archived stringclasses 2 values | author stringlengths 3 20 | author_fullname stringlengths 4 12 ⌀ | body stringlengths 0 22.5k | comment_type stringclasses 1 value | controversiality stringclasses 2 values | created_utc stringlengths 10 10 | edited stringlengths 4 12 | gilded stringclasses 7 values | id stringlengths 1 7 | link_id stringlengths 7 10 | locked stringclasses 2 values | name stringlengths 4 10 ⌀ | parent_id stringlengths 5 10 | permalink stringlengths 41 91 ⌀ | retrieved_on stringlengths 10 10 ⌀ | score stringlengths 1 4 | subreddit_id stringclasses 1 value | subreddit_name_prefixed stringclasses 1 value | subreddit_type stringclasses 1 value | total_awards_received stringclasses 19 values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
null | 4vfz2ps34j | null | Shots folded | null | 0 | 1491178145 | False | 0 | dfqyhd2 | t3_62yl50 | null | null | t1_dfq5t3b | null | 1493740791 | 12 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
null | lusion | null | Okay, so I looked at the repo and it is all C code, so what is the joke? Lily was never ever written in Rust?
Man this joke was evil. It was hard to make out that it was a joke, because it wasn't quite crazy enough. Like his arguments seemed kind of sensible, and they made me really sad about the future of Rust. | null | 0 | 1491178150 | False | 0 | dfqyhj4 | t3_62wye0 | null | null | t3_62wye0 | null | 1493740793 | 2 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
null | dafuqm88 | null | Just encrypting the network data does nothing since the client has to encrypt/decrypt it for the game to write/read it, so in that case just find the functions responsible for encryption/decryption and manipulate the data in memory beforehand. | null | 0 | 1491178219 | 1491179967 | 0 | dfqyjiw | t3_62yl50 | null | null | t1_dfqxq97 | null | 1493740820 | 6 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
null | vansterdam_city | null | I wish I understood more about why WebRTC can use UDP in the browser but raw UDP cannot be there? Is it just that nobody else has done this or is there some browser sandbox reason and this is the only protocol all browser makers agreed to that involves UDP?
WebRTC proves my point about opinionated standards: it breaks down beyond the use case. Why couldn't the WebRTC designers agree on a standard that provided UDP building blocks for other standards?
It's just so freaking short sighted. But then again, I'm not a web developer. Coming from backend services land, it makes me sad that a simple network protocol that is decades old cannot be done in a modern browser as a basic building block. | null | 0 | 1491178295 | False | 0 | dfqylo9 | t3_62z7p7 | null | null | t1_dfqnhg3 | null | 1493740848 | 3 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
null | agonnaz | null | 1. No example programs in the website
2. No example code in the readme of the github repo
3. All the demos are youtube videos
4. A Q&A as a youtube video, so if I have a question, I can't possibly search for it to see if it's answered
5. No discussion of the syntax or paradigms in text form
6. No API or syntax documentation
You make me do a lot of work just to see a complete example program. If you want somebody to use your language, you should make it a little easier to figure out why they might want to use your language in the first place. Programmers want to see code, or anything at all, without having to skip around a video. Programmers want to be able to search through documentation, not have to skip around a video.
Look at any other new language's websites, like [Wren](http://wren.io/), [Rust](https://www.rust-lang.org/en-US/), or [D](https://dlang.org/).
Notice something? Every single one shows code samples up front, has accessible links to documentation, has actual programmer-relevant reasons to use the languages, have links to text-format FAQs, and gives you an easy way to quickly get the language and start playing with it immediately.
Odin could be the best thing in the world, but from the website (and the GitHub repo) I have no clean vector to access example code, to download the compiler or interpreter, to know what its actual paradigms are (so I might know why I'd ever want to use it in the first place), to even look at the standard library or API documentation, etc.
Sure, have introduction and tutorial videos, but those should not be the only way to become familiar with your programming language. For one, it is absolutely useless to the deaf, and prohibitive to non-English speakers who would otherwise be able to get by with machine translation or by slowly reading English. For another, I can not copy and paste example code to see how it works. I understand it's very alpha as a language, but so is Wren, and Wren has a very pleasant introduction to a brand-new not-ready-for-prod language. | null | 0 | 1491178333 | False | 0 | dfqymqq | t3_631p99 | null | null | t3_631p99 | null | 1493740863 | 161 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
null | codebje | null | I don't think that would qualify as safe, if what you mean is the context of use determines the type. If I had an untagged union containing a mutable reference to a structure, and an int, could I safely mutate the referenced structure? | null | 0 | 1491178372 | False | 0 | dfqyns9 | t3_62wye0 | null | null | t1_dfqj5s3 | null | 1493740877 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
null | BarMeister | null | 30Hz client/server model, just like Dota 2.
Sauce: quick search on LoL's sub. | null | 0 | 1491178548 | False | 0 | dfqysrs | t3_62yl50 | null | null | t1_dfqm51j | null | 1493740944 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
null | MarcusOy | null | Are you familiar with web sockets at all? | null | 0 | 1491178557 | False | 0 | dfqyt1g | t3_62yl50 | null | null | t1_dfq7gx0 | null | 1493740948 | 2 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
null | MINIMAN10001 | null | The reason why raw UDP in the browser isn't allowed is a sandbox and security issue. If you connect to a server and they control UDP they can just tell you to join a DDOS targeting someone.
However why are stacks mandatory when a wrapper around UDP would be sufficient? No idea. | null | 0 | 1491178635 | False | 0 | dfqyvcm | t3_62z7p7 | null | null | t1_dfqylo9 | null | 1493740979 | 6 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
null | LousyBeggar | null | You can do deques with arrays | null | 0 | 1491178804 | False | 0 | dfqz0dm | t3_62wye0 | null | null | t1_dfpx44f | null | 1493741045 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
null | vansterdam_city | null | I kind of figured that was the reason.
Want to write a new standard with me? ;) Seriously, it has to be easier than that massive list of acronyms you gave me up there, lol | null | 0 | 1491178954 | False | 0 | dfqz4ke | t3_62z7p7 | null | null | t1_dfqyvcm | null | 1493741101 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
null | arbitrarycivilian | null | Functional programming is not declarative programming (which doesn't even really exist). | null | 0 | 1491179032 | False | 0 | dfqz6t7 | t3_62yl50 | null | null | t1_dfqkzig | null | 1493741131 | -1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
null | arbitrarycivilian | null | > People tend to shop for languages by syntax.
But they shouldn't. Syntax is overrated | null | 0 | 1491179102 | False | 0 | dfqz8ym | t3_631p99 | null | null | t1_dfqnbuv | null | 1493741162 | -21 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
null | progfu | null | I don't have that much experience with boost (mostly just with boost::filesystem), but in the case of graphs/trees often times you already have an existing data structure that might be a graph/tree implicitly.
I'm not sure if boost can be used to, for example, run DFS on a custom data structure?
| null | 0 | 1491179367 | False | 0 | dfqzgo4 | t3_62xwba | null | null | t1_dfqqbav | null | 1493741265 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
null | Fyoucon | null | All of that is ofc awesome and needed at some point, but not only is the language alpha, it's pretty much a single person operation at this point. That makes it kinda hard to get all that when you have to work on the language + other obligations (job, school or what else).
Edit: I am not the author | null | 0 | 1491179376 | 1491226810 | 0 | dfqzgx7 | t3_631p99 | null | null | t1_dfqymqq | null | 1493741268 | -23 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
null | hotoatmeal | null | knowing how to use it != knowing how to implement it | null | 0 | 1491179406 | False | 0 | dfqzhqs | t3_62xwba | null | null | t1_dfqp1w4 | null | 1493741279 | 3 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
null | nomnommish | null | Why does it have to be either/or? If anything, if you are good at data structures and algorithms, it shows you took the pains to understand how things really work behind the hood, and why certain decisions were taken.
There is no earthly reason to presume someone who would be good at data structures would not be good at debugging and troubleshooting. If anything, by demonstrating they have understood data structures, they have already demonstrated strong analytical ability and would make good debuggers (assuming they put their mind to it, but that applies to anyone).
And the entire reason someone took the pains to truly understand data structures and algorithms is because they wanted to understand "the right way of solving a given problem". Which means they would be much more likely to have the same attitude and mindset when trying to solve any problem. | null | 0 | 1491179663 | False | 0 | dfqzp5x | t3_62xwba | null | null | t1_dfqufxw | null | 1493741378 | 2 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
null | loonyphoenix | null | It's very easy to make a mistake while benchmarking. If it's not something you have lota of experience with, you can get nonsense results and come to nonsense conclusions.
Most people don't know all the ins and outs of benchmarking in a particular language, but have use for benchmarking to evaluate things. If there is a tool that has proven itself, you can be more or less sure of the results. If you try to do it youraelf, even if you get the corrclect result, no one knows if it's correct unless somebody carefully reviews the methodology, which is extra work no one wants to do. | null | 0 | 1491179779 | False | 0 | dfqzsbl | t3_62vict | null | null | t1_dfpiiia | null | 1493741421 | 2 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
null | hawleyal | null | I mean, it's not that common. Stop being so condescending. A one-liner exploit is very rare. It is all beside the point. Reading the value of a session ID is generally a pretty safe operation. | null | 0 | 1491180148 | False | 0 | dfr02o6 | t3_62ul90 | null | null | t1_dfqmmca | null | 1493741558 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
null | lithium | null | > But having a compiler error for returning a pointer to a variable on the stack in a function still seems like the better thing to do.
`-Wreturn-stack-address` will bitch about this and it's enabled by default. And you're definitely compiling with warnings as errors, right? ;)
| null | 0 | 1491180438 | False | 0 | dfr0b5j | t3_62wye0 | null | null | t1_dfqppdj | null | 1493741673 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
null | [deleted] | null | [deleted] | null | 0 | 1491180557 | False | 0 | dfr0emn | t3_630cgb | null | null | t3_630cgb | null | 1493741721 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
null | MINIMAN10001 | null | SCTP is used to congestion control, DTLS is encryption, ICE/STUN/TURN are for NAT punchthrough that makes it so people don't have to port forward, UDP is of course the little wrapper around IP that contains the packets and data.
While each of them other than UDP/IP has its uses all of them have no reason to be mandatory other than DTLS. | null | 0 | 1491180631 | False | 0 | dfr0gwj | t3_62z7p7 | null | null | t1_dfqz4ke | null | 1493741751 | 3 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
null | tso | null | Supposedly an Amiga 1000 was sitting happy controlling the HVAC of some school or other. | null | 0 | 1491180713 | False | 0 | dfr0jxl | t3_62sqe6 | null | null | t1_dfpyku1 | null | 1493741792 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
null | davidk01 | null | We do build planes. | null | 0 | 1491180857 | False | 0 | dfr0ofn | t3_62wye0 | null | null | t1_dfpr0ia | null | 1493741852 | -1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
null | thexerdo | null | That is a very unpopular opinion. | null | 0 | 1491180861 | False | 0 | dfr0oll | t3_630ysh | null | null | t1_dfqr9rd | null | 1493741854 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
null | [deleted] | null | [removed] | null | 0 | 1491180942 | False | 0 | dfr0qyv | t3_62yy8b | null | null | t1_dfq3mky | null | 1493741886 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
null | Pulse207 | null | I'm so glad I read to the bottom of this. | null | 0 | 1491181141 | False | 0 | dfr0wj1 | t3_62yl50 | null | null | t1_dfqsg0t | null | 1493741961 | 4 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
null | chrisracer24 | null | RemindMe! 12 hours | null | 0 | 1491181202 | False | 0 | dfr0y8r | t3_62yl50 | null | null | t3_62yl50 | null | 1493741983 | 0 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
null | tkannelid | null | Marketing is more important than having a language implemented. People can begin to get interested and even give feedback when you have marketing. Once you have a marketing story, you have a concrete, articuable focus for the language.
A sample program is the most basic form of marketing you can do.
I wrote [a tiny LaTeX-like language](http://git.ikeran.org:3000/dhasenan/subtex), and I spent half an hour writing a README that markets it. I'm not asking other people to use it, but if someone stumbles on it, I don't want to drive them away because I refuse to tell them what it's about or how to use it. | null | 0 | 1491181247 | False | 0 | dfr0zhi | t3_631p99 | null | null | t1_dfqzgx7 | null | 1493742000 | 2 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
null | Creativator | null | Reframed question: why are the most expensive cities the place where developers are in greatest demand? | null | 0 | 1491181361 | False | 0 | dfr12nh | t3_62zrgk | null | null | t1_dfq940u | null | 1493742042 | 6 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
null | oridb | null | First glance, I see no mention of pattern rules. They would make this incredibly verbose to use. I don't see how I would be able to factor out the rules into an include file to turn my makefiles into just a list of targets and inputs.
For reference, one of my typical makefiles looks like:
BIN=my-binary
OBJ=food.o bar.o baz.o
PCPKGS=pkgconfig-pkk
include config.mk
include mk/c.mk | null | 0 | 1491181370 | 1491181658 | 0 | dfr12y0 | t3_62zk1i | null | null | t3_62zk1i | null | 1493742046 | 2 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
null | agonnaz | null | It's really not. That's like saying that the flavor of your food is overrated. It's the entire way that you use the language. Syntax can be very important. | null | 0 | 1491181370 | False | 0 | dfr12y2 | t3_631p99 | null | null | t1_dfqz8ym | null | 1493742046 | 17 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
null | vansterdam_city | null | Cool, thanks for clearing that up.
I don't have much insight to the web standards community. How likely is it that a DTLS + UDP + IP offering could make it as a browser standard? What would that look like to practically get implemented?
I can see how UDP flooding to arbitrary endpoints would be a security issue. So piggyback off a TCP connection. Once you have a established TCP connection, you spin off an encrypted UDP channel between the same IP pairs.
Build it with composability in mind and let people put congestion control, nat punchthrough, etc on a higher layer. | null | 0 | 1491181472 | 1491181896 | 0 | dfr16fq | t3_62z7p7 | null | null | t1_dfr0gwj | null | 1493742094 | 2 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
null | autotldr | null | This is the best tl;dr I could make, [original](https://arstechnica.com/security/2017/04/wikileaks-releases-code-that-could-unmask-cia-hacking-operations/) reduced by 81%. (I'm a bot)
*****
> The existence code itself is not that revelatory, since documentation of the techniques in the code were included in WikiLeaks' large initial dump.
> Code obfuscation is a fundamental part of the malware author's art of "Anti-forensics"-making it difficult for an adversary to reverse-engineer what is going on with the code, and in turn to attribute where the nasty code came from.
> Using the code in this WikiLeaks release, developers could potentially create tools to search for existing CIA implants.
*****
[**Extended Summary**](http://np.reddit.com/r/autotldr/comments/633kum/wikileaks_releases_code_that_could_unmask_cia/) | [FAQ](http://np.reddit.com/r/autotldr/comments/31b9fm/faq_autotldr_bot/ "Version 1.65, ~93843 tl;drs so far.") | [Theory](http://np.reddit.com/r/autotldr/comments/31bfht/theory_autotldr_concept/) | [Feedback](http://np.reddit.com/message/compose?to=%23autotldr "PM's and comments are monitored, constructive feedback is welcome.") | *Top* *keywords*: **code**^#1 **CIA**^#2 **malware**^#3 **WikiLeaks**^#4 **tool**^#5 | null | 0 | 1491181532 | False | 0 | dfr18f4 | t3_6311xk | null | null | t3_6311xk | null | 1493742121 | 2 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
null | [deleted] | null | [deleted] | null | 0 | 1491181545 | False | 0 | dfr18sv | t3_631p99 | null | null | t1_dfqymqq | null | 1493742126 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
null | autotldr | null | This is the best tl;dr I could make, [original](https://techcrunch.com/2017/04/02/why-do-developers-who-could-work-anywhere-flock-to-the-worlds-most-expensive-cities/) reduced by 86%. (I'm a bot)
*****
> The average financier in NYC or London would be laughed out of the office, and not invited back, if they told their boss they wanted to henceforth work from Chiang Mai.
> I should know: at HappyFunCorp, we work extensively with remote teams, and actively recruit remote developers, and it works out fantastically well.
> I recently spent some time in Reykjavik at a house AirBNBed for the month by an ever-shifting crew of temporary remote workers, keeping East Coast time to keep up with their jobs, while spending mornings and weekends exploring Iceland - but almost all of us then returned to live in the Bay Area.
*****
[**Extended Summary**](http://np.reddit.com/r/autotldr/comments/633l1c/why_do_developers_who_could_work_anywhere_flock/) | [FAQ](http://np.reddit.com/r/autotldr/comments/31b9fm/faq_autotldr_bot/ "Version 1.65, ~93849 tl;drs so far.") | [Theory](http://np.reddit.com/r/autotldr/comments/31bfht/theory_autotldr_concept/) | [Feedback](http://np.reddit.com/message/compose?to=%23autotldr "PM's and comments are monitored, constructive feedback is welcome.") | *Top* *keywords*: **work**^#1 **developer**^#2 **remote**^#3 **people**^#4 **team**^#5 | null | 0 | 1491181556 | False | 0 | dfr195i | t3_62zrgk | null | null | t3_62zrgk | null | 1493742131 | 0 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
null | tkannelid | null | Maybe people who use C complain that other languages seem like they've got training wheels on? Like they're designed to make up for the inadequacies of bad programmers instead of allowing good programmers to be expressive or write efficient code or something.
I think that attitude is mostly crud. | null | 0 | 1491181613 | False | 0 | dfr1awj | t3_631p99 | null | null | t1_dfqvsqr | null | 1493742154 | 2 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
null | EntroperZero | null | > Fira Code
The ligatures for >= and <= are just so wrong in this. | null | 0 | 1491181677 | False | 0 | dfr1ct5 | t3_62qrve | null | null | t1_dfp5xzx | null | 1493742179 | 3 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
null | phire | null | Very few queries will go out to the root servers, it's only one query for each top-level-domain you encounter. The result will get cached for a long time.
| null | 0 | 1491181694 | False | 0 | dfr1da3 | t3_62vx64 | null | null | t1_dfqghfj | null | 1493742185 | 2 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
null | Derimagia | null | Thousands, using curl + jq + urls easily fills a few lines.. and it's not even complicated at all. (Moving to a script would be pointless). | null | 0 | 1491181831 | False | 0 | dfr1hbe | t3_62u62i | null | null | t1_dfqp1eg | null | 1493742239 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
null | tkannelid | null | > It allows for crazy things such as using live variables members.
`with` statement in D. And that's kind of hideous syntax for defining methods. | null | 0 | 1491182118 | False | 0 | dfr1px0 | t3_631p99 | null | null | t1_dfqvt9c | null | 1493742355 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
null | derpderp3200 | null | Minor difference in timing can completely change how a fighting game goes down, in FPS it might affect who dies first once in a few dozen firefights when you get down to millisecond level differences in reaction times, but I'm willing to bet that most if not all players calling for more than 60fps do so due to placebo. | null | 0 | 1491182160 | False | 0 | dfr1r7p | t3_62yl50 | null | null | t1_dfqj0a2 | null | 1493742372 | 4 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
null | snaftyroot | null | i believe programming articles are ironically the bane of your existence | null | 0 | 1491182258 | False | 0 | dfr1u3r | t3_62zrgk | null | null | t1_dfr195i | null | 1493742411 | 3 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
null | derpderp3200 | null | Most games do this, it's much more noticeable when you don't hit someone you clearly had your cursor over than it is to be hit when from your POV, enemy aim was slightly off. I believe Source switches it once the ping is high enough but don't quote me on that. | null | 0 | 1491182283 | False | 0 | dfr1utx | t3_62yl50 | null | null | t1_dfqd578 | null | 1493742421 | 3 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
null | QuoteMe-Bot | null | > Most games do this, it's much more noticeable when you don't hit someone you clearly had your cursor over than it is to be hit when from your POV, enemy aim was slightly off. I believe Source switches it once the ping is high enough but don't quote me on that.
~ */u/derpderp3200* | null | 0 | 1491182290 | False | 0 | dfr1v29 | t3_62yl50 | null | null | t1_dfr1utx | null | 1493742424 | 9 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
null | kenmacd | null | > I mean, it's not that common.
1-packet ones, sure, but non-volumetric attacks are very common.
> Stop being so condescending
Lol, man, you're the one trying to tell me 'literally' what DoS is about.
Telling people: "don't put data in cookies except the session tokens" is bad advice. Yes it might be 'pretty safe' in every day operations, but it makes you much more susceptible to resource exhaustion attacks.
Encrypted and signed cookie values are supported by pretty much every webapp framework today. All you have to do is set a random key. It's a simple and secure way to store data. There's no reason to throw that out because people sometimes don't set a proper key. | null | 0 | 1491182389 | False | 0 | dfr1xv1 | t3_62ul90 | null | null | t1_dfr02o6 | null | 1493742461 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
null | arbitrarycivilian | null | No. If you want to run with the food analogy, then flavor is _semantics_, while presentation is syntax. But analogies aren't very helpful. The fact remains that it's more important for a language to e.g. support unions than to have a pretty way to write `if` statements. | null | 0 | 1491182453 | False | 0 | dfr1zp6 | t3_631p99 | null | null | t1_dfr12y2 | null | 1493742486 | -21 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
null | kenmacd | null | Safer, but you have to weigh that against the user experience. With a long-term key you can move sessions around anywhere and keep them alive for as long as you want. | null | 0 | 1491182909 | False | 0 | dfr2d1z | t3_62ul90 | null | null | t1_dfpqx9y | null | 1493742665 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
null | humoroushaxor | null | Yeah I misunderstood what he was talking about. The most used guns in Counter Strike will 1 or 2 shot someone with a head shot so it can be pretty important. From the testing online I've seen most good players will notice up to about 90fps. | null | 0 | 1491182991 | False | 0 | dfr2ftt | t3_62yl50 | null | null | t1_dfr1r7p | null | 1493742702 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
null | desertrider12 | null | No, Java's designed for bad programmers. It means the language assumes you know what you're doing and gets out of your way. Watch Jonathan Blow's talks for a better explanation. | null | 0 | 1491183118 | False | 0 | dfr2jz6 | t3_631p99 | null | null | t1_dfqvsqr | null | 1493742758 | 6 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
null | RemindMeBot | null | I will be messaging you on [**2017-04-03 13:32:27 UTC**](http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=2017-04-03 13:32:27 UTC To Local Time) to remind you of [**this link.**](https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/62yl50/how_does_multiplayer_game_sync_their_state_part1/dfr0y8r)
[**CLICK THIS LINK**](http://np.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=RemindMeBot&subject=Reminder&message=[https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/62yl50/how_does_multiplayer_game_sync_their_state_part1/dfr0y8r]%0A%0ARemindMe! 12 hours) to send a PM to also be reminded and to reduce spam.
^(Parent commenter can ) [^(delete this message to hide from others.)](http://np.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=RemindMeBot&subject=Delete Comment&message=Delete! dfr2l3v)
_____
|[^(FAQs)](http://np.reddit.com/r/RemindMeBot/comments/24duzp/remindmebot_info/)|[^(Custom)](http://np.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=RemindMeBot&subject=Reminder&message=[LINK INSIDE SQUARE BRACKETS else default to FAQs]%0A%0ANOTE: Don't forget to add the time options after the command.%0A%0ARemindMe!)|[^(Your Reminders)](http://np.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=RemindMeBot&subject=List Of Reminders&message=MyReminders!)|[^(Feedback)](http://np.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=RemindMeBotWrangler&subject=Feedback)|[^(Code)](https://github.com/SIlver--/remindmebot-reddit)|[^(Browser Extensions)](https://np.reddit.com/r/RemindMeBot/comments/4kldad/remindmebot_extensions/)
|-|-|-|-|-|-| | null | 0 | 1491183151 | False | 0 | dfr2l3v | t3_62yl50 | null | null | t1_dfr0y8r | null | 1493742773 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
null | kenmacd | null | Yes, provided you can see the cookie. The cookie can be both encrypted and signed though, so there's no guarantee you'll know what's in it, but you can still replay it.
Typically the cookie would only be sent across an encrypted connection, so you couldn't see it though.
You can also include extra data in the cookie, like the IP address and the browsers User Agent. Then if this data doesn't match you can consider the key invalid. Of course if the attacker is on the same network they can copy these things. | null | 0 | 1491183155 | False | 0 | dfr2l8a | t3_62ul90 | null | null | t1_dfpkhm0 | null | 1493742775 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
null | frenris | null | The problem here is mutable references not untagged unions.
If you have a type of union<reference to structure> you can mutate the structure going while being sure that it's not an int. | null | 0 | 1491183190 | False | 0 | dfr2mcg | t3_62wye0 | null | null | t1_dfqyns9 | null | 1493742789 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
null | kenmacd | null | Or just sign your data with a proper key.
People are saying "Just use session IDs", but if you didn't create a good key then who's to say you have a good session id generator.
In general if you provide properly signed data to a client you can trust that properly signed data when it comes back because they can't sign their own data. | null | 0 | 1491183329 | False | 0 | dfr2qjb | t3_62ul90 | null | null | t1_dfqd82m | null | 1493742845 | 2 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
null | ryeguy | null | Why use a stateless token if you're going to do a lookup anyway? | null | 0 | 1491183525 | False | 0 | dfr2wf0 | t3_62ul90 | null | null | t1_dfq34hc | null | 1493742924 | 3 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
null | riddler1225 | null | Heh, thanks for sharing this. I hope when I have children I stress them out as much as this father does his! | null | 0 | 1491183567 | False | 0 | dfr2xqq | t3_62cco3 | null | null | t1_dfojdkd | null | 1493742942 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
null | kenmacd | null | It allows you to store an infinite amount of sessions with no memory, and still accept those sessions from any of your servers.
Yes there's a limit to how much you can store, but up to that limit storing data client side generally provides a very secure datastore. Provided you set a proper secret. | null | 0 | 1491183718 | False | 0 | dfr32lq | t3_62ul90 | null | null | t1_dfqjufk | null | 1493743007 | 2 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
null | NavelBarricade | null | The bottom line is at the same angle as the bottom of the > or <. Yeah, that's a bit weird but I like it. The font itself isn't as clean as I like though. Still, I'm compelled to use it for the sake of newness and change.
| null | 0 | 1491183738 | False | 0 | dfr33a0 | t3_62qrve | null | null | t1_dfr1ct5 | null | 1493743016 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
null | combinatorylogic | null | Just die already you commie shit, ok? | null | 0 | 1491183788 | False | 0 | dfr34un | t3_631p99 | null | null | t1_dfqpoii | null | 1493743037 | -19 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
null | [deleted] | null | So you respond to me with bullshit, and then you come back hours later, having gone through my post history, and tell me "just die already"? Really? | null | 0 | 1491184557 | False | 0 | dfr3rmm | t3_631p99 | null | null | t1_dfr34un | null | 1493743343 | 7 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
null | ownedbyaddiction | null | No, I feel like you may be conflating syntactic sugar with actual syntax. of which you'd want a language syntax that is clear and concise and obvious as to what it is doing, the syntactic sugar that enables it to do trickery that is both expressive and easy to read (which lends to it's beauty) isn't necessarily as important as the underlying features, but you can't disregard it altogether either. | null | 0 | 1491184562 | False | 0 | dfr3rrc | t3_631p99 | null | null | t1_dfr1zp6 | null | 1493743345 | 8 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
null | ioquatix | null | You can do that if you like, but you'd need to implement your own policy. If you don't have a key on the server, it will be generated each time the server is restarted, which can be a bit annoying. | null | 0 | 1491184666 | False | 0 | dfr3upe | t3_62ul90 | null | null | t1_dfqx5cz | null | 1493743384 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
null | arbitrarycivilian | null | Of course you want a clear and concise syntax. But that's easy, and basically a solved problem, IMO. | null | 0 | 1491184685 | False | 0 | dfr3v83 | t3_631p99 | null | null | t1_dfr3rrc | null | 1493743392 | -13 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
null | combinatorylogic | null | I met you before you piece of shit. You're that retarded commie scumbag who fancies himself a "programmer" for no reason. Sorry to break the news to you, but you're not even a code monkey, you're far too stupid even for this. | null | 0 | 1491184840 | False | 0 | dfr3zx6 | t3_631p99 | null | null | t1_dfr3rmm | null | 1493743455 | -18 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
null | FascinatedBox | null | A while back, two people on github gave Lily a pretty good prodding, and found a number of issues. But you're right: Static analysis is a lot better.
Coverity being free is news to me. Admittedly, I never explored the option as I could have, but I will make a note to do so. Thank you. | null | 0 | 1491185127 | False | 0 | dfr4858 | t3_62wye0 | null | null | t1_dfq7cll | null | 1493743571 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
null | FascinatedBox | null | I'm currently planning to rewrite the test suite so that all the tests will be able to run under a single process. Once that's done, then I'll start poking around with doing coverage scans and so forth. Right now it's not likely, because there's a much bigger need for tooling so that interested parties have a nice ecosystem to come into. | null | 0 | 1491185305 | False | 0 | dfr4d3r | t3_62wye0 | null | null | t1_dfqe6l8 | null | 1493743638 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
null | [deleted] | null | Well, socialism is the future, but why did you delete your post just to come back and make a new post with a more personal attack? | null | 0 | 1491185318 | False | 0 | dfr4dhg | t3_631p99 | null | null | t1_dfr3zx6 | null | 1493743643 | 5 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
null | FascinatedBox | null | I threw that in because I read this thread once: https://www.reddit.com/r/haskell/comments/45q90s/is_anything_being_done_to_remedy_the_soul/
Is that still the case, or is it better? | null | 0 | 1491185354 | False | 0 | dfr4eim | t3_62wye0 | null | null | t1_dfqkcvj | null | 1493743656 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
null | Zephyrix | null | The term you are looking for is command rate. It has always been at least ~60Hz, even before the server tick rate was changed. It is NOT an in game setting as /u/BarMeister claims.
[Source](https://www.reddit.com/r/Overwatch/comments/49fbn7/tick_rate_some_real_information/)
[Another user's excellent explanation](https://www.reddit.com/r/Overwatch/comments/49fbn7/tick_rate_some_real_information/d0sqi0s/)
[Overwatch Developers Talk - Netcode](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vTH2ZPgYujQ)
[Overwatch Developers Talk - High Bandwidth Update](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EqtNUFxgm38)
| null | 0 | 1491185454 | 1491187070 | 0 | dfr4hdn | t3_62yl50 | null | null | t1_dfqeeuh | null | 1493743694 | 2 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
null | FascinatedBox | null | C-style unions only have a tag for them if you put one in, say, the struct that they live in. But sometimes you know the data well enough that you don't need any tagging. I have a syntax tree where I know a certain branch will have an int in a union instead of the other field, which is a pointer. You can squeeze data structures out of a little more memory sometimes. | null | 0 | 1491185555 | False | 0 | dfr4kkp | t3_62wye0 | null | null | t1_dfqt2hy | null | 1493743737 | 2 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
null | Ahri | null | That reminds me of when I was in the Eve alpha, I had a 56k modem and each time they would release a new version it was like 1GB download, which took so long to download that by the time I started playing they usually had a new version out that I had to download...
Anyway, as for runtime play over a modem, the alpha didn't really work so well, but of course a lot has changed since then! | null | 0 | 1491185685 | False | 0 | dfr4ogs | t3_62yl50 | null | null | t1_dfqgduw | null | 1493743789 | 5 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
null | stiurb | null | i had to look it up cause i was confused as well, but U+0303 is the ~ accent, so it makes aña
| null | 0 | 1491185737 | False | 0 | dfr4q2p | t3_62xwba | null | null | t1_dfqxp9r | null | 1493743810 | 2 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
null | throwawayco111 | null | >It's also worth noting that Rust does have untagged C-style unions. They're currently implemented in nightly, and are on track to be stable by 1.18 (current release is 1.16).
As someone interested on Rust I don't wanna hear this shit again. If it is not stable then Rust doesn't have it. | null | 1 | 1491185799 | False | 0 | dfr4s1t | t3_62wye0 | null | null | t1_dfps1yq | null | 1493743836 | -1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
null | Draghi | null | How about Go? | null | 0 | 1491185822 | False | 0 | dfr4sr5 | t3_62yl50 | null | null | t1_dfqlk8r | null | 1493743845 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
null | Uncaffeinated | null | If you're frugal, it's definitely worth it. The majority of the "cost of living" is optional, and even with housing, you can economize by getting a roommate. | null | 0 | 1491186234 | False | 0 | dfr55cs | t3_62zrgk | null | null | t1_dfqn2nk | null | 1493744015 | 2 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
null | kheiron1729 | null | It's not about being pretty. It's about ease of use, which is a very important factor. On one end of the spectrum you have code that can be read as any English text and on the other end, you have some super cryptic language that is totally bizzare. When modelling real life scenarios, you'd want the syntax to nicely replicate the desired meaning. | null | 0 | 1491186234 | False | 0 | dfr55d4 | t3_631p99 | null | null | t1_dfr1zp6 | null | 1493744015 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
null | toronto-arrow | null | I never said Pharo isn't useful. In fact, I push Pharo as **the** Smalltalk to use. | null | 0 | 1491186382 | False | 0 | dfr5a0b | t3_62sm8g | null | null | t1_dfqx4u2 | null | 1493744077 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
null | AngriestSCV | null | So never sort anything that radix sort doesn't work on? Many problems don't have a known linear solution. | null | 0 | 1491186498 | False | 0 | dfr5dkq | t3_62wvfa | null | null | t1_dfq6rbq | null | 1493744124 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
null | pierovera | null | Ah, thanks for the sources! I tried looking around but I couldn't find anything supporting what the other guy claimed. | null | 0 | 1491186498 | False | 0 | dfr5dm0 | t3_62yl50 | null | null | t1_dfr4hdn | null | 1493744125 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
null | b4ux1t3 | null | Well, a lot of games can be mucked about with these days with simple tools like [poke](http://codefromthe70s.org/poke.aspx). Not as hardcore as fiddling about with ROM files and the like, but can be a lot of fun. | null | 0 | 1491186540 | False | 0 | dfr5exx | t3_62t4jt | null | null | t1_dfq89x7 | null | 1493744143 | 2 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
null | Dentosal | null | > I'm quite sure there are servers in the middle. To my understanding, they handle the matchmaker, and keep track of matches played and some match data. But I don't know how exactly the boundaries of what is and isn't done by the server.
Yes, but during the game it is synchronized only between the clients. That is the hard part, because there are time constraints. The other data can be sent or loaded slowly. | null | 0 | 1491186634 | False | 0 | dfr5hyu | t3_62yl50 | null | null | t1_dfqk7tc | null | 1493744183 | 3 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
null | achen2345 | null | I have run the tests: https://github.com/prettydiff/prettydiff/issues/427 | null | 0 | 1491186693 | False | 0 | dfr5jso | t3_62iuku | null | null | t1_dfqnr41 | null | 1493744207 | 2 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
null | [deleted] | null | [deleted] | null | 0 | 1491186756 | False | 0 | dfr5lm3 | t3_62zk1i | null | null | t1_dfq6j6k | null | 1493744231 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
null | ArkyBeagle | null | That's completely and utterly irrelevant to the things I work on. | null | 0 | 1491186827 | False | 0 | dfr5nnk | t3_62cx5d | null | null | t1_dfqbmd5 | null | 1493744259 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
null | sodafountan | null | Because with an increase in talent comes an increase in earning power thus inflating the costs of everything. | null | 0 | 1491187077 | False | 0 | dfr5vhh | t3_62zrgk | null | null | t1_dfr12nh | null | 1493744363 | 14 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
null | Uncaffeinated | null | I too came here expecting an article about learning SML. Oh well. | null | 0 | 1491187117 | False | 0 | dfr5wnb | t3_62zx67 | null | null | t1_dfqd91l | null | 1493744378 | 8 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
null | arbitrarycivilian | null | Ease of use is important, but ease of use is determined *more* by semantics than syntax. It's easier to use a language that doesn't have `null` pointers, no matter how pretty those `null`s may be.
And of course, it is completely undesirable to have a programming language that mimics English text, which is notoriously ambiguous. | null | 0 | 1491187352 | False | 0 | dfr63i4 | t3_631p99 | null | null | t1_dfr55d4 | null | 1493744470 | 0 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
null | stonefarfalle | null | When people say don't use malloc they don't mean use some other method of dynamic memory allocation they mean don't dynamically allocate memory.
Depending on the problem space you may be able to statically allocate all necessary memory up front. That is often done in embedded applications and in server code that must run forever. If you can't completely remove dynamic allocation it is much easier to keep track of it if you simplify the amount and pattern of allocation. | null | 0 | 1491187435 | False | 0 | dfr66ai | t3_62wye0 | null | null | t1_dfqkmyc | null | 1493744507 | 2 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
null | FG_Regulus | null | I don't know what world you're from, but take me with you. | null | 0 | 1491187440 | False | 0 | dfr66i6 | t3_631p99 | null | null | t1_dfr3v83 | null | 1493744510 | 13 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
null | arbitrarycivilian | null | I'm genuinely curious where syntax has been an obstacle for you when programming. Alternatively, what do you consider to be an open question in syntax design? | null | 0 | 1491187642 | False | 0 | dfr6d4e | t3_631p99 | null | null | t1_dfr66i6 | null | 1493744598 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
null | EntroperZero | null | It makes it harder to tell the difference between >= and >, and that's a deal breaker for me. Off-by-one errors are common enough when you can see the comparison operators. | null | 0 | 1491187787 | False | 0 | dfr6hp9 | t3_62qrve | null | null | t1_dfr33a0 | null | 1493744659 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
null | Zephyrix | null | It's anecdotal, but I have personally experienced playing a hitscan hero and killing someone at the same time as they killed me. | null | 0 | 1491188248 | False | 0 | dfr6vkl | t3_62yl50 | null | null | t1_dfqjkbp | null | 1493744844 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
null | emoprairiedog | null | Does anybody know if C++11 is supported on kdenlive? I saw that the codebase looks pretty old. | null | 0 | 1491188383 | False | 0 | dfr6zli | t3_632wq6 | null | null | t3_632wq6 | null | 1493744898 | 2 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
null | Spirko | null | Those diagrams remind me of the visualization of [Runge-Kutta method](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Runge%E2%80%93Kutta_methods) in the [Numerical Recipes books](http://tnt.phys.uniroma1.it/twiki/pub/TNTgroup/AngeloVulpiani/runge.pdf). | null | 0 | 1491188503 | False | 0 | dfr7329 | t3_62yl50 | null | null | t3_62yl50 | null | 1493744944 | 0 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
null | NavelBarricade | null | That's fair. I'm still a bit new to it but it seems pretty noticeable to me. I say that but tomorrow I'll end up making a mistake with it.
| null | 0 | 1491188743 | False | 0 | dfr7amw | t3_62qrve | null | null | t1_dfr6hp9 | null | 1493745045 | 2 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
null | [deleted] | null | [deleted] | null | 0 | 1491188845 | False | 0 | dfr7dut | t3_62xwba | null | null | t1_dfq3r2e | null | 1493745088 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
null | cym13 | null | Indeed.
And one point that strikes me is that I still see lots of companies that think "Wow, a lot of vulnerabilities have been found in open-source software and libraries these last years, they are a risk for my company. We should develop our own software it will be more secure.".
I'm not saying there is no good reason to do internal development but this is not one, I've hardly ever seen a company with proper security training of the developers and they won't magically know how to write software that is secure.
More vulnerabilities are found when more competent people look at the code, it shouldn't be seen as a risk because of that. | null | 0 | 1491189004 | False | 0 | dfr7iob | t3_6344ep | null | null | t3_6344ep | null | 1493745154 | 36 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
null | [deleted] | null | [deleted] | null | 0 | 1491189034 | False | 0 | dfr7jki | t3_62xwba | null | null | t1_dfq2744 | null | 1493745165 | 2 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
null | absurdparadox | null | Why does every fucking site try to enable notifications? Ffs | null | 0 | 1491189115 | False | 0 | dfr7lud | t3_62xwba | null | null | t3_62xwba | null | 1493745196 | 1 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
null | derpderp3200 | null | Please do fuck off bot. | null | 0 | 1491189120 | False | 0 | dfr7lz1 | t3_62yl50 | null | null | t1_dfr1v29 | null | 1493745197 | 2 | t5_2fwo | null | null | null |
Subsets and Splits
Filtered Reddit Uplifting News
The query retrieves specific news articles by their link IDs, providing a basic overview of those particular entries without deeper analysis or insights.
Recent Programming Comments
Returns a limited set of programming records from 2020 to 2023, providing basic filtering with minimal analytical value.