Datasets:
The dataset viewer is not available for this dataset.
Need help to make the dataset viewer work? Make sure to review how to configure the dataset viewer, and open a discussion for direct support.
HoloCount: A Holistic Visual Counting Benchmark for MLLMs
Abstract
Visual counting is a fundamental pillar of multimodal intelligence, requiring a seamless integration of fine-grained grounding and spatial reasoning. While Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have achieved remarkable success in qualitative scene understanding, their quantitative precision remains a significant bottleneck, often characterized by persistent numerical hallucinations. Existing counting benchmarks primarily focus on basic perception in simplified contexts, failing to capture the complex failure modes that emerge under logical constraints or adversarial conditions. To address these limitations, we introduce HoloCount, a holistic and diagnostically rich benchmark structured around a three-level hierarchical taxonomy. HoloCount evaluates MLLMs across: (1) Semantic Counting, focusing on atomic and property-based enumeration; (2) Analytical Counting, assessing logical composition through spatial and set-based reasoning; and (3) Robustness Testing, probing model integrity against adverse scenarios and grounded counter-priors, such as high-density scenes and linguistic biases. Through an exhaustive evaluation of over 20 state-of-the-art MLLMs, we reveal a critical performance gap: even top-tier models degrade significantly as tasks transition from perception to complex analytical reasoning and adverse scenarios. Our findings provide a systematic landscape of current MLLM counting capabilities and offer a roadmap for developing more grounded and reliable multimodal systems.
Overview
- 2,480 QA pairs
- 20 fine-grained subsets
- 1,481 visual concepts
- 30+ evaluated MLLMs
Taxonomy
The benchmark features a three-level hierarchical taxonomy:
- Semantic Counting — Atomic and property-based enumeration (6 subsets)
- Analytical Counting — Logical composition through spatial and set-based reasoning (7 subsets)
- Robustness Testing — Model integrity against adverse scenarios (7 subsets)
Dataset Composition
| Split | Count |
|---|---|
| Action & State Attribution | 102 |
| Aerial Perspective Shift | 109 |
| Atomic Counting | 182 |
| Categorical Cardinality | 101 |
| Chromatic Attribution | 202 |
| Complementary Exclusion | 101 |
| Coordinate-Prompt Region Grounding | 84 |
| Differential Comparison | 100 |
| General Semantic Attribution | 101 |
| High-Density Enumeration | 100 |
| Joint-Set Aggregation | 100 |
| Linguistic Prior Conflict | 163 |
| Material Attribution | 101 |
| Null-Target Prompting | 250 |
| Partial Object Occlusion | 103 |
| Relative Canonical Orientation | 78 |
| Scale Attribution | 100 |
| Small-Scale Enumeration | 101 |
| Visual Distractor Illusion | 200 |
| Visual-Prompt Region Grounding | 102 |
Usage
from datasets import load_dataset
dataset = load_dataset("MM-MVR/HoloCount")
Fields
image: the image filequestion: counting questionanswer: ground truth count (string)split: capability categorysample_id: unique identifierimage_height: original image height in pixelsimage_width: original image width in pixels
Citation
@article{deng2026holocount,
title={HoloCount: A Holistic Visual Counting Benchmark for MLLMs},
author={Deng, Jinhong and Qiao, Limeng and Wan, Guanglu},
year={2026}
}
License
This dataset is released under the CC BY 4.0 License.
Contact
- Jinhong Deng (dengjinhong@meituan.com)
- Downloads last month
- 1,741