Papers
arxiv:2608.30795

Uncertainty-Aware End-to-End AI Weather Forecasting: Disentangling Observation and Model Contributions

Authors:
,
,
,
,

Abstract

The Aardvark Weather model is made probabilistic by adding learned observation noise and Monte Carlo dropout to its encoder and processor, yielding a calibrated nested ensemble that improves mean forecasts and separates aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty.

End-to-end weather forecasting systems produce skillful global gridded and station forecasts directly from raw Earth observations, replacing the numerical weather prediction pipeline, including data assimilation, at a fraction of its cost. These systems are deterministic and issue no uncertainty. Here we render the Aardvark Weather model probabilistic by attaching one stochastic mechanism to each component: learned, input-dependent noise at the observation encoder, capturing aleatoric uncertainty inherited from the observing system, and Monte Carlo dropout in the processor, capturing epistemic uncertainty in the learned dynamics. The resulting nested ensemble attributes forecast spread to the two sources through a law-of-total-variance decomposition, cross-checked by withholding observation streams. Probabilistic finetuning significantly improves the mean forecast, by 4.2% on average across variables and lead times. The ensemble is calibrated against ERA5 through the medium range (spread-skill ratio 0.98), keeps station RMSE within 2.4% of the deterministic model while beating it in CRPS at every lead time, and trails the operational ECMWF ensemble. The encoder branch behaves as observation-driven uncertainty. Component-attributed uncertainty makes end-to-end forecasts more transparent, a step toward observation-driven digital twins of the atmosphere.

Community

Paper author Paper submitter

We make an end-to-end AI weather model (Aardvark Weather) probabilistic with learned noise in the observation encoder and MC dropout in the processor, so a nested ensemble can split forecast uncertainty into observation-driven (aleatoric) and model-driven (epistemic) parts. The fine-tuned ensemble improves the deterministic mean by 4.2%, is calibrated through the medium range, and wins in CRPS at every lead time. Code and weights are released.

Sign up or log in to comment

Get this paper in your agent:

hf papers read 2608.30795
Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash

Models citing this paper 0

No model linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2608.30795 in a model README.md to link it from this page.

Datasets citing this paper 1

Spaces citing this paper 0

No Space linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2608.30795 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.

Collections including this paper 0

No Collection including this paper

Add this paper to a collection to link it from this page.