archived
stringclasses
2 values
author
stringlengths
3
20
author_fullname
stringlengths
4
12
body
stringlengths
0
22.5k
comment_type
stringclasses
1 value
controversiality
stringclasses
2 values
created_utc
stringlengths
10
10
edited
stringlengths
4
12
gilded
stringclasses
7 values
id
stringlengths
1
7
link_id
stringlengths
7
10
locked
stringclasses
2 values
name
stringlengths
4
10
parent_id
stringlengths
5
10
permalink
stringlengths
41
91
retrieved_on
stringlengths
10
10
score
stringlengths
1
4
subreddit_id
stringclasses
1 value
subreddit_name_prefixed
stringclasses
1 value
subreddit_type
stringclasses
1 value
total_awards_received
stringclasses
19 values
False
Mora616
t2_ymtpo8v
Honestly, this post makes me feel better about myself.
null
0
1546118078
False
0
ectr2xl
t3_aaoxtq
null
null
t3_aaoxtq
/r/programming/comments/aaoxtq/things_i_dont_know_as_of_2018/ectr2xl/
1548237739
10
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
winger_sendon
t2_zoz0d
They aim for simplicity but are not made for "stupid" programmers as Rob Pike likes to call them.
null
0
1546118097
False
0
ectr3tn
t3_aac4hg
null
null
t1_ecsk77p
/r/programming/comments/aac4hg/modern_c_lamentations/ectr3tn/
1548237750
2
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
dpkonofa
t2_35893
I think this is part of what’s confusing me.
null
0
1546118250
False
0
ectravy
t3_aajb7r
null
null
t1_ecthlv1
/r/programming/comments/aajb7r/how_doom_fire_was_done/ectravy/
1548237836
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
day_tripper
t2_3p8mf
That is very encouraging! We can’t believe everything we read I suppose. My personal experience: every shop I have worked in has had over 50s doing everything from PM to BA to Dev. The “kids” tend toward front end because the fashions change so often.
null
0
1546118266
False
0
ectrbng
t3_aandti
null
null
t1_ectqo5j
/r/programming/comments/aandti/older_workers_pushed_out_of_work_or_forced_into/ectrbng/
1548237846
18
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
vraGG_
t2_gpw69
I don't think it's related, but there's one problem I have consistently over 2 machines, same as a coworker - Mint + Caja will freeze when copying files through Caja or any GUI file explorer. The only way to solve it is to kill the file explorer and retry, or do it through terminal. It happens more often with larger files or when copying to network/external drives. I don't know how to fix it or troubleshoot it, but I've noticed the same pattern on 3 different PCs. Again, I know it's probably not relevant, but things like this is what keeps a regular user away from a - in many ways - superior OS. Hiccups here and there for which you need some tech know-how to solve.
null
1
1546118409
False
0
ectri77
t3_aalc4n
null
null
t3_aalc4n
/r/programming/comments/aalc4n/windows_file_access_performance_compared_to_linux/ectri77/
1548237927
-3
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
chewyfruitloop
t2_4ugok
We have an attitude of ... if you can do the job and you aren’t a total nut bag, we will probably hire you.
null
0
1546118454
False
0
ectrka4
t3_aandti
null
null
t3_aandti
/r/programming/comments/aandti/older_workers_pushed_out_of_work_or_forced_into/ectrka4/
1548237952
28
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
fecal_brunch
t2_5dg8s
Oh, well if you're already a programmer then unity or UE for sure. That's what all the studios are using.
null
0
1546118458
False
0
ectrkgr
t3_aajb7r
null
null
t1_ectcekz
/r/programming/comments/aajb7r/how_doom_fire_was_done/ectrkgr/
1548237955
2
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
masterofmisc
t2_dqd35
That's very interesting. So many thoughts running through my mind as to what your product may be. :) Thanks for replying.
null
0
1546118476
False
0
ectrlao
t3_aac4hg
null
null
t1_ectqhc3
/r/programming/comments/aac4hg/modern_c_lamentations/ectrlao/
1548237966
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
cryo
t2_321gp
> Is the NT approach worth it? No.
null
0
1546118533
False
0
ectro03
t3_aalc4n
null
null
t1_ect4c03
/r/programming/comments/aalc4n/windows_file_access_performance_compared_to_linux/ectro03/
1548237999
-12
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
icbmike_for_realz
t2_14tefl
I'm sorry, I'm not seeing where you got one pass the compiler. Could you please explain?
null
0
1546118558
False
0
ectrp89
t3_aai5ap
null
null
t1_ectoxwq
/r/programming/comments/aai5ap/what_is_a_monad_computerphile/ectrp89/
1548238014
3
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
Determinant
t2_3fmrp
Thanks. Reading through those comments, I saw this link near the end: https://twitter.com/netbeans/status/1049976758278209537?s=20 So perhaps there is some hope.
null
0
1546118685
False
0
ectrv4f
t3_aansm3
null
null
t1_ectpgqx
/r/programming/comments/aansm3/netbeans_10_released_the_best_swing_gui_builder/ectrv4f/
1548238087
2
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
airflow_matt
t2_meh1h
It's actually fork of [folly/Function](https://github.com/facebook/folly/blob/master/folly/docs/Function.md), a non copyable function wrapper. Those callbacks are invoked asynchronously so they need need to be preserved when getting out of scope.
null
0
1546118783
False
0
ectrzii
t3_aac4hg
null
null
t1_ectqtke
/r/programming/comments/aac4hg/modern_c_lamentations/ectrzii/
1548238142
3
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
wutcnbrowndo4u
t2_4izh8
Ah, that's probably fair. I know it would've been better than Python in the particular nightmare I lived through, but that's a pretty low bar, as static typing to begin with would've saved a lot of headaches.
null
0
1546118792
False
0
ectrzxe
t3_a8rptf
null
null
t1_ecsjh80
/r/programming/comments/a8rptf/i_do_not_like_go/ectrzxe/
1548238146
2
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
welkam
t2_o4k0x
[Introducing Riptide: WebKit’s Retreating Wavefront Concurrent Garbage Collector](https://webkit.org/blog/7122/introducing-riptide-webkits-retreating-wavefront-concurrent-garbage-collector/) [Unreals GC](https://wiki.unrealengine.com/Garbage_Collection_Overview) ​ Not all GCs have pauses and not all uses are sensitive to pauses. For games there is usually 1 core that is at 100% while others are partly loaded. In such case you can have main rendering loop be GC free while other parts use GC.
null
0
1546118794
False
0
ectrzzq
t3_aac4hg
null
null
t1_ect3flt
/r/programming/comments/aac4hg/modern_c_lamentations/ectrzzq/
1548238147
2
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
FG_Regulus
t2_aybf9
I think it's completely harmless since they provide \`nimgrep\` and \`nimsuggest\` out of the box. However I'd prefer it if they reconsidered and simply enforced a universal language styling a la Go. Mostly because it would end these God damn discussions about such a minor feature and let us talk about something else. Seriously - the language has lots of places to praise and places we can have a legitimate talk about improving, yet every time Nim comes up we waste 75% of the thread with this garbage.
null
0
1546118802
False
0
ects0e7
t3_aaamfb
null
null
t1_ecqbbsi
/r/programming/comments/aaamfb/how_you_ever_thought_about_which_casing/ects0e7/
1548238152
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
FG_Regulus
t2_aybf9
The idea is that each organization / project will have code standards. Being agnostic to case and scores allows one to use that standardized style consistently throughout the codebase without having to mix all 15 different styles from different libraries like in most of the C++ code I've seen. It's actually really lovely and I enjoy it. It's easy to say that it ruins searchability, but Google doesn't care, fuzzy finders don't care, and you can use \`nimgrep\` for dumb searching or \`nim suggest\` for semantic-aware symbol finding. The replacement tooling already exists in full capacity that this is not a legitimate complaint over the feature. \`nim pretty\` will also be able to handle it IIRC. As I said in another comment, though, I think it would be best at this point to simply enforce all Nim symbols *must* obey the One True Style chosen arbitrarily by the language. Just end the discussion.
null
0
1546119094
False
0
ectsdob
t3_aaamfb
null
null
t1_ecrlcp8
/r/programming/comments/aaamfb/how_you_ever_thought_about_which_casing/ectsdob/
1548238346
2
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
Ateist
t2_3d1y3
I do, but I wanted to add some type safety - and was extremely disappointed with the result of upgrading to enum types. Wasted a lot of work for nothing.
null
0
1546119220
False
0
ectsjh7
t3_aac4hg
null
null
t1_ectpxg8
/r/programming/comments/aac4hg/modern_c_lamentations/ectsjh7/
1548238417
0
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
FG_Regulus
t2_aybf9
Lisps don't have infix operators, it's always (call p1 p2). In that way they have a unique opportunity to use hyphens. From time to time I hear people talking about the idea of making the hyphen sensitive to surrounding spaces - if it's touching an identifier it's a part of the name but if it's floating it's an operator... That sounds potentially messy, though. I'd like to see it in practice.
null
0
1546119241
False
0
ectskhw
t3_aaamfb
null
null
t1_ecqrb8d
/r/programming/comments/aaamfb/how_you_ever_thought_about_which_casing/ectskhw/
1548238430
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
ESCAPE_PLANET_X
t2_7rkse
Man that explains a lot about some odd performance things I've seen with WSL.
null
0
1546119246
False
0
ectskq7
t3_aalc4n
null
null
t3_aalc4n
/r/programming/comments/aalc4n/windows_file_access_performance_compared_to_linux/ectskq7/
1548238433
11
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
larsga
t2_1s7k
C++ and Scala are similar in that they give the user a lot of rope, and people often turn all that rope into tangled messes. It's not that it's impossible to write clean C++ or clean Scala, but that people so often don't. For me everything hinges on the readability of the code, which I find is often low with Scala. So if these language innovations don't yield something more readable than plain, simple for loops, where is the value?
null
0
1546119514
False
0
ectsxm6
t3_aac4hg
null
null
t1_ectgzs6
/r/programming/comments/aac4hg/modern_c_lamentations/ectsxm6/
1548238591
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
Sedbict
t2_670l7m
Yea thank you, I've been looking into GB documentation a while ago but never got around and implemented anything. I guess there's a first time for anything
null
0
1546119622
False
0
ectt305
t3_aaml78
null
null
t1_ectpi8j
/r/programming/comments/aaml78/rpcs3_ps3_emulator_november_2018_progress_report/ectt305/
1548238658
4
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
winger_sendon
t2_zoz0d
[Link to interview](http://harmful.cat-v.org/software/c++/I_did_it_for_you_all)
null
0
1546119691
False
0
ectt6ew
t3_aac4hg
null
null
t1_ecs8z3x
/r/programming/comments/aac4hg/modern_c_lamentations/ectt6ew/
1548238701
3
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
bdtddt
t2_x8et0
Absolutely not. Even Java has had those things for years, why would anyone try to learn something as notoriously difficult as monads without understand basic features of any modern language?
null
0
1546119736
False
0
ectt8pi
t3_aai5ap
null
null
t1_ectoobj
/r/programming/comments/aai5ap/what_is_a_monad_computerphile/ectt8pi/
1548238728
-6
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
appoloman
t2_4k5vc
Thanks for the well thought out reply. I agree, i really do. I just worry that the unspoken assumption of readability first may be producing a local maximum of sorts. Prohibiting highly generic, highly modularised, and you'll have to forgive me for the phrase, but "write once, read never" sort of code. I *know* it's utopian and impossible, but "properly" factored code, behind clear, obvious, impossible to misuse interfaces can in my mind be as generic and even as arcane to read as you like, and if you're targeting, for instance, composability over readability, even should be. Not that the point is about "Composability > Readability," it's more about, how sure are we that if we go down the other route, (ie, the route that doesn't place as much focus on local or even (and I hesitate here,) system readability,) that at some point the scale wont tip and we'll see massive returns on how easy it becomes to string together application code. I'm not so much a fan of other avenues of thought and experimentation getting shut down because "it's not readable," and thus any other benefits it might have are ignored, or at least treated as a very-rare exceptional case.
null
0
1546119959
1546120219
0
ecttkeg
t3_aac4hg
null
null
t1_ectbco4
/r/programming/comments/aac4hg/modern_c_lamentations/ecttkeg/
1548238903
2
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
hgjsusla
t2_a6egp
But I don't get it, not implicitly converting to int is what type safety means. That's the whole point of `enum class`.
null
0
1546120358
False
0
ectu4o1
t3_aac4hg
null
null
t1_ectsjh7
/r/programming/comments/aac4hg/modern_c_lamentations/ectu4o1/
1548239153
2
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
__crackers__
t2_oen2h
You don't have to bundle an entire browser with your app just to render some HTML. Every modern GUI toolkit has a built-in webview widget that is perfectly capable of that.
null
0
1546120386
False
0
ectu638
t3_a9tm4z
null
null
t1_ecpbjr7
/r/programming/comments/a9tm4z/notable_the_markdownbased_notetaking_app_that/ectu638/
1548239171
3
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
thetdotbearr
t2_4tonw
Wow. Yeah that was a painful read 😬
null
0
1546120491
False
0
ectub7p
t3_aai5ap
null
null
t1_ecszn4j
/r/programming/comments/aai5ap/what_is_a_monad_computerphile/ectub7p/
1548239234
6
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
Hauleth
t2_7aea6
I think it will be a mess. Instead I like Erlang approach, where `-` is a function, `erlang:'-'/2` to be exact. So you can define functions with “weird” names quite easily (and call them without much trouble as well). In Elixir it is a little bit more troublesome though, but still possible.
null
0
1546120605
False
0
ectugup
t3_aaamfb
null
null
t1_ectskhw
/r/programming/comments/aaamfb/how_you_ever_thought_about_which_casing/ectugup/
1548239303
2
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
foxh8er
t2_60e80
That's the popular thing to say but its kinda bs tbh. One of my solutions was suboptimal and I only got to the first question and locked up on the follow up.
null
0
1546120677
False
0
ectukc3
t3_aaco1d
null
null
t1_ectjx11
/r/programming/comments/aaco1d/things_i_dont_know_as_of_2018/ectukc3/
1548239347
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
lelanthran
t2_pnmpo0f
> Mint + Caja will freeze when copying files through Caja or any GUI file explorer. The only way to solve it is to kill the file explorer and retry, or do it through terminal. > > It happens more often with larger files or when copying to network/external drives. I have the same (consistent) problem: it's not crashed, it unfreezes after a while (depending on how large the file is and how slow the transfer is). I usually wait about five minutes, and then the copy completes. I do not know why it does this, but it seems that the GUI waits for the copy to complete without responding to the user.
null
0
1546121134
False
0
ectv722
t3_aalc4n
null
null
t1_ectri77
/r/programming/comments/aalc4n/windows_file_access_performance_compared_to_linux/ectv722/
1548239658
2
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
winger_sendon
t2_zoz0d
The problem here is not importing ("using" in C++) but having to #include huge files because the compiler works with one file at a time, unlike other languages.
null
0
1546121171
False
0
ectv8wk
t3_aac4hg
null
null
t1_ecs0jir
/r/programming/comments/aac4hg/modern_c_lamentations/ectv8wk/
1548239682
4
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
exorxor
t2_h57gcb9
The handful of people on the planet doing something for programming that actually matters.
null
0
1546121179
False
0
ectv9af
t3_aap7iv
null
null
t3_aap7iv
/r/programming/comments/aap7iv/the_science_of_deep_specification/ectv9af/
1548239687
3
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
redditrasberry
t2_2nzkn
The way I think about it, monads are how functional programmers work around the fact they broke everything by pretending state doesn't exist. The reason they are so hard to understand is that you can't get why they are necessary until you put yourself in the situation of being a functional programmer and having no way to solve the problem that some kind of side effect happened. And you *really* don't want to admit that functional programming is broken, so you invent this idea, cloak it in all kinds of incomprehensible jargon and then ship it out to the world as if you invented something new rather than just band-aided a giant hole in your programming philosophy. Having said all that, the result is a pretty nice way of doing things that is a lot less error prone than traditional state handling.
null
1
1546121247
False
0
ectvcqk
t3_aai5ap
null
null
t3_aai5ap
/r/programming/comments/aai5ap/what_is_a_monad_computerphile/ectvcqk/
1548239729
-5
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
stronghup
t2_3mx3u
The economic model behind Elementary-OS (open-source) eco-system as summed up by the article: "If you opt not to pay for a paid app, you won't get automatic updates. The exception is security updates, which will be automatically applied regardless of whether you paid or not "
null
0
1546121301
False
0
ectvfej
t3_aapk53
null
null
t3_aapk53
/r/programming/comments/aapk53/linux_worlds_best_hope_for_the_mainstream/ectvfej/
1548239762
3
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
duxdude418
t2_4ebnc
> layers of redirection Layers of *indirection*.
null
0
1546121303
False
0
ectvfjb
t3_aajb7r
null
null
t1_ecsulri
/r/programming/comments/aajb7r/how_doom_fire_was_done/ectvfjb/
1548239764
10
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
Malor
t2_4fo45
> The difference is that Windows ACLs (for all their nightmarish complexity) are a much more robust system than a pair of IDs. Right, but ... hmm. What I'm trying to point out is that Linux's security systems are often trying to assign security to files based on the path, because that's how it thinks about files. But files don't necessarily have just one canonical path, and so it's easy to end up with the wrong permissions inadvertently. You might assign permissions to Path A, but if someone can reach the file via Path B, they may be able to read and/or modify it inappropriately. NT doesn't think that way. It assigns permissions, AFAIK, to actual files, not to paths. I just tested this, I created a file and made a hard link to it, and removing permissions on the original file also removed them from the hard link. This would *not* be true in Linux, at least with the bolted-on security systems like SELinux and AppArmor. (which are trying to retrofit, at least in this context, the advanced permissions that NTFS already implements.) edit: I changed this comment somewhat after I first wrote it. I tested a little and discovered that the really basic Unix filesystem permissions DO work across hard links, so at least that much of a file's permissions are truly attached to the file itself.
null
0
1546121359
1546121848
0
ectvi8s
t3_aalc4n
null
null
t1_ecte8sl
/r/programming/comments/aalc4n/windows_file_access_performance_compared_to_linux/ectvi8s/
1548239797
10
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
davidk01
t2_1c5pc
This is a valid criticism. That's why folks are still doing research on this and coming up with other ways to handle the issue of side-effects in a way that still makes it possible to reason about them in a static way: http://math.andrej.com/2012/03/08/programming-with-algebraic-effects-and-handlers/. Fundamentally state management is a hard problem. Most languages sweep it under the rug and there are no shortage of issues that result from this.
null
1
1546121381
False
0
ectvjc6
t3_aai5ap
null
null
t1_ectvcqk
/r/programming/comments/aai5ap/what_is_a_monad_computerphile/ectvjc6/
1548239810
4
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
winger_sendon
t2_zoz0d
You should rewrite ranges in rust.
null
0
1546121401
False
0
ectvkcs
t3_aac4hg
null
null
t3_aac4hg
/r/programming/comments/aac4hg/modern_c_lamentations/ectvkcs/
1548239823
3
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
Synackaon
t2_4uj1j
Thanks, I hate it. Jokes aside, I found myself wondering what I don’t know and it was slightly distressing.
null
1
1546121422
False
0
ectvlfx
t3_aaoxtq
null
null
t3_aaoxtq
/r/programming/comments/aaoxtq/things_i_dont_know_as_of_2018/ectvlfx/
1548239836
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
[deleted]
None
[deleted]
null
0
1546121621
False
0
ectvvbg
t3_aajb7r
null
null
t1_ect340o
/r/programming/comments/aajb7r/how_doom_fire_was_done/ectvvbg/
1548239959
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
moodysalem
t2_pqytl
What happens when there are merge conflicts?
null
0
1546121869
False
0
ectw7kq
t3_aankii
null
null
t3_aankii
/r/programming/comments/aankii/upforksh_keep_up_to_5_forks_updated_for_free_and/ectw7kq/
1548240138
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
skocznymroczny
t2_4zi6k
Still it is passé and you should use JavaFX instead.
null
0
1546121905
False
0
ectw9dz
t3_aansm3
null
null
t1_ectqdp0
/r/programming/comments/aansm3/netbeans_10_released_the_best_swing_gui_builder/ectw9dz/
1548240160
16
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
wolveroony
t2_q5ds6
So... What *does* this person know?
null
1
1546121981
False
0
ectwdag
t3_aaoxtq
null
null
t3_aaoxtq
/r/programming/comments/aaoxtq/things_i_dont_know_as_of_2018/ectwdag/
1548240209
3
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
AttackOfTheThumbs
t2_79zad
OK, so let's roll with this scenario. You've made a basic engine. You've learned some things about how they work, but you're not going to create an entire engine for your game. That's close to insanity. [That would be like creating your own language](http://www.mrphilgames.com/jai/)! Now you want to make a game, so you pick an engine and work based on that. Some of the things you've learned may help you, but do you really know how everything is working under the hood? Probably not. On top of that, if you are following "best practise" for that engine, shouldn't you assume that the developers of the engine have optimized their code, so your calling code doesn't need to think about it as much, so you can develop your game faster? No one needs to know everything. Being aware of certain things, even if you don't know the real reason, is for most developers, likely enough.
null
0
1546122040
False
0
ectwga8
t3_aajb7r
null
null
t1_ecte8o4
/r/programming/comments/aajb7r/how_doom_fire_was_done/ectwga8/
1548240246
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
skocznymroczny
t2_4zi6k
What's the problem?
null
0
1546122046
False
0
ectwgky
t3_aai5ap
null
null
t1_ecsbyf5
/r/programming/comments/aai5ap/what_is_a_monad_computerphile/ectwgky/
1548240249
3
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
fabiosantoscode
t2_fyr6x
You get an email so you can intervene. We're going to work a lot to try and reduce conflicts by tweaking the git merge settings, but I'm not sure how far we'll go with it.
null
0
1546122167
False
0
ectwmw7
t3_aankii
null
null
t1_ectw7kq
/r/programming/comments/aankii/upforksh_keep_up_to_5_forks_updated_for_free_and/ectwmw7/
1548240327
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
aaptel
t2_3iboj
that demo was amazing haha
null
0
1546122256
False
0
ectwr7r
t3_aalo6l
null
null
t3_aalo6l
/r/programming/comments/aalo6l/35c3_what_the_fax/ectwr7r/
1548240381
5
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
SanityInAnarchy
t2_5oygg
I did try ..=, but I guess the version of Rust I have installed is so old it doesn't support that. That's how long it's been since I last messed with Rust...
null
0
1546122284
False
0
ectwsoj
t3_aac4hg
null
null
t1_ecsqfc4
/r/programming/comments/aac4hg/modern_c_lamentations/ectwsoj/
1548240399
2
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
theaceshinigami
t2_eeral
I'm not saying you should, I'm saying you can.
null
0
1546122337
False
0
ectwvht
t3_aabai1
null
null
t1_ecst1xq
/r/programming/comments/aabai1/fish_shell_30/ectwvht/
1548240435
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
ferocioushulk
t2_216c2f7q
Cool. Can I get a large cappuccino?
null
0
1546122360
False
0
ectwwo2
t3_a9qz9q
null
null
t1_ecpuvzk
/r/programming/comments/a9qz9q/amoeba_finds_approximate_solutions_to_nphard/ectwwo2/
1548240449
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
aaptel
t2_3iboj
Slides here: https://smartlockpicking.com/slides/Confidence_A_2018_Practical_Guide_To_Hacking_RFID_NFC.pdf
null
0
1546122383
False
0
ectwxse
t3_aapqbu
null
null
t3_aapqbu
/r/programming/comments/aapqbu/confidence_2018_a_2018_practical_guide_to_hacking/ectwxse/
1548240462
3
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
mgostIH
t2_y3ijl
Fortunately the latest version is just a `rustup update` away! If it's very old, also run `rustup self update`.
null
0
1546122519
False
0
ectx4lc
t3_aac4hg
null
null
t1_ectwsoj
/r/programming/comments/aac4hg/modern_c_lamentations/ectx4lc/
1548240547
2
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
wean_irdeh
t2_uetxy
'Native Windows vs WSL file access performance' would be more correct title
null
0
1546122553
False
0
ectx6c1
t3_aalc4n
null
null
t3_aalc4n
/r/programming/comments/aalc4n/windows_file_access_performance_compared_to_linux/ectx6c1/
1548240568
45
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
tanelso2
t2_10vwrq
Ahhh auto fork syncing.... The one advantage Bitbucket has over Github
null
0
1546122561
False
0
ectx6r1
t3_aankii
null
null
t3_aankii
/r/programming/comments/aankii/upforksh_keep_up_to_5_forks_updated_for_free_and/ectx6r1/
1548240604
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
compsciwizkid
t2_3zy4b
*Technically* Artists
null
0
1546122606
False
0
ectx94i
t3_aajb7r
null
null
t1_ectehow
/r/programming/comments/aajb7r/how_doom_fire_was_done/ectx94i/
1548240634
2
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
HellfireOwner
t2_2juz5fhu
Sure, you can. I'm sure your boss will let you make one for yourself.
null
0
1546122610
False
0
ectx9f5
t3_a9qz9q
null
null
t1_ectwwo2
/r/programming/comments/a9qz9q/amoeba_finds_approximate_solutions_to_nphard/ectx9f5/
1548240636
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
Ateist
t2_3d1y3
The *need* to retrieve the value out of enum *still exists*. With C style enums, you can at least get a compile time warning if you try to implicitly convert them to something like float or pointer with an appropriate Conversion Warning setting of your compiler. But if you use a conversion operator to retrieve it, you won't get that warning, even if you later change the type of your enum class to something different. The proper solution would be something like int color_value = enum::getvalue(ECOLOR); instead of int color_value = static_cast<int>(ECOLOR); If later you change the type of ECOLOR to something else, like double, you'd get a warning.
null
0
1546122612
1546122797
0
ectx9jd
t3_aac4hg
null
null
t1_ectu4o1
/r/programming/comments/aac4hg/modern_c_lamentations/ectx9jd/
1548240638
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
NotUniqueOrSpecial
t2_3wrgy
> What I'm trying to point out is that Linux's security systems are often trying to assign security to files based on the path, because that's how it thinks about files. As you've discovered in your edit, that's not the way the Linux kernel thinks about it. As far as the Linux kernel is concerned, paths are essentially just a into a table of cached `dentries`, which can be used to determine the correct filesystem in the kernel VFS as well as some parentage and inode information for getting to real file data. Even the security systems like SELinux/AppArmor still rely on the filesystems themselves to do the heavy lifting. The security enforcement/domain stuff is stored in the extended attributes of the file, and those are still a part of the inode itself.
null
0
1546122665
False
0
ectxchc
t3_aalc4n
null
null
t1_ectvi8s
/r/programming/comments/aalc4n/windows_file_access_performance_compared_to_linux/ectxchc/
1548240675
10
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
rebel_cdn
t2_4vhqr
I'm not sure we *all* are. I've run into a few developers who seem to be standing on the toes of midgets.
null
0
1546122763
False
0
ectxhc2
t3_aaco1d
null
null
t1_ecrc8q4
/r/programming/comments/aaco1d/things_i_dont_know_as_of_2018/ectxhc2/
1548240734
6
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
skeeto
t2_3em9l
This is C so there is no copy constructor.
null
0
1546122801
False
0
ectxj8e
t3_aajb7r
null
null
t1_ectvvbg
/r/programming/comments/aajb7r/how_doom_fire_was_done/ectxj8e/
1548240758
5
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
SanityInAnarchy
t2_5oygg
It's old enough that I don't think I even had rustup in my path! I'm sure I did the whole `curl ...rustup.sh | sudo sh` thing at some point... I ended up doing: sudo /usr/local/lib/rustlib/uninstall.sh sudo apt install rustc and then I got something a little more reasonable.
null
0
1546122802
False
0
ectxjan
t3_aac4hg
null
null
t1_ectx4lc
/r/programming/comments/aac4hg/modern_c_lamentations/ectxjan/
1548240759
2
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
phillydawg68
t2_19hfy
Perhaps you're just trying to be funny? I can't tell
null
0
1546123246
False
0
ecty5o0
t3_aaoxtq
null
null
t1_ectwdag
/r/programming/comments/aaoxtq/things_i_dont_know_as_of_2018/ecty5o0/
1548241036
3
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
wolveroony
t2_q5ds6
Sorta but not really. I'm not familiar with this developer, and he listed quite a few things.
null
1
1546123321
False
0
ecty9fp
t3_aaoxtq
null
null
t1_ecty5o0
/r/programming/comments/aaoxtq/things_i_dont_know_as_of_2018/ecty9fp/
1548241082
-2
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
Synackaon
t2_4uj1j
TL;DR - the driver we use to connect to Redis rarely fails to reconnect but when it does it’s undebuggable. It’s so undebuggable that driver author has chosen to rip/replace the network implementation in hopes it goes away
null
0
1546123459
False
0
ectyg9x
t3_aagb9j
null
null
t3_aagb9j
/r/programming/comments/aagb9j/redis_connection_issues/ectyg9x/
1548241167
2
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
0x256
t2_tz2g2
This is like a paywall you can click away: It will annoy users, but very few people will actually pay more because of it, because it is too easy to get around. The people willing to pay in a pay-what-you-want model do so because they want to support the developers. With this, it feels like a micro-payment to get rid of a hassle, not to actually appreciate the developers. Many will just pay 0.01$ per app (or add a cronjob) to get updates, and then forget about it. I wouldn't be surprised if the total amount of money payed will actually go down because of the no-free-updates policy (when compared to a simple, low-fee donation button). It just does not feel right anymore. I really hope this is not "Linux world’s best hope for the mainstream" ...
null
0
1546123478
1546123862
0
ectyh7i
t3_aapk53
null
null
t1_ectvfej
/r/programming/comments/aapk53/linux_worlds_best_hope_for_the_mainstream/ectyh7i/
1548241207
3
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
SanityInAnarchy
t2_5oygg
That's definitely prettier (and where'd you find Tuple, or is that just my Triple class?), but feels even clunkier under the hood, when your first step is to box all the ints! I see I never finished my rant... biggest surprise to me was Java streams didn't seem to let me have a different type at the beginning of a map and the end of it. But now I'm confused -- your version compiles, and I'd expect it to complain about flatMap converting a `Stream<Integer>` to `Stream<Triple>`... I went back and read more carefully and, no, they weren't that insane. It's just that `IntStream` is special, and not at all like `Stream<Integer>`, which is why your first step is to box all the ints. Because even in the shiny new Java8 world, primitives are special...
null
0
1546123542
False
0
ectykc1
t3_aac4hg
null
null
t1_ect0rvp
/r/programming/comments/aac4hg/modern_c_lamentations/ectykc1/
1548241247
2
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
yelnatz
t2_37cyh
He’s a core React developer in Facebook. Mainly got famous for making Redux and create-react-app. https://github.com/gaearon
null
0
1546123568
False
0
ectylkc
t3_aaoxtq
null
null
t1_ectwdag
/r/programming/comments/aaoxtq/things_i_dont_know_as_of_2018/ectylkc/
1548241262
11
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
pinnr
t2_qgzhw
Tech has expanded so rapidly that you would expect a small amount of over 50 workers just due to demographics. Even if every tech worker who started in the 80s/90s was still working today, they'd still be a small fraction of all workers, since the number of tech jobs started rapidly increasing in the late 90s.
null
0
1546123599
False
0
ectyn2c
t3_aandti
null
null
t3_aandti
/r/programming/comments/aandti/older_workers_pushed_out_of_work_or_forced_into/ectyn2c/
1548241280
45
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
TheESportsGuy
t2_11v7cn
I love IDEA, but performance isn't one of its strong suits.
null
1
1546123648
False
0
ectypia
t3_aansm3
null
null
t1_ectofsd
/r/programming/comments/aansm3/netbeans_10_released_the_best_swing_gui_builder/ectypia/
1548241311
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
mgostIH
t2_y3ijl
If you come back at revisiting the language, just make sure to reinstall it using Rustup, since cargo is very much needed in current Rust
null
0
1546123821
1546124229
0
ectyyrp
t3_aac4hg
null
null
t1_ectxjan
/r/programming/comments/aac4hg/modern_c_lamentations/ectyyrp/
1548241426
3
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
SanityInAnarchy
t2_5oygg
I had another post where I awkwardly went and reproduced this example in Java and Rust, and of course the author does in C#, and... > ...hiding behind the "zero cost abstraction" mantra, which is a lie because it only cares about runtime optimised performance. Debug performance and compile times affect real world programmers every day. ...absolutely I agree, but Rust alone proves you can have a zero-cost abstraction without insane compile times, and without an insanely slower debug time. Even the Java and C# versions prove you can have this particular abstraction live as much in libraries as it does in C++, without insane compile times. So this isn't a problem with trying to be modern in general, or with whether these features are built into the language or not. It's a problem with *specifically C++* trying to be modern.
null
0
1546124040
False
0
ectza92
t3_aac4hg
null
null
t1_ecrwgep
/r/programming/comments/aac4hg/modern_c_lamentations/ectza92/
1548241568
3
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
pleurplus
t2_radu8
We should fight for a economic system in which thats a good thing.
null
0
1546124458
False
0
ectzuvt
t3_aandti
null
null
t1_ectd3ur
/r/programming/comments/aandti/older_workers_pushed_out_of_work_or_forced_into/ectzuvt/
1548241852
16
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
SanityInAnarchy
t2_5oygg
There is something refreshing about minimalism, but I think Go goes a little too far. People have stopped waiting for generics and have started using reflection (even the standard library does that with `sort.Slice()`), adding their own preprocessors, and even blatantly copy/pasting huge chunks of code. Meanwhile, since generics continues to be *the* top requested feature (ahead of even package management, which Go also sadly lacks), [there's actually a serious proposal for fixing them](https://go.googlesource.com/proposal/+/master/design/go2draft-generics-overview.md). And it's not "blatantly refused" as you suggest: > Many people have concluded (incorrectly) that the Go team’s position is “Go will never have generics.” On the contrary, we understand the potential generics have, both to make Go far more flexible and powerful and to make Go far more complicated. If we are to add generics, we want to do it in a way that gets as much flexibility and power with as little added complexity as possible.
null
0
1546124459
False
0
ectzuy7
t3_aac4hg
null
null
t1_ecsk77p
/r/programming/comments/aac4hg/modern_c_lamentations/ectzuy7/
1548241853
3
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
dapperKillerWhale
t2_dwm2x
Alternative headline: Older workers get to retire early, opening up much-needed jobs for the incoming generation. Am I supposed to feel bad for Boomers?
null
0
1546124624
False
0
ecu02rh
t3_aandti
null
null
t3_aandti
/r/programming/comments/aandti/older_workers_pushed_out_of_work_or_forced_into/ecu02rh/
1548241950
-20
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
Desmeister
t2_6ekcj
It’s cute writing and I like the eastern philosophy theme, but some of these passages escape me
null
0
1546124629
False
0
ecu02zj
t3_aanswd
null
null
t3_aanswd
/r/programming/comments/aanswd/the_tao_of_programming/ecu02zj/
1548241952
9
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
zagginllaykcuf
t2_1zhzr6fo
Yeah nothing but straight up respect right there
null
0
1546124775
False
0
ecu09ns
t3_aajb7r
null
null
t1_ectqcr1
/r/programming/comments/aajb7r/how_doom_fire_was_done/ecu09ns/
1548242034
18
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
[deleted]
None
[deleted]
null
0
1546124796
False
0
ecu0am2
t3_aajb7r
null
null
t1_ectd057
/r/programming/comments/aajb7r/how_doom_fire_was_done/ecu0am2/
1548242046
0
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
duxdude418
t2_4ebnc
At what point is abstraction okay? If you follow your sentiment to its logical conclusion, we should be programming in machine code. Or is that too high level? Let’s get down to the circuitry and gate level. It’s a failing of the tools (language, framework) if the abstraction leaks and requires knowledge under the hood to do it right (e.g. doing things algorithmically efficient). I shouldn’t need to know about the arcane art of quaternions and matrix transforms to do something conceptually unrelatedly like movements and collision detection in 3D space.
null
0
1546124938
False
0
ecu0h2y
t3_aajb7r
null
null
t1_ecsopcl
/r/programming/comments/aajb7r/how_doom_fire_was_done/ecu0h2y/
1548242126
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
day_tripper
t2_3p8mf
I think there are some GenXers over 50 now. So many dont have a retirement fund. You wish to punish them, too?
null
0
1546125121
False
0
ecu0phg
t3_aandti
null
null
t1_ecu02rh
/r/programming/comments/aandti/older_workers_pushed_out_of_work_or_forced_into/ecu0phg/
1548242230
13
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
_kernel_picnic_
t2_17imoh
TLDR: Windows filesystem is slow overengineered piece of crap. And it cannot be fixed because that spaghetti code is spread across multiple subsystems. Despite beeing overengineered, windows still locks open files, which leads to painfully slow windows updates (because windows cannot update files, when they are in use) for example. Not to mention reciently fixed 255 charecter limit for paths (not file names!).
null
1
1546125131
False
0
ecu0pzv
t3_aalc4n
null
null
t3_aalc4n
/r/programming/comments/aalc4n/windows_file_access_performance_compared_to_linux/ecu0pzv/
1548242236
-8
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
gnus-migrate
t2_nvuy8
It's not a performance thing more than it is a code cleanliness thing. Instead of having the data in my record generated in two different places, I can generate it in one place which is simpler to manage in my opinion, again, assuming you have a single client. I had no idea that you could unit test stored procedures though. I personally don't use them because I never really had any queries complex enough to warrant using them, but that was definitely a concern.
null
0
1546125210
False
0
ecu0tm0
t3_a8vpy4
null
null
t1_ectk021
/r/programming/comments/a8vpy4/why_did_we_shift_away_from_databasegenerated_ids/ecu0tm0/
1548242280
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
gaearon
t2_7enqh
I'm literally doing the interviewing. I understand if you disagree but I _do_ check for other things beyond a correct answer (which you can look up on the internet). I'm sorry if your experience was negative.
null
0
1546125258
False
0
ecu0vpz
t3_aaco1d
null
null
t1_ectukc3
/r/programming/comments/aaco1d/things_i_dont_know_as_of_2018/ecu0vpz/
1548242307
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
dapperKillerWhale
t2_dwm2x
I'm not punishing anyone. They had control of the country's direction long before I was even born. They've punished themselves. It turns out rugged individualism and giving companies free reign doesn't actually work so good.
null
0
1546125398
False
0
ecu11yy
t3_aandti
null
null
t1_ecu0phg
/r/programming/comments/aandti/older_workers_pushed_out_of_work_or_forced_into/ecu11yy/
1548242414
-11
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
LeeHide
t2_tqbvo
Games come in so many different variants that trying to make an engine that can do every style without giving the creators of the game the possiblity to change stuff is limiting. Abstraction is great, but with something like a game, where performance is key and optimization can differ extremely (just compare a voxel-game with a space physics simulator), I feel like the developers should have the option to access a lover level of the engine. You are saying all that so laughingly, but you know that parts of those engines have been programmed in assembler, for example, to get the best performance, right? Yes, I think a good developer should be able to use both high abstraction level languages and low level ones, simply because programming anything in games is an area of programming where you have to know a lot to make it work correctly. So yes, ideally we would be programming in machine code, but that's impractical, so we abstract away parts that we do not need to manipulate on such a low level, but we keep the vital parts low level in order to make sure that our program is kept fast and safe. So, to answer your question, abstraction is needed when it's convenient, but not when it's not. Not a satisfying answer, maybe, but I feel like it's not a very qualified question anyways. Edit: Also, you will be writing your own game still, you still need to know how to make a game, you just start with an engine. Unless you're making an asset flip, of course.
null
0
1546125400
1546125863
0
ecu122c
t3_aajb7r
null
null
t1_ecu0h2y
/r/programming/comments/aajb7r/how_doom_fire_was_done/ecu122c/
1548242415
-1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
SanityInAnarchy
t2_5oygg
In fact, cargo was installed as a dependency of rustc. I'm sure I'll come back from time to time, but I'm not sure how long I'll stay. In theory, I love everything about Rust, including the borrow checker. In practice, the most frustrating thing about Rust is the borrow checker -- it's not just that you sometimes have to fight with it, it's that you don't always win that fight, and it's not at all obvious from the start if the problem is simple (took me forever to figure out I needed a "move lambda"), or if you need to restructure your entire program. Sometimes, you end up with a snippet of code that looks fine to you, and would work fine in any other high-level language, but there's no way to adequately express the lifetimes of everything involved. Or, at least, no way I could figure out. And I found that the more I played with it, the less I'd fight with the borrow checker, but the more likely it was that when I did fight, I'd have to completely restructure everything to fix it. So I got better at avoiding really stupid bugs that probably would've been serious problems in C++, but I didn't get any better at anticipating either real structural problems in my program, or just designs that the borrow checker wouldn't be smart enough to figure out. But I'm sure things have gotten better, and maybe I've gotten better, too? I'm sure I'll give it another shot sometime.
null
0
1546125634
False
0
ecu1cm9
t3_aac4hg
null
null
t1_ectyyrp
/r/programming/comments/aac4hg/modern_c_lamentations/ecu1cm9/
1548242547
3
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
LeeHide
t2_tqbvo
No, you cannot. If you write code that is not good, that is not maintainable, you are ultimately dooming your project and making sure it's stuck in 'Early Access' for ever.
null
0
1546125670
False
0
ecu1ea0
t3_aajb7r
null
null
t1_ectlvxv
/r/programming/comments/aajb7r/how_doom_fire_was_done/ecu1ea0/
1548242569
-3
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
wkoorts
t2_3k6hc
Yeah don't worry too much about it. I'd hire an older developer over a younger one in a heartbeat.
null
0
1546125735
False
0
ecu1h91
t3_aandti
null
null
t1_ectrbng
/r/programming/comments/aandti/older_workers_pushed_out_of_work_or_forced_into/ecu1h91/
1548242607
9
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
LeeHide
t2_tqbvo
Also, you understand what's happening. For example when you game starts getting big fps drops every now and then, its incredibly helpful to know more than just how to write a script in unity.
null
0
1546125760
False
0
ecu1idi
t3_aajb7r
null
null
t1_ecssgud
/r/programming/comments/aajb7r/how_doom_fire_was_done/ecu1idi/
1548242621
2
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
matthaywardwebdesign
t2_g6qh7
Thanks! I'm being trying to find ways (I'm sure this is some), but it's a step in the right direction I suppose. At the moment there isn't a way to list what dependencies your packages are accessing, however it's definitely something I'm looking at adding.
null
0
1546125810
False
0
ecu1kjm
t3_aakn4q
null
null
t1_ectmfee
/r/programming/comments/aakn4q/introducing_nodesecurity_the_easiest_way_to/ecu1kjm/
1548242649
3
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
wkoorts
t2_3k6hc
That was the joke ;-)
null
0
1546126049
False
0
ecu1uza
t3_aansm3
null
null
t1_ectp99q
/r/programming/comments/aansm3/netbeans_10_released_the_best_swing_gui_builder/ecu1uza/
1548242777
13
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
gaearon
t2_7enqh
I'd say my primary area of expertise is related to client-side JS ecosystem and build tooling but that sounds a bit too limiting. I'll think about this question more.
null
0
1546126057
False
0
ecu1vcj
t3_aaoxtq
null
null
t1_ecty9fp
/r/programming/comments/aaoxtq/things_i_dont_know_as_of_2018/ecu1vcj/
1548242782
7
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
HellfireOwner
t2_2juz5fhu
That's what I'm trying to do, gent. But, the populace is completely oblivious to the war being waged behind the scenes...
null
1
1546126062
False
0
ecu1vk1
t3_aandti
null
null
t1_ectzuvt
/r/programming/comments/aandti/older_workers_pushed_out_of_work_or_forced_into/ecu1vk1/
1548242785
-4
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
tonefart
t2_ywdx0
Should've stuck with JAVAFX instead!!! Thankfully there's scenebuilder
null
0
1546126069
False
0
ecu1vvs
t3_aansm3
null
null
t3_aansm3
/r/programming/comments/aansm3/netbeans_10_released_the_best_swing_gui_builder/ecu1vvs/
1548242789
6
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
wolveroony
t2_q5ds6
:O
null
1
1546126139
False
0
ecu1z2d
t3_aaoxtq
null
null
t1_ecu1vcj
/r/programming/comments/aaoxtq/things_i_dont_know_as_of_2018/ecu1z2d/
1548242828
3
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
BufferUnderpants
t2_3yu33
Swing's API fucking sucks. Between not making its mind up on whether it is parent components that receive the child components or vice-versa, components more complex than a button require convoluted subclassing for [the contents of the widget](https://docs.oracle.com/javase/tutorial/uiswing/components/table.html), or the non-existence of any specialized component like a goddamned numeric input, requiring you to imperatively subclass and instantiate formatters or models for every damned thing. And to this day there's no calendar datepicker.
null
0
1546126334
False
0
ecu27sx
t3_aansm3
null
null
t1_ectmxug
/r/programming/comments/aansm3/netbeans_10_released_the_best_swing_gui_builder/ecu27sx/
1548242936
14
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
BadGoyWithAGun
t2_l2l3h
I too wish to be paid for breathing.
null
1
1546126404
False
0
ecu2b53
t3_aandti
null
null
t1_ectzuvt
/r/programming/comments/aandti/older_workers_pushed_out_of_work_or_forced_into/ecu2b53/
1548242977
-7
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
pleurplus
t2_radu8
It's not behind the scenes. And people can be smarter than we think. When they are pressured enough they always survive. Look at france.
null
1
1546126488
False
0
ecu2euw
t3_aandti
null
null
t1_ecu1vk1
/r/programming/comments/aandti/older_workers_pushed_out_of_work_or_forced_into/ecu2euw/
1548243046
4
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
pleurplus
t2_radu8
Just inherit a trust fund.
null
0
1546126557
False
0
ecu2hzn
t3_aandti
null
null
t1_ecu2b53
/r/programming/comments/aandti/older_workers_pushed_out_of_work_or_forced_into/ecu2hzn/
1548243085
24
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
o11c
t2_fjay8
TL;DR Windows uses FUSE for everything.
null
1
1546126586
False
0
ecu2jar
t3_aalc4n
null
null
t3_aalc4n
/r/programming/comments/aalc4n/windows_file_access_performance_compared_to_linux/ecu2jar/
1548243101
4
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
vattenpuss
t2_brzia
That role is surely quite small. To me the awful Windows file system performance is most notable when working on programming projects with many files. Regardless of using gradle, sbt, or yarn, using the Windows tools from the Windows command line or some quasi posix tools from msysgit is always much slower than using a random linux virtual machine for all development needs. Heck, running Docker inside a VM to run containers is quicker than in Windows. If we were not building Windows games, I would have zero reason to boot Windows at all at work. It is mostly in the way when trying to get work done, to a frustrating degree.
null
0
1546126598
False
0
ecu2jt7
t3_aalc4n
null
null
t1_ect3s9f
/r/programming/comments/aalc4n/windows_file_access_performance_compared_to_linux/ecu2jt7/
1548243107
17
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null