6231 \citep{RM98,SSB13}, ONC \citep{HH98}, Westerlund 1 \citep{GBSH11,
LCS13}, etc. Several studies, through multiple sets of numerical simulation, suggested
that the mass segregation found in young clusters has a dynamical origin \citep{MVZ07,MB09,
A09,A10}. If dynamical evolution had efficiently operated within young clusters,
a number of low-mass members would have evaporated into the outskirts of the cluster
region. Consequently, one would expect the IMF to be biased toward bright stars, and therefore
show a shallow slope. The steep slope of the IMF in this work is inconsistent with this
expectation of the effects. Thus, the contribution of the dynamical effect may be less significant for the clusters.
The total number of members belonging to NGC 1624 and NGC 1931 is so small, that its measured
IMF is vulnerable to stochastic effects. In order to test for this effect on the slope of
the IMF, multiple sets of Monte Carlo simulation were conducted for three cases with the total number
of cluster members ($N_{\star} = 100$, 1,000, and 3,000). The Kroupa IMF
\citep{K01} was used as the underlying IMF for stars with mass larger
than 0.5 $M_{\sun}$. The simulation for each case was made 10,000 times.
The IMF of the model clusters was derived using the same procedure described as above.
The size of the mass bin was set to $\Delta \log m = 0.4$, while a
bin size of 1.0 was adopted for the highest mass bin if the number of stars
with mass larger than 10 $M_{\sun}$ was smaller than 5. Figure~\ref{fig15} displays
the distribution of $\Gamma$ with the total number of cluster members. The dispersion
of the distribution appears to be large in model clusters with a small number of members, while
the IMF of model clusters with a large number of members shows a higher consistency
with the underlying IMF. However, the possibility that the IMF of a given cluster has a slope
steeper than $\Gamma = -2.0$ is only about 10 percent in the case of $N_{\star} = 100$, and
the likelihood decreases with the increase of the total number of cluster members. It
implies that the possibility that the IMF of the two clusters in the present work exhibits a steeper
slope than $-2.0$ is about 1 percent. Therefore, the stochastic effect seems not to explain
our results reasonably. Although the Kroupa/Salpeter IMF provides a representative slope of
the stellar IMF in a given mass range, it remains to be seen whether the slope is universal
or not. Future work on the IMF of small, young open clusters will observationally be used
to examine this issue.
\section{DISCUSSIONS ON THE AGE SPREAD OF PMS STARS}
\citet{PaSt99,PaSt00,PaSt02} argued that the star formation activity within nearby
SFRs has persisted for about 10 Myr and that the star formation rate
may be accelerating in the present epoch, on timescales of 1 -- 2 Myr. Later,
\citet{PRFP05} found a significant depletion of lithium in four PMS members of
the Orion Nebula Cluster (ONC), and the result supported their idea
because it is known that most of lithium at the surface of stars with subsolar
mass are destroyed on timescales of $\sim$ 10 Myr. On the other hand,
\citet{H01,H03} refuted the extended star formation timescale invoking the
influences of binarity, variability, extinction, accretion activities, the inclusion of
field interlopers, and the birthline effects of intermediate-mass stars. \citet{JONML07}
found a small age spread of 2.5 Myr for NGC 2169. There are
still many debates on the age of PMS stars although the age distribution
is thought to be a key to understanding the processes of cluster formation.
Only a small number of PMS stars were identified as members of NGC 1624,
so we were unable to statistically investigate the age spread. The number of
the PMS members found in NGC 1931 barely allowed us to study their
age spread, although the membership is still incomplete. The age distribution
of the PMS members shows a spread of 4.5 Myr. We attempted to interpret
the observed age distribution. Several observational uncertainties affecting
the $T_{eff}$ and luminosity of PMS stars were considered,
e.g. photometric errors, reddening correction, and variability. \citet{H03} pointed
out that the inclusion of field interlopers can lead the observed age spread to
be larger. However, we believe that most of the PMS stars identified in this work are
bona-fide members of NGC 1931 because the membership selection criteria
were based on the well-known observational properties of such stars together
with the fundamental parameters of the cluster (see Section 3.2).
Contamination by field interlopers was excluded as a consideration.
We assessed the contribution of the observational uncertainties to the age
spread of PMS stars using a few sets of simple Monte-Carlo simulations.
NGC 1931 probably comprises more than 600 stars according to
the integration of the IMF. We set the number of artificial PMS stars to
600. The underlying IMF was assumed to be our result ($\Gamma = -2.0$)
in the mass range of 0.5 to 5 $M_{\sun}$. The age of the stars was set to be
1.5 Myr (the peak age of NGC 1931) with no intrinsic age spread.
Based on the PMS evolutionary models of \citet{SDF00} artificial PMS stars
were generated. $T_{eff}$ and luminosity were converted into $V_0$ magnitude
and $(V-I)_0$ color using the relations of \citet{B95} and \citet{BCP98}. We
introduced photometric errors with a similar distribution to the observed one.
The distribution of reddening was assumed to be a
normal distribution, where the mean reddening and $3\sigma$ dispersion
were set to be 0.74 and 0.17 mag, respectively. In order to reproduce
the extinction in the $V$ band we adopted the segmented reddening law as
shown in Section 3.4 [$E(B-V)_{\mathrm{fg}} = 0.42$ mag, $R_{V,\mathrm{fg}} = 3.1$, and
$R_{V,\mathrm{cl}} = 5.2$]. We re-analyzed the photometric data of the artificial stars
to investigate their age spread after correcting for the mean reddening.
Figure~\ref{fig16} displays the result of the Monte-Carlo simulation.
The resulting age spread of the artificial stars was about 0.8 Myr although the age of a few
PMS stars was overestimated. Hence, the photometric errors and the uncertainty
in the reddening correction may not be enough to explain the observed age
spread (4.5 Myr).
The color variability of PMS stars can also increase the age spread because
the position of the stars in the HRD is very sensitive to $T_{eff}$. We investigated
the variation of their physical quantities in the HRD using the data observed at
two different epochs. The variable PMS stars identified in this work changed by
-1.2 -- 1.5 mag in $V$ and -0.5 -- 0.5 mag in $V-I$ over the 1.2 years.
The variation in $V$ appeared larger than that in $I$. This aspect
may be related to accretion activities, as well as to variable reddening by
surrounding material \citep{BB90,GMBHS07}. Figure~\ref{fig17} shows the
HRD of the variable PMS stars. Assuming that the variation of reddening in the
line of sight is negligible on a timescale of 1 year, we examined the change in
age. The intermediate-mass PMS star ID 727 (the most luminous star in
the HRD) varied the most in $T_{eff}$ and luminosity over the 1.2 years.
As a result of this variation, the apparent age changed by 2 -- 3 Myr.
Some low-mass stars also revealed as large an age
variation although the change in the physical quantities was not as large as
those of the star ID 727. This is because the resolution for distinguishing the
age of PMS stars becomes low in the low-mass regime of the HRD. Consequently, the
variability of PMS stars very likely contributes to the observed age spread.
The fraction of PMS variables is at least 4.6 percent (16/351), where the total number
of PMS stars (denominator) down to our detection limit ($V \sim 22$ mag) was estimated
from integration of the IMF. This value is likely a lower limit. We expect more
PMS variables to exist in the cluster because stars varying on much
shorter or longer timescales may not have been identified in our observations.
A couple of Monte-Carlo simulations were performed assuming that
30 and 50 percent of the PMS members are variable. The variation in $V$
and $V-I$ was set to have a normal distribution with the same dispersion
as the observed one. The photometric errors and reddening were treated with
the same procedure as above. If we assume a variable fraction of 30 percent, the
resultant age spread was about 1.5 Myr. A spread of 2.6 Myr was found for
a variable fraction of 50 percent. These simple simulations showed that the variability of PMS stars
can contribute a portion of the observed age spread. However, additional sources
may still be required to explain the observed spread of 4.5 Myr.
We briefly mentioned in Section 3.3 that the structure of NGC 1931
may have resulted from its star formation history. If star formation propagated
in a specific direction, one could expect there to be a correlation between the location
and age of PMS stars. A systematic age variation on a few parsec
scale has been found in the young open cluster NGC 1893 \citep{SPO07,PSC13,
LSKBP14}. Such a star formation history can influence the age spread of PMS
stars. We investigated the age variation along the declination axis, as the cluster is elongated
in the north-south direction (Figure~\ref{fig8}).
PMS members with masses larger than 1.5 $M_{\sun}$ were excluded from this
analysis because evolutionary models for intermediate-mass PMS stars are likely
to overestimate the age of the stars \citep{SBL97,SBC04,H99}. We considered only
stars younger than 4 Myr to find their age variation clearly. Figure~\ref{fig18}
shows the age variation of the PMS members with declination. The age appears
to decline with the increase in declination. It implies that star formation has propagated
from south to north with a projected velocity of 6.8 km s$^{-1}$ according to the
slope of the age variation. The maximum age difference between the stars in the
northern and southern groups is about 0.7 Myr, on average. Hence, the star formation
history in NGC 1931 seems to contribute a small portion of the observed age spread.
In conclusion, a genuine age spread of PMS members is required to explain the
observed age spread, however the size of the spread may not be as large as the
timescale ($\sim 10$ Myr) argued by \citet{PaSt00,PaSt02}.
\section{SUMMARY}
NGC 1624 and NGC 1931 are small, young, open clusters in the direction
of the Galactic anticenter. These clusters are helpful in studying the property
of star formation in a different environment from the solar
neighbourhood. We performed $UBVI$ and H$\alpha$ photometry for the clusters
as part of the SOS project. This work provided homogeneous photometric
data as well as the comprehensive results for the clusters.
The members of the clusters were selected using various criteria. For NGC 1624,
we found 14 early-type and 14 PMS members (3 variable, 3 UV excess emission,
and 9 H$\alpha$ emission stars and candidates) from photometric criteria and H$\alpha$
photometry. On the other hand, 14 early-type and 71 PMS stars (16 variable, 4 UV
excess emission, 54 MIR excess emission, and 27 H$\alpha$ emission stars and candidates)
were identified as the members of NGC 1931 using photometric criteria, H$\alpha$
photometry, and the GLIMPSE360 catalog.
The reddening of individual early-type members was determined from the
($U-B, B-V$) TCD. The mean reddening was $\langle E(B-V) \rangle =
0.92 \pm 0.05$ mag for NGC 1624 and $0.74 \pm 0.17$ mag for NGC 1931.
The reddening law toward the clusters was examined using
various color excess ratios from the optical to NIR passbands (to MIR passbands
for NGC 1931). We confirmed that the reddening law toward and in NGC 1624
is normal. On the other hand, the early-type members of NGC 1931 exhibited
color excess ratios that far deviated from the normal reddening. It implies that the size
distribution of dust grains in the NGC 1931 ICM is somewhat different from that found in
the general diffuse ISM. The ratio of total-to-selective extinction for the ICM of NGC 1931 was
estimated to be $R_{V,\mathrm{cl}} = 5.2\pm 0.3$, indicating that the evolution of dust grains is
still ongoing.
We carried out ZAMS fitting to the reddening-independent CMDs
of the early-type members. As a result, NGC 1624 was found to be $6.0\pm 0.6$ kpc far away from
the Sun, and probably located in the outer arm. The distance to NGC 1931 was
about $2.3 \pm 0.2$ kpc, which places the cluster in the Perseus arm. Reddening-corrected
CMDs were converted to the HRD using the published temperature scales and
bolometric correction \citep{B95,BCP98,SLB13}. We performed isochrone fitting
to the HRD of the clusters. A turn-off age of NGC 1624 was estimated to be 4 Myr,
and the PMS members are likely to be younger than 4 Myr. The star ID 1773 associated
with the UCHII region turned out to be a very young PMS star with a high mass
accretion rate of $3.98 \times 10^{-6} M_{\sun} \ \mathrm{yr}^{-1}$. The most
luminous star in NGC 1931 seems to be a very young star with an accretion disk
given that the photometric properties were similar to those of Walker 90
in NGC 2264. Thus, the age of the star is likely to be 1.6 -- 3.0 Myr. We found
a median age of 2 Myr with a spread of 4.5 Myr for the age distribution of
the PMS members.
Finally, we derived the IMF of the clusters and determined the slope in the high-mass
regime ($1 > M_{\sun}$). The slope was $\Gamma = -2.0 \pm 0.2$ for NGC 1624
and $\Gamma = -2.0 \pm 0.1$ for NGC 1931, respectively. These results were somewhat different
from the Salpeter/Kroupa IMF. We attributed the steeper slope to a stochastic effect, the small number
of stars in the highest mass bin ($> 10 \ M_{\sun}$), and the assumed upper limit of
stellar mass. The IMF of the clusters exhibits a very similar shape to that of the well-studied young
open cluster NGC 2264 \citep{SB10}. It implies that the property of star formation in
the clusters may not be far different from that in nearby SFRs.
\acknowledgments
This work was partly supported by a National Research Foundation of Korea grant funded
by the Korean Government (Grant No. 20120005318) and partly supported by the KASI
(Korea Astronomy and Space Science Institute) grant 2014-9-710-02.
{\it Facilities:} \facility{AZT-22 1.5 m telescope}, \facility{Kuiper 1.55m telescope}.
|
\section{Introduction}\label{Intro}
{High dimensional data are now prevalent everywhere}
that include genomic data in biology, financial times
series data in economics, and natural language processing data in
machine learning and marketing. {The traditional
procedures that assume that sample size $n$ is large and dimension
$p$ is fixed are not valid anymore for the analysis of high dimensional data.} A significant amount of
research are made to resolve the difficulty from
the dimensionality of the data.
This paper considers the inference problem of large scale covariance
matrix whose dimension $p$ is large compared to the sample size
$n$. To be specific, we are interested in testing whether the covariance matrix
equals to a given matrix; $\mathcal{H}_0: \Sigma=\Sigma_0$, where $\Sigma_0$ can be set ${\rm I}_p$ without loss of generality.
The likelihood ratio
test (LRT) statistic for testing $\mathcal{H}_0:\Sigma={\rm I}_p$ is defined by
{
\begin{eqnarray} \nonumber
{\rm LRT}&=& \mathrm{tr} \big( {\bf S}_n) - \log |{\bf S}_n| -p = \sum_{i=1}^p \big( l_i - \log l_i - 1 \big),
\nonumber
\end{eqnarray}
where ${\bf S}_n$ is the unbiased and centered sample covariance matrix} and $l_i$ is the
$i-$th largest eigenvalue of the sample covariance matrix.
{When $p$ is finite, LRT follows the chi-square distribution with degrees of freedom $p(p+1)/2$ asymptotically. However, this does not hold when $p$ increases.} Its correct asymptotic distribution is computed by \citet{Bai2009} for the
case $p/n$ approaches $\gamma \in (0,1)$ and both $n$ and $p$ increase. They further numerically show that their asymptotic normal distribution defines a valid
procedure for testing $\mathcal{H}_0: \Sigma={\rm I}_p$.
The results of \citet{Bai2009} are refined by \citet{Jiang2012}, which include the asymptotic null distribution for the case $\gamma=1$. {Despite of the correction} of the null distribution, the sample
covariance is known to have redundant variability when $p$ is large, and
it still remains a general question that the LRT is asymptotically optimal for testing problem
in the $n,p$ large scheme.
{In this paper, it is shown that the corrected LRT can be further improved by introducing
a linear shrinkage component.}
In detail, we consider a modification of the LRT, denoted by regularized LRT (rLRT), defined by
\begin{equation} \label{eqn:rlrt-def1}
{\rm rLRT}= \mathrm{tr} \big( \widehat{\Sigma} \big) - \log |\widehat{\Sigma}| -p =
\sum_{i=1}^p \big( \psi_i - \log \psi_i - 1 \big),
\end{equation}
where $\widehat{\Sigma}$ is a regularized covariance matrix and
$\psi_i$ is the $i-$th largest eigenvalue of $\widehat{\Sigma}$.
Here, we consider the regularization via linear shrinkage:
{
\begin{equation} \label{eqn:cov-lin}
\widehat{\Sigma} \equiv \lambda {\bf S}_n + (1- \lambda) {\rm I}_p.
\end{equation}
}
We also occasionally notate ${\rm rLRT}(\lambda)$ to emphasize the use of the value $\lambda$.
The linearly shrunken sample covariance matrix (simply shrinkage estimator) is
known to reduce expected estimation loss of the sample covariance matrix \citep{Ledoit2004}.
It is also successfully applied to many high-dimensional procedures to resolve the
dimensionality problem. For example, \citet{Schafer2005} reconstruct a
gene regulatory network from microarray gene expression data using the
inverse of a regularized covariance matrix. \citet{Chen2011} propose
a modified Hotelling's $T^2$-statistic for testing high dimensional mean vectors and apply
it to finding differentially expressed gene sets.
We are motivated by the success of above examples and inspect whether the power can be
improved by the reduced variability via linear shrinkage. To the best of our knowledge, our work is
the first time to apply the linear shrinkage to the covariance matrix testing problem itself.
We derive the asymptotic distribution of the proposed ${\rm rLRT}(\lambda)$ under two scenarios,
(i) when $\Sigma = {\rm I}_p$ for the null distribution, and additionally (ii) when $\Sigma =
\Sigma_{\rm spike}$ for power study. Here $\Sigma_{\rm spike}$ means a covariance matrix from the
spiked population model \citep{Johnstone2001}, roughly it is defined as a covariance matrix whose
eigenvalues are all $1$'s but some finite nonunit `spike'. The spiked covariance matrix
assumed here includes the well known compound
symmetry matrix $\Sigma_{\rm cs}(\rho)= {\rm I}_p + \rho {\rm J}_p$,
where ${\rm J}_p$ is the $p \times p$ matrix of ones.
The main results show that ${\rm rLRT}(\lambda)$ has normal distribution in asymptotic under both (i)
and (ii); their asymptotic means are different but the variances are same. The main results are useful in
testing various one sample covariance matrices. To be specific, first, in testing $\mathcal{H}_0:
\Sigma={\rm I}_p$, (i) provides the asymptotic null distribution of ${\rm rLRT}(\lambda)$. Second,
combining (i) and (ii)
provides the asymptotic power for an arbitrary spiked alternative covariance matrix
including $\Sigma_{\rm cs}(\rho)$. Finally, the results with $\lambda=1$ provide various asymptotic
distributions of the corrected LRT. Among these many applications, in this paper, we particularly
focus on the LRT for testing $\mathcal{H}_0: \Sigma={\rm I}_p$, which has long been studied by many
researchers \citep{Anderson2003,Ledoit2002,Bai2009,Chen2010,Jiang2012}.
The paper is organized as follows. In Section \ref{RMT}, we briefly review results of the random matrix theory
that are essential to the asymptotic theory of the proposed rLRT. The results include the limit of empirical spectral distribution
(ESD) of the sample covariance matrix and the central limit theorem (CLT) for linear spectral statistics
(LSS). In Section \ref{MainRes}, we formally define the rLRT, and prove the asymptotic normality of the rLRT when
the true covariance matrix $\Sigma$ is ${\rm I}_p$ or $\Sigma_{\rm spike}$.
In Section \ref{Num}, the results developed in Section \ref{MainRes} are applied to testing $\mathcal{H}_0: \Sigma={\rm I}_p$. Numerical study is provided to compare the powers of the LRT and other existing methods including the corrected LRT and other non-LRT tests by \cite{Ledoit2002} and \cite{Chen2010}.
In Section \ref{Disc}, we conclude the paper with discussions of several technical details of the rLRT, for example, close spiked eigenvalues.
\section{Random matrix theory}\label{RMT}
In this section, some useful properties of linear spectral statistics of the sample covariance matrix
are introduced. The true covariance matrix $\Sigma$ is identity or that from a spiked population model.
The following notation is used throughout the paper. Let $\rm M$ be a real-valued symmetric matrix of size $p \times p$ and $\alpha_j({\rm M})$ be the $j-$th largest
eigenvalue of the matrix $\rm M$ with natural labeling $\alpha_p({\rm M}) \le \cdots \le \alpha_1
({\rm M})$. The \emph{spectral distribution} (SD) for $\rm M$ is defined by
{
\begin{equation} \nonumber
F^{\rm M}(t) := \frac{1}{p}\sum_{j=1}^{p} \delta_{\alpha_j({\rm M})}(t), \quad t \in \mathbb{R},
\end{equation}
}
where and $\delta_{\alpha}(t)$ is a point mass function that can be also written, with notational abuse, as $\delta_{\alpha}(t) = I(\alpha \le t)$. Here, $I(A)$ denotes the indicator function of a set $A$.
\subsection{Limiting spectral distribution of sample covariance matrix}
Let $\{z_{ij}\}_{i,j\geq 1}$ be an infinite double array of independent and identically distributed
real-valued random variables with $Ez_{11}=0$, $Ez_{11}^2=1$ and $Ez_{11}^4=3$. Let ${\bf Z}_n = \{z_{ij}, i=1,2,\ldots,n, j=1,2,\ldots,p\}$ be
the top-left $n \times p$ block of the infinite double array. {We assume that
both $n$ and $p$ diverge and their ratio $\gamma':= p/n$ converges to a positive constant $\gamma$.} The
data matrix and the {uncentered sample covariance matrix} are ${\bf X}_n
= {\bf Z}_n\Sigma_p^{1/2}$ and ${\bf S}_n^0=\frac{1}{n}{\bf X}_n^{\top}{\bf X}_n$ respectively,
where $\{ \Sigma_p, p=1,2,\ldots \}$ is a sequence of $p \times p$ nonrandom symmetric matrices.
Note that the fourth moment condition $Ez_{11}^4=3$ is used later on in Proposition \ref{Prop1}.
In the random matrix theory literature \citep{Bai2004,Bai2009}, the limiting distribution of empirical SD
{$F^{{\rm\bf S}_n^0}(\cdot)$} is determined by both the limits of $p/n$ and
$F^{\Sigma_p}(\cdot)$. Specifically, if $H_p(\cdot) := F^{\Sigma_p}(\cdot)$ converges
in distribution to $H(\cdot)$, a random distribution function $F^{{\rm\bf S}_n^0}(\cdot)$ converges in distribution
to a nonrandom distribution function, say $F^{\gamma, H}(\cdot)$ with probability one. The definition of $F^{\gamma, H}(\cdot)$ is given by its Stieltjes transform
$m^{\gamma, H}(z)$ that is the unique solution of the following system of equations:
\begin{equation}\label{eqn:inv-stieltjes1}
m^{\gamma, H}(z)=\frac{1}{\gamma}\underline{m}^{\gamma, H}(z)+\frac{1-\gamma}{\gamma z} ; ~~
\end{equation}
\begin{equation}\label{eqn:inv-stieltjes}
z=-\frac{1}{\underline{m}^{\gamma, H}(z)}+\gamma \int \frac{t}{1+t\underline{m}^{\gamma, H}(z)}dH(t)
\end{equation}
on $z \in \{z : {\rm Im}(z)>0\}$.
Generally, $\underline{m}^{\gamma, H}(z)$ is known as the Stieltjes transform of
the limiting SD of the so-called companion matrix for ${\bf S}_n^0$, which is defined by {$\underline{\bf S}_n^0:= \frac{1}{n}{\bf X}_n{\bf X}_n^{\top}$}. The density of $F^{\gamma, H}$ can be calculated from $\underline{m}^{\gamma, H}$ by the inversion formula,
\begin{equation}\label{eqn:inv-stieltjes2}
\frac{dF^{\gamma, H}}{dx}(x)=\lim_{z\rightarrow x}~\frac{1}{\gamma\pi}~ {\rm Im}[\underline{m}^{\gamma, H}(z)], ~~x \in \mathbb{R}, ~~ z : {\rm Im}(z)>0.
\end{equation}
In the special case $\Sigma_p = {\rm I}_p$, we have $H_p(t) = \delta_1(t)$ and
the corresponding spectral distribution $F^{\gamma,\delta_1}$ follows the Mar\u cenko-Pastur law.
To see this, note that the second equation of (\ref{eqn:inv-stieltjes}) can be rewritten as
\begin{equation}\label{eqn:inv-MPstieltjes}
z= - \frac{1}{\underline{m}^{\gamma, \delta_1}(z)} + \frac{\gamma}{1+\underline{m}^{\gamma, \delta_1}(z)},
\end{equation}
when $H=\delta_1$. {By the inversion formula, (\ref{eqn:inv-stieltjes2}) yields} the probability density function of the Mar\u cenko-Pastur distribution indexed by $\gamma$ when $0 < \gamma < 1$,
\begin{equation}\label{eqn:pdfMPlaw}
\frac{dF^{\gamma, \delta_1}}{dx}(x) = \frac{1}{2 \pi \gamma x} \sqrt{ \big( b(\gamma)-
x) (x- a (\gamma))}, \quad a (\gamma) \le x \le b(\gamma),
\end{equation}
where $a(\gamma):= (1-\sqrt{\gamma})^2 $ and $b(\gamma):= (1+\sqrt{\gamma})^2$.
\subsection{Central limit theorem for linear spectral statistics}
Many multivariate statistical procedures are based on {$F^{{\rm\bf S}_n}$},
the empirical SD of {the centered sample
covariance matrix ${\rm\bf S}_n$.} Consider is a family of functionals of eigenvalues that is also
called as linear spectral statistics (LSS) or linear eigenvalue statistics:
{
\[
\frac{1}{p}\sum_{j=1}^{p}g(l_j) = \int g(x) d F^{{\bf S}_n}(x)
\]
}
where $g$ is a function fulfilling certain complex-analytic conditions.
{If the sample covariance matrix is uncentered, the central limit theorem (CLT) for the corresponding LSS is developed in \cite{Bai2004} and \cite{Bai2009}. The proposition below is adapted from Theorem 2.1 in \cite{Bai2009} and used in the asymptotic property of the proposed regularized LRT under the null.
Note that the centering term of the CLT
possesses a \emph{finite-dimensional proxy} $F^{\gamma', H_p}(\cdot)$.
\begin{proposition}[\cite{Bai2009}]\label{Prop1}
Let $T_n(g)$ be the functional
{
\begin{equation} \label{eqn:non-center}
T_n(g) = p \int g(x) \, d \! \left\{ \! F^{{\bf S}_n^0}(x) -F^{\gamma', H_p} (x) \! \right\}.
\end{equation}
}
Suppose that the two functions $g_{1}$ and $g_{2}\,,$ are complex analytic on an open domain containing an closed interval
$[ a(\gamma), b(\gamma) ]$ on the real axis. If $\gamma' = p/n \rightarrow \gamma \in (0, 1)$ and $H_p$ converges in distribution to $\delta_1$,
then the vector $(T_n(g_1),T_n(g_2))$ converges in distribution to a bivariate
normal distribution with mean
\begin{eqnarray}
\mu(g_{i}) &=& \frac{g_{i}(a(\gamma))+g_{i}(b(\gamma))}{4}-\frac{1}{2
\pi} \int_{a(\gamma)}^{b(\gamma)} \frac{g_{i}(x)}{\sqrt{4 \gamma
-(x-1- \gamma)^{2}}} dx \label{eqn:rmt_mean}
\end{eqnarray}
for $i=1,2,$ and variance
\begin{eqnarray}
v(g_{1},g_{2})=-\frac{1}{2\pi^{2}} \oint \oint
\frac{g_{1}(z_{1})g_{2}(z_{2})}{(\underline{m}(z_{1})-\underline{m}(z_{2}))^{2}}
d\underline{m}(z_{1}) d\underline{m}(z_{2}), \label{eqn:rmt_var}
\end{eqnarray}
where $\underline{m}=\underline{m}^{\gamma, \delta_1}$ is defined in
(\ref{eqn:inv-MPstieltjes}). The two contours in (\ref{eqn:rmt_var}) are non-overlapping and
containing $[a(\gamma), b(\gamma)]$, the support of $F^{\gamma, \delta_1}$.
\end{proposition}
{
The proposition requires the data to have known population mean vector (known as zero without loss
of generality) and considers
the non-centered sample covariance matrix ${\bf S}_n^0$. However, this is seldomly true in
practice and it is common to
use the ``unbiased'' and ``centered'' sample covariance matrix ${\bf X}_n ={\rm B}_n {\bf Z}_n\Sigma_p^{1/2}$
and ${\bf S}_n = ({1}/\tilde{n}) {\bf X}_n^{\top} {\bf X}_n$, where $\tilde{n}=n-1$ and ${\rm B}_n = {\rm I}_n - ({1}/{n}) {\rm J}_n$.
The extension of Proposition \ref{Prop1} to the centered sample covariance matrix is studied recently in \citet{Zheng2015}.
At the paper, the authors prove that, under the fourth moment assumptions (the assumption $Ez_{11}^4=3$ in Section 2.1), Proposition \ref{Prop1}
is still valid for ${\bf S}_n$ if $T_n(g)$ is redefined by
\begin{equation} \label{eqn:center}
T_n(g) = p \int g(x) \, d \! \left\{ \! F^{{\bf S}_n}(x) -F^{\tilde{\gamma}', H_p} (x) \! \right\},
\end{equation}
where $\tilde{n}=n-1$ is the adjusted sample size and $\tilde{\gamma}'=p \big/ \tilde{n}$. This is named as ``substitution principle''.
}
{The assumption $H=\delta_1$ roughly implies that the spectrum of $ \Sigma_p $ is eventually concentrated around one. One simple example is $\Sigma_p = {\rm I}_p$. Then the SD is $H_p = F^{{\rm I}_p}=\delta_1$, which trivially converges to $\delta_1$. In addition, we note that the spiked population model \citep{Johnstone2001} has $H=\delta_1$ as the limiting SD and is applicable to Proposition \ref{Prop1}. In our settings, the spiked population model refers to the data whose covariance matrix $\Sigma_p$ has the following eigenvalue structure:
\begin{eqnarray}
\underbrace{a_1, \ldots, a_1}_{n_1},
\underbrace{a_2, \ldots, a_2}_{n_2}, \ldots, \underbrace{a_k, \ldots, a_k}_{n_k}, \underbrace{1, \ldots, 1}_{p - K}. & \label{eqn:spikedeigval}
\end{eqnarray}}
Then the SD $H_p$ corresponding to $\Sigma_p$ is
{
\begin{equation}\label{eqn:SDspike}
H_p (t) = \frac{p - K}{p}\delta_1(t) + \frac{1}{p}\sum_{i=1}^{K}{n_i \delta_{a_i}(t)},
\end{equation}
}
where $K= n_1 + \ldots + n_k $ is a fixed finite integer, not depending on $n$ so that
{$p - K$} eigenvalues of unity eventually dominate corresponding $H_p$ when $p$ is large. Thus, the limiting
SD remains unchanged as $H=\delta_1$.
{To study the power of the proposed regularized LRT, it is useful to study how to apply the spiked population model to Proposition \ref{Prop1}.
Although the limiting SD is simple ($\delta_1$), the spiked population model has
several difficulties with the use of Proposition \ref{Prop1}.} In the spiked model, its SD,
$H_p$ in (\ref{eqn:SDspike}), has masses at $K+1$ distinct points and
$\underline{m}^{\tilde{\gamma}', H_p}(z)$ is the solution to a polynomial equation
of degree $K+2$. A polynomial equation has an analytical solution only when its degree
is less than or equal to 4. Therefore, if $K \geq 3$, we do not have an analytic
form of $\underline{m}^{\tilde{\gamma}', H_p}(z)$.
To resolve this difficulty, recently, \citet{Wang2013} provides an approximation formula of
$\int g dF^{\gamma', H_p}$ in Proposition \ref{Prop1} for the spiked population model. Such an approximation
of $g(\underline{m}^{\gamma', H_p})$ at $\underline{m}^{\gamma', \delta_1}$ is constructed based on the idea that $\underline{m}^{\gamma', H_p}(z)$ and $\underline{m}^{\gamma', \delta_1}(z)$ would be close enough if $p$ is large.
\begin{proposition}[\cite{Wang2013}]\label{Prop2}
Suppose that $\gamma' < 1$ and $H_p$ is given by (\ref{eqn:SDspike}),
with $|a_i - 1| > \sqrt{\gamma}$ for all $i=1,2,\ldots,K$. If a complex-valued function $g$ is analytic on an open domain containing the interval $[ a(\gamma), b(\gamma) ]$ and $k$ points $\varphi(a_i):= a_i + \frac{\gamma a_i}{a_i-1}$, $i=1,2,\ldots,K$ on the real axis, then $\int g(x) dF^{\gamma', H_p}(x)$ in (\ref{eqn:non-center}) can be approximated by
\begin{eqnarray}
&& \int g(x) dF^{\gamma', H_p}(x) \nonumber \\
&& \hspace*{-1cm} = \, - \frac{1}{2 \pi i p} \oint_{\mathcal{C}} g(-\frac{1}{\underline{m}}+\frac{\gamma'}{1+\underline{m}})
\left( \frac{K}{\gamma' \underline{m}} - \sum_{i=1}^{K} \frac{n_i a_i^2 \underline{m}}{(1 + a_i \underline{m})^2} \right) d\underline{m} \label{eqn:spiketerm1} \\
&& \hspace*{-1cm} + \frac{1}{2 \pi i p} \oint_{\mathcal{C}} f'(-\frac{1}{\underline{m}}+\frac{\gamma'}{1+\underline{m}})
\sum_{i=1}^{K} \frac{(1-a_i)n_i}{(1+a_i \underline{m})(1+\underline{m})} \! \left( \frac{1}{\underline{m}} -\frac{\gamma' \underline{m}}{(1+\underline{m})^2} \! \right) d\underline{m} \label{eqn:spiketerm2} \\
&& \hspace*{-1cm} +\left(1 - \frac{K}{p}\right) \int g(x) d F^{\gamma', \delta_1}(x)+
\frac{1}{p}\sum_{i=1}^{K} n_i g(\varphi(a_i)) + O( \frac{1}{n^2} )\label{eqn:spiketerm3}
\end{eqnarray}
where $\underline{m}=\underline{m}^{\gamma', \delta_1}$ is defined in (\ref{eqn:inv-MPstieltjes}) by substituting $\gamma$ by $\gamma'$, and $\mathcal{C}$ is a counterclockwise contour enclosing the interval $\left[\frac{-1}{1-\sqrt{\gamma'}}, \frac{-1}{1+\sqrt{\gamma'}} \right]$ on the real axis.
\end{proposition}
The above proposition is a special case of Theorem 2 in \citet{Wang2013} when all the $a_i$'s are \emph{distant spikes}, i.e., $|a_i -1| > \sqrt{\gamma}$. Note that Theorem 2 of \cite{Wang2013} allows \emph{close spikes} $a_i$ that is defined by $|a_i - 1| \leq \sqrt{\gamma}$.
{In this paper, we focus on the alternative hypothesis with distant spike in the power study.}
{We finally remark that the substitution principle is directly applicable to Wang et al.'s results, that is, one can approximate $\int g(x) dF^{\tilde{\gamma}', H_p}(x)$ in (\ref{eqn:center}) by Proposition \ref{Prop2}, with $\gamma' = p/n$ in the formula replaced by $\tilde{\gamma}' = p/(n-1)$.}
\section{Main results}\label{MainRes}
In this section, the asymptotic results of the rLRT are presented. Here,
the rLRT is defined via the linear shrinkage estimator instead of the sample covariance matrix :
\begin{equation} \nonumber
{\rm rLRT} (\lambda) := \mathrm{tr} \big( \widehat{\Sigma} \big) -
\log \big| \widehat{\Sigma} \big| -p,
~~\mbox{where}~ \widehat{\Sigma} := \lambda {\bf S}_n + (1- \lambda) {\rm I}_p.
\end{equation}
{The shrinkage intensity $\lambda$ is fixed and chosen from $(0,1)$. Define
$\psi(x)= \lambda x + (1-\lambda)$ and $g(x) = \psi(x) - \log\{ \psi(x)\} -1$.
We consider ${\rm rLRT}(\lambda) = p \int g(x) dF^{{\bf S}_n}(x)$, whose sample covariance matrix term is of the centered version. Then Proposition \ref{Prop1} along with the substitution principle
yields the following results.}
\begin{theorem} \label{Thm1}
Let $g(x) = \psi(x) - \log\{ \psi(x)\} -1$ and $\psi(x)= \lambda x + (1-\lambda)$ with fixed $\lambda \in (0,1)$. Suppose that $\Sigma_p={\rm I}_{p}$. If {$\tilde{\gamma}'= p\big/\tilde{n}\rightarrow \gamma \in (0,1)$ with $\tilde{n}=n-1$, then
\begin{equation} \nonumber
T_n(g) = {\rm rLRT}(\lambda) -p \int g(x)d F^{\tilde{\gamma}', \delta_1} (x)
\end{equation}
}converges in distribution to the normal distribution with mean
\begin{equation}
\mu(g) = -\frac{\log\sqrt{(1+\lambda\gamma)^2-4\lambda^2\gamma}}{2}+\frac{1}{4\pi}\int^{2\pi}_{0} \left( \log(1+\lambda\gamma-2\lambda\sqrt{\gamma}\cos\theta) \right)d\theta \label{eqn:a_mean}
\end{equation}
and variance
\begin{equation}
v(g) = 2\left\{ -\frac{\lambda}{M}-\lambda(1+\gamma-\lambda\gamma)+\frac{\lambda\gamma}{1+N}-\log\frac{M-N}{M(1+N)} \right\}, \label{eqn:a_var}
\end{equation}
where
\begin{equation}\label{MN}
M,N= M(\lambda, \gamma), N(\lambda, \gamma):= \frac{-(1-2\lambda+\lambda\gamma)\pm\sqrt{(1-2\lambda+\lambda\gamma)^2+4\lambda(1-\lambda)}}{2(1-\lambda)}
\end{equation}
\end{theorem}
\noindent The detailed proof of Theorem \ref{Thm1} is given in Appendix \ref{Pf}.
{Note that when $\lambda=1$, $\mu(g)=-\log(1-\gamma)/2$ and $v(g)=-2\gamma-2\log(1-\gamma)$ that are consistent with the results in \cite{Bai2009}. To see this, observe that the integral in the mean function
$
\int^{2\pi}_{0} \log \big(1+\lambda\gamma-2\lambda\sqrt{\gamma}\cos\theta \big) d\theta
$
approaches zero according to the dominate convergence theorem.} In addition, it can be shown that $M$ goes to $-1/(1-\gamma)$, and $N$ goes to $+\infty$ as $\lambda\rightarrow 1$ using
the approximation formula $\sqrt{x+\Delta x}\approx \sqrt{x}+\frac{1}{2}x^{-1/2} \Delta x$.
{
Next, consider the finite-dimensional proxy
\begin{equation} \nonumber
\int g(x)dF^{\tilde{\gamma}', \delta_1}(x).
\end{equation}
}
From the density function of Mar\u{c}enko-Pastur law (\ref{eqn:pdfMPlaw}) and the fact that $1 = \int x dF^{\tilde{\gamma}', \delta_1}(x) = \int 1 dF^{\tilde{\gamma}', \delta_1}(x)$,
\begin{eqnarray*}
&& \int g(x)dF^{\tilde{\gamma}', \delta_1}(x) \\
&=& \int_{a(\tilde{\gamma}')}^{b(\tilde{\gamma}')} \frac{(\lambda x-\lambda)-\log(\lambda x+1-\lambda)}{2\pi x\tilde{\gamma}'} \sqrt{\{b(\tilde{\gamma}')-x \} \{x-a(\tilde{\gamma}') \}}dx \\
&=& - \int_{a(\tilde{\gamma}')}^{b(\tilde{\gamma}')} \frac{\log(\lambda x+1-\lambda)}{2\pi x\tilde{\gamma}'} \sqrt{\{b(\tilde{\gamma}')-x \} \{x-a(\tilde{\gamma}') \}}dx.
\end{eqnarray*}
By substituting $x=1+\tilde{\gamma}'-2\sqrt{\tilde{\gamma}'}\cos\theta$,
we have an alternative representation of the integral
\begin{equation}\label{Thm1Impl}
\int g(x)dF^{\tilde{\gamma}', \delta_1}(x)= -
\frac{2}{\pi }\int^{\pi}_0 \frac{\log(1+\lambda\tilde{\gamma}'-2\lambda\sqrt{\tilde{\gamma}'}\cos\theta)}{1+\tilde{\gamma}'-2\sqrt{\tilde{\gamma}'}\cos\theta} \cdot \sin^2\theta d\theta.
\end{equation}
It is remarked that the right-hand-side of (\ref{Thm1Impl}) can be evaluated via the standard numerical integration techniques.
Theorem \ref{Thm2} below establishes the asymptotic normality of the rLRT under the alternative hypothesis that the true covariance matrix from the spiked population model in Section \ref{RMT}. It follows directly from Proposition \ref{Prop2}.
\begin{theorem} \label{Thm2}
Let $g(x) = \psi(x) - \log\{ \psi(x)\} -1$ and $\psi(x)= \lambda x + (1-\lambda)$ with fixed $\lambda \in (0,1)$. Suppose that $\Sigma_p$ has SD {$H_p (t) = \frac{p - K}{p}\delta_1(t) + \frac{1}{p}\sum_{i=1}^{K}{n_i \delta_{a_i}(t)}$} as in (\ref{eqn:SDspike}) with $|a_i - 1| > \sqrt{\gamma}$ for all $i=1,2,\ldots,K$.
If {$\tilde{\gamma}'= p/\tilde{n} \rightarrow \gamma \in (0,1)$ with $\tilde{n}=n-1$}, then
\begin{equation} \nonumber
{\rm rLRT(\lambda)} - p \int g(x) dF^{\tilde{\gamma}', H_p}(x) \longrightarrow N \big( \mu(g), v(g) \big),
\end{equation}
where $\mu(g),v(g)$ are defined in Theorem \ref{Thm1} and
\begin{equation} \nonumber
{p \int g(x) dF^{\tilde{\gamma}', H_p}(x)}
= \left( 1 - \frac{K}{p} \right) {\int g(x) dF^{\tilde{\gamma}', \delta_1}(x)} + \frac{K}{p}{C (\lambda, \tilde{\gamma}')} + O\left(\frac{1}{n^2}\right)
\end{equation}
with
\begin{eqnarray*}
{C (\lambda, \tilde{\gamma}')} &=& \lambda \cdot \frac{1}{K} \sum_{i=1}^{K} n_i a_i - \lambda - \frac{1}{K}\sum_{i=1}^{K} n_i \log \psi \{ \varphi(a_i) \} \\
&& \hspace*{-1.2cm} - \Bigg[ \frac{1}{ {\tilde{\gamma}'} } \log(-M) + \frac{1}{K}\sum_{i=1}^{K}n_i \log \Big( \frac{1-a_i}{1 + a_i M} \Big)
- \frac{1}{K} \sum_{i=1}^{K} n_i \Big( \frac{1}{1 + a_i M} - \frac{1}{1 - a_i} \Big) \Bigg] \\
&& \hspace*{-1.2cm} + \frac{\lambda}{(1 - \lambda)K} \sum_{i=1}^{K} n_i \Bigg[ \frac{1}{M-N} \Bigg\{ \frac{a_i (M+1)}{1+ a_i M} -\frac{a_i {\tilde{\gamma}'} M^2}{(1 + a_i M)(M+1)} - 1 + \frac{{\tilde{\gamma}'} M^2}{(M+1)^2} \Bigg\}
\\
&& \hspace*{-1.2cm}~~~~~~~~~~~~~\qquad\qquad - \frac{1}{(M+1)(N+1)} \Bigg\{ \frac{a_i {\tilde{\gamma}'}}{1 - a_i} + \frac{{\tilde{\gamma}'} (2MN + M + N)}{(M+1)(N+1)} \Bigg\} \Bigg],
\end{eqnarray*}
where $\varphi(a)= a + \frac{\gamma a}{a-1}$ and both $M$ and $N$ in $C (\lambda, \tilde{\gamma}')$ are $M = M(\lambda, \tilde{\gamma}')$ and $N = N(\lambda, \tilde{\gamma}')$.
\end{theorem}
\noindent The proof of the above theorem is provided in Appendix \ref{Pf}.
{Theorem \ref{Thm2} can be applied to {$\Sigma_{{\rm cs}}$}, the covariance matrix with compound symmetry, which is defined by}
\begin{equation}\label{cpsymm}
\Sigma_{{\rm cs}} \left( \frac{\beta}{p} \right) = \left(\begin{array}{ccccc}1 + \beta/p &\beta/p&\beta/p&\cdots&\beta/p\\
\beta/p&1+\beta/p&&&\\
\vdots&&\ddots&&\vdots\\
\vdots&&&\ddots&\vdots\\
\beta/p&\cdots&\cdots&\cdots&1+ \beta/p
\end{array}\right) = {\rm I}_{p} + \frac{\beta}{p} {\rm J}_p.
\end{equation}
This matrix has a spiked eigenvalue structure; $1 + \beta$ for one eigenvalue and $1$ for the other $p-1$ eigenvalues. The corresponding SD is $H_p(t)=\frac{p -1}{p} \delta_1(t) + \frac{1}{p}\delta_{1+\beta}(t)$. Theorem \ref{Thm2} with $K=1$, $k=1$, $n_1=1$, and $a_1 = 1 + \beta$ gives the following corollary.
\begin{corol} \label{Cor1}
Let $g(x) = \psi(x) - \log\{ \psi(x)\} -1$ and $\psi(x)= \lambda x + (1-\lambda)$ with fixed $\lambda \in (0,1)$. Suppose that $\Sigma_p$ has SD $H_p(t)=\frac{p -1}{p} \delta_1(t) + \frac{1}{p}\delta_{1+\beta}(t)$ with $\beta > \sqrt{\gamma}$. If {$\tilde{\gamma}' := p/\tilde{n} \rightarrow \gamma \in (0,1)$ where $\tilde{n}=n-1$}, then
\begin{equation} \nonumber
{\rm rLRT(\lambda)} - {p \int g(x) dF^{\tilde{\gamma}', H_p}(x)} \longrightarrow N( \mu(g), v(g)),
\end{equation}
where $\mu(g),v(g)$ are defined in Theorem \ref{Thm1} and
\begin{equation}\nonumber
{ \int g(x) dF^{\tilde{\gamma}', H_p}(x) }
= \left(1 - \frac{1}{p}\right) { \int g(x) dF^{\tilde{\gamma}', \delta_1}(x) } + \frac{1}{p} {C (\lambda, \tilde{\gamma}') } + O\left(\frac{1}{n^2} \right)
\end{equation}
with
\begin{eqnarray*}
{C (\lambda, \tilde{\gamma}')} &=& \lambda\beta - \log \psi \{ \varphi(1+\beta) \} + \frac{1}{ { \tilde{\gamma}'} } \left\{ \frac{1}{\lambda} + \log(-\frac{1}{M}) \right\} \\
&& \hspace*{-1.2cm} + \frac{1}{1 + (1+\beta) M} - \log \Big( -\frac{\beta}{1 + (1+\beta)M} \Big) \\
&& \hspace*{-1.2cm} + \frac{\lambda}{(1 - \lambda)(M-N)} \! \Bigg\{ \! \frac{(1+\beta) (M+1)}{1+ (1+\beta) M} \! - \! \frac{ {\tilde{\gamma}'} (1+\beta) M^2}{(1 + (1+\beta) M)(M+1)} \! - \! 1\! +\! \frac{{\tilde{\gamma}'} M^2}{(M+1)^2}\! \Bigg\},
\end{eqnarray*}
where $\varphi(a)= a + \frac{\gamma a}{a-1}$ and both $M$ and $N$ in $C (\lambda, \tilde{\gamma}')$ are $M = M(\lambda, \tilde{\gamma}')$ and $N = N(\lambda, \tilde{\gamma}')$.
\end{corol}
\noindent In the corollary, the condition $\beta > \sqrt{\gamma}$ means that the spiked eigenvalue
$1 + \beta$ is distant.
\section{Testing the identity covariance matrix}\label{Num}
The results in Section \ref{MainRes} can be used for testing various hypotheses on one
sample covariance matrix. In this section, we study the finite-sample properties of the proposed rLRT in testing $\mathcal{H}_0:
\Sigma={\rm I}_p$. Additionally, we compare the power of the proposed rLRT and the following existing procedures in the literature.
\begin{itemize}
\item \cite{Ledoit2002} assume that $p\big/n \rightarrow \gamma \in (0, \infty)$ and propose a statistic
\begin{equation} \nonumber
{\bf T}_{\rm LW} = \frac{1}{p} {\rm tr} \left\{ \big( {\bf S} - {\rm I} \big)^2 \right\}
-\frac{p}{n} \left\{ \frac{1}{p} {\rm tr} \big( {\bf S} \big) \right\}^2 + \frac{p}{n}.
\end{equation}
The asymptotic distribution of ${\bf T}_{\rm LW}$ is, if both
$n$ and $p$ increase with $p/n \rightarrow \gamma \in (0, \infty)$,
\begin{equation} \nonumber
n {\bf T}_{\rm LW} - p
\end{equation}
converges in distribution to normal distribution with mean $1$ and variance $4$.
\item {\cite{Bai2009} and \citet{Zheng2015} propose a corrected LRT for the cases where both $n$ and $p$ increases and $p\big/n$ converges to $\gamma \in (0,1)$. The corrected LRT statistic is
\begin{equation} \nonumber
{\rm cLRT} = \mathrm{tr} \big({\rm \bf S}_n\big) - \log \big| {\rm\bf S}_n \big| -p.
\end{equation}
They show that
\begin{equation} \nonumber
{\bf T}_{\rm lrt} = v(g)^{-1/2} \bigg\{ {\rm cLRT} - p \int g(x) dF^{\tilde{\gamma}', \delta_1}(x)dx -\mu (g) \bigg\}
\end{equation}
converges in distribution to the standard normal distribution, where $\mu(g) = - \frac{\log (1- \gamma)}{2}$, $v(g) = - 2 \log(1-\gamma) - 2\gamma$, and $\int g(x) dF^{\tilde{\gamma}', \delta_1}(x)dx = 1 - \frac{\tilde{\gamma}'-1}{\tilde{\gamma}'} \log \big(1-\tilde{\gamma}' \big)$.
}
\item Finally, \cite{Chen2010} proposes to use the statistic
\begin{equation} \nonumber
{\bf T}_{\rm C} = \frac{1}{p} {\bf V}_{2.n} - \frac{2}{p} {\bf V}_{1.n} +1,
\end{equation}
where
\begin{eqnarray}
{\bf V}_{1.n}&=& \frac{1}{n} \sum_{i=1}^n X_i^{\top} X_i - \frac{1}{P_n^2} \sum_{i \neq j} X_i^{\top} X_j \nonumber\\
{\bf V}_{2.n} &=& \frac{1}{ P_n^2} \sum_{i \neq j} \big( X_i^{\top} X_j \big)^2 -
2 \frac{1}{P_n^3} \sum_{i,j,k}^* X_i^{\top} X_j X_j^{\top} X_k \nonumber \\
&& + \frac{1}{P_n^4} \sum_{i,j,k,l}^* X_i^{\top} X_j X_k^{\top} X_l \nonumber\\
P_n^r &=& n!/(n-r)! \nonumber
\end{eqnarray}
and $\sum^*$ is the summation over different indices.
The asymptotic theory suggests that, under the null, $n {\bf T}_{\rm C}$
converges in distribution to the normal distribution with mean $0$ and variance $4$.
\end{itemize}
\iffalse
We remark that the sample covariance matrix is differently defined for different methods. The cLRT and rLRT are based on ${\bf S}=\frac{1}{n} \sum_{i}{ {X}_i {X}_i^{\top}} $, while
${\bf S}_{\rm cen}=\frac{1}{n-1}\sum_{i}{ ({X}_i-\overline{X})( {X}_i - \overline{X})^{\top}} $ is used for \citet{Ledoit2002} and
\citet{Chen2010}. Thus, in our simulation study in the following section,
the rLRT and the cLRT are based on the sample covariance without centering term,
${\bf S}=\frac{1}{n} \sum_{i}{{X}_i {X}_i^{\top}}$, and those of \citet{Ledoit2002} and \citet{Chen2010} are based on the sample covariance with centering term,
${\bf S}_{\rm cen}=\frac{1}{n-1}\sum_{i}{ ({X}_i-\overline{X})( {X}_i - \overline{X})^{\top}}$.
The use of ${\bf S}_{\rm cen}=\frac{1}{n-1}\sum_{i}{ ({X}_i-\overline{X})( {X}_i - \overline{X})^{\top}} $
in the cLRT and the rLRT will have different asymptotic results whose details are discussed in Section \ref{Disc}.
\fi
\subsection{Power comparison with the cLRT}\label{Num1}
The asymptotic power curves of the cLRT and rLRT
for the alternative hypothesis of the compound
symmetry can be obtained using Corollary \ref{Cor1}. When $\Sigma_p \equiv \Sigma_{\rm cs} (\beta/p)$ and $\tilde{\gamma}' \rightarrow \gamma$, the probability of rejecting $\mathcal{H}_0 : \Sigma_p= {\rm I}_p$ at level $\eta$ is
\begin{equation}\label{eqn:CSpower}
1 - \Phi\left[ \Phi^{-1}(\eta) +{\frac{1}{v(g)}\left( \int g(x) dF^{\tilde{\gamma}', \delta_1}(x) - C (\lambda, \tilde{\gamma}') \right)} \right], ~~\beta > \sqrt{\gamma}
\end{equation}
where ${C (\lambda, \tilde{\gamma}')}$ is defined in Corollary \ref{Cor1} and $\Phi(\cdot)$ denotes the cumulative distribution function of the standard normal distribution.
The powers of the cLRT and rLRT with $\lambda=0.4$ and $\lambda=0.7$ are plotted in Figure \ref{fig:powerCS}. Each panel of Figure \ref{fig:powerCS} compares the powers of the cLRT and rLRT
for different sample size $n$. In each panel, the results of $\beta<\sqrt{\gamma}$ (close spike) are also included to study the performances when the the assumption of distant spike in Corollary \ref{Cor1} is violated. The results
in Figure \ref{fig:powerCS} suggest that Theorem \ref{Thm2} would be applicable
when there is a ``close spike'' eigenvalue. More detailed discussions are given in
Section \ref{Disc}.
We find that in all cases the rLRT has higher empirical power than the cLRT for
the chosen values of $\lambda=0.4$ and $0.7$. We also find that the empirical power curve increases
to 1 less rapidly if $\lambda$ or $\gamma$ is closer to 1. In addition, although we do not report
the details, the empirical curves converge fast and do have
minor changes after $n=80$ for the selected values of $\lambda$
and $\gamma$.
\begin{figure}[ht!]
\centering
\begin{minipage}{.45\textwidth}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=1.0\linewidth]{pwcurve1_151204.pdf}
\end{minipage}%
\begin{minipage}{.45\textwidth}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=1.0\linewidth]{pwcurve2_151204.pdf}
\end{minipage}
\begin{minipage}{.45\textwidth}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=1.0\linewidth]{pwcurve3_151204.pdf}
\end{minipage}%
\begin{minipage}{.45\textwidth}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=1.0\linewidth]{pwcurve4_151204.pdf}
\end{minipage}
\caption{Analytic and empirical power curves for the rLRT and cLRT.}
\label{fig:powerCS}
\end{figure}
To understand the power gain due to the use of the rLRT better, we plot the empirical
density of the rLRT and cLRT under {the null and four alternative
hypotheses (A1)-(A4) (used in Section 4.2) in Figure \ref{fig:empipdf}. }
The figure shows that (i) the variances
of the rLRT are smaller than the cLRT under both null and alternative hypotheses
and (ii) the distances between the null and the alternative distributions
are larger in the rLRT than in the cLRT.
Accordingly, the rLRT has larger power than the cLRT and we will see
this is true regardless of the choice of $n$ and $p$ in the next section.
\begin{figure}[htb!]
\centering
\begin{minipage}{.45\textwidth}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=1.0\linewidth]{TestStatsEmpDist_160101_cLRT.pdf}
\end{minipage}%
\begin{minipage}{.45\textwidth}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=1.0\linewidth]{TestStatsEmpDist_160101_rLRT.pdf}
\end{minipage}%
\caption{{Empirical density functions of the rLRT and the
cLRT under the null and four alternative hypotheses when $n=40$, $p=32$, and $\lambda=0.5$: (A1) independent but
heteroscedastic variance case $\Sigma = \mathrm{diag}(2, 2, \cdots , 2, 1, 1, \cdots, 1)$ where the number
of $2$'s is $\min \{1, \lfloor 0.2p \rfloor \}$, where $\lfloor r \rfloor$ is the round-down of $r$; (A2) independent with a single diverging spiked eigenvalue
as $\Sigma=\mathrm{diag}(1+0.2p, 1,1,\cdots, 1)$; (A3) compound symmetry $\Sigma = \Sigma_{\rm cs}(0.2)$; and (A4)
compound symmetry $\Sigma = \Sigma_{\rm cs}(0.1)$ as defined in (\ref{cpsymm}).}}
\label{fig:empipdf}
\end{figure}
\subsection{Power comparison with other existing procedures}\label{Num2}
In this section, we numerically compare the empirical sizes and powers of the rLRT statistic to other existing tests, namely the corrected LRT (cLRT) by \cite{Bai2009}, the invariant test by \cite{Ledoit2002}, and the non-parametric
test by \cite{Chen2010}.
In this study, {random samples of size $n$ are generated from the $p-$dimensional multivariate normal distribution ${\rm MVN}_p(0, \Sigma)$. The covariance matrix is set as $\Sigma = {\rm I}_p$ to obtain the empirical sizes.
The sample size $n$ is chosen as $20, 40, 80$, and $160$, and, for each $n$, $\gamma = \gamma' = p/n$ is
chosen as $0.2, 0.5$, and $0.8$.} For example, $p = 32, 80$, and $128$ are considered for $n=160$ in the simulation. We take $0.05$ as as the level of significance.
The shrinkage intensity $\lambda$ of ${\rm rLRT}(\lambda)$ is selected from $0.2, 0.5$, and
$0.8$ to investigate the effect of the magnitude of the linear shrinkage. This means that we
compare the empirical sizes of cLRT, rLRT(0.2), rLRT(0.5), and rLRT(0.8) under varying $n$
and $\gamma$.
To compare the powers, we consider the following four alternatives: (A1) independent but
heteroscedastic variance case $\Sigma = \mathrm{diag}(2, 2, \cdots , 2, 1, 1, \cdots, 1)$ where the number
of $2$'s is $\min \{1, \lfloor 0.2p \rfloor \}$, where $\lfloor r \rfloor$ is the round-down of $r$; (A2) independent with a single diverging spiked eigenvalue
as $\Sigma=\mathrm{diag}(1+0.2p, 1,1,\cdots, 1)$; (A3) compound symmetry $\Sigma = \Sigma_{\rm cs}(0.2)$; and (A4)
compound symmetry $\Sigma = \Sigma_{\rm cs}(0.1)$ as defined in (\ref{cpsymm}). Here, the compound symmetry matrix
$\Sigma_{\rm cs}(\rho)$ has a single spiked eigenvalue $1+\rho \cdot p$ and $p-1$ non-spiked eigenvalues of $1$. Thus, (A2) and (A3) have the identical spectra.
The sample size $n$ and $\gamma$ are chosen to be the same as those of the null.
The empirical sizes and powers of the listed methods are reported in Table \ref{table:sizepower}. First, the empirical sizes of all the tests approach to the aimed level $0.05$ as $n$ increases. However, the size of \cite{Ledoit2002} shows slower convergence and more upward bias than the size of the other tests do in all cases we considered here. {For this reason, the power of \cite{Ledoit2002} after correcting the size (empirically) are also reported in Table \ref{table:sizepower}, where the cut off value is decided based on $100,000$ simulated test statistics under the null for each simulation setting.}
Second, it can be seen that the emprical powers of the rLRTs are higher than those of the cLRT in all cases we considered. In addition, it is interesting to note that the power improvement is especially higher in the case $\gamma=0.8$ (when $p$ is relatively largfe).
Third, comparing to the tests of \citet{Chen2010} and (the biased-corrected version of) \citet{Ledoit2002}, the proposed rLRT(0.5) and rLRT(0.2) has higher empirical power in most of the cases.
Finally, we remark that the computational cost of \citet{Chen2010} is at least $O(pn^4)$ due to the fourth moment calculation so it is not suitable for data with large $n$. In fact, to test the data with $n=500$, \citet{Chen2010} takes tens of hours to finish all computation (using \texttt{C} codes and Intel Core-i7 CPU), whereas the other tests only require seconds.
\begin{table}[hp]
\centering
\bigskip
{\scriptsize
\begin{tabular}[c]{c|c|c|cccc|cc}
\hline
& $\gamma$ & $n$ & cLRT &
$\begin{array}{c}\mbox{rLRT}\\ \mbox{(0.8)}\end{array}$ &
$\begin{array}{c}\mbox{rLRT}\\ \mbox{(0.5)}\end{array}$ &
$\begin{array}{c}\mbox{rLRT}\\ \mbox{(0.2)}\end{array}$ &
Chen & LW \\
\hline
& & 20 & 0.085 & 0.078 & 0.078 & 0.083 & 0.087 & 0.089 \\
& 0.2 & 40 & 0.069 & 0.066 & 0.068 & 0.073 & 0.074 & 0.083 \\
& & 80 & 0.062 & 0.059 & 0.061 & 0.064 & 0.070 & 0.076 \\
\cline{2-9}
& & 20 & 0.068 & 0.059 & 0.065 & 0.072 & 0.068 & 0.104 \\
Null & 0.5 & 40 & 0.061 & 0.055 & 0.059 & 0.064 & 0.075 & 0.098 \\
& & 80 & 0.056 & 0.053 & 0.056 & 0.060 & 0.068 & 0.091 \\
\cline{2-9}
& & 20 & 0.065 & 0.055 & 0.063 & 0.068 & 0.068 & 0.125 \\
& 0.8 & 40 & 0.058 & 0.052 & 0.056 & 0.059 & 0.058 & 0.120 \\
& & 80 & 0.055 & 0.051 & 0.054 & 0.056 & 0.064 & 0.113 \\
\hline
& & 20 & 0.370 & 0.444 & 0.511 & \underline{\bf 0.550} & 0.459 & 0.517 (0.440) \\
& 0.2 & 40 & 0.394 & 0.489 & 0.579 & \underline{\bf 0.632} & 0.540 & 0.596 (0.527) \\
A1: & & 80 & 0.951 & 0.984 & 0.996 & \underline{\bf 0.998} & 0.989 & 0.991 (0.987) \\
\cline{2-9}
Indep. & & 20 & 0.265 & 0.478 & 0.604 & \underline{\bf 0.653} & 0.478 & 0.574 (0.471) \\
with & 0.5 & 40 & 0.569 & 0.880 & 0.961 & \underline{\bf 0.977} & 0.851 & 0.897 (0.849) \\
hetero. & & 80 & 0.967 & 1.000 & 1.000 & 1.000 & 1.000 & 1.000 (0.999) \\
\cline{2-9}
variance & & 20 & 0.180 & 0.580 & 0.703 & \underline{\bf 0.741} & 0.459 & 0.629 (0.492) \\
& 0.8 & 40 & 0.392 & 0.959 & 0.991 & \underline{\bf 0.995} & 0.854 & 0.924 (0.868) \\
& & 80 & 0.859 & 1.000 & 1.000 & 1.000 & 0.999 & 1.000 (0.999) \\
\hline
& & 20 & 0.280 & 0.341 & 0.403 & \underline{\bf 0.440} & 0.351 & 0.408 (0.331) \\
A2: & 0.2 & 40 & 0.724 & 0.810 & 0.871 & \underline{\bf 0.899} & 0.853 & 0.882 (0.848) \\
Indep. & & 80 & 0.999 & 1.000 & 1.000 & 1.000 & 1.000 & 1.000 (1.000) \\
\cline{2-9}
with & & 20 & 0.385 & 0.596 & 0.698 & \underline{\bf 0.739} & 0.664 & 0.729 (0.650) \\
single & 0.5 & 40 & 0.890 & 0.979 & 0.993 & \underline{\bf 0.996} & 0.989 & 0.996 (0.994) \\
diversing & & 80 & 1.000 & 1.000 & 1.000 & 1.000 & 1.000 & 1.000 (1.000) \\
\cline{2-9}
spike & & 20 & 0.349 & 0.765 & 0.838 & \underline{\bf 0.864} & 0.795 & 0.879 (0.816) \\
$1+0.2p$ & 0.8 & 40 & 0.867 & 0.997 & 0.999 & \underline{\bf 1.000} & 0.999 & 1.000 (0.999) \\
& & 80 & 1.000 & 1.000 & 1.000 & 1.000 & 1.000 & 1.000 (1.000) \\
\hline
& & 20 & 0.280 & 0.343 & 0.404 & \underline{\bf 0.440} & 0.382 & 0.410 (0.333) \\
& 0.2 & 40 & 0.726 & 0.810 & 0.870 & \underline{\bf 0.900} & 0.835 & 0.882 (0.848) \\
A3: & & 80 & 0.999 & 1.000 & 1.000 & 1.000 & 1.000 & 1.000 (1.000) \\
\cline{2-9}
Compound & & 20 & 0.387 & 0.595 & 0.695 & \underline{\bf 0.736} & 0.669 & 0.727 (0.649) \\
symmetry & 0.5 & 40 & 0.888 & 0.979 & 0.992 & \underline{\bf 0.996} & 0.995 & 0.996 (0.993) \\
with & & 80 & 1.000 & 1.000 & 1.000 & 1.000 & 1.000 & 1.000 (1.000) \\
\cline{2-9}
$\rho=0.2$ & & 20 & 0.351 & 0.764 & 0.837 & \underline{\bf 0.862} & 0.796 & 0.877 (0.816) \\
& 0.8 & 40 & 0.865 & 0.997 & 0.999 & 1.000 & 0.999 & 1.000 (0.999) \\
& & 80 & 1.000 & 1.000 & 1.000 & 1.000 & 1.000 & 1.000 (1.000) \\
\hline
& & 20 & 0.137 & 0.162 & 0.195 & \underline{\bf 0.217} & 0.187 & 0.201 (0.140) \\
& 0.2 & 40 & 0.280 & 0.358 & 0.441 & \underline{\bf 0.491} & 0.400 & 0.454 (0.380) \\
A4: & & 80 & 0.796 & 0.885 & 0.939 & \underline{\bf 0.962} & 0.948 & 0.953 (0.940) \\
\cline{2-9}
Compound & & 20 & 0.153 & 0.252 & 0.330 & \underline{\bf 0.368} & 0.292 & 0.365 (0.266) \\
symmetry & 0.5 & 40 & 0.405 & 0.659 & 0.782 & \underline{\bf 0.830} & 0.772 & 0.828 (0.767) \\
with & & 80 & 0.939 & 0.996 & 0.999 & 1.000 & 1.000 & 1.000 (1.000) \\
\cline{2-9}
$\rho=0.1$ & & 20 & 0.139 & 0.363 & 0.452 & \underline{\bf 0.490} & 0.403 & 0.526 (0.392) \\
& 0.8 & 40 & 0.376 & 0.838 & 0.911 & \underline{\bf 0.936} & 0.912 & 0.952 (0.920) \\
& & 80 & 0.915 & 1.000 & 1.000 & 1.000 & 1.000 & 1.000 (1.000) \\
\hline
\end{tabular}
}
\bigskip
\caption{Summary of sizes and powers over 100,000 replications except for \citet{Chen2010} and 1,000 replications for \citet{Chen2010} (due to heavy computation). The empirically corrected powers of \citet{Ledoit2002}
are reported in the parentheses. {For each row, the maximum powers are highlighted in bold and the maximum powers among the four LRT-based tests are underlined. The powers for $n=160$ are all equal to $1$ and are removed from the table.}}
\label{table:sizepower}
\end{table}
\section{Discussion}\label{Disc}
We conclude the paper with a few additional issues of the proposed rLRT not fully discussed in the mainbody of the paper.
First, we consider the case where $n < p$; equivalently, $\gamma \geq 1$. In
this case, the cLRT is not well-defined because the logarithm term, $\log |{\bf S}_n| =
\sum_i \log (l_i)$, contains some zero $l_i$'s.
On the other hand, the rLRT is still well-defined as the corresponding logartithm term $\sum_i \log \psi (l_i)$ remains positive even if $\lambda < 1$. Since the CLT of the
linear spectral statistics holds for $\gamma \in [0, \infty)$ \citep{Bai2004}, it is possible to extend Theorem \ref{Thm1} and \ref{Thm2} in this paper to the case where $\gamma \in [1, \infty)$.
Second, we discuss the case with closely spiked eigenvalues. In the compound symmetry model of (\ref{cpsymm}), the close spiked eigenvalues are those where the spike $1 + \beta$ is smaller than $1+\sqrt{\gamma}$. As shown in Figure \ref{fig:powerCS}, it appears that the power curves over the interval $\beta \in (0, \sqrt{\gamma})$ could be obtained simply by extending the
formula of Corollary 1 to $(0, \sqrt{\gamma})$. We remark that, however, if we follow
\cite{Wang2013}, the term $\log \psi (1 + \beta)$ in Corollary 1
should be omitted when $\beta \in (0, \sqrt{\gamma})$, leading to incoherence between the analytical and empirical power curves on $(0, \sqrt{\gamma})$.
Finally, the selection of shrinkage intensity $\lambda$ is still not well understood for hypothesis testing. As a reviewer points out, when $\lambda$ approaches $0$, the rLRT becomes irrelevant with the alternative covariance matrix and its power is expected to be close to the size. Thus, an appropriate selection of $\lambda$ is
important for good performance of the rLRT.
The selection of $\lambda$ for the purpose of improved estimation is well studied in
the literature, for example,
\citet{Ledoit2004}, \citet{Schafer2005} and \citet{Warton2008}. However, our additional
numerical study shows that such a choice of $\lambda$ for the estimation purpose cannot achieve a
power gain in testing problem. The optimal selection of $\lambda$ for the hypothesis testing needs further research.
\section*{Acknowledgements}
This paper is supported by National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the government (MSIP) (No. 2011-0030810). The authors are grateful to two reviewers and the AE for a careful reading and providing improvements.
|
\section{Introduction}
The regular languages have beautiful closure properties. For example, given two regular languages, their intersection is a regular language. Nevertheless, in the studies of programming languages, most of important languages are not regular. The same holds in the studies of formal models of natural languages. In the case of classes larger than the regular languages, closure properties are more difficult than the regular cases.
In particular, given two context-free languages, their intersection is not necessarily context-free. For a positive integer $k$, we consider the intersection of $k$ context-free languages, and let CFL($k$) denote the class of all such intersections. CFL(1) is CFL, the class of all context-free languages. It is known that CFL($k$) is a proper subset of CFL($k+1$).
How complex is CFL($k+1$), relative to CFL($k$)?
An interesting observation is given by Flajolet and Steyaert \cite{FS1974}.
Let $L_{3\mathrm{eq}}$ denote the set of all strings of the form $0^n 1^n 2^n$ where $n$ is a natural number.
It is easily seen that $L_{3\mathrm{eq}}$ belongs to CFL($2$).
Flajolet and Steyaert observed that $L_{3\mathrm{eq}}$ is CFL-immune.
Here, an immune set is a key concept in the classical recursion theory, namely in Post's problem.
Later, immune sets relative to complexity classes are studied in the complexity theory \cite{YS2005}. Given a class ${\cal C}$ of languages, an infinite language $A$ is \emph{${\cal C}$-immune}\/ if no infinite subset of $A$ belongs to ${\cal C}$.
\vspace{\baselineskip}
\noindent
\textbf{Yamakami's problem}~
Yamakami \cite{Y2011} raised a problem whether there is a CFL-immune set in CFL(2) - CFL/$n$.
\vspace{\baselineskip}
Here, the $n$ of CFL/$n$ denotes the length of an input.
\begin{definition} \label{def:cslashntyl} (Tadaki et al. \cite{TYL2005})
Given a class ${\cal C}$ of languages, we define ${\cal C}/n$ as follows.
Suppose that $L$ is a language over an alphabet $\Sigma$. Suppose that $\Gamma$ is another alphabet.
We introduce an extended alphabet $\left[ \begin{array}{c} \Sigma \\ \Gamma \end{array} \right]$. It consists of all symbols of the form $\left[ \begin{array}{c} x \\ a \end{array} \right]$ for $x \in \Sigma$ and $a \in \Gamma$.
Given two strings $x=x_1 \cdots x_n \in \Sigma^n$ and $a = a_1 \cdots a_n \in \Gamma^n$ of the same length, we let $\left[ \begin{array}{c} x \\ a \end{array} \right]$ denote the string
$\left[ \begin{array}{c} x_1 \\ a_1 \end{array} \right] \cdots \left[ \begin{array}{c} x_n \\ a_n \end{array} \right] \in \left[ \begin{array}{c} \Sigma \\ \Gamma \end{array} \right]^n$.
A language $L$ belongs to ${\cal C}/n$ if and only if there exist a language $L^{\prime} \in {\cal C}$ and a function $h : \mathbb{N} \to \Gamma^\ast$ such that for every $x \in \Sigma^\ast$, the length of $h(|x|)$ is the same as that of $x$ and the following holds.
\[
x \in L \,\, \Leftrightarrow \,\,
\left[ \begin{array}{c} x \\ h(|x|) \end{array} \right] \in L^{\prime}
\]
Then, $h$ is called an \emph{advice function}. $h(n)$ is the advice at length $n$.
\qed
\end{definition}
Motives for the problem of Yamakami are the following examples on DCFL (the class of languages accepted by deterministic pushdown automata) and REG (the regular languages).
(i) Let $L_{\mathrm{eq}}$ denote the set of all strings of the form $0^n 1^n$ ($n \geq 1$).
Then $L_{\mathrm{eq}}$ belongs to DCFL $\cap$ REG$/n$ and is REG-immune \cite{FS1974}.
(ii) Let Pal${}_\sharp$ denote the palindromes whose center symbol is a special symbol $\sharp$. Then Pal${}_\sharp$ belongs to DCFL $-$ REG$/n$ and is REG-immune \cite{Y2011}.
The CFL-immune set $L_{3\mathrm{eq}}$ given in \cite{FS1974} belongs to
CFL(2) $\cap$ CFL$/n$. Thus, it is natural and interesting to ask whether there is a CFL-immune set in CFL(2) $-$ CFL$/n$.
The best known so far is that LSPACE - CFL/$n$ has a CFL-immune set \cite{Y2011},
where LSPACE denotes the class of languages recognized by deterministic Turing machines with a single read-only input tape and a logarithmic-space bounded work tape.
What is the difficult point in the problem of Yamakami?
A classical method of showing that a language is not context-free is the pumping lemma for CFL (Bar-Hillel's lemma \cite{BPS1961}). However, the pumping lemma destroys the advice $h(n)$.
Our main theorem is an affirmative solution to the problem of Yamakami.
Two key concepts of our proof are the nested palindrome and Yamakami's swapping lemma. Our test language is introduced in section~\ref{section:testlanguage}.
The swapping lemma is applicable to the setting where the pumping lemma does not work. Our proof is an example showing how useful the swapping lemma is.
We show our main theorem in section~\ref{section:main}.
There is a study of advised context-free languages earlier than Tadaki et al. \cite{TYL2005}.
In the setting of Damm and Holzer \cite{DH1995}, the arrangement of the advice and the input is serial.
In section~\ref{section:serial}, we show that the same result as our main theorem holds for the advised language class of Damm and Holzer.
\section{Preliminaries}
\subsection{Notation}
For two sets $A$ and $B$, their \emph{difference} $A - B$ is $\{ x \in A : x \not\in B \}$.
$A \subset B$ denotes that $A$ is a subset of $B$; $A$ may equal to $B$.
$\mathbb{N}=\{ 0,1,2, \ldots \}$ is the set of all natural numbers.
For a real number $x$, $\lceil x \rceil$ denotes the minimal natural number $n \geq x$.
The empty string is denoted by $\lambda$.
An \emph{alphabet} denotes a finite set of characters.
For an alphabet $\Sigma$, the set of all strings is denoted by $\Sigma^\ast$.
We let $\Sigma^+$ denote $\Sigma^\ast - \{ \lambda \}$.
Given a string $w$, its \emph{length} $|w|$ denotes the total number of occurrences of characters.
The \emph{reverse} of $w=w_1 \cdots w_n$, where $n=|w|$, is $w_n \cdots w_1$.
The reverse of $w$ is denoted by $w^R$.
REG (CFL, respectively) is the class of all regular (context-free) languages.
Suppose that ${\cal C}$ is a given class of languages such as REG or CFL.
An advised class ${\cal C}/n$ is defined as in Introduction.
\begin{figure}[h]
\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{ll}
\begin{tabular}{c|c|c|c|}
\cline{1-4}
$z_k$ & \,\, $\cdots$ \,\, & $z_2$ & $z_1$\\
\cline{1-4}
\end{tabular}
& pushdown memory (stack)
\\
&
\\
\textcent \, is the left-end symbol. & \$ is the right-end symbol.
\\
&
\\
\begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|}
\cline{1-7}
\raisebox{-5pt}[0cm][0cm]{\textcent} & $x_1$ & $x_2$ & $\cdots$ & $x_{n-1}$ & $x_n$ & \raisebox{-5pt}[0cm][0cm]{\$}\\
\cline{2-6}
& $a_1$ & $a_2$ & $\cdots$ & $a_{n-1}$ & $a_n$ & \\
\cline{1-7}
\multicolumn{1}{c}{} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{$\bigtriangleup$} & \multicolumn{5}{c}{} \\
\cline{2-2}
\multicolumn{1}{c}{} & \multicolumn{1}{|c|}{$q_0$} & \multicolumn{5}{c}{} \\
\cline{2-2}
\end{tabular}
&
\begin{tabular}{l}
$h(n)=a_1 \cdots a_n$ in the 2nd track \\
is the advice at length $n$. \\
head (reading a symbol $\left[ \begin{array}{c} x_1 \\ a_1 \end{array} \right]$) \\
the current state
\end{tabular}
\end{tabular}
\caption{A non-deterministic pushdown automaton with an advice \label{fig:npda}}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
The class CFL/$n$ is characterized by \emph{non-deterministic pushdown automata with an advice function} (Fig.~\ref{fig:npda}).
It has a one-way read-only input tape and a pushdown memory (stack).
The input tape has two tracks. An input is given on the first track.
The advise at the length of the input is given on the second track.
Then the automaton works as a non-deterministic automaton over the alphabet $\left[ \begin{array}{c} \Sigma \\ \Gamma \end{array} \right]$.
${\cal C}(2)$ is the class of all languages that are intersections of two elements of ${\cal C}$.
We have REG(2) = REG. On the other hand, CFL is a proper subset of CFL(2).
An infinite language $L$ is \emph{${\cal C}$-immune} if $L$ does not have an infinite subset that belongs to ${\cal C}$.
\subsection{The Swapping Lemma for Context-free Languages}
Suppose that $n$ is a positive integer, $S$ is a set of strings of length $n$,
$i$ and $j$ are natural numbers such that $i+j \leq n$,
and that $u$ is a string over $\Sigma$ of length $j$.
Yamakami \cite{Y2009} defines a subset $S_{i,u}$ of $S$ as follows.
\[
S_{i,u} = \{ v_1 \cdots v_n \in S : v_{i+1}\cdots v_{i+j} = u \}
\]
Thus, the definition of $S_{i,u}$ depends on $j$ but we omit the suffix $j$.
The swapping lemma asserts that if the ratio $|S_{i,u}|/|S|$ is small enough
for any $i,j,u$ (with certain properties)
then there exist two strings $x, y \in S$ such that $x^\prime$ and $y^\prime$ belong to $L$,
where strings $x^\prime$ and $y^\prime$ are obtained by swapping the midsections of $x$ and $y$,
and such that the midsections are different.
\begin{lemma}[The Swapping Lemma for Context-free languages \cite{Y2009}]
Suppose that $\Sigma $ has at least two letters, and that $L$ is an infinite context-free language over $\Sigma$.
Then, there exists a positive integer $m$, \emph{a swapping lemma constant}, with the following properties.
Suppose that $n \geq 2$ is a natural number, $S$ is a subset of $L \cap \Sigma^n$,
and $j_0, k$ are natural numbers such that $2 \leq j_0$, $2j_0 \leq k \leq n$,
and such that for any positive integer $i \leq n - j_0$ and any string $u \in \Sigma^{j_0}$,
we have:
\[
|S_{i,u}| < |S|/m(k - j_0 +1)(n - j_0 +1)
\]
Then, there exist positive integers
$i, j$ and two strings $x=x_1 x_2 x_3, y = y_1 y_2 y_3 \in S$ with the following properties:
$i + j \leq n$, $j_0 \leq j \leq k$, $|x_1|=|y_1|=i$, $|x_2|=|y_2|=j$, $|x_3|=|y_3|$,
$x_2 \ne y_2$, $x_1 y_2 x_3 \in L$, and $y_1 x_2 y_3 \in L$.
\end{lemma}
\section{Our Test Language} \label{section:testlanguage}
\begin{definition}
Suppose that we regard each natural number as a letter.
Suppose $\Sigma $ is a finite subset of $\mathbb{N}$ and $w=w_1 \cdots w_n$
is a string over $\Sigma$.
Given a natural number $c$, let $\Sigma_{\times c}$ denote $\{ c \times m: m \in \Sigma \}$.
We let $(w)_{\times c}$ denote the string over $\Sigma_{\times c}$
given by each component of $w$ multiplied by $c$.
\[
(w_1 \cdots w_n)_{\times c} = u_1 \cdots u_n,
\mbox{ where } u_j = c \times w_j \mbox{, for each $j$}
\]
\qed
\end{definition}
For example, $(1211)_{\times 3} = 3633$.
\begin{definition} \label{definition:l2}
We define our test language $L_2$ as follows (the suffix 2 is that of CFL(2)).
\[
L_2 := \{ w (w^R)_{\times 3} (w)_{\times 15} (w^R)_{\times 5} : w \in \{ 1,2 \}^+ \}
\]
\qed
\end{definition}
\section{Main Theorem and Its Proof} \label{section:main}
\begin{lemma} \label{lemma:1}
$L_2$ belongs to $\mathrm{CFL}(2)$.
\end{lemma}
\begin{proof}
We define languages $L_{2,1}$ and $L_{2,2}$ as follows. These are clearly context-free languages.
\begin{align*}
L_{2,1} &:= \{ w (w^R)_{\times 3} x : w \in \{ 1,2 \}^+, x \in \{ 5, 10, 15, 30 \}^+ \}
\\
L_{2,2} &:= \{ y (y^R)_{\times 5} : y \in \{ 1,2,3,6 \}^+ \}
\end{align*}
Then it holds that $L_2 = L_{2,1} \cap L_{2,2}$.
Hence $L_2$ belongs to CFL(2).
\end{proof}
\begin{lemma} \label{lemma:2}
$L_2$ is $\mathrm{CFL}$-immune.
\end{lemma}
\begin{proof}
$L_2$ is a subset of $L_2^\prime := \{ wxy : |w|=|x|, 2|w|=|y|, w \in \{ 1,2 \}^+, x \in \{ 3,6 \}^+ \mbox{ and } y \in \{ 5, 10, 15, 30 \}^+
\}$.
Let $L_2^{\prime\prime} := \{ a^n b^n c^{2n} : n \in \mathbb{N} \}$.
A standard argument based on Bar-Hillel's lemma shows that $L_2^{\prime\prime}$ is CFL-immune, and a similar argument shows that $L_2^\prime $ is CFL-immune.
Hence, $L_2$ is CFL-immune.
\end{proof}
\begin{theorem} \label{theorem:main} (Main theorem)
There exists a $\mathrm{CFL}$-immune set in $\mathrm{CFL}(2) - \mathrm{CFL}/n$.
\end{theorem}
\begin{proof}
By Lemmas~\ref{lemma:1} and \ref{lemma:2}, it is sufficient to show that $L_2$ does not belong to CFL/$n$.
We work with Yamakami's swapping lemma for context-free languages \cite{Y2009}.
Consult Example 4.2 of \cite{Y2009} for a basic usage of the swapping lemma.
For a proof by contradiction, fix a function $h$ and a context-free language $L$ such that
$\forall n ~ |h(n)| = n$,
and such that for any $\xi \in \{ 1,2,3,6,5,10,15,30 \}^*$, the following holds.
\[
\xi \in L_2 \,\, \leftrightarrow \,\, \begin{bmatrix} \xi \\ h(| \xi |) \end{bmatrix} \in L
\]
Let $m$ be a swapping lemma constant for the context-free language $L$.
Let $n$ be a multiple of 16 with the following property.
\begin{equation} \label{eq:main:1}
2^{n/4} > (2mn^2)^4
\end{equation}
We define a subset $S$ of $L$ as follows.
\[
S := \left\{ \begin{bmatrix} \xi \\ h(n) \end{bmatrix} \in L : \xi \in \{ 1,2,3,6,5,10,15,30 \}^n \right\}
\]
Since the string $w (w^R)_{\times 3} (w)_{\times 15} (w^R)_{\times 5}$ is uniquely determined by
$w \in \{ 1,2 \}^+$, the following holds.
\begin{equation} \label{eq:main:2}
|S| = 2^{n/4}
\end{equation}
Let $k$ and $j_0$ be the followings. Here, the base of the logarithm is 2.
\begin{align}
k &:= n/4 \label{eq:main:4}
\\
j_0 &:= 2(\lceil \log (mn^2) \rceil +1) \label{eq:main:5}
\end{align}
By \eqref{eq:main:1} and \eqref{eq:main:4},
$k = n/4 > 4 ( \log (mn^2) + 1) $.
Since $n/4$ is a multiple of 4, $k \geq 4 ( \lceil \log (mn^2) \rceil + 1) $.
By \eqref{eq:main:5}, we get the following.
\begin{equation} \label{eq:main:6}
k \geq 2 j_0
\end{equation}
Given a natural number $i$ and a string $u$ over the alphabet of $L$
such that $i + j_0 \leq n$ and $|u|=j_0$, we define $S_{i,u}$ as follows.
\[
S_{i,u} = \{ v_1 \cdots v_n \in S : v_{i+1}\cdots v_{i+j_0} = u \}
\]
When $w (w^R)_{\times 3} (w)_{\times 15} (w^R)_{\times 5}$ is in $S_{i,u}$,
some bits of $w$ are bound by $u$.
We are going to estimate the number of bits bound by $u$.
The minimal number is achieved when $u$
spans the border of any two blocks with the center of $u$ at the border.
Thus, at least $\lceil j_0 / 2 \rceil$ bits of $w$ are bound by $u$.
Therefore, we have the following.
\begin{equation} \label{eq:main:3}
|S_{i,u}| \leq 2^{n/4 - j_0/2}
\end{equation}
Now, we have the following.
\begin{equation} \label{eq:main:7}
|S_{i,u}| < |S| / kmn
\end{equation}
This is shown as follows.
$2^{j_0 / 2} \geq 2mn^2$ [by \eqref{eq:main:5}] ~
$= 8kmn$ [by \eqref{eq:main:4}] ~
$> kmn$. Thus, $2^{j_0 / 2} > kmn$.
By \eqref{eq:main:2} and \eqref{eq:main:3}, we have shown \eqref{eq:main:7}.
By \eqref{eq:main:6} and \eqref{eq:main:7}, we can apply the swapping lemma for context-free languages \cite[Lemma 4.1]{Y2009} to the present setting.
By the swapping lemma, there exist natural numbers $i,j$ and strings $x,y \in S$ with the following properties.
\begin{itemize}
\item
$1 \leq i \leq n -j$ and $j_0 \leq j \leq k (= n/4)$
\item
$x,y$ are of the form $x = x_1 x_2 x_3, y= y_1 y_2 y_3$, where each $x_\ell$ and $y_\ell$ are strings,
and it holds that $|x_1|=|y_1|=i$, $|x_2|=|y_2|=j$, $|x_3|=|y_3|$, $x_2 \ne y_2$,
$x_1 y_2 x_3 \in L$ and $y_1 x_2 y_3 \in L$.
\end{itemize}
Let $\xi, \eta, \xi_\ell$ and $\eta_\ell$ ($\ell = 1,2,3$) be the projections of
$x, y, x_\ell$ and $y_\ell$ to the first track, respectively.
For example,
\(
x = \begin{bmatrix} \xi \\ h(n) \end{bmatrix},
y = \begin{bmatrix} \eta \\ h(n) \end{bmatrix}
\).
Since $x$ belongs to $L$ and the second component is $h(n)$, it holds that $\xi \in L_2$. Therefore $\xi$ is of the form $w (w^R)_{\times 3} (w)_{\times 15} (w^R)_{\times 5}$ for some string $w$ of length $n/4$. Here, it holds that $|\xi_2|=j \leq k = n/4 = |w|$.
Therefore, $\xi_2$ is included by either one of $w$, $(w^R)_{\times 3}$, $(w)_{\times 15}$ and $(w^R)_{\times 5}$ or included by consecutive two of them.
The same holds for $\eta_2$.
Fig.~\ref{fig:iplusjleqn4} demonstrates the case of $i+j \leq n/4$.
Here, $\xi_2$ is included by $w$.
Fig.~\ref{fig:ilessn4lessiplusj} demonstrates the case of $i < n/4 < i+j$.
Here, $\xi_2$ is included by $w (w^R)_{\times 3}$. The other cases are similar.
The swapping of $x_2$ and $y_2$ does not affect the second components $h(n)$ of $x$ and $y$
(Fig.~\ref{fig:swapnotaffect}).
Thus both $\xi_1 \xi_2 \xi_3$ and $\xi_1 \eta_2 \xi_3$ belong to $L_2$, and $\xi_2 \ne \eta_2$.
Hence, we get a contradiction.
\begin{figure}[htb]
\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{p{2em}p{2em}p{2em}p{2em}p{2em}p{2em}p{2em}p{5em}}
\cline{2-8}
&
\multicolumn{2}{|c|}{} &
\multicolumn{2}{c|}{} &
\multicolumn{3}{c}{}
\\
&
\multicolumn{2}{|c|}{\raisebox{4pt}[0cm][0cm]{\quad $\xi_1$ \quad}} &
\multicolumn{2}{c|}{\raisebox{4pt}[0cm][0cm]{\quad $\xi_2$ \quad}} &
\multicolumn{3}{c}{\raisebox{4pt}[0cm][0cm]{$\xi_3$}}
\\
\cline{2-8}
& & \multicolumn{2}{c}{$i$} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{$i+j$} & &
\\
& & & & & & &
\\
\cline{2-8}
= & \multicolumn{5}{|c|}{} &
\multicolumn{2}{c}{}
\\
& \multicolumn{5}{|c|}{\raisebox{4pt}[0cm][0cm]{$w$}} &
\multicolumn{2}{c}{\raisebox{4pt}[0cm][0cm]{$(w^R)_{\times 3} (w)_{\times 15} (w^R)_{\times 5}$}}
\\
\cline{2-8}
& & & & &\multicolumn{2}{c}{$n/4$} &
\end{tabular}
\caption{The case of $i+j \leq n/4$ \label{fig:iplusjleqn4}}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure}[htb]
\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{p{2em}p{2em}p{2em}p{2em}p{2em}p{2em}p{2em}p{5em}}
\cline{2-8}
&
\multicolumn{2}{|c|}{} &
\multicolumn{2}{c|}{} &
\multicolumn{3}{c}{}
\\
&
\multicolumn{2}{|c|}{\raisebox{4pt}[0cm][0cm]{\quad $\xi_1$ \quad}} &
\multicolumn{2}{c|}{\raisebox{4pt}[0cm][0cm]{\quad $\xi_2$ \quad}} &
\multicolumn{3}{c}{\raisebox{4pt}[0cm][0cm]{$\xi_3$}}
\\
\cline{2-8}
& & \multicolumn{2}{c}{$i$} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{$i+j$} & &
\\
& & & & & & &
\\
\cline{2-8}
= & \multicolumn{3}{|c|}{} &
\multicolumn{2}{c|}{} &
\multicolumn{2}{c}{}
\\
& \multicolumn{3}{|c|}{\raisebox{4pt}[0cm][0cm]{$w$}} &
\multicolumn{2}{|c|}{\raisebox{4pt}[0cm][0cm]{$(w^R)_{\times 3}$}} &
\multicolumn{2}{c}{\raisebox{4pt}[0cm][0cm]{$(w)_{\times 15} (w^R)_{\times 5}$}}
\\
\cline{2-8}
& & & \multicolumn{2}{c}{$n/4$} &\multicolumn{2}{c}{$n/2$} &
\end{tabular}
\caption{The case of $i < n/4 < i+j$ \label{fig:ilessn4lessiplusj}}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure}[H]
\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{p{2.5em}p{2.5em}p{3.5em}p{4.5em}p{1em}p{2.5em}p{3.5em}p{4.5em}}
\cline{2-4} \cline{6-8}
&
\multicolumn{1}{|c|}{\raisebox{4pt}[0cm][0cm]{}} &
\multicolumn{1}{c|}{\raisebox{4pt}[0cm][0cm]{}} &
\multicolumn{1}{c|}{\raisebox{4pt}[0cm][0cm]{}}
& &
\multicolumn{1}{|c|}{\raisebox{4pt}[0cm][0cm]{}} &
\multicolumn{1}{c|}{\raisebox{4pt}[0cm][0cm]{}} &
\multicolumn{1}{c|}{\raisebox{4pt}[0cm][0cm]{}} \\
&
\multicolumn{1}{|c|}{\raisebox{4pt}[0cm][0cm]{$\xi_1$}} &
\multicolumn{1}{c|}{\raisebox{4pt}[0cm][0cm]{$\xi_2$}} &
\multicolumn{1}{c|}{\raisebox{4pt}[0cm][0cm]{$\xi_3$}}
& &
\multicolumn{1}{|c|}{\raisebox{4pt}[0cm][0cm]{$\eta_1$}} &
\multicolumn{1}{c|}{\raisebox{4pt}[0cm][0cm]{$\eta_2$}} &
\multicolumn{1}{c|}{\raisebox{4pt}[0cm][0cm]{$\eta_3$}} \\
\cline{2-4} \cline{6-8}
&
\multicolumn{1}{|c|}{\raisebox{4pt}[0cm][0cm]{}} &
\multicolumn{1}{c|}{\raisebox{4pt}[0cm][0cm]{}} &
\multicolumn{1}{c|}{\raisebox{4pt}[0cm][0cm]{}}
& &
\multicolumn{1}{|c|}{\raisebox{4pt}[0cm][0cm]{}} &
\multicolumn{1}{c|}{\raisebox{4pt}[0cm][0cm]{}} &
\multicolumn{1}{c|}{\raisebox{4pt}[0cm][0cm]{}} \\
&
\multicolumn{1}{|c|}{\raisebox{4pt}[0cm][0cm]{$\bigcirc \lhd$}} &
\multicolumn{1}{c|}{\raisebox{4pt}[0cm][0cm]{$\blacktriangle \, \blacksquare \, \blacklozenge$}} &
\multicolumn{1}{c|}{\raisebox{4pt}[0cm][0cm]{$\bigtriangledown \bigcirc \lozenge \rhd $}}
& &
\multicolumn{1}{|c|}{\raisebox{4pt}[0cm][0cm]{$\bigcirc \lhd$}} &
\multicolumn{1}{c|}{\raisebox{4pt}[0cm][0cm]{$\blacktriangle \, \blacksquare \, \blacklozenge$}} &
\multicolumn{1}{c|}{\raisebox{4pt}[0cm][0cm]{$\bigtriangledown \bigcirc \lozenge \rhd $}}
\\
\cline{2-4} \cline{6-8}
& & & & & & &
\\
&
\multicolumn{1}{c}{\raisebox{4pt}[0cm][0cm]{$x_1$}} &
\multicolumn{1}{c}{\raisebox{4pt}[0cm][0cm]{$x_2$}} &
\multicolumn{1}{c}{\raisebox{4pt}[0cm][0cm]{$x_3$}} &
&
\multicolumn{1}{c}{\raisebox{4pt}[0cm][0cm]{$y_1$}} &
\multicolumn{1}{c}{\raisebox{4pt}[0cm][0cm]{$y_2$}} &
\multicolumn{1}{c}{\raisebox{4pt}[0cm][0cm]{$y_3$}}
\\
swap & & & & & & &
\\
\cline{2-4} \cline{6-8}
$\rightarrow$
&
\multicolumn{1}{|c|}{\raisebox{4pt}[0cm][0cm]{}} &
\multicolumn{1}{c|}{\raisebox{4pt}[0cm][0cm]{}} &
\multicolumn{1}{c|}{\raisebox{4pt}[0cm][0cm]{}}
& &
\multicolumn{1}{|c|}{\raisebox{4pt}[0cm][0cm]{}} &
\multicolumn{1}{c|}{\raisebox{4pt}[0cm][0cm]{}} &
\multicolumn{1}{c|}{\raisebox{4pt}[0cm][0cm]{}} \\
&
\multicolumn{1}{|c|}{\raisebox{4pt}[0cm][0cm]{$\xi_1$}} &
\multicolumn{1}{c|}{\raisebox{4pt}[0cm][0cm]{$\eta_2$}} &
\multicolumn{1}{c|}{\raisebox{4pt}[0cm][0cm]{$\xi_3$}}
& &
\multicolumn{1}{|c|}{\raisebox{4pt}[0cm][0cm]{$\eta_1$}} &
\multicolumn{1}{c|}{\raisebox{4pt}[0cm][0cm]{$\xi_2$}} &
\multicolumn{1}{c|}{\raisebox{4pt}[0cm][0cm]{$\eta_3$}} \\
\cline{2-4} \cline{6-8}
&
\multicolumn{1}{|c|}{\raisebox{4pt}[0cm][0cm]{}} &
\multicolumn{1}{c|}{\raisebox{4pt}[0cm][0cm]{}} &
\multicolumn{1}{c|}{\raisebox{4pt}[0cm][0cm]{}}
& &
\multicolumn{1}{|c|}{\raisebox{4pt}[0cm][0cm]{}} &
\multicolumn{1}{c|}{\raisebox{4pt}[0cm][0cm]{}} &
\multicolumn{1}{c|}{\raisebox{4pt}[0cm][0cm]{}} \\
&
\multicolumn{1}{|c|}{\raisebox{4pt}[0cm][0cm]{$\bigcirc \lhd$}} &
\multicolumn{1}{c|}{\raisebox{4pt}[0cm][0cm]{$\blacktriangle \, \blacksquare \, \blacklozenge$}} &
\multicolumn{1}{c|}{\raisebox{4pt}[0cm][0cm]{$\bigtriangledown \bigcirc \lozenge \rhd $}}
& &
\multicolumn{1}{|c|}{\raisebox{4pt}[0cm][0cm]{$\bigcirc \lhd$}} &
\multicolumn{1}{c|}{\raisebox{4pt}[0cm][0cm]{$\blacktriangle \, \blacksquare \, \blacklozenge$}} &
\multicolumn{1}{c|}{\raisebox{4pt}[0cm][0cm]{$\bigtriangledown \bigcirc \lozenge \rhd $}}
\\
\cline{2-4} \cline{6-8}
& & & & & & &
\\
&
\multicolumn{1}{c}{\raisebox{4pt}[0cm][0cm]{$x_1$}} &
\multicolumn{1}{c}{\raisebox{4pt}[0cm][0cm]{$y_2$}} &
\multicolumn{1}{c}{\raisebox{4pt}[0cm][0cm]{$x_3$}} &
&
\multicolumn{1}{c}{\raisebox{4pt}[0cm][0cm]{$y_1$}} &
\multicolumn{1}{c}{\raisebox{4pt}[0cm][0cm]{$x_2$}} &
\multicolumn{1}{c}{\raisebox{4pt}[0cm][0cm]{$y_3$}}
\end{tabular}
\vspace{.5\baselineskip}
\hspace{4.5em} $h(n) = \bigcirc \lhd \, \blacktriangle \, \blacksquare \, \blacklozenge \, \bigtriangledown \bigcirc \lozenge \rhd $
\caption{The swapping does not affect the second track \label{fig:swapnotaffect}}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
Thus, we have shown that $L_2$ does not belong to CFL/$n$. Hence, we have shown the theorem.
\end{proof}
\section{Serial Advices} \label{section:serial}
\subsection{A Variation of the Main Theorem}
Damm and Holzer \cite{DH1995} investigated advised language classes earlier than Tadaki et al. \cite{TYL2005}. In the definition of Damm and Holzer, the arrangement of the advice and the input is serial, while in that of Tadaki et al., it is parallel.
In this section, we show that the same result as our main theorem holds for the advised language class in the sense of Damm and Holzer.
\begin{definition} \label{def:cslashndh} (Damm and Holzer \cite{DH1995})
Given a class ${\cal C}$ of languages, the advised language class ${\cal C}/n$ in the sense of Damm and Holzer is defined as follows.
Suppose that $\Sigma$ and $\Gamma_0$ are alphabets.
Suppose that $L$ is a language over $\Sigma$.
A language $L$ belongs to ${\cal C}/n$ (in the sense of Damm and Holzer) if and only if there exist a language $L^{\prime\prime} \in {\cal C}$ and a function $g : \mathbb{N} \to \Gamma_0^\ast$ such that
$\forall n ~ |g(n)|=n$, and such that the following holds.
\[
x \in L \,\, \Leftrightarrow \,\, g(|x|) ~x \in L^{\prime\prime}
\]
Here, $g(|x|) ~x$ is the concatenation of $g(|x|)$ and $x$.
Then, $g$ is called an \emph{advice function}. $g(n)$ is the advice at length $n$.
\qed
\end{definition}
In the remainder of the paper, ${\cal C}/n$ denotes the advised class in the sense of Tadaki, Yamakami and Lin \cite{TYL2005}, that is, the parallel one defined in Introduction.
On the other hand, $({\cal C}/n)_\mathrm{serial}$ denotes the advised class defined in this section.
The following is a variation of our main theorem.
\begin{theorem} \label{theorem:maindh}
There exists a $\mathrm{CFL}$-immune set in $\mathrm{CFL}(2) - (\mathrm{CFL}/n)_\mathrm{serial}$.
\end{theorem}
\begin{proof}
Let $L_2$ be the language defined in Definition~\ref{definition:l2}.
In the same way as the proof of Theorem~\ref{theorem:main},
it is sufficient to show that $L_2$ does not belong to $(\mathrm{CFL}/n)_\mathrm{serial}$.
Fix an advice function $g$ and a context-free language $L$ such that for any
$x \in \{ 1,2,3,6,5,10,15,30 \}^*$, the following holds.
\[
x \in L_2 \,\, \leftrightarrow \,\, g(|x|)~x \in L
\]
Choose natural numbers $m, n, k, j_0$ in the exactly same way as the proof of Theorem~\ref{theorem:main}.
We define a subset $S$ of $L$ as follows.
\[
S := \left\{ g(n)~x \in L : x \in \{ 1,2,3,6,5,10,15,30 \}^n \right\}
\]
Thus, each member of $S$ has length $2n$.
We have $|S_{i,u}| < |S| / km(2n)$.
By the swapping lemma, there exist natural numbers $i,j$ and strings $x$ and $y$ of the following properties.
$g(n)~x$ and $g(n)~y$ are in $S$ and they are of the form $g(n)~x = x_1 x_2 x_3$ and $g(n)~y= y_1 y_2 y_3$, where each $x_\ell$ and $y_\ell$ are strings,
and it holds that $|x_1|=|y_1|$, $|x_2|=|y_2| \leq n/4$, $|x_3|=|y_3|$, $x_2 \ne y_2$,
$x_1 y_2 x_3 \in L$ and $y_1 x_2 y_3 \in L$.
Since $x_2$ and $y_2$ are not identical, they are not substrings of $g(n)$.
Hence, in the same way as the proof of Theorem~\ref{theorem:main}, we get a contradiction.
Thus, we have shown that $L_2$ does not belong to $(\mathrm{CFL}/n)_\mathrm{serial}$.
Hence, we have shown the theorem.
\end{proof}
\subsection{Remarks and Problems}
In this subsection, we discuss separations of parallel advice classes and serial advice classes.
In general, the two concepts of advised classes do not coincide.
Recall that REG denotes the class of all regular languages.
\begin{example} \label{example:regslashndifferent1}
$\mathrm{REG}/n$ is not a subset of $(\mathrm{REG}/n)_\mathrm{serial}$.
A proof is as follows.
Damm and Holzer show that the language $L_\mathrm{eq} = \{ 0^n 1^n : n \in \mathbb{N} \}$ does not belong to $(\mathrm{REG}/n)_\mathrm{serial}$ \cite[Propositions 1 and 7]{DH1995}.
On the other hand, let $h(n)$ be $0^{n/2}1^{n/2}$ if $n$ is even; $2^n$ otherwise.
Then, by means of an advice function $h$, $L_\mathrm{eq}$ is shown to be in $\mathrm{REG}/n$.
\qed
\end{example}
\begin{example} \label{regslashnsubset}
$(\mathrm{REG}/n)_\mathrm{serial}$ is a subset of $\mathrm{REG}/n$.
A proof is as follows.
Suppose $L$ is an element of $(\mathrm{REG}/n)_\mathrm{serial}$. Let $L^{\prime\prime}$ and $g$ be a regular language and an advice function satisfying the requirements in Definition~\ref{def:cslashndh}. Let $M$ be a deterministic finite automaton that accepts $L^{\prime\prime}$.
Given a natural number $n$, let $q_{(n)}$ be the state when $M$ has read $g(n)$.
Provided that $q_{(n)}$ is given, without knowing what $g(n)$ is, we can simulate the moves of $M$ after reading $g(n)$.
Then, we define $h(n)$ as to be $q_{(n)}~0^{n-1}$.
The 0s in the tail are just for adjusting the length of $h(n)$.
Let $\Gamma$ be the union of $\{ 0 \}$ and the set of the states of $M$.
Now, it is easy to define a regular language $L^\prime$ satisfying the requirements in Definition~\ref{def:cslashntyl}
with respect to $\Gamma $ and $h$.
Therefore, $L$ belongs to $\mathrm{REG}/n$.
\qed
\end{example}
A direct proof of Example~\ref{example:regslashndifferent1} is given by means of prefix-free Kolmogorov complexity.
\begin{definition} \cite{N2009}
\begin{itemize}
\item
A string $u=u_1\cdots u_m$ is a \emph{prefix} of a string $v=v_1 \cdots v_n$ if $m \leq n$ and for each $i \leq m$ it holds that $u_i = v_i$.
A set $S$ of strings is \emph{prefix-free} if for each $u, v \in S$ such that $u \ne v$, $u$ is not a prefix of $v$. A partial function $M: \{ 0,1 \}^\ast \to \{ 0, 1 \}$ is called a \emph{prefix-free machine} if $M$ is a partial recursive function and the domain of $M$ is a prefix-free set.
\item
For a prefix-free machine $M$, its \emph{descriptive complexity} $K_M: \{ 0,1 \}^\ast \to \mathbb{N} \cup \{ \infty \}$ is defined as follows. Suppose $x \in \{ 0,1 \}^\ast$. If there exists $\sigma \in \{ 0,1 \}^\ast$ such that $M(\sigma )=x$ then $K_M (x)$ is the length of a shortest such $\sigma$.
If there is no such $\sigma$ then $K_M (x)$ is $\infty$.
\item
A prefix-free machine $R$ is an \emph{optimal prefix-free machine}\/ if for each prefix-free machine $M$, there is a constant $d$ (depending on $M$) such that for each $x \in \{ 0,1 \}^\ast$,
$K_R(x) \leq K_M(x) + d$.
\end{itemize}
\qed
\end{definition}
It is known that there exists an optimal prefix-free machine \cite[Proposition 2.2.7]{N2009}.
We fix such a machine $R$, and let $K$ denote $K_R$.
For an infinite binary string $Z : \mathbb{N} \to \{ 0,1 \}$ and a natural number $n$, we let $Z \upharpoonright n$ denote $Z(0)Z(1)\cdots Z(n-1)$.
It is known that there exists a binary string $Z$ of the following property \cite[section 3.2]{N2009}.
\begin{equation} \label{equation:chaitinrandom}
\exists b \in \mathbb{N} ~ \forall n \in \mathbb{N} \,\, [K(Z \upharpoonright n) > n -b]
\end{equation}
Example~\ref{example:regslashndifferent2} is a refinement of the proof by Damm and Holzer \cite{DH1995} that $L_\mathrm{eq} = \{ 0^n 1^n : n \in \mathbb{N} \} \not\in (\mathrm{REG}/n)_\mathrm{serial}$.
\begin{example} \label{example:regslashndifferent2}
A direct proof that $\mathrm{REG}/n$ is not a subset of $(\mathrm{REG}/n)_\mathrm{serial}$.
Let $Z$ be an infinite binary string satisfying \eqref{equation:chaitinrandom}.
Let $L := \{ Z \upharpoonright n : n \in \mathbb{N} \}$.
By means of an advice function $h(n) = Z \upharpoonright n$, $L$ is shown to be in $\mathrm{REG}/n$.
We are going to show that $L$ does not belong to $(\mathrm{REG}/n)_\mathrm{serial}$.
Assume that $L$ belongs to it. Suppose that $L^{\prime\prime}$ and $g$ are a regular language and an advice function satisfying the requirements in Definition~\ref{def:cslashndh}.
Suppose that $M$ is a deterministic finite automaton that accepts $L^{\prime\prime}$.
Let $Q$ be its set of states.
For each $n$, let $q_{(n)}$ be the state when $M$ has read $g(n)$.
We define a deterministic Turing machine $N$ as follows.
An input is an ordered pair $(q,n) \in Q \times \mathbb{N}$.
For each $y \in \{ 0,1 \}^n$, simulate the moves of $M$ as follows.
Set the state (of the virtual $M$) being $q$. Let $M$ read $y$. If $M$ accepts $y$, return $y$ and halt.
If the for-loop finishes without any output, then $N$ does not halt.
By the definition of $L^{\prime\prime}$ and $g$, for the input $(q_{(n)}, n)$, $N$ outputs $Z \upharpoonright n$. In addition, by a certain appropriate coding, we may assume that the domain of $N$ is a prefix free set.
For example, code an ordered pair $(u_1 \cdots u_m, v_1 \cdots v_\ell)$ by a string $u_1 u_1 \cdots u_m u_m 01 v_1 v_1 \cdots v_\ell v_\ell 01$.
Therefore, $ K_N (Z \upharpoonright n)$ is in the order of the length of $(q_{(n)},n)$.
Thus, it is $O ( \log_2 (n))$.
Hence, by the definition of an optimal machine,
$K(Z \upharpoonright n) \leq K_N (Z \upharpoonright n) + O(1) = O(\log_2 n)$.
This contradicts to the assumption of \eqref{equation:chaitinrandom}.
\qed
\end{example}
To our knowledge, we do not know whether the following hold.
\begin{enumerate}
\item $\mathrm{CFL}/n \subset (\mathrm{CFL}/n)_\mathrm{serial}$~?
\item $(\mathrm{CFL}/n)_\mathrm{serial} \subset \mathrm{CFL}/n$~?
\end{enumerate}
\section*{Acknowledgment}
The author would like to thank Tomoyuki Yamakami, Masahiro Kumabe and Yuki Mizusawa for helpful discussions.
|
\section{Introduction}\label{s:intro}\vspace{-0.05in}
As the demand for wireless communication increases, there is a greater challenge for improving network capacity. Allocating more spectrum by the aggregation of several component carriers is a method used to increase the delivered peak data rate and capacity \cite{2010_Yuan}. However, carrier aggregation comes at a substantial capital expenditure as the cellular network operators require first the acquisition of new spectrum and second the associated high network deployment costs to bring these new networks to commercial service. An alternative to spectrum expansion is to exploit the spatial dimension using multiple antennas at the transmitter and receiver, also referred to as MIMO \cite{2003_Paulraj}, which has been successfully used to increase the link throughput and network capacity for several wireless communications standards \cite{802.11,802.16,WCDMA,LTE_36.211}. Amongst the many transmission modes of MIMO \cite{2009_Lee}, multi-user MIMO (MU-MIMO) was proposed as a method for increasing the capacity of a wireless network \cite{2011_Duplicy}. In the LTE standard as an example, which uses MIMO and orthogonal frequency-division multiplexing (OFDM), multiple users on the downlink or uplink can be scheduled for transmission on the same physical resource blocks (PRBs) \cite{2011_Sesia}. The users are paired together such that their cascaded precoder-channel vectors are as orthogonal as possible. Therefore, the capacity is doubled by having the two users share the same time and frequency resource elements. In the downlink, the base station sends pilots over the resource blocks where the users are co-scheduled which are used to estimate the full MU-MIMO channel. For example, in transmission modes 7, 8, and 9 of the LTE standard, the base station transmits pilots with orthogonal cover codes that enable the estimation of the desired and co-scheduled users' channels. The inability of the two users' signals to appear as orthogonal waveforms to the receiver stems from: (1) the finite set of available precoders specified by the standard (to satisfy limited information feedback to be transmitted in the case of frequency division duplex systems) result in non-orthogonality between the users, and (2) during the potential delay between when users are co-scheduled and when the MU-MIMO transmission occurs, the channel state would have changed and thus the orthogonality between the users is lost, typical in the case of high Doppler scenarios. The receivers have only partial state information, since each user receiver has the ability to estimate the MU-MIMO channel, however the modulation constellation of the co-scheduled user remains to be unknown.
Several receiver processing methods at the user equipment (UE) have been proposed for MU-MIMO systems. One approach is to treat the co-scheduled user in MU-MIMO just as additional noise. This type of processing results in sub-optimal receiver performance as depicted in \cite{2011_Duplicy}. Another approach is to employ linear processing using minimum mean-squared error (MMSE) or interference rejection combining (IRC) as shown in \cite{2011_Bai}, where only the knowledge of the channel estimate of the co-scheduled interfering user is used in the detection of the desired user. In~\cite{2011_Ghaffar_a,2011_Ghaffar_b}, the constellation size of the interfering user's signal is presumed to be 16-QAM regardless of its actual size, and without making any attempt to estimate it, an maximum likelihood (ML) detector is used to separate the two users.
In this work, we consider optimal detection methods for MU-MIMO systems. We argue that detection performance can be enhanced if the UE receiver treats the co-scheduled user's signal as a constrained unknown to be estimated rather than just as additional random noise. We employ joint/conditional ML detection, where the constellation size of the co-scheduled user's signal needs to be estimated first before symbol detection and decoding are performed. We address the co-scheduled user's constellation size estimation problem as part of advanced MU-MIMO detection techniques. We show that the optimal MU-MIMO detector can be \emph{efficiently} implemented with a slight modification of the ML MIMO detector.
The rest of the paper is organized as follows. The system model is described in Section \ref{s:system_model}. Linear receiver methods are discussed in Section~\ref{s:linear_detect}, while the proposed joint optimal constellation size estimation and detection scheme is presented in Section~\ref{s:proposed_scheme}. In Section~\ref{s:implementation}, an efficient hardware architecture for the proposed MU-MIMO receiver is presented. Section~\ref{s:sim} discusses simulation results, while Section~\ref{s:conclusion} concludes the paper.
\textit{Notation}: Unless otherwise stated, lower case and upper case bold letters denote column vectors and matrices, respectively; $\mbf{I}_{N_r}$ denotes the identity matrix of size $N_r$; $(\cdot)^*$ denotes the complex conjugate transpose operation; $(\cdot)^T$ denotes the transpose operation; and $\E{Z}$ is the expectation of the random variable $Z$.
\vspace{-0.1in}
\section{System Model}\label{s:system_model}
Consider a generic OFDM-based MU-MIMO system where $K$ users are scheduled on the same PRBs. Denote by $N$ the number of tones in each PRB, and assume that each UE is equipped with $N_r$ antennas. The received frequency-domain complex signal $\mbf{y}_i\!\in\!\mathcal{C}^{N_r\times 1}$ at the UE of interest on the $\nth{i}$ resource element over which the $K$ users are scheduled is given b
\begin{equation}\label{eq:sys_model}
\mbf{y}_i = \mbf{H}_i \mbf{x}_i + \mbf{n}_i,~i\!=\!1,2,\cdots,N,
\end{equation}\\[-2.1em]
where $\mbf{H}_i \!\in\!\mathcal{C}^{N_r \times K}$ is the complex channel matrix, $\mbf{x}_i$ denotes the transmitted $K\!\times\! 1$ QAM symbol vector for $K$ users, and $\mbf{n}_i\!\in\!\mathcal{C}^{N_r\times 1}$ denotes thermal noise modeled as a zero-mean complex Gaussian random vector with covariance matrix $\E{\mbf{n}_i\mbf{n}^*_i}=\mbf{R}=\sigma^2 \mbf{I}_{N_r}$.
We consider the practical example where $K\!=\!N_{r}\!=\!2$, so that the received signal at the $\nth{i}$ resource element can be written as follows\vspace{-0.04in}
\begin{equation}\label{eq:yi_expanded}
\mbf{y}_i = \mbf{h}_1^{(i)}x_{1}^{(i)} + \mbf{h}_2^{(i)} x_{2}^{(i)} + \mbf{n}_i,~i=1,\cdots,N,
\end{equation}\\[-1.75em]
where $\mbf{H}_i \!\triangleq\! \bigl[ \mbf{h}_1^{(i)} ~\mbf{h}_2^{(i)} \bigr]$, and $\mbf{h}_1^{(i)}$ and $\mbf{h}_2^{(i)}$ denote the cascade of the channel and the precoders of the user 1 and user 2, respectively.
Let user 1 denote the user of interest while user 2 denote the interfering (co-scheduled) user whose constellation size is unknown to user 1. Denote $M_{S}$ and $M_{I}$ as the constellations of user 1 and user 2, respectively, and $N$ as the number of resource elements over which $M_{I}$ is constant. The symbols $x_{1}^{(i)}$ and $x_{2}^{(i)}$ represent $\text{log}_2(M_S)$ and $\text{log}_2(M_I)$ coded bits from a channel encoder (e.g., turbo code), respectively. The $\nth{j}$ bit of symbol $x_{1}^{(i)}$ is denoted by $b_{ij}$.
\vspace{-0.15in}
\section{Linear Receiver Methods}\label{s:linear_detect}
Two linear detection methods for MU-MIMO based on IRC are considered. They differ in terms of their complexity and performance.\vspace{-0.2in}
\subsection{Covariance-based Linear Receiver} \label{s:linear_cov}
This receiver structure estimates the interference covariance matrix using knowledge of only the desired user's channel, thus having least knowledge about the co-scheduled user. Denote $x_{1}^{(p)}$ and $\mbf{y}_p$ as the known pilot and received vector, respectively, on the $\nth{p}$ tone, where $p\!=\!1,2,\cdots,N_p$ and $N_p$ is the number of pilot tones amongst the set of $N$ tones over which the two users are co-scheduled. Then, the interference sample covariance matrix is estimated as\vspace{-0.075in}
\begin{equation}
\mbf{R_{uu}} = \frac{1}{N_p} \sum_{p=1}^{N_p} \mbf{u}_p \mbf{u}_p^*,
\end{equation}\\[-1.1em]
where $\mbf{u}_p = \mbf{y}_p - \mbf{h}_1^{(p)}x_{1}^{(p)}$. Note that there is a single interference covariance matrix generated per PRB, i.e. $\mbf{R_{uu}}$ is a sample covariance, obtained by averaging over the pilot tones in the PRB and thus is independent of the tone index $i$. The weight vector for the linear receiver is given by \cite{2003_Paulraj}\vspace{-0.075in}
\begin{equation} \label{eq:cov_linear}
\mbf{w}_{1,\mathsf{cov}}^{(i)} = \mbf{R}^{-1}_{\mbf{uu}} \mbf{h}_1^{(i)}.
\end{equation}
The desired user receiver applies this weight vector \eqref{eq:cov_linear} to the received vector to obtain $\mbf{w}_{1,\mathsf{cov}}^{(i)*} \mbf{y}_i\!\triangleq z_{1,\mathsf{cov}}$, which is a scalar used to generate the soft decision metric for decoding.
\vspace{-0.2in}
\subsection{Linear IRC Receiver} \label{s:linear_mmse}
An improvement over the covariance-based linear receiver is obtained wherein the UE receiver uses estimates of \emph{both} the desired channel as well as the co-scheduled user's channel. We arrive at an IRC weight vector that is given by \cite{2011_Bai
\begin{equation}
\mbf{w}_{1,\mathsf{IRC}}^{(i)} = \left( \mbf{h}_2^{(i)} \mbf{h}_2^{(i)*} + \mbf{R}_i \right)^{-1} \mbf{h}_1^{(i)}.
\end{equation}\\[-1.5em]
The desired user receiver processing is obtained b
\begin{equation}
z^{(i)}_{1,\mathsf{IRC}} = \mbf{w}_{1,\mathsf{IRC}}^{(i)*} \mbf{y}_i,
\end{equation}\\[-1.5em]
which can be approximated by a complex Gaussian random variance, i.e.
$\cpdf{\!z^{(i)}_{1,\mathsf{IRC}}}{x^{(i)}_1,\mbf{h}^{(i)}_1,\mbf{h}^{(i)}_2} \sim \mathcal{CN} \left( \mu_{z},\nu_{z}^2 \right)$ where the mean and variance are given b
\begin{align}
\mu_{z} &= \mbf{w}_{1,\mathsf{IRC}}^{(i)*} \mbf{h}^{(i)}_1 x^{(i)}_1\\[-0.25em]
\nu_{z}^2 &= \mbf{w}_{1,\mathsf{IRC}}^{(i)*} \left( \mbf{h}^{(i)}_2 \mbf{h}^{(i)*}_2 + \mbf{R}_i \right) \mbf{w}_{1,\mathsf{IRC}}^{(i)}.
\end{align}\\[-1.5em]
The LLR of the $\nth{j}$ bit of the desired user QAM symbol $x^{(i)}_1$ using the max-log-MAP approximation is given by
\begin{equation}\label{eq:LLR_IRC}
\Lambda \left( b_{ij} \right) \!=\!
\frac{1}{\nu_{z}^2}\! \left[\!
\underset{x_{1}^{(i)}\in M^{(-1)}_S}{\mathop{\min }}\!
\left| z^{(i)}_{1,\mathsf{IRC}} - \mu_{z} \right|^2
\!-\! \underset{x_{1}^{(i)}\in M^{(+1)}_S}{\mathop{\min }}\! \left| z^{(i)}_{1,\mathsf{IRC}} - \mu_{z} \right|^2 \!\right]
\end{equation}
where
$M^{(+1)}_S \!=\!\left\{x_{1}^{(i)}:b_{ij}\!=\!+1 \right\}$ and $M^{(-1)}_S \!=\!\left\{x_{1}^{(i)}:b_{ij}\!=\!-1 \right\}$.
\section{Reduced Complexity Constellation Size Estimation}\label{s:linear_const_det}
We estimate the constellation size of the co-scheduled user by nulling out the \emph{unknown} signal of the user of interest using a linear filter. The equivalent system after applying this linear filter to the received vector is given by the following single-input single output relatio
\begin{equation}\label{eq:yi_tild}
\tilde{y}_{i} = \mbf{g}_{i}^{*} \mbf{y}_{i}^{} = \mbf{g}_{i}^{*} \mbf{h}_{2}^{(i)} x_{2}^{(i)} + \mbf{g}_{i}^{*} \mbf{n}_{i}^{} \triangleq {a_i^{}}\text{ }x_{2}^{(i)}+{\tilde{n}_i},
\end{equation}\\[-1.75em]
where $\mbf{g}_{i}\!\in\!\mathcal{C}^{2\times 1}$ is chosen to be orthogonal to $\mbf{h}_{1}^{(i)}$, i.e., $\mbf{g}_{i}^{*}\mbf{h}_{1}^{(i)}=0$. The nulling filter is given by
$\mbf{g}_{i} = \mbf{G} \mbf{c}$, where $\mbf{c}$ is a $2 \times 1$ combining vector and $\mbf{G}$ is the left null-space projection matrix given by~\cite{1996_Golub}
\begin{equation}\label{eq:proj_matrix_G}
\mbf{G} = \left( \mbf{I}_2 - \frac{\mbf{h}_{1}^{(i)}\mbf{h}_{1}^{(i)*}}{\|\mbf{h}_{1}^{(i)}\|^2} \right).
\end{equation}
Since $\mbf{G}$ has rank 1, the combining vector can simply be $\mbf{c}=[1~~0]^T$.
Next, the ML estimate of the constellation is obtained based on the filtered received signal $\tilde{y}_{i}$ and can be approximated as
\begin{equation}\label{eq:Null_est_max_log}
\hat{M}_I \!\approx\! \underset{M_I\in \mathcal{M}}{\mathop{\arg\min }}\left(\! N\log\left( \abs{M_I} \right) + \sum\limits_{i=1}^{N} \frac{{\underset{x_{2}^{(i)}\in M_I}{\mathop{\min }}}\left| \tilde{y}_{i} - {a}_{i}x_{2}^{(i)} \right|^2}{\mbf{g}^*_i \mbf{R} \mbf{g}_i} \right),
\end{equation}
where $\log(\cdot)$ is the natural logarithmic function and $\mathcal{M}\!\triangleq\!\left\{ \varnothing,\text{4-QAM},\text{16-QAM},\text{64-QAM} \right\}$ denotes the set of allowable constellations that the interferer can assume, including the case when the co-scheduled user is not present, i.e. $\varnothing$. The derivation of \eqref{eq:Null_est_max_log} is omitted here as it follows closely the development of the next section. Once the co-scheduled user constellation, $\hat{M}_I$, is estimated, then the LLR are generated as shown in the next section.
\vspace{-0.1in}
\section{Joint Constellation Size Estimation and Detection}\label{s:proposed_scheme} \vspace{-0.05in}
The key idea is to better exploit the diversity offered by the two receive antennas. We develop an optimal receiver for user 1 based on a step of estimating the modulation constellation of user 2 using the received signal $\mbf{y}_i$ and knowledge of the channel. We derive the ML estimate of the constellation size based on the received signal itself $\mbf{y}_{i}$ instead of a reduced-dimension version obtained as was done in Section~\ref{s:linear_const_det}. The optimal ML estimator will inherently average out the unknown desired signal using knowledge of its constellation size, and yields better results than just nulling out the unknown signal. The new ML estimate of the constellation of the interfering user based on $\left\{\mbf{y}_{i}\right\}_{i=1}^{N}$ is given b
\begin{align}\label{eq:ML_estimate}
\hat{M}_I = \underset{M_I\in \mathcal{M}}{\mathop{\arg\max }}\,\mathrm{p}\left( \left. \left\{\mbf{y}_{i}\right\}_{i=1}^{N} \right|\left\{ \mbf{H}_i \right\}_{i=1}^{N},M_S,M_I, \right).
\end{align
Since $x_{1}^{(i)}, x_{2}^{(i)}$ and $\mbf{n}_{i}$ are independent for $i\!=\!1,\cdots,N$, the ML estimate of the interferer's constellation can then be written as\small
\begin{align}
{\hat{M}}_{I}
&\!=\! \underset{M_I\in \mathcal{M}}{\mathop{\arg\max}}\prod\limits_{i=1}^{N}{\mathrm{p}\left( \left.
\mbf{y}_{i} \right|\mbf{H}_i,M_S,M_I \right)} \label{eq:ML_estimate_step1}\\[-0.30em]
&\!=\! \underset{M_I\in\mathcal{M}} {\mathop{\arg\max}}\!\prod\limits_{i=1}^{N}{\!\!\!\sum\limits_{x_{1}^{(i)}\!\in\! M_S}{\!\!\sum\limits_{x_{2}^{(i)}\!\in\! M_I}{\!\!\!\!\!\mathrm{p}\!\left(\! \left. \mbf{y}_{i} \right|\!\mbf{H}_i\!,M_S\!,M_I\!,x_{1}^{(i)}\!,x_{2}^{(i)} \!\right)\!\mathrm{p}\!\left(\!x_{1}^{(i)}\!\right)\!\mathrm{p}\!\left(\!x_{2}^{(i)}\!\right)}}} \label{eq:ML_estimate_step2}\\[-1.45em]
&\!=\!\underset{M_I\in \mathcal{M}}{\mathop{\arg\max }}\,\frac{1}{{{\abs{M_{I}}}^{N}}}\prod\limits_{i=1}^{N}{\sum\limits_{x_{1}^{(i)}\in M_S}{\sum\limits_{x_{2}^{(i)}\in M_I}{\!\!\!\!\mathrm{p}\!\left(\! \left. \mbf{y}_{i} \right|\mbf{H}_i,M_S,M_I,x_{1}^{(i)},x_{2}^{(i)} \!\right)}}}\label{eq:ML_estimate_step3}
\end{align}\\[-2em]\normalsize
where $\abs{M_{I}}$ denotes the size of the interfering user constellation. The last equality follows from the assumptions that
\begin{align}\label{eq:prior_prob}
\mathrm{p}\left(x_{1}^{(i)}\right) = \frac{1}{M_S},\text{ }\text{ and }\mathrm{p}\left(x_{2}^{(i)}\right) = \frac{1}{M_I},\text{ }\forall i.
\end{align}
Let $\mbf{x}_i\!=\!\bigl[ x_{1}^{(i)}\, x_{2}^{(i)} \bigr]^T$ and $d(\mbf{x}_i)\!=\!\left( \mbf{y}_i\!-\!\mbf{H}_i\mbf{x}_i \right)^*\! \mbf{R}^{-1}\! \left( \mbf{y}_i\!-\! \mbf{H}_i \mbf{x}_i \right)$, we can then write $\hat{M}_I$ as\vspace{-0.1in}
\begin{align}\label{eq:ML_estimate_exp}
\hat{M}_I = \underset{ M_I \in \mathcal{M}}{\mathop{\arg\max }}\,\frac{1}{\abs{M_I}^{N}}\prod\limits_{i=1}^{N}{\sum\limits_{x_{1}^{(i)}\in M_S}{\sum\limits_{x_{2}^{(i)}\in M_I}{\exp{\left(-d(\mbf{x}_i)\right)}}}}.
\end{align}\\[-1em]
Using the max-log-MAP approximation, we have that
\begin{align}\label{eq:ML_estimate_max_log}
\hat{M}_I \!\approx\! \underset{M_I\in \mathcal{M}}{\mathop{\arg\min }}\left(\! N\log\left( \abs{M_I} \right) + \sum\limits_{i=1}^{N} {\underset{x_{1}^{(i)}\in M_S,x_{2}^{(i)}\in M_I}{\mathop{\min }}} \!\!\! d(\mbf{x}_i) \right).
\end{align}
The simplifications to~\eqref{eq:ML_estimate_max_log} will become evident in the receiver implementation Section~\ref{s:implementation}. As seen from \eqref{eq:ML_estimate_max_log}, the modulation classification metric is sum over the set of tones, $N$, over which the co-scheduled user is stationary, of the Euclidean distance between the received vector and the symbol 2-tuple $\bigl[ x_{1}^{(i)}\, x_{2}^{(i)} \bigr]^T$.
Once the co-scheduled user's constellation, $\hat{M}_I$, is estimated, then the LLR of the $\nth{j}$ bit of the desired user QAM symbol $x^{(i)}_1$ using the max-log-MAP approximation is given by \cite{2006_Fitz
\begin{equation}\label{eq:final_LLR}
\Lambda \left( b_{ij} \right) \!=\!
\underset{x_{1}^{(i)}\in M^{(-1)}_S,x_{2}^{(i)}\in \hat{M}_I}{\mathop{\min }}
d(\mbf{x}_i) - \!\!\underset{x_{1}^{(i)}\in M^{(+1)}_S,x_{2}^{(i)}\in \hat{M}_I}{\mathop{\min }} d(\mbf{x}_i),
\end{equation
where $M^{(+1)}_S$ and $M^{(-1)}_S$ are defined in Section \ref{s:linear_mmse}. As seen from \eqref{eq:final_LLR}, computing the LLRs involves the same Euclidean distance computations as those needed for the co-scheduler user's constellation estimation in \eqref{eq:ML_estimate_max_log}. This fact will be exploited in the hardware implementation in the joint constellation classification and data detection.
\section{MU-MIMO Receiver Hardware Implementation}\label{s:implementation} \vspace{-0.05in}
Figure~\ref{f:architecture} shows an optimized architecture for a $2\!\times\! 2$ MU-MIMO detector, constructed using an ML MIMO detector as its core. The MIMO detector detects the received signal $\mbf{y}_i$ assuming all 4 possible choices of the interferer's constellation. It generates 4 corresponding lists of minimum distance metrics $d(\mbf{x}_i)$ and their associated symbol vectors $\mbf{x}_i$ for all the $\abs{M_I}$ possible hypothesis of interfering user constellation, with $x_1^{(i)}\!\in\!M_S$. These distances and symbols are stored in four buffers each of size $\abs{M_S}$ as shown in the figure.
For each tone to be detected, the minimum distance from each list is passed to an adder that accumulates the minimum distances over a span of $N$ tones, during which the interferer modulation is assumed to be static. The resulting 4 minimum accumulated distances for each interferer hypothesis are stored in a buffer. The minimum from this buffer is used to identify the interferer's constellation, and the corresponding stored distances in the buffers are selected and forwarded for LLR processing according to~\eqref{eq:final_LLR}.
Note that since the interferer's modulation constellation remains static over $N$ tones for a duration of 1 subframe in LTE (14 OFDM symbols), the particular choice of $N\!=\!12$ results in substantial savings in computations. The detector only needs to run in the above mode to identify the interferer's constellation for one OFDM symbol in the subframe. It can then switch to back to normal ML detection mode (without modulation classification) to generate the LLRs for the remaining 13 OFDM symbols for the user of interest $x_1^{(i)}$.
Taking the LTE scenario for hardware complexity analysis, the total number of possible tones in 1 PRB in a subframe is $12\!\times\!14\!=\!168$. Of these tones, 28 are reserved for pilots (for cell specific reference signals and for UE specific pilots to support the MU-MIMO transmission mode), and 140 for data. In the hardware architecture of Fig. \ref{f:architecture}, the total number of distance computations needed to generate the LLRs from these 140 data tones is $140\!\times\!\abs{M_S}$. This corresponds to an increase of only $22.8\%$ compared to the distances computed by an ML detector with perfect knowledge of the interferer.
\begin{figure}[t]
\centering
\includegraphics[scale=1.3]{MU_MIMO_core}
\caption{Architecture for a $2\times 2$ MU-MIMO detector}
\label{f:architecture}
\end{figure}
\section{Simulation Results}\label{s:sim}
The performance of the null projection method of Section \ref{s:linear_const_det} is compared to the proposed method of Section \ref{s:proposed_scheme}. We simulate the probability of correctly detecting the constellation size of the interfering user for different desired and interfering constellation sizes. The received desired user power is assumed to be equal to the received interfering user's power, i.e. the signal-to-interference ratio (SIR) is \unit[0]{dB}. The channel is generated as a zero-mean complex Gaussian circularly symmetric with unit variance, independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) tone-to-tone. Figures~\ref{f:fading_scenario_sig_4QAM_diffInterfConst} and~\ref{f:fading_scenario_sig_64QAM_diffInterfConst} show the results for $M_S\!=\!4$-QAM and $64$-QAM respectively, with $M_I \!=\! \text{4-,16-,64-QAM}$ using $N\!=\!24$ resource elements. The figures show that the ML classification method has a \unit[5]{dB} gain over the nulling approach for $M_S \!=\! 4$-QAM and \unit[2]{dB} gain in the case of $M_S \!=\! 64$-QAM. Therefore, the gain of the ML classification method is largest for small constellation sizes of the desired signal, i,e. the largest gain is attained when the receiver complexity is minimal.
Next, the performance of the ML modulation constellation classification scheme for different values of $N$ is investigated. In Fig.~\ref{f:fading_scenario_sig_16QAM_diffInterfConst_N_12vs24} we compare the constellation size detection performance with $N = 1$ (i.e. a single resource element), $12$ and $24$ for $\abs{M_S} \!=\! 4$ and different interference constellation sizes. Figure \ref{f:fading_scenario_sig_16QAM_diffInterfConst_N_12vs24} shows that $N \!=\! 12$ resource elements are adequate for robust detection of the interferer's constellation size. This will be exploited later in the receiver architecture to reduce computational complexity and memory requirements.
Remark: It could be said that increasing $N$ should always improves the performance due to better noise averaging. However, from~\eqref{eq:ML_estimate_max_log}, we find that, in addition to noise, we have residual errors in the minimization of the quadratic term in~\eqref{eq:ML_estimate_max_log}. This residual error occurs when the $\mbf{x}_{i}$ that minimizes the quadratic term is different from the originally transmitted $\mbf{x}$. The main reason for these errors is that the noise exceeds the minimum distance of the lattice constructed by the set of all symbol vectors $\mbf{x}_i$. Interestingly, we notice that the detection performance with $N = 1$ is better than that with $N = 12$ and 24 for very low SNR. This can be explained by the fact that adding more samples (increasing $N$) would add more noise than signal when the SNR is very low. Hence, it would be better if fewer samples are used for the detection.
The BLER performance of the various receivers are compared when both users use $64$-QAM, with the turbo code of \cite{LTE_36.212} and encoding rate $1/2$ using block size $6144$ bits. Figure~\ref{f:BLER_PEDB} shows the results for the case of the pedestrian-B (Ped-B) multi-path channel model with no antenna correlations \cite{PedB_ChannelModel}. Figure~\ref{f:BLER_PEDB} shows that the joint ML classification and detection method is about \unit[0.1]{dB} away from having perfect knowledge of the co-scheduled user constellation. The ML method has about \unit[1.5]{dB} and \unit[1]{dB} gain over the nulling method for $N\!=\!12$ and $N\!=\!24$, respectively. The MMSE method that does not require the estimation of the co-scheduled user constellation but only its channel, has about \unit[1]{dB} degradation over the ML method. We simulated the impact of antenna correlation on the BLER performance of these receivers. The pedestrian-A (Ped-A)~\cite{PedB_ChannelModel} multi-path channel model with high antenna correlations, where both transmit and receive correlation coefficients are 0.9 is considered. The effective channel matrix is given by $\mbf{H}=\mbf{R}^{1/2}_t \mbf{H}_c \mbf{R}^{1/2}_r$, where $\mbf{H}_c$ is channel whose entries are uncorrelated and generated according to the Ped-A model, $\mbf{R}_t$ and $\mbf{R}_r$ are the transmit and receive antenna $2\!\times\!2$ correlation matrices, respectively, which have $1$ on the diagonal entries and $0.9$ on the off-diagonal. As seen in Fig. \ref{f:BLER_EPA}, the nulling and MMSE methods have significant performance degradation as compared to the joint ML method.
\section{Conclusions}\label{s:conclusion}
A receiver for MU-MIMO transmission in the context of OFDM where two users share the same time and frequency resources has been developed. This receiver is based on the joint ML modulation classification of the co-scheduled user and data detection which outperforms linear receiver approaches. It has been shown that using the max-log-MAP approximation, the decision metric for the modulation classification is an accumulation over a set of tones of the Euclidean distance metrics which is also used in the detector for LLR computations. An efficient hardware architecture emerges that exploits this commonality between the modulation classification and data detection steps and results in a sharing of hardware resources.
\newpage
\bibliographystyle{IEEEtran}
|
\section{Introduction}
Given a permutation $w \in S_n$, consider a generic\footnote{Having its nonzero entries algebraically independent, say.} $n \times 2n$ matrix $M_w$ whose nonzero entries in row $i$ are in columns $[w(i), i+n]$. Here $[a,b]$ denotes $\{a, a+1, \ldots, b\}$ for integers $a$ and $b$; we will also write $[n]$ for $[1,n]$. For example,
\begin{equation*}
M_{2143} = \begin{bmatrix}
0 & * & * & * & * & 0 & 0 & 0\\
* & * & * & * & * & * & 0 & 0\\
0 & 0 & 0 & * & * & * & * & 0\\
0 & 0 & * & * & * & * & * & *
\end{bmatrix}.
\end{equation*}
Let $\P_w$ be the set of bases of the matroid associated to $M_w$. That is, $\P_w$ is the set of $I \in {[2n] \choose n}$ such that the $n \times n$ minor of $M_w$ in columns $I$ is nonzero.
The matroid $\P_w$ belongs to (at least) two interesting classes of matroids. First, it is a \emph{transversal matroid}; see \cite{bonin-transversal-matroids} for an introduction. Take a collection $A = \{A_1, \ldots, A_n\}$ of finite sets. A \emph{transversal} of $A$ is a set $\{x_1, \ldots, x_n\}$ such that $x_i \in A_i$ for each $i$ and all the $x_i$ are distinct. The set of all transversals of $A$ is the set of bases for a matroid. Indeed, if $M_A$ is a generic matrix with $n$ rows whose nonzero entries in row $i$ are in columns $A_i$, then the matroid of $M_A$ is exactly the transversal matroid of $A$. Thus, $M_w$ is the transversal matroid of the set collection $\{[w(i), i+n] : 1 \leq i \leq n\}$.
Second, $\P_w$ is a \emph{positroid}: the matroid of a real matrix whose maximal minors are all nonnegative. Given a rank $k$ positroid $P$ on $[N]$, Knutson, Lam, and Speyer considered the closure of the locus in the complex Grassmannian $\operatorname{Gr}(k, N)$ of $k$-planes having matroid $P$ with respect to a fixed basis \cite{positroidjuggling}. Among other nice properties, these \emph{positroid varieties} turn out to be exactly the images of Richardson varieties in the complete flag variety under projection $\operatorname{Fl}(N) \twoheadrightarrow \operatorname{Gr}(k,N)$.
Given any set of intervals $S = \{[a_1, b_1], \ldots, [a_k, b_k]\}$ in $[N]$, taking the rowspans of matrices of the form $M_S$ gives a subset of $\operatorname{Gr}(k,n)$ whose closure is an irreducible variety called a \emph{rank variety}. Billey and Coskun showed that rank varieties are exactly the images of Richardson varieties in the partial flag variety under projection $\operatorname{Fl}(1,2,\ldots,k; \mathbb{C}^n) \twoheadrightarrow \operatorname{Gr}(k,N)$ \cite{rank-varieties}. Thus, every rank variety is a positroid variety. In particular, $\P_w$ is a positroid.
Our main results concern the size and structure of $\P_w$. An \emph{anti-fixed point} of $w \in S_n$ is a number $i \in [n]$ such that $w(i) = n-i+1$. Define a permutation statistic
\begin{equation*}
g(w) = C_{\ell_1+1} \cdots C_{\ell_k+1},
\end{equation*}
where $\ell_1, \ldots, \ell_k$ are the lengths of the maximal runs of consecutive anti-fixed points in $w$, and $C_j$ is the $j$th Catalan number.
\begin{thm} \label{thm:Pw-formula}
For any $w \in S_n$, $\P_w$ has size $\displaystyle \sum_{\substack{v \geq w \\ \text{$v$ avoids $123$}}} g(v)$, where $\geq$ is strong Bruhat order.
\end{thm}
Here, a permutation \emph{avoids} $123$ if it has no (not necessarily consecutive) increasing subsequence of length $3$. In the special case that $w = w_0 = n(n-1)\cdots 1$, Theorem~\ref{thm:Pw-formula} reads $\#\P_{w_0} = C_{n+1}$. In fact, $\P_{w_0}$ is isomorphic to the rank $n+1$ Catalan matroid $\mathcal{C}_{n+1}$ considered by Ardila, whose bases are the Dyck paths of length $2n+2$, each path viewed as the set of its upsteps \cite{catalan-matroid}. Theorem~\ref{thm:Pw-formula} arises from a stronger structural result for $\P_w$ (cf. Theorem~\ref{thm:matroid-structure} below).
\begin{thm} \label{thm:Pw-structure} There is a partition of ${[2n] \choose n}$ into sets $\mathbb{Q}_v$ indexed by $123$-avoiding permutations $v$ such that for any $w \in S_n$,
\begin{itemize}
\item $\P_w$ is the (disjoint) union $\displaystyle \bigcup_{\substack{v \geq w \\ \text{$v$ avoids $123$}}} \mathbb{Q}_v$
\item If $v$ has runs of consecutive anti-fixed points of lengths $\ell_1, \ldots, \ell_k$, then $\mathbb{Q}_v$ is isomorphic to a direct sum of the Catalan matroids $\mathcal{C}_{\ell_1+1}, \ldots, \mathcal{C}_{\ell_r+1}$ plus a matroid with one basis. In particular, $\#\mathbb{Q}_v = g(v)$.
\end{itemize}
\end{thm}
In Section~\ref{sec:standardization}, we use a bijection of Krattenthaler between 123-avoiding permutations and Dyck paths to prove Theorem~\ref{thm:Pw-formula} in the case where $w$ is the identity permutation. This special case will be useful in proving Theorem~\ref{thm:Pw-structure}, which we do in Section~\ref{sec:Pw-structure}. In Section~\ref{sec:tutte-polynomial}, we give a formula for the Tutte polynomial of $\P_w$ along the lines of Theorem~\ref{thm:Pw-formula}. Section~\ref{sec:diagram-matroids} concludes with some conjectures about a related family of matroids also indexed by permutations.
\subsection*{Acknowledgements}
I would like to thank Sara Billey, Zach Hamaker, Vic Reiner, Jose Samper, Jair Taylor, and Alex Woo for helpful comments and discussions.
\section{Standardizing lattice paths to Dyck paths}
\label{sec:standardization}
Given a positive integer $n$, a \emph{Dyck path} of length $2n$ is a lattice path from $(0,0)$ to $(2n,0)$ which only uses steps $(1,1)$ (\emph{up-steps}) or $(1,-1)$ (\emph{down-steps}), and which never goes below the line $y = 0$. Let $\mathcal{D}_n$ be the set of Dyck paths of length $2n$---it is well-known that $\#\mathcal{D}_n$ is the $n$th Catalan number $C_n$, and that this is also the number of $123$-avoiding permutations in $S_n$.
If $w \in S_{2n}$ is the identity permutation, then $\P_w = {[2n] \choose n}$. In this case, Theorem~\ref{thm:Pw-formula} reads
\begin{equation} \label{eq:123-avoiding-identity}
\sum_{\substack{v \in S_n\\ \text{$v$ avoids $123$}}} C_{\ell_1+1}\cdots C_{\ell_k+1} = {2n \choose n},
\end{equation}
where $\ell_1, \ldots, \ell_k$ are the lengths of runs of anti-fixed points of each $v$.
Here is a similar identity for Dyck paths. We can view any $I \in {[2n] \choose n}$ as a lattice path from $(0,0)$ to $(2n,0)$ by taking one step for each $i = 1, 2, \ldots, 2n$, either $(1,1)$ or $(1,-1)$ depending on whether $i \in I$ or $i \notin I$. We say such a lattice path has a \emph{peak} at step $i$ if step $i$ is an up-step and step $i+1$ is a down-step. The \emph{height} of an up-step $i$ (or a peak at $i$) in a Dyck path is the $y$-coordinate of its endpoint; that is, the number of up-steps (weakly) before $i$ minus the number of down-steps before $i$. By the height of a peak $i$ we will mean the height of the corresponding up-step.
\begin{defn}
A \emph{saw} in a lattice path is a maximal consecutive sequence of height $1$ peaks.
\end{defn}
Here ``consecutive'' means what it should for peaks, that the corresponding step indices are separated by $2$. The following identity will be the Dyck path analogue of \eqref{eq:123-avoiding-identity}.
\begin{lem} \label{lem:saw-identity} For any $n$,
\begin{equation*}
\sum_{D \in \mathcal{D}_n} C_{\ell_1+1}\cdots C_{\ell_k+1} = {2n \choose n},
\end{equation*}
where $2\ell_1, \ldots, 2\ell_k$ are the lengths of the saws of each Dyck path $D$.
\end{lem}
This identity is not hard to prove. Suppose $I \in {[2n] \choose n}$ is a lattice path. The \emph{standardization} of $I$ is the Dyck path $\operatorname{st}(I)$ obtained by replacing each maximal segment of $I$ below the $x$-axis with a saw of the same length.
\begin{ex}
If $n = 9$ and $I = \{1,5,6,7,9,10,14,16,17\}$, or
\begin{center}
\begin{tikzpicture}[scale=.3]
\tikzstyle{pathnode} = [minimum size=1.1mm, inner sep=0pt, fill, circle]
\draw[red, ultra thick] (2, 0) node {} -- (3, -1) node[pathnode] {} -- (4, -2) node[pathnode] {} -- (5, -1) node[pathnode] {} -- (6, 0) node {};
\draw (0,0) node[pathnode] {} -- (1, 1) node[pathnode] {} -- (2, 0) node[pathnode] {};
\draw[red, ultra thick] (12, 0) node {} -- (13, -1) node[pathnode] {} -- (14, 0) node {};
\draw[red, ultra thick] (14, 0) node {} -- (15, -1) node[pathnode] {} -- (16, 0) node {};
\draw (6, 0) node[pathnode] {} -- (7, 1) node[pathnode] {} -- (8, 0) node[pathnode] {} -- (9, 1) node[pathnode] {} -- (10, 2) node[pathnode] {} -- (11, 1) node[pathnode] {} -- (12, 0) node[pathnode] {};
\draw (14, 0) node[pathnode] {};
\draw (16, 0) node[pathnode] {} -- (17, 1) node[pathnode] {} -- (18, 0) node[pathnode] {};
\end{tikzpicture}
\end{center}
then $\operatorname{st}(I)$ is
\begin{center}
\begin{tikzpicture}[scale=.3]
\tikzstyle{pathnode} = [minimum size=1.1mm, inner sep=0pt, fill, circle]
\draw[red, ultra thick] (2, 0) node {} -- (3, 1) node[pathnode] {} -- (4, 0) node[pathnode] {} -- (5, 1) node[pathnode] {} -- (6, 0) node {};
\draw[red, ultra thick] (12, 0) node {} -- (13, 1) node[pathnode] {} -- (14, 0) node {};
\draw[red, ultra thick] (14, 0) node {} -- (15, 1) node[pathnode] {} -- (16, 0) node {};
\draw (0,0) node[pathnode] {} -- (1, 1) node[pathnode] {} -- (2, 0) node[pathnode] {};
\draw (6, 0) node[pathnode] {} -- (7, 1) node[pathnode] {} -- (8, 0) node[pathnode] {} -- (9, 1) node[pathnode] {} -- (10, 2) node[pathnode] {} -- (11, 1) node[pathnode] {} -- (12, 0) node[pathnode] {};
\draw (14, 0) node[pathnode] {};
\draw (16, 0) node[pathnode] {} -- (17, 1) node[pathnode] {} -- (18, 0) node[pathnode] {};
\end{tikzpicture}
\end{center}
where we have indicated maximal segments below the $x$-axis and their replacements in $\operatorname{st}(I)$ with bold red.
\end{ex}
\begin{proof}[Proof of Lemma~\ref{lem:saw-identity}]
Suppose $D \in \mathcal{D}_n$ is a Dyck path with saws of lengths $2\ell_1, \ldots, 2\ell_k$. The set $\operatorname{st}^{-1}(D)$ then has size $C_{\ell_1+1} \cdots C_{\ell_k+1}$. Indeed, the members of $\operatorname{st}^{-1}(D)$ are obtained from $D$ by replacing each saw of length $2\ell_i$ with any lattice path of the same length which starts and ends on the $x$-axis and stays below $y = 1$. Prepending a down-step and appending an up-step shows that such lattice paths are in bijection with Dyck paths of length $2\ell_i + 2$. Thus Lemma~\ref{lem:saw-identity} reflects the partition of ${[2n] \choose n}$ into the fibers of the standardization map.
\end{proof}
To prove \eqref{eq:123-avoiding-identity}, then, we need a bijection from $123$-avoiding permutations to Dyck paths which turns anti-fixed points into peaks of height $1$. It turns out that Krattenthaler has defined a bijection which does the trick \cite{krattenthaler-123-avoiding-dyck-path-bijection}. For the moment, view Dyck paths as proceeding from the southwest corner of the square $[n] \times [n]$ to the northeast, and remaining above the southwest-northeast diagonal. There is a partial order on Dyck paths where $D_1 \leq D_2$ if $D_1$ lies between $D_2$ and the diagonal of the square. Draw the graph of a $123$-avoiding $w$ in $[n] \times [n]$, i.e. the set of cells $\{(i, w(i)) : i \in [1,n]\}$. Then the Dyck path $K(w)$ corresponding to $w$ is the reverse of the minimal Dyck path which is northwest of the graph of $w$.
\begin{ex}
Say $w = 6475312$. The graph of $w$ is represented using $\times$'s, while $K(w)$ is the path in bold:
\begin{center}
\begin{tikzpicture}[scale=.35]
\draw (0,0) -- (7,0);
\draw (0,1) -- (7,1);
\draw (0,2) -- (7,2);
\draw (0,3) -- (7,3);
\draw (0,4) -- (7,4);
\draw (0,5) -- (7,5);
\draw (0,6) -- (7,6);
\draw (0,7) -- (7,7);
\draw (0,0) -- (0,7);
\draw (1,0) -- (1,7);
\draw (2,0) -- (2,7);
\draw (3,0) -- (3,7);
\draw (4,0) -- (4,7);
\draw (5,0) -- (5,7);
\draw (6,0) -- (6,7);
\draw (7,0) -- (7,7);
\node at (5.5, 6.5) {$\times$};
\node at (3.5, 5.5) {$\times$};
\node at (6.5, 4.5) {$\times$};
\node at (4.5, 3.5) {$\times$};
\node at (2.5, 2.5) {$\times$};
\node at (0.5, 1.5) {$\times$};
\node at (1.5, 0.5) {$\times$};
\draw[very thick] (0,0) -- (0,2) -- (2,2) -- (2,3) -- (3,3) -- (3,6) -- (5,6) -- (5,7) -- (7,7);
\end{tikzpicture} \qquad
\raisebox{1.1cm}{$\leadsto \qquad K(w) = $ \begin{tikzpicture}[scale=0.3]
\tikzstyle{pathnode} = [minimum size=1.1mm, inner sep=0pt, fill, circle]
\draw (0,0) node[pathnode] {} -- (1, 1) node[pathnode] {} -- (2, 2) node[pathnode] {} -- (3, 1) node[pathnode] {} -- (4, 2) node[pathnode] {} -- (5, 3) node[pathnode] {} -- (6, 2) node[pathnode] {} -- (7, 1) node[pathnode] {} -- (8, 0) node[pathnode] {} -- (9, 1) node[pathnode] {} -- (10, 0) node[pathnode] {} -- (11, 1) node[pathnode] {} -- (12, 2) node[pathnode] {} -- (13, 1) node[pathnode] {} -- (14, 0) node[pathnode] {};
\end{tikzpicture}}
\end{center}
\end{ex}
$K(w)$ is determined by the entries weakly above the southwest-northeast diagonal of the graph of $w$. These are exactly the \emph{left-to-right minima} of $w$: positions $i$ such that $j < i$ implies $w(i) < w(j)$. Likewise, the entries weakly below the SW-NE diagonal are the \emph{right-to-left maxima}: positions $i$ such that $j > i$ implies $w(i) > w(j)$.
\begin{lem}
Say $w \in S_n$ avoids $123$ and $j \in [1,n]$. Then $j$ is a left-to-right minimum if and only if $w(j) \leq n-j+1$, a right-to-left maximum if and only if $w(j) \geq n-j+1$, and an anti-fixed point if and only if it is both.
\end{lem}
\begin{proof}
Suppose $w(j) \leq n-j+1$ but $j$ is not a left-to-right minimum, so there is $i < j$ with $w(i) < w(j)$. Since $w$ avoids $123$, every $k$ such that $w(j) < w(k)$ must be in $[j] \setminus \{i\}$. But there are at least $j$ such values of $k$, so this is impossible by the pigeonhole principle. Likewise, if $w(j) \geq n-j+1$, then $j$ is a right-to-left maximum. Every entry of $w$ is either a left-to-right minimum or a right-to-left maximum (a counterexample would yield a $123$ pattern), so the converses hold as well.
\end{proof}
So, we can describe $K(w)$ as follows. Say $i_1 < \cdots < i_k$ are the left-to-right minima of $w$. Also define $w(i_0) = n+1 = i_{k+1}$. Using $U$ for an up-step and $D$ for a down-step, the Dyck path $K(w)$ is then
\begin{equation*}
U^{w(i_0) - w(i_1)} D^{i_2 - i_1} U^{w(i_1) - w(i_2)} D^{i_3 - i_2} \cdots U^{w(i_{k-1}) - w(i_k)} D^{i_{k+1} - i_k}.
\end{equation*}
From this description it is easy to see that left-to-right minima of $w$ correspond to peaks of $K(w)$, and anti-fixed points to peaks of height $1$. Thus, applying $K$ to Lemma~\ref{lem:saw-identity} gives the identity \eqref{eq:123-avoiding-identity}.
\begin{lem} \label{lem:peak-height}
Suppose $w \in S_n$ avoids $123$. Then $j$ is a left-to-right minimum of $w$ if and only if $K(w)$ has a peak at $n-w(j)+j$, and this peak has height $n+2-w(j)-j$.
\end{lem}
\begin{cor} If $w$ avoids $123$ and has runs of anti-fixed points of lengths $\ell_1, \ldots, \ell_k$, then $K(w)$ has saws of lengths $2\ell_1, \ldots, 2\ell_k$.
\end{cor}
\begin{cor} \label{cor:123-avoiding-identity} For any $n$,
\begin{equation*}
\sum_{\substack{v \in S_n\\ \text{$v$ avoids $123$}}} C_{\ell_1+1}\cdots C_{\ell_k+1} = {2n \choose n},
\end{equation*}
where $\ell_1, \ldots, \ell_k$ are the lengths of runs of anti-fixed points of each $v$.
\end{cor}
\section{The structure of $\P_w$}
\label{sec:Pw-structure}
Ardila has shown that the set
\begin{equation*}
\mathcal{C}_n = \{\text{up-steps of $D$} : D \in \mathcal{D}_n\}
\end{equation*}
is the set of bases of a matroid, the \emph{Catalan matroid} of rank $n$ \cite{catalan-matroid}. He also showed that $\mathcal{C}_{n+1}$ is represented by a generic $(n+1) \times 2(n+1)$ matrix of the form
\begin{equation*}
A_{n+1} = \begin{bmatrix}
* & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & \cdots & 0 & 0 & 0\\
* & * & * & 0 & 0 & \cdots & 0 & 0 & 0\\
* & * & * & * & * & \cdots & 0 & 0 & 0\\
\vdots & \vdots & \vdots & \vdots & \vdots & \ddots & \vdots & \vdots & \vdots\\
* & * & * & * & * & \cdots & * & * & 0
\end{bmatrix}
\end{equation*}
That is, the $n$-subsets of $[2n]$ where this matrix has invertible $n\times n$ minors are exactly $\mathcal{C}_n$.
Write $\P_n$ for $\P_{w_0}$ where $w_0 \in S_n$. Then $\P_n$ is represented by the $n \times 2n$ matrix
\begin{equation*}
M_{w_0} = \begin{bmatrix}
0 & 0 & \cdots & 0 & * & * & 0 & \cdots & 0 & 0\\
\vdots & \vdots & \cdots & * & * & * & * & \cdots & \vdots & 0\\
0 & 0 & \iddots & * & * & * & * & \ddots & 0 & 0\\
0 & * & \cdots & * & * & * & * & \cdots & * & 0\\
* & * & \cdots & * & * & * & * & \cdots & * & *
\end{bmatrix}
\end{equation*}
Deleting row $1$ and columns $1$ and $2n+2$ of $A_{n+1}$, then permuting columns, gives the matrix $M_{w_0}$. Hence $\P_n$ is isomorphic to $\mathcal{C}_{n+1}$. Specifically, say $\alpha : [2,2n+1] \to [2n]$ is the function sending $2, 3, \ldots, n+1$ to $n+1, n, n+2, n-1, \ldots, 2n, 1$. Then $D \in \mathcal{C}_{n+1}$ if and only if $\alpha(D \setminus 1) \in \P_n$. Since $\mathcal{C}_{n+1}$ is made up of the sets $I \in {[2n+2] \choose n+1}$ such that $\#(I \cap [2j+1]) \geq j+1$ for $0 \leq j \leq n$, this isomorphism gives the following description of $\P_n$.
\begin{lem} \label{lem:reverse-perm-positroid} If $w_0 \in S_n$ is the reverse permutation, $\P_n$ is the set of $I \in {[2n] \choose n}$ such that $\#(I \cap [n-j+1,n-j]) \geq j$ for $1 \leq j \leq n$.
\end{lem}
We will need to consider shifted versions of $\P_n$, for which the following notation will be useful. Given a subset $X = \{x_1 < \cdots < x_k\}$ of $[n]$, write\footnote{Mnemonic: $Z_j X$ is an initial segment of $X$ reflected around the \emph{center} of $[2n]$, but ``$C_j$'' is taken.} $Z_j X$ for
\begin{equation*}
\{n-x_j+1, \ldots, n-x_1+1, n+x_1, \ldots, n+x_j\}
\end{equation*}
(note that $Z_j X$ also depends on $n$, but we suppress that in the notation). Now for an interval $K$ in $[n]$, let $f_{K,n}$ be the unique increasing function $[2\#K] \to Z_{\#K}K$. Finally, define $\P_{K,n}$ to be $f_{K,n}(\P_n)$ where $w_0 \in S_{\#K}$. For example, $\P_{[3,4],7}$ is the matroid of a generic matrix
\begin{equation*} \left[
\begin{array}{cccccccccccccc}
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & * & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & * & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0\\
0 & 0 & 0 & * & * & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & * & * & 0 & 0 & 0
\end{array} \right].
\end{equation*}
Alternatively, we can give a description in the style of Lemma~\ref{lem:reverse-perm-positroid}: $\P_{K,n}$ consists of the $\#K$-subsets $I$ of $Z_{\#K} K$ such that
\begin{equation*}
\#(I \cap Z_j K) \geq j
\end{equation*}
for each $j$ in $[\#K]$.
Let $L(w)$ be the set of left-to-right minima of $w$ which are not right-to-left maxima, and $R(w)$ the set of right-to-left maxima which are not left-to-right minima. We can now state our main structural result for $\P_w$.
\begin{thm} \label{thm:matroid-structure} Say $v, w \in S_n$.
\begin{enumerate}[(a)]
\item If $v \leq w$ in Bruhat order, then $\P_w \subseteq \P_v$.
\item The sets $\mathbb{Q}_w = \P_w \setminus \bigcup_{v > w} \P_v$ are pairwise disjoint.
\item If $w$ contains $123$, then $\mathbb{Q}_w$ is empty.
\item If $w$ avoids $123$, say $w$ has runs of anti-fixed points $A_1, \ldots, A_k$. Then
\begin{equation*}
\mathbb{Q}_w = \bigoplus_{i=1}^k \P_{A_i, n} \oplus \{w(L(w))\} \oplus \{n + R(w)\}.
\end{equation*}
\end{enumerate}
\end{thm}
Here, for two families of sets $\mathcal{F}$ and $\mathcal{G}$, $\mathcal{F} \oplus \mathcal{G}$ is the family
\begin{equation*}
\{I \sqcup J : I \in \mathcal{F}, J \in \mathcal{G}\},
\end{equation*}
where $\sqcup$ is disjoint union. That is, if $\mathcal{F}$ and $\mathcal{G}$ are sets of bases for two matroids, then $\mathcal{F} \oplus \mathcal{G}$ is the set of bases for the direct sum of the two matroids. Also, for a set $A$ and integer $n$, $n + A$ means $\{i + n : i \in A\}$.
We can describe $\mathbb{Q}_w$ directly in terms of matrices. For $w$ avoiding $123$, let $N_w$ be a generic matrix whose entries are zero except that
\begin{itemize}
\item the entries $(i, w(i))$ for $i \in L(w)$ are nonzero;
\item the entries $(i, i+n)$ for $i \in R(w)$ are nonzero; and
\item if $w$ has runs of anti-fixed points starting at $a_1, \ldots, a_k$ with lengths $\ell_1, \ldots, \ell_k$, then for each $p$ the submatrix in rows $[a_p, a_p+\ell_p-1]$ and columns $f_{a_p, \ell_p, n}([1, 2\ell_p])$ is $M_{w_0}$, where $w_0 \in S_{\ell_p}$.
\end{itemize}
Then $\mathbb{Q}_w$ is the matroid of $N_w$.
\begin{rem} \label{rem:Qw-description}
We can also describe $\mathbb{Q}_w$ in the manner of Lemma~\ref{lem:reverse-perm-positroid}. Let $A$ be the set of anti-fixed points of $w$, and define
\begin{equation*}
G(w) = w(L(w) \cup A) \cup ((R(w) \cup A) + n = w(L(w)) \cup (R(w) + n) \cup Z_{\#A}A.
\end{equation*}
This is the groundset of $\mathbb{Q}_w$. Now $\mathbb{Q}_w$ consists of the $n$-subsets $I$ of $G(w)$ such that for each maximal interval $K \subseteq A$,
\begin{equation}
\#(I \cap Z_j K) \geq j
\end{equation}
for $1 \leq j \leq \#K$. Notice that this implies (but is not equivalent to) $\#(I \cap Z_j A) \geq j$ for all $j$, or $\#(I \cap Z_j(A \cap [j])) \geq \#(A \cap [j])$.
\end{rem}
\begin{ex}
Take $w = 645312$, which avoids $123$. The runs of anti-fixed points occur in positions $1$ and $4$, and
\begin{equation*}
L(w) = \{2,5\}, \qquad R(w) = \{6,3\}.
\end{equation*}
Hence
\begin{equation*}
\mathbb{Q}_w = \P_{[1,1], 6} \oplus \P_{[4,4], 6} \oplus \{\{4,1\}\} \oplus \{\{12,9\}\}.
\end{equation*}
We have $\P_{[1,1],6} = \{\{6\}, \{7\}\}$ and $\P_{[4,4],6} = \{\{3\}, \{10\}\}$. So, $\mathbb{Q}_w$ consists of the four sets
\begin{equation*}
13469(12),\quad 13479(12),\quad 1469(10)(12),\quad 1479(10)(12).
\end{equation*}
\end{ex}
Because $\P_w$ is the disjoint union of $\mathbb{Q}_v$ for all $123$-avoiding $v \geq w$, and $\#\P_{K, n} = C_{\#K+1}$, we get an immediate enumerative corollary.
\begin{cor} The size of $\P_w$ is
\begin{equation*}
\sum_{\substack{v \geq w\\ \text{$v$ avoids $123$}}} C_{\ell_1+1} \cdots C_{\ell_k+1},
\end{equation*}
where $\ell_1, \ldots, \ell_k$ are as in the statement of Theorem~\ref{thm:matroid-structure}, the lengths of the runs of anti-fixed points in each $v$.
\end{cor}
To prove Theorem~\ref{thm:matroid-structure}, we begin with a characterization of positroids from \cite{oh-positroid-characterization}. Suppose $f$ is an affine permutation, that is, a bijection $f : \mathbb{Z} \to \mathbb{Z}$ such that $f(i+n) = f(i)+n$ for some fixed $n$ (the \emph{quasiperiod} of $f$) and all $i \in \mathbb{Z}$. Notice that an affine permutation is determined completely by the sequence $f(1), f(2), \ldots, f(n)$, and we will write our affine permutations this way. For example, $4721$ sends an integer $4k+1$ to $4k+4$, $4k+2$ to $4k+7$, and so on.
An affine permutation $f$ is \emph{bounded} if $i \leq f(i) \leq n+i$ for each $i \in \mathbb{Z}$. Postnikov showed, in the slightly different but equivalent language of decorated permutations, that rank $k$ positroids on $[n]$ are indexed by bounded affine permutations $f$ with quasiperiod $n$ and for which exactly $k$ of the values $f(1), \ldots, f(n)$ exceed $n$ \cite{postnikov-positroids}.
Suppose $f$ is a such a bounded affine permutation, and that exactly $k$ of the values $f(1), \ldots, f(n)$ exceed $n$. The \emph{juggling sequence} of $f$ is the sequence $(J_1, \ldots, J_n)$ of $k$-subsets of $[n]$ given by
\begin{equation*}
J_i = \{f(j) - i + 1 : j < i\} \cap \mathbb{N}.
\end{equation*}
Finally, let $\chi$ be the shift permutation $23\cdots n1 \in S_n$.
\begin{defn} \label{def:positroid}
The \emph{positroid} associated to $f$ is the matroid on $[n]$ with bases
\begin{equation} \label{eq:positroid-characterization}
\left\{I \in {[n] \choose k} : \chi^{-i+1} I \geq J_i \text{ for all $i = 1, \ldots, n$}\right\}.
\end{equation}
\end{defn}
For more on positroids, see \cite{positroidjuggling, postnikov-positroids}. (Definition~\ref{def:positroid} is a theorem in \cite{oh-positroid-characterization}, but we will simply take it as our definition of positroid.)
Suppose $w \in S_n$. Section 3 of \cite{pawlowski-liu-conjecture-rank-varieties} shows that our $\P_w$, the matroid of a generic matrix of the form $M_w$, is the positroid associated to the bounded affine permutation $f_w$ with quasiperiod $2n$ defined by
\begin{equation*}
f_w(i) = \begin{cases}
i+n & \text{if $1 \leq i \leq n$}\\
w(i)+2n & \text{if $1 \leq i \leq n$}
\end{cases}.
\end{equation*}
For instance, $f_{2143} = 5678(10)9(12)(11)$.
The juggling sequence $(J_1, \ldots, J_{2n})$ of $f_w$ is easy to describe: $J_1 = \cdots = J_{n+1} = [n]$, while $J_{n+j+1} = [n-j] \cup (w([j]) + n-j)$. This leads to a correspondingly simpler version of the test \eqref{eq:positroid-characterization}. Given $I \in {[2n] \choose n}$ and some $j$, write $\chi^{-n-j}I = \{b_1 < \cdots < b_n\}$, and define $B_j(I) = \{b_{n-j+1}, \ldots, b_n\} - n + j$.
\begin{lem} \label{lem:positroid-simplification-1} A set $I \in {[2n] \choose n}$ is in $\P_w$ if and only if $B_j(I) \geq w([j])$ for $j = 1, \ldots, n$. \end{lem}
\begin{proof}
The test $\chi^{-i+1} I \geq J_i$ is vacuous for $i = 1, \ldots, n+1$ since $J_i = [n]$. If $i = n+j+1$, it reads $\chi^{-n-j}I \geq [n-j] \cup (w([j]) + n-j)$, which is equivalent to $B_j(I) \geq w([j])$.
\end{proof}
In fact, we can do better: it turns out that the sets $B_j(I)$ are nested. Recall the \emph{tableau criterion} for Bruhat order on the symmetric group: $v \geq w$ if and only if $v([j]) \geq w([j])$ for all $j$. The same definition gives a partial order on all injective words on $\mathbb{N}$ of a fixed length, which we will also call Bruhat order. Given
\begin{equation*}
I = \{i_1 < \cdots < i_p \leq n < i_{p+1} < \cdots < i_n\} \in {[2n] \choose n},
\end{equation*}
let $v_I$ be the injective word with $i_{p+1}, \ldots, i_n$ in positions $i_{p+1}-n, \ldots, i_n - n$ (in increasing order), and $i_p, \ldots, i_1$ in the remaining positions (in decreasing order). For example, if $n = 6$ and $I = \{1, 2, 5, 7, 10, 11\}$, then $v_I = 752(10)(11)1$.
\begin{lem} \label{lem:positroid-simplification-2} For any $w \in S_n$ and $I \in {[2n] \choose n}$, $I \in \P_w$ if and only if $v_I \geq w$. \end{lem}
\begin{proof} This will follow from the tableau criterion and Lemma~\ref{lem:positroid-simplification-1} if we show that $B_{j-1}(I) \subseteq B_j(I)$ for each $j$ and that $B_j(I) \setminus B_{j-1}(I) = \{v_I(j)\}$. For each $j \geq 0$, we have
\begin{equation*}
\chi^{-n-j} I = \{i_{p+q(j)} - n < \cdots < i_n - n < i_1 + n < \cdots < i_{p+q(j)-1} + n\} - j,
\end{equation*}
where $q(j) \geq 0$ is such that
\begin{equation*}
i_1 < \cdots < i_{p+q(j)-1} \leq n+j < i_{p+q(j)} < \cdots < i_n.
\end{equation*}
We must have $n-(p+q(j))+1 \leq 2n - (n+j)$, or equivalently $p+q(j)-1 \geq j$. Therefore
\begin{equation} \label{eq:Bj-description}
B_j(I) = \{i_{p+q(j)-j} < \cdots < i_{p+q(j)-1}\}.
\end{equation}
There are two cases now. If $j = i_{p+r} - n$ for some $r \geq 1$, then $q(j) = q(j-1)+1 = r+1$. One can then see from \eqref{eq:Bj-description} that $B_j(I) \subseteq B_{j-1}(I)$ and that
\begin{equation*}
B_j(I) \setminus B_{j-1}(I) = \{i_{p+q(j-1)}\} = \{i_{p+r}\} = \{v_I(j)\}.
\end{equation*}
On the other hand, if $j \notin \{i_{p+1}-n, \ldots, i_n-n\}$ and $j \geq 1$, then $q(j) = q(j-1)$. Again \eqref{eq:Bj-description} shows that $B_j(I) \subseteq B_{j-1}(I)$, and now
\begin{equation*}
B_j(I) \setminus B_{j-1}(I) = \{i_{p+q(j-1)-j}\} = \{i_{p+q(j)-j}\}.
\end{equation*}
Since the sets $B_j(I)$ are nested and get larger by one element with each step, the word formed by the singletons $B_j(I) \setminus B_{j-1}(I)$ must be injective, and its entries are the members of $I$ in some order by \eqref{eq:Bj-description}. We have seen that the entries in positions $\{i_{p+1}-n, \ldots, i_n-n\}$ agree with those for $v_I$. Therefore to show that the remaining entries $i_p, \ldots, i_1$, it suffices to show that they come in decreasing order. This follows from the fact that the function $j \mapsto p+q(j)-j$ is weakly decreasing, since $q(j+1)-q(j) \in \{0,1\}$ for each $j$.
\end{proof}
Lemma~\ref{lem:positroid-simplification-2} says that $\P_w$ is the inverse image in ${[2n] \choose n}$ of the order ideal above $w$ in the poset of length $n$ injective words under the map $I \mapsto v_I$. The following ``dual'' perspective will turn out to be useful. Given a fixed $I \in {[2n] \choose n}$, let $W_I = \{w \in S_n : I \in \P_w\}$. By Lemma~\ref{lem:positroid-simplification-2}, $W_I = \{w \in S_n : v_I \geq w\}$. Notice that part (b) of Theorem~\ref{thm:matroid-structure} is equivalent to the statement that $W_I$ has a unique maximal element. If $v_I$ and $w_0 = n(n-1)\cdots 1$ have a greatest lower bound, it will be the unique maximal element of $W_I$. The poset of injective words with Bruhat order is not a lattice, but it turns out that the greatest lower bound exists in this case.
\begin{lem} \label{lem:word-meet} Let $v$ be an injective word of length $n$ and $w_0 = n(n-1)\cdots 1$. For each $j$, define
\begin{equation*}
s(j) = \#([v(j)] \cap v([j])) = \{1 \leq i \leq j : v(i) \leq v(j)\}.
\end{equation*}
Let $u \in S_n$ be such that $u(j) = v(j)$ if $v(j) \leq n-j + s(j)$, and whose other entries are the other members of $[n]$, in decreasing order. Then $u$ is a greatest lower bound for $v$ and $w_0$ in Bruhat order. \end{lem}
\begin{proof}
Define
\begin{equation*}
E_j = \min(v([j]), w_0([j])) = \{\min(b_1, n-j+1) < \cdots < \min(b_j, n)\},
\end{equation*}
where $v([j]) = \{b_1 < \cdots < b_j\}$. If the sets $E_j$ are nested, the corresponding injective word will be a greatest lower bound for $v$ and $w_0$, so we must show that $E_{j-1} \subseteq E_j$ and $E_j \setminus E_{j-1} = \{u(j)\}$ for each $j$. The proof will be similar to that of Lemma~\ref{lem:positroid-simplification-2}.
For each $j$, take $r(j)$ maximal such that $b_{r(j)} \leq n-j+r(j)$, or $0$ if there is no such $r$. For a fixed $j$, write $v([j-1]) = \{b_1 < \cdots < b_{j-1}\}$. Then
\begin{equation*}
E_{j-1} = \{b_1 < \cdots < b_{r(j-1)} < n-j+r(j-1)+2 < \cdots < n\}.
\end{equation*}
Now we consider two cases.
First, suppose $v(j) \leq n-j+s(j)$. Then $r(j) \geq s(j)$, which implies $r(j) = r(j-1)+1$, and
\begin{align*}
E_j &= \{b_1 < \cdots < b_{s-1} < v(j) < b_s < \cdots < b_{r(j-1)} < n-j + r(j)+1 < \cdots < n\}\\
&= \{b_1 < \cdots < b_{s-1} < v(j) < b_s < \cdots < b_{r(j-1)} < n-j + r(j-1)+2 < \cdots < n\}\\
&= E_{j-1} \cup \{v(j)\}.
\end{align*}
Second, suppose $v(j) > n-j+s(j)$. Then $r(j) \leq s(j)-1$. In this case we have $r(j) \leq r(j-1)$, and if $r(j) < i \leq r(j-1)$, then $b_i = n-j+i+1$. Therefore
\begin{align*}
&E_j = \{b_1 < \cdots < b_{r(j)} < n-j + r(j)+1 < \cdots < n\}\\
&E_{j-1} = \{b_1 < \cdots < b_{r(j)} < n-j+r(j)+2 < \cdots < n\},
\end{align*}
so $E_j = E_{j-1} \cup \{n-j+r(j)+1\}$.
In both cases we see that $E_{j-1} \subseteq E_j$, so the permutation $u$ defined by $E_j \setminus E_{j-1} = \{u(j)\}$ is a greatest upper bound for $w_0$ and $v$. Moreover, if $v(j) \leq n-j+s(j)$, then $u(j) = v(j)$. If $j$ is, on the other hand, such that $v(j) > n-j+s(j)$, then $u(j) = n-j+r(j)+1$; since $r(j)-j$ is a weakly decreasing function, we see that $u$ is weakly decreasing on such positions $j$, as claimed.
\end{proof}
\begin{cor} \label{cor:W_I-max} For any $I \in {[2n] \choose n}$, the set $W_I$ has a unique maximal element $u_I$. \end{cor}
\begin{proof} The unique maximal element of $W_I$ is the greatest lower bound of $v_I$ and $w_0$ given by Lemma~\ref{lem:word-meet}. \end{proof}
\begin{rem} \label{rem:u_I-calc}
Calculating $u_I$ is even simpler than Lemma~\ref{lem:word-meet} might lead one to believe, because the entries of $v_I$ in $[n]$ form a decreasing sequence, so in the case that $v_I(j)\leq n-j+s(j)$, we actually have $s(j) = 1$. Hence $u_I$ is the permutation in $S_n$ such that $u_I(j) = v_I(j)$ when $v_I(j) \leq n-j+1$, and whose other entries form a decreasing subsequence. For example, say $I = \{1, 3, 4, 6, 9, 10, 15, 16, 17\}$. Then $v_I = (10)9643(15)(16)(17)1$ and $u_I = 986437521$. In fact, the next lemma shows that $u_I$ is completely determined by even less information.
\end{rem}
\begin{lem} \label{lem:u_I-vs-v_I}
For any $I \in {[2n] \choose n}$, we have $u_I(j) < n-j+1$ if and only if $v_I(j) < n-j+1$ (and in this case $u_I(j) = v_I(j)$). Moreover, the permutation $u_I$ is uniquely determined by the pairs $(j, v_I(j))$ for which $v_I(j) < n-j+1$.
\end{lem}
\begin{proof}
The description of $u_I$ in Remark~\ref{rem:u_I-calc} shows that $u_I$ is the union of two decreasing subsequences, and so it avoids the pattern $123$. Any $123$-avoiding permutation $z \in S_n$ is completely determined by the pairs $(j, z(j))$ for which $z(j) < n-j+1$, because the other entries will be right-to-left maxima and come in decreasing order. Thus it suffices to prove the first claim.
By Remark~\ref{rem:u_I-calc}, if $v_I(j) < n-j+1$ then $u_I(j) = v_I(j)$. Suppose that $u_I(j) < n-j+1$ but that $u_I(j) \neq v_I(j)$. This implies $v_I(j) > n-j+1$. By the pigeonhole principle, there must be $k > j$ such that $u_I(k) > n-k+1$, and the minimal such $k$ must satisfy $u_I(k) > u_I(j)$. For such a $k$ we have $v_I(k) > n-k+1$. But then the construction of $u_I$ implies that $u_I(j)$ and $u_I(k)$ are part of the same decreasing subsequence. This is a contradiction, since $j < k$ and $u_I(j) < u_I(k)$.
\end{proof}
We now restate and prove Theorem~\ref{thm:matroid-structure}.
\begin{thm*}[Theorem \ref{thm:matroid-structure}] Say $v, w \in S_n$. Then
\begin{enumerate}[(a)]
\item If $v \leq w$ in Bruhat order, then $\P_w \subseteq \P_v$.
\item The sets $\mathbb{Q}_w = \P_w \setminus \bigcup_{v > w} \P_v$ are pairwise disjoint.
\item If $w$ contains $123$, then $\mathbb{Q}_w$ is empty.
\item If $w$ avoids $123$, say $w$ has runs of anti-fixed points $A_1, \ldots, A_k$. Then
\begin{equation} \label{eq:Qw-matroid}
\mathbb{Q}_w = \bigoplus_{i=1}^k \P_{A_i, n} \oplus \{w(L(w))\} \oplus \{n + R(w)\}.
\end{equation}
\end{enumerate}
\end{thm*}
\begin{proof}
\begin{enumerate}[(a)]
\item This follows immediately from Lemma~\ref{lem:positroid-simplification-2}.
\item We have $I \in \mathbb{Q}_w$ if and only if $w$ is a maximal element of $W_I = \{w \in S_n : I \in \P_w\}$. Since Corollary~\ref{cor:W_I-max} says that $W_I$ has a unique maximal element, the sets $\mathbb{Q}_w$ must be pairwise disjoint.
\item Suppose $I \in \mathbb{Q}_w$. As in (b), this is equivalent to $u_I = w$. The description of $u_I$ in Remark~\ref{rem:u_I-calc} shows that $u_I$ is the union of two decreasing subsequences, and so it avoids $123$. (One can also prove this on the level of matrices, by using a $123$ pattern in $w$ and a transversal of $M_w$ in columns $I$ to find some transposition $t$ such that $w \leq wt$ along with a transversal of $M_{wt}$ in columns $I$.)
\item Let $\tilde{\mathbb{Q}}_w$ be the set on the right-hand side of \eqref{eq:Qw-matroid}, and suppose $I \in \tilde{\mathbb{Q}}_w$. Let us see that $w = u_I$, which implies $I \in \mathbb{Q}_w$. By part (c), $u_I$ avoids $123$. As mentioned in the proof of Lemma~\ref{lem:u_I-vs-v_I}, a $123$-avoiding permutation $z$ is completely determined by the pairs $(j, z(j))$ where $z(j) < n-j+1$. Hence, it is enough to show that if $w(j) < n-j+1$ or $u_I(j) < n-j+1$, then $w(j) = u_I(j)$. By Lemma~\ref{lem:u_I-vs-v_I}, this is equivalent to: if $w(j) < n-j+1$ or $v_I(j) < n-j+1$, then $w(j) = v_I(j)$.
Observe that $v_I(j) = k < n-j+1$ if and only if $n+j \notin I$ and $k$ is the $(j-\#(I \cap [n+1,n+j]))^{\text{th}}$ largest element in $I \cap [n]$. Equivalently, $n+j \notin I$ and $\#(I \cap [k,n+j]) = j$. Thus, we want either of $w(j) < n-j+1$ or $v_I(j) < n-j+1$ to imply $n+j \notin I$ and $\#(I \cap [w(j), n+j]) = j$. The first condition is easy: if $n+j \in I$, then (1) $j$ must be a right-to-left maximum of $w$, so $w(j) \geq n-j+1$, and (2) the construction of $v_I$ implies $v_I(j) > n$.
Let $A$ be the set of anti-fixed points of $w$. Recall that $I$ is the disjoint union of $w(L(w))$, $R(w)+n$, and $I \cap Z_{\#A}A$. We treat these three cases separately. First, since $j \in L(w)$, we have
\begin{equation*}
\#(w(L(w)) \cap [w(j), n+j]) = \#(w(L(w)) \cap [w(j), n]) = \#(L(w) \cap [j]).
\end{equation*}
Next,
\begin{equation*}
\#((R(w) + n) \cap [w(j), n+j]) = \#(R(w) \cap [j]).
\end{equation*}
Finally, since $j$ is a left-to-right minimum, $[w(j), n+j] \supseteq [n-j+1, n+j]$, and the description of $\tilde{Q}_w$ given in Remark~\ref{rem:Qw-description} then says that
\begin{equation*}
\#(I \cap Z_{\#A}A \cap [w(j), n+j]) \geq \#(A \cap [j]).
\end{equation*}
Putting these three pieces of $I \cap [w(j), n+j]$ together,
\begin{align*}
\#(I \cap [w(j), n+j])) &\geq \#(L(w) \cap [j]) + \#(R(w) \cap [j]) + \#(I \cap Z_{\#A}A \cap [w(j), n+j])\\
&\geq (j - \#(A \cap [j])) + \#(A \cap [j]) = j.
\end{align*}
For the reverse inequality, we use the easy direction of Hall's marriage theorem. Let $D_i$ be the set of *'s in column $i$ of the matrix $N_w$ representing $\tilde{\mathbb{Q}}_w$. That is,
\begin{equation*}
D_i = \begin{cases}
\{w^{-1}(i)\} & \text{if $i \in w(L(w))$}\\
\{i-n\} & \text{if $i \in R(w)+n$}\\
[a_{\ell}-\ell+k, a_{\ell}] & \text{if $i$ or $2n-i+1$ is $k$th in a run of anti-fixed points $a_1, \ldots, a_{\ell}$}.
\end{cases}
\end{equation*}
Since $N_w$ has a transversal in columns $I$, we must have
\begin{align*}
\#(I \cap [w(j), n+j]) \leq \#\bigcup_{i \in I \cap [w(j), n+j]} D_i.
\end{align*}
Notice that if $w(i) < i' \leq n$ or $n > i' > i+n$, the contents of $D_{i'}$ are bounded above by $i$. Therefore $\bigcup_{i \in I \cap [w(j), n+j]} D_i \subseteq [j]$, and we get the desired inequality.
We have now shown that $\tilde{\mathbb{Q}}_w \subseteq \mathbb{Q}_w$ for all $123$-avoiding $w$. By parts (a) and (b), the non-empty $\mathbb{Q}_w$ partition $\P_{12\cdots n} = {[2n] \choose n}$. Thus to get $\tilde{\mathbb{Q}}_w = \mathbb{Q}_w$, it is enough to show that
\begin{equation*}
\sum_{\substack{w \in S_n\\ \text{$w$ avoids $123$}}} \#\tilde{\mathbb{Q}}_w = {2n \choose n},
\end{equation*}
which we have done in Corollary~\ref{cor:123-avoiding-identity}.
\end{enumerate}
\end{proof}
We conclude with a few results on symmetries of positroids which will be useful in the next section.
\begin{thm} \label{thm:reflection} Let $\bar{x} = 2n+1-x$. Then $\overline{\P_w} = \P_{w_0 w^{-1} w_0}$ for any permutation $w$. \end{thm}
\begin{proof}
This follows immediately from the matrix identity $w_0 w^{-1} (2n+1-M_w) = M_{w_0 w^{-1} w_0}$.
\end{proof}
\begin{cor} \label{cor:reflection} For any $I \in {[2n] \choose n}$, $u_{\overline{I}} = w_0 u_I^{-1} w_0$. \end{cor}
\begin{proof}
Theorem~\ref{thm:reflection} is equivalent to $W_{\overline{I}} = w_0 W_I^{-1} w_0$. Since $w \mapsto w_0 w^{-1} w_0$ is an automorphism of Bruhat order,
\begin{equation*}
u_{\overline{I}} = \max W_{\overline{I}} = w_0(\max W_I)^{-1} w_0 = w_0 u_I^{-1} w_0.
\end{equation*}
\end{proof}
If $M$ is a matroid with groundset $E$, then $\{E \setminus I : \text{$I$ a basis of $M$}\}$ is also the set of bases for a matroid, the \emph{dual} of $M$, written $M^*$.
\begin{thm} \label{thm:dual} For any permutation $w$, $\P_w^*$ is isomorphic to $\P_{w^{-1}}$. \end{thm}
\begin{proof}
Set $w_n^* = (n+1)\cdots(2n)1\cdots n \in S_n$. Let us see that $w_n^* \P_w^* = \P_{w^{-1}}$. Since inversion is an automorphism of Bruhat order and $\P_w = \bigcup_{v \geq w} \mathbb{Q}_v$ by Theorem~\ref{thm:matroid-structure}, it is enough to show that $w_n^* \mathbb{Q}_v^* = \mathbb{Q}_{v^{-1}}$. Let $A$ be the set of anti-fixed points of $v$, and $A_1, \ldots, A_k$ the maximal intervals in $A$. Since $[n]$ is the disjoint union $L(v) \cup R(v) \cup A$, we have
\begin{equation*}
\mathbb{Q}_v^* = \{vR(v)\} \oplus \{L(v) + n\} \oplus \bigoplus_{i=1}^k \P_{A_i, n}^*.
\end{equation*}
Also, $L(v) = v^{-1}L(v^{-1})$ and $R(v) = v^{-1}R(v^{-1})$, so
\begin{equation*}
w_n^* \mathbb{Q}_v^* = \{v^{-1}L(v^{-1})\} \oplus \{R(v^{-1}) + n\} \oplus \bigoplus_{i=1}^k w_n^* \P_{A_i, n}^*.
\end{equation*}
The anti-fixed points of $v^{-1}$ are $n+1-A$, so all we need to do is show $w_n^* \P_{K, n}^* = \P_{n+1-K,n}$ for any interval $K \subseteq [n]$. When pushed through the isomorphism of $\P_{K,n}$ with $\mathcal{C}_{\#K+1}$ given at the beginning of this section, this identity becomes $w_0 \mathcal{C}_{\#K+1}^* = \mathcal{C}_{\#K+1}$, where $w_0 \in S_{\#K+1}$. But the latter identity is certainly true: complementing and reversing is an automorphism of the set of Dyck paths.
\end{proof}
\section{The Tutte polynomial of $\P_w$}
\label{sec:tutte-polynomial}
Theorem~\ref{thm:matroid-structure} writes $\P_w$ as the disjoint union of matroids $\mathbb{Q}_v$ over 123-avoiding permutations $v$ above $w$ in Bruhat order, with each $\mathbb{Q}_v$ isomorphic to a direct sum of Catalan matroids and a matroid with one basis. In this section we give an analogous formula for the Tutte polynomial of $\P_w$, writing it as a sum over 123-avoiding permutations $v$ above $w$ of certain modifications of the Tutte polynomials of the $\mathbb{Q}_v$. First we recall one definition of the Tutte polynomial.
\begin{defn}
Given a matroid $M$ with groundset $S$, the \emph{rank} of a subset $I \subseteq S$ is the maximal size of an intersection of $I$ with a basis of $M$. Write $\operatorname{rank}_M(I)$ for this number. The \emph{Tutte polynomial} of $M$ is then the bivariate generating function
\begin{equation*}
T_M(x,y) = \sum_{I \subseteq S} (x-1)^{\operatorname{rank}(M) - \operatorname{rank}_M(I)} (y-1)^{\#I - \operatorname{rank}_M(I)}.
\end{equation*}
Here $\operatorname{rank}(M)$ is the size of any basis of $M$.
\end{defn}
Let $T_n(x,y)$ be the Tutte polynomial of the matroid $\P_n$. If $M$ is the matroid on $\{2n+1,2n+2\}$ with bases $\{\{2n+1\}\}$, then $M \oplus \P_n$ is isomorphic to $C_{n+1}$. The Tutte polynomial of $M$ is $xy$, and Tutte polynomials are multiplicative on direct sums, so $T_n(x,y)$ is the Tutte polynomial of $C_{n+1}$ divided by $xy$.
Given a Dyck path $D$, let $a(D)$ be the height of the first peak and $b(D)$ the number of times $D$ touches the $x$-axis, not counting the first. In \cite{catalan-matroid}, Ardila shows that
\begin{equation*}
\sum_{D \in \mathcal{D}_n} x^{a(D)} y^{b(D)}.
\end{equation*}
is the Tutte polynomial of $\mathcal{C}_n$. Hence
\begin{equation} \label{eq:ardila-tutte}
T_n(x,y) = \sum_{D \in \mathcal{D}_{n+1}} x^{a(D)-1} y^{b(D)-1}.
\end{equation}
It is more natural to give $T_n(x,y)$ as a sum over $\P_n$ using the bijection to $C_{n+1}$ given at the beginning of Section~\ref{sec:Pw-structure}. Define a total order $\prec$ on $[2n]$ by
\begin{equation*}
n+1 \prec n \prec n+2 \prec n-1 \prec \cdots \prec 2n \prec 1.
\end{equation*}
For $I \in \P_n$, define $c(I)$ as the length of the longest $\prec$-initial segment of $[2n]$, and $d(I)$ as the number of integers $j \in [2n]$ such that $\#(I \cap [n+1,n+j]) = \#(I \cap [n-j+1,n-1])$. Then Ardila's formula \eqref{eq:ardila-tutte} translates to
\begin{equation} \label{eq:catalan-tutte-polynomial}
T_n(x,y) = \sum_{I \in \P_n} x^{c(I)} y^{d(I)}.
\end{equation}
Given an interval $K \subseteq [n]$, define a modified version of $T_n$ as follows:
\begin{equation*}
T_{K,n}(x,y) = \begin{cases}
T_{\#K}(x,y) & \text{if $K = [n]$}\\
T_{\#K}(x,1) & \text{if $1 \in K$ and $n \notin K$}\\
T_{\#K}(1,y) & \text{if $1 \notin K$ and $n \in K$}\\
T_{\#K}(1,1) & \text{if $1, n \notin K$}
\end{cases}
\end{equation*}
Notice that $T_{\#K+1}(1,1) = C_{\#K+1}$, the number of bases in $\P_{K,n}$. Also, given a $123$-avoiding $w \in S_n$ with runs of anti-fixed points $A_1, \ldots, A_k$, define
\begin{equation*}
U_w(x,y) = \prod_{i=1}^k T_{A_i, n}(x,y).
\end{equation*}
\begin{thm} \label{thm:tutte-polynomial} For any permutation $w \in S_n$, the Tutte polynomial of $\P_w$ is
\begin{equation*}
U_{w_0}(x,y) + (1 - (x-1)(y-1))\sum_{\substack{w \leq v < w_0 \\ \text{$v$ avoids $123$}}} U_v(x,y).
\end{equation*}
\end{thm}
We start with a characterization of ranks in $\P_w$. Recall that Lemma~\ref{lem:positroid-simplification-2} associates to each $n$-subset $I$ of $[2n]$ an permutation $u_I \in S_n$ in such a way that $I \in \P_w$ if and only if $u_I \geq w$. We will follow a similar strategy here, and construct, for any nonnegative integer $r$ and any $I \subseteq [2n]$, a permutation $u_I^r$ such that $I$ has rank at least $r$ in $\P_w$ if and only if $u_I^r \geq w$.
Say $I \subseteq [2n]$ has size at least $r$. Define $J_r(I)$ to be the $\preceq$-lexicographically smallest $n$-set such that $\#(J_r(I) \cap I) \geq r$. Explicitly, if
\begin{equation*}
I = \{i_1 \prec i_2 \prec \cdots \} \qquad \text{ and} \qquad [2n] \setminus \{i_1, \ldots, i_r\} = \{j_1 \prec j_2 \prec \cdots \},
\end{equation*}
then $J_r(I) = \{i_1, \ldots, i_r, j_1, \ldots, j_{n-r}\}$. Now define $u_I^r = u_{J_r(I)}$.
\begin{thm} \label{thm:rank-characterization} The set $I$ has rank at least $r$ in $\P_w$ if and only if $J_r(I) \in \P_w$, or equivalently, $u_I^r \geq w$. \end{thm}
\begin{rem}
What is really important here is the partial order $n+1, n \prec n+2, n-1 \prec \cdots \prec 2n, 1$: one can show that although $J_r(I)$ depends on the choice of linear extension of this partial order to a total order, $u_I^r$ does not (indeed, this is a consequence of Theorem~\ref{thm:rank-characterization}).
\end{rem}
We postpone the proof of Theorem~\ref{thm:rank-characterization} since it is somewhat involved, and move on to its consequences for ranks in $\P_w$. Let $\P_w^r = \{I \subseteq [2n] : \text{$I$ has rank at least $r$ in $\P_w$}\}$, and $\mathbb{Q}_w^r = \P_w^r \setminus \bigcup_{v > w} \P_v^r$. Theorem~\ref{thm:rank-characterization} shows that $\mathbb{Q}_w^r$ is the set of $I$ such that $u_I^r = w$. Equivalently, if we think of $J_r$ as a function $2^{[2n]} \to {[2n] \choose n}$, then $\mathbb{Q}_w^r = \bigcup_{K \in \mathbb{Q}_w} J_r^{-1}(K)$, and we can give a reasonable description of $J_r^{-1}(K)$ for a fixed $K$.
\begin{lem} \label{lem:Jk-fiber} Let $K$ be an $n$-subset of $[2n]$, and $0 \leq r \leq n$. Write $K = E \cup F$ where $E$ is the maximal initial segment of $[2n]$ in $K$ (in the order $\prec$). Then $J_r^{-1}(K)$ is the collection of sets of the form $E' \cup F \cup G$, where $E' \in {E \choose \#E-n+r}$ and $G \subseteq [2n]$ satisfies $\min(G) > \max(F)$.
\end{lem}
\begin{proof} Say $I = E' \cup F \cup G$ where $E'$, $F$, $G$ are as in the statement of the lemma, and write $I = \{i_1 \prec i_2 \prec \cdots\}$. Since $\#E' + \#F = r$, we have $\{i_1, \ldots, i_r\} = E' \cup F$. Thus $[2n] \setminus \{i_1, \ldots, i_r\}$ contains $E \setminus E'$, which has size $n-r$. Since $E$ is an initial segment, the smallest $n-r$ elements of $[2n] \setminus \{i_1, \ldots, i_r\}$ are exactly $E \setminus E'$, so $J_r(I) = (E' \cup F) \cup (E \setminus E') = K$.
Conversely, suppose $J_r(I) = K$, with $[2n] \setminus I = \{j_1 \prec j_2 \prec \cdots\}$ as in the definition of $J_r$. Let $E'$ consist of the $\prec$-first $\#E-n+r$ elements of $I$ (noting that $\#E-n+r \leq r \leq \#I$). Since $E$ is an initial segment of size $\#E'+n-r$, we must have $E' \cup \{j_1 \prec \cdots \prec j_{n-r}\} = E$. But this forces $F = \{i_{\#E'+1} \prec \cdots \prec i_r\} \subseteq I$, and then defining $C = \{i_{r+1} \prec \cdots \prec i_n\}$ gives the desired decomposition $I = E' \cup F \cup G$.
\end{proof}
Finally, we will need a description of $U_w$ in the style of $\eqref{eq:catalan-tutte-polynomial}$. As above, let $c(K)$ be the length of the largest $\prec$-initial segment of $[2n]$ contained in $K$, and let $\bar{c}(K)$ be the length of the largest $\prec$-final segment in $[2n] \setminus K$.
\begin{lem} \label{lem:modified-tutte} For any $123$-avoiding $w \neq w_0$,
\begin{equation*}
U_w(x,y) = \sum_{K \in \mathbb{Q}_w} x^{c(K)} y^{\overline{c}(K)}.
\end{equation*}
\end{lem}
\begin{proof}
Suppose $w$ avoids $123$, and has runs of anti-fixed points $A_1, \ldots, A_k$. Then any $K \in \mathbb{Q}_w$ is a disjoint union
\begin{equation*}
L_1 \cup \cdots \cup L_k \cup w(L(w)) \cup (R(w)+n),
\end{equation*}
where $L_i \in \P_{A_i,n}$.
Suppose $K \in \mathbb{Q}_w$ contains as a maximal $\prec$-initial segment $E = \{n+1, \ldots, n+\alpha, n, n-1, \ldots, n-\beta+1\}$ for some $\alpha, \beta$. By definition of $\mathbb{Q}_w$, this means $w$ has right-to-left maxima in positions $1, \ldots, \alpha$. But this is only possible if $w$ has anti-fixed points in those positions. Likewise, $w$ has left-to-right minima with values $n, n-1, \ldots, n-\beta+1$, hence anti-fixed points in positions $1, \ldots, \beta$. This shows that $E \subseteq L_1$ if $w(1) = n$, and that $E = \emptyset$ if $w(1) \neq n$. Hence $c(K) = c(L_1)$ if $w(1) = n$, and $c(K) = 0$ otherwise. An analogous argument shows that $\bar{c}(K) = \bar{c}(L_r)$ if $w(n) = 1$, and $\bar{c}(K) = 0$ otherwise. Now we see that:
\begin{itemize}
\item If $w(1) \neq n$ and $w(n) \neq 1$, then
\begin{equation*}
\sum_{K \in \mathbb{Q}_w} x^{c(K)} y^{\overline{c}(K)} = \#\mathbb{Q}_w = \prod_{i=1}^k T_{\#A_i}(1,1) = U_w(x,y).
\end{equation*}
\item If $w(1) = n$ and $w(n) \neq 1$, then using \eqref{eq:catalan-tutte-polynomial},
\begin{align*}
\sum_{K \in \mathbb{Q}_w} x^{c(K)} y^{\overline{c}(K)} &= \sum_{L \in \P_{\#A_1}} x^{c(L)} \prod_{i=2}^k T_{\#A_i}(1,1) \\
&= T_{\#A_1}(x,1)\prod_{i=2}^k T_{\#A_i}(1,1) = U_w(x,y).
\end{align*}
\item If $w(1) \neq n$ and $w(n) = 1$, then
\begin{align*}
\sum_{K \in \mathbb{Q}_w} x^{c(K)} y^{\overline{c}(K)} &= \sum_{L \in \P_{\#A_k}} y^{\overline{c}(L)} \prod_{i=1}^{k-1} T_{\#A_i}(1,1)\\
&= \sum_{L \in \P_{\#A_k}} y^{c(L)} \prod_{i=1}^{k-1} T_{\#A_i}(1,1)\\
&= T_{\#A_k}(y,1) \prod_{i=1}^{k-1} T_{\#A_i}(1,1)
\end{align*}
To get the second equality, we use the fact from Theorem~\ref{thm:dual} that $I \mapsto w_n^*([2n] \setminus I)$ is an automorphism of $\P_n$, and that it exchanges the statistics $c$ and $\bar{c}$. Taking the dual of a matroid corresponds to switching the variables in the Tutte polynomial, so since $\P_n$ is self-dual, $T_n(x,y) = T_n(y,x)$. Thus
\begin{equation*}
\sum_{K \in \mathbb{Q}_w} x^{c(K)} y^{\overline{c}(K)} = T_{\#A_k}(1,y) \prod_{i=1}^{k-1} T_{\#A_i}(1,1) = U_w(x,y).
\end{equation*}
\item If $w(1) = n$ and $w(n) = 1$, then $k > 1$ since $w \neq w_0$, and
\begin{align*}
\sum_{K \in \mathbb{Q}_w} x^{c(K)} y^{\overline{c}(K)} &= \sum_{L \in \P_{\#A_1}} x^{c(L)} \sum_{L \in \P_{\#A_k}} y^{\overline{c}(L)} \prod_{i=2}^{k-1} T_{\#A_i}(1,1) \\
&= T_{\#A_1}(x,1) T_{\#A_k}(1,y) \prod_{i=2}^{k-1} T_{\#A_i}(1,1) = U_w(x,y).
\end{align*}
\end{itemize}
\end{proof}
Let $T_w(x,y)$ be the Tutte polynomial of $\P_w$. The M\"obius function of Bruhat order on $S_n$ is $\mu(w,v) = (-1)^{\ell(v) - \ell(w)}$, so by M\"obius inversion, for any particular $w \in S_n$, Theorem~\ref{thm:tutte-polynomial} is equivalent to
\begin{equation*}
\sum_{v \geq w} (-1)^{\ell(v) - \ell(w)} T_v(x,y) = \begin{cases}
U_{w_0}(x,y) = T_n(x,y) & \text{if $w = w_0$}\\
(1 - (x-1)(y-1))U_w & \text{if $w \neq w_0$ avoids $123$}\\
0 & \text{if $w$ contains $123$}
\end{cases}.
\end{equation*}
\begin{proof}[Proof of Theorem~\ref{thm:tutte-polynomial}]
Write $\operatorname{rank}_v(I)$ for the rank of $I$ in $\P_v$. By Theorem~\ref{thm:rank-characterization}, $\operatorname{rank}_v(I) = r$ if and only if $v \leq u_I^r$ and $v \not\leq u_I^{r+1}$. Thus,
\begin{align*}
\sum_{v \geq w} (-1)^{\ell(v) - \ell(w)} T_v(x,y) &= \sum_{v \geq w} (-1)^{\ell(v) - \ell(w)} \sum_{I \subseteq [2n]} (x-1)^{n-\operatorname{rank}_v(I)} (y-1)^{\#I-\operatorname{rank}_v(I)}\\
&= \sum_{I \subseteq [2n]} \sum_{r=0}^n (x-1)^{n-r} (y-1)^{\#I-r} \sum_{v \in [w, u_I^r] \setminus [w, u_I^{r+1}]} (-1)^{\ell(v) - \ell(w)}.
\end{align*}
The term $(x-1)^{n-r}(y-1)^{\#I-r}$ will occur frequently, so we will simply write $f$ for it in the rest of the proof.
Any Bruhat interval with more than one element has the same number of elements with even length as with odd length \cite{bjorner-brenti}, so
\begin{equation*}
\sum_{v \in [w, u_I^r] \setminus [w, u_I^{r+1}]} (-1)^{\ell(v) - \ell(w)} = \begin{cases}
0 & \text{if $w \neq u_I^r$ and $w \neq u_I^{r+1}$}\\
1 & \text{if $w = u_I^r > u_I^{r+1}$}\\
-1 & \text{if $u_I^r > u_I^{r+1} = w$}
\end{cases}
\end{equation*}
Observe that $w = u_I^r > u_I^{r+1}$ if and only if $I \in \mathbb{Q}_w^r \setminus \mathbb{Q}_w^{r+1}$, and $u_I^r > u_I^{r+1} = w$ if and only if $I \in \mathbb{Q}_w^{r+1} \setminus \mathbb{Q}_w^r$. Therefore
\begin{align*}
\sum_{v \geq w} (-1)^{\ell(v) - \ell(w)} T_v(x,y) &= \sum_{r=0}^n \left[\sum_{I \in \mathbb{Q}_w^r \setminus \mathbb{Q}_w^{r+1}} f - \sum_{I \in \mathbb{Q}_w^{r+1} \setminus \mathbb{Q}_w^r} f \right]\\
&= \sum_{r=0}^n \left[\sum_{I \in \mathbb{Q}_w^r} f - \sum_{I \in \mathbb{Q}_w^{r+1}} f\right]\\
&= \sum_{r=0}^n \sum_{I \in \mathbb{Q}_w^r} f - (x-1)(y-1)\sum_{r=1}^{n+1} \sum_{I \in \mathbb{Q}_w^r} f.
\end{align*}
We may as well assume $w \neq w_0$, in which case $\mathbb{Q}_w^0 = \emptyset$. Also, $\mathbb{Q}_w^{n+1} = \emptyset$ for any $w$, so
\begin{align*}
\sum_{v \geq w} (-1)^{\ell(v) - \ell(w)} T_v(x,y) &= [1 - (x-1)(y-1)]\sum_{r=0}^n \sum_{I \in \mathbb{Q}_w^r} f\\
&= [1 - (x-1)(y-1)]\sum_{r=0}^n \sum_{K \in \mathbb{Q}_w} \sum_{I \in J_r^{-1}(K)} f.
\end{align*}
As in Lemma~\ref{lem:modified-tutte}, let $c(K)$ denote the length of the largest initial segment of $[2n]$ in $K$ in the order $\prec$, and $\bar{c}(K)$ the length of the largest final segment in $[2n] \setminus K$. By Lemma~\ref{lem:Jk-fiber}, a member of $J_r^{-1}(I)$ with size $j+r$ corresponds to a choice of (1) a $(c(K)-n+r)$-subset of a set of size $c(K)$, and (2) a $j$-subset of the maximal $\prec$-final segment of $[2n] \setminus K$. Hence
\begin{align*}
\sum_{I \in J_r^{-1}(K)} f &= \sum_{I \in J_r^{-1}(K)} (x-1)^{n-r}(y-1)^{\#I-r}\\
&= {c(K) \choose c(K)-n+r} (x-1)^{n-r} \sum_{j=0}^{\overline{c}(K)} {\bar{c}(K) \choose j} (y-1)^j\\
&= {c(K) \choose c(K)-n+r} (x-1)^{n-r} y^{\bar{c}(K)}.
\end{align*}
Continuing on,
\begin{align*}
\sum_{v \geq w} (-1)^{\ell(v) - \ell(w)} T_v(x,y) &= [1 - (x-1)(y-1)] \sum_{K \in \mathbb{Q}_w} \sum_{r=0}^n {c(K) \choose c(K)-n+r} (x-1)^{n-r} y^{\bar{c}(K)}\\
&= [1 - (x-1)(y-1)] \sum_{K \in \mathbb{Q}_w} \sum_{r=0}^n {c(K) \choose c(K)-n+r} (x-1)^{n-r} y^{\bar{c}(K)}\\
\end{align*}
This is equal to $[1 - (x-1)(y-1)]U_w(x,y)$ by Lemma~\ref{lem:modified-tutte}.
\end{proof}
To prove Theorem~\ref{thm:rank-characterization}, we will need some lemmas giving a Bruhat relation between $u_I$ and $u_J$ for two sets $I$ and $J$. Write $I \unlhd J$ if $I$ is the $\prec$-lexicographically minimal $\#I$-subset of $I \cup J$. Equivalently, $I \unlhd J$ if and only if $J \cap I = J \cap [\max_{\prec}(I)]$. This is a partial order on finite subsets of $\mathbb{N}$ of a fixed size.
\begin{lem} \label{lem:respects-bruhat} Suppose $I, J \in {[2n] \choose n}$ are such that either
\begin{enumerate}[(a)]
\item $I \unlhd J$, or
\item $J = I \setminus i \cup j$, where $i$ is contained in a $\prec$-initial segment in $I$ and $i \preceq j$.
\end{enumerate}
Then $u_I \geq u_J$.
\end{lem}
\begin{proof}
For the case where $I \unlhd J$, we may assume that $J = I \setminus i \cup j$ where $i \in I$ and $j \succ \max_{\prec}(I)$, since this is the covering relation for $\unlhd$. Recall the injective word $v_I$, with the property that $u_I$ is the greatest lower bound of $v_I$ and $w_0$, and whose entries are $I \cap [n+1,2n]$ in increasing order together with $I \cap [n]$ in decreasing order.
Suppose for the moment that $j \leq n$. In passing from $v_I$ to $v_J$, we remove one entry ($i$), insert a new entry ($j$) into the decreasing subsequence formed by $I \cap [n]$ in the unique way that keeps the subsequence decreasing, and then shift part of the subsequence either right or left to fill the gap left by $i$. If $i \leq n$, then $j \succ i$ implies $j < i$. Thus, $j$ enters right of the gap left by $i$, so we shift leftward. This means that $v_J$ is entrywise less than or equal to $v_I$, which implies the weaker statement that $v_J \leq v_I$ in Bruhat order. Therefore $u_J \leq u_I$.
Next suppose that $j \leq n$ still, but now $i > n$. We consider cases (a) and (b) separately. In case (b), where $i$ is contained in a $\prec$-initial segment in $I$, $v_I$ begins $(n+1)(n+2)\cdots (n+b)\cdots$, with $i$ being one of those first $b$ entries. Thus, every entry of the decreasing sequence is right of $i$, and in particular $j$ does enter to the right of it when we pass to $v_J$. In case (a), we have $j \succeq \max_{\prec}(I)$, which implies $j \leq \min(I)$ (in the usual order), so $j$ will be the last entry in the decreasing sequence in $v_J$. In particular, $j$ enters right of the gap where $i$ was. In both cases we end up with $v_J$ entrywise less than or equal to $v_I$ as before, as in the last paragraph.
Finally, assume that $j > n$. We will apply the map $x \mapsto \overline{x} = 2n+1-x$ and use Corollary~\ref{cor:reflection}. The arguments above only depend on $\prec$ being a linear extension of the partial order
\begin{equation*}
n+1,n \prec n+2,n-1 \prec \cdots \prec 2n,1
\end{equation*}
and so they still go through if we replace $\prec$ with the total order $\mathrel{\overline{\prec}}$ defined by
\begin{equation*}
n \mathrel{\overline{\prec}} n+1 \mathrel{\overline{\prec}} n-1 \mathrel{\overline{\prec}} n+2 \mathrel{\overline{\prec}} \cdots \mathrel{\overline{\prec}} 1 \mathrel{\overline{\prec}} 2n.
\end{equation*}
The hypotheses of the lemma still hold for $\overline{I}$, $\overline{i}$, and $\overline{j}$ using the order $\mathrel{\overline{\prec}}$.
As $\overline{j} \leq n$, the previous arguments show that $u_{\overline{I}} \geq u_{\overline{J}}$, or
\begin{equation*}
w_0 u_I^{-1} w_0 \geq w_0 u_J^{-1} w_0
\end{equation*}
by Corollary~\ref{cor:reflection}. Since $w \mapsto w_0 w^{-1} w_0$ is an automorphism of Bruhat order, this is equivalent to $u_I \geq u_J$.
\end{proof}
\begin{lem} \label{lem:Jk-respects-diamond} Say $I, I' \in {[2n] \choose r}$, where $r \leq n$. If $I \unlhd I'$, then $J_r(I) \unlhd J_r(I')$. \end{lem}
\begin{proof}
As in the proof of Lemma~\ref{lem:respects-bruhat}, we can assume that $I' = I \setminus i \cap j$, where $i \in I$ and $j \succ \max_{\prec}(I)$. Write $I = \{i_1 \prec \cdots \prec i_r\}$ and $[2n] \setminus I = \{j_1 \prec j_2 \prec \cdots\}$, so $J_r(I) = \{i_1, \ldots, i_r, j_1, \ldots, j_{n-r}\}$. There are several cases.
\begin{itemize}
\item If $j \preceq j_{n-r}$, then $J_r(I') = J_r(I)$.
\item If $i \preceq j_{n-r} \prec j$, then $J_r(I') = J_r(I) \setminus j_{n-r} \cup j$. Here $j \succ \max_{\prec}(I)$ and $j \succeq j_{n-r}$, so $j \succ \max_{\prec} J_r(I)$.
\item If $j \prec i \preceq j$, then $J_r(I') = J_r(I) \setminus i \cup j$. Once again, $j \succ \max_{\prec}(I)$ and $j \succ i \succeq j_{n-r}$, so $j \succ \max_{\prec} J_r(I)$.
\end{itemize}
\end{proof}
We can now prove Theorem~\ref{thm:rank-characterization}.
\begin{proof}[Proof of Theorem~\ref{thm:rank-characterization}]
Define
\begin{equation*}
W_I^r = \{w \in S_n : I \in \P_w^r\}.
\end{equation*}
It is clear from Theorem~\ref{thm:matroid-structure} that $W_I^r$ is a lower order ideal in Bruhat order. Theorem~\ref{thm:rank-characterization} is equivalent to the assertion that $u_I^r$ is the unique maximal element of $W_I^r$.
First we reduce to the case where $\#I = r$. Notice that $I \in \P_w^r$ if and only if $I' \in \P_w^r$ for some $r$-subset $I'$ of $I$. Equivalently,
\begin{equation*}
W_I^r = \bigcup_{I' \in {I \choose r}} W_{I'}^r.
\end{equation*}
If $I'$ is the $\prec$-lexicographically least $r$-subset of $I$, then $J_r(I') = J_r(I)$, so $u_{I'}^r = u_I^r$. For any other $r$-subset $I''$ of $I$, we have $I' \unlhd I''$. Lemma~\ref{lem:Jk-respects-diamond} then says $J_r(I') \unlhd J_r(I'')$, so Lemma~\ref{lem:respects-bruhat} implies $u_{I'}^r \geq u_{I''}^r$. Thus if we knew that each $W_{I''}^r$ has $u_{I''}^r$ as a unique maximum, we would be done: the unique maximum of $W_I^r$ would be $u_{I'}^r$. In other words, we can assume $\#I = r$.
Now we induct (downward) on $r$, assuming $\#I = r$. If $r = n$, then $W_I^r = W_I$ has $u_I^r = u_I$ as its unique maximum by Theorem~\ref{thm:matroid-structure}. Suppose $r < n$. Then $I \in \P_w^r$ if and only if $I \cup x \in \P_w^{r+1}$ for some $x \notin I$, or equivalently,
\begin{equation*}
W_I^r = \bigcup_{x \notin I} W_{I \cup x}^{r+1}.
\end{equation*}
By induction, each $W_{I \cup x}^{r+1}$ has $u_{I \cup x}^{r+1}$ as its unique maximal element. What we want to show, therefore, is that if $x \notin I$, then $u_I^r \geq u_{I \cup x}^{r+1}$, with equality holding for some $x$.
As in the definition of $J_r(I)$, write $I = \{i_1 \prec \cdots \prec i_r\}$ and $[2n] \setminus I = \{j_1 \prec j_2 \prec \cdots\}$, so that $J_r(I) = \{i_1, \ldots, i_r, j_1, \ldots, j_{n-r}\}$. Then
\begin{equation*}
J_{r+1}(I \cup x) = \begin{cases}
J_r(I) & \text{if $x \preceq j_{n-r}$}\\
J_r(I) \setminus j_{n-r} \cup x & \text{if $x \succ j_{n-r}$}
\end{cases}
\end{equation*}
In particular, if $x$ is $\prec$-minimal in $[2n] \setminus I$, then $x \preceq j_{n-r}$, so $u_I^r = u_{I \cup x}^{r+1}$.
We can now assume that $x \succ j_{n-r}$. By definition, $j_{n-r}$ is part of a $\preceq$-initial segment in $J_r(I)$, so Lemma~\ref{lem:respects-bruhat} shows that
\begin{equation*}
u_I^r = u_{J_r(I)} \geq u_{J_{r+1}(I \cup x)} = u_{I \cup x}^{r+1}.
\end{equation*}
\end{proof}
\section{Transversal matroids associated to permutation diagrams} \label{sec:diagram-matroids}
In this section we give some conjectures to the effect that results like Theorem~\ref{thm:matroid-structure} and Theorem~\ref{thm:tutte-polynomial} hold for another family of rank $n$ matroids on $[2n]$ indexed by $S_n$.
\begin{defn} The \emph{diagram} of $w \in S_n$ is
\begin{equation*}
D(w) = \{(i,w(j)) \in [n] \times [n] : i < j, w(i) > w(j)\}.
\end{equation*}
\end{defn}
Given $w \in S_n$, let $\tilde{M}_w$ be a generic $n \times 2n$ matrix $[A \mid I_n]$, where $I_n$ is an $n\times n$ identity matrix, and $A$ is $n \times n$ with $A_{ij} = 0$ whenever $(i,j) \in D(w)$. The \emph{diagram matroid} $DM_w$ of $w$ is the matroid of $\tilde{M}_w$.
\begin{ex}
Say $w = 31524$. Then
\begin{equation*}
D(w) = \begin{array}{ccccc}
\circ & \circ & \cdot & \cdot & \cdot\\
\cdot & \cdot & \cdot & \cdot & \cdot\\
\cdot & \circ & \cdot & \circ & \cdot\\
\cdot & \cdot & \cdot & \cdot & \cdot\\
\cdot & \cdot & \cdot & \cdot & \cdot
\end{array},
\end{equation*}
where we use matrix coordinates, and $\circ$ for lattice points in $D(w)$, $\cdot$ for those not in $D(w)$. The diagram matroid of $w$ is then the matroid of a generic matrix
\begin{equation*}
\begin{bmatrix}
1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & * & * & *\\
0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & * & * & * & * & *\\
0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & * & 0 & * & 0 & *\\
0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & * & * & * & * & *\\
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & * & * & * & * & *
\end{bmatrix}.
\end{equation*}
\end{ex}
\begin{conj} \label{conj:diagram-matroid-basis-count}
Theorem~\ref{thm:Pw-formula} holds for $DM_w$. That is, for any $w \in S_n$, the number of bases of $DM_w$ is
\begin{equation*}
\sum_{\substack{v \geq w \\ \text{$v$ avoids $123$}}} C_{\ell_1+1} \cdots C_{\ell_k+1},
\end{equation*}
where $\ell_1, \ldots, \ell_k$ are the lengths of the runs of anti-fixed points of $v$.
\end{conj}
However, Theorem~\ref{thm:matroid-structure} no longer holds, as it can happen that $w \leq v$ but $DM_v \not\subseteq DM_w$. One can still hope to prove Conjecture~\ref{conj:diagram-matroid-basis-count} by M\"obius inversion, but a less trivial sign-reversing involution is required.
Of course, if $DM_w$ and $\P_w$ were isomorphic, then Conjecture~\ref{conj:diagram-matroid-basis-count} would be true. However, this need not be the case.
\begin{conj} The matroids $DM_w$ and $\P_w$ are isomorphic if and only if $w$ avoids the pattern $21354$. \end{conj}
This conjecture has been verified through $S_7$. Despite this, their Tutte polynomials seem to agree, also verified through $S_7$.
\begin{conj} For any $w \in S_n$, the Tutte polynomial of $DM_w$ is equal to the Tutte polynomial of $\P_w$. \end{conj}
There is a combinatorial procedure called \emph{shifting} that relates $DM_w$ and $\P_w$ (and which has geometric connections making it useful in studying positroid varieties and other subvarieties of Grassmannians \cite{knutson-interval-positroid-varieties, pawlowski-liu-conjecture-rank-varieties}). Given integers $i$ and $j$, and a set $I$, let
\begin{equation*}
\shift_{i\to j} I = \begin{cases}
I \setminus i \cup j & \text{if $i \in I$ and $j \notin I$}\\
I & \text{else}
\end{cases}
\end{equation*}
If $X$ is a collection of sets, and $I \in X$, then we define
\begin{equation*}
\shift_{i\to j, X} I = \begin{cases}
\shift_{i \to j} I & \text{if $\shift_{i \to j} I \neq I$ and $\shift_{i \to j} I \notin X$}\\
I & \text{else}
\end{cases}
\end{equation*}
Finally, define $\shift_{i\to j} X$ to be $\{\shift_{i\to j, X} I : I \in X\}$.
Let $\mathcal{B}(A)$ denote the matroid of a matrix $A$. We can also apply shifting to matrices. Let $\shift_{i\to j}A$ be the matrix of the same size as $A$ such that
\begin{equation*}
A_{pq} = \begin{cases}
A_{pi} & \text{if $q = j$ and $A_{pj} = 0$}\\
0 & \text{if $q = i$ and $A_{pj} = 0$}\\
A_{pq} & \text{else}
\end{cases}
\end{equation*}
We have $\#\shift_{i \to j} X = \#X$, but it need not be the case that $\mathcal{B}(\shift_{i \to j} A) = \shift_{i \to j} \mathcal{B}(A)$. For example, if $A$ is a $2\times 2$ identity matrix, then $\shift_{2 \to 1}\mathcal{B}(A) = \{12\}$, while $\mathcal{B}(\shift_{i \to j}A)$ is empty. In general, we only get a containment.
\begin{lem} \label{lem:matroid-shift-containment} If the entries of $A$ are algebraically independent, then $\mathcal{B}(\shift_{i\to j} A) \subseteq \shift_{i \to j}\mathcal{B}(A)$. \end{lem}
\begin{proof} Suppose $I \in \mathcal{B}(\shift_{i \to j} A)$, where $I = \{b_1 < \cdots < b_n\}$. Then there is a transversal of $A$ in columns $I$, i.e. a bijection $\pi : I \to [n]$ such that $(\shift_{i \to j} A)_{\pi(b_p)b_p} \neq 0$ for each $p$. We consider various cases.
\begin{itemize}
\item If $i, j \notin I$, then $I \in \mathcal{B}(A)$ and $\shift_{i \to j}I = I$, so $I \in \shift_{i \to j}\mathcal{B}(A)$.
\item If $i \in I$, $j \notin I$, then again $I \in \mathcal{B}(A)$, because $\shift_{i \to j}A$ restricted to columns $I$ is $A$ restricted to columns $I$ with some nonzero entries made zero. Since $(\shift_{i\to j}A)_{\pi(i)i}$ is nonzero, $A_{\pi(i)j}$ must be nonzero. Therefore the bijection $\pi' : I \setminus i \cup j \to [n]$ which agrees with $\pi$ on $I \setminus i$ and having $\pi'(j) = \pi(i)$ is a transversal of $A$. This shows that $\mathcal{B}(A)$ also contains $\shift_{i \to j}I$. But then $I \in \shift_{i \to j}\mathcal{B}(A)$.
\item Suppose $i \notin I$, $j \in I$. If $A_{\pi(j)i} \neq 0$, then modifying $\pi$ appropriately as in the last case will give a transversal of $A$ in columns $I \setminus j \cup i$. Then $I = \shift_{i\to j}(I \setminus j \cup i) \in \shift_{i\to j}\mathcal{B}(A)$.
If $A_{\pi(j), i} \neq 0$, then the $A_{\pi(j)j} \neq 0$, and so $I \in \mathcal{B}(A)$. Then $I = \shift_{i \to j}I \in \shift_{i\to j}\mathcal{B}(A)$.
\item Suppose $i, j \in I$. Since the $(\shift_{i \to j}A)_{\pi(i)i}$ is nonzero, the same entry of $A$ is also nonzero. Therefore if $A_{\pi(j)j} \neq 0$, then $\pi$ is still a transversal of $A$ in columns $I$.
Now say $A_{\pi(j)j} = 0$. Then, since the $(\shift_{i\to j}A)_{\pi(j)j}$ is nonzero, so is $A_{\pi(j)i}$. Also, since $(\shift_{i \to j}A)_{\pi(i)i}$ is nonzero, so is $A_{\pi(i)j}$. Therefore the bijection $\pi' : I \to [n]$ agreeing with $\pi$ on $I \setminus \{i,j\}$, and having $\pi'(i) = \pi(j)$, $\pi'(j) = \pi(i)$, is a transversal of $A$ in columns $I$.
Either way we see that $I \in \mathcal{B}(A)$, and so $I = \shift_{i\to j}I \in \shift_{i \to j}\mathcal{B}(A)$.
\end{itemize}
\end{proof}
The matrices $M_w$ and $\tilde{M}_w$ defining $\P_w$ and $DM_w$ turn out to be related by a sequence of shifts. Let $\shift_w$ be the composition
\begin{equation*}
\shift_{2n \to w(n)} \cdots \shift_{n+2 \to w(2)} \shift_{n+1 \to w(1)}.
\end{equation*}
\begin{lem}[\cite{pawlowski-liu-conjecture-rank-varieties}, Theorem 5.5] \label{lem:matrix-shift} For any permutation $w$, $\shift_w M_w = \tilde{M}_w$. \end{lem}
Thus, Lemma~\ref{lem:matroid-shift-containment} shows that $DM_w \subseteq \shift_w \P_w$. Since shifting preserves the size of a collection of sets, we see that Conjecture~\ref{conj:diagram-matroid-basis-count} is equivalent to:
\begin{conj} \label{conj:shifting} For any permutation $w$, $\shift_w \P_w = DM_w$. \end{conj}
\bibliographystyle{plain}
|
\subsection{Introduction}
In many inference problems, the available data can be represented on a
weighted graph. Given the knowledge of the edge weights, the task is
to infer latent variables carried by the nodes. Here, we shall
consider the problem of recovering binary node labels from censored
edge measurements
\cite{abbe2014decoding,abbe2013conditional}. Specifically, given an
Erd\H{o}s-R\'enyi random graph $G=(V,E)\in {\cal G}(n,\alpha/n)$ with $n$ nodes carrying
latent variables $\sigma_i\!=\!\pm 1,\ 1\!\leq\!i\!\leq\!n$, we draw the edge labels
$J_{ij}\!=\!\pm1,\ (ij)\in E$ from the following distribution:
\begin{equation}
\label{edgeweights}
P(J_{ij} \lvert \sigma_i,\sigma_j) \!=\! (1-\epsilon) {\mathbf{1}}(J_{ij}=\sigma_i \sigma_j) +
\epsilon {\mathbf{1}}(J_{ij}=-\sigma_i \sigma_j)\,,
\end{equation}
where $\epsilon$ is a noise parameter. In the noiseless case
$\epsilon\!=\!0$, we have $\sigma_i\sigma_j\! =\!J_{ij}$ and one can easily
recover the communities in each connected component along a spanning
tree. When $\epsilon\!=\!1/2$, on the other hand, the graph doesn't
contain any information about the latent variables $\sigma_i$, and recovery
is impossible. What happens in between? The problem of {\it exactly}
recovering the latent variables $\sigma_i$ has been studied in
\cite{abbe2014decoding}. It turns out that, asymptotically in the
large $n$ limit, exact recovery is shown to be possible if and only if
\begin{align}
\label{exact}
\alpha>\alpha_{\rm exact}= \frac{2\log n}{(1-2\epsilon)^2}\,,
\end{align}
where $\alpha$ is the average degree of the graph. Note that the
variable of an isolated vertex cannot be recovered so that the average
degree has to grow at least like $\log n$, as in the Coupon
collector's problem, to ensure that the graph is connected.
We consider in this paper the case where the average degree $\alpha$
will remain fixed as $n$ tends to infinity. In this setting, we cannot
ask for exact recovery and we consider here a different question: is
it possible to infer an assignment $\hat{\sigma}_i$ of the latent
variables that is \emph{positively correlated} with the planted
variables $\sigma_i$? We call positively correlated an assignment
$\hat{\sigma}_i$ such that the following quantity, called
\emph{overlap}, is strictly positive:
\begin{align}
\label{overlap}
2\left[{\rm max}\left(\frac{1}{n}\overset{n}{\underset{i=1}{\sum}}{\mathbf{1}}(\hat{\sigma}_i=\sigma_i),\frac{1}{n}\overset{n}{\underset{i=1}{\sum}}{\mathbf{1}}(\hat{\sigma}_i=-\sigma_i)\right)-\frac{1}{2}\right]\,.
\end{align}
In the limit $n\rightarrow\infty$, this overlap vanishes for a random guess $\hat{\sigma}_i$, and is equal to unity if the recovery is exact.
We will refer to the task of finding a positively correlated
assignment $\hat{\sigma}_i$ as \emph{partial recovery}. This task has
been shown \cite{HLM2012,LMX2013} to be possible only if
\begin{align}
\label{transition}
\alpha>\alpha_{\rm detect}=\frac{1}{(1-2\epsilon)^2}.
\end{align}
To the best of our knowledge, there is no rigorous proof that this
bound is also sufficient. In \cite{HLM2012}, the same authors also
showed that belief propagation (BP) allows to saturate this
bound. However, there is no rigorous analysis of BP for this problem
and the fact that condition (\ref{transition}) is necessary and
sufficient was left as a conjecture in \cite{HLM2012} and only the
necessary part was proved in \cite{LMX2013}. Moreover, from a
practical point of view, BP requires the knowledge of the noise
parameter $\epsilon$.
In this contribution, we describe two simple spectral algorithms and
we show rigorously that they are optimal, in the sense that they can
perform partial recovery as soon as $\alpha>\alpha_{\rm detect}$.
Additionally, the output of these algorithms is shown numerically to
have an overlap similar to that of BP, without requiring the knowledge
of the noise parameter $\epsilon$. This closes the gap from
\cite{HLM2012,LMX2013}, where spectral methods are introduced that
succeed only if the connectivity is significantly larger than the
threshold (\ref{transition}). The resulting algorithms are thus fast,
trivial to implement, and asymptotically optimal.
\subsection{Motivation and Related work}
There are various interpretations and models that connect to this
problem such as i) Community detection \cite{abbe2013conditional}: we
try to recover the community membership of the nodes based on noisy
(or censored) observations about their relationship; ii) Correlation
clustering \cite{bansal2004correlation}: we try to cluster the graph
$G$ by minimizing the number of ``disagreeing edges'' ($J_{ij}=-1$) in
each cluster. These examples, and others such as synchronisation, are
discussed in details in \cite{abbe2014decoding}.
The inspiration for the present contribution comes from recent
developments in the problem of detecting communities in the (sparse)
stochastic block model. The threshold for partial recovery in the
stochastic block model was conjectured in \cite{decelle2011asymptotic}
and proved in
\cite{mossel2012stochastic,massoulie2013community,mossel2013proof}. Optimal
spectral methods, based on the same operators as the algorithms
introduced here, were proposed in
\cite{krzakala2013spectral,saade2014spectral}. These operators were in
particular shown to be much better suited to very sparse graphs than
the traditional adjacency or Laplacian operators.
Interestingly, this problem first appeared in statistical
physics. Indeed, the posterior distribution corresponding to
eq. (\ref{edgeweights}) reads, using
$\beta_0=\frac 12 \log\frac{1-\epsilon}{\epsilon}$
\begin{align}
\label{spinglass}
P(\sigma\lvert J)=\frac{e^{\beta_0\underset{(i j)\in E}{\sum}J_{ij}\sigma_i\sigma_j}}{\mathcal{Z}_J}\,.
\end{align}
This is nothing but the spin glass \cite{mezard1987spin} problem where
the couplings $J_{ij}$ are correlated with the "planted'' configuration
$\sigma_i$ \cite{PhysRevLett.102.238701,abbe2013conditional}. Such
problems can also be shown to be equivalent to spin glasses on the
so-called Nishimori line
\cite{LectureKrzakala,nishimori1981internal}. With these notations,
the detection condition (\ref{transition}) corresponds to the
well-known spin glass transition \cite{viana1985phase,guerra2004high}
at $\sqrt{\alpha_{\rm detect}}\tanh {\beta_0}=1$. In this spin glass
context, \cite{zhang2014non} already conjectured that a spectral
algorithm based on the non-backtracking operator (see sec. \ref{the
non-backtracking operator}) was optimal.
\subsection{Outline and main results}
In section \ref{sec:algorithms}, we describe two spectral algorithms
that achieve the threshold (\ref{transition}). These algorithms are
based on two linear operators: the non-backtracking operator
introduced in \cite{krzakala2013spectral}, and the Bethe Hessian
introduced in \cite{saade2014spectral}. We further illustrate their
properties by showing the results of numerical experiments. In section
\ref{sec:properties}, we list the spectral properties of the
non-backtracking operator that are relevant to the present
context. Finally, we discuss the properties of the Bethe Hessian and
its relation with the non-backtracking operator in section
\ref{sec:BH} and discuss its connection with the Bethe free energy.
\section{Spectral algorithms}
\label{sec:algorithms}
\subsection{The non-backtracking operator}
\label{the non-backtracking operator}
The non-backtracking operator acts on the directed edges
$i\rightarrow j$ of the graph as
\begin{align}
\label{eq:B}
{\rm B}_{i\to j,k\to \ell} = J_{k\ell}{\mathbf{1}}(j=k) {\mathbf{1}}(i\neq \ell) \, .
\end{align}
It is therefore represented by a $2m\times2m$ matrix, where $m$ is the
number of edges in the graph. As discussed in
\cite{krzakala2013spectral,zhang2014non} the motivation for using this
operator is that it corresponds to the linear approximation of belief propagation for this problem around the so-called uninformative fixed
point of BP.
Similarly to \cite{krzakala2013spectral}, one can show (see
Sec. \ref{sec:BH} for details) that the eigenvalues of ${\rm B}$ that
are different from $\pm 1$ form the spectrum of the simpler
$2n\times 2n$ matrix
\begin{align}
{\rm B}^{\prime}=\left( \begin{array}{cc}
0 & D-\mathds{1} \\
-\mathds{1} & J
\end{array} \right)\,,
\label{defBprime}
\end{align}
where $\mathds{1}$ is the $n\times n$ identity matrix, $D$ is the
diagonal matrix defined by $D_{ii}=d_i$, where $d_i$
is the degree of node $i$, and $J$ has entries equal to the edge weights $J_{ij}$. Furthermore, if $(\lambda\neq\pm1,v\in\mathbb{R}^{2m})$ is an eigenpair of ${\rm B}$, then $(\lambda,v^{\prime}\in\mathbb{R}^{2n})$ is an eigenpair of ${\rm B^{\prime}}$ if
\begin{align}
\label{vectorsBprime1}
&v^{\prime}_{n+i}=\underset{j\in\partial i}{\sum} v_{j\rightarrow i},\qquad \forall 1\leq i\leq n,\\
\label{vectorsBprime2}
&\lambda v^\prime_i=(d_i-1)v^{\prime}_{n+i}\,,
\end{align}
where $\partial i$ and $d_i$ are the set of neighbors and the degree
of node $i$. We will therefore favor using ${\rm B}^{\prime}$. The
algorithm is then as follows: given a graph with edge weights
$J_{ij}$,
\textbf{Algorithm 1}
\begin{enumerate}
\item build the matrix ${\rm B}^{\prime}$
\item compute its leading eigenvalue $\lambda_1$ (with largest magnitude), and its corresponding eigenvector $v^\prime=\{v^\prime_i\}$.
\item if $\lambda_1\in\mathbb{R}$ and $\lambda_1>\sqrt{\alpha}$, where $\alpha$ is the average degree of the graph, set $\hat{x}_i=\text{sign}(v^\prime_{n+i})$. Otherwise, raise an error.
\end{enumerate}
Theorem 1 ensures that whenever (\ref{transition}) holds, this algorithm outputs an assignment $\hat{x}_i$ that is positively correlated with the planted latent variables $x_i$.
\subsection{The Bethe Hessian}
Another operator closely related to the non-backtracking operator was
introduced in \cite{saade2014spectral}. This operator, called the
Bethe Hessian, is an $n\times n$ real and symmetric matrix defined as
\begin{align}
{\rm H}=(\alpha-1)\mathds{1}-\sqrt{\alpha}J+D\,,
\end{align}
where $D$ is the diagonal matrix of vertex degrees. Based on this
operator, we propose the following algorithm: given a graph with edge
weights $J_{ij}$,
\textbf{Algorithm 2}
\begin{enumerate}
\item build the Bethe Hessian ${\rm H}$
\item compute its (algebraically) smallest eigenvalue $\lambda$, and its corresponding eigenvector $v$.
\item if $\lambda<0$, set $\hat{x}_i=\text{sign}(v_{i})$. Otherwise, raise an error.
\end{enumerate}
Justifications for this second algorithm, and its relation with the
first one, will be provided in section \ref{sec:BH}. Compared to the
first algorithm, this second one is based on a smaller, symmetric
matrix, which leads to improved numerical performance and
stability. Additionally, in the case of more general edge weights
$J_{ij}\neq\pm 1$, the reduction of ${\rm B}$ to a smaller matrix
${\rm B^{\prime}} $ fails, and one has to work with a $2m\times 2m$
matrix. The Bethe Hessian, on the other hand, generalizes easily to
arbitrary weights without any loss in scalability
\cite{saade2014spectral}.\par
\subsection{Numerical results}
Before turning to proofs, we show on figure \ref{fig:overlap} the
numerical performance of our two algorithms, and compare them with the
performance of belief propagation (\cite{pearl1982reverend,HLM2012})
which is believed to be optimal on such locally tree-like graphs in
the sense that it gives, arguably, the Bayes optimal value of the
overlap asymptotically. As shown in section \ref{sec:properties}, both
algorithms 1 and 2 are able to achieve partial recovery as soon as
$\alpha>\alpha_{\rm detect}$, and their overlap is similar to that of
BP, though of course strictly smaller. Note again that BP requires the
knowledge of $\epsilon$ while the two spectral algorithms described
here do not, are trivial to implement, run faster, and avoid the
potential non-convergence problem of belief propagation while
remaining asymptotically optimal in detecting the hidden
assignment. We also observe, empirically, that the overlap given by
the Bethe Hessian seems to be always superior to the one provided by
the non-backtracking operator.
\begin{figure}[!t]
\includegraphics[scale=0.48]{overlap.pdf}
\caption{Overlap as a function of $\alpha$: comparison between
algorithm 1 (based on the non-backtracking operator {\rm B}),
algorithm 2 (based on the Bethe Hessian {\rm H}), and belief
propagation (BP). The noise parameter $\epsilon$ is fixed to $0.25$
(corresponding to $\alpha_{\rm detect}=4$), and we vary $\alpha$.
The overlap for {\rm B} and {\rm H} is averaged over 20 graphs of
size $n=10^5$. The overlap for BP is estimated asymptotically using
the standard method of population dynamics (see for instance
\cite{mezard2009information}), with a population of size $10^4$. All
three methods output a positively correlated assignment as soon as
$\alpha>\alpha_{\rm detect}$. Spectral algorithms 1 and 2 have an
overlap similar to that of BP, with the same phase transition, while
being simpler and not requiring the knowledge of the parameter
$\epsilon$. }
\label{fig:overlap}
\end{figure}
\section{Spectral properties of the non-backtracking operator}
\label{sec:properties}In this section, we state results concerning the spectrum of ${\rm B}$ and show that algorithm 1 outputs an assignment $\hat{\sigma}_i$ that is positively correlated with the planted one, whenever (\ref{transition}) holds.
As already noticed in previous work for the case of an unweighted random graph \cite{krzakala2013spectral,saade2014spectralDensity}, the superior performance of the non-backtracking operator {\rm B} is due to the particular shape of its spectrum. In the case of the stochastic block model \cite{Holland1983109}, it decomposes into a bulk of uninformative eigenvalues contained in a disk of radius $\sqrt{\alpha}$ in the complex plane, and a few real and informative eigenvalues outside of the disk. This observation was recently proven in \cite{blm15}, in the case of 2 communities.
The following theorem generalizes this previous result to the present
setting and is the main result of this paper.
\begin{theorem}\label{main:the}
Given an Erd\H{o}s-R\'enyi random graph with average degree $\alpha$, variables assigned to vertices $\sigma_i =\pm 1$ uniformly at
random independently from the graph and where the edges carry weights
sampled from (\ref{edgeweights}),
we denote by ${\rm B}$ the non-backtracking operator defined by (\ref{eq:B}).
and by $\lvert\lambda_1\rvert\geq\lvert\lambda_2\rvert\geq\cdots\geq\lvert\lambda_{2m}\rvert$ the eigenvalues of ${\rm B}$ in order of decreasing magnitude.
Then, with probability tending to $1$ as $n\to \infty$, we have:
\begin{enumerate}
\item[(i)] if $\alpha<\alpha_{\rm detect}$ then $\lvert\lambda_1\rvert\leq\sqrt{\alpha}+o(1)$.
\item[(ii)] if $\alpha>\alpha_{\rm detect}$, then $\lambda_1\in\mathbb{R},\
\lambda_1=\alpha(1-2\epsilon)+o(1) > \sqrt{\alpha}$, and $|\lambda_2|\leq\sqrt{\alpha}+o(1)$.
Additionally, denoting $v$ the eigenvector associated with $\lambda_1$, the following assignment is positively correlated with the planted variables $\sigma_i$:
\begin{eqnarray*}
\hat{\sigma}_i=\text{sign}\left(\underset{j\in\partial i}{\sum} v_{j\rightarrow i}\right)\,.
\end{eqnarray*}
\end{enumerate}
\end{theorem}
This theorem is illustrated on Fig. \ref{fig:spectrum}.
It is then straightforward to show the following:
\begin{corollary}
The assignment output by Algo. $1$ is positively correlated with the
planted variables $\sigma_i$ if and only if
\begin{align}
\alpha> \alpha_{\rm detect}\,.
\end{align}
\end{corollary}
We now give a brief sketch of proof for our Theorem
\ref{main:the}. The proof relies heavily on the techniques developed
in \cite{blm15}. We try to use notation consistent with \cite{blm15}:
$\vec E$ is the set of oriented edges and for any
$e=u\to v=(u,v) \in \vec E$, we set $e_1=u$, $e_2=v$ and
$e^{-1}=(v,u)$. For a matrice $M$, its transpose is denoted by
$M^*$. We start with a simple observation: if $t$ is the vector in
${\mathbb{R}}^{\vec E}$ defined by $t_e = \sigma_{e_2}$ and $\odot$ is the
Hadamard product, i.e. $(t\odot x)_e = \sigma_{e_2}x_e$, then we have
\begin{eqnarray}
\label{eq:trans}\rm B x = \lambda x \Leftrightarrow \tilde{B}(t\odot x)= \lambda (t\odot x),
\end{eqnarray} with $\tilde{\rm B}$ defined by
$\tilde{\rm B}_{ef}= \rm B_{ef}\sigma_{f_1}\sigma_{f_2}$. In particular, $\rm B$
an $\tilde{\rm B}$ have the same spectrum and there is a trivial relation
between their eigenvectors. It will be easier to work with $\tilde{\rm B}$
so to lighten the notation, we will denote (in this section): \begin{eqnarray*}
{\rm B}_{ef} = {\mathbf{1}}(e_2=f_1){\mathbf{1}}(e_1\neq f_2)P_f, \end{eqnarray*} where
$P_f=\sigma_{f_1}J_f\sigma_{f_2}$. Note that the random variables
$P_f$ are now i.i.d. with ${\mathbf{P}}(P_f=1)=1-{\mathbf{P}}(P_f=-1) =
1-\epsilon$.
With this formulation, the problem is said in statistical physics to
be "on the Nishimori
line"\cite{LectureKrzakala,nishimori1981internal}.
For the case $(1-2\epsilon)^2\alpha <1$, the proof is relatively
easy. Indeed, from \cite{LMX2013}, we know that our setting is
contiguous to the setting with $\epsilon=1/2$. In this case, the random
variable $P_{i,j}$ are centered and a version of the trace method will
allow to upper bound the spectral radius of $B$. Note however, that
one needs to condition on the graph to be $\ell$-tangle-free,
i.e. such that every neighborhood of radius $\ell$ contains at most
one cycle in order to apply the first moment method.
We now consider the case $(1-2\epsilon)^2\alpha \!>\!1$ and
denote by $P$ the linear mapping on ${\mathbb{R}}^{\vec E}$ defined by
$(Px)_e=P_ex_{e^{-1}}$ (i.e. the matrix associated to $P$ is $P_{ef} =
P_e{\mathbf{1}}(f=e^{-1})$). Note that $P^*=P$ and since $P_e^2=1$, $P$ is an
involution so that $P$ is an orthogonal matrix. A simple computation
shows that $B^kP = PB^{*k}$, hence $B^kP$ is a symmetric matrix.
This symmetry corresponds to the oriented path symmetry in
\cite{blm15} and will be crucial to our analysis.
We also define $\tilde{\alpha}=(1-2\epsilon)\alpha$ and $\chi\in
{\mathbb{R}}^{\vec E}$ with $\chi_e=1$ for all $e\in \vec E$.
The proof strategy is then similar to Section 5 in
\cite{blm15}. Consider a sequence $\ell \sim \kappa
\log_{\tilde{\alpha}}n$ for some small positive $\kappa$. Let
\begin{eqnarray*}
\varphi = \frac{B^\ell \chi}{\|B^\ell \chi\|}, \quad \theta = \|B^\ell
P\varphi\|, \quad \zeta = \frac{B^\ell P\varphi}{\theta}.
\end{eqnarray*}
If $R= B^\ell - \theta \zeta P\varphi^*$ and we can prove that $\|R\|$
is small in comparison with $\theta$, then we can use a theorem on
perturbation of eigenvalues and eigenvectors adapted from the
Bauer-Fike theorem (see Section 4 in \cite{blm15}) saying that
$B^\ell$ should have an eigenvalue close to $\theta$.
More precisely, for $y\in {\mathbb{R}}^{\vec E}$ with $\|y\|=1$, write
$y=sP\varphi +x$ with $x\in (P\varphi)^{\bot}$ and $s\in {\mathbb{R}}$. Then,
we find
\begin{eqnarray*}
\|Ry\| =\|B^\ell x+s(B^\ell P\varphi -\theta \zeta)\| \leq \sup_{x:
\langle x, P\varphi \rangle =0, \|x\|=1}\|B^\ell x\|\,.
\end{eqnarray*}
This last quantity can be shown to be upper bounded by $(\log
n)^c\alpha^{\ell/2}$ similarly as in Proposition 12 in
\cite{blm15}.
Moreover, we can also show that w.h.p.
\begin{eqnarray}
\label{eq:cond}\langle \zeta, P\varphi\rangle \geq c_0,\quad c_0\tilde{\alpha}^\ell
\leq \theta\leq c_1 \tilde{\alpha}^\ell.
\end{eqnarray}
These bounds allow to show that $B$ has an eigenvalue $|\lambda_1-
\tilde{\alpha}|=O(1/\ell)$ and that $|\lambda_2|\leq
\sqrt{\alpha}+o(1)$.
Note that $\theta = \frac{\|B^\ell B^{*\ell} P \chi \|}{\|B^\ell
\chi\|}$, so that we need to compute quantities of the type
$\|B^\ell\chi\|$.
We now explain the main ideas to compute these quantities. First note
that, $(B^\ell\chi)_e$ depends only on the ball of radius $\ell$
around the edge $e$. For $\ell$ not too large, this neighborhood can
be coupled with a Galton-Watson branching process with offspring
distribution $ \mathrm{Poi}(\alpha)$. It is then natural to consider this
Poisson Galton-Watson branching process with i.i.d. weights
$P_{u,v}\in\{\pm 1\}$ on its edges with mean $1-2\epsilon$.
For $u$ in the tree, we denote by $|u|$ its generation and by $Y(u)
=\prod_{s=1}^t P_{\gamma_s,\gamma_{s+1}}$ where $\gamma
=(\gamma_1,\dots, \gamma_t)$ is the unique path between the root
$o=\gamma_1$ and $u=\gamma_t$. Then $(B^\ell\chi)_e$ is well
approximated by:
\begin{eqnarray*}
Z_\ell = \sum_{|u|=\ell} Y(u).
\end{eqnarray*}
It is easy to see that $X_t = \frac{Z_t}{\tilde{\alpha}^t}$ is a
martingale (with respect to the natural filtration) with zero
mean. Moreover we have
\begin{eqnarray*}
{\mathbf{E}}\left[ Z_t^2 \right] &=& {\mathbf{E}}\left[ \sum_{u,v: |u|=|v|=t}
Y(u)Y(v)\right]\\
&=& \sum_{i=0}^t \alpha^{t-i} (1-2\epsilon)^{2i}\alpha^{2i}
= O\left( \tilde{\alpha}^{2t}\right),
\end{eqnarray*}
where the last equality is valid only if $(1-2\epsilon)^2\alpha >1$.
So in this case, we have ${\mathbf{E}}\left[X^2_t\right]=O(1)$ and the
martingale $X_t$ converges a.s. and in $L^2$ to a limiting random
variable $X(\infty)$ with mean one.
Following the argument as in \cite{blm15}, this reasoning leads to
(\ref{eq:cond}).
We now consider the eigenvector associated with $\lambda_1$. It
follows from Bauer-Fike theorem (see Section 4 in \cite{blm15}) that
the eigenvector $x$ associated to $\lambda_1$ is asymptotically
aligned with $\frac{B^\ell B^{*\ell} P \chi}{\|B^\ell B^{*\ell} P \chi
\|}$.
Thanks to the coupling with the branching process, we can prove that
$\|B^\ell B^{*\ell} P \chi \| \approx \tilde{\alpha}^{2\ell}$ and
moreover, we have for $e\in \vec E$,
\begin{eqnarray}
\frac{(B^\ell B^{*\ell} P \chi)_e}{\tilde{\alpha}^{2\ell}} \approx
\frac{\tilde{\alpha}}{\alpha(1-2\epsilon)^2-1}X(\infty),
\label{eq:eigapp}
\end{eqnarray}
where $X(\infty)$ is the limit of the martingale defined above and has
mean one. We can now translate this result to the eigenvector of the
original non-backtracking operator thanks to (\ref{eq:trans}):
$v_e=\sigma_{e_2}x_e$ where $x_e$ is approximated by
(\ref{eq:eigapp}).
In particular, we see that $\sum_{e,e_2=v}v_e$ is correlated with $\sigma_{v}$.
\begin{figure}[!t]
\includegraphics[scale=0.55]{Fig_B.pdf}
\caption{Spectrum of the non-backtracking matrix in the complex plane
for a problem generated with $\epsilon=0.25$, $n=2000$. We used
$\alpha=3$ (left side) and $\alpha=8$ (right side), to be compared
with $\alpha_{\rm detect}=4$. Each point represents an eigenvalue. In
both cases, the bulk of the spectrum is confined in a circle of
radius $\sqrt{\alpha}$. However, when $\alpha>\alpha_{\rm detect}$,
a single isolated eigenvalue appears out of the bulk at
$(1-2\epsilon)\alpha$ (see the arrow on the right plot) and the
corresponding eigenvector is correlated with the planted
assignement.}
\label{fig:spectrum}
\end{figure}
\section{From the non-backtracking operator to the Bethe Hessian}
\label{sec:BH}
In this section, we relate the spectra of ${\rm H}$, ${\rm B}$ and
${\rm B'}$ by generalizing some properties discussed in
\cite{krzakala2013spectral,saade2014spectral}.
$(\lambda\neq\pm1,v\in\mathbb{R}^{2m})$ being an eigenpair of
${\rm B}$, we define
\begin{equation} v_{i}=\underset{j\in\partial i}{\sum}
v_{j\rightarrow i},\qquad \forall 1\leq i\leq n\,. \end{equation}
Since
$\lambda v_{i\to j} = \sum_{k \in \partial i \backslash j} J_{ki} v_{k \to i} $
it follows that $\lambda v_{i\to j}=v_i - J_{ij} v_{j \to i}$. Closing
the equation on the single site elements $v_i$ thus leads to
\begin{equation}
\label{key-eq}
v_i
\(( 1 + \sum_{k \in \partial i} \frac {J_{ij}^2}{\lambda-J_{ij}^2} \))
- \lambda \sum_{k \in \partial i} \frac {J_{ij}}{\lambda-J_{ij}^2} v_k
=0 \,. \end{equation}
For convenience, we now define the matrix:
\begin{align}
{\rm H(X)}=(X^2-1)\mathds{1}-XJ+D
\end{align}
Note in particular that the Bethe Hessian reads
${\rm H}={\rm H}(\sqrt{\alpha})$. Given that the values of $J_{ij}$
are $\pm1$, all eigenvalues of ${\rm B}$ different from $\pm1$ thus must
satisfies the following generalization of the Ihara-Bass
formula\cite{bass1992ihara} :
\begin{align}
\label{ihara-bass}
\det\left[ (\lambda^2-1)\mathds{1}-\lambda J+D \right]= \det {\rm H}(\lambda)=0\,.
\end{align}
To solve (\ref{key-eq}) one needs to find an eigenvector $\bf {v}$ of
${\rm H}(\lambda)$ with a zero eigenvalue. This is a quadratic eigenproblem, which can be turned into a linear one by introducing the matrix ${\rm B^\prime}$ of Algo. 1. Indeed, if
$\lambda\in\mathbb{R}$ is an eigenvalue of ${\rm B^\prime}$ with
eigenvector $v^\prime$, then it follows that
$v:=\{v^\prime_i\}_{n+1\leq i\leq 2n}$ is an eigenvector of
${\rm H}(\lambda)$ with eigenvalue $0$, so that $\lambda$ is an
eigenvalue of ${\rm B}$ as well (at least if $\lambda \neq \pm 1$), justifying eq. (\ref{vectorsBprime1},\ref{vectorsBprime2}).
Note that since we are
interested in values of $\lambda>1$ (since $\lambda>\alpha$ and we need
$\alpha>1$ from (\ref{transition})), the limitation of looking at
$\lambda \neq \pm1$ is irrelevant.
Finally, following \cite{saade2014spectral}, we can relate the
spectra of ${\rm B}$ and ${\rm H}$ by the following argument. For $X$
large enough, ${\rm H}(X)$ is positive definite. Then as $X$
decreases, ${\rm H}(X)$ will gain a new negative eigenvalue whenever
$X$ becomes equal to an eigenvalue of ${\rm B}$. This justifies the
following corollary: \begin{corollary} if the conditions of
Theorem 1 apply, then ${\rm H}={\rm H}(\sqrt{\alpha})$ has a unique
negative eigenvalue if $\alpha>\alpha_{\rm detect}$, and none
otherwise.\end{corollary}
Strictly speaking, if we denote by $\lambda_1$ the leading eigenvalue
of ${\rm B}$, we have only shown that the eigenvector with eigenvalue
$0$ of ${\rm H}(\lambda_1)$ is positively correlated with the planted
variables if $\alpha>\alpha_{\rm detect}$. However, we observe
numerically (see figure \ref{fig:overlap}) that the eigenvector with
negative eigenvalue of ${\rm H}$ is also positively correlated, and in
fact gives a slightly better overlap. This point will have to be
clarified in future work.
It is worth noting the Bethe Hessian is also related to the belief propagation algorithm. \cite{yedidia2001bethe} showed that the fixed
points of the BP recursion are stationary points of the so-called
Bethe free energy. Direct optimization of the Bethe free energy has
then been proposed as an alternative to BP
\cite{welling2001belief}. In this context, \cite{saade2014spectral}
showed that the so-called paramagnetic fixed point (corresponding to an
uninformative assignment) is a local minimum of the Bethe free
energy if and only if ${\rm H}$ is positive definite. Algo. 2 can
therefore be seen as a spectral relaxation of the direct optimization
of the Bethe free energy. In the end, both approaches are indeed deeply
related to BP.
\iffalse
\subsection{Relation with the Bethe free energy}
A standard approach to solve the inference problem $(\ref{ising},\ref{bayes_optimal})$ is the Bethe approximation \cite{mezard2009information,yedidia2001bethe}.
Here I plan on writing the Bethe free energy for the inference problem, and explaining that ${\rm H}$ is positive definite if and only if the paramagnetic point is a local minimum.
\fi
\section{Conclusion}
We have considered the problem of partially recovering binary
variables from the observation of censored edge weights, and described
two optimal spectral algorithms for this task that can provably
perform partial recovery as soon as it is information theoretically
possible to do so. Remarkably, these algorithms do not require the
knowledge of the noise parameter $\epsilon$ and perform almost as well as
belief propagation, which is expected (but not proved) to be Bayes
optimal for this problem. This allows to close the gap from previous
works, both algorithmically, by providing optimal spectral algorithms,
and theoretically, by proving that the transition (\ref{transition})
is a necessary {\it and} sufficient condition for partial recovery.
\balance
\section*{Acknowledgment}
This work has been supported by the ERC under the European Union's FP7
Grant Agreement 307087-SPARCS and by the French Agence Nationale de la
Recherche under reference ANR-11-JS02-005-01 (GAP project).
|
\section{Introduction}
It is well established that to produce a flare requires magnetic free energy stored in the form of nonpotential coronal magnetic field (supported by coronal electric currents), which is somehow released and converted into other forms of energy---kinetic, thermal, and nonthermal. This process of magnetic energy release is commonly referred to as magnetic reconnection.
Flaring energy release is necessarily an extended process. Indeed, to supply a large flare with an energy of $\sim10^{32}$~erg at the expense of magnetic energy dissipation, one needs a rather large volume. For example, $\sim10^{32}$~erg is roughly the energy contained in a $100$~G magnetic field in a volume $\sim 3\cdot10^{29}$~cm$^3$. Since only free (nonpotential) magnetic energy is available for release, {the energy release region must occupy an even larger volume.}
If the magnetic reconnection/energy release occurs in a given limited volume, it is reasonable to anticipate that the magnetic field strength, energy density, and the total energy all decrease during the energy release stage. Thus, to probe the very process of energy release and transformation to other forms, it would be highly desirable to track all the energy components in the flaring volume. This is, however, a highly complicated task \citep{Emslie_etal_2012}. Indeed, although the thermal energy could often be reliably estimated with the soft X-ray (SXR) emission and some other means, the other energy components are very difficult to precisely measure at the flare energy-release site.
The thermal flare energy can often be understood as the plasma response to accelerated particle input; the relationship commonly referred to as the Neupert effect \citep{1968ApJ...153L..59N}. However, there are cases (cold flares) when no detectable heating is observed in spite of highly efficient acceleration. In particular, in the 30 Jul 2002 cold flare we studied recently \citep{Fl_etal_2011} we found that almost all available electrons were accelerated. It was not possible, however, to construct the complete energy balance, because the fast electrons deposited their energy into the chromosphere, as confirmed by footpoint hard X-ray (HXR) emission, although no significant evaporation occurred, and diagnostics of the chromospheric response could not be measured.
From the gyrosynchrotron (GS) spectrum we estimated the magnetic field in the particle acceleration region, but obtained a magnetic field value that did not show any significant evolution. This can mean that, because the nonthermal electrons leave the acceleration region relatively quickly, and thus do not contribute to the total pressure in the flaring volume, the magnetic field is supported by {an} external pressure at roughly {its} original level.
On the other hand, in many events there is a preflare phase that is almost purely thermal \citep{Battaglia_etal_2009}, although showing a weak nonthermal component in many cases \citep{Asai_etal_2006, Asai_etal_2009, Altyntsev_etal_2012}. Since the nonthermal energy content is only minor over these preflare heating episodes, the nonthermal particles alone cannot account for the heating. Thus, the plasma must be somehow heated directly by the magnetic energy release, or indirectly, e.g., via dissipation of the turbulent motions and/or waves generated, perhaps, as a result of the magnetic energy release. But this implies that there can be cases when the nonthermal component is essentially nonexistent over the entire event duration, which would be
{manifested} as {a} purely thermal event.
Indeed, such cases have been observed in both microwave and X-ray domains. In particular, \citet{Gary_Hurford_1989} reported a simple microwave burst showing the spectral shape consistent with being produced by a purely thermal plasma (with a Maxwellian distribution without any nonthermal tail) over the entire evolution of the flare. From the sequence of spectral fits they evaluated the characteristic magnetic field at the radio source to be roughly constant at the level of $\sim770$~G.
Recently, \citet{liu_etal_2013} reported a thermal flare that occurred in a low-lying coronal loop. They derived evolution of the plasma temperature, but no direct data on the magnetic field at the source was available {due to lack of radio observations}.
Microwave data offer diagnostics of both magnetic field and thermal plasma. For a purely thermal flare the microwave emission is produced by a combination of the thermal GS plus free-free emissions.
As an example, Figure~\ref{Fig_spectrum_example} displays microwave spectra from a given volume uniformly filled with a hot plasma with various temperatures and having uniform magnetic field. The {exact} spectr{a (thin lines)} consist of a number of peaks corresponding to gyroharmonics (integer multiples of the gyrofrequency), whose flux level increases with frequency at low frequencies, where the emission at each gyroharmonic is optically thick and the corresponding brightness temperature is just the plasma kinetic temperature; thus the average flux level rises as $\propto f^2$. Then, above a certain frequency, which increases as the temperature and/or magnetic field increases, the emission becomes optically thin and so the flux level decreases quickly; thus, at even higher frequencies the flux level is determined by the optically thin free-free emission, which yields a flat spectrum at high frequencies.
{I}solated gyroharmonic emission has
been reported {for non-flaring active regions} \citep{Lang_etal_1987, Bogod_etal_2000}, and
from solar flares {\citep{Benka_Holman_1992}, but such reports are rare} because the magnetic field is spatially nonuniform at the radio source. Even a relatively minor nonuniformity of the magnetic field will smooth the isolated harmonics{, thus the thin line curves in Figure~\ref{Fig_spectrum_example} are essentially unobservable in most cases. Instead,}
a continuum thermal spectrum {is observed (thick lines in Figure~\ref{Fig_spectrum_example}),} with flux density $\propto f^2$ at low frequencies, where the emission is optically thick, and a rapid (exponent-like) drop-off at higher frequencies, where the emission is optically thin; the falling part of the gyro-spectrum then gives way to a flat free-free spectrum.
The spectral peak of the thermal GS emission allows a precise measurement of the maximum magnetic field at the source, while the level of the optically thick part of the spectrum depends only on the product of the plasma temperature and source area. Above the spectral peak the microwave spectrum is flat due to the optically thin free-free emission at the level defined by the plasma density and temperature. Thus, microwave observations of a purely thermal source offer a straightforward way of estimating physical parameters needed to study the energy balance and evolution in such events. \cite{Altyntsev_etal_2012} have demonstrated the ability of thermal GS emission to yield magnetic field diagnostics at the energy release site. However, they used microwave data from a few discrete frequencies provided by the Nobeyama Radio Polarimeters (NoRP), RSTN, and Siberian Solar Radio Telescope (SSRT). As a result, the microwave spectral peak could not be precisely determined, which is needed for precise magnetic field diagnostics.
Here we use spectrally resolved Owens Valley Solar Array (OVSA) observations that provide us with much better measurements of the spectr{al} shape sufficient to firmly constrain the source parameters such as temperature by area product and the magnetic field. We also use these exceptionally clean spectra as an opportunity to investigate the potential influence of a slight non-Maxwellian distribution, in the form of the kappa distribution.
\begin{figure} \centering
\includegraphics[width=0.32\columnwidth,clip]{Thermal_spectrum_4_230.eps}
\includegraphics[width=0.32\columnwidth,clip]{Thermal_spectrum_8_230.eps}
\includegraphics[width=0.32\columnwidth,clip]{Thermal_spectrum_16_230.eps}
\includegraphics[width=0.32\columnwidth,clip]{Thermal_spectrum_40_130.eps}
\includegraphics[width=0.32\columnwidth,clip]{Thermal_spectrum_32_230.eps}
\includegraphics[width=0.32\columnwidth,clip]{Thermal_spectrum_40_230.eps}
\caption{\label{Fig_spectrum_example} Model GS + free-free spectra from a uniform plasma volume computed with an exact expressions \citep[specifically, the hybrid fast GS code,][thin curves]{Fl_Kuzn_2010} and continuous approximation (thick curves). The adopted parameters are: area $A=1600''^2$, depth $d=10''$, plasma density $n_0 = 10^{10}$~cm$^{-3}$, and viewing angle $\theta=75^\circ$. Values of the plasma temperature $T$ and magnetic field $B$ are shown in the panels. Note, that for a given magnetic field, the spectrum peak increases when the temperature increases. Thus, having a constant spectral peak while the plasma heating requires a corresponding decrease of the magnetic filed.
}
\end{figure}
\section{Observations}
The period of thermal emission that we study manifested during the decay phase of one of the largest flares of solar cycle 23, the GOES soft X-ray class X14.4 event of 2001 Apr 15 that peaked $\sim$~13:45~UT (Figure~\ref{fig_OVSA_dynspec}a), and was spatially associated with the post-flare loops of that event. However, we believe the thermal event should more-properly be considered as a 'precursor'
of a much smaller event that peaked $\sim$~17:00~UT (Figure~\ref{fig_OVSA_dynspec}b-c). Figure~\ref{fig_OVSA_dynspec}b shows the Stokes $I$ total power dynamic spectrum at 16:38-17:30 UT from the Owens Valley Solar Array \citep[OVSA;][]{ovsa_1984, Gary_Hurford_1994}, obtained from 40 frequencies roughly logarithmically spaced over the range 1-18~GHz. To aid in visibility of the emission, the corresponding 2.4~GHz Stokes I total power lightcurve is shown in Figure~\ref{fig_OVSA_dynspec}c. No significant circular polarization was seen during the event. The spectral shape of the emission, as we will show shortly, is consistent with purely thermal gyrosynchrotron emission during the small, isolated peak to the left of the dashed line in Figure~\ref{fig_OVSA_dynspec}b-c (16:40-16:48 UT), then it becomes increasingly nonthermal during the time to the right of the dashed line, leading up to the event peaking at 17:00~UT. Figure~\ref{fig_OVSA_dynspec}d-e show the OVSA dynamic spectrum and 2.4~GHz lightcurve for the period of the thermal flare, from 16:38-16:48~UT. The narrow-band nature of the emission in Figure~\ref{fig_OVSA_dynspec}d is striking. One sometimes sees highly nonthermal, coherent plasma emission in the decimeter range below 3~GHz \citep{Nita_etal_2004},
which OVSA's frequency and time resolution may not resolve. However, Figure~\ref{fig_OVSA_dynspec}f shows much higher frequency- and time-resolution data from the Ondrejov observatory \citep{ondrejov}, on the same time scale as Figure~\ref{fig_OVSA_dynspec}d-e. The Ondrejov data confirm the smooth continuum nature of the emission, consistent with our interpretation of thermal gyrosynchrotron emission, and eliminates the possibility that the radio spectrum is affected by coherent plasma emission, which would be a signature of nonthermal particles.
\begin{figure} \centering
\includegraphics[width=0.96\columnwidth,clip]{thermal_flare_fig1.5.eps}
\caption{\label{fig_OVSA_dynspec}The thermal flare event in the context of other radio activity. (a) The GOES (1-8 \AA) soft X-ray light curve spanning 12 hours (1200-2400~UT) on 2001 Apr 15, showing the large (X14.4) flare peaking around 13:50~UT and its long decay. The vertical dashed lines show the timerange shown in b-c. (b) The OVSA dynamic spectrum from 1-18~GHz from 1640-1730~UT, showing the narrowband thermal flare (left of the white dashed line) and an increasingly nonthermal preflare phase leading to a larger event peaking at 1700 UT. (c) The 2.4~GHz lightcurve corresponding to b. To the left of the vertical dashed line is the timerange of the thermal flare shown in d-e. (d) The OVSA dynamic spectrum from 1-18~GHz from 1638-1648~UT, showing the narrow-band thermal flare, visible only in the range 1.0-3.2~GHz. (e) The 2.4~GHz lightcurve corresponding to d. (f) The 1-2~GHz dynamic spectrum from Ondrejov on the same timescale as in d-e. The horizontal and vertical lines are instrumental artifacts.
}
\end{figure}
\subsection{Context Observations}
The Transition Region And Coronal Explorer \citep[TRACE;][]{trace} and Solar Heliospheric Observatory \citep[SoHO;][]{soho,soho_eit} targeted this AR and revealed a system of postflare coronal loops from the X14.4 event. The radio burst originated from the same area, but it is not possible to associate the radio source with a given single EUV loop, and in fact, as we will see, the radio source is far hotter than these EUV-emitting post-flare loops. Figure~\ref{fig_OVSA_imaging}a-c show three of the TRACE EUV wavelengths, 171~\AA\ (panel a), 195~\AA\ (panel b), and 284~\AA\ (panel c). The TRACE images were greatly affected by high-energy particle noise from the earlier X14.4 flare, hence we have processed the images with the eit\_despeckle routine from the Solar Software (SSW) IDL package. The images show a system of post-flare loops with bright tops centrally located over the active region, with more diffuse loops to both the north and south. Both footpoints of the post-flare loops appear to be on the disk, just inside the limb.
Hydrogen-alpha images from Big Bear Solar Observatory (BBSO) are available at 16:00 and 17:00 UT. We show in Figure~\ref{fig_OVSA_imaging}d the relevant portion of the 16:00 UT H$\alpha$ image, showing an earlier stage of post-flare loops. The BBSO H$\alpha$ image at 17:00 UT shows that the loops with the bright-looptops have migrated southward by then.
\begin{figure} \centering
\includegraphics[width=0.96\columnwidth]{thermal_flare_fig2.eps}\\
\caption{\label{fig_OVSA_imaging} Radio images and other context imaging data. (a) 1.2~GHz OVSA (contours) on top of TRACE 171~\AA\ (image), (b) 1.4~GHz OVSA (contours) on top of TRACE 195~\AA\ (image), (c) 1.8~GHz OVSA (contours) on top of TRACE 284~\AA\ (image), and (d) OVSA 50\% contour at each of 1.2 (red), 1.4 (orange), 1.8 (yellow), 2.4 (green) and 3.2~GHz (blue), on top of BBSO H$_\alpha$ (image), showing a slight dispersion in position with frequency. {See on-line movies showing the source variation either with frequency or with time.}
}
\end{figure}
\subsection{OVSA Imaging and Relative Visibility}
\label{S_OVSA_Imaging}
As shown in Figure~\ref{fig_OVSA_dynspec}, the OVSA radio burst has significant flux density only in the range 1.2--3.2~GHz. Figure~\ref{fig_OVSA_imaging} displays a summary of the OVSA imaging at 1.2--3.2~GHz at the peak time of the flare, $\sim$16:42:35~UT, overlaid on the four panels mentioned above. Panels a-c show contours at 20, 40, 60 and 80\% of the peak intensity for 1.2~GHz (panel a), 1.4~GHz (panel b), and 1.8~GHz (panel c). The dashed ellipses in each panel show the sythesized half-power beam size. Figure~\ref{fig_OVSA_imaging}d shows the relationships of source position and size for the range of frequencies of the burst, as 50\% contours at 1.2~GHz (red), 1.4~GHz (orange), 1.8~GHz (yellow), 2.4~GHz (green) and 3.2~GHz (blue); { see the on-line movie for greater detail}. The half-power synthesized beam (dashed ellipse) shown in this panel is for the frequency 2.4~GHz. We have studied the time evolution of the burst at each frequency, and find no significant change of position; { see the on-line movie for greater detail}. The sources at each frequency rise and fall in intensity from a single location over the 4-5~minute duration of the burst.
The radio sources are spatially associated with the centrally-located post-flare loops--those with bright EUV emission at the loop-tops. As we will see shortly, the radio spectrum of the burst is consistent with purely thermal gyrosynchrotron emission from a homogeneous source. However, such a source should have a fixed location and frequency-independent source size, seemingly at odds with the frequency-dependent source sizes and locations shown in Figure~\ref{fig_OVSA_imaging}d. Of course, much of the source variation could be due to convolution of the source with the frequency-dependent synthesized beam (point spread function). To check this, we used the simple analytical deconvolution approach of \citet{1970AuJPh..23..113W},
which allowed us to use the known 2d-gaussian parameters of the synthesized beam and those of the observed source to derive the parameters of the deconvolved source (semi-major axes $a$ and $b$, and orientation), from which the deconvolved source area $\pi ab$ could be determined. The results of this analysis
still yield a frequency-dependent \textit{deconvolved} source size ("observed" column of Table~\ref{table}). However, the OVSA interferometric array comprises only 6 antennas, one of which suffered from instrumental effects and was flagged from the data. Instantaneous (snapshot) imaging with such a small number of antennas (5) provides only a small number of constraints on source parameters, which may be insufficient for an unambiguous determination of deconvolved source size. To check this possibility, we used the uvmodel routine from the Miriad package \citep{Sault_ea_2011}
to create a model visibility database using a 2-d gaussian source with fixed source size vs. frequency (we chose the deconvolved 1.8~GHz source area $\pi a b = 4113$~sq. arcsec, with $a = 39.1\arcsec$ and $b = 33.5\arcsec$). We then sampled the model visibilities with the OVSA antenna spacings. This model database was then used to create simulated OVSA images, which were deconvolved in the same way as the original OVSA images. Table~\ref{table} shows the comparison of the original deconvolved source area vs. frequency with that of the simulated images. It is clear that the same decrease of source area with frequency is seen in both cases, despite the fact that the simulation source model has a constant area. This implies that determining the source area from the 6-antenna OVRO imaging observations is not reliable, but also that the observations {do not rule out} a roughly constant source size with frequency, as expected for a thermal source. We will come back to this point in sections~\ref{S_sp_relat} \& \ref{S_Discussion}.
\begin{table}
\caption{ Table 1: Comparison of deconvolved source size for observations and simulation }
\label{table}
\begin{tabular}{cccc}
\hline
Freq. & Size Observed & Size Simulated & $\phi$ Observed \\
(GHz) & (arcsec$^2$) & (arcsec$^2$) & (degrees) \\
\hline
1.2 & 12742 & 11097 & 346 \\
1.4 & 7241 & 7633 & 343 \\
1.6 & 5252 & 5013 & 345 \\
1.8 & 4113 & 3643 & 341 \\
2.0 & 3552 & 2995 & 329 \\
2.4 & 2301 & 2158 & 348 \\
2.6 & 1736 & 1780 & 355 \\
2.8 & 1205 & 1568 & 350 \\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\end{table}
Although we have found that the deconvolved source size is not reliable, it is interesting that the orientation of the convolved (observed) sources in Figure~\ref{fig_OVSA_imaging} is slightly different from the orientation of the beam. The \citet{1970AuJPh..23..113W}
deconvolution yields an orientation $\phi$ for the deconvolved source of around 345~deg (fourth column of Table~\ref{table}), which is nearly perpendicular to the limb, i.e., in the same direction as the slight dispersion in centroid height with frequency shown in Figure~\ref{fig_OVSA_imaging}d. This may suggest a vertically-oriented hot loop with a slight frequency asymmetry, i.e. low frequencies tending to come from near the top and high frequencies from near the bottom. However, as we shall see {later}, any such inhomogeneity must be slight enough not to broaden the total power radio spectrum significantly. Stated another way, although the imaging data imply that the sources at different frequencies are displaced relative to each other, they must all have roughly the same effective areas.
{Given the deconvolved source sizes are not reliable, we can study the frequency dependence of the relative visibilities to determine the source size assuming that there is a single source at all frequencies, as in another similar case reported by \citet{Gary_Hurford_1989}. Recall that the relative visibility is the ratio of baseline amplitude to the square-root of the product of the total power on the two antennas corresponding to that baseline. It has the advantage that it is independent of calibration. What one expects to see for a source of constant size \citep[see][]{Gary_Hurford_1989} is a constant \textit{negative slope} vs. frequency$^2$, with the slope proportional to the size of the source. Contrary to expectations, however, this procedure yields on all baselines a steadily \textit{rising} relative visibility to 3 GHz (points above this are just noise, since the spectrum dies above this). If taken at face value, this implies a spatially-complex source. The relative visibility spectral shape is remarkably constant in time throughout the burst, so there is no indication that the source is changing size or shape with time.}
\begin{figure*}\centering
\qquad\includegraphics[width=0.89\textwidth]{small_loop_spectrum_r1.eps}
\includegraphics[width=0.92\textwidth]{small_loop_images.eps}
\caption{\label{fig_model_spectrum_images} A model thermal loop constructed to prove the feasibility of the 'gyro-stripe' model concept. We used a nonlinear force-free extrapolated magnetic data cube obtained for AR 12158 based on the HMI vector magnetogram taken close to the disk center on September 10, 2014. Using the GX Simulator tool \citep{Nita_etal_2015} we selected a magnetic flux tube, rotated the data cube to the western limb, and restricted the field of view to observe the emission from a fraction of the loop seen in the upper left panel. Then, the emission was computed using the 'hybrid' (containing the gyroharmonics) version of the fast code \citep{Fl_Kuzn_2010} to obtain the spectrum (upper right) and the radio images at different frequencies. The set of images (see on-line movie for better impression) proves that the sources at different frequencies can be (i) complex, i.e., consist of a few gyro-stripes embedded in a weaker and more diffuse continuum, (ii) displaced relative to each other, while (iii) have roughly same area and (iv) produce an integrated spectrum (upper right) that nicely fits the observed spectrum, thus, emulating a uniform thermal source. {Note that in a general case the model integrated spectrum will be broader than the observed narrow quasi-uniform thermal spectrum.}
}
\end{figure*}
\subsection{Understanding the spatial relationships}
\label{S_sp_relat}
{Putting all of the evidence together, we get a picture of a spectral shape and temporal behavior consistent with a relatively compact source of uniform area, but with contrary spatial information that instead indicates a source with significant spatial complexity. We have insufficient information to be definitive as to how to resolve this quandary, but one possibility is that we are observing the manifestation of discrete gyro-layers expected for non-uniform sources,
coming from the harmonic spectral features shown in Figure~\ref{Fig_spectrum_example}. Such features have been suggested before \citep{Kuznetsov_etal_2011},
as shown in the movie accompanying the online version of this paper, some frames of which are shown in Figure~\ref{fig_model_spectrum_images}. Under certain special conditions (which could account for the rarity of such events), the total emitting area of such a non-uniform source, made up of up to 5-7 gyro-layers, could be remarkably constant with frequency over some restricted range, such as the 1.2--3.2~GHz range of the present event, but the centroid of the emission at different frequencies can be displaced following the apparent spatial displacement of the gyro stripes as a function of frequency. Generally, contributions from two different legs of the loop can broaden the spectrum. However, for a loop observed 'edge-on' at the limb---the geometry supported by the recovered source position angle and the source displacement with frequency---the farthest leg can be occulted by the closest one; so only the leg closest to the observer contributes to the spectrum. We return to this point later.
Attempting detailed modeling of this, however, is not well constrained by the data and so beyond the scope of this paper, but the proof-of-concept test in Figure~\ref{fig_model_spectrum_images} suggests that it is feasible.}
\section{Radio Spectral Fit}
\label{S_R_spectral_fit}
\subsection{Fitting framework}
In most of the time frames {(see symbols with error bars in Figure~\ref{fig_fit_example})} the microwave spectrum of the burst {rises with frequency $\propto f^2$ at low frequencies until}
terminated by a very sharp, almost exponential cutoff, which then gives way to a roughly flat flux level at the correspondingly higher frequencies. Such a spectrum
can be fit perfectly by a combination of gyrosynchrotron and free-free emissions from a purely thermal {source with quasi-uniform area as a function of frequency}, where the gyro emission is responsible for the low-frequency, relatively narrowband spectral peak, while the optically thin free-free emission is responsible for the higher-frequency broadband background.
Within this spectral model, the low-frequency region, $\propto f^2$, represents the optically thick thermal gyro emission, thus, the flux level is defined solely by the product of the source area $A$ and the plasma temperature $T$, $F\propto A\cdot T$. In particular, knowing the plasma temperature, e.g., from X-ray data allows estimating the source area \citep{Altyntsev_etal_2012}, while having {information} on the source size allows reading the plasma temperature from the spectrum directly \citep{Gary_Hurford_1989}. There {are} no X-ray data {available} to derive the plasma temperature {for this event}, so we must rely on the {other constraints for} the source size. As has been said in Section~\ref{S_OVSA_Imaging}, the estimate of the source area is not {reliable.}
It is important, however, that the imaging data do not suggest any noticeable change in the source size or position with time{, while at the same time the narrow spectral shape suggests that the source area cannot vary too much with frequency, as any appreciable variation will broaden the radio spectrum}.
In addition, analysis of the relative visibilities suggests a noticeable spatial complexity of the radio source, which, all together, drove us to a 'gyro-stripe' model envisioned in Sec~\ref{S_sp_relat}, thus, implying the effective source area to comprise only a fraction of the deconvolved source area.
Accordingly, we {loosely} adopt {an area of $A_m = 1600\arcsec^2$,
which is roughly 40\% of the deconvolved source area found at 1.8~GHz, $A_0 = \pi(39.1\arcsec\times 33.5\arcsec) = 4113\arcsec^2$. One has to keep
in mind that any temperatures derived from this assumption should be scaled by $A_m/A$, where $A$ is the true source area. The}
source depth is adopted to be $20\arcsec$, which is an appropriately scaled {deconvolved} source width
(the exact value of the source depth is {unimportant}; for example, very similar results would be obtained for $10\arcsec$ depth, see Figure~\ref{Fig_spectrum_example}).
A striking feature of this radio burst is nearly perfect constancy of the spectral peak. Indeed, for a thermal source with {constant size,}
the increase of the flux level can only be provided by {an increase in plasma temperature.}
In a source with a constant magnetic field, this plasma heating must necessarily result in the corresponding increase of the spectrum peak, see Figure~\ref{Fig_spectrum_example}. Thus, the aforementioned constancy of the spectral peak at the radio emitting volume implies {a corresponding} decrease of the magnetic field {over} the course of the plasma heating.
\begin{figure}\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.85\columnwidth]{fit_example_2001_Apr_15_1_Tkap.eps}
\caption{\label{fig_fit_example} Examples of the spectrum fits. See the on-line set for the entire flare duration. {Only two significant digits of $\kappa$ are kept.}
}
\end{figure}
\subsection{Fit to Maxwellian Plasma}
\label{S_M_plasma_fit}
To perform the sequential spectral fit \citep{Bastian_etal_2007, Fl_etal_2009, Fl_etal_2013, Gary_etal_2013} we apply a homogeneous source model with constant depth $20''$ and area $1600''^2$ and three unknown free parameters $B(t)$, $T(t)$, and $n_{th}(t)$, the magnetic field, plasma temperature, and density respectively. Selection of the objective function to be forward fit requires some further discussion in this case. Indeed, the gyro emission from a truly homogeneous thermal source (with a unique single magnetic field value), called gyroresonance (GR) emission, would represent a number of distinct narrow peaks occurring around a few small integer multiples of the gyrofrequency (gyroharmonics), Figure~\ref{Fig_spectrum_example}, although a realistic variation of the magnetic field along the line of sight smooths these peaks out to form a continuum spectrum. Formation of such a continuous spectrum is accounted for by the theory of GR emission, which properly takes into account the magnetic field variation along the line of sight \citep[e.g.,][]{Zheleznyakov_1970} and has been widely applied to the solar active regions \citep{Aliss_1984, Akhmedov_etal_1986, Gary_Hurford_1994, Gary_Hurford_2004, Peterova_etal_2006, Lee_2007, RATAN, Tun_etal_2011, Nita_etal_2011, Kaltman_etal_2012}. For the purpose of the practical forward fit there is no need to include the magnetic field nonuniformity explicitly. Instead, we can use the continuous version of the fast GS code \citep{Fl_Kuzn_2010} from a homogeneous source, which automatically performs the required averaging. We checked via modeling that the results of these two approaches agree very well to each other.
We performed the fit of the observed sequence of the microwave spectra to the continuous fast GS code with the Maxwellian distribution of the radiating electrons using the simplex method with shaking, which proved to work remarkably well for the microwave spectra \citep{Fl_etal_2009, Fl_etal_2013, Gary_etal_2013}. The weights of the individual data points were calculated taking into account the mismatches between different OVSA antenna measurements at the given frequency and time frame. As has been said, there are three free parameters of the model, $B(t)$, $T(t)$, and $n_{th}(t)$, whose evolution we recovered from the sequential fit. The fit is successful throughout the entire burst duration; examples of the fit are given in Fig.~\ref{fig_fit_example} by black solid curves.
\subsection{Fit to a Plasma with Kappa Distribution}
Interestingly, with this set of the microwave spectra we can address the question of how precisely the Maxwellian distribution is maintained in the radio source. To do so we perform a similar sequential fit but in this case assuming the kappa distribution \citep{vasyliunas68, owocki83, Maksimovic_etal_1997, livadiotis09, pierrard10} of the plasma instead of the Maxwellian one. The kappa distribution {\citep[of the second kind in the notation of][]{livadiotis09}} contains one more free parameter, the index $\kappa$, compared with the Maxwellian distribution, \citep[for the microwave emission, produced by these distributions, see][and references therein]{Chiuderi_Drago_2004, Fl_Kuzn_2010, Fl_Kuzn_2014}. {In a spatially uniform source, t}he value of the index $\kappa$ can be used as a measure of the deviation of the actual plasma distribution from the Maxwellian one in such a way that the kappa distribution with large $\kappa$ is very similar to the Maxwellian one, while that with small $\kappa$ is markedly different from it. {For example, \citet{2014ApJ...796..142B} have proposed that the kappa distribution can represent a solution of a transport equation for nonthermal electrons in a dense acceleration region, while \citet{2015ApJ...799..129O} found that the X-ray spectra from above-the-loop-top (Masuda) sources can be well fit with the kappa distribution with indices in the range 4--14, although even smaller $\kappa$ indices have been reported by \citet{2009A&A...497L..13K} for the coronal loop-top sources. On the other hand, in a \mw\ total power spectrum, spatial nonuniformity can mimic the effect of finite kappa, i.e. the spectrum of a thermal source will be broadened by the nonuniformity compared with the thermal spectral shape discussed in section~\ref{S_M_plasma_fit}. We checked, via similar modeling to that presented in Fig.~\ref{fig_model_spectrum_images}, that the kappa distribution can often provide an appropriate fit to the total power spectrum from a nonuniform source, even though filled with a purely Maxwellian thermal plasma. Having in mind both of these possibilities, we apply the kappa-distribution fit phenomenologically, without immediate implication for the non-Maxwellian nature of the plasma or the source nonuniformity. }
The fit examples with the kappa distribution are given by the solid green lines in Fig.~\ref{fig_fit_example} along with the $\kappa$ indices obtained for each time frame. Note, that for $\kappa\gtrsim 15-20$ the microwave spectra produced by either Maxwellian or kappa distribution are visually indistinguishable in Fig.~\ref{fig_fit_example} from each other{---the corresponding kappa area is marked yellow in the kappa-index panel of Fig.~\ref{fig_OVSA_fit_parms}}; stated another way the electron energy distribution in the radio source is comparably consistent with both the Maxwellian distribution and the kappa distribution with a reasonably large index over most of the flare duration. However, at the late decay phase the fit with kappa distribution (with progressively smaller $\kappa$ indices) is formally preferable as it yields a significantly smaller $\chi^2$ measure. Nevertheless, we believe that this does not necessarily indicate a corresponding change of the (local) thermal electron energy distribution, but rather implies a progressively enhanced role of the source nonuniformity due presumably to differing cooling speeds of the adjacent fluxtubes forming the radio source. This further implies that the kappa distribution instead of the Maxwellian one can successfully be used for analysis of the thermal flares with significant spatial nonuniformity.
\subsection{Fit Results}
Figure~\ref{fig_OVSA_fit_parms} displays evolution of the fit parameters $B(t)$, $T(t)$, and $n_{th}(t)$ (and the $\kappa$ index in case of kappa distribution) and also the energy densities along with a few radio light curves shown for the reference. The derived plasma temperature, which is almost identical for both Maxwellian and kappa fits, displays clear rise, extended peak, and decay phases indicative of the plasma heating, saturation, and cooling. The plasma density displays a similar rise-peak-decay pattern although with noticeably larger scatter of the individual data points; the origin of this scatter is apparent: the number density estimate comes from the flat level of the microwave spectrum at high frequencies, where it is measured with large uncertainties. In contrast to these plasma parameters, the magnetic field displays remarkably different behavior: it goes down, stays relatively small, and then increases back to almost original values in case of Maxwellian fit, but in case of the kappa fit it remains at a relatively low level up to the late decay phase.
\begin{figure}\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.75\columnwidth]{true_fit_parms_2001_Apr_15_1_Tkap.eps}
\caption{\label{fig_OVSA_fit_parms} Radio source parameters as derived from the OVSA spectral fit for three parameters of the thermal GS + free-free source. Two top panels show the radio light curves at a few frequencies indicated in the plots. The third right panel displays the index of kappa-distribution derived from the fit. {The yellow area indicates the $\kappa$ values that give a distribution indistinguishable from the Maxwellian one; the $\kappa$ uncertainties are of the order of the $\kappa$ values or larger in this area. Below the yellow area the formal uncertainties of the $\kappa$ index are about 10\% and are within the symbol size.} The lower left panel shows evolution of the energy densities: magnetic (circles) and thermal (plus signs) energy densities as derived from Maxwellian fit and their sum (asterisks) as well as the sum derived from the kappa-distribution fit (green asterisks). The last panel shows the $\chi^2$ evolution for these two fits.
}
\end{figure}
Interestingly, to obtain a good fit a significant variation of the magnetic field at the source is unavoidable. It is tempting to conclude that we detect here the very process of the magnetic to thermal energy conversion; perhaps, due to the magnetic reconnection process. However, such a straightforward conclusion looks unwarranted: although the thermal energy density does go up as the magnetic one declines at the flare rise phase, this is insufficient to make up for the magnetic energy density deficit.
Furthermore, the very process of the magnetic to thermal energy conversion would imply the magnetic energy decrease when the plasma temperature keeps roughly constant during the extended peak of the burst to make up for the
significant conductive losses (see next Section); however, the sum of the magnetic and thermal energy keeps remarkably constant there, which requires another energy source to compensate for this loss.
A more likely scenario comes from the loop 'self-occultation' model envisioned in Sec~\ref{S_sp_relat}.
Let us consider a nested loop system, one above the other (with the outer ones having a progressively smaller magnetic field), seen edge-on.
Initially, when the temperature is small (coronal), the outer loops are transparent for the
radio emission at 1.2--2.6 GHz (the observed optically thick part of the spectrum), so we see emission from the most inner loop with the largest
magnetic field ($\sim 200-250$~G). Then the temperature in the outer loops start to grow and they become opaque sequentially---the larger the magnetic field in the given loop the sooner. This way the inner loops become occulted by the outer loop sequentially, so we observe emission from the most outer opaque loop; the hotter the loop the smaller the magnetic field that makes it opaque at the given frequency range; this is
why the fit gives us the proportionally smaller magnetic field for the progressively larger plasma temperature. Apparently, for this model to work we have to adopt that the outer loops are heated progressively stronger than the inner loops. This model is capable of explaining both constancy of the spectral peak during the heating-cooling evolution and constancy of the source location and area in time as observed. Although this 'fine-tuning' of the proposed model may look artificial, we can argue that having a truly exceptional event does require some really seldom combination of physical parameters and/or geometry.
\subsection{A Consistency Check}
The plasma cooling at the burst decay phase must be driven by either radiative or conductive cooling, whose characteristic time scales are strictly specified by the source sizes, temperature, and density defined above. The radiative cooling time \citep[e.g.,][]{Aschw_2005} for such a hot plasma ($T\sim40$~MK) is much longer than the observed one, $\tau\sim30$~s; thus the conductive cooling is likely to dominate. The conductive cooling time, $\tau_{cond}\approx L^2 \rho c_p/(\kappa_S T^{5/2})$ \citep[Eq (4.3.10) in][]{Aschw_2005}, where $L$ is the loop length, $\rho=n_e m_p$ is the plasma mass density, for the fully ionized hydrogen ideal gas $c_p\rho=5k_B n_e$, where $c_p=2\gamma k_B/[(\gamma-1)m_p]$~erg/(g$\cdot$K) is the specific heat, $\gamma=5/3$, and $\kappa_S\approx 9.2\cdot10^{-7}$~erg cm$^{-1}$ s$^{-1}$ K$^{-7/2}$ is the Spitzer conductivity coefficient \citep[see, e.g.,][]{Aschw_2005, FT_2013}. Solving for $T$ and substituting known constants, we find
\begin{equation}
\label{Eq_T_from_decay}
T\simeq 3.82\cdot10^7~[{\rm K}] \left(\frac{L}{6\cdot10^9~{\rm cm}}\right)^{4/5}\left(\frac{n_e}{10^{10}~{\rm cm}^{-3}}\right)^{2/5}
$$$$
\left(\frac{30~{\rm s}}{\tau}\right)^{2/5},
\end{equation}
which, for the observed source length $L\sim 6\cdot10^9~{\rm cm}$ and decay time scale $\tau\sim30$~s and the plasma density ${n_e}\sim 10^{10}~{\rm cm}^{-3}$ derived from the fit, yields the plasma temperature $T\sim40$~MK in full agreement with the numbers derived from the fit.
\section{Discussion}
\label{S_Discussion}
The ability to precisely derive two components of the flare energy density---the magnetic and thermal ones---in the event under study (where the third generally important energy component, the nonthermal one, is undetectable and so negligible) raises a question of how the energy is being transformed from one form to another and what are the means of the energy dissipation, escape, and build up.
There are two possible scenarios of the event: (1) there is a single (isolated) volume where all these energy transformations occur, in particular, where the magnetic energy is dissipated and then recovers back; or (2) the apparent source of the radio brightness moves in space; in particular, different magnetic field values obtained at different times pertain to physically different spatial locations (layers) rather than reflecting the time evolution of the magnetic field at a given layer.
\subsection{Scenario One: A Single Isolated Source}
In case of an isolated source, there must be a balance between its energy components, two of which are detected. The energy balance can be written in the form
\begin{equation}
\label{Eq_ener_balance}
\frac{d}{dt} \int\left(\frac{B^2(t)}{8\pi}+\frac{\rho(t) u^2(t)}{2} +3n_{th}(t)k_B T(t) \right)dV=\dot{E}_L,
\end{equation}
where $u(t)$ is the fluid velocity, the integration is performed over the source volume that can change over the course of the flare in a general case, but stays constant (at least, the source area) in our event as suggested by OVSA imaging, and $\dot{E}_L$ is the total energy loss rate, which includes the radiative and conductive losses; the factor of 3 in the third term is written in assumption of the thermal energy equipartition between electrons and ions. It is easy to estimate that both conductive and radiative losses can only remove a fraction of the thermal energy, which is itself small compared with the total energy dominated by the magnetic field. This means that with a good accuracy we can adopt
\begin{equation}
\label{Eq_ener_cons}
\int\left(\frac{B^2(t)}{8\pi}+\frac{\rho(t) u^2(t)}{2} +3n_{th}(t)k_B T(t) \right)dV={\rm const}.
\end{equation}
Now, for a source with a constant volume we must require that the sum of the mean energy densities is conserved:
\begin{equation}
\label{Eq_ener_density_cons}
\frac{B^2(t)}{8\pi}+\frac{\rho(t) u^2(t)}{2} +3n_{th}(t)k_B T(t)=\frac{B_0^2 }{8\pi}
$$$$
\approx 2.3\cdot10^3~{\rm erg~cm^{-3}},
\end{equation}
where $B_0$ is the initial magnetic field value at the source. It is easy to estimate that the thermal energy density ($\sim 1.6\cdot10^2$~erg~cm$^{-3}$ at the peak phase) is a minor fraction ($\sim$7\%) of the total energy density and so can be discarded in the zeroth approximation. Then, we note that the magnetic field at the peak phase of the burst is roughly two times smaller than the initial magnetic field value, see Figure~\ref{fig_OVSA_fit_parms}; thus, the magnetic energy density ($6.7\cdot10^2$~erg~cm$^{-3}$) contains only about 30\% of the original value so the remaining $\sim$70\% must be ascribed to the kinetic energy density, $\rho u^2/2~\sim 1.6\cdot10^3$~erg~cm$^{-3}$, within this model. Such an energy partition cannot be supplied, for example, by an ensemble of MHD waves: in the Alfv\'en wave the kinetic and magnetic energy densities equal to each other; thus, together with the mean magnetic field component, the magnetic energy density must dominate in case of the MHD waves. The dominance of the kinetic energy would imply that the plasma motions are supersonic and super-Alfv\'enic, i.e., the shock waves.
Although not firmly excluded, having such a strong kinetic velocity field in the entire volume seems unlikely for many reasons. One of them is a clear lack of the radio image evolution, which would be expected in the presence of multiple shock waves in the source volume. In addition, such a strong kinetic velocity field would efficiently accelerate the charged particles \citep{Byk_Fl_2009}, which is not observed either.
Finally, there is an option of changing volume (although not supported by observations), when the observed decrease of the magnetic energy density is compensated by the corresponding increase of the flare volume, i.e., the volume expansion. The volume expansion requires a corresponding net driving force. Conversion of the magnetic to thermal energy cannot produce this force since this conversion results in a decrease of the total pressure provided that the total energy is conserved. Thus, the volume expansion necessarily requires a decrease of the magnetic tensions, which can only be achieved through the magnetic reconnection process. This cannot be understood without considering a bigger volume than the immediate radio source.
\subsection{Scenario Two: an Open Source}
If we allow the source of the apparent radio brightness to move along the line of sight (recall, no displacement in the transverse direction is supported by observations) to illuminate different spatial layers with respectively various magnetic fields detected at the different time frames, we have to consider the energy balance in a bigger volume in which, however, we do not have direct information about spatial distribution of the magnetic field and thermal plasma. Instead, we consider three different stages of the burst---rise, peak, and decay.
During the rise phase we clearly detect the process of the plasma heating during which the hotter the plasma the smaller the magnetic field at the radio source. We have already noted difficulties with a model with magnetic dissipation at a given spatial location to account for this detected decrease of the magnetic field. Thus, we have to conclude that the process of plasma heating moves up from some low layer to higher coronal layers having correspondingly smaller magnetic field as observed. In our 'self-occulting' source model the outer layers are originally cool and, so, optically thin. As soon as the outer layers with smaller magnetic field are heated they become opaque for the gyro process; thus, the lower layers with the stronger magnetic field become invisible. This explains the observed evolution of the magnetic field. Apparently, the heating rate is stronger than the cooling rate at this rise phase.
The extended peak phase of roughly flat light radio curves deserves a close attention. Here, the thermal energy density, although small in the total energy budget, is not small any longer compared with the magnetic energy density at the peak flare phase. Indeed, a constant temperature level at about 40~MK implies a relatively high heating rate to compensate rapid conductive losses with $\tau_{cond}\sim30$~s. Given that the thermal energy density remains roughly constant at the level of $\sim160$~erg~cm$^{-3}$ over about two minutes, the source volume must have been supplied with $\sim500$~erg~cm$^{-3}$ over those two minutes. This value is comparable to the total magnetic energy density at the radio source during this extended peak phase. Nevertheless, the magnetic field keeps roughly constant during this phase, which unavoidably requires some energy input from an external energy source. Even more remarkable, the sum of the magnetic and thermal energies keeps precisely constant during the peak phase.
When this energy source is switched off or exhausted, the conductive plasma cooling starts to control the further evolution. The higher the temperature the faster the cooling; thus, the effective radiating layer moves back down and the magnetic field increases again almost to the initial level.
\subsection{Energy Distribution of the Flare Plasma}
One more fundamental question that can be conclusively addressed with this particular event, whose spectral evolution is consistent with a purely thermal process of the heating and cooling of the Maxwellian plasma, is what is the accuracy with which the Maxwellian distribution is maintained during the flare, or, equivalently, what deviations from the Maxwellian distribution are consistent with the data. To quantify these deviations we have considered, in Section~\ref{S_R_spectral_fit}, two spectral fits of the microwave spectrum sequence---one with the Maxwellian distribution of the plasma electrons, and the other one with the kappa distribution. A convenience of the kappa distribution for the purpose of characterization of presumably small deviations of the actual distribution from the Maxwellian one is that it depends on the $\kappa$ index in such a way that the kappa distribution is equivalent to the Maxwellian one for $\kappa\rightarrow\infty$, but develops a more and more pronounced power-law tail for progressively smaller $\kappa$ index. Other parameters of the kappa distribution are the same as for the Maxwellian one; it is important that the temperature $T$ of the kappa distribution has the same physical meaning (the second moment of the distribution characterizing the mean energy of the electrons) as the temperature $T$ of the Maxwellian distribution.
We note that the $\chi^2$ measures\footnote{The $\chi^2$ is noticeably smaller than one because estimates of the the statistical errors are overestimated as they are taken from the small antenna (less sensitive) but applied to big antenna (more sensitive) data. Here we are only interested in relative, rather than absolute, values of the $\chi^2$ measure.} for both fits are comparable to each other over the rise and peak phases of the burst. This implies that the data are comparably well fit by both these distributions. In the case of kappa-distribution fit, the $\kappa$ index is relatively large here, $\kappa\gtrsim 100$, {with typical uncertainties in $\kappa$ larger than 100\%. Such large values of $\kappa$ result} in visually indistinguishable microwave spectra produced by either Maxwellian or kappa distribution. One can conclude that the data are consistent with the kappa distribution with a large index; but a comparably meaningful conclusion is that there is no objective evidence in favor of any deviation from the Maxwellian distribution over the rise and peak phases. Importantly, the recovered physical parameters of the source, $B(t)$, $T(t)$, and $n_{th}(t)$, are all consistent for both fits over these phases.
The decay phase is apparently different from the rise and peak phases. Indeed, the $\chi^2$ is clearly smaller for the kappa distribution than for the Maxwellian one, which formally favors the kappa over the Maxwellian distribution. The $\kappa$ index decreases progressively at the decay phase from 8 to 2, {with the uncertainty about 10\%,} the magnetic field derived from the kappa fit is noticeably smaller than that derived from the Maxwellian fit; however, the temperatures still agree very well with each other.
Thus, the microwave spectra at the decay phase are apparently better consistent with the kappa than Maxwellian fit, which does not allow to firmly conclude that the Maxwellian distribution is maintained over the decay phase. One possible reason is that the actual energy distribution does deviate from the Maxwellian one at the decay phase due, perhaps, to nonthermal electron generation. It does not sound plausible, however, because this would imply that the particle acceleration did not take place at the stage of essential energy release, but appeared only at the decay phase, after the energy release is over. {Instead, we believe it more likely} that the plasma electron distribution remains (more or less) Maxwellian even at the decay phase; however, a nonuniform cooling results in a multi-temperature instead of the single-temperature plasma volume, so the deviation from the Maxwellian fit at the decay phase is indicative of increasing source nonuniformity, rather than a nonthermal electron generation. This further implies that a uniform source with the kappa distribution can be used as a working model for nonuniform multi-temperature Maxwellian sources in other, more complex thermal solar flares.
\section{Conclusions}
We have described a nice solar flare whose spectral evolution in the microwave domain is consistent with a purely thermal behavior; only very minor deviations (if any) from the Maxwellian distribution are consistent with the data. From this perspective this event is similar to a thermal flare reported earlier by \citet{Gary_Hurford_1989}, whose spatial structures are, however, strikingly different from each other (a single source in the former case, while a complex source in our case). We believe that this difference comes from the different flare locations in these two cases. \citet{Gary_Hurford_1989} reported a flare seen on disk, where the source of the gyro emission is observed at a quasi-parallel direction to the magnetic field, where no gyro-stripe structure is present. On the contrary, our event happened at the limb, so we likely observe a loop quasi-transversely to the magnetic field, when the spectral harmonic structure and the spatial gyro-stipes are the most pronounced.
We detected a clear evolution of the source parameters such as $B(t)$, $T(t)$, and $n_{th}(t)$ suggesting a corresponding evolution of the magnetic and thermal energies at the radio source. However, the measured energy components do not easily obey the energy conservation requirement, implying that the observed source does not represent an isolated volume, but rather efficiently exchanges its energy with a bigger surrounding volume. In particular, we concluded that the apparent decrease of the magnetic field at the radio source over the rise phase of the flare cannot be easily associated with the magnetic energy transformation to the thermal or kinetic energy within a single isolated volume, but instead requires an upward propagating magnetic reconnection/plasma heating process, such as in the standard flare scenario with one remarkable difference, however: the absence of the nonthermal electron generation. We hope that the study of other thermal flares will better clarify the origin of such purely thermal events, which show a significant energy release observed through the plasma heating, but do not result in any measurable acceleration of the charged particles.
\acknowledgments
This work was supported in part by NSF grants AGS-1250374 and AGS-1262772 and NASA grants NNX10AF27G and NNX14AC87G to New Jersey Institute of Technology.
This work also benefited from workshop support from the International Space Science Institute (ISSI).
\newpage
\bibliographystyle{apj}
|
\section{Introduction}
Discrete transforms defined over finite fields,
such as
the finite field Fourier transform (FFFT),
pivotal tools in coding theory~\cite{BLAH} and signal processing~\cite{Reed}.
Another interesting example is the
finite field Hartley transform
(FFHT),
a self-inverse transform (involution operator)
introduced in~\cite{TRIGO,FFHT,CFFHT}.
Recent promising applications of discrete
transforms concern the use of the FFHT to design digital multiplex systems,
efficient multiple access systems~\cite{MA} and multilevel spread spectrum
sequences~\cite{Spread}.
A decisive factor for applications of discrete
transforms has been the existence of the so-called fast transforms (FT) for
computing it.
Since the FFHT is a more symmetrical version of discrete
transform, in this paper this symmetry is exploited so as to derive new FTs that require
less operations.
These FTs, derived for short blocklengths ($N\leq 24)$, are
based on successive decompositions in a similar way as the multilayer
Hadamard decomposition employed~\cite{Renato}
to compute
the discrete Hartley Transform (DHT)~\cite{BRAC}.
This new approach,
which is based on
decomposition of the FFHT by means of Hadamard-Walsh transforms (HWT),
meets the lower bound on the multiplicative complexity of
a discrete Fourier transform (DFT)~\cite{Complexid}.
Each
HWT implements pre-additions and post-additions.
These schemes are easy to
implement using digital signal processors (DSP) or low-cost high-speed
dedicated hardware.
The complexity of these new FTs is compared
with that of traditional methods,
such as the
Cooley-Tukey radix-2,
split radix,
Winograd,
and
Rader-Brenner algorithms,
which were adapted to compute
the FFHT~\cite{Chile}.
\section{The Finite Field Hartley Transform}
Finite field Hartley transforms are
based on a trigonometry over Galois Fields $GF(q)$, $q=p^r$, $p\equiv3\pmod4$,
so that $(p-1)^{1/2}\not \in GF(q)$. The set $G(q)$ of
Gaussian integers over $GF(q)$\ plays an important role in this analysis.
This set defines a structure $GI(q)$,
which is isomorphic to
$GF(q^2)$~\cite{TRIGO}.
\begin{definition}
Let $\zeta $ be an element of $GI(q)$ with multiplicative order $N$, where
$q=p^r$. The trigonometric functions sine, cosine, and
$\operatorname{cas}$ (cosine-and-sine or Hartley kernel)
are defined by,
respectively:
\begin{align*}
\sin (i) &= \frac{\zeta ^i-\zeta ^{-i}}{2j},
\\
\cos (i)&=\frac{\zeta ^i+\zeta ^{-i}}2,
\\
\operatorname{cas}(i)&=\sin (i)+\cos (i)
,
\end{align*}
for $i = 0,1,\ldots,N-1$.
\end{definition}
\begin{definition}
Let $v=\{v_0,v_1,\ldots,v_{N-1}\}$ be a vector of $GF(q)$-valued components,
$q=p^r$.
The finite field Hartley transform (FFHT) is the vector
$V=\{V_0,V_1,\ldots,V_{N-1}\}$,
with components $V_k\in GI(q^m)$ given by
$V_k=\sum_{i=0}^{N-1}v_i\cdot\operatorname{cas}(ik)$,
where $\zeta $ is an element of multiplicative order $N$ over $GI(q^m)$.
\end{definition}
The inverse FFHT is given by the following theorem.
\begin{theorem}
The vector $v=\{v_0,v_1,\ldots,v_{N-1}\}$ can be derived from its FFHT according
to:
\begin{align*}
v_i
=
\frac{1}{N\pmod{p}}
\sum_{k=0}^{N-1}
V_k\cdot \operatorname{cas}(ik)
,
\end{align*}
for $i = 0,1,\ldots,N-1$.
\end{theorem}
\section{Hadamard Decomposition of the FFHT}
The Hadamard decomposition was employed
in~\cite{Renato} as a tool to compute the discrete Hartley transform.
This approach
allows the minimization of the multiplicative complexity of the DHT for some
blocklengths.
Since all the properties and symmetries of the DHT are also
observed for the FFHT, the application of this algorithm to finite fields
should be expected.
The minimal multiplicative complexity
of a DFT
with blocklength $N$---denoted by $\mu (DFT(N))$---can be calculated by converting the DFT in a set of
cyclic convolutions. A lower bound on $\mu (DFT(N))$ is presented in~\cite{Complexid}.
Table~\ref{mi} shows a few values of $\mu (DFT(N))$ for short
blocklengths.
\begin{table}
\begin{center}
\caption{Minimal Multiplicative Complexity achievable for the $N$-point DFT}
\begin{tabular}{ccccc}
\toprule
$N$ & 4 & 8 &12 & 16 \\
\midrule
$\mu(DFT(N))$ & 0 & 2 & 4 & 10 \\
\bottomrule
\end{tabular}
\label{mi}
\end{center}
\end{table}
Considering with finite field transforms,
the following comments are worthwhile:
\begin{enumerate}[(i)]
\item The minimal multiplicative complexity, $\mu (FFFT(N))$, for a FT over
the finite field $GI(p^r)$, is the same as $\mu (DFT(N)),$ evaluated over
the real field.
\item The relationship between the multiplicative and additive complexity
over a finite field strong depends on implementation. For small $p,$ the
total complexity (additive plus multiplicative) must be taken into account
since their difference is small.
\end{enumerate}
New algorithms for computing the FFHT are introduced in the next section.
\subsection{Computing the 4-point FFHT}
Let $v\longleftrightarrow V$ be a FFHT transform pair over $GI(7)$. The
FFHT, assuming a $\operatorname{cas}(\cdot)$ kernel with $\zeta =j$, is computed by:
$$
\left[
\begin{smallmatrix}
V_0 \\
V_1 \\
V_2 \\
V_3
\end{smallmatrix}
\right] =\left[
\begin{smallmatrix}
1 & 1 & 1 & 1 \\
1 & 1 & 6 & 6 \\
1 & 6 & 1 & 6 \\
1 & 6 & 6 & 1
\end{smallmatrix}
\right] \left[
\begin{smallmatrix}
v_0 \\
v_1 \\
v_2 \\
v_3
\end{smallmatrix}
\right] .
$$
Indeed, no multiplication is needed. Observing further symmetries, columns
can be combined through Hadamard blocks in order to reduce the number of
additions. Let
\begin{align*}
S_0(1)&=(v_3-v_1),\,S_1(1)=(v_3+v_1),\\
S_2(1)&=(v_0-v_2),\,S_3(1)=(v_0+v_2).
\end{align*}
It follows that:
$$
\left[
\begin{smallmatrix}
V_0 \\
V_1 \\
V_2 \\
V_3
\end{smallmatrix}
\right] =\left[
\begin{smallmatrix}
0 & 1 & 0 & 1 \\
6 & 0 & 1 & 0 \\
0 & 6 & 0 & 1 \\
1 & 0 & 1 & 0
\end{smallmatrix}
\right] \left[
\begin{smallmatrix}
S_0(1) \\
S_1(1) \\
S_2(1) \\
S_3(1)
\end{smallmatrix}
\right] .
$$
The number of additions is reduced from 12 to 8 (4 pre-additions and 4
post-additions).
\subsection{Computing the $6$-point FFHT}
Let $v\longleftrightarrow V$ be an FFHT transform pair over $GI(7)$.
Considering $\zeta =3$, the FFHT can be computed by
$$
\left[
\begin{smallmatrix}
V_0 \\
V_1 \\
V_2 \\
V_3 \\
V_4 \\
V_5
\end{smallmatrix}
\right] =\left[
\begin{smallmatrix}
1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 \\
1 & 4+j & 3+j & 6 & 3+6j & 4+6j \\
1 & 3+j & 3+6j & 1 & 3+j & 3+6j \\
1 & 6 & 1 & 6 & 1 & 6 \\
1 & 3+6j & 3+j & 1 & 3+6j & 3+j \\
1 & 4+6j & 3+6j & 6 & 3+j & 4+j
\end{smallmatrix}
\right] \left[
\begin{smallmatrix}
v_0 \\
v_1 \\
v_2 \\
v_3 \\
v_4 \\
v_5
\end{smallmatrix}
\right] .
$$
Observing the symmetries, a first column combination can be made. Let
$$
\begin{smallmatrix}
S_0(1)=(v_4-v_1),\,S_1(1)=(v_4+v_1),\,S_2(1)=(v_5-v_2), \\
S_3(1)=(v_5+v_2),\,S_4(1)=(v_0-v_3),\,S_5(1)=(v_0+v_3).
\end{smallmatrix}
$$
Therefore,
$$
\left[
\begin{smallmatrix}
V_0 \\
V_1 \\
V_2 \\
V_3 \\
V_4 \\
V_5
\end{smallmatrix}
\right] =\left[
\begin{smallmatrix}
0 & 1 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 1 \\
3+6j & 0 & 4+6j & 0 & 1 & 0 \\
0 & 3+j & 0 & 3+6j & 0 & 1 \\
1 & 0 & 6 & 0 & 1 & 0 \\
0 & 3+6j & 0 & 3+j & 0 & 1 \\
3+j & 0 & 4+j & 0 & 1 & 0
\end{smallmatrix}
\right] \left[
\begin{smallmatrix}
S_0(1) \\
S_1(1) \\
S_2(1) \\
S_3(1) \\
S_4(1) \\
S_5(1)
\end{smallmatrix}
\right] .
$$
Going on with this procedure, a second pre-addition layer is derived:
\begin{align*}
S_0(2)&=S_2(1)-S_0(1), S_1(2)=S_2(1)+S_0(1), \\
S_2(2)&=S_3(1)-S_1(1), S_3(2)=S_3(1)+S_1(1), \\
S_4(2)&=S_4(1), S_5(2)=S_5(1)
.
\end{align*}
Finally,
$$
\left[
\begin{smallmatrix}
V_0 \\
V_1 \\
V_2 \\
V_3 \\
V_4 \\
V_5
\end{smallmatrix}
\right] =\left[
\begin{smallmatrix}
0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 1 \\
4 & 6j & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \\
0 & 0 & 6j & 3 & 0 & 1 \\
6 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \\
0 & 0 & j & 3 & 0 & 1 \\
4 & 1j & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0
\end{smallmatrix}
\right] \left[
\begin{smallmatrix}
S_0(2) \\
S_1(2) \\
S_2(2) \\
S_3(2) \\
S_4(2) \\
S_5(2)
\end{smallmatrix}
\right] .
$$
Since there is only one multiplication (by the same factor) in columns 1 and
4, there will be two multiplications. The total number of additions required
to compute a 6-blocklength FFHT is 16 (10 pre-additions and 6
post-additions).
\subsection{Computing the 8-point FFHT}
Let $v\longleftrightarrow V$ be an FFHT transform pair over $GI(7)$.
Let
$\zeta =2+2j$, so the corresponding matrix formulation is,
$$
\left[
\begin{smallmatrix}
V_0 \\
V_1 \\
V_2 \\
V_3 \\
V_4 \\
V_5 \\
V_6 \\
V_7
\end{smallmatrix}
\right] =\left[
\begin{smallmatrix}
1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 \\
1 & 4 & 1 & 0 & 6 & 3 & 6 & 0 \\
1 & 1 & 6 & 6 & 1 & 1 & 6 & 6 \\
1 & 0 & 6 & 4 & 6 & 0 & 1 & 3 \\
1 & 6 & 1 & 6 & 1 & 6 & 1 & 6 \\
1 & 3 & 1 & 0 & 6 & 4 & 6 & 0 \\
1 & 6 & 6 & 1 & 1 & 6 & 6 & 1 \\
1 & 0 & 6 & 3 & 6 & 0 & 1 & 4
\end{smallmatrix}
\right] \left[
\begin{smallmatrix}
v_0 \\
v_1 \\
v_2 \\
v_3 \\
v_4 \\
v_5 \\
v_6 \\
v_7
\end{smallmatrix}
\right] .
$$
Defining a 1st order pre-addition layer:
\begin{align*}
S_0(1)&=(v_5-v_1),\,S_1(1)=(v_5+v_1), \\
S_2(1)&=(v_6-v_2),\,S_3(1)=(v_6+v_2), \\
S_4(1)&=(v_7-v_3),\,S_5(1)=(v_7+v_3), \\
S_6(1)&=(v_0-v_4),\,S_7(1)=(v_0+v_4).
\end{align*}
Therefore,
$$
\left[
\begin{smallmatrix}
V_0 \\
V_1 \\
V_2 \\
V_3 \\
V_4 \\
V_5 \\
V_6 \\
V_7
\end{smallmatrix}
\right] =\left[
\begin{smallmatrix}
0 & 1 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 1 \\
3 & 0 & 6 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \\
0 & 1 & 0 & 6 & 0 & 6 & 0 & 1 \\
0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 3 & 0 & 1 & 0 \\
0 & 6 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 6 & 0 & 1 \\
4 & 0 & 6 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \\
0 & 6 & 0 & 6 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 1 \\
0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 4 & 0 & 1 & 0
\end{smallmatrix}
\right] \left[
\begin{smallmatrix}
S_0(1) \\
S_1(1) \\
S_2(1) \\
S_3(1) \\
S_4(1) \\
S_5(1) \\
S_6(1) \\
S_7(1)
\end{smallmatrix}
\right] .
$$
Defining a 2nd pre-addition layer,
\begin{align*}
S_0(2)&=S_0(1),\,S_1(2)=S_4(1),\\
S_2(2)&=S_5(1)-S_1(1),\,S_3(2)=S_5(1)+S_1(1),\\
S_4(2)&=S_6(1)-S_2(1),\,S_5(2)=S_6(1)+S_2(1),\\
S_6(2)&=S_7(1)-S_3(1),\,S_7(2)=S_7(1)+S_3(1).
\end{align*}
Consequently, we obtain:
$$
\left[
\begin{smallmatrix}
V_0 \\
V_1 \\
V_2 \\
V_3 \\
V_4 \\
V_5 \\
V_6 \\
V_7
\end{smallmatrix}
\right] =\left[
\begin{smallmatrix}
0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \\
3 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\
0 & 0 & 6 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \\
0 & 3 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\
0 & 0 & 0 & 6 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \\
4 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\
0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \\
0 & 4 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0
\end{smallmatrix}
\right] \left[
\begin{smallmatrix}
S_0(2) \\
S_1(2) \\
S_2(2) \\
S_3(2) \\
S_4(2) \\
S_5(2) \\
S_6(2) \\
S_7(2)
\end{smallmatrix}
\right] .
$$
Since there is only one multiplication (by the same factor) in columns 1 and
2, there are two multiplications. The number of additions is 22 (14
pre-additions and 8 post-additions). It is worthwhile to remark that the
additive complexity is less than the one for an 8-DFT calculation by
the Winograd algorithm.
\subsection{Computing the 12-point FFHT}
Let $v\longleftrightarrow V$ be an FFHT transform pair over $GI(p)$. As an
example, let $p=7$ and $\zeta =3j.$ Then $V=Tv$ where,
$$
T=
\left[
\begin{smallmatrix}
1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 \\
1 & 4+6j & 4+6j & 1 & 3+6j & 4+j & 6 & 3+j & 3+j & 6 & 4+j & 3+6j \\
1 & 4+6j & 3+6j & 6 & 3+j & 4+j & 1 & 4+6j & 3+6j & 6 & 3+j & 4+j \\
1 & 1 & 6 & 6 & 1 & 1 & 6 & 6 & 1 & 1 & 6 & 6 \\
1 & 3+6j & 3+j & 1 & 3+6j & 3+j & 1 & 3+6j & 3+j & 1 & 3+6j & 3+j \\
1 & 4+j & 4+j & 1 & 3+j & 4+6j & 6 & 3+6j & 3+6j & 6 & 4+6j & 3+j \\
1 & 6 & 1 & 6 & 1 & 6 & 1 & 6 & 1 & 6 & 1 & 6 \\
1 & 3+j & 4+6j & 6 & 3+6j & 3+6j & 6 & 4+6j & 3+j & 1 & 4+j & 4+j \\
1 & 3+j & 3+6j & 1 & 3+j & 3+6j & 1 & 3+j & 3+6j & 1 & 3+j & 3+6j \\
1 & 6 & 6 & 1 & 1 & 6 & 6 & 1 & 1 & 6 & 6 & 1 \\
1 & 4+j & 3+j & 6 & 3+6j & 4+6j & 1 & 4+j & 3+j & 6 & 3+6j & 4+6j \\
1 & 3+6j & 4+j & 6 & 3+j & 3+j & 6 & 4+j & 3+6j & 1 & 4+6j & 4+6j
\end{smallmatrix}
\right] .
$$
Defining a 1st order pre-addition layer,
we obtain:
\begin{align*}
S_0(1)&=(v_7-v_1),\,S_1(1)=(v_7+v_1),\\
S_2(1)&=(v_8-v_2),\,S_3(1)=(v_8+v_2),\\
S_4(1)&=(v_9-v_3),\,S_5(1)=(v_9+v_3),\\
S_6(1)&=(v_{10}-v_4),\,S_7(1)=(v_{10}+v_4),\\
S_8(1)&=(v_{11}-v_5),\,S_9(1)=(v_{11}+v_5),\\
S_{10}(1)&=(v_0-v_6),\,S_{11}(1)=(v_0+v_6).
\end{align*}
Therefore, $V=T^{(1)}S(1)$, where
$$
T^{(1)}=\left[ {\
\begin{smallmatrix}
0 & 1 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 1 \\
3+j & 0 & 3+j & 0 & 6 & 0 & 4+j & 0 & 3+6j & 0 & 1 & 0 \\
0 & 4+6j & 0 & 3+6j & 0 & 6 & 0 & 3+j & 0 & 4+j & 0 & 1 \\
6 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 6 & 0 & 6 & 0 & 1 & 0 \\
0 & 3+6j & 0 & 3+j & 0 & 1 & 0 & 3+6j & 0 & 3+j & 0 & 1 \\
3+6j & 0 & 3+6j & 0 & 6 & 0 & 4+6j & 0 & 3+j & 0 & 1 & 0 \\
0 & 6 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 6 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 6 & 0 & 1 \\
4+6j & 0 & 3+j & 0 & 1 & 0 & 4+j & 0 & 4+j & 0 & 1 & 0 \\
0 & 3+j & 0 & 3+6j & 0 & 1 & 0 & 3+j & 0 & 3+6j & 0 & 1 \\
1 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 6 & 0 & 6 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 1 & 0 \\
0 & 4+j & 0 & 3+j & 0 & 6 & 0 & 3+6j & 0 & 4+6j & 0 & 1 \\
4+j & 0 & 3+6j & 0 & 1 & 0 & 4+6j & 0 & 4+6j & 0 & 1 & 0
\end{smallmatrix}
}\right] .
$$
A second order pre-addition layer can be defined according to,
\begin{align*}
S_0(2)&=S_6(1)-S_0(1),\,S_6(2)=S_9(1)-S_3(1),\\
S_1(2)&=S_6(1)+S_0(1),\,S_7(2)=S_9(1)+S_3(1),\\
S_2(2)&=S_7(1)-S_1(1),\,S_8(2)=S_{10}(1)-S_4(1),\\
S_3(2)&=S_7(1)+S_1(1),\,S_9(2)=S_{10}(1)+S_4(1),\\
S_4(2)&=S_8(1)-S_2(1),\,S_{10}(2)=S_{11}(1)-S_5(1),\\
S_5(2)&=S_8(1)+S_2(1),\,S_{11}(2)=S_{11}(1)+S_5(1).
\end{align*}
Therefore, $V=T^{(2)}S(2)$, where
$$
T^{(2)}=\left[ {\
\begin{smallmatrix}
0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \\
4 & j & 0 & 0 & 6j & 3 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\
0 & 0 & 3+j & 0 & 0 & 0 & 4+j & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \\
0 & 6 & 0 & 0 & 6 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\
0 & 0 & 0 & 3+6j & 0 & 0 & 0 & 3+j & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \\
4 & 6j & 0 & 0 & j & 3 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\
0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 6 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \\
j & 4 & 0 & 0 & 4 & j & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\
0 & 0 & 0 & 3+j & 0 & 0 & 0 & 3+6j & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \\
6 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\
0 & 0 & 3+6j & 0 & 0 & 0 & 4+6j & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \\
j & 4 & 0 & 0 & 4 & 6j & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0
\end{smallmatrix}
}\right] .
$$
Going further, a 3rd order pre-addition layer is defined:
\begin{align*}
S_0(3)=&S_4(2)-S_1(2),\,S_6(3)=S_7(2)-S_3(2),\\
S_1(3)=&S_4(2)+S_1(2),\,S_7(3)=S_7(2)+S_3(2), \\
S_2(3)=&S_5(2)-S_0(2),\,S_8(3)=S_8(2),\\
S_3(3)=&S_5(2)+S_0(2),\,S_9(3)=S_9(2),\\
S_4(3)=&S_6(2)-S_2(2),\,S_{10}(3)=S_{10}(2),\\
S_5(3)=&S_6(2)+S_2(2),\,S_{11}(3)=S_{11}(2).
\end{align*}
Thus $V=T^{(3)}S(3)$, where
$$
T^{(3)}=\left[
\begin{smallmatrix}
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \\
6j & 0 & 3 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 4 & j & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \\
0 & 6 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & j & 3 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \\
j & 0 & 3 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 6 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \\
0 & 4 & 0 & j & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 6j & 3 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \\
0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 4 & 6j & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \\
0 & 4 & 6j & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0
\end{smallmatrix}
\right] .
$$
Since there is just one multiplication by the same factor in columns 2, 3, 5
and 8, the total number of multiplications is 4. The number of additions
required to compute the FFHT is 44 (32 pre-additions and 12 post-additions).
The multiplicative complexity reaches the minimum theoretical complexity and
again the additive complexity is the same as the one obtained for the DHT
\cite{Renato}.
\subsection{Computing the 16-point FFHT}
Let $v\longleftrightarrow V$ a FFHT\ pair over $GI(p)$.
Assuming $p=7$ and $\zeta =2+4j$, the corresponding transform is $V=Tv$, where
$$
T=\left[
\begin{smallmatrix}
1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 \\
1 & 2j & 4 & 2j & 1 & 6j & 0 & j & 6 & 5j & 3 & 2j & 6 & j & 0 & 6j \\
1 & 4 & 1 & 0 & 6 & 3 & 6 & 0 & 1 & 4 & 1 & 0 & 6 & 3 & 6 & 0 \\
1 & 2j & 0 & 5j & 6 & 6j & 4 & 6j & 6 & 5j & 0 & 2j & 1 & j & 3 & j \\
1 & 1 & 6 & 6 & 1 & 1 & 6 & 6 & 1 & 1 & 6 & 6 & 1 & 1 & 6 & 6 \\
1 & 6j & 3 & 6j & 1 & 5j & 0 & 2j & 6 & j & 4 & j & 6 & 2j & 0 & 5j \\
1 & 0 & 6 & 4 & 6 & 0 & 1 & 3 & 1 & 0 & 6 & 4 & 6 & 0 & 1 & 3 \\
1 & 6j & 0 & 6j & 6 & 2j & 3 & 2j & 6 & 6j & 0 & j & 1 & 5j & 4 & 5j \\
1 & 6 & 1 & 6 & 1 & 6 & 1 & 6 & 1 & 6 & 1 & 6 & 1 & 6 & 1 & 6 \\
1 & 5j & 4 & 5j & 1 & j & 0 & 6j & 6 & 2j & 3 & 2j & 6 & 6j & 0 & j \\
1 & 3 & 1 & 0 & 6 & 4 & 6 & 0 & 1 & 3 & 1 & 0 & 6 & 4 & 6 & 0 \\
1 & 5j & 0 & 2j & 6 & j & 4 & j & 6 & 2j & 0 & 5j & 1 & 6j & 3 & 6j \\
1 & 6 & 6 & 1 & 1 & 6 & 6 & 1 & 1 & 6 & 6 & 1 & 1 & 6 & 6 & 1 \\
1 & j & 3 & j & 1 & 2j & 0 & 5j & 6 & 6j & 4 & 6j & 6 & 5j & 0 & 2j \\
1 & 0 & 6 & 3 & 6 & 0 & 1 & 4 & 1 & 0 & 6 & 3 & 6 & 0 & 1 & 4 \\
1 & 6j & 0 & j & 6 & 5j & 3 & 5j & 6 & j & 0 & 6j & 1 & 2j & 4 & 2j
\end{smallmatrix}
\right] .
$$
Now we consider the first order pre-addition layer according to:
\begin{equation}
\label{ord1}
\begin{split}
S_0(1)&=(v_9-v_1),\,S_1(1)=(v_9+v_1),\\
S_2(1)&=(v_{10}+v_2),\,S_3(1)=(v_{10}+v_2),\\
S_4(1)&=(v_{11}-v_3),\,S_5(1)=(v_{11}+v_3),\\
S_6(1)&=(v_{12}-v_4),\,S_7(1)=(v_{12}+v_4),\\
S_8(1)&=(v_{13}-v_5),\,S_9(1)=(v_{13}+v_5),\\
S_{10}(1)&=(v_{14}-v_6),\,S_{11}(1)=(v_{14}+v_6),\\
S_{12}(1)&=(v_{15}-v_7),\,S_{13}(1)=(v_{15}+v_7),\\
S_{14}(1)&=(v_0-v_8),\,S_{15}(1)=(v_0+v_8).
\end{split}
\end{equation}
Therefore, $V=T^{(1)}S(1)$, where
$$
T^{(1)}=\left[
\begin{smallmatrix}
0 & 1 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 1 \\
5j & 0 & 3 & 0 & 5j & 0 & 6 & 0 & j & 0 & 0 & 0 & 6j & 0 & 1 & 0 \\
0 & 4 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 6 & 0 & 3 & 0 & 6 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \\
5j & 0 & 0 & 0 & 2j & 0 & 1 & 0 & j & 0 & 3 & 0 & j & 0 & 1 & 0 \\
0 & 1 & 0 & 6 & 0 & 6 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 6 & 0 & 6 & 0 & 1 \\
j & 0 & 4 & 0 & j & 0 & 6 & 0 & 2j & 0 & 0 & 0 & 5j & 0 & 1 & 0 \\
0 & 0 & 0 & 6 & 0 & 4 & 0 & 6 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 3 & 0 & 1 \\
6j & 0 & 0 & 0 & j & 0 & 1 & 0 & 5j & 0 & 4 & 0 & 5j & 0 & 1 & 0 \\
0 & 6 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 6 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 6 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 6 & 0 & 1 \\
2j & 0 & 3 & 0 & 2j & 0 & 6 & 0 & 6j & 0 & 0 & 0 & j & 0 & 1 & 0 \\
0 & 3 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 6 & 0 & 4 & 0 & 6 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \\
2j & 0 & 0 & 0 & 5j & 0 & 1 & 0 & 6j & 0 & 3 & 0 & 6j & 0 & 1 & 0 \\
0 & 6 & 0 & 6 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 6 & 0 & 6 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 1 \\
6j & 0 & 4 & 0 & 6j & 0 & 6 & 0 & 5j & 0 & 0 & 0 & 2j & 0 & 1 & 0 \\
0 & 0 & 0 & 6 & 0 & 3 & 0 & 6 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 4 & 0 & 1 \\
j & 0 & 0 & 0 & 6j & 0 & 1 & 0 & 2j & 0 & 4 & 0 & 2j & 0 & 1 & 0
\end{smallmatrix}
\right] .
$$
By defining a 2nd order pre-addition layer,
we have:
\begin{equation}
\label{ord2}
\begin{split}
S_0(2)&=S_4(1)-S_0(1),\,S_1(2)=S_4(1)+S_0(1),\\
S_2(2)&=S_9(1)-S_1(1),\,S_3(2)=S_9(1)+S_1(1),\\
S_4(2)&=S_2(1),\,S_5(2)=S_{10}(1),\\
S_6(2)&=S_{11}(1)-S_3(1),\,S_7(2)=S_{11}(1)+S_3(1),\\
S_8(2)&=S_{12}(1)-S_8(1),\,S_9(2)=S_{12}(1)+S_8(1),\\
S_{10}(2)&=S_{13}(1)-S_5(1),\,S_{11}(2)=S_{13}(1)+S_5(1),\\
S_{12}(2)&=S_{14}(1)-S_6(1),\,S_{13}(2)=S_{14}(1)+S_6(1),\\
S_{14}(2)&=S_{15}(1)-S_7(1),\,S_{15}(2)=S_{15}(1)+S_7(1).
\end{split}
\end{equation}
Then, $V=T^{(2)}S(2)$, where
$$
T^{(2)}=\left[
\begin{smallmatrix}
0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \\
0 & 5j & 0 & 0 & 3 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 6j & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\
0 & 0 & 3 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 6 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \\
2j & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 3 & 0 & 0 & 0 & j & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\
0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 6 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 6 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \\
0 & j & 0 & 0 & 4 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 5j & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 3 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \\
j & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 4 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 5j & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\
0 & 0 & 0 & 6 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 6 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \\
0 & 2j & 0 & 0 & 3 & 0 & 0 & 0 & j & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\
0 & 0 & 4 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 6 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \\
5j & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 3 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 6j & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\
0 & 0 & 0 & 6 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 6 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \\
0 & 6j & 0 & 0 & 4 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 2j & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 4 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \\
6j & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 4 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 2j & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0
\end{smallmatrix}
\right] .
$$
The columns do not cope. However, multiplying both the 5 and 6 columns by
$2\,\in GF(7)$, they can be combined with columns 13 and 14, respectively.
Defining then a 2nd order pre-addition layer (with two multiplications in
columns 10 and 11),
we have:
\begin{align*}
S_0(3)&=S_0(2),\,S_1(3)=S_1(2),\\
S_2(3)&=S_8(2),\,S_3(3)=S_9(2),\\
S_4(3)&=S_2(2),\,S_5(3)=S_{10}(2),\\
S_6(3)&=S_{11}(2)-S_3(2),\,S_7(3)=S_{11}(2)+S_3(2),\\
S_8(3)&=S_{12}(2)-4S_4(2),\,S_9(3)=S_{12}(2)+2S_4(2),\\
S_{10}(3)&=S_{13}(2)-4S_5(2),S_{11}(3)=S_{13}(2)+2S_5(2),\\
S_{12}(3)&=S_{14}(2)-S_6(2),\,S_{13}(3)=S_{14}(2)+S_6(2),\\
S_{14}(3)&=S_{15}(2)-S_7(2),\,S_{15}(3)=S_{15}(2)+S_7(2).
\end{align*}
Finally, $V=T^{(3)}S(3)$, where
$$
T^{(3)}=\left[
\begin{smallmatrix}
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \\
0 & 5j & 6j & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 3 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\
2j & 0 & 0 & j & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 6 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \\
0 & j & 5j & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 3 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\
j & 0 & 0 & 5j & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 6 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \\
0 & 2j & j & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 4 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\
5j & 0 & 0 & 6j & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \\
0 & 6j & 2j & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 4 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\
6j & 0 & 0 & 2j & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0
\end{smallmatrix}
\right] .
$$
There is only one multiplication in columns 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6, besides
two pre-multiplications, so the total complexity is 8. The number of
additions is 50 (40 pre-additions and 16 post-additions).
In this case, the
number of multiplications is less than 10, the minimum expected
multiplication complexity~\cite{Complexid}. It can be concluded that there
are two trivial multiplications. It is not simple to identify which are the
trivial multiplications from the observation of matrices over $GI(7)$.
Carrying on the same analysis over another finite field, the same
combination of columns was observed, i.e. the approach does not depend on
the finite field but on the length. Let $v\longleftrightarrow V$ be an FFHT\
pair over $GI(p)$. Considering now $p=31,\zeta =7+13j$, the transform matrix
$T$ will be,
$$
T=\left[
\begin{smallmatrix}
1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 \\
1 & 20 & 0 & 11 & 30 & 6 & 23 & 6 & 30 & 11 & 0 & 20 & 1 & 25 & 8 & 25 \\
1 & 0 & 30 & 23 & 30 & 0 & 1 & 8 & 1 & 0 & 30 & 23 & 30 & 0 & 1 & 8 \\
1 & 11 & 23 & 11 & 1 & 25 & 0 & 6 & 30 & 20 & 8 & 20 & 30 & 6 & 0 & 25 \\
1 & 30 & 30 & 1 & 1 & 30 & 30 & 1 & 1 & 30 & 30 & 1 & 1 & 30 & 30 & 1 \\
1 & 6 & 0 & 25 & 30 & 11 & 8 & 11 & 30 & 25 & 0 & 6 & 1 & 20 & 23 & 20 \\
1 & 23 & 1 & 0 & 30 & 8 & 30 & 0 & 1 & 23 & 1 & 0 & 30 & 8 & 30 & 0 \\
1 & 6 & 8 & 6 & 1 & 11 & 0 & 20 & 30 & 25 & 23 & 25 & 30 & 20 & 0 & 11 \\
1 & 30 & 1 & 30 & 1 & 30 & 1 & 30 & 1 & 30 & 1 & 30 & 1 & 30 & 1 & 30 \\
1 & 11 & 0 & 20 & 30 & 25 & 23 & 25 & 30 & 20 & 0 & 11 & 1 & 6 & 8 & 6 \\
1 & 0 & 20 & 8 & 30 & 0 & 1 & 23 & 1 & 0 & 30 & 8 & 30 & 0 & 1 & 23 \\
1 & 20 & 23 & 20 & 1 & 6 & 0 & 25 & 30 & 11 & 8 & 11 & 30 & 25 & 0 & 6 \\
1 & 1 & 30 & 30 & 1 & 1 & 30 & 30 & 1 & 1 & 30 & 30 & 1 & 1 & 30 & 30 \\
1 & 25 & 0 & 6 & 30 & 20 & 8 & 20 & 30 & 6 & 0 & 25 & 1 & 11 & 23 & 11 \\
1 & 8 & 1 & 0 & 30 & 23 & 30 & 0 & 1 & 8 & 1 & 0 & 30 & 23 & 30 & 0 \\
1 & 25 & 8 & 25 & 1 & 20 & 0 & 11 & 30 & 6 & 23 & 6 & 30 & 11 & 0 & 20
\end{smallmatrix}
\right] .
$$
Considering the first order pre-addition layer (Equation~\ref{ord1}) and the
second order pre-addition layer (Equation~\ref{ord2}), $V=T^{(2)}S(2)$, where
$$
T^{(2)}=\left[
\begin{smallmatrix}
0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \\
20 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 8 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 25 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 8 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \\
0 & 20 & 0 & 0 & 8 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 25 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\
0 & 0 & 0 & 30 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 30 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \\
6 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 23 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 20 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\
0 & 0 & 8 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 30 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \\
0 & 25 & 0 & 0 & 23 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 11 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\
0 & 0 & 0 & 30 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 30 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \\
11 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 8 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 6 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 23 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \\
0 & 11 & 0 & 0 & 8 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 6 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\
0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 30 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 30 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \\
25 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 23 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 11 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\
0 & 0 & 23 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 30 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \\
0 & 6 & 0 & 0 & 23 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 20 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0
\end{smallmatrix}
\right] .
$$
Again, some columns do not cope. But, multiplying both columns 5 and 6 by
$4\,\in GF(31)$, they can be combined with columns 14 and 13, respectively. The
same occurs with columns 9 and 10, which
combine with columns 2 and 1,
respectively.
A third layer of pre-additions, including four
pre-multiplications in columns 1, 2, 5, and 6,
is given by:
\begin{align*}
S_0(3)&=S_7(2)-S_3(2),\,S_1(3)=S_7(2)+S_7(2),\\
S_2(3)&=S_8(2)-7S_1(2),\, S_3(3)=S_7(2)+8S_1(2),\\
S_4(3)&=S_9(2)-7S_0(2),\,S_5(3)=S_9(2)+7S_0(2),\\
S_6(3)&=S_2(2),\,S_7(3)=S_{10}(2),\\
S_8(3)&=S_{12}(2)-4S_4(2),\,S_9(3)=S_{12}(2)+4S_4(2),\\
S_{10}(3)&=S_{13}(2)-4S_5(2),\,S_{11}(3)=S_{13}(2)+4S_5(2),\\
S_{12}(3)&=S_{14}(2)-S_6(2),\,S_{13}(3)=S_{14}(2)+S_6(2),\\
S_{14}(3)&=S_{15}(2)-S_{11}(2),\,S_{15}(3)=S_{15}(2)+S_{11}(2).
\end{align*}
Therefore,
we have that $V=T^{(3)}S(3)$, where
$$
T^{(3)}=\left[
\begin{smallmatrix}
0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \\
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 20 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 8 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\
0 & 0 & 0 & 20 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\
0 & 30 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \\
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 6 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 8 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\
0 & 0 & 0 & 25 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\
1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \\
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 11 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 23 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\
0 & 0 & 0 & 11 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\
30 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \\
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 25 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\
0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 23 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\
0 & 0 & 0 & 6 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0
\end{smallmatrix}
\right] .
$$
The required number of multiplications is 10 (4 pre-multiplications, 2
multiplications in column 4, 2 multiplications in column 5, 1 multiplication in column 7
and 1 multiplication in column 8). The number of
additions is 60 (44 pre-additions, 16 post-additions). A complexity
comparison of $N$-point FFHT fast algorithms (for $N=8$ and $N=16$)
is given in
Tables~\ref{tabela1} and~\ref{tabela2}.
\begin{table}
\begin{center}
\caption{Complexity of the $8$-point FFHT}
\begin{tabular}{ccccccc}
\toprule
Fast algorithms & $M(8)$ & $A(8)$ & $ M(8)+A(8)$ \\
\midrule
Cooley-Tukey-4 & 12 & 48 & 60 \\
Split-Radix & 8 & 42 & 50 \\
Cooley-Tukey-2 & 4 & 26 & 30 \\
Rader-Brenner & 2 & 24 & 26 \\
Proposed & 2 & 22 & 24 \\
\bottomrule
\end{tabular}
\label{tabela1}
\end{center}
\end{table}
\begin{table}
\caption{Complexity of the $16$-point FFHT}
\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{ccccccc}
\toprule
Fast algorithms & $M(16)$ & $A(16)$ &
$M(16)+A(16)$ \\
\midrule
Cooley-Tukey-2 & 20 & 74 & 94 \\
Cooley-Tukey-4 & 14 & 70 & 84 \\
Split-Radix & 12 & 64 & 76 \\
Rader-Brenner & 10 & 64 & 74 \\
Proposed & 10 & 60 & 70\\
\bottomrule
\end{tabular}
\label{tabela2}
\end{center}
\end{table}
In the above examples, the Hadamard
decomposition algorithm presents a lower complexity to compute an FFHT
compared to existing FFFT/DFT\ algorithms. Multiplicative complexity saving
regarding classical Cooley-Tukey is 50\% ($N=16$ and $N=8$). The total complexity
saving regarding the same algorithm is roughly \linebreak 25\% ($N=16$), 20\% ($N=8$).
\section{Conclusions}
Fast algorithms
for the finite field Hartley transform
based on Walsh-Hadamard decompositions
were developed and applied to short blocklengths.
The theoretical multiplicative complexity lower bounds
were achieved.
The total complexity (additive and multiplicative)
of the algorithms was compared to
that of popular algorithms and
the lower values were obtained for the FT.
These FTs are
attractive
and easy to implement using low-cost high-speed dedicated
circuitry.
\section*{Acknowledgments}
This work was partially supported by CNPq and CAPES.
|
\section{Introduction}
\IEEEPARstart{S}{crew} extruders have become very popular for their ability to manufacture
food and plastics products with desired shapes and properties. Due to the strong interaction between the mass,
the energy and the momentum balances occurring
in those processes, the design of efficient controllers still remains a hard task at the industrial level. So far, the control oriented
model of extruders are issued from some black box model of limited operational validity. Following the objectives
of the control, these models describes the extruder's temperature and flow rate at the die output or the pressure
dynamics based on single input and single output or multiple input and multiple output system.
Generally, extrusion processes are controlled using \emph{PID} \cite{MANOJ95, MMCA07, JUSTIN97}
or predictive controllers \cite{STUART00, Diagne13} with oversimplified
or empirical models. In \cite{MANOJ95}, the volumetric expansion of the extrudate correlated to the die
temperature and pressure and the specific mechanical energy is
chosen as the key product quality to be controlled. The authors study the performance
of the \emph{PI} controller based on the regulation of the die pressure using
feed rate as a manipulative variable and show that the
response of an improperly tuned controller may be too
sluggish on one hand, or too oscillatory on the other hand. First-order, second-order and Lead-lag Laplace
transfer-function are exploited in \cite{ROSANA90} to design a feedforward controller for a twin-screw
food extrusion process to reduce the effect
of feed rate and feed moisture content variations on the
die pressure. The experimental results showed that the die pressure response varies with the operation
conditions, so a single gain value would not be suitable for all operating conditions.
The complexity of the process suggests adaptive control methods because of the frequent changes occurring
during the extruder operation in the feed composition \cite{ROSANA90}. \cite{Lu1993}
uses second-order transfer functions while emphasizing the difficulty in implementing those types of model-based
controllers due to the strong influence of all the manipulated inputs and measurable
process variables. Therefore, very intelligent
controllers need to be constructed for extrusion
cooking process based on a control algorithm
developed from process experience.
We mention that the transport delays, the strong interactions and the non-linearities make it difficult to
control such systems with \emph{PID} controllers. Predictive controllers might offer better
performances but are somewhat difficult to implement \cite{Correa93}.
In the present work, we consider the stabilization of
the die pressure to the desired setpoint in a food extrusion process. The controller is constructed based
on a bi-zone model derived from the computation of
the conservation of mass in the extruder under the assumption of constant temperature and viscosity.
A Geometric decomposition of the extruder length in
\emph{ Partially Filled Zone (PFZ) } and \emph{ Fully Filled Zone (FFZ) } allows to describe the
process by a transport equation and a pressure-gradient equation defined on complementary time varying spatial domains.
The domains are coupled by a moving
interface whose dynamics is governed by an \emph{ODE} representing the total mass balance in
an extruder. We emphasize that an accurate die pressure regulation is critical to ensure the uniformity
of the extruded melt and is strongly related to the quality of the final product.
We propose a suitable feedback control laws together
with practical measurements as output such that the solution of the closed-loop system
converges to a desired steady-state or equilibrium asymptotically.
The stabilization problems for hyperbolic systems has been widely studied in the literature.
The first approach relies on careful analysis of the classical solutions along
the characteristics. We refer to Greenberg and Li \cite{LiJMG} in the
case of second-order system of conservation laws and more general situations on $n$th-order systems by Li in \cite{LiSt1}.
Another approach based on Lyapunov techniques was introduced by Coron et al. in \cite{CAB1}.
This approach was improved by in \cite{CAB2} where a strict Lyapunov function in terms of Riemann invariants
was constructed and its time derivative can be made negative definite by choosing properly the boundary conditions.
The Lyapunov function is very useful to analyze nonlinear hyperbolic systems of conservation laws because of its rubustness,
see \cite{CoronBook, Coron08, DiagneCoron, CAB2, CWang13, XuCZ02, XuCZ09} for a wide range of applications to various models.
Among which, we are interested in a physical model for the
extrusion process which occurs very often in polymer material and food production.
The main contribution of this paper is to establish the exponential stabilization
for the extrusion model under natural feedbacks by a Lyapunov function approach motivated by \cite{CAB2, CWang13, XuCZ02}.
The difficulties come from three aspects: 1) The domains on which the conservation laws are
defined depend on the solution through the dynamical interface;
2) The nonlinear coupling of the dynamics of the interface and the filling ratio
in the \emph{Partially Filled Zone (PFZ)} is not standard;
3) The measurements and the feedbacks are natural, however,
some of the measurements are indirect, i.e.,
the measurements are not a part of solution but given through a indirect relation of solution.
The organization of the paper is as follows.
In Section \ref{sec2}, we give the physical description of the model.
The main result on stabilization (Theorem \ref{thm1})
and its proof are given in Section \ref{sec3}.
Numerical simulations are provided in Section \ref{sec4}.
Finally in Section \ref{sec5}, we give our conclusion and some perspectives in control of the extrusion process.
\section{Description of the model} \label{sec2}
An extruder is a process used for manufacturing objects
with fixed shapes and specific properties, see Fig. \ref{fig1}. One or two Archimedean screws
are rotating inside the barrel in order to convect the extruded material from the feed to the die exit.
In food or polymers extrusion processes, the ultimate control systems
involved manipulation of screw speed, feed rate, inlet solvent fraction,
and barrel temperature for the regulation of moisture content, temperature and viscosity of the finite product, residence time and die flow, etc.
\begin{figure}[h]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[scale=0.5]{extrudiag}
\caption{A single-screw screw extruder} \label{fig1}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
In this paper, we consider the mass balances model \cite{Diagne, DSW1} motivated by \cite{KULSH92,CHIN01} for cooking extrusion process.
In this case, the material convection along the extruder chamber of length $L$ is described in two zones: the \emph{PFZ} ($[0,l(t)]$ in space)
and a \emph{FFZ} ($[l(t),L]$ in space) separated by a moving interface $l(t)$.
The \emph{PFZ} and the \emph{FFZ} appear due to the die resistance that provokes an accumulation phenomena
and high pressure need to be built-up to evict the extrudate out of the die.
By the mass conservation principle the convection in the \emph{PFZ} is
described by the evolution of the filling ratio $f_p(t,x)$ for an homogeneous melt.
The melt convection speed in the \emph{PFZ}, namely, $\alpha_p$ depends
on the screw speed $N(t)$ whereas the \emph{FFZ} transport velocity is related to the die pressure
$P(t,L)$: $\alpha_p \neq \alpha_f$.
Under the assumption of constant viscosity $\eta$ along the extruder,
the dynamics of the moving interface $l(t)$ is governed by an \emph{ODE}
arising from the difference of the convection speed in the two regions. The flow rate in the \emph{FFZ} is constant and
equal to the die flow rate $F_d(t)$ which is proportional to the pressure difference
$\Delta P(t) := P(t,L)-P_0$ where $P_0$ denotes the atmospheric pressure.
For more detailed physical description of the model and definition of all the parameters appeared below,
one can refer to \cite{Diagne,DSW1}.
In this work, the stabilization of $(l(t),f_p(t,x))$ with the help of the actuated
screw speed $N(t)$ and inlet flow rate $F_{in}(t)$ is established
based on feedbacks that depend on the pressure difference $\Delta P(t)$ that is a practically useful measurement for the system.
Considering the following change of variables
\begin{equation} \label{change-var}
x \mapsto y =\frac{x}{l(t)}\ \text{in \emph{PFZ}}
\ \text{and} \
x\mapsto y=\frac{x-l(t)}{L-l(t)} \ \text{in \emph{FFZ}},
\end{equation}
respectively, the time varying domains ($[0,l(t)]$, $[l(t),L]$) can be transformed to the fixed domain $[0,1]$ in space.
For the sake of simplicity, we still denote by $x$ the space variable instead of $y$.
More precisely, we consider the stabilization problem for the corresponding normalized
system on the spatial domain $[0,1]$.
The interface dynamics which arises from a total mass balance writes
\begin{equation}\label{eqn-l}
\begin{cases}
\dot{l}(t)=\mathcal{F}(l(t),N(t),f_p(t,1)),\quad &\text{in}\ \mathbb{R}^+=(0,\infty),\\
l(0)=l^0,
\end{cases}
\end{equation}
where
\begin{equation} \label{F}
\mathcal{F}(l(t),N(t),f_p(t,1))=\frac{ \frac{K_d}{\eta}\Delta P(t)-\rho_{o}V_{eff}N(t)f_{p}(t,1)}{\rho_{o}S_{eff}(1-f_{p}(t,1))},
\end{equation}
$K_d$ , $\rho_0$, $\eta$ denote the die conductance, the melt density and the viscosity, respectively.
$V_{eff}$ and $S_{eff}$ are the effective volume and section between a screw element and the extruder barrel, respectively.
\normalsize
Assuming a constant viscosity along the extruder (the isothermal case), the relation
\begin{equation} \label{Delta P}
\Delta P(t)= \mathcal{P}(N(t),l(t))
:=\frac{\eta\rho_{o}
V_{eff}N(t) (L-l(t))}{B\rho_{o} +K_d
(L-l(t))}
\end{equation}
is determined by integrating the pressure-gradient equation corresponding to the momentum balance in the \emph{FFZ}
and considering a pressure continuity coupling relation at the normalized interface, namely, $P(0,t)=P_0$ in the \emph{PFZ} \cite{DSW1}.
The filling ratio in the \emph{PFZ} writes
\begin{equation}\label{eqn-fp}
\begin{cases}
\partial_t f_p(t,x)+\alpha_p \partial_x f_p(t,x)=0, \quad &\text{in}\ \mathbb{R}^+\times(0,1), \\
f_p(0,x)=f^{0}_p(x),\quad &\text{in}\ (0,1),\\
f_p(t,0)=\frac{F_{in}(t)}{\rho_{o} V_{eff}N(t)},\quad &\text{in}\ \mathbb{R}^+,
\end{cases}
\end{equation}
where
\begin{align}\label{alpha-p}
\alpha_p=\frac{\zeta N(t)-x \mathcal{F}(l(t),N(t),f_p(t,1))}{l(t)}.
\end{align}
\section{Main result and its proof } \label{sec3}
Let us define the constant equilibrium $l_e\in(0,L)$, $f_{p_e}\in(0,1)$, $N_e$,
$\Delta P_e$, $\alpha_{p_e}$ and $F_{in_e}$ by
$F(l_e,N_e,f_{p_e})=0$, $\Delta P_e=\mathcal{P}(l_e,N_e)$,
$ \alpha_{p_e}=\frac{\zeta N_e}{l_e}$, $F_{in_e}=\rho_{o}V_{eff}N_e f_{p_e}$.
Denote the difference
$\bar l(t):=l(t)-l_e, \bar N(t):=N(t)-N_e, \bar f_p(t,x):=f_p(t,x)-f_{p_e}, \bar F_{in}(t):=F_{in}(t)-F_{in_e},
\Delta \bar P(t):=\Delta P(t)-\Delta P_e$
and the constants
\begin{equation} \label{ai-bj}
\begin{cases}
(a_1,a_2,a_3) = \Big ( \frac{\partial F}{\partial l}, \frac{\partial F}{\partial N}, \frac{\partial F}{\partial f_p}\Big) \Big|_{(l_e,N_e,f_{p_e})},
\\
(b_1,b_2)= \Big( \frac{\partial \mathcal{P}}{\partial l}, \frac{\partial \mathcal{P}}{\partial N}\Big )\Big|_{(l_e,N_e)}.
\end{cases}
\end{equation}
The linear feedback law that we use is the following one:
\begin{equation}\label{feed1}
\bar N(t)=k_1\cdot\Delta \bar P(t),\quad
\bar F_{in}(t)=k_2\cdot\Delta \bar P(t),
\end{equation}
where $\Delta P(t)$, thus $\Delta \bar P(t)$, is measurable.
The aim of stabilization is to find constants $k_1,k_2 \in \mathbb{R}$ such that the closed-loop system
\eqref{eqn-l} and \eqref{eqn-fp} with feedback \eqref{feed1}
is asymptotically stable, i.e.,
$(\bar l(t), \bar f_p(t,\cdot)) \rightarrow 0 $ as $t\rightarrow\infty$.
Concerning the well-posedness of the Cauchy problem \eqref{eqn-l} and
\eqref{eqn-fp} with feedback \eqref{feed1}, we have the following proposition.
\begin{prop}\label{prop1}
Let $k_1,k_2\in \mathbb{R}$ be fixed.
There exists $\varepsilon>0$ such that for any $l^0\in \mathbb R$, $f^0_p\in H^2(0,1)$ satisfying
$ |l^0-l_e|^2+\|f^0_p(\cdot)-f_{p_e}\|^2_{H^2(0,1)}\leqslant \varepsilon$,
and the compatibility conditions at the point $(t,x)=(0,0)$,
system \eqref{eqn-l} and \eqref{eqn-fp}
with \eqref{feed1} has a unique solution
$(l,f_p) \in W^{1,\infty}([0,T)) \times C^0([0,T);H^2(0,1))$ for some $T\in (0,\infty]$. Moreover,
if
$ |l(t)-l_e|^2+\|f_p(t,\cdot)-f_{p_e}\|^2_{H^2(0,1)} \leqslant \varepsilon $ for all $ t\in [0,T),$
then $T=\infty$.
\end{prop}
\begin{remark}
The compatibility conditions at the point $(t,x)=(0,0)$ are the following:
\begin{align}\label{compa1}
& f_p^0(0) = \frac{F_{in}(0)}{\rho_{o} V_{eff} N(0)};
\\
& \frac{\dot F_{in}(0)N(0)-F_{in}(0) \dot N(0) }{ \rho_{o} V_{eff} N(0)}
+\frac{\zeta N(0)}{l^0} f_p^{0'}(0)=0, \label{compa2}
\end{align}
where $N(0), F_{in}(0)$ are determined by \eqref{Delta P}, \eqref{feed1} with $l(0)=l^0$,
while $\dot N(0)$, $\dot F_{in}(0)$ are determined
by differentiating \eqref{Delta P} and \eqref{feed1} together with $\dot l(0)= F(l^0, N(0), f_p^0(1))$.
\end{remark}
The proof of Proposition \ref{prop1} is based on fixed point argument and one can refer to
\cite{DSW1} for the well-posedness of the corresponding open-loop system.
Our main result on stabilization of the interface position $l(t)$ and the filling ratio $f_p(t,x)$ is the following theorem.
\begin{thm}\label{thm1}
Suppose that there exist $k_1,k_2 \in \mathbb{R}$ such that
\begin{align}\label{k1}
&a_1+\frac{k_1 a_2 b_1}{1-k_1 b_2}<0, \\ \label{k2}
& \left |\frac{a_3 b_1(k_2-f_{p_e}\rho_{o}V_{eff}k_1)}{\rho_{o}V_{eff}N_e(1-k_1b_2)} \right |
< \left |a_1+\frac{k_1 a_2 b_1}{1-k_1 b_2} \right |,
\end{align}
where $a_1,a_2,a_3,b_1,b_2$ are given in \eqref{ai-bj}.
Then, the nonlinear system \eqref{eqn-l} and \eqref{eqn-fp}
is locally exponentially stable under the feedback \eqref{feed1}, i.e.,
there exist constants $\varepsilon>0$, $M>0$ and $\omega>0$
such that for any $l^0\in \mathbb R$, $f^0_p\in H^2(0,1)$ satisfying
\begin{equation} \label{small init}
|l^0-l_e|^2+\|f^0_p(\cdot)-f_{p_e}\|^2_{H^2(0,1)}\leqslant \varepsilon,
\end{equation}
and the compatibility conditions at the point $(t,x)=(0,0)$,
the solution of \eqref{eqn-l} and \eqref{eqn-fp} with \eqref{feed1} satisfies
\begin{align}
& |l(t)-l_e|^2+\|f_p(t,\cdot)-f_{p_e}\|^2_{H^2(0,1)} \nonumber \\
& \leqslant M e^{-\omega t}\Big(|l^0-l_e|^2+\|f^0_p(\cdot)-f_{p_e}\|^2_{H^2(0,1)}\Big),
\quad \forall t\geqslant 0.
\end{align}
\end{thm}
Before the proof of Theorem \ref{thm1}, we give several remarks.
\begin{remark}
The existence of $k_1,k_2\in \mathbb R$ satisfying
\eqref{k1}-\eqref{k2} depends on $a_1,a_2,a_3, b_1,b_2$,
see Proposition \ref{prop2} below. Its proof is given in Appendix.
\end{remark}
\begin{prop}\label{prop2}
There exist $k_1,k_2\in \mathbb R$ such that
\eqref{k1}-\eqref{k2} hold
if and only if either 1) $a_1<0$; or 2) $a_1\geqslant 0$ and $a_2b_1 \neq 0$.
\end{prop}
\begin{remark}
The measurement on $\Delta P(t)$ is of practical reason, thus the feedback \eqref{feed1} is indirect
in the sense that the measurements are made not on the solution $(l(t),f_p(t,x))$ itself.
\end{remark}
\begin{remark}
The proof of Theorem \ref{thm1} relies on a Lyapunov function approach.
The weight as $e^{-\gamma_i x}$ is essential to get a strict Lyapunov function.
One can refer to the stabilization results by such weighted Lyapunov functions,
for quite general linear hyperbolic systems in \cite{XuCZ02,XuCZ09};
for one dimensional Euler equation with variable coefficients in \cite{GugatWang};
for a conservation law with nonlocal velocity in \cite{CWang13}.
\end{remark}
\noindent
{\bf Proof of Theorem \ref{thm1}:}
The construction of the Lyapunov functions is divided into three steps.
{\it Step 1. The stabilization of $l(t)$ and $f_p(t,\cdot)$ in $L^2(0,1)$.}
Let
\begin{align}
V_0(t)=\bar l^2(t), \quad
\label{def-V1}
V_1(t)=\int_0^1 e^{-\gamma_1 x}\bar f^2_p(t,x)\, dx,
\end{align}
where $ \gamma_1>0$ is a constant to be chosen later.
\begin{lem} \label{lem1}
There exist positive constants $A_1,\gamma_1,\beta_0,\beta_1,\delta_1$
such that the following estimates hold for every solution to system \eqref{eqn-l} and \eqref{eqn-fp}
with \eqref{feed1}
\begin{align} \label{dot V0V1}
\dot V_0(t) +A_1 \dot V_1(t) \leqslant & -(\beta_0+o(1)) V_0(t)
-(\beta_1+o(1)) V_1(t) \nonumber
\\ & - (\delta_1+o(1)) \bar f_p^2(t,1),
\end{align}
where $o(1)$ represents various terms which tend to $0$ when
$|(\bar l(t),\bar N(t),\bar f_p(t,1)) |\rightarrow 0.$
\end{lem}
\noindent
{\bf Proof of Lemma \ref{lem1}:}
By definition of the equilibrium $(l_e,N_e,f_{p_e})$ and
the constants $(a_1,a_2,a_3,b_1,b_2)$, it is easy to get by expansion that
\begin{align}\label{est-F}
&\mathcal{F}(l(t),N(t),f_p(t,1))
=(a_1+o(1))\, \bar l(t)+(a_2+o(1))\, \bar N(t)\nonumber\\
&\hspace{36mm} +(a_3+o(1))\, \bar f_p(t,1),
\\ \label{est-Delta P}
&\Delta\bar P(t)
=(b_1+o(1))\, \bar l(t)+(b_2+o(1))\, \bar N(t).
\end{align}
Furthermore, it follows from \eqref{feed1} and \eqref{est-Delta P} that
\begin{align}\label{est-Delta P2}
\Delta \bar P=&
\Big(\frac{b_1}{1-k_1b_2}+o(1)\Big)\bar l(t),\\
\label{est-N}
\bar N(t)=&\Big(\frac{k_1 b_1}{1-k_1b_2}+o(1)\Big)\bar l(t),\\
\label{est-Fin}
\bar F_{in}(t)=&\Big(\frac{k_2 b_1}{1-k_1b_2}+o(1)\Big)\bar l(t).
\end{align}
Differentiating $V_0(t)$ with respect to $t$ and using \eqref{eqn-l}, \eqref{est-F} and
\eqref{est-N}, one easily gets that
\begin{align} \label{est-V0}
\nonumber
\dot V_0(t)=& 2\bar l(t)\cdot \mathcal{F}(l(t),N(t),f_p(t,1))
\\ =& (2 \theta_0+o(1) ) \bar l^2(t)
+ (2a_3+o(1))\bar l(t)\bar f_p(t,1).
\end{align}
where
$\theta_0 = a_1+\displaystyle \frac{k_1 a_2 b_1}{1-k_1b_2} <0.$
On the other hand,
\eqref{alpha-p} and \eqref{est-F} yield that
\begin{align}\label{est-alpha px}
\alpha_p=\alpha_{p_e}+o(1), \quad
\alpha_{p_x}=o(1).
\end{align}
Differentiating $V_1(t)$ gives,
from \eqref{def-V1}, \eqref{est-alpha px}, \eqref{est-alpha px} and integration by parts, that
\begin{align}\label{est-V1}
\dot V_1(t)
=& BT_1+\int_0^1 (-\gamma_1\alpha_p +\alpha_{p_x} )e^{-\gamma_1 x}\bar f^2_p(t,x)\, dx\nonumber\\
=& BT_1- (\gamma_1\alpha_{p_e}+o(1))V_1(t),
\end{align}
where
\begin{equation}\label{BT1}
BT_1=-e^{-\gamma_1}(\alpha_{p_e}+o(1))\bar f^2_p(t,1)+(\alpha_{p_e}+o(1)) \bar f^2_p(t,0).
\end{equation}
Note that by \eqref{eqn-fp},\eqref{est-N}-\eqref{est-Fin}, we have
\begin{align}\label{est-fp0-2}
\bar f_p(t,0)
=\frac{F_{in}(t)}{\rho_{o} V_{eff}N(t)}-f_{p_e}
= (\theta_1+o(1) )\bar l(t),
\end{align}
where
$\theta_1= \frac{b_1(k_2-f_{p_e}\rho_{o}V_{eff}k_1)}{\rho_{o}V_{eff}N_e(1-k_1b_2)}$.
Combining \eqref{est-alpha px}, \eqref{est-V1}, \eqref{BT1}, \eqref{est-fp0-2}, we get consequently
\begin{align}\label{est-V1-2}
\dot V_1(t)=& -(\gamma_1\alpha_{p_e}+o(1) )V_1(t)
-( e^{-\gamma_1} \alpha_{p_e} +o(1) )\bar f^2_p(t,1)\nonumber \\
& + (\alpha_{p_e} \theta_1^2 + o(1)) V_0(t).
\end{align}
Under the assumption of \eqref{k1}-\eqref{k2},
it is easy to get the existence of $A_1>0$ and $\gamma_1>0$ (suitably small) such that
\begin{equation}
\left ( \begin{matrix}
2\theta_0 +A_1 \alpha_{p_e} \theta_1^2 & a_3 \\
a_3 & -A_1 e^{-\gamma_1} \alpha_{p_e} \\
\end{matrix}
\right)
\end{equation}
is negative definite.
This concludes the proof of Lemma \ref{lem1} with \eqref{est-V0} and \eqref{est-V1-2}. \qed
{\it Step 2. The stabilization of $f_{p_x}(t,\cdot)$ in $L^2(0,1)$.}
Differentiating \eqref{eqn-fp} with respect to $x$, we get
\begin{equation}\label{eqn-fpx}
\begin{cases}
f_{p_{xt}}+\alpha_p f_{p_{xx}}+\alpha_{p_x}f_{p_x}=0,\\
f_{p_x}(0,x)=f^{0'}_p(x),\\
f_{p_x}(t,0)=\displaystyle\frac{- f_{p_t}(t,0)}{\alpha_p |_{x=0} },
\end{cases}
\end{equation}
where
\begin{equation}\label{def-fpt}
f_{p_t}(t,0)
=\frac{\dot F_{in}(t)N(t)-F_{in}(t)\dot N(t)}{\rho_{o}V_{eff}N^2(t)}.
\end{equation}
Let
\begin{equation}\label{def-V2}
V_2(t)=\int_0^1 e^{-\gamma_2x}f^2_{p_x}(t,x)\, dx,
\end{equation}
where $ \gamma_2>0$ is a constant.
\begin{lem} \label{lem2}
There exist positive constants $\gamma_2,\beta_2, \delta_2,\theta_2$
such that the following estimate holds for every solution to system \eqref{eqn-l} and \eqref{eqn-fp}
with \eqref{feed1}
\begin{align} \label{dot V2}
\dot V_2(t) \leqslant & -(\beta_2+o(1)) V_2(t) - (\delta_2+o(1)) f_{p_x}^2(t,1)
\nonumber\\
&+\theta_2 (V_0(t) +\bar f_p^2(t,1) ).
\end{align}
\end{lem}
\noindent
{\bf Proof of Lemma \ref{lem2}.}
Differentiating \eqref{Delta P} and \eqref{feed1} with respect to $t$ gives that,
\begin{equation}\label{dot-feed}
\begin{cases}
\dot N(t)=k_1\cdot \Delta \dot P(t),\quad
\dot F_{in}(t)=k_2\cdot \Delta \dot P(t),\\
\small \Delta \dot P(t)=\frac{\partial \mathcal{P}}{\partial l}\big|_{(l(t),N(t))} \dot l(t)
+ \frac{\partial \mathcal{P}}{\partial N}\big|_{(l(t),N(t))} \dot N(t).
\end{cases}
\end{equation}
Then it follows from \eqref{eqn-l}, \eqref{ai-bj}, \eqref{est-F}, \eqref{est-Delta P2} and \eqref{dot-feed} that
\begin{align}\label{dot-Delta P}
\Delta \dot P(t)=
&\frac{\frac{\partial \mathcal{P}}{\partial l}\big|_{(l(t),N(t))} }{1-k_1\frac{\partial \mathcal{P}}{\partial N}\big|_{(l(t),N(t))}}\cdot \dot l(t)\nonumber\\
=&O(1)(\bar l(t)+\bar N(t)+\bar f_p(t,1)),
\end{align}
where $O(1)$ denotes various terms which are uniformly bounded
when $|(\bar l(t),\bar N(t),\bar f_p(t,1))| \rightarrow 0$.
Combining \eqref{est-N}, \eqref{eqn-fpx}-\eqref{def-fpt} and \eqref{dot-feed}-\eqref{dot-Delta P}, we get easily that
\begin{align}\label{fpx0}
f_{p_x}(t,0)
=&O(1)(\bar l(t)+\bar f_p(t,1)).
\end{align}
Differentiating \eqref{def-V2} results in,
by \eqref{est-alpha px}, \eqref{est-alpha px} and \eqref{eqn-fpx}, that
\begin{align}\label{est-dot V2}
\dot V_2(t)
=&BT_2 +\int_0^1(-\gamma_2\alpha_p
-\alpha_{p_x})e^{-\gamma_2x}f^2_{p_x}(t,x)\, dx\nonumber\\
=& BT_2+(-\gamma_2\alpha_{p_e}+o(1))V_2(t),
\end{align}
where
\begin{align}\nonumber
BT_2=& (-e^{-\gamma_2}\alpha_{p_e}+o(1)) f^2_{p_x}(t,1)
\\&+(\alpha_{p_e}+o(1))f^2_{p_x}(t,0). \label{BT2}
\end{align}
Thanks to \eqref{est-alpha px} and \eqref{fpx0}, \eqref{BT2} can be rewritten as
\begin{align} \nonumber
BT_2= &(-e^{-\gamma_2}\alpha_{p_e}+o(1))f^2_{p_x}(t,1)
\\ &+O(1)(\bar l^2(t)+\bar f^2_p(t,1)),
\end{align}
which ends the proof of Lemma \ref{lem2} with \eqref{est-dot V2}.
\qed
{\it Step 3. The stabilization of $f_{p_{xx}}(t,\cdot)$ in $L^2(0,1)$.}
By differentiating \eqref{eqn-fpx}, note that $\alpha_{p_{xx}}=0$, we derive that
\begin{equation}\label{eqn-fpxx}
\begin{cases}
f_{p_{xxt}}+\alpha_p f_{p_{xxx}}+2\alpha_{p_x}f_{p_{xx}}=0,\\
f_{p_{xx}}(0,x)=f^{0''}_p(x),\\
f_{p_{xx}}(t,0)=\displaystyle\frac{- f_{p_{xt}}(t,0)+\alpha_{p_x} |_{x=0} f_{p_x}(t,0)}{\alpha_p|_{x=0} },
\end{cases}
\end{equation}
where
\begin{align}\label{fpxt0}
f_{p_{xt}}(t,0)=
\frac{d}{dt}\Big(\frac{-1}{\alpha_p |_{x=0} }\cdot \frac{\dot F_{in}(t)N(t)-F_{in}(t)\dot N(t)}{\rho_{o}V_{eff}N^2(t)}\Big).
\end{align}
Let
\begin{equation}\label{def-V3}
V_3(t):=\int_0^1 e^{-\gamma_3x}f^2_{p_{xx}}(t,x)\, dx,
\end{equation}
where $\gamma_3>0$ is a positive constant.
\begin{lem} \label{lem3}
There exist positive constants $\gamma_3,\beta_3, \delta_3,\theta_3$
such that the following estimate holds for every solution to system \eqref{eqn-l} and \eqref{eqn-fp}
with \eqref{feed1}
\begin{align} \label{dot V3}
\dot V_3(t) \leqslant & -(\beta_3+o(1)) V_3(t) - (\delta_3+o(1)) f_{p_{xx}}^2(t,1)
\nonumber\\ &+\theta_3 (V_0(t) +\bar f_p^2(t,1)+ f^2_{p_x}(t,1)).
\end{align}
\end{lem}
\noindent
{\bf Proof of Lemma \ref{lem3}.}
Differentiating \eqref{def-V3} gives, by \eqref{est-alpha px}, \eqref{est-alpha px} and \eqref{eqn-fpxx}, that
\begin{align}\label{est-dot V3}
\dot V_3(t)
=&BT_3 +\int_0^1\Big[-\gamma_3\alpha_p -3\alpha_{p_x}\Big]e^{-\gamma_3x}f^2_{p_{xx}}\, dx\nonumber\\
=&BT_3+ (-\gamma_3\alpha_{p_e}+o(1) )V_3(t),
\end{align}
where
\begin{align}\nonumber
BT_3=&-(e^{-\gamma_3}\alpha_{p_e}+o(1))f^2_{p_{xx}}(t,1)
\\ \label{BT3}
&+(\alpha_{p_e}+o(1))f^2_{p_{xx}}(t,0).
\end{align}
In order to estimate $f_{p_{xx}}(t,0)$ or $f_{p_{xt}}(t,0)$,
essentially we need only to estimate $\ddot F_{in}(t)$ and $\ddot N(t)$,
according to \eqref{dot-feed} and \eqref{fpxt0}.
On the other hand,
\eqref{dot-feed} simply yields that
\begin{equation}\label{dot dot-feed}
\ddot N(t)=k_1\Delta \ddot P(t),\quad
\ddot F_{in}(t)=k_2\Delta \ddot P(t).
\end{equation}
Therefore, from \eqref{eqn-l}, \eqref{est-F}, \eqref{dot-feed} and \eqref{dot-Delta P}, we have
\begin{equation} \label{dot dot-Delta P}
\Delta \ddot P(t)
=O(1)\Big(\bar l(t)+\bar N(t)+\bar f_p(t,1)+f_{p_t}(t,1)\Big).
\end{equation}
From \eqref{fpxt0} to \eqref{dot dot-Delta P}, we get
\begin{align}\label{est-fpxt0}
f_{p_{xt}}(t,0)
=O(1)\Big(\bar l(t)+\bar N(t)+\bar f_p(t,1)+f_{p_t}(t,1)\Big).
\end{align}
Combining \eqref{eqn-fp}, \eqref{est-N}, \eqref{fpx0}, \eqref{eqn-fpxx} and \eqref{est-fpxt0}, we get further
\begin{align}\label{est-fpxx0}
f_{p_{xx}}(t,0)
=&O(1)\Big(\bar l(t)+\bar f_p(t,1)+f_{p_x}(t,1)\Big).
\end{align}
By \eqref{est-alpha px} and \eqref{est-fpxx0}, \eqref{BT3} becomes
\begin{align} \nonumber
BT_3= & -(e^{-\gamma_3}\alpha_{p_e}+o(1) )f^2_{p_{xx}}(t,1)
\\
&+O(1) (\bar l^2(t)+\bar f^2_p(t,1)+f^2_{p_x}(t,1)).
\end{align}
\normalsize
This implies the conclusion of Lemma \ref{lem3}.
\qed
{\it Step 4. The stabilization of $l(t)$ and $f_p(t,\cdot)$ in $H^2(0,1)$.}
Finally, let the Lyapunov function be
\begin{equation} \label{def-L}
L(t)=V_3(t) + A_3 (V_2(t)+A_2 (V_0(t)+A_1V_1(t))),
\end{equation}
where $A_1>0$ is such that \eqref{dot V0V1} holds and $A_2,A_3>0$ will be chosen later.
Obviously, $L(t)$ is equivalent to $\bar l^2(t) +\|\bar f_p(t,\cdot)\|^2_{H^2(0,1)}$.
Then, by \eqref{dot V0V1}, \eqref{dot V2}, \eqref{dot V3} and \eqref{def-L},
one can choose $A_2>0$ and $A_3>0$ successively large enough such that
\begin{equation}\label{est-dot L}
\dot L(t) \leqslant - (\beta+o(1)) L(t)
\end{equation}
for some constant $\beta>0$.
We assume in a priori that
\begin{equation} \label{small data}
|(\bar l(t),\bar N(t),\bar f_p(t,1))| \leqslant \varepsilon_0
\end{equation}
for some small $\varepsilon_0 >0$ such that
$ |o(1)| \leqslant \frac{\beta}{2}$ in \eqref{est-dot L}. Then $ \dot L(t)\leqslant - \frac{\beta}{2} L(t)$,
thus $ L(t)\leqslant L(0) e^{-\frac{\beta }{2} \, t}$.
Thanks to the assumption \eqref{small init},
\eqref{small data} can be satisfied for all $t\geq 0$ if $\varepsilon>0$ is small enough.
The proof of Theorem \ref{thm1} is thus complete. \qed
\section{ Simulations} \label{sec4}
Computing the time integration of the semi-discretized transport equations by finite volume
with ODE45 routine of MATLAB, the stability result
is achieved under the assumptions of Theorems \ref{thm1}.
Especially, the existence of $k_1,k_2$ is guaranteed by
$a_1<0$ according to Proposition \ref{prop2}.
The gain $k_1$ is chosen to satisfy (\ref{k1}) and (\ref{k2})
and $k_2$ is derived from the compatibility conditions (\ref{compa1}) and (\ref{compa2})
for which the inlet flow rate $F_{in}(0)$ and the screw speed $N(0)$ with their respective time derivatives
$\dot {F}_{in}(0)$ and $\dot{N}(0)$ are computed with the help of the feedback (\ref{feed1}) and the initial filling ratio $f^0_p(0)$.
\begin{itemize}
\item \textbf{Initial conditions:}\\
$ l^0=1.5 \, m$, $f^0_p(x)=0.6905+0.025(1-\cos(\pi x))+ 0.0117 \sin(\pi x)$
\item \textbf{Setpoint values:}\\
$ l_e=1.37 \,m$, $f_{pe}=0.6 $
\item \textbf{Gain values:}\\
$ k_1=0.01$, $ k_2=0.0001$
\item \textbf{Verification of assumptions \eqref{k1}-\eqref{k2}}\\
$a_1= -0.0119 <0$
\end{itemize}
\begin{figure}[htbp]
\centering
\begin{minipage}[t]{0.40\textwidth}
\centering
\includegraphics[scale=0.35]{plot2}
\vspace{-5mm}
\caption{ Feed rate $F_{in}(t)$ and Screw speed $N(t) $ }
\end{minipage}
\begin{minipage}[t]{0.40\textwidth}
\centering
\includegraphics[scale=0.35]{plot1}
\vspace{-5mm}
\caption{ Interface $l(t)$ and pressure difference $\Delta P(t)$ }
\end{minipage}
\begin{minipage}[t]{0.40\textwidth}
\centering
\includegraphics[scale=0.35]{plot4}
\vspace{-5mm}
\caption{ Filling ratio $\|f_p(t,\cdot)-f_{p_{e}}\|_{H^2(0,1)}$}
\end{minipage}
\end{figure}
\section{Conclusion} \label{sec5}
In this paper, we study the stabilization of
a physical model for the extrusion process,
which is described by conservation laws coupled through a dynamical interface.
The exponential stabilization is obtained for the closed-loop system with
natural feedback controls through indirect measurements.
The proof relies on Lyapunov approach.
Numerical simulations are made as supplementary to the theoretical results.
As a future work, it is interesting to study the controllability of boundary profile, i.e., to reach the desired moisture
and temperature at the die under suitable controls.
This problem is rather challenging for mathematical theory but also very useful in applications.
The proposed result is a first step towards controlling complex screw
extrusion systems that include unknown parameters and time-varying disturbances acting on the pressure dynamics and the viscosity in the FFZ.
|
\section{Introduction}
Light selection (or filtering light) based on the direction of propagation has long been a scientific and engineering challenge \cite{Schwartz:03,Upping2010102,de2007colloquium,le2012broadband,PhysRevLett.106.123902,Atwater_angular2013,Shen28032014,Shen_metamaterial,akozbek2012experimental,argyropoulos2013broadband,argyropoulos2012matching}. Narrowband angular selectivity has been demonstrated in the earlier years using resonance \cite{de2007colloquium}, photonic crystals \cite{Upping2010102}, and metamaterials \cite{Schwartz:03}. Achieving broadband angular selectivity, on the other hand, is more challenging, and has a potential of leading to even bigger fields of applications, such as energy harvesting \cite{Veronika_superlattice_2014,yeng2014global,bermel2011tailoring} and signal detection. Therefore, it has recently started drawing attention from researchers. Methods of using anisotropic photonic crystals \cite{PhysRevA.83.035806} plasmonic Brewster mode\cite{akozbek2012experimental,argyropoulos2013broadband,argyropoulos2012matching} and micro-scale geometrical optics \cite{Atwater_angular2013} have been investigated. However, to the best of our knowledge, yet none of the works have provided an experimental realization in the full visible spectrum. We previously reported broadband angular selectivity of light using photonic crystals (PhC) \cite{Shen28032014} and metamaterials \cite{Shen_metamaterial}. However, the PhC approach requires immersion into index matching gel for proper operation. In this report, we build upon the photonic crystals approach (which can be easily fabricated at large scale), and demonstrate experimentally for the first time a full visible spectrum angular selective filter that is capable of operation in air (i.e. air-compatible) and with adjustable angle of transparency. With improved implementations, we propose two general categories of applications of angular selectivity in the optical regime, with proof-of-concept experimental demonstrations. One application lies in increasing the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in light detection systems, while the second application concerns energy harvesting.
\section{Air-compatible implementation}
Our previous work \cite{Shen28032014} has shown that one can utilize the characteristic Brewster modes in one-dimensional hetero-structured photonics crystals \cite{joannopoulos2011photonic} to achieve broadband angular selectivity. However, the device demonstrated in \cite{Shen28032014} has some limitations. Firstly, it needs to be immersed in an index-matched liquid. In-air operation requires ultra-low index materials as one of the composition layers, which makes it hard to fabricate. Secondly, the Brewster angle at the interface of two dielectric media (in the lower index isotropic material) is always larger than 45$^{\circ}$. Here we introduce an implementation using macroscopic prisms to improve the previous design, such that the device can be directly used in the air without using ultra-low index materials. In addition, the angle of high transparency can be adjusted easily over a broad range, including normal incidence.
Conventional lossless dielectric materials have refractive index $n$ ranging between 1.4 and 2.3 in the visible spectrum\cite{2007PSSBR}. Following the design principle illustrated in Ref.~\citenum{Shen28032014}, if we choose two conventional materials with index $n_1$ and $n_2$ from the above category, assuming $n_1<n_2$, the Brewster angle (defined in material with index $n_1$) is given by:
\[\theta_{B,n_1}=\tan^{-1}\frac{n_2}{n_1}.\]
In order to couple into the Brewster mode in this material system from air, the incident angle (defined in air) needs to be:
\[\theta_{B,air}=\sin^{-1}\left(n_1\sin\theta_{B,n_1}\right).\]
Given that $\theta_{B,n_1}>45^{\circ}$, and $n_1\geq1.4$, the term in the bracket in the right hand side of the above equation is almost always bigger than 1. Therefore, it is challenging to use conventional lossless materials to build an angular selective device that can couple light from air. Porous thin film materials have lower refractive index \cite{2007PSSBR} and can be fabricated with oblique evaporation deposition \cite{so14929}. However, such technology is not yet capable of producing multilayered films.
\begin{figure}[htbp]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=3.5in]{Fig2.eps}
\caption{\textbf{Illustration of optical angular selective filter in air using prisms} (A) Oblique incidence prism design (B) Normal incidence prism design. The red beams represent the light rays coming in at the right direction so the prisms can couple the light into the Brewster mode inside the PhC slab. The black beams represent the light coming in from other directions so they cannot be coupled into the Brewster mode inside the PhC slab; hence they are reflected back into the prisms.}
\label{fig:fig2}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
Here, we propose an alternative approach, using macroscopic prisms to couple propagating light in the air and the Brewster modes in the PhC. A simple prism design is illustrated in Fig.~1A, where the angular selective PhC filter demonstrated in \cite{Shen28032014} is sandwiched by two dielectric masks with periodic triangular patterns. One can choose the material that has the same refractive index as one of the layers in the PhC slab. The geometry of the prism is designed to eliminate the refraction from air into the low-index material at the transparent angle. Light incident at $\theta_{B,n_1}$ is normal to the prism/air interface, hence will pass through the whole system. On the other hand, light incident from other directions will undergo different refractions, and will be reflected by the PhC slab.
An experimental demonstration of the prism implementation (Fig.~1A) is shown in Fig.~2. The prism is fabricated with Acrylic ($n=1.44$), and the surface of the prism is mechanically and chemicaly polished to enhance optical quality. The periodicity of the triangular pattern is $a=2$ mm and $\theta_B=55^{\circ}$. The PhC filter is adopted from \cite{Shen28032014} and embedded in the prism; the two materials used to make the PhC filter are SiO$_2$ ($n=1.45$) and Ta$_2$O$_5$ ($n=2.08$). The overall transparency of the system is up to 68\% to $p$-polarized incident light at $\theta_B=55^{\circ}$ (Fig.~2C); the angular window of transparency is about 8$^{\circ}$. While the peak transmittance of the sandwiched PhC filter itself is 98\% \cite{Shen28032014}, the peak transmittance of the whole system is weakened by implementing the prism. The air-prism interfaces on two sides of the system cause a 7\% reflection, which may be eliminated by applying an anti-reflective coating on the interfaces. The remaining losses are due to the imperfection of the prism fabrication. Better cutting and polishing of the prism can reduce scattering loss. It reflects light at all other angles over the entire visible spectrum (Fig.~2B,D). The $p$-polarized transmittance of the sample in the visible spectrum was measured using an ultraviolet-visible spectrophotometer (Cary 500i) and presented in Fig.~2E; Although the sample no longer behaves like a mirror at off-Brewster angle due to image distortion of the prism, the transmission spectrum (and reflection spectrum) is very close to the spectrum of the sample immersed in index-matched liquid ( in \cite{Shen28032014}).
\begin{figure*}[htbp]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=5in]{Fig3.eps}
\caption{\textbf{Demonstration of achieving angular selectivity in air} (A) Schematic view of the system setup. (B) Normal incident angle setup: the sample is reflective. (C) $\theta=55^{\circ}$ setup: the sample becomes transparent. (D) $\theta=75^{\circ}$ setup: the sample become reflective again. (E) Experimental measurement of the transmission spectrum of the prism-embedded sample.}
\label{fig:fig3}
\end{center}
\end{figure*}
One can change the angle of transparency of the system with careful design and alignment of the prisms on the top and bottom of the PhC slab. To show this, we propose the second design, which achieves angular selective window at normal incidence (Fig.~1(B)). In this design, the prisms are made up of materials having refractive index $n_3\approx2.1$ (e.g, L-BBH2 glass), and the three angles are $\theta_1=65^{\circ}$, $\theta_2=\theta_3=57.5^{\circ}$. With such a design, the light propagation direction inside the prism is always parallel to one edge of the prism; hence no light will be lost through the prism system. Detailed ray optics analysis that shows how this work is provided in the following section.
\section{Normal-incidence prism design}
One important thing to consider in designing the prism is that the prism itself should not block the light that is supposed to be transmitted at the transmission angle. Here we propose a prism design that uses L-BBH2 glass ($n_{L-BBH2}\approx2.1$ in the whole visible spectrum) to couple the light from normal incidence into the Brewster mode.
As shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:figureS1}, the prism is composed of a periodic array of isosceles triangles with $\theta_1=65^{\circ}$ and $\theta_2=\theta_3=57.5^{\circ}$. In this case, from Snell's law, the refractive angle can be calculated by:
\begin{equation}
n_{\mbox{\tiny{L-BBH2}}}\sin\theta_{2\_inc}=n_{air}\sin\theta_{1\_inc}
\end{equation}
where
\[\theta_{1\_inc}=90^{\circ}-(90^{\circ}-\theta_3)=\theta_3=57.5^{\circ}\]
therefore
\[\theta_{2\_inc}=\arcsin(\frac{n_{air}}{n_{L-BBH2}}\sin\theta_{1\_inc})=23.7^{\circ}.\]
Notice in this case the refracted ray is almost parallel to the left edge of the prism (it will be exactly parallel if $\theta_{2\_inc}=25^{\circ}$), hence most of the light coming in through the right edge of the prism will reach the Photonic Crystal (PhC) slab (instead of reaching the other edge of the prism). The same argument applies to the light coming in through the left edge of the prism.
Furthermore, from Fig.~\ref{fig:figureS1},
\[\theta_{3\_inc}=\theta_{1\_inc}-\theta_{2\_inc}=33.8^{\circ},\]
hence the angle of the ray coupled into the PhC slab (defined in SiO$_2$) can be calculated by:
\begin{equation}
\theta_{SiO_2}=\arcsin(\frac{n_{L-BBH2}}{n_{SiO_2}}\sin\theta_{3\_inc})=53.7^{\circ}\approx\theta_{B,SiO_2}
\end{equation}
\begin{figure}[htbp]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=3in]{supplementary.eps}
\caption{\textbf{Normal-incidence prism design (one unit block)} The red lines represent the light path inside the prism/slab system of normally incident light.}
\label{fig:figureS1}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
This shows the prism couples normal incident light into the Brewster angle of propagation inside the PhC slab. As mentioned in the main manuscript, light propagating at the Brewster angle inside the PhC slab will go through the whole PhC slab with almost no loss.
Since the PhC slab has a thickness ($\approx5\mu m$) that is much smaller than the prism scale ($\approx1mm$), the PhC slab can be considered as a thin film angular selective filter in the prism systems, which allows light coming in at only the Brewster angle to pass while reflecting all other light.
Finally, after the light ray has passed through the PhC slab, the light ray will undergo the same refraction and leave the lower prism at the same direction as it enters the upper prism (Fig.~\ref{fig:figureS1}), since the lower prism is identical to the upper prism. Notice that since the light propagation direction inside the prism is always parallel to one edge of the prism, all the light coming in through the left edge of the upper prism will reach the right edge of the bottom prism, while all the light coming in through the right edge of the upper prism will reach the left edge of the bottom prism. Hence no light will be lost through the prism system.
On the other hand, light coming in from other directions will undergo different refraction, and $\theta_{3\_inc}$ will no longer be $33.8^{\circ}$, thus will be reflected back by the angular selective PhC slab.
\section{Image preserved normal incident angular selective system design}
Although the prism designed in the above section successfully filters the light coming in at directions other than the normal incidence, it "flips" the light rays after they go through the prism system. As a result, the image before the prism will not be preserved after it goes through the prism. This is unacceptable for imaging applications.
One can restore the image by placing another identical prism-PhC system next to the first one. As demonstrated in Fig.~\ref{fig:figureS2}, the "flipped" light ray will be "flipped" again after the second prism system. In this case, the transmission image will be fully restored.
\begin{figure}[htbp]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=3.5in]{supplementary_2.eps}
\caption{\textbf{Normal-incidence, image-preserving angular selective system design.} Light rays are marked with different colors so that one can track where the incident light rays comes out after the whole system. At normal incidence, the transmitted light rays follow the same location as the incident light rays. Hence the image before and after the prism system will be preserved.}
\label{fig:figureS2}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
However, up to now we have not thought of a prism design that preserves both the transmitted image and the reflected image.
\section{Conclusion}
Based on the key concept of optical broadband angular selectivity proposed in \cite{Shen28032014}, with the aid of a prism coupler, this report demonstrate the first experimental realization of an air-compatible optical broadband angular selective filter. We show that the angle of transparency is also adjustable and we provide a second design for normal incident angular selective filter.
\vspace{24pt}
\noindent {\bf Acknowledgments: }
This work was partially supported by the Army Research Office through the ISN under Contract Nos.~W911NF-13-D0001. The fabrication part of the effort, as well as (partially) M.S. were supported by the MIT S3TEC Energy Research Frontier Center of the Department of Energy under Grant No. DE-SC0001299.
|
\section{Introduction}
In this paper, we consider the \textbf{Erd\H{o}s-R\'enyi random graph process}, which is a stochastic process that starts with $n$ vertices and no edges, and at each step adds one new edge chosen uniformly at random from the set of missing edges. Formally, let $e_1, e_2, \ldots, e_{n \choose 2}$ be a random permutation of the edges of the complete graph $K_n$. The graph process consists of the sequence of random graphs $( {\mathcal{G}}(n,m) )_{m=0}^{n \choose 2}$, where ${\mathcal{G}}(n,m)=(V,E_m)$, $V = [n] := \{1, 2, \ldots, n\}$, and $E_m = \{ e_1, e_2, \ldots, e_m \}$. It is clear that ${\mathcal{G}}(n,m)$ is a graph taken uniformly at random from the set of all graphs on $n$ vertices and $m$ edges (see, for example,~\cite{bol, JLR} for more details.)
Our results refer to the random graph process. However, it will be sometimes easier to work with the $\sG(n,p)$ model instead of ${\mathcal{G}}(n,m)$. The (binomial) \textbf{random graph} $\sG(n,p)$ consists of the probability space $(\Omega, \mathcal{F}, \Pr)$, where $\Omega$ is the set of all graphs with vertex set $[n]$, $\mathcal{F}$ is the family of all subsets of $\Omega$, and for every $G \in \Omega$,
$$
\Pr (G) = p^{|E(G)|} (1-p)^{{n \choose 2} - |E(G)|} \,.
$$
This space may be viewed as the set of outcomes of ${n \choose 2}$ independent coin flips, one for each pair $\{u,v\}$ of vertices, where the probability of success (that is, adding edge $uv$) is $p.$ Note that $p=p_n$ may (and usually does) tend to zero as $n$ tends to infinity.
\medskip
All asymptotics throughout are as $n \rightarrow \infty$ (we emphasize that the notations $o(\cdot)$ and $O(\cdot)$ refer to functions of $n$, not necessarily positive unless otherwise stated, whose growth is bounded; on the other hand, functions hidden in $\Theta(\cdot)$ and $\Omega(\cdot)$ notations are positive). We use the notation $a_n\sim b_n$ to denote $a_n=(1+o(1))b_n$. A sequence $a_n$ satisfies a certain property \textbf{eventually} if the property holds for all but finitely many terms of the sequence. We say that an event in a probability space holds \textbf{asymptotically almost surely} (or \textbf{a.a.s.}) if the probability that it holds tends to $1$ as $n$ goes to infinity. We often write ${\mathcal{G}}(n,m)$ and $\sG(n,p)$ when we mean a graph drawn from the distribution ${\mathcal{G}}(n,m)$ and $\sG(n,p)$, respectively. All logarithms in this paper are natural logarithms.
\bigskip
A \textbf{dominating set} for a graph $G = (V, E)$ is a subset $D$ of $V$ such that every vertex not in $D$ is adjacent to at least one member of $D$. The \textbf{domination number}, $\gamma(G)$, is the number of vertices in a smallest dominating set for $G$. The \textbf{bondage number}, $b(G)$, of a non-empty graph $G$ is the smallest number of edges that need to be removed in order to increase the domination number; that is,
$$
b(G) = \min\{ |B| : B \subseteq E, \gamma(G-B) > \gamma(G) \}.
$$
(If $G$ has no edges, then we define $b(G) = \infty$.)
This graph parameter was formally introduced in 1990 by Fink et al.~\cite{Fink} as a parameter for measuring the vulnerability of the interconnection network under link failure. However, it was considered already in 1983 by Bauer at al.~\cite{Bauer} as ``domination line-stability''. Moreover, graphs for which the domination number changes upon the removal of a single edge were investigated by Walikar and Acharya~\cite{Walikar} in 1979. One of the very first observations~\cite{Bauer, Fink} is the following upper bound:
$$
b(G) \le \min_{xy \in E} \{ \deg(x) + \deg(y) - 1 \} \le \Delta(G) + \delta(G)-1,
$$
where $\Delta(G)$ and $\delta(G)$ are the maximum and, respectively, the minimum degree of $G$. Since a.a.s.\ $\Delta(\sG(n,p)) \sim \delta(\sG(n,p)) \sim pn$ provided $pn \gg \log n$ (this follows immediately from Chernoff's bound stated below, and the union bound), we get that a.a.s.\
\begin{equation}\label{eq:trivialupper1}
b(\sG(n,p)) \le 2 pn (1+o(1))
\end{equation}
for $pn \gg \log n$. For denser graphs, one can improve the leading constant of this upper bound by using the following observation of Hartnell and Rall~\cite{Hartnell}:
$$
b(G) \le \min_{xy \in E} \{ \deg(x) + \deg(y) - 1 - |N(x) \cap N(y)| \}.
$$
It follows that if $p = \Omega(1)$, then a.a.s.\
$$
b(\sG(n,p)) \le (2 p - p^2) n (1+o(1)).
$$
Today, many properties of the bondage number are studied. For more details the reader is directed to the survey~\cite{survey} which cites almost 150 papers on the topic.
\section{Results}
Our goal is to investigate the bondage number of the binomial random graph on $n$ vertices and of the random graph process. Throughout the whole paper we will exclude the case $p = p_n \to 1$ and also assume that $p$ does not tend to zero too fast. More precisely, our main results require that $p=p_n$ eventually satisfies
\begin{equation}\label{eq:pdef}
n^{-1/3+\varepsilon} \leq p \leq 1-\varepsilon,
\end{equation}
for some constant $\varepsilon > 0$, but most arguments only require the following, milder, constraint:
\begin{equation*}
\log^2 n/\sqrt{n} \ll p \leq 1-\varepsilon.
\end{equation*}
Since our results are asymptotic in $n$, we will assume that $n$ is large enough so that all requirements in the argument are met. (In particular, the notation ``eventually'' is often implicitly assumed in the proofs and omitted.) Let $\cD_k$ be the set of dominating sets of size $k$ of $\sG(n,p)$, and let $X_k=|\cD_k|$. Clearly,
\begin{equation}\label{eq:fdef}
f(n,k,p) := \ex X_k = \binom{n}{k} \left(1-(1-p)^k\right)^{n-k}.
\end{equation}
For a given $p = p_n$, let
\begin{equation}\label{eq:rdef}
r = r_n = \min\{k \in\ensuremath {\mathbb N} : f(n,k,p) > 1/(pn) \}.
\end{equation}
Since $pn \gg \sqrt{n}\log^2 n > 1$ (eventually) and $f(n,n,p) = 1$, the function $r$ is well defined for $n$ sufficiently large.
\subsection{Random Graph Process}
Consider the random graph process $( {\mathcal{G}}(n,m) )_{0\le m \le {n \choose 2} }$. Clearly, the random variable $\gamma( {\mathcal{G}}(n,m) )$ is a non-increasing function of $m$, $\gamma( {\mathcal{G}}(n,0) ) = \gamma( \overline{K}_n ) = n$, and $\gamma( {\mathcal{G}}(n,{n \choose 2}) ) = \gamma(K_n) = 1$. Suppose that at some point the domination number drops down, that is, there exists a value of $m$ such that $\gamma( {\mathcal{G}}(n,m) ) = k+1$ but $\gamma( {\mathcal{G}}(n,m+1) ) = k$. The random graph process continues and, as long as the domination number remains to be equal to $k$, the bondage number, $b( {\mathcal{G}}(n,m+\ell) )$, is a non-decreasing function of $\ell$. Moreover, we get that $b( {\mathcal{G}}(n,m+\ell) ) \le \ell$, as one can remove the last $\ell$ edges that were added in the process (namely, $e_{m+1}, e_{m+2}, \ldots, e_{m+\ell}$) in order to increase the domination number. A natural and interesting question is then to ask how large the bondage number is right before the domination number drops again; that is, what can be said about $b( {\mathcal{G}}(n,m+\ell) )$ when $\gamma( {\mathcal{G}}(n,m+\ell) ) = k$ but $\gamma( {\mathcal{G}}(n,m+\ell+1) ) = k-1$? It turns out that, for the range of $k$ we are interested in, it is of the order of the maximum degree of ${\mathcal{G}}(n,m+\ell)$, and hence it matches the trivial, deterministic, upper bound mentioned in the introduction (up to a constant multiplicative factor). Here is the precise statement.
\begin{thm}\label{thm:main_gnd}
Given any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, let $k=k_n$ be such that eventually $ \varepsilon \log n \le k \le n^{1/3-\varepsilon}$. Then, there exists $m=m_n$ such that a.a.s.\
$$
\gamma( {\mathcal{G}}(n,m) ) = k \hspace{0.5in} \text{and} \hspace{0.5in} b( {\mathcal{G}}(n,m) ) = \Theta(\Delta( {\mathcal{G}}(n,m) )) = \Theta(m/n).
$$
\end{thm}
\subsection{Binomial Random Graph}
Consider now the binomial random graph $\sG(n,p)$. Before we state the main result for this probability space, let us mention some technical difficulties one needs to deal with. Our one-point concentration result (below) on the domination number of $\sG(n,p)$ amounts to showing that a.a.s.\ $X_r\ge1$ (since, trivially, a.a.s.\ $X_i=0$ for all $i\le r-1$). Moreover, our claim about the bondage number requires that a.a.s.\ $X_r = \Omega(pn) \to \infty$. This follows from the fact that the number of dominating sets of minimum cardinality is an upper bound on the bondage number (since each such set $D$ must have a vertex $v\notin D$ adjacent to only one vertex in $D$, and thus $D$ can be neutralized by removing a single edge). Therefore, we will restrict ourselves to situations in which $\ex X_r$ is large enough and prove concentration of $X_r$ around its mean. For technical reasons of the argument, we will require the aforementioned condition to hold for two consecutive values $n-1$ and $n$ (see~\eqref{eq:condI} and~\eqref{eq:Iprime} in Theorem~\ref{thm:main_general}). This motivates the assumptions on the ratio $p_{n+1}/p_n$ in the statement of Theorem~\ref{thm:main_gnp}.
We point out that, even for ``natural'' functions satisfying our assumptions, such as $p_n=1/2$, it is not clear whether there are always many dominating sets of minimum cardinality, or rather $X_{r_n}$ oscillates reaching both small and large values as $n$ grows. All we managed to show is that, for such $p_n$, almost all values of $n$ satisfy~\eqref{eq:condI} and~\eqref{eq:Iprime} and thus yield the bondage number as large as possible. To make this precise, a set $I\subseteq\ensuremath {\mathbb N} $ is said to be {\bf dense} if
\begin{equation}\label{eq:densedef}
\lim_{n\to\infty} \dfrac{|I\cap[n]|}{n}=1.
\end{equation}
In view of this definition, and recalling the definition of $r=r_n$ in~\eqref{eq:rdef}, our result for the binomial random graph can be stated as follows.
\begin{thm}\label{thm:main_gnp}
Given any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, let $p=p_n$ be such that eventually $n^{-1/3+\varepsilon} \le p \le 1-\varepsilon$. Moreover, suppose there exists a non-increasing non-negative sequence $h=h_n$ such that $p_{n+1}/p_n=1-\Theta(h_n/n)$. Then, there exists a dense set $I\subseteq\ensuremath {\mathbb N} $ such that, with asymptotics restricted to $n\in I$, a.a.s.\
$$
\gamma(\sG(n,p)) = r
\qquad\text{and}\qquad
b( \sG(n,p) ) = \Theta(\Delta( {\mathcal{G}}(n,p) )) = \Theta(pn).
$$
\end{thm}
Although the conditions on $p_n$ in Theorem~\ref{thm:main_gnp} seem restrictive, many common and natural probability functions $p_n$ satisfy it. For example, $p_n=n^{-1/4}$, $p_n=1/\log \log n$ and $p_n=1/2$ meet the requirements (by picking $h_n=1$, $h_n=1/\log n$ and $h_n=0$, respectively). Other, seemingly more complicated, choices such as $p_n = (n+1)^{-1/4}\log^3 n + n^{-1/3}$ also satisfy our conditions. On the other hand, mixed behaviours such as
\[
p_n=\begin{cases}n^{-1/4}&\text{$n$ even}\\1/\log \log n&\text{$n$ odd}\end{cases}
\]
are not considered here. One can easily relax the conditions on $p_n$ a bit further, but we do not aim for it, as it does not appear to be possible to express that in terms of any ``natural" assumptions such as ``$p_n$ being non-decreasing".
\subsection{General Result}
In fact, both Theorem~\ref{thm:main_gnd} and Theorem~\ref{thm:main_gnp} are implied by the following, slightly more general, result. It is known that even for sparser graphs (namely, for $p = p_n \gg \log^2 n/\sqrt{n}$, but bounded away from~1) a.a.s.\ the domination number of $\sG(n,p)$ takes one out of two consecutive integer values, $r$ or $r+1$, where $r=r_n$ is defined in~\eqref{eq:rdef} (see~\cite{GLS} and also~\cite{WG} for an earlier paper where denser graphs were considered). The next result shows that if $f(n,r,p)$ (that is, the expected number of dominating sets of cardinality $r$) is large, then we actually have one-point concentration and the bondage number is of order $pn$. Note that we may have to restrict asymptotics to an infinite subset of $\ensuremath {\mathbb N} $ that guarantees our assumptions on $f$.
\begin{thm}\label{thm:main_general}
Given any constant $\varepsilon>0$, suppose that $p=p_n$ eventually satisfies $n^{-1/3+\varepsilon} \leq p \leq 1-\varepsilon$, and let $f$ and $r$ be defined as in~\eqref{eq:fdef} and~\eqref{eq:rdef}. Suppose that there exists an infinite set $I'\subseteq\ensuremath {\mathbb N} $ and $\omega =\omega_n \to\infty$ such that
\begin{equation}\label{eq:condI}
\ex X_r = f(n,r,p) \geq \exp\left(\omega \log n\right)
\qquad
\text{(for $n\in I'$).
}
\end{equation}
Then, a.a.s.\
\[
\gamma( \sG(n,p) ) = r
\qquad
\text{(for $n\in I'$).
}
\]
Moreover, suppose that
\begin{equation}\label{eq:Iprime}
I = \{n\in\ensuremath {\mathbb N} : n\in I',\; n-1\in I'\}
\qquad
\text{has infinite cardinality.}
\end{equation}
Then a.a.s.\
\[
b( \sG(n,p) ) = \Theta(\Delta( \sG(n,p) )) = \Theta(pn)\qquad
\text{(for $n\in I$).
}
\]
\end{thm}
\begin{remark}\hspace{0cm}
\begin{itemize}
\item[(i)]
In many applications of Theorem~\ref{thm:main_general} (for instance, in the proofs of Theorems~\ref{thm:main_gnd} and~\ref{thm:main_gnp}), $I'$ is a dense subset of $\ensuremath {\mathbb N} $. Then, automatically $I$ is also dense, and thus has infinite cardinality as required.
\item[(ii)]
The first part of the theorem, which characterizes the domination number of $\sG(n,p)$, holds in fact for any $p=p_n$ satisfying $\log^2 n/\sqrt{n} \ll p\le 1-\varepsilon$ (see Corollary~\ref{cor:small_variance} below).
\end{itemize}
\end{remark}
\bigskip
The paper is structured as follows. In Section~\ref{sec:prelim}, we show that the results for ${\mathcal{G}}(n,m)$ and $\sG(n,p)$ can be obtained from Theorem~\ref{thm:main_general}. Section~\ref{sec:second} develops some tools required to estimate the second moment of $X_r$ and some other random variables. Finally, Section~\ref{sec:theorem} is devoted to prove Theorem~\ref{thm:main_general}.
\section{Preliminaries}\label{sec:prelim}
In this section we are going to introduce a few inequalities used in the paper, and we show some properties of the functions $r=r_n$ and $f(n,r,p)$ defined in~(\ref{eq:fdef}) and~(\ref{eq:rdef}). The function $p$ will be assumed to satisfy~(\ref{eq:pdef}). We will also show that Theorem~\ref{thm:main_gnd} and Theorem~\ref{thm:main_gnp} are implied by Theorem~\ref{thm:main_general}.
\bigskip
We will use the following version of Chernoff bound (see~e.g.~\cite{JLR}):
\begin{lem}[\textbf{Chernoff Bound}]
If $W$ is a binomial random variable with expectation $\mu$, and $0<\delta<1$, then, setting $\varphi(x)=(1+x)\log(1+x)-x$ for $x \geq -1$ (and $\varphi(x)=\infty$ for $x < -1$),
\begin{equation}\label{eq:chernoffstrong}
\pr [W < (1-\delta)\mu] \le \exp \left(-\mu \varphi(-\delta) \right) \le \exp \left( -\frac{\delta^2 \mu}{2} \right);
\end{equation}
and if $\delta > 0$,
\begin{equation}\label{eq:chernoffnormal}
\pr [ W > (1+\delta)\mu] \le \exp\left(-\frac{\delta^2 \mu}{2+\delta}\right).
\end{equation}
\end{lem}
\bigskip
Given $p = p_n \in[0,1)$, define ${\widehat p}=\log\frac{1}{1-p}$. Note that ${\widehat p} \ge p$ (with equality only holding at $p=0$), and
\begin{equation}\label{eq:hatp}
\begin{cases}
{\widehat p} \sim p
& \text{if $p=o(1)$,}
\\
{\widehat p} = \Theta(1)
& \text{if $p=\Theta(1)$ and $1-p=\Theta(1)$,}
\\
{\widehat p} \to \infty
& \text{if $p\to1$.}
\end{cases}
\end{equation}
We start with a few simple observations. Let us mention that some of the properties we show below are known and can be found in, for example,~\cite[Observation 2.1]{GLS} (but mainly for $p=o(1)$). We present the proof here for completeness and to prepare the reader for similar calculations later on.
\begin{lem}\label{lem:relations}
Assume $\log^2 n/\sqrt n \ll p \leq 1-\varepsilon$ for some constant $\varepsilon > 0$, and let $r$ be defined as in~\eqref{eq:rdef}. Then, the following holds:
\begin{enumerate}
\item[(i)]
\[
r = \left\lceil \frac1{\widehat p}\log\left(\frac{{\widehat p} n}{\log^2(pn)}(1+o(1))\right) \right\rceil =
\begin{cases}
\displaystyle \frac1{\widehat p}\log\left(\frac{{\widehat p} n}{\log^2(pn)}(1+o(1))\right)
& \text{if $p=o(1)$}
\\[1.2em]
\displaystyle \frac1{\widehat p}\log\left(\alpha \frac{{\widehat p} n}{\log^2(pn)} \right)
& \text{if $p=\Omega(1)$,}
\end{cases}
\]
for some $1+o(1) \le \alpha \le \frac{1+o(1)}{1-p}=\Theta(1)$.
\item[(ii)]
\[
r = \Theta\left(\frac{\log n}{p}\right)
\qquad\text{and}\qquad
(1-p)^r = \Theta\left(\frac{\log^2 n}{pn}\right).
\]
In particular, $r=\Omega(\log n)$ and $r=o(\sqrt n/\log n)$.
\item[(iii)] Moreover, if $k = r + O(1)$, then
$$
\frac{f(n,k+1,p)}{f(n,k,p)} = \exp(\Theta(\log^2 n)).
$$
\end{enumerate}
\end{lem}
\begin{proof}
For a given function $g=g_n =o(1)$, we define
$$
s_g = s_g(n,p) = \left\lceil \frac1{\widehat p}\log\left(\frac{{\widehat p} n}{\log^2(pn) (1+g_n)}\right) \right\rceil.
$$
First, observe that for $p$ in the range of discussion, $\log (pn) = \Theta(\log n)$. Then, it follows from~(\ref{eq:hatp}) that
\begin{equation}\label{eq:s_g}
s_g = \frac {1}{\Theta(p)} \Big( \Theta(\log (pn)) - O(\log \log (pn)) \Big) = \Theta \left( \frac {\log n}{p} \right).
\end{equation}
Also, from the definition of ${\widehat p}$ and~\eqref{eq:hatp}, we obtain $(1-p)^{s_g}= \Theta\left(\frac{\log^2 n}{pn}\right).$ Hence, part~(ii) will follow, once we show that $r=s_g$ for some function $g_n =o(1)$. In particular, proving part~(i) will automatically yield part~(ii).
Given any $g_n=o(1)$, define $g^-_n$ and $g^+_n$ by
\[
s_g = \frac1{\widehat p}\log\left(\frac{{\widehat p} n}{\log^2(pn) (1+g^-_n)}\right)
\qquad\text{and}\qquad
s_g - 1 = \frac1{\widehat p}\log\left(\frac{{\widehat p} n}{\log^2(pn) (1+g^+_n)}\right).
\]
Since $z\le \lceil z\rceil < z+1$ for any $z\in\ensuremath {\mathbb R} $, we obtain that $g^-_n \le g_n \le g^+_n.$
Now we proceed to estimate $f(n,s_g,p)$ and $f(n,s_g-1,p)$ for any $g_n=o(1)$.
Denoting by $[n]_k=n(n-1)\ldots(n-k+1)$, and using Stirling's formula ($k! \sim \sqrt{2\pi k}(k/e)^k$), we observe that
\begin{eqnarray*}
f(n,s_g,p) &=& \frac {[n]_{s_g}}{s_g!} \left( 1 - \frac {\log^2 (pn)}{{\widehat p} n} (1+ g^-_n ) \right)^{n(1-s_g/n)} \\
&=& \frac {n^{s_g} (1+O(s_g/n))^{s_g} }{(1+o(1)) \sqrt{2\pi s_g} (s_g/e)^{s_g}} \exp \left( - \frac {\log^2 (pn)}{{\widehat p}} \left( 1+ g^-_n + O \left(\frac {\log^2 n}{pn} \right) + O \left( \frac {s_g}{n} \right) \right) \right) \\
&=& \frac {1+o(1)}{\sqrt{2\pi s_g}} \exp \left( s_g \log \left( \frac {ne}{s_g} \right) - \frac {\log^2 (pn)}{{\widehat p}} \left( 1+ g^-_n + O \left(\frac {\log^2 n}{pn} \right) \right) \right),
\end{eqnarray*}
since $s_g = \Theta( \log n / p )$ (by~\eqref{eq:s_g}) and $p \gg \log^2 n / \sqrt{n}$, which implies that
$$
(1+O(s_g/n))^{s_g} = e^{O(s_g^2/n)} = e^{O(\log^2 n / (p^2 n))} \sim 1
$$
and $s_g/n = O(\log n / (pn)) = o(\log^2 n / (pn))$. Hence,
\begin{eqnarray}
f(n,s_g,p) &\sim& \frac {1}{\sqrt{2\pi s_g}} \exp \Bigg( \frac {\log (pn) + O(\log \log n)}{{\widehat p}} \left( \log \left( \frac {pn}{\log n} \right) + O(1) \right)
\notag\\
&& \hspace{9em}{ } - \frac {\log^2 (pn)}{{\widehat p}} \left( 1+ g^-_n + O \left(\frac {\log^2 n}{pn} \right) \right) \Bigg)
\notag\\
&=& \Theta \left( \sqrt{ \frac{p}{\log n} } \right) \exp \Bigg( - \frac {\log^2 (pn)}{{\widehat p}} \left( g^-_n + O \left(\frac {\log \log n}{\log n} \right) \right) \Bigg).
\label{eq:fnsgp}
\end{eqnarray}
Moreover, the same calculations leading to~\eqref{eq:fnsgp} are valid if we replace $s_g$ by $s_g-1$ and $g^-_n$ by $g^+_n$, so we also get
\begin{equation}
f(n,s_g-1,p) = \Theta \left( \sqrt{ \frac{p}{\log n} } \right) \exp \Bigg( - \frac {\log^2 (pn)}{{\widehat p}} \left( g^+_n + O \left(\frac {\log \log n}{\log n} \right) \right) \Bigg).
\label{eq:fnsgp2}
\end{equation}
In order to prove part~(ii), we first take $g_n = (\log \log n)^2 / \log n$. From~\eqref{eq:fnsgp2} and since $g^+_n \ge g_n$, we obtain
\[
f(n, s_g-1 ,p) \le \exp \left( - \Omega( (\log^2 \log n) \log(pn) ) \right) = o(1/(pn)),
\]
and thus
\[
f(n,j,p) < 1/(pn)
\qquad
\text{for all}\quad
1\le j\le s_g-1,
\]
since $f(n,j,p)$ is increasing with respect to $j$ in that range (this can be easily checked by looking at the ratio $f(n,j+1,p)/f(n,j,p)$ for $j = O(\log n/p) = o(\sqrt n)$).
Therefore, $r > s_g - 1$ and, since both $r$ and $s_g$ are natural numbers, $r \ge s_g = s_{(\log \log n)^2 / \log n}$.
On the other hand, if we set $g_n = -(\log \log n)^2 / \log n$ then, by~\eqref{eq:fnsgp} and since $g^-_n \le g_n$,
\[
f(n,s_g,p) \gg n^{-1/4} \sqrt{\log n} \cdot \exp \left( \Omega( (\log^2 \log n) \log(p n)) \right) > 1/(pn),
\]
and hence $r \le s_{- (\log \log n)^2 / \log n}$. Combining the two bounds, we conclude that
\[
r = s_g
\qquad\text{for some}\quad
-(\log \log n)^2 / \log n \le g_n \le (\log \log n)^2 / \log n,
\]
which implies the first equality in part~(i). The second equality follows immediately from setting $\alpha=1/(1+g^-_n)$ and the fact that $\frac{1}{1+g_n} \le \frac{1}{1+g^-_n} < \frac{1}{(1+g_n)(1-p)}$.
Finally, let us move to part (iii). Using part (ii), it is easy to see that for $k = r +O(1)$ we get
\begin{eqnarray*}
\frac{f(n,k+1,p)}{f(n,k,p)} & = & \frac {[n]_{k+1} / (k+1)!}{[n]_k / k!} \left( \frac { 1-(1-p)^{k+1} } { 1-(1-p)^{k} } \right)^{n-k} \left(1-(1-p)^{k+1}\right)^{-1} \\
&\sim& \frac {n}{k} \left( \frac { 1-(1-p)^{k} + p(1-p)^{k} } { 1-(1-p)^{k} } \right)^{n-k} \\
&=& \Theta \left( \frac{pn}{\log n} \right) \left( 1 + \Theta(p(1-p)^{k}) \right)^{n-k} \\
&=& \Theta \left( \frac{pn}{\log n} \right) \exp \left( \Theta(pn(1-p)^{k}) \right) \\
&=& \Theta \left( \frac{pn}{\log n} \right) \exp \left( \Theta( \log^2 n ) \right) = \exp \left( \Theta( \log^2 n ) \right).
\end{eqnarray*}
This finishes the proof of the lemma.
\end{proof}
Now, we will show that Theorem~\ref{thm:main_gnd} can be obtained from Theorem~\ref{thm:main_general}.
\begin{proof}[Proof of Theorem~\ref{thm:main_gnd}]
Let $k=k_n$ be such that $\varepsilon \log n \le k \le n^{1/3-\varepsilon}$ for some $\varepsilon > 0$. Our goal is to show that there exists $m = m_n \in \ensuremath {\mathbb N} $ such that a.a.s.\ $\gamma( {\mathcal{G}}(n,m) ) = k$ and $b( {\mathcal{G}}(n,m) ) = \Theta(\Delta( {\mathcal{G}}(n,m) )) = \Theta(m/n)$. We assume that Theorem~\ref{thm:main_general} holds and we will use the probability space $\sG(n,p)$ to get the result.
It follows immediately from definition~\eqref{eq:fdef} that, for $1\le j < n$, $f(n,j,p)$ is both a continuous and increasing function of $p$, taking all values between $0$ and $\binom{n}{j}$. Then, given $n\in\ensuremath {\mathbb N} $ (sufficiently large), we can define $p_+$ to be such that
\begin{equation}\label{eq:ppdef}
f(n,k-1,p_+) = 1/(p_+ n)
\end{equation}
Moreover, straightforward computations show that, for $0<p<1$ and $0\le j\le n/4$,
\begin{equation}\label{eq:easyratio}
\frac{f(n,j,p)}{f(n,j+1,p)} \le \frac{\binom{n}{j}}{\binom{n}{j+1}} = \frac{j+1}{n-j} < 1/2,
\end{equation}
so in particular $f(n,j,p)$ is increasing in $j$, for $j$ in that range. Let $r_+$ be defined as $r$ in~\eqref{eq:rdef} for $p=p_+$. From~\eqref{eq:ppdef} and~\eqref{eq:easyratio}, we deduce that $f(n,k,p_+) > 1/(p_+n)$ and $f(n,j,p_+) \le 1/(p_+n)$ for all $j\le k-1$, so we must have $r_+ = k$.
Also observe that $r$ in~\eqref{eq:rdef} is a non-increasing function of $p$. Combining this fact and Lemma~\ref{lem:relations}(i), we conclude that $n^{-1/3+\varepsilon'} \le p_+\le 1-\varepsilon'$, for some constant $\varepsilon'=\varepsilon'(\varepsilon)$, since otherwise $r_+<\varepsilon\log n$ or $r_+>n^{1/3-\varepsilon}$ contradicting our assumptions on $k$ and the fact that $k=r_+$. Hence, in particular, $1/ (p_+ n)=o(1)$. It follows immediately from the first moment method that a.a.s.\ $\sG(n,p_+)$ has no dominating set of size $k-1$,
and then
\begin{equation}\label{eq:Q1}
\text{for all }0\le p\le p_+, \qquad
\gamma(\sG(n,p)) \ge k
\quad\text{a.a.s.}
\end{equation}
since this is a non-increasing property with respect to the addition of edges.
In fact, a.a.s.\ $\gamma(\sG(n,p_+)) = k$ but we do not prove it now, since we will need a stronger statement to hold.
Now, let $\omega=\omega_n$ be a function tending to infinity sufficiently slowly in order to meet all requirements in the argument. Define
$$
p_- := p_+ - \frac {2\ \omega \sqrt{p_+} n}{{n \choose 2}} = p_+ \left(1 - \frac {2\ \omega n}{ \sqrt{p_+} {n \choose 2}}\right)=p_+(1+o(1)),
$$
where the last step follows from the fact that $p_+ \ge n^{-1/3+\varepsilon'}$. Since $p_- \sim p_+$, then $p_- \ge n^{-1/3+\varepsilon'/2}$ and $p_-$ is bounded away from 1. Clearly,
\begin{equation}\label{eq:fpmb}
f(n,k-1,p_-) \le f(n,k-1,p_+) = \frac {1}{p_+ n} < \frac {1}{p_- n}.
\end{equation}
Let $r_-$ be defined as $r$ in~\eqref{eq:rdef} for $p=p_-$. Next we want to show that $r_-=k$ and then that $f(n,k,p_-) \ge \exp(\omega \log n )$. First, using Lemma~\ref{lem:relations}(ii) and the fact that $k=r_+=\Theta(\log n/p_+)$, we get
\begin{align*}
1-\left(1-p_-\right)^{k-1} &= 1-\Big(1-p_{+} +\Theta \left( \frac {\omega \sqrt{p_+}}{n} \right) \Big)^{k-1} \\
&= 1- (1-p_{+})^{k-1} \left(1+\Theta\left(\tfrac{\omega \sqrt{p_+}}{n}\right)\right)^{k-1} \\
&= 1- (1-p_{+})^{k-1} \left(1+\Theta\left( \tfrac{\omega \log n }{n \sqrt{p_+}}\right)\right) \\
&= 1- (1-p_{+})^{k-1} - \Theta\left( \tfrac{\omega \log^3 n }{n^2 p_+^{3/2} }\right) \\
&= \left(1- (1-p_{+})^{k-1}\right) \left(1 - \Theta\left( \tfrac{\omega \log^3 n }{n^2 p_+^{3/2} }\right) \right).
\end{align*}
Hence,
\begin{align*}
f(n,k-1,p_-) &= f(n,k-1,p_+) \left(1 - \Theta\left( \tfrac{\omega \log^3 n }{n^2 p_+^{3/2} }\right) \right)^{n-k+1} \\
&= f(n,k-1,p_+) \left(1 - \Theta\left( \tfrac{\omega \log^3 n }{n p_+^{3/2} }\right) \right)\\
&\sim f(n,k-1,p_+) = (p_+ n)^{-1} \sim (p_- n)^{-1},
\end{align*}
as $p_+ \ge n^{-1/3+\varepsilon'}$. Combining this with~\eqref{eq:easyratio} and~\eqref{eq:fpmb}, we obtain that $f(n,k,p_-) > 1/(p_-n)$ and $f(n,j,p_-) \le 1/(p_-n)$ for all $j<k$, so $k=r_-$. Now, using Lemma~\ref{lem:relations} again (this time part (iii)), we get
$$
f(n,k,p_-) = f(n,k-1,p_-) \exp(\Theta(\log^2 n)) \sim (p_- n)^{-1} \exp(\Theta(\log^2 n)) \geq \exp(\omega \log n),
$$
as desired. The same argument holds clearly with $n-1$ playing the role of $n$. Therefore, it follows from Theorem~\ref{thm:main_general} that a.a.s.\ $\gamma({\mathcal{G}}(n,p_-)) = k$ and $b( \sG(n,p_-) ) = \Theta(\Delta( \sG(n,p_-) )) \ge c p_- n$, for some constant $c=c(\varepsilon)>0$. Let $Q$ be the graph property that we cannot destroy all dominating sets of size $k$ by removing any set of at most $cp_-n$ edges. Clearly, this is a non-decreasing property with respect to adding edges in the graph, so
\begin{equation}\label{eq:Q2}
\text{for all }p_-\le p\le 1, \qquad
\sG(n,p)\text{ satisfies property $Q$ a.a.s.}
\end{equation}
Finally, define
\[
\hat{m} = {n \choose 2} \frac {p_- + p_+}{2} = {n \choose 2} p_+ - \omega n \sqrt{p_+} \sim {n \choose 2} p_+,
\]
where at the last step we use the fact that $p_+>n^{-1/3+\varepsilon}$. Easy manipulations yield
\begin{equation}\label{eq:pplus}
p_+ = \frac{\hat{m} + \omega n \sqrt{p_+}}{\binom{n}{2}}
= \frac{\hat{m} + (\sqrt2+o(1))\omega \sqrt{ \hat m }}{\binom{n}{2}}
\ge \frac{\hat{m} + \omega \sqrt{ \hat m \left(\binom{n}{2}-\hat m \right)/\binom{n}{2} }}{\binom{n}{2}},
\end{equation}
and similarly
\begin{equation}\label{eq:pminus}
p_- = \frac{\hat{m} - \omega n \sqrt{p_+}}{\binom{n}{2}}
\le \frac{\hat{m} - \omega \sqrt{ \hat m \left(\binom{n}{2}-\hat m \right)/\binom{n}{2} }}{\binom{n}{2}}.
\end{equation}
In view of~\eqref{eq:Q1}, \eqref{eq:Q2}, \eqref{eq:pplus} and~\eqref{eq:pminus}, we can apply Proposition~1.13 in~\cite{JLR} separately to both the property $Q$ and the property that $\gamma({\mathcal{G}}(n,p)) \ge k$, and we conclude that a.a.s.\ $\gamma({\mathcal{G}}(n,\hat m)) \ge k$ and ${\mathcal{G}}(n,\hat m)$ satisfies property $Q$. These two events together imply that $\gamma({\mathcal{G}}(n,\hat{m})) = k$ and $b( {\mathcal{G}}(n,\hat{m}) ) = \Theta(p_-n) = \Theta(m/n)$. The proof is finished.
\end{proof}
\bigskip
Now, we are going to show that Theorem~\ref{thm:main_gnp} can be obtained from Theorem~\ref{thm:main_general}.
\begin{proof}[Proof of Theorem~\ref{thm:main_gnp}]
Let $p=p_n$ be such that $n^{-1/3+\varepsilon} \le p \le 1-\varepsilon$ for some $\varepsilon > 0$, and let $r=r_n$ be defined as in~\eqref{eq:rdef}. Moreover, suppose there exists a non-increasing non-negative sequence $h=h_n$ such that $p_{n+1}/p_n=1-\Theta(h_n/n)$. Our goal is to show that there exists a positive sequence $\omega=\omega_n\to\infty$ and a dense set $I'\subseteq\ensuremath {\mathbb N} $ such that
\[
f(n,r,p) \geq \exp(\omega \log n),
\qquad
\text{for $n\in I'$}.
\]
The result will follow immediately from Theorem~\ref{thm:main_general}, and will hold for $I$ defined as in~\eqref{eq:Iprime}. (Note that, since $I'$ is dense, it is straightforward to verify that $I$ must be dense too.)
Throughout the proof, we set $\omega=\omega_n=\log\log n$. Note $h_1 = O(1)$ and so our assumptions on $p$ and $h$ imply that $h_n = O(1)$ and so there exists a universal constant $0 < A_1 < 1$ such that, for every $n\le n'\le 3n$,
\begin{equation}\label{eq:ratiop}
A_1\le \frac{p_{n'}}{p_n} \le 1.
\end{equation}
Given any fixed $j\in\{0,1,2\}$, in view of our assumptions on $p$ and $h$ and by Lemma~\ref{lem:relations}(ii), we have
\begin{align*}
1-\left(1-p_n\right)^{r_{n+1}-j} &= 1-\Big(1-p_{n+1}\big(1+\Theta(h_n/n)\big)\Big)^{r_{n+1}-j}
\\
&= 1- (1-p_{n+1})^{r_{n+1}-j} \left(1-\Theta\left(\tfrac{p_{n+1} h_n}{n}\right)\right)^{r_{n+1}-j}
\\
&= 1- (1-p_{n+1})^{r_{n+1}-j} \left(1-\Theta\left( \tfrac{h_n\log n}{n}\right)\right)
\\
&= \left(1- (1-p_{n+1})^{r_{n+1}-j}\right) \left(1 + \Theta\left( \frac{h_n\log^3 n}{ n^2p_{n+1}}\right)\right).
\end{align*}
Therefore,
\begin{align}\label{fchange}
\frac{f(n+1,r_{n+1}-j,p_{n+1})}{f(n,r_{n+1}-j,p_n)} &=
\frac{n+1}{n+1-r_{n+1}+j}
\frac{\left(1-\left(1-p_{n+1}\right)^{r_{n+1}-j}\right)^{n-r_{n+1}+j+1}}
{\left(1-\left(1-p_n\right)^{r_{n+1}-j}\right)^{n-r_{n+1}+j}}
\nonumber \\
&=
\left(1 + \Theta\left(\frac{\log n}{np_n}\right)\right) \left(1-\left(1-p_{n+1}\right)^{r_{n+1}-j}\right)
\left(1 - \Theta\left( \frac{h_n\log^3 n}{ n^2p_{n+1}}\right)\right)^{n-r_{n+1}+j}
\nonumber \\
&=
\left(1 + \Theta\left(\frac{\log n}{np_n}\right)\right) \left(1- \Theta \left(\frac{\log^2 n}{np_{n+1}}\right)\right)
\left(1 - \Theta\left( \frac{h_n\log^3 n}{ n p_{n+1}}\right)\right)
\nonumber \\
&= 1-\Theta\left(\frac{g_n}{np_n}\right),
\end{align}
where $g_n:= \log^2 n + h_n \log^3 n$. By our assumptions on $h_n$, we have $\log^2 n \leq g_n = O(\log^3 n)$.
In particular, for every $j\in\{0,1,2\}$ and every $n$,
\begin{equation}\label{fchange2}
\exp\left(-C_2\frac{g_n}{np_n}\right) \le \frac{f(n+1,r_{n+1}-j,p_{n+1})}{f(n,r_{n+1}-j,p_n)} \le \exp\left(-C_1\frac{g_n}{np_n}\right),
\end{equation}
for some universal constants $C_2>C_1>0$. From~\eqref{fchange} (with $j=0$) and our assumptions on $p$, we obtain
\[
\frac{(n+1)p_{n+1} f(n+1,r_{n+1},p_{n+1})}{n p_{n} f(n,r_{n+1},p_{n})} = \left(1-\Theta\left(\frac{g_n}{np_n}\right)\right) \left(1+O \left( \frac 1n \right)\right) < 1,
\]
where the last inequality holds for $n$ sufficiently large. This implies that
\[
f(n,r_{n+1},p_{n}) > \frac{(n+1)p_{n+1} f(n+1,r_{n+1},p_{n+1})}{n p_{n} } > \frac{1}{n p_{n} },
\]
where the last inequality uses the definition of $r_{n+1}$ in~\eqref{eq:rdef}. Hence, $r_{n+1} \ge r_n$ for $n$ large enough, and thus $r$ is a nondecreasing sequence of $n$ except, possibly, for a finite number of terms.
Similarly, from~\eqref{fchange} (with $j=2$) and by Lemma~\ref{lem:relations}(iii),
\begin{eqnarray*}
f(n,r_{n+1}-2,p_{n}) &=& \left(1 +\Theta\left(\tfrac{g_n}{np_n}\right)\right) f(n+1,r_{n+1}-2,p_{n+1}) \\
&\sim& f(n+1,r_{n+1}-2,p_{n+1}) \\
&=& f(n+1,r_{n+1}-1,p_{n+1}) \exp\left(- \Theta(\log^2 n)\right) \\
&\le& \frac{1}{(n+1)p_{n+1}} \exp\left(- \Theta(\log^2 n)\right) < \frac{1}{np_n},
\end{eqnarray*}
for $n$ sufficiently large. Therefore, $r_{n+1}-2<r_n$, or equivalently $r_{n+1} \le r_n +1$, for all but finitely many $n$ (that is, $r$ can increase by at most one). We construct now the set $I'$ as follows:
$$
I' := \{n \in \ensuremath {\mathbb N} : f(n,r_n,p_{n}) \ge \exp(\omega_n \log n) \}.
$$
Since we want to show that $I'$ contains almost all $n \in \ensuremath {\mathbb N} $, suppose that $n_1\notin I'$ for some value $n_1\in\ensuremath {\mathbb N} $. Then we have
\[
1/(n_1p_{n_1}) < f(n_1,r_{n_1},p_{n_1}) < \exp(\omega_{n_1}\log n_1).
\]
Our goal is to show that $n_1$ is followed by an interval of naturals $[n_1,n_2-1]\notin I'$ and then by a much longer interval $[n_2,n_3]\in I'$. We may assume that $n_1$ is sufficiently large, since the limiting density of $I'$ is not affected by ignoring any finite number of naturals.
Let
\[
n_2 = \min\{n>n_1 : r_n>r_{n_1} \text{ or } n=3n_1\}.
\]
Since $r_n=r_{n_1}$ for all $n_1 \le n \le n_2-1$, applying~\eqref{fchange2} to that range (with $j=0$) we get
\begin{eqnarray*}
f(n_2-1,r_{n_2-1},p_{n_2-1}) &\le& f(n_1,r_{n_1},p_{n_1}) \exp\left(-C_1\sum_{n=n_1}^{n_2-2}\frac{g_n}{np_n}\right) \\
&<& \exp\left( \omega_{n_1}\log n_1- \frac {C_1}{3 n_1 p_{n_1}} \sum_{n=n_1}^{n_2-2} g_n \right) \\
&<& \exp\left( \omega_{n_1}\log n_1 + 1 - \frac {C_1}{3 n_1 p_{n_1}} \sum_{n=n_1}^{n_2-1} g_n \right).
\end{eqnarray*}
On the other hand, by the definition of $r$ (see~\eqref{eq:rdef}), we know that
\begin{equation}\label{eq:fn2minus1}
f(n_2-1,r_{n_2-1},p_{n_2-1}) > \frac {1}{p_{n_2-1}(n_2-1)} \ge \frac {1}{3 p_{n_1} n_1}.
\end{equation}
Hence, it must be the case that, say,
\begin{equation}\label{eq:n2-n1}
\sum_{n=n_1}^{n_2-1} g_n \le n_1 p_{n_1} \omega^{2}_{n_1}\log n_1.
\end{equation}
Since $g_n \ge \log^2 n$ and by our choice of $\omega_n$, it follows that
\begin{equation}\label{eq:n2n1}
n_2-n_1 \le n_1 \omega^{2}_{n_1} / \log n_1 < n_1.
\end{equation}
As a result, $n_2 \neq 3n_1$, and so it follows that $r_{n_2} > r_{n_1}$. In fact, since $r$ can increase by at most one, $r_{n_2} = r_{n_2-1} +1$. Now, we get from~\eqref{fchange2}, Lemma~\ref{lem:relations}(iii) and~\eqref{eq:fn2minus1} that, for some small constant $C_3>0$ (possibly depending on $\varepsilon$),
\begin{eqnarray}
f(n_2,r_{n_2},p_{n_2}) & \ge & C_3 f(n_2-1,r_{n_2},p_{n_2-1}) = C_3 f(n_2-1,r_{n_2-1}+1,p_{n_2-1})
\notag\\
& \ge & C_3 f(n_2-1,r_{n_2-1},p_{n_2-1}) \exp \left( C_3 \log^2 n_2 \right)
\notag\\
& \ge & \frac {C_3/3}{p_{n_1} n_1} \exp \left( C_3 \log^2 n_2 \right)
\notag\\
& \ge & \exp \left( (C_3/2) \log^2 n_2 \right) \ge \exp \left( \omega_{n_2} \log n_2 \right).
\label{eq:fn2}
\end{eqnarray}
As a result, $n_2$ belongs to $I'$.
Let
$$
n_3 = \min \{ n > n_2 : f(n,r_{n_2},p_n) < \exp(2\omega_{n_2}\log n_2) \text{ or } n = 3n_2\}.
$$
Note that if $f(n,r_{n_2},p_n) \ge \exp(2\omega_{n_2}\log n_2)$ for some $n_2 < n \le 3n_2$, then
$$
f(n,r_{n_2},p_n) \ge \exp(\omega_{n}\log n) > 1/(p_n n).
$$
Hence, $r_n = r_{n_2}$ and, more importantly, $n \in I'$. If $n_3 = 3n_2$, then we are done, since the interval $[n_2, n_3]$ is longer than $[n_1, n_2-1]$ by at least a $\log n_1/\omega^2_{n_1}$ factor (see second step in~\eqref{eq:n2n1}). Hence, we may assume that $f(n_3,r_{n_2},p_{n_3}) < \exp(2\omega_{n_2}\log n_2)$. Applying~\eqref{fchange2} one more time and by the second last step of~\eqref{eq:fn2}, we get
\begin{eqnarray*}
f(n_3,r_{n_2},p_{n_3}) &\ge& f(n_2,r_{n_2},p_{n_2}) \exp \left(-C_2\sum_{n=n_2}^{n_3-1}\frac{g_n}{np_n}\right) \\
&\ge& \exp\left( (C_3/2) \log^2 n_2 - \frac {C_2}{A_1 n_2 p_{n_2}} \sum_{n=n_2}^{n_3-1} g_n \right) \\
&\ge& \exp\left( (C_3/2) \log^2 n_2 - \frac {C_2}{A_1^2 n_1 p_{n_1}} \sum_{n=n_2}^{n_3-1} g_n \right),\end{eqnarray*}
which is at least $\exp(2\omega_{n_2}\log n_2)$, if, say, $\sum_{n=n_2}^{n_3-1} g_n \le n_1 p_{n_1} \log^2 n_1 / \omega_{n_1}.$ Consequently,
\begin{equation}\label{eq:n-n2}
\sum_{n=n_2}^{n_3-1} g_n > \frac {n_1 p_{n_1} \log^2 n_1} { \omega_{n_1} }.
\end{equation}
Finally, note that $h_n$ is non-increasing and $n_3-n_1 \le 8n_1$, so $g_n \sim g_{n_1}$ for any $n_1 \le n \le n_3$ and, as a result,
$$
\max\{g_n : n_2 \le n \le n_3 - 1\}< C \cdot \min\{g_n : n_1 \le n \le n_2 -1\}
$$
for some universal constant $C$. Combining this observation together with~\eqref{eq:n2-n1} and~\eqref{eq:n-n2}, it immediately follows that
$$
\frac {n_2 - n_1}{n_3-n_2+1} \le \frac{\omega_{n_1}^{3}}{\log n_1}.
$$
Putting everything together, given any $n_1\notin I'$ sufficiently large, we obtained $n_2$ and $n_3$ such that
\[
[n_2,n_3]\subseteq I'
\qquad\text{and}\qquad
n_3-n_2 + 1\ge \frac{\log n_1}{\omega_{n_1}^{3}} (n_2-n_1).
\]
This proves that $I'$ is dense as required, and the proof of the theorem is finished.
\end{proof}
\bigskip
Note that the lengths of the intervals $[n_1,n_2-1]$ and $[n_2,n_3]$ in the proof of Theorem~\ref{thm:main_gnp} depend on the value of $p_n$. This is not an artifact of the proof, but rather reflecting the fact that for different values of $p_n$ these lengths are indeed different: for $p_n=n^{-1/4}$, we get that $r_{2n}-r_n=\Theta(n^{1/4}\log n)$, and thus, on average, after $\Theta(\frac{np}{\log n})$ integers the value of $r$ increases by $1$. On the other hand, for $p_n=\frac{1}{\log \log n}$, we get that $r_{2n}-r_n=\Theta(\log \log n)$, and thus, on average, after $\Theta(np)$ integers the value of $r$ increases by $1$.
\section{Second moment ingredients}\label{sec:second}
For a given function $p=p_n$, let $f(n,k,p)$ and $r=r_n$ be defined as in~\eqref{eq:fdef} and~\eqref{eq:rdef}, respectively. Throughout this section, we suppose that, given our choice of $p$, there exists some infinite set $I' \subseteq\ensuremath {\mathbb N} $ satisfying~\eqref{eq:condI} for a given function $\omega = \omega_n \to\infty$, and restrict all our asymptotic statements to $n\in I'$. For simplicity, we also write $X$ instead of $X_r$ and $\cD$ instead of $\cD_r$. For each $i\in\{0,1,\ldots,r\}$, let $W_i$ be the random variable counting the number of ordered pairs $D,D'\in\cD$ in $\sG(n,p)$ with $|D\cap D'|=i$. One of the key ingredients in our analysis is to estimate the variance of $X$ and other related random variables defined later in the paper. To do so, we will use several bounds on $\ex W_i$ that are stated in~Proposition~\ref{prop:variancekey} below. In fact, the variance of $X_{r+1}$ was already studied in~\cite{GLS} and~\cite{WG}, and we follow some of the ideas in their computations, but we need a more accurate estimation of the error terms involved. Also, the aforementioned papers deal with $X_{r+1}$ instead of $X_r$, since they make use of the fact that $\ex X_{r+1}=\exp(\Theta(\log^2n))$. In our case, this fact is replaced by our assumption~\eqref{eq:condI}.
The following lemma uses some of the computations in~\cite{GLS}, and will prepare us for~Proposition~\ref{prop:variancekey}. Given two sets of vertices $D,D'$ of size $r$ with $|D \cap D'|=i$, let $P_i$ denote the probability that $D,D'$ dominate each other in $\sG(n,p)$ (i.e.,~every vertex in $D$ has a neighbour in $D'$ and vice versa).
\begin{lem}\label{lem:large_range}
Given a constant $\epsilon>0$, suppose that $\log^2 n / \sqrt{n} \ll p \leq 1-\varepsilon$ and condition~\eqref{eq:condI} holds for some infinite set $I'\subseteq\ensuremath {\mathbb N} $ and some function $\omega =\omega_n \to\infty$, where $f(n,k,p)$ and $r$ are defined as in~\eqref{eq:fdef} and~\eqref{eq:rdef}. Then, for each $0.9r\le i\le r$,
\[
\frac{r\ex W_i/P_i}{\ex W_1/P_1} \le \exp\left(-(\omega/2 )\log n \right) \qquad\text{(for $n\in I'$)}.
\]
\end{lem}
\begin{proof}[Sketch of proof]
We follow some of the computations in Section~3.1 of~\cite{GLS}. In that paper, their choice of $r$ corresponds to our $r+1$, and their calculations assume $p=o(1)$, but everything we use here remains valid in our setting.
First, note that
\begin{equation}\label{eq:EWi}
\ex W_i = \frac{n!}{i!(r-i)!^2(n-2r+i)!} \left( 1-(1-p)^i + (1-p)^i(1-(1-p)^{r-i})^2 \right)^{n-2r+i}P_i.
\end{equation}
Observe that $\ex W_i/P_i$ corresponds exactly to $f(i)$ in~\cite{GLS}. By adapting~(3.8) in~\cite{GLS} to our notation and using our assumption~\eqref{eq:condI}, we get
\begin{align*}
\frac{r\ex W_i/P_i}{\ex W_1/P_1} &\le \frac{(1+o(1))}{\ex X} \frac{n}{r} \binom{r}{i}\binom{n-r}{r-i}
\left(1+\frac{(1-p)^r\left(1-(1-p)^{r-i}\right)}{1-2(1-p)^r+(1-p)^{2r-i}}\right)^{-(n-r)}
\\
&\le \exp\left( - \omega \log n + \log n + 2(r-i)\log n - n
(1-p)^r\left(1-(1-p)^{r-i}\right)(1+o(1)) \right).
\end{align*}
(The term $-\omega \log n$ in the exponent above corresponds to $-(1+o(1))\log^2(pn)$ in~\cite{GLS}, because of their different choice of $r$.)
Moreover, (3.9) in~\cite{GLS} gives that
\[
2(r-i)\log n - \frac{n}{2} (1-p)^r\left(1-(1-p)^{r-i}\right) \le 0,
\]
and therefore
\[
\frac{r\ex W_i/P_i}{\ex W_1/P_1} \le \exp\left( - \omega \log n + \log n \right) \le \exp\left( - (\omega/2) \log n \right).\qedhere
\]
\end{proof}
\bigskip
Before we proceed, we need one more definition. Given a constant $\varepsilon>0$ and for $i\in\{1, 2, \ldots,r\}$, let
\begin{equation}\label{eq:Qidef}
Q_i = \sum_{j=0}^{\min\{i-1,L-1\}} \pr(\Bin(i-1,p)=j) (\pr(\Bin(r-i,p)<L-j))^2,
\end{equation}
where $L = \lfloor \varrho p r \rfloor$ with $\varrho=\varepsilon^2$. The following proposition will be central for estimating the variance of several random variables.
\begin{prop}\label{prop:variancekey}
Given a constant $\varepsilon > 0$, assume that $\log^2 n / \sqrt{n} \ll p \leq 1-\varepsilon$ and condition~\eqref{eq:condI} is satisfied for some infinite set $I'\subseteq\ensuremath {\mathbb N} $. Then, the following holds for $\sG(n,p)$ with $n$ restricted to $I'$:
\begin{itemize}
\item[(i)]
\[
\frac{\ex W_0}{(\ex X)^2} \le 1 + \Theta\left(\frac{\log^3n}{p^2n}\right)
\qquad\text{and}\qquad
\frac{\ex W_1}{(\ex X)^2} \le \frac{r^2}{n} \left( 1 + \Theta\left(\frac{\log^4n}{pn} + \frac{\log^3n}{p^2n}\right) \right);
\]
\item[(ii)]
$$
\sum_{i=1}^r i\ex W_i \le \frac{r^2}{n} \left( 1 + \Theta\left(\frac{\log^4n}{pn} + \frac{\log^3n}{p^2n}\right) \right) (\ex X)^2;
$$
\item[(iii)]
\[
\sum_{i=1}^r i Q_i \ex W_i \le Q_1\frac{r^2}{n}\left( 1 + \Theta\left(\frac{\log^4n}{pn} + \frac{\log^3n}{p^2n}\right) \right) (\ex X)^2.
\]
\end{itemize}
\end{prop}
\begin{proof}
Denoting by $P_i$ is, as above, the probability that $D,D'$ with intersection of size $i$ dominate each other, note first that from~\eqref{eq:EWi} we obtain in particular,
\begin{equation}\label{eq:EW0}
\ex W_0 = \frac{n!}{r!^2(n-2r)!} \left(1-(1-p)^{r}\right)^{2(n-2r)}P_0,
\end{equation}
and
\begin{equation}\label{eq:EW1}
\ex W_1 = \frac{n!}{(r-1)!^2(n-2r+1)!} \left( p + (1-p)(1-(1-p)^{r-1})^2 \right)^{n-2r+1}P_1.
\end{equation}
Also, recall that
\begin{equation}\label{eq:EX2}
(\ex X)^2 = f(n,r,p)^2 = \left(\frac{n!}{r!(n-r)!} \left(1-(1-p)^{r}\right)^{n-r}\right)^2.
\end{equation}
Using~\eqref{eq:EW0}, \eqref{eq:EX2} and Lemma~\ref{lem:relations}(ii), we can easily bound the ratio
\[
\frac{\ex W_0}{(\ex X)^2} = \frac{[n-r]_r}{[n]_r} \big(1-(1-p)^{r}\big)^{-2r}P_0
\le
\big(1-(1-p)^{r}\big)^{-2r}
= 1 + \Theta(r(1-p)^{r})
= 1 + \Theta\left(\frac{\log^3n}{p^2n}\right).
\]
Moreover, from~\eqref{eq:EW1}, \eqref{eq:EX2},
Lemma~\ref{lem:relations}(ii) and the fact that $p \gg \log^2n/\sqrt n$,
\begin{align*}
\frac{\ex W_1}{(\ex X)^2} &= \frac{r^2[n-r]_{r-1}}{[n]_r} \frac{\left( p + (1-p)(1-(1-p)^{r-1})^2 \right)^{n-2r+1}} { \left( \left(1-(1-p)^{r}\right)^{n-r}\right)^2} P_1
\\
&= \frac{r^2[n-r]_{r-1}}{[n]_r} \frac{\left( 1 - 2(1-p)^{r} + (1-p)^{2r-1} \right)^{n-2r+1}} { \left( \left(1-(1-p)^{r}\right)^{n-r}\right)^2} P_1
\\
&= \frac{r^2[n-r]_{r-1}}{[n]_r} \left( 1 + \frac{ (1-p)^{2r-1} - (1-p)^{2r} )} {\left(1-(1-p)^{r}\right)^2}\right)^{n-r} \left( 1 - 2(1-p)^{r} + (1-p)^{2r-1} \right)^{-r+1} P_1
\\
&= \frac{r^2[n-r]_{r-1}}{n[n-1]_{r-1}} \left( 1 + \frac{ p(1-p)^{2r-1}} {\left(1-(1-p)^{r}\right)^2}\right)^{n-r} \left( 1 - 2(1-p)^{r} + (1-p)^{2r-1} \right)^{-r+1} P_1
\\
&= \frac{r^2}{n} \left(1 - \Theta\left(\frac{r^2}{n}\right)\right) \left(1 + \Theta\left(pn(1-p)^{2r}\right)\right) \left( 1 + \Theta\left(r(1-p)^{r}\right) \right) P_1
\\
&= \frac{r^2}{n} \left(1 - \Theta\left(\frac{\log^2n}{p^2n}\right)\right) \left(1 + \Theta\left(\frac{\log^4n}{pn}\right)\right) \left( 1 + \Theta\left(\frac{\log^3n}{p^2n}\right) \right) P_1
\\
&\le \frac{r^2}{n} \left( 1 + \Theta\left(\frac{\log^4n}{pn} + \frac{\log^3n}{p^2n}\right) \right).
\end{align*}
This proves part~(i). Note that, in fact, we get something slightly stronger, namely
\begin{equation}\label{eq:stronger}
\frac{\ex W_1/P_1}{(\ex X)^2} \le \frac{r^2}{n} \left( 1 + \Theta\left(\frac{\log^4n}{pn} + \frac{\log^3n}{p^2n}\right) \right).
\end{equation}
For $i$ not too close to $r$, say $1\le i\le r-3\log\log n/p$, we have
\begin{align}
\frac{\ex W_{i+1}/P_{i+1}}{\ex W_i/P_i} &= \frac{(r-i)^2}{(i+1)(n-2r+i+1)} \frac{\left( 1-(1-p)^{i+1} + (1-p)^{i+1}(1-(1-p)^{r-i-1})^2 \right)^{n-2r+i+1}}{\left( 1-(1-p)^i + (1-p)^i(1-(1-p)^{r-i})^2 \right)^{n-2r+i}}
\notag\\
&= \frac{(r-i)^2}{(i+1)(n-2r+i+1)} \left(\frac{ 1 - 2(1-p)^r+(1-p)^{2r-i-1} }{ 1 - 2(1-p)^{r} + (1-p)^{2r-i} }\right)^{n-2r+i} \left( 1 - 2(1-p)^r+(1-p)^{2r-i-1} \right)
\notag\\
&= \frac{(r-i)^2}{(i+1)(n-2r+i+1)} \left(1+\frac{p(1-p)^{2r-i-1}}{ 1 - 2(1-p)^{r} + (1-p)^{2r-i} }\right)^{n-2r+i} \left( 1 - 2(1-p)^r+(1-p)^{2r-i-1} \right)
\notag\\
&\le \frac{r^2}{n-2r} \left(1+O\left(pn(1-p)^{r+3\log\log n/p}\right)\right) \left( 1 - \Theta\left((1-p)^r\right) \right)
\notag\\
&\le \frac{r^2}{n-2r} \left(1+O\left(e^{-3\log\log n}\log^{2}n\right)\right) \left( 1 - \Theta\left(\frac{\log^2n}{pn}\right) \right)
\notag\\
&= \frac{r^2}{n}(1+o(1)) = O(\log^2 n/(p^2 n)).
\label{eq:ratioEWi}
\end{align}
On the other hand, consider now $r-3\log\log n/p \le i \le r$. Since this range is eventually included in the range $0.9r \le i \le r$ then, by Lemma~\ref{lem:large_range},
\begin{equation}\label{eq:germans_eq}
\frac{r\ex W_i/P_i}{\ex W_1/P_1} \le \exp\left(- (\omega/2) \log n \right).
\end{equation}
Now, note that for $i \geq 1$ we have
$$
\frac{(i+1)\ex W_{i+1}/P_{i+1}}{i \ex W_i/P_i} \leq 2\frac{\ex W_{i+1}/P_{i+1}}{\ex W_i/P_i}.
$$
Combining this with~\eqref{eq:stronger}, \eqref{eq:ratioEWi} and~\eqref{eq:germans_eq},
\begin{align*}
\sum_{i=1}^r i \ex W_i &\leq \sum_{i=1}^r i\ex W_i/P_i = \frac{ \ex W_1}{P_1} \left(1+O\left(\frac{\log^2 n}{p^2 n}\right)\right) + \frac{\ex W_1}{P_1} O\left(\log \log n/p\right)\exp\left( - (\omega/2) \log n \right) \\
&= \frac{\ex W_1}{P_1} \left(1+O\left( \frac{\log^2 n}{p^2n} \right)\right) \\
&\leq (\ex X)^2\frac{r^2}{n} \left( 1 + \Theta\left(\frac{\log^4n}{pn} + \frac{\log^3n}{p^2n}\right)\right)\left(1+O\left( \frac{\log^2 n}{p^2n}\right)\right) \\
&= (\ex X)^2\frac{r^2}{n} \left( 1 + \Theta\left(\frac{\log^4n}{pn} + \frac{\log^3n}{p^2n}\right)\right),
\end{align*}
and part (ii) follows.
For part (iii), observe first that there exists some $C =C(\varepsilon) > 0$ such that if $i \ge C \log n$, then $i > 2L$. Hence, for $C \log n \leq i \leq r-3\log\log n/p$, substituting $B_{a,b}$ for $\pr(\Bin(a,p)=b)$, we get
\begin{eqnarray*}
\frac{(i+1)Q_{i+1}}{iQ_i} &=& \frac{(i+1)\sum_{j=0}^{L-1} \pr(\Bin(i,p)=j) (\pr(\Bin(r-i-1,p)<L-j))^2}{i\sum_{j=0}^{L-1} \pr(\Bin(i-1,p)=j) (\pr(\Bin(r-i,p)<L-j))^2} \\
&=& \frac{(i+1) \sum_{j=0}^{L-1}\sum_{k=0}^{L-j-1}\sum_{k'=0}^{L-j-1} \frac{i}{i-j} \frac{r-i-k}{r-i} \frac{r-i-k'}{r-i} \frac{1}{1-p} B_{i-1,j} B_{r-i,k} B_{r-i,k'}} {i\sum_{j=0}^{L-1} \sum_{k=0}^{L-j-1}\sum_{k'=0}^{L-j-1} B_{i-1,j} B_{r-i,k} B_{r-i,k'} } \\
&\le& \frac {i+1}{i} \frac {i}{i-L+1} \frac {1}{1-p} = O(1).
\end{eqnarray*}
Similarly, for $L \le i < C \log n$ we have
$$
\frac{(i+1)Q_{i+1}}{iQ_i}= O(\log n).
$$
On the other hand, for $1 \leq i \leq L-1$,
\begin{eqnarray*}
\frac{(i+1)Q_{i+1}}{iQ_i} &=& \frac{(i+1) \sum_{j=0}^{i-1}\sum_{k=0}^{L-j-1}\sum_{k'=0}^{L-j-1} \frac{i}{i-j}\frac{r-i-k}{r-i} \frac{r-i-k'}{r-i} \frac{1}{1-p}B_{i-1,j} B_{r-i,k} B_{r-i,k'}} {i\sum_{j=0}^{i-1} \sum_{k=0}^{L-j-1}\sum_{k'=0}^{L-j-1} B_{i-1,j} B_{r-i,k} B_{r-i,k'} } \\
&& +\frac{(i+1)p^i \sum_{k=0}^{L-i-1}\sum_{k'=0}^{L-i-1} B_{r-i-1,k} B_{r-i-1,k'} } {i\sum_{j=0}^{i-1} \sum_{k=0}^{L-j-1}\sum_{k'=0}^{L-j-1} B_{i-1,j} B_{r-i,k} B_{r-i,k'} }\\
&=& O(\log n)+\frac{(i+1)p^i (\frac{1}{1-p})^2\sum_{k=0}^{L-i-1}\sum_{k'=0}^{L-i-1} B_{r-i,k} B_{r-i,k'} } {ip^{i-1} \sum_{k=0}^{L-i}\sum_{k'=0}^{L-i} B_{r-i,k} B_{r-i,k'} } \\
&=& O(\log n).
\end{eqnarray*}
Finally, for $r-3\log\log n/p \leq i \leq r$, by Lemma~\ref{lem:large_range}, since $Q_i \leq 1$, and by Chernoff's bound (see~\eqref{eq:chernoffstrong}),
\begin{eqnarray*}
\frac{r Q_i \ex W_i/P_i}{Q_1 \ex W_1/P_1} &\le & \frac{ Q_i}{Q_1} \exp\left(- (\omega/2)\log n \right) \\
& \leq &\frac{1}{(\pr(\Bin(r-1,p) < L))^2}\exp\left(- (\omega/2)\log n \right) \\
& \leq & \exp\left(((1-\varrho)^2pr/2)- (\omega/2)\log n \right) \\
& \leq & \exp\left(O(\log n)- (\omega/2)\log n \right) \le \exp\left(- (\omega/3)\log n \right),
\end{eqnarray*}
where the last inequality follows from $p \gg \log^2 n/\sqrt{n}$. Combining all bounds,
\begin{eqnarray*}
\sum_{i=1}^r i Q_i \ex W_i &\leq& \sum_{i=1}^r i Q_i \ex W_i/P_i = \frac{ \ex W_1 Q_1}{P_1} \left(1+O\left(\frac{\log^3 n}{p^2 n}\right)\right) \\
&=& Q_1(\ex X)^2\frac{r^2}{n} \left( 1 + O\left(\frac{\log^3n}{p^2n}\right)+O\left(\frac{\log^4n}{pn}\right)\right),
\end{eqnarray*}
and (iii) follows. The proof of the proposition is finished.
\end{proof}
As an immediate consequence of this proposition, we can bound the variance of $X=X_r$ (which is also done for $X_{r+1}$ in~\cite{GLS} and~\cite{WG}), and obtain the following result.
\begin{cor}\label{cor:small_variance}
Given a constant $\varepsilon>0$, assume that $\log^2n/\sqrt n \ll p \le 1-\varepsilon$ and condition~\eqref{eq:condI} is satisfied for some infinite set $I'\subseteq\ensuremath {\mathbb N} $. Then a.a.s.\ $X \sim f(n,r,p)$ (for $n\in I'$). Consequently, a.a.s.\ $\gamma(\sG(n,p))=r$ (for $n\in I'$).
\end{cor}
\begin{proof}
From Proposition~\ref{prop:variancekey}~(i) and~(ii), we get
\[
\ex W_0 \le (1+o(1)) (\ex X)^2
\qquad\text{and}\qquad
\sum_{i=1}^r \ex W_i \le \sum_{i=1}^r i\ex W_i \le O(r^2/n) (\ex X)^2 = o (\ex X)^2,
\]
where we used that $r^2/n=o(1)$ by Lemma~\ref{lem:relations}(ii). Therefore,
\[
\var X = \ex(X^2) - (\ex X)^2 = \sum_{i=0}^r \ex W_i - (\ex X)^2 = o(\ex X)^2,
\]
and thus, by Chebyshev's inequality, we conclude that $X \sim \ex X = f(n,r,p)\to\infty$ a.a.s.\ for $n \in I'$. The second claim in the statement follows immediately from the fact that $\ex X_{r-1}=f(n,r-1,p)=o(1)$ (from the definition of $r$ in~\eqref{eq:rdef}).
\end{proof}
\bigskip
Before we state the next lemma, we need one more definition. For a given vertex $v$, let $Z_v$ be the random variable counting the number of dominating sets of size $r$ containing vertex $v$. We will use Proposition~\ref{prop:variancekey} to prove the following observation.
\begin{lem}\label{lem:vertex}
Given a constant $\varepsilon > 0$, assume that $\log^2 n / \sqrt{n} \ll p \leq 1-\varepsilon$ and condition~\eqref{eq:condI} is satisfied for some infinite set $I'\subseteq\ensuremath {\mathbb N} $. Then, the following holds for $\sG(n,p)$ and any vertex $v \in [n]$:
$$
\ex Z_v = \frac{r}{n} \ \ex X \qquad \text{and} \quad \text{(for $n\in I'$)} \qquad \var Z_v = \Theta\left(\frac{\log^4n}{pn} + \frac{\log^3n}{p^2n}\right) (\ex Z_v)^2.
$$
\end{lem}
\begin{proof}
First note that
\[
\sum_{v\in[n]} Z_v = r X,
\]
as both sides count dominating sets in $\cD$ with one vertex marked. So $\ex Z_v = \frac{r}{n} \ex X$ by linearity of expectation and since all $Z_v$ have the same distribution, and the first part holds. Similarly,
\[
\sum_{v\in[n]} {Z_v}^2 = \sum_{i=1}^r i W_i,
\]
since both sides count pairs of dominating sets $D,D'\in\cD$ with one marked vertex in the intersection. Therefore,
\[
\ex({Z_v}^2) = \frac1n \sum_{i=1}^r i \ex W_i \le \frac{r^2}{n^2} \left( 1 + h \right) (\ex X)^2 = \left( 1 + h \right) (\ex Z_v)^2,
\]
for some $h =\Theta(\frac{\log^4n}{pn} + \frac{\log^3n}{p^2n})$, by Proposition~\ref{prop:variancekey}. The bound on the variance in the statement follows immediately, and the proof of the lemma is finished.
\end{proof}
\section{Proof of Theorem~\ref{thm:main_general}}\label{sec:theorem}
In order to prove our main result, we first analyze the effect that removing one edge has on the number of dominating sets of smallest size. Given $p=p_n$, recall the definitions of $f(n,k,p)$ and $r$ in~\eqref{eq:fdef} and~\eqref{eq:rdef}. Also recall $X=X_r$ and $\cD=\cD_r$. Let $G=(V,E)$ be a random outcome of $\sG(n,p)$. Throughout this section, a {\bf pair} $uv$ always refers to a pair of different vertices $u,v\in V$ (a pair $uv$ may or may not be an edge in $E$). Similarly, a {\bf directed pair} $\overrightarrow{uv}$ refers to the corresponding ordered pair of vertices (so $uv=vu$ but $\overrightarrow{uv}\ne\overrightarrow{vu}$). Given a pair $uv$, let $\widehat\cD_{uv}$ be the set of dominating sets of size $r$ of the graph $G+uv = (V,E\cup\{uv\})$. Given a directed pair $\overrightarrow{uv}$ and $j \in [r]$, let
\[
\widehat\cD_{j,\overrightarrow{uv}}
= \big\{D\in\widehat\cD_{uv} : v\in D,u\notin D, |\widehat N(u)\cap D|=j\big\},
\]
where $\widehat N(u)$ denotes the set of vertices adjacent to $u$ in $G+uv$.
Define the \textbf{damage} of $\overrightarrow{uv}$ to be
\[
Z_{\overrightarrow{uv}} = \sum_{j=1}^r \frac{| \widehat \cD_{j,\overrightarrow{uv}} |}{j},
\]
and the \textbf{damage} of the corresponding pair $uv$ to be $Z_{uv}=Z_{\overrightarrow{uv}}+Z_{\overrightarrow{vu}}$. Finally, the \textbf{damage} of a set of pairs $A$ is $Z_A=\sum_{e\in A}Z_e$. We will see that this notion constitutes a convenient upper bound on the number of dominating sets of size $r$ destroyed by removing a set of pairs $A$ from the edge set. Let $Y_A$ be the number of dominating sets in $\cD$ that are not dominating anymore after deleting a set of pairs $A$ from $E$, that is, the number of dominating sets of size $r$ of $G$ but not of $G-A = (V, E\setminus A)$. (Note that the definitions of $Z_A$ and $Y_A$ do not require $A\subseteq E$, but in the next observation we do.)
\begin{obs}\label{obs:Y}
Assuming $\gamma(G)=r$, clearly, one strategy to prove a lower bound $b(G)>a$ is to show that $Y_A < X$ for all sets of edges $A\subseteq E$ of size $a$, so the removal of any $a$ edges of $G$ cannot destroy all dominating sets of minimal size.
Unfortunately, $Y_A$ is not easy to compute, since in general $Y_A \ne \sum_{e\in A}Y_e$.
Hence, our notion of damage turns useful in view of the following deterministic result.
\end{obs}
\begin{lem}\label{lem:YZ}
For every set $A$ of pairs (not necessarily $A\subseteq E$), $Y_A\le Z_A$.
\end{lem}
\begin{proof}
The proof is straightforward. Let $D \in \cD$ be a dominating set of $G$ of size $r$ contributing to $Y_A$. Since $D$ fails to dominate the rest of the graph $G-A$, there must be some vertex $u\notin D$ (but, of course, adjacent to some vertex in $D$) such that all $|N(u)\cap D|$ edges connecting $u$ and $D$ in $G$ belong to $A$ (and thus are removed). Each of the corresponding directed pairs $\overrightarrow{uv}$ (for $v\in N(u)\cap D$) contributes $1/|N(u)\cap D|$ to the total damage.
\end{proof}
In order to bound $Y_A$, by the previous lemma, it suffices to estimate $Z_{uv}=Z_{\overrightarrow{uv}}+Z_{\overrightarrow{vu}}$ and sum over all pairs $uv$ in $A$.
It is convenient for our analysis to split the damage $Z_{\overrightarrow{uv}}$ of a directed pair $\overrightarrow{uv}$ into its {\bf light damage}
\[
Z'_{\overrightarrow{uv}} = \sum_{j=L+1}^{r} \frac{| \widehat\cD_{j,\overrightarrow{uv}} |}{j},
\]
and its {\bf heavy damage}
\[
Z''_{\overrightarrow{uv}} = Z_{\overrightarrow{uv}} - Z'_{\overrightarrow{uv}} = \sum_{j=1}^{L} \frac{| \widehat\cD_{j,\overrightarrow{uv}} |}{j}.
\]
(Recall that $L = \lfloor \varrho p r \rfloor$ with $\varrho=\varepsilon^2.$) Similarly as before, the {\bf light damage} of a pair $uv$ is $Z'_{uv}=Z'_{\overrightarrow{uv}}+Z'_{\overrightarrow{vu}}$, and its {\bf heavy damage} is $Z^{''}_{uv}=Z^{''}_{\overrightarrow{uv}}+Z^{''}_{\overrightarrow{vu}}$. For a given set of pairs $A$, its \textbf{light damage} is $Z'_A=\sum_{e \in A} Z'_e$ and its \textbf{heavy damage} is $Z^{''}_A=\sum_{e \in A} Z^{''}_e$.
We will now estimate the first and second moments of some of the random variables described above. Given any $\overrightarrow{uv}$, we can easily estimate $\ex Z_{\overrightarrow{uv}}$ by summing the probability that a given $D\in\widehat\cD_{j,\overrightarrow{uv}}$ appears in $G+uv$, weighted by $1/j$, over all possible choices of $D$.
\begin{align}
\ex Z_{\overrightarrow{uv}} &= \sum_{j=1}^r \frac{1}{j} \binom{n-2}{r-1} \Big(1-(1-p)^r\Big)^{n-r-1}\binom{r-1}{j-1}p^{j-1}(1-p)^{r-j}
\nonumber \\
&= \frac{r(n-r)}{n(n-1)} \Big(1-(1-p)^r\Big)^{-1} \ex X \sum_{j=1}^r \frac{1}{pr} \binom{r}{j}p^j(1-p)^{r-j}
\label{eq:zuv} \\
&= \frac{(n-r)}{pn(n-1)} \ex X \sim \frac{\ex X}{pn}.
\nonumber
\end{align}
For $Z''_{\overrightarrow{uv}}$ we get better bounds:
\begin{lem}\label{lem:exp_zuv}
Given any constant $\varepsilon > 0$ sufficiently small, assume that $\log^2/\sqrt n \ll p \le 1-\varepsilon$. Then, for $n$ sufficiently large and for any $\overrightarrow{uv}$,
\begin{equation*}
\ex Z''_{\overrightarrow{uv}}
\le
\begin{cases}
\dfrac{\ex X}{(pn)^{2-\varepsilon/2}},
& \text{if } p=o(1),
\\\\
\dfrac{\ex X}{(pn)^{1+\varepsilon^2}},
& p=\Theta(1) \mbox{ and } p \le 1-\varepsilon.
\end{cases}
\end{equation*}
\end{lem}
\begin{proof}
Arguing as in~\eqref{eq:zuv} and by Lemma~\ref{lem:relations}(ii), we have
\begin{align*}
\ex Z''_{\overrightarrow{uv}} &= \frac{r(n-r)}{n(n-1)} \Big(1-(1-p)^r\Big)^{-1} \ex X \sum_{j=1}^{L} \frac{1}{pr} \binom{r}{j}p^j(1-p)^{r-j}
\\
& = \frac{(n-r)}{pn(n-1)} \ex X \frac{ \pr (1 \le \Bin(r,p) \le L) }{1-(1-p)^r}
\\
& \leq \frac{ 1+o(1) }{pn} \ex X \; \pr (\Bin(r,p) \leq L).
\end{align*}
By the stronger version of Chernoff's bound given in~\eqref{eq:chernoffstrong}, writing $\varrho'=\varrho-\varrho \log \varrho$,
$$
\pr (\Bin(r,p) \leq L) = \pr (\Bin(r,p) \leq \varrho pr) \leq \exp(-rp\varphi(\varrho-1)) \leq \exp(-rp(1-\varrho')).
$$
Note that $\varrho'$ gets small when $\varrho$ does, even if at a slower rate.
If $p\to0$, using ${\widehat p}=\log(1/(1-p))$, by Lemma~\ref{lem:relations}(i) we have
\[
\exp(-(1-\varrho')rp) \le \left(\frac{{\widehat p} n (1+o(1))}{\log^2 n}\right)^{-(1-\varrho')p/{\widehat p}}
\le \left(p n\right)^{-(1-2\varrho')}.
\]
Now, by our choice of $\varrho=\varepsilon^2$ and using the fact that $2\varepsilon \log \varepsilon \to 0$ as $\varepsilon \to 0$, we have $1-2\varrho'=1-2\varrho+2\varrho \log \varrho > 1-\varepsilon/2$, and the statement follows in this case.
If $p=\Theta(1)$ with $p$ bounded away from $1$, we have
\[
\exp(-(1-\varrho')rp) \le \left(p n\right)^{-\varrho'},
\]
where we assumed that $\varepsilon$ (and thus $\varrho$) was chosen to be small enough so that the following holds: $\varrho' < (1-\varrho')p/\log(1/(1-p))$ (note that $p$ close to $1$ forces a small $\varrho$, and therefore a small $\varepsilon$). The desired statement follows since $\varrho' > \varrho = \varepsilon^2$.
\end{proof}
In order to bound the variance of $Z''_{\overrightarrow{uv}}$, we will need to use that~\eqref{eq:condI} holds for two consecutive values $n-1$ and $n$. Therefore, we assume that there exist infinitely many such pairs of values, and restrict asymptotics to all $n$ such that both $n-1$ and $n$ satisfy~\eqref{eq:condI}.
\begin{lem}\label{lem:var2}
Given a constant $\varepsilon > 0$, assume that $\log^2 n / \sqrt{n} \ll p \leq 1-\varepsilon$. Moreover, suppose there exist infinite sets $I'\subseteq I\subseteq\ensuremath {\mathbb N} $ satisfying~\eqref{eq:condI} and~\eqref{eq:Iprime}, and restrict asymptotics to $n\in I'$. Then,
\[
\var Z''_{\overrightarrow{uv}} = O\left(\frac{\log^4n}{pn} + \frac{\log^3n}{p^2n}\right)(\ex Z''_{\overrightarrow{uv}})^2.
\]
\end{lem}
\begin{proof}
First, observe that $\sG(n,p)-u$ is distributed as $\sG(n-1,p)$, and this is independent of the edges emanating from $u$. By definition, each dominating set $D$ counted by $Z''_{\overrightarrow{uv}}$ is a dominating set of $\sG(n,p)-u$ of size $r$ such that $v\in D$ and $0\le | N(u)\cap D\setminus\{v\} | \le L-1$.
Therefore, we get
\[
\ex Z''_{\overrightarrow{uv}} = \pr(\Bin(r-1,p)<L) \ \ex_{\sG(n-1,p)} Z_v.
\]
Furthermore, given $u\in V$, by counting in two different ways the number of pairs $D,D'$ of dominating sets of $\sG(n,p)-u$ of size $r$ with one marked vertex $v\in D\cap D'$ such that $0\le | N(u)\cap D\setminus\{v\} | \le L-1$, we get
\[
\sum_{v\in V\setminus\{u\}} \ex ({Z''_{\overrightarrow{uv}}}^2) = \sum_{i=1}^r i Q_i \ex_{\sG(n-1,p)} W_i,
\]
where $Q_i$ is defined in~\eqref{eq:Qidef}. Therefore, since the distribution of $Z''_{\overrightarrow{uv}}$ does not depend on $v\in V\setminus\{u\}$,
\[
\ex ({Z''_{\overrightarrow{uv}}}^2) =
\frac{1}{n-1}\sum_{i=1}^r i Q_i \ex_{\sG(n-1,p)} W_i.
\]
Recall from our assumption on $I'$ that $n-1\in I$. Then,
applying Proposition~\ref{prop:variancekey} with $n-1$ instead of $n$ (at the expense of an additional, negligible, multiplicative factor $1+O(1/n)$), we get
\begin{align*}
\ex ({Z''_{\overrightarrow{uv}}}^2) =&
\frac{1}{n-1}\sum_{i=1}^r i Q_i \ex_{\sG(n-1,p)} W_i \\
=&Q_1\frac{r^2}{n^2}\left( 1 + \Theta\left(\frac{\log^4n}{pn} + \frac{\log^3n}{p^2n}\right) \right) (\ex X)^2.
\end{align*}
Hence,
\begin{align*}
\var Z''_{\overrightarrow{uv}} =& Q_1\left(\frac{r}{n}\right)^2\left( 1 + \Theta\left(\frac{\log^4n}{pn} + \frac{\log^3n}{p^2n}\right) \right) (\ex X)^2 -Q_1 (\ex_{\sG(n-1,p)} Z_v)^2 \\
=& Q_1\left(\frac{r}{n}\right)^2\left( 1 + \Theta\left(\frac{\log^4n}{pn} + \frac{\log^3n}{p^2n}\right) \right)(\ex X)^2 -Q_1 \left((1+O(1/n))\frac{r}{n}\ex X \right)^2 \\
=& Q_1 \left(\frac{r}{n}\right)^2 O\left(\frac{\log^4n}{pn} + \frac{\log^3n}{p^2n}\right) (\ex X)^2 \\
=& Q_1 (\ex_{\sG(n-1,p)} Z_v)^2 O\left(\frac{\log^4n}{pn} + \frac{\log^3n}{p^2n}\right)\\
=& \left(\pr(\Bin(r-1,p)<L) \times \ex_{\sG(n-1,p)} Z_v\right)^2 O\left(\frac{\log^4n}{pn} + \frac{\log^3n}{p^2n}\right) \\
=& (\ex Z''_{\overrightarrow{uv}})^2 O\left(\frac{\log^4n}{pn} + \frac{\log^3n}{p^2n}\right),
\end{align*}
and the desired property holds.
\end{proof}
Finally, we proceed to the proof of the main theorem.
\begin{proof}[Proof of Theorem~\ref{thm:main_general}]
Let $\varepsilon>0$ be an arbitrarily small constant such that $n^{-1/3+\varepsilon} \le p \le 1-\varepsilon$, and recall that $G=(V,E)$ denotes a random outcome of $\sG(n,p)$. Corollary~\ref{cor:small_variance} yields immediately the first part of the statement for a less restrictive range of $p$. To prove the second part, we combine the strategy described in Observation~\ref{obs:Y} together with Lemma~\ref{lem:YZ}: our goal is to show that, for some sufficiently small constant $\delta > 0$ (only depending on $\varepsilon$), a.a.s.\ for any set $A$ of at most $\delta np$ edges of $G$, the sum of light and heavy damages of $A$ is strictly less than $\frac34 \ex X$. Thus, since a.a.s.\ $X=(1+o(1)) \ex X$ (by Corollary~\ref{cor:small_variance}), we infer that a.a.s.\ not all dominating sets can be removed by deleting at most $\delta np$ edges of $G$, yielding the desired lower bound on $b(G)$. The upper bound follows from~\eqref{eq:trivialupper1}.
We will first bound the heavy damage of any set of at most $\delta np$ edges in $E$. For convenience, we say that a directed pair $\overrightarrow{uv}$ is present in $G$ (or is a directed edge of $G$) if the corresponding pair $uv$ belongs to $E$. Using Lemma~\ref{lem:var2}, by Chebyshev's inequality and noting that $O\left(\frac{\log^4n}{pn} + \frac{\log^3n}{p^2n}\right)=O\left(\frac{\log^4 n}{p^2 n}\right)$, for any directed pair $\overrightarrow{uv}$ (possibly not present in $G$) and $t>0$
\begin{align}\label{eq:chebyshev0}
\pr \left( \left|Z''_{\overrightarrow{uv}} - \ex Z''_{\overrightarrow{uv}}\right| \geq t \ex Z''_{\overrightarrow{uv}} \right) \le \frac{\var Z''_{\overrightarrow{uv}}}{\left(t \ex Z''_{\overrightarrow{uv}}\right)^2} = O\left( \frac{\log^4 n}{t^2p^2 n} \right).
\end{align}
Making use of the subsubsequence principle (see~e.g.~\cite{JLR}),
we split the analysis into two cases, depending on the asymptotic behaviour of $p$:
set $\nu=2-\varepsilon/2$ if $p=o(1)$; and $\nu=1+\varepsilon^2$ if $p=\Theta(1)$ and $p \leq 1 -\varepsilon$. Using Lemma~\ref{lem:exp_zuv}, the equation above yields
\begin{align}\label{eq:chebyshev1}
\pr \left( Z''_{\overrightarrow{uv}} \geq \frac{\ex X}{(pn)^{\nu}} \left(1 + t\right) \right) = O\left( \frac{\log^4 n}{t^2p^2 n} \right).
\end{align}
Clearly, \eqref{eq:chebyshev1} implies that, uniformly for all $i\ge1$,
\begin{align}\label{eq:chebyshev2}
\pr \left( Z''_{\overrightarrow{uv}} \geq \frac{\ex X}{(pn)^{\nu}} 2^i \right) = O\left( \frac{\log^4 n}{2^{2i} p^2 n} \right).
\end{align}
We call a directed pair ${\overrightarrow{uv}}$ (possibly not in $G$) \textbf{$i$-bad} if
$$
2^i \frac{\ex X}{(pn)^{\nu}} \leq Z''_{\overrightarrow{uv}} < 2^{i+1} \frac{\ex X}{(pn)^{\nu}}
$$
and \textbf{bad} if it is $i$-bad for some $i \geq 1$. Directed pairs that are not bad will be called \textbf{good}.
Observe from its definition that $Z''_{\overrightarrow{uv}}$ is independent of the event that $\overrightarrow{uv}$ is present in $G$. Hence, using~\eqref{eq:chebyshev2}, the probability that a directed pair $\overrightarrow{uv}$ is $i$-bad and is present in $G$ is $p \cdot O\big( \frac{\log^4 n}{2^{2i} p^2 n} \big)$, and therefore
the heavy damage of all bad directed edges in the graph $G$ is in expectation at most
\begin{align*}
n^2 p \sum_{i \geq 1 } 2^{i+1} \frac{\ex X}{(pn)^{\nu}} \; O \left( \frac{\log^4 n}{2^{2i} p^2 n} \right) &= O \left( \frac{\ex X \log^4 n}{p^{1+\nu} n^{\nu-1}} \right) \sum_{i \geq 0} 2^{-i}
= O \left (\frac {\ex X \log^4 n}{p^{1+\nu} n^{\nu-1}} \right).
\end{align*}
Consequently, by Markov's inequality, the heavy damage of all bad directed edges in $G$ is a.a.s.\ at most $\ex X \log^5 n/(p^{1+\nu} n^{\nu-1}) = o(\ex X)$, as long as $p \geq n^{-1/3+\varepsilon}$ and $p \leq 1 - \varepsilon$. On the other hand, the heavy damage of a good directed pair is at most $2\frac{\ex X}{(pn)^{\nu}}$ by definition. Therefore, given any set $A$ of pairs (possibly not in $G$) of size at most $\delta pn$, the heavy damage of the set of all good directed pairs $\overrightarrow{uv}$ such that $uv\in A$ is deterministically at most
\[
2\delta pn \cdot 2\frac{\ex X}{(pn)^{\nu}} = O \Big( \frac{\ex X}{(pn)^{\nu-1}} \Big) = o(\ex X),
\]
where in the last step we used again our assumptions on $p$.
Putting all the above together, we conclude that a.a.s.\ the heavy damage of any set of edges $A$ in the graph $G$ with $|A| \le \delta np$ is
\begin{equation}\label{eq:heavy}
Z^{''}_A = o(\ex X).
\end{equation}
Now we proceed to bound the light damage of any set $A$ of edges in $G$ of size at most $\delta np$.
The analysis bears some similarities to our previous estimation of the heavy damage, but the role of directed pairs will be taken by vertices.
Using Lemma~\ref{lem:vertex}, by Chebyshev's inequality and noting that $\var Z_v = O\left(\frac{\log^4n}{p^2n}\right) (\ex Z_v)^2$, for any vertex $v$ and $s>0$,
\[
\pr \left( |Z_v - \ex Z_v| \geq s \ex Z_v \right) \le \frac{\var Z_v}{\left(s\ex Z_v\right)^2}= O\left(\frac{\log^4 n}{s^2 p^2 n}\right).
\]
Thus,
\begin{equation}\label{eq:chebyshev1b}
\pr \left( Z_v \geq \ex X \frac{r}{n} (1+s) \right) = O\left(\frac{\log^4 n}{s^2 p^2 n}\right).
\end{equation}
Clearly,~\eqref{eq:chebyshev1b} implies that, uniformly for all $i\ge1$,
\begin{equation}\label{eq:chebyshev2b}
\pr \left( Z_v \geq \ex X \frac{r}{n} 2^i \right) = O\left(\frac{\log^4 n}{2^{2i} p^2 n}\right).
\end{equation}
We call a vertex $v$ \textbf{$i$-exceptional}, if
$$
2^i \ex X \frac{r}{n} \leq Z_v \leq 2^{i+1} \ex X \frac{r}{n},
$$
and \textbf{exceptional} if it is $i$-exceptional for some $i \geq 1$.
Let $V_1\subseteq V$ be the set of all exceptional vertices in the graph $G$. We want to bound the number $\sum_{v\in V_1} Z_v$ of dominating sets of size $r$ containing at least one exceptional vertex. Since we are summing over a random set, it is convenient to interpret the previous sum as
\[
\sum_{v\in V_1} Z_v = \sum_{v\in V} Z_v 1_{\{v\in V_1\}} ,
\]
where $1_{\{v\in V_1\}}$ is the indicator function of the event that $v\in V_1$.
Hence, in view of~\eqref{eq:chebyshev2b} and by the linearity of expectation,
\[
\ex \bigg( \sum_{v\in V_1} Z_v \bigg)
= n \sum_{i\geq1} 2^{i+1} \ex X \frac{r}{n} \; O \left( \frac{\log^4 n}{2^{2i}p^2 n}\right) =
O \left( \ex X \frac{r \log^4 n}{p^2 n}\right) \sum_{i\geq 0} 2^{-i}
=O \left(\ex X \frac{\log^5 n}{p^3 n}\right).
\]
Thus, by Markov's inequality, a.a.s.\
\begin{equation}\label{eq:ZV1}
\sum_{v\in V_1} Z_v \le \ex X \frac{\log^6 n}{p^3 n}.
\end{equation}
We call a vertex \textbf{normal} if it is not exceptional. For a normal vertex $v$, $Z_v$ is at most $2\ex X \frac{r}{n}$ by definition.
Now, for a given set $A$ of edges in $G$ of size at most $\delta pn$, let $V(A)$ be the set of vertices containing all endpoints of edges from $A$, that is,
\[
V(A)=\{ v \in V \mid \exists e \in A \mbox { such that } v \in e\}.
\]
Partition $V(A)$ as follows: $V(A)=V_0(A) \cup V_1(A)$, where $V_0(A)$ is the subset of normal vertices, and $V_1(A)$ the subset of exceptional vertices.
From the definition of light damage, we get
\begin{equation}\label{eq:Alight}
Z'_A \le \sum_{v \in V(A)} Z_v/(\varepsilon^2 p r)
= \sum_{v \in V_0(A)} Z_v/(\varepsilon^2 p r) + \sum_{v \in V_1(A)} Z_v/(\varepsilon^2 p r).
\end{equation}
For the first sum on the RHS of~\eqref{eq:Alight}, we have
$$
\sum_{v \in V_0(A)} \frac {Z_v}{\varepsilon^2 p r} \leq \frac{2|V_0(A)|\ex X}{\varepsilon^2 p n} \leq \frac{4|A|\ex X}{\varepsilon^2 p n} \leq \frac{4\delta\ex X}{\varepsilon^2} \le \ex X/2,
$$
deterministically and regardless of the choice of $A$, as long as $\delta\le\varepsilon^2/8$. On the other hand, for the second sum on the RHS of~\eqref{eq:Alight}, we use~\eqref{eq:ZV1}, and obtain that a.a.s.\ for every choice of $A$
\[
\sum_{v \in V_1(A)} \frac {Z_v}{\varepsilon^2 p r}
\le \sum_{v \in V_1} \frac {Z_v}{\varepsilon^2 p r}
\leq \frac{1}{\varepsilon^2 p r} \ex X \frac{ \log^6 n}{p^3 n}
= O \left( \ex X \frac{ \log^5 n}{p^3 n} \right) = o(\ex X),
\]
since $p\geq n^{-1/3+\varepsilon}$. Hence, a.a.s.\ for every set $A$ of edges of $G$ with $|A| \leq \delta np$, we have
$$
Z'_A \leq (1+o(1)) \frac {\ex X}{2}.
$$
Combining this, \eqref{eq:heavy} and Corollary~\ref{cor:small_variance}, we conclude that a.a.s.\ for every choice of $A$,
\[
Z_A < \frac34\ex X < X,
\]
as required. The second part of the statement follows and the proof is finished.
\end{proof}
\bibliographystyle{alpha}
|
\section{Introduction}
Today, DFIGs are the most popular wind power generators in the wind power industry. The use of this machine has certain advantages, such as variable speed, active-reactive power control (by using converters) and the economic cost \cite{ref1}. The layout of a DFIG Wind Turbine (WT) is shown in Fig. \ref{f:fig1_label} \cite{ref2}. Between the rotor and the grid there are two linked converters in a back to back pattern. The only requirement for the power electronic converters is the percentage that must be rated in order to handle a fraction of the total power (rotor power). In most cases, this percentage is about 30\% of the nominal generator power \cite{ref3}. The two converters are connected through a dc-link capacitor which, as an energy storage element, maintains small voltage variations in the dc-link. The control of the torque (or the speed) of the DFIG as well as the power factor at the stator terminals is achieved with the Rotor Side Converter (RSC). The main objective for the Grid Side Converter (GSC) is keeping the dc-link voltage constant despite of the magnitude and direction of the rotor power. The GSC operates at the grid frequency, primarily to produce (leading) or to consume (lagging) reactive power. Typically, a transformer is connected in the middle of the GSC, or the stator, and the grid. The working frequency of RSC depends on the wind speed \cite{ref2}.
Fig. \ref{f:fig2_label} shows the equivalent model of the turbine according to Park’s equations, referenced to the stator. The circuit contains the speed voltage $\varpi\psi$ and the stator and rotor components \cite{ref1}.
The authors in \cite{ref3} discuss how wind power and the type of the WT generator change the damping and the frequency of eigenvalues. In particular, the study shows that wind power tends to improve the damping of inter-area oscillations while the impact on intra-area is not significant. In \cite{ref4} it is shown that New Zealand system’s damping performance is not significantly affected by increasing the wind penetration level. An efficient way to increase the damping of electromechanical oscillations using an auxiliary PSS loop installed in DFIG WT generators is presented in \cite{ref5}. Fernandez \textit{et al.} \cite{ref6} add controllers in active and reactive power control loops of DFIG to enhance the damping of oscillations. In addition, synchronous generators' replacement with DFIG based WF in \cite{ref7}, it is shown that does not degrade the two area system modal characteristics. Nevertheless, WF improves the stability of the inter-area mode of the power system. A damping control method for a STATCOM in a series compensated WF for mitigating subsynchronous resonance and damping oscillations is analyzed in \cite{ref8}. In \cite{ref9} non-linear controllers are implemented for improving the damping of intra-area and inter-area oscillations.
The above references verify the impact of wind generations on electromechanical oscillations. In most cases the goal is to design controllers that can improve network damping. However, the control methods presented in literature can be implemented only for certain systems and do not have universal usage. Moreover, the WFs consist hundreds of WT generators distributed on vast areas. Consequently, it is perplexing to select the feedback signals. Also, conventional PSS methods are practically difficult to implement into the WT generators since their capacity is small and their number is greater compared to the synchronous machines. These differences between conventional power plants and WFs necessitate the design of a controller for DFIG based WFs which has simple theory and can be easily implemented.
The layout of this paper is as follows: It begins by explaining the concepts of RSC, GSC and the dc-link of back-to-back converter. Section \ref{s:modal_analysis} describes the theory behind modal analysis. In Section \ref{s:control} the voltage and damping control strategy is presented. Section \ref{s:system} presents the test system and the study scenarios. Finally in Section \ref{s:results}, simulation results are presented and comments on the results of the system performance are addressed.
\begin{figure}[t]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=3.5in]{Fig1.png}
\caption{DFIG based WT generator \cite{ref2}.}
\label{f:fig1_label}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure}[t]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=2.6in,height=1in]{Fig2.png}
\caption{DFIG equivalent circuit \cite{ref1}.}
\label{f:fig2_label}
\end{figure}
\section{Description of the back-to-back converter}\label{s:back_converter}
This section discusses the arrangement of the back-to-back converter. It presents the rotor-side and grid-side current control reference frames and explains the utility of the dc-link.
\subsection{Rotor side converter}
The RSC applies the voltage to the rotor windings of the DFIG and its purpose is to control the rotor currents. Specifically, it controls the developed torque at the shaft of the machine as far as the rotor flux position is oriented in an optimal way with respect to the stator flux.
On the rotor perspective, the current is disintegrated in two mechanisms: $i_{dr}^{(\varphi)}$ in phase with the stator flux linkage and $i_{qr}^{(\varphi)}$ in quadrature. The electromagnetic rotation and the machine excitation are decoupled and measured by means of $i_{qr}^{(\varphi)}$ and $i_{dr}^{(\varphi)}$, correspondingly. Fig. \ref{f:fig3_label} (a) shows the association between the rotor current phasor $I_r$, the stator flux linkage $\psi_s$, the current components used by the control system $i_{qr}^{(\varphi)}$ and $i_{dr}^{(\varphi)}$, a synchronous rotating reference frame ${d,q}$ which formulates an angle $(\varphi)$ with the stator flux linkage, and the current components in such reference frame $i_{dr}$ and $i_{qr}$ \cite{ref10}.
The RSC regulates the WT output power and voltage (or reactive power) at the machine's stator terminals by using a torque controller such that the power will follow a turbine power-speed characteristic (tracking the maximum power point). The actual power from the generator terminals ($P_{out}$), added to the total power losses, is compared with the reference power ($P_{ref}$) obtained from the WT characteristic. In most cases, a Proportional-Integral (PI) regulator is used at the outer control loop to reduce the error (power/rotor speed error). The output of this regulator is $i_{qr}^{(\varphi)}$ i.e. the reference rotor current that must be injected into rotor winding by the RSC.
\subsection{Grid side converter}
The GSC is designed in such way to regulate the capacitor voltage of the dc bus. In addition, it can generate or absorb reactive power to provide voltage support whenever necessary.
On the grid side, the current is also disintegrated in two mechanisms: $i_{da}^{(\varepsilon)}$ in phase with the stator voltage and $i_{qa}^{(\varepsilon)}$ in quadrature. The active and reactive power exchanged with the grid are also decoupled and controlled by means of $i_{da}^{(\varepsilon)}$ and $i_{qa}^{(\varepsilon)}$, respectively. In this kind of control systems, the active power output ($P_{out}$) of the GSC is used to manage the dc – link voltage level.
Fig. \ref{f:fig3_label} (b) shows the connection between the stator voltage $u_s$, the GSC current $I_a$, the control system current components $i_{da}^{(\varepsilon)}$) and $i_{qa}^{(\varepsilon)}$, a synchronous rotating reference frame ${d,q}$ which formulates an angle $(\varepsilon)$ with the stator voltage, and the current elements in this kind of reference frame $i_{da}$ and $i_{qa}$ \cite{ref10}.
\begin{figure}[t]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=3.5in]{Fig3.png}
\caption{(a) Rotor-side current control reference frame, (b) Grid-side current control reference frame \cite{ref10}.}
\label{f:fig3_label}
\end{figure}
\subsection{DC-Link}
The dc-link capacitor variations of the voltage are represented by the dc-link model which takes as input the power. Eq. \ref{eq:eq_1} shows the energy stored in the dc capacitor \cite{ref10}:
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:eq_1}
W_{dc} = \int P_{dc} dt = \frac{1}{2} \cdot C \cdot V_{dc}^2
\end{equation}
{\setlength{\parindent}{0cm}
where $W_{dc}$ is the stored energy and $P_{dc}$ is the dc-link input power. Eq. \ref{eq:eq_2}} presents the energy and voltage derivatives:
\begin{equation}
\begin{split}
\label{eq:eq_2}
\dfrac{dV_{dc}}{dt} = \dfrac{P_{dc}}{C \cdot V_{dc}} \\
\dfrac{dW_{dc}}{dt} = P_{dc}
\end{split}
\end{equation}
{\setlength{\parindent}{0cm}
The $P_{dc}$ is calculated as $P_{dc} = P_{in} - P_{c}$. $P_{in}$ is the RSC input power and $P_c$ is the GSC output power. The voltage at the dc-link is constant when $P_{dc} = 0$ and varies with respect to $P_{dc}$.}
The GSC controller monitors the dc-link voltage which essentially determines the exported power by the GSC. For example, if the dc-link voltage increases then the GSC can export more real power by increasing the load angle such that the voltage will reduce back to its nominal value. In simple terms, the dc-link voltage represents the power flow balance between generated and exported energy in the rotor side. In the case where the dc-link capacitor input and output power do not match, then the dc-link voltage will change accordingly \cite{ref14}.
\section{Modal Analysis}\label{s:modal_analysis}
Modal analysis of angle stability is concerned with the characteristic modes determination of a system mode linearized about its Stable or Unstable Equilibrium Points (SEP, UEP). It primarily comprises computing eigenvalues, eigenvectors and participation factors. Particularly, analysis of these quantities uncovers the involvement of those machines that are losing synchronism, as for example in an inter-area mode oscillation \cite{ref16}. \ignore {While post-disturbance SEPs are generally easy to determine, computation of UEPs has long been considered as a problematic task \cite{ref17} \ignore{ref18}.} Modal identification \ignore{, on the other hand,} relates to the perseverance of characteristic modes from large-disturbance dynamic behavior, that is gained through transient stability simulations.
The non – linear model that defines the dynamics of a power system, includes a set of differential and algebraic equations (Eq. \ref{eq:eq_3} and \ref{eq:eq_4}) \cite{ref21}:
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:eq_3}
\dot{x} = f(x,y)
\end{equation}
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:eq_4}
0 = g(x,y)
\end{equation}
{\setlength{\parindent}{0cm}
where x and y are the vectors of state variables and algebraic variables, correspondingly.}
A conventional modal analysis is implemented by linearizing the system equations in Eq. \ref{eq:eq_3} about an equilibrium point, $x_o$, defined by:
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:eq_5}
x_o = f(\dot{x_o}) = 0
\end{equation}
Small disturbances around $x_o$ can then be defined by:
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:eq_6}
\Delta\dot{x} = A \cdot \Delta x
\end{equation}
{\setlength{\parindent}{0cm}
where $A$ is the system state matrix defined by:}
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:eq_7}
A = \langle A_{ij} \rangle = \langle \dfrac{\partial f_i}{\partial x_j}\vert _{x=x_o} \rangle
\end{equation}
The characteristic modes of Eq. \ref{eq:eq_6} are generally formed as:
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:eq_8}
\varphi_i \cdot e^{\lambda_i t}
\end{equation}
{\setlength{\parindent}{0cm}
where $\varphi_i$ is the characteristic vector (or right eigenvector) and $ \lambda_i $ is the corresponding eigenvalue. Eigenvalues are solutions of the characteristic equation:}
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:eq_9}
det ( A - \lambda I) = 0
\end{equation}
Lyapunov stability theory states that if all the eigenvalues of matrix $A$ have negative real parts, then the equilibrium point is small signal stable \cite{ref21}. If the eigenvalues are complex and located near the imaginary axis of the complex plane, then are characterized as critical. For an eigenvalue $\lambda = \sigma \pm j \omega$, the frequency of the oscillation is given by $\omega / 2\pi$ and the damping ratio $\zeta$ is given by:
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:eq_10}
\zeta = - \sigma / \sqrt{\sigma^2 + \omega^2}
\end{equation}
The mode shape related to each critical eigenvalue can be used to identify the oscillation types and therefore the generators' location in the power system \cite{ref21}. \ignore{, ref22} In a power system with multiple generators, the dominant electromechanical oscillation mode often present two clusters relative swing. Furthermore, when the electromechanical system is being low-frequency oscillation, the increment of angular speed and power angle of two generators have the characteristics of sinusoidal oscillation with same frequency and reversed phase.
\section{Voltage and damping control systems}\label{s:control}
\subsection{Voltage Control}\label{ss:v_control}
The high penetration level of wind generations affects the power flows and hence the node voltages \cite{ref24}. Due to the fact that WFs replace conventional generators, WFs must contribute to voltage control. As a result, technical regulations for wind power generation are growing at the same rate at its installation \cite{ref25}. The basic approach for the voltage control is to be centralized at the Point of Common Coupling (PCC) that is the voltage bus to which the WF is connected. Fig. \ref{f:fig4_label} illustrates the configuration of the voltage controller. Voltage is transformed from three-phase to direct and quadrature $(dq)$ components. The reference voltage that we want to maintain to the voltage bus is added to $(dq)$ voltage and through a PI controller we get the direct axes current. This current controls the $dq$ voltage of the RSC and hence we are able to regulate the voltage to the desired level.
\begin{figure}[t]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=3.5in]{Fig4.png}
\caption{Voltage Controller.}
\label{f:fig4_label}
\end{figure}
\subsection{Supplementary damping control}\label{ss:d_control}
The unbalanced rotor torque of synchronous generator in power systems has the effect to cause electromechanical oscillations. An effective solution is adding a supplementary damping signal in the active power control loop. \ignore {In \cite{ref26}, damping controllers based on the Phillips-Heffron model are designed for damping low frequency oscillations. In this paper, the damping mechanism is presented and implemented to DFIG RSC control loop from the perspective of dynamic frequency.} The configuration of the SDC system with the traditional lead-lag compensation structure which contributes to improve the damping ratio of machine’s torque is shown in Fig. \ref{f:fig5_label}. It contains a washout filter, a gain block and two lead-lag blocks. The transfer function of the SDC system is presented in Eq. \ref{eq:eq_11}.
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:eq_11}
\small V_{pss} (s) = [K] \cdot \left[ \dfrac{sT_w}{sT_{w} + 1} \right] \cdot \left[ \dfrac{sT_{1n} + 1}{sT_{1d} + 1} \right] \cdot \left[ \dfrac{sT_{2n} + 1}{sT_{2d} + 1} \right]
\end{equation}
{\setlength{\parindent}{0cm}
where $K$ is the SDC system gain, $T_w$ is the washout time constant and $T_{1n}$, $T_{1d}$, $T_{2n}$, $T_{2d}$ are the time constants of the lead-lag blocks. The washout time constant prevents steady changes in speed from modifying the field voltage, whereas the time constants of lead-lag blocks provide the necessary phase compensation.}
The design of the SDC system for WTs is based on the PSSs used for conventional generators. The input can be any signal affected by the oscillation. This fact implies the selection of the PCC as measurement point in order to avoid the filtering effect introduced by the transformer which is connected between the grid and the WF. In this study, the rotation rate deviation $\Delta\omega$ of WF at the PCC is used as input signal. The amplification block affects the amplitude frequency characteristic. The role of washout block is filtering the direct current component. The lead-lag block is used to compensate the phase lag caused by the converter. The output signal can be any variable capable of varying the power delivered to the grid. For our case the excitation voltage is used as the output signal.
The active power transfer function of the excitation controls with SDC system in the current regulator of the RSC control system is given by Eq. \ref{eq:eq_12}:
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:eq_12}
G(s) = \dfrac{\Delta P(s)}{\Delta \omega (s)} = C (sI - A)^{-1}B
\end{equation}
\begin{figure}[t]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=3.5in]{Fig5.jpg}
\caption{Supplementary Damping Controller.}
\label{f:fig5_label}
\end{figure}
\section{Test system and study scenarios}\label{s:system}
\subsection{Test system}\label{ss:test_system}
To evaluate the impact of a DFIG based WF on the electromechanical oscillations, the two-area power network shown in Fig. \ref{f:fig6_label} \cite{ref21} is examined. The system consists two identical areas connected through a relatively weak tie. Each area includes two synchronous generators with equal power outputs and loads which are modeled as constant impedance (full symmetry). Three electromechanical oscillations are present in this system. Two intra-area modes (i.e. generators' oscillations in a certain area of the network against each other), one in each area, and one inter-area low frequency mode (i.e. generators' oscillations in a certain area of the network against generators in another area of the network).
The parameters of the study include different wind penetration levels and different geographical installed locations. The examined level of wind generation is up to 35\% of the parallel synchronous machine capability. Locations constitute the connection of a WF next to the synchronous generator G4 and next to load L1 as shown in Fig. \ref{f:fig7_label} and Fig. \ref{f:fig8_label}, respectively.
\begin{figure}[t]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=3.5in]{Fig6.png}
\caption{Kundur's two-area system.}
\label{f:fig6_label}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure}[t]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=3.5in]{Fig7.png}
\caption{Kundur's two-area system integrated with a WF next to the synchronous generator G4.}
\label{f:fig7_label}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure}[t]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=3.5in]{Fig8.png}
\caption{Kundur's two-area system integrated with a WF next to the load L1.}
\label{f:fig8_label}
\end{figure}
\subsection{Study scenarios}\label{ss:scenarios}
In the case studies, four scenarios are considered. For each case study, the system is simulated with and without PSS for the synchronous conventional generators. Furthermore, a 3-phase fault takes place at the tie-line between the east and west area of the system at \emph{1.0s} and it vanishes \emph{0.2s} later:
\noindent{\bf Case 1}: Without WF connected to the system (Fig. \ref{f:fig6_label}).
\noindent{\bf Case 2}: With WF integrated to the system next to the synchronous generator G4 (Fig. \ref{f:fig7_label}). In order to distinctly highlight the fundamental characteristics of WF, no controls are applied to the WF.
\noindent{\bf Case 3}: With WF integrated to the system next to the load L1 (Fig. \ref{f:fig8_label}). Like the previous case, no controls are applied to the WF.
\noindent{\bf Case 4}: With WF included to the system next to the load L1 (Fig. \ref{f:fig8_label}). In this case, voltage controller and SDC are integrated to the system.
\section{Simulation Results}\label{s:results}
The validation of the presented methods is performed by extracting the eigenvalues of the linearized state-space model using MATLAB/Simulink. The results regarding inter-area and intra-area oscillations are shown in Tables \ref{tab:table1}, \ref{tab:table2}, \ref{tab:table3} and \ref{tab:table4} for the Cases 1, 2, 3 and 4 respectively.
\begin{table}[t]
\centering
\caption{Results of two-area four machine system}
\label{tab:table1}
\renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1}
\begin{tabular}{||c|c|c|c|c||}
\hline
\hline
\multirow{2}{*}{\parbox{1.1cm}{\centering {\bf Case 1}\\}} &
\multirow{2}{*}{\parbox{1.4cm}{\centering {{{\bf Eigenvalue}}}}} &
\multirow{2}{*}{\parbox{1.1cm}{\centering {{{\bf Damping}}}}} &
\multirow{2}{*}{\parbox{0.8cm}{\centering {{{\bf Freq. \\(Hz)}}}}} &
\multirow{2}{*}{\parbox{1.2cm}{\centering {{{\bf Oscillation \\ mode}}}}} \\
{} & {} & {} & {} & {} \\ \hline
\hline
\multirow{3}{*}{\bf {No PSS}} &0.108 $\pm$ 4.027i & \bf{-0.027} & 0.641 & \bf{Inter-area}\\
{} &-0.677 $\pm$ 7.048i & 0.096 & 1.122 & Intra-area1\\
{} &-0.669 $\pm$ 7.269i & 0.092 & 1.157 & Intra-area2\\ \hline
\multirow{3}{*}{\bf {PSS}} &-0.568 $\pm$ 4.055i & \bf{0.139} & 0.645 & \bf{Inter-area}\\
{} &-1.983 $\pm$ 8.276i & 0.233 & 1.317 & Intra-area1\\
{} &-3.011 $\pm$ 9.764i & 0.295 & 1.554 & Intra-area2\\ \hline
\hline
\end{tabular}
\vspace{-0.20in}
\end{table}
\begin{table}[t]
\centering
\caption{Results of two-area four machine system with WF attached next to G4}
\label{tab:table2}
\renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1}
\begin{tabular}{||c|c|c|c|c||}
\hline \hline
\multirow{2}{*}{\parbox{1.1cm}{\centering {\bf Case 2: No PSS}\\}} &
\multirow{2}{*}{\parbox{1.4cm}{\centering {{{\bf Eigenvalue}}}}} &
\multirow{2}{*}{\parbox{1.1cm}{\centering {{{\bf Damping}}}}} &
\multirow{2}{*}{\parbox{0.8cm}{\centering {{{\bf Freq. \\(Hz)}}}}} &
\multirow{2}{*}{\parbox{1.2cm}{\centering {{{\bf Oscillation \\ mode}}}}} \\
{} & {} & {} & {} & {} \\ \hline
\hline
\multirow{3}{*}{\centering {10\%WG}} & 0.094 $\pm$ 4.168i & \bf{-0.023} & 0.663 & \bf{Inter-area}\\
{} &-0.679 $\pm$ 7.048i & 0.096 & 1.122 & Intra-area1\\
{} &-0.625 $\pm$ 7.436i & 0.084 & 1.183 & Intra-area2\\ \hline
\multirow{3}{*}{\centering {25\%WG}} & 0.089 $\pm$ 4.320i & \bf{-0.021} & 0.688 & \bf{Inter-area}\\
{} &-0.680 $\pm$ 7.048i & 0.096 & 1.122 & Intra-area1\\
{} &-0.483 $\pm$ 7.720i & 0.062 & 1.229 & Intra-area2\\ \hline
\multirow{3}{*}{\centering {35\%WG}} & 0.084 $\pm$ 4.405i & \bf{-0.019} & 0.701 & \bf{Inter-area}\\
{} &-0.328 $\pm$ 7.934i & 0.041 & 1.263 & Intra-area1\\
{} &-0.680 $\pm$ 7.049i & 0.096 & 1.122 & Intra-area2\\ \hline \hline
\multirow{2}{*}{\parbox{1.1cm}{\centering {\bf Case 2: PSS}\\}} &
\multirow{2}{*}{\parbox{1.4cm}{\centering {{{\bf Eigenvalue}}}}} &
\multirow{2}{*}{\parbox{1.1cm}{\centering {{{\bf Damping}}}}} &
\multirow{2}{*}{\parbox{0.8cm}{\centering {{{\bf Freq. \\(Hz)}}}}} &
\multirow{2}{*}{\parbox{1.2cm}{\centering {{{\bf Oscillation \\ mode}}}}} \\
{} & {} & {} & {} & {} \\ \hline
\hline
\multirow{3}{*}{\centering {10\%WG}} & -0.617 $\pm$ 4.221i& \bf{0.145}& 0.672 & \bf{Inter-area}\\
{} & -1.802 $\pm$ 8.394i& 0.210& 1.336 & Intra-area1\\
{} & -3.011 $\pm$ 9.763i& 0.295& 1.554 & Intra-area2\\ \hline
\multirow{3}{*}{\centering {25\%WG}} & -0.694 $\pm$ 4.410i& \bf{0.155}& 0.702 & \bf{Inter-area}\\
{} & -1.463 $\pm$ 8.577i& 0.168& 1.365& Intra-area1\\
{} & -3.011 $\pm$ 9.761i& 0.295& 1.554& Intra-area2\\ \hline
\multirow{3}{*}{\centering {35\%WG}} & -0.751 $\pm$ 4.522i& \bf{0.164}& 0.720 & \bf{Inter-area}\\
{} & -1.179 $\pm$ 8.703i& 0.134& 1.385& Intra-area1\\
{} & -3.012 $\pm$ 9.760i& 0.295& 1.553& Intra-area2\\ \hline \hline
\end{tabular}
\vspace{-0.20in}
\end{table}
\begin{table}[t]
\centering
\caption{Results of two-area four machine system with WF attached next to L1}
\label{tab:table3}
\renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1}
\begin{tabular}{||c|c|c|c|c||}
\hline \hline
\multirow{2}{*}{\parbox{1.1cm}{\centering {\bf Case 3: No PSS}\\}} &
\multirow{2}{*}{\parbox{1.4cm}{\centering {{{\bf Eigenvalue}}}}} &
\multirow{2}{*}{\parbox{1.1cm}{\centering {{{\bf Damping}}}}} &
\multirow{2}{*}{\parbox{0.8cm}{\centering {{{\bf Freq. \\(Hz)}}}}} &
\multirow{2}{*}{\parbox{1.2cm}{\centering {{{\bf Oscillation \\ mode}}}}} \\
{} & {} & {} & {} & {} \\ \hline
\hline
\multirow{3}{*}{\centering {10\%WG}} &0.141 $\pm$ 4.127i& \bf{-0.034}& 0.657& \bf{Inter-area}\\
{} &-0.604 $\pm$ 7.180i& 0.084& 1.143& Intra-area1\\
{} &-0.665 $\pm$ 7.278i& 0.091& 1.158& Intra-area2\\ \hline
\multirow{3}{*}{\centering {25\%WG}} &0.172 $\pm$ 4.156i& \bf{-0.041}& 0.661& \bf{Inter-area}\\
{} &-0.331 $\pm$ 7.104i& 0.047& 1.131& Intra-area1\\
{} &-0.762 $\pm$ 7.115i& 0.106& 1.132& Intra-area2\\ \hline
\multirow{3}{*}{\centering {35\%WG}} &0.192 $\pm$ 4.173i& \bf{-0.046}& 0.664& \bf{Inter-area}\\
{} &-0.131 $\pm$ 7.058i& 0.019& 1.123& Intra-area1\\
{} &-0.834 $\pm$ 7.011i& 0.118& 1.116& Intra-area2\\ \hline \hline
\multirow{2}{*}{\parbox{1.1cm}{\centering {\bf Case 3: PSS}\\}} &
\multirow{2}{*}{\parbox{1.4cm}{\centering {{{\bf Eigenvalue}}}}} &
\multirow{2}{*}{\parbox{1.1cm}{\centering {{{\bf Damping}}}}} &
\multirow{2}{*}{\parbox{0.8cm}{\centering {{{\bf Freq. \\(Hz)}}}}} &
\multirow{2}{*}{\parbox{1.2cm}{\centering {{{\bf Oscillation \\ mode}}}}} \\
{} & {} & {} & {} & {} \\ \hline
\hline
\multirow{3}{*}{\centering {10\%WG}} &-0.603 $\pm$ 4.156i& \bf{0.144}& 0.662& \bf{Inter-area}\\
{} &-1.984 $\pm$ 8.276i& 0.233& 1.317& Intra-area1\\
{} &-2.840 $\pm$ 10.057i& 0.272& 1.601& Intra-area2\\ \hline
\multirow{3}{*}{\centering {25\%WG}} &-0.638 $\pm$ 4.172i& \bf{0.151}& 0.664& \bf{Inter-area}\\
{} &-2.123 $\pm$ 8.176i& 0.251& 1.301& Intra-area1\\
{} &-2.633 $\pm$ 9.961i& 0.256& 1.585& Intra-area2\\ \hline
\multirow{3}{*}{\centering {35\%WG}} &-0.660 $\pm$ 4.181i& \bf{0.156}& 0.665& \bf{Inter-area}\\
{} &-2.221 $\pm$ 8.111i& 0.264& 1.291& Intra-area1\\
{} &-2.473 $\pm$ 9.893i& 0.243& 1.575& Intra-area2\\ \hline
\hline
\end{tabular}
\vspace{-0.20in}
\end{table}
\begin{table}[t]
\centering
\caption{Results of two-area four machine system with WF attached next to L1 with controllers and 25\% Wind Generation}
\label{tab:table4}
\renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1}
\begin{tabular}{||c|c|c|c|c|c||}
\hline
\hline
\multirow{2}{*}{\parbox{1.1cm}{\centering {\bf Case 4}\\}} &
\multirow{2}{*}{\parbox{1.4cm}{\centering {{{\bf Eigenvalue}}}}} &
\multirow{2}{*}{\parbox{1.1cm}{\centering {{{\bf Damping}}}}} &
\multirow{2}{*}{\parbox{0.8cm}{\centering {{{\bf Freq. \\(Hz)}}}}} &
\multirow{2}{*}{\parbox{1.2cm}{\centering {{{\bf Oscillation \\ mode}}}}} \\
{} & {} & {} & {} & {} \\ \hline
\hline
\multirow{3}{*}{\bf {No PSS}} &-0.060 $\pm$ 4.223i& \bf{0.014}& 0.672& \bf{Inter-area}\\
{} &-0.351 $\pm$ 7.029i& 0.050& 1.119& Intra-area1\\
{} &-0.760 $\pm$ 7.117i& 0.106& 1.133& Intra-area2\\ \hline \hline
\multirow{3}{*}{\bf {PSS}} &-0.933 $\pm$ 4.040i& \bf{0.225}& 0.643& \bf{Inter-area}\\
{} &-2.121 $\pm$ 8.173i& 0.251& 1.301& Intra-area1\\
{} &-2.709 $\pm$ 9.828i& 0.266& 1.564& Intra-area2\\ \hline
\hline
\end{tabular}
\vspace{-0.20in}
\end{table}
From Tables \ref{tab:table1}, \ref{tab:table2}, \ref{tab:table3} and \ref{tab:table4} we observe that when the power system is integrated with WF, the damping of the system turns weaker without PSS control into the synchronous generators. However, when the PSS control is activated the inter-area oscillations are damped. Comparing this observation when voltage and SDCs are added, the system becomes more stable and the damping is improved. Particularly, in cases 1 to 3 i.e. without integrating voltage controllers and SDCs, the inter-area oscillations have a negative damping contribution when PSS is deactivated. Nevertheless, in case 4, even without PSS activated, the controllers provide positive damping to the system at the inter-tie frequency. The comparison between the test cases when PSS is used shows a 62\% improvement when WF is attached next to L1 and all the controllers are switched-on. Even in the situation where voltage and damping controllers are deactivated, there is a 18\% improvement to the damping ratio with 35\% wind integration next to G4. In order to show the great effect of the controllers, we choose the comparison between the base system (Fig. \ref{f:fig6_label}) and the system presented in Fig. \ref{f:fig8_label} since the latter has slightly worse inter-area oscillation than the system shown in Fig. \ref{f:fig7_label}. The improvement by using the controllers is around 49\%. Finally, the overall improvement between the base study and the study where \begin{enumerate*}[label=\itshape\alph*\upshape)]
\item all the controllers are activated and
\item 25\% wind generation is integrated to the system,
\end{enumerate*} is around 933\% at 0.64Hz.
\section{Conclusions}\label{s:conclusions}
In this paper, the impact of DFIG based WF on the small-signal stability performance is investigated. For the conditions considered, the WF does not degrade the two-area system modal characteristics when the PSS controller is activated into the conventional machines. On the contrary, PSS control improves the damping of inter-area modes when WF penetration level is increasing. The results obtained also show that when the voltage and SDCs are added to the DFIG the system inter-area damping ratio improves dramatically.
\bibliographystyle{IEEEtran}
|
\section{Introduction}
\label{sec.intro}
\subsection{Tetrahedral manifold s}
\label{sub.goal}
We call a cusped hyperbolic 3-manifold {\em tetrahedral} if it can be
decomposed into regular ideal tetrahedra. The combinatorial data of this
decomposition is captured in the {\em combinatorial tetrahedral tessellation} which can be defined simply as an
ideal triangulation where all edges have order 6. By Mostow rigidity, a
combinatorial tetrahedral tessellation \myRemoved{removed uniquely}
determines a tetrahedral manifold. However, there might be several non-isomorphic
\myChanged{(i.e., not related by just relabeling tetrahedra and vertices)}
combinatorial tetrahedral tessellation s yielding the same tetrahedral
manifold. That is why we introduce the two terms tetrahedral manifold{} and combinatorial tetrahedral tessellation{} to
distinguish whether we regard isometric or combinatorially isomorphic objects
as equivalent.
The tetrahedral manifold{} were also called {\em maximum volume} in~\cite{A,VMF,VTF1, VTF2}
because they are precisely the ones with maximal volume among all hyperbolic
manifolds with a fixed number of tetrahedra. Thus, they also appear at the
trailing ends of the \texttt{SnapPy} \cite{SnapPy} census manifolds sharing
the same
letter\footnote{The case of the letter \texttt{m} is exceptional because it
spans several number of tetrahedra for purely historic reasons.} (e.g.,
\texttt{m405} to \texttt{m412}, \texttt{s955} to
\texttt{s961}, \texttt{v3551}, \texttt{t12833} to \texttt{t12845},
\texttt{o9\_44249}). Moreover, the number of tetrahedra and the Matveev
complexity~\cite{Matveev} also coincides for these manifolds.
The census of tetrahedral manifold s illustrates a number of phenomena of arithmetic
hyperbolic manifolds including symmetries visible
in the canonical cell decomposition \myChanged{but hidden by} the combinatorial tetrahedral tessellation.
In particular, the
canonical cell decomposition might have non-tetrahedral cells.
Several manifolds that have played a key role in the development of hyperbolic
geometry are tetrahedral, e.g., the complements of the figure-eight knot, the
minimally twisted 5-chain link (which conjecturally is also the minimum
volume orientable hyperbolic manifold with 5 cusps) and the Thurston
congruence link.
The last two have the special property that their combinatorial tetrahedral tessellation{} is maximally
symmetric, i.e., any tetrahedron can be taken to any other tetrahedron in
every orientation-preserving configuration via a combinatorial isomorphism.
One of the authors has classified link complements with this special
property in previous work \cite{Goerner}.
We also construct several new links with tetrahedral complement.
\subsection{Our results and methods}
\label{sub.results}
Our main goals (see \cite{Goerner:tetcensus} for the data) are the
creation of
\begin{enumerate}
\renewcommand{\theenumi}{\alph{enumi}}
\item \label{goal:ctt}
The census of combinatorial tetrahedral tessellation s up to 25 (orientable case), respectively, 21
(non-orientable case) tetrahedra.
\item \label{goal:homeoCtt}
The grouping by isometry type and the corresponding canonical cell
decompositions.\\
We ship this as a \texttt{Regina} \cite{Regina} file containing
triangulations in a
hierarchy reflecting the grouping.
\item \label{goal:tman}
The corresponding census of tetrahedral manifold s.\\
We ship this as a \texttt{SnapPy} census containing a representative
triangulation for each isometry type.
This census can be used just like any other \texttt{SnapPy} census.
\item \label{goal:morphisms}
The list of covering maps between the combinatorial tetrahedral tessellation s.
\end{enumerate}
For~(\ref{goal:ctt}), we use a new approach differing from the traditional
one that starts by enumerating 4-valent graphs used first by
Callahan-Hildebrand-Weeks~\cite{CHW} \myChanged{or variations of the
traditional approach such as by Burton and Pettersson \cite{Burton:edges}}.
The advantage of our new approach is
that it scales to a substantially higher number of tetrahedra because it
allows for early pruning of triangulations with edges of wrong order. We also
deploy isomorphism signatures to avoid recounting combinatorially isomorphic
triangulations. Recall that the isomorphism signature is an improvement
by Burton~\cite{burton:encode} of the (non-canonical) dehydration sequences.
It is a complete invariant of the combinatorial isomorphism type of a
triangulation. Algorithms~~1 and~2 used for the enumeration of combinatorial tetrahedral tessellation s are
described in Section~\ref{section2}.
Isomorphism signatures of orientable combinatorial tetrahedral tessellation s with at most seven tetrahedra
are presented in Table~\ref{table:isomorph}.
For~(\ref{goal:homeoCtt}), we use a new invariant we call the
{\em isometry signature} (see Section~\ref{section3}). It is a complete
invariant of the isometry type
of a cusped hyperbolic 3-manifold. It is defined as the isomorphism
signature of the canonical retriangulation of the canonical cell
decomposition ~\cite{EP}. To compute it, we use exact arithmetic to certify
the canonical cell decomposition even when the cells are not tetrahedral,
expanding on work by Dunfield, Hoffman, Licata~\cite{DHL}.
For~(\ref{goal:morphisms}), we wrote a script that finds combinatorial
homomorphisms from a triangulation to another triangulation.
Several of the techniques here are new and can be generalized: The
{\em isometry
signature} is an invariant that is defined for any finite-volume cusped
hyperbolic
3-manifolds. It is a complete isometry invariant (and thus by Mostow
rigidity a complete homotopy
invariant) that can be effectively computed and,
in general, be certified whenever the manifold is orientable and the
canonical cell
decomposition contains only tetrahedral cells using
{\tt hikmot}~\cite{hikmot}.
We also provide an improvement of the code provided in \cite{DHL}
to certify
canonical triangulations that is simpler and generalizes to any number
of cusps.
\myRemoved{After reading Burton/Petterson's paper more, I realized that
their approach shares more with the traditional one than with the one
taken here.}
Applying the above discussed methods we obtain the following result.
\begin{theorem}
The number of combinatorial tetrahedral tessellation s and tetrahedral manifold s
up to 25 tetrahedra for orientable manifolds and up to 21 tetrahedra for
non-orientable manifolds are listed in Table~\ref{table:censusNumbers}.
\end{theorem}
\begin{table}
\caption{Number of triangulations in the census.\label{table:censusNumbers}}
\bigskip
\begin{tabular}{r||r|r||r|r||r}
& \multicolumn{2}{|c||}{combinatorial} & \multicolumn{2}{|c||}{tetrahedral}
& \multicolumn{1}{c}{homology} \\
& \multicolumn{2}{|c||}{tet. tessellations} & \multicolumn{2}{|c||}{manifolds}
& \multicolumn{1}{c}{links} \\
Tetrahedra & orientable & non-or. & orientable & non-or. & \\ \hline \hline
1 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 1 & 0 \\ \hline
2 & 2 & 2 & 2 & 1 & 1 \\ \hline
3 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 1 & 0 \\ \hline
4 & 4 & 4 & 4 & 2 & 2 \\ \hline
5 & 2 & 12 & 2 & 8 & 0 \\ \hline
6 & 7 & 14 & 7 & 10 & 0 \\ \hline
7 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 0 \\ \hline
8 & 14 & 10 & 13 & 6 & 5 \\ \hline
9 & 1 & 6 & 1 & 6 & 0 \\ \hline
10 & 57 & 286 & 47 & 197 & 12 \\ \hline
11 & 0 & 17 & 0 & 17 & 0 \\ \hline
12 & 50 & 117 & 47 & 80 & 7 \\ \hline
13 & 3 &8 & 3 & 8 & 0 \\ \hline
14 & 58 &134 & 58 & 113 & 25 \\ \hline
15 & 91 & 975 & 81 & 822 & 0 \\ \hline
16 & 102 & 175 & 96 & 142 & 32 \\ \hline
17 & 8 & 52 & 8 & 52 & 0 \\ \hline
18 & 213 & 1118 & 199 & 810 & 66 \\ \hline
19 & 25 & 326 & 25 & 326 & 0 \\ \hline
20 & 1886 & 26320 & 1684 & 22340 & 209 \\ \hline
21 & 31 & 251 & 31 & 251 & 0 \\ \hline
22 & 390 &- & 381 & - & 148 \\ \hline
23 & 58 &- & 58 & - & 0 \\ \hline
24 & 1544 & - & 1465 & - & 378 \\ \hline
25 & 7563 & - & 7367 & - & 0
\end{tabular}
\end{table}
All combinatorial tetrahedral tessellation s and tetrahedral manifold s indicated in Table~\ref{table:censusNumbers} are
enumerated in supplement files available in~\cite{Goerner:tetcensus}.
Knots and links with tetrahedral complement are shown in
Figures~\ref{f.tetlinks}, \ref{f.tetlinks12} and \ref{fig.remarkable}.
\subsection{Features of the tetrahedral census}
Properties of tetrahedral manifolds that make them
interesting to study include:
\begin{itemize}
\item
\myChanged{The tetrahedral manifolds are arithmetic as they are a proper
subset of the commensurability class of figure-eight knot complement,
closed under finite coverings, see Section~\ref{sec:Margulis}.}
\myComment{
All tetrahedral manifolds are arithmetic and commensurable with the
figure-eight
knot complement, see Lemma~\ref{lem.arithmetic}. The converse is not true:
In Remark~\ref{rem.nottrue}, we list examples of
manifolds commensurable with the figure-eight knot which are not tetrahedral.
\item
The tetrahedral census is closed under finite (possibly irregular) coverings.
We investigate the resulting category in Section~\ref{section:cttCat}.
}
\item
The tetrahedral manifolds are exactly those with maximal volume among all
cusped hyperbolic manifolds with a fixed number of tetrahedra.
\item
Their Matveev complexity equals the number of regular ideal tetrahedra.
\item
Many combinatorial tetrahedral tessellation s \myChanged{hide symmetries, i.e, there are isometries of the
corresponding tetrahedral manifold{} that are not induced from a combinatorial
isomorphism of the combinatorial tetrahedral tessellation.}
\item
A substantial fraction of tetrahedral manifolds are link complements.
\end{itemize}
\section{The enumeration of combinatorial tetrahedral tessellation s}
\label{section2}
\begin{algorithm}
\SetKwProg{Proc}{Procedure}{}{end}%
\SetKwProg{Fn}{Function}{}{end}%
\SetKwFunction{Search}{RecursiveFind}%
\SetKwFunction{Main}{FindAllTetrahedralTessellations}%
\Fn{\Main{integer max, bool orientable}}{
\KwResult{Returns all (non-)orientable tetrahedral tessellations up to
combinatorial isomorphism with at most \ArgSty{max} tetrahedra.}
~
result $\leftarrow \{\}$ \tcc*{resulting triangulations}
already\_seen $\leftarrow \{\}$ \tcc*{isomorphism signatures encountered
earlier}
~
\Proc{\Search{Triangulation $t$}}{
\KwResult{Searches all triangulations obtained from $t$ by gluing faces
or adding tetrahedra.}
~
\tcc{Close order 6 edges and reject unsuitable triangulations}
\If{ \FuncSty{FixEdges(}$t$\FuncSty{)} = ``valid'' }{
\tcc{Skip triangulations already seen earlier}
\If{ \FuncSty{isomorphismSignature(}$t$\FuncSty{)} $\not\in$ already\_seen}{
already\_seen $\leftarrow$ already\_seen $\cup$
\{\FuncSty{isomorphismSignature(}$t$\FuncSty{)}\}\;
\If{ t has no open faces }{
\tcc{t orientable by construction if orientable = true}
\If{t is non-orientable or orientable = true}{
result $\leftarrow$ result $\cup ~\{t\}$\;
}
}
\Else{
\tcc{This choice results in faster enumeration}
choose an open face $F_1$=(tetrahedron, $f_1$) of $t$ adjacent to an
open edge of highest order\;
\If{t has less than max tetrahedra}{
\FuncSty{ResursiveFind(}\ArgSty{t} with a new tetrahedron glued to $F_1$
via an odd permutation\FuncSty{)}
}
\For{each open face $F_2 \not=F_1$ of t}{
\For{each $p \in S_4$}{
\If{$p(f_1)=f_2$}{
\If{p is odd or orientable = false}{
\FuncSty{RecursiveFind(}$t$ with $F_1$ glued to $F_2$ via $p$\FuncSty{)}\;
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
\FuncSty{RecursiveFind(}triangulation with one unglued tetrahedron\FuncSty{)}\;
\KwRet{result}
}
\caption{The main function to enumerate all tetrahedral tessellations.}
\label{algo:main}
\end{algorithm}
\begin{algorithm}
\SetKwProg{Fn}{Function}{}{end}
\SetKwFunction{FRecurs}{FixEdges}%
\Fn{\FRecurs{Triangulation t}}{
\KwResult{t is modified in place. Returns``valid'' or ``invalid''.}
\While{t has open edge e of order 6}{
close edge $e$\;
}
\KwRet{``valid'' if every edge e
\begin{itemize}\vspace{-1mm}\setlength{\itemsep}{0pt}\item has order $<6$
(if open) or $=6$ (if closed) and\item has no projective plane as vertex
link.\end{itemize}}
}
\caption{A helper function closing order 6 edges and rejecting
triangulations which cannot result in tetrahedral tessellations.}
\label{algo:fixEdges}
\end{algorithm}
We use Algorithm~\ref{algo:main} to enumerate the combinatorial tetrahedral tessellation s. The input is the
maximal number of tetrahedra to be considered and a flag indicating whether we
wish to enumerate the orientable or the non-orientable tessellations. The
result is a set of ideal triangulations where each edge has order 6
resulting in manifolds of the desired orientability.
As pointed out in the introduction our algorithm differs from the
traditional approach:
we recursively try all possible ways open faces can be face-paired without
enumerating 4-valent graphs first. This will, of course, result in many
duplicates, so
we keep a set of isomorphism signatures (see \cite{burton:encode}) of
previously encountered triangulations
around to prevent recounting. Recall that an isomorphism signature is,
unlike a dehydration sequence, a complete invariant of the combinatorial
isomorphism type of a triangulation.
The advantage of this approach is that we can insert a procedure that can
prune the
search space early on. In our case, this procedure is given in
Algorithm~\ref{algo:fixEdges} and rejects ideal triangulations where edges
have the wrong
order. It also rejects ideal triangulations with non-manifold topology.
These can occur
when the tetrahedra around an edge cannot be oriented consistently and the
vertex link of
the center of the edge becomes a projective plane $\mathbb{RP}^2$.
The algorithm has been implemented using \texttt{Regina} and we briefly
recall how a triangulation is presented. The vertices of each tetrahedron
are indexed 0, 1, 2, 3 and the faces are indexed by the number of the vertex
opposite to it. Triangulations in intermediate stages will have unpaired
faces. We call a face open if it is unpaired, otherwise closed.
A triangulation consists of a number of tetrahedra and for each
tetrahedron $T_1$ and each face index $f_1=0, ..., 3$, we store two pieces
of data to encode whether and how the face $F_1=(T_1,f_1)$ is glued to
another face $F_2=(T_2,f_2)$ with face index $f_2$ of another
(not necessarily distinct) tetrahedron $T_2$:
\begin{enumerate}
\item A pointer to $T_2$. If $F_1$ is an open face, this pointer is null.
\item An element $p\in S_4$ such that $p(f_1) = f_2$ and the vertex
$i\not =f_1$ of $T_1$ is glued to $p(i)$ of $T_2$.
\end{enumerate}
The face pairings implicitly determine edge classes. We call such an edge
open if it is adjacent to an open face (necessarily so exactly two) and
otherwise closed. Closing an open edge means gluing the two open adjacent
faces by the suitable permutation.
The source for the implementation is in
\texttt{src/genIsomoSigsOfTetrahedralTessellations.cpp}. See
\cite[\texttt{data/}]{Goerner:tetcensus} for isomorphism signatures of all
combinatorial tetrahedral tessellation s from Table~\ref{table:censusNumbers} and Table~\ref{table:isomorph}
for orientable tessellations with $n \leq 7$ tetrahedra. Also names of
manifolds in the census are presented (see Section~\ref{section4}).
\begin{table}[h]
\caption{Isomorphism signatures for all orientable combinatorial tetrahedral tessellation s with $n \leq 7$
tetrahedra. \label{table:isomorph}}
\bigskip
\begin{tabular}{r|l|l||r|l|l}
n & Signatures &Name & n & Signatures & Name \cr \hline
2 & \texttt{cPcbbbdxm} & $\otet02_{0000}$ & 6 & \texttt{gLLPQccdfeefqjsqqjj} & $\otet06_{0000}$ \cr \hline
2 & \texttt{cPcbbbiht} & $\otet02_{0001}$& 6 & \texttt{gLLPQccdfeffqjsqqsj} & $\otet06_{0001}$ \cr \hline
4 & \texttt{eLMkbbdddemdxi} & $\otet04_{0000}$ & 6 & \texttt{gLLPQceefeffpupuupa} & $\otet06_{0002}$ \cr \hline
4 & \texttt{eLMkbcddddedde} & $\otet04_{0001}$ & 6 & \texttt{gLMzQbcdefffhxqqxha} & $\otet06_{0003}$ \cr \hline
4 & \texttt{eLMkbcdddhxqdu} & $\otet04_{0002}$ & 6 & \texttt{gLMzQbcdefffhxqqxxq} & $\otet06_{0004}$ \cr \hline
4 & \texttt{eLMkbcdddhxqlm} & $\otet04_{0003}$ & 6 & \texttt{gLvQQadfedefjqqasjj} & $\otet06_{0005}$ \cr \hline
5 & \texttt{fLLQcbcedeeloxset} & $\otet05_{0000}$ & 6 & \texttt{gLvQQbefeeffedimipt} & $\otet06_{0006}$ \cr \hline
5 & \texttt{fLLQcbdeedemnamjp} & $\otet05_{0001}$ & 7 & \texttt{hLvAQkadfdgggfjxqnjnbw} & $\otet07_{0000}$ \cr
\end{tabular}
\end{table}
\section{The isometry signature}
\label{section3}
In the previous section, we enumerated all combinatorial tetrahedral tessellation s with a given maximal
number of tetrahedra up to combinatorial isomorphism. In the next step,
we want to find the equivalence classes of those combinatorial tetrahedral tessellation s yielding the same
tetrahedral manifold{} up to isometry.
We do this by grouping combinatorial tetrahedral tessellation s by their {\em isometry signature} which we
define, compute and certify in this section. To summarize, the isometry
signature is the isomorphism signature of the canonical retriangulation
of the canonical cell decomposition. If, however, the canonical cell
decomposition has simplices as cells, we short-circuit and just use the
isomorphism signature of the canonical cell decomposition itself.
We can certify the isometry signature by using exact computations to determine
which faces in the proto-canonical triangulation are transparent.
The code implementing the certified canonical retriangulation can be found in
\texttt{src/canonical\_o3.py}. The code to group (and name) the combinatorial tetrahedral tessellation s by
isometry signature
is in
\texttt{src/identifyAndNameIsometricIsomoSigsOfTetrahedralTessellations.py}.
\subsection{Definition} \label{sec:defCanonicalCell}
Recall that the hyperboloid model of 3-dimensional hyperbolic space $\mathbb H^3$
in (3+1)-Minkowski space (with inner product defined by
$\langle x, y\rangle = x_0y_0 + x_1y_1+x_2y_2-x_3y_3$) is given by
$$
S^+=\left\{x=(x_0,...,x_3) \,\, | \,\,
x_3>0, \quad \langle x,x\rangle = -1\right\}.
$$
For a cusped hyperbolic manifold $M$, choose a horotorus cusp neighborhood
of the same volume for each cusp. Lift $M$ and the cusp neighborhoods to
$\mathbb H^3\cong S^+$. The cusp neighborhoods lift to a $\pi_1(M)$-invariant set
of horoballs. For each horoball $B\subset S^+$, there is a dual
vector $v_B$ that is light-like (i.e., $\langle v_B, v_B \rangle =0$) and
such that $w\in B \Leftrightarrow \langle v_B, w\rangle > -1$.
The boundary of the convex hull of all $v_B$ has polygonal faces.
\begin{definition}
The {\em canonical cell decomposition} of $M$ is given by the radial
projection of the polygonal faces of the boundary of the convex hull of
all $v_B$ onto $S^+$.
\end{definition}
The canonical cell decomposition was introduced by Epstein and
Penner~\cite{EP}. It does not depend on a particular choice of cusp
neighborhoods as long as they all have the same volume, or equivalently, same
area.
\begin{definition}
A triangulation which is obtained by subdividing the cells of the canonical
cell decomposition and inserting (if necessary) flat tetrahedra is called
a {\em proto-canonical
triangulation}. If it contains no flat tetrahedra, i.e., all tetrahedra are
positively
oriented, it is called a {\em geometric proto-canonical triangulation}.
\end{definition}
The result of calling \texttt{canonize} on a \texttt{SnapPy} manifold is a
proto-canonical triangulation. If the canonical cell decomposition has
cells which are not ideal tetrahedra (non-regular or regular), there might
be more than
one proto-canonical triangulation of the same manifold. A face of a
proto-canonical triangulation which is part of a 2-cell of the canonical
cell decomposition is called {\em opaque}. Otherwise, a face is called
{\em transparent}.
\begin{definition}
Consider a 2-cell in the canonical cell decomposition which is an $n$-gon.
Pick
the suspension of such an $n$-gon by the centers of the two neighboring
3-cells.
These suspensions over all 2-cells form a decomposition of $M$ into
topological diamonds.
Each diamond
can be split into $n$ tetrahedra along its central axis. The result is
called the {\em canonical retriangulation}.
\end{definition}
The canonical retriangulation carries exactly the same information as the
canonical cell decomposition (just packaged as a triangulation) and thus
only depends on (and uniquely determines)
the isometry type of the manifold. \texttt{SnapPy} uses it internally to
compute, for example, the symmetry group of a hyperbolic manifold $M$ by
enumerating the combinatorial isomorphisms of the canonical retriangulation
of $M$. Similarly, \texttt{SnapPy} uses it to check whether two manifolds
are isometric.
\begin{definition}
The {\em isometry signature} of $M$ is the isomorphism signature of the
canonical retriangulation if the canonical cell decomposition has
non-simplicial cells. Otherwise, it is the isomorphism signature of the
canonical cell decomposition itself.
\end{definition}
\begin{example}
The triangulation of \texttt{m004} given in the \texttt{SnapPy} census
already is the canonical cell decomposition. Thus, the isometry signature
of the manifold \texttt{m004} is the isomorphism signature of the census
triangulation,
namely \texttt{cPcbbbiht} presented in Table~\ref{table:isomorph}. In the
census of tetrahedral hyperbolic manifolds \texttt{m004} named
$\otet02_{0001}$. Recall that this manifold is the figure-eight knot
complement.\\
The cell decomposition for \texttt{m202} given in the \texttt{SnapPy}
census is not canonical. The isomorphism signature of its \texttt{SnapPy}
triangulation is \texttt{eLMkbbdddemdxi} presented in
Table~\ref{table:isomorph}. In the census of tetrahedral hyperbolic
manifolds \texttt{m202} named $\otet04_{0000}$. Observe, that
$\otet04_{0000}$ is the complement of a 2-component link presented in
Figure~\ref{f.tetlinks}. The isometry signature of \texttt{m202} is
\texttt{jLLzzQQccdffihhiiqffofafoaa} that is realized by a triangulation
with ten tetrahedra.
\end{example}
\subsection{Computation of the tilt}
Consider an ideal triangulation ${\mathcal T} = \cup_{i} T_{i}$ of a cusped
manifold $M$ with a shape
assignment for each tetrahedron, i.e., a $z_i\in\mathbb C\setminus\{0,1\}$
determining an embedding of the tetrahedron $T_{i}$ as ideal tetrahedron in
$\mathbb H^3$ up to isometry. If the shapes fulfill the consistency equations
(also known as gluing equations) in
logarithmic form and have positive imaginary parts, we call the triangulation
together with the shape assignment a {\em geometric ideal triangulation}.
Thurston shows that a geometric ideal triangulation glues up to a complete
hyperbolic structure on $M$. Given a geometric ideal triangulation and a
face $F$ of it, the
tilt $\mathrm{Tilt}(F)$ is a real number defined by Weeks~\cite{Weeks}
which determines whether a given triangulation is proto-canonical and
which faces are transparent.
We now describe how to compute $\mathrm{Tilt}(F)$ following
the notation in \cite{DHL} and use it to determine the
canonical retriangulation.
\subsubsection{Computation of a cusp cross section}
The ideal tetrahedra intersect the boundary of a neighborhood of a cusp
in Euclidean triangles and we call the resulting assignment of lengths to
edges a {\em cusp cross
section}. We first compute
a cusp cross section $C_c$ for some neighborhood of each cusp $c$ by picking an
edge $e_j$ for each cusp and assigning length $e_j=1$ to it. We recursively
assign lengths to the other edges by using that the ratio of two edge
lengths
is given by the respective $|z_i^*|$ where $z_i^*$ is one of the edge
parameters $z_i, z'_i=\frac{1}{1-z_i}, z''_i=1-\frac{1}{z_i}$:
\begin{equation*}
e_l =e_k \cdot |z_i^*|. \label{eqn:EdgeRatioCusp}
\end{equation*}
\subsubsection{Computation of the cusp area}
We can compute the area of each Euclidean triangle $t$ as
\begin{equation*}
A(t)=\frac{1}{2} e_k^{\myChanged{2}} \cdot \mathrm{Im}(z_i^*)
\end{equation*}
where $e_k$ and $z_i^*$ are as above. The cusp area $A(C_c)$ of the cusp cross
section $C_c$ is simply the sum of the areas $A(t)$ over all its Euclidean
triangles $t$.
\subsubsection{Normalization of the cusp area}
\myChanged{We need to scale} each cusp cross section \myChanged{to have the
same target area $A$.
The new edge lengths and areas are given by
\begin{equation*}
e'_l = e_l \cdot\sqrt{\frac{A}{A(C_c)}}\quad\mbox{and}
\quad A'(t)=A(t)\frac{A}{A(C_c)}.
\end{equation*}}
\subsubsection{Computation of the circumradius for each Euclidean triangle}
Let $R^i_v$ denote the circumradius of the Euclidean triangle $t$ that is
the cross section of the tetrahedron $i$ near vertex $v\in\{0,1,2,3\}$. If
$e'_j$, $e'_k$, and
$e'_l$ are the edge lengths of $t$, elementary trigonometry implies
\begin{equation*}
R^i_v = \frac{e'_j e'_k e'_l}{4 A'(t)}.
\end{equation*}
\subsubsection{Computation of the tilt of a vertex}
Compute
\begin{equation} \label{eqn:Tilt}
\mathrm{Tilt}(i, v) = R^i_v - \sum_{u\not=v} R^i_u\
\frac{\mathrm{Re}(z_i^*)}{|z_i^*|}
\end{equation}
where $z_i^*$ is the edge parameter for the edge from $u$ to $v$.
\subsubsection{Computation of the tilt of a face}
If the face $F$ opposite to vertex $v$ of tetrahedron $i$ is glued to that
opposite of
$v'$ of tetrahedron $i'$, the tilt of the face is defined as
\begin{equation*}
\mathrm{Tilt}(F) = \mathrm{Tilt}(i,v) + \mathrm{Tilt}(i',v').
\end{equation*}
\subsubsection{Determination of transparent faces and canonical
retriangulation}
Weeks proves that \cite{Weeks}
a geometric ideal triangulation is a geometric proto-canonical
triangulation if all
$\mathrm{Tilt}(F)\leq 0$. In that case, a face $F$ is transparent if and
only if
$\mathrm{Tilt}(F)=0$.
\texttt{SnapPy} implements an algorithm to compute the canonical
retriangulation.
It can be refactored so that it takes as input the opacities of the faces
and is
purely combinatorial. In case of a geometric (!) proto-canonical
triangulation,
Weeks' arguments in the \texttt{SnapPy} code prove that this
algorithm works correctly.
For all manifolds we encountered, several randomization trials were always
sufficient to ensure that the ideal triangulation returned by \texttt{SnapPy}'s
\texttt{canonize} is always geometric proto-canonical. Thus, the result of the
purely combinatorial canonical retriangulation algorithm is known to be correct
as long as we certify the input to be a geometric proto-canonical triangulation
with certified opacities of its faces.
\begin{remark}
Even though we can certify the results for all listed manifolds in the
tetrahedral census, it is not known if
\begin{itemize}
\item
every cusped hyperbolic manifold has a geometric proto-canonical triangulation,
\item
every cusped hyperbolic manifold has a geometric ideal triangulation.
\end{itemize}
Moreover, it is known that \texttt{SnapPy}'s
implementation can give the wrong canonical retriangulation if we use as
input a non-geometric (!)
proto-canonical triangulation. As pointed out by Burton, the triangulation
\texttt{x101} in the non-orientable cusped \texttt{SnapPy} census is such
an example
where flat tetrahedra cause \texttt{SnapPy} to give an incorrect canonical
retriangulation.\\
It is unclear to the authors which of the following factors contribute to
the incorrect result:
\begin{itemize}
\item Numerical precision issues.
\item \texttt{SnapPy}'s extension of the above definition of
$\mathrm{Tilt}(F)$ to flat tetrahedra (where some
$A(t)=0$ and thus $R^i_v=\infty$) using \texttt{CIRCUMRADIUS\_EPSILON}.
\item Week's arguments for the purely combinatorial part of the canonical
retriangulation algorithm seem to implicitly assume that there are no
flat-tetrahedra.
\end{itemize}
\myChanged{
The existence of geometric triangulations of a hyperbolic manifold can be
proven when some tetrahedra are allowed to be flat
\cite{PetronioWeeks:partiallyFlatTrig}. It can also be proven virtually
\cite{LuoSchleimerTillmann:virtualGeometricTrig}.}
\end{remark}
\begin{figure}
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[height=3.8cm]{draws/tetInCube.pdf}
\end{center}
\caption{Subdivision of a cube into 5 tetrahedra. For a regular ideal
hyperbolic cube, all tetrahedra are again regular ideal. The subdivision
introduced additional diagonals on the faces.\label{fig:tetInCube}}
\end{figure}
\begin{remark} \label{remark:burtonPair}
Call a manifold that can be decomposed into regular ideal cubes
{\em cubical}. Recall that a regular ideal cube can be subdivided into 5
regular ideal tetrahedra, see Figure~\ref{fig:tetInCube}. However, this
does not imply that a cubical manifold is tetrahedral.\\
A counter-example is the manifold appearing in the census as
$\texttt{x101}$ and $\texttt{x103}$. Its canonical cell decomposition
consists of one regular ideal cube. As Burton explained~\cite{burton:x101},
$\texttt{x101}$ subdivides the cube into 5 regular ideal tetrahedra but
needs to insert a flat tetrahedron to match the diagonals on the cube.
Thus, it is not a tetrahedral manifold (but still has a tetrahedral
double-cover $\mathrm{ntet}{10}_{0093}).$\\
\texttt{x103} splits the same cube into 6 non-regular tetrahedra and is
a geometric proto-canonical triangulation.
\end{remark}
\subsection{Certification for tetrahedral manifolds}
Let $\sqrt{\mathbb Q^+}$ denote the multiplicative group of all square roots of
positive rational numbers and let $\mathbb Q(\sqrt{\mathbb Q^+})\subset \mathbb C$ be the
field generated by $\sqrt{\mathbb Q^+}$.
\begin{lemma}
If we pick as target area $A=\sqrt{3}$, we have
for a geometric proto-canonical triangulation of a tetrahedral manifold $M$:
$$
z_i^* \in \mathbb Q(\sqrt{-3});\qquad A(C_c)\in \mathbb Q^+\sqrt{3};
$$
$$
|z_i^*|, e_l, A(t), e'_l, A'(t), R^i_v \in \sqrt{\mathbb Q^+};\qquad
\mathrm{Tilt}(F)\in \mathbb Q(\sqrt{\mathbb Q^+}).
$$
\end{lemma}
\begin{proof}
$M$ and thus its universal cover can be decomposed into regular ideal
tetrahedra. The resulting regular tessellation in $\mathbb H^3$ can be chosen
to have vertices at $\mathbb Q(\sqrt{-3})$ (also see Section~\ref{sec.properties}),
thus the shapes of any ideal triangulation of $M$ are in $\mathbb Q(\sqrt{-3})$.\\
Develop a cusp cross section constructed above in $\mathbb C$ such that the
vertices of the edge set to length 1 are at 0 and 1. Then all vertices
have complex coordinates in $\mathbb Q(\sqrt{-3})$ and a fundamental domain in
$\mathbb C$ for the cusp is a parallelogram spanned by two complex numbers in
$\mathbb Q(\sqrt{-3})$.
The area $A(C_c)$ of such a parallelogram is in $\mathbb Q^+\sqrt{3}$.\\
The rest follows from the above formulas.
\end{proof}
We can represent a $z_i^*$ exactly by $r_1+r_2\sqrt{\myChanged{-}3}$ with
$r_1, r_2\in\mathbb Q$. We can represent the other quantities exactly using
Corollary \ref{cor.Galois}
below.
\begin{lemma}
\label{lem.Galois}
Let $p_1,\dots,p_r$ denote a list of distinct prime numbers and
$K=\mathbb Q(\sqrt{p_1},\dots,\sqrt{p_r})$ denote the corresponding number field.
Then,
\begin{itemize}
\item[(a)]
$K/\mathbb Q$ is Galois with Galois group $G(K/\mathbb Q)=(\mathbb Z/2\mathbb Z)^r$.
\item[(b)]
If $\mathbb Q \subset L \subset K$ is a subfield of $K$ such that $[L:\mathbb Q]=2$
then $L=\mathbb Q(\sqrt{p_I})$ where $p_I=\prod_{i \in I} p_i$ for some nonempty
$I \subset \{1,\dots,r\}$.
\item[(c)]
The $\mathbb Q$-linear map
$$
\mathbb Q(\sqrt{p_1}) \otimes_\mathbb Q \mathbb Q(\sqrt{p_2}) \otimes_\mathbb Q \dots
\otimes_\mathbb Q \mathbb Q(\sqrt{p_r}) \to K, \qquad x_1 \otimes \dots \otimes x_r \mapsto
\prod_{i=1}^r x_i
$$
is an isomorphism of $\mathbb Q$-vector spaces.
\end{itemize}
\end{lemma}
\begin{proof}
We will prove this by induction on $r$. When $r=1$ (a) is obvious and (b)
follows from the fundamental theorem of Galois theory~\cite[VI,Thm.1.2]{Lang}.
Assume that the lemma is true for $r-1$, and let
$K_1=\mathbb Q(\sqrt{p_1},\dots,\sqrt{p_{r-1}})$ and $K_2=\mathbb Q(\sqrt{p_r})$.
Then, we claim that $K_1 \cap K_2 =\mathbb Q$. Indeed, otherwise we have $K_2 \subset
K_1$ and by part (b) it follows that $\mathbb Q(\sqrt{p_r})=\mathbb Q(\sqrt{p_I})$
for some nonempty subset $I \subset \{1,\dots,r-1\}$. So,
$\sqrt{p_r}=a + b \sqrt{p_I}$ for $a,b \in \mathbb Q$. Squaring, we get
$$
p_r = a^2 + b^2 p_I, \qquad a b = 0.
$$
If $a=0$ then $p_r=b^2 p_I$ and since $I$ is nonempty, it follows that
$p_i^2$ divides $p_r$ where $p_i, p_r$ are distinct primes, a contradiction.
If $b=0$ then $p_r=a^2$ and $p_r$ is a prime number, also a contradiction.
This shows that $K_1 \cap K_2 =\mathbb Q$. Let
$K=K_1 K_2 =\mathbb Q(\sqrt{p_1},\dots,\sqrt{p_{r}})$ denote the composite field.
It follows by \cite[VI,Thm.1.14]{Lang} that $K$ is a Galois extension
with Galois group $G(K/\mathbb Q)=G(K_1/\mathbb Q) \times G(K_2/\mathbb Q) = (\mathbb Z/2\mathbb Z)^r$.
This proves part (a) of the inductive part. Part (b) follows from part (a)
by the fundamental theorem of Galois theory \cite[VI,Thm.1.2]{Lang} and the
classification of all index 2 subgroups of $(\mathbb Z/2\mathbb Z)^r$.
Part (c) follows from part (a) and the induction hypothesis.
\end{proof}
Part (c) of Lemma \ref{lem.Galois} implies the following corollary.
\begin{corollary}
\label{cor.Galois}
Every element in $\mathbb Q(\sqrt{\mathbb Q^+})$ has a unique representative of the form
\begin{equation}
\label{eq.ri}
r_1\sqrt{n_1}+\dots+r_k \sqrt{n_k}
\end{equation}
where $r_i\in\mathbb Q\setminus 0$ and $n_1<\dots <n_k$ are square-free positive
integers.
\end{corollary}
\begin{remark}
\label{rem.Galois.effective}
For the purpose of effective exact computation, we need an explicit way of
adding, subtracting, multiplying and dividing
expressions of the form ~\eqref{eq.ri}.
This is obvious except for
division where we give the following algorithm: To compute $n/d$ where $n$
and $d$ are two such forms and $d$ contains a non-rational term
$r_j\sqrt{n_j}$, pick a prime $p$ dividing $n_j$. We can write $d$ as
$d_0 + \sqrt{p} d_1$ such that $d_0$ contains no term $r_i\sqrt{n_i}$ with
$p | n_i$. We now have
$$
\frac{n}{d} = \frac{n (d_0-\sqrt{p} d_1)}{(d_0+\sqrt{p}d_1)(d_0-\sqrt{p} d_1)}
= \frac{n (d_0-\sqrt{p} d_1)}{d_0^2 - p d_1^2}.
$$
The new denominator is simpler because it contains no more terms
$r_i\sqrt{n_i}$ with $p | n_i$. Thus, by repeating this process we can
eliminate all primes in the terms of the denominator.
\end{remark}
When we say {\em using interval arithmetics}, we mean:
\begin{enumerate}
\item We convert the exact representation of each quantity in
$\mathbb Q(\sqrt{\mathbb Q^+})$, respectively, $\mathbb Q(\sqrt{-3})$ to an interval $[a,b]$,
respectively, a complex interval $[a,b] + [a',b'] i$. These intervals have
interval semantics: the true value of the quantity is guaranteed to be
contained in the interval.
\item Any operations such as + or $\log$ are carried out such that interval
semantics is preserved, i.e., the resulting interval is again guaranteed to
contain the true value of the computed quantity.
\item An inequality involving an interval is considered certified only if
it is true for all values in the interval. E.g., if the interval given for
$x$ is $[a,b]$, then $x<0$ is certified only if $b<0$.
\end{enumerate}
We can now certify the geometric proto-canonical triangulation and the
opacities of its faces. Our input is a candidate geometric proto-canonical
triangulation obtained by calling \texttt{SnapPy}'s \texttt{canonize} on a
tetrahedral manifold. We first guess exact values $z_i$ from the
approximated shapes reported by \texttt{SnapPy}. Using those guesses, we verify
\begin{enumerate}
\item the rectangular form of the edge equations exactly,
\item $\mathrm{Im}(z_i)>0$ for each tetrahedron (using interval arithmetics),
\item $|e|<10^{-7}$ for each edge where $e$ is the error of the logarithmic
form of the edge equation (using interval arithmetics),
\item all the equations~(\ref{eqn:EdgeRatioCusp}) exactly,
\item $\mathrm{Tilt}(F)<0$ (using interval arithmetics) for an opaque face,
respectively, $\mathrm{Tilt}(F)=0$ (using exact arithmetics) for a
transparent face.
\end{enumerate}
(1) implies that the error in (3) will be a multiple of $2\pi i$ so a
small enough error implies that the logarithmic form of the edge equations
is fulfilled exactly. Together with (2), this means that the tetrahedra
yield a (not necessarily complete) hyperbolic structure. Completeness is
ensured by (4) which checks that the cusp cross section is Euclidean.
Checking (4) really means verifying that the recursion process to obtain
the edge lengths could construct a consistent result. (5) certifies the
geometric proto-canonical triangulation and the opacities of the faces.
\begin{remark}
Note that in the process, we actually produce complex intervals for the
shapes from \texttt{SnapPy}'s approximations certified to contain the true
values. We can do this because we know that the shapes are in the field
$\mathbb Q(\sqrt{-3})$ and thus can guess exact solutions and verify them exactly.
An alternative method to obtain certified intervals from approximated shapes
is the Krawczyk test implemented in \texttt{hikmot} \cite{hikmot}. We could
not use it here though, because it cannot deal with non-orientable
manifolds. The edge equations for a non-orientable manifold are polynomials
in $z_i^*$ and ${1}/{\bar{z}_i^*}$.
\end{remark}
\begin{remark}
We could have also avoided guessing by tracking \texttt{SnapPy}'s
algorithm to obtain a proto-canonical triangulation. We know that the
shapes of the tetrahedral tessellation are all exactly represented by
$\frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{2}\sqrt{\myChanged{-}3} $ and that \texttt{SnapPy}
is performing 2-3 and 3-2 moves during the algorithm. However, this would
require changes to the \texttt{SnapPea} kernel since it does not report the
sequence of moves it performed.
\end{remark}
For guessing a rational representation from an approximation, we use the
\texttt{fractions} module shipped with \texttt{python}. It essentially
computes the continued fraction for a given real number and evaluates it
at a stage where the resulting denominator is less than a given bound
(10000 in our case). For the (complex) interval arithmetics, we use
\texttt{sage}. Our implementation in \texttt{python} is based on the script
given in \cite{DHL}.
\subsection{Certification in the generic case}
Dunfield, Hoffman, L\myChanged{icat}a give an implementation in \cite{DHL}
to certify a triangulation to be the canonical cell decomposition (which
cannot contain non-tetrahedral cells). Though not needed here, we want to
point out that their implementation can be both simplified and generalized
to any number of cusps.
They start with certified complex intervals for the shapes returned by
\texttt{hikmot} \cite{hikmot}. But instead of following the complicated
procedure in \cite[Section 3.7]{DHL}, one can simply apply interval
arithmetics to the above equations to compute $\mathrm{Tilt}(F)$. The
result is an interval $[a,b]$ for each $\mathrm{Tilt}(F)$ that is
guaranteed to contain the true value of $\mathrm{Tilt}(F)$. If $b<0$ for
each interval, then the $\mathrm{Tilt}(F)$ are certified to be less than 0,
thus the given ideal triangulation is the canonical cell decomposition.
We provide a version of \texttt{canonical.py} here that implements this.
\section{Results of the implementation of algorithms}
\label{section4}
We implemented the algorithms described in the previous section, see
\cite{Goerner:tetcensus} for the resulting data. The longest algorithm
to run was the enumeration of the combinatorial tetrahedral tessellation s: the orientable case up to 25
tetrahedra and the non-orientable one up to 21 tetrahedra each took about
$\approx 6$ weeks CPU time and $\approx 70$Gb on a Xeon E5-2630, 2.3Ghz.
The number of resulting combinatorial tetrahedral tessellation s and tetrahedral manifold s are listed in
Table~\ref{table:censusNumbers}.
\subsection{Names of tetrahedral manifolds}
We give the tetrahedral manifold s names such as ``$\otet08_{0002}$'' (orientable),
respectively, ``$\ntet02_{0000}$'' (non-orientable) with ``tet'' followed
by the number of tetrahedra and an index.
The different combinatorial tetrahedral tessellation s corresponding to the same tetrahedral manifold{} are named with an
additional index, e.g., ``$\otet08_{0002}\#0$'', ``$\otet08_{0002}\#1$''. We
choose as canonical representative for an isometry class the first combinatorial tetrahedral tessellation{},
e.g., $\otet08_{0002}\#0$ for the tetrahedral manifold{} $\otet08_{0002}$.\\
The indices are canonical: before indexing the combinatorial tetrahedral tessellation s and tetrahedral manifold s, we
first sort the combinatorial tetrahedral tessellation s within an isometry class lexicographically by
isomorphism signature and then sort the tetrahedral manifold s lexicographically by the
isomorphism signature of their canonical representative.
\subsection{SnapPy census}
Our census of tetrahedral manifold s can be easily accessed from \texttt{SnapPy}. Simply
change to the directory \texttt{snappy} accompanying this article and type
\texttt{from tetrahedralCuspedCensus import *}. The two censuses
\texttt{TetrahedralOrientableCusped\-Census} and
\texttt{TetrahedralNonorientableCuspedCensus} have the same methods as any
other census such as \texttt{OrientableCuspedCensus}. Here are examples of
how to use them:
\begin{verbatim}
>>> from tetrahedralCuspedCensus import *
>>> M=TetrahedralOrientableCuspedCensus['otet02_0000'] # also m003
>>> TetrahedralOrientableCuspedCensus.identify(Manifold('m004'))
otet02_0001(0,0)
>>> len(TetrahedralOrientableCuspedCensus(tets=5)) # Number with 5 tets
2
>>> for M in TetrahedralOrientableCuspedCensus(tets=5):
... print OrientableCuspedCensus.identify(M)
m410(0,0)
m412(0,0)(0,0)
>>> TetrahedralOrientableCuspedCensus.identify(Manifold("m208"))
>>>
\end{verbatim}
\myChanged{The last example shows that \texttt{m208} is not a tetrahedral
manifold since it has only 5 tetrahedra and thus would be in the
tetrahedral census. Note that \texttt{SnapPy}'s \texttt{is\_isometric\_to}
is using numerical methods and can fail to find an isomorphism. To verify
that \texttt{m208} is not tetrahedral, one can certify its isometry
signature\footnote{\myChanged{
We plan a future publication describing how to generalize the techniques
for certifying isometry signatures to all cusped hyperbolic manifold.
The third named author has already incorporated this into SnapPy, beginning
with version 2.3.2, see SnapPy documentation.}} and check that it is not
in the data files \cite{Goerner:tetcensus} provided with this paper.}
\subsection{Regina files}
We also provide the census of combinatorial tetrahedral tessellation s as two \texttt{Regina} files (for
orientable and non-orientable) in the \texttt{Regina} directory
accompanying this article. Each file groups the combinatorial tetrahedral tessellation s first by number of
tetrahedra and then by isometry class. The container for each isometry class
contains the different combinatorial tetrahedral tessellation s as well as the canonical retriangulation.
The \texttt{Regina} files can be inspected using the \texttt{Regina} GUI or
the \texttt{Regina} python API. An example of how to traverse the tree
structure in the file is given in \texttt{regina/example.py}.
\subsection{Morphisms}
\label{section:morphisms}
Similarly to combinatorial isomorphism, we can define a
{\em combinatorial homomorphism} between combinatorial tetrahedral tessellation s, but without the
requirement that different tetrahedra in the source go to the different
tetrahedra in the destination. It assigns to each tetrahedron in the
source a tetrahedron in the destination and a permutation in $S_4$
indicating which vertex of the source tetrahedron is mapped to which
vertex of the destination tetrahedron. These permutations have to be
compatible with the gluings of the source and destination tetrahedra.
If the tessellations are connected and have no open faces, the source
triangulation needs to have the same number of or a multiple of the number
of tetrahedra as the destination. Topologically, a combinatorial
homomorphism is a covering map that preserves the triangulation. We have
implemented a procedure to list all combinatorial homomorphisms for a pair
of triangulations in python.
We give a list of all pairs $(M, N)$ of combinatorial tetrahedral tessellation s such that there is a
combinatorial homomorphism from $M$ to $N$ as a text file
\texttt{data/morphisms.txt}. We do not include the trivial pairs $(M,M)$
or pairs $(M,N)$ which factor through another combinatorial tetrahedral tessellation{} as those can be
recovered trivially through the reflexive and transitive closure. We also
give some of the resulting graphs in \texttt{misc/graphs}. We discuss an
example in more detail later in Section~\ref{section:cttCat}.
\section{Properties of tetrahedral manifold s}
\label{sec.properties}
\myChanged{
\subsection{Tetrahedral manifolds are arithmetic}
\label{sub.arithmetic}
Recall that two manifolds (or orbifolds) are commensurable if they have
a common finite cover. Commensurability is an equivalence relation.
The commensurability class of the figure-eight knot complement {\tt m004}
consists exactly of the cusped
hyperbolic orbifolds and manifolds with invariant trace field $\mathbb Q(\sqrt{-3})$ that
are arithmetic or, equivalently, that have integral traces
\cite[Theorem 8.2.3 and 8.3.2]{MR}. Thus, tetrahedral manifolds are
also arithmetic with the same invariant trace field since
\begin{lemma}
Tetrahedral manifolds are commensurable to {\tt m004}.
\end{lemma}
More precisely, the commensurability class of {\tt m004} also contains the orbifold
$\mathfrak{R}=\mathbb H^3/\mathrm{Isom}(\{3,3,6\})$ where the Coxeter group
$\mathrm{Isom}(\{3,3,6\})$ is the symmetry group of the regular
tessellation $\{3,3,6\}$ by regular ideal tetrahedra. This orbifold can be used
to characterize the tetrahedral manifolds in this commensurability class:
\begin{lemma}
A manifold $M$ is a covering space of $\mathfrak{R}$ if and only if it is
tetrahedral.
\end{lemma}
\begin{proof}
A combinatorial tetrahedral tessellation{} of a manifold $M$ lifts to the tessellation $\{3,3,6\}$ in its
universal cover $\mathbb H^3$. Thus, $\pi_1(M)$ is a subgroup of the symmetry group
$\mathrm{Isom}(\{3,3,6\})$. Consequently, $M$ is a cover of $\mathfrak{R}$.
Conversely, a covering map $M\to\mathfrak{R}$ induces a combinatorial tetrahedral tessellation{} on the manifold
$M$ with the standard fundamental domain of $\mathfrak{R}$ lifting to the
barycentric subdivision of the combinatorial tetrahedral tessellation.
\end{proof}
\subsection{Implications of the Margulis Theorem}
\label{sec:Margulis}
Since {\tt m004} is arithmetic, Margulis Theorem implies that its
commensurator is not discrete and thus the commensurability class of
{\tt m004} contains no minimal element
\cite{neumannReid:Topology90Arithmetic,MR,Walsh}. In particular,
$\mathfrak{R}$ is not the minimal element of the commensurability class.
We thus expect to see the following phenomena in the commensurability
class containing the tetrahedral manifolds:
\begin{itemize}
\item Non-tetrahedral manifolds that are still commensurable with
{\tt m004}. For example, the following manifolds in SnapPy's
{\tt OrientableCuspedCensus} up to 8 simplices have this property:
$${\tt m208, s118, s119, s594, s595, s596, v2873, v2874}$$
\item Tetrahedral manifolds $M$ with different covering maps
$M\to\mathfrak{R}$ inducing non-isomorphic combinatorial tetrahedral tessellation s of the same manifold $M$.
\item Combinatorial tetrahedral tessellations ``hiding symmetries'',
defined as follows.
\end{itemize}
\begin{definition}
A combinatorial tetrahedral tessellation{} $T$ hides symmetries if the corresponding tetrahedral manifold{} $M$ has an
isometry that is not induced from a combinatorial automorphism of $T$.
In other words, if there is an isometry $M\to M$ that does not commute
with the covering map $M\to\mathfrak{R}$ corresponding to $T$.
\label{def:hidesSymmetries}
\end{definition}
In this section, we will illustrate these phenomena using the tetrahedral
census.
\begin{remark}
By definition, the canonical cell decomposition and thus the canonical
retriangulation sees all isometries, so we can detect this by checking
that the number of combinatorial automorphisms of the canonical
retriangulation is higher than those of the combinatorial tetrahedral tessellation. To enable the reader to
do this, the Regina file containing the tetrahedral census
\cite{Goerner:tetcensus} includes the canonical retriangulation as well.
The combinatorial automorphisms can be found using the method
{\tt findAllIsomorphisms} of a Regina triangulation or {\tt find\_morphisms}
in {\tt src/morphismMethods.py}.
\end{remark}
}
\myChanged{
\begin{remark}
The minimum volume orientable cusped hyperbolic orbifold
$\mathfrak{M}=\mathbb H^3/\mathrm{PGL}(2,\mathbb Z[\zeta])$ and the Bianchi orbifold
$\mathfrak{B}=\mathbb H^3/\mathrm{PSL}(2,\mathbb Z[\zeta])$ of discriminant $D=-3$ where
$\zeta=\frac{1+\sqrt{-3}}{2}$ are related to $\mathfrak{R}$ as follows
with each map being a 2-fold covering \cite{neumannReid:SmallVolOrbs}:
$$
\mathfrak{B}\to\mathfrak{M}\to\mathfrak{R}.
$$
Similarly to $\mathfrak{R}$ being the quotient of $\mathbb H^3$ by the symmetry
group of the regular tessellation $\{3,3,6\}$, $\mathfrak{M}$ corresponds
to orientation-preserving symmetries, and $\mathfrak{B}$ corresponds to the
symmetry group of the regular tessellation $\{3,3,6\}$ after two-coloring
the regular ideal tetrahedra.
Thus, the manifold covering spaces of $\mathfrak{M}$ correspond to the
orientable combinatorial tetrahedral tessellation s, and the manifold covering spaces of $\mathfrak{B}$
correspond to orientable combinatorial tetrahedral tessellation s whose tetrahedra can be two-colored. Regina
displays the dual 1-skeleton of a triangulation in its UI under
``Skeleton: face pairing graph'', so we can check whether a combinatorial tetrahedral tessellation{} is a
cover of $\mathfrak{B}$ by testing whether the graph Regina shows is
two-colorable. For example,
all orientable combinatorial tetrahedral tessellation s with \myChanged{fewer} than 5 tetrahedra are covers of
$\mathfrak{B}$. But $\otet05_{0000}$ and $\otet06_{0000}$ are not.
\end{remark}
\begin{remark}
Related results include: \cite{BMR95} show that all once-punctured torus
bundles in the commensurability class of the figure eight-knot complement
{\tt m004} are actually cyclic covers of the tetrahedral manifolds
{\tt m003} and {\tt m004} and thus tetrahedral. The non-arithmetic
hyperbolic once-punctured torus bundles are studied in
\cite{goodmanHeardHodgson:CommensuratorsOfCuspedHyperbolicManifolds}
where an algorithm is given to compute the commensurator of a cusped
non-arithmetic hyperbolic manifold. \cite{RV} study symmetries of or
hidden by cyclic branched coverings of 2-bridge knots.
\end{remark}
}
\myComment{
\subsubsection{Tetrahedral manifold s are arithmetic}
\label{sub.arithmetic}
Two manifolds (or orbifolds) are commensurable if they have a common finite
cover. Commensurability is an equivalence relation. In this section we
use nations from \texttt{SnapPea} census of manifolds. Recall that
{\tt m004} is the figure-eight knot complement and its volume is
$v_{4} = 2.02988321282\ldots$.
The next lemma follows from combining Theorems 3.3.4, 8.2.3 and 8.3.2
of \cite{MR}:
\begin{lemma}
\label{lem.1}
For a cusped hyperbolic manifold $M$, the following are
equivalent:
\begin{itemize}
\renewcommand{\theenumi}{\alph{enumi}}
\item[(a)]
$M$ is commensurable to {\tt m004}.
\item[(b)]
$M$ is arithmetic with invariant trace field $\mathbb Q(\sqrt{-3})$.
\item[(c)]
the invariant trace field of $M$ is $\mathbb Q(\sqrt{-3})$ and $M$ has
integral traces.
\end{itemize}
\end{lemma}
\begin{lemma}
\label{lem.arithmetic}
All tetrahedral manifolds are arithmetic with invariant trace field
$\mathbb Q(\sqrt{-3})$ and commensurable to each other.
\end{lemma}
We will prove this together with Lemma~\ref{lem.RMB} later.
\begin{remark}
\label{rem.nottrue}
The converse to Lemma~\ref{lem.arithmetic} does not hold.
There are 25 manifolds in the {\tt OrientableCensus} with volume
an integer multiple of $v_4$ that are not tetrahedral.
Of those,
$$
{\tt m208, s118, s119, s594, s595, s596, v2873, v2874}
$$
are arithmetic, and commensurable to {\tt m004}.
\end{remark}
\begin{remark}
The converse to Lemma~\ref{lem.arithmetic} holds for
once-punctured torus bundles. Indeed, in~\cite{BMR95} it is shown that a
hyperbolic once-punctured torus bundle is arithmetic and commensurable to
{\tt m004}
if and only if it is a cyclic cover of it or its sister {\tt m003}, both
of which are
tetrahedral manifolds ($\otet02_{0001}$ and $\otet02_{0000}$, respectively).
Hence such a torus bundle is tetrahedral.
\end{remark}
\subsubsection{Relationship to the Bianchi orbifold}
\label{subsection:bianchiRelation}
We call a triangulation two-colorable if the tetrahedra can be assigned
two colors such that no two neighboring tetrahedra have the same color. Let
us now define three orbifolds $\mathfrak{B}$, $\mathfrak{M}$ and
$\mathfrak{R}$. Recall that $\{3,3,6\}$ is the regular tessellation of
$\mathbb H^3$ by regular ideal tetrahedra. Let $\{3,3,6\}^+$ denote the
two-colored regular tessellation. Symmetries of $\{3,3,6\}^+$ are supposed
to preserve the coloring.
If we use the upper half space model of $\mathbb H^3$ which has boundary
$\mathbb C\cup\{\infty\}$ such that
$\mathrm{PSL}(2,\mathbb C)\cong\mathrm{PGL}(2,\mathbb C)\cong\mathrm{Isom}^+(\mathbb H^3)$, we can move
$\{3,3,6\}$ such that one tetrahedron $T$ has vertices at
$\{0,1,\zeta,\infty\}$ where $\zeta=\frac{1+\sqrt{-3}}{2}$. We then have
the following relationship between groups (each inclusion has index 2):
$$
\xymatrix@1{\mathrm{Isom}^+(\{3,3,6\}^+)\,
\ar@{}[r]|-*[@]{\subset} \ar@{=}[d] & \mathrm{Isom}^+(\{3,3,6\})\,
\ar@{}[r]|-*[@]{\subset} \ar@{=}[d] & \mathrm{Isom}(\{3,3,6\})\\
\mathrm{PSL}(2,\mathbb Z[\zeta]) \, \ar@{}[r]|-*[@]{\subset} & \mathrm{PGL}(2,\mathbb Z[\zeta]). }
$$
We denote the corresponding quotients by
$$
\xymatrix@1{\mathfrak{B} \qquad \ar[r] & \qquad \mathfrak{M}\qquad
\ar[r] & \qquad \mathfrak{R}.}
$$
Note that $\mathfrak{R}$ is a reflection orbifold, $\mathfrak{M}$ is also
the orientable cusped minimum volume orbifold and $\mathfrak{B}$ is the
Bianchi orbifold for discriminant $D=-3$
\begin{remark}
\label{remark:fundDom}
We can explicitly give fundamental domains for these orbifolds.
Consider the barycentric subdivision of $\{3,3,6\}$ which divides each
tetrahedron into 24 simplices. Let $T'$ denote a tetrahedron adjacent to
$T$, $F$ a face shared by $T$ and $T'$ and $E$ an adjacent edge.
\smallskip
\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{|c|c|}
\hline
Orbifold & Fundamental Domain\\ \hline \hline
$\mathfrak{R}$ & 1 simplex \\ \hline
$\mathfrak{M}$ & 2 simplices in $T$ touching $E$ and $F$\\ \hline
$\mathfrak{B}$ & 4 simplices in $T$ and $T'$ touching $E$ and $F$\\ \hline
\end{tabular}
\end{center}
\end{remark}
We can now characterize tetrahedral manifolds as follows:
\begin{lemma}
\label{lem.RMB}
\rm{(a)} A manifold $M$ is a covering space of $\mathfrak{R}$ if and only
if it is tetrahedral.\\
\rm{(b)} A manifold $M$ is a covering space of $\mathfrak{M}$ if and only
if it is orientable and tetrahedral.\\
\rm{(c)} A manifold $M$ is a covering space of $\mathfrak{B}$ if and only
if it is orientable and has a two-colorable combinatorial tetrahedral tessellation{}.
\end{lemma}
\begin{remark}
\label{remark:baryOrientability}
Part (c) of Lemma \ref{lem.RMB} is similar to the fact that a triangulation
is orientable if and only if its barycentric subdivision is two-colorable.
\end{remark}
\begin{corollary}
\label{cor.2color}
We can efficiently determine in \texttt{Regina} whether a given combinatorial tetrahedral tessellation{} is a
cover of the Bianchi orbifold $\mathfrak{B}$ by checking whether its dual
1-skeleton is a
two-colorable graph. This graph can be found for a triangulation in the
\texttt{Regina} UI under ``Skeleton: face pairing graph''. For example,
all orientable combinatorial tetrahedral tessellation s with \myChanged{fewer} than 5 tetrahedra are covers of
$\mathfrak{B}$. But $\otet05_{0000}$ and $\otet06_{0000}$ are not.
\end{corollary}
\begin{proof}[Proof of Lemma~\ref{lem.arithmetic} and \ref{lem.RMB}]
First, we show (a) of Lemma~\ref{lem.RMB}.
The combinatorial tetrahedral tessellation{} of $M$ lifts to the tessellation $\{3,3,6\}$ in its universal
cover $\mathbb H^3$.
Thus, $\pi_1(M)$ is a subgroup of the symmetry group
$\mathrm{Isom}(\{3,3,6\})$, and thus $M$ is a cover of $\mathfrak{R}$.
Now, assume that $M$ is a cover of $\mathfrak{R}$. Pick a fundamental
domain for $\mathfrak{R}$ as in Remark~\ref{remark:fundDom}. Let $v$ be
the vertex of this simplex corresponding to a center of a tetrahedron in
$\{3,3,6\}$ and $F$ be the opposite face. As $M$ is a cover of
$\mathfrak{R}$, $F$ lifts to $M$ where it subdivides $M$ into tetrahedra.
Note that this requires $M$ to be a manifold cover so that the link of a
lift of $v$ is indeed a tetrahedron.
(b) follows similarly since $\mathfrak{M}$ is the quotient by those
symmetries in $\mathrm{Isom}(\{3,3,6\})$ that are orientation-preserving.
(c) follows from the fact that a two-coloring of a combinatorial tetrahedral tessellation{} lifts to a
two-coloring of $\{3,3,6\}$, respectively, vice versa descends to a combinatorial tetrahedral tessellation{}
for a subgroup of $\mathrm{Isom}^+(\{3,3,6\})$.
As {\tt m004} is in the same commensurability class as the above three
orbifolds, Lemma~\ref{lem.arithmetic} follows.
\end{proof}
\subsubsection{Hidden symmetries}
Here, we say that a {\em combinatorial tetrahedral tessellation{} realizes a hidden symmetry} if the
corresponding tetrahedral manifold{} has an isometry that does not descend to a
combinatorial isomorphism of the combinatorial tetrahedral tessellation{}. In other words, we are applying
the following definition with $O=\mathfrak{R}$:
\begin{definition}
Let $M\to O$ be a covering map of hyperbolic orbifolds. A
{\em hidden symmetry} of $M\to O$ is a symmetry of $M$ that does not
descend to $O$, i.e., there is no symmetry of $O$ making the following
diagram commute:
$$
\xymatrix{M \ar[d] \ar[r] & M \ar[d] \\ O\ar[r] & O.}
$$
\end{definition}
\begin{remark}
Since the combinatorial tetrahedral tessellation{} as well as the associated canonical retriangulation
are available in the \texttt{Regina} files shipped with this paper, the
reader can easily check whether a combinatorial tetrahedral tessellation{} has hidden symmetries: this is
the case if and only if the number of combinatorial automorphisms of the
canonical retriangulaton is larger than that of the combinatorial tetrahedral tessellation. The combinatorial
automorphisms can be found with \texttt{Regina}'s
\texttt{findAllIsomorphisms} or \texttt{find\_morphisms} in
\texttt{src/morphismMethods.py}.
\end{remark}
Given an orbifold $O$, there is a related notion of hidden symmetry
that can be applied to just a group $\Gamma$ with $O=\mathbb H^3/\Gamma$ and
that is defined in terms of the commensurator and normalizer. We refer
the reader to the existing literature
\cite{Walsh,MR,neumannReid:Topology90Arithmetic}, especially
\cite{goodmanHeardHodgson:CommensuratorsOfCuspedHyperbolicManifolds}
which gives an algorithm for constructing the commensurator. For our
case, where $O=\mathfrak{R}$ and $\Gamma=\mathrm{Isom}(\{3,3,6\})$ is
arithmetic, we only remark that Margulis Theorem (see
\cite[Thm.10.3.5]{MR}) implies that we expect many combinatorial tetrahedral tessellation{} with hidden
symmetries. For hidden symmetries of cyclic branched coverings of
2-bridge knots we mention \cite{RV}.
}
\myComment{
We expect that many combinatorial tetrahedral tessellation s with hidden symmetries exists because
$\mathrm{Comm}(\Gamma)$
We expect many combinatorial tetrahedral tessellation s with hidden
Recall that the commensurator of a subgroup
$\Gamma\subset\mathrm{Isom}(\mathbb H^3)$ (see \cite{Walsh})
$$
\mathrm{Comm}(\Gamma) = \{g\in\mathrm{Isom}(\mathbb H^3)\ |\
\Gamma\mbox{ and }g\Gamma g^{-1}\mbox{ are commensurable}\},
$$
is a complete commensurability invariant of the group $\Gamma$ and
contains the normalizer
$$
\mathrm{N}(\Gamma)=\{g\in\mathrm{Isom}(\mathbb H^3)\ |\ \Gamma = g\Gamma g^{-1}\}.$$
\begin{definition}
Let $\Gamma\subset\mathrm{Isom}(\mathbb H^3)$. A {\em virtual symmetry} of
$\Gamma$ is a coset $g\mathrm{N}(\Gamma)\in \mathrm{Virt}(\Gamma)=
\mathrm{Comm}(\Gamma)/\mathrm{N}(\Gamma)$. A non-trivial virtual symmetry
is called a {\em hidden symmetry}.
\end{definition}
Given an orbifold $O$, we first need to fix a group $\Gamma$ such that
$O\cong \mathbb H^3/\Gamma$ before
we can write down an element $g\mathrm{N}(\Gamma)\in\mathrm{Virt}(\Gamma)$.
However, virtual symmetry can still be defined to be intrinsic to $O$:
\begin{lemma}
Given an orbifold $O$, there is a canonical set $\mathrm{Virt}(O)$
associated to $O$ such that $\mathrm{Virt}(O)$ is canonically isomorphic
to $\mathrm{Virt}(\Gamma)$ once a particular $\Gamma$ with
$O\cong\mathbb H^3/\Gamma$ is chosen.
\end{lemma}
\begin{proof}
Assume we have two groups $\Gamma$ and $\Gamma'$ with
$O\cong \mathbb H^3/\Gamma$. There is a correspondence of
$\mathrm{Virt}(\Gamma)$ and $\mathrm{Virt}(\Gamma')$: if
$h\in\mathrm{Isom}(\mathbb H^3)$ conjugates $\Gamma$ to $\Gamma'$, then an
element $g\mathrm{N}(\Gamma)\in\mathrm{Virt}(\Gamma)$ is send to an
element $gh\mathrm{N}(\Gamma)\in\mathrm{Virt}(\Gamma')$. This element
is well-defined since $h$ is determined up to an element in
$\mathrm{N}(\Gamma)$. Hence, we can obtain a canonical object by
thinking of a {\em virtual symmetry of $O$} as an equivalence class in
$$\mathrm{Virt}(O)=\frac{\{(\Gamma, g\mathrm{N}(\Gamma))\ |\
O\cong\mathbb H^3/\Gamma, g\in\mathrm{Comm}(\Gamma)\}} {(\Gamma,
g\mathrm{N}(\Gamma)) \sim (h\Gamma h^{-1}, gh\mathrm{N}(\Gamma))}.$$
\end{proof}
\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma:hiddenSyms}
Let $O$ be a hyperbolic orbifold. Let $M\to O$ be a covering map. There is
a well-defined map
$$
\mathrm{Isom}(M)\to \mathrm{Virt}(O)
$$
such that (non-)hidden symmetries of $M\to O$ become (non-)hidden
symmetries of $O$.\\
Furthermore, each virtual symmetry of $O$ is realized by a finite covering
$M\to O$, i.e., for every element in $\mathrm{Virt}(O)$, there is an
orbifold $M$ with a covering map $M\to O$ such that there is a symmetry
in $\mathrm{Isom}(M)$ corresponding to the element in $\mathrm{Virt}(O)$.
\end{lemma}
\begin{proof}
The manifold $M$ is a quotient by a subgroup $\Gamma'\subset \Gamma$. A
symmetry of $M$ can be represented by an element $g$ such that
$g\Gamma' g^-1 = \Gamma'$.
The covering map $M\to O$ determines $\Gamma'$ up to conjugation by an
element in $N(\Gamma)$. A symmetry of $M$ is an element $n$ with
$\Gamma$... {\bf \textcolor{red}{$\diamondsuit$} need to finish proof, wonder whether I can reference
literature, but, to my frustration, no article explains it that clearly.}
\end{proof}
In this paper, we are only interested in the case where $O=\mathfrak{R}$
and fix $\Gamma=\mathrm{Isom}(\{3,3,6\})$, so $\mathrm{N}(\Gamma)=\Gamma$.
Margulis Theorem (see \cite[Thm.10.3.5]{MR}) states that
$\mathrm{Comm}(\Gamma)$ is dense, and thus
$\mathrm{Comm}(\Gamma)/\mathrm{N}(\Gamma)$ infinite, if and only if $O$
is arithmetic. This implies the following lemma (where the partial
ordering is given by $M'<M$ if $M'\leftarrow M$):
\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma:infMinEl}
The poset of combinatorial tetrahedral tessellation s has infinitely many minimal elements.
\end{lemma}
\begin{proof}
The orbifold $O=\mathfrak{R}$ is arithmetic and thus has infinitely many
hidden symmetries. For each hidden symmetry, consider all combinatorial tetrahedral tessellation{} $M\to O$
that realize it. Among those, pick one with the minimal number of
tetrahedra. Such a combinatorial tetrahedral tessellation{} is necessarily minimal in the above poset. As
a combinatorial tetrahedral tessellation{} can realize only finitely many hidden symmetries, there must be
infinitely many such minimal combinatorial tetrahedral tessellation s.
\end{proof}
\begin{remark}
If $O$ is non-arithmetic, $\mathbb H^3/\mathrm{Comm}(\Gamma)$ is an orbifold and
the minimal element in the commensurability class of $O$. An algorithm for
computing $\mathrm{Comm}(\Gamma)$ for cusped non-arithmetic manifolds is
given in \cite{goodmanHeardHodgson:CommensuratorsOfCuspedHyperbolicManifolds}.
\end{remark}
}
\subsection{The category of combinatorial tetrahedral tessellation s}
\label{section:cttCat}
\myChanged{ To study the commensurability class containing the tetrahedral
manifolds, we think of it as a category. For this,} recall
the notion of a combinatorial homomorphism from
Section~\ref{section:morphisms}. On the underlying topological space, a
combinatorial homomorphism is a covering map. We thus get two categories
with a forgetful functor \myChanged{$\mathcal{T}\to\mathcal{M}$}:
\begin{definition}
\label{def:categories}
The {\em category \myChanged{$\mathcal{M}$} of \myChanged{manifolds
commensurable with tetrahedral manifold s}} has as objects manifolds commensurable
\myChanged{with} {\tt m004} and as morphisms covering maps.\\
The {\em category \myChanged{$\mathcal{T}$} of combinatorial tetrahedral tessellation s} has as objects
combinatorial tetrahedral tessellation s and as morphisms combinatorial homomorphisms.
\myRemoved{changed order of $\mathcal{T}$
and $\mathcal{M}$}
\end{definition}
\myRemoved{Removed Remark}
\myComment{
\begin{remark}
The first category is equivalent to the category whose objects are
covering maps $M\to \mathfrak{R}$ (with $M$ begin a manifold) and
whose morphisms are commutative diagrams of covering maps
$$
\xymatrix{M \ar[rd] \ar[rr] & & M' \ar[ld]\\ & \mathfrak{R}}
$$
and the forgetful functor takes $M\to \mathfrak{R}$ to $M$.
\end{remark}}
We show a small part of these categories in Figure~\ref{fig:catCtt}
and observe:
\begin{itemize}
\item $\otet04_{0001}\#0$ has two 2-covers (indicated by the solid arrows)
giving two different triangulations $\otet08_{0002}\#0$ and
$\otet08_{0002}\#1$. These triangulations are not combinatorially
isomorphic but yield isometric manifolds (indicated by the dashed line).
\item The figure-eight knot complement, $\otet02_{0001}\#0$, and its
sister, $\otet02_{0000}\#0$, have a common cover $\otet04_{0002}\#0$. More
general, any two combinatorial tetrahedral tessellation s have a common cover combinatorial tetrahedral tessellation {} \myChanged{as they}
are in the same commensurability class.
\item $\otet02_{0001}\#0$ and $\otet02_{0000}\#0$ show that the graph is a
poset with more than one minimal element. In fact, most combinatorial tetrahedral tessellation s in our
census are minimal elements and we conjecture that there are infinitely
many such minimal elements.
\item The figure also shows a manifold \texttt{m208}, \myChanged{which is
non-tetrahedral}. \myChanged{However, as with any manifold in this
commensurability class, it still has a tetrahedral covering space, here}
$\otet08_{0010}\#0$ (the arrow has to be dashed because \texttt{m208} is not
tetrahedral so the map is not a combinatorial homomorphism).
\end{itemize}
\begin{remark}
\label{remark:ExampleHiddenSym}
The last example shows that the \myChanged{combinatorial tetrahedral tessellation{}} $\otet08_{0010}\#0$
\myChanged{hides symmetries as in Definition~\ref{def:hidesSymmetries}}.
To see this, notice that the covering space $\otet08_{0010} \to
\texttt{m208}$ is 2-fold, thus regular and \texttt{m208} is the quotient
of $\otet08_{0010}$ by the group $G=\mathbb Z/2\mathbb Z$ of deck transformations. If
$G$ preserved the combinatorial tetrahedral tessellation{} $\otet08_{0010}\#0$, the quotient \texttt{m208} would
have an induced combinatorial tetrahedral tessellation. But \texttt{m208} is not tetrahedral, thus the
nontrivial
element of $G$ is a symmetry of $\otet08_{0010}\#0$ which is not a
combinatorial homomorphism.
\end{remark}
\begin{figure}
\begin{center}
\scalebox{0.39}{\includegraphics{draws/Orientable8.pdf}}
\end{center}
\caption{A small part of the category
\myChanged{$\mathcal{T}$} of combinatorial tetrahedral tessellation s (solid arrows)
and the larger category \myChanged{$\mathcal{M}$} of \myChanged{manifolds
commensurable with {\tt m004}} (dashed arrows). Multiple morphisms
between two objects are collapsed to just one arrow, automorphisms and
morphisms factoring through another object are dropped.
\label{fig:catCtt}}
\end{figure}
\myRemoved{Small improvements to Figure 2.}
\subsection{Canonical cell decompositions}
\subsubsection{Examples}
The canonical cell decomposition of a tetrahedral manifold{} can:
\begin{itemize}
\item Be a {\bf combinatorial tetrahedral tessellation}.\\
{\bf Examples:} $\otet02_{0000}$ and $\otet10_{0010}$. The latter one has
two combinatorial tetrahedral tessellation s, $\otet10_{0010}\#0$ being the canonical cell decomposition.
\item Be a {\bf coarsening} of a combinatorial tetrahedral tessellation{}.\\ (i.e., the combinatorial tetrahedral tessellation{} is a
subdivision of the canonical cell decomposition.)\\
{\bf Example:} $\otet05_{0001}$. The canonical cell decomposition consist
of single regular ideal cube that can be subdivided into 5 tetrahedra
(see Figure~\ref{fig:tetInCube}) such that the diagonals introduced on
the faces are compatible. This yields the unique (up to combinatorial
isomorphism) combinatorial tetrahedral tessellation{} for this manifold. We elaborate on the relationships
to cubes below.
\item {\bf Neither} of the above.\\
In which case, the canonical cell decomposition can still
\begin{itemize}
\item Consists of (non-regular) tetrahedra.\\
{\bf Example:} $\otet08_{0010}$.
\item Contain cells which are not tetrahedra\\
{\bf Example:} $\otet08_{0001}$. Its canonical cell decomposition contains
some hexahedra obtained by gluing two non-regular tetrahedra.
\end{itemize}
\end{itemize}
\subsubsection{Cubical manifolds}
\myChanged{
Recall from Remark~\ref{remark:burtonPair} that a manifold was called
cubical if it can be decomposed into regular ideal cubes.
Figure~\ref{fig:tetInCube} showed that there are two choices of picking
alternating vertices of a cube, which span a tetrahedron and thus yield a
subdivision of a regular ideal cube into 5 regular ideal tetrahedra. Even
though each cube of a combinatorial cubical tessellation can be subdivided
into regular ideal tetrahedra individually, this only yields a combinatorial tetrahedral tessellation{} if
the choices made are compatible with the face-pairings of the combinatorial
cubical tessellation. We saw $\otet05_{0001}$ above as an example where this
was possible and {\tt x103} in Remark~\ref{remark:burtonPair} as an example
where this was impossible.
}
\myComment{
Even though each ideal cube can be divided into 5 regular ideal tetrahedra
individually, the remark showed an example (\texttt{x103}) where this did
not yield a combinatorial tetrahedral tessellation{}. An example of the opposite where this yields a combinatorial tetrahedral tessellation{}
is the above manifold $\otet05_{0001}$.\\
}
If a manifold is both tetrahedral and cubical, the canonical cell
decomposition can actually consist of regular cubes or regular ideal
tetrahedra (or neither). This is illustrated by the two cubical links given
by Aitchison and Rubinstein \cite{AR:dodecahedral}:
\begin{itemize}
\item The canonical cell decomposition of the complement $\otet10_{0011}$
of the alternating 4-chain link \texttt{L8a21} (see Figure~\ref{f.tetlinks})
consists of two regular ideal cubes.
\item The complement $\otet10_{0006}$ of the other cubical link
\texttt{L8a20} (see Figure~\ref{f.tetlinks}) admits two combinatorial tetrahedral tessellation s up to
combinatorial isomorphism, one of which is equal to the canonical cell
decomposition.
\end{itemize}
\begin{remark}
\myChanged{Figure~\ref{fig:tetInCube} also shows that the choice of 5
regular ideal tetrahedra to subdivide a cube hides symmetries of the cube,
namely, the rotation by $\pi/2$ of the cube that takes one choice to the
other. This rotation is an element in the commensurator but not in the
normalizer of $\mathrm{Isom}(\{3,3,6\})$ and thus a hidden symmetry of
$\mathfrak{R}$. A combinatorial tetrahedral tessellation{} arising as subdivision of a combinatorial
cubical tessellation can hide the symmetries of the combinatorial cubical
tessellation corresponding to this rotation, i.e., there can be symmetries
of the combinatorial cubical tessellation that are not symmetries of the combinatorial tetrahedral tessellation.
}
\myComment{
Cubical manifolds can actually have symmetries visible in the cubical
structure but not the tetrahedral one. To describe this hidden symmetry,
imagine a regular ideal cube and pick a set of alternating vertices.
These alternating vertices span a regular ideal tetrahedron, see
Figure~\ref{fig:tetInCube}. A rotation by $\pi/2$ takes the tetrahedron
to the tetrahedron spanned by the complementary set of vertices. This
rotation is a hidden symmetry of the tetrahedron, and thus $\mathfrak{R}$.\\
The combinatorial tetrahedral tessellation{} of $\otet10_{0011}$ actually realizes this hidden symmetry.
In other words, its two regular ideal cubes can be divided each into 5
regular ideal tetrahedra in a way such that the diagonals introduced on
the faces of each cube match. If we flip all the diagonals on all the
faces, we obtain a different subdivision. Thus, when subdividing to obtain
the combinatorial tetrahedral tessellation, a choice was made and the manifold $\otet10_{0011}$ has a symmetry
taking one of these choices to the other. This symmetry is hidden in the
combinatorial tetrahedral tessellation{}.\\
}
\myChanged{An example of this is $\otet10_{0011}$. }
Other examples are obtained by subdividing the cubical regular
tessellation link complements $\mathcal{U}_{1+\zeta}^{\{4,3,6\}}$,
$\mathcal{U}_2^{\{4,3,6\}}$\myChanged{,} and $\mathcal{U}_{2+\zeta}^{\{4,3,6\}}$
classified in \cite{Goerner}. By definition, each of these three manifolds
can be decomposed into ideal regular cubes such that each flag of a cube,
an adjacent face and an edge adjacent to the face can be taken to any other
flag by a symmetry. In particular, these manifolds contain a symmetry
flipping the diagonals of the faces of the cubes.
\end{remark}
\subsubsection{Canonical combinatorial tetrahedral tessellation s}
\myChanged{We call a combinatorial tetrahedral tessellation{} a regular tessellation if it corresponds} to a regular
covering space of $\mathfrak{R}$ or $\mathfrak{M}$. This is equivalent to
saying that the combinatorial automorphisms act transitively on flags
consisting of a tetrahedron, an adjacent face and an adjacent edge (we drop
the vertex in the flag to allow chiral combinatorial tetrahedral tessellation s) \cite{Goerner}.
\begin{lemma}
Consider a combinatorial tetrahedral tessellation{} \myChanged{$T$}. \myChanged{$T$ is equal to the
canonical cell decomposition of the corresponding tetrahedral manifold{} $M$ if $T$ is a
regular tessellation
or if $M$ has only one cusp. In particular, a tetrahedral manifold{}
with only one cusp has a unique combinatorial tetrahedral tessellation. If $T$ is equal to the canonical cell
decomposition, then $T$ hides no symmetries.}
\myComment{
\begin{center}
\includegraphics{draws/cttImplications.pdf}
\end{center}}
\end{lemma}
\begin{proof}
\myChanged{
Recall from Section~\ref{sec:defCanonicalCell} that the canonical cell
decomposition relies on choosing cusp neighborhoods of the same volume
for each cusp. If $T$ is regular, then each cusp neighborhood intersects
$T$ in the same triangulation. This is also true if $M$ has only one cusp
and there is only one cusp neighborhood to choose. Thus, each end of a
tetrahedron intersects the cusp neighborhoods in the same volume. $T$ lifts
to the regular tessellation $\{3,3,6\}$ of $\mathbb H^3$ and the cusp
neighborhoods lift to horoballs with the same symmetry. Hence, the canonical
cell decomposition is equal to $T$. The other statement follows from the
canonical cell decomposition not hiding any symmetries by definition.}
\myComment{
When computing the tilts in Equation~\ref{eqn:Tilt} for a 1-cusped combinatorial tetrahedral tessellation{},
there is no rescaling of cusp cross sections necessary and all tetrahedra
are regular. Thus, all $R^i_v$ are equal and all
$\mathrm{Im}(z_i^*)=\sqrt{3}/2$ making all tilts negative. Hence, 1-cusped
tetrahedral manifold has a unique combinatorial tetrahedral tessellation{} which is always equal to the
canonical cell decomposition.
Since all symmetries of a manifold are visible in the canonical cell
decomposition, all symmetries are combinatorial isomorphisms if the combinatorial tetrahedral tessellation{}
is equal to the canonical cell decomposition. Thus, such a combinatorial tetrahedral tessellation{} realizes
no hidden symmetries.}
\end{proof}
\myChanged{
\begin{remark}
For some cubical tessellations such as $\mathcal{U}_{1+\zeta}^{\{4,3,6\}}$,
$\mathcal{U}_2^{\{4,3,6\}}$, and $\mathcal{U}_{2+\zeta}^{\{4,3,6\}}$, we can
partition the cusps into two disjoint sets such that no edge connects two
cusps of the same set. If, in the construction of the canonical cell
decomposition, we now pick for cusps in one set cusp neighborhoods of a
volume slightly different from those for cusps in the other set, we no
longer obtain the cubical tessellation but one of the two subdivided combinatorial tetrahedral tessellation s
depending on which set of cusps we favored.
\end{remark}
}
\section{Tetrahedral links}
\label{sec.links}
\subsection{Some facts about tetrahedral links}
Consider a cusped 3-manifold $M$, i.e., the interior of a compact
3-manifold $\bar{M}$ with boundary $\partial\bar{M}$ a disjoint union of
tori. We say that $M$ is a \emph{homology link complement} if the long
exact sequence in homology associated to $(\bar{M},\partial \bar{M})$ is
isomorphic to that of the complement of a link in $S^3$. Let
$i:\partial\bar{M}\to \bar{M}$ denote the inclusion of the boundary. We
thank C. Gord\myChanged{o}n for pointing out to us that (b) implies (d).
\begin{lemma}
\label{lem.homology.link}
Let $M$ be a cusped 3-manifold. The following are equivalent:
\begin{enumerate}
\renewcommand{\theenumi}{\alph{enumi}}
\item $M$ is a homology link complement.
\item $H_1(M;\mathbb Z)=\mathbb Z^c$ where $c$ is the number of cusps.
\item The cuspidal homology
$H^{\mathrm{cusp}}_1(M)=H_1(\bar{M};\mathbb Z)/\mathrm{Im}(i_*)$ vanishes.
\item $M$ is the complement of a link in an integral homology sphere.
\end{enumerate}
\end{lemma}
\begin{proof}
(a) implies (b) since $H_1(\partial \bar{M})\cong\mathbb Z^{2c}$ determines $c$
and $H_1(M)=\mathbb Z^c$ for a link complement in $S^3$. The equivalence of (b)
and (c) was shown in \cite[Lem.6.9]{Goerner}. To prove that (b) implies (d),
we work
by induction on $c$. For $c=0$, $M$ is a homology sphere and thus the
complement of the empty link.
Assuming it is true for $c-1$, pick a component $T$ of $\partial \bar{M}$
and let $H$ be
the image of $H_1(T;\mathbb Z)$ in $H_1(\bar{M};\mathbb Z)$ under the map induced by
inclusion. By Poincare duality,
$H$ has rank $1$ or $2$ (apply
\cite[Chapter VI, Theorem 10. 4]{bredon:top_and_geo} to $\bar{M}$ with
all boundary components but $T$ Dehn-filled). Now we claim that $H$
contains a rank $1$ direct summand of $H_1(\bar{M};\mathbb Z)$ (so one can now do a
Dehn filling on $T$ to reduce $c$ by 1). For if not, then $H$ is contained in
$p H_1(\bar{M};\mathbb Z)$ for some prime $p$. Then
$H_1(T;\mathbb Z_p)$ maps trivially in $H_1(\bar{M};\mathbb Z_p)$, contradicting duality.
It is left to show that (d) implies (a). This follows easily from
Alexander duality \cite{BZ}.
\end{proof}
A homology link $M$ is the complement of a link in the 3-sphere if
and only if there is a Dehn-filling of it with trivial fundamental group.
In that
case, the filling is a homotopy 3-sphere, hence a standard 3-sphere (by
Perelman's Theorem), and the
link is the complement of the core of the filling. \texttt{SnapPy} can
compute the homology of a hyperbolic manifold as well as a presentation of
its fundamental group, before or after filling. Note that links are in
general not determined by their complement, i.e., there are 3-manifolds
that arise as the complement of infinitely many different links~\cite{Gordon}.
On the other hand,
the only tetrahedral knot is the figure-eight knot. This follows from the
fact that
tetrahedral manifolds are arithmetic, and the only arithmetic knot is the
figure-eight
knot~\myChanged{\cite[Theorem 2]{reid:arithmeticity}}. \myRemoved{Changed
reference}
\subsection{A list of tetrahedral links}
Of the 124 orientable tetrahedral manifolds with at most 12 tetrahedra,
27 are homology links and \texttt{SnapPy} identified 13 of them with link
exteriors in its census. Of the remaining 14 homology links,
\begin{itemize}
\item
$\otet04_{0000}$ is the Berge \myChanged{manifold, the complement of a link
in \cite{MP:magicmfdfilling}}\myRemoved{Changed reference},
\item
11 are link complements, with corresponding links shown in
Figure~\ref{f.tetlinks} and~\ref{f.tetlinks12}.\\
(These links were found by drilling some curves until the manifold could
be identified as a complement of a link in SnapPy's \texttt{HTLinkExteriors}.
We then found a framing of some components of the link
such that Dehn-filling gives back the tetrahedral manifold. This gives us a Kirby diagram
of the tetrahedral manifold. Using the Kirby Calculator \cite{kirbycalculator}, we
successfully removed all Dehn-surgeries and obtained a link.)
\item $\otet08_{0003}$ and $\otet10_{0023}$
(with 2 and 1 cusps respectively) are not link complements.\\
(This can be shown
using {\tt fef\_gen.py} \myChanged{based on} \cite{MPR:fivechainfilling}
and available from \cite{fefgen}\myRemoved{Changed reference} to list all
exceptional slopes.\myRemoved{No footnote as this bug has been resolved in
version 1.3 of {\texttt fef\_gen}}
and then compute homologies for those.)
\end{itemize}
The data in Table~\ref{table:censusNumbers} also suggest:
\begin{conjecture}
Every tetrahedral link complement has an even number of tetrahedra (i.e.,
a corresponding combinatorial tetrahedral tessellation{} has an even number of tetrahedra).
\end{conjecture}
\subsection{A remarkable tetrahedral link}
\label{sub.remarkable}
Of the 11580 orientable tetrahedral manifold s with at most 25 tetrahedra, 885
are homology links, and have at most 7 cusps. There is a unique tetrahedral manifold \
with 7 cusps, $\otet20_{0570}$, which is a link complement, and a
2-fold cover of the minimally twisted 5-chain link $L10n113=\otet10_{0027}$.
This remarkable link is shown in Figure~\ref{fig.remarkable}.
\begin{figure}[!hptb]
\centering{
\includegraphics[height=0.12\textheight]{draws/K4a1.pdf}\hspace{5mm}
\includegraphics[height=0.12\textheight]{draws/Berge.pdf}\hspace{5mm}
\includegraphics[height=0.12\textheight]{draws/L6a2.pdf}\hspace{5mm}
\includegraphics[height=0.12\textheight]{draws/L10n46.pdf}
\\
$$
\otet02_{0001}(K4a1) \qquad \quad
\otet04_{0000} \qquad \qquad \quad
\otet04_{0001}(L6a2) \quad
\otet08_{0002}(L10n46)
$$
\\
\includegraphics[height=0.14\textheight]{draws/L8a20.pdf}\hspace{2mm}
\includegraphics[height=0.14\textheight]{draws/L10n88.pdf}\hspace{2mm}
\includegraphics[height=0.14\textheight]{draws/L11n354.pdf}\hspace{2mm}
\includegraphics[height=0.14\textheight]{draws/L8a21.pdf}
\\
$$
\otet10_{0006}(L8a20) \qquad
\otet10_{0042}(L10n88) \qquad
\otet10_{0008}(L11n354) \qquad
\otet10_{0011}(L8a21)
$$
\includegraphics[height=0.14\textheight]{draws/L10n101.pdf}\hspace{5mm}
\includegraphics[height=0.14\textheight]{draws/L12n2201.pdf}\hspace{5mm}
\includegraphics[height=0.14\textheight]{draws/L10n113.pdf}
\\
$$
\otet10_{0014}(L10n101) \qquad
\otet10_{0028}(L12n2201) \qquad
\otet10_{0027}(L10n113)
$$
\includegraphics[height=0.15\textheight]{draws/L12n1739.pdf}\hspace{5mm}
\includegraphics[height=0.15\textheight]{draws/L14n38547.pdf} \hspace{5mm}
\includegraphics[height=0.15\textheight]{draws/L14n24613.pdf}
\\
$$
\otet10_{0043}(L12n1739) \qquad
\otet08_{0009}(L14n38547) \qquad
\otet08_{0001}(L14n24613)
$$
\includegraphics[height=0.15\textheight]{draws/mv8_11.pdf}\hspace{5mm}
\includegraphics[height=0.15\textheight]{draws/mv10_16.pdf} \hspace{5mm}
\includegraphics[height=0.15\textheight]{draws/mv10_17.pdf}\hspace{5mm}
\includegraphics[height=0.15\textheight]{draws/mv10_37.pdf}
\\
$$
\otet08_{0005} \qquad \qquad \quad
\otet10_{0007} \qquad \qquad \qquad \quad
\otet10_{0003} \qquad \qquad \quad
\otet10_{0025}
$$
\caption{The tetrahedral links with at most 10 tetrahedra.}
\label{f.tetlinks}
}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure}[!hptb]
\centering{
\includegraphics[height=0.14\textheight]{draws/otet12_0001.pdf}\hspace{5mm}
\includegraphics[height=0.14\textheight]{draws/otet12_0005.pdf}\hspace{5mm}
\\
$$
\otet12_{0001} \qquad \qquad \qquad \quad \otet12_{0005}
$$
\includegraphics[height=0.14\textheight]{draws/otet12_0006.pdf}\hspace{5mm}
\includegraphics[height=0.14\textheight]{draws/otet12_0010.pdf}\hspace{5mm}
\\
$$
\otet12_{0006} \qquad \qquad \qquad \quad \otet12_{0010}
$$
\\
\includegraphics[height=0.14\textheight]{draws/L10a157.pdf}\hspace{12mm}
\includegraphics[height=0.14\textheight]{draws/L12n2208.pdf}\hspace{12mm}
\includegraphics[height=0.14\textheight]{draws/L13n9382.pdf}\hspace{2mm}
\\
$$
\otet12_{0007}(L10a157) \qquad
\otet12_{0009}(L12n2208) \qquad
\otet12_{0018}(L13n9382)
$$
\caption{The tetrahedral links with 12 tetrahedra.}
\label{f.tetlinks12}
}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure}[!hptb]
\centering{
\includegraphics[height=0.20\textheight]{draws/otet20_0570.pdf}
\caption{The remarkable link $\otet20_{0570}$.}
\label{fig.remarkable}
}
\end{figure}
\subsection*{Acknowledgment}
E.F., V.T. and A.V. were supported in part by the Ministry of Education and
Science of the Russia (the state task number 1.1260.2014/K) and RFBR grant
16-01-00414. S.G. was
supported in part by a National Science Foundation grant DMS-14-06419. M. G.
was supported in part by a National Science Foundation grant DMS-11-07452.
We would like to thank Frank Swenton for adding the features to the
Kirby calculator \cite{kirbycalculator} necessary to draw the new
tetrahedral links, and Cameron Gordon for completing the proof of Lemma
\ref{lem.homology.link}.
\bibliographystyle{hamsalpha}
|
\section{Introduction and Motivation}\label{sec:intro}
The technological evolution of communication devices has fuelled a surge in demand for new multimedia services over next-generation networks. Several standards for video coding and compression have been proposed. Among them, those that enable layered video streaming are gaining momentum. A layered video stream consists of one \emph{base layer} and multiple \emph{enhancement layers}. The base layer ensures a basic reconstruction quality, which progressively improves with the number of recovered enhancement layers. It is natural to adjust
the transmission of each video layer according to the user propagation conditions. In that way, users can eventually recover different sets of video layers, i.e., the same service at different quality levels.
Modern communication standards tackle the reliability issues of multicast communications by means of Application Level-Forward Error Correction (AL-FEC) schemes. However, these kind of codes are usually designed to be applied over large source messages. Hence, AL-FEC codes may lead to a \mbox{non-negligible} communication delay, which is an issue in the case of delay-sensitive multimedia services. That issue can be mitigated by using Unequal Error Protection implementations of Random Linear Network Coding (UEP-RLNC)~\cite{jsacTassi}.
Since the layers of a video stream have different importance levels, UEP-RLNC allows the transmitter to adjust the error protection capability of RLNC according to the importance level of the transmitted video layer. However, the capability of adjusting the protection level of each service layer is just one part of the general resource allocation issue, which is summarized in the following research questions: \textbf{[Q1]}~\emph{How to define an optimization framework that can jointly optimize both transmission parameters and \mbox{UEP-RLNC} parameters?} \textbf{[Q2]}~\emph{How can a service provider allocate radio resources such that an existing Service Level Agreement towards users is not violated?} In the following sections, we will we will propose an answer to those questions.
\section{System Model and Proposed Optimization}\label{sec:sm}
Consider an Orthogonal Frequency-Division Multiple Access (OFDMA) cellular system composed by a Base Station (BS) and $U$ users. A layered data stream is transmitted to the users over $C$ orthogonal broadcast erasure subchannels. Since the service is encoded as in the RLNC principle, each subchannel conveys a stream of \textit{coded packets}. Coded packets transmitted over the same subchannel adopt the same Modulation and Coding Scheme\footnote{If $m^\prime$ and $m^{\prime\prime}$ are indexes of two MCSs and $m^\prime \leq m^{\prime\prime}$, the MCS described by $m^{\prime\prime}$ either uses a higher modulation order or reduced error-correcting capability than the MCS represented by $m^{\prime}$.} (MCS). Subchannel $c$ is modeled as a \mbox{frequency $\times$ time} structure, which spans a certain bandwidth and multiple OFDM symbols. Each coded packet transmitted over $c$ spans a fixed number of OFDM symbols and the same bandwidth of $c$. The bit length of the coded packets is fixed, while the subchannel bandwidth is adapted -- in accordance with the MCS $m_c$ adopted by $c$ -- to fit the bit length of the coded packets.
\begin{figure}[tbd]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.85\columnwidth]{msg}
\vspace{-2mm}\caption{Considered layered source message.}
\label{fig.msg}
\end{figure}
We model a layered service as a sequence of source messages. Each message $\mathbf{x}$ consists of $K$ source packets. The elements of $\mathbf{x}$ are grouped into $L$ \emph{layers}, as in Fig.~\ref{fig.msg}. We define the user Quality-of-Service (QoS) level as the number of \emph{consecutive} layers that can be recovered, starting from the first layer. According to the UEP-RLNC presented in~\cite[Sec.~II.B]{jsacTassi}, for each expanding window $\mathbf{x}_{1:\ell}$, a stream of coded packets $\{y_1, \ldots, y_{N_\ell}\}$ is generated, where $y_j = \sum_{i = 1}^{K_\ell} g_{j,i}\cdot x_i$ and $g_{j,i}$ is randomly selected over $\mathrm{GF}(q)$ of size $q$. We propose the UEP Resource Allocation Model (UEP-RAM), which jointly optimises the number $N_\ell$ of coded packet transmissions associated with each expanding window $\ell$, and the MCS $m_\ell$ used to transmit them. For simplicity, we assume that coded packets associated with different expanding windows are kept separated and transmitted over different subchannels.
We define the indicator variable $\delta_{u,\ell}$ associated with user $u$ and QoS level $\ell$ such that $\delta_{u,\ell}\!=\!1$ if the first $\ell$ service layers are recovered with a probability of at least $\Hat{Q}$; otherwise, $\delta_{u,\ell} = 0$. User $u$ will recover the first $\ell$ service layers if it successfully recovers the $\ell$-th expanding window or \textit{any} of the expanding windows with index greater than $\ell$. Thus, we define $\delta_{u,\ell} = I\left(\bigvee_{i = \ell}^{L} \textrm{P}_{u,i}(N_1, \ldots, N_i, m_1, \ldots, m_i) \!\geq\! \Hat{Q}\right)$, where $I(\cdot)$ is the indicator function\footnote{If $s$ is true, $I(s) = 1$, otherwise $I(s) = 0$.}, and $\textrm{P}_{u,i}(\cdot)$ is the probability that $u$ collects $K_i$ linearly independent coded packets associated with expanding windows with indexes $1, \ldots, i$~\cite[Eq.~(10)]{jsacTassi}.
We define the \emph{system profit} $\sum_{u = 1}^U\sum_{\ell= 1}^L \delta_{u,\ell}$ as the number of video layers that any of the $U$ users can recover, while the \emph{system cost} is the total number of coded packet transmissions $\sum_{\ell = 1}^L N_\ell$. Inspired by a fundamental economics principle, in order to optimize the profit while keeping the cost low, the proposed UEP-RAM maximizes the \emph{profit-cost ratio} as~\cite{iccTassi}
\begin{align}
\text{(UEP-RAM)} & \quad \mathop{\mathop{\textrm{maximize}}_{m_1, \ldots, m_L}}_{N_1, \ldots, N_L} \,\, \sum_{u = 1}^U\sum_{\ell= 1}^L \delta_{u,\ell} \Bigg/ \sum_{\ell = 1}^L N_\ell \label{UEP.of}\\
\textrm{subject to} & \quad \sum_{u = 1}^U \delta_{u,\ell} \geq U \, \Hat{t}_\ell \quad\quad\quad\,\text{$\ell= 1, \ldots, L$} &\label{UEP.c1}\\
& \quad 0 \leq N_\ell \leq \Hat{N}_\ell \quad\quad\quad\quad\text{$\ell= 1, \ldots, L$.}&\label{UEP.c2}
\end{align}
Constraint~\eqref{UEP.c1} ensures that the fraction of users recovering the first $\ell$ video layers shall not be smaller than $\Hat{t}_\ell$. Constraint~\eqref{UEP.c2} imposes that the transmission of expanding window $\ell$ shall not require more than $\Hat{N}_\ell$ coded packet transmissions. Since MCSs and coded packet transmissions per expanding window are optimized altogether, UEP-RAM is the answer to [Q1]. Furthermore, the constraint set~\eqref{UEP.c1}-\eqref{UEP.c2} ensures that predetermined fractions of users recover given subsets of service layers by a certain deadline. That represents the requirements of a SLA to be honoured, hence, [Q2] has also been addressed.
\begin{figure}[t]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.99\columnwidth]{recProb}
\vspace{-7.5mm}\caption{Probability of achieving the QoS level $\ell$ vs. the distance from the centre of the cell, for MrT and heuristic UEP-RAM (``Heu. UEP-RAM''), \mbox{$\ell = 1, \ldots, L$}, in the Single Cell scenario. Vertical dashed lines denote the target coverage associated with each QoS level.}\vspace{-1.5mm}
\label{fig.sc}
\end{figure}
In spite of the apparent complexity of UEP-RAM, it is possible to derive an efficient heuristic strategy by following the same train of thoughts as in~\cite{jsacTassi}. In particular, the proposed heuristic procedure comprises two steps: (i) the optimization of $m_1, \ldots, m_L$, and (ii) the optimization of $N_1, \ldots, N_\ell$. That heuristic can produce good quality solutions in a finite number of steps~\cite{iccTassi}.
\vspace{-2mm}\section{Numerical Results and Discussion}\label{sec:nr}
We consider a Long Term Evolution-Advanced (LTE-A) network composed of $19$ base stations, each of which controls three hexagonal cell sectors. We compared the proposed heuristic UEP-RAM against a common Multi-rate Transmission Strategy (MrT)~\cite[Eq.~(31)-(32)]{jsacTassi}, which (i) does not employ RLNC or AL-FEC error protection strategies, and \mbox{(ii) aims} at maximizing the average user QoS by optimising the MCSs used to transmit each video layer.
First, we consider the \emph{Single Cell (SC) scenario}, where $18$ interfering base stations are organized in two concentric rings centred on the base station multicasting a 4-layer H.264/SVC video stream~\cite{6025326}. Users ($U = 80$) are regularly placed on the radial line representing the symmetry axis of a cell sector of the central cell. Fig.~\ref{fig.sc} shows the probability of recovering the first $\ell$ video layers as a function of the distance from the base station in the centre of the cell. We observe that the proposed UEP-RAM comfortably meets the service coverage constraints. In addition, UEP-RAM ensures a service coverage which is considerably greater than that of MrT.
\begin{figure}[t!]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.63\columnwidth]{sfn}
\vspace{-3mm}\caption{QoS levels provided by the MrT and heuristic UEP-RAM (``Heu. UEP-RAM'') strategies (black circles represent the base stations), in the SFN scenario.}\vspace{-1mm}
\label{fig.sfn}
\end{figure}
We also considered the \emph{Single Frequency Network (SFN) scenario}, where $4$ base stations, surrounded by the remaining $15$ interfering base stations, realize a LTE-A SFN~\cite{sesia2011lte}. The SFN multicasts the aforementioned video stream to users \mbox{($U = 1700$)} placed at the vertices of a regular square grid placed on the playground. Also in this case, coverage constraints are met. Fig.~\ref{fig.sfn} also provides a visual comparison of the coverage areas offered by MrT and UEP-RAM. Coloured regions depict areas where users can achieve a specific QoS level. Once more, we observe that UEP-RAM ensures a service coverage which is considerably greater than that of MrT.
\bibliographystyle{IEEEtran}
|
\section{Introduction}
The operator product expansion (OPE)~\cite{Wilson:1969zs} is a fundamental
tool for theoretical analyses in quantum field theories.
Its validity is only proven
rigorously within perturbation theory, to arbitrary finite
orders~\cite{Zimmermann:1972tv}. The use of the OPE
in a non-perturbative framework was initiated
by the ITEP group~\cite{Vainshtein:1978wd}
(see also the discussion in~Ref.~\cite{Novikov:1984rf}), who postulated
that the OPE of a correlator could be approximated by the following series:
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:ope1}
\mathrm{correlator}(Q) \simeq \sum_d\frac{1}{Q^d}C_d(\alpha)
\langle O_d \rangle
\,,
\end{equation}
where the expectation values of local operators $O_d$
are suppressed by inverse powers of a large
external momentum $Q\gg\Lambda_{\mathrm{QCD}}$, according to their dimensionality $d$.
The Wilson coefficients $C_d(\alpha)$
encode the physics at momentum scales larger than $Q$.
These are well approximated by perturbative
expansions in the strong coupling parameter $\alpha$:
\begin{equation}
C_d(\alpha) \simeq \sum_{n\geq 0} c_n\alpha^{n+1}\,.
\end{equation}
The large-distance
physics is described by the matrix elements
$\langle O_d \rangle$ that usually have to be
determined non-perturbatively: $\langle O_d \rangle \sim \Lambda_{\mathrm{QCD}}^d$.
It can hardly be overemphasized that (except for direct
predictions of non-perturbative lattice simulations, e.g., on
light hadron masses)
all QCD predictions are based on factorizations that are generalizations of the above generic OPE.
There exist some major questions related to the OPE
that have to be addressed:\footnote{There are also some important points
that we do not address here, including:\\
We do not consider ambiguities associated to short-distance
non-perturbative effects, which would give rise to
singularities further away from the origin of the Borel plane
than those we study here.\\
We take the validity of the OPE in pure perturbation theory for granted.
This assumption is solid in cases with a single large scale, $Q^2$, and
in Euclidean spacetime.\\
We will not discuss the validity of the (non-perturbative) OPE
for timelike distances that can occur in Minkowski
spacetime, an issue related to possible violations of
quark-hadron duality.}
\begin{itemize}
\item
Are the perturbative expansions of Wilson coefficients asymptotic series?
\item
If so: are the associated ambiguities of the asymptotic behavior
consistent with the OPE, i.e.\ with the positions of the
expected renormalons~\cite{Hooft} in the Borel plane?
\item
Is the OPE valid beyond perturbation theory?
\item
What is the real size of the first non-perturbative
correction within a given OPE expansion?
\item
Is this value strongly affected by ambiguities associated to renormalons?
\end{itemize}
In this paper we summarize and discuss our
recent results~\cite{Bauer:2011ws,Bali:2013pla,Bali:2013qla,Bali:2014fea,Bali:2014sja}, which
address these questions for the case of the plaquette and the energy of an infinitely heavy quark in the pure gluodynamics approximation to QCD.
Both analyses utilize lattice regularization. Contrary to, e.g., dimensional regulation, lattice regularization
can be defined non-perturbatively. Using a lattice scheme rather than the $\overline{\mathrm{MS}}$ scheme, we can, not only expand observables in perturbation theory, but also evaluate them non-perturbatively. Another advantage of this choice is that it enables
us to use numerical stochastic perturbation
theory~\cite{DRMMOLatt94,DRMMO94,DR0} to obtain perturbative expansion
coefficients. This allows us to realize much higher orders than
would have been possible with diagrammatic techniques.
A disadvantage of the lattice scheme is that, at least in our discretization,
lattice perturbative expansions converge slower than expansions in
the $\overline{\mathrm{MS}}$ coupling. This means that we have to go to comparatively higher
orders to become sensitive to the asymptotic behavior. Many of the results
obtained in a lattice scheme either directly apply to the $\overline{\mathrm{MS}}$
scheme too or can subsequently easily (and in some cases exactly)
be converted into
this scheme.
In our studies we used the Wilson gauge action~\cite{Wilson:1974sk}.
We define the vacuum expectation value of a generic operator $B$ of
engineering dimension zero as
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:ANP}
\langle B\rangle \equiv \langle \Omega |B|\Omega\rangle =\frac{1}{Z}\int\![dU_{x,\mu}]\,e^{-S[U]} B[U]
\end{equation}
with the partition function $Z=\int[dU_{x,\mu}]\,e^{-S[U]}$
and measure $[dU_{x,\mu}]=\prod_{x\in\Lambda_E,\mu}dU_{x,\mu}$.
$|\Omega\rangle$ denotes the vacuum state,
$\Lambda_E$ is a Euclidean spacetime lattice with lattice spacing
$a$ and $U_{x,\mu}\approx e^{iA_{\mu}(x+a/2)}\in\mathrm{SU}(3)$ is a gauge link.
\section{The Plaquette: OPE in perturbation theory}
For the case of the plaquette we have $B \rightarrow P$, where
\begin{equation}
\langle P\rangle=\frac{1}{N^4}\sum_{x\in\Lambda_E}\langle P_x\rangle\,,\quad
P_{x}=1-\frac{1}{36}
\sum_{\mu>\nu}\mathrm{Tr}\left(U_{x,\mu\nu}+U_{x,\mu\nu}^{\dagger}\right)\,,
\end{equation}
and $U_{x,\mu\nu}$ denotes the oriented product of gauge links enclosing an
elementary square (plaquette) in the $\mu$-$\nu$ plane of the lattice.
For details on
the notation and simulation set-up see Ref.~\cite{Bali:2014fea}.
$\langle P\rangle$ will depend on the lattice extent $Na$, the spacing $a$ and
$\alpha =g^2/(4\pi) \equiv \alpha(a^{-1})$ (note that $\alpha$ is the bare lattice coupling
and its natural scale is of order $a^{-1}$). We first compute this expectation value in strict perturbation theory. In other words, we Taylor expand in powers of $g$ {\it before} averaging over the gauge configurations (which we do using NSPT~\cite{DRMMOLatt94,DRMMO94,DR0}).
The outcome is a power series in $\alpha$:
\begin{equation}
\nonumber
\langle P \rangle_{\mathrm{pert}}(N) \equiv \frac{1}{Z}\left.\int\![dU_{x,\mu}]\,e^{-S[U]} P[U]\right|_{\mathrm{NSPT}}
=\sum_{n\geq 0}p_n(N)\alpha^{n+1}\,.
\end{equation}
The dimensionless coefficients $p_n(N)$ are functions of the linear
lattice size $N$. We emphasize that they
do not depend on the lattice spacing $a$ or on the physical
lattice extent $Na$ alone but only on
the ratio $N=(Na)/a$.
We are interested in the large-$N$ (i.e.\ infinite volume)
limit. In this situation
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:scales}
\frac{1}{a} \gg \frac{1}{Na}
\end{equation}
and it makes sense to factorize the contributions of the
different scales within the OPE
framework.
The hard modes, of scale $\sim 1/a$,
determine the Wilson
coefficients, whereas the soft modes, of scale $\sim 1/(Na)$, can be described
by expectation values of local gauge invariant operators. There are no
such operators of dimension two.
The renormalization group invariant definition of the gluon condensate
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:GC}
\langle G^2 \rangle=-\frac{2}{\beta_0}\left\langle\Omega\left| \frac{\beta(\alpha)}{\alpha}
G_{\mu\nu}^cG_{\mu\nu}^c\right|\Omega\right\rangle
=
\left\langle\Omega\left| \left[1+\mathcal{O}(\alpha)\right]\frac{\alpha}{\pi}
G_{\mu\nu}^cG_{\mu\nu}^c\right|\Omega\right\rangle
\end{equation}
is the only local gauge invariant expectation value of an operator of dimension
$a^{-4}$ in pure gluodynamics. In the purely perturbative case discussed here,
this only depends on the soft scale $1/(Na)$, i.e.\ on the lattice
extent.
On dimensional grounds, the perturbative gluon condensate
$\langle G^2 \rangle_{\mathrm{soft}}$ is proportional to
$1/(Na)^4$, and the logarithmic $(Na)$-dependence is encoded
in $\alpha[1/(Na)]$. Therefore,
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:fnnn}
\frac{\pi^2}{36}\,a^4\langle G^2\rangle_{\mathrm{soft}}=
-\frac{1}{N^4}
\sum_{n\geq 0}f_n\alpha^{n+1}\![1/(Na)]\,,
\end{equation}
and the perturbative expansion of the plaquette on a finite
volume of $N^4$ sites can be written as
\begin{equation}
\label{OPEpert}
\langle P \rangle_{\mathrm{pert}} (N)=
P_{\mathrm{pert}}(\alpha)\langle 1 \rangle
+\frac{\pi^2}{36}C_{\mathrm{G}}(\alpha)\,a^4\langle G^2\rangle_{\mathrm{soft}}
+\mathcal{O}\left(\frac{1}{N^6}\right)\,,
\end{equation}
where
\begin{equation}
P_{\mathrm{pert}}(\alpha)=\sum_{n\geq 0}p_n\alpha^{n+1}
\end{equation}
and $p_n$ are the infinite volume coefficients that we
are interested in. The constant pre-factor $\pi^2/36$ is chosen
such that the Wilson coefficient,
which only depends on $\alpha$,
is normalized to unity for $\alpha=0$. It can be expanded in $\alpha$:
\begin{equation}
\label{CG}
C_{\mathrm{G}}(\alpha)=1+\sum_{k\geq 0}c_k\alpha^{k+1}
\,.
\end{equation}
Since our action is proportional to the plaquette $P$, $C_{\mathrm{G}}$ is
fixed by the conformal trace
anomaly~\cite{DiGiacomo:1990gy,DiGiacomo:1989id}:
\begin{equation}
\label{CP}
C^{-1}_{\mathrm{G}}(\alpha)=
-\frac{2\pi\beta(\alpha)}{\beta_0\alpha^2}
=1+\frac{\beta_1}{\beta_0}\frac{\alpha}{4\pi}
+\frac{\beta_2}{\beta_0}\left(\frac{\alpha}{4\pi}\right)^2
+\frac{\beta_3}{\beta_0}\left(\frac{\alpha}{4\pi}\right)^3
+\mathcal{O}(\alpha^4)\,.
\end{equation}
The $\beta$-function coefficients\footnote{We define the $\beta$-function as $\beta(\alpha)=d\alpha/d\ln\mu=-\beta_0/(2\pi)\alpha^2-\beta_1/(8\pi^2)\alpha^3-\cdots$, i.e.\ $\beta_0=11$.} $\beta_j$ are known in the lattice
scheme for $j\leq 3$ (see Eq.~(25) of Ref.~\cite{Bali:2014fea}).
\begin{figure}[t]
\centerline{\includegraphics[width=0.85\textwidth,clip=]{ratio.eps}}
\caption{{The ratios
$p_n/(np_{n-1})$ compared with the leading order (LO),
next-to-leading order
(NLO), NNLO and NNNLO predictions of the
$1/n$-expansion Eq.~\eqref{th:ratio}.
Only the ``$N=\infty$'' extrapolation includes the systematic uncertainties.
We also show finite volume data for $N=28$, and the result from the
alternative $N\rightarrow\infty$ extrapolation including some $1/N^6$
corrections. The symbols have been shifted slightly horizontally.}
\label{n35}}
\end{figure}
Combining Eqs. (\ref{eq:fnnn}), (\ref{OPEpert}) and (\ref{CG}) gives
\begin{align}
\label{PpertOPE}
\langle P \rangle_{\mathrm{pert}}(N)
&=\sum_{n\geq 0}\left[p_n-\frac{f_n(N)}{N^4}\right]\alpha^{n+1}\\\nonumber
&=
\sum_{n\geq 0}p_n\alpha^{n+1}
-\frac{1}{N^4}
\left(1+\sum_{k\geq 0}c_k\alpha^{k+1}(a^{-1})
\right)
\times
\sum_{n\geq 0}f_n\alpha^{n+1}((Na)^{-1})
+\mathcal{O}\left(\frac{1}{N^6}\right)\,,
\end{align}
where $f_n(N)$ is a polynomial in powers of $\ln(N)$.
Fitting this equation to the perturbative lattice results,
the first 35 coefficients $p_n$ were determined
in Ref.~\cite{Bali:2014fea}. The results were confronted
with the expectations from renormalons:
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:thratio1}
p^{\mathrm{latt}}_n \stackrel{n\rightarrow\infty}{=}
N^{\mathrm{latt}}_{P}\,\left(\frac{\beta_0}{2\pi d}\right)^{\!n}
\frac{\Gamma(n+1+db)}{\Gamma(1+db)} \left[
1+\frac{20.08931\ldots}{n+db}+\frac{505\pm 33}{\left(n+db\right) \left(n+db-1\right)}
+
\mathcal{O}\left(\frac{1}{n^3}\right)
\right]
\,,
\end{equation}
\begin{equation}
\label{th:ratio}
\frac{p_n}{np_{n-1}}=\frac{\beta_0}{2\pi d}
\left\{1
+\frac{db}{n}
+\frac{db(1-ds_1)}{n^2}
+\frac{db\left[1-3ds_1+d^2b(s_1+2s_2)\right]}{n^3}+
\mathcal{O}\left(\frac{1}{n^4}\right)
\right\}\,,
\end{equation}
where
$b=\beta_1/(2\beta_0^2)$,
$s_1=(\beta_1^2-\beta_0\beta_2)/(4b\beta_0^4)$ and
$s_2=(\beta_1^3-2\beta_0\beta_1\beta_2+\beta_0^2\beta_3)/(16b^2\beta_0^6)$
are defined so that
\begin{equation}\label{lambdapa}
a=
\frac{1}{\Lambda_{\mathrm{latt}}} \exp\left[-\frac{1}{t}
-b\ln\frac{t}{2}
+s_1 bt-s_2b^2t^2+\cdots\right]
\quad\mathrm{with}\quad t=\frac{\beta_0}{2\pi}\alpha\,.
\end{equation}
In Fig.~\ref{n35} we compare the infinite volume ratios
$p_n/(np_{n-1})$ to the expectation Eq.~\eqref{th:ratio}:
the asymptotic behavior of the perturbative series due to
renormalons is reached around orders $n \sim 27-30$, proving,
for the first time, the existence of the renormalon in the plaquette.
Note that incorporating finite volume effects is compulsory to
see this behavior, since there are no infrared renormalons on a finite lattice.
To parameterize finite size effects we made use of
the purely perturbative OPE Eq.~(\ref{OPEpert}).
The behavior seen in Fig.~\ref{n35}, although computed from
perturbative expansion coefficients, goes beyond the purely perturbative
OPE since it predicts the position of a non-perturbative object
in the Borel plane.
\section{The plaquette: OPE beyond perturbation theory}
Since in NSPT we Taylor expand in powers of $g$ before averaging
over the gauge variables, no
mass gap is generated.
In non-perturbative Monte-Carlo (MC) lattice simulations an additional
scale, $\Lambda_{\mathrm{QCD}} \sim 1/a \, e^{-2\pi/(\beta_0\alpha)}$,
is generated dynamically (see also Eq.~(\ref{lambdapa})).
However, we can always tune $N$ and $\alpha$ such that
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:scalesNP1}
\frac{1}{a} \gg \frac{1}{Na} \gg \Lambda_{\mathrm{QCD}}\,.
\end{equation}
In this small-volume situation we encounter a double expansion in powers of
$a/(Na)$ and $a\Lambda_{\mathrm{QCD}}$ [or, equivalently,
$(Na)\Lambda_{\mathrm{QCD}} \times a/(Na)$]. The construction of the OPE
is completely analogous to that of the previous section
and we obtain\footnote{
In the last equality, we approximate the Wilson coefficients by their
perturbative expansions,
neglecting the possibility of non-perturbative contributions
associated to the hard scale $1/a$. These
would be suppressed by factors $\sim\exp(-2\pi/\alpha)$
and therefore would be sub-leading, relative to the gluon condensate.}
\begin{equation}
\label{OPEMC}
\langle P\rangle_{\mathrm{MC}} =\frac{1}{Z}\left.\int\![dU_{x,\mu}]\,e^{-S[U]} P[U]
\right|_{\mathrm{MC}}
=
P_{\mathrm{pert}}(\alpha)\langle 1 \rangle
+\frac{\pi^2}{36}C_{\mathrm{G}}(\alpha)\,a^4\langle G^2 \rangle_{\mathrm{MC}}
+\mathcal{O}(a^6)\,.
\end{equation}
In the last equality we have factored out the hard scale $1/a$ from the
scales $1/(Na)$ and $\Lambda_{\mathrm{QCD}}$, which are encoded in
$\langle G^2\rangle_{\mathrm{MC}}$. Exploiting the right-most
inequality of Eq.~\eqref{eq:scalesNP1},
we can expand $\langle G^2 \rangle_{\mathrm{MC}}$ as follows:
\begin{equation}
\langle G^2\rangle_{\mathrm{MC}}=\langle G^2 \rangle_{\rm soft}\left\{1+\mathcal{O}[\Lambda_{\mathrm{QCD}}^2 (Na)^2]\right\}
\,.
\end{equation}
Hence, a non-perturbative
small-volume simulation
would yield the same expression as NSPT,
up to non-perturbative corrections that can be made arbitrarily
small by reducing $a$ and therefore
$Na$, keeping $N$ fixed.
In other words, $p_n^{\mathrm{NSPT}}(N)=p_n^{\mathrm{MC}}(N)$ up to
non-perturbative corrections.
We can also consider the limit
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:scalesNP2}
\frac{1}{a} \gg \Lambda_{\mathrm{QCD}} \gg \frac{1}{Na} \,.
\end{equation}
This is the standard situation realized in non-perturbative lattice simulations.
Again the OPE can be constructed as in the previous section, Eq.~\eqref{OPEMC}
holds, and the $p_n$- and $c_n$-values are still the same.
The difference is that now
\begin{equation}
\langle G^2 \rangle_{\mathrm{MC}}=
\langle G^2 \rangle_{\mathrm{NP}}\left[1+\mathcal{O}\left(\frac{1}{\Lambda_{\mathrm{QCD}}^2 (Na)^2}\right)
\right]
\,,
\end{equation}
where $\langle G^2\rangle_{\mathrm{NP}} \sim \Lambda_{\mathrm{QCD}}^4$ is the so-called
non-perturbative gluon condensate introduced
in Ref.~\cite{Vainshtein:1978wd}. From now on we will call
this quantity simply the ``gluon condensate'' $\langle G^2\rangle$.
We are now in the position
\begin{itemize}
\item
to determine the gluon condensate and
\item
to check the validity of the OPE (at low orders in the $a^2$ scale
expansion) for the case of the plaquette.
\end{itemize}
In order to do so we proceed as follows.
The perturbative series is divergent due
to renormalons and other, sub-leading, instabilities.\footnote{
The leading renormalon is located at $u=d/2=2$ in the Borel plane,
while the first instanton-anti-instanton contribution occurs at
$u=\beta_0=11N_c/3=11\gg 2$.}
This makes any determination of $\langle G^2 \rangle$ ambiguous,
unless we define precisely how to truncate or how to
approximate the perturbative series. A reasonable definition
that is consistent with
$\langle G^2 \rangle \sim \Lambda_{\mathrm{QCD}}^4$ can only be given if the asymptotic
behavior of the perturbative series is under control.
This has only been achieved recently~\cite{Bali:2014fea},
where the perturbative expansion of the plaquette was
computed up to $\mathcal{O}(\alpha^{35})$, see the
previous section. The observed
asymptotic behavior was in full compliance with renormalon
expectations, with successive contributions starting
to diverge for orders around $\alpha^{27}$--$\alpha^{30}$ within
the range of couplings $\alpha$ typically employed in present-day
lattice simulations.
Extracting the gluon condensate from the
average plaquette was
pioneered in Refs.~\cite{Di Giacomo:1981wt,Kripfganz:1981ri,DiGiacomo:1981dp,Ilgenfritz:1982yx} and
many attempts followed during the next decades,
see, e.g., Refs.~\cite{Alles:1993dn,DiRenzo:1994sy,Ji:1995fe,DiRenzo:1995qc,Burgio:1997hc,Horsley:2001uy,Rakow:2005yn,Meurice:2006cr,Lee:2010hd,Horsley:2012ra}.
These suffered from insufficiently high perturbative orders and,
in some cases, also finite volume
effects. The failure to make contact to the asymptotic regime
prevented a reliable lattice determination of $\langle G^2\rangle$.
This problem was solved in Ref.~\cite{Bali:2014sja}, which we now summarize.
Truncating the infinite sum at the order
of the minimal contribution provides one definition of the perturbative series.
Varying the truncation order will result in changes of
size $\Lambda_{\mathrm{QCD}}^4a^4$, where the dimension $d=4$ is fixed
by that of the gluon condensate. We
approximate the asymptotic series by the truncated sum
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:truncate}
S_P(\alpha)\equiv S_{n_0}(\alpha)\,,\quad\mathrm{where}\quad S_n(\alpha)=\sum_{j=0}^{n}p_j\alpha^{j+1}\,.
\end{equation}
$n_0\equiv n_0(\alpha)$ is the order for which $p_{n_0}\alpha^{{n_0}+1}$ is minimal.
We then obtain the gluon condensate from the relation
\begin{equation}
\langle G^2 \rangle=
\frac{36C_{\mathrm{G}}^{-1}(\alpha)}{\pi^2a^{4}(\alpha)}\left[\langle P \rangle_{\mathrm{MC}}(\alpha)-S_P(\alpha)\right]+
\mathcal{O}(a^2\Lambda_{\mathrm{QCD}}^2)
\,.
\label{eq:G2}
\end{equation}
$C^{-1}_{\mathrm{G}}(\alpha)$ is proportional to the
$\beta$-function, and the first few terms are known, see Eq.~(\ref{CP}).
The corrections to
$C_{\mathrm{G}}=1$ are small. However, the $\mathcal{O}(\alpha^2)$ and
$\mathcal{O}(\alpha^3)$ terms are of similar sizes. We will
account for this uncertainty in our error budget.
Following Eq.~(\ref{eq:G2}), we subtract the
truncated sum $S_P(\alpha)$ calculated from the coefficients
$p_n$ of Ref.~\cite{Bali:2014fea} from the MC data on $\langle P \rangle_{\mathrm{MC}}(\alpha)$
of Ref.~\cite{Boyd:1996bx} in the range $\beta \in [5.8,6.65]$ ($\beta=6/g^2$),
where $a(\beta)$ is given by the phenomenological parametrization of
Ref.~\cite{Necco:2001xg}
($x=\beta-6$)
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:Necco}
a=r_0\exp\left(-1.6804-1.7331x+0.7849x^2-0.4428x^3\right)\,,
\end{equation}
where $r_0\approx 0.5\,$fm.
This corresponds to
$(a/r_0)^4 \in [3.1\times 10^{-5},5.5\times 10^{-3}]$, covering more than
two orders of magnitude.
\begin{figure}
\includegraphics[width=.47\textwidth,clip=]{condensate.eps}\hspace*{.02\textwidth}
\includegraphics[width=.49\textwidth,clip=]{slope.eps}
\caption{\label{fig:PlaqMC}
Left panel: Eq.~(\protect\ref{eq:G2}) evaluated
using the $N=16$ and $N=32$ MC data
of Ref.~\protect\cite{Boyd:1996bx}. The $N=32$ outer error bars include
the error of $S_P(\alpha)$. The error band is our prediction
for $\langle O_G \rangle$, Eq.~(\protect\ref{eq:G2final}).\newline
Right panel: Eq.~(\protect\ref{eq:G2}) times $a^4$ vs.\ $a^4(\alpha)/r_0^4$
from Eq.~(\protect\ref{eq:Necco}). The linear fit
with slope Eq.~(\protect\ref{eq:G2final}) is to the $a^4< 0.0013\,r_0^4$
points only.}
\end{figure}
Multiplying this difference by
$36r_0^4/(\pi^2 C_{\mathrm{G}}a^4)$ gives $r_0^4\langle O_{\mathrm{G}}\rangle$
plus higher order non-perturbative terms.
We show this combination in the left panel of
Fig.~\ref{fig:PlaqMC}. The smaller error bars represent the
errors of the MC data, the outer error bars (not plotted
for $N=16$) the
total uncertainty, including that of $S_P$. This part of
the error is correlated between different $\beta$-values (see the discussion in Ref~\cite{Bali:2014sja}).
The MC data
were obtained on volumes $N^4=16^4$ and $N^4=32^4$.
Towards large $\beta$-values the physical volumes
$[Na(\beta)]^4$
will become small, resulting in transitions
into the deconfined phase.
For $\beta<6.3$ we find no significant differences
between the $N=16$ and $N=32$ results. In the analysis
we restrict ourselves to the more precise
$N=32$ data and, to keep finite size effects under control,
to $\beta\leq 6.65$. We also
limit ourselves to $\beta\geq 5.8$ to avoid large
$\mathcal{O}(a^2)$ corrections.
At very large $\beta$-values not only does the parametrization Eq.~(\ref{eq:Necco})
break down but obtaining meaningful results becomes challenging
numerically: the individual errors both of $\langle P\rangle_{\mathrm{MC}}(\alpha)$
and of $S_P(\alpha)$ somewhat decrease with increasing $\beta$.
However, there are strong cancellations between these two terms, in
particular at large $\beta$-values, since this difference
decreases with $a^{-4}
\sim\Lambda_{\mathrm{latt}}^4\exp(16\pi^2\beta/33)$ on dimensional
grounds while $\langle P\rangle_{\mathrm{MC}}$ depends only logarithmically
on $a$.
The data in the left panel of Fig.~\ref{fig:PlaqMC} show an approximately
constant behavior.\footnote{Note that
$n_0$ increases from 26 to 27 at $\beta=5.85$, from
27 to 28 at $\beta=6.1$ and from 28 to 29
at $\beta=6.55$. This quantization of $n_0$ explains the visible jump
at $\beta=6.1$.} This indicates
that, after subtracting
$S_P(\alpha)$ from the corresponding MC values
$\langle P \rangle_{\mathrm{MC}}(\alpha)$, the remainder scales like $a^4$.
This can be seen more explicitly in the right panel
of Fig.~\ref{fig:PlaqMC}, where
we plot this difference in lattice units against $a^4$.
The result is consistent with a linear behavior
but a small curvature seems to be present that can be parametrized as
an $a^6$-correction.
The right-most point ($\beta=5.8$) corresponds to $a^{-1}\simeq
1.45$~GeV while $\beta=6.65$ corresponds to
$a^{-1}\simeq 5.3$~GeV. Note that
$a^2$-terms are clearly ruled out.
We now determine the gluon condensate.
We obtain the central value and its statistical error
$\langle G^2\rangle=3.177(36)r_0^{-4}$
from averaging the $N=32$ data for $6.0\leq\beta\leq 6.65$.
We now estimate the systematic uncertainties.
Different infinite volume extrapolations of
the $p_n(N)$ data~\cite{Bali:2014fea}
result in changes of the prediction of about $6\%$.
Another $6\%$ error is due to including an $a^6$-term or not
and varying the fit range.
Next there is a scale error of
about 2.5\%, translating $a^4$ into units of $r_0$.
The uncertainty of the perturbatively determined
Wilson coefficient $C_{\mathrm{G}}$ is of a similar size.
This is estimated as the difference between
evaluating Eq.~(\ref{CP}) to $\mathcal{O}(\alpha^2)$
and to $\mathcal{O}(\alpha^3)$.
Adding all these sources of uncertainty in quadrature
and using the pure gluodynamics value~\cite{Capitani:1998mq}
$\Lambda_{\overline{\mathrm{MS}}}=0.602(48)r_0^{-1}$
yields
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:G2final}
\langle G^2 \rangle=3.18(29)r_0^{-4}=24.2(8.0)\Lambda_{\overline{\mathrm{MS}}}^4\,.
\end{equation}
The gluon condensate Eq.~(\ref{eq:GC}) is
independent of the renormalization scale.
However, $\langle G^2\rangle$ was obtained employing one
particular prescription in terms of the observable
and our choice of how to truncate
the perturbative series within a given renormalization scheme.
Different (reasonable) prescriptions can in principle
give different results. One may for instance choose to truncate
the sum at orders $n_0(\alpha) \pm \sqrt{n_0(\alpha)}$ and
the result would still scale like $\Lambda_{\mathrm{QCD}}^4$.
We estimated this intrinsic ambiguity of the definition of the
gluon condensate in Ref.~\cite{Bali:2014fea}
as $\delta\langle G^2\rangle=
36/(\pi^2C_{\mathrm{G}}a^4)\,\sqrt{n_0}p_{n_0}\alpha^{n_0+1}$, i.e.\
as $\sqrt{n_0(\alpha)}$
times the contribution of the minimal term:
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:prescript}
\delta\langle G^2 \rangle=27(11)\Lambda_{\overline{\mathrm{MS}}}^4\,.
\end{equation}
Up to $1/n_0$-corrections this definition is scheme- and
scale-independent and corresponds
to the (ambiguous) imaginary part of the Borel integral times
$\sqrt{2/\pi}$.
In QCD with sea quarks
the OPE of the average plaquette or of the Adler function
will receive additional contributions from the chiral condensate.
For instance $\langle G^2\rangle$ needs to be redefined,
adding terms
$\propto\langle \gamma_m(\alpha)m\bar\psi\psi\rangle$~\cite{Tarrach:1981bi,Bali:2013esa}.
Due to this and the problem of setting a physical scale
in pure gluodynamics, it is difficult to assess the precise
numerical impact
of including sea quarks onto our estimates
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:G2GeV}
\langle G^2 \rangle\simeq 0.077\, \mathrm{GeV}^4\,,
\quad
\delta\langle G^2 \rangle\simeq 0.087\, \mathrm{GeV}^4\,,
\end{equation}
which we obtain using $r_0\simeq 0.5$~fm~\cite{Sommer:1993ce}.
While the systematics of applying
Eqs.~(\ref{eq:G2final})--(\ref{eq:prescript})
to full QCD are unknown, our main observations
should still extend to this case.
We remark that our prediction of the gluon condensate
Eq.~(\ref{eq:G2GeV}) is significantly bigger than values
obtained in one- and two-loop sum rule analyses,
ranging from
0.01~GeV${}^4$~\cite{Vainshtein:1978wd,Ioffe:2002be} up
to 0.02~GeV${}^4$~\cite{Broadhurst:1994qj,Narison:2011xe}.
However, these numbers were not extracted in the
asymptotic regime, which for a $d=4$ renormalon
in the $\overline{\mathrm{MS}}$ scheme we expect to set in
at orders $n \gtrsim 7$.
Moreover, we remark that in schemes
without a hard ultraviolet cut-off, like dimensional regularization,
the extraction of $\langle G^2\rangle$ can become obscured by the
possibility of ultraviolet
renormalons. Independent of these considerations,
all these values are smaller than the intrinsic
prescription dependence Eq.~(\ref{eq:prescript}).
\begin{figure}
\includegraphics[width=.8\textwidth,clip=]{slope5.eps}
\caption{Differences $\langle P\rangle_{\mathrm{MC}}(\alpha)-S_n(\alpha)$
between MC data and sums truncated
at orders $\alpha^{n+1}$ ($S_{-1}=0$)
vs.\ $a(\alpha)/r_0$. The lines $\propto a^j$ are drawn
to guide the eye.
\label{fig:a2}}
\end{figure}
Our analysis confirms the validity of the OPE beyond perturbation theory
for the case of the plaquette. Our $a^4$-scaling clearly
disfavors suggestions about the existence of
dimension two condensates beyond the standard OPE
framework~\cite{Burgio:1997hc,Chetyrkin:1998yr,Gubarev:2000nz,RuizArriola:2006gq,Andreev:2006vy}.
In fact we can also explain why
an $a^2$-contribution to the plaquette was found in Ref.~\cite{Burgio:1997hc}.
In the log-log plot of Fig.~\ref{fig:a2} we subtract sums $S_n$, truncated at
different fixed orders $\alpha^{n+1}$, from $\langle P\rangle_{\mathrm{MC}}$.
The scaling continuously moves from $\sim a^0$ at $\mathcal{O}(\alpha^0)$ to $\sim a^4$ around
$\mathcal{O}(\alpha^{30})$. Note that truncating at an
$\alpha$-independent fixed order is inconsistent, explaining why in the figure
we never exactly obtain an $a^4$-slope.
For $n\sim 9$ we reproduce the $a^2$-scaling reported
in Ref.~\cite{Burgio:1997hc} for a fixed order truncation
at $n=7$.
In view of Fig.~\ref{fig:a2}, we conclude that
the observation of this scaling power was accidental.
\section{The binding energy of HQET: OPE in perturbation theory}
The OPE of the plaquette is analogous to the OPE of the vacuum
polarization (or the Adler function) in position space.
As we already mentioned, the OPE concept of the factorization of scales can
also be applied to more general kinematical settings (in particular
to cases where some scales are defined in Minkowski spacetime).
A prominent example is heavy quark effective theory (HQET). In this case
the term $\langle O_1\rangle$ of Eq.~\eqref{eq:ope1}
is replaced by a non-perturbative quantity, the so-called
heavy quark binding energy $\overline{\Lambda}$, that cannot be represented
as an expectation value of a local gauge invariant operator.
We consider the self-energy of a heavy quark in the infinite mass
limit (in other words, the self-energy of a static source in the triplet
representation, for other color representations see Ref.~\cite{Bali:2013pla}),
that is closely related to $\overline{\Lambda}$.
We compute this quantity in close analogy to the case of the plaquette
in lattice regularization.
First we compute the self-energy of the static quark in perturbation theory
(again using NSPT). We obtain this from the Polyakov loop in an
asymmetric volume $N_S^3N_Ta^4$ of
spatial and temporal extents $N_Sa$ and $N_Ta$, respectively:
\begin{equation}
L(N_S,N_T)=\frac{1}{N_S^3}\sum_{\mathbf{x}}\frac{1}{3}
\mathrm{Tr}\left[\prod_{x_4/a=0}^{N_T-1}U_{x,4}\right]\,,
\end{equation}
or, more specifically, from its logarithm
\begin{equation}
P(N_S,N_T)=-\frac{\ln\langle L(N_S,N_T)\rangle_{\mathrm{pert}}}{a N_T}
=
\sum_{n\geq 0}c_n(N_S,N_T)\alpha^{n+1}
\,.
\end{equation}
Again, $U_{x,\mu}$ denotes a gauge link and $x=(\mathbf{x},x_4)\in\Lambda_E$
are Euclidean lattice points.
We define the energy of a static source and its perturbative
expansion in a finite spatial volume,
\begin{equation}
\delta m(N_S)=\lim_{N_T\rightarrow\infty}P(N_S,N_T)=\frac{1}{a}
\sum_{n\geq 0}c_n(N_S)\alpha^{n+1}\!(1/a)\,,
\quad \mathrm{where}
\quad
c_n(N_S)=\lim_{N_T\rightarrow\infty}c_n(N_S,N_T)
\,,
\end{equation}
and its infinite volume limit
\begin{equation}
\label{deltam}
\delta m=\lim_{N_S,N_T\rightarrow\infty}P(N_S,N_T)=\frac{1}{a}\sum_{n= 0}^{\infty}c_n\alpha^{n+1}\!(1/a)\quad\mathrm{with}\quad
c_n=\lim_{N_S\rightarrow\infty}c_n(N_S)
\,.
\end{equation}
We now construct the purely perturbative OPE in a finite volume.
For large $N_S$, we can write [$a^{-1} \gg (N_Sa)^{-1}$]:
\begin{align}
\delta m(N_S)&=\frac{1}{a}\sum_{n\geq 0}^{\infty}\left(c_n-\frac{f_n(N_S)}{N_S}\right)\alpha^{n+1}\!(1/a)+\mathcal{O}{\left(\frac{1}{N_S^2}\right)}\\\nonumber&=
\frac{1}{a}\sum_{n\geq 0}c_n\alpha^{n+1}\!\!\left(1/a\right)-
\frac{1}{N_Sa}\sum_{n\geq 0}f_n\alpha^{n+1}\!\!\left[1/(N_Sa)\right]
+\mathcal{O}{\left(\frac{1}{N_S^2}\right)}
\,.
\end{align}
Note the similarity between this equation and Eq.~(\ref{PpertOPE}).
$f_n(N_S)=\sum_{j=0}^{n}f_n^{(j)}\ln^j(N_S)$ is again a polynomial
in powers of $\ln(N_S)$, and the $f_n^{(j)}$ are known combinations
of $\beta$-function coefficients and lower order infinite volume
expansion coefficients $c_k$, $k<n$. The main difference with respect to
the gluon condensate is that
the power correction scales like $1/N_S$,
instead of $1/N_S^4$, and that now the Wilson coefficient is trivial.
This $1/N_S$ scaling also means that the renormalon behavior will show up
at lower orders $n$ of the perturbative expansion. Fitting the
$c_n(N_S)$ data to this equation, the first 20 $c_n$ coefficients
were determined in
Refs.~\cite{Bauer:2011ws,Bali:2013pla,Bali:2013qla}
and confronted with the renormalon expectations:\footnote{Here we
deviate from Refs.~\cite{Bauer:2011ws,Bali:2013pla,Bali:2013qla}
in the definition of the constant $s_2$, see Eq.~\eqref{lambdapa}.}
\begin{equation}
c_n\stackrel{n\rightarrow\infty}{=} N_m\,\left(\frac{\beta_0}{2\pi}\right)^n
\,\frac{\Gamma(n+1+b)}{
\Gamma(1+b)}
\left[
1+\frac{bs_1}{(n+b)}+\frac{b^2\left(s_1^2/2-s_2\right)}{(n+b)(n+b-1)}+ \cdots
\right]\,.
\end{equation}
In the lattice scheme the numerical values
of the above coefficients read $bs_1=1.36095381(11)$ and
$b^2(s_1^2/2-s_2)=5.34(51)$. As expected, the
above expansion converges much faster in $1/n$ than
Eq.~\eqref{eq:thratio1}. Calculating the ratio of subsequent
perturbative coefficients gives
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:ratpol}
\frac{c_{n}}{c_{n-1}}\frac{1}{n} =
\frac{\beta_0}{2\pi}
\left\{1 +\frac{b}{ n} - \frac{b s_1}{n^2}
+\frac{1}{n^3}
\left[2b^2s_2+b(b-1)s_1
\right]
+\mathcal{O}\left(\frac{1}{n^4}\right)
\right\}\,.
\end{equation}
We remark that Eq.~\eqref{th:ratio} includes the effect of the
non-trivial Wilson coefficient $C_{\mathrm{G}}$. Therefore, just setting $d=1$ in that equation does not result in Eq.~(\ref{eq:ratpol}) above.
In Fig. \ref{fig:cnratio} we compare the data to Eq.~\eqref{eq:ratpol}
for two different lattice discretizations of the covariant
temporal derivative, which amounts to ``smearing'' or not smearing
temporal gauge links. This should not affect
the infrared behavior and, indeed, beyond the first few orders
the difference becomes invisible. The asymptotic behavior of the perturbative
series due to the renormalon is confirmed in full glory
for $n \gtrsim 8$, proving the existence of the renormalon behavior
in QCD beyond any reasonable doubt. Again the incorporation of finite volume
effects was decisive to obtain this result.
\begin{figure}
\includegraphics[width=0.8\textwidth]{ratios8.eps}
\caption{Ratios~$c_n/(nc_{n-1})$ of the unsmeared (squares) and smeared
(circles) triplet static self-energy coefficients $c_n$
in comparison to the theoretical prediction
Eq.~(\protect\ref{eq:ratpol}), truncated at different
orders in $1/n$. In the inset we magnify the asymptotic region.
\label{fig:cnratio}
}
\end{figure}
\section{The binding energy of HQET: OPE beyond perturbation theory}
The methods used for the gluon condensate can also
be applied to other observables.
We now consider the non-perturbative evaluation
of the energy of a static-light meson on the lattice
and its OPE:
\begin{equation}
E_{\mathrm{MC}}(\alpha)=E_{\mathrm{pert}}(\alpha)+\overline{\Lambda}+\mathcal{O}(a\Lambda_{\mathrm{QCD}}^2)\,.
\end{equation}
$\overline{\Lambda}$ is the non-perturbative binding energy and $E_{\mathrm{pert}}(\alpha)=\delta m(\alpha)$
is the self-energy of the static source in perturbation theory, i.e. Eq.~(\ref{deltam}).
In HQET the mass of the $B$ meson is given as
$m_B=m_{b,\mathrm{pert}}+\overline{\Lambda}+\mathcal{O}(1/m_b)$,
where $m_{b,\mathrm{pert}}$ is the $b$-quark pole mass
$m_b^{\mathrm{OS}}$, which suffers from the same renormalon ambiguity as $\delta m$ \cite{Bigi:1994em,Beneke:1994sw,Neubert:1994wq}.
The perturbative expansion of $a\delta m(\alpha)=\sum_n c_n\alpha^{n+1}$
was obtained in Refs.~\cite{Bauer:2011ws,Bali:2013pla}
up to $\mathcal{O}(\alpha^{20})$, see the previous section.
Its intrinsic ambiguity
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:ambigu}
\delta\overline{\Lambda}=\sqrt{n_0}c_{n_0}\alpha^{n_0+1}=0.748(42)\Lambda_{\overline{\mathrm{MS}}}=0.450(44)r_0^{-1}
\end{equation}
was computed in Refs.~\cite{Bali:2013pla,Bali:2013qla}.
MC data for the ground state energy $E_{\mathrm{MC}}$ of a static-light meson
with the Wilson action can be found
in Refs.~\cite{Duncan:1994uq,Allton:1994tt,Ewing:1995ih}.
\begin{figure}
\includegraphics[width=.8\textwidth,clip=]{slopestaticnew.eps}
\caption{$a\overline{\Lambda}=aE_{\mathrm{MC}}-aS_{\delta m}$ vs. $a/r_0$. The
sum $aS_{\delta m}$ Eq.~(\protect\ref{eq:truncsum})
was also converted into the $\overline{\mathrm{MS}}$ scheme at
two ($\overline{\mathrm{MS}}_2$) and three ($\overline{\mathrm{MS}}_3$) loops and truncated at
the respective minimal orders. The curves are fits to
$\overline{\Lambda} a+c a^2/r_0^2$.
\label{fig:lambdabar}}
\end{figure}
Truncating the infinite sum in $\delta m$ at the order
of the minimal contribution provides one definition of the perturbative series. As we did for the plaquette,
we approximate the asymptotic series by the truncated sum
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:truncsum}
S_{\delta m}(\alpha)\equiv \frac{1}{a}\sum_{j=0}^{n_0(\alpha)}c_j\alpha^{j+1}\,,
\end{equation}
where
$n_0\equiv n_0(\alpha)$ is the order for which $c_{n_0}\alpha^{{n_0}+1}$ is minimal.
While for the
gluon condensate we expected an $a^4$-scaling (see the right
panel of Fig.~\ref{fig:PlaqMC}),
for $a\overline{\Lambda}=aE_{\mathrm{MC}}-aS_{\delta m}(\alpha)$ we expect a scaling linear in $a$.
Comforting enough this is what we find, up
to the expected $a\mathcal{O}(a\Lambda_{\mathrm{QCD}}^2)$ discretization corrections,
see Fig.~\ref{fig:lambdabar}.
Subtracting the partial sum truncated at orders $n_0(\alpha)= 6$
from the $\beta\in[5.9,6.4]$
data, we obtain $\overline{\Lambda}= 1.55(8) r_0^{-1}$
from such a linear plus quadratic fit, where
we only give the statistical uncertainty.
The errors of the perturbative coefficients are all
tiny, which allows us to transform
the expansion $a\delta m(\alpha)$
into $\overline{\mathrm{MS}}$-like schemes and to compute $\overline{\Lambda}$ accordingly.
We define the schemes $\overline{\mathrm{MS}}_2$ and $\overline{\mathrm{MS}}_3$ by truncating
$\alpha_{\overline{\mathrm{MS}}}(a^{-1})=\alpha(1+d_1\alpha+d_2\alpha^2+\ldots)$ exactly at
$\mathcal{O}(\alpha^3)$ and
$\mathcal{O}(\alpha^4)$, respectively. The $d_j$
are known for $j\leq 3$~\cite{Bali:2013pla,Bali:2013qla}.
We typically find $n_0^{\overline{\mathrm{MS}}_i}(\alpha_{\overline{\mathrm{MS}}_i})=2, 3$
and obtain $\overline{\Lambda} \sim 2.17(8) r_0^{-1}$
and $\overline{\Lambda} \sim 1.89(8) r_0^{-1}$,
respectively, see Fig.~\ref{fig:lambdabar}.
We conclude that the changes due to these resummations are
indeed of the size
$\delta\overline{\Lambda}\sim 0.5 r_0^{-1}$,
adding confidence that our definition of the
ambiguity Eq.~\eqref{eq:ambigu} is neither a gross overestimate nor an underestimate.
For the plaquette, where we expect $n_0^{\overline{\mathrm{MS}}} \sim 7$,
we cannot carry out a similar analysis,
due to the extremely high precision that is required
to resolve the differences
between $S_P(\alpha)$ and $\langle P \rangle_{\mathrm{MC}}(\alpha)$, which
largely cancel in Eq.~(\ref{eq:G2}).
\section{Conclusions}
For the first time ever, perturbative expansions at orders
where the asymptotic regime is reached have been obtained and subtracted
from non-perturbative Monte Carlo data of the static-light meson mass
and of the plaquette, thereby validating the OPE for these cases
beyond perturbation
theory. The scaling of the latter difference with the lattice spacing
confirms the dimension $d=4$. Dimension $d<4$ slopes appear only
when subtracting the perturbative series truncated at fixed
pre-asymptotic orders. Therefore, we interpret the lower dimensional ``condensates'' discussed in Ref.~\cite{Chetyrkin:1998yr} as
approximate parametrizations of unaccounted perturbative effects, i.e.\ of the short-distance behavior. These will be observable-dependent,
unlike the non-perturbative gluon condensate. Such simplified
parametrizations introduce unquantifiable errors and, therefore, are of limited phenomenological use. As we have demonstrated above
(see Fig.~\ref{fig:a2}), even the
effective dimension of such a ``condensate'' varies when
truncating a perturbative series at different orders. In
Refs.~\cite{Gubarev:2000nz,RuizArriola:2006gq,Andreev:2006vy} various analyses, based on models such as string/gauge duality
or Regge models, have been made claiming the existence of non-perturbative dimension two condensates. Our results
strongly suggest that there may be flaws in these derivations.
We observe that $\overline{\Lambda}$ and $\langle G^2\rangle$ do not
depend on the lattice spacing (i.e.\ on the
renormalization scale). In other words, they are renormalization
group invariant quantities, as expected. This is coherent with the
interpretation of these quantities to be of order $\Lambda_{\mathrm{QCD}}$ and $\Lambda_{\mathrm{QCD}}^4$,
respectively. However, the values of
$\overline{\Lambda}$ and $\langle G^2\rangle$
will depend on the
details of how the divergent perturbative series is truncated or estimated
(and therefore implicitly also on the scheme used in the perturbative
expansion), as well as on the observable used as an input in the determination.
We have obtained an accurate value of
the gluon condensate in SU(3) gluodynamics, Eq.~(\ref{eq:G2final}).
It is of a similar size as the intrinsic
difference, Eq.~(\ref{eq:prescript}), between
(reasonable) subtraction prescriptions. This result contradicts the
implicit assumption of sum rule analyses that the renormalon ambiguity is
much smaller than leading non-perturbative corrections.
The value of the gluon condensate obtained with sum rules
can vary significantly due to this intrinsic
ambiguity if determined using different
prescriptions or truncating at different orders in perturbation theory.
Clearly, the impact of this, e.g., on determinations
of $\alpha_s$ from $\tau$-decays or from lattice simulations needs to be
assessed carefully.
As already mentioned in the previous paragraph,
due to the non-convergent nature of the perturbative series,
the binding energy $\overline{\Lambda}$
and the gluon condensate $\langle G^2\rangle$
are in principle
ill-defined quantities. The intrinsic ambiguity of their definition
can, however, be estimated.
The ambiguity of the HQET binding energy
$\delta \overline{\Lambda}=0.75(4)\Lambda_{\overline{\mathrm{MS}}}$ as well as the ambiguity
$\delta\langle G^2\rangle=27(11)\Lambda_{\overline{\mathrm{MS}}}^4$
of the non-perturbative
gluon condensate are scale- and renormalization-scheme independent, at
least up to $1/n_0$-corrections, where $n_0$ is the order of
the minimal term of the perturbative series.
In the first case this ambiguity is significantly
smaller than $\overline{\Lambda}\simeq 2.6\Lambda_{\overline{\mathrm{MS}}}$.
In the second case the ambiguity is larger
than values typically quoted for $\langle G^2\rangle$,
including our result $\langle G^2\rangle \simeq 24\Lambda_{\overline{\mathrm{MS}}}^4$.
The size of $\delta \langle G^2\rangle\gtrsim\langle G^2\rangle$
means that, at least in pure gluodynamics,\footnote{Although our
computations were performed for $N_f=0$, we would not expect the
situation to be qualitatively different including sea quarks.}
$\langle G^2\rangle$ should not be used to estimate the magnitude
of unknown non-perturbative corrections. Instead,
the ambiguity $\delta \langle G^2\rangle$ should be used
for this purpose. An exception to this rule are situations
where the renormalon ambiguities cancel exactly or are small.
For instance, the perturbative expansion of a difference
between two observables $\langle B_2\rangle-\langle B_1\rangle$
that receive contributions $\propto C_{B_j}\langle G^2\rangle/Q^4$
with a relative normalization such that $C_{B_1}=C_{B_2}+\mathcal{O}(\alpha)$
will be partially blind to the associated $d=4$ infrared
renormalon if the $\langle B_j\rangle$ are expanded
at the same scale, in the same renormalization scheme and
the same method is used to truncate
both perturbative series.
\begin{theacknowledgments}
This work was supported
in part by the Spanish grants FPA2010-16963 and FPA2011-25948, the Catalan grant
SGR2014-1450 and the German DFG SFB/TRR-55.
\end{theacknowledgments}
\bibliographystyle{aipproc}
|
\section{Introduction}
Topological properties of a locally convex space (lcs) $E$ endowed with the weak topology
$\sigma(E,E')$, denoted by $E_w$ for short, are of great importance and have been intensively
studied from many years (see \cite{kak,bonet} and references therein).
Corson \cite{Corson} started a systematic study of certain topological properties
of the weak topology of Banach spaces. It is well known that a Banach space $E$ in
the weak topology is metrizable if and only if $E$ is finite-dimensional. On the other hand,
various topological properties generalizing metrizability have been studied intensively by
topologists and analysts. Among the others let us mention the
first countability, Fr\'{e}chet--Urysohn property, sequentiality, $k$-space property, and countable
tightness (see \cite{Eng,kak}). It is well known that
\[
\xymatrix{
\mbox{metric} \ar@{=>}[r] & \mbox{first} \atop \mbox{countably} \ar@{=>}[r] & \mbox{Fr\'{e}chet--} \atop \mbox{Urysohn} \ar@{=>}[r] & \mbox{sequential} \ar@{=>}[r] & }
\left\{
\begin{split}
& \mbox{$k$-space} \\
& {\mbox{countable}\mbox{ tight}}
\end{split} \right. ,
\]
and none of these implications can be reversed. Recall the following classical
\begin{theorem}[Kaplansky] \label{kaplansky}
If $E$ is a metrizable lcs, $E_w$ has countable tight.
\end{theorem}
The Kaplansky theorem can be strengthened by using other sequential concepts which are of great importance for the study of function spaces (see \cite{Arhangel,KocScheep}).
Following Arhangel'skii \cite[II.2]{Arhangel}, we say that a topological space $X$ has {\em countable fan tightness at a point } $x\in X$ if for each sets $A_n\subset X$, $n\in\NN$, with $x\in \bigcap_{n\in\NN} \overline{A_n}$ there are finite sets $F_n\subset A_n$, $n\in\NN$, such that $x\in \overline{\cup_{n\in\NN} F_n}$; $X$ has {\em countable fan tightness} if $X$ has countable fan tightness at each point $x\in X$. Clearly, if $X$ has countable fan tightness, then $X$ also has countable tightness.
Pytkeev \cite{Pyt} proved that every sequential space satisfies the following property, now known as the Pytkeev property, which is stronger than
having countable tightness: A topological space $X$ has the {\em Pytkeev property} if for any sets $A\subset X$ and each $x\in \overline{A}\setminus A$, there are infinite subsets $A_1, A_2, \dots $ of $A$ such that each neighborhood of $x$ contains some $A_n$.
A topological space $X$ has the {\em Reznichenko property} (or is a {\em weakly Fr\'{e}chet--Urysohn} space) if $x\in \overline{A}\setminus A$ and $A\subset X$ imply the existence of a countable infinite disjoint family $\Nn$ of finite subsets of $A$ such that for every neighborhood $U$ of $x$ the family $\{ N\in\Nn : N\cap U=\emptyset\}$ is finite. It is known that
\[
\xymatrix{
\mbox{sequential} \ar@{=>}[r] & \mbox{Pytkeev} \ar@{=>}[r] & \mbox{Reznichenko} \ar@{=>}[r] & {\mbox{countable}\atop\mbox{ tight}} },
\]
and none of these implications is reversible (see \cite{malyhin,Pyt}).
For a Tychonoff topological space $X$ we denote by $C_c(X)$ and $C_p(X)$ the space of all continuous real-valued functions on $X$ endowed with the compact-open topology and the topology of pointwise convergence, respectively. If $X$ is a $\sigma$-compact space, then $C_{p}(X)$ has countable fan tightness by \cite[II.2.2]{Arhangel} and has the Reznichenko property by \cite[Theorem 19]{KocScheep}. If $E$ is a metrizable lcs, then $X:=(E',\sigma(E',E))$ is $\sigma$-compact by the Alaoglu--Bourbaki theorem. Since $E_w$ embeds into $C_p(X)$, we notice the following generalization of the Kaplansky theorem.
\begin{theorem}\label{t:Weak-Fan-tight}
Let $E$ be a metrizable lcs (in particular, a Banach space). Then $E_w$ has countable fan tightness and the Reznichenko property.
\end{theorem}
On the other hand, infinite dimensional Banach spaces in the weak topology are never $k$-spaces.
\begin{theorem}[\cite{S-W}] \label{t:Weak-k-space}
If $E$ is a Banach space, then $E_w$ is a $k$-space (in particular, sequential) if and only if $E$ is finite dimensional.
\end{theorem}
We prove another result of this type having in mind that the concepts of being a $k$-space and having the Pytkeev property are independent in general.
\begin{theorem} \label{t:Weak-Pytkeev}
If $E$ is a normed space, then $E_w$ has the Pytkeev property if and only if $E$ is finite dimensional.
\end{theorem}
These results show that the question when a Banach space endowed with the weak topology is homeomorphic to a certain fixed model space from the infinite-dimensional topology is very restrictive and motivated specialists to detect the aforementioned properties only for some natural classes of subsets of $E$, e.g., balls or bounded subsets of $E$.
By $B_w$ we denote the closed unit ball $B$ of a Banach space $E$ endowed with the weak topology. It is well known that $B_w$ is (separable) metrizable if and only if the dual space $E'$ is norm separable. Schl\"{u}chtermann and Wheeler obtained in \cite[Theorem 5.1]{S-W} the following characterization.
\begin{theorem}[\cite{S-W}] \label{t:S-W-1}
The following conditions on a Banach space $E$ are equivalent: {\em (a)} $B_w$ is Fr\'{e}chet--Urysohn; {\em (b)} $B_w$ is sequential; {\em (c)} $B_w$ is a $k$-space; {\em (d)} $E$ contains no isomorphic copy of $\ell_1$.
\end{theorem}
By Theorem \ref{t:Weak-Fan-tight}, for every Banach space $E$, $B_w$ has the Reznichenko property. We prove the following result which supplements Theorem \ref{t:S-W-1}.
\begin{theorem} \label{t:Ball-Pytkeev}
For a Banach space $E$, $B_w$ has the Pytkeev property if and only if $E$ contains no isomorphic copy of $\ell_1$.
\end{theorem}
So, if $E$ is the James Tree space, then $B_w$ is Fr\'{e}chet-Urysohn but is not metrizable. On the other hand, $B_w$ has countable (fan) tightness for every Banach space $E$. This fact and Theorems \ref{t:S-W-1} and \ref{t:Ball-Pytkeev} motivate us to consider another natural generalizations of metrizability.
One of the most immediate extensions of the class of separable metrizable spaces is the class of $\aleph_{0}$-spaces introduced by Michael in \cite{Mich}. Following \cite{Mich}, a topological space $X$ is an {\em $\aleph_0$-space} if $X$ possesses a countable $k$-network. A family $\mathcal{N}$ of subsets of $X$ is a {\em $k$-network} if for any open subset $U\subset X$ and compact subset $K\subset U$ there exists a finite subfamily $\F\subset\mathcal{N}$ such that $K\subset\bigcup\FF\subset U$. Schl\"{u}chtermann and Wheeler obtained the following theorem for $B_w$.
\begin{theorem}[\cite{S-W}] \label{t:S-W-2}
The following conditions on a Banach space $E$ are equivalent: {\em (a)} $B_w$ is (separable) metrizable; {\em (b)} $B_w$ is an $\aleph_0$-space and a $k$-space.
\end{theorem}
Having in mind the Nagata-Smirnov metrization theorem, O'Meara \cite{OMe2} introduced the class of $\aleph$-spaces: A topological space $X$ is called an {\em $\aleph$-space} if $X$ is regular and has a $\sigma$-locally finite $k$-network. Any metrizable space $X$ is an \mbox{$\aleph$-space}. A topological space $X$ is an $\aleph_0$-space if and only if $X$ is a Lindel\"{o}f $\aleph$-space (\cite{GK-GMS1}). In \cite{GK-GMS1,GKKM} it is shown that each $\aleph$-space $X$ has countable $cs^\ast$-character. Recall from \cite{BZ} that a topological space $X$ has {\em countable $cs^\ast$-character} if for each $x\in X$, there exists a countable family $\DD$ of subsets of $X$, such that for each sequence in $X$ converging to $x$ and each neighborhood $U$ of $x$, there is $D\in\DD$ such that $D\subset U$ and $D$ contains infinitely many elements of that sequence. The importance of this concept for the theory of Topological Vector Spaces may be explained by the following result obtained in \cite{GaK}: If $E$ is a Baire topological vector space (tvs) or a $b$-Baire-like lcs, then $E$ is metrizable if and only if $E$ has countable $cs^\ast$-character.
Tsaban and Zdomskyy \cite{boaz} strengthened the Pytkeev property as follows. A topological space $X$ has the {\em strong Pytkeev property} if for each $x\in X$, there exists a countable family $\DD$ of subsets of $X$, such that for each neighborhood $U$ of $x$ and each \mbox{$A\subset X$} with $x\in \overline{A}\setminus A$, there is $D\in\DD$ such that $D\subset U$ and $D\cap A$ is infinite. Clearly, the strong Pytkeev property $\Rightarrow $ the Pytkeev property, however in general, the Fr\'{e}chet--Urysohn property $\not\Rightarrow $ the strong Pytkeev property $\not\Rightarrow $ $k$-space (see \cite{GKL2}). For any Polish space $X$, the function space $C_c(X)$ has the strong Pytkeev property by \cite{boaz}. This result has been extended to \v{C}ech-complete spaces $X$, see \cite{GKL2}. Moreover, if $E$ is a strict \mbox{$(LM)$-space}, a sequential dual metric space, or a $(DF)$-space of countable tightness, then $E$ has the strong Pytkeev property \cite{GKL2}. In particular, the space $D'(\Omega)$ of distributions over an open subset $\Omega\subset\mathbb{R}^{n}$ has the strong Pytkeev property while being not a \mbox{$k$-space}, see \cite{GKL2}.
Being motivated by above facts, we generalize Theorem \ref{t:S-W-2} as follows (the equivalence (i)$\Leftrightarrow$(ii) is probably well known, but hard to locate and we propose an elementary proof of it below).
\begin{theorem} \label{t:Ball-Metriz}
The following conditions on a Banach space $E$ are equivalent:
\begin{enumerate}
\item[{\rm (i)}] $B_w$ is (separable) metrizable;
\item[{\rm (ii)}] $B_w$ is first countable;
\item[{\rm (iii)}] $B_w$ has the strong Pytkeev property;
\item[{\rm (iv)}] $B_w$ is an $\aleph$-space and a $k$-space;
\item[{\rm (v)}] $B_w$ has countable $cs^\ast$-character and is a $k$-space;
\item[{\rm (vi)}] $E_w$ is an $\aleph$-space and $B_w$ is a $k$-space;
\item[{\rm (vii)}] $E_w$ has countable $cs^\ast$-character and $B_w$ is a $k$-space;
\item[{\rm (viii)}] $E_w$ has countable $cs^\ast$-character and contains no isomorphic copy of $\ell_1$;
\item[{\rm (ix)}] $E'$ is separable.
\end{enumerate}
\end{theorem}
Note that the James Tree space and the sequence space $\ell_{1}(\mathbb{R})$ (which is an \mbox{$\aleph$-space} in the weak topology, see \cite{GKKM}) show that Theorem \ref{t:Ball-Metriz} fails if one of the assumptions on $E$ is dropped.
It is natural to ask about good conditions forcing metrizable $B_w$ to be completely metrizable.
Edgar and Wheeler proved the following characterization:
\begin{theorem}[\cite{edgar}] \label{t:E-W}
Let $E$ be a separable Banach space. Then the following conditions are equivalent: {\em (1)} $B_w$ is completely metrizable; {\em (2)} $B_w$ is a Polish space; {\em (3)} $E$ has property $(PC)$ and is an Asplund space; {\em (4)} $B_w$ is metrizable, and every closed subset of it is a Baire space.
\end{theorem}
Since a metrizable space $X$ admits a complete metric generating its topology
if and only if it is \v{C}ech-complete, and any \v{C}ech-complete space is a $k$-space, Theorem \ref{t:Ball-Metriz} immediately implies the following corollary which supplements the Edgar-Wheeler Theorem \ref{t:E-W}.
\begin{corollary} \label{c:B-Polosh}
The following conditions on a Banach space $E$ are equivalent:
\begin{itemize}
\item[{\rm (i)}] $B_w$ is Polish;
\item[{\rm (ii)}] $B_w$ is a \v{C}ech-complete $\aleph$-space;
\item[{\rm (iii)}] $B_w$ has countable $cs^\ast$-character and is \v{C}ech-complete;
\item[{\rm (iv)}] $E_w$ has countable $cs^\ast$-character and $B_w$ is a \v{C}ech-complete space.
\end{itemize}
\end{corollary}
Note that the \v{C}ech-completeness of $B_w$ in (iii) cannot be replaced by the weaker condition that every closed subset of $B_w$ is a Baire space (as in Theorem \ref{t:E-W}(4)) even if $E_w$ is an $\aleph_0$-space, see Example \ref{exa:l1-Aleph0-Baire}.
The paper is organized as follows. Section \ref{sec:1} deals with the (strong) Pytkeev property and the fan tightness. Applying these concepts we prove that any \mbox{$(DF)$-space} $E$ is normable if and only if $E$ has countable fan tightness, as well as the strong dual $F$ of a strict $(LF)$-space has a countable fan tightness if and only if $F$ is metrizable. Hence the space $D'(\Omega)$ of distributions over an open subset $\Omega\subset\mathbb{R}^{n}$ does not have countable fan tightness although it has countable tightness. Theorems \ref{t:Weak-Pytkeev} and \ref{t:Ball-Pytkeev} are proved in Section \ref{sec:11}, and in Section \ref{sec:2} we prove Theorem \ref{t:Ball-Metriz}. Also we provide some examples.
\section{The strong Pytkeev property and the fan tightness in lcs} \label{sec:1}
Below we provide a simple proof of the following result to keep the paper self-contained.
\begin{proposition}[\cite{ Banakh1}] \label{p:FirstCount} The following assertions are equivalent for a topological space $X$:
\begin{itemize}
\item[{\rm (i)}] $X$ is first countable.
\item[{\rm (ii)}] $X$ has the strong Pytkeev property and countable fan tightness.
\end{itemize}
\end{proposition}
\begin{proof}
Let $\mathcal N_0$ be a family witnessing the strong Pytkeev property at $x\in X$.
We claim that $\mathcal N:=\{\bigcup \mathcal N' : \mathcal N' \in [\mathcal N_0]^{<\mathbb{N}}\}$
is a local base at $x$. If not, there exists open $ U \ni x$ such that no element of $\mathcal N$
contained in $U$ is a neighborhood of $x$. Let $\{N_i:i\in\mathbb{N}\}$ be the enumeration of all elements of
$\mathcal N_0$ which are subsets of $U$. It follows from the above that $x$ lies in the closure
of $B_n:= X\setminus\bigcup_{i\leq n} N_i$ for all $n$, and hence we can select a finite
subset $A_n$ of $B_n$ such that $\bigcup_{n\in\mathbb{N}}A_n$ has $x$ in its closure.
But this is a contradiction because obviously no $N_i$ can have infinite intersection with
$\bigcup_{n\in\mathbb{N}}A_n$.
\end{proof}
In \cite[Question 5]{GKL2} we ask whether there exists a lcs $E$ such that its dual $E'$ has uncountable algebraic dimension and $E_w$ has the strong Pytkeev property. Theorem \ref{t:Weak-Fan-tight} and Proposition \ref{p:FirstCount} immediately imply a negative answer to this question for any metrizable lcs $E$.
\begin{corollary} \label{c:Pytkeev-Metriz}
Let $E$ be a metrizable lcs. Then $E_w$ has the strong Pytkeev property if and only if $E$ is finite-dimensional.
\end{corollary}
In \cite{GKL2} we provided large classes of lcs having the strong Pytkeev property including an important class of $(DF)$-spaces. Recall that a lcs $E$ is a $(DF)$-space if $E$ has a fundamental sequence of bounded sets and every bounded set in the strong dual $(E',\beta(E',E))$ of $E$ which is the countable union of equicontinuous sets is itself equicontinuous. The strong dual $(E',\beta(E',E))$ of a metrizable lcs is a $(DF)$-space, see \cite[Theorem 8.3.8]{bonet}. Below we use the following result.
\begin{fact}[\cite{GKL2}] \label{quasi}
A $(DF)$-space $E$ has countable tightness if and only if $E$ has the strong Pytkeev property.
\end{fact}
Since a $(DF)$-space is normable if and only if it is metrizable, Fact \ref{quasi} and Proposition \ref{p:FirstCount} imply
\begin{corollary}\label{fre}
A $(DF)$-space $E$ is normable if and only if $E$ has countable fan tightness.
\end{corollary}
We use Fact \ref{quasi} also to prove the following result which supplements \cite[Theorem 3(iii)]{GKL2}.
\begin{proposition}\label{p:dist}
Let $E$ be a strict $(LF)$-space and $E':=(E',\beta(E',E))$ its strong dual. Then $E'$ has strong Pytkeev property if and only if $E'$ has countable tightness.
\end{proposition}
\begin{proof}
Assume that $E'$ has countable tightness. Let $E$ be a strict inductive limit of a sequence $\{ E_{n}\}_{n}$ of Fr\'{e}chet spaces. For each $n\in\mathbb{N}$, the strong dual $(E'_n)_{\beta}$ of $E_{n}$ is a complete $(DF)$-space. Since $E$ is the strict inductive limit, the space $E'_{\beta}$ is linearly homeomorphic with the \textit{projective
limit} of the sequence $\{(E'_{n})_{\beta}\}_{n}$ of $(DF)$-spaces, and moreover, $E'_{\beta}$ can be continuously mapped onto each $(E'_{n})_{\beta}$ by an open mapping, see \cite{horvath}. Since $E'$ has countable tightness, for every $n\in\NN$, the quotient space $(E'_{n})_{\beta}$ has countable tightness by \cite[Proposition 3]{Arch-Pon}. Hence all spaces $(E'_{n})_{\beta}$ have the strong Pytkeev property by Fact \ref{quasi}. Therefore the product $\prod_{n}(E'_n)_{\beta}$ also has the strong Pytkeev property by \cite{GK-GMS1}. Consequently $E'$ has the strong Pytkeev property.
\end{proof}
Propositions \ref{p:FirstCount} and \ref{p:dist} imply
\begin{corollary}
The strong dual $F$ of a strict $(LF)$-space has countable fan tightness if and only if $F$ is metrizable.
\end{corollary}
We end this section with the next two examples.
\begin{example} {\em
If $\Omega\subset\mathbb{R}^{n}$ is an open set, then the space of test functions $\mathfrak{D}(\Omega)$ is a complete Montel $(LF)$-space. As usually, $\mathfrak{D}'(\Omega)$ denotes its strong dual, the space of distributions. We proved in \cite{GKL2} that $\mathfrak{D}'(\Omega)$ has the strong Pytkeev property, but it is not a $k$-space. Now Proposition \ref{p:FirstCount} implies that $\mathfrak{D}'(\Omega)$ does not have countable fan tightness. }
\end{example}
\begin{example} {\em
Let $E:=C_{c}(X)$ be any Fr\'echet lcs which is not normed (for example $E:=C_{c}(\mathbb{R})$). Then $(E',\beta(E',E))$ does not have countable fan tightness although it has countable tightness. Indeed, since $C_c(X)$ is quasi-normable, it is distinguished by \cite[Corollary 1]{bierstedt2}, and hence the space $E'_\beta := (E',\beta(E',E))$ is quasibarrelled. Then, by \cite[Theorem 12.3]{kak}, the space $E'_\beta$ has countable tightness. Finally, Corollary \ref{fre} implies that $E'_\beta$ does not have countable fan tightness.}
\end{example}
\section{Proofs of Theorems \ref{t:Weak-Pytkeev} and \ref{t:Ball-Pytkeev}} \label{sec:11}
Denote by $S_{E}$ the unit sphere of a normed space $E$.
\begin{lemma} \label{lemma:Funct-Seq}
Let $\{ A_n\}_{n\in\NN}$ be a sequence of unbounded subsets of a normed space $E$. Then there is $\chi\in S_E$ such that
\[
A_n\setminus \{ x\in E: |\langle\chi, x\rangle| <1/2\} \not=\emptyset, \mbox{ for every $n\in\NN$.}
\]
\end{lemma}
\begin{proof}
First we prove the following claim.
{\bf Claim}. {\em There is a sequence $S=\{ a_n\}_{n\in \NN}\subset E$, where $a_n\in A_n$ for every $n\in \NN$, and a sequence $T=\{ \chi_n\}_{n\in\NN} \subset S_{E'}$ such that}
\begin{equation} \label{equation-1}
|\langle \chi_n, a_i\rangle| >1, \; \mbox{ for every } 1\leq i\leq n <\infty.
\end{equation}
We build $S$ and $T$ by induction. For $n=1$ take arbitrarily $a_1\in A_1$ such that $\| a_1\| >1$ (note that $A_1$ is unbounded) and $\chi_1\in S_{E'}$ such that $|\langle \chi_1, a_1\rangle|=\| a_1\|$. Assume that for $n\in\NN$, we found $a_i\in A_i$ and $\chi_k\in S_{E'}$ such that
\begin{equation} \label{equation-2}
|\langle \chi_k, a_i\rangle| >1, \; \mbox{ for every } 1\leq i\leq k\leq n.
\end{equation}
We distinguish between two cases.
{\em Case 1}. The set $\langle \chi_n, A_{n+1}\rangle$ is an unbounded subset of $\IR$. Then we choose $a_{n+1}\in A_{n+1}$ such that $|\langle \chi_n, a_{n+1}\rangle|>1$ and set $\chi_{n+1}:=\chi_n$. It is clear that (\ref{equation-2}) holds also for $n+1$.
{\em Case 2}. $N:= \sup\{ |\langle \chi_n, a\rangle |: a\in A_{n+1}\} <\infty$.
Since $A_{n+1}$ is unbounded, there is $\eta\in S_E$ such that $\langle \eta, A_{n+1}\rangle$ is an unbounded subset of $\IR$. Choose $0<\lambda <1$ such that
\begin{equation} \label{equation-3}
\lambda |\langle \chi_n, a_i\rangle| - (1-\lambda)|\langle \eta, a_i\rangle| >1, \; \mbox{ for every } 1\leq i\leq n,
\end{equation}
and choose $a_{n+1}\in A_{n+1}$ such that
\begin{equation} \label{equation-4}
(1-\lambda)|\langle \eta, a_{n+1}\rangle| >N+1.
\end{equation}
Set $\xi := \lambda \chi_n + (1-\lambda)\eta$. Then by (\ref{equation-3}), we have
\begin{equation} \label{equation-5}
|\langle \xi, a_i\rangle|\geq \lambda |\langle \chi_n, a_i\rangle| - (1-\lambda)|\langle \eta, a_i\rangle| >1, \; \mbox{ for every } 1\leq i\leq n,
\end{equation}
and, by (\ref{equation-4}),
\begin{equation} \label{equation-6}
|\langle \xi, a_{n+1}\rangle|\geq (1-\lambda)|\langle \eta, a_{n+1}\rangle| - \lambda |\langle \chi_n, a_{n+1}\rangle| >1.
\end{equation}
Finally we set $\chi_{n+1} := \xi/\|\xi\|\in S_{E'}$. Since $\| \xi\|\leq 1$, (\ref{equation-5}) and (\ref{equation-6}) imply that $\chi_{n+1}$ and $a_{n+1}$ satisfy (\ref{equation-2}). The claim is proved.
Since the unit ball $B_{E'}$ of the dual $E'$ is compact in the weak$^\ast$ topology, we can find a cluster point $\chi \in B_{E'}$ of the sequence $T$ defined in Claim. In particular, for every $i\in\NN$ there is $n>i$ such that $|\langle \chi_n, a_i\rangle - \langle \chi, a_i\rangle| <1/2$. Then (\ref{equation-1}) implies
\begin{equation} \label{equation-7}
|\langle \chi, a_i\rangle| >1/2 , \; \mbox{ for every } i\in\NN.
\end{equation}
Now (\ref{equation-7}) implies that $a_n \in A_n \setminus \{ x\in E: |\langle \chi, x\rangle|< 1/2\}$ for every $n\in\NN$, which proves the lemma.
\end{proof}
We are at position to prove Theorem \ref{t:Weak-Pytkeev}.
\begin{proof} [Proof of Theorem \ref{t:Weak-Pytkeev}]
Assume towards a contradiction that there is an infinite dimensional normed space $E$ such that $E_w$ has the Pytkeev property.
{\bf Claim}. {\em For every subset $A\subset E_w$ with $0\in\overline{A}\setminus A$, there is a bounded subset $D$ of $A$ such that $0\in\overline{D}$.}
Indeed, suppose that there is a subset $A$ of $E_w$ with $0\in\overline{A}\setminus A$ and such that $0\not\in \overline{A\cap nB}$ for every $n\in\NN$. So $0\in \bigcap_{n\in\NN} \overline{A\setminus nB}$. Since $E_w$ has countable fan tightness (see Theorem \ref{t:Weak-Fan-tight}), there are finite subsets $F_n \subset A\setminus nB$ such that $0\in \overline{\cup_{n\in\NN} F_n}$. Set $F:=\bigcup_{n\in\NN} F_n$. Fix arbitrarily sequence $A_1, A_2, \dots $ of infinite subsets of $F$.
By the construction of $F$, all sets $A_n$ are unbounded. Lemma \ref{lemma:Funct-Seq} implies that there is a weakly open neighborhood $U$ of zero such that $A_n\setminus U$ is not empty for every $n\in\NN$. Thus $E_w$ does not have the Pytkeev property. This contradiction proves the claim.
Now Theorem 14.3 of \cite{kak} and Claim imply that $E_w$ is a Fr\'{e}chet-Urysohn space, and hence, by Theorem \ref{t:Weak-k-space}, $E$ is finite dimensional. This contradiction shows that $E_w$ does not have the Pytkeev property.
\end{proof}
To prove Theorem \ref{t:Ball-Pytkeev} we define the following subset of $S_{\ell_1}$
\begin{equation}\label{equ:L1-A}
\begin{split}
A:=\{ & a=\big(a(i)\big)\in S_{\ell_1} | \\
& \exists m,n\in\NN : a(m)=-a(n)=1/2, \mbox{ and } a(i) =0 \mbox{ otherwise} \}.
\end{split}
\end{equation}
\begin{lemma}
$0\in \overline{A}$.
\end{lemma}
\begin{proof}
Let $U$ be a neighborhood of $0$ of the canonical form
\[
U=\left\{ x\in\ell_1 : |\langle\chi_k,x\rangle|<\epsilon , \mbox{ where } \chi_k\in S_{\ell_\infty} \mbox{ for } 1\leq k\leq s\right\}.
\]
Let $I$ be an infinite subset of $\NN$ such that, for every $1\leq k\leq s$, either $\chi_k(i)>0$ for all $i\in I$, or $\chi_k(i)=0$ for all $i\in I$, or $\chi_k(i)<0$ for all $i\in I$. Take a natural number $N> 1/\epsilon$. Since $I$ is infinite, by induction, one can find $m,n\in\NN$ satisfying the following condition: for every $1\leq k\leq s$ there is $0< t_k\leq N$ such that
\begin{equation}\label{equ:L1-1}
\frac{t_k -1}{N} \leq \min\big\{ |\chi_k(m)| , |\chi_k(n)| \big\} \leq \max\big\{ |\chi_k(m)| , |\chi_k(n)| \big\} \leq \frac{t_k}{N}.
\end{equation}
Set $a=\big(a(i)\big)\in A$, where $a(m)=-a(n)=1/2$, and $a(i)=0$ otherwise. Then, by the construction of $I$ and (\ref{equ:L1-1}), we obtain $|\chi_k(a)|<1/N <\epsilon$ for every $1\leq k\leq s$. Thus $a\in U$, and hence $0\in \overline{A}$.
\end{proof}
\begin{proposition}\label{p:Pytkeev-Ball}
The unit ball $B_w$ of $\ell_1$ in the weak topology does not have the Pytkeev property.
\end{proposition}
\begin{proof}
It is enough to show that for any sequence $A_1, A_2,\dots$ of infinite subsets of the set $A$ defined in (\ref{equ:L1-A}) there is a neighborhood of $0$ which does not contain $A_i$ for every $i\in\NN$.
Fix arbitrarily $a_1\in A_1$. So $a_1(m_1)=-a_1(n_1)=1/2$ for some $m_1,n_1\in\NN$. Set $\chi(m_1)=-\chi(n_1)=1$ and $D_1=\supp(a_1)=\{m_1,n_1\}$. Then
\[
\left| \sum_{i\in D_1} \chi(i) a_1(i)\right| = |\chi(m_1)a_1(m_1) +\chi(n_1)a_1(n_1)|=1.
\]
Since $A_2$ is infinite, we can choose $a_2\in A_2$ such that \mbox{$\supp(a_2)=\{m_2,n_2\}\not\subset D_1$}. If $\supp(a_2)\cap D_1=\emptyset$, we set $\chi(m_2)=-\chi(n_2)=1$. If $m_2\in D_1$, we set $\chi(n_2)=-\chi(m_2)$, and if $n_2\in D_1$, we set $\chi(m_2)=-\chi(n_2)$. Then
\[
\left| \sum_{i\in D_2} \chi(i) a_2(i)\right| = |\chi(m_2)a_2(m_2) +\chi(n_2)a_2(n_2)|=1.
\]
Put $D_2=\supp(a_2)\cup D_1$. Suppose we found $a_k\in A_k$ for $1\leq k\leq s$ and defined $D_s =\cup_{k\leq s} \supp(a_k)$ and $\chi(i)=\pm 1$ for $i\in D_s$ such that
\begin{equation}\label{equ:L1-2}
\left| \sum_{i\in D_s} \chi(i)a_k(i) \right| =1 , \; \mbox{ for every } 1\leq k\leq s.
\end{equation}
Since $A_{s+1}$ is infinite and $D_s$ is finite, we can choose $a_{s+1}\in A_{s+1}$ such that
\[
\supp(a_{s+1})=\{m_{s+1},n_{s+1}\}\not\subset D_s.
\]
If $\supp(a_{s+1})\cap D_s=\emptyset$, we set $\chi(m_{s+1})=-\chi(n_{s+1})=1$. If $m_{s+1}\in D_s$, we set $\chi(n_{s+1})=-\chi(m_{s+1})$, and if $n_{s+1}\in D_s$, we set $\chi(m_{s+1})=-\chi(n_{s+1})$. So $|\chi(m_{s+1})a_{s+1}(m_{s+1}) +\chi(n_{s+1})a_{s+1}(n_{s+1})|=1$. Put $D_{s+1}=\supp(a_{s+1})\cup D_s$. In particular, (\ref{equ:L1-2}) holds also for $s+1$.
Put $D=\cup_{s\in\NN} D_s$.
Set $\chi=(\chi(i))\in S_{\ell_\infty}$, where $\chi(i)=\chi(n_s)$ if $i=n_s$, $\chi(i)=\chi(m_s)$ if $i=m_s$ for some $s\in\NN$, and $\chi(i)=0$ if $i\not\in D$. Then (\ref{equ:L1-2}) implies that $|\chi(a_s)|=1$ for every $s\in\NN$. Finally we set $U=\{ x\in \ell_1 : |\langle\chi,x\rangle|<1/2\}$. Then $a_s \in A_s \setminus U$ for every $s\in\NN$. Thus $B_w$ does not have the Pytkeev property.
\end{proof}
Now we are ready to prove Theorem \ref{t:Ball-Pytkeev}.
\begin{proof}[Proof of Theorem \ref{t:Ball-Pytkeev}]
If $B_w$ has the Pytkeev property, then $E$ contains no isomorphic copy of $\ell_1$ by Proposition \ref{p:Pytkeev-Ball}. The converse assertion follows from Theorem \ref{t:S-W-1}.
\end{proof}
\section{Proof of Theorem \ref{t:Ball-Metriz}} \label{sec:2}
We need the following fact which is similar to Proposition 7.7 of \cite{Mich}.
\begin{proposition} \label{p:Sequence-Aleph}
Assume that a regular space $X$ is covered by an increasing sequence $\{ A_n\}_{n\in\NN}$ of closed subsets.
\begin{enumerate}
\item[{\rm (i)}] If all $A_n$ are $\aleph$-spaces (resp. an $\aleph_0$-spaces), and if each compact $K\subset X$ is covered by some $A_n$, then $X$ is an $\aleph$-space (resp. an $\aleph_0$-space, respectively).
\item[{\rm (ii)}] If all $A_n$ have countable $cs^\ast$-character and each convergent sequence $S\subset X$ is covered by some $A_n$, then $X$ has countable $cs^\ast$-character.
\end{enumerate}
\end{proposition}
\begin{proof}
(i): Assume that all $A_n$ are $\aleph$-spaces and let $\DD_n =\bigcup_{k\in\NN} \DD_{n,k}$ be a $\sigma$-locally finite $k$-network for $A_k$. It is easy to see that the family
$
\DD := \bigcup_{n\in\NN}\bigcup_{k\in\NN} \DD_{n,k}
$
is $\sigma$-locally finite in $X$ and covers $X$. If $K\subset U$ with $K$ compact and $U$ open in $X$, take $A_n$ such that $K\subset A_n$ and choose a finite subfamily $\FF \subset \DD_n \subset \DD$ such that $K\subset \bigcup\FF \subset A_n \cap U \subset U$. This means that $\DD$ is a $k$-network for $X$, and hence $X$ is an $\aleph$-space. The case $A_n$ are $\aleph_0$-spaces is proved analogously.
(ii): Fix $x\in X$, an open neighborhood $U$ of $x$ and a sequence $S=\{ s_n\}_{n\in \NN}$ converging to $x$. Set $I(x):=\{ n\in\NN: x\in A_n\}$ and let $\DD_n (x)$ be a countable $cs^\ast$-network at $x$ in $A_n, n\in I(x)$. Set $\DD(x) =\bigcup \{ \DD_n(x): n\in I(x)\}$. Take $n\in I(x)$ such that $S\subset A_n$. Then, by definition, we can find $D\in \DD_n(x) \subset \DD(x)$ such that $x\in D\subset U$ and $\{ n\in \NN : s_n\in D\}$ is infinite. Thus $\DD(x)$ is a countable $cs^\ast$-network at $x$.
\end{proof}
\begin{corollary}
Let $A$ be a closed subset of a tvs $E$.
\begin{enumerate}
\item[{\rm (i)}] If every compact subset $K\subset E$ is contained in some $nA$, then $E$ is an $\aleph$-space (resp. an $\aleph_0$-space) if and only if so is $A$.
\item[{\rm (ii)}] If every convergent sequence $S\subset E$ is contained in some $nA$, then $E$ has countable $cs^\ast$-character if and only if so does $A$.
\end{enumerate}
\end{corollary}
\begin{proof}
Clearly $E=\bigcup_{n\in\NN} nA$. Since $A$ and $nA$ are topologically isomorphic for every $n\in\NN$, the assertion follows from Proposition \ref{p:Sequence-Aleph}.
\end{proof}
Since any weakly compact subset of a Banach space is contained in $nB$ for some $n\in\NN$,
the last corollary implies (cf. \cite[Theorem 4.2]{S-W})
\begin{corollary} \label{c:Sequence-Aleph}
\begin{enumerate}
\item[{\rm (i)}] A Banach space $E$ is a weakly $\aleph$-space (resp. a weakly $\aleph_0$-space) if and only if so is $B_w$.
\item[{\rm (ii)}] A Banach space $E$ has countable $cs^\ast$-character if and only if so does $B_w$.
\end{enumerate}
\end{corollary}
Any first countable topological group is metrizable, but there are first-countable non-metrizable compact spaces. However, for the unit ball of Banach spaces we have the following result which supplements Theorem \ref{t:S-W-1} (probably known but hard to locate).
\begin{proposition}\label{p:Ball-FirstCountable}
Let $E$ be a Banach space. Then $B_w$ is metrizable if and only if it is first countable.
\end{proposition}
\begin{proof}
Assume that $B_w$ is first countable. Denote by $\mathcal{W}$ the standard group uniformity
\[
\big\{ (x,y)\in E^2:x-y\in U,\, \mbox{ where } 0\in U\in \sigma(E,E') \big\}
\]
on $E$ generating the topology $\sigma(E,E')$. Since $B_w$ is homeomorphic to the ball $2B_w =B_w -B_w$ of radius $2$, the set $2B_w$ is also first countable. So there exists a sequence $\{ U_n\}_{n\in\NN}\subset \sigma(E,E')$ of open symmetric neighborhoods of $0$, such that $\{U_n \cap 2B_w :n\in\mathbb{N}\}$ is a countable base at $0$. Let us show that the family $\{W_n:n\in\mathbb{N}\}$, where $W_n=\{(x,y)\in B\times B : x-y\in U_n\}$, is a countable base of the uniformity $\mathcal{W}|_B$.
Indeed, fix arbitrarily $W=\{(x,y)\in B\times B : x-y\in U\} \in \mathcal{W}|_B$ with $0\in U\in \sigma(E,E')$. Choose $n\in\NN$ such that $U_n\cap 2B \subset U\cap 2B$. Then, for every $(x,y)\in W_n$, we have $x-y\in U_n$ and also $x-y\in 2B$. So $x-y\in U_n\cap 2B \subset U\cap 2B$, and hence $(x,y)\in W$.
By Theorem 8.1.21 of \cite{Eng}, the uniformity $\mathcal{W}|_B$ is generated by a metric $\rho$ on $B$. So the topologies $\tau_\rho$ and $\tau_B$ on $B$ induced by the metric $\rho$ and $\mathcal{W}|_B$ coincide (see \cite[4.1.11, 4.2.6 and 8.1.18]{Eng}). Taking into account that $\tau_B$ and $\sigma(E,E')|_B$ also coincide (see \cite[8.1.17]{Eng}), we obtain that $B_w$ is metrizable. The converse assertion is trivial.
\end{proof}
Recall that a topological space $X$ has the \textit{property} $\left( \alpha_{4}\right) $ if for any $\{x_{m,n}:\left( m,n\right) \in \mathbb{N}\times\mathbb{N}\}\subset X$
with $\lim_{n}x_{m,n}=x\in X,$ $m\in \mathbb{N},$ there exists a sequence $\left( m_{k}\right) _{k}$ of distinct natural numbers and a sequence $\left( n_{k}\right) _{k}$ of natural numbers such that $\lim_{k}x_{m_{k},n_{k}}=x$.
The following result is similar to \cite[Lemma 3.2]{GKKLP} and is essentially a corollary of the proof of \cite[Theorem~4]{nyikos}. However, the latter is devoted to general (i.e., not necessary Hausdorff) topological groups which makes big parts of its proof not relevant for us, and hence we believe that a streamlined proof of the proposition below is still of some value.
\begin{proposition} \label{important}
Any convex and Fr\'{e}chet-Urysohn subset $F$
of a topological vector space (tvs) $E$ has the property $(\alpha_4)$.
\end{proposition}
\begin{proof}
Let $(x_{m,n})_{n\in\NN}$ be a sequence of elements of $F$ convergent to $x\in F$ for all $m\in \NN$. Denote by $J$ the set of all $m\in\NN$ for which the family $\{ n\in\NN : x=x_{m,n}\}$ is nonempty. If $J$ is infinite the assertion is trivial. If $J$ is finite, without loss of generality we may additionally assume that $x\neq x_{m,n}$ for all $m,n\in\NN$. Two cases are possible.
(i): The set $I:=\left\{m\in\NN:\exists n(m)\in\NN\: \big(x=1/2(x_{m,n(m)}+x_{1,m})\big)\right\}$ is infinite. Since $x_{m,n(m)}=2x-x_{1,m}$ for all $m\in I$ and $(x_{1,m})_{m\in I}$ converges to $x$, so does the sequence $(x_{m,n(m)})_{m\in I}$.
(ii): The set $I$ defined above is finite, say $\max(I)=q$. Set
\[
X=\{1/2(x_{m,n}+x_{1,m}) : n\in \NN, m>q \},
\]
and observe that $X\subset F\setminus\{x\}$ and $x\in\overline{X}$. Since $F$ has the Fr\'{e}chet--Urysohn property, there exists a sequence
$\big(1/2(x_{m_k,n_k}+x_{1,m_k})\big)_{k\in\NN}$ of elements of $X$ converging to $x$. It follows from the assumption $x\not\in\{ x_{1,m}:m\in\NN\}$ that for every $m\in\NN$ there are at most finitely many $k$ such that $m_k=m$, and therefore passing to a subsequence if necessary we may assume that $m_{k+1}>m_k$ for all $k$.
Thus $\big(x_{1,m_k}\big)_{k\in\NN}$ converges to $x$, and hence so does $\big(x_{m_k,n_k}\big)_{k\in\NN}$.
In any of these cases there exists a sequence which converges to $x$ and meets $(x_{m,n})_{n\in\NN}$ for infinitely many $m$, which completes our proof.
\end{proof}
\begin{corollary}\label{aleph}
A convex subset $D$ of a tvs $E$ is metrizable if and only if $D$ is both a Fr\'echet-Urysohn space and an $\aleph$-space.
\end{corollary}
\begin{proof}
This follows from Proposition \ref{important} and the fact that a topological space which is an $\aleph$-space and Fr\'echet-Urysohn with property $(\alpha_{4})$ is metrizable, see \cite[Theorem 2.2]{GKKM}.
\end{proof}
Next proposition is crucial for the proof of Theorem \ref{t:Ball-Metriz}.
\begin{proposition} \label{p:ball-Metriz}
Let $E$ be a Banach space. If $B_w$ is a $k$-space and has countable $cs^\ast$-character, then it is metrizable.
\end{proposition}
\begin{proof}
In the proof all subspaces $X$ of $E$ are considered with the weak topology $\sigma(E,E')|_X$. By Theorem \ref{t:S-W-1} we can assume that $B_w$ is Fr\'{e}chet-Urysohn. By Proposition \ref{p:Ball-FirstCountable}, it is enough to prove that $B_w$ is first countable.
Fix $x\in B$, a neighborhood $U$ of $x$ in $B_w$ and a countable $cs^\ast$-network $\mathcal{N}$ at $x$ in $B_w$. Let $\{N_i:i\in\mathbb{N}\}$ be an enumeration of all elements of $\mathcal{N}$ which are subsets of $U$. We claim that there exists $m$ such that $\bigcup_{i\leq m} N_i$ is a neighborhood of $x$ in $B_w$. If not, for every $m\in\NN$ there exists a sequence $\{x_{m,n}:n\in\mathbb{N}\}\subset B\setminus \bigcup_{i\leq m} N_i$ converging to $x$. Since $B_w$ is a bounded subset of $E_w$ we apply Proposition \ref{important} to find a sequence $\left( m_{k}\right)_{k}$ of distinct natural numbers and a sequence $\left( n_{k}\right)_{k}$ of natural numbers such that $\lim_{k}x_{m_{k},n_{k}}=x$. It follows that there exists $i\in\mathbb{N}$ such that the intersection $C:=N_i\cap\{x_{m_{k},n_{k}}:k\in\mathbb{N}\}$ is infinite. On the other hand, $x_{m_{k},n_{k}}\not\in N_i$ for all $k> i$ because $m_k> i$, and hence $C$ is finite. This contradiction shows that $\{\bigcup\mathcal N':\mathcal N'\in [\mathcal N]^{<\mathbb{N}}\}$ is a countable base at $x$ in $B_w$.
\end{proof}
Now we prove Theorem \ref{t:Ball-Metriz}.
\begin{proof}[Proof of Theorem \ref{t:Ball-Metriz}]
(i)$\Rightarrow$(ii)$\Rightarrow$(iii) is clear. (iii)$\Leftrightarrow$(i) follows from
Theorem \ref{t:Weak-Fan-tight} and Propositions \ref{p:FirstCount} and \ref{p:Ball-FirstCountable}. The separable case and (i)$\Leftrightarrow$(ix) are well known, see \cite{fabian}. (vii)$\Leftrightarrow$(viii) follows from Theorem \ref{t:S-W-1}. (i)$\Rightarrow$(iv) is clear, and (iv)$\Rightarrow$(v) and (vi)$\Rightarrow$(vii) follow from the fact that every $\aleph$-space has countable $cs^\ast$-character (see \cite[Corollary 3.8]{GK-GMS1}). (iv)$\Leftrightarrow$(vi) and (v)$\Leftrightarrow$(vii) follow from Corollary \ref{c:Sequence-Aleph}. Finally, (v)$\Leftrightarrow$(i) follows from Proposition \ref{p:ball-Metriz}.
\end{proof}
The following corollary generalizes Corollary 5.6 of \cite{GKKM}.
\begin{corollary}
Let $E$ be a Banach space not containing $\ell_1$. Then $E'$ is separable if and only if $E_w$ has countable $cs^\ast$-character.
\end{corollary}
In \cite[Corollary 5.3]{GKKM} we proved that a reflexive Fr\'{e}chet space is a weakly $\aleph$-space if and only if $E'$ is separable. For reflexive Banach spaces we strengthen this result as follows.
\begin{corollary} \label{c:Reflex-Separ}
Let $E$ be an infinite dimension reflexive Banach space. Then $E_w$ does not have the
strong Pytkeev property. Moreover, the following conditions are equivalent: (i) $E_w$ has countable $cs^\ast$-character; (ii) $B_w$ has countable $cs^\ast$-character; (iii) $E'$ is separable;
(iv) $B_w$ is Polish.
\end{corollary}
\begin{proof}
The space $E_w$ does not have the strong Pytkeev property by Corollary \ref{c:Pytkeev-Metriz}.
By Theorem B of \cite{edgar}, $B_w$ is \v{C}ech-complete, and
thus the second assertion follows from Theorem \ref{t:Ball-Metriz}
and the fact that any metrizable separable \v{Cech}-complete space is Polish.
\end{proof}
For example, for $1<p<\infty$, the reflexive space $\ell_p(\Gamma)$ has countable $cs^\ast$-character in the weak topology if and only if $\Gamma$ countable, which extends Example 3.1 of \cite{GKKM}.
Corollary \ref{c:Reflex-Separ} also shows that for the strong Pytkeev property there does not exist a result analogous to Corollary \ref{c:Sequence-Aleph}. Indeed, if $E=\ell_2$, then $B_w$ has the strong Pytkeev property because it is Polish, but $E_w$ does not have the strong Pytkeev property.
Below we consider examples clarifying relations between the notions from Theorems \ref{t:Ball-Metriz} and \ref{t:E-W} and other notions considered in \cite{edgar}.
\begin{example} \label{exa:l1-Aleph0-Baire}{\em
Let $E=\ell_1$. Then $E$ is a weakly $\aleph_0$-space by \cite[7.10]{Mich} and $B_w$ is almost \v{C}ech-complete \cite[6(9)]{edgar}. So every closed subset of $B_w$ is also almost \v{C}ech-complete, hence Baire (see \cite{AartsLut}). Another argument: The original norm of $E$ has the Kadec-Klee property, i.e. the weak and the norm topologies coincide on the unit sphere of $E$; now apply \cite[Proposition 12.56]{fabian}. Since $\ell'_1 =\ell_\infty$ is not separable, $B_w$ is not metrizable, and hence $B_w$ is not a $k$-space by Theorem \ref{t:Ball-Metriz}. In particular, the conditions ``$B_w$ is a $k$-space'' in Theorem \ref{t:S-W-2} and ``$B_w$ is metrizable'' in Theorem \ref{t:E-W} cannot be removed. Note that $E$ has $RNP$ and $(PC)$ but it is not a Godefroy space (see \cite{edgar}).}
\end{example}
\begin{example}{\em
Let $E=c_0$. As $c'_0=\ell_1$ is separable, $E$ is a weakly $\aleph_0$-space by \cite{GKKLP} and $B_w$ is metrizable (hence a $k$-space). The ball $B_w$ is not \v{C}ech-complete by \cite{edgar}. Note that (see \cite{edgar}) $E$ does not have $RNP$ and $(PC)$ and is not a Godefroy space, but $E$ is Asplund.}
\end{example}
Recall that a topological space $X$ is called \emph{cosmic}, if $X$ is a regular space with a countable network (a family $\mathcal{N}$ of subsets of $X$ is called a \emph{network} in $X$ if, whenever $x\in U$ with $U$ open in $X$, then $x\in N\subset U$ for some $N \in\mathcal{N}$). A space $X$ is called a {\em $\sigma$-space} if it is regular and has a $\sigma$-locally finite network.
\begin{remark}
Let $E$ be the James Tree space. Then $E_w$ is a cosmic space as the continuous image of a separable metrizable space $E$ (see \cite{Mich}). Since $E'$ is not separable, $E'$ has uncountable $cs^\ast$-character. So one cannot replace the countability of $cs^\ast$-character of $E_w$ or $B_w$ in Theorem \ref{t:Ball-Metriz} by $E_w$ or $B_w$ being cosmic.
\end{remark}
For a Banach space $E$, Corson \cite{Corson} proved that $E_w$ is paracompact if and only if $E_w$ is Lindel\"{o}f, and Reznichenko \cite{Reznich} proved that $E_w$ is Lindel\"{o}f if and only if $E_w$ is normal. On the other hand, we proved in \cite{GK-GMS1} that a topological space $X$ is cosmic (resp. an $\aleph_0$-space) if and only if it is a Lindel\"{o}f $\sigma$-space (resp. a Lindel\"{o}f $\aleph_0$-space). In particular, these results imply
\begin{proposition}
For a Banach space $E$, the following conditions are equivalent: {\em (a)} $E_w$ is an $\aleph_0$-space; {\em (b)} $E_w$ is a paracompact $\aleph$-space; {\em (c)} $E_w$ is a Lindel\"{o}f $\aleph$-space; {\em (d)} $E_w$ is a normal $\aleph$-space.
\end{proposition}
\bibliographystyle{amsplain}
|
\section{Introduction}
The main goal of this article is to construct an example that does not satisfy a stronger version of the Hodge conjecture introduced in \cite{DemaillyHodge}. To state our main results, we first recall some basic definitions, following \cite[Chapter I]{DemaillyBook1}.
Let $X$ be a complex manifold of dimension $n$. If $k$ is a nonnegative integer, we denote by $\mathscr{D}^{k}(X)$ the space of smooth complex differential forms of degree $k$ with compact support, endowed with the inductive limit topology. The space of currents of dimension $k$ is the topological dual space $\mathscr{D}'_{k}(X)$, that is, the space of all continuous linear functionals on $\mathscr{D}^{k}(X)$:
\[
\mathscr{D}'_{k}(X):=\mathscr{D}^{k}(X)'.
\]
The pairing between a current $\mathscr{T}$ and a differential form $\varphi$ will be denoted $\langle \mathscr{T},\varphi \rangle$. A $k$-dimensional current $\mathscr{T}$ is a \emph{weak limit} of a sequence of $k$-dimensional currents $\mathscr{T}_i$ if
\[
\lim_{i \to \infty} \langle \mathscr{T}_i, \varphi \rangle = \langle \mathscr{T}, \varphi \rangle \ \ \text{for all $\varphi \in \mathscr{D}^{k}(X)$}.
\]
There are corresponding decompositions according to the bidegree and bidimension
\[
\mathscr{D}^k(X)=\bigoplus_{p+q=k} \mathscr{D}^{p,q}(X), \quad \mathscr{D}'_k(X)=\bigoplus_{p+q=k} \mathscr{D}'_{p,q}(X).
\]
Most operations on smooth differential forms extend by duality to currents. For instance, the exterior derivative of a $k$-dimensional current $\mathscr{T}$ is the $(k-1)$-dimensional current $d\mathscr{T}$ defined by
\[
\langle d\mathscr{T},\varphi \rangle = (-1)^{k+1} \langle \mathscr{T}, d\varphi \rangle, \quad \varphi \in \mathscr{D}^{k-1}(X).
\]
The current $\mathscr{T}$ is \emph{closed} if its exterior derivative vanishes, and $\mathscr{T}$ is \emph{real} if it is invariant under the complex conjugation. When $\mathscr{T}$ is closed, it defines a cohomology class of $X$, denoted $\{\mathscr{T}\}$.
The space of smooth differential forms of bidegree $(p,p)$ contains the cone of positive differential forms.
By definition, a smooth differential $(p,p)$-form $\varphi$ is \emph{positive} if
\[
\text{$\varphi(x)|_S$ is a nonnegative volume form for all $p$-planes $S \subseteq T_x X$ and $x \in X$}.
\]
Dually, a current $\mathscr{T}$ of bidimension $(p,p)$ is \emph{strongly positive} if
\[
\langle \mathscr{T}, \varphi \rangle \ge 0 \ \ \text{for every positive differential $(p,p)$-form $\varphi$ on $X$}.
\]
Integrating along complex analytic subsets of $X$ provides an important class of strongly positive currents on $X$.
If $Z$ is a $p$-dimensional complex analytic subset of $X$, then the \emph{integration current} $[Z]$ is the $(p,p)$-dimensional current defined by integrating over the smooth locus
\[
\big\langle [Z], \varphi \big\rangle = \int_{Z_{\text{reg}}} \varphi, \quad \varphi \in \mathscr{D}^{p,p}(X).
\]
Suppose from now on that $X$ is an $n$-dimensional smooth projective algebraic variety over the complex numbers, and let $p$ and $q$ be nonnegative integers with $p+q=n$. Let us consider the following statements:
\begin{enumerate}
\item[($\textrm{HC}$)] The Hodge conjecture\\
The Hodge conjecture holds for $X$ in codimension $q$, that is, the intersection
\[
H^{2q}(X,\mathbb{Q})~ \cap H^{q,q}(X)
\]
consists of classes of $p$-dimensional algebraic cycles with rational coefficients.\\
\item[($\textrm{HC}'$)] The Hodge conjecture for currents\\
If $\mathscr{T}$ is a $(p,p)$-dimensional real closed current on $X$ with cohomology class
\[
\{\mathscr{T}\} \in \mathbb{R} \otimes_\mathbb{Z} \big(H^{2q}(X,\mathbb{Z})/\textrm{tors}~ \cap H^{q,q}(X) \big),
\]
then $\mathscr{T}$ is a weak limit of the form
\[
\mathscr{T}=\lim_{i \to \infty} \mathscr{T}_i, \quad \mathscr{T}_i=\sum_j \lambda_{ij} [Z_{ij}],
\]
where $\lambda_{ij}$ are real numbers and $Z_{ij}$ are $p$-dimensional subvarieties of $X$.\\
\item[($\textrm{HC}^+$)] The Hodge conjecture for strongly positive currents\\
If $\mathscr{T}$ is a $(p,p)$-dimensional strongly positive closed current on $X$ with cohomology class
\[
\{\mathscr{T}\} \in \mathbb{R} \otimes_\mathbb{Z} \big(H^{2q}(X,\mathbb{Z})/\textrm{tors}~ \cap H^{q,q}(X) \big),
\]
then $\mathscr{T}$ is a weak limit of the form
\[
\mathscr{T}=\lim_{i \to \infty} \mathscr{T}_i, \quad \mathscr{T}_i=\sum_j \lambda_{ij} [Z_{ij}],
\]
where $\lambda_{ij}$ are positive real numbers and $Z_{ij}$ are $p$-dimensional subvarieties of $X$.
\end{enumerate}
Demailly proved in \cite[Th\'eor\`eme 1.10]{DemaillyHodge} that, for any smooth projective variety and $q$ as above,
\[
\textrm{HC}^+ \implies \textrm{HC}.
\]
Furthermore, he showed that $\textrm{HC}^+$ holds for any smooth projective variety when $q=1$, see \cite[Th\'eor\`eme 1.9]{DemaillyHodge} and the proof given in \cite[Chapter 13]{DemaillyBook2}.
In \cite[Theorem 13.40]{DemaillyBook2}, Demailly showed that, in fact, for any smooth projective variety and $q$,
\[
\textrm{HC} \iff \textrm{HC}',
\]
and asked whether $\textrm{HC}'$ implies $\textrm{HC}^+$ \cite[Remark 13.43]{DemaillyBook2}.
In Theorem \ref{Main4}, we show that $\textrm{HC}^+$ is not true in general:
\begin{theorem}\label{Main4-intro}
There is a $4$-dimensional smooth projective toric variety $X$ and a $(2,2)$-dimensional strongly positive closed current $\mathscr{T}$ on $X$ with the following properties:
\begin{enumerate}[(1)]
\item The cohomology class of $\mathscr{T}$ satisfies
\[
\{\mathscr{T}\} \in H^4(X,\mathbb{Z})\slash\textrm{tors}~ \cap H^{2,2}(X).
\]
\item The current $\mathscr{T}$ is not a weak limit of the form
\[
\lim_{i \to \infty} \mathscr{T}_i, \quad \mathscr{T}_i=\sum_j \lambda_{ij} [Z_{ij}],
\]
where $\lambda_{ij}$ are nonnegative real numbers and $Z_{ij}$ are algebraic surfaces in $X$.
\end{enumerate}
\end{theorem}
The above current $\mathscr{T}$ generates an extremal ray of the cone of strongly positive closed currents on $X$: If $\mathscr{T}=\mathscr{T}_1+\mathscr{T}_2$ is any decomposition of $\mathscr{T}$ into strongly positive closed currents, then both $\mathscr{T}_1$ and $\mathscr{T}_2$ are nonnegative multiples of $\mathscr{T}$.
This extremality relates to $\textrm{HC}^+$ by the following application of Milman's converse to the Krein-Milman theorem, see Proposition \ref{Milman'sConverse} and
\cite[Proof of Proposition 5.2]{DemaillyHodge}.
\begin{proposition}\label{Milman'sConverse-Intro}
Let $X$ be an algebraic variety and let $\mathscr{T}$ be a $(p,p)$-dimensional current on $X$ of the form
\[
\mathscr{T}=\lim_{i \to \infty} \mathscr{T}_i, \quad \mathscr{T}_i=\sum_j \lambda_{ij} [Z_{ij}],
\]
where $\lambda_{ij}$ are nonnegative real numbers and $Z_{ij}$ are $p$-dimensional irreducible subvarieties of $X$.
If $\mathscr{T}$ generates an extremal ray of the cone of strongly positive closed currents on $X$, then
there are nonnegative real numbers $\lambda_i$ and $p$-dimensional irreducible subvarieties $Z_i \subseteq X$ such that
\[
\mathscr{T}=\lim_{i \to \infty} \lambda_i [Z_i].
\]
\end{proposition}
Therefore, if we assume that $\textrm{HC}^+$ holds for a smooth projective variety $X$, then every extremal strongly positive closed current with rational cohomology class can be approximated by positive multiples of integration currents along \emph{irreducible} subvarieties of $X$.
Lelong in \cite{Lelong} proved that the integration currents along irreducible analytic subsets are extremal, and asked whether those are the only extremal currents. Demailly in \cite{DemaillyHodge} found the first extremal strongly positive closed current on $\mathbb{C}\mathbb{P}^2$ with a support of real dimension 3, which, therefore, cannot be an integration current along any analytic set. Later on, Bedford noticed that many extremal currents occur in dynamical systems on several complex variables have fractal sets as their support, and extremal currents of this type were later generated in several works such as \cite{sibony, Guedj,sib-dinh-rigidity}. These extremal currents, though, were readily known to be a weak limit of integration currents by the methods of their construction. The first tropical approach to extremal currents was established in the PhD thesis of the first author \cite{Babaee}. He introduced the notion of tropical currents and deduced certain sufficient local conditions which implied extremality.
In Section \ref{SectionConstruction}, we provide a detailed construction of tropical currents. A \emph{tropical current} is a certain closed current of bidimension $(p,p)$ on the algebraic torus $(\mathbb{C}^*)^n$, which is associated to a tropical variety of dimension $p$ in $\mathbb{R}^n$. A tropical variety is a weighted rational polyhedral complex $\mathscr C$ which is \emph{balanced}, see Definition \ref{BalancingCondition}. The tropical current associated to $\mathscr C$, denoted by $\mathscr{T}_\mathscr{C}$, has support
\[
|\mathscr{T}_\mathscr{C}|= \textrm{Log}^{-1}(\mathscr C),
\]
where $\textrm{Log}$ is the map defined by
\[
\textrm{Log}: (\mathbb{C}^*)^n \longrightarrow \mathbb{R}^n, \quad \big(z_1,\ldots,z_n) \longmapsto (-{\log|z_1|},\ldots, -{\log|z_n|}\big).
\]
To construct $\mathscr{T}_\mathscr{C}$ from a weighted complex $\mathscr{C}$, for each $p$-dimensional cell $\sigma$ in $\mathscr{C}$ we consider a current $\mathscr{T}_\sigma$, the average of the integration currents along fibers of a natural fiberation over the real torus $\textrm{Log}^{-1}(\sigma) \longrightarrow (S^1)^{n-p}$.
The current $\mathscr{T}_{\mathscr C}$ is then defined by setting
\[
\mathscr{T}_{\mathscr C} = \sum_{\sigma} \text{w}_{\mathscr{C}}(\sigma) \mathscr{T}_\sigma,
\]
where the sum is over all $p$-dimensional cells in $\mathscr C$ and $\text{w}_{\mathscr{C}}(\sigma)$ is the corresponding weight.
In Theorem \ref{Main1}, we give the following criterion for the closedness of the resulting current $\mathscr{T}_\mathscr{C}$, cf. \cite[Theorem 3.1.8]{Babaee}.
\begin{theorem}\label{Main1-Intro}
A weighted complex $\mathscr C$ is balanced if and only if the current $\mathscr{T}_\mathscr{C}$ is closed.
\end{theorem}
In Section \ref{SectionFourier}, we prove the above criterion for closedness of $\mathscr{T}_\mathscr{C}$, as well as the following criterion for strong extremality of $\mathscr{T}_\mathscr{C}$.
A closed current $\mathscr{T}$ with measure coefficients is said to be \emph{strongly extremal} if any closed current $\mathscr{T}'$ with measure coefficients which has the same dimension and support as $\mathscr{T}$ is a constant multiple of $\mathscr{T}$.
(Note that if $\mathscr{T}$ is strongly positive and strongly extremal, then $\mathscr{T}$ generates an extremal ray in the cone of strongly positive closed currents.)
Similarly, a balanced weighted complex $\mathscr{C}$ is said to be \emph{strongly extremal} if any balanced weighted complex $\mathscr{C}'$ which has the same dimension and support as $\mathscr{C}$ is a constant multiple of $\mathscr{C}$.
In Theorem \ref{Main2}, we prove the following improvement of extremality results in \cite{Babaee}.
\begin{theorem}\label{Main2-Intro}
A non-degenerate tropical variety $\mathscr{C}$ is strongly extremal if and only if the tropical current $\mathscr{T}_\mathscr{C}$ is strongly extremal.
\end{theorem}
Here a tropical variety in $\mathbb{R}^n$ is said to be \emph{non-degenerate} if its support is contained in no proper subspace of $\mathbb{R}^n$.
We note that there is an abundance of strongly extremal tropical varieties. For example, the Bergman fan of any simple matroid is a strongly extremal tropical variety \cite[Theorem 38]{Huh}.
There are $376467$ nonisomorphic simple matroids on $9$ elements \cite{Mayhew-Royle}, producing that many strongly extremal strongly positive closed currents on $(\mathbb{C}^*)^8$. By Theorem \ref{Main3-Intro} below, all of them have distinct cohomology classes in one fixed toric compactification of $(\mathbb{C}^*)^8$, the one associated to the permutohedron \cite{Huh}. In fact, Demailly's first example of non-analytic extremal strongly positive current in \cite{DemaillyHodge} is a tropical current associated to the simplest nontrivial matroid, namely the rank $2$ simple matroid on $3$ elements.
In Section \ref{SectionToric}, we consider the trivial extension $\overline{\mathscr{T}}_\mathscr{C}$ of the tropical current $\mathscr{T}_\mathscr{C}$ to an $n$-dimensional smooth projective toric variety $X$ whose fan is \emph{compatible} with $\mathscr{C}$, see Definition \ref{DefinitionCompatible}.
According to Fulton and Sturmfels \cite{Fulton-Sturmfels}, cohomology classes of a complete toric variety bijectively correspond to balanced weighted fans compatible with the fan of the toric variety. In Theorem \ref{Main3}, we give a complete description of the cohomology class of $\overline{\mathscr{T}}_\mathscr{C}$ in $X$:
\begin{theorem}\label{Main3-Intro}
If $\mathscr{C}$ is a $p$-dimensional tropical variety compatible with the fan of $X$, then
\[
\{\overline{\mathscr{T}}_\mathscr{C}\}=\text{rec}(\mathscr{C}) \in H^{q,q}(X),
\]
where $\textrm{rec}(\mathscr C)$ is the \emph{recession} of $\mathscr C$ (recalled in Section \ref{SubsectionRecession}).
In particular, if all polyhedrons in $\mathscr{C}$ are cones in $\Sigma$, then
\[
\{\overline{\mathscr{T}}_\mathscr{C}\}=\mathscr{C} \in H^{q,q}(X).
\]
\end{theorem}
The current $\mathscr{T}$ in Theorem \ref{Main4-intro} is a current of the form $\overline{\mathscr{T}}_\mathscr{C}$, and Theorem \ref{Main3-Intro} plays an important role in justifying the claimed properties of $\mathscr{T}$.
In Section \ref{SectionLast}, we complete the proof of Theorem \ref{Main4-intro} by analyzing a certain Laplacian matrix associated to a $2$-dimensional tropical variety $\mathscr{C}$. According to Theorem \ref{Main3-Intro}, if $\mathscr{C}$ is compatible with the fan of an $n$-dimensional smooth projective toric variety $X$, we may view the cohomology class of $\overline{\mathscr{T}}_\mathscr{C}$ as a geometric graph $G=G(\mathscr{C}) \subseteq \mathbb{R}^n \setminus \{0\}$ with edge weights $w_{ij}$ satisfying the \emph{balancing condition}: At each of its vertex $u_i$ there is a real number $d_i$ such that
\[
d_iu_i=\sum_{u_i \sim u_j} w_{ij} u_j,
\]
where the sum is over all neighbors of $u_i$ in $G$.
We define the \emph{tropical Laplacian} of $\mathscr{C}$ to be the real symmetric matrix
$L_{G}$ with entries
\[
(L_{G})_{ij}:=\left\{\begin{array}{cl} d_i & \text{if $u_i=u_j$,} \\ -w_{ij} & \text{if $u_i \sim u_j$,} \\ 0 & \text{if otherwise,}\end{array}\right.
\]
where the diagonal entries $d_i$ are the real numbers satisfying
\[
d_i u_i = \sum_{u_i \sim u_j} w_{ij} u_j.
\]
When $G$ is the graph of a polytope with weights given by the Hessian of the volume of the dual polytope, the matrix $L_G$ was considered before in various contexts related to rigidity and polyhedral combinatorics \cite{Connelly,Filliman,Lovasz,Izmestiev}. In this case, $L_G$ is known to have exactly one negative eigenvalue, by the Alexandrov-Fenchel inequality. See, for example, \cite[Proposition 4]{Filliman} and \cite[Theorem A.10]{Izmestiev}.
In Proposition \ref{OneNegativeEigenvalue}, using the Hodge index theorem and the continuity of the cohomology class assignment, we show that $L_G$ has at most one negative eigenvalue if $\overline{\mathscr{T}}_{\mathscr{C}}$ is a weak limit of integration currents along irreducible surfaces in $X$.
The remainder of the paper is devoted to the construction of a strongly extremal tropical surface $\mathscr{C}$ whose tropical Laplacian has more than one negative eigenvalue.
For this we introduce two operations on weighted fans, $F \longmapsto F_{ij}^+$ (Section \ref{PlusConstruction}) and $F \longmapsto F_{ij}^-$ (Section \ref{MinusConstruction}), and repeatedly apply them to a geometric realization of the complete bipartite graph $K_{4,4} \subseteq \mathbb{R}^4$ to arrive at $\mathscr{C}$ with the desired properties. By the above Theorems \ref{Main1-Intro}, \ref{Main2-Intro}, and \ref{Main3-Intro}, the resulting tropical current $\overline{\mathscr{T}}_\mathscr{C}$ is strongly extremal strongly positive closed current which is not a weak limit of positive linear combinations of integration currents along subvarieties.
\section{Construction of tropical currents}\label{SectionConstruction}
\subsection{}
Let $\mathbb{C}^*$ be the group of nonzero complex numbers.
The \emph{logarithm map} is the homomorphism
\[
-\text{log}: \mathbb{C}^* \longrightarrow \mathbb{R}, \qquad z \longmapsto -\log |z|,
\]
and the \emph{argument map} is the homomorphism
\[
\text{arg}: \mathbb{C}^* \longrightarrow S^1, \qquad z \longmapsto z/|z|.
\]
The argument map splits the exact sequence
\[
\xymatrix{
0\ar[r]&S^1\ar[r]&\mathbb{C}^*\ar[r]^{-\text{log}}&\mathbb{R}\ar[r]&0,
}
\]
giving polar coordinates to nonzero complex numbers.
Under the chosen sign convention, the inverse image of $\mathbb{R}_{> 0}$ under the logarithm map is the punctured unit disk
\[
\mathbb{D}^*:=\{z \in \mathbb{C}^* \mid |z| <1\}.
\]
Let $N$ be a finitely generated free abelian group.
There are Lie group homomorphisms
\[
\xymatrix{
&T_N \ar[dr]^{\text{arg}\otimes_\mathbb{Z}1} \ar[dl]_{-\text{log}\otimes_\mathbb{Z}1}&\\
N_\mathbb{R}&&S_N,}
\]
called the \emph{logarithm map} and the \emph{argument map} for $N$ respectively, where
\begin{eqnarray*}
T_N&:=&\text{the complex algebraic torus $\mathbb{C}^* \otimes_\mathbb{Z} N$,}\\
S_N&:=&\text{the compact real torus $S^1 \otimes_\mathbb{Z} N$,}\\
N_\mathbb{R}&:=&\text{the real vector space $\mathbb{R} \otimes_\mathbb{Z} N$.}
\end{eqnarray*}
When $N$ is the group $\mathbb{Z}^n$ of integral points in $\mathbb{R}^n$, we denote the two maps by
\[
\xymatrix{
&(\mathbb{C}^*)^n \ar[dr]^{\text{Arg}} \ar[dl]_{\text{Log}}&\\
\mathbb{R}^n&&(S^1)^n.
}
\]
\subsection{}
A linear subspace of $\mathbb{R}^n$ is \emph{rational} if it is generated by a subset of $\mathbb{Z}^n$.
Corresponding to a $p$-dimensional rational subspace $H \subseteq \mathbb{R}^n$, there is a commutative diagram of split exact sequences
\[
\xymatrix{
&0 \ar[d]&0 \ar[d]&0 \ar[d]&\\
0 \ar[r]& S_{H \cap \mathbb{Z}^n} \ar[r] \ar[d]& (S^1)^n \ar[r] \ar@/_/[d]&S_{\mathbb{Z}^n/(H \cap \mathbb{Z}^n)} \ar[r] \ar[d]& 0\\
0 \ar[r]& T_{H \cap \mathbb{Z}^n} \ar[r] \ar[d]& (\mathbb{C}^*)^n \ar[r] \ar[d]^{\text{Log}} \ar@/_/[u]_{\text{Arg}}&T_{\mathbb{Z}^n/(H \cap \mathbb{Z}^n)} \ar[r] \ar[d]& 0\\
0 \ar[r]& H\ar[r]\ar[d] & \mathbb{R}^n \ar[r]\ar[d] &\mathbb{R}^n/H \ar[r] \ar[d]& 0,\\
&0&0&0&\\
}
\]
where the vertical surjections are the logarithm maps for $H \cap \mathbb{Z}^n$, $\mathbb{Z}^n$, and their quotient.
We define a Lie group homomorphism $\pi_H$ as the composition
\[
\pi_H:\xymatrix{ \text{Log}^{-1}(H) \ar[r]^{\quad\text{Arg}}& (S^1)^n \ar[r]& S_{\mathbb{Z}^n/(H \cap \mathbb{Z}^n)}}.
\]
The map $\pi_H$ is a submersion, equivariant with respect to the action of $(S^1)^n$. Its kernel is the closed subgroup
\[
\text{ker}(\pi_H)=T_{H \cap \mathbb{Z}^n} \subseteq (\mathbb{C}^*)^n.
\]
Each fiber of $\pi_H$ is a translation of the kernel by the action of $(S^1)^n$,
and in particular, each fiber $\pi_H^{-1}(x)$ is a $p$-dimensional closed complex submanifold of $(\mathbb{C}^*)^n$.
\begin{definition}
Let $\mu$ be a complex Borel measure on $S_{\mathbb{Z}^n/(H \cap \mathbb{Z}^n)}$.
We define a $(p,p)$-dimensional closed current $\mathscr{T}_H(\mu)$ on $(\mathbb{C}^*)^n$ by
\[
\mathscr{T}_H(\mu):=\int_{x \in S_{\mathbb{Z}^n/(H \cap \mathbb{Z}^n)}} \big[\pi_H^{-1}(x)\big] \ d\mu(x).
\]
When $\mu$ is the Haar measure on $S_{\mathbb{Z}^n/(H \cap \mathbb{Z}^n)}$ normalized by
\[
\int_{x \in S_{\mathbb{Z}^n/(H \cap \mathbb{Z}^n)}} d\mu(x)=1,
\]
we omit $\mu$ from the notation and write
\[
\mathscr{T}_H:=\mathscr{T}_H(\mu).
\]
\end{definition}
In other words, $\mathscr{T}_H(\mu)$ is obtained from the $0$-dimensional current $d\mu$ by
\[
\mathscr{T}_H(\mu) = \iota^H_{*} \big( \pi_H^* (d\mu) \big),
\]
where $\iota^H$ is the closed embedding and $\pi_H$ is the oriented submersion in the diagram
\[
\xymatrix{
\text{Log}^{-1}(H) \ar[r]^{\quad \iota^H} \ar[d]_{\pi_H}& (\mathbb{C}^*)^n\\
S_{\mathbb{Z}^n/(H \cap \mathbb{Z}^n)}. &
}
\]
Each fiber of $\pi_H$ is invariant under the action of $T_{H \cap \mathbb{Z}^n}$, and hence the current $\mathscr{T}_H(\mu)$ remains invariant under the action of $T_{H\cap \mathbb{Z}^n}$:
\[
\mathscr{T}_H(\mu)=t_* \big(\mathscr{T}_H(\mu)\big) = t^* \big(\mathscr{T}_H(\mu)\big), \qquad t \in T_{H \cap \mathbb{Z}^n}.
\]
The current $\mathscr{T}_H(\mu)$ is strongly positive if and only if $\mu$ is a positive measure.
\subsection{}
Let $A$ be a $p$-dimensional affine subspace of $\mathbb{R}^n$ parallel to the linear subspace $H$.
For $a \in A$, there is a commutative diagram of corresponding translations
\[
\xymatrix{
\text{Log}^{-1}(A) \ar[d]_{\text{Log}} \ar[r]^{e^a}& \text{Log}^{-1}(H) \ar[d]^{\text{Log}}\\
A \ar[r]^{-a}& H.
}
\]
We define a submersion $\pi_{A}$ as the composition
\[
\pi_{A}:\xymatrix{\text{Log}^{-1}(A) \ar[r]^{e^a \ } & \text{Log}^{-1}(H) \ar[r]^{\pi_{H} \ \ }&S_{\mathbb{Z}^n/(H \cap \mathbb{Z}^n)}.}
\]
The map $\pi_A$ does not depend on the choice of $a$, and
each fiber of $\pi_A$ is a $p$-dimensional closed complex submanifold of $(\mathbb{C}^*)^n$ invariant under the action of $T_{H \cap \mathbb{Z}^n}$.
\begin{definition}
Let $\mu$ be a complex Borel measure on $S_{\mathbb{Z}^n/H\cap \mathbb{Z}^n}$.
We define a $(p,p)$-dimensional closed current $\mathscr{T}_{A}(\mu)$ on $(\mathbb{C}^*)^n$ by
\[
\mathscr{T}_A(\mu):=\int_{x \in S_{\mathbb{Z}^n/(H \cap \mathbb{Z}^n)}} \big[\pi_A^{-1}(x)\big] \ d\mu(x).
\]
When $\mu$ is the normalized Haar measure on $S_{\mathbb{Z}^n/(H \cap \mathbb{Z}^n)}$,
we write
\[
\mathscr{T}_A:=\mathscr{T}_A(\mu).
\]
\end{definition}
The current $\mathscr{T}_A(\mu)$ is strongly positive if and only if $\mu$ is a positive measure,
and the construction is equivariant with respect to the action of $\mathbb{R}^n$ by translations:
\[
\mathscr{T}_{A-b}(\mu)=(e^{-b})^*\big(\mathscr{T}_{A}(\mu)\big), \qquad b \in \mathbb{R}^n.
\]
Note that $\mathscr{T}_A(\mu)$ has measure coefficients: For each relatively compact open subset $U \subseteq (\mathbb{C}^*)^n$, the restriction of $\mathscr{T}_A(\mu)|_U$ can be written in a unique way
\[
\mathscr{T}_A(\mu)|_U=\sum_{|I|=|J|=n-p} \mu_{IJ} \ dz_I \wedge d\bar z_J,
\]
where $z_1,\ldots,z_n$ are coordinate functions and $\mu_{IJ}$ are complex Borel measures on $U$.
This expression can be used to define the current $\mathbf{1}_B \mathscr{T}_A(\mu)$, where $\mathbf{1}_B$ is the characteristic function of a Borel subset $B \subseteq (\mathbb{C}^*)^n$. We cover the torus by relatively compact open subsets $U \subseteq (\mathbb{C}^*)^n$, and set
\[
\mathbf{1}_B\mathscr{T}_A(\mu)|_U:=\sum_{|I|=|J|=n-p} \mu_{IJ}|_B \ dz_I \wedge d\bar z_J.
\]
\subsection{}
A \emph{rational polyhedron} in $\mathbb{R}^n$ is an intersection of finitely many half-spaces of the form
\[
\langle u,m\rangle \ge c, \quad m \in (\mathbb{Z}^n)^\vee, \quad c \in \mathbb{R}.
\]
Let $\sigma$ be a $p$-dimensional rational polyhedron in $\mathbb{R}^n$. We define
\begin{eqnarray*}
\text{aff}(\sigma)&:=& \text{the affine span of $\sigma$},\\
\sigma^\circ \ &:=& \text{the interior of $\sigma$ in $\text{aff}(\sigma)$},\\
H_\sigma \ &:=& \text{the linear subspace parallel to $\text{aff}(\sigma)$}.
\end{eqnarray*}
The \emph{normal lattice} of $\sigma$ is the quotient group
\[
N(\sigma):=\mathbb{Z}^n/(H_\sigma \cap \mathbb{Z}^n).
\]
The normal lattice defines the $(n-p)$-dimensional vector spaces
\[
N(\sigma)_\mathbb{R}:=\mathbb{R} \otimes_\mathbb{Z} N(\sigma), \qquad N(\sigma)_\mathbb{C}:=\mathbb{C} \otimes_\mathbb{Z} N(\sigma).
\]
\begin{definition}
Let $\mu$ be a complex Borel measure on $S_{N(\sigma)}$.
\begin{enumerate}[(1)]
\item We define a submersion $\pi_\sigma$ as the restriction of $\pi_{\text{aff}(\sigma)}$ to $\text{Log}^{-1}(\sigma^\circ)$:
\[
\pi_\sigma: \text{Log}^{-1}(\sigma^\circ) \longrightarrow S_{N(\sigma)}.
\]
\item We define a $(p,p)$-dimensional current $\mathscr{T}_\sigma(\mu)$ on $(\mathbb{C}^*)^n$ by
\[
\mathscr{T}_\sigma(\mu):=\mathbf{1}_{\text{Log}^{-1}(\sigma)} \mathscr{T}_{\text{aff}(\sigma)}(\mu).
\]
\end{enumerate}
When $\mu$ is the normalized Haar measure on $S_{N(\sigma)}$, we write
\[
\mathscr{T}_\sigma:=\mathscr{T}_\sigma(\mu).
\]
\end{definition}
Each fiber $\pi_\sigma^{-1}(x)$ is a $p$-dimensional complex manifold, being an open subset of the $p$-dimensional closed complex submanifold $\pi_{\text{aff}(\sigma)}^{-1}(x) \subseteq (\mathbb{C}^*)^n$.
The closure $\overline{\pi^{-1}_\sigma(x)}$ is a manifold with piecewise smooth boundary, and
\[
\mathscr{T}_\sigma(\mu)= \int_{x \in S_{N(\sigma)}} \big[\overline{\pi^{-1}_\sigma(x)}\big]d\mu(x).
\]
In other words, $\mathscr{T}_\sigma(\mu)$ is the trivial extension to $(\mathbb{C}^*)^n$ of the pullback of the $0$-dimensional current $d\mu$ along the oriented submersion $\pi_\sigma$. We compute the boundary of $\mathscr{T}_\sigma(\mu)$ in Proposition \ref{BoundaryPolyhedron} below.
The construction is equivariant with respect to the action of $\mathbb{R}^n$ by translations:
\[
\mathscr{T}_{\sigma-b}(\mu)=(e^{-b})^*\big(\mathscr{T}_{\sigma}(\mu)\big), \qquad b \in \mathbb{R}^n.
\]
The current $\mathscr{T}_\sigma(\mu)$ is strongly positive if and only if the measure $\mu$ is positive, and
its support satisfies
\[
|\mathscr{T}_\sigma(\mu)| \subseteq |\mathscr{T}_\sigma|=\text{Log}^{-1}(\sigma) \subseteq (\mathbb{C}^*)^n.
\]
\subsection{}
A polyhedral complex in $\mathbb{R}^n$ is \emph{locally finite} if any compact subset of $\mathbb{R}^n$ intersects only finitely many cells.
\begin{proposition}\label{ConeCurrents}
If a $p$-dimensional rational polyhedron $\sigma$ is a union of $p$-dimensional rational polyhedrons $\sigma_i$ in a locally finite polyhedral complex,
then
\[
\mathscr{T}_\sigma(\mu)=\sum_{i} \mathscr{T}_{\sigma_i}(\mu).
\]
\end{proposition}
The sum is well-defined because the subdivision of $\sigma$ is locally finite.
\begin{proof}
Since $\sigma$ and $\sigma_i$ have the same affine span,
\[
\overline{\pi^{-1}_\sigma(x)} = \bigcup_{i}\ \overline{\pi^{-1}_{\sigma_i}(x)}, \qquad x \in S_{N(\sigma)},
\]
and hence
\[
\big[\overline{\pi^{-1}_\sigma(x)}\big] = \sum_{i} \big[\overline{\pi^{-1}_{\sigma_i}(x)}\big], \qquad x \in S_{N(\sigma)}.
\]
Integrating both sides over $x$, we have
\[
\mathscr{T}_\sigma(\mu)=\sum_{i} \mathscr{T}_{\sigma_i}(\mu).
\]
The change of the sum and the integral is justified by the local finiteness of the subdivision.
\end{proof}
The boundary of $\mathscr{T}_\sigma(\mu)$ has measure coefficients, and can be understood geometrically from the restrictions of the logarithm map for $\mathbb{Z}^n$ to fibers of $\pi_{\text{aff}(\sigma)}$:
\[
l_{\sigma,x}:\pi^{-1}_{\text{aff}(\sigma)}(x) \longrightarrow \text{aff}(\sigma), \qquad x \in S_{N(\sigma)}.
\]
Each $l_{\sigma,x}$ is a translation of the logarithm map for $H_\sigma \cap \mathbb{Z}^n$, and hence is a submersion.
We have
\[
\pi_\sigma^{-1}(x)=l_{\sigma,x}^{-1}(\sigma^\circ).
\]
Since $l_{\sigma,x}$ is a submersion, the closure of the inverse image is the inverse image of the closure.
In particular, the closure of $l_{\sigma,x}(\sigma^\circ)$ in the ambient torus is $l_{\sigma,x}^{-1}(\sigma)$. The closure has
the piecewise smooth boundary
\[
\partial \Big( l^{-1}_{\sigma,x}(\sigma)\Big)=\bigcup_\tau \ l_{\sigma,x}^{-1}(\tau),
\]
where the union is over all codimension $1$ faces $\tau$ of $\sigma$. The smooth locus of the boundary is the disjoint union
\[
\coprod_\tau \ l_{\sigma,x}^{-1}(\tau^\circ),
\]
where each component $l_{\sigma,x}^{-1}(\tau^\circ)$ is equipped with the orientation induced from the canonical orientation of the complex manifold $l_{\sigma,x}^{-1}(\sigma^\circ)$.
\begin{proposition}\label{BoundaryPolyhedron}
For any complex Borel measure $\mu$ on $S_{N(\sigma)}$,
\[
d\mathscr{T}_\sigma(\mu)=-\sum_{\tau \subset \sigma} \Bigg( \int_{x \in S_{N(\sigma)}} \big[l_{\sigma,x}^{-1}(\tau)\big] d\mu(x) \Bigg),
\]
where the sum is over all codimension $1$ faces $\tau$ of $\sigma$.
\end{proposition}
It follows that the support of $d\mathscr{T}_\sigma(\mu)$ satisfies
\[
|d\mathscr{T}_\sigma(\mu) | \subseteq |d\mathscr{T}_\sigma | = \bigcup_{\tau\subset \sigma} \ \text{Log}^{-1}(\tau) \subseteq (\mathbb{C}^*)^n.
\]
\begin{proof}
Subdividing $\sigma$ if necessary, we may assume that $\sigma$ is a manifold with corners.
By Stokes' theorem,
\[
d\big[l_{\sigma,x}^{-1}(\sigma)\big]=-\sum_{\tau\subset \sigma} \big[l_{\sigma,x}^{-1}(\tau)\big], \qquad x \in S_{N(\sigma)}.
\]
Since $\pi_\sigma^{-1}(x)=l_{\sigma,x}^{-1}(\sigma^\circ)$, we have
\[
d\mathscr{T}_\sigma(\mu)= \int_{x \in S_{N(\sigma)}} d\big[\overline{\pi^{-1}_\sigma(x)}\big]d\mu(x)=-\sum_{\tau\subset \sigma} \Bigg( \int_{x \in S_{N(\sigma)}} \big[l_{\sigma,x}^{-1}(\tau)\big] d\mu(x) \Bigg).
\]
\end{proof}
We consider the important special case when $\sigma$ is a $p$-dimensional \emph{unimodular cone} in $\mathbb{R}^n$, that is, a cone generated by part of a lattice basis $u_1,\ldots,u_p$ of $\mathbb{Z}^n$.
Let $\tilde x$ be an element of $(S^1)^n$, and consider the closed embedding given by the monomial map
\[
(\mathbb{C}^*)^p \longrightarrow (\mathbb{C}^*)^n, \qquad z \longmapsto \tilde x \cdot z^{[u_1,\ldots,u_p]},
\]
where $[u_1,\ldots,u_p]$ is the matrix with column vectors $u_1,\ldots,u_p$.
If $x$ is the image of $\tilde x$ in $S_{N(\sigma)}$ and $\tau$ is the cone generated by $u_2,\ldots,u_p$, then the map restricts to diffeomorphisms
\begin{eqnarray*}
\mathbb{C}^*\times (\mathbb{C}^*)^{p-1} &\simeq& \pi^{-1}_{\text{aff}(\sigma)}(x),\\
\mathbb{D}^* \times (\mathbb{D}^*)^{p-1} &\simeq&l_{\sigma,x}^{-1}(\sigma^\circ),\\
S^1 \times (\mathbb{D}^*)^{p-1} &\simeq& l^{-1}_{\sigma,x}(\tau^\circ).
\end{eqnarray*}
\subsection{}
A $p$-dimensional \emph{weighted complex} in $\mathbb{R}^n$ is a locally finite polyhedral complex $\mathscr{C}$ such that
\begin{enumerate}[(1)]
\item each inclusion-maximal cell $\sigma$ in $\mathscr{C}$ is rational,
\item each inclusion-maximal cell $\sigma$ in $\mathscr{C}$ is $p$-dimensional, and
\item each inclusion-maximal cell $\sigma$ in $\mathscr{C}$ is assigned a complex number $\text{w}_\mathscr{C}(\sigma)$.
\end{enumerate}
The weighted complex $\mathscr{C}$ is said to be \emph{positive} if,
for all $p$-dimensional cells $\sigma$ in $\mathscr{C}$,
\[
\text{w}_\mathscr{C}(\sigma) \ge 0.
\]
The \emph{support} $|\mathscr{C}|$ of $\mathscr{C}$ is the union of all $p$-dimensional cells of $\mathscr{C}$ with nonzero weight.
\begin{definition}
A $p$-dimensional weighted complex $\mathscr{C}'$ is a \emph{refinement} of $\mathscr{C}$ if
$|\mathscr{C}'|=|\mathscr{C}|$
and each $p$-dimensional cell $\sigma' \in \mathscr{C}'$ with nonzero weight is contained in some $p$-dimensional cell $\sigma \in \mathscr{C}$ with
\[
\text{w}_{\mathscr{C}'}(\sigma')=\text{w}_{\mathscr{C}}(\sigma).
\]
If $p$-dimensional weighted complexes $\mathscr{C}_1$ and $\mathscr{C}_2$ have a common refinement, we write
\[
\mathscr{C}_1 \sim \mathscr{C}_2.
\]
This defines an equivalence relation on the set of $p$-dimensional weighted complexes in $\mathbb{R}^n$.
\end{definition}
Note that any two $p$-dimensional weighted complexes in $\mathbb{R}^n$ can be added after suitable refinements of each.
This gives the set of equivalence classes of $p$-dimensional weighted complexes in $\mathbb{R}^n$ the structure of a complex vector space.
\begin{definition}
We define a $(p,p)$-dimensional current $\mathscr{T}_\mathscr{C}$ on $(\mathbb{C}^*)^n$ by
\[
\mathscr{T}_\mathscr{C}:=\sum_{\sigma} \text{w}_\mathscr{C}(\sigma)\ \mathscr{T}_\sigma,
\]
where the sum is over all $p$-dimensional cells in $\mathscr{C}$.
\end{definition}
For an explicit construction of $\mathscr{T}_\mathscr{C}$ involving coordinates, see \cite{Babaee}.
If $\mathscr{C}-b$ is the weighted complex obtained by translating $\mathscr{C}$ by $b \in \mathbb{R}^n$, then
\[
\mathscr{T}_{\mathscr{C}-b}=(e^{-b})^*(\mathscr{T}_\mathscr{C}).
\]
The current $\mathscr{T}_\mathscr{C}$ is strongly positive if and only if the weighted complex $\mathscr{C}$ is positive. The support of $\mathscr{T}_\mathscr{C}$ is the closed subset
\[
|\mathscr{T}_\mathscr{C}|=\text{Log}^{-1}|\mathscr{C}| \subseteq (\mathbb{C}^*)^n.
\]
Proposition \ref{ConeCurrents} implies that equivalent weighted complexes define the same current, and hence there is a map
from the set of equivalence classes of weighted complexes
\[
\varphi: \{\mathscr{C}\} \longmapsto \mathscr{T}_\mathscr{C}.
\]
For $p$-dimensional weighted complexes $\mathscr{C}_1,\mathscr{C}_2$ and complex numbers $c_1,c_2$, we have
\[
\mathscr{T}_{c_1 \{\mathscr{C}_1\}+c_2 \{\mathscr{C}_2\}} =c_1 \mathscr{T}_{\{\mathscr{C}_1\}}+c_2 \mathscr{T}_{\{\mathscr{C}_2\}}.
\]
It is clear that the kernel of the linear map $\varphi$ is trivial, and hence
\[
\mathscr{C}_1 \sim \mathscr{C}_2 \quad \text{if and only if} \quad \mathscr{T}_{\mathscr{C}_1}=\mathscr{T}_{\mathscr{C}_2}.
\]
\subsection{}
Let $\tau$ be a codimension $1$ face of a $p$-dimensional rational polyhedron $\sigma$.
The difference of $\sigma$ and $\tau$ generates a $p$-dimensional rational polyhedral cone containing $H_\tau$, defining a ray
in the normal space
\[
\text{cone}(\sigma-\tau)/H_\tau \subseteq H_\sigma/H_\tau \subseteq \mathbb{R}^n/H_\tau = N(\tau)_\mathbb{R}.
\]
We write $u_{\sigma/\tau}$ for the primitive generator of this ray in the lattice $N(\tau)$. For any $ b \in \mathbb{R}^n$,
\[
u_{\sigma-b/\tau-b}=u_{\sigma/\tau}.
\]
\begin{definition}\label{BalancingCondition}
A $p$-dimensional weighted complex $\mathscr{C}$ satisfies the \emph{balancing condition} at $\tau$ if
\[
\sum_{\sigma\supset \tau} \text{w}_{\mathscr{C}}(\sigma) u_{\sigma/\tau}=0
\]
in the complex vector space $N(\tau)_\mathbb{C}$, where the sum is over all $p$-dimensional cells $\sigma$ in $\mathscr{C}$ containing $\tau$ as a face.
A weighted complex is \emph{balanced} if it satisfies the balancing condition at each of its codimension $1$ cells.
\end{definition}
A \emph{tropical variety} is a positive and balanced weighted complex with finitely many cells, and a \emph{tropical current} is the current associated to a tropical variety.
Our first main result is the following criterion for the closedness of $\mathscr{T}_\mathscr{C}$, cf. \cite[Theorem 3.1.8]{Babaee}.
\begin{theorem}\label{Main1}
A weighted complex $\mathscr{C}$ is balanced if and only if $\mathscr{T}_{\mathscr{C}}$ is closed.
\end{theorem}
Theorem \ref{Main1} follows from an explicit formula for the boundary of $\mathscr{T}_\mathscr{C}$ in Theorem \ref{Main1General}:
\[
d \mathscr{T}_\mathscr{C}=-\sum_\tau \mathscr{A}_\tau\Big(\sum_{ \tau \subset \sigma} \text{w}_\mathscr{C}(\sigma)u_{\sigma/\tau}\Big).
\]
Here the first sum is over all codimension $1$ cells $\tau$ in $\mathscr{C}$, the second sum is over all $p$-dimensional cells $\sigma$ in $\mathscr{C}$ containing $\tau$, and $\mathscr{A}_\tau$ is an injective linear map constructed in Section \ref{SectionAveraging} using the averaging operator of the compact Lie group $S_{N(\tau)}$.
\subsection{}
Some properties of the current $\mathscr{T}_\mathscr{C}$ can be read off from the polyhedral geometry of $|\mathscr{C}|$.
We show that this is the case for the property of $\mathscr{T}_\mathscr{C}$ being strongly extremal.
\begin{definition}
A closed current $\mathscr{T}$ with measure coefficients is \emph{strongly extremal} if for any closed current $\mathscr{T}'$ with measure coefficients which has the same dimension and support as $\mathscr{T}$ there is a complex number $c$ such that $\mathscr{T}'=c \cdot \mathscr{T}$.
\end{definition}
If $\mathscr{T}$ is strongly positive and strongly extremal, then $\mathscr{T}$ generates an extremal ray in the cone of strongly positive closed currents:
If $\mathscr{T}=\mathscr{T}_1+\mathscr{T}_2$ is any decomposition of $\mathscr{T}$ into strongly positive closed currents, then
both $\mathscr{T}_1$ and $\mathscr{T}_2$ are nonnegative multiples of $\mathscr{T}$.
Indeed, we have
\[
|\mathscr{T}|=|\mathscr{T}+\mathscr{T}_1|=|\mathscr{T}+\mathscr{T}_2|,
\]
and hence there are constants $c_1$ and $c_2$ satisfying
\[
\mathscr{T}+\mathscr{T}_1=c_1 \cdot \mathscr{T}, \qquad \mathscr{T}+\mathscr{T}_2=c_2 \cdot \mathscr{T}, \qquad c_1,c_2 \ge 1.
\]
\begin{definition}
A balanced weighted complex $\mathscr{C}$ is \emph{strongly extremal} if for any balanced weighted complex $\mathscr{C}'$ which has the same dimension and support as $\mathscr{C}$ there is a complex number $c$ such that $\mathscr{C}' \sim c \cdot \mathscr{C}$.
\end{definition}
A weighted complex in $\mathbb{R}^n$ is said to be \emph{non-degenerate} if its support is contained in no proper affine subspace of $\mathbb{R}^n$.
Our second main result provides a new class of strongly extremal closed currents on $(\mathbb{C}^*)^n$.
\begin{theorem}\label{Main2}
A non-degenerate balanced weighted complex $\mathscr{C}$ is strongly extremal if and only if $\mathscr{T}_\mathscr{C}$ is strongly extremal.
\end{theorem}
This follows from Fourier analysis for tropical currents developed in the next section.
A $0$-dimensional weighted complex in $\mathbb{R}^1$ shows that the assumption of non-degeneracy is necessary in Theorem \ref{Main2}.
\begin{remark}
We note that there is an abundance of strongly extremal tropical varieties. For example, the Bergman fan of any simple matroid is a strongly extremal tropical variety; see \cite[Chapter III]{Huh} for the Bergman fan and the extremality.
Let $\mathscr{T}_M$ be the tropical current associated to the Bergman fan of a simple matroid $M$ on the ground set $\{0,1,\ldots,n\}$. If $M$ is representable over $\mathbb{C}$, then there are closed subvarieties $Z_i \subseteq (\mathbb{C}^*)^n$ of the ambient torus and positive real numbers $\lambda_i$ such that
\[
\mathscr{T}_M=\lim_{i \to \infty} \lambda_i [Z_i].
\]
It would be interesting to know whether $\mathscr{T}_M$ can be approximated as above when $M$ is not representable over $\mathbb{C}$. See \cite[Section 4.3]{Huh} for a related discussion.
\end{remark}
We end this section with a useful sufficient condition for the strong extremality of $\mathscr{C}$.
\begin{definition}
Let $\mathscr{C}$ be a $p$-dimensional weighted complex in $\mathbb{R}^n$.
\begin{enumerate}[(1)]
\item $\mathscr{C}$ is \emph{locally extremal} if, for every codimension $1$ cell $\tau$ in $\mathscr{C}$, every proper subset of
\[
\big\{u_{\sigma/\tau} \mid \text{$\sigma$ is a $p$-dimensional cell in $\mathscr{C}$ containing $\tau$ with nonzero $\text{w}_\mathscr{C}(\sigma)$}\big\}
\]
is linearly independent in the normal space $N(\tau)_\mathbb{R}$.
\item $\mathscr{C}$ is \emph{connected in codimension $1$} if, for every pair of $p$-dimensional cells $\sigma', \sigma''$ in $\mathscr{C}$ with nonzero weights, there are codimension $1$ cells $\tau_1,\ldots,\tau_l$ and $p$-dimensional cells $\sigma_0,\sigma_1,\ldots,\sigma_l$ in $\mathscr{C}$ with nonzero weights such that
\[
\sigma'=\sigma_0 \supset \tau_1 \subset \sigma_1 \supset \tau_2 \subset \sigma_2 \supset \cdots \supset \tau_l \subset \sigma_l= \sigma''.
\]
\end{enumerate}
\end{definition}
The following sufficient condition for the strong extremality of $\mathscr{C}$ was used as a definition of strong extremality of $\mathscr{C}$ in \cite{Babaee}.
\begin{proposition}\label{LocalGlobalExtremality}
If a balanced weighted complex $\mathscr{C}$ is locally extremal and connected in codimension $1$, then it is strongly extremal.
\end{proposition}
\begin{proof}
Let $\mathscr{C}'$ be a $p$-dimensional balanced weighted complex with $|\mathscr{C}|=|\mathscr{C}'|$.
We show that there is a complex number $c$ such that $\mathscr{C}' \sim c \cdot \mathscr{C}$.
Note that any refinement of $\mathscr{C}$ is balanced, locally extremal, and connected in codimension $1$. By replacing $\mathscr{C}$ and $\mathscr{C}'$ with their refinements, we may assume that
the set of $p$-dimensional cells in $\mathscr{C}$ with nonzero weights is the set of $p$-dimensional cells in $\mathscr{C}'$ with nonzero weights.
We may suppose that $\mathscr{C}$ is not equivalent to $0$.
Choose a $p$-dimensional cell $\sigma'$ in $\mathscr{C}$ with nonzero weight, and let $c$ be the complex number satisfying
\[
\text{w}_{\mathscr{C}'}(\sigma')=c \cdot \text{w}_\mathscr{C}(\sigma').
\]
We show that, for any other $p$-dimensional cell $\sigma''$ in $\mathscr{C}$ with nonzero weight,
\[
\text{w}_{\mathscr{C}'}(\sigma'')=c \cdot \text{w}_\mathscr{C}(\sigma'').
\]
Since $\mathscr{C}$ is connected in codimension $1$, there are codimension $1$ cells $\tau_1,\ldots,\tau_l$ and $p$-dimensional cells $\sigma_0,\sigma_1,\ldots,\sigma_l$ in $\mathscr{C}$ with nonzero weights such that
\[
\sigma'=\sigma_0 \supset \tau_1 \subset \sigma_1 \supset \tau_2 \subset \sigma_2 \supset \cdots \supset \tau_l \subset \sigma_l=\sigma''.
\]
By induction on the minimal distance $l$ between $\sigma'$ and $\sigma''$ in $\mathscr{C}$, we are reduced to the case when $l=1$, that is, when $\sigma'$ and $\sigma''$ have a common codimension $1$ face $\tau$. The balancing conditions for $\mathscr{C}$ and $\mathscr{C}'$ at $\tau$ give
\[
\sum_{\sigma \supset \tau} \Big(\text{w}_{\mathscr{C}'}(\sigma)-c\cdot \text{w}_\mathscr{C}(\sigma)\Big) u_{\sigma/\tau}=0,
\]
where the sum is over all $p$-dimensional cells $\sigma$ in $\mathscr{C}$ with nonzero weight that contain $\tau$. Since $\mathscr{C}$ is locally extremal, every proper subset of the vectors $u_{\sigma/\tau}$ is linearly independent, and hence
\[
\text{w}_{\mathscr{C}'}(\sigma')-c \cdot \text{w}_\mathscr{C}(\sigma')=0 \quad \text{implies} \quad \text{w}_{\mathscr{C}'}(\sigma'')-c \cdot \text{w}_\mathscr{C}(\sigma'')=0.
\]
\end{proof}
\section{Fourier analysis for tropical currents}\label{SectionFourier}
We develop necessary Fourier analysis on tori for proofs of Theorems \ref{Main1} and \ref{Main2}.
\subsection{}
Let $N$ be a finitely generated free abelian group, and let $M$ be the dual group $\text{Hom}_{\mathbb{Z}}(N,\mathbb{Z})$.
The \emph{one-parameter subgroup} corresponding to $u \in N$ is the homomorphism
\[
\lambda^u:S^1 \longrightarrow S_N,\qquad z \longmapsto z \otimes u.
\]
The \emph{character} corresponding to $m \in M$ is the homomorphism
\[
\chi^m:S_N \longrightarrow S^1, \qquad z\otimes u \longmapsto z^{\langle u,m\rangle},
\]
where $\langle u,m\rangle$ denotes the dual pairing between elements of $N$ and $M$.
We orient the unit circle $S^1$ as the boundary of the complex manifold $\mathbb{D}^*$, the punctured unit disc in $\mathbb{C}^*$.
This makes each one-parameter subgroup of $S_N$ a $1$-dimensional current on $S_N$:
The pairing between $\lambda^u$ and a smooth $1$-form $w$ is given by
\[
\langle \lambda^u,w\rangle:= \int_{S^1} (\lambda^u)^*w.
\]
We write $d\theta$ for the invariant $1$-form on $S^1$ with $\int_{S^1} d\theta =1$ corresponding to the chosen orientation, and $\mu_1$ for the normalized Haar measure on $S^1$.
For $m \in M$, we define a smooth $1$-form $w(m)$ on $S_N$ by
\[
w(m):= (\chi^m)^*d\theta.
\]
Then we have
\[
\big\langle \lambda^u,w(m)\big\rangle=\int_{S^1} (\lambda^u)^*(\chi^m)^* \ d\theta=\langle u,m\rangle.
\]
Taking linear combinations of $1$-dimensional currents and smooth $1$-forms, the above gives the dual pairing between $N_\mathbb{C}$
and the dual Lie algebra of $S_N$. In particular, for $u_1,u_2 \in N$ and any invariant $1$-form $w$, we have
\[
\langle \lambda^{u_1+u_2},w\rangle=\langle \lambda^{u_1},w\rangle+
\langle \lambda^{u_2},w\rangle.
\]
Note however that, in general, $\lambda^{u_1+u_2} \neq \lambda^{u_1}+\lambda^{u_2}$ as $1$-dimensional currents on $S_N$.
We write $x^*(w)$ for the pullback of a smooth $1$-form $w$ along the multiplication map
\[
\xymatrix{S_N \ar[r]^x& S_N}, \qquad x \in S_N.
\]
\begin{definition}
Let $u \in N$, $m \in M$, and $\nu$ be a complex Borel measure on $S_{N}$. \begin{enumerate}[(1)]
\item The \emph{$\nu$-average} of a smooth $1$-form $w$ on $S_N$ is the smooth $1$-form
\[
\mathscr{A}(w,\nu):= \int_{x \in S_N} x^* (w) \ d\nu(x).
\]
\item The \emph{$\nu$-average} of $\lambda^u$ is the $1$-dimensional current $\mathscr{A}(\lambda^u,\nu)$ on $S_N$ defined by
\[
\big\langle\mathscr{A}(\lambda^u,\nu),w\big\rangle:= \int_{S^1} (\lambda^u)^* \mathscr{A}(w,\nu).
\]
\item The \emph{$m$-th Fourier coefficient} of $\nu$ is the complex number
\[
\hat \nu(m):= \int_{x \in S_N} \chi^m \ d\nu(x)
\]
\end{enumerate}
When $\nu$ is the normalized Haar measure on $S_N$, we omit $\nu$ from the notation and write
\[
\mathscr{A}(w):=\mathscr{A}(w,\nu), \qquad \mathscr{A}(\lambda^u):= \mathscr{A}(\lambda^u,\nu).
\]
\end{definition}
We record here basic properties of the above objects.
Define
\[
\delta_k:=\begin{cases} 1& \text{if $k = 0$,}\\0&\text{if $k\neq 0$.}\end{cases}
\]
\begin{proposition}\label{PropositionFourier}
Let $u$ be an element of $N$, and let $m$ be an element of $M$.
\begin{enumerate}[(1)]
\item If $w$ is an invariant $1$-form on $S_N$, then
\[
\mathscr{A}(\chi^m w,\nu)=\hat \nu(m) \cdot \chi^m w.
\]
\item If $w$ is an invariant $1$-form on $S_N$, then
\[
\langle \lambda^u,\chi^m w\rangle=\delta_{\langle u,m\rangle} \cdot \langle \lambda^u,w\rangle.
\]
\item If $w$ is an invariant $1$-form on $S_N$, then
\[
\big\langle \mathscr{A}(\lambda^u,\nu),\chi^m w\big\rangle=\delta_{\langle u,m\rangle} \cdot \hat \nu(m) \cdot \langle \lambda^u, w \rangle.
\]
\end{enumerate}
\end{proposition}
\begin{proof}
Since $w$ is invariant and $\chi^m$ is a homomorphism, for each $x \in S_N$, we have
\[
x^*(\chi^m w)=x^*(\chi^m) \cdot x^*(w) = \chi^m(x) \ \chi^m \cdot w.
\]
Therefore,
\[
\mathscr{A}(\chi^m w,\nu)=\int_{x \in S_N} x^* (\chi^m w) \ d\nu(x)=\hat \nu(m) \cdot \chi^m w.
\]
This proves the first item.
The second item follows from the computation
\[
\langle \lambda^u,\chi^m w\rangle= \int_{S^1} (\lambda^u)^* (\chi^m w)= \int_{S^1} z^{\langle u,m\rangle} (\lambda^u)^* w.
\]
The last integral is zero unless $\langle u,m\rangle$ is zero, because $(\lambda^u)^* w$ is an invariant $1$-form.
The third item is a combination of the first two:
\begin{eqnarray*}
\big\langle \mathscr{A}(\lambda^u,\nu),\chi^m w\big\rangle
=\big\langle \lambda^u,\mathscr{A}(\chi^m w,\nu)\big\rangle
=\delta_{\langle u,m\rangle} \cdot \hat \nu(m) \cdot \big\langle \lambda^u,\chi^m w\big\rangle.
\end{eqnarray*}
\end{proof}
Consider the split exact sequence associated to a primitive element $u$ of $N$:
\[
\xymatrix{0 \ar[r] & S^1 \ar[r]^{\lambda^u} & S_N \ar[r]^{q_u\quad\ } & \text{coker}(\lambda^u) \ar[r] & 0.}
\]
Let $\mu$ be a complex Borel measure on the cokernel of $\lambda^u$, and let $\nu$
be the pullback of the product measure $\mu \times \mu_1$ under a splitting isomorphism
\[
S_N \simeq \text{coker}(\lambda^u) \times S^1.
\]
Each fiber of the submersion $q_u$ is a translations of the image of $\lambda^u$ in $S_N$, equipped with the orientation induced from that of $S^1$.
\begin{proposition}\label{GeometricI}
If $u$ is a primitive element of $N$, then
\[
\mathscr{A}(\lambda^u,\nu)=\int_{x \in \text{coker}(\lambda^u)} \big[q_u^{-1}(x)\big] d\mu(x).
\]
In particular, if $\mu$ is the normalized Haar measure on the cokernel of $\lambda^u$, then
\[
\mathscr{A}(\lambda^u)=\int_{x \in \text{coker}(\lambda^u)} \big[q_u^{-1}(x)\big] d\mu(x).
\]
\end{proposition}
\begin{proof}
By Fubini's theorem, for any smooth $1$-form $w$ on $S_N\simeq \text{coker}(\lambda^u) \times S^1$,
\begin{eqnarray*}
\big\langle \mathscr{A}(\lambda^u,\nu),w\big\rangle&=& \int_x \int_y \Bigg( \int_{S^1} (\lambda^u)^* x^* y^*w \Bigg) d\mu(x)\ d\mu_1(y)\\
&=& \int_x \Bigg( \int_{S^1} (\lambda^u)^* x^* w \Bigg) d\mu(x) \cdot \int_{y} d\mu_1(y)\\
&=& \int_x \Bigg( \int_{q_u^{-1}(x)} w \Bigg) d\mu(x).
\end{eqnarray*}
This shows the equality between $1$-dimensional currents
\[
\mathscr{A}(\lambda^u,\nu)=\int_{x \in \text{coker}(\lambda^u)} \big[q_u^{-1}(x)\big] d\mu(x).
\]
If $\mu$ is the normalized Haar measure on $\text{coker}(\lambda^u)$, then $\nu$ is the normalized Haar measure on $S_N$, and the second statement follows.
\end{proof}
In other words, when $u$ is a primitive element of $N$, $\mathscr{A}(\lambda^u,\nu)$ is the pullback of the $0$-dimensional current $d\mu$ along the oriented submersion $q_u$.
In general,
\[
\mathscr{A}(\lambda^u,\nu)=m_u \int_{x \in \text{coker}(\lambda^u)} \big[q_u^{-1}(x)\big] d\mu(x),
\]
where $m_u$ is the nonnegative integer satisfying
$u=m_u u'$ with $u'$ primitive.
\subsection{}\label{SectionAveraging}
Let $\tau$ be a rational polyhedron in $\mathbb{R}^n$.
Let $\pi_{\text{aff}(\tau)}$ is the submersion associated to $\text{aff}(\tau)$ and $\iota^{\text{aff}(\tau)}$ is the closed embedding in the diagram
\[
\xymatrix{
\text{Log}^{-1}\big(\text{aff}(\tau)\big) \ar[r]^{\qquad \iota^{\text{aff}(\tau)}} \ar[d]_{\pi_{\text{aff}(\tau)}} & (\mathbb{C}^*)^n\\
S_{N(\tau)}.&
}
\]
For $u \in N(\tau)$ and a complex Borel measure $\nu$ on $S_{N(\tau)}$, we define a current on $(\mathbb{C}^*)^n$ by
\[
\mathscr{A}_\tau(u,\nu):=\mathbf{1}_{\text{Log}^{-1}(\tau)}\ \iota^{\text{aff}(\tau)}_*\Big( \pi_{\text{aff}(\tau)}^* \ \mathscr{A}(\lambda^u,\nu) \Big).
\]
In other words, $\mathscr{A}_\tau(u,\nu)$ is the trivial extension of the pullback of the $\nu$-average of $\lambda^u$ along the oriented submersion $\pi_\tau$.
When $\nu$ is the normalized Haar measure on $S_{N(\tau)}$, we write
\[
\mathscr{A}_\tau(u):=\mathscr{A}_\tau(u,\nu).
\]
For any nonzero $u$, the support of $\mathscr{A}_\tau(u,\nu)$ satisfies
\[
\big|\mathscr{A}_\tau(u,\nu)\big|\subseteq \big|\mathscr{A}_\tau(u)\big|=\text{Log}^{-1}(\tau) \subseteq (\mathbb{C}^*)^n.
\]
\begin{proposition}\label{Linearity}
For any $u_1,u_2 \in N(\tau)$,
\[
\mathscr{A}_\tau(u_1+u_2)=\mathscr{A}_\tau(u_1)+\mathscr{A}_\tau(u_2).
\]
\end{proposition}
\begin{proof}
Since $\pi_\tau^*$ is linear, it is enough to check that $\mathscr{A}$ is linear.
Fourier coefficients of the normalized Haar measure $\nu$ on $S_{N(\tau)}$ are
\[
\hat \nu(m)=\begin{cases} 1& \text{if $m=0$,}\\ 0& \text{if $m \neq 0$.}\end{cases}
\]
Therefore, by Proposition \ref{PropositionFourier}, for any character $\chi^m$ and invariant $1$-form $w$ on $S_{N(\tau)}$,
\[
\big\langle \mathscr{A}(\lambda^{u_1+u_2}),\chi^mw \big\rangle = \begin{cases} \langle \lambda^{u_1},w\rangle+\langle \lambda^{u_2},w\rangle& \text{if $m=0$,}\\ 0& \text{if $m \neq 0$,}\end{cases}
\]
and
\[
\big\langle \mathscr{A}(\lambda^{u_1}),\chi^mw \big\rangle+\big\langle \mathscr{A}(\lambda^{u_2}),\chi^mw \big\rangle = \begin{cases} \langle \lambda^{u_1},w\rangle+\langle \lambda^{u_2},w\rangle& \text{if $m=0$,}\\ 0& \text{if $m \neq 0$.}\end{cases}
\]
The Stone-Weierstrass theorem shows that any smooth $1$-form on $S_{N(\tau)}$ can be uniformly approximated by linear combinations of $1$-forms of the form $\chi^m w$ with $w$ invariant, and hence the above implies
\[
\mathscr{A}(\lambda^{u_1+u_2})=\mathscr{A}(\lambda^{u_1})+\mathscr{A}(\lambda^{u_2}).
\]
\end{proof}
We note that the linear operators $\mathscr{A}_\tau$ and $\mathscr{A}$ are injective: By Proposition \ref{PropositionFourier}, for any element $m$ in the dual group $M(\tau):=N(\tau)^\vee$,
\[
\big\langle \mathscr{A}(\lambda^u),w(m) \big\rangle=\langle \lambda^u,w(m)\rangle=\langle u,m\rangle.
\]
It follows that $\mathscr{A}_\tau(u)=0$ if and only if $\mathscr{A}(\lambda^u)=0$ if and only if $u=0$.
\subsection{}
Let $\tau$ be a codimension $1$ face of a $p$-dimensional rational polyhedron $\sigma$ in $\mathbb{R}^n$.
Corresponding to each point $x \in S_{N(\sigma)}$, there is a commutative diagram of maps between smooth manifolds
\[
\xymatrix{
&&l_{\sigma,x}^{-1}(\sigma^\circ)\ar[d]&\\
&l_{\sigma,x}^{-1}(\tau^\circ) \ar[d] \ar[r]&\pi_{\text{aff}(\sigma)}^{-1}(x) \ar[d] \ar[dr]^{ l_{\sigma,x}}&&\\
&\text{Log}^{-1}(\tau^\circ) \ar[d]^{\pi_\tau} \ar[r]& \text{Log}^{-1}\big(\text{aff}(\sigma)\big) \ar[d]^{\pi_{\text{aff}(\sigma)}} \ar[r]_{\qquad l_{\text{aff}(\sigma)}}& \text{aff}(\sigma)\\
S^1 \ar[r]^{\lambda^{u_{\sigma/\tau}}}&S_{N(\tau)} \ar[r]^{q_{\sigma/\tau}}& S_{N(\sigma)}. &
}
\]
The maps $\pi_\tau$, $\pi_{\text{aff}(\sigma)}$ are submersions with oriented fibers, the maps $l_{\sigma,x}$, $l_{\text{aff}(\sigma)}$ are restrictions of the logarithm map, and
all unlabeled maps are inclusions between subsets of $(\mathbb{C}^*)^n$.
The dimensions of the above manifolds are depicted in the following diagram:
\[
\tiny
\xymatrix{
&&2p \ar[d]&\\
&2p-1 \ar[d] \ar[r]&2p \ar[d] \ar[dr]&&\\
&n+p-1 \ar[d] \ar[r]& n+p \ar[d] \ar[r]& p\\
1 \ar[r] &n-p+1 \ar[r]& n-p. &
}
\]
The bottom row is a split exact sequence of Lie groups, and there is a canonical isomorphism
\[
S_{N(\sigma)} \simeq \text{coker}(\lambda^{u_{\sigma/\tau}}).
\]
Each fiber of the submersion $q_{\sigma/\tau}$ has the orientation induced from that of $S^1$.
\begin{lemma}\label{OrientationLemma}
We have the following equality between currents on $\text{Log}^{-1}(\tau^\circ)$:
\[
\big[l_{\sigma,x}^{-1}(\tau^\circ)\big] = \pi_\tau^{*} \big[q_{\sigma/\tau}^{-1}(x)\big].
\]
\end{lemma}
\begin{proof}
By construction, the top square in the diagram is cartesian:
\[
l_{\sigma,x}^{-1}(\tau^\circ) =\text{Log}^{-1}(\tau^\circ) \cap \pi_{\text{aff}(\sigma)}^{-1}(x).
\]
This equality, together with the commutativity of the two squares, shows that
\[
l_{\sigma,x}^{-1}(\tau^\circ) = \pi_\tau^{-1} \big(q_{\sigma/\tau}^{-1}(x)\big).
\]
The left-hand side is oriented as a boundary of the complex manifold $l_{\sigma,x}^{-1}(\sigma^\circ)$, and the circle
$q_{\sigma/\tau}^{-1}(x)$ is oriented as a translate of the one-parameter subgroup $\lambda^{u_{\sigma,\tau}}$.
The canonical orientation on fibers of $\pi_\tau$ gives the orientation on the right-hand side.
We show that the two orientations agree. We do this explicitly after three reduction steps:
\begin{enumerate}[(1)]
\item It is enough to show this locally around any one point in $l_{\sigma,x}^{-1}(\tau^\circ)$. Therefore, we may assume that $\tau=\text{aff}(\tau)$.
\item By translation,
we may assume that the chosen point is the identity element of the ambient torus.
\item By monomial change of coordinates, we may assume that
\[
\tau=\text{span}(e_2,\ldots,e_p), \qquad \sigma=\text{cone}(e_1)+\tau.
\]
\end{enumerate}
Here $e_1,\ldots,e_n$ is the standard basis of $\mathbb{Z}^n$.
Recall that the punctured unit disc $\mathbb{D}^*$ maps to the positive real line $\mathbb{R}_{>0}$ under the logarithm map.
Under the above assumptions, the diagram reads
\[
\tiny
\xymatrix{
&&\mathbb{D}^* \times (\mathbb{C}^*)^{p-1} \times \{1\} \ar[d]&\\
&S^1 \times (\mathbb{C}^*)^{p-1} \times \{1\}\ar[d] \ar[r]& \mathbb{C}^* \times (\mathbb{C}^*)^{p-1} \times \{1\} \ar[d] \ar[dr]&&\\
&S^1 \times (\mathbb{C}^*)^{p-1} \times (S^1)^{n-p} \ar[d] \ar[r]& \mathbb{C}^* \times (\mathbb{C}^*)^{p-1} \times (S^1)^{n-p} \ar[d] \ar[r]& \mathbb{R} \times \mathbb{R}^{p-1} \times \{0\}\\
S^1 \times \{1\} \times \{1\} \ar[r] & S^1 \times \{1\} \times (S^1)^{n-p} \ar[r]& \{1\} \times \{1\}\times (S^1)^{n-p}. &
}
\]
From this diagram we see that the orientation on $l_{\sigma,x}^{-1}(\tau^\circ)$ as a boundary of $l_{\sigma,x}^{-1}(\sigma^\circ)$ agrees with the product of the orientation on $S^1$ and the canonical orientation on fibers of $\pi_\tau$.
\end{proof}
It follows that there is an equality between the trivial extensions to $(\mathbb{C}^*)^n$
\[
\big[l_{\sigma,x}^{-1}(\tau)\big]=\big[\overline{\pi_\tau^{-1} (q_{\sigma/\tau}^{-1}(x))}\big].
\]
\subsection{}
Let $\sigma$ be a $p$-dimensional rational polyhedron in $\mathbb{R}^n$, and let $\mu_\sigma$ be a complex Borel measure on $S_{N(\sigma)}$. For each codimension $1$ face $\tau$ of $\sigma$, consider the split exact sequence
\[
\xymatrix{
0 \ar[r] & S^1 \ar[r]^{\lambda^{u_{\sigma/\tau}}} & S_{N(\tau)} \ar[r]^{q_{\sigma/\tau}} & S_{N(\sigma)} \ar[r] & 0.
}
\]
Let $\nu_{\sigma/\tau}$ be the pullback of the product measure $\mu_\sigma \times \mu_1$ under a splitting isomorphism
\[
S_{N(\tau)} \simeq S_{N(\sigma)}\times S^1.
\]
\begin{proposition}\label{BoundaryComputation}
We have
\[
d\mathscr{T}_\sigma(\mu_\sigma)=-\sum_{\tau \subset \sigma}\mathscr{A}_\tau(u_{\sigma/\tau},\nu_{\sigma/\tau}),
\]
where the sum is over all codimension $1$ faces $\tau$ of $\sigma$.
In particular,
\[
d\mathscr{T}_\sigma=-\sum_{\tau \subset \sigma}\mathscr{A}_\tau(u_{\sigma/\tau})
\]
\end{proposition}
\begin{proof}
We start from the geometric representation of the boundary in Proposition \ref{BoundaryPolyhedron}. We have
\[
d\mathscr{T}_\sigma(\mu_\sigma)= -\sum_{\tau \subset \sigma} \Bigg(\int_{x \in S_{N(\sigma)}} \big[l_{\sigma,x}^{-1}(\tau)\big] d\mu_\sigma(x) \Bigg).
\]
Lemma \ref{OrientationLemma} and Proposition \ref{GeometricI} together give
\[
d\mathscr{T}_\sigma(\mu_\sigma)=-\sum_{\tau \subset \sigma} \Bigg( \int_{x \in S_{N(\sigma)}} \big[\overline{\pi_\tau^{-1} (q_{\sigma/\tau}^{-1}(x))}\big] \Bigg)=-\sum_{\tau \subset \sigma}\mathscr{A}_\tau(u_{\sigma/\tau},\nu_{\sigma/\tau}).
\]
If $\mu_\sigma$ is the normalized Haar measure on $S_{N(\sigma)}$, then $\nu_{\sigma/\tau}$ is the normalized Haar measure on $S_{N(\tau)}$ for all $\tau \subset \sigma$, and the second statement follows.
\end{proof}
Let $\sigma$ and $\tau$ be as above, and consider the dual exact sequences
\[
\xymatrix{
0 \ar[r]& \mathbb{Z} \ar[r]^{u_{\sigma/\tau}\quad } & N(\tau) \ar[r]& N(\sigma) \ar[r] & 0
}
\]
and
\[
\xymatrix{
0 \ar[r]& M(\sigma) \ar[r] & M(\tau) \ar[r]^{u_{\sigma/\tau}^\vee}& \mathbb{Z}^\vee \ar[r] & 0.
}
\]
The latter exact sequence shows that an element $m$ of $M(\tau)$ is in $M(\sigma)$
if and only if
\[
\langle u_{\sigma/\tau},m\rangle= 0.
\]
When $m$ satisfies this condition, the $m$-th Fourier coefficients of both $\nu_{\sigma/\tau}$ and $\mu_\sigma$ are defined.
\begin{proposition}\label{FourierCoefficient}
If an element $m$ of $M(\tau)$ is in $M(\sigma)$, then $\hat \nu_{\sigma/\tau}(m) = \hat \mu_\sigma(m)$.
\end{proposition}
\begin{proof}
Since $m \in M(\sigma)$, the character $\chi^m$ is constant along each fiber of $q_{\sigma/\tau}$. Therefore, by Fubini's theorem,
\[
\hat\nu_{\sigma/\tau}(m) = \int_x \chi^m \ d\mu(x) \cdot \int_{y} d\mu_1(y)= \hat \mu_{\sigma}(m).
\]
\end{proof}
The following formula for the boundary of $\mathscr{T}_\mathscr{C}$ directly implies Theorem \ref{Main1}.
\begin{theorem}\label{Main1General}
For any $p$-dimensional weighted complex $\mathscr{C}$ in $\mathbb{R}^n$,
\[
d \mathscr{T}_\mathscr{C}=-\sum_\tau \mathscr{A}_\tau\Big(\sum_{ \tau \subset \sigma} \text{w}_\mathscr{C}(\sigma)u_{\sigma/\tau}\Big),
\]
where the second sum is over all $p$-dimensional cells $\sigma$ containing $\tau$.
\end{theorem}
\begin{proof}
By Proposition \ref{BoundaryComputation}, we have
\[
d\mathscr{T}_\mathscr{C}=-\sum_\sigma \sum_{\tau \subset \sigma} \text{w}_\mathscr{C}(\sigma) \mathscr{A}_\tau(u_{\sigma/\tau}).
\]
Changing the order of summation and applying Proposition \ref{Linearity} gives
\[
d\mathscr{T}_\mathscr{C}=-\sum_\tau \mathscr{A}_\tau\Big(\sum_{ \tau \subset \sigma} \text{w}_\mathscr{C}(\sigma)u_{\sigma/\tau}\Big).
\]
\end{proof}
\subsection{}
Let $\mathscr{P}$ be a $p$-dimensional locally finite rational polyhedral complex in $\mathbb{R}^n$.
We choose a complex Borel measure $\mu_\sigma$ on $S_{N(\sigma)}$ for each $p$-dimensional cell $\sigma$ of $\mathscr{P}$, and define a current
\[
\mathscr{T}:=\sum_\sigma \mathscr{T}_\sigma(\mu_\sigma),
\]
where the sum is over all $p$-dimensional cells $\sigma$ in $\mathscr{P}$. The support of $\mathscr{T}$ satisfies
\[
|\mathscr{T}| \subseteq \text{Log}^{-1}|\mathscr{P}|.
\]
In fact, any $(p,p)$-dimensional closed current with measure coefficients and support in $\text{Log}^{-1}|\mathscr{P}|$ is equal to $\mathscr{T}$ for some choices of complex Borel measures $\mu_\sigma$, see Lemma \ref{SupportLemma}.
For each $\sigma$ and its codimension $1$ face $\tau$, there are inclusion maps
\[
\xymatrix{
M(\sigma) \ar[r] & M(\tau) \ar[r] & (\mathbb{Z}^n)^\vee,
}
\]
dual to the quotient maps
\[
\xymatrix{
\mathbb{Z}^n \ar[r] & N(\tau) \ar[r] & N(\sigma).
}
\]
Let $m$ be an element of $(\mathbb{Z}^n)^\vee$. For each $p$-dimensional cell $\sigma$ in $\mathscr{P}$, we set
\[
\text{w}_\mathscr{T}(\sigma,m):=\begin{cases} \hat \mu_\sigma(m) & \text{if $m \in M(\sigma)$,} \\ \quad 0 & \text{if $m \notin M(\sigma)$.}\end{cases}
\]
This defines $p$-dimensional weighted complexes $\mathscr{C}_\mathscr{T}(m)$ in $\mathbb{R}^n$ satisfying
\[
|\mathscr{C}_\mathscr{T}(m)| \subseteq |\mathscr{P}|.
\]
\begin{theorem}\label{ClosedBalanced}
The current $\mathscr{T}$ is closed if and only if $\mathscr{C}_\mathscr{T}(m)$ is balanced for all $m \in (\mathbb{Z}^n)^\vee$.
\end{theorem}
When all the measures $\mu_\sigma$ are invariant, $\mathscr{C}_\mathscr{T}(m)$ is zero for all nonzero $m$, and Theorem \ref{ClosedBalanced} is equivalent to Theorem \ref{Main1}.
The general case of Theorem \ref{ClosedBalanced} will be used in the proof of Theorem \ref{Main2}.
\begin{proof}
Let $\tau$ be a codimension $1$ cell in $\mathscr{P}$, and let $m$ be an element of $(\mathbb{Z}^n)^\vee$. If $m \notin M(\tau)$, then
for all $p$-dimensional cells $\sigma$ in $\mathscr{P}$ containing $\tau$,
\[
\text{w}_\mathscr{T}(\sigma,m)=0,
\]
and $\mathscr{C}_\mathscr{T}(m)$ trivially satisfies the balancing condition at $\tau$.
It remains to show that $\mathscr{T}$ is closed if and only if $\mathscr{C}_\mathscr{T}(m)$ satisfies the balancing condition at $\tau$ whenever $m \in M(\tau)$.
By Proposition \ref{BoundaryComputation}, we have the expression
\[
d\mathscr{T}=-\sum_\tau \sum_{\tau \subset \sigma} \mathscr{A}_\tau(u_{\sigma/\tau},\nu_{\sigma/\tau}),
\]
where the second sum is over all $p$-dimensional cell $\sigma$ containing $\tau$.
Therefore, $\mathscr{T}$ is closed if and only if, for each codimension $1$ cell $\tau$ of $\mathscr{P}$,
\[
\sum_{\tau \subset \sigma} \mathscr{A}_\tau(u_{\sigma/\tau}, \nu_{\sigma/\tau})=0.
\]
This happens if and only if, for each codimension $1$ cell $\tau$ of $\mathscr{P}$,
\[
\sum_{\tau \subset \sigma} \pi_\tau^* \ \mathscr{A}(\lambda^{u_{\sigma/\tau}}, \nu_{\sigma/\tau})=0.
\]
Since each $\pi_\tau^*$ is an injective linear map, the condition is equivalent to
\[
\sum_{\tau \subset \sigma} \mathscr{A}(\lambda^{u_{\sigma/\tau}}, \nu_{\sigma/\tau})=0 \quad \text{for each $\tau$}.
\]
By the Stone-Weierstrass theorem, any smooth $1$-form on $S_{N(\tau)}$ can be uniformly approximated by $1$-forms of the form $\chi^m w$, where $\chi^m$ is a character and $w$ is an invariant $1$-form on $S_{N(\tau)}$, and hence the above condition holds if and only if
\[
\sum_{\tau \subset \sigma} \Big\langle \mathscr{A}(\lambda^{u_{\sigma/\tau}}, \nu_{\sigma/\tau}), \chi^m w \Big\rangle=0 \quad \text{for each $\tau$},
\]
for all characters $\chi^m$ and all invariant $1$-forms $w$ on $S_{N(\tau)}$.
Using Propositions \ref{PropositionFourier} and \ref{FourierCoefficient},
the equation reads
\[
\sum_{\tau \subset \sigma}\text{w}_\mathscr{T}(\sigma,m) \ \langle \lambda^{u_{\sigma/\tau}},w\rangle=0.
\]
Finally, the dual pairing between $N(\tau)_\mathbb{C}$ and $M(\tau)_\mathbb{C}$ shows that the condition holds if and only if
the balancing condition
\[
\sum_{\tau \subset \sigma}\text{w}_\mathscr{T}(\sigma,m) \ u_{\sigma/\tau}=0
\]
is satisfied for all $\tau$ and all elements $m \in M(\tau)$.
\end{proof}
\subsection{}\label{ExtremalProof}
Theorem \ref{Main1} can be used to prove one direction of Theorem \ref{Main2}. If $\mathscr{C}'$ is a balanced weighted complex which has the same dimension and support as $\mathscr{C}$, then $\mathscr{T}_{\mathscr{C}'}$ is a closed current with measure coefficients which has the same dimension and support as $\mathscr{T}_\mathscr{C}$. Therefore, if $\mathscr{T}_\mathscr{C}$ is strongly extremal, then there is a constant $c$ such that
\[
\mathscr{T}_{\mathscr{C}'}=c \cdot \mathscr{T}_\mathscr{C}= \mathscr{T}_{c \cdot \mathscr{C}}.
\]
This implies
\[
\mathscr{C}' \sim c \cdot \mathscr{C},
\]
and hence $\mathscr{C}$ is strongly extremal.
We prove the other direction after three lemmas.
\begin{lemma}\label{NonDegenerate}
A $p$-dimensional weighted complex $\mathscr{C}$ in $\mathbb{R}^n$ is non-degenerate
if and only if
\[
\bigcap_\sigma M(\sigma)_\mathbb{R}=\{0\},
\]
where the intersection is over all $p$-dimensional cells in $\mathscr{C}$.
\end{lemma}
\begin{proof}
The non-degeneracy of $\mathscr{C}$ is equivalent to the exactness of
\[
\sum_\sigma H_\sigma \longrightarrow \mathbb{R}^n \longrightarrow 0,
\]
which is in turn equivalent to the exactness of
\[
0 \longrightarrow (\mathbb{R}^n)^\vee \longrightarrow \bigoplus_\sigma H_\sigma^\vee,
\]
where the sums are over all $p$-dimensional cells in $\mathscr{C}$.
The kernel of the latter map is the intersection of $M(\sigma)_\mathbb{R}$ in the statement of the lemma.
\end{proof}
\begin{lemma}\label{ProperSupport}
If the support of a balanced weighted complex $\mathscr{C}_1$ is properly contained in the support of a strongly extremal balanced weighted complex $\mathscr{C}_2$ of the same dimension, then $\mathscr{C}_1 \sim 0$.
\end{lemma}
\begin{proof}
The local finiteness of $\mathscr{C}_1$, $\mathscr{C}_2$ implies that there are only countably many cells in $\mathscr{C}_1$, $\mathscr{C}_2$. Therefore, there is a nonzero complex number $c_1$ such that
\[
\big|c_1\{ \mathscr{C}_1\}+\{\mathscr{C}_2\}\big|=\big|\mathscr{C}_2\big|.
\]
By the strong extremality of $\mathscr{C}_2$, there is a complex number $c_2$ with
\[
c_1\{ \mathscr{C}_1\}+\{\mathscr{C}_2\} = c_2 \{\mathscr{C}_2\}.
\]
Since the support of $\mathscr{C}_1$ is properly contained in the support of $\mathscr{C}_2$, the number $c_2$ should be $1$, and hence all the weights of $\mathscr{C}_1$ are zero.
\end{proof}
\begin{lemma}\label{SupportLemma}
Let $\mathscr{P}$ be a $p$-dimensional locally finite rational polyhedral complex in $\mathbb{R}^n$.
If the support of a $(p,p)$-dimensional current $\mathscr{T}$ with measure coefficients on $(\mathbb{C}^*)^n$ satisfies
\[
|\mathscr{T}| \subseteq \text{Log}^{-1}|\mathscr{P}|,
\]
then there are complex Borel measures $\mu_\sigma$ on $S_{N(\sigma)}$ such that
\[
\mathscr{T}=\sum_\sigma \mathscr{T}_\sigma(\mu_\sigma),
\]
where the sum is over all $p$-dimensional cells $\sigma$ in $\mathscr{P}$.
\end{lemma}
\begin{proof}
The second theorem on support \cite[Section III.2]{DemaillyBook1} implies that, for each $p$-dimensional cell $\sigma$ in $\mathscr{P}$, there is a complex Borel measure $\mu_\sigma$ on $S_{N(\sigma)}$ such that
\[
\mathscr{T}|_{\text{Log}^{-1}(\sigma^\circ)}=\pi_\sigma^*(d\mu_\sigma).
\]
The trivial extension of the right-hand side to $(\mathbb{C}^*)^n$ is by definition $\mathscr{T}_\sigma(\mu_\sigma)$, and hence
\[
\Big|\mathscr{T}-\sum_\sigma \mathscr{T}_\sigma(\mu_\sigma)\Big| \subseteq \bigcup_\tau \text{Log}^{-1}|\tau|,
\]
where the union is over all $(p-1)$-dimensional cells in $\mathscr{P}$.
Note that each $\text{Log}^{-1}|\tau|$ is contained in the closed submanifold
\[
\text{Log}^{-1}\big(\text{aff}(\tau)\big) \subseteq (\mathbb{C}^*)^n.
\]
Since this submanifold has Cauchy-Riemann dimension $p-1$, the first theorem on support \cite[Section III.2]{DemaillyBook1} implies that
\[
\mathscr{T}-\sum_\sigma \mathscr{T}_\sigma(\mu_\sigma)=0.
\]
\end{proof}
\begin{proof}[End of proof of Theorem \ref{Main2}]
Suppose $\mathscr{C}$ is non-degenerate and strongly extremal, and
let $\mathscr{T}$ be a closed current with measure coefficients which has the same dimension and support as $\mathscr{T}_\mathscr{C}$. Lemma \ref{SupportLemma} shows that there are complex Borel measures $\mu_\sigma$ on $S_{N(\sigma)}$ such that
\[
\mathscr{T}=\sum_\sigma \mathscr{T}_\sigma(\mu_\sigma),
\]
where the sum is over all $p$-dimensional cells $\sigma$ in $\mathscr{C}$.
For each $m \in (\mathbb{Z}^n)^\vee$, we construct the balanced weighted complexes $\mathscr{C}_\mathscr{T}(m)$ using Theorem \ref{ClosedBalanced}.
Since $\mathscr{C}$ is strongly extremal, there are complex numbers $c(m)$ such that
\[
\mathscr{C}_\mathscr{T}(m) = c(m) \cdot \mathscr{C}, \qquad m \in (\mathbb{Z}^n)^\vee.
\]
Since $\mathscr{C}$ is non-degenerate, Lemma \ref{NonDegenerate} shows that the support of $\mathscr{C}_\mathscr{T}(m)$ is \emph{properly} contained in the support of $\mathscr{C}$
for all nonzero $m \in (\mathbb{Z}^n)^\vee$.
Therefore
\[
\mathscr{C}_\mathscr{T}(m)=0, \qquad m \neq 0.
\]
In other words, the Fourier coefficient $\hat \mu_\sigma(m)$ is zero
for all $p$-dimensional cell $\sigma$ in $\mathscr{C}$ and all nonzero $m \in (\mathbb{Z}^n)^\vee$.
The measures $\mu_\sigma$ are determined by their Fourier coefficients, and hence each $\mu_\sigma$ is the invariant measure on $S_{N(\sigma)}$ with the normalization
\[
\int_{x \in S_{N(\sigma)}} d\mu_\sigma(x) = c(0).
\]
Therefore $\mathscr{T}=c(0) \cdot \mathscr{T}_\mathscr{C}$,
and the current $\mathscr{T}_\mathscr{C}$ is strongly extremal.
\end{proof}
\section{Tropical currents on toric varieties}\label{SectionToric}
\subsection{}
Let $X$ be an $n$-dimensional smooth projective complex toric variety containing $(\mathbb{C}^*)^n$, let $\Sigma$ be the fan of $X$, and let $p$ and $q$ be nonnegative integers satisfying $p+q=n$.
A cohomology class in $X$ gives a homomorphism from the homology group of complementary dimension to $\mathbb{Z}$, defining the Kronecker duality homomorphism
\[
\mathscr{D}_X:H^{2q}(X,\mathbb{Z}) \longrightarrow \text{Hom}_\mathbb{Z}\big(H_{2q}(X,\mathbb{Z}),\mathbb{Z}\big), \qquad c \longmapsto \big(a \longmapsto \text{deg} (c \cap a)\big).
\]
The homomorphism $\mathscr{D}_X$ is, in fact, an isomorphism.
Since the homology group is generated by the classes of $q$-dimensional torus orbit closures, the duality identifies cohomology classes with certain $\mathbb{Z}$-valued functions on the set of $p$-dimensional cones in $\Sigma$, that is, with certain integral weights assigned to the $p$-dimensional cones in $\Sigma$.
The relation between homology classes of $q$-dimensional torus orbit closures of $X$ translates to the balancing condition on the integral weights on the $p$-dimensional cones in $\Sigma$ \cite[Theorem 2.1]{Fulton-Sturmfels}.
\begin{theorem}\label{KroneckerDuality}
The Kronecker duality gives isomorphisms between abelian groups
\[
H^{2q}(X,\mathbb{Z}) \simeq \text{Hom}\big(H_{2q}(X,\mathbb{Z}),\mathbb{Z}\big) \simeq \big\{\text{$p$-dimensional balanced integral weights on $\Sigma$}\big\},
\]
\end{theorem}
The vanishing theorem of Danilov says that the cohomology group $H^{i}(X,\Omega_X^{j})$ vanishes when $i \neq j$ \cite[Theorem 9.3.2]{Cox-Little-Schenck}.
Therefore, by the Hodge decomposition theorem,
there is an induced isomorphism between complex vector spaces
\[
\mathscr{D}_{X,\mathbb{C}}:H^{q,q}(X) \longrightarrow \big\{\text{$p$-dimensional balanced weights on $\Sigma$}\big\}.
\]
In other words, the Kronecker duality identifies elements of $H^{q,q}(X)$ with $p$-dimensional balanced weighted complexes in $\Sigma$.
Explicitly, for a smooth closed form $\varphi$ of degree $(q,q)$,
\[
\mathscr{D}_{X,\mathbb{C}}:\{\varphi\} \longmapsto \Big( \gamma \longmapsto \int_{V(\gamma)} \varphi\Big),
\]
where $V(\gamma)$ is the $q$-dimensional torus orbit closure in $X$ corresponding to a $p$-dimensional cone $\gamma$ in $\Sigma$.
Let $w_0$ be the smooth positive $(1,1)$-form on $X$ corresponding to a fixed torus equivariant projective embedding
\[
\phi: X \longrightarrow \mathbb{P}^N.
\]
The \emph{trace measure} of a $(p,p)$-dimensional positive current $\mathscr{T}$ on $X$ is the positive Borel measure
\[
\text{tr}(\mathscr{T})=\text{tr}(\mathscr{T},w_0):=\frac{1}{p!} \mathscr{T} \wedge w_0^p.
\]
The trace measure of a positive current on an open subset of $X$ is defined in the same way using the restriction of $w_0$.
\begin{proposition}\label{Finiteness}
If $\mathscr{C}$ is a $p$-dimensional positive weighted complex in $\mathbb{R}^n$ with finitely many cells, then the trace measure of the positive current $\mathscr{T}_\mathscr{C}$ is finite.
\end{proposition}
\begin{proof}
Let $\sigma$ be a $p$-dimensional rational polyhedron in $\mathbb{R}^n$, and recall that each fiber $\pi_\sigma^{-1}(x)$ is an open subset of the $p$-dimensional closed subvariety $\pi_{\text{aff}(\sigma)}^{-1}(x) \subseteq (\mathbb{C}^*)^n$.
By Wirtinger's theorem \cite[Chapter 1]{Griffiths-Harris}, the normalized volume of $\pi_{\text{aff}(\sigma)}^{-1}(x)$ with respect to $w_0$ is the degree of the closure
\[
d_\sigma:=\text{deg}\Bigg( \overline{\pi_{\text{aff}(\sigma)}^{-1}(x)}^X \subseteq \mathbb{P}^N\Bigg).
\]
This integer $d_\sigma$ is independent of $x \in S_{N(\sigma)}$, because the projective embedding $\phi$ is equivariant and fibers of $\pi_{\text{aff}(\sigma)}$ are translates of each other under the action of $(S^1)^n$.
It follows that $\text{tr}(\mathscr{T}_\sigma) \le d_\sigma$, and hence
\[
\text{tr}(\mathscr{T}_\mathscr{C}) \le \sum_\sigma \text{w}_\mathscr{C}(\sigma) d_\sigma,
\]
where the sum is over all $p$-dimensional cells $\sigma$ in $\mathscr{C}$.
\end{proof}
Let $\mathscr{C}$ be a $p$-dimensional weighted complex in $\mathbb{R}^n$ with finitely many cells.
Proposition \ref{Finiteness} shows that $X$ is covered by coordinate charts $(\Omega,z)$ such that
\[
\mathscr{T}_\mathscr{C}|_{\Omega \cap (\mathbb{C}^*)^n}=\sum_{|I|=|J|=k} \mu_{IJ}\ dz_I \wedge d\bar z_J,
\]
where $\mu_{IJ}$ are complex Borel measures on $\Omega \cap (\mathbb{C}^*)^n$.
It follows that the current $\mathscr{T}_\mathscr{C}$ admits the \emph{trivial extension}, the current $\overline{\mathscr{T}}_\mathscr{C}$ on $X$ defined by
\[
\overline{\mathscr{T}}_\mathscr{C}|_{\Omega}=\sum_{|I|=|J|=k} \nu_{IJ} \ dz_I \wedge d\bar z_J,
\]
where $\nu_{IJ}$ are complex Borel measures on $\Omega$ given by $ \nu_{IJ}(-)=\mu_{IJ}\big(-\cap\hspace{0.5mm} (\mathbb{C}^*)^n\big)$.
\begin{lemma}\label{LinearCombination}
If $\mathscr{C}$ is a balanced weighted complex with finitely many cells, then
there are complex numbers $c_1,\ldots,c_l$ and positive balanced weighted complexes $\mathscr{C}_1,\ldots,\mathscr{C}_l$ with finitely many cells such that
\[
\mathscr{T}_\mathscr{C}=\sum_{i=1}^l c_i \ \mathscr{T}_{\mathscr{C}_i}.
\]
\end{lemma}
\begin{proof}
Let $\mathscr{C}_p$ be the set of $p$-dimensional cells in $\mathscr{C}$, and consider the complex vector space
\[
W:=\Big\{\text{w}:\mathscr{C}_p \longrightarrow \mathbb{C} \mid \text{$\text{w}$ satisfies the balancing condition}\Big\}.
\]
Since the balancing condition is defined over the real numbers, $W$ is spanned by elements of the form $\text{w}:\mathscr{C}_p \longrightarrow \mathbb{R}$.
Therefore it is enough to show the following statement: If $\mathscr{C}$ is a balanced weighted complex with real weights and finitely many cells, then $\mathscr{T}_\mathscr{C}$ can be written as a difference
\[
\mathscr{T}_\mathscr{C}=\mathscr{T}_\mathscr{A}-\mathscr{T}_\mathscr{B},
\]
where $\mathscr{A}$ and $\mathscr{B}$ are positive balanced weighted complexes with finitely many cells.
We construct the weighted complexes $\mathscr{A}$ and $\mathscr{B}$ from $\mathscr{C}$ as follows. Let $|\mathscr{A}|$ be the union
\[
|\mathscr{A}|:=\bigcup_{\sigma \in \mathscr{C}_p} \ \text{aff}(\sigma),
\]
and note that there is a refinement of $\mathscr{C}$ that extends to a finite rational polyhedral subdivision of $|\mathscr{A}|$. Choose any such refinement $\mathscr{C}'$ of $\mathscr{C}$ and a subdivision $\mathscr{A}$ of $|\mathscr{A}|$. For each $p$-dimensional cell $\gamma$ in $\mathscr{A}$, we set
\[
\text{w}_\mathscr{A}(\gamma):=\max_{\sigma \in \mathscr{C}_p} \big|\text{w}_\mathscr{C}(\sigma)\big|, \qquad \text{w}_\mathscr{B}(\gamma):=\text{w}_\mathscr{A}(\gamma)-\text{w}_{\mathscr{C}'}(\gamma).
\]
This makes $\mathscr{A}$ and $\mathscr{B}$ positive weighted complexes satisfying
\[
\mathscr{T}_\mathscr{C}=\mathscr{T}_\mathscr{A}-\mathscr{T}_\mathscr{B}.
\]
It is easy to see that $\mathscr{A}$ is balanced, and $\mathscr{B}$ is balanced because $\mathscr{A}$ and $\mathscr{C}$ are balanced.
\end{proof}
\begin{proposition}\label{ToricClosed}
If $\mathscr{C}$ is a balanced weighted complex with finitely many cells, then the trivial extension $\overline{\mathscr{T}}_\mathscr{C}$ is a closed current on $X$.
\end{proposition}
\begin{proof}
We use Lemma \ref{LinearCombination} to express $\mathscr{T}_\mathscr{C}$ as a linear combination
\[
\mathscr{T}_\mathscr{C}=\sum_{i=1}^l c_i\ \mathscr{T}_{\mathscr{C}_i},
\]
where $c_i$ are complex numbers and $\mathscr{C}_i$ are positive balanced weighted complexes with finitely many cells. By taking the trivial extension we have
\[
\overline{\mathscr{T}}_\mathscr{C}=\sum_{i=1}^l c_i\ \overline{\mathscr{T}}_{\mathscr{C}_i}.
\]
By Theorem \ref{Main1}, each $\mathscr{T}_{\mathscr{C}_i}$ is a positive closed current on the open subset $(\mathbb{C}^*)^n \subseteq X$. Since each $\mathscr{C}_i$ has finitely many cells, Proposition \ref{Finiteness} shows that Skoda's extension theorem \cite[Section III.2]{DemaillyBook1} applies to the positive closed current $\mathscr{T}_{\mathscr{C}_i}$. It follows that $d\overline{\mathscr{T}}_{\mathscr{C}_i}=0$, and hence
\[
d\overline{\mathscr{T}}_\mathscr{C}=\sum_{i=1}^l c_i\ d\overline{\mathscr{T}}_{\mathscr{C}_i}=0.
\]
\end{proof}
Any $(p,p)$-dimensional closed current $\mathscr{T}$ on $X$ defines a linear functional on $H^{p,p}(X)$:
\[
\mathscr{T} \longmapsto \Big(\psi \longmapsto \langle \mathscr{T},\psi\rangle\Big).
\]
Composing the above map with the Poincar\'e-Serre duality $H^{p,p}(X)^\vee \simeq H^{q,q}(X)$, we have
\[
\mathscr{T} \longmapsto \{\mathscr{T}\} \in H^{q,q}(X).
\]
The element $\{\mathscr{T}\}$ is the \emph{cohomology class} of $\mathscr{T}$.
In particular, a $p$-dimensional balanced weighted complex $\mathscr{C}$ with finitely many cells defines a cohomology class $\{\overline{\mathscr{T}}_\mathscr{C}\}$, which we may view as a $p$-dimensional balanced weighted complex via Theorem \ref{KroneckerDuality}.
We compare two balanced weighted complexes in Theorem \ref{Main3}.
\subsection{}\label{SubsectionRecession}
Let $\mathscr{C}$ be a $p$-dimensional balanced weighted complex in $\mathbb{R}^n$ with finitely many cells.
The \emph{recession cone} of a polyhedron $\sigma$ is the convex polyhedral cone
\[
\text{rec}(\sigma)=\{b \in \mathbb{R}^n \mid \sigma+b\subseteq \sigma\} \subseteq H_\sigma.
\]
If $\sigma$ is rational, then $\text{rec}(\sigma)$ is rational, and if $\sigma$ is a cone, then $\sigma=\text{rec}(\sigma)$.
\begin{definition}\label{DefinitionCompatible}
We say that $\mathscr{C}$ is \emph{compatible} with $\Sigma$ if $\text{rec}(\sigma) \in \Sigma$ for all $\sigma \in \mathscr{C}$.
\end{definition}
There is a subdivision of $\mathscr{C}$ that is compatible with a subdivision of $\Sigma$, see \cite{Gil-Sombra}.
\begin{definition}
For each $p$-dimensional cone $\upsilon$ in $\Sigma$, we define
\[
\text{w}_{\text{rec}(\mathscr{C})}(\gamma):= \sum_{\sigma} \text{w}_\mathscr{C}(\sigma),
\]
where the sum is over all $p$-dimensional cells $\sigma$ in $\mathscr{C}$ whose recession cone is $\gamma$.
\end{definition}
This defines a $p$-dimensional weighted complex $\text{rec}(\mathscr{C},\Sigma)$, the \emph{recession} of $\mathscr{C}$ in $\Sigma$. When $\mathscr{C}$ is compatible with $\Sigma$, we write
\[
\text{rec}(\mathscr{C}):=\text{rec}(\mathscr{C},\Sigma).
\]
As suggested by the notation, the recession of $\mathscr{C}$ does not depend on $\Sigma$ when $\mathscr{C}$ is compatible with $\Sigma$. More precisely, if $\mathscr{C}_1 \sim \mathscr{C}_2$ and if $\mathscr{C}_i$ is compatible with a complete fan $\Sigma_i$ for $i=1,2$, then
\[
\text{rec}(\mathscr{C}_1,\Sigma_1) \sim \text{rec}(\mathscr{C}_2,\Sigma_2).
\]
\begin{theorem}\label{Main3}
If $\mathscr{C}$ is a $p$-dimensional tropical variety compatible with $\Sigma$, then
\[
\{\overline{\mathscr{T}}_\mathscr{C}\}=\text{rec}(\mathscr{C}) \in H^{q,q}(X).
\]
In particular, if all polyhedrons in $\mathscr{C}$ are cones in $\Sigma$, then
\[
\{\overline{\mathscr{T}}_\mathscr{C}\}=\mathscr{C} \in H^{q,q}(X).
\]
\end{theorem}
The remainder of this section is devoted to the proof of Theorem \ref{Main3}.
\subsection{}
Let $\sigma$ be a $p$-dimensional rational polyhedron in $\mathbb{R}^n$. If $\text{rec}(\sigma) \in \Sigma$,
we consider the corresponding torus invariant affine open subset
\[
U_{\text{rec}(\sigma)} := \text{Spec}\Big(\mathbb{C}[\text{rec}(\sigma)^\vee \cap \mathbb{Z}^n]\Big) \subseteq X.
\]
We write $p'$ for the dimension of the recession cone of $\sigma$, and $K_\sigma$ for the span of the recession cone of $\sigma$:
\[
p':=\dim\big(\text{rec}(\sigma)\big), \qquad K_\sigma:=\text{span}\big(\text{rec}(\sigma)\big) \simeq \mathbb{R}^{p'}.
\]
There are morphisms between fans
\[
\big(\text{rec}(\sigma) \subseteq K_\sigma\big) \longrightarrow \big(\text{rec}(\sigma) \subseteq H_\sigma\big) \longrightarrow \big(\text{rec}(\sigma) \subseteq \mathbb{R}^n\big).
\]
Since $X$ is smooth, $\text{rec}(\sigma) \in \Sigma$ implies that $\text{rec}(\sigma)$ is unimodular, and the induced map between affine toric varieties fits into the commutative diagram
\[
\small
\xymatrix{
\overline{ T_{K_\sigma \cap \mathbb{Z}^n} }^{U_{\text{rec}(\sigma)}} \ar[r] \ar[d]^{\varphi^1_\sigma}& \overline{ T_{H_\sigma \cap \mathbb{Z}^n} }^{U_{\text{rec}(\sigma)}} \ar[r] \ar[d]^{\varphi^2_\sigma}& U_{\text{rec}(\sigma)} \ar[d]^{\varphi^3_\sigma}\\
\mathbb{C}^{p'} \ar[r]& \mathbb{C}^{p'} \times (\mathbb{C}^*)^{p-p'} \ar[r] & \mathbb{C}^{p'} \times (\mathbb{C}^*)^{n-p'},
}
\]
where $\varphi^1_\sigma,\varphi^2_\sigma,\varphi^3_\sigma$ are isomorphisms between toric varieties and the horizontal maps are equivariant closed embeddings.
We write $z_{\text{rec}(\sigma)}$ for the distinguished point of $U_{\text{rec}(\sigma)}$ corresponding to the semigroup homomorphism
\[
\text{rec}(\sigma)^\vee \cap \mathbb{Z}^n \longrightarrow \mathbb{C}, \qquad m \longmapsto \begin{cases} 1 & \text{if $m \in \sigma^\perp$,} \\ 0 & \text{if $m \notin \sigma^\perp$.}\end{cases}
\]
The isotropy subgroup of the distinguished point is $T_{K_\sigma \cap \mathbb{Z}^n} \subseteq (\mathbb{C}^*)^n$, and we may identify
$T_{N(\text{rec}(\sigma))}$ with the closed torus orbit of $U_{\text{rec}(\sigma)}$ by the map
\[
T_{N(\text{rec}(\sigma))} \longrightarrow U_{\text{rec}(\sigma)}, \qquad t \longmapsto t \cdot z_{\text{rec}(\sigma)}.
\]
Under the above commutative diagram,
\[
\xymatrix{
z_{\text{rec}(\sigma)} \ar[r] \ar[d]& z_{\text{rec}(\sigma)} \ar[r] \ar[d]& z_{\text{rec}(\sigma)} \ar[d]\\
0_{ \mathbb{C}^{p'}} \ar[r]& 0_{ \mathbb{C}^{p'}} \times 1_{(\mathbb{C}^*)^{p-p'}} \ar[r]& 0_{ \mathbb{C}^{p'}} \times 1_{(\mathbb{C}^*)^{n-p'}}.
}
\]
The following observation forms the basis of the proof of Theorem \ref{Main3}.
\begin{lemma}\label{Compactness}
If $\text{rec}(\sigma) \in \Sigma$, then
\[
\overline{\text{Log}^{-1}(\sigma)}^X \subseteq U_{\text{rec}(\sigma)}.
\]
\end{lemma}
\begin{proof}
Note that the isomorphism $\varphi^1_\sigma$ restricts to the homeomorphism
$\overline{\pi_{\text{rec}(\sigma)}^{-1}(1)}^{U_{\text{rec}(\sigma)}} \simeq \overline{\mathbb{D}}^{p'}$, where $\overline{\mathbb{D}}$ is the closed unit disc in $\mathbb{C}$.
Write $\Phi$ for the action of $(S^1)^n$ on $U_{\text{rec}(\sigma)}$, and observe that
\[
\Phi\Bigg((S^1)^n \times \pi_{\text{rec}(\sigma)}^{-1}(1)\Bigg)=\bigcup_{x \in S_{N(\text{rec}(\sigma))}} \pi^{-1}_{\text{rec}(\sigma)}(x)
=\text{Log}^{-1}\big(\text{rec}(\sigma)^\circ\big).
\]
This shows that
\[
\Phi\Bigg((S^1)^n \times \overline{\pi_{\text{rec}(\sigma)}^{-1}(1)}^{U_{\text{rec}(\sigma)}}\Bigg)=\overline{\Phi\Big((S^1)^n \times \pi_{\text{rec}(\sigma)}^{-1}(1)\Big)}^{U_{\text{rec}(\sigma)}}=\overline{\text{Log}^{-1}\big(\text{rec}(\sigma)^\circ\big)}^{U_{\text{rec}(\sigma)}},
\]
where the compactness of $\overline{\pi_{\text{rec}(\sigma)}^{-1}(1)}^{U_{\text{rec}(\sigma)}}$ is used in the first equality.
Since the logarithm map is a submersion, the above implies
\[
\Phi\Bigg((S^1)^n \times \overline{\pi_{\text{rec}(\sigma)}^{-1}(1)}^{U_{\text{rec}(\sigma)}}\Bigg)=\overline{\text{Log}^{-1}\big(\text{rec}(\sigma)\big)}^{U_{\text{rec}(\sigma)}}.
\]
Therefore, the set on the right-hand side is compact. We use this to prove that $\overline{\text{Log}^{-1}(\sigma)}^{U_{\text{rec}(\sigma)}}$ is compact, and hence
\[
\overline{\text{Log}^{-1}(\sigma)}^{X}=\overline{\text{Log}^{-1}(\sigma)}^{U_{\text{rec}(\sigma)}} \subseteq U_{\text{rec}(\sigma)}.
\]
Let $\Delta$ be a bounded polyhedron in the Minkowski-Weyl decomposition
$\sigma=\Delta+\text{rec}(\sigma)$.
Write $\Psi$ for the action of $\mathbb{R}^n$ on $U_{\text{rec}(\sigma)}$, and observe that
\[
\Psi\Bigg(\Delta \times \text{Log}^{-1}\big(\text{rec}(\sigma)\big)\Bigg)
= \bigcup_{b \in \Delta} \text{Log}^{-1}\big(b+\text{rec}(\sigma)\big)= \text{Log}^{-1}\big(\sigma\big).
\]
This shows that
\[
\Psi\Bigg(\Delta \times \overline{\text{Log}^{-1}\big(\text{rec}(\sigma)\big)}^{U_{\text{rec}(\sigma)}}\Bigg)=\overline{\Psi\Big(\Delta \times \text{Log}^{-1}\big(\text{rec}(\sigma)\big)\Big)}^{U_{\text{rec}(\sigma)}}=\overline{\text{Log}^{-1}(\sigma)}^{U_{\text{rec}(\sigma)}},
\]
where the compactness of $\overline{\text{Log}^{-1}\big(\text{rec}(\sigma)\big)}^{U_{\text{rec}(\sigma)}}$ is used in the first equality.
Therefore, the set on the right-hand side is compact.
\end{proof}
Let $\mathscr{C}$ be a $p$-dimensional balanced weighted complex in $\mathbb{R}^n$ with finitely many cells.
\begin{proposition}\label{ToricExtremality}
If $\mathscr{C}$ is non-degenerate, strongly extremal, and compatible with $\Sigma$, then $\overline{\mathscr{T}}_\mathscr{C}$ is a strongly extremal closed current on $X$.
\end{proposition}
\begin{proof}
Write $D_\rho$ for the torus invariant prime divisor in $X$ corresponding to a $1$-dimensional cone $\rho$ in $\Sigma$. We note that, for any $p$-dimensional rational polyhedron $\sigma$ in $\mathscr{C}$, the subset
\[
D_\rho \cap \overline{\text{Log}^{-1}\big(\text{aff}(\sigma)\big)}^{U_{\text{rec}(\sigma)}} \subseteq U_{\text{rec}(\sigma)}
\]
is either empty or a closed submanifold of Cauchy-Riemann dimension $p-1$.
The subset is nonempty if and only if $\text{rec}(\sigma)$ contains $\rho$, and in this case, for any $b \in \text{aff}(\sigma)$, we have the commutative diagram
\[
\small
\xymatrix{
D_\rho \cap \overline{\text{Log}^{-1}\big(\text{aff}(\sigma)\big)}^{U_{\text{rec}(\sigma)}} \ar[r] \ar[d]^\simeq&U_{\text{rec}(\sigma)} \ar[d]^{\varphi_\sigma^3}\\
\mathbb{C}^{p'-1} \times (\mathbb{C}^*)^{p-p'} \times (S^1)^{n-p} \ar[r]^{\qquad \quad e^{-b}}& \mathbb{C}^{p'} \times (\mathbb{C}^*)^{n-p'}.
}
\]
Let $\mathscr{T}$ be a closed current on $X$ with measure coefficients which has the same dimension and support as $\overline{\mathscr{T}}_\mathscr{C}$.
By Theorem \ref{Main2}, there is a complex number $c$ such that
\[
\mathscr{T}|_{(\mathbb{C}^*)^n}- c \cdot \mathscr{T}_\mathscr{C}=0.
\]
This implies that
\[
|\mathscr{T}-c \cdot \overline{\mathscr{T}}_\mathscr{C}| \subseteq \bigcup_{\rho,\sigma} \Bigg(D_\rho \cap \overline{\text{Log}^{-1}(\sigma)}^{X} \Bigg),
\]
where the union is over all pairs of $1$-dimensional cone $\rho$ in $\Sigma$ and $p$-dimensional cell $\sigma$ in $\mathscr{C}$. By Lemma \ref{Compactness}, we have
\[
|\mathscr{T}-c \cdot \overline{\mathscr{T}}_\mathscr{C}| \subseteq \bigcup_{\rho,\sigma}\Bigg(D_\rho \cap \overline{\text{Log}^{-1}\big(\text{aff}(\sigma)\big)}^{U_{\text{rec}(\sigma)}} \Bigg).
\]
The above commutative diagram shows that the right-hand side is a finite union of submanifolds of Cauchy-Riemann dimension $p-1$:
\[
\bigcup_{\rho,\sigma}\Bigg(D_\rho \cap \overline{\text{Log}^{-1}\big(\text{aff}(\sigma)\big)}^{U_{\text{rec}(\sigma)}} \Bigg) \simeq \bigcup_{\rho,\sigma}\Bigg(\mathbb{C}^{p'-1} \times (\mathbb{C}^*)^{p-p'} \times (S^1)^{n-p} \Bigg).
\]
By the first theorem on support \cite[Section III.2]{DemaillyBook1}, this implies
\[
\mathscr{T}-c \cdot \overline{\mathscr{T}}_\mathscr{C}=0.
\]
\end{proof}
\subsection{}
Let $D_1,\ldots,D_p$ be the torus invariant prime divisors in $X$ corresponding to distinct $1$-dimensional cones $\rho_1,\ldots,\rho_p$ in $\Sigma$.
We fix a positive integer $l \le p$.
\begin{lemma}\label{Transversal}
Let $\sigma$ be a $p$-dimensional rational polyhedron in $\mathbb{R}^n$, $x \in S_{N(\sigma)}$, $b \in \text{aff}(\sigma)$.
\begin{enumerate}[(1)]
\item If $\text{rec}(\sigma) \in \Sigma$, then $D_1,\ldots,D_{l}$ intersect transversally
with the smooth subvariety
\[
\overline{ \pi_{\text{aff}(\sigma)}^{-1}(x) }^{U_{\text{rec}(\sigma)}} \subseteq U_{\text{rec}(\sigma)},
\]
and this intersection is nonempty if and only if $\text{rec}(\sigma)$ contains $\rho_1,\ldots,\rho_l$.
\item If $\text{rec}(\sigma) \in \Sigma$ and $\text{rec}(\sigma)$ contains $\rho_1,\ldots,\rho_p$, then
\[
D_1 \cap \cdots \cap D_p \cap \overline{ \pi_{\text{aff}(\sigma)}^{-1}(x) }^{U_{\text{rec}(\sigma)}} =\Big\{e^{-b} \cdot x \cdot z_{\text{rec}(\sigma)}\Big\}.
\]
\item If $\text{rec}(\sigma) \in \Sigma$ and $\text{rec}(\sigma)$ contains $\rho_1,\ldots,\rho_p$, then the above intersection point is contained in the relative interior of
\[
\overline{ \pi_\sigma^{-1}(x) }^{U_{\text{rec}(\sigma)}} \subseteq \overline{ \pi_{\text{aff}(\sigma)}^{-1}(x) }^{U_{\text{rec}(\sigma)}}.
\]
\end{enumerate}
\end{lemma}
\begin{proof}
It is enough to prove the assertions when $x$ is the identity and $\sigma$ contains the origin.
In this case, we have $\text{aff}(\sigma)=H_\sigma$ and $\text{rec}(\sigma) \subseteq \sigma$.
If $\text{rec}(\sigma) \in \Sigma$, then $\text{rec}(\sigma)$ is unimodular, and there is a commutative diagram
\[
\small
\xymatrix{
\overline{\pi^{-1}_{\text{aff}(\sigma)}(1)}^{U_{\text{rec}(\sigma)}} \ar[d]^{\varphi^2_\sigma} \ar[r]& U_{\text{rec}(\sigma)} \ar[d]^{\varphi_\sigma^3}\\
\mathbb{C}^{p'}\times (\mathbb{C}^*)^{p-p'} \ar[r]&\mathbb{C}^{p'}\times (\mathbb{C}^*)^{n-p'}.
}
\]
If $\text{rec}(\sigma)$ does not contain $\rho_i$, then $D_i$ is disjoint from $U_{\text{rec}(\sigma)}$.
If $\text{rec}(\sigma)$ contains $\rho_1,\ldots,\rho_l$, then
\[
D_1 \cap \cdots \cap D_l \cap \overline{ \pi_{\text{aff}(\sigma)}^{-1}(x) }^{U_{\text{rec}(\sigma)}} \simeq \mathbb{C}^{p'-l}\times (\mathbb{C}^*)^{p-p'}.
\]
If furthermore $l=p$, then $N(\sigma)=N(\text{rec}(\sigma))$, and the above intersection is the single point
\[
\Big\{z_{\text{rec}(\sigma)} \Big\}\simeq \Big\{0_{\mathbb{C}^p} \times 1_{(\mathbb{C}^*)^{n-p}}\Big\}.
\]
This point is contained in the relative interior of
\[
\Bigg(\overline{\pi^{-1}_{\text{rec}(\sigma)}(1)}^{U_{\text{rec}(\sigma)}} \subseteq \overline{\pi^{-1}_{\text{aff}(\sigma)}(1)}^{U_{\text{rec}(\sigma)}} \Bigg) \simeq \Bigg(\overline{\mathbb{D}}^p \subseteq \mathbb{C}^p \Bigg),
\]
Since $\text{rec}(\sigma) \subseteq \sigma$, the point is contained in the relative interior of
\[
\overline{ \pi_\sigma^{-1}(1) }^{U_{\text{rec}(\sigma)}} \subseteq \overline{ \pi_{\text{aff}(\sigma)}^{-1}(1) }^{U_{\text{rec}(\sigma)}}.
\]
\end{proof}
The wedge product between positive closed currents will play an important role in the proof of Theorem \ref{Main3}.
We briefly review the definition here, referring \cite{DemaillyBook1} and \cite{Dinh-Sibony} for details.
Write $d=\partial+\overline\partial$ for the usual decomposition of the exterior derivative on $X$, and set
\[
d^c:=\frac{1}{2\pi i}\big(\partial-\overline\partial\big).
\]
Let $u$ be a plurisubharmonic function on an open subset $U\subseteq X$, and let $\mathscr{T}$ be a positive closed current on $U$.
Since $\mathscr{T}$ has measure coefficients, $u\mathscr{T}$ is a well-defined current on $U$ if $u$ is locally integrable with respect to $\text{tr}(\mathscr{T})$. In this case, we define
\[
dd^c(u) \wedge \mathscr{T} := dd^c(u\mathscr{T}).
\]
The wedge product is a positive closed current on $U$, and it vanishes identically when $u$ is pluriharmonic.
Let $\mathscr{D}$ be a positive closed current on $U$ of degree $(1,1)$.
We define $\mathscr{D} \wedge \mathscr{T}$ as above, using open subsets $U_i \subseteq U$ covering $U$ and plurisubharmonic functions $u_i$ on $U_i$ satisfying
\[
\mathscr{D}|_{U_i}=dd^cu_i.
\]
The wedge product does not depend on the choice of the open covering and local potentials, and it extends linearly to the case when $\mathscr{D}$ is \emph{almost positive}, that is, when $\mathscr{D}$ can be written as the sum of a positive closed current and a smooth current. If $\mathscr{D}_1,\ldots,\mathscr{D}_l$ are almost positive closed current on $U$ of degree $(1,1)$ satisfying the integrability condition, we define
\[
\mathscr{D}_1 \wedge \mathscr{D}_2 \wedge \ldots \wedge \mathscr{D}_l \wedge \mathscr{T}:=\mathscr{D}_1 \wedge \Big( \mathscr{D}_2 \wedge \ldots \wedge (\mathscr{D}_l \wedge \mathscr{T}) \Big).
\]
Let $\sigma$ be a $p$-dimensional rational polyhedron compatible with $\Sigma$, and write $\mu_\sigma$ be the normalized Haar measure on $S_{N(\sigma)}$.
If $\text{rec}(\sigma)$ is $p$-dimensional, we define a closed embedding
\[
\iota_\sigma: S_{N(\sigma)} \longrightarrow X, \qquad t \longmapsto e^{-b} \cdot t \cdot z_{\text{rec}(\sigma)}, \qquad b \in \text{aff}(\sigma).
\]
In this case, the isotropy subgroup of the distinguished point is $T_{H_\sigma \cap \mathbb{Z}^n} \subseteq (\mathbb{C}^*)^n$, and the closed embedding does not depend on the choice of $b$.
\begin{proposition}\label{Wedge}
If $\mathscr{C}$ is a $p$-dimensional tropical variety compatible with $\Sigma$, then
\[
[D_1] \wedge \ldots \wedge [D_l] \wedge \overline{\mathscr{T}}_\mathscr{C}
\]
is a well-defined strongly positive closed current on $X$. When $l=p$, we have
\[
[D_1] \wedge \ldots \wedge [D_p] \wedge \overline{\mathscr{T}}_\mathscr{C}= \sum_\sigma \text{w}_\mathscr{C}(\sigma) \iota_{\sigma*} (d\mu_\sigma),
\]
where the sum is over all $p$-dimensional cells $\sigma$ in $\mathscr{C}$ such that $\text{rec}(\sigma)=\text{cone}(\rho_1,\ldots,\rho_p)$.
\end{proposition}
\begin{proof}
For a $p$-dimensional cell $\sigma$ in $\mathscr{C}$, let $f^\sigma_i$ be the local equation for $D_i$ on the affine chart $U_{\text{rec}(\sigma)}$.
By Lemma \ref{Transversal}, for each $x$, the divisors $D_1,\ldots,D_l$ transversally intersect the smooth subvariety
\[
\overline{ \pi_{\text{aff}(\sigma)}^{-1}(x) }^{U_{\text{rec}(\sigma)}} \subseteq U_{\text{rec}(\sigma)}.
\]
Therefore, the Poincar\'e-Lelong formula repeatedly applies to $f_1^\sigma,\ldots,f_l^\sigma$ to show that
\[
dd^c \log |f_1^\sigma| \wedge \ldots \wedge dd^c \log|f_l^\sigma|\wedge \overline{\mathscr{T}}_{\text{aff}(\sigma)}|_{U_{\text{rec}(\sigma)}}
=\int_{x \in S_{N(\sigma)}} [\Pi_{\sigma,x}] \ d\mu_\sigma(x),
\]
where $\Pi_{\sigma,x}$ is the smooth subvariety
\[
\Pi_{\sigma,x}:=D_1 \cap \ldots \cap D_l \cap \overline{\pi_{\text{aff}(\sigma)}^{-1}(x)}^{U_{\text{rec}(\sigma)}} \subseteq U_{\text{rec}(\sigma)}.
\]
We apply the above analysis to each $p$-dimensional cell $\sigma$ in $\mathscr{C}$.
By Lemma \ref{Compactness}, the support of $\overline{\mathscr{T}}_\sigma$ is contained in the open subset $U_\text{rec}(\sigma) \subseteq X$, and hence
\[
[D_1] \wedge \ldots \wedge [D_l] \wedge \overline{\mathscr{T}}_\mathscr{C}
=
\sum_\sigma \text{w}_\mathscr{C}(\sigma) \int_{x \in S_{N(\sigma)}} \mathbf{1}_{\overline{\text{Log}^{-1}(\sigma)}^{U_{\text{rec}(\sigma)}}} [\Pi_{\sigma,x}] \ d\mu_\sigma(x),
\]
When $l=p$, the integrand can be computed using Lemma \ref{Transversal}:
\[
\mathbf{1}_{\overline{\text{Log}^{-1}(\sigma)}^{U_{\text{rec}(\sigma)}}} [\Pi_{\sigma,x}] =
\left\{
\begin{array}{cc}
{[}\Pi_{\sigma,x}] & \text{if $\text{rec}(\sigma)=\text{cone}(\rho_1,\ldots,\rho_p)$},\\
0 & \text{if $\text{rec}(\sigma)\neq \text{cone}(\rho_1,\ldots,\rho_p)$}.
\end{array}\right.
\]
Therefore, we have
\[
[D_1] \wedge \ldots \wedge [D_p] \wedge \overline{\mathscr{T}}_\mathscr{C}
= \sum_\sigma \text{w}_\mathscr{C}(\sigma) \iota_{\sigma*} (d\mu_\sigma),
\]
where the sum is over all $p$-dimensional cells $\sigma$ in $\mathscr{C}$ such that $\text{rec}(\sigma)=\text{cone}(\rho_1,\ldots,\rho_p)$.
\end{proof}
\subsection{}
We begin the proof of Theorem \ref{Main3}. Fix a positive integer $l \le p$, and let
\begin{eqnarray*}
\rho_1,\ldots,\rho_p &:=& \text{distinct $1$-dimensional cones in $\Sigma$},\\
D_1,\ldots,D_p&:=& \text{torus invariant divisors of $\rho_1,\ldots,\rho_p$},\\
L_1,\ldots,L_p&:=& \text{hermitian line bundles on $X$ corresponding to $D_1,\ldots,D_p$},\\
w_1,\ldots,w_p&:=& \text{Chern forms of the line bundles $L_1,\ldots,L_p$}.
\end{eqnarray*}
If $s_i$ is a holomorphic section of $\mathcal{O}_X(D_i)$ that defines $D_i$, then
the Poincar\'e-Lelong formula says that
\[
dd^c \log|s_i|=[D_i]-w_i.
\]
\begin{proposition}\label{CohomologyClass}
If $\mathscr{C}$ is a $p$-dimensional tropical variety compatible with $\Sigma$, then
\[
\Big\{[D_1] \wedge \ldots \wedge [D_l] \wedge \overline{\mathscr{T}}_\mathscr{C}\Big\}=\{w_1\} \wedge \ldots \wedge \{w_l\} \wedge \big\{\overline{\mathscr{T}}_\mathscr{C}\big\}.
\]
\end{proposition}
\begin{proof}
The statement follows from repeated application of the following general fact. Let $\mathscr{T}$ be a positive closed current on $X$, and let $\mathscr{D}$ be a positive closed $(1,1)$-current on $X$. We write
\[
\mathscr{D}=w+dd^cu,
\]
where $w$ is a smooth $(1,1)$-form and $u$ is an \emph{almost plurisubharmonic function}, a function
that is locally equal to the sum of a smooth function and a plurisubharmonic function.
The general fact to be applied is:
\[
\text{If $u$ is locally integrable with respect to $\text{tr}(\mathscr{T})$, then $\{\mathscr{D} \wedge \mathscr{T}\}=\{w\} \wedge \{\mathscr{T}\}$.}
\]
To see this, we use Demailly's regularization theorem \cite{DemaillyRegularization} to construct a sequence of smooth functions $u_j$ decreasing to $u$ and a smooth positive closed $(1,1)$-form $\psi$ such that
\[
\psi + dd^c u_j \ge 0.
\]
Choose open subsets $U_i \subseteq X$ covering $X$ and plurisubharmonic functions $\varphi_i$ on $U_i$ such that
\[
\psi|_{U_i}=dd^c \varphi_i.
\]
Then $\varphi_i+(u_j|_{U_i})$ is a sequence of plurisubharmonic functions on $U_i$ decreasing to $\varphi_i+(u|_{U_i})$.
By the monotone convergence theorem for wedge products \cite{Dinh-Sibony}, we have
\[
\lim_{j \to \infty} (\psi+dd^c u_j)|_{U_i} \wedge \mathscr{T}|_{U_i}=(\psi+dd^c u)|_{U_i} \wedge \mathscr{T}|_{U_i}.
\]
Since $X$ is compact, the open covering of $X$ can be taken to be finite, and hence
\[
\lim_{j \to \infty} (\psi+dd^c u_j) \wedge \mathscr{T}=(\psi+dd^c u) \wedge \mathscr{T}.
\]
By continuity of the cohomology class assignment, this implies
\[
\lim_{j \to \infty} \Big\{(w+dd^c u_j) \wedge \mathscr{T}\Big\}=\Big\{(w+dd^c u) \wedge \mathscr{T} \Big\}=\{ \mathscr{D} \wedge \mathscr{T}\}.
\]
Since $w+dd^c u_j$ is smooth and $dd^c u_j$ is exact, the left-hand side is equal to
\[
\lim_{j \to \infty} \big\{w+dd^c u_j\big\} \wedge \{\mathscr{T}\}=\{w\} \wedge \{\mathscr{T}\}.
\]
\end{proof}
\begin{proof}[Proof of Theorem \ref{Main3}]
Suppose $\rho_1,\ldots,\rho_p$ generates a $p$-dimensional cone $\gamma$ in $\Sigma$. Since $X$ is smooth, every $p$-dimensional cone of $\Sigma$ is of this form.
The torus orbit closure $V(\gamma) \subseteq X$ corresponding to $\gamma$ is the transversal intersection of $D_1,\ldots,D_p$,
and its fundamental class is Poincar\'e dual to $\{w_1\} \wedge \ldots \wedge \{w_p\}$.
We show that
\[
\langle \overline{\mathscr{T}}_\mathscr{C},w_1 \wedge \ldots \wedge w_p\rangle= \int_X w_1 \wedge \ldots \wedge w_p \wedge \overline{\mathscr{T}}_\mathscr{C}=\text{w}_{\text{rec}(\mathscr{C})}(\gamma).
\]
By Proposition \ref{CohomologyClass}, we have
\[
\int_X w_1 \wedge \ldots \wedge w_p \wedge \overline{\mathscr{T}}_\mathscr{C}=\int_X [D_1] \wedge \ldots [D_p] \wedge \overline{\mathscr{T}}_\mathscr{C}.
\]
By Proposition \ref{Wedge}, the right-hand side is
\[
\int_X [D_1] \wedge \ldots [D_p] \wedge \overline{\mathscr{T}}_\mathscr{C}=\int_X \Bigg(\sum_\sigma \text{w}_\mathscr{C}(\sigma)\iota_{\sigma *}(d\mu_\sigma)\Bigg)=\sum_\sigma \text{w}_\mathscr{C}(\sigma),
\]
where the sum is over all $p$-dimensional cells $\sigma$ in $\mathscr{C}$ such that $\text{rec}(\sigma)=\gamma$. Note that the sum is, by definition of the recession of $\mathscr{C}$, the weight $\text{w}_{\text{rec}(\mathscr{C})}(\gamma)$. Since the above computation is valid for each $p$-dimensional cone $\gamma$ in $\Sigma$,
we have
\[
\{\overline{\mathscr{T}}_\mathscr{C}\}=\text{rec}(\mathscr{C}) \in H^{q,q}(X).
\]
\end{proof}
\section{The strongly positive Hodge conjecture}\label{SectionLast}
\subsection{}
This section is devoted to the construction of the following example.
\begin{theorem}\label{Main4}
There is a $4$-dimensional smooth projective variety $X$ and a $(2,2)$-dimensional strongly positive closed current $\mathscr{T}$ on $X$ with the following properties:
\begin{enumerate}[(1)]
\item The cohomology class of $\mathscr{T}$ satisfies
\[
\{\mathscr{T}\} \in H^4(X,\mathbb{Z}) \cap H^{2,2}(X,\mathbb{C}).
\]
\item The current $\mathscr{T}$ is not a weak limit of the form
\[
\lim_{i \to \infty} \mathscr{T}_i, \quad \mathscr{T}_i=\sum_j \lambda_{ij} [Z_{ij}],
\]
where $\lambda_{ij}$ are positive real numbers and $Z_{ij}$ are irreducible surfaces in $X$.
\end{enumerate}
\end{theorem}
The above $X$ and $\mathscr{T}$ have other notable properties: $X$ is a toric variety, $\mathscr{T}$ is strongly extremal, and $\{\mathscr{T}\}$ generates an extremal ray of the nef cone of $X$.
Since any nef class in a smooth complete toric variety is effective \cite[Theorem 1.1]{Li}, there are nonnegative integers $\lambda_j$ and irreducible surfaces $Z_j\subseteq X$ such that
\[
\big\{\mathscr{T}\big\}=\sum_j \lambda_j \big\{[Z_j]\big\}.
\]
This example shows that, in general, $\textrm{HC}^+$ is not true and not implied by $\textrm{HC}'$.
\subsection{}
Let $G$ be an edge-weighted geometric graph in $\mathbb{R}^n \setminus \{0\}$,
that is, an edge-weighted graph whose vertices are nonzero vectors in $\mathbb{R}^n$ and edges are line segments in $\mathbb{R}^n \setminus \{0\}$. We suppose that all the edge-weights are real numbers.
We write
\begin{eqnarray*}
u_1,u_2,\ldots &:=& \text{the vertices of $G$},\\
u_iu_j &:=& \text{the edge connecting $u_i$ and $u_j$},\\
w_{ij} &:=& \text{the weight on the edge $u_iu_j$}.
\end{eqnarray*}
We say that an edge $u_iu_j$ is \emph{positive} or \emph{negative} according to the sign of the weight $w_{ij}$.
\begin{definition}
An edge-weighted geometric graph $G \subseteq \mathbb{R}^n \setminus \{0\}$ satisfies the \emph{balancing condition} at its vertex $u_i$ if there is a real number $d_i$ such that
\[
d_iu_i=\sum_{u_i \sim u_j} w_{ij} u_j,
\]
where the sum is over all neighbors of $u_i$ in $G$. The graph $G$ is \emph{balanced} if it satisfies the balancing condition at each of its vertices.
\end{definition}
The real numbers $d_i$ are uniquely determined by $G$ because all the vertices of $G$ are nonzero.
When $G$ is balanced, we define the \emph{tropical Laplacian} of $G$ to be the real symmetric matrix
$L_G$ with entries
\[
(L_G)_{ij}:=\left\{\begin{array}{cl} d_i & \text{if $u_i=u_j$,} \\ -w_{ij} & \text{if $u_i \sim u_j$,} \\ 0 & \text{if otherwise,}\end{array}\right.
\]
where the diagonal entries $d_i$ are the real numbers satisfying
\[
d_i u_i = \sum_{u_i \sim u_j} w_{ij} u_j.
\]
The tropical Laplacian of $G$ has a combinatorial part and a geometric part:
\[
L_G=L(G)-D(G).
\]
The combinatorial part $L(G)$ is the combinatorial Laplacian of the abstract graph of $G$ as defined in \cite{Chung}, and the geometric part $D(G)$ is a diagonal matrix that depends on the position of the vertices of $G$.
\begin{definition}
When $G$ is balanced, we define the \emph{signature} of $G$ to be the triple
\begin{eqnarray*}
n_+(G) &:=& \text{the positive index of inertia of $L_G$},\\
n_-(G) &:=& \text{the negative index of inertia of $L_G$},\\
n_0(G)\ &:=& \text{the corank of $L_G$}.
\end{eqnarray*}
\end{definition}
Let $F$ be a $2$-dimensional real weighted fan in $\mathbb{R}^n$,
that is, a $2$-dimensional weighted complex all of whose $2$-dimensional cells are cones with real weights.
We define an edge-weighted geometric graph $G(F) \subseteq \mathbb{R}^n \setminus \{0\}$ as follows:
\begin{enumerate}[(1)]
\item The set of vertices of $G(F)$ is
\[
\big\{u_i \mid \text{$u_i$ is a primitive generator of a $1$-dimensional cone in $F$}\big\}.
\]
\item The set of edges of $G(F)$ is
\[
\big\{u_iu_j \mid \text{the cone over $u_iu_j$ is a $2$-dimensional cone in $F$ with nonzero weight}\big\}.
\]
\item The weights on the edges of $G(F)$ are
\[
w_{ij}:=\text{w}_F\big(\text{cone}(u_iu_j)\big)
\]
\end{enumerate}
We say that a weighted fan is \emph{unimodular} if all of its cones are unimodular.
\begin{proposition}
When $F$ is unimodular, $F$ is balanced if and only if $G(F)$ is balanced.
\end{proposition}
\begin{proof}
Let $u_iu_j$ be an edge of $G(F)$, let $\sigma$ be the cone over $u_iu_j$, and let $\tau$ be the cone over $u_i$.
Since $\sigma$ is unimodular, the image of $u_j$
in the normal lattice of $\tau$ is $u_{\sigma/\tau}$,
the primitive generator of the ray
\[
\text{cone}(\sigma-\tau)/H_\tau \subseteq H_\sigma/H_\tau.
\]
Therefore, the balancing condition for $F$ at $\tau$ is equivalent to the condition
\[
\sum_{u_i \sim u_j} w_{ij} u_j \in \mathbb{R} \cdot u_i.
\]
\end{proof}
A geometric graph $G \subseteq \mathbb{R}^n$ is said to be \emph{locally extremal} if the set of neighbors of $u_i$ is linearly independent for every vertex $u_i \in G$.
\begin{proposition}\label{GraphExtremality}
Let $F$ be a $2$-dimensional real balanced weighted fan in $\mathbb{R}^n$. If $G(F)$ is connected and locally extremal, then $F$ is strongly extremal.
\end{proposition}
\begin{proof}
Let $u_iu_j$ be an edge of $G(F)$, let $\sigma$ be the cone over $u_iu_j$, and let $\tau$ be the cone over $u_i$.
The image of $u_j$ in the normal lattice of $\tau$ is a nonzero multiple of $u_{\sigma/\tau}$, and hence the weighted fan $F$ is locally extremal if and only if $G(F)$ is locally extremal.
Since $F$ is pure dimensional, $F$ is connected in codimension $1$ if and only if $G(F)$ is connected, and therefore the assertion follows from Proposition \ref{LocalGlobalExtremality}.
\end{proof}
When $F$ is balanced and unimodular, we define the \emph{tropical Laplacian} of $F$ to be the tropical Laplacian of $G(F)$, and the \emph{signature} of $F$ to be the signature of $G(F)$:
\[
\Big(n_+(F),n_-(F),n_0(F)\Big) := \Big(n_+\big(G(F)\big),n_-\big(G(F)\big),n_0\big(G(F)\big)\Big).
\]
In Sections \ref{PlusConstruction} and \ref{MinusConstruction}, we introduce two basic operations on $F$ and analyze the change of the signature of $F$ under each operation
(see Figure \ref{fig:basic-op}).
\begin{figure}[btm]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=8cm]{basicop2.pdf}
\end{center}
\caption{The operation $F \longmapsto F_{ij}^+$ produces one new eigenvalue whose sign coincides with the sign of $w_{ij}$, and the operation $F \longmapsto F_{ij}^-$ produces one new positive and one new negative eigenvalue.}
\label{fig:basic-op}
\end{figure}
\subsection{}\label{PlusConstruction}
Let $F$ be a $2$-dimensional real weighted fan in $\mathbb{R}^n$, and suppose that $u_1u_2$ is an edge of $G(F)$. We set
\[
n_{12}:=u_1+u_2,
\]
and define a $2$-dimensional real weighted fan $F^+_{12}$ as follows:
\begin{enumerate}[(1)]
\item The set of $1$-dimensional cones in $F_{12}^+$ is
\[
\Big\{\text{cone}(n_{12})\Big\} \cup \Big\{\text{$1$-dimensional cones in $F$}\Big\}.
\]
\item The set of $2$-dimensional cones in $F^+_{12}$ is
\[
\Big\{\text{cone}(u_1n_{12}), \text{cone}(u_2n_{12})\Big\} \cup \Big\{ \text{$2$-dimensional cones in $F$ other than $\text{cone}(u_1u_2)$}\Big\}.
\]
\item The weights on the $2$-dimensional cones in $F^+_{12}$ are
\begin{eqnarray*}
&&\text{w}_{F^+_{12}}\big(\text{cone}(u_1n_{12})\big):=w_{12},\\
&&\text{w}_{F^+_{12}}\big(\text{cone}(u_2n_{12})\big):=w_{12},\\
&&\text{w}_{F^+_{12}}\big(\text{cone}(u_iu_j)\big):=w_{ij}.
\end{eqnarray*}
\end{enumerate}
The abstract graph of $G(F^+_{12})$ is a subdivision of the abstract graph of $G(F)$, with one new vertex $n_{12}$ subdividing the edge connecting $u_1$ and $u_2$.
It is easy to see that
\begin{enumerate}[--]
\item $F_{12}^+$ is balanced if and only if $F$ is balanced,
\vspace{1mm}
\item $F^+_{12}$ is unimodular if and only if $F$ is unimodular,
\vspace{1mm}
\item $F_{12}^+$ is non-degenerate if and only if $F$ is non-degenerate,
\vspace{1mm}
\item $F^+_{12}$ is strongly extremal if and only if $F$ is strongly extremal.
\end{enumerate}
Suppose $F$ is balanced and unimodular, so that the tropical Laplacians $L_{G(F)}$ and $L_{G(F_{12}^+)}$ are defined. The balancing condition for $G(F)$ translates to the balancing condition for $G(F^+_{12})$, and we can compute the diagonal entries of $L_{G(F_{12}^+)}$ from the diagonal entries of $L_{G(F)}$.
The balancing condition for $G(F)$ at $u_i$ is
\[
d_iu_i=\sum_{u_i \sim u_j} w_{ij}u_j,
\]
where the sum is over all neighbors of $u_i$ in the graph $G(F)$.
\begin{enumerate}[(1)]
\item The balancing condition for $G(F_{12}^+)$ at $u_1$ is
\[
(d_1+w_{12})u_1=w_{12}n_{12}+\sum_{u_j} w_{1j}u_j,
\]
where the sum is over all neighbors of $u_1$ other than $u_2$ in the graph $G(F)$.
\item The balancing condition for $G(F_{12}^+)$ at $u_2$ is
\[
(d_2+w_{12})u_2=w_{12}n_{12}+\sum_{u_j} w_{2j}u_j,
\]
where the sum is over all neighbors of $u_2$ other than $u_1$ in the graph $G(F)$.
\item The balancing condition for $G(F_{12}^+)$ at $n_{12}$ is
\[
w_{12}n_{12}=w_{12}u_1+w_{12}u_2.
\]
\end{enumerate}
Around any other vertex, the geometric graphs $G(F)$ and $G(F^+_{12})$ are identical, and hence the diagonal entries of the two tropical Laplacians agree.
\begin{proposition}\label{PositiveSignature}
We have
\[
\Big(n_+(F^+_{12}), \ n_-(F^+_{12}), \ n_0(F^+_{12})\Big)=\left\{\begin{array}{cc}\Big(n_+(F)+1,\ n_-(F),\ n_0(F)\Big) &\text{if $w_{12}$ is positive,} \vspace{2mm}\\ \Big(n_+(F),\ n_-(F)+1,\ n_0(F)\Big) &\text{if $w_{12}$ is negative.} \end{array}\right.
\]
\end{proposition}
\begin{proof}
Let $Q_{G(F)}$ and $Q_{G(F^+_{12})}$ be the quadratic forms associated to $L_{G(F)}$ and $L_{G(F^+_{12})}$ respectively.
The above analysis of the balancing condition for $G(F^+_{12})$ shows that
\begin{multline*}
Q_{G(F^+_{12})}(y_{12},x_1,x_2,x_3,\ldots)-Q_{G(F)}(x_1,x_2,x_3,\ldots) =\\
w_{12} x_1^2 +w_{12} x_2^2+2w_{12} x_1x_2+w_{12} y_{12}^2-2w_{12} x_1y_{12}-2y_{12} x_{2}y_{12},
\end{multline*}
where $y_{12}$ is the variable corresponding to the new vertex $n_{12}$ and $x_i$ is the variable corresponding to $u_i$. The above equation simplifies to
\[
Q_{G(F^+_{12})}(y_{12},x_1,x_2,x_3,\ldots)-Q_{G(F)}(x_1,x_2,x_3,\ldots)=w_{12} \big(y_{12}-x_1-x_2\big)^2,
\]
and the conclusion follows.
\end{proof}
\subsection{}\label{MinusConstruction}
An edge $u_1u_2$ of a geometric graph in $\mathbb{R}^n \setminus \{0\}$ is said to be in \emph{general position} if for every other edge $u_iu_j$ of the graph
\[
\text{span}(u_1,u_2) \cap \text{span}(u_i,u_j)=\left\{\begin{array}{cl} 0 &\text{if $\{u_1,u_2\} \cap \{u_i,u_j\}=\emptyset$,} \\ \text{span}(u_1)& \text{if $\{u_1,u_2\} \cap \{u_i,u_j\}=\{u_1\}$,} \\ \text{span}(u_2) &\text{if $\{u_1,u_2\} \cap \{u_i,u_j\}=\{u_2\}$.}\end{array}\right.
\]
Let $F$ be a $2$-dimensional real weighted fan in $\mathbb{R}^n$, and suppose that $u_1u_2$ is an edge of $G(F)$. If $u_1u_2$ is in general position, we set
\[
n_1:=-u_1, \quad n_2:=-u_2,
\]
and define a $2$-dimensional real weighted fan $F^-_{12}$ as follows:
\begin{enumerate}[(1)]
\item The set of $1$-dimensional cones in $F^-_{12}$ is
\[
\Big\{\text{cone}(n_1), \text{cone}(n_2)\Big\} \cup \Big\{\text{$1$-dimensional cones in $F$}\Big\}.
\]
\item The set of $2$-dimensional cones in $F^-_{12}$ is
\[
\Big\{\text{cone}(n_1n_2),\text{cone}(n_1u_2),\text{cone}(u_1n_2)\Big\} \cup \Big\{\text{$2$-dimensional cones in $F$ other than $\text{cone}(u_1u_2)$}\Big\}.
\]
\item The weights on the $2$-dimensional cones in $F^-_{12}$ are
\begin{eqnarray*}
&&\text{w}_{F^-_{12}}\big(\text{cone}(n_1n_2)\big):=-w_{12},\\
&&\text{w}_{F^-_{12}}\big(\text{cone}(n_1u_2)\big):=-w_{12},\\
&&\text{w}_{F^-_{12}}\big(\text{cone}(u_1n_2)\big):=-w_{12},\\
&&\text{w}_{F^-_{12}}\big(\text{cone}(u_iu_j)\big):=w_{ij}.
\end{eqnarray*}
\end{enumerate}
The cones in $F_{12}^-$ form a fan because $u_1u_2$ is in general position. The abstract graph of $G(F^-_{12})$ is a subdivision of the abstract graph of $G(F)$, with two new vertices $n_1$ and $n_2$ subdividing the edge connecting $u_1$ and $u_2$.
It is easy to see that
\begin{enumerate}[--]
\item $F^-_{12}$ is balanced if and only if $F$ is balanced,
\vspace{1mm}
\item $F^-_{12}$ is unimodular if and only if $F$ is unimodular,
\vspace{1mm}
\item $F_{12}^-$ is non-degenerate if and only if $F$ is non-degenerate,
\vspace{1mm}
\item $F^-_{12}$ is strongly extremal if and only if $F$ is strongly extremal.
\end{enumerate}
Suppose $F$ is balanced and unimodular, so that the tropical Laplacians $L_{G(F)}$ and $L_{G(F_{12}^-)}$ are defined. The balancing condition for $G(F)$ translates to the balancing condition for $G(F^-_{12})$, and we can compute the diagonal entries of $L_{G(F^-_{12})}$ from the diagonal entries of $L_{G(F)}$.
The balancing condition for $G(F)$ at $u_i$ is
\[
d_iu_i=\sum_{u_i \sim u_j} w_{ij}u_j,
\]
where the sum is over all neighbors of $u_i$ in the graph $G(F)$.
\begin{enumerate}[(1)]
\item The balancing condition for $G(F_{12}^-)$ at $u_1$ is
\[
d_1u_1=(-w_{12})n_2 + \sum_j w_{1j}u_j,
\]
where the sum is over all neighbors of $u_1$ other than $u_2$ in the graph $G(F)$.
\item The balancing condition for $G(F_{12}^-)$ at $u_2$ is
\[
d_2u_2=(-w_{12})n_1 + \sum_j w_{2j}u_j,
\]
where the sum is over all neighbors of $u_2$ other than $u_1$ in the graph $G(F)$.
\item The balancing condition for $G(F_{12}^-)$ at $n_1$ is
\[
0 \cdot n_{1}=(-w_{12})u_2+(-w_{12})n_2.
\]
\item The balancing condition for $G(F_{12}^-)$ at $n_2$ is
\[
0 \cdot n_{2}=(-w_{12})u_1+(-w_{12})n_1.
\]
\end{enumerate}
Around any other vertex, the geometric graphs $G(F)$ and $G(F^-_{12})$ are identical, and hence the diagonal entries of the two tropical Laplacians agree.
\begin{proposition}\label{MinusSignature}
We have
\[
\Big(n_+(F^-_{12}),\ n_-(F^-_{12}),\ n_0(F^-_{12})\Big)=\Big(n_+(F)+1,\ n_-(F)+1,\ n_0(F) \Big).
\]
\end{proposition}
\begin{proof}
Let $Q_{G(F)}$ and $Q_{G(F^-_{12})}$ be the quadratic forms associated to $L_{G(F)}$ and $L_{G(F^-_{12})}$ respectively.
The above analysis of the balancing condition for $G(F^-_{12})$ shows that
\begin{multline*}
Q_{G(F^-_{12})}(y_{1},y_2,x_1,x_2,x_3,\ldots)-Q_{G(F)}(x_1,x_2,x_3,\ldots)=\\
w_{12} x_1x_2+w_{12} x_1y_2+w_{12} x_2y_1+w_{12} y_1y_2,
\end{multline*}
where $y_1,y_2$ are variables corresponding to $n_1,n_2$ respectively and $x_i$ is the variable corresponding to $u_i$. The above equation simplifies to
\[
Q_{G(F^-_{12})}(y_{1},y_2,x_1,x_2,x_3,\ldots)-Q_{G(F)}(x_1,x_2,x_3,\ldots)=w_{12}(y_1+x_1)(y_2+x_2),
\]
and the conclusion follows.
\end{proof}
\subsection{}
Let $X$ be an $n$-dimensional smooth projective toric variety, $\Sigma$ be the fan of $X$, and let $p$ be an integer $\ge 2$.
\begin{proposition}\label{OneNegativeEigenvalue}
Let $\{\mathscr{T}\}$ be a $(p,p)$-dimensional cohomology class in $X$.
If there are nonnegative real numbers $\lambda_i$ and $p$-dimensional irreducible subvarieties $Z_i \subseteq X$ such that
\[
\{\mathscr{T}\}=\lim_{i \to \infty} \big\{\lambda_i [Z_i] \big\}
\]
then, for any nef divisors $H_1,H_2,\ldots$ on $X$, the tropical Laplacian of the $2$-dimensional balanced weighted fan
\[
\{H_1\} \cup \ldots \cup \{H_{p-2}\} \cup \{\mathscr{T}\}
\]
has at most one negative eigenvalue.
\end{proposition}
In particular, by continuity of the cohomology class assignment, if a $(2,2)$-dimensional closed current $\mathscr{T}$ on $X$ is the weak limit of the form
\[
\mathscr{T}=\lim_{i \to \infty} \lambda_i [Z_i],
\]
where $\lambda_i$ are nonnegative real numbers and $Z_i$ are irreducible surfaces in $X$, then the tropical Laplacian of $\{\mathscr{T}\}$ has at most one negative eigenvalue.
\begin{proof}
Repeatedly applying the Bertini theorem \cite[Corollary 6.11]{Jouanolou} to a general element of the linear system $|H_i|$, we are reduced to the case when $p=2$:
If there are nonnegative real numbers $\lambda_i$ and irreducible surfaces $Z_i \subseteq X$ such that
\[
\{\mathscr{T}\}=\lim_{i \to \infty} \big\{\lambda_i [Z_i] \big\}
\]
then the tropical Laplacian of $\{\mathscr{T}\}$ has at most one negative eigenvalue.
By continuity, it is enough to prove the following statement: If $Z \subseteq X$ is an irreducible surface, then the tropical Laplacian of $\big\{[Z]\big\}$ has exactly one negative eigenvalue.
Let $F$ be the cohomology class $\big\{[Z]\big\}$, viewed as a $2$-dimensional weighted fan in $\mathbb{R}^n$, and let
\begin{eqnarray*}
u_1,u_2,\ldots &:=& \text{primitive generators of $1$-dimensional cones in $\Sigma$,}\\
D_1,D_2,\ldots &:=& \text{torus-invariant prime divisors of $\text{cone}(u_1),\text{cone}(u_2),\ldots$,}\\
L_1,L_2,\ldots &:=& \text{line bundles on $X$ corresponding to $D_1,D_2,\ldots$.}
\end{eqnarray*}
The $2$-dimensional cones in $F$ are the $2$-dimensional cones in $\Sigma$, and the weights are given by
\[
w_{ij}:=\text{w}_F\big(\text{cone}(u_iu_j)\big)=c_1(L_i) \cup c_1(L_j) \cap \text{cl}(Z)=D_i \cdot D_j \cdot \text{cl}(Z).
\]
Let $d_i$ be a diagonal entry of the tropical Laplacian of $F$, determined by the balancing condition
\[
d_iu_i=\sum_{u_i \sim u_j} w_{ij}u_j,
\]
where the sum is over all neighbors of $u_i$ in the graph of $F$. We claim that
\[
d_i=-D_i \cdot D_i \cdot \text{cl}(Z).
\]
To see this, choose any $m \in (\mathbb{Z}^n)^\vee$ satisfying $\langle u_i,m\rangle=1$. By the balancing condition above, we have
\[
d_i=\sum_{u_i \sim u_j} w_{ij}\langle u_j,m \rangle.
\]
The divisor of the character $\chi^m$ in $X$ is
\[
\text{div}(\chi^m)=\sum_{j} \langle u_j,m\rangle D_j,
\]
where the sum is over all torus-invariant prime divisors in $X$ \cite[Proposition 4.1.2]{Cox-Little-Schenck}. Therefore, we have the rational equivalence
\[
-D_i \sim \sum_{j\neq i} \langle u_j,m\rangle D_j,
\]
where the sum is over all torus-invariant prime divisors in $X$ not equal to $D_i$.
Since $D_i$ and $D_j$ are disjoint when $u_iu_j$ does not generate a cone in $F$, this implies
\[
-D_i \cdot D_i \cdot \text{cl}(Z) = \sum_{u_i \sim u_j} \langle u_j,m\rangle \Big(D_i \cdot D_j \cdot \text{cl}(Z)\Big),
\]
where the sum is over all neighbors of $u_i$ in the graph of $F$.
It follows that
\[
d_i=\sum_{u_i \sim u_j} w_{ij}\langle u_j,m \rangle = \sum_{u_i \sim u_j} \langle u_j,m \rangle \Big(D_i \cdot D_j \cdot \text{cl}(Z)\Big)=-D_i \cdot D_i \cdot \text{cl}(Z).
\]
We now show that the tropical Laplacian of $F$ has exactly one negative eigenvalue.
Choose any resolution of singularities $\pi: \widetilde{Z} \longrightarrow Z$. By the projection formula, for any $i$ and $j$,
\[
D_i \cdot D_j \cdot \text{cl}(Z)= \pi^*\big(c_1(L_i)\big) \cup \pi^*\big(c_1(L_j)\big) \cap \text{cl}(\widetilde{Z}).
\]
Let $V$ be the real vector space with basis $e_1,e_2,\ldots$, and consider the linear map to the N\'eron-Severi space
\[
V \longrightarrow \text{NS}^1_\mathbb{R}(\widetilde{Z}), \qquad e_i \longmapsto \pi^*\big(c_1(L_i)\big).
\]
By the computation made above, the quadratic form associated to the tropical Laplacian of $F$ is obtained as the composition
\[
\xymatrix{
V \times V \ar[r] & \text{NS}^1_\mathbb{R}(\widetilde{Z}) \times \text{NS}^1_\mathbb{R}(\widetilde{Z}) \ar[r]^{\hspace{12mm} -I} & \mathbb{R},
}
\]
where $I$ is the intersection form on $\widetilde{Z}$. By the Hodge index theorem \cite[Chapter 4]{Griffiths-Harris}, $-I$ has signature of the form $(\rho-1,1,0)$, and hence the tropical Laplacian of $F$ has at most one negative eigenvalue. Since $X$ is projective, the tropical Laplacian has, in fact, exactly one negative eigenvalue.
\end{proof}
The following application of Milman's converse to the Krein-Milman theorem relates extremality to the strongly positive Hodge conjecture,
see \cite[Proof of Proposition 5.2]{DemaillyHodge}.
\begin{proposition}\label{Milman'sConverse}
Let $\mathscr{T}$ be a $(p,p)$-dimensional closed current on $X$ of the form
\[
\mathscr{T}=\lim_{i \to \infty} \mathscr{T}_i, \quad \mathscr{T}_i=\sum_j \lambda_{ij} [Z_{ij}],
\]
where $\lambda_{ij}$ are nonnegative real numbers and $Z_{ij}$ are $p$-dimensional irreducible subvarieties of $X$.
If $\mathscr{T}$ generates an extremal ray of the cone of strongly positive closed currents on $X$, then
there are nonnegative real numbers $\lambda_i$ and $p$-dimensional irreducible subvarieties $Z_i \subseteq X$ such that
\[
\mathscr{T}=\lim_{i \to \infty} \lambda_i [Z_i].
\]
\end{proposition}
\begin{proof}
For a $(p,p)$-dimensional positive current $T$ on $X$, we set
\[
||T||:=\int_X T \wedge w^p,
\]
where $w$ is the fixed K\"ahler form on $X$.
Consider the sets of positive currents
\begin{eqnarray*}
\mathscr{S}&:=&\Bigg\{ T: \text{$T$ is a $(p,p)$-dimensional positive closed current with $||T||=1$}\Bigg\},\\
\mathscr{K}&:=&\Bigg\{\frac{[Z]}{||[Z]||} : \text{$Z$ is a $p$-dimensional irreducible subvariety of $X$}\Bigg\} \subseteq \mathscr{S}.
\end{eqnarray*}
Banach-Alaoglu theorem \cite[Theorem 3.15]{Rudin} shows that $\mathscr{S}$ is compact, and hence
the closure $\overline{\mathscr{K}} \subseteq \mathscr{S}$ and the closed convex hull $\overline{\text{co}}(\mathscr{K}) \subseteq \mathscr{S}$ are compact.
Since the space of $(p,p)$-dimensional currents on $X$ is locally convex, Milman's theorem \cite[Theorem 3.25]{Rudin} applies to these compact sets:
Every extremal element of $\overline{\text{co}}(\mathscr{K})$ is contained in $\overline{\mathscr{K}}$.
To conclude, we note that
\[
\frac{\mathscr{T}}{||\mathscr{T}||} \in \overline{\text{co}}(\mathscr{K}).
\]
Indeed, the current $\mathscr{T}_i$ is nonzero for sufficiently large $i$, and
\[
\frac{\mathscr{T}}{||\mathscr{T}||}=\lim_{i \to \infty} \frac{\mathscr{T}_i}{||\mathscr{T}_i||}, \qquad\frac{ \mathscr{T}_i}{|| \mathscr{T}_i||} \in \text{co}(\mathscr{K}).
\]
Furthermore, since the cone of strongly positive closed currents contains $\overline{\text{co}}(\mathscr{K})$, the current $\mathscr{T}/||\mathscr{T}||$ is an extremal element of $\overline{\text{co}}(\mathscr{K})$. It follows from Milman's theorem that
\[
\frac{\mathscr{T}}{||\mathscr{T}||} \in \overline{\mathscr{K}}.
\]
In other words, there are $p$-dimensional irreducible subvarieties $Z_i \subseteq X$ such that
\[
\frac{\mathscr{T}}{||\mathscr{T}||}=\lim_{i \to \infty} \frac{[Z_i]}{||[Z_i]||}.
\]
\end{proof}
\subsection{}
Suppose $F$ is a $2$-dimensional real weighted fan in $\mathbb{R}^n$ with the following properties:
\begin{enumerate}[--]
\item $F$ is balanced, unimodular, and non-degenerate,
\vspace{1mm}
\item $G(F)$ is connected and locally extremal,
\vspace{1mm}
\item the negative edges of $G(F)$ are pairwise disjoint and in general position.
\end{enumerate}
Let $u_1u_2,u_3u_4,\ldots$ be the negative edges of $G(F)$, and let $m$ be the number of negative edges. Since the negative edges are pairwise disjoint and in general position, we may define
\[
\widetilde{F}:=(((F^-_{12})_{34}^-)^-_{56}\ldots)^-_{2m-12m}.
\]
The resulting weighted fan $\widetilde{F}$ has the following properties:
\begin{enumerate}[--]
\item $\widetilde{F}$ is positive,
\vspace{1mm}
\item $\widetilde{F}$ is balanced, unimodular, and non-degenerate,
\vspace{1mm}
\item $G(\widetilde{F})$ is connected and locally extremal.
\end{enumerate}
In addition, by Proposition \ref{MinusSignature},
\[
n_-(\widetilde{F}) \ge (\text{the number of negative edges of $G(F)$}).
\]
We construct an example of $F$ in $\mathbb{R}^4$ with the stated properties.
We start from a geometric realization $G \subseteq \mathbb{R}^4 \setminus \{0\}$ of the complete bipartite graph
\[
{\xymatrixcolsep{2pc}\xymatrixrowsep{3pc}
\xymatrix{
e_1 \ar@{-}[d] \ar@{-}[dr] \ar@{-}[drr] \ar@{-}[drrr]& e_2 \ar@{-}[d] \ar@{-}[dl] \ar@{-}[dr] \ar@{-}[drr]& e_3 \ar@{-}[d] \ar@{-}[dll] \ar@{-}[dl] \ar@{-}[dr]& e_4 \ar@{-}[d] \ar@{-}[dlll] \ar@{-}[dll] \ar@{-}[dl]\\
f_1&f_2&f_3&f_4,
}
}
\]
where $e_1,e_2,e_3,e_4$ are the standard basis vectors of $\mathbb{R}^4$ and $f_1,f_2,f_3,f_4$ are suitable primitive integral vectors to be determined.
Let $M$ be the matrix with row vectors $f_1,f_2,f_3,f_4$, and let $\mathscr{P}$ be the collection of cones
\[
\Big\{0\Big\} \cup \Big\{\text{cone}(u_i) \mid \text{$u_i$ is a vertex of $G$}\Big\} \cup \Big\{\text{cone}(u_iu_j) \mid \text{$u_iu_j$ is an edge of $G$}\Big\}.
\]
If the determinant of $M$ is nonzero, then $\{f_1,f_2,f_3,f_4\}$ is linearly independent, and hence $G$ is locally extremal.
\begin{lemma}\label{GenericMinors}
If all $2 \times 2$ minors of $M$ are nonzero, then every edge of $G$ is in general position, and $\mathscr{P}$ is a fan.
\end{lemma}
\begin{proof}
We show that every edge of $G$ is in general position. It is easy to check from this that $\mathscr{P}$ is a fan. By symmetry, it is enough to show that
\begin{eqnarray*}
\text{span}(e_1,f_1) \cap \text{span}(e_2,f_2)&=&0, \\
\text{span}(e_1,f_1) \cap \text{span}(e_1,f_2)&=&\text{span}(e_1),\\
\text{span}(e_1,f_1) \cap \text{span}(e_2,f_1)&=&\text{span}(f_1).
\end{eqnarray*}
This follows from direct computation. For example, the intersection $\text{span}(e_1,f_1) \cap \text{span}(e_2,f_2)$ is isomorphic to the kernel of the transpose of the submatrix $M_{\{1,2\},\{3,4\}}$, which is nonsingular by assumption. Therefore we have the first equality. The other two equalities can be shown in a similar way.
\end{proof}
If the determinant of $M$ is nonzero, then $G$ is locally extremal, and hence any two balanced edge-weights on $G$ are proportional.
For a randomly chosen $M$, the graph $G$ does not admit any nonzero balanced weight.
\begin{lemma}\label{BalancingK44}
If the columns of $M$ form an orthogonal basis of $\mathbb{R}^4$, then $G$ admits a nonzero balanced integral weight, unique up to a constant multiple.
\end{lemma}
\begin{proof}
The uniqueness follows from the connectedness and the local extremality of $G$. We define edge-weights on $G$ by setting
\[
\left(\begin{array}{cccc}
\text{w}(e_1f_1) &\text{w}(e_2f_1) & \text{w}(e_3f_1) & \text{w}(e_4f_1)\\
\text{w}(e_1f_2) &\text{w}(e_2f_2) & \text{w}(e_3f_2) & \text{w}(e_4f_2)\\
\text{w}(e_1f_3) &\text{w}(e_2f_3) & \text{w}(e_3f_3) & \text{w}(e_4f_3)\\
\text{w}(e_1f_4) &\text{w}(e_2f_4) & \text{w}(e_3f_4) & \text{w}(e_4f_4)\\
\end{array}\right):=M,
\]
where $\text{w}(e_if_j)$ denote the weight on the edge $e_if_j$.
It is straightforward to check that $G$ is balanced. For example, the balancing condition for $G$ at $f_1$ is
\[
f_1= f_{11} e_1+f_{12} e_2+f_{13} e_3+f_{14}e_4,
\]
and the balancing condition for $G$ at $e_1$ is
\[
(f_{11}^2+f_{21}^2+f_{31}^2+f_{41}^2)e_1=f_{11}f_1+f_{21}f_2+f_{31}f_3+f_{41}f_4.
\]
\end{proof}
Suppose that $M$ is an integral matrix all of whose $2 \times 2$ minors are nonzero. If columns of $M$ form an orthogonal basis of $\mathbb{R}^4$, then we can construct a balanced weighted fan $F$ on $\mathscr{P}$ using Lemmas \ref{GenericMinors} and \ref{BalancingK44}.
If furthermore all the entries of $M$ are either $0$ or $\pm 1$, then $F$ is unimodular, and if each row and column of $M$ contains at most one negative entry, then the negative edges of $G(F)$ are pairwise disjoint.
As a concrete example, we take
\[
M
:=\left(
\begin{array}{rrrr}
0&1&1&1\\
1&0&-1&1\\
1&1&0&-1\\
1&-1&1&0\\
\end{array}
\right).
\]
The determinant of $M$ is $-9$, and the $2 \times 2$ minors of $M$ are
\begin{multline*}
-1,-1,-1,-1,-1,-1,-1,-1,
-1,-1,-1,-1,-1,-1,-1,-1,-1,-1,-1,\\
+1,+1,+1,+1,+1,
+1,+1,+1,+1,+1,+1,
-2,-2,-2,
+2,+2,+2.
\end{multline*}
It follows that $\mathscr{P}$ is a unimodular fan and all edges of $G$ are in general position.
The columns of $M$ form an orthogonal basis of $\mathbb{R}^4$, and hence $\mathscr{P}$ admits a balanced integral weight as in Lemma \ref{BalancingK44}. This defines a balanced weighted unimodular fan $F$.
The abstract graph of $G(F)$ is
\[
\xymatrixcolsep{2pc}\xymatrixrowsep{3pc}
\xymatrix{
e_1 \ar@{-}[dr] \ar@{-}[drr] \ar@{-}[drrr]& e_2\ar@{-}[dl] \ar@{-}[dr] \ar@{--}[drr]& e_3\ar@{-}[dll] \ar@{--}[dl] \ar@{-}[dr]& e_4\ar@{-}[dlll] \ar@{-}[dll] \ar@{--}[dl]\\
f_1&f_2&f_3&f_4,
}
\]
where the three edges with negative weights are denoted by dashed lines.
Since negative edges of $G(F)$ are pairwise disjoint and in general position, we can construct the positive balanced weighted fan $\widetilde{F}$ from $F$.
We order the vertices of $G(\widetilde{F})$ by
\[
+e_1,+e_2,+e_3,+e_4,+f_1,+f_2,+f_3,+f_4,-e_2,-e_3,-e_4,-f_2,-f_3,-f_4.
\]
The tropical Laplacian of $G(\widetilde{F})$ is the symmetric matrix
\[
\tiny
L_{G(\widetilde{F})}=\left(\begin{array}{rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr}
3&0&0&0&0&-1&-1&-1&0&0&0&0&0&0 \\\\
0&3&0&0&-1&0&-1&0&0&0&0&0&0&-1 \\\\
0&0&3&0&-1&0&0&-1&0&0&0&-1&0&0 \\\\
0&0&0&3&-1&-1&0&0&0&0&0&0&-1&0 \\\\
0&-1&-1&-1&1&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0&0 \\\\
-1&0&0&-1&0&1&0&0&0&-1&0&0&0&0 \\\\
-1&-1&0&0&0&0&1&0&0&0&-1&0&0&0 \\\\
-1&0&-1&0&0&0&0&1&-1&0&0&0&0&0 \\\\
0&0&0&0&0&0&0&-1&0&0&0&0&0&-1 \\\\
0&0&0&0&0&-1&0&0&0&0&0&-1&0&0 \\\\
0&0&0&0&0&0&-1&0&0&0&0&0&-1&0 \\\\
0&0&-1&0&0&0&0&0&0&-1&0&0&0&0 \\\\
0&0&0&-1&0&0&0&0&0&0&-1&0&0&0 \\\\
0&-1&0&0&0&0&0&0&-1&0&0&0&0&0
\end{array}
\right),
\]
and
\[
\Big(n_+(\widetilde{F}), \ n_-(\widetilde{F}), \ n_0(\widetilde{F})\Big) = \big(7,3,4\big).
\]
We use the weighted fan $\widetilde{F}$ to construct the strongly positive closed current $\mathscr{T}$ in Theorem \ref{Main4}.
\begin{proof}[Proof of Theorem \ref{Main4}]
There is a refinement of $\widetilde{F}$ that is compatible with a complete fan $\Sigma_1$ on $\mathbb{R}^4$; this is a general fact on extension of fans \cite[Proposition 3.15]{Gil-Sombra}.
Applying toric Chow lemma \cite[Theorem 6.1.18]{Cox-Little-Schenck} and toric resolution of singularities \cite[Theorem 11.1.9]{Cox-Little-Schenck} to $\Sigma_1$ in that order, we can construct a subdivision $\Sigma_2$ of $\Sigma_1$ that defines a smooth projective toric variety $X$. Let $\mathscr{C}$ be the refinement of $\widetilde{F}$ that is compatible with $\Sigma_2$. Since $\mathscr{C}$ is a unimodular refinement of the $2$-dimensional unimodular weighted fan $\widetilde{F}$, it is obtained from $\widetilde{F}$ by repeated application of the construction $F \longmapsto F^+_{ij}$ in Section \ref{PlusConstruction}, see \cite[Lemma 10.4.2]{Cox-Little-Schenck}. Therefore $\mathscr{C}$ is strongly extremal, and by Proposition \ref{PositiveSignature},
\[
n_-(\mathscr{C})=n_-(\widetilde{F})=3.
\]
Let $\mathscr{T}:=\overline{\mathscr{T}}_{\mathscr{C}}$ be the tropical current on $X$ associated to the non-degenerate weighted fan $\mathscr{C}$. We note that
\begin{enumerate}[(1)]
\item $\overline{\mathscr{T}}_\mathscr{C}$ is strongly positive because $\mathscr{C}$ is positive,
\item $\overline{\mathscr{T}}_\mathscr{C}$ is closed because $\mathscr{C}$ is balanced (Proposition \ref{ToricClosed}),
\item $\overline{\mathscr{T}}_\mathscr{C}$ is strongly extremal because $\mathscr{C}$ is strongly extremal (Proposition \ref{ToricExtremality}).
\end{enumerate}
We show that $\overline{\mathscr{T}}_\mathscr{C}$ is not a weak limit of the form
\[
\lim_{i \to \infty} \mathscr{T}_i, \quad \mathscr{T}_i=\sum_j \lambda_{ij} [Z_{ij}],
\]
where $\lambda_{ij}$ are nonnegative real numbers and $Z_{ij}$ are irreducible surfaces in $X$.
If otherwise, since $\overline{\mathscr{T}}_\mathscr{C}$ is strongly extremal, Proposition \ref{Milman'sConverse} implies that
there are nonnegative real numbers $\lambda_i$ and $p$-dimensional irreducible subvarieties $Z_i \subseteq X$ such that
\[
\overline{\mathscr{T}}_\mathscr{C}=\lim_{i \to \infty} \lambda_i [Z_i].
\]
Therefore, by Proposition \ref{OneNegativeEigenvalue}, the tropical Laplacian of $\{\overline{\mathscr{T}}_\mathscr{C}\}$ has at most one negative eigenvalue.
However, by Theorem \ref{Main3},
\[
\{\overline{\mathscr{T}}_\mathscr{C}\}=\mathscr{C},
\]
whose tropical Laplacian has three negative eigenvalues, a contradiction.
\end{proof}
|
\section{Introduction}
Lauricella's hypergeometric series $F_A(a,b,c;x)$ of $m$-variables
$x=(x_1,\dots,x_m)$ with parameters $a$, $b=(b_1,\dots,b_m)$ and
$c=(c_1,\dots,c_m)$ is defined as
$$
F_A(a,b,c;x)
=\sum_{n\in \N^m}
\frac{(a,\sum_{i=1}^m n_i)\prod_{i=1}^m(b_i,n_i)}
{\prod_{i=1}^m(c_i,n_i)\prod_{i=1}^m(1,n_i)}
\prod_{i=1}^m x_i^{n_i},
$$
where $\N=\{0,1,2,\dots\}$, $n=(n_1,\dots,n_m)$,
$c_1,\dots,c_m\notin -\N=\{0,-1,-2,\dots,\}$,
and $(c_i,n_i)=c_i(c_i+1)\cdots(c_i+ n_i-1)=\G(c_i+ n_i)/\G(c_i)$.
It is known that Lauricella's hypergeometric system of differential equations
annihilating $F_A(a,b,c;x)$ is integrable of rank $2^m$ with the singular
locus
$$
\big\{x \in \C^m\mid \prod_{i=1}^m x_i\prod_{v\in \F_2^m}(1-v\tr x)=0\big\},
$$
where $v=(v_1,\dots,v_m)$ and $v_i\in \Z_2=\{0,1\}\subset \N$.
In this paper, we give a Pfaffian system of Lauricella's hypergeometric
system $F_A$ of differential equations
under the non-integral conditions (\ref{eq:non-integral})
for linear combinations of parameters $a$, $b$ and $c$.
The connection form
of the Pfaffian system is expressed
in terms of logarithmic $1$-forms of defining equations of the singular locus,
see Corollary \ref{cor:Pfaffian}.
When the number of variables is two, this system is called Appell's $F_2$,
of which Pfaffian system is studied by several authors;
refer to \cite{Ka} and the references therein.
To express the connection form of this system,
we study linear transformations $\cR_{0}^i$ and $\cR_v$
representing local behaviors of the connection form
around the components $S_0^i=\{x\in \C^m\mid x_i=0\}$ and
$S_v=\{x\in \C^m\mid 1-v\tr x=0\}$ of the singular locus.
They can be regarded as linear transformations of
the twisted cohomology groups with respect to
integrals representing solutions of this system.
We show that they have two eigenvalues for generic parameters.
It is a key property for characterizing $\cR_{0}^i$ and $\cR_v$ that
eigenspaces of each of them are orthogonal to each other
with respect to the intersection form of the twisted cohomology groups.
By using the intersection form, we express $\cR_{0}^i$ and $\cR_v$
without choosing a basis of the twisted cohomology group, see
Lemma \ref{lem:refA} and Theorem \ref{th:connection}.
Their matrix representations in Corollary \ref{cor:connection matrix}
imply the Pfaffian system of Lauricella's $F_A$.
The monodromy representation of this system is studied in \cite{MY}.
Its circuit transformations are expressed in terms of the intersection form
of twisted homology groups, which are dual to the twisted cohomology groups.
Refer to \cite{M2} for the study of a Pfaffian and the monodromy
representation of Lauricella's system $F_D$ in terms of the
intersection form of twisted (co)homology groups.
\section{Lauricella's $F_A$-system of
hypergeometric differential equations}
In this section, we collect some facts about
Lauricella's hypergeometric system $F_A$ of differential equations, for which
we refer to \cite{AoKi},
\cite{L}, \cite{MY} and \cite{Y1}.
Lauricella's hypergeometric series $F_A(a,b,c;x)$ converges in the domain
$$
\D=
\Big\{x\in \C^m\Big| \sum\limits_{i=1}^m |x_i|<1\Big\}
$$
and admits the integral representation
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:Euler}
\!\!\Big[\prod_{i=1}^m\frac{ \G(c_i)}
{\G(b_i)\G(c_i\!-\!b_i)}\Big]
\int_{(0,1)^m} u(a,b,c;x,t)\frac{dT}{t_1\cdots t_m},
\end{equation}
where $dT=dt_1\wedge\cdots\wedge dt_m$,
$$u(x,t)=u(a,b,c;x,t)=
\Big[\prod_{i=1}^m t_i^{b_i}(1\!-\! t_i)^{c_i\!-\! b_i\!-\!1}\Big]
(1\!-\!\Sigma_{i=1}^{m} x_it_i)^{-a},
$$
and parameters $b$ and $c$ satisfy
$\re(c_i)>\re(b_i)>0$ $(i=1,\dots,m)$.
Differential operators
$$
x_i(1\!-\! x_i)\pa_i^2\!-\! x_i\sum_{1\le j\le m}^{j\ne i}x_j\pa_i\pa_j\!
+\! [c_i\!-\! (a\!+\! b_i\!+\! 1)x_i]\pa_i\!
-\! b_i\sum_{1\le j\le m}^{j\ne i}x_j\pa_j\!
-\! ab_i
$$
for $i=1,\dots,m$
annihilate the series $F_A(a,b,c;x)$, where
$\displaystyle{\pa_i=\frac{\pa}{\pa x_i}}$.
We define Lauricella's hypergeometric system $F_A(a,b,c)$
by differential equations corresponding to these operators.
We define the local solution space $Sol(U)$ of
the system $F_A(a,b,c)$ on a domain $U$ in $\C^m$ by
the $\C$-vector space
$$\{F(x)\in \mathcal{O}(U)\mid P(x,\pa)\cdot F(x)=0\ \textrm{for any }
P(x,\pa)\in F_A(a,b,c)\},$$
where $\mathcal{O}(U)$ is the $\C$-algebra
of single valued holomorphic functions on $U$.
The rank of $F_A(a,b,c)$ is defined by
$\sup\limits_{U}\dim(Sol(U))$.
It is known that the rank of $F_A(a,b,c)$ is $2^m$
and $2^m$ functions $F_A(a,b,c;x)$ and $\pa_I F_A(a,b,c;x)$
are linearly independent, where $I=\{i_1,\dots,i_r\}$ runs over the
non-empty subsets of $\{1,\dots,m\}$ and
$\pa_I=\pa_{i_1}\cdots\pa_{i_r}$.
If the rank of $F_A(a,b,c)$ is greater than
$\dim(Sol(U_x))$ for any neighborhood $U_x$ of $x\in \C^m$ then
$x$ is called a singular point of $F_A(a,b,c)$.
The singular locus of $F_A(a,b,c)$ is defined as the set of such points.
It is also shown in \cite{MY} that the singular locus is
$$\big(\bigcup_{v\in \Z_2^m} S_v\big)\bigcup\big(\bigcup_{i=1}^m S_0^i\big),$$
where
$$\begin{array}{ll}
S_{v}=\{x\in \C^m\mid v\tr x=\sum_{i=1}^m v_ix_i=1\},
& v\in \F_2^m,\\[1mm]
S_{0}^i=\{x\in \C^m\mid x_i=0\},
&i=1,\dots,m,
\end{array}
$$
and we regard $S_{(0,\dots,0)}$ as the empty set.
We set
\begin{eqnarray*}
X&=&\C^m-\Big[\big(\bigcup_{v\in \Z_2^m} S_w\big)
\bigcup\big(\bigcup_{i=1}^m S_0^i\big)\Big],\\
S&=&(\P^1)^m-X=\big(\bigcup_{v\in \Z_2^m} S_w\big)
\bigcup\big(\bigcup_{i=1}^m S_0^i\big)\bigcup\big
(\bigcup_{i=1}^m S_\infty^i\big),
\end{eqnarray*}
where $S_{\infty}^i=\{x\in (\P^1)^m\mid x_i=\infty\}.$
We define a partial order and a total order on $\F_2^m$.
\begin{definition}
\label{def:orders}
For $v=(v_1,\dots,v_m), w=(w_1,\dots,w_m)\in\F_2^m$,
\begin{itemize}
\item[$(i)$]
$v\succeq w$ if and only if $w_i=1 \Rightarrow v_i=1$.
\item[$(ii)$]
$v\succ w$ if and only if $v\succeq w$ and $v\ne w$.
\item[$(iii)$]
$v>w$ if and only if $v\ne w$ and they satisfy one of
\begin{itemize}
\item[(1)] $|v|>|w|$,
\item[(2)] $|v|=|w|$ and $v_i<w_i$, where $i$ is the minimum index
satisfying $v_i\ne w_i$.
\end{itemize}
\end{itemize}
\end{definition}
It is easy to see that
$$\begin{array}{c}
v\succ w \Rightarrow v>w,\\
(0,\dots,0)\prec e_{i} \prec e_{i}+e_{j} \prec e_{i}+e_{j}+e_{k}
\prec \cdots\prec(1,\dots,1),\\
(0,\dots,0)<e_1<e_2<\cdots<e_m<e_1+e_2<e_1+e_3<\cdots<(1,\dots,1),
\end{array}
$$
where $e_i$ is the $i$-th unit row vector, and $i,j,k$ are mutually different.
Note that the cardinality of the set
$\{w\in \F_2^m\mid v\succeq w\}$ for a fixed $v\in \F_2^m$ is $2^{|v|}$,
where
$$|v|=\sum_{i=1}^m v_i.$$
By the bijection
$$
\F_2^m\ni v\mapsto I_v=\{i\in \{1,\dots,m\}\mid v_i=1\}\in 2^{\{1,\dots,m\}}
$$
between $\F_2^m$ and
the power set $2^{\{1,\dots,m\}}$ of $\{1,\dots,m\}$,
the partial order $\succeq$ on $\F_2^m$ corresponds to
the partial order $\supset$ on $2^{\{1,\dots,m\}}$.
We set
$$
\begin{array}{rll}
(\b_{0,1},\dots,\b_{0,m})&=&(b_1,\dots,b_m),\\
(\b_{1,1},\dots,\b_{1,m})&=&(c_1-1-b_1,\dots,c_m-1-b_m),\\
\g_v&=&a-v \tr c+|v|\quad (v\in \F_2^m).
\end{array}
$$
We regard theses parameters as indeterminates.
Throughout this paper, we assume that
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:non-integral}
\b_{0,i},\ \b_{1,i},\ \g_v \notin \ \Z
\end{equation}
for any $i\in \{1,\dots,m\}$ and $v\in \F_2^m$,
when we assign complex values to them.
\section{Twisted cohomology group}
In this section, we regard vector spaces as defined over
the rational function field $\C(\a)=\C(a,b_1,\dots,b_m,c_1,\dots,c_m)$
when we do not specify a field.
We denote the vector space of rational $k$-forms on $\C^m$
with poles only along $S$ by $\W^k_X(*S)$. Note
that $\W^0_X(*S)$ admits the structure of an algebra over $\C(\a)$.
We set
\begin{eqnarray*}
\cX&=&\big\{(t,x)\in \C^m\times X\big|\big(1-\sum_{i=1}^mt_i x_i\big)
\prod_{i=1}^{m}t_i(1-t_i)\ne0\big\}
\subset (\P^1)^{2m},\\
\wt S&=&(\P^1)^{2m}-\cX.
\end{eqnarray*}
We define projections
$$\pr_T:\wt X\ni (t,x)\mapsto t\in\C^m,\quad
\pr_X:\wt X\ni (t,x)\mapsto x\in X.$$
Note that
$$\pr_T(\pr_X^{-1}(x))=\{t\in \C^m\mid
(1-\sum_{i=1}^mt_i x_i\big)
\prod_{i=1}^{m}t_i(1-t_i)\ne0\}=\C^m_x$$
for any fixed $x\in X$.
Let $\W^k_{\wt X}(*\wt S)$ be the vector space of rational $k$-forms on $\cX$
with poles only along $\wt S$ and
$\W^{p,q}_{\wt X}(*\wt S)$ be the subspace of $\W^{p+q}_{\wt X}(*\wt S)$
consisting elements which are $p$-forms with respect to the variables
$t_1,\dots,t_m$.
We set
\begin{eqnarray*}
\w_T&=&\sum_{i=1}^{m}\w_{T_i}dt_i\in \W^{1,0}_{\wt X}(*\wt S),\quad
\w_{T_i}=\frac{\b_{0,i}}{t_i}+\frac{\b_{1,i}}{t_i-1}
+\frac{a x_i }{1-t\tr x}
,\\
\w_X&=&\sum_{i=1}^{m}\w_{X_i}dx_i\in \W^{0,1}_{\wt X}(*\wt S),\quad
\w_{X_i}=\frac{a t_i}{1-t\tr x},\\
\w&=&\w_T+\w_X\in \W^{1}_{\wt X}(*\wt S).
\end{eqnarray*}
We define a twisted exterior derivation on $\wt X$ by
$$\na_T=d_T+\w_T\wedge,$$
where $d_T$ is the exterior derivation with respect to the variable $t$, i.e.,
$$d_Tf(t,x)=\sum_{i=1}^m\frac{\pa f}{\pa t_i}(t,x)dt_i.$$
We define an $\W_X^{0}(*S)$-module by
$$
\cH^m(\na_T)=\W_{\wt X}^{m,0}(*\wt S)\big/\na_T(\W_{\wt X}^{m-1,0}(*\wt S)).$$
It admits the structure of a vector bundle over $X$.
We define two sets $\{\f_v\}_{v\in \F_2^m}$ and
$\{\psi_v\}_{v\in \F_2^m}$
of $2^m$ elements of $\W_{\wt X}^{m,0}(*\wt S)$ as
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:frame}
\f_{v}=\frac{dT}{\prod_{i=1}^m(t_i-v_i)},\quad
\psi_v=
\frac{(1-v\tr x)dT}{(1-t\tr x)\prod\limits_{1\le i\le m}(t_i-v_i)}
\end{equation}
where
$v=(v_1,\dots,v_m)\in \F_2^m$.
To express $\psi_v$ as a linear combination of $\f_v$'s, we give
some Lemmas.
\begin{lemma}
\label{lem:lin-comb}
We have
$$\psi_v=\frac{1-v\tr x}{1-t\tr x}\f_v=\f_v+\sum_{j=1}^m\frac{x_jdT}
{(1-t\tr x)\prod_{1\le i\le m}^{i\ne j}(t_i-v_i)}.
$$
\end{lemma}
\begin{proof}
A straightforward calculation implies this lemma.
\end{proof}
\begin{lemma}
\label{lem:cohomolog}
We have
$$
\frac{ax_jdT}{(1-t\tr x)\prod_{1\le i\le m}^{i\ne j}(t_i-v_i)}
=\left\{
\begin{array}{lll}
-\b_{0,j}\f_v-\b_{1,j}\f_{\sigma_j\cdot v}& \textrm{if}& v_j=0,\\[3mm]
-\b_{0,j}\f_{\sigma_j\cdot v}-\b_{1,j}\f_v& \textrm{if}& v_j=1,\\
\end{array}
\right.
$$
as elements of $\cH^m(\na_T)$,
where
$$\sigma_j:\F_2^m\ni v\mapsto \sigma_j\cdot v\in \F_2^m,\quad
\sigma_j\cdot v\equiv v+e_j\bmod 2.$$
\end{lemma}
\begin{proof}
Put
$$\check{\f}_v^j=(-1)^{j-1}\frac{dt_1\wedge\cdots\wedge dt_{j-1}\wedge
dt_{j+1}\wedge\cdots\wedge dt_{m}}{\prod_{1\le i\le m}^{i\ne j}(t_i-v_i)}
\in \W_{\wt X}^{m-1,0}(*\wt S)$$
for $1\le j\le m$ and $v\in \F_2^m$.
Since
\begin{eqnarray*}
& &dt_i\wedge (\frac{\pa}{\pa t_i} \check{\f}_v^j)=0\quad (1\le i\le m),
\\
& &dt_i\wedge (\w_{T_i} \check{\f}_v^j)=0\quad (1\le i\le m,i\ne j),
\end{eqnarray*}
we have
\begin{eqnarray*}
& &\na_T(\check{\f}_v^j)=\w_{T_j}dt_j\wedge \check{\f}_v^j\\
&=&
\frac{\b_{0,j}dT}{t_j\prod\limits_{1\le i\le m}^{i\ne j}(t_i\!-\! v_i)}+
\frac{\b_{1,j}dT}{(t_j\!-\!1)\prod\limits_{1\le i\le m}^{i\ne j}(t_i\!-\! v_i)}
+\frac{ax_jdT}
{(1\!-\! t\tr x)\prod\limits_{1\le i\le m}^{i\ne j}(t_i\!-\! v_i)}.
\end{eqnarray*}
If $v_j=0$ then the first and second terms of the last line are
$\b_{0,j}\f_v$ and $\b_{1,j}\f_{\sigma_j\cdot v}$, respectively;
if $v_j=1$ then they are $\b_{0,j}\f_{\sigma_j\cdot v}$ and $\b_{1,j}\f_v$.
Note that $\na_T(\check{\f}_v^j)=0$ as an element of $\cH^m(\na_T)$.
\end{proof}
\begin{proposition}
\label{prop:simplex}
For any $v\in \F_2^m$, the form
$$
a\psi_v=a\frac{1-v\tr x}{1-t \tr x}\f_v\in \W_{\wt X}^{m,0}(*\wt S)
$$
is equal to
$$\Big[a-\sum_{j=1}^m\beta_{v_j,j}\Big]\f_v
-\sum_{j=1}^m\beta_{1-v_j,j}\f_{\sigma_j\cdot v}
$$
as an element of $\cH^m(\na_T)$.
\end{proposition}
\begin{proof}
Rewrite the right hand side of the identity in Lemma \ref{lem:lin-comb}
by Lemma \ref{lem:cohomolog}. Then we have
$$a\psi_v=a\f_v-
\sum_{1\le j\le m}^{v_j=0}
(\b_{0,j}\f_v+\b_{1,j}\f_{\sigma_j\cdot v})
-\sum_{1\le j\le m}^{v_j=1}
(\b_{0,j}\f_{\sigma_j\cdot v}+\b_{1,j}\f_v).$$
Note that
$$\sum_{1\le j\le m}^{v_j=0}\b_{0,j}\f_v+
\sum_{1\le j\le m}^{v_j=1}\b_{1,j}\f_v=
\Big(\sum_{j=1}^m\b_{v_j,j}\Big)\f_v,$$
and that
$$\b_{1-v_j,j}\f_{\sigma_j\cdot v}=
\left\{\begin{array}{lll}
\b_{1,j}\f_{\sigma_j\cdot v} & \textrm{if} &v_j=0,\\[2mm]
\b_{0,j}\f_{\sigma_j\cdot v} & \textrm{if} &v_j=1,
\end{array}
\right.
$$
for $1\le j\le m$.
\end{proof}
We consider the structure of the fiber of $\cH^m(\na_T)$ at $x$.
Let $\W_{\C_x^m}^p(*x)$ be the pull-back of $\W_{\wt X}^{p,0}(*\wt S)$
under the map $\imath_x:\C_x^m\to \wt X$ for a fixed $x\in X$.
Each fiber of $\cH^m(\na_T)$ at $x$ is isomorphic to
the rational twisted cohomology group
$$H^m(\W_{\C_x^m}^\bu(*x),\na_T)=
\W_{\C_x^m}^m(*x)/\na(\W_{\C_x^m}^{m-1}(*x))$$
on $\C_x^m$ with respect to $\na_T$ induced from the map $\imath_x$.
We denote the pull-back of $\f_v$ under the map
$\imath_x$ by $\f_{x,v}$.
\begin{fact}[\cite{AoKi}]
\label{fact:TCH}
\begin{itemize}
\item[$\mathrm{(i)}$]
The space $H^m(\W_{\C_x^m}^\bu(*x),\na_T)$
is $2^m$-dimensional and it is spanned by
the classes of $\f_{x,v}$ for any $v\in \F_2^m$.
\item[$\mathrm{(ii)}$]
There is a canonical isomorphism $\jmath_x$ from
$H^m(\W_{\C_x^m}^\bu(*x),\na_T)$ to
$$H^m(\cE_c^\bu(x),\na_T)=\ker(\na_T:\cE_c^{m}(x)\to \cE_c^{m+1}(x))
/\na_T(\cE_c^{m-1}(x)),$$
where $\cE_c^k(x)$ is the vector space of smooth $k$-forms
with compact support in $\C_x^m$.
\end{itemize}
\end{fact}
By Fact \ref{fact:TCH}, we have the following.
\begin{proposition}
\label{prop:frame}
The $\W_X^0(*S)$-module $\cH^m(\na_T)$ is of rank $2^m$.
The classes of
$\f_{v}$ $(v\in \F_2^m)$
in $\W_{\wt X}^{m,0}(*\wt S)$ form a frame of the vector bundle
$\cH^m(\na_T)$ over $X$.
\end{proposition}
Set
$$
\cH^m(\na_T^\vee)=
\W_{\wt X}^{m,0}(*\wt S)\big/\na^\vee(\W_{\wt X}^{m-1,0}(*\wt S)),$$
where $\na_T^\vee=d_T-\w_T\wedge$.
This $\W_X^0(*S)$-module can be regarded as vector bundles over $X$.
The classes of $\f_v$ $(v\in \F_2^m)$ also form a frame of
this vector bundle.
Each fiber of $\cH^m(\na^\vee)$ at $x$ is
the rational twisted cohomology group
$H^m(\W_{\C_x^m}^\bu(*x),\na_T^\vee)$
on $\C_x^m$ defined by the coboundary $\na_T^\vee$ instead of $\na_T$.
We define the intersection form between
$H^m(\W_{\C_x^m}^\bu(*x),\na_T)$
and
$H^m(\W_{\C_x^m}^\bu(*x),\na_T^\vee)$
by
$$\cI(\f_x,\f_x')=\int_{\C_x^m}\jmath_x(\f_x)\wedge \f_x'\in \C(\a),$$
where $\f_x,\f_x'\in \W_{\C_x^m}^{m}(*x)$, and $\jmath_x$ is given in
Fact \ref{fact:TCH}.
This integral converges since $\jmath_x(\f_x)$ is a smooth $m$-from
on $\C_x^m$ with compact support.
It is bilinear over $\C(\a)$.
For $w=(w_1,\dots,w_m)\in \F_2^m$ with $|w|=r$, we have
a sequence of $w^{(r)}$, $w^{(r-1)},\dots,$ $w^{(1)}\in \F_2^m$
such that $|w^{(j)}|=j$ and
$$w=w^{(r)}\succ w^{(r-1)} \succ w^{(r-2)}\succ \cdots \succ w^{(1)}\succ
(0,\dots,0).$$
Let $\mathfrak{S}_w $ be the set of such sequences
$(w,w^{(r-1)},\dots,w^{(1)})$ for given $w\in \F_2^m$.
Note that its cardinality is $r!$.
We put
$$A_w=\sum_{(w,w^{(r-1)},\dots,w^{(1)})\in \mathfrak{S}_w}
\frac{1}{\prod_{j=1}^{r} \g_{w^{(j)}}}.$$
For example,
\begin{eqnarray*}
A_{(1,1)}&=&\frac{1}{\g_{(1,1)}}\times\Big(\frac{1}{\g_{(1,0)}}+
\frac{1}{\g_{(0,1)}}\Big)
=
\frac{1}{a-c_1-c_2+2}\times\Big(\frac{1}{a-c_1+1}+\frac{1}{a-c_2+1}\Big),\\
A_{(1,1,1)}&=&
\frac{1}{\g_{(1,1,1)}\g_{(1,1,0)}}\Big(\frac{1}{\g_{(1,0,0)}}+
\frac{1}{\g_{(0,1,0)}}\Big)
+
\frac{1}{\g_{(1,1,1)}\g_{(1,0,1)}}\Big(\frac{1}{\g_{(1,0,0)}}
+\frac{1}{\g_{(0,0,1)}}\Big)\\
& &+\frac{1}{\g_{(1,1,1)}\g_{(0,1,1)}}\Big(\frac{1}{\g_{(0,1,0)}}
+\frac{1}{\g_{(0,0,1)}}\Big)\\
&=&
\frac{1}{a\!-\!c_1\!-\!c_2\!-\!c_3\!+\!3}
\times
\Big[\frac{1}{a\!-\!c_1\!-\!c_2\!+\!2}(\frac{1}{a\!-\!c_1\!+\!1}\!+\!\frac{1}{a\!-\!c_2\!+\!1})\\
& &\!+\!\frac{1}{a\!-\!c_1\!-\!c_3\!+\!2}(\frac{1}{a\!-\!c_1\!+\!1}\!+\!\frac{1}{a\!-\!c_3\!+\!1})
\ \!+\!\frac{1}{a\!-\!c_2\!-\!c_3\!+\!2}(\frac{1}{a\!-\!c_2\!+\!1}\!+\!\frac{1}{a\!-\!c_3\!+\!1})\Big].
\end{eqnarray*}
\begin{proposition}
\label{prop:Int-cohom}
We have
\begin{eqnarray*}
\cI(\f_{x,v},\f_{x,v'})\!&=&\!(2\pi\sqrt{-1})^m
\left[\sum_{w\in \F_2^m} A_w\prod_{1\le i\le m}^{w_i=0}
\frac{\d(v_i,v_i')}{\b_{v_i,i}}\right],\\
\cI(\f_{x,v},\psi_{x,v'})\!&=&\!
(2\pi\sqrt{-1})^m\left\{
\begin{array}{cl}
\displaystyle{\frac{1}{\Pi\b_v}}
,
&\textrm{if } v=v',\\[6mm]
0,& \textrm{otherwise},
\end{array}
\right.\\
\cI(\psi_{x,v},\psi_{x,v'})\!&=&\!
(2\pi\sqrt{-1})^m\left\{
\begin{array}{cl}
\displaystyle{\frac{a-\Sigma\b_v}{a\Pi\b_v}}
,
&\textrm{if } v=v',\\[6mm]
\displaystyle{\frac{-1}{a\prod_{1\le i\le m}^{v_i=v'_i}\b_{v_i,i}}},
&\textrm{if } \#(v\cap v')=m\!-\!1,\\[6mm]
0,& \textrm{otherwise},
\end{array}
\right.
\end{eqnarray*}
where $v=(v_1,\dots,v_m),\ v=(v_1',\dots,v_m')\in \F_2^m$, $\d$ denotes
Kronecker's symbol,
$$\Sigma\b_v=\sum_{i=1}^m\b_{v_i,i},\quad \Pi\b_v=\prod_{i=1}^m\b_{v_i,i},
$$
and we regard
$$\prod_{1\le i\le m}^{w_i=0}
\frac{\d(v_i,v_i')}{\b_{v_i,i}}=1$$
for $w=(1,\dots,1)$.
The matrix
$$C=\frac{1}{(2\pi\sqrt{-1})^m}\cI(\f_{x,v},\f_{x,v'})_{v,v'\in \F_2^m}$$
satisfies
$$\det(C)=
\frac{a^{2^m}}
{\big(\prod_{w\in \F_2^m} \g_w\big)
\big(\prod_{i=1}^m(\b_{0,i}\b_{1,i})^{2^{m-1}}\big)},$$
where we array $v,v'\in \F_2^m$ by the total order in
Definition \ref{def:orders}.
When we assign the parameters to complex values
under the assumption (\ref{eq:non-integral}),
each intersection number is well-defined and $\det(C)\ne 0$;
the matrix $C$ is invertible.
\end{proposition}
\begin{proof}
By using results in \cite{M1},
we can evaluate the intersection numbers.
It is easy to see that
$$\det\Big(\frac{1}{(2\pi\sqrt{-1})^m}
\cI(\f_{x,v},\psi_{x,v'})_{v,v'\in \F_2^m}\Big)=
\frac
{1}
{\prod_{i=1}^m(\b_{0,i}\b_{1,i})^{2^{m-1}}}.
$$
By following the method in Appendix of \cite{MY}, we have
$$\det\Big(\frac{1}{(2\pi\sqrt{-1})^m}
\cI(\psi_{x,v},\psi_{x,v'})_{v,v'\in \F_2^m}\Big)=
\frac
{\prod_{w\in \F_2^m} \g_w}
{a^{2^m}\prod_{i=1}^m(\b_{0,i}\b_{1,i})^{2^{m-1}}}.
$$
These imply the value of $\det(C)$.
\end{proof}
By this fact, we can regard the intersection form $\cI$ as
that between $\cH^m(\na_T)$ and $\cH^m(\na_T^\vee)$.
It is bilinear over $\W_X^0(*S)$ and
the intersection matrix $C$
is defined by the frame $\{\f_v\}_{v\in \F_2^m}$.
Let $\cH^m_{\C(\a)}(\na_T)$ (resp. $\cH^m_{\C(\a)}(\na_T^\vee)$)
be the linear span of $\f_v$ $(v\in \F_2^m)$
over the field $\C(\a)$ contained in $\cH^m(\na_T)$
(resp. $\cH^m(\na_T^\vee)$).
We have
$$\psi_v\in \cH^m_{\C(\a)}(\na_T)$$
for any $v\in \F_2^m$ by Proposition \ref{prop:simplex}.
\section{Connection}
We introduce operators
$$\na_{k}=\pa_{k}+\frac{a t_k}{1-t\tr x},\quad (k=1,\dots,m),$$
then we have
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:parderiv}
\pa_k\int_{\mathrm{reg}(0,1)^m} u(t,x)\f =\int_{\mathrm{reg}(0,1)^m}
u(t,x)(\na_k \f),
\end{equation}
where $\mathrm{reg}(0,1)^m$ is the regularization of the domain $(0,1)^m$ of
integration defined in \cite{AoKi}.
Thanks to the regularization,
the integral converges whenever we assign complex values to parameters
under the condition (\ref{eq:non-integral}), and
the order of the integration and the operator $\pa_k$ can be changed.
We set
$$\na_X=\sum_{i=1}^m dx_i\wedge\na_i=d_X+\w_X\wedge,$$
where $d_X$ is the exterior derivation with respect to $x$:
$$d_Xf=\sum_{i=1}^m(\pa_i f) dx_i,\quad f\in \W^0_{\wt X}(*\wt S).
$$
It is easy to that
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:commute}
\na_T\circ\na_X+\na_X\circ\na_T=0.
\end{equation}
We set
\begin{eqnarray*}
\cH^{m,1}(\na_T)&=&
\W_{\wt X}^{m,1}(*\wt S)\big/\na_T(\W_{\wt X}^{m-1,1}(*\wt S)),\\
\cH^{m,1}(\na_T^\vee)&=&
\W_{\wt X}^{m,1}(*\wt S)\big/\na_T^\vee(\W_{\wt X}^{m-1,1}(*\wt S)).
\end{eqnarray*}
\begin{proposition}
\label{prop:connection}
There is a natural map $\na_X:\cH^m(\na_T)\to \cH^{m,1}(\na_T)$ induced from
the derivation $\na_X$.
\end{proposition}
\begin{proof}
We have only to show that if $\psi\in \na_T(\W_{\wt X}^{m-1,0}(*\wt S))$
then
$$\na_X(\psi)\in \na_T(\W_{\wt X}^{m-1,1}(*\wt S)).$$
For any $\psi\in \na_T(\W_{\wt X}^{m-1,0}(*\wt S))$,
there exists
$f\in \W_{\wt X}^{m-1,0}(*\wt S)$ such that $\na_T(f)=\psi$.
By (\ref{eq:commute}), we have
$$\na_X(\psi)=\na_X\circ \na_T(f)=-\na_T\circ \na_X(f)=\na_T(-\na_X(f)),$$
which belongs to $\na_T(\W_{\wt X}^{m-1,1}(*\wt S))$.
\end{proof}
By this proposition, we can regard the map $\na_X$ as a connection of the
vector bundle $\cH^m(\na_T)$ over $X$.
It is characterized as follows.
\begin{proposition}
\label{prop:PDE}
Let $v=(v_1,\dots,v_m)$ be an element of $\F_2^m$. If
$v_k=0$ then
$$\na_{k}(\f_v)=\frac{1}{x_k}
(-\b_{0,k}\f_v-\b_{1,k}\f_{\sigma_k\cdot v});$$
if $v_k=1$ then
$$
\na_{k}(\f_v)=
\frac{1}{x_k}(-\b_{0,k}\f_{\sigma_k\cdot v}-\b_{1,k}\f_v)
+\frac{1}{1-v\tr x}\Big[\big(a-\sum_{j=1}^m\beta_{v_j,j}\big)\f_v
+\sum_{j=1}^m\beta_{1-v_j,j}\f_{\sigma_j\cdot v}\Big].
$$
\end{proposition}
\begin{proof}
Since $\pa_{k}\cdot \f_v=0$, we have
$$\na_{k}(\f_v)=\w_{k}\cdot \f_v=\frac{at_k}{1-t\tr x}
\cdot \frac{dT}{\prod\limits_{i=1}^m(t_i-v_i)}.
$$
If $v_i=0$ then
$$
\na_{k}(\f_v)=\frac{1}{x_k}\cdot
\frac{ax_x dT }{(1-t\tr x)\prod\limits_{1\le i\le m}^{i\ne k}(t_i-v_i)}
=\frac{-\b_{0,k}\f_v-\b_{1,k}\f_{\sigma_k\cdot v}}{x_k}
$$
by Lemma \ref{lem:cohomolog}. If $v_i=1$ then
\begin{eqnarray*}
\na_{k}(\f_v)&=&
\frac{a(t_k-1)+a}{1-t\tr x}
\cdot \dfrac{dT}{\prod\limits_{i=1}^m(t_i- v_i)}
=
\dfrac{a\; dT}{(1-t \tr x)\prod\limits_{1\le i\le m}^{i\ne k}(t_i- v_i)}
+\dfrac{a\; dT}{(1- t \tr x)\prod\limits_{i=1}^m(t_i- v_i)}\\
&=&
\frac{-\b_{0,k}\f_{\sigma_k\cdot v}-\b_{1,k}\f_v}{x_k}+
\frac{a\psi_v}{1-v\tr x}
\end{eqnarray*}
by Lemma \ref{lem:cohomolog}.
Rewrite the last term by Proposition \ref{prop:simplex}.
\end{proof}
\begin{cor}
\label{cor:higher}
For any
$v=(v_1,\dots,v_m)\in \F_2^m$,
we have
$$\Big(\prod_{1\le i\le m}^{v_i=1}x_i\na_i\Big)\cdot \f_{(0,\dots,0)}
=\sum_{w\preceq v}\Big[\prod_{1\le i\le m}^{v_i=1}(-\b_{w_i,i})\Big]\f_w.$$
\end{cor}
\begin{proof}
Use the induction on $|v|$ and Proposition \ref{prop:PDE}.
\end{proof}
We give some examples:
\begin{eqnarray*}
(x_1\na_{1})\cdot \f_{(0,0,0)}&=&-\b_{0,1}\f_{(0,0,0)}-\b_{1,1}\f_{(1,0,0)}
,\\
(x_1x_2\na_{1}\na_{2})\cdot \f_{(0,0,0)}
&=&\b_{0,1}\b_{0,2}\f_{(0,0,0)}+\b_{1,1}\b_{0,2}\f_{(1,0,0)}
+\b_{0,1}\b_{1,2}\f_{(0,1,0)}+\b_{1,1}\b_{1,2}\f_{(1,1,0)},\\
(x_1x_2x_3\na_{1}\na_{2}\na_{3})\cdot \f_{(0,0,0)}
&=&-\b_{0,1}\b_{0,2}\b_{0,3}\f_{(0,0,0)}-\b_{1,1}\b_{0,2}\b_{0,3}\f_{(1,0,0)}\\
& &-\b_{0,1}\b_{1,2}\b_{0,3}\f_{(0,1,0)}-\b_{0,1}\b_{0,2}\b_{1,3}\f_{(0,0,1)}\\
& &-\b_{1,1}\b_{1,2}\b_{0,3}\f_{(1,1,0)}-\b_{1,1}\b_{0,2}\b_{1,3}\f_{(1,0,1)}\\
& &-\b_{0,1}\b_{1,2}\b_{1,3}\f_{(0,1,1)}-\b_{1,1}\b_{1,2}\b_{1,3}\f_{(1,1,1)}.\\
\end{eqnarray*}
To express $\na_X$ restricted to $\cH^m_{\C(\a)}(\na_T)$
by the intersection form $\cI$, we give some lemmas and a proposition.
\begin{lemma}
\label{lem:intinv}
Let $\f$ be an element of $\cH^m_{\C(\a)}(\na_T)$ and $\f'$ be
that of $\cH^m_{\C(\a)}(\na_T^\vee)$. Then we have
$$\cI(\na_i\f,\f')+\cI(\f,\na_i^\vee\f')=0,
$$
where $1\le i\le m$ and
$\displaystyle{\na_i^\vee=\pa_{i}-\frac{a t_i}{1-t\tr x}}$.
\end{lemma}
\begin{proof}
It is clear by Proposition \ref{prop:Int-cohom}
that
$$\pa_i\cI(\f,\f')=0$$
for $1\le i\le m$.
For any compact set $K$ in $\C_x^m$, we have
\begin{eqnarray*}
& &\pa_i\int_{K}\f\wedge \f'=
\int_{K}\pa_i\f\wedge \f'+\int_{K}\f\wedge \pa_i\f'\\
&=&\int_{K}\pa_i(u(t,x)\cdot \f)\wedge \frac{\f'}{u(t,x)}+
\int_{K}u(t,x)\cdot\f\wedge \pa_i\Big(\frac{\f'}{u(t,x)}\Big)
=\int_{K}(\na_i\f)\wedge \f'+\int_{K}\f\wedge (\na_i^\vee\f').
\end{eqnarray*}
We can show that the commutativity of $\jmath_x$ and $\na_i^\vee$
by following results in \cite{M2}.
These imply this lemma.
\end{proof}
We define maps
$$
\begin{array}{llcl}
\cR_{k}&:\cH^m(\na_{T})\ni \f \mapsto&
\underset{x_k=0}{\mathrm{Res}}
(\na_X(\f))
&\in \cH^m(\na_{T}),\\
\cR_{k,v}&:\cH^m(\na_{T})\ni
\f \mapsto& \underset{x_k=S_v\cap L_k}{\mathrm{Res}}(\na_X(\f))
&\in \cH^m(\na_{T}),
\end{array}
$$
where $\underset{x_k=0}{\mathrm{Res}}(\eta)$ and
$\underset{x_k=S_v\cap L_k}{\mathrm{Res}}(\eta)$
are the residues of
$\eta\in \W^{m,1}_{\wt X}(*\wt S)$ with respect to the variable $x_k$
at $0$ and at the intersection point $S_v\cap L_k$ of
$S_v$ and the line $L_k$ in $X$ fixing the variables
$x_1,\dots,x_{k-1},x_{k+1},\dots,x_m$.
\begin{proposition}
[Orthogonal Principle]
\label{prop:orthogonal}
\begin{itemize}
\item[$\mathrm{(i)}$]
For $\f\in \cH^m_{\C(\a)}(\na_T)$ and $\f '\in \cH^m_{\C(\a)}(\na^\vee)$,
we have
$$
\cI(\cR_{k}(\f ),\f ')+\cI(\f ,\cR_{k}^\vee(\f '))=0,\quad
\cI(\cR_{k,v}(\f ),\f ')+\cI(\f ,\cR_{k,v}^\vee(\f '))=0,
$$
where $\cR_{k}^\vee$ and $\cR_{k,v}^\vee$ are naturally defined by
$\na_X^\vee=\sum_{i=1}^m dx_i\na_i^\vee$ and the residue.
\item[$\mathrm{(ii)}$]
Let $\f $ and $\f '$ be eigenvectors
of $\cR_{k}$ and $\cR_{k}^\vee$ (resp. $\cR_{k,v}$ and $\cR_{k,v}^\vee)$
with eigenvalues $\mu$ and $\mu'$, respectively.
If $\mu+\mu'\ne0$ then $\cI(\f ,\f ')=0$.
\end{itemize}
\end{proposition}
\begin{proof} (i)\quad
We have only to see coefficients of $1/x_k$ and $1/(1-v\tr x)$
of the identity in Lemma \ref{lem:intinv}.
\smallskip
\noindent (ii) \quad
Note that
$$
\cI(\cR_{k}(\f ),\f ')+\cI(\f ,\cR_{k}^\vee(\f '))=
\cI(\mu\f ,\f ')+\cI(\f ,\mu'\f ')=(\mu+\mu')\cI(\f ,\f ').
$$
By (i), we have $(\mu+\mu')\cI(\f ,\f ')=0$.
\end{proof}
\begin{lemma}
\label{lem:residue}
\begin{itemize}
\item[$\mathrm{(i)}$]
Suppose that $c_k\ne1$ when we assign a complex value to it.
The eigenvalues of the map $\cR_{k}$ are $0$ and $-\b_{0,k}-\b_{1,k}=1-c_k$
The eigenspace $W_k$ of the map $\cR_{k}$ with eigenvalue $0$
is $2^{m-1}$-dimensional and expressed as
$$W_k=\la \f_v-\f_{\sigma_k\cdot v}\mid v\in \F_2^m(0_k)\ra,$$
which is the linear span of $\f_v-\f_{\sigma_k\cdot v}$ for elements $v$
in
$$\F_2^m(0_k)=\{v=(v_1,\dots,v_m)\in \F_2^m\mid v_k=0\}.$$
The eigenspace of the map $\cR_{k}$ with eigenvalue $1-c_k$
is $2^{m-1}$-dimensional and
$$W_k^\perp=\la \b_{0,k}\f_v+\b_{1,k}\f_{\sigma_k\cdot v}
\mid v\in \F_2^m(0_k)\ra.$$
\item[$\mathrm{(ii)}$] Suppose that
$\Sigma\b_v-a
\ne 0$ for a given $v\in \F_2^m$
when we assign complex values to them.
The eigenvalues of the map $\cR_{k,v}$ are $\Sigma\b_v-a$ and $0$.
The eigenspace $W_v$ of the map $\cR_{k,v}$ with eigenvalue $\Sigma\b_v-a$
is spanned by $\psi_v$, and that with eigenvalue $0$
is its orthogonal complement
$$W_v^\perp=\{\f\in \cH^m_{\C(\a)}(\na_T)\mid \cI(\f,\psi_v)=0\},$$
which is spanned by $\f_w$ for $w\ne v$.
\end{itemize}
\end{lemma}
\begin{proof}
(i) Let $v$ be an element of $\F_2^m(0_k)$.
Proposition \ref{prop:PDE} implies that
\begin{eqnarray*}
\cR_k(\f_v-\f_{\sigma_k\cdot v})
&=&(-\b_{0,k}\f_v-\b_{1,k}\f_{\sigma_k\cdot v})
-(-\b_{0,k}\f_{\sigma_k\cdot (\sigma_k\cdot v)}-\b_{1,k}\f_{\sigma_k\cdot v})=0,
\\[2mm]
\cR_k(\b_{0,k}\f_v+\b_{1,k}\f_{\sigma_k\cdot v})
&=&\b_{0,k}(-\b_{0,k}\f_v-\b_{1,k}\f_{\sigma_k\cdot v})
+\b_{1,k}(-\b_{0,k}\f_{\sigma_k\cdot (\sigma_k\cdot v)}
-\b_{1,k}\f_{\sigma_k\cdot v})\\
&=&(-\b_{0,k}-\b_{1,k})(\b_{0,k}\f_v+\b_{1,k}\f_{\sigma_k\cdot v}).
\end{eqnarray*}
Thus $\f_v- \f_{\sigma_k\cdot v }$ is an eigenvector of $\cR_k$ with
eigenvalue $0$, and
$\b_{0,k}\f_v+\b_{1,k}\f_{\sigma_k\cdot v}$
is an eigenvector of $\cR_k$ with
eigenvalue $1-c_k$
for each $v\in \F_2^m(0_k)$.
Hence these eigenspaces are
$2^{m-1}$-dimensional.
\medskip\noindent
(ii) Propositions \ref{prop:simplex} and \ref{prop:PDE} imply that
\begin{eqnarray*}
& &\cR_{k,v}(a\psi_v)=
\cR_{k,v}\Big[\big(a-\sum_{j=1}^m\beta_{v_j,j}\big)\f_v
-\sum_{j=1}^m\beta_{1-v_j,j}\f_{\sigma_j\cdot v}\Big]\\
&=&-\big(a-\sum_{j=1}^m\beta_{v_j,j}\big)
\Big[\big(a-\sum_{j=1}^m\beta_{v_j,j}\big)\f_v
-\sum_{j=1}^m\beta_{1-v_j,j}\f_{\sigma_j\cdot v}\Big]
=(\Sigma\b_v-a)(a\psi_v).
\end{eqnarray*}
Note that the image of $\cR_{k,v}$ is spanned by $\psi_v$.
Proposition \ref{prop:PDE} also implies that $\cR_{k,v}\f_w=0$ for $w\ne v$.
By Proposition \ref{prop:Int-cohom},
they are orthogonal to
$\psi_v$ with respect to the intersection form $\cI$.
\end{proof}
\begin{lemma}
\label{lem:projection}
Suppose that $c_k\ne1$ when we assign a complex value to it.
Then the projection $\pr_k:\cH^m_{\C(\a)}(\na_T)\to W_k$
is expressed as
$$\pr_k(\f)=
\sum_{v\in \F_2^m(0_k)}
\frac{\b_{1,k}\Pi\b_v
}
{(2\pi\sqrt{-1})^m(\b_{0,k}+\b_{1,k})}
\cI\big(\f,(\psi_v\!-\!\psi_{\sigma_k\cdot v})\big)
(\f_v\!-\!\f_{\sigma_k\cdot v}).$$
\end{lemma}
\begin{proof}
By Proposition \ref{prop:Int-cohom}, we have
$$
\frac{\b_{1,k}\Pi\b_v
}{(2\pi\sqrt{-1})^m(\b_{0,k}+\b_{1,k})}
\cI\big((\f_w-\f_{\sigma_k\cdot w}),
(\psi_v-\psi_{\sigma_k\cdot v})\big)
=\d(v,w)
$$
for $w\in \F_2^m(0_k)$.
Since
$$\cI\big((\b_{0,k}\f_v+\b_{1,k}\f_{\sigma_k\cdot v}),
(\psi_v-\psi_{\sigma_k\cdot v})\big)=0,$$
we have
$$\cI(\f,(\psi_v-\psi_{\sigma_k\cdot v}))=0$$
for any element $\f\in W_k^\perp$.
The restriction of the expression of $\pr_k$ to $W_k$ is the identity,
and that to $W_k^\perp$ is the zero map.
\end{proof}
\begin{lemma}
\label{lem:refA}
\begin{itemize}
\item[$\mathrm{(i)}$]
The map $\cR_{k}:\cH^m_{\C(\a)}(\na_T)\to \cH^m_{\C(\a)}(\na_T)$
is expressed as
$$\f\mapsto (1\!-\!c_k)\f\!+\!
\sum_{v\in \F_2^m(0_k)}
\frac{\b_{1,k}\Pi\b_v
}{(2\pi\sqrt{-1})^m}
\cI\big(\f,(\psi_v\!-\!\psi_{\sigma_k\cdot v})\big)
(\f_v\!-\!\f_{\sigma_k\cdot v}).
$$
\item[$\mathrm{(ii)}$]
The map $\cR_{k,v}:\cH^m_{\C(\a)}(\na_T)\to \cH^m_{\C(\a)}(\na_T)$
is expressed as
$$\f \mapsto
\frac{-a\Pi\b_v
}{(2\pi\sqrt{-1})^m}\cI(\f ,\psi_{v})\psi_{v}.$$
\end{itemize}
\end{lemma}
\begin{proof}
(i) \quad
At first, we assume that $c_k\ne1$ when we assign a complex value to it.
The projection from $\cH^m_{\C(\a)}(\na_T)$ to
the eigenspace $W_k^\perp$ of $\cR_k$ with eigenvalue $1-c_k$
is expressed as $\f\mapsto \f-\pr_k(\f)$. Thus we have
$$\cR_k(\f)=(1-c_k)(\f-\pr_k(\f))=(1-c_k)\f+(\b_{0,k}+\b_{1,k})\pr_k(\f).$$
Lemma \ref{lem:projection} implies the expression.
Note that this expression is valid even in the case $c_k=1$.
\smallskip\noindent
(ii)\quad
At first, we assume $\Sigma\b_v-a\ne0$ for a given $v\in \F_2^m$
when we assign complex values to them.
By Lemma \ref{lem:residue} (ii),
$\cR_{k,v}$ is characterized as
$$\f \mapsto (\Sigma\b_v-a)\cI(\f ,\psi_{v})
\cI(\psi_{v},\psi_{v})^{-1}\psi_{v}.$$
By Proposition \ref{prop:Int-cohom}, we have
$$\cI(\psi_{v},\psi_{v})
=(2\pi\sqrt{-1})^m\frac{-(\Sigma\b_v-a)}{a\Pi\b_v
},$$
which gives the expression.
This expression is valid even in the case $\Sigma\b_v-a=0$.
\end{proof}
\begin{theorem}
\label{th:connection}
Suppose that (\ref{eq:non-integral})
when we assign complex values to the parameters.
The restriction of $\na_X$ to the space $\cH^m_{\C(\a)}(\na_T)$
is expressed as
\begin{eqnarray*}
\f&\mapsto&\hspace{4mm}
\sum_{k=1}^m
(1-c_k)\dfrac{dx_k}{x_k}\wedge \f
+\sum_{k=1}^m
\sum_{v\in \F_2^m(0_k)}\dfrac{\b_{1,k}\Pi\b_v}{(2\pi\sqrt{-1})^m}
\cI(\f,(\psi_v-\psi_{\sigma_k\cdot v}))
\dfrac{dx_k}{x_k}\wedge(\f_v-\f_{\sigma_k\cdot v})\\
& &
{+\sum_{v\in \F_2^m}
\dfrac{-a\Pi\b_v}
{(2\pi\sqrt{-1})^m}\cI(\f ,\psi_{v})\dfrac{d(1-v\tr x)}{1-v\tr x}
\wedge\psi_{v},}
\end{eqnarray*}
where
$\f_v$ and $\psi_v$ are given in (\ref{eq:frame}) and
Proposition \ref{prop:simplex}, respectively,
$\Pi\b_v=\prod_{i=1}^m\b_{v_i,i}$ for
$v=(v_1,\dots,v_m)\in \F_2^m$,
and we regard $d(1-v\tr x)$ as $0$ for $v=(0,\dots,0)$.
\end{theorem}
\begin{proof}
By Proposition \ref{prop:PDE}, we see that the connection $\na_X$
admits simple poles only along $S\subset (\P^1)^m$.
Thus it is expressed as
$$\sum_{k=1}^m \Big(
\frac{\cR_{k}}{x_k}-\sum_{v\in \F_2^m}\frac{\cR_{k,v}}{1-v\tr x}
\Big)dx_k.$$
Use the expressions of $\cR_{k}$ and $\cR_{k,v}$ in Lemma \ref{lem:refA}.
\end{proof}
By using our frame $\{\f_v\}_{v\in \F_2^m}$ of $\cH^m(\na_T)$,
we represent the connection $\na_X$ by a matrix.
We set a column vector $\varPhi$ by arraying $\f_v$'s by the total order
in Definition \ref{def:orders}:
$$\varPhi=\tr(\f_{(0,\dots,0)},\f_{(1,0,\dots,0)},\f_{(0,1,0,\dots,0)},
\dots,\f_{(1,\dots,1)}).$$
Let $e_v$ $(v\in \F_2^m)$ be the unit row vectors of size $2^m$ satisfying
$\f_v=e_v\varPhi.$
Put
$$f_v=\frac{a-\Sigma\b_v}{a} e_v
-\sum_{j=1}^m\frac{\b_{1-v_j,j}}{a}e_{\sigma_j\cdot v},$$
then we have
$$\psi_v=f_v\varPhi$$
by Proposition \ref{prop:simplex}.
\begin{cor}
\label{cor:connection matrix}
Suppose that (\ref{eq:non-integral})
when we assign complex values to the parameters.
The map $\na_X$ is represented
by the frame $\{\f_v\}_{v\in \F_2^m}$ of $\cH^m(\na_T)$ as
$$\na_X \varPhi=\Xi_\varPhi\wedge \varPhi,$$
\begin{eqnarray*}
\Xi_\varPhi&=&
\hspace{4mm}
{\sum_{k=1}^m(1-c_k)\mathrm{id}_{2^m}\dfrac{dx_k}{x_k}}
{+\sum_{k=1}^m
\sum_{v\in \F_2^m(0_k)}(\b_{1,k}\Pi\b_v)
C\tr(f_v-f_{\sigma_k\cdot v})(e_v-e_{\sigma_k\cdot v})
\dfrac{dx_k}{x_k}}\\
& &{+\sum_{v\in \F_2^m}
{(-a\Pi\b_v)}C\tr f_v f_v\dfrac{d(1-v\tr x)}{1-v\tr x},}
\end{eqnarray*}
where $\mathrm{id}_{2^m}$ is the unit matrix of size $2^m$ and
the intersection matrix $C$ is given in Proposition
\ref{prop:Int-cohom}.
\end{cor}
\begin{proof}
We identify a row vector $z=(\dots,z_v,\dots)\in \C(\a)^{2^m}$ with
an element $\f=z\; \varPhi\in \cH^m_{\C(\a)}(\na_T)$.
Then the intersection form is expressed as
$$\cI(\f,\psi_{v})=(2\pi\sqrt{-1})^m\; z\;C\tr f_v.$$
Thus we have our representation $\Xi_\varPhi$ of $\na_X$
by Theorem \ref{th:connection}.
\end{proof}
We define a vector valued function $F(x)=\tr(\dots, F_v(x),\dots)$
in $\D$ by
$$
F_{(0,\dots,0)}(x)=
\Big(\prod_{i=1}^m \frac{\G(b_i)\G(c_i\!-\!b_i)}{\G(c_i)}\Big)
F_A(a,b,c;x),\quad
F_v(x)=\Big(\prod_{1\le i\le m}^{v_i=1}x_i\pa_i\Big)\cdot F_{(0,\dots,0)}(x),
$$
where $F_v(x)$ $(v\in \F_2^m)$ are arrayed by the total order
in Definition \ref{def:orders}.
\begin{cor}[Pfaffian system of $F_A(a,b,c)$]
\label{cor:Pfaffian}
Suppose that (\ref{eq:non-integral})
when we assign complex values to the parameters.
The vector valued function $F(x)$ satisfies a Pfaffian system
$$d_XF(x)=(P\; \Xi_\varPhi\; P^{-1}) F(x),$$
where
$\Xi_\varPhi$ is given in Corollary \ref{cor:connection matrix}
and $P=(p_{vw})_{v,w\in\F_2^m}$ is defined by
$$p_{vw}=
\left\{
\begin{array}{cl}
\displaystyle{\prod_{1\le i\le m}^{v_i=1}(-\b_{w_i,i})}
&\textrm{if } v\succeq w, \\[6mm]
0&\textrm{otherwise}.
\end{array}
\right.
$$
\end{cor}
\begin{proof}
By the integral representation (\ref{eq:Euler}) of $F_A(a,b,c;x)$ and
the equation (\ref{eq:parderiv}), we have
$$
F_v(x)=\int_{\mathrm{reg}(0,1)^m}u(t,x)
\Big(\prod_{1\le i\le m}^{v_i=1}x_i\na_i\Big)\cdot \f_{(0,\dots,0)}.
$$
Corollary \ref{cor:higher} implies
$$F(x)=P\int_{\mathrm{reg}(0,1)^m}u(t,x)\varPhi.$$
Since $P$ is a lower triangular matrix with non-zero diagonal entries,
it is invertible.
Hence
$F(x)$ satisfies the Pfaffian system.
\end{proof}
\begin{remark}
The $(v,w)$-entry of $P^{-1}$ is
$$
\left\{
\begin{array}{cl}
{\prod\limits_{1\le i\le m}^{v_i=1,w_i=0}\b_{0,i}}\Big/
{\prod\limits_{1\le i\le m}^{v_i=1}(-\b_{1,i})}
&\textrm{if } v\succeq w,
\\[6mm]
0&\textrm{otherwise}.
\end{array}
\right.
$$
\end{remark}
|
\section{Introduction}
\IEEEPARstart{D}{engue} fever (DF) is a mosquito-borne infectious disease caused by the viruses of the genus \emph{Togaviridae}, subgenus \emph{Flavirus}. The transmission of this disease is through the bites of vectors (aedes aegypti, aedes albopictus) carrying the viruses belonging to \emph{Flavi genus}~\cite{Gubler1998}. From its first appearance in the Philippines in $1953$, the disease has been identified as one of the most important arthropod-borne viral disease in humans~\cite{monath1994}. Dengue virus infection has been reported in more than $100$ countries, with $2.5$ billion people living in areas where dengue is endemic. The annual occurrence is estimated to be around $100$ million cases of DF and $250,000$ cases of dengue hemorrhagic fever (DHF).
The diagnosis of dengue fever presents great challenges as the symptoms overlap with other febrile illnesses. Accurate diagnosis is possible only after conducting definitive tests such as enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) and real-time polymerase-chain reaction (RT-PCR) which are based on nucleic and acid hybridization~\cite{DePaula2004}. A recent study~\cite{Chen2008} on the behavior of C-type lectin domain family $5$, member A (CLEC5A) gene may result in a strategy for reducing tissue damage which would help improve the odds of survival of the patients suffering from DHF and dengue shock syndrome (DSS). A multivariate model was developed in~\cite{Ibrahim2004} for predicting hemoglobin (Hb) using predictors such as reactance obtained from a single frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis, sex, nausea/vomiting sensation and weight. These strategies can be employed only after $2-12$ days from the onset of the illness and require state-of-the-art laboratory facilities.
The World Health Organization (WHO) has arrived at a classification scheme for identifying the infected individuals based on clinical symptoms and laboratory features. The development of predictive models for diagnosis of dengue fever based on these schemes is affected by missing or incomplete data records in the clinical databases~\cite{ColleenMNorris2000} which may arise due to any or all of the following reasons (i) value being lost (erased or deleted) (ii) not recorded (iii) incorrect measurements (iv) equipment errors and (v) an expert not attaching any importance to a particular clinical procedure. Usually data is not collected from an organized research point of view~\cite{Cios2002}. The presence of large number of clinical symptoms and laboratory features requires one to search large sub spaces for optimal feature subsets. These issues unless addressed appropriately would hinder the development of accurate and computationally effective diagnostic system.
In view of the above challenges, we present the following novel features of our work:
\begin{itemize}
\item to identify the missing values (MV) in the data set and impute them by using a newly developed novel imputation procedure;
\item to identify a set of clinical symptoms that would enable early detection of suspected dengue in children and adults, which reduces the risk of transmission of the dengue fever in the community;
\item to identify the laboratory features and clinical symptoms that would enable better diagnosis and understanding of the disease in suspected dengue individuals. This renders optimal utilization of the laboratory resources required for confirmed diagnosis;
\item to build a predictive model that has a capability of rendering effective diagnosis in realtime. Further we compare its performance with other state-of-the-art methods used in the diagnosis of dengue fever.
\end{itemize}
The present paper is organized as follows: A survey of the state-of-the-art techniques for the diagnosis of dengue fever is presented in Section~\ref{review}, while in Section~\ref{chap8:sec1} we describe our novel methodology for computer-aided clinical diagnosis of dengue. The performance evaluation of the methodologies is described in Section~\ref{evalmethods}. The description of the data sets and the experimental results are presented in Section~\ref{chap8:sec3}. We present a comparison of our new imputation methodology with other imputation methods in Section~\ref{perMV}. In Section \ref{chap8:sec4} we discuss the computational complexity of our new method. Comparison of our new methodology with other state-of-the-art methods forms the subject of Section \ref{chap8:sec5}. Conclusions and discussion are deferred to Section~\ref{chap8:sec6}.
\section{Survey of the state-of-the-art techniques for diagnosis of dengue fever}
\label{review}
Logistic regression method was employed to identify clinical symptoms and laboratory features in $381$ individuals, out of which $148$ were confirmed dengue~\cite{Chadwick2006}. The data records with missing values (MV) are ignored and are deleted from the data set. In~\cite{ramos2009}, the study was conducted on clinical records comprising of $341$ children and $597$ adults out of which $38$ and $107$ respectively were laboratory-confirmed positive dengue cases. In this study the data fields that are incomplete or inaccurate for all suspected dengue cases were replaced with the known values corresponding to the information in the medical charts. A C4.5 decision tree which has an in built mechanism of handling MV was employed in~\cite{Tanner2008} to develop a diagnostic algorithm to differentiate dengue from non-dengue illness on a data set comprising of $1200$ patients of which $173$ had DF, $171$ had DHF and $20$ had DSS. A support vector machine (SVM) based methodology was employed in~\cite{gomes2010} to analyze the expression pattern of $12$ genes of $28$ dengue patients of which $13$ were DHF and $15$ were DF cases. A set of seven influential genes were identified through selective removal of expression data of these twelve genes.
In the above studies the MV were either removed~\cite{Chadwick2006}, or filled with approximate values based on medical charts~\cite{ramos2009}. These approaches would lead to biased estimates and may either reduce or exaggerate the statistical power. Methods such as logistic regression, maximum likelihood and expectation maximization have been employed for imputation of MV, but they can be applied only on data sets that are either nominal or numeric. There are other imputation methods such as k-nearest neighbor imputation (KNNI)~\cite{BM2003}; k-means clustering imputation (KMI)~\cite{DSSL2004}; weighted k-nearest neighbor imputation (WKNNI)~\cite{TCSBHTBA2001} and fuzzy k-means clustering imputation (FKMI)~\cite{DSSL2004} that have been applied on other data sets but not on dengue fever data sets. However, the authors in~\cite{gomes2010,Chadwick2006,ramos2009} have employed methods such as odds ratio (OR) and selective inclusion or exclusion of attributes for obtaining features sub sets of data sets of dengue fever. But these methods do not yeild effective diagnosis as all interactions or correlations between the features and the diagnosis are not considered in these studies.
\section{A new methodology for computer-aided diagnosis of dengue fever}
\label{chap8:sec1}
Motivated by the above issues we propose a new methodology comprising of a novel non parametric missing value imputation method that can be applied on data sets consisting of attributes that are of the type categorical (nominal) and/or numeric (integer or real). The methodology proposed in~\cite{Freund1999} ignores missing values while generating the decision tree, which renders lower prediction accuracies. We have embedded the new imputation strategy (Section~\ref{chap9:RNI}) before generating the alternating decision tree which results in the improved performance of the classifier on data sets having missing values. Also, we develop an effective wrapper based features selection algorithm in order to identify the most influential features subset. The present methodology comprises in utilizing the new imputation embedded alternating decision tree and the wrapper based features subset selection algorithm. This methodology can predict the diagnosis of dengue in real time. In fact the machine knowledge acquired by utilizing this novel methodology will be useful to diagnose other individuals based on clinical symptoms and laboratory features where the clinical decision is unavailable. We designate this novel methodology as NM throughout this work.
\subsection{Data representation}
A clinical data set can be represented as a set \emph{S} having row vectors $(R_{1},R_{2},\hdots,R_{m})$ and column vectors $(C_{1},C_{2},\hdots,C_{n})$. Each record can be represented as an ordered n-tuple of clinical and laboratory attributes $(A_{i1}, A_{i2},\hdots, A_{i(n-1)}, A_{in})$ for each $\emph{i}=1,2,\hdots,m$ where the last attribute $(A_{in})$ for each \emph{i}, represents the physician's diagnosis to which the record $(A_{i1}, A_{i2},\hdots, A_{i(n-1)})$ belongs and without loss of generality we assume that there are no missing elements in this set. Each attribute of an element in \emph{S} that is $A_{ij}$ for $\emph{i}=1,2,\hdots,m$ and $\emph{j}=1,2,\hdots,n-1$ can either be a categorical (nominal) or numeric (real or integer) type. Clearly all the sets considered are finite sets.
\subsection{A new non-parametric imputation strategy}
\label{chap9:RNI}
The first step in any imputation algorithm is to compute the proximity measure in the feature space between the clinical records to identify the nearest neighbors from where the values can be imputed. The most popular metric for quantifying the similarity between any two records is the Euclidean distance. Even though this metric is simpler to compute, it is sensitive to the scales of the features involved. Further it does not account for correlation between the features. Also, the categorical variables can only be quantified by counting measures which calls for the development of effective strategies for computing the similarity~\cite{Tadashi2009}. Considering these factors we first propose a new indexing measure $I_{C_{l}}(R_{i},R_{k})$ between two typical elements $R_{i}$, $R_{k}$ for $i,k=1,2,\ldots,m,$ $l=1,2,\ldots,n-1$ belonging to the column $C_{l}$ of \emph{S} which can be applied on any type of data, be it categorical (nominal) and/or numeric (real or integer). We consider the following cases:
\begin{description}
\item[Case I:]~$A_{in}=A_{kn}$ \\
Let \emph{A} denote the collection of all members of \emph{S} that belong to the same decision class to which $R_{i}$ and $R_{k}$ belong and does not have MV. Based on the type of the attribute to which the column $C_{l}$ belongs, the following situations arise:\\
\begin{itemize}
\item [(i)] Elements of the column $C_{l}$ of $S$ are of categorical (nominal) type:\\
\noindent We now express \emph{A} as a disjoint union of non-empty subsets of \emph{A}, say $B_{\gamma_{p_{1}}},B_{\gamma_{p_{2}}},\ldots,B_{\gamma_{p_{s}}}$ obtained in such a manner that every element of \emph{A} belongs to one of these subsets and no element of \emph{A} is a member of more than one subset of \emph{A}. That is $\emph{A}=B_{\gamma_{p_{1}}}\bigcup B_{\gamma_{p_{2}}}\bigcup, \ldots,\bigcup B_{\gamma_{p_{s}}}$, in which $\gamma_{p_{1}}, \gamma_{p_{2}}, \ldots, \gamma_{p_{s}}$ denote the cardinalities of the respective subsets $B_{\gamma_{p_{1}}},B_{\gamma_{p_{2}}},\ldots,B_{\gamma_{p_{s}}}$ formed out of the set \emph{A}, with the property that each member of the same subset has the same first co-ordinate and members of no two different subsets have the same first co-ordinate. We define an index
\begin{eqnarray*}
I_{C_{l}}(R_{i},R_{k})=\left\{
\begin{array}{ll}
\min\{\frac{\gamma_{p_{i}}}{\gamma_{q_{k}}},\frac{\gamma_{q_{k}}}{\gamma_{p_{i}}}\}, & \hbox{for $i \neq k$;} \\
0, & \hbox{otherwise.}
\end{array}
\right.
\end{eqnarray*}
\noindent where $\gamma_{p_{i}}$ represents the cardinality of the subset $B_{\gamma_{p_{i}}}$, all of whose elements have first co-ordinates $A_{il}$ and $\gamma_{q_{k}}$ represents the cardinality of that subset $B_{\gamma_{q_{k}}}$, all of whose elements have first co-ordinates $A_{kl}$.
\\
\item [(ii)] Elements of the column $C_{l}$ of S are of numeric type:\\
\noindent Numeric types can be classified further as integers (whole numbers) or real (fractional numbers). If the attribute is of integer type then we follow the procedure discussed in Case I item (i). For fractional numbers we construct the index $I_{C_{l}}(R_{i},R_{k})$, based on the ratio of the values of the elements $A_{il},A_{kl}$ of $l^{th}$ column to the mean of the set of elements belonging to \emph{A} that do not have MV and is given by
\begin{eqnarray*}
I_{C_{l}}(R_{i},R_{k})=\left\{
\begin{array}{ll}
\min\{\frac{A_{il}}{A^{\#}},\frac{A_{kl}}{A^{\#}}\}, & \hbox{for $i \neq k$;} \\
0, & \hbox{otherwise.}
\end{array}
\right.
\end{eqnarray*}
\noindent In the above definition $A^{\#}$ denotes the average of the $l^{th}$ column entries of all the elements of the set \emph{A} excluding those with MV in the $l^{th}$ column.
\end{itemize}
\item [Case II:]~$A_{in}\neq A_{kn}$ \\
Clearly $R_{i}$ and $R_{k}$ belong to two different decision classes. Consider the subsets $P_{i}$ and $Q_{k}$ consisting of members of \emph{S} that share the same decision with $R_{i}$ and $R_{k}$ respectively and does not have MV. Clearly $P_{i}\bigcap Q_{k} = \emptyset$. Based on the type of the attribute to which the column $C_{l}$ belongs, the following situations arise:\\
\begin{itemize}
\item[(i)] Elements of the column $C_{l}$ of S are of nominal or categorical type:\\
\noindent Following the procedure discussed in Case I item (i) we write \emph{P} and \emph{Q} as a disjoint union of non-empty subsets of $P_{\beta_{1}},P_{\beta_{2}},\ldots,P_{\beta_{r}}$ and $Q_{\delta_{1}},Q_{\delta_{2}},\ldots,Q_{\delta_{s}}$ respectively in which $\beta_{1}, \beta_{2}, \ldots, \beta_{r}$ and $\delta_{1}, \delta_{2}, \ldots, \delta_{s}$ indicate the cardinalities of the respective subsets. We define the indexing measure between the two records $R_{i}$ and $R_{k}$ as
\begin{eqnarray*}
I_{C_{l}}(R_{i},R_{k})=\left\{
\begin{array}{ll}
\max\{\frac{\beta_{r}}{\delta_{s}},\frac{\delta_{s}}{\beta_{r}}\}, & \hbox{for $i \neq k$;} \\
0, & \hbox{otherwise.}
\end{array}
\right.
\end{eqnarray*}
where $\beta_{r}$ represents the cardinality of the subset $P_{\beta_{r}}$ all of whose elements have first co-ordinates $A_{il}$ in set $P$ and $\delta_{s}$ represents the cardinality of that subset $Q_{\delta_{s}}$, all of whose elements have first co-ordinates $A_{kl}$ in set $Q$.
\\
\item[(ii)] Elements of the column $C_{l}$ of S are of numeric type:\\
\noindent If the type of the attribute is integer we follow the procedure discussed in Case II item (i). For fractional numbers we define the index $I_{C_{l}}(R_{i},R_{k})$ between the two records $R_{i} and R_{k}$ as
\begin{eqnarray*}
I_{C_{l}}(R_{i},R_{k})=\left\{
\begin{array}{ll}
\max\{\frac{A_{il}}{\Lambda},\frac{A_{kl}}{\Lambda}\}, & \hbox{for $i \neq k$;} \\
0, & \hbox{otherwise.}
\end{array}
\right.
\end{eqnarray*}
\noindent In the above definition $\Lambda=\min\{P^{\#} ,Q^{\#}\}$ where $P^{\#},$ and $Q^{\#}$ denote the average of the first column entries of all the elements of the sets $\emph{ P}$ and $\emph{Q}$ excluding those with MV in the $l^{th}$ column.
\end{itemize}
\end{description}
The proximity or distance scores between the clinical records in the data set $S$ can be represented as $D=\{\{0,d_{12},\ldots,d_{1m}\};\{d_{21},0,\ldots,d_{2m}\};\ldots;\{d_{m1},d_{m2},\ldots,0\}\}$ where $d_{ik}=\sqrt{\sum_{l=1}^{n-1}I_{C_{l}}^{2}(R_{i},R_{k})}$. For each of the missing value instances in a record $R_{i}$ our imputation procedure first computes the score $z(d_{ij})=\frac{(d_{ij}-\overline{d})}{\sqrt{ \frac{1}{m-1} \sum_{i=1}^{m}(d_{ij}-\overline{d})}}$ where $j=1,2\ldots,m$ and $\overline{d}$ denotes the mean distance. We then pick up only those records (nearest neighbors) which satisfy the condition $z(d_{ij}) \leq 0$ where $\{d_{i1},d_{i2},\ldots,d_{im} \}$ denote the distances of the current record $R_{i}$ to all other records in the data set $S$. If the type of attribute is categorical or integer, then the data value that has the highest frequency (mode) of occurrence in the corresponding columns of the nearest records is imputed. For the data values of type real we impute the mean of data values in the corresponding columns of the nearest records.
\textbf{Illustrative example:} The following example illustrates the spirit of the new imputation algorithm. Consider a data set represented by the matrix $S$ consisting of rows $R_{1}$=(?, 12.0, positive), $R_{2}$=( yes, 10.5, positive), $R_{3}$=( no, 14.0, positive) and $R_{4}$=(no, 13.0, negative). The missing value instance ('?') in this data set is present in record $R_{1}$ and column $C_{1}$. These rows correspond to the data records of four individuals. Clearly the Case I item (i) of the imputation algorithm applies to this data set for determining the missing value. The matrix of the indexing measure $I$ has the following rows: (0,0.86) and (0,0.99) in which $\gamma_{p}=0,$ $\gamma_{q}=1$ and $A^{\#}=12.17$. The relative distances between $R_{1}$ and the other records are computed as $\{0.93,0,0\}$ and the corresponding z-scores are obtained as $\{-0.57,-0.57,1.154\}$. Since z $\le$ 0 for the distances between $R_{1}$ and $R_{2}$ and also $R_{1}$ and $R_{3}$, we conclude that the records $R_{2}$ and $R_{3}$ are nearer to $R_{1}$ and hence the highest frequency (mode) of the data value in column $C_{1}$ is 'yes'. Accordingly this value is a suitable candidate for imputation.
\subsection{Identification of influential features}
\label{FS}
In situations presented by real world processes, influential features are often unknown \emph{a priori}, hence features that are redundant or those that are weakly participating in decision making must be identified and appropriately handled. The features selection procedures can be categorized as random or sequential. The sequential methods such as forward selection, backward elimination and bidirectional selection employ greedy methods and hence may not often be successful in finding the optimal features subsets. In contrast to this stochastic optimization methods such as genetic algorithms (GAs) perform global search and are capable of effectively exploring large search spaces~\cite{Goldberg1989}. In our approach we adopt a wrapper subset based feature evaluation model~\cite{Ron1997} where the method of classification itself is used to measure the importance of the features sub set identified by the GA.
\subsection{Predictive modeling using decision trees}
An alternating decision tree (ADT) consists of decision nodes (splitter node) and prediction nodes which can either be an interior node or a leaf node. The tree generates a prediction node at the root and then alternates between decision nodes and further prediction nodes. Decision nodes specify a predicate condition and prediction nodes contain a single number denoting the predictive value. An instance can be classified by following all paths for which all decision nodes are true and summing the relevant prediction nodes that are traversed. A positive sum implies membership of one class and the negative sum indicates the membership of the opposite class.
\section{Performance evaluation methods}
\label{evalmethods}
The standard definitions of the performance measures such as the specificity (SP), sensitivity (SE), receiver operator characteristics (ROC) and area under ROC (AUC) based on number of true positives, true negatives, false positives and false negatives are utilized in our experimental analysis.
We employed a stratified $k$-fold cross validation for estimating the test error on classification algorithms. We have randomly divided the given data set into $k$ disjoint subsets. Each subset is roughly of equal size and has the same class proportions as in the original data set. The classification model has been built by setting aside one of the subsets as test data set and train the classifier using the other nine subsets. The trained model is then employed in classifying the test data set. The experiment is repeated by setting aside each of the $k$ subsets as test data sets one at a time.
To compute ROC for $k$ folds we first train a classifier using the training data set of a $k$ fold and then obtain the scores in terms of the predicted probabilities for positives and negatives from the trained classifier using the test data set corresponding to the same fold as the training data. Once all the probabilities and corresponding actual decisions are collected, the ROC is obtained by first computing the thresholds using the quartiles of the cumulative predictive probabilities of all the $k$ folds. For each threshold value the measures SE and SP are computed. The false positive rate and true positive rate values of the ROC is taken as (1-SP) and SE respectively. The AUC is computed by applying a trapezoidal rule on the data points of the ROC curve. The optimal cut off or operating point is the threshold that is closest point to (0,1) on the ROC curve which gives the equal error rate. The optimal values of AUC, SE, SP are computed for this cut off point.
\begin{algorithm}[!t]\scriptsize
\caption{The NM Methodology}
\label{chap9:NM}
\begin{algorithmic}
\Require
\begin{enumerate}[label=(\alph{*})]
\item Data sets for the purpose of decision making $S(m,n)$ where $m$ and $n$ are number of records and attributes respectively and the members of $S$ may have MV in any of the attributes except in the decision attribute, which is the last attribute in the record.
\item The type of attribute $C$ of the columns in the data set.
\end{enumerate}
\Ensure
\begin{enumerate}[label=(\alph{*})]
\item Classification accuracy for a given data set $S$.
\item Performance metrics AUC, SE, SP.
\end{enumerate}
\textbf{Algorithm}
\begin{enumerate}[label=(\arabic{*})]
\item Identify and collect all records in a data set $S$
\item Impute the MV in the data set $S$ using the procedure discussed in Section~\ref{chap9:RNI}.
\item Extract the influential features using a wrapper based approach with genetic search for identifying features subsets and alternating decision tree for its evaluation as discussed in Section~\ref{FS}.
\item Split the dataset in to training and testing sets using a stratified $k$ fold cross validation procedure. Denote each training and testing data set by $T_{k}$ and $R_{k}$ respectively.
\item For each $k$ compute the following
\begin{enumerate}[label=(\roman{*})]\label{NMproc}
\item Build the ADT using the records obtained from $T_{k}$. \label{buildadt}
\item Compute the predicted probabilities (scores) for both positive and negative diagnosis of dengue from the ADT built in Step (5)-(i) using the test data set $R_{k}$. Designate the set consisting of all these scores by $P$.
\item Identify and collect the actual diagnosis from the test data set $R_{k}$ in to set denoted by $L$.\label{step3}
\end{enumerate}
\item Repeat the Steps (5)-(i) to Step (5)-(iii) for each fold.
\item Obtain the performance metrics AUC, SE and SP utilizing the sets $L$ and $P$.
\item RETURN AUC, SE, SP.
\item END.
\end{enumerate}
\end{algorithmic}
\end{algorithm}
\section{Experiments and results}
\label{chap8:sec3}
In our methodology we have employed a stratified ten-fold cross validation ( $k=10$) procedure. We applied a standard implementation of SVM with radial basis function kernel~\cite{gomes2010} using LibSVM package~\cite{chang2001}. The GA algorithm for features selection has been performed using the parameter values: cross over probability=$1.0$ and mutation probability=$0.001$. The standard implementation of C4.5, LOR algorithms in Weka$^\copyright$~\cite{Witten2005} are considered for evaluating the performance of our algorithm. We have implemented the NM algorithm and the performance evaluation methods in Matlab$^\copyright$. A non-parametric statistical test proposed by Wilcoxon~\cite{Wilcoxon1945} is used to compare the performances of the algorithms. We compared the NM with the state-of-the-art methodologies employed in diagnosis of dengue fever using different performance measures discussed in Section~\ref{evalmethods}.
\subsection{Data sets}
We have obtained four surveillance data sets from case-patients admitted into hospitals located in central and western States of India. Standard procedures were adopted in collecting the clinical and demographic attributes of the patients. The probable cases of the dengue fever are arrived through definitive laboratory tests such as ELISA. The patients records include clinical symptoms: fever, fever duration, headache, retro-orbital pain (eye pain), myalgia (body pain), arthralgia (joint pain), nausea or vomiting, bleeding gums, rash, bleeding sites, restlessness and abdominal pain and laboratory features: haemoglobin (Hb), white blood cell count (WBC), packed cell volume (PCV) and platelets. The last attribute in data set is the decision attribute. The clinical records are then re-grouped into four data sets. The first data set (DS1) comprises of $646$ adults (age$\geq$ $16$ years) with clinical symptoms and laboratory features out of which $256$ were dengue positive and $390$ are dengue negative. The second data set (DS2) is a part of DS1 consisting of only clinical symptoms (ignoring the laboratory features) and has the same number of records as in DS1. The third data set (DS3) consists of $398$ children (age between $5-15$ years)~\cite{ramos2009} with clinical symptoms and laboratory features, out of which $93$ were dengue positive and $305$ were dengue negative. The fourth data set (DS4) is a part of DS3 with only clinical symptoms and has same number of records as DS3.
\subsection{Results}
The performance of the NM is compared with other methodologies (C4.5, SVM and LOR) on the data sets used in the present study and the classification accuracies are presented in Table~\ref{chap8:tab1}. A hundred percent accuracy is reported by NM both in data sets DS1 and DS3.
\begin{table}[!t]\scriptsize
\centering
\caption{Performance comparison of the NM with other methodologies (C4.5, SVM and LOR) on the data sets used in the present study}
\label{chap8:tab1}
\begin{tabular}{c||c||c||c||c||c}
\hline
\bf{Dataset}&\bf{Method}&\bf{Accuracy}&\bf{SE}&\bf{SP}&\bf{AUC} \\
&&(\%)&&&\\
\hline \hline
\multirow{6}{*}{DS1}&\bf NM&\bf 100.00&\bf 100.00&\bf 100.00&\bf 1.00\\
&C4.5& 96.44& 95.90& 97.27& 1.00\\
&LOR& 91.02& 89.49& 93.36& 0.96\\
&SVM& 96.75& 97.18& 96.09& 0.97\\
\hline
\multirow{6}{*}{DS2}&\bf NM&\bf 86.53&\bf 88.97&\bf 82.81& \bf 0.93\\
&C4.5& 82.35& 87.18& 75.00& 0.84\\
&LOR& 72.91& 74.36& 70.70& 0.78\\
&SVM& 78.17& 89.49& 60.94& 0.75\\
\hline
\multirow{6}{*}{DS3}&\bf NM&\bf 100.00&\bf 100.00&\bf 100.00&\bf 1.00\\
&C4.5& 94.97& 95.41& 93.55& 0.99\\
&LOR& 92.71& 92.79& 92.47& 0.96\\
&SVM& 98.99& 98.69&100.00& 0.99\\
\hline
\multirow{6}{*}{DS4}&\bf NM&\bf 95.48&\bf 98.03&\bf 87.10&\bf 0.95\\
&C4.5& 90.20& 91.48& 86.02& 0.91\\
&LOR& 88.44& 89.84& 83.87& 0.90\\
&SVM& 92.71& 98.03& 75.27& 0.87\\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\end{table}
The Wilcoxon matched-pairs rank sum test results comparing the accuracies of NM with other methodologies are shown in Table~\ref{chap8:tab2}. For example, the positive rank sum of $55.0$ and negative rank sum of $0.0$ with a p-value$<0.01$ for C4.5 using data set DS1 (first row Table~\ref{chap8:tab2}) indicates the superior performance of the new methodology over C4.5 and also in respect of other methods as well.
\begin{table}[H]\scriptsize
\centering
\caption{Wilcoxon matched-pairs rank sum test for comparing the performance of NM with other methodologies used in diagnosis of dengue fever} \label{chap8:tab2}
\begin{tabular}{c||c||c||c}
\hline
\bfseries Dataset&\bfseries Method&\bfseries Rank sum(+, -)&\bfseries p-value\\ \hline \hline
\multirow{5}{*}{DS1} & C4.5&55.0, 0.0&0.002\\
&LOR&55.0, 0.0&0.002\\
&SVM&45.0, 0.0&0.004\\
\hline
\multirow{5}{*}{DS2} & C4.5&55.0, 0.0&0.002\\
&LOR&55.0, 0.0&0.002\\
&SVM&55.0, 0.0&0.002\\
\hline
\multirow{5}{*}{DS3} & C4.5&36.0, 0.0&0.008\\
&LOR&36.0, 0.0&0.008\\
&SVM&10.0, 0.0&0.125\\
\hline
\multirow{5}{*}{DS4} & C4.5&38.5, 6.5&0.074\\
&LOR&37.0, 8.0&0.098\\
&SVM&27.0, 9.0&0.25\\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\end{table}
The above comparisons and statistical tests clearly demonstrate the significance of our methodology in identifying the suspected dengue both in children and adults. The imputation strategy employed in our methodology has improved the classification accuracies when compared with C4.5 which uses a modified information gain measure to generate the decision tree in presence of MV. The mean imputation strategies adopted in SVM and LOR could not render classification accuracies higher than NM.
The features subsets identified by the NM is shown in Table~\ref{chap8:tab3}. The application of features selection method reduced the number of attributes by $75\%$ in DS1 and $87.5\%$ in DS3 data sets. Our methodology identified some of the clinical symptoms and laboratory features in adults (vomiting and abdominal pain) different from those in children which are in concurrence with earlier studies~\cite{Enid2003,Ole2004}. The clinical attribute rash was identified as an important feature in adults but not in children. This may be explained by the relative frequency of the secondary infections in adults~\cite{Cobra1995}. Arthralgia was found to be influencing the final diagnosis of dengue both in children and adults.
\begin{table}[!t]\scriptsize
\centering
\caption{Influential features subsets identified by NM} \label{chap8:tab3}
\begin{tabular}{p{0.2in}||c||p{0.5in}||c||p{1.2in}}
\hline
\bf{Data set} & \bf{\# Orignal}&\bf{\# influential features}&\bf{Accuracy}&\bf{features} \\
&\bf{features}&&\bf{(\%)}& \bf{identified}\\
\hline \hline
DS1&16&5&100.00&retro-orbital pain , arthralgia, fever duration, platelet, fever\\ \hline
DS2&9&6&86.53&vomiting or nausea, myalgia, rash, bleeding sites, abdominal pain, arthralgia\\ \hline
DS3&16&2&100.00&Hb, fever\\ \hline
DS4&9&2&95.48&retro-orbital pain, arthralgia\\ \hline
\end{tabular}
\end{table}
The ROC curves comparing the performance of NM with other methodologies are shown in Figs.~\ref{chap8:fig2}-\ref{chap8:fig5}. The operating point or cut off point ($p<0.001$) is shown as a pentagon on each of the ROC curves. The ROC curves clearly demonstrate the superior performance of NM over other methods used in the diagnosis of dengue.
\begin{figure*}[!t]
\hspace*{1\baselineskip}
\centerline{\subfloat[DS1]{\includegraphics[width=0.32\textwidth]{DS1-ROC.jpg}
\label{chap8:fig2}}
\hspace*{-2\baselineskip}
\subfloat[DS2]{\includegraphics[width=0.32\textwidth]{DS2-ROC.jpg}
\label{chap8:fig3}}
\hspace*{-2\baselineskip}
\subfloat[DS3]{\includegraphics[width=0.32\textwidth]{DS3-ROC.jpg}
\label{chap8:fig4}}
\hspace*{-2\baselineskip}
\subfloat[DS4]{\includegraphics[width=0.32\textwidth]{DS4-ROC.jpg}
\label{chap8:fig5}}}
\caption{ROC curves}
\label{fig_sim}
\end{figure*}
\section{Performance comparison of new imputation algorithm with bench marking data sets}
\label{perMV}
Since no specific studies on imputation of missing values in dengue data sets we have utilized some bench marking data sets obtained from Keel and University of California Irvin (UCI) machine learning data repositories~\cite{Alcala-Fdez2010,Frank2010} to test the performance of the new imputation algorithm. The Wilcoxon statistics in Table~\ref{chap8:tab5} is computed based on the accuracies obtained by the new imputation algorithm with the accuracies of those obtained by other imputation algorithms using a C4.5 decision tree. The results in Table~\ref{chap8:tab5} clearly demonstrate the fact that our algorithm is superior to other imputation algorithms as the positive rank sums are higher than the negative rank sums ($p<0.05$) in all the cases.
\begin{table}[H]\scriptsize
\caption{Wilcoxon sign rank statistics for matched pairs comparing the new imputation algorithm with other imputation methods using C4.5 decision tree}
\label {chap8:tab5}
\centering
\begin{tabular}{l||c||c||c||c}
\hline
\bfseries Method & \bfseries Rank Sums &\bfseries Test& \bfseries Critical& \bfseries p-value \\
& \bfseries (+, -)&\bfseries Statistics&\bfseries Value&\\
\hline \hline
FKMI & 78.5, 12.5& 12.5& 18 &0.021\\ \hline
KMI &85.0, 6.0 &6 &18 &0.003\\ \hline
KNNI & 76.0, 15.0& 15& 18 &0.032\\ \hline
WKNNI & 83.0, 8.0 &8 &18 &0.006\\ \hline
\end{tabular}
\end{table}
\section{Computational complexity}
\label{chap8:sec4}
The computational complexity is a measure of the performance of the algorithm. For each data set having $n$ attributes and $m$ records, we select only those subset of records $m_{1} \le m$, in which missing values are present. The distances are computed for all attributes $n$ excluding the decision attribute. So, the time complexity for computing the distance would be $O(m_{1}*(n-1))$. The time complexity for selecting the nearest records is of order $O(m_{1})$. For computing the frequency of occurrences for nominal attributes and average for numeric attributes the time taken would be of the order $O(m_{1})$. Therefore, for a given data set with $k$-fold cross validation having $n$ attributes and $m$ records, the time complexity of our new imputation algorithm would be $k*(O(m_{1}*(n-1)*m)+2*O(m_{1}))$ which is asymptotically linear. Our experiments were conducted on a personal computer having a Intel(R) core (TM) 2 Duo, CPU @$2.93$ GHZ processor with $4$ GB RAM. For each data set the computational time for imputation and features selection is measured in terms of the number of CPU clock cycles elapsed in seconds. Based on the results, we obtain a scatter plot (red line in Fig.~\ref{chap8:fig6}) between the varying database sizes and the time taken by NM. Also, we employed a linear regression on our results and obtained the relation between the time taken (T) and the data size (D) as $T=0.96D+5.54$, $\alpha=0.05$, $p<0.05$, $r^2=0.98$. The presence of the linear trend between the time taken and the varying database sizes ensures the numerical scalability of the performance of NM in terms of asymptotic linearity.
\begin{figure}[!t]
\centering
\includegraphics[width=0.35\textwidth]{timecomplexity-new.jpg}\\
\caption{Computational complexity of the NM}\label{chap8:fig6}
\end{figure}
\section{Comparison of related methodologies on dengue studies}
\label{chap8:sec5}
In this section we compare the results (Table~\ref{chap8:tab4}) obtained in~\cite{Tanner2008,ramos2009,Chadwick2006} with the results of our new methodology on the current data set of $1044$ individuals including children and adults. As compared to~\cite{ramos2009} where children with rash were having SE of $41.2\%$ and SP of $95.5\%$ our methodology when applied on the data set DS2 resulted in an accuracy of $86.53\%$, SE of $88.97\%$ and SP of $82.81\%$ which is considered to be a good classification model as both SE and SP are higher than $80\%$. In~\cite{Tanner2008} both clinical and laboratory features were utilized to develop decision rules using C4.5 decision tree and they have reported a SE of $87.8\%$ and SP of $75.7\%$. In comparison to~\cite{Tanner2008} our methodology when applied on DS1 and DS3 had resulted in SE of $100\%$ and SP of $100\%$.
\begin{table}[!t]\scriptsize
\centering
\caption{Evaluation of NM with other related methodologies on dengue studies} \label{chap8:tab4}
\begin{tabular}{p{0.6in}||p{0.3in}||p{0.3in}||p{0.3in}||p{0.3in}||p{0.2in}||p{0.2in}}
\hline
\bfseries{State-of-the-art}&\bfseries{\#Patients (DF)}&\bfseries{Records with MV}&\bfseries{Methods}&\bfseries{Accuracy (\%)}&\bfseries{SE (\%)}&\bfseries{SP (\%)}\\
\hline \hline
Chadwick et al.,~\cite{Chadwick2006} (clinical)&381 (148)&deleted&LOR, OR&$84.5$&$84$&$85$ \\ \hline
Chadwick et al.,~\cite{Chadwick2006} (laboratory)&381 (148)&deleted&-do-&$76.5$&$74$&$79$ \\ \hline
Ramos et al.,~\cite{ramos2009} (clinical, children)&938 (38)&manual update&-do-&$68.95$&$41.2$&$95.5$ \\ \hline
Tanner et al.,~\cite{Tanner2008} (laboratory)&1200 (173)&deleted&C4.5&$81.75$&$87.8$&$75.7$\\ \hline
Gomes et al.,~\cite{gomes2010} (gene database)&20 (15)&-&SVM&$85$&-&- \\ \hline
NM (DS1) (adults, clinical \& laboratory) &1044 (256)&imputed (new algorithm)&ADT, GA &$100$&$100$&$100$ \\ \hline
NM (DS2) (adults, clinical) &1044 (256)&-do-&-do- &$86.53$&$88.97$&$82.81$ \\ \hline
NM (DS3) (children, clinical \& laboratory) &1044 (93)&-do-&-do-&$100$&$100$&$100$ \\ \hline
NM (DS4) (children, clinical) &1044 (305)&-do-&-do-&$95.48$&$98.03$&$87.10$ \\ \hline
\end{tabular}
\end{table}
From these comparisons we conclude that the new methodology presented in this study if applied on the data sets used in~\cite{Tanner2008,ramos2009,Chadwick2006} would yield more accurate results.
\section{Conclusions and discussion}
\label{chap8:sec6}
A new methodology (NM) with built in features for imputation of missing values and identification of influential attributes is discussed. The NM has out performed the state-of-the-art methodologies in diagnosis of dengue fever on all the four data sets considered in our experiments. The NM has generated a decision tree with an accuracy of $100.0\%$ in children and adults using both clinical and laboratory features. Based on the performance measures we conclude that the use of the new imputation strategy and features selection methods with wrapper based subset evaluation using genetic search has improved the accuracies of the predictions. Though the new methodology discussed in this paper may be taken as a universal tool for the effective diagnosis of this disease, it remains to be seen whether or not this methodology is geographically independent. However, we are willing to share our predictive methodologies and strategies with the researchers working on dengue fever all over the globe. We hold the view that more intensive and introspective studies of this kind will pave way for better clinical management and virological surveillance of dengue fever.
\section*{Acknowledgments}
We thank the Associate Editor and the anonymous reviewers for their constructive suggestions on our paper. This research is supported by the Foundation for Scientific Research and Technological Innovation (FSRTI)- A Constituent Division of Sri Vadrevu Seshagiri Rao Memorial Charitable Trust, Hyderabad - 500 035, India.
\bibliographystyle{IEEETran}
|
\section{Introduction}
Neurons communicate with each other through the neurotransmitter
diffusion initiated by action potentials, or \textit{spikes}, and
the activity of one neuron can excite or inhibit the activity of
another neurons. The firing rates of spike trains are thought to
carry information and correlations between the firing rates of
neurons depend on the strength of the couplings between those neurons.
With some specific settings of couplings (e.g., Mexican-hat
couplings \citep{Amari1977,Ben-Yishai1995}) networks of neurons can
support a continuous family of local neuronal activity profiles on a
field, which can be used to represent continuous information, such as
object position, object orientation and direction of object motion.
Local neuronal activities associated with continuous information
are observed in various brain regions. Typical examples of cells
showing such activity are head-direction cells
\citep{Taube1990,Blair1995,Zhang1996,Taube1998}, place cells
\citep{OKeefe1971,OKeefe1976,OKeefe1996,Samsonovich1997} and
moving-direction cells \citep{Maunsell1983,Treue2000}.
These cells have Gaussian-like tuning curves as functions of stimulus.
Among the numerous models proposed to describe behaviors of these
systems are continuous attractor neural networks (CANNs), and a recent
study of persistent activity in monkey prefrontal cortices has provided
evidence of continuous attractors in the central nervous system.
\citep{Wimmer2014}. Persistent neuronal activity in monkeys'
prefrontal cortices was discovered during delayed-response
tasks \citep{Funahashi1993}. The study by \citet{Wimmer2014}
confirmed that pairwise neuronal correlation predicted by
theories can be observed in the brain region they investigated
\citep[][]{Ben-Yishai1995,Pouget1998,Wu2008}.
A one-dimensional (1D) CANN can support a family of Gaussian-like
neuronal activity profiles. They are attractors of the network. As
shown in Figure \ref{fig:canns}(a), attractors have the same shapes
and are centered at positions corresponding to different preferred stimuli.
These Gaussian-like profiles can shift smoothly along the space of
attractors. Families of attractor profiles in two-dimensional (2D)
CANNs are similar: each attractor profile is a Gaussian-like profile
and centered at a particular position in the 2D field
(Figure \ref{fig:canns}(b)). The dynamics of a network state profile
to track a stimulus is widely studied in the literature
\citep{Ben-Yishai1995,Samsonovich1997,Wu2008,Fung2010}. If couplings
between neurons are static over time (quenched), the steady state of
neuronal activity profiles will be static because of the homogeneity and
translational invariance of CANNs. If they depend on the firing
histories of presynaptic neurons, however, the dynamics of CANNs can
be different.
\begin{figure}
\begin{centering}
\includegraphics[width=1\textwidth]{NECO-06-014-2141_Figure. 01}\protect\caption{\label{fig:canns}
Examples of attractor states of continuous attractor
neural networks (CANNs) in (a) a 1D field and (b) a 2D field.
In (a), profiles are centered at location $z$, the
location they are representing. In (b), $x_{0}$ is the first
coordinate of the preferred stimulus and $x_{1}$ is the second
coordinate of the preferred stimulus.}
\par\end{centering}
\end{figure}
\citet{Tsodyks1997} proposed a model in which the synaptic
efficacies between neurons depend on the amount of available
neurotransmitters in the presynaptic neurons and this amount
depends on the firing history of the presynaptic neuron
\citep{Tsodyks1997,Tsodyks1998}. This kind of reduction
in synaptic efficacies, due to past presynaptic neuronal activity, is
called short-term synaptic depression (STD). There are reports that
short-term synaptic depression can exhibit rich dynamics in CANNs
\citep{York2009,Fung2012a}. \citet{Fung2012a} reported that in
1D CANNs, short-term synaptic depression can destabilize attractor
profiles. Within a broad range of strengths of divisive
global inhibition, if we increase the degree of STD to a moderate
range, static activity profiles will be translationally destabilized.
After some translational perturbations, a bump-shaped profile
can move spontaneously along the attractor space. In these scenarios,
both bump-shaped static states and moving states can coexist.
If we further increase the degree of STD, no static profile can be
found. If the degree of STD is too large, the steady state of the
system can only be a trivial solution. Similar behavior is reported
by \citet{York2009} with a different model. We can see that the
instability induced by STD can reshape the intrinsic dynamics
of the system, even when no stimulus is presented.
Network response in a CANN with static couplings is always lagging
behind a continuously moving stimulus. However, with short-term
synaptic depression, due to the translational instability, the
underlying dynamics of the network can make the response to over-take
the actual stimulus. \citet{Fung2012b} suggested that this behavior
can be used to implement a delay compensation mechanism. Short-term
synaptic depression can also induce global \citep{Leobel2002} and local
\citep{Fung2013,Wang2014} periodic excitements of neuronal activity
profiles. These periodic excitements can enhance information processing
in the brain. \citet{Fung2013} recently proposed that periodic excitement
driven by the intrinsic dynamics can improve the resolution of CANNs.
\citet{Kilpatrick2012} also proposed that the neuronal activity pattern
may shift between one stimulus and another. These theories suggested
that STD may enhance the capability of CANNs.
Studies on CANNs with short-term synaptic depression are mainly on
1D networks. In this paper, we discuss the intrinsic dynamics
of bump-shaped solutions of two-dimensional CANNs with short-term
synaptic depression. Other 2D models possess rich dynamical behaviors
such as spiral waves \citep{Kilpatrick2010}, breathing pulses
\citep{Kilpatrick2010} and collisions of two bump-shaped profiles
\citep{Lu2011}. Here, we focus on the spontaneous motion of a single
bump-shaped profile, and analyze its stability. We have also studied
the influence of STD on the sizes of bump-shaped profiles and on their
changes in shape.
We study not only CANNs with STD, but also CANNs with spike frequency
adaptation. Spike frequency adaptation (SFA) is a dynamical feature
commonly observed in neurons. Neurons are suppressed after prolonged
firing. SFA can be generated by a number of mechanisms
\citep{Brown1980,Madison1984,Fleidervish1996,Benda2003}.
It can also destabilize the amplitudes and positions of static bumps.
SFA-induced destabilization of bump-shaped states in CANNs are reported
in the literature \citep[e.g.,][]{Kilpatrick2010b}.
What we find in our study on CANNs with SFA is similar to what we
found in the case with STD. SFA first destabilizes the translational
mode and then the amplitudal mode. There is also a parameter region
such that both spontaneous-moving-bump solutions and static-bump
solutions can coexist.
In this paper, in each case, CANNs with STD and CANNs with SFA,
we first introduce the model we used to study the problem and then
analyze each scenario using the perturbative method proposed by
\cite{Fung2010}. These sections are followed by a section discussing
the comparison between theoretical and simulation results and
discussing the limitations of the perturbative method.
\section{The Model}
In this work we consider a 2D neural field, where neurons are located
on a 2D field with positional coordinates $\mathbf{x}=\left(x_{0},x_{1}\right)$.
$\mathbf{x}$ can be interpreted as the preferred stimulus
of the neuron sitting at that point in the 2D field.
The state of a neural field is specified by the average membrane potential
$u\left(\mathbf{x},t\right)$ of neurons at $\mathbf{x}$ at time $t$.
The neuronal activity of a neuron at $\mathbf{x}$ is given by a nonlinear
function of $u\left(\mathbf{x},t\right)$:
\begin{equation}
r\left(\mathbf{x},t\right)=\frac{u\left(\mathbf{x},t\right)^{2}}{B\left(t\right)}\Theta\left[u\left(\mathbf{x},t\right)\right],\label{eq:r_of_u}
\end{equation}
where $\Theta$ is the Heaviside step function and $B\left(t\right)$ is
the divisive global inhibition. The neuronal activity is related
to the average firing rate of the neuron. The evolution of the
global inhibition is given by
\begin{equation}
\tau_{B}\frac{dB\left(t\right)}{dt}=-B\left(t\right)+1+\rho k\int d\mathbf{x}^{\prime}u\left(\mathbf{x}^{\prime},t\right)^{2}\Theta\left[u\left(\mathbf{x}^\prime,t\right)\right],\label{dBdt}
\end{equation}
where $k$ is the parameter controlling the strength of the divisive global
inhibition and $\rho$ is the density of neurons over the field.
Here, $B\left(t\right)$ is driven by $u\left(\mathbf{x},t\right)^2$.
This choice of driving term can simplify our calculations.
As we will describe in the following, $u\left(\mathbf{x},t\right)$
is a weighted sum of $r\left(\mathbf{x},t\right)$. So $B\left(t\right)$
effectively depends on $r\left(\mathbf{x},t\right)$.
Also, at the steady state, the magnitude of $u\left(\mathbf{x},t\right)$
is directly proportional to that of $r\left(\mathbf{x},t\right)$.
In the network, neurons are connected by excitatory couplings given by
\begin{equation}
J\left(\left|\mathbf{x}-\mathbf{x^{\prime}}\right|\right)=\frac{J_{0}}{2\pi a^{2}}\exp\left(-\frac{\left|\mathbf{x}-\mathbf{x^{\prime}}\right|^{2}}{2a^{2}}\right),\label{eq:Jxx}
\end{equation}
where $\left|~\cdot~\right|$ is the norm of the argument. $a$ is the
radius of effective excitatory connections and $J_{0}$ is the
intensity of average coupling over the field. The dynamics of
$u\left(x,t\right)$ is governed by
\begin{align}
\tau_{s}\frac{\partial u\left(\mathbf{x},t\right)}{\partial t}=&-u\left(\mathbf{x},t\right)+\rho\int d\mathbf{x^{\prime}}J\left(\left|\mathbf{x}-\mathbf{x^{\prime}}\right|\right)p\left(\mathbf{x^{\prime}},t\right)r\left(\mathbf{x^{\prime}},t\right)\nonumber \\&-v\left(\mathbf{x},t\right)+I^{\text{ext}}\left(\mathbf{x},t\right). \label{eq:dudt}
\end{align}
$I^{\text{ext}}\left(\mathbf{x},t\right)$ is the external
stimulus, $p\left(\mathbf{x},t\right)$ is the portion
of available neurotransmitters of the presynaptic neuron and
$v\left(\mathbf{x},t\right)$ is the dynamical variable
corresponding to SFA. Since in this work, we are studying
intrinsic dynamics in the network, $I^{\rm ext}\left(\mathbf{x},t\right)$
is set to zero throughout the paper.
The portion of available neurotransmitters of
the presynaptic neuron at $\mathbf{x}$, $p\left(\mathbf{x},t\right)$,
evolves as
\begin{equation}
\tau_{d}\frac{\partial p\left(\mathbf{x},t\right)}{\partial t}=-p\left(\mathbf{x},t\right)+1-\tau_{d}\beta p\left(\mathbf{x},t\right)r\left(\mathbf{x},t\right).\label{eq:dpdt}
\end{equation}
The first term on the right-hand side of this equation is the relaxation of
$p\left(\mathbf{x},t\right)$ with time constant $\tau_{d}$.
The last term is the consumption rate of neurotransmitters.
$\beta$ is a parameter proportional to the neurotransmitter
consumption due to each spikes. This parameter controls
the strength of STD. On the other hand, the dynamics
of $v\left(\mathbf{x},t\right)$ is given by
\begin{equation}
\tau_{i}\frac{dv}{dt}\left(\mathbf{x},t\right)=-v\left(\mathbf{x},t\right)+\gamma f\left[u\left(\mathbf{x},t\right)\right].\label{eq:dvdt_sub}
\end{equation}
$\tau_{i}$ is the timescale of SFA. $\gamma$ is the degree of SFA.
$f$ is the dependence of SFA variables on average membrane potential,
which is a non-decreasing function. For simplicity, we have chosen
\begin{equation}
f\left(u\right)=u\Theta\left(u\right).\label{eq:f_u2v}
\end{equation}
This choice is convenient for our analytic purpose and should not
affect the main conclusion qualitatively as long as the adaptation
increases with the average membrane potential, $u\left(\mathbf{x},t\right)$,
which is correlated with the average neuronal activity.
In the present study, we analyze CANNs with STD and CANNs with SFA
separately. For the case of CANNs with STD, we set $\gamma=0$. For
CANNs with SFA, we set $\beta=0$.
\section{CANNs with STD}
\subsection{Stationary Solution}
In this case, we set $\gamma=0$ and $I^{\rm ext}\left(\mathbf{x},t\right)=0$
to suppress SFA at the moment. For $\beta=0$, $p\left(\mathbf{x},t\right)=1$,
two types of non-zero fixed point solutions to Eq. (\ref{eq:dudt})
exist when $0<k<k_{c}\equiv\rho J_{0}^{2}/\left(32\pi a\right)$:
\begin{equation}
u\left(\mathbf{x}\right)=u_{00}\exp\left(-\frac{\left|\mathbf{x}-\mathbf{z}\right|^{2}}{4a^{2}}\right),
\end{equation}
where $\rho J_{0}u_{00}=4(1\pm\sqrt{1-k/k_{c}})/(k/k_{c})$ and $\mathbf{z}$
is an arbitrary location in the field representing the center of local
excitation. It is expected that the fixed point solution with the
larger amplitude is stable and the other is unstable. For $\tau_{B}=0$,
consider
\begin{equation}
u\left(\mathbf{x},t\right)=\left[u_{00}+\delta u_{00}\left(t\right)\right]\exp\left(-\frac{\left|\mathbf{x}-\mathbf{z}\right|^{2}}{4a^{2}}\right),\label{eq:u_plus_delta_u}
\end{equation}
where $\delta u_{00}\left(t\right)$ is the deviation of the profile
from the fixed point solution. Then the differential equation of
the deviation is
\begin{equation}
\tau_{s}\frac{d\delta u_{00}\left(t\right)}{dt}=\mp\sqrt{1-\frac{k}{k_{c}}}\delta u_{00}\left(t\right).
\end{equation}
Therefore the smaller fixed point solutions are unstable, while the
larger fixed point solutions have stable amplitudes. For non-zero
$\tau_{B}$, we have to consider the dynamics of $B(t)$. Let $B(t)=B_{0}+\delta B(t)$,
where $B_{0}=1+\tfrac{1}{16}\left(k/k_{c}\right)\left(\rho J_{0}u_{00}\right)^{2}$.
The dynamics of the deviation from the fixed point solution is given
by
\begin{equation}
\tau_{s}\frac{d}{dt}\left(\begin{array}{c}
\rho J_{0}\delta u_{00}\left(t\right)\\
\delta B\left(t\right)
\end{array}\right)=\left(\begin{array}{cc}
1 & -2\\
\frac{1}{2}\frac{\tau_{s}}{\tau_{B}}(1\pm\sqrt{1-\frac{k}{k_{c}}}) & -\frac{\tau_{s}}{\tau_{B}}
\end{array}\right)\left(\begin{array}{c}
\rho J_{0}\delta u_{00}\left(t\right)\\
\delta B\left(t\right)
\end{array}\right).\label{eq:ddelta_u}
\end{equation}
Since the trace of the $2\times2$ matrix in Eq. (\ref{eq:ddelta_u}) is negative
for $\tau_{B}<\tau_{s}$ and the sign of the determinant is independent
of $\tau_{s}/\tau_{B}$, the solution with the larger $u_{00}$ is
stable against perturbations in amplitude, while the solution with the
smaller amplitude is unstable. The solution of $u_{00}$ as a function
of $k/k_{c}$ is shown in Figure \ref{fig:static_no_std}.
\begin{figure}
\begin{centering}
\includegraphics[width=0.8\textwidth]{NECO-06-014-2141_Figure. 02}
\par\end{centering}
\protect\caption{\label{fig:static_no_std} Solution of $\rho J_{0}u_{00}$ as a function
of $k/k_{c}$. For each $k/k_{c}$ less than 1, the larger solution of
$\rho J_{0}u_{00}$ is stable and the smaller solution is unstable.}
\end{figure}
For $\beta>0$ and $I^{\text{ext}}\left(\mathbf{x},t\right)=0$, we
approximate the attractor profiles of $u\left(\mathbf{x},t\right)$
and $1-p(\mathbf{x},t)$ by non-moving Gaussian distributions
\begin{align}
u\left(\mathbf{x},t\right) = &~u_{00}\left(t\right)\exp\left(-\frac{\left|\mathbf{x}\right|^{2}}{4a^{2}}\right),\label{eq:u0}\\
1-p\left(\mathbf{x},t\right) = &~p_{00}\left(t\right)\exp\left(-\frac{\left|\mathbf{x}\right|^{2}}{2a^{2}}\right).\label{eq:p0}
\end{align}
Here, without loss of generality, we consider the case with
$\mathbf{z}=\mathbf{0}$. They are not the exact solutions of Eqs.
(\ref{dBdt}), (\ref{eq:dudt}) and (\ref{eq:dpdt}). In this
ansatz, $u\left(\mathbf{x},t\right)$ is assumed to have the same
shape as that in the $\beta=0$ case. The width of
$1-p\left(\mathbf{x},t\right)$ is different from
$u\left(\mathbf{x},t\right)$ because the shape of
$1-p\left(\mathbf{x},t\right)$ is similar to $u\left(\mathbf{x},t\right)^2$ at the
small $\beta$ limit. The differential equations governing $u_{00}\left(t\right)$
and $p_{00}\left(t\right)$ can be obtained by projecting Eq. (\ref{eq:dudt}) onto
$\exp[-\left|\mathbf{x}\right|^{2}/(4a^{2})]$ and projecting Eq. (\ref{eq:dpdt})
onto $\exp[-\left|\mathbf{x}\right|^{2}/(2a^{2})]$.
As in the study by \citet{Fung2012a}, $u\left(\mathbf{x},t\right)$
can be replaced by rescaled variables $\widetilde{u}\left(\mathbf{x},t\right)\equiv
\rho J_0 u\left(\mathbf{x},t\right)$ because $u_{00}\left(t\right)$
has a dimension $1/(\rho J_{0})$. $\widetilde{u}_{00}\left(t\right)\equiv\rho J_{0}u_{00}\left(t\right)$.
And $k$ and $\beta$ can be rescaled by $\widetilde{k}\equiv k/k_{c}$
and $\widetilde{\beta}\equiv\tau_{d}\beta/(\rho^{2}J_{0}^{2})$.
\begin{figure}
\begin{centering}
\includegraphics[width=0.8\columnwidth]{NECO-06-014-2141_Figure. 03}
\par\end{centering}
\protect\caption{\label{fig:std_parabola} Parameter regions of existence of static
profiles of $u(\mathbf{x},t)$. Dashed curves: parabolas given by
Eq. (\ref{eq:std_parabola}) for different $\widetilde{\beta}B$'s. Solid
line: boundary separating parameter regions of static profiles of $u(\mathbf{x},t)$
and silent phase. }
\end{figure}
With these rescaled variables, the differential equations of
$\widetilde{u}_{00}\left(t\right)$, $p_{00}\left(t\right)$ and
$B\left(t\right)$ are
\begin{align}
\tau_{s}\frac{d\widetilde{u}_{00}}{dt}\left(t\right) = & ~ -\widetilde{u}_{00}\left(t\right)+\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{B\left(t\right)}\widetilde{u}_{00}\left(t\right)^{2}\left[1-\frac{4}{7}p_{00}\left(t\right)\right],\label{eq:du00dt_std}\\
\tau_{d}\frac{dp_{00}}{dt}\left(t\right) = & ~ -p_{00}\left(t\right)+\frac{1}{B\left(t\right)}\widetilde{\beta}\widetilde{u}_{00}\left(t\right)^{2}\left[1-\frac{2}{3}p_{00}\left(t\right)\right],\label{eq:dp00dt_std}\\
\tau_{B}\frac{dB}{dt}\left(t\right) = & ~ -B\left(t\right)+1+\frac{1}{16}\widetilde{k}\widetilde{u}_{00}\left(t\right)^{2}.\label{eq:dBdt_std}
\end{align}
As we study the steady state behavior of the network,
we need to solve for the fixed point solution first.
For the first two differential equations, we may let $\widetilde{\beta}B$
be given. Then we can solve $\widetilde{u}_{00}/B$ and $p_{00}$. For
a given $\widetilde{\beta}B$, $\widetilde{k}$ and $\widetilde{\beta}$
are related by
\begin{equation}
\widetilde{k}=\frac{16}{\left(\frac{\widetilde{u}_{00}}{B}\right)^{2}}\left[-\frac{1}{\left(B\widetilde{\beta}\right)^{2}}\widetilde{\beta}^{2}+\frac{1}{B\widetilde{\beta}}\widetilde{\beta}\right].\label{eq:std_parabola}
\end{equation}
The parabolas given by this equation for different
$\widetilde\beta B$s are plotted as dashed lines
in Figure \ref{fig:std_parabola}, where we see that the static
fixed point solution exists only when
\begin{equation}
\begin{cases}
\widetilde{\beta}\le\frac{3}{16}\widetilde{k}\frac{1-\sqrt{\widetilde{k}}}{\sqrt{\widetilde{k}}-\frac{1}{7}} & \text{, if }\frac{9}{49}\le\widetilde{k}\le1\\
\widetilde{\beta}\le\frac{9}{56}\left(\frac{3}{7}-\sqrt{\frac{9}{49}-\widetilde{k}}\right) & \text{, if }0\le\widetilde{k}\le\frac{9}{49}
\end{cases}.
\end{equation}
By considering the stability of fixed point solutions, we obtain
the solid line in Figure \ref{fig:std_parabola} (also the dotted line
in Figure \ref{fig:phase_diagram_std}).
This curve maps the parameter region for the existence of static
profiles of $u(\mathbf{x},t)$. The methodology for studying
stability of fixed point solutions can be found in
Appendix \ref{subsec:static_std}.
\subsubsection{Translational Instability}
We have simplified Eqs. (\ref{dBdt}), (\ref{eq:dudt}) and (\ref{eq:dpdt})
by introducing the approximation given by Eqs. (\ref{eq:u0}) and
(\ref{eq:p0}). This simplification, however, is useful for studying
only the amplitudal stability of a bump-shaped solution. For the
translational stability, we need to consider the stability of the static
solution against asymmetric distortions.
Displacing originally aligned $u\left(\mathbf{x},t\right)$ and
$p\left(\mathbf{x},t\right)$ profiles of a static solution is
a reasonable test, as the dip of $p\left(\mathbf{x},t\right)$
is generated by activities of neurons. If the solution is moving,
the dip of $p\left(\mathbf{x},t\right)$ is always lagging behind.
As a result, the asymmetric component of $p\left(\mathbf{x},t\right)$
with respect to the center of mass of $u\left(\mathbf{x},t\right)$
becomes non-zero. In the calculation, we may drop asymmetric
components of $u\left(\mathbf{x},t\right)$ for the moment, as we can always
choose a frame such that the major asymmetric mode is zero.
Let us assume
\begin{align}
u\left(\mathbf{x},t\right) = & ~ u_{00}\left(t\right)\exp\left(-\frac{\left|\mathbf{x}\right|^{2}}{4a^{2}}\right),\label{eq:u0_2}\\
p\left(\mathbf{x},t\right) = & ~ p_{00}\left(t\right)\exp\left(-\frac{\left|\mathbf{x}\right|^{2}}{2a^{2}}\right)+p_{10}\left(t\right)\frac{x_{0}}{a}\exp\left(-\frac{\left|\mathbf{x}\right|^{2}}{2a^{2}}\right).\label{eq:p0p1}
\end{align}
Due to the symmetry of the preferred stimulus space, here we consider
only the distortion along the $x_{0}$-direction. By substituting
these two assumptions into Eqs. (\ref{dBdt}), (\ref{eq:dudt}) and
(\ref{eq:dpdt}), we can study the stability of static solutions against
asymmetric distortions. With assumptions Eqs. (\ref{eq:u0_2})
and (\ref{eq:p0p1}), we can derive the stability matrix by calculating
the Jacobian matrix at the fixed point solution. Then the dynamics
of distortions of $\widetilde u_{00}\left(t\right)$,
$p_{00}\left(t\right)$, $p_{10}\left(t\right)$ and $B\left(t\right)$
around the static fixed point solution is given by
\begin{equation}
\tau_s
\frac{d}{dt}
\left(
\begin{array}{c}
\delta\widetilde u_{00}\left(t\right) \\
\delta p_{00}\left(t\right) \\
\delta B \left(t\right) \\
\delta p_{10}\left(t\right)
\end{array}
\right)
=
\left(\begin{array}{cc}
\mathscr{A}_{\rm STD} & 0\\
0 & M
\end{array}\right)
\left(
\begin{array}{c}
\delta\widetilde u_{00}\left(t\right) \\
\delta p_{00}\left(t\right) \\
\delta B \left(t\right) \\
\delta p_{10}\left(t\right)
\end{array}
\right),
\label{eq:trans_std}
\end{equation}
where the $3\times3$ matrix $\mathscr{A}_{\rm STD}$ is provided
in Appendix \ref{subsec:static_std}.
$\mathscr{A}_{\rm STD}$ determines the amplitudal stability of
the solution, while
$M$ determines translational stability, which is given by
\begin{equation}
M = \frac{1}{\tau_{d}}\left(-1+\frac{\widetilde{\beta}}{B}\frac{4}{9}\widetilde{u}_{00}^{2}+\frac{\tau_{d}}{\tau_{s}}\frac{1}{B}\frac{8}{49}\widetilde{u}_{00}\widetilde{p}_{00}\right).
\end{equation}
If $M>0$, the static solution of two-dimensional CANNs with short-term
synaptic depression will obviously be translationally unstable because
positional distortion will diverge.
By studying the stability matrix, we found that bump-shaped solutions
will be translationally stable only if
\begin{equation}
\frac{4}{9}\left(\widetilde{\beta}B\right)\left(\frac{\widetilde{u}_{00}}{B}\right)^{2}+\frac{\tau_{d}}{\tau_{s}}\frac{8}{49}\frac{\widetilde{u}_{00}}{B}p_{00}<1.
\end{equation}
In this case, asymmetric distortions cannot initiate spontaneous motion.
When this inequality does not hold, there will be a moving
solution such that the bump-shaped profile can move spontaneously
with a speed dictated by $\widetilde{k}$, $\widetilde{\beta}$ and
$\tau_{d}/\tau_{s}$. This inequality provides a prediction of the
boundary separating translationally stable static bumps and translationally
unstable static bumps, which is plotted as a solid line in
Figure \ref{fig:phase_diagram_std}.
\begin{figure}
\begin{centering}
\includegraphics[width=0.8\textwidth]{NECO-06-014-2141_Figure. 04}
\par\end{centering}
\begin{centering}
\protect\caption{\label{fig:phase_diagram_std}
Phase diagram of different phases under
this theoretical framework.
Circles: simulation results on translational stability.
Squares: simulation results on amplitude stability.
Triangles: simulation results on stability of moving bumps.
Curves: corresponding theoretical predictions.
Parameter: $\tau_{d}/\tau_{s}=50$.}
\end{centering}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure}
\begin{centering}
\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{NECO-06-014-2141_Figure. 05}\protect
\caption{\label{fig:std_u00}
(a) Measurements and predictions of $\widetilde{u}_{00}/B$.
Symbols: measurements from various $\widetilde{k}$. Curves: different
levels of predictions.
(b) Measurements and predictions of
$\left(\widetilde{u}_{20}+\widetilde{u}_{02}\right)/B$.
Symbols: measurements from various $\widetilde{k}$. Curves: different
levels of predictions.
(c) Measurements and predictions of $\sqrt{\left(\widetilde{u}_{20}-\widetilde{u}_{02}\right)^{2}+\widetilde{u}_{11}^{2}}/B$.
Symbols: measurements from various $\widetilde{k}$. Curves: different
levels of predictions.
(d) Measurements and predictions of the intrinsic moving
speed. Symbols: measurements from various $\widetilde{k}$. Curves: different
levels of predictions.
(a) - (d) Parameters: same as Figure \ref{fig:phase_diagram_std}.
}
\par\end{centering}
\end{figure}
\subsection{Moving Solution}
In the one-dimensional situation, when $\widetilde{k}$ is small and $\widetilde{\beta}$
is relatively large, there may be spontaneous moving solutions \citep{Fung2012a}.
To analyze the moving solution, we need to consider higher-order
expansions of $u\left(\mathbf{x},t\right)$ and $p\left(\mathbf{x},t\right)$.
In general, $u\left(\mathbf{x},t\right)$ and $p\left(\mathbf{x},t\right)$
can be expanded by any basis functions. Here we have chosen eigenstates
of quantum harmonic oscillator as basis functions.
\begin{align}
u\left(\mathbf{x},t\right) = & ~ \sum_{k_{0},k_{1}}u_{k_{0}k_{1}}\left(t\right)\psi_{k_{0}}\left(\xi_{0}\right)\psi_{k_{1}}\left(\xi_{1}\right),\label{eq:uk}\\
1-p\left(\mathbf{x},t\right) = & ~ \sum_{k_{0},k_{1}}p_{k_{0}k_{1}}\left(t\right)\varphi_{k_{0}}\left(\xi_{0}\right)\varphi_{k_{1}}\left(\xi_{1}\right),\label{eq:pk}
\end{align}
where
\begin{align}
\psi_{k}\left(\xi_{i}\right) = & ~ \frac{1}{\sqrt{\sqrt{2\pi}a2^{k}k!}}H_{n}\left(\frac{\xi_{i}}{\sqrt{2}a}\right)\exp\left[-\frac{\xi_{i}^{2}}{4a^{2}}\right],\label{eq:psi_k}\\
\varphi_{k}\left(\xi_{i}\right) = & ~ \frac{1}{\sqrt{\sqrt{\pi}a2^{k}k!}}H_{n}\left(\frac{\xi_{i}}{a}\right)\exp\left[-\frac{\xi_{i}^{2}}{2a^{2}}\right],\; i=0,1.\label{eq:varphi_k}
\end{align}
In these equations,
$\xi_{i}\equiv x_{i}-c_{i}t$. $c_{i}$ is the $i^{\rm th}$-component
of the velocity of the moving frame. $H_{n}$ is the $n^{\text{th}}$
order physicists' Hermite polynomial. As in the
ansatz for static solutions (Eqs. (\ref{eq:u0}) and (\ref{eq:p0})),
the widths of the basis functions for ${u}\left(\mathbf{x},t\right)$
and $p\left(\mathbf{x},t\right)$ are different.
This choice makes the perturbative expansion more efficient,
although the choice of basis functions can be arbitrary.
After substituting Eqs. (\ref{eq:uk})
and (\ref{eq:pk}) into Eqs. (\ref{dBdt}), (\ref{eq:dudt})
and (\ref{eq:dpdt}) and projections on
Eqs. (\ref{eq:psi_k}) and (\ref{eq:varphi_k}), we obtain
\begin{align}
\tau_{s}\frac{d\widetilde{u}_{k_{0}k_{1}}}{dt}\left(t\right) = & ~ -\widetilde{u}_{k_{0}k_{1}}\left(t\right)+\frac{\tau_{s}c_{0}}{2a}\left[\sqrt{k_{0}+1}\widetilde{u}_{k_{0}+1,k_{1}}\left(t\right)-\sqrt{k_{0}}\widetilde{u}_{k_{0}-1,k_{1}}\left(t\right)\right]\nonumber \\
& ~ +\frac{\tau_{s}c_{1}}{2a}\left[\sqrt{k_{1}+1}\widetilde{u}_{k_{0},k_{1}+1}\left(t\right)-\sqrt{k_{1}}\widetilde{u}_{k_{0},k_{1}-1}\left(t\right)\right]\nonumber \\
& ~ +\frac{1}{B\left(t\right)}\sum_{n_{0}n_{1}m_{0}m_{1}}C_{n_{0}m_{0}}^{k_{0}}C_{n_{1}m_{1}}^{k_{1}}\widetilde{u}_{n_{0}n_{1}}\left(t\right)\widetilde{u}_{m_{0}m_{1}}\left(t\right)\nonumber \\
& ~ -\frac{1}{B\left(t\right)}\sum_{n_{0}n_{1}m_{0}m_{1}l_{0}l_{1}}D_{n_{0}m_{0}l_{0}}^{k_{0}}D_{n_{1}m_{1}l_{1}}^{k_{1}}\widetilde{u}_{n_{0}n_{1}}\left(t\right)\widetilde{u}_{m_{0}m_{1}}\left(t\right)p_{l_{0}l_{1}}\left(t\right),\nonumber\\\label{eq:dukkdt}\\
\tau_{d}\frac{dp_{k_{0}k_{1}}}{dt}\left(t\right) = & ~ -p_{k_{0}k_{1}}\left(t\right)+\frac{\tau_{d}c_{0}}{\sqrt{2}a}\left[\sqrt{k_{0}+1}p_{k_{0}+1,k_{1}}\left(t\right)-\sqrt{k_{0}}p_{k_{0}-1,k_{1}}\left(t\right)\right]\nonumber \\
& ~ +\frac{\tau_{d}c_{1}}{\sqrt{2}a}\left[\sqrt{k_{1}+1}p_{k_{0},k_{1}+1}\left(t\right)-\sqrt{k_{1}}p_{k_{0},k_{1}-1}\left(t\right)\right]\nonumber \\
& ~ +\frac{\widetilde{\beta}}{B\left(t\right)}\sum_{n_{0}n_{1}m_{0}m_{1}}E_{n_{0}m_{0}}^{k_{0}}E_{n_{1}m_{1}}^{k_{1}}\widetilde{u}_{n_{0}n_{1}}\left(t\right)\widetilde{u}_{m_{0}m_{1}}\left(t\right)\nonumber \\
&~ -\frac{\widetilde{\beta}}{B\left(t\right)}\sum_{n_{0}n_{1}m_{0}m_{1}}F_{n_{0}m_{0}l_{0}}^{k_{0}}F_{n_{1}m_{1}l_{1}}^{k_{1}}\widetilde{u}_{n_{0}n_{1}}\left(t\right)\widetilde{u}_{m_{0}m_{1}}\left(t\right)p_{l_{0}l_{1}}\left(t\right),\label{eq:dpkkdt}\\
\tau_{B}\frac{dB}{dt}\left(t\right) = & ~ -B\left(t\right)+1+k\rho\sum_{k_{0}k_{1}}\widetilde{u}_{k_{0}k_{1}}\left(t\right)^{2}.\label{eq:dBdt}
\end{align}
A detailed illustration of the derivation of these equations can be found
in Appendix \ref{subsec:moving_sol_std}.
Here, $\widetilde{u}_{k_{0}k_{1}}\left(t\right)$'s are rescaled dynamical variables:
$\widetilde{u}_{k_{0}k_{1}}\left(t\right)\equiv\rho J_{0}u_{k_{0}k_{1}}\left(t\right)$.
Coefficients
$C_{nm}^{k}$, $D_{nml}^{k}$, $E_{nm}^{k}$ and $F_{nml}^{k}$ are
defined by
\begin{align}
C_{nm}^{k} \equiv & ~ \int d\xi\psi_{k}\left(\xi\right)\int d\xi^{\prime}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}a}e^{-\frac{\left(\xi-\xi^{\prime}\right)^{2}}{2a^{2}}}\psi_{n}\left(\xi^{\prime}\right)\psi_{m}\left(\xi^{\prime}\right),\label{eq:std_Cnmk}\\
D_{nml}^{k} \equiv &~ \int d\xi\psi_{k}\left(\xi\right)\int d\xi^{\prime}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}a}e^{-\frac{\left(\xi-\xi^{\prime}\right)^{2}}{2a^{2}}}\psi_{n}\left(\xi^{\prime}\right)\psi_{m}\left(\xi^{\prime}\right)\varphi_{l}\left(\xi^{\prime}\right),\\
E_{nm}^{k} \equiv &~ \int d\xi\varphi_{k}\left(\xi\right)\int d\xi^{\prime}\psi_{n}\left(\xi^{\prime}\right)\psi_{m}\left(\xi^{\prime}\right),\\
F_{nml}^{k} \equiv &~ \int d\xi\varphi_{k}\left(\xi\right)\int d\xi^{\prime}\psi_{n}\left(\xi^{\prime}\right)\psi_{m}\left(\xi^{\prime}\right)\varphi_{l}\left(\xi^{\prime}\right).
\end{align}
$C_{00}^{0}$, $D_{000}^{0}$, $E_{00}^{0}$ and $F_{000}^{0}$ can
be calculated explicitly. For
$C_{nm}^{k}$, $D_{nml}^{k}$, $E_{nm}^{k}$ and $F_{nml}^{k}$
with arbitrary $k$, $n$, $m$ and $l$, the
recurrence relations used to generate these coefficients can be found in
Appendix B in the paper by \citet{Fung2012a}.
In practice, we cannot consider infinitely many
$\widetilde{u}_{k_0k_1}\left(t\right)$ and $p_{k_0k_1}\left(t\right)$. We
used finite terms to obtain fairly acceptable results. In Figures
\ref{fig:phase_diagram_std} and \ref{fig:std_u00},
`$k_0+k_1=3$ Perturbation' means that we consider terms up to
$k_0+k_1=3$.
Unfortunately, the above equations cannot
form a complete set of equations sufficient to solve for the fixed point
solution. We also need to consider the self-consistent condition:
\begin{equation}
\frac{\int d\boldsymbol{\xi}\widetilde{u}\left(\boldsymbol{\xi},t\right)\xi_{i}}{\int d\boldsymbol{\xi}\widetilde{u}\left(\boldsymbol{\xi},t\right)}=0.\label{eq:self-con}
\end{equation}
This self-consistent condition helps us to choose the center of mass
of $\widetilde{u}\left(\mathbf{x},t\right)$ to be origin of basis functions
so that the perturbative method can be efficient.
$\widetilde{u}_{k_0k_1}/B$, $p_{k_0k_1}$ and $c_i$ can be solved
numerically by regarding $\widetilde{\beta}B$ as a constant and setting
time derivatives equal to zero.
For each $\widetilde{\beta}B$, $\widetilde k$
and $\widetilde \beta$ are related by
\begin{equation}
\tilde{k} = \frac{32\pi a^{2}}{\sum_{k_{0}k_{1}}\left(\frac{\widetilde{u}_{k_{0}k_{1}}\left(t\right)}{B}\right)^{2}}\left[\frac{1}{\widetilde{\beta}B}\widetilde{\beta}-\frac{1}{\left(\widetilde{\beta}B\right)^{2}}\widetilde{\beta}^{2}\right].
\end{equation}
Then fixed point solutions corresponding to each
$\left(\widetilde k,\widetilde\beta\right)$ can be solved.
By comparing the fixed point solution with the
simulation results, we found that not only fixed point solutions
but also various measurements of the network
state are determined by $\widetilde{\beta}B$ as shown in Figure \ref{fig:std_u00}.
In Figures \ref{fig:std_u00}(b) and \ref{fig:std_u00}(c),
we compare the values of the second-order variables between simulations
and theoretical predictions by transforming them to the polar coordinates
via $\xi_{0}=r\cos\theta$ and $\xi_{1}=r\sin\theta$.
We can convert second-order basis functions for $\widetilde{u}\left(\mathbf{x},t\right)$
to be combinations of their polar counterparts. Then we can obtain a
linear combination of basis functions in polar coordinates:
\begin{align}
& ~ \widetilde{u}_{20}\psi_{2}\left(\xi_{0}\right)\psi_{0}\left(\xi_{1}\right)+\widetilde{u}_{02}\psi_{0}\left(\xi_{0}\right)\psi_{2}\left(\xi_{1}\right)+\widetilde{u}_{11}\psi_{1}\left(\xi_{0}\right)\psi_{1}\left(\xi_{1}\right)\nonumber \\
= & ~ \left(\widetilde{u}_{20}+\widetilde{u}_{02}\right)\frac{1}{2a\sqrt{\pi}}\left(\frac{1}{4}\frac{r^{2}}{a^{2}}-1\right)e^{-\frac{r^{2}}{4a^{2}}}+\left(\widetilde{u}_{20}-\widetilde{u}_{02}-\sqrt{2}i\widetilde{u}_{11}\right)\frac{1}{8a\sqrt{\pi}}\frac{r^{2}}{a^{2}}e^{-\frac{r^{2}}{4a^{2}}}e^{i2\theta}\nonumber \\
& ~ +\left(\widetilde{u}_{20}-\widetilde{u}_{02}+\sqrt{2}i\widetilde{u}_{11}\right)\frac{1}{8a\sqrt{\pi}}\frac{r^{2}}{a^{2}}e^{-\frac{r^{2}}{4a^{2}}}e^{-i2\theta}.\label{eq:std_rect2rot}
\end{align}
In order to compare predictions to simulation results without considering
the moving direction in the 2D field, we use $\left(\widetilde{u}_{20}+\widetilde{u}_{02}\right)/B$
(in Figure \ref{fig:std_u00}(b)) and \\
$\left|\widetilde{u}_{20}-\widetilde{u}_{02}-\sqrt{2}i\widetilde{u}_{11}\right|/B$
(in Figure \ref{fig:std_u00}(c)) for the case of $k_{0}+k_{1}=2$.
$\left(\widetilde{u}_{20}+\widetilde{u}_{02}\right)$ is the
average change in the width of the bump-shaped profile relative to
the closest static solution, while $\left|\widetilde{u}_{20}-\widetilde{u}_{02}-\sqrt{2}i\widetilde{u}_{11}\right|$
is the magnitude of the anisotropic mode. Illustrations of the polar
functions in Eq. (\ref{eq:std_rect2rot}) are shown in Figure \ref{fig:std_basis_polar}.
\begin{figure}
\begin{centering}
\includegraphics[width=1\textwidth]{NECO-06-014-2141_Figure. 06}
\par\end{centering}
\protect\caption{\label{fig:std_basis_polar} Distortional modes for $k_{0}+k_{1}=2$.}
\end{figure}
Since $B$ is proportional to $\widetilde{u}_{00}^{2}$, an increase of
$\widetilde{u}_{00}/B$ implies a decrease in $\widetilde{u}_{00}$. In Figure
\ref{fig:std_u00}(a), the slope of $\widetilde{u}_{00}/B$ is discontinuous
at about $\widetilde{\beta}B\approx0.0137$. For $\widetilde{\beta}B\lesssim0.0137$,
the slope is significantly larger than that in the region of $\widetilde{\beta}B\gtrsim0.0137$.
This implies that the motion of a bump helps the bump to maintain its magnitude.
It also agrees with the tendency of the average membrane potential
(or neuronal activity) profile in 1D CANN that the bump tends to move to
a region with a higher concentration of neurotransmitters \citep{York2009,Fung2012a}.
Figure \ref{fig:std_u00}(c) suggests that an anisotropic mode happens
only when the bump is not static, while Figure \ref{fig:std_u00}(b) shows
that the average width of $u(\mathbf{x},t)$ profile increases with the
strength of STD. The behavior of the average change in width, $\left(\widetilde{u}_{20}+\widetilde{u}_{02}\right)$,
is similar to that in height. The anisotropic mode happens only when
the bump is moving. This suggests that the bump get widened unevenly
due to the asymmetric $p(\mathbf{x},t)$ profile.
\subsection{Phase Diagram}
In the previous subsection, we have shown that the
perturbative method can successfully predict different modes of
distortions of $\widetilde{u}\left(\mathbf{x},t\right)$ and
the intrinsic speed of spontaneous motion. We have also
predicted the phase boundary separating translationally stable
static bumps and translationally unstable static bumps.
To predict different phases in the parameter space, however,
we need to study the stability of fixed point solutions given by
Eqs. (\ref{eq:dukkdt}), (\ref{eq:dpkkdt}) and (\ref{eq:dBdt}).
A detailed discussion of the stability issue can be found in Appendix
\ref{subsec:moving_std}.
By studying the stability of fixed point moving solutions, we can
obtain a phase boundary separating silent and
moving phases, as plotted as a dashed line in Figure
\ref{fig:phase_diagram_std}. In Figure \ref{fig:phase_diagram_std},
there is a rather complete phase diagram for the model of 2D CANNs
with STD we are studying here. For small enough $\widetilde\beta$s
(below the solid curve in Figure \ref{fig:phase_diagram_std}),
since static bumps are stable in amplitude and translation,
this parameter region supports only static bumps. This region
is called the static phase.
For parameters between the dotted line and the solid line,
static bumps are stable in amplitude but unstable against translational
distortions. So in this case, in a rather short time window,
both static bumps and moving bumps are able to exist. Because
once a translationally unstable static bump get perturbed, it becomes
a moving bump. Since both static bumps and moving bumps are
observed in this parameter region, we call it the
bistable phase. If we further increase $\widetilde\beta$, however,
even static bump cannot be observed. And only
moving bumps can be observed in the parameter region, we call it
the moving phase. When both $\widetilde k$ and $\widetilde \beta$ are
large, no non-trivial solution can be found in our analysis or
simulations.
In this study we did not find the homogeneous firing patterns
reported by \cite{York2009}. In the 1D case, however, homogeneous
firing can be found in the $\widetilde k \rightarrow 0$ regime
\citep{Wang2014}. Since we are focusing on moderate magnitudes of
$\widetilde k$, the possibility of uniform firing behavior in
2D CANNs with STD near $\widetilde k = 0$ is reserved for future
studies.
\section{CANNs with SFA}
\subsection{Stationary Solution}
By setting $\widetilde\beta=0$ in Eq. (\ref{eq:dpdt}), the
CANN model we are considering becomes a network with
SFA only. To study the stationary solution in this case, we assume
\begin{align}
u\left(\mathbf{x}\right) = & ~ u_{00}\exp\left(-\frac{\mathbf{x}^{2}}{4a^{2}}\right),\label{eq:u0_sub_stat_fixed}\\
v\left(\mathbf{x}\right) = & ~ v_{00}\exp\left(-\frac{\mathbf{x}^{2}}{4a^{2}}\right).\label{eq:v0_sub_stat_fixed}
\end{align}
By substituting Eqs. (\ref{eq:u0_sub_stat_fixed}) and
(\ref{eq:v0_sub_stat_fixed}) into Eqs. (\ref{eq:dudt}) and
(\ref{eq:dvdt_sub}), we found that the fixed point solution
is given by
\begin{align}
\widetilde{u}_{00} = & ~ 4\frac{1\pm\sqrt{1-\left(1+\gamma\right)^{2}\widetilde{k}}}{\left(1+\gamma\right)\widetilde{k}},\label{eq:u0_sub_stat}\\
\widetilde{v}_{00} = & ~ 4\gamma\frac{1\pm\sqrt{1-\left(1+\gamma\right)^{2}\widetilde{k}}}{\left(1+\gamma\right)\widetilde{k}},\label{eq:v0_sub_stat}\\
B = & ~ 2\frac{1\pm\sqrt{1-\left(1+\gamma\right)^{2}\widetilde{k}}}{\left(1+\gamma\right)^{2}\widetilde{k}}.\label{eq:B_sub_stat}
\end{align}
$\widetilde{u}_{00}$ is a rescaled variable defined by $\widetilde{u}_{00}\equiv\rho J_{0}u_{00}$.
Similarly, $\widetilde{v}_{00}\equiv\rho J_{0}v_{00}$. We can also rescale
$u(\mathbf{x},t)$ and $v(\mathbf{x},t)$ in the same way: i.e., $\widetilde{u}(\mathbf{x},t)\equiv\rho J_{0}u(\mathbf{x},t)$
and $\widetilde{v}(\mathbf{x},t)\equiv\rho J_{0}v(\mathbf{x},t)$. For
$\tau_{B}=0$, the fixed point solution with the larger $\widetilde{u}_{00}$
and $\widetilde{v}_{00}$ is stable whenever
\begin{equation}
0<\widetilde{k}<\frac{1+2\gamma}{\left(1+\gamma\right)^4},\label{eq:amp_stable_sub}
\end{equation}
which is labeled by curve $L$ in Figure \ref{fig:max_tauB} for
$\widetilde{k}=0.3$. The stability issue can be studied by
considering the dynamics of distortions of dynamical variables
from their fixed point solutions. Let
\begin{align}
\widetilde{u}\left(\mathbf{x},t\right) = & ~ \left[\widetilde{u}_{00}+\delta\widetilde{u}_{00}\left(t\right)\right]\exp\left(-\frac{\mathbf{x}^{2}}{4a^{2}}\right),\\
\widetilde{v}\left(\mathbf{x},t\right) = & ~ \left[\widetilde{v}_{00}+\delta\widetilde{v}_{00}\left(t\right)\right]\exp\left(-\frac{\mathbf{x}^{2}}{4a^{2}}\right),\\
B\left(t\right) = & ~ B+\delta B\left(t\right).
\end{align}
By studying the stability of fixed point solutions,
we obtain a parameter region for static bumps with stable amplitudes.
Detailed analysis of the stability issue can be found in Appendix
\ref{subsec:static_sub}. Regions for $\widetilde k = 0.3$ and
various $(\tau_i/\tau_s)$s are
shown in Figure \ref{fig:max_tauB}.
For $\tau_{B}>0$, the parameter region over the $(\widetilde{k},\gamma)$
space becomes smaller as $\tau_{B}$ increases. At the
$\tau_{i}\gg\tau_{s}$ limit, the range of $\widetilde{k}$ to stabilize
the static solution is given by
\begin{equation}
0<\widetilde{k}<\frac{2\gamma+1}{\left(1+\gamma\right)^{4}},
\end{equation}
which agrees with Eq. (\ref{eq:amp_stable_sub}).
On the other hand, if $\tau_{B}/\tau_{s}\ge1$, there will be no static
solution. In Figure \ref{fig:max_tauB}, we have shown that if $\gamma$
becomes larger, the maximum value of $\tau_{B}/\tau_{s}$ to stabilize
the static solution will be smaller.
\begin{figure}
\begin{centering}
\includegraphics[width=0.8\textwidth]{NECO-06-014-2141_Figure. 07}\protect\caption{\label{fig:max_tauB} Maximum $\tau_{B}/\tau_{s}$ able to stabilize
the amplitude of stationary solutions as a function of $\gamma$,
given that $\widetilde{k}=0.3$. $L$: maximum $\gamma$ of the existence
of stationary solutions. }
\par\end{centering}
\end{figure}
\subsection{Translational Stability}
To study the translational stability, we consider the lowest-order
asymmetric distortions added to the stationary solution. The major
concern here is the step function in Eq. (\ref{eq:f_u2v}), but the
step function does not have a first-order effect on translational
distortions. We let
\begin{align}
u\left(\mathbf{x},t\right) = & ~ u_{00}\left(t\right)\exp\left(-\frac{\left|\mathbf{x}\right|^{2}}{4a^{2}}\right),\label{eq:u0_3}\\
v\left(\mathbf{x},t\right) = & ~ v_{00}\left(t\right)\exp\left(-\frac{\left|\mathbf{x}\right|^{2}}{4a^{2}}\right)+v_{10}\left(t\right)\frac{x_{0}}{a}\exp\left(-\frac{\left|\mathbf{x}\right|^{2}}{4a^{2}}\right).\label{eq:v0v1}
\end{align}
As we are studying the stability issue of the static solution,
let us adopt the solution in Eqs. (\ref{eq:u0_sub_stat}) - (\ref{eq:B_sub_stat})
and put $v_{10}=0$. Then the dynamics of distortions of dynamical
variables near fixed point static solutions becomes
\begin{equation}
\tau_{s}\frac{d}{dt}\left(\begin{array}{c}
\delta\widetilde{u}_{00}\left(t\right)\\
\delta\widetilde{v}_{00}\left(t\right)\\
\delta B\left(t\right)\\
\delta\widetilde{v}_{10}\left(t\right)
\end{array}\right)\\
= \left(\begin{array}{cc}
\mathscr{A}_{\rm SFA} & 0\\
0 & -\frac{\tau_{s}}{\tau_{i}}+\gamma
\end{array}\right)
\left(\begin{array}{c}
\delta\widetilde{u}_{00}\left(t\right)\\
\delta\widetilde{v}_{00}\left(t\right)\\
\delta B\left(t\right)\\
\delta\widetilde{v}_{10}\left(t\right)
\end{array}\right) ,
\label{eq:trans_stable_sub}
\end{equation}
where the $3\times3$ matrix $\mathscr{A}_{\rm SFA}$
is provided in Appendix \ref{subsec:static_sub}.
$\mathscr{A}_{\rm SFA}$ determines amplitudal stability of
the static solution. Clearly, the variable $v_{10}$ becomes unstable
if $\gamma>\tau_{s}/\tau_{i}$. This implies that if the dynamics of SFA is
slow enough, the static solution will be translationally unstable.
\subsection{Moving Solution}
Once $\gamma>\tau_{s}/\tau_{i}$ is satisfied, spontaneous motion
of a bump-shaped solution in 2D CANN with SFA becomes possible. As
in the STD case, however, lower-order expansions of $u\left(\mathbf{x},t\right)$
and $p\left(\mathbf{x},t\right)$ are not sufficient to describe the
moving solutions. We have to consider higher-order expansions if we want
to obtain good predictions on the behavior of moving solutions.
Surprisingly, we found that a limited order of expansion of
$u\left(\mathbf{x},t\right)$ and $v\left(\mathbf{x},t\right)$
can give some fairly good predictions on the moving solutions.
In general, we consider
\begin{align}
u\left(\mathbf{x},t\right) = & ~ \sum_{k_{0}k_{1}}u_{k_{0}k_{1}}\left(t\right)\phi_{k_{0}}\left(\xi_{0}\right)\phi_{k_{1}}\left(\xi_{1}\right),\\
v\left(\mathbf{x},t\right) = & ~ \sum_{k_{0}k_{1}}v_{k_{0}k_{1}}\left(t\right)\phi_{k_{0}}\left(\xi_{0}\right)\phi_{k_{1}}\left(\xi_{1}\right).
\end{align}
Here
\begin{equation}
\phi_{k_{i}}\left(\xi_{i}\right)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{\sqrt{2\pi}ak_{i}!}}H_{k_{i}}\left(\frac{\xi_{i}}{a}\right)\exp\left(-\frac{\xi_{i}^{2}}{4a^{2}}\right)
\end{equation}
and $H_{k_{i}}$ is the $k_{i}^{\text{th}}$-order probabilist's Hermite
polynomial. Eqs. (\ref{eq:u0_sub_stat}) and (\ref{eq:v0_sub_stat})
become
\begin{align}
&~ \tau_{s}\frac{d\widetilde{u}_{k_{0}k_{1}}}{dt}\left(t\right) \nonumber \\
= &~ -\widetilde{u}_{k_{0}k_{1}}\left(t\right)-\widetilde{v}_{k_{0}k_{1}}\left(t\right)+\frac{1}{B\left(t\right)}\sum_{n_{0}n_{1}m_{0}m_{1}}C_{n_{0}m_{0}}^{k_{0}}C_{n_{1}m_{1}}^{k_{1}}\widetilde{u}_{n_{0}n_{1}}\left(t\right)\widetilde{u}_{m{}_{0}m_{1}}\left(t\right), \nonumber\\
& ~ \qquad\qquad\qquad -\frac{\tau_{s}c_{0}}{2a}\left[\sqrt{k_{0}}\widetilde{u}_{k_{0}-1,k_{1}}\left(t\right)-\sqrt{k_{0}+1}\widetilde{u}_{k_{0}+1,k_{1}}\left(t\right)\right]\nonumber \\
&~ \qquad\qquad\qquad-\frac{\tau_{s}c_{1}}{2a}\left[\sqrt{k_{1}}\widetilde{u}_{k_{0},k_{1}-1}\left(t\right)-\sqrt{k_{1}+1}\widetilde{u}_{k_{0},k_{1}+1}\left(t\right)\right]\\
&~ \tau_{i}\frac{d\widetilde{v}_{k_{0}k_{1}}}{dt}\left(t\right) \nonumber \\
= &~ -\widetilde{v}_{k_{0}k_{1}}\left(t\right)+\gamma\widetilde{u}_{k_{0}k_{1}}\left(t\right) \nonumber \\
&~\qquad\qquad\qquad-\frac{\tau_{i}c_0}{2a}\left[\sqrt{k_{0}}\widetilde{v}_{k_{0}-1,k_{1}}\left(t\right)-\sqrt{k_{0}+1}\widetilde{v}_{k_{0}+1,k_{1}}\left(t\right)\right]\nonumber \\
&~\qquad\qquad\qquad-\frac{\tau_{i}c_{1}}{2a}\left[\sqrt{k_{1}}\widetilde{v}_{k_{0},k_{1}-1}\left(t\right)-\sqrt{k_{1}+1}\widetilde{v}_{k_{0},k_{1}+1}\left(t\right)\right]
\end{align}
Together with the self-consistent condition, Eq. (\ref{eq:self-con}),
the fixed point solution is solvable. Here the definition of $C_{nm}^k$
is not the same as that in Eq. (\ref{eq:std_Cnmk}), which is defined by
\begin{equation}
C_{nm}^{k} \equiv \int d\xi\phi_{k}\left(\xi\right)\int d\xi^{\prime}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}a}e^{-\frac{\left(\xi-\xi^{\prime}\right)^{2}}{2a^{2}}}\phi_{n}\left(\xi^{\prime}\right)\phi_{m}\left(\xi^{\prime}\right). \label{eq:Cknm_sub}
\end{equation}
$C_{00}^0$ can be calculated explicitly. In general, $C^k_{nm}$ can be
obtained by using the recurrence relations given in Appendix
\ref{subsec:moving_Cknm_sub}.
If we consider only terms up
to $k_{0}+k_{1}=2$ and motion along the $x_{0}$-direction, we can obtain
the intrinsic speed of the moving solution (detailed derivation can be
found in Appendix \ref{subsec:moving_speed_sub}):
\begin{equation}
\frac{\tau_{s}\left|c_{0}\right|}{2a}=\frac{\tau_{s}}{\tau_{i}}\sqrt{\frac{1}{3}\left(\frac{\tau_{i}}{\tau_{s}}\gamma-1\right)}.
\end{equation}
As the preferred stimulus space is rotationally symmetric,
this speed is applicable to motion in any direction. Even though this
is an approximated solution with relatively few terms, the prediction
on the intrinsic speed is fairly good, as shown in Figure \ref{fig:sub_c}.
This result suggests that, in this case, the terms with $k_{0}+k_{1}\le2$
are sufficient to give some good predictions on the behavior of bump-shaped
solutions. For predictions on measurements of different components
of the moving bump, however, we still need to use higher-order perturbation.
In Figures \ref{fig:sub_u00}(a)~-~(c), we have shown that higher-order
perturbation is needed to predict $\widetilde{u}_{k_{0}k_{1}}/B$
if the bump is moving. As in Figures \ref{fig:std_u00}(b)
and \ref{fig:std_u00}(c),
in Figures \ref{fig:sub_u00}(b) and \ref{fig:sub_u00}(c), we do not compare
$\widetilde{u}_{20}$, $\widetilde{u}_{02}$ and $\widetilde{u}_{11}$ directly.
Since a moving bump can move in any directions, we
compare their projections in polar coordinates. Let us consider
$\xi_{0}=r\cos\theta$ and $\xi_{1}=r\sin\theta$. Then we have
\begin{align}
& ~ \widetilde{u}_{20}\phi_{2}\left(\xi_{0}\right)\phi_{0}\left(\xi_{1}\right)+\widetilde{u}_{02}\phi_{0}\left(\xi_{0}\right)\phi_{2}\left(\xi_{1}\right)+\widetilde{u}_{11}\phi_{1}\left(\xi_{0}\right)\phi_{1}\left(\xi_{1}\right)\nonumber \\
= & ~ \left(\widetilde{u}_{20}+\widetilde{u}_{02}\right)\frac{1}{2a\sqrt{\pi}}\left(\frac{1}{2}\frac{r^{2}}{a^{2}}-1\right)e^{-\frac{r^{2}}{4a^{2}}}+\left(\widetilde{u}_{20}-\widetilde{u}_{02}-\sqrt{2}i\widetilde{u}_{11}\right)\frac{1}{8a\sqrt{\pi}}\frac{r^{2}}{a^{2}}e^{-\frac{r^{2}}{4a^{2}}}e^{i2\theta}\nonumber \\
& ~ +\left(\widetilde{u}_{20}-\widetilde{u}_{02}+\sqrt{2}i\widetilde{u}_{11}\right)\frac{1}{8a\sqrt{\pi}}\frac{r^{2}}{a^{2}}e^{-\frac{r^{2}}{4a^{2}}}e^{-i2\theta}.\label{eq:sfa_rect2rot}
\end{align}
In Figures \ref{fig:sub_u00}(b) and \ref{fig:sub_u00}(c), we compare predictions
and simulation results of $\left(\widetilde{u}_{20}+\widetilde{u}_{02}\right)$
and $\left|\widetilde{u}_{20}-\widetilde{u}_{02}-\sqrt{2}i\widetilde{u}_{11}\right|$
for $k_{0}+k_{1}=2$ and $k_0+k_1=10$. $\left(\widetilde{u}_{20}+\widetilde{u}_{02}\right)$
is the average change in the width of the bump-shaped profile, while $\left|\widetilde{u}_{20}-\widetilde{u}_{02}-\sqrt{2}i\widetilde{u}_{11}\right|$
is the magnitude of the anisotropic mode. The graphical illustration
of Eq. (\ref{eq:sfa_rect2rot}) is omitted because it is similar to the
illustrations shown in Figure \ref{fig:std_basis_polar}.
The behavior of moving solutions of CANNs with SFA
is similar to that of moving solutions of
CANNs with STD. For $\widetilde{u}_{00}/B$, its
trend is basically the same as $\widetilde{u}_{00}/B$ in the case with
STD shown in Figure \ref{fig:std_u00}. The transition happens whenever
$\gamma=\tau_{s}/\tau_{i}$. Also, anisotropic modes will be
available only when the bump is moving, while the width of the $u(\mathbf{x},t)$
profile increases as the strength of SFA
increases. The behavior of the average change in width is similar
to the behavior of the change in height, $\widetilde{u}_{00}$. The dependence
of anisotropic modes on the strength of SFA, $\gamma$,
implies that the widening effect is not uniform when the bump is moving,
which is similar to what is seen in a 2D CANN with STD.
\begin{figure}
\begin{centering}
\includegraphics[width=0.8\textwidth]{NECO-06-014-2141_Figure. 08}
\par\end{centering}
\centering{}\protect\caption{\label{fig:sub_c} Speed of spontaneous motions as a function of $\gamma$.}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure}
\begin{centering}
\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{NECO-06-014-2141_Figure. 09}
\par\end{centering}
\protect\caption{\label{fig:sub_u00}
(a) Projection of $\widetilde{u}\left(\mathbf{x},t\right)$
on $\phi_{0}\left(\xi_{0}\right)\phi_{0}\left(\xi_{1}\right)$.
(b) Projection of $\widetilde{u}\left(\mathbf{x},t\right)$
on rotationally symmetric basis function with $k_{0}+k_{1}=2$.
(c) Projection of $\widetilde{u}\left(\mathbf{x},t\right)$
on anisotropic basis function with $k_{0}+k_{1}=2$.
(a) - (c) Parameters: $a=0.5$, $\tau_{i}/\tau_{s}=10$ and $\tau_{B}/\tau_{s}=0.1$.}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure}
\begin{centering}
\includegraphics[width=0.8\textwidth]{NECO-06-014-2141_Figure. 10}
\par\end{centering}
\begin{centering}
\protect\caption{\label{fig:sub_phase_diagram} Phase diagram over the parameter space
spanned by $\left(\widetilde{k},\gamma\right)$. Dotted line: boundary predicted
for moving solutions by $k_{0}+k_{1}=2$ perturbation. Solid line: boundary predicted
for moving solutions by $k_{0}+k_{1}=10$ perturbation. Dotted line: boundary predicted
for static solutions with stable amplitudes by $k_{0}+k_{1}=0$ perturbation. Dot-dashed
line: boundary predicted for static solutions with stable amplitudes
and translational stability by $k_{0}+k_{1}=0$ perturbation.
Parameters: same as Figure \ref{fig:sub_u00}. Symbols:
corresponding simulations.}
\end{centering}
\end{figure}
\subsection{Phase Diagram}
A phase diagram similar to Figure \ref{fig:phase_diagram_std} for SFA
can be obtained in a similar manner used for CANNs with STD. In the
previous subsection, we have shown that perturbative analysis is
able to predict dynamical variables of the model. By solving for the moving
solutions numerically and testing their stability, we can predict
the phase boundary separating parameter regions for moving solutions
and trivial solution (silent phase). Using it together with the
stability conditions for static bumps given in Eqs.
(\ref{eq:amp_stable_sub}) and (\ref{eq:trans_stable_sub}),
we can predict the phase diagram for SFA. We found that the predicted
phase diagram matches the phase diagram obtained from computer
simulations (Figure \ref{fig:sub_phase_diagram}).
As in Figure \ref{fig:phase_diagram_std}, there are four phases in
the phase diagram: a static phase, a bistable phase, a
moving phase and a silent phase. Their meanings are the same as those of their
counterparts in Figure \ref{fig:phase_diagram_std}.
Remarkably, expansions up to $k_{0}+k_{1}=2$ can also predict the
phase diagram well, which is similar to the prediction of
intrinsic speed of moving bumps in CANNs with SFA.
\section{Discussion}
\subsection{Intrinsic Phases and Phase Diagrams}
In the parameter spaces of the two models we studied in this paper,
there are static, bistable, moving and silent phases. When
$\widetilde\beta$ is large enough, moving bumps can
be found in bistable phase and moving phase. This behavior can
also be seen in the case of SFA. In both STD and SFA cases,
whenever $\widetilde\beta$ or $\gamma$ is not too large (within
the bistable phase), static bumps can still exist for a not insignificant
period of time. If $\widetilde\beta$ or $\gamma$ is too large,
only trivial solutions are stable.
Behaviors of CANNs with STD are very similar to those of CANNs with SFA.
This suggests that multiplicative dynamical suppression mechanisms
(represented by STD) and subtractive dynamical suppression mechanisms
(represented by SFA) can generate similar intrinsic dynamics,
especially with regard to spontaneous motion.
It also implies that other smooth models having homogeneous couplings
and dynamical suppression mechanisms should have a similar phase diagram
consisting of static, moving, bistable and silent phases.
In some studies on CANNs with STD or SFA it is reported that,
with some parameters, uniform firing pattern can be found in
the network \citep[e.g.][]{York2009}.
In the present study, uniform firing is not included because the
interactive range of the global inhibition in this model is infinite.
So uniform firing may only be found in a tight parameter region near
$\widetilde k\rightarrow 0$. For the 1D STD case, uniform firing can be
found in a region $\widetilde\beta \rightarrow 0$ and
$\widetilde k \rightarrow 0$ \citep{Wang2014}. Uniform firing
should also be found in 2D CANNs with STD or SFA, as should
spiral waves and breathing wavefronts. There is a report on
spiral waves and breathing wavefronts in 2D
CANNs with STD \citep[e.g.][]{Kilpatrick2010}, but those phenomena are
missing from the phase diagram we predicted because spiral
waves and breathing wavefronts are not local
patterns. Therefore in the present model they may exist if
the magnitude of divisive global inhibition is very small.
Richer dynamics of the present model for $\widetilde k\rightarrow 0$
is reserved for future investigations.
\subsection{Effectiveness of Perturbative Approach}
In this paper we have shown that, in the present particular model,
the perturbative expansion method is applicable to the study of
continuous attractor neural networks (CANNs) with short-term synaptic
depression (STD) or spike frequency adaptation (SFA). We found in
this study that both STD and SFA can drive similar
intrinsic dynamics of the local neural activity profile. In Figures
\ref{fig:phase_diagram_std} and \ref{fig:sub_phase_diagram} there
are four phases: silent, static, bistable and moving. Using perturbative
expansions on the dynamical variables, we can successfully predict
the phase diagrams in both cases with STD and SFA.
As expected, with low-order expansions (i.e., when $k_{0}+k_{1}$ is
small), predictions on $\widetilde{u}_{k_{0}k_{1}}$'s of the static
solutions work well in cases with STD and SFA.
For moving solutions, higher-order expansions are needed to obtain
more accurate solutions. In Figures \ref{fig:std_u00}(a) - (c)
and Figure \ref{fig:sub_u00} it is shown that low-order perturbative
expansions, $k_{0}+k_{1}=3$ for STD and $k_{0}+k_{1}=2$
for SFA, are able to show the general trend of dynamical variables.
Especially, the second-order transitions in all the dynamical variables
(i.e. discontinuities of slopes)
are observed at this level of perturbative expansion. This suggests
that low-order perturbative expansions are good enough for studying
general phenomena in different phases.
To predict the behavior of the dynamical variables more accurately,
we need to use higher-order perturbative expansions. We have shown
in Figures \ref{fig:std_u00}(a) - (c) and Figure \ref{fig:sub_u00}
that higher-order perturbative expansions, $k_{0}+k_{1}=11$
for STD and $k_{0}+k_{1}=10$ for SFA, can fit measurements from
simulations accurately. Higher-order terms do not, however, significantly
improve prediction of the speed of spontaneous motion. This suggests
that lower-order perturbative modes are most important to the motion
of the local neural activity profile.
\begin{figure}
\begin{centering}
\includegraphics[width=1\textwidth]{NECO-06-014-2141_Figure. 11}
\par\end{centering}
\protect\caption{\label{fig:std_exp} Snapshots of $\widetilde{u}\left(\mathbf{x},t\right)$
and $p\left(\mathbf{x},t\right)$ in the static phase ((a) and (c)) and
moving phase ((b) and (d)). (a) and (b) are $\widetilde{u}\left(\mathbf{x},t\right)$,
while (c) and (d) are $p\left(\mathbf{x},t\right)$. Dashed lines:
contours for $\widetilde{u}\left(\mathbf{x},t\right)=4$. $\left(z_{0},z_{1}\right)$
is the center of mass of $\widetilde{u}\left(\mathbf{x},t\right)$. The moving
direction of the bump is the $\left(1,1\right)$ direction, shows by the arrows
in (b) and (d). Parameters: $\widetilde{k}=0.5$, $\tau_{d}/\tau_{s}=50$ and
$\widetilde{\beta}=0.001$ for (a) and (c), and $\widetilde{\beta}=0.1$ for (b) and (d).}
\end{figure}
\subsection{Asymmetric Modes and Moving Solutions}
Higher-order perturbative modes are essential for predicting the behavior
of dynamical variables of moving solutions accurately because the dynamical
variables will become asymmetric about the center of mass of $\widetilde{u}\left(\mathbf{x},t\right)$
if the neural activity profile is moving. In Figure \ref{fig:std_exp},
there are two examples of CANNs with different levels of STD. Figures
\ref{fig:std_exp}(a) and \ref{fig:std_exp}(c) are with $\widetilde{\beta}=0.001$,
which corresponds to the static phase. In this case, both the average membrane potential profile $\widetilde{u}\left(\mathbf{x},t\right)$ and the
fraction of available neurotransmitters $p\left(\mathbf{x},t\right)$ are rotationally
symmetric about the center of mass of $\widetilde{u}\left(\mathbf{x},t\right)$.
Therefore, in the static phase, low-order perturbation is good enough for making predictions.
Snapshots of $\widetilde{u}\left(\mathbf{x},t\right)$ and
$p\left(\mathbf{x},t\right)$ in the moving phase
are shown in Figures \ref{fig:std_exp}(b) and \ref{fig:std_exp}(d).
Here the level of STD is $\widetilde{\beta}=0.1$. In this case, $\widetilde{u}\left(\mathbf{x},t\right)$
seems to be rotationally symmetric about its center of mass. Actually,
the shape of the Gaussian-like average membrane potential profile is slightly
squeezed along the moving direction. For $p\left(\mathbf{x},t\right)$, however,
the deformation of the shape is more significant. In Figure \ref{fig:std_exp}(d),
the profile of $p\left(\mathbf{x},t\right)$ is strongly biased against
the moving direction. This highly skewed profile of $p\left(\mathbf{x},t\right)$
makes high-order perturbative mode more important, especially for
cases involving stability and predictions of dynamical variables.
\subsection{Limitation of Perturbative Approach}
In this paper, we have shown the perturbative approach is able to
successfully predict 1) the phase diagrams of CANNs with STD or SFA,
2) the speed of spontaneous motion and 3)
the dynamical variables (e.g. $\widetilde{u}\left(x,t\right)$).
Phenomena richer than spontaneous motion of local neural activity,
for example, breathing wavefronts on neural networks have been
considered theoretically \citep{Kilpatrick2010}. The perturbative
formulation is not applicable in that case, however, because
the basis function we used here are local, while the traveling
wavefronts are globally spreading. For the same reason, this method cannot
be used to analyze also spiral waves on a 2D field.
In the case of collisions of two moving bump-shaped profiles of neuronal
activity, one may find the dynamics hard to analyze by the
perturbative method. This is because there are two centers of mass,
one for each bump, and this makes the choice of the origin of basis functions
confusing. For example, if one chose one of the centers of mass to
be the origin of basis functions, the chosen family of basis functions
will not be optimal for the other bump and will make the expansion of
that bump less efficient.
\section*{Conclusion}
In this paper we studied models with short-term synaptic depression
and spike frequency adaptation and these models which was based on
a two-dimensional CANN model with divisive global inhibition.
We found that their intrinsic dynamics were similar. First, there
are four phases in each scenario. They are static, moving, bistable
and silent. The moving phase is the phase in which the bump-shaped
profile moves spontaneously, while the static phase is the phase in
which the bump-shaped profile cannot move spontaneously. Interestingly,
in the bistable phase, the CANN can support both moving profiles and
static profiles.
Second, there are clear phase transitions between static solutions
and moving solutions. In Figures \ref{fig:std_u00}, \ref{fig:sub_c} and
\ref{fig:sub_u00} there is a clear discontinuity in slope between the
two states. This suggests that, spontaneous motion can affect the
shapes of the bump-shaped profiles.
The stability of steady states, the shapes of the dynamical variables
and the speed of spontaneous motion can be predicted by perturbative
analysis, but perturbative method cannot be used in some
scenarios including spiral waves, breathing wavefronts and collisions
of multiple bumps in 2D fields.
\subsection*{Acknowledgments}
This study is partially supported by the Research Grants Council of
Hong Kong (grant numbers 604512, 605813 and N\_HKUST 606/12).
\renewcommand\thesubsection{\Alph{subsection}}
\numberwithin{equation}{subsection}
\setcounter{subsection}{0}
\section*{Appendix}
\subsection{\label{subsec:static_std} Amplitudal Stability of Bumps on 2D CANNs with STD}
To study the stability of fixed point solutions of
Eqs. (\ref{eq:du00dt_std}) - (\ref{eq:dBdt_std}), we assume
\begin{align}
\widetilde u_{00}\left(t\right) = & ~ \widetilde u_{00}^{*} + \delta \widetilde u_{00}\left(t\right),\\
p_{00}\left(t\right) = & ~ p_{00}^{*} + \delta p_{00}\left(t\right),\\
B\left(t\right) = & ~ B^{*} + \delta B\left(t\right).
\end{align}
Linearizing Eqs. (\ref{eq:du00dt_std}) - (\ref{eq:dBdt_std}),
we obtain
\begin{equation}
\tau_{s}
\frac{d}{dt}
\left(\begin{array}{c}
\widetilde{u}_{00}\left(t\right) \\
p_{00}\left(t\right) \\
B \left(t\right)
\end{array}\right)
=
\mathscr{A}_{\rm STD}
\left(\begin{array}{c}
\widetilde{u}_{00}\left(t\right) \\
p_{00}\left(t\right) \\
B \left(t\right) ,
\end{array}\right)
\end{equation}
where
\begin{align}
\mathscr{A}_{\rm STD} = & ~ \left(\begin{array}{ccc}
\frac{\partial F_{\widetilde{u}_{00}}\left(\widetilde{u}_{00},p_{00},B\right)}{\partial\widetilde{u}_{00}} & \frac{\partial F_{\widetilde{u}_{00}}\left(\widetilde{u}_{00},p_{00},B\right)}{\partial p_{00}} & \frac{\partial F_{\widetilde{u}_{00}}\left(\widetilde{u}_{00},p_{00},B\right)}{\partial B}\\
\frac{\partial F_{p_{00}}\left(\widetilde{u}_{00},p_{00},B\right)}{\partial\widetilde{u}_{00}} & \frac{\partial F_{p_{00}}\left(\widetilde{u}_{00},p_{00},B\right)}{\partial p_{00}} & \frac{\partial F_{p_{00}}\left(\widetilde{u}_{00},p_{00},B\right)}{\partial B}\\
\frac{\partial F_{B}\left(\widetilde{u}_{00},p_{00},B\right)}{\partial\widetilde{u}_{00}} & \frac{\partial F_{B}\left(\widetilde{u}_{00},p_{00},B\right)}{\partial p_{00}} & \frac{\partial F_{B}\left(\widetilde{u}_{00},p_{00},B\right)}{\partial B}
\end{array}\right)\label{eq:A_std}\\
= & ~ \left(\begin{array}{ccc}
-1+\frac{1}{B}\widetilde{u}_{00}\left(1-\frac{4}{7}\widetilde{p}_{00}\right) & -\frac{2}{7}\frac{1}{B}\widetilde{u}_{00}^{2} & -\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{B^{2}}\widetilde{u}_{00}^{2}\left(1-\frac{4}{7}\widetilde{p}_{00}\right)\\
\frac{2\tau_{s}}{\tau_{d}}\frac{\widetilde{\beta}}{B}\widetilde{u}_{00}\left(1-\frac{2}{3}\widetilde{p}_{00}\right) & -\frac{\tau_{s}}{\tau_{d}}-\frac{2}{3}\frac{\tau_{s}}{\tau_{d}}\frac{\widetilde{\beta}}{B}\widetilde{u}_{00}^{2} & -\frac{\tau_{s}}{\tau_{d}}\frac{\widetilde{\beta}}{B^{2}}\widetilde{u}_{00}^{2}\left(1-\frac{2}{3}\widetilde{p}_{00}\right)\\
\frac{1}{8}\frac{\tau_{s}}{\tau_{B}}\widetilde{k}\widetilde{u}_{00} & 0 & -\frac{\tau_{s}}{\tau_{B}}
\end{array}\right),
\nonumber
\end{align}
and
\begin{align}
F_{\widetilde{u}_{00}}\left(\widetilde{u}_{00},p_{00},B\right) \equiv & ~ -\widetilde{u}_{00}+\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{B}\widetilde{u}_{00}^{2}\left[1-\frac{4}{7}p_{00}\right],\\
F_{p_{00}}\left(\widetilde{u}_{00},p_{00},B\right) \equiv & ~ \frac{\tau_{s}}{\tau_{d}}\left\{ -p_{00}+\frac{1}{B}\widetilde{\beta}\widetilde{u}_{00}^{2}\left[1-\frac{2}{3}p_{00}\right]\right\} ,\\
F_{B}\left(\widetilde{u}_{00},p_{00},B\right) \equiv & ~ \frac{\tau_{s}}{\tau_{B}}\left[-B+1+\frac{1}{16}\widetilde{k}\widetilde{u}_{00}^{2}\right].
\end{align}
By calculating eigenvalues of this matrix for a given fixed point
solution, we can test the stability of each solution.
In Figure \ref{fig:std_parabola}
the parabolas are plotted from $\widetilde{\beta}=0$ to a point such
that the real part of one of the eigenvalues just turns positive.
The solid line in Figure \ref{fig:std_parabola} maps the parameter
region for the existence of static profiles of $u(\mathbf{x},t)$.
For the stability matrix in Eq. (\ref{eq:trans_std}), since $p_{10}=0$
for static states, amplitudal stability and translational stability
are uncoupled. The $\mathscr{A}_{\rm STD}$ in the $4\times4$ matrix in
Eq. (\ref{eq:trans_std}) is the same as that given in Eq. (\ref{eq:A_std}).
\subsection{\label{subsec:moving_sol_std} Derivations of Eqs. (\ref{eq:dukkdt}) - (\ref{eq:dBdt})}
To obtain Eqs. (\ref{eq:dukkdt}) - (\ref{eq:dBdt}), we need to deal
with differentiations
of basis functions $\psi_k\left(\xi\right)$ and
$\varphi_k\left(\xi\right)$:
\begin{align}
\frac{d\psi_k\left(\xi\right)}{d\xi}
= & ~ \frac{1}{2a}\sqrt{k} \psi_{k-1}\left(\xi\right) -
\frac{1}{2a}\sqrt{k+1}\psi_{k-1}\left(\xi\right) \\
\frac{d\varphi_k\left(\xi\right)}{d\xi}
= & ~ \frac{1}{\sqrt 2a}\sqrt{k} \varphi_{k-1}\left(\xi\right) -
\frac{1}{\sqrt 2a}\sqrt{k+1}\varphi_{k-1}\left(\xi\right)
\end{align}
Combining this result with Eqs. (\ref{eq:uk}),
(\ref{eq:pk}), we have
\begin{align}
\tau_s \frac{\partial\widetilde{u}\left(\boldsymbol{\xi},t\right)}{\partial t}
= & ~ \tau_s \sum_{k_0k_1}
\biggl\{\frac{d\widetilde{u}_{k_0k_1}\left(t\right)}{dt}
-\frac{c_0}{2a}\left[\sqrt{k_0+1}\widetilde{u}_{k_0+1,k_1}\left(t\right)
-\sqrt{k_0}\widetilde{u}_{k_0-1,k_1}\left(t\right)\right]\biggr. \nonumber \\
& ~ \biggl.\frac{c_1}{2a}\left[\sqrt{k_1+1}\widetilde{u}_{k_0,k_1+1}\left(t\right)
-\sqrt{k_1}\widetilde{u}_{k_0,k_1-1}\left(t\right)\right]\biggr\}
\psi_{k_0}\left(\xi_0\right)\psi_{k_1}\left(\xi_1\right) \\
\tau_d \frac{\partial p\left(\boldsymbol{\xi},t\right)}{\partial t}
= & ~ -\tau_d \sum_{k_0k_1}
\biggl\{\frac{dp_{k_0k_1}\left(t\right)}{dt}
-\frac{c_0}{\sqrt{2}a}\left[\sqrt{k_0+1}p_{k_0+1,k_1}\left(t\right)
-\sqrt{k_0}p_{k_0-1,k_1}\left(t\right)\right]\biggr. \nonumber \\
& ~ \biggl.\frac{c_1}{\sqrt{2}a}\left[\sqrt{k_1+1}p_{k_0,k_1+1}\left(t\right)
-\sqrt{k_1}p_{k_0,k_1-1}\left(t\right)\right]\biggr\}
\varphi_{k_0}\left(\xi_0\right)\varphi_{k_1}\left(\xi_1\right)
\end{align}
We now obtain the left-hand sides of Eqs. (\ref{eq:dudt}) and (\ref{eq:dpdt}).
For the right-hand sides, by substituting Eqs. (\ref{eq:uk}) and
(\ref{eq:pk}) into right-hand sides of
Eqs. (\ref{eq:dudt}) and (\ref{eq:dpdt}) and projecting
them onto corresponding basis functions, we obtain
\begin{align}
& ~ -\widetilde u\left(\mathbf{x},t\right) +
\frac{1}{B\left(t\right)}\int d\mathbf{x}
\widetilde J\left(\left|\mathbf{x}-\mathbf{x}^\prime\right|\right)
p\left(\mathbf{x}^\prime,t\right)
\widetilde u\left(\mathbf{x}^\prime,t\right)^2 \nonumber \\
= & ~
\sum_{k_0k_1} \widetilde u_{k_0k_1}
\psi_{k_0}\left(\xi_0\right)\psi_{k_1}\left(\xi_1\right) \nonumber \\
& ~ +\frac{1}{B\left(t\right)}\sum_{k_{0}k_{1}}\psi_{k_{0}}\left(\xi_{0}\right)\psi_{k_{1}}\left(\xi_{1}\right)\left(\sum_{n_{0}n_{1}m_{0}m_{1}}C_{n_{0}m_{0}}^{k_{0}}C_{n_{1}m_{1}}^{k_{1}}\widetilde{u}_{n_{0}n_{1}}\widetilde{u}_{m_{0}m_{1}}\right)\nonumber \\
& ~ -\frac{1}{B\left(t\right)}\sum_{k_{0}k_{1}}\psi_{k_{0}}\left(\xi_{0}\right)\psi_{k_{1}}\left(\xi_{1}\right)\left(\sum_{n_{0}n_{1}m_{0}m_{1}l_{0}l_{1}}D_{n_{0}m_{0}l_{0}}^{k_{0}}D_{n_{1}m_{1}l_{1}}^{k_{1}}\widetilde{u}_{n_{0}n_{1}}\widetilde{u}_{m_{0}m_{1}}p_{l_{0}l_{1}}\right), \nonumber \\ \\
& ~ 1-p\left(\mathbf{x},t\right)-\tau_{d}\beta p\left(\mathbf{x},t\right)\frac{\widetilde u\left(\mathbf{x},t\right)^{2}}{B\left(t\right)}\nonumber \\
= & ~ \sum_{k_{0}k_{1}}p_{k_{0}k_{1}}\left(t\right)\varphi_{k_{0}}\left(\xi_{0}\right)\varphi_{k_{1}}\left(\xi_{1}\right)\nonumber \\
& ~ -\frac{\tau_{d}\beta}{B\left(t\right)}\sum_{k_{0}k_{1}}\varphi_{k_{0}}\left(\xi_{0}\right)\varphi_{k_{1}}\left(\xi_{1}\right)\left(\sum_{n_{0}n_{1}m_{0}m_{1}}E_{n_{0}m_{0}}^{k_{0}}E_{n_{1}m_{1}}^{k_{1}}\widetilde{u}_{n_{0}n_{1}}\widetilde{u}_{m_{0}m_{1}}\right)\nonumber \\
& ~ +\frac{\tau_{d}\beta}{B\left(t\right)}\sum_{k_{0}k_{1}}\varphi_{k_{0}}\left(\xi_{0}\right)\varphi_{k_{1}}\left(\xi_{1}\right)\left(\sum_{n_{0}n_{1}m_{0}m_{1}}F_{n_{0}m_{0}l_{0}}^{k_{0}}F_{n_{1}m_{1}l_{1}}^{k_{1}}\widetilde{u}_{n_{0}n_{1}}\widetilde{u}_{m_{0}m_{1}}p_{l_{0}l_{1}}\right).
\end{align}
Here argument $t$ of $\widetilde u_{k_0k_1}$ and $p_{k_0k_1}$ are
omitted.
$\widetilde J\left(\left|\mathbf{x}-\mathbf{x}^\prime\right|\right)
\equiv J_0^{-1}J\left(\left|\mathbf{x}-\mathbf{x}^\prime\right|\right)$.
Combining expressions of the left-hand and right-hand sides of
Eqs. (\ref{eq:dudt}) and (\ref{eq:dpdt}), we should obtain
Eqs. (\ref{eq:dukkdt}) and (\ref{eq:dpkkdt}).
Eq. (\ref{eq:dBdt}) can be obtained easily by substituting
Eq. (\ref{eq:uk}) into Eq. (\ref{dBdt}) and making use
of the orthogonality of $\psi_{k_i}\left(\xi_i\right)$'s.
\subsection{\label{subsec:moving_std} Stability of Moving Bumps on 2D CANNs with STD}
To study the stability issue, let us define
\begin{align}
F\left(\widetilde{u}_{00},\cdots,p_{00},\cdots,B|\widetilde{u}_{k_{0}k_{1}}\right) \equiv &~ -\widetilde{u}_{k_{0}k_{1}}
+\frac{\tau_{s}c_0}{2a}\left[\sqrt{k_{0}+1}\widetilde{u}_{k_{0}+1,k_{1}}-\sqrt{k_{0}}\widetilde{u}_{k_{0}-1,k_{1}}\right]\nonumber \\
&~ +\frac{\tau_{s}c_1}{2a}\left[\sqrt{k_{1}+1}\widetilde{u}_{k_{0},k_{1}+1}-\sqrt{k_{1}}\widetilde{u}_{k_{0},k_{1}-1}\right]\nonumber \\
&~ +\frac{1}{B}\sum_{n_{0}n_{1}m_{0}m_{1}}C_{n_{0}m_{0}}^{k_{0}}C_{n_{1}m_{1}}^{k_{1}}\widetilde{u}_{n_{0}n_{1}}\widetilde{u}_{m_{0}m_{1}}\nonumber \\
&~ -\frac{1}{B}\sum_{n_{0}n_{1}m_{0}m_{1}l_{0}l_{1}}D_{n_{0}m_{0}l_{0}}^{k_{0}}D_{n_{1}m_{1}l_{1}}^{k_{1}}\widetilde{u}_{n_{0}n_{1}}\widetilde{u}_{m_{0}m_{1}}p_{l_{0}l_{1}}, \nonumber \\ \\
F\left(\widetilde{u}_{00},\cdots,p_{00},\cdots,B|p_{k_{0}k_{1}}\right) \equiv &~ \frac{\tau_s}{\tau_d} \Biggl\{ -p_{k_{0}k_{1}} \Biggr.\nonumber \\
&~+\frac{\tau_{d}c_0}{\sqrt{2}a}\left[\sqrt{k_{0}+1}p_{k_{0}+1,k_{1}}-\sqrt{k_{0}}p_{k_{0}-1,k_{1}}\right]\nonumber \\
&~+\frac{\tau_{d}c_1}{\sqrt{2}a}\left[\sqrt{k_{1}+1}p_{k_{0},k_{1}+1}-\sqrt{k_{1}}p_{k_{0},k_{1}-1}\right]\nonumber \\
&~ +\frac{\widetilde{\beta}}{B}\sum_{n_{0}n_{1}m_{0}m_{1}}E_{n_{0}m_{0}}^{k_{0}}E_{n_{1}m_{1}}^{k_{1}}\widetilde{u}_{n_{0}n_{1}}\widetilde{u}_{m_{0}m_{1}}\nonumber \\
&~ \Biggl.-\frac{\widetilde{\beta}}{B}\sum_{n_{0}n_{1}m_{0}m_{1}l_{0}l_{1}}F_{n_{0}m_{0}l_{0}}^{k_{0}}F_{n_{1}m_{1}l_{1}}^{k_{1}}\widetilde{u}_{n_{0}n_{1}}\widetilde{u}_{m_{0}m_{1}}p_{l_{0}l_{1}}\Biggr\}, \nonumber \\ \\
F\left(\widetilde{u}_{00},\cdots,p_{00},\cdots,B|B\right) \equiv &~
\frac{\tau_s}{\tau_B}\Biggl(-B+1+\frac{1}{32\pi a^{2}}\widetilde{k}\sum_{k_{0}k_{1}}\widetilde{u}_{k_{0}k_{1}}^{2}\Biggr).
\end{align}
The stability of fixed point solutions can be determined by
considering the stability matrix given by
\begin{align}
& ~ \mathscr{A}_{\rm STD}^{\rm moving} \nonumber \\
\equiv & ~
\left(\begin{array}{ccccc}
\frac{\partial F\left(\widetilde{u}_{00},\cdots,p_{00},\cdots,B|\widetilde{u}_{00}\right)}{\partial\widetilde{u}_{00}} & \cdots & \frac{\partial F\left(\widetilde{u}_{00},\cdots,p_{00},\cdots,B|\widetilde{u}_{00}\right)}{\partial p_{00}} & \cdots & \frac{\partial F\left(\widetilde{u}_{00},\cdots,p_{00},\cdots,B|\widetilde{u}_{00}\right)}{\partial B}\\
\vdots & \ddots & \vdots & \ddots & \vdots\\
\frac{\partial F\left(\widetilde{u}_{00},\cdots,p_{00},\cdots,B|p_{00}\right)}{\partial\widetilde{u}_{00}} & \cdots & \frac{\partial F\left(\widetilde{u}_{00},\cdots,p_{00},\cdots,B|p_{00}\right)}{\partial p_{00}} & \cdots & \frac{\partial F\left(\widetilde{u}_{00},\cdots,p_{00},\cdots,B|p_{00}\right)}{\partial B}\\
\vdots & \ddots & \vdots & \ddots & \vdots\\
\frac{\partial F\left(\widetilde{u}_{00},\cdots,p_{00},\cdots,B|B\right)}{\partial\widetilde{u}_{00}} & \cdots & \frac{\partial F\left(\widetilde{u}_{00},\cdots,p_{00},\cdots,B|B\right)}{\partial p_{00}} & \cdots & \frac{\partial F\left(\widetilde{u}_{00},\cdots,p_{00},\cdots,B|B\right)}{\partial B}
\end{array}\right). \nonumber \\
\end{align}
For dynamical variables near their fixed point solutions, we let
\begin{align}
\widetilde{u}_{k_{0}k_{1}}\left(t\right) \equiv & ~ \widetilde{u}_{k_{0}k_{1}}^{*}+\delta\widetilde{u}_{k_{0}k_{1}}\left(t\right),\\
p_{k_{0}k_{1}}\left(t\right) \equiv & ~ p_{k_{0}k_{1}}^{*}+\delta p_{k_{0}k_{1}}\left(t\right),\\
B\left(t\right) \equiv & ~ B^{*}+\delta B\left(t\right),
\end{align}
where $\widetilde{u}_{k_{0}k_{1}}^{*}$, $p_{k_{0}k_{1}}^{*}$ and $B^{*}$ is
the fixed point solution. Then the dynamics of $\delta\widetilde{u}_{k_{0}k_{1}}\left(t\right)$, $\delta p_{k_{0}k_{1}}\left(t\right)$ and $\delta B\left(t\right)$ can be formulated as
\begin{equation}
\tau_s \frac{d}{dt}
\left(\begin{array}{c}
\delta\widetilde{u}_{00}\left(t\right) \\
\vdots \\
\delta p_{00}\left(t\right) \\
\vdots \\
\delta B\left(t\right)
\end{array}\right)
=
\mathscr{A}_{\rm STD}^{\rm moving}
\left(\begin{array}{c}
\delta\widetilde{u}_{00}\left(t\right) \\
\vdots \\
\delta p_{00}\left(t\right) \\
\vdots \\
\delta B\left(t\right)
\end{array}\right).
\end{equation}
The fixed point solution is stable only if the maximum of the
real parts of eigenvalues of \\$
\left.\mathscr{A}_{\rm STD}^{\rm moving}\right|_{
\widetilde u_{00}^{*},\dots,p_{00}^{*},\dots,B^*
}$ is non-positive. In general, those eigenvalues can only be
calculated by numerical methods. The predicted phase boundary
separating the moving and silent phases shown in
Figure \ref{fig:phase_diagram_std} can be deduced, and the prediction
can be verified by simulations.
\subsection{\label{subsec:static_sub} Amplitudal Stability of Bumps on 2D CANNs with SFA}
For our convenience we define
\begin{align}
K_{\widetilde{u}_{00}}\left(\widetilde u_{00},\widetilde v_{00}, B\right)
\equiv & ~ -\widetilde u_{00} + \frac{1}{2}
\frac{\widetilde u_{00}^2}{B} - \widetilde{v}_{00},\\
K_{\widetilde{v}_{00}}\left(\widetilde u_{00},\widetilde v_{00}, B\right)
\equiv & ~ \frac{\tau_s}{\tau_i}\left(-\widetilde{v}_{00} + \gamma \widetilde{u}_{00}\right), \\
K_{B}\left(\widetilde u_{00},\widetilde v_{00}, B\right)
\equiv & ~ \frac{\tau_s}{\tau_i}\left(-B + 1 + \frac{1}{16}\widetilde k \widetilde u_{00}^2\right).
\end{align}
Then the stability matrix is given by
\begin{align}
\mathscr{A}_{\rm SFA} = & ~
\left(\begin{array}{ccc}
\frac{\partial K_{\widetilde{u}_{00}}\left(\widetilde u_{00},\widetilde v_{00}, B\right)}{\partial \widetilde u_{00}} &
\frac{\partial K_{\widetilde{u}_{00}}\left(\widetilde u_{00},\widetilde v_{00}, B\right)}{\partial \widetilde v_{00}} &
\frac{\partial K_{\widetilde{u}_{00}}\left(\widetilde u_{00},\widetilde v_{00}, B\right)}{\partial B} \\
\frac{\partial K_{\widetilde{v}_{00}}\left(\widetilde u_{00},\widetilde v_{00}, B\right)}{\partial \widetilde u_{00}} &
\frac{\partial K_{\widetilde{v}_{00}}\left(\widetilde u_{00},\widetilde v_{00}, B\right)}{\partial \widetilde v_{00}} &
\frac{\partial K_{\widetilde{v}_{00}}\left(\widetilde u_{00},\widetilde v_{00}, B\right)}{\partial B} \\
\frac{\partial K_{B}\left(\widetilde u_{00},\widetilde v_{00}, B\right)}{\partial \widetilde u_{00}} &
\frac{\partial K_{B}\left(\widetilde u_{00},\widetilde v_{00}, B\right)}{\partial \widetilde v_{00}} &
\frac{\partial K_{B}\left(\widetilde u_{00},\widetilde v_{00}, B\right)}{\partial B}
\end{array}\right) \nonumber \\
= & ~
\left(\begin{array}{ccc}
-1+2\left(1+\gamma\right) & -1 & -2\left(1+\gamma\right)^2 \\
\frac{\tau_s}{\tau_i}\gamma & -\frac{\tau_s}{\tau_i} & 0 \\
\frac{\tau_s}{\tau_B}
\frac{1\pm\sqrt{1-\left(1+\gamma\right)^2\widetilde k}}{2\left(1+\gamma\right)} & 0 & -\frac{\tau_s}{\tau_B}
\end{array}\right)
\end{align}
The dynamics of distortions becomes
\begin{equation}
\tau_s
\frac{d}{dt}
\left(\begin{array}{c}
\delta\widetilde u_{00}\left(t\right) \\
\delta\widetilde v_{00}\left(t\right) \\
\delta B \left(t\right)
\end{array}\right)
=
\mathscr{A}_{\rm SFA}
\left(\begin{array}{c}
\delta\widetilde u_{00}\left(t\right) \\
\delta\widetilde v_{00}\left(t\right) \\
\delta B \left(t\right)
\end{array}\right)
\end{equation}
If real parts of all eigenvalues of $\mathscr{A}_{\rm SFA}$ are
non-positive, the static fixed point solution is stable. For the
$\mathscr{A}_{\rm SFA}$ in Eq. (\ref{eq:trans_stable_sub}), since
symmetric terms and asymmetric terms are uncoupled for static bumps,
that $\mathscr{A}_{\rm SFA}$ is the same as the matrix we have shown in
this section.
\subsection{\label{subsec:moving_Cknm_sub} Recurrence Relation of $C^k_{nm}$ for CANNs with SFA}
We have defined $C_{nm}^k$ in Eq. (\ref{eq:Cknm_sub}).
\begin{align}
C_{nm}^{k} \equiv & ~ \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}a}\int dx\psi_{k}\left(x\right)\int dx'\exp\left[-\frac{\left(x-x'\right)^{2}}{2a^{2}}\right]\psi_{n}\left(x'\right)\psi_{m}\left(x'\right)\\
= & ~ \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}a}A_{k}A_{n}A_{m}\int dx\int dx'H_{k}\left(\frac{x}{a}\right)\exp\left[-\frac{x^{2}}{4a^{2}}\right] \nonumber \\
& ~ \qquad\qquad\qquad\exp\left[-\frac{\left(x-x'\right)^{2}}{2a^{2}}\right]H_{n}\left(\frac{x'}{a}\right)H_{m}\left(\frac{x'}{a}\right)\exp\left[-\frac{x'^{2}}{2a^{2}}\right], \nonumber \\
\end{align}
where
\begin{equation}
A_{n}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{\sqrt{2\pi}an!}}.
\end{equation}
To derive the recurrence relations, we first consider
\begin{align}
&~ \int dxH_{k}\left(\frac{x}{a}\right)\exp\left[-\frac{x^{2}}{4a^{2}}\right]\exp\left[-\frac{\left(x-x'\right)^{2}}{2a^{2}}\right]\nonumber\\
= &~ \left(-1\right)^{k}\int dx\exp\left[-\frac{\left(x-x'\right)^{2}}{2a^{2}}\right]\exp\left(\frac{x^{2}}{4a^{2}}\right)\frac{d^{k}}{d\left(\frac{x}{a}\right)^{k}}\exp\left(-\frac{x^{2}}{2a^{2}}\right)\nonumber\\
= &~ \left(-1\right)^{k}a^{k}\int d\left[\frac{d^{k-1}}{dx^{k-1}}\exp\left(-\frac{x^{2}}{2a^{2}}\right)\right]\exp\left[-\frac{\left(x-x'\right)^{2}}{2a^{2}}\right]\exp\left(\frac{x^{2}}{4a^{2}}\right) \nonumber\\
= &~ \left(-1\right)^{k-1}a^{k}\int d\left\{ \exp\left[-\frac{\left(x-x'\right)^{2}}{2a^{2}}+\frac{x^{2}}{4a^{2}}\right]\right\} \frac{d^{k-1}}{dx^{k-1}}\exp\left(-\frac{x^{2}}{2a^{2}}\right)\nonumber\\
= &~ \left(-1\right)^{k-1}a^{k}\int d\left\{ \exp\left[-\frac{1}{4a^{2}}\left(2x^{2}-4xx'+2x'^{2}-x^{2}\right)\right]\right\} \frac{d^{k-1}}{dx^{k-1}}\exp\left(-\frac{x^{2}}{2a^{2}}\right)\nonumber\\
= &~ \left(-1\right)^{k-1}a^{k}\exp\left[\frac{x'^{2}}{2a^{2}}\right]\int d\left\{ \exp\left[-\frac{\left(x-2x'\right)^{2}}{4a^{2}}\right]\right\} \frac{d^{k-1}}{dx^{k-1}}\exp\left(-\frac{x^{2}}{2a^{2}}\right)\nonumber\\
= &~ \left(-1\right)^{k-1}a^{k}\exp\left[\frac{x'^{2}}{2a^{2}}\right]\int dx\frac{d}{dx}\exp\left[-\frac{\left(x-2x'\right)^{2}}{4a^{2}}\right]\frac{d^{k-1}}{dx^{k-1}}\exp\left(-\frac{x^{2}}{2a^{2}}\right)\nonumber\\
= &~ \left(-1\right)^{k}a^{k}\frac{1}{2}\exp\left[\frac{x'^{2}}{2a^{2}}\right]\frac{d}{dx'}\int dx\exp\left[-\frac{\left(x-2x'\right)^{2}}{4a^{2}}\right]\frac{d^{k-1}}{dx^{k-1}}\exp\left(-\frac{x^{2}}{2a^{2}}\right)\nonumber \\
= &~ \left(-1\right)^{k}a^{k}\frac{1}{2}\exp\left[\frac{x'^{2}}{2a^{2}}\right]\frac{d}{dx'}\int d\left[\frac{d^{k-2}}{dx^{k-2}}\exp\left(-\frac{x^{2}}{2a^{2}}\right)\right]\exp\left[-\frac{\left(x-2x'\right)^{2}}{4a^{2}}\right]\nonumber\\
= &~ \left(-1\right)^{k-1}a^{k}\frac{1}{2}\exp\left[\frac{x'^{2}}{2a^{2}}\right]\frac{d}{dx'}\int d\left\{ \exp\left[-\frac{\left(x-2x'\right)^{2}}{4a^{2}}\right]\right\} \frac{d^{k-2}}{dx^{k-2}}\exp\left(-\frac{x^{2}}{2a^{2}}\right)\nonumber\\
= &~ \left(-1\right)^{k}a^{k}\frac{1}{2^{2}}\exp\left[\frac{x'^{2}}{2a^{2}}\right]\frac{d^{2}}{dx'^{2}}\int d\exp\left[-\frac{\left(x-2x'\right)^{2}}{4a^{2}}\right]\frac{d^{k-2}}{dx^{k-2}}\exp\left(-\frac{x^{2}}{2a^{2}}\right)\nonumber\\
&~ \vdots\nonumber\\
= &~ \left(-1\right)^{k}a^{k}\frac{1}{2^{k}}\exp\left[\frac{x'^{2}}{2a^{2}}\right]\frac{d^{k}}{dx'^{k}}\int d\exp\left[-\frac{\left(x-2x'\right)^{2}}{4a^{2}}\right]\exp\left(-\frac{x^{2}}{2a^{2}}\right)\nonumber\\
= &~ \left(-1\right)^{k}a^{k}\frac{1}{2^{k}}\sqrt{\frac{4\pi}{3}}a\exp\left[\frac{x'^{2}}{2a^{2}}\right]\frac{d^{k}}{dx'^{k}}\exp\left[-\frac{2x'^{2}}{3a^{2}}\right]\nonumber\\
= &~ \left(-1\right)^{k}a^{k}\frac{1}{2^{k}}\sqrt{\frac{4\pi}{3}}a\exp\left[\frac{x'^{2}}{2a^{2}}\right]\frac{d^{k}}{dx'^{k}}\exp\left[-\frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{2x}{\sqrt{3}a}\right)^{2}\right]\nonumber\\
= &~ \left(-1\right)^{k}a^{k}\frac{1}{2^{k}}\sqrt{\frac{4\pi}{3}}a\left(\frac{2}{\sqrt{3}a}\right)^{k}\exp\left[\frac{x'^{2}}{2a^{2}}-\frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{2x'}{\sqrt{3}a}\right)^{2}\right]\nonumber\\
&~ \qquad\qquad\qquad\exp\left[\frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{2x'}{\sqrt{3}a}\right)^{2}\right]\frac{d^{k}}{d\left(\frac{2x'}{\sqrt{3}a}\right)^{k}}\exp\left[-\frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{2x'}{\sqrt{3}a}\right)^{2}\right]\nonumber\\
= &~ \frac{2\sqrt{\pi}a}{3^{\frac{k+1}{2}}}\exp\left(-\frac{x'^{2}}{6a^{2}}\right)H_{k}\left(\frac{2x'}{\sqrt{3}a}\right).
\end{align}
Here we obtain this identity by using multiple integration by parts. Then, we have
\begin{align}
{C}_{nm}^{k} = &~ \frac{\sqrt{2}}{3^{\frac{k+1}{2}}}A_{k}A_{n}A_{m}\int dx'\exp\left(-\frac{2x'^{2}}{3a^{2}}\right)H_{k}\left(\frac{2x'}{\sqrt{3}a}\right)H_{n}\left(\frac{x'}{a}\right)H_{m}\left(\frac{x'}{a}\right)\nonumber \\
= &~ \frac{\sqrt{2}}{3^{\frac{k+1}{2}}}\frac{1}{\left(2\pi\right)^{\frac{3}{4}}a^{\frac{3}{2}}\sqrt{k!n!m!}}\int dx\exp\left(-\frac{2x^{2}}{3a^{2}}\right)H_{k}\left(\frac{2x}{\sqrt{3}a}\right)H_{n}\left(\frac{x}{a}\right)H_{m}\left(\frac{x}{a}\right). \nonumber \\
\end{align}
To relate $C_{nm}^k$ and $C_{n^\prime m^\prime}^{k^\prime}$ we need to use the recursion
relations of probabilist's Hermite polynomials:
\begin{align}
H_{n+1}\left(x\right) = & ~ xH_{n}\left(x\right)-H_{n}'\left(x\right)\text{ and }\\
H_{n}'\left(x\right) = & ~ nH_{n-1}\left(x\right).
\end{align}
Then we can derive
\begin{align}
{C}_{nm}^{k} = &~ \frac{\sqrt{2}}{3^{\frac{k+1}{2}}}\frac{1}{\left(2\pi\right)^{\frac{3}{4}}a^{\frac{3}{2}}\sqrt{k!n!m!}}\int dx\exp\left(-\frac{2x^{2}}{3a^{2}}\right)H_{k}\left(\frac{2x}{\sqrt{3}a}\right)H_{n}\left(\frac{x}{a}\right)H_{m}\left(\frac{x}{a}\right)\nonumber \\
= &~ \frac{\sqrt{2}}{3^{\frac{k+1}{2}}}\frac{1}{\left(2\pi\right)^{\frac{3}{4}}a^{\frac{3}{2}}\sqrt{k!n!m!}}\nonumber \\
&~ \quad\int dx\exp\left(-\frac{2x^{2}}{3a^{2}}\right)\left[\frac{2x}{\sqrt{3}a}H_{k-1}\left(\frac{2x}{\sqrt{3}a}\right)-\left(k-1\right)H_{k-2}\left(\frac{2x}{\sqrt{3}a}\right)\right] \nonumber \\
&~ \quad \quad \quad\quad \quad \quad\quad \quad \quad H_{n}\left(\frac{x}{a}\right)H_{m}\left(\frac{x}{a}\right)\nonumber \\
= &~ \frac{\sqrt{2}}{3^{\frac{k+1}{2}}}\frac{1}{\left(2\pi\right)^{\frac{3}{4}}a^{\frac{3}{2}}\sqrt{k!n!m!}}\int dx\exp\left(-\frac{2x^{2}}{3a^{2}}\right)\frac{2x}{\sqrt{3}a}\nonumber \\
&~ \quad \quad \quad\quad \quad \quad\quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad H_{k-1}\left(\frac{2x}{\sqrt{3}a}\right)H_{n}\left(\frac{x}{a}\right)H_{m}\left(\frac{x}{a}\right)\nonumber \\
&~ -\frac{\sqrt{2}}{3^{\frac{k+1}{2}}}\frac{1}{\left(2\pi\right)^{\frac{3}{4}}a^{\frac{3}{2}}\sqrt{k!n!m!}}\int dx\exp\left(-\frac{2x^{2}}{3a^{2}}\right)\left(k-1\right) \nonumber \\
&~\quad \quad \quad\quad \quad \quad\quad \quad \quad\quad \quad \quad H_{k-2}\left(\frac{2x}{\sqrt{3}a}\right)H_{n}\left(\frac{x}{a}\right)H_{m}\left(\frac{x}{a}\right)\nonumber \\
= &~ -\frac{1}{3}\sqrt{\frac{k-1}{k}}{C}_{nm}^{k-2}+\frac{\sqrt{2}}{3^{\frac{k+1}{2}}}\frac{1}{\left(2\pi\right)^{\frac{3}{4}}a^{\frac{3}{2}}\sqrt{k!n!m!}}\left(-\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}a\right)\nonumber \\
&~ \quad\int d\left[\exp\left(-\frac{2x^{2}}{3a^{2}}\right)\right]H_{k-1}\left(\frac{2x}{\sqrt{3}a}\right)H_{n}\left(\frac{x}{a}\right)H_{m}\left(\frac{x}{a}\right)\nonumber \\
= &~ -\frac{1}{3}\sqrt{\frac{k-1}{k}}{C}_{nm}^{k-2}+\frac{\sqrt{2}}{3^{\frac{k+1}{2}}}\frac{1}{\left(2\pi\right)^{\frac{3}{4}}a^{\frac{3}{2}}\sqrt{k!n!m!}}\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}a\nonumber \\
&~ \quad\int dx\exp\left(-\frac{2x^{2}}{3a^{2}}\right)\left[H_{k-1}'\left(\frac{2x}{\sqrt{3}a}\right)H_{n}\left(\frac{x}{a}\right)H_{m}\left(\frac{x}{a}\right)\frac{2}{\sqrt{3}a}\right.\nonumber \\
&~ \quad \quad \quad\quad \quad \quad\quad \quad \quad+H_{k-1}\left(\frac{2x}{\sqrt{3}a}\right)H_{n}'\left(\frac{x}{a}\right)H_{m}\left(\frac{x}{a}\right)\frac{1}{a}\nonumber\\
&~ \left.\quad \quad \quad\quad \quad\quad \quad \quad \quad +H_{k-1}\left(\frac{2x}{\sqrt{3}a}\right)H_{n}\left(\frac{x}{a}\right)H_{m}'\left(\frac{x}{a}\right)\frac{1}{a}\right]\nonumber \\
= &~ -\frac{1}{3}\sqrt{\frac{k-1}{k}}{C}_{nm}^{k-2}+\frac{1}{3}\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}a\frac{2}{\sqrt{3}a}\frac{k-1}{\sqrt{k\left(k-1\right)}}{C}_{nm}^{k-2}\nonumber \\
&~ \quad \quad \quad +\frac{1}{\sqrt{3}}\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}a\frac{1}{a}\frac{n}{\sqrt{kn}}{C}_{n-1,m}^{k-1}+\frac{1}{\sqrt{3}}\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}a\frac{1}{a}\frac{m}{\sqrt{km}}{C}_{n,m-1}^{k-1}\nonumber \\
= &~ \frac{1}{2}\sqrt{\frac{n}{k}}{C}_{n-1,m}^{k-1}+\frac{1}{2}\sqrt{\frac{m}{k}}{C}_{n,m-1}^{k-1}\label{eq:C_nmk_k_iter}
\end{align}
Also,
\begin{align}
{C}_{nm}^{k} = &~ \frac{\sqrt{2}}{3^{\frac{k+1}{2}}}\frac{1}{\left(2\pi\right)^{\frac{3}{4}}a^{\frac{3}{2}}\sqrt{k!n!m!}}\nonumber \\
&~ \quad\int dx\exp\left(-\frac{2x^{2}}{3a^{2}}\right)H_{k}\left(\frac{2x}{\sqrt{3}a}\right)\left[\frac{x}{a}H_{n-1}\left(\frac{x}{a}\right)-H_{n-1}'\left(\frac{x}{a}\right)\right]H_{m}\left(\frac{x}{a}\right)\nonumber \\
= &~ \frac{\sqrt{2}}{3^{\frac{k+1}{2}}}\frac{1}{\left(2\pi\right)^{\frac{3}{4}}a^{\frac{3}{2}}\sqrt{k!n!m!}}\int dx\exp\left(-\frac{2x^{2}}{3a^{2}}\right)H_{k}\left(\frac{2x}{\sqrt{3}a}\right)\nonumber \\
&~ \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \left[\frac{x}{a}H_{n-1}\left(\frac{x}{a}\right)-\left(n-1\right)H_{n-2}\left(\frac{x}{a}\right)\right]H_{m}\left(\frac{x}{a}\right)\nonumber \\
= &~ \frac{\sqrt{2}}{3^{\frac{k+1}{2}}}\frac{1}{\left(2\pi\right)^{\frac{3}{4}}a^{\frac{3}{2}}\sqrt{k!n!m!}}\int dx\frac{x}{a}\exp\left(-\frac{2x^{2}}{3a^{2}}\right)\nonumber \\
&~ \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad H_{k}\left(\frac{2x}{\sqrt{3}a}\right) H_{n-1}\left(\frac{x}{a}\right)H_{m}\left(\frac{x}{a}\right)\nonumber \\
&~ -\frac{\sqrt{2}}{3^{\frac{k+1}{2}}}\frac{1}{\left(2\pi\right)^{\frac{3}{4}}a^{\frac{3}{2}}\sqrt{k!n!m!}}\left(n-1\right)\int dx\exp\left(-\frac{2x^{2}}{3a^{2}}\right) \nonumber \\
&~ \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad H_{k}\left(\frac{2x}{\sqrt{3}a}\right)H_{n-2}\left(\frac{x}{a}\right)H_{m}\left(\frac{x}{a}\right)\nonumber \\
= &~ -\sqrt{\frac{n-1}{n}}{C}_{n-2,m}^{k}+\frac{\sqrt{2}}{3^{\frac{k+1}{2}}}\frac{1}{\left(2\pi\right)^{\frac{3}{4}}a^{\frac{3}{2}}\sqrt{k!n!m!}}\left(-\frac{3a}{4}\right)\nonumber \\
&~ \quad\int d\left[\exp\left(-\frac{2x^{2}}{3a^{2}}\right)\right]H_{k}\left(\frac{2x}{\sqrt{3}a}\right)H_{n-1}\left(\frac{x}{a}\right)H_{m}\left(\frac{x}{a}\right)\nonumber \\
= &~ -\sqrt{\frac{n-1}{n}}{C}_{n-2,m}^{k}+\frac{\sqrt{2}}{3^{\frac{k+1}{2}}}\frac{1}{\left(2\pi\right)^{\frac{3}{4}}a^{\frac{3}{2}}\sqrt{k!n!m!}}\left(\frac{3a}{4}\right)\nonumber \\
&~ \quad\int dx\exp\left(-\frac{2x^{2}}{3a^{2}}\right)\left[H_{k}'\left(\frac{2x}{\sqrt{3}a}\right)H_{n-1}\left(\frac{x}{a}\right)H_{m}\left(\frac{x}{a}\right)\frac{2}{\sqrt{3}a}\right.\nonumber \\
&~\quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad +H_{k}\left(\frac{2x}{\sqrt{3}a}\right)H_{n-1}'\left(\frac{x}{a}\right)H_{m}\left(\frac{x}{a}\right)\frac{1}{a} \nonumber \\
&~ \quad \quad \quad \quad\quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \left. +H_{k}\left(\frac{2x}{\sqrt{3}a}\right)H_{n-1}\left(\frac{x}{a}\right)H_{m}'\left(\frac{x}{a}\right)\frac{1}{a}\right] \nonumber \\
= &~ -\sqrt{\frac{n-1}{n}}{C}_{n-2,m}^{k}+\frac{1}{\sqrt{3}}\frac{3a}{4}\frac{2}{\sqrt{3}a}\frac{k}{\sqrt{kn}}{C}_{n-1,m}^{k-1}\nonumber \\
&~ \qquad+\frac{3a}{4}\frac{1}{a}\frac{n-1}{\sqrt{n\left(n-1\right)}}{C}_{n-2,m}^{k}+\frac{3a}{4}\frac{1}{a}\frac{m}{\sqrt{nm}}{C}_{n-1,m-1}^{k}\nonumber \\
= &~ -\frac{1}{4}\sqrt{\frac{n-1}{n}}{C}_{n-2,m}^{k}+\frac{1}{2}\sqrt{\frac{k}{n}}{C}_{n-1,m}^{k-1}+\frac{3}{4}\sqrt{\frac{m}{n}}{C}_{n-1,m-1}^{k}\label{eq:C_nmk_n_iter}\\
{C}_{nm}^{k} = &~ -\frac{1}{4}\sqrt{\frac{m-1}{m}}{C}_{n,m-2}^{k}+\frac{1}{2}\sqrt{\frac{k}{m}}{C}_{n,m-1}^{k-1}+\frac{3}{4}\sqrt{\frac{n}{m}}{C}_{n-1,m-1}^{k}\label{eq:C_nmk_m_iter}
\end{align}
For $k=m=n=0$, we have
\begin{align}
{C}_{00}^{0} = &~ \frac{\sqrt{2}}{\sqrt{3}}\frac{1}{\left(2\pi\right)^{\frac{3}{4}}a^{\frac{3}{2}}}\int dx\exp\left(-\frac{2x^{2}}{3a^{2}}\right)\nonumber \\
= &~ \frac{\sqrt{2}}{\sqrt{3}}\frac{1}{\left(2\pi\right)^{\frac{3}{4}}a^{\frac{3}{2}}}\sqrt{\frac{3\pi a^{2}}{2}}\nonumber \\
= &~ \frac{1}{\sqrt{\sqrt{8\pi}a}}
\end{align}
By using Eqs. (\ref{eq:C_nmk_k_iter}), (\ref{eq:C_nmk_n_iter}) and
(\ref{eq:C_nmk_m_iter}) and $C_{00}^0$, we can generate any
$C_{nm}^k$ needed for numerical computations.
\subsection{\label{subsec:moving_speed_sub} Intrinsic Speed of Moving Bumps on 2D CANNs with SFA}
Here we consider terms up to $k_0 + k_1 = 2$. And for simplicity
we assume
$\mathbf{c} = \left(c_0,c_1\right) = \left(c,0\right)$. Then,
\begin{align}
u\left(\boldsymbol{\xi},t\right) \approx &~ \sum_{k_{0}+k_{1}\le2}u_{k_{0}k_{1}}\left(t\right)\psi_{k_{0}}\left(\xi_{0}\right)\psi_{k_{1}}\left(\xi_{1}\right) \nonumber \\
= &~ u_{00}\left(t\right)\psi_{0}\left(\xi_{0}\right)\psi_{0}\left(\xi_{1}\right) \nonumber \\
&~ +u_{02}\left(t\right)\psi_{0}\left(\xi_{0}\right)\psi_{2}\left(\xi_{1}\right)+u_{20}\left(t\right)\psi_{2}\left(\xi_{0}\right)\psi_{0}\left(\xi_{1}\right),\\
v\left(\boldsymbol{\xi},t\right) = &~ v_{00}\left(t\right)\psi_{0}\left(\xi_{0}\right)\psi_{0}\left(\xi_{1}\right)+v_{10}\left(t\right)\psi_{1}\left(\xi_{0}\right)\psi_{0}\left(\xi_{1}\right) \nonumber \\
&~ +v_{02}\left(t\right)\psi_{0}\left(\xi_{0}\right)\psi_{2}\left(\xi_{1}\right)+v_{20}\left(t\right)\psi_{2}\left(\xi_{0}\right)\psi_{0}\left(\xi_{1}\right).
\end{align}
Note that, since $c_1=0$, terms that are asymmetric along
the $\xi_1$-direction are dropped.
The derived speed should be applicable to
any direction because the model is homogeneous.
By projection and orthogonality of the basis functions,
Eqs. (\ref{eq:dudt}) and (\ref{eq:dvdt_sub}) give
\begin{align}
0 = &~ -\widetilde{u}_{00}-\widetilde{v}_{00}\nonumber \\
&~ +\frac{1}{B}\left(C_{00}^{0}\right)^{2}\widetilde{u}_{00}^{2}+\frac{1}{B}C_{00}^{0}C_{22}^{0}\widetilde{u}_{02}^{2}+\frac{1}{B}C_{22}^{0}C_{00}^{0}\widetilde{u}_{20}^{2}\nonumber \\
&~ +2\frac{1}{B}C_{00}^{0}C_{02}^{0}\widetilde{u}_{00}\widetilde{u}_{02}+2\frac{1}{B}C_{02}^{0}C_{00}^{0}\widetilde{u}_{00}\widetilde{u}_{20}+2\frac{1}{B}\left(C_{02}^{0}\right)^{2}\widetilde{u}_{02}\widetilde{u}_{20}\\
0 = &~ \widetilde{v}_{10}+\frac{\tau_{s}c}{2a}\left(\sqrt{1}\widetilde{u}_{00}-\sqrt{2}\widetilde{u}_{20}\right)\label{eq:App_F_7}\\
0 = &~ -\widetilde{u}_{02}-\widetilde{v}_{02}+\frac{1}{B}C_{00}^{0}C_{00}^{2}\widetilde{u}_{00}^{2}+\frac{1}{B}C_{00}^{0}C_{22}^{2}\widetilde{u}_{02}^{2}+\frac{1}{B}C_{22}^{0}C_{00}^{2}\widetilde{u}_{20}^{2}\nonumber \\
&~ +2\frac{1}{B}C_{00}^{0}C_{02}^{2}\widetilde{u}_{00}\widetilde{u}_{02}+2\frac{1}{B}C_{02}^{0}C_{00}^{2}\widetilde{u}_{00}\widetilde{u}_{20}\nonumber \\
&~ +2\frac{1}{B}C_{02}^{0}C_{20}^{2}\widetilde{u}_{02}\widetilde{u}_{20}\\
0 = &~ -\widetilde{u}_{20}-\widetilde{v}_{20}+\frac{1}{B}C_{00}^{2}C_{00}^{0}\widetilde{u}_{00}^{2}+\frac{1}{B}C_{00}^{2}C_{22}^{0}\widetilde{u}_{02}^{2}+\frac{1}{B}C_{22}^{2}C_{00}^{0}\widetilde{u}_{20}^{2}\nonumber \\
&~ +2\frac{1}{B}C_{00}^{2}C_{02}^{0}\widetilde{u}_{00}\widetilde{u}_{02}+2\frac{1}{B}C_{02}^{2}C_{00}^{0}\widetilde{u}_{00}\widetilde{u}_{20}\nonumber \\
&~ +2\frac{1}{B}C_{02}^{2}C_{20}^{0}\widetilde{u}_{02}\widetilde{u}_{20}\\
0 = &~ -\widetilde{v}_{00}+\gamma\widetilde{u}_{00}+\frac{\tau_{i}c}{2a}\widetilde{v}_{10} \label{eq:App_F_10}\\
0 = &~ -\widetilde{v}_{10}-\frac{\tau_{i}c}{2a}\left(\sqrt{1}\widetilde{v}_{00}-\sqrt{2}\widetilde{v}_{20}\right) \label{eq:App_F_11}\\
0 = &~ -\widetilde{v}_{02}+\gamma\widetilde{u}_{02} \label{eq:App_F_12}\\
0 = &~ -\widetilde{v}_{20}+\gamma\widetilde{u}_{20}-\frac{\tau_{i}c}{2a}\left(\sqrt{2}\widetilde{v}_{10}\right)\label{eq:App_F_13}
\end{align}
From these equations we can deduce the ratio between
$\widetilde{u}_{00}-\sqrt{2}\widetilde{u}_{20}$
and $\widetilde{v}_{00}-\sqrt{2}\widetilde{v}_{20}$
\begin{align}
0 = & ~ \widetilde{v}_{10}+\frac{\tau_{s}c}{2a}\left(\widetilde{u}_{00}-\sqrt{2}\widetilde{u}_{20}\right)\nonumber \\
0 = & ~ \widetilde{v}_{10}+\frac{\tau_{i}c}{2a}\left(\widetilde{v}_{00}-\sqrt{2}\widetilde{v}_{20}\right) \nonumber\\
\Rightarrow \widetilde{v}_{00}-\sqrt{2}\widetilde{v}_{20} = & ~ \frac{\tau_{s}}{\tau_{i}}\left(\widetilde{u}_{00}-\sqrt{2}\widetilde{u}_{20}\right)
\end{align}
Combining Eqs. (\ref{eq:App_F_7}), (\ref{eq:App_F_10}) and (\ref{eq:App_F_13}), we have
\begin{align}
\widetilde{v}_{00}-\sqrt{2}\widetilde{v}_{20}-\gamma\left(\widetilde{u}_{00}-\sqrt{2}\widetilde{u}_{20}\right) = &~ 3\frac{\tau_{i}c}{2a}\widetilde{v}_{10}\\
\left(\frac{\tau_{s}}{\tau_{i}}-\gamma\right)\left(\widetilde{u}_{00}-\sqrt{2}\widetilde{u}_{20}\right) = &~ 3\frac{\tau_{i}c}{2a}\widetilde{v}_{10}\\
\frac{\tau_{s}c}{2a} = &~ \pm\frac{\tau_{s}}{\tau_{i}}\sqrt{\frac{1}{3}\left(\frac{\tau_{i}}{\tau_{s}}\gamma-1\right)}\label{eq:intrinsic_speed}
\end{align}
As shown in Figure \ref{fig:sub_c}, this formula can be verified
by simulation.
\subsection{\label{subsec:moving_sub} Stability of Moving Bumps on 2D CANNs with SFA}
Using a method similar to that used in Appendix
\ref{subsec:moving_std}, we define
\begin{align}
K\left(\widetilde{u}_{00},\ldots,B|\widetilde{u}_{k_{0}k_{1}}\right) \equiv &~ -\widetilde{u}_{k_{0}k_{1}}+\frac{1}{B}\sum_{n_{0}m_{0}n_{1}m_{1}}C_{n_{0}m_{0}}^{k_{0}}C_{n_{1}m_{1}}^{k_{1}}\widetilde{u}_{n_{0}n_{1}}\widetilde{u}_{m_{0}m_{1}}-\widetilde{v}_{k_{0}k_{1}}\nonumber \\
&~ -\frac{\tau_{s}c_{0}}{2a}\left(\sqrt{k_{0}}\widetilde{u}_{k_{0}-1,k_{1}}-\sqrt{k_{0}+1}\widetilde{u}_{k_{0}+1,k_{1}}\right)\nonumber \\
&~ -\frac{\tau_{s}c_{1}}{2a}\left(\sqrt{k_{1}}\widetilde{u}_{k_{0},k_{1}-1}-\sqrt{k_{1}+1}\widetilde{u}_{k_{0},k_{1}+1}\right)\\
K\left(\widetilde{u}_{00},\ldots,B|\widetilde{v}_{k_{0}k_{1}}\right) \equiv &~ \frac{\tau_s}{\tau_i} \biggl[-\widetilde{v}_{k_{0}k_{1}}+\gamma\widetilde{u}_{k_{0}k_{1}}\biggr.\nonumber \\
&~-\frac{\tau_{i}c_{0}}{2a}\left(\sqrt{k_{0}}\widetilde{v}_{k_{0}-1,k_{1}}-\sqrt{k_{0}+1}\widetilde{v}_{k_{0}+1,k_{1}}\right)\nonumber \\
&~ \biggl.-\frac{\tau_{i}c_{1}}{2a}\left(\sqrt{k_{1}}\widetilde{v}_{k_{0},k_{1}-1}-\sqrt{k_{1}+1}\widetilde{v}_{k_{0},k_{1}+1}\right)\biggr]\\
K\left(\widetilde{u}_{00},\ldots,B|B\right) \equiv &~ \frac{\tau_s}{\tau_B} \biggl(-B\left(t\right)+1+\frac{1}{32\pi a^{2}}\widetilde{k}\sum_{k_{0}k_{1}}\widetilde{u}_{k_{0}k_{1}}^{2}\biggr).
\end{align}
Then, the matrix concerning the stability issue is
\begin{equation}
\mathscr{A}_{\rm SFA}^{\rm moving}
\equiv
\left(\begin{array}{ccccc}
\frac{\partial K\left(\widetilde{u}_{00},\ldots,B|\widetilde{u}_{00}\right)}{\partial\widetilde{u}_{00}} & \cdots & \frac{\partial K\left(\widetilde{u}_{00},\ldots,B|\widetilde{u}_{00}\right)}{\partial\widetilde{v}_{00}} & \cdots & \frac{\partial K\left(\widetilde{u}_{00},\ldots,B|\widetilde{u}_{00}\right)}{\partial B}\\
\vdots & \ddots & \vdots & \ddots & \vdots\\
\frac{\partial K\left(\widetilde{u}_{00},\ldots,B|\widetilde{v}_{00}\right)}{\partial\widetilde{u}_{00}} & \cdots & \frac{\partial K\left(\widetilde{u}_{00},\ldots,B|\widetilde{v}_{00}\right)}{\partial\widetilde{v}_{00}} & \cdots & \frac{\partial K\left(\widetilde{u}_{00},\ldots,B|\widetilde{v}_{00}\right)}{\partial B}\\
\vdots & \ddots & \vdots & \ddots & \vdots\\
\frac{\partial K\left(\widetilde{u}_{00},\ldots,B|B\right)}{\partial\widetilde{u}_{00}} & \cdots & \frac{\partial K\left(\widetilde{u}_{00},\ldots,B|B\right)}{\partial\widetilde{v}_{00}} & \cdots & \frac{\partial K\left(\widetilde{u}_{00},\ldots,B|B\right)}{\partial B}
\end{array}\right).
\end{equation}
Similarly, the dynamics of distortions is given by
\begin{equation}
\tau_s
\frac{d}{dt}
\left(\begin{array}{c}
\delta \widetilde u_{00}\left(t\right) \\
\vdots \\
\delta \widetilde v_{00}\left(t\right) \\
\vdots \\
\delta B\left(t\right) \\
\end{array}\right)
=\mathscr{A}_{\rm SFA}^{\rm moving}
\left(\begin{array}{c}
\delta \widetilde u_{00}\left(t\right) \\
\vdots \\
\delta \widetilde v_{00}\left(t\right) \\
\vdots \\
\delta B\left(t\right) \\
\end{array}\right),
\end{equation}
Here $\delta \widetilde u_{k_0k_0}\left(t\right)$, $\delta \widetilde v_{k_0k_0}\left(t\right)$ and $\delta B\left(t\right)$ are defined by
\begin{align}
\widetilde u_{k_0k_1}\left(t\right) = &~ \widetilde u_{k_0k_1}^* + \delta \widetilde u_{k_0k_1} \left(t\right), \\
\widetilde v_{k_0k_1}\left(t\right) = &~ \widetilde v_{k_0k_1}^* + \delta \widetilde v_{k_0k_1} \left(t\right), \\
\widetilde B\left(t\right) = &~ B^* + \delta B \left(t\right),
\end{align}
where $\widetilde u_{k_0k_1}^*$, $\widetilde v_{k_0k_1}^*$ and $B^*$ are
the fixed point moving solution to the system.
By calculating eigenvalues of $\mathscr{A}_{\rm SFA}^{\rm moving}$, stability of the fixed point solution can be determined.
|
\section{Introduction}
AWPP is a complexity class introduced by Fenner, Fortnow, Kurtz, and Li~\cite{toolkit}
to understand the structure of counting complexity classes
(see also Refs.~\cite{Li,Fenner}). It is defined as follows:
\begin{definition}
\label{def:AWPP}
A language $L$ is in ${\rm AWPP}$ iff
for any polynomial $r$, there exist $f\in {\rm FP}$ and $g\in {\rm GapP}$ such that
for all $w$, $f(w)>0$ and
\begin{itemize}
\item[1.]
If $w\in L$ then $1-2^{-r(|w|)}\le \frac{g(w)}{f(w)}\le 1$.
\item[2.]
If $w\notin L$ then $0\le \frac{g(w)}{f(w)}\le2^{-r(|w|)}$.
\end{itemize}
Here, ${\rm FP}$ is the class of functions
from bit strings to integers that are computable in polynomial time by a Turing machine.
A ${\rm GapP}$ function~\cite{GapP}
is a function from bit strings to integers that is equal to
the number of accepting paths minus that of rejecting paths of a nondeterministic
Turing machine which takes the bit strings as input.
The FP function $f$ can be replaced with $2^{q(|w|)}$ for a polynomial
$q$~\cite{GapP,Li},
and the error bound $(2^{-r(|w|)},1-2^{-r(|w|)})$ can be replaced with,
for example, $(1/3,2/3)$~\cite{Fenner}.
\end{definition}
Interestingly, AWPP was shown to contain BQP,
by Fortnow and Rogers~\cite{FR} in 1997,
and since then it has been the best upperbound of BQP
(in classical complexity classes).
Here, BQP is a class of problems efficiently solved by a quantum computer:
\begin{definition}
\label{def:BQP}
A language $L$ is in ${\rm BQP}$ iff there exists
a uniform family $V=\{V_n\}_n$ of polynomial-size quantum circuits
such that
\begin{itemize}
\item[1.]
If $w\in L$ then $P_{V_w}(o=1)\ge \frac{2}{3}$.
\item[2.]
If $w\notin L$ then $P_{V_w}(o=1)\le \frac{1}{3}$.
\end{itemize}
Here,
we say that a family $V=\{V_n\}_n$ of quantum circuits is uniform
if there is a classical polynomial-time algorithm that outputs a description of $V_n$
on input $1^n$, where $n$ is the input size of $V_n$.
We denote the output bit by $o\in\{0,1\}$, and
$P_{V_w}(o=1)$ is the probability of obtaining
$o=1$ (i.e., output 1)
if we measure the single output qubit of the circuit $V_{|w|}$ on
input $w$.
The pair of the thresholds $(\frac{1}{3},\frac{2}{3})$ is rather arbitrary.
For example, we can take
$(2^{-r(|w|)},1-2^{-r(|w|)})$ for any polynomial $r$.
\end{definition}
(We note that, for simplicity, we choose Hadamard and Toffoli gates
as a universal gate set of quantum circuits.
This choice is crucial to obtain some of our results, while this choice is also taken
in Ref.~\cite{postBQP}, and we believe that this choice is enough to study
the essential parts of what we are interested in.
It may be possible to extend our results to other gate sets, but it would
be a future research subject.)
The name of AWPP is thus known by many researchers including physicists.
However, the definition of AWPP seems to be somehow artificial and difficult to understand
for ones who are not familiar with GapP functions.
The purpose of the present contribution is to provide a
quantum physical interpretation of AWPP.
For the goal, we consider quantum computing with a postselection.
Here, a postselection is a (fictious) ability that we can choose
an event with probability 1 even if its probability is exponentially small.
Quantum computing with postselection was first considered by Aaronson~\cite{postBQP}.
He defined the following
class postBQP, and showed that it is equal to PP
(see also Ref.~\cite{Kuperberg} and Appendix~\ref{app4} for another proof of
${\rm postBQP}={\rm PP}$):
\begin{definition}
\label{def:postBQP}
A language $L$ is in ${\rm postBQP}$ iff there exist a uniform family $V=\{V_n\}_n$
of polynomial-size quantum circuits with the ability of a postselection
and a polynomial $u$ such that for any input $w$,
\begin{itemize}
\item[1.]
$P_{V_w}(p=1)\ge2^{-u(|w|)}$.
\item[2.]
If $w\in L$ then $P_{V_w}(o=1|p=1)\ge\frac{2}{3}$.
\item[3.]
If $w\notin L$ then $P_{V_w}(o=1|p=1)\le\frac{1}{3}$.
\end{itemize}
Here, $p\in\{0,1\}$ is the measurement result of the postselected qubit of the
circuit $V_{|w|}$, and $P_{V_w}(o=1|p=1)$ is the conditional probability that $V_{|w|}$
on input $w$ obtains $o=1$ under $p=1$.
Like ${\rm BQP}$, the pair of the thresholds $(\frac{1}{3},\frac{2}{3})$ is arbitrary.
In particular, it can be $(2^{-r(|w|)},1-2^{-r(|w|)})$ for any polynomial $r$.
Furthermore, without loss of generality, we can assume that only a single
qubit is postselected, since postselections on more than two qubits
can be transformed to that on a single qubit by using the generalized Toffoli gate,
which can be implemented in a polynomial-size quantum circuit.
\end{definition}
We introduce a restricted version of postBQP, which we call
${\rm postBQP}_{\rm aFP}$:
\begin{definition}
\label{def:postBQP_aFP}
A language $L$ is in ${\rm postBQP}_{\rm aFP}$ iff for any polynomials
$r_1\ge0$ and $r_2\ge0$ there exist
a uniform family $V=\{V_n\}_n$ of polynomial-size quantum circuits with the ability
of a postselection,
an ${\rm FP}$ function $f$,
and a polynomial $q$ such that for any input $w$,
$0<f(w)\le2^{q(|w|)}$
and
\begin{itemize}
\item[1.]
If $w\in L$ then $1-2^{-r_1(|w|)}\le P_{V_w}(o=1|p=1)\le 1$.
\item[2.]
If $w\notin L$ then $0\le P_{V_w}(o=1|p=1)\le 2^{-r_1(|w|)}$.
\item[3.]
$\Big|P_{V_w}(p=1)-\frac{f(w)}{2^{q(|w|)}}\Big|
\le 2^{-r_2(|w|)}P_{V_w}(p=1)$.
\end{itemize}
\end{definition}
The third condition intuitively means that the postselection probability $P_{V_w}(p=1)$
can be approximated to $f(w)/2^{q(|w|)}$
within the multiplicative error $2^{-r_2(|w|)}$.
(Hence the subscript ``aFP" means ``approximately FP".)
We show that ${\rm postBQP}_{\rm aFP}={\rm AWPP}$,
which provides a quantum physical interpretation of
AWPP: AWPP can be considered as an example of
postselected quantum complexity classes.
We note that while one might consider that ${\rm postBQP}_{\rm aFP}$ is also artificial
due to the fiction of postselection, we consider that this class is easier to
understand for physicists since it is defined by using the terminology of
quantum physics, or at least it gives another interpretation of AWPP,
which might be useful for future studies on AWPP.
We also introduce another restricted version of postBQP, which we call
${\rm postBQP}_{\rm asize}$:
\begin{definition}
\label{def:postBQP_asize}
The definition of ${\rm postBQP}_{\rm asize}$ is the same as that
of ${\rm postBQP}_{\rm aFP}$
except that the ${\rm FP}$ function $f(w)$ is replaced with
$g(1^{|w|})$, where $g$ is a ${\rm GapP}$ function.
\end{definition}
We show that ${\rm postBQP}_{\rm asize}$ is equal to the classical
complexity class APP defined by Li~\cite{Li}.
Therefore, not only AWPP but also APP have quantum physical interpretations.
There are some researches
on quantum physical interpretations of classical complexity classes.
For example, the above mentioned
Aaronson's result ${\rm postBQP}={\rm PP}$~\cite{postBQP} is considered
as a quantum physical interpretation of PP.
Furthermore, Kuperberg~\cite{Kuperberg} showed that
${\rm A}_0{\rm PP}$ is equal to ${\rm SBQP}$, which is a quantum version
of SBP~\cite{BGM03},
and Fenner et al.~\cite{NQP} (see also Ref.~\cite{Yamakami}) showed that
${\rm coC}_={\rm P}$ is equal to
NQP, which is a quantum analogue of NP.
Our contributions are in the same line of these researches,
while we take a different way for the proofs.
We not only use the relations between quantum computation and GapP functions
as used in Refs.~\cite{Fenner,NQP}, but combine them with the notion
of restricted postselection probability introduced in this paper.
Moreover, we also use tactically the property that AWPP and APP are closed under
complement in order to satisfy such a restriction of postselection probability.
In addition to
${\rm postBQP}_{\rm aFP}$ and
${\rm postBQP}_{\rm asize}$,
we introduce several restricted versions of postBQP, and study
relations among them and other complexity classes.
For example, we define a simpler version (the exact version) of ${\rm postBQP}_{\rm aFP}$,
which we call ${\rm postBQP}_{\rm FP}$:
\begin{definition}
\label{def:postBQP_FP}
A language $L$ is in ${\rm postBQP}_{\rm FP}$ iff it is in ${\rm postBQP}$
and there exist a polynomial $q$ and $f\in{\rm FP}$ $(f>0)$
such that for any input $w$,
$
P_{V_w}(p=1)=\frac{f(w)}{2^{q(|w|)}},
$
where $V$ is the uniform family of quantum circuits that assures $L\in{\rm postBQP}$.
\end{definition}
Since it is simpler than ${\rm postBQP}_{\rm aFP}$, it would be better if
we could show the equivalence of it to AWPP. Currently, we do not know
whether the equivalence holds. However,
we show that ${\rm postBQP}_{\rm FP}$ sits between WPP and AWPP.
(The definition of WPP is given in Sec.~\ref{pre}.)
It is nearly tight except showing the equivalence since WPP is one of the best
lower bounds of AWPP~\cite{toolkit} (in fact, AWPP was named as ``approximate WPP").
All our results are summarized in Fig.~\ref{suppfig}.
Definitions of new classes in the figure are given in Sec.~\ref{pre}.
A classical analogue of postBQP is ${\rm postBPP}$, which is known
to be equal to ${\rm BPP}_{\rm path}$~\cite{Han}.
We also consider a classical version,
${\rm postBPP}_{\rm FP}$,
of
${\rm postBQP}_{\rm FP}$,
and show that
${\rm UP}\cap{\rm coUP}\subseteq
{\rm postBPP}_{\rm FP}
\subseteq{\rm WAPP}$.
(The definitions of ${\rm postBPP}_{\rm FP}$ and WAPP are given in Sec.~\ref{pre}.)
\begin{figure}[htbp]
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=0.65\textwidth]{figureQIC.eps}
\end{center}
\caption{
Relations among complexity classes studied in this paper.
Dotted lines are known results or inclusions followed
by definitions. Solid lines and all equalities (except
for ${\rm PP}={\rm postBQP}$) are
new results of this paper.}
\label{suppfig}
\end{figure}
\section{Preliminaries}
\label{pre}
In this section, we provide several definitions and facts
used in this paper.
\begin{definition}\cite{GapP}
\label{def:counting_machine}
A counting machine is a nondeterministic Turing machine running in polynomial
time with two halting states, accepting and rejecting, and every computation
path must end in one of these states.
Without loss of generality, we may assume each node of the computation tree
has outdegree at most two.
A counting machine is called normal if for any input each computational path has
the same number of nodes with outdegree two.
\end{definition}
\begin{definition}
\label{def:sharpP}
A function $f:\{0,1\}^*\to {\mathbb N}\cup\{0\}$ is a ${\rm \#P}$ function
if there exists a counting
machine $C$ such that
$f(w)$ is the number of accepting paths of $C(w)$,
where $C(w)$ denotes the
nondeterministic computation of $C$ on input $w$.
\end{definition}
\begin{definition}\cite{GapP}
\label{def:GapP}
A function $f:\{0,1\}^*\to {\mathbb Z}$ is a ${\rm GapP}$ function
if there exists a counting machine $C$
such that
$f(w)$ is the number of accepting paths of $C(w)$
minus the number of rejecting paths of $C(w)$.
\end{definition}
\begin{definition}\cite{Li}
\label{def:APP}
A language $L$ is in ${\rm APP}$ iff for any polynomial $r$, there exist
$f,g\in{\rm GapP}$ such that for all $w$, $f(1^{|w|})>0$ and
\begin{itemize}
\item[1.]
If $w\in L$ then $1-2^{-r(|w|)}\le \frac{g(w)}{f(1^{|w|})}\le 1$.
\item[2.]
If $w\notin L$ then $0\le \frac{g(w)}{f(1^{|w|})}\le 2^{-r(|w|)}$.
\end{itemize}
\end{definition}
\begin{definition}\cite{BGM03}
\label{def:WAPP}
A language $L$ is in ${\rm WAPP}$ iff there exist $g\in{\rm \# P}$, a polynomial $p$,
and a constant $\epsilon>0$ such that
\begin{itemize}
\item[1.]
If $w\in L$ then
$
\frac{1+\epsilon}{2}<\frac{g(w)}{2^{p(|w|)}}\le 1.
$
\item[2.]
If $w\notin L$ then
$
0\le\frac{g(w)}{2^{p(|w|)}}< \frac{1-\epsilon}{2}.
$
\end{itemize}
Note that $2^{p(|w|)}$ can be replaced with an ${\rm FP}$ function $f(w)>0$.
\end{definition}
\begin{definition}\cite{GapP}
\label{def:WPP}
A language $L$ is in ${\rm WPP}$ iff there exist a ${\rm GapP}$ function $g$
and an ${\rm FP}$ function $f$ with $0\notin range(f)$ such that
\begin{itemize}
\item[1.]
If $w\in L$ then $g(w)=f(w)$.
\item[2.]
If $w\notin L$ then $g(w)=0$.
\end{itemize}
\end{definition}
There are relations between an output probability distribution
of a quantum circuit and a ${\rm GapP}$ function.
\begin{theorem}(Fortnow and Rogers~\cite{FR})
For any uniform family $V=\{V_n\}_n$ of polynomial-size quantum circuits,
there exist $g\in{\rm GapP}$ and a polynomial $q$ such that
for any $w$,
$
P_{V_w}(o=1)=\frac{g(w)}{2^{q(|w|)}},
$
where $P_{V_w}(o=1)$ is the probability that the output of
the circuit $V_{|w|}$ is $o=1$ on input $w$.
(Note that this theorem depends on the gate set.
As we have noted, in this paper, we consider the Hadamard and Toffoli gates
as a universal gate set.)
\label{PGapP}
\end{theorem}
\begin{theorem} (Fenner, Green, Homer, and Pruim~\cite{NQP})
For any $g\in{\rm GapP}$, there exist
a polynomial $s$ and
a uniform family
$\{V_n\}_n$
of polynomial-size quantum circuits
such that
$
P_{V_w}(o=1)=\frac{g(w)^2}{2^{s(|w|)}}.
$
\label{GapPP}
\end{theorem}
Now we introduce the restricted postBQP classes other than those
introduced in the previous section.
(Here, $V$ is the uniform family of polynomial-size quantum circuits
that assures $L\in{\rm postBQP}$ as in Definition~\ref{def:postBQP_FP}.)
\begin{definition}
\label{def:postBQP_size}
A language $L$ is in ${\rm postBQP}_{\rm size}$ iff it is in ${\rm postBQP}$ and
$P_{V_w}(p=1)$ depends only on $|w|$.
\end{definition}
From Theorem~\ref{PGapP}, it is an exact version of ${\rm postBQP}_{\rm asize}$.
\begin{definition}
\label{def:postBQP_leexp}
A language $L$ is in ${\rm postBQP}_{\le{\rm exp}}$
iff it is in ${\rm postBQP}$ and there exists a polynomial $q>0$ such that
for any input $w$,
$
P_{V_w}(p=1)\le2^{-q(|w|)}.
$
\end{definition}
\begin{definition}
\label{def:postBQP_exp}
A language $L$ is in ${\rm postBQP}_{\rm exp}$ iff
it is in ${\rm postBQP}$ and there exists a polynomial $q$ such
that for any input $w$,
$
P_{V_w}(p=1)=\frac{1}{2^{q(|w|)}}.
$
\end{definition}
\begin{definition}
\label{def:postBQP_FQP}
A language $L$ is in ${\rm postBQP}_{\rm FQP}$ iff
it is in ${\rm postBQP}$ and there exist a polynomial $q$ and a function
$f:\{0,1\}^*\to{\mathbb N}$, which can be calculated~\footnote{
We assume that $f$ can be calculated without any error.
} by a uniform family
of polynomial-size quantum circuits, such that for any input $w$,
$
P_{V_w}(p=1)=\frac{f(w)}{2^{q(|w|)}}.
$
\end{definition}
We also consider the classical analogue of ${\rm postBQP}_{\rm FP}$.
\begin{definition}
\label{postBPP_FP}
We consider the following polynomial-time probabilistic Turing machine.
\begin{itemize}
\item[1.]
At every nondeterministic step, it makes a random decision between two possibilities,
and each possibility is chosen with probability 1/2.
\item[2.]
The number of random decisions is the same for all computation paths.
\end{itemize}
Therefore, if the machine halts after $t$ nondeterministic steps, the probability of obtaining
a specific computation path is $2^{-t}$.
A language $L$ is in ${\rm postBPP}_{\rm FP}$ iff there exist
a polynomial-time probabilistic Turing machine $V$ that satisfies the above properties
and outputs two bits $p$ and $o$,
an ${\rm FP}$ function $f>0$, a polynomial $q$, and a constant $\epsilon>0$ such that
\begin{itemize}
\item[1.]
$
P_{V_w}(p=1)=\frac{f(w)}{2^{q(|w|)}}.
$
\item[2.]
If $w\in L$ then
$
\frac{1+\epsilon}{2}\le P_{V_w}(o=1|p=1)\le 1.
$
\item[3.]
If $w\notin L$ then
$
0\le P_{V_w}(o=1|p=1)\le \frac{1-\epsilon}{2}.
$
\end{itemize}
Here, $P_{V_w}(p=1)$ and $P_{V_w}(o=1|p=1)$ are defined similarly to the case where
$V$ is a uniform family of circuits.
\end{definition}
\section{Results}
The main result of the present contribution is the following
quantum interpretation of AWPP:
\begin{theorem}
${\rm AWPP}={\rm postBQP}_{\rm aFP}$.
\label{main}
\end{theorem}
The proof is given in Sec.~\ref{proof1}.
By replacing some FP functions in the proof with GapP functions,
we can also show the following quantum interpretation of APP:
\begin{theorem}
\label{main2}
${\rm APP}={\rm postBQP}_{\rm asize}$.
\end{theorem}
The proof is given in Appendix~\ref{app1}.
If we consider not the approximate version, ${\rm postBQP}_{\rm aFP}$,
but the exact version, ${\rm postBQP}_{\rm FP}$, we do not know whether
it is equal to AWPP. Since
${\rm postBQP}_{\rm FP}\subseteq{\rm postBQP}_{\rm aFP}$,
we know
${\rm postBQP}_{\rm FP}\subseteq{\rm AWPP}$.
Furthermore, we can show the following nearly tight lowerbound:
\begin{theorem}
${\rm WPP}\subseteq{\rm postBQP}_{\rm FP}$.
\label{WPPinpostBQP_FP}
\end{theorem}
The proof is given in Appendix~\ref{app2}.
We can also show several relations among
restricted postBQP classes:
\begin{theorem}
\label{postBQPequalpostBQP_leexp}
${\rm postBQP}={\rm postBQP}_{\le {\rm exp}}$.
\end{theorem}
The proof is given in Appendix~\ref{app3}.
\begin{theorem}
${\rm postBQP}_{\rm FP}={\rm postBQP}_{\rm FQP}={\rm postBQP}_{\rm exp}\subseteq
{\rm postBQP}_{\rm size}$.
\label{equivalences}
\end{theorem}
Its proof is given in Sec.~\ref{proof2}.
Finally, we consider the classical analogue, ${\rm postBPP}_{\rm FP}$,
of ${\rm postBQP}_{\rm FP}$, and show the following result:
\begin{theorem}
${\rm UP}\cap{\rm coUP}\subseteq{\rm postBPP}_{\rm FP}\subseteq{\rm WAPP}$.
\label{classical}
\end{theorem}
Its proof is given in Sec.~\ref{proof3}.
Note that the inclusion
${\rm postBPP}_{\rm FP}\subseteq{\rm WAPP}$ is a ``classical analogue"
of
${\rm postBQP}_{\rm FP}\subseteq{\rm AWPP}$, since WAPP
is a ``\#P analogue" of AWPP.
Since ${\rm WAPP}\subseteq{\rm AM}$~\cite{BGM03} and ${\rm BQP}\subseteq{\rm AM}$
is unlikely,
it is also unlikely that ${\rm BQP}\subseteq{\rm postBPP}_{\rm FP}$.
Furthermore, since it is unlikely that BQP contains
${\rm UP}\cap{\rm coUP}$,
the inclusion
${\rm UP}\cap{\rm coUP}\subseteq{\rm postBPP}_{\rm FP}$ suggests that
${\rm postBPP}_{\rm FP}={\rm BPP}$
and
${\rm postBPP}_{\rm FP}\subseteq{\rm BQP}$
are unlikely.
\section{Proof of Theorem \ref{main}}
\label{proof1}
We first show
${\rm AWPP}\cap{\rm coAWPP}\subseteq{\rm postBQP}_{\rm aFP}$.
Since ${\rm AWPP}={\rm coAWPP}$~\cite{Li}, this means
${\rm AWPP}\subseteq{\rm postBQP}_{\rm aFP}$.
Let us assume that a language $L$ is in
${\rm AWPP}\cap{\rm coAWPP}$.
Then, for any polynomial $r$, there exist $g_1,g_2\in {\rm GapP}$
and $f_1,f_2\in{\rm FP}$ ($f_1>0$, $f_2>0$)
such that
\begin{itemize}
\item[1.]
If $w\in L$ then
\begin{eqnarray*}
1-2^{-r(|w|)}\le \frac{g_1(w)}{f_1(w)}\le 1,~\mbox{and}~
0\le\frac{g_2(w)}{f_2(w)}\le 2^{-r(|w|)}.
\end{eqnarray*}
\item[2.]
If $w\notin L$ then
\begin{eqnarray*}
0\le \frac{g_1(w)}{f_1(w)}\le 2^{-r(|w|)},~\mbox{and}~
1-2^{-r(|w|)}\le \frac{g_2(w)}{f_2(w)}\le 1.
\end{eqnarray*}
\end{itemize}
In the following,
for simplicity, we omit the $|w|$ dependency of $r$,
and just write $r(|w|)$ as $r$.
Then, there exist two GapP functions
$h_1(w)\equiv g_1(w)f_2(w)$
and
$h_2(w)\equiv g_2(w)f_1(w)$, such that
\begin{itemize}
\item[1.]
If $w\in L$ then
\begin{eqnarray*}
1-2^{-r}\le \frac{h_1(w)}{f_1(w)f_2(w)}\le 1,~\mbox{and}~
0\le\frac{h_2(w)}{f_1(w)f_2(w)}\le 2^{-r}.
\end{eqnarray*}
\item[2.]
If $w\notin L$ then
\begin{eqnarray*}
0\le \frac{h_1(w)}{f_1(w)f_2(w)}\le 2^{-r},~\mbox{and}~
1-2^{-r}\le \frac{h_2(w)}{f_1(w)f_2(w)}\le 1.
\end{eqnarray*}
\end{itemize}
Then there exist two counting machines $C^1$ and $C^2$
such that
$h_1(w)=C_a^1(w)-C_r^1(w)$ and
$h_2(w)=C_a^2(w)-C_r^2(w)$,
where $C_a^j(w)$ and $C_r^j(w)$ $(j=1,2)$ are the numbers of
accepting and rejecting paths of $C^j$ on input $w$,
respectively.
There exist two normal counting machines $N^1$ and $N^2$ such that
$h_1(w)=\frac{1}{2}(N_a^1(w)-N_r^1(w))$ and
$h_2(w)=\frac{1}{2}(N_a^2(w)-N_r^2(w))$~\cite{GapP}.
Without loss of generality, we can assume that computation paths of $N^1$ and $N^2$
on input $w$ can be represented by strings in $\{0,1\}^{q(|w|)}$,
where $q$ is a polynomial.
(In the following, for simplicity, we write $q(|w|)$ as $q$.)
Then we consider a uniform family $V=\{V_n\}_n$ of quantum circuits defined by the following
procedure on input $w$.
First, the state
\begin{eqnarray*}
\frac{
|0\rangle^{\otimes 2k}
}{\sqrt{2^{q+1}}}\sum_{x\in\{0,1\}^{q}}|x\rangle
\Big((-1)^{N^1(w,x)}|N^1(w,x)\rangle|1\rangle
+(-1)^{N^2(w,x)}|N^2(w,x)\rangle|0\rangle\Big)
\end{eqnarray*}
can be generated by a polynomial-size quantum circuit.
Here, $k$ is a polynomial chosen later ($k$ precisely means $k(|w|)$),
and $N^j(w,x)=0$ (=1, resp.) if the path $x$ of $N^j$ on input $w$
is an accepting (rejecting, resp.) one.
Let us postselect the first, second, and third registers to
$|+\rangle^{\otimes 2k+q+1}$.
The (unnormalized) state on the last register, which is the output qubit,
after the postselection is
\begin{eqnarray*}
\frac{1}{2^{q+1+k}}
\Big((N_a^1(w)-N_r^1(w))|1\rangle
+(N_a^2(w)-N_r^2(w))|0\rangle
\Big),
\end{eqnarray*}
and therefore
\begin{eqnarray*}
P_{V_w}(p=1)=\frac{(N_a^1(w)-N_r^1(w))^2+(N_a^2(w)-N_r^2(w))^2}
{2^{2q+2+2k}}
=\frac{4(h_1^2(w)+h_2^2(w))}
{2^{2q+2+2k}}.
\end{eqnarray*}
Therefore, irrespective of $w\in L$ or $w\notin L$,
we obtain
\begin{eqnarray*}
\frac{f_1^2(w)f_2^2(w)}{2^{2q+2k}}(1-2^{-r})^2
\le
P_{V_w}(p=1)\le\frac{f_1^2(w)f_2^2(w)}{2^{2q+2k}}(1+2^{-2r}).
\end{eqnarray*}
Let us define $s(w)=f_1^2(w)f_2^2(w)$. Then the above inequality
means
\begin{eqnarray*}
\frac{s(w)}{2^{2q+2k}}(1-2^{-r})^2
\le
P_{V_w}(p=1)\le\frac{s(w)}{2^{2q+2k}}(1+2^{-2r}).
\end{eqnarray*}
Since
$
1-2^{-r+1}
\le
(1-2^{-r})^2
$
and
$
1+2^{-2r}
\le
1+2^{-r+1},
$
we obtain
\begin{eqnarray*}
\frac{s(w)}{2^{2q+2k}}(1-2^{-r+1})
\le
P_{V_w}(p=1)
\le\frac{s(w)}{2^{2q+2k}}(1+2^{-r+1}),
\end{eqnarray*}
which means, if we take $r\ge2$,
\begin{eqnarray}
\frac{P_{V_w}(p=1)}{1+2^{-r+1}}
\le
\frac{s(w)}{2^{2q+2k}}
\le
\frac{P_{V_w}(p=1)}
{1-2^{-r+1}}.
\label{equation1}
\end{eqnarray}
Note that
\begin{eqnarray}
\frac{1}{1-2^{-r+1}}
&\le&1+2^{-r+2},
\label{equation2}
\end{eqnarray}
and
\begin{eqnarray}
\frac{1}{1+2^{-r+1}}
-(1-2^{-r+2})
=\frac{1}{1+2^{-r+1}}
(2^{-r+1}+2^{-2r+3})
\ge0.
\label{equation3}
\end{eqnarray}
Therefore, from Eqs.~(\ref{equation2}) and (\ref{equation3}),
Eq.~(\ref{equation1}) becomes
\begin{eqnarray*}
(1-2^{-r+2})P_{V_w}(p=1)\le\frac{s(w)}{2^{2q+2k}}\le
(1+2^{-r+2})P_{V_w}(p=1),
\end{eqnarray*}
which means
\begin{eqnarray*}
\Big|P_{V_w}(p=1)
-\frac{s(w)}{2^{2q+2k}}\Big|
\le 2^{-r+2}P_{V_w}(p=1).
\end{eqnarray*}
Remember that $s(w)= f_1^2(w)f_2^2(w)>0$ and it is in FP.
We denote $t\equiv 2q+2k$ and take $k$ such that
$s(w)\le 2^{t}$.
For any polynomial $r_2$, let us take $r\ge r_2+2$.
Then,
\begin{eqnarray*}
\Big|P_{V_w}(p=1)
-\frac{s(w)}{2^{t}}\Big|
\le 2^{-r_2}P_{V_w}(p=1).
\end{eqnarray*}
Furthermore, from the state after the postselection, we have
\begin{eqnarray*}
P_{V_w}(o=1|p=1)=\frac
{(N_a^1(w)-N_r^1(w))^2}
{(N_a^1(w)-N_r^1(w))^2
+(N_a^2(w)-N_r^2(w))^2
}
=\frac{h_1^2(w)}{h_1^2(w)+h_2^2(w)}.
\end{eqnarray*}
For any polynomial $r_1$, let us take $r\ge r_1+2$.
Then, if $w\in L$ we obtain
\begin{eqnarray*}
P_{V_w}(o=1|p=1)=\frac{h_1^2(w)}{h_1^2(w)+h_2^2(w)}
\ge\frac{(1-2^{-r})^2}{1+2^{-2r}}
\ge1-2^{-r_1},
\end{eqnarray*}
and if $w\notin L$ we obtain
\begin{eqnarray*}
P_{V_w}(o=1|p=1)=\frac{h_1^2(w)}{h_1^2(w)+h_2^2(w)}
\le\frac{2^{-2r}}{(1-2^{-r})^2}
\le2^{-r_1}.
\end{eqnarray*}
Therefore, by taking $r\ge \max(r_1+2,r_2+2)$, $L$ is in ${\rm postBQP}_{\rm aFP}$.
Next we show
${\rm postBQP}_{\rm aFP}\subseteq{\rm AWPP}$.
Let us assume that a language $L$ is in ${\rm postBQP}_{\rm aFP}$.
Then for any polynomials $r_1$ and $r_2$
there exist a uniform family $V=\{V_n\}_n$ of polynomial-size quantum circuits,
an FP function $f$, and a polynomial $q$ satisfying the condition in
Definition~\ref{def:postBQP_aFP}.
From Theorem~\ref{PGapP}, there exist a GapP function $g$
and a polynomial $s$ such that
$
P_{V_w}(o=1,p=1)=\frac{g(w)}{2^{s}},
$
where $P_{V_w}(o=1,p=1)$ is the joint probability distribution for $o$ and $p$.
Therefore, if we take $r_2\ge1$, we obtain
\begin{itemize}
\item[1.]
If $w\in L$ then
$
P_{V_w}(p=1)(1-2^{-r_1})\le P_{V_w}(o=1,p=1)\le P_{V_w}(p=1),
$
which means
\begin{eqnarray*}
\frac{f(w)}{2^{q}(1+2^{-r_2})}(1-2^{-r_1})
\le \frac{g(w)}{2^{s}}\le
\frac{f(w)}{2^{q}(1-2^{-r_2})},
\end{eqnarray*}
and therefore
\begin{eqnarray*}
\frac{1-2^{-r_2}}{1+2^{-r_2}}(1-2^{-r_1})
\le \frac{g(w)2^{q}(1-2^{-r_2})}{2^{s}f(w)}\le 1.
\end{eqnarray*}
\item[2.]
If $w\notin L$ then
$
0\le P_{V_w}(o=1,p=1)\le 2^{-r_1}P_{V_w}(p=1),
$
which means
\begin{eqnarray*}
0\le \frac{g(w)}{2^{s}}
\le 2^{-r_1}\frac{f(w)}{2^{q}(1-2^{-r_2})},
\end{eqnarray*}
and therefore
\begin{eqnarray*}
0\le \frac{g(w)2^{q}(1-2^{-r_2})}{2^{s}f(w)}
\le 2^{-r_1}.
\end{eqnarray*}
\end{itemize}
Note that
\begin{eqnarray*}
\frac{g(w)2^{q}(1-2^{-r_2})}{2^{s}f(w)}
=
\frac{g(w)2^{q}(2^{r_2}-1)}{2^{s+r_2}f(w)},
\end{eqnarray*}
and we can see
$g(w)2^{q}(2^{r_2}-1)\in {\rm GapP}$,
$2^{s+r_2}f(w)>0$,
and $2^{s+r_2}f(w)\in {\rm FP}$.
If we take $r_1=r_2\ge3$,
$
\frac{(1-2^{-r_1})^2}{1+2^{-r_1}}
\ge
\frac{2}{3}
$,
and $2^{-r_1}\le \frac{1}{3}$.
Therefore $L$ is in AWPP due to the definition of
AWPP in Ref.~\cite{Fenner}.
\section{Proof of Theorem \ref{equivalences}}
\label{proof2}
The inclusions
${\rm postBQP}_{\rm exp}\subseteq{\rm postBQP}_{\rm size}$
and
${\rm postBQP}_{\rm FQP}\supseteq{\rm postBQP}_{\rm FP}\supseteq{\rm postBQP}_{\rm exp}$
are obvious.
Let us show
${\rm postBQP}_{\rm FQP}\subseteq{\rm postBQP}_{\rm exp}$.
Its proof uses the idea of an additive adjustment of the acceptance probability from
Ref.~\cite{JKNN12}
with a standard multiplicative adjustment.
Let us assume that a language $L$ is in ${\rm postBQP}_{\rm FQP}$.
Then, there exist a uniform family $V=\{V_n\}_n$ of polynomial-size quantum circuits,
a function $f:\{0,1\}^*\to {\mathbb N}$ whose $f(w)$ can be calculated
by another uniform family of polynomial-size quantum circuits for any input $w$, and a polynomial $h\ge0$ such that
$
P_{V_w}(p=1)=\frac{f(w)}{2^{h}}
$
($h$ precisely means $h(|w|)$)
and
\begin{itemize}
\item[1.]
If $w\in L$, then
$\frac{9}{10}\le P_{V_w}(o=1|p=1)\le1$.
\item[2.]
If $w\notin L$, then
$0\le P_{V_w}(o=1|p=1)\le \frac{1}{10}$.
\end{itemize}
We can take a function $t:\{0,1\}^*\to{\mathbb N}\cup\{0\}$
such that
$
2^{t(w)}\le f(w)<2^{t(w)+1}
$
for any input $w$. Note that
$t(w)$ can be calculated by a uniform family of polynomial-size quantum circuits.
From $V$, we construct the uniform family $W=\{W_n\}_n$ of
polynomial-size quantum circuits implemented on input $w$ as follows:
\begin{itemize}
\item[1.]
$W_{|w|}$ flips a coin. If heads, it simulates $V_{|w|}$.
\item[2.]
If tails, $W_{|w|}$ outputs $o=1$ with probability 1/2, and
$p=1$ with probability
$
\frac{2^{t(w)+1}-f(w)}{2^{h}}
$
independently.
\end{itemize}
Since
\begin{eqnarray*}
2^{h}-2^{t(w)+1}+f(w)\ge f(w)-2^{t(w)+1}+f(w)
=2(f(w)-2^{t(w)})
\ge0,
\end{eqnarray*}
we obtain
$
\frac{2^{t(w)+1}-f(w)}{2^{h}}\le1.
$
Then,
\begin{eqnarray*}
P_{W_w}(p=1)=\frac{1}{2}P_{V_w}(p=1)+\frac{1}{2}\frac{2^{t(w)+1}-f(w)}{2^{h}}
=\frac{2^{t(w)}}{2^{h}},
\end{eqnarray*}
and
\begin{eqnarray*}
P_{W_w}(o=1|p=1)&=&\frac{P_{W_w}(o=1,p=1)}{P_{W_w}(p=1)}\\
&=&\frac{\frac{1}{2}P_{V_w}(o=1|p=1)P_{V_w}(p=1)
+\frac{1}{2}\frac{2^{t(w)+1}-f(w)}{2^{h}}\frac{1}{2}}
{\frac{2^{t(w)}}{2^{h}}}\\
&=&\frac{f(w)}{2^{t(w)+1}}P_{V_w}(o=1|p=1)
+\frac{1}{2}\frac{2^{t(w)+1}-f(w)}{2^{t(w)+1}}.
\end{eqnarray*}
If $w\in L$,
\begin{eqnarray*}
P_{W_w}(o=1|p=1)
&=&\frac{f(w)}{2^{t(w)+1}}P_{V_w}(o=1|p=1)
+\frac{1}{2}\frac{2^{t(w)+1}-f(w)}{2^{t(w)+1}}\\
&\ge&\frac{1}{2}\frac{9}{10}
+\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{2}
=\frac{7}{10}.
\end{eqnarray*}
If $w\notin L$,
\begin{eqnarray*}
P_{W_w}(o=1|p=1)
&=&\frac{f(w)}{2^{t(w)+1}}P_{V_w}(o=1|p=1)
+\frac{1}{2}\frac{2^{t(w)+1}-f(w)}{2^{t(w)+1}}\\
&\le&\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{10}
+\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{2}
=\frac{3}{10}.
\end{eqnarray*}
Here, we have used the fact that
$
\alpha\frac{9}{10}+(1-\alpha)\frac{1}{2}\ge
\frac{1}{2}\frac{9}{10}+\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{2}
$
and
$
\alpha\frac{1}{10}+(1-\alpha)\frac{1}{2}\le
\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{10}+\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{2}
$
for $\alpha\ge 1/2$.
Note that $f(w)/2^{t(w)+1}\ge1/2$, since $f(w)\ge2^{t(w)}$.
From $W$, we construct the uniform family
$R=\{R_n\}_n$ of polynomial-size quantum circuits implemented on input $w$
in the following way:
\begin{itemize}
\item[1.]
$R_{|w|}$ simulates $W_{|w|}$.
\item[2.]
$R_{|w|}$ outputs $o=1$ if and only if $W_{|w|}$ outputs $o=1$.
\item[3.]
$R_{|w|}$ generates a random bit $b$ which takes $b=1$ with
probability $2^{-t(w)}$.
(Note that $t(w)\le h$.)
\item[4.]
$R_{|w|}$ outputs $p=1$ if and only if $b=1$ and $W_{|w|}$ outputs $p=1$.
\end{itemize}
Then,
$
P_{R_w}(o=1|p=1)=P_{W_w}(o=1|p=1)
$
and
$
P_{R_w}(p=1)=P_{W_w}(p=1)2^{-t(w)}=2^{-h}.
$
Therefore, $L$ is in ${\rm postBQP}_{\rm exp}$.
\section{Proof of Theorem \ref{classical}}
\label{proof3}
Let us first show
${\rm postBPP}_{\rm FP}\subseteq{\rm WAPP}$.
We assume that a language $L$ is in ${\rm postBPP}_{\rm FP}$.
Then, there exist a probabilistic Turing machine $V$,
an FP function $f>0$, and a polynomial $s$ such that
$
P_{V_w}(p=1)=\frac{f(w)}{2^{s}}.
$
There exist a \#P function $g$ and a polynomial $q$ such that
$
P_{V_w}(o=1,p=1)=\frac{g(w)}{2^{q}}.
$
Therefore, by the conditions on $P_{V_w}(o=1|p=1)$,
we obtain if $w\in L$,
$
\frac{1+\epsilon}{2}\le \frac{2^{s}g(w)}{2^{q}f(w)}\le1,
$
and if $w\notin L$,
$
0\le \frac{2^{s}g(w)}{2^{q}f(w)}\le \frac{1-\epsilon}{2}.
$
Since $2^{s}g(w)$ is a \#P function and $2^{q}f(w)$ is an FP function, $L$ is in WAPP.
Now let us show
${\rm UP}\cap{\rm coUP}\subseteq{\rm postBPP}_{\rm FP}$.
Let us assume that a language $L$ is in
${\rm UP}\cap{\rm coUP}$.
Then, there exist two polynomial-time nondeterministic Turing machines $N$ and $M$ such that
\begin{itemize}
\item[1.]
If $w\in L$ then
$N$ has exactly one accepting path,
and all paths of $M$ reject.
\item[2.]
If $w\notin L$ then
all paths of $N$ reject, and
$M$ has exactly one accepting path.
\end{itemize}
Without loss of generality, we can assume that both $N$ and $M$
have $2^{q}$ computation paths.
Let us consider the following algorithm $V$:
\begin{itemize}
\item[1.]
Randomly choose $x\in\{0,1\}^{q}$, and simulate
the computation paths represented by $x$ of $N$ and $M$ on input $w$.
\item[2.]
If both $N$ and $M$ reject, output $p=0$ and $o=0$.
If $N$ accepts and $M$ rejects, output $p=1$ and $o=1$.
If $M$ accepts and $N$ rejects, output $p=1$ and $o=0$.
\item[3.]
Postselect on $p=1$.
\end{itemize}
The probability of postselecting $p=1$ is $2^{-q}$.
Furthermore,
$P_{V_w}(o=1|p=1)=
1$ if $w\in L$,
and it is 0
if $w\notin L$.
Therefore, $L$ is in ${\rm postBPP}_{\rm FP}$.
{\bf Acknowledgements}.
TM is supported by the Tenure Track System by MEXT Japan,
the JSPS Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B) No.26730003, and
the MEXT JSPS Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas No.15H00850.
HN is supported by the JSPS Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (A)
Nos.23246071, 24240001, 26247016,
and (C) No.25330012,
and the MEXT JSPS Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on
Innovative Areas No.24106009.
We acknowledge an anonymous reviewer for pointing out a possibility
of improving the lowerbound of ${\rm postBQP}_{\rm FP}$
in an early draft of this paper.
|
\section{Introduction}
\setcounter{footnote}{0}
Relativistic jets are powerful, collimated outflows of energy and matter \citep{fen10}.
While these jets have been studied for decades in accreting sources, the underlying physics that governs jet behaviour is still poorly understood. Despite the many unknowns, it is clear that these jets play a crucial role in the accretion process
\citep{mei01,merhezdi03,fenbelgal04,falkormar04,galfenkai05,falcke95,fen06,fen10,gal10,cor12,gal14}.
Black hole X-ray binaries (BHXRBs), which contain an accreting stellar mass black hole paired with a companion star \citep{remmc06}, are ideal probes for jet phenomena because they vary on short timescales (days to months). Therefore, many different phases of jet behaviour (jet launching, fading, and quenching) can be analyzed in a single system.
Additionally, BHXRBs act as analogues to more observationally inaccessible systems, such as active galactic nuclei (AGN; whose entire outbursts evolve on million-year timescales), where jet feedback is thought to play a key role in galaxy formation and evolution \citep{fab12}.
In BHXRB systems, a compact, steady relativistic jet is present at the beginning of an outburst when the system is typically in the hard accretion state (see \citealt{fenbel04,fenhombel09,bel10} for further discussion on accretion states).
Jet emission in the hard state reveals a flat to slightly inverted optically thick spectrum ($\alpha\geq0, \textrm{where}\hspace{0.1cm}f_{\nu}\propto\nu^{\alpha}$; \citealt{fen01}) extending from radio through sub-mm frequencies (possibly even up to IR frequencies; \citealt{corfen02,cas10,chat,rus12}). Around the infrared frequencies, the optically thick jet spectrum breaks to an optically thin spectrum ($\alpha<0$; \citealt{rus12}), leading to a rapidly declining flux density with increasing frequency.
\cite{blandford79} were the first to propose a model for this flat/inverted jet emission, where the overall jet spectrum is generally described as the superposition of individual overlapping synchrotron components originating from different scales along the jet.
Since then, many variations on this model have been proposed that address and build upon some of the simplifying assumptions of the \cite{blandford79} model \citep[e.g.,][]{hj88,falcke95,mar01,marnowwil05,kai06,peer09,mal13,mal13b,mal14}.
Although many of these models successfully reproduce the observed jet spectra, they are still limited in describing the main properties and processes within the jet. These detailed jet properties are encoded within the jet spectral energy distribution (SED, e.g., \citealt{heisun03,mar03,heigrimm,marnowwil05,cas09,peer09}). Thus, high quality, well-sampled broadband observations are key in overcoming these challenges.
Given that jet emission is predicted to dominate over other system components (accretion disc and companion star) at frequencies below the near-IR band during the hard state \citep{rus06},
the mm/sub-mm regime is crucial to our understanding of the jet.
Currently only a handful of detections of outbursting BHXRBs exist in the mm/sub-mm regime \citep{fenpoo00,fenpoo002,og00,pared00,fender01,rus13,van13,rus14}.
However, recent upgrades to such instruments as the Submillimeter Array (SMA) and the Submillimetre Common User Bolometer Array 2 on the James Clerk Maxwell Telescope (SCUBA--2 on the JCMT), as well as the introduction of new instruments such as the Atacama Large Millimetre Array (ALMA) are enabling more detections of these sources with flux densities on the order of a mJy (or even as low as tens of $\mu{\rm Jy}$ with ALMA).
With mm/sub-mm data we are able to fill in a gap of $\sim2$ orders of magnitude in frequency in our broadband coverage. This is especially important when attempting to constrain the location of the spectral break, which is postulated to mark the location where particles are first accelerated to a power-law distribution in the jet \citep{mar01,marnowwil05,pol10,pol13,pol14}. Additionally, the flux and frequency of this spectral break can reveal insights into universal jet properties, such as minimum radiative jet power, key system parameters, such as accretion rate, black hole mass, radius of the inner accretion disc and magnetic field strength \citep{heisun03,mar03,heigrimm,marnowwil05,cas09,peer09,chat,pmark,rus13}, as well as uncover physical conditions in the jet,
such as the base jet radius, velocity, and opening angle (\citealt{rus13,rus12}; \citealt{rus14}).
However, the break has only been directly detected in three black hole sources, GX 339--4 \citep{cor02,gan11}, MAXI J1659$-$152 \citep{van13}, and V 404 Cyg (additionally in this source the radio--IR spectrum was curved, requiring a second break in the flat/inverted spectral regime; \citealt{rus12}), and indirectly constrained\footnote{Observing the spectral break indirectly refers to estimating the spectral break frequency by interpolating between the radio and IR-optical power-laws (through the unknown mm/sub-mm regime) as opposed to directly observing the spectral break within the data.} in other black hole sources. Most recently \cite{rus12} presented indirect jet break constraints for a large sample of sources, and similar results are available for Cyg X$-$1 \citep{rah11,now05}, and MAXI J1836$-$194 (\citealt{rus13a}; \citealt{rus14}). This indirect interpolation process introduces significant uncertainties in the derived location of the break (up to an order of magnitude in MAXI J1836-194; \citealt{rus13a}) and requires that the radio--sub-mm spectrum can be accurately represented by a single power-law. Data in the mm/sub-mm part of the spectrum allow us to make direct spectral measurements intermediate between radio frequencies and the spectral break, mitigating the uncertainties that come with interpolation and testing this single radio--sub-mm power-law assumption.
Recent results from observing campaigns of the BHXRB sources MAXI J1836--194 and MAXI J1659--152 show evolving SEDs, suggesting an evolving jet break that appears to tend toward lower radio frequencies as the accretion rate increases, and the compact jet begins to switch off during the transition to softer states at the peak of the outburst \citep{rus13a,van13,rus14}. Additionally, \cite{cor13} found that the jet break in GX 339--4 evolved as the jets switched back on in the reverse state transition. With mm/sub-mm data we can directly track the evolution of the break through mm/sub-mm frequencies and down to the radio band.
Tracking the break could allow us to correlate the changing break frequency with accretion properties, such as X-ray hardness (\citealt{rus14} find tentative evidence that the break frequency may correlate with X-ray hardness in MAXI J1836--194), which is essential in understanding what physical processes
are driving changes within the jet.
Although mm/sub-mm observations of BHXRBs are sparse, the few mm/sub-mm detections of BHXRBs to date in the literature (e.g., \citealt{fender01,rus13}) have measured considerably higher flux densities than seen at radio frequencies ($\sim40-70\, \textrm{mJy}$).
These high mm/sub-mm fluxes could be ``anomalous", in which the excess emission (above that of a flat spectrum extending across radio frequencies) at mm/sub-mm frequencies was produced by a yet unknown process not included in standard jet models (e.g., see \citealt{mar01}). On the other hand, high mm/sub-mm fluxes could be the result of a more inverted (rather than flat) radio through sub-mm spectrum (e.g., inverted radio through IR spectra have been observed in V404 Cyg; \citealt{galc05,hyn05}, A0620--00; \citealt{gala07}, and XTE J1118$+$480; \citealt{fender01}).
Therefore, it is essential to first understand the origin of the mm/sub-mm flux in BHXRBs before dynamic broad-band SEDs can be used to constrain jet properties.
\subsection{Swift J1745$-$26}
Swift J174510.8-262411 (also known as Swift J1745$-$26) is a transient black hole candidate \citep{vov12} source discovered in the Galactic centre region ($l=2.11^\circ, b=1.40^\circ$) by NASA-led Swift Burst Alert Telescope (BAT; $15-50{\rm \, keV}$) on 2012 September 16 \citep{cum12a}. An X-ray counterpart was confirmed in the hard X-rays ($0.2-10{\rm \, keV}$) by the X-ray telescope (XRT) on the Swift satellite on 2012 September 17 \citep{cum12b,shar12}.
X-ray spectral and timing observations from Swift and the International Gamma-Ray Astrophysics Laboratory (INTEGRAL) were used to classify this source as a low mass X-ray binary (LMXB)
black hole candidate system \citep{white95}. In addition, this outburst was classified as ``failed" \citep{bel12,sbar13}, as it did not reach the soft state (see \citealt{brok04} for further discussion on failed outbursts). A radio detection was made on 2012 September 17--18 with the Karl G. Jansky Very Large Array (VLA) in the 5.0 and 7.45 GHz bands of $6.8\pm0.1\, \textrm{mJy}$ and $6.2\pm0.1\, \textrm{mJy}$, respectively, suggesting that the emission likely originated from a partially self-absorbed compact jet ($\alpha=-0.22\pm0.09$; \citealt{mill12}).
Follow-up radio observations with the Australia Telescope Compact Array (ATCA) confirmed the presence of a partially self-absorbed compact jet ($\alpha=-0.05\pm0.04$; \citealt{cor12a}). Further, \cite{curr14} performed a detailed radio frequency study of the entire outburst and \cite{kale14} analyzed the decay of the outburst at X-ray, optical, and radio frequencies. The source outburst ended approximately 2013 June 20, when it could no longer be detected by Swift BAT.
Between 2012 September 20 and 2012 September 26 (i.e., early in the outburst), we obtained quasi-simultaneous radio and multiple band mm \& sub-mm observations of the source, combining data from the VLA, SMA, and JCMT SCUBA--2.
These data afford us the unique opportunity to directly measure the spectral indices in and between the radio and mm/sub-mm regimes.
In \S 2 we describe the data collection and reduction processes for the SMA, JCMT SCUBA--2, and VLA. In \S 3 we present the radio through sub-mm spectrum, outline the spectral fitting process, and show the results of the spectral fits. \S 4 contains an interpretation of the spectral behaviour presented in \S 3, as well as a discussion on the origin of high mm/sub-mm fluxes and variability at radio frequencies. A summary of the results is presented in \S 5.
\section{Observations and Data Analysis}
\subsection{SMA}
SMA observations (Project Code: 2012A-S055) of Swift J1745$-$26 were taken on three nights at 230 GHz (see Table~\ref{table:imflu}).
The very extended array configuration was used with a total of 5 antennas on September 20th, and 7 antennas on September 22nd and 25th (out of a possible 8 antennas). All observations were made in double bandwidth mode (single receiver, 4 GHz bandwidth) and with precipitable water vapour measurements of $\sim4\,{\rm mm},\, 3\,{\rm mm},\, {\rm and}\, 1\,{\rm mm}$ on September 20, 22, and 25 respectively. We used 1924-292 and 3C84 as bandpass calibrators, 1924-292 and NRAO 530 as gain calibrators, and Neptune as a flux calibrator\footnote{The SMA calibrator list can be found at http://sma1.sma.hawaii.edu/callist/callist.html.}. Data were reduced in the Common Astronomy Software Application (CASA; \citealt{mc07}) using standard procedures outlined in the Casaguides for SMA data reduction. Currently, CASA is unable to handle SMA data in its original format; therefore the SMA scripts, \textit{sma2casa.py} and \textit{smaImportFix.py} were used to convert the data into CASA MS format and perform the $T_{{\rm sys}}$ correction\footnote{Links to the SMA Casaguides and these scripts are publicly available at www.cfa.harvard.edu/sma/casa.}. On September 20 poor weather conditions, the limited number of antennas, and phase de-correlation led to overall poor quality data that prevented us from placing any constraints on source brightness.
Swift J1745$-$26 was significantly detected on both the 22nd and 25th, and careful phase self-calibration, ensuring we obtained smoothly varying solutions with time, was used to correct for any phase de-correlation that occurred on these nights.
All Swift J1745$-$26 flux densities, as measured by fitting a point source in the image plane with imfit in CASA, are presented in Table~\ref{table:imflu}\footnote{Note that difmap was also used to model fit the visibilities in the uv-plane rather than the image plane. All flux density values obtained from fitting in the uv-plane were consistent with those found from fitting in the image plane.}.
\subsection{JCMT SCUBA--2}
JCMT observations (Project Code: M12BC25) of Swift J1745-26 were taken on the night of 2012 September 21 in the $850\mu\rm{m}$ band (352.697 GHz). Two observations spaced approximately 45 minutes apart were obtained with the SCUBA--2 detector \citep{chap,holl}. Observations of the flux calibrators \citep{demp} Uranus, CRL618, and CRL2688 were present but we chose to use CRL2688 as it was closest in both time and space to our target source. The daisy configuration was used, producing a 3 arcmin map. During the observations we were in the Grade 2 weather band with a 225 GHz opacity of 0.07-0.08. Data were reduced in the Starlink package using standard procedures outlined in the SCUBA--2 cookbook and the SCUBA--2 Quick Guide\footnote{www.jach.hawaii.edu/JCMT/continuum/scuba2/ \\
scuba2\_quickguide.html}.
We had $\sim30$ minutes on source per observation for a total time of $\sim60$ minutes on source.
The Swift J1745$-$26 flux density values calculated for each observation as well as the co-added observations are listed in Table~\ref{table:imflu}, where the uncertainty in the flux density measurements include a substantial contribution from the uncertainty in the flux conversion factor (FCF). Note that data in the $450\mu\rm{m}$ (666.205GHz) band were obtained simultaneously with the $850\mu\rm{m}$ band, but the source was not significantly detected at $450\mu{\rm m}$, with an upper limit at $450\mu{\rm m}$ that was not strongly constraining ($\sim250\,{\rm mJy}$).
\subsection{VLA}
We re-reduced the VLA data presented in \cite{curr14} during the epochs taken within two days of our mm/sub-mm observations (see Table~\ref{table:imflu}). These radio epochs are quasi-simultaneous with our mm/sub-mm epochs, and thus represent the best opportunity to constrain the jet spectrum. The re-reduction was performed in CASA following the same flagging, calibration, and imaging procedure as \cite{curr14}, with more up-to-date antenna positions that were not published at the time of the initial analysis. All flux densities presented include the conventional VLA systematic errors of 1\% ($< 10{\rm GHz}$), 3\% ($10-40{\rm GHz}$), and 5\% ($> 40{\rm GHz}$).
Poor weather on September 26 meant that observations above 32 GHz suffered from complete phase de-correlation. As such, these measurements may include significant, unaccounted for errors and were not used in our analysis (further discussion is presented in \S 3.1).
\renewcommand\tabcolsep{2.5pt}
\begin{table}[t!]
\small
\caption{Flux Densities of Swift J1745$-$26 for Radio, mm, and sub-mm Frequency Data from the VLA, SMA, and JCMT}\quad
\centering
\begin{tabular}{ cccccc }
\hline\hline
&{\bf Date} &{\bf MJD}& {\bf Time on}&{\bf Freq.}&{ \bf Flux}\\
& {\bf (2012)}&&\bf{Source}&{\bf (GHz)}&{\bf (mJy)} \\
&&&{\bf (min)}&&\\[0.05cm]
\hline
VLA& Sep 20&56190.09&10.97 &5.0\phn&17.72$\pm$0.25\phantom{\footnotemark[3]}\\[0.05cm]
VLA& Sep 20&56190.09&10.97 &7.5\phn&17.97$\pm$0.22\phantom{\footnotemark[3]}\\[0.05cm]
SMA& Sep 20&56190.12&186.6 &219.2&\dots\footnotemark[1]\\[0.05cm]
SMA& Sep 20&56190.12&186.6 &232.6&\dots\footnotemark[1]\\[0.05cm]
JCMT& Sep 21 &56191.27&33.6 &352.7&45.27$\pm$7.16\\[0.05cm]
JCMT& Sep 21&56191.29&33.6 &352.7&37.23$\pm$7.12\\[0.05cm]
JCMT& Sep 21 &\phn co-added\footnotemark[2]&69.6 &352.7&39.85$\pm$5.04\\[0.05cm]
SMA& Sep 22&56192.13&160.0 &219.2&32.10$\pm$1.30\\[0.05cm]
SMA& Sep 22&56192.13&160.0&232.6&35.32$\pm$1.71\\[0.05cm]
VLA& Sep 23&56193.07&1.99 &5.0\phn&25.83$\pm$0.35\\[0.05cm]
VLA& Sep 23&56193.07&1.99 &7.5\phn&26.19$\pm$0.36\\[0.05cm]
VLA& Sep 23&56193.06&1.99 &20.8&26.78$\pm$1.68\\[0.05cm]
VLA& Sep 23&56193.06&1.99 &25.9&26.73$\pm$1.67\\[0.05cm]
VLA& Sep 25&56195.03&2.49 &5.0\phn&25.82$\pm$0.35\\[0.05cm]
VLA& Sep 25&56195.03&2.49 &7.5\phn&25.26$\pm$0.41\\[0.05cm]
VLA& Sep 25&56195.02&3.99 &20.8&28.35$\pm$1.11\\[0.05cm]
VLA& Sep 25&56195.02&3.99 &25.9&27.90$\pm$1.11\\[0.05cm]
SMA& Sep 25&56195.13&164.4 &219.2&35.11$\pm$1.11\\[0.05cm]
SMA& Sep 25&56195.13&164.4 &232.6&37.83$\pm$1.52\\[0.05cm]
VLA& Sep 26&56196.03&2.49 &1.4\phn&21.83$\pm$0.62\\[0.05cm]
VLA& Sep 26&56196.03&2.49 &1.8\phn&23.58$\pm$0.57\\[0.05cm]
VLA& Sep 26&56196.02&3.99 &31.5&31.31$\pm$1.03\\[0.05cm]
VLA& Sep 26&56196.02&3.99 &37.5&36.46$\pm$1.67\\[0.05cm]
VLA& Sep 26&56196.01&3.99 &41.5&38.86$\pm$3.33\\[0.05cm]
VLA& Sep 26&56196.01&3.99 &47.5&40.98$\pm$3.52\\[0.1cm] \hline
\end{tabular}
\footnotetext{No flux density values are given for 2012 September 20 as poor quality data prevented us from constraining the source brightness in this epoch.}
\footnotetext{Co-added images were combined using a pixel-by-pixel variance weighting technique implemented by the \textit{wcsmosaic} task in Starlinks KAPPA package.}
\label{table:imflu}
\end{table}
\renewcommand\tabcolsep{6.0pt}
\section{Results}
\subsection{Light Curves and Spectrum}
Figure~\ref{fig:lcurv} shows the radio frequency light curve spanning the first 60 days of the 2012-2013 outburst of Swift J1745$-$26 \citep{curr14}, with an inset panel that zooms in on the 6-day period at the beginning of the outburst (September 20--26) for which we have mm/sub-mm coverage.
Our observations show that, at mm/sub-mm frequencies, the source may have evolved somewhat differently than at radio frequencies, possibly even not evolving at all in the mm/sub-mm bands.
At radio frequencies we see a rise in source brightness, culminating in a brightness peak at 2012 September 26 (corresponding to the peak observed radio brightness over the outburst; \citealt{curr14}). Whereas, at mm/sub-mm frequencies, while the source brightness appears to remain relatively constant over our observations, poor temporal sampling prevents us from ruling out any variability,
or drawing any further conclusions on differences in temporal behaviour between the radio and mm/sub-mm regimes.
\begin{figure}[t!]
\centering
{\includegraphics[width=9.0cm,height=7.0cm]{inset.pdf}}
\caption[Radio and mm/sub-mm Light Curves of Swift J1745$-$26]{\label{fig:lcurv}Light curves of Swift J1745$-$26 during the first 60 days of its 2012--2013 outburst. Main panel: Radio (VLA and ATCA) light curves spanning the entire outburst, taken from \cite{curr14}. Inset Panel: Radio (VLA; diamonds) and mm/sub-mm (SMA/JCMT; stars) light curves during the hard state of the outburst; this panel contains only the data analyzed in this paper. Flux densities in the 1.5, 31.5, 37.5, 41.5, 47.5 GHz radio bands are not shown in the inset panel for clarity.
}
\end{figure}
The radio--sub-mm spectrum of Swift J1745$-$26 through different epochs during its 2012--2013 outburst can be seen in Figure~\ref{fig:specfitind} (along with power-law fits, described in \S 3.2). All of the radio and mm/sub-mm flux measurements were made within $\lesssim2$
days (i.e., quasi-simultaneous) of each other in an attempt to best constrain the jet spectrum.
Clear flux variability is observed between epochs at radio frequencies. Additionally, a more inverted spectrum is seen at higher radio frequencies in the 2012 September 26 epoch, where we see an apparent flux increase of $\sim15\;\textrm{mJy}$ between $\sim30-50\,\textrm{GHz}$ (transparent green points on Figure~\ref{fig:specfitind}).
However, due to complete phase de-correlation, attempts at phase self-calibration produced solutions that are not smoothly varying with time, but look like pure noise above 32 GHz (see \S 2.2 above). Therefore, while the upward trend in the highest frequency data from 2012 September 26 is intriguing, it is possibly (and perhaps most likely) an artifact of the self-calibration process in the presence of unstable atmospheric conditions. We caution against over-interpreting this feature and the remainder of our analysis will not include these data points.
The source brightness at mm/sub-mm frequencies is higher than that at radio frequencies (up to a factor of $2$), similar to other BHXRB sources with mm/sub-mm detections \citep{fenpoo00,fenpoo002,og00,fender01,rus13a,van13,rus14}. We discuss possible causes of high mm/sub-mm fluxes further in \S4.1 and \S4.3 below.
\subsection{Spectral Fitting in the Individual (radio \& mm/sub-mm) and Global (radio through sub-mm) Regimes}
Standard jet models \citep{blandford79} predict that a self-absorbed compact jet would produce emission that follows a single power-law from radio through sub-mm frequencies, and as such we would expect $\alpha_{\tiny{\textrm{radio}}}\sim\alpha_{\tiny{\textrm{mm/sub-mm}}}$. On the other hand, while this simple jet model has been proven to match observations at radio frequencies in multiple sources, its predictions have not been tested at higher mm/sub-mm frequencies. To test these models
in the mm/sub-mm regime, we chose to fit a power-law to our jet spectrum, using an
affine-invariant ensemble sampler for Markov chain Monte Carlo \citep[MCMC][]{for2013} and
the standard least squares algorithm in logarithmic space for power-law fitting to determine the best-fit and obtain accurate (1-$\sigma$) parameter uncertainties.
Figure~\ref{fig:specfitind}, Figure~\ref{fig:specfitglob}, and Figure~\ref{fig:specint} display various spectral fits in the individual (here a power-law was fit across radio only or mm/sub-mm only data) and global (here a constant slope power-law extending from radio through sub-mm frequencies was fit to the data) regimes for different epochs of data, Figure~\ref{fig:spes} displays all spectral indices calculated over the time period we had data, and Table~\ref{table:sp} displays the results of all the spectral fits.
\begin{figure}[t!]
\centering
{\includegraphics[width=9cm,height=7cm]{specfitind_thesis_pres_789.pdf}}
\caption[Radio and mm/sub-mm Spectral Fits of Swift J1745$-$26]{\label{fig:specfitind}Radio and mm/sub-mm spectra for various epochs during the hard state of the 2012--2013 outburst of Swift J1745$-$26. The solid lines indicate the power-law fits to the data (Table~\ref{table:sp}). The transparent green points indicate measurements that may suffer significant, unaccounted for, errors (see \S 2.2), they are not included in the fits and are presented here for comparison purposes only. The SMA measurements from 2012 Sep 25 are not included in the mm/sub-mm index fit as there is a $\sim4$ day separation between these data and the JCMT 350 GHz data. The mm/sub-mm index is more inverted compared to the radio indices across all epochs, although this result has a high uncertainty.}
\end{figure}
In the individual regime fits (Figure~\ref{fig:specfitind}), both the radio and mm/sub-mm are fit reasonably well with a single power-law (low $\chi^2$ given the number of degrees of freedom).
All of the epochs of radio data display a relatively flat spectral index ($\alpha\sim0.0-0.1$) as expected from a simple self-absorbed jet.
In the mm/sub-mm regime, the spectrum is more inverted ($\alpha=0.5\pm0.3$) than at radio frequencies in both epochs, albeit this is only a $1.5\sigma$ result. The high level of uncertainty in this index is mainly due to the poorly constrained 350 GHz data point, in which limited time on source ($\sim1$ hr) led to weak limits on flux density.
As a result, all spectral indices (radio and mm/sub-mm in all epochs) are consistent with each other at the $3\sigma$ confidence level.
In the global regime, we once again see that the data are reasonably well fit by a power-law (e.g., Figure~\ref{fig:specfitglob}). However, it is clear that some epochs are fit better with a power-law than others (with poorer fits showing deviations from a single power-law at the $\sim2\sigma$ level). In particular, the data sets containing the September 20 radio data show a much poorer fit than those containing the September 23 radio data, even when both data sets are paired with the same mm/sub-mm data (see Table~\ref{table:sp}). We believe that these poorer quality fits mainly result from flux variability at radio frequencies occurring between the days on which we have data, as the radio flux density was stable from September 23--25, whereas it rose significantly between September 20 and 23.
\begin{figure}[t!]
\centering
{\includegraphics[width=9cm,height=7cm]{specfitglob_thesis_789.pdf}}
\caption[Radio through sub-mm Global Spectral Fits of Swift J1745$-$26]{\label{fig:specfitglob}Radio through sub-mm spectral fits during the hard state of the 2012--2013 outburst of Swift J1745$-$26. At different epochs, the solid black lines indicate the power-law fits to the data (Table~\ref{table:sp}). The dotted black line indicates an extrapolation of the radio--sub-mm power-law to the optical regime, where the optical data point (from combined i' band measurements on 2012 Sep 21 and 25; \citealt{mun13}) is not included in the fit. A power-law is clearly well representative of the radio through sub-mm data at these times, and its interpolation is consistent with the measured optical point as well (see \S 3.3 and \S 4.2 for further discussion).}
\end{figure}
In an effort to mitigate this effect, we interpolated the radio frequency data to the days on which the SMA mm data were taken (see Fig.~\ref{fig:specint} and Table~\ref{table:sp}).
\begin{table*}
\small
\renewcommand\tabcolsep{4.0pt}
\caption{Spectral Indices for Individual and Global Epochs During the 2012--2013
Outburst of Swift J1745$-$26}\quad
\centering
\begin{tabular}{lcccccc}
\hline\hline
{\bf Frequency}&{ \bf Figure}&{\bf Data Sets}&{\bf Power-Law}&${\bm \chi^2}$&{\bf dof\,}\footnotemark[1]&${\bm P_{{\rm {\bf null}}}}$\footnotemark[2]\\
{\bf Band(s)}&{\bf (Color/Panel)}&{\bf Fitted (2012 Sep dd)}&{\bf Spectral Index (${\bm \alpha}$)}&&&\\[0.05cm]
\hline
radio&\ref{fig:specfitind} (blue)&20&$0.035\pm0.048$\footnotemark[3]&0&0&1.00\\[0.05cm]
radio&\ref{fig:specfitind} (magenta)&23&$0.025\pm0.028$\phn&0.06&2&0.97 \\[0.05cm]
radio&\ref{fig:specfitind} (yellow)&25&$0.050\pm0.020$\phn&4.98&2&0.08 \\[0.05cm]
radio&\ref{fig:specfitind} (green)&26&$0.109\pm0.013$\phn&1.68&1&0.19\\[0.05cm]
mm+sub-mm&\ref{fig:specfitind} (cyan)&22+21&$0.470\pm0.279$\phn&1.30&1&0.25 \\[0.05cm]
radio+mm+sub-mm&\ref{fig:specint}(cyan)&20+22+21&$0.172\pm0.009$\phn&11.56&3&0.01\\[0.05cm]
radio+mm+sub-mm&\ref{fig:specint}(blue) \& \ref{fig:specfitglob}(left)&23+22+21&$0.068\pm0.008$\phn&\phn6.06&5&0.30\\[0.05cm]
radio+mm&\dots&23+25&$0.088\pm0.007$\phn&\phn7.39&4&0.12\\[0.05cm]
radio+mm&\ref{fig:specfitglob}(right)&25+25&$0.090\pm0.007$\phn&11.37&4&0.02\\[0.05cm]
radio+mm&\dots&26+25&$0.095\pm0.007$\phn&\phn4.97&3&0.17\\[0.05cm]
radio+mm&\dots&25/26+25&$0.092\pm0.006$\phn&15.57&7&0.03\\[0.05cm]
radio+mm+sub-mm&\ref{fig:specint}&interp. to 22&$0.101\pm0.009$\phn&\phn3.14&2&0.21\\[0.1cm]
\hline
\end{tabular}
\footnotetext{Degrees of freedom}
\footnotetext{Null hypothesis probability, where the null hypothesis is that the data is perfectly represented by a power-law.}
\footnotetext{Note the spectral index calculated with 2012 September 20 radio data has a higher level of uncertainty than the other indices as it is calculated using only two flux density/frequency measurements.}
\label{table:sp}
\end{table*}
\renewcommand\tabcolsep{6.0pt}
\begin{figure}[t!]
\centering
{\includegraphics[width=9cm,height=7cm]{int_thesis_pres7892.pdf}}
\caption[Interpolated Global Spectral Fits of Swift J1745$-$26]{\label{fig:specint}Radio through sub-mm spectral fits for various epochs during the hard state of the 2012--2013 outburst of Swift J1745$-$26. The solid lines indicate the power-law fits to the spectra. The legend indicates the epochs of data included in each fit in order of increasing frequency (i.e., radio/mm/sub-mm). All spectral indices complete with errors can be seen in Table~\ref{table:sp}. The combination of quasi-simultaneous data (separated by up to 2 days) and flux variability between epochs clearly effects the results of our spectral fitting and thus our interpretation of the jet spectrum.}
\end{figure}
While the quality of the fits improved following interpolation, we still noticed some epochs with radio and mm data sets separated by only hours show poorer quality fits than those epochs with radio and mm data separated by days (for instance, the data sets that both contain SMA mm data from September 25, but differ in the fact that they contain VLA radio data from September 23 or September 25; see Table~\ref{table:sp}).
As such we opted to take a closer look at the individual radio bands by examining data on a per sub-band basis rather than a per baseband basis.
We fit a power-law within the lower frequency radio bands using per sub-band based data (in higher frequency radio bands, $>26\,{\rm GHz}$, the fractional bandwidth, $\frac{\Delta\nu}{\nu}$, is so narrow that it is not particularly useful to measure flux densities on a per sub-band basis). While all the bands follow a single power-law quite accurately as expected, surprisingly the indices within the bands do not always match the global indices across the bands (with deviations between $2-3\sigma$).
As VLA data are observed sequentially (not simultaneously) in some frequencies (e.g., while 5 and 7.5 GHz are observed simultaneously, as are 21 and 26 GHz, 5 and 21 GHz are observed sequentially), this result could be suggestive of rapid variability occurring on even shorter timescales, perhaps less than our observational cadence (minutes rather than days).
We discuss possible causes of the potential rapid variability further in \S4.4 below.
\begin{figure}[t!]
\centering
{\includegraphics[width=9cm,height=7cm]{spes.pdf}}
\caption[]{\label{fig:spes}Radio and mm/sub-mm spectral indices of Swift J1745$-$26. Circles indicate epochs containing only radio data, stars indicate epochs containing only mm/sub-mm data, squares indicate epochs containing radio, mm and sub-mm data, and triangles indicate epochs containing radio and mm data. For epochs that contain quasi-simultaneous data sets the midpoint is plotted and horizontal error bars indicate the entire time range. The black dashed line indicates a flat spectral index; $\alpha=0.0$. All spectral index measurements plotted here can be seen in Table~\ref{table:sp}. Data sets containing mm/sub-mm data show more inverted spectral indices than those containing only radio data.}
\end{figure}
\subsection{Jet Spectral Break Constraints}
\cite{mun13} present optical frequency measurements (Sloan i', Bessel I, V \& R Johnson) of Swift J1745$-$26 that are coincident with our mm/sub-mm observations.
To calculate de-reddened flux densities we use the prescription in \cite {card89}, adopting the value of $n_{{\rm H}}=(2.18\pm0.25)\times10^{22}\,{\rm cm}^{-2}$ from \citet{kale14}, which corresponds to $A_v=9.86\pm1.20$ \citep{guv09}. This leads to large uncertainties on the de-reddened fluxes, especially for the (bluer) optical bands, that prevents us from constraining the normalization and spectral index in the optical/IR regime. Therefore, we cannot estimate the frequency of the jet spectral break through interpolation between the radio/sub-mm and optical/IR power-laws, as is typically done.
We can compare the de-reddened flux density in the i' band ($3.93\times10^{14}\,{\rm Hz}$) from the 2m Faulkes Telescope South (FTS) of $f_{i'}=113^{+113}_{-\phn56}\,{\rm mJy}$ (corresponding to the average of all i' band observations, i' = $17.7\pm0.1$) to contemporaneous radio and mm/sub-mm measurements. We find that the i' flux density lies above the extrapolated radio--sub-mm spectrum in all our global fits (see Figure~\ref{fig:specfitglob}); however, the error of the i' flux density allows for it to be consistent or below the extrapolated radio--sub-mm flux densities. Since high extinction prevented \cite{mun13} from obtaining reliable optical/IR spectral information needed to place accurate constraints on the optical emission processes in Swift J1745-26, we consider two extreme cases for the origin of the i'flux density, emission arising completely from the jet or minimal emission arising from the jet. In the latter case, the reprocessing of X-rays in the outer accretion disc \citep[e.g.,][]{van98,char06} is the dominant emission process \citep{rus06}.
If the i' flux density arises entirely from jet emission, than the jet spectral break could be located either near or bluer than the i' band. To better estimate the lower limit for the jet spectral break, we performed Monte Carlo simulations that include extrapolations to i'-band of our radio to sub-mm power-law fit (and its errors) and the fully propagated errors on the i' flux density. When the simulated i' flux densities were above the power-law extrapolation, we assigned a lower limit of $3.93\times10^{14}\,{\rm Hz}$. When the simulated i' flux densities were below the power-law extrapolation, we assumed a canonical optically thin spectral index of $\alpha=-0.7$ \citep{mirrod99} and solved for the jet spectral break frequency. Our 99\% confidence interval lower limits for the jet spectral break frequency are $1.3\times10^{14}\,{\rm Hz}$ and $1.0\times10^{14}\,{\rm Hz}$ for data near September 21 and September 25, respectively.
If the i' flux density arises (almost) entirely from accretion disc processes, then that implies a significantly lower jet spectral break frequency. This assumption is not unreasonable given the high accretion disc fractions of emission in i' band in other BHXRBs and the fact that typically in a BHXRB the radio and optical flux densities are about the same to within an order of magnitude \citep{rus06}. Thus, in this case, we can only constrain a lower limit on the jet spectral break frequency using the radio through sub-mm data. Given the small errors on our mm-data from the SMA and the fact that they are always above the extrapolation of the radio spectral index, this sets a lower limit to the jet spectral break at the upper side band frequency for the SMA data, $\nu_{\rm break} \gtrsim 2.3\times10^{11}\,{\rm Hz}$. We note that if we use the same assumptions as in the above paragraph, then only $\sim 0.03\%$ of the i' flux density needs to arise from jet emission to be consistent with this jet spectral break frequency.
\section{Discussion}
\subsection{Interpretation of Spectral Indices}
The results of our spectral fitting in the individual regimes show that the radio spectral indices are all nearly flat ($\alpha\sim0-0.1$) as expected for a typical partially self-absorbed synchrotron jet \citep{fen01}, and similar to what has been seen in other BHXRB sources in the hard state (\citealt{rus12} and references therein; \citealt{rus13a}; \citealt{van13}).
Conversely, the mm/sub-mm index appears more inverted when compared to all the radio indices.
We have to be cautious when taking this result at face value as the highly inverted mm/sub-mm index is poorly constrained due to weak limits on the flux measurement at 350 GHz. Therefore, while the data suggest conflicting spectral behaviour between radio and mm/sub-mm regimes (and in turn the possibility of changing physical conditions in the jet), the plausibility of systematic problems with the relative flux measurements (i.e., spectral indices), combined with the fact that all indices are consistent within $3\sigma$, suggests that the discrepancy between regimes could be entirely due to the combination of systematic and statistical uncertainties.
If we compare the indices calculated with only radio measurements to the global indices containing the same radio measurements paired with the mm/sub-mm measurements (see Figure~\ref{fig:spes}), the global indices are noticeably more inverted (driven higher by the bright mm/sub-mm measurements). For instance,
there is a $\sim2.5\sigma$ difference between the 2012 September 23 radio spectral index (Figure 2 yellow) and the radio through sub-mm index from data interpolated to 2012 September 22 (Figure 3 red).
Therefore, when comparing absolute fluxes between the radio and mm/sub-mm regimes rather than relative fluxes (compare radio only and mm/sub-mm only indices), we find even stronger evidence for spectral inversion driving high mm/sub-mm fluxes in BHXRBs.
Recent work \citep{kai06,peer09} suggests that a more inverted jet spectrum (when compared to a flat, $\alpha\sim0$ spectrum) at radio through sub-mm frequencies could be caused by factors such as adiabatic expansion losses, high magnetic fields ($>10^5$ G) at the base of the jet or a more confined jet geometry. Internal energy dissipations (e.g., internal shocks) in the jet can lead to multiple acceleration episodes as particles propagate along the jet \citep{kai06,jam10}, and thus could be an additional factor governing the observed spectral indices in this regime.
Further, noticeable inversion in the radio--sub-mm spectrum can occur if the jet plasma accelerates due to the longitudinal pressure gradient, as the Doppler factor changes non-linearly farther out from the central compact object \citep{fal96,falmar,mar01}. The magnitude of such inversion is sensitive to many system parameters, in particular, the inclination of the system, where the inversion is more significant when the jet axis is not pointed along the line of sight (i.e., high inclinations). While this alone is not enough to explain the inversion in the Swift J1745$-$26 spectrum, it could be a contributing factor. Additionally, the acceleration profile or the presence of additional, unaccounted for cooling processes could also be factors contributing to the spectral inversion.
Similar spectral behaviour can be seen in low luminosity AGN (LLAGN; \citealt{ho99}), such as Sgr A*, where the spectrum becomes more inverted when approaching sub-mm frequencies (i.e., the sub-mm bump; \citealt{zyl92,fal98,mel01,an05}). This sub-mm bump can be well explained by synchrotron emission \citep{falmar} originating in the region near the black hole from the base of a jet (although this sub-mm emission can also be explained by particles in the inner accretion flow; \citealt{yuan03}), which in turn suggests that similar conditions (e.g., geometry) may exist in the innermost regions of LLAGN and BHXRBs. We note that while Swift J1745-26 was orders of magnitude higher in $L/{L_{{\rm edd}}}$ than Sgr A * during this outburst, \cite{plot15} find that the differences in jet power between quiescent and hard state systems (leading to weaker particle acceleration and a cooler more compact jet base in quiescent systems) primarily leads to changes in the optically thin part of the spectrum rather then the optically thick part to which we are referring here.
\subsection{Jet Spectral Break Frequency Lower Limit}
Based on the radio through optical measurements, we placed lower limits on the jet spectral break frequency of $\nu_{\rm break} \gtrsim 2\times10^{11}$ or $\nu_{\rm break} \gtrsim 1\times10^{14}\,{\rm Hz}$, depending on whether the optical emission arises from an accretion disc or the jet, respectively.
The former is consistent with jet spectral breaks in other BHXRBs, while the latter would be one of the highest lower limits placed on a jet spectral break in a BHXRB to date \citep[cf][]{rus12}. However, even the assumption that all the optical flux arises from jet emission does not require that Swift J1745$-$26 is an outlier among BHXRBs.
We observed Swift J1745$-$26 early in its outburst, only two to six days after its highest and hardest X-ray flux on 2012 September 18 \citep[MJD 56188.7;][]{bel12}, which corresponded to a 2--10 keV X-ray luminosity of $3\times10^{37} \frac{d}{3 {\rm \, kpc}} {\rm \, erg \, s^{-1}}$ \citep{mun13}. The discovery of a high frequency $\nu_{\rm break}$ near the peak hardness of an outburst would be consistent with an evolving jet break that evolves towards lower frequencies as X-ray hardness decreases (as seen in MAXI J1836--194; \citealt{rus13}; \citealt{rus14}). In addition, the discovery of a high frequency $\nu_{\rm break}$ near the peak luminosity (and thus the maximum accretion rate) of this outburst would be consistent with the \citet{rus14} results that suggest that evolution of $\nu_{\rm break}$ does not scale with the source luminosity in the hard state.
However, the large uncertainty on the optical flux density measurements combined with the uncertainty in the optical emission processes in Swift J1745-26 prevents us from drawing any further conclusions within the scope of this paper.
\subsection{High mm/sub-mm Fluxes}
The few BHXRBs observed in the mm/sub-mm regime have been surprisingly bright when compared to radio frequency measurements (for example, XTE J1118$+$480; \citealt{fender01}, MAXI J1836$-$194; \citealt{rus13}, and Swift J1745$-$26).
Historically, astronomers have typically found flat type spectra in jetted sources \citep{fen06} and it has only been recently that more inverted spectra have been observed in some sources ($\alpha>0.2$; e.g., \citealt{rus13a}). As such, it has been suggested that these high fluxes could in fact be an anomalous spectral feature, as they do not fit in with the standard flat spectral picture.
For example, \cite{mar01} found an alternative model-fit for the SED of XTE J1118+480 (as opposed to \citealt{fender01} who fit the SED with a simple broken power-law), where the sub-mm (350GHz) flux is considered anomalous.
Neglecting the sub-mm data point, the radio through X-ray emission can be almost entirely fit by synchrotron emission. As a result, \cite{mar01} find a flatter radio to IR spectral index than \cite{fender01}. This in turn results in a significant change in the location of the spectral break (from $\sim 40 \, \mu{\rm m}$ to $\sim 1 \, \mu{\rm m}$), implying different physical conditions in the jet.
With recent evidence suggesting an evolving jet spectral break, we have to be careful when labelling high mm/sub-mm fluxes as anomalous if they are not compared to contemporaneous radio measurements (i.e., $\leq 1$ day). In XTE J1118$+$480, the sub-mm measurement was not simultaneous with the radio measurements \citep{fender01}, thus it is difficult to determine whether this measurement is in fact anomalous or not (as is the case with Cyg X--1; \citealt{fenpoo00}, and GRS 1915$+$105; \citealt{fenpoo002,og00}).
In MAXI J1836--194 \citep{rus13a}, the mm measurement is clearly consistent with the contemporaneous radio measurements, and the radio through mm spectrum is quite accurately represented by a single power-law through multiple epochs. Additionally, the Herschel detections of GX 339-4 at even higher frequencies ($70\,\mu {\rm m}$/$160\,\mu {\rm m}$ or $4282.7\,{\rm GHz}$/$1873.7\,{\rm GHz}$), were also consistent with the extrapolation of an inverted radio frequency power-law \citep{cor13}.
Similarly, in our global (radio through sub-mm) spectral fits, both the SMA (230GHz) mm and JCMT (350GHz) sub-mm measurements are consistent with contemporaneous radio measurements (with deviations $<1\sigma$). Therefore, we now have evidence from three sources that challenge the hypothesis that high mm/sub-mm fluxes are anomalous in all BHXRB sources, and supports our suggestion presented in the last section that the same mechanism driving spectral inversion, could be driving high mm/sub-mm fluxes. This result clearly justifies the need to continue to sample this mm/sub-mm regime more completely in multiple sources to confirm whether this result holds across the Galactic BHXRB population, especially considering our sparse temporal coverage in the mm/sub-mm regime and the high level of uncertainty in our sub-mm (350 GHz) measurement.
\subsection{Radio Frequency Variability}
In \S 3.1 and \S 3.2 we presented evidence for flux variability at radio frequencies that might be occurring on timescales of minutes (between bands within a VLA observation) to days (between VLA and SMA/JCMT observations).
The variability we see in the spectrum may result from the uncertainty introduced either in calibrating the data, interpolating the data, systematic errors introduced from combining data from different telescopes, or a combination of the three. However, previous observing campaigns of BHXRBs have revealed the presence of variability in the hard state (e.g.,
GX 339--4 at radio through X-ray frequencies; \citealt{cor00,cor09}, and correlated IR-mm-radio flares in GRS 1915$+$105; \citealt{fenpoo002}).
Further, jet models of \cite{mal13,mal13b,mal14} and \cite{jam10} suggest a possible mechanism that could lead to such rapid variability. In these models, collisions between discrete shells of plasma (injected at the base of the jet with variable bulk Lorentz factors) cause internal shocks in the jet that can naturally produce multi-wavelength variability, possibly occurring on minute timescales at radio frequencies. Such variation is smeared out in longer integrations but could cause the scatter we see here at radio frequencies.
Conclusively distinguishing between these two options requires further in depth analysis of the data, and thus will be explored in future work.
\section{Summary}
In this paper, we have presented the results of our observations of the BHXRB source, Swift J1745$-$26 during its 2012--2013 outburst at radio and mm/sub-mm frequencies with the VLA, SMA and JCMT. This campaign marked both the first time that (quasi) simultaneous radio and multiple band mm \& sub-mm observations of a BHXRB have been obtained and the first time that the mm/sub-mm spectral index of a BHXRB jet has been measured. The combination of radio and mm/sub-mm measurements allowed us to compare the spectral behaviour between the two regimes and directly probe a part of the jet spectrum that has never been thoroughly sampled before. Through this work we aimed to test whether the jet emission we see was consistent with standard (power-law) jet models, as well as constrain the origin of the large mm/sub-mm fluxes we see in outbursting BHXRBs.
To analyze the jet spectrum in terms of standard jet models we fit a power-law model ($f_\nu \propto \nu^\alpha$, where $\alpha$ is constant) to the radio, mm/sub-mm, and global (radio through sub-mm) regimes for the different epochs when we had data.
Our spectral fitting revealed a more inverted spectral index in data sets that contain mm/sub-mm measurements ($\alpha\sim0.07-0.17$), when compared to data sets containing radio-only measurements ($\alpha\sim0.03-0.05$).
Therefore, our measurements suggest a more inverted spectral index
across radio--sub-mm frequencies is contributing to the high mm/sub-mm fluxes seen in BHXRBs, and perhaps the same mechanism behind the inversion may also be driving high mm/sub-mm fluxes seen in outbursting BHXRBs. Interestingly, this spectral inversion in the mm/sub-mm regime may be analogous to that seen in the sub-mm bump of LLAGN spectra (e.g., Sgr A*), possibly suggesting a common mechanism for bright sub-mm emission in LLAGN and BHXRBs.
Combining our radio and mm/sub-mm data with optical measurements from \cite{mun13}, we find that the i'band flux density may lie along the extrapolation of the radio--sub-mm power-law. Assuming that the i'band emission is entirely from the jet, this allows us to place 99\% confidence interval lower limits for the jet spectral break frequency of $\nu_{\rm break} \gtrsim 1\times10^{14}\,{\rm Hz}$ early in the outburst. While these are one of the highest lower limits placed on a jet spectral break in a BHXRB to date \citep[cf][]{rus12}, they are consistent with the emerging picture that links X-ray hardness and jet spectral break frequency, where a harder X-ray spectrum tends to have a higher $\nu_{\rm break}$ \citep{rus14}. However, as the optical flux density may contain significant contributions from an accretion disc, we can place an alternative lower limit to the jet spectral break frequency (using only radio and sub-mm data) of $2.3\times10^{11}\,{\rm Hz}$, with the optical flux density from the jet lying well below the extrapolated radio--sub-mm power-law. Such a lower limit to the jet spectral break frequency is similar to that seen in MAXI J1836$-$194.
While our data were reasonably well fit with a single power-law, small deviations at radio frequencies could suggest the possibility of rapid radio flux variability (timescales less than our observational cadence).
However, these deviations from a single power-law are only known at $\sim 2\sigma$ confidence, and could be explained by poor quality data.
In addition to possible rapid variability, we find clear day to day variability at radio frequencies. Therefore, taking into account that we observe jet emission from the optical depth, $\tau=1$ surface at each frequency, resulting in an unknown travel time delay in the jet where variation will be observed at mm frequencies before cm frequencies, we conclude that obtaining simultaneous ($<1$ day) overlapping multi-wavelength observations across multiple epochs is necessary to accurately probe the jet spectrum in BHXRBs.
Although our results contain some uncertainty, they clearly point out the vital importance of the mm/sub-mm regime in understanding the jet spectrum, demonstrate the capacity of current mm/sub-mm instruments to address questions in this regime, and justify the need to explore this regime further. More high-quality, well-sampled SEDs of BHXRBs in outburst, including the mm/sub-mm regime, will help further constrain the jet spectrum, aid in developing more accurate jet models, and ultimately help understand the underlying physics of relativistic jets in BHXRBs.
\section{Acknowledgments}
AJT would like to thank Erik Rosolowsky for sharing his extensive knowledge of MCMC and Craig Heinke for helpful discussions. AJT and GRS are supported by an NSERC Discovery Grant. This work was supported by Australian Research Council grant DP120102393. This work was supported by the Spanish Ministerio de Econom\'ia y Competitividad and European Social Funds through a Ram\`on y Cajal Fellowship (S.M.) and the Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovaci\`on (S.M.; grant AYA2013-47447-C03-1-P). The Submillimeter Array is a joint project between the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory and the Academia Sinica Institute of Astronomy and Astrophysics, and is funded by the Smithsonian Institution and the Academia Sinica.
The James Clerk Maxwell Telescope has historically been operated by the Joint Astronomy Centre on behalf of the Science and Technology Facilities Council of the United Kingdom, the National Research Council of Canada and the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research. Additional funds for the construction of SCUBA--2 were provided by the Canada Foundation for Innovation. The National Radio Astronomy Observatory is a facility of the National Science Foundation operated under cooperative agreement by Associated Universities, Inc.
|
\subsubsection{\@startsection{subsubsection}{3
\hfuzz=1.5pt
\DeclareFontFamily{OT1}{rsfs}{} \DeclareFontShape{OT1}{rsfs}{m}{n}{
<-7> rsfs5 <7-10> rsfs7 <10-> rsfs10}{}
\DeclareMathAlphabet{\mycal}{OT1}{rsfs}{m}{n}
\def\scri{{\mycal I}
\def\scrip{\scri^{+}
\def\scrim{\scri^{-}
\def\scripm{\scri^{\pm}
\def\scrp{{\mycal I}^{+}
\def\Scri{\scri}
\begin{document}
\title{Notes on the BMS group in three dimensions:\\
II.~Coadjoint representation}
\author{Glenn Barnich and Blagoje Oblak}
\date{}
\def\mytitle{Notes on the BMS group in three dimensions:\\
II.~Coadjoint representation}
\pagestyle{myheadings} \markboth{\textsc{\small G.~Barnich,
B.~Oblak}}
\textsc{\small Coadjoint representation of BMS$_3$}}
\addtolength{\headsep}{4pt}
\begin{centering}
\vspace{1cm}
\textbf{\Large{\mytitle}}
\vspace{1.5cm}
{\large Glenn Barnich$^a$ and Blagoje Oblak$^{b}$}
\vspace{.5cm}
\begin{minipage}{.9\textwidth}\small \it \begin{center}
Physique Th\'eorique et Math\'ematique \\ Universit\'e Libre de
Bruxelles and International Solvay Institutes \\ Campus
Plaine C.P. 231, B-1050 Bruxelles, Belgium
\end{center}
\end{minipage}
\end{centering}
\vspace{1cm}
\begin{center}
\begin{minipage}{.9\textwidth}
\textsc{Abstract}. The coadjoint representation of the BMS$_3$
group, which governs the covariant phase space of
three-dimensional asymptotically flat gravity, is investigated. In
particular, we classify coadjoint BMS$_3$ orbits and show that
intrinsic angular momentum is free of supertranslation
ambiguities. Finally, we discuss the link with induced
representations upon geometric quantization.
\end{minipage}
\end{center}
\vfill
\noindent
\mbox{}
\raisebox{-3\baselineskip}
\parbox{\textwidth}{\mbox{}\hrulefill\\[-4pt]}} {\scriptsize$^a$
E-mail: gbarnich@ulb.ac.be\\ $^b$ Research Fellow of the Fund for
Scientific Research-FNRS Belgium. Email: <EMAIL>}
\thispagestyle{empty}
\newpage
\begin{small}
{\addtolength{\parskip}{-2pt}
\tableofcontents}
\end{small}
\thispagestyle{empty}
\newpage
\section{Introduction}
\label{sec:introduction}
Coadjoint orbits of semi-direct product groups with an Abelian factor
are well-understood \cite{Rawnsley1975,VictorGuillemin16276
Li1993a,Baguis1998,Ali2000}. Their classification involves the same
little groups that appear in the context of ``induced
representations'', that is, the construction of unitary irreducible
representations of the full group from those of the little groups.
The purpose of the present paper is to apply this classification to
the centrally extended $\hatBMS$ group and elaborate on its relation
with asymptotically flat solutions to Einstein's equations in three
dimensions. Indeed, it follows from the considerations in
\cite{Barnich:2006avcorr,Barnich:2010eb,Barnich:2012rz} that the
reduced phase space of three-dimensional
asymptotically flat gravity at null infinity coincides with the
coadjoint representation of $\hatBMS$ at fixed central charges
$c_1=0, c_2=3/G$. As a consequence, this solution space consists of
coadjoint orbits of $\hatBMS$. There is thus a close relation between
classical gravitational solutions and unitary irreducible
representations of their symmetry group, or ``$\BMS$ particles'' in the
terminology of \cite{Barnich:2014kra}. Our objective here is to make
this relation precise.
The plan of the paper is the following. We start, in section
\ref{sec:remarks-relat-coadj}, by reviewing the coadjoint
representation of semi-direct product groups and the classification of
their coadjoint orbits. As an application, the case of the Poincar\'e
group in three dimensions is briefly discussed. Section
\ref{sec:co-adjo-repr} is devoted to a description of the coadjoint
representation of $\hatBMS$ and its relation to three-dimensional
asymptotically flat spacetimes at null infinity. In particular, the
full understanding of the coadjoint orbits is used to complete the
positive energy theorem for asymptotically flat three-dimensional
spacetimes \cite{Barnich:2014zoa} by a discussion of angular momentum
in this context. We end in Section \ref{sec:quantization} by
discussing the link between geometric quantization and induced
representations following
\cite{Rawnsley1975,VictorGuillemin16276,Li1993a,Baguis1998}, and apply
these considerations to the case of the $\hatBMS$ group.
Throughout this work, we will use notations, conventions and results
of \cite{Barnich:2014kra}, except for the fact that the dual of the
action involved in the semi-direct product, $\sigma^*$, will always be
written explicitly.
Specific coadjoints orbits of related (conformal)
Carroll groups have recently also been discussed in
\cite{Duval:2014uoa,Duval:2014lpa}.
\section{Coadjoint orbits of semi-direct products}
\label{sec:remarks-relat-coadj}
In this section we consider a semi-direct product group
$H=G\ltimes_{\sigma}A$, with $G$ a Lie group, $A$ an Abelian vector
group, and $\sigma$ a smooth representation of $G$ in $A$. For
simplicity, we will restrict the discussion here to finite-dimensional
Lie groups.
\subsection{Coadjoint representation}
The Lie algebra of $H$ is $\mathfrak{h}=\mathfrak{g}\oright_{\Sigma}A$
and the adjoint action of $H$ reads
\begin{eqnarray}
\Ad_{(f,\alpha)}(X,\beta) = \left( \Ad_f
X,\sigma_f\beta-\Sigma_{\Ad_fX}\alpha\right)
\quad\forall\;(f,\alpha)\in H,\;\;\forall\;(X,\beta)\in\mathfrak{h}.
\nonumber
\end{eqnarray}
The dual space of $\mathfrak{h}$ is
$\mathfrak{h}^*=\mathfrak{g}^*\oplus A^*$, whose elements, denoted as
$(j,p)$ with $j\in\calG^*$ and $p\in A^*$, are paired with
$\mathfrak{h}$ according to\footnote{We use the same notation
$\bra.,.\ket$ for the pairings of $\mathfrak{h}^*$ with
$\mathfrak{h}$, of $\calG^*$ with $\calG$ and of $A^*$ with $A$.}
\begin{eqnarray}
\bra(j,p),(X,\alpha)\ket = \bra j,X\ket+\bra
p,\alpha\ket. \nonumber
\end{eqnarray}
Writing down the coadjoint action of $H$ requires some
additional notation \cite{Rawnsley1975,Baguis1998}: a bilinear ``cross''
product $\times:A\times A^*\rightarrow\calG^*:(\alpha,p)\mapsto
\alpha\times p$ is defined by
\begin{eqnarray}
\bra\alpha\times
p,X\ket := \bra p,\Sigma_X\alpha\ket \quad\forall\;X\in\calG.
\label{wedge}
\end{eqnarray}
The notation is justified by the fact that, when $H$ is the Euclidean
group in three dimensions, $\alpha\times p$ can be identified with the
usual cross product in $\RR^3$. With this definition, the coadjoint
action of $H$ is given by
\begin{eqnarray}
\Ad^*_{(f,\alpha)}(j,p) = \left(\Ad^*_f j+\alpha\times\sigma^*_f
p, \sigma^*_fp \right),
\label{coadH}
\end{eqnarray}
where $\sigma^*$ denotes the dual representation associated with
$\sigma$, while the $\Ad^*$'s on the right-hand side denote the
coadjoint representation of $G$. More generally, the notation $\Ad^*$
will be reserved for the coadjoint representations of both $H$ and
$G$, the subscript indicating which group we are working with.
A special class of such semi-direct products consists of groups of the
form $H=G\ltimes_{\Ad}\mathfrak g_{\rm ab}$, with $A=\calG_{\rm ab}$
seen as an Abelian vector group. In this case,
$\alpha\times p=\ad^*_{\alpha} p$, with an obvious abuse of notation
consisting in identifying elements of $\mathfrak{g}_{\rm ab}$,
respectively $\mathfrak{g}^*_{\rm ab}$, with the corresponding
elements of $\mathfrak{g}$ and $\mathfrak{g}^*$. We use the
index ``${\rm ab}$'' to distinguish the dual space of the Abelian
algebra from that of the non-Abelian one. This class includes the
Euclidean group in three dimensions, the Poincar\'e group in three
dimensions and the $\hatBMS$ group. The dual of $\mathfrak{h}$ then
becomes $\mathfrak{h}^*=\mathfrak{g}^*\oplus\mathfrak{g}^*_{\rm ab}$
and the coadjoint action (\ref{coadH}) reduces to
\begin{equation*}
\Ad^*_{(f,\alpha)}(j,p)=\big(\Ad^*_fj+\ad^*_\alpha\Ad^*_fp,
\Ad^*_fp\big).
\end{equation*}
\subsection{Coadjoint orbits}
\label{coadOrb}
The coadjoint orbit of $(j,p)\in\mathfrak{h}^*$ is the set
\begin{eqnarray}
\calW_{(j,p)} = \left\{ \Ad^*_{(f,\alpha)}(j,p)|(f,\alpha)\in
H \right\} \subset\mathfrak{h}^*, \nonumber
\end{eqnarray}
with $\Ad^*_{(f,\alpha)}(j,p)$ given by (\ref{coadH}). The goal is to
classify the coadjoint orbits of $H$, assuming that the orbits and
little groups
\begin{eqnarray}
\calO_p = \left\{ \sigma^*_fp|f\in G \right\}\simeq G/G_p,
\quad G_p = \left\{ f\in
G|\sigma^*_fp=p \right\} \nonumber
\end{eqnarray}
of the action $\sigma^*$ are known. These are the orbits and little
groups that play a key role for induced representations of semi-direct
product groups. From the second half of the right-hand side of
(\ref{coadH}), involving only $\sigma^*_f p$, it follows that each
coadjoint orbit $\calW_{(j,p)}$ is a fibre bundle over the orbit
$\calO_p$, the fibre above $q=\sigma^*_f p$ being the
set
\begin{eqnarray}
\left\{ \left(\Ad^*_g \Ad^*_f j+\alpha\times
q,q\right)|g\in G_q,\alpha\in A \right\}
\subset\mathfrak{h}^*. \nonumber
\end{eqnarray}
It remains to understand the geometry of these fibres and the relation
between fibres at different points.
\subsubsection*{Preliminary: orbits passing through $j=0$}
Consider the first half of the right-hand side of (\ref{coadH}),
\begin{eqnarray}
\Ad^*_f j+\alpha\times\sigma^*_f p,
\label{rhs}
\end{eqnarray}
and take $j=0$ for now. Then, keeping $q=\sigma^*_f p$ fixed, the set
spanned by elements of the form (\ref{rhs}) is
\begin{eqnarray}
{\rm Span}_A:=\left\{\alpha\times q| \alpha\in A\right\}\subset\calG^*.
\label{awedgeq}
\end{eqnarray}
Now, the tangent space of $\calO_p$ at $q$ can be identified with
the space of ``infinitesimal displacements'' of $q$:
\begin{eqnarray}
T_q\calO_p =
\left\{ \Sigma^*_X q| X\in\calG \right\}\subset A^*.
\label{tSpace}
\end{eqnarray}
Note that $\Sigma^*_X q=0$ iff $X$ belongs to the Lie algebra
$\calG_q$ of the little group $G_q$, so that the tangent space
(\ref{tSpace}) is isomorphic to the coset space $\calG/\calG_q$. It
follows that the cotangent space $T_q^*\calO_p$ at $q$ is the
annihilator of $\calG_q$ in $\calG^*$, that is,
\begin{eqnarray}
T_q^*\calO_p=\calG_q^0:= \left\{
j\in\calG^*|\bra j,X\ket=0\;\;\forall\,X\in\calG_q \right\}
\subset\calG^*. \nonumber
\end{eqnarray}
In turn, the latter space coincides with the set (\ref{awedgeq}):
\begin{eqnarray}
T_q^*\calO_p=\calG_q^0={\rm Span}_A.
\nonumber
\end{eqnarray}
\begin{minipage}{.90\textwidth}\footnotesize
Indeed, for all $X\in\calG_q$, one has
$\bra\alpha\times q,X\ket=\bra q,\Sigma_X \alpha\ket=-\bra\Sigma^*_X
q,\alpha\ket=0$,
so $\alpha\times q\in\calG_q^0=T^*_q\calO_p$ for all $\alpha\in A$.
Conversely, any element of $\calG_q^0$ can be written as
$\alpha\times q$ for some $\alpha\in A$. To see this, consider the
linear map
$\tau_q:A\rightarrow\calG_q^0:\alpha\mapsto\alpha\times q$. The
image of $\tau_q$ has dimension
$\text{dim}\, A-\text{dim}\,\text{Ker}(\tau_q)$. Since
$\text{Ker}(\tau_q) = \left\{ \alpha\in
A|\bra\Sigma^*_Xq,\alpha\ket=0\;\;\forall\;[X]\in\calG/\calG_q
\right\}$,
elements of $\text{Ker}(\tau_q)$ are elements of $A$ constrained by
$\text{dim}\, \calG-\text{dim}\, \calG_q$ independent conditions.
This implies that
$\text{dim}\,\text{Ker}(\tau_q)
=\text{dim}\,A-\text{dim}\,\calG+\text{dim}\,\calG_q$,
so that
$\text{dim}\,\text{Im}(\tau_q)
=\text{dim}\,\calG-\text{dim}\,\calG_q =\text{dim}\,\calG_q^0$.
It follows that $\tau_q$ is surjective. \hfill $\blacksquare$
\end{minipage}
\vspace*{.25cm}
\noindent From this we conclude, more generally, that the orbit
passing through $j=0$ is the cotangent bundle of $\calO_p$:
\begin{eqnarray}
\calW_{(0,p)} = \left\{\left(\alpha\times\sigma^*_f p,\sigma^*_f p
\right)|(f,\alpha)\in H\right\} =
\bigsqcup_{q\in\calO_p}T_q^*\calO_p =
T^*\calO_p \subset\mathfrak{h}^*. \nonumber
\end{eqnarray}
\subsubsection*{General case}
It remains to understand the role of $j$ in (\ref{rhs}). Let us
therefore fix some $(j,p)\in\mathfrak{h}^*$ and focus for now on
elements $f$ belonging to the little group $G_p$, so that
$\sigma^*_f(p)=p$. With this restriction, the set of points reached by
the coadjoint action of $H$ on $(j,p)$ is
\begin{eqnarray}
\left\{\left(\Ad^*_f j+\alpha\times p,p\right)| f\in
G_p,\alpha\in A\right\}\subset\mathfrak{h}^*,
\label{blah}
\end{eqnarray}
where in general $\Ad^*_f(j)\neq j$ because the little group $G_p$
need not be included in the stabilizer of $j$ for the coadjoint action
of $G$. Now, it follows from (\ref{wedge}) that
\begin{eqnarray}
\Ad^*_f(\alpha\times p)=\sigma_f \alpha \times\sigma^*_f p.
\nonumber
\end{eqnarray}
Together with the requirement that $f$ belongs to the little group at
$p$, this property allows us to rewrite the set (\ref{blah}) as
\begin{eqnarray}
\left\{
\left(
\Ad^*_f\left(j+\beta\times p\right),p
\right)|f\in G_p,\;\beta\in A
\right\}.
\label{blahBis}
\end{eqnarray}
Hence, in particular, translations along
$\beta$ allow one to modify at will all components of $j$ that point
along directions in the annihilator $\calG_p^0$. The only piece of $j$
that is left unchanged by the action of translations is its restriction
$j_p:=j|_{\mathfrak g_p}$ to $\calG_p$, so the set (\ref{blahBis})
can be rewritten as
\begin{eqnarray}
\underbrace{\left\{\Ad^*_f j_p|f\in
G_p\right\}}_{\displaystyle\calW_{j_p}}
\times
\underbrace{\left\{\alpha
\times p|\alpha\in A\right\}}_{\displaystyle T_p^*\calO_p},
\quad\quad
\label{blahTris}
\end{eqnarray}
where $\calW_{j_p}\subset \calG_p^*$ denotes the coadjoint orbit of
$j_p\in\calG_p^*$ under the little group $G_p$. Thus, when
$\calW_{(j,p)}$ is seen as a fibre bundle over $\calO_p$, the fibre
above $p$ is the product (\ref{blahTris}) of the cotangent space of
$\calO_p$ at $p$ with the coadjoint orbit of the projection $j_p$ of
$j$ under the action of the little group of $p$.
The same construction would hold at any other point $q$ on $\calO_p$,
except that the relevant little group would be $G_q$. Thus, the fibre
above any point $q=\sigma^*_f p \in\calO_p$ is a product of the
cotangent space of $\calO_p$ at $q$ with the $G_q$-coadjoint orbit
$\calW_{(\Ad^*_fj)_q}$, where $(\Ad^*_fj)_q$ denotes the restriction
of $\Ad^*_fj$ to $\calG_q$. But little groups at different points of
$\calO_p$ are isomorphic: if one chooses a group element $g_q\in G$
such that $\sigma^*_{g_q}(p)=q$, then $G_q=g_q\cdot G_p\cdot g_q^{-1}$
and $\calG_q=\Ad_{g_q}\calG_p$. Therefore, $\calW_{(\Ad^*_fj)_q}$ is
diffeomorphic to $\calW_{j_p}$ for any $q=\sigma^*_f p\in\calO_p$; the
relation between the fibres above $q$ and $p$ is given by the
coadjoint action of $H$.
\subsubsection*{Classification of coadjoint orbits of $H$}
The conclusion of the last paragraph can be used to classify the
orbits of $H$. The {\it bundle of little group orbits} associated with
$(j,p)\in\mathfrak{h}^*$ is defined as
\begin{eqnarray}
\calB_{(j_p,p)} := \left\{ \left. \left(
\left(\Ad^*_f j \right)_{\sigma^*_f p},\sigma^*_f p
\right)\right |f\in G \right\}.
\label{bundleLGOBis}
\end{eqnarray}
According to the discussion of the previous paragraph,
$\calB_{(j_p,p)}$ is really the same as $\calW_{(j,p)}$, except that
the cotangent spaces at each point of $\calO_p$ are ``neglected''. The
bundle of little group orbits is thus a fibre bundle over $\calO_p$,
the fibre $F_q$ at $q\in\calO_p$ being a coadjoint orbit of the
corresponding little group $G_q$. The relation between fibres at
different points of $\calO_p$ is given by the coadjoint action of $H$,
or explicitly,
\begin{eqnarray}
(k,q)\in F_q
\quad\text{iff}\quad
\exists\,f\in G\text{ such that }
k=\left(\Ad^*_f j\right)_q\text{ and }q=\sigma^*_f p.
\nonumber
\end{eqnarray}
Conversely, suppose that two elements $p\in A^*$ and $j_0\in\calG_p^*$
are given. The group $G$ can be seen as a principal $G_p$-bundle over
$\calO_p$, equipped with a natural $G_p$-action by multiplication from
the left in each fibre. In addition, $G_p$ acts on the coadjoint orbit
$\calW_{j_0}$, so one can define an action of $G_p$ on
$G\times\calW_{j_0}$ by
\begin{eqnarray}
(f,k)\in G\times\calW_{j_0}\stackrel{g\in G_p}
{\longmapsto}\left(g\cdot f,\Ad^*_g(k)\right).
\nonumber
\end{eqnarray}
The corresponding bundle of little group orbits $\calB_{(j_0,p)}$ is
defined as
\begin{eqnarray}
\calB_{(j_0,p)}:=\left(G\times\calW_{j_0}\right)/G_p.
\label{bundleLGO}
\end{eqnarray}
Thus, from each coadjoint orbit of $H$, one can build a bundle of
little group orbits (\ref{bundleLGOBis}); conversely, from each bundle
of little group orbits as defined in (\ref{bundleLGO}), one can build
a coadjoint orbit of $H$ by choosing any $j\in\calG^*$ such that
$j_p=j_0$ and taking the orbit $\calW_{(j,p)}$. In other words, the
classification of coadjoint orbits of $H$ is equivalent to the
classification of bundles of little group orbits
\cite{Rawnsley1975,Baguis1998}.
This yields the complete picture of coadjoint orbits of $H$: each
coadjoint orbit $\calW_{(j,p)}$ is a fibre bundle over $\calO_p$, the
fibre above $q\in\calO_p$ being a product of $T^*_q\calO_p$ with a
coadjoint orbit of the corresponding little group $G_q$. Equivalently,
$\calW_{(j,p)}$ is a fibre bundle over $T^*\calO_p$, the fibre above
$(q,\alpha\times q)\in T^*\calO_p$ being a coadjoint orbit of
$G_q$. To exhaust all coadjoint orbits of $H$, one proceeds as
follows:
\begin{enumerate}
\item Pick an element $p\in A^*$ and compute its orbit $\calO_p$ under
the action $\sigma^*$ of $G$;
\item Find the corresponding little group $G_p$;
\item Pick $j_p\in\calG_p^*$ and compute its coadjoint orbit under the
action of $G_p$.
\end{enumerate}
The set of all orbits $\calO_p$ and of all coadjoint orbits of the
corresponding little groups classifies the coadjoint orbits of
$H$. Put differently, suppose one has classified the following
objects:
\begin{enumerate}
\item The orbits of $G$ for the action $\sigma^*$, with orbit
representatives $p_{\lambda}\in A^*$ and corresponding little groups
$G_{\lambda}$, $\lambda\in{\cal I}$ being some index such that
$\calO_{p_{\lambda}}$ and $\calO_{p_{\lambda'}}$ are disjoint
whenever $\lambda\neq\lambda'$;
\item The coadjoint orbits of each $G_{\lambda}$, with orbit
representatives $j_{\lambda,\mu}\in\calG_{\lambda}^*$,
$\mu\in{\cal J}_{\lambda}$ being some index such that
$\calW_{j_{\lambda,\mu}}$ and $\calW_{j_{\lambda,\mu'}}$ are
disjoint whenever $\mu\neq\mu'$.
\end{enumerate}
Then, the set
\begin{equation*}
\left.\big\{\left(j_{\lambda,\mu},p_{\lambda}
\right)\right|\lambda\in\cal I,\mu\in\cal J_{\lambda}\big\} \subset
\mathfrak{h}^*
\end{equation*}
forms a complete set of representatives for the collection of disjoint
coadjoint orbits $\calW_{\left(j_{\lambda,\mu},p_{\lambda}\right)}$ of
$H$. The (possibly continuous) indices $\lambda,\mu$ label the orbits
uniquely.
\subsection{Poincar\'e group in three dimensions}
\label{subsecPoincare}
The double cover of the Poincar\'e group in three dimensions is
\begin{eqnarray}
\SL(2,\RR)\ltimes_{\Ad}\mathfrak{sl}(2,\RR)_{\text{ab}},
\label{poinc}
\end{eqnarray}
with $\SL(2,\RR)$ the double cover of the connected Lorentz group in
three dimensions, and $\sl(2,\RR)_{\text{ab}}$ isomorphic to the
Abelian group of translations. The dual of the Poincar\'e algebra
consists of pairs $(j,p)$, where both $j$ and $p$ belong to
$\sl(2,\RR)^*$. One may refer to $p$ as a momentum vector and to $j$
as an angular momentum vector. The projection $j_p$ of $j$ on
$\calG_p^*$ is the classical analogue of intrinsic spin, while the
components of $j$ that can be varied through translations
$\alpha\times p$ represent orbital angular momentum.
The coadjoint orbits of (\ref{poinc}) are classified by the general
results of subsection \ref{coadOrb}. Let therefore
$\{p_{\lambda}|\lambda\in\cI\}$ be an exhaustive set of
representatives for the coadjoint orbits of $\SL(2,\RR)$, see
e.g.~\cite{Binegar1982,Radu,Witten:1987ty}. For example, take
$\cI=\RR\cup i\RR^+_0\cup\{e^{\pm i\pi/4}\}$ with $\lambda=0$
corresponding to the vanishing momentum;
$p_0=\lambda\in\RR^\pm_0, p_i=0$ corresponding to positive (negative)
energy and positive mass squared; $p_0=0$,
$p_1=0,p_2=i\lambda$, $\lambda\in i\RR^+_0$, corresponding to
negative mass squared; and
$p_2+ip_0=e^{\pm i\pi/4}$, $p_1=0$ corresponding to massless momenta
with positive or negative energy.
Whenever $p_{\lambda}\neq0$, the little group $G_{\lambda}$ is Abelian
and one-dimensional, so that $\mathfrak{g}_{\lambda}^*\simeq\RR$ and
the coadjoint action of $G_{\lambda}$ is trivial. The index $\mu$ in
the set $\{j_{\lambda,\mu}\}$ then runs over all real values,
labelling the component of $j_{\lambda,\mu}$ along the direction
$\mathfrak{g}_{\lambda}^*$ in $\mathfrak{sl}(2,\RR)^*$. We will denote
this component by $s$, for ``spin''. Hence, whenever
$p_{\lambda}\neq0$, the coadjoint orbit of
$(j_{\lambda,\mu},p_{\lambda})$ under the Poincar\'e group is
diffeomorphic to the cotangent bundle
$T^*\calO_{p_{\lambda}}$. However, two such orbits having the same
index $\lambda$, but different indices $\mu$ (i.e.~different spins $s$
of $j_{\lambda,\mu}$ along $\mathfrak{g}_{\lambda}^*$), are
disjoint. The only orbits left are those containing $p=0$. These are
all of the form $\calW_j\times\{0\}\simeq\calW_j$, where $\calW_j$ is
the coadjoint orbit of $j\in\mathfrak{sl}(2,\RR)^*$ under
$\SL(2,\RR)$.
\section{Coadjoint orbits of BMS$_3$}
\label{sec:co-adjo-repr}
As before, we use the notations and conventions of
\cite{Barnich:2014kra}, to which we refer for a definition of the
$\BMS$ group (and its central extension) and the construction of its
induced representations. The purpose of this section is to classify
the coadjoint orbits of the $\BMS$ group and to establish the link of
this classification with three-dimensional gravity. In particular,
angular momentum is studied in some detail.
\subsection{Generalities on the $\BMS$ group}
\label{sec:generalities}
The centrally extended $\hatBMS$ group is of the form
$G\ltimes_{\Ad}\calG_{\text{ab}}$ with $G$ the universal cover of the
Virasoro group. The dual of the $\hatbms$ algebra is the space
$\hatVect^*\oplus\hatVect^*_{\text{ab}}$, whose elements are
quadruples $(j,ic_1;p,ic_2)$, where $c_1$ and $c_2$ are central
charges while the supermomentum $p$ and the angular supermomentum $j$
are quadratic differentials on the circle. The pairing with elements
of $\hatbms$ is explicitly given by
\begin{equation}
\nonumber
\langle (j,ic_1;p,ic_2), (X,-ia;\alpha,-ib)\rangle
=\int^{2\pi}_0d\phii\,
\left(j(\phi)X(\phi)+p(\phi)\alpha(\phi)\right)
+c_1a+c_2b.
\end{equation}
Accordingly, the coadjoint action of the $\hatbms$ algebra is
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:34}
\ad^*_{(X,\alpha)}(j,ic_1;p,ic_2)=(\delta j\,d\phii^2,0;\delta p\;d\phii^2,0),
\end{equation}
with
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:34bis}
\delta p
=
Xp'+2X'p-\frac{c_2}{24\pi}X''',\quad
\delta j
=
Xj'+2X'j-\frac{c_1}{24\pi}X'''+\alpha p'+2\alpha'p-\frac{c_2}{24\pi}\alpha'''.
\end{equation}
The corresponding\footnote{More precisely,
\eqref{eq:34}-\eqref{eq:34bis} is the differential of
\eqref{eq:34a}-\eqref{eq:34abis} up to an overall minus sign.}
coadjoint representation of the $\hatBMS$ group is given by
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:34a}
\Ad^*_{(f,\alpha)^{-1}}(j,ic_1;p,ic_2)
=
\left({\tilde j}d\phii^2,ic_1;{\tilde p}d\phii^2,ic_2\right),
\end{equation}
where
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:34abis}
\tilde p
=
(f')^2p\circ f- \frac{c_2}{24\pi}S[f],
\quad
\tilde j
=
(f')^2\left[j+\alpha p'+2\alpha'p-\frac{c_2}{24\pi}\alpha'''\right]
\circ f-\frac{c_1}{24\pi}S[f],
\end{equation}
and $S[f]=f'''/f'-\frac{3}{2}(f''/f')^2$ denotes the Schwarzian
derivative of $f$.
\subsection{Coadjoint orbits}
\label{sec:coadjoint-orbits}
As for the Poincar\'e group, the coadjoint orbits of $\hatBMS$ are
classified according to the general results of subsection
\ref{coadOrb}. Due to the structure $G\ltimes\calG_{\text{ab}}$ of
$\hatBMS$, the orbits denoted $\calO_p$ in section
\ref{sec:remarks-relat-coadj} are the well-known coadjoint orbits of
the Virasoro group, see
e.g.~\cite{LazPan,Segal:1981ap,Witten:1987ty,Balog:1997zz,guieu2007}.
Nevertheless, we will keep calling these orbits ``orbits of the action
$\sigma^*$'' in order to distinguish them from the coadjoint orbits of
$\hatBMS$ itself.
For a given $(j,ic_1;p,ic_2)\in\hatbms^*$, the coadjoint orbit
$\calW_{(j,ic_1;p,ic_2)}$ is thus a bundle over the cotangent bundle
of the orbit $\calO_{(p,ic_2)}$, the typical fibre being a coadjoint
orbit of the corresponding little group. In the case at hand, each
$\calO_{(p,ic_2)}$ is a coadjoint orbit of the Virasoro group. Because
the structure of Virasoro coadjoint orbits depends crucially on the
(non-)vanishing of the central charge $c_2$, we will focus first on
the case that is relevant for three-dimensional gravity, namely
$c_2\neq0$.
A generic orbit $\calO_{(p,ic_2)}$ then has a one-dimensional
(Abelian) little group $G_{(p,ic_2)}$, whose coadjoint representation
is trivial. In particular, as in the Poincar\'e group, little
group orbits consist of only one point, specified by the real value
$(s,ic_1)$ of $(j,ic_1)_{(p,ic_2)}$ in $\calG_{(p,ic_2)}^*$; the value
$s$ can again be considered as the classical analogue of spin. Hence,
for generic supermomenta $p$, the coadjoint orbit
$\calW_{(j,ic_1;p,ic_2)}$ is diffeomorphic to the cotangent bundle
$T^*\calO_{(p,ic_2)}$ and is specified by (i) the value of the central
charges $c_1$ and $c_2\neq 0$, (ii) the supermomentum $p$, and (iii)
the spin $s$.
Still working at non-zero $c_2$, we also need to consider
``exceptional'' (non-generic) orbits $\calO_{(p,ic_2)}$ of constant
supermomenta satisfying $p=-n^2c_2/48\pi$ for some positive
integer $n$. For such orbits, the little group is the $n$-fold cover
of $\mathrm{PSL}(2,\RR)$, so, in contrast to generic orbits, the
little group's coadjoint representation is not trivial. The
coadjoint orbit $\calW_{(j,ic_1;p,ic_2)}$ then is a fibre bundle over
$T^*\calO_{(p,ic_2)}$, having a coadjoint
orbit of $\mathrm{PSL}^{(n)}(2,\RR)$ as its typical fibre.
The case of vanishing $c_2$ is more intricate, because then the little
group may have arbitrary dimension (see e.g.~the summary in
\cite{Khesin2009}, section 2.2). We will not consider this situation
in full generality here. Let us only mention one special case: take
$c_2=0$ and $p=0$ and consider the coadjoint orbit
$\calW_{(j,ic_1;0,0)}$, which is diffeomorphic to a coadjoint orbit of
the Virasoro group for central charge $c_1$ and quadratic differential
$j$. The central charge $c_1$ then plays a crucial role, in contrast
to the case $c_2\neq 0$ discussed above. Such orbits are the $\BMS$
analogue of the Poincar\'e orbits $\calW_{(j,0)}$.
\subsection{Covariant phase space of asymptotically flat gravity}
\label{sec:covar-phase-space-1}
\subsubsection*{Preliminary: the AdS case}
The general solution of Einstein's equations in three dimensions with
negative cosmological constant $\Lambda=-1/\ell^2$ and Brown-Henneaux
boundary conditions \cite{Brown:1986nw} can be written as
\cite{Banados1999,Skenderis:1999nb}
\begin{eqnarray}
ds^2
=
\frac{\ell^2}{r^2}dr^2
-r^2\big(dx^+-\frac{8\pi G\ell}{r^2}L^-dx^-\big)
\big(dx^--\frac{8\pi G\ell}{r^2}L^+dx^+\big)
\label{solAdS}
\end{eqnarray}
in terms of a radial coordinate $r\in\RR^+$ and light-cone coordinates
$x^{\pm}=t/\ell \pm\phi$ on the cylinder, where $L^+(x^+)$ and
$L^-(x^-)$ are arbitrary, smooth, $2\pi$-periodic functions. Under the
action of conformal transformations of the cylinder at infinity, these
functions transform according to the coadjoint representation of the
Virasoro group with central charges
\begin{eqnarray}
c^{\pm}=3\ell/2G.
\label{BrownHenneaux}
\end{eqnarray}
In this sense, the space of solutions of Einstein gravity on AdS$_3$
coincides with the hyperplane, at fixed central charges
(\ref{BrownHenneaux}), of the dual space of two copies of the Virasoro
algebra. In particular, solutions of AdS$_3$ gravity are classified by
Virasoro coadjoint orbits \cite{Navarro-Salas1999,Nakatsu1999}, and
this classification defines a symplectic foliation of the space of
solutions. From the point of view of the AdS/CFT correspondence, this
property should not appear as a surprise, given that the operator dual
to the bulk metric in AdS/CFT is the energy-momentum tensor, which, in
two-dimensional conformal field theories, transforms precisely under
the coadjoint representation of the Virasoro group.
\subsubsection*{The flat case}
A similar classification can be implemented for asymptotically flat
space-times. Indeed, in BMS coordinates $(r,u,\phi)$, the general
solution of Einstein's equations in three dimensions describing
asymptotically flat spacetimes at null infinity is given by metrics
\cite{Barnich:2010eb}
\begin{equation}
\nonumber
ds^2=\Theta du^2-2dudr+\left(2\Xi+u\Theta'\right)dud\phii
+r^2d\phii^2
\end{equation}
depending on two arbitrary functions on the circle,
$\Theta=\Theta(\phii)$ and $\Xi=\Xi(\phii)$. Under finite $\BMS$
transformations acting on the cylinder at null infinity, these
functions have been shown \cite{Barnich:2012rz,Barnich:2013yka} to
transform according to the coadjoint representation
\eqref{eq:34}-\eqref{eq:34abis} upon identifying $\Theta=(16\pi G) p$
and $\Xi = (8\pi G) j$, with central charges
\begin{equation}
c_1=0,\quad c_2=3/G.\label{eq:28}
\end{equation}
Thus, just as for AdS$_3$ space-times, the space of solutions of
Einstein's equations with suitable flat boundary conditions at null
infinity\footnote{Other boundary boundary conditions are of course
possible, leading either to a more restricted symmetry and dynamical
structure \cite{Henneaux:1984ei,Deser:1985qs} or to an enhancement
with Weyl symmetry \cite{Barnich:2010eb}.} is a hyperplane, at
fixed central charges (\ref{eq:28}), in the dual space of the
$\hatbms$ algebra. As a consequence, these solutions can be classified
according to $\hatBMS$ coadjoint orbits, and this classification again
splits solution space into disjoint symplectic leaves. For example,
the solution corresponding to $\Theta=-n^2$ and $\Xi=0$ represents
Minkowski spacetime for $n=1$, and a conical excess of $2\pi n$ for
$n>1$. Its coadjoint orbit $\calW_{(0,0;p,ic_2)}$ is diffeomorphic to
the cotangent bundle of the Virasoro orbit
$\Diff/\mathrm{PSL}^{(n)}(2,\RR)$. Other zero-mode solutions (that is,
solutions specified by constant $\Theta$ and $\Xi$ without
$\Theta=-n^2$) represent cosmological solutions, angular defects or
angular excesses, depending on the sign of $\Theta$ and $\Theta+1$
\cite{Deser:1983tn,Ezawa:1992nk,Cornalba:2002fi,Cornalba:2003kd
Barnich:2012aw}; when seen as elements of $\hatbms^*$, their
coadjoint orbits are all diffeomorphic to the cotangent bundle of
$\Diff/S^1$.
\subsubsection*{Surface charge algebra revisited}
The identification of the space of solutions with the coadjoint
representation of the asymptotic symmetry group can be understood from
the expression of the surface charges\footnote{A similar observation
also holds in the ${\rm AdS}$ case.}: for
$(X,\alpha)\in\mathfrak{bms}_3$, the latter are given by
\cite{Barnich:2010eb}
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:47}
Q_{(X,\alpha)}[\Xi,\Theta]
= \frac{1}{16\pi G}\int_0^{2\pi}d\phii\,\left[2\Xi(\phi)X(\phi)
+\Theta(\phi)\alpha(\phi)\right]=
\bra (j,p),(X,\alpha)\ket,
\end{equation}
when writing $\Theta=16\pi G p$ and $\Xi=8\pi Gj$. In turn, this gives
a physical interpretation to the coadjoint vectors $p$ and $j$ of
$\hatbms^*$ in the present context: they represent Bondi mass and
angular momentum aspects.
For any Lie group $G$ with Lie algebra $\calG$, there is a natural
Poisson bracket on $\calG^*$, defined, for any pair of smooth
functions $\Phi,\Psi:\calG^*\rightarrow\RR$, as
\begin{eqnarray}
\left\{\Phi,\Psi\right\}(j)
:=
\bra j,\left[d\Phi_j,d\Psi_j\right]\ket
\quad\forall\;j\in\calG^*.
\label{KKSbra}
\end{eqnarray}
Alternatively, in terms of coordinates $x_a$ on $\calG^*$,
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:1}
\{x_a,x_b\}=f^c_{ab}x_c.
\end{equation}
For the linear maps $\langle
(j,ic_1;p,ic_2),(X,-ia;\alpha,-ib)\rangle$ parametrized by Lie algebra
elements $(X,-ia;\alpha,-ib)$, the Poisson
bracket (\ref{KKSbra}) yields
\begin{multline}
\nonumber \left\{ \langle (j,ic_1;p,ic_2),(X_1,-ia_1;\alpha_1,-ib_1)\rangle,
\langle (j,ic_1;p,ic_2),(X_2,-ia_2;\alpha_2,-ib_2)\rangle\right\} =\\=
\langle (j,ic_1;p,ic_2),\left[(X_1,-ia_1;\alpha_1,-ib_1),
(X_2,-ia_2;\alpha_2,-ib_2)\right]\rangle.
\end{multline}
When $c_1=0,c_2=3/G$, these brackets correspond precisely to the Dirac
brackets of the surface charges (\ref{eq:47}) as computed in
\cite{Barnich:2006avcorr}. Equivalently, in terms of coordinates
$j(\phi),p(\phi),c_1,c_2$ on $\hatbms^*$, \eqref{eq:1} becomes
\begin{equation}
\nonumber
\begin{split}
&
\{j(\phii),j(\phii')\}=(j(\phii)+j(\phii'))
\d_\phii\delta(\phii-\phii')
-\frac{c_1}{24\pi}\d^3_\phii
\delta(\phii-\phii'), \\
&
\{p(\phii),j(\phii')\}=(p(\phii)+p(\phii'))
\d_\phii\delta(\phii-\phii')
-\frac{c_2}{24\pi}\d^3_\phii \delta(\phii-\phii'), \\
& \{p(\phii),p(\phii')\}= 0,
\end{split}
\end{equation}
while brackets involving $c_1,c_2$ vanish.
\subsection{Energy and angular momentum}
\label{sec:energy-angul-moment}
Classifying the space of solutions of three-dimensional gravity
according their asymptotic symmetries allows one to study properties
of energy and angular momentum, such as boundedness for instance
\cite{Garbarz:2014kaa,Barnich:2014zoa} (see also for
\cite{Raeymaekers:2014kea} for other recent considerations). Both in
the AdS$_3$ and in the flat case, energy turns out to be related to a
zero-mode of a coadjoint vector of the Virasoro group, and the
boundedness properties of this zero-mode are known
\cite{Witten:1987ty,Balog:1997zz}.
In the AdS$_3$ case, with general solution (\ref{solAdS}) and central
charges (\ref{BrownHenneaux}), the only solutions that belong to
Virasoro orbits whose energy is bounded from below are specified by
pairs $(L^+,L^-)$ in which both functions $L^{\pm}$ belong either to
the orbit of a constant $L^{\pm}_{\text{cst}}\geq-c^{\pm}/48\pi$, or
to the orbit of the ``future-directed, massless deformation'' of
$-c^{\pm}/48\pi$. This class of solutions contains, in particular, all
BTZ black holes, but also conical defects and solutions containing
closed time-like curves. On the Virasoro orbits of all such solutions,
the zero-mode $L^{\pm}_0$ of $L^{\pm}$ is bounded from below either by
the value $2\pi L^{\pm}_{\text{cst}}$, or (in the case of the massless
orbit) by the vacuum energy $-c^{\pm}/24$. In particular, since energy
($E$) and angular momentum ($J$) are related to the zero-modes of
$L^{\pm}$ by
\begin{eqnarray}
E=\frac{1}{\ell}\left(L^+_0+L^-_0\right),
\quad
J=L^+_0-L^-_0,
\nonumber
\end{eqnarray}
all solutions of AdS$_3$ gravity that belong to orbits with energy
bounded from below have their angular momentum bounded by
\begin{eqnarray}
|J|\leq \ell E+c^\pm/12.
\label{Jbound}
\end{eqnarray}
Similarly, solutions belonging to the orbit of BTZ black holes, which
correspond to the case where $L^+$ and $L^-$ are positive constants,
all satisfy the cosmic censorship bound $|J|\leq\ell E$.
In the case of asymptotically flat gravity, a natural definition of
total energy and angular momentum is then also simply given by the
zero modes of $p$ and $j$,
\begin{equation}
E=\int_0^{2\pi}d\phi\, p(\phi),
\quad
J=\int_0^{2\pi}d\phi\, j(\phi).
\label{tot}
\end{equation}
Following \cite{Misner:1970aa}, chapters 19 and 20, a justification
for this definition goes as follows. Total momentum and total angular
momentum are the surface charges associated with the translation and
the Lorentz Killing vectors of the asymptotically Lorentz frame, for
which $u=x^0-r$, $re^{i\phi}=x^1+ix^2$ (see section 5.3 of
\cite{Barnich:2014kra} for more details). In particular, total energy
and the total rotation vector, which has but one component in three
dimensions, are associated with $\d/\d x^0=\d/\d u$ and $x^1\d/\d
x^2-x^2\d/\d x^1=\d/\d\phi$, which yields \eqref{tot} when used in
\eqref{eq:47}.
The boundedness properties of total energy on coadjoint orbits of
$\hatBMS$ follow from the transformation law
(\ref{eq:34a})-(\ref{eq:34abis}). Because $p$ transforms as a Virasoro
coadjoint vector, without any influence of $j$ or $c_1$, the energy
$E$ has the same boundedness properties as $L^\pm_0$, but with central
charge $c_2$ given in (\ref{eq:28}). Thus, $E$ is bounded from below
on the orbit of $p$ iff this orbit is either that of a constant
$p_{\text{cst}}\geq-c_2/48\pi$, or that of the future-directed,
massless deformation of $-c_2/48\pi$. In particular, all cosmological
solutions and all conical defects in flat space belong to orbits on
which energy is bounded from below. Energy is also bounded from below
on the orbit of Minkowski space (corresponding to $j=0$ and
$p=-c_2/48\pi$), which realizes the minimum value of energy,
$E_{\text{min}}=-c_2/24$.
In order to discuss properties of total angular momentum, we define,
as in the Poincar\'e case, intrinsic angular momentum as total angular
computed in the rest frame. A solution labelled by $(j,p)$ is put in
its rest frame if the supermomentum $p(\phi)$ is brought to a constant
$p_{\text{cst}}$ by using a suitable superrotation. This is of course
not possible on solutions whose $p$ belongs to a Virasoro
coadjoint orbit without constant representative. By integrating on
the circle the piece $\alpha\times p=\ad^*_{\alpha}(p)$ in
\eqref{eq:34abis}, it then follows that:
{\em Intrinsic angular momentum is free from supertranslation
ambiguities.}
By contrast, whenever both $p(\phi)$ and $\alpha(\phi)$ are
non-constant on the circle, meaning in particular that the applied
supertranslation is not just a time translation, $\ad^*_{\alpha}(p)$
has a generally non-vanishing zero-mode and contributes to total
angular momentum.
Considering the boundedness properties of the total angular
momentum $J$ as such does not make sense. Whenever $p(\phi)$ is
non-constant on the circle, the value of $J$ can be tuned at will by
acting with supertranslations. In particular, total angular momentum
is unbounded from above and from below on all orbits $\calO_p$. This
should be contrasted with the completely different situation in
AdS$_3$ spacetimes, where separate boundedness properties for the
left- and right-moving energies imply boundedness of total angular
momentum, as in eq. (\ref{Jbound}).
As regards intrinsic angular momentum, the situation is different. By
construction, supertranslations play no role there. In the rest frame,
the only superrotations that are still allowed are those of the little
group $G_{p_{\text{cst}}}$. So for boundedness properties of intrinsic
angular momentum, one needs to study its boundedness properties on
coadjoint orbits of the little group.
Let us illustrate our purposes with two examples. First,
consider the orbit $\calO_p$ of a massive $\BMS$ solution, that is, an
orbit containing a constant supermomentum
$p(\phi)=p_{\text{cst}}>-c_2/48\pi$. The corresponding little group
$\text{U}(1)$ consists of rigid rotations $f(\phi)=\phi+{\rm cst}$,
and it follows from \eqref{eq:34abis} that intrinsic angular momentum
is unaffected by such superrotations.
Second, consider the vacuum supermomentum vector $p=-c_2/48\pi$, whose
little group is $\text{PSL}(2,\RR)$. It follows from the discussion of
section 5.3 of \cite{Barnich:2014kra} that the coadjoint orbits of
$\text{PSL}(2,\RR)$ are the ``mass hyperboloids'' of the Lorentz group
in three dimensions, represented in a three-dimensional space with
axes $J_0=J$, $J_{\pm 1}=\int_0^{2\pi}d\phi\, j\, e^{\pm i\phi}$.
Depending on the $\text{PSL}(2,\RR)$-orbit, the boundedness properties
of $J$ are very different. The trivial case of the vacuum orbit
$J_0=J_{\pm 1}=0$ brings nothing new, as it is left invariant by the
whole little group $\text{PSL}(2,\RR)$; intrinsic angular momentum
vanishes and total angular momentum is entirely composed of orbital
angular momentum. By contrast, consider the ``future-directed,
massive orbit'' of $\text{PSL}(2,\RR)$, the upper half of the
two-sheeted hyperboloid. Then, little group transformations act
non-trivially on $J$ but intrinsic angular momentum is bounded from
below by the intersection of the hyperboloid with the $J_0$ axis. It
may, however, take an arbitrarily large value. Similar results hold
for the upper conical orbits of $\text{PSL}(2,\RR)$. For the
one-sheeted hypeboloid, the ``tachyonic'' orbit, intrinsic angular
momentum is bounded neither from below, nor from above.
\section{Quantization and induced representations}
\label{sec:quantization}
In this section we discuss the relation between classical asymptotically
flat solutions and $\BMS$ particles, i.e.~the link between
coadjoint and induced representations of $\hatBMS$, in terms of
geometric quantization.
\subsection{Geometric quantization for semi-direct products}
\subsubsection*{Generalities on the orbit method}
Let $G$ be a Lie group with Lie algebra $\calG$. The Poisson bracket
(\ref{KKSbra}) defines a symplectic foliation of $\calG^*$, the leaf
through $j\in\calG^*$ being the coadjoint orbit $\calW_j$ of $j$. For
any $k$ belonging to $\calW_j$, the tangent space of $\calW_j$ at $k$
can be identified with the space of ``infinitesimal displacements''
$\ad^*_X(k)$, where $X\in\calG$. The bracket (\ref{KKSbra}) then
induces, on each orbit $\calW_j$, a $G$-invariant symplectic form
$\omega$ given by \cite{kirillov1976elements,Kostant1970,Souriau1970}
\begin{eqnarray}
\omega_k\left(\ad^*_X(k),\ad^*_Y(k)\right):= k\left([X,Y]\right).
\label{KKS}
\end{eqnarray}
Geometric quantization associates a quantum Hilbert space with the
phase space $\calW_j$, proceeding in two steps: prequantization and
polarization.
Prequantization
turns out to be possible provided the symplectic form satisfies the
integrality condition
\begin{eqnarray}
\left[\frac{\omega}{2\pi}\right]\in H^2_{\text{de Rham}}(\calW_j,\ZZ),
\label{integrality}
\end{eqnarray}
in which case there exists a complex line bundle over $\calW_j$,
endowed with a connection whose curvature two-form is
$\omega/2\pi$. The pre-quantum Hilbert space consists of all sections
of this line bundle that are square-integrable with respect to a
Hermitian structure preserved by the connection. This Hilbert space is
then reduced to a smaller subspace by choosing a polarization $-$ an
appropriate subbundle of the complexified tangent bundle of the
symplectic manifold $-$ and restricting both the quantizable
observables and the quantum wavefunctions to be compatible with this
polarization. The idea of the orbit method is that, when a suitable
polarization can be found, geometric quantization should produce an
irreducible unitary representation of the corresponding Lie group
$G$. For compact or solvable Lie groups, this procedure actually
exhausts all irreducible unitary representations; for other Lie
groups, complications may arise, especially if the group is
infinite-dimensional.
\subsubsection*{Semi-direct products}
Suppose we want to quantize a coadjoint orbit $\calW_{(j,p)}$ of the
semi-direct product group $H$. Since the Lie
bracket in $\mathfrak{h}$ reads
\begin{eqnarray}
\left[(X,\beta),(Y,\gamma)\right]
=
\left([X,Y],\Sigma_X\gamma-\Sigma_Y\beta\right),
\nonumber
\end{eqnarray}
the natural symplectic form (\ref{KKS}), evaluated at the point
$\big(\Ad^*_fj+\alpha\times\sigma^*_fp,\sigma^*_fp\big)$ in
$\calW_{(j,p)}$, is given by\footnote{Here we write the argument of
$\omega^H$ as a pair of elements of the Lie algebra of $H$. This is
an abuse of notation, being understood that these elements represent
tangent vectors of $\calW_{(j,p)}$ at the point
$\left(\Ad^*_f(j)+\alpha\times q,q\right)$ through their coadjoint
action on that point, as in (\ref{KKS}).}
\begin{eqnarray}
& & \omega_{\left(\Ad^*_fj+\alpha\times q,q\right)}
\left((X,\beta),(Y,\gamma)\right)=\nonumber\\
\label{omegaH}
& = &
\bra\Ad^*_fj,[X,Y]\ket+\bra\gamma\times q,X\ket
-\bra\beta\times q,Y\ket+\bra\alpha\times q,[X,Y]\ket,
\end{eqnarray}
where we write $q=\sigma^*_fp$ for simplicity. In the three last terms
of this expression, one may recognize the Liouville symplectic form on
the cotangent bundle $T^*\calO_p$, provided $\alpha\times q$ is seen
as an element of $T^*_q\calO_p$. On the other hand, the first term of
(\ref{omegaH}) looks just like the natural symplectic form (\ref{KKS})
on the $G$-coadjoint orbit of $j$ up to the fact that $\Ad^*_fj$ does
{\it not}, generally, belong to $\calG_q^*$. Thus, if we see
$\calW_{(j,p)}$ as a fibre bundle over $T^*\calO_p$ with typical fibre
the coadjoint orbit $\calW_{j_p}$ of the little group, restricting the
symplectic form (\ref{omegaH}) to a fibre gives back the symplectic
form on the little group's coadjoint orbit.
This observation actually follows from a more general result, which
states that the coadjoint orbits of a semi-direct product are obtained
by symplectic induction from the coadjoint orbits of its little
groups, see \cite{Baguis1998,duval1992} for details. This result is of
crucial importance for geometric quantization of
$\calW_{(j,p)}$. Indeed, since the Liouville symplectic form is exact,
it implies that the cohomology class of $\omega$ in (\ref{omegaH})
depends only on the class of the natural symplectic form on the
appropriate coadjoint orbit of the little group. In other words, the
$H$-coadjoint orbit $\calW_{(j,p)}$ is prequantizable iff the
corresponding $G_p$-coadjoint orbit $\calW_{j_p}$ is
prequantizable. Provided a suitable polarization can be found for this
orbit, one obtains a unitary representation $\calR$ of the little
group $G_p$, acting on a complex Hilbert space $\calE$ whose scalar
product we will denote as $(.|.)$. One can then use the representation
$\calR$ of $G_p$ to ``induce'' a representation $\calT$ of $H$. To do
so, one chooses a real polarization for sections of the trivial line
bundle over $T^*\calO_p$, such that polarized sections be functions
$\calO_p\rightarrow\CC$. Provided a $G$-quasi-invariant measure $\mu$
exists on $\calO_p$, the Hilbert space $\calH$ obtained upon
quantization of $\calW_{(j,p)}$ becomes the space of square-integrable
``wavefunctions'' $\Psi:\calO_p\rightarrow\calE$, their scalar product
being
\begin{equation}
\langle\Phi|\Psi\rangle:=\int_{\Ob}d\mu(q)\left(\Phi(q)|\Psi(q)\right).
\label{scalp}
\end{equation}
The action $\calT$ of $H$ on the space of such wavefunctions then
coincides with that of an induced representation
\cite{duval1992,Li1993}. Thus, geometric quantization of the coadjoint
orbits of a semi-direct product group reproduces induced
representations in the sense of Wigner and Mackey.
We should mention, however, that not all induced representations can
be recovered in this way. For instance, if the little group $G_p$ is
disconnected, it may happen that the only representations of $G_p$
available through quantization are those in which the discrete
subgroup of $G_p$ is represented trivially \cite{Li1993}. Furthermore,
the construction may suffer from other complications, related for
instance to the non-existence of a suitable polarization.
\subsection{Gravity and BMS$_3$ particles}
\label{sec:quant-induc-repr}
We can apply the procedure outlined in the previous subsection to
coadjoint orbits of the $\hatBMS$ group, seen as phase spaces equipped
with the natural symplectic form (\ref{omegaH}). As sketched above for
the case of finite-dimensional Lie groups, geometric quantization of
such orbits produces induced representations. Owing to the discussion
of section \ref{sec:co-adjo-repr}, this relation can be rephrased in
terms of solutions of Einstein's equations in an asymptotically flat
space-time in three dimensions: geometric quantization of the orbit
corresponding to a solution labelled by the pair $(j,p)$ produces a
$\BMS$ particle whose supermomenta span the orbit $\calO_p$, and whose
spin is determined by $j_p$. This establishes the link between the
considerations of \cite{Barnich:2014kra} and three-dimensional
gravity.
There is, however, an important subtlety: in writing down the scalar
product (\ref{scalp}), we assumed the existence of a quasi-invariant
measure $\mu$ on $\calO_p$. When $\calO_p$ is a finite-dimensional
manifold, such a measure always exists
\cite{A.O.Barut702}. Furthermore, for semi-direct products of the form
$\GG$, the orbits $\calO_p$ are coadjoint orbits of $G$; they have,
therefore, a symplectic form $\omega$ given by (\ref{KKS}), which can
be used to define an invariant volume form proportional to
$\omega^{d/2}$, where $d$ denotes the dimension of the orbit. But in
the case of $\hatBMS$, the orbits $\calO_p$ are infinite-dimensional
Virasoro orbits, so the question of the existence of a quasi-invariant
measure is much more involved, see
e.g.~\cite{Shavgulidze1997,Bogachev1998,Shimomura2001,Airault2001,Dai2004}. We
will not study this problem here, but hope that it will be settled in
the future.
\section{Conclusion}
\label{sec:conclusion}
In this work we have shown how the classification of coadjoint orbits
of the centrally extended $\hatBMS$ group controls solutions of
asymptotically flat Einstein gravity in three dimensions. Upon
geometric quantization, these orbits yield $\BMS$ particles,
i.e.~induced representations of the $\hatBMS$ group. This brings the
understanding of the relation between group-theoretic aspects of the
$\BMS$ group and flat space gravity to the same level as has been
achieved in the ${\rm AdS}_3$ case in
\cite{Nakatsu1999,Navarro-Salas1999,Garbarz:2014kaa}.
\section*{Acknowledgements}
\addcontentsline{toc}{section}{Acknowledgments}
We are grateful to D.~Pickrell and K.H.~Neeb for helpful comments on
quasi-invariant functional measures. B.O. would also like to thank
J.H.~Rawnsley for useful discussions on geometric quantization for
semi-direct product groups. This work is supported in part by the Fund
for Scientific Research-FNRS (Belgium), by IISN-Belgium, and by
``Communaut\'e fran\c caise de Belgique - Actions de Recherche
Concert\'ees''.
\section*{References}
\addcontentsline{toc}{section}{References}
\renewcommand{\section}[2]{
\def\cprime{$'$}
\providecommand{\href}[2]{#2}\begingroup\raggedright |
\section{Introduction}
\lettrine[lines=2]{W}{ith} the growing concern on global climate change, governments and industries have invested extensively in environmentally friendly technologies. The transportation sector is responsible for a large portion (24\%) of green house gas emission \cite{book/wiley/SLabatt2007}, which has been recognized as one of the major cause of global climate change. To alleviate such emissions, incentives have been provided to encourage the adoption of electric vehicles (EVs). The next-generation EVs have drawn the interest of researchers in recent years, as they have the capability of performing vehicle-to-grid (V2G) operation \cite{journals/tsg/YifengHe2012}. V2G technology \cite{journals/ep/HLund2008} is regarded as an important application of smart grid technology. An EV may be used as energy storage which allows the bi-directional electricity flow between the vehicle's battery and the electric power grid \cite{LamLeungLiCapacityManagementVehicle}\cite{LamHuangSilvaSaad2012MultilayerMarket}. V2G can efficiently flatten the load profile of the electric system with optimal scheduling of charging (grid-to-vehicle, G2V) and discharging (V2G) behavior, which can potentially reduce the total system running cost and green house gas emission \cite{journals/tcst/DongsukKum2013}.
Recently, a number of algorithms for scheduling the charging and discharging of electric vehicles have been proposed \cite{journals/tsg/YifengHe2012}\cite{conference/noms/KMets2010}\cite{conference/e2030/CHutson2008}\cite{journals/tie/AYSaber2011}\cite{journals/tsj/AYSaber2012}.
However, the algorithms proposed in \cite{conference/noms/KMets2010} and \cite{conference/e2030/CHutson2008} only consider EV charging during the scheduling process. Though \cite{journals/tie/AYSaber2011} and \cite{journals/tsj/AYSaber2012} involve V2G operation to minimize the cost, the consideration of system constraints, especially the EV-related constraints, is inadequate. In particular, they fail to take the features of EVs into consideration. The algorithm proposed in \cite{journals/tsg/YifengHe2012} is efficient in reducing the EV individual cost, but the authors did not take the system running cost into account. In particular, the Unit Commitment (UC) problem, or the scheduling of generator units, is ignored. In order to avoid these drawbacks and provide an integrated solution of the complete power system, we introduce UC into the optimal scheduling model and propose a new formulation of jointly scheduling of Electric Vehicle and Unit Commitment (EVUC).
Metaheuristic is a kind of general-purpose algorithm which optimizes problems in an iterative manner, trying to find or improve a candidate solution given a measure of quality. It is a very popular approach to solve UC-related problems \cite{journals/tie/AYSaber2011}\cite{journals/tps/PHChen2012}. Among all metaheuristics, Chemical Reaction Optimization (CRO) is a promising algorithm in solving combinatorial and continuous optimization problems \cite{journals/tec/AYSLam2010}. CRO mimics the behaviour of molecules in a chemical reaction. It has been used effectively in solving many real-world problems \cite{conference/cec/JYu2011ANN}\cite{conference/cec/JYu2012Sensor}. In this work, we use CRO to find optimal solutions of our proposed EVUC problem.
The main contribution of this paper is a new formulation of the joint scheduling of V2G and UC. Compared with previous formulations, our new formulation introduces additional constraints to make it more practical. We also perform simulations to demonstrate that CRO is a good method for solving this problem.
The rest of the paper is organized as follows. The related work is presented in Section II. Section III introduces the nomenclature we use in this paper. Section IV formulates the EVUC problem and the implementation of CRO to solve this problem is described in Section V. We will demonstrate the experiment instance and the simulation results in Section VI, accompanied with analysis and discussion. Finally we will conclude this paper in Section VII.
\section{Related Work}
Existing work of V2G operation scheduling of EVs can be divided into two classes: charging-only scheduling and bi-directional scheduling. In charging-only scheduling, the algorithms try to optimize the electricity flow from the power grid to the batteries of EVs. For example, Shrestha \textit{et al.} optimized the EV charging cycles to off-peak periods to flatten the demand curve, in order to reduce the charging cost \cite{conference/ipec/Shrestha2007}. Mets \textit{et al.} presented a smart energy control strategy to charge residential plug-in hybrid EVs (PHEVs) to smooth the system load profile \cite{conference/noms/KMets2010}. However, with the development of V2G technology, bi-directional charging, i.e., V2G and G2V, is possible, and bi-directional scheduling algorithm has attracted much research recently. The role of EVs in the power system may change during the day from loads to sources, and vice versa. Binary particle swarm optimization was employed to tackle the V2G scheduling problem to minimize the total running cost and reduce green house gas emission in \cite{journals/tie/AYSaber2011} and \cite{journals/tsj/AYSaber2012}. Han \textit{et al.} proposed an aggregator for V2G frequency regulation in \cite{journals/tsg/SHan2010}, aiming to maximize the revenue.
CRO is a recently proposed metaheuristic, which has been developed intensely in the past few years. CRO was originally designed to solve combinatorial optimization problems in \cite{journals/tec/AYSLam2010}, where CRO is adopted to solve the Quadratic Assignment Problem, the Resource-Constraint Project Scheduling Problem, and the Channel Assignment Problem. The Cognitive Radio Spectrum Allocation Problem is addressed in \cite{conference/globecom/AYSLam2010}. Yu \textit{et al.} proposed and solved a Sensor Deployment Problem with CRO in \cite{conference/cec/JYu2012Sensor}. Lam \textit{et al.} analyzed the convergence of CRO for combinatorial optimization in \cite{journals/tec/AYSLam2013Early}. Lam \textit{et al.} also proposed Real-Coded CRO, a variant of CRO, to solve continuous optimization problems in \cite{journals/tec/AYSLam2012}. Yu \textit{et al.} solved an Artificial Neural Network training problem in \cite{conference/cec/JYu2011ANN}, and proposed several perturbation functions for RCCRO in \cite{conference/cec/JJQYu2012PF}.
Researchers have been using metaheuristics to solve UC and its related problems for many years. Mantawy \textit{et al.} proposed a hybrid algorithm integrating genetic algorithm, tabu search and simulated annealing to solve UC in \cite{journals/tps/Mantawy1999}. Rajan \textit{et al.} proposed an evolutionary programming-based tabu search method for the same problem in \cite{journals/tps/Rajan2004}. Yousuf \textit{et al.} proposed a binary particle swarm optimization to solve the UC with renewable energy sources in \cite{journals/tsj/AYSaber2012}. Chen proposed an expert system with elite particle swarm optimization algorithm to solve UC in \cite{journals/tps/PHChen2012}. As CRO has been applied to solve related power system optimization problems, e.g., \cite{SunLamLiXuYu2012ChemicalReactionOptimization}\cite{XuWenLiLeung2013OptimalPMUPlacement} and has demonstrated outstanding performance, we adopt CRO to solve this EVUC problem.
\section{Nomenclature}
\addcontentsline{toc}{section}{Nomenclature}
\begin{IEEEdescription}[\IEEEusemathlabelsep\IEEEsetlabelwidth{$a_i,b_i,c_i$}]
\item[$T$] Total number of time intervals.
\item[$t$] The index of a time interval.
\item[$\Delta t$] Length of a time interval.
\item[$I$] Total number of thermal units.
\item[$i$] The index of a thermal unit.
\item[$M$] Total number of EVs.
\item[$m$] The index of an EV.
\item[$P^t_i$] Power output of unit $i$ at time $t$.
\item[$U^t_i$] State of unit $i$ at time $t$. 1 is online and 0 is offline.
\item[$f^{FC}_i(P)$] Fuel cost of unit $i$ when generating $P$ power output.
\item[$UC_i$] Start-up cost of unit $i$.
\item[$DC_i$] Shut-down cost of unit $i$.
\item[$a_i,b_i,c_i$] Fuel cost coefficients of unit $i$.
\item[$\overline{P_i}$] Maximum power output of unit $i$.
\item[$\underline{P_i}$] Minimum power output of unit $i$.
\item[$\mathcal{T}_{i,mr}$] The set of time intervals when unit $i$ must be online.
\item[$\mathcal{T}_{i,mo}$] The set of time intervals when unit $i$ must be offline.
\item[$P^t_D$] System load demand at time $t$.
\item[$P^t_{SR}$] Spinning reserve at time $t$.
\item[$P^t_{EV}$] The amount of power discharged from EV through V2G at time $t$. A positive value represents discharging to the power grid (V2G) and a negative value represents charging from the power grid (G2V).
\item[$MUT_i$] Minimal uptime of unit $i$.
\item[$MDT_i$] Minimal downtime of unit $i$.
\item[$\tau^t_i$] The number of continuous online or offline time intervals before time $t$ for unit $i$. A possitive value represents online state and a negative represents offline state.
\item[$URR_i$] Maximum up-ramp rate limit of unit $i$.
\item[$DRR_i$] Maximum down-ramp rate limit of unit $i$.
\item[$E^{\textit{cap}}_m$] Battery capacity of EV $m$.
\item[$E^t_m$] The amount of electricity hold by EV $m$ at time $t$.
\item[$\textit{freq}_m$] Charging frequency of EV $m$.
\item[$\mathcal{T}^{\textit{charge}}$] The set of time intervals when EVs are charging from the power grid $\mathcal{T}^{\textit{charge}}=\{t|\forall P^t_{EV}<0\}$.
\item[$E^{\textit{con}}_m$] Total electricity consumed by EV $m$ in a complete scheduling period.
\end{IEEEdescription}
\section{EVUC Problem Formulation}\label{sec:problem}
The purpose of UC problem is to determine the schedule of the start up and shut down of power generator units, such that the total power output meets the fluctuating load over the scheduling period at minimal cost \cite{journals/tps/PHChen2012}. EVs connected to the grid can act as loads, sources, or energy storages. The EVUC problem can be formulated as a constrained nonlinear optimization problem if we divide the scheduling period into time intervals as follows:
\begin{equation}\label{eqn:objective}
\begin{aligned}
\min_{P^t_i}\sum^T_{t=1}\sum^I_{i=1}[f^{FC}_i(P^t_i)U^t_i&+UC_i(1-U^{t-1}_i)U^t_i\\
&+DC_iU^{t-1}_i(1-U^t_i)],\\
\text{over }P^t_i\text{ for }i=1,2,\cdots&,I,\hspace{0.5em}t=1,2,\cdots,T.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
In power systems, the fuel cost of a thermal unit is usually formulated as a quadratic function:
\begin{equation}\label{eqn:fuelcost}
f^{FC}_i(P)=a_i+b_iP+c_iP^2.
\end{equation}
This objective function of EVUC is subject to two classes of constraints: UC and EV constraints. The former constraints are introduced by the original UC problem \cite{journals/tps/PHChen2012} and the latter ones are introduced due to the special characteristics of EVs.
\subsection{UC Constraints}
When considering UC constraints, we can consider the collection of EVs as a new type of unit which can generate or consume power at different times.
\subsubsection{Generation Constraints}
Every online unit has generation limits:
\begin{equation}\label{eqn:generationconst}
\underline{P_i}\leq P^t_i\leq \overline{P_i}\hspace{1em}i=1,2,\cdots,I,\hspace{0.5em}t=1,2,\cdots,T.
\end{equation}
\subsubsection{Must-run and Must-off Units}
Sometimes units are assigned to be in a must-run or must-off status to meet different requirements:
\begin{equation}\label{eqn:mrandmo}
\begin{aligned}
U^t_i=1\hspace{1em}\text{for } t\in\mathcal{T}_{i,mr}\\
U^t_i=0\hspace{1em}\text{for } t\in\mathcal{T}_{i,mo}
\end{aligned}.
\end{equation}
\subsubsection{System Power Balance}
The generation and demand of the system must be identical:
\begin{equation}\label{eqn:powerbalance}
\sum^I_{i=1}P^t_iU^t_i+P^t_{EV}-P^t_D=0\hspace{1em}t=1,2,\cdots,T.
\end{equation}
\subsubsection{Spinning Reserve Constraints}
In order to prevent power supply interruptions, an adequate amount of spinning reserve is essential for a power system:
\begin{equation}\label{eqn:spinningreserve}
\begin{aligned}
\sum^I_{i=1}\overline{P_i}U^t_i+P^t_{EV}-P^t_D-&P^t_{SR}\geq0\\
&\hspace{1em}t=1,2,\cdots,T
\end{aligned}.
\end{equation}
\subsubsection{Minimal Uptime and Downtime}
A unit must be online or offline for a certain number of time intervals before it can be shut down or started up:
\begin{equation}\label{eqn:mutmdt}
\begin{aligned}
\tau^t_i\geq\textit{MUT}_i\times &U^{t-1}_i(1-U^t_i)\\
-\tau^t_i\geq\textit{MDT}_i\times &(1-U^{t-1}_i)U^t_i\\
&\hspace{1em}i=1,2,\cdots,I,\hspace{0.5em}t=1,2,\cdots,T
\end{aligned}.
\end{equation}
\subsubsection{Ramp Rate Limit}
A unit cannot change its power output too rapidly. The range is constrained by the ramp rate limits:
\begin{equation}\label{eqn:ramprate}
\begin{aligned}
P^t_i-P^{t-1}_i\leq \textit{URR}_i\hspace{1em}i=1,2,\cdots,I,\hspace{0.5em}t=1,2,\cdots,T\\
P^{t-1}_i-P^t_i\leq \textit{DRR}_i\hspace{1em}i=1,2,\cdots,I,\hspace{0.5em}t=1,2,\cdots,T
\end{aligned}.
\end{equation}
\subsection{EV Constraints}
\subsubsection{Capacity Limit}
The total amount of electricity which can be stored in the EVs is limited by the capacity of the batteries in the EVs:
\begin{equation}\label{eqn:capacity}
\sum^M_{m=1}E^{\textit{cap}}_m-\sum^M_{m=1}E^t_m\geq0\hspace{1em}t=1,2,\cdots,T.
\end{equation}
\subsubsection{Charging Frequency Limit}
In order to save the battery life, it is suggested to limit the charging frequency of EVs \cite{journals/tie/Chen2013}. So the maximum amount of electricity charged to EVs is limited:
\begin{equation}\label{eqn:chargefreq}
\sum_{t\in\mathcal{T}^{\textit{charge}}}P^t_{EV}\times\Delta t\leq\sum^M_{m=1}(E^{\textit{cap}}_m\times\textit{freq}_m).
\end{equation}
\subsubsection{Battery Electricity Balance}
The total electricity stored in the batteries of EVs shall remain the same after a complete scheduling period, otherwise the EV system may have all its electricity depleted, or charged to capacity, rendering it incapable of providing regulation service. In this process, the energy consumed by EVs themselves shall also be considered. Assume that the total number of EVs in the system, i.e., $m$, is constant during the scheduling period. This constraint is formulated as follows:
\begin{equation}\label{eqn:batterybalance}
\sum^T_{t=1}P^t_{EV}\times\Delta t+\sum^M_{m=1}E^{\textit{con}}_m=0.
\end{equation}
\section{Algorithm Design}
In this section, we will first briefly review CRO. Then the detailed implementation of our proposed methodology will be presented.
\subsection{A Brief Review of CRO}
CRO mimics the behavior of molecules in a chemical reaction. Consider a closed container with some molecules. Each molecule has a molecular structure, which is used to represent a feasible solution, and different kinds of energy, which represent some solution quality-related parameters. As time evolves, the molecules move around randomly and collide with the container wall or with each other. The collisions modify the molecular structures of participated molecules according to some predefined rules. If the modification caused by the collision accords with the energy conservation law, then the modification is accepted and the molecular structure, i.e., a feasible solution, is potentially improved. CRO utilizes this kind of modifications to perform optimization tasks.
In CRO, there are four kinds of elementary reactions, namely, on-wall ineffective collision (\textit{on-wall}), decomposition (\textit{dec}), inter-molecular ineffective collision (\textit{inter}), and synthesis (\textit{syn}). In each iteration of CRO, only one out of these four elementary reactions will occur. Among these elementary reactions, \textit{on-wall} and \textit{dec} take one molecule as input (parent molecule) while \textit{inter} and \textit{syn} take two molecules. \textit{on-wall} and \textit{syn} employ the input molecule(s) to generate one output (child molecule) while \textit{dec} and \textit{inter} generate two. The occurrence of these elementary reactions are controlled by different parameters. Although they are quite different in terms of inputs and outputs, they share a common characteristic which distinguishes CRO with other metaheuristics. All elementary reactions satisfy the energy conservation law, i.e., the energy in the whole system remains the same before and after the elementary reaction. Interested readers can refer to \cite{journals/tec/AYSLam2010}\cite{journals/mc/AYSLam2012} for details.
\subsection{Encoding Scheme}
As stated in Section \ref{sec:problem}, we use $T$ to represent the total number of time intervals and $I$ to represent the set of units. So we can use a $T\times I$ binary matrix to represent the schedule of online status of thermal units, where 1's stand for online and 0's for offline. Besides this typical encoding scheme for a canonical UC problem, we also append a vector of length $T$ to represent the power output of all EVs. So a typical solution $s$ for the EVUC problem is composed of two parts: an UC part and an EV part as follows:
\begin{center}
\[
\begin{array}{c@{}c}
s =
\left[
\begin{array}{ccccc}
U^1_1 & U^1_2 & \cdots & U^1_I & P^1_{EV}\\
U^2_1 & U^2_2 & \cdots & U^2_I & P^2_{EV}\\
\vdots & \vdots & \ddots & \vdots & \vdots \\
U^T_1 & U^T_2 & \cdots & U^T_I & P^T_{EV}\\
\end{array}
\right].
&\\
\hspace{0.5cm}\hexbrace{3.4cm}{\text{UC}}\hexbrace{1.1cm}{\text{EV}}
\end{array}
\]
\end{center}
\subsection{Initial Solution Generation}
As a feasible solution of EVUC can be divided into two parts, we initialize them separately. Instead of randomly generating binary numbers for the UC part (as is usually the case when using metaheuristic to solve other optimization problems), we use a heuristic proposed in \cite{journals/tps/PHChen2012} to generate this part. Note that this heuristic, or so-called ``Expert System Pre-dispatch" cannot guarantee the solutions generated have good performance. For the EV part, we will dispatch the EV charges evenly without violating the constraints.
The main idea of the initial solution generator of the UC part proposed in \cite{journals/tps/PHChen2012} is that an initial solution will go through all UC constraints to check whether any violation occurs. When a solution violates any constraint, it will be repaired using some predefined ``rules". This process can be further divided into three steps: a) check Constraint (\ref{eqn:mrandmo}), b) check Constraint (\ref{eqn:spinningreserve}), and c) check Constraint (\ref{eqn:mutmdt}). Other UC constraints will be satisfied in the process of Economic Dispatch (ED), which will be introduced later. Interested reader can refer to \cite{journals/tps/PHChen2012} for details of this initial solution generation heuristic.
However, this method has a serious drawback. As the steps previously stated are performed sequentially, it is highly likely that the repair function in Step c may potentially make the solution violate Constraint (\ref{eqn:spinningreserve}) again, despite this solution has just passed the checks in Steps a and b. Here is an example. Suppose a thermal unit $i$ with $MUT_i=MDT_i=3$. The unit state of unit $i$ in a solution which just passed Step a and b check is $[\cdots,1,1,1,\underline{1},0,0,\underline{1},1,1,1,\cdots]^\intercal$. As this sequence does not satisfy $MDT_i$, either state of the two underscored time intervals must be changed to 0. However, this change potentially decreases the maximum power output of this time interval, which may in return violate Constraint (\ref{eqn:spinningreserve}). Moreover, as there is no feedback scheme in this method, this violation will still be retained without repair and the solution becomes infeasible. In order to overcome this drawback, we add a simple recursive scheme to the original method: every solution after going through all the steps will go through these checks again sequentially until no violation is found. As this recursion is a time-consuming task, we will discard this solution and generate a new one if the solution still cannot pass all the constraint checks after 10 recursions. Thus we can guarantee the UC part of our generated initial solution satisfy Constraints (\ref{eqn:mrandmo}), (\ref{eqn:spinningreserve}), and (\ref{eqn:mutmdt}).
For the EV part of an initial solution, we suppose that no smart operation, i.e., having EVs as storages or sources, occurs in the scheduling period. So the total amount of electricity charged to the EVs is $\sum^M_{m=1}E^{\textit{con}}_m$. This amount is first evenly distributed to all time intervals. Then we check this solution against Constraint (\ref{eqn:spinningreserve}), which is the only constraint this solution may violate. If this constraint is violated, then we calculate the excessive electricity $E_{ex}$ at time $t_{ex}$ when the maximum power output of all online thermal units cannot satisfy the requirement of demand and spinning reserve:
\begin{equation}\label{eqn:excessev}
\begin{aligned}
E_{ex}=P^t_D+&P^t_{SR}-P^t_{EV}-\sum^{|\mathcal{I}|}_{i=1}\overline{P_i}U^t_i.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
This excessive electricity then is divided evenly and dispatched to all time intervals whose maximum power outputs can satisfy the spinning reserve requirement. This process repeats until no time interval violates constraint (\ref{eqn:spinningreserve}). Here is an example. Suppose there are three thermal units with $\overline{P}=[100,100,100]^\intercal$, the demands and spinning reserves of the three time intervals are $P^t_D+P^t_{SR}=[80,290,170]^\intercal$, and $\sum^M_{m=1}E^{\textit{con}}_m=50$. After the first step of even dispatch, a possible solution is:
\begin{center}
\[
\left[
\begin{array}{cccc}
1&0&0&-16.667\\
1&1&1&-16.667\\
1&1&0&-16.667
\end{array}
\right]
\Rightarrow
\left[
\begin{array}{cccc}
1&0&0&-20\\
1&1&1&-10\\
1&1&0&-20
\end{array}
\right].
\]
\end{center}
However, the excessive electricity in the second time interval violates Constraint (\ref{eqn:spinningreserve}). So the excessive electricity $E_{ex}=290-(-16.667)-300=6.667$ is dispatched to the other two time intervals, rendering the solution feasible. Up to now there is no smart operation in our initial solution. The Constraints (\ref{eqn:capacity}), (\ref{eqn:chargefreq}), and (\ref{eqn:batterybalance}) are naturally satisfied, otherwise the EVs in the system would not have enough electricity to function, and this is not an acceptable situation.
\subsection{Neighborhood Search Operator}
The neighborhood search operator, which modifies one feasible solution and attempts to find another one, is employed in all four elementary reactions in our CRO implementation for this problem. As each solution can be divided into two parts, we will modify them separately.
\subsubsection{UC Part Modification}
At the beginning, the neighborhood search operator will first generate a random position in the $T\times I$ binary matrix except those must-run and most-off positions. The state in this position is then toggled, i.e., $U^t_i\leftarrow1-U^t_i$. Then the newly generated solution will be checked against Constraints (\ref{eqn:spinningreserve}) and (\ref{eqn:mutmdt}). If either one of the constraints is violated, the modification is discarded and the solution is reverted to the original state. In such cases, the algorithm will go on to modify the EV output values. However, if the algorithm successfully modifies one position in the UC part without violating the constraints, the EV output values will not be changed. An example of the operation of this neighborhood search operator is as follows:
\begin{center}
\[
\left[
\begin{array}{cccc}
1&\textbf{0}&0&-20\\
1&1&1&-10\\
1&1&0&-20
\end{array}
\right]
\Rightarrow
\left[
\begin{array}{cccc}
1&\textbf{1}&0&-20\\
1&1&1&-10\\
1&1&0&-20
\end{array}
\right]
\]
\end{center}
where the neighborhood search operator toggles the state of the second unit on the first time interval from offline to online, which is bolded in the above transformation.
\subsubsection{EV Part Modification}
If the UC part modification does not successfully change any state, the algorithm will modify the EV part values. In order not to violate Constraint (\ref{eqn:batterybalance}), the sum of all EV output values shall keep unchanged. So we first select two random time intervals $t_{inc}$ and $t_{dec}$ from $T$, assign one of them to be the time interval for which we decide to increase the EV output (increase V2G or decrease G2V), and the other to be the time interval for decreasing the EV output. As Constraint (\ref{eqn:spinningreserve}) limits the maximum power that the selected outputs can increase/decrease, we first determine the increase/decrease range $r$ as
\begin{equation}\label{eqn:incrange}
\begin{aligned}
r=&\min(P^{t_{\textit{inc}}}_D-P^{t_{\textit{inc}}}_EV-\sum^{|\mathcal{I}|}_{i=1}(\underline{P_i}),\\
&\sum^{|\mathcal{I}|}_{i=1}(\overline{P_i})+P^{t_{\textit{dec}}}_EV-P^{t_{\textit{dec}}}_D-P^{t_{\textit{inc}}}_{SR}).
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
The first term in the \textit{min} operator is the maximum increase range for $t_\textit{{inc}}$ and the second term is the maximum decrease range for $t_{\textit{dec}}$. With this range, we draw a random increase/decrease value $v\sim N(0, r/3)$. If the absolute value of $v$ is larger than $r$, this $v$ will be discarded and we randomly draw another one from the distribution. This process will iterate until a feasible $|v|\in[0, r]$ is drawn. This $v$ is then applied to modify the EV output values of the two previously selected time intervals, i.e.,
\begin{equation}\label{eqn:incdec}
\begin{aligned}
P^{t_{inc}}_{EV}\leftarrow P^{t_{inc}}_{EV}+|v|&\\
P^{t_{dec}}_{EV}\leftarrow P^{t_{dec}}_{EV}-|v|&.\\
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
This operation may violate Constraints (\ref{eqn:capacity}) and (\ref{eqn:chargefreq}). In such cases, this modification on EV output values is reverted and the neighborhood search operator will do nothing in the current elementary reaction.
\subsection{Elementary Reactions}
In our proposed methodology, we employ the neighborhood search operator in all four elementary reactions, namely \textit{on-wall}, \textit{dec}, \textit{inter}, and \textit{syn}. For \textit{on-wall}, the neighborhood search operator can be employed as described before. For \textit{dec}, we first copy the input molecular structure to the two output molecules, and then perform neighborhood search on them separately. We treat \textit{inter} as two \textit{on-walls} occurring simultaneously. Finally, for \textit{syn}, we compare the performance of the two input solutions, pick the better one, and perform the neighborhood search on it.
\subsection{Economic Dispatch}
Up to now our solution is a binary matrix and a real-number vector. However the EVUC problem requires the power outputs of the units instead of the online status. So the algorithm must dispatch the load demand to all online units, and this process is called Economic Dispatch (ED) \cite{journals/tps/Chowdhury1990}. In EVUC, we use the lambda iteration method for economic dispatch in the UC problem as this method is guaranteed to find the optimal ED solution with a small enough estimation error \cite{journals/tps/Su2000}.
\section{Simulation Results and Discussion}
Our proposed approach was implemented in C++ on an Intel Core i5 3.1-GHz processor with MinGW compiler. We analyze the efficiency of V2G as well as the performance of CRO with a test system of up to 40 units.
\subsection{Testing Instance}
\begin{table}[t]
\centering
\caption{Capacity and Cost Coefficients of Thermal Units}
\begin{tabular}{rrrrrr}
\hline
Unit & $\overline{P_i}$(MW) & $\underline{P_i}$(MW) & $a_i$(\$/h) & $b_i$(\$/MWh) & $c_i$(\$/MWh$^2$) \\
\hline
1 & 455 & 150 & 1000 & 16.19 & 0.00048 \\
2 & 455 & 150 & 970 & 17.26 & 0.00031 \\
3 & 130 & 20 & 700 & 16.6 & 0.002 \\
4 & 130 & 20 & 680 & 16.5 & 0.00211 \\
5 & 162 & 25 & 450 & 19.7 & 0.00398 \\
6 & 80 & 20 & 370 & 22.26 & 0.00712 \\
7 & 85 & 25 & 480 & 27.74 & 0.0079 \\
8 & 55 & 10 & 660 & 25.92 & 0.00413 \\
9 & 55 & 10 & 665 & 27.27 & 0.00222 \\
10 & 55 & 10 & 670 & 27.79 & 0.00173 \\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\label{tab:unit1}
\end{table}
In our simulation, an independent system operator (ISO) of a 10-unit system is considered with 50 000 GVs. This ISO has been considered in many investigations \cite{journals/tie/AYSaber2011}\cite{journals/tsj/AYSaber2012}\cite{journals/tps/PHChen2012}. We consider a 24-hour scheduling horizon. Table \ref{tab:unit1} gives the capacity and cost coefficients of these thermal units and Table \ref{tab:unit2} gives the time-dependent parameters of these thermal units. In this system, the system reserve is set to 10\% of the total demand (load demand and EV charging demand), the shut down cost is ignored, and the start-up cost is calculated using
\begin{equation}\label{eqn:hotstart}
UC_i=
\left\{
\begin{aligned}
& UC^{\textit{hot}}_i & MDT_i\leq -\tau^t_i\leq MDT_i+T^{cold}_i\\
& UC^{\textit{cold}}_i & -\tau^t_i> MDT_i+T^{cold}_i
\end{aligned}
\right.
\end{equation}
where $T^{cold}_i$ is the extra time needed for unit $i$ to completely cool down besides $MDT_i$. So the start-up cost is temperature dependent where a cold unit requires $UC^{\textit{cold}}$ to start-up while a warm unit requires less cost $UC^{\textit{hot}}$. The load demands for the 24 hours are presented in Table \ref{tab:demand}. This load profile does not include the energy consumed by EVs.
\begin{table}[t]
\centering
\caption{Time-dependent Parameters of Thermal Units}
\begin{tabular}{rrrrrrr}
\hline
Unit & $MUT_i$ & $MDT_i$ & $\tau^1_i$(h) & $UC^{\textit{hot}}_i$(\$) & $UC^{\textit{cold}}_i$(\$) & $T^{\textit{cold}}_i$(h) \\
\hline
1 & 8 & 8 & 5 & 4500 & 9000 & 8 \\
2 & 8 & 8 & 5 & 5000 & 10000 & 8 \\
3 & 5 & 5 & 4 & 550 & 1100 & -5 \\
4 & 5 & 5 & 4 & 560 & 1120 & -5 \\
5 & 6 & 6 & 4 & 900 & 1800 & -6 \\
6 & 3 & 3 & 2 & 170 & 340 & -3 \\
7 & 3 & 3 & 2 & 260 & 520 & -3 \\
8 & 1 & 1 & 0 & 30 & 60 & -1 \\
9 & 1 & 1 & 0 & 30 & 60 & -1 \\
10 & 1 & 1 & 0 & 30 & 60 & -1 \\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\label{tab:unit2}
\end{table}
\begin{table}[t]
\centering
\caption{System Load Demand (Without EVs Demand, in MW)}
\begin{tabular}{rrrrrrrrr}
\hline
Hour & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5 & 6 & 7 & 8 \\
Demand & 700 & 750 & 850 & 950 & 1000 & 1100 & 1150 & 1200 \\
\hline
Hour & 9 & 10 & 11 & 12 & 13 & 14 & 15 & 16 \\
Demand & 1300 & 1400 & 1450 & 1500 & 1400 & 1300 & 1200 & 1050 \\
\hline
Hour & 17 & 18 & 19 & 20 & 21 & 22 & 23 & 24 \\
Demand & 1000 & 1100 & 1200 & 1400 & 1300 & 1100 & 900 & 800 \\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\label{tab:demand}
\end{table}
In order to have a complete assessment of the proposed algorithm, we also made a 20- and 40-unit system by duplicating the 10-unit system and scaling the load demands as well as the system capacity (in terms of EV number) in proportion to the system size. For 20-unit system, there are 100 000 EVs and the load demand for the first hour is 1 400 MW. Such configuration is also studied in \cite{journals/tps/PHChen2012}.
The EV parameter values used in this paper are as follows: average EV battery capacity $\overline{EV^{\textit{cap}}}=15$kWh, charging frequency $\textit{freq}=1.0$, and average EV energy consumption over 24 hours $\overline{EV^{\textit{con}}}=8.22$kWh. All these numbers are adopted from \cite{journals/tie/AYSaber2011}. The parameter values for CRO to solve EVUC are listed in Table \ref{tab:param}. We select these parameter values using a trial-and-error method, which has been used in \cite{journals/tec/AYSLam2010}\cite{conference/cec/JJQYu2012PF}.
\begin{table}[t]
\centering
\caption{CRO Parameter Values}
\begin{tabular}{rr}
\hline
Parameter & Value \\
\hline
Initial population size & 5 \\
Initial molecular kinetic energy & 100 \\
Initial central energy buffer size & 0 \\
Collision rate & 0.05 \\
Energy loss rate & 0.05 \\
Decomposition threshold & 10 000 \\
Synthesis threshold & 100 000 \\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\label{tab:param}
\end{table}
\begin{table*}[t]
\centering
\caption{Best Scheduling and Dispatch of 10-Unit System without V2G using CRO}
\begin{tabular}{r|rrrrrrrrrr|r|rr}
\hline
h\textbackslash{}unit & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5 & 6 & 7 & 8 & 9 & 10 & V2G & Load & Reserve \\
\hline
1 & 455.00 & 324.98 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & -79.98 & 700 & 16.67\% \\
2 & 455.00 & 324.65 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & -29.65 & 750 & 16.72\% \\
3 & 455.00 & 324.33 & 130.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & -59.33 & 850 & 14.37\% \\
4 & 455.00 & 324.77 & 130.00 & 130.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & -89.77 & 950 & 12.52\% \\
5 & 455.00 & 324.19 & 130.00 & 130.00 & 25.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & -64.19 & 1000 & 25.17\% \\
6 & 455.00 & 360.00 & 130.00 & 130.00 & 25.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 1100 & 21.09\% \\
7 & 455.00 & 410.02 & 130.00 & 130.00 & 25.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & -0.02 & 1150 & 15.82\% \\
8 & 455.00 & 455.00 & 130.00 & 130.00 & 30.01 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & -0.01 & 1200 & 11.00\% \\
9 & 455.00 & 455.00 & 130.00 & 130.00 & 85.00 & 20.00 & 25.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 1300 & 15.15\% \\
10 & 455.00 & 455.00 & 130.00 & 130.00 & 162.00 & 33.00 & 25.00 & 10.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 1400 & 10.86\% \\
11 & 455.00 & 455.00 & 130.00 & 130.00 & 162.00 & 73.00 & 25.00 & 10.00 & 0.00 & 10.00 & 0.00 & 1450 & 10.83\% \\
12 & 455.00 & 455.00 & 130.00 & 130.00 & 162.00 & 80.00 & 25.00 & 43.00 & 10.00 & 10.00 & 0.00 & 1500 & 10.80\% \\
13 & 455.00 & 455.00 & 130.00 & 130.00 & 162.00 & 33.01 & 25.00 & 10.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & -0.01 & 1400 & 10.86\% \\
14 & 455.00 & 455.00 & 130.00 & 130.00 & 85.02 & 20.00 & 25.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & -0.02 & 1300 & 15.15\% \\
15 & 455.00 & 455.00 & 130.00 & 130.00 & 30.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 1200 & 11.00\% \\
16 & 455.00 & 323.64 & 130.00 & 130.00 & 25.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & -13.64 & 1050 & 25.23\% \\
17 & 455.00 & 324.47 & 130.00 & 130.00 & 25.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & -64.47 & 1000 & 25.13\% \\
18 & 455.00 & 360.06 & 130.00 & 130.00 & 25.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & -0.06 & 1100 & 21.08\% \\
19 & 455.00 & 440.01 & 130.00 & 130.00 & 25.00 & 20.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & -0.01 & 1200 & 17.67\% \\
20 & 455.00 & 455.00 & 130.00 & 130.00 & 162.00 & 33.01 & 25.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 10.00 & -0.01 & 1400 & 10.86\% \\
21 & 455.00 & 455.00 & 130.00 & 130.00 & 85.02 & 20.00 & 25.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & -0.02 & 1300 & 15.15\% \\
22 & 455.00 & 455.00 & 130.00 & 0.00 & 35.00 & 0.00 & 25.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 1100 & 17.00\% \\
23 & 455.00 & 324.79 & 130.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & -9.79 & 900 & 14.31\% \\
24 & 455.00 & 345.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 800 & 13.75\% \\
\hline
\multicolumn{14}{c}{Expected running cost = \$572467.30}\\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\label{tab:bestlevelCRO}
\end{table*}
\begin{table*}[t]
\centering
\caption{Best Scheduling and Dispatch of 10-Unit System with V2G using CRO}
\begin{tabular}{r|rrrrrrrrrr|r|rr}
\hline
h\textbackslash{}unit & 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5 & 6 & 7 & 8 & 9 & 10 & V2G & Load & Reserve \\
\hline
1 & 455.00 & 372.27 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & -127.27 & 700 & 10.00\% \\
2 & 455.00 & 372.26 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & -77.26 & 750 & 10.00\% \\
3 & 455.00 & 401.42 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 10.00 & -16.42 & 850 & 11.38\% \\
4 & 455.00 & 455.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 39.99 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.01 & 950 & 12.84\% \\
5 & 455.00 & 401.16 & 130.00 & 130.00 & 25.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & -141.16 & 1000 & 16.72\% \\
6 & 455.00 & 399.44 & 130.00 & 130.00 & 25.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & -39.44 & 1100 & 16.90\% \\
7 & 455.00 & 410.00 & 130.00 & 130.00 & 25.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 1150 & 15.83\% \\
8 & 455.00 & 455.00 & 130.00 & 130.00 & 30.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 1200 & 11.00\% \\
9 & 455.00 & 455.00 & 130.00 & 130.00 & 93.17 & 0.00 & 25.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 11.83 & 1300 & 10.00\% \\
10 & 455.00 & 455.00 & 130.00 & 130.00 & 145.89 & 20.00 & 25.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 39.11 & 1400 & 10.00\% \\
11 & 455.00 & 455.00 & 130.00 & 130.00 & 145.90 & 20.00 & 25.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 89.10 & 1450 & 10.00\% \\
12 & 455.00 & 455.00 & 130.00 & 130.00 & 154.25 & 20.00 & 25.00 & 10.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 120.75 & 1500 & 12.53\% \\
13 & 455.00 & 455.00 & 130.00 & 130.00 & 145.89 & 20.00 & 25.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 39.11 & 1400 & 10.00\% \\
14 & 455.00 & 455.00 & 130.00 & 130.00 & 84.99 & 20.00 & 25.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.01 & 1300 & 15.15\% \\
15 & 455.00 & 455.00 & 130.00 & 130.00 & 30.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 1200 & 11.00\% \\
16 & 455.00 & 400.90 & 130.00 & 130.00 & 25.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & -90.90 & 1050 & 16.75\% \\
17 & 455.00 & 401.24 & 130.00 & 130.00 & 25.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & -141.24 & 1000 & 16.72\% \\
18 & 455.00 & 403.51 & 130.00 & 130.00 & 25.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & -43.51 & 1100 & 16.48\% \\
19 & 455.00 & 440.07 & 130.00 & 130.00 & 25.00 & 20.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & -0.07 & 1200 & 17.66\% \\
20 & 455.00 & 455.00 & 130.00 & 130.00 & 145.91 & 20.00 & 25.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 39.09 & 1400 & 10.00\% \\
21 & 455.00 & 455.00 & 130.00 & 130.00 & 85.00 & 20.00 & 25.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 1300 & 15.15\% \\
22 & 455.00 & 455.00 & 130.00 & 0.00 & 35.00 & 0.00 & 25.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 1100 & 17.00\% \\
23 & 455.00 & 360.45 & 130.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & -45.45 & 900 & 10.00\% \\
24 & 455.00 & 372.27 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & 0.00 & -27.27 & 800 & 10.00\% \\
\hline
\multicolumn{14}{c}{Expected running cost = \$564727.87}\\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\label{tab:bestsmartCRO}
\end{table*}
\subsection{Analysis on V2G Efficiency}
In order to demonstrate the advantage of our V2G scheme compared with the current EV charging-only scheduling scheme, we propose and investigate two models representing the two schemes, respectively.
\subsubsection{Load-Leveling Model}
In this model, EVs are charged through thermal units using load-leveling optimization. No V2G operations are made. In this model, Constraint (\ref{eqn:chargefreq}) in EVUC becomes
\begin{equation}\label{eqn:loadlevel}
P^t_{EV}\leq0\hspace{1em}t=1,2,\cdots,T.
\end{equation}
The simulation results for this model is presented in Table \ref{tab:bestlevelCRO}.
\subsubsection{V2G Model}
In this model, EVs are charged through thermal units as loads and discharged to the grid as sources. The simulation results for this model is presented in Table \ref{tab:bestsmartCRO}.
From Tables \ref{tab:bestlevelCRO} and \ref{tab:bestsmartCRO} we can see that, the total running cost is reduced by \$7738.63 every 24-hour cycle, due to V2G operations. This phenomenon can also be observed in the simulations on the 20- and 40-unit systems, whose results are presented in Table \ref{tab:compmodel}. All the simulation results show that introducing V2G technology to existing power system can effectively reduce the running cost.
\begin{table}[t]
\centering
\caption{Best Running Cost Comparison between Two Models}
\begin{tabular}{rrrr}
\hline
Units & Load Leveling & V2G & difference \\
\hline
10 & \$572,467.30 & \$564,727.87 & -\$7,739.43 \\
20 & \$1,145,196.73 & \$1,128,131.28 & -\$17,065.45 \\
40 & \$2,286,394.59 & \$2,257,690.96 & -\$28703.63 \\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\label{tab:compmodel}
\end{table}
\subsection{Comparing CRO with Other Metaheuristics}
In order to demonstrate the superiority of CRO in solving EVUC, we compare the simulation result of CRO with other metaheuristics on 10-, 20-, and 40-unit systems. The selected metaheuristics are all algorithms with excellent performance in solving UC and related problems. These are EP \cite{journals/tps/Juste1999}, QIEA \cite{journals/tps/Lau2009}, SA \cite{conference/psce/Simo2006}, LRPSO \cite{conference/pmaps/Logen2010}, and ES-EPSO \cite{journals/tps/PHChen2012}. As there is no published results on our proposed EVUC problem, we implement these algorithms according to the description in the corresponding literature. The function evaluation limit is set to 50 000. The parameter values are selected according to the published records. Every algorithm is tested over all systems for 100 times. The simulation results are presented in Table \ref{tab:simres}.
\begin{table}[t]
\centering
\caption{Comparison of Solution Performance of CRO and Other Algorithms}
\begin{tabular}{rrrrr}
\hline
Units & Algorithm & Best Cost(\$) & Mean Cost(\$) & Mean Time(s) \\
\hline
10 & CRO & \textbf{564,727.87} & \textbf{565,019.42} & 2.02 \\
& EP & 566,016.44 & 569,217.98 & 1.99 \\
& QIEA & 565,294.13 & 565,364.46 & 2.17 \\
& SA & 567,639.85 & 568,249.21 & 2.09 \\
& LRPSO & 566,912.80 & 567,438.57 & 2.85 \\
& ES-EPSO & 565,047.61 & 565,497.39 & 2.96 \\
\hline
20 & CRO & \textbf{1,128,131.28} & \textbf{1,129,473.01} & 3.48 \\
& EP & 1,131,524.73 & 1,136,132.33 & 3.44 \\
& QIEA & 1,130,148.48 & 1,130,578.16 & 3.7 \\
& SA & 1,134,861.47 & 1,136,905.79 & 3.61 \\
& LRPSO & 1,133,126.98 & 1,133,913.37 & 5.41 \\
& ES-EPSO & 1,129,632.35 & 1,130,975.40 & 5.69 \\
\hline
40 & CRO & \textbf{2,257,690.96} & \textbf{2,259,279.49} & 5.99 \\
& EP & 2,263,546.88 & 2,272,957.50 & 5.95 \\
& QIEA & 2,260,964.88 & 2,261,157.61 & 6.31 \\
& SA & 2,269,970.59 & 2,273,957.16 & 6.22 \\
& LRPSO & 2,266,485.37 & 2,267,800.28 & 10.32 \\
& ES-EPSO & 2,259,141.88 & 2,261,421.76 & 10.8 \\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\label{tab:simres}
\end{table}
From the results we can see CRO outperforms other algorithms in every test on both the comparison of best cost and the mean cost. The superiority is enhanced when the problem size increases. In terms of computational time, EP is the fastest algorithm but the advantage over CRO is negligible. Almost 95\% the of total time of CRO, EP, QIEA, and SA is employed to solve ED using the lambda iteration method, which is not avoidable in all UC simulations. As to LRPSO and ES-EPSO, the relatively high computational complexities of the algorithms make them less competitive.
\section{Conclusion}
In this paper, we propose a new optimization problem, namely, joint scheduling of EVs and UC, called EVUC. Our formulation can overcome the drawbacks of previous formulations. The main idea of the problem is to employ EVs as power sources and storages at different times, instead of only using them as loads. The major improvement of our formulation with previous formulations is that we consider the special characteristics of EVs while optimizing the total system running cost. This improvement makes our model more realistic and also more effective at reducing the total system running cost. In order to assess the efficiency of our formulation, we employ CRO to solve the optimization problem. The simulation results indicate that our proposed scheduling algorithm can significantly reduce the running cost while maintaining sufficient spinning reserve to handle emergency situations. Moreover, we compare the simulation results of CRO with a wide range of other metaheuristics with excellent performance in solving similar problems in previous literature. CRO outperforms all other compared metaheuristics in terms of both the best cost and the mean cost, and the simulation time needed is among the shortest. All these phenomenon show that CRO is an efficient method for our proposed EVUC problem.
\bibliographystyle{IEEEtran}
|
\section{General Information}
\begin{figure}[htb!]
\begin{center}
{
\includegraphics[scale=0.25]{warkworth-panorama.pdf}
}
\caption{Photo of the two radio antennas at Warkworth on a frosty winters morning, on the left the 30-m and on the right the 12-m. In the background on the left hand side are the antennas belonging to Spark (formerly Telecom New Zealand). (Image courtesy of Stuart Weston)}
\label{fig:warkworth}
\end{center}
\end{figure}
The Warkworth Radio Astronomical Observatory for which a panorama photo is shown in Figure \ref{fig:warkworth} is located some 60 km north of the city of Auckland, near the township of Warkworth. Specifications of the Warkworth 12-m and 30-m antennas are provided in Table \ref{t:wark}. The 12-m radio telescope is equipped with an S/X dual-band dual-circular polarization feed at the secondary focus and an L-band feed at the prime focus. Backend data digitizing is handled by a digital base band converter (DBBC) manufactured by the HAT-Lab, Catania, Italy. The 30-m radio telescope is currently equipped with a un-cooled C band dual-circular polarization receiver. The station frequency standard is a Symmetricom Active Hydrogen Maser MHM-2010 (75001-114). Mark 5B+ and Mark 5C data recorders are used for data storage and streaming of recorded data off site. The observatory network is directly connected to the national network provided by Research and Education Advanced Network New Zealand Ltd (REANNZ) via a 10~Gbps fibre link to the site \cite{r:karen}.
\begin{table}[h]
\centering
\caption{Specifications of the Warkworth 12-m and 30-m antennas.}
\begin{tabular}{lll}
\hline
& 12-m & 30-m \\
\hline
Antenna type & Dual-shaped Cassegrain & wheel-and-track, Cassegrain\\
& & beam-waveguide \\
Manufacturer & Cobham/Patriot, USA & NEC, Japan \\
Main dish Diam. & 12.1 m & 30.48 m \\
Secondary refl. Diam. & 1.8 m & 2.715 m\\
Focal length & 4.538 m & \\
Surface accuracy & 0.35 mm & 1.2 mm\\
Mount & alt-azimuth & alt-azimuth \\
Azimuth axis range & $90^\circ \pm 270^\circ$ & $-179^\circ$ to $+354^\circ$ \\
Elevation axis range & $7.2^\circ$ to $88 ^\circ$ & $6.0^\circ$ to $90.1^\circ$\\
Azimuth axis max speed & $5^\circ$/s & $0.37^\circ$/s \\
Elevation axis max speed & $1^\circ$/s & $0.36^\circ$/s \\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\label{t:wark}
\end{table}
\section{Component Description}
\subsection{The 12-m antenna: Progress and issues}
In the beginning of 2014, a problem with slippage of the elevation axis encoder occurred. Initially, this issue could be dealt with by regenerating a pointing model on a fortnightly basis, but eventually it progressed to the point where a new model was required on an almost daily basis. It was determined that, as been the case at several other Patriot/Cobham 12-m antennas, the problem was caused by rotational slippage of the elevation axis pin connected to the encoder in the housing. As supplied by the manufacturer, this pin was intended to be locked to the main structure of the dish by an interface fit and convey rotational motion to the elevation encoder. A permanent solution that locks the pin to the structure of the dish through bolts drilled into the axis bearing pin appears to have been successful, we have not experienced any more drift and the elevation encoder offset has since been stable.
A new DBBC was received in April 2014 and was used to replace the original one purchased for the 12-m. This allowed the original DBBC to be returned to Bonn for repair and upgrade. Following its return, it has been installed as the digitiser for the 30-m antenna. Since the installation of the new DBBC on the 12-m we have seen a significant improvement in our SEFD figures.
Previously they were of the order of 6000~Jy, now they are regularly $\sim 3800$~Jy, comparable with the AuScope 12-m antennas.
Having upgraded the Streamstor SDK for CONT14 and being able to address more than 1024 scans and greater than 16TB, we are in the process of upgrading our station diskpacks to 32TB.
\subsection{The 30-m antenna: Progress and issues}
By mid 2014 the conversion of the 30-m antenna had progressed to a stage where it was fully steerable and equipped with an uncooled 6~GHz receiver (donated by Jodrell Bank Observatory), and a First Light ceremony was held where a 6.7~GHz Methanol maser spectral line was received and displayed on a spectrum analyser Fig.~\ref{f:first_light_methanol}. More details of the conversion can be found in \cite{woodburn2014}.
With the return of the Observatory's original DBBC, installation of the Mk5B recorder and of a Symmetricom Universal Time and Frequency Distribution System to distribute signals from the observatory maser to the 30-m site, the antenna became capable of interferometry. The first VLBI fringe was detected on the baseline to the 26-m antenna at Hobart (Fig.~\ref{f:Ho_Wa_fringe}). We gratefully acknowledge the generous assistance of the University of Tasmania observatory in this accomplishment.
\begin{figure}[hbp]
\begin{minipage}[b]{0.45\linewidth}
\centering
{
\includegraphics[scale=0.6]{Maser_g188-1.eps}
}
\caption{First light Methanol Maser Spectral line at 6.7 GHz. Credit: Tim Natusch}
\label{f:first_light_methanol}
\end{minipage}
\mbox{\hspace{0.5cm}}
\begin{minipage}[b]{0.5\linewidth}
\centering
{
\includegraphics[scale=0.2]{Ho-Warkworth.eps}
}
\caption{The first VLBI fringe between Warkworth 30-m and Hobart 26m at C-Band 6.7 GHz. Credit: Leonid Petrov}
\label{f:Ho_Wa_fringe}
\end{minipage}
\end{figure}
\subsection{Warkworth Network}
In April 2014 the network link between Warkworth and the New Zealand research network (REANNZ) was upgraded to 10~Gbps. The international circuits from New Zealand provided by REANNZ are now 42~Gbps bi-directional to LA and 40~Gbps SXTransport ScienceWave (which REANNZ share with AARNet) that handles all the research and education routes. In October 2014 we installed 10~Gbps fibre network interface cards in our e-transfer Mk5. The bottle neck for us is now the receiving site, for example we can sustain 800~Mbps to the new data store in Perth run by iVEC, speeds to Bonn and USNO are of the order 100--200~Mbps.
\section{Current Status and Activities}
Year 2014 has seen a significant increase in the number of IVS sessions the 12-m has participated in, due in large part to the extra AUST sessions we are now able to participate in. A break down of session types (i.e. OHIG, CRDS, APSG, R and AUST) observed in 2014 are presented in Table \ref{t:ivs-wark}, showing our much higher utilisation/participation in IVS this year versus 2013.
\begin{table}[h]
\centering
\caption{The 12-m IVS 2014 Session Participation}
\begin{tabular}{l|cc}
\hline
\multirow{2}{*}{Experiment} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{Number of sessions} \\
& 2013 & 2014 \\
\hline
APSG & 2 & 2 \\
OHIG & 3 & 6 \\
R1 & 8 & 0 \\
R4 & 8 & 11 \\
CRDS & 6 & 6 \\
CONT & 0 & 14 \\
AUSTRAL & 6 & 57 \\
AUST & 15 & 15 \\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\label{t:ivs-wark}
\end{table}
The First geodetic observation with the Warkworth 30-m in C-Band with the Ceduna 30-m, Hobart 26 (University of Tasmania) was conducted in December 2014. The schedule and analysis was undertaken by Leonid Petrov (NASA Goddard Space Flight Center), providing a preliminary solution for the 30-m antenna presented in Table \ref{t:ivs-wark-30m} (Petrov et al, 2015, in prep).
\begin{table}[h]
\centering
\caption{The 30-m preliminary solution components, Credit : Leonid Petrov}
\begin{tabular}{cccc}
\hline
Epoch & X, mm& Y, mm& Z, mm\\
\hline
2000.01.01-12:00:00 & -5115425635.06 & 477880304.86 & -3767042837.73 \\
2014.12.11-12:59:43 & -5115425608.47 & 477880352.69 & -3767042708.48\\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\label{t:ivs-wark-30m}
\end{table}
\noindent This observation will be repeated in 2015, it is hoped with additional stations in Japan (Tsukuba and Kashima) and South Africa (Hartebeesthoek) able to participate.
Foundations have been laid for the future hosting of a Gravimeter when in transit here in New Zealand from Antarctica. The site is just outside the 12-m antenna control facility so as to easily access utilities, and is also close to one of the LINZ (Land Information New Zealand) GNSS station hosted at the Warkworth Observatory. In March 2015 a site survey of the observatory will be undertaken with the assistance of LINZ. This will provide a useful check o fthe initial local tie survey of the 12-m antenna and GNSS station conducted at the end of 2012 \cite{gentle_2013}, and also provide a tie to the 30-m radio telescope for the first time.
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.