File size: 4,459 Bytes
9ecc04a
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
[
  {
    "name": "Transition Dataset",
    "type": "Dataset Pattern",
    "focus": "One-step dynamics",
    "best_for": [
      "Dynamics learning",
      "Control",
      "Simple environments"
    ],
    "required": [
      "observation_t",
      "action_t",
      "observation_t+1"
    ],
    "optional": [
      "reward",
      "done",
      "goal",
      "timestamp"
    ],
    "risk": "Frame-level random splits can leak nearly identical states across train and test."
  },
  {
    "name": "Episode Dataset",
    "type": "Dataset Pattern",
    "focus": "Sequential dynamics",
    "best_for": [
      "Rollouts",
      "Memory",
      "Long-horizon modeling"
    ],
    "required": [
      "episode_id",
      "observations[]",
      "actions[]"
    ],
    "optional": [
      "rewards[]",
      "terminal",
      "instruction",
      "metadata"
    ],
    "risk": "Broken episode boundaries can destroy temporal structure."
  },
  {
    "name": "Multimodal Episode",
    "type": "Dataset Pattern",
    "focus": "Cross-modal world state",
    "best_for": [
      "Robotics",
      "Embodied AI",
      "Physical AI"
    ],
    "required": [
      "video",
      "actions",
      "robot_state"
    ],
    "optional": [
      "depth",
      "audio",
      "language",
      "force",
      "pose"
    ],
    "risk": "Unsynchronized modalities create false transition errors."
  },
  {
    "name": "One-Step Benchmark",
    "type": "Benchmark Pattern",
    "focus": "Immediate next-state prediction",
    "best_for": [
      "Fast iteration",
      "Architecture debugging"
    ],
    "required": [
      "held-out transitions",
      "prediction metric"
    ],
    "optional": [
      "uncertainty",
      "per-task breakdown"
    ],
    "risk": "Can hide catastrophic long-horizon drift."
  },
  {
    "name": "Multi-Horizon Benchmark",
    "type": "Benchmark Pattern",
    "focus": "Error growth over time",
    "best_for": [
      "Rollouts",
      "Planning",
      "Simulation"
    ],
    "required": [
      "horizons",
      "rollout protocol",
      "per-horizon metric"
    ],
    "optional": [
      "drift ratio",
      "consistency score"
    ],
    "risk": "Averaging across horizons can conceal where failure begins."
  },
  {
    "name": "Action Fidelity Benchmark",
    "type": "Benchmark Pattern",
    "focus": "Correct action consequences",
    "best_for": [
      "Robotics",
      "Interactive worlds",
      "Agents"
    ],
    "required": [
      "paired actions",
      "ground-truth transitions"
    ],
    "optional": [
      "counterfactual actions",
      "action sensitivity"
    ],
    "risk": "Visual similarity alone does not prove correct causal response."
  },
  {
    "name": "OOD Generalization Split",
    "type": "Split Strategy",
    "focus": "Distribution shift",
    "best_for": [
      "Deployment",
      "Robotics",
      "Robustness"
    ],
    "required": [
      "held-out environments or tasks"
    ],
    "optional": [
      "held-out objects",
      "held-out embodiments"
    ],
    "risk": "Random splits can dramatically overestimate generalization."
  },
  {
    "name": "Planning Utility Benchmark",
    "type": "Benchmark Pattern",
    "focus": "Downstream decision quality",
    "best_for": [
      "Agents",
      "MPC",
      "Model-based RL"
    ],
    "required": [
      "planner",
      "task success metric",
      "world-model rollouts"
    ],
    "optional": [
      "regret",
      "return",
      "sample efficiency"
    ],
    "risk": "Prediction scores may not correlate with better decisions."
  },
  {
    "name": "Control Benchmark",
    "type": "Benchmark Pattern",
    "focus": "Closed-loop task performance",
    "best_for": [
      "Robotics",
      "Autonomous systems"
    ],
    "required": [
      "environment",
      "policy/controller",
      "success metric"
    ],
    "optional": [
      "safety violations",
      "energy",
      "path efficiency"
    ],
    "risk": "Offline prediction quality may not transfer to closed-loop control."
  },
  {
    "name": "Efficiency Benchmark",
    "type": "Benchmark Pattern",
    "focus": "Operational cost",
    "best_for": [
      "Real-time systems",
      "Large search spaces"
    ],
    "required": [
      "latency",
      "memory",
      "throughput"
    ],
    "optional": [
      "energy",
      "rollouts/sec",
      "cost"
    ],
    "risk": "A strong model may be unusable if rollouts are too slow for planning."
  }
]