Spaces:
Running
Running
File size: 10,319 Bytes
e72f783 4756353 e72f783 | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 | # src/xai.py
# Four XAI methods — each answers a different question
#
# Method 1 — PatchCore anomaly map: WHERE is the defect? (in patchcore.py)
# Method 2 — GradCAM++: WHICH features triggered the classifier?
# Method 3 — SHAP waterfall: WHY is the score this specific number?
# Method 4 — Retrieval trace: WHAT in history is this most similar to?
import os
import json
import base64
import io
import numpy as np
import torch
import torch.nn as nn
import torchvision.models as models
import torchvision.transforms as T
import shap
from PIL import Image
import cv2
DATA_DIR = os.environ.get("DATA_DIR", "data")
DEVICE = "cpu"
IMG_SIZE = 224
class GradCAMPlusPlus:
"""
GradCAM++ on EfficientNet-B0.
Why GradCAM++ not basic GradCAM:
Basic GradCAM uses only positive gradients, producing fragmented maps.
GradCAM++ uses a weighted combination of both positive and negative
gradients, resulting in more focused, anatomically precise maps.
Same implementation complexity — direct upgrade.
Why a separate EfficientNet:
PatchCore has no gradient flow (it's a memory bank + k-NN).
GradCAM++ requires differentiable activations.
EfficientNet is fine-tuned on MVTec binary classification solely
to provide gradients for this XAI method — never used for scoring.
"""
def __init__(self, data_dir=DATA_DIR):
self.data_dir = data_dir
self.model = None
self.transform = T.Compose([
T.Resize((IMG_SIZE, IMG_SIZE)),
T.ToTensor(),
T.Normalize(mean=[0.485, 0.456, 0.406],
std=[0.229, 0.224, 0.225])
])
def load(self):
self.model = models.efficientnet_b0(pretrained=False)
self.model.classifier = nn.Sequential(
nn.Dropout(p=0.3),
nn.Linear(1280, 2)
)
weights_path = os.path.join(self.data_dir, "efficientnet_b0.pt")
if os.path.exists(weights_path):
self.model.load_state_dict(
torch.load(weights_path, map_location="cpu")
)
else:
# Fallback: pretrained ImageNet weights (weaker XAI but not None)
self.model = models.efficientnet_b0(
weights=models.EfficientNet_B0_Weights.IMAGENET1K_V1
)
print("WARNING: EfficientNet fine-tuned weights not found. "
"Using ImageNet pretrained — GradCAM++ quality reduced.")
self.model = self.model.to(DEVICE)
self.model.eval()
print("GradCAM++ (EfficientNet-B0) loaded")
def compute(self, pil_img: Image.Image) -> np.ndarray:
"""
Compute GradCAM++ activation map.
Target layer: model.features[-1]
Returns: [224, 224] float32 array in [0, 1], or None if fails.
"""
if self.model is None:
return None
try:
tensor = self.transform(pil_img).unsqueeze(0).to(DEVICE)
tensor.requires_grad_(True)
# Storage for hook outputs
activations = {}
gradients = {}
def forward_hook(module, input, output):
activations["feat"] = output
def backward_hook(module, grad_in, grad_out):
gradients["feat"] = grad_out[0]
# Register hooks on last feature block
target_layer = self.model.features[-1]
fwd_handle = target_layer.register_forward_hook(forward_hook)
bwd_handle = target_layer.register_full_backward_hook(backward_hook)
# Forward pass
with torch.enable_grad():
output = self.model(tensor)
pred_class = output.argmax(dim=1).item()
score = output[0, pred_class]
self.model.zero_grad()
score.backward()
fwd_handle.remove()
bwd_handle.remove()
# GradCAM++ weights
# α = ReLU(grad)² / (2*ReLU(grad)² + sum(A)*ReLU(grad)³)
grads = gradients["feat"] # [1, C, H, W]
acts = activations["feat"] # [1, C, H, W]
grads_relu = torch.relu(grads)
acts_sum = acts.sum(dim=(2, 3), keepdim=True)
alpha_num = grads_relu ** 2
alpha_denom = 2 * grads_relu**2 + acts_sum * grads_relu**3 + 1e-8
alpha = alpha_num / alpha_denom
weights = (alpha * torch.relu(grads)).sum(dim=(2, 3),
keepdim=True)
cam = (weights * acts).sum(dim=1, keepdim=True)
cam = torch.relu(cam).squeeze().cpu().numpy()
# Upsample to 224x224
cam_pil = Image.fromarray(cam)
cam = np.array(cam_pil.resize((IMG_SIZE, IMG_SIZE),
Image.BILINEAR), dtype=np.float32)
# Normalise
cam_min, cam_max = cam.min(), cam.max()
if cam_max - cam_min > 1e-8:
cam = (cam - cam_min) / (cam_max - cam_min)
return cam
except Exception as e:
print(f"GradCAM++ failed: {e}")
return None
class SHAPExplainer:
"""
SHAP waterfall chart for anomaly score.
Explains score as function of 5 human-readable features.
The 5 features:
- mean_patch_distance: avg k-NN distance (pervasive texture anomaly)
- max_patch_distance: max k-NN distance = image anomaly score
- depth_variance: from MiDaS (complex 3D surface)
- edge_density: fraction of Canny edge pixels
- texture_regularity: FFT low-frequency energy ratio
Interview line: "A QC manager reads the SHAP chart and understands
why the model flagged this image without knowing what a neural net is."
"""
def __init__(self):
self.explainer = None
self._background_features = None
self._background_loaded = False
def load_background(self, background_path: str = None):
"""
Load background features for SHAP TreeExplainer.
Background = sample of normal image features from training set.
"""
if background_path and os.path.exists(background_path):
self._background_features = np.load(background_path)
print(f"SHAP background loaded: {self._background_features.shape}")
else:
# Fallback: use zeros as background (weaker but functional)
self._background_features = np.zeros((10, 5), dtype=np.float32)
print("SHAP using zero background (background_features.npy not found)")
self._background_loaded = True
def build_feature_vector(self,
patch_scores: np.ndarray,
depth_stats: dict,
fft_features: dict,
edge_features: dict) -> np.ndarray:
"""
Assemble the 5 SHAP features from computed signals.
Returns: [5] float32 array
"""
return np.array([
float(patch_scores.mean()), # mean_patch_distance
float(patch_scores.max()), # max_patch_distance
float(depth_stats.get("depth_variance", 0.0)),
float(edge_features.get("edge_density", 0.0)),
float(fft_features.get("low_freq_ratio", 0.0))
], dtype=np.float32)
def explain(self, feature_vector: np.ndarray) -> dict:
"""
Compute SHAP values for one feature vector.
Returns dict with feature names, values, and SHAP contributions.
"""
FEATURE_NAMES = [
"mean_patch_distance",
"max_patch_distance",
"depth_variance",
"edge_density",
"texture_regularity"
]
if not self._background_loaded:
return self._fallback_explain(feature_vector, FEATURE_NAMES)
try:
# Simple linear approximation for portfolio:
# SHAP values proportional to deviation from background mean
bg_mean = self._background_features.mean(axis=0)
deviations = feature_vector - bg_mean
total = np.abs(deviations).sum() + 1e-8
shap_values = deviations * (feature_vector.sum() / total)
return {
"feature_names": FEATURE_NAMES,
"feature_values": feature_vector.tolist(),
"shap_values": shap_values.tolist(),
"base_value": float(bg_mean.mean()),
"prediction": float(feature_vector.sum())
}
except Exception as e:
print(f"SHAP explain failed: {e}")
return self._fallback_explain(feature_vector, FEATURE_NAMES)
def _fallback_explain(self, features, names):
return {
"feature_names": names,
"feature_values": features.tolist(),
"shap_values": features.tolist(),
"base_value": 0.0,
"prediction": float(features.max())
}
def heatmap_to_base64(heatmap: np.ndarray,
original_img: Image.Image = None) -> str:
"""
Convert [224, 224] float32 heatmap to base64 PNG.
If original_img provided: overlay heatmap on original (jet colormap).
"""
heatmap_uint8 = (heatmap * 255).astype(np.uint8)
heatmap_color = cv2.applyColorMap(heatmap_uint8, cv2.COLORMAP_JET)
heatmap_rgb = cv2.cvtColor(heatmap_color, cv2.COLOR_BGR2RGB)
if original_img is not None:
orig_np = np.array(original_img.resize((224, 224)))
overlay = (0.6 * orig_np + 0.4 * heatmap_rgb).astype(np.uint8)
result_img = Image.fromarray(overlay)
else:
result_img = Image.fromarray(heatmap_rgb)
buf = io.BytesIO()
result_img.save(buf, format="PNG")
return base64.b64encode(buf.getvalue()).decode("utf-8")
def image_to_base64(pil_img: Image.Image,
size: tuple = (224, 224)) -> str:
"""Convert PIL image to base64 PNG string."""
img = pil_img.resize(size)
buf = io.BytesIO()
img.save(buf, format="PNG")
return base64.b64encode(buf.getvalue()).decode("utf-8")
# Global instances
gradcam = GradCAMPlusPlus()
shap_explainer = SHAPExplainer() |