archived
stringclasses
2 values
author
stringlengths
3
20
author_fullname
stringlengths
4
12
body
stringlengths
0
22.5k
comment_type
stringclasses
1 value
controversiality
stringclasses
2 values
created_utc
stringlengths
10
10
edited
stringlengths
4
12
gilded
stringclasses
7 values
id
stringlengths
1
7
link_id
stringlengths
7
10
locked
stringclasses
2 values
name
stringlengths
4
10
parent_id
stringlengths
5
10
permalink
stringlengths
41
91
retrieved_on
stringlengths
10
10
score
stringlengths
1
4
subreddit_id
stringclasses
1 value
subreddit_name_prefixed
stringclasses
1 value
subreddit_type
stringclasses
1 value
total_awards_received
stringclasses
19 values
null
uzarnom
null
Same, but this is good too
null
0
1491112787
False
0
dfpxnc6
t3_62vxqx
null
null
t1_dfpmhrj
null
1493722744
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
DubiousEthicality
null
I feel your pain, GARNiDELiA is only available on iTunes and YouTube in the US.
null
0
1491112938
False
0
dfpxpl3
t3_62vx64
null
null
t1_dfpt5ic
null
1493722774
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
skippingstone
null
Definitely none of the linked list ones. Performance is horrible with linked lists.
null
1
1491112960
False
0
dfpxpyx
t3_62xwba
null
null
t1_dfpwveu
null
1493722779
-3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
geeeoooort
null
It does it
null
0
1491113064
False
0
dfpxrgv
t3_62vx64
null
null
t1_dfpwax3
null
1493722799
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
maxxi123
null
it does and I wouldnt exactly call Rust's lifetime system "automatic". More like, a shitload of work
null
1
1491113402
False
0
dfpxwfu
t3_62wye0
null
null
t1_dfpx12c
null
1493722866
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
MengerianMango
null
Read about symbolic computation. Would be cool to write this such that it takes an arbitrary equation and a variable to solve for as input. That's going to be way harder though (and not always possible). E.g. I input (xy)^2 = sin(z) and ask it to solve for x. The output should be x=sqrt(sin(z)/y^2 ) https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Symbolic_computation
null
0
1491113590
False
0
dfpxz9s
t3_62x23z
null
null
t3_62x23z
null
1493722905
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
TheThiefMaster
null
Last I heard OpenWatcom's C++ support was pretty outdated too.
null
0
1491113592
False
0
dfpxzak
t3_62sqe6
null
null
t1_dfpdbjr
null
1493722905
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
[deleted]
null
[deleted]
null
0
1491113593
1493147259
0
dfpxzb6
t3_62ul90
null
null
t1_dfpsww9
null
1493722905
13
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
auxiliary-character
null
>The linear search for the insertion point always completely dominates the insertion That is, of course, unless you already have the insertion point. If you have to do enough insertions at the same insertion point, this becomes irrelevant. >the random access maximizes your cache misses This is assuming you need to do searching in performance sensitive routines. If your use case looks more like a stack (push/pop) at intermediate points, then this becomes largely irrelevant. In addition, with a custom allocator, the list could be initialized in contiguous memory (like a vector of links), only needing to go outside the initial contiguous block for new insertions. While it certainly would be more cache intensive than a vector/array, due to the overhead of the pointers and the insertion cases, it would be less cache intensive than the random allocation case. At the same time, this would also preserve the O(1) insertion.
null
0
1491113807
False
0
dfpy2cg
t3_62wye0
null
null
t1_dfpx44f
null
1493722945
5
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
yawkat
null
What's the difference between tokens and sessions beyond the fact that the latter are usually stored in cookies? Is it how you use them (i.e. auth tokens only being used for auth)? Also, basic auth is annoying to use when you have strong password hashing, so it's not always an option. You also need to keep the password on the client which is a security risk.
null
0
1491113927
False
0
dfpy426
t3_62ul90
null
null
t1_dfps8st
null
1493722969
5
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
skulgnome
null
It looks like a lot of work compared to manual memory management, for sure. How hard would it have been to have a separate GC heap?
null
1
1491114005
False
0
dfpy54r
t3_62wye0
null
null
t1_dfpxwfu
null
1493722982
0
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
ckreon
null
What is it for?
null
0
1491114250
False
0
dfpy8nj
t3_62vx64
null
null
t1_dfpwe4z
null
1493723029
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
yawkat
null
Solutions like jwt add complexity that can be exploited, for example by choosing inferior or no encryption which allows you to send bogus session data, or by losing keys as described in the OP. It's not like token solutions are that difficult to scale either, the data needs hardly any relational consistency or even solid write guarantees, which makes it super easy to scale. And if you're worried about the extra database you're probably not at a scale where it matters yet anyway and your favorite rdbms you've already set up will work fine.
null
0
1491114306
False
0
dfpy9g2
t3_62ul90
null
null
t1_dfpmhkt
null
1493723039
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
Ranakor
null
DoS is not always traffic related, saturating traffic is one way, saturating the CPU is another and likely what the previous poster was refering to. However i can hardly see it happening on any decent platform either, it's not like the cpu time spent on auth checks is that big.
null
0
1491114356
False
0
dfpya62
t3_62ul90
null
null
t1_dfpvnaq
null
1493723050
13
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
rohbotics
null
Customers of Level 3 Communications
null
0
1491114375
False
0
dfpyafe
t3_62vx64
null
null
t1_dfpy8nj
null
1493723053
10
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
Ranakor
null
One easy way you can is replace "change me" with change me (not a string) in the version you ship, won't compile till they well, change it
null
0
1491114457
False
0
dfpybj9
t3_62ul90
null
null
t1_dfptomq
null
1493723068
5
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
erikd
null
Ocaml and Haskell are both fine languages for compilers.
null
0
1491114496
False
0
dfpyc26
t3_62wye0
null
null
t1_dfprbsb
null
1493723075
4
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
karma_vacuum123
null
Linux needs competition... but the Fuchsia repos look a little...sparse. if this is really their current status, this thing has years to go others have suggested that development inside Google is likely much further ahead and the released source is only updated periodically in any case, I'm not expecting to be using this any time soon
null
0
1491114510
False
0
dfpyc8n
t3_62tki4
null
null
t3_62tki4
null
1493723078
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
rydan
null
Well you could have a ton of servers and a ton of traffic with no quick way to coordinate sessions. I'm talking top 25 Alexa sites. Works fine on sites like mine that have 1000 visits per day but if it were millions I'd probably put data in the cookies too.
null
0
1491114574
False
0
dfpyd5d
t3_62ul90
null
null
t1_dfpftjt
null
1493723089
11
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
reini_urban
null
> We've learned a lot in the last 4 decades. And the Rust ownership model is logically flawless, at the expense of being conservative and making certain behaviors difficult to express Oh my. Of all languages with proper ownership model, Rust is by far the most flawed, and also the slowest. e.g. pony has a proper ownership model. even the slow parrot can do lock-less multi-threading. ATS has a far advanced typesystem, and thus can prove far better correctness. ...
null
1
1491114601
False
0
dfpydj1
t3_62wye0
null
null
t1_dfpr0ia
null
1493723094
-5
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
XORosaurus
null
By querying an external DNS server...
null
0
1491114750
False
0
dfpyfjw
t3_62vx64
null
null
t1_dfpxrgv
null
1493723122
9
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
vaniceast
null
Thanks for sharing your ideas. I'm planning on writing the next version of EQAN in C++. Like I said in the "limitation" section of the README the UI is far from perfect. I will rectify that soon.
null
0
1491114814
False
0
dfpygfp
t3_62x23z
null
null
t1_dfpwegc
null
1493723133
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
kitsunde
null
Tokens aren't a substitute for sessions. It's a substitute for basic-auth, for basically the reason you mentioned (assuming no third-party reasons). It's not meaningfully more of a security risk to keep the password on the client if they need to exchange their username and password to get the token in the first place. Although if you feel strongly that the attack surface increases if we're carrying it around, I wouldn't argue my case, it's a trade off. OAuth was invented if you need to give a third party to request a token securely, without having to ask the user to copy paste it like we sometimes do.
null
0
1491115032
False
0
dfpyjea
t3_62ul90
null
null
t1_dfpy426
null
1493723172
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
4_teh_lulz
null
Nearly none, unless you have a very specific position that requires it.
null
0
1491115036
False
0
dfpyjg1
t3_62xwba
null
null
t1_dfpwveu
null
1493723173
47
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
dfhaan
null
Implying that critical infrastructure isn't already on antique hardware. I spent 3 days last week resurrecting Windows NT 3.51 box. Hadn't seen a dual Pentium Pro board in 20 years at least.
null
0
1491115140
False
0
dfpyku1
t3_62sqe6
null
null
t1_dfp57tq
null
1493723192
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
geeeoooort
null
Yes and a lot of other servers
null
1
1491115392
False
0
dfpyo8j
t3_62vx64
null
null
t1_dfpyfjw
null
1493723237
0
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
obsCUR
null
You know watcom was used for games in the old days. Of course, developers would use hand crafted asm for low level stuff, but i think the compiler outputed pretty good stuff in its own right. On top of this, it supported a number of tweaks and fine tuning options for integrating the inline asm code so as not to bust the optimizations, among a number of things. I can't say for sure watcom output is definitely faster than gcc output, but given watcom proven track record, i wouldn't hurry and say gcc's main advantage is it's speed.
null
0
1491115543
False
0
dfpyq7p
t3_62sqe6
null
null
t1_dfpdbjr
null
1493723264
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
tetrabinary
null
Very few, if any. My problem with these questions is even if the knowledge was needed on the job, it's easy to look up. Even if there isn't an immediate example in your language (which there probably is), then you just translate it. Now you do want someone with good problem solving skills, but then you'd be better off with some unique puzzle that they couldn't have memorized before the interview. You may also want to ensure they have knowledge of basic data structures. If someone didn't know the difference between an array and a linked list that's not a good sign. But even then, these questions are overkill.
null
0
1491115546
False
0
dfpyq8y
t3_62xwba
null
null
t1_dfpwveu
null
1493723264
15
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
vaniceast
null
I think EQAN's algorithm leans on some of those concepts. Only problem is that the LHS of the "=" sign should be a single variable. EQAN can solve for x, y, and z provided your input equation is "x=sqrt(sin(z)/(y^2 ))". Multiple variables on LHS of the "=" sign will result in an error.
null
0
1491115625
1491119422
0
dfpyr9z
t3_62x23z
null
null
t1_dfpxz9s
null
1493723278
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
dym3k
null
You both are right. I've changed it to lighter words.
null
0
1491116017
False
0
dfpywh4
t3_62szbn
null
null
t1_dfpxehi
null
1493723349
4
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
shevegen
null
Yeah it is strange - so many april fool's posts appear half-correct. Just like your example how rustc is slow compared to C/GCC compilation - that is actually not a joke, it is true.
null
1
1491116124
False
0
dfpyxw1
t3_62wye0
null
null
t1_dfpr0ia
null
1493723367
-1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
stroborobo
null
I don't think the Smalltalk community would agree with you. I haven't personally used them, but what the smalltalkers around me said was that Pharo is quite a hassle sometimes with far less libraries than e.g. Concom's VisualWorks, let alone what they've told me about GemStone's crazy capabilities as a distributed database. I'm very impressed every time I see them building stuff using modern technologies even though they have such a small community to implement current protocols or file formats etc.
null
0
1491116129
False
0
dfpyxxz
t3_62sm8g
null
null
t1_dfpi927
null
1493723368
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
indigomm
null
The default value should be empty, and the framework should catch this and refuse to work - instead printing a message to go set the value using a command that generated a secure random value. A novice user will follow this to the letter and get a secure value. An expert may do something else, but will appreciate the need to use something random.
null
0
1491116597
False
0
dfpz42h
t3_62ul90
null
null
t1_dfpnt0l
null
1493723449
4
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
wlievens
null
> Maybe other languages have it harder If I understand correctly, in Spring (Java), JWT support is nonexistent and you have to integrate it yourself.
null
0
1491116609
False
0
dfpz47c
t3_62ul90
null
null
t1_dfpr3hx
null
1493723451
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
yawkat
null
Oh, I thought you were using token auth and session tokens as different concepts. Keeping passwords on the client *is* a risk in my opinion. Passwords should be login-only, because users like to reuse passwords. There's also the fact that you can invalidate a session, but can't invalidate a password, for example if you lose your device. But I guess it's not that big of a deal in some scenarios.
null
0
1491116640
False
0
dfpz4l2
t3_62ul90
null
null
t1_dfpyjea
null
1493723456
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
Xerxero
null
Same with redis
null
0
1491116752
False
0
dfpz5zu
t3_62ul90
null
null
t1_dfpohi1
null
1493723475
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
leobru
null
It reduces the chance of division by zero where it was not supposed to happen mathematically.
null
0
1491116902
False
0
dfpz7wl
t3_62hu4c
null
null
t1_dfosav6
null
1493723501
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
dym3k
null
/u/knome pointed this out - explanation should focus on removing ambiguity, because even this joke has two versions (for example: https://www.reddit.com/r/Jokes/comments/1nmkfq/a_programmer_is_going_to_the_grocery_store/ )
null
0
1491117124
False
0
dfpzasj
t3_62szbn
null
null
t1_dfpq56s
null
1493723541
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
kazagistar
null
And the wrapper type has to look like optional, with a single empty variant. Basically, its a way to make Optionals compile to null pointers when possible without special casing it too much.
null
0
1491117137
False
0
dfpzay4
t3_62wye0
null
null
t1_dfpwiex
null
1493723543
9
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
Fazer2
null
I checked his history and most of his comments have negative score. I guess he's just a hateful man.
null
0
1491117239
False
0
dfpzc9t
t3_62oqiw
null
null
t1_dfpeygl
null
1493723561
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
cybergibbons
null
Why? It's​ a genuine problem I have actively exploited against sites before.
null
0
1491117493
False
0
dfpzfme
t3_62ul90
null
null
t1_dfpvnsw
null
1493723605
5
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
cybergibbons
null
Why?
null
0
1491117505
False
0
dfpzfrt
t3_62ul90
null
null
t1_dfppt0a
null
1493723607
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
Rosydoodles
null
And then they'll just add quotation marks, probably. Not that I've unpicked a few things at work recently that were very much like that, not at all...
null
0
1491117521
False
0
dfpzfzl
t3_62ul90
null
null
t1_dfpybj9
null
1493723610
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
lathiat
null
http://api.rubyonrails.org/classes/ActionDispatch/Session/CookieStore.html "This cookie-based session store is the Rails default. It is dramatically faster than the alternatives."
null
0
1491117533
False
0
dfpzg4l
t3_62ul90
null
null
t1_dfpvnsw
null
1493723612
12
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
[deleted]
null
[deleted]
null
0
1491117564
1492910882
0
dfpzgj1
t3_62vx64
null
null
t1_dfpt95l
null
1493723618
20
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
orinocos_flow
null
no, just the ones you tell it to query. kinda like when you setup your DNS servers on your router.
null
1
1491117624
False
0
dfpzh9m
t3_62vx64
null
null
t1_dfpyo8j
null
1493723627
-1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
robertmassaioli
null
Number four misses the fact that Ubuntu is built on top of Debian. A pretty important part of the joke.
null
0
1491117734
False
0
dfpzimr
t3_62szbn
null
null
t3_62szbn
null
1493723646
9
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
emilvikstrom
null
Because the key needs to be coordinated between all machines in the cluster.
null
0
1491117749
False
0
dfpziu0
t3_62ul90
null
null
t1_dfpxca6
null
1493723649
6
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
veske
null
So you have a stack that is full and you are developing it ? Sounds very strange
null
0
1491117830
False
0
dfpzjuk
t3_62vx64
null
null
t1_dfpv6hd
null
1493723662
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
fwork
null
I'm so sorry.
null
0
1491118117
False
0
dfpznf3
t3_62sqe6
null
null
t1_dfpepoh
null
1493723709
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
[deleted]
null
[deleted]
null
0
1491118176
False
0
dfpzo5c
t3_62vx64
null
null
t1_dfpzh9m
null
1493723719
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
paholg
null
I've just started interviewing. In my limited experience, I would say that there tends to be an algorithm question like one of these to demonstrate general competence, and then a more in-depth question that is relevant to position they are hiring for.
null
0
1491118282
False
0
dfpzpfj
t3_62xwba
null
null
t1_dfpwveu
null
1493723736
6
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
WellAdjustedOutlaw
null
You're either being a pedantic dick, or you literally have no idea WTF you're talking about. Using BIND, or Unbound, or any of the other recursive-capable resolvers will work fine. It will query a lot of other servers in that it will traverse the structure of the DNS to resolve names, not just "the ones you tell it to query". That's called forwarding, and that's not what /u/geeeoooort was fucking talking about. So I'm guessing you're a pedantic dick that also doesn't know WTF you're talking about.
null
0
1491118799
False
0
dfpzvog
t3_62vx64
null
null
t1_dfpzh9m
null
1493723822
5
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
dym3k
null
Thank you /u/lampshadish2. I didn't know that. I had confirmed it and updated the site ( http://eattheworldbook.com/content.html#exp3-3 ).
null
0
1491119040
False
0
dfpzykb
t3_62szbn
null
null
t1_dfpn65e
null
1493723861
7
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
ITwitchToo
null
To be fair, i don't think the article really did a good job of explaining what the requirements (including performance requirements) for this whole system were to start with. And that's why I actually believe asking whether this DNS thing is over engineered is a valid thing to do. If this thing is just used for song lookup, i honestly don't see why a replicated postgres db (or mongo, or what have you) wouldn't be more than enough. It's just hard to tell without the data and a comparison.
null
0
1491119044
False
0
dfpzym0
t3_62vx64
null
null
t1_dfpukmb
null
1493723861
9
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
Auxx
null
Looking at Android repos, they're behind actual development a lot!
null
0
1491119390
False
0
dfq02qj
t3_62tki4
null
null
t1_dfpyc8n
null
1493723916
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
Adverpol
null
The irony is that it's posts like these that spark feelings like OP's post. It's like vegetarians posting on a meat lover forum. We know they're doing good stuff and yes the world would be a better place if everyone followed their principles but dammit now let me enjoy my steak. Note that I say this with the utmost respect for both the tone (polite) as well as the content (relevant) of your post.
null
0
1491119517
False
0
dfq049h
t3_62wye0
null
null
t1_dfpr0ia
null
1493723936
10
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
WellAdjustedOutlaw
null
Just a couple notes from someone fairly familiar with the DNS and how poorly developed resolver libraries impact it. First, this is a good idea in some ways (and lots of people do it already), but a terrible idea in other ways. For example, Consul and MS Active Directory both use DNS as a mechanism to query and answer for service discovery. In fact, service discovery was a component designed into the DNS (See: SRV records, which never caught on for general use). But this is a bad idea because different resolvers and servers query and answer with quirks. Unbound doesn't support all record types, so if they decide to use (or abuse) a record type not supported they're going to hit a dead end. The same applies for resolver libraries, though most OSs that Spotify would use are probably fine. Also, consistency in the DNS is _garbage_ in practice. Serial collisions happen frequently, and record modification without accompanying serial modification is too. Those two issues can seriously screw up IXFR, which means you basically rely on forced AXFR. For large zones, that can be a significant deal. Using `dns-java` made sense in their architecture, but I'd _strongly_ suggest people stay far away from most of the Java DNS libraries. Fun little tricks like: >The dns-java library will hold onto cached records for an hour if the local Unbound service fails or our DNS resolvers aren’t responding. That's actually a somewhat big problem, but they haven't screwed themselves with it yet. They will, though. Everybody does. Basically, what that means is the library improperly caches a result with a TTL that doesn't come from the answer. This is not only an RFC violation, but a huge potential to continue using stale, wrong, and maybe even harmful data in the face of failure. Imagine a network partition preventing an edge site from communicating with unbound instances. The rest of the network has detected a failure, and updated the data contained within their records. But these hosts have a library that instead of detecting a failure and stopping, will just blindly keep using the data that the entire rest of the network has abandoned. This is a potential disaster for things like leader election, primary db location information, key rotation, etc. Anyway, the world is full of "DNS tricks". The query/answer design works somewhat well, and the variety of record types and label topology makes adapting it for other purposes simple and attractive, if not extremely dangerous and ill conceived.
null
0
1491119953
False
0
dfq09ce
t3_62vx64
null
null
t3_62vx64
null
1493724003
26
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
isxek
null
It's a preference. I usually got the `term` version, since I don't really care for ligatures myself.
null
0
1491119956
False
0
dfq09dk
t3_62qrve
null
null
t1_dfox7hx
null
1493724004
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
redditpirateroberts
null
You say it's hard to do the diff analysis in two passes because when doing the first it doesn't know what will be in the second. So what about running the analysis on both simultaneously to allow for doing it in only two passes?
null
0
1491120037
False
0
dfq0abw
t3_62iuku
null
null
t3_62iuku
null
1493724016
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
Qatalife
null
Yeah I mean Haskell is probably one of the best. https://github.com/Gabriel439/post-rfc/blob/master/sotu.md#compilers
null
0
1491120215
False
0
dfq0cb4
t3_62wye0
null
null
t1_dfpyc26
null
1493724044
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
recycled_ideas
null
I don't think you actually read the article. This isn't a problem with using a default secret, that's irrelevant. The issue is using a secret which can be guessed in a dictionary attack. They did over a billion values before they got to super secret. At that kind of speed you could start
null
0
1491120267
False
0
dfq0cx1
t3_62ul90
null
null
t1_dfpnt0l
null
1493724052
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
WellAdjustedOutlaw
null
Anybody saying "full stack software engineer" isn't a good anything. >There are plenty of companies all over the world handing low latency services around the globe. That's not entirely true. There are a few that do, some that use those companies to do the work for them, and then there's everybody else that realizes nobody does low-latency anything from any real distance (physics is a bitch), so all low-latency is actually local anyway. >I'm sure they get by just fine without a 10 page long DNS bowl of soup. You must not understand how the internet or globally deployed services work. At all. Because 10 pages of DNS soup is pretty much a starter course for how most of the popular sites and services you use actually work. How is it that you think someone in the UK types "facebook.com" and gets a 10ms response, and someone in Hong Kong does the same thing and gets the same 10ms response? >This article read like Spotify has way too many engineers on payroll They do. >and they are over-engineering the fuck out of this particular part of the stack Actually, I think the opposite. They saw an existing technology, didn't understand its strengths and weaknesses properly, and adopted it. Writing their own data store and consensus protocol would have been over-engineering.
null
0
1491120346
False
0
dfq0dtr
t3_62vx64
null
null
t1_dfpv6hd
null
1493724064
8
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
Derpscientist
null
At work in the last month I've implemented shortest path, database linked list api, iterative parallel BFS tree walker and iterative DFS tree searcher. For a personal image processing project I implemented floodfill.
null
1
1491120388
1491159491
0
dfq0eb3
t3_62xwba
null
null
t1_dfpwveu
null
1493724071
6
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
iomonad2
null
DOS doesn't have dynamic linking, so there is no single 1.5MB libstdc++ binary to not fit. This toolchain only does static linking, so will use only the bits of libstdc++ that are actually needed. You can't use all of it at once, but you can use any of it. The 16-bit code generated by the i386 backend with the -m16 flag is really 32-bit code with operand override and address override bytes so that it runs in 16-bit mode - it won't run on an actual 8086 CPU.
null
0
1491120903
False
0
dfq0k3u
t3_62sqe6
null
null
t1_dfpmisw
null
1493724148
6
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
iomonad2
null
It's tiny model only so far. I'm working on support for small, medium, compact, large and huge models.
null
0
1491120961
False
0
dfq0kqi
t3_62sqe6
null
null
t1_dfpj3ko
null
1493724156
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
WellAdjustedOutlaw
null
Lookups are certainly the better part of this. But DNS is fraught with problems when updating these kinds of records. I can't even count the number of support calls I've seen at different places I've worked where customers data is totally mangled because an update was lost and not sent to the edge, or some similar tragic problem. They even touched upon a few issues in the article, but they haven't even scratched the surface.
null
0
1491121047
False
0
dfq0lpc
t3_62vx64
null
null
t1_dfps0l6
null
1493724169
10
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
Jukolet
null
That's correct, but you don't need more than a filter that populates SpringSecurityContext from the JWT token.
null
0
1491121700
False
0
dfq0sor
t3_62ul90
null
null
t1_dfpz47c
null
1493724262
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
Spajk
null
Do you maybe know of a place where security can be discussed? I am making a local network application and I am looking for tips and opinions on security.
null
0
1491121806
False
0
dfq0tti
t3_62ul90
null
null
t1_dfpnt0l
null
1493724277
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
didroe
null
What is the JWT doing for you in that scenario? You're going to have to look up the epoch somewhere, so why not just use a session id and look up everything?
null
0
1491122033
False
0
dfq0wae
t3_62ul90
null
null
t1_dfpnj3i
null
1493724311
12
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
Daniel15
null
ASP.NET is a fantastic platform. IMO it's the cleanest web platform available today, particularly with the design of the newer ASP.NET Core MVC.
null
0
1491122196
False
0
dfq0y05
t3_62ul90
null
null
t1_dfpunbo
null
1493724333
6
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
delfinom
null
The type translations are already wrong. "long" on 32-bit arch is 32-bit not 64-bit.
null
0
1491122542
False
0
dfq11ns
t3_6290hb
null
null
t1_dfl2e2b
null
1493724382
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
dagit
null
> It's really easy to make C and C++ crash and Rust definitely prevents some ways of doing that. From a security point of view, It's not really about the crashing. A memory unsafe program can almost always be exploited with some effort. And exploits range from leaking information and secrets, privilege escalation, to out right arbitrary code execution. Crashing just becomes the ideal case (give or take denial of service). Of course, for non security focused things crashing can be bad, but fixing crashes is a much higher bar. Even NASA struggles with that. Memory safety is so important and C and C++ put the burden of proof on the user. As code bases become larger and more complex that burden becomes intractable without tools help us. Most languages these days are memory safe, give or take escape hatches, but for some tasks it's kind of unreasonable to expect people to adopt them. Python would be an unreasonable choice for writing an industrial strength operating system. I get excited about rust because it sits in an interesting place. Reasonable replacement for C at some of the things C excels at while being type safe and more productive than either C or C++ (in my opinion, and I have years of professional experience with both C and C++ ).
null
0
1491123060
1491124287
0
dfq16yw
t3_62wye0
null
null
t1_dfpr0ia
null
1493724453
30
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
GTB3NW
null
I don't know, redis is fairly quick.. But even then sticky sessions could provide you that time.
null
0
1491123247
False
0
dfq18ut
t3_62ul90
null
null
t1_dfpyd5d
null
1493724477
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
Berberberber
null
> If we built planes, everyone would be dead. Where do you think avionics software comes from?
null
0
1491123248
False
0
dfq18v8
t3_62wye0
null
null
t1_dfpr0ia
null
1493724478
20
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
Shadowys
null
You could always turn in into a postfix notation and solve from there
null
0
1491123250
False
0
dfq18vt
t3_62x23z
null
null
t1_dfpyr9z
null
1493724478
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
nirataro
null
It takes literally one day to learn Kotlin coming from C#/Java background. I was really active in the community in the pre 1.0 Kotlin but I just can't be bothered to develop in JVM nor Android environment. As soon as their native target is completed, I'll be back in a second. Now th
null
0
1491123400
False
0
dfq1adq
t3_62utum
null
null
t3_62utum
null
1493724498
5
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
GTB3NW
null
JWT is designed to lower the barrier of CPU time spent checking if this user is who they say they are and what kind of access they have. There's nothing wrong with doing a lookup after to check the session hasn't been invalidated.
null
0
1491123610
False
0
dfq1cil
t3_62ul90
null
null
t1_dfplhqs
null
1493724527
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
addmoreice
null
Fanuc's api returns one value for cycling and another value when it's in feedhold...except if it's an EDM cnc....in which case those two values are reversed. The call to check if a machine is an EDM machine? it works...if it's not an EDM, if it *is* an EDM then there is a seg fault in the api and it crashes the process. So, to check if you have a machine in cycle or in feedhold, you first need to spawn a new process, see if it's an EDM machine, and if the spawned process crashes, then it's an EDM cnc, otherwise it's some other kind of CNC in which case you know which result is feedhold or cycling. Did I mention my main project is a multi process, multi-threaded, networked, system with a plugin architecture? We support OPC, OPC UA, MTConnect, Siemens, Fanuc, Fanuc robots, on and on and on, at last count I've written 30 some plugin's, and each and every damn one of them has some weird quirk or bug that will never be fixed and needs to be supported. Many of them need to support *multiple* versions of the api's or communication protocols because some machines will simply never be updated. Ever. For any reason. I'm not bald, but I can almost feel it coming....
null
0
1491123714
False
0
dfq1dlo
t3_62sqe6
null
null
t1_dfpznf3
null
1493724541
6
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
Berberberber
null
> "principles before personalities" This is kind of thing people say when they haven't actually had to deal with random, unqualified passers-by questioning their experience and judgement. That kind of thing absolutely takes a psychological toll on people, and it's not far-fetched to say that not enabling $circlejerk (whether Rust, or Haskell, whatever) is good for the community of programmers at large.
null
1
1491123754
False
0
dfq1e0c
t3_62wye0
null
null
t1_dfpsavo
null
1493724546
4
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
[deleted]
null
[deleted]
null
0
1491123818
False
0
dfq1en3
t3_62x23z
null
null
t1_dfq18vt
null
1493724555
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
cbmuser
null
But Rust has no stable support for architectures other than x86 meaning that people are actively supporting the Intel/AMD vendor lockin. Yes, I know Rust *can* be compiled for *some* other architectures, but those are all Tier II or worse meaning that they don't guarantee the next Rust update won't break anything. And, honestly, I would never use a language or compiler which has only beta support for my preferred architecture if I want to write critical code. What's the point of using a safe language when the compiler itself is not guaranteed to have stable support for my target? And lots of people are brushing these concerns off with "Who cares about non-x86 hardware.", yet lots of these people get never tired of expressing their concerns with the system management co-processors present on modern Intel and AMD chips. For me, portability and open hardware is more important than a safe language.
null
1
1491123880
False
0
dfq1fa1
t3_62wye0
null
null
t1_dfpr0ia
null
1493724564
10
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
Sebb767
null
Which, tbh, would be really funny when it's cracked. Imagine his face when he looks at the key and reads that!
null
0
1491124634
False
0
dfq1mnu
t3_62ul90
null
null
t1_dfpr72p
null
1493724661
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
addmoreice
null
I found an easy way to find a vegetarian in a crowded room. When the waiter asks how you want your steak, answer "bloody, I like to taste the murder". The vegetarian is the one who awkwardly laughs in surprise while everyone else looks confused.
null
0
1491124861
False
0
dfq1ove
t3_62wye0
null
null
t1_dfq049h
null
1493724691
-7
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
inu-no-policemen
null
Yea, they recently added Windows support (as host for development). Looks like it will be ready soon-ish.
null
0
1491124988
False
0
dfq1q3s
t3_62tki4
null
null
t1_dfpwcc9
null
1493724707
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
[deleted]
null
[deleted]
null
0
1491125178
False
0
dfq1rzz
t3_62xwba
null
null
t1_dfq0eb3
null
1493724735
11
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
Widdrat
null
JWT?
null
0
1491125387
False
0
dfq1u2q
t3_62ul90
null
null
t1_dfpyd5d
null
1493724763
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
vingborg
null
Indeed. What most people seem to miss in these discussions, is that while machine may soon overtake humans in most endeavours of the mind, they have no reason to. They are not motivated. They have no intent, they have no will. They don't wake up in the morning and think "it's great to be alive". In fact, they don't ever wake up, however clever they seem. And that is why your man-machine is so powerfull: humans bring purpose to the equation. Now, whether machines will ever reach that, and thus truly emancipate themselves from humans, is a philosophical (perhaps even religious) question of a completely different order. Maybe if they get teamed up with mice. A mouse/machine collaboration might work almost as well ;-) Artificial Intention, that's what I worry about.
null
0
1491125565
False
0
dfq1vrb
t3_62weyo
null
null
t3_62weyo
null
1493724784
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
gopher9
null
> Some basic proof tactics are provided. Actually, a whole new framework for creating tactics is provided: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pqFgYCdiYz4
null
0
1491125858
False
0
dfq1yj6
t3_62scvv
null
null
t1_dfpawhy
null
1493724822
3
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
icantthinkofone
null
On reddit, whenever anyone writes C code, a redditor will always claim buffer overflows and memory leaks. Cause they read about them on reddit.
null
1
1491125875
False
0
dfq1yow
t3_62wye0
null
null
t1_dfppx38
null
1493724824
4
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
kqr
null
I haven't had any noticeable problems with the OpenNIC anycast either.
null
0
1491126002
False
0
dfq1zy9
t3_62vx64
null
null
t1_dfpwv3r
null
1493724841
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
helm
null
Yeah, they're really shooting themselves in the foot, Beatles' style
null
0
1491126115
False
0
dfq2108
t3_62vx64
null
null
t1_dfptgxs
null
1493724855
5
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
jooke
null
Don't they intercept failed requests and redirect to their own site?
null
0
1491126119
False
0
dfq211p
t3_62vx64
null
null
t1_dfpwv3r
null
1493724856
9
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
jooke
null
Isn't that likely to be a lot slower since you'll not have very many addresses cached (relative to a public server)?
null
0
1491126218
False
0
dfq21zm
t3_62vx64
null
null
t1_dfpspo3
null
1493724868
4
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
peterfirefly
null
It turns out there is a better (and faster!) hack. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triple_fault#Other_uses
null
0
1491126341
False
0
dfq237b
t3_62sqe6
null
null
t1_dfpradf
null
1493724884
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
[deleted]
null
[deleted]
null
0
1491126358
False
0
dfq23d7
t3_62ul90
null
null
t1_dfq0y05
null
1493724887
-1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
matthieum
null
I'm pretty sure; it was discussed earlier this week on r/rust and tiny_fishbowl is a Tor developer ;)
null
0
1491126394
False
0
dfq23pn
t3_62oqiw
null
null
t1_dfpkj50
null
1493724891
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
sockmeistr
null
Why would you name this Opus? The [established open-source royalty-free Opus codec](https://opus-codec.org/development/) has been using that name for at least 5 years...
null
0
1491126449
False
0
dfq248x
t3_62ys2x
null
null
t3_62ys2x
null
1493724898
21
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
vytah
null
Linked lists are useful in certain environments, like when you don't have enough memory to play around with copying your arraylist, you can't just use a bunch of fixed-size buffer, because you can't waste memory for the empty space in them, and your processor doesn't have a cache, so you won't get the bonus of locality effects when iterating over the list. But if that's the case, maybe the answer is "buy a better microcontroller".
null
0
1491126619
False
0
dfq25wz
t3_62xwba
null
null
t1_dfpxpyx
null
1493724920
2
t5_2fwo
null
null
null
null
peterfirefly
null
There were plenty of DOS extenders for 16-bit protected mode. Borland Pascal 7.0 could build 16-bit protected mode binaries with absolutely no hassles.
null
0
1491126642
False
0
dfq264t
t3_62sqe6
null
null
t1_dfpu1rr
null
1493724923
1
t5_2fwo
null
null
null