Papers
arxiv:2610.09788

Judging in Latent Space: Efficient Generative Reward Modeling via Semantics-Preserving Compression

Published on Oct 8
· Submitted by
Mashiro
on Oct 12
Authors:
,
,
,
,
,
,

Abstract

Reward modeling often requires jointly representing and reasoning over multiple evaluation criteria, yet verbalizing this process token by token can incur substantial inference cost. Recent work on latent reasoning suggests that continuous states may support this computation more compactly. We introduce LatentGRM, a latent evaluation framework built on semantic chunking, compression, and reconstruction. By using the structure of rubric-guided evaluations to guide compression, LatentGRM learns compact continuous trajectories that support autonomous pairwise judgments without generating textual assessments. A separate interpreter reconstructs evaluation text from these trajectories, providing an offline view of the information retained under compression. Under matched training data and backbones, LatentGRM achieves competitive aggregate preference accuracy relative to explicit Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) judges at both 4B and 8B scales. Across four benchmark domains, LatentGRM-8B compresses evaluation trajectories by 8.9--9.2x and reduces total judge inference time by 6.1--7.0x at vote@5. Controlled rubric interventions show that criterion-dependent preference information is carried through the latent sequence. Together, these results demonstrate that continuous latent evaluation can substantially reduce inference cost while preserving competitive judgment quality.

Community

Paper author Paper submitter

The interesting idea here is that a reward model doesn’t need to spell out every evaluation step to make a good judgment. LatentGRM compresses rubric-based reasoning into continuous latent states, keeping judgment accuracy competitive while cutting inference time by roughly 6–7× in the reported 8B experiments at vote@5. The rubric interventions are especially interesting: changing evaluation criteria changes the resulting preferences, suggesting that the latent trajectories retain criterion-specific information. There’s also an offline interpreter that recovers evaluation text from teacher-derived trajectories. It’s a promising way to make reasoning-heavy judges cheaper, with some visibility into what survives compression.

This is an automated message from the Librarian Bot. I found the following papers similar to this paper.

The following papers were recommended by the Semantic Scholar API

Please give a thumbs up to this comment if you found it helpful!

If you want recommendations for any Paper on Hugging Face checkout this Space

You can directly ask Librarian Bot for paper recommendations by tagging it in a comment: @librarian-bot recommend

Sign up or log in to comment

Get this paper in your agent:

hf papers read 2610.09788
Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash

Models citing this paper 0

No model linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2610.09788 in a model README.md to link it from this page.

Datasets citing this paper 0

No dataset linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2610.09788 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.

Spaces citing this paper 1

Collections including this paper 0

No Collection including this paper

Add this paper to a collection to link it from this page.