Dataset Preview
Duplicate
The full dataset viewer is not available (click to read why). Only showing a preview of the rows.
The dataset generation failed because of a cast error
Error code:   DatasetGenerationCastError
Exception:    DatasetGenerationCastError
Message:      An error occurred while generating the dataset

All the data files must have the same columns, but at some point there are 12 new columns ({'significant', 'kind', 'p_perm', 'z', 'rsa', 'control', 'ceiling', 'frac_of_ceiling', 'p_holm', 'variant', 'null_mean', 'null_sd'}) and 6 missing columns ({'ceiling_lower', 'n_subjects_rdm', 'ceiling_lower_sem', 'ceiling_upper', 'ceiling_n', 'file'}).

This happened while the csv dataset builder was generating data using

hf://datasets/BrainAlign/brain-lm-alignment-ds006239/control/control_by_cell.csv (at revision c4b9198475ef76716a026459b15f74acca6ae155), ['hf://datasets/BrainAlign/brain-lm-alignment-ds006239@c4b9198475ef76716a026459b15f74acca6ae155/ceilings_ds006239.csv', 'hf://datasets/BrainAlign/brain-lm-alignment-ds006239@c4b9198475ef76716a026459b15f74acca6ae155/control/control_by_cell.csv', 'hf://datasets/BrainAlign/brain-lm-alignment-ds006239@c4b9198475ef76716a026459b15f74acca6ae155/control/control_summary.csv', 'hf://datasets/BrainAlign/brain-lm-alignment-ds006239@c4b9198475ef76716a026459b15f74acca6ae155/control/rdm_dimensionality.csv']

Please either edit the data files to have matching columns, or separate them into different configurations (see docs at https://hf.co/docs/hub/datasets-manual-configuration#multiple-configurations)
Traceback:    Traceback (most recent call last):
                File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/datasets/builder.py", line 1848, in _prepare_split_single
                  writer.write_table(table)
                  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^
                File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/datasets/arrow_writer.py", line 765, in write_table
                  self._write_table(pa_table, writer_batch_size=writer_batch_size)
                  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
                File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/datasets/arrow_writer.py", line 773, in _write_table
                  pa_table = table_cast(pa_table, self._schema)
                File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/datasets/table.py", line 2378, in table_cast
                  return cast_table_to_schema(table, schema)
                File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/datasets/table.py", line 2306, in cast_table_to_schema
                  raise CastError(
                  ...<3 lines>...
                  )
              datasets.table.CastError: Couldn't cast
              variant: string
              task: string
              session: string
              control: string
              n_stim: int64
              ceiling: double
              frac_of_ceiling: double
              within_run_normalized: bool
              rsa: double
              p_perm: double
              null_mean: double
              null_sd: double
              z: double
              kind: string
              p_holm: double
              significant: bool
              -- schema metadata --
              pandas: '{"index_columns": [{"kind": "range", "name": null, "start": 0, "' + 2114
              to
              {'task': Value('string'), 'session': Value('string'), 'file': Value('string'), 'within_run_normalized': Value('bool'), 'n_stim': Value('int64'), 'n_subjects_rdm': Value('int64'), 'ceiling_lower': Value('float64'), 'ceiling_upper': Value('float64'), 'ceiling_lower_sem': Value('float64'), 'ceiling_n': Value('int64')}
              because column names don't match
              
              During handling of the above exception, another exception occurred:
              
              Traceback (most recent call last):
                File "/src/services/worker/src/worker/job_runners/config/parquet_and_info.py", line 1369, in compute_config_parquet_and_info_response
                  parquet_operations, partial, estimated_dataset_info = stream_convert_to_parquet(
                                                                        ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^
                      builder, max_dataset_size_bytes=max_dataset_size_bytes
                      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
                  )
                  ^
                File "/src/services/worker/src/worker/job_runners/config/parquet_and_info.py", line 948, in stream_convert_to_parquet
                  builder._prepare_split(split_generator=splits_generators[split], file_format="parquet")
                  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
                File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/datasets/builder.py", line 1694, in _prepare_split
                  for job_id, done, content in self._prepare_split_single(
                                               ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^
                      gen_kwargs=gen_kwargs, job_id=job_id, **_prepare_split_args
                      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
                  ):
                  ^
                File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/datasets/builder.py", line 1850, in _prepare_split_single
                  raise DatasetGenerationCastError.from_cast_error(
                  ...<4 lines>...
                  )
              datasets.exceptions.DatasetGenerationCastError: An error occurred while generating the dataset
              
              All the data files must have the same columns, but at some point there are 12 new columns ({'significant', 'kind', 'p_perm', 'z', 'rsa', 'control', 'ceiling', 'frac_of_ceiling', 'p_holm', 'variant', 'null_mean', 'null_sd'}) and 6 missing columns ({'ceiling_lower', 'n_subjects_rdm', 'ceiling_lower_sem', 'ceiling_upper', 'ceiling_n', 'file'}).
              
              This happened while the csv dataset builder was generating data using
              
              hf://datasets/BrainAlign/brain-lm-alignment-ds006239/control/control_by_cell.csv (at revision c4b9198475ef76716a026459b15f74acca6ae155), ['hf://datasets/BrainAlign/brain-lm-alignment-ds006239@c4b9198475ef76716a026459b15f74acca6ae155/ceilings_ds006239.csv', 'hf://datasets/BrainAlign/brain-lm-alignment-ds006239@c4b9198475ef76716a026459b15f74acca6ae155/control/control_by_cell.csv', 'hf://datasets/BrainAlign/brain-lm-alignment-ds006239@c4b9198475ef76716a026459b15f74acca6ae155/control/control_summary.csv', 'hf://datasets/BrainAlign/brain-lm-alignment-ds006239@c4b9198475ef76716a026459b15f74acca6ae155/control/rdm_dimensionality.csv']
              
              Please either edit the data files to have matching columns, or separate them into different configurations (see docs at https://hf.co/docs/hub/datasets-manual-configuration#multiple-configurations)

Need help to make the dataset viewer work? Make sure to review how to configure the dataset viewer, and open a discussion for direct support.

task
string
session
string
file
string
within_run_normalized
bool
n_stim
int64
n_subjects_rdm
int64
ceiling_lower
float64
ceiling_upper
float64
ceiling_lower_sem
float64
ceiling_n
int64
Orth
ses-11+
data/processed/fmri_wrn/ds006239/Orth/session_rdm_ses-11+.npz
true
96
22
0.562195
0.61485
0.012346
22
Orth
ses-11
data/processed/fmri_wrn/ds006239/Orth/session_rdm_ses-11.npz
true
96
18
0.522525
0.589811
0.016597
18
Phon
ses-11+
data/processed/fmri_wrn/ds006239/Phon/session_rdm_ses-11+.npz
true
96
22
0.562195
0.61485
0.012346
22
Phon
ses-11
data/processed/fmri_wrn/ds006239/Phon/session_rdm_ses-11.npz
true
96
18
0.522525
0.589811
0.016597
18
Sem
ses-11+
data/processed/fmri_wrn/ds006239/Sem/session_rdm_ses-11+.npz
true
48
22
0.356634
0.438561
0.013141
22
Sem
ses-11
data/processed/fmri_wrn/ds006239/Sem/session_rdm_ses-11.npz
true
48
18
0.289344
0.394831
0.011896
18
SemLocal
ses-11+
data/processed/fmri_wrn/ds006239/SemLocal/session_rdm_ses-11+.npz
true
48
23
0.305571
0.38963
0.019058
23
SemLocal
ses-11
data/processed/fmri_wrn/ds006239/SemLocal/session_rdm_ses-11.npz
true
48
15
0.230569
0.364206
0.01661
15
Orth
ses-11
null
true
96
null
null
null
null
null
Orth
ses-11+
null
true
96
null
null
null
null
null
Phon
ses-11
null
true
96
null
null
null
null
null
Phon
ses-11+
null
true
96
null
null
null
null
null
Sem
ses-11
null
true
48
null
null
null
null
null
Sem
ses-11+
null
true
48
null
null
null
null
null
SemLocal
ses-11
null
true
48
null
null
null
null
null
SemLocal
ses-11+
null
true
48
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
null
Orth
ses-11
null
null
96
null
null
null
null
null
Orth
ses-11+
null
null
96
null
null
null
null
null
Phon
ses-11
null
null
96
null
null
null
null
null
Phon
ses-11+
null
null
96
null
null
null
null
null
Sem
ses-11
null
null
48
null
null
null
null
null
Sem
ses-11+
null
null
48
null
null
null
null
null
SemLocal
ses-11
null
null
48
null
null
null
null
null
SemLocal
ses-11+
null
null
48
null
null
null
null
null

YAML Metadata Warning:empty or missing yaml metadata in repo card

Check out the documentation for more information.

Brain–language-model alignment: ds006239

Wang et al. 2025 — word-level phonological and semantic reading tasks in children and adolescents aged 10–17.

Read this first: does the measurement work?

Every alignment number in this dataset is only as meaningful as the brain RDMs it was computed against. So before any model result, the same pipeline is asked whether anything stimulus-driven correlates with those RDMs — stimulus duration, intensity, word length, frequency, phoneme and syllable counts, an acoustic model of the audio where the stimuli are audio, and the study's own condition contrast — each tested by a permutation test that shuffles stimulus identity.

GATE: FAILED. 0/8 stimulus tests are significant after Holm correction — not the acoustic model of the audio the children actually heard, not the study's own experimental contrast.

The alignment numbers below are therefore uninterpretable as evidence about language models. They measure a representational geometry that does not demonstrably encode the stimuli. They are published for completeness and for whoever fixes the estimator, not as a result. Do not cite them as evidence that models fail to align with the developing brain.

Measured cause, from control/:

  • RDM effective rank: 52 of 72 stimuli

Note that this is NOT ds003604's failure mode. There, the RDM effective rank was ~3 of 40-48 stimuli -- near-degenerate betas that could not express stimulus-level structure at all. The rank recorded above is a large fraction of the stimulus count, so these RDMs do carry stimulus structure and the control failing here means the specific controls tested did not reach significance, not that the measurement is uninterpretable. Check control/ for which controls ran: an acoustic or visual control needs the dataset's stimulus files present, and reports zero features if they are not.

What was built

8 task × session cells, each an RDM over the stimuli shared by that cell's subjects, with voxel patterns z-scored within run before aggregation (without that, the RDM measures scanner drift rather than language) and an inter-subject noise ceiling.

task session n_stim ceiling_lower ceiling_upper ceiling_n
Orth ses-11+ 96 0.562195 0.61485 22
Orth ses-11 96 0.522525 0.589811 18
Phon ses-11+ 96 0.562195 0.61485 22
Phon ses-11 96 0.522525 0.589811 18
Sem ses-11+ 48 0.356634 0.438561 22
Sem ses-11 48 0.289344 0.394831 18
SemLocal ses-11+ 48 0.305571 0.38963 23
SemLocal ses-11 48 0.230569 0.364206 15

Dataset-specific notes

Contains LocalSem, the only genuinely run/stimulus-CROSSED language cell across all four datasets in this project: its stimuli recur across runs, so run identity and stimulus identity are separable and the scanner-run confound that invalidated the first ds003604 analysis cannot arise. Per-subject age is NOT recoverable from the release — participants.tsv has birthdate but no scan date and there are no *_scans.tsv files — so this dataset is cohort-level only and cannot carry the developmental axis as published.

Files

path what
alignment_by_checkpoint.csv every model × checkpoint × cell, with ceiling
alignment_by_family.csv per family, with equivalence tests
alignment_by_cell.csv per task × session
ceilings_*.csv noise ceiling per cell
control/ the positive control and RDM dimensionality — the gate
scale_ladder.csv the Pythia 70M→1.4B scale test
fig_*.pdf, fig_*.png figures

Method

Representational similarity analysis. For each cell, a brain RDM over stimuli (correlation distance between per-stimulus GLM beta patterns, within-run z-scored, aggregated across subjects) is compared by Spearman correlation with a model RDM over the same stimuli, taken from each checkpoint's hidden states. Alignment is reported raw and as a fraction of the inter-subject noise ceiling, and judged against a null built from the PARC suite — 18 models differing only by random seed, which is what 'no effect' looks like on this measurement.

Null and fixation trials are excluded from the stimulus set. For paired designs the stimulus identity is the pair, not either word alone.

Downloads last month
-