Model is not open source or open weights due to commercial use restrictions. "Shared weights" is a more appropriate label

#21

by dmhf - opened Jan 8

base: refs/heads/main

←

from: refs/pr/21

Discussion Files changed

-2

dmhf

Jan 8

•

edited Jan 9

Model is not open source or open weights due to commercial use restrictions. Shared weights or weights available label is more appropriate. See https://opensource.org/osd for the open source definition.

Calling it open source could confuse users into thinking they can incorporate it into their product freely (at any scale).

Model is not open source or open weights due to commercial use restrictions. Shared source label is more appropriate.1ebd7cfe

dmhf changed pull request title from Model is not open source or open weights due to commercial use restrictions. Shared source label is more appropriate. to Model is not open source or open weights due to commercial use restrictions. "Shared weights" is a more appropriate label Jan 8

FriskyFennec

Jan 9

I agree, the model should not be stating "Fully Open Source" in the marketing material.

rluxemburg changed pull request status to closed Feb 6

Upload images, audio, and videos by dragging in the text input, pasting, or clicking here.

Tap or paste here to upload images

· Sign up or log in to comment