Abstract
Exploration is essential for reliable autonomy in multi-agent systems, yet it remains unclear whether large language model (LLM) agents can explore effectively when interacting with one another. We show that modern LLM agents fail to do so, often exhibiting myopic and polarized interaction patterns that lead to suboptimal coordination and increased regret. We formalize this challenge as the Multi-Agent Exploration problem, modeling it as a partially observable stochastic game (POSG) problem in which agents must probe peers to infer their capabilities and identify effective interaction strategies. To address this, we introduce Multi- Agent Contextual Exploration (MACE), a lightweight framework that explicitly promotes exploration through structured peer selection. Across both contextual and parametric diversity settings, MACE substantially improves exploration behavior and downstream task performance. We further show theoretically that the value of exploration increases with agent diversity. Overall, our results highlight a fundamental limitation of current LLM agents and underscore the importance of explicitly guided exploration for reliable multi-agent autonomy. Code will be released in https://github.com/deeplearning-wisc/mace
Community
1๏ธโฃ We find that current LLM agents, including frontier models, often fail to systematically explore their peers. Instead, they prematurely commit to a small number of agents, producing myopic and highly polarized interaction patterns.
2๏ธโฃ ๐๐ฉ๐บ ๐ฅ๐ฐ๐ฆ๐ด ๐ต๐ฉ๐ช๐ด ๐ฎ๐ข๐ต๐ต๐ฆ๐ณ? In real-world multi-agent systems, agents may possess different knowledge, capabilities, and areas of expertise. To collaborate effectively, an agent must explore its peers, identify complementary strengths, and learn whom to interact with in different contexts. Without effective exploration, even a system of individually capable agents can suffer from poor coordination and miss valuable information.
3๏ธโฃ To address this, we introduce ๐ด๐๐๐๐-๐จ๐๐๐๐ ๐ช๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ฌ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ (๐ด๐จ๐ช๐ฌ), a lightweight framework that uses structured, contextual-bandit-based peer selection to help agents discover effective collaborators.
4๏ธโฃ Theoretically, MACE achieves sublinear regret, whereas non-exploring strategies incur linear regret. Importantly, the value of exploration grows as the agents become more diverse.
๐ฏ Our results highlight a fundamental lesson for multi-agent autonomy: building stronger individual agents is not enough. We must also enable them to systematically discover and learn from one another.
This is an automated message from the Librarian Bot. I found the following papers similar to this paper.
The following papers were recommended by the Semantic Scholar API
- Decision Protocols in Multi-Agent Large Language Model Conversations (2026)
- Norm Enforcement for AI Agents: Robustly Shaping Behavior in Multi-Agent Systems (2026)
- TRACER: Turn-level Regret Matching with Inner Reinforcement Credit for Cooperative Multi-LLM Reasoning (2026)
- DICE: Entropy-Regularized Equilibrium Selection for Stable Multi-Agent LLM Coordination (2026)
- Multi-agent AI systems outperform human teams in creativity (2026)
- CoRe-Code: Collaborative Reinforcement Learning for Code Generation (2026)
- Code as Agent Harness (2026)
Please give a thumbs up to this comment if you found it helpful!
If you want recommendations for any Paper on Hugging Face checkout this Space
You can directly ask Librarian Bot for paper recommendations by tagging it in a comment: @librarian-bot recommend
Models citing this paper 0
No model linking this paper
Datasets citing this paper 0
No dataset linking this paper
Spaces citing this paper 0
No Space linking this paper
Collections including this paper 0
No Collection including this paper