archived
stringclasses
2 values
author
stringlengths
3
20
author_fullname
stringlengths
4
12
body
stringlengths
0
22.5k
comment_type
stringclasses
1 value
controversiality
stringclasses
2 values
created_utc
stringlengths
10
10
edited
stringlengths
4
12
gilded
stringclasses
7 values
id
stringlengths
1
7
link_id
stringlengths
7
10
locked
stringclasses
2 values
name
stringlengths
4
10
parent_id
stringlengths
5
10
permalink
stringlengths
41
91
retrieved_on
stringlengths
10
10
score
stringlengths
1
4
subreddit_id
stringclasses
1 value
subreddit_name_prefixed
stringclasses
1 value
subreddit_type
stringclasses
1 value
total_awards_received
stringclasses
19 values
False
0b_0101_001_1010
t2_155rs2
Release builds are sometimes faster because the optimizations enabled allow LLVM to remove a lot of code early, which results in less work to do down the pipeline. Basically, doing optimizations is more expensive than not doing optimizations per unit of code that you have to process. Some optimizations significantly reduce the amount of code to process.
null
0
1544180364
False
0
eba4hae
t3_a3ps00
null
null
t1_eb9rs9y
/r/programming/comments/a3ps00/rust_2018_is_here_but_what_is_it/eba4hae/
1547299477
3
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
HeadAche2012
t2_873xv
Imagine a game, it is rendered at 320x240, then upscaled to 640x480 — this is exactly how Microsoft handles high DPI, does the image look better? Does doing this automatically make your code better?
null
0
1545334658
False
0
ec78ll5
t3_a7temr
null
null
t1_ec77bm8
/r/programming/comments/a7temr/win16_for_fun_and_probably_no_profit/ec78ll5/
1547858489
-1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
hexapodium
t2_3xr96
Governments have sovereign immunity, theoretically counterbalanced by democratic accountability to their citizens instead of legal accountability to the appropriate authorities. The idea is that they play nice even though there's no direct sanction for not doing so, because the voters will punish a government that acts badly and replace it with one that doesn't. Part of "acting properly" includes implementing voluntary oversight mechanisms (things like the FISA court, congressional committees, etc) but obviously those have to have teeth in terms of there being internal sanction for constituent bits of the government acting badly, and in turn voters are supposed to need to see those bad actors getting punished. As it stands, the average citizen of pretty much anywhere seems to not give a fuck about it, and so the sovereign immunity/democratic accountability balance breaks down. But that's (one of) the rationales for sovereign immunity.
null
0
1544180438
False
0
eba4iw3
t3_a3v0ve
null
null
t1_eb9x7bu
/r/programming/comments/a3v0ve/facebook_engineers_discovered_technique_of_adding/eba4iw3/
1547299497
2
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
s73v3r
t2_3c7qc
I don't think so. Just about everything we do can be difficult. So why is it this, which is usually something that is genuinely useful to just about everybody, as opposed to most of the bullshit features and designs we work on, the thing that we say are too hard?
null
0
1545334664
False
0
ec78lw1
t3_a7xwy3
null
null
t1_ec73sfe
/r/programming/comments/a7xwy3/theres_already_a_blueprint_for_a_more_accessible/ec78lw1/
1547858493
12
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
flying-sheep
t2_5jc4c
But that’s also fine right? If each of these config files hits the sweet spot of complexity, having 20 files is a good way to deal with this!
null
0
1544180557
False
0
eba4lgx
t3_a3q7y5
null
null
t1_eb8v2er
/r/programming/comments/a3q7y5/what_is_wrong_with_toml/eba4lgx/
1547299528
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
grauenwolf
t2_570j
My degree is not in database design so it's not relevant to this topic. However, my multiple decades of work experience is.
null
0
1545334728
False
0
ec78oth
t3_a7q1bi
null
null
t1_ec78giv
/r/programming/comments/a7q1bi/bye_bye_mongo_hello_postgres/ec78oth/
1547858530
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
hp0
t2_32982
You are correct. But if any government allowed facebook or google to fail. IE by introducing laws forcing them to pay fair taxes and then the company refused to trade in that nation. Then they are large enouth that many voters would be annoyed and blame the government of the day for them closing.
null
0
1544180668
False
0
eba4nsq
t3_a3v0ve
null
null
t1_eb9wxhy
/r/programming/comments/a3v0ve/facebook_engineers_discovered_technique_of_adding/eba4nsq/
1547299558
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
MyWorkAccountThisIs
t2_5xozc
One, this general attitude is pretty common. They make the technology so surely it's their fault, right? It's *always* the developer's fault. Two, it can happen by proxy. Most projects - internal, external, or contract - have a budget. Most also start with some type of desired feature set. When a developer has to take those features and translate them in to tangible tasks with time estimates some features will start to get pulled. Again, not directly, but if a feature is really expensive it may get cut if management doesn't see the value.
null
0
1545334766
False
0
ec78qn3
t3_a7xwy3
null
null
t1_ec73l3t
/r/programming/comments/a7xwy3/theres_already_a_blueprint_for_a_more_accessible/ec78qn3/
1547858552
13
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
cosplayingAsHumAn
t2_14cc6bet
Maybe we should change the roles. We have a person with a degree in the field that they're working on and then someone else who actually writes the law.
null
0
1544180832
False
0
eba4qsa
t3_a3kk7u
null
null
t1_eb7kipf
/r/programming/comments/a3kk7u/australian_programmers_could_be_fired_by_their/eba4qsa/
1547299594
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
DRailed
t2_628wy
Because the bullshit features generally make money is the unfortunate truth of the matter. If this made money people would spend the money implementing the features. I would love the disability enablement features too, but they seem like a fair bit of work.
null
0
1545334864
False
0
ec78vd7
t3_a7xwy3
null
null
t1_ec78lw1
/r/programming/comments/a7xwy3/theres_already_a_blueprint_for_a_more_accessible/ec78vd7/
1547858610
18
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
dindonsan
t2_1ogn4gsf
This. I thought this kind of thread would exist only on Facebook, but apparently they happen here too. Sadly.
null
1
1544180865
False
0
eba4reb
t3_a3v0ve
null
null
t1_eba21pz
/r/programming/comments/a3v0ve/facebook_engineers_discovered_technique_of_adding/eba4reb/
1547299602
2
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
MyWorkAccountThisIs
t2_5xozc
Similarly, I think my job is to be the best developer I can. That may or may not align with business goals. > Mgt: We need feature X. > Dev: Users hate that, will slow down the site, and is a possible security hole. > Mgt: Do it. > Dev: Coming right up, sir! But you gotta do what you gotta do. It sucks because those decisions are usually shitty to develop as well. So you get a double dose of shit. I'm sure I have a line somewhere but I haven't had to test it yet. The shitty demands are just shitty. Not outright evil.
null
0
1545334965
False
0
ec790db
t3_a7xwy3
null
null
t1_ec75ugp
/r/programming/comments/a7xwy3/theres_already_a_blueprint_for_a_more_accessible/ec790db/
1547858672
43
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
Magnesus
t2_4inzq
No, because the headline is a lie. They just discussed how to use the new permission system in Android properly.
null
0
1544180884
False
0
eba4rrg
t3_a3v0ve
null
null
t1_eb9x5r1
/r/programming/comments/a3v0ve/facebook_engineers_discovered_technique_of_adding/eba4rrg/
1547299606
19
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
myplacedk
t2_3bm4x
I noticed a huge overlap between making website disability-friendly and just plain high quality work. If you have a good user-friendly design and proper high quality code, it's very easy to be complainant with at least the most relevant levels of all the standards I know of. So that's my incentive: If this is hard, you're doing something wrong that you should fix anyway. It was similar for SEO when I worked with it. Forget the books, seminars, consultants etc. Just write good code and don't try to cheat. It might be different now, it's been out of my hands at my work for a while.
null
0
1545334984
1545335181
0
ec791ap
t3_a7xwy3
null
null
t1_ec6svyo
/r/programming/comments/a7xwy3/theres_already_a_blueprint_for_a_more_accessible/ec791ap/
1547858683
15
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
I_AM_ALWAYS_ANGRY
t2_ojxo4
Yeah
null
0
1544180905
False
0
eba4s5n
t3_a3v0ve
null
null
t1_eba4ei4
/r/programming/comments/a3v0ve/facebook_engineers_discovered_technique_of_adding/eba4s5n/
1547299611
16
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
omfgtim_
t2_f1esg
I have and everything you’ve said can be mitigated by making it a priority and planning and building for it like you do any other feature. If you personally had an accessibility requirement, I think you’d be more understanding.
null
0
1545335007
False
0
ec792d6
t3_a7xwy3
null
null
t1_ec73sfe
/r/programming/comments/a7xwy3/theres_already_a_blueprint_for_a_more_accessible/ec792d6/
1547858698
29
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
wyld_tangynts
t2_td70z
I've laundered so much more money now that each heist is laid out as a User Story!
null
0
1544180965
False
0
eba4t98
t3_a3kk7u
null
null
t1_eb86c89
/r/programming/comments/a3kk7u/australian_programmers_could_be_fired_by_their/eba4t98/
1547299624
6
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
TikiTDO
t2_3yp3u
There's no "blueprint" for anything. There's a mountain of opt-in specifications, with a bigger mountain of best practices, an even bigger mountain of opinions about how to implement best practices, competing with the constant flux of feature requests, bugs, and changing priorities that developers have to deal with in the first place. Then when these developers that are not familiar with, and have never used these features end up implementing them poorly, there's even more noise about how these horrible developers are "almost criminal." It's easy to sit on a high horse on a well staffed, well funded project that can afford to have an accessibility team that is larger than many companies' entire development team. It's much harder to justify a major time investment to train, implement, and validate a consistent and robust accessibility strategy when this means taking a significant amount of developer resources off of some critical features for weeks or months, all to target a tiny fraction of the population. A fraction that is quite a bit smaller than the "15% of the world’s population who experience some form of disability" the article suggests, since they decided to count people considered disabled for reasons such as chronic pain, impaired mobility, and psychological issues. When you look at the more realistic ~5% figure for people that are visually impaired or dealing with a learning disability it becomes much harder to justify such an effort for anyone that doesn't have access to a large pool of resources like a major corporation of a government entity. You know who *could* do something about it? A company with billions of dollars to spend, experience scraping every single public-facing site on the internet, and some background with machine learning and visual image recognition such as what you would get building a giant search engine, and then branching off into things like voice recognition, language analysis and translation, and the image recognition tooling needed for self-driving cars. In other words, you don't solve problems by demanding that everyone do a lot of extra work out of the goodness of their hearts, you do so by creating systems that can leverage the existing environment to solve a problem. In this day and age we have all the tools necessary to solve this challenge. If there is appetite for such changes among the leaders of the industry, they should really be putting forth the resources to solve the issue, not complaining that everyone else is being mean by not taking on a lot of extra work.
null
0
1545335065
1545335257
0
ec7957h
t3_a7xwy3
null
null
t3_a7xwy3
/r/programming/comments/a7xwy3/theres_already_a_blueprint_for_a_more_accessible/ec7957h/
1547858732
152
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
[deleted]
None
[deleted]
null
0
1544181128
False
0
eba4wdq
t3_a3v0ve
null
null
t1_eb9sqnf
/r/programming/comments/a3v0ve/facebook_engineers_discovered_technique_of_adding/eba4wdq/
1547299664
-9
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
[deleted]
None
[deleted]
null
0
1545335070
False
0
ec795e2
t3_a805nk
null
null
t3_a805nk
/r/programming/comments/a805nk/slack_massbanning_accounts_originating_in/ec795e2/
1547858735
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
jonbristow
t2_eeu0q
shut up with your logic. we want to circlejerk how zuck is evil and how great my life is since I deleted facebook, but still use instagram, whatsapp, reddit
null
0
1544181225
False
0
eba4y77
t3_a3v0ve
null
null
t1_eba0fgl
/r/programming/comments/a3v0ve/facebook_engineers_discovered_technique_of_adding/eba4y77/
1547299686
27
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
dvdkon
t2_dj4da
Nobody hates backwards compatibility per se, but it causes a lot of problems when kept for so long. No code gets changed, nothing is removed, all new things are just piled on top of existing code. Wait a few years and you've got a mess, because there are layers of new code dealing with new problems and paradigms intertwined with each other and still coexisting with the oldest APIs.
null
0
1545335119
False
0
ec797s2
t3_a7temr
null
null
t1_ec6zb04
/r/programming/comments/a7temr/win16_for_fun_and_probably_no_profit/ec797s2/
1547858765
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
floatboth
t2_yi3tr
It is open, it's just weird.
null
0
1544181261
False
0
eba4yvi
t3_a3v0ve
null
null
t1_eba38bb
/r/programming/comments/a3v0ve/facebook_engineers_discovered_technique_of_adding/eba4yvi/
1547299695
3
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
EvilTony
t2_45bxh
I would probably put the document in some kind of blob storage or file system and then just have the database store a pointer to it or enough information that you can determine the location in the storage. I don't a row in a relational database is a good place for an article, but might be good for storing other information related to it.
null
0
1545335180
False
0
ec79aoa
t3_a7q1bi
null
null
t1_ec5skzs
/r/programming/comments/a7q1bi/bye_bye_mongo_hello_postgres/ec79aoa/
1547858800
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
combinatorylogic
t2_iab4d
> Apache BCEL is not commonly used by the average Java community and you know it. Sure. Yet, an average Java developer won't yell "heresy!" if something relying on BCEL is committed to his code base. > Code generation can literally be writing Python source code if your original source is non-Python. Even generating a (very bloated and ill designed) Python AST is easier, Python syntax is a notoriously inconvenient code generation target. Not to mention that a text-based code generation is just a very bad approach in general. > And the fact that the Python AST is not clean at all, as 1+1 gives you like seven nested classes. Yes, that's another big issue, especially combined with the complete lack of pattern matching, writing code transformers in Python is an awful experience. > You give up on your ideas of improving Python this way. Exactly. The problem is, for me a language that I cannot build upon is just a useless language. I'd have to waste an order of magnitude more effort to do things that I can do much easier if a proper metaprogramming is available. And the people who push Python everywhere as the ultimate solution to the programmers productivity just fail to see how primitive and un-productive their solution is. > The fact is, that has nothing to do with the Zen. Take a look at Converge - it's very similar to Python, but made free of those beliefs that are crippling the Python community. You can clearly see how much bigger potential (in terms of productivity) this approach have. Zen must have influenced a lot the decisions that made Python community to stick to their ways. > Just as the GIL has nothing to do with the Zen. In fact, GIL is the least of my concerns. It's not a big show stopper in those kinds of tasks Python is supposed to solve anyway. A very similar issue in OCaml, for example, does not matter much - I prefer a multi-process model with a message passing to threads sharing memory. > What you are alluding to is the existence of a standardised JVM. And that's a crucial requirement for metaprogramming. If your underlying language is so loosely defined, you cannot do much. > The number of senior people in the community trying to fix this (or the GIL) is staggering. Standartising a *simple* AST would have been quite an obvious first step. Would be delighted to see anyone trying to actually push it through.
null
0
1544181428
False
0
eba520d
t3_a2hpd8
null
null
t1_eb8116a
/r/programming/comments/a2hpd8/is_lisp_a_good_language_to_start_learning_as_a/eba520d/
1547299734
2
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
[deleted]
None
[deleted]
null
0
1545335187
False
0
ec79azo
t3_a7q1bi
null
null
t1_ec5skzs
/r/programming/comments/a7q1bi/bye_bye_mongo_hello_postgres/ec79azo/
1547858804
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
floatboth
t2_yi3tr
> built on top of AES, SHA, and AES-IGE Yeah, IGE is one of the parts that experts consider weird. Literally no one else uses this obscure mode. But like.. who cares. I don't even use secret chats really. Synced history between devices, saved messages, channels, bots — that's the good stuff!
null
0
1544181473
False
0
eba52u2
t3_a3v0ve
null
null
t1_eb9w649
/r/programming/comments/a3v0ve/facebook_engineers_discovered_technique_of_adding/eba52u2/
1547299743
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
omfgtim_
t2_f1esg
Accessibility support should cater for more needs than just visually impaired
null
1
1545335189
False
0
ec79b31
t3_a7xwy3
null
null
t1_ec6uz9s
/r/programming/comments/a7xwy3/theres_already_a_blueprint_for_a_more_accessible/ec79b31/
1547858805
0
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
zickige_zicke
t2_2n677xf8
it has nothing to do with bad redesign but the words they chose and why.
null
1
1544181481
False
0
eba52zd
t3_a3q3e2
null
null
t1_eba4efe
/r/programming/comments/a3q3e2/rust_131_and_rust_2018/eba52zd/
1547299745
5
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
snowe2010
t2_53c7i
Yeah there's no way there are blind Executive Assistants or CFOs that need to buy vehicle fleets. I would think a car dealership would be very interested in selling many vehicles to a business, even if the employee they have to deal with at that business is blind. Once again, all of this is proving the point of the article. Even if you think your situation won't help out many people, you are probably wrong. edit: could someone explain the downvotes, because as it is, it sounds like y'all are downvoting to disagree, but I don't really see why you would disagree.
null
0
1545335209
1545342438
0
ec79c22
t3_a7xwy3
null
null
t1_ec708w3
/r/programming/comments/a7xwy3/theres_already_a_blueprint_for_a_more_accessible/ec79c22/
1547858817
-7
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
inu-no-policemen
t2_yh2ls
"exceeds authorized access" Looks pretty clear to me. > They released an update which changed the permissions automatically. By using an exploit which allowed them to do that without asking the user. They exceeded their authorized access.
null
0
1544181496
False
0
eba53a7
t3_a3v0ve
null
null
t1_eba0id2
/r/programming/comments/a3v0ve/facebook_engineers_discovered_technique_of_adding/eba53a7/
1547299749
13
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
netsec_burn
t2_bu1u4
How has Internet Explorer not been released? \> It affects 9, 10, and 11
null
0
1545335216
False
0
ec79cds
t3_a80ypr
null
null
t1_ec75arc
/r/programming/comments/a80ypr/internet_explorer_zero_day_exploited_in_attacks/ec79cds/
1547858821
25
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
Narcil4
t2_rqosd
just because it says it's typically made by governments doesn't mean it ONLY applies to governments...
null
0
1544181508
False
0
eba53ic
t3_a3v0ve
null
null
t1_eb9zz6x
/r/programming/comments/a3v0ve/facebook_engineers_discovered_technique_of_adding/eba53ic/
1547299752
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
MyWorkAccountThisIs
t2_5xozc
> ITT: Bunch of developers who are completely ignorant about ~~accessibility~~ literally anything and hostile to it because they don't know anything about it. I'm a dev and I work with devs at a dev shop. We - because it's not fair to not include myself - can be absolute shits. It's infuriating. Arrogant, stubborn, pedantic, argumentative shits. Plus, there are surprising amount of devs that still think design/UI/UX don't matter.
null
1
1545335254
False
0
ec79e77
t3_a7xwy3
null
null
t1_ec71ser
/r/programming/comments/a7xwy3/theres_already_a_blueprint_for_a_more_accessible/ec79e77/
1547858843
2
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
inu-no-policemen
t2_yh2ls
> why not Facespook? Too clever.
null
0
1544181558
False
0
eba54iw
t3_a3v0ve
null
null
t1_eb9it65
/r/programming/comments/a3v0ve/facebook_engineers_discovered_technique_of_adding/eba54iw/
1547299764
3
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
Fluffcake
t2_eunun
More often than not, you will find that this is not the reason, and someone already dumped a few months of their life into trying to make it, but ran into an unresolvable issue that is buried just deep enough that won't find it before you have committed and wasted a ton of time. I just wish someone made a public list of these...
null
0
1545335370
1545335633
0
ec79jr7
t3_a7nggt
null
null
t1_ec6eetv
/r/programming/comments/a7nggt/netflix_standardizes_on_spring_boot_as_java/ec79jr7/
1547858913
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
HairyEyebrows
t2_4dsew
OK. It's applied CS.
null
0
1544181567
False
0
eba54pf
t3_a3yzks
null
null
t3_a3yzks
/r/programming/comments/a3yzks/web_development_computer_science/eba54pf/
1547299767
16
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
MyWorkAccountThisIs
t2_5xozc
It is very quickly becoming a consideration though. Our QA department has had a huge uptick in a11y testing.
null
0
1545335371
False
0
ec79jtb
t3_a7xwy3
null
null
t1_ec701ty
/r/programming/comments/a7xwy3/theres_already_a_blueprint_for_a_more_accessible/ec79jtb/
1547858914
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
not_american_ffs
t2_cod51
Are there any technical details on this exploit?
null
0
1544181603
False
0
eba55eu
t3_a3v0ve
null
null
t1_eb9s90b
/r/programming/comments/a3v0ve/facebook_engineers_discovered_technique_of_adding/eba55eu/
1547299804
2
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
KFCConspiracy
t2_ai139
Maybe some edge intern will find some way to blame this on Google.
null
0
1545335380
False
0
ec79k8r
t3_a80ypr
null
null
t3_a80ypr
/r/programming/comments/a80ypr/internet_explorer_zero_day_exploited_in_attacks/ec79k8r/
1547858919
-30
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
MINIMAN10001
t2_15mrcb
Already read a blog about it.
null
0
1544181618
False
0
eba55ox
t3_a3lvtr
null
null
t1_eb9yqvs
/r/programming/comments/a3lvtr/c20_standard_ranges_eric_niebler/eba55ox/
1547299807
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
defenastrator
t2_5q21f
Website audio accessibility is not useful to anyone who is not blind. Googlebot wants more meta tagging and doesn't care about streamlining of the dom tree and in many cases would be hindered by it. Even websites design well for use by the blind are 10x slower to use when using audio to navigate. The rest I can agree but as a computer programmer with a few blind friends trust me they want/need something completely counter to what everyone else wants and even getting a page to render well in all browsers while being easy to navigate for the blind is an exercise in futility. Screen readers need to get hella more sophisticated before attempting to design for them is practical. The path for accessibility for the blind is Google assistant, Alexa and Siri integration not trying to design your website around readers.
null
0
1545335449
False
0
ec79nlk
t3_a7xwy3
null
null
t1_ec71cw5
/r/programming/comments/a7xwy3/theres_already_a_blueprint_for_a_more_accessible/ec79nlk/
1547858960
18
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
antonio-tomac
t2_knjth
It's not that scp is too slow, but scp can't use multiple connections for single copy, and it can't skip some portions of the data which are already equal on the source and destination.
null
0
1544181652
False
0
eba56ec
t3_a3ncyb
null
null
t1_eb92osl
/r/programming/comments/a3ncyb/parallel_remote_copy_aka_data_migration_on/eba56ec/
1547299816
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
glacialthinker
t2_77yrw
I spent the first 7 years of my gamedev career using C and asm. I would prefer to use C over C++ for games. I know it feels like a step back, and things *are* missed, but there are subtle gains in overall architecture... the lack of classes really pushes to functions working on data and removes the candy-gloss temptation of encapsulating everything -- and it's this thick candy layer which bloats a lot of C++ code. I am compelled to do it to... all while recognizing such slippery slopes or traps as natural to the language's feature-set. When I work in C++ it feels like code is 20% function, 80% fluff/boilerplate/acrobatics. This comes to mind every time I'm writing adaptors to some "interface" or workarounds to existing functionality hiding in classes. Whereas in C the code is mostly *getting stuff done* -- what else are you going to write? Lack of "generics" certainly adds verbosity to both C and Go, though in C you can use `void\*` with functions/delegates that know how to handle the real data type. Not safe, but practical, and you never mistake in C that you're somehow typesafe (or you shouldn't). That said, C is a pretty sad choice too. I like the language for embedded, resource constrained, and small tasks. That's where it's characteristics shine. That's also what old game-console development really was too. Even though C enjoys success with modern complex \*nix kernels, and it can likewise be used for complex games, we can certainly do better. C is a language for expressing machine operations rather than high-level intent. Once we're above the hardware interfaces, writing complex systems to be reused, maintained, and expanded... an expressive typesystem is something I want at my back. In this regard, I see C++ as a half-broken hodge-podge. It hinders rather than helps (even makes some people hate *types*). While "niceties" like implicit conversion help to erode confidence.
null
0
1545335454
False
0
ec79nsa
t3_a7rit7
null
null
t1_ec72543
/r/programming/comments/a7rit7/computerphile_asks_university_proffessors_about/ec79nsa/
1547858962
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
[deleted]
None
[deleted]
null
0
1544181811
False
0
eba59je
t3_a3yzks
null
null
t3_a3yzks
/r/programming/comments/a3yzks/web_development_computer_science/eba59je/
1547299854
-2
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
tragicshark
t2_gv2h2
Actually the contrast ratio is not good enough according to Axe. The text color for most of the text is #c9d1ef and the background color is #4c66c8 which gives a contrast of 3.42:1; WCAG expects 4.5:1 (WCAG 1.4.3). Other issues: * there are 3 elements matching the id selector #Rectangle-Copy-6 (WCAG 4.1.1) * the signup email text box doesn't have a label (WCAG 3.3.2) * a readonly text box presumably used for sharing doesn't have a label (WCAG 3.3.2) and then a dozen others that Deque recommends but aren't WCAG rules. https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/axe/lhdoppojpmngadmnindnejefpokejbdd?hl=en-US
null
0
1545335476
False
0
ec79oth
t3_a7xwy3
null
null
t1_ec6p63v
/r/programming/comments/a7xwy3/theres_already_a_blueprint_for_a_more_accessible/ec79oth/
1547859002
9
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
[deleted]
None
[deleted]
null
1
1544181831
1544194442
0
eba59x7
t3_a3whn0
null
null
t3_a3whn0
/r/programming/comments/a3whn0/you_dont_need_pwa_or_amp_to_make_your_website/eba59x7/
1547299859
-2
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
EarLil
t2_ovtgy
exactly that
null
0
1545335543
False
0
ec79rzs
t3_a7x9fj
null
null
t1_ec74v9n
/r/programming/comments/a7x9fj/war_story_the_mystery_of_the_very_long_gc_pauses/ec79rzs/
1547859041
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
liberal_libertarian
t2_3gr1j
When did that change?
null
0
1544182084
False
0
eba5etn
t3_a3v0ve
null
null
t1_eba4yvi
/r/programming/comments/a3v0ve/facebook_engineers_discovered_technique_of_adding/eba5etn/
1547299920
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
SanityInAnarchy
t2_5oygg
I'm sure that's part of it, but most traditional SQL databases don't actually scale to the level needed here, at least not without so much extra machinery that you may as well be running a different kind of database. Postgres didn't even have streaming replication built in until after Mongo was already around.
null
0
1545335544
False
0
ec79s0y
t3_a7q1bi
null
null
t1_ec6vfq5
/r/programming/comments/a7q1bi/bye_bye_mongo_hello_postgres/ec79s0y/
1547859041
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
rekIfdyt2
t2_7jmd3dk
I feel your pain, as I was an avid Vimperator user and now there's nothing that even comes close to it. However, look at the situation in the context of EdgeHTML being abandoned: that is happening because Microsoft (a company with a revenue 200 times that of Mozilla) has decided that it's uneconomical for them to continue developing their own browser engine. Obviously, it's not the case that they can't literally afford to do it, and unlike in the case of Mozilla, the browser isn't their core product[1]; nevertheless the cost was sufficiently large that they've decided to give up on something that was[2] long a central part of Windows and over which Microsoft had risked several anti-trust cases. Developing a Web Browser that keeps up with all Web standards[3] (HTML, javascript, WebAssembly, CSS, WebRTC etc.) and is secure, is, simply put, extraordinarily expensive. Having a situation where add-ons can depend on and modify arbitrary internal parts of your browser[4], meaning that a) any browser development will break add-ons, so your software engineers would be hesitant making even essential changes and b) the add-ons can inadvertently create various security holes in your browser, for which you would blamed and would have to deal with, makes the cost prohibitive. In that context, Mozilla's actions wrt Add-ons and WebExtensions become (IMO) more comprehensible. If the alternative is folding ship entirely, and hence completely abandoning your entire user base, then partially abandoning ~ 1 % of your users (even if they are the most dedicated), becomes slightly less of a horrible decision. Also, they have been adding APIs to support functionality initially lost in the WebExtension transition. For instance, a tab hiding API, making Panorama-like add-ons possible again, and a side-bar for TreeStyle Tabs. [1] but if I were to have guessed, I'd have said that it was far more that 1/200th of their product... [2] or, technically, something whose direct ancestor (IE) was [3] whether we really need this constant churn is another matter — IMO we don't — but Web developers around the world have decided otherwise so unless you want your browser to eventually become incompatible with most websites, you need to keep up with it. [4] as was the case for pre-webextension Firefox
null
0
1544182188
False
0
eba5gvg
t3_a3t3rg
null
null
t1_eb9tzyb
/r/programming/comments/a3t3rg/goodbye_edgehtml_the_mozilla_blog/eba5gvg/
1547299945
12
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
EWJacobs
t2_bash7
It seems like trolls that do nothing but go around adding this bs to node projects then trying to guilt people into keeping them.
null
0
1545335547
False
0
ec79s6u
t3_a7z5ni
null
null
t1_ec72yq6
/r/programming/comments/a7z5ni/why_dependencies_are_ing_you_over_and_over_again/ec79s6u/
1547859043
3
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
Anders_A
t2_64n9m
Seriously? Do I have to read a 250 page pdf to figure out which operating system we're talking about? /r/titlegore
null
0
1544182200
False
0
eba5h41
t3_a3v0ve
null
null
t3_a3v0ve
/r/programming/comments/a3v0ve/facebook_engineers_discovered_technique_of_adding/eba5h41/
1547299948
-1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
snowe2010
t2_53c7i
>I suspect that improving SEO would've resulted in the same 30% spike Yeah, by adding transcripts. Google prioritizes accessibility, because it makes it easier for their spiders to scrape. I don't really see why that's such a big leap to make.
null
0
1545335595
False
0
ec79ugq
t3_a7xwy3
null
null
t1_ec6v7zs
/r/programming/comments/a7xwy3/theres_already_a_blueprint_for_a_more_accessible/ec79ugq/
1547859072
2
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
dnesteruk
t2_4c542
It's not the same thing though. The `|` is still `or` in most programmers' minds.
null
0
1544182229
False
0
eba5hoe
t3_a3lvtr
null
null
t1_eb8youb
/r/programming/comments/a3lvtr/c20_standard_ranges_eric_niebler/eba5hoe/
1547299955
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
tragicshark
t2_gv2h2
Yep (and it is worse than you are imagining). If you have windows 10, you can try it yourself with Narrator press Ctrl+Win+Enter
null
0
1545335657
False
0
ec79xhl
t3_a7xwy3
null
null
t1_ec702fx
/r/programming/comments/a7xwy3/theres_already_a_blueprint_for_a_more_accessible/ec79xhl/
1547859109
4
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
Anders_A
t2_64n9m
Which version(s) of android?
null
0
1544182240
False
0
eba5hvu
t3_a3v0ve
null
null
t1_eb9l7rw
/r/programming/comments/a3v0ve/facebook_engineers_discovered_technique_of_adding/eba5hvu/
1547299957
2
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
IGarFieldI
t2_b41wh
Unfortunately it doesn't work everywhere, namely not in the command line :(
null
0
1545335717
False
0
ec7a0dp
t3_a7rdpt
null
null
t1_ec759j5
/r/programming/comments/a7rdpt/microsoft_unveils_windows_sandbox_run_any_app_in/ec7a0dp/
1547859144
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
chucker23n
t2_39t9i
>We will evolve the Microsoft Edge app architecture, enabling distribution to all supported versions of Windows including Windows 7 and Windows 8, as well as Windows 10. We will also bring Microsoft Edge to other desktop platforms, such as macOS. This means one of three things: 1. they're making additional separate apps for Windows 7, 8, and macOS 2. they're porting UWP to work on Windows 7, 8, and macOS 3. most likely: they're ditching UWP in Edge altogether, probably just using Chromium's app shell instead. That last scenario would mean one of the most significant UWP apps is dead. At this point, is _any_ team in Microsoft left championing that UI framework?
null
0
1544182247
False
0
eba5i0r
t3_a3twpj
null
null
t3_a3twpj
/r/programming/comments/a3twpj/microsoft_created_a_git_document_of_goals_and/eba5i0r/
1547299959
13
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
filleduchaos
t2_7r81qd
> Four years ago Scala was pretty new on the scene Scala was first released in 2004 (only a few years after C#). By 2014 it was already on version 2.10. *Why* do y'all come out so confident about things that are clearly wrong?
null
0
1545335779
False
0
ec7a3bb
t3_a7q1bi
null
null
t1_ec6bz3r
/r/programming/comments/a7q1bi/bye_bye_mongo_hello_postgres/ec7a3bb/
1547859180
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
Okymyo
t2_euv84
But did you know that Facebook is building a new data center next to the NSA in Utah?
null
0
1544182343
False
0
eba5jwd
t3_a3v0ve
null
null
t1_eb9tmmz
/r/programming/comments/a3v0ve/facebook_engineers_discovered_technique_of_adding/eba5jwd/
1547299983
7
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
KFCConspiracy
t2_ai139
What's the first rule of getting information on the internet? You can't believe everything on the internet. Check your sources. Consider your sources. Some guy's social media feed is not a credible source in and of itself.
null
0
1545335805
False
0
ec7a4ix
t3_a805nk
null
null
t1_ec72w44
/r/programming/comments/a805nk/slack_massbanning_accounts_originating_in/ec7a4ix/
1547859195
2
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
rodrigojose690
t2_e4ll9m3
Do what your enemy does is your answer
null
0
1544182828
1544206521
0
eba5tqg
t3_a3t3rg
null
null
t1_eba1aos
/r/programming/comments/a3t3rg/goodbye_edgehtml_the_mozilla_blog/eba5tqg/
1547300104
7
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
snowe2010
t2_53c7i
yeah... that's my point. When I first started using boot it had been out for a few years, but all the results were still XML answers. Now hardly any of the answers I see have XML, and are usually annotation based.
null
0
1545335823
False
0
ec7a5d5
t3_a7nggt
null
null
t1_ec73osh
/r/programming/comments/a7nggt/netflix_standardizes_on_spring_boot_as_java/ec7a5d5/
1547859206
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
ckay1100
t2_q68rm
Yeah
null
0
1544182885
False
0
eba5uyb
t3_a3v0ve
null
null
t1_eba4s5n
/r/programming/comments/a3v0ve/facebook_engineers_discovered_technique_of_adding/eba5uyb/
1547300119
9
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
Ameisen
t2_5qad2
Yes, but the actual binary itself can take advantage of the frontend GPRs.
null
0
1545335982
False
0
ec7acrs
t3_a7temr
null
null
t1_ec74vd5
/r/programming/comments/a7temr/win16_for_fun_and_probably_no_profit/ec7acrs/
1547859297
3
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
AyeGill
t2_52ea0
https://bestmotherfucking.website/
null
0
1544182892
False
0
eba5v2q
t3_a3whn0
null
null
t1_eb9v48j
/r/programming/comments/a3whn0/you_dont_need_pwa_or_amp_to_make_your_website/eba5v2q/
1547300120
56
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
badsectoracula
t2_3jbnd
Ideally this would force developers to think twice before piling new stuff or changing stuff and when they do, the old API implementations would use the new functionality. And TBH i do not see a problem with not removing anything (from the side of API users) and not changing code... at the end of the day the goal of the majority of programs is to accomplish something and if programs using the existing APIs do what their users want to do, why change it?
null
0
1545335996
False
0
ec7addf
t3_a7temr
null
null
t1_ec797s2
/r/programming/comments/a7temr/win16_for_fun_and_probably_no_profit/ec7addf/
1547859305
3
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
slapded
t2_4b896
hope their stock hits zero
null
0
1544183034
False
0
eba5y1h
t3_a3v0ve
null
null
t3_a3v0ve
/r/programming/comments/a3v0ve/facebook_engineers_discovered_technique_of_adding/eba5y1h/
1547300157
2
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
fykac
t2_i080m
has anyone come with a solution for this problem using java? #### The Challenge In this exercise, you're going to decompress a compressed string. Your input is a compressed string of the format number\[string\] and the decompressed output form should be the string written number times. For example: The input 3\[abc\]4\[ab\]c Would be output as abcabcabcababababc ##### Other rules Number can have more than one digit. For example, 10\[a\] is allowed, and just means aaaaaaaaaa One repetition can occur inside another. For example, 2\[3\[a\]b\] decompresses into aaabaaab Characters allowed as input include digits, small English letters and brackets \[ \] . Digits are only to represent amount of repetitions. Letters are just letters. Brackets are only part of syntax of writing repeated substring. Input is always valid, so no need to check its validity. ​
null
0
1545336042
False
0
ec7afkl
t3_a81sm4
null
null
t3_a81sm4
/r/programming/comments/a81sm4/google_interview_question_any_java_solution/ec7afkl/
1547859332
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
[deleted]
None
[deleted]
null
0
1544183111
False
0
eba5zlq
t3_a3v0ve
null
null
t1_eba2k6u
/r/programming/comments/a3v0ve/facebook_engineers_discovered_technique_of_adding/eba5zlq/
1547300176
8
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
xenomachina
t2_7mxhc
I agree with the gist of what you're saying, however... > any other feature ...accessibility, like security and localization, isn't a stand-alone feature. You need to make it a priority and plan for it in virtually every user-facing feature you implement.
null
0
1545336094
False
0
ec7ahzj
t3_a7xwy3
null
null
t1_ec792d6
/r/programming/comments/a7xwy3/theres_already_a_blueprint_for_a_more_accessible/ec7ahzj/
1547859362
70
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
floatboth
t2_yi3tr
The clients were.. always open source I think?? (And encryption happens on the client obviously, that's why secret chats are end-to-end encrypted) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telegram_(service)#Encryption_scheme https://core.telegram.org/mtproto
null
0
1544183248
False
0
eba62ez
t3_a3v0ve
null
null
t1_eba5etn
/r/programming/comments/a3v0ve/facebook_engineers_discovered_technique_of_adding/eba62ez/
1547300211
2
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
ArmoredPancake
t2_jc7zp
Define "slow".
null
0
1545336145
False
0
ec7akej
t3_a7xki7
null
null
t1_ec6wovx
/r/programming/comments/a7xki7/net_core_whats_coming_in_net_core_30/ec7akej/
1547859392
-3
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
0xf3e
t2_z7qv4
Hm, does anyone have an overview of what's left to be re-written in Rust? What other parts still need to be done?
null
0
1544183407
False
0
eba65s8
t3_a3t3rg
null
null
t1_eb9y2vf
/r/programming/comments/a3t3rg/goodbye_edgehtml_the_mozilla_blog/eba65s8/
1547300252
8
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
monsto
t2_52jog
>no business is going to spend the money to support a tiny fraction of the population without ~~regulation~~ profit. FTFY.
null
1
1545336160
False
0
ec7al4d
t3_a7xwy3
null
null
t1_ec6qw3t
/r/programming/comments/a7xwy3/theres_already_a_blueprint_for_a_more_accessible/ec7al4d/
1547859400
-1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
TomSwirly
t2_333rr
> You willingly installed their application, so therefore they could argue that the information obtained was not protected. By that argument, _any_ Trojan is fine - as long as I convince someone to "willingingly install the application", even by lying about what the application was going to do as in this case, I can then do whatever I want to their phone or machine.
null
0
1544183460
False
0
eba66y8
t3_a3v0ve
null
null
t1_eba0id2
/r/programming/comments/a3v0ve/facebook_engineers_discovered_technique_of_adding/eba66y8/
1547300266
3
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
stimulatedneuron
t2_1krjg23e
Understood, but what does that have to do with my comment about catering a website specifically so that the visually impaired can operate it without issues?
null
0
1545336277
False
0
ec7aqot
t3_a7xwy3
null
null
t1_ec79b31
/r/programming/comments/a7xwy3/theres_already_a_blueprint_for_a_more_accessible/ec7aqot/
1547859468
3
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
TomSwirly
t2_333rr
> If you let someone into your home, and they assault you and steal your stuff, then it's not B&E. But it _is_ a felony, so what sort of ridiculous argument is that?
null
0
1544183550
False
0
eba68vy
t3_a3v0ve
null
null
t1_eba1vzg
/r/programming/comments/a3v0ve/facebook_engineers_discovered_technique_of_adding/eba68vy/
1547300290
3
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
Auburus
t2_bmzso
Create a throwaway reddit account and use that. Simple solutions ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
null
0
1545336292
False
0
ec7arcz
t3_a7whml
null
null
t1_ec707zs
/r/programming/comments/a7whml/advent_of_other_peoples_code_a_generic_solution/ec7arcz/
1547859477
7
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
chucker23n
t2_39t9i
So, probably no more UWP in Edge then.
null
0
1544183575
False
0
eba69ez
t3_a3q1vh
null
null
t1_eb9e0a2
/r/programming/comments/a3q1vh/its_official_chromium_is_coming_to_microsoft_edge/eba69ez/
1547300297
3
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
FliesMoreCeilings
t2_i05y7
>"What if I had a disability and I was trying to access this web page? How difficult would that be?" To even ask the question is essentially to answer it I'd honestly have no idea how to answer that question and how to adjust for it. It's a mystery to me how people with disabilities even use software and how that experience can be improved. And even if I did know, as a dev, I have to work within tight limits set by designers/customers, who I imagine have the same knowledge gap. If I'd get a dollar for every time I've made a small usability improvement (like adding labels) only to have it rejected.. In such a situation, what are some of the most essential steps I can take?
null
0
1545336318
False
0
ec7askz
t3_a7xwy3
null
null
t1_ec6y8n1
/r/programming/comments/a7xwy3/theres_already_a_blueprint_for_a_more_accessible/ec7askz/
1547859492
15
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
TomSwirly
t2_333rr
When a user installed this program, the user gave it specific authorizations, which the program then deliberately exceeded. If this is legal, then any malicious Trojan that gets onto your machine and does what it wants by lies and hacking is legal. But there is plenty of legislation and case law that says you're wrong here.
null
0
1544183674
False
0
eba6bii
t3_a3v0ve
null
null
t1_eba3rt8
/r/programming/comments/a3v0ve/facebook_engineers_discovered_technique_of_adding/eba6bii/
1547300323
9
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
SimpleNovelty
t2_121d0lsg
The subset of people buying cars for other people who are blind is small enough to ignore. It'll probably cost more to implement accessibility features than you'll make from blind people buying cars for anyone. It absolutely makes sense not to cater to an insignificant portion of your customer base.
null
0
1545336329
False
0
ec7at1v
t3_a7xwy3
null
null
t1_ec713m3
/r/programming/comments/a7xwy3/theres_already_a_blueprint_for_a_more_accessible/ec7at1v/
1547859498
13
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
cowinabadplace
t2_3xj24
Well, GDPR exists now and no one is suing Facebook out of existence.
null
0
1544183713
False
0
eba6ccl
t3_a3v0ve
null
null
t1_eb9grfu
/r/programming/comments/a3v0ve/facebook_engineers_discovered_technique_of_adding/eba6ccl/
1547300333
2
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
TheCod3r17
t2_cs4ps43
Agreed, you would be forgiven for thinking that Microsoft would learn from internet explorer 9
null
0
1545336349
False
0
ec7au0y
t3_a80ypr
null
null
t1_ec74edm
/r/programming/comments/a80ypr/internet_explorer_zero_day_exploited_in_attacks/ec7au0y/
1547859510
-7
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
kindredfan
t2_wf3x5
Or maybe try firefox?
null
0
1544183773
False
0
eba6dnk
t3_a3q1vh
null
null
t1_eb94qwa
/r/programming/comments/a3q1vh/its_official_chromium_is_coming_to_microsoft_edge/eba6dnk/
1547300349
24
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
Alether
t2_7lhvn
I sure hope for your sake you know how to veil that.
null
0
1545336378
False
0
ec7avcw
t3_a7arbt
null
null
t1_ec72ml6
/r/programming/comments/a7arbt/how_to_write_perfect_python_commandline_interfaces/ec7avcw/
1547859526
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
TomSwirly
t2_333rr
You could have literally taken ten seconds to read a complete definition, which includes "Espionage is often part of an institutional effort by a government or commercial concern," and "Spying involving corporations is known as industrial espionage". Your argument boils down to "industrial espionage isn't espionage". Have you no shame?
null
0
1544183823
False
0
eba6es5
t3_a3v0ve
null
null
t1_eb9zz6x
/r/programming/comments/a3v0ve/facebook_engineers_discovered_technique_of_adding/eba6es5/
1547300363
3
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
ExistentialismFTW
t2_11l2dp
Author here. I love this example. There's a type-coupling/lexical-coupling/dependency-coupling discussion to be had one day along these lines. Today wasn't the day for it, but this is a great alternate line of thought. Thanks.
null
0
1545336433
False
0
ec7axyp
t3_a7zs9p
null
null
t1_ec71iw2
/r/programming/comments/a7zs9p/c_vs_f_what_happened_to_the_promise_of_code_reuse/ec7axyp/
1547859559
3
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
jamra06
t2_imx1z
I think WhatsApp brought in the people from Signal to work on their E2E encryption. I remember reading something along the lines of that several years ago. But the recent leaving from Facebook of one of the WhatsApp cofounders is evidence of the monetization of the product, which scares me. On facebook messenger, there was an assumption that it's over a social network. With WhatsApp, people share very private information. Facebook needs to be shut down.
null
0
1544183877
False
0
eba6fxz
t3_a3v0ve
null
null
t1_eb9xvox
/r/programming/comments/a3v0ve/facebook_engineers_discovered_technique_of_adding/eba6fxz/
1547300407
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
jaker3
t2_3zu2i
I'd like to know this also.
null
0
1545336441
False
0
ec7aydk
t3_a4m0rb
null
null
t1_ec094dw
/r/programming/comments/a4m0rb/game_engine_black_book_doom/ec7aydk/
1547859564
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
blankman0230
t2_e4h1o
Yeah
null
0
1544183887
False
0
eba6g69
t3_a3v0ve
null
null
t1_eba5uyb
/r/programming/comments/a3v0ve/facebook_engineers_discovered_technique_of_adding/eba6g69/
1547300410
5
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
SimpleNovelty
t2_121d0lsg
If you're buying a vehicle fleet I highly doubt you aren't calling a dealership/meeting in person in the first place. I also doubt that a blind person buying a vehicle fleet isn't consulting with someone else considering they don't even drive and likely will need to be fed specs.
null
0
1545336507
False
0
ec7b1fg
t3_a7xwy3
null
null
t1_ec79c22
/r/programming/comments/a7xwy3/theres_already_a_blueprint_for_a_more_accessible/ec7b1fg/
1547859631
10
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
TomSwirly
t2_333rr
I was thinking, "Gosh, there are a lot of idiots on this page today," but you are the _same idiot_ posting elsewhere on this page.
null
0
1544183892
False
0
eba6ga9
t3_a3v0ve
null
null
t1_eb9vt56
/r/programming/comments/a3v0ve/facebook_engineers_discovered_technique_of_adding/eba6ga9/
1547300411
2
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
TikiTDO
t2_3yp3u
So even if you take those statements at face value all you really learn is that a multi-billion dollar insurance business, and a large online news platform that's in the top 200 most visited sites on the internet can recover the cost to get an accessibility specialist within a year. Though pause to consider, not only do they already have the resources to throw around at the problem (in the latter case likely already on staff), they are also positioned very well to take advantage of the benefits; one is public-facing company that stands to make a good chunk of money from every new client they sign, the other is a content platform with profits directly connected to the traffic they pull in. What happens if you are not in such a position? There are many smaller businesses for whom an investment necessary to do such a revision of their system would take many years to pay off. This is especially true of products and services that are not generally targeted at people with disabilities. I have been involved projects that have demanded very strict accessibility standards similar to the insurance company above, but similarly I have been involved in projects that would not even sort-of work for any sort of screen reader. Each of them had totally different requirements and target audiences, and the each required a different style of planning and resource allocation. The idea that all of them would have been better off with the same care and attention is silly.
null
0
1545336634
False
0
ec7b7co
t3_a7xwy3
null
null
t1_ec6urye
/r/programming/comments/a7xwy3/theres_already_a_blueprint_for_a_more_accessible/ec7b7co/
1547859704
5
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
[deleted]
None
[deleted]
null
0
1544183903
False
0
eba6gi5
t3_a3v0ve
null
null
t1_eb9thfk
/r/programming/comments/a3v0ve/facebook_engineers_discovered_technique_of_adding/eba6gi5/
1547300414
0
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
MMPride
t2_2r7kfn4u
slow adjective moving or operating, or designed to do so, only at a low speed; not quick or fast.
null
0
1545336654
False
0
ec7b895
t3_a7xki7
null
null
t1_ec7akej
/r/programming/comments/a7xki7/net_core_whats_coming_in_net_core_30/ec7b895/
1547859715
25
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
TomSwirly
t2_333rr
Here's how everyone other than you uses it: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Too_big_to_fail You really seem like you have some sort of cognitive disorder. Have you thought of spending less time on the Internet? It can't be good for you.
null
0
1544183948
False
0
eba6hjt
t3_a3v0ve
null
null
t1_eb9wxhy
/r/programming/comments/a3v0ve/facebook_engineers_discovered_technique_of_adding/eba6hjt/
1547300427
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
sinedpick
t2_ksuu9
That just means you have too much money.
null
0
1545336678
False
0
ec7b9ce
t3_a7qjey
null
null
t1_ec52sbg
/r/programming/comments/a7qjey/ryanair_hamiltonian_cycles_and_using_graph_theory/ec7b9ce/
1547859728
2
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null