Threat Model & Safety Boundaries
Scope & Context
This is mathematical research with no physical implementation. Safety boundaries prevent misuse and clarify what can and cannot be harmed.
Assets
| Asset | Current Threat | Mitigation | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| SHA-512/SHA-3 | Hypothetical quantum preimage | Reduced-round only (r β€ 16) | β Safe |
| RSA/ECDSA keys | Not in scope | No number-theoretic algorithms | β Safe |
| Cryptanalytic algorithm | Misuse on real protocols | Research-only toy model | β Safe |
| Quantum architecture | Dual-use computing | Theoretical only; Ξ½=12/5 unproven | β Safe |
| Formal proofs | False confidence | Explicit axioms for unproven claims |
β Safe |
Safety Boundaries (Strictly Enforced)
Allowed
β Classical brute-force on reduced-round SHA-520 (r β€ 16) β Quantum simulation on toy models (16-bit output, 4-round) β Theoretical braid compilation (no physical generation) β Academic publication & GitHub distribution
Forbidden
β Full-round (r=80) cryptanalysis β Key recovery attempts on real protocols β Hardware construction without explicit authorization β Public deployment of any "attack" β Claims of breaking SHA-512/SHA-3
What This Work is NOT
- β A deployed attack system
- β A production cryptanalysis tool
- β An escape from classical computational limits
- β A threat to modern cryptography
Responsible Disclosure
For academic use:
- Cite as "research model"
- Clarify "no physical implementation"
- Include falsification criteria in publications
For security professionals:
- This is NOT a threat to current systems
- Focus on post-quantum migration
- This is educational about topological QC
Boundaries frozen. Disclosure locked. No exceptions.