SNAPKITTYWEST's picture
push from SNAPKITTYWEST/topological-quantum-computer
d6f21bb verified
|
Raw
History Blame Contribute Delete
2.1 kB

Architecture: Topological Quantum Computer (Fibonacci Anyon Model)

System Overview

PHYSICAL LAYER          LOGICAL LAYER           APPLICATION LAYER
─────────────           ────────────            ─────────────────
2DEG / FQH Ξ½=12/5  ←→  Fusion Space  ←→  Cryptanalytic Algorithm
                        (Ο„ anyons)           (SHA-520 preimage)
                        Braiding Gates
                        (F-moves, R-moves)

1. Fibonacci Anyon Theory (SU(2)₃)

Fusion rules:

  • Ο„ Γ— Ο„ = 1 + Ο„
  • 1 Γ— Ο„ = Ο„
  • Ο„ Γ— 1 = Ο„
  • 1 Γ— 1 = 1

Quantum dimensions: d₁ = 1, d_Ο„ = Ο† = 1.618..., D_total β‰ˆ 1.902

Key theorem: dim(V_n) = F_{n-1} (Fibonacci numbers) for n Ο„-anyons with total charge 1

2. Braiding (R-Matrices)

Eigenvalues for τ×τ:

  • R^{ττ}_1 = e^{-4Ο€i/5} (vacuum)
  • R^{ττ}_Ο„ = e^{3Ο€i/5} (Ο„ channel)

These are 10th roots of unity β†’ dense in SU(2) with F-moves.

3. Logical Qubit Encodings

4-Ο„ Standard (recommended):

  • |0⟩_L = |((ττ)₁(ττ)₁)β‚βŸ©
  • |1⟩_L = |((ττ)_Ο„(ττ)_Ο„)β‚βŸ©
  • Total charge = 1 (vacuum) β†’ interferometric measurement possible
  • 4 physical anyons per logical qubit

Asymptotic qubit density: n_max β‰ˆ 0.694N - 1.16 logical qubits from N physical anyons

4. Braid Compilation

Solovay-Kitaev: L(Ξ΅) = O(log^3.97(1/Ξ΅)) for Ξ΅-precision

Pipeline: Clifford+T β†’ Braid word optimization β†’ Solovay-Kitaev β†’ Adiabatic schedule β†’ Voltage gates on 2DEG

5. Scaling Limits

Topological advantage lost at ~10⁴-10⁡ anyons due to:

  • Adiabatic timing constraints
  • Control complexity (O(N) gates)
  • Interferometry crosstalk
  • Thermal anyon density
  • Fabrication yield limits

References

  • Kitaev, A. (2003). "Fault-tolerant quantum computation by anyons." Annals of Physics.
  • Freedman, Larsen, Wang (2002). "Two-eigenvalue problem and Jones representations."

Frozen by Ahmad. Falsifiable by experiment.