id
stringlengths
16
16
task_family
stringclasses
20 values
task_type
stringclasses
20 values
domain
stringclasses
14 values
difficulty
stringclasses
5 values
difficulty_label
stringclasses
5 values
language
stringclasses
1 value
instruction
stringlengths
54
90
context
stringlengths
0
82
response
stringlengths
1
330
analysis_plan
stringclasses
10 values
verification
stringclasses
10 values
verification_type
stringclasses
7 values
prompt_review
stringclasses
2 values
prompt_alignment
stringclasses
3 values
constraint_check
stringclasses
3 values
consistency_check
stringclasses
2 values
math_check
stringclasses
3 values
logic_check
stringclasses
3 values
counterexample_check
stringclasses
2 values
data_analysis_check
stringclasses
3 values
code_check
stringclasses
3 values
evidence_check
stringclasses
3 values
source_check
stringclasses
3 values
hallucination_control
stringclasses
10 values
error_detection
stringclasses
10 values
error_repair
stringclasses
10 values
answerability
stringclasses
2 values
confidence
float32
0.85
1
uncertainty
float32
0
0.15
reasoning_depth
int16
1
4
minimal_sufficient_reasoning
bool
1 class
unnecessary_reasoning
bool
1 class
stop_condition
stringclasses
10 values
surface_variation
int32
0
16
numeric_variation
int32
0
96
structure_variation
int32
0
30
ood_style
int32
0
12
quality_score
float32
0.9
0.9
synthetic
bool
1 class
license
stringclasses
1 value
generator_version
stringclasses
1 value
mtd-000097997800
generalization
generalization_analysis
general_reasoning
easy
easy
en
Explain how to test whether a model generalizes beyond familiar examples.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97997800. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
8
58
11
4
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097997801
adversarial
adversarial_analysis
general_reasoning
easy
easy
en
Identify a plausible failure mode in the proposed reasoning.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97997801. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
9
59
12
5
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097997802
research
research_methodology
machine learning
easy
easy
en
Design a rigorous research procedure for investigating a question about machine learning.
The procedure must distinguish evidence from assumptions and identify uncertainty.
1. Define the research question precisely. 2. Identify measurable variables and hypotheses. 3. Select appropriate primary and secondary sources. 4. Record provenance for each important claim. 5. Compare independent evidence. 6. Identify uncertainty and alternative explanations. 7. Report conclusions separately from obs...
Define question, gather evidence, evaluate sources, quantify uncertainty.
Methodological consistency check.
methodological
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
required
required
Do not invent sources or findings.
Detect unsupported claims.
Remove or qualify unsupported claims.
answerable
0.92
0.08
4
true
false
Stop when methodology is complete and internally coherent.
10
60
13
6
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097997803
error_analysis
error_analysis_analysis
general_reasoning
easy
easy
en
Classify the likely cause of an incorrect answer and propose a repair.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97997803. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
11
61
14
7
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097997804
fact_check
claim_verification
general_knowledge
easy
easy
en
Assess the claim and state whether it is correct. Do not invent evidence.
A triangle has four sides.
Assessment: Incorrect. A reliable fact-check should verify the claim against an appropriate authoritative source.
Parse claim, identify factual assertion, verify against reliable evidence.
External evidence should be checked for real-world factual claims.
evidence
required
required
Never fabricate a citation.
Identify unsupported factual certainty.
Qualify or verify the claim.
answerable
0.85
0.15
3
true
false
Stop after evidence requirement is identified.
12
62
15
8
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097997805
consistency_check
consistency_check_analysis
general_reasoning
easy
easy
en
Check whether the supplied statements are mutually consistent.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97997805. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
13
63
16
9
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097997806
reasoning
comparison
general_reasoning
easy
easy
en
Compare two quantities and explain the comparison using only the provided values.
A = 77, B = 45
A is greater than B by 32.
Compare values and compute difference.
Check comparison and difference.
exact
passed
passed
Use only supplied values.
Check comparison direction.
Recompute difference.
answerable
1
0
2
true
false
Stop after comparison verification.
14
64
17
10
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097997807
generalization
generalization_analysis
general_reasoning
easy
easy
en
Explain how to test whether a model generalizes beyond familiar examples.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97997807. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
15
65
18
11
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097997808
error_analysis
error_analysis_analysis
general_reasoning
easy
easy
en
Classify the likely cause of an incorrect answer and propose a repair.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97997808. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
16
66
19
12
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097997809
code
function_generation
programming
easy
easy
en
Write Python code that returns the square of an integer.
Input example: n = 48554
def square(n): return n * n
Identify required input/output and implement minimal function.
Static code contract check.
static_contract
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
No external API assumptions.
Check function signature and operation.
Correct implementation if contract is violated.
answerable
0.99
0.01
1
true
false
Stop after contract verification.
0
67
20
0
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097997810
research
research_methodology
astronomy
medium
medium
en
Design a rigorous research procedure for investigating a question about astronomy.
The procedure must distinguish evidence from assumptions and identify uncertainty.
1. Define the research question precisely. 2. Identify measurable variables and hypotheses. 3. Select appropriate primary and secondary sources. 4. Record provenance for each important claim. 5. Compare independent evidence. 6. Identify uncertainty and alternative explanations. 7. Report conclusions separately from obs...
Define question, gather evidence, evaluate sources, quantify uncertainty.
Methodological consistency check.
methodological
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
required
required
Do not invent sources or findings.
Detect unsupported claims.
Remove or qualify unsupported claims.
answerable
0.92
0.08
4
true
false
Stop when methodology is complete and internally coherent.
1
68
21
1
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097997811
adversarial
adversarial_analysis
general_reasoning
medium
medium
en
Identify a plausible failure mode in the proposed reasoning.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97997811. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
2
69
22
2
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097997812
prompt_review
prompt_review_analysis
general_reasoning
medium
medium
en
Review the prompt for ambiguity, contradictions, and missing constraints.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97997812. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
3
70
23
3
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097997813
math
arithmetic
mathematics
medium
medium
en
Solve the following arithmetic problem exactly: 837596 ÷ 412
837596
Identify operation, compute exactly, verify result.
Exact arithmetic verification.
exact
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
Use only supplied operands.
Check arithmetic operation.
Recompute if mismatch detected.
answerable
1
0
1
true
false
Stop after exact verification.
4
71
24
4
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097997814
constraint_reasoning
constraint_reasoning_analysis
general_reasoning
medium
medium
en
Solve a problem while respecting multiple explicit constraints.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97997814. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
5
72
25
5
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097997815
ambiguity
ambiguity_analysis
general_reasoning
medium
medium
en
Identify ambiguity in the request and state what information is missing.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97997815. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
6
73
26
6
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097997816
error_analysis
error_analysis_analysis
general_reasoning
medium
medium
en
Classify the likely cause of an incorrect answer and propose a repair.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97997816. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
7
74
27
7
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097997817
generalization
generalization_analysis
general_reasoning
medium
medium
en
Explain how to test whether a model generalizes beyond familiar examples.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97997817. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
8
75
28
8
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097997818
generalization
generalization_analysis
general_reasoning
medium
medium
en
Explain how to test whether a model generalizes beyond familiar examples.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97997818. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
9
76
29
9
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097997819
math
arithmetic
mathematics
medium
medium
en
Solve the following arithmetic problem exactly: 90157 - 10623
79534
Identify operation, compute exactly, verify result.
Exact arithmetic verification.
exact
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
Use only supplied operands.
Check arithmetic operation.
Recompute if mismatch detected.
answerable
1
0
1
true
false
Stop after exact verification.
10
77
30
10
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097997820
adversarial
adversarial_analysis
general_reasoning
medium
medium
en
Identify a plausible failure mode in the proposed reasoning.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97997820. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
11
78
0
11
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097997821
error_analysis
error_analysis_analysis
general_reasoning
medium
medium
en
Classify the likely cause of an incorrect answer and propose a repair.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97997821. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
12
79
1
12
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097997822
prompt_review
prompt_review_analysis
general_reasoning
medium
medium
en
Review the prompt for ambiguity, contradictions, and missing constraints.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97997822. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
13
80
2
0
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097997823
generalization
generalization_analysis
general_reasoning
medium
medium
en
Explain how to test whether a model generalizes beyond familiar examples.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97997823. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
14
81
3
1
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097997824
counterexample
counterexample_analysis
general_reasoning
medium
medium
en
Construct a counterexample that tests whether a general claim always holds.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97997824. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
15
82
4
2
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097997825
reasoning
comparison
general_reasoning
medium
medium
en
Compare two quantities and explain the comparison using only the provided values.
A = 65, B = 25
A is greater than B by 40.
Compare values and compute difference.
Check comparison and difference.
exact
passed
passed
Use only supplied values.
Check comparison direction.
Recompute difference.
answerable
1
0
2
true
false
Stop after comparison verification.
16
83
5
3
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097997826
prompt_review
prompt_review_analysis
general_reasoning
medium
medium
en
Review the prompt for ambiguity, contradictions, and missing constraints.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97997826. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
0
84
6
4
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097997827
instruction_following
format_constraint
general
medium
medium
en
Return the supplied number doubled. Return only the final number.
6526
13052
Identify transformation and output constraint.
Check transformation and requested format.
constraint
passed
passed
passed
No unsupported content.
answerable
1
0
1
true
false
Stop when requested format is satisfied.
1
85
7
5
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097997828
data_analysis
descriptive_statistics
statistics
medium
medium
en
Calculate the arithmetic mean of the supplied dataset.
Dataset: 96, 63, 65, 89, 2
Mean = 63.0000
Parse values, sum them, divide by count, verify.
Recompute sum and count.
exact
passed
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
Use only supplied dataset.
Check arithmetic and denominator.
Recompute statistic.
answerable
1
0
2
true
false
Stop after numerical verification.
2
86
8
6
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097997829
data_analysis
descriptive_statistics
statistics
medium
medium
en
Calculate the arithmetic mean of the supplied dataset.
Dataset: 10, 20, 8, 63, 39
Mean = 28.0000
Parse values, sum them, divide by count, verify.
Recompute sum and count.
exact
passed
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
Use only supplied dataset.
Check arithmetic and denominator.
Recompute statistic.
answerable
1
0
2
true
false
Stop after numerical verification.
3
87
9
7
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097997830
consistency_check
consistency_check_analysis
general_reasoning
medium
medium
en
Check whether the supplied statements are mutually consistent.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97997830. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
4
88
10
8
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097997831
generalization
generalization_analysis
general_reasoning
medium
medium
en
Explain how to test whether a model generalizes beyond familiar examples.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97997831. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
5
89
11
9
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097997832
math
arithmetic
mathematics
medium
medium
en
Solve the following arithmetic problem exactly: 7035 × 107
752745
Identify operation, compute exactly, verify result.
Exact arithmetic verification.
exact
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
Use only supplied operands.
Check arithmetic operation.
Recompute if mismatch detected.
answerable
1
0
1
true
false
Stop after exact verification.
6
90
12
10
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097997833
self_correction
error_repair
mathematics
medium
medium
en
Identify and correct the numerical error in the proposed answer.
Problem: 22 + 92 Proposed answer: 119
The proposed answer is incorrect. The correct answer is 114.
Recompute independently, compare with proposal, repair mismatch.
Independent recomputation.
exact
passed
Do not trust the proposed answer without verification.
passed
passed
answerable
1
0
3
true
false
Stop after independent correction.
7
91
13
11
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097997834
fact_check
claim_verification
general_knowledge
medium
medium
en
Assess the claim and state whether it is correct. Do not invent evidence.
A triangle has four sides.
Assessment: Incorrect. A reliable fact-check should verify the claim against an appropriate authoritative source.
Parse claim, identify factual assertion, verify against reliable evidence.
External evidence should be checked for real-world factual claims.
evidence
required
required
Never fabricate a citation.
Identify unsupported factual certainty.
Qualify or verify the claim.
answerable
0.85
0.15
3
true
false
Stop after evidence requirement is identified.
8
92
14
12
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097997835
reasoning
comparison
general_reasoning
medium
medium
en
Compare two quantities and explain the comparison using only the provided values.
A = 68, B = 47
A is greater than B by 21.
Compare values and compute difference.
Check comparison and difference.
exact
passed
passed
Use only supplied values.
Check comparison direction.
Recompute difference.
answerable
1
0
2
true
false
Stop after comparison verification.
9
93
15
0
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097997836
counterexample
counterexample_analysis
general_reasoning
medium
medium
en
Construct a counterexample that tests whether a general claim always holds.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97997836. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
10
94
16
1
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097997837
evidence_check
evidence_check_analysis
general_reasoning
medium
medium
en
Identify which claims require evidence before they can be asserted confidently.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97997837. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
11
95
17
2
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097997838
logic
deductive_reasoning
logic
medium
medium
en
Determine whether the conclusion follows from the given statements.
If x > 17, then x is positive. x = 17. y = 23.
Conclusion: x is positive. Result: Yes.
Identify premises, apply implication, verify conclusion.
Logical consistency check.
symbolic
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
Reason only from supplied premises.
Check whether conclusion is entailed.
Re-evaluate premises if conclusion conflicts.
answerable
0.99
0.01
2
true
false
Stop once entailment is established.
12
96
18
3
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097997839
fact_check
claim_verification
general_knowledge
medium
medium
en
Assess the claim and state whether it is correct. Do not invent evidence.
The Earth has one natural satellite.
Assessment: Correct. A reliable fact-check should verify the claim against an appropriate authoritative source.
Parse claim, identify factual assertion, verify against reliable evidence.
External evidence should be checked for real-world factual claims.
evidence
required
required
Never fabricate a citation.
Identify unsupported factual certainty.
Qualify or verify the claim.
answerable
0.85
0.15
3
true
false
Stop after evidence requirement is identified.
13
0
19
4
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097997840
ambiguity
ambiguity_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Identify ambiguity in the request and state what information is missing.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97997840. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
14
1
20
5
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097997841
fact_check
claim_verification
general_knowledge
hard
hard
en
Assess the claim and state whether it is correct. Do not invent evidence.
All metals are liquid at room temperature.
Assessment: Incorrect. A reliable fact-check should verify the claim against an appropriate authoritative source.
Parse claim, identify factual assertion, verify against reliable evidence.
External evidence should be checked for real-world factual claims.
evidence
required
required
Never fabricate a citation.
Identify unsupported factual certainty.
Qualify or verify the claim.
answerable
0.85
0.15
3
true
false
Stop after evidence requirement is identified.
15
2
21
6
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097997842
fact_check
claim_verification
general_knowledge
hard
hard
en
Assess the claim and state whether it is correct. Do not invent evidence.
The Earth has one natural satellite.
Assessment: Correct. A reliable fact-check should verify the claim against an appropriate authoritative source.
Parse claim, identify factual assertion, verify against reliable evidence.
External evidence should be checked for real-world factual claims.
evidence
required
required
Never fabricate a citation.
Identify unsupported factual certainty.
Qualify or verify the claim.
answerable
0.85
0.15
3
true
false
Stop after evidence requirement is identified.
16
3
22
7
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097997843
data_analysis
descriptive_statistics
statistics
hard
hard
en
Calculate the arithmetic mean of the supplied dataset.
Dataset: 17, 7, 20, 25, 84
Mean = 30.6000
Parse values, sum them, divide by count, verify.
Recompute sum and count.
exact
passed
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
Use only supplied dataset.
Check arithmetic and denominator.
Recompute statistic.
answerable
1
0
2
true
false
Stop after numerical verification.
0
4
23
8
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097997844
adversarial
adversarial_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Identify a plausible failure mode in the proposed reasoning.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97997844. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
1
5
24
9
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097997845
consistency_check
consistency_check_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Check whether the supplied statements are mutually consistent.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97997845. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
2
6
25
10
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097997846
data_analysis
descriptive_statistics
statistics
hard
hard
en
Calculate the arithmetic mean of the supplied dataset.
Dataset: 22, 68, 66, 74, 44
Mean = 54.8000
Parse values, sum them, divide by count, verify.
Recompute sum and count.
exact
passed
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
Use only supplied dataset.
Check arithmetic and denominator.
Recompute statistic.
answerable
1
0
2
true
false
Stop after numerical verification.
3
7
26
11
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097997847
calibration
calibration_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Explain when a system should reduce confidence in its answer.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97997847. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
4
8
27
12
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097997848
reasoning
comparison
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Compare two quantities and explain the comparison using only the provided values.
A = 36, B = 24
A is greater than B by 12.
Compare values and compute difference.
Check comparison and difference.
exact
passed
passed
Use only supplied values.
Check comparison direction.
Recompute difference.
answerable
1
0
2
true
false
Stop after comparison verification.
5
9
28
0
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097997849
data_analysis
descriptive_statistics
statistics
hard
hard
en
Calculate the arithmetic mean of the supplied dataset.
Dataset: 46, 93, 61, 45, 38
Mean = 56.6000
Parse values, sum them, divide by count, verify.
Recompute sum and count.
exact
passed
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
Use only supplied dataset.
Check arithmetic and denominator.
Recompute statistic.
answerable
1
0
2
true
false
Stop after numerical verification.
6
10
29
1
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097997850
counterexample
counterexample_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Construct a counterexample that tests whether a general claim always holds.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97997850. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
7
11
30
2
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097997851
reasoning
comparison
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Compare two quantities and explain the comparison using only the provided values.
A = 24, B = 74
B is greater than A by 50.
Compare values and compute difference.
Check comparison and difference.
exact
passed
passed
Use only supplied values.
Check comparison direction.
Recompute difference.
answerable
1
0
2
true
false
Stop after comparison verification.
8
12
0
3
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097997852
planning
planning_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Create a concise plan for solving a complex technical problem.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97997852. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
9
13
1
4
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097997853
research
research_methodology
biology
hard
hard
en
Design a rigorous research procedure for investigating a question about biology.
The procedure must distinguish evidence from assumptions and identify uncertainty.
1. Define the research question precisely. 2. Identify measurable variables and hypotheses. 3. Select appropriate primary and secondary sources. 4. Record provenance for each important claim. 5. Compare independent evidence. 6. Identify uncertainty and alternative explanations. 7. Report conclusions separately from obs...
Define question, gather evidence, evaluate sources, quantify uncertainty.
Methodological consistency check.
methodological
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
required
required
Do not invent sources or findings.
Detect unsupported claims.
Remove or qualify unsupported claims.
answerable
0.92
0.08
4
true
false
Stop when methodology is complete and internally coherent.
10
14
2
5
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097997854
self_correction
error_repair
mathematics
hard
hard
en
Identify and correct the numerical error in the proposed answer.
Problem: 11 + 13 Proposed answer: 25
The proposed answer is incorrect. The correct answer is 24.
Recompute independently, compare with proposal, repair mismatch.
Independent recomputation.
exact
passed
Do not trust the proposed answer without verification.
passed
passed
answerable
1
0
3
true
false
Stop after independent correction.
11
15
3
6
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097997855
calibration
calibration_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Explain when a system should reduce confidence in its answer.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97997855. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
12
16
4
7
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097997856
self_correction
error_repair
mathematics
hard
hard
en
Identify and correct the numerical error in the proposed answer.
Problem: 12 + 59 Proposed answer: 76
The proposed answer is incorrect. The correct answer is 71.
Recompute independently, compare with proposal, repair mismatch.
Independent recomputation.
exact
passed
Do not trust the proposed answer without verification.
passed
passed
answerable
1
0
3
true
false
Stop after independent correction.
13
17
5
8
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097997857
instruction_following
format_constraint
general
hard
hard
en
Return the supplied number doubled. Return only the final number.
1183
2366
Identify transformation and output constraint.
Check transformation and requested format.
constraint
passed
passed
passed
No unsupported content.
answerable
1
0
1
true
false
Stop when requested format is satisfied.
14
18
6
9
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097997858
reasoning
comparison
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Compare two quantities and explain the comparison using only the provided values.
A = 11, B = 80
B is greater than A by 69.
Compare values and compute difference.
Check comparison and difference.
exact
passed
passed
Use only supplied values.
Check comparison direction.
Recompute difference.
answerable
1
0
2
true
false
Stop after comparison verification.
15
19
7
10
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097997859
code
function_generation
programming
hard
hard
en
Write Python code that returns the square of an integer.
Input example: n = 94269
def square(n): return n * n
Identify required input/output and implement minimal function.
Static code contract check.
static_contract
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
No external API assumptions.
Check function signature and operation.
Correct implementation if contract is violated.
answerable
0.99
0.01
1
true
false
Stop after contract verification.
16
20
8
11
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097997860
consistency_check
consistency_check_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Check whether the supplied statements are mutually consistent.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97997860. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
0
21
9
12
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097997861
calibration
calibration_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Explain when a system should reduce confidence in its answer.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97997861. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
1
22
10
0
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097997862
prompt_review
prompt_review_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Review the prompt for ambiguity, contradictions, and missing constraints.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97997862. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
2
23
11
1
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097997863
logic
deductive_reasoning
logic
hard
hard
en
Determine whether the conclusion follows from the given statements.
If x > 34, then x is positive. x = 34. y = 42.
Conclusion: x is positive. Result: Yes.
Identify premises, apply implication, verify conclusion.
Logical consistency check.
symbolic
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
Reason only from supplied premises.
Check whether conclusion is entailed.
Re-evaluate premises if conclusion conflicts.
answerable
0.99
0.01
2
true
false
Stop once entailment is established.
3
24
12
2
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097997864
adversarial
adversarial_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Identify a plausible failure mode in the proposed reasoning.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97997864. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
4
25
13
3
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097997865
instruction_following
format_constraint
general
hard
hard
en
Return the supplied number doubled. Return only the final number.
6229
12458
Identify transformation and output constraint.
Check transformation and requested format.
constraint
passed
passed
passed
No unsupported content.
answerable
1
0
1
true
false
Stop when requested format is satisfied.
5
26
14
4
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097997866
calibration
calibration_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Explain when a system should reduce confidence in its answer.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97997866. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
6
27
15
5
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097997867
fact_check
claim_verification
general_knowledge
hard
hard
en
Assess the claim and state whether it is correct. Do not invent evidence.
The Earth has one natural satellite.
Assessment: Correct. A reliable fact-check should verify the claim against an appropriate authoritative source.
Parse claim, identify factual assertion, verify against reliable evidence.
External evidence should be checked for real-world factual claims.
evidence
required
required
Never fabricate a citation.
Identify unsupported factual certainty.
Qualify or verify the claim.
answerable
0.85
0.15
3
true
false
Stop after evidence requirement is identified.
7
28
16
6
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097997868
prompt_review
prompt_review_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Review the prompt for ambiguity, contradictions, and missing constraints.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97997868. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
8
29
17
7
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097997869
self_correction
error_repair
mathematics
hard
hard
en
Identify and correct the numerical error in the proposed answer.
Problem: 56 + 75 Proposed answer: 133
The proposed answer is incorrect. The correct answer is 131.
Recompute independently, compare with proposal, repair mismatch.
Independent recomputation.
exact
passed
Do not trust the proposed answer without verification.
passed
passed
answerable
1
0
3
true
false
Stop after independent correction.
9
30
18
8
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097997870
adversarial
adversarial_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Identify a plausible failure mode in the proposed reasoning.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97997870. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
10
31
19
9
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097997871
instruction_following
format_constraint
general
hard
hard
en
Return the supplied number doubled. Return only the final number.
6479
12958
Identify transformation and output constraint.
Check transformation and requested format.
constraint
passed
passed
passed
No unsupported content.
answerable
1
0
1
true
false
Stop when requested format is satisfied.
11
32
20
10
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097997872
prompt_review
prompt_review_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Review the prompt for ambiguity, contradictions, and missing constraints.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97997872. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
12
33
21
11
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097997873
constraint_reasoning
constraint_reasoning_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Solve a problem while respecting multiple explicit constraints.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97997873. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
13
34
22
12
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097997874
prompt_review
prompt_review_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Review the prompt for ambiguity, contradictions, and missing constraints.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97997874. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
14
35
23
0
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097997875
error_analysis
error_analysis_analysis
general_reasoning
very_hard
very_hard
en
Classify the likely cause of an incorrect answer and propose a repair.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97997875. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
15
36
24
1
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097997876
ambiguity
ambiguity_analysis
general_reasoning
very_hard
very_hard
en
Identify ambiguity in the request and state what information is missing.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97997876. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
16
37
25
2
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097997877
consistency_check
consistency_check_analysis
general_reasoning
very_hard
very_hard
en
Check whether the supplied statements are mutually consistent.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97997877. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
0
38
26
3
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097997878
generalization
generalization_analysis
general_reasoning
very_hard
very_hard
en
Explain how to test whether a model generalizes beyond familiar examples.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97997878. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
1
39
27
4
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097997879
error_analysis
error_analysis_analysis
general_reasoning
very_hard
very_hard
en
Classify the likely cause of an incorrect answer and propose a repair.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97997879. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
2
40
28
5
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097997880
adversarial
adversarial_analysis
general_reasoning
very_hard
very_hard
en
Identify a plausible failure mode in the proposed reasoning.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97997880. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
3
41
29
6
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097997881
data_analysis
descriptive_statistics
statistics
very_hard
very_hard
en
Calculate the arithmetic mean of the supplied dataset.
Dataset: 70, 94, 41, 92, 82
Mean = 75.8000
Parse values, sum them, divide by count, verify.
Recompute sum and count.
exact
passed
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
Use only supplied dataset.
Check arithmetic and denominator.
Recompute statistic.
answerable
1
0
2
true
false
Stop after numerical verification.
4
42
30
7
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097997882
math
arithmetic
mathematics
very_hard
very_hard
en
Solve the following arithmetic problem exactly: 9775 × 286
2795650
Identify operation, compute exactly, verify result.
Exact arithmetic verification.
exact
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
Use only supplied operands.
Check arithmetic operation.
Recompute if mismatch detected.
answerable
1
0
1
true
false
Stop after exact verification.
5
43
0
8
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097997883
reasoning
comparison
general_reasoning
very_hard
very_hard
en
Compare two quantities and explain the comparison using only the provided values.
A = 76, B = 46
A is greater than B by 30.
Compare values and compute difference.
Check comparison and difference.
exact
passed
passed
Use only supplied values.
Check comparison direction.
Recompute difference.
answerable
1
0
2
true
false
Stop after comparison verification.
6
44
1
9
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097997884
math
arithmetic
mathematics
very_hard
very_hard
en
Solve the following arithmetic problem exactly: 221537 - 97546
123991
Identify operation, compute exactly, verify result.
Exact arithmetic verification.
exact
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
Use only supplied operands.
Check arithmetic operation.
Recompute if mismatch detected.
answerable
1
0
1
true
false
Stop after exact verification.
7
45
2
10
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097997885
reasoning
comparison
general_reasoning
very_hard
very_hard
en
Compare two quantities and explain the comparison using only the provided values.
A = 81, B = 73
A is greater than B by 8.
Compare values and compute difference.
Check comparison and difference.
exact
passed
passed
Use only supplied values.
Check comparison direction.
Recompute difference.
answerable
1
0
2
true
false
Stop after comparison verification.
8
46
3
11
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097997886
consistency_check
consistency_check_analysis
general_reasoning
very_hard
very_hard
en
Check whether the supplied statements are mutually consistent.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97997886. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
9
47
4
12
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097997887
instruction_following
format_constraint
general
very_hard
very_hard
en
Return the supplied number doubled. Return only the final number.
836
1672
Identify transformation and output constraint.
Check transformation and requested format.
constraint
passed
passed
passed
No unsupported content.
answerable
1
0
1
true
false
Stop when requested format is satisfied.
10
48
5
0
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097997888
calibration
calibration_analysis
general_reasoning
very_hard
very_hard
en
Explain when a system should reduce confidence in its answer.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97997888. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
11
49
6
1
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097997889
ambiguity
ambiguity_analysis
general_reasoning
very_hard
very_hard
en
Identify ambiguity in the request and state what information is missing.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97997889. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
12
50
7
2
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097997890
planning
planning_analysis
general_reasoning
very_hard
very_hard
en
Create a concise plan for solving a complex technical problem.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97997890. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
13
51
8
3
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097997891
consistency_check
consistency_check_analysis
general_reasoning
very_hard
very_hard
en
Check whether the supplied statements are mutually consistent.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97997891. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
14
52
9
4
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097997892
error_analysis
error_analysis_analysis
general_reasoning
very_hard
very_hard
en
Classify the likely cause of an incorrect answer and propose a repair.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97997892. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
15
53
10
5
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097997893
error_analysis
error_analysis_analysis
general_reasoning
very_hard
very_hard
en
Classify the likely cause of an incorrect answer and propose a repair.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97997893. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
16
54
11
6
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097997894
constraint_reasoning
constraint_reasoning_analysis
general_reasoning
very_hard
very_hard
en
Solve a problem while respecting multiple explicit constraints.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97997894. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
0
55
12
7
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097997895
ambiguity
ambiguity_analysis
general_reasoning
extreme
extreme
en
Identify ambiguity in the request and state what information is missing.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97997895. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
1
56
13
8
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097997896
error_analysis
error_analysis_analysis
general_reasoning
extreme
extreme
en
Classify the likely cause of an incorrect answer and propose a repair.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97997896. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
2
57
14
9
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097997897
calibration
calibration_analysis
general_reasoning
extreme
extreme
en
Explain when a system should reduce confidence in its answer.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97997897. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
3
58
15
10
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097997898
error_analysis
error_analysis_analysis
general_reasoning
extreme
extreme
en
Classify the likely cause of an incorrect answer and propose a repair.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97997898. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
4
59
16
11
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000097997899
counterexample
counterexample_analysis
general_reasoning
extreme
extreme
en
Construct a counterexample that tests whether a general claim always holds.
Synthetic evaluation instance 97997899. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
5
60
17
12
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1