YAML Metadata Warning:empty or missing yaml metadata in repo card

Check out the documentation for more information.

DETTOOLS

DETTOOLS is a deterministic local MCP for token-efficient code ingestion and precise AST/CST-aware changes. It returns compact structured results while preserving the exact source requested by the caller.

Author: Ouroboros

Files and contact

The release includes an exact wheel contents list and a browseable source manifest. The source snapshot is extracted byte-for-byte from the published wheel; the wheel remains the supported install artifact.

Licence

DETTOOLS is released under the MIT License. You may use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and sell copies subject to the licence terms.

Installation

DETTOOLS requires Python 3.11 or newer. Install the release-gated wheel in the environment used by your MCP client:

python -m pip install dettools-0.9.0-py3-none-any.whl

The base install provides Python-aware reads and whole-file fallback for other languages. For the C, C#, C++, Go, Java, JavaScript, Ruby, Rust, and TypeScript structure and exact-symbol reads used in the nine-language benchmark, install the wheel with its declared treesitter extra:

python -m pip install "dettools[treesitter] @ file:///absolute/path/to/dettools-0.9.0-py3-none-any.whl"

Configure the MCP server with a portable Python command:

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "dettools": {
      "command": "python",
      "args": ["-m", "dettools.mcp_server"],
      "env": {
        "DETTOOLS_PUBLIC_MODE": "1"
      }
    }
  }
}

The command-line front door is also available:

python -m dettools.cli --request-file request.json

Agent setup

DETTOOLS uses the standard Model Context Protocol over a local stdio process. It is not tied to a particular provider or model. GPT-based agents, Codex, and Claude clients that support local stdio MCP servers can use the same server. Only the client-specific location of the MCP configuration changes.

A setup agent should:

  1. Verify the supplied wheel against SHA256SUMS.txt.
  2. Use Python 3.11 or newer and install the wheel in an environment the MCP client can launch. Install the declared treesitter extra when multilingual structure and exact-symbol reads are required.
  3. Add the local stdio configuration shown above to the client's MCP configuration, then restart or reload the client.
  4. Initialize the server and verify that list_tools returns exactly the 25 tools documented below. Call tool_capabilities, then smoke-test repo_state, auto_read, and read_symbol against a small repository.
  5. Report the Python interpreter used, installed DETTOOLS version, wheel SHA-256, configuration file changed, tool count, and smoke-test results.

Once configured, agents should use auto_read as the default code-ingestion path and use read_symbol or read_symbols when exact manual control is needed. For mutations, preview the change, create a checkpoint before risky work, apply the smallest scoped edit, run focused tests, and restore the checkpoint if verification fails.

Fail closed if the checksum does not match, initialization fails, the server exposes undocumented tools, or the expected public tool surface changes. Do not assume the MCP configuration file is in the same location across Codex, Claude, or other clients.

A copyable instruction for another agent is:

Set up DETTOOLS from the supplied wheel as a local stdio MCP server. Verify the wheel against SHA256SUMS.txt; use Python 3.11 or newer; install the treesitter extra when multilingual exact-symbol reads are required; add python -m dettools.mcp_server with DETTOOLS_PUBLIC_MODE=1 to this client's MCP configuration; restart the client; verify exactly the documented 25-tool surface; smoke-test repo_state, auto_read, and read_symbol; and report every file or configuration changed. Do not change repository visibility or publish artifacts unless explicitly authorized.

Standalone MCP tools

Code ingestion:

  • auto_read
  • recommend_read_strategy
  • file_shape
  • read_symbol
  • read_symbols
  • read_symbols_multi
  • symbol_locator
  • reference_finder

Analysis and verification:

  • repo_state
  • workspace_health
  • generated_file_detector
  • parse_check
  • import_check
  • interface_guard
  • ambiguity_detector
  • diff_guard
  • preflight_change_gate
  • change_impact
  • test_scope_mapper
  • test_runner_compact
  • tool_capabilities

Precise changes and recovery:

  • scoped_patcher
  • reference_aware_rename
  • create_checkpoint
  • restore_checkpoint

Standalone DETTOOLS runs locally and exposes only the documented tool set.

Supported languages

Structure and exact symbol reads support Python and, when the optional Tree-sitter dependencies are installed, C, C#, C++, Go, Java, JavaScript, Ruby, Rust, and TypeScript.

Mutation operations are intentionally Python-only:

  • replace a function body
  • replace a method body
  • insert an import
  • replace an assignment value
  • rename a symbol with reference updates

Preview and preflight checks run before an apply. Mutations support automatic verification, checkpoints, and rollback when verification fails.

Deterministic ingestion-payload benchmark

No LLM was invoked in this benchmark. It measures serialized code-ingestion payloads after each requested target is fixed.

The nine-language run installed the wheel's declared treesitter extra. Without that extra, non-Python inputs use whole-file fallback: requested source is still preserved, but those fallback reads are not represented by the multilingual token-reduction result below.

The evaluation compared each serialized DETTOOLS MCP response with a deduplicated whole-file baseline that serialized every required source file exactly once. Token counts use the cl100k_base tokenizer.

reduction = 1 - (DETTOOLS serialized tokens / baseline serialized tokens)

Measurement Result
Held-out scenarios 27
Languages 9
Sequential symbol reads 81
Baseline size per scenario at least 8,000 cl100k_base tokens
Requested exact source per scenario no more than 5% of the deduplicated whole-file baseline
Mean token reduction 95.75%
Minimum token reduction 91.47%
Exact requested source preserved 27/27 scenarios
Exact sequential reads preserved 81/81 reads
Dense-request control mean 57.76%

Supported claim: On held-out, nine-language targeted code-ingestion workflows with at least 8,000 baseline tokens and requested exact source no greater than 5% of the deduplicated whole-file baseline, DETTOOLS reduced serialized MCP code-ingestion tokens by 95.75% on average and by at least 91.47% in every tested scenario while preserving the exact requested source.

DETTOOLS preserved the requested source in every scenario. Dense-request controls averaged 57.76%; those requests required a larger share of the baseline source to be returned, so a larger share was serialized.

End-to-end agent usage

A separate paired 20-task controlled-mutation benchmark ran coding agents on the DETTOOLS repository using Azure gpt-5.3-chat. Both arms used the same model, prompt, mutation, edit and test tools, iteration limit, and seeded alternating order. The baseline arm used standard file and search readers; the other arm added DETTOOLS read tools. Counts are provider-reported total agent tokens.

Measurement Result
Baseline total tokens 455,313
DETTOOLS total tokens 246,495
Aggregate reduction 45.9%
Mean per-task reduction 43.5%
Tasks using fewer tokens 18/20
DETTOOLS targeted tests passed 19/20
Baseline targeted tests passed 17/20

Mean per-task reduction was 43.5% (95% bootstrap CI 30.4%–54.8%). Observed targeted-test success was 19/20 with DETTOOLS and 17/20 with standard readers; this sample does not establish a quality difference.

This result covers one repository, one model, and 20 controlled mutation tasks. It measures total agent usage rather than serialized MCP payload alone.

Privacy boundary

Public install artifacts are wheel-only and fail closed to the documented tool set. The build gate rejects development material, generated state, raw test outputs, and machine-specific paths. Standalone installations do not write usage records.

Downloads last month

-

Downloads are not tracked for this model. How to track
Inference Providers NEW
This model isn't deployed by any Inference Provider. 🙋 Ask for provider support

Collection including cjc0013/dettools