archived
stringclasses
2 values
author
stringlengths
3
20
author_fullname
stringlengths
4
12
body
stringlengths
0
22.5k
comment_type
stringclasses
1 value
controversiality
stringclasses
2 values
created_utc
stringlengths
10
10
edited
stringlengths
4
12
gilded
stringclasses
7 values
id
stringlengths
1
7
link_id
stringlengths
7
10
locked
stringclasses
2 values
name
stringlengths
4
10
parent_id
stringlengths
5
10
permalink
stringlengths
41
91
retrieved_on
stringlengths
10
10
score
stringlengths
1
4
subreddit_id
stringclasses
1 value
subreddit_name_prefixed
stringclasses
1 value
subreddit_type
stringclasses
1 value
total_awards_received
stringclasses
19 values
False
[deleted]
None
[deleted]
null
0
1544054499
False
0
eb6ewaq
t3_a3crqx
null
null
t1_eb58msy
/r/programming/comments/a3crqx/how_i_debugged_a_non_reproducible_bug_with_20k/eb6ewaq/
1547071233
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
UncleMeat11
t2_15oor3
How do we know it was purposeful? There are random divs all over basically every site on the web.
null
0
1545235696
False
0
ec4atr8
t3_a7jj68
null
null
t1_ec3prim
/r/programming/comments/a7jj68/former_microsoft_edge_intern_claims_google/ec4atr8/
1547809023
4
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
AwesomeBantha
t2_impv1
I ***HATE*** it when a GitHub README starts with the 👋 (wave) emoji. I see so much crap like this: > 👋 Welcome to `my-project` 👋 > 1. 📒Documentation > 2. 👌 Examples > 3. 🐞Known Bugs > 4. 😎 Submitting a PR > 5. 😗 Acknowledgements And so on...
null
0
1544054523
False
0
eb6exoq
t3_a3crqx
null
null
t1_eb5b55o
/r/programming/comments/a3crqx/how_i_debugged_a_non_reproducible_bug_with_20k/eb6exoq/
1547071250
27
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
IdiocracyCometh
t2_3s06i
Outside of end-user cloud, Google is a non-factor. That doesn't take anything away from your analysis, but the dichotomy is fascinating.
null
0
1545235742
False
0
ec4avzr
t3_a7k0an
null
null
t1_ec3xsce
/r/programming/comments/a7k0an/did_google_cripple_edges_youtube_performance/ec4avzr/
1547809051
-1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
xenomachina
t2_7mxhc
I don't know PHP, so please correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't that code just appending the values of `$a` and `$b` to the SQL? And if so, wouldn't that be vulnerable to SQL injection?
null
0
1544054614
False
0
eb6f2t5
t3_a2way5
null
null
t1_eb5hu90
/r/programming/comments/a2way5/this_is_why_you_sanitize_user_input_chat_hacked/eb6f2t5/
1547071314
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
Yikings-654points
t2_xjafcf4
You could sell it on eBay , an unupgradable Windows 10.
null
0
1545235746
False
0
ec4aw69
t3_a7hbku
null
null
t1_ec3g9g4
/r/programming/comments/a7hbku/windows_sandbox/ec4aw69/
1547809053
4
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
raam86
t2_4vx87
Most people can’t read code. Only write it
null
0
1544054658
False
0
eb6f5at
t3_a3crqx
null
null
t1_eb55tuo
/r/programming/comments/a3crqx/how_i_debugged_a_non_reproducible_bug_with_20k/eb6f5at/
1547071344
6
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
Eirenarch
t2_46hjd
I didn't have problem when MS crashed the competition. They did it honestly. My biggest problem with Google is their hypocrisy claiming how open and collaborative they are and literally claiming that lawsuits against them are "attack on open source". And this hypocrisy works, devs are ready to suck google's dick en masse.
null
1
1545235790
False
0
ec4ay8r
t3_a7jj68
null
null
t1_ec3sy75
/r/programming/comments/a7jj68/former_microsoft_edge_intern_claims_google/ec4ay8r/
1547809079
-2
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
davidk01
t2_1c5pc
Types are not equivalent to code. This is easy to see with something as simple as the integers. If you have a variable that is an integer then there is no way for the compiler to infer the value of the variable in the general case. This is also true for most programs. Types don't specify complete behavior.
null
0
1544054705
False
0
eb6f7yq
t3_a3cble
null
null
t1_eb6eopq
/r/programming/comments/a3cble/idris_2_typedriven_development_of_idris/eb6f7yq/
1547071378
6
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
deusnefum
t2_3nmpt
Probably because of stuff like SPDY and QUIC and similar non-standard 'enhancements' to protocols.
null
0
1545235827
False
0
ec4b027
t3_a7jj68
null
null
t1_ec3ymx2
/r/programming/comments/a7jj68/former_microsoft_edge_intern_claims_google/ec4b027/
1547809101
6
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
argv_minus_one
t2_4hatx
Also, do you think Xamarin will still be around and maintained in 10 years?
null
0
1544055022
False
0
eb6fpmb
t3_a32foa
null
null
t1_eb51i9o
/r/programming/comments/a32foa/announcing_open_source_of_wpf_windows_forms_and/eb6fpmb/
1547071605
0
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
e-couch
t2_m0qs8
remember, it's google's motto to "Don't be evil". I think it's a bit disingenuous to make your motto the moral high ground meanwhile you do nefarious things with user data. Elon Musk has made statements that question Google's ethics regarding AI and I agree with him.
null
1
1545235840
False
0
ec4b0ot
t3_a7k0an
null
null
t1_ec434lv
/r/programming/comments/a7k0an/did_google_cripple_edges_youtube_performance/ec4b0ot/
1547809109
-1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
Hook3d
t2_5ok4w
Thank you, I thought the implications were fairly obvious too.
null
0
1544055298
False
0
eb6g4xl
t3_a3crqx
null
null
t1_eb6csim
/r/programming/comments/a3crqx/how_i_debugged_a_non_reproducible_bug_with_20k/eb6g4xl/
1547071813
2
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
NoMoreNicksLeft
t2_7mcb
Web standards/protocols have always relied on at least two implementations. Ideally there are many more. That's what makes them "standard". If there's only one implementation, it's just proprietary.
null
0
1545235874
False
0
ec4b2af
t3_a7jj68
null
null
t1_ec3l0m6
/r/programming/comments/a7jj68/former_microsoft_edge_intern_claims_google/ec4b2af/
1547809128
2
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
LvlAndFarm
t2_kuu4c
It's all fine and dandy until daddy Google decides to make malicious use (assuming it's not already) of the shitton of data it has gathered about us.
null
0
1544055328
False
0
eb6g6md
t3_a3htqg
null
null
t3_a3htqg
/r/programming/comments/a3htqg/while_we_blink_we_loose_the_web/eb6g6md/
1547071834
14
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
webauteur
t2_11nmd
Too difficult. Learn Processing instead. Processing was designed to be easy enough for visual artists to learn.
null
0
1545235880
False
0
ec4b2jn
t3_a7f2o1
null
null
t3_a7f2o1
/r/programming/comments/a7f2o1/how_to_start_learning_computer_graphics/ec4b2jn/
1547809132
2
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
dungone
t2_8uzx2
The important quality about leaky abstractions is that the more complicated the abstraction is, the more inevitable it becomes that you'll have to spend time reasoning about the underlying implementation. It doesn't really matter if it's because of a race condition or a performance problem. This is something that engineers seem to get wrong almost all of the time. They will pick a technology based on ease of use, because they think that ease of use and simplicity are roughly the same thing. You'll routinely hear people talking about how popular something is, how involved the community is in solving issues, etc., but you'll rarely hear them saying, "I can actually understand how this works".
null
0
1544055387
1544062214
0
eb6g9u9
t3_a3crqx
null
null
t1_eb5vpoz
/r/programming/comments/a3crqx/how_i_debugged_a_non_reproducible_bug_with_20k/eb6g9u9/
1547071874
23
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
deusnefum
t2_3nmpt
I don't support Google's evil overtures, but at least Google's stuff is a) actually good and b) largely open source. Again, doesn't excuse the shitty old-evil-Microsoft like behavior.
null
0
1545235902
False
0
ec4b3nc
t3_a7jj68
null
null
t1_ec3pr0j
/r/programming/comments/a7jj68/former_microsoft_edge_intern_claims_google/ec4b3nc/
1547809145
-6
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
Hook3d
t2_5ok4w
Sorry, there are what? I think I understand what you're saying just wanna clarify.
null
0
1544055411
False
0
eb6gb6k
t3_a3crqx
null
null
t1_eb6969p
/r/programming/comments/a3crqx/how_i_debugged_a_non_reproducible_bug_with_20k/eb6gb6k/
1547071891
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
hbgoddard
t2_7ea2g
Actually though
null
0
1545235921
False
0
ec4b4lr
t3_a7jj68
null
null
t1_ec3l3eg
/r/programming/comments/a7jj68/former_microsoft_edge_intern_claims_google/ec4b4lr/
1547809157
0
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
sorlafloat
t2_2q1c255k
Store wills in a blockchain to guarantee their integrity. When someone dies you release part of the key, allowing miners to mine, to decrypt the will. Successfully doing this rewards them with a cryptocurrency of which you take a portion, thus incentivising people to mine this, and providing you with free infrastructure and profit.
null
0
1544055425
False
0
eb6gbwr
t3_a3hhb2
null
null
t3_a3hhb2
/r/programming/comments/a3hhb2/i_was_idea_spawning_can_this_be_coded_feedback/eb6gbwr/
1547071900
2
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
marlinspike
t2_1a9m4
And this is less believable and different from a random Intern complaining with zero proof how?
null
0
1545235936
False
0
ec4b5be
t3_a7jj68
null
null
t1_ec41f6x
/r/programming/comments/a7jj68/former_microsoft_edge_intern_claims_google/ec4b5be/
1547809166
7
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
klysm
t2_vhgyt
I doubt the algorithm is searching the space of total programs - it seems like it has a smaller and simpler set of known quantities and functions it can apply to them such that they fill the type holes. My guess is it runs something like a DFS and takes the first one, even if there is more than one possible total function. For instance in matrix transposition, it is definitely not the only total function fitting that type signature - it could totally mix up the vectors - but it is probably the first one the generator comes across.
null
0
1544055580
False
0
eb6gkaz
t3_a3cble
null
null
t1_eb62uur
/r/programming/comments/a3cble/idris_2_typedriven_development_of_idris/eb6gkaz/
1547072004
15
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
jl2352
t2_11g67p
As well as things being tied together, it's partly their cultural process. Windows ships with a bus system. It ships at certain times on the year, and you're either on the bus or you aren't. Crucially you cannot leave early. The Windows Subsystem for Linux has a public bug tracker. Sometimes the developers say they have found the cause of a bug, have a fix, but will have to wait until they can get it into a Windows Update for it to get rolled out. One of these bugs broke `yarn install`. So having to wait for the Windows bus to leave the station can be pretty infuriating.
null
0
1545235951
False
0
ec4b60x
t3_a7jj68
null
null
t1_ec3jdt0
/r/programming/comments/a7jj68/former_microsoft_edge_intern_claims_google/ec4b60x/
1547809203
13
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
ThisIs_MyName
t2_f3gm5
If you want to be nondeterministic, just flip a coin once in a while and adjust your decisions based on the result. Just because the signals in your brain are noisy doesn't mean you have free will.
null
0
1544055685
False
0
eb6gq5f
t3_a3crqx
null
null
t1_eb6csim
/r/programming/comments/a3crqx/how_i_debugged_a_non_reproducible_bug_with_20k/eb6gq5f/
1547072077
5
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
synn89
t2_3jm4t
> Is there? Yes. Outlook, proton, zoho, mail.com, gmx, yandex, inbox.com, etc etc. Or you can host your own and pick 1 of many web interfaces that are out there.
null
0
1545236000
False
0
ec4b8cy
t3_a7jj68
null
null
t1_ec3sx8x
/r/programming/comments/a7jj68/former_microsoft_edge_intern_claims_google/ec4b8cy/
1547809232
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
2Punx2Furious
t2_5z1lm
Not why it matters, source *that* it matters. And, even if there was a random component, do you really think it determines whether we have free will or not? Think about either case. If it's deterministic, do we have or not have free will, just because the brain works precisely according to the laws of physics? Does it mean that we can, or can't control it? No, I think it just means it's predictable, if you know every variable in the universe, and how everything interacts with everything else. And, if it's non-deterministic, do we have or not have free will, just because the brain sometimes doesn't work precisely according to the laws of physics? Does it mean that we can, or can't control it? No, it just means that it's impossible to predict. I don't think determinism has anything to do with free will, it just has to do with how predictable is the universe.
null
1
1544055781
False
0
eb6gvdx
t3_a3crqx
null
null
t1_eb6csim
/r/programming/comments/a3crqx/how_i_debugged_a_non_reproducible_bug_with_20k/eb6gvdx/
1547072141
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
IdiocracyCometh
t2_3s06i
The really fascinating thing is that I can't use Chrome, on my main Win 7 desktop, for any video of any type. It never performs without stutters and hitches and framerate issues. Probably an oddity of my system, but for video, Firefox.latest is my only option. And if Firefox ever manages to get parity with Chrome's dev tools, I'd likely switch 100%.
null
0
1545236044
False
0
ec4bafz
t3_a7k0an
null
null
t1_ec44iih
/r/programming/comments/a7k0an/did_google_cripple_edges_youtube_performance/ec4bafz/
1547809257
11
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
2Punx2Furious
t2_5z1lm
I think it's mostly deterministic, and even if non-deterministic components have some effect, they're minimal, but could be either way.
null
0
1544055924
False
0
eb6h366
t3_a3crqx
null
null
t1_eb6chqi
/r/programming/comments/a3crqx/how_i_debugged_a_non_reproducible_bug_with_20k/eb6h366/
1547072238
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
SandalsMan
t2_evfnl
> when we asked, YouTube turned down our request to remove the hidden empty div and did not elaborate further. No fuckin shit dum ass.
null
0
1545236054
False
0
ec4bay2
t3_a7k0an
null
null
t3_a7k0an
/r/programming/comments/a7k0an/did_google_cripple_edges_youtube_performance/ec4bay2/
1547809264
25
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
mikey_g
t2_463fz
For someone who's never dealt with templates before, can you elaborate on that? Maybe some pretend syntax to demonstrate how you'd like it to look?
null
0
1544056159
False
0
eb6hg07
t3_a3ghju
null
null
t1_eb6bwf7
/r/programming/comments/a3ghju/whats_new_in_c_80/eb6hg07/
1547072426
5
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
algorithmsAI
t2_5vl2z
Pretty sure you can use JSX in Vue
null
0
1545236077
False
0
ec4bc27
t3_a7lho8
null
null
t1_ec43nzd
/r/programming/comments/a7lho8/reasons_why_vuejs_is_getting_more_traction_every/ec4bc27/
1547809277
3
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
mattkerle
t2_3aius
well, more to the point, 99.99% of the time, the bug is in your code, so assuming that the bug is in your code is a good starting point. But going into the framework to see how it's actually written is also a good idea, even if just to understand why what you're doing is wrong.
null
0
1544056239
False
0
eb6hkdb
t3_a3crqx
null
null
t1_eb6599z
/r/programming/comments/a3crqx/how_i_debugged_a_non_reproducible_bug_with_20k/eb6hkdb/
1547072480
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
Fritzed
t2_4idm7
There is an extension for Firefox that spoofs chrome only on Google sites. It makes the experience indistinguishable. I can't easily link it g from my phone, but it's "Google search fixer".
null
0
1545236110
False
0
ec4bdkz
t3_a7jj68
null
null
t1_ec3ymx2
/r/programming/comments/a7jj68/former_microsoft_edge_intern_claims_google/ec4bdkz/
1547809296
39
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
FvckYourSafeSpace
t2_129fj0
Bugzilla wasn’t packaged for a long while IIRC. It’s not really like that anymore unless you have a specific need for custom compilation.
null
0
1544056296
False
0
eb6hngv
t3_a3dobm
null
null
t1_eb6cgh6
/r/programming/comments/a3dobm/at_22_years_old_postgres_might_just_be_the_most/eb6hngv/
1547072518
10
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
webbannana
t2_ep5qk
I can see what he means. Ever noticed that the YouTube full-screen button's clickable region doesn't extend to the Edge of the display on Firefox? I created [a trivial fix for this myself](https://www.reddit.com/r/firefox/comments/6tvocb/youtube_fullscreen_button_clickable_area/). Even if it's a bug in Firefox that's causing this behavior, it really proves they don't care about supporting any browser other than Chrome.
null
0
1545236179
False
0
ec4bgwr
t3_a7jj68
null
null
t3_a7jj68
/r/programming/comments/a7jj68/former_microsoft_edge_intern_claims_google/ec4bgwr/
1547809337
6
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
__j_random_hacker
t2_4rnnt
I've often thought that having logic directly in the database is actually the *ideal* way to do most business logic (in every respect except for the ability to switch databases easily -- but optimising for that case is often premature). But the development environment (tooling, debugging, source control integration) is so godawful compared to what's available outside -- you're more or less locked in to T-SQL/plpgsql, which no one in their right mind would want to program a large system in, and printf-style debugging. This seems like an area that is ripe for someone to come in and offer a dramatically better experience (or perhaps someone already has and I just haven't been looking hard enough?)
null
0
1544056351
False
0
eb6hqea
t3_a3dobm
null
null
t1_eb65bg7
/r/programming/comments/a3dobm/at_22_years_old_postgres_might_just_be_the_most/eb6hqea/
1547072554
11
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
policjant
t2_1424qkjz
It used to be their motto
null
0
1545236248
False
0
ec4bkb0
t3_a7k0an
null
null
t1_ec4b0ot
/r/programming/comments/a7k0an/did_google_cripple_edges_youtube_performance/ec4bkb0/
1547809379
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
FvckYourSafeSpace
t2_129fj0
Hyperbole. Some people even use actual servers still. I just went to the data centre today.
null
0
1544056353
False
0
eb6hqhw
t3_a3dobm
null
null
t1_eb684g0
/r/programming/comments/a3dobm/at_22_years_old_postgres_might_just_be_the_most/eb6hqhw/
1547072556
9
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
anatoly722
t2_24ckremk
Didn't notice any difference when using gmail in chrome or firefox. Using firefox as the default as it takes less resources.
null
0
1545236260
False
0
ec4bkvo
t3_a7jj68
null
null
t1_ec3ymx2
/r/programming/comments/a7jj68/former_microsoft_edge_intern_claims_google/ec4bkvo/
1547809386
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
[deleted]
None
[deleted]
null
0
1544056376
False
0
eb6hrsj
t3_a3dobm
null
null
t1_eb5lqbl
/r/programming/comments/a3dobm/at_22_years_old_postgres_might_just_be_the_most/eb6hrsj/
1547072572
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
SilasX
t2_4o64v
Yes, in *general*. But if YouTube is such a common issue, they can, *at worst*, implement a narrow workaround, and most likely do have a more general solution for allowing easy restart when the DOM tree bottoms out on a video node.
null
0
1545236300
False
0
ec4bmqe
t3_a7jj68
null
null
t1_ec4aswk
/r/programming/comments/a7jj68/former_microsoft_edge_intern_claims_google/ec4bmqe/
1547809409
-3
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
Hook3d
t2_5ok4w
> Just because the signals in your brain are noisy doesn't mean you have free will. I think /u/nowonmai agrees with you.
null
0
1544056439
False
0
eb6hvc4
t3_a3crqx
null
null
t1_eb6gq5f
/r/programming/comments/a3crqx/how_i_debugged_a_non_reproducible_bug_with_20k/eb6hvc4/
1547072616
2
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
[deleted]
None
Just to add some context, 'that guy' is Patrick Walton, and he's an engineer at Mozilla. He works on Servo and probably other bits of Firefox, too. So his thoughts on the topic are probably worth considering. More info: https://twitter.com/pcwalton https://github.com/pcwalton https://www.linkedin.com/in/patrick-walton-30a10b16/ I'm typically not a big fan of appeals to authority, but in this case I think that who the commenter is *does* add some credibility to what he's writing because it's directly related to what he works on every day.
null
0
1545236303
1545240305
0
ec4bmw4
t3_a7jj68
null
null
t1_ec48yfx
/r/programming/comments/a7jj68/former_microsoft_edge_intern_claims_google/ec4bmw4/
1547809411
110
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
shevegen
t2_atqp
> Sources claim that Microsoft is abandoning EdgeHTML and building a > Blink/Chromium based browser. Well - MS has not denied it, so I think it is true. They will probably announce it at some later time. > This might be a good business decision for Microsoft but it is a > disastrous advancement for the Web. I don't think it is. MS had ... less than 5% or so with Edge? And IE had ... a bit more? Or a bit less? Combined perhaps ... 9%? https://www.w3schools.com/browsers/default.asp The above link is not representative, granted, due to tech savvy folks - but the trend is a real one. Google bulldozers over everyone and everything. Then there is AMP, to addict everyone into the biggest walled ghetto ever built - the Google ghetto. Even China becomes part of it since Google agreed to spy on people there too. Greed and Evil knows no boundaries for Google. > In this short post, I will make a case for why we’re losing the > Web and how in a Blink, all we love about our Web will be > owned and controlled by a single entity. Right now this is true. But I think in the long run it will not be. Why? Because people get seriously f*cking tired of not only Google but the whole www being stolen. You can see it with the W3C becoming a lobby group for DRM. You think these clowns "represent" average joe anymore? > This is easy to understand as the Web in 2018 is far more > complex than it was in the early noughties. Most of that complexity is actually unnecessary. Who needs these "upgrades" from the W3C? A lot of this is due to JavaScript being such a HORRIBLE joke of a language. WebAssembly will hopefully kill JS - but it won't. And as you think JS may die, Google adds adDart to generate more revenue and getting foolish people to use it too. :) > It is very costly to develop and maintain a Web engine > and few companies have the necessary talent and cash to do it. This is all true but again - we don't HAVE to partake in this arms race. Most of the new "functionality" is COMPLETELY unnecessary. > Besides them you only had Microsoft building EdgeHTML and > Mozilla building Gecko. Now, if Microsoft adopt Chromium as > a base, there will only be Mozilla left building on a different base > and this is terrible for the Web. Yes it is bad. Solution: - Stop feeding Google. It will only become greedier. Find alternatives to Google wherever you can. Youtube? Use proxies. And alternative hosts (actually it would be great to have a decentralized web including videos). > This was possible because of the astounding work of multiple > stakeholders that range from the W3C to the browser makers > to many of the large web properties. The W3C has lost all credibility. And it actually led (!) to this monopoly that we have right now. Stop feeding the clowns at W3C too. And if you work at the W3C - shame on you for being such a DRM-clown killing diversity on the www. > Everyone working “kind of together” to make sure the Web > works the same and that we have standards. That is a lie. AMP is a good example but W3C accepting bribes aka membership fee is another one. I hate to join RMS as a preacher but when you look at it, just objectively, then Google and co are simply stealing from you. They steal your data. And use the money to build more walled ghettos. Not just Google alone. Microsoft assimilating GitHub; Facebook. And they interconnect that with data from reallife, patient data. Hence why Facebook is more aptly called CIAbook. > Mozilla is making lots of incredible progress with its Firefox > Quantum project that is picking parts of Servo and reworking > them into Firefox, stuff such as the first parallel layout engine > happened there for example. How much progress will stop > by choosing a single road forward. No, that is an illusion. I thought so too perhaps 2 years ago. Took me some time to understand the illusion. Revelation was that the Mozilla clowns became arrogant and stupid. How? Simple. They alienated users away from Firefox. On top of that they had to create an inferior language (Rust) that is not good for ANYTHING while they suck on Google's teets for more money. Then they also use google analytics and telemetry-spy to spy on you and ... nah, just nah. Constantly losing market share. They gave up the fight a long time ago. If you want to make a bet on Mozilla then be prepared to lose it. They already threw in the towel due to sheer incompetence, so don't build on them. If you want to build an alternative then you need to stop using Google and other walled ghetto builders. Support smaller and independent browsers. KEEP THE COMPLEXITY DOWN TOO. Complexity only helps the big greedy companies. There is absolutely no reason why browsers need be so complex. Sure, JavaScript, being the joke it is, is a massive reason why things became so idiotic. Well - find alternatives to JavaScript too. Also don't make CSS more complex. And there is no need to add more useless tags to HTML - what for, anyway? We don't need that. > Even though Opera, Beaker and Brave are all doing very > good work, it is still Chrome engine behind them and that > limits the amount of stuff they can build and innovate. Yes. That was strange. Opera switched to adchromium. Past that point there was no real point using it. Same with vivaldi. > We already lost the mobile world for a duopoly of Apple and > Google That is true too. > now we’re losing the desktop most used application, the Web > Browser, to a monopoly from Google again, how much control > do you want that company to have over the future of the Web? That is also true. Right now it looks bad. Nothing is able to stop Evil aka Google. > Google is controlling too much of the Web stack, it controls the > engine used by most users thus making what we used to call > User Agents into Google Agents, it also controls the most popular > search engine, the most popular email provider, and the most > popular mobile platform, all this is profiling you or biasing your > experience in some direction that profits them. Yes, we all know that. My first hope, although I won't bet on it, is that Google will be split up. It is unsustainable to allow it to operate like that. Oddly enough, local politicians focus more on Facebook. Now CIAbook is annoying to no ends but Google is in a way different, more dangerous league of pure Evil. > Companies used to be broken by the governments way > before this amount of control happened. It's clear that the US government is bribed as-is so they won't do anything. Google pays its lobbyists well. It is more likely that the EU will act. The fines are evidently not working; Google continues to abuse its monopoly position. So solution B is to split it up. Google of course can withdraw from the EU market, which would be AWESOME. Google CEOs can be put in jail via warrant of arrest for continuing its malpractice mafia deeds. In many ways Google became like Micorosft of the 1990s but much worse (and more powerful). > How we’ll fight for privacy, decentralization, safety, once > the main engine is an engine made by an advertising company? Precisely. We can't. People could stop using Google stuff but most people are too stupid - plus there are indeed not that many alternatives now. Mozilla is no alternative. > What happens to Web Standards when lazy web developers > decide that supporting chrome is enough, then, the standards > become whatever chrome implemented. Yes, these clowns also help Google for free. Well we can not do much against these clowns either but you can stop visiting their websites. Or, even better - USE DIFFERENT BROWSERS. Even though there isn't much of a choice ...... :\ :/ > Calls to action: > Try the new Firefox at https://firefox.com No, that will not work. It's better than adChromium but ... nope. Mozilla is dysfunct already. > Contribute to Servo No, that is pointless. Rust should have never existed to begin with. Mozilla is further trying to fragment people here. C++ is fine; adChromium is written mostly in C++ too. So why does Google succeed and Mozilla fail? I have no idea - ask the "clever" people who work hard at Mozilla getting rid of users. I've been using firefox in the past. Technically I am still using firefox, aka palemoon - and it's a step back in some ways, usability and such. But I consider it as a stepping stone that is more realistic than using firefox (or even worse, using adChromium and helping Google further monopolize on the web). On that note - prevent the AMP cancer.
null
0
1544056570
False
0
eb6i2i4
t3_a3htqg
null
null
t3_a3htqg
/r/programming/comments/a3htqg/while_we_blink_we_loose_the_web/eb6i2i4/
1547072704
-24
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
deusnefum
t2_3nmpt
Native code and toolkits?
null
0
1545236393
False
0
ec4br3b
t3_a7jj68
null
null
t1_ec46hx7
/r/programming/comments/a7jj68/former_microsoft_edge_intern_claims_google/ec4br3b/
1547809463
7
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
renrutal
t2_6nt9z
Just yesterday I was thinking that the existence of true non-deterministic behavior in programs would be akin to living in the second circle of hell: restlessness.
null
0
1544056594
False
0
eb6i3sp
t3_a3crqx
null
null
t1_eb5hrxn
/r/programming/comments/a3crqx/how_i_debugged_a_non_reproducible_bug_with_20k/eb6i3sp/
1547072720
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
dumbdingus
t2_i2uesbc
You're getting downvotes for speaking the truth. Only backup the data you want to keep.
null
0
1545236424
False
0
ec4bso2
t3_a7jj68
null
null
t1_ec469zd
/r/programming/comments/a7jj68/former_microsoft_edge_intern_claims_google/ec4bso2/
1547809482
6
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
shevegen
t2_atqp
Of course it already does. Your data is their money. Ads are only the more obvious way but you can gain more money via additional means on top of that as long as you have the user profiles. Although I have no evidence, I have a slight suspicion that this was a similar reason why MS assimilated GitHub. Not nearly as evident as ads for Google here, but still noteworthy.
null
0
1544056642
False
0
eb6i6ec
t3_a3htqg
null
null
t1_eb6g6md
/r/programming/comments/a3htqg/while_we_blink_we_loose_the_web/eb6i6ec/
1547072752
9
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
deusnefum
t2_3nmpt
The problem was IE exposed basically the entire OS to the web. Had they got isolation / sandboxing done right, they'd have maintained their stranglehold on the web even longer, I'd wager.
null
0
1545236458
False
0
ec4bua1
t3_a7jj68
null
null
t1_ec44wqw
/r/programming/comments/a7jj68/former_microsoft_edge_intern_claims_google/ec4bua1/
1547809502
20
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
nilamo
t2_8l947
Because when I'm a startup, the first thing I want to do is spend $15k for SQL server lol. Postgres is better in features and speed, while running on machines that cost less. Simple choice is simple.
null
0
1544056807
False
0
eb6ife9
t3_a3dobm
null
null
t1_eb67afp
/r/programming/comments/a3dobm/at_22_years_old_postgres_might_just_be_the_most/eb6ife9/
1547072863
17
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
Private_HughMan
t2_1ks5kl4m
I get that, but Google isn't hindering old Edge. They're hindering current Edge, Firefox, and Safari.
null
1
1545236499
False
0
ec4bw9a
t3_a7k0an
null
null
t1_ec49q72
/r/programming/comments/a7k0an/did_google_cripple_edges_youtube_performance/ec4bw9a/
1547809526
-1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
wigglysam
t2_2kt0raoe
Hey everyone! I'm 15 years old, and live in the United States. I am attempting to make a discord community of beginner programmers such as myself. I want to go through the learning process with other people, beginners to advanced, and receive and give help along the way. I believe it will be a ton of fun and an overall good time. If anyone is interested in joining me then come along, I can't wait to meet you all and learn some programming! ​
null
0
1544056924
False
0
eb6ilfy
t3_a3imz9
null
null
t3_a3imz9
/r/programming/comments/a3imz9/15_year_old_looking_for_beginner_programming/eb6ilfy/
1547072938
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
bjs2
t2_8bqzc
But don’t worry, Google is committed to “not being evil”.
null
0
1545236508
False
0
ec4bwqn
t3_a7jj68
null
null
t1_ec40jbx
/r/programming/comments/a7jj68/former_microsoft_edge_intern_claims_google/ec4bwqn/
1547809532
22
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
Hook3d
t2_5ok4w
Right but if you clone a human brain and give both the exact same external stimuli -- equivalent to giving identical neural networks identical inputs to the input layer -- is there any reason to think they'll have measurably different brainwave activity?
null
0
1544056938
False
0
eb6im8h
t3_a3crqx
null
null
t1_eb65366
/r/programming/comments/a3crqx/how_i_debugged_a_non_reproducible_bug_with_20k/eb6im8h/
1547072948
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
kolobs_butthole
t2_ppqfeh5
Not the Google engineer, but a dev who used the same trick to work around some edge "features" unrelated to rendering performance.
null
0
1545236512
False
0
ec4bwwn
t3_a7jj68
null
null
t1_ec49qxh
/r/programming/comments/a7jj68/former_microsoft_edge_intern_claims_google/ec4bwwn/
1547809534
63
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
aazav
t2_4rki0
> our team release a new version releases* Our team is an it. It releases. That's how it works in English.
null
0
1544056973
False
0
eb6io1l
t3_a3crqx
null
null
t3_a3crqx
/r/programming/comments/a3crqx/how_i_debugged_a_non_reproducible_bug_with_20k/eb6io1l/
1547072971
0
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
Private_HughMan
t2_1ks5kl4m
That's fair, but it doesn't explain why Google makes their services run much better on their browser and much worse on others. I need an extension on Firefox to restore the old YouTube just so I get snappy performance cuz the new layout chugs so much.
null
0
1545236577
False
0
ec4c04v
t3_a7k0an
null
null
t1_ec4a47y
/r/programming/comments/a7k0an/did_google_cripple_edges_youtube_performance/ec4c04v/
1547809574
4
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
TrixieMisa
t2_f2709
\*lose
null
0
1544056976
False
0
eb6io66
t3_a3htqg
null
null
t3_a3htqg
/r/programming/comments/a3htqg/while_we_blink_we_loose_the_web/eb6io66/
1547073002
69
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
[deleted]
None
And Martin is creating the story in his books - it's not like he is writing a history book. What a bizarre comparison.
null
0
1545236609
False
0
ec4c1oq
t3_a7m6jc
null
null
t1_ec495c3
/r/programming/comments/a7m6jc/a_profile_on_donald_knuth/ec4c1oq/
1547809593
25
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
cb9022
t2_t2uz2su
Good thing I noticed it was you before I wasted five whole minutes reading your wall of text.
null
0
1544057029
False
0
eb6iquj
t3_a3htqg
null
null
t1_eb6i2i4
/r/programming/comments/a3htqg/while_we_blink_we_loose_the_web/eb6iquj/
1547073034
28
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
SilasX
t2_4o64v
And if it's a common enough pattern, then browser renderers should expect it and adapt for it.
null
0
1545236692
False
0
ec4c5ug
t3_a7k0an
null
null
t1_ec3stsf
/r/programming/comments/a7k0an/did_google_cripple_edges_youtube_performance/ec4c5ug/
1547809644
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
Hook3d
t2_5ok4w
Cosmic rays have been shown to flip bits on RAM, but we still consider computers deterministic.
null
0
1544057118
False
0
eb6iviz
t3_a3crqx
null
null
t1_eb5wzm8
/r/programming/comments/a3crqx/how_i_debugged_a_non_reproducible_bug_with_20k/eb6iviz/
1547073093
3
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
nschubach
t2_6c5l8
I'm so hip man, look at my Reeboks!
null
0
1545236717
False
0
ec4c72f
t3_a7jj68
null
null
t1_ec480nx
/r/programming/comments/a7jj68/former_microsoft_edge_intern_claims_google/ec4c72f/
1547809659
-3
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
mqudsi
t2_431fu
I mean, if you’re still using EF6 then it’s automatically the wrong way. EF Core is here to stay.
null
0
1544057129
False
0
eb6iw5m
t3_a3flnv
null
null
t3_a3flnv
/r/programming/comments/a3flnv/managing_dbcontext_the_right_way_with_entity/eb6iw5m/
1547073100
0
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
BoxMonster44
t2_4zr8u
I'll never be over Inbox. It was so good. F
null
0
1545236719
False
0
ec4c751
t3_a7jj68
null
null
t1_ec491it
/r/programming/comments/a7jj68/former_microsoft_edge_intern_claims_google/ec4c751/
1547809660
23
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
Doomaa
t2_145eiu
Ok...so I'm not crazy. It was an unpackaged app that was a PIA to install. I assumed all linux apps were like this. Are modern linux apps just a click of an .exe nowadays just like windows?
null
0
1544057305
False
0
eb6j5dx
t3_a3dobm
null
null
t1_eb6hngv
/r/programming/comments/a3dobm/at_22_years_old_postgres_might_just_be_the_most/eb6j5dx/
1547073214
3
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
senj
t2_3wc5u
> I mean... google claims they are making $1 billion per quarter in cloud services revenue. Is that counting all of their GCP hosting products as well, or just the office suite?
null
0
1545236725
False
0
ec4c7g3
t3_a7k0an
null
null
t1_ec41vr2
/r/programming/comments/a7k0an/did_google_cripple_edges_youtube_performance/ec4c7g3/
1547809664
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
grauenwolf
t2_570j
EF Core is already dead. EF Core 2.x, with its new provider model is "here to stay". At least until they release EF Core 3.0 and break everything again.
null
0
1544057317
False
0
eb6j5zx
t3_a3flnv
null
null
t1_eb6iw5m
/r/programming/comments/a3flnv/managing_dbcontext_the_right_way_with_entity/eb6j5zx/
1547073222
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
madsonm
t2_387to
I had a hard time after "Former Microsoft Edge Intern". Such an authority on a rival company's inner workings.. \s
null
0
1545236738
False
0
ec4c83l
t3_a7jj68
null
null
t1_ec3zugw
/r/programming/comments/a7jj68/former_microsoft_edge_intern_claims_google/ec4c83l/
1547809673
11
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
oridb
t2_90rkq
As someone who's spent enough time debugging issues where the caller didn't quite understand the limitations: Subtle corruption in relatively rare cases is a big problem. Failures need to be loud and in your face, or you'll spend weeks tracking down issues.
null
0
1544057336
False
0
eb6j70w
t3_a3dobm
null
null
t1_eb5tqft
/r/programming/comments/a3dobm/at_22_years_old_postgres_might_just_be_the_most/eb6j70w/
1547073235
6
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
rqebmm
t2_f0cvn
Plus the explanation is almost certainly "Google made changes that didn't play nice with Edge because they don't care about playing nice with Edge" and Edge devs see that as "Google is sabotaging our product!!!"
null
0
1545236784
False
0
ec4cabr
t3_a7jj68
null
null
t1_ec46mw8
/r/programming/comments/a7jj68/former_microsoft_edge_intern_claims_google/ec4cabr/
1547809700
39
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
mqudsi
t2_431fu
Touché
null
0
1544057348
False
0
eb6j7na
t3_a3flnv
null
null
t1_eb6j5zx
/r/programming/comments/a3flnv/managing_dbcontext_the_right_way_with_entity/eb6j7na/
1547073243
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
Eirenarch
t2_46hjd
I don't think Google are after Edge in particular, they are against every competing browser. They only care about the performance on Chrome. Firefox is often hit hard too.
null
0
1545236814
False
0
ec4cbr9
t3_a7k0an
null
null
t1_ec4bw9a
/r/programming/comments/a7k0an/did_google_cripple_edges_youtube_performance/ec4cbr9/
1547809718
0
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
atomic_cheese
t2_4qvau
Oracle's more of a rent extraction engine than a database, to be fair.
null
0
1544057609
False
0
eb6jl70
t3_a3dobm
null
null
t1_eb635qa
/r/programming/comments/a3dobm/at_22_years_old_postgres_might_just_be_the_most/eb6jl70/
1547073410
64
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
nschubach
t2_6c5l8
BTW, have you signed up for OneDrive? You really should! ^^^/s
null
0
1545236816
False
0
ec4cbtg
t3_a7jj68
null
null
t1_ec43lrz
/r/programming/comments/a7jj68/former_microsoft_edge_intern_claims_google/ec4cbtg/
1547809719
4
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
seanwilson
t2_4brlv
As an example, a type could be a "function that takes a list and gives back a sorted implementation of that list" and a program for that type could be quicksort, bubble sort, merge sort etc. I've not kept up with the state of the art but you can imagine given the search space and the ingenuity behind complex algorithms, automatically finding a program that matches satisfies the type isn't easy. It's very similar to getting a computer to find a mathematical proof to any maths statement. Filling in the gaps is much more practical though.
null
0
1544057900
False
0
eb6k0cf
t3_a3cble
null
null
t1_eb6eopq
/r/programming/comments/a3cble/idris_2_typedriven_development_of_idris/eb6k0cf/
1547073627
6
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
jlchauncey
t2_31pib
I've seen this done for ie6/7 users to get them to move off old versions
null
0
1545236820
False
0
ec4cc0y
t3_a7jj68
null
null
t1_ec3suk9
/r/programming/comments/a7jj68/former_microsoft_edge_intern_claims_google/ec4cc0y/
1547809721
2
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
lordbharal
t2_hhsgs
i guess the problem with that is two fold (edit and then i added an extra point because i cannot count) 1. a lot of good developers - probably most - don't contribute to github. this is because good developers will have jobs, and will be working on those jobs. not all, mind, but most. 2. i read somewhere that a titanic chunk of github is copied - [https://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/11/21/github\_duplicate\_code/](https://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/11/21/github_duplicate_code/) \- so it's not terribly useful as a medium of measurement of good developers. 3. you're right about the analysis, although i'm not planning on using anything other than file imports and class / method names. i think you can get a handle on what code does with just that? But you raise some fresh ideas. Its frustrating how broken tech recruitment is (i'm not even talking about the interview process!) any other ideas on measurable data for finding developers?
null
0
1544057971
False
0
eb6k40v
t3_a3ev38
null
null
t1_eb5rnpg
/r/programming/comments/a3ev38/thoughts_on_tech_recruitment_id_love_feedback_on/eb6k40v/
1547073672
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
CoreParad0x
t2_11t5pr
If I understand how this works, then there would still be traces on the disk. From what I can tell it's just a vm, so firefox/chrome/whatever else would still save files. The disk probably just gets soft deleted (as opposed to securely erasing the space on disk). So someone using file recovery could find them.
null
0
1545236850
False
0
ec4cdjq
t3_a7hbku
null
null
t1_ec3e8k3
/r/programming/comments/a7hbku/windows_sandbox/ec4cdjq/
1547809740
2
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
[deleted]
None
[deleted]
null
0
1544058085
False
0
eb6k9vx
t3_a3crqx
null
null
t1_eb68v21
/r/programming/comments/a3crqx/how_i_debugged_a_non_reproducible_bug_with_20k/eb6k9vx/
1547073747
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
eldred2
t2_4f3km
Anyone else remember, "The OS isn't done if WordPerfect still runs?"
null
0
1545236920
False
0
ec4cgyx
t3_a7jj68
null
null
t3_a7jj68
/r/programming/comments/a7jj68/former_microsoft_edge_intern_claims_google/ec4cgyx/
1547809812
3
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
Ameisen
t2_5qad2
~~Rust~~ C++
null
0
1544058142
False
0
eb6kcst
t3_a3crqx
null
null
t1_eb59gih
/r/programming/comments/a3crqx/how_i_debugged_a_non_reproducible_bug_with_20k/eb6kcst/
1547073782
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
david-song
t2_lr7xph3
Seems like a lot more effort than `CTRL+SHIFT+P`
null
0
1545236931
False
0
ec4chit
t3_a7hbku
null
null
t1_ec3nul3
/r/programming/comments/a7hbku/windows_sandbox/ec4chit/
1547809819
6
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
Maelstrome26
t2_5dt9q
It's to do with web programming, there's probably a better sub for it, admittedly.
null
0
1544058269
False
0
eb6kixy
t3_a3bupj
null
null
t1_eb65viu
/r/programming/comments/a3bupj/evernote_why_do_you_want_to_break_password/eb6kixy/
1547073858
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
sasashimi
t2_qyedm
for me it was obvious they were up to something when Firefox stopped being able to use hangouts calls via Gmail.. up until that point I had only used chrome for development :/
null
0
1545236978
False
0
ec4cjpg
t3_a7jj68
null
null
t1_ec42c76
/r/programming/comments/a7jj68/former_microsoft_edge_intern_claims_google/ec4cjpg/
1547809846
63
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
phalp
t2_ajc92
Well, inference is a search problem... sometimes you just can't find your solution. And some type systems may not have ways to represent a program's behavior completely. But I'm saying, even if everything is peachy like in his first examples, and the computer finds exactly the program you wanted--did you do any less work? Like, by my count that append function's definition is one character shorter than its type.
null
0
1544058337
False
0
eb6kmc4
t3_a3cble
null
null
t1_eb6f7yq
/r/programming/comments/a3cble/idris_2_typedriven_development_of_idris/eb6kmc4/
1547073900
3
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
RagingAnemone
t2_3l83h
Disk space really isn’t the issue with electron.
null
0
1545237003
False
0
ec4ckx3
t3_a7jj68
null
null
t1_ec44wqw
/r/programming/comments/a7jj68/former_microsoft_edge_intern_claims_google/ec4ckx3/
1547809861
2
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
maccam94
t2_3qfgg
I think you misread the context here. I was talking about how to design your tests, not how to debug a problem.
null
0
1544058593
False
0
eb6kz7m
t3_a3crqx
null
null
t1_eb6hkdb
/r/programming/comments/a3crqx/how_i_debugged_a_non_reproducible_bug_with_20k/eb6kz7m/
1547074060
2
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
DiggV4Sucks
t2_4a8xe
How does this guy know I was watching *Full House* reruns?
null
0
1545237070
False
0
ec4co8d
t3_a7jj68
null
null
t1_ec49qxh
/r/programming/comments/a7jj68/former_microsoft_edge_intern_claims_google/ec4co8d/
1547809902
8
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
bradygilg
t2_3z6b8
Yeah it is, actually the first paragraph of the article the guy linked addresses that. >De Broglie–Bohm theory was widely deemed unacceptable by mainstream theorists, mostly because of its explicit non-locality. Bell's theorem (1964) was inspired by Bell's discovery of the work of David Bohm and his subsequent wondering whether the obvious nonlocality of the theory could be eliminated.
null
0
1544058597
False
0
eb6kzgn
t3_a3crqx
null
null
t1_eb6aayd
/r/programming/comments/a3crqx/how_i_debugged_a_non_reproducible_bug_with_20k/eb6kzgn/
1547074064
5
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
Superpickle18
t2_kzk9p
No, but RAM sure is.
null
0
1545237075
False
0
ec4coht
t3_a7jj68
null
null
t1_ec4ckx3
/r/programming/comments/a7jj68/former_microsoft_edge_intern_claims_google/ec4coht/
1547809905
14
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
phalp
t2_ajc92
So you're saying we need a way to specify the complexity of the intended algorithm via types? ;) But yes, I'd question the win of writing the types then still writing any tricky parts of the code. Beyond the usual feeling that the types constitute an argument that the program is correct.
null
0
1544058634
False
0
eb6l198
t3_a3cble
null
null
t1_eb6k0cf
/r/programming/comments/a3cble/idris_2_typedriven_development_of_idris/eb6l198/
1547074085
3
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
dakotahawkins
t2_31rbs
Where am I supposed to get my hay now?
null
0
1545237148
False
0
ec4cs29
t3_a7jj68
null
null
t1_ec463wq
/r/programming/comments/a7jj68/former_microsoft_edge_intern_claims_google/ec4cs29/
1547809948
1
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
seanwilson
t2_4brlv
> Beyond the usual feeling that the types constitute an argument that the program is correct. I'm not sure what you mean. Type checking is proving the program is correct with regards to the properties described in the typing. When you can specify strong properties like "this function is a sorting algorithm" it's incredibly valuable and is as close as you're going to get to bug free programs.
null
0
1544058903
False
0
eb6lemr
t3_a3cble
null
null
t1_eb6l198
/r/programming/comments/a3cble/idris_2_typedriven_development_of_idris/eb6lemr/
1547074278
10
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
Dgc2002
t2_52v7g
Posted with the same exact URL [here](https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/a7m6jc/a_profile_on_donald_knuth/) 2 hours before this post.
null
0
1545237151
False
0
ec4cs8a
t3_a7nahb
null
null
t3_a7nahb
/r/programming/comments/a7nahb/the_yoda_of_silicon_valley/ec4cs8a/
1547809950
2
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
2Punx2Furious
t2_5z1lm
What is it? True that there is no hidden variable? By the way, I've read a bit more on it, and it says that it just excludes it locally, but it could still exist non-locally, which makes sense.
null
0
1544058914
False
0
eb6lf7e
t3_a3crqx
null
null
t1_eb6kzgn
/r/programming/comments/a3crqx/how_i_debugged_a_non_reproducible_bug_with_20k/eb6lf7e/
1547074285
3
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
venuswasaflytrap
t2_3g78x
They can't. Not really. You ever shared a rented house with people? Or you at least have seen house-shares? You know how in pretty much every house share, there will be things like, maybe you put the trash in the wrong dumpster, because the dumpster you're supposed to use is too far away. Or you're not supposed to have late parties, because people are trying to sleep, but occasionally you're a little loud until 12 or 1, which isn't too bad you think. And besides, the neighbours have a dog that they don't clean up after anyway, so you don't really feel so inclined to do something nice for them. And maybe there is a guy in your flat that is a bit lazy, so he leaves dishes out or something, and if you're honest with yourself, it's likely that he's antagonising some of the neighbours unfairly. And then you damaged the wall by putting a picture up, even though you weren't supposed to, but you don't bother telling the landlord, because the deposit was pretty expensive and you don't wanna pay that much. Anyway, even if you haven't been in these situations, I'm sure they sound familiar. Rich powerful companies and CEOs and what not aren't assholes. *Everyone* is an asshole. Or rather there are lots of assholes littered at every level of success and power. The difference is, when you and your neighbours are a little rude to each other, and don't clean up dog shit, or don't recognise that it was only one time and actually it was someone else's dog that shit the last time - the consequences of the disagreement are only felt between you and your neighbours, or you and your landlord, or whoever is involved. When you're very powerful, either because you're influencing the market, or you have lots of money or whatever, these little shitty things affect *everybody*. Arguably the more power you have the less of an asshole you have to be. But no one think they're powerful or an asshole, even though we all are really. So you can't just stop it, any more than you can make every person in every house share do all their dishes
null
0
1545237167
False
0
ec4ct1a
t3_a7jj68
null
null
t1_ec4acys
/r/programming/comments/a7jj68/former_microsoft_edge_intern_claims_google/ec4ct1a/
1547809961
26
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
lostbeyondbelief
t2_a8c5w
In my experience, reproducing "randomly" occurring thread safety issues almost always requires identifying the exact code conditions and manually manipulating the threads to get the timing right.
null
0
1544059187
False
0
eb6ls7d
t3_a3crqx
null
null
t1_eb5krvw
/r/programming/comments/a3crqx/how_i_debugged_a_non_reproducible_bug_with_20k/eb6ls7d/
1547074446
6
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null
False
jl2352
t2_11g67p
Which is what they ended up doing.
null
0
1545237227
False
0
ec4cvyz
t3_a7jj68
null
null
t1_ec4bmqe
/r/programming/comments/a7jj68/former_microsoft_edge_intern_claims_google/ec4cvyz/
1547809997
9
t5_2fwo
r/programming
public
null