Could the LICENSE file be added to this weights repository?

#19

by WaveEngine - opened 6 days ago

Hello, and thank you for releasing ACE-Step openly.

We are using the model commercially, in short films for a small studio, and we
keep a record of the licence terms for everything we build on. While putting
that record together we noticed a difference between the two repositories:

the code repository (github.com/ace-step/ACE-Step) contains a full LICENSE
file with the Apache License 2.0 text;
this weights repository declares license: apache-2.0 in the model metadata,
but contains no LICENSE file.

Would you consider adding the licence text to this repository as well? For
anyone documenting the terms they build on, a file in the repository is
stronger evidence than a metadata field, and it removes the question entirely.

We are asking rather than assuming. If the metadata declaration is the intended
and complete statement of the terms for the weights, saying so here would help
us just as much as the file itself.

Thank you for your work on this.

Upload images, audio, and videos by dragging in the text input, pasting, or clicking here.

Tap or paste here to upload images

· Sign up or log in to comment