id stringlengths 16 16 | task_family stringclasses 20
values | task_type stringclasses 20
values | domain stringclasses 14
values | difficulty stringclasses 5
values | difficulty_label stringclasses 5
values | language stringclasses 1
value | instruction stringlengths 54 90 | context stringlengths 0 82 | response stringlengths 1 330 | analysis_plan stringclasses 10
values | verification stringclasses 10
values | verification_type stringclasses 7
values | prompt_review stringclasses 2
values | prompt_alignment stringclasses 3
values | constraint_check stringclasses 3
values | consistency_check stringclasses 2
values | math_check stringclasses 3
values | logic_check stringclasses 3
values | counterexample_check stringclasses 2
values | data_analysis_check stringclasses 3
values | code_check stringclasses 3
values | evidence_check stringclasses 3
values | source_check stringclasses 3
values | hallucination_control stringclasses 10
values | error_detection stringclasses 10
values | error_repair stringclasses 10
values | answerability stringclasses 2
values | confidence float32 0.85 1 | uncertainty float32 0 0.15 | reasoning_depth int16 1 4 | minimal_sufficient_reasoning bool 1
class | unnecessary_reasoning bool 1
class | stop_condition stringclasses 10
values | surface_variation int32 0 16 | numeric_variation int32 0 96 | structure_variation int32 0 30 | ood_style int32 0 12 | quality_score float32 0.9 0.9 | synthetic bool 1
class | license stringclasses 1
value | generator_version stringclasses 1
value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
mtd-000000003800 | logic | deductive_reasoning | logic | easy | easy | en | Determine whether the conclusion follows from the given statements. | If x > 33, then x is positive.
x = 33.
y = 32. | Conclusion: x is positive.
Result: Yes. | Identify premises, apply implication, verify conclusion. | Logical consistency check. | symbolic | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | Reason only from supplied premises. | Check whether conclusion is entailed. | Re-evaluate premises if conclusion conflicts. | answerable | 0.99 | 0.01 | 2 | true | false | Stop once entailment is established. | 9 | 17 | 18 | 4 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000000003801 | math | arithmetic | mathematics | easy | easy | en | Solve the following arithmetic problem exactly: 385560 ÷ 357 | 385560 | Identify operation, compute exactly, verify result. | Exact arithmetic verification. | exact | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | Use only supplied operands. | Check arithmetic operation. | Recompute if mismatch detected. | answerable | 1 | 0 | 1 | true | false | Stop after exact verification. | 10 | 18 | 19 | 5 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000003802 | code | function_generation | programming | easy | easy | en | Write Python code that returns the square of an integer. | Input example: n = 94217 | def square(n):
return n * n | Identify required input/output and implement minimal function. | Static code contract check. | static_contract | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | No external API assumptions. | Check function signature and operation. | Correct implementation if contract is violated. | answerable | 0.99 | 0.01 | 1 | true | false | Stop after contract verification. | 11 | 19 | 20 | 6 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000000003803 | prompt_review | prompt_review_analysis | general_reasoning | easy | easy | en | Review the prompt for ambiguity, contradictions, and missing constraints. | Synthetic evaluation instance 3803. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 12 | 20 | 21 | 7 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000003804 | fact_check | claim_verification | general_knowledge | easy | easy | en | Assess the claim and state whether it is correct. Do not invent evidence. | All metals are liquid at room temperature. | Assessment: Incorrect.
A reliable fact-check should verify the claim against an appropriate authoritative source. | Parse claim, identify factual assertion, verify against reliable evidence. | External evidence should be checked for real-world factual claims. | evidence | required | required | Never fabricate a citation. | Identify unsupported factual certainty. | Qualify or verify the claim. | answerable | 0.85 | 0.15 | 3 | true | false | Stop after evidence requirement is identified. | 13 | 21 | 22 | 8 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||||||
mtd-000000003805 | logic | deductive_reasoning | logic | easy | easy | en | Determine whether the conclusion follows from the given statements. | If x > 73, then x is positive.
x = 73.
y = 27. | Conclusion: x is positive.
Result: Yes. | Identify premises, apply implication, verify conclusion. | Logical consistency check. | symbolic | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | Reason only from supplied premises. | Check whether conclusion is entailed. | Re-evaluate premises if conclusion conflicts. | answerable | 0.99 | 0.01 | 2 | true | false | Stop once entailment is established. | 14 | 22 | 23 | 9 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000000003806 | evidence_check | evidence_check_analysis | general_reasoning | easy | easy | en | Identify which claims require evidence before they can be asserted confidently. | Synthetic evaluation instance 3806. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 15 | 23 | 24 | 10 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000003807 | adversarial | adversarial_analysis | general_reasoning | easy | easy | en | Identify a plausible failure mode in the proposed reasoning. | Synthetic evaluation instance 3807. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 16 | 24 | 25 | 11 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000003808 | consistency_check | consistency_check_analysis | general_reasoning | easy | easy | en | Check whether the supplied statements are mutually consistent. | Synthetic evaluation instance 3808. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 0 | 25 | 26 | 12 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000003809 | counterexample | counterexample_analysis | general_reasoning | easy | easy | en | Construct a counterexample that tests whether a general claim always holds. | Synthetic evaluation instance 3809. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 1 | 26 | 27 | 0 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000003810 | research | research_methodology | economics | medium | medium | en | Design a rigorous research procedure for investigating a question about economics. | The procedure must distinguish evidence from assumptions and identify uncertainty. | 1. Define the research question precisely.
2. Identify measurable variables and hypotheses.
3. Select appropriate primary and secondary sources.
4. Record provenance for each important claim.
5. Compare independent evidence.
6. Identify uncertainty and alternative explanations.
7. Report conclusions separately from obs... | Define question, gather evidence, evaluate sources, quantify uncertainty. | Methodological consistency check. | methodological | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | required | required | Do not invent sources or findings. | Detect unsupported claims. | Remove or qualify unsupported claims. | answerable | 0.92 | 0.08 | 4 | true | false | Stop when methodology is complete and internally coherent. | 2 | 27 | 28 | 1 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000000003811 | planning | planning_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Create a concise plan for solving a complex technical problem. | Synthetic evaluation instance 3811. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 3 | 28 | 29 | 2 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000003812 | self_correction | error_repair | mathematics | medium | medium | en | Identify and correct the numerical error in the proposed answer. | Problem: 48 + 73
Proposed answer: 122 | The proposed answer is incorrect. The correct answer is 121. | Recompute independently, compare with proposal, repair mismatch. | Independent recomputation. | exact | passed | Do not trust the proposed answer without verification. | passed | passed | answerable | 1 | 0 | 3 | true | false | Stop after independent correction. | 4 | 29 | 30 | 3 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||||||
mtd-000000003813 | calibration | calibration_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Explain when a system should reduce confidence in its answer. | Synthetic evaluation instance 3813. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 5 | 30 | 0 | 4 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000003814 | data_analysis | descriptive_statistics | statistics | medium | medium | en | Calculate the arithmetic mean of the supplied dataset. | Dataset: 47, 96, 23, 22, 70 | Mean = 51.6000 | Parse values, sum them, divide by count, verify. | Recompute sum and count. | exact | passed | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | Use only supplied dataset. | Check arithmetic and denominator. | Recompute statistic. | answerable | 1 | 0 | 2 | true | false | Stop after numerical verification. | 6 | 31 | 1 | 5 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000000003815 | research | research_methodology | climate science | medium | medium | en | Design a rigorous research procedure for investigating a question about climate science. | The procedure must distinguish evidence from assumptions and identify uncertainty. | 1. Define the research question precisely.
2. Identify measurable variables and hypotheses.
3. Select appropriate primary and secondary sources.
4. Record provenance for each important claim.
5. Compare independent evidence.
6. Identify uncertainty and alternative explanations.
7. Report conclusions separately from obs... | Define question, gather evidence, evaluate sources, quantify uncertainty. | Methodological consistency check. | methodological | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | required | required | Do not invent sources or findings. | Detect unsupported claims. | Remove or qualify unsupported claims. | answerable | 0.92 | 0.08 | 4 | true | false | Stop when methodology is complete and internally coherent. | 7 | 32 | 2 | 6 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000000003816 | prompt_review | prompt_review_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Review the prompt for ambiguity, contradictions, and missing constraints. | Synthetic evaluation instance 3816. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 8 | 33 | 3 | 7 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000003817 | evidence_check | evidence_check_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Identify which claims require evidence before they can be asserted confidently. | Synthetic evaluation instance 3817. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 9 | 34 | 4 | 8 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000003818 | reasoning | comparison | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Compare two quantities and explain the comparison using only the provided values. | A = 56, B = 50 | A is greater than B by 6. | Compare values and compute difference. | Check comparison and difference. | exact | passed | passed | Use only supplied values. | Check comparison direction. | Recompute difference. | answerable | 1 | 0 | 2 | true | false | Stop after comparison verification. | 10 | 35 | 5 | 9 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||||||
mtd-000000003819 | code | function_generation | programming | medium | medium | en | Write Python code that returns the square of an integer. | Input example: n = 59123 | def square(n):
return n * n | Identify required input/output and implement minimal function. | Static code contract check. | static_contract | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | No external API assumptions. | Check function signature and operation. | Correct implementation if contract is violated. | answerable | 0.99 | 0.01 | 1 | true | false | Stop after contract verification. | 11 | 36 | 6 | 10 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000000003820 | constraint_reasoning | constraint_reasoning_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Solve a problem while respecting multiple explicit constraints. | Synthetic evaluation instance 3820. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 12 | 37 | 7 | 11 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000003821 | calibration | calibration_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Explain when a system should reduce confidence in its answer. | Synthetic evaluation instance 3821. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 13 | 38 | 8 | 12 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000003822 | ambiguity | ambiguity_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Identify ambiguity in the request and state what information is missing. | Synthetic evaluation instance 3822. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 14 | 39 | 9 | 0 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000003823 | constraint_reasoning | constraint_reasoning_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Solve a problem while respecting multiple explicit constraints. | Synthetic evaluation instance 3823. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 15 | 40 | 10 | 1 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000003824 | ambiguity | ambiguity_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Identify ambiguity in the request and state what information is missing. | Synthetic evaluation instance 3824. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 16 | 41 | 11 | 2 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000003825 | adversarial | adversarial_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Identify a plausible failure mode in the proposed reasoning. | Synthetic evaluation instance 3825. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 0 | 42 | 12 | 3 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000003826 | counterexample | counterexample_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Construct a counterexample that tests whether a general claim always holds. | Synthetic evaluation instance 3826. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 1 | 43 | 13 | 4 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000003827 | prompt_review | prompt_review_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Review the prompt for ambiguity, contradictions, and missing constraints. | Synthetic evaluation instance 3827. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 2 | 44 | 14 | 5 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000003828 | self_correction | error_repair | mathematics | medium | medium | en | Identify and correct the numerical error in the proposed answer. | Problem: 45 + 48
Proposed answer: 95 | The proposed answer is incorrect. The correct answer is 93. | Recompute independently, compare with proposal, repair mismatch. | Independent recomputation. | exact | passed | Do not trust the proposed answer without verification. | passed | passed | answerable | 1 | 0 | 3 | true | false | Stop after independent correction. | 3 | 45 | 15 | 6 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||||||
mtd-000000003829 | error_analysis | error_analysis_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Classify the likely cause of an incorrect answer and propose a repair. | Synthetic evaluation instance 3829. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 4 | 46 | 16 | 7 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000003830 | ambiguity | ambiguity_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Identify ambiguity in the request and state what information is missing. | Synthetic evaluation instance 3830. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 5 | 47 | 17 | 8 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000003831 | adversarial | adversarial_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Identify a plausible failure mode in the proposed reasoning. | Synthetic evaluation instance 3831. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 6 | 48 | 18 | 9 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000003832 | research | research_methodology | economics | medium | medium | en | Design a rigorous research procedure for investigating a question about economics. | The procedure must distinguish evidence from assumptions and identify uncertainty. | 1. Define the research question precisely.
2. Identify measurable variables and hypotheses.
3. Select appropriate primary and secondary sources.
4. Record provenance for each important claim.
5. Compare independent evidence.
6. Identify uncertainty and alternative explanations.
7. Report conclusions separately from obs... | Define question, gather evidence, evaluate sources, quantify uncertainty. | Methodological consistency check. | methodological | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | required | required | Do not invent sources or findings. | Detect unsupported claims. | Remove or qualify unsupported claims. | answerable | 0.92 | 0.08 | 4 | true | false | Stop when methodology is complete and internally coherent. | 7 | 49 | 19 | 10 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000000003833 | adversarial | adversarial_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Identify a plausible failure mode in the proposed reasoning. | Synthetic evaluation instance 3833. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 8 | 50 | 20 | 11 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000003834 | adversarial | adversarial_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Identify a plausible failure mode in the proposed reasoning. | Synthetic evaluation instance 3834. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 9 | 51 | 21 | 12 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000003835 | calibration | calibration_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Explain when a system should reduce confidence in its answer. | Synthetic evaluation instance 3835. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 10 | 52 | 22 | 0 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000003836 | planning | planning_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Create a concise plan for solving a complex technical problem. | Synthetic evaluation instance 3836. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 11 | 53 | 23 | 1 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000003837 | calibration | calibration_analysis | general_reasoning | medium | medium | en | Explain when a system should reduce confidence in its answer. | Synthetic evaluation instance 3837. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 12 | 54 | 24 | 2 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000003838 | data_analysis | descriptive_statistics | statistics | medium | medium | en | Calculate the arithmetic mean of the supplied dataset. | Dataset: 94, 75, 13, 47, 96 | Mean = 65.0000 | Parse values, sum them, divide by count, verify. | Recompute sum and count. | exact | passed | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | Use only supplied dataset. | Check arithmetic and denominator. | Recompute statistic. | answerable | 1 | 0 | 2 | true | false | Stop after numerical verification. | 13 | 55 | 25 | 3 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000000003839 | code | function_generation | programming | medium | medium | en | Write Python code that returns the square of an integer. | Input example: n = 68550 | def square(n):
return n * n | Identify required input/output and implement minimal function. | Static code contract check. | static_contract | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | No external API assumptions. | Check function signature and operation. | Correct implementation if contract is violated. | answerable | 0.99 | 0.01 | 1 | true | false | Stop after contract verification. | 14 | 56 | 26 | 4 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000000003840 | calibration | calibration_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Explain when a system should reduce confidence in its answer. | Synthetic evaluation instance 3840. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 15 | 57 | 27 | 5 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000003841 | consistency_check | consistency_check_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Check whether the supplied statements are mutually consistent. | Synthetic evaluation instance 3841. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 16 | 58 | 28 | 6 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000003842 | reasoning | comparison | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Compare two quantities and explain the comparison using only the provided values. | A = 95, B = 40 | A is greater than B by 55. | Compare values and compute difference. | Check comparison and difference. | exact | passed | passed | Use only supplied values. | Check comparison direction. | Recompute difference. | answerable | 1 | 0 | 2 | true | false | Stop after comparison verification. | 0 | 59 | 29 | 7 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||||||
mtd-000000003843 | ambiguity | ambiguity_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Identify ambiguity in the request and state what information is missing. | Synthetic evaluation instance 3843. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 1 | 60 | 30 | 8 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000003844 | logic | deductive_reasoning | logic | hard | hard | en | Determine whether the conclusion follows from the given statements. | If x > 20, then x is positive.
x = 20.
y = 30. | Conclusion: x is positive.
Result: Yes. | Identify premises, apply implication, verify conclusion. | Logical consistency check. | symbolic | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | Reason only from supplied premises. | Check whether conclusion is entailed. | Re-evaluate premises if conclusion conflicts. | answerable | 0.99 | 0.01 | 2 | true | false | Stop once entailment is established. | 2 | 61 | 0 | 9 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000000003845 | logic | deductive_reasoning | logic | hard | hard | en | Determine whether the conclusion follows from the given statements. | If x > 42, then x is positive.
x = 42.
y = 90. | Conclusion: x is positive.
Result: Yes. | Identify premises, apply implication, verify conclusion. | Logical consistency check. | symbolic | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | Reason only from supplied premises. | Check whether conclusion is entailed. | Re-evaluate premises if conclusion conflicts. | answerable | 0.99 | 0.01 | 2 | true | false | Stop once entailment is established. | 3 | 62 | 1 | 10 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000000003846 | reasoning | comparison | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Compare two quantities and explain the comparison using only the provided values. | A = 68, B = 82 | B is greater than A by 14. | Compare values and compute difference. | Check comparison and difference. | exact | passed | passed | Use only supplied values. | Check comparison direction. | Recompute difference. | answerable | 1 | 0 | 2 | true | false | Stop after comparison verification. | 4 | 63 | 2 | 11 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||||||
mtd-000000003847 | error_analysis | error_analysis_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Classify the likely cause of an incorrect answer and propose a repair. | Synthetic evaluation instance 3847. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 5 | 64 | 3 | 12 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000003848 | ambiguity | ambiguity_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Identify ambiguity in the request and state what information is missing. | Synthetic evaluation instance 3848. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 6 | 65 | 4 | 0 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000003849 | prompt_review | prompt_review_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Review the prompt for ambiguity, contradictions, and missing constraints. | Synthetic evaluation instance 3849. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 7 | 66 | 5 | 1 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000003850 | ambiguity | ambiguity_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Identify ambiguity in the request and state what information is missing. | Synthetic evaluation instance 3850. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 8 | 67 | 6 | 2 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000003851 | consistency_check | consistency_check_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Check whether the supplied statements are mutually consistent. | Synthetic evaluation instance 3851. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 9 | 68 | 7 | 3 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000003852 | adversarial | adversarial_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Identify a plausible failure mode in the proposed reasoning. | Synthetic evaluation instance 3852. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 10 | 69 | 8 | 4 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000003853 | instruction_following | format_constraint | general | hard | hard | en | Return the supplied number doubled. Return only the final number. | 5370 | 10740 | Identify transformation and output constraint. | Check transformation and requested format. | constraint | passed | passed | passed | No unsupported content. | answerable | 1 | 0 | 1 | true | false | Stop when requested format is satisfied. | 11 | 70 | 9 | 5 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||||||
mtd-000000003854 | prompt_review | prompt_review_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Review the prompt for ambiguity, contradictions, and missing constraints. | Synthetic evaluation instance 3854. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 12 | 71 | 10 | 6 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000003855 | consistency_check | consistency_check_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Check whether the supplied statements are mutually consistent. | Synthetic evaluation instance 3855. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 13 | 72 | 11 | 7 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000003856 | counterexample | counterexample_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Construct a counterexample that tests whether a general claim always holds. | Synthetic evaluation instance 3856. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 14 | 73 | 12 | 8 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000003857 | prompt_review | prompt_review_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Review the prompt for ambiguity, contradictions, and missing constraints. | Synthetic evaluation instance 3857. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 15 | 74 | 13 | 9 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000003858 | adversarial | adversarial_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Identify a plausible failure mode in the proposed reasoning. | Synthetic evaluation instance 3858. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 16 | 75 | 14 | 10 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000003859 | evidence_check | evidence_check_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Identify which claims require evidence before they can be asserted confidently. | Synthetic evaluation instance 3859. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 0 | 76 | 15 | 11 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000003860 | code | function_generation | programming | hard | hard | en | Write Python code that returns the square of an integer. | Input example: n = 60271 | def square(n):
return n * n | Identify required input/output and implement minimal function. | Static code contract check. | static_contract | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | No external API assumptions. | Check function signature and operation. | Correct implementation if contract is violated. | answerable | 0.99 | 0.01 | 1 | true | false | Stop after contract verification. | 1 | 77 | 16 | 12 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000000003861 | math | arithmetic | mathematics | hard | hard | en | Solve the following arithmetic problem exactly: 851057 + 96927 | 947984 | Identify operation, compute exactly, verify result. | Exact arithmetic verification. | exact | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | Use only supplied operands. | Check arithmetic operation. | Recompute if mismatch detected. | answerable | 1 | 0 | 1 | true | false | Stop after exact verification. | 2 | 78 | 17 | 0 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000003862 | evidence_check | evidence_check_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Identify which claims require evidence before they can be asserted confidently. | Synthetic evaluation instance 3862. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 3 | 79 | 18 | 1 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000003863 | adversarial | adversarial_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Identify a plausible failure mode in the proposed reasoning. | Synthetic evaluation instance 3863. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 4 | 80 | 19 | 2 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000003864 | reasoning | comparison | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Compare two quantities and explain the comparison using only the provided values. | A = 83, B = 33 | A is greater than B by 50. | Compare values and compute difference. | Check comparison and difference. | exact | passed | passed | Use only supplied values. | Check comparison direction. | Recompute difference. | answerable | 1 | 0 | 2 | true | false | Stop after comparison verification. | 5 | 81 | 20 | 3 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||||||
mtd-000000003865 | logic | deductive_reasoning | logic | hard | hard | en | Determine whether the conclusion follows from the given statements. | If x > 47, then x is positive.
x = 47.
y = 44. | Conclusion: x is positive.
Result: Yes. | Identify premises, apply implication, verify conclusion. | Logical consistency check. | symbolic | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | Reason only from supplied premises. | Check whether conclusion is entailed. | Re-evaluate premises if conclusion conflicts. | answerable | 0.99 | 0.01 | 2 | true | false | Stop once entailment is established. | 6 | 82 | 21 | 4 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000000003866 | planning | planning_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Create a concise plan for solving a complex technical problem. | Synthetic evaluation instance 3866. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 7 | 83 | 22 | 5 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000003867 | evidence_check | evidence_check_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Identify which claims require evidence before they can be asserted confidently. | Synthetic evaluation instance 3867. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 8 | 84 | 23 | 6 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000003868 | data_analysis | descriptive_statistics | statistics | hard | hard | en | Calculate the arithmetic mean of the supplied dataset. | Dataset: 40, 18, 70, 97, 15 | Mean = 48.0000 | Parse values, sum them, divide by count, verify. | Recompute sum and count. | exact | passed | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | Use only supplied dataset. | Check arithmetic and denominator. | Recompute statistic. | answerable | 1 | 0 | 2 | true | false | Stop after numerical verification. | 9 | 85 | 24 | 7 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000000003869 | data_analysis | descriptive_statistics | statistics | hard | hard | en | Calculate the arithmetic mean of the supplied dataset. | Dataset: 96, 37, 28, 50, 10 | Mean = 44.2000 | Parse values, sum them, divide by count, verify. | Recompute sum and count. | exact | passed | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | Use only supplied dataset. | Check arithmetic and denominator. | Recompute statistic. | answerable | 1 | 0 | 2 | true | false | Stop after numerical verification. | 10 | 86 | 25 | 8 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000000003870 | reasoning | comparison | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Compare two quantities and explain the comparison using only the provided values. | A = 69, B = 22 | A is greater than B by 47. | Compare values and compute difference. | Check comparison and difference. | exact | passed | passed | Use only supplied values. | Check comparison direction. | Recompute difference. | answerable | 1 | 0 | 2 | true | false | Stop after comparison verification. | 11 | 87 | 26 | 9 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||||||
mtd-000000003871 | data_analysis | descriptive_statistics | statistics | hard | hard | en | Calculate the arithmetic mean of the supplied dataset. | Dataset: 83, 82, 42, 80, 48 | Mean = 67.0000 | Parse values, sum them, divide by count, verify. | Recompute sum and count. | exact | passed | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | Use only supplied dataset. | Check arithmetic and denominator. | Recompute statistic. | answerable | 1 | 0 | 2 | true | false | Stop after numerical verification. | 12 | 88 | 27 | 10 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000000003872 | logic | deductive_reasoning | logic | hard | hard | en | Determine whether the conclusion follows from the given statements. | If x > 86, then x is positive.
x = 86.
y = 87. | Conclusion: x is positive.
Result: Yes. | Identify premises, apply implication, verify conclusion. | Logical consistency check. | symbolic | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | Reason only from supplied premises. | Check whether conclusion is entailed. | Re-evaluate premises if conclusion conflicts. | answerable | 0.99 | 0.01 | 2 | true | false | Stop once entailment is established. | 13 | 89 | 28 | 11 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000000003873 | evidence_check | evidence_check_analysis | general_reasoning | hard | hard | en | Identify which claims require evidence before they can be asserted confidently. | Synthetic evaluation instance 3873. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 14 | 90 | 29 | 12 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000003874 | fact_check | claim_verification | general_knowledge | hard | hard | en | Assess the claim and state whether it is correct. Do not invent evidence. | The Earth has one natural satellite. | Assessment: Correct.
A reliable fact-check should verify the claim against an appropriate authoritative source. | Parse claim, identify factual assertion, verify against reliable evidence. | External evidence should be checked for real-world factual claims. | evidence | required | required | Never fabricate a citation. | Identify unsupported factual certainty. | Qualify or verify the claim. | answerable | 0.85 | 0.15 | 3 | true | false | Stop after evidence requirement is identified. | 15 | 91 | 30 | 0 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||||||
mtd-000000003875 | calibration | calibration_analysis | general_reasoning | very_hard | very_hard | en | Explain when a system should reduce confidence in its answer. | Synthetic evaluation instance 3875. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 16 | 92 | 0 | 1 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000003876 | consistency_check | consistency_check_analysis | general_reasoning | very_hard | very_hard | en | Check whether the supplied statements are mutually consistent. | Synthetic evaluation instance 3876. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 0 | 93 | 1 | 2 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000003877 | fact_check | claim_verification | general_knowledge | very_hard | very_hard | en | Assess the claim and state whether it is correct. Do not invent evidence. | All metals are liquid at room temperature. | Assessment: Incorrect.
A reliable fact-check should verify the claim against an appropriate authoritative source. | Parse claim, identify factual assertion, verify against reliable evidence. | External evidence should be checked for real-world factual claims. | evidence | required | required | Never fabricate a citation. | Identify unsupported factual certainty. | Qualify or verify the claim. | answerable | 0.85 | 0.15 | 3 | true | false | Stop after evidence requirement is identified. | 1 | 94 | 2 | 3 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||||||
mtd-000000003878 | consistency_check | consistency_check_analysis | general_reasoning | very_hard | very_hard | en | Check whether the supplied statements are mutually consistent. | Synthetic evaluation instance 3878. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 2 | 95 | 3 | 4 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000003879 | calibration | calibration_analysis | general_reasoning | very_hard | very_hard | en | Explain when a system should reduce confidence in its answer. | Synthetic evaluation instance 3879. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 3 | 96 | 4 | 5 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000003880 | constraint_reasoning | constraint_reasoning_analysis | general_reasoning | very_hard | very_hard | en | Solve a problem while respecting multiple explicit constraints. | Synthetic evaluation instance 3880. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 4 | 0 | 5 | 6 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000003881 | generalization | generalization_analysis | general_reasoning | very_hard | very_hard | en | Explain how to test whether a model generalizes beyond familiar examples. | Synthetic evaluation instance 3881. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 5 | 1 | 6 | 7 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000003882 | consistency_check | consistency_check_analysis | general_reasoning | very_hard | very_hard | en | Check whether the supplied statements are mutually consistent. | Synthetic evaluation instance 3882. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 6 | 2 | 7 | 8 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000003883 | evidence_check | evidence_check_analysis | general_reasoning | very_hard | very_hard | en | Identify which claims require evidence before they can be asserted confidently. | Synthetic evaluation instance 3883. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 7 | 3 | 8 | 9 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000003884 | logic | deductive_reasoning | logic | very_hard | very_hard | en | Determine whether the conclusion follows from the given statements. | If x > 34, then x is positive.
x = 34.
y = 75. | Conclusion: x is positive.
Result: Yes. | Identify premises, apply implication, verify conclusion. | Logical consistency check. | symbolic | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | Reason only from supplied premises. | Check whether conclusion is entailed. | Re-evaluate premises if conclusion conflicts. | answerable | 0.99 | 0.01 | 2 | true | false | Stop once entailment is established. | 8 | 4 | 9 | 10 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000000003885 | error_analysis | error_analysis_analysis | general_reasoning | very_hard | very_hard | en | Classify the likely cause of an incorrect answer and propose a repair. | Synthetic evaluation instance 3885. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 9 | 5 | 10 | 11 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000003886 | research | research_methodology | materials science | very_hard | very_hard | en | Design a rigorous research procedure for investigating a question about materials science. | The procedure must distinguish evidence from assumptions and identify uncertainty. | 1. Define the research question precisely.
2. Identify measurable variables and hypotheses.
3. Select appropriate primary and secondary sources.
4. Record provenance for each important claim.
5. Compare independent evidence.
6. Identify uncertainty and alternative explanations.
7. Report conclusions separately from obs... | Define question, gather evidence, evaluate sources, quantify uncertainty. | Methodological consistency check. | methodological | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | required | required | Do not invent sources or findings. | Detect unsupported claims. | Remove or qualify unsupported claims. | answerable | 0.92 | 0.08 | 4 | true | false | Stop when methodology is complete and internally coherent. | 10 | 6 | 11 | 12 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000000003887 | code | function_generation | programming | very_hard | very_hard | en | Write Python code that returns the square of an integer. | Input example: n = 82823 | def square(n):
return n * n | Identify required input/output and implement minimal function. | Static code contract check. | static_contract | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | No external API assumptions. | Check function signature and operation. | Correct implementation if contract is violated. | answerable | 0.99 | 0.01 | 1 | true | false | Stop after contract verification. | 11 | 7 | 12 | 0 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000000003888 | research | research_methodology | biology | very_hard | very_hard | en | Design a rigorous research procedure for investigating a question about biology. | The procedure must distinguish evidence from assumptions and identify uncertainty. | 1. Define the research question precisely.
2. Identify measurable variables and hypotheses.
3. Select appropriate primary and secondary sources.
4. Record provenance for each important claim.
5. Compare independent evidence.
6. Identify uncertainty and alternative explanations.
7. Report conclusions separately from obs... | Define question, gather evidence, evaluate sources, quantify uncertainty. | Methodological consistency check. | methodological | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | required | required | Do not invent sources or findings. | Detect unsupported claims. | Remove or qualify unsupported claims. | answerable | 0.92 | 0.08 | 4 | true | false | Stop when methodology is complete and internally coherent. | 12 | 8 | 13 | 1 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000000003889 | instruction_following | format_constraint | general | very_hard | very_hard | en | Return the supplied number doubled. Return only the final number. | 8311 | 16622 | Identify transformation and output constraint. | Check transformation and requested format. | constraint | passed | passed | passed | No unsupported content. | answerable | 1 | 0 | 1 | true | false | Stop when requested format is satisfied. | 13 | 9 | 14 | 2 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||||||
mtd-000000003890 | evidence_check | evidence_check_analysis | general_reasoning | very_hard | very_hard | en | Identify which claims require evidence before they can be asserted confidently. | Synthetic evaluation instance 3890. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 14 | 10 | 15 | 3 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000003891 | constraint_reasoning | constraint_reasoning_analysis | general_reasoning | very_hard | very_hard | en | Solve a problem while respecting multiple explicit constraints. | Synthetic evaluation instance 3891. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 15 | 11 | 16 | 4 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000003892 | constraint_reasoning | constraint_reasoning_analysis | general_reasoning | very_hard | very_hard | en | Solve a problem while respecting multiple explicit constraints. | Synthetic evaluation instance 3892. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 16 | 12 | 17 | 5 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000003893 | research | research_methodology | economics | very_hard | very_hard | en | Design a rigorous research procedure for investigating a question about economics. | The procedure must distinguish evidence from assumptions and identify uncertainty. | 1. Define the research question precisely.
2. Identify measurable variables and hypotheses.
3. Select appropriate primary and secondary sources.
4. Record provenance for each important claim.
5. Compare independent evidence.
6. Identify uncertainty and alternative explanations.
7. Report conclusions separately from obs... | Define question, gather evidence, evaluate sources, quantify uncertainty. | Methodological consistency check. | methodological | not_applicable | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | required | required | Do not invent sources or findings. | Detect unsupported claims. | Remove or qualify unsupported claims. | answerable | 0.92 | 0.08 | 4 | true | false | Stop when methodology is complete and internally coherent. | 0 | 13 | 18 | 6 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | |||||
mtd-000000003894 | calibration | calibration_analysis | general_reasoning | very_hard | very_hard | en | Explain when a system should reduce confidence in its answer. | Synthetic evaluation instance 3894. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 1 | 14 | 19 | 7 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000003895 | adversarial | adversarial_analysis | general_reasoning | extreme | extreme | en | Identify a plausible failure mode in the proposed reasoning. | Synthetic evaluation instance 3895. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 2 | 15 | 20 | 8 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000003896 | adversarial | adversarial_analysis | general_reasoning | extreme | extreme | en | Identify a plausible failure mode in the proposed reasoning. | Synthetic evaluation instance 3896. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 3 | 16 | 21 | 9 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000003897 | counterexample | counterexample_analysis | general_reasoning | extreme | extreme | en | Construct a counterexample that tests whether a general claim always holds. | Synthetic evaluation instance 3897. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 4 | 17 | 22 | 10 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000003898 | evidence_check | evidence_check_analysis | general_reasoning | extreme | extreme | en | Identify which claims require evidence before they can be asserted confidently. | Synthetic evaluation instance 3898. Use only information provided in the task. | Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied. | Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify. | Final consistency and constraint verification. | structured | performed | checked | checked | checked | checked | Do not introduce unsupported facts. | Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions. | Correct detected inconsistencies. | conditionally_answerable | 0.9 | 0.1 | 4 | true | false | Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied. | 5 | 18 | 23 | 11 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 | ||||||
mtd-000000003899 | math | arithmetic | mathematics | extreme | extreme | en | Solve the following arithmetic problem exactly: 7772 × 450 | 3497400 | Identify operation, compute exactly, verify result. | Exact arithmetic verification. | exact | passed | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | not_applicable | Use only supplied operands. | Check arithmetic operation. | Recompute if mismatch detected. | answerable | 1 | 0 | 1 | true | false | Stop after exact verification. | 6 | 19 | 24 | 12 | 0.9 | true | CC-BY-4.0 | v1.1 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.