Papers
arxiv:2507.19684

CoMPAS3D: A Dataset and Benchmark for Interactive Motion

Published on Jun 2
Authors:
,
,
,
,
,
,
,

Abstract

A new motion capture dataset and evaluation framework for socially interactive humanoid robots are introduced, focusing on movement legibility and proficiency appropriateness in partner dancing contexts.

Socially interactive humanoid robots must engage with humans through their bodies, adapting in real time to a partner's movement, intent, and abilities. This requires models that understand not just how bodies move, but what movement means in a shared social context. Yet evaluation frameworks for interactive motion generation do not measure whether generated follower motion is legible within a shared movement vocabulary, nor whether it is appropriate to the partner's proficiency level. This gap has two causes: existing frameworks rely on kinematic metrics such as FID and beat alignment that cannot measure either property, and existing datasets lack the move annotations and proficiency variation needed. Salsa is well-suited as an evaluation domain: improvised, dyadic, and governed by a move vocabulary and judging criteria covering timing, musicality, technique, difficulty, partnering, and originality. We present CoMPAS3D, a motion capture dataset of improvised partner salsa paired with an evaluation framework covering kinematic quality, two objective metrics (move legibility and proficiency appropriateness), and six competition-based subjective dimensions. The dataset includes 3 hours of improvisation by 18 dancers spanning beginner, intermediate, and professional levels, with over 2,800 expert-annotated segments covering move types, errors, and stylistic elements. We define three benchmarks: move classification (analogous to transcription), proficiency estimation (fluency assessment), and follower generation (dialogue response). Fine-tuned vision-language models perform strongly on objective metrics applied to ground-truth motion sequences. Applied to Duolando and InterGen, the metrics reveal failures that kinematic metrics miss. Human evaluations confirm the gap between generated and ground-truth motion. CoMPAS3D, annotations, benchmark code, and baseline results are publicly available.

Community

Sign up or log in to comment

Get this paper in your agent:

hf papers read 2507.19684
Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash

Models citing this paper 0

No model linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2507.19684 in a model README.md to link it from this page.

Datasets citing this paper 1

Spaces citing this paper 0

No Space linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2507.19684 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.

Collections including this paper 0

No Collection including this paper

Add this paper to a collection to link it from this page.