Papers
arxiv:2608.15008

Harness the Memory: A Holistic Evaluation of Memory Substrates in Memory Agents

Published on Aug 15
· Submitted by
Wei-Chieh Huang
on Aug 19
Authors:
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,

Abstract

Empirical evaluation of diverse memory substrates for long-horizon LLM agents reveals regime-dependent trade-offs, motivating adaptive substrate routing for reliable agent memory.

Memory is becoming core infrastructure for long-horizon LLM agents, yet existing evaluations offer limited guidance on which memory substrate, namely the underlying medium in which memory is represented and stored, should be used under different operating regimes. We present a controlled harness evaluation of memory substrates for memory-augmented agents, covering dense and sparse indices, text records, structural stores, hierarchical stores, refinement-based memories, parametric updates, and activation-compatible context mechanisms. Across three backbone models and four benchmark suites spanning user-centric question answering and agent-centric decision-making, we instrument 26 performance and efficiency metrics under a unified harness. Our results show that no single substrate consistently dominates: broad retrieval benefits long-context factual QA, while excessive retrieval can harm sequential decision-making by shifting attention away from action-critical context. Scalability introduces a further routing axis, as substrates that perform well at moderate history lengths can become costly or brittle at longer horizons. These findings motivate substrate routing as a necessary component of adaptive agent memory systems and provide empirical guidance for designing efficient, reliable, and regime-aware long-term memory for LLM agents. Code will be made available upon acceptance.

Community

Paper submitter

We present a controlled evaluation of memory substrates for memory-augmented LLM agents, covering dense and sparse retrieval, text and structural stores, hierarchical and refinement-based memories, parametric updates, and activation-compatible context mechanisms.

Across three backbone models and four benchmark suites, we evaluate 26 performance and efficiency metrics under a unified harness. Our results show that no single memory substrate consistently dominates: different substrates excel under different tasks, context lengths, and operating regimes. These findings highlight substrate routing as an important direction for building adaptive and efficient long-term memory systems for LLM agents.

Sign up or log in to comment

Get this paper in your agent:

hf papers read 2608.15008
Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash

Models citing this paper 0

No model linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2608.15008 in a model README.md to link it from this page.

Datasets citing this paper 0

No dataset linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2608.15008 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.

Spaces citing this paper 0

No Space linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2608.15008 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.

Collections including this paper 0

No Collection including this paper

Add this paper to a collection to link it from this page.