Download code/old/resonability_check_completeness_openai_V1.py from shahidul034/readCtrl_lambda: direct link, hf CLI and curl.
- Browser
- Download file 6.14 kB
-
https://huggingface.co/shahidul034/readCtrl_lambda/resolve/main/code/old/resonability_check_completeness_openai_V1.py
- Command line
-
hf download hf://shahidul034/readCtrl_lambda/code/old/resonability_check_completeness_openai_V1.py
-
curl -L -o resonability_check_completeness_openai_V1.py https://huggingface.co/shahidul034/readCtrl_lambda/resolve/main/code/old/resonability_check_completeness_openai_V1.py
6.14 kB
| import os, json | |
| def return_promptst(reference_summary, generated_summary, subclaims_json, difficulty_level): | |
| prompt=f''' | |
| **SYSTEM / ROLE INSTRUCTION:** | |
| You are a **medical readability evaluator**. | |
| Your task is to judge whether omitted subclaims (those with `"result": 0"`) from a generated summary are *reasonably omitted* based on the intended **readability level**: *easy*, *intermediate*, or *hard*. | |
| You evaluate this from the standpoint of clarity, faithfulness, and readability goals. | |
| --- | |
| ### **READABILITY GUIDELINES** | |
| | Level | Target Audience | Content Expectation | Technical Detail Allowed | | |
| | :--------------- | :--------------------------------------- | :-------------------------------------------------------------- | :--------------------------------------------------------------- | | |
| | **Easy** | General public | Focus on main events, outcomes, and diagnoses in plain Spanish. | Minimal — avoid measurements, anatomy, and test results. | | |
| | **Intermediate** | Educated lay readers or medical students | Include key findings and procedures in simplified form. | Moderate — basic terms and causes allowed. | | |
| | **Hard** | Medical professionals | Retain most technical information and precision. | High — measurements, anatomy, and test interpretations expected. | | |
| --- | |
| ### **INPUT FIELDS** | |
| **Reference summary:** | |
| {reference_summary} | |
| **Generated summary ({difficulty_level}):** | |
| {generated_summary} | |
| **Subclaims and results:** | |
| {subclaims_json} | |
| --- | |
| ### **TASK INSTRUCTIONS** | |
| 1. Focus on subclaims with `"result": 0"` (not supported by the generated summary). | |
| 2. For each omitted subclaim: | |
| * Decide whether omission is **reasonable** given the readability level. | |
| * Label as: `"yes"`, `"no"`, or `"borderline"`. | |
| * Write a brief justification (1–2 sentences). | |
| 3. After individual evaluations, assign a **reasonableness score (0–5)** using this scale: | |
| * **5** = All omissions appropriate for target readability. | |
| * **4** = Minor omissions could improve completeness. | |
| * **3** = Some omissions reduce understanding or medical clarity. | |
| * **2** = Many important omissions harm faithfulness. | |
| * **1** = Major omissions misrepresent case. | |
| * **0** = Summary fails to reflect key medical information. | |
| 4. End with an **overall explanation (3–5 sentences)** describing: | |
| * The main reasoning behind the score. | |
| * Whether the summary fits its intended readability level. | |
| * Suggestions for improvement if needed. | |
| --- | |
| ### **OUTPUT FORMAT (strict JSON)** | |
| ```json | |
| {{ | |
| "evaluation_table": [ | |
| {{ | |
| "id": <subclaim_id>, | |
| "subclaim": "<text>", | |
| "reasonable_omission": "<yes | no | borderline>", | |
| "explanation": "<short reason>" | |
| }} | |
| ], | |
| "reasonableness_score": <0-5>, | |
| "overall_explanation": "<concise paragraph>" | |
| }} | |
| ``` | |
| ''' | |
| return prompt | |
| from openai import OpenAI | |
| file_path = "/home/mshahidul/api_new.json" | |
| with open(file_path, "r") as file: | |
| api_keys = json.load(file) | |
| openai_api_key = api_keys.get("openai") | |
| client = OpenAI(api_key=openai_api_key) | |
| def openai_return(prompt): | |
| response = client.chat.completions.create( | |
| model="gpt-5-mini", | |
| messages=[ | |
| {"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful assistant."}, | |
| {"role": "user", "content": prompt} | |
| ] | |
| ) | |
| cleaned_response = response.choices[0].message.content.strip().replace("```json", "").replace("```", "") | |
| return json.loads(cleaned_response) | |
| import json | |
| file_path = "/home/mshahidul/readctrl/data/training_data_subclaim_verifier/synthetic_data_es_subclaims_100.json" | |
| with open(file_path, 'r') as f: | |
| synthetic_data = json.load(f) | |
| file_path_qwen3_32B = "/home/mshahidul/readctrl/results/dataset_quality_check/subclaim_verifier_results_100_qwen3-32B.json" | |
| with open(file_path_qwen3_32B, 'r') as f: | |
| qwen3_32B_results = json.load(f) | |
| # dict_keys(['id', 'full_text', 'ref_summary', 'readability_versions']) | |
| # print(f"Full text: {synthetic_data[0]['full_text']}") | |
| res=[] | |
| save_path = "/home/mshahidul/readctrl/results/dataset_quality_check/resonability_check_100_gpt5.json" | |
| if os.path.exists(save_path): | |
| with open(save_path, 'r') as f: | |
| res = json.load(f) | |
| print(f"Resuming from {len(res)} entries") | |
| import tqdm | |
| for ind in tqdm.tqdm(range(len(res),100)): | |
| print(f"Processing index: {ind}") | |
| for version in ["easy", "intermediate", "hard"]: | |
| ref_summary = (f"{synthetic_data[ind]['ref_summary']['text']}") | |
| generated_summary = (f"{synthetic_data[ind]['readability_versions'][version]['text']}") | |
| subclaims_results = (f"{qwen3_32B_results[ind]['completeness']['results']}") | |
| try: | |
| prompt = return_promptst(ref_summary, generated_summary, subclaims_results, version) | |
| res.append({ | |
| "id": synthetic_data[ind]['id'], | |
| "difficulty_level": version, | |
| "prompt": openai_return(prompt) | |
| }) | |
| if len(res)%2==0: | |
| print(f"Completed {len(res)} out of 300") | |
| with open(save_path, 'w') as outfile: | |
| json.dump(res, outfile, indent=2) | |
| except Exception as e: | |
| print(f"Error at {ind} {version}: {e}") | |
| # print(prompt) | |
| # assert False | |
| with open(save_path, 'w') as outfile: | |
| json.dump(res, outfile, indent=2) |