"Open" is a status, not a roadmap — Soofi S is currently gated

#3
by mullerse - opened

The Soofi-S-Base model card states, verbatim: "This model is a beta preview and a research artifact. It is not an open release." Access is limited to "already selected partners" and gated behind a contact-details form. The instruct preview is labelled "Preview" and distributed under the same closed conditions.

These facts are not compatible with the label "sovereign open source foundation model." Whatever the documentation promises about future licensing, the observable state is: gated access, selected partners, release date unspecified ("as soon as it is ready"). That is a preview, not an open model. The distinction is not cosmetic — it decides who may build on the model and who is excluded.

Two consequences:

Builders are excluded. Open weights create value only when anyone can download, fine-tune, and deploy without asking. A contact-details form is a permission check. The fix is known and trivial; the weights are already on the hub.
Time works against the release. This project is publicly funded and positions itself as the sovereign European alternative. Every month spent on partner betas and "coming weeks" announcements is a month in which the field moves on. A model announced as open and delivered late arrives outdated. That is the recurring pattern of German publicly funded AI: maximal announcement, gated access, delayed delivery — by which time international competitors have already shipped the next generation.
Proposal, minimal:

Remove the contact-details requirement for the base model immediately.
Publish the permissive license with a concrete date.
Call the preview a preview, and reserve the word "open" for what is actually open.
Public funding and the word "open" create an obligation to ship open. Everything short of that is a beta with a press release.

Sign up or log in to comment