archived stringclasses 2 values | author stringlengths 3 20 | author_fullname stringlengths 4 12 ⌀ | body stringlengths 0 22.5k | comment_type stringclasses 1 value | controversiality stringclasses 2 values | created_utc stringlengths 10 10 | edited stringlengths 4 12 | gilded stringclasses 7 values | id stringlengths 1 7 | link_id stringlengths 7 10 | locked stringclasses 2 values | name stringlengths 4 10 ⌀ | parent_id stringlengths 5 10 | permalink stringlengths 41 91 ⌀ | retrieved_on stringlengths 10 10 ⌀ | score stringlengths 1 4 | subreddit_id stringclasses 1 value | subreddit_name_prefixed stringclasses 1 value | subreddit_type stringclasses 1 value | total_awards_received stringclasses 19 values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
False | twp | t2_1o6k | This is now implemented in [https://github.com/twpayne/chezmoi/pull/71](https://github.com/twpayne/chezmoi/pull/71). | null | 0 | 1544726547 | False | 0 | ebpq1jd | t3_9zss15 | null | null | t1_eae4kyj | /r/programming/comments/9zss15/chezmoi_a_tool_for_managing_your_dotfiles_across/ebpq1jd/ | 1547563328 | 2 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | foonathan | t2_mkwxe | They don't?
If you make it a template they give you even *less* overhead than a function pointer. | null | 0 | 1546037525 | False | 0 | ecrij8o | t3_aac4hg | null | null | t1_ecrhfk6 | /r/programming/comments/aac4hg/modern_c_lamentations/ecrij8o/ | 1548200079 | 38 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | PC__LOAD__LETTER | t2_pgt8t | The shell is a place where you glue a bunch of different tools/processes together. That’s the Unix way. If you’re nervous about performance, write an actual program in an actual programming language where you have tighter control over exactly what’s happening.
There’s a big difference between a shell one-liner and a custom program.
Who’s arguing for the sake of arguing again? | null | 0 | 1544726717 | False | 0 | ebpqa8o | t3_a5sg9k | null | null | t1_ebplck4 | /r/programming/comments/a5sg9k/how_unix_programmers_at_restaurants_search_menus/ebpqa8o/ | 1547563436 | 4 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | Ari_Rahikkala | t2_24aj1 | Because there's an implied requirement that people have more or less just been assuming in these posts: The generator code shouldn't have to know anything about when to stop generating triples; and making it independent of this detail should make the code *simpler* rather than more complex.
Any programmer could parametrize the code over things like what to do with the triples (as yours does) and the stop condition (yours doesn't - what if someone wanted to stop generating when they see the first triple that sums to over 10000 for instance - but I'm sure you would be capable of adding support for that). The question is how to design the language so that these conceptual simplifications actually end up as simpler code, too. | null | 0 | 1546037539 | False | 0 | ecrijxr | t3_aac4hg | null | null | t1_ecqzdk3 | /r/programming/comments/aac4hg/modern_c_lamentations/ecrijxr/ | 1548200088 | 18 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | ahsansaeed067 | t2_v8rwoio | According to [Oracle](https://docs.oracle.com/en/) documentation on **ZGC**.
>The **ZGC** performs all expensive work concurrently, without stopping the execution of application threads for more than 10ms, which makes is suitable for applications which require low latency and/or use a very large heap (multi-terabytes).
​ | null | 0 | 1544726723 | False | 0 | ebpqaj4 | t3_a5umpk | null | null | t1_ebponqg | /r/programming/comments/a5umpk/10_new_features_in_java_11/ebpqaj4/ | 1547563440 | 1 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | OneWingedShark | t2_bx7wh | >Not when we worship complexity -
It's not really the complexity, but the advice of "*everything should be as simple as possible, but no simpler*" has been egregiously violated in the case of C and C++, although you **could** make the argument that (e.g.) C is a multi-platform high-level assembler... which in turn illustrates the *exact* point I'm making: the languages C & C++ are unsuitable for general programming, especially given the prevalence of things like multi-core system and multi-tasking.
Another good example of a violation is Go and its error-handling: the forced error-codes / lack-of-exceptions forces the code to be longer, more complex, more error-prone, and therefore less maintainable.
A good example of keeping it as simple as possible, though still requiring complexity, would be Ada's `Task` construct, where one can decompose executable subsections by logical-function (ie a graphics Task, a sound Task, and a user-input Task all as subcomponents to a game.) | null | 0 | 1546037578 | False | 0 | ecrilpx | t3_aaa8y7 | null | null | t1_ecrapsk | /r/programming/comments/aaa8y7/taming_the_chaos_can_we_build_systems_that/ecrilpx/ | 1548200110 | 1 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | NeverComments | t2_4r1xy | >However, Kotlin is part of the Java world and so you can't get completely away from the 'everything should be solved using objects' approach.
This seems like a weird point to argue in defense of Dart, which takes "everything should be solved using objects" to its logical extreme:
>[Everything you can place in a variable is an object, and every object is an instance of a class. Even numbers, functions, and null are objects. All objects inherit from the Object class.](https://www.dartlang.org/guides/language/language-tour)
| null | 0 | 1544726771 | False | 0 | ebpqcxe | t3_a5ikq1 | null | null | t1_ebppsms | /r/programming/comments/a5ikq1/fuchsia_sdk_is_now_included_into_android_open/ebpqcxe/ | 1547563469 | 1 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | OneWingedShark | t2_bx7wh | >I switched to using other languages. Mostly D nowadays.
Ada here. | null | 0 | 1546037645 | False | 0 | ecrioy5 | t3_aac4hg | null | null | t1_ecrcsch | /r/programming/comments/aac4hg/modern_c_lamentations/ecrioy5/ | 1548200150 | 11 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | MrDOS | t2_43dri | One could argue that the ones who know how to use it “properly” are the ones being most malicious with it. | null | 0 | 1544726965 | False | 0 | ebpqmnk | t3_a5q9y8 | null | null | t1_ebp9jd2 | /r/programming/comments/a5q9y8/blockevil_a_userscript_that_denies_callback/ebpqmnk/ | 1547563589 | 12 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | foonathan | t2_mkwxe | I'm the author of tiny, and your description is not really fair.
A lot of the techniques like using alignment bits of pointers, or tombstones, have precedent in existing projects (like LLVM). It's not like nobody needs it. | null | 0 | 1546037725 | False | 0 | ecrisqq | t3_aac4hg | null | null | t1_ecr8mp6 | /r/programming/comments/aac4hg/modern_c_lamentations/ecrisqq/ | 1548200196 | 39 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | Zakman-- | t2_is8um | If you've kept up with Blazor then you'll know about the client-side version which runs on WASM and how they've built on top of Razor to create a full UI framework, so the work to create this was pretty much done since they found it was trivial to run the UI on the server (which is what this is - Razor Components) instead of the browser. The massive benefit to this is they can continue to build on the UI framework while not having to wait for WASM to mature or for Mono-to-WASM compilation to mature. Once the two have matured then they can use the work they've done to the UI framework via Razor Components and apply that to the client-side version since Razor Components will be built to work exactly the same as Blazor.
It all makes a lot more sense if you've been following the project from the beginning and understand which parts are independent. If you were to create an application using Razor Components as if it were running in the browser then all you need to do to have it actually run on the browser is change a couple of lines of code.
There are benefits to running all this on the server. You get full .NET Core functionality (including full debugging), initial page load is extremely quick since you're not shipping Mono to the browser and there are a couple of other benefits as well. /u/eldamir88 and /u/chucker23n have explained the benefits in full. | null | 0 | 1544727014 | 1544727320 | 0 | ebpqp09 | t3_a5ssxk | null | null | t1_ebpmzvn | /r/programming/comments/a5ssxk/razor_components_for_a_javascriptfree_frontend_in/ebpqp09/ | 1547563618 | 6 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | theycallmemorty | t2_1wl5 | This made me wonder what kind of questions Dan has asked on Stackoverflow.
Here is a post from 2014 where he's trying to figure out how flux works: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/23591325/in-flux-architecture-how-do-you-manage-store-lifecycle | null | 0 | 1546037730 | False | 0 | ecrisyr | t3_aaco1d | null | null | t3_aaco1d | /r/programming/comments/aaco1d/things_i_dont_know_as_of_2018/ecrisyr/ | 1548200199 | 23 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | justinacolmena | t2_2jp7g9hl | Unix programmers at a restaurant? Absolutely not! The waitresses refuse to serve Unix. They're looking for a more manly man.
Unix programmers just have to get off the restaurant property before they get arrested by the waitress's boyfriend and compile their meals at home in the kitchen and make build them in the oven. | null | 0 | 1544727071 | False | 0 | ebpqrtb | t3_a5sg9k | null | null | t3_a5sg9k | /r/programming/comments/a5sg9k/how_unix_programmers_at_restaurants_search_menus/ebpqrtb/ | 1547563653 | -4 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | [deleted] | None | [deleted] | null | 1 | 1546037830 | False | 0 | ecrixko | t3_aac4hg | null | null | t3_aac4hg | /r/programming/comments/aac4hg/modern_c_lamentations/ecrixko/ | 1548200256 | 3 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | Gotebe | t2_2y75 | Doesn't matter. Powershell lets me think in data structure, not in text parsing, terms. This is where it shines over Unix shell. | null | 0 | 1544727306 | False | 0 | ebpr340 | t3_a5sg9k | null | null | t1_ebp8vrm | /r/programming/comments/a5sg9k/how_unix_programmers_at_restaurants_search_menus/ebpr340/ | 1547563820 | 8 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | SaphirShroom | t2_ogov5 | Git could have been written in literally any language that can produce binaries. | null | 0 | 1546037858 | False | 0 | ecriyyd | t3_aa3qdm | null | null | t1_ecq3esy | /r/programming/comments/aa3qdm/please_do_not_attempt_to_simplify_this_code_keep/ecriyyd/ | 1548200273 | 3 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | BadLuckLottery | t2_bpf9m | >You still need some way to weed out the people who are not technically able to do the job.
Yup, if there's money to be made, fakers will exist. You'll get candidates with BS + MS/PhD or 5+ years in industry who still can't write a simple recursive function or even sometimes a working for loop. I'm sure their soft skills are great (because how else did they get this far) but you also need to be able to write at least *basic* code on occasion without resorting to copy/pasting from Stack Overflow. | null | 0 | 1544727309 | False | 0 | ebpr39w | t3_a5u9z0 | null | null | t1_ebpeq3q | /r/programming/comments/a5u9z0/cs_interviews_and_how_they_can_become_unbroken/ebpr39w/ | 1547563822 | 3 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | ArkyBeagle | t2_r4aik | > Rather simplicity which is often brought with abstractions, which can make the entire system complex.
We all know what you mean but seeing it written out like that, I have to wonder...
I call some ideas "based in the general cybernetic fallacy", in which we reach too quickly for computer solutions. | null | 0 | 1546037891 | False | 0 | ecrj0ib | t3_aaa8y7 | null | null | t1_ecresw5 | /r/programming/comments/aaa8y7/taming_the_chaos_can_we_build_systems_that/ecrj0ib/ | 1548200292 | 1 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | ahsansaeed067 | t2_v8rwoio | That's becuase of code editor plugin. | null | 0 | 1544727365 | False | 0 | ebpr5wn | t3_a5umpk | null | null | t1_ebppk50 | /r/programming/comments/a5umpk/10_new_features_in_java_11/ebpr5wn/ | 1547563854 | -11 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | JehovahsNutsac | t2_b4pdxfg | Paradox if I was being sarcastic? Chill. | null | 0 | 1546037926 | False | 0 | ecrj22p | t3_aa91bp | null | null | t1_ecqm4gq | /r/programming/comments/aa91bp/computer_vision_ai_object_detection_and/ecrj22p/ | 1548200312 | 1 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | CameronNemo | t2_91j1q | You're right, they don't offer overlayfs for snapshots or thin copies. They seem to prefer ZFS, btrfs, and LVM because they support inotify events (according to this [bug](https://github.com/lxc/lxd/issues/1068)). | null | 0 | 1544727800 | False | 0 | ebprqoh | t3_a5suza | null | null | t1_ebpokue | /r/programming/comments/a5suza/lxd_38_has_been_released/ebprqoh/ | 1547564112 | 1 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | chugga_fan | t2_raasi | https://twitter.com/maxheckel/status/877636200026079233
Found it. | null | 0 | 1546037949 | False | 0 | ecrj349 | t3_aa3qdm | null | null | t1_ecr1y81 | /r/programming/comments/aa3qdm/please_do_not_attempt_to_simplify_this_code_keep/ecrj349/ | 1548200325 | 5 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | yaarra | t2_5shvw | a.k.a. a Pipe Dream | null | 0 | 1544727903 | False | 0 | ebprvky | t3_a5sg9k | null | null | t1_ebpbetl | /r/programming/comments/a5sg9k/how_unix_programmers_at_restaurants_search_menus/ebprvky/ | 1547564172 | 5 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | 404_Identity | t2_zycap | function cd
set -l target $argv[1]
if [ -l $target ]
set target (realpath $target)
end
builtin cd $target
end | null | 0 | 1546037967 | False | 0 | ecrj3zx | t3_aabai1 | null | null | t1_ecqustb | /r/programming/comments/aabai1/fish_shell_30/ecrj3zx/ | 1548200335 | 15 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | CameronNemo | t2_91j1q | > grep '__asm' src/*
I think you mean `grep -r '__asm' src`. Unless you really want to avoid searching hidden files. | null | 0 | 1544727953 | False | 0 | ebpry0s | t3_a5sg9k | null | null | t1_ebpkiab | /r/programming/comments/a5sg9k/how_unix_programmers_at_restaurants_search_menus/ebpry0s/ | 1547564202 | 0 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | andynocandy | t2_nfb81 | Do you have an example/article that goes a bit more in-depth re: your approach? | null | 0 | 1546038051 | False | 0 | ecrj7ux | t3_aacv7i | null | null | t1_ecr90ca | /r/programming/comments/aacv7i/softwarearch_using_interfaces_and_dependency/ecrj7ux/ | 1548200412 | 3 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | pts_ | t2_15nnm0 | Retailers do. | null | 0 | 1544728044 | False | 0 | ebps2im | t3_a5i57x | null | null | t1_ebppv2y | /r/programming/comments/a5i57x/the_rise_of_microsoft_visual_studio_code/ebps2im/ | 1547564258 | 1 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | SaphirShroom | t2_ogov5 | Don't bother, people do everything in their power to cram their favourite language into places it's not meant to be used in. | null | 0 | 1546038112 | False | 0 | ecrjap1 | t3_aa3qdm | null | null | t1_ecp2310 | /r/programming/comments/aa3qdm/please_do_not_attempt_to_simplify_this_code_keep/ecrjap1/ | 1548200447 | 3 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | stdio-lib | t2_2cscos | UUOC is the stupidest thing to ever gain traction amongst intelligent people. | null | 0 | 1544728226 | False | 0 | ebpsbjg | t3_a5sg9k | null | null | t1_ebox6vg | /r/programming/comments/a5sg9k/how_unix_programmers_at_restaurants_search_menus/ebpsbjg/ | 1547564369 | 0 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | pure_x01 | t2_3h5id | There have been sttenpts to port it but the c git is the more popular because its fast and vunerabillities have been sorted out | null | 0 | 1546038127 | False | 0 | ecrjbdk | t3_aa3qdm | null | null | t1_ecriyyd | /r/programming/comments/aa3qdm/please_do_not_attempt_to_simplify_this_code_keep/ecrjbdk/ | 1548200456 | 1 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | okiyama | t2_3grmr | This answer, though funny really underpins one of the fundamental problems with SO. The question was very specific in what it wanted to accomplish and the top answer is a huge paragraph about how "just don't do that".
The second answer is the correct one. It acknowledges "dude really don't do this, but if the problem you're solving really is this narrow then here's how you do it." | null | 0 | 1544728260 | False | 0 | ebpsd97 | t3_a5sg9k | null | null | t1_ebp2r8k | /r/programming/comments/a5sg9k/how_unix_programmers_at_restaurants_search_menus/ebpsd97/ | 1547564419 | 12 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | chugga_fan | t2_raasi | > The most cited example for this would be generics.
[Sure it does if you want it to!](https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/5penft/parallelizing_enjarify_in_go_and_rust/) | null | 0 | 1546038213 | False | 0 | ecrjfhq | t3_aa3qdm | null | null | t1_ecqaoej | /r/programming/comments/aa3qdm/please_do_not_attempt_to_simplify_this_code_keep/ecrjfhq/ | 1548200508 | 6 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | shevegen | t2_atqp | I just use Ruby and be done with it. | null | 0 | 1544728321 | False | 0 | ebpsgdl | t3_a5sg9k | null | null | t3_a5sg9k | /r/programming/comments/a5sg9k/how_unix_programmers_at_restaurants_search_menus/ebpsgdl/ | 1547564458 | -2 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | palordrolap | t2_4i86m | Then why bother with C++ syntax at all? The template mechanism is Turing-complete, right?
(This is weird. *I* can't tell if I'm joking or not.) | null | 0 | 1546038321 | False | 0 | ecrjkf4 | t3_aac4hg | null | null | t1_ecr5fk0 | /r/programming/comments/aac4hg/modern_c_lamentations/ecrjkf4/ | 1548200568 | 36 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | shevegen | t2_atqp | Good thing that ruby and python obsoleted this archaic use of awk. | null | 0 | 1544728342 | False | 0 | ebpshg6 | t3_a5sg9k | null | null | t1_eboxlib | /r/programming/comments/a5sg9k/how_unix_programmers_at_restaurants_search_menus/ebpshg6/ | 1547564472 | 3 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | [deleted] | None | [deleted] | null | 1 | 1546038336 | False | 0 | ecrjl4q | t3_aafep8 | null | null | t3_aafep8 | /r/programming/comments/aafep8/a_history_of_artificial_intelligence/ecrjl4q/ | 1548200577 | 2 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | shevegen | t2_atqp | This pipe has come to an end. | null | 0 | 1544728368 | False | 0 | ebpsiq4 | t3_a5sg9k | null | null | t1_ebp4jea | /r/programming/comments/a5sg9k/how_unix_programmers_at_restaurants_search_menus/ebpsiq4/ | 1547564487 | 3 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | __pg_ | t2_rcy9eog | Compile times and code bloat matter too. | null | 0 | 1546038384 | False | 0 | ecrjnc7 | t3_aac4hg | null | null | t1_ecrij8o | /r/programming/comments/aac4hg/modern_c_lamentations/ecrjnc7/ | 1548200605 | 25 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | shevegen | t2_atqp | How awful.
How can you people waste your life with such an ugly syntax? | null | 1 | 1544728403 | False | 0 | ebpskib | t3_a5sg9k | null | null | t1_eboxzup | /r/programming/comments/a5sg9k/how_unix_programmers_at_restaurants_search_menus/ebpskib/ | 1547564509 | 0 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | StudentHwale | t2_23mldw4r | Yeah wasn't specifically talking about you but more about the people who need an '/s' everywhere. But excuse me for the rude language. | null | 0 | 1546038424 | False | 0 | ecrjp5z | t3_aa91bp | null | null | t1_ecrj22p | /r/programming/comments/aa91bp/computer_vision_ai_object_detection_and/ecrjp5z/ | 1548200627 | 1 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | shevegen | t2_atqp | I understand this line of thinking.
For me ruby replaced all the classical UNIX tools when it comes to data manipulation, excluding when speed is really absolutely necessary. | null | 0 | 1544728436 | False | 0 | ebpsm66 | t3_a5sg9k | null | null | t1_ebp3hdx | /r/programming/comments/a5sg9k/how_unix_programmers_at_restaurants_search_menus/ebpsm66/ | 1547564530 | 1 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | bloody-albatross | t2_cdjk3 | Arrays and vectors and matrices. Like you can write a math library that is generic over all sizes of matrices and still checks at compile time if a certain operation between two matrices is allowed (they must have compatible sizes) using const generics. (There are such libraries in C++.) And having these sizes as compiletime constants the compiler can do certain optimizations it can't do with dynamically sized arrays (like loop unrolling). | null | 0 | 1546038444 | False | 0 | ecrjq2n | t3_a9zyp3 | null | null | t1_ecppemn | /r/programming/comments/a9zyp3/thoughts_on_rust_in_2019/ecrjq2n/ | 1548200638 | 2 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | emn13 | t2_1p64 | > Who’s arguing for the sake of arguing again?
I'm pretty sure I'd argue that we all are. Though I still have a lively internal debate on the matter. | null | 0 | 1544728503 | False | 0 | ebpspj6 | t3_a5sg9k | null | null | t1_ebpqa8o | /r/programming/comments/a5sg9k/how_unix_programmers_at_restaurants_search_menus/ebpspj6/ | 1547564572 | 2 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | HappyDoggo437793 | t2_2qwtj2ov | >either because reviewers didn't know what they were, or they were concerned that other programmers on the team wouldn't know what they were.
I really don't get why that doesn't cause people to learn something, but blocks others from using features. It's crazy | null | 0 | 1546038560 | False | 0 | ecrjvi5 | t3_aac4hg | null | null | t1_ecr0f3z | /r/programming/comments/aac4hg/modern_c_lamentations/ecrjvi5/ | 1548200705 | 18 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | deceased_parrot | t2_7q7zg | I don't doubt there are benefits. I just don't see how any of these benefits overcome the latency of running back and forth between the server and the browser. | null | 0 | 1544728534 | False | 0 | ebpsr3l | t3_a5ssxk | null | null | t1_ebpqp09 | /r/programming/comments/a5ssxk/razor_components_for_a_javascriptfree_frontend_in/ebpsr3l/ | 1547564590 | 1 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | Zephirdd | t2_5yhdf | I mean, as far as I know you can't use `var` on a type that can't be inferred.
Conversely, you might as well use `Object` and cast stuff everywhere, it's the same thing in Java. | null | 0 | 1546038563 | False | 0 | ecrjvmu | t3_aac4hg | null | null | t1_ecrhnrt | /r/programming/comments/aac4hg/modern_c_lamentations/ecrjvmu/ | 1548200707 | 12 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | shevegen | t2_atqp | Blind hackers are great. I'd get depressed being physically handicapped. | null | 1 | 1544728546 | False | 0 | ebpsrnu | t3_a5u5dc | null | null | t3_a5u5dc | /r/programming/comments/a5u5dc/helping_blind_people_learn_to_code/ebpsrnu/ | 1547564597 | -2 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | millenix | t2_304y6 | One point that gets missed in a lot of engineering discussion is that large swathes of what would be considered 'interesting' software is the *First Of A Kind* in the engineering jargon sense. Every building or bridge is unique, but principles from the ones before, and from all the incorporated materials and components, transfer over. With new software systems, only the barest of general 'category of system' knowledge and experience is really transferable. | null | 0 | 1546038577 | False | 0 | ecrjwav | t3_aac063 | null | null | t3_aac063 | /r/programming/comments/aac063/when_good_engineers_write_bad_software/ecrjwav/ | 1548200715 | 5 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | fkeeal | t2_4p2tx | The main issue with coding is that it is a competence (the application of many skills including the ability to think and turn abstract thought into logic for a machine). Not testing coding skills would be akin to hiring a truck driver without first checking that they have the required driver's license.
If the writer of the post really wants to do away with needing to write code in every interview, then the programming community at large would have to establish some sort of standardized test that if passed would yield a "license to write code". Then, having a license would already validate your competence at coding, and interviews could become purely about experiences and other factors. | null | 0 | 1544728557 | False | 0 | ebpss7x | t3_a5u9z0 | null | null | t3_a5u9z0 | /r/programming/comments/a5u9z0/cs_interviews_and_how_they_can_become_unbroken/ebpss7x/ | 1547564604 | 1 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | pcjftw | t2_s53vc6n | take a read of this:
https://www.humanbrainproject.eu/en/brain-simulation/
> Current computer power is insufficient to model a entire human brain at this level of interconnectedness. **A simpler approach has thus been adopted to produce results that are increasingly close approximations to experimental data**
Is it actual complexity or scale?
Both | null | 0 | 1546038702 | 1546039074 | 0 | ecrk243 | t3_aa91bp | null | null | t1_ecr51w8 | /r/programming/comments/aa91bp/computer_vision_ai_object_detection_and/ecrk243/ | 1548200787 | 1 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | shevegen | t2_atqp | Well, what did you expect - this is Java. | null | 0 | 1544728571 | False | 0 | ebpssy5 | t3_a5umpk | null | null | t1_ebpjp8p | /r/programming/comments/a5umpk/10_new_features_in_java_11/ebpssy5/ | 1547564613 | -17 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | jcelerier | t2_nju89 | > Then why bother with C++ syntax at all? The template mechanism is Turing-complete, right?
well... that's the point. The actual job of a C++ programmer is to write his own domain-specific languages so that the problems at hand can be best expressed, while retaining type safety and maximal runtime performance - see Eigen, Boost.Spirit, etc... the only alternative is to write your own compiler ; C++ allows to only write the "easy" parts of the compiler (e.g. targetting the C++ abstract machine) and leave the codegen to the compiler binary. | null | 0 | 1546038851 | False | 0 | ecrk909 | t3_aac4hg | null | null | t1_ecrjkf4 | /r/programming/comments/aac4hg/modern_c_lamentations/ecrk909/ | 1548200872 | 23 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | shevegen | t2_atqp | Careful - lots of java users here downvoting. | null | 0 | 1544728596 | False | 0 | ebpsu6c | t3_a5umpk | null | null | t1_ebpptwj | /r/programming/comments/a5umpk/10_new_features_in_java_11/ebpsu6c/ | 1547564628 | -25 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | Sarcon5673 | t2_ebelr | no u | null | 0 | 1546038897 | False | 0 | ecrkb6p | t3_a9evav | null | null | t1_ecitxhj | /r/programming/comments/a9evav/using_oop_principles_beyond_objects/ecrkb6p/ | 1548200898 | 1 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | emn13 | t2_1p64 | Good point! | null | 0 | 1544728602 | False | 0 | ebpsuio | t3_a5sg9k | null | null | t1_ebplhxh | /r/programming/comments/a5sg9k/how_unix_programmers_at_restaurants_search_menus/ebpsuio/ | 1547564632 | 1 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | Drisku11 | t2_bg6v5 | From what I can tell, combinatorylogic's assholeishness is directly proportional to how confidently wrong the posts he replies to are (well, maybe exponentially proportional). I haven't seen him be an asshole toward people who ask honest questions, and in fact he's given some good answers to people that ask for them. | null | 0 | 1546038927 | False | 0 | ecrkcks | t3_aaco1d | null | null | t1_ecrc7u0 | /r/programming/comments/aaco1d/things_i_dont_know_as_of_2018/ecrkcks/ | 1548200915 | 21 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | SanityInAnarchy | t2_5oygg | My university did force students to learn a *little* bit of VCS -- the group project had to be turned in via SVN, and IIRC they did actually look at commit/blame history and grade you on using SVN properly. But total instructional time was, like, one day in the middle of a course that was mostly about group projects, and that was a course that comes pretty late.
So it's not that we didn't get *any* training on VCS, it's that the amount you get is too little, too late. | null | 0 | 1544728947 | False | 0 | ebptbsr | t3_a5hkyo | null | null | t1_ebp0p6w | /r/programming/comments/a5hkyo/investigating_an_early2010s_gaming_drm_system_or/ebptbsr/ | 1547564846 | 0 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | flyingjam | t2_8n6t9 | Go and C++ aren't really in the same field, though. For areas where C/C++ is used today, like where real-time latency is important, or embedded systems, or systems level code that has to interface closely with hardware, Go is really not an appropriate choice.
Go more directly competes with languages like C# or Java.
There's no doubt that C++ has a lot of cruft. But then again, a lot of that is in move semantics, smart pointers, and so forth which will never be even included in a language with a GC. | null | 0 | 1546038935 | False | 0 | ecrkcym | t3_aac4hg | null | null | t1_ecrixko | /r/programming/comments/aac4hg/modern_c_lamentations/ecrkcym/ | 1548200920 | 29 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | panorambo | t2_nv5sw | There is this obscure data query language called Structured Query Language which is designed to do these things:
`select title, price from menu where price < 10` | null | 0 | 1544729028 | False | 0 | ebptg02 | t3_a5sg9k | null | null | t3_a5sg9k | /r/programming/comments/a5sg9k/how_unix_programmers_at_restaurants_search_menus/ebptg02/ | 1547564899 | 5 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | OneWingedShark | t2_bx7wh | I found this section interesting:
>**S.C.: How does that split manifest in terms of the actual code that gets written?**
>
>**A.B.:** There’s a difference between small pieces of software and large pieces of software. Small being what you do in school, working with one or two people on some project. Large software is what industry makes, which is worked on by multiple people, and most importantly not necessarily by the same people over its lifetime.... They’re really very different in what you have to do. So people get to industry, and all these things like maintainability, readability, securability, manageability—they haven’t learned any of that and have to reinvent it.... Companies like IBM had been studying this in the ’70s, and had made some progress on turning software into an engineering discipline. That essentially all got thrown away. The invasion of people \[during the personal computer revolution\], from Bill Gates on down, basically ignored everything that came before them.
That is right about the time that the DOD started what would become Ada; interesting, Ada addresses maintainability, readability, manageability, and \[arguably/indirectly\] securability (in its design-goal for correctness/reliability).
I had an interesting conversation with someone a few years ago who was involved with an audit of the early source-code of Windows (pre WfW 3.11), and his company made the recommendation of a rewrite in Ada -- interesting, if MS had done so (1) the plague of buffer-overflows in late-90s/early-2000s wouldn't have existed, (2) the transition to multicore would have been relatively seamless, and quite possibly more SW would be able to take advantage of more cores, thanks to the high-level `Task` construct, and (3) the combination of #1 & #2 would have made it an even better platform for development. | null | 0 | 1546039098 | False | 0 | ecrkki7 | t3_aac063 | null | null | t3_aac063 | /r/programming/comments/aac063/when_good_engineers_write_bad_software/ecrkki7/ | 1548201043 | 3 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | deceased_parrot | t2_7q7zg | > I understand that it feels foreign from other approaches to web development, but that doesn't mean it is bad.
That's putting it mildly. It pretty much turns modern web development on its head.
> I hope that helps you on the way to understanding the thought process.
Actually, from reading all of the comments, a better analogy could be made: multiplayer videogames. The game is run on the server and the clients just send input.
Such a paradigm makes sense (and is intriguing!), but I just can't shake off how inefficient it all sounds - I mean, we're talking about running clients for potentially millions of users on your own hardware, with latency between the server and the browser.
> It likely isn't the right tech for everything
For some reason, I keep hearing that for a _lot_ of new tech these days. | null | 0 | 1544729049 | False | 0 | ebpth5i | t3_a5ssxk | null | null | t1_ebpo5qt | /r/programming/comments/a5ssxk/razor_components_for_a_javascriptfree_frontend_in/ebpth5i/ | 1547564913 | 0 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | F-0X | t2_lk6ut | Does naive mean "unaware of bitwise/bitshift operators"? If so then fine, but I'd expect basically anyone aware of them to expect the above to work. | null | 0 | 1546039098 | False | 0 | ecrkkii | t3_a9zyp3 | null | null | t1_ecq50tq | /r/programming/comments/a9zyp3/thoughts_on_rust_in_2019/ecrkkii/ | 1548201043 | 1 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | DonnyTheWalrus | t2_hbe1n | If you run into this a lot, the solution is to just find time to learn enough of it on the side. Then, during the interview, you can truthfully say that while you have never been paid to write Java, you've learned it and used it outside of work.
I find this sort of question generally comes from HR or another non-technical person. They have no idea what to look for in a strong programming candidate. They are literally just looking to cross off requirements that the technical leads doing the hiring just threw over the wall. So tweak your answers for that specific audience. Don't feel a need to be literal or precise with them, because they don't have even a minimum context to use to interpret your responses.
When you get to the point where you're talking with other devs, then you can be more precise about your experience level. It's just wasted on the HR rep. | null | 0 | 1544729178 | False | 0 | ebptnyl | t3_a5i57x | null | null | t1_ebn8u0b | /r/programming/comments/a5i57x/the_rise_of_microsoft_visual_studio_code/ebptnyl/ | 1547565025 | 4 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | Katalash | t2_2lfp0pch | Eh most of the things he listed are fad technologies that probably won’t even be relevant in 5-10 years and aren’t needed to be a dev. Being a dev on a core framework and not knowing about the low level like how memory allocation works is kinda a big oof from me though. | null | 0 | 1546039292 | False | 0 | ecrkt36 | t3_aaco1d | null | null | t1_ecr3phs | /r/programming/comments/aaco1d/things_i_dont_know_as_of_2018/ecrkt36/ | 1548201149 | -17 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | stillmoshee | t2_2rni3up1 | This is horrible, inefficient, and an utter waste of time.
I am speaking, of course, about the unnecessary invocation of `cat`. ;) | null | 1 | 1544729213 | False | 0 | ebptpqa | t3_a5sg9k | null | null | t3_a5sg9k | /r/programming/comments/a5sg9k/how_unix_programmers_at_restaurants_search_menus/ebptpqa/ | 1547565047 | 0 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | houses_of_the_holy | t2_50b3x | I enjoyed the article but 0.9s to compile sqlite? I don't know which version he is using but I just downloaded the latest and compiled it fresh and it took 1 core 1m32s and 6 cores 1m4s. So while I agree compile times in C++ are bad I think he done goofed and is maybe using something like ccache?
&#x200B;
edit: The articles single line gcc command is un-optimized, and the tarball probably also has tests? | null | 0 | 1546039381 | 1546041177 | 0 | ecrkwya | t3_aac4hg | null | null | t3_aac4hg | /r/programming/comments/aac4hg/modern_c_lamentations/ecrkwya/ | 1548201197 | 6 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | hansolo669 | t2_69pru | I believe it's somewhere in the keybinds for the workspace ... It's been a while since I had to do it | null | 0 | 1544729238 | False | 0 | ebptr35 | t3_a5mk9z | null | null | t1_ebpk3vn | /r/programming/comments/a5mk9z/visual_studio_code_version_130_released/ebptr35/ | 1547565064 | 1 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | quicknir | t2_iczmz | I felt that way a bit as well but it seemed the most constructive to take your comment at face value :-).
The perl6 vibe is nothing like what's going on in C++. Perl6 got into full swing when most people had already abandoned it to python, perl6 in real production code is a non-entity, totally niche. C++, despite the jokes (some deserved), still manages after all this time to be one of the top languages in the world. All the empirical evidence is that companies have been to 11 and beyond fairly aggressively, and adopting most features. As someone who worked professionally through the 03 -> 11 switch, I can't even tell you how much easier and cleaner it made very real, production code at mature, profitable companies. C++ pre 11 is pretty bad all around. Post 11 it has rough spots but it's a very decent language for its use case.
Also re subsetting, I think language subsetting has actually decreased. There's a couple of famous things like exceptions and RTTI, but mostly I feel like the same features are being used (which includes both lambdas and smart pointers). | null | 0 | 1546039537 | False | 0 | ecrl3tk | t3_aac4hg | null | null | t1_ecrd4y9 | /r/programming/comments/aac4hg/modern_c_lamentations/ecrl3tk/ | 1548201282 | 21 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | duhace | t2_dhfv4 | I didn't elaborate in my post, but Shenandoah is a low latency GC in the same vein as ZGC. I think both of them can be used for any size heap, but their defining feature is they can keep gc pauses low on extremely large heaps just as well as with tiny heaps. | null | 0 | 1544729243 | False | 0 | ebptrar | t3_a5umpk | null | null | t1_ebpqaj4 | /r/programming/comments/a5umpk/10_new_features_in_java_11/ebptrar/ | 1547565066 | 2 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | F-0X | t2_lk6ut | > I-presume-because-the-shift-key-is-not-required.
Exactly this for me. Additionally, I don't find camel case hard to read in the first place. | null | 0 | 1546039551 | False | 0 | ecrl4fh | t3_aaamfb | null | null | t1_ecqwe65 | /r/programming/comments/aaamfb/how_you_ever_thought_about_which_casing/ecrl4fh/ | 1548201289 | 2 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | jyper | t2_44f90 | rg __asm | null | 0 | 1544729287 | False | 0 | ebptthy | t3_a5sg9k | null | null | t1_ebpkiab | /r/programming/comments/a5sg9k/how_unix_programmers_at_restaurants_search_menus/ebptthy/ | 1547565094 | 5 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | houses_of_the_holy | t2_50b3x | [https://pastebin.com/Xc27HkRW](https://pastebin.com/Xc27HkRW) for anyone wondering | null | 0 | 1546039622 | False | 0 | ecrl7i3 | t3_aac4hg | null | null | t1_ecrkwya | /r/programming/comments/aac4hg/modern_c_lamentations/ecrl7i3/ | 1548201328 | 1 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | Isvara | t2_10v24 | You might think that, but you'd be very wrong. A lot of people prefer the strict left-to-right flow, just because it's easier (for a human) to parse. But then people see it and make a fuss about it as though they personally are being sent into the process mines to dig for more \`cat\`s. | null | 0 | 1544729315 | 1544729679 | 0 | ebptuyr | t3_a5sg9k | null | null | t1_ebox6vg | /r/programming/comments/a5sg9k/how_unix_programmers_at_restaurants_search_menus/ebptuyr/ | 1547565112 | 1 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | SaphirShroom | t2_ogov5 | Well yeah, it's hard to generate enough momentum to cause people to contribute and switch to a hard fork. I'm saying that it *could* have been written in any other language.
Git had a pretty major vulnerability just two months ago, by the way. | null | 0 | 1546039688 | False | 0 | ecrlaf9 | t3_aa3qdm | null | null | t1_ecrjbdk | /r/programming/comments/aa3qdm/please_do_not_attempt_to_simplify_this_code_keep/ecrlaf9/ | 1548201364 | 3 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | justinacolmena | t2_2jp7g9hl | Java is almost a "toy" language to me. It is compiled to Java bytecode and interpreted by the Java virtual machine. The resources available to the programmer are limited, and the garbage collection and memory deallocation are awkward.
It's almost for quick-and-easy programs intended to be written in an overly friendly "beginner's" IDE and shoehorned (after being compiled to bytecode) into a small device with a not-so-virtual hardware JVM. | null | 0 | 1544729339 | False | 0 | ebptw6h | t3_a5umpk | null | null | t3_a5umpk | /r/programming/comments/a5umpk/10_new_features_in_java_11/ebptw6h/ | 1547565127 | -29 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | drjeats | t2_4lzhn | That's called ["internal" iteration](http://journal.stuffwithstuff.com/2013/01/13/iteration-inside-and-out/), and a lot of folks don't like the inversion of control flow that it introduces.
It's almost always strictly less flexible, and definitely more annoying to step debug. | null | 0 | 1546039729 | False | 0 | ecrlcb9 | t3_aac4hg | null | null | t1_ecqzdk3 | /r/programming/comments/aac4hg/modern_c_lamentations/ecrlcb9/ | 1548201387 | 25 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | aldanor | t2_ex1ee | Amen to that. Welcome to 2019. | null | 0 | 1544729380 | False | 0 | ebptybf | t3_a57gmy | null | null | t1_ebl72ia | /r/programming/comments/a57gmy/new_experimental_windows_console_features/ebptybf/ | 1547565153 | 1 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | F-0X | t2_lk6ut | > Nim allows both, and I cannot decide if this is good or bad.
There is literally nothing to gain except problems nobody else ever has (code searching being the obvious case). | null | 0 | 1546039737 | False | 0 | ecrlcp8 | t3_aaamfb | null | null | t1_ecqbbsi | /r/programming/comments/aaamfb/how_you_ever_thought_about_which_casing/ecrlcp8/ | 1548201392 | 1 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | DuckDuckYoga | t2_wyk5i | I’m embarrassed to admit I thought you were serious at first about it being trivial and it made me feel a bit inadequate >_> | null | 0 | 1544729858 | False | 0 | ebpumkr | t3_a5sg9k | null | null | t1_ebp35nq | /r/programming/comments/a5sg9k/how_unix_programmers_at_restaurants_search_menus/ebpumkr/ | 1547565457 | 11 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | Sarcon5673 | t2_ebelr | I've been solving Project Euler questions with Python for the past year and have reached the top spot in my country (and even region).
I don't know how to make classes, make threads, nor PEP 8. | null | 0 | 1546039794 | False | 0 | ecrlfec | t3_aaco1d | null | null | t1_ecrf8qc | /r/programming/comments/aaco1d/things_i_dont_know_as_of_2018/ecrlfec/ | 1548201426 | 8 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | ZombieLincoln666 | t2_c0638 | I'll bet you money they put ads in it. Whenever a very good piece of free software becomes available from a big company, their end goal is to suck you into the platform and get huge numbers of users, and then slowly start putting ads in their products. I'm sure you can think of many examples. It's a great text editor/IDE so it will be difficult to go back to the alternatives (for me, that would be vim).
https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/microsoft/microsoft-is-showing-inline-ads-in-their-windows-10-mail-app-message-list/ | null | 0 | 1544729899 | False | 0 | ebpuom4 | t3_a5mk9z | null | null | t1_ebopojf | /r/programming/comments/a5mk9z/visual_studio_code_version_130_released/ebpuom4/ | 1547565482 | -2 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | Katalash | t2_2lfp0pch | I wouldn’t want to work with them, but I can’t say I haven’t learned a lot from what they posted when they aren’t telling someone they should die. | null | 0 | 1546039800 | False | 0 | ecrlfnc | t3_aaco1d | null | null | t1_ecrd93p | /r/programming/comments/aaco1d/things_i_dont_know_as_of_2018/ecrlfnc/ | 1548201429 | 2 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | Ameisen | t2_5qad2 | Now just wait for Microsoft Wayland for Workgroups Enterprise 2018 SP2. | null | 0 | 1544729962 | False | 0 | ebpurp5 | t3_a5hkyo | null | null | t1_ebobkwz | /r/programming/comments/a5hkyo/investigating_an_early2010s_gaming_drm_system_or/ebpurp5/ | 1547565520 | 2 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | __pg_ | t2_rcy9eog | Not sure what kind of a compiler you are using, but on my crappy 6 year old laptop:
`$ time gcc sqlite3.c -o sqlite3.o -lpthread -ld`
`real 0m2.604s`
`user 0m2.397s`
`sys 0m0.149s`
If the blog author was using a higher clocked desktop CPU then 0.9s is more than plausible. | null | 0 | 1546039806 | False | 0 | ecrlfxi | t3_aac4hg | null | null | t1_ecrkwya | /r/programming/comments/aac4hg/modern_c_lamentations/ecrlfxi/ | 1548201433 | 17 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | takacsot | t2_51cn | I am still surprized that features alredy available in other jvm languages are still from being added. Or libraries. There are so many obvious and simple improvement to add. And instead of that they are proud of having a 'repeat' finally. | null | 0 | 1544729965 | False | 0 | ebpurve | t3_a5umpk | null | null | t3_a5umpk | /r/programming/comments/a5umpk/10_new_features_in_java_11/ebpurve/ | 1547565523 | 8 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | quicknir | t2_iczmz | There's no way, by defintion, to not have the accepting function be a template and also be "zero overhead". The design of std::function isn't horrible, it's a considered trade-off. AFAICS, scoped lambda seems to be similar to the already-proposed function_view/function_ref: http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2017/p0792r0.html. | null | 1 | 1546039860 | False | 0 | ecrlid9 | t3_aac4hg | null | null | t1_ecri8oe | /r/programming/comments/aac4hg/modern_c_lamentations/ecrlid9/ | 1548201463 | 0 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | no-GET-only-PUT | t2_2owwn2t1 | Looking at your history and went back 4 months before I stopped. All you do is go into Java related threads and spew your meaningless opinions. What a truly pathetic life to live. No one finds your insight useful, no one (obviously) asked for it, and no one is better from it. You're an absolute waste of space. I code in C# too but goddamn you are the definition of a pathetic life to live. It's like you get off in being in a state of rage. | null | 0 | 1544730115 | False | 0 | ebpuzao | t3_a5umpk | null | null | t1_ebpptwj | /r/programming/comments/a5umpk/10_new_features_in_java_11/ebpuzao/ | 1547565640 | 31 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | noobody23 | t2_qt5ea | After reading this, and from my personal experience, being a good programmer doesn't mean knowing a lot of technologies but rather:
1. Being able to learn and adapt quickly when you need to use a new technology/framework.
2. Having a clear mind at all time, and being able to visualise your code before writing it, edit it in your mind and predict the output. | null | 0 | 1546039885 | False | 0 | ecrljiw | t3_aaco1d | null | null | t3_aaco1d | /r/programming/comments/aaco1d/things_i_dont_know_as_of_2018/ecrljiw/ | 1548201477 | 19 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | natrys | t2_gr41fzt | Memes can be such [thought terminating clichés](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thought-terminating_clich%C3%A9). Perl is basically the most optimized tool for this kind of workflow. And it's very possible to write sane only code in Perl, it's just the fact that Perl can also help you if you opt for insanity is what gives it a bad rep. Perl being terse and readable to sed and awk is not a surprise, that's expected. | null | 0 | 1544730121 | False | 0 | ebpuzld | t3_a5sg9k | null | null | t1_ebp03li | /r/programming/comments/a5sg9k/how_unix_programmers_at_restaurants_search_menus/ebpuzld/ | 1547565644 | 17 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | houses_of_the_holy | t2_50b3x | I downloaded the tarball and did ./configure; make; which seems to be the appropriate way to build it, but I guess its doing a lot more than just compiling sqlite3.c. I just ran his single command it is indeed got similiar to you so its probably all the tests taking so much time to compile?
&#x200B;
$ time gcc sqlite3.c -o sqlite3.o -lpthread -ld
real 0m2.790s
user 0m2.673s
sys 0m0.116s | null | 0 | 1546040015 | False | 0 | ecrlpgy | t3_aac4hg | null | null | t1_ecrlfxi | /r/programming/comments/aac4hg/modern_c_lamentations/ecrlpgy/ | 1548201550 | 4 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | rhyswes | t2_19d9nua | I'm just going to be pedantic here and say that Adyen has a much better claim to being truly global because of all the local payment methods it connects to and the fact it builds its own (global) acquiring connections in house. Worldpay is a better example of a global competitor although again strictly speaking that is a patchwork of acquired systems.
&#x200B; | null | 0 | 1544730613 | False | 0 | ebpvnxd | t3_a5rqbw | null | null | t1_ebozc2z | /r/programming/comments/a5rqbw/stories_from_the_development_team_building_the/ebpvnxd/ | 1547565943 | 2 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | ionforge | t2_hecyx | I think he's taking about something like this http://blog.ploeh.dk/2017/02/02/dependency-rejection/ | null | 0 | 1546040063 | False | 0 | ecrlroc | t3_aacv7i | null | null | t1_ecrj7ux | /r/programming/comments/aacv7i/softwarearch_using_interfaces_and_dependency/ecrlroc/ | 1548201605 | 3 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | filleduchaos | t2_7r81qd | Out of curiosity, what languages do you use? | null | 0 | 1544730765 | False | 0 | ebpvvb9 | t3_a5umpk | null | null | t1_ebptw6h | /r/programming/comments/a5umpk/10_new_features_in_java_11/ebpvvb9/ | 1547566034 | 20 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | __pg_ | t2_rcy9eog | Part of it seems to be optimizations. Simply adding -O2 increased the compile time to 15s with gcc and 40s with clang.
&#x200B;
IMO this makes for a very compelling case why debug builds must not be 100x slower than release.
&#x200B;
For some more fun ([https://bellard.org/tcc/](https://bellard.org/tcc/)):
`$ time tcc -c sqlite3.c -I ./include`
`real 0m0.087s`
`user 0m0.075s`
`sys 0m0.012s` | null | 0 | 1546040277 | 1546040766 | 0 | ecrm1au | t3_aac4hg | null | null | t1_ecrlpgy | /r/programming/comments/aac4hg/modern_c_lamentations/ecrm1au/ | 1548201724 | 17 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | aaronsb | t2_4uxfy | Because I'm a monster, the same torturous ordering process, in Powershell:
`if (([decimal](gc .\menu.txt | Select-String "Shrimp").Line.Split('$')[1]) -lt 10.00) {"Available!"} else {":("}` | null | 0 | 1544731020 | False | 0 | ebpw82a | t3_a5sg9k | null | null | t3_a5sg9k | /r/programming/comments/a5sg9k/how_unix_programmers_at_restaurants_search_menus/ebpw82a/ | 1547566222 | 7 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | TheGoodOldCoder | t2_fsmu9h3 | I think developers actually make great interviewers, if they're properly trained. The thing that's bad are the interviews themselves. | null | 0 | 1546040331 | False | 0 | ecrm3qn | t3_aaco1d | null | null | t1_ecrei69 | /r/programming/comments/aaco1d/things_i_dont_know_as_of_2018/ecrm3qn/ | 1548201754 | 20 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | McNerdius | t2_5e8bl | Running this on the server isn't the end-game. This is step 1.
Give this 2-3 minutes:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=61qmX5eAPwI&t=54m17s | null | 0 | 1544731208 | False | 0 | ebpwhe7 | t3_a5ssxk | null | null | t1_ebpth5i | /r/programming/comments/a5ssxk/razor_components_for_a_javascriptfree_frontend_in/ebpwhe7/ | 1547566337 | 2 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | rcfox | t2_6u4kr | You're writing assembly to consume GraphQL and build CSS across domains via HTTPS? | null | 0 | 1546040452 | False | 0 | ecrm9c4 | t3_aaco1d | null | null | t1_ecrfqsw | /r/programming/comments/aaco1d/things_i_dont_know_as_of_2018/ecrm9c4/ | 1548201824 | 29 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | idobai | t2_fu8kq | It wasted posted here a lot even before people started to use it. When it appeared it barely had any feature and yet it already had an overly enthusiastic fanbase. It has the same story as atom but this time all the ms fans come here praising ms too. | null | 0 | 1544731451 | False | 0 | ebpwsz2 | t3_a5i57x | null | null | t1_ebpga3j | /r/programming/comments/a5i57x/the_rise_of_microsoft_visual_studio_code/ebpwsz2/ | 1547566480 | 1 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
False | TheGoodOldCoder | t2_fsmu9h3 | The biggest thing I don't know today is whatever the latest thing is. I audit /r/programming, but the new stuff never seems relevant to anything I'm doing, which is mostly backend services in Java and Python. | null | 0 | 1546040552 | False | 0 | ecrmdxw | t3_aaco1d | null | null | t3_aaco1d | /r/programming/comments/aaco1d/things_i_dont_know_as_of_2018/ecrmdxw/ | 1548201881 | 8 | t5_2fwo | r/programming | public | null |
Subsets and Splits
Filtered Reddit Uplifting News
The query retrieves specific news articles by their link IDs, providing a basic overview of those particular entries without deeper analysis or insights.
Recent Programming Comments
Returns a limited set of programming records from 2020 to 2023, providing basic filtering with minimal analytical value.