Beyond the Stability-Exploration Dilemma: Environmental Regularization for LLM Policy Optimization
Abstract
ERPO replaces action-side policy regularization with input-side query distribution control to stabilize reinforcement learning for language models while preserving response exploration.
Policy optimization (PO) for Large Language Models faces a stability--exploration trade-off, currently mediated by an action-side Policy-KL regularizer. This puts practitioners in a double bind: keeping Policy-KL constrains response behavior and consumes the action-side exploration budget, while dropping it leaves the optimization without an explicit drift control. We argue for an alternative that breaks the dilemma by moving regularization to the input side. As training progresses, the distribution over training queries induced by the current policy drifts unchecked from its pre-RL reference distribution. Concretely, Environment-Regularized Policy Optimization (ERPO) introduces a Query-KL (QKL) term that bounds this query distribution shift, together with a dataset-static reference-derived per-query weight that biases each per-query update toward queries typical under the reference. The QKL gradient flows strictly through the query likelihood; the response score function used by policy-gradient estimators does not appear in the QKL term, so QKL exerts no direct gradient pressure on the response distribution---exploration is preserved. ERPO plugs into GRPO/PPO/REINFORCE-style pipelines without additional forward passes. On six mathematical reasoning benchmarks, ERPO replaces the standard Policy-KL regularizer while achieving effective control over query distribution drift, delivering stronger accuracy and substantially more stable behavior under high-temperature decoding and long-horizon training.Our source code are available at https://github.com/alibaba/ERPO
Community
EMNLP’26
✅ Query-KL Replaces Policy-KL
✅ Plug-and-Play with DAPO & Other RL Methods
✅ Stronger Reasoning Across 6 Benchmarks
Moving regularization from responses to queries for more stable and exploratory LLM reasoning. 🚀
This is an automated message from the Librarian Bot. I found the following papers similar to this paper.
The following papers were recommended by the Semantic Scholar API
- ARMOR: Stabilizing On-Policy LLM RL with Off-Policy Anchor Samples (2026)
- UP: Unbounded Positive Asymmetric Optimization for Breaking the Exploration-Stability Dilemma (2026)
- Toward Plasticity-Preserving KL Regularization for Capability Retention in LLM Reinforcement Learning (2026)
- Turning Off-Policy Tokens On-Policy: A Plug-in Approach for Improving LLM Alignment (2026)
- The Mirage of Optimizing Training Policies: Monotonic Inference Policies as the Real Objective for LLM Reinforcement Learning (2026)
- ReCo: Reweighting GRPO Against Distributional Concentration (2026)
- Don't Peek at the Answer: Outcome-Masked Group Relative Policy Optimization for Label-Free RLVR (2026)
Please give a thumbs up to this comment if you found it helpful!
If you want recommendations for any Paper on Hugging Face checkout this Space
You can directly ask Librarian Bot for paper recommendations by tagging it in a comment: @librarian-bot recommend
Get this paper in your agent:
hf papers read 2608.23311 Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash Models citing this paper 0
No model linking this paper
Datasets citing this paper 0
No dataset linking this paper
Spaces citing this paper 0
No Space linking this paper