id
stringlengths
16
16
task_family
stringclasses
20 values
task_type
stringclasses
20 values
domain
stringclasses
14 values
difficulty
stringclasses
5 values
difficulty_label
stringclasses
5 values
language
stringclasses
1 value
instruction
stringlengths
54
90
context
stringlengths
0
82
response
stringlengths
1
330
analysis_plan
stringclasses
10 values
verification
stringclasses
10 values
verification_type
stringclasses
7 values
prompt_review
stringclasses
2 values
prompt_alignment
stringclasses
3 values
constraint_check
stringclasses
3 values
consistency_check
stringclasses
2 values
math_check
stringclasses
3 values
logic_check
stringclasses
3 values
counterexample_check
stringclasses
2 values
data_analysis_check
stringclasses
3 values
code_check
stringclasses
3 values
evidence_check
stringclasses
3 values
source_check
stringclasses
3 values
hallucination_control
stringclasses
10 values
error_detection
stringclasses
10 values
error_repair
stringclasses
10 values
answerability
stringclasses
2 values
confidence
float32
0.85
1
uncertainty
float32
0
0.15
reasoning_depth
int16
1
4
minimal_sufficient_reasoning
bool
1 class
unnecessary_reasoning
bool
1 class
stop_condition
stringclasses
10 values
surface_variation
int32
0
16
numeric_variation
int32
0
96
structure_variation
int32
0
30
ood_style
int32
0
12
quality_score
float32
0.9
0.9
synthetic
bool
1 class
license
stringclasses
1 value
generator_version
stringclasses
1 value
mtd-000000002000
data_analysis
descriptive_statistics
statistics
easy
easy
en
Calculate the arithmetic mean of the supplied dataset.
Dataset: 29, 94, 47, 41, 1
Mean = 42.4000
Parse values, sum them, divide by count, verify.
Recompute sum and count.
exact
passed
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
Use only supplied dataset.
Check arithmetic and denominator.
Recompute statistic.
answerable
1
0
2
true
false
Stop after numerical verification.
11
60
16
11
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000002001
self_correction
error_repair
mathematics
easy
easy
en
Identify and correct the numerical error in the proposed answer.
Problem: 57 + 41 Proposed answer: 102
The proposed answer is incorrect. The correct answer is 98.
Recompute independently, compare with proposal, repair mismatch.
Independent recomputation.
exact
passed
Do not trust the proposed answer without verification.
passed
passed
answerable
1
0
3
true
false
Stop after independent correction.
12
61
17
12
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000002002
instruction_following
format_constraint
general
easy
easy
en
Return the supplied number doubled. Return only the final number.
5618
11236
Identify transformation and output constraint.
Check transformation and requested format.
constraint
passed
passed
passed
No unsupported content.
answerable
1
0
1
true
false
Stop when requested format is satisfied.
13
62
18
0
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000002003
instruction_following
format_constraint
general
easy
easy
en
Return the supplied number doubled. Return only the final number.
1118
2236
Identify transformation and output constraint.
Check transformation and requested format.
constraint
passed
passed
passed
No unsupported content.
answerable
1
0
1
true
false
Stop when requested format is satisfied.
14
63
19
1
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000002004
calibration
calibration_analysis
general_reasoning
easy
easy
en
Explain when a system should reduce confidence in its answer.
Synthetic evaluation instance 2004. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
15
64
20
2
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000002005
self_correction
error_repair
mathematics
easy
easy
en
Identify and correct the numerical error in the proposed answer.
Problem: 25 + 59 Proposed answer: 88
The proposed answer is incorrect. The correct answer is 84.
Recompute independently, compare with proposal, repair mismatch.
Independent recomputation.
exact
passed
Do not trust the proposed answer without verification.
passed
passed
answerable
1
0
3
true
false
Stop after independent correction.
16
65
21
3
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000002006
prompt_review
prompt_review_analysis
general_reasoning
easy
easy
en
Review the prompt for ambiguity, contradictions, and missing constraints.
Synthetic evaluation instance 2006. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
0
66
22
4
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000002007
research
research_methodology
climate science
easy
easy
en
Design a rigorous research procedure for investigating a question about climate science.
The procedure must distinguish evidence from assumptions and identify uncertainty.
1. Define the research question precisely. 2. Identify measurable variables and hypotheses. 3. Select appropriate primary and secondary sources. 4. Record provenance for each important claim. 5. Compare independent evidence. 6. Identify uncertainty and alternative explanations. 7. Report conclusions separately from obs...
Define question, gather evidence, evaluate sources, quantify uncertainty.
Methodological consistency check.
methodological
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
required
required
Do not invent sources or findings.
Detect unsupported claims.
Remove or qualify unsupported claims.
answerable
0.92
0.08
4
true
false
Stop when methodology is complete and internally coherent.
1
67
23
5
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000002008
adversarial
adversarial_analysis
general_reasoning
easy
easy
en
Identify a plausible failure mode in the proposed reasoning.
Synthetic evaluation instance 2008. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
2
68
24
6
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000002009
evidence_check
evidence_check_analysis
general_reasoning
easy
easy
en
Identify which claims require evidence before they can be asserted confidently.
Synthetic evaluation instance 2009. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
3
69
25
7
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000002010
planning
planning_analysis
general_reasoning
medium
medium
en
Create a concise plan for solving a complex technical problem.
Synthetic evaluation instance 2010. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
4
70
26
8
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000002011
research
research_methodology
computer security
medium
medium
en
Design a rigorous research procedure for investigating a question about computer security.
The procedure must distinguish evidence from assumptions and identify uncertainty.
1. Define the research question precisely. 2. Identify measurable variables and hypotheses. 3. Select appropriate primary and secondary sources. 4. Record provenance for each important claim. 5. Compare independent evidence. 6. Identify uncertainty and alternative explanations. 7. Report conclusions separately from obs...
Define question, gather evidence, evaluate sources, quantify uncertainty.
Methodological consistency check.
methodological
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
required
required
Do not invent sources or findings.
Detect unsupported claims.
Remove or qualify unsupported claims.
answerable
0.92
0.08
4
true
false
Stop when methodology is complete and internally coherent.
5
71
27
9
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000002012
fact_check
claim_verification
general_knowledge
medium
medium
en
Assess the claim and state whether it is correct. Do not invent evidence.
A triangle has four sides.
Assessment: Incorrect. A reliable fact-check should verify the claim against an appropriate authoritative source.
Parse claim, identify factual assertion, verify against reliable evidence.
External evidence should be checked for real-world factual claims.
evidence
required
required
Never fabricate a citation.
Identify unsupported factual certainty.
Qualify or verify the claim.
answerable
0.85
0.15
3
true
false
Stop after evidence requirement is identified.
6
72
28
10
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000002013
generalization
generalization_analysis
general_reasoning
medium
medium
en
Explain how to test whether a model generalizes beyond familiar examples.
Synthetic evaluation instance 2013. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
7
73
29
11
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000002014
evidence_check
evidence_check_analysis
general_reasoning
medium
medium
en
Identify which claims require evidence before they can be asserted confidently.
Synthetic evaluation instance 2014. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
8
74
30
12
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000002015
error_analysis
error_analysis_analysis
general_reasoning
medium
medium
en
Classify the likely cause of an incorrect answer and propose a repair.
Synthetic evaluation instance 2015. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
9
75
0
0
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000002016
code
function_generation
programming
medium
medium
en
Write Python code that returns the square of an integer.
Input example: n = 67353
def square(n): return n * n
Identify required input/output and implement minimal function.
Static code contract check.
static_contract
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
No external API assumptions.
Check function signature and operation.
Correct implementation if contract is violated.
answerable
0.99
0.01
1
true
false
Stop after contract verification.
10
76
1
1
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000002017
research
research_methodology
astronomy
medium
medium
en
Design a rigorous research procedure for investigating a question about astronomy.
The procedure must distinguish evidence from assumptions and identify uncertainty.
1. Define the research question precisely. 2. Identify measurable variables and hypotheses. 3. Select appropriate primary and secondary sources. 4. Record provenance for each important claim. 5. Compare independent evidence. 6. Identify uncertainty and alternative explanations. 7. Report conclusions separately from obs...
Define question, gather evidence, evaluate sources, quantify uncertainty.
Methodological consistency check.
methodological
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
required
required
Do not invent sources or findings.
Detect unsupported claims.
Remove or qualify unsupported claims.
answerable
0.92
0.08
4
true
false
Stop when methodology is complete and internally coherent.
11
77
2
2
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000002018
constraint_reasoning
constraint_reasoning_analysis
general_reasoning
medium
medium
en
Solve a problem while respecting multiple explicit constraints.
Synthetic evaluation instance 2018. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
12
78
3
3
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000002019
counterexample
counterexample_analysis
general_reasoning
medium
medium
en
Construct a counterexample that tests whether a general claim always holds.
Synthetic evaluation instance 2019. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
13
79
4
4
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000002020
code
function_generation
programming
medium
medium
en
Write Python code that returns the square of an integer.
Input example: n = 68714
def square(n): return n * n
Identify required input/output and implement minimal function.
Static code contract check.
static_contract
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
No external API assumptions.
Check function signature and operation.
Correct implementation if contract is violated.
answerable
0.99
0.01
1
true
false
Stop after contract verification.
14
80
5
5
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000002021
code
function_generation
programming
medium
medium
en
Write Python code that returns the square of an integer.
Input example: n = 67411
def square(n): return n * n
Identify required input/output and implement minimal function.
Static code contract check.
static_contract
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
No external API assumptions.
Check function signature and operation.
Correct implementation if contract is violated.
answerable
0.99
0.01
1
true
false
Stop after contract verification.
15
81
6
6
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000002022
adversarial
adversarial_analysis
general_reasoning
medium
medium
en
Identify a plausible failure mode in the proposed reasoning.
Synthetic evaluation instance 2022. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
16
82
7
7
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000002023
consistency_check
consistency_check_analysis
general_reasoning
medium
medium
en
Check whether the supplied statements are mutually consistent.
Synthetic evaluation instance 2023. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
0
83
8
8
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000002024
research
research_methodology
economics
medium
medium
en
Design a rigorous research procedure for investigating a question about economics.
The procedure must distinguish evidence from assumptions and identify uncertainty.
1. Define the research question precisely. 2. Identify measurable variables and hypotheses. 3. Select appropriate primary and secondary sources. 4. Record provenance for each important claim. 5. Compare independent evidence. 6. Identify uncertainty and alternative explanations. 7. Report conclusions separately from obs...
Define question, gather evidence, evaluate sources, quantify uncertainty.
Methodological consistency check.
methodological
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
required
required
Do not invent sources or findings.
Detect unsupported claims.
Remove or qualify unsupported claims.
answerable
0.92
0.08
4
true
false
Stop when methodology is complete and internally coherent.
1
84
9
9
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000002025
code
function_generation
programming
medium
medium
en
Write Python code that returns the square of an integer.
Input example: n = 71729
def square(n): return n * n
Identify required input/output and implement minimal function.
Static code contract check.
static_contract
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
No external API assumptions.
Check function signature and operation.
Correct implementation if contract is violated.
answerable
0.99
0.01
1
true
false
Stop after contract verification.
2
85
10
10
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000002026
math
arithmetic
mathematics
medium
medium
en
Solve the following arithmetic problem exactly: 719696 - 417194
302502
Identify operation, compute exactly, verify result.
Exact arithmetic verification.
exact
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
Use only supplied operands.
Check arithmetic operation.
Recompute if mismatch detected.
answerable
1
0
1
true
false
Stop after exact verification.
3
86
11
11
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000002027
reasoning
comparison
general_reasoning
medium
medium
en
Compare two quantities and explain the comparison using only the provided values.
A = 82, B = 14
A is greater than B by 68.
Compare values and compute difference.
Check comparison and difference.
exact
passed
passed
Use only supplied values.
Check comparison direction.
Recompute difference.
answerable
1
0
2
true
false
Stop after comparison verification.
4
87
12
12
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000002028
evidence_check
evidence_check_analysis
general_reasoning
medium
medium
en
Identify which claims require evidence before they can be asserted confidently.
Synthetic evaluation instance 2028. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
5
88
13
0
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000002029
planning
planning_analysis
general_reasoning
medium
medium
en
Create a concise plan for solving a complex technical problem.
Synthetic evaluation instance 2029. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
6
89
14
1
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000002030
math
arithmetic
mathematics
medium
medium
en
Solve the following arithmetic problem exactly: 2277130 ÷ 305
2277130
Identify operation, compute exactly, verify result.
Exact arithmetic verification.
exact
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
Use only supplied operands.
Check arithmetic operation.
Recompute if mismatch detected.
answerable
1
0
1
true
false
Stop after exact verification.
7
90
15
2
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000002031
code
function_generation
programming
medium
medium
en
Write Python code that returns the square of an integer.
Input example: n = 88362
def square(n): return n * n
Identify required input/output and implement minimal function.
Static code contract check.
static_contract
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
No external API assumptions.
Check function signature and operation.
Correct implementation if contract is violated.
answerable
0.99
0.01
1
true
false
Stop after contract verification.
8
91
16
3
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000002032
consistency_check
consistency_check_analysis
general_reasoning
medium
medium
en
Check whether the supplied statements are mutually consistent.
Synthetic evaluation instance 2032. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
9
92
17
4
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000002033
evidence_check
evidence_check_analysis
general_reasoning
medium
medium
en
Identify which claims require evidence before they can be asserted confidently.
Synthetic evaluation instance 2033. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
10
93
18
5
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000002034
calibration
calibration_analysis
general_reasoning
medium
medium
en
Explain when a system should reduce confidence in its answer.
Synthetic evaluation instance 2034. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
11
94
19
6
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000002035
logic
deductive_reasoning
logic
medium
medium
en
Determine whether the conclusion follows from the given statements.
If x > 12, then x is positive. x = 12. y = 37.
Conclusion: x is positive. Result: Yes.
Identify premises, apply implication, verify conclusion.
Logical consistency check.
symbolic
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
Reason only from supplied premises.
Check whether conclusion is entailed.
Re-evaluate premises if conclusion conflicts.
answerable
0.99
0.01
2
true
false
Stop once entailment is established.
12
95
20
7
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000002036
constraint_reasoning
constraint_reasoning_analysis
general_reasoning
medium
medium
en
Solve a problem while respecting multiple explicit constraints.
Synthetic evaluation instance 2036. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
13
96
21
8
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000002037
logic
deductive_reasoning
logic
medium
medium
en
Determine whether the conclusion follows from the given statements.
If x > 47, then x is positive. x = 47. y = 5.
Conclusion: x is positive. Result: Yes.
Identify premises, apply implication, verify conclusion.
Logical consistency check.
symbolic
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
Reason only from supplied premises.
Check whether conclusion is entailed.
Re-evaluate premises if conclusion conflicts.
answerable
0.99
0.01
2
true
false
Stop once entailment is established.
14
0
22
9
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000002038
adversarial
adversarial_analysis
general_reasoning
medium
medium
en
Identify a plausible failure mode in the proposed reasoning.
Synthetic evaluation instance 2038. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
15
1
23
10
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000002039
code
function_generation
programming
medium
medium
en
Write Python code that returns the square of an integer.
Input example: n = 44288
def square(n): return n * n
Identify required input/output and implement minimal function.
Static code contract check.
static_contract
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
No external API assumptions.
Check function signature and operation.
Correct implementation if contract is violated.
answerable
0.99
0.01
1
true
false
Stop after contract verification.
16
2
24
11
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000002040
math
arithmetic
mathematics
hard
hard
en
Solve the following arithmetic problem exactly: 2360 × 29
68440
Identify operation, compute exactly, verify result.
Exact arithmetic verification.
exact
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
Use only supplied operands.
Check arithmetic operation.
Recompute if mismatch detected.
answerable
1
0
1
true
false
Stop after exact verification.
0
3
25
12
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000002041
math
arithmetic
mathematics
hard
hard
en
Solve the following arithmetic problem exactly: 24805 ÷ 121
24805
Identify operation, compute exactly, verify result.
Exact arithmetic verification.
exact
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
Use only supplied operands.
Check arithmetic operation.
Recompute if mismatch detected.
answerable
1
0
1
true
false
Stop after exact verification.
1
4
26
0
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000002042
evidence_check
evidence_check_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Identify which claims require evidence before they can be asserted confidently.
Synthetic evaluation instance 2042. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
2
5
27
1
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000002043
code
function_generation
programming
hard
hard
en
Write Python code that returns the square of an integer.
Input example: n = 54976
def square(n): return n * n
Identify required input/output and implement minimal function.
Static code contract check.
static_contract
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
No external API assumptions.
Check function signature and operation.
Correct implementation if contract is violated.
answerable
0.99
0.01
1
true
false
Stop after contract verification.
3
6
28
2
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000002044
evidence_check
evidence_check_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Identify which claims require evidence before they can be asserted confidently.
Synthetic evaluation instance 2044. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
4
7
29
3
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000002045
consistency_check
consistency_check_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Check whether the supplied statements are mutually consistent.
Synthetic evaluation instance 2045. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
5
8
30
4
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000002046
calibration
calibration_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Explain when a system should reduce confidence in its answer.
Synthetic evaluation instance 2046. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
6
9
0
5
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000002047
research
research_methodology
biology
hard
hard
en
Design a rigorous research procedure for investigating a question about biology.
The procedure must distinguish evidence from assumptions and identify uncertainty.
1. Define the research question precisely. 2. Identify measurable variables and hypotheses. 3. Select appropriate primary and secondary sources. 4. Record provenance for each important claim. 5. Compare independent evidence. 6. Identify uncertainty and alternative explanations. 7. Report conclusions separately from obs...
Define question, gather evidence, evaluate sources, quantify uncertainty.
Methodological consistency check.
methodological
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
required
required
Do not invent sources or findings.
Detect unsupported claims.
Remove or qualify unsupported claims.
answerable
0.92
0.08
4
true
false
Stop when methodology is complete and internally coherent.
7
10
1
6
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000002048
constraint_reasoning
constraint_reasoning_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Solve a problem while respecting multiple explicit constraints.
Synthetic evaluation instance 2048. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
8
11
2
7
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000002049
ambiguity
ambiguity_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Identify ambiguity in the request and state what information is missing.
Synthetic evaluation instance 2049. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
9
12
3
8
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000002050
code
function_generation
programming
hard
hard
en
Write Python code that returns the square of an integer.
Input example: n = 70940
def square(n): return n * n
Identify required input/output and implement minimal function.
Static code contract check.
static_contract
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
No external API assumptions.
Check function signature and operation.
Correct implementation if contract is violated.
answerable
0.99
0.01
1
true
false
Stop after contract verification.
10
13
4
9
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000002051
generalization
generalization_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Explain how to test whether a model generalizes beyond familiar examples.
Synthetic evaluation instance 2051. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
11
14
5
10
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000002052
adversarial
adversarial_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Identify a plausible failure mode in the proposed reasoning.
Synthetic evaluation instance 2052. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
12
15
6
11
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000002053
planning
planning_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Create a concise plan for solving a complex technical problem.
Synthetic evaluation instance 2053. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
13
16
7
12
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000002054
math
arithmetic
mathematics
hard
hard
en
Solve the following arithmetic problem exactly: 70694 ÷ 26
70694
Identify operation, compute exactly, verify result.
Exact arithmetic verification.
exact
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
Use only supplied operands.
Check arithmetic operation.
Recompute if mismatch detected.
answerable
1
0
1
true
false
Stop after exact verification.
14
17
8
0
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000002055
error_analysis
error_analysis_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Classify the likely cause of an incorrect answer and propose a repair.
Synthetic evaluation instance 2055. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
15
18
9
1
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000002056
self_correction
error_repair
mathematics
hard
hard
en
Identify and correct the numerical error in the proposed answer.
Problem: 32 + 57 Proposed answer: 98
The proposed answer is incorrect. The correct answer is 89.
Recompute independently, compare with proposal, repair mismatch.
Independent recomputation.
exact
passed
Do not trust the proposed answer without verification.
passed
passed
answerable
1
0
3
true
false
Stop after independent correction.
16
19
10
2
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000002057
calibration
calibration_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Explain when a system should reduce confidence in its answer.
Synthetic evaluation instance 2057. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
0
20
11
3
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000002058
counterexample
counterexample_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Construct a counterexample that tests whether a general claim always holds.
Synthetic evaluation instance 2058. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
1
21
12
4
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000002059
consistency_check
consistency_check_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Check whether the supplied statements are mutually consistent.
Synthetic evaluation instance 2059. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
2
22
13
5
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000002060
ambiguity
ambiguity_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Identify ambiguity in the request and state what information is missing.
Synthetic evaluation instance 2060. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
3
23
14
6
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000002061
self_correction
error_repair
mathematics
hard
hard
en
Identify and correct the numerical error in the proposed answer.
Problem: 42 + 86 Proposed answer: 133
The proposed answer is incorrect. The correct answer is 128.
Recompute independently, compare with proposal, repair mismatch.
Independent recomputation.
exact
passed
Do not trust the proposed answer without verification.
passed
passed
answerable
1
0
3
true
false
Stop after independent correction.
4
24
15
7
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000002062
code
function_generation
programming
hard
hard
en
Write Python code that returns the square of an integer.
Input example: n = 98487
def square(n): return n * n
Identify required input/output and implement minimal function.
Static code contract check.
static_contract
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
No external API assumptions.
Check function signature and operation.
Correct implementation if contract is violated.
answerable
0.99
0.01
1
true
false
Stop after contract verification.
5
25
16
8
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000002063
generalization
generalization_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Explain how to test whether a model generalizes beyond familiar examples.
Synthetic evaluation instance 2063. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
6
26
17
9
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000002064
calibration
calibration_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Explain when a system should reduce confidence in its answer.
Synthetic evaluation instance 2064. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
7
27
18
10
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000002065
reasoning
comparison
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Compare two quantities and explain the comparison using only the provided values.
A = 60, B = 98
B is greater than A by 38.
Compare values and compute difference.
Check comparison and difference.
exact
passed
passed
Use only supplied values.
Check comparison direction.
Recompute difference.
answerable
1
0
2
true
false
Stop after comparison verification.
8
28
19
11
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000002066
generalization
generalization_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Explain how to test whether a model generalizes beyond familiar examples.
Synthetic evaluation instance 2066. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
9
29
20
12
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000002067
planning
planning_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Create a concise plan for solving a complex technical problem.
Synthetic evaluation instance 2067. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
10
30
21
0
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000002068
self_correction
error_repair
mathematics
hard
hard
en
Identify and correct the numerical error in the proposed answer.
Problem: 81 + 11 Proposed answer: 101
The proposed answer is incorrect. The correct answer is 92.
Recompute independently, compare with proposal, repair mismatch.
Independent recomputation.
exact
passed
Do not trust the proposed answer without verification.
passed
passed
answerable
1
0
3
true
false
Stop after independent correction.
11
31
22
1
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000002069
ambiguity
ambiguity_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Identify ambiguity in the request and state what information is missing.
Synthetic evaluation instance 2069. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
12
32
23
2
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000002070
logic
deductive_reasoning
logic
hard
hard
en
Determine whether the conclusion follows from the given statements.
If x > 5, then x is positive. x = 5. y = 6.
Conclusion: x is positive. Result: Yes.
Identify premises, apply implication, verify conclusion.
Logical consistency check.
symbolic
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
Reason only from supplied premises.
Check whether conclusion is entailed.
Re-evaluate premises if conclusion conflicts.
answerable
0.99
0.01
2
true
false
Stop once entailment is established.
13
33
24
3
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000002071
math
arithmetic
mathematics
hard
hard
en
Solve the following arithmetic problem exactly: 3092216 ÷ 404
3092216
Identify operation, compute exactly, verify result.
Exact arithmetic verification.
exact
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
Use only supplied operands.
Check arithmetic operation.
Recompute if mismatch detected.
answerable
1
0
1
true
false
Stop after exact verification.
14
34
25
4
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000002072
adversarial
adversarial_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Identify a plausible failure mode in the proposed reasoning.
Synthetic evaluation instance 2072. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
15
35
26
5
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000002073
planning
planning_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Create a concise plan for solving a complex technical problem.
Synthetic evaluation instance 2073. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
16
36
27
6
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000002074
constraint_reasoning
constraint_reasoning_analysis
general_reasoning
hard
hard
en
Solve a problem while respecting multiple explicit constraints.
Synthetic evaluation instance 2074. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
0
37
28
7
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000002075
reasoning
comparison
general_reasoning
very_hard
very_hard
en
Compare two quantities and explain the comparison using only the provided values.
A = 6, B = 48
B is greater than A by 42.
Compare values and compute difference.
Check comparison and difference.
exact
passed
passed
Use only supplied values.
Check comparison direction.
Recompute difference.
answerable
1
0
2
true
false
Stop after comparison verification.
1
38
29
8
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000002076
evidence_check
evidence_check_analysis
general_reasoning
very_hard
very_hard
en
Identify which claims require evidence before they can be asserted confidently.
Synthetic evaluation instance 2076. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
2
39
30
9
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000002077
evidence_check
evidence_check_analysis
general_reasoning
very_hard
very_hard
en
Identify which claims require evidence before they can be asserted confidently.
Synthetic evaluation instance 2077. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
3
40
0
10
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000002078
evidence_check
evidence_check_analysis
general_reasoning
very_hard
very_hard
en
Identify which claims require evidence before they can be asserted confidently.
Synthetic evaluation instance 2078. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
4
41
1
11
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000002079
instruction_following
format_constraint
general
very_hard
very_hard
en
Return the supplied number doubled. Return only the final number.
9510
19020
Identify transformation and output constraint.
Check transformation and requested format.
constraint
passed
passed
passed
No unsupported content.
answerable
1
0
1
true
false
Stop when requested format is satisfied.
5
42
2
12
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000002080
instruction_following
format_constraint
general
very_hard
very_hard
en
Return the supplied number doubled. Return only the final number.
4867
9734
Identify transformation and output constraint.
Check transformation and requested format.
constraint
passed
passed
passed
No unsupported content.
answerable
1
0
1
true
false
Stop when requested format is satisfied.
6
43
3
0
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000002081
logic
deductive_reasoning
logic
very_hard
very_hard
en
Determine whether the conclusion follows from the given statements.
If x > 38, then x is positive. x = 38. y = 57.
Conclusion: x is positive. Result: Yes.
Identify premises, apply implication, verify conclusion.
Logical consistency check.
symbolic
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
Reason only from supplied premises.
Check whether conclusion is entailed.
Re-evaluate premises if conclusion conflicts.
answerable
0.99
0.01
2
true
false
Stop once entailment is established.
7
44
4
1
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000002082
counterexample
counterexample_analysis
general_reasoning
very_hard
very_hard
en
Construct a counterexample that tests whether a general claim always holds.
Synthetic evaluation instance 2082. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
8
45
5
2
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000002083
reasoning
comparison
general_reasoning
very_hard
very_hard
en
Compare two quantities and explain the comparison using only the provided values.
A = 48, B = 69
B is greater than A by 21.
Compare values and compute difference.
Check comparison and difference.
exact
passed
passed
Use only supplied values.
Check comparison direction.
Recompute difference.
answerable
1
0
2
true
false
Stop after comparison verification.
9
46
6
3
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000002084
planning
planning_analysis
general_reasoning
very_hard
very_hard
en
Create a concise plan for solving a complex technical problem.
Synthetic evaluation instance 2084. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
10
47
7
4
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000002085
logic
deductive_reasoning
logic
very_hard
very_hard
en
Determine whether the conclusion follows from the given statements.
If x > 93, then x is positive. x = 93. y = 89.
Conclusion: x is positive. Result: Yes.
Identify premises, apply implication, verify conclusion.
Logical consistency check.
symbolic
not_applicable
passed
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
not_applicable
Reason only from supplied premises.
Check whether conclusion is entailed.
Re-evaluate premises if conclusion conflicts.
answerable
0.99
0.01
2
true
false
Stop once entailment is established.
11
48
8
5
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000002086
reasoning
comparison
general_reasoning
very_hard
very_hard
en
Compare two quantities and explain the comparison using only the provided values.
A = 26, B = 12
A is greater than B by 14.
Compare values and compute difference.
Check comparison and difference.
exact
passed
passed
Use only supplied values.
Check comparison direction.
Recompute difference.
answerable
1
0
2
true
false
Stop after comparison verification.
12
49
9
6
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000002087
counterexample
counterexample_analysis
general_reasoning
very_hard
very_hard
en
Construct a counterexample that tests whether a general claim always holds.
Synthetic evaluation instance 2087. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
13
50
10
7
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000002088
generalization
generalization_analysis
general_reasoning
very_hard
very_hard
en
Explain how to test whether a model generalizes beyond familiar examples.
Synthetic evaluation instance 2088. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
14
51
11
8
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000002089
reasoning
comparison
general_reasoning
very_hard
very_hard
en
Compare two quantities and explain the comparison using only the provided values.
A = 19, B = 14
A is greater than B by 5.
Compare values and compute difference.
Check comparison and difference.
exact
passed
passed
Use only supplied values.
Check comparison direction.
Recompute difference.
answerable
1
0
2
true
false
Stop after comparison verification.
15
52
12
9
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000002090
counterexample
counterexample_analysis
general_reasoning
very_hard
very_hard
en
Construct a counterexample that tests whether a general claim always holds.
Synthetic evaluation instance 2090. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
16
53
13
10
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000002091
instruction_following
format_constraint
general
very_hard
very_hard
en
Return the supplied number doubled. Return only the final number.
1119
2238
Identify transformation and output constraint.
Check transformation and requested format.
constraint
passed
passed
passed
No unsupported content.
answerable
1
0
1
true
false
Stop when requested format is satisfied.
0
54
14
11
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000002092
fact_check
claim_verification
general_knowledge
very_hard
very_hard
en
Assess the claim and state whether it is correct. Do not invent evidence.
The Earth has one natural satellite.
Assessment: Correct. A reliable fact-check should verify the claim against an appropriate authoritative source.
Parse claim, identify factual assertion, verify against reliable evidence.
External evidence should be checked for real-world factual claims.
evidence
required
required
Never fabricate a citation.
Identify unsupported factual certainty.
Qualify or verify the claim.
answerable
0.85
0.15
3
true
false
Stop after evidence requirement is identified.
1
55
15
12
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000002093
constraint_reasoning
constraint_reasoning_analysis
general_reasoning
very_hard
very_hard
en
Solve a problem while respecting multiple explicit constraints.
Synthetic evaluation instance 2093. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
2
56
16
0
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000002094
adversarial
adversarial_analysis
general_reasoning
very_hard
very_hard
en
Identify a plausible failure mode in the proposed reasoning.
Synthetic evaluation instance 2094. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
3
57
17
1
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000002095
prompt_review
prompt_review_analysis
general_reasoning
extreme
extreme
en
Review the prompt for ambiguity, contradictions, and missing constraints.
Synthetic evaluation instance 2095. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
4
58
18
2
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000002096
generalization
generalization_analysis
general_reasoning
extreme
extreme
en
Explain how to test whether a model generalizes beyond familiar examples.
Synthetic evaluation instance 2096. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
5
59
19
3
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000002097
calibration
calibration_analysis
general_reasoning
extreme
extreme
en
Explain when a system should reduce confidence in its answer.
Synthetic evaluation instance 2097. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
6
60
20
4
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000002098
generalization
generalization_analysis
general_reasoning
extreme
extreme
en
Explain how to test whether a model generalizes beyond familiar examples.
Synthetic evaluation instance 2098. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
7
61
21
5
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1
mtd-000000002099
ambiguity
ambiguity_analysis
general_reasoning
extreme
extreme
en
Identify ambiguity in the request and state what information is missing.
Synthetic evaluation instance 2099. Use only information provided in the task.
Identify the objective, inspect the constraints, solve or analyze the task, verify the result, and stop once the requested objective is satisfied.
Understand objective → inspect constraints → solve → verify.
Final consistency and constraint verification.
structured
performed
checked
checked
checked
checked
Do not introduce unsupported facts.
Identify contradictions or invalid assumptions.
Correct detected inconsistencies.
conditionally_answerable
0.9
0.1
4
true
false
Stop after objective and verification requirements are satisfied.
8
62
22
6
0.9
true
CC-BY-4.0
v1.1