Text Generation
Transformers
GGUF
English
sft
unsloth
science
reasoning
conversational
Scie-R1-GGUF / README.md
Rustamshry's picture
Update README.md
a24a353 verified
---
library_name: transformers
tags:
- sft
- unsloth
- science
- reasoning
license: apache-2.0
datasets:
- mattwesney/CoT_Reasoning_Scientific_Discovery_and_Research
language:
- en
base_model:
- khazarai/Scie-R1
pipeline_tag: text-generation
---
# Model Card for Qwen3-CoT-Scientific-Research
## Model Description
GGUF version of https://huggingface.co/khazarai/Scie-R1
- **Base Model:** Qwen3-1.7B
- **Task:** Scientific Reasoning with Chain-of-Thought (CoT)
- **Dataset:** [moremilk/CoT_Reasoning_Scientific_Discovery_and_Research](https://huggingface.co/datasets/moremilk/CoT_Reasoning_Scientific_Discovery_and_Research)
- **Training Objective:** Encourage step-by-step logical deductions for scientific reasoning problems
## Uses
### Direct Use
This fine-tuned model is designed for:
- Assisting in teaching and learning scientific reasoning
- Supporting educational AI assistants in science classrooms
- Demonstrating step-by-step scientific reasoning in research training contexts
- Serving as a resource for automated reasoning systems to better emulate structured scientific logic
It is not intended to replace human researchers, perform advanced analytics, or generate novel scientific discoveries.
## Bias, Risks, and Limitations
- May oversimplify complex or interdisciplinary problems
- Performance limited by the scope of training data (primarily introductory-level scientific reasoning tasks)
- Does not handle real-world experimentation or advanced statistical modeling
- May produce incorrect reasoning if the prompt is highly ambiguous
## Training Data
**Scope**
This model was fine-tuned on tasks that involve core scientific reasoning:
- Formulating testable hypotheses
- Identifying independent and dependent variables
- Designing simple controlled experiments
- Interpreting graphs, tables, and basic data representations
- Understanding relationships between evidence and conclusions
- Recognizing simple logical fallacies in scientific arguments
**Illustrative Examples**
- Drawing conclusions from experimental results
- Evaluating alternative explanations for observed data
- Explaining step-by-step reasoning behind scientific conclusions
**Emphasis on Chain-of-Thought (CoT)**
- The dataset highlights explicit reasoning steps, making the model better at producing step-by-step explanations when solving scientific reasoning tasks.
- Focus on Foundational Knowledge
- The dataset aims to strengthen models in foundational scientific reasoning skills rather than covering all domains of scientific knowledge.
**Focus on Foundational Knowledge**
The dataset aims to strengthen models in foundational scientific reasoning skills rather than covering all domains of scientific knowledge.