archived
stringclasses
2 values
author
stringlengths
3
20
author_fullname
stringlengths
4
12
body
stringlengths
0
22.5k
comment_type
stringclasses
1 value
controversiality
stringclasses
2 values
created_utc
stringlengths
10
10
edited
stringlengths
4
12
gilded
stringclasses
7 values
id
stringlengths
1
7
link_id
stringlengths
7
10
locked
stringclasses
2 values
name
stringlengths
4
10
parent_id
stringlengths
5
10
permalink
stringlengths
41
91
retrieved_on
stringlengths
10
10
score
stringlengths
1
4
subreddit_id
stringclasses
1 value
subreddit_name_prefixed
stringclasses
1 value
subreddit_type
stringclasses
1 value
total_awards_received
stringclasses
19 values
null
paul_h
null
Yeah was light on "why". I used to work at a company selling consulting services (ThoughtWorks), and then more recently (Snr. Director of Engineering / Chief Scientist) at a hedge fund administrator, so I saw both sides of the fence. We outsourced a web-app to a small team in China on a **time and material** basis, because a) all our devs were busy on valuable revenue earning dev work, and b) this new web app would be profitable soon after going live, and c) the app wasn't high intellectual property. If we delayed the project's start we were also delaying the profit. Therefore there's a clear return on investment (ROI) aspect to it all. The vendor worked 12 hours out of phase with their dev liaisons in-house. Once a week we'd organize a 7/8 PM/AM GoogleHangout just keep faces and names associated. Both sides enjoyed the experience - and we made it sane with [Mountebank](http://www.mbtest.org/) meaning the China team didn't have to do VPN at all to 'services'.
null
0
1491232099
False
0
dfrtuq3
t3_6355ui
null
null
t3_6355ui
null
1493757819
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
cruyff8
null
.... Gotta leave it all behind and face malloc
null
0
1491232302
False
0
dfru0xw
t3_6350ax
null
null
t1_dfrp2vl
null
1493757931
20
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
HotlLava
null
So you can verify the correctness of the algorithm you pulled from stackoverflow within a few minutes, but don't trust your own implementation even after code review?
null
0
1491232392
False
0
dfru3qd
t3_62xwba
null
null
t1_dfqrohk
null
1493757993
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
fl4v1
null
I also try to keep track of articles automatically with Pocket. There is a nice IFTTT applet that you can find here: https://ifttt.com/applets/75381p-hacker-news-to-pocket
null
0
1491232393
False
0
dfru3rz
t3_6377gk
null
null
t3_6377gk
null
1493757993
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
i_tried_butt_fuck_it
null
I'll take whatever I get :p
null
0
1491232404
False
0
dfru43v
t3_6344ep
null
null
t1_dfrlax2
null
1493757997
4
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
BenjiSponge
null
No pictures?
null
0
1491232415
False
0
dfru4gh
t3_636nj2
null
null
t3_636nj2
null
1493758003
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
salgat
null
Who said I couldn't understand the algorithm I found through online research? I'm saying that I trust it more if it both looks correct to me and is open source and open to code review by the entire world, in addition to review by me and my team.
null
0
1491232464
False
0
dfru5za
t3_62xwba
null
null
t1_dfru3qd
null
1493758023
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
jose_von_dreiter
null
Stop changing stuff, dickwads! No one (that matters) asked you to!
null
0
1491232495
False
0
dfru6zj
t3_6350ax
null
null
t3_6350ax
null
1493758036
-28
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
DonnyTheWalrus
null
The idea of time/motion has been the most important for me. (I'm a classically trained pianist and a self-taught programmer.) Both programming and music require you to read static symbols on a page/screen and hear/analyze the movement that they represent. In both, there is a structure that only appears when the thing is put in motion. So simulating that motion in your head becomes a vital part of the job. Being able to focus on solitary notes, scanning forwards and backwards, chunking notes into larger abstractions (scales, chords, etc). It's quite similar to programming for me.
null
0
1491232582
False
0
dfru9lm
t3_633o3y
null
null
t3_633o3y
null
1493758071
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
moomaka
null
Ruby has fairly full support for rationals.
null
0
1491232624
False
0
dfruavr
t3_636db5
null
null
t1_dfrpq8u
null
1493758088
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
mikaelstaldal
null
There are (at least) two aspects of "doing music", you can play something already composed (possibly by someone else), or you can compose something new. I guess that playing something already composed is predominately technical, while composing something new is predominately creative. Programming is (most of the time) more like composing something new, and therefore predominately creative.
null
0
1491232657
False
0
dfrubu4
t3_633o3y
null
null
t3_633o3y
null
1493758101
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
evaned
null
Mama, oooo ooo ooo oooo, I don't want to fault; I sometimes wish I'd never been forked at all
null
0
1491232755
False
0
dfrueo1
t3_6350ax
null
null
t1_dfru0xw
null
1493758139
18
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
papers_
null
TIL `someBoolean++` is a thing
null
0
1491232794
False
0
dfrufq7
t3_6350ax
null
null
t3_6350ax
null
1493758153
71
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
JMBourguet
null
In a two digits FP format: 9.7 + 9.9 = 19 (rounded down) or 20 (rounded up), divide by 2 than gives 9.5 or 10. > (Incidentally, I suppose then you're also opposed to all fixed-width integers, because that's true for them as well?) Well strange behaviors in presence of overflow does not bother me. Automatic adjustment of the scale to avoid overflow is what makes Floating Point different of Fixed Point.
null
0
1491232837
False
0
dfruh07
t3_635ggh
null
null
t1_dfrt6qe
null
1493758170
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
irishsultan
null
In this case it's obviously because this will return true if any character matches (and it's a poor dev that wouldn't see this quite quickly), but presumably you wanted to point out a flaw even if the correct algorithm was used? (If you had a different flaw in mind I think I can see what you mean, but I probably wouldn't think of it without the existence of a flaw being pointed out).
null
0
1491232940
False
0
dfrujp7
t3_6344ep
null
null
t1_dfrtcg6
null
1493758206
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
HotlLava
null
Boost.Graph is basically made with the design goal of running it over custom data structures. However, the interface is opaque enough that you'd want to need a more challenging algorithm (max flow, tsp, layouting, etc.) before using it actually saves you time and/or headache.
null
0
1491232977
False
0
dfrukyb
t3_62xwba
null
null
t1_dfqzgo4
null
1493758223
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
AnAirMagic
null
> One of my managers Do you have eight different ~~bosses~~ managers?
null
0
1491233067
False
0
dfrun8b
t3_6344ep
null
null
t1_dfrfaeh
null
1493758253
17
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
Xaeroxe
null
I mean no one said you had to use C++17, C++14 will still be there for you to use.
null
0
1491233095
False
0
dfruoa5
t3_6350ax
null
null
t1_dfru6zj
null
1493758268
15
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
Xaeroxe
null
Assuming you're not being sarcastic, the version number is based on the year it was published.
null
0
1491233131
False
0
dfrupc1
t3_6350ax
null
null
t1_dfrrgql
null
1493758281
21
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
staticassert
null
> In this case it's obviously because this will return true if any character matches (and it's a poor dev that wouldn't see this quite quickly), but presumably you wanted to point out a flaw even if the correct algorithm was used? lmao no I literally just wrote it with inverted booleans :) that would have been caught in any basic test, the new version... less likely. I'll edit.
null
0
1491233369
False
0
dfruwka
t3_6344ep
null
null
t1_dfrujp7
null
1493758381
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
arbitrarycivilian
null
You mean in Rust?
null
0
1491233414
False
0
dfruxwz
t3_631p99
null
null
t1_dfrtn86
null
1493758400
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
Dentosal
null
The difference is that with UI/UX nearly anybody can give you constructive feedback, but with security you need a professional to do so. Of course having a professional UX designer helps a lot, but without a professional pentester the security testing is quite hard.
null
0
1491233465
False
0
dfruzie
t3_6344ep
null
null
t1_dfrr4xf
null
1493758420
24
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
sisyphus
null
I agree but does anyone have faith that Flutter for the long term at this point? The irony of their state of the art vm is most of its time is spent compiling dart code to run in a different vm.
null
0
1491233540
False
0
dfrv1s3
t3_632937
null
null
t1_dfrcjax
null
1493758452
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
sisyphus
null
Are you using angel with angular 2 as the frontend and sharing models between them? Angular 2 Dart looks cool but until they have a full material design story I'd still rather have normal angular and the pre-built widgets.
null
0
1491233608
False
0
dfrv3xy
t3_632937
null
null
t1_dfrjax6
null
1493758481
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
mmstick
null
> Besides having to set them up in declarations and so forth? There isn't any 'setting them up' in 'declarations'. > Which is basically the same thing as manual memory management Manual memory management means having to manually manage memory. That's not something you do in Rust unless you are writing a custom memory allocator. > except that the compiler will call free() for you and refuse the program if/when it can't. That's not how the compiler works.
null
0
1491233626
False
0
dfrv4ie
t3_62wye0
null
null
t1_dfrc7c2
null
1493758488
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
FG_Regulus
null
Sure. They're hideous and make code incredibly difficult to read. The semantics could use some work themselves, but the syntax is God awful. There are so many other things I can go to off on he top of my head, but this works because it's a new and highly praised language written up by a very smart community.
null
0
1491233709
False
0
dfrv74r
t3_631p99
null
null
t1_dfruxwz
null
1493758523
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
Dentosal
null
Well now you know, start a blog. Do you really need those upvotes?
null
0
1491233854
False
0
dfrvbng
t3_62ul90
null
null
t1_dfpu26m
null
1493758584
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
OriginalPostSearcher
null
X-Post referenced from [/r/vscode](http://np.reddit.com/r/vscode) by /u/mlewand [Tutorial on how to debug Karma using Visual Studio Code](http://np.reddit.com/r/vscode/comments/637eqa/tutorial_on_how_to_debug_karma_using_visual/) ***** ^^I ^^am ^^a ^^bot. ^^I ^^delete ^^my ^^negative ^^comments. ^^[Contact](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=OriginalPostSearcher) ^^| ^^[Code](https://github.com/papernotes/Reddit-OriginalPostSearcher) ^^| ^^[FAQ](https://github.com/papernotes/Reddit-OriginalPostSearcher#faq)
null
0
1491233863
False
0
dfrvbwm
t3_637gvp
null
null
t3_637gvp
null
1493758587
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
salgat
null
I think he means that it gets compiled with both c++98 and c++17 compilers depending on the target or user, but his case is pretty exceptional and I'm not a big fan of *that* much bending backwards to support legacy code.
null
0
1491233930
False
0
dfrvdzn
t3_6350ax
null
null
t1_dfrpyf0
null
1493758615
6
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
k1tt3hk4t
null
That "has include" thing looks nice for soft dependencies. (AFAIK the only way to do it before was checking for the header guard-- could be wrong though, as I mainly use C)
null
0
1491234015
False
0
dfrvgob
t3_6350ax
null
null
t3_6350ax
null
1493758651
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
jms_nh
null
>This is not an official Google product. Ummm... so the github.com/google account posts projects that are not official Google products?
null
0
1491234110
False
0
dfrvjmb
t3_637fi2
null
null
t3_637fi2
null
1493758690
6
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
sirin3
null
Perhaps it is useful in templates where n can be a boolean or a number
null
0
1491234111
False
0
dfrvjob
t3_6350ax
null
null
t1_dfrohib
null
1493758691
5
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
Jarrrp
null
Ikr. How do you add true to true? Or true to false? WHO IS ADDING BOOLEANS?!
null
0
1491234152
False
0
dfrvky0
t3_6350ax
null
null
t1_dfrufq7
null
1493758707
46
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
Jarrrp
null
I get this strange niggle in the back of my mind that my code is like spaghetti, then realise there's likely no better way of writing it.
null
0
1491234218
False
0
dfrvn1p
t3_6350ax
null
null
t1_dfrsnjo
null
1493758735
9
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
punking_funk
null
It's actually the other way around: each version of C++ makes it easier to write code and simultaneously harder to read.
null
0
1491234287
False
0
dfrvpb0
t3_6350ax
null
null
t1_dfrsnjo
null
1493758767
25
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
kevkevverson
null
I broke CI on a system once by checking in a comment. I thought it's only a comment it can't possibly break anything. The comment had a trigraph in it, the compiler gave a warning that trigraphs were not fully supported and we had warnings-as-errors.
null
0
1491234307
False
0
dfrvpxx
t3_6350ax
null
null
t1_dfrjjoz
null
1493758775
20
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
punking_funk
null
> Changes to common_type >Because it’s not a new standard if we didn’t make changes to common_type…
null
0
1491234357
False
0
dfrvri6
t3_6350ax
null
null
t3_6350ax
null
1493758795
6
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
sirin3
null
They will change it back after meeting the aliens and needing support for their characters in 2137.
null
0
1491234444
False
0
dfrvuac
t3_6350ax
null
null
t1_dfrkxha
null
1493758832
5
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
rmxz
null
> Its like UI design. Every dev thinks they can do it, when in reality they don't know shit. It's a much worse situation than UI design. Even a "horrible" UI design (say, craigslist.org, or /bin/csh, or whatever-you-hate-more-vi-or-emacs) is probably still great for **some** people. A horrible security situation isn't good for anyone.
null
0
1491234583
False
0
dfrvyiy
t3_6344ep
null
null
t1_dfrey2u
null
1493758890
11
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
OneWingedShark
null
>> Opening up your source is also not a valid security procedure, though. Having competent people review your code is, but having closed source does not prevent you from doing this, nor does opening your source automatically gain you this. >> >> >> >> This is why open source is orthogonal to security. > > > > Not really though, more eyes on the code really does help, again though along with the fair point above like you said competent code review helps but open sourcing the code does help. The 'help' you perceive from opening up your source is entirely incidental -- it's the equivalent to increasing the sampling-rate for testing purity saying that it's increasing quality, it simply isn't: it's merely increasing the resolution and giving you a better picture of what the quality actually is. To [directly] increase actual security you could do something like use [SPARK](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SPARK_%28programming_language%29) to prove the property of your code that it does not violate the security model at hand -- you can do that on something that is closed-source, or open-source.
null
0
1491234625
False
0
dfrvzr7
t3_6344ep
null
null
t1_dfrt2kf
null
1493758906
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
RolandBuendia
null
I agree 100%. At my college, informatics security is a degree in itself, not just a course on the software development program.
null
0
1491234683
False
0
dfrw1h5
t3_6344ep
null
null
t1_dfrey2u
null
1493758929
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
rmxz
null
Even better [check out the source code to this more realistic terrain](http://paulbourke.net/exhibition/scc4/final/) The program to make [this image](http://paulbourke.net/exhibition/scc4/final/pdotou.png) was **under 256 bytes**. Here's [a longer version of the source code, with comments, whitespace and long variable names](http://paulbourke.net/exhibition/scc4/final/l_pdotou.pov). And a [few more examples here](http://paulbourke.net/exhibition/scc3/final/).
null
0
1491234889
1491235183
0
dfrw7k6
t3_630cgb
null
null
t3_630cgb
null
1493759016
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
shawabawa
null
I'm guessing branch prediction? There's lots of other things it could be based on the compiler though. A 'smart' enough compiler could figure out to break out of the loop after it sets is_valid to False
null
0
1491235053
False
0
dfrwcsf
t3_6344ep
null
null
t1_dfrtcg6
null
1493759092
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
evaned
null
> In a two digits FP format: 9.7 + 9.9 = 19 (rounded down) or 20 (rounded up), divide by 2 than gives 9.5 or 10. Couldn't the same thing occur with binary fp though? If not, why? My intuition doesn't like the dissymmetry there, but I can't produce a counterexample.
null
0
1491235225
False
0
dfrwiax
t3_635ggh
null
null
t1_dfruh07
null
1493759174
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
coopermidnight
null
This video gave me the smallest glint of hope for WPF not getting abandoned.
null
0
1491235317
False
0
dfrwl2s
t3_636jjs
null
null
t3_636jjs
null
1493759214
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
Zeroto
null
> A horrible security situation isn't good for anyone. Nah. A horrible security situation is good for the hackers and data-sellers. ;)
null
0
1491235372
False
0
dfrwmsb
t3_6344ep
null
null
t1_dfrvyiy
null
1493759237
4
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
[deleted]
null
[deleted]
null
0
1491235418
1491513667
0
dfrwo9a
t3_634f0e
null
null
t1_dfrk3ds
null
1493759256
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
Eirenarch
null
You have no plans to remove it... for now :)
null
0
1491235527
False
0
dfrwro9
t3_62n5mx
null
null
t1_dfrrc5c
null
1493759303
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
Fordiman
null
I'm just a uint, nobody signs me
null
0
1491235572
False
0
dfrwt3e
t3_6350ax
null
null
t1_dfrueo1
null
1493759322
18
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
[deleted]
null
[deleted]
null
0
1491235601
False
0
dfrwu0a
t3_6350ax
null
null
t1_dfro4tt
null
1493759335
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
[deleted]
null
[deleted]
null
0
1491235632
False
0
dfrwuwt
t3_6350ax
null
null
t1_dfro4tt
null
1493759354
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
silveryRain
null
...or use weak refs as needed instead. Or avoid cycles altogether.
null
0
1491235635
False
0
dfrwv0o
t3_62wye0
null
null
t1_dfrc17k
null
1493759357
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
c0d3g33k
null
> smaller things with each one having a clear point The Unix philosophy in a nutshell. Seems to be a meta-pattern.
null
0
1491235688
False
0
dfrwwoi
t3_635ser
null
null
t1_dfrjk9x
null
1493759385
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
emoprairiedog
null
I'm not the author, I just didn't bump into this article here and thought it deserved some discussion.
null
0
1491235739
False
0
dfrwy9f
t3_637qqu
null
null
t3_637qqu
null
1493759408
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
hutthuttindabutt
null
Good. Unfortunately the advanced degree requirement is easily sidestepped by countries like India that have a "university" on every street corner that is little more than a boot camp churning out "coders" who can barely write something that will compile.
null
0
1491235852
False
0
dfrx1p0
t3_637m7q
null
null
t3_637m7q
null
1493759455
85
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
genti_watchman
null
The H1B application window opens (and effectively closes) today, by the way. This means this is an attempt to ensure that no H1Bs are awarded to any computer programmers, since none of the applications would have the extra information that they asked for.
null
0
1491235956
False
0
dfrx4t1
t3_637m7q
null
null
t3_637m7q
null
1493759503
631
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
c0shea
null
> The developer did not know to hash or salt the passwords before storing them in the database. This is not surprising though. Universities are not doing their part to teach security. Exactly. The professors that I had in classes where we learned to interact with a database in our program were all using string concatenation instead of parameterized queries against the db. We were being _taught_ (and paying for it!) to do it wrong.
null
0
1491236007
False
0
dfrx68b
t3_6344ep
null
null
t3_6344ep
null
1493759523
7
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
aullik
null
Am i missing something very trivial? I mean this will obviously fail if the hashes have a different length. but hashes should not have a different length and this is python and in python we just assume that every input is fine. Otherwise we would just use a typed language.
null
0
1491236017
False
0
dfrx6gx
t3_6344ep
null
null
t1_dfruwka
null
1493759526
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
ericpi
null
> Maybe that it is allowed to be packed into a bit field I thought that it was *required to be* packed into a bit field?
null
0
1491236021
False
0
dfrx6kk
t3_6350ax
null
null
t1_dfrrfkw
null
1493759527
6
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
OneWingedShark
null
> Do you know why that's bad? Because it starts with the assumption that the password is valid. (`is_valid = True`) The proper way would be something like this: Function Matching_Password( User_Input, Password : String ) return Boolean is begin -- Ensure both strings start at the same index, -- Ensure both are of the same length, -- Ensure both contain the same values. Return (User_Input'First = Password'First) and then (User_Input'Length = Password'Length) and then (for all index in User_Input'Range => User_Input(Index) = Password(Index) ); end Matching_Password; You could even attach constraints to the type to ensure properties of passwords: Type Password is String with Dynamic_Predicate => Password'Length in Positive -- No zero-length password. and then -- Passwords are alphanumeric + plus underscore (for all ch of Password => ch in 'a'..'z'|'A'..'Z'|'0'..'9'|'_') ;
null
0
1491236118
False
0
dfrx9m4
t3_6344ep
null
null
t1_dfrtcg6
null
1493759588
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
renatoathaydes
null
I find it interesting that software developers' wages in the US are far higher than in other countries, even countries where most other jobs have higher salaries than the US. This change will make the gap increase, I would imagine, which may start moving business away from the US! Countries like the UK, Sweden, Germany and Australia are highly competitive and have great programmers who are happy to work for lower salaries than their US counterparts (and with a better quality of life, some would say). I wonder if this will cause a boom in tech jobs for them.
null
0
1491236249
False
0
dfrxd8n
t3_637m7q
null
null
t1_dfrx4t1
null
1493759642
327
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
bobthecimmerian
null
I think the author skips over the fact that many companies doing some really interesting stuff don't allow remote work. If I want to work on Google Borg, self-driving cars, Software Defined Networking, X-Prize, Amazon Elastic Beanstalk, Warhammer: Dawn of War 3, the next point release of the Swift programming language, etc... etc... I'm going to have to move near one of the offices of those companies. As it is, I work full time from home on projects that are technically challenging but that won't set the world on fire. I'd love for my software legacy to be part of something grand, but I'll have to settle for the personal legacy of giving my kids a good standard of living by taking 80% of a Silicon Valley engineer salary in a place with 60% of the Silicon Valley cost of living.
null
0
1491236262
False
0
dfrxdju
t3_62zrgk
null
null
t3_62zrgk
null
1493759646
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
silveryRain
null
Closest thing I know of is [Clang's C++ support page](http://clang.llvm.org/cxx_status.html). Be sure to click the "List of features" expanders for full listings.
null
0
1491236303
False
0
dfrxf0i
t3_6350ax
null
null
t1_dfrmcxf
null
1493759666
5
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
Solokiller
null
All great changes, looking forward to using this. What's the word on when compilers will have support for C++17 (mostly) integrated?
null
0
1491236318
False
0
dfrxffj
t3_6350ax
null
null
t3_6350ax
null
1493759672
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
TheAnimus
null
I had 3 people at one point who thought they were in charge of me. Turns out it was someone else who was technically my reporting manager. Used to drive them mad when I told person B that person A had instructed me to have my team work on something else. Most of the time they were too busy fighting with themselves to actually get in the way of our work. One really didn't like me putting his title as Triumvirate in emails, but luckily the other two could at least take a joke.
null
0
1491236390
False
0
dfrxh6p
t3_6344ep
null
null
t1_dfrun8b
null
1493759696
29
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
richraid21
null
Awesome. It was abused for too long.
null
0
1491236399
False
0
dfrxhd1
t3_637m7q
null
null
t3_637m7q
null
1493759698
78
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
zerexim
null
What about Software Engineers? :))
null
0
1491236664
False
0
dfrxov0
t3_637m7q
null
null
t3_637m7q
null
1493759817
15
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
TheEternal21
null
> I wonder if this will cause a boom in tech jobs for them. It won't - because of significantly higher taxes in those countries (someone has to pay for 'free' healthcare).
null
0
1491236694
False
0
dfrxpqn
t3_637m7q
null
null
t1_dfrxd8n
null
1493759832
-51
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
genti_watchman
null
So does the United States. It has the University of Phoenix, and it has Stanford. India has those roadside institutions, and it has the Indian Institutes of Technology. The interesting difference is that the Indian governments get to certify some of them as valid. The US doesn't, and so creates the ability to legitimize, and turn into big *government-subsidized* big businesses, abominations like UoP. Care to tar the entire US with one brush supplied by the UoP? Because that's what you just did for India.
null
0
1491236721
False
0
dfrxqip
t3_637m7q
null
null
t1_dfrx1p0
null
1493759854
242
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
Draghi
null
I'll *go* ahead and take that as a hint to *go* somewhere else. Perhaps I'll *go* back to /r/programmingcirclejerk. Atleast *go* is respected there.
null
0
1491236811
False
0
dfrxt30
t3_62yl50
null
null
t1_dfrk5pl
null
1493759893
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
Simi510
null
Here is the Source of the Article https://www.uscis.gov/sites/default/files/files/nativedocuments/PM-6002-0142-H-1BComputerRelatedPositionsRecission.pdf
null
0
1491236937
False
0
dfrxwpr
t3_637m7q
null
null
t3_637m7q
null
1493759942
29
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
silveryRain
null
That will most likely require him to change a lot of code, in which case he might as well go for replacing it all with unique/shared_ptr.
null
0
1491236937
False
0
dfrxwqa
t3_6350ax
null
null
t1_dfrrh0z
null
1493759942
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
destinoverde
null
Have you ever been in Venezuela?
null
0
1491236966
False
0
dfrxxcf
t3_631p99
null
null
t1_dfrlrp6
null
1493759952
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
Simi510
null
>Companies applying for H-1B visas for computer programming positions will have to **submit additional evidence showing that the jobs are complex or specialized and require professional degrees**. Entry-level wages attached to these visa applications will also get more scrutiny. The change appears to target outsourcing companies, who typically employ lower-paid, lower-level computer workers. Translation, if you are doing a job that has specialized skills you can still come
null
0
1491236973
False
0
dfrxxiy
t3_637m7q
null
null
t1_dfrxov0
null
1493759955
48
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
Thaxll
null
Battlefield runs @60hz. http://wccftech.com/battlefield-1-feature-60hz-default-tick-rate-gets-details-melee-system-destruction/
null
0
1491236995
False
0
dfrxybe
t3_62yl50
null
null
t1_dfq5il1
null
1493759966
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
Solon1
null
This begs the question is if the Indian candidates are that bad, why hire them to begin with? But one benefit of the rule change, is it should prevent anymore Indians from becoming victims of US terrorists.
null
1
1491237004
False
0
dfrxyjr
t3_637m7q
null
null
t1_dfrx1p0
null
1493759970
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
darknavi
null
It really depends. A lot of codebase will typedef STL containers to their own name, so it may just be chasing a typedef and implementing their own class.
null
0
1491237012
False
0
dfrxysv
t3_6350ax
null
null
t1_dfrxwqa
null
1493759975
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
ReefOctopus
null
This is great! This program has been abused like crazy, and it depresses wages for those of us who aren't at companies like Google.
null
0
1491237048
False
0
dfrxzvj
t3_637m7q
null
null
t3_637m7q
null
1493759991
173
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
JMBourguet
null
It can't happen: 2 floor((a+b)/2)/2 = floor((a+b)/2)
null
0
1491237084
False
0
dfry0ra
t3_635ggh
null
null
t1_dfrwiax
null
1493760002
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
silveryRain
null
I agree. Some of the new stuff is kinda nice, but it feels like a pretty small improvement overall.
null
0
1491237124
False
0
dfry254
t3_6350ax
null
null
t1_dfrkjd9
null
1493760030
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
NativeCoder
null
Nooooo they removed trigrapghs. 😛
null
0
1491237142
False
0
dfry2mw
t3_6350ax
null
null
t3_6350ax
null
1493760037
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
CRImier
null
Well, the example is Python, so I'm thinking this should be something else. However, I don't have a clue.
null
0
1491237156
False
0
dfry32k
t3_6344ep
null
null
t1_dfrwcsf
null
1493760042
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
_georgesim_
null
> Entry-level wages attached to these visa applications will also get more scrutiny. The change appears to target outsourcing companies, who typically employ lower-paid, lower-level computer workers. Good. It sounds like this would affect the Tata's and the Infosys, but not the Google's and Facebook's who can actually pay a high-paying salary for high-skilled individuals.
null
0
1491237162
False
0
dfry385
t3_637m7q
null
null
t3_637m7q
null
1493760044
1007
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
[deleted]
null
Yours is a reality I don't recognize. Windows is the only platform that has a terrible driver model in general. BSODs are NOT user friendly.
null
0
1491237168
False
0
dfry3er
t3_62mp7p
null
null
t1_dfroprl
null
1493760047
0
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
[deleted]
null
[deleted]
null
0
1491237196
False
0
dfry481
t3_6350ax
null
null
t1_dfru6zj
null
1493760057
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
srekel
null
In case anyone's wondering who Our Machinery is - it's the new project of the guys behind Bitsquid/Stingray. Some of you may have stumbled upon that blog, especially if you're into game development: http://bitsquid.blogspot.se/
null
0
1491237212
False
0
dfry4li
t3_637uh3
null
null
t3_637uh3
null
1493760065
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
genti_watchman
null
This guy gets it
null
0
1491237362
False
0
dfry984
t3_637m7q
null
null
t1_dfrxyjr
null
1493760134
-4
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
Isvara
null
> figuring it out on my own isn't just going to magically happen Nothing magically happens. You have to be motivated and put in the effort to learn things. What's stopping you when you have Google and Amazon at your disposal?
null
0
1491237374
False
0
dfry9kh
t3_6344ep
null
null
t1_dfrqe86
null
1493760139
4
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
[deleted]
null
[deleted]
null
0
1491237471
False
0
dfrycgz
t3_6350ax
null
null
t1_dfrvky0
null
1493760177
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
DJDarkViper
null
Wait, people were incrementing booleans? That was at one point valid syntax?
null
0
1491237482
False
0
dfrycsq
t3_6350ax
null
null
t3_6350ax
null
1493760181
12
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
OopsIredditAgain
null
Yeah, a chump who writes code so that others can understand it straight away. You fool.
null
0
1491237500
False
0
dfrydc6
t3_6350ax
null
null
t1_dfrtfq3
null
1493760189
20
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
iconoclaus
null
i'm under the impression that the average wage of programmers in the US is insanely high - multiple times that of similar positions in europe in many cases.
null
0
1491237511
1491237985
0
dfrydnj
t3_637m7q
null
null
t1_dfrxzvj
null
1493760195
98
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
setuid_w00t
null
If you're a company, why do you care whether you are paying BigInsuranceCo or the government (via higher taxes) to cover the cost of healthcare for employees?
null
0
1491237515
False
0
dfrydre
t3_637m7q
null
null
t1_dfrxpqn
null
1493760197
6
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
[deleted]
null
Why would they?
null
0
1491237517
False
0
dfrydtp
t3_6344ep
null
null
t3_6344ep
null
1493760198
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
aeam
null
No
null
0
1491237563
False
0
dfryf1y
t3_637c28
null
null
t3_637c28
null
1493760215
0
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
OneWingedShark
null
> Security is a process, not a magic powder you add at the end, as Bruce Schneier explains. Security is neither an add-on nor process -- it is a property. > Must be incorporated from the beginning and you have to do "defensive programming" and not trust anything you have not checked. This, however, is absolutely correct: you cannot "add on" security, and (because it is a property) you should be able to both model it and enforce the model.
null
0
1491237569
False
0
dfryf8g
t3_6344ep
null
null
t1_dfrgtku
null
1493760217
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
tmp14
null
Empty password lets you in?
null
0
1491237656
False
0
dfryhyt
t3_6344ep
null
null
t1_dfrtcg6
null
1493760255
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
genti_watchman
null
Before anyone cites "abuse" and "our jobs", remember this: this is an ad-hoc change of rules, *deliberately ambiguous, and deliberately published today*. What it will allow, and result in, is back-door readjustment of the lottery stack of applications, so that people on the in get their applications approved. Does anyone know who the biggest lobbyist in DC is today? Google. If anything, a Google may now pay *everybody* LESS because of simple supply & demand: their supply has increased. And without Infosys, your Iowa-based farming company won't have technical support anymore, because you don't have talent willing to come there, nor the salary level to pay them to. This is what happens when ad-hoc rules are passed, folks. **This is not a win for jingoistic commenters, or any of us in this forum.**
null
1
1491237692
False
0
dfryiyg
t3_637m7q
null
null
t3_637m7q
null
1493760270
40
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
silveryRain
null
cppreference.com is going to need a more dynamic way to highlight differences between the various versions of the standard...
null
0
1491237707
False
0
dfryjgu
t3_6350ax
null
null
t3_6350ax
null
1493760277
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
iconoclaus
null
this will really hurt US schools since coming to the US for an undergraduate CS degree has lost its greatest worth - employment in the US. and without foreign candidates, those programs will shrink.
null
1
1491237713
False
0
dfryjn2
t3_637m7q
null
null
t1_dfrx1p0
null
1493760279
-4
t5_2fwo
null
null
null