id
stringlengths
16
16
task_family
stringclasses
20 values
task_type
stringclasses
20 values
domain
stringclasses
14 values
difficulty
stringclasses
5 values
difficulty_label
stringclasses
5 values
language
stringclasses
1 value
instruction
stringlengths
54
90
context
stringlengths
0
82
response
stringlengths
1
330
analysis_plan
stringclasses
10 values
verification
stringclasses
10 values
verification_type
stringclasses
7 values
prompt_review
stringclasses
2 values
prompt_alignment
stringclasses
3 values
constraint_check
stringclasses
3 values
consistency_check
stringclasses
2 values
math_check
stringclasses
3 values
logic_check
stringclasses
3 values
counterexample_check
stringclasses
2 values
data_analysis_check
stringclasses
3 values
code_check
stringclasses
3 values
evidence_check
stringclasses
3 values
source_check
stringclasses
3 values
hallucination_control
stringclasses
10 values
error_detection
stringclasses
10 values
error_repair
stringclasses
10 values
answerability
stringclasses
2 values
confidence
float32
0.85
1
uncertainty
float32
0
0.15
reasoning_depth
int16
1
4
minimal_sufficient_reasoning
bool
1 class
unnecessary_reasoning
bool
1 class
stop_condition
stringclasses
10 values
surface_variation
int32
0
16
numeric_variation
int32
0
96
structure_variation
int32
0
30
ood_style
int32
0
12
quality_score
float32
0.9
0.9
synthetic
bool
1 class
license
stringclasses
1 value
generator_version
stringclasses
1 value
mtd-000097998200
data_analysis
descriptive_statistics
statistics
easy
easy
en
Calculate the arithmetic mean of the supplied dataset.
Dataset: 38, 76, 98, 10, 85
Mean = 61.4000
Parse values, sum them, divide by count, verify.
Recompute sum and count.
exact
passed
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
Use only supplied dataset.
Check arithmetic and denominator.
Recompute statistic.
answerable
1
0
2
true
false
Stop after numerical verification.
0
70
8
1
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097998201
ambiguity
ambiguity_analysis
general_reasoning
easy
easy
en
Identify ambiguity in the request and state what information is missing.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97998201. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
1
71
9
2
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097998202
evidence_check
evidence_check_analysis
general_reasoning
easy
easy
en
Identify which claims require evidence before they can be asserted confidently.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97998202. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
2
72
10
3
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097998203
ambiguity
ambiguity_analysis
general_reasoning
easy
easy
en
Identify ambiguity in the request and state what information is missing.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97998203. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
3
73
11
4
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097998204
code
function_generation
programming
easy
easy
en
Write Python code that returns the square of an integer.
Input example: n = 27485
def square(n): return n * n
Identify required input/output and implement minimal function.
Static code contract check.
static_contract
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
No external API assumptions.
Check function signature and operation.
Correct implementation if contract is violated.
answerable
0.99
0.01
1
true
false
Stop after contract verification.
4
74
12
5
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097998205
constraint_reasoning
constraint_reasoning_analysis
general_reasoning
easy
easy
en
Solve a problem while respecting multiple explicit constraints.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97998205. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
5
75
13
6
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097998206
generalization
generalization_analysis
general_reasoning
easy
easy
en
Explain how to test whether a model generalizes beyond familiar examples.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97998206. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
6
76
14
7
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097998207
prompt_review
prompt_review_analysis
general_reasoning
easy
easy
en
Review the prompt for ambiguity, contradictions, and missing constraints.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97998207. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
7
77
15
8
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097998208
planning
planning_analysis
general_reasoning
easy
easy
en
Create a concise plan for solving a complex technical problem.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97998208. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
8
78
16
9
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097998209
reasoning
comparison
general_reasoning
easy
easy
en
Compare two quantities and explain the comparison using only the provided values.
A = 54, B = 22
A is greater than B by 32.
Compare values and compute difference.
Check comparison and difference.
exact
passed
passed
Use only supplied values.
Check comparison direction.
Recompute difference.
answerable
1
0
2
true
false
Stop after comparison verification.
9
79
17
10
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097998210
ambiguity
ambiguity_analysis
general_reasoning
medium
medium
en
Identify ambiguity in the request and state what information is missing.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97998210. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
10
80
18
11
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097998211
constraint_reasoning
constraint_reasoning_analysis
general_reasoning
medium
medium
en
Solve a problem while respecting multiple explicit constraints.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97998211. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
11
81
19
12
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097998212
data_analysis
descriptive_statistics
statistics
medium
medium
en
Calculate the arithmetic mean of the supplied dataset.
Dataset: 21, 45, 39, 84, 86
Mean = 55.0000
Parse values, sum them, divide by count, verify.
Recompute sum and count.
exact
passed
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
Use only supplied dataset.
Check arithmetic and denominator.
Recompute statistic.
answerable
1
0
2
true
false
Stop after numerical verification.
12
82
20
0
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097998213
instruction_following
format_constraint
general
medium
medium
en
Return the supplied number doubled. Return only the final number.
7860
15720
Identify transformation and output constraint.
Check transformation and requested format.
constraint
passed
passed
passed
No unsupported content.
answerable
1
0
1
true
false
Stop when requested format is satisfied.
13
83
21
1
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097998214
consistency_check
consistency_check_analysis
general_reasoning
medium
medium
en
Check whether the supplied statements are mutually consistent.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97998214. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
14
84
22
2
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097998215
counterexample
counterexample_analysis
general_reasoning
medium
medium
en
Construct a counterexample that tests whether a general claim always holds.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97998215. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
15
85
23
3
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097998216
ambiguity
ambiguity_analysis
general_reasoning
medium
medium
en
Identify ambiguity in the request and state what information is missing.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97998216. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
16
86
24
4
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097998217
ambiguity
ambiguity_analysis
general_reasoning
medium
medium
en
Identify ambiguity in the request and state what information is missing.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97998217. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
0
87
25
5
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097998218
evidence_check
evidence_check_analysis
general_reasoning
medium
medium
en
Identify which claims require evidence before they can be asserted confidently.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97998218. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
1
88
26
6
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097998219
research
research_methodology
climate science
medium
medium
en
Design a rigorous research procedure for investigating a question about climate science.
The procedure must distinguish evidence from assumptions and identify uncertainty.
1. Define the research question precisely. 2. Identify measurable variables and hypotheses. 3. Select appropriate primary and secondary sources. 4. Record provenance for each important claim. 5. Compare independent evidence. 6. Identify uncertainty and alternative explanations. 7. Report conclusions separately from obs...
Define question, gather evidence, evaluate sources, quantify uncertainty.
Methodological consistency check.
methodological
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
required
required
Do not invent sources or findings.
Detect unsupported claims.
Remove or qualify unsupported claims.
answerable
0.92
0.08
4
true
false
Stop when methodology is complete and internally coherent.
2
89
27
7
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097998220
consistency_check
consistency_check_analysis
general_reasoning
medium
medium
en
Check whether the supplied statements are mutually consistent.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97998220. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
3
90
28
8
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097998221
code
function_generation
programming
medium
medium
en
Write Python code that returns the square of an integer.
Input example: n = 47666
def square(n): return n * n
Identify required input/output and implement minimal function.
Static code contract check.
static_contract
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
No external API assumptions.
Check function signature and operation.
Correct implementation if contract is violated.
answerable
0.99
0.01
1
true
false
Stop after contract verification.
4
91
29
9
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097998222
research
research_methodology
biology
medium
medium
en
Design a rigorous research procedure for investigating a question about biology.
The procedure must distinguish evidence from assumptions and identify uncertainty.
1. Define the research question precisely. 2. Identify measurable variables and hypotheses. 3. Select appropriate primary and secondary sources. 4. Record provenance for each important claim. 5. Compare independent evidence. 6. Identify uncertainty and alternative explanations. 7. Report conclusions separately from obs...
Define question, gather evidence, evaluate sources, quantify uncertainty.
Methodological consistency check.
methodological
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
required
required
Do not invent sources or findings.
Detect unsupported claims.
Remove or qualify unsupported claims.
answerable
0.92
0.08
4
true
false
Stop when methodology is complete and internally coherent.
5
92
30
10
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097998223
error_analysis
error_analysis_analysis
general_reasoning
medium
medium
en
Classify the likely cause of an incorrect answer and propose a repair.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97998223. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
6
93
0
11
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097998224
self_correction
error_repair
mathematics
medium
medium
en
Identify and correct the numerical error in the proposed answer.
Problem: 60 + 65 Proposed answer: 127
The proposed answer is incorrect. The correct answer is 125.
Recompute independently, compare with proposal, repair mismatch.
Independent recomputation.
exact
passed
Do not trust the proposed answer without verification.
passed
passed
answerable
1
0
3
true
false
Stop after independent correction.
7
94
1
12
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097998225
consistency_check
consistency_check_analysis
general_reasoning
medium
medium
en
Check whether the supplied statements are mutually consistent.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97998225. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
8
95
2
0
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097998226
math
arithmetic
mathematics
medium
medium
en
Solve the following arithmetic problem exactly: 612231 - 273723
338508
Identify operation, compute exactly, verify result.
Exact arithmetic verification.
exact
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
Use only supplied operands.
Check arithmetic operation.
Recompute if mismatch detected.
answerable
1
0
1
true
false
Stop after exact verification.
9
96
3
1
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097998227
evidence_check
evidence_check_analysis
general_reasoning
medium
medium
en
Identify which claims require evidence before they can be asserted confidently.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97998227. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
10
0
4
2
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097998228
consistency_check
consistency_check_analysis
general_reasoning
medium
medium
en
Check whether the supplied statements are mutually consistent.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97998228. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
11
1
5
3
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097998229
logic
deductive_reasoning
logic
medium
medium
en
Determine whether the conclusion follows from the given statements.
If x > 84, then x is positive. x = 84. y = 86.
Conclusion: x is positive. Result: Yes.
Identify premises, apply implication, verify conclusion.
Logical consistency check.
symbolic
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
Reason only from supplied premises.
Check whether conclusion is entailed.
Re-evaluate premises if conclusion conflicts.
answerable
0.99
0.01
2
true
false
Stop once entailment is established.
12
2
6
4
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097998230
data_analysis
descriptive_statistics
statistics
medium
medium
en
Calculate the arithmetic mean of the supplied dataset.
Dataset: 11, 99, 64, 2, 75
Mean = 50.2000
Parse values, sum them, divide by count, verify.
Recompute sum and count.
exact
passed
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
Use only supplied dataset.
Check arithmetic and denominator.
Recompute statistic.
answerable
1
0
2
true
false
Stop after numerical verification.
13
3
7
5
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097998231
prompt_review
prompt_review_analysis
general_reasoning
medium
medium
en
Review the prompt for ambiguity, contradictions, and missing constraints.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97998231. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
14
4
8
6
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097998232
consistency_check
consistency_check_analysis
general_reasoning
medium
medium
en
Check whether the supplied statements are mutually consistent.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97998232. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
15
5
9
7
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097998233
ambiguity
ambiguity_analysis
general_reasoning
medium
medium
en
Identify ambiguity in the request and state what information is missing.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97998233. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
16
6
10
8
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097998234
fact_check
claim_verification
general_knowledge
medium
medium
en
Assess the claim and state whether it is correct. Do not invent evidence.
All metals are liquid at room temperature.
Assessment: Incorrect. A reliable fact-check should verify the claim against an appropriate authoritative source.
Parse claim, identify factual assertion, verify against reliable evidence.
External evidence should be checked for real-world factual claims.
evidence
required
required
Never fabricate a citation.
Identify unsupported factual certainty.
Qualify or verify the claim.
answerable
0.85
0.15
3
true
false
Stop after evidence requirement is identified.
0
7
11
9
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097998235
consistency_check
consistency_check_analysis
general_reasoning
medium
medium
en
Check whether the supplied statements are mutually consistent.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97998235. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
1
8
12
10
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097998236
code
function_generation
programming
medium
medium
en
Write Python code that returns the square of an integer.
Input example: n = 19729
def square(n): return n * n
Identify required input/output and implement minimal function.
Static code contract check.
static_contract
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
No external API assumptions.
Check function signature and operation.
Correct implementation if contract is violated.
answerable
0.99
0.01
1
true
false
Stop after contract verification.
2
9
13
11
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097998237
fact_check
claim_verification
general_knowledge
medium
medium
en
Assess the claim and state whether it is correct. Do not invent evidence.
A triangle has four sides.
Assessment: Incorrect. A reliable fact-check should verify the claim against an appropriate authoritative source.
Parse claim, identify factual assertion, verify against reliable evidence.
External evidence should be checked for real-world factual claims.
evidence
required
required
Never fabricate a citation.
Identify unsupported factual certainty.
Qualify or verify the claim.
answerable
0.85
0.15
3
true
false
Stop after evidence requirement is identified.
3
10
14
12
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097998238
error_analysis
error_analysis_analysis
general_reasoning
medium
medium
en
Classify the likely cause of an incorrect answer and propose a repair.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97998238. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
4
11
15
0
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097998239
counterexample
counterexample_analysis
general_reasoning
medium
medium
en
Construct a counterexample that tests whether a general claim always holds.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97998239. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
5
12
16
1
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097998240
math
arithmetic
mathematics
hard
hard
en
Solve the following arithmetic problem exactly: 138 × 391
53958
Identify operation, compute exactly, verify result.
Exact arithmetic verification.
exact
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
Use only supplied operands.
Check arithmetic operation.
Recompute if mismatch detected.
answerable
1
0
1
true
false
Stop after exact verification.
6
13
17
2
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097998241
math
arithmetic
mathematics
hard
hard
en
Solve the following arithmetic problem exactly: 269242 ÷ 206
269242
Identify operation, compute exactly, verify result.
Exact arithmetic verification.
exact
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
Use only supplied operands.
Check arithmetic operation.
Recompute if mismatch detected.
answerable
1
0
1
true
false
Stop after exact verification.
7
14
18
3
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097998242
planning
planning_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Create a concise plan for solving a complex technical problem.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97998242. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
8
15
19
4
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097998243
error_analysis
error_analysis_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Classify the likely cause of an incorrect answer and propose a repair.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97998243. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
9
16
20
5
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097998244
fact_check
claim_verification
general_knowledge
hard
hard
en
Assess the claim and state whether it is correct. Do not invent evidence.
A triangle has four sides.
Assessment: Incorrect. A reliable fact-check should verify the claim against an appropriate authoritative source.
Parse claim, identify factual assertion, verify against reliable evidence.
External evidence should be checked for real-world factual claims.
evidence
required
required
Never fabricate a citation.
Identify unsupported factual certainty.
Qualify or verify the claim.
answerable
0.85
0.15
3
true
false
Stop after evidence requirement is identified.
10
17
21
6
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097998245
self_correction
error_repair
mathematics
hard
hard
en
Identify and correct the numerical error in the proposed answer.
Problem: 84 + 91 Proposed answer: 184
The proposed answer is incorrect. The correct answer is 175.
Recompute independently, compare with proposal, repair mismatch.
Independent recomputation.
exact
passed
Do not trust the proposed answer without verification.
passed
passed
answerable
1
0
3
true
false
Stop after independent correction.
11
18
22
7
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097998246
prompt_review
prompt_review_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Review the prompt for ambiguity, contradictions, and missing constraints.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97998246. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
12
19
23
8
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097998247
prompt_review
prompt_review_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Review the prompt for ambiguity, contradictions, and missing constraints.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97998247. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
13
20
24
9
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097998248
fact_check
claim_verification
general_knowledge
hard
hard
en
Assess the claim and state whether it is correct. Do not invent evidence.
All metals are liquid at room temperature.
Assessment: Incorrect. A reliable fact-check should verify the claim against an appropriate authoritative source.
Parse claim, identify factual assertion, verify against reliable evidence.
External evidence should be checked for real-world factual claims.
evidence
required
required
Never fabricate a citation.
Identify unsupported factual certainty.
Qualify or verify the claim.
answerable
0.85
0.15
3
true
false
Stop after evidence requirement is identified.
14
21
25
10
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097998249
self_correction
error_repair
mathematics
hard
hard
en
Identify and correct the numerical error in the proposed answer.
Problem: 89 + 34 Proposed answer: 131
The proposed answer is incorrect. The correct answer is 123.
Recompute independently, compare with proposal, repair mismatch.
Independent recomputation.
exact
passed
Do not trust the proposed answer without verification.
passed
passed
answerable
1
0
3
true
false
Stop after independent correction.
15
22
26
11
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097998250
error_analysis
error_analysis_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Classify the likely cause of an incorrect answer and propose a repair.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97998250. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
16
23
27
12
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097998251
consistency_check
consistency_check_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Check whether the supplied statements are mutually consistent.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97998251. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
0
24
28
0
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097998252
counterexample
counterexample_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Construct a counterexample that tests whether a general claim always holds.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97998252. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
1
25
29
1
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097998253
consistency_check
consistency_check_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Check whether the supplied statements are mutually consistent.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97998253. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
2
26
30
2
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097998254
calibration
calibration_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Explain when a system should reduce confidence in its answer.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97998254. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
3
27
0
3
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097998255
ambiguity
ambiguity_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Identify ambiguity in the request and state what information is missing.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97998255. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
4
28
1
4
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097998256
planning
planning_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Create a concise plan for solving a complex technical problem.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97998256. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
5
29
2
5
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097998257
reasoning
comparison
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Compare two quantities and explain the comparison using only the provided values.
A = 53, B = 8
A is greater than B by 45.
Compare values and compute difference.
Check comparison and difference.
exact
passed
passed
Use only supplied values.
Check comparison direction.
Recompute difference.
answerable
1
0
2
true
false
Stop after comparison verification.
6
30
3
6
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097998258
evidence_check
evidence_check_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Identify which claims require evidence before they can be asserted confidently.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97998258. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
7
31
4
7
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097998259
data_analysis
descriptive_statistics
statistics
hard
hard
en
Calculate the arithmetic mean of the supplied dataset.
Dataset: 38, 42, 29, 7, 9
Mean = 25.0000
Parse values, sum them, divide by count, verify.
Recompute sum and count.
exact
passed
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
Use only supplied dataset.
Check arithmetic and denominator.
Recompute statistic.
answerable
1
0
2
true
false
Stop after numerical verification.
8
32
5
8
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097998260
ambiguity
ambiguity_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Identify ambiguity in the request and state what information is missing.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97998260. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
9
33
6
9
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097998261
code
function_generation
programming
hard
hard
en
Write Python code that returns the square of an integer.
Input example: n = 7175
def square(n): return n * n
Identify required input/output and implement minimal function.
Static code contract check.
static_contract
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
No external API assumptions.
Check function signature and operation.
Correct implementation if contract is violated.
answerable
0.99
0.01
1
true
false
Stop after contract verification.
10
34
7
10
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097998262
self_correction
error_repair
mathematics
hard
hard
en
Identify and correct the numerical error in the proposed answer.
Problem: 59 + 99 Proposed answer: 162
The proposed answer is incorrect. The correct answer is 158.
Recompute independently, compare with proposal, repair mismatch.
Independent recomputation.
exact
passed
Do not trust the proposed answer without verification.
passed
passed
answerable
1
0
3
true
false
Stop after independent correction.
11
35
8
11
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097998263
prompt_review
prompt_review_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Review the prompt for ambiguity, contradictions, and missing constraints.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97998263. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
12
36
9
12
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097998264
evidence_check
evidence_check_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Identify which claims require evidence before they can be asserted confidently.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97998264. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
13
37
10
0
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097998265
prompt_review
prompt_review_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Review the prompt for ambiguity, contradictions, and missing constraints.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97998265. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
14
38
11
1
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097998266
reasoning
comparison
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Compare two quantities and explain the comparison using only the provided values.
A = 43, B = 41
A is greater than B by 2.
Compare values and compute difference.
Check comparison and difference.
exact
passed
passed
Use only supplied values.
Check comparison direction.
Recompute difference.
answerable
1
0
2
true
false
Stop after comparison verification.
15
39
12
2
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097998267
reasoning
comparison
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Compare two quantities and explain the comparison using only the provided values.
A = 21, B = 4
A is greater than B by 17.
Compare values and compute difference.
Check comparison and difference.
exact
passed
passed
Use only supplied values.
Check comparison direction.
Recompute difference.
answerable
1
0
2
true
false
Stop after comparison verification.
16
40
13
3
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097998268
self_correction
error_repair
mathematics
hard
hard
en
Identify and correct the numerical error in the proposed answer.
Problem: 94 + 97 Proposed answer: 198
The proposed answer is incorrect. The correct answer is 191.
Recompute independently, compare with proposal, repair mismatch.
Independent recomputation.
exact
passed
Do not trust the proposed answer without verification.
passed
passed
answerable
1
0
3
true
false
Stop after independent correction.
0
41
14
4
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097998269
logic
deductive_reasoning
logic
hard
hard
en
Determine whether the conclusion follows from the given statements.
If x > 52, then x is positive. x = 52. y = 56.
Conclusion: x is positive. Result: Yes.
Identify premises, apply implication, verify conclusion.
Logical consistency check.
symbolic
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
Reason only from supplied premises.
Check whether conclusion is entailed.
Re-evaluate premises if conclusion conflicts.
answerable
0.99
0.01
2
true
false
Stop once entailment is established.
1
42
15
5
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097998270
math
arithmetic
mathematics
hard
hard
en
Solve the following arithmetic problem exactly: 400250 + 793607
1193857
Identify operation, compute exactly, verify result.
Exact arithmetic verification.
exact
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
Use only supplied operands.
Check arithmetic operation.
Recompute if mismatch detected.
answerable
1
0
1
true
false
Stop after exact verification.
2
43
16
6
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097998271
calibration
calibration_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Explain when a system should reduce confidence in its answer.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97998271. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
3
44
17
7
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097998272
instruction_following
format_constraint
general
hard
hard
en
Return the supplied number doubled. Return only the final number.
2540
5080
Identify transformation and output constraint.
Check transformation and requested format.
constraint
passed
passed
passed
No unsupported content.
answerable
1
0
1
true
false
Stop when requested format is satisfied.
4
45
18
8
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097998273
constraint_reasoning
constraint_reasoning_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Solve a problem while respecting multiple explicit constraints.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97998273. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
5
46
19
9
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097998274
data_analysis
descriptive_statistics
statistics
hard
hard
en
Calculate the arithmetic mean of the supplied dataset.
Dataset: 42, 58, 92, 17, 62
Mean = 54.2000
Parse values, sum them, divide by count, verify.
Recompute sum and count.
exact
passed
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
Use only supplied dataset.
Check arithmetic and denominator.
Recompute statistic.
answerable
1
0
2
true
false
Stop after numerical verification.
6
47
20
10
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097998275
planning
planning_analysis
general_reasoning
very_hard
very_hard
en
Create a concise plan for solving a complex technical problem.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97998275. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
7
48
21
11
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097998276
generalization
generalization_analysis
general_reasoning
very_hard
very_hard
en
Explain how to test whether a model generalizes beyond familiar examples.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97998276. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
8
49
22
12
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097998277
instruction_following
format_constraint
general
very_hard
very_hard
en
Return the supplied number doubled. Return only the final number.
7409
14818
Identify transformation and output constraint.
Check transformation and requested format.
constraint
passed
passed
passed
No unsupported content.
answerable
1
0
1
true
false
Stop when requested format is satisfied.
9
50
23
0
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097998278
self_correction
error_repair
mathematics
very_hard
very_hard
en
Identify and correct the numerical error in the proposed answer.
Problem: 15 + 28 Proposed answer: 46
The proposed answer is incorrect. The correct answer is 43.
Recompute independently, compare with proposal, repair mismatch.
Independent recomputation.
exact
passed
Do not trust the proposed answer without verification.
passed
passed
answerable
1
0
3
true
false
Stop after independent correction.
10
51
24
1
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097998279
calibration
calibration_analysis
general_reasoning
very_hard
very_hard
en
Explain when a system should reduce confidence in its answer.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97998279. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
11
52
25
2
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097998280
logic
deductive_reasoning
logic
very_hard
very_hard
en
Determine whether the conclusion follows from the given statements.
If x > 31, then x is positive. x = 31. y = 67.
Conclusion: x is positive. Result: Yes.
Identify premises, apply implication, verify conclusion.
Logical consistency check.
symbolic
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
Reason only from supplied premises.
Check whether conclusion is entailed.
Re-evaluate premises if conclusion conflicts.
answerable
0.99
0.01
2
true
false
Stop once entailment is established.
12
53
26
3
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097998281
logic
deductive_reasoning
logic
very_hard
very_hard
en
Determine whether the conclusion follows from the given statements.
If x > 12, then x is positive. x = 12. y = 3.
Conclusion: x is positive. Result: Yes.
Identify premises, apply implication, verify conclusion.
Logical consistency check.
symbolic
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
Reason only from supplied premises.
Check whether conclusion is entailed.
Re-evaluate premises if conclusion conflicts.
answerable
0.99
0.01
2
true
false
Stop once entailment is established.
13
54
27
4
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097998282
code
function_generation
programming
very_hard
very_hard
en
Write Python code that returns the square of an integer.
Input example: n = 4873
def square(n): return n * n
Identify required input/output and implement minimal function.
Static code contract check.
static_contract
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
No external API assumptions.
Check function signature and operation.
Correct implementation if contract is violated.
answerable
0.99
0.01
1
true
false
Stop after contract verification.
14
55
28
5
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097998283
constraint_reasoning
constraint_reasoning_analysis
general_reasoning
very_hard
very_hard
en
Solve a problem while respecting multiple explicit constraints.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97998283. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
15
56
29
6
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097998284
error_analysis
error_analysis_analysis
general_reasoning
very_hard
very_hard
en
Classify the likely cause of an incorrect answer and propose a repair.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97998284. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
16
57
30
7
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097998285
prompt_review
prompt_review_analysis
general_reasoning
very_hard
very_hard
en
Review the prompt for ambiguity, contradictions, and missing constraints.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97998285. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
0
58
0
8
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097998286
prompt_review
prompt_review_analysis
general_reasoning
very_hard
very_hard
en
Review the prompt for ambiguity, contradictions, and missing constraints.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97998286. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
1
59
1
9
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097998287
constraint_reasoning
constraint_reasoning_analysis
general_reasoning
very_hard
very_hard
en
Solve a problem while respecting multiple explicit constraints.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97998287. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
2
60
2
10
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097998288
constraint_reasoning
constraint_reasoning_analysis
general_reasoning
very_hard
very_hard
en
Solve a problem while respecting multiple explicit constraints.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97998288. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
3
61
3
11
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097998289
planning
planning_analysis
general_reasoning
very_hard
very_hard
en
Create a concise plan for solving a complex technical problem.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97998289. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
4
62
4
12
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097998290
logic
deductive_reasoning
logic
very_hard
very_hard
en
Determine whether the conclusion follows from the given statements.
If x > 76, then x is positive. x = 76. y = 67.
Conclusion: x is positive. Result: Yes.
Identify premises, apply implication, verify conclusion.
Logical consistency check.
symbolic
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
Reason only from supplied premises.
Check whether conclusion is entailed.
Re-evaluate premises if conclusion conflicts.
answerable
0.99
0.01
2
true
false
Stop once entailment is established.
5
63
5
0
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097998291
fact_check
claim_verification
general_knowledge
very_hard
very_hard
en
Assess the claim and state whether it is correct. Do not invent evidence.
A triangle has four sides.
Assessment: Incorrect. A reliable fact-check should verify the claim against an appropriate authoritative source.
Parse claim, identify factual assertion, verify against reliable evidence.
External evidence should be checked for real-world factual claims.
evidence
required
required
Never fabricate a citation.
Identify unsupported factual certainty.
Qualify or verify the claim.
answerable
0.85
0.15
3
true
false
Stop after evidence requirement is identified.
6
64
6
1
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097998292
self_correction
error_repair
mathematics
very_hard
very_hard
en
Identify and correct the numerical error in the proposed answer.
Problem: 28 + 89 Proposed answer: 120
The proposed answer is incorrect. The correct answer is 117.
Recompute independently, compare with proposal, repair mismatch.
Independent recomputation.
exact
passed
Do not trust the proposed answer without verification.
passed
passed
answerable
1
0
3
true
false
Stop after independent correction.
7
65
7
2
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097998293
generalization
generalization_analysis
general_reasoning
very_hard
very_hard
en
Explain how to test whether a model generalizes beyond familiar examples.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97998293. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
8
66
8
3
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097998294
counterexample
counterexample_analysis
general_reasoning
very_hard
very_hard
en
Construct a counterexample that tests whether a general claim always holds.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97998294. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
9
67
9
4
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097998295
counterexample
counterexample_analysis
general_reasoning
extreme
extreme
en
Construct a counterexample that tests whether a general claim always holds.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97998295. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
10
68
10
5
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097998296
counterexample
counterexample_analysis
general_reasoning
extreme
extreme
en
Construct a counterexample that tests whether a general claim always holds.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97998296. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
11
69
11
6
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097998297
self_correction
error_repair
mathematics
extreme
extreme
en
Identify and correct the numerical error in the proposed answer.
Problem: 51 + 58 Proposed answer: 111
The proposed answer is incorrect. The correct answer is 109.
Recompute independently, compare with proposal, repair mismatch.
Independent recomputation.
exact
passed
Do not trust the proposed answer without verification.
passed
passed
answerable
1
0
3
true
false
Stop after independent correction.
12
70
12
7
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097998298
logic
deductive_reasoning
logic
extreme
extreme
en
Determine whether the conclusion follows from the given statements.
If x > 37, then x is positive. x = 37. y = 44.
Conclusion: x is positive. Result: Yes.
Identify premises, apply implication, verify conclusion.
Logical consistency check.
symbolic
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
Reason only from supplied premises.
Check whether conclusion is entailed.
Re-evaluate premises if conclusion conflicts.
answerable
0.99
0.01
2
true
false
Stop once entailment is established.
13
71
13
8
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097998299
evidence_check
evidence_check_analysis
general_reasoning
extreme
extreme
en
Identify which claims require evidence before they can be asserted confidently.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97998299. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
14
72
14
9
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1