archived
stringclasses
2 values
author
stringlengths
3
20
author_fullname
stringlengths
4
12
body
stringlengths
0
22.5k
comment_type
stringclasses
1 value
controversiality
stringclasses
2 values
created_utc
stringlengths
10
10
edited
stringlengths
4
12
gilded
stringclasses
7 values
id
stringlengths
1
7
link_id
stringlengths
7
10
locked
stringclasses
2 values
name
stringlengths
4
10
parent_id
stringlengths
5
10
permalink
stringlengths
41
91
retrieved_on
stringlengths
10
10
score
stringlengths
1
4
subreddit_id
stringclasses
1 value
subreddit_name_prefixed
stringclasses
1 value
subreddit_type
stringclasses
1 value
total_awards_received
stringclasses
19 values
False
grauenwolf
t2_570j
To make 1.1 billion in gross profits over the next 20 years, they need a 46,296 subscribers at the highest subscription level. And that's after they pay for their employees, rent, utilities, hardware, etc. And we all know that most of their "customers" are going to be using the free version and if forced to pay, will flee to the next startup. While I'm sure that they can turn a nice profit, I don't see how these valuations are being calculated beyond the "there's always a bigger sucker out there" theory of investing.
null
0
1544203272
False
0
ebauoq0
t3_a40weq
null
null
t3_a40weq
/r/programming/comments/a40weq/goldman_sachs_invests_20_million_in_devops_firm/ebauoq0/
1547311726
19
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
hasen-judy
t2_2j2as8va
No, people who invoke "don't reinvent the wheel" are basically telling anyone who builds a wheel that they should not be doing it.
null
0
1545367649
False
0
ec8boaw
t3_a7z5ni
null
null
t1_ec7cyj0
/r/programming/comments/a7z5ni/why_dependencies_are_ing_you_over_and_over_again/ec8boaw/
1547876736
3
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
IdleGandalf
t2_mmlpc
In my experience: yes. But I don't use the omni package they provide, so it may not apply.
null
0
1544203324
False
0
ebaur3t
t3_a40weq
null
null
t1_ebau4io
/r/programming/comments/a40weq/goldman_sachs_invests_20_million_in_devops_firm/ebaur3t/
1547311754
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
[deleted]
None
[deleted]
null
0
1545367746
False
0
ec8brj7
t3_a83zjo
null
null
t3_a83zjo
/r/programming/comments/a83zjo/1_year_of_c/ec8brj7/
1547876776
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
Dgc2002
t2_52v7g
Are you basing that statement on the ill-informed napkin math done in a reddit thread a few weeks back that said engineers got paid 30k a year? That comment didn't account for all sources of GitLab's revenue.
null
0
1544203339
False
0
ebaurtt
t3_a40weq
null
null
t1_ebauh51
/r/programming/comments/a40weq/goldman_sachs_invests_20_million_in_devops_firm/ebaurtt/
1547311764
6
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
gnaritas
t2_nhw0
Most of us don't care about making a more accessible Internet, we care about making money and spending time chasing the tiny market of people who care about accessibility is a fast way to lose money. We make products for people of normal abilities, it's a bigger market and it's far easier to develop products for them.
null
0
1545367837
False
0
ec8buj5
t3_a7xwy3
null
null
t3_a7xwy3
/r/programming/comments/a7xwy3/theres_already_a_blueprint_for_a_more_accessible/ec8buj5/
1547876813
2
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
DefensiveHogsFan
t2_2nlmsvqh
In what way? My company is making the switch as well and I haven't had any issues with speed
null
0
1544203365
False
0
ebaut0m
t3_a40weq
null
null
t1_ebau4io
/r/programming/comments/a40weq/goldman_sachs_invests_20_million_in_devops_firm/ebaut0m/
1547311806
4
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
hasen-judy
t2_2j2as8va
A tangent, but .. I'm not sure why you think "screwing" is not a bad word. "screwing" is literally a metaphore for "fucking", since a screw is a an erect elongated object that goes into wholes.
null
0
1545367880
False
0
ec8bvxk
t3_a7z5ni
null
null
t1_ec6qe4o
/r/programming/comments/a7z5ni/why_dependencies_are_ing_you_over_and_over_again/ec8bvxk/
1547876830
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
Roth1
t2_8osd7
Their salary calculator is open source. Try it out for your locale and I can almost guarantee that it’ll drop your pay by 30-40%.
null
0
1544203418
False
0
ebauvfn
t3_a40weq
null
null
t1_ebaurtt
/r/programming/comments/a40weq/goldman_sachs_invests_20_million_in_devops_firm/ebauvfn/
1547311836
21
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
gnaritas
t2_nhw0
You've missed his point entirely, it's not worth the money to do that extra work.
null
0
1545367901
False
0
ec8bwm8
t3_a7xwy3
null
null
t1_ec71cw5
/r/programming/comments/a7xwy3/theres_already_a_blueprint_for_a_more_accessible/ec8bwm8/
1547876838
2
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
zGca3ysfnosmTuEK
t2_3rt3uk
People want to deploy their applications in Docker containers. Containers are like VMs, except less overhead. They can simplify many server (and development machine) configuration tasks and provide a decent level of isolation in terms of security, resource usage, etc., for the applications running in them. The simplest way to run a container is to just use Docker and run it directly, but for a big complicated application with multiple containers doing different things, you want a container orchestration technology. That is what Kubernetes is. You define what your deployment looks like in configuration files, create a cluster composed of a master node (physical machine) and multiple worker nodes, and Kubernetes automatically schedules the containers to run where it sees fit, subject to the constraints you have defined in your configuration files. It also handles networking between containers, routing external connections to the appropriate container (via a "service" abstraction), load balancing and autoscaling, and a bunch of other stuff. For a simple monolithic application that will fit on a single machine (i.e. most things) kubernetes is overkill, but if you're operating at a larger scale and need the stuff mentioned above, it's worth looking into it.
null
0
1544203424
False
0
ebauvqg
t3_a3tk0q
null
null
t1_ebasvj0
/r/programming/comments/a3tk0q/is_k8s_too_complicated/ebauvqg/
1547311839
3
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
onometre
t2_1olfdwmq
"but the US is worse!!!!" - this sub
null
1
1545367910
1545370478
0
ec8bwy1
t3_a857kr
null
null
t3_a857kr
/r/programming/comments/a857kr/china_hacked_hpe_ibm_and_then_attacked_clients/ec8bwy1/
1547876842
-3
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
[deleted]
None
I find this significantly more elegant: def attack(obstacles, cx, cy, dx, dy, lx, ly, csum): if cx > lx or cy > ly or cx < 1 or cy < 1: return csum if (cx, cy) in obstacles: return csum return attack(obstacles, cx+dx,cy+dy,dx,dy,lx,ly,csum+1) # Complete the queensAttack function below. def queensAttack(n, k, row, col, obstacles): obstacles = set(map(tuple,obstacles)) directions = [(i,j) for i in range(-1,2) for j in range(-1,2) if (i,j) != (0,0)] return sum(map(lambda x: attack(obstacles, row+x[0], col+x[1],*x,n,n,0),directions)) Now, python doesn't allow tail call recursion, however, there are ways to get around that. Since the recursion is very easy here, one can trivially tweak it to loop.
null
0
1544203501
1544204289
0
ebauzbg
t3_a41d0f
null
null
t1_ebapn29
/r/programming/comments/a41d0f/my_php_solution_to_queens_attack_ii_hackerrank/ebauzbg/
1547311883
2
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
gnaritas
t2_nhw0
Why should we? It's not worth the effort or money it'd take. We build apps to make money, not to be helpful to a tiny market we don't care about.
null
1
1545368000
False
0
ec8bzz7
t3_a7xwy3
null
null
t1_ec792d6
/r/programming/comments/a7xwy3/theres_already_a_blueprint_for_a_more_accessible/ec8bzz7/
1547876880
0
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
grauenwolf
t2_570j
> It's also pretty rare since it's a symptom of awful database design. I take it that you've never heard of denormalized tables? Or aggregate tables? Or logging tables?
null
0
1544203543
False
0
ebav18m
t3_a3dobm
null
null
t1_eb9mylp
/r/programming/comments/a3dobm/at_22_years_old_postgres_might_just_be_the_most/ebav18m/
1547311907
2
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
GreedyRhombus
t2_a2okp
I bet you will
null
0
1545368043
False
0
ec8c1fm
t3_a7aua9
null
null
t1_ec2135u
/r/programming/comments/a7aua9/why_you_should_learn_f/ec8c1fm/
1547876897
2
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
shevegen
t2_atqp
We complained, rightfully so, about Microsoft assimilating GitHub. Now Goldman Sucks, famous for various deceits (greece presented a lie to the other EU states years ago, thanks to Goldman Sucks), becomes a part-owner of GitLab. So all those who said that GitLab is no real alternative to GitHub were right. We really need de-centralized, non-corporate owned and controlled collaboration between people. Stop building those walled ghettos everywhere.
null
1
1544203563
False
0
ebav25z
t3_a40weq
null
null
t3_a40weq
/r/programming/comments/a40weq/goldman_sachs_invests_20_million_in_devops_firm/ebav25z/
1547311919
-7
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
TankorSmash
t2_4fqx0
I just messed around with Rust for a bit, I definitely don't get it, but it seems like there's no default constructors, so if you're composing a struct out of other structs, you need to nest all their values all the way down. That seems ridiculous. struct Name { _name : String } impl Name { fn pretty_name (&self) -> String { return "anything".to_string(); } } struct Hero { name: Name } fn main(){ let jimothy = Hero{name: Name{_name:"".to_string()}}; //why can't this just be let jimoty = Hero {}; println!("{}", jimothy.name.pretty_name()); //'anything' is printed }
null
0
1545368071
False
0
ec8c2d7
t3_a80lqp
null
null
t3_a80lqp
/r/programming/comments/a80lqp/announcing_rust_1311/ec8c2d7/
1547876909
5
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
nerplederple
t2_5kdv7
Gitlab CE on-premise works really well for my homelab and for my team at work but, we don't have anything particularly enormous or complex that relies on it. Can't beat the price of free dollars either since we have no budget for basically anything.
null
0
1544203564
False
0
ebav26n
t3_a40weq
null
null
t3_a40weq
/r/programming/comments/a40weq/goldman_sachs_invests_20_million_in_devops_firm/ebav26n/
1547311919
3
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
gnaritas
t2_nhw0
> accessibility, localization and security all ultimately make the software better and more profitable. No they don't, they make it less profitable as they greatly bloat the development efforts and cost.
null
0
1545368131
False
0
ec8c4hf
t3_a7xwy3
null
null
t1_ec7g3fu
/r/programming/comments/a7xwy3/theres_already_a_blueprint_for_a_more_accessible/ec8c4hf/
1547876936
9
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
shevegen
t2_atqp
Now you are not a peon of Microsoft but a peon of Goldman sucks. Is that really better? PS: I admit that this is somewhat hypocritical of me because I presently have an account at GitLab and none at GitHub. I should really delete my account at GitLab ... but for the time being I'll keep it. It's more or less a ghost account anyway - I think in the last month I may have contributed to one or two discussions at GitLab.
null
0
1544203634
False
0
ebav5ek
t3_a40weq
null
null
t1_ebat7y8
/r/programming/comments/a40weq/goldman_sachs_invests_20_million_in_devops_firm/ebav5ek/
1547311959
-34
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
thecosmicmuffet
t2_1e1k9nws
We’re only in control of the information we upvote.
null
0
1545368213
False
0
ec8c78u
t3_a83zjo
null
null
t1_ec8axux
/r/programming/comments/a83zjo/1_year_of_c/ec8c78u/
1547876970
3
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
phatskat
t2_cvcxl
That’s a bold assumption. Recently had a bug in Edge where a `<li>` field had a “value” attribute that was numeric. Did you know that the W3C standard for HTML5 says that this value should fit within the bounds of +/- MAXINT? It does, but the only browser to enforce it is Edge. All other browsers are like “idc if it’s larger than max int, go for it!” but Edge will cap the value. That’s just one example, and I understand that IE11 != Edge, but I think I tested both to the same effect.
null
0
1544203641
False
0
ebav5pp
t3_a3q1vh
null
null
t1_eb87ppz
/r/programming/comments/a3q1vh/its_official_chromium_is_coming_to_microsoft_edge/ebav5pp/
1547311963
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
falconfetus8
t2_5lnfr
Where?
null
0
1545368236
False
0
ec8c805
t3_a7whml
null
null
t1_ec6o91u
/r/programming/comments/a7whml/advent_of_other_peoples_code_a_generic_solution/ec8c805/
1547877010
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
After_Dark
t2_67jra
It's not that I'm keeping tabs, it's that they tracked down every comment I've made about AMP and called me a liar and said my usage of the AMP documentation is "propaganda"
null
0
1544203644
False
0
ebav5ve
t3_a3whn0
null
null
t1_ebau4jx
/r/programming/comments/a3whn0/you_dont_need_pwa_or_amp_to_make_your_website/ebav5ve/
1547311964
5
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
gnaritas
t2_nhw0
Yes it is.
null
0
1545368292
False
0
ec8c9va
t3_a7xwy3
null
null
t1_ec7ehh5
/r/programming/comments/a7xwy3/theres_already_a_blueprint_for_a_more_accessible/ec8c9va/
1547877033
2
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
kamikuma000
t2_ycwjgd2
Okay I'm understanding a bit now, thanks for the explanation.
null
0
1544203678
False
0
ebav7g4
t3_a3tk0q
null
null
t1_ebauvqg
/r/programming/comments/a3tk0q/is_k8s_too_complicated/ebav7g4/
1547311984
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
LoneWolf6
t2_65y19
I have looked at both acpi and device tree in the past year and I wouldn't touch acpi with a ten foot pole, while I quite a enjoyed device tree
null
0
1545368360
False
0
ec8cc7z
t3_a7xrne
null
null
t3_a7xrne
/r/programming/comments/a7xrne/introducing_project_mu/ec8cc7z/
1547877061
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
shevegen
t2_atqp
When the GitHub CEOs sold their startup to Microsoft, they cashed in for themselves - not for the other engineers. They are just worker drones for them.
null
0
1544203679
False
0
ebav7gl
t3_a40weq
null
null
t1_ebauh51
/r/programming/comments/a40weq/goldman_sachs_invests_20_million_in_devops_firm/ebav7gl/
1547311984
13
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
Phr0ztByte
t2_370fr
People downvote your parent for saying it's not terribly clear that WinForms will not be cross-platform. You then go to say they are, which they aren't (I know you found out further down), down-voting you, while you where proving his point. Beware of programmers, for they are a fickle bunch :)
null
0
1545368515
False
0
ec8chha
t3_a7xki7
null
null
t1_ec6hbo6
/r/programming/comments/a7xki7/net_core_whats_coming_in_net_core_30/ec8chha/
1547877126
3
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
Nobody_1707
t2_9nnrc
I wonder if it's powering the new Minecraft Javascripting Engine.
null
0
1544203695
False
0
ebav87f
t3_a3twpj
null
null
t1_eb9xfk4
/r/programming/comments/a3twpj/microsoft_created_a_git_document_of_goals_and/ebav87f/
1547311993
3
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
bwainfweeze
t2_8l5zp
Ah, good ol’ cruise control. Nothing says Continuous like a server you have to restart every time you change the configuration. There were a couple more between CC and Hudson but I’ll allow that Hudson enjoyed and/or contributed to the popularity curve of CI.
null
0
1545368577
False
0
ec8cjlr
t3_a7zaew
null
null
t1_ec6usb6
/r/programming/comments/a7zaew/7_cicd_tools_for_sysadmins_opensourcecom/ec8cjlr/
1547877152
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
steveklabnik1
t2_d7udf
Yep. Just an oversight.
null
0
1544203704
False
0
ebav8lg
t3_a3q3e2
null
null
t1_ebatzvy
/r/programming/comments/a3q3e2/rust_131_and_rust_2018/ebav8lg/
1547311998
2
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
gnaritas
t2_nhw0
We're not making buildings, we're making apps; they're not generally comparable. There are no standards, programming is the wild west, there's a 1000 ways to do everything. Companies judge software by what it adds or subtracts from the bottom line, not by whether it matches someone else's idea of what some bullshit standard says. If it makes money, it's good software.
null
0
1545368687
False
0
ec8cn63
t3_a7xwy3
null
null
t1_ec7ycwp
/r/programming/comments/a7xwy3/theres_already_a_blueprint_for_a_more_accessible/ec8cn63/
1547877196
5
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
NicolasGuacamole
t2_cyzs2
Yes I’m sure the only thing stopping you, a single person, from overhauling decades of person hours of work is your highly constrained time.
null
0
1544203704
False
0
ebav8lj
t3_a3ps00
null
null
t1_eb93w1o
/r/programming/comments/a3ps00/rust_2018_is_here_but_what_is_it/ebav8lj/
1547311998
10
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
Tasgall
t2_4qhg2
> It takes no time and no resources In theory - in practice, that's not the case. Sure it's not _hard_, but it's tedious and managers don't see shiny new features, so you have to fight for the time to do it. But that's still sidestepping the point that the specific example is a really bad example. I get that it's not just about completely blind people, but those still fall under the category of people who likely don't have licenses, and thus aren't likely to use that website in the first place. The insurance website is a far better example, and obviously one where accessibility would be extremely important.
null
0
1545368910
False
0
ec8cugq
t3_a7xwy3
null
null
t1_ec85i7k
/r/programming/comments/a7xwy3/theres_already_a_blueprint_for_a_more_accessible/ec8cugq/
1547877286
3
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
Toph_is_bad_ass
t2_do74n
TIL using a product == peon
null
0
1544203705
False
0
ebav8ng
t3_a40weq
null
null
t1_ebav5ek
/r/programming/comments/a40weq/goldman_sachs_invests_20_million_in_devops_firm/ebav8ng/
1547311999
25
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
gnaritas
t2_nhw0
That's not a business incentive, that's a point of personal pride. And correlation isn't causation, that it takes skill to make a good disability-friendly site in no way implies non-disability sites don't also take skill and simply have no valid biz reason to provide accessibility.
null
0
1545369059
False
0
ec8czcq
t3_a7xwy3
null
null
t1_ec791ap
/r/programming/comments/a7xwy3/theres_already_a_blueprint_for_a_more_accessible/ec8czcq/
1547877346
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
daymanAAaah
t2_jod21
I haven’t used it recently but a year or two ago I tried to make the switch and the experience was just not great. The CI was unreliable at times and I’m pretty sure their service went down for maintenance, which just seems ridiculous nowadays.
null
0
1544203739
False
0
ebava97
t3_a40weq
null
null
t1_ebaue0v
/r/programming/comments/a40weq/goldman_sachs_invests_20_million_in_devops_firm/ebava97/
1547312019
4
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
balefrost
t2_6lw8n
Just to be clear, I like helping people too. And taking 20 minutes here or there won't really affect anything. But taking time away from your sprint to do unplanned features *usually* ends up doing more harm than good. Without process in place, it's easy to fall into a "service the squeakiest wheel" mentality, and that just makes the releases less predictable. When there *is* a process in place, then you don't have to feel guilty for telling people "no". You can point to the process and say "that's how we do it here, and there's a reason that we do things that way". So when I said that I'd lean on "there's the backlog", I meant that I'd try to train people to work within the process - both for my benefit and theirs.
null
0
1545369092
False
0
ec8d0h7
t3_a806xl
null
null
t1_ec8b2dl
/r/programming/comments/a806xl/dark_scrum/ec8d0h7/
1547877361
2
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
ifcologne
t2_jakm1
Integrated C++ full-text search has great potential, especially in combination with graph traversals or joins in AQL. Disclaimer: I work for ArangoDB, so I had plenty of time to play with 3.4... Product search example: One could e.g. search for products with product reviews that contain certain phrases (like "easy to use") and do a traversal afterwards to reduce the number of products to those that: - are "easy to use" // and similar phrases (full-text search) - have at least 3 reviews matching the phrases above (aggregation on result) - have at least 10 product reviews (traversal) - have an average review >= 4.3 (traversal) - sorted by avg.review DESC The result would be more relevant than current approaches and could be expressed in a single AQL query. When I tested with an amazon dataset I could easily find a "pool test stripe" out of 219 products that could be used by users that could not distinguish between red and green.
null
0
1544203769
False
0
ebavbnu
t3_a41tsz
null
null
t3_a41tsz
/r/programming/comments/a41tsz/arangodb_34_ga_fulltext_search_geojson_streaming/ebavbnu/
1547312036
3
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
rspeed
t2_4agyz
Which is fine, but it should at least do a check to make sure the commit *actually exists* in the upstream repo.
null
0
1545369135
False
0
ec8d1yx
t3_a82nec
null
null
t1_ec7joyk
/r/programming/comments/a82nec/this_github_url_makes_it_look_like_linux_has_a/ec8d1yx/
1547877379
32
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
thebritisharecome
t2_im1m9
Mixed feelings about this. Cool idea for a bit of fun, maybe pratical in pair programming situations? really - it's the sort of thing desktop IDE's need, no company I've ever worked for would upload their code base to a third party service like this.
null
0
1544203778
False
0
ebavc32
t3_a3z3i9
null
null
t3_a3z3i9
/r/programming/comments/a3z3i9/replit_multiplier/ebavc32/
1547312040
111
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
rspeed
t2_4agyz
In this case, (I believe) the *actual* URL is: https://github.com/andrewrk/linux/blob/b4061a10fc29010a610ff2b5b20160d7335e69bf/drivers/hid/hid-samsung.c#L113-L118
null
0
1545369217
False
0
ec8d4m9
t3_a82nec
null
null
t1_ec7lw78
/r/programming/comments/a82nec/this_github_url_makes_it_look_like_linux_has_a/ec8d4m9/
1547877411
3
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
anothdae
t2_15wz2i
I. use. it.
null
0
1544203797
False
0
ebavd00
t3_a3q1vh
null
null
t1_eba1x5z
/r/programming/comments/a3q1vh/its_official_chromium_is_coming_to_microsoft_edge/ebavd00/
1547312052
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
Euphoricus
t2_eojv1
Even scrum master would have hard time when the manager in question outranks him and the manager cannot admit that there is something wrong. I tried to explain the problem to him few times, but it fell on deaf ears. Well. I'm leaving in a month, so it is no longer my problem.
null
0
1545369326
False
0
ec8d8af
t3_a806xl
null
null
t1_ec7qk5n
/r/programming/comments/a806xl/dark_scrum/ec8d8af/
1547877457
2
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
shevegen
t2_atqp
Except that Microsoft paid +7 billion for GitHub and GitHub was never as profitable to get back that investment. It was a strategic investment. GitLab will do precisely the same too. People who claim the opposite can answer to us why IBM suddenly acquired Red Hat. The CEOs are in a pyramid game here - sell out for max value. All your calculation is thus irrelevant. GitHub showed that you don't need to make real profit, in order to remain worth a LOT.
null
0
1544203801
False
0
ebavd68
t3_a40weq
null
null
t1_ebauoq0
/r/programming/comments/a40weq/goldman_sachs_invests_20_million_in_devops_firm/ebavd68/
1547312054
18
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
istarian
t2_4ttmg
I've never even heard of that, although I don't do serious web dev. Is it an HTML5 thing or browser specific?
null
0
1545369410
False
0
ec8db55
t3_a7xwy3
null
null
t1_ec7hedv
/r/programming/comments/a7xwy3/theres_already_a_blueprint_for_a_more_accessible/ec8db55/
1547877492
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
anything_here
t2_514qx
\> Are you basing that statement on the ill-informed napkin math done in a reddit thread a few weeks back that said engineers got paid 30k a year? Here's some pretty well informed discussion on the topic of their salary calculator: [https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18441768](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18441768) TLDR: Don't go to work there unless you happen to fall into one of the metro areas that gets a favorable modifier. And you also don't mind having to ask your remote employer for permission to move and potentially take a pay cut for doing so.
null
0
1544203822
1544204143
0
ebave39
t3_a40weq
null
null
t1_ebaurtt
/r/programming/comments/a40weq/goldman_sachs_invests_20_million_in_devops_firm/ebave39/
1547312065
5
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
recycled_ideas
t2_bpl7i
An element with an onclick is an input, space is an analogue for clicking. There's no reason at all that keyboard navigation shouldn't be able to handle this (unless someone puts an onclick on a text input).
null
0
1545369518
False
0
ec8deo5
t3_a7xwy3
null
null
t1_ec85s7j
/r/programming/comments/a7xwy3/theres_already_a_blueprint_for_a_more_accessible/ec8deo5/
1547877535
2
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
rekIfdyt2
t2_7jmd3dk
Am I? For the record I oppose the impossibility of loading unsigned extensions in "normal" Firefox[0], which is the closest analogue to the walled garden from iOS (though it's still far less restrictive — almost anything can get signed; it just won't be displayed on AMO). I also don't think that my argument can be used in favour of an iOS-like walled garden. A well-defined API != a walled garden. [0] mostly because it's pretty pointless and just annoying
null
0
1544203831
False
0
ebavekb
t3_a3t3rg
null
null
t1_ebakgt4
/r/programming/comments/a3t3rg/goodbye_edgehtml_the_mozilla_blog/ebavekb/
1547312072
3
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
istarian
t2_4ttmg
My point was about functionality and aesthetics mattering more than any underly meaning to the layout. The first thing most people notice about a site is how it looks and significant part of user experience is often concerned with where the eye naturally goes.
null
0
1545369555
False
0
ec8dfvu
t3_a7xwy3
null
null
t1_ec81hw5
/r/programming/comments/a7xwy3/theres_already_a_blueprint_for_a_more_accessible/ec8dfvu/
1547877550
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
freakboy2k
t2_351y5
Valuations have been decoupled from fundamentals in tech for a long time now. A big part of it is the belief that a bigger fish will come along and acquire the company (like Microsoft and Github) and those acquisitions aren't just looking at revenue, they're valuing other things as well like user base and network effects, brand name / good will, staff, and how the business fills some niche in their overall offering. Not saying that makes sense at all, but that seems to be the way of things for now. GS aren't expecting to get paid out like a regular company, they'll be betting on a buyout by a Microsoft rival.
null
0
1544203837
False
0
ebaveuc
t3_a40weq
null
null
t1_ebauoq0
/r/programming/comments/a40weq/goldman_sachs_invests_20_million_in_devops_firm/ebaveuc/
1547312075
14
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
Joshtopher_Biggins
t2_e97mh
Yeah I agree with you
null
0
1545369593
False
0
ec8dh43
t3_a806xl
null
null
t1_ec8d0h7
/r/programming/comments/a806xl/dark_scrum/ec8dh43/
1547877565
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
eXeC64
t2_5vz0s
You could make the same argument about Lehmann and mortgages in 2007. Argument from authority is a fun logical fallacy.
null
0
1544203837
False
0
ebavev9
t3_a3yuut
null
null
t1_ebanplb
/r/programming/comments/a3yuut/advantages_of_functional_programming_for/ebavev9/
1547312075
5
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
feverzsj
t2_tdfgz
and when will it be stable?
null
0
1545369748
False
0
ec8dm93
t3_a80lqp
null
null
t3_a80lqp
/r/programming/comments/a80lqp/announcing_rust_1311/ec8dm93/
1547877659
-12
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
MirrorNext
t2_y6jeq
The company I work for uses it and it veeeery slow. We have a gigantic repo.
null
0
1544203873
False
0
ebavgk8
t3_a40weq
null
null
t1_ebaue0v
/r/programming/comments/a40weq/goldman_sachs_invests_20_million_in_devops_firm/ebavgk8/
1547312096
3
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
steveklabnik1
t2_d7udf
Rust has been stable for three and a half years now.
null
0
1545369782
False
0
ec8dndv
t3_a80lqp
null
null
t1_ec8dm93
/r/programming/comments/a80lqp/announcing_rust_1311/ec8dndv/
1547877673
26
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
hastati96
t2_12pgbt
yes - for this reason we switched to Jenkins but the Gitlab CI is great, definetly a good choice
null
0
1544203890
False
0
ebavhay
t3_a40weq
null
null
t1_ebaue0v
/r/programming/comments/a40weq/goldman_sachs_invests_20_million_in_devops_firm/ebavhay/
1547312105
2
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
foxh8er
t2_60e80
Hey! That's the guy that writes Zig! what's the deal
null
0
1545369975
False
0
ec8dtt9
t3_a82nec
null
null
t1_ec8d4m9
/r/programming/comments/a82nec/this_github_url_makes_it_look_like_linux_has_a/ec8dtt9/
1547877753
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
caspy7
t2_bcbm6
This doesn't lend itself to a healthy web. 😐
null
0
1544203927
False
0
ebavj0r
t3_a3t3rg
null
null
t1_ebaf8s0
/r/programming/comments/a3t3rg/goodbye_edgehtml_the_mozilla_blog/ebavj0r/
1547312126
16
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
AmpleSling
t2_dizio8q
Dod
null
0
1545370032
False
0
ec8dvnl
t3_a83zjo
null
null
t1_ec7zf4n
/r/programming/comments/a83zjo/1_year_of_c/ec8dvnl/
1547877776
7
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
dannomac
t2_1aqzl
So they can ask their corporate lawyer for advice?
null
0
1544203962
False
0
ebavklz
t3_a3kk7u
null
null
t1_eb7np2q
/r/programming/comments/a3kk7u/australian_programmers_could_be_fired_by_their/ebavklz/
1547312146
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
pknopf
t2_m20fv
https://github.com/qmlnet/qmlnet
null
0
1545370036
False
0
ec8dvsm
t3_a7xki7
null
null
t1_ec6vehi
/r/programming/comments/a7xki7/net_core_whats_coming_in_net_core_30/ec8dvsm/
1547877778
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
X678X
t2_ku10e
Their engineers are underpaid. They stick pretty closely to their salary calculator when determining your pay. I went through the interview process with them and they wouldn't budge much from it.
null
0
1544203997
False
0
ebavmbc
t3_a40weq
null
null
t1_ebaurtt
/r/programming/comments/a40weq/goldman_sachs_invests_20_million_in_devops_firm/ebavmbc/
1547312167
6
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
xenarthran_salesman
t2_cs5pc
Github pull requests, on the other hand, are actually stored inside of the upstream repository, but you usually wont see them on a normal clone. If you do a `git clone --mirror https://github.com/torvalds/linux` The mirror flag will get *all* upstream refs, which is where github stores its pull requests. after it mirrors the entire repo, a `git show-ref` will reveal every pull request ever, even closed ones, along with their attempted merges. fb402d626b9efd6e575f5904baef5cc954d40a77 refs/pull/631/head a312384e19a8bc5aa892690b344d46d18eb49c1c refs/pull/631/merge e5eb09d9f3267625402a64da431563ccb2a2c285 refs/pull/632/head b54f429a64aadbbef956259a9f3b4080951a44c8 refs/pull/632/merge 58c3522a972b14b7e6005c69e1d3dfe795997a1f refs/pull/633/head 9318b97ab65d511a1cd9511e29626b74eac37f20 refs/pull/633/merge This can be a handy way of working on pull requests locally. Mirror the repo and check out the PR ref.
null
0
1545370137
False
1
ec8dz2m
t3_a82nec
null
null
t1_ec7joyk
/r/programming/comments/a82nec/this_github_url_makes_it_look_like_linux_has_a/ec8dz2m/
1547877817
79
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
fairlybinary
t2_110a5t
Completely agree. This is pretty cool, but not something I'd show my Manger to implement. I would think this could greatly assist with FOSS projects though.
null
0
1544204044
False
0
ebavohc
t3_a3z3i9
null
null
t1_ebavc32
/r/programming/comments/a3z3i9/replit_multiplier/ebavohc/
1547312194
16
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
shoot_your_eye_out
t2_gqowy
Yup, Edge has WebRTC support which (in theory) is completely compatible with Chrome/Firefox/Safari, although it's a bit odd and in reality YMMV. The reason for this is WebRTC is an API standard, but much of the quality is in the details of implementation and not adherence to a standard. Similar to H.264 and other video codecs, where it's quite easy to make a video encoder that *adheres to the standard* but *insanely difficult* to write one that actually does a good job.
null
0
1545370196
False
0
ec8e0y9
t3_a7k0an
null
null
t1_ec5qf57
/r/programming/comments/a7k0an/did_google_cripple_edges_youtube_performance/ec8e0y9/
1547877840
0
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
thebritisharecome
t2_im1m9
I can definitely see the advantages - especially when working with other people to solve a problem. You can work at your own system, your own desk but together to solve the problem. But I guess does it do much in comparison to a screen share? feels a bit gimmicky
null
0
1544204187
False
0
ebavv16
t3_a3z3i9
null
null
t1_ebavohc
/r/programming/comments/a3z3i9/replit_multiplier/ebavv16/
1547312274
4
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
kickulus
t2_5qste
That's cause most reposts aren't bullshit. We only hate the ones that aren't harmless
null
0
1545370244
False
0
ec8e2hp
t3_a83zjo
null
null
t1_ec88us7
/r/programming/comments/a83zjo/1_year_of_c/ec8e2hp/
1547877859
2
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
aditseng
t2_j7kng
I think you're missing the point of open source. The code is available, and you \*can\* self host it. You also can make changes and send a pull request for bugs you fixed. The benefits you lose are: * Google cache (you can use CloudFlare) * AMP validation (your site will still be fast) * Google will not show the lightning icon next to your site * You will not automatically get the latest version of the js file. The first 3 are clearly about your page ranking on Google -- and yes Google does exert monopoly over search. However, it does not have any non-open-source limitations. Google may push you to use their servers but you are not required to.
null
0
1544204298
False
0
ebaw05a
t3_a3whn0
null
null
t1_ebau2vs
/r/programming/comments/a3whn0/you_dont_need_pwa_or_amp_to_make_your_website/ebaw05a/
1547312337
2
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
shoot_your_eye_out
t2_gqowy
Edge is able to optimize for this, and eventually did correct the issue. They're just whining about having to conform to web standards, where yes, it is entirely above board to position elements on top of a video tag. TL;DR writing a browser is hard. If you're gonna be dumb, you better be tough.
null
0
1545370307
False
0
ec8e4he
t3_a7k0an
null
null
t1_ec4w3zm
/r/programming/comments/a7k0an/did_google_cripple_edges_youtube_performance/ec8e4he/
1547877884
0
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
vividboarder
t2_4cz8r
$20M/$1.1B is only a 2% stake... far from being controlled by Goldman.
null
0
1544204333
False
0
ebaw1pk
t3_a40weq
null
null
t1_ebav5ek
/r/programming/comments/a40weq/goldman_sachs_invests_20_million_in_devops_firm/ebaw1pk/
1547312357
16
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
FakeNamek
t2_2n58p8p1
Not to dismiss this story, as it may very well be true. But I don't doubt the ability of our government to stretch the truth when it suits them.
null
0
1545370313
False
0
ec8e4ne
t3_a857kr
null
null
t1_ec874hm
/r/programming/comments/a857kr/china_hacked_hpe_ibm_and_then_attacked_clients/ec8e4ne/
1547877886
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
ioneska
t2_r9361
You are quite young then. Because early modems used to provide web with slightly less speed: say, 300 bit per second, which would give you a 1 KB for 27 seconds.
null
0
1544204345
False
0
ebaw28u
t3_a3whn0
null
null
t1_ebam31r
/r/programming/comments/a3whn0/you_dont_need_pwa_or_amp_to_make_your_website/ebaw28u/
1547312364
-2
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
mod-victim
t2_2f184bks
Comparing the United States to Iran as if they're both the same. No... they're not. Not by a long shot. Women have no rights and good luck if you're LGBT. Perhaps you should.. you know... read a book or something?
null
1
1545370386
False
0
ec8e6z3
t3_a857kr
null
null
t1_ec85kle
/r/programming/comments/a857kr/china_hacked_hpe_ibm_and_then_attacked_clients/ec8e6z3/
1547877914
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
s73v3r
t2_3c7qc
>Your claim how it is "optional" has been refuted already. Link?
null
0
1544204379
False
0
ebaw3r7
t3_a3whn0
null
null
t1_eba78t0
/r/programming/comments/a3whn0/you_dont_need_pwa_or_amp_to_make_your_website/ebaw3r7/
1547312412
3
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
_kst_
t2_4dduv
No, it won't automatically include `<string.h>`. Under C90 rules, it's legal to call a function with no visible declaration. Doing so creates an implicit declaration, assuming the function takes the promoted types of the arguments you passed and returns `int` -- which is not correct for `memcpy(hdev->data, payload)`. If the call doesn't match the actual definition, the behavior is undefined. Under C99 and later, it's a constraint violation, but gcc by default (unfortunately IMHO) will issue a non-fatal warning, not a fatal error message. gcc also knows that `memcpy` is a standard library function, but it just uses that information to produce better diagnostics. (If you compile with `gcc -std=c99 -pedantic-errors` it will treat language violations as fatal errors. I don't think the kernel is compiled with that option.)
null
0
1545370480
False
0
ec8e9wy
t3_a82nec
null
null
t1_ec80cdt
/r/programming/comments/a82nec/this_github_url_makes_it_look_like_linux_has_a/ec8e9wy/
1547877952
3
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
progfu
t2_4llk6
But aren't all crashes a result of explicit unsafe calls? I thought the whole point (apart from no segfaults due to memory safety) was that you had explicit error handling, and similarly to Haskell, you could just handle your edge cases explicitly ... or be lazy and panic!
null
0
1544204436
False
0
ebaw6bp
t3_a3t3rg
null
null
t1_ebau4v3
/r/programming/comments/a3t3rg/goodbye_edgehtml_the_mozilla_blog/ebaw6bp/
1547312444
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
n0tcricket
t2_9unab
Not programming
null
0
1545370618
False
0
ec8ee8t
t3_a857kr
null
null
t3_a857kr
/r/programming/comments/a857kr/china_hacked_hpe_ibm_and_then_attacked_clients/ec8ee8t/
1547878005
5
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
enleeten
t2_h1aev
Its written in Ruby, so it's never going to be very fast unless you can throw a ton of hardware at it and scale it. I like Gitlab but I've found it to be slow and for a while, it would use an insane amount of memory (maxing out a 16GB server).
null
0
1544204512
False
0
ebaw9us
t3_a40weq
null
null
t1_ebaue0v
/r/programming/comments/a40weq/goldman_sachs_invests_20_million_in_devops_firm/ebaw9us/
1547312488
2
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
_kst_
t2_4dduv
This declaration: static const payload[] = "\x89\x7d\xf8\x88\x45\xf7\x48\x89" "\x02\x5d\xc3\x48\x8b\x45\xf8\x48" "\xd8\x48\x8b\x4d\xe0\x8a\x55\xf7"; is also very odd. It specifies that `payload` is an array, but not its element type. That's illegal in C99 and later, and at least questionable in C90. gcc complains: error: wide character array initialized from non-wide string (It's assuming `payload` is of type `int[]`.) I think the author may have deliberately written code that looks like a back door, but actually won't compile, to avoid any risk of the code actually being used.
null
0
1545370705
False
0
ec8egy9
t3_a82nec
null
null
t1_ec7nuog
/r/programming/comments/a82nec/this_github_url_makes_it_look_like_linux_has_a/ec8egy9/
1547878038
25
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
babypuncher_
t2_1i5gg0ik
Not being Google is enough reason for me to use Firefox over Chrome regardless of performance.
null
0
1544204571
False
0
ebawcp2
t3_a3t3rg
null
null
t1_eba0mmo
/r/programming/comments/a3t3rg/goodbye_edgehtml_the_mozilla_blog/ebawcp2/
1547312523
6
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
Programmdude
t2_d32xq
And so were buildings for a long time. Standards only arose fairly recently.
null
0
1545370711
False
0
ec8eh4z
t3_a7xwy3
null
null
t1_ec8cn63
/r/programming/comments/a7xwy3/theres_already_a_blueprint_for_a_more_accessible/ec8eh4z/
1547878040
-1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
GroceryBagHead
t2_4ron7
Didn't that dev Github fired was paid USD250K /year (and still e-begging for hormonal drugs)? That sounds like crazy money for a Canadian me.
null
0
1544204774
False
0
ebawm5p
t3_a40weq
null
null
t1_ebav7gl
/r/programming/comments/a40weq/goldman_sachs_invests_20_million_in_devops_firm/ebawm5p/
1547312640
7
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
shoot_your_eye_out
t2_gqowy
In my experience with WebRTC--which I've followed for years as a video engineer--Google did no such thing. They rolled it out early, sure, but they went through normal standards processes, and it was a painstaking, long and arduous process to get other browser vendors on board to be compatible. Particularly Microsoft, and *absolutely* Apple, which took a very hard-line position on video codecs that did nothing but benefit them. When they did finally release WebRTC, they did so in a way that was blatantly non-compliant with the widely agreed upon compromise around codecs. So no, my experience with Google hasn't been yours. They make a product, and propose a standard, but that doesn't magically make it a standard, and it's incredibly hard to get other browser vendors to agree on a standard because most of them are fighting to preserve their own market share and technology instead of doing what's right for the web as a whole.
null
0
1545370717
False
0
ec8ehc0
t3_a7k0an
null
null
t1_ec4ieu1
/r/programming/comments/a7k0an/did_google_cripple_edges_youtube_performance/ec8ehc0/
1547878043
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
jvatic
t2_7e54q
I’m curious why you have “no other choice but to use Chrome”? I’m also a developer and haven’t found Firefox lacking for the vast majority of things (and most of the time when I do find it lacking, Chrome isn’t any better), so I’m genuinely curious as to why this would be the case for you.
null
0
1544204796
False
0
ebawn62
t3_a3t3rg
null
null
t1_ebauhfm
/r/programming/comments/a3t3rg/goodbye_edgehtml_the_mozilla_blog/ebawn62/
1547312652
8
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
stronghup
t2_3mx3u
This might be one reason to do it. Personally I think MS has gotten much more developer friendly of late, with Windows SubSystem for Linux for example, on Windows 10 only (I assume)
null
0
1545370766
False
0
ec8eivo
t3_a7rdpt
null
null
t1_ec75gkw
/r/programming/comments/a7rdpt/microsoft_unveils_windows_sandbox_run_any_app_in/ec8eivo/
1547878062
2
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
drysart
t2_3kikg
It's helpful to know if someone is coming from a position of informed reason or a position of blind dogma because it tells you how much weight you should give to their opinion. A broken clock might be right twice a day, but that doesn't make it a good clock at those two times a day. It's still a broken clock, even if it happens to have the correct time *right now*.
null
0
1544204837
False
0
ebawp2r
t3_a3whn0
null
null
t1_ebaulu7
/r/programming/comments/a3whn0/you_dont_need_pwa_or_amp_to_make_your_website/ebawp2r/
1547312675
6
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
shoot_your_eye_out
t2_gqowy
Totally agree. Also having written a video rendering pipeline at one point, rendering has all but written itself out of the performance equation. Compared to encoding or decoding video--or even doing a basic YCbCr to ARGB conversion--it's generally a rounding error. Amdahl's law applies.
null
0
1545370835
False
0
ec8ekxt
t3_a7k0an
null
null
t1_ec484sf
/r/programming/comments/a7k0an/did_google_cripple_edges_youtube_performance/ec8ekxt/
1547878087
2
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
Drashown
t2_1nljv42a
Gitlab.com still has performance issues. But if you self host Gitlab it’s very fast.
null
0
1544204852
False
0
ebawprr
t3_a40weq
null
null
t1_ebau4io
/r/programming/comments/a40weq/goldman_sachs_invests_20_million_in_devops_firm/ebawprr/
1547312683
2
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
shoot_your_eye_out
t2_gqowy
Which means 98% equates to hundreds of millions or even billions of users.
null
0
1545370901
1545371363
0
ec8emwy
t3_a7k0an
null
null
t1_ec4xjkt
/r/programming/comments/a7k0an/did_google_cripple_edges_youtube_performance/ec8emwy/
1547878111
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
[deleted]
None
[deleted]
null
1
1544204927
False
0
ebawt7r
t3_a40weq
null
null
t1_ebawm5p
/r/programming/comments/a40weq/goldman_sachs_invests_20_million_in_devops_firm/ebawt7r/
1547312726
-3
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
mpyne
t2_3w2b6
Our government was the one saying the Supermicro story was freaking bullshit. This isn't even one of those outlandish claims. We've known that China (and other countries) have been trying to hack our military and defense-related networks for some time. This isn't news as much as it's yet more specific corroboration.
null
0
1545370927
False
0
ec8enp9
t3_a857kr
null
null
t1_ec8e4ne
/r/programming/comments/a857kr/china_hacked_hpe_ibm_and_then_attacked_clients/ec8enp9/
1547878121
4
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
jamra06
t2_imx1z
I’m assuming that using an in house hosted one would be way faster since you’re not sharing anything with the horde of cloud users
null
0
1544204939
False
0
ebawttd
t3_a40weq
null
null
t1_ebau4io
/r/programming/comments/a40weq/goldman_sachs_invests_20_million_in_devops_firm/ebawttd/
1547312734
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
AboutHelpTools3
t2_hqgxr
There should be a subreddit for specifically these type of stuff, showcases of what a program does.
null
0
1545370985
False
0
ec8epk3
t3_a83zjo
null
null
t3_a83zjo
/r/programming/comments/a83zjo/1_year_of_c/ec8epk3/
1547878144
7
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
azCC
t2_1m70wfbg
Hmm, maybe this is something I'll start doing in a blog. It's nice to have multiple resources, but the Mozilla docs are very good on their own. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Tools
null
0
1544204947
False
0
ebawu6r
t3_a3t3rg
null
null
t1_ebar1od
/r/programming/comments/a3t3rg/goodbye_edgehtml_the_mozilla_blog/ebawu6r/
1547312739
2
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
hopfield
t2_15y1ak
If I remember correctly there’s a TypeScript runtime called Deno that’s in development that runs arbitrary code imported from URLs In other words you call `import github.com/hi.ts` in your source code and it will download and run it when you run your program This attack would wreck programs like that
null
0
1545371017
False
0
ec8eqi4
t3_a82nec
null
null
t1_ec89a7u
/r/programming/comments/a82nec/this_github_url_makes_it_look_like_linux_has_a/ec8eqi4/
1547878156
10
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
thilehoffer
t2_3d98o
But Microsoft doesn't need to monetize GitHub to make money. Microsoft bought GitHub to get developers into the Microsoft Ecosystem. They will use GitHub to promote Azure Services.
null
0
1544204949
False
0
ebawu9z
t3_a40weq
null
null
t1_ebavd68
/r/programming/comments/a40weq/goldman_sachs_invests_20_million_in_devops_firm/ebawu9z/
1547312740
10
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
[deleted]
None
Dad
null
0
1545371153
False
0
ec8euno
t3_a83zjo
null
null
t1_ec8dvnl
/r/programming/comments/a83zjo/1_year_of_c/ec8euno/
1547878234
7
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null