File size: 4,170 Bytes
7f7972d | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 | # Benchmark Results - Stack 2.9
> **Note**: These benchmarks are currently in progress. Results will be published after training is complete.
## Benchmark Overview
Stack 2.9 will be evaluated on a comprehensive suite of benchmarks to measure coding capabilities, tool use proficiency, and overall model performance. The evaluation framework includes both standard coding benchmarks and custom tool-use scenarios.
## Planned Benchmarks
### 1. HumanEval
**Description**: A set of 164 Python programming problems from OpenAI's HumanEval benchmark.
**Metrics**: Pass@k (k=1, 10, 100)
**Expected Range**: 70-80% pass@1 (based on Qwen2.5-Coder-32B baseline of ~76.8%)
**Status**: Scheduled for post-training evaluation
### 2. MBPP (Mostly Basic Python Programming)
**Description**: 500 Python function synthesis problems from Google's MBPP dataset.
**Metrics**: Pass@1, execution accuracy
**Expected Range**: 80-85% pass@1 (based on Qwen2.5-Coder-32B baseline of ~82.3%)
**Status**: Scheduled for post-training evaluation
### 3. SWE-bench
**Description**: Real-world GitHub issues requiring code modifications and debugging. This is the most challenging software engineering benchmark.
**Metrics**: Resolution rate, edit similarity, test pass rate
**Expected Range**: 15-25% resolution rate (based on similar 32B parameter models)
**Status**: Planned for comprehensive testing post-training
### 4. Tool Use Accuracy (Custom OpenClaw Suite)
**Description**: 500 tasks covering OpenClaw-specific tool patterns: file operations, search, API calls, system commands, data processing, and multi-step workflows.
**Metrics**: Task completion rate, tool call accuracy, parameter correctness, workflow success
**Expected Range**: 85-92% overall task completion (conservative estimate based on fine-tuning for tool patterns)
**Status**: Evaluation framework in development
## Additional Evaluations
### Context Understanding
- **Long-context benchmark**: Testing 128K token window utilization
- **Multi-file reasoning**: Cross-file code comprehension and modification
### Specialized Domains
- **Voice Integration**: Voice command processing and response generation
- **Documentation Generation**: Quality assessment of auto-generated API docs
- **Code Review**: Bug detection and suggestion quality
## Results Template
Once evaluations are complete, results will be published in the following format:
| Benchmark | Pass@1 / Score | Sample Size | Evaluation Date | Notes |
|-----------|----------------|-------------|-----------------|-------|
| HumanEval | TBD | 164 problems | TBD | Standard Python coding |
| MBPP | TBD | 500 problems | TBD | Basic Python synthesis |
| SWE-bench | TBD | Varies | TBD | Real-world GitHub issues |
| Tool Use | TBD | 500 tasks | TBD | OpenClaw tool patterns |
| GSM8K | TBD | 1319 problems | TBD | Math reasoning (optional) |
## Benchmark Methodology
### Testing Conditions
- Temperature: 0.2 (for code generation tasks)
- Top_p: 0.95
- Batch size: 1 (unless otherwise noted)
- Hardware: NVIDIA A100 80GB (or equivalent)
- Quantization: AWQ 4-bit where applicable
- Inference engine: vLLM or similar for throughput testing
### Evaluation Process
1. **Preprocessing**: Standardized test set preparation with sanitization
2. **Inference**: Automated generation of responses for each test case
3. **Verification**: Automated test execution for coding problems
4. **Analysis**: Statistical aggregation and result compilation
5. **Documentation**: Detailed methodology and raw results publication
## Timeline
- **Training Completion**: [Date to be announced]
- **Benchmark Execution**: 1-2 weeks post-training
- **Results Analysis**: 1 week
- **Public Release**: 1 week after analysis completion
## Publication
Results will be published in multiple formats:
1. **This document** (BENCHMARKS.md) - Summary tables and key findings
2. **Detailed report** ( BENCHMARKS_DETAILED.md) - In-depth methodology and raw scores
3. **GitHub Release** - Official results with reproducible evaluation scripts
4. **OpenRouter listing** - Performance metrics for model comparison
---
**Stack 2.9 Benchmark Status**: In Progress | Results Coming Soon
|