Papers
arxiv:2511.11584

Output Supervision Can Obfuscate the Chain of Thought

Published on Oct 11, 2025
Authors:
,
,
,
,

Abstract

Training models with output monitors that lack access to chain-of-thought reasoning can still produce obfuscated reasoning paths through two mechanisms: generalization of safe-looking reasoning and reinforcement of safe reasoning through token conditioning.

OpenAI (2025) showed that training against a chain of thought (CoT) monitor can cause obfuscated CoTs, which contain bad behavior the monitor cannot detect. They proposed to keep CoTs monitorable by training only against output monitors that do not have access to CoT. We show that such training can still cause obfuscated CoTs via two mechanisms. First, when a model is trained to produce a safe-looking output, that model may generalize to making its CoTs look safe. Second, since later tokens are conditioned on earlier ones, safe-looking CoTs may increase the likelihood of safe outputs, causing safe-looking CoTs to be reinforced. We introduce two mitigations to address these two issues, which achieve a Pareto improvement in terms of monitorability and task performance compared to regular training.

Community

Sign up or log in to comment

Get this paper in your agent:

hf papers read 2511.11584
Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash

Models citing this paper 1

Datasets citing this paper 0

No dataset linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2511.11584 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.

Spaces citing this paper 0

No Space linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2511.11584 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.

Collections including this paper 0

No Collection including this paper

Add this paper to a collection to link it from this page.