id
stringlengths
16
16
task_family
stringclasses
20 values
task_type
stringclasses
20 values
domain
stringclasses
14 values
difficulty
stringclasses
5 values
difficulty_label
stringclasses
5 values
language
stringclasses
1 value
instruction
stringlengths
54
90
context
stringlengths
0
82
response
stringlengths
1
330
analysis_plan
stringclasses
10 values
verification
stringclasses
10 values
verification_type
stringclasses
7 values
prompt_review
stringclasses
2 values
prompt_alignment
stringclasses
3 values
constraint_check
stringclasses
3 values
consistency_check
stringclasses
2 values
math_check
stringclasses
3 values
logic_check
stringclasses
3 values
counterexample_check
stringclasses
2 values
data_analysis_check
stringclasses
3 values
code_check
stringclasses
3 values
evidence_check
stringclasses
3 values
source_check
stringclasses
3 values
hallucination_control
stringclasses
10 values
error_detection
stringclasses
10 values
error_repair
stringclasses
10 values
answerability
stringclasses
2 values
confidence
float32
0.85
1
uncertainty
float32
0
0.15
reasoning_depth
int16
1
4
minimal_sufficient_reasoning
bool
1 class
unnecessary_reasoning
bool
1 class
stop_condition
stringclasses
10 values
surface_variation
int32
0
16
numeric_variation
int32
0
96
structure_variation
int32
0
30
ood_style
int32
0
12
quality_score
float32
0.9
0.9
synthetic
bool
1 class
license
stringclasses
1 value
generator_version
stringclasses
1 value
mtd-000000003100
research
research_methodology
machine learning
easy
easy
en
Design a rigorous research procedure for investigating a question about machine learning.
The procedure must distinguish evidence from assumptions and identify uncertainty.
1. Define the research question precisely. 2. Identify measurable variables and hypotheses. 3. Select appropriate primary and secondary sources. 4. Record provenance for each important claim. 5. Compare independent evidence. 6. Identify uncertainty and alternative explanations. 7. Report conclusions separately from obs...
Define question, gather evidence, evaluate sources, quantify uncertainty.
Methodological consistency check.
methodological
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
required
required
Do not invent sources or findings.
Detect unsupported claims.
Remove or qualify unsupported claims.
answerable
0.92
0.08
4
true
false
Stop when methodology is complete and internally coherent.
6
93
0
6
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000003101
self_correction
error_repair
mathematics
easy
easy
en
Identify and correct the numerical error in the proposed answer.
Problem: 68 + 54 Proposed answer: 123
The proposed answer is incorrect. The correct answer is 122.
Recompute independently, compare with proposal, repair mismatch.
Independent recomputation.
exact
passed
Do not trust the proposed answer without verification.
passed
passed
answerable
1
0
3
true
false
Stop after independent correction.
7
94
1
7
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000003102
fact_check
claim_verification
general_knowledge
easy
easy
en
Assess the claim and state whether it is correct. Do not invent evidence.
Water freezes at 0°C under standard atmospheric pressure.
Assessment: Correct. A reliable fact-check should verify the claim against an appropriate authoritative source.
Parse claim, identify factual assertion, verify against reliable evidence.
External evidence should be checked for real-world factual claims.
evidence
required
required
Never fabricate a citation.
Identify unsupported factual certainty.
Qualify or verify the claim.
answerable
0.85
0.15
3
true
false
Stop after evidence requirement is identified.
8
95
2
8
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000003103
prompt_review
prompt_review_analysis
general_reasoning
easy
easy
en
Review the prompt for ambiguity, contradictions, and missing constraints.
Synthetic evaluation instance 3103. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
9
96
3
9
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000003104
evidence_check
evidence_check_analysis
general_reasoning
easy
easy
en
Identify which claims require evidence before they can be asserted confidently.
Synthetic evaluation instance 3104. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
10
0
4
10
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000003105
research
research_methodology
materials science
easy
easy
en
Design a rigorous research procedure for investigating a question about materials science.
The procedure must distinguish evidence from assumptions and identify uncertainty.
1. Define the research question precisely. 2. Identify measurable variables and hypotheses. 3. Select appropriate primary and secondary sources. 4. Record provenance for each important claim. 5. Compare independent evidence. 6. Identify uncertainty and alternative explanations. 7. Report conclusions separately from obs...
Define question, gather evidence, evaluate sources, quantify uncertainty.
Methodological consistency check.
methodological
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
required
required
Do not invent sources or findings.
Detect unsupported claims.
Remove or qualify unsupported claims.
answerable
0.92
0.08
4
true
false
Stop when methodology is complete and internally coherent.
11
1
5
11
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000003106
adversarial
adversarial_analysis
general_reasoning
easy
easy
en
Identify a plausible failure mode in the proposed reasoning.
Synthetic evaluation instance 3106. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
12
2
6
12
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000003107
code
function_generation
programming
easy
easy
en
Write Python code that returns the square of an integer.
Input example: n = 8879
def square(n): return n * n
Identify required input/output and implement minimal function.
Static code contract check.
static_contract
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
No external API assumptions.
Check function signature and operation.
Correct implementation if contract is violated.
answerable
0.99
0.01
1
true
false
Stop after contract verification.
13
3
7
0
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000003108
counterexample
counterexample_analysis
general_reasoning
easy
easy
en
Construct a counterexample that tests whether a general claim always holds.
Synthetic evaluation instance 3108. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
14
4
8
1
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000003109
evidence_check
evidence_check_analysis
general_reasoning
easy
easy
en
Identify which claims require evidence before they can be asserted confidently.
Synthetic evaluation instance 3109. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
15
5
9
2
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000003110
self_correction
error_repair
mathematics
medium
medium
en
Identify and correct the numerical error in the proposed answer.
Problem: 54 + 38 Proposed answer: 93
The proposed answer is incorrect. The correct answer is 92.
Recompute independently, compare with proposal, repair mismatch.
Independent recomputation.
exact
passed
Do not trust the proposed answer without verification.
passed
passed
answerable
1
0
3
true
false
Stop after independent correction.
16
6
10
3
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000003111
reasoning
comparison
general_reasoning
medium
medium
en
Compare two quantities and explain the comparison using only the provided values.
A = 50, B = 71
B is greater than A by 21.
Compare values and compute difference.
Check comparison and difference.
exact
passed
passed
Use only supplied values.
Check comparison direction.
Recompute difference.
answerable
1
0
2
true
false
Stop after comparison verification.
0
7
11
4
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000003112
prompt_review
prompt_review_analysis
general_reasoning
medium
medium
en
Review the prompt for ambiguity, contradictions, and missing constraints.
Synthetic evaluation instance 3112. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
1
8
12
5
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000003113
instruction_following
format_constraint
general
medium
medium
en
Return the supplied number doubled. Return only the final number.
9261
18522
Identify transformation and output constraint.
Check transformation and requested format.
constraint
passed
passed
passed
No unsupported content.
answerable
1
0
1
true
false
Stop when requested format is satisfied.
2
9
13
6
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000003114
ambiguity
ambiguity_analysis
general_reasoning
medium
medium
en
Identify ambiguity in the request and state what information is missing.
Synthetic evaluation instance 3114. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
3
10
14
7
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000003115
instruction_following
format_constraint
general
medium
medium
en
Return the supplied number doubled. Return only the final number.
9061
18122
Identify transformation and output constraint.
Check transformation and requested format.
constraint
passed
passed
passed
No unsupported content.
answerable
1
0
1
true
false
Stop when requested format is satisfied.
4
11
15
8
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000003116
data_analysis
descriptive_statistics
statistics
medium
medium
en
Calculate the arithmetic mean of the supplied dataset.
Dataset: 84, 36, 93, 57, 61
Mean = 66.2000
Parse values, sum them, divide by count, verify.
Recompute sum and count.
exact
passed
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
Use only supplied dataset.
Check arithmetic and denominator.
Recompute statistic.
answerable
1
0
2
true
false
Stop after numerical verification.
5
12
16
9
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000003117
prompt_review
prompt_review_analysis
general_reasoning
medium
medium
en
Review the prompt for ambiguity, contradictions, and missing constraints.
Synthetic evaluation instance 3117. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
6
13
17
10
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000003118
instruction_following
format_constraint
general
medium
medium
en
Return the supplied number doubled. Return only the final number.
2532
5064
Identify transformation and output constraint.
Check transformation and requested format.
constraint
passed
passed
passed
No unsupported content.
answerable
1
0
1
true
false
Stop when requested format is satisfied.
7
14
18
11
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000003119
self_correction
error_repair
mathematics
medium
medium
en
Identify and correct the numerical error in the proposed answer.
Problem: 16 + 20 Proposed answer: 42
The proposed answer is incorrect. The correct answer is 36.
Recompute independently, compare with proposal, repair mismatch.
Independent recomputation.
exact
passed
Do not trust the proposed answer without verification.
passed
passed
answerable
1
0
3
true
false
Stop after independent correction.
8
15
19
12
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000003120
self_correction
error_repair
mathematics
medium
medium
en
Identify and correct the numerical error in the proposed answer.
Problem: 78 + 29 Proposed answer: 112
The proposed answer is incorrect. The correct answer is 107.
Recompute independently, compare with proposal, repair mismatch.
Independent recomputation.
exact
passed
Do not trust the proposed answer without verification.
passed
passed
answerable
1
0
3
true
false
Stop after independent correction.
9
16
20
0
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000003121
instruction_following
format_constraint
general
medium
medium
en
Return the supplied number doubled. Return only the final number.
5121
10242
Identify transformation and output constraint.
Check transformation and requested format.
constraint
passed
passed
passed
No unsupported content.
answerable
1
0
1
true
false
Stop when requested format is satisfied.
10
17
21
1
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000003122
self_correction
error_repair
mathematics
medium
medium
en
Identify and correct the numerical error in the proposed answer.
Problem: 53 + 63 Proposed answer: 117
The proposed answer is incorrect. The correct answer is 116.
Recompute independently, compare with proposal, repair mismatch.
Independent recomputation.
exact
passed
Do not trust the proposed answer without verification.
passed
passed
answerable
1
0
3
true
false
Stop after independent correction.
11
18
22
2
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000003123
fact_check
claim_verification
general_knowledge
medium
medium
en
Assess the claim and state whether it is correct. Do not invent evidence.
All metals are liquid at room temperature.
Assessment: Incorrect. A reliable fact-check should verify the claim against an appropriate authoritative source.
Parse claim, identify factual assertion, verify against reliable evidence.
External evidence should be checked for real-world factual claims.
evidence
required
required
Never fabricate a citation.
Identify unsupported factual certainty.
Qualify or verify the claim.
answerable
0.85
0.15
3
true
false
Stop after evidence requirement is identified.
12
19
23
3
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000003124
reasoning
comparison
general_reasoning
medium
medium
en
Compare two quantities and explain the comparison using only the provided values.
A = 74, B = 57
A is greater than B by 17.
Compare values and compute difference.
Check comparison and difference.
exact
passed
passed
Use only supplied values.
Check comparison direction.
Recompute difference.
answerable
1
0
2
true
false
Stop after comparison verification.
13
20
24
4
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000003125
generalization
generalization_analysis
general_reasoning
medium
medium
en
Explain how to test whether a model generalizes beyond familiar examples.
Synthetic evaluation instance 3125. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
14
21
25
5
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000003126
self_correction
error_repair
mathematics
medium
medium
en
Identify and correct the numerical error in the proposed answer.
Problem: 89 + 39 Proposed answer: 130
The proposed answer is incorrect. The correct answer is 128.
Recompute independently, compare with proposal, repair mismatch.
Independent recomputation.
exact
passed
Do not trust the proposed answer without verification.
passed
passed
answerable
1
0
3
true
false
Stop after independent correction.
15
22
26
6
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000003127
instruction_following
format_constraint
general
medium
medium
en
Return the supplied number doubled. Return only the final number.
9936
19872
Identify transformation and output constraint.
Check transformation and requested format.
constraint
passed
passed
passed
No unsupported content.
answerable
1
0
1
true
false
Stop when requested format is satisfied.
16
23
27
7
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000003128
counterexample
counterexample_analysis
general_reasoning
medium
medium
en
Construct a counterexample that tests whether a general claim always holds.
Synthetic evaluation instance 3128. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
0
24
28
8
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000003129
reasoning
comparison
general_reasoning
medium
medium
en
Compare two quantities and explain the comparison using only the provided values.
A = 21, B = 27
B is greater than A by 6.
Compare values and compute difference.
Check comparison and difference.
exact
passed
passed
Use only supplied values.
Check comparison direction.
Recompute difference.
answerable
1
0
2
true
false
Stop after comparison verification.
1
25
29
9
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000003130
math
arithmetic
mathematics
medium
medium
en
Solve the following arithmetic problem exactly: 844554 - 709019
135535
Identify operation, compute exactly, verify result.
Exact arithmetic verification.
exact
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
Use only supplied operands.
Check arithmetic operation.
Recompute if mismatch detected.
answerable
1
0
1
true
false
Stop after exact verification.
2
26
30
10
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000003131
constraint_reasoning
constraint_reasoning_analysis
general_reasoning
medium
medium
en
Solve a problem while respecting multiple explicit constraints.
Synthetic evaluation instance 3131. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
3
27
0
11
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000003132
evidence_check
evidence_check_analysis
general_reasoning
medium
medium
en
Identify which claims require evidence before they can be asserted confidently.
Synthetic evaluation instance 3132. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
4
28
1
12
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000003133
evidence_check
evidence_check_analysis
general_reasoning
medium
medium
en
Identify which claims require evidence before they can be asserted confidently.
Synthetic evaluation instance 3133. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
5
29
2
0
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000003134
self_correction
error_repair
mathematics
medium
medium
en
Identify and correct the numerical error in the proposed answer.
Problem: 50 + 15 Proposed answer: 66
The proposed answer is incorrect. The correct answer is 65.
Recompute independently, compare with proposal, repair mismatch.
Independent recomputation.
exact
passed
Do not trust the proposed answer without verification.
passed
passed
answerable
1
0
3
true
false
Stop after independent correction.
6
30
3
1
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000003135
instruction_following
format_constraint
general
medium
medium
en
Return the supplied number doubled. Return only the final number.
4000
8000
Identify transformation and output constraint.
Check transformation and requested format.
constraint
passed
passed
passed
No unsupported content.
answerable
1
0
1
true
false
Stop when requested format is satisfied.
7
31
4
2
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000003136
calibration
calibration_analysis
general_reasoning
medium
medium
en
Explain when a system should reduce confidence in its answer.
Synthetic evaluation instance 3136. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
8
32
5
3
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000003137
constraint_reasoning
constraint_reasoning_analysis
general_reasoning
medium
medium
en
Solve a problem while respecting multiple explicit constraints.
Synthetic evaluation instance 3137. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
9
33
6
4
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000003138
fact_check
claim_verification
general_knowledge
medium
medium
en
Assess the claim and state whether it is correct. Do not invent evidence.
All metals are liquid at room temperature.
Assessment: Incorrect. A reliable fact-check should verify the claim against an appropriate authoritative source.
Parse claim, identify factual assertion, verify against reliable evidence.
External evidence should be checked for real-world factual claims.
evidence
required
required
Never fabricate a citation.
Identify unsupported factual certainty.
Qualify or verify the claim.
answerable
0.85
0.15
3
true
false
Stop after evidence requirement is identified.
10
34
7
5
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000003139
constraint_reasoning
constraint_reasoning_analysis
general_reasoning
medium
medium
en
Solve a problem while respecting multiple explicit constraints.
Synthetic evaluation instance 3139. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
11
35
8
6
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000003140
math
arithmetic
mathematics
hard
hard
en
Solve the following arithmetic problem exactly: 431448 - 114982
316466
Identify operation, compute exactly, verify result.
Exact arithmetic verification.
exact
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
Use only supplied operands.
Check arithmetic operation.
Recompute if mismatch detected.
answerable
1
0
1
true
false
Stop after exact verification.
12
36
9
7
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000003141
error_analysis
error_analysis_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Classify the likely cause of an incorrect answer and propose a repair.
Synthetic evaluation instance 3141. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
13
37
10
8
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000003142
consistency_check
consistency_check_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Check whether the supplied statements are mutually consistent.
Synthetic evaluation instance 3142. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
14
38
11
9
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000003143
evidence_check
evidence_check_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Identify which claims require evidence before they can be asserted confidently.
Synthetic evaluation instance 3143. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
15
39
12
10
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000003144
constraint_reasoning
constraint_reasoning_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Solve a problem while respecting multiple explicit constraints.
Synthetic evaluation instance 3144. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
16
40
13
11
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000003145
constraint_reasoning
constraint_reasoning_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Solve a problem while respecting multiple explicit constraints.
Synthetic evaluation instance 3145. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
0
41
14
12
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000003146
evidence_check
evidence_check_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Identify which claims require evidence before they can be asserted confidently.
Synthetic evaluation instance 3146. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
1
42
15
0
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000003147
math
arithmetic
mathematics
hard
hard
en
Solve the following arithmetic problem exactly: 805002 - 635960
169042
Identify operation, compute exactly, verify result.
Exact arithmetic verification.
exact
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
Use only supplied operands.
Check arithmetic operation.
Recompute if mismatch detected.
answerable
1
0
1
true
false
Stop after exact verification.
2
43
16
1
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000003148
adversarial
adversarial_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Identify a plausible failure mode in the proposed reasoning.
Synthetic evaluation instance 3148. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
3
44
17
2
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000003149
self_correction
error_repair
mathematics
hard
hard
en
Identify and correct the numerical error in the proposed answer.
Problem: 44 + 72 Proposed answer: 119
The proposed answer is incorrect. The correct answer is 116.
Recompute independently, compare with proposal, repair mismatch.
Independent recomputation.
exact
passed
Do not trust the proposed answer without verification.
passed
passed
answerable
1
0
3
true
false
Stop after independent correction.
4
45
18
3
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000003150
self_correction
error_repair
mathematics
hard
hard
en
Identify and correct the numerical error in the proposed answer.
Problem: 42 + 51 Proposed answer: 96
The proposed answer is incorrect. The correct answer is 93.
Recompute independently, compare with proposal, repair mismatch.
Independent recomputation.
exact
passed
Do not trust the proposed answer without verification.
passed
passed
answerable
1
0
3
true
false
Stop after independent correction.
5
46
19
4
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000003151
counterexample
counterexample_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Construct a counterexample that tests whether a general claim always holds.
Synthetic evaluation instance 3151. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
6
47
20
5
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000003152
consistency_check
consistency_check_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Check whether the supplied statements are mutually consistent.
Synthetic evaluation instance 3152. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
7
48
21
6
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000003153
logic
deductive_reasoning
logic
hard
hard
en
Determine whether the conclusion follows from the given statements.
If x > 96, then x is positive. x = 96. y = 53.
Conclusion: x is positive. Result: Yes.
Identify premises, apply implication, verify conclusion.
Logical consistency check.
symbolic
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
Reason only from supplied premises.
Check whether conclusion is entailed.
Re-evaluate premises if conclusion conflicts.
answerable
0.99
0.01
2
true
false
Stop once entailment is established.
8
49
22
7
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000003154
self_correction
error_repair
mathematics
hard
hard
en
Identify and correct the numerical error in the proposed answer.
Problem: 65 + 20 Proposed answer: 90
The proposed answer is incorrect. The correct answer is 85.
Recompute independently, compare with proposal, repair mismatch.
Independent recomputation.
exact
passed
Do not trust the proposed answer without verification.
passed
passed
answerable
1
0
3
true
false
Stop after independent correction.
9
50
23
8
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000003155
fact_check
claim_verification
general_knowledge
hard
hard
en
Assess the claim and state whether it is correct. Do not invent evidence.
Water freezes at 0°C under standard atmospheric pressure.
Assessment: Correct. A reliable fact-check should verify the claim against an appropriate authoritative source.
Parse claim, identify factual assertion, verify against reliable evidence.
External evidence should be checked for real-world factual claims.
evidence
required
required
Never fabricate a citation.
Identify unsupported factual certainty.
Qualify or verify the claim.
answerable
0.85
0.15
3
true
false
Stop after evidence requirement is identified.
10
51
24
9
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000003156
fact_check
claim_verification
general_knowledge
hard
hard
en
Assess the claim and state whether it is correct. Do not invent evidence.
Water freezes at 0°C under standard atmospheric pressure.
Assessment: Correct. A reliable fact-check should verify the claim against an appropriate authoritative source.
Parse claim, identify factual assertion, verify against reliable evidence.
External evidence should be checked for real-world factual claims.
evidence
required
required
Never fabricate a citation.
Identify unsupported factual certainty.
Qualify or verify the claim.
answerable
0.85
0.15
3
true
false
Stop after evidence requirement is identified.
11
52
25
10
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000003157
code
function_generation
programming
hard
hard
en
Write Python code that returns the square of an integer.
Input example: n = 86922
def square(n): return n * n
Identify required input/output and implement minimal function.
Static code contract check.
static_contract
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
No external API assumptions.
Check function signature and operation.
Correct implementation if contract is violated.
answerable
0.99
0.01
1
true
false
Stop after contract verification.
12
53
26
11
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000003158
data_analysis
descriptive_statistics
statistics
hard
hard
en
Calculate the arithmetic mean of the supplied dataset.
Dataset: 45, 99, 48, 96, 99
Mean = 77.4000
Parse values, sum them, divide by count, verify.
Recompute sum and count.
exact
passed
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
Use only supplied dataset.
Check arithmetic and denominator.
Recompute statistic.
answerable
1
0
2
true
false
Stop after numerical verification.
13
54
27
12
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000003159
counterexample
counterexample_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Construct a counterexample that tests whether a general claim always holds.
Synthetic evaluation instance 3159. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
14
55
28
0
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000003160
constraint_reasoning
constraint_reasoning_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Solve a problem while respecting multiple explicit constraints.
Synthetic evaluation instance 3160. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
15
56
29
1
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000003161
self_correction
error_repair
mathematics
hard
hard
en
Identify and correct the numerical error in the proposed answer.
Problem: 20 + 44 Proposed answer: 73
The proposed answer is incorrect. The correct answer is 64.
Recompute independently, compare with proposal, repair mismatch.
Independent recomputation.
exact
passed
Do not trust the proposed answer without verification.
passed
passed
answerable
1
0
3
true
false
Stop after independent correction.
16
57
30
2
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000003162
calibration
calibration_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Explain when a system should reduce confidence in its answer.
Synthetic evaluation instance 3162. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
0
58
0
3
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000003163
fact_check
claim_verification
general_knowledge
hard
hard
en
Assess the claim and state whether it is correct. Do not invent evidence.
All metals are liquid at room temperature.
Assessment: Incorrect. A reliable fact-check should verify the claim against an appropriate authoritative source.
Parse claim, identify factual assertion, verify against reliable evidence.
External evidence should be checked for real-world factual claims.
evidence
required
required
Never fabricate a citation.
Identify unsupported factual certainty.
Qualify or verify the claim.
answerable
0.85
0.15
3
true
false
Stop after evidence requirement is identified.
1
59
1
4
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000003164
instruction_following
format_constraint
general
hard
hard
en
Return the supplied number doubled. Return only the final number.
7990
15980
Identify transformation and output constraint.
Check transformation and requested format.
constraint
passed
passed
passed
No unsupported content.
answerable
1
0
1
true
false
Stop when requested format is satisfied.
2
60
2
5
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000003165
code
function_generation
programming
hard
hard
en
Write Python code that returns the square of an integer.
Input example: n = 62788
def square(n): return n * n
Identify required input/output and implement minimal function.
Static code contract check.
static_contract
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
No external API assumptions.
Check function signature and operation.
Correct implementation if contract is violated.
answerable
0.99
0.01
1
true
false
Stop after contract verification.
3
61
3
6
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000003166
counterexample
counterexample_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Construct a counterexample that tests whether a general claim always holds.
Synthetic evaluation instance 3166. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
4
62
4
7
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000003167
prompt_review
prompt_review_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Review the prompt for ambiguity, contradictions, and missing constraints.
Synthetic evaluation instance 3167. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
5
63
5
8
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000003168
constraint_reasoning
constraint_reasoning_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Solve a problem while respecting multiple explicit constraints.
Synthetic evaluation instance 3168. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
6
64
6
9
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000003169
constraint_reasoning
constraint_reasoning_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Solve a problem while respecting multiple explicit constraints.
Synthetic evaluation instance 3169. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
7
65
7
10
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000003170
counterexample
counterexample_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Construct a counterexample that tests whether a general claim always holds.
Synthetic evaluation instance 3170. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
8
66
8
11
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000003171
generalization
generalization_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Explain how to test whether a model generalizes beyond familiar examples.
Synthetic evaluation instance 3171. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
9
67
9
12
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000003172
constraint_reasoning
constraint_reasoning_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Solve a problem while respecting multiple explicit constraints.
Synthetic evaluation instance 3172. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
10
68
10
0
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000003173
math
arithmetic
mathematics
hard
hard
en
Solve the following arithmetic problem exactly: 2276660 ÷ 268
2276660
Identify operation, compute exactly, verify result.
Exact arithmetic verification.
exact
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
Use only supplied operands.
Check arithmetic operation.
Recompute if mismatch detected.
answerable
1
0
1
true
false
Stop after exact verification.
11
69
11
1
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000003174
fact_check
claim_verification
general_knowledge
hard
hard
en
Assess the claim and state whether it is correct. Do not invent evidence.
The Earth has one natural satellite.
Assessment: Correct. A reliable fact-check should verify the claim against an appropriate authoritative source.
Parse claim, identify factual assertion, verify against reliable evidence.
External evidence should be checked for real-world factual claims.
evidence
required
required
Never fabricate a citation.
Identify unsupported factual certainty.
Qualify or verify the claim.
answerable
0.85
0.15
3
true
false
Stop after evidence requirement is identified.
12
70
12
2
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000003175
consistency_check
consistency_check_analysis
general_reasoning
very_hard
very_hard
en
Check whether the supplied statements are mutually consistent.
Synthetic evaluation instance 3175. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
13
71
13
3
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000003176
data_analysis
descriptive_statistics
statistics
very_hard
very_hard
en
Calculate the arithmetic mean of the supplied dataset.
Dataset: 21, 82, 4, 18, 67
Mean = 38.4000
Parse values, sum them, divide by count, verify.
Recompute sum and count.
exact
passed
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
Use only supplied dataset.
Check arithmetic and denominator.
Recompute statistic.
answerable
1
0
2
true
false
Stop after numerical verification.
14
72
14
4
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000003177
math
arithmetic
mathematics
very_hard
very_hard
en
Solve the following arithmetic problem exactly: 361855 - 116419
245436
Identify operation, compute exactly, verify result.
Exact arithmetic verification.
exact
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
Use only supplied operands.
Check arithmetic operation.
Recompute if mismatch detected.
answerable
1
0
1
true
false
Stop after exact verification.
15
73
15
5
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000003178
reasoning
comparison
general_reasoning
very_hard
very_hard
en
Compare two quantities and explain the comparison using only the provided values.
A = 34, B = 71
B is greater than A by 37.
Compare values and compute difference.
Check comparison and difference.
exact
passed
passed
Use only supplied values.
Check comparison direction.
Recompute difference.
answerable
1
0
2
true
false
Stop after comparison verification.
16
74
16
6
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000003179
counterexample
counterexample_analysis
general_reasoning
very_hard
very_hard
en
Construct a counterexample that tests whether a general claim always holds.
Synthetic evaluation instance 3179. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
0
75
17
7
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000003180
fact_check
claim_verification
general_knowledge
very_hard
very_hard
en
Assess the claim and state whether it is correct. Do not invent evidence.
All metals are liquid at room temperature.
Assessment: Incorrect. A reliable fact-check should verify the claim against an appropriate authoritative source.
Parse claim, identify factual assertion, verify against reliable evidence.
External evidence should be checked for real-world factual claims.
evidence
required
required
Never fabricate a citation.
Identify unsupported factual certainty.
Qualify or verify the claim.
answerable
0.85
0.15
3
true
false
Stop after evidence requirement is identified.
1
76
18
8
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000003181
research
research_methodology
materials science
very_hard
very_hard
en
Design a rigorous research procedure for investigating a question about materials science.
The procedure must distinguish evidence from assumptions and identify uncertainty.
1. Define the research question precisely. 2. Identify measurable variables and hypotheses. 3. Select appropriate primary and secondary sources. 4. Record provenance for each important claim. 5. Compare independent evidence. 6. Identify uncertainty and alternative explanations. 7. Report conclusions separately from obs...
Define question, gather evidence, evaluate sources, quantify uncertainty.
Methodological consistency check.
methodological
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
required
required
Do not invent sources or findings.
Detect unsupported claims.
Remove or qualify unsupported claims.
answerable
0.92
0.08
4
true
false
Stop when methodology is complete and internally coherent.
2
77
19
9
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000003182
math
arithmetic
mathematics
very_hard
very_hard
en
Solve the following arithmetic problem exactly: 2546 × 176
448096
Identify operation, compute exactly, verify result.
Exact arithmetic verification.
exact
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
Use only supplied operands.
Check arithmetic operation.
Recompute if mismatch detected.
answerable
1
0
1
true
false
Stop after exact verification.
3
78
20
10
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000003183
adversarial
adversarial_analysis
general_reasoning
very_hard
very_hard
en
Identify a plausible failure mode in the proposed reasoning.
Synthetic evaluation instance 3183. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
4
79
21
11
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000003184
data_analysis
descriptive_statistics
statistics
very_hard
very_hard
en
Calculate the arithmetic mean of the supplied dataset.
Dataset: 44, 66, 12, 25, 72
Mean = 43.8000
Parse values, sum them, divide by count, verify.
Recompute sum and count.
exact
passed
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
Use only supplied dataset.
Check arithmetic and denominator.
Recompute statistic.
answerable
1
0
2
true
false
Stop after numerical verification.
5
80
22
12
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000003185
code
function_generation
programming
very_hard
very_hard
en
Write Python code that returns the square of an integer.
Input example: n = 42543
def square(n): return n * n
Identify required input/output and implement minimal function.
Static code contract check.
static_contract
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
No external API assumptions.
Check function signature and operation.
Correct implementation if contract is violated.
answerable
0.99
0.01
1
true
false
Stop after contract verification.
6
81
23
0
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000003186
instruction_following
format_constraint
general
very_hard
very_hard
en
Return the supplied number doubled. Return only the final number.
6565
13130
Identify transformation and output constraint.
Check transformation and requested format.
constraint
passed
passed
passed
No unsupported content.
answerable
1
0
1
true
false
Stop when requested format is satisfied.
7
82
24
1
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000003187
consistency_check
consistency_check_analysis
general_reasoning
very_hard
very_hard
en
Check whether the supplied statements are mutually consistent.
Synthetic evaluation instance 3187. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
8
83
25
2
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000003188
evidence_check
evidence_check_analysis
general_reasoning
very_hard
very_hard
en
Identify which claims require evidence before they can be asserted confidently.
Synthetic evaluation instance 3188. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
9
84
26
3
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000003189
error_analysis
error_analysis_analysis
general_reasoning
very_hard
very_hard
en
Classify the likely cause of an incorrect answer and propose a repair.
Synthetic evaluation instance 3189. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
10
85
27
4
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000003190
instruction_following
format_constraint
general
very_hard
very_hard
en
Return the supplied number doubled. Return only the final number.
6244
12488
Identify transformation and output constraint.
Check transformation and requested format.
constraint
passed
passed
passed
No unsupported content.
answerable
1
0
1
true
false
Stop when requested format is satisfied.
11
86
28
5
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000003191
consistency_check
consistency_check_analysis
general_reasoning
very_hard
very_hard
en
Check whether the supplied statements are mutually consistent.
Synthetic evaluation instance 3191. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
12
87
29
6
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000003192
consistency_check
consistency_check_analysis
general_reasoning
very_hard
very_hard
en
Check whether the supplied statements are mutually consistent.
Synthetic evaluation instance 3192. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
13
88
30
7
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000003193
adversarial
adversarial_analysis
general_reasoning
very_hard
very_hard
en
Identify a plausible failure mode in the proposed reasoning.
Synthetic evaluation instance 3193. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
14
89
0
8
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000003194
adversarial
adversarial_analysis
general_reasoning
very_hard
very_hard
en
Identify a plausible failure mode in the proposed reasoning.
Synthetic evaluation instance 3194. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
15
90
1
9
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000003195
adversarial
adversarial_analysis
general_reasoning
extreme
extreme
en
Identify a plausible failure mode in the proposed reasoning.
Synthetic evaluation instance 3195. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
16
91
2
10
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000003196
logic
deductive_reasoning
logic
extreme
extreme
en
Determine whether the conclusion follows from the given statements.
If x > 26, then x is positive. x = 26. y = 26.
Conclusion: x is positive. Result: Yes.
Identify premises, apply implication, verify conclusion.
Logical consistency check.
symbolic
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
Reason only from supplied premises.
Check whether conclusion is entailed.
Re-evaluate premises if conclusion conflicts.
answerable
0.99
0.01
2
true
false
Stop once entailment is established.
0
92
3
11
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000003197
data_analysis
descriptive_statistics
statistics
extreme
extreme
en
Calculate the arithmetic mean of the supplied dataset.
Dataset: 40, 67, 52, 1, 93
Mean = 50.6000
Parse values, sum them, divide by count, verify.
Recompute sum and count.
exact
passed
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
Use only supplied dataset.
Check arithmetic and denominator.
Recompute statistic.
answerable
1
0
2
true
false
Stop after numerical verification.
1
93
4
12
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000003198
code
function_generation
programming
extreme
extreme
en
Write Python code that returns the square of an integer.
Input example: n = 5127
def square(n): return n * n
Identify required input/output and implement minimal function.
Static code contract check.
static_contract
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
No external API assumptions.
Check function signature and operation.
Correct implementation if contract is violated.
answerable
0.99
0.01
1
true
false
Stop after contract verification.
2
94
5
0
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000003199
adversarial
adversarial_analysis
general_reasoning
extreme
extreme
en
Identify a plausible failure mode in the proposed reasoning.
Synthetic evaluation instance 3199. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
3
95
6
1
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1