archived
stringclasses
2 values
author
stringlengths
3
20
author_fullname
stringlengths
4
12
body
stringlengths
0
22.5k
comment_type
stringclasses
1 value
controversiality
stringclasses
2 values
created_utc
stringlengths
10
10
edited
stringlengths
4
12
gilded
stringclasses
7 values
id
stringlengths
1
7
link_id
stringlengths
7
10
locked
stringclasses
2 values
name
stringlengths
4
10
parent_id
stringlengths
5
10
permalink
stringlengths
41
91
retrieved_on
stringlengths
10
10
score
stringlengths
1
4
subreddit_id
stringclasses
1 value
subreddit_name_prefixed
stringclasses
1 value
subreddit_type
stringclasses
1 value
total_awards_received
stringclasses
19 values
null
Poddster
null
He was a unique snowflake who was the ONLY person capable of cobbling together a server that serves up hypertext documents over the intranet. THE. ONLY. ONE. THE WEBLANDER. What have you got against him?
null
0
1491384591
False
0
dfutez7
t3_63e1ws
null
null
t1_dftmxv3
null
1493811999
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
josefx
null
From the article: > “And you typically don’t get criminal liability in dual-use technology cases unless there’s a pretty clear intent to promote the criminal use instead of the legitimate ones.”” Not too long ago there was a case with a software developer outright advertising the illegal use case of his software and sold it to people that stated their illegal intent before the transaction. This case could be similar, with the author actively and most importantly knowingly aiding criminals.
null
0
1491384666
1491384950
0
dfutfuv
t3_63jq8w
null
null
t1_dfur1ob
null
1493812012
216
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
HeWhoWas
null
No, the manufacturer is expected to have the capability to remotely disable the guns that have already been manufactured in the event they are used to shoot someone. ^^^/s
null
0
1491384712
False
0
dfutge7
t3_63jq8w
null
null
t1_dfut411
null
1493812019
19
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
Poddster
null
The Queen's pretty into DRM so I imagine she has no qualms about knighting him.
null
0
1491384723
False
0
dfutgiv
t3_63e1ws
null
null
t1_dftr3eh
null
1493812020
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
sm9t8
null
You really need to see it for yourself. Go search the source for new.
null
0
1491384741
False
0
dfutgqk
t3_63jhxx
null
null
t1_dfut3d1
null
1493812023
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
hydrosylator
null
At best, this will see companies open more offices abroad, to ensure they have the best access to talent. Some will just out-source more. The inflated salaries in software indicate that there is an under-supply of applicants. Large heap of salt: I've never hired anybody and don't live in the US, but here in the EU, with a population of over 500 million, we still need to import talent. Funny enough, we're in a better position since Trump got elected, because at that point most developers from outside either place are giving preference to the EU over the US, because it's seen as more stable in terms of rights. I'd be interested to see what employers think about this.
null
0
1491384754
1491385325
0
dfutgw7
t3_63gbjx
null
null
t3_63gbjx
null
1493812025
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
steamruler
null
#This page is easy to read, I like it. ^/s
null
0
1491384941
False
0
dfutj27
t3_63k699
null
null
t3_63k699
null
1493812054
4
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
Poddster
null
> So once the first person was murdered using a gun, the manufacturer was supposed to stop making guns? Guns were originally intended to murder other people on battlefields so I assume they were quite pleased the invention was working.
null
0
1491384954
False
0
dfutj77
t3_63jq8w
null
null
t1_dfut411
null
1493812056
6
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
TwoKittensInABox
null
I would think it's different. Since a company would make these spying programs, sell them to other companies who will just use them on their work computers. So it's a company hiring someone to do work for them using their computers, so they would want to know what that worker is doing on their computer. While this guy is selling the software to people who use it on unsuspecting people and computers that aren't even theirs.
null
0
1491384993
False
0
dfutjpq
t3_63jq8w
null
null
t1_dfur1ts
null
1493812063
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
Tacitus_
null
The Voight-Kampff test?
null
0
1491385106
False
0
dfutl98
t3_63e1ws
null
null
t1_dfu7yd3
null
1493812083
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
davorzdralo
null
So what about knives? Do we arrest makers of those, too?
null
0
1491385181
False
0
dfutm5e
t3_63jq8w
null
null
t1_dfutj77
null
1493812095
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
argv_minus_one
null
SSH?
null
0
1491385188
False
0
dfutm8u
t3_63jq8w
null
null
t1_dfupwaw
null
1493812097
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
InverseX
null
Sure you can, to start with not marketing your product on a crappy skiddy forum.
null
0
1491385213
False
0
dfutmk0
t3_63jq8w
null
null
t1_dfur6hy
null
1493812101
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
Regimardyl
null
I don't know what exactly it was, but there were a bunch of .class files, and it also worked on Linux.
null
0
1491385224
False
0
dfutmow
t3_63e1ws
null
null
t1_dfu69sv
null
1493812102
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
davorzdralo
null
No, it really is. What people do with tools you sell is none of your business. Imagine if we arrested a knife manufacturer because someone got stabbed. It's on the same level of idiocy.
null
1
1491385242
False
0
dfutmwg
t3_63jq8w
null
null
t1_dfuso8k
null
1493812105
0
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
AgainWitTheWhiteVans
null
We should arrest Dell/amd/intel for making computers people use to code the hacks with.
null
1
1491385253
False
0
dfutn13
t3_63jq8w
null
null
t3_63jq8w
null
1493812107
-3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
Regimardyl
null
Well, until recently there was no other way to make a "Copy This Text" button afaik.
null
0
1491385326
False
0
dfutnyh
t3_63e1ws
null
null
t1_dfusjw1
null
1493812120
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
hydrosylator
null
And I assume they're all amazing and nobody anywhere in the world could do a better job than any of them.
null
1
1491385384
False
0
dfutonr
t3_63gbjx
null
null
t1_dfuqaun
null
1493812129
0
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
davorzdralo
null
You do understand that things like built in Windows Remote Desktop access and programs like TeamViewer are RATs?
null
0
1491385396
False
0
dfutot1
t3_63jq8w
null
null
t1_dfupwaw
null
1493812131
8
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
InverseX
null
Intent matters. Zero legitimate users are going to purchase a "remote monitoring tool" from hackforums.net for a company environment.
null
0
1491385434
False
0
dfutpa5
t3_63jq8w
null
null
t1_dfur4v8
null
1493812137
26
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
vetinari
null
It is also name of a village... in Poland (Jarocin County, Greater Poland Voivodeship).
null
0
1491385495
False
0
dfutq05
t3_63ddi5
null
null
t1_dfurgsy
null
1493812146
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
thesbros
null
Hey, at least they're using Flexbox.
null
0
1491385496
False
0
dfutq0e
t3_63jq8w
null
null
t1_dfutbhf
null
1493812146
47
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
BoredPudding
null
That would make Daniel Stenberg the most wanted 'criminal' in history very fast.
null
0
1491385584
False
0
dfutr3n
t3_63jq8w
null
null
t1_dfuq4rx
null
1493812161
23
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
kefeer
null
You mean, Script Writer.
null
0
1491385607
False
0
dfutrd9
t3_63e1ws
null
null
t1_dftwqvv
null
1493812165
9
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
grauenwolf
null
The story hasn't changed since then. And the problems are still relevant today.
null
0
1491385923
False
0
dfutv5s
t3_63k8ep
null
null
t1_dfusyyc
null
1493812216
5
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
circusmeerkat
null
You bet your vertical-aligned ass he would
null
0
1491386019
False
0
dfutwdl
t3_63jq8w
null
null
t1_dfupjm9
null
1493812232
68
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
Raqem
null
It's been said multiple times, but it wasn't until your wording that I wondered what happened to the concept, "Tools don't hack people. People hack people." Sure, the tool helps, as does the gun, but that's a whole different discussion. The real question is why this guy? Because they were hoping it would lead to a bunch of hackers and even though it didn't, the literally poor guy can't defend himself?
null
0
1491386113
False
0
dfutxhu
t3_63jq8w
null
null
t1_dfur4v8
null
1493812248
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
kalekold
null
Tech debt, like real monetary debt, has to be managed. If you think you can ignore it to be 'agile' in the short term, you are going to be in a world of hurt surprisingly quickly. It cannot be ignored.
null
0
1491386123
False
0
dfutxn9
t3_63g8jv
null
null
t3_63g8jv
null
1493812250
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
[deleted]
null
[deleted]
null
0
1491386213
False
0
dfutyqm
t3_63ejyr
null
null
t1_dftq243
null
1493812268
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
OmnomApplesauce
null
I do, I'm using one right now.
null
0
1491386581
False
0
dfuu32y
t3_63jq8w
null
null
t1_dfupwaw
null
1493812327
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
twiggy99999
null
Welcome to the land of the *free*
null
1
1491386621
False
0
dfuu3kp
t3_63jq8w
null
null
t3_63jq8w
null
1493812333
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
[deleted]
null
People get arrested for selling IPTV boxes loaded with software intended to enable media piracy. Intent and marketing definitely play in to this. It will be an interesting case, but it really isn't that simple.
null
0
1491386657
False
0
dfuu3zw
t3_63jq8w
null
null
t1_dfutmwg
null
1493812339
30
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
Kok_Nikol
null
Why does this have so many upvotes and stars on Github??
null
0
1491386733
False
0
dfuu4w9
t3_5lf3g1
null
null
t3_5lf3g1
null
1493812350
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
kyz
null
> Xanadu is conceptually really interesting, as it tries to solve problems that HTML doesn't, but despite existing for 50 years, it never turned into a useable product. That's because it tried to solve a heap of *social* problems with technical solutions. WWW didn't even consider them and Tim Berners-Lee beat them to market despite their 30 year head start. Social problems like "how do you get paid by people reading your page?", "how can someone include your content on their page (transclusion) and you still get paid?" Xanadu's technical answer to that is only people with known identities and bank accounts are permitted to read or write on this medium, and there is centralized monitoring, billing, auditing. Xanadu has to know who wrote what, who read what, who transcluded what, who created derived works from whom. No anonymous publishing. No anonymous browsing. Does not scale. International usage only possible subject to a single jurisdiction's laws. Trying to respect copyrights and authors destroyed Xanadu before it was born. WWW showed that society doesn't crumble if you blatantly ignore copyrights, indeed there's an argument for *reducing* the control copyright holders have over works.
null
0
1491386765
False
0
dfuu5bi
t3_63e1ws
null
null
t1_dfuqx5v
null
1493812356
6
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
alphaatom
null
The discussion over at lobste.rs had someone actually pull the indictment and it seems that he has connections to criminal conspiracy with someone who wrote a keylogger. So the daily beast is misrepresenting the story at least a little bit. Link to discussion: https://lobste.rs/s/ncnsli/fbi_arrests_hacker_who_hacked_no_one
null
0
1491386810
False
0
dfuu5vk
t3_63jq8w
null
null
t3_63jq8w
null
1493812364
444
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
qbxk
null
maybe that's the problem? maybe he only wrote net seal so he could cut off hackers using nanocore in order to demonstrate the whiteness of his hat? maybe he's a whitewash hat?
null
0
1491386921
False
0
dfuu785
t3_63jq8w
null
null
t1_dfur6hy
null
1493812381
5
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
beginner_
null
And the gun industry. Because if the creator of something is liable for how the buyer uses it, then you can just sue the gun industry. Or your knife manufacturer because you cut yourself.
null
0
1491387021
False
0
dfuu8h2
t3_63jq8w
null
null
t1_dfuq4rx
null
1493812399
63
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
twiggy99999
null
Although I completely agree with what you're saying the article states the case is resting on intent rather than the technical capabilities of the software. Sure the tool was probably used on Windows or Linux but is it Microsoft's *intent* that Windows will be used for hacking? Are they on a hackforum saying use Windows to remote access another machine without the end user knowing it? The guy seems genuine enough that he tried everything he could to stop people using it for illegal purposes and shut people down who did but I suppose it all hinges on what the FBI have seen on the forums where he promoted the tool. Have they got posts of PM's of him actively promoting it as a hack tool? Interesting case anyway
null
0
1491387029
1491396703
0
dfuu8kt
t3_63jq8w
null
null
t1_dfur1ob
null
1493812400
36
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
QuerulousPanda
null
> Whenever he saw evidence that a particular buyer was using the product to hack, he’d log in to Net Seal and disable that user’s copy, cutting the hacker off from his infected slaves. > If that's true and his lawyers hammer that home then there shouldn't really be intent they can run with. isn't that actually super, super bad for him though? like, by actively policing the users, doesn't it show that he is aware of the risk and of the possibility of malicious intent, and by extension doesn't it make him liable for missing out on someone using the software in a bad way? if he kept hands-off couldn't he basically just say he's not responsible for people misusing stuff. wouldn't it be the same as if Smith and Wesson made their own police force to make sure no one was killing people with their guns, which would then completely open them up to liability, rather than being basically immune as they are now?
null
0
1491387093
False
0
dfuu9cr
t3_63jq8w
null
null
t1_dfus3y4
null
1493812410
6
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
twiggy99999
null
You're missing the point, the knife manufacture isn't on a murder forum saying hey use our knife its really good for murder
null
0
1491387184
False
0
dfuuahi
t3_63jq8w
null
null
t1_dfutmwg
null
1493812425
61
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
twiggy99999
null
> So once the first person was murdered using a gun, the manufacturer was supposed to stop making guns? The gun manufacture wasn't actively promoting the gun can be used for illegal purposes. This case is all about intent rather than the technical capabilities of the software
null
0
1491387289
False
0
dfuubpq
t3_63jq8w
null
null
t1_dfut411
null
1493812442
11
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
HashCatchEm
null
Crazy times we're living in; lets sue crow bar manufacturing companies!!
null
0
1491387452
False
0
dfuuds7
t3_63jq8w
null
null
t3_63jq8w
null
1493812469
-2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
hydrosylator
null
Come on gang, it's nice that you have Go talking to MongoDB at last, but stop being hypersensitive and get a job, for Pete's sake.
null
0
1491387548
False
0
dfuuezn
t3_63gbjx
null
null
t1_dfutd11
null
1493812485
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
bendurham441
null
Only real hackers use CSS.
null
0
1491387552
False
0
dfuuf1x
t3_63jq8w
null
null
t1_dfutbhf
null
1493812486
67
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
[deleted]
null
It's more like a gun manufacturer only advertising to people with prior felonies, low income criminals, crack dealers, etc. And then spying on them and waiting for them to commit a crime, and then saying "no no no little boy!" And taking away the gun afterwards... It's like playing God with computer security. The guy got arrested for a GOOD REASON, don't let these stories scare you into thinking the fbi can see your visual studio projects...
null
0
1491387720
False
0
dfuuh53
t3_63jq8w
null
null
t1_dfut411
null
1493812514
6
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
davorzdralo
null
No, *you're* missing the point. Even if someone made an advertisement campaign that was all about how good their knives are at killing people, that would still be 100% legal.
null
0
1491387736
False
0
dfuuhcg
t3_63jq8w
null
null
t1_dfuuahi
null
1493812517
-31
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
DunDunDunDuuun
null
It's not though, they have no evidence to support the author providing active or knowing aid.
null
0
1491387829
False
0
dfuuikg
t3_63jq8w
null
null
t1_dfutfuv
null
1493812533
31
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
IGI111
null
It's more like if S&W could remotely disable the guns of people who use them in gun free zones. You can't blame the guy for stopping what was obviously illegal, it's actually what he should have done. In that precise case he could have perfectly denied looking at what users do with his tool, but the fact that he complied with the law whenever he saw a violation is an argument in his favor, not against him.
null
0
1491387836
False
0
dfuuinw
t3_63jq8w
null
null
t1_dfuu9cr
null
1493812535
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
xesenix
null
Knife enables you cut someone throat in its stock form...
null
0
1491387939
False
0
dfuujyy
t3_63jq8w
null
null
t1_dfuso8k
null
1493812552
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
grumbel
null
> That's because it tried to solve a heap of social problems with technical solutions. It also tried to attack technical issues like the constant breakage of hyperlinks you get in HTML or the inability to quote a subsection of another HTML page. > Trying to respect copyrights and authors destroyed Xanadu before it was born. WWW showed that society doesn't crumble if you blatantly ignore copyrights, indeed there's an argument for reducing the control copyright holders have over works. True, but at the same time the idea wasn't all that wrong and parts of the Web are slowly going in the same direction. Youtube owns a pretty large part of the video distribution on the Web precisely because they respect copyright and are able to pay authors. The lone non-centralized video hosters do exist, but they are small fish compared to Youtube.
null
0
1491387974
False
0
dfuukeu
t3_63e1ws
null
null
t1_dfuu5bi
null
1493812557
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
actLikeApidgeon
null
Very reminiscent of the story of PGP and Zimmerman investigation https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phil_Zimmermann albeit on a more moronic level
null
0
1491387979
False
0
dfuukh5
t3_63jq8w
null
null
t3_63jq8w
null
1493812558
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
HelperBot_
null
Non-Mobile link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phil_Zimmermann *** ^HelperBot ^v1.1 ^/r/HelperBot_ ^I ^am ^a ^bot. ^Please ^message ^/u/swim1929 ^with ^any ^feedback ^and/or ^hate. ^Counter: ^52200
null
0
1491387981
False
0
dfuuki3
t3_63jq8w
null
null
t1_dfuukh5
null
1493812559
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
Vlir
null
He did post in on HF which is predominately used by skids... IMO there's clear criminal intent but no criminal act
null
0
1491387982
1491388874
0
dfuuki8
t3_63jq8w
null
null
t1_dfuuikg
null
1493812559
6
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
mallardtheduck
null
How do you know what evidence the FBI do or don't have?
null
0
1491388073
False
0
dfuulq3
t3_63jq8w
null
null
t1_dfuuikg
null
1493812575
155
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
DunDunDunDuuun
null
I mean, the article covered this. He'd been posting there innocently for a long time before, and he actively acted against those using it to hack,going so far as to remove features and add identifying marks the software.
null
0
1491388125
False
0
dfuumfy
t3_63jq8w
null
null
t1_dfuuki8
null
1493812585
22
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
Cilph
null
Neither was this guy. He just posted it on the wrong forum.
null
1
1491388239
False
0
dfuunuq
t3_63jq8w
null
null
t1_dfuubpq
null
1493812604
-2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
Cilph
null
Okay, so now that we've confirmed guns are designed to kill people, we should ban guns!
null
0
1491388264
False
0
dfuuo5e
t3_63jq8w
null
null
t1_dfutj77
null
1493812608
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
reficulucifer
null
Ironic that an ad I accidentally clicked on from this website took me to a mobile malware site.
null
0
1491388280
False
0
dfuuod2
t3_63jq8w
null
null
t3_63jq8w
null
1493812611
4
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
enzlbtyn
null
I get that, but why didn't he design it without this requirement?
null
0
1491388301
False
0
dfuuon6
t3_63jhxx
null
null
t1_dfutgqk
null
1493812614
4
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
Vlir
null
Not saying he should be prosecuted but I don't buy his story that he didn't intend it to be used in such a way. If he didn't want 1337ers to use it he wouldn't have posted there. Sure there are some non criminals that browse HF but the majority skid around.
null
0
1491388602
False
0
dfuusls
t3_63jq8w
null
null
t1_dfuumfy
null
1493812668
11
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
DunDunDunDuuun
null
They have a pretty detailed indictment, which leans on his participation on the forum.
null
0
1491388611
False
0
dfuuspu
t3_63jq8w
null
null
t1_dfuulq3
null
1493812669
52
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
four_three_three
null
We really should, though.
null
1
1491388636
False
0
dfuut23
t3_63jq8w
null
null
t1_dfuuo5e
null
1493812674
-1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
Teekoo
null
My issue with create-react-app is that it forces you to a specific directory structure and it installs the wepack.config file under node_modules somewhere. If you want to add more functionality to wepack config file (like preloading fonts properly), you need to basically create a new config file from scratch. Still it definitely is the fastest way to start with React. It just hides a lot of the 'magic' you eventually need to configure yourself to make things work the way you want to.
null
0
1491388653
False
0
dfuut9z
t3_63kcyy
null
null
t3_63kcyy
null
1493812677
4
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
rawb0t
null
Literally the only reason he did that was to claim that it's legal. He marketed it as malware. He was just hoping that disabling a few licenses would protect him. Just like those people that put "this is for educational use only" on their malware.
null
0
1491388701
False
0
dfuutwa
t3_63jq8w
null
null
t1_dfur6hy
null
1493812686
13
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
Shaper_pmp
null
Reading this article was a real rollercoaster of emotions about this case. > He built a piece of software. That tool was pirated and abused by hackers. Now the feds want him to pay for the computer crooks’ crimes. WTF? Disgusting! How could this possibly happen? > The court filings don’t detail why the government is so certain that Huddleston wanted to help hackers, but the indictment mentions eight times the name of the website where Huddleston announced and supported NanoCore: HackForums.net... This isn’t “hacking” in the innocent “innovative coding” sense of the word. The participants in these particular sub forums are largely discussing computer intrusion, some academically, others practically... computer crime newbies and amateurs building their very first botnet appear to be commonplace. One recent thread posed the question, “How would you spread malware through iframe tags?” and drew knowing advice: serve malicious Java on a fake Minecraft landing page; lure victims with a bogus ad for a recent movie. Waaaait a minute. RA tools are dual-use, but he's literally advertising it on a forum frequented primarily by sketchy fuckers actively intent on breaking into people's shit, and he knows it. Maybe this indictment is legit after all... > Huddleston found himself routinely admonishing people not to use his software for crime. “NanoCore does not permit illegal use,” he wrote in one post. In another, “NanoCore is NOT malware. It is intended to be used legitimately and I don’t want to see words like ‘slave’ and ‘infect.’” Huddleston backed his words with action. Whenever he saw evidence that a particular buyer was using the product to hack, he’d log in to Net Seal and disable that user’s copy, cutting the hacker off from his infected slaves... He was fighting an uphill battle. Tutorials on how to covertly infect a victim’s machine appeared on YouTube by the thousands; Huddleston responded by quietly changed NanoCore’s control panel to display the user’s license ID, so he could revoke that copy when he saw it in a video. His righteous attitude started to irk some of NanoCore’s fans. “What the hell do you expect? You’re selling a Remote Administration Tool on a hacking forum,” one wrote in 2015. “That’s like selling guns in a warzone but making a policy, ‘You’re not allowed to use these guns for dangerous purposes only target shooting.”’ Still more gripes came when Huddleston removed the tool’s ability to steal passwords and log keystrokes. “You can’t do any blackhat activities with it,” one user complained. “No one who buys a RAT wants one with the main features taken out.” Ok, so it's a pretty fucking stupid community to advertise a RAT on if you *don't* intend for anyone to use it for black-hat purposes, but not only was he claiming it was for legitimate purposes only - he was actively trying to prevent anyone from misusing it. Stupid mistake, then, but trying to make good and making his intentions clear... > But he was weary of all the drama, coupled with the pressure of running a small business on his own, Huddleston began divesting himself from NanoCore in early 2015. First he handed off the business end to another HackForum member, while continuing to develop the code as an “advisor” in exchange for 60 percent of every sale. Ooops - now he's still working on it and taking a cut from it, but loses any ability to police or dissuade anyone from using it for illegal purposes. Better hope the new owner is really a good guy, or by receiving profits and contributing code he could end up getting implicated in knowingly facilitating criminal activity. Ultimately this does seem to be a non-event - particularly if the FBI pored over his machines for months and couldn't find any evidence of collusion with criminal users - though to be fair the guy himself did make several stupid mistakes that left him open to this kind of overreaching prosecution. But let's be clear here - it *is* overreach, and while it certainly made sense for the FBI to investigate the guy there's not a shred of evidence presented in this article that he deserves charges. **Edit:** The plot thickens - lots of comments on this page indicating the narrative presented by the article is woefully biased and incomplete. Kind of hard to sell a tool with a built-in DDOS botnet controller as a legitimate RAT, or one that intentionally hides its installation and runtime process... and there are claims the owner only started clamping down on black-hat users *after* one of his colleagues got busted for knowingly facilitating them. Hmmm...
null
0
1491388718
1491394128
0
dfuuu40
t3_63jq8w
null
null
t1_dfur1ob
null
1493812689
71
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
funciton
null
Is selling crowbars a grey area too?
null
0
1491388795
False
0
dfuuv2p
t3_63jq8w
null
null
t1_dfupixj
null
1493812702
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
QuerulousPanda
null
that's the way it feels like it should be, but i still have a strong suspicion that this would be a situation where the legal realities aren't as nice and simple as they 'feel'. for his sake i hope it does work out well though!
null
0
1491388874
False
0
dfuuw39
t3_63jq8w
null
null
t1_dfuuinw
null
1493812716
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
rawb0t
null
Except that Dell/AMD/Intel aren't marketing their computers towards hacking unknowing victims. edit: You guys can downvote me all you want but I'll bet you'd think differently if you were one of the victims here. Intent matters and if you guys want to peddle this "oh he's just an innocent developer!" bullshit, then go for it. Fact is that he marketed it towards hacking other people. This wasn't some "watch your employees" software. This was software being used to steal passwords and other private information from victims, use their computers for DDOS. Perverts used the "disable webcam light" to watch their victims.
null
0
1491388884
1491389905
0
dfuuw8c
t3_63jq8w
null
null
t1_dfutn13
null
1493812718
18
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
EatATaco
null
If the intent of it was for people to hack things, it wasn't just a unfortunate side effect, is that punishable? And is that the case with this program? These are the questions at hand. Your rant, while it is no surprise that it is popular on reddit, is the result of black and white thinking and ignores that we live in a very nuanced world.
null
0
1491388890
False
0
dfuuwbh
t3_63jq8w
null
null
t1_dfur1ob
null
1493812719
7
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
Admiral_Mackbar
null
Are you sure? That doesn't sound very legal
null
0
1491388915
False
0
dfuuwn7
t3_63jq8w
null
null
t1_dfuuhcg
null
1493812723
30
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
rawb0t
null
Why? Are they marketing their tools to criminals for criminal purposes?
null
0
1491388920
False
0
dfuuwpj
t3_63jq8w
null
null
t1_dfuuds7
null
1493812724
7
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
rydan
null
Wait? You mean piracy actually does hurt people?
null
0
1491389032
False
0
dfuuy5z
t3_63jq8w
null
null
t3_63jq8w
null
1493812744
-2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
shevegen
null
The FBI terrorist organization is so annoying.
null
1
1491389057
False
0
dfuuyhi
t3_63jq8w
null
null
t3_63jq8w
null
1493812748
-2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
shevegen
null
The "logic" applied by FBI standards is pure idiocy. People who work for this organization are criminal anti-social parasites.
null
1
1491389082
False
0
dfuuyu6
t3_63jq8w
null
null
t1_dfur1ob
null
1493812753
-2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
rawb0t
null
Yeah if they develop malware and market it towards script kiddies trying to hack unknowing victims.
null
0
1491389096
False
0
dfuuz0x
t3_63jq8w
null
null
t1_dfuq4rx
null
1493812755
8
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
shevegen
null
And?
null
0
1491389099
False
0
dfuuz2a
t3_63jq8w
null
null
t1_dfutfuv
null
1493812755
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
shevegen
null
How do YOU know? You can put whatever file on any computer at will. So come again and explain how the "evidence" by the FBI (a) exists and (b) is real.
null
1
1491389127
False
0
dfuuzez
t3_63jq8w
null
null
t1_dfuulq3
null
1493812760
-8
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
DunDunDunDuuun
null
Yeah, it certainly wasn't smart.
null
0
1491389182
False
0
dfuv05h
t3_63jq8w
null
null
t1_dfuusls
null
1493812770
4
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
shevegen
null
Let's be honest - the military industry in the USA is above all standards.
null
0
1491389206
False
0
dfuv0hr
t3_63jq8w
null
null
t1_dfuu8h2
null
1493812776
23
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
DoListening
null
Is there any better tooling for Elm than what was shown in the video? Seems like moving from TypeScript would be a serious downgrade in this regard - all the refactoring had to be done manually (even if the compiler showed the errors), there was no proper autocomplete, errors were not immediately highlighted in the editor, apparently there are no source maps, which makes debugging very complicated (https://github.com/elm-lang/elm-compiler/issues/1273), haven't seen the common navigation features (Ctrl+click, Find usages), etc. I like the idea of not having to shoehorn immutable structures into a language not designed with them in mind (JS), but these things kinda put me off.
null
0
1491389308
1491390571
0
dfuv1u2
t3_63kjfv
null
null
t3_63kjfv
null
1493812793
10
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
shevegen
null
And that changes what exactly? That reminds me of the gun industry saying that it is not guns killing people - it's people killing people. Or Nazi workers saying they kill people because they were under orders. Or the USA raiding another countries because they have a fancy PowerPoint presentation showing weapons of mass distruction (still looking for them evidently).
null
1
1491389360
False
0
dfuv2j4
t3_63jq8w
null
null
t1_dfuuw8c
null
1493812802
-5
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
shevegen
null
This is why you should need to use adblocking. It should be a human right to not get pestered with propaganda like ads.
null
1
1491389393
False
0
dfuv2zi
t3_63jq8w
null
null
t1_dfuuod2
null
1493812808
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
shevegen
null
Can I use CATs against those RATs?
null
0
1491389407
False
0
dfuv35t
t3_63jq8w
null
null
t1_dfutot1
null
1493812811
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
mirhagk
null
You are right. I was mixing things up, my bad.
null
0
1491389456
False
0
dfuv3uj
t3_63adw4
null
null
t1_dfunj8s
null
1493812820
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
shevegen
null
Agreed.
null
0
1491389463
False
0
dfuv3xb
t3_63eo3w
null
null
t1_dftmoje
null
1493812822
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
steamruler
null
This was great.
null
0
1491389508
False
0
dfuv4kn
t3_63jpev
null
null
t3_63jpev
null
1493812831
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
shevegen
null
From a syntax point of view, it **is** an improvement. For other parts, who knows. I actually feel that the biggest mistake is to use a wrapper language over another (suckier) language in the first place.
null
0
1491389528
False
0
dfuv4v1
t3_63eo3w
null
null
t1_dftwf7x
null
1493812834
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
rawb0t
null
Guns aren't marketed to teenagers for the purpose of murder. And let's not act like governments and spy agencies are on the same level as some guy selling malware to teenagers for the express intent of hacking unknowing victims.
null
0
1491389533
False
0
dfuv4xq
t3_63jq8w
null
null
t1_dfuv2j4
null
1493812835
6
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
underhunter
null
Unfortunately not. The government has shown time and time again it treats "cyber" much differently than any other industry/field.
null
0
1491389567
False
0
dfuv5fj
t3_63jq8w
null
null
t1_dfuu8h2
null
1493812842
34
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
Cynical__asshole
null
> The intended audience is those who won't be sarcastic in their appreciation. People who like this sort of thing will find this the sort of thing they like. ^^^(sorry)
null
0
1491389580
False
0
dfuv5lr
t3_63gixf
null
null
t1_dfuq7rd
null
1493812844
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
ancapnerd
null
how does the boot polish taste?
null
0
1491389722
False
0
dfuv7k7
t3_63jq8w
null
null
t1_dfuulq3
null
1493812870
-7
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
AgainWitTheWhiteVans
null
its not malware its software for being able to access a computer from another computer. The argument here is if there is something malicious used for crime it needs to be built on some foundations. The question is how far down that tree you can prosecute people. Do we prosecute the guy that wrote vim/emacs, c or assembler, maybe we go after Babage himself as its pretty much all his fault.
null
1
1491389745
False
0
dfuv7v0
t3_63jq8w
null
null
t1_dfuv4xq
null
1493812874
0
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
Qatalife
null
He intentionally posted it on a hacking forum.
null
0
1491389790
False
0
dfuv8gx
t3_63jq8w
null
null
t1_dfuunuq
null
1493812882
9
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
Abomonog
null
There is a parallel analogy in the article. > “It’s like saying that if someone buys a handgun and uses it to rob a liquor store, that the handgun manufacturer is complicit.” The American "justice" system does do this and I am not surprised to see this kind of cherry picking among remote network administration apps, with this guy going to jail and Microsoft not being bothered at all about writing them.
null
0
1491389907
False
0
dfuva3b
t3_63jq8w
null
null
t1_dfur1ob
null
1493812905
-4
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
cass1o
null
Sure if you strip away all nuance and context.
null
0
1491390018
False
0
dfuvbli
t3_63jq8w
null
null
t1_dfuq4rx
null
1493812925
16
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
rawb0t
null
No. It's malware through and through. TeamViewer is software for being able to access a computer from another computer. TeamViewer doesn't hide its process. Nanocore does. TeamViewer is something you can see right from your system tray. Nanocore isn't. It's all about intent. vim/emacs, c/assembler -- these things aren't marketed with the intent of hacking people unknowingly. They have actual use far outside of DDOSing networks and stealing passwords without any sort of notification to the victim.
null
0
1491390067
False
0
dfuvcax
t3_63jq8w
null
null
t1_dfuv7v0
null
1493812935
8
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
flargenhargen
null
>But when he opened the door, he was met by about two dozen serious-looking men and women, some in bulletproof vests, holding handguns at the ready, one shouldering an assault rifle, another carrying a battering ram. welcome to america. They arrested 2 teenagers for stealing a car in my town. They had 12 cop cars, about 15 cops, all with full swat gear and guns drawn as they surrounded the house. for 2 fucking teenagers. the kids got terrified and locked the door in panic until their mom came home and sent them outside. Amazing the cops didn't bust down the door guns blazing and shoot them both for "resisting" One cop showing up, and saying, "we know it was you, please come down town" would've been just fine. police militarization is nuts in this country.
null
0
1491390168
False
0
dfuvdpv
t3_63jq8w
null
null
t3_63jq8w
null
1493812953
17
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
Merinovich
null
This does sound a bit fishy, anybody got a source on the indictment? Really begs to question how much of said Skype conversation they got, if that is the case. For those who didn't follow the link, it mentions that the indictment names his connection with Shames much more (he's the one they mention got convicted not so long ago), and that the DOJ/FBI has proof of Skype conversations between Shames and Huddelstone where they discuss stuff(?). > Comment by tptacek: > >I pulled the indictment from PACER. The story is oversimplifying the case. > >The indictment is far more concerned with Huddleston’s affiliation with Zachary Shames, who was convicted (apparently dead-to-rights) for selling a keylogger called “Limitless”. The indictment mentions Limitless more than it mentions NanoCore. Shames wasn’t very smart: the DOJ has records of him providing tech support to users who were clearly using his keylogger to harm people. > >Huddleston has two big problems. The first is that he sold licensing software to Shames for the Limitless keylogger. The second is that the DOJ apparently has Huddleston and Shames in a Skype group together talking about this stuff. > >The Beast article snarks about the indictment mentioning HackForums repeatedly. But the Beast article doesn’t think it’s important for you to know about the HackForums Skype group Huddleston and Shames shared; in fact, Shames himself gets only a tiny sliver of the article, despite being the fulcrum of the indictment. > >RAT software theoretically has legitimate uses. But, obviously, we all know that most RAT software isn’t legitimate. NanoCore sure wasn’t. It has a DDoS botnet tab, for Christ’s sake. Huddleston’s attempts to position it as legitimate software are about as compelling as the “no copyright claimed” comments on a Youtube video. > >But having said that: it’s unlikely Huddleston would be in the amount of trouble he is in had he simply written a malicious RAT. His problems are his connections to a criminal conspiracy that got busted.
null
0
1491390262
False
0
dfuvf1w
t3_63jq8w
null
null
t1_dfuu5vk
null
1493812971
142
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
burgundus
null
Go's default http.Client does not set a timeout, so your request could be stuck in some malperformed HTTP request forever. Even worse for in case of a broken API that could hijack several of your routines. Suggested reading: [Don't use Go's default HTTP client in production](https://medium.com/@nate510/don-t-use-go-s-default-http-client-4804cb19f779)
null
0
1491390286
False
0
dfuvfe9
t3_63kqtu
null
null
t3_63kqtu
null
1493812975
11
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
jpakkane
null
`make -j` has a very specific meaning. It spawns an unlimited number of compilation processes. This is also known as a fork bomb. You would think that `make -j` would mean "use as many processes as there are cores on this machine". But it doesn't. No, I have no idea why either.
null
0
1491390304
False
0
dfuvfne
t3_63dch7
null
null
t1_dfu5vqf
null
1493812979
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null