solsticestudioai commited on
Commit
9a961f7
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): f67930e

Add Forge Industrial sample (10K lifecycles, 14-field schema) with README, SCHEMA, parquet, JSONL

Browse files
.gitattributes CHANGED
@@ -58,3 +58,4 @@ saved_model/**/* filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
58
  # Video files - compressed
59
  *.mp4 filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
60
  *.webm filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
 
 
58
  # Video files - compressed
59
  *.mp4 filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
60
  *.webm filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
61
+ forge_industrial_sample.jsonl filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
README.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,166 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ ---
2
+ license: cc-by-4.0
3
+ task_categories:
4
+ - tabular-classification
5
+ - tabular-regression
6
+ - time-series-forecasting
7
+ - reinforcement-learning
8
+ language:
9
+ - en
10
+ tags:
11
+ - synthetic
12
+ - industrial-real-estate
13
+ - logistics
14
+ - warehouse
15
+ - supply-chain
16
+ - operations
17
+ - decision-support
18
+ - anomaly-detection
19
+ - forecasting
20
+ - policy-optimization
21
+ - capacity-planning
22
+ - cold-chain
23
+ - last-mile
24
+ pretty_name: Forge Industrial Intelligence Pack
25
+ size_categories:
26
+ - 10K<n<100K
27
+ configs:
28
+ - config_name: default
29
+ data_files:
30
+ - split: train
31
+ path: forge_industrial_sample.parquet
32
+ ---
33
+
34
+ # Forge Industrial Intelligence Pack (Sample)
35
+
36
+ **A synthetic industrial real estate, logistics, and operations decision-telemetry dataset for anomaly detection, forecasting, decision-support, and policy-optimization research.** Each row is a complete operational scenario lifecycle — from signal emergence through telemetry evolution, detection, forecast, impact, and recommended action — with 14 top-level context fields tying market, tenant, facility, portfolio, and decision-owner layers together.
37
+
38
+ Built by [SolsticeAI](https://www.solsticestudio.ai/datasets) as a free sample of a larger commercial pack. 100% synthetic. No real facility data, no real tenant names, no real portfolio telemetry — market names (Dallas-Fort Worth, LA, Chicago, etc.) refer to generic submarket archetypes, not specific properties or operators.
39
+
40
+ ## What is included
41
+
42
+ | File | Rows | Format | Purpose |
43
+ |---|---:|---|---|
44
+ | `forge_industrial_sample.parquet` | 10,000 | Parquet | Columnar, typed, best for analytics |
45
+ | `forge_industrial_sample.jsonl` | 10,000 | JSON Lines | Streaming / LLM training friendly |
46
+
47
+ **This sample:** 10,000 operational scenario lifecycles.
48
+ **Severity tiers:** `medium`, `high`, `critical` (~3,300 each)
49
+ **Status:** `decision_pending`, `confirmed`, `triaged` (~3,300 each)
50
+ **Scenario classes (7):** `port_spillover_surge`, `power_constrained_ev_yard`, `labor_gap_service_degradation`, `cold_chain_excursion_risk`, `tenant_hypergrowth_overrun`, `last_mile_cutoff_compression`, `site_selection_power_arbitrage`
51
+ **Markets (6):** Dallas-Fort Worth, Los Angeles, Chicago, Atlanta, New Jersey, Phoenix
52
+ **Tenant industries (5):** ecommerce, 3PL, retail distribution, cold chain, industrial manufacturing
53
+ **Action library:** 14+ playbook actions across labor, power, capex, tenant, network, and pricing levers
54
+
55
+ ## Record structure
56
+
57
+ Each record is one operational scenario lifecycle with 14 top-level fields:
58
+
59
+ | Field | Type | Contents |
60
+ |---|---|---|
61
+ | `schema_version` | string | Pack schema version (`1.0.0-forge-industrial-sample`) |
62
+ | `event` | struct | `id`, `trace_id`, `timestamp`, `scenario`, `severity`, `status`, `confidence` |
63
+ | `organization` | struct | `sector`, `market`, `submarket`, `region`, `environment`, port/airport proximity, grid headroom, vacancy, base rent, development cycle |
64
+ | `identity_context` | struct | `principal_id`, `decision_lineage[]` (role/action/authority), `auth_method`, `stakeholder_latency_hours`, `meeting_load` |
65
+ | `vulnerability` | struct | `class`, `risk_taxonomy[]`, `exposure`, `severity_model` (base_score + vector) |
66
+ | `tenant_context` | struct | `tenant_id`, `industry`, `truck_profile`, growth rate, square footage, expansion openness, retention priority, churn risk |
67
+ | `facility_context` | struct | Building characteristics, capacity, energy profile |
68
+ | `portfolio_context` | struct | Network-level dynamics, capacity distribution |
69
+ | `telemetry_stream` | list<struct> | Ordered telemetry readings (dock utilization, queue length, power load, service commitment risk, etc.) with per-step event labels |
70
+ | `detection` | struct | `analytic_family`, `primary_risk_class`, `rule_logic`, `baseline_deviation`, `anomaly_score`, `confidence_band`, `signal_conflicts[]` |
71
+ | `forecast` | struct | Forward-looking predictions (demand shift, occupancy, pricing) |
72
+ | `impact` | struct | Economic consequences (revenue delta, NOI, capex, churn risk) |
73
+ | `response` | struct | `recommended_actions[]`, `primary_action`, `primary_action_score`, `primary_action_reason`, `alternative_actions[]`, `decision_owner`, `execution_window_days`, `playbook_id`, `capex_gate_required`, `stakeholders[]`, `expected_operational_outcome`, `recommended_tradeoff`, `execution_risk_band` |
74
+ | `simulation` | struct | `synthetic`, `engine`, `causal_coherence`, `friction_profile`, `ground_truth_label`, `intended_use[]` |
75
+
76
+ See [SCHEMA.md](./SCHEMA.md) for the full nested field breakdown.
77
+
78
+ ## Why this dataset is useful
79
+
80
+ Most public operations / logistics datasets are either flat sensor-stream snapshots or narrow single-scenario studies. Industrial real estate telemetry (dock utilization, grid headroom, tenant churn signals, decision lineage) is effectively never published. This pack is shaped around what operational-intelligence and decision-policy teams actually need:
81
+
82
+ - Full scenario lifecycles rather than isolated sensor frames
83
+ - Balanced severity and status distributions across decision-pending, triaged, and confirmed cases
84
+ - Coupled detection → forecast → impact → response layers per record (not just telemetry)
85
+ - Economic impact fields (revenue, NOI, capex, churn) for decision-aware modeling
86
+ - Decision-lineage metadata for policy-interpretability research
87
+ - Cross-scenario coverage (port, power, labor, cold chain, tenant, last-mile, site selection)
88
+ - Compact parquet (~3.8 MB) that fits inside CI and notebooks, with a fuller JSONL for LLM training
89
+
90
+ ## Typical use cases
91
+
92
+ - Operational-anomaly detection models
93
+ - Capacity-planning and forecasting pipelines
94
+ - Decision-support and recommendation engines
95
+ - RL / policy optimization for industrial operations
96
+ - Tenant-churn and retention modeling
97
+ - Site-selection and network-optimization research
98
+ - LLM fine-tuning on operational narratives and decision rationale
99
+ - Scenario-mining for logistics debugging
100
+ - Executive-dashboard and BI template development
101
+
102
+ ## Quick start
103
+
104
+ ```python
105
+ import pandas as pd
106
+ import pyarrow.parquet as pq
107
+
108
+ df = pq.read_table("forge_industrial_sample.parquet").to_pandas()
109
+
110
+ # Severity distribution
111
+ print(df["event"].apply(lambda e: e["severity"]).value_counts())
112
+
113
+ # Scenario × primary action cross-tab
114
+ df["scenario"] = df["event"].apply(lambda e: e["scenario"])
115
+ df["primary_action"] = df["response"].apply(lambda r: r["primary_action"])
116
+ print(pd.crosstab(df["scenario"], df["primary_action"]))
117
+
118
+ # Average impact.revenue_delta_usd by market
119
+ df["market"] = df["organization"].apply(lambda o: o["market"])
120
+ df["rev_delta"] = df["impact"].apply(lambda i: i.get("revenue_delta_usd"))
121
+ print(df.groupby("market")["rev_delta"].mean().round(0))
122
+ ```
123
+
124
+ Streaming form:
125
+
126
+ ```python
127
+ import json
128
+
129
+ with open("forge_industrial_sample.jsonl") as f:
130
+ for line in f:
131
+ lifecycle = json.loads(line)
132
+ # one operational scenario lifecycle per line
133
+ ```
134
+
135
+ ## Responsible use
136
+
137
+ This dataset is intended for **research, model development, and decision-policy simulation** around industrial real estate, logistics, and operations. It contains synthesized telemetry, decision lineages, and economic-impact rollups — it does **not** contain real facility telemetry, real tenant identities, real portfolio NOI, or identifiable stakeholder data. Models trained on this data should be validated against real operational data under appropriate organizational review before being used for live recommendations or capex decisions.
138
+
139
+ ## License
140
+
141
+ Released under **CC BY 4.0**. Use freely for research, operations-tool prototyping, education, and commercial development with attribution.
142
+
143
+ ## Get the full pack
144
+
145
+ This Hugging Face repo is a **10K-lifecycle sample**. The production pack scales to 5M+ lifecycles with expanded market and submarket coverage, richer per-step telemetry (ms-level sensor traces where applicable), additional scenario classes (ESG signals, geopolitical supply disruption, labor automation events, bonded warehouse flows), multi-year longitudinal traces per tenant, parquet + JSONL + BI-tool-aligned delivery, and buyer-specific variants.
146
+
147
+ **Self-serve (Stripe checkout):**
148
+ - [**Sample Scale tier — $5,000**](https://buy.stripe.com/7sY5kD2j85QTfSb5lfeEo03) — ~25K records, one subject, 72-hour delivery.
149
+
150
+ **Full pack + enterprise scope:**
151
+ - [www.solsticestudio.ai/datasets](https://www.solsticestudio.ai/datasets) — per-SKU pricing across Starter / Professional / Enterprise tiers, plus commercial licensing, custom generation, and buyer-specific variants.
152
+
153
+ **Procurement catalog:**
154
+ - [SolsticeAI Data Storefront](https://solsticeai.mydatastorefront.com) — available via Datarade / Monda.
155
+
156
+ ## Citation
157
+
158
+ ```bibtex
159
+ @dataset{solstice_forge_industrial_pack_2026,
160
+ title = {Forge Industrial Intelligence Pack (Sample)},
161
+ author = {SolsticeAI},
162
+ year = {2026},
163
+ publisher = {Hugging Face},
164
+ url = {https://huggingface.co/datasets/solsticestudioai/forge-industrial-pack}
165
+ }
166
+ ```
SCHEMA.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,161 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ # Forge Industrial Intelligence Pack — Schema
2
+
3
+ One row = one complete operational scenario lifecycle. All records share the same fourteen top-level fields.
4
+
5
+ Schema version: `1.0.0-forge-industrial-sample`
6
+
7
+ ## Top-level fields
8
+
9
+ ### `schema_version` — string
10
+ Schema identifier. Constant within a sample release.
11
+
12
+ ### `event` — struct
13
+ Identifier fields and the overall status/severity for the lifecycle.
14
+
15
+ | Field | Type | Notes |
16
+ |---|---|---|
17
+ | `id` | string | Stable event identifier, e.g., `FORGE-100000`. |
18
+ | `trace_id` | string (UUID) | Cross-links telemetry within the lifecycle. |
19
+ | `timestamp` | string (ISO-8601) | Scenario anchor time. |
20
+ | `scenario` | string | One of: `port_spillover_surge`, `power_constrained_ev_yard`, `labor_gap_service_degradation`, `cold_chain_excursion_risk`, `tenant_hypergrowth_overrun`, `last_mile_cutoff_compression`, `site_selection_power_arbitrage`. |
21
+ | `severity` | string | `medium`, `high`, `critical`. |
22
+ | `status` | string | `decision_pending`, `triaged`, `confirmed`. |
23
+ | `confidence` | double | 0–1 confidence of the event label. |
24
+
25
+ ### `organization` — struct
26
+ Market-level context for the facility/portfolio.
27
+
28
+ | Field | Type | Notes |
29
+ |---|---|---|
30
+ | `sector` | string | Always `industrial_real_estate`. |
31
+ | `market` | string | Generic submarket archetype (e.g., `Dallas-Fort Worth`, `Los Angeles`, `Chicago`, `Atlanta`, `New Jersey`, `Phoenix`). Used as a type-label, not a specific-property reference. |
32
+ | `submarket` | string | Submarket handle (e.g., `Inland Port`, `Inland Empire`, `Joliet`, `West Valley`). |
33
+ | `region` | string | Regional bucket (`south_central_us`, `west_coast_us`, etc.). |
34
+ | `environment` | string | Deployment bucket (e.g., `production_portfolio`). |
35
+ | `port_proximity_km` | int | Proximity to major port, km. |
36
+ | `airport_proximity_km` | int | Proximity to major airport, km. |
37
+ | `highway_access_score` | double | 0–1. |
38
+ | `labor_tightness` | double | 0–1. |
39
+ | `grid_headroom_mw` | double | Available grid capacity (MW). |
40
+ | `industrial_vacancy_pct` | double | Submarket vacancy rate (percent). |
41
+ | `base_rent_psf_yr` | double | Submarket base rent ($/sqft/yr). |
42
+ | `population_density` | int | People per sq km. |
43
+ | `development_cycle_days` | int | Typical time-to-delivery for spec construction. |
44
+
45
+ ### `identity_context` — struct
46
+ Decision owner and authorization lineage.
47
+
48
+ | Field | Type | Notes |
49
+ |---|---|---|
50
+ | `principal_id` | string | Synthetic identity handle (e.g., `ops://tnt-XXX/node/fac-YYY`). |
51
+ | `decision_lineage` | list<struct> | Ordered `role` / `action` / `authority_level` entries showing the approval chain. |
52
+ | `auth_method` | string | How the decision was authenticated (e.g., `tower_dashboard`). |
53
+ | `is_automated_recommendation` | bool | Whether the decision started as an automated rec. |
54
+ | `stakeholder_latency_hours` | int | Hours of stakeholder lag. |
55
+ | `meeting_load` | string | `low` / `moderate` / `high`. |
56
+
57
+ ### `vulnerability` — struct
58
+ Risk taxonomy and severity vector.
59
+
60
+ | Field | Type | Notes |
61
+ |---|---|---|
62
+ | `class` | string | Scenario-class label (same as `simulation.ground_truth_label`). |
63
+ | `risk_taxonomy` | list<string> | Ordered taxonomy codes (e.g., `LOG-LOC-001`, `LOG-DEM-004`). |
64
+ | `exposure` | string | Primary exposure dimension (e.g., `demand_pressure`, `service_risk`). |
65
+ | `severity_model.base_score` | double | 0–10 severity base. |
66
+ | `severity_model.vector` | string | Vector string encoding severity dimensions (e.g., `LOG:3.1/EX:O/FR:C/...`). |
67
+
68
+ ### `tenant_context` — struct
69
+ Synthetic tenant profile tied to this scenario.
70
+
71
+ | Field | Type | Notes |
72
+ |---|---|---|
73
+ | `tenant_id` | string | Synthetic tenant identifier (e.g., `TNT-189FCA4461`). |
74
+ | `industry` | string | `ecommerce`, `3pl`, `retail_distribution`, `cold_chain`, `industrial_manufacturing`. |
75
+ | `truck_profile` | string | `parcel_heavy`, `mixed_freight`, `palletized`, `reefer`, `inbound_component`. |
76
+ | `order_growth_rate` | double | Growth rate delta. |
77
+ | `sqft_footprint` | int | Facility sqft. |
78
+ | `expansion_open` | bool | Whether the tenant is open to expanding. |
79
+ | `retention_priority` | string | `standard`, `high`, `strategic`. |
80
+ | `risk_of_churn` | double | 0–1 churn risk. |
81
+
82
+ ### `facility_context` — struct
83
+ Building-level attributes: capacity, energy, clear heights, dock counts, refrigeration, automation level.
84
+
85
+ ### `portfolio_context` — struct
86
+ Network-level dynamics: submarket share, adjacent-node capacity, cross-site elasticity.
87
+
88
+ ### `telemetry_stream` — list<struct>
89
+ Variable-length ordered telemetry readings representing the evolving system state across the scenario. Each element includes an event-name label matching one item in the scenario's event sequence, plus relevant signal readings (dock utilization, queue length, power load, service commitment risk, truck turn time, temperature delta, etc.).
90
+
91
+ ### `detection` — struct
92
+ Anomaly-signature metadata.
93
+
94
+ | Field | Type | Notes |
95
+ |---|---|---|
96
+ | `analytic_family` | string | Analytic family label (e.g., `industrial_real_estate_behavioral_intelligence`). |
97
+ | `primary_risk_class` | string | Primary risk dimension. |
98
+ | `rule_logic` | string | SQL-like rule expression for the detector. |
99
+ | `baseline_deviation` | string | Short English description of the deviation pattern. |
100
+ | `anomaly_score` | double | 0–1. |
101
+ | `confidence_band` | string | `low` / `medium` / `high` / `very_high`. |
102
+ | `forecast_pressure_delta` | double | Delta vs baseline forecast. |
103
+ | `signal_conflicts` | list<string> | Conflicting signal labels, if any. |
104
+
105
+ ### `forecast` — struct
106
+ Forward-looking predictions tied to this scenario: demand shift, occupancy trajectory, pricing outlook.
107
+
108
+ ### `impact` — struct
109
+ Economic consequences: revenue delta, NOI impact, capex required, churn risk delta.
110
+
111
+ ### `response` — struct
112
+ Recommended actions and execution context.
113
+
114
+ | Field | Type | Notes |
115
+ |---|---|---|
116
+ | `recommended_actions` | list<string> | Top actions ranked by score. |
117
+ | `primary_action` | string | Selected action (e.g., `shift_overflow_to_satellite`). |
118
+ | `primary_action_score` | double | Scoring metric for the primary action. |
119
+ | `primary_action_reason` | string | Short reason code. |
120
+ | `alternative_actions` | list<struct> | `action` / `score` / `reason` triples. |
121
+ | `decision_owner` | string | Role who owns the decision (e.g., `operations_lead`, `market_officer`, `development_committee`). |
122
+ | `execution_window_days` | int | Execution SLA. |
123
+ | `playbook_id` | string | Synthetic playbook identifier, prefixed `FORGE-PB-`. |
124
+ | `capex_gate_required` | bool | Whether capex approval is required. |
125
+ | `stakeholders` | list<string> | Additional stakeholder roles. |
126
+ | `expected_operational_outcome` | string | `partial_success`, `success`, `mitigation`, etc. |
127
+ | `recommended_tradeoff` | string | Short tradeoff description (e.g., `preserve_capital_with_higher_latency_risk`). |
128
+ | `execution_risk_band` | string | `low`, `moderate`, `elevated`, `high`. |
129
+
130
+ ### `simulation` — struct
131
+ Simulation engine provenance and ground-truth labels.
132
+
133
+ | Field | Type | Notes |
134
+ |---|---|---|
135
+ | `synthetic` | bool | Always `true`. |
136
+ | `engine` | string | Simulation engine label (`forge_industrial_sim_v1`). |
137
+ | `causal_coherence` | string | Coherence mode descriptor (e.g., `rich_schema_with_balanced_policy`). |
138
+ | `friction_profile` | struct | Numeric friction dimensions: `budget_pressure`, `labor_shortage`, `power_stress`, `demand_pressure`, `service_risk`, `portfolio_tightness`, `capital_availability`, `entitlement_friction`, `weather_disruption`, `upside_mode` (bool). |
139
+ | `ground_truth_label` | string | Scenario class (e.g., `Network_Optimization`, `Labor_Constraint`, `Temperature_Control_Risk`). |
140
+ | `intended_use` | list<string> | ML use-case tags (e.g., `forecasting`, `site_selection`, `tenant_expansion_decisions`). |
141
+
142
+ ## Distribution of this sample
143
+
144
+ - 10,000 lifecycles total.
145
+ - Severity: balanced across `medium` / `high` / `critical` (~3,300 each).
146
+ - Status: balanced across `decision_pending` / `triaged` / `confirmed` (~3,300 each).
147
+ - Scenario: balanced across 7 scenario classes (~1,400 each).
148
+ - Market: balanced across 6 submarket archetypes (~1,600 each).
149
+ - Industry: balanced across 5 tenant archetypes (~2,000 each).
150
+
151
+ ## Sanitization notes
152
+
153
+ - Internal identifier prefix (`PLG-REAL-*`) has been normalized to `FORGE-*`.
154
+ - Internal playbook prefix (`PLG-PB-*`) has been normalized to `FORGE-PB-*`.
155
+ - Internal engine label (`SIMA-inspired industrial reality generator`) has been normalized to `forge_industrial_sim_v1`.
156
+ - Market names (Dallas-Fort Worth, LA, Chicago, Atlanta, NJ, Phoenix) are used as submarket archetypes for industrial-real-estate type labels, not specific property or operator references.
157
+ - No real facility telemetry, real tenant identities, real portfolio NOI, or identifiable stakeholder data are present.
158
+
159
+ ## Relationship to the full pack
160
+
161
+ The production pack scales to 5M+ lifecycles with expanded market and submarket coverage, richer per-step telemetry, additional scenario classes (ESG signals, geopolitical supply disruption, labor automation events, bonded warehouse flows), and multi-year longitudinal traces per tenant. See the pack card for commercial access.
forge_industrial_sample.jsonl ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
 
 
 
 
1
+ version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
2
+ oid sha256:cc833d29efd7fbe6408a5a3d0509b55983405c9c2df195f4eccc84ee49a5be55
3
+ size 89543139
forge_industrial_sample.parquet ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
 
 
 
 
1
+ version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
2
+ oid sha256:ca30366f051e7183ba69c2673488f26e118a2b7e56771edbef34efd3110f6a17
3
+ size 3839254