The dataset could not be loaded because the splits use different data file formats, which is not supported. Read more about the splits configuration. Click for more details.
Error code: FileFormatMismatchBetweenSplitsError
Need help to make the dataset viewer work? Make sure to review how to configure the dataset viewer, and open a discussion for direct support.
CodeLeWM Run Artifacts
This dataset repository is the public artifact registry for CodeLeWM training, evaluation, demo, and publication runs. It is organized as manifest-backed run trees rather than as a conventional train/test dataset.
What Is Hosted Here
| Artifact family | Example path | Role |
|---|---|---|
| v0.2 and earlier code-edit runs | runs/codelewm-action-use-retrieval-20260520-7895d18/** |
negative action-use and retrieval evidence |
| v0.7/v0.8 execution runs | codelewm-v0-8-short-execution-20260605-1b737e4-seed-42/** |
execution-transition diagnostics |
| v0.9 execution runs | codelewm-v0-9-short-execution-20260606-69f798a-seed-{42,1729}/** |
final execution-training and reranking artifacts |
| Visual/demo bundles | visual-observability/** and related run paths |
UI and harness diagnostics |
Artifacts include manifests, configs, reports, checkpoint metadata, benchmark
outputs, and selected checkpoint files. The primary current dataset is
abdelstark/codelewm-execution-pack; historical code-edit shards are in
abdelstark/codelewm-public-shard.
Dataset And Model Context
- Current execution dataset:
abdelstark/codelewm-execution-pack@v0.9.0-rc1, 2,188 tokenized(code, input, output)records with deterministic sandbox provenance. - Historical code-edit dataset:
abdelstark/codelewm-public-shard, used by the scaled/action-use experiments. - Historical transition-model checkpoints:
abdelstark/codelewm-transition-model. - v0.9 execution checkpoints and run reports are stored directly in this repository under their run ids.
Claim Boundary
CodeLeWM is claim-gated. These artifacts support reproducibility, inspection, and diagnostic comparisons. They do not support a broad claim that CodeLeWM generally improves coding. The final public evidence supports negative action-use conclusions plus a narrow HumanEval WS-D reranking slice; the aggregate downstream claim remains closed.
Verification
Download a v0.9 run tree and verify it locally:
hf download abdelstark/codelewm-runs \
--repo-type dataset \
--include 'codelewm-v0-9-short-execution-20260606-69f798a-seed-42/**' \
--local-dir .artifacts/hf-download/codelewm-runs
uv run codelewm manifest verify \
--manifest .artifacts/hf-download/codelewm-runs/codelewm-v0-9-short-execution-20260606-69f798a-seed-42/manifest.json \
--parent-manifest .artifacts/v0_9/hf-pack-download/artifact_manifest.json \
--json
uv run codelewm secret-scan \
.artifacts/hf-download/codelewm-runs/codelewm-v0-9-short-execution-20260606-69f798a-seed-42 \
--json
Expected result: manifest verification returns ok=true and the secret scan
returns ok=true with zero findings. The parent-manifest path should point to
a local download of abdelstark/codelewm-execution-pack@v0.9.0-rc1.
Related Repositories
- Code repository:
https://github.com/AbdelStark/CodeLeWM - Current execution dataset:
https://huggingface.co/datasets/abdelstark/codelewm-execution-pack - Historical code-edit shard:
https://huggingface.co/datasets/abdelstark/codelewm-public-shard - Historical transition-model checkpoints:
https://huggingface.co/abdelstark/codelewm-transition-model
- Downloads last month
- 605